HomeMy WebLinkAboutGLEN LYON LOT 11 LEGALa /rt/( ,6u4y,nfua.
,r*m
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Crmmunity Development
75 South Frcntage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail,co,us
Project Name: NASR NEW RESIDENCE DRB Number: DRB040502
Project Description:
NEW RESIDENCE
Participants:
OWNER NAS& MOE 09/122004 Phone:
7910 SAM HOUSTON PK\AIY W
HOUSTON 'tx 7706/.
License:
APPUCANT DAVID ALY O9lr7l2004 Phone: 281-807-5720
7904 N SAM HOUSTON PARI(\AIAY
sTE 102
HOUSTON
TX 7706/.
License:
Project Address: 1459 GREENHILL CT VAIL l-ocauon: 1469 GRENHITI CT
Legal Description: Lot: 11 Blodc Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB.
Parcel Number: 210312403021
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Action: WTTHDRWN
CondiUons:
Cond: 200
A concepfual revievrr is NOT a Design Review Board approval.
Planner: Elisabeth Eckel
I
,*fi)Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 lax: 97O.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General lnformation:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
reler to the submittal requirements ror the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
projecl may also need to be revi€wed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a-building permit is lssued and construction commences wlthln
one year of the approval.
Description ol the Request:
Location ot the Proposal: Lot: I I Block: Subdivision:
Physical Address:tqL? 6acc.^(;t( C
Parcef No.: Zt,O> fat{O 36U (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Name(s) of Owner(s):
ling
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
ailiiq Add
RECEIVED
Type of Review and Fee:
. Signs
. Conceptual Review
. New Construction . Addition
. Minor Alt€ration
(multi-f amily/commercial)
. Mhor Alteration
(single-lamily/duplex)
. Changes to Approv€d Plans
. Separation Reguest
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot ol total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construclion of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is add€d to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior @nversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, tenc€s and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Statf or the
Design Review Board.
No Fee
Check No.:Fee Paid:
Meeting Date:
Planner:
DFIB No.:
Project No.:
/
MIT\IOFllAII
D epartme n t of C ommun ity D ev elopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213I
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
October6,2004
Mr. David Aly
M. Nasr & Partners
7904 N. Sam Houston Parkway West, Suite 102
Houston, fX 77064
Re: NewPrimary/SecondaryResidence,DR8040502
'1469 Greenhill Court
Lot 11, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Aly,
Thank you for submitting an application for conceptual design review of a new primary/secondary residence al the
above address. Per our conversation earlier this week. I have outlined below the items that need to be submitted
before review of the application can proceed.
1) A topographic survey must be submitted that has been stamped by a Colorado-licensed surveyor.
The survey that has already been submitted does not rellect the stamp of a surveyor. Please make sure
that the survey for this lot includes the lot size and buildable area and indicates any easements and
environmental hazards (in this case, both moderate and high hazard debris flows) which exist on the lot.
Also, please note that once a stamped survey has been submitted, I will be recalculating the slope of the
lot to make sure that the average slope under the building will not be over 30%. lf the average slope is
too high, the site coverage allowance decreases, trom 201" of total lot area to 157o ol total lot area. A
significant slope would also affect other aspects of the development, which we can review once the
slope has been accurately determined.
2) Please submit an amended site plan which reflects the following:
e/Qsni4t
a. dffi grades underneath proposed ridge elevations. The roof plan that was submitted
approprialely conveyed roof pitch but neglected to state exact ridge elevations, which will be
needed lor precise building height calculations:
b. Spot elevations at the property line and garage slab and along the center of the driveway in
order to reflect grade. Also, please note that the first 10' of the driveway must be installed at a
grade no steeper than 8% and indicated as such on the site plan.
c. Proposed surface drainage on the site;
d. Location of limits of disturbance fencing;
e. The top and bottom ol wall elevations, in several locations, for each retaining wall;
f,-p ^u"'"'"o *n""^
fr',:t >*
l. A parking plan that reflects al least 7 full-size spaces tor the tlvo units. The primary unit will
require 4 splbes and the secondary unit will require 3 spaces. Currently, several ol the spaces
indicated are smaller than the 9' x 19' required by Code;
g. A four foot (4') wide unheated concrele pan at the edge ol asphalt. Please be sure that the
concrere pan l'ies in a separate heat zone if the driveway is to be heated. Additionally' please
indicate whether or not the driveway will be heated and the appropriate snow storage that is
required (30% ol the paved area if unheated and 10% of the paved area if heated);
h. Indication that all disturbed grades are returned to a 2:l ratio. According to the site plan
submitted, this is particularly problematic on the south and west sides of the lot.
B) Please submit a landscape plan that shows the trees to be removed. Though the lot is heavily
.
wooded, eventually the irees wiiich are proposed for removal (at least on the northern end of the sile) will
need to be staked ior reference. Additionally, please indicate the type and size of all the proposed plant
nafal proposed lor the site.
,{ On the roof plan, please provide the dimensions of all roof eaves and overhangs.
5) please submit a lighting plan showing the type, location, height, lumens output, luminous area, and
number of proposed exterior lighting fixtures. ,
6) Please submit a Title Report, including Schedules A and B, to verify ownership and easements.
7) Also, please note that a Hazard Report will need to be submitted to verify that no structural . .
amendmbnts need lo be made to adapt to the medium and high hazard debris flow that atlect this lot in
certain areas.
As I explained in our phone conversation, Leonard Sandoval, ol the Public Works Department, mel with me last
week to discuss some ol the issues which need to be addressed, most of which I have listed above. lf you have
particular queslions about some oJ the above issues, I may suggest.you contact Leonard directly. Again' his
irnone nrnib"r is 970.479.2198. However, lam certain that we will be cortesponding regularly, as dilferent.issues
arise. In the meantime, lwould suggest that we plan on a conceptual review with the Design Review Board for
the first meeting in November, wnich is the 3'd' before which time I would also request that a sample board be
submitted.
please do not hesitate to conlact me regarding any questions or concerns you might have. Again, thank you lor
to proceeding with the design review process with throughout the fall.
970.479.2454
cc: Leonard Sandoval, Public Works Department
submitting your application.
fu,/vhr/,/* n /pVta "T / / r/ "' L/u
From: "David Aly'<mnasr-david@buddy3.com>To: "Elisabeth Eckel" <EEckel@vailgov.com>
Date: 1012812004 10:14:13 AM
Elisabeth,
We are done with the comments that you sent us the other day. The only
problem is that we haven't been able to get a sealed copy from the
surveyors. They never answer the phone. We have left hundreds of
messages but they have not answered us yet. I think we are not going to
be able to make it for November 3rd. lf we do not receive any
communication from these people in the next couple of days, we are going
to have to do a new one with a different company. I hope this is not
going to be a mayor inconvenience for you, but I think is going to be
better if we re-schedule the meeting either for the 20th or the 1st of
December.
Thank You,
David Aly
M. Nasr & Partners P.C.
7904 N. Sam Houston Parkway W Ste. 102
Houston. Texas 77064
Tel: (281) 807-5720 Fax:.281 807-5716
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Hello David:
Elisabeth Eckel
mnasr-david@buddy3,com
1111812004 9:12:11AM
1469 Greenhill Court
I just wanted to touch base and see if you were still planning on the December 1st Design Review Board
meeting. lf so, I will need to have the plans in my office for review by Tuesday or Wednesday (the 23rd or
24th) of next week. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. For your reference, plans are
generally required 10 days in advance of a meeting. Therefore, if we were to schedule for the December
1Sth meeting, I would need plans by the first Monday in December.
As always, please don't hesitate to contact me with any lingering questions or concerns.
Warm regards,
Elisabeth Eckel
Planner, Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
970.479.2454 ofc
970.390.3554 cell
970.479.2452tax
t
November 23,2004
Mr. David Aly
M. Nasr & Partners
7904 N. Sam Houston Parkway W., Sle. 102
Houslon, fX 77064
Re: NewPrimary/SecondaryResidence,DRB040502
1469 Greenhill Court
Lot 1 1, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Aly,
Thank you for submitting an application lor conceptual design review of a new primary/secondary residence at the
above iddress. I have icheduled the item for the last Desiln Beview Board meeting ihis year, december 1 5th,
2004. Without further direction from you, this is the last time I will be able to reschedule the application that was
submitted on September 17,2004. In the event that we do not communicate before then about how you would
like to proceed with the application, I will be forced to withdraw the application entirely.
Please do not hesitate to contact me regarding any questions or concerns you might have. Again, thank you for
submitting your applicalion. I look forward to proceeding with lhe application upon your direction.
%*,
Best regards,
t r u'
Elisabeth Eckel
970.479.2454
From:
To:
Date:
Elisabeth,
"David Aly" <mnasr{avid@buddy3.com>
"Elisabeth Eckel" <EEckel@vailgov.com>
1210112004 4:12:39 PM
First of all I want to apologize for the lack of communication from my
part about the whereabouts of this project.
The most important problem we have had with this project is the
discrepancies in the slope percentages that leave us with no solid
ground to finish designing it.
I received a sealed drawing ftom the surveyo/s office at Frisco, but it
is not addressing all of the issues that you were requesting on the
first letter. lt does not have the lot size, buildable area, easements,
or any environmental hazards that you specified we had on this lot. I
found a Hazard evaluation (signed for a Colorado P.E.) from a Natural
Hazard Consultant firm did for us a few years ago and I am attaching it
to the survey so you can evaluate it.
I was wondering if I send you these two items you could go ahead and
re-calculate the slope. This would give us a firm base to continue the
design development and in the meantime the surveyor could finish with
his plan to be ready for the next submittal.
lf you are forced to withdraw the application for this yea/s meeting
with the design review board, it is understandable. ljust hope this
will not have any kind of negative connotiations in the normal
development of the approval process, I do not really think we would be
ready for the 15th of this month (entirely depending on the results of
the slope calculations). Just let me know if you withdraw it what my
next step should be to try to get it reviewed again.
Best regards,
David Aly
M. Nasr & Partners P.C.
7904 N. Sam Houston Parkway W. Ste. 102
Houston. Texas 77064
Tel: (281) 807-5720 Fax:281 807-5716
December 20,2004
Mr. David Aly
M. Nasr & Parlners
7904 N. Sam Houston Parkway W., Ste. 102
Houston, TX 77064
Re: NewPrimary/SecondaryResidence,DR8040502
1469 Greenhill Court
Lot 1 1, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Aly,
*rr*
Thank you for responding to my concerns regarding the slope calculation of lhe lot at the above address. Per
your request, I have conducted a preliminary slope analysis ot Lot 11, Glen Lyon Subdivision. After overlaying
the topographic survey onto the site plan, I concluded that the average slopes (as defined below) undemeath the
proposed built improvements are about 42/".
SLOPE: The gradient or configuration ot the undisturbed land surface prior to site improvement ol
a lot, site, or parcel which shall be established by measuring the maximum number of feet in
elevation gained or lost over each ten feet (10) or fraction thereof measured horizontally in any
direction between opposing lot lines; the relationship of elevation or vertical measure as divided
by the hoizontal measurement shall be expressed as a percentile as a means of quantifying the
term "slope". ln determination of "slope" as defined herein, for use in establishing buildable area
rcquirements and maximum lloor area ratio limitations on existing and proposed lots, a grid
system based on ten foot (10') modules shall be superimposed on a topognphic map ol the
subject property and the lot slope determination established by the defined method for each one
hundred (100) squarc feet grid portion ot the tract, lot or portion thereof. (Section 12-2-2, Vail
Town Code)
Therefore, please note that according to Section 12-21 -14, Vail Town Code, the following restrictions will apply to
Lot 11.
RESTRICTIONS IN SPECIFIC ZONES ON EXCESSIVE S[OPES.'
The following additional special restrictions or requirements shall apply to development on any lot
in a hillside residential, single-family residential, twoJamily residential or twolamily
primary/secondary residential zone district where the average slope of the site beneath the
existing or proposed structure and parking area is in excess of thirty percent (30%):
A. A soil and foundation investigation, prepared by and beaing the seal of a registered professional
engineer shall be required.
B. Foundations must be designated and bear the seal of a registered professional engineer.
C. A topographic survey prepared by a registered surveyor, with contou interuals ol not more than
two feet (2'), shall be required.
D. Sttuctures must be designed by a licensed architect.
E. Site coverage as it pertains to this chapter, as permitted by sections l!fup, 1 2-68-9, 12-6C-g
and 12-6D-9 of this title, is amended as follows:
1. Not more than fifteen percent (15%) of the site area may be covered by buildings, except in
conjunction with a type I employee housing unit in accordance with chapter 13 of this title, in
which case not morc than twenty percent (20%) of the site area may be covered by buildings; and
2. Not more than ten percent (10%) of the total site area may be covered by driveways and
surface parking.
F. A site grading and drainage plan shall be required.
G. A detailed plan of retaining walls or cuts and fills in excess of five teet (5') shall be required.
H. A detailed revegetation plan must be submitted.
l. The administrator may require an environmental impact repoft as provided in section 12-12-2 of this
title.
J. A minimum of one covered parking space shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
K. Setbacks, as they apply to this chapter, as required by sections 12-6A-6, 1 2-68-6, 12-6C-6 and 12-
6D-6 ot this title, arc amended as follows: there shall be no required front setback for garages,
except as may be required by the design review board. Garages located in the front setback, as
provided lor in this section, shall be limited to one story in height (not to exceed 10 feet) with the
addition of a pitched or flat roof and subject to review and approval by the design review board.
L. Retaining walts up to six feet (6') in height may be permitted in the setback by the design review
board when associated with a permitted garage as referenced in subsection K of this section.
In spite of the Jact that I have preliminarily calculated the average slope under the proposed built improvement, it
will be necessary to submit a topographic survey from a registered Colorado surveyor nonetheless. Please do
not hesitate lo contacl me regarding any questions or concerns you might have, including lhe allect of excessive
slopes on development potential. I look forward to proceeding with the application upon your direction.
970.479.2454
LOlL2/2484 L4.24
t'ra
978641 ART MEARS
l||:|:{il_I lg!!l$l I l- ekr irwln lorit. Ciffi,
l''| hflll I H {l h tr c|lffi ttar t|E6
911qI t1 qg41. d Frnt,-rr*o errcrrr 6,c&-or;b,,frf hJii,ir ilfr'calnrnro r?ilrfhJrchrd(t||t
JZJE'
o
PAGE AI
AftlrruRl. ilIEA$l. Pf,", rNc.Nerlllur&Cdr lttFEta ffnGffitrtS flhtfo{.t{aa
*,thil.m r=rld.-
Ir. h1{r LltrFrsrr trtol{. t|rHilfrrFtrrw llrfrltxrrca Frt t||.ff"$l|
RE: lffi tlftrr ef Lol lf, o|lr ttoi et ., YaI
h*.Lr
Tlr F'Dr.5 rH]il d l|# d.r4 fi n ofildlht (,r krh ?r. Thr osdryil c rtlr rtdr n b nmm_ilpgfF_o ddi hffi.llffii. h,lr?frEd .l ?, uom Fnr ilrrrt b raililElEnq i ,nai. nr lrrr c.nrjlty'nirn nr rdE fl r rffi r tHr * {-,rf yurE |t| rr ttEI| rro ril tlfrilr b nl rm,r urr ffinc'. camr Grfy) ;i6 n c;'''r cfu . ;,il ;;il'o uf, r*r ffiilrrlrtrrnrrdlr. -__
--fu ffiF'-q$!ttcr-:F rl-gFtnn arr'F r h r*.l, ri H;IEF;?I*rqlqrall-riE,,hT;iilfi ffi lh"ffi ggllll9gE*=JPlnt'qli.F-ii'iiEicsT;i,ifi ;,,ukn su.t? E_?= I it!L!",!F nEffi Jf ifr :f,i nfi',i|i'fid'Tffi fr .mis nffi hr ffi Ed!r: _tl F|ilt f,ud;*a n n-doffi; h nr edr nfi of Otrfit Ooutt U-rroOr'tUr. L,Hr9;6-rorr nlr |rtbrd.
barmttt'r gtlggl $-.1111lq h, crar rr crrlc 6-;lihffi ememrr.lrt drtdton_mry crn r E qr-tn ilrrjr'ffiltU $rfrffi;d siiE rr rn Yhtbi d Tffi d YI ng!-qrfrrcr
Th| bulrfif I b noi tHn| srh met d rw |tdr*fn d |!ffi .
Fln Eflrttd mr l?yon hrw ql|it*f of ddt| flo,rJ ofiilJi||bn.
*rilft
Olft", {,v1luo'Arll|rlLflr,F.:.ArrId|{rftartrlr-r
Cc Fr AEilv5 h ItO4tFl0Cl
*rr firf r,|5rr.;6a*;,mffi
narT-4a -a'tla;/| t1A. a1tt-nlA It-r \n"rrrt Aa=^--
o
Lcgal dcscription: L
Ad drcss
Olncr
Arch itcc t
ZONE CHECK
Brrildablc
fua f /foo f,/V
7
,"o,ouof4ft'*Z31l Wl,T Proposcd Total Rcmaining ,/// /b
Prinrarv CRFA + ta):\ tt )z}1ry-
Sccondary CR_FA + Sl,$l:--F=--.- +
r 6'15 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition
ls rqucst involvc a 250.A,ddition?
.
Hcight
Sctbacks
)'t6'-- )VK
:^qi,"d lf 3
-
Encloscd ft<+/^z(
Caragc Crcdit
Drivcrvay
Conrplics wirb TOV Lighting Ordinancc
Arc finishcd gradcs lcss rhan 2l (SO%)
En r.ironm cn ta U!{azards
ls lhc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc:
(300) (600) (900) (1200)
2) Floodplain
Pcnnittcd Slopc ---% proposcd Slopc lzo
Ycs No--z
,/Ycs No__ll__
4) Watcr Coursc Soback (30) (50)_-_.---
5) Gcologic Hazards
:-lksz- [mr< dr.t */ffi)
Front ., 20,Sidcs .r5' ___:-- FiltFOrtttttNaf-Rcar li' -
-
,-rt rttD ^. r.',^ f t-
-
FNtPa*dffNk
L:ndseping
Rctaining Wall Hcigbts
Parljng
Minimum
b) RocHall , i
"1 o"a;,no,u v/ t-ljffi-TT2Tlf tlk7frr_>
trsv\v
Scalc
1'/r"s.r a.r"riprion
./. Z- Spot clcrations
Q srE PLA}.I
/
-ll s."t.
Jrrrr^r*"rro,
* Encroachmcnb.
r/ Sctbacks
-/ si,, co".".g,
-
EavcJOvcrhanF (4)
-/Dccls8alconics
-r./{*srro*oi^
- Lot Sizc
--_; Buiklablc Arca _
-
E:scmcnts
,a-_JZ. Topography
' !Ats&!l5c.ffi
__ _
En vironorcn bl Hazlrds
' / Tr"q
Utjlity locations Eristing tccs
Proposcd tsccs.-.--
Lcgord
MISCELTANEOUS
!9+t+fr*a
Titlc rcport (A & B)
-
Utility vcrifcation form
-.
Photos of.ilc
-
Building mataial samolcs
9.O. Vcrification
-
SunlShadc Ang:les -
Utilitics (undcrground)
-
ptrc*ictrions
Sitc Gradc\Slopc
-'
Rctaining lValls
Tuoing Radius
-
Drivcrvay (acccss and er3llc)
-.
Snow Storaqc
-
Firc Acccss
r---'
:
-
#rd{frr*Cffrtr-. -/-
-{ Crawl\Attic Spacc
-@ E BUII,DD.IGELEvATIoNs
'/... -5 sol"
I cororru"r"rc;la,-/'
--{ Roofpirch
Q LANDscApE pLA.\
o
January 21, 2005
Mr. David Aly
M. Nasr & Partners
7904 N. Sam Houston Parkway W., Ste. 102
Houston, TX 77ffi4
Re: NewPrimary/SecondaryResidence,DBB040502
1469 Greenhill Coud
Lot 1 1, Glen Lpn Subdivision
Vail, GO 81657
Dear Mr. Aly,
Due to the lack ol recent communiration, I have withdrawn the application which was submitted on September
17, 20(X for conceptual despn review of a new residence at Lot 11, Glen Lyon SuMivision. Please let me know
if and when you would like to resubmit an applicatbn and I will more than happy to help pu whh that prccess.
Best regards,
Elisabeth Eckel
970.479.2454
enclosure
ZONE CHECK
oute: fuv? l(P
Legal description: Lot
Address
Owner
Architcct
Proposed use
Lot sizc Buildable area
a4qr4b#
Remainine Allowed Existine Proposed Total
Secondary cRFA Jl /$- + gzs) @7f =-A {to-
(30x33)
Front
Sides
Rear
20,
l5'
l5'
Minimum
3'. 16',
Required Errclosed
Garage Credit
Driveway
Complies with TOV Lighting Ordinance
Are finished grades less than 2: I (50%)
Enviro nmcntalAlazards
(300) (600) (e00) (r200)
Permitted Slope
-%
Proposed Slope
-%
Yes_ No
Yes No
b) Rockfall
Previous conditions ofapproval (check property file[
rotal GRFA {ab+ * ,tb
primary cnpn 3i70 + @25\ 62yl=_3{91_
*5V{=$u$irplug}S}addittroy
Does this request involve a 250 Addition? t" /k
How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this reouest?
siteCoveragc af t (SV>\
Height
Setbacks
Landscaping
Reaining Wall Heighs
Parking
l) Percent Slope (< >30%)
2) Floodplain
3) Wetlands
4) Water Course Setback (30) (50)
5) Geologic Hazards
a) Snow Avalanche
Is the property non-conforming? Describe:
c) Debris Flow
DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Project:
E SURVEY
Scale
Benchmark
Legal description
Lot Size
Buildable Area
EasemenK
Topography
100 yr. flood plain
Water Course Setback
Environmental Hazards
Trees
Utility locations
Spot elevations
E SITE PLAN
EI FLOOR PLANS
Scale
GRFA
250 additional GRFA
Crawl\Attic Space
EHU
O BUILDING ELEVATIoNS
Scale
Color\Ir4aterials
Roof Pitch
Q LANDSCAPE PLAN
Existing trees
Proposed trees
Legend
MISCELLANEOUS
Scale
Building Height
Encroachments
Setbacks
Site Covenge
Eaves/Overhangs (4')
Deck/Balconies
Garage corulection
Site Grade\Slope
Retaining Walls
Fences
ParkingiGarage
Turning Radius
Driveway (access and grade)
Snow Storage
Fire Access
Condo Approval
Title report (A & B)
Utility verification fomr
Photos ofsite
Building material samples
C.O. Verification
Sun\Shade Angles
Utilities (underground)
View Conidors
Variances
Plat restrictions
c)o z
2 F c ()
{o z T m F
={
--I
-
d
@
m !€tr. i s
FE; F E 3
=!! 19 s i c!" ld F 3 7 liq I t=E
=LILIL-J r 5 r! 6 €
=|- 4 o->= 6 E oqt 6 I >= ii o :6 S E
il t
-
z,O
u+qn
u
?n
8i --{ ^9X
Qr z. r-1t-
3=
az 9c)v
8?
=F <l oat {o o>ior
o
9",-{m nz >m C)I]-.t >
u o I
=m o -{
=z
m n
-l o
z
n
'{F Fr H
3
F
H
P
H
f4
FE
tri
,9f,u;a C)>'t-
r
@ t-
ll r z
F
r
E lo
7
Fn |q Itt
IU lH t<
lH l(,IH
F
-t
m -m
-l to
l€
lz o .tl
t>
lF !m
F)z I
'n
\o s.
I
E
tt H r
E
l€
lz
'r'l
-
R
z
:-
F 5
I t
tr
r ct r-i
z
f!
tt
H
t r{rl
F
6 {z
o I
=
B
z o
n
=
-l
E z
.t1
I r
m
.1.t
=
l-{to l{
lz lo
ll t>-
lm
lc,,z
tl
=t-
u m v,
.r1
u
=
I i
H r
2
m =t-
m
5
\o
lr1
lr1 z
H r r-
I
.t -
E.
0z lo
'r.i -{m
tl ll
lEs IT It, {fo lr- 'Tl
9T !?m
={
-l o
@ m x m !-{
o z
<-o
TD L -{r'I
O
C:(,.,
F.!
F_r
E3d o9.d
6Rg
8iB l:-
=o o '<Qt {E6-
1*€
o =f,-'O qt a**
=.s
{:i or o
e 3-a reB.for odl
P+o
e- de E o)E qr -;'-r 4i;
a9.d o :. --OO+gis
=.9
3 :'o -.qro-=s.=
o-e l 3;e q:1 o.x o
fcj * ='d 3 oo'
vr 6'=
38E
(2o=.
D-(D
o ---
0)t o
o
o-
o
=o.
J
(t
q,
c
o
q)
='(o
o
{f
v;
rN
5
5 (o
A'
aa
lq
=:9.
o I
o
9.(cI
f
o
6'{
gt E
o
o
-o.c
=.
3
(D
E.
E
(o
o
5
=o
'tl
I
(n
m
'tl
z
+T
m
€z
m
m
e
7a
-).
!
x
z
2
€
<
)4
t-
g,
-.1 z o
?I c 'a
'..J.
a.>-o
O\J
o z
-
!
m !
-':z)
lz
lz
t=
l=
;o<>.'|1It lm
@ tm
> lo
€
'n
2.(
m
-t
€
t-r a
n t-o z a c -
+
z
-t
!m
I 6 x z
m
rt
t-c
m
I q
I -t
z
-l
z
9
I
ln
o fi
o €m t-I z
c z
-.1 (t
o :
z c z
--l
z m {
t-
-.1 m
P
^z
ts
9<
>(
=z
m
--t
m
I
.Tl t
z H
F x t{
H
F'
tr{
Onre
= x<'-ll .i !4-?n F io nln
=zo iz,qo o-z a q.2 je i?os=o zq oo o 'nzz.
5
x
F>-
N@=
r,rI-
5-<n<
=
I
I
z
g
X X
z z
F
F
2
z o
m a
=z
=z 6 -{
o
m
ol
2',ol
o:il ol tl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9l
HI
I
I
I
I
C-r
z
F
H
CN
Lr
ts z
u)
X
D.t F I'
\o
o -{
t-
!m
=-t 'n
m m
an
c g,
m
-.1
x
m
z
m
t
-l
m (n
z
m
m €
@ o
t
u m o u m
=z .rl
m m
=m
C)I
z o
-
|-
z
m
m o -{u
t-
z o I m o x
|-
=
m
=
m
=
='Tl
m m
UI
VALUATION
H
H
rr
=m
z
t-
t-
@ z
m l-m cl
6
f'
@
t-
=
T m T
=
=z 9
+
$s N
*
-{a o:E;|nts Ir.r^
=>;I-. hSE
l'!i o -=tm \-:
l^ - j-
=l; Ri-=l; Isg
l= m =o li E=j ' <t:
! -=
o.<I -J-{ ==o m{
-ll .--l ^=:3 >< -Y > -=: --.l ;i >:9=! (./,
tn !>3=
6DD
L]LJLI
3!cr
--C .;x
t, >
-
.?t -!OF
z=
>=
o"z
c)-o z
U)
-l c
c)
=o z
11 ,m
3
-t
oll I 9e t * I ;2 il 9t >rn [ =.l r)= ll -{ 4
ot-- il a {
-tt
m
m z
o
rl :r ll
=tl ;ll oll zll .'ll
o o z --t
c)
o
ll,-.
ll ei
il :c=Ie=
il :>
>;
(-
=lil
F
nr-;rm aO o>.|-
E
F p
I',lr r
I
,l(]
t-(t<
3
t€
l3
l'n t<t>|-
m
9)z
l-{
l€
t:
ln li t:
m
i
-]..l
=
/t\'v,'
-<,.-r t-<
t;'i
t^
IT
ls
i
la
li
I
{€
C z
z
(t
I
lo rl t=rl
I >,r I-rl
t^tl
t-il
mrl !tl >'l
=ll ^tl
-ll :
-l !l
il
t-
o
-=
an
<l
c)l
vtl
I
I :tl <l >t
.nl
I
o
2
|.:t
€
o
(,)
:-
!
-J
I -l
ol
I
I
tn
{z
{J)m
-l
x
o<n!.m
o I
=o z
-
m
i a,z m tn
,_ I t1
-i
.-
m
=-l .Tl
m m a I
I
o
I e
-l
i
I
I
o
P-O-.o<8;
is o;
:eE :9
z tn
o
c)
€
o
{o
x
trt-
,J(D :o
,:l o
3=.
CJ ,-
aJo
=;:5:
cro
o;i
o--
aru-'-or
-E
-CJ :-
:- 6'
t o-- I :o I ;'o I
.- |l='t
'I
I .= ll -T (DI I 1t 9I ll ,l 3l -t .3 1 s. l :l xt --l
-;
<o {3
=^r.
o=
=-
-CJi .r=
^.tni
io:
l:Jt
) _;
- -c -(D I
I-=rfo
oo
6r :< =
:r(D
oa
-o 6'=o:
.€--(,o
cr-
Q-o
-o
-;:-<
o. {.
,^=
'J cJ
ool .)ll
=;:f -l
:3J-,.f :r-;
r:.
:s6 'X ='{ I
=<io-oP
f:,
l.)
:l ir
6A'
cr.l fO q-.
(Dlr
s.€
\c,
tJ=
t
oO
oe oc..='
-O.
-=_O(,,
f'Jt
.., a) :
):::;
ro-
r=:
NE
:'{(c=
g<
io
o
s.
G {
!
o
o o'
c
.=o
=
s.
lOr oi O(o.:(Dr ..:
cL-
15(
(D;
o-ct:
tri
8^,(DO
glf
o:
{:J E'a 4a
f<:.4 t9
,r
)o
tf
ia
rol Jr
X x
> atl za a-i :>
mc
5o
P6
E zl ml !l
ol -l ol ol zl
>l
ol
ol
il
aJ,, I ,'tl FI 'rt I
,o=
t{:='96
z>oo
_:9 {?;o > 9'
s.r d z c
=U'
o
=
lllr
dl z'
it
ol rl
6l
>l
ol
I
I I'
Ol >l
,nI
I
z z o
F
@ c
l.
z
C)z o
m v,
c
cl rt
-
m
-
m m
UI
x
o
d
VALUAiION
I
vlFl
-rto >t:r-l>l=lo t>
@ m
m !{
o z c o
(D g {c\\-Y-
rP
I
F
l\
LI
STABILIZATION STSTMS / MATERIALS
April 25, 1984
City of Vail
Bullding and Constructlon Dept.
Vail, C0.81657
RE:1469 Greenhill Ct., Vail
Gentlemen:
On a recent trlp to Vall I noticed a large duplex at the above
address whlch I understand has never been fully completed due
to foundation problems. Our fi.rrn is engaged in the soil stabi-
llzation business and we work nationwide correcting many structural
oroblems due to soil and subsurface water movement.
Could you pl-ease be so kind as to advLse me
of the structure and the name and address of
so that I rnay discuss the problem with them
if our technology may be of benefLt.
of the current status
the owner or contractor
and try to determine
lof I I
J1"-t''Cl* (l
PJw/ch
WOODBINE CORPOR,ATION / 2510 DECATUR AVE., FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76106 / $17]] 624.1189 / DALLAS METRO 654.1022
A Subsidiary of Fortex Coeontion
J. lJright
Pres ldent