HomeMy WebLinkAboutVail Valley Medical Center 1977 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS
5032 ALHAMBRA AVENUE, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90032 • (213) 223-1471
December 15, 1977
Victor L. Taugher, P.E.
Building Official
County of Alameda
Public Works Department
399 Elmhurst Street
Hayward, CA 94544
Dear Vic:
This acknowledges your letter of November 28, 1977. On December
2, 1977, IAPMO's Board of Directors met and extensively discussed
ICBO's proposals for a closer working relationship between our
two organizations. IAPMO's Board is unanimously in favor of your
primary objective, which is the promotion of a common organization
through which our respective Codes and publications could be
presented as a complete, or full line package. The suggested
name would be "International Conference of Code Officials" ("ICCO")
or a variant thereof.
IAPMO's Board of Directors would be pleased to submit this concept
to the membership for approval, with the following amplification:
1. ICCO would initially consist of a Board of Trustees having
10 members, five from ICBO and five from IAPMO, appointed
by the respective Boards of Directors of ICBO and IAPMO.
2. A quorum for an ICCO meeting would be eight Trustees in
attendance. In no event, however, would either ICBO or
IAPMO have more votes than the other. Thus, if there were
eight trustees present at a meeting, of whom five were from
IAPMO and three from ICBO, IAPMO could cast only three votes,
so that each of the constituent organizations would, at all
times, have negative control.
3. ICCO's Board of Trustees would have delegated to it specific
powers enumerated in a contract between ICBO and IAPMO. These
powers will have to be carefully defined in order to forestall
misunderstandings. At first, they would probably include
little more than policy making in the publishing area. As
time goes on if the idea works, there will unquestionably
be additions to ICCO's powers, with the possibility of a true
merger in the future.
Frederick S. Scott Architect
717 Office Parkway
St. Louis, Mo. 63141
Phone 314-567-9000
December 5, 1977
Mr. Knud 0. Rasmussen, P.E.
Gingery Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
2840 South Vallejo Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Reference: Vail Valley Medical Center
Job No. 452.026
Dear Mr. Rasmussen:
We are in receipt of your letter of November 3, 1977 regarding
your plan review for the town of Vail for this project.
Inasmuch as we had not requested a review through the town of
Vail of the comments of Mr. J. Ralph Karlberg, Chief, Design and
Construction Division, Department of Health, State of Colorado,
we do not believe that your additional time spent in review of
Mr. Karlberg's comments is our obligation, and we believe that
you should refer this request for supplemental payment to the
town of Vail, assuming that their instructions to you included
the requirement that you review Mr. Karlberg's comments.
By copy of this letter we are also informing Mr. Bill Pierce,
Chief, Building Official of the Town of Vail, of our response to
Mr. Knud O. Rasmussen, P.E. December 5, 1977
Gingery Associates, Inc. Page 2
Consulting Engineers
2840 South Vallejo Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
your request, and again, we are unaware of where the request
generated for you to review Mr. Karlberg's comments on this
project. -
Sincerely,
Wayne A. Franks
WAF:lmo
cc: Bill Pierce, Chief/
Building Official of the Town of Vail
•
Frederick S. Scott Architect
717 Office Parkway
St Louis, Mo. 63
Phone 314 5 67-900 0
October 20, 1977
Mr. Bill Pierce
Chief Building Official
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Reference: Vail Valley Medical Center
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Pierce:
We would like to provide the following itemized response to the
plan review comments provided on this project by Gingery Associates,
Inc., Consulting Engineers, under cover of their letter dated
August 29, 1977.
SECTION I
Reference State Plan Review Comments
A. Architectural - First Floor
Item 2
We have added an exit sign over Door marked 1/21
Corridor 1/24 as suggested by Mr. Ralph Karlberg.
Items 2, 4 and 6
We shall comply as recommended.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 2
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Item 8
We have added a door in Corridor R1-21 to eliminate
this dead end corridor situation. We would like to
indicate that the lab area does have two means of
egress out of it.
Item 14
Shall be complied with.
B Architectural - Second Floor
Item 1
Has been corrected to comply with the code.
Item 3
In order to comply with Life Safety Code requirements
vision panels have been installed in the wall between
the waiting area and the adjoining Administrative
Secretary's, to allow for direct supervision.
Item 4 - Part 1 & 3
It is our consideration that this second floor area will
not be used by the handicapped and is not required to be
accessible to the handicapped. We have therefore, made
no changes as suggested.
Item 5
This Equipment Storage Room R2-13 will not be used for
combustible storage.
Item 6
Automatic sprinkler protection will be added in the
medical records room R2-16.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 3
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
C. General Comments
Item 1
The soffit material has been corrected to a non-
combustible soffit material as suggested.
Item 2
The exterior siding material has been changed to
comply with the revised Section 1705, paragraph (d)
quoted in this plan review letter.
D. Mechanical - First Floor
Item 3
Fire dampers have been provided in all ductwork
penetrating required rated walls in ceilings.
Item 11
We shall comply by submission of automatic sprinkler
shop drawings when they are available from the sub-
contractor.
E. Electrical - First Floor
Items 1, 2 & 5
Have been complied with.
F. Specifications
Item 2
Shall be corrected to comply with the reference Section
3318-f.
Item 3
No comment required.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 4
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Item 4 - Part 1
No comment required.
Item 4 - Part 2
Hardware for the Dutch Door will be corrected in order
to assure that it closes properly in accordance with
code requirements.
Item 5
Same as above Item 4 - part 2.
Item 6
These doors marked R1-34 and R1-35 will be corrected
as suggested.
Item 7
The equipment room locks will be provided with the
appropriate locking device to comply with code re-
quirements. A second exit will be provided from the
boiler room as required.
Item 8
As indicated in our letter to Mr. Ralph Karlberg,
Architect all the listed doors shown on this item
are correctly specified with the appropriate hardware
sets.
Item 9
Doors marked R2-08 will be corrected by the addition
of the appropriate exit device.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 5
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Item 10
No comment required.
SECTION II
Review for compliance with Uniform Building Code, 1973.
Item 1
No further comment required since evaluation is that the con-
struction typed as indicated on the drawings is in compliance
with the code.
Item 2
A. Sprinkler shop drawings will be submitted at the
appropriate time as required.
B. Portions of the new addition that are not sprinkled
are equipped with the required smoke detection devices.
C. New sprinkler main is connected to an existing sprinkler
line as shown on Sheet PFP-2. The height of the siamese
fire department connection shall be in compliance with
the Vail Fire Department requirement.
Item 3
A. All timber used in the timber construction above the roof
shall be fire retardant treated.
B. Since fire retardant treated lumber will be used as in-
dicated in A above, it is our consideration that it is
not required that the attic space be subdivided into
3,000 square foot areas.
C. Access to the attic space will be provided by labeled
roof hatch providing access through the concrete roof
structure.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 6
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Item 4
The openings on this court area in both the new addition and
the existing building will be properly protected in accordance
with Section 1903-B.
Item 5
A. General notes at door and borrowed lights, on Sheet A7
calls for all borrowed lights to have wire glass. We
are therefore in compliance.
D. Door types E & F shall be corrected to show impact
resistant glazing.
Item 6
All ductwork penetrating the indicated smokestop partition
here shall be provided with the required dampers, activated
by products of combustion.
Item 7
The Sec. 301-d--paragraph 2 quoted in your reference applies
for buildings, more than two stories in height and Groups
I & J occupanices therefore, are not applicable to this project.
Item 8
The existing roof construction is reinforced concrete and
the exposure from this indicated louver on sheet A3 is not
to any existing non-combustible construction or opening. We
see no requirement for the 3/4-hour dampers here.
Item 9
A. The quoted Sec. 1706-d refers to elevator shafts
extending to more than two stories. The elevator
shaft as detailed on sheet A9 does not extend to
more than two stories and therefore does not require
the ventilation as commented upon.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 7
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
B. The elevator door shall be fire rated in accordance
with the requirements of Section 1706-b.
Item 10
The quoted Section 3207-b refers to roof drains. Roof drains
are provided in accordance with the roof plans shown on sheet
A9 and as detailed on detail 18/9/5 on sheet A5. In addition,
we see no requirement for overflow drains or roof scuppers
since there are no parapet walls around the roof structure
as referenced in paragraph 3207-c.
Item 11
Doors marked R1/01 and R2/03 shall be corrected by providing
the required landing not more than 1" lower than the thres-
hold of the door.
Item 12
A. No comment required.
B. Exit signs shall be added at door 2/03. When this area
is finished additional exit signs and exit illumination
will be provided as required.
C. No comment required.
Item 13
No comment required as construction documents indicated compli-
ance therewith.
Item 14
Corrections will be made to comply with the comments of this
item.
Mr. Bill Pierce October 20, 1977
Chief Building Official Page 8
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Should you have any questions regarding any of the above
responses due to plan review comments please contact me.
Sincerely,
Dale R. Watson
DRW:lmo
cc: Chuck Tubbs, Administrator
Vail Valley Medical Center
S
-
• • •
• • ' • S
. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
•
•
DATE OF MEETING : September ?? , 1977 •
.
.
MEMBERS PRESENT: ..-2k3,-1,2,..,,,...--f----„ . •
.........___ _ . _
. . .
. -
. . .. .
• Lou Parker
Bill Bishop • .
Ron Todd • •
•
• 3,
•
ACT ION TAKEN � BY BOARD : _
•
•
• ' MOTION : SECONDED ..---
.
. • .
•
•
4
. ' ---'a21417.2.?J:Lf.Z..7 .
• ABSTE TIO�� : -
•
• • •
•
d .•
APPROVFD• )(„
DISAPPROVED:
SUl',1 M A IlY : ('''-'- -;•-,7';'-'- {- .,,,/,, - , - „, • ifd ',.; . '.:?'-.vf-_-
-��_� �..�g / , � r f -- ---/ �/ +��[Jpr / � ' "r � "/ - fir r : 4 2 ......++.+.�..m'.. ^..,'� / ..r. S lr'«6 � it
r � �
•t +....r.c..^..r.>+..+.. . wA ..m..+*+- .nw.aw....."""'. • , • �`" ...- '.'. ye,��.... «.....,,s. .-- _y„ -`
• • � . 'gam— ^ � � , r , .g ,._. _
, it; ,,,,,. �, ., t N.t r► d f fi r / �— .'^^"'. +.. .E ....
Septerter 15, 1977
Mt, Dale R. Watson, Architect
FREDERICK S. SCOTT
717 Office Parkway
St. Louis, Mo. 83141
Re: Alterations and Additions to
Vail Valley Medical Center, Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Watson:
Your letter dated August 15, 1977 responding to my letter of comments was re-
ceived along with a copy of a letter from Mr. Rasmussen of Gingery Associates,
Inc. After reviewing your letter and Mr. Rasmussen's letter of review', I
have the following comarvits:
ARCHITECTURAL - First Floor
............_,,,s,............________........,....„......,....,,..,_
2. In my opinion, corridor 1-24 is dead-ended at door 1/2L The distance from
the egress through door 1/40 to back to door 1/21 is in excess of 20 feet.
There is no exit sign over door 1/21 that indicates that through these door
would be an exit route„, Section 3304, (e), Access to Exits, states that it
must be possible to go either direction from any point In a corridor to a
separate exit, except for dead-ends not exceeding » feet. In that portion
of corridor 1-24 that I am saying is a dead there is only one way of
exiting and there must be two
In your letter, Cast Room 1-21 should have' been 1-23 and Toilet Room. 1-30
should have been 1-39.
9 We would still recommend the relocation of the door from clean in the
central sterile area. I feel that the dispatch room will be filled with carts
and the west wall of the room would be better used without a door opning. A
layout of room RI-63 showing how' moveable equipment will be located would be
helpful, not only to this office but to the owner.
13. The labor room equipped as an emergency delivery room would not be reuired,
Mr. Dale R. Watson, Architect
Spptenber 15, 197
Page 2
ARCHITECTURAL- First Floor (Cont d)
1E P re v i de a gyp ce i 11 fr, in the Fed ci ne prep room .r-;:i -105. The a. cous ti c
ceiling is not acceptable.
ARCHITECTURAL -3 Second Floor
3. With Oazing inst.Oled in the corridor partition„ the waiting area will
comply with WPA 1.01„ 1973. It is recomended that the door R2/05 to room
R205 be 0lazed also.
7. The transporting of Medical recurds by an for the regular admitted patient
will 'probably work out, but the question have is regarding the outpatient
ervice. For ithe, prompt movenent of records to. the outpatient department,
which in this facility will be w active or hcre should be a. mechanical
system for delivering these records. A pneumatic tube system of in 'adequate
size would be a time and stepsaver S 1 11CC the record department is remote
from this area. Administration of tile hospital should review this with the
inedical record departrvnt personnel to determine what problems v4ill en-
countered and possible solutions.
8. The dictating space shown is only for one doctor and ray be grossly inadequate
for the number of doctors on the staff. Additional space is :available for
more dictating booths and must be provided in a. room separate from other
spaces. This is required by ..anc!,,,rds. 'Sec. 4, Medical Records., Subsection
4.1.1(B).
GEIVRAL rOrillNIS
*..„.....,...,._.,,. ,.......,,,„.
3. This is to acknowledge receirt, of t radiation physicists report
MECHANICAL - First, Floor
,,,..,-..............
5. There . 1 s no code regal r etivnt to relocate - exhaust registers 1 n soi led roorn to
be over clinical flushing sinks. This is just good design in these areas to
provide exhaust in the most soiled area of these roons. As 1 stated, with
the relocation of the e.x registers, the :air flow will bye from the r4
clean to the roost; soiled, thus tiviting the. spread 0 f fouled. air it the
ti cui ar rocn
It is 'recomnded that the ex:Mimi condition, where an air intake, is in close
proximity 't.o an existing exhaust fan, be corrected as part of this project.
It will perhops be less expensiv e. to do it now team at sue future Cut!
should be considered by Administration and reviewed with them.
Mr. Dale R., WatIcA, ArcAtc:6;
Septembew i*:), 1977
Paqc 3
MECHANICAL - First For (Contr'd)
il. The entire laboratory must be provided with an iutomatic sprinkler syster‘
This is required in Sec. 3-4, rrotcctir;n in N7PP: 1973,
in addition, the extinguishing system nut b connected to the hospital
fire alarm system and must sound an alarm In the lab are as well as ouitsidc,
This conciudes roy COrMltS tC) your rasnonse letter'. PleasP include ail the re-
twired item 1PVT! "the le.;roject dnd give consideration to those item recommended.
When revised p'ians and specifications e,,re available, pleas fortr, orie copy
to this; r.ffice for firol r‘sitvie and aoproval.
O. Karlberg, Architect
tief, Design and Corutructien
Medical Care licensinri
Certification Division
cc: C1r1e r. rubbs, Aciministrator
'011liaf;1 Pierci::, Jr, CflO Vail Ca.
TO All Electric Contractors
Operating in Towns and Cities in Eagle County
Colorado.
NOTE: A Rough In Inspection must include setting of
all panels, circuit breakers and completion of
electric service.
At the time of Rough In Inspection, a Power Release
shall be issued for testing all electric components
Failure to comply will result in a re- inspection
fee of twelve (S12) dollars to inspect service
equipment when done separately from the Rough In.
This shall become effective as of April 1, 1978
Ed Hammer
Electric Inspector
(Please note, this notice wil no '. - - • :..e • �nti
approved by the County • �•,,� • In
Inspectors)
VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Gingery Associates, Inc.
Job No. 459.026
August 29, 1977
PROJECT DATA SHEET
General
Architect: HDI, Inc., Architects
Frederick S. Scott
Harry J. Varwig
Structural Engineer: Ditto
Mechanical Engineer: Ditto
Electrical Engineer: Ditto
Soils Engineer Lincoln-DeVore Testing Laboratory
Building Data
Use: Hospital and Offices
Occupancy: Groups D2 and F2
Construction: Type II
Number of Stories: 2
Fire Zone 3
Areas:
Additions 19409 S.F.
Existing Building 26741
Total 46150 S.F.
Occupant Load:
Second Floor
Addition
Office Space @ 100 S.F./Person 80 Persons
Mechanical @ 300 S.F./Person 4
Existing
Office Space @ 100 S.F./Person 58
Storage Areas @ 300 S.F./Person 4
Total 2nd Floor 146 Persons
Vail Valley Medical Center
Page Two
August 29, 1977
First Floor
Hospital Space @ 80 S.F./Person 353 Persons
Mechanical and Storage Space
@ 300 S.F./Person 7
Total 1st Floor 360 Persons
Total Occupant Load
(Existing plus addition) 506 Persons
Valuation
New Construction
Hospital Space: 10455 S.F. @ $70.00 = $ 731,850.00
Office Space: 8954 S.F. @ $30.00 = $ 268,620.00
Alterations to Existing Building:
Flat Rate: 26741 S.F. @ $10.00 = $ 267,410.00
$ 1,267,880.00
Permit Fee: 1,654.88
Plan Check Fee: 1,075.67
2,730.55
A Gingery Assoc/Wes, Inc.
DERYL W
ELMERL. CL
2840 SOUTH V4LLEJO STREET
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 LARRY Mt
4 z 4 : / c F 7 /8
TELEPHONE 303 761-4860
GLENWC
COLOR!' L SPRiNGS
303 ,- DO 8160!
i45-8676
August 29, 1977
Mr. Bill Pierce
Chief Building Official
Town of Vail
Post Office Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Vail Valley Medical Center
Plan Check for Compliance with Uniform Building Code
GAI Job No. 452.026
Dear Mr. Pierce:
In accordance with your request, the plans and specifications for
the subject project, as dated June 3, 1977 have been checked for
compliance with the Uniform Building Code, 1973 Edition.
We enclose herewith the following:
Project Data Sheet - General Building Data
Preliminary Report
Review for Occupancy, Type of Construction and Exit Require-
ments and for Compliance with Engineering Regulations.
Section I: Commentary on review by J. Ralph Karlberg,
dated July 18, 1977.
Section II: Additional commentary as to Code compliance
of Gingery Associates, Inc.
Under separate cover, we have transmitted marked up plans showing lo-
cation of all the Code violations cited. We will make our final plan
check as we receive the corrected plans.
CIVIL ENCINr_r LAN .YING /STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL /TRANSPORTATION / WATER & SANiTATION COTVIPUTCP, 3EA '
Mr. Bill Pierce
Page Two
August 29, 1977
If you have any questions, please contact us at any t_
Very truly your
GINGERY - INC.
- 4
Knud O. Rasmussen, P.E.
Project Engineer
KOR: skb
Enclosure
cc: Dale R. Watson
Hospital Building & Equipment Company
717 Office Parkway
St. Louis, Missouri 63141
Enclosure
J. Ralph Karlberg
Colorado Department of Health
4210 East llth Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
Enclosure
MEMORANDUM •
, TO: Planning Commission
FROM Department of Community Development
DATE June 30, 1977
RE: Vail Valley Medical Center
Request for Three Building Bulk Control Variances
A Parking Variance, a Conditional Use Permit
and a Vacation of of the property line
between Lots E and F, Vail Village 2nd Filing
for construction of an additional 8,700 sq. ft.
to the existing VVMC
(A) BUILDING BULK CONTROL VARIANCES (SECTION 18.18.100)
The Vail Valley Medical Center is requesting three building
bulk control variances: maximum wall length , building diaganol,
and building offsets.
PERMITTED PROPOSED
Wall Length 125' 128'
Diaganol 160' . 300'
Offset 1'/5' over 50' 128' wino offset
CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS FOR THE VARIANCES (SECTION 18.62.060)
The proposed addition is in an MDMF zone with the Professional
Building on one side and the Hilton inn on the other. Due to the
high intensity use of these buildings and the already high intensity use
of the medical center, the proposed addition should create no additional
adverse impacts on this area.
The degree to which relief from t.1 strict or literal interpre
tation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary
to achicve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among
sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this or-
dinance without grant ()f special privilege
The Vail Valley Modica] Center is a unique entity in Vail,
The reason for the bulk control variance request is to permit
more efficient utilization of space within tho hospital complex.
We, therefore, do not feel that theso rquests would be grants of
special privilee
The effect of the requested variances on light and air, distri-
bution of population, transportation -and traffic facilities,
public facilities, and utilities and public safety.
We scc no adverse impacts on the above factors. The proposed
addition should not have any negative impacts on surrounding
property owners or uses.
FINDINGS:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant
of special provilege inconsistent with the limitations on
other properties classified in the same district.
See Items 1 and 2 under Consideration of Factors,
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare, or mater ally
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
See item 3 under Consideration of Factors.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the site of the variance that
do not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone,
See Item 2 under Consideration of Factors
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
of the requested variances to allow for the most efficient operation
of the new addition to the Vail Valley Medical Center.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (SECTION 18,18.030(b)
In an MDMF zone, one of the accepted conditional uses is
for "hospitals Medical and Dental Clinics and Medical Centers".
The proposed addition to the existing medical center fits within
this category.
Upon review of Section 18.60,0GO "Criteria and Findings", the
Department of Community Development recommends approval of the
Conditional Use Permit based upon the following factors:
Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives
of the Town.
One of the primary goals of the Town is to provide the best
health services possible to both the visitors and permanent population,
The proposed expansion of the medical center would work towards
this objective,
The effect of the use on light and air, distribution or
population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools,
parks and recreation facilities and other public facilities
and public facilities needs,
The proposed addition should have no adverse effects on the
items listed above.
Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion,
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic
flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow
from the street and parking areas.
Along with the proposed addition is a relocation of the main
entrance of the hospital to the west of the existing building.
The parking lot on the south side of the existing building (along
West Meadow Drive) will be removed. This will further separate the
cars using the medical facility from nearby residences It will
also allow for better circulation in and around the Medical Center.
Effect upon the character of the ai'ea in which the proposed
use is to be located..,in relation to surrounding uses.
The two building located adjacent to the Medical Center are
the Professional Building and the Hilton Inn. On the south side
of the Medical Center are a few scattered residences The
addition to the existing Medical Center should have no significant
effect on these uses.
Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems
applicable to the proposed use.
No other factors should be considered.
No environmental impact report is re4uired.
The Department of Community Development recommends that the
Conditional Use Permit be approved based on the following findings.
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accord with
the purposes of this ordinance and the purposes of the
district in which the site is located.
2, That the proposed location of the use and the conditions
under which it would be operated or maintained will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare
or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of this ordinance.
- PARKING VARIANCE (SECTION 18 18 140)
In a MDMF zone, 50% of the required parking spaces must be
covered, The Vail Valley Medical Center proposed 138 parking
spaces in its new plan, with none of them covered. The actural
number of parking spaces required by the zoning ordinance is not
specified for this project. The proposed number of spaces does
conform with national standard for this type of facility.
CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS (SECTION 18.62.060)
The relationship of the requested variance to other
existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The new parking lot is a relocatio of an existing parking lot
and therefore should create no new adverse impacts on surrounding
structures or uses. The removal of the parking space along West
Meadow Drive should have a positive impact on residences in that
area.
The degree of which relief from the strict or literal
interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation
i5 necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the
objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege,
Since an existing uncovered parking lot is being moved
to another location, we do not feel that it should be
necessary to cover 50% of the new lot. The new parking
arrangement will also provide better access to the site.
The effect of the requested variance on light and air,
distribution of population, transportation and trffic
facilities, public facilities and utilities, and
public safety.
We see no adverse impact on the above factors,
FINDINGS:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
on other properties classified in the same district.
See Item 2 under Consideration of Factors
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
See Item 1 under Consideration of Factors
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following
reasons:
(a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement
of the specified regulation would result in practical
difficulty or unnecess ry physical hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of this ordinance.
Since the parking lot is being relocated: it would be a hardship
to require the applicant to cover the new lot whereas the previous
lot was not covered,
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
of the parking variance.
VACATION OF LOT LINE BETWEEN LOTS E & F VAIL VILLAGE 2nd FILING
The Vail Valley Medical Center presently owns Lot E and has
an agreement to purchase Lot F. The request would allow for the
treatment of Lots E & F as one site, oncethe land has been purchased.
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
of this request to permit development of the expanded medical center
on both lots.
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUMMARY
June 23, 1977 •
MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT:
Abbott, Drager
Garton Todd
Hanlon - late
Mills STAFF PRESENT: Toughill
White Kramer
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED TOWN OF*VAIL PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
Terry Minger gave a brief description of the Town's criteria for
selection of the proposed public works facility, including location,
cost per acreage, utility location and cost, and how it will relate
as a "good neighbor", He went through each of the four major
contenders (Pulis, Selby/Tofel Elmore, and McAllister) and stated that
the Town was leaning toward the Pulis site even though it was a
very visable site. Gerry White mentioned the New Electric building
and land as well as the site east of the Mountain Bell building as
possible alternatives. Kent Rose spoke to the disadvantages of both
of those sites.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
June 2 & 9, 1977 -- Dudley Abbott made a motion to approve; Pam
Garton seconded the motion, A unanimous vote was recorded. APPROVED
June 16, 1977 - Dudley Abbott made a motion to approve, Pam
Garton seconded the motion, A unanimous vote was recorded. APPROVED
VAIL INSTITUTE TENT --- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -- PRELIMINARY REVIEW
It was noted that the Tent needs to be erected by July 3 and the
formal hearing for the tent is not until July 7. The Vail Institute
would like a preliminary approval from the Planning Commission at this
time. Pam Garton made a motion for preliminary approval ; Sandy Mills
seconded the motion. A unanimous vote was recorded. APPROVED PRELIMINARILY
J.R. ELIAS -- GRFA VARIANCE
Attached is the staff memorandum giving a complete description of the
request and reasons for the request. It was noted that the problem that
occured last week was due to the figures being based on floor area ratio
rather than on grfa making the house much bigger than reality. Those
figures have been corrected.
•
The house, as it presently exists, is a legal non-conforming use
due to the fact that is was built under the old zoning ordinance grfa
calculations.
Pam Garton felt that this request, if granted, .would be a grant of
special privilege without any strong technical reasons for hardship,
and that a negative precedent would be set in this neighborhood if the
requestwere granted. This was the general feeling of the Vnole
Planning Commission. Pam Garton made a motion to disapprove the
request Dudley Abbott seconded the motion. A unanimous vote was
recorded. DISAPPROVED.
Request for vacation of property line between Lots A-8 & A-9,
Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 1
The applicant, Deane Knox as represented by Hal Engstrom, would like
to join properties with Leo Payne in order to have a cluster housing
develo7ment consisting of eight duplexes and one triplex. The
vacation is needed because under the present plan, one of the duplexes
would rest right on the property line, if the vacation was not granted
the applicants would loose only one unit Diana Toughill felt that
the trade off of one additional unit was worth it due to the proposed
cohesive development plan. D. Abbott made a motion for approval;
Garton seconded the motion. A unanimous vote was recorded, APPROVED
-CORNICE BUILDING REQUEST TO REZONE FROM HDMF TO CCI
It was noted by Mike Palmer, the applicant, that the primary reason
for the request was financial. The Planning Commission felt that
there was no justification for the rezoning because the Cornice
Building was not contiguous to CCI and the pedestrian area. It was
surrounded by PA and HDMF zoning. If this request was granted,
the issue of spot zoning would become apparent with no logical reason.
Bill Hanlon felt that if this building was commercial pedestrian
traffic would be increased on an already bad corner and could develop
into a safety hazard, The applicant felt that with the parking
structure and the proximity of the Blue Cow that the Cornice Building
lent itself to a commercial use. Dudley Abbott felt that the
horizontal zoning ordinance in CCI might be more restrictive to the
applicant than his present HDMF zoning.
Due to the fact that the Planning Commission could find no justification
fol. the rezoning, Pam Garton made a motion to deny the request;
Sandy Mills seconded the motion ; A unanimous vote was recorded.
DISAPPROVED.
As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned.
. _
•
t
ti ::i ■ , A) :1 "CI r) 'CI : 11.3 -.
p 1 0 0 P"'"3
ri") ,--,, 0 ri "'' er, 1 .. • ri . ,,,..• 0-. :-. -'
::$ ,S sa, -," -. " - 0 '.. C.'
‘,.,., im (7.
U.. + _ r m,...., - (.--. ...,- (1) - • ,.-( ,., i--t,,) .. ,....
,-,- ..,
,•••• .... , ,
......t1 .-..-1. — ,-- ,-, ...,
, ,,--
C) et, (.; <
.....• /...... r) ... , a n -. '-'• ' 7.- ri - ,•-_, ,-... -.....-- r , ,a. , ,...,
• tTi
0 '"',
0 — <,-
.-- K --; ci- .1..1 c...-, 7-3. -:--. .-e
,,•-.) ,-,, I d o ,
ro
c - • t.i :,-2-. - r- ,,,..,.., 0.,
-
..) (,' 7.,- :-- : ,-
•cr
..., c r
r) rt,
.1
P.,, .--, ■-.- r ' ,-:,
u - :: . ft> rt
'
a 0 Ca.
,....-
.....
>-,-, ^ 0
cn
....... r.,) L. ,
tn
,,- n
...--- (...._, :-,- :., -..) -„, r, , ,-- .., , ,---- -- .::.... i\,, •
( 0 . ;-" --• - ;"-: 7 1 -1 :-" '',, i - 7
0 .-: ri
... - V m CD '7, (- :_._ ''' :7 ..., 1 .... ' I /.....
rt, -I a .., ..,
C.-- PI ,,, . C, ,./, cf , P fD ( i ) < ,
CL v "
PI ::.7 c D 1- "`" C ...., -- < cif, ,...
.7.:
,..
CD .e.
0 <
(\-\ 0 ,....--
r.n ..t
-. cf. .; .... „..„... „.„. c ....
I' F.
x ... E. a. ..,, s< 0 .-- •,, zi .) '-- ,,, .., A ,
,...,... p-, ., -- - *.:.. --,
a. ,,.. 7 crcl ,-, -4, ,-, ,..,. - r) ,..,-• ,
,-, , n
....•
.,
,-,
:-...-. ,... , c
m — F.... , r_s_ ,,, --- '. - 4 c -. 7 , — S --- t
et) ,,,, ,-* •-•< .7r 'a . . ::.; a, '-') '.... ,„,
›.. ,
v)
0 Z * ', ro ''' = --'
cr a, 0 CI. Cr 0 p-, --.• ..r. , ".") r: .....:,
. ,_.. ... , 'cl __,.,
',....„ eo
,, ,...., .1
1.3. ,...+-
,......
> .. rt, ,-,... Cf::, c.7..) , ..-- - .
• '-)
,--- ,--t -.- • (--- -t -.. ci..„. ,•,,. c.. " . t
I ' 0 °,....)
...,
,
..•4
.,2_ \ 2 :, r., --4 -, - ,..-• .7.7; ,•,
....... r) ,..4., - - .....,
e - 0 rD ' .) ,.., --.'
,-, .....• ,,; ,,,
P NJ c .,_: ,
CI. ,..,
ft) •
ft, i......1 ...
-- r " P C ) 57 `', C-. '---. , , -. .,,
0 ,.. c —
:--, 'I_ ( ' - '2 ' "*". ,-, , >
- ,
(_ _ :' 7) ...., -
,,,- E , , , .. - . • :-.5 '''-' .-' 1 \ ' " ' - ' ' ' .". 2
B ...,..\ .....;
/ `tip (0
, ,....,_ ,..
F..1' (•,- rD " C; 2... '7 ,,:, '1 '--:
El ti
,..,.. —, I .„ .., a, , _. f,.., iz's H 7. • ---.J
.1.... 2
PO C6) . '"..1 i \\ ,
:;. *1 7 :: . '' ' . . , , F ..* . ...7 frCi . Z:: i'l 4
V
7.1
= 1 *
, ..., ''' 1
t., ,.., ......s. '14 ...4 e, ,..... :: ...4 :. - , • I> 1 f
0 0 is-, .,- . . ,._. e.,., ,-, • .,...„-_,, .-f- .., p- , — r",
ll t-14 C.
P., (0 - ...... .C$ ... . .%, ,,. .., c'' :-) t 1 '
c- r) t < '' Cs :-..., C! ,-- * i--.- 2 .' s, ' : r°::
C1.1. `'. r :--;' ‘... rr
,...
,,,... .
.....,..„.' E .,,,,,, , ;,,• ::]c 0 ,1 , 7 , ' E . Q:d ..,„..
Eti. 1......1
> , 1 rt. I r) eD c D
)....0
"CI "Ci
1 <
--) , — . ,....... --, --• -, w
2 -, . c .,-
,,,, - , f. — '..T
ro u)
cr)
- .r.r,
O P CS
• W n
`""i b--t
'7, .,-,- ,• -
0.•
,-- cr
r- \ : ' -, c - ( = 3
7 '
4-, r- — cie
,-, ■-t ..,:s '.::,,
c:.
t-'-,
cf: ,-,-, • cn
$ c) 0
---,. - ...: = .,.-,
,
a, rt,
•.,
cr) cr.) .'7' cf) ,.. , --c , n 0 , .
. I .":1 '''' . rzS 0 ..... p•-, ,-, ' '
,..., ..,
,-,-,,,, ' ......, 7"----• , '''''' t" 1) ro
CI, ......3 0 ,...- rt) ..,.. .--, ,
1.1 \
- \ _,,1:______,-- c-- .77 C --• < c, r„,, , , r:, ,..,-
CO k
.....•
- ..r. zr-, - • ......./
Nim. • r:, rt - • /".:, ..-c; 0 .-• ,.....
c• c, ,_
-7 ,, , ,.., -• r;„ ,-;., .,.•
vi.\..k. , ''''' k., ro P 0 '.:.,' - , ,,,...,‘ =" •-, .1
\\C)
'1 -, ..e.
< ,-*
,,,, a ; CL :../- ft ., . - ...-- ,S r..., , , m. - ..---,
- ro „ 1 .11 - r-, ■T-1 0:, -, ,,
/.." 0 0 , '''') cD - , -• r.' - es- -=''',.• (< '',4
--.-
> -•,- -
, -.....
. - ' ,.. • '" 1,7t1 7.1"- ,...... ,..... , -
CI) C. ...,... . - . • .' ' c-I- '
'''''''.......,„.......,
., " ',.. 0 .c -,-. , fri
0 \t::, () ,..., -.. Cro.
. :'-) '-) ....; (t. • , - - *' ;•••,..)
...t ,---
(-,
0
,-, :.----:-. —
e r\ \ --L "' ca, r r .---- ''''' ........., ., ,..,_ 7...-:.: ,. .,,,, ,,,,:., 7. ,
< -> ,-- 9 ,..,--
\ cr.) tr -
,..,.) a,
t<!, a. rD .....
tn
0-... , .-1
.-, '--.. et, , ,..• ,....., ,.... r, ' n n
o ,.....,- „, ,..,
rvi 5-,
.:,.. h co I P-1-•• CL c- ro a. c-,
.)
1^)
> a - r) cl• 0 .
c ,, , , ,
, .. 0 - ,
cY 6 .... , .-" o _ ,,. :.,. , z -.
A - L, cz .., ,-- -•-• -..., - 2'. -3 ::: --. f ' 1
- 7.^ - • -' •-• -.
:, ..-.-.• .. ..., - -_, C., ,.... 3 ,-_, ,, .1 , (-) - ' - -' ..... ..::: (''') ,.
,..., ,,.
,..).
- (J , , , -• ,,,, ,‘, ,,, ,,, .,, ,-- 3, , :- - ..„. --
.5' c., c. ,,, ,.. 4. 4 ,.., 0 < • , , , _ -
-
--i 0 C • .73 :6,
-7- - , , 2,
, 5 ,,, ,...; •,: -I ,.... .... I . -; r_ ' -- > :,-- .:-.; - .-1 , - ; :`, ',2 D - . ,
c .,, , :, ,, , ,,,, ,-, . , - , ,-, .,...• - i ..- :-_-, -, -,- (..., ,
_ - -", -,
c..-,' • .., --- " ' ' ' ,' 7 _ ,-.'
- N - 1 0 F. .:-, • -- _ ...,. , -,... •-•(
-',1 -.., c , _
■ t , C
, _ , rr, ,- ' -• -• ' , --- r ' - ,'; .
0 . P ' r ,-• .- - !
... ,
, , .. 7,-, r - : -- '---- = :".::, 1 ' • 17 ' L' ; ' -: ,..: " ''- ) :
, ct. „, Jr, ... ...-,. ,-, ,. , - - -,, -. , , , , - ci.: - -. ..,. c •-, , z A
:::, - c e, r" -,• 4 • - - (..., -- c,., -,,-: p : ',.. , - e. ",', ,-, 7.2._ ,,, •
0 E,, • 0 i c; 7. -, ::: - 0 ,I, 6 7.1 -, :, ( •:` , - 0 , * ,, ,Z, , v . '
4 0 , i , , i- ,_ t .j; ,,,, Si , • :-. 9 5 st:
...., i = z. L. , Q.) . 0 3
e
Frederick S. Scott
717 Office Parkway
St. Louis, Mo. 63141
Phone 314. 567-9000
June 14, 1977
Mr. William Pierce
Building Inspector
Town of Vail
P.O. Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81645
Reference: Vail Valley Medical Center
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Pierce:
It is my understanding from our recent conversation in your office that
following Mr. Rasmussen's review of the drawings for the Town of Vail
that we will incorporate any code required changes to the drawings.
Following any necessary changes to the drawings, we will then file an
application and pay for a building permit.
Please advise me at your earliest convenience as to the required plan
check fee and we will forward this to you.
Sincerely,
Dale R. Watson
DRW:gd
cc: Chuck Tubbs, Administrator
Vail Valley Medical Center
Frederick S. Scott Architect
717 Office Parkway
St Louis, Ma, 63141
Phone 314-567-9000
June 14, 1977
Mr. William Pierce
Building Inspector
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81645
Reference: Vail Valley Medical Center
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Pierce:
This letter will confirm that I delivered to your office one set of
working drawings and specifications dated June 3, 1977. These drawings
are for your review and approval.
Attached is a copy of a letter to Knud Rasmussen indicating that we
delivered two sets of drawings and specifications and one set of
structural calculations to him for review. It is my understanding
that his review will be for the Town of Vail.
Further, I am mailing under separate cover the soil boring information
for therroject.
Sincerely,
Dale R. Watson
DRW:gd
cc: Chuck Tubbs, Administrator
Vail Valley Medical Center
s . Sco r;
Si ;_o.w;, Mc.
ts 7
June 14, 1977
Mr. Knud Rasmussen, P.E.
Gingery Ascciates, Inc.
2840 South Vallejo Street
'Engle‘=;ood, Colorado 8011
Reference: Vail Valley Medical Center
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Rasmussen:
This letter will confirm that on June 9, 1977 I^ delivered to your office
two sets of drawings and specifications dated June 3, 1977, and c set
of structural calculations. These drawings are for your review as
requested by the Town of Vail.
Enclosed herewith is one set of soil boring data which we recently received
from the owner.
We would appreciate receiving your review commer.:s on this project in order
that they may be ip_orporated into the drns Eo Cri-lt a building pe
may be issued by the Town of Vnil for this project.
Sincerely,
Dale R. Watson
DRW:gd
cc: Chuck Tubbs, Ae,miniqtlral=
Vail Valley nedical Center
,7
Mr. Dale R, Watson, Architect
FREDERICK S. SCOTT
717 Office Parkway
St. Louis, Mo. 63141
Re: Alterations and Additions to
Vail Valley Medical Center, Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Watson:
The plans and specifications for the above-named project have bee l reviewed,
and It have the following conrients:
ARCHITECTURAL - First Floor
1. Provide a hand sink in janitors closets 1-4i, 1-45 and R1-62 conplete
with soap and hand-drying facilities.
2. Relocate door 1-21 in corridor 1-24 so a dead-end of greater than 20 feet
does not exist. Be certain that all or opening or exit corridoesare
approved 20-minute doors.
3. It is recommended that the north end of corridor 1-25 beyond the doors to
treatment rooms 1-27 and 128 be enclosed for additlIal storage space.
4. A fire-rated roll-down door, or other approved closure, must be provided
over the counter in office, room 1-04. it w discussed at our meeting
that the wall to the clshier area be dehted so this entire area is open
to the corridor. This requires the east wall at the cashier's space to
become the corridor wall that musttr continued to the deck above,„
5. The following rooms must be provided with a soot h washable c,Aling
Treatment and Cardio 1-n
Cast Room 1-23
Light Cast Room 1-22
Dark or 1-18
anitors' closets 1-41 and 1-45
Clean Utility 1-42
Silt - td Utility 1-40
Toilet Room 1-39
Mr. Dale R. Watson, Architect
July IS, 1971
Page 2.
ARCHITECTURAL - First Floor (Cont'd)
6. The smoke stop partition mo“ have dry wIall on both sides to weet the
requirements of a I-hour partition in accordance AO the 1973 Life Snfty
Code. Correct this on symbol !(ft.rnd on Sheet A2 to match specifications
Scc.9..I, pg 3.
7. The existing Incinerator does not met air pollotion control r&juirements
and must be replacd or corrected to meft the necessary standards. This
has been determined by field tsptntion. A copy of the report is availablo
uport request. It is recommended that the incinerator be relocated to the
outside of the building.
b. With the institllation of the new partition in corridor R1-22 to provide
new lab office, a dead-end corridor Is created. The dead-end corridor is
from corridor P1-49 back to the Oewttor. This will have. to be changed
to prevent his
). ROocate door R1-15 in cledn-up roor R1-52, to the 3outh wall of this roorn
30 equipment that has been cleaned can be taken to the autoclave without
going through th e. dispatch area.
10. Be. certaiu that the autoclave in the Central Sterile Room is equipped with
a rnording thermrsmeter.
11. There is no provision made for anesthesia storag or an anesthesia work room
in the surgical/deliver suite. If flammable anesthesia will not be used,
the anestheAa storage . room will lot he required. Hoever, a resolutiw
prohibiting the use. o' flammables in designated areas must be plssed by the
hoard and the areas posted accordingly.
An anesthesia worl., room must. be rmvided eQuipl,ed Atb a work counter and
sinL.
12. DeietP the door 1.11.4t connects the scrub area with the sub room.,
and cTose the opening.
13. The labor room, must be equipped for emergency delivery. T for
scrub-up and lighting will have to be made
14, Provide drinking fountains so. they Are accessible and usable by the phy-
ically handicapped. Drinking fountains shown arc in alcoves that are
narrower than the width of a wheelchair and this is not acceptable. The
drinking fountain or electric water cooler should be from. 30 to 36 inches
above the floor and appropriate. for use by the handicapped,
Ir. Dal . Wai:s6n, Architit
,kiy
Paq 3.
ARCHITECT!AAL - First Floor (1:44
15. The meAlcine prep ro4::.till Acostic
tile 1 no ac.cw„ItIbl,
16. Th L following rooms nuit have a smooth washaDle surface such as drrwall.
The acousLical tile shown on the schedule is not acceptable. Rooms RI-52,
57,, 6'3,
107.
1 have NOt been able to locate the follawlop roms that appear on thP
-47A, 6SA u t I Picase enllOten me.
17. It is hiqhly recomwended that a lavatory De provided lo each X-Ray row for
the preparation ot solutions tisee to treat patients and for handwashing. As
siouwil on th diawings. the nearest source of water would be t lavatory
in the patient toilet room adjacent to thQ dressIng cubicles.
It is recomvended that a door frofii thc, Fluor/X-ey room to fl adjrent toilet
VOGM b proviiied,
ARCHITIrTURAL
• Scd rio4,71
1. ilocir i-tL - to stair restricts the exit wicth to loss than tne required
44 Inche between the cioor ana the hndrai 1 nc1osed setch.
2. RE:co4ond relocatinc -C,i9 further south ir corridor k2 -10 to proviie
trE spac. i- door to class room to opposite end of this roo.
34 ThE waitilig area on this floor rut be deleted or enclosed by 1-hour cor-
structioN. The Life Safety Code, NFPA 01-173, T)rohibits waitinri areas
stAe corri-cor unless ta2T are provicied witn uirert supervisiorl.
Sec. 10 -1331,Exception No 3.
4* leicreii i ti 0or an 21 t. 32 inches so these toilet facilitic
are uswJe by tha p4ysically haridicapped. It is recommend tht the toilet
partitioris in ti rooms (ieleted so they not nave to bP made to
net i6 requireetts for tile NeJ't
bar ilat sLools io ( t tne 1 :S1
arid aisc
5. Wi1i Equipment Store R2 -1'3 orovide for rowbustitie c If combustible
stora,le is to be located in this room, room will have to be sprinkiere.
Mr. LL al R.
jviy IR, 1977
- 1 'Or' C*0 t!
6. Tij edical record wiil to r clrovije t n autoatic inrinkier
system if mdical recor both acttlo t there,
Life Safety Code 1973, S la111,
7. HOW will medical records be transported form the medical records department
to the first floor easily 1 n eFficintly 411.n t tor bein
iole t ?
Ihould be a '-':',„ii,!oo.rate area cJt off fron tle library to
prnvile priTtlt for the doctors.
9 „ ki1,1 c ! rio v
(
OVOt.
Tie ,707 1 rtin7„ It wri OP
th s wit cf9 t Tablrial s.
2, The vertical wood siding shown on the drawings is prohibited by the Uniform
Bdildiag Coda whera it cxceds the maxiTum of being 15 feet above the vride.
5:2e si?.c. 1705, p':'r3 .(1), 1 41111s FrontinQ on Streeti or lardF, sub-para. 2,
t..!.B,C. 197F, Vi oad Sid 05 thc walls less than 15 feet in height would
acceptable„.
3 Piasf subirit a coy cf ti raiation rec n th h1 ld1nr7 rt
cu1: 1i tie v.dte.
4. Be ccrtzrin th3t the blood r4fr1 lerat3r is ci thz pc?r sciArce.
MECHANICAL - First Fionr
1. The., mecriani cal firaviings were nc,t, ccrTir so ry ts 11 11 be s
t:nfs Vre
2. Provide return air in the Radiology Office„. Room 1-21, the Dark Room 1-16,
C t 1 t),:e 1 d i P rc v dc, xin 'Fr m t
3. c(1,Ttairi to provtti fl re dampers in ductwork DEnctratinq fl r wils
rte: ceilins an4
uui tVil
rr (
k.1 kk, .•
4. rerovide vertilaticn ir; the! new :, vcrk room Ind mei ci prop
5. Locate the exhaust registr ove,r th clirical sinks in the Soiled Utility
Room 1 in Clean-Up Room R1-53 and Recovery Room R1-71. This would
also be true for the Clean-Up Room Pi -60 in the surgical sllite_ thc,
rAocation of the exhaust regis tne supply registers will tc be
riocatad that air Flay! , 41J1 be from Li e cleari area to tha most
soiled.
6. Pr/i3 an adlitiolal exhaust outlat in each operating room. The outlet
must be provided at not less than 4 inches above the flor. Be certain
that tr; ara at loa aIr changs per hour in the 0.. rooms.
7. Provid :an exhaust over th autocldva in the centrdl supply area to prevent
condttnt1:71n from collecting on the walls and celling
C. T haust rf 11 I th will i.A! jSed for
d1 'ric must be 70cated at or inces above the !loor.
9. certain that fresh air intakes art. not less than 25 feet from any and
all cxhaut outict3 and at least 3 fet above grade. This woulc:. be yi:xy
iqportnt wherz t!T exh3ust fie3;lrator is locata.
10, A detdled drawing of NV -4 was not provided showing tht the fira) fliter:;
are located dcmnstream f tho 7sn 7.nd cork, Ti s wou7;'d hc tru for ANU
air 1:Thich :flerves ats,
11. 3i4bmit the shop drawing for the automatic sprinkler system to this Department
fr revir:.w anl approv61 prior to installation. Also, the sprinier
b7 coordin7itld fire zoris arG C&i same.
Be certain all areas in the laborat.ory are cevered by the sprinklcr yst.cm.
Drawinq PFP -3 show thtt 1 1acteriolosy Roon R1-23 is not sprink'";cr, so
the janitor's closet 14 1.7ickm; Ft sprinkler he3d.
MECHANICAL - Second Floor
jo coments.
ELECTICAL :,: i rste Floor
1. On sheet E5 provide an additional 2xit sign Ok the west side of the corridor
doors that separate R1-04 frour: -11.
r. ArchitcL
1977
- Fi
2t Proviuff: t the 4 co, the fy'r, tir
t3 the ExtericT.
3. Coorlect sone of the exterior lighting fixtures, and the canopy at the
wergencv entry arvi thc main to the omersisory nowPr sour( . Tt
r toes , 7 , 1itries 70'
4. Be certaln olectrical WC rk installed in acc.ordance With the '11.E.C,,
76, This bacn adoPt.'1 by the C State
5. Provide xit signs In the surgery suit, at the two surocry suite dos
6. Huvt., light tck av;:i located no more thtm 4 ihev*s
abov tht floor.
L' fl* ; •
L -
No commnts.
SPECIFICATIpMS
1. Be certain to have the parking spaces for the handicapped painted or signed
to indicate they are for the handicapped.
2. hardware group 26 for the 11/2,-hour *6' label door to stair 'A' must be an
exit device and not a lock.
3. Hardware for door R1-14 must be such that personnel can exit through this door
all times. The lock specified for this door would prevent this
4. Ekirdware for doors RI-17 and R1-16 must be latches that will hold doors in a
c]csez! pcsition in acordance Idth - 1)73. Locks on corridor doors
are not acceptable. Verify this with other doors that open onto exit corr
dors.
Be ccrtaln that Lhe citutcn door iZ1 -16 is SJCil that when the closer ;:.itctivates and
clos the upper half of the door, the lower half closes also.
S. dutch ,wer -23 All require rttchlikt on both halvts cf dtwr lnd the
dw,r ij.eiqncd !,-to itliat when tte tippi:::!r hair is closed the lower half closes is
1C,r i r.110
most
emmende.,:; rollur I ;itches b rtiJ ed. The rolcr latches for ;4
c'iuld be 3cated at ti tcp the door to to the hea O the oor
PrfAH,:; co( 71-7f RI
, ),r; r,cm
alwayv, out of
;it , rust; be proviJfcd from ei bcl 1r roorri remte from the first.
'3 1Q5 icorE; njnc onto xit corridors IBUSti latching: nriwre mne1y ,
06 , 07, r IC id ama 27
tc n„tair rust hav a xit vice P lock is
10 ii7ris with raised letters ad locAtect on the corridor wall at the
doors b,k, 4 foot iorbes arid. - foot 6 inches abnve the firt1siw.1 door.
11 urtal n tha t tme teri ize rs eq 4I p d wi t rz thEri”oniciteri
as wa mentioned befOrE.
12. ceroin to v'rt f c f plastic pipe in this facility and comply wit'
the Colorado Ueoartment '3f Health Plumbiog Code 1972. For clarification of
Lha code, call r1r. C3r1 kj .t.Ate plJmhing In;pectof* of tlis departmewL
P3lypropy 11 :1 fliPQ is acceptable 'kr acid w,474,:,:te and vcfnt which
is specifie.
13. Tie , 21ectrice, specificatiool wake veferc;nre tD explosiol -proof switeles. Are
to be areas , .1ere, explosion-proof switches are to be provided and where
aice thi,se areas? Fri the finisiI schedul, conductive flooring is not beinp
vid th.
Ptin udes conts n tho pl3! sabmittL ft re„Irkri.
p,1 tit? iefar',,Du5 11(.17,rpordtta? iAto
prf)jii: oi ve cosidrtior , to 1112 rectAt.,:m?nd;:qtrls
rorwa( art' for oJr reii
19 1 „,
1,1-ct
h2uy 1 177
if yot. g'„„iiestloiv:" p tcL kow
'Ancrely,
J . Ralph Kariberq, Architect
Cif, ,7 :,esinn end Constructio
Medical Care Licensinci arA
CeTtification 'Avisiv
ft Charles F. Tubbs, ii,dministratcr
Vail Building Dpartment!
1
IMININI
\ 44"
� � IIJ: FFES ALIG+ \VL�
1
FLocD2 .
VAILVALLEY METD1C.AL Ca
V 4. ,Cc-tx).
7 (77
° DESIGN REV _LEW iivi\ It!)
__----..._._._..........___._
. I
DATE OF
) , I
MEMBERS PRESENT:
. , ............_....................._............_ •
t b
6,4t,i1
, .
-,
-• ..
.
.
.
. j
SUBJECT :
6 , 6,..OSLI V, f'Ai.,,,_1.- .9 v
- _ I
a i f e l ici _L- .
(- jcwcli eiito-- A ...__, f v4. 4) — ,
1 tC11,
ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD : 0 i
. ,
MOTION: SECONDED BY:
VOTE: FOR : AGAINST
_....,...,..............-................................................
•
_
..................................-___-
k.
V lt ' d/ dtti 7 ' ,I 73
ABSTENT I ON :
..................._................................._._.................... •
. '
L .__ ....._...... ,........_...............____________.
APPROVED:
DI 8 APP ROVED :
SUMMARY : )
- i (VI
l'.
,
i f nc , / 1 j I i ,, , , , . ' " ) --*/"/ 4 ' 6- 7-
i 21 1 , , . I _., g t 1 C ..(f i , ( C' i
--. I / i . / l'i
-1)11tli c----_____ C7( / r 1.__
----- (
/ V \
..„- , \ /
.., ) ,,,,
\ --- i
\ /
, 7 , „ _
- '
......./... /
__
--ciaTTETipi 0 f --- C l i T . - - - - i i - - - 0 - : 1 .7,( i - -- A p 1 i i
) - c a n t //
•
1/6 _A Ler i 6- / i
'---------_
/ / /
i )/ ii2
. 1 -
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the Vail Valley Medical Center
has applied for a Conditional Use permit as provided for in Article
18 of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973, as amended, in order to
construct a hospital addition in a Medium Density Zone District.
NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that the Vail Valley Medical Center
has applied for variances from Sections 5-506, 5-510, and 5-300,
(building bulk control) e.
a vacation of lot lines between Lots E & F. •-.:-
• s- • :-- tt-e *a.- -. of
Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973 (The Zoning Ordinance), as amended
in order to construct a hospital addition.
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section
21.500 of the Zoning Ordinance on June 30, 1977 at 3:00 PM before
the Town of Vail Planning Commission whose decision will be transmitted
to the Town Council for final decision. Said hearing will be held
in the Vail Municipal Building.
DEPART ENT OF
COMMUAATY DEVELOPME
&
4iana S. Toughill
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail June 10, 1977
•
•
...
- t
, 1
n cf)
... .-,. 0 n r; --, 7/ :: -- c.: 0 .7i. g
..-, 0 '-°-
D 1 p.--, 0 - --, , r_...) -tp .,-- 0 4 —
4 - -14 1 '--- ,...., -i .,,,,,,
Cr cn ::•-• ,...... r,-, , 4-‘
rz, ..., . , r-t- 1 --
P : • . , z' :-.,.- -• • ,
c .,.. ../ •,-, , .> ,.., , „ .... ;-_ 4,.. ,.,:, i d
Z '..1
ir-i- , - • .... IT, ri:
- .. .-..- '•'' a. C ■ t
r) eD I r) a ,-.: ...... r's •,-..-.! :•..,
s ", - ;.: u„,- ta, -' - - -- c'-• -
at'A '1:1 c.,.:, ;-; ,---- ;.J ,,, 17-0 r-1
, - , 1
0 — ,-•,- - , g et)
p-ta g m
v, ,,- _. ,...., ..,. ... 0 ':' - ' .,-- :.1 :---, 1 ••,-
(....- 0 rD ..- .-- ,.., ,..„, 1 , _, ;... • I. ---,
c.,
..... -,-. ,--- --• ft, et , rT = , '..',
ti .-' < ' ' ,....-, Cl• C.:. - --2 ...:.? --)
..., 2 _ ,_ ,..._--; I ,■.,,,___
__,,,, ..-• 0 ::::, ,...-.:: c„:: -1 _ --, 0 "I 1
,-- —
7) 0
. ro ,-,,, ; ....,; , , , , ,..... :7r — I
0 v..) u, ' (.*"")
-. 0 . (,..., --. (\ \ , ,, , rt, ;>`: .,-. - . , : - ..1 - _ .. _... -.. 0 .• . ,
.---,
0 .. ra, ,..-., ..„ 1 = , f) .. ':-; \ ..7.., `:::: '-- .--- -) ..'-',!.., .'
1-
(-- .1 , r 4. . , t , g :t. '•' c: ;,-; -,..... • < C... cA
0 ;12 rD
. - — . i v ,,,,,- .1...'
(\--\ 0 ci, _ _...
p ., ci, ;..•_." -. - — ‘. :",- '''' '''' -, 7-, 2 C-.' 0
P. '- 0 - • - r; 1 -- •
c a. ,-,- •-, = 0 ' - — -- r •---' —
,-,--
C!..• .- <-4- ^) ' , ,--: (,-; ',...7, --• .-4
t" , P"7,!,,
ft) .- •
u ., ,--,- 0- E-2 •-•
:3 0... r.,,, *. FL :.-'
,
o ::1 ._, .--, r, — ') ;,' ;-'.7 — 7:), , 1--, e ,
tw o sa, ct„, . ...7' :".:', ' '.. ,- a. ,-, '7 r-.72 - -- 0 , .,..)..... .
cr o < f_,
.,
1 ,s_ pea, ,t) >. F,' ,-, ,..„ ......., -,
r) .,...; t ' 0 i
7-6
co /, , 0 rD , - i - '73 F2 (:),.., .2.....: . :,. E . ,,,,„, .,....,
ii....1
° 1 .
'.
: t " q ' r• \;-..'
----,
g) (--, eD c•r)
,...../. ..e. 1, e -** C; _, :
r-• • ,
.....4 _4- ,
,
!
. .•-••■. a ,- .1 :-... • ::,. , ...., •■ _, r". a. ,....-4 i \ -......., ......., ......'
- 2...... ,
..,....•
> '-' I F C. tr) ci. C :La , ...- -) :, ,•,. , '11
B c2.. .. ,
,-,- ...... r-1... , ...., , H i .
10 : <1 ...-. ::_,. (-4. ,...... ,..,..,
.4.. 0 ....1
.....
ti
(4 ::::„
.7,
, , -..: ,:-.,. r -, •,_ ,
c . , ' : , . • 4 - , , _ ".:
..:•,.
;.'„ : : ' ___ '„ ,,,•-+ 7\... ,
r•- „,, CO ,..,_ ..•-••••• fr C:i .... Cr 0 :.7,' !;... r ,, - • ..,-, :-..- ....7 L.—
,..... , ,--, ri ... ,....„. .,,, :-_-,- rD ., .
CD. C"-'1 Z. k.-) cy• .• B • -- ,"'-' ;,--"- — ::: ' rD 0., ,,
cD ,....., • i•- , ';:• - A :`(' 7' t-'''
■••••4
, '1,.. '
--
mt ,, . ' `0 ...t -< n er
_.
- w n
,7.•,• '\, -)
1: - - . ...- •
V.: • vi r-.- ,,-.--•- •--* 17" r. z.., — -•D . •;;;; .-) c-
- • .l.
...
w ci)
v.,
0 ., .,..
n
,--t- .---
0-3 ,
‘ '
:7. 0 ' o cf.
r..) ..
.... , r- -,..,•
\:- '-- ,.., ;....., ,-.4.,
!2.:7....-, ,....:•:?,..:,::). ...: ;.,
‘.‹ ..... - , 0 '....; ,
o...., • :., /*.- ,..-', , . , 7 4 ,....■ •--' .,.._.
W
.
,.., — • ,
....,
Cr, ,) c..0 ra. _... —
p I — :7 ::.,- .,-:-,,
rD : C ...-• , ",, `< ' Z.
i--
,-.. ,..,1 .-, ,•D ,
,-, -,-, ,...... :5 ,
W = -
C..s..A (...,■„, , ' ---,---- - , i a.
_.....1
k:./ ,
CID ''• - . - ..
0 .
:1
.) Po
. ..-1 r, CD ,... •
Cl.) ..! • :i
C.) ,,,,- ,., -`-' `-(,) _, ',,..;■ ;-:, < ,-+, < _
,-• `1":"...$ - C., f -- ' -, rr.: A
:,---. .) ▪ -
,...n , ,-,
et 'T..1 • -, - - ,•-•,, :' t
--- '
-1- ".... P. :.r
••..
•./) a• P) - •-.) ,.., ::::. •::: • (-_,,,, ' c, -, , -
•-•' --1 -' ' ..., ,-, --"-• `.‹-• ...,
f•-• --..• ,i4_ ,,,. "^.-. ' I r Pr..1 ,... , 0 et) -I rt •
E.:-, '-......, v. :7-, -. :-..: ,---
V. I e•-, ("- -..,„ ,-. r...
P.... ........'' ,.. • ,----'),
:!:', rp ..-■ `-- ,.. ,,,,,
- CD ,..- - •
...... ,...., e w
'``.,,,' • .-t c.-
c- - i•-•• 7, '"'" ,,,, ,-- • ,
>
,.. ,„, , - - t - '0 , • - - , ,
, -1 ..... CD •••*---
t , 1 , \ \ ,,....A. •-•) m '';'''' 0... i•--- , ....., ,,, ,....
CL I — ' 'D
___
e-t- .., '''''''" ,-, ,,,.. * e ''D ▪ 0 r - , -
Z ' ' ■ ..<
ro • '';`," ■••• ''-- ,-., 4-. A- - -
(E cc ,-4, ...., ,.. •----, --
,
v.: r:,-
\ 0 rad ,-- rD
r....: c k - rD
(.:,,,3 \ - ,
N , N.:',
,-, 0- cr.., a, 0, 7 F. c., < < C., 0, > (1 <
1) ., ...,
C C i' . -,..;' , 2 )- 0- , • — ' - =. .6 s In --; i:-' - o - ',
:::
,_"---:: -7. (L.: .-_-, - .., , --, , , ,- ," - • ,--. , • r ..,
', ,"-- • . - • _ -..... L ., n''). ' • ' - , ,. M '
F
a ..-. CI ' , , --...,
1 .., ..,.. « .
5* () t•-. '• ,' 1' :1 - c- < ' i , - • ,
..4 0
---,• :_ -,,, ••-:, : ...: -' ' .1 ' c
0, , , - ■ (.... - -- - ,,,, --, - , -;., t -.
•
n ' ' , -, - _-.., ' ,‘ -I' ' ,, , - ,-, ., n . • - !.. - - t,.... 9
I < c ,. 2 '. .--, .. , , , -'. '. - - , b '...; .• („, _ '• ' '11 *
t'.: Z ' - - ., __ ' - , . • ...,, • , cl r
..,
- , ,,-.„ ,..., ' c - --,' .-., --., •-' - '-. - :..) ,.- , )
'-, , ' .; c. , --, :-.
,.., , %..: 4. , - -
:---- -, --.... =. ::- .-. ;.•- ' , --; -,- : - ' 1 --,, .
-,.:, _ • ?--, ,, • ':*- E.-, , '..: - -.--: - - ' Y.', &:, - ' - - . , ., s: `1.: i '..,.
:',,, i (., I . " ' - - , -; , c. ''.,,' !-: - , - - , _: ,..- . •• f .3
* H ' L) r.:, 0 - '.,. l i ;-- , : - - . ' ' '7., .:- •I' c, - ,-- , V - A"
... , . - 0 ....,.,' - 11 - , 4- - 1: --, F; ■.5 ; s i • ‘_. , - _. `.+ c_ A , ,.. , , - ' , ' i ' 7;
C, ,-, c ;-,--- ..c. , = ', - --' -• , '''' -, , _ , , -.., +„. ,
--4 ',7 ci to ' -- -: ,-). • ' ,--• -, ', -' - - , .-, - --• ' 17.1'
Z - • , ;•• ( : ) ?,... .‘-,' i C :3 - 3 4 ,7 1 -. - - : 0 '- $:', , :- '..-1 !-= -')
4 .C :::: --1 Ti r --;,, `-± n '' • - .--.% - ' '" '
,-----.
.,
,-------
--
. .,
• ,-
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE .,
And/Or
. . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT c'
Ordinance No. 8 (Series of 1973)
k
t;
Application Date June. 6, 1977 Publication Date
- _.... .,
Hearing Date Fee
____
t :
. Final Decision date for Town Council
1,
i'
I (we) Vail Valley Medical Center of 181 W. Meadow Drive
(Applicant) (Address) ,
Colorado , c.4
, Phone
(State) (City)
—
—
do hereby request permission to appear before the Vail Planning 4
Commission to request the following:
5 ( X) Variance from Article Sectio• zq
-
, ...
( ) Zoning Change from to
5 ( X) Parking Variance
5 ( X) Conditional Use Permit to allow Hospital Construction
t.:
in Zone. i-
et.
v,
For the following described property: Lot/tract LotE-F, Block
— ;
k.
Filing Number ,
Clearly state purpose and intent of this application _ ..._ .
5 Respectfully request a variance for building bulk code.
5-510 To replace one existing parking lot to another location.
5-300 To vacate the lot line between Lots E L F and change
,
zoning from residential to health care facility con-
______ ,
f
ditional use. 1
i
. ,
What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this case?
/ c
5-50o The effective designing of health care facilities to
best utilize staff and care for patients precludes a
design that would require more hallways and odd shaped
and sized rooms. Therefore, we respectfully request a
bulk variance for the 8700 sq ft wing as submitted. f
(continued on Page 2) i
--- _ i
_
\ .:
,_,_.------ I , ..,------‘-----(--.‘----- E
- Signature of Applicant
. - 1
• 1
Page 2
5-510 Presently the main parking lot for Vail Valley Medical
Center is located to the south of the Center and contains
20 spaces. This parking lot has not been the most
desirable for the residential housing on the south
side of West Meadow Drive. It is our intent to correct
the flow problem brough about by growth and relocate
the main entrance of the Medical Center to the west and
also that parking lot. The old parking lot will be
completely removed. The remodeling of the Medical
Center will allow more complete care to those we presently
serve. The addition of the new wing to the north is
for more effectively handling emergency patients and
visitors which are services presently provided.
Since no inpatient beds are being added at this time,
we feel it is sufficient to relocate the existing
parking spaces and a covered parking is not needed
at this stage of development of the Medical Center
and respectfully request a variance from 5-501.
5-300 Entire Lots E & F will be used for the orderly
expansion and growth of the Vail Valley Medical Center
as the area we serve dictates.
. 7
.-------. . i
*".------r-''' 1,---- - --'.-----),.
4..._____, f 1
1 1/1/1/ r 2, -* 111° **-1cr:1 ) tr"? r ,,, , L , , , ' 7 , *
EM
. ,
,..„,-------------------..-......----------......-......................------ -
i
i
TO: Planning Commission
FROM Department of Community Development
DATE June 30, 1977
RE: Vail Valley Medical Center
Request for Three Building Bulk Control Variances
A Parking Variance, a Conditional Use Permit
and a Vacation of of the property line
between Lots E and F, Vail Village 2nd Filing
for construction of an additional 8,700 sq. ft.
to the existing VVMC
(A) BUILDING BULK CONTROL VARIANCES (SECTION 18.18.100)
The Vail Valley Medical Center is requesting three building
bulk control variances: maximum wall length, building diaganol,
and building offsets.
PERMITTED PROPOSED
Wall Length 125' 128'
Diaganol 160' 300'
Offset 175' over 50' 128' w/no offset
CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS FOR THE VARIANCES (SECTION 18.62.060)
The proposed addition is in an MDMF zone with the Professional
Building on one side and the Hilton Inn on the other. Due to the
high intensity use of these buildings and the already high intensity use
of the medical center, the proposed addition should create no additional
adverse impacts on this area.
The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpre
tation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary
to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among
sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this or-
dinance without grant of special privilege
The Vail Valley Medical Center is a unique entity in Vail,
The reason for the bulk control variance request is to permit
more efficient utilization of space within the hospital complex.
We, therefore, do not feel that these requests would be grants of
special privilege
1
The effect of the requested variances on light and air, distri-
bution of population, transportation, and traffic facilities,
public facilities, and utilities and public safety.
We see no adverse impacts on the above factors. The proposed
addition should not have any negative impacts on surrounding
property owners or uses.
FINDINGS:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant
of special prt5vilege inconsistent with the limitations on
other properties classified in the same district
See T-tems_l and_2 under Consideration of Factors.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety. or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
See Item 3 under Consideration of Factors,
- _-
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons
b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the site of the variance that
do not apply generally to other properties in the same
jzone.
See Item 2 under Consideration of Factors
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
of the requested variances to allow for the most efficient operation
of the new addition to the Vail Valley Medical Center.
-
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-(SECTION 18,18 030(b)
In an MDMF zone, one of the accepted conditional uses is
for "Hospitals Medical and Dental Clinics and Medical Centers".
The proposed addition to the existing medical center fits within
this category.
Upon review of Section 18.60,060 "Criteria and Findings", the
Department of Community Development recommends approval of the
Conditional Use Permit based upon the following factors:
Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives
of the Town,
One of the primary goals of the Town is to provide the best
health services possible to both the visitors and permanent poputation,
The proposed expansion of the medical center would work towards .
this objective,
The effect of the use on light and air, distribution (,
population, transportation facilities, utilities, sc,11(
parks and recreation facilities and other public faci
and public facilities needs,
The proposed addition should have no adverse effects (
items listed above.
Effect upon traffic with particular reference to cong=
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, tra .
flow and control, access, maneuverability, and remov ,ow
from the street and parking areas.
Along with the proposed addition is a relocation of ti
entrance of the hospital to the west of the existing build'
The parking lot on the south side of the existing buildin
West Meadow Drive) will be removed. This will further sep _he
cars using the medical facility from nearby residences
also allow for better circulation in and around the Medical
Effect upon the character of the area in which the Dr(
use is to be located.in relation to surrounding use,
The two building located adjacent to the Medical Cent
the Professional Building and the Hilton Inn. On the soufr
of the Medical Center are a few scattered residences The
addition to the existing Medical Center should have no sign lt
effect on these uses.
Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deem:
applicable to the proposed use.
No other factors should be considered.
No environmental impact report is required,
The Department of Community Development recommends th
Conditional Use Permit be approved based on the following s.
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accorC,
the purposes of this ordinance and the purposes of
district In which the site is located.
2, That the proposed location of the use and the cond
under which it would be operated or maintained wil
be detrimental to the public health , safety , or wc.
or materially injurious to properties or improveme!
in the vicinity,
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of IA)
applicable provisions of this ordinance.
PARKING VARIANCE (SECTION 18.18,140)
In a MDMF zone, 50% of the required parking spaces must be
covered, The Vail Valley Medical Center proposed 138 parking
spaces in its new plan, with none of them covered. The actural
number of parking spaces required by the zoning ordinance is not
specified for this project. The nroposed number of spaces does
conform with national standard for this type of facility.
CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS (SECTION 18.62,060)
The relationship of the requested variance to other
existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The new parking lot is a relocationof an existing parking lot
and therefore should create no new adverse impacts on surrounding
structures or uses, The removal of the parking space along West
Meadow Drive should have a positive impact on residences in that
area.
The degree of which relief from the strict or literal
interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation
is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the
objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege.
Since an existing uncovered parking lot is being moved
to another location, we do not feel that it should be
necessary to cover 50% of the new lot. The new parking
arrangement will also provide better access to the site.
The effect of the requested variance on light and air,
distribution of population, transportation and triffic
facilities, public facilities and utilities, and
public safety.
We see no adverse impact on the above factors.
FINDINGS:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
on other properties classified in the same district.
See Item 2 under Consideration of Factors
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
See Item 1 under Consideration of Factors
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following
reasons:
(a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement
of the specified regulation would result in practical
difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of this ordinance.
Since the parking lot is being relocated': it would be a hardship
to require the applicant to cover the new lot whereas the previous
lot was not covered,
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
of the parking variance.
VACATION OF LOT LINE BETWEEN LOTS E & F VAIL VILLAGE 2nd FILING
The Vail Valley Medical Center presently owns Lot E and has
an agreement to purchase Lot F, The request would allow for the
treatment of Lots E & F as one site, oncethe land has been purchased.
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
of this request to permit development of the expanded medical center
on both lots.
��� I an 1/ - c Phi4 '
/9/77
/00-67 itio-M-,- i'll.e.ie„.., , 1 6/4-0.....e.A.,./
ft-7,c , 7,-,, ___
1,
, .c, ,-., aye
k 1 J 0-d 47, -_,,.. /A •---- _,,j..z.8 / (..-iie-c‘.1 61.044)
f ___— , J .1 ._ ' i, s .3--a --- /fig ,.., V./....,..71-
7
'''..".._________________ --- /r1w--,1f goo//1•
-yJ __
n _ - / // 44.44 et[f.(-LL-u._.,.4-7-a`'
; ..,..,.. V 12. 4...4._-, zeal i 3 8 ......,z- -,-, c, e,.e
.elit-f,j a-elei. . _*_i._' 7 6 0 _ill/•
ildL*‘..e cl.....titu.,34- - 14 ,D it4 4 I-0-a.,,,,,,,,,„:t-iz. t 6-4-• -eCt- ... ,- A-E. �,2,.�_ �--0 --_.�._ — ...744.4.-1.,..6._
/
' j,L..,.e/. e c..�.`2L--m e , L et...li,Q -0`, �e ll„ t i ( i; / 9f
.-1]4-4,c,./f- ca ...,L - Lam, -/c...rr A.. ;_... G.it.`.j ty 0 •c1 . J 1Le..ce-
teet-41-4-4____ 2, ,,, ---- z.,--/,--Az-ez-tf--e-;s_,---to 79-&-- 01-0.----- --,....,
Vc.c_d_. _. ^. .,,4-or--c-4..-e',-71-- de,----&c__,— 64,---- 4-7--,24.44-1-4--r.e...44÷44-4---t)
•
. ,t,
,TVWWWW-MWWWWWWir
d42.-1..44.7 444 ot. t L./
L.tc- r eoe
it La
e•_
_
6. ir*.t
44 / Y, /4/o. 01`1.10.94.-.4.414.°77.-- a -4441.e.,-,-
JA- ei
_ _