HomeMy WebLinkAboutGLEN LYON LOT 23 LEGALT
€*
b/,n ,lotts
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Oepartment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vai[, Colorado 81657
tel:970.479.2139 fax:970.,479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com {P\r[t-FJIf CE\,ELjf,F\iEl{T
Project Name: HOVEYTREES
Project Description:
Project Address:
1339 WESTHAVEN CR
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Commentss
DRB Number: DR8050481
FINAL APPROVAL FOR THE REMOVAL OF DEAD AND OVERCROWDED TREES
Particapants:
OWNER HOVEY, NANCY M.
l WOODHOLM LN
MANCHESTER
MA 01944-1057
APPUCANT HOVEY, NANCY M.
09/0912005
09/09/200s
l WOODHOLM LN
MANCHESTER
MA 01944-1057
1339 WESTHAVEN CR VAIL
Lot: 23 Blockl Subdivisionr GLEN LYON SUB.
2103-124-0300-9
see conditions
Location:
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
ActiON: STAFFAPR
Date of Approval: 10/11/2005
Cond: 8
(PIAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0007638
That only the 16 trees identified in the application and marked with blue ribbon on
the site are allowed to be removed pursuant to this application.
IOIflVffi
fttinor Exterior Alteratifs 'Otr Application for Design Review lnato
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
teli 97O.479.2L28 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior lo submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required informauon is received by the Community Development Depatment. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
u*x
Mad a,w tu't\'L\1!^d-e Cl the Request:Description
0AUr{,v\
Location of the Proposal: Lot: A3 glock:
Physical Address:
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing
Owner(s) Signature(s):
HHt,:ffii
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
Type of Review
tr Signs
tr Conceptual Review
E New Construction tr Addiuon
---s>D +
Phone:
Fax:
0.,'v\
o {,f
lK
cs
-\
r v.iFax:
ve {rres COvtn q 10-
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
n
l/Kl ,/-\
tr
tr
Minor Alteration
( multi-fam ily/com mercia l)
Minor Alteration
(sin gle-family/du plex)
Changes to Approved Plans
Separation Request
For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
For an addition $/here square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
For Office UgeQnly: ,4,
Fee Paid: Check No.: * By:
oate: /o- sat Meeting
Planner:
$6s0
$300
$2s0
/4rD l_---,'
$20
No Fee
\(,'i /
i ':t '.rttt;4|
t44
- !r.,. t.\
, a!;-.- .'. J ' '1\ k::,' -,..t;3 t -
;'.t ?*
t rl l-LtoW htvst--
)
GKeeuHu CTUKT
I t" +',<!A
t l,n. alj.-
+'
/, ,/ h
frH
tl
fl
n tl |'t
F
i-_l
l*J
U.,PIL
+tffr
--\..r-
I
,l-<a
fl'4h,y
il@
't'r<a
Hcu 5c * iss?
}RrV€WAV /
W
, I -r---xl /v wesTrtAvzu CtRC L€
o
Size
-ll
Vd"nab tc-PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
DCSTING TREES
TO BE REMOVED
*A
Requirements for Landscaping:
GROUND COVER
SOD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL
Please speciff other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, $^rimming pools, etc.)
t - lrnD I
Deciduous Trees - 2" Caliper
Coniferous Trees - 6' in height
Shrubs - 5 Gal.
Tvpe Square FootdpglwN OF VAIL
DESIGN REVIEW
STAFFAPPROVAL \
Page 7 of L3lO6lO6l05
UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICA
This form serues to verify that the proposed improvemenE will not impact any existing or proposed utility services,
and also to veriff service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with
preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations,
shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification.
o
TION
Comments
QWEST
970.468-0672(tax)
Contacts:
Sam Tooley 970.468.6860
Jason Sharp 970.384.0238
XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS
970.262.a076 (tel)
970-468-1401 (fax)
Contact: Richard Sisneros
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC
970-947-5435 (tel)
970-945-4081 (fax)
Contact: Mike Mikolic
XCEL ENERGY
970.468.1401 (fax)
Contacb:
Kit Bogart 97 0.262.4024
Jim O'neal 97 0.262.4003
EAGLE RIVER WATER &
SANTTATION DISTRICT
970.476.7480 (tel)
970.476.4089 (fax)
Contact: Fred Haslee
COMCAST CABLE
970.468-2669 x 112 (tel)
970.468-2672 (fax)
Contact: Bradley Dorcas
Authorized
Sionature
Date
NOTES:
1. If the utility approval & verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments are
made directly on the fornl the Town will presume that there are no problems and the development can proceed.
2. If a utility compariy'has concttns with the proposed construction, the utility representative shall note directly on
the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in
an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility
company and the applicant to resolve identified problems.
3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way Permit from the
Department of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utility locations must be obtained before dioqing in any public right-
of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not a Public Way permit and must be obtained
separatelv.
The Developer is required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval & re-verification if
the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date (unless otherwise specifically noted
within the comment area of this form),
Page 8 of L3lO6lO6l05
tftt*{'**+*++t***tl+t*****ttta****+t++**trt****+*li*'}i't+*******++**+*******l+t+*+*t*{r*********
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Srarernent ++f+f+l'i***++l++*a++++++t*'}*+++ltftfla++*ati'*+*+**l*t+****+*aaa**l******aala*a**************
Stsateneut Nutnber: R05000148? Amount: g20.00 09/09/2OOSO3:5B pM
Payment Method: Cash Inits: dts
Notation: $/!{A},rcY HovEY
PermiE No: DR8050481 T)4)e: DRB-Minor Alt, SER/DUP Parcel No: 2103 - 124-0300-9
Site Addrese: 1339 WESTHAVSN CR VAIIJ Locat,ion: 1339 WESTHAVEN CR
Total Fees: $20.00 Thie Payment,: $20.00 Total ALIJ EtntE: $20.00 Balance: $0.00 ****'}*+'i+**+*+*+*{'*t'i*+++*++*************++{'*i*****++****r+t*t****t***r*fr****'}*+f+f++tt****
ACCOT,JNTITEM LIST:
Account Code DeEcript.ion Current EtnEa
DR OO1OOOO3LL22OO DESIGtr{ REVIEW EEES 20.00
'r.-of {3
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD vArL, CO 81,657
970-479-21-38
DEPARTT4ENT OF
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
MECIIANICAL PERMIT
.lob Address. . . : l-339 WESTI{AVEN CR Location : 1339 ITIESTIIAVEN CR
Parcel No... ..; 2L03-124-03-009
Project Number:
APPLICANT CONCEPT MECIIANICAL, lNC
P.O. BOX r.L65, AVON, CO
CON'TRACTOR CONCEPT MEC]IANICAL, INC
P.O. BOX 1155, AVON, CO
i,lechanical.---> Loo.00 Restsuaran! Plan Revies- - >
DRB Fee -------
StaEus. .
AppIied.
Issued..
Explres.
8162 0
81620
Phone:
Phone:
OWNER HOVEY NANCY M
O WOODLOLM RD, MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA MA 01944
DescripLion: Valuation:
REPI,ACE BOILER WITH I,ARGER FOR ADDED SNOhMELT
Fir6ptace Infor ation; Rescticted: Y #of cas Appliances:*Of Ga6 Logs:
4, 500 . 00
*of Wood/Pallet:
FEts SUMMI\RY
Plan Check- - - >
Inveetigation>
will call---->
Totat calculaLed Feca- -->
Addicional Fees- - -- ----->
Total Permi t Fee---__--->
Paymenta---_-_-
.00
. oo
128.00
. oo
12A, OO
124 ,0(}
25 .00
.00
3.OO
TOTATT AEES------ 12S.00
."" .;;.';;;;;.;;;;;;;;;
;;*';;;;;;;;';;;;;:;:""'.O8/LO/L999 JRM ACIiON: APPR APPROVED ..]RM-
iib.mf '.05600 FrRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division:
o8/1-o/L999 'JRM Actj-on: APPR N/A
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
]-. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REOUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIAIiICE.2. COMBUSTTON ArR rS REQUTRED PER SEC. 701 OF THE 1997 UMC, OR
SEETION 701 OF THE 1997 IMC.3. INSTALI,ATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFAETT]RES TNSTRUETIONS AND
TO CHAPTER 10 OF THE 1997 IJMC, CI{APTER 10 OF THE 1997 IMC.4. GAS APPLIANCES SHALL BE VEI\TTED ACCORDING TO CIAPTER 8 AND
SHALL TERM]NATE AS SPECIFIED TN SEC.8O6 OF THE 1-997 I]MC, OR
CIIAPTER 8 OF THE 1997 IMC.5. ACCESS TO HEATING EOUIPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 3 AND
SEC.1O1"7 OF THE 1997 I]MC AND CHAPTER 3 OF THE ].997 IMC.5. BOII-,ERS SI{ALL BE MOT]NTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONST.
IJNLESS LISTED FOR MOI]NTING ON COMBUSTIBLE FLOORING.7. PERMIT,PI.,ANS AIiID CODE ANALYSIS MIUST BE POSTED IN MECHANICAI.,,
ROOM PRIOR TO AI$ INSPESIION REOUEST.8. DRAINAGE OF MECIIANICAL ROOMS CON:TAINING HEATING OR HOT_WATER
SUPPLY BOII-,ERS STALL BE EOUIPPED WITH A FLOOR DRAIN PER SEC.
LO22 OF THE 1997 UMC, OR SECTION 1004,6 OF THE 1997 IMC.
9. REOUIRE ]-58 SO INCHES HIGH AND LOW IF SIDE COMB A]R DUCI IS
USED OR 79 SQUARE IF VENTED VERTICALLY
Ct L.-** t -.+.-r-"---
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMEI',I1I ,*)
JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: M99-0108
ISSUED
08/1"0/L999
o8 /TL/L999
02/07 /2000
970-949-0200
970-949-0200
******l************************************************************:l*********
DECI.ARAT]ONS
I h.rcby rsknarlqdgr Chrt, I brvc rqrd lhk a;rylication, fiLled oub in fu11 the infonatien rcqui.rcd, cc'uplogsd rn rccuraea plol
plan, .nd .grt. ch.c rll ch. infon tlon provid.d .. r.quircd is correcc, I .9r.. Eo couply rith !h. infon tion .nd pl,ot pl.n,
tg coq)Iy rilh all Torn ordlnrnc.€ |nd .t.t. Irt'€, and t'o build tshi6 structsuis according to t'ho Torn'a zonLnE .nd .ubdivitlon
codc.. d.algn r6v1.r .!rprov.d, Unlfor[ Building codc rnd o!hc! oldinanc.E of tsh. aovn .ppticabt. !h.!.to.
RBQUESTS FOR rNgpECtIOl|S SItAt rr BB lttDB ltfENTr-FOUR HOURI!2133 OR AT OOR OFFICE FRO, 0:O0 Alt 5:O0 Ptlt
SIOnIAT'RB OF ONIIIIR, 08 COIIIRACII)R FOR HIUSBI,P AND
o ***
!(n OF VlfL, COLOI.IDO StrEqurc
talaatttltaaatta!tattt.rtoattttttt{tt!ttt!roJati'!rrrartrrirjarrrrtrrrr
Ittrgrlc lf\rd.t ! RIC-054' leunB.L28.oo oalLLl9g LL ts7
Pryr.nE ll.shd ! Cf, rogrCioRr atrl/olclPt Xlc hit,: .n{
Pcrris tro. lt9-olog tt'p. ! l-||BcH - rEcHlf,tclr PEn!IT
Prrc.l Xo! 2103 - 12{-01-009
gle. lddt r.: 1339 IlgftuvEf cR,
r,ocrBio6 ! 1339 EaIlllVEf (n
.totrl laar 3
121.00 llotrl lt,I, Plg. I Ilrl. P.!,r3rc
l€count Cod.
ttatttlltrattattiltitttrtlrt'tiiat!rli*tttattttttt.rrl|tttt!ttrattttt'ttt
Bahnca !
133. 00
128. 00
,00
lrcunE
100. 00
25.00
3.O0
D.r(Eilrclon
l|D o0100003t11300 t|lClnrlCllr Ptl||tr Fllg
P! 0010000!112300 Prnlf cHEctr Pllg
rc o010000tt12aoo rn! car.r. aPlc[ICD tlE
t* o" vArL coNsrRucrroN
PERMIT APPLICAT-ION FORM
APPIJICATION MUST BE FILI.,ED OUT COMPLETEIJY OR TT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED
Architect:
ceneral Description:la *gPoo bailwrrritt^-2t4@? bqllet!- ta":
qea
work class: t l-New{X-Pipi*4 ^rc A,rYYo4
Alterdtion t I -Additi
>el'avqer bai IqZ -nepair [ ] -other-
Nudber of Enrelling units . TriVak lno,^^.-Number of Accommodation Units plL.
Gas Logs- wood/Pell
OnqV ph.
I -Electrical Xl -Other lA<rJ..
eC) a
OTHER:
TOTAL:
* * rt rt * * * * * * * tt * !t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VAITUATIONS * t' * * " * * * * * * ,. * * t' * * * * * ,. L * * *t *****
******************f of vail Reg. NO.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * tt * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONrRACTOR INFORMATION *********************
;ilru
1rX.;?"
Phone
Town
Phone
Number:
of VaiI
Number:
Reg NO.
of Vail Reg
Number:
NO
;;:l""i'ffill,.lhs[i]F-
FOR OFFICE USE * * * * * * * * t! * * * * * * * * t' * * * * * * * * * * * * *
BUII-.DING PI,AN CHECK FEE:
-
PI.,IJMBING PI.,AN CI{ECK FEE:
MECHANICAL PLAN CIIECK FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
FT.VAI,UATION BUII.,,DING:
ZONING:
=========-====Il======= ==================== = = = = = === = = = = = = = = == = === = == ===== === = =
Gn c..Mechanical Contractor :
Address:
****'trrtr*t * * ** * rr * L * * * * * * * * * *,( * * * *
BUII.,DING PERMIT FEE:
PLUMBING PERMIT FEE:
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
Date Receivet
*******dlPk;-/-4{;P-3*i*o*?l*** pERMrr TNF6RMATT'N **rk**rt*t *rt******************rr
[ ]-Building t l -Plurnloing [ ] -E1ectrica1 t
ilob Address:Filing
Address
Address
Number and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appl-iances
BUII-,DING:
PLI]MBING:
ETECTRICAL:
MECHANIEAI,:
General contractor3
Address:
Electrical contractor :
Address:
Plumbing contractor:
Address:
AUG 0 5 1999
.t
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: Hovey Residence
Project Description:Landscaping Addition
Owner, Address and Phone: Nancy Hovey, c/o Black Knight Partners,0 Woodhem Road,
Manchester, MA 01944, (9781 526-1 464
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Land Designs by Ellison, Attn: Kathy Aalto, P0 Box 1259,
Avon, CO 81620, 949-1700
Project Street Address: 1339 Westhaven Circle
Legal Description: Lot23'. Glen Lyon
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Building Name:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Town Planner: Brent Wilson
Date: 3126/99
Board / Staff Action
Action: StaffApproved
F] E VER YO.\-E\DRB\APPROVAL99\HO\IEY. WPD
DRB Fee Pre-Paid:No Fee Required
Qucstions? c"n Planning Staff at 479-2128
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring Dasign Rcvicw approval. Any projcct rcquiring dcsign rcvicw must
rcccivc Dcsign Rcvicw approval prior to submitting for a building pcrnrit. For spccific infomration, scc thc submittal
rcquircmcnts for thc particular approval that is rcqucstcd. The application cannot bc acccptcd trntil all the rcquircd
infornration is subnrittcd. Thc projcct may also nced to bc rcvicwed by thc Town Council arrd./or thc Planning and
Environmcntal Commission. Dcslgn Rcvicw Board approval cxpircs one ycar aftcr final approval unless a
building permit is lssucd and construction is started.
A.DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST:
B, LOCATI
lqtq WeclV^,/,,^ (;n)r-
(Contact Eaglc Co. Asscssors Officc at 970-328-8640 for parcel #)
ZONING:
.1tu
PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
PARCEL #:c.
D,
E.
TOWNOFVATI
NAME OF OWNER(S):
MAILING ADDRESS:
OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
PHoNE: (11h\ 6LL.1414
%J,
tL
F.
c.
H,
NAME OF APPLICANT:
MAILINC ADDRESS:? o box 'ltq'\Avan LD $tb'l-D
PHONE: 141. l'1""
TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEE:
D Ncw Construction - 11200 Construction of a ncw building.
Includcs any addition whcrc squarc footagc is addcd to any rcsidcntial or
commcrcial building.
Includcs minor changcs to buildings and sitc improvcnrcnts, such as.
rcroofing, painting. window additions. landscaping. fenccs and rctaining
walls. ctc.
tr Addition -$s0
p.Minor Altcration - $20
DRB fccs arc to be paid at thc timc of submittal. Latcr, whcn applying for a building permit, plcase idottify
thc accuratc valuation ofthe projrct. ThcTown of Vail will adjust thc fcc according to thc project valuation.
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLTCATTON,ALL SUSN,irrrnl, REQUTREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
vArL. col,oRADO 8t657.
{tEr!r E|ri AE,fiuA rluufl;
+L.
r.ocAT
lPTION. OF THE REerj€tiTr
3.??-99 3:07FtU; 8459742 .>97Q 478 1722;
Quca(ions?Plrnning Sratf 511 {79.2128
/1TTI,ICATI()N FOR DESICN REI'IEW AI,PR(,VAL
o
Cull rho
#2t?
%A,
llD
qeN$RAt. lNFQBI,IAIIQN
Thi,r rpplirxtion ig for any Frojccl rcquirirB flcxign Rcvir,r,v tpnnrval, Arly_pr(isst rcquiting dcriign rcvicw rnust rocgivc f)onign Rovi*w *pp'ovol pi"' r' "i11n';1,f,rg nii riuuirourg pqrnril. For spurcifir: infor[ra(ron, fisc thc sublrrirt'l roqrtircrni?ll'{ I'or thc Fnrliuular approvol rhal i* ,cqu-orrcd. itrc applicatirrn qanftrt trc rcccprrrl rrntil rlt rhc rcSuircrl inl'urnutlnn is subrnirtcd, 'l hc proj$tft{y also nccd to io r.rri"*"a Uy rhc Town (lountil alr&or tho ploning ..,,,r,l lirtvin'nmnnutcommlsslotr' ticsignn.Jifi-i;tiirrpr,r""r"*piritonsior.in.iii*rrpprovrtunte*rr
bullfing pcrmit as tfrurtt rnd conrtrucrion ti ,f".roA "'"
A.
IJ,
c
lJ.
ti.
OLOCK:-, *_ FrLtN'e_ :
al FFrrsrcAt. ATfTRESS: Irf ln Waqt.tUrarC_lr"r"_=:_
frr rrl.r..T'ARCEL #:-_- (C'ontact Eaglc Co Asscs.sors (lfficc ar 970-?1R-Rr{a ro,. F.naot ,,,r}ZONIN(i:
NAMU r)!'owNElt(.$):
MAlI.TNC ADI]RESS:
elwNitR(s) st sNATU RE($1:
pttoNG, _ (4,rc\ 6zt_,.-.14r,1
NAME OFAPPLI(jANT:
t'.
G.
MAILING AIrpnI;s$; P o
Con$lnlcholl rrl ncw btrildrrtg.
lrrelxrlrr uny oddi.;6rr .+h$!$ rrquirrc momgc tg c.ldcrl l0 ilny ffsidcfll.al (.t.cotnnrcri;ial huildins.
lrtt'ltrdcs trrinor. chuniger to buildirrgs and sitc iurprovcr.rlcnl!i, nlreh rr.
iiil."li: patnttns. window addiri*orrs.larrrtrcarr,^ri. riii..l._',i,iU icrarrriug
l'Kir ltq{ nftr to bc naid nt llrc timo of subruirral. latr,v. whcn oppryi'g for a [ruirding pcrnrit. prcrsc idcnrify (hc accuta(c valuotir'rn of thc p-iot. 'r'rt-t:inJ;,,i uu,t *r,, ool,rsr rho fr.c scr.ording ro ttre pro.ic,* varua{ion.
PI.IIASE SIJIIIIIIT'TIIIS AN.I!19.{]'ON, AI.,I,.\UBI}iITTAL I{EQ(JIR}:MENTS ANN
'tIE FEE 'rO .[ItE TIErARTMEIn'ol-c()MMUNnI"*,ta*nf
lif#ilff i.ffi $Lr:EE<r.,ul
PHONE: -141...-.1'1""Tvre or ftevrr.w AND Fljtj:E New (:onstrurtlon - il00
tr} A(lrtltior - SS0
F.ltllnol Allonli0r - C20
IOWN OITVAN
tt)
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: Hovey Landscape Modifications
Project Description: Additions to the previously approved landscapc plan
Owner, Address and Phone: Nancy Hovey
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Land Designs by Ellison, P.O. Box 7259, Avon, Colorado 81620 949-1700
Project Sheet Address; 1339 Westhaven Circle
Legal Description: Lot23, Tract B, Glen Lyon Subdivision
ParcclNumber: 2103-124-03-009
Commcnls:
Building Namc: Hovey Residence
Board /StaffAetisn
Action:Motion by:
Secondcd by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Town Planner: George Ruther
Date: September 16,1997
That the applicant bring the exterior lighting on the property into compliance prior to
the start of work on the landscape modifications. Upon completion of the exterior
lighting work, the applicant shall contact the Town of Vail to schedule an inspection of
the exterior lighting. Failure to due so will result in a zoning violation.
DRB Fce Prc-Paid: $20.00
PLANT LEGEND
Kev Botanical Name Common name Size otv
AG Acer glabrum Rocky Mountain Maple 4-5'B&B 5
AM Aronia melonocarpa Black Chokeberry 5 qal.5
JB Juniperus hor. 'Blue Chip'Blue Chip Juniper 5 oal.5
LI Lonicera involucrata Twinberry Honevsuckle 5 oal.7
PG Potentilla fruticosa'Gold Drop'Gold Drop Potentilla 5 oal.7
Ph Physocarpos monogynus Mountain Ninebark 5 oal.11
PP Picea pungens Colorado Spruce 8-14',8
PM Pinus mugho Muqo Pine 30-36"B&B 3
PT Populus tremuloides Aspen 2.5" ca|. sinole 3
PT Populus tremuloides Aspen 2.5" ca|. clumc 1
PV Prunus virginiana'Shubert'Canada Red Chokecherrv 2"cal.s nqle 1
RA Rose x'Adelaide Hoodless'Adelaide Hoodless Rose 5oa 9
RH Rosa harisonii Harrison Yellow Rose 5oa 6
RR Ribes silvestre'Red Lake'Red Lake Currant 5qa 9
RW Rosa woodsii Native Shrub Rose 5qa 5
SF Spiraea bumalda'Froebelii'FroebelSpirea 5oa 7
SP Sambucus pubens Red-berried Elder 5ga 7
SS Sorbaria sorbifolia Ash-leaf Soirea 5oa ?
VJ Viburnum juddii Judd Viburnum 3-4'B&B 3
VL Viburnum lentago Nannvberry Viburnum 4-5'B&B 3
Assorted Perennials - Planted in beds
Assorted Perennials - Planted in naturalized areas with native grasses
TRANSPLANT LEGEND
Botanical Name Common name
Prunus virqiniana'Shubert'Canada Red Cho
Populus anqustifolia Lanceleaf Cottonwood
Purole leaf Plum
Colorado S
Note: all plant material disturbed due to grading shall be transplanled and relocated to a site near the
original location. Existing perennial beds shall not be dislurbed where possible.
GENERAL NOTES
o O
__..*_-.'rowN OI; \'All,lrl( t. rr I tio
| , _ r)t.:r^ ll.r,\l t.:;\_r ( [. (]())lr|l^|l-r, r)r:\.1:t.OIIt r,.\,
,,,,,, L Afl aLDe; <6r,s_l>q €)!r+ ov._
,\ r)t)llr.ss__ _ __
t ,| oJ |:cr
cl lllcxs ilar)ltl.{ \' I t,E TO t O$'n- () t: \.Afi.A Ccot'j\_r.\o -
l,]-ir<t(to-ti.fl L -0'i10rirT42-r j:i
0 i-it((iita i:ilr '
tfi'(r0oo 4ll i.t -
() l o0(l() 4 t.1 l'l
r nDDrrDsTTi,l
ri jrNli.g$,i_l,+JrP+-ffiF
:L I In NtL'n l_ c'()1)lt
*Ti;8iliT-i+iT+l?;!H;
lllr-c'eI)-Ill
,u.J!'rr I ht I s (1,.t YI.n
Sr(ir.r llii'i
niirll i'riln V'tr-^t{i-i
l"li sce I I aneous Cash
l-I,. i,r,i i r-i $t* i I -!t 1.1: I,tt: li is'''i(il
.i | (,(,(x) 4:i I t(l
trt rj(rrrrf?;tiii I r rii-hiiiril-?. i ft i i tiioorxr.iiiirrl
ti-i i'itOitll.t7l-
't i i\i r;A iix
r(rV niir\il;'i'iilli iii.ri't'.i'iPIF t. + .r.j'i1i_,::l+
Flr:,::oun t. 1+ r::E: 1+ ;ir:il:;
LHi.{ti trE:;IGl.{:; t,ri, ELL_I:;uf..l It.lrj'..itF:F FEE
Rtl,:un t t'=r'rdBr*d :. ,i!:1. t:1r:i
'l'h-.{n iir-if
ItUir.iltiT(;-
f illlta'-'-
-----_-TI;Cli I tem paid
H 1$tjr:184 1 il:i 10r:ir:i
tl.h.inge re t u rnE,.l i
ffnrc'unt paid
:$. rjtl
r-1 , L1!-1
\rtlLl
IttitTiO-Ni
I ItOO'tJlr f.l o-l ('(iNi jt' l'iO i lrll,Xn:ii.iOL
4tl xTuRl'dn-
st,-i-icmI-D
r-HJf htt<
ic'Lrt ':.-1:-.f,l e f f,.:H_l IflH
:l
'|--
1i
t.'
() | ()()(t0 4 t.ii I
cAsII r-------J "*.,1&11
' rlr.oL!xec.svr I-/UJ 1\
e fv
+'t
fr+atf Hl
arrl I
f'l g
f+.fli
tl Fq
/,^r5 \@ |1 r.l
-L't g t+d f-l t>\-
cl
t1
F F)r?a+
-
/1^t-\c9 t
E
PI a{}l-\
HI
-
-a f-e
-.-f -rtl
E'fg
t}.?
Ft
a+'
E
-f9
-?lra a+
..J -: ,_\ --:--.: -: :-: i +;;*
-:-i-+:=c ;..-::r --i':a>:'n7-<
^\./-i :>-r=
av-.j'1 3i+r >ii-
2:Xr:-zs<i _\ i. (->^--'-
F
E-;3*:e ;:t yuz < _:: _..:
--!4-i >=o ::- -X>-.xzr iO=\F
z I/"c /.\ :- -*<F a_ _..1 -r:->>
;* !- '?.vQz >--i
A..-!4
.\ i:: u x'n z;:
="";:Zc.A,^Z _.l r-\ _r..j
al > \,)
.z=g
:rE
^ . ,; l-.!;<;
-iA ca-r^.F - tl
(J
'I
lr:
7
rq
F'
H
rl'z
F'
:-l
a
a
=
I
b
I
I
a :
-
z
\o
I
tJ
z
14 €
H z
l-
-
H
z c)
'-
-'
l_
l:
L
3
=.
=
12 t>tz
lc)
l*It
l<
lcrt
l:
F<
€
H
z
H
c-
H
-
P
Si-RE
:IN H ;ll Yr'^t':l r.tlt^ rc
llo K\FV li
$t
=-a_72\
=ll/4, \ag/
inEr€E
eliiEa
1B'F i FE Ellii?
gF 13; E ;iirli
F;€iBI
g?r*x
oco:llr-i=at*
5H564
q,5
;> --\
Jfr
..i- u
C
$
\\-q _-\
N \)
^s
G\
R---
)
C-.
-.:
(-/)
S C>
9€"5 P.62 6e 526 o AVG-27-96 TUE t5: l BUG PARTNERS 3 BIG a
e fg
F3
{*Itr Hl
|{f f'l gl
fr+rg
El Hf
e r-t
{-1
H *t gt
R
-1.1 ,Y \-
el ;1
E F?a-r
cr \E9 Hl
E g
F}l Frr
IH
E
-dr v d)tt rtl
E .tt !t
tr3 tt t+
F |r
:3 f+
x n+
o
!:1 A t
.j >I
(
'.:
tr
E
Fi
7t vr
>
7.-J
rc F t
z
{
-l
&!
I -
t
3
:H
a
.1<r!5F *.x H :,i qn
HF
FZ r)x:zii oer {o
-?l **t
tn
{z
E I
F FI v,H
H fl Cl
o
I
i<l.
@
=
3
;
z
ld io
I
t'.)
P
P
i
I i
E
:.i
o i!
I
k
F l H E
t EI D tr H
i.
w
t t-a v
E n
F
I
a
i
g
6-:
0c
lo
lF ll0 IF
l8
HE to
I
g
g-
F'
u
I
L-.
b-r
UJ
l\o h
H
E
lt'
F
FI I
F
F.|.h
E
F
I
I
I
I
I
r I
F
E
T r
*
lp
@
g
r
I r t
t r
r
l
tr r t'
f
It
I
a t
fl[
r I
F.
I t r
l.
I
B'r I
c
{E
t
R r
r
A
d {!
F
L{
F |<
h)d\
\.I o\
fr
2
n
a I
ll c I u
n r
D ?)
ea
o
lJ -/ --il i -.r x a.t- t r -tt
"u -Pn {aT
To:To$/n of Vall Bullding Department
Re:Certlfieate of Occupency (CO)
From: Charles F. Hovey, Jr.
Would you please corr6c{ the CO to reltect trat
NANCY MEYEh HOVEY
ls the propefi owner, and, the correct address ls
.|339 Wedhavbn Clrcle
vhlt, co
Thank you.
Please fonrvad the new GOto:
Nancy M. Hovey
Zero Woodholm Road
Manchester-by-the-sea, MA 0i 944-l 057
ll you have any questions, please call 508.526-7464
AUG-2?-96 TUE I,5 : 12 E I G EUG FARTNERS 526 98"5 P.BI
cloLH.Wfll/c,/'rf
lN CW rhll Pbr+ Sultc tA
E&rrlllA 02rN
6ltunl.tul4 hr r70.959o
lrmil 0llnfifiOQrcl,com
FEB-20-96 TUE 10:22
, '.'
BECK & ASSOCIATES FAX N0. 3039490318 O
. LETI Efl Or OFFOTTFORMAI
., .f$,1?":^ti'H_!jffi:
^"";:LH-.*,Tifr Ti*5'*'.
QIELOPEB&EIIIjYEMENIJCB!., MEI'I .
. THIS AGREEMTNT, I g"'mil#""",:*,T"tf*fft:k'm:t
_#ffiiit'_"yl
. WHEREAS, lh€ Dcv€tr,p-er,
_as a con(,ilion ol apprwalg, tt6 _Eovey re=;,t.n.=ffflt#lil.;;-ga- -- t s-ej' wish;; ;;.i;'iffiT
"everop€r .'provemenr
,,.--- w.HFr.tFts' rhe Dcvclopar is obligated to.provide $sqrrly or co[atera,r sutttcronr in rne SffiT'.:t"tl?l#t lo make roasonrnle provrer';ns ;icJmpuron or cenain rnpror€menr'
.. . WHEREAS, ihe naveloper wishes lo provide collsterel h guaranlec perfomanct of il,t ffJnT""", including constru*i.n or tnc'a#"llrJilr"#t ,rp,*u-enls by means or rho
Developer agreos to es
illif, il,',,*ffii#L'i.iJlif Th"'.'"11:lT*'sllilflm'f
"f"'#t,no,do,,ar
IqPFpVEMENT
Roof uodific.rEion pcr T.o-v. approvcd .te!3igtr_
P, 02
l,tolff, THI:REFORE. ln,clrlstdar ;qa ol ths followtng mutuat covFnants and agreements, lh€ Dovetoper and ttre Tovn aj;; f;iil;,
*:*li:',ll,lfr'ffi -'!fi,!?f
?"*ffi fl i,:1i1"il,1,i#?'-T;i'#'Jlfl l,€''cqu'|pm€nl .. .rurl, lrg._. The Duvelopcr *,irr .ompleii, -rn
a good.workmiiii-tr-*nn*,
"r mprwoftenrs as tieted *"r-.;-,lj!!.01_d;a;;il;;fi;ni *o rp*,,,..uons tited in rhc ottbo ol th6 ftmmunitv Devclopment neparfment, itrJ ioin or Vall, and lo do ail h,ork incid€ntat rherefo acco;din' ro dnc in .0ripti;;;;;iilini'lonowtng;
a, Such othcr de$i,gns, drawings, maps, specllications, skelches, and olher mener submiiled by tho^Devetopen, b. iddr;,o,
"ny
ot m, aOou+r"t r.nc.l 00v6mmental €ntltlcs.. ail saH wsilihatii" oon* unCor the inipcction ol, and t0 the satistactior or. nc rown Eilr';: ffi rown Buirdirrg orficiar, or ourrer olllolal from the,Town ot vair, ac ;;l;jIj uy"^nnnl^, rti*hicrs nr 16n/no dielfits.t-tl"h rg.pT:::19-rt ;r/qeei;i, ,il ,n"rr not b€ dcem'd .orolrto[nii,npproved arrd acccpted as complbieo oy rne ro"n oi vitlcil;;-6-,"."DcvEropment o"pahmcni "i; ri,juii.-wl[r"oepurrnrnt.
- 2. To secure .,'d 9jl-:,J.t::ferjoflrrancc o, its obtiqetions as set torlh her€ln, the uoveloper agrees lo provide secunry and colrataral as follows:
Pe!4 | olg
FEB-20-96 TUE 10:23 BECK &!$SOCIATES FAX NO, 303949!318
n *uo"*,"#"r"0,,0 t-
n"=.r_:,,.-'"".-t'in#J;,u"ffi
=rsi"'li
jlfi,r.ff ,,illr.ll.i,,?-soao__wlh
rmpr'ov'tnento sct torth Hbovc lr fhnr. rrlo"roirr, ilfi# il jl i!ro.r"n, by orrveropcr.
3.
et'uve toi "'"nlJ,:tilil"Jiiii'ff1'"j*3ilr-:Yq:d'"J"
the corrgtorsr onginarv rrr rorrh
iiltiH.Lli...,:"::Ts^;r;;,;:i"r:",tr,T: li"1}_":fil#;ffi#f*k fii1,111",.",,,,"
oiicrerion."'
Euu'r occepHnce bv lhe Town or arteinqtvo njrir'iri'ltir ba at thr rown,s sore
f :ryr"1""",til'?:"#ffi iilll';?TJg.'ll^'i:y-":-.phv€srhcroo',beriabreor *rie Ag.."emanr p'.r'ol" +; ;'*,fi"ud]litil-Str,li:%iLf:H#::.':,.,ir".lf,n,lg1*;any oticeror emFtolce ttrereot,-ti.ri-^fil-r_.r.3ny pemons oi pio*peity,iilurea Oy reason ot tlc narufe or said wodr,.brrl arr oi rirulaiirrr,.* .n.n ai,o *o ii,Ir7il!#* by rre Devotopcr.
o,,,a*.*l! DovcloFer her€by aoreei to indcrnnlfy Encr hotd harmlc,ss rhc To\.vn, and any of rle iil;;;Hili,ili,i,l#1,;":,m:n;l:::#*:f .Tfl,h*1#5."f ;',.1;1i rosses, crarm_g' d"rag"t or ritaDrtili". [r'Lrtnr,rn respect ttrereorj thai a'se ou o, or ErB basctl uoon-{1 r"rti'*ar*T,i'il o"*lf :f reunder: ano r-t 6-di,,eroper shart reimbursa the Town y.,fy_-d..n,
'oSir-or
,iii_7lb.nses reasonebty tncuf red by the To! n in connection w'h invesriga'ni oi ooi"iaiii
_.,,v ,rcn ros-i,
"i,"rm,
A;d;, rirbiriry 0r aqrion_rhls indemnitv p'wrsro-n-stirrle"iffi;iilir
16 any orirei riiil;;ry ffi;l,h*" o"rirop.i iiar
s tl is mutua'y egrcert tha'h:^.u::t,:!1, rnay appry to lhe Town dnd the Town shall authofieeJor paaa ti'reisi o-r iilJorr"ruror oepo.iteit Jiltr tri iJwn ro, *"tr care'ory of rrllprovern.enl,at srrcn r;me ii sran |mnl*"r""t5 ore conshucred In compunce wilh art plans and specitications as
-r;;#;jffi;""rror
64d sssoplpd by the Tovrn. Under no c.nditlon wili ths 6m6un1 or tn. .Ji[iIoiih"t t. n",ng held be reducecr b€row the amount nacessary to comdote sucrr improvJme-nts.
e
, lt-lT_llln detc(mines, ar tts sote discn+rian, that any o, thc |mprovementc 06ntcmplaled h€rcu4.rer are nor
"oncr*r.i..o ,n con,pllanco.wiin_tn_.,pfari, and spccjflcalionE $et torfi in rhis-A*r€smcnt
"" .'iL"i"-* ir,i,T,:.-:ljg,, i' pdr.grsph 2, th€ Town mey, hur shail nul be rcqu,r.c ro, rtr.dem ;;;;iJ;'l.r greo]r a, necessary io domprere rhe untinished rmprovcm.nrs.
_Tne eanrr Jn"u, j!*i'slJr, runds upon il[iJr;iliilom no rorryn ghrino rhat hc imrrovements travJno,t i".i'L#pn* as required by this agreemenr, The Bank shall not reQuire the concurrenan
"iitt"i"ir,"per priof to release ol the lunos lo the Town n'rshall ute Eank,be.req,it"Jio roriiy rioiperrdentry.that $uch rmprovgmenrs hdvc nol be€n #ll*tl.&lilulrcd bv tt'it .gt.J;6ni,I,r *rail rerease iln'r,,il',illLry upon rhc rownh
f the T:lg q r:rompletirrg thc work erceed lhe amount o, lhe <lepoett, lhe e)rces3,rosorher wilh inreresl ar.tri"vi r*"e"i i;-ry1, tf1il; il;'frili'{*e propeny anrr mav t.,c co,ccledtly civir uurt oi m"i r*G'ritsd ro rhe ?r€asurer of Eogre counry to be c.flecr€d in rhe some manner as oe'rrnq,,e;i a.a uar:-r-.r l"f .r revied-frarnsr auch property. rl lhe permit nd*l,ly._:lL"**;:iffi"" rhe ct€anup and hnoscafing, ss ctefined in rhis ' chaptor, sucr fairure or rotu*^'
"nart't, Jonoider.d a vioration of the z_bniie code.
7. Tne Oonetoper warranfs all work an_d,.natorlot lor r period ol one )r€ar atter acc€plance ot .lly-otk rstgrod _ro r t ir-egi"emenr by the Town li su,, work is located on Town of Vail property o,
"rirln ro"n'"irfr'lght_or_*ny ptrrsuanl lc sccrion r7_10.250,
8' T'e panies hcroto nrdhatv adr6e lhar ,ris ngroemcnt may b€ dmen.r*, from time to time, provlded ttrot su"i "i"tilLij * ,n wrtftng and cxecrlca by a[ parucs harato.
Dated the day and year firel abovo wfitten.
P.03
i
Prgc a ot 3
FEB-20-98 TUE 10r24 FAX NO,303949 P. 04
8IATFtr coLstuno )
cortfry gF [Aar_a |0..
,4-lft btr, t!l:ot"gn1p Dcwlqear rrnolorr.iiAr. r.-. ___-e.&U!,
I - t rg"i;i -'Fftiffi,fflsg,.ar wls ru'q,rodssd b..i',D,,r, h'
Whorr ,ry irq6 q66 olfrirt rad.
)
.JryC
Flil-ncnEffi Urx175lEVE!6pilENi
I
) *c.
I
rg - b,
rt it'!g"ln9 o.nlopor lmp,rre,r*.r A'r..rri wro o.funor,b '--Y'---r--
---_+ dipd brlon nr $-.-d"yd
.. fUltmg n, hrad qnd ddal roq,
tt omartcoon rpirrsi __.__
$IATE oF cot ofiADo
6r^7E OF CgLqUnO
COIJI{IY OF bAcLF
#"k4,
coUNTYqFEAOLE
^
'gc,fM!4
Itttnmr my hrm anc oilklri
My corn rr|on rpi.4: 6'
rrar.$ftnowh.f€d bcb, ^ N^
F.ti ! rr 3
FEB-20-96 ruE 10:24
'mffim.
Dqclftfrr _ a ut rL lrg.O0 Ir-tr6. f[{th - t/hrr |t! ggq.gg
€htllay lulld 46 1gg."1,
r.-noor .rd rlarhrns _;;:h'' rt tlu'oo
lLucoa tAC trl|t - 0Orrr ttnqo ||,rrtnty lloclllenrqrn 1at*-,.lo
Ilrr!.1lhagu. r,lho! - lo/hr. tt ilo.oo
!oAl& Ir_llrrro
BEcf{iocrATEs FA)'N0.3oll58 P. 05
E {oo.oo
t ,r00.00
t too.Oo
t r00.00
I !00.o0
I rqr.0o
a 306. Ao
llr t00. oo
TOWN OFVAIL
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT
PROJECT TITLE: HOVEY RESIDENCE
NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT PCTMit
Al-,L TIMES
#: 895-0210
75 South Frontage Road
YaiL Colorado 81657
970-479-2138/479-2139 Job Address
FAX770_479_2452 Location...
Parcel No..Project No,
APPLICANT BECK & ASSOCIATES,
P O BOX 4030, VAIL
CONTRACTOR BECK & ASSOCIATES,
P O BOX 4030, VAIL
OWNER HOVEY CHARLIE
Departrnent of Community Development
: 1339 GREENHILL CT : SAME : 2103-124-03-009 : PRJ95-0130
INC co 81658
INC co 816s8
Status,..: ISSUED epplied..: 0?/to/Le9s Issued...: 07/26/1995 Expires..: ol/22/I996
Phone: 3039491800
Phone: 3039491800
Phone : 508-526-7 464
Description:NEw SFR
Occupancy
DweJ-Iings Private Garages
Type
Zone 3 V-N
Zone 3 V-N
Restuarant Ptan Reviey--)
DRB Fee--------
Recreation FeF--------->
Ctean-Up Depos i t------->
TOTAL FEES-----
Number of Dwelling Factor Sq. Feet
Units: 001
Valuation
7 08 t235 .64
18, 650 .70
726 t886.34 726,886.34
726,886.340
Table Date: 06/20/1995
Fi reotace lnformation: Restri cted:
t32 .43 Masonry 39.10
SubtotaL:
Total Valuation:
Town of Vail Adiusted Valuation:
#0f Gas App t i ances:#0f Gas Logs:#0f tlood/Pa I tet:
TotaI catculated Fees--->7 ,385 .95
Addit ional Fees---------> .00
Tota[ Permit Fce--------> 7 ,385.95
5, 348
477
5,825
tffir#****#*rwffittffiffi**tHrff.****t#ff** FEE SUff'lARY
Bui Ldi ng-----)
Ptan check--->
lnvest igat ion>
tli L l. caL L---->
3,218.@
2,111.20
.00
3.00
400.00
873.75
750.00
7 ,385 .95
Payment > 7,385.95
ffiffitHl.ffi#*fi******t*,rHffiff**ff***#**************ffffi*****t********#*#**#*ff***
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 07/L8/t99s cHUcK Action: AppR Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
07/L4/1995 LAUREN Action: AppR ITem: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
O7/L9/t995 DAN Action: APPR Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS
07/L9/1995 CHARLIE Act,ion: APPR
BALANCE DUE-_-
Dept: BUILDING Division:
Dept: PLANNING Division:
Dept: FIRE Division:
Dept: PUB WORK Division:
ffi **ffi ttrt'r'rffi l'r}/r**u.ffi **ffi tr***ffi ******i#***********ff *ff #**tiH*ffi ******#***ff *ffi ***#ffi **#
See Page 2 of this Document for any conditions that nay apply to thj-s pernit.
DECLARATIONS
I hcreby ecknoHtedge that I have read this apptication, f il.l,ed out 'in ful.t the inforDation required, conpteted an accurate ptot
Ptan, and state that a[[ the infornation provided as required is correct. I agree to conpty nith the infornation and pl,ot ptan,
to conpty lrith att ToHn ordinsnces and state [aws, and to buiLd this stnucture according to thr Toun,s zoning and subdivision
codcs, d.sign reviev appnovcd, uniforn Building code and other ordinances ot thc Toyn appLicabl,e thereto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I.IADE TI,IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE
Send CLran-Up Drposit To:
tS'**o'u"
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
Department of Community Development
PAGE 2
t *tpy',1pr!7p!41!!*5t*****************************************************************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: 895-0210 as of 07/26/95 STaLus: ISSUED
***************************************J,***r.************************************
Pernit Type: NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT Applicant: BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC
Job Address: 1339 GREENHILL CT Location: SAME
Parcel No: 2IO3-L24-03-009
Applied: 07 /I0/!9e5 Issued: 07 /26/1995
***********rt****rk*rtr******!t******************************************************
CONDITIONS ********************************************************************************
1. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH
SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PR]OR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION.
2. ATTIC SPACES SHALL HAVE A CEILING HEIGHT OF 5 FEET OR LESS,
AS MEASURED FROM THE TOP SIDE OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF
THE FLOOR TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMEBERS OF THE
ROOF DIRECTLY ABOVE.3. Exterior light.ing plan must be approved prior to installatio
n.4. Linits of disturbance fence shall remain in place throughout construction
{g*"n"uo'*o
a
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAfL' COLORADO Statemnt ****************************************************************
statemnt Number: REc-0049 Anount: 7,385.95 07/26/95 13:33
Payment Method: CK Notation: 645L Init: AB
Permit No:
Parcel No:Site Addrese:
Location:
This Palanent
Account Code
01 0000 41310
01 0000 41331
01 0000 41332
01 0000 22002
30 0000 45032
01 0000 41336
895-0210 Type: B-BuM NEw (sFR'P/s,DuP) PE
2to3-724-03-009
1339 GREENHILL CT
SAI'fE
7 t385.95
!****************************************************************
Total Fees:
TOTAI ALL PNtE:
Balance:
Description
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
DESIGN REVIEW FEES
PLAN CHECK FEES
CLEANUP DEPOSITS
RECREATION FEES
WILL CALL INSPECT]ON FEE
7 ,385,95
7 ,385,95 .00
Amount
3,i48.00
400.00
2 |LLL.2O 750.00
873.75
3 .00
,t.\-0)r - \-
^
\01 tr --.''
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEIII,IIT INFORMATION *****************************
[x.]-Buildinq [ !-Plunbing gx1-Electrical [ ]-Electrical [ ]-other
Job Name: Eovey Residence Job Address: 1339 Westhaven Circle' Vail' CO
Legal oesc@ck-sfsn ririns
Owners Name: Charlie & Nancy HovelAddress: 0 WoodhoLn Road Ph. 508s267464
Architect: Dave PeeI Address: P-O. Boz L2O2, VaiI ph.476-4505
General Description: New Residence
Work Class: [ 4-New [ ]-Alteration [ ]-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-Other
Number of Dwelling Units: I Number of Accommodation Units:
Number and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances Gas Logs I Wood/Pellet
********************************** VALUATIONS *********************************
BUILDING: $545,850.00
Plunbing Contractor:
Address:
PLWBING: $24,448-00
****************************.---\ t1 </2) ^^,1 .iz!Jr/; e/V@
General contractor: Beck
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
N/A
Contractor: Beck and Associates
ELECTRICAL: $22,280 -OO
uEcHANrcAr, : 32770 o . 6-o'
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
- AA tr,
OTHER:
TOTAL: $519,778-OO
****** * ** * ****** ********* **
Town of Vail Reg. No. 117A
Phone Nurnber: 949-1800
Town of vail Reg. No.
Phone Number:
Town of Vail Reg. No.
Phone Number:
Town of vail Req. NO.
Phone Number:
oFFICE USE *******************************
BUTLDING PI"AN CHECK FEE:
PLI,'MBING PI.,AN CHECK FEE:
MECHANICAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:
CLEAN.UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEEg:
BUILDING:
N/A
Mechanical
Address:
Contractor: N/A
******************************** FOR
BUILDING PERMIT FEE:
PLUMBTNG PERMIT FEE:
MECHANICAL PERUIT FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
oTHER TYPE oF FEI.zfu
VALUATION
ZONING:griature:
a*dH
'FFICE GOPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V47e-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
(303) 47e-2138
Plan analysis based on
the l99l Uniform Building Code
Project Number: PRJ95-0 I 30
Address: 1339 WESTHAVEN CR.
Planner: Lauren
Occupancy: R3,Ml
Type of Const V-N
Department of Conmunity Development
Namc: HOVEY RESIDENCE
Datc: July 18, 1995
Contractor: BECK & ASSOC.
Architect: D. PEEL
Engincer: NEUJAHR
Plans Examiner: CHUCK FELDMANN
a eomplete
a quide to
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to J-isting of aII possible cod.e requirements in the L991 UBC. It selected sections of the code.
AREA MIN,LIGHT MIN.VENT NO.EXITS EGRESS
be
i^
FL
2 llaster bedroom 253 2 Master bath 190 2 Bedroom 255 2 Ha11s. closets, etc. 5l-7
TOTAL FOR FI.,OOR 1.226 l- Bedroom 272 1 Dining room 285 L Living room 392 1 Game room 289 1 Office 259 1 Krtchen 230 1 Hal1s. closets. etc. LI75
TOTAIJ FOR FLOOR 2902 B Furnace room 101 B Garage 47'7 B Den 253 B Mud room 95 B Hal1s, closets, etc. 77L
TOTAIJ FOR FLOOR L697
BUIIJDING TOTAL 4L28
26.30 13.15 0.00 9 .50 25.50 12.80 0.00 0.00
zt.zv rJ.bu
28.50 L4.25 39.20 19.60 28.90 t4.45 25.90 12.95 23.00 11.50 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
z).5v rz. bf 0.00 4.75 0.00 0.00
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
{g *rn"rro ru"*
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 8/,657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Department of Community Development
FOOTNOTES:
1) EGRESS - An operable window or door that opens directly to Lhe exterior is required from this room. The minimum clear openable area must meet the following. -- Sec. 1204.
1) The minimum clear height is 24 inches 2) The minimum clear width is 20 inches 3) The minimum clear area is 5.7 square 4) The maximum sill height is 44 inches 2) The number of exits is based on Table 33-A 3) A mechanical ventilation system may be used
openings for vent.ilation. -- Sec. 1205. (c)
4) The requirement for an egress window in the
Sec . l-2 04 .
feet
( Dwel l ings )in in lieu of exterior
basement is based on
ROOM DIMENSIONS:
Habitable space shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet 5 inches. Kitchens, halts, bathrooms and toilet compartments may have a ceiling heiqht of 7 feeL measured to Lhe lowest projection. If the ceiting is sloping, then the minimum heiqht is required in only 1/2 ot the area.
- - sec. L207 . (a)
Every dwelling unit shall have at least one room which has not less than 1,20 square feet of floor area. OLher habibable rooms except kitchens shalI have an area of nob less than 70 square feet. -- Sec. 1207. (b)
Habitable rooms other Lhan a kitchen shall not be Less than 7 feet in anv
dimens ion .sec. 1207. (c)
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS:
AII glazj.ng in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazinq material . -- Sec. 5405. (d)
1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies,
2) Glazinq in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging d.oors other than wardrobe doors.3) Glazinq in storm doors.4) clazing in alI unframed swinging doors.5) Glazinq in doors and enclosures for hoL tubs, whirlpools. saunas, sbeam rooms, baLhtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a buitding wall enclosing t.hese compartments where the bott.om exposed edge of the glazing is less than 50 inches above a sbanding surface and drain inlet.5) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of Lhe glazxing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edqe of Lhe door in a closed position and where the bott.om exposed. edg.e of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface.7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, ot.her than those l-ocalions described in items 5 and 5 above, than meets all of the following conditions:
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square f eet..B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor.C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor.D. One or more wal-king surfaces within 35 inches horizontallv of the plane of t.he glazing.
{p *""'"""o '*"r
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657
970-479 -2 1 3 8/479-2 I 3 9
FAX 970-479-2452 8) Glazing in raj-lings regard.less of heiqht
Included are structural baluster panels
panel s .
Department of Community Development
above a walking surface.
and nonstructural in-filI
See exceptions.
SMOKE DETECTOR REQUIREMENTS:
A smoke deteclor is required on the ceiling or wall at a point centrally
IocaLed in lhe corridor or area qiving access to each sleepr_ng area.
- - Sec. l-210. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is required on the ceiling or wall in each sleeping area. -- Sec. 1-21-0. (a) 4.A smoke detector is required in the basement. -- Sec. 12f0. (a) 4.A smoke d.etector is required on all stories. -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.If the upper level contains sleeping roorn(s), a smoke detector is required in the ceiling of the upper level cfose to bhe stairway.-- sec. 1210. (a) 4
Smoke detectors are required to be wired Eo the buildinq's power source and
shal-l- be equipped with a battery backup. -- Sec. 121-0. (a) 3.Detectors shall sound an alarrn audible in all- sleeping area of the dwelling in which they are located, -- sec. 121-0. (a) 4.
FIREPLACE REQUIREMENTS :
MASONRY FIREPLACE:
1) Fireplace must be supported by a foundation. -- Sec. 3707. (b)
2) The firebox must be at least 20 inches deep and walls of firebox are to be l-0 inches thick. If the lining is of firebrick then the walls
may be 8 inches thick. -- sec. 3707. (c)
3) The minimum clearance to combustible malerial is from the fireplace,
smoke chamber, and chimney walls is 2 inches. Combustible material may not be placed within 5 inches of fireplace opening and combustible within 12 inches may not project more than 1/8 inch for each L inch of clearance. -- Sec. 3707. (h)
4) The hearth must be noncombustible, a minimum of 4 inches thick. and supported by noncombustible material . The hearth size must be at least:If Opening size is: Front extension Side extension
L,ess than 6 sq. f t.l-5 inches 8 inches
12 i-nches 6 sq.ft. or greater 20 inches -- sec. 3707. (k) & (1)
5) Chimney height musc be per Table 37-B
FACTORY BUII.,T FIREPLACE:
1) Unit must be an approved unit.. -- Sec. 3705. (a)
2) Clearances and. hearth size must be per manufactures approval .-- Sec. 3705. (a) & (b)
3) Chimney height must be per manufacturer's approval and Table 37-B
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION:
Between the garage and the residence. materials approved for rhr fire construcllon are required on the garage side only and any doors between the garage and the residence are to be a serf-crosing 13/g inch sol-id core d.oor or a 20 minute fire door. -- Table 5-B & Sec. 503. (d) exc. *3
{i *"'"uo'*'^
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
D epartment of C ommunity D eve lopme nt
STAIR REQUIREMENTS :
A stairway in a dwelling must be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 3305. (b)
The maximum rise of a step is 8 inches and the minimum run is 9 inches.-- Sec. 3306. (c) exc. #L
Provide a handrail on one side a stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if there is 4 or more risers. -- Sec. 3305. (i)
Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. Minimum height
= 35 inches, maximum opening size = 4 inches. -- Sec. L712. (a) exc. #l
The minimum headroom is 5 ft.- 8 inches. -- Sec. 3305. (o)
Enclosed usable space under the staj-rs is required to be prot.ecled as required for thr fire - resistive construcbion,sec . 3305. (1)
SHAFT ENCLOSURES:
1) Chutes and dumbwaiter shaf t.s with a cross-sectional area of not more than 9 square feet may lined on the inside with not less than 26 gage galvanized sheet metal with all joints locklapped. The outside must be t hr construction. All openings into any such enclosure shall be protected by not less than a self-closing solid $rood door I 3/8 inches thick or equivalent. -- Sec. 1705. (f)
2) Gas vents and noncombustible piping installed in wal-l-s passing through 3 floors or less d.o not need. to be in t hour shafts.-- Sec. 1705. (c)
3) Shafts for g'as vents, factory-buiIt chimneys, pipinq., or ducts that do not extend throug'h nob more bhan 2 floors need not be in l- hour shafts.-- sec. f705. (c)
4) All oEher shafts are required Lo be enclosed in a t hour assembly.-- Sec . r705. (a)
ATTIC REQUIREMENTS:
1) Provide an access to alt attic areas with a clear height of 30 inches or more. The minimum size is 22 inches by 30 inches. There must be 30 inches or more clear height above the access. -- Sec. 3205. (a)
2) Provide ventilation in all at.t.ic areas. The net free vent area l-s to be not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of attic area.The vent area may be 1/300 if at least 50% of the required ventilating area is provided by ventilators located in the upper portion of lhe attic. The upper ventilators nust. be at Least 3 feet above the eve or cornice venes.Sec. 3205. (c)
CRAWLS PACE REQUIREMENTS :1) Provid.e ventilation either by mechanical means or by openings in exterior wall-s. opening shal1 provide a net area of not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of area in crawl- space. Openings shall be distribuLed on two opposite sides and be located as close to corners as practical .-- Sec, 2515. (c) 5. Note: Vent openings may be reduced to 10% of the above if ground surface area is covered with en ar'1nr.\1/a.l rrrn^r laygier and the !.,,i 1,ai-- ^Er,i ^] ^r LrLrI J-IIIII9 (.)LLICIaI appfOVeS.For a 1525.0 sq.f t.. crawlspace area:Ratio Minimum sq.ft. of vent
10.17 I/L5O
{,2 *'"'"""*'*
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Department of Community Development
Provide 18-inch by 24-inch access opening Lo Lhe crawl space area. Note:
opening may be required to be larger if mechanical equipment is located j-n the crawl- space. -- sec. 25L5. (cJ 2,
Unless the wood is listed as an approved. wood. of natural resistance to
decay or treated wood. the minimum clearance between exposed earth and floor joist is l8 inches. The minimum clearance to beams and girders is is 12 inches. -- Sec. 2516. (c\ 2.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS :
For R3 occupancy
This project wiII require a site improvement survey. Such survey
sha11 be submitted and approved prior to request for frame inspection.
2l
?\
A11 crawl spaces within t.he Town Of Vail are limited structural floor ceiling heighL of 5', be earth floor
vent.il-aLed as per UBC 25L5(C)5 wi-th minimum access as 2515(C)2 and maximum access of 9 sq. ft.
Any building site with a slope of 30 degrees or more engineer design. Such design shall_ address drainage,
and sLructural desion.
to a earth ho
onIy, be per UBC
shalI require an
soil retainage
Excavation below slabs on grad.e shaIl not be permitLed wj_thout prior
approval .
Address numbers shal1 be posted plainJ-y visible and legible from the stree!.
For M1 occupancy
Slope garage floor to all-ow for drainage to outside to provide a floor drain with sand and oil intercepbor to dry well or to sewer.Any garage floor drain connected to sewer must be approved by Upper Eagle ValIey Water & Sanitation DisLrict.
In garages with living area above, the walls of bhe garage wiich are bearing the area above shall be protected with one hour fire resistive construction. UBC 503 (B) .
{j *r"r"uor*"o
-.--f .;o
EInter-Mountain
At.sineerineLtd.dr'flcF c0Py
Town of VLif
sorLs
LOT
AND FOIJNDATION INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
23, GLEN LyON SUBDMSTON
TOWN OF VAIL
EAGLE Cott}flry, COLORADO
PREPARED FOR:
NANCY AND CHARLIE HOVEY
PROJECT NO. 94627G
AUGUST 17, 1994
Box No.978 . Avon, Colorado 81620 . 94$5072 Denver8991531
1420 Vance Stre€t o Lakewood, Colorado 80215 . Phone: 232{158
$+.*i.39
V9'"'""'b+gt
%f:.r#
l.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONCLUSIONS
SCOPE
SITE IPCATION Al{D DESCRIPTTON
SITE IWESTTGATION
SUBST'RFACE A}ID GROT'NDWATER CONDTTTONS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
FOT'NDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
SI,AB CONSTRUCTION
GROT'NDI{ATER AND DRAIN SYSTEIT!
RETNFORCING
CRAWL SPACE COVER
BACKFTIJL AI{D SURFACE DRATNAGE
I,AWN TRRTGATTON
UTSCELI.ANEOUS
LOCATION OF TEST BORTNGS
SUMMARY OF TEST BORINGS
SWELL-CONSOLTDATION
PERTPHERAI.. DRAIN SYSTEIT
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
7
7
7
I
9
DR,AWING NO. 1
FTGURES NO. 1
FTGURE NO. 3
FIGI'RE NO. 4
-2
t/
ilrqfr
/
2
coNcLuSroNS
1. Subsoil conditions are fairly uniform over the site with about 1.5 feet of Topsoil over clayey-gravetly
SAND with sandstone rock fragrments over silty-sandy GRAVEL with sandstone rock fragments.
2. The proposed residence should be founded on undisturbed clayey-gravelly SAND with sandstone rock fragments with conventional spread ' footings designed for a rnaxirnun- soil bearing pressure of 2rOO0 psf.
3. The lot is classified as Geologically sensitive Area due to moderate debris flow on the official
Maps for the Town of Vait. Geoloqic hazard studies are outside of 6ur scope of services.
gCOPE
This report presents the resurts of a soirs and Foundation
rnvestigation for the proposed residence to be constructed on Lot
23, clen Lyon Subdivision, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado.
The investigation rdas prepared by means of test borings and
Laboratory testing of sanples obtained from these borings.
The purpose of this foundation exproration was to deterruine
the various soil profile cornponents and the engineering
characteristics of the foundation rnaterials, and to provide
criteria fronr a geotechnicar point of view, for use by the
structurar engineers in preparing the foundation design, and tbe
design engineers and architects in preparing grading and drainage
plans.
t'
3
grIE IJOCATTON AND DESERIPTTON
The site is 0.52 acres Lot located near the cul-de-sac on
Greenhill Court in the Town of VaiI, Eagle County, Colorado.
Westhaven Circle bounds the lot on the north side. The topography
of the lot is noderate to steep with steep road banks. The
vegetation consisted of' aspen trees with thick underbrush.
Drainage is the north. The Lot is vacant.
AITE TNVESTIGATION
The field investigation perforned.on August 3, Lgg0 consisted
of drilling, rogging and sarnpring 2 test borings. The locations of
the test borings.are shown on Drawing No. 1.
The test borings were drilled with a track mounted drilt rig,
with a 4-inch diameter continuous flight po$rer auger. summaries of
the test boring logs are detailed on Figures No. L - 2.
Laboratory sampres vrere obtained at selected intervals by
advancing a california thin tube sanpler and a split spoon sampler
into undisturbed soil, r+ith a 140 pound hammer farring free 30
inches
' These sarnples were returned to our laboratory, inspected and
crassified in accordance with the unified soir classification
systen and the test boring logs were edited as necessary. To aid
in crassifying the soils encountered, and to determine general soil
characteristics, selected laboratory tests (noisture content, unit
weight, swell/consolidation), $rere perforned on representative soil
samples. Summaries of the boring results are shown on Figure No.
i-,
qr o
SUBSURTACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDTTTONS
Refer to the summary of test borings, Figures No. 1 - 2.
Subsurface conditions are fairly uniform with about 1.5 feet of
Topsoil over clayey-gravelly SAND over silty-sandy GRAVEL with
sandstone rock fragments.
!{e understand that no overlot grading fras been done prior to
this investigation.
No Groundwater i./as encountered in any of the test borings at
the time of drilling.
Indexes to Geological Mapping, Eagle county, colorado,
prepared by Charles S. Robinson & Associates, INC., in 1975, states
that soils in this area are Alluvial fan and Debris fan deposits.
Review of tbe official Maps for the Town of Vail as per
ordinance No. 5 indicates that the lot is classified as
Geologically Sensitive Area based on the Debris-flow and Debris-
Avalanclre Hazard Analysis prepared by Arthur I. Mears, P.8., fnc.,
dated Novernber, 1984 .
Geologic hazard studies are outside ofour scope of services.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
No specific design data has been provided, but for the purpose
of this analysis, it has been presuned that the proposed residence
will consist of 2 floors with a basenent, and that loads will be
light. If the proposed project differs significantly frorn this
1
3.
-'5
understanding, a review should be rnade after the plans are more
conplete.
FOUNDATTON RECOM}IENDATTON8
clayey-gravely SAND with sandstone shale rock fragments will
be encountered in the foundation excavation. The proposed
residence should be founded on conventional type spread footings
designed for a rnaxinurn soil bearing pressure of 2roOO psf. The
footings should be constructed on the undisturbed clayey-graverly
SAND with sandstone rock fragrments.
The footing excavations should be rel.atively smooth, free of
debris, organics, Ioose soi1, frost, and standing wat,er. Any over-
excavations shourd be backfirled and conpacted to 1oo percent
within 2 percent of optirnum moisture as determined by a standard
Proctor Test (AsrM D-698). A representative of this office should
be contacted to inspect the foundation excavation to verify that
the soil conditions are the same as those anticipated in this
report.
After all of the finat grading is completed,. the boltorn of the
footings should be covered with a rninirnurn of 48 inches of backfill
for frost protection.
Voids }eft by the rernoval of cobbles in the botton of the
footing excavation should be firled with rean concrete or a.
granular soil with a maximun particle size of 3 inches compacted to
100 percent of Standard proctor Density (ASTM D-699), within 2
percent of optirnum rnoisture.
6
SIJAB CONETRUCTION
A11 excavations made for the foundations must be properly
backfllled with suitabre nateriar compacted to a mininun of 95
percent of the maximum standard proctor Density (AsrM D-G98). The
on-site soirs, exclusive of Topsoil and organics are suitable for
use as backfitL. Due. to the high content of cobbles and boulders,
it virl be necessary to screen out the larger rocks prior to using
'this material as backfilr. Before the backfiLl is praced, alr
water and loose debris should be removed from these excavations.
Prior to the construction of concrete floors, the undisturbed
.
subgrade, free from topsoil and organics, should be proof cornpacted
with a loaded rubber-tired loader to a uniforrn high density.
Special care shourd be taken in areas where underground, utilities
have been installed.
The floor slabs should be reinforced, and joints should be
provided at the junctions of the slab and. the foundation walrs, so
that a snall amount of independent movement can occur without
causing danage. The slabs shourd be scored in accordance with the
American concrete rnstituters recomnend.ations to contror cracking.
A granular mat (-3/4 inch gravel, with less than 5 percent
passing No. 200 sieve), should be provided berow the floor slabs.
This shourd be a minimun of four inches in thickness. The purpose
of this granular nat is to provide a capillary break between the
subgrade and the slab.
o
?
GROI'NDTATER AND DRITN SYSTEM
while no ground water hras encountered at the tirne the field
investigation was conducted, it is possible that seasonar
variations wilr cause fluctuations, or for a water table to be
present in the upper soils during the spring months, or after
prolonged periods of rain. A found.ation perirneter drain as
detailed on Figure No. 4 is recornrnended to reduce the risk of
surface water infiltrating the foot,ing subsoils.
RETNFONCING
The foundation should be werl reinforced and rigid enough to
withstand differential settlernents. Foundation walrs retaining
earth should be designed to resist an eguivalent fluid pressure of
45 pcf for an tractiverr case assuming a Lever drained backfill
condition.
cRAmr 8PACE COVER
l{hen moist soils are encountered in the excavation, the ground
surface in crawl space areas should be covered with an impervious
rnoi-sture barri.er sealed against the footings. This will help to
reduce huroidity in the crawr space area. The crawl space should be
vented.
BACKFU,IJ AND 8I'RFACE DRAINAGE
The backfilr placed around the foundation wal]s should not
settle excessivery after cornpletion of constructj.on and the top one
I
foot of the backfilr rnateriar nust be reratively inpervious. The
on-site soils exclusive of Topsoil and organics are suitable for
use as backfill. Due to the high content of cobbLes and boulders,
it will be necessary to screen out rarger rocks prior to using this
rnaterial as backfil.I.
Backfill shourd be noistened or dried to near its optirnun
rnoisture content and cornpacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum standard proctor Density. structural backfill should be
cornpacted to at least 95 percent of tbe maximuro Standard proctor
Density.
surface water running toward the structure from upsrope areas
should be diverted around and away frorn the building by means of
drainage swales or other sinriLar measures.
The finat grade should have a positive slope away
foundation walls on all sides. A rnininum of Lz inches in
1o feet is reconmended. Downspouts and sirl cocks should
into sprash brocks that extend beyond the lirnits of the
The use of long downspout extensions in place of splash
advisable.
IJAWN TRRIGATTON
Do not install sprinkrer systems next to foundation walls,
porches or patio srabs. rf sprinkler systems are installed, the
sprinkler heads should be praced so that the spray fron the heads,
under full pressure, does not farl within five feet of foundation
walls, porches or patio srabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
from the
the first
discharge
backfilI.
bLocks is
I
rf the future owners desire to plant next to foundation wallst
porches or patio slabs, and are willing to assume the risk of
structural daroage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers
and shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require Yery little
moisture. fhese flowers and shrubs should be hand watered on1y.
UISCEI,TANEOI'g
The recommendations provided herein are based on experience in
the area and from the on-site field exploration. The inforrnation
obtained form the tieia exploration and laboratory testing reflects
subsurface conditions only at the specific locations at the
particular tirnes designated. Subsurface conditions at other
Locations and times may differ from the conditions at these
locations. The extent of any variations between the test borings
may not appear evident until excavation is performed. However,
only rninor .variations are expected. If during construction
conditions appear to be different, this office should be advised so
re-evaluation of the recornmendations may be made.
lg
lhls report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Nancy
and Charlle Hovey for the speclfic appllcatlon to the proposed
resl.dence etructure to be located on Lot 23, GLen Lyon Subdivlsion,
Town of Vall, Eagle County, Colorado.
'lfhe flndings and reconnendations of thls report have been
prepared ln accordance with locally accepted professl'onal
engineering standards for sirnilar conditlons at this tine. There
is no other warranty, eitheir expressed or lmplled.
Sincerely,
INTER-MOI'NIAIN ENGINEERING, LTD.
Luiza Petrovska, P.E.
ProJect Englneer
qrJ
LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS
PROPOSED RES\DENCE
Lot 2J, Glen Llon Subdivision
Town of Voil, Eogle County, Colorodo
Prepored for:
Noncy ond Chorlie Hovey PRoJ€CI No.r 94627G
oR^$N BY: L.p. f
scre, ^, l,'M DRAV$NG N0.: I
HLE COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
September 5, 1996
Brian Bergstreser
Beck and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 4030
Vail, CO 81658
Re: Hovey Residence (Lot 23, Glen Lyon Sub.)
Deparunent of Conrmunity Development
Dear Mr. Bergstreser:
During the CO inspection of this home I identified a problem witb the number of light fixtures
located on the exterior of this house and also the need to make the flood lights on the house fully
cut-off You assured me that it would be taken care of the next day and based on this
commitment, a CO was issued on July I 8, 1996.
It is now nearly two months later and thc lights have not been corrected. I hope that you intend
to correct this issue and live up to the verbal commifinents made regarding this project.
Please take the time to correct the lighting on this home.
Tbanks for your cooperation.
Town Planncr
{S rr"r"rro rurr
FEB-13-1996 Lt3Fd.GFRDEN CENTER 3A3 949fl79 P.01
Hg+FRIH,M,?.rHfhE vAL
Londscope Achitecture ond Con$ruclion .ili iioi .-ti'r. c'rii;ii65s us@
February 8, 1996
Beck & Associatet
780 NottingbamRoad
Avon, Colorado
Re: Landecape Iffitallation at the llovey Residence'
DearKim:
Thank you for cnlling Matthews & Associates-witb your laudrcape needg at Ilovev Residence' We
appreciare thc oppomrrtyt6 riJp-;;;; h"at,*p.'#i;i;iiEG-tddtd tAte'and acstlretics to
yow ProJt)ct.
Matthews & Associarcs is a lanrtscape Architecturp design/build fq,-specializing in residentid
snd Cornmerciat r"ooscape-"iiiliilti. ilddtffi to oir dcsignibuild capebilitiel we also bave
irrisation and mai-otenand;i"t-i#;;i,t"fiih Th" Gatd"n Ceircr of Eaglc-Vuil. a retnil gardcn
;;-r;:-Th"G divGions allow Mattlrews &-Associates to bc a fi:ll scrvicc laadscape cornpany-
Enctosed is an estimate for plant installation rakcn from ttn landrcapc plan, whicb you supplied
(Sce cttacbcd Lilndscape Material Take-Otr)
Thig cstlnate takes into account thc following considerations:
It is assumed trat thp supptied grarle will be within l/10 of a foot of thc desircd finish
gade- If any g*dj"g an,ifbr topioit arr needed, they will bc supplied at timc & materials
ratgs,
The estimated cost to instal! the attachad plant matcrlal is $3,450.0O (Three Thousand Four
HwdredFifty Dollars)-
Please call with any qucsttons.
S incerely,
Richard ll. l,eeman, Jr.
landscape tuchitect
TOTAL P.gl
)')
futolrol
PROPOSAL SUBMTTTED
Edwards, Cotol (3o3) 926.5411
Proposal
a/ L7 /93
COI'ISTRUCI|ON, tNC.
(x)57
P.O. Box 11
Beck and Associates.tr.O. Box 4O30 Vail, Co 81658
I nc.
Page 10f
Job Name & Addres:
Hovey Regidence trav i ng
Westhaven Circle
Vai I
Date of Plam:
d'iP\
a""nrtiiriiin i
IRqy;'**"y2.
Phone: 949- 18OA
W6 h€r"by prcpo!.:
1. )
e.)
Frepare subgnade for roadbase and paving-subgrade to be reft at + or - .lO of a foot by exeavat inq contracton
Furnish and place 4r' of 3/4 roadbase to cover approx. rr41o sF of anea for a new driveway
Apply a soiL steri lant to prepared roadbase to inhibit weed growth.
Furnish and place 3" of new asphart paving to same area of approx.l,414 SF
)3.
4.
All ot ho above work to b€ completsd in a substantial and worlsnanlike mann€,lor th€ sum ol **l| 3r gOO. OO**Thr.ee Th,:r-rsand Eight Hundred dol lar.s and nol1OO
IMPOBTANT: The terms and condiliorc stated on the revers€ side heroof are expressly mad€ a part o, thb contracl Thb proposalshallnot b€com€ a binding
conltact unless end until lhe Acceptance ol Proposal and Cmtitmation by contractor on lhe r€v€rso sido hav6 b€on ex€cutsd. This proposall must be accepted
aE provided and doliv€r€d to Elam Construction, Inc., _3O_ days from abovo dat6, or shall oxpir6.
"To acc.pt th|r propoeal, pbarc rlgn back of
whlto copy rnd r.tum to Elam Conrtructlon,
lnc. Elrm Construc-tlon, Inc. .hrll not b.
bound h.r.ln to ax.culo a conlrrcl untaai th.
owncr provldo. r.tlstlctory cvldoncr ol ad-
.quat tlnenclng.
Bespectfully submitted
ELAM CONSTRUCTION. INC.
,, A.FQ 4-",
?!^
OJry,
O
\\
o,fnvbN
1.
qq\wc0 cAsH oEPg?rri9lMot
Legal D€scriPlion: Lot'" ' B9$-vizirit lrttt
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
TH|SAGREEMENT,made-andenteredintorhis'uqry0|ry1.y.199!,by
and among e..t una nrlJiiuil!]]il.-. (hereinatiei i.ii.a-tnt;Oevelopei'1, and the TOWN
6f vntl (iereinatter called the 'Town")'
Dalo of Expirdionl Dale oI bxPranon;.-
Address. 1339 l'les thaven
ffiii llutnuet: 01-0000-22026
Resi dence
WHEREAS,theDeve|operisobligatedtoprovidesecurity.orco||atera|suf|icientinthe
judgment of the Town to tl-f"-t""tonaO-te provisilns ioi comptetion of certain improvements
set forlh below; and
WHEREAS,theDeve|operwishestoprovideco||atera|toguaranteeperformanceof
this Agreement, incruoin!-co]irlr.rion of tne'aOovereferenced improvements by means of the
following:
Deve|operagreestoestablishacashdepositwiththeTownofVai|inadol|aramounl
of $-:.osz.so- (25% otthe total cost Siinl worr snown below) to provide security
for the following'
WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condltion of approvttgllP.I]1
plans, dated 6/2s is *, *i.h"t to enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement; and
IMPROVEMENT.
LandscaPing and drivewaY Pavi ng'
/
'S
a-+ l,li1b T On't -
?
and material #.;'i*iffi #;;;Jffi pi't'"ttiTp'?I"a1I'.:1.3:::P,':
fu,f and material necessary to petrorrrr
'1rr'.r
wr'H'er\';il6fi
a gooO'worfmanlike manner, all
' i'iy- i , tnb , " , Jl.e-?:"*fi*',:1" en ..,rens and soecirications riled in the 'Jtrlt ' i t'nu
"'
' - ' I rrri 'JeYerr','"v' s"e" --ii'liiprlnt arid specifications filed in the
ffiffints as listeg above, in accordancel]1. .*^ T^rrrn nr vail and to do allwork improvements as llsleq auuvv' rI I crvv.,' \'c'' '\'v "' .''i,ln' io*n of V'ail, and to do all work
oiiic" of the Community Development Departme' ,.- ^-^.^,,^r.,i,r,.r.i#id:;i"i;";;i;';;;;;d'd toino in compriance with the forrowins:
w,{r;q\54r:
7 a-Y\/'J'c6
NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationofthetollowingmutualcovenantsand
rgr..t;ta, ine Developer and the Town agree as follows:
rhe Developer asrees, at lts sole tq:land 9lllt:t:ltjYtll?l,3ll equipment
a. Such other designs, drawings' maps' specifications' :f!l*' and other matter
submittedbytheDevelopertobe;;ffi*dbyanyofthe'above-referenced
gou"rn]n",it'"t'entilies. Rtt saio *;[;;i;;bone und-er the inspection of, and
to the satislaction of, the Town e"gil"t1 the Town Buildinp official' or other
official trom the Town of Vall, ". "t"".-,#
dV-.F:;f O"tticis or service districts'
astheirrespectiveinrerest'"v"pp."',"n6sharrnotbedeemedcomp|eteunti|
approved"ioi|J'pt.o"sco'i''pr..['obythe.Town.ofVai|Commun|ty
oeuetopmlni otpahm"nt and Publlc Works Department'
2.Tosecureandguaranteeperformanceo|itsob|igationsassetforthherein,the
Developer agrees to provide slcurity and collateral as follows:
Page 1 of 3
Acashdepositaccountintheamount.of.$9,062'50 -tobehetdbytheTown'as escrow agent, sr,aiiJiovid" ii" ,"""rit'.trir the ''rntovemdts set lorth above il there rs
l-J"i"rri-rnaer the Agreement by Developer'
3.TheDeve|opermayatanytimes.ubstitutelheco||atera|originallysetforth
above tor another forr oi[oifrtoliaccdptaUte to-fi"]o*n to guarantee the faithful
compteilon of lhose hJ;#;;6i.6rrin ro.trrin.no the p6rformance of the terms ol thls
Asreement. su.n acc"pil."ii"iv *,I'ii". .r .riJiii.irit-r iirrltL,"r shar be at rhe Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not' nor shall any oflicer or employee thereof' be liable or
responsible ror any "*il;;'i;'oii"t"g" h-"#ffis"9;oJtuitingrorhe work specified in
this Agreement prior to t'i'r"'lorpr"tion ano accef,i"ii"ir the same' nor shall the Town' nor
anv officer or emplovee il#i,"b; liable for 3tfiilffi 3; nt"o91y'11ured bv reason or the
naiure of said work, Ort iiifr ,i:,1-ti"5itities ,n"il lna "t" nereUy assumed bv the Developer'
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnity and'hold l'111t-t-t
the Town' and any of lts
officers, agents and employees against ry 9::&'tlalms'
damages"or llabllltles to whlch the
Town or any of its officers, agenrs br emptoyeei?ril;;H; su5iect to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, Oamage;;rlirOifiti.. (or icfions in'iltp"ti ttttttofi mat arise out of or are
based upon anv perrormance.bv tt* DtYg]:f;#;ilJ;;' tno mb Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or.other,gtOglltt it"tonaOty incuneO by the Town in
connecrion with invesilgating or detend,.lg 1iI tu.if;tJrlit, d1T?g:' liabilitv or action'
This indemnity provisioln-siiiriu" in adctition to
"nv'orno
riabitity which the Developer may
have.
s. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply.to the Town and the Town
shal authoriz" ro,' p"rt',liilr"ir. or tne cottaterai'6.;ii;a *iin-me.to*n tor each category
of improvement at such-iime as such improve#niili...nttt'aed,in compliance with all
otans and specifications a. ieieren.eO n.*rniJi'"nO accepteO by the Town' Under no
condnion will the "rou.i"r',i"'coiraterar
tnat ir tJti ntidbt reduced below the amount
;;;;;."ty to complete such improvements'
6.1|theTowndeterminesthatanyoftheimprovements'contemplatedhereinare
not constructeo in coripiian." *itn the plans..ini tp""it"["iiont set.forth heiein by the date set
forth in paragraph z, ,n!"io*"'r"v, oui ,n"tt ;; ila"it"d.to,.withdraw from the cash
deposit such functs "" *"y be necessary t. .Jli'p[i" in-" untinitna improvements' The
Town sharr rerease .,;Jt il.d"';;;;iriJrritr"n"[q""ti tr the starf of the communitv
Devetopment orp"nrini-.i.ring tn"t th. itd;til;;it-n"ut noitten completed as required
by rhe agreemenr. Th;';o;''.i"ir not ,"qrir""tr,i'i-ontu*nt" of the devetoper prior to the
release or rhe tunds, ;;r';ri;ll in, to*n u. ttqrittJ-to ":flfil9:Pjndentlv
that the
improvements n"u, nJbr.n completed .r "iui"o
by this'Agreement, but shall release sucn
funds solely upon the request of the Community Development Department'
|fthecostsotcomp|etingtheworkexceedtheamounto|thedeoosil,theexcess'
together with interest ai tn eru"
-percent p.t .ffi;,';"if ot "
lien against the property and
may be collected ov .iriirrii"i*av u" certiil;'i; ittt i*"tut"t ot Eaole countv to be
coilected in the same manner as derinquent ;;;j;;l;;Ls. tevieo aiainst such property' lf
th€ permir holder fairs o;;;f*;; ro corirpteteii;;ililp "tO
tanOscaFing' as defined in lhis
chapter, such faiture'oiiir.irJrn"rr Ue ionsiieieJ "
uiof"tion of the Zoning Code'
T.TheDeve|operwarrants.al|.workandmaterial|oraperiodofoneyearafter
acceptance ot arr wor"r ieiSnlo to in tnis ngr;er;ent uy m" Town pursuant to section
17.16.2s0 if such work is tocated on Town "iv;Iilitttv or within Town of Vail right-of'way'
E.Thepart|esheretomutua||yagroethatthisAgreementmavbeamended|rom
time to rime, provioel'iiirt ,u.t, "t.not'.ntl'[!
ffitititg ind executedby atl parties hereto'
Dated the day and year first above written'
Page 2 of 3
srArE OF COLORADO ]rr.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregolng DeveloPer
?t dai;f dbviu-ti 't
$drtd 9i28191
Wtness mY hand and offlclalseal'
My commisslon exPlres: +li n ltt
srArE OF COLORADO ))...
COUNTYOFEAGLE )
??ry.aay ot
p, rhelorPlle DeveloPei gffy"tl2 r lmprov
1/ilsov
Page 3 ol 3
was acknowledged belore me ttls
i@PMENT
DflI
LETTER OF CREDIT FORMAT
Legal Description: Lot23 Block-
Subdivision G I ei r.ycf,Jing
-AddressL339-.blestba:zeali-rc le
Dare or Expirario^, _______1 / / I 4 b
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AG REEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 14 day of Februarv. 19-9fby
and among Beck & associates (hereinafter called the 'Developer"), and the TOWN
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the "Town") dfld wesr st-r (herelnafter called the "BanK').
WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition of approvat rit tne Hovey Residence
plans, dated 6/29 ,19_llwishes lo enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement;and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral suflicient in the
judgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion ol certain lmprovements
set forth below: and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
following:
Developer agfees to egi ri lisir a letter of credit with a Bank in Eagle County in a dollar
amount of $ 3'm-9ltZS6t, of the total cost of the work shown below) to provide
security for the following:
IMPROVEMENT
Roof modification per T.O.V. approved design.
{it, n'oR
Dyy'
w
NOW, THEREFORE, in conslderation of the lollowing mutual covenanls and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expensesr to furnish all equipment
end material necessary to perform and complete all improvemdnts, on or before
improvemenls as listed abovg, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the Community Development Dspartment, the Town of Vail, and to do all work
incidental thereto according to and in comptiance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, skelches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmenlal entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Oflicial, or other
official from the Town of Vail, as aflecled by snccial distriels nr sanrica districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Development Department and Public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee performance of its obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
Page 1 of 3
ttk 7:s
lrrevocable letter ol credit # -33:.L- in the amount of $j-js0-no- with
rrrpqr' srer R.ank (name of bank in Eagle Gounty) as lhe security for the
improvements set lorth above if there is a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth
above for anolher form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarante6 the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and the performance of the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town ol altematlve collateral shall be at lhe Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, 4or shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss oridamage happening or occuning to the work specified in
this Agreement prior to the completibn and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor
any oflicer or employee thereof, be llable for any persons or property injured by reason of the
nature ol said work, but all of said lldblllties shalland are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents o1 employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the;Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or defgnding any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in hddition to any other liabllity which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall aulhorize for partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category
of improvement at such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount of the collateral that is being held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements
contemplated hereunder are not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications
set forth in this Agreement on or before the date set torth in Paragraph 2, the Town may, but
shall not be required to, redeem the letter ol credit as necessary to complete the unfinished
improvements. The Bank shall release such funds upon written requ€st trom the Town stating
that the improvements have not been completed as required by this agreement. The Bank
shall not require the concurrence of the developer prior to release of the lunds to the Town
nor shall the Bank be required to verify independently that such improvements have not been
completed as requlred by thls agreement, but shall release such fundg solely upon the Town's
written request.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest al twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be
collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf
the permit holder fails or refuses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning code.
7, The Developer warranls all work and material for a period ol one year after
acceptance of all work refeJred to in this Agreement by the Town if such work is located on
Town of Vail property or within Town of Vail right-of-way pursuant to Section 17.16.250.
8. The parties hereto mutuallv agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to time, provided that such amendments be In writlng and executed by allparties hereto.
Dated the day and year first above wrltten.
Page 2 of 3
l"
ta.
lr t*,,1,17,'Y?aTf4't'fl,Yfffii MtrX"-*'"Y@Y'r'e me this {l dav or
STATEOFCOLORADO )
)$.
COUNTYOFEAGLE )
STATE OF COLOBADO
COUNry OF EAGLE
Witness my hand and ofiicial seal.
My commission expires:
. Wtness my hand and officlal seal.
/\ lt.4 My commissbn erctuas: f,fo!fu!
T
BANK
19- by
The foregolng Developer lmprovement Agreement wae acknowledqod before me thle _ _ day of
Witness my hand and offblal seal.
My commission elghes:
Lbnrd e2tf,,.
OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.'
COUNTY OF EAGLE )tJtJUN I Y LrF EAIILE ,
a" n
,4ff o,
tn"
}r.'Elf,.lul?u"".n onr".'n.n,:ar acknowledsBd bcfore me tH&-dav ot
Notary Public
PqrSol3
IE
ROOF tDitusrxtt|lla
BOVET IEAIDEIfCE F.bn[ry 13, 1996
Demolltl.on - 8/hrs at $5O.0O
Re-Fr@, sheath - 8/hrs et $5O.O0
chlnney Bulld and Attach - 6lhtt at S5O.OO
R.-Roof end llerhlng - Ac€ RoofLng
gtucco rnd IrIn - Cior€ Range l{a3onry
l,llrccl hncou. Hat.rlala
lillgcelleneous Labor - 1O/hrs at S5O.OO
AO!,f,l. I!-BUIITD
s 4oo.0o
s 400.oo
s 3oo.oo
s soo.oo
s 3oo.o0
$ 2OO.OO
s 500.oo
92,600. OO
t
IRREVOCABTJE IJETTER OF CREDIT #221
Effective Date: February 14, 1995
Expiration Date: ilune 29, 1995
Town Of Vail Pa . narra l.\n6r rrnDrgvement Agreement
Gentlemen:
We hereby open our Irevocable Letter of Credit in your favor,available to you by drafts at sight. drawn on the WestStar Bank for
any sum or sums not exceeding in total the sum of THREE TIIOUSAND
TWO HITIIDRED FIFTY DOIJLARS AI\ID NO/CEIITS ($3,250.00) for the account
of BECK AND ASSOCIATES.
Each draft must bear upon its face the cl-ause, rrDrawn under Letter
of Credit No. 221- dated February 14,1,996 of WestStar Bank, Avon,
Colorado. I'
The amount of each draft, which is negotiated pursuant to this
credit, together wi-th the date of negotiation, must be endorsed on
the reverse side of the l-retEer of Credit.
We hereby agree that drafts drawn under this Letter of Credit and
in compliance with its terms, sha1l be promptly honored if
presented to Weststar Bank on or before February 14, 1-996.
This Letter of Credit shall expire on .tune 29, 1996.
Weststar Bank represents and warrants Lo the Town of VaiI, that it
has the fuII authority and power to issue this Letter of Credit in
the total amount and for the period of Lime stated herein; said
authority being pursuant to the laws of the United States, or to
the State or territory which governs the establishment and
regulation of Weststar Bank, and the Weststar Bank's Charter, by-
Iaws and other applicable rules and regulations adopted pursuant
thereto. Should it be necessary for the Board OF County
Commissioners, Eagle County, to file suit in an effort to enforce
this lrrevocable L.,etter of Credit, Weststar Bank hereby waives afl
venue rights and submits to the jurisdiction of the District Court
in and for the County of Eag1e, State of Coforado.
t.'
Beck and Associates Letter of Credit #221
Paqe Two
AII drafts hereunder must be drawn on or before June 29 . L996.
-Q'i nccra'l rr
Weststar BANK
A UrXL
Dan E. Godec \--
Executive Vice President
I OATE DFI|LLEO: August 3, 1994
| ' ELEvATToN:
I*"\f
'',"t(,,,,rru*'!"'"FMArER'|aL
+
Spllt spoon sanple
BORING NO.
SUMMARY OF TEST BORINGS
Proposed Resldence Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdlvlsion
Town of Vall, Eagle County, Colorado Prepared for: Nancy and Charlle Hovey
PFoJEcr NO.r gU621G
F IGUA E NO.: 1
.rtr'
BORING NO.
I
oota oRILL€o: Augusr 3, 1994
|
.'-.uo.o",
I /r,'.**,I
r:l: fiffi lll
,,i I ll'""""f''rrng lx;"ff:i:*:*'
I
I tt| l l t
O California thln tube sanple
Split spoon sanple
SUMMARY OF TEST BORINGS
Proposed Resldence
LoE 23, clen Lyon Subdlvislon
Town of Vall, Eagle County, Colorado Prepared for: Nancy and Charlie Hovey
PAOJECT NO.: g46Z7C
FIGUA€ NO.: 2
I
J
UJ 3 t/,
I
z
9
o f o tn z o ()
u.r t.0 LoAo txsFl t0 too
SAMPLE OF Cl8yey-grsvelly SAtfD , NAT. VOTSTURE CONTENT 4J q6
7oswELL,/coNsoL-sAMPLEFLoooEoAT-L.]q-xsFNATDRYoENs|TYL25,gPcF
o/o SWELL,/CONSOL.
SAMPLE OF
s
J J
uJ
=v,
I
z o
F
o
J o
an z o (J
SAMPLE FLOOOEO AT-KSF
NAT. MOTSTURE CONTENT_%
NAT, ORY DENSITY PCF
SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
?roposed Residence
LoE 23, clen Lyon Subdlvlslon forn of-Vall, Eagle County, Colorado frepared for: Nancy and Charlie Hovey
rnoJtct ro 94627C
. rcUB E NO 3
qr
FOUNDATION
WALL -
DETAIL OF PERIPHERAL
FOR FOOTING TYPE
I?E'PU' #RE.?", 9At$'' "IMPERVIOUS FILL. SLOPE
AWAY FROM BUILDING.
GEOTEXTILE ( MIRAFI I4ON OR
EOUIVILANT )
MTNUMUM oF 6" oF 3/4 INCH. GRAVEL
SUMP PUMP OR DAYLIGHTED.
DRAIN SYSTEM
FOUNDATION
Figure
ProJect No. 94627G
Proposed Resldence
I.ft 23' Glen LYon Subdlvislon
fown of Vall, Eagle County, Colorado
?rePared for: Nancy and Charlie Hovey
4'' DIAMETER PERFORATEO BIGID .,
FLP"'%bof iB E.#!H nf.XY' 8f.'6% o'o,t
Oo*of Vell
OFFICE COPV
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
NAME:HOVEY RESIDENCE Date: 'fULY 14, 1995
Occupancy: R3,Ml
Type of ConsL: V-N
Departrnent of Community Development
Town of VaiT
75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 8t657 (303) 479 -2L38
Plan review based on the 1-991 Uniform Buildinq Code
AddresS: 1339 WESTHAVEN CR Contractor: BECK
ArchiLecT: PEEL
Engineer: NEUJAHR
Plans ExamineT: CHUCK FELDMANN
Sloped gl-azing (skylighLs) sha11 be Lempered over laminate glazing as per UBC 3402. Plastic glazing shall be as per UBC 5207. A curb may be required
depending upon glazing material, slope of roof, or flashing used.
AII elecLrical work is to be complete to the requirements of the latest National Electrical Code,aII Town of Vail Ordinances, and Holy Cross
Requirements.
This project vri1l require a siEe improvement survey.This survey sha11 be submit,Eed and staff approved prior to a reguest for a frame inspection. Under no
sircumst,ances will a frame inspect,ion be done without an approved site improvement survey.
There shall be only one kitchen designated per dwelling unit a1l-owed by the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. A11 other such labeled areas are noL approved and sha11 not be rough-in const.ructed as
such.
All new construction within the Town of vail will be required t,o have an initial inspection by TOv public
works Dept. to approve site drainage and culvert installation. This approval must be complete prior to any inspection by the Building Department.
{p *,,,",,,,,*,r
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
D e p arnne nt of C ommunity Deve lopme nt
This project is rest.ricted from the burning of wood in f ireplaces. Unf ess the loL is a resE.rict.ed 1ot in size, three gas logs fireplaces and three gas
appliances are permitted per unit allowed. Gas log
chimneys enclosures sha1l be one hr. protected.
In bathrooms with a tub or shower and in laundry
rooms a mechanical ventilation system connected directly to the ouLside shall be provided. Bathrms
which contain only a water closeE or 1av. may be ventilated wj-th a recirculating fan. UBC 1205(c) .
Domest.ic clothes dryer exhaust ducts shal1 be insLalled as per llMC 1-104 and 1903. Flexible duct
connect.ors may not exceed 6' in length and shall not be concealed within construction. Duct,s shall terminate outside the building and not exceed 14'length.
No domestic dishwashing machine shall be directly
connected Lo a drainage system without the use of an
approved dishwasher air-gap fitting. UpC 608.
Cross connecti.on control devices shall be i-nstalled to protecL pollution of potable water supply by use of approved backflow prevention devices. UpC 1003.
Plumbing fixLures with mechanical apparatus shall be supplied with an access panel for inspecti.on and repair of equipment. UpC 904.
Domestic ranges shaLl have a vertical clearance
above the cooking surface of not less than 30', to unprotected combusLible material . UMC 1901.
Approved gas logs may be insLalled in solid-fuel burning fireplaces provided the inst.allation is according to the listing instructions, any damper shall be removed or permanently blocked, and a safety shutoff valve is provided. UMC 803.
10
TL
'ta LZ
13
{p *""'"""o '*"*
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Department of Community Deve lopment
Gas fireplace appliances are required Lo be insLalled as per listing installaEion instructions wiLh a "B,, vent. only. CombusLion air must be supplied from the outside for all new construction in t.he Town of vai1.
Supply a mechanical drawing j-ndicating desiqn of system, size (BTU and volume) of eguipment, vent location and Lermination. and combustion air to be supplied prior to any installation.
Due to Colorado State Statutes, all sink fauceLts
and shower heads are required to utilize flow restriction devices. Also, the maximum wat.er closet flush usage is limited to a maximum of 3.5 gallons per flush.
AL eaves and valleys an adequate underlayment shall be provided to protect a structure from ice buildup
and water damage. Two layers of felt solid mopped to sheat.hing and between layers or a conmercial water * ice shield may be used as per Table 328L.
In addition to a minimum reinforcement, noE less than two #5 bars shall be provided around all window
and door openings. Such bars shall be extended
beyond the corners of the openings not less than
24 " . uBc 2614 (d\'7 .
Because of this project's location, the foundation is required to be dampproofed to prevent damage to areas below finished grade. UBC 1707(d) .
The structure is required to be anchored to the foundatai-on with 1/2 inctl anchor bo1ts. The bolts must be int.o the concrete or masonry 7 inches and spaced a maximum of 6 f eet. apart. See code for ad.d.itional requirements. - - Sec . 2907 . (f ')
.lA
15
16
't7
1a
L9
ZU
{P *'"""u"*"*
l-o
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE
MECHANICAL PERMIT PCTMiI TOWN OFVAIL
11I
It.lt.
ALL TIMES
M9 5-012 5
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Job Address...:
Location.. .. ..:
Parcel No.....:
Project Number:
Department of Community Development
1339 GREENHILL CT
2LO3-124-03-009
PRJ9 5-013 0
Status...:Applied..:
Issued. . . :
Expires. . :
ISSUED
08/22/tee5
o8 /24 /tee5
02/20 /ree6
Fi replacr Infornation: Restri cted:#0f Gas Appliances:
ttcffinhffiffi*tit$*#******lrt*ffi**trj*rnki FEE SUl,lttARy
llechani ca [---) 500,00
Ptan Check---) 125.00
Restuarant Ptan Review-->
Invest i 9at ion>
Ui Lt cal.l.---->
TOTAL FEES-----
APPLICANT BECK & ASSOCIATES, rNC
P O BOX 4030, VAIL CO
coNTRAcToR BECK & ASSOCIATES, rNC
P O BOX 4030, VAIL CO OITINER HOVEY CHARLIE
CONTRACTOR GUARANTEED PLUMBING &
P O BOX 2156t VArL CO
Description:
MECHANICAL SFR
ORB F
.00
3.00
62E.00 TotaL Pernit Fee------->
Payments-------
81658
81658
HEATING
81658
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Valuation:
#0f Gas Logs:
3039491800
3039491800
s08-526-7 464
3039494320
25,000.00
fof t,ood/Pa L tet:
.00 Total Calcutated Fees--->
.00 Additionat Fees--------->
628.00
.00
628.00
*r***fiffi**n****s***rorr.ffi*ffiffiffi*t***ffiffi****************--*-lllffllll;*;;;;i***-*---riff**
Ite.r.n: .051QO_EIIILDING DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division:O8/22/I99s DAN action: EFpn
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. COMBUSTIBLE AIR IS REQUIRED PER SEC.6O7 OF THE 1991 TJMC.2. AqgEgS TO HEATING EQUIPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH SEC.5O5 AND 703 0F THE 1991 lrMC;3. INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS AND TO APPENDIX CHAPTER 21 OF THE ].991 T'MC.4. GAS APPLIANCES SHALL SHALL BE VENTED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 9 TO THE 1991 UMC AND SHALL TERMINATE AS SPECIFIED TN SEC.9O6 oF THE 1991 nMC 5. BOILERS SHALT BE MOUNTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONgTBUCTION UNLESS L]STED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBLE FLOORING.q. FIELD INSPEqTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.7. pEBMrT, pLANg AND CODE ANALYSTS-MUSf-6b- pOsrrD-iN-ltEtnal,lreEr,
ROOM PRIOR TO AN INSPECTION REQUEST.
********************************************************************************
DECLARATIONS
I. hercby .acknovledgc that I have read,th'is apptication, fiLted out in ful,l, the infornation required, conpt.tcd an accuratr ptot
Ptan, and statc that atl the infornation provided as required is correct. I agrle to corapty riith the infornation and ptot il,an,to comp [y uith 8tt Toun ordinrnces and statc tavs, and to buitd this structure according totha Tovnts ron,ing and subdivisibn
{S u"ro"or*"r
, uniforh BuiLding codc and other ordinances of the Toun sppticabte thereto.
BE I.IADE TI.IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN AOV
SIGTilOIIry
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I i 8/479-2 I 39
FAX 970-479-2452
FOR HITISELF AND OIINER
0R AT oUR orFICE FRoll 8:q) An 5:00 Pn
De partment of Community Deve lopment
{j ^t"t"uo "u"^
o
***************************************************!r************
TOWN OF VAfL, COLORADO Statemnt ****************************************************************
Statemnt Number: REC-0057 Anount: 628.00 08/24/95 L6:.46
Payment Method! CK Notation: CK11491 Init: lO{C
Permit No: M95-0125 Type: B-MECH MECITANICAIT PERMIT
Parcel No: 2103-124-03-009
Site Addres6: 1339 GREENHIIJIJ CT
rhis payrnenr 628. oo *"..T'lii Xff:; 333:33
Balance: .00 ****************************************************************
Account Code Description Anount
01 OOOO 4T3I2 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 5OO.OO
01 0000 4L332 PLAN CHECK FEES 125.00
01 OOOO 41336 I{ILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.OO
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE
PLTJMBING PERMIT PCTTNit
AT ALL TIMES
P9 5-0121
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8/479-2 I 3 9
FAX 970-479-2452
D ep artment of C ommunity Deve lopment
Job Address Location...
Parcel No..Project No.
1339 GREENHILL CT
2L03-124-03-009
PRJ95-0130
Status...: ISSUED App1ied..: 08/22/L995 Issued...: 08/24/L995
Expiree. . : 02/20/L996
Phone: 3039491800
Phone: 3039491800
Phonez 508-526-7464
Phonez 3Q39494320
75r.m
.@
accurate ptot
and ptot ptan,
APPLTCANT BECK & ASSOCIATES, rNC
P O BOX 4030, VAIL CO 81658
CoN?RACTOR BECK & ASSOCTATES, rNC
P O BOX 4030, VArL CO 81658 OWNER HOVEY CHARLIE
CONTRACTOR GUARANTEED PLUMBING & HEATING
P O BOX 2L56, VAIL CO 81658
Description: PLUMBING SFR Valuation:40, 000 .00
**#*ffiffirftt*****Jrt*J('r|tffi#ffi*t FEE SUltl,lARY r.tr**ffi('#r|*ffit*ffi*
P tumbi ng----->
Ptan Check---)
Invest igat ion>l'litl cat L---->
600.00
150.00
.00
3.00
Restuarant Pl,an Revi ew-->
TOTAL FEES_----
.0O Totat Catcutatcd Fces-->
753.00 AdditionaL F.cs--------->
Total Pertrit f ce-------> 753.00
Payments-------753.00
BALAI'ICE DUE----
ffi **ffnt*ffrffi.*titffi ,rff *ffi*Hffi ffi**ffi ffi **ffi **ir**#*#Jrlnt*ffi ffi ffi*#rrtirffi ffi f*
Item: .05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/22/7995 DAN Action: APPR
DCDT: BUILDING Division:
ff *ffi<tffiiJrffi ffi ffi ffi *##ffi ffi *ffi ffi ffi
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
***'ffi**ff*r.*ffi***#r#*ffi*ffi*t#*:tlr*ffi*JrJn*rr********#t***ffi:tffi**Htffirt#rrt*i**+ffi#t**t*
DECLARA?IONS
I hcreby acknowtedge that I have read this apptication, f il,l,ed out in ful,l, the information required, conpteted an
ptan, and stat! that alt the information provided as requi red is correct. I agree to compty Hith the infornation to conpty vith atl Tovn ordinances and statc [aus, and to buitd this structure according to the Toyn's zoning rvlsron
codes, dcsign review approved, uniform Buitding Code and other ordinances of the Toyn appticabl
REOUESTS FOfi INSPECIIOIIS SHALL EE IIAOE TI.'ENTY-FOUR IOTJRS II.I AOVANCE BY
{g*tn"uoruo
o
*****; *****************************************************:t****
TOWN OF VArr-,, COLORADO Statemnt
****************************************************************
7s3.00 08/24/95 L6252 rnit: MMC
Statemnt Number: REC-0057 Amount:
Payment Method: CK Notation: CK11491
Permit No:
Parcel No:site Addre6s:
This Payment
Account Code
01 0000 41311
01 0000 4L332
01 0000 41336
Total Fees:
753.00 Total ALL Pmts:
Balance:
P95-0121 Type: B-PrilB PLIJMBTNG PERMTT
2t03-L24-03-009
1339 GREENHILL CT
753.00
753.00
.00
****************************************************************
Description Anount
PLWBING PERMIT FEES 600. OO
PLAN CHECK FEES 15O. OO
WILL CALI INSPECTION FEE 3. OO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM a
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAY 9, 1994
WHEN A "PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'tS REOUIRED
ollowing questionnaire regarding the need for a "Public Way permit":
NO YES
x 1) ls this a new residence?
2l ls demolition work being performed
that requires the use of the right
of way, easements or public property?
3) ls any utility work needed?
4) ls the driveway being repaved?
5) ls different acress needed lo site
other than existing driveway?
6) ls any drainage work being done
affecting the right of way, easemenls,
or public property?
7) ls a'Revocable Right CI Way permit"
required?
8) A. ls the right of way, easements or
public property to be used for staging,
paking or fencing?
B. lf no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or lencing plan required by Community
Development?
!!Vou_ alswered yes to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permit" must be obtained.
'Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's ofiice or at
Cgr.nmulity Development. lf you have any questions please call Charlie Davis, the Town ol Vail Construction Inspector, at 479-p15f,. '
I have read and answ estions.
X
,f,,
Job Name Conlracto/s Signature Date
75 south lront.ge rord
yail. colorado 81657
(3031 479-2L.38 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&TECT:
offlce of comrnunlty devclopmcnt
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED T{ITH TIIE TOIVN OF VArL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT
lifARcH 15, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKTNG & MATERTAL STORAGE
rn sunmary, ordinance No. 5 states that it is unrawfur for any person to litter, track or deposit ""V =oif,-rJ"i., sand, debris or nateriar, incruding trash bunpsters, portable toilets and worknen vehicles.upon any streerl "ie;;uik;-;ii;y or public place or any portiin ttr"i""il--irre rrgtrt-of-way on arr Town of Vail streets and_.Ig"g" is ipproiimatety 5 ft. off pavenent.This ordinance wilr- be =ttiElrv--enforced by the Town of vai].Public works Deoartment. --p"i=lnl found vi;laiin; this ordinance wilr be siven a 24 hour ""iii"i"i"ti""-ti-;;;;:t="id urareriar.In the event the person so notified.does not compl.y with the notice within the-24 hour.tir"-=p""ified, the puLlic l{orks Department wirl remove said nateii.t _"t the expense of person notified' The provi=i"n=-ot-'[rri] orainance sharr not be applicable to cinstruction, ,.irri.rr.rrce or repair projects of any street or arley or any uaiilai;;--i; G"';i;;i-"_r.y.
To review ordinance No. e in full, please stop by the Town of ::li"::ii3i"3,";f,if*:*"::""uiii" a copv. rirani vou ror your
(i.e. contractor, owner)
75 3outh trontrgc road
r!il, colorudo 81657
(303) 479-2L38 ot 479-2L39 ottlcc of communlty devclopmctrl
BUILDING PERI.|IT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this peryit lequires a Torvn of Vai.l Fire Departnent Approval,Engineer'.s (pub'ti. f9*:l review una app"ouut,.i iir"iini-b"p."t .nt review or Health Department review, anl'"_review by the Buirding Department, the estinated time tor'a iotat ".uitn-fov ia[!'as tong as three weeks.
Al'l cormerc'ial ("rarge or smail ) and ail mu'lti-famiry permits wil r have to follow the ibove menti6nea-m.iirr* requirements. Res.idential and.small projects shou]d take a teiitr-amouni of time. However, if residential or smailer.projects irpiii the various above mentioned departments with reoard to-necessiiy-""ui"n, these projects may a'l so take the three-week period.
Every attempt will be pg. fV this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible. - vv b^rev'e\- e'
l:-jl" undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time T rame -
Corrnuni ty Devel opment Department.
NOTE:
o
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit #: E95-0170
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
E [cctri ca [--->
DRB Fee --->
Invcstigation>
Ui l. L Ca L l.---->
TOTAL FEES--->
Department of Community Development
*tff(*ffi*ir*ffi*ff*ffr|H*'l*****rr****ffii'tl*******rr** FEE SUltllARY *tff*********rt****t***tt****rf*rrrffiffir:hifin**U*iri*
APPLICANT BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC
P O BOX 4030, VArL CO 81658
coNTRAcToR BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC
P O BOX 4030, VArL CO 81658 OWNER HOVEY CHARLIE
CONTRACTOR WHITE RIVER ELECTRIC
P O BOX 1118, AVON CO 8L620
Description: TEMPORARY POWER NEW SFR
Status...: ISSUED Applied..: 08/25/t995 rssued...: 08/28/t995 Expires..: 02/24/t996
Phone: 3039491800
Phone: 3039491800
Phonez 508-526-7464
Phone: 3039491403
250 .00 Valuation:
45 .00
45 .00
Payments-------
BALANCE DUE_--.00
Job Address Location...
Parcel No..
Project, No.
42.00
.00
3.00
45.00
1339 GREENHILL CT
2L03-724-03-009
PRJ95- 013 0
Totat Catcutated Fees--->
Additional, F"es------->
TotaI Permit Fee------>
ffiffi**ffiffirHroffi**tt**r*t*t ttffitt***tr**ffiff(ft**r****ffff*ffi.*rtt Jrtlrffit****ff*d**************ffi*
Dept: BUTLDING Divisj-on:
****ff****#*ffittt*rrr*t ffiffilrJ(****r*ffi#rtrfftr**trr*********************************i****ffffi*fi******i**H**
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
lr,t**rtft*ffi**ffir*ftlH(******ffi*ti******ffi#****t***********ff******ff*ffitHr*ff.rtrt**rHffi*ffi***fiffi#****t*ffi**
DECI,ARA?IONS
t hercby acknovtedge that I hav! rlad this appl.ication, til,ted out in fult the information required, conpleted an accuratc ptot
ptan, aM state that att the information provided as requifed is correct. I agree to compty Hith the infornration and pl.ot pLan,to compty lrith att Tovn ord'insnces and statr [avs, and to buiLd this structune according to the To]rn's zoning and subdivis.ion
codes, design revieH approved/ Unitorn Buitding code and other ordinances of th! Tovn appl,icabt. thercto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I,IADE T}IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY
rLe-m: .06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT O8/25/L995 DAN Action: AppR
{p**uo
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL,'COLORADO Statemnt ****************************************************************
statemnt Number: REc-0058 Anountz 45.0o 08/28/95 11245
Palrment Method: CHECK Notation. *L50O? fnit: LRD
Pernit No: 895-0170 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Parce1 No: 2LO3-L24-03-009 Site Address: 1339 GREENHILL CT Total Fees:45.00 Tota1 ALL Pmts:Balance: .00
***!t**********************************************!t*!t***********
45.00
4s. 00 This Payment
Account Code
01 0000 41313
01 0000 41336
Description
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
Arnount
42.00
3 .00
C* oF vArL coNsrRucrroNt PERI'IIT ll Agslat.kt
. . PERMIT APPLICATTON rORM DArE:_AlL:{
, APPLTCATToN MusT BE FTLLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAy NOT BE ACCEPTED
r****************************** PERIIrT TNFORMATION *****************************rl [ ]-Building [ ]-Plumbing [ )C-Electrica]. [ ]-Mechanicat I J-other
Owners Name:
Architect:
Address:
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
Plunbing Cont,ractor:
Address:
[qi:o/ zo
Mechanical
Address:
Contractor:
********************************FOR
BUTLDING PERMIT FEE:
PLUMBING PERMTT FEE:
MEC}TANICAL PERMIT TEE:
ELECTRICAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
Ph.
BUTLDTNG:
STGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
Job Nane: llt,r.J Qos,'J.^< - Job Addressz i -\3cJ'z<-t-.t-A,,r,.- c-,'n.l o
Legal DescriptJ-on:Lolll Block rilinS suBprvrsroN:6"/.
Address P tt A,,^ lu zt:,, l/.' I p]n. crtt.t - t htr -\
Address:
General Description:
work class: [ ]-New [ ]-Alteration [ ]-Additionat [ ]-Repalr [ ]-other
Nunber of Dwelling Units;Nurnber of Accommodation Units:
^ rynber and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances_ cas LogE_ wood/pellet_v
,T********************************* VALUATTONS *********************************
BUILDING:3 ELECTRICALz I ! T96.,OTHER: S
TOTAL: f
INFORI{ATION ***************************
Town of Vail Reg-. No.//7-n
Phone Nurnber: J17-tTV o
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
Town of VaiI
Phone Number:
Reg. NO.
Reg. NO.
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Nurnber:
oFFrcE usE *******************************
BUTLDTNG PI.AN CHECK FEE:
PLWBING PISN CHECK FE8:
MECHANICAL PIAN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
CLEAN.UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAIJ PERMIT
VALUATION
CLEAN I'P DEPOSIT REFIIND TO:
fl
DE'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAY 9, 1994
WHEN A ''PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'IS REQUIRED
,1og 11"rr, /fo ,,-v Q. es, Jea. c e.
Please answer the following questionnaire regarding the need for a "Public Way Permit':
YES
V
rt/a
nt/o
^/ /A
r, /o
P/a
NO
1)
2)
ls this a new residence?
ls demolition work being performed
that requires the use of the right
of way, easements or public property?
3) ls any utility work needed?
4) ls the driveway being repaved?
5) ls different access needed to site
other than existing driveway?
6) ls any drainage work being done
affecting the right of way, easements,
or public property?
7) ls a "Revocable Righl Of Way Permit'
required?
8) A. ls the right of way, easemenls or
public property to be used for staging,
parking or fencing?
B. lf no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or fencing plan required by Community
N IA
e /*
N /A
Development?
lf you answered yes to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permit" must be obtained.
'Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's office or at
Community Development. ll you have any questions please call Charlie Davis, the Town
ol Vail Construclion Inspeclor, at 479-2158.
I have read and answered allthg above questions.
lJ,l r, u, Be:, cL,n--,r-.,- -Bt- S--.^-])
Job Name Contractor's Signatu
PUBLIC WAY PERMIT PROCE
How it relates to Building permit:
1)Fill out the our check list provided with a buildino permit aoolication.
lf yes was answered ro any of the above questions then a 'public way permit, is required. You can pick Lrp an application at either community Development,located at 75 s' Frontage Road or Public works, located at 13og vail Valley Drive.
Notice sign offs for utirity. companies. All ulilities must field verify (rocate)respective utilities priorto signing application. some utility companies ,,eqlire u[to a 48 hour notice to schedule a locate).
A construction tratficcontrol plan must be prepared on a separate sheet of paper.This plan wilr show locations of ail tratfic ionirol devices (signJ, cones, elc.) and the work zone, (area of construction, staging, etc.)
sketch of work b.eing performed must be submitted indicating dimensions (length,width & deprh of work), This may be drawn on the traric iontror plan oijl iite plan {or the job.
Submit completed application to the Public work's office for review. lf required,locates will be scheduled forthe Town of Vail Electricianr anolirig"tion crew. The locates are take place in the morning, but may require up to 4g hlurs to perform.
The Public work's construction Inspector will review the application and approve or disapprove the permit. you wiil be contacted as to the iiitr.l^o any cr,ingei rhat may be needed. Most permits are rereased within 4g nouisJ oeind receivio,but please allow up to one week to process.
As soon as permit is Frocessed, i copy will be faxed to community Deveropment ailowing the 'Buirding permit" to be reieased. please oo noi"onii.. the "public way Permit' with a "Buirding permit" to do work on " [roi""iiite'itserr.
Note:
'The above process is for work In a rlght-of-way only.
'Public Way permit's are valld onlv until November 15th.
*A new Pubtic Way permit ls requlred each year.
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
rli
75 3oulh lronlegc rord
Yril. colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138 ot 479-2L39 otflcr of communlty dcyclopmcnt
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&TECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURREMILYL REGISTERED WITH TI{E TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC I{ORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE
rn summary, ordinance No. 5 states that it is unlawfur for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, =o.f, sand, debris or naterial, including trash iunpsteri, pori,able toilets and workrnen vehicles. upon any street, siaewairl -;Ii;y or public p1?:" or any portion rheieof. rrre rignt_"i_;;;-;n arl_ Town of Vaj.l streets and.Iga.ds is approiinately 5 ft. off pavernent.This ordinance wirr be striblit -enrorcLa uy ttre-iown of vail Pubric works Deoartnent. pers6ns found viilatinq this ordinance will. be qiven a 24 bour writien--i"iil.-t"t;;;;;;'""id mareriar:rn the event the person so notified does not cornply with ttre notice within rhe 24 hour time-=p."riiJ,"ii.';"f,ii"
"orx=Department will remove said uratei:.ai it in"--""p.""e of person notified. The provisions or irris ordinance shaLL not be applicable to cinstruction, ,ui'i.r,u'ce or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities :." in.-rl9ii-"_ruy.
To review ordinance No. 6 in fuIl, please stop by the Tovrn of :1il^::-i]!gns ogpartment to obrain a copy. rnani< you for your cooperation on this natter.
Sead and acknowledged by:
Y 'F....-r-*-.e)> ,f,r..r'+
75 routh tron|lgc rold
v|ll, color.do 81657
(303) 479-2138 ot 479-2139 otflc. of communlty drvolopmcnl
BUILDING PERI{IT ISSUANCE TIME FRANE
If this peryit.lequi.res a Town of Vail Fire Departnent Approval,Engineer''s (.pubric f,rorks) reyiew and approvai,'i iliri,iinS-b.pu"t .nt
f:]:L:I.H.1l!h ?:?u"tment review, and'a,review by the auiiiins -"-
uepartment' the estimated time for a tota'l review iray tate as 16ng as three weeks.
ll].^.?y:l:ial (larse or sma'I1) and ail mu.lti-family permits will nave to t0ilow the above mentioned maximum requiremlnis. Residential and.small projects_shourd take a resser amount of time. However, if residential or sma'l ier projects impact the various above mentioned departments with resard to necessary review,-th;;; ;;;j;.li'ruy also take the three-week period. -
Every attempt wi'll be made by this department to expedite this pennit as soon as possible. -
I' the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame.
b z-+qe
Communi ty Devel opment Department.
36 377 4vZ3 P.63
cLrE.'{ r FGGL I u*-Xesr.dld;rE8-rtAT€, BI'
1,744s
(.t\ 3l+.f 'a'
A4a ea-t$
XEUI'AHN
tilD onr^lq lr|c '. @fuSulrrG
STBIJCTURAL
-EX6.EEES
(z- clr:e aDa\
lown of Vril
sFlcF coP
(s\ Izh-,l4"rlc.
tl+ u g=*tr
sAccr-e-
l'lC- t'o'
^ EalJ ,t/*las TOTAL P.6
sEa'29-1S 36 377 4573 P,@
er)
t €--d N
'5 t
fl.JG-11-1995
EI|I}N Nffiil,IT %m'EIE.PHM
RHR & GORT'1FN INC 3A3 3?? 45?3 P.Az
pnoJ[sr ,/gVEY REOIpEI€E rnonor xo €91C1
srE:cT iEvtgEp llt€t Fflll'tlt*i D^rE A'tl'€g
.DRf,irY KL @
9FIFS€N LU T'(ltgtR'ilD)
AryEF'R'TE SHTPED
AFEA V 2rt2 at?1',ca
OVER ATEAflGD F|Atr
TFu#Eg
61e^uVn Roo(
&4',r/,r ler
gltlPs€N Ltplp
rN\GFItED)
2xD #FtT
TOTAL P.A2
RHPT 131 Tot^tN 0F uAIt., c0LoRAno
======::========::============j==;:==============:==::========::=l========:------flctivityr 895-{tElEt lel A/93 Type: F-FUILD Status: I55UED Constt': N$FR
Address: 1339 GREENHit-t- CT
Locationr SAME
Ie/fr5/93 O6:45 REOUESTS FOR INSFECTIIIN t ORK SFIEETS FORzlt/ 3/i3
Far.cel : EtBS-ll4*03-et09
De scr" i pt i on : NEW SFR
Applicantr BECK & ASSOCIATE$, INC
Owner"r H0VEY CHARLIE
Contr"actor': BECH & ASSOCIATES, INC
Inspect i on Reqrrest Inf ot'mat i on. . . . .
Reqr-restor.r BRYAN-BECK & ASSOCIATES
Req Tine: IZIBTOO Co*nrents: LAIJREN
Items l'eqr-rE,Eted to be Inspected..,
A0AJO BLDG-Franinq
Inspection History.,, . .
Iten : rZrO0lD FL.DFFoot ings/$t ee I
0A/AIl95 Inspect or.: DS
Item : Ururrzrera BLDG-Foundat ion/Stee1
$8/15/95 Inspector": CF
i-Item: -OO5€O trLAN:ILC Site F lan
. liltem : rZrO@3O BLD6'-Frarning
IL/e9./93 Inepector: CF Antion: CR EORRECTIUN REGIUIRED
NOTESI RECEIVED STRUCTURAL UF'DATEs FRCIM EN6 SEE REVISIONS FOR FI
Occ: OOOT Use: V N
PA6E
AREA: CF
Time Ex
HAs ILI]
Act i on Co
Fhoner 3E39zr9 IS|DO
F,hone: 5O8*5E6-7464
F lr on e : 3O394T l SOO
Fhone: 949-74E6
tE
I NSF,ECT l ONS ' t'e/AL /95 tr+r,s.giect or.: CF Flct i on : NR
Item: q$A4E BUDG-Robf & Sheer" F,lywood Nail
Itenr : A0gl3A BLDG-Insr-rlat ion Iteml 0AIAGA BLDG:Sheetr"ock Nail
Iten : laqluBla BLDG*Cor-rr.tesy
It en : rA0raTla BLDFMi sc.
Iten : Atqtetga BLDG-Final
Item r eq53'A BLD6-Temp. C/$Item: EA54A BLD6-Fina1 C/0
At:tion: FI
Qct i on: ffFtrR
SOUTH l/E ONLY
AF'F.ROUED
BRrucEr-r-.sn
@dzzae
@G,.rz-,cfua gffi lhel
=^, {-T 4r,@
i
-t -l
UI n
C a
O (D a
f\) tct
l
\o
fCD3
PJJ=
.' (n a') (.i
-ror(Ir >COr('r
it tz
: i:r i:r ofr|Fr
033
rr !!
a
f
(tl
LUI
za>
!
'' z
PZ
I
;o
o
I
f'' (D C Hx ! !t tD --rt > EDF @cDm r C1 r- r-i>irl -1O Z .r H@ zz ct z(n or I 6'>H3O!
^Zm0rUlH tuc 3 | o >z
-O @ o.r (J|c)c)C m Ol- O-.1 (I, (rl :l o l,AaO:Em r a )aQ Z> A HC >-i f NH Hm O mD t-! f a> z 3 - rua\r m @ tz @ < lJom-r :l nrlooco >):
H
=
HHg)Z t tf H 6|rq,N
--{ E >m o o d(ntD
ct rt
I
Tfa)
mr!
olo@(,
qll 6)
'Yto-rt
m<tc2
0+Z *o
(I|3
fno t] CD OI
(] E-'2 ra
s o(,l o _tl
. f cr -r o-{ !(nrJ>! rm Por o:c (,oroal 0z d-F OH HCUrr]@ >Cl Ji|/, mA iOC)<t c|HroD cn<c30. --{ zmoo m rE o @D r, >i C]I'ooo >c azTzI z1 J, (/|.n m c)r]F -H oro H(r1 3!TlnlJ.) <n 'tt .| IHO O >i nZHI:--l -J f,lh Hllrza:,o a por H I\o -.1c ,.!, Zo \O .E(,< c) rn vro< v) !(Do (n lcDF rrl ro (,H Ito-o:f,Po !C, CrCF> O ol mz cr>mo(/) fi o, mrn rlt (, (, ut oo cro | !(D f !n>r,rD 6,Io Ic HHl(/lm z lr) c!('/l z:tmrn z m F OH m | > A oro z I r^r!Q o l.|o 3c' n>oom -rl
I .| 'E *DOjI(, O cr c'n r-i nc' Fr !, 'to . I r!86)F O'tdl l\ @fiz (, o, | >H!m x : !{a) c z oo
oF()Z"-rHr-rJ(l)*z ffi ,o
-!
{3
i9
C)
a (rl
cu
I
CN
L(!
F di
;
3
6 o
I
I
z
f-"g
rir
R"J
i.r dl
o
)
--l
-a
!
ul
O
(D
a
f\, (o
F)
fcD3
-!(-{-c
ooocD
rn
!o-*;'
C(.|1('r _nno E.t tz
ritil orr|m o o=3
!E
!!
mm tn th
!!
!
@cD
(tt:t
z
(DO
f
I
(D
aur o'o
za1
T
!
-<o
PZ
a
>F z --1 -m
@
UI
N '1C
o -tl
ct --r !Lo!>H T_m c oI cno r a) ct oz o cD ots Hccno@ >(l @! olcDm m(n --{oOO C) -- re>. Hf<)- Ur< i !-i ZmoO m .. H(l (!! tr Dt o! zrtr >c -z!,zt z1 D o>Lr1L4 m OOF a-* O :!F(n I IrFm(, -< a) O, (Jl -C) IHO > r.| >Z H TtzE{ r r- uld (Jt o c)iLO HrT|ZH! C0 CDP O --t F D\G) iC O il ZQ\Cf,I[o>]srrr c,m 140< ut It 6 )g1Q (n !C >- rn FC tr! -6)Tc)I NF !6) crc@> c, m-mz o>rnoc. m rt mm m(/J (, a =O.JrIC!HFaufi TJn>mrn 6 DZ rc HH!(,m z @!.m-i @th zDtnrnz m ruLooo OH m | > C,z I rl\Jlo fd, al>Or)fll Tl HF(/,! H!(,rI(n O rfH I--i!c)HD.N . I X!!6) arl n u)rnz >H!m x c z ao (D c]-D > @r\)-.) ZiH - Ol rrl {D e Z o|H(/)(Jla Ngl
o(D @ (/,
oir o,
al -c
Z +o
ul "-
o @0,
<) cr+z t-)
' ( ct -l
cto coo
ol.]
nq
i na
t--,----- rl1 -------
c
@
c
<D a
I
ID
(o
E
3
6
o o
A x
i
2
k4;
CE q)
ql
l
c,
c
lD
7J qP 5>ori
a:P^,, x 0 lll
o ;x IE
(D
ro-(,|;
I ___t
-)
C a -o
C a
O
(D
a
\J LO
l
\o
_._t
3
J
F
o
f F f J3 EO aaoo@
nJ (4-*al
o - qLILt--r
cD n-no @o i I t z
(D -t omm
'_ _ o33
un
!E
mm rr !!
@!!@
C!@CD
NN'
a{
I tE
{\rO
f
lo
cn
@
ts-.i I LCn r'io I o.tt ioT I Hm <1a- lJ!'l]J- | Zo mrD I --{ H o, l r(' l-o.D @u)> od !cJ r. or I r xr-o) sor. l >Clts" q . . l^i m. o) aos rr m _rlo rt @ocD r t
o -c u,--t :H rl e.o{= 63 .dr-i-?g b= i!;,o i;=a - f nul^,I t6l mo "EB 9 9 ?= 'oi - fo | | 21
- rr *lOFl6)\ ^ ())ooi I r N -! . I m F O(t (t o (rl I
xol at- paio>H tsof aI (/lo r a-tr) {!ddP QH gC(J]ct@ @tDarr
=d., nA ioOO re>O HI<)E'' !cao -1 zmoct Fg)fD o clI n > -.i zm a).1 o >c IzrzT d)>.te |./1(n fi OC)a !o<r Fo 3llt-trlu) ot(Jl H tl c rBo >z O F -n Z H! --r Ur(J|.'C):t t(,.l HmZiD O O --.1 *0t F !\Cl{C !-C?' ?o \o Ern hH arr < Qrq ('lo< (n lf uro (, !C>* . HC o (uH t6)T(1:l Nts so lcit Cl-Cd> m!o r mz l)>mol/| rn o mrn m(, (, 3 oo Qo | !@ Cl,s m J l,ar>tnfi . nz po !C HH!Otm O..fil--l t o a! ln zElnmz (,lgiotn r oH m | >rro z rr-N!o o O ;lc' Tl>O.)rq dH!n o ! Hto(JI(' ffH 06 rr !o H . F.r 'ro:E,Md)m
cL _t m (rlnz o >H!m c z oo * l\,o o CD O-iO (o^)-o al z-lF a!-g)E ts Z r\.)
^')
Ul 'dI*0r lJ q1
'o
i.{
a (rl
UI
I !o
I
16
o
I
ar
UI
?l
?l ol
?l ml I'I
r_l
;l
'7dit"
t't's
qd
,
E
2
fi
g
o z
iiil
glil
Ir lg
iiii
|;il
iiii
Egsi f?rl
ii
Ir
il
a
!I
ii
l!
ll
llr
!r I
II
ti
ti
{I
!t
!i Ir le la
I
I
a I
t
I
i t
I
i I t
I
c
I
t,
I
.t
I I
t
at
ll ri
lr t.l,
ff l3
li
fil
iI ,.
frl
!I
ii
il
I t t
A
B
2
F
6
6
I fi
{i
f I
!
1
I
t
I
I
5
t
iiii
$!it
iilt
til llr
tfi
lil
iil
iii rtl llsi
ot
@
@
o
;,
t)
q|
-l -)
C a _il
c
CN
ff
.D a
AJ ro
..cl
IfCD-
! O -,la:,-JJ3
^)CD@Ncr
@@@
e"3
olorro
o
!|J3c lcoo>H c D-r-coz oo ro.1 o @ >:c]H Hcuoco @sr- @@m r.o i r' m-i iOc)O rtse l-F> J-m -.r FiI()1' n D a Ia ZmaO - HcD a rnrna ! >-1 Zrn to @>t> lzTz Lo 6)> o c Oat - m Oa)H o t O,O --r:f [r ]O-m(, O x llro l: H r tscJ t-z o :<-1r) rrzHt-r OlO.r a)c) i\J arrnlo HmZH! dllo- --1 A)i >=ZE'\6)rCODxCrr a)(!-@ \rj f(/| f in Or mmoH Lto< ur a oro
CO:O cl (, 1)C>H HC rnj -t t.)- o tc NH A,o:f z c:FC@> Tn!nc>o a)>mo!1 m ot (,ll-'rl rnol,' 3 ')nlrr r :D@ ot cD m cJ > (/|^ l.rlDmm Dz @.D ClI nJ HtsD('m OoJm-l lDa I > >- Z lmmz n.)nroLl <r cm 3 rrNlo (o-t O * rtl Tl>oom ts!@ 1 -HC'II\J 3 BI'(rII(, )JH ZC) '(D !()-{z m IEE6| m zoD amz > mcl{/) >H om ln ar z oa @@ -lr-n Cf -! o(r-(,OX> Za-1 Ul(tl@ r!! (, >- Z @O.o O Of On e E Cm au ol
' Im !
+ rQ
q
I
D
m(,
@D
cfm
tt 6)mz
tfo
rc cE(,
z
'r
art
,.c
cto oo
or
o
r
m
o
CD c --l
I
I'or
O OOA-n rt r1c I a,t tz : :-:,:
m omm
ll !D
! -t!
r rr ! !!
-l
=J a)
=
-{
o! ttl im til z.r .1 lll
-H o I I I
r_ !trl r-lll !mttl xi_ i I ll -nlil :m - I Il ) !lll
o|-|'J tl an6))l
<o ! I '' z m ttl _H o t.l ez c--tC) H
l:o
Zr
t-
999
LJO('
olog)
;biD
Ho tlT r <1rr <a r
oo Ho cD@ > tsUll': Od O ll A)op 3 d)o)F.r of Os. -- "O m oooo o,_no Pot r-,
rI1O {n C'
-1 Ftt o f H hjo_nr- | e o o)!s -r| n Z ) tso ooo o-)@ pr t >oo th o "-mo
. -o oo
O OOo)(lj O'
z ooll,t -a
l--.1
;
C9
e
(l'to (rt
- n) n)\ oofiF
F!
<<P )
t
3
2
$o s
A
f i
2
Ah
ol
:-
-t
AJ t,
t
?
ql
-)
t-(,
T,)
a:a
rl
rD
U)
nJ (o
:l \o
PJJ=
m
:Er z
ccnir amm
o33
E!
tr!
mnl
rF !10
t!
gt@
3
E
L'
rO
qL0
z(1
i0
o
U1
-<o '' z
YZ
:t
z1
r
P
I
> @* @CDm a) r- l-->io Z - r-r g)
6' Zfi D c)>3.D!morUnB f r o >2 cD cjr d rjr .) 6r m @- O-1 !o!(rrHli a ) U)E)co Hc
=
F.lF <) m!( frt z=fuAJ ln & uz -< c)urm -r eOO(/J
f ts*t/l
:E f f H .ilN !m
frl onJ-o E(O@ C 0., '.1(,
!fl a
oo cD(n
ol| o,
mo(,ct a-c
o+Z Fo
o @0)
z f )
o\ fz
-<o ^z
- -o tnc
m z>
cr z@ m:l o>
IGI
m a
' {si ari !t/l u>-.POJ OI (rO r.)a)
--, clH tsc!r1a)oJ :tia mu) :oc)o FIO-'C3a j ZmCO (D O (DD iC >r r)r)o >c Lzaza ' J- 6ri an oox o'o H(, 3T,t_1M
q * rtz,al J {t1 >,mZH!*o, ! ;o\OrC
-u1 ZC \C f(o < cJm aa< a,)@ -!C>'i
l! (r* !c-rr--a tsro !6) c-cco>o) mz a)>mo(,o fnm m(r!o o.n oo | lco :' Iln>mm ro rr C FH::tmm :n @(,/, zafimz r OH fn i >oro Z trNlO o .)o 36) 1l>oa.)m tt H-(rl:lst @ o- :l --r !.)| '1 c' r IEE6.)ts o, ': 11 AmZ >*T)m iF c z o(J o6D (D Cf *I|(Dr O 24,1
.,re-z F_t=_=-___fi r 6
qI
lo
Cf
ao
.h
rur
CD
!r (-
z
b t
P
I
fr o o I !
o 2
{H Fef."'K
k?:s
!C
(D
-)
)
o
)c
3
-:
ul!or
-
c-a
T]
(:
N)a tscJ \O cl)a
OrI]
FJ :l
F
CD C - E@:E Il (D lD OOO > @P (D@m a) t-e r-ll !{-.)C z d H@ t Pf frI a ztn o oooo ! (il> o ar-:rft 3 O E (o OOclI nlo,rnH 3 lo >Z Ntu^JLo @ !- (Jl a) 6)m CD- O-r x m EO!5!.(]l0|ta)Ln)Hr'l (' f (no :s xrin !l Fc
^) H r F]H o ri! o orcl)ot>5 T -g3g:
AJ G', lTl (D 'n rt'n o @ EZ O | | | 2 < cDurm J d PEFrrn nJcD6(,.a ut ul Lt
r *Hul ') r|)tnm
I f tH _ 3f l
! m !-D
''u _o !
--r'!!!
o(D
(D O)
(tt t
l\) o
ca o!
za1
!
<o 'z
I
z1
trl Er m F\r-O *O(D
E
a
oo !0 (Jt
cfu ol uJ Oa" o
Z lo
tn "- !mo C, @o)a)o
z r)
IU -!
tts
I
:o az
--z hJc
z>
ra '-
{!
z
a)I
tf
!(r->!r rm (no rcto oz ec(,ato, >c)
HIo!' (r<
zrnao m ! >r OD IZrZt Z1 m Oc)H -H 3!l.m!1 <..)I Hcf 'nzHii r HmZHD A !\C)ic \q) I@ Lno< L],) !!q >! m tor-a) !crc@> cJ cl>rnoao m maa a I E('I}n>mrq 6')HH!UJln Z z l)rntn z rn mr > cJ | -to!o n>ooln al H;o(rJ r ur o It c] >i io 'r!!c)@mz >HIlm
O'- D
*z
ol
OI os ln(n
cr!>c
zo clm
-o cl mz
tr|o
rr C:
z 36|!
'I GP
@
G'(9
c c)
6 (rl
c30.(lro
'Je
J
ol
F --l
n
DI {
P
2 I t o I ll
g
6 2
ffi*
c)
I c
-)
-l -)
c
0.)
1-l
C a
cl
(D l\J co
l-P .o5
o oa) cr c PeJJ3 .!ooo-
- o*-F'
(t1 c tuur:
n nno I ar rz
i-n r ir' -m c rn rrr o
! !!
- ra :o otl
@o
3
tf
rl':
;6
(rl o
moo .) l-c
Z -o qlt
f (.' i .-r I uc uFEr fll -or or .no ic)o oz --- oH *c\r.):D >o (D'- (E@fi
!i3(r , zrnoo m r Fou @o@D!>ic)!Zr,t .)1o >c Izr2t =4 ! c)>'7- lr, rh m ood r_H o !qO -(, IIJTrnl]l <r.] IO Lt -?t o | -c, > eo ->z o' Fr rlzHr:f - g.' ctn-J at, F.-.ZHII !, (D- Or !\6r{c o ,o - 6 zta \cJ :E (' !r m < om !40< c1 ! U) - at)(Dc]' (t l,c::D'i m sC .! (rH lt6)-ol NH :q !Q c--c.DD cl mI'o I mz o>-oJr rr m o mrD rt ot L,) (, 3 Ol1 OO r !@ * *N m :t or>mm a . nz HO rC HHDmm Z loFm-l :,o oo zumrl!'z rn l\Joo(/|x OH m | > O o,.! z r-tulQ o cI 3c) rl>oorq -n HH{/o o ! H-(!I{' O ffH cji Ir lto H ,o -ro r Ml6) m a lrmz o, >Hom x c z ocl .to @ O-I' > @r\)-.D C) Z1F r CDOI@ z a)un
U|Alo
'n !
€
c a
at)a
o
@
I
!
z
P
F
2
a
I
6 z
cl
a c
1
3
..
--l --l
a !
L a
O o a N'-
lFr (c .,or
tqIri rr: I'i/r!>H D- t@i -of OI Lilct I C)o (D !(D !oo cfH H=LIalcD (D@m .o+ J-o lir(n arl 11 --i<)OO -E> t6 S n !o! It d !.).,c qgcr -r ZrnOO HcD f -; rt=qq .9 @! 1o P: znt ..! ooo--1r (, >c .E2IZT cr> O O ,-r i -r m
o.o F|!0 3lrmt Ul r, H 'orD -)f a) rHo . >z o Nn)i\rL1 rrzHti uroa)c, n) xxx-to J f(]0 HmzHE oo--r l\lx m a,\c)--{c a xF !.g)cDr-ZO \Cl Ilt HH m 5 < (]m u1o< u) ::rulo * r|*-n (, _u, c >H . Hc rr\)@ (,/r>< Do-c)t Nd A.' On,^-ar I !-.0 '06l C-CCD> mlt o {Crcr|>g f mz e)>mo(/' ft o -r cctcnr 0, mm tnut(t = -t ooo-oo oo r ! (IJ (JLJ m (D nn(f t !_n>mrn . Ilz g)o t: | | z !. rq HHlom oo)m--{ .Dd *FL.l f at cDCn znmmz .!\.Jor,F OH ml > .t(D -dlul oJo z lTNlioo rD-t omm oo 3c| n>O(.)m HHL|| ) _ Cl .1 ! *!rrI|-n :if H -- ofl on I-r !a! H N - a@@ ro I :!lo!C) m :o!o't ln amz
" o*!m C Z (]CI F' aa .)O @ c]H! Ur@- !t rD a) z--rH s'Fo -nn
Z NNLO \\' (Jr F mm l, N ct ulth 'o
- ! !-lt
I t:J
ot(')
ot ul
cr (D a!
3
f
tjll'
z(-
-
!
-ll o
'' z
tc)
I
Z1 r
<l T Or nJ.-
o.o@Lo
cf { or I O) (rJOl!
m oJ Fo*-n o -1-' FoF
moo
Z Pa o l ul or ul
> O ^JFN a " r (lJ Ltl (,
c] @ !l)
z -)
t' tt -ra_\ -- (r) O t^l AJ ''O F c)(/| llc)u
(t
<0
c
6 (tr
I lo
ul
t-=1
rO
C'r
l
o
rn
z
Di t
P
2
6
I
6 z
a
CD
o
o
)
3
;,
C
ol
T]
c a
c.)
rD A) ('!
.o5
Q r roco;o>H r.F on !r f|!-Ot (tOr.).) Hx :O (' -(D Ooo oH HcLta)(D rF b CD(Dm mO1 3oOO f (-) r_*> Jr Hro! tt - !(lc)c - z.noo -a) z H(D t: -=J-@o ! > r f Z o Zan f (D noo5 >t= J:Z rZI O- 6'E OO .'t.: rt (,ln m O(.]H H :I iO o,@ ocOa FL4 =!r-m(, ^Z m CJr L, ts 'O ?D .) I aO NC f >Z o NhliJLl a1 lr1a1L1 -Q @ Ul(Jlo6l N \xx!{!) HmZH:l C m OO-{
^Jx
:rt H D\CrrC (I)(,
'O :O x5 .\o:oral z(f\oI(ro(rH!ma-i cfrn (ro< (, r lJuto Laf !c: F* z> a Hc *A)!0-. Dir-.)-f >- I
'\) Cn,--al''B g) crc(D> Hm o mE o -root !!= Q>mot,, r! t m o': c(,Ln:mrnmq)@tn>z3roo--c,o r !(D - 6ts rn (D _nflc
!r>mm cD !z cDo { I I Z lr C HHIT(,]m CO "< n)cDm-i rD rt Aelt
co L1 zlmrnz D ctrdro|]rl crH mr > > r( 6a f dllt z | -t!;oo .) o"1 omm 3C) n>Oorn H { Hk(n ) - o -o HDUJrIO Z I :rrH -- Ct3:a I--iI!1Hc)mFJ'|,r|.n ';It,!C)Drr|l]D (1 tJ|m z > m >!-orn caz().-3l,ruAJ @ OFI' > m eFT !t O Z--{H a) O FF@ -n n *ZI-nJnJUl Ln E m H mm AJ dl o It rna o m rr \r C, !!
!
o
'' z /z
!
zi -rn
!:o:
:tr!1
caa (DO
oo r,
-)l
f
o,
J
0ro oo
'i' o (f,:d t"
--'-._--..=-__:1-
oro(oo @ol(Iro
f{
I:
za)
r
<-) r (Jlul*
oo @(]1
c, I or
m o so--.no r _r cDoiD
anoo
Z tso o1 (Jt o LJI (!3 > O tO"@ th r N(,N
CJ @O
O Cl-
- D tst(r-GJO(!
^J
*!F 614 6J()UI
l_-J
;
c (0
t>
E att
,
E
2
6
x
i
2
,H
H$
,{;
e-,i
Il c
Lll
lo
ui
-t
3
i
--r !(nD>! fF @ T! :.r!-l O-E (rO r al.) HX ! CD OOo oH HcLncl@ {!. D (D@rn +|o cl-El m!/t roclo I rl a-->F|IC)! .) F. ! .r !()oc 3 ZmoO J<) Z HCD ! -:ttf (tr rC n >t EZ 6) Zri o!0 ooocD >t: lZ-EZI Oi qr> oE dt-)-l
L4 Co m O.)F i 3 ! ,oO ocloD HIt 3!r lll(/1 ^Z m u.|lll' H OO o ! no r\., c f >z AlNArr'* rlZHt+ -O tD (Jlur(lCJ N(]) xxx!tl!)ImZHECmOO--1 i 2l\orc cD(/' :o ! t,!. l. cD ci c)zcr\o:a@4../)44fi c)m (^o< (, - :JCOO :rO an 'Dc >f- z> a 'c n) -l
(r) H ;oora)I >q a !o crc(!> -- o mto oru {o)crir,rnz .r>mQ(..l -! { rr1 r x cJrulr .rm m(ro ut> z 3 0) croo-oo I EcD - FF m @ -nllal 1l-nEmm It - nz o* fr rz { c FFl(,rn cI) < F\m- dm ,rrt
cD LD ZDmmZ ! \.,Jo(/l OFr mr > > r .Do € Ctr Ul z r-tulo o i-r omm 3ct llDo.)m H r: HHt _ c)! Hlr! IcD Z t l)a -(t (fl3
.:! I])!c) rt m - FD m l/)ftl z > m >H!m c z ocf -r r ru nr 1 u)a (D Cr|-! > m oorr '- IJ!C) Z i- a) Ct (O (O (! - Irl P z I c (t dr u,t F m h mm AJ 01 O ! AA o m r-! c, !!
fgi -o:t
@.D
' :te
t') ::
* :-
!
<o '' z
I
z1
r
|-l
a,@ orl
za)
T
o--Jc'
<-t r LJr o1l,l Lr -
o(D @@ ts o-c:)( dr ru*r Of ..J AJ g) O r.
m. 0r suooa no:) cD@oocD
c) -c
z eo nJP ot oNgrg|(n
> O e('rgltslo a "r lnroLtnJ
c, @o/
c) cl"z -J
r I nJ flJ lo*\ ^ d] Cn.5 <) (,1 nJ *!.. O tat o)oloouJ (5
c g)
all a
-1 c a
1J
i
U)
tf
rD
r\)|.- (t)
,
g
P
?
g
I
6 z
!-t's
e+;
c
;
1
'1 )
U)-11
a
O
(D
a Np
FJ (o
.ol
o o,c !
o'-*5'
nfto at tz
t(Jlur omfi
c,3_<
DI'
-r !!
@o@ ol or r!
flj CD (D
'D
a
I
(oulg
cta
TJ
--
<o '' z
PZ
I
Z-
m
tq l o-r !(/|E>H arJ -ol OI LaO t a)a) @ ll!i.OH -'CUt(-)@ @(!m f ,,(]n |-,t c.r rooo rF> ->o ro! ! d ri 3 u -r zmoo HCD f ID o CD It ! >r Zln 4a (1n a bc xzlz:t o> ots ' :t- aa m ooH E Oct oa H(, f o-rnt]o L,I ur H oo 'tf a) tFA - >Z n Z*t r LtUrC)6r ru(,J f rrn *mzr! c,o-1 L\CJ3C D a-./a zc) \(f I(, tsH m < c, rq (^o <, Ln f f wlo r! g (, !c>- Hc njr r! lnH 'Dc)r-a-)I F-.D !C) C-C@> mn oni o) mZ .)].mO(',o, mm ntcoo, 3 C')OncfcJ',ocDnrum@ J L1>mfi !Z O*!q IC HHD(rm toolm--{ FnJ ).) (b (, z!mmz @ooCn x OH mr > Oo oo z t-ArDcr -r-.)a 3o rr>oC.)m HF@ o ! Hllurl:(,4 r rH -cD on :!-i lal H N o -:o r rl.|6] m o m 6rnz 0, >H-Dlrl O C Z Otf **rro c! cr*t| 5!r rD at zrd @@cE (] * z (Jllur
UI AJ GI
<-7f FFA(rru--
o(D @ (./)> C)d O rl . o (r., g I I ot OOUTtsOuJ Oe_ Cl m O U, CO fV '.J o dt no!) F6(Jlutocn
moo
Z *O AJA O) g'UlOUrUl
@ .3 > o otwur^)l,s a '-- olotsodl
o cDo
o clP z r)
r I n)A.) PFF o|oro(r)uJul
^) * -It F OCO c')Or<)rrura
r---------=1
€t
@
G'
(o (o gl
r-l
F=l
lo
Or
(D
E I
2
8 o
T t
i-
x
q(3**'{4
ftt)
!c
@
f
;\,
o
c
3
c ci ljr -r
TITIO €r rz
omm
!!
rlr E !J .C oc o>1. c ! -O- rCOZ (4C ' .).) o @ - (D c- >r6|H tscrr.)@ @cD- rDCDm D i m -] -oc]o r_+P rP>-F m { FiIo:D i !rO (n f lr) ZmOO d H (tl r:<E mmr D >! zm !o c, cD>rJts tzrzi ,o cr>i!0 c)- r m c.)H .D :t oLo o 3J::- 3 cT'mot O, (t LI F € O {r - F | tsEt o >z o rnI = -r(-l -zHr-i I I I' otuta)o n)D> nmIO 4rr1z4U C)(D- OO: N><c) r- >= z :)\orc o !Ir oco*(n \- M f kH m mmoH (,lC< |,') (J} f l(rO !@ C4Dor, !C>,i !c: .N -m -r IJ.')T.II Fr* nJ < (f3l c-cc,o> rnE , a -ncDL) rt>mo(]1 rn o -1 / a4 n rn(.rl(, f 't {, m-rr r D@ auru m c)i > Lo^ fl l>mm 8z f,ro ! (]1 tu HHDIim Ululrn -r O -F :r>>- zi6mz (Do,o(,@ <i rn I c cm 3 rrnJDo o)--r O Prn r>O.)m HBt-4 )--m *(1a\J:I F.!d=La rrH o z(l '@ Do -lz ri . M6) rrl -- zon utt\z cD >m.)Cr) >H!m -< (n a) z oo tJN
-rin o-rc (nulr
O (nOI> Za.r !!@ --{r!!l'*ZCnatt,I O O-r Ln +m l: cm nr o)u z @z .)(/l Im ..J
- tc,
z-tc)>oo
-2,r-{o
- :o rrl
=>2.c)z.{ul 4 T-q>>ml -l 5 frl {o m(fl ?JAr-z:cc)
afo I^or(,1
=O-z.>oro -m r, 1D
'rt -orrtE !>Gr c)^c. 7, u,zv
o-<9 nm
=^O a--<>o-l
=qf'r zfrto c,I'z oz.O-m
=, <1
ro
z,
!
'' z
Yz
I
z-1 -
fror(D @@@@-l--t 1-to.) .)ooar(-)a)Fio or-oc)(Ja-<t -f-fffr C (nAn)-
rl]OAJfO o, orot-ru|ctop{- i oo > -J..JO I r:t -t
o .l F@NNTUo)! 3 r I O OOO<'OOrt UJ9FUJ O'. f m (')01Od ooOo<)oo, o L/l! \l(-rl ltocDgrlD l Fo, or (Jl ul cD ro. o, or mo\.1--.Jod
H t.@f\JAJnrO)Tt_O r.- oOOoOO-n Z -. o o . t nJF.,(D OOlJOOOO l,lOOUI @ qro
> oo-o o t.Nr\JA Ln OOO Or q|FSCD
mOed C) F FnJ<)O'3(,
z oooooo- t,
\ nJN Cn FOIo)mF UJ (.1(, (,(-o) oooo<)oo ur trr urui
o <<<<<<F .:
- o:t oI .r-F oH r.r Ln m@
g) o cu!o. r, >c ' at- l a oA H01
f f r/)
, @ zo < o atl
rn
O (])H !c)
o rnfi
ea Ic I o l!(,x oH oo z o .|o :io !
'o oa Ij
F. ,la 1 frl (.r . jIrJ
INO ID iF'. o !!
-r lJ!-l
{DCD@(DCD
@oor@o
{f::
!::
dr o)@o
o!
t-
'" Tll Itl i| tl 3ttl i"lll mlll ;lll
,..illl eltl (rttl
HIII (/ltit
#lll
c -r-
H o
t_
q Fi lo
aa
cl)
c G'
(tD gl
ltl
..l
-)
;
IJ
L
U]
tr-l N.t ts(,
-(r),)
i
r
?I t o
6 2
#..$
&u)
oi
a
a
r\r
-)
o
L.
)t
t
a,
!
I
U)
cf
(D
a
fll
FJ (o
\ol
i.:ara;c /J=aa
CUlLnr
,at tz
.: ,r' in orrlm
a< a
'1' t
mm
rr aJ!
3
ro
f
-_o o
'z
PZ
:)6)
-
>!z4
;^
9
:
r)-r O(n:! >* C oi Coo r(-)o o @ c|x Hc uloca qr, @{Dm m(n iooo t-e l--->HIO,o' 4 !'| Zftta)C) d HCD ('r)IJ a >-i zln >c t z rzl t 6>tt,t, rn --1'. o lo ,,t1, I l]t'rt1rn tu ,. !n ..r l) | d(f >Z -r rlz![: nJr+ rr] ut a) c.r t(,) rrmZH! (ll- OO+H ,o\c:)rc o !ZCJ \O I(, f *Fi rn olrl ulo < (.o U| :, > ur 6J u) lrc > F! Hc !)-i -ocl-o:r 'IJ 6' Crc@> m-rnz o>mou) m fltm mo(, l cJ ct | ;o (o tse m o n>rnm lJz IC HBl(],]m Orurm--{colJ| zDmmz ooo(,OFr m I Z lTf\l!Q lo rtbo.)m s:r@ ! r{-(r]a(,J -r :la)':r Inncr m m t tnz >H!m c z ocl @ OHD oror-O Z4d (Jl Lt gl
P Z CD@l,an r-rugl
o|Dc!(,
noi-,
lrloo o rc
z -o
o qr 0,
z f a
{u''r
ctlD a)rr d
).'
tll c')
-7 eo
g
(€
c d,
B
t
3
2 I
*o o
o z
K
ffi}
ru
.rl
('t!9l >6;
', o
;2
I
-.)
C
(n
rJ
c0
{t NJ rD
U)\c
(1:]
:)
OD
o
F
!-ralC
-lJ3
c)j1
ro!
!!
(!@
!
cnrr r--c
| <c LlI z
I
I 21 t6i
.-ji o(/|!'.H c o! uro I ctr- o o oe iCLn.l@ CD@* @cDm mlo iooo -Fe --.>|rlo!,' i :O r zmoo d HcD (rr lJ ! > i Zm >c rzrzt ! 6)>(,LamO.lFOI)*L1 :! ItTrn(t or F Llt H a) r,rcl >Z ,r ar zHf: L!rd (ruroc)!La HmZHI) CnnrP 'CO!H :l\6):C Zir \O X@ I |r! m om l.rro< u) q )a\ra t-o !(:D>r HC v)* !c'r.)I !c) c-c:cD> m!m= ar>mo0,anm rfl (, (' 3 oc, I ruj orr>mrn nz r(: HHEtlln (Jldlmi ao zzlnmz ooom OH rn I Z rrnr!O 3c) -rr>Oom FHLo ! rr!(rJ:lcn :rH I i !a)' I I'OIJO TN m amz >H-om c z oo {El c].,! }.-Jr c) Z-lH oA(t i Z !.oll,)UI F'
H@cD-3lr-l
-f ooocrcl0 Hn ClCtClr- Ct-<a1r--rrr <
aa om Ho
qf x P3 ooooood
rr1. ooooooo, o no
mo
-,1 ts 'o
H F$+O)+* nr-o o5'0FltrrP -n z)CDITo)IOEEO,
>o au mcr
o croooood, o,z ooooool ../'
-\ srral.ur(rme
A FTJ+FUTUIEI o o..t o ol|..r.,l
<<<<<<F 1
(Do
-.r :l
@
d)
ffi c 6)
6 art
ol
\
c
7
H
fr[
EH
ao
I
-l
c
3
io HP
-l -)
c
(n
3 a a
NP ts- '.Y \o*
(o
o-
F
!i_/(.]c
r!oo(!
oqcri)
cor(,:
rarrz
omm
!!
!o
u)(Dul
olc
!
f
'z
'z
t
za
f E :t - --l !(r-D>H ---o:t CII LnO rO(.l CD op,.rd/ o4 !c(ln.)@ cDolm J-.4 mA iooo r-> dt o Frolt !! lJ . Z.1AC) dCD f gl o r-D,€ ! >r Zm O(,cr'f (' >C TZIZT 6lD oF JP tA rn O.l< 20 'oo o.o Fcn 3 urmu) en ur F - J .) I HCf >Z rzHr: + dr(lro<) tu(,r r:(,1 *rnZHL OOi :o\circ rJ t!-- a ZO \O I(t FH m < om u)o< (7r If !4o
o trH 1]d)r_al .-o !6) CrC(D> m!o) rnz c)>mo(t m -tx o drm m('l(t f cn cro oct I lJ co n.) LJ m or I Lfl>mm .Dz o r r c HH:otroin @itm+ dru ) o aD (, zammz cDcDorn x oH m | >oJo z rrhrDo _t-
n{:r lo al>oa)m H4(,r) D Htt(r:f,(r JrH -(D oi Ii ioo -o r r!!6) m d ln tnrnz {)) >H_ofn (D C Z <)O --.)O CD Cf,*D F!'.D a) z iF c)@co z ul!c.)'ene cnru(h
<-rr Ui(!(!nJ.-
or or o) Allo50L,
m. O/ (rl!\UIOF -nO <'t t'OOO*
.) rc
z -o ru''o-) \/ ts LJt o) rjl
> o o)PLn,rao a " - oro(r(rr
o tD o,
z l->
r r NA) iD'-\ - oro1ooor
r- '- r, or or o cJ r.rr
--1
o
to
c)
a aJl
@
r--l
F-;l
,!
o
t
ftt|"-"r
g'gk
'.1. (
&'al
ql
\1
@ o
I)c
GJ
;\,
z
gP
=>t';;
-l -L a
1J
a
T-l fvd
H(')\o:(tl
l
c (,lU1Ltr
o mmm a cf :3 <3
lrJ ic: oJ)I)>rr (: tf -coz !10 r .).r o @ > -crH ic:iarco aD(D* @@m --1Oilo r-., r'- j'Fro- -n !lr) I(, zmoo |:anmM ..r zm f .o @>]]> rzrz:E ! c)> rDo OCj - ir O.)F rD l,iItT lil-m(/l O F 'OO I H >Z ll <O -OZl:i i (lr Jl rr OC) r.J -nmIO {mZi! tuN",>3 Z D\6)iC atcD..or \cJ I(,mmo* !n(f< \t a Q1A (o.!oLl tc>,r Hc *^)--r D6)-c):c NlH A)a rz cr-c@> mo nc>- i-)>mo(, m o'l cnH-n nU)D < -| :ll cD @lr) m > (n^ IrfrFmm Ez alo .)-l au ialtnm oom<x>>" zDrnmz @(ooll)< --{ mr d.D cr'] I r -fo:f,o o)o *m rr>oom -,.u) - -H(1ru1 H!(,r(,Z (, .CD DO rz ln rDD6r m zoD rtl\z >mo(, >H-ortl u1.) z co to@ .l-l n Q-:O tsFr-CaOI> Z--1,. t (,CD
IEp(J' ,,- z cD co r,
f cm ru o
Ifn to
f!fr (]i rrl>-ol clT 6lr
J,- o m(, >
a:3o i r-c)@ o @]c .<>o.i(,| >c o 't* tt(n -tt
OLO H(, O -tl a)o Fi nrt::t L(, ts>
') r-e 6 Zt1 :'Ir-.< c,m iD cr Ll| lJ ol rD LDH -|rl
-o n6) <o:) Inz r_l a, tnm o.r oo a J1 nc !> o {D (,x C'H aD oJo z c oo 3c|.)Dm
ro r
o, qt
^ r* c <i oo G,
6 o.. ar (l
l
-,"f*
f--- r - Y 6
x x x
+
=(,
frl
c,:l
Il {
I
€
Fi(r@r3
>.o C-r-CJr <1-r-r (: Lrorts m(! :l Olr r-(,o.!> AJ! qf,-!
c]r+CDrucDPS 1
'JC!oo- olo]Jt O+ e r m ,-ocroo, o ooo no Fo ulo(J
rno
--l 0.J ..J * !i tscDr0o)nl-o -.r€D o o ! _n
Ftlooo, or ctr crt ql !r.> O Or+CD ll1 d todlro mo
_c)o ooool), or z oooo- (n
r -e+$ *@-\ g)o)cnq1m- 6lO(J
AJ 5 <)000cI uroLJ
c;l
o! ttl Hm lll zc1 c) | | I rH o ll I
r !ttl -ttl TJ mlll xr- r I ll '> mlll
-m illl r_4lll
ol,l)ttl a t/lttl H rnttl -{L,)ttl
<o € | | I 'zmttl :-i P u.r
IO
z --1
!1 ! (/)
!alD n\il
- I' T'!!
@(D ut ul (o(o
x x
or or cn ot
eF'r'r3
ct
c 6)
!9
6
b
F
a
6
o
T
6 z
$H
rg;,
lj<-^i
fff:'*
t
c
(!
ul
This safety alert symbol is used to attract your
attentionl PERSONAL SAFETYIS INVOLVEDI When
you seo this symbol - BECOME ALERT - HEED ITS
MESSAGE.
CAUTION: A CAUION identiftes eafe operating
practices or indicatee unsaie conditions that could
result In peEonal iniury or damaqe to structurce.
HIB-91 Summary Sheet
COMMENTARY and RECOMMENDATIONS for
HANDLING, INSTALLING & BRACING METAL
PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES O
It isthe responsibil tor.licensedcontractor.
erector or erection con
brace metal plate connected wood trusses to protect life and orooedv. The installer
must exercise the same high degree of safety awareness as with any other structural
material. TPI does not intend these recommendations to be interDreted as suoerior
to the project Architecfs or Engineer's design specification for handling, installing
and bracing wood trusses for a particular roof or floor. These recommendaiions are
based upon the collective experience of leading technical personnel in the wood
CAUTION: The builder, building contractor, liceneed
contractor, er€ctororerection contactoris advised
to obtain and read the entire booklet "Commentary
and Recommendations for Handling, Installlng &
Braclng ltlbtal Plate Connected Wood Trusse , HIB-
91" hom the Truss Plate lnstitute.
DANGER: A DANGER designates a condition
wherc failureto follow instructions or heed wam-
ing will most likely result in serious pelsonal
injury or death or damage to structuro.
a
wherc failure to follow instructlons could rceult in
aeverc perconal injury or damage to structur€s.
TRUSS PLATE INSTITUTE
583 D'Onofrio Dr., Suite 200
Madison, wisconsin 5371 I
(608) 833-5900
truss industry, but must, due to the nature of responsibilities involved, be
presented as a guide for the use of a qualified building designer or installer. Thus,
the Truss Plate Institute, Inc. expressly disclaims any responsibility for damages
arising from the use, application or reliance on the recommendations and
information contained herein by building designers, installers, and others. Copyright
@ by Truss Plate Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. This document or any part
thereof must not be reproduced in any form without written permission of the
oublisher Printed in the United States of America.
CAUTION: All temporary braclng should be no less
than 2x4 grade marked lumber. All connections
should be made with minimum of 2-16d nails. All
truases assumed 2'on-centeror less. All multi-ply
' trusses should be connec'ted together in accor-
dance with deeign dnwings prior to installadon.
TRUSS STORAGE
CAUTION: Trusseshould notbe
unloaded on rcugh terrain or un-
eYen surfaces which could cause
damageto the truss.
CAUTION: Trusses stored horizontally should be
supported on blocking to prevent excessive lateral
bending and lessen moisture gain.
WARNING: Do not break banding until installation
begins. Care should be exercised in banding rc-
moval to avoid shifiins of individual trusses.
CAUTION: Trusses stored vertically should be
braced to prevent toppling or tipping.
DANGER: Do not store bundles upright unless
properly braced. Do notbreak bands untilbundlee
are olaced in a stable horizontal
DANGER: Walking on tsusses which arc lying flat
is extremely dangerous and should be strictly
8'-10' i 8'-10'-r- - -l
mel
SPAN
MINIMUM
PITCH
TOP CHORO
LATERAL BRACE
sPAclNG(LB5)
TOP CHORD
DIAGONAL BRACE
sPAclNG (DBs)
[# lrussesl
SPF/HF
Up lo 24'3lt2 8'17 12
Ovet 24 - 42'3t12 10 6
Over 42' - 54'3112
Over 54'See a reqislered professional enqineer
oF - Douolas Fir-Larch
HF - Hem--Fir
sP-
SPF
Diagonal brace
also required on
end verticals.
Top chords thal are laterally braced c€.| buckle
togelherand causecollap3€ itlhere i.nodi.9o-
nalbracing. Diagonalbrtcing lhould b. nailed
to lhe underside ol lhe top chord wh.n purlin.
ar. atlached to the topside ol thc top chord.
MONO TBUSS
INSTALLATION TOLERI\NCES BOW
PLUMB
Misplacemenl
D(in)D/50 D(fi)
12"1 t4"
24"1lz'2'
36"314"
48"
60"1-1 14"5'
72"1 t2"
84"-4t4"7',
2"
108'2"q'
L(in) U2oo L(ft)
1 14"4.2'
1 00"1/2"
150"314"12.5'
L(f n) U2oo L(fi)
200't 16.7',
250'1-1 14"20.a'
300'1-1 12"25.O'
OUT.OF.PLUMB INSTALLATION TOLERANCES.OUT.OF.PI-ANE INSTALTATION TOTERANCES.
Frame 6
WAFNING: Do not aftach cables, chalns, or
hooks to the web members,
.7t oo" (..
or less \,
[-l I tftr-l
.]t .. :,r _ .L r:_ !=l r-1
Approximalely
/,lruss length
WARNING: Do nol ltft slngletru$eswlth spans
greater than 30' by the peak.
MECHANICAL
INSTALLATION
Toe In
-.4'
- lpprJiimaiilv -r , ADDroximalelv ' tr'tlOtAlruss length
Tag
Line Tag
Line
At or above
mid-heighl
Tag
Line
Slrongback,/
SpreaderBar
Greater lhan 60'
Yr lo % lruss length
I
Tag
Line Greater lhan 60'
Truss spans less lhan 30',
_ .. :1,\9,1 !\ uss, |qIS!I
Less than or eoual lo 60'
Lifting devices should be connecled to
lhe truss lop chord with a closed-loop
atlachment uiilizing materials such as
slings, chains, cables, nylon strapping,
etc. ot sutficienl strength lo carry lhe
weighl of the lruss. Each truss should be
sel in proper position per lhe building
designer's traming plan and held wilh
the lifting device unlil lhe ends of the
lruss are securely taslened and lempo-
rarv bracino is inslalled.
GAUTION: Temporary btaclng shown ln thls summary sheel ls adequate for thc
tru3sea wlth slmllar conflguratlons. Consult a regbtered plofesslonal englneer ll a dlftcrcnt A
braclng arrangement ls deslred. The englneer may deslgn braclng ln ."coroanci mrt fpii I\
Recommended DeE gn Speciticaton lor Temporcry Bncing of Metat Platc @mrc{cd Wood f
Irusres, DSB.89, and ln some caees determlne that a wlder spaclng ls posslblc.
ot
GROUND BRACING:BUILDING INTERIOR GROUND BRACING: BUILDING EXTERIOR
Typical verticsl
vcrtical(Gav)
Gaound brrc.
di.sonal! (cBD).
Ground br.ce
v.nic.l (cBv)
Gao
I
r"n o'"ia
I LBt
::
fi\1
1 st tru.. of brrd
End b..c. (EBl
tllcrrl(LBc)
Oroithd -
l|r.r.r l|-ttc, group of tru!!c!
End b..cc (E8)
diagonrla (G8O)
t{ote: 2nd ttoo. ry.t.m.h.ll h.v.
adequri. c.prciv to lupporl ground
2d ttoor
t d floor
Typic.l ho.izonlal tic mcmbcr with
muniple d.rc! (HT)
CAUTION: Ground braclng requlred tor all lnstallstlons.
Frame 2
SPAN
M IN IMUM
DEPTH
TOP CHOFO
LATERAL BRACE
SPACTNG(LBs)
TOP CHORO
DIAGONAL BRACE
SPACING (DBS)
[# trusses]
SP/DF SPF/HF
UD lo 32'30"15 10
Over 32 - 48'6',
Over 48' - 60'48'5
Over 60'See a regislered protessional engineer
2x4l2x8 PARALLEL
CHORD TRUSS
Top cho.d! th€l are lalerally braced can buclle
log.ther!nd c!uo€ collap6€ ilthere isnodiaso-
nalbracing. Diagonalbracing 6hould b€ narled
lo ih. undc.aide or the top chord when purlins
rre rttrched to ihe toDside of thc loD chord-
DF - Douglas Fir-Larch
HF - Hem-Fir
SP - Southern Pine
sPF - Spruce-Pine-Fil
G$ti-,,-
'.,-"'
::; f
'.1 30' or
.\ greater
..7-
l.
- The end
diagonal brace
for canlilevered
lfusses musl be
placed on vertical
webs in line with
lhe supporl.
l
End diagonals are esacnlial for
slability and must be duplicaled on
bolh ends ol the lruss system.
Contin uous
Too Chord
Laieral Brace I tl1'
Bequired
'10 or Grealer
^A WARNING: Falture to foltowthese recommendatlons could result ln A,
A severe personat iniury ol damage to trussea or buildlngs. A
4x2 PAFIALLEL CHORD TRUSS:TOP CHORD
Top chordo thal are lalerally braced c3n buckle
logelherand cEu6e co lapoc illher. irno diaqG
nal bracing, Oiagonal br.cing lhould bc nailed
to the underside of lh€ too chord when ourlins
are attached lo lhe lo06ide ol lhe loo chord.
ge\
16 -'
tug"\
All lateral
braces lapped
-
al leasl lwo
lrusaea.
---\
End diagonals are e6senllal tor
stabilily and must be duplicaled on
bolh ends ot lhe truss system.
Continuo us
Top Chord
Lateral Brace , i-1.Flcquired , I
1O' or G reater
Ir'' I --!-.:
Attac h m ent
Req u ired
t-'- - 31/;'
t' --
ll ll ll ll
>_-_a
Trusses must have lum-
ber olientod in the hori-
zontal direction to use
lhis brace spacing.
Frame 5
SPAN
MINIMUM
PITCH
TOP CHORD
DIAGONAL BRACE
SPACTNG (DBs)
[# Irug3e3l
SF/NF SPF/HF
uD to 32'4/12 8',20 15
Ovet 32' - 48'4t12 6',10 7
Over 48' - 60'4t12 5',6 4
OYer 60'see a registered professlonal englneer
All lateral bracee
lapped at least 2
lrusaeg.
DF - DougL. Fh.hch
HF - H6m-FIr
SP. Snhcrn Plm
SPF. Sp.uolPl|r}Fh
PITCHED TRUSS
Topchord, th.trrc |rt.r.lly br.c.d c.n buckl.
togclh.r.ndc.u3ccolllpoo th!.clrnodi.go-
n|l br.cin9. Dirgon.l br.cing.houH b.n.ilcd
lo lh. und..!id. olO|Clop chord rehcn purlin.
..c.ttlchcd to thc lopsidc ol lhc lop chord.
SPAN
TOP CHORD
LATERAL BRACE
SPACTNG(LBs)
TOP CHOBD
DIAGONALBRACE
sPAclNG (DBs)
[# trussesl
SP/DF SPF/HF
UD lo 28'2.5 7'17 12
Over 28' - 42'3-O 6'9 6
Over 42' - 60'3.0 5 5 3
Over 60'See a regislered prolessional engineer
12 5f-
DF - Oougla. Fh-Lr.ch
HF - H.m:Flr
Topcho.drlh6lrre lrtcrElly br6ced c8n buck|!
logcthcr.nd cru!ccolhp.. il ther. iano diago-
n.l b..cing. Diagon.l br.cing ahould b€ nailed
lo rh. undc..idc ol lh.lop chord when purl,n.
.rc .li.ched lo lhe topcide of the top chord.
sctssoRs TRUss
Frame 3
12 - 4 or greater
DF - Douglas Fir-Larch
HF - Hem-Fir
SP - Soulhern Pine
SPF - Spruce-Pine-Fir
All lateral braces
lapped at least 2
trusses.
BOTTOM CHORD PI.ANE
,^-^ oo,\"* a"_
o e;
Bottom chord diagonal bracing repeated
at each end of lhe building and at same
spacing as lop chord diagonal bracing.
-'
SPAN
MINIMUM
PITCH
BOTTOM CHORD
LATERAL BRACE
SPACTNG(LBs)
BOTTOM CHORD
DIAGONAL BRACE
sPAclNG (D85)
[# lrussesl
SPF/HF
Up to 32'4t12 15'20 l<
Over 32'- 48'4t12 15'10 .,
Over 48'- 60'4,12 1s',6
Over 60'See a regislered prolessional engineer
A WARNING: Falluretotoltowtheserecommendationscoutdresultln ^+\A severe personal injury or demage to trusses or buildings. A
Cross bracing repeated
at each end of the
building and at 20'
lntervals.
I WEB MEMBEB PLANE i
Frame 4
I
PE rNs
. PERMIT NUMBER OF/PROJECT
DATE /
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON i TUES
1- i 1
BUILDING: \
ta'
6. FOOTTNGS i SrEEL Qsul, ,l/t-
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH i O.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING D
o
o
o
ROUGH / WATER
r_r BOOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr sHEErFoCt
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
FINAL
D
tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
o
tr
tr
ROUGH o
tr
o
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
FINAL FINAL
IPPROVED
RRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE / - ,-'.1'INSPECTOR
t/,'.'
1- /:;- ' .- -ii --1c
t . B71- aato
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
t
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
8r" s DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
r331
JOB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES
LLl FSTFftAU FJAI
WED THUR
LtP(r€
PM FRI 6p
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER - PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
-
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
6 t4.crts \ De'+r ru*ae
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.
B ROUGH / WATER
tr GAS PIPING
tr
o
o
POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
I reenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
ft il lL
(,.),
\.=7r INSPECTOR
PERMIT NUMBER OEPROJECT {) ,, / ':.
D^rE 0ll( | I JoB NAME
INSPECTION: MON
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
//\AM i PM \."-.-"READY FOR
LOCATION:
------r- _ ., . .i
i lr'.l. ,i/t../'-- .,(1(7. .i,r)t.CALLER i..,:: t ttl- | /.t1. , -.
FOUNDATI
I
ON / STEEL ,''' ,t't , 't.'tti'n A r)) '
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH i D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER O HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
C] FINAL O FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
o /' /2'-)( / -// t OAIE O ,/ /' ,r / '' INSPECTOR
s
(,
N
,y'
t-,,'
REO
VAIL
7r/'1t
ON NOF UEST
\/')
\MO}+--. TUES , WED . , JBUR r1 Ffrr I r AM PM
PERMIT NUM
BUILD!NG:
fl(roorrr.rcs / srEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
tr
tr
tr
o
u
tr
tr
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FHAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
O POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
FINAL
tr
o FINAL
ELECTRIGAL: "-
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
E
o
tr
o
HEATING
tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
tr )PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE 3' 'Y l';INSPECTOR ,/
7
rNstctoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
PERMIT NU
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMEING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNOATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
O POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:MECHANIGAL:
EMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr
o
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL tr FINAL
q APPROVED
GORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
I
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
\d.:r7 c{t
WED --- )Huv -'l=-:\AM (PM )k{<*
ILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
BUILI
trFO
B.FC
trFR
oF[
B INI
OSF
tr_
O GAS PIPING
FOOTINGS / STEEL
OUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
D
T] FINAL E FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
T] TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH o
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
I] FINAL O FINAL
ED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
?t 9!-INSPECTOR
, (- oLlo
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
oor, ?'lf-14 JoB NAME
("s,/,.
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
--@
PM
BUILDING:
T] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
N UNDERGROUND
'tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATEF
T] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
r_.r ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL/ H, TUB
O FINAL
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL _tr FINAL
PROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,/./. , -lrt /.-\ - /)t ^' ,t /.L ,t / ./,.i...
PERMIT NUMEER OF PROJEET
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
' 479-2158
,^//Ll/a/
DATE
; { READY FoR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
WED (
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNOERGROUND
EI ROUGH / D.W.V,
D ROUGH / WATER
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
EPAPPROVED *'.Z\
CORRECTIONS:
-
tr DISAPPBOVEO O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
'-'r- l/t /<^DATE .t t t' INSPECTOR { ,".
#i#ii, o6 :37 *=nu.=,lo*'?ilUoE['Y8i';"fi1'3lE:?=l- z ?,?8,e6
PRGE
AREA: CD
Aetivity: 895-O218 ?/?g/96 Type: B-BUILD Status: ISSUED Constr: NSFR
AddreEs: 1339 GREENHILL CT
Locat i sn: SAltlE
Farcel : 21O3-1E4*03-869
Description: NEtl SFR
Applieant: BEtrK & ASSOCIATES,
Owner: HEUEY CHARLIE
Uontractor: BECK & ASSOCIATES.
Oce: OOOT ljse: U N
INC
INC
Fhone: 3O3949 lBOG
Fhone: 5O8-5€6-7464
Phone: 3O3949 18OG
Inspectli.qn Request Inf orrat ion- . . . .
Requestdrl BRIAN/€ECK & ASSODIATES
Req Ti re: OB:OO Corrents:
Fhone: 949-74?6
IterE requested to be Inspe-e
so53s BLDG-rerp. C/a d, CQ
.- -,.---,1 Caurtem, t-E-. l9t-1 . -E.LYC ^- . -F"i tr] l'lC-.-,---. -
PE .e.t -&!(xrrc'v ..u N(b\-EZ A{AD2ES
Flct i on
.frP
Tire Ex
&aqe*re4--enJ--5-€P.S/ fffi . - (&m.gJtc:1-IiLo:---. -(atui,&.FrE'..r41..113L ' .. _ 1311n:lAE1r,fS _Fvruk_ p-e4dd_Bdl1},e$n+*jArvrS -Fvru<- P-*
COAIKETE_ \,I 4.- \ ----_-----v-----. ,U t_ t utLot rJk,Inspeet ion History..,.. r* '[./c-**--
Iter: OOOlO BLDG-Foot ings./Steel
frE/6I/93 Inspector: DS Action: FI SOUTH l/e ONLY
Iter : OOOEO BLDG-Foundat ion/Steel
OA/13193 Inspeetor: CF Aetion: AtrtrR APFROVED
Iter: SOS?A trLFlN-ILC Site trlan
Le/V3/93 Inspeetor: LAUREN Aetion: AtrPR ILC approved
Iter: OO03O BLDG-Frauinq
lL/29/95 Inspector: CF Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED
Notes: RECEIUED STRUCTURAL.UtrDATES FROM ENE SEE R€UISIONEi FOR FI
INSPECTIONS
l2/OLl95 Inspector: CF Action: NR CAHCELLED
I?/A6/93 Inspector: CF Actisn: fftrCR ApF'ROUED/CORRECTION REOD
Notes: RECEIVED ENG TRLISS FIELD REPORT
GROUT OR STEEL SHIFI FETT.JEEN BOTTOH PLATE AND FOUNDATION A
POINT LOAD LOCATIONS
FIRE BLOCKING RENUIRED AT CEILIHG T}ROPS, SOFFITS AND STAI
STRIN6ERS , trRAI"IL SPACE UENTS REOUIRED
PACH OUT RIM JOIST AT ALL trOINT LOAD LOCATIONS'..
ATTIC ACCESS EEGIUIRED
GRADING REPORT OF LI]E R$IFTERS AND PURLINS
PACK OUT UNDER RAFTEII AT STAIRI.IAY BN UtrPER LEVEL
L?/ tL/95 Inspector-: CD ACtiON: AF.'trR FIOST CORREtrTIDNS ITIADE
Notes: COITIPLETE 6ROUT OR SHIFIS ON ENTFY T.IAI-L NEAR STAIRS
NEED CRADINE REtrORT ON LOGS
Iter: OOA4O * * Not On File * *
Iter: OOOSO BLD6-Insulation
I2/lL/93 Inspector: CD Ac'tion: AtrtrR APFROUED
NOTCS: ADD INSULATION ABOUE WINDOI.I TO RI}II JOISTS
ATTIC INSULRTION I.ITLL BF BI-OT.IN IN LATER
Iter: OBg6fr BlD6-Sheetrock Nail
L?/13/95 Inspeetor: CD Artion: PA FARTIAL APpROUAL
Notes: TOP LEUEL CUfdpLETE BATHROOIII ADD NRILS l.lHFRE trApER IS RIptr
iIIDDLE LEVEL COFIPLETE EXTERIOR I.JALL
CALL FOR REINSPEtrTION FOR BUNH ROOITI AND REST OF HOUSE
Ie/L9/95 Inspector: CD Action: AtrtrR REST COFIPLETE
.ri
ltt | |wflC'
o:ur rthhQ 0$vo9!$f
)lrr-q 1l . )1J{
qq3 k6 \trl,rrvirSQ arg6nt1a .$r/o)tztU
-r:fl t:r 1-rjqnrro) .1*olA €)''rP451 lff+,€ $cYJq rur*,a Zf.hcr$+fift8 ',/*:o' *'o -{$ftl*ffiS
/-7 sNolluto-l snocuuzuH NI g3UInO3H SSU-lft O3u3dt{3t
-.--. H3:l{J rSU3 -1343-r U3dcn NO g3q33N IIUUSNHH
VaffilfJIJ l.f,tuJ U:ld$lUO 3OOll3U
, /- 9NIONU-I UOIU3I}3 INOUIJ lil0 g3UInO3U -lIHUgUUnEt
1 )(J.autnazu suSsHnN 3snoH - c3urntr3u -rurlouddu rd3o gNlNryu.]d oNUlHUot'l Srlcnd
/,aSfEHInO 3n(xd:lu :se+oN
I Itl !-.ral.l.aiaalGllt tE a- trf t =!A
o/3 Iru!J-991S O?SOO 3re+I
g3ulno3u ssnlfirus ol- ss333u
Br3+I :r3lI
gJ !rolradsul g51gp.12g gl !rolcadsul 99711716
93 lrolcadsul 9,6,7912121 'c5lll-gtl.|g g.LuaD :r.+I
* * eM utl +oN * * OB0OO.:la+I
g3tN3g Ng !uo!+:rg / 33 r-rolcadsul g1fgtfgd
trl3 'dra1-991g SESOO
:u3uu
39Ud
rEulJ-gg-ts 96600
3IIS
3UIIN3 UOJ {EI-rddU Stll:ls OJgllS SII3HINAS NOIIUfIS.13 HInOS rsaloN
NOrrS3dSNr 3HIU-I UddU ruoT+iru
lsuS NorrS:tdsNr 3Hru.l uddu !uo!+tu
c3nouddu uddu !uo!lru
sr33HS XUO|rlS3dsNr uoj srs3nB3u zEr90 96tgetet
IEITd3U u3 96/EA/e 3EOJ
oguuo-to3 U6 :fir Nttll
REtrT131
a7 /e6/96 rDZ1, s4, RE'uEsrsCl nT?ilHoEE, Y B,ltmERtBfi eB+r Q* z 7 / E 6t./ s 6 )
l
F,AGE AREAI LP
'Oee: EOOT
Aetivity:
Address:
Far.ce I :
Deseriptionr
Appl icant:
Owner:
Cont ract or :
895-Oet0 7/e6/96 Type: B-BUILD Status: ISSUED
1339 GREENHILL CT
a 143- 1e4-ra3-SrO9
NEW SFR
BECK A ASSOCTATES, INC
HOVEY CHARLIE
BECK & ASS0CIATES| INC
Constr: NSFR
Ure: V N
Fhone: 3O3949 l80O
Fhone : 508-5€6-7464
F,h on e r 3t03949 18OO
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;-;;;;;;;;;;;::. :.
-------;:Fr--------
Requestor: BRIAN BECK AND ASSOC trhonez 949-74?6
Req Tine: O8:tl0 Conmentsr WILL CALL FUBLIC bIORHS FINAL
Itens requested to be Inspeeted. . . Aqt ion CommentE Tine Ex
aar,4o BLDG*Finar C/O AmR cbns= ?.-o-<rj *
Inspect i on History.....
Itern r O0,@lA BLDG-Foot inqs/Steel
0g/0Ll95 Inspector: DS
Item r A60?A BLDG-Foundat ion/Steel
BA/t3/93 Inspecton: CF Itemr 065e0 PLAN-ILC Site Plan
Le/{t3/93 Inepectorr LAUREN
Item l A0,O3A BLDG-Framing
LL/e9/93 Inspeetor: CF Notes: RECEIUED STRUCTURAL
INSPECTIONS
Action: F'I
Act ion: AtrtrR
Action: AtrtrR
Act i on: CR
UF.DATES FROM EN6
Le/6Ll95 Inspeetor: CF Action: NR te/o6/95 Inspector: EF ftction: AtrCR
Notesr RECEIVED ENG TRUS$ FIELD REFURT
GROUT T]R STEEL SHIM BETI^IEEN BOTTOM
POINT LT]AD LOCATION5
FIRE BLOCHING REOUIRED AT CEILING
STRINGERS
CRNWL SPAtrE VENTS REIIUIRED
PACK OUT RIM JOIST RT ALL POINT LT]AD LI]EATIONS
NTTIC ACtrESS REGUIRED
GRADING REtrORT OF LOG RAFTERS AND PURLINS
PACK BUT UNDER RAFTER AT STAIRI.JRY ON UFF'ER LEVEL
le/IL/93 Inspector: CD Action: APtrR MT]ST CORRECTIONS ]IIADE
Notes: COMtrLETE 6ROUT OR SHIMS ON ENTRY WALL NEAR STAIRS
NEED ERADING REtrORT ON,LOGS
SOUTH l/E ONLY
AF,PROUED
l"ILtr approved
PLATE AND .F'T]UNDRTIT}N A
DROFS, SQFFITS AND STAI
Itenr A0A4A * * Not 0n File * *
It em : 46050 BLDG-Insulat i on
LE/tLl9S Inspectorr CD Action:Notes: ADD INSULATIUN ABOVE WINDfIN TO
ATTIC INSULRTION I^'ILL BE BLT]NN
AF.F,R APPROVED I,
RIM JT]ISTS
IN LATER Itemr AAA6O BLDG-Sheetroek Nail
Le/L3195 Inspectorr CD Action: trA FARTIFIL AppHbUAL
Notes: TOF LEVEL COMFLETE BATHROUI! ADD NAILS I.,HERE FAE€R IS RItrp
MIDDLE LEUEL COMF,LETE EXTERIOR t^tflLL , - ;
CALL FOR REINSpECTION FUR BUNK ROUM AND FEST OF HOUSE
Le/19/93 Inspectorr CD Aetion: AF'trR REST COMpLETE
Iten: ftBOB0 * * Not 0n File * * t.
CANCELLED
APtrROUED/CT]RRECTION REOD
REPT131
07/?6/96 l3:31 RE '?HH"PE,Y3I\.,"F1'3[H?* = 7'?6'e6 PA6E
AREA: CD
Activity:
Address:
Parcel:
Descri pt i on :
Appl icant :
Own er:
Contract or:
895-OerO 7l?6/96 Type: B-BUILD Status: ISSUED
1339 GREENHILL CT
e1a3-144-43-OG9
NEI,I SFR
BECR & ASSOCTATES,
HOVEY CHARLIE
BECK & ASSOCIATES,
Constr: NSFR
Use: U N
INC
INC
Occ:
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
o,o,97
30394919OO
569-546-7464
30394919O0
Inspeetion Request Inforration....
Requestor: BRIAN BECK AND ASSUC
Req Tire: Ol:6O Corrents: FINAL
Iters requested to be Inspected...
9A34O BLDG-Final C/O
Inspect ion History... -.
Iter: Ao610 BLDG-Foot ings./Steel
AA|UIlg5 Inspectar: DS
Iter: 6gge0 BLDG-Foundat ion/Steel
6g/L3/95 Inspector: EF
Iter: Ogse0 PLFIN-ILC Site F,Ian
L?/O3/95 Inspector: LAUREN
Iter: 60630 BLDG-Fraring
Fhone: 949-7426
co
Action Corrent s Tire Ex
Action: PI SOUTH
Aetion: APPR AtrPROUED
Aetion: APPR ILC approved
l/E ONLY
Ilf29/93 Inspeetor: CF Action: CR CORRECTION REOUIRED
Notesr RECEIUED STRUCTURAL UtrDATES FROl'l ENG SEE REUISIONS FOR FI
INSPECTIONS
1?/El/95 Inspector: CF Action: NR CANCELLED
L"/ol6/95 Inspector: CF Action: APCF AFPROUED/CORRECTION REOD
Notes: RECEIUED ENG TRUSS FIELD REFORT
EROUT OR STEEL SHII'1 BETI.JEEN BBTTT]M FILATE AND FOUNDATTON A
POINT LOAD LOCATIONS
FIRE BLOCKING REOUIRED AT CETLTNE DROpS, SOFFITS AND STAI
STRINGERS
CRAI.IL SPACE VFNTS REOUIRED
PACK OUT RIITI JOIST AT ALL PtrINT LOAD LOCATIONS
ATTIC ACCESS REOUIRED
GRADING REPORT OF LOG RAFTERS AND PURLINS
trACK OUT UNDER RAFTER AT 5TAIRWAY ON UtrtrER LEVEL
l?lIl/95 Inspector; CD Action: AtrPR MOST CORRECTIONS FIADE
Notes: COI{PLETE GROUT OR SHII{S ON ENTRY I|ALL NEAR STRIRS
NEED GRADING REPORT ON LOGS
Iter: o,BO4g * * Not On File * *
Iter: A6050 BLD6-Insulation
L?/IL/9= Inspector: CD Aetion: AtrtrR ApFRUVED
Notes: ADD INSULATITIN ABOUF WINDOI"| TO RIt'l JOISTS
ATTIC INSULATION I.III-L BE BLOI,JN IN LATER Ite:: Ooo6g BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
L?/L3/53 Inspeetor: ED Action: PA FARTIAL APFROVAL
Notes: TOP LEVEL trOt{trLETE BATHROOM ADD NAILS TJHERE PAFER IS RIpp
TTIIDDLE LEVEL COIYIPLETE EXTERIOR T.IALL
CRLL FOR REINSPECTION FOR BUNK ROOil AND REST OF HOUSE
le/I9/95 Inspector: CD Aet ion: APPR REST COIttpLETE
Iter: BOOSO * * Not On FiIF + *
REtrTtSt TOHN OF VRrL, COLORRDO pf,EE
e7l?6196 l3t3l REtrUESTS FOR INSFECTION IIORK SHEETS FORI 7/?6/96 AREAI CD
Iterr MiTO BLDE-D|irc.
lelilo/95 Inspeetorr EG f,ction; APPR AFFROVED Alflllib Inspcetor: CD Aetion: AtrtrR LATI{E II{SPECTION EAST SI JE/OS|96 Inspcctor: CD Actionr APPR LATI{E INSFECTItI{Notes! STITJTH ELEUATION SYNTHETIC STUCCO BEING APH-IEDI FOR ENTIRE
SITE Iterr OOO9O BLDG-Final Itcrr OO53O BLD6-Terp. ClO rnell5f96 Inspeetor: CF Aetion: IIN DENIED
Notcsr REI{}VE tlttTHtruSE
PT'8LIC }T'RKS END PLANNING DEPT APFROUf,L REOUIRED
HII"J6€ T{..|iIBERS REtrUIRED
EUARDRAIL REOUIRED ON FRONT EXTERIOR LANDING
REI{OUE DAI{PER FROiI FIREPLRCE
HANDRRIL NEEDED ON UPPER LEVEL EAST DECK
TEiItrERED ELASS REEUIRED IN HAZARDOUS LTICATITII{S
RCCESS TO BATHTUBS REAUIRED
6e/?A/56 lnspeetor: CD Actionr APPR AFPRUUED Notrsr UNCOVER SIIOKE DETECTORS
COSiIETICS NOT COI'IPLETE IN ALL BAT}IRO{IIIs OR TI{E zuILDII€
INSTALL EXI{AIJST DIET TO C-I-T}THES DRYER
trUBI-IC I{TRKS ATTID PLANNIiIG HAVE GIUEN UERBAL MPROUAL ALL
IITFINISI{ED EXTERIOR }IORK HAS BEEN BONDED Iter: ldle4o Bl-DG-Final ClO
\rf c ( cG5{,( iler4 ? \N s{7f hq i rJ trrrr,ffiFf,)
- fgvivrg-6' |tt-Nttrt t c \N
Ub $.lr,b$o^r P
*
.=g'
+3
d
I
t I t
tl
i x
5
E o 6.
I
I
I
I
C,
,g
T
5 x bI
I
s
$1).
CT]ECK REQUEST
ffi._. lzetu pN?, Z/az
VENDOR NAT'18:'zn.-.4-
VENDOR NU]'IBER:
DESCRIPTION OF EXFENSE: 1/424-zz-.t
Z.-4)NAME CF JOB:
ACCOUNT' NIj]"1BER:// aaaa a-?aa:
AMOUIIT OF REFUND "25?.A)
DATE APPROVED:
APPROVAI, SIGNATUF.E:
e fll l't
FT alr Ft
-0 f.l g
a+\rv
tl Ht
a \E'n f.l
-H t g
a+
-|-t
lF \-
GI tl ts ts H a+
-,^tq E9 f'{t
E4 gl
rrlf
fra
H
fi
-
-t f-v
-r F
-rEl
H r!|
'}?
2a n f.+
-?F
f!|t
-|.+
i<-_i +;;.__...:i
=: -:- :
=;=^=^^Z--.::=-i-:
^ \-/ --.i -:t{l >ii=
hA-:-z!ai
-7,<o:I
i":'.:s=:e
': r._Cr9 <;:
-.ni >=o ::- -^.>-.';->--:
=-=>.-,:_..j
Z f 'C
*-,F a- '..i ==E>;-\=Y32 z::i A..-w:.,t^
a'\-w
z;=
= "-=7Z<-,^Z -: a -::
.^>v .'s<:I=
^"lt ..<>
--':A !- -'j !r Kro
z
I z
7=
= -t
t.
a-
=
c-c-
?
l*
lLr)It,
l-
lz
lf-{IF
iF
ls
lH
l.
1F
1H
i
it+lb
ti4 t>
iE,
l?ErgE
iSiiFF
iiiiEi
[;EilFi
5s=*X
IFiEH -igF.E
r!z
a
=
Ir,r
i
FI
Fl l.).nts
K '-
o
a ;a
:
I
I
I
I
a rll E
I
F4 ri a
t-r
F tr tr t:K
I F t;('.n
u
z
t-:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fifth on the agenda was Resolutiont, Series of 1996, a Resotution ,"n"tn Lion's Ridge Court to Gtacier Court. MayorArmour read the title in full and George Ruther reviewed details, exptiining that t[e propeny owners on Lion's Ridge Court had requested a change of lhe name from Lion's Ridge CJurt to Giacier iourt, as evidenced by a petition signed by all of the property owners on Lion's Ridge Court. George further stated that Staff found the applicant's request reasonable, and recommended the appro--val of Resolution No. g, Series of 1g96.Pat Dauphinais, one of the two property owners was present to answer any questions.
A motion was made by Sybill lo approve Resolution No. 8, Series of 1996, and Ludwig seconded the motion. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
It91 No' Six on the agenda was the appointment_of two Local Licensing Authority Members. Town Clerk, Holly McCutcheon presented the item and requested Council appoint two inlividuals io fill the expiring terms of Don White and Connie Knight. Don White and Connie Knight had both submitted letters for reappointment by the published deadline and no other letters were submitted. Ballots were then distributed to council members, and voted. Holly then tallied the votes and presented the results to Mayor Armour. Sybill moved to reappoint Don White and Connie Knight to serve new terms, due to expire June, 1d98. Rob Ford seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 7-0. Mayor Armour thanked the two for their continued service.
Seventh on the agenda was an appeal of the Planning & Environmental Commission,s (pEC) denial of a request for a height variance to allow for a residence, curently under construclion, to exceed'the 33-foot height
limitation for residential structures. The project is located at 133b Westhaven Circle/ Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD #4). Applicant: Bill Anderson representing Mr. and Mrs. Hovey. Dominic Mauriello presented the item and provided council members with the following background: On January B, 1996 the pEi unanimously denied a similar request for a building height variance for the structure. The denial was appealed to Council on January 6, '1996. The council failed to pass a motion to either uphold or overturn the pEi decision, therefore the pEC
decision was automatically upheld. On May 1 3, 1996, the PEC denied another request for the same variance, and the applicant was appealing that denial. Dominic stated the applicant was in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and that the lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) submitteO Uy the applicant indicated that sections of three separate roof ridges were constructed at heights exceeding the 33-foot maximum height allowance for residential structures. The ridge height figures provided by Eagle Valley Surveying,s ILC were constructed a maximum of I inches above the 33-foot niignt attowance. The'appiicant's requested that the PEC grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges at the exiiting, constructed neigfrts.
Dominic stated lhe applicant believed that the Town's topographic survey policy allows for a one foot variation in existing elevation and that if given a one foot variation the building would be within the height limitations. The Town's policy did not allow variations in building height, and now iequire a spot elevation under proposed roof elevations prior to the site being disturbed. In this particular case, Dominic stated, the building height problem
resulted from the addition of heated floors and not from a survey error, and that it was the Staffsiecommendation to deny the applicant's request lo overturn the pEC decision.
Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead explained that because there was a 3-3 vote, the pEC decision stood, as there must be a majorily vote. Bob Armour guestioned why the issue was once again before Council, and if one could appeal time after time. Tom said there was no limit on the number of-times an applicant could submit an application for a variance and appeal.
Dave Peal stated there were new issues that had come to light, concerning the accuracy of the lmprovement Location Certificate and the actual topo, and that the nationaistandard allowed tor a 1,plus or minus tolerance based on 2 foot contours, and Dan Corcoran, professional land surveyor, explained the discrepancy in detail. He also stated he was here on his own, not at anyone's request or payment.
Discussion continued regarding the construction process, changing plans, and the Town's new survey policies
which went into effect March 28, 1996.
Paul moved to overturn the PF.C decision, and Sybill seconded the motion. A vote was taken and was defeated,3 - 4, Rob Ford, Kevin Foley, Bob Armour and Ludwig Kurz voting in opposition.
Dave Peel then presented Council with an improved design solution, and paul Johnston moved to allow the applicant to modify two of the three roof ridges, as presented in the improved design solution. Kevin Foley seconded the motion. A vole was taken and passed,4-3, Rob Ford. Svbill Navas. jnct Bob Armnrrrvdtinn in
opposition.
Item No. Eight-on the aSgn!1y9s an appeal of the PEC Oeni"i ot " ,uqr""t for a Oensity variance to allow for the construction of additional GRFAwithin an existing primary/secondary residence, locited at 3130 Booth Falls CourUUnit B, Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing. Applicant: Brent ind Barbara Bingham.
Dominic Mauriello provided Council with the following background: In November of 1995, an inspection of the residence revealed a vaulted area had been converted to GRFA without a building permit. The additional GRFA was in excess of that perlilt9d by the Zoning Code. on November 20, 1995, th-e appellants were sent a letter stating that the addilional GRFA must be removed. The appellants then decided to apply for a density variance to allow the additional GRFA. On May 13, 1996, the PEC denied the density variance request (3-1-1) finding that the granting of the variance would be a grant of special privilege. The appellants were appealing that denial.
vs'l Town co(lrEl Evrfino Mr.lng M|'tr,t.3 Jwr 4. 1996
Fifth on the agenda *"" n"rotr#ruo. 8, series of 199G, a Resotution r'!;-"r,nn Lion's Ridge Court to Gtacier
Court. MayorArmour read the title in full and George Rulher reviewed details, explaining that the property owners
on Lion's Ridge Court had requested a change of the name from Lion's Ridge Court to Glacier Court, as
evidenced by a petition signed by all of the property owners on Lion's Ridge Court. George further stated lhat Staff
found the applicant's request reasonable, and recommended the approval of Resolution No. 8, Series of 1996.
Pat Dauphinais, one of the two property owners was present to answer any questions.
A motion was made by Sybill to approve Resolution No. B, Series of 1996, and Ludwig seconded the motion. A
vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. Six on the agenda was lhe appointment of two Local Licensing Authority Members. Town Clerk, Holly
McCutcheon presented the item and requested Council appoint two individuals to fill the expiring terms of Don
White and Connie Knight. Don \Mite and Connie Knight had both submitted letters for reappointment by the
published deadline and no other letters were submitted. Ballots were then distributed to council members, and
voted. Holly then tallied the votes and presented the results to Mayor Armour. Sybill moved to reappoint Don
White and Connie Knight to serve new terms, due to expire June, 1998. Rob Ford seconded the motion. A vote
was then taken and passed unanimously, 7-0. Mayor Armour thanked the two for their continued service.
Seventh on the agenda was an appeal of the Planning & Environmental Commission's (PEC) denial of
a request for a height variance to allow for a residence, currently under construction, to exceed the 33-foot height
limitation for residential structures. The project is located at 1339 Westhaven Circle/ Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision
(SDD #4). Applicant: Bill Anderson representing Mr. and Mrs. Hovey. Dominic Mauriello presented the item and
provided council members with the following background: On January 8, 1996 the PEC unanimously denied a
similar request for a building height variance for the structure. The denial was appealed to Council on January
6, 1996. The council failed to pass a motion to either uphold or overturn the PEC decision, therefore the PEC
decision was automatically upheld. On May 13, 1996, the PEC denied another request forthe same variance, and
the applicant was appealing that denial. Dominic stated the applicant was in the process of constructing a
residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and that the lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) submitted by the
applicant indicated that sections of three separate roof ridges were constructed at heights exceeding the 33-foot
maximum height allowance for residential structures. The ridge height figures provided by Eagle Valley Surveying's
ILC were constructed a maximum of 8 inches above the 33-foot height allowance. The applicant's requested that
the PEC grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges at the existing, constructed heights.
Dominic stated the applicant believed that the Town's topographic survey policy allows for a one foot variation in
existing elevation and that if given a one foot variation the building would be within the height limitations. The
Town's policy did not allow variations in building height, and now require a spot elevation under proposed roof
elevations prior to the site being disturbed. In this particular case, Dominic staled, the building height problem
resulted from the addition of heated floors and not from a survey error, and that it was the Staffs recommendation
to deny the applicant's request to overturn the PEC decision.
Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead explained that because there was a 3-3 vote, the PEC decision stood, as there
must be a majority vote. Bob Armour questioned why the issue was once again before Council, and if one could
appeal time after time. Tom said there was no limit on the number of times an applicant could submit an
application for a variance and appeal.
Dave Peal stated there were new issues that had come to light, concerning the accuracy of the lmprovement
Localion Certificate and the actual topo, and that the national standard allowed for a 1'plus or minus tolerance
based on 2 foot contours, and Dan Corcoran, professional land surveyor, explained the discrepancy in detail. He
also stated he was here on his own, not at anyone's request or payment.
Discussion continued regarding the construction process, changing plans, and the Town's new survey policies
which went into effect March 28, 1996.
Paul moved to overtum the PEC decision, and Sybill seconded the motion. A vote was taken and was defeated,
3 - 4, Rob Ford, Kevin Foley, Bob Armour and Ludwig Kuz voting in opposition.
Dave Peel then presented Council with an improved design solution, and Paul Johnston moved to allow the
applicant to modify two of the three roof ridges, as presented in the improved design solution. Kevin Foley
seconded the motion. A vote was taken and passed, 4-3, Rob Ford, Svbill Navas. and Bob Armorrr voting in
opposition.
Item No. Eight on the agenda was an appeal of the PEC denial of a request for a density variance to allow for the
construction of additional GRFA within an existing primary/secondary residence, located at 3130 Booth Falls
CourUUnit B, Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing. Applicant: Brent and Barbara Bingham.
Dominic Mauriello provided Council with the following background: In November of 1995, an inspection of the
residence revealed a vaulted area had been converted to GRFA without a building permit. The additional GRFA
was in excess of that permitted by the Zoning Code. On November 20, 1995, the appellants were sent a letter
stating that the additional GRFA must be removed. The appellants then decided to apply for a density variance
to allow the additional GRFA. On May 13, 1996, the PEC denied the density variance request (3-1 -1) finding that
the granting of the variance would be a grant of special privilege. The appellants were appealing that denial.
Vail Tdrn Corrndl Etlnirlg M€€ti rg Mirul63 JurF 4. tfr95
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
June 4, 1996
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, June 4, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:30 p.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Kevin Foley
Mike Jewett
Paul Johnston
Ludwig Kurz
Sybill Navas
Rob Ford
MEMBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation, Vail resident, Bill Wlto distributed photos showing an array of newspaper boxes in the Village core and suggested the town work to improve the presentation of diipensers'.
Next, Fred Lutz, new area manager for TCI cablevision of the Rockies introduced himself and TCI's technical manager, Mark Graves, to council members.
Item number two on the agenda was the Consent Agenda which consisted of the approval of the Minutes for the meetings of May 7 and 21 ,1996. Town Clerk, Holly McCutcheon distributed revised minutes for the May 21 meeting and Paul Johnston moved to approve the Consent Agenda, with a second by Sybill Navas. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Tltifg oit the agenda was Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance creating Section 17.32.050, Plat Title Formats, and amending Sections 17.16.130C, Final Plit-requirements anJ procedure sn6 17.22.030, Condominium and Townhouse Plats-submittal requirements, of the io*nEV"if fvf'uniclpat CoOe.Mayor Armour'read the title in full and Town of Vail Planner, George Ruthir, presented the following background:The Community Development Department was proposing three amendments to Chapter.li, subdivision Regulations and Construction Design Standards, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. The amendments propose to include Plat Title Formats. as Section 17 .32.050 and to amend Sections 1 7.'16. 130C, Final plat-requiiements
and orocedure and 17.22.030, Condominium and Townhouse Plats-submittal requiremEiii-Tire purpose of amending Chapter 17 was to define a standard formal for plat titles in the Town of Vail and modify the requirements and procedure. Staff felt that the creation of a standard format for all plat tifles would help ,edu""past inconsistencies which have caused indexing. and referencing problems for ihe Town of Vail and Eagle County. George informed council members that on Apnl22, the PEChad voted unanimously 1+-O; to recommend approval of the proposed amendments to Chapter 17 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Sybill Navas moved to approve Ordinance 12, Series of 1996 on first reading and the motion was seconded by Kevin Foley. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
Agenda item number four was Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance amending Title 18 Zoning, Chapters 18.12 (Two-Family Residential (R) District), 18.13 (primary/Secondary Residelntial District, 18.54 (Design Review), 18.56 (Environmental lmpact Reports), 18.58 (Supplemental nejutations;, ta.OO (Conditional Use Permits), 18.62 (Variances), and 18.66 (Administration) with'iespect to Adhinistration and Appeals Procedure of the Vail Municipal Code. Town Planner, Dominic Mauriello, presented the item, anct gave the following history; At a meeting of the Town Council on May 21, 1996, Council tabled Ordinance No. 7 on second reading in order for staff to make some revisions to the ordinance. Concern was raised by Council regarding the language included in the provision for g je9. The languagc had been modified to reflect the changes proposed by Council. Concerns were raised bv Art Abplanalp over the use of thc wnrds 'apncltee" and .r.equist'
and also about the listing of adjacent property owners. The word "appellee" had been replaced with the word "appellant" and the word 'request" had been replaced with the word "appeal" throughout the'orOinance. Staff felt that the amount of time required to assemble a list of adjacent property owners was acceptable, and that such lists rarely exceed 7 names and addresses. Dominic then stated that staff recommended approvil of Ordinance No.7, Series of 1996, on second reading. Art Abplanalp applauded Council and staff for their willingness to listen to and incorporate suggestions, but stated he still had concerns. Those concems were discussed in ietail and council members made several suggestions.
Paul Johnston moved to approve Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1996 on second reading, incorporating changes as discussed, Rob Ford seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and passed uninimousfy, Z-0.
Veil Tovrn Council €wdng Mo€ting Minuts! Juns4.1996
Project Application
Project Name:
Proiect Description: fte,
ftL', lfar,
ContEtt Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot J3 arocr u/r* , rrtins 6len LVu^ th. , Tons S Dg.
Comments:
Design Review Board
Molion by:
o^" 6/ rt/t L
DISAPPROVAL
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
Su mmary:
( strrr Approvat
J
N.s
N s
#
R
s s
F
\-
N
$, $€
),>* N-Y
=J,-sE
Wr
\Vs N€-: s
LS
:NE
N s
S €$(\+-ls
$.sr +$
Ex
s-$R.S
NS
N}
RN.
o
o
)
il
€$s-\+.y
+N
ES
SF
RN.
fr
pee/langenwalter architects, l.l.c,
david nrark peel, a.i.a.
kathy langenwalter, a,i.a.
25BB arosa drive
p.o. box 1202
vail, m 81658
9704764506
9704764572 ldx
January 29,1996
Mr. Randy Stouder
COMMLINITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Hovey Residence Height Encroachment
Lot23, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Dear Randy:
Thank you for meeting with rne on Friday, January 26th, to discuss the Hovey Residence
ridge line encroachments. Per the calculations determined at that meeting, it is our
understanding that the following horizontal ridge line distances will be considered as the
final and "official" distances to bc revised in order to bring the building hcight into
conformance with Town of Vail regulations.
l. THIRD FLOOR DORMER (Reference the original Improvement Location
Certificate ridge line elevation 8147.1 and Item A of the PEC variance submittal
dated l2-11-95.) Lowering the ridge as rcquired from the north gable peak a
horizontal distance of 4'-6" will bring the ridge line into conformance.
THIRD FLOOR HIP RIDGE (ILC elevation 8 149.1 and PEC variance Item B')
Installing an exterior chimney as requircd to sliminate the cxisting encroachment for
a horizontal distance of4'-0" along the ftorizontal ridge and 2'-0" horizontally along
the north facing 6:12 roof pitch (total distance of 6'-0") will bring the ridge line into
conformance.
THIRD FLOOR I{IGHEST RIDGE (ILC elevation 8150.1 and PEC variancc Item
C.) Lowering the ridge as requircd from the north gable peak a horizontal distance of
3'-9" will bring the ridge line into conformancc. (NOTE: The vertical encroaclunent
distance for this ridge shall be determined to be from the ridge height vertical
distLance of 33.51' as previously approved by the Town of Vail.)
At your request, these horizontal distances are to be confirmed by a licensed surveyor at the
time of the revised Improvement Location Certificate. The method of confirmation shall be
by accepted surveying standards and procedures. I have spoken with Mr. Mike Post of
Eagle Valley Surveying (prepared original ILC) and one potential method may be by
determining the ridge length prior to the revisions and then confirming them after the revised
construction,
Prior to proceeding with the construction revisions and a revised ILC, a drawing will be
provided to your office illustating the above items and revising the Design Review Board
submittal drawing dated 1-18-96.
If we do not receive a written response from your office within ten days, we will consider
the dimensions discussed above to be acceptable to the Community Devclopment
Department and the Town of Vail. Again, thank you for your time and consideration
Yours truly,ow@;
David M. Peel, AIA "
PEEL/LANGENWALTER ARCHITECTS. L.L.C.
cc: IvIr. Bill Anderson, Beck and Associates, Inc.
Mr. Mike Post, Eagle Valley Surveying,Inc.
..:,-- " /1 ' .*{,-v i,l3 ;\
::*f '
lfo
)Kl w ffi
t@'
-lg -"
lF
r.rt.d, rlLTl'a
DESIGN R.ElltEW BOAID APPIJICATfON . TOI{N OF VAIIT, COIJO8iDO
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
ttt**t***i
INCOMPI]ETE APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE SCHEDUI,ED FOR REVIE {.
B, TYPE OF REVIEW:
A.
-New
conscruct,ion ($2O0.Oo) AJnino, Alseracion Adclition ($50.00)
-Conceptual
Review
ADDRsss: wm l/t'i4q\wn luolo
($20.00)
($0)
Block I,EGAI, DESCRIPT
Subdivi s ion
E.
F APPLICANT:
Address:
Phone
NAME OF OWNER(S):
Condominium Approva 1 if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are Lo be paid aL the
t.ime of subni t, !a1 of C,he DRB applicaLion. LaLer, when
applying for a buil.ding permiL, please identify the accurale
valuat.ion of the proposal . The Town of vail will adjust lbe fee according Lo Ehe EabLe below, to ensure Lhe correc! fee is paid.
FEE PAfD: 3
>K
I.
J.
CIIECR $: DATE: BY:
FEE SCHEDUIJE:
VAIJUATION $ 0 $ 10,000
$10,001 -$ s0,000
$so,oo1 -$ lso,ooo
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000 $ over $1,000, 000
DESIGN R"ETI"IEW BOAAD APPROVAI/ E:KPIRBS
APPROVAL I'NIJESS A BUIIJDING PERMIT IS
IS STARTSD.
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$500.00
ONE Y&AR AFTBR FINAIJ
ISSUBD }IVD CONSTRUCTION
PROiIECT INFORMATION:
If property is described by a neeLs and bounds 1e9al,
descripLion, please provide on a separaLe sheeb and aEtach
Eo rhis applicaLion. twt+,Aeol' ,
ZONING:
NAI.{E OF
Mailing
APPITICAEONS WIIIL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OHNER' S SfGilAfgRE
o
I{AME OF PROJECTI
IJEGAIJ DESCRIPTION: LOT
STREET ADDRESSI
Tbe following infornaEion is
Review Board before a finat
IJIST OF UATBRIAIJS
reguired
approval
A. BUIIJDINC IIATB&LALTS:
Roof
Siding
Other wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window frin
MATERIAII
n"a^nffi^l
COIOR
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck
Flues
Fl,asbings
chinneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
RetainiDg vtalls
Ext,erior IJighting
Other
lI|lDSCeprNc:
W'
--Rai l.g
Designer I
Phone:
IVISION
for submiLlal Lo Che Design
can be given;
B.Nane of N.A,
o
,/ peeytangenwalterarchitects,l.l.c.
david rnerk peel, a.i.a.
kathy langenwalter, a.i.a.
2588 arosa drive
p.o. box 1202
vail, co Bl65B
9704764506
97047G4.572 tax
.Telecopier Tronsmittol Sheet
--1
Number of eog"r, 2iYA'M
To
ComponyS
FAX Number,
From
FAX Number, 303-476-4572
Remorks:
ft,r;;
.{- 1e-?6 THU BIG DUG PARTNERS
srrlt.{ utrlt{
DEsrOl| &tVIEr EOAII App&IgrTf()tf - rgWN gI yAILf COITQ(IDO
DAEE RECEIVEDI
DATE OF DRA MEEEINC:aallratfaa
P4OrMr rNpOnuaTdPN;
LEOA! DE9CRIPTJ9NI . Lob
Eubdivl slon
TXPE OF REVIEIIT:
--N6!r conFtrucBion (0100.001 _\urnor A1lorilElon (S20.u0)
--.aitdl.tlon
(050.00) :concepbuar Aeview'ifOi--'
ADDREso! -lq% l^fiqlrruw1.fuolo . . ". ,,
B.
tr.
A.
c.
D.
F
F
If property ls described by deao-rlpllon, p16a9e provld-e
:l1ock lj/- -
anrl bouudt IcAuI
araLe 6hee[ snd aLtach
,&wr(J
FEE , | 20.00 I s0.00
t1,00.00
$200.00
f{00.00
f500,00
Oltl YlAi. I\F[88 !$tA!I88g!D Ar|D CONST8,SCTION
a m€tlt onas Uo thls appllcaclgn,
ZONTNG:
NA}iE OF
l.tatLtng
APPLICN{!:
Address:
H.
NAME OF
AaP&'rca'ro,vd rfiLb Nor DE FnogrgsSp fttTfiaw ow4.,s ,gJG|tfunE
J.
Condom{nlum App-eval if appticrble.
DRE tEEr DRE fses, es. ohown abover ore to ba pald c,L qus tLne of subrnlreat of, the ens iepiiol.ioil rra,Ger, wh€g Epplylne tor a butrdlig_ge.,n1li-gie"sj-ii"nrrfy Ehe accurst€varuarron or .he proootai. rrri iown-ir-iiri-wiri idjdr-fi;lea accordlns [o the-raUie bll6w,-i6 Eirris bhe serrect, f€e ld Dald.
FEE EC.V4pUr.p!
VAI{UATION
fro,ool .l 13;333
ilililli
' i,,iff,lli | over f1 ,0OO,0OO
glllgll ruvrEr EoAnD AppRovA! Expr!,E8 llF!9yl!_rn{rlrs A BurLDrNo- prnriii-Ii rs gtA8,rED.
NAI'{E Ot OWNER(g)
Dpdrnd,l/lZD6
Wn4\44li/A O lo'4|- 68
^*t*'i* *"-AptL l4 ls6._
'ftt 3'9' fla.rl teot.
ot A?rucANT C)Il. cFttl_Decl lpd,_Assoc!.rl*:: !c,
psclttrsrwaoerr-lj$-lca0Aiai 1 ? itili
----::7;---: --. .
arrmarroNron dvAnhNcE ll.ly '
'r,.,,ilii$l,
ui il
ffiryrgAr.RFOR.\rArroN
Ir'os: Ll 8r d..tt rtno .rgLgf,!,6
!
i ll'ir i
rUr grottduro i.l rquircd fu uy px BRrErDEsca,mroN**"J TS-
B.
c.
aDDRIiss P.O- to; l03O ----'--*-" - ' rsoNnt9]oltl&lso
qu'r,sr6ffi,ap_ l!!1, Colorrrto 0165S
D IiIArrG oF OwlGs,(g (t}I. qlr[)_qry ild
OVNER{S)
ADDRE33 0loodbolr fload
cgy,sr^razg' bnc.Es!e+.f1:sgq9t! 0t t
$rooATrolroF ?RCrSogAL:_ jls ftmn gDdivisiqr (htl, Golondol
ruljl*-"Ist*-!L
-_Fon*r_ro !o:Attl Cr Olen ttto Bpler tctr.
srREEr^DDnEss l3.ll9 le*fnuGn Ctrtt!
clrY,srfi4zrq Yrll, colo|"do 8l6sz
ItrlE
rrso.oo r^nZQ, o-D.csrill?---" *
Th.. f6 rn,'r 6 pa;tr brfa. OG C@$rty Dwdopom egdool rnll rosqu 111ypq6^1
qt sur69
583NI81Ja - b-iie- 5t e- tt: 3 i riHl.-'9a:- T t:uiu
v,
*aqo4ooaeae@macofrltFrr{rtrlilr,_drorhr$}jrtrl:rastyD{cIIlDINc pRoTIB.TyREHIND At{DAcRosssrRriBrr.alrlrcorr!&;;;;iifs-",idrK rm^trl.rs Mrw[.L}r}inEspoNsrtsllroR oonxlrir lUguIINc ADDtEtSBe
g\EttPII'rc$TlOn cot8BmtcE
ADt!.qDp|r(lltqt c6fqqcc *ih r uhrring.eCtmbrr.b-rtrullyr*ollrrr.olcdto daroiooif ayar$n nf inf(tE im hrfgc* No rpglirrlm will bc rocqroit rntcl iib oqrlao6r *foAo O ii&i" ro{,rl{ qy q. TErq fltr hi{rdor} tr irtbo Tptlr;Ert rtrDddtrltly to D{N r {DdlrDH ylthlt o rifro naa.ri rtor oOiriiU,rriaina r"frnoJ. - )
$ tqr,Er'IAr - r\r,oRrt^$toN
9illAsgglqEgilr'AYsnl(tr^'IlAlJ,,iffiitr'is'5r-,iffiovmm$rhBcy,MpnErrwmrr.rBFoRr!A BI''IDING ITITIIIIT IE ISgtND.
Lor -z:af , ,- ,.ro,-,
75 South Frontage Road
VaiI, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8/479-2 I 39
FAX 970-479-2452
D eparnnent of Conmunity Development
May 14, 1996
Bill Anderson
P. O. Box 4030
Vail. CO 81658
RE: A request for a building height variance to allow for a residence currcntly under
construction to excccd the hcight limitations ofthc zoning ordinancc for a residence
located at 1339 Westhaven Circle.
Dear Mr. Andcrson:
The Planning and Environmental Commission at thcir May 13, 1996 meeting denied the Hovey's
request for a variance. The Board found that the granting of such a request would constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with thc limitations on other propcrties classified in the same
district, that the sfiict and literal interprctation or cnforccment of thc spccified regulation would
not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent tvith the objectives
of this title, and the sffict interpretation and enforccment of the spccified regulation would not
deprive the applicants of privileges enjoyed by the owncrs of other properties in the same district.
Please be arvare that you have tcn (10) days from the date ofthis decision to file an appeal in
writing with the Town of Vail. If you have any qucstions plcasc feel frec to call me at 479-2148.
Sincerely,
0S{.,tc^.{i'
Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP
Town Planner
{S *r"r"rro r.urr
t
FILE COr ,
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970479-2452
Department of Communiry Development
'I.
June 10, 1996
Mr. Bill Anderson
Beck and Associates
P.O. Box 4030
Vail. CO 81658
RE: Hovey Residence height encroachment and appeal approvavlnt 23, Glen Lyon Sub.
Dear Bill:
Ar rhe June 4, 1996, the Town Council modified the Planning and Environmental Commission denial ofa height
-
variance for tigee ridges at rlre above referenced property. ihe modification allows the middle ridge @) to remain as
consfiucted. houeter-the remaining ridges (e g O ;nusi Ue cut back to meet the height limitations-
I have also approved the revised plan and DRB application you have submitted to modifr these roofridges. It is
-
undcrsood ririt based on previoG interpreationi and approvals for this residence, tlut ridge C.(the highcst rid.gd g
have a height of33.51'. This was approvcd due to tbe Jnevious interpolations ofthe topographic survey made by ouers
in the Community Development Dcpartnent
Please provide a revised ILC showing the ridges in compliance rvith the variance approval.
Ifyou have any quesions, call me at 479-2148.
Town Planner
{gun*oruu
J
\s
N
s
$(
t,
!
itllllli
i,l1r
lll
I,
:i
TT rl il
s
'S o-*'\ -{-
N\\$sr
+F
Ex
sc
SF
S=RN
<lr <l-So
ur 0E
E*H
aEE aE
o.
cc ut z
3 o.
ui
E o
o
arlIAcnn PtoPEnT! oItrERs ffi Lot 23, Gleo Lyol Subdtv.
1339 WeEthaven Clrcle Vall' Colorado
IOf 14 (1350 Greenhlll Court):
II}T 1.5 (l33tl Greenhrll Gourt):
L.0t t6 (1320 Greenhill Court):
Un lE (1359 Greenhtll Courr)l
loP 22 (1380 l{esthaven Clrcle)c
24 (1319 Uesthaven Circle):
Ed and Glorln Hlc.ks
3026 South Padre feLand Drlve
Corpus Chrtsti, Teras 78415
UNIT A
Ultchell and !4ary
375 Cheetnut
lfinnetka, IIII-note
I'IIIT B
Fftc-H-err J. Kerltn
375 Cheetnut
llolf .Ksrlin
60093
and Maty L,oIf Rarltn
l{inuetka, Illtnols 60093
IJI{IT A
Jeffery ll. and Sal1y Helms Horn
599 Soda Creek Drive
Evergreen, Coloredo 80439
UNIT B
AJlen and Janet
1320 Greenhll1 Yall, Colorado
UI{IT I8_E
Rlchard ll. and Ju11e L. Helster
4015 f,enoYer Street
llalLas, Texae 75225
u?{$.4
Sf,even A. and Corlnne Saldanha
72O2 Aytshlre land
Bocs Ratoa. Florida 33496-1418
UTfII B
Phtllp A. aarl UarJorle OrDeen
Ihoas D. and Sereh Gleaaon
2209 Cregr Lane
l,fclean, Vlrglola 22101
}(.IL Developneat
P.O. Box 3451
Val1, Colorado 81658
Town of Vsll, Col orado
Gerstenberger
Court
81657
urT
TRACT B:
L {-4tw
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
May 13, 1996
A request for a building height variance to allow for a residence, currently
undei construction, to-exce-ed the height limitations of the Zoning
Ordinance. The residence is locatedit 1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23'
Glen Lyon SuMivision (SDD#4).
Applicant: Bill Anderson, representing Mr. & Mrs' Hovey
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
FILE COPY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I. DESCRIPTION OFTHE REOUEST
The appticanr is in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen LYon 9-lF_':lli9l ^,ffie triiirovement Locdtion Certificate (lLC) submined by the applicant indicates that sections ot
mree "i:pir"t"
roof ridges were constructed at heights gxceeOqg. the.33{oot heighl limitation for
structures construdedln the Primary/Secondary Zone District. The ridges in question are
taOeteO A, B and C, starting at the lowest ot the ridges and going up to the highest (see the
attached elevation drawing-). According to the interpolated existing grades provided by. . ,
lntermounAin Engineering"ibased on tie originaltopographic survey), and the ridge height ^
iigrr"Jprouioed 6y Eagte-vitiey Surveying dt-C).riiges A, B a1d 9.*?t. constructed up to 8
inines iiigrrer maritnelg-toot lieight timititibn. 'The
applicant is claiming that the revised
.Survey Folicies" (attached) of the'Town would allow the constructed building height. Staff
believes the revised policies would have no etlect on the constructed building height. The
afplicant is requesiing a variance to retain the roof ridges at the_constructed heights.
Thus, the applicant is iequesting a variance of 8 inches, to the 3s'foot height limitation.
II. BACKGROUND
On January 8, 1996, the PEC unanimously denied the same request for a bulldlng height
variancs. ine pgC decision was appealed to the Town Council. On January 16, 1996'^the
Town Gouncil failed to pass a motion to either uphold or overturn the decision of the PEC' and
therelore the PEC decilion of denial stands. Th'e PEC and Council minutes are attached.
III. CRITERIAANDFINDINGS
Upon review of the Criteria and Findings for variances, contained in Section 18.62'060 of the Vail
lrl'unicipat Code, the Community Deveiopment Department recommends denial of the requested
height variance based on the following factors:
A.Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existlng or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
The requested variance will have little or no impact on adiacent properties
andstructures.Theportionso|roofridgesthatexceed33leetare
minimal. All of the iiJges are up to I in6hes over the 33-foot limitation, for
a length of less than 5 lineal feet'
2. The degree to which reliet from the strict and literal Intsrprotatlon and
enforodment of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve-
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to atiain thaobiectives of tnis title without grant of special privilege
The applicant's statement indicates that the heightlimitation ..
encroachments occurred as a result of dimensional changes that were
made in the floor structure and roof structure. These two structural
Ctringes increased the thickness ot the floors and the height ot the roof
strr"irre. Compensating changes could have been made to the interior
floor to ceiling fieights that woulO have alleviated the height problem with
neglgibte im[act to the interior spaces. The floor to ceiling heights were
not adjusted accordinglY.
stafl believes that approving the variance would be a grant of special
privitege that could iriren tnd door to similar, after-the-fact requesls. Statf
betiev6s it is important to strictly enforce the 33{oot height limitation in
order to maintain the integrity of the height regulation-
3. The effect ot the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public lacilities and
utilities, and Public safetY.
The requested variance will have no etfect on this criteria'
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findings B.
before granting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a granl of special
privilege inconsi-stent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That fte granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or weltare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinitY.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specilied
regulation would result in practical ditficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives ol this title'
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to thb same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation_
would deprive ine appticant of privileges enioyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Statf recommends denial of the requested variance. Staff believes that granting the height
variance would not be injurious to oiner properties in the vicinity or to the public health' satety
and welfare. However, staff believes tfrit ttre variance would be a grant of special privilege since
there does not appear to be any unusual circumstances unique to the property' or th.e..
construction proi6ss, that would justify the request. Staff believes that the strict and literal
intetpr"i"fiori of the height limitation is necessary to ensure that all residential construction in this
zone district is subject to the same height restriction'
tbveryono\p€c\memo3$ovey2.m l 3
b.
c.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
All Architects, Contractors and Surveyors Doing Work in the Town of Vail .
n *uu"tnun
Department of Communily Development .,s&V.
March 28, 1996 " r A$\\-
Survey Requirements
The following survey requirements apply to all new construction and to some additions. lf you
are unsure if your project requires an lmprovement Location Certificate, talk to the project
planner.
I. PRIOR TO A BUILDING PERMIT
Benchmark - On all surveys and lmprovement Location Certificates, identify the
benchmark used for the basis of the elevations. The same benchmark should be used
throughout the construction process to insure that the measurement of a building is
consistent. Items which make good benchmarks are sewer inverts, section corners, and
property corners. Do not use manhole rims, the asphalt in streets, or fire hydrants.
Architects and Builders should be aware that discrepancies exist in established
monumentation in the Vail Valley. Please consult a registered surveyor to verily
monumentation prior to developing plans for a site.
Estabtishment of base elevations for calculating buildinq heioht - lf a building has any
proposed ridge within one foot of the maximum building height, a spot elevation will be
required directly below that proposed ridge to ensure accurate measurement of the ridge
height. This additional spot elevalion will need to be done when the building footprint and
ridge elevations are identified and prior to submitting for a building permit' A
topographic survey with the necessary spot elevations, foundation, and the ridges
indicated shall be submitted with the building permit application. Any project that has
received Design Review Board approval prior to March 11, 1996 shall be exempt from
this requiremenl.
Recommendations for Owner/Builder Pro.iects - For owner/builders, the Town strongly
suggests that a registered surveyor stake out the foundation prior to excavation or
pouring. Additionally, after the foundation walls have been poured, we strongly
encourage that a surveyor shoot the elevation of the foundation wall. With this
inlormation, contractors will be able to accurately estimate the final building height before
the structure is completed. Contractors will be able to compensate in the construction
process to ensure that the structure does not exceed the height limit'
il.
|[.
Within three (3) weeks fo|lowing the approved foundation inspection, an ILC wil| be
i"qrit"O tor irolects that exhibil any of the following characteristics:
1. The building is within 3 leet of any setback line;
2. The driveway grade is grealer than 10%;
3. The building is within 6 inches of the maximum building height allowance;
4. The project invo|ves three or more separale Structures on the property; or
5. The project has received a variance for height or setbacks;
The ILC must be submitted to the Town of Vail for review and approval within three weeks
iorro*ing the approved foundation inspection. The Building Inspector.will nolify the
pioi..t fifann"i when the foundation inspection has been approved' lf an ILC is not
;#t"d and approved by the planner within three weeks, the Town of Vailwill issue a
Slop Work Ord'ei and no work will be allowed until the ILC is reviewed and approved'
Onie sumnitted to the Town, please allow two working days for the ILC to be reviewed'
The ILC slrould indicate the following:
1. Ttre tootprint oJ the building;
2- The elevalions of the foundation walls and the garage slab;
3. The grade of the centerline of the driveway, measured in twenty-foot increments; ancl
4. The distance of the foundation to each property line. The exlerior material existing on the
structure the day of the survey should be noted. Final distance will be measured lrom
tfe outside edg6 of the exterior wall material. lf ledges or supports for rock veneer or any
otrer {acing material have been built into the foundation, measure the setback to that
exferior point (see diagram on next page).
PHIOR TO A FRAMING INSPECTION
An ILC wil be required prior to any {raming inspection to verify that height and setback
standards have b'een met. No framing inspections will be scheduled until the ILC is
approvedr by the Town. Please allow Wo working days from the time the ILC is submitted
id ine time ihe inspection can be scheduled. The ILC must show the following
inlormatiwt:
.1. Roof Ridge Elevations - on the survey prepared for the framing inspection'
i"d;caie the highest point of al! roof ridges. The roof plan needs to be drawn on
the lLC. The roof ridge points identified on the ILC should align with the rool plan
on the Town's approved set of Building Permit plans'
Rifue height will be measured to the top ridge of the sheathins.. 9n the lLc' the
rd"yor inoutc note the roof material (if any) on the highest point of the ridge
t1.AFTER THE FOUNDATION IS POURED
Within three (3) weeks following the approved foundation inspection, an ILC will be
required for projects that exhibit any of the following characteristics:
1. The building is wilhin 3 feet of any setback line;
2. The driveway grade is grealer than 10%;
3. The building is within 6 inches of the maximum building height allowance;
4. The project involves three or more separate structures on the property; or
5. The project has received a variance for height or setbacks;
The ILC rnust be submitted to the Town of Vail for review and approval within three weeks
following tfte approved foundation inspection. The Building Inspector.will nolify the
project itannei when the foundation inspection has been approved. lf an ILC is not
iec'eiueb and approved by the planner within three weeks, the Town of Vail will issue a
Stop Work Ordei and no work will be allowed until the ILC is reviewed and approved.
Onie subrnitted to the Town, please allow two working days for the ILC to be reviewed'
The ILC sttould indicate the following:
't . The footprint of the building;
2. The elevations of the foundation walls and the garage slab;
3. Ttre grade of the centerline of the driveway, measured in tvventyjoot increments; and
4. The distance of the foundation to each property line. The exlerior malerial existing on the
slructure the day ol the survey should be noted. Final distance will be measured from
the outside edge of the exterior wall material. lf ledges or supports for rock veneer or any
ottrer facing miterial have been built into the foundation, measure the setback to that
enerior point (see diagram on next page).
PRIOR TO A FRAMING INSPECTION
An ILC wil be required prior to any framing inspection to verify that height and s-etback
slandards have been met. No framing inspections will be scheduled until the ILC is
approved by the Town. Please allow two working days from the time the ILC is submitted
td ine time ihe inspection can be scheduled. The ILC must show the following
informatiqn:
1. Rmf Ridge Elevations - on the survey prepared for the framing inspection,
indcate the highest point of al! roof ridges. The roof plan needs to be drawn on
the tLC. The roof ridge points identified on the ILC should align with the roof plan
on the Town's approved set of Building Permit plans.
Rifue height will be measured to the top ridge ot the sheathing.. on the lLc' the
sr.rJeyor Jnould note the roof material (if any) on the highest point of the ridge
|il.
2.
which exisls the day of the survey. The planner will add the dimensions of all
other malerials (except a cold roof vent). For example, if only the ridge beam has
been conslructed the day of the survey, the surveyor should note that, and the
planner will then add the dimensions of the insulation, sheathing, etc. to verify that
the finished product will not exceed the height limit. on the attached diagrams,
the point identified with an asterisk is the top ridge of the sheathing.
A cold roof vent, not exceeding 12 inches in height, measured from the sheathing
to the top of the shingles, is considered an architectural projection and will not be
included in the height.
Setbacks - The distance from the foundation to each property line should be
specified, noting the exlerior material existing on the structure the day of the
survey. Final distance will be measured from the outside edge of the exterior wall
material. lf ledges or supports for rock veneer or any other facing material have
been built into the foundation, measure the setback to that exterior point (see
diagram below).
{lo*
lcd"F:!v
rod&, ys6-t-
fopn4*lon P-4 Itf?€'.
#
fo( Qlo6E oF
StteAlll ,^t (1
wtril0e{r
E0.LD ROOF
r AIL
,rl-arj-".;" ?t>6L itL6
?su*r- r,,t^,TEF t,r. L PrF ..\ I M^rJtJf. f4Lo4,
co|4, ?aol ltLL a.a .'Ptc-'O orJ l^z pAfTE
lsfr FELT eA 6/D, l\t^.cpt FL{wE,
zt' 6tCZFef-t A lat a,e,
--- catJl. r.,l Er.4 F F.^Fte ( | Layz.F ?o+ -' 2- co i?1aLa A ,4-L F.lt,AC.' )eltf- 6/0" T \6t eg* ;1yr,.;oo:z
-
alLv. plt:.{2 €AI.E-Ef.l
Z--7]1 +LvEpcFT @. lol o,o,(d"lr;oE'c)
ToP dF
foP FIDGE OF
s//€iV/t'{U
fvo-t V
.- I
-
F-ao ro^rT t'.l-rdt-Attof-l
-
1+ocf.ttJq 4,9 FEa.rr2.
r,76. 116 r'.' qyp. pO. <xc.p Y^f|2F FJA{a|EF
o{t)- VAIJ f4.\r{ FrF .JT?Lbt,
Wfrtf 60Lb
ffi00F
RIDGE VENT DETAIL
I V.t-': t'- a'tr
rF
f0? QIoGE oF
JltEAiu lN fl
Y
ToP oF
ToP FIDGE OF
Sil€A7'fi^/ I
,+1 ..,LucftF.t e-ld co,(4*lc@,c)
-
|- F.!O fo^ff td.dL tleFl.
-
ytt x.l.tJq, An p.Eatr:'
"./o. I.!fc. ".' 41V pO, etep,y,{rr2F P F{.tEt-
a+U -Vt+A Fg.\!t Fef- 'Jf+q,
WlTtf ggLD
wtfll0Hr
o0l,D R00F
r
.rjar.i-a.p vt>6a ltL|.
- f -- c:-c4tJz; M^TDF1,.\L FrF \ | M^puf. p.c,o.-!.
@iE P.c'of flLe. ^.4 ^fto'o orl lAL D^ttE)J+ d)vLP- 7- l^.(EFg
15 [ F[-LT cA s/ D' 1\t^. cOt *tu/o,
tlb 6Vt-c?+a e Pl a,o,
--- coiJl. l.{ prFF^}Ja ( | L^y!.F
"o+
-. 2- cbJ*+La e. ,tt Tt',G,'6a)
"tE+-
6/0, T a.4 c2* i:LY\^rao:>
-'qAj/.
ptF{> €AFE-DIJ
ffi00F
o
I have read the survey Requirements stipulated in the Town of Vail rnemorandum dated March
28, 1996 and commit to adhere to them.
Signature of owner, or owner's representative
Print Name
Job Name
Permit Number
Legal Description: Lot , Block _, Filing
,j
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Greg Moffet
Greg Amsden
Kevin Deighan
Henry Pratt
January 8, 1996
Minutes
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Jeff Bowen
Dalton Williams
.-H 2.
--'
aPFBOrED.fiff s s gr
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COM[4 ISSION
Public Hearing
The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:05 p.m.
Dalton Williams and Jeff Bolen were absent.
STAFF PRESENT:
Mike Mollica
George Ruther
Randy Stouder
Lauren Waterton
Judy Rodriguez
2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a Major SDD Amendment lo allorv tor a 485 square foot addition to an
existing condominium in the Gateway Building located at 12 Vail Road, Unit S/Vail
Gatelay Plaza Building.
Applicant: Steve Biden representing Vail Apartments lnc.
Planner: Randy Stouder
Henry Pratt moved to table itern No. 1 , item No. 4 and item No. 5 until January 22, 1996.
Greg Amsden seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
A request for a building height variance to allow for a residence currently under construction to
exceed the height limit located at 1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD
#4).
Applicant: Bill Anderson representing Mr. and Mrs. Charles Hovey Planner: Randy Stouder
Randy Stouder gave an overview of the proposal. He stated that statf had reviewed the variance
criteria carefully and found that justification for granting the variance was lacking. According to the
applicant, depth was added to the floors and to the roof structure during the construction process
without compensating reductions in the height of the structure. Staff felt that the structural changes
could have been compensated for by reducing floor to ceiling heights. This was not done. Randy
stated that the variance request should be denied because statf finds that approval would be a grant of
special privilege.
Plaming and Enviroflrental Commission
Minules
January 8. 1996
Bill Anderson from Beck and Associates referred to a situation in East Vail where a house was 3' overA
the height limit and was granted a height variance. He was on the PEC at the time. He stated that the '
surveyor made a mistake which resulted in the height increase. He felt that the mistake made on the
Hovey residence was no different than the mistake made on the East Vail residence, both were honest
mistakes, He stated that the Hovey's had nothing to gain from the mistake. Bill said that he had
contacted the adjoining property owners. The adjacent owners did not have any problems with
granting a variance. They did not feel impacted by the additional height.
Greg Moffet asked for public comment. No one came forward.
Henry Pralt said although the impact is negligible and the neighbors don't care, he feels handcuffed
since the Findings are not met.
Greg Amsden said for practical reasons that the variance should be granted, but based on Code, it
would definitely be a grant of special privilege. He felt that he could not grant a variance based on a
review of the criteria and findings.
Kevin Deighan said he agreed with Greg Amsden's comments.
Greg Moffet asked if an ILC was performed after the foundation was poured. He also asked if this
mislake would have been caught by an ILC at that stage?
Bill said no, that structural elements above the foundation had been changed and this caused the
height increase.
Dave Peel said they went from a 10" tloor to 11-718". He also explained how the roof structure was i
modified slightly, resulting in additional height.
. Greg Moffet said that the height problem was a self imposed hardship and the Board could not grant a
variance.
Bill Anderson mentioned that for on-site construction misiakes, the Board has granted variances in the
past.
.Randy Stouder said the East Vail variance was for the Musyl home. That variance was granted
because of a surveyor error. The surveyor used an improper benchmark. Statf recommended denial
even though the entire roof of the structure would have had to be taken off. The PEC did grant that
variance.
Henry Pratt asked if there had been any other height variances granted recently.
Randy Stouder said that the Musyl variance was the only one he could recall in the two years he has
been with the Town.
Mike Molllca stated that each variance request has to stand on its own merits and should be judged
.individually. Mike Mollica also doesn't remember any other similar requests being granted.
Bill Anderson stated that if this variance was granted that it would not set a precedent for more
variance requests, at least not by him or his company. Beck and Associates has a long track history
plandng and Envirnonmenral Commission
_t
Januarv 8. 1996 2
(\'t
)
lor beinQ on target with heights and setbacks. We screwed up and made a mistake. He does not want
to tear up the roof and destioy the architect's design. He asked the Board to look at the request with
some common sense. No one has been adversely eflected and no one has gained anything from the
small height increase.
Greg Amsden made a motion for denial of the variance request.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously with a vote of 4-0.
Mike Mollica added for the record that the applicant has 10 days to submit a written request for an
appeal to Council. He also said that Council uses the same criteria and findings that the PEC uses'
Bill Anderson stated that the Hoveys want to move in by March 1, 1996 and asked if he could get a
TCO by posting a bond to guarantee that the height overage would be corrected. He did not feel that
the work could be completed prior to March 'l .
Mike Mollica said he would be comfortable rvith bonding.
3. A request for wall height variances and a driveway grade variance for the Koenig residence
located at 795 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 26, Vail Potato Patch subdivision.
Applicant: Eric Johnson for Gary Koenig Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overviel and quickly went through the items the applicant changed since the
December 11th meeting. Public Works suggested that a hryo-foot wide gravel shoulder be replaced
with a guardrail since the shoulder could noi maintain a safe slope to the street. Staff does not feel
there would be any negative impacts if the variances were granted. Staff has the greatest concern
with item 2 of the Criteria. lt is the staff's opinion that the hardship is self imposed by the contractor.
Staff is recommending denial because of a grant of special privilege. George then went over the
conditions in the memorandum, should the PEC grant the reouest o{ the variances.
Ray Coutash, owner of Beehive Construction and representing the property owners, the Koenig's and
Dowie's requested the variance be granted based on lhe landscape changes to save the existing trees.
One other hardship shows the surveyor made a mistake in the original survey and it wasn't discovered
until after the fact. This is the tirst time he heard about the guardrail request. The utilities run where
the guardrail is proposed. He would prefer plantings, rather than erecting a guardrail.
Greg Moffet asked for public input.
Henry Pratt said again practicality should rule rather than the letter of the law. A lack of a shoulder is a
serious issue for the Town. The driveway can be remedied. Providing a variance wouldn't do anything
lor the walls. There has been an effort 1o save existing trees. Henry is not optimistic about the wall
variance, however.
Greg Amsden said preservation of trees is iusrification lor granting the variance. There are site
constraints for the wall height variance. The driveway is a grant of special privilege.
Plandrg and En'ironm ental Commission
. lr{inutes
.ranuary 8, 1996
appileo. uyoilr Inqurreo as Io wnelner or not tne separatton request was really a vaflance. George and Mtt(e
Msllica informed Council that the gplicant was clearly requesting a separa[gp, as allowed by the Code, and
that Council must find the projecJets the appropriate criterialn orOer tfseparation tote granted.
Gary Oleson, owner of the property presented his request to Council, along with project arch
Donaldson.
Paul moved to overturn the decision of the DRB to deny the separation request due to rge size of the
lot, to avoid extensive driveway cuts, and because, he felt the proposed separation ed nicely to the
existing residences on Katsos Ranch Road. The motion was seconded by Peggy
Mike Jewett expressed he would rather uphold DRB's decision, and Rob Fo ed that many other options
were available to the applicant, and the applicant didn't necessarily have ild a duplex. Tom clarified that
the section in the Code listed examples of what might constitute a si nt site constraint. and said there
were many and varied situations. He went on to state that man fealures could possibly be considered.
Kevin inquired as to how the neighbors felt about the project,ill addressed the question, stating those
she spoke to wanted to see something on a much smaller . but that the size of the lot itself would allow
for a much bigger structure to be built. Sybill felt that through the variance request would be more
appropriate. George reminded council members was not a variance reouest to decide on. Mike
suggested another possible avenue for the would be to request a front setback variance, in order
to maintain development on the site as low as btical on the hillside and to reduce overall site imoacts.
DRB Chairman, Michael Arnett explained DRB's finding that there was nothing which would constitute
a significant site constraint as outlined e town regulations, and, therefore, the DRB had no other option
but to deny the request. Mike then the proper course of action would be to request a change in
zoning on the lot. Peggy ncil members of the need to determine whether site constrainls existed
that would allow for the sepa . Mark suggested the topography and the trees did constitute a site
constraint, stating that und e proposed scenario, the applicant would be removing the least amount of
trees. George stated that to staff, a significant tree was 3" in diameter and the trees shown on the
proposed project plan 6" in diameter. He further stated there were manv trees on the lot that were not
shown on the plan would ultimately be removed.
ark
A vote
requesr,
decision
was ta and failed, 2-4, Paul and
M Rob, Kevin and Peggy voting
DRB, with a second from Mike.
Sybill in favor of overturning the DRB's decision to d_eny the
in opposition. A motion was then made by Rob to uplbld the
A vote was taken and passed, 4-2. Sybill and Paul opposed.
Mr.asked the Council what direction should next be taken, and Mike Mollica stated he would be happy
t with the applicant to discuss the processes available.
a item number Commi
a variance to allow for a nce, currently under construction, to exceed the 33-foot
height residential structures. The project is located at 1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon
Subdivision (SDD #4).
Town of Vail Planner, Randy Stouder presented the item, and gave the following background: The applicant
is in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision. An lmprovement Location
Certificate (lLC) submitted by the applicant indicated that sections of three separate roof ridges were
constructed at heights exceeding the 33-foot height restriction for residential structures. The ridges in
question are labeled A, B and C, as shown on the attached site plan and elevation drawings. According to
the interpolated existing grades provided by Intermountain Engineering (based on the original topographic
survey), and the ridge height figures provided by Eagle Valley Surveying (lLC), ridges A, B, and C were
constructed a maximum of 8.4 inches above the 33-foot height limitation. The applicant requested that the
PEC grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges at the existing, constructed heights. The PEC
unanimously denied the requested height variance by a vote of 4-0, finding that granting the requested height
variance would be a grant of special privilege to the applicant. Randy further stated that although no input had
been received from adjoining property owners, staff recommended denial of the applicant's request because
t),J J* C*,t I'*.2 n Ly fi^t 0t/U"l\t
i
I
! agreed it would be granting a special privilege.
'trchitect, Dave Peel, and Bill Anderson of Beck & Associates presented the height variance request on behalf
of the applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Charles Hovey, claiming that floor and roof modifications caused the overages.
Sybill asked if there wasn't a 1'grace allowed. Randy stated there had been in prior years, but because it
was being taken advantage of, survey policies had been adopted and had been in place since April of 1991.
Also, Randy expressed that the survey policies clearly state there is no 1'grace allowance for rooi height, and that the policy is distributed to every contractor who takes out a building permit.
Greg Amsden, Vice Chairman of the PEC was available to answer questions. peggy expressed her feeling
that it had been possible to account for the error and that it should have been corrected. Mike Jewett was
looking for any criteria that might allow the variance to be approved without granting a special privilege. Dave
Peel suggested similar situations had occurred in the past. Tom Moorhead iniormed Council tlrat eacn
variance application had a different set of circumstances which must be evaluated o its own merils after
reviewing the criteria and findings.
A motion was made by Kevin Foley to uphold the decision of the PEC, with a second from Rob Ford. A vote
was taken and resulted in a tie, 3-3; Kevin, Rob and Peggy in favor, Paul, Mike and Sybill opposed; the motion
was defeated.
Council members in favoi of granting the height variance felt Council should be more flexible and cited the
following reasons: no complaints were received by the neighbors, to reframe the structure would cost the
applicant time and money, and that sending a rigid message would negate the need for lhe appeal process.
Council members opposed to granting the variance felt that being responsible to the community and
- , consistent in applying the rules was important, and suggested adjusting the height rule as opposed to grinting
,F-special privileges. Mike Jewett then moved to overturn the PEC's decision to deny the height varianie, and r the motion was seconded by Paul.
Town residents Martin Walbaum and Scotty McGoon expressed their opinions, encouraging Council to
approve the variance.
Town Manager, Bob McLaurin informed council members that the issue was not the amount of the overage,
but the fact that there was an overage. He suggested adhering to the regulation or changing the height
restriction.
A vote was then taken and resulted in a tie of 3-3, Paul, Mike and Sybill voting in favor, Kevin, peggy and Rob
voting in opposition. Therefore, the decision of the PEC to deny the height variance stands.
Next on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob indicated everything had been covered at the work
session earlier in the day.
There being no further business, a motion was made by paul to adjourn. !
Mike Jewett commended the Police Department for their efforts and expressed satisfaction frqm the
,a. community regarding break-ins. Jewitt also complimented Public Works Jor the fine job they [gd done r removing snow during the recent heavy accumulations. "'i:
Rob moved to adjourn and the motion was seconded by Kevin Foley. The meeting was adjourned at
approximately 9:35 P.M.
AfiEST:
Respectfully submitted,
o o
@
t\rr fs
l.t)
t
\
R
L
€
April11, 1996
Mike Mollica
Community Dwelopme,nt D€,partment
Tornm ofVail
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL CO 81657
RE:Hovey Reside,nce at 1339 Westhaven Circle - height variance
DearMke:
Per our phone discussions I am applying for a height variance at the Hovey Residence. It is my
understanrthg that Randy Stouder and David Peel have dweloped the following criteria:
A) 8u to 0" for a distance of4'-6"
B) 8" to 0" for a distance of4-0"
C) 8" to 0" for a di$ance of 3'-9"
(See attached drawing.)
It is our contention that the use ofa topo survey as an absolutely accurate documsrt is not
correct. The national standard allows for a 1 foot plus or minus tolerance based on 2 foot
contours. (See attached letter from Intermountain Engineering.) With this accepted tolerance our
ridge heights could be 4" under.
The bottom line, it seems to us tlat there is no way at the prese,nt time to accurately prove that
the Hovey Residence encroaohes into the height limitation.
With this in nind we are not sure that a variance is really needed but as it seems to be our only
alternative, we are following the Toum of Vail's suggested course of action.
Sincerelv.
- -/)
Bill Anderson
Project Manager
Beck and Associates, Iuc.
o I lrrteplflounfah IEnglnccdlgud.
JanuAf:7 12, 1996
I.lr. Dnvo Ptrl
PO Eox laoz Vail, CO 81658
Vl.a laxr 1?6-15?2
R8: Lot-23, CIan f{ron Subdlvlelon ProJect l|o. 949568
Dear Dav.s
e
ViUAtAtlstA Uefudee.
W\ 1{
flom: nn6 ?e4
llhls l€ttor le l_n rcgard to the aocurrcy of tbs tepographlo rap on the reforenccd property. rt ti our foucy to folror the Ii!T1"1. .r{applng eqcri--ao-y siancerar uhlch requrrr tlrar arl Eopograpnic 9"-p be wlthln t Ll2 tho contour Inte*al of the nao.i'ne_ EolrograFhtc pap ahorn fron our gurv.y on thir proJrct hEe'z foqt contoura vhlch E€an! th€y ar. rrlthln-t t foot.'
If you have at|y furthor questlona, plca$ call.
Durno D. tehrlnger p.8., p.L.Et.
7/Metodf Boad,l?!l o Boxg/E o Avon,ColoradoElo2o . Phone;070.949.5gta r EunoenvuDrecl&16ill
1420 Vance Streel o lJrermod, Colorado80Zit r phone: 3(Bqt:l{tEE
RE:
April ll, 1996
Mike Mollica
Community Development Dep artment
Torvn of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. CO 81657
Hovey Residence at 1339 Westhaven Circle - height variance
Dear Mike:
Per our phone discussions I am applyrng for a height variance at the Hovey Residence. It is my
understanding that Randy Stouder and David Peel have dweloped the following criteria:
A) 8" to 0" for a distance of 4'-6"
B) 8" to 0" for a distance of 4'-0"
C) 8" to 0" for a distance of 3'-9"
( See attached drawing. )
It is our contention that the use of a topo survey as an absolutely acaurate document is not
correct. The national standard allows for a I foot plus or minus tolerance based on 2 foot
contours. (See attached letter from Intermountain Engineering.) With this accepted toleranc€ olu
ridge heights could be 4" under.
The bottom line, it seems to us that there is no way at tle present time to accurately prove that
the Hovey Residenoe encroaches into the height limitation.
With this in mind we are not sure that a variance is really needed but as it seems to be our only
alternative, we are following the Town of Vail's suggested course of aotion.
Bill Anderson
Project Manager
Beck and Associates. lnc.
Sincerely,
o bi\Ahiln$iu U,etsqdfu
W\ |ffi- +'ry
fram: E*,w FeN
lffi l Enslnccr.|ngul.
January lA, 1996
llr. Davc Pccl
PO Box lZOz vail, co 81658
VLa fax: 1?6-4572
n8: lot-23, clcn lJyon gubdivlclon
ProJect tfo. 94g56g
Dear DsvG !
Thig retter ls in rcaard to the accuracy of th€ tcpographlo l.ap on ttre rgfeaenccdl prolerty. rt rs our Soricy-irr forrow the I-"!i:lll-,$nning aggr95aoy eiandaraa shicn- re{uirr rhar, atl Eopographic Fa-p bo within *, Llz tha contour inter-val of the naD..r'ne_ Eopqgraphlc rnap shown fron our Burv.y on this project hae-2 foot oontoure vhLcli n€anr th€y ar. wtttrtn'r -i r"LE --
If you have any further queetlona, pleaae call.
sf\etv, q n s
Duane D. Fehrlnger p,E.r p.L.s.
TTMetodfRoed,t4)l r Box978 r Avon,Colorado01020. Phoru:970-949.5012 r FtunDsrwerDifecr:Eg&1trll
1420Vance Streel r L*ewood, Colorado8o2lb r phone: 3[B2g?-01S8
opdrnd {/t7D6 Aepno.dor&t Apt l?' 1996
PECMEE:TINGDA1B llr;t l3r 1990
aIILICATION ro}[ { v{nIiNcE
GEtF&qFson\rAfloN
IUlslyov'rrtrrr irrrqriredfor rolprq
BRrEr DEscRmroN * **Jffi"ffiJ#:-# I,I'f iT:Y: i:y*BRIETDESCRffIoN*R** rorclnllt tn t[rcr
qhh-rrFosl Ll 8i dacr..tllad tg 0',foF f,t:!!rrq3!l
fcctr
.- ; --
B.
c.
D,
'for 33' lfacel teot.
,cDOrrsc 9.0. qor i{'30
-___
6o,*" (ozofrr*rnoo
crrr, s1'4x6, zpJglLqo]lnlu _gf6SE .---qF-r+
:,r MloFanrlcrrilT'snelg6nsrrATnB-_Brll rrlcrsqn (Eect rnc ts3mlrtet. rhg-l
aDDRESE P-0- 8ox l03O _-;-;__ .. ,. EoNRI:lgleqltog
crr, CTATE, Ap_Yrll 1 Colorrrto 81658
NAI'IBcrFowNBE(B)(rtD.rd
O$rNliE{s) sENAfc <-c
ADDRBCS 0loodDofr noad (ffilsF rG{
cffy,gtlteozo llqglrsterr tr$eqhusettr 0lg+l
ror--?l--aLo*_!L -_mrmst h, r,jry c, eten\lmffi ---_
srREErADDnEss l3il9 lestlnvm Ctrck
%a.r,*rarE,tr---!,!!r Gr0lorarb 8t657
-r'*-+tr
E
NE
\|"
nJ0.0o&tID_G&t__;aY_ . __ _
tfr. fcr r|rua b': pod b&c Or C@ll(rrty DrnCqmc &grr{{uqB,r:l sEETr ]$tr p!,qp6e[ffi mmffiHffitr'*",tr3$ ""
!'nP ^PqrcsTroN
mNSEBFNcq Agtcqlkr{or ccfcusc wfir rutlningr{oobc-ir-rtru3lyr*ourrca&dto daoiaoif !|yldarnirrt ht(tEiicn h Ags* No rlDhir.im w l bo roc{d.l utr fl cqrtco (!tta idr& dl [;r rc+tq, by thr zdsf sdminirrrtorl. n ir (b0 Tptlt'ad.,tqdrU$ly to Ddo! r apohnbl wi6 -Uro rFr., Oa r ilor oeflri',ur rIboi d rtsifildr
fltq[firralAroRM{TroN
ooulrrssroN Grc) lrr\y srlRtrrr.rr! au cinnmii,is-irl-riffiovnr m$t rB cytltoE cr, lvmr r.l]nou! A BUII.DING IRIMIT tS ft ISTIID.
?'6'?j- --r-ie€-92-f -ebts-- --=8!NIauJ-b-il{-5le--61': dt riFll-'e6--'f i-:uiv
.o
,d not flnd evidence of significant site constraints. The motion passed unanimously (4-0). George then
,erenced a letter from the applicant dated December 29, 1995, appealing the DRB decision (see attachment
-) and the applicant's reference of the intent of the Design Review Guidelines (Section 18.54.010) as a
possible basis for overturning the DRB decision. A copy of Section | 8.54.010 from the Municipal Code was
provided for reference (see attachment 3). George went on to state that upon review of the applicant's
. separation request, staff recommended that the Town Council uphold the DRB decision of December 20,
f- 1995, of denial. He stated that in staff's opinion, the applicant had not demonstrated the existence of \ / significant site constraints on the lot as required by Section 18.54.050(l) of the Municipal Code.
Peggy Osterfoss questioned whether the section on "lntent" superseded the criteria that might constitute a
significant site constraint as outlined in section 18.54.050(l) of the Code. Tom Moorhead explained that while
applying the criteria, one could look to the general intent, but that the specific criteria still needed to be
applied. Sybill inquired as to whether or not the separation request was really a variance. George and Mike
Mollica informed Council that the applicant was clearly requesting a separation, as allowed by the Code, and
that Council must find the project meets the appropriate criteria in order for a separation to be granted.
Gary Oleson, owner of the property presented his request to Council, along with project architect, Mark
Donaldson.
Paul moved to overturn the decision of the DRB to deny the separation request due to the large size of the
lot, to avoid extensive drivieway cuts, and because, he felt the proposed separation contributed nicely to the
existing residences on Katsos Ranch Road. The motion was seconded by Peggy.
Mike Jewett expressed he would rather uphold DRB's decision, and Rob Ford stated that many other options
were available to the applicant, and the applicant didn't necessarily have to build a duplex. Tom clarified that
the section in the Code listed examples of what might constitute a significant site constraint, and said there
were many and varied situations. He went on to state that man made features could possibly be considered.
Kevin inquired as to how the neighbors felt about the project, and Sybill addressed the question, stating those
she spoke to wanted to see something on a much smaller scale, but that the size of the lot itself would allow
for a much bigger structure to be built. Sybill felt that going through the variance request would be more
appropriate. George reminded council members there was not a variance request to decide on. Mike
suggesled another possible avenue for the applicant would be to request a front setback variance, in order
to maintain development on the site as low as practical on the hillside and to reduce overall site impacts.
DRB Chairman, Michael Arnett explained the DRB's finding that there was nothing which would constitute
a significant site constraint as outlined in the town regulations, and, therefore, the DRB had no other option
but to deny the request. Mike then suggested the proper course of action would be to request a change rn
zoning on the lot. Peggy reminded council members of the need to determine whether site constraints existed
that would allow for the separation. Mark suggested the topography and the trees did constitute a site
constraint, stating that under the proposed scenario, the applicant would be removing the least amount of
trees. George stated that according to staff, a significant tree was 3" in diameter and the trees shown on the
proposed project plan were 6" in diameter. He further stated there were many trees on the lot that were not
shown on the plan that would ultimately be removed.
A vote was taken and failed, 24,Paul and Sybill in favor of overturning the DRB's decision to deny the
i.equest, Mike, Rob, Kevin and Peggy voting in opposition. A motion was then made by Rob to upfbtO tne
decision of the DRB, with a second from Mike. A vote was taken and passed, 4-2. Sybill and Paul opposed.
Mr. Olseon asked the Council what direction should next be taken, and Mike Mollica stated he would be happy
to meet with the applicant to discuss the processes available.
Agenda item number five was an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's (PEC) denial of
a request for a height variance to allow for a residence, currently under construction, to exceed the 33-foot
height limitation for residential structures. The project is located at 1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon
Subdivision (SDD #4).
Town of Vail Planner, Randy Stouder presented the item, and gave the following background: The applicant
is in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision. An lmprovement Location
Certificate (lLC) submitted by the applicant indicated that sections of lhree separate roof ridges were
conslructed at heights exceeding the 33-foot height restriction for residential structures. The ridges in
question are labeled A, B and C, as shown on the attached site plan and elevation drawings. According to
the interpolated existing grades provided by lntermountain Engineering (based on the original topographic
survey), and the ridge height figures provided by Eagle Valley Surveying (lLC), ridges A, B, and C were
constructed a maximum of 8.4 inches above the 33-foot height limitation. The applicant requested that the
PEC grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges at the existing, constructed heights. The PEC
unanimously denied the requested height variance by a vote of 4-0, finding that granting the requested height
variance would be a grant of special privilege to the applicant. Randy further stated that although no input had
been received from adjoining property owners, staff recommended denial of the applicant's request because
i)JJ" t"-"J i:-,-| T-Lt 1l'.,"r,' !'t ,it" ai'
/ agreed it would be granting a special privilege.
I
rrchitect, Dave Peel, and Bill Anderson of Beck & Associates presented the height variance request on behalf
of the applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Charles Hovey, claiming that floor and roof modifications caused the overages.
Sybill asked if there wasn't a 1' grace allowed. Randy stated there had been in prior years, but because it
was being taken advantage of, survey policies had been adopted and had been in place since April of 1991.
Also, Randy expressed that the survey policies clearly state there is no 1' grace allowance for roof height, and
that the policy is distributed to every contractor who takes out a building permit.
Greg Amsden, Vice Chairman of the PEC was available to answer questions. Peggy expressed her feeling
that it had been possible to account for the error and that it should have been corrected. Mike Jewett was
looking for any criteria that might allow the variance to be approved without granting a special privilege. Dave
Peel suggested similar situations had occurred in the past. Tom Moorhead informed Council that each
variance application had a different set of circumstances which must be evaluated o its own merits after
reviewing the criteria and tindings.
A motion was made by Kevin Foley to uphold the decision of the PEC, with a second from Rob Ford. A vote
was taken and resulted in a tie, 3-3; Kevin, Rob and Peggy in favor, Paul, Mike and Sybill opposed; the motion
was defeated.
Council members in favor of granting the height variance felt Council should be more flexible and cited the
following reasons: no complaints were received by the neighbors, to reframe the structure would cost the
applicant time and money, and that sending a rigid message would negate the need for the appeal process.
Council members opposed to granting the variance felt that being responsible to the community and
consistent in applying the rules was important, and suggested adjusting the height rule as opposed to granting
,l.special privileges. Mike Jewett then moved to overturn the PEC's decision to deny the height variance, and r the motion was seconded by Paul.
Town residents Martin Walbaum and Scotty McGoon expressed their opinions, encouraging Council to
approve the variance.
Town Manager, Bob McLaurin informed council members that the issue was not the amount of the overage,
but the fact that there was an overage. He suggested adhering to the regulation or changing the height
restriction.
A vote was then taken and resulted in a tie of 3-3, Paul, Mike and Sybill voting in favor, Kevin, Peggy and Rob
voting in opposition. Therefore, the decision of the PEC to deny the helght variance stands.
Next on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob indicated everything had been covered at the work
session earlier in the day.
There being no further business, a motion was made by paul to adjourn.
Mike Jewett commended the Police Department for their efforts and expressed satisfaction from the
..',. comfiunity regarding break-ins. Jewitt also complimented Public Works for the fine job they [6d done \ removing snow during the recent heavy accumulations.
.
Rob moved to adjourn and the motion was seconded by Kevin Foley. The meeting was adjourned at
approximately 9:35 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
ATTEST:lr )l,\J
VilJ4X. lhaAunhnu<-
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
(Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
It
Council Highlights/Add 3
-Design Review Board Appeal, 3275 Katsos Ranch Road
The Councilvoted 4-2 (Navas, Johnston against)to uphold Design Review Board
denial of a duplex separation request for a proposed residence to be constructed at
3275 Katsos Ranch Road. Council members voting in support of the DRB decision
said they were unable to identify a "significant site constraint" which would permit the
separation. For details, contapf George Ruther in the Community Development
Department at 47 9-21 45.
-Planning & Environmental Commission Appeal, 1339 Westhaven Circle
Due to a 3-3 tie vote by the Council, PEC denial of a request for a height variance on
the property will stand. The applicant had asked for the variance after it was
determined the residence, currently under construction, exceeds the 33-foot height
limitation for residential structures. Three separate roof ridges were constructed a
maximum of 8.4 inches above the 33-foot height limitation. Rather than allow an
exception to the zoning code, Council members voting in support of the PEC denial
(Osterfoss, Foley, Ford) suggested adjusting the 33-foot height rule rather than
granting special privileges to applicants. However, the remaining Council members
(Navas, Jewett, Johnston) disagreed, saying the Council should be more flexible in
considering variance requests. For more information, contact Randy Stouder in the
Commun ity Development Departmen t at 47 9-21 50.
###
UPCOMING DISCUSSION TOPICS
January 23 Work Session
Kraige Kinney 15 Year Anniversary
Update on Category lll
Joint Meeting with County Commissioners (cooperation, transportation, housing &
annexation)
Update on Railroad Abandonment
January 30
Special Election!
February 6 Work Sesslon
Revisit Town Council Appointments
Youth Recognition Award Discussion
Site Visit, Glen Lyon Office Building
February 6 Evening Meeting
Glen Lyon Office Building Ordinance, first reading
February 13 Work Session
All Day Public Process Work Session
f,ruAcBn EoPERTT flr{ERS ffi Lot 23. Glea Lyon Subrltv.
1339 Weethsver Clrcle
Vall, Colorado
Un t4 (1350 Greenhll Courr):
UIT 15 (134n GreenhlJ.t Court):
ItT t6 (1320 Greenhtll Court):
IIn lE (1359 Greenh1ll Cqurt);
lf,ll 22 (138O lJcathavor Crrctc):
Un U (1319 Ucathaven Clrcle):
Ed and Glorln Hlc.kn
3026 South Padre lal.and Drlvc
Corprs Ctdstt, Trxas 78415
UN'IT A llltchell and l4ary Tolf f,arlln
375 Cbertnut
lfinuetka, IUlnots 60093
IJIIIT B
trIEFd.f J. Karltn and I'tary tlolf Eerlin
375 Cbeetnut
If:lnactlta, f Utnolc 60G)3
IIT{IT A
Jeffery ll. and Sal1y Helmo llorn
699 Soda Crcck Drl.ve
Evergreeol Colorado 80439
UIET B
Allen and Janet Gergterrbcrgcr
1320 Grccohlll Court Vall' Colorcdo 81657
UilIT I8-B
Rlcherd U. and Ju11e L. llelster
4O15 f,anover Street llBllas, Tcrae 7524i
UTIIT A
Steven A. aad C.orlnne Saldanhs
72O2 Ayrahtre land
Doca Raton, Flortda tr1496-1418
MNT B
Phlllp A. and ltlarJorle OfDeen
I?tcma.r D. and Sereh gl€aaon
22@ Cresr [6ne
llclesn r Vlrgln{.a 221 01
ItlL llavelopoeat
P.O. Box 3451
Val1, Coloredo 81658
Town of Va11, Co'lorado IRAGf E:
L
S.-
ilAY-15-96 tlED 11 :47 BECI( AND ASSOCIATES FAX NO, 3O3g 4943 o P, 01
FAX
Ttr:
Fnx #:
Srrbjcct:
Datc:
Pnger:
Dcor Tom:
Torn Moorehead
Town of Vcil
970-479-2151
llovcy Rcsidonce - Height Vadance
May 15, 1996
l
As a rcsult of ow denial on Monday, May 13, 1996 by rhe P.E,C. I un rcqucsting that we be
allowed to appcal that decision to thc town council.
Again it is our contention that the method uscd tu deternrinu heighi is only accurate to a (+ or -) 12",
Plcase let me know when our appcal will bo heaxt by the council,
Sincelely,
WA d*atua.a.)
lJill Andcr.qon
0AJtm
Donrinic Mauricllo
Fax:479-2452
From the desk of...
8i AndeEon
Vice Fmrident
Beck and AESocieteE, Inc.
P,O, Box 4030 v l, t;(J 81658
97G949-1800
Fax: 97S9494335
(:c:
l.
2.
J.
4.
6.
291 The Surveying Handbook
9-16. MISTAKES AND BLUNDERS
Blunders differ from errors and result from carelessness and poorjudgment' The
following are a few examples of mistakes:
Poor linework or lenering, cr€ating ambiguities.
Using the wrong scale.
Setting incorrcct angles on a drafting machine or protractot .
Misinterpretation of field notes.
Misorientation in all or portion of a plot.
Inappropriate choice of drafting media.
9.17. MAPPING STANDABDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
Federal mapping agencies have adopted standards to conbol expected map ac-
curacy by specifying the maximum error Pemitted in horizontal positions and
elevations shown on maps. A map conforming to these spocifications can use
the statement, "This map complies with the National Map Accuracy Standards."
The mapping standards state that the following maximum errors arc permitted
on maps:
Horizontal accuracy. For maps at scales larger than 1:20,00 (1 in. = 1667
ft), not more than lO% of the well-defined points tested shall have a plotting
error in excess of 1130 in. For maps of smaller scales, the eror factor is 1/50
in. Well-defined points are characterized as easily located in the 6eld and capable
of being plotted to within 0.01 in.
References
Arncricrn Society of Civil Engineers. l9t!3. Mdp utcs, scalcs and accuracics for enginacing md
ossociated purposes. Repon of $e ASCE Suncying and MrPPing Division Commincc on
Canographic Surveying. New York: ASCE.
American society of civil Engineers. 1972. Sclection of maps for cnginccring ard plrnning. Task
committec for prcParation of a manual on sclection of map tyPcs, scalcs, and accurrcies for
cngine€ring and Planning. Journal of thc Suneying and Mapping Divtiioa' ASCE' No' SUI '
Brinker, R. C., and P. R. Wolf. 1984. Elemcntory $urvcying. ?th ed. Ncw Yort: Hrrpcr & Row'
Vertical accuracy.than l0% of elevations tested
t t
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPr.RT}IE]iT OF CO}$'LSTN' DEITLOPIIETT
| *.ro, ,
ADDRESS
Pn'OJECT
CTIECIiS }I DE PAYABLE TO TO\TT{ OF T'AIL
F;
F
L-"
IE :
=:
a.l
q
:;1 ::l
a;{:
=t =fl
a
ACCOE:\T :{O.rrEM - ' NO. -- TAX- -- C(FIE& - - TOTAL
Ol 0000 r+1540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS 5t.00
0t 0000 42415 UMFOR\{ B UlLDll.'G CODE s54.00
iF
!L
!j
E
0t oo00 42415 UNIFOLV PLLMBING CODE s39.00
oI 0000 42415 UNIFOR\I N,IECHANICAL CODE s37.00
or oo00 4l4l 5 LINIFOR\,I FIRE CODE 5i6.O0
r I (x)00 41415 NAT]ONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE s37.00 ot 0000 414t5 OT]IER CODE BOOKS
oI oo00 4l 548 BLUE PRINTS (MYLARS)s /.00
0t 0000 424i2 XEROX COPiES ({) )5
o I ooo0 4241 2 STUDIES
0l oo00 1?1t2 | TovFEEs cot\lpuTER pRocRAN,l
dTE00-llrlT-l-Ft
ot 000041_132 | Pl 0Tm00?]]lf-l-o
I s5.00
41.+ll I sl
JIJI T-TAT
-:-:--:i-:---J- :*iig tY:{tJJt Irn I:IITTN
.15110 lTc --h5f-l=m ::::_:_I_i_:r2lil!lT,l
IIin-iTTf,/rirrFu
ttr"TD
4l jio ico
I
0I (Xtou4TJ _r0 ZONING CODE AMENDMENJS s250.00
0t 0000 4t3_10 RE - ZONING s200.00
OTHER
i OTHER
lrorxL:ff2,j?,0c
_-\rlt f,'i ir \[r 1,1 lAlN,t
casE t-t cK.s I I tl.0Ll *. ur, i L(./
JAN-30-96 TUE 12:15
j
rrhllU',N
BEcU'$$qcrfIEs_.-_
lf,*i.tf; ;il*3|"f,: r!"&":r Beside*ce
NAI{E OT
ADDISgS
NNC OF
FgBsoil ggaltlTtffia
P,O.Box 1030 Vail, CO ttGSB
or{rER o*.(::ffi::
rDDNE 0 9iloodholm Roadr. t{annhe's1Ea. HA 0Ig4{
SIGNAT!'SE OF OTryNER
L9gAitrIoH Orr tRpalEer 1339 tle circle, vail 8165?
DEBgiIp.fIg[ OF pROjruC[ . trew Consrructior
ili*iHilfliif'l-fiHH'll*H'fiT$1ffi ,[ffioiliil'gl*#'*fif DE$,Gr{nEvIEt{ tonnD.
476-1506, B&lIr r f .
A. DBS9EI?Tr'N or mu-rr-ollerwr*e .(FnE_l-shNLDrr{c, .wAr*,pRoJgsErsc, rrei, ricr.iibii"EiiI nnsu6u,%
zro,
B.
FAX N0, 3039490318
,*,*,'r"l*il]
ood w./netal
C.SI!E ot gvEnAEI, $rON, tr&E oF.DEBrERrtfc }}tD II)OO
I
CTIDE D.
E.
F.
Gt
[.
DESGRIBE L,IGHTING (EItgTlHG OR DnODO!ID! _rzr I , . ,.
graile
ITENCTII 0F DUSITIESS rngNrAsE (FTl
CONDOUilIUT{ ASSOCIACT6!| APDROVAIJ , fAtr'IrAcHl - ..
FgO[' OI SIGN A8EA.E I itEr
-|llaalb
llElctlT oF flcil ttotrE
sEEr t20, 00 pr,ui,Jlt*r$.TlR EeqsRE
JAN-29-96 l{c)N 11 :49
r.vlr.a ultlta
DBSr(N
BECK
U;S00IATES
FAX N0, 303s4e0318
OrD)l
Rsv:tEfl BOA'D AeFITTCATTON . TOm[ Or n.t$l
r. UJ
t.
A.
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE Ol'DRB MEETINGT lrt***irtt**
INdWPLB,/'E AFPLIC4nIONS EAy rrag Et- sdfrEptrrnp EOF., Fsylffi{4 *tt*tt***t
PRSiFCT urtOilal'rd:
DETICRIPTION:-Jrojrgct si gmage f,er Hovey.Ef,fiiCance
B" TYPE OF REVIEWS
-Ne$, ConstrucEion ($200. O0) x r.{inor Alterat,lon (920. O0)-- Aatdlition ($50.00)
-Concepbual
Review (fOl
ADDRE$S: 1339 Westhaven Circle, Vailr.-go.. 816R7 ,..._. ._ .
LEGAII DESCRIPTXONT tot, .?l Block Subdivision Glen I,yon sub-division
C.
D.
If property is clescribed by descrigtion, please provide to EhlE application.
a meetg and bounda
on a separate gheet lega1
and attach
ZONING: - S.D.L.E.
It NAI.TE OF
Mailing APPLTICAtiIT:Beck and Associat
Addresg:
Phone
APPI'ICINT'S REPRESEMIIIYP; Bil
Addreger L.q. lqx !!l0r v
Phone
G.
tf,
NT!{E OF'
t-iailing
NA!{E OF OwNER(s):e Charlie
1.
APPITICr,!f0N8 ruL& NOf 8E PIOCBSSED
Condoniniun Approval. if applicable.
ffitEOW OrtER 'g grcillmR8
DRB FEEr DRE feeE, aE shown above, are to be Daid aE Che
tlme of submittal of the DRB application. IJater, when
applying for a building pcrmit, please identify ghe accuraEe valuatlon of the proposal.' The Town of vail will adju$t Ehe
f,ee according to the table below, Eo ensure the correcE, fee ls paid.
FES PAtrD: I CEECf, $r . QATEr , BYr
Malling Address:
JAN-30-SO TUE 11134 BECI(.IUD ASS0CIATES FAX N0, 3039494335 2 lLE - At'"i | [s''"la"teO
P, 02
"J)D L\
/r/ sl"
I
4z.'
I
I
I
,l
I
I +
Drry,ffim'#\w5
4,,rdrffi'Ji*,r"
A PRIVATE RESIDENGE AT
1339 WEST entctRcLE
PERMIT #5-0210
T Dwe Peel --
Peel and Lan geffualEr
470-4506
c|tilt of,itltr?orr urt\ gunt','
949-1800
ry4'v{ .* _-
o*f
,r(''2-u*,' '\ ' q\,/'tA\b ' \'/,"'t q2 ' '/'\'
,/\
lc, o
, $// 1tl'lF,/ \ ;,/ 4v i
1r'
s
v/
,.v!.d.,,7,s. o a i $wHili
Dgsr@v REi\rrEw BoARD ApprJrcATroN - Tor{N oF vArrJ, cor,oRAddll 16 1gg0 l:)
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
rtrt!t*******
INCOI'IPITEIIE APPLICATIONS IIAY NO? BE SCHE0WEp FOR REVIEW.**********
...*".* . *:i.tilf,i_
I.
A.
EI
c.
TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction (g200.00) -lMinor Atrerarion (g20.OO)Addit.ion ($50.00) - Conceprual Review (90)
ADDRESS, M4 M&lr400rt A,r"to
D. LEGAI, DESCRT
Subdivision
If property
descript,ion,to this appl
f..
F.
ZONING:
NAME OF
Mailing Address:
is described by a meets and bounds legaI please provide on a separaLe sheeE and attach ication. ,Wl+,,ry%Q.
APPI.TICAIiIIT:
G.
Phone
H.NAIr{E OF OVINER(S) :
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are Eo be paid at the time of submittal of the onn applicaLion. L,ater, when
applying for a building permit, please ident.ify the accurate valuat.ion of the proposal. The Town of vail will adjust the fee according Co Che table be1ow, to ensure the correct fee is pald.
FEE PAID: i CHECK S: DATE: BY:
r.
,J.
APPIJICATIONS WIITII NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOW OWNER'S SICil|IATUEE
FEE SCHEDUI.IE:
VALUATION
$ 0 $ 10,000
$ 10, 001 - g 50, 000
$50,001 -g 150,000
9150, 001 - $ 500, 000
$500, 001 - 91, 000, 000 g Over 91,000,000
DESIGN REVIEIV BOARD APPROVAIJ E:ITPIRES
APPROVAL I'IIIJESS A BUILDING PBRUIT IS IS STARTBD.
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100. 00
$200. 00
$400.00
$s00. 00
ONE YEilR AFTER FINAIJ
ISSUED AIID CO}TSTRUCTION
NAME OF PRO.TECT:
IJEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT'Z BLOCK
STREET ADDRESS:
The following information is
Review Board before a final
IJIST OF MATERIALS
SUBDIVISION
required for submit.tal to the Design
approval can be given:
A. BUILDING TTIATERIAIIS:
Roof
Siding
Other waII Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
rui^affi^X
COI,OR
Doors
Door Trim
-
---Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chinneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Wa11s
Ext,erior Lighting
OEher
Designer:
Phone:
B.I.AD'.TDSCAPING: Name of
.\.\'
.J
\->-
o
iii
ri :p
{s s .s
N s
$,k g.
i,
o
\
e,
t''.
/5 \
,,/
1 Is)
k's
€s,t^
€sF \-'{s sNs , ,1, ,.
,
s l,t-
I o
LETTER OF CREDIT FORMAT
Legat Description: Lo83 Block--
Subdivision G 1 en r.yofiling
-Addressl ?1q r^rAq{-harran di rcle
w
Date ot Expiration:
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGBEEMENT, made and entered into this 14 - day oi Februarv 19 gf by
and among Beck & associates (hereinafter called the "Developer"), and the TowN
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the 'Town") and -lse.sr__sta= (herelnafter called the "Bank").
WHEFIEAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval of the llovev Residence
plans, dated 6/29 , 19 glwishes to enler into a Developer lmprovement
Agreemenl; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sutticient in the
iudgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certain lmprovements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral lo guarantee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
following:
Developer aglee^s-tg eglablisfr a letter of credit with a Bank in Eagle County in a dollar
amount ot $l-, E0'9ttZSi" of the total cost of the work shown below) t6 provide
security for the following:
IMPROVEMENT
Rsof modification per T.O.V. approved design.
Now' THEREFORE, in conslderailon of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and material necessary lo perform and complete all improvemdnts, on or before
----Jlry lrt qor . The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with allplans and speciticalions liled in the
oflice of the Community Development Department, lhe Town ot Vail, and to do allwork
incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the lollowing:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, skelches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approvgd by any of lhe above-referenced ' governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the salisfaction of, the Town Engineer,,the Town Building Official, or other '
official from the Town of Vail. as affected by spceial disrriers nr 56n1ics districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Development Department and public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee psrformance ol its obligations as set lorth hsrsin, the
Doveloper agrees lo provide security and coilaterat as foilows:
Page 1 of 3
?t)
wocr' srar Rank (name of bank in Eagle county) as the security lor lhe
improvements sel forth above if there is a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth
above for anolher form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarante6 the tiithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and the performance of the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by lhe Town of alternatlve collateral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, 4or shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible lor any accident, loss oi damage happening or occurring to the work specified in
this Agreement prior to the completion and accepiance of the same, nor shall the iown, nor
any officer or employee lhereof, be llable for any persons or property injured by reason of the
nature of said work, but all of said lidblllties shall and are hereby asiumed by ihe Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any ol its officers, agents ol employees may become suUlect to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereofj that arise out of or ire
based upon any performance by the,Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or defqnding any such loss, claim, damagL, tiabitity or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in hddition tb any other liablllty wnich-the Devetoper may have.
f 5. lt is mutually agreed that ths Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize for partial release ot the collateral dbpositei wiin-tne Town for each category
of improvement at such lime as such improvemenls are constructed in compliance witn ln '
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount of the collateral that is belng held be reciuced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town delermines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements
conlemplated hereunder are not constructed in compliance with thaplans and specifications
set forlh in lhis Agreement on or before the date sei forlh in Paragraph 2, the Town may, bul
shall not be required to, redeem the letter ol credit as necessary to complete tre unfinijhed
improvements. The Eank shall release such funds upon written request from the Town stating
that the improvements have not been completed as iequired by this agreement. The Bank
shall not require lhe concurrence of the developer prior to release of the funds to the Town
nor shall the Bank be required to verify independently that such improvements have not been
completed as required by thls agreement, but shall release such fundg solely upon the Town's writlen request.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be certified lo lhe treasurer of Eagle County'to be
collected in the same mann-er as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied adainst such property. lf
the permit hotder fairs or refuses to comprete the creanup and randscaiing, as oetiheo in inis chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zbniig code.
7. The Developer warrants all work and material lor a period ol one year alter acceplance of all work referred to in this Agreement by the Town ii such work is located on Town of Vailproperty or within Town of Vail right-of-wiy pursuant to Section 17.16.250.
. & The parties hereto mulually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to time, provided that such amendmenti be In writlng aid executed-by altparties hereto.
Dated the day and year first above wrltten.
lrrevocable letter of credit * 441 in tho amount of $-:',:s-o--ol_ with
Page 2 of 3
. A,
STATEOFCOLORADO )
) ss.
couNTY oF EAGLE )
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
T( l^fitliil"'":l&1?i"B'i flt'f/:flrfl,XirTi''"" 3'orc m! rhia {- dav or
STATE OF COLOBADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
r/i/,nv
ss. ,
vement Agreemenl wss ecknewlndgod blloro ^r rnrQ(u, ,,
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission *pv"r, ffi31
BANK
STATE OF OOLORADO
COUNry OF EAGLE
83,
| 0_b,y
PLANNER.dOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
The l9regglng 9eveleBer lmprgvcmeil Agrecmcnt yye$ sehnatylodsec bolsrc me thl$ *- *" day ot ,,, ,,, ,- , ,
Wtness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Upd.t.d 920,91
Notary Public
Pag€ 3 ol 3
ROOF TDiruS$,IEI|rS
BOVBI RESII'ENCE l€bruery 13. 1996
Prmelltlon - 8/hrr rt 580.00
Re-Frane, Sh€ath - 8/hrs at 550.00
Chlmney Bulld and Attach - 6/hrs at S5O.OO
Re-Roof and trlaahlng - Ace Roofing
Stucco and Trln - Cor€ Range Masonry
lllecallaneous t{aterlala
MlBc€llan.ou. Labor - 10/hra at 950.00
IO.ilAI. RE-BUILD
a
s 400.00
$ 400.0o
$ 3OO.OO
s 500.00
$ 300.00
$ 200.00
s s00.00
$2.600.00
IE
IRREVOCABIJE IIETTER OF CREDIT #221
Effective Date: February 14, 199G Explration Dat,e: ,.Tune 29, 199d
Town of Vail Re: Developer Improvement AgreemenE
Gent,lemen:
we here.bt open our rrrevocable IJeLLer of crediE in your favor,avairabre to you by drafts at sight drawn on Lhe west,star Bank for any sum or sums not exceeding in total the sum of THREE THousAlID
TWO II{'NDRED FIFTY DOLLARS Al[D NO/CEr{TS (93,250.00) for the account of BECK AND ASSOCTATES.
Each draft must bear upon its face the clause, rDrawn under lrett,er of credit No. 221 dated February r4trgg6 of weststar Bank, Avon,Colorado. ,'
The amount of each draft, which is negotiated pursuant to this credit, together with the date of negotiation, *uit be endorsed on Ehe reverse side of the Letter of Ciedit.
we hereby agree that drafts drawn under this Let,ter of credit and in compliance wit,h its E,erms, shall" be promptly honored if presented t.o WesE.Star Bank on or before February 14, Lgg6.
This LeEter of Credit shall expire on ilune 29, 1995.
weststar Bank represents and warrants to the Town of vail, that it has E.he fuIl authority and power t.o issue this Letter of credit in the tot.al- amount and for the period of time stated herein; said authority being pursuant to the Laws of t.he united states, or to the stat.e or t,erritory which governs the estabrishment and regulaLion of west,star Bank, and the weststar Bankrs charter, by-Jaws and other applieable rules, and regulations ad.opted pursuant thereto. Should it be necesser\/ for t-he Rr
commissioners, Easte counLy, ro fi1? ",lT t,iT" "Ti51 :j ":?:l::Lhis rrrevocabl-e I-,etter of credit, weststar Bank hereby waives all venue rights and submit.s to the jurisdiction of the District court in and for the County of Eag1e, State of Colorado.
Beck and Aseociat,es Letter of Credit #221 Page T$ro
A]r drafLs hereunder must, be drawn on or before ,June 29 , rggl,
Sincerely,
WestStar BANK n (, | ,Y n Y.I^ L./ $q
Dan E. Godec
Execut.ive Vice president
t L,u Lvr!,U tUL lV'("1 uu,,lpssocrnres FA)(No, iqllra P,02
sLopEBrvprr,veM
*,,rilffiifrffi:,"
. THts AGHEEMTMT ,i..-.'.. __..
;*#ffi;fr*
rxq#ilTi$:Jit;Hf Htff:Jff i',gJfl ii,'Ji;iJ,try,#:iirtrfl ilf :$:l;H[.
g;0."fl.'Tii,?lliilff f ffi ,il;ilil:BfJf ;iJB,fl ,!?,i,Hi:Hifff, i[,".#J,1,,n,
.frfifitrffi,$*ffi ii:il,tfl,i,:fl illiH::ff Jtff f
,tfitl1,noado,,ar
' IMPFIOVEMENT
Roof, uodific.rbion pcr T.o-v. approvcd rlesigq.
*'."H#inT5i,1ifil[n fi f.|{flfiT&:j,f ijif#jl, mu,ua, coyenan,s and
m*-U*,*h-ni#;*i*,ffi**#nt*',Nr,1*
a, Such othcf de
;m*mffiffi*t"**iffiffffiffi
ou ,.rofu,. *,1: ifff ,1y.tJffi Hf :f,iji: il?or's obriq a r ions as 3e,orrh h orsrn, the
Pago I ot g
ft.q-c.u-vo, IuE
+
0rrrE oF cglgnAnn
SIATF OF66Lgr6$s
couNtY gF EAOLE
HorfiFuuf------
ruicq bhu1|ss00rA.l,Hs FA){ N0, 3OUplB
slATFoFcafu,,A.o ) R-'*#*'{E'*2."/
corrrrysF
'.A.LE i*,
'lr'w|l":'#hwwwy,7ltiiJir4r,n,ri,*no&,ocq,dr"n,,",,111strJ,,,',ys1
Wtncrr rrr; h|,lf, q6d orduiif sesL
P, 04
FIfi nc-n,ffi lililrvniTEffi F-MET'-_
I
oouNry oF uGL.
i
*. '
l g - by
hE tutogolag orvelopor lmr '- - v' =---.--. "* ^:"*yr, salnorvhdln.l brfo,| n," rhl!*._dayor_
,. Wttnesc fty firad qnd oFrhl seat,
. My corn c9i66 alpfus!; .
'e*fur&&
Witn6r6 my hrfld arrd olrgrl
MY cotnnhtbn o*ir"r, b,
-_rltll wss, rcfinovj!.kJsd b "ton n t#Jt^,
t|orJd!
o\
0ASH DEPqEI FORMAT
Legal DescriPtion: Lot': Block "'-'
suOaivr:son e+""+*"-- Filing -
"i,15,"!5tBfrX8h*"gt;n".6t lttn',u"r: 0 1 :0000'22026
Dale ol ElPira$on:
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS 4GBEE|vIENT, pado. and entered into this l!- dqv
" PriftA'tnlt;|tiil
uno"rinn'i'.Il'-..-o'oiiiii.lll;Jtlherelnaf tercalledthe'Developet
oFvnrr- (iereinalter called the "Town")'
REAS, the Developer,^as a condltlon o.f anR.1o1{::,ff#
iii ft] iiiniJ'i;;.dfit. a Developer lmprovement
Resi dence
WHE
plans, dated d/29
lttf
Agreement; and
WHEREAS,theDeveloperisobligatedtoprovidesecurity.orcollateralsu||icientinthe
judgment of the Town to ma-Xe'reasonab-le proUsfin!'fir totpfdfion ol certain improvements
set torth below; ano
WHEREAS,theDeveloperwishestoprovidecollateraltoguaranteeperformanceof
this Agreement, incruoini-co-n;il;ti;; ; me'aOovi-reierenced improvemenis by means ol the
lollowing:
DoveloperagreestoestablishlgThdepositwiththeTownofVailinadoltaramount
of $-:.ooe.Ea- 1125% otthe total cost'5irne'worr tno*n below) to provide security
for the following:
IMPROVEMENT.
Landscapi ng and drivewaY Paving'
NOW, THEREFOBE, in consideration of the tollowing muluatcovenants and
,grr"t";tt,'tne oevetoper and the Town agree as follows:
l.TheDeve|operagrees,atitssolecostandoxpenses,toJurntshallequipment
and material necessary i;i;'fffi;d complete allimprovements' on or before
{nt,t t , tl1b .. - -.'"il"';;;dd; ,nlrr coftlei;, in i sooo"otkmanlike manner, all
imDrovements as ilsreo ,#;;; ffiiorn., *iiil;iiil;r ino specificaions liled in the
o(iice of the community Development Departme;i'il; i;il of y-1!' and to do all work
incidenlal thereto "..oto:t6'6
inoln comptiance with the following:
a.Suchotherdesigns'drawings,maps,speci|ications,sketches.andothermatter
submitted bv the Develop" ro o' Iip-ti* Of yt ol the above-referenced
gou"rn,n'";,'"i"it'r'".. dri."',0 *o-r['.nalbe done und-er.the inspection of' and
ro rhe sarisfacrion ot, the Town ;;il;; ttrl row.n.auildino official, or other
otficiat trom the Town ot valt, ". ;it;ild ov tp".i"r oi"tricii or servics districts'
as their respective interest r")/ riilit, t;e $;ll not b.e deemed comptete until
.pprouuO
'hO-accepted
tt totdlitO oy tnt fo*n ol VallGommunlty
o ruuropmlni iJpthtttti*d P ublic W-orks D epartmont'
2.Tosecureandguaranteeper|.ormanceofitsob|igationsasset|orthherein,the.
Developer agrees to piouiO" s-ecurity and collateral as follows:
Page 1 ol 3
A cash deposit account in the amounl.g',1ffi.*-'*#':ilflff lil;5ilin'J;il ;t;;; agEni, snarl provlde the security'lc
""i!iihi"r"o;r
the Agreement bv Developer'
3.TheDeve|opermayatanytimesubstitutethecollatera|origina||yseltorth
above tor another,om oi[oir.*f"ir..,Jn99rq to t"#io*n to guarantee the faithful
comptetion of Jhose ,,.piiuJrir..ir',rroiio ..t.ttiiiutto ln' p6ttotmance of the terms ol thls
Asreement. sr.n ,...piJ;;'; by th;i;*t .t .riJtli.tr"i to*":ttttr shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any ofiicer or employee th-ereof' be liable or
responsible lor anv "tt'lJti'io"'t!
o*-;99 1a#;il;;Jcuirinsrorne
work specified ln
this Asreement prior ,o th'';;;lttigt lg lt-t-tii"ttt"titnt tameiLo-Lsnallthe Town' nor
anv oilicer or employee iiiliJ;iio; rdgre tor anipirsini o'p'optttv injured bv reason of the
naiure or said work, or,'"iilj ,io ri"uititi", th.il fi;;;; nt'iu' tti'nied bv the Developer'
TheDeve|operherebyagree.stoindemni|yandho|dharm|esstheTown,andanyo|lts
olicers, agents ano employees 1oflnst111r..rJr,
.rurttlarttg"'.or llabllltles to which the
io*n o, a-ny or its orncirs,'199$i":.lt''.y^'-'^ill'gi::ln:i:'l'*'i::'1il,:iiili::
lli:r*l'l;fiHs'fi"J.:'3il1fri[i'"x]:*1il;#;;;' "Jtn!
DevJoper sharr reimburse
the Town for any
"no
iil.grr or oiner,"rpent..'i.utonudty incurreo bv the Town in
connection witn inves.gaiirig oi OerenO,.Lg- .1I .r.i...io,tltr"im' dqTlg;' liabilitv or action'
This indemnity provisiolnli,irin" in aooiti,rn tb
"""tv'tt-nl" r"nility which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed.that the-D-eveloper 1aV' aqpiV^io th^e Town and the Town
sha' aurhorize ror pa,iilli'ereise ot rhe conateni'oEpbrit.ir r;iin.ll",T:*t for each category
o| improvement "t
,u.iiti,ie ai sucn i'p,ou.'?nlJ?ie constructed,in comp|iance with a||
otans and specitications ".i.lrrr...O
n.r"unO'Ji'"nl.t*gitOtl.theTown' Under no
condition wiil the
"rounior',i.'coiraterar.rna,
il"fJ"i;;d'b; reduced below the amount
tl..i."i1, 6 complete such improvements'
6'lttheTowndeterminesthatanyoftheimprovements,contemplatedhereinare
not constructeO in "oriilian"u
*'itn tne ptans.,ani ip"i'it''!"tittt set'lorth heiein by the date set
lorth in parasraph '' 'n['?"*-^'t"v'
uui snar;;"t;" ;''i;i; igt*'I'9t* from the cash
deposit such tunds ,Jil;|. nr.Lr.urv to .tt p[t" tn'e unrinisned improvements' The
Town shart rerease #hjird,6;;ir'r*rittJ','[ir"ri"r the starl of the communily
Development o,ptn'it"Jniii;titilth"ith" i*fit;;;;i; nave nott^een completed as requrreo
by the agreem.nl fii"'iown siall not requ#t#';;ntu*ntu ol th-e'devetbper prior to the
retease of rhe funds,'.rr'iiiil ine rown. ue d;ili; t;rifv.independentlv that the
improvemenls have #;;;.;rpleted as ffiffi LV rn't'ng"t;*ent' but shall release sucn
funds solely upon the request of the Communiiy Oeut[opment Department'
|fthecostsofcompletingtheworkexceedtheamountotthedeoosit,theexcess'
tooether with interest at twetve percent pr, rnrrt,'tn.i6: l]i:1,"?"nst
the property and
miy oe collected nv'"iriirrii.r"r"v o" c.rtiiiuJ to the treasurer ol Eaole county to be
corected in the same manner as detinquent ;";il;;;;;; tevieo-aiiinst suih property' lf
the permit noUer tai[ oi;;i;;;; to corirpretJt"n. .ittnup and landscaiing' as delined in this
chapter, such faitureiiirfu..r shall be .onii.i.i "-uitjiuiion
of the Zonins Code'
T.TheDeve|operwarrants.a||.workandmateria||oraperiodo|oneyeara|ter
acceptance or ",,"oir
iuisuli'G in tnir nd;#nt ov the Town p-ursuant to section
r7.16.2s0 if such worx is located on Town ;ifl;'iffidt;ty or wittrin Town of Vail 6ght'of'way'
B.Thepartiesheretomutua||yagreethatthisAgreementmavbeamendedfrom
time to time, provid!;'iiiild;r.nor'rnil'[; ffititild ind executed bv allparties hereto'
Dated the day and year first above written'
Page 2 ol 3
STATE OF COLORADO ). )ss.
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTYOFEAGLE )
Witness mY hand and offlcialseal'
My commission exPlres: -+lt 5 ltl
Notary Public
belore me this
udst€d 928/Ba
@PMENT
Page 3 ol 3
rI;I)-l'J-r J;rlJ It'Crq rl LEt\ | tsK v) J49>U|V Y.gL
THE GARDEN CENTER OF EAGLE-VAIL
;iFEi;ili Matthews fr Assoclotes LandscoPlng' Inc.
Londscope Achilecture qnd Construction
i'J'i iiii;-v.n. i'ri;"a" sr650 us.^. ' (303l!{'5911:lc09lry!9ljt
February 8, 1996
Beck & Associster
780 No$ingham Road
Avort. Colorado
Rs: Landrcape Instaltf,tion at lhe Hovey Re*idence'
DcarKiu:
Thenh you for calliry fylonhcws & Associutos.wittr your lund.rcapo needr a! Ilovev Resid€nce. We
apprccla|g tbo opportunity ro hetp crearc s lanclscape iiliJt'iiiit-tjliol-oa*A vntue *a acsthetics to
your project
Mntthews & Associatcs is a Landscape Architecl,ure derrign/build finq, speciuli.zing in residential
urrd Cornmercial landscape constflJction^ ln addition to our dqignihutld capabtUUes we also Ilsv€
inicotion ancl mai.ntenaniB aivisions, along with The Garden Ce-ntcr of Eagle-Vuil' a retoil garden
""nTcr.
thes" divisions allow Martbsws &-Associates to be a full scrvicc latrdscape compony'
Enclosed is an osti-orate for plant installation uken from tho landraapc plan' which you supplied
(Ses rrtuched Ludecape Materifll Take-Ofi)
This cstirnate takes into account tbc following considerations:
It is ussumed that the $upptied grarle will be within l/10 of a foot of thc desiled finisl
;Hb. If dy g*ai"d ai"ltiiiopEoil arr needed, they will bc supplied nt tinrc & mat€riuls
ra(cs,
Tlv, estimated cott to install the attaclpd pldnt materlat is $3,450.AA (Thrce Thousand Four
II wtdred F ifty DoI ln rs ) -
Plcsse call with any question^r.
Sincerely,
Richard H. Leeuau, Jr.
Landscapc Architcct
TOTRL P.E1
,Q
coNSTRUCrrOil, ]NC.
Spnsr,nol
PBOPOSAL SUBMTTTED TO:
Eteck and Assnciatesn I nc.
F. O. lt,=x 4tl3rn Vail, tro 8l6EB
Afl of fh€ above wo* to b€ completsd in a substantial and rrc*manlike manno, tor the sum ot **:t3r gara. AA**Thr.ee Thausand Eight Hundred dol lar.s and n,_r/1OO
IMPoBTANT: The lerms and condilions slatod on lhe rev€rs€ side heroot are expresslymade a part ot thiscontract, This proposalshallnot become a binding contract unlosa and untilthe Acceptance ol Proposaland confirmation by conlractor on the revors€ side have been executod. This proposaltmusr b€ accsplod as provided and deliversd to Bam Constnrction, Inc., _3A_ days kom above date, or shall €xpire.
'To accept thlr propoeal, ploaee rlgn back ol
whltc copy and r.turn to Elam Construc{on,Inc. Etam Constructlon, Inc. shatt not b.
bound hereln to oxocute a contrsct unloss tho
ownel ordvldar iellnttclrarv .vld.n..r ^t r't-
Proposal
El t7/93
Date ol Plans:
4;dh
:*""[tffilYt0 $
,"Ruu'*,E#.
o057
P.O. Box 11
Edwards, Colo}(303) 926-5411
Page 10f
Job Name & Address:
Hnvey Residence trav i n6 Westhaven Circle
Vai I
We hereby propoes:
l. )
e.)
) J")
4.)
Prepare +Dr.-.
Furnish
trf area
Fpply a
Furni=h
1,41A 5F
tt, '"
". . ._.
subgradr for roadbere end paving-subgrade to be left at I@ of a foot by excavating'cc,ntiactor
and plaea 4', af 3/4 roadbase to caver apprcrx. 1r41O SF fon a new driveway
soil eterilant to pncpared rsadbase to inhibit weed growth.
and place 3" of new asphalt paving to same area of app'.,Jx.
Respectlully submitted
ELAM CONSTRUCTION, INC.
hv x,*n A-
Phone: 949- 18OO
a
TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REOUEST
(Request lorm musl be given to the Secretary to the Town Manager by 8:00 a.m. Thursdays.)
MEETING DATE:January 16.1996
tprepaie a separate Agenda Request for each agenda item. lf the agenda
item will be discussed at both a Work Session and an Evening Meeting' be
certain to check both boxes in this section and indicate time needed during
each meeting.)
o
Work Session
XX Site Visit
XX Evening Meeting
TIME NEEDED:-
TIME NEEDED:30 min
TIME NEEDED:30 min
An appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's (PEC) denial of a request for a
heighi variance to allow f-or a residence, currently under construction, to exceed the 33-foot
neilnt timitation lor residentialstructures. The pioiect is located at 1339 Westhaven Ci$lelLot-,
23,-Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD #4). " // rf ' '/l"(il rvj--
.^^.^^^^.i6^ tt. ^^A iirra rJa'arr ( /1 ^Vw'
WILL THERE BE A PRESENTATION ON THIS AGENDA ITEM BY NON.TOV STAFF?
NO.
XX YES. Specifics: Applicant's Statement
WILL THE PRESENTATION OF THIS AGENDA ]TEM REOUIRE ANY SPECIAL EQUIPMENT?
xx No.
YES. Specifics:
WILL THERE BE MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET FOR THIS ITEM?
NO.
XX YES. lf yes, is the material also lor public distribution?
XX Yes. PEC Memo, minutes and copy of appeal request letter'
NO.
ITEM/TOPIC:
hial of the variance request.
The applicant is in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon 9u99iyiligl: ^,The lrirlrovement Location Certificate (lLC) submitted by the applicant indicates that sections ol
three sbparate rool ridges were conslructeb at heights e1c9e!ing the 33joot height restriction.for
residential structures. ihe ridges in question are tlbeted A, g anO C, starting at the lowest of the
ridges and going up to the highest. See the attached site plan and elevation drawings.
A.i"iOi^g t61ne-inierpotatedlxisting grades provided by Intermountain Engineering (based o.n
the originit topograpfiic survey), and'tne riOge neight figure-s provided by Eagle Valley Surveying
iiiCj, ficg"r A, 6, dnO C werd constructed i maximum-of 8.4 inches above the 33-foot height
fimitition] The'applicant requested that the PEG grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges
at the existing, cbnstructed heights. The PEC undnimously denied the.requested height va.riance
by a uote ot +'-0. mey made thie finding that granting the r-equested height variance would be a
grant of special privilege to the applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Statf is recommending denial of the applicant's request to overturn the PEC decision'
Applicant: Bill Anderson representing Mr. and Mrs -^"^" ( /r7 n t --- I r. /pianner: Randy stouder
**_'" ":'o 'v'' ' cr''u '"""' ^/J')*ot h{,
; I) l, l,t6 L'CI"
@'(l'w^,',v1x
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
ouder. Comm unitv Develo
Employee Signature/DePartment
lleveryone\council\requests\hovey j 1 6
A flrzz,^V,[r" *
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
nrl\91 The applicant is in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision.-['ae>--f The lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) submitted by the applicant indicates that sections of
t' three separate roof ridges were constructed at heights exceeding the 33{ool height restriction for
residential structures. The ridges in question are labeled A, B and C, starting at the lowest of the
ridges and going up to the highest. See the attached site plan and elevation drawings.
According to the interpolated existing grades provided by Intermountain Engineering (based on
the original topographic survey), and the ridge height figures provided by Eagle Valley Surveying
(lLC), ridges A, B, and C were constructed a maximum of 8.4 inches above the 33{oot height
limitation. The applicant requested that the PEC grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges
at the existing, constructed heights. The PEC unanimously denied the requested height variance
by a vote of 4-0. They made the finding that granting the requested height variance would be a
grant of special privilege to the applicant, . i - ! \ / \tl-O beAval y"rhS (,tt&tl(fVLoc(S
STAFF RECOMMENDATION;
Staff is recommending denial of the applicant's request to overturn the PEC decision.
Please turn to page two of the staff memo to the PEC, included in the council packet.
ltem B states the findings that the PEC shall make before granting a variance.ataff and the
PEC believe that finding 82 has been met, i.e. that granting the variance will not have a
detrimental effect on surrounding properties or the general public. However, both Staif and the
PEC believe that findings B1 and 83 have not been met. We believe that granting the variance
would be a grant of special prvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties located in
the same zone district. We find that the strict litteral interpretation of the height regulation is
necessary to achieve the objectives of the zoning ordinance regarding height control, and such
litteral enforcement will not deprive the applicant of the privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district. There are no extraordinary circu;nstances related to thq property
that do not exist on other properties in the same r:T Ol:t,,.: ,,^^t
t^ ifu\( "W.{4 'y &-*r ,KtklTu fk? I
b"tJ 4 fi^t t/a, nL!,
fl,re du l-fu v^r
&4,'hyc
ffiQnahre 0'r",1's14'*l fl*
ffi: ^liq,-k Yfv*'!f{,; ffil^v*W -[[i"ttw>ffiffi*1^ir^l /W^/f1 \frkwan4lt'S is.S /e.it ioil ,1,"t
cr;^ r u;n/^ra'r'{f'L{$ '{t- n1^"'J;f;;,
;,?(o( /' 7a"u i,?u t Tt''l"v1/^ - 0. /. ^c/n-/ /. & /*/(
$,*+r'4
('/'>1 nF/t-**t{^!"4 asb'/ '7 - ' ' +==z:
\ , t | .,,rr,/.0 tArl,h@ -'-':<{'{-.r*iffn^
'b' ( /'*'nt^dott^^6ftfldr T,^f,"_Ue
tt f) lll ;+, ' o'0 ,j
4( I " ,( balt(Prl\t'\ \ I Wt"-W;;:;#krw[^c ,TL'&/ \. {^ tntffiiw#"
il'{l- 9-3 n'd+D*- @s &ot! - f-,rflit #*t$.. Yi'"
M-oq{a;3 tV,tt:
r\,i@ {orrr{ -- ftb{< 6 a/e"'{*'^-..{L+
":,ffi-;W' ^(k lcrt e-; '@@
'
"(rl
*. L /r s c r^t-il)t"[A**crl-Uen&*rl^ 6]^^^^{ (L'^"&r ^a r€C or h'',tr l$l-/cl
BACKGRO_qNq RATIOryALE: On December20, 199s, rhe appticant met with the Design Review Board to request a determination of siiniticant
--
site constraints and the opportunity to separate the duplex struiture proposed for Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing in accordance with Section 18.54.050(l) of the Municipal Cbde (see att-achment 1). Upon
review by the DRB, a motion was made to deny the applicants request
since the DRB could not find evidence of significant site constraintb. tne motion passed unanimously (4-0).
{ fe.n9r from the applicant dated December 29, 1995, appealing the DRB decision, has been attached (see attachment 2). In ttre'ipplica-nt's letter,
he refers to the intent of the Design Review Guidelines (dection
18.54.010) as a possible basis for overtuming the DRB decision. A copy of Section'18.54.010 from the Municipal Cod6 has bee attached for
reference (see attachment 3).
u rAFF. HEq9MMENDATION: Upon review of the applicant's separation
request, staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the DR'B
Ll,5 v
ISdp.t,l. 8.
Randy Stouder
decision of December 20, 1995, of deniar. In staff's opinion, the applicant
has not demonstrated the existence of significant site constraints 6n tne
lot as required in Section 19.54.050(l) of the Municipal Code.
An appeal of the Planning and Environmental commission's (pEC) denial of a request for a height variance to allow for a residence, currently under
construction, to exceed the 33-toot height limitation for residential
structures. The project is located at 1399 westhaven circle/Lot 23, Glen
Lyon,subdivision (sDD #4). Applicant Bill Anderson representing Mr. and
Mrs. Hovey.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: The appticafon ts in the process of
constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision. The
lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) submitted by the applicant
indicates that sections of three separate roof ridgeswere constructed at heights exceeding the 33-foot height restriction f,or residential structures.
The ridges in question are labeled A, B and c, starting at the lowest ol the
ridges and going up to the highest. See the attachedlite plan and
erevation drawings. According to the interpolated existing grades
provided by Intermountain Engineering (based on the origiial topographic
survey), and the ridge h_eight figures provided by Eagle Vlttey SLrvlyihg (lLC), ridges A, B, and C were constructed a maximum of g.4 inches
above the 33-foot height limitation. The applicant requested that the pEc
grant a height variance to retain the roof ridges at the existing,
constructed heights. The pEC unanimousry denied the requEgted height variance by a vote of 4-0. They made the finding that graniC0Ntre
requested height variance wourd be a grant of sfeciar privirege to the
applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending deniatof the
applicant's request to overturn the pEC decision.
8. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING STARTTIMES BELOW:(ALI TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE ANO SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
5:50 P.M.
rHE NExr vArLrowN J,l^il'l- llou.o" woRK sEssroN wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 1/23196, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL CHAMBEHS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSTON wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,2t6E6, BEGTNN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. rN Tov couNctL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 26196, BEGINN|NG AT 7:30 p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.|||l slgl!a199a99 interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. please cail 47g-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD tor iniormation.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY,JANUARY9,1996 U
2:00 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
2:00 P.M. 1. Vail Valley Marketing Board Overview.
Ross Boyle
3:00 P.M. 2. Housing Background and Update of Status.
Andy Knudtsen
Steve Thompson
Tom Moorhead
4:00 P.M. 3. A request by East West Hospitality, developer of the Covered Mike Mollica Bridge Building, to proceed througn the planning process to allow Peter Dann for the expansion of a private bric-k paver watfwiy onto Town of Vail Land.Location: southwest corner of the covered Bridgir pocket park in Vail Village.
ACTION REOUESTED OF qOUNCtL: Approve/deny the appticant,s
request to proceed through the planning process. lf approveO, the applicant wourd be authorized to proceed to the Design'Review Board, to obtain design approvar for a "mini-praza" adjacent to the residential
condominium entrance, located at the northwest corner of the covereo
Bridge Building, (see attached site plan).
BAOKGRoUND RATTONALE: The proposed "mini-praza" wourd encroach approximatery 5'onto Town owned property. This property is one of the Town open-space parcels, and is currenily zoned Outdooi Recreation District. Although staft does not berieve that the "mini-praza" *oriJ -
negatively impact the covered Bridge pocket park, staif believes that the use would be inconsistent with the purpose section of the outdoor
Recreation Zone District. Section 1 g.33.01 O_purpose states:
The Outdoor Recrealion District is intended to preserve
undeveloped or open-space lands from intensive development
whire permitting outdoor recreationar activities that provide
opportunities for active and passive recreation areas, facilities and uses."
sraEE TEC9MMENDATTON: The staff recommendation is for deniar or the-applicant's request ro proceed through the pranning pro""r.. in"staff does not berieve that the request fol a mini-plaza,-o'eoicaieo ,oi"ry to private residentiar use, wourd be consistent with ihe purpose section Lf the Outdoor Recreation Zone District.
4:20 P.M. 4. Information Uodate.
4:30 P.M. S. Council Reoorts.
4:40 P.M. 6. Other.
6-,Lg NP [ . 7. site_Visit re: an appear to the Town councir, pursuant to section ' ueorge Huther 18.54.090 of the Municipal Code, of the Design Review Board decision to deny the Olesonly'olinn duplex separation request tor a proposeO- - -'
, f^:iq9,T:.t"_?g constructed on Lot 1_1, Resubdivision or'roi z, Btock 1,
^
; ,.h Vait Viilage 12th Fiting/3275 Katsos Ranch Road.
r . \ l'' AcloN REouESTED oF couNctl: Visn site..-'+L \'.,#,, --TGT-;(''tt^'Y(,
-;v 1'nf rwj
p rArF HEgUMMENDATIONI: Upon review of the applicant,s separation request, staff recommends that the Town councir uphord the DRB iecision of December 20, 1995, of denial. ln staff's opinion, the applicant nas-not demonstrated the existence of signiricant siie constraints on the rot as required in Section 18.S4.050(l) ol the Municipal Code.
8:30 P.M. l
Randy Stouder fn appell of the Planning and Environmentar commission's (pEC) deniar of a request for a height variance to allow for a residenc", irrrentty ,n0"r construction, to exceed the 3s-foot height limitation for residentiat structurei.The project is located at 1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD #4).
Uphold/modifu/overturn the pEC's
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: The applic*t& ,. in the process ot constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision. The lmprovement Location certilicate (lLC) submitted by the applicant indicates that sections of three separate roof ridges were constiucted at heights exceeding the 33-foot height restriction foiresidential structures. The ridies in question are rabered A, B and c, starting at the rowest ot the ridjes-ino going up to the highest. see the attached s'ite pran and erevation driwings.According to the interporated existing graoei provided by Intermountiin
Engrneenng (based on the original topographic survey), and the ridge height figures provided by Eagte Vaitey Suiveying (rLC), riiijes A, g, anl C wJre constructed a maximum of 8.4 inches above the B3-loot height rimitation.The applicant requested that the pEC grant a height variancito retain the rool ridges at the existing,. constructeo neignts. The pEC unanimousry
gelled the. requeetgd height variance by a-vote of 4-0. They made the Itnorng that grant6B{the requested height variance would be a grant of special privilege to the applicant.
denial of the variance re uest.
9:00 P.M.
9:05 P.M.
6. Town Manager,s Report.
7. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING STARTNMES BELOW:
(ALL TIIIES ARE APPROXIXAIE ANO SUBJECT TO CHANGE}
rHE NEXr vArL rowN
"l,i^iJ,L
llou*" woRK sESSroN WILL BE ON TUESDAY,1I2gE6, BEGINNING AT 2:OO P.M. IN TOV COUHCII CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,2t6rg6, BEG|NNTNG AT 2:00 p.M. rN Tov couNcrl CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,2t6ts6, BEGTNNTNG AT 7:30 p.M. lN Tov councrr_ CHAMBERS.
|||ttl
!ls-n ]?ryugge interpretation available upon requesl with 24 hour notification. please cail 47g-z114voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
C:\AGENDA.TCE
7:30 P.M. 1.
7:35 P.M. 2.
7:40 P.M. 3.
Mike Mollica
Michael Barclav
8:10 P.M. 4.
George Ruther
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1996
7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
CITIZEN PARTICI PATION.
Consent Agenda:
A. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance,
First Amendment to the Town of Vair porice and Fire emproveei'
Pension Plan.B. Resolution No. 2, series of 'r996, a Resorution designating cororado Nationar Bank, as a depository for the funds of the rdwn of viit Pension Plan as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its
ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado.c. Resolution No. 3, series of 1996, a Resorution designating cororado
National Bank, as a depository for the funds of the iown -ot vait +sz Pension Plan as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its
ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado.
ordinance No. 2, series ol ]999, sgcold reading of an ordinance amending
Special Development District No.30, The VailAtntetic Club, and '-"'i
amending the development plan in accordance with chapter 1g.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto.
4\q:[qN_BF9_l.f E STE p o F CO U NCJ!: Approve/m od ifyldeny O rd i nance No.2, Series of 1996 on second reading.
HAcKqFoUND RATIONALE: Please see the attached memorandum from
!h.e 9!aJlto the Planning and Environmental commission dated December
1 1, 1995 and Exhibits A-F attached to that memorandum.
srAFF RECOMMENDATTON: Approve ordinance No. 2, Series of 1996 as presented.
An appeal to the Town Council, pursuant to Section 1g.54.090 of the Municipal code, of the Design Review Board decision to oeny tne olesonAy'olinn duplex separation request for a proposed residence io be constructed on Lot 11, Rp.subdivision of Lot7, Block'l , Vail Village 12th Filing/3275 Katsos Ranch Road.
AUl.Lgr\. flEgutsStED OF COUNCIL: Uphold/overturn/overturn with modifications the Design Beview Board's decision to deny the otesonArotinn duplex separation reguesl.
BACKGEOUND RATTONALE: On December 20, 1995, the appticant met with the Design Review Board to request a determination ot signiticant siL cons-traints and the opportunity to separate the duplex structure firoposeolor Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Village 12ih Filing in accordance witn section
1 8.54.050(l) ot the Municipar code (see attaihment 1 ). Upon reuie* oyin"DRB, a motion was made to deny the applicant,s request since the bRB could not find evidence of significant site constraints. The motion p".r"i
unanimously (4-0).
A letter from the appricant dated December 29, 'r995, appearing the DRB decision, has been attached (see_attachment 2). In the appricant,; r"ttt h;refers to the intent of the Design Review Guidelines (section i g.s4oilj ;;a possible basis for overturning the DRB decision. A copy or seciion 18.54'010 from the Municipar code has bee attached tor riierenc" lsee attachment 3).
o
Hl r nnpv
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 8]657
970-479-213V4&2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Department of Community Development
Januarv 11. 1996
Nft. Bill Anderson
P.O. Box 4030
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Bill:
ThankyouforyourfaxofJanuary 9.1996. Inresponsetoyourrequestforaworksessionwith
the Torvn Council regarding the Hovey height variance, I regret to inform you that it is staff s
determination that any appeal of a Planning and Env"ironmental Commission decision must go to
an evening session public meeting with the Towr Council. Although we cannot accommodate
your request for a worksession, rve will conduct a site visit on the aftemoon of the l6th of
January in preparation for a public meeting later that evening. I will schedule enough time for the
site visit, so as to allow for an informal discussion on site regarding the disposition of this issue.
Again, I have scheduled you for both the site r,isit and the evening meeting with the Town Council
on January 16, 1996 in response to your appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's
denial ofyour requested height variance at the Hovey residence.
If any new information results from Intermountain Engineering's review of the topographic
information, please inform me as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please call me at
479-2150.
Sincerely,&t&
Randy Stouder
Town Planner
RS/jr
{2 *'""""^'"*
o o o o
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 07/Fax 970 - 479-2 I 5 7
Office of the Town Attorney
January I l, 1996
Mr. Bill Anderson
Project Manager
Beck & Associates, Inc.
Dear Bill:
VIA TELECOPIER 949-4335
I have been asked to respond to correspondence sent by you to Randy Stouder dated January g, 1996
concerning your appeal ofa PEC denial of a variance request. I am responding in writing as you
requested as a professional courtesy.
The variance process is a procedure in which the applicant and the adjoining property owners have
certain due process rights, procedural and substantive, which are required to be met. These due
process requirements cannot be met at a work session as you request.
Town Council hears such matters in its position as a quasi-judicial body. Due process requires that
notice is properly provided and that the proceeding grants an opportunity for the applicant and
adjoining property owners to present evidence to be considered by Council and then applied to the
zoning regulations.
The Town Council acts formally on both legislative and quasi judicial hearings in its evening
sessions. If there is some specific conflict that can only be accommodated by the hearing being
conducted ai a time other than the first or third Tuesday of the month at or after 7:30 p.m., thai
problem can be addressed. It is my understanding that your appeal is presently scheduled to be
consideredonJanuary 16, 1996 atCouncil'sformalsession. If Icanbeof anyfurtherassistance
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Town Attorney
RTM/aw
xc: Randy Stouder '-l
Pamela A. Brandmeyer
Very truly yours,
$ *""'"""o 'u"*
IE
JAN- 9-96 TUE 16:38
Janurry 9, 1996
FAXN0,303e,1535 trrso ASSOC IATES D nl
Town of Vail
lganmcnt of Cornmunity lJevetopment
75 South Frunrage nmd Wesr veil, CO 8t6t7 Fqrr 1E-2452
Attcntiont Randy Stouder - Revised
Ilear Randy:
Ar a
'lrsulr of our deniar l.v-lEg. for a height varirncc at r 339 wc.rfiaven circre,/Lot 2j, Glcn Lvon $ubdivisior (sDD #b i;; trGfi;ei'*"* scssin *in rr,e i.J'wn council at the
Again' our intcnt is to o?:: t]]! oneolylty b pleseil and discugs the height probtem in ur tnfonrulumeeting we fcer this woutd tJ a-rilucrr befior atmosphcre fur- a gtve and hko
We havc elro rskod Intcrr
riph chcc&. .rtountaiu Enginecmg to r€vicw their original tolb rurvEy, Juct a! a
:t4sqdv'{fl,(( &,n ilt,t sn'
Bill Andenou
Projoct Murager
Bect utd Associater, Inc.
BA/di
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Greg Moffet
Greg Amsden
Kevin Deighan
Henry Pratt
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
January 8, 1996
Minutes
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Jeff Bowen
Dalton Williams
O.ono*D*rsr
ss
STAFF PRESENT:
Mike Mollica
George Ruther
Randy Stouder
Lauren Waterton
Judy Rodriguez
Public Hearing 2:00 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:05 p.m.
Dalton Williams and Jeff Bowen were absent.
1. A request for a Major SDD Amendment to allow for a 485 square foot addition to an
existing condominium in the Gateway Building located at 'l 2 Vail Road, Unit SA/ail
Gateway Plaza Building.
Applicant: Steve Riden representing Vail Apartments Inc.Planner: Randy Stouder
Henry Pratt moved to table item No. 1, item No. 4 and item No. 5 until January 22, 1996.
Greg Amsden seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
2. A request for a building height variance to allow for a residence currently under construction to
exceed the height limit located at 1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD
#4).
Applicant: Bill Anderson representing Mr. and Mrs. Charles Hovey Planner: Randy Stouder
Randy Stouder gave an overview of the proposal. He stated that staff had reviewed the variance
criteria carelully and lound that justification for granting the variance was lacking. According to the
applicant, depth was added to the floors and to the root structure during the construction process
without compensating reductions in the height of the structure. Staff felt that the structural changes
could have been compensated for by reducing floor to ceiling heights. This was not done. Randy
stated that the variance request should be denied because staff finds that approval would be a grant of
special privilege.
Planning and Environmenlal ComrussioD
Minules
January 8. 1996
ll
Bill Anderson from Beck and Associates relerred to a situation in East Vail where a house was 3' over
the height limit and was granted a height variance. He was on the PEC at the time. He stated that the
surveyor made a mistake which resulted in the height increase. He telt that the mistake made on the
Hovey residence was no ditferent than the mistake made on the East Vail residence, both were honest
mistakes- He stated that the Hovey's had nothing to gain from the mistake. Billsaid that he had
contacted the adjoining property owners. The adjacent owners did not have any problems with
granting a variance- They did not feel impacted by the additional height'
Greg Motfet asked for public comment. No one came forward.
Henry Pratt said although the impact is negligible and the neighbors don't care, he feels handcuffed
since the Findings are not met.
Greg Amsden said for practical reasons that the variance should be granted, but based on Code, it
wouid definitely be a grant of special privilege. He felt that he could not grant a variance based on a
review of the criteria and findings.
Kevin Deighan said he agreed with Greg Amsden's comments'
Greg Moffet asked if an ILC was performed after the foundation was poured. He also asked if this
mistake would have been caught by an ILC at that stage?
Bill said no. that structural elements above the foundation had been changed and this caused the
height increase.
Dave Peel said they went from a 10" lloor to 11-7/8". He also explained how the roof structure was
moditied slightly, resulting in additional height.
Greg Moffet said that the height problem was a self imposed hardship and the Board could not grant a
variance.
Bill Anderson mentioned that for on-site construction misiakes, the Board has granted variances in the
past.
Randy Stouder said the East Vail variance was for the Musyl home. That variance was granted
because of a surveyor error. The surveyor used an improper benchmark. Staff recommended denial
even though the entire roof of the structure would have had to be taken off. The PEC did grant that
variance.
Henry Pratt asked if there had been any other height variances granted recently.
Randy Stoudbr said that the Musyl variance was the only one he could recall in the two years he has
been with the Town.
Mike Mollica stated that each variance request has to stand on its own merits and should be judged
individually. Mike Mollica also doesn't remember any other similar requests being granted.
Bill Anderson stated that if this variance was granted that it would not set a precedent for more
variance requests, at least not by him or his company. Beck and Associates has a long track history
pl2nning a:rd Environmental Commrsslog
Minutes
Januarv 8. 1996
fr
for beirg on target with heights and sehacks. We screwed up and made a mistake. He does not want
to tear Lp the roof and destroy the architect's design. He asked the Board to look at the request with
some oommon sense. No one has been adversely effected and no one has gained anything from the
small height increase.
Greg 4gns6an made a motion for denial of the variance request.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously with a vote of 4-0.
Mike Mollica added for the record that the applicant has 10 days to submit a written request for an
appeal to Council. He also said that Council uses the same criteria and findings that the PEC uses.
Bill Anderson stated that the Hoveys want to move in by March 1, 1996 and asked if he could get a
TCO by posting a bond to guarantee that the height overage would be corrected. He did not feel that
the work could be completed prior to March 1.
Mike Mollica said he would be comfortable with bonding.
3. A request for wall height variances and a driveway grade variance for the Koenig residence
located at 795 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 26, Vail Potato Patch subdivision.
Applicant: Eric Johnson for Gary Koenig Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overview and quickly went through the items the applicant changed since the
December 11th meeting. Public Works suggested that a two-foot wide gravel shoulder be replaced
with a guardrail since the shoulder could not maintain a safe slope to the street. Staff does not feel
there would be any negative impacts if the variances were granted. Staff has the greatest concern
with item 2 of the Criteria. lt is the staff's opinion that the hardship is self imposed by the conlractor.
Staff is recommending denial because of a grant of special privilege. George then went over the
conditions in the memorandum, should the PEC grant the request of the variances.
Ray Coutash, owner of Beehive Construction and representing the property owners, the Koenig's and
Dowie's requested the variance be granted based on the landscape changes to save the existing trees.
One other hardship shows the surveyor made a mistake in the original survey and it wasn't discovered
until after the fact. This is the first time he heard about the guardrail request. The utilities run where
the guardrail is proposed. He would prefer plantings, rather than erecting a guardrail.
Greg Moffet asked for public input.
Henry Pratt said again practicality should rule rather than the letter of the law. A lack of a shoulder is a
serious issue for the Town. The driveway can be remedied. Providing a variance wouldn't do anything
lor the walls- There has been an effort to save existing trees. Henry is not optimistic about the wall
variance, honrever.
Greg Amsden said preservation of trees is justilication for granting the variance. There are sile
constraints for the wall height variance. The driveway is a grant of special privilege.
planning and Environmertal CotnndssioD
. Minutes
Januarv 8. l996
'-
Kevin Deighan would support the wall height variance because of the preservation of trees. But he
cannot support the driveway variance.
George Ruther explained the driveway grade problem occurs in the middle section of the driveway. To
resolie the problein they need to cap a portion of the driveway. A solution would be to reconstruct the
middle section. George said if the driveway is reinstalled, the driveway issue could be remedied.
Greg Amsden asked if a portion of the driveway could be removed.
Ray Coutash said no because of the piping for the heating. The entire driveway would need t0 be
removed and reconstructed.
Greg Moffet said the building and site designs are built right up to the legal limit. We are being asked
to giant lorgiveness, rather than permission. Pouring concrete is not an exact science. He feels the
driveway variance would be a grant of special privilege'
Greg Moffet quoted Section 18.54.050 (b) from the Design Guidelines and is inclined lo grant the wall
height variance based on that.
George Ruther explained how and why the third wall was added. lt was at the recommendation of the
consJlting engine6r not to install another wall but to leave the walls as built. Public Works is
recommending a guardrail instead of the shoulder for safety reasons.
Greg Moffet said the client would stand to suffer, if the guardrail were not installed.
Greg Amsden asked if the original plans required a shoulder or guardrail.
George Ruther said no.
Ray Coutash said one of the things he did was to create a shoulder when there was none to begin
with. In the previous 10 years a car could just fall off into the aspen groves. Ray said he eased the
grade and added a shoulder. This satisfied the requirement for a 2:1 slope.
Jerry Law, the Engineer for the job, stated that the wall is 5'2" at the highest point. He said Ray went
above and beyond to fix some of the things that weren't required. He is not big on guardrails because
of aesthetics and feels a rock wall would look better'
Jerry Law said he came on the job December 18th and doesn't understand the utility problem.
Greg Amsden said he would like to break this item into two portions He made a motion that the wall
height variance be approved based on the portion ol the code read by Greg Moffet.
Kevin Deighan seconded the motion.
The watl height variance motion passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
Greg Amsden amended the previous motion with the removal of the guardrail condition. He said
aest-hetically it was not the best solution and suggested the applicant work with staff for a more natural
solution. Hb noted that the location of utilities pose additional problems with adding a guardrail.
Planning and Enviroffnental Commisston
Minutes
January 8, 1996
o
Greg Moflet said some barrier is needed and advised the applicant to work with staff to arrive at a
solution-
Henry Pratt asked Greg Moffet to clarify the motion; is the barrier optional or mandatory?
Greg Amsden asked George Ruther what Public Works wanted.
George Ruther said Public Works wanted to protect the general public and the applicant.
Mike Mollica asked it Public Works is adamant regarding what kind of barrier. He said Public Works
has a problem with boulders as barriers since they can cause more damage.
Kevin Deighan said it is not fair for the applicant to pay for a guardrail.
Mike Mollica said we can move forward with this, but may have to come back before the PEC.
Greg Moffet mentioned that outstanding improvements could all be bonded for.
Kevin Deighan seconded the amended motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
Greg Amsden made a motion that the driveway grade variance be denied pursuant to Finding 81, a
grant of special privilege. He had a question regarding what the Fire Department required.
Kevin Deighan seconded the motion.
Ray Coutash said the fire system is in place. Mike McGee is in favor of supporting a driveway grade
variance. Capping affects the useful lile of the driveway. He has not found a product that anyone can
guarantee thus causing it to be prohibitive for the contractor lo guarantee.
Henry Pratt reminded the Board that it is not fair to put conditions on denials.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
4. A change to the TOV survey policy to require an lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) prior to
a foundation inspection when a project is within three feet of a setback line, has a building
height within six inches of the maximum allowable, has a driveway that is greater than 10% or
for all projects including three or more separate structures.
Planner: Lauren Waterton
TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 22, 1996
Planning and Environme al Commission
Minutes
January 8, 1996
,I t
5. A request for a Minor SDD Amendment to allow for changes to the development plan loc_ated at
Miilrdce phase 3, 1335 Westhaven Drive/Development Area A of the Glen Lyon SDD (SDD No.
4\.
Applicant: Steve Riden representing Gregory Walton
Planner: Jim Curnutte
TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 22, 1996
6. Information UPdate
Mike Motlica had no information updates.
7. Approval of December 1 1' 1995 PEC minutes.
Kevin Deighan made a motion to tabte the minutes until next meeting, since all the members were not
present.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
Kevin Deighan made motion to adjourn the meeting.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:1Spm.
Planning and Environmental Cornmission
Minutes
December 11, 1995
ruilf
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
January 8, 1996
A request for a building height variance to allow lor a residence, currently
under construction, to exceed the height limitations of the Zoning
Ordinance. The residence is located at 'l 339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23'
Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD#4).
Applicant: Bill Anderson, representing Mr. & Mrs. Hovey
Planner: Randy Stouder
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant is in the process of constructing a residence on Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
The lmprovement Location Certilicate (lLC) submitted by the applicant indicates that sections ol
three separate rool ridges were constructed at heights exceeding the 33{oot height restriction for
struclures constructed in the Primary/Secondary Zone District. The ridges in question are
labeled A, B and C, starting at the lowest of the ridges and going up to the highest. See the
attached site plan and elevation drawings. According to the interpolated existing grades
provided by Intermountain Engineering (based on the original topographic survey), and the ridge
height figures provided by Eagle Valley Surveying (lLC), ridges A, B and C were constructed 8.4
inches higher than the 33-foot height limitation. The applicant is requesting a variance to
retain the roof ridges at the existing, constructed heights. Thus, the applicant is
requesting a variance of 8.4 inches to the 33-loot height limitation.
II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of the Criteria and Findings for variances, contained in Section 18.62.060 of the Vail
lr4unicipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends denial of the requested
height variance based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
The requested variance will have little or no impact on adjacent properties
and structures. The portions of roof ridges that exceed 33 leet are very
short and the height exceedances are small' All ol the ridges are 8.4
inches over the 33{oot limitation for a length ol less than 5 lineal feet.
2.The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity ot treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the obiectives of this tltle without grant of special privilege
The applicant's statemenl indicates that the height exceedances ocourred
as a result of dimensional changes that were made in the floor structure
and roOf structure. These two structural changes increaSed the thickness
of the floors and the height of the roof structure' Compensating changes
could have been made to the interior floor to ceiling heights that would
have alleviated the height problem with negligible impact to the interior
spaces. The floor to ceiling heights were not adjusted accordingly'
Staff believes that approving the variance would be a grant of special
privilege that could oien tne door to similar, after-the-fact requests. Staft
believes it is important to stricfly enforce the 33joot height limitation in
order to maintain the integrity of the height regulation.
The efiect of the requested variance on light and air, distributiol'l of
population, transportation and traftic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public satety.
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical ditficulty 0r unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
3.
The requested variance will have no etfect on this criteria.
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings B.
before gfanting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classilied in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimential to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially iniurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Stalf recommends that the PEC deny the requested variance. Staff believes that granting the
height variance would not be materially injurious to other properties in the vicinity or to the public
freattfr, safety and welfare. However, stalf believes that lhe variance would be a grant of special
privilege since there does not appear to be any unusual circumstances unique to the property,. or
ihe construction process, that would justify the request. Staff believes that the strict and literal
interpretation of tne neignt limitation is neiessary to ensure that all residential construction in this
zone district is subject to the same height restriction.
lf the PEC denies the requested variance, staff recommends that the height problem be
remedied as follows:
1. The applicant shall submit a re-designed roof plan to the Design Review Board no
later than January 22nd. The roof plan shall propose a modified roof design that
meets the 33-foot height limitation and is architecturally harmonious with the
remainder of the structure.
2. An ILC shall be provided by the applicant, after the roof is re-framed, to confirm
the height of the re-designed roof is at or below the 33joot height limitation.
ffin ,'i ((
1",
j '.-{;') '_ _1, a
..,1
",;l'ri
'I I
i'f l *T.r
ll
t ,f
o 'e
o
U)
o
o
-9 lll.
lgez's-Ero-rlBs
t a.*s *!--'e'-
-
.--
Ei
-*r-
EE
at
-\t- -'t \l
I t-
T--*l-
.|_-
f--rl
T-
22
18 o
%q:w t 87c
.rrr R. O. tV.)
.)-
/s
lo*l@ o
z
2.0x8.0
F-ovERHANC
LOT
7-
rJ )o
\E \e
0.7' coNcRflE
RETAINING WAL|
LOT 23
0.5175 ACRES
t .J \
1
tnl
\
-)l 3l
t-)-o --t
rnl I t\I
-.t I o
-.>'F
-_l
5V.et
fBr2ss
i
'tor.s sron" 6;h6-MULTI-LEVEL --.=-+/ ,/
wooDFRAMFHoIJsF t'/ l WOOD FRAME HOUSE I - /
(uNDER coltrsrnu-c1-ror'r/ artz t
VEN CIRCLE
18149.0
frQ; ,*i'
HOVEY RESIDENCE VARIANCE
Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision
1339 Westhaven Circle
Vail , Colorado
The variance requested is a height variance as it relates to the thirty-three
foot (33t-On) maximum building height for structures in a duplex zone district.
The subject project is a single family residence at 1339 Westhaven Circl-e, GLen
Lyon Subdivision, SDD No. 4, Area C, Glen Lyon Duplex Lots.
The current Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) by Eagle Valley Surveying,
Inc., Job No.2242, dated 11-29-95, indicates minimal encroachnent in three
roof areas: (A1-so see attachments. ) |
A. 7ttto Ottfor a lineal distance of 4?-0ttat the third f1oor, norlh l"-'
bedroom north wal"l dorner. (8f47.1 per ILC vs. interpolated 8113.5
per original topographical survey by Intermountain Bngineering, Ltd. 'Projecr No. 948565, dared 11-4-94.)
B. 7tt to 0" for a LineaL distance of 3'-0" at the third floor hip ridge'
north bedroom. (8149.1 ILC vs. iterpolated 81f5.5.)
C. 13" to 0'r for a lineal distance of 5t-0t' at the third floor highest
roof ridge. (8150.6 ILC vs. interpolated 8116.5.)
Design Review Phase ridge line elevations were ttbest estimatert vertical dimen-
sions prior to structural engi.neering and construction phase detailing. The
ridge elevations were related to an enlarged, interpolated topographical survey
provided by Interurountain Engineering, Ltd. The third f1oor, north bedroom hip
roof was incorporated into the design to bring the roof into compliance at',DRB
stage.
The applicant acknowledges tlre ILC encroachment and has attenpted to determine
areas where the discrepancy occured. In addition to slight dirnensional variances
which may cornmonly occur during in-field construction, two areas of height in-
crease have been det.ermined:
1. Increase in depth of fl-oor framing members/plywood subfloor to support
radiant heating toppinB s1ab. (From 10" to 12 519".) This dimension
applied to two f l-oors iesul-ts in a total increase of 5 L/4".
2. Increase in roof Lruss top chord vertical height per truss manufacturerrs
shop drar.rings. This occurred during the construction phase and was
required to rnaintain typical fascia depth/detail.ing throughout the pro-
ject. '(From 6 lll6t'assumed 2x6 to 9 13/16".) This results in an in-
crease of 3 3/4t' .
lhe above two areas resul-t in a totaL increase of 9" to the height of the building.
Page 1 of 2
a
The project is located in a Debris Flow Hazard Zorre ar.d the owner requested
that appropriate mitigation measures be incorporated into the design. The
design t'tucks" the south facing, up-hill side of the residence and miEigation
wa11s into the site to create as Little site disturbance as possible and yet
maintain the mitigation standards of the consulting geologisE and the views
and natural light requests of the owner. Preserving the south portion of the
site and saving as nany trees as possible were requirements of the DRB aL
approval" stages.
Had potential- minor dimensional increases been deemed to Pose a problem' the
lower 1eve1 slab el-evation coul-d have been lowered a foot or so' thus lowering
the total height of the structure as it relates to original natural grade.
However, this most. likely wouLd have resulted in higher exposed mitigation
wa1ls on the south side of the structure and/or increased regrading on lhe uP-
hill side with resultant loss of trees.
It is the applicantrs wish to request. a height variance in order to maintain
the existing, DRB approved design integrity and deLailing of the residence.
We feel that maintaining the current aesthetics of the building out-weigh the
minor encroachments. The encroachments were in no way intentional , nor do they
benefit the owner or det.ract from neighboring properties.
APPLICATION ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED:
l. The subject project is a single family residence located in an area
of l-arge duplex residences. The structure already Presents less of'
a visual impact t.han adjacent properties and the requested variance
r.rould not have detrimental affects on any existing or potential uses
and structures. (See attached photos. )
2. The granting of the variance would not constitute special priviledge,
since similar residentlal issues and encroachments have previously
been granted variances in order to maintain the best interests of a
particular project and adjacent areas.
3. and 4. The granting of the variance will have no affect on light and
air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facil-
ities' utilities' public safety and Vail's Gomprehensive Pl-an.
Page 2 of 2
HOVEY RESIDENCE VARIANCE
LoE 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision
1339 Westhaven Circle
Vail, Col-orado
The variance requested is a height variance as it relates to the thirty-three
foot (33r-Qtt) naximum building height for structures in a duplex zone district.
The subject project is a single family residence at 1339 Westhaven Circle, Glen
Lyon Subdivision, SDD No. 4, Area C, Glen Lyon Duplex Lots.
The current Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) by Eagle Valley Surveying'
fnc., Job No.2242, dated 11-29-95, indicates minimal encroachment in three
roof areas: (A1so see attachments. ) ir
A. V" 0'r for a lineal distance of 4'-0" at the third floorr rlorth lr':,
-bedroon north waLl dormer. G!nr)--pst ILC vs. interpolaEed -qU]{per original topographical sur-vey by Intermountain EngineerinS' Ltd.'
froject No. 948565, dared 11-4-94.)
"/'->B. (7")to 0" for a lineal distance of 3t-0" at the third floor hip ridge,-i6rttr bedroom. (e139-.!_!-!C vs. iterpolated Allsj:.)
v7'-'' 1 C. \I3'lto 0" for a lineal distance of 5r-0'r at the third floor highest tr'oof ridge. (8J!.!!LC vs. interpolated 8Il6J.)
Design Review Phase ridge line elevations were ttbest estimaterr vertical dimen-
sions prior to structural engineering and construction phase detailing. The
ridge elevations were related to an enLarged, interpolated topographical survey
provided by IntermounEain Engineering, Ltd. The third f1oor, north bedroom hip
roof was incorporated into the design to bring the roof into compliance at':DRB
stage .
The applicant acknowledges tlre ILC encroachment and has attempted to determine
areas where the discrepancy occured. In addition to slight dj.mensj.onal variances
rlhich may conrnonly occur during in-field construction, two areas of height in-
crease have been deternined:
^ ,.,*r{slt*t''l
S;j;.of,t-
({o', " ,,4 Increase in roof tr-uss toF c.X9Iq_ygl!i9g1_!eight per truss nanufacturerrs
shop drawings. This occurred during the construction phase and was
5? required to maintain typical fascia depth/detailing throughout the pro-
ject. (From 6 1/16" assumed 2x6 to 9 13/16".) This results in an in-
redfunE-+eati$8-tolPing sl ab.
applied to two floors results in a total increase of 5 I/4".
crease of 3 3/4tl
nins members/plvwood subfloor to support
(Fron 10" to L2 5/8". ) This dinension
The above two areas resul! in a total increase .Qy). the heieht :, t):otrro1F
rr r. \/ I nk '7 /l!,--^ !v'Y u'" - t
,
t/h** o'u atyr ww qI : l*^ ^"/')t'*^q '//nu f* q
Y
flr*Wrrir' * ,o( .chP not'fu'?'
Page r or 2
The project is located in a Debris Flow Hazard Zone and the owner requested
that appropriate mitigation measures be j.ncorporated into the design. The
' design "tucks" the south facing, up-hi11 side of t.he residence and mitigation
wal1s into the site to create as 1itt1e site disturbance as possible and yet
maintain the mitigation standards.of the consulting geologist and the views
and natural light requests of the owner. Preserving the south portion of the
site and savi.ng as many trees as possible vere requirements of the DRB at
approval staSes.
Had potential minor dimensional increases been deemed to pose a probi-em, the
lower leve1 slab elevation could have been lowered a foot or so' thus lowering
the total height of the structure as it relqtes to original- natural grade.
However, this most likely would have resulted in higher exposed mitigation
APPLICATION ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED:
1. The subject project is a single family residence located in an area
of large duplex residences. The structure already presents less of
a visual impact than adjacent properties and the requested variance
would not have detrinental affects on any existing or potential uses
and structures. (See attached photos.)
2. The granting of the variance would not constitute special priviledge,
d encroachments havegevlsg- lY
4 \
--7
bgen g."'If Fd variallles in order to maintain the best interests of a
particular project and adjacent areas.
3. and 4. The granting of the variance will have no affect on light and
air, distribution of population' transPortation' traffic facil-
ities, utilities, public safety and Vail's Comprehensive P1an.
1 wa1ls on the south side of the structure and/ or increased regrading on the uP-
\\\{\O hill side },ith resul-tant loss of trees.
.'"\t''/--r, is the appl-icantts wish to request a height variance in order to mainEain
f_\t\ ^ | the existing, DRB approved design integrity and detailing of the residence.-r.Qz ,.1 We feel that maintaining the current aesthetics of the building out-weigh Ehe
--. U\;1t / minor encroachments. The encroachments vrere in no way intentional , nor do they
V) t$ \benefit the owner or detracL from neighboring properties.
Page 2 of 2
01.0 REpugLlc ilAll0NAL TlTLt tNSURANCt C0MPANY, i Minnos0b c0rp06ti00, ierein ralled lhs company. for s
valutble consideouon. hsraby cornmits t0 is$ug its potrcY 0r policiss 0l tr e ins{tancs. ls idlrrtilhd in Scheduls A ii law
of the propoeod Insund namsd in Schsdule A as owrnt 0l nongagee 0t d0 ostalo ot intrnst covsnd hecby in tha lrnd
dercribed or refrnrd to in Srheduh A, up6n psymsnl of thr premiums ond charlss lherelor, all subi0ct lo dle provisi0nt Dl
Scheduls A and I snd l0 th€ Conditlons snd Stipuhtrons hureof,
lhis Commitmsn( fia[ be elfsctivg only when the idenity 0t ths proposed InSUted anC th8 omount 0f tho Politt 0r
00lici0s c0mmittod lor hav0 b€sn i0rsnod h gchsduls A hereol by rho Compery. silhet at tIs dms ol fio issuancr ol this
Commitment ot by subssquent endorEgminlr
Ihi! Commment rs prGiiminary 10 the issuanco 61 su6h policy or polcies ol tttio infurrnco and tll liability {nd 0!ii!0ti0il3
hersunder shall cerse and lelmina(e six monthr tftet the affsctivs da(r hereol rtr vihen thg policy or policies conimiued lor
shsll i!su0. whicltevsr lirt occurs, ptovidd fiat lho lailrllg t0 issue such poltY 0r oolioai is not lhc lsult of tho company'
c0N0rltoils Al{D sItPUr.AIr0lls
l. Ths tsrm "mongrge", whgn u$rd herern, sholl ioclude dged ol tftst, Itust deed, 0t 0th6r !€curilt Instruhe|ll,
2. lf tho proposed lnsurod hos 0r Dcqilires dcrual knovriedge ol rny defect, lien. snctJnibfancS, advsne cl0int 0t othgt
maitg llfeclng thc rstste or interast ot mongage th0r00n covlrgd bY lhis Commitmonr 0th0r rhrn tho$s shown in Schsdulo I henof, lnd shall ftl to disclose such lnowledge
to the Compony in wiring, rho Company sha! bg relieved from la[ilhy lor ony loss or damage resuitrng from eny oct 0f rolianco hsrson l0 thr etutlt tho hmpeny is pmjudicod
by lailun of rhs proposcd Inrured to lo discloss such tnowledge. lf thr proporrd Insurld 6hall discloss such knov'4edge to the Company, or if lhe Compd0y oih0r,viss rcqudes
octua|lnow|ed!sof0nysUchd0lect.|i8n,9ncumbrancc,adversechim0tolherrnotter,|hEc0mpdy
guch 6flgndf'snt thall n0( rsligve lhe Comgany from liability previoudy incuned pu$udnt t0 psdqdph 3 of lhesq Conditrons 6nd Stipulai0ns.
3. Lhbilio of the Company tl0dff lhis Commitmgnr sha! bo only t0 tho nimsd frroposei Insured 6nd such pa(iss
includcdundgthcde|hitonof|nsuredindre{ormo|po|icyorpo|icirIcommittgdfolandpn|yforrctrra||osrincuredinreliancgheteoninund3rukin0in0oodhith|llto
comp|ywirhfer0q!inmsntshueo|orlb|tol|iminateucepdonsshowrlin5chedU1gB,or{dro6cqUirs0lct0st0thggslglsotin1steBt0|m0lt0a00
c0nmitmsnl.|nnosventsha||such|ilbi|it1exc0ed(hgrm00ntstal0dinsch8du|sAlorttrepolicvolpo|itiescomnhter'||0landsuch|i'bilityi$sUbl0ct
Dtovision: rnd the condhi0ns and Sti0uhtions rnd tlc hchsionr hom Covlrage of the form of poticy or policis{ conmittgd lu in favor 0l tio pr000ssd Insured which etg
heeby iflcorporar0d by refennce and made o pan ol this ComnitmBnt €rcBpt ss 0rp(0ssly modiliod hsr8in.
4. Any rcrion or aclions or rights ol oction rhor rhe ptop0sgd In3urod may have ot may bnnf a0Slnsl thr Company
arising our 0f th6 status 0l thg tttlg l0 rhs sstate or interesr or the stalus 0l tho moilg000 $€r60i covergd by thh Commirment nrust D0 bs$sd on lnd ae subject to the
provrsonr of this Commilm&nl.
SIAJIOARI) EXCEPTIOI{S
ln 6dd;ti0n t0 lho malrsrs c0noi00d in thg C00di!0ns rnd Stipulotionl onrl [rclusions fiom Cowrage ab0v0
nferred to. tris Comfi'ilmsnt is rho subiect b lha following,
l. Rights or chims ol paliel in possession not 3h0wn by the publjc ncords
?, Eassmsn$. or claims of oasomgnts. not shown by the publrc recotds.
3. Oiscngancies, conflicts In boundary lines, :honage in aroa. oncfoachmsnls. and eny lacts which a cottoct
suwet rnd inspoction of rhr pramises would disclose end tthich ars tlot $hown by lho public tecorrJs.
4. Any lien. or righ{ to a lien, for $rvices. hbcr or mouriol thgrerclote or htrraftsr funished, ifilposgd iy law
ond nol th0wn bv thc public tecords'
6. gefgcts. lienr, eocumbftncos. adverse claims 0r gther narurs. if any, srsated. frrst oppeanng in rhs pubh rtcudr
ofaltscliingsubsequentl0ths0lf0c(ivBdatehereofbutpriortothedatetheploposedinsursdscqui46o|rscotdforva|us
Commitmgnt.
lN wllNtss wHEFI0F. old Bspllblrc National lills Insurance Comprny hss cru$gd il$ corpotEtt n0m6 and stal t0
br h0reunro illir8d by i6 duly ruthonted olficers on rhe daro lhown in Sctreduls A, to bs valid wfien counlerigned by 6 vslidating ollicer or olher outhofiied sionat0ry'
0m nEPUBuc xATl0llAl. TlTtt lllsunAttcc coilPAtlY
A Stoc* Conponl
400 Saclnd Anna. iouth, Mnnearolis, l'liaatsott 55101
(61?t l/,.tlt,
+* *r
i-Rj
76,rn,- frelrl*n-FI Ptcttdutl
Autlorittd Sitnttorf
0Al Jolotie2
A|xit S.lf,tetttf
P- B3
' RepreEentlng otd Sepublic Natlonal Tltle rnsurance company
THA}IK YOU 8OR tOtN ORDER
June 29, 1994
Q{rr order No.l v24385
T I
.rbuvpn/ownnn:' NAIICY M. HOVEY
SELIJER:
BETTY M. IHOT.IAS
ADDRESS:
FOR TITLE QUESTIONS CAI,I, KAREII HORTH 303 476'225L
FOR CLOSING 9UESTTONS CAIJL' ARZN{A RUCKER 303 476-225L
CIJoSER
coples: 1 Ittnr ARZNIA RUCKER Reference:
srJrFER' Sl,tITH AIID TRAMPTON
DRAI{ER 2820
BEAVER CREEK, CO 81620
copies!t-__--.-^^.. 8aE-9400 Attn: iIAN ifoHNSoN Referance:
SLIFER, SMITH AIID FRN'TPTON
230 BRIDGE ST.
VAII.,, CO 81657
Copies: 1.,__-_ _^_._ 476-zAzL attn: GEORGE LAI'iB Reference: ='-
(
AI,TA COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE A
Our erder No. r VZ43B5
For Infornatlon only
- Chargee -AIJTA Owner Follcy 91,036.00 Tax Report- - -..1'" $20'oo '-ToTAL-- Sr,oii.oo
****I.TITH YOUR REI{TTTANCE PLEASE REFER TO OUR ORDER NO. V24385****
1. Effective Dato: June x4, 1994 at 8:00 A.M.
2. policy to be issued, and proposed fnsured!
, TALTAI Owner,s policy l0_17-9A g365,000.00
proposed fnEured:
NANCY M. HOVEY
3. The estate or--interest in th-e land descrlbed or ref€rred to in thls Conmltrnent anO covirei..trereln lsr
A Fee Sinpte
4' Title to the^e'tate or interegt covered herein is at the effectlve date hereor vesili fn:
BETTY M. THOMAS
s. Hir*l? referred ro in this connitnent is deEcrlbed ag
LOT 23, GI.EN_L'ON_SUBDIVISfON, ACCORDfNG TO THE AI,TENDED RECoRDED phT__IllElEor,-nic6ibno_ctnv re, leTB rN BooK 272 AT eAGE 3zo, corrNry or sAci;r, -iiarn oF coLoRADo.
PACE 1
.-____--.-..'!_ ,i_ r e_gs rue 1?:1?EUG PARTHERS
LTA COMHIT
SCHEDUITE B-1
(Requirenente)
ME}IT
Our Order # V243Ag
=se 5l€. ?464 P. B5
A
The following are the requirernents
1. Palrnent to or for the account
tha full conel-deration for the
' lnsured.
to be comPlied with:
of the grantors or mortgagorB
eeiata-or lnterest to be
of
2,Proper lnstrunentls; creating-tho estata or intereet to be
insured nust be executed and duly filed for record, to-wlt:
EvTDENcE sATTsFACTORY To THE CoMPAIIY THAT THE TERI'!S' cgNqITI-g$ NfD
pRoVISIoNs oF THE Tot{N oa VAIL [dl}iSfni rU ltAvE BEEN SATISFIED'
I{ARRANTI DEED FROM BETTY I't. THOI.IAS TO NANCY H. HOvEy CoNVEYING suBJEc|r
PROPERTY..
THE COUNTY CIJERI( AND RECORDERS OFFICE REQUIRES RETURN
ADDRES8ES ON DOCUMENTS SENT FOR RECORDINGI I
3.
4.
AIJTA OMMITI{ENT
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exaeptlons) our Order # v24385
The policy or pollcies to be lssued will contaln exceptlons to the
tol,l-owing-unleis the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of
the Conpany:
1. Standard Exceptions L through 5 prlnted on the cover sheet.
6. TaxeE and assesslnents not yet due or payable and special
asEassmente not yet certlfl.ed to tha treasurar's offlce.
7, Any unpaid taxes or asseEauenta against slid land'
8. Llens for unpaid water and sewer chargea, if any.
10.
RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE TII9 ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD EHE SN.IE BE FOT'ND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECA AHE PREI'IISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENI RECORDED August 16, 1909' IN BOOK it8 At
PAGE 54?.
RIGHT OT WAY FOR DITCHES OR CAIIAIJS CONSTRUCTED BY TITE AUTITORITY OF THE
UNITED SIATES AS RESERVED rN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDBD August 16' 1909,
IN BOOK 4S AT PAGE 542.
o
c
9.
11. RESERVATION AS TO THE NORTIiWEST 1,14 OF SECTION 12 TOI.INSHIP 5 SOtIlH, RAI{GE
sl WEST oF THE RIGHT oP WAY Of THb ITNITED sTATEs, Irs PERMITTES oR
LfCENSEE, TO ENTER UPON, OCCUPY A}{D USE ANY PART OR AIJL oF SAID LAI{D POR
THE PI'RPOSES PROVIDED IN THE ACT OF JI'NE 10, 1920 (41 SAT. 1063) AS
RESERVED IN THE pATENf RECORDED OqIOBER 2, 1946 rN BOoK 132 Alr PAGE 405.
12. RESIRICTM COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A TORFETTIRE OR REVERIIER
CIAUSE, BUT OMITIING RESIRIOIIONS, IF AllY, BASED ON RACE, coLOR, RELIGION,
oR NATIONAL ORIGXN, AS CONTAINED iN INSTRinIENT RECORDED Aprll 04, 1978' IN
BooK 268 AI PAGE 598 AND AS AI|ENDED IN INSTRIIMENT RECORDED AuguBt 25' 1987,
rN BOOK 463 AT PAGE 44? THROUGH 472 AND A9 RERECORDED IN INSTRUI'IENT
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 IN BOOK 469 AT PAGE 8Ol, AIID AS AI.IENDED IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED I'IAY 2, 1990 IN BOOK 528 AT PAGE 154.
13. EASE!{ENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS A8 SHOI{N OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED AIIENDED PI,AT OF GLEN LYON SUBDIVISION.
14. FIFTEEN FOOT UTILITY A}TD DRAINAGE EASEI.IENT AIONG TTTE WEST I.loT T,INE OT
suBJEcT PROPERTY AS sHowll oN THE AIiIENDED PLAT oF GtEN LYON SUBDfVISION.
:l
PAGE
r. l4 r ---'-l
I
.v-ilr ll l,gND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY I{
).lt
DISCLOST'RE STATEUENB
Requlred by genate BiIl 91-14
A) The subJect real property nay bA located in a epeclal taxtng diatrict.
B) A certiflcate of raxeE Due rlsting each taxing juriedlctlon nay be obtained from the County rieaEurer or €ne County Treasurerrs authorized agent.
c) The lnfornation regardlnq special distrlote and the boundaries of such dlstrlcts ruay be-ob-talned frorn the Board of county coruniesioners, the county clerk end Reaorder, or the couniy Aageggor.
Reguired by Sehate Bitl 92-143
A) A certificate of raxe6 Due tlsting each taxlng Juriedlctlon eharr be obtained fron the county Treasurer oi ihe county Treasurerrs authorized agent,
7
t w(ffi
tlrltr,( (rr^ =l-
6/ tlF,f (t,,t) \ ,,'!- )
v ll? ?G,,r) ,o1"I
ii
!./
o
{TLE'
==-
7/(t,/
n n,(
&l p'(
#y33
7-1-*-r;-[.^#9
s1 l7 ,{
17 tnf
Y / r {{
i(1,L
It a.L'
. i([],>
D"l,\t
I
f,
Gt,l
0t, ()
(3(
ry
/l'
4
C
H
_^-
w ' updrtod 4ll1l95 lpntuot"ooo@
r.nuar/ 8, 1996 PECMBBIINODAfu
APPLICATIOTV rOR A vlBrAIYc[
[ $su:8str"sFrlBMAnoN
th! proccduro ir rcquircd for ;ay gpJ6t nquldiry I vrddea Tho rplicdm will not bc acccg,bd rurtrl dl thc
hfotutrtion ir cubfflusd.
A. BR.BIFDBspRllvuoNotpRopor^t. Bulldl'ngtelght varl,Ts-s. f9{ J.o-of-r-rd-qg-:ucroahh'
nonta ltr thfee areasl f.) Tlrdeereaslng to Otlfor 4lloeal feet3 2.) 7rl de-
creasing to 0" for 3 ltneal feetl 3.) l3rr rlecreaslng to 0rr for 5 lineal feet.
E, l{AMEoFATTLI{ANT(tpeorprtntrjFCK iND,ts-QffirASr INc. -,..--
ADDRE6g__ P.0. Box 4030 9i0-949-1800
crTy, sTArE. zrp igllr_ Cgl.lrado 81658
BllL Anrterson (BEC( AND ASSOCIATES, INC.)
D.
ADDRxss P.0, Box 4030 ppoNB_9J-0-949-1E00
ClTY,sTATBflp V411, Colorado 81658
NAIA OF OWNER(S) ([po or prin 0 - !tr.,39.!hs. Clq4es {o_tey
owNER(S) SIANA
0 htoodholn
clTY, srATq ap }lgnchester Meesechueetts 01944
TOCATION OF PROPOSAI-:Glen Lyon Subdivlsloa (Vatl, Colorado
23 N/l SDD No, 4, Area C, Gleu Lgon Duplex Lotc.
ETREETADD
CITY,STAIEZIP Vall. -Qolorado8l6lT .. _.
,f*
o"
fforo,o,o #AB* r-nn"''!'lt{^,r, t+u** A
Ttc fca nw! bo paid bcforo tho Conunrurtty Dcvr,lopnpnt Dopshrcor will mtpt yonr propoul,
UI. ADJACENT PROIPRTY NOfi FICATIOIY
Sti "rpcrd'rddrcrsodmvolopesof6onqncaofouhato-fllllnnotryEljrcorrrbthcorbJociprotrtty
INCLUDING PROPERTTBP.HINDANDId[iisisrfuhTs,ind;itr;in,Lornarltrdmlilingadrlresru.
TI{B APPTICAI.IT WILL BE RE$PONSIBLF rb_R MRRECT I4AILWO IrrPN*SXS.
IY. .HKS-AffLICAIION OONFERENCR
Apru'rpplicrdon canfcrcnrcc with rphndngrrafimirnbcf k ilildytlcoilftildcd b dotcnnhc tf qyrddtlmrl Informedon h noo&a No 1nglig.dil;In ilHlffrnhrs itr complotc (nnrrr inctudc all itornr mquhorr bv rho zoning admlnidretoo. ii i rh;eprldiiilffit;uuioii, "ail.-ri?iffiir rvnh tre sranto furd our about addltiorrat rutrnlurl rcqGffi;, -- -'*'*
V. SURMrrur. nrroruwarrou
PLEASENoTBTIIATAS!Ery.,[EAPPLtrcATIoNlvlttsTRBAITdLINETHBAPPRoVALpRoctssg
FoR YouR PRomr niEffil-snio ffi riiifonn otr coNDrnoNs op AppRovA[ Ttr r rnn
THUr.N.g+ly.D_Il_MROXlr,f Elrrrr,comassl6r.lpEqMArsrrpulA,rEALLcoNDrrloNsoF
AD.IACENT PROPERTY OINERS
-
[ovey Kesloence varlance
I,at 23, Glen Lyon Subdiv.
1339 l{esthaven Circle Vail, Colorado
LOT 14 (1350 Greenhill Court):
,/.- t\d.
7.rLf^f'ne/*o{v\t'Ar
tOT l8 (1359 Greenhill
LOT 22 (1380 Westhaven Circle):
I,OT 24 (1319 Westhaven Circle):
Ed and Gloria Hicks
3026 South Padre Island Drive (brpus ChrisEi, Texas 78415
TINIT A
Ilitchell and Mary Wol-f Karlin
375 Chestnut
l{innetka, Illinois 60093
l!
T'NIT B Fnelf J. KarLin and Mary Wolf Karlin
375 Chestnut
l{i.nnetka, Illinois 60093
LOT 15 (1330 Greenhill Court):
LOT t6 (1320 Greenhill Court):I.E{IT A
Jeffery M. and Sal1y
699 Soda Creek Drive
Helms Horn
80439 Ilvergreen Colorado
TDIIT B
lllLen and Janet Gerstenberger
1320 Greenhill Court Vail, Colorado 81657
H.chard W. and Julie L. Meister
4Ol5 Hanover Street
trb1las, Texas 75225
TFIT A
Steven A. and Corinne Saldanha
7A)2 Ayrshire Lane
Boca Raton, Florida 33496-L4LB
IffiIT B Philip A. and Marjorie OtDeen
lbonas D. and Sarah Gleason
2209 Crest Lane
l{clean, Virginia 22101
llJL Development
P-O. Box 3451
Vail.l , Col-orado 81658
Torr of Vail, Colorado TRACT B:
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUF PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Gommission of the Town ol
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on January 8, 1996, at 2;00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Buibing. In
consideration of:
A request for a Minor SDD Amendment to allow for changes to the development plan
located at Millrace Phase 3, 1335 Westhaven Drive/Development Area A of the Glen Lyon SDD
(SDD No. a).
Applicant: Steve Riden representing Gregory Walton
Planner: Jim Curnutte
A request for a Major SDD Amendment to allow for a 485 square foot addition to an existing
condominium in the Gateway Building located at 12 Vail Road, Unit SA/ail Gateway Plaza
Building.
Applicant: Steve Riden representing Vail Apartments Inc.
Planner: Bandy Stouder
| { request for a building height variance to allow for a residence currently under construction to exceed
{fre n'eignt timit located-at 1539 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision (SDD #4).
fApplicant: Bill Anderson representing Mr. and Mrs. Charles Hovey - Planner: Lauren Waterton
A request for a wall height variance and driveway grade variance for the Koenig residence located at
795 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 26, Vail Polato Patch Subdivision.
Applicant: Eric Johnson for Gary Koenig Planner: George Ruther
A change to the TOV survey policy to require an lmprovement Location Certificate (lLC) prior to a
foundatlon inspection when a project is within three leet of a setback line, has a building height within
six inches of the maximum allowable, has a driveway that is greater than |0% or for all projects
including three or more separate structures.Planner: Lauren Waterton
--Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114
voice or 479-2356 TDD for information..-
community Development Department
Published December 20, 1995 in the Vail Trail.
F leveryonetsec\nolices\o 1 0895.wpd
'oufu,,rhulu6
vr'[e'Y
.o oo
TOWN OF VAIL
PAYAALE TO TOWN OF V
{ i,)V"
TrrufFf *;_-;;;;- *.-*--
l,liscel Ianeous Cssh
1t_Er8_t5
1:,.1:_.
R*c*ipt * lgi,SlE
::,:lu"r {+ L-:ti # rlFS E€_cl,.i glitr g5:ir:tr::. ..t,cgtgt.tcE
Hrrl'f un I tenderp,J :: r-Sff. Er:l
I rem FEid flmoun t paid
ff I EElFfi4 t 3gEtErfi,:t ?Ifi, Sr-''
f,hange rF t u rnF,J jr
!:1. L1[1
THFh|I< 1/CIIJ
'rr'lU r cash i er Srlt.tJH
^l" t I J tr;'
. . il - r.l
+**r
i-Rj
0t0 BEpuBUc NATlot{At TtTtt ll{suRAtlct C0MPANY, o Minnesota cor[oo on, i6lsrn s6lled lh6 company. Iu s
vrlu6bl0 c0nsid0ration, horeby cor0mits to ksus iu p0ncy 0f polhis$ 0l lrrle Insuanc0. lc idsntfhd in scheduh A ii lavof
of rhg lrgpo$pd Inrursd namsd in $thsduh A, os ownsl 0r rrrortgageo 0f U0 0$tal0 tr intertst covend herrhy in $s lind
describsd or rEfened fo in Schsduls A" up6n pgy1nrnl ol thg premiums snd chltges lherefor; sll subisct t0 dle pndsionr rl
$cheduls A end I onr, t0 tho Conditions snd Stigulations hereof,
lhis Commilmen( shall be ellsctjre tnly wfien ths identity of the Proposed InsUred aflC the smount dt tho politt 0r
ooliciss commilted tol hivo b00n iosenod h Scheduh A hereof by ths [ompeny. sither at $l imo ol ths ilsuancr ol this
Commilmont or by subllquent gndor$gmgnl.c
lhh Commttnlefil iS prtliminary o thg issuongs 0f $UCh PglhY or polcier o.| tth insurrnco ond all liablity and otligotionS
henunder shrll cer$ and letminats lix months oft* ilre slfsctive dalo he€ol 0r vlhsn ths policy or polhits committld lor
shall hsue, vrhiche,rtr lirt occurs, providd th tho lailute t0 issue such policY 0r ooliciss rs not thr fouh of lhs Company.
c0N0tTl0ils AND SIPUt ATt0NS
L The rerm "mo(gsgs", whsn ulsd herein, shall include deed of trust, ttust dEed, or othfl r€curll msrumml'
2. ll thr proposed Inrured has or acquins actuol knowlodge ol any dllecl lisn, encunrbtan$. advgne clrim ot othet
mattd tllgctlng thr sststs or inlerrsr 0r mortl6g0 th0r00n cwgrsd bV lhir Commitrnenr other rhan those shown in Schedule B hsnof, and shell lal to di$lo6g $uch lnowledge
totheComponiinwi{nq,thoc0mponYsha[bsrr|igved|mmIabilirytorlny|ossotdama0onsulting|romanyectofr8liancehsreooloth!extentt!lgc0m9anyisprejllcld
by lalwe of fr proposed lnrured to l0 discloss $uch Ingwledge. ll (hs proposrd In$wgd ehall dilcloss such lnowledge to tho Compeny, or il the Corpdnl 0ih0M$0 scq0[es
ocruol lnowledge 0f any such delect lien. gnlumbtrnu, advtrse clgim 0t olher mrtter, tha Comptrty 6t its option may amsnd schedule B 0l this c0mmitmrnt lrcotdi 0lv' but
such tmsndrnont ehall nol nlievr the Comgany from lirbilhy previously incuned pucutnl l0 Dimgmph 3 of thess Conditions ond Stjptihlons,
3, Liability of thr Compony l|nd tis Commitnsnt shai bo only 10 rh0 namsd propoud Inswed e|ld such Panies
mcluded undx rhr defini on of Insured in $e lorm ol policy or polici$ committed for and only for rctual loss incuned in roliance hsreon in underukinE m pod hith lal to
cnmply wirh fe tsqiromsnb hErof or lbl 6 rliminrb ercepdons shown rn $hgduls B, or {cl ro rcquire 0r crsats ths B$tsl, or inlErt$t 0r m0(gag0 thercon covemd by this
!0f,l''1m0nL|nnlrventshr||such|iabi|ityerc0ed$e|m0untstatodinSchgdu|gAtorthr'o|icyorpo|iciescomnirted[orandsuchlifb;|ityisJF0t
provirjonr rnd $e Condhions tnd Sriprllationi rnd thr frclurionr from Covemge of the form ol policy ot policist committld lor in lavor 0l $0 pr0D0$0d Insured which aru
heioby incor0oausd ty telgnncs and made o pan ol this Comnilmolt orc€pl ss sxplossly modilied he'tin.
4. Any lction 0r lctions 0r rights of acrion thar the proposrd Insurod rnay hsvs 0r msY bnrtg alainsl thg ComplnY
lrising our of tho sralus 0l thl tidg to rhr esrats or intenm or rho srarus 0l tho mongolo $0r00n coversd by thh Comniment must bs l)0sd on rnd ro subiect to tho
0rov$ons of t[ir Cffrmilmrnt.
SIAflI}ASD tX[tPllol{S
In oddidon m lho maltols c0n$inod in tho C0ndiloni and Stipulationr s0tt [rclusi0ff hom Cownge lb0v0
nf€lod 10, thk Commilrnsnt ir lho sublect t0 lhe follosring,
l. ffights ot chims ol panier in possession not shown bY the public ncods.
2. Ea$onont$. or claims of ossornonts. no1 showo hY lhe pubfiD recolds,
3' 0i*rtpancitl, conflilts in boundlry linrs' lhonagt in area' gncrcachmgnts' tnd orty lrcu vvhich s c0rrgct
sumt ind inst€c(ion ol the premiees rculd dbclose and which ato,lot shor"l by tho public ocordr.
4. Any lien, or right to a sn' for ggrvicss, labot or materiol tisretofus or herutfta funrshed, imposod by law
ond nor rhown by lhe public relords.
5. 0efcct!, liEns, encumbrancss, rdvelrc claiml 0r other m{ugr$. if any, creatsd, ftrsl 0ppe0 n0 in te publlt rucordt
oratrachingsubsequontrfge|fsc(ivrdatehsnofbutpriortolhsdauthsprop0s0din$ul0dscqUinlotllcordlorvo|uotheest00i|ntD|0$I
Commitnent.
ll,l WlTl'ltSS WH[B[0F. otd BopuD],c NrtioDat ti{s Insurance Company hss cru$ed it6 corporatE 0rfl0 ond sral (0
be h0r0u0to alfirsd by ifr duly rulhori:ed olficers on rhe dau lhown in Scfudule A, to bs valid when countersigned by 0 vslidaling olficer or other audorited signetoU.
0ro REFuBuc ilATroflAl' TITIE lllsllRAI{GC Gol/lPAtt
A Stocl Conpony
{00 Ssconl Avnnae Soulh, liinasnpolis, Miamson 55101
16l?l3lt.,ltt
76pn* frdrl*n-8l hatth
hthothet Sbmwl
OXl torl2El2
$cnay
l la-es ruE lt"tJOuG PARrtlERS =51" =.'.
,/', TJAND TITIJE GUARANTEE COMPANY
RepreBentlng otd Republic Natlonal Tltle rn6urance conpany
TTIAIIK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER
P. B3
June 29, 1994
g{rr order No. r v24385
I
.,rbuYnnTonnsunt l{Al{cy M. HovEY
SEL,LER:
BETTY I{. THOMAS
ADDRESS:
FOR TITLE QUasTIoNs CAIJIJ KAREN HORTH 303 476'225L
FOR CIJO$ING QUESTIONS CAIJIJ ARZAT{A RUCKER 303 476-?251
CI,oSER
CoPleE: 1
Atlnl ARZN{A RUCKER Reference:
SLIFBR, SMIfll AIID FRAI'IPTON
DRAWER 2820
BEAVER CREEK, CO 81520
copies:l-__-.^-^^-- a4S-9{00 Attn: JAN JOHNSON Reference:
SLIFER, SUITH AIID FRNIPTON
230 ERIDGE ST.
VAII,, CO 81657
coples: 1.__-_ - ^ -_ 476-z4zL Attn: 98ORGE LAI'IB Reference
-'------"'-- ./-. -- "" !'JE r""j;5BUG PARTHERS -*J* '***P. S4
I
,/'
AI/fA COltl,{ITUENT
SCHEDULE A
Our Qrder No. ! VA43B5
For fnformatlon only
- Chargae -ALTA owner Follcy 911036.00 Tax Report _TOTAL-_ $20.00
$1, 055.00
****},ITH YOUR REI'IITTANCE PLEASE REFER TO OIIR ORDER NO. V24385*r**
1. Effective Date: June 14, 1.99{ at BIOO A.M,2, policy to be lssued, and proposed fnsufed:' rrALTA, Owner's policy lo_1?_9e 93651000.00
propoeed Insured:
NANCY U. HOVEY
3. The estate or- lnteregt in the lar.rd deEcrlbed or referred to in thle Conmltraent anO """i"ei'.irereln lsl
A Fee $irnple
4' Title to the.estate or interest oovered herein ie at the effectlve date hereoi-vesili=.n,
BETTY M. THOMAS
5' The
'and referrecl to in this cornnitnent re descrrbed as folLowsr
IJO' 23, GLEN.T'O_N_SUBDfVfSfON, ACCORDING TO THE AI,TENDED RECoRDED Pnl.Il1E$oFl-iic6iouo_,rur," r'r, rezs rN BooK 2zz Ar eAGE 320, corrrry or i:eci,i, -iliern oF coLoRADo.
PACE 1
----*'v ,,4'-ta-e= ruE rr=t= eJCG eARTHERS 1Ee 526 7464 P. E5 oo
ALTA COITMITI'{ENT
/ gctlEDurJB B-1
lnequlreraente) Qur order # v243s5
The following ate the requirenents to be complied with:
1. paynent to or for the account of the sran!o51- or mortgagore of
the fuII consl-deration for the eetate-or interest to be
' lnsured.
z, Proper lnstru$ent(s) creating the estate or intereat to be
lneured nust be executed ana auii tiiea for f,ecord' to-wlt:
3. EVIDENCE SATISTACTORY TO THE COMPAI{Y fITAT THE TERI'IS' CONDITIONS AIID
pRoVISIoNs oF THE TowN oF vAIi -TBiTiSrfn rlX HAVE BEEN SA'IISFIED'
4, WARRANTY DEED FROM BETTY I'T. THOMAS TO NATTCY M' HOVEY CONVEYING SUBJE T
PROFERTY..
rHE COUNIY CITERI( AND RECORDERS OFFXCE BEQUIRES RETIIRN
ADDRESSES ON DOCUMENTS SENT FOR RECORDINGI I
oo oo
AIJTA COMMIT
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exaeptlons)
T{HNT
Our Order # V24385
The policy or pollaLee to be leEued will contaln exceplf"l? to the
tollowing-unleis the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of
the Company:
1. Standard ExceptionE I through 5 prlnted on the cover sheet'
6. Taxes and aegegsments not yet due or payable and special
agsassnente not yat certlfled to the Treasurarts oftlce'
7, any unpaid taxes or assesslnents agalnst slio tand'
8. LLene for unpaid water and sefler chargesl if any.
9. RICHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR IdDE TO EXTRACT AND REITOVE HIS ORE
trHEREFRoM sHourJD THE sAME BE ronNt To pnunrnarE oR rNrERsEcr rHE PREI'lrsEs
As RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATEI.IT RECORDED AUgUSt 16, 1909' IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 54E.
10. RIGHE OF I{AY FOR DITCHES OR CAITATS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
uNrrDD srATEs As REgERvED rN urilno sTATEs pA?ENT RECoRDED August 16, 1909,
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 542.
11, RESERVATION AS To TI{E NORTIIWEST 1.14 oF SECTION 12 T0WNSHIP 5 SOUIIH, RA}IGE
8I T{EST oF THE RIGHT oF IIAY oT THb TJNITED STATES, TTS PERI'IITTEE OR'
LICENSEET TO ENTER UPON, OCCUPY AI.ID USE AIIY PART OR AIJII OF SAID LAI|D fOR
THE PURPOSES PROVIDED rN THE ACT OF ,tuNE 10, I1ZO (41 SAT. 1063) A5
REsnRvED rN THE pATENt REcoRDED ocroBER 2, j-gae rn BooK 13? AT PAGE 405.
12. RESTRICTM COVENANTS, WHICIi DO NOT CONTAIN A FORSETTURE OR REVERIIER
CLAUSE, BUT oT,IITTING RESTRfCTIONE, IF Al{Y, BASED oN RACE/ coLOR, REI,I!Io{^'-
oR NATTONATJ ORIGIN, AS CONTATNED iN rNStnirMENT RECORDED April 04, 1978, I{
BooK 26s AT pAGE oig AND As AI*{ENDED rN rNsrRttMENt REcoRDED Augugt 25' 1987'
IN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 447 THROUGH 472 AND AS RERECORDED TN INSTRI'IIENT
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 IN BOOK 469 AT pAGE 801, A}ID AS N'IENDED IN
rNsrRrrMENT RECORDED MAY 2, 1990 rN BOOK 528 Af PAGE 154.
13. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRT TIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED AI|ENDED PL,AT OF GLEN I.YON SUBDMSION.
14. FTFTEEN rOOT IItf IrfTY AND DRAINAGE EASEI.IENT AITONG THE WEST LCrf I,INE Of
SUBJECE PROPERtI As SnonN ON THE N'IENDED PLAT oF GLEN L'YoN SUBDMSION'
.l
l'
PAGE
oo oo
A) The subJect real property may b& located in a epectal taxrng dietrict.
B) A certificate of raxee Due rlsting each taxing juriedlction
may be obtained from the County Tieasurer or {fr6 County Treesurerr s authoriaed agent.
c) The information regardlnq speciar distrlats and the boundaries of such dlstricte may be-obialned fron the Board of county corquissioners, the c6unty clerk and RecordBr, or the county AsEeEsor.
Required by Sehate Bllt 9A-I43
': l.
I
il LAND rITLE GUABANTEE eoUPANY l{
,t
tl
DISCLOSI'RE STATEMENT
Requlred by gBnate BiII 91-14
A) A certif,icate of raxe6 Due rlsting each taxlng Juriedlctlon shall be obtalned fron the county Treaeurer oi ine county Treasurerrs authorized agent.
7
J^i- EH'l- l'---*.r-:
DEC- 5-95 TUE 9:33 BECK. & ASSoCIATES FAX N0, 3039490318
o,*,,*...11,L11 "i
*o''1|'tq?'?-'
IE Dtcqnbct 4r t995
nEl Hovcy XGdd*doc, 1339 Wsilrvcn circle'rrl2:1, olrn Ltul
I D;rr li$illl
I
:
I
1
I
I .l
ll
l,
{t
'C
f , ut F.e?
" -l' r'
i!
;'l
ii t_
i:
ii
i1
i:''t'
l+rrea ltEtsttotl
fqun of Vrll
DArrtmcnt ol Oonnnrnity DwclopnCIt
' ?5 S. Ftoffi|! Itd
Yrll @ E1557
Wo unrbrrHrd lbrt fF tr C hu not bGEtl egEoted bv tF D$ilntqFt qt Cornt@lf
o jtnr"-,i"t *."u* thr tuildlttr b iYL uo-to'ft irn [i$r rlloqarrlc in dtru locrfmrr' Wo ili;ltilfi d-d;rd;-ilEl,i;d.,'*;ii;d f,o repo'rod bv fto. Dlntttlns +d
E*|nd;dhl O0rttrlllf$oo;C;1thttrt 4s btt rtronrd r lrciihrmtinrti
'|+be
Uprwuf ty
C DEC, tb.t F;d; d Us rof thrl Il rtoy-l tho n|ltirnurn bdluhgtll|hr rlormrru mu|t be
ffi;il:-r'ifihrti.*- *d"&r$ of-rddtfi'il;Dn* i131,fi5d il-i tsttlt of csilb-uo.l
oa,*fr,,+Um s $r nrUilIiny iic"""-iitr* t rtu conUocU ot illc owu, 0f lhIPI
pradoul rgpr$tnl ddiltr trI!.
Wc rslnowhd$ th* rb Tgwn sf Vdl w[l rflgy ur t{r cdddttuo oonrtuctton on Sro buildlng
It "ut oLn iti[itiF, *r rF.lqnsrl|d0r tlrilt I/r rurrnr Sr rny s[B flt6datd Slth dl
&dtont aad rsrllilfu of thc rqof, Afild Sc wilrc ilotDe rlFmwd.
Wo wlll nor wodr or 111y frdon of te roof. rq$rdlssc of ilr confrrnity uiith thl hlshl
rqulrcmnnt"
Wc rctnonilodgo tbsl rhflld r hdlht verhnco not bo ruO$\,qt, no tdtlliloorl lurp*dmr- wtll
o0au, ffi rbould f tCO it inurd, utll tlrat portion of the nof rbovr thg $rrtmn buildlllt-
b{hi rtto*uoc l* norovcd, udra Il.C ir-rubnittd ud rmrorrd by ftc llelonnpm of
Cournuds DevehpmrnL
. lr " r t
'.},-t ')!
,.t.
;, ift
:' ... {
i
I
,!t
. |l!
l-
\i.
| 'z
r-
b2-/-?f O
fe. f ./l*n /7. r lfl C-na7-
,/y'trv : z'*xc e'"(U
h".tr ,&s,4ao f:,s.
o
Qere- /at€ft,' 'Qy A4zE bzuers+rLn- -P5/4--btkrrt,n;fr d* /,c-7ht /*A4t,4f 3 fu*.u 4-r- /4 ,rrb,o* Z-l,6o
,,tr- /33? Wsl*t*, &EZ. -bVAE 4/+
'/rp//u -52 4n 7 hrF a;/"eL Da.zd
,b" refdtre./ # ,brrq &J< b frft ,t , y'D'aorTrtunzh& . /a r- yo/*n ., S
+a 4n",- m UaVs/zz.;fiun- ,fur*ss ,* D/4+ h)< ft-r,e da,nq ,'n #is
f/ry,--6:t ,::t -e{fr4' fl 4*#"7
( n azt' SuL/rtrsioa a Ve tr 6ter( , $so, reelze 6*t
6-t issk-< /a -b b. &arr' tJ"/ a/-
',4. P; r /ae/ (;e 4< /Vp.,z-zt<-i,f1nk , )z{u */,q ( tzf.e k<
r.... { v sr-w |l*flf pobb4
Sttur-/1 ,
("
q4q -i/o 0
. {.- ..U;gn Review Action Fnt
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number l7
Project Name:
Building Name:
Orner, Address and Phone:
" ^./?Legaf Descripti oni Lot' tL:/ Block
Proiect Street Address:
Subdivision
Comments:
Zone District S'D')
Motion by:Vote:
! Approval
3 Disapproval
!$atf Rpproval
Seconded by:
Con:ditions:
DRB FeE Pre-paid
33 :a : Se
ieg t;H
5':;!S:
>oE
E gE
bE I E*,
€l$
-9 a8
s- s.;
=90 sit ;E9
Eig
t
3_P
ut5
Q 9,5 ;tF ut o=E6E Io3
Scro>
i93E
tO
O)
I o
GI
I (o
(d +,
.=
E
-o
a
(d
:0 L o
q.
=
E
.9 E
b
c .qi
g;
;9
3q
P.I g;
5
E
.2
o
.9 o
t
'a
o
a a!EE FE
= ro;H;8F I e.:t*
Es IE
EE H;
rE EH
93 {C
Eil EF
5! E;6E PE
Ei cr
at,
o)
o z
1-\Y
,.o
6
-9
IJJ
!,E .=
(_)
€).(t
a o '=
F
g9
83 :b
->:E;
E c (5
:^
SH CN 9$o6t 'ov >L oo;gc)
d, 9
I
'€'t
x I
5
c
t
5 a,"6\G'V.V s l$ --7-
'ffi"'' -.7-b4 " -7^\':i;s ns?>., ,/, ,_,
'l'4
'r i, - I o*'-1
3€:6 ri Ro
i'e:
3.:E 5ix o 6-5 ! ;"g >oi Eg;
r.
!
9 a
I
t'- I lO:
Eet
€:$
9E8
6. l;
=90 Sil rEi
Ejg
lo
O)
I lt-(\I
I
O)
(!
.=
-o
U)
E o
.Q
o E
d.c
'6
5
a
I
i
I
.s&
;9
. 3q t*I;
o
.9
o
EC o=!:z6 a=
eE
F5
E.3 3g
4F
'oA-Y
o
(!
o tr g .o
5
o
.d
o o
=
o
F
I
I
.E
!
E 't
I
5
a
]
!
.a .lO o)
I
.(\l I.
CD
o o o
=(t)
l
.lo o,
I
ol
I o)
o o o
=a
E'
(s
-cl
gF
= t..6$
o.o)o-oE :F s8
n HE 5t
-?
E':E I 9.;!E
Ee !E
6t H.-. =r EH EH
EEEE
H'FH
Ei EI
o
O
o z
83 :6 d Ro
!'s=;t.8
'
.!g g:.I
5C;
)oi E 3E
bE
3ap
€*$t-o
-e F8
e- g-;
E90 ItJ ;EE
E€g
.t'
6=-= (!
v!6.,
sJt
Ll c. i:
cc6 3
HgE
rO
O)
I
O)
C\I
I (o
(U
.=
E
-o
a
(d
:0
o E c
(U
=.A
3F c 1.-OC\
(Do),c)->L
9E t9
i
!
I
I lct
a'
5b 9.o.9
-]oo
E,9
9€
v,q,
o z
E
0,c
rU cl
g
a9
Bf -=
F; eF
i ee ;E:
Es 5E
E' H<&a
=&:E EE
EI EE 3P E -ia EE
HT EI d6 Hi .
;
:
E!t:
6€
3E
d,
()
o)
I
<\l
I o
o o €o
E
C (d
'-o
o c o o
o
o
E o (E
o
ct
Ei
9E
E'
.o9
?-
as '!6 d Ro
ieE
T.:E 5 ix
! i.g )-:
3- A-i
d t E.
€$!6 !E(\|o?
;fl
Ii >9 9o
E1
az
()
(O
@
o tt
s o 5 o
3.
o
c,
'.9
1r)
o)
I
|.,-
GI
I o
(6
E
E
-o
a
E o o
o E
I
l
E c (g
-o e6 E?'f l.- .6$ge
OE IF
H8
\
t
I
i i<t
.!a;it
o.9
EE E}oo
v.i
ts6
A \l-.oll---.\1
/-K {.lr}+-Y
rO
o)t ol t,o)
o o o
=U)
o
90'x!gi
e3
6€
6.8
g
e9
aa
E;88 ? i?x 3 =-* E9
E.; '8
EE E;
=E 6b
EI EE 59 E .g' iH
Et di i6 Et .
i.i
i]9c
3r
Bg
e
I
I
I
I
i
I
---i
ro/
CD'Nl dl
I
utl
B\
F1 6i U'
o
I
Elect
+
t
I
il m'o clte
I
l
I
6toc
I
r'S r(!th ia
.E
\,
t\l.-:.*
1ro '1' t {k
trl l-- -- -- rAsPhall ll
en ci
\!i \-'ri "Lr 'Fl \t/+
- water -
,\l \l
\. l/-\#-
Westhav
)w f\il iuf \. I
T
o
GI
'
;
f,.
2 a
$
E.
5
t '?.
rlzt
l'r
d,
02.
,p
9,t
t'
1,9,,
,r-
E10g
"18"or
per T(
I
I
I
'Conct
per T(
I
I
t
I
I
.
t@ ,$
0-16 ii I
7'n4/
16; :1
#6IIW
raltil
'i .- -' 8100'
4'
I
I sr:)rrlHJJY JI]LlYmuJtNUl/ lJl"l c/5t 9lt u0u
Rt['i; ', j ?'W5-a\)
Retum to LAUREN WATERTON
Town Planner
DATE SUBM
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
?€c.,er!eA 1l\1lq<€e,sraxA 1tb4s Berorc.cA 1.rq.q6
Tet*.14 rerrsa-Date: aut rB,'l$b
Comments:
\nstcr,\ r^ho^ 619 rr. 4' porr <rf ktre dri.le\'scqodqa (cea'rto\'; \5.6$5\cx\o'rr
i;i;i;i eer*tq\ to r€ffir raqoi.o\e*. (Abc"e\o'/') \)
{oosvlo,rrA trq.lo rSttrde thedri€ 1 aloggold to addinlhol-'
pof lCqPoveo. PLEAS€ €65t,Br4lT'
UBLIC WORKS
,trir.d t lfYeA
CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
Legal Description: Lot ?3 Block -Suktvision Glen Lyon Subdv Filing[Olil
Date of Expiration:_
Addresg:@co
Account Number: !!1Q!!!1!!@
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 15
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this r 0 day "t *g Y 19-g5by
and among Beck & Assoc. , Inc. (hereinafter called the 'Developer"), and the TOWN
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the "Town").
WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval s1 6e Hovey Residence
plans, dated Jrrne ?e 19_g5wishes lo enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement;and
WHEREAS, lhe Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the
judgment ol the Town to make reasonable provisions lor completion of certain improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral lo guarantee perlormance of
lhis Agreement, including construclion of the above-referencsd improvements by means of the
following:
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit with the Town of Vail in a dollar amount
of $-!!-.lzu!.- (125% ot lhe total cost ol the work shown below) to provide security
for the following:
IMPROVEMENT
I- Landscapinlt per attached - Schedule A - to replace trees on a one to one basis. Total inches lost will be replaced with same number of inches in a minimum of 2L caliper per T.O.V- requirements. Cost: $13,875.00
2- schedule B - cost to backfirl and compact originar grade including topsoil as necessary- AII grades to rnatch existirrg - Cost: $12,625.00
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ol the following mutualcovenants and
agreemenls, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and material necessary to perform and complete all improvements, on or before
september 1, 1995 The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office ol the community Development Department, the Town of vail, and to do allwork
incidental therelo according lo and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other maner
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaclion ot. the Town Engineer, lhe Town Building Officiat, cr other
official lrom the Town of Vail, as aftected by special districts or service districts,
as their respeclive inlerest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town ol Vail Community
Development Department and Public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee performanc€ of its obligations as set forth herein, lhe
Developer agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
Page I of 3
A cash deposit account in the amounl ol $33,125.00 to be held by the Town, as
esclow agent, shall provide lhe security lor the improvements set forth above if there is
a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may al any lime substitute lhe collateral originally set forth
above tor another form of collateral acceptable to lhe Town to guaranlee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and the perlormance of the terms ol this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative collateral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in
lhis Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of lhe same, nor shall lhe Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of lhe
nature of said work, bul all of said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereol) that arise out of or are
based upon any perlormance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or detending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize tor partial rslease of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category
of improvement al such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition willthe amount of the collateral that is being held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such ipprovements.
6. lf the Town determines that any of the improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set forth herein by the date set
forlh in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall not be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary to complele the unfinished improvements. The
Town shall releass such funds upon the wrilten request of the staff of the Community
Developmenl Department stating that the improvements have not been completed as required
by the agreement. The Town shall not require the concurrence of the developer prior to the
release of the funds, nor shall the Town be required to verify independenily that the
improvements have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon the requsst of the Community Developmsnt Department.
lf lhe cosls ol completing lhe work exceed ths amount of the deposit, lhe oxcess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer ol Eagle County to be
collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf
the permil holder fails or reluses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning code.
7. The Developer warrants all work and material for a period of one year after
acceplance of all work referred to in this Agreement by the Town pursuant to Section
1 7.1 6.250 if such work is located on Town of Vail propefi or within Town of Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties hereto mutuallv agree that this Agreement may be amended from
lime to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by allparties hereto.
Dated the day and year first above written.
Page 2 of 3
@ Ili l.'Zil' p ?".f \W;f,"y,
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNW OF EAGLE
ss. BiII Anderson
Wilness my hand and officialseal.
My commlssion explres:
before me his
Witness my hand and officlalsEal.
Lauren lfaterton
My commlssi o" ereines*h5
upd..d 92U9a
Page 3 ol3
Job Name: Eovey Residence ilob Address: 1339 l{esthaven Circle, Vail''- CO
Legal oesc@ck_Slsn iiri"s
Qo* oF vArr., coNsrRucrrolO
PERI,TIT APPLICATION FOR!{
DATE: z/rnlqq
APPLICATION I.TUST BE SILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED
****************************** PEII!{IT TNFORMATION ********************r********
[x-]-8uilding [ {]-Plurnbing Ix]-Electrical [ ]-Electrical [ ]-other
Owners Name: ch@lAddress: 0 woodholm Road ph.50852674(
Architect: Dave PeeI Address: P.O. Box L2O2, YaiL ph. 476-4506
ceneral Description: tiles Residence
Work Class: I I-New [ ]-Alteration [ ]-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-Other
Nunber of Dwelling Units: 1 Number of Accommodation Units:
Number and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances Gas Logs-l Woodr/Pellet
* **** ******* *** *** ***** *** ******* * VALUATIONS * *** *** ** * ****** **** *** **********
BUILDING: $545,850-00 EL,ECIRICAL: $22'280.0o
PLI'}'BING: SU7,AE:d,6- MECHANICALz ffi
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * col{IRAcToR INFORIIATION
General Contractor: Beck dnd Associates
Address: P.O- Sox lO
OTHER:
TOTAL: S619,778-00
* **** **i****** *************
Town of VaiI Reg. No. U7A
Phone Nurnber: 949-1800
Town of Vail Reg. No.
Phone Nunber:
Town of Vail
Phone Nurnber:
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
Reg. NO.
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
N/A
Plunbing
Address:
Contractor:N/A
Mechanical
Address:
Contractor: N/A Reg. NO.
******************************** FOR OFFICE USE *******************************
BUILDING PERMIT FEE:
PLt I.IBING PERMIT FEE:
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
BUILDING PIAN CHECK FEE:
PLI,'MBING PI,AN CHECK FEE:
MECHANICAL PIAN CHECK FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
BUILDING:VALUATION
ZONING:
THE GARDEN CENTN OF EAGI.*E.VAIL ;eFffi;A lr{ofihewr f'Asodotca [ondsephg. Inc.
SCHEDULE "AU
July 7, 1995
Bcck & Ascociatcs
780 NottingbanRoad
Avon Colorado
Re: r.andscepe Rcclemadon st thc Hovey Resldcncc, t339 westbaven clrcle.
DearKim:
Ihant you for calling Matthews & Associates with the landscape reclamation of the Hovey
KiesrccDoe.
Marthews & Associatcs is a Landscapc Architcctur dcsig/build firu, sprccinlizing in nsidentinl
and Commercial landscape coustructio[. h addidon to o& acsim/build iaoalititie-s we also bave iniguiq!.and maintcnnric diyrqionr, along wiih Thc Gardon Ce;rer of Eagfe-Vail. a rcta.il garden
centcr. Thcsc divisions allow Mantrcws &-A$socirilE$ to bc r fult scrvicc laidrcupc compE ry.
Per our convcrsatiout, Mettltcuts & Associates estimatcs tlat tlc cost to ryclairn any disturhcd
areas duc to ansrualon is 813,875.00 (Thineen Tlousand Eight Hundrcd S*enry F$e Dotlsrt)-
Plcasc cdl with any iguostions.
Sinccrcly,
Richard H.
Landsc4o
Thlt qt&a,atc r'lll nmah la tfrcot for 30 dayt.
TOTfl- P.g1
SGIEDULE rB.
Scott Green Excavating, Inc,
P.O. Box Ul37
Gypnrm, CO t1637
Iuly ll, 1995
Bcck and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 4030
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Roclaim I-ot23, Glen Lyon, 1339 Westhaven Circle
Price $12,625.00
Includcs: compaction, and grade brought to original aftcr a completcd excavation
for footers and foundation per plans set dated- 6t29lgi urd stnrctural sct datcd
7t3t9s.
Sinccrely,
Scott Green
Scott Green Ercavating, Inc.
sG/di
TOWNOF VAIL
r)
.^-, Eo r/( .',1 HWNr0FcovMUI.n';-*'-
ADDR'..- --\----A- 1- _--il1/e/ DArE 1&,"-".. l\l/' S*to. Mrfu^^%i t /
CIIECKS MADE PAYABLE TO TOWN OF VAIL
-r8|rll.l CrF LJFI I t_
l'liscel I anec,u:: Cagh
t:li-1+-35 1f,:4?: 15
FiE.EiFt. + i7b151
Flcr:crr_rrrt. ++ t:'1,:. # i.:Etf,
F_:Er::i.: !:, Ft:,:,Lri'..lrEr.tELr:rF,EF: I t'1F HrjF;8f, I,lft lT
fitrt,::r*rri i L,':n'Jrirg,j i ii;riiil5. r.ftl
Itenr paid Frount psid
_1i'i1$r:1[1::FiE,r]r:1[r lli:5. rj,*
[:ir':r1Jtr r+ t L.r i-frE'j .: . . . .-1.-j
-rHJf]-tl< vctl-r
'i,:r-r r c.::h:i*f HEI[ii
REC. BY:v
Olign Review Action Ftn
TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: 'i
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone:
Comments:
Ekfffitien -t> -r
naotion oy: f}t./ l') L), r t-i c,, vote:
/- rr -1,
Seconded Oy: ' Yr \ \ ..r T-'r litt',i v'r1
-&Rpprovat
! Disapproval
! StaffApproval
i')
o
ilv
DATE:
I,EGAL DESCRIPTION:LoL 7V Brock
ADDRESS: I
OWNER
ARCIIITECT DNVIA ?It I
zoNE DiSTRTCT j:
PROPOSED USE .-:>tlIi.l
LOT SIZE
(l[bDY zfi :
1)4:) Y ,lo
lleiqht
/o.ot
"o"o lrimary cnnn
Single Fam
ZONE CHECK
. FOR
Residence, Duplex, Pri
ZONE DISTRICTS
4lzrfto
/Secondary
Subdivision 1olt ., \ Ll'rvvz
PIIONE
PIIONE
o
mary
zzr;40',€:4 BUII,DABLE
Exi s Einq
LOT AREA
'' ) r.h
-tr r,,4 Allowed
,/-(30f_(33,
&r)/\-1 _.J__2.-..t_-
Proposcd
A"-"
+frtt
LA77.| | ,-." -.t
ToLal
-.|.,2,
-*-
+b33
/sctbacks
/si t.o covcrage
/t andscaping
/R"Euirri.rg wall
//parxinq
/6aragc Crcdir
/oriue.
Front.
S ides
Rear
z-Dao
Lro"lo
IteighLs
20'.
L5't5r-'
/fu
TFT7t55 O+
2;247 |-4-
l-* tr,A
-..Y .
+
33q,1
2- enc]-
reqLiest j.nvuive a
of Lhe allowed 250
'j ueqrd
r:ool'iiool.lgool ozoot 4l(t
YES X
lli)
PercenL Slope (< > 30%)
Geologic Ilazards
a) Snow Avalancho t'-'
b) RockfaIl
c) Debris Flow
4 ) wet lands 'tr
uoi )
ZtrU .T(]UI LIOII 'I t.,.
AddiLion is used wit-h this rcques L?
NO
o
J-J rnvironmen La1 /IIazards :L)
zt
1l
/v :,o, Corridor EncroachmenL :Yes
../w,- - - Ll-: -v r-r\Jr=o Lll J. D
llow much
r:
y'Previous condiLions of approval (check properLy file):
PermitLed slope 9z Proposecl stop& z
t]Compfies wich T.O.v. LighLinq Ordinance Yes
/water course Scl-back (30) (s0)
-!-' Do trinish Grades Exceed 2:1 (50%)
Flood Plain
10
qg
iii
fri
E
o
I
I I
f
I
!I
b
$
.,
I
!
I q
I f f,
I
s
?
I
I
I
.E
6
.E
UJ
o
.g o
g
G E
.A g
t'
t;
Es ):
TI
it
!
I I
I I
I
I rh
F
Its td P.
tiIi
I
o
I
I
E
Ii s
!i!
s
1
I I .I
t I
T
h
li F:
iftiff rtl
iltr il
.E
T llJ
E
't
E o
t t
I g
I
ut
F
tg
iii fii
tf,I
@
€a i I
E
E
B
I
I I
!.,t
E
I
E
p
!t ir
ii ii dtr
iI
II
-'t
I
I
i
I
I
s
T I
i !t
I t
5
F t
I !
s
I D
I I ii
I I I
i t
ts ri Ro
o:r'
;'s t
irE !ij
fri
E
II
.t l!
ii
EE
e!
if rI !:
ii
t:
5i
t
!
E
F
E
!
I {
E I
3 I
t
E
ii
ig
EE
,s!
I
I
I
l
s
d a b
a I
1
{I l
I ',iI
s
I I
F
F
x
I
t ll
lo .9|):3 'El
TE r!nt
5i
FI
I
I
E
a
t
a.t.t t..A 7llal91
DESIGN REVIEW APPIJICATTON ' TOWN OF
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETTNG:
t*rl**t****
o
BOAX,D VAIL, COIJORADO
May 17, IQQS ,,.
ra***rl*****r.
A.
PROJECT INFORMATTON:
DESCRIPTION: Sinsle family Lgsidence located in Special Develo
TYPE OF REVTEW:
X New ConstrucLion ($200.00)Addition ($50.00)
ADDRESS. 1339 Westhaven Circle
Minor A1 t.eraLion ( 920 . 00 )Conceptual neview (90)
D.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LoE Subdivision Glen Lyon
Block N/A
a meets and bounds leqal
on a separate sheet and altach
If properby is described by description, p1€iase providL
Lo this applicat.ion.
ZONfNG, SDD No. 4, Area C, Glen Lyon Duplex Lots, (Brimary/Secondar
NAME OF AppLICANT. Charles and Nancy Hovey
Mail.ing Address
'Manchester. Massachusetts 01944
It.NAME qF OWNER151 ; Charles and Nancy Hovey
OWNER(S) SIGNATURE:
I.
,t.
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OWNER'S STGJVA?UR.E
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are Lo be paid at. Ehe Lime of submileal of t.he DRB applilacion. t,it.er, when applying for a building permit., please idenLify the accurar,e valuation of the proposal. Tbe Town of VaiI witl adjust. the fee according uo the table below, Lo ensure t.he correcE fee is Paid j zr^,/ ,[/ t l ._ ]
.r" ,oro, E&tD? c"".* o,8luc oo*r,v t?/?{", l la,,r,4 {l*,
FEE SCHEDULE: )FEE SCHEDULE:
VAIJUATION
,ri n ,lr a n a\n.r I v I J.v,uuu $ 10, 001 - $ s0, 000 $ 50, 001 - $ 150, 000
$1s0, 001 $ s00, 000
$s00, 001 - $1, 000. 000 $ over $1, 000, 000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL EXPIRES
APPROVAL ITNIJESS A BUIIJDING pERIttIT IS IS STARTED.
FEE
,p zU. vU
$ s0.00
$r.00.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
ONE YEAR AFTER FINAI,
ISSUED ATiID CONSTRUCTION
NAME OF APPLICANT,S REPRESENTATM: David M. peel . AIA Mailing Address : PEEL/LANGENwALTER ancsrfRTF-
Mailing Address: 0 Woodholm Road
Manchester, Massach
APR- 1B-95 TUE L? 224 EIG EUG P SBE ="6 ?464 P. A2
rrvrr.l 1/ rl /tl
DEgrSt REvIElf bOAnD APPITIGATTOH ' TO|{N OF VAI!r COLORADQ
DATE RECEIVSD:
D^TE Or DBB IIEETSNGI -UaJLJ4*rc95'=--*--lltttltlrl
I.
A.DESCRIPtIgIt: Singlg Iamil
Disrrict No. 4, Area U, Uren
i*ri*ltilr
residence 1 ed
on ljup.tex ts. Pro
PiOOE-CtrItsE9BSATIPH!
e57Is flow hazar
B.TYPE OF RBVIEWI
X.--New Construc[lqn ($200. 00)
-ladltion ($s0.001
Mlnor Alterablon
---
concephual Rovlo',r
($20.00)
($0)
1339 Westhaven Circle
D.
ADDRE9S I
TJEGAL DESCRIPTION! I'ob
subdivision .G-le+!Xg!
If property is described bY
des-orlpti.on, P1€iage Provlde to this applicaiion.
E.
F.
x
v
V&I,UATTON
.i A tt
'\ AAA v O lvrVVV
$ 10, 00r - $ 50,000
$ 50.001 0 150,000
$150,001 f s00, ooo
$500. 001 - s1,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000
DESIGN REVIET{ EOAN.D APPROVAI{ EXPIRES
APPROVAIT t IIIJESS A EUIIJDIIIG PSRMIT IS
16 $TARTED.
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
0100.00
$200.00
${ 00. 00
$500.00
ONE YEAR AFIIIER fINAI,
16SUED AIID CONSTRUCTION
Block -N4-.*.----.*-
a neeLs and bounds Iegal
on a separaLe sheet And att'ach
ZONX,NGI SDD.,Sr.I!-AT"e-E.C, G-r.eL!y-o" BqPl." It-t,s f):-
NAttE OF APPIJI CANT' - char1:sinq..I3+cv Hov'ql:
Mailing Addressr - 0- Jo.9{l?1m Road -#ffi rusetts AL?44 -* Phone _).ud;)z,P-tf-4,-,
G.
l{,
NA.I,TE OF APPIJI CANT, S REPRES ENTATIVE I *.Da:r1d_I,I,*.PSE1*JIA"Malling Addreas:
P.O,*Bg{1202- iaj.l.' Coloradg-8.165& .. - Phons
NA!|E qF OIINER(s); qhq{d Nancy Hove
or{rvEir (,f)., ,flonr-eTuRBr, _(Nancy Meyer HoveY)
Mailing Address' o lJoodholm\oad
Manchester. Massachusetts 01944 Fhone
APPLICA?fOHS ,frl& NO" ss FffOCE.tfED FrrftlOUT Otr'i\IER'S ,tfOMfqEE
I. Condominiurn Apprgval if applicabrc.
J. DRB FE;: DRB fees, aB thown 36eve,\ are to be paid aL Lhe
Lime of subrrriet.al of Lhe DRB applipation, LaLer' lthen
epplylns for a butldtnq permiL, Please idontify thc ilccuraie
viiuaeion of Lhe propoaal. The Town of vail will adjust Uhe
fee accordlng to the table belot, LQ enBure bhe correct fee
is Paid'
FpE SqHSPUIJE_!,
Manchester, Massachusetts
I,TST OF MATERIALS
NAME OF' PROJECT: HOVEY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCB
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT I BI,,ocK N/A SUBDIVIsIoN
STREET ADDRESS. 1339 Wesrhaven Circle
The following information is required for submiccal
Review Board before a final approval can be Eiven:
A. BUII-.DING II{,ATERIAIIS: TYPE oF }'ATERIAIJ
Roof Cedar shingJ-es
Glen Lyon
to the Design
cor.oR
Natural
Sidins
OLher Wall Materials
Fascj.a (see attached sketch)
Sof f i t,s
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Stucco [a Habra X-855 Sunburst
Stone River rock w/mortar joints.
Built-up cedar
2x8 and 2x10
NaturaL tone cedar.
Olynpic semi-trans. 716
Door Trim
l{and or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining walls
Ext.erior Light.ing
Other
LANDSCAPING: Name of
6tt T&G cedar Olympic semi-trans. 716
Ro11ed stucco corners
and sEone sil1 .Match stucco and stone.
Custom wood entry. NaturaL.
Clad French.Match Devoe 1M53E Frosty Flint
Ro11ed stucco corners. Match stucco.
(See attached sketch)
Decorative cedar. 0lympic serni-trans 716
l,latch ad jacent materials.
MetaL Match adjacent materj.als.
Stucco La Habra X-855 Sunburst
N/A
N/A
Concrete (stucco finish) La Habra X-855
Surface mounted.See attached photo.
Shutters and
window boxes.
Designer:
Phone:
Olympic semi-trans. 716
PEEL/LANGENWALTBR ARCHITBCTS, L.L.C.B.
970-476-4506
PLANT MATERI
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
t.rees.**Indicate size of
5 qallon.
: Botanical Name
Picea Pungens
Picea Puneens
Populus Tremuloides
ao* o,Qu..OuanLi Lv Size*
Colorado Spruce L 8t-10r min.
Colorado Spruce 3 6r-8t min.
*Indicate caLiper for deciduous trees. t',tinimum catiper fof deciduous trees is 2 inches. rndicat.e nffis
Aspen
--
4 3" caliper
Asoen 7 _4_Eliper
Aspen 2 clump
r coniferous trees is 6 f proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is
GROUIID. COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRTGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION COIfTROL
Type Square Footaqe
SHRUBS: Potentil-l-a Fruiticosa poLentilla 5 ga1.
5 gal.Cotoneaster Acutifolia Cotoneaster, Peking
Amelanchier Alnifolia Native Serviceberry 5 gaI.
Per plan.
Automative drip system to trees, shrubs, pLanting beds.
Erosion control bl-ankets as required.
LANDSCAPE IJIGHTING: If exterior f.iqhting is proposed, please show the number of f ixt.ures and l_ocations on- a ieparate liqhting plan. Idenr.ify each fixture from rhe fi;hting plan
J{r the space below and provide Lhe height above giade, -type of Iight. proposed, lumen ouE.put., luminous area ana i cuc sheet. of t.he light f ixr,ure. (Secr.ion j.8.54.050 J)
N/A (Exterior lighting surface mounted on building).
D.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pooIs, etc.) Please specify. Indicace heights of ret.ainini walrs. Maximum height of warrs within Lhe front setback ii 3'. Maximum heiqhe of walls elsewhere on the property is 6,.
Stacked boulders: 3t max. in froirt setback, 3.5r at garage.
Concrete debris flow mitigation walls (stucco finish): 5'
5
at
at
patio,
o o
i
i
I
,:-.-.::.:':-.'':.'.:'-'':,':':::..'.---.:-.''..'''.''''_,*.\"^
1 u _ftUlMjLnvmI 1.24 16.. _ j , '-_--._ t-l 1
I
I
I 'l
I
I
I
I
o o
+4+ 46
DATE:
Single ramily
Aprll 2:4, L995
ZONE CHECK
FOR
Residence, Duplex,
ZONE DISTRICTS
Primary/ secondary
SDD No. 4, Area C,
+ 425
a.l_L@,
(30) (33)
4,929 SF
= N/A
Existino Proposed Total
N/A 33r 331
N/A
N/A
4,855 SF 4,855 SF
+ 425- =__NLA_
20,
15,
L5,
4,508 SF
40 1 (Westhaven
!.a.5.y-LL.s'
N/A
Circle)
N/A 3,402 SF 3,402 SF
al /q,l
2 Encl
sLope 08 t
No
NO
> 30t) N/A
N/A
3'15'
2.5 neqrd
(300) (600) (900) (12991 47r SF
Permit,t,ed slope 08 t Propose{
Complies wit,h T.O.v. Liqhting Ordinance
wat,er Course Secback (30) (50)
Do Finish Grades Exceed 2:t (50%)
Environmen ta J. /Hazards :Flood PLain N/A
Percent Slope (<
Geologic Hazards a) Snow Avalanche_[l b) nockfall c) Debris Flow@
lview Corridor Encroachment:
Dses ihis reques[ invoivc a 250.Addition?
How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used wiLh Lhis
Previous condiLions of approval (check property fiLe):
Yes
II/ A
, YES
1)
2)
3)
4) wetlands
Yes No
LEGAI, DESCRIPTION: Lot, 23 Block N/A Subdivision Glen Lvon Duplex Lots.
ADDRESS:
OVINER Charles and Nancy Hovey PHONE 5O8-5?6-7461t
PEEL/LANGENWALTER ARCHI1ECTS, L.L.$HONE 970-476-4506 ARCHITECT
ZONE DISTalgl Primary/Secondary (See "Subdivisionrr above..)
pROpOSED ggB Single famiLy residejnce (one unit).
LOT SIZE 22,540.54 SF - BU1LDABLE IJOT AREA
Height
TOTA1 GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
.Setbacks Front
Sides
Rear
Si t,e Coverage
Landscaping
Ret.aining WaII Heights
.Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
1.0
requesE? N/a
ILITY I.,OCATTON VERIFTCATT
roe NAME Hovey sul_elE IAMrtyffi Lar zz BLocK tll
SUBDMSION Glen Lyon Duplex LoE,s
ADDRESS 1339 Westhaven Circle
The locar,ion and availability of utiliE.ies, wheLher
!ry$ lines or proposed Lines, musE. be approved and following utiliLies for Lhe accompanying-iif.e plan.
Authorized Sionature
they be main veri.fied by ehe
.'
DaLe
4-t7 -1s
U.S. West Communications
1 - 800 - 922- t957
468-6860 ot 949 -4530
Public Service Company
949 - s?8L
Gary HaIL
Holy Cross ElecLric Assoc.
949 - 5892
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.v.. 949 - s530
Steve Hiat t
Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation Dist.rict *
476-748-0
Fred tiaslee -.,. - z/rr/"{ry,.-,./74/rr.T service availability and
/n-Qs-
,f -,2 -r,
NOTE: 1.
J.
/u6fuc/This form is to verifv location. This should preparing your utiliLy installations.
For any new const.ruction proposal , Lhe applicant must. provide a bompleced ut,iij.rv verifici-tion fonn.
If a utili[y company has concerns with the proposed consLruct.ion, the ut.ility representat,ive should not direct.ly on t.he ut.ili uy verif icat.ion f orm thaL there is a problem which needs Eo be resolved. The issue should then be spelled out in deE.ail in an attached letter Lo the Town of vail. However, please keep in mind t.hat it is the responsibility of Lfre utif iEy company Lo resoLve identified problems.
If the urility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no cornment,s are made direcLly on the form, t,he Town witl presume that t,here are no problems and t,ha! the development can proceed.
These verificaLions do not relieve the contracLor of his responsibility to obt.ain a st,reet, cut, permit from Lhe Town of Vai1, Department, of public Works and to obtain ur.iliEv locaLions before diqqinq in any public righL-of-way or easement in ctre town of Vail. .q, buildinc perxnit is not a streeL cut, permit.
A street cuL permit must be obtained separately.
InstallaL.ion of service lines are aL Lhe expense and responsibility of the property ovrner.
be used in conjuncLion with plan and scheduling
9.
5.
A
* Please bring a sit.e plan, ftoor ptan, and elevations when obbaining Upper Eagle valtey Wat,er & Sanit,aEion signatures. r.ire flow needs must. be addressed.
lii; i
,'ri.- 't :'r'. 1li.
ll"
rll
F-. frtFT tt.filt t.,1 :iil i - -,'rr-q.r1'tr
1
: .!,.'''
:,:..'rQQttlltf i{F.Flttttr.{rh$lt-r,Firi1i'r:'
rif iY rh* ig$',{i,iHoh rii,g$i$f}' #H#tr q,:{
+* *r
i-Rj
0t0 HEPuBLtc NATl0l{AL TlTtf lNSUMtlct 00MPANY, I Minnssota corpo€d0n, herein callrd ths comprntJ, h' !
vElu0blo c0nsidsrstion, i0r00y commits to ksus its p0[ct 0l policiss of uie insutanc0, rl identified in schsduh A in lavof
of rhe propoled Insuod named in srhldule A cg owrrsr or mongogee o1 tho ostato or intedst co|lood htqby in th6 lmd
describrd or ralened to in Scheduh A. upon peyment of ttr premiums ond chaqos lherelor; oll subiect to dP pro{sionl ol
$hedulo A ond I snd 10 lho Collditi0ns ond Strpulatronl heaol,
thir Commi(rnent rha[ be, e{{sctive onll when rhs ide1ttity 0l thc Arugosed lngutsd lnd the lmount ol t[r golicy or
p0licios c0mmitt0d tor have been inssnod h Sch0duls A henof by tho C0mp.ry. silher ot lho ims ol ths issuancl ol $is
Conmitmgnt or by sublgQusnt lndorigrnenL
Il r C0mmffit0nl ts prdimtnary to tht hrus||co Ot zucn polhy or polcies ol lth in$urrncr lnd rll lioblily and otligarionl
hsnundtr shlll cets and terninate riI months oftet rlrs slfscdvg dato heaol 0r lrhon tho policy or polcios committed lor
shall issus, wfiirhewr finr occurs, providd drn rho liiluro t0 iseue such policy or policils is not th! f0uh of the Compuy.
c0N0rTtoNs Alr0 sTtPUr,{Tr0lls
l. Ihs rerm "mongoge". when usgd herein. shall include d00d of tust, Itust dsed, or otior secu|itY rnswtmnt.
2. lf tho proposed Inswed has or rcquinr rcruol tnouriodlo 0l rny delecl lien, oncurnbr0ncs. rdwtBe cl0im oa othsr
maur aflmtng ttu ssuu or inrercsl fi mongdlo thgr6on c0v9t0d bv thi$ C9mmimgnr grhs( rhgn thg$B shown in Schedulg B hsnof. and shdl ftl to disclolo surh lno' lcdgr
tothrCompcnyinwriring,tho[ompanY$h0fbinlrvd|romh6ithyforlny|ossordlmEgrlesu|ting|roniiYsct0fl8li0nclhgreoo|othrlltenttobnpny
bylailurroftheproposed|nsurgdtosodi$cl0s0$uchknow|edge.||thrproposrdlnsuredeiattdicc|osssuchknow|edqetoth0c0mpinY,0lifthecodpd0Y0lhNnllirrlcqug
rcrual lnowledge ol eny ruch d0f0c[ lign, gncumbnnce, rdvtr* clgim or orlBr morrer, rha Comptny rt its oplion may omend Scheduh B 0f ihi$ C0mmilmrnt scc0tdingly, bul
such aflsndoenr lhall not relievr lhs Company lrom liability pcviously incur.ed pursuint l0 prdgnph 3 ol these Conditions and Stiplilorons.
3, Lhbility of ths Company under thh Commitmsnr shal br only m tho namod proposed Insured ond such partirs
ioc|udgdundrthgdefinidonof|nluredin$e{orrno|po|icyorpo|icirlcommittsdforendonly|otrctua||osincunedinro|iancgherroninundenrkirtgtngoodhi|l}lo
comph wirh fe loquir0m0nts htoof 0r lbl to lliminrtr ucepriorrs shown in Schldulo E, or kl ro dquire 0r cr0t0 ths est!le 0r inerest or mort0afe $0t80n c0Yedd by this
cornnritment.|nnorwntshl||luch|irhi|ityc0edthe.moUnttt|bdinschsduhA|orthepo|ilyorpoliciescomntitted|orondsulh|hbiityhsU0jl
pmvisronr rnd $r Cgndhions and Slipuhti9n$ rnd thr €nlu onr lrom Covrngc of the form of policy or policigs clmmitlgd lr in favor ol lhl ptopgSgX Insuted whith ln
hersby inc0$08(ed ty re{cnn rnd mrds r grrt ol this Commilqsnt srcgor 8s s)olss$lY m0dilisd h0'rin.
4. Any rcdon or actions or righls ol lcrion rhat the proposer, Iniurod may hrvr or may bring 000in$t thr CornptnY
rri ng our of rhe smrug of the trtle to thl rstrtr or inergst 0i dlo starus of rho n0 g0!0 rhsrson covergd by thh Comoitmertt nrust be t06gd 0n rnd are subi0ct to the
pruvrsonr of ltis Commitmrnl.
sINtlAR0 txcEPTlot{s
In Bddiilon r0 lho manors con$i|lod in tho Condittons rnd Slituhtions rnd lrclurions lrom Covenge tb0v0
reforrsd to, tlris Conunitrnent is lho rubiact D thr l0lt0wl00,
l. Rights ot chiml of panier in posession iot 3hofln bf lho Public nconls.
2. Bsomsnts. or chims ol 0t00m9[t9, nol shown bY the public ncotds,
3. giscngrrciei, conflictr io boundarl lints, rhortagt in eoa. gnctoachmrnts. lnd OnY lacls tdhich r cort3ct
luney and inspecion ol thr lnmisgr would disclose end which lrg flot shotrt,n by $0 public tecordr.
4. Any lhn, or right to a lirn. lor rsruioes. labor or motrdol theoufo(e or hsrsaftw furished, imp0rsd hy lew
ond not thor,vn !t lhs Fublb rccords,
5. 0efrc$, liens, encumbnncrr. rdvstre clrims 0r othet hot$r$. il rnv. croated' lirst oppeanng h the public rucodl
otrtuchhgs!bsgqugnltoths9lhctivrdruhsnofbutpriorto1h€d0t0lhepl0pos0dinrf0d0cqUi.06oft0cordfotva|uetheestoll0rinl0st
Commitmrnt.
lN wllNtss wHtBtot, otd Sopubls Nationat fii8 Insunnce company hss c8u$€d il8 co,por6tt d8m6 ond s[el b
,br horeunlo afii$d hy iri duly authoruod olficcrs on ris deu shown in Scfuduh A, t0 be valid whon countersigned by N vslidaul'0 ollicer qr nlher ruthotind si0nat0ry'
olo SEPUEtiC tATtoilA! rlTrE lilsuRAllcc c0llPAtr
A Stocl Conpanl
{0U ttcond Afttu, ,oalh, filnaeawlis' Minnts|tt 55101
t6t?lan',til
76** fteft"rvn-8l
lrmJl
Pt,/stdanl
$rnrry loohinl Signnoq
0ll lwn 2El2
fJ.f R-1€;95 TUE 17:11 EIE EUG PARTHERS o
IJAND TITL'E GUARANTEE cot'!PANY
' nepreeentlng gld Republic Nattonal Tttle Insurance conpany
TTIA}IK YOU FOR TOUR' ORDER
June 29, 1994
O{rr Order No' I V24385
I
.lbwnn/owNpnr - NAlICy l,l. HovEy
SEIJIJER:
BETTY I.T. THOI.IAS
ADDRESSs
FOR TITLE QUESIIONS CALIJ KAREII HORTH 303 il76-2251
FOR CIJOSfNG QUEsTIoNs CAIJL ARZAIIA RUCKER 303 4?6-225L
see 5?6 ?464 o P. Eg
CI/OSER
Qoplea: I Attn: ARZNIA RUCKER Reference:
SIJIFER' SI,TITH AIID FRAI{PTON
DRAWER 2820
BnavER CREEI(' CO 81620
copiest l--- --^-,-^., i-.o^-----. g45-g400 AtLn: ;IAN JOHNSON Reference:
SLITER, SMITH AI{D FRAI.IPTON
23O BRIDGE ST.
VAII.,, CO 81657
coplea: l----- -..,- ^^,^-----. 478-zAzL Attnl GEORGE LAr,fB Reference' 'r ' 'e-
, APR-1a-es. TUE 1":1lt',rG EUG PARTHERS
AI.BA COMUITI{ENT
5EB o 526 ?464 P. B4
SCHEDULE A
Our Order No. t V24385
l'or Informatlon onIY
- Chargae -
Ar/TA osrner FollcY $11036.00
$',333:33
****T.IITH YOUR REMII:TA}|CE PT.EASE REFER TO OUR ORDER NO. V24385***I
1" Effective Date: June 14, 1994 at g:00 A.M.
z. Policy to be lssued, and proposed Insuredl
rfALTAr Ownerrs Folicy lO-L7-gZ $3651000.00
Propoeed InEured:
NANCY M. HOVEY
3. The estat€ or lntereet in the land deacrlbed or referred to in
' thle Cornmitrnent and sovered herein lsl
A Fee Sinple
4. Tltle to the estate or interest sovered herein is at the
eff,ectlve date hereof, vegted ln!
BETTY M. THOMAS
5. The land referred to in this connitnent le deecribad as
followe t
wI 2g, Gr.EN LyON SUBDTVTSTON, ACCORDTNG l[O THE A}TENDED
RECORDED PrAT THEREOF, RECORDED JULY 18, 1978 rN BOOK 272 AT
PAGE 370, COIINEY OF EAGITE' STATE OF COIORADO'
PAOE 1
.€FR- 1a-es TUE 1? . t2
JE
BUc PARTHERS 59€ 526 7464
ALTA COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B-1
(Raquirenente) our order # ve43s5
[he following are the requirenents to be coltlplied wlth:
1. Palment to or for the acdount of th9 Vranloll or rnortgagora of
the fuLl conslderation for the estata-or lntareat' to be
' lneured.
2, Proper lnstrument(s) creating tha estate^or intereet to be
lneured nust be executed ana'aulv iiiea for record, to-vltl
3. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPAI{Y THAT THE TERMS' CONDITION8 AND
, pROVISIoNs oF THE TOTIN oF vAIL iRANSfpn rlX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED'
4. WARRANTY DEED FROM BETTY M. THOI'IAS TO NANCY M. HOVEY CONVEYING SUB'TEET
PROFERTY..
THE COUNTY CIJERI( AND RECORDERS OFFICE REQUIRES RETURN
ADDRESSES ON DOC{JI-|ENTS SENT FOR RECORDINGI I
PAGE 2
P-65
P. 66
ATJTA COMMITUENT
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exaeptlons)Our Order # v24385
rhe policy or poltclee to be Issued will contaln exceplfol? to the
iliif-."ing'unte'ss-[he same are disposed of to the satisfaction of
the Companyt
1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 prlnted on the cover sheet'
5. Taxea and assegstnents not yet due or payable and special
aEa6esnents not yet certlfled to the TreaEurar'6 orfrce'
7. eny unpaid taxes or aBsesstrents agalnst said land'
8. L,lens for unpaid water and seser charges, lf, any.
9. RIGHf OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HI$ ORE
TIIERETRoM sHourJD THE sAl,rE BE FouND-,id ppunrnarE oR rNTERsEcr rHE PR.EI{rsEs
As RESERVED IN UNITDD STATES PATENT RECORDED AUgUSt 16, 1909, IN BOOK {8 AT
PAGE 542.
10. RIGHT OF }TAY FOR DITCHES OR CAIIAIJS CONSTRUCfED BY THE AUTI{ORITY OF,THE-...
rrNrrED ETATEs As REsERvED rN uHitio iiares FATENT RECoRDED August 16, l9oe,
IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 542.
lL, RE5ERVAIXoN As To THE NoRTllt{EsT )"/4 oF SEcrXolt 12 TOI{N8HIP 5 souffi, RA}IGE
8t WESr oF TttE RIGHT oF WAy Of THit rrNItrED STATES, rTs PERI.IITTEE oR
LrcENgEa, To ENTER upoN, occuiy IND usE at{y PART oR AIJL or sArD r,AilD roR
EHE puRp6SEs nROvIDED IN THE ACT OF JttNE 10, 1920 (41 SAT. 1063) AS
RESERVED IN IHE PATEN:r RECORDED OCTOBER 2, 1946 IN BOOK 132 Af PAGE 405'
12. REsrRrctIvE covENANTS, t{HrcH DO NOT CONTATN A FORSETTURE OR REVERTER
crll{usE, BUr oMIITING RESTRICTIONE, rF NtY, BASED ON RACE, cgloR' R!!IgIO{.,-
oR NATroNAr, oRrGrN, As coNTATNED iN rNsrRimENT REcoRDED Aprll 04, 1978t lry
BooK 268 AT PAGE 598 AllD AS N,IENDED IN INSTRITMENT RECORDED Augugt 25, L987 |
IN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 447 THROUGH 472 ATID AS NERECORDED IN INSIRT'I'IEIIT
RECORDED $EPTEUBER 15, 19S7 It{ BOOK 469 AT PAGE 8Ol, A}ID AS AUENDED IN
TNSTRIIMENT RECORDED tltAY 2, 1990 IN BOOK 528 AT PAGE 154'
13. EASEI.{ENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRTCTIONS A8 SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED AI'IENDED PLAI OF GLEN LYON SUBDMSION'
14. TTFTEEI'I FOOT TITXLITT AITD DRAINAGE EASEI.TENT AIloNS THE I{EST IloT T.,INE OT
SUBJECT PRoPERTy AS SHOWN ON THE AIIENDED pLAT oF GLEN L,YON SUBDfVISION'
PAGE
.ApR-1a-e5 .TUE r7 =L2 ll" """ FARTHER9 slE 526 r464
." ApR-1a-es. TUE 17, t=drG BUG PARTHERS Sga =26 7464 o
L,AND TITLE GUARANTEE coMPAllY
DISCLOSURE StAltEldEt'IT
Required bY s€nate BiIl 91-14
A) The subject real property nay ba located ln a speclal taxing
diatrict.
B) A certiftcate of llaxea Due lleting each ta11n9- jurisdlction
ilat-il-;ttiineo fron the couniy TieaEurer or the county
Treasur€r's authorlzed agent.
c) The lnfor:nation regardlng epecial distrlctg-and the boundariea
of such distii"t" fiJi ue-oriarnla f,rom the Board of county
Couuissiot"rl,-if,. il,u"i, Efeiii-ina Recorder, or the County
AgEeEgor.
Required by Senate B11l 92-143
A) A certlf,icare of raxes Dua rlsting..each ta1119 ]yri1a.tg1lon ehall be obtalned fron the County-Treasurer or the County
Treaaurer's authorized aEent.
P. B?
I
1995-04-18 15r17 PAGE = 07
llsrwonru-Pewr'er Grorscglqrcan' It*c'
IulY 22,1994
Nancy and Charlie HoveY -'!-L^^;sitf* smitb & Frampton/vail Assocrarcs
Ann: Mr. George Larnb
230 Bridge Sueet
\rail, CO 81657
f"ffifi*s,coE16o1
Far 303 949{iL54
Phone 303 9a$7988
Job No. 194340
Subject:
rview for Lot 23' Glen Lyon' Vail' Colorado'
'Debris Flow l{azard Re
Gentlemen:
Asrequested,wehavemadeadebrisflowhazaxdreviewofttresubjectsite.Thepurpose
ofthereviewwastoevaluarcifcorsuuctiooonthelotcouldbeexposedtoapoteilial
debrisflowhazard.ourstudyconsistedofasitereconnaissanceonJuly15,lgg4aod
review of published regional trazards rnapping and topographic mapping'
Conclusions and Recomrtendations: This review has shown the following:
{. ' Lot ?3 !s exposed to a rnoderate debris flow hazard'
*Becauseofthepotentialconsequencesofadebrisflowtothestructuie.itis
recomrnendedthartheorvnerevaluatethefeasibilityofhazardmitigation.
+. Sile grtlirrg, flood proofing and direct protectiou of the building strouid be feasible
midgation cpiions'
+Themitigacionclesignsturliesshouldbedcrnervhenprelirni'nar;'buildirrglocadon
afli site grading congepts are available'
siteConditions:GlenLyonLot23coversaboutl/2acreandislocarerlonthenorth,
downfrill, side of Greenhill Court' The northern lot boundary froils on Westhaven Circlc'
Deveioprnentpluswerenotavailableatthetimeofthisstudy'Itisourunderstandingthat
accesstothebuildingwillbefronrthelowersideofthelotoffofWesthavenCircle.
Existiilgresitle;ncssirrelocatedonLotslsand22tothewestandonLots15and16uphill
torhcsr:uth,Yeget'nciorronthelotisatropenaspenforesiwithgrassunderstory'
NancY and Chartie HoveY
l:ulY 22,1994
Page2
Lot3sislocatedontheupperpartofanalluvialfanwhichcoversabout20acres.The
southernlotlineislocatedabout250feetdownslopefromrbefanapex.Theaverage
slope of the upper parr of the fart, in the vicinity of the lor' is about ]Qfo ' The alluvial fan
islargelytheproductofirrfrequentdebrisflowdeposilion.Thesedebrisflowsoriginated
in the steep &ainage basin on tbe $outh. They wue probably the result of urnrsually rapid
springsnowpackmeltingorunusuallyintensetlrunderstormprecipitation'Debrisflowsare
ahighdensitymix$reofwaEr,rockfragments,soilandotherdebris.Thedebrisflows
usually start as shallow iandslides in the colluvium below ttte steeper parts of the drainage
basin.Inadditiontotheoriginallarrdslidematerial,additionalmaterialcanbeincorporated
into the flows as a result of channel scour'
rlrusrd Assessrnenfi Regional debris flow hazard studies preparcd for the tr91y1 gf vail
indicatethatLot23isinamoderatehazardzoneMears,lgS4).Basedonoursilereview,
wewouldconcurwiththisclassification.Theregionalstudydescribesmoderatehazard
zoneasareassubjecttodebrisflowswhcretheimpactsarelessseverethaninahigh
hazardzone.Mitigationtechniquesareoftenpracticalinmoderatehazardzones,but
require site-sPecific'snrdies'
TheexisdngresidenceonLot15willtencltoblockfururedebrisflowsanddissipatethe
enelgy,butthisbuildingshouldnotbereliedontomtallyeliminatethepotentialhazard
toLot23.WerccommendthatdevelopmentonLot23includedebrisflowhazard
mitigation.Thefeasibiliryofbazardmidgationwilldependonthelocationandtypeof
srucnue planned, the proposed si$ grndtng, Bnd fuilher analy$i$ of potentinl debris flow
dyrrarnics'Indeveropingthissite,hazardmitigationconsiderationsshouldtakeprecedence
over other architectural and esthetics consideradons'
Ifdebrisflowdynamicmodelingshowsthatporcntialdebrisflowdepthandvelocitiesare
relativelylow,thenitshouldbefeasibletomitigatethehazardbysitegradingmeorodsarrd
floodproofinganddirectprotectionofthestnrcture.Thiscouldincludedesignirrgbuildtng
wallsexposedtodebrisflowstowitnstandimpact6ddepositionalpressures.Doors'
'' d u5:tl
de-/0-bE6r
NaocY and Charlie HoveY
IulY 22, 1994
Page 3
window, and otber smrcnrrally-weak wall areas will have to be located above the
anticipaedflowdepurofthedesigndebrisflow.sl.'gr"diogendbul'dlnglayoutdE0igrn
sbould elirninate *n"ur* ur*, o, building .it*""* which will prevent the free
flow of debris around the building'
Limitation:Thisreviewua,ue"nperformedinaccordanc'.:.:generallyaccepted
engineeringgeologicn'*'n"'andpracdcesinthisareaatthistime'Wemakenoother
warrantyeitherexpressedorimplied.rr'".o*ru,ionspresentedinthisletterarebased
onsitereconnaissance,reviewofnubtishedo.tu,unoourexperienceinthearea.The
report tus been prepared for the exclusive use il-lo, tritnt for preliminary site evaluation'
If you have questions or if we may be of funher assisnnce' please contact us'
ResPectfullY submitted'
HEPWORTH+AWLAK GEOTECHNICAL' INC'
/t n ! nnZ"tO f/ h, fu ,ftJ.
I
Rarph G. Mock Z7l' ffi Iq
Engineering Geologist
Rev bY: SLP
cc: Robert L' Arnold Arcbitect
Reference:
ebris FIow andDebris Avalanche Hulrd Analysis:
Mears, A.l', 1984' D
Town of Yail' Cslqraoo'
Prepued for the
H.P GEOTECHNICAL, INC
1840 rT. AON DRIVE
GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401
PHONE: (303) 27t{919
PROJECT MEMORANDUM
Date: March 30, 1995 JobNo 194340(1)
Proiect Debris Flow Hazard Mitigation, Lot23, Glen Lyon, Vail. Colorado
To: Mr. DavidPeel
From: Ralph G. Mock
Subjecfi Recommended Debris Flow Design Parameters for Direct Protection of Proposes
Residence
We have reviewed the preliminary development plans and site topography map submitted by your
office on lvfarch 9,1995. Based on the location and orientation of the proposed residence, we
have developed debris flow mitigation design criterion to be used in evaluating the feasibility of
reenforcing the building walls to resist impact and depositional pressures from potential debris
flows. Our findings are summarized below:
South Walls: The building walls on the south side of the residence are subject to the direct impact
of potential debris florm. These walls are also subject to static debris depositional pressures. The
two pressures are not additive and can be considered independently. For following design criteria
is recommended for the south facing walls:
Minimum Design Heighl <"r 4.5 ft
Dynamic Impact Pressureo) 600 psf
Static Depositional hessure (") 80 pcf equivalent fluid density
East Walls: The building walls on tle east side of the residence are subject to indirect impacts of
potential debris flows. These wall are also subject to static debris depositional pressures. The two
pressures are not additive and can be considered independently. The following design criteria is
recommended for the east facing walls:
MinimumDesignHeigrl<"r 3.5 ft
Dynamic Impact Pressure G) 200 psf
Satic Depositional Pressure (o) 80 pcf equivalent fluid density
Glen Lyon lot 23
March 30, 1995
Page 2
West Walls: The building walls on the west side of tle residence are not subject to direct or
indirect impacts of potential debris flows. These wall could, however be subject to static debris
depositional pressures. The following desigrr criteria is recommended for the west faciing walls:
MinimumDesiSnHeig6 t"r 3.0 ft
Dynamic Impact Pressure Not applicable
Static Depositional Pressure (o) 80 pcf equivalent fluid density
a- This is dre recommended minimum height of dre reenforced concrete wall above finished grade.
Approach slopes to the wall should b€ no steeper $8t the existing natural grado
b. - This pressure should be applied for the full lengttr ofthe wall to a height of3.5 feet above finished
grade.
c. - This pressure strculd be applied for the firll length oftho wall to a height of 3.0 feet aborre finished
grade using a riangular pressure distribution.
Other Design Considerations: It is important that site grading and building details do not create
topographic or structural area which could result in the damming and buildup of debris nest to
building walls. If it is necessary to have doors below the recommended minimum design heights it
may be possible to protect limited openings with walls independent of the main structure. The
ov*ner should be aware that direct protection ofthe residence will provide a reasonable degree of
safety for the building and its occupants, but will not prevent damage to landscaping as a result of
erosion and the deposition ofmud and debris on the property.
If there are questions, please contact us. We will prepare our final report after review ofthe
proposed development plans.
IJIST OF MATERfALS
NAI\,IE OF PROJECT: HOVEY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
LEGAT DESCRfPTION: LOT;23 BLOCK N/A SUBDIyTSION
STREET ADDRESS. 1339 Westhaven Circle
The following informat.ion is required for submitLar t.o the Design
Review Board before a final approval can be given:
A. BUIL,DING IIIATERIAIS:
Roof (Revised 6-7-95)
TYPE OF MATERIAI,
cel0tex rrPresidential shakert
series composition asphaltic
Stucco [a Habra X-855 Sunburst Sidinq
Other WaI1
Fascia (see
Soff i ts
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Stone River rock w/mortar joints.MaLeriaIs
attached sketch)
Buil-t-up cedar
2x8 and 2x10
Natural tone cedar..
0lympic semi-trans. 716
6rr T&G cedar 0Lympic serni-trans. 716
Clad
Custom col-or to natch
Devoe lM53E Frosty Flint
Door Trim
I'land or Deck Raits
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
ReLaining Walls
ExLerior i,ightinq
OEher
RoLLed stucco corners
and st,one sill . Maf,ch stucco and stone.
CusEom wood entry. Natural.
CLad French.Match Devoe 1M538 Frosty Fl-int
RolLed stucco corners. Match stucco.
(See attached sketch)
Decorative cedar. Olympic semi-trans 716
Metal ldatch adjacent materials.
MetaL Match adjacent materials.
Stucco [a Habra X-855 Sunburst
N/A
N/A
Concrete (stucco finish) La Habra X-855
Surface mounted. See attached photo.
Shutters and
window boxes.0lympic semi-trans. 716
Name of Designerr PEEL/LANGENWALTER ARCHITECTS' L.L.C.
Phone z 970-476-4506
B.LANDSCAPING:
tlla.--,.
Rec,e ,,16
.-],.,
G- t4 1_5
Reviewad' lc -k>'n€
gr:rv:rra<It v-z\ Rf
LAUREN WATERTON Return to
Town Planner
INTE R.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
lD\ 13 'C,r,rrr u'{oJ H"o-,l*val Crcr-ue
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
Tcrr{ -.C.t^w t116^ chtAt- \ *rz.\
upur i+ews 7 a\nanYe '
( \aw htr.," ac\AYtsstzl
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Tecer l4Astirxe Date: Xr-:oa 2o'rq$
. Ne n@d o 4t gon ot \b(. end of tte A6.re \o c-oVfr dror ruqe {rocn o Pn\rA\e c€5 \d6a.u 6\ Yo
i-O** SyQb . 1n.lr-t cr trrre Fh gndd be 2't. E\oJcrr I c.\Jon t\e, e(rrd\.e Side S,c^rrd trla'tQr
ty€,srrceL €N roYEn ft.clo r1Yl4(\* )
. -I( {oor togo( '.ra$ ts hl:Fr€r |vEn tt€ g<ogo0€A fing'ulor\ c'9Qh6\L ' h!6 orea v$\ ba d[r$Qtr:\t to
Xt]"qr id.'. ,*try' 1oo co'rrt e"* t"t !no^r'r of € '
<J\-r Lry\! rtsrc. s^r\tr\ ercir\e€f, cqs qrk'r<€ ott"l.pt'"1 t t$t'ic\ \e lst€
H,Si$*HXR SlI" SiS; fi." i;:'* s.'l.g".,a$$*
oe* d-\\p G boq gkceei \5 ucrsaFe ' to "io-'i rt'*'€oc'' Qccl rde' at tG9SD-'-l
l?il?t;;*'a ;;;ii;;"'i'fri'"arcbe..'c-ccrncActed cn s.*e ' s@e-. '
NoI APfflu€r. Resugmtf'
.ei.J llEntl2
o O &u-re72-
atzr t a tru d.El
Lot v3, Glp,LW Retum to I,AIIREN WATBRTON
Town Planner
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE OF PUBUC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
l
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
l.frr,..r at\V. fa*iL1 rh qur.. ?9"-
Fevialed b[r:-[e-t*i V1o.irty,Date: Srrel tqs
Comments:
llo TodinttueFf [s12'.1_15a116r.r.red' 5d' Fort'
-n*tt Gr5r$"rs vr%e7'
i"* 6]'t*,".<j caqu '<er<ralt <rd ?
Oor.o(y ,n tio b.ouo* keH$e Nidllo W 6v$1 aveo( '
?un \ads ro rnr-\udo G (st€ cequrnt l\€' ccnfrollL( ko f€gsrabtr5vr YYv Atat.r$ in lke
t**sE,.We6ttuven rrqtlr of wa{. bo fh€ Pr€,@xr5hn\ cav.lttrm .
,rad ltte
rt
o
!
o
RetUm tO Lauren Waterton
Town Planner
PROJECT:rc
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
RIEF DESC
TVaec
RIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
!Y,!^f 't ^ tnas respt-n*Ll ! f* Loa.nu*{,a n(_tU HC t: Kl,rtztt^*aau a kvr<^_0 D.ZB or^ Uk[,,uAa]1, I U,Jr(/
t;",o y:^" )y'.'Y Y Pto'"'t d7" tt'- l;d.. I b ,rz"ri"e'
f,rrrc^-t Fra dr1t- rr-py'ra'rl . 'yfto- +- 5,uta,-X"tpi1-;; ";';
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:--Z/'d &tr3'-Date: a 7 9s
Comments:
\ ^'/
'tz at C "
.*t
J't"'4'z-z-'z
.4 c cciS t . ,r|."o-u ,/l.n t? /,€z g/z(
./2zaFL-za .<l' t'La s .rr.z)1 ,4/<o.1-/
"./''n ,y'*
)Vza1 9PF2'i:2'<t
: r'/ ''Z /f
^:'.tzzz tt'l'-./, ' Lz'| Vt'az'i
t 77'7c"1' t/Lz'xy'
';/,-t'
,r'/..t,a..t' / S rZafl.a"'e'-'e/
rii.J I llYgl
v
o
rt
o
Lor ZV, Qlen L,4ot4 '\)
FletUrn tO Lauren I{aEerton
Town Planner
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT:
OATE SUBMITTEO:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PBOPOSAL:{W qqv k^'".^y '/^ GVw W
Beviewed by:A+€Nc(v Date:- S-t -15
comments: r;,n+btrt l-po,^he*S o,tr f14
{.v.- D.p* Aa-esJ
<^rn-h w,\t^r',^- lbo' oF At\
gls.,c-ft"^f {.o-* o-^
g<Itri'r ,
Ag g,'.,'o tJ
e-D S-pr^\e\r,r S...*\^r*F,
Noney Meyen Hovey
Zeno Woodhotm Rood
Momches{!en-by-the-Seon MA @L944-L@4@
5@8-526-V464
April27, 1995
To: THE TOWN OF VAIL
I acknowledge that my proposed construction project is located in a geologically
sensitive area and a moderate debris flow hazard zone. I am aware of the studies
done by the Town of Vail indicating these hazards.
The State of Massachusetts
Essex County
/t -'/
Before ^", &..-&^/-(- in and for said county and state , on this day,
personally appeared NANCY MEYER HOVEY known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she
executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expresses
Given under my hand and sdal of ottice, this ?d, dav of April, 1995,
My Commission Expires:
cRAcE A, l'r^l,t:
---]\cffi-niEEfc-
ilv'Ciilr^ll:SlCl'l EXI)llff S[P'|. !. yi1
I
Nancy Meybr Hovey
,ntrPw-L,,
-'
tlrrwonrH-Plwr.c,x Gr.rR**qrcAL, INc.
l1?r"*1.::rr.r"r$,coEr6ol
April28, lee5 Xil:l'r;l';li},,,
Mr. and Mrs. Charlcs Hovcy
c/o David Mark Feel, Ar$lritect
P.O, Box 1202
2588 Arosa Drive
Vail, Colorado 81658
Attention: Mr. David Mark Peel
ohNo. 194 340(i)
Subjcct: Debris Florv Mitigation Haeard Study for the l{ovcy Rosidence, Lot 23
Glen Lyott, Vail, Colorado
Deir Mr. and Mrs. I{ovcy:
As requested wc havu cor:ducted a tlebris flow hazard ntitigation study for your proposed
residence , The work was prcformed in accordauce with our Miuch 10. 1995 proposal to
you. 'I'his letLer h$-s been prepared to present our conclusions and recomn:errded
mitigation desi gn criteria,
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed building site cr:uld be subjcct to infrequent debris florvs during periods of
unusually rapid suorv melt or unusually intense thunder storm precipitation. 'fhe
likelihood that a debris {low rvill actually occur during a reasonable service lifc for the
rcsidences is considered to bs low, Because ofthis, direst protection ofthe residence by
reinforcing builcling walls exposed to debriri flow impact and deposition pressures appe4r$
reasonoble. It is our undcrslanding that you arc a\\'are thut direct proteclion sirould
provide a. rcasonable degee of safety for the huilding and its occupants, but rvill not
prcvcnt damage to landscaping as a result of erosion and the deposition of tnud and debris
on the property.
For mitigation design we recomntend that a debris llorv with a i'luid densiry of about I26
pcf, maximum depth of trbout 3.5 feot, ard moving at a velocity of about 12 fps be
considered at the building site. Reconunendations for direct proteatian ofthe building by
designing the building rvalls or walls independent of the building to rcsist debris flow
impact and depositional pressurcs are presented in the ne:r:t section.
We havc reviewed thc proposed April 24, 1995 direct protection mitigation plau for thc
rcsidcnce prepared by David lvlurk l,ecl, Architect. The locations and heiglrts o1'the
proposed debris flow nritigation walls appear to bc consistent with our recor:rmendations.
The capacity of walls to resist the reponrmcnded inrpact and depositiorral pressures
should be determined by a structural engineer. The proposed debris flow mitigation tbr
Lot 23 should not incrcase the potential hazard to other propeffes in the arca.
Hepuor;thPaulak
.Geotech
TEL:505-945-8454 Mag 08 95 14:57 No .005 P,O5
April28, 1995
Mr. and Mrs, Charles Hovcv
Page 2
MINGATION DESION RECOMMENDATIONS
The following debris flow mitigetion resornmendations were presented in our March 30,
1995 Project Menorandum and have not been modified.
South Walls: The building walls on the south side of the residencc arc subject to high
impact augles of potential debris flows. These walls arc also subject to static debris
depositionhl prcssures. Thc two prcssures urs not additive and can be considered
independently. The following design criteria are recomtnended for the south facing
walls:
Minimum Design l{eight Gr 4,5 ft
Dynamic Impact Pressue(b) 600 psf
Static Depositional Pressure(c) 80 pcf equivalent f'luid density
Enst Walls: The building walls on the east side of the residence are subject to low impact
angles of potcntial debris llows. These wall are aiso .subject to static dcbris depositionai
pressures. Tlre two prcssrues iue not additive and can be considered independently. Ttre
following design criteria ar€ rocornmcnded for the eost facing wtlls;
Minimum Design Heightt.r 3.5 ft
Dynamic Impact Pressure (b) 200 psf
Static Depositional Pressure(.) 80 pcl'equivalent fluid dcnsiry
West Wullsl Thc building walls ort the west side of the residence ar€ not subject to direct
or indirect impacts of potential debris tlows. These wall could, however be subjecr to
static debris depositional prcssures. The following design criteria are rccomrlended for
the west facing walls:
Minimum Design Heiglrt tn) 3.0 ft
Dynarnic Impaot Pressrue Not appiicable
Satic Depositional Pressure (.) B0 pcf equivalent fluid density
a.- This is the recommendcd minimum height of rbo reinforced concrete wall above
finished grnde, Approsch slopes to dre wall should be no steeper thun the existbg narurol 'grade,
b. - Tbis pressurc should be applied for tho full length of rhe wall to a height of 3.5 feer
above linished grade.
H.P GEoTECH
-..-.i.*S
Hepuor,thPaul ak - Geotech T
Steven L. Pawlok,
RGlvl/rgm/ro
03-945-8454 l"1a u
April 28, 1995
Mr. and Mrs. Charles Hovey
Page 3
. c. - This pressure should bc apptied for the full length ofrhe wall to a height of!,0 fcer '. abovo finished grade using a triangular prossure distriburiou.
LIMITA'ilONS
This study has been conducted according to generally acccpted geotechnical engineering
principles and practices in this arca at this time. We make no odrer waranty either
expressed or implicd. Thc conclusions and recorilnendations submitted in this letter arc
bascd on field observations, numericul rnodeiing, the proposed construation, and our
judgement' This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design
pu{poses, Significant design changes may require addition analysis and nrodifications ro
the rccomrnendations prescnted in this rcpon.
If there are questions rcgarding tiris letter, pleuse coDract us.
Respectfully submitted,
HEPWORTI{ . PAWLAK OEOTECHNICAL. INC.
EL :3
o
08
o
95 14:37 N0.005 P.tl4
(m"!tu''-a
Engincering Geolqgist
Reviewed by:
#)lfq?%
ffif3,ffi
H.P GEoTECH
..jl&nr;rtldl