HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC120027 1983 PEC minutes combining lots 25 & 26Bill,
Please find attached the 1983 PEC approval for the vacation of the lot lines between Units 25 & 26. Was the associated plat ever executed?
Thanks,
Bill
From: Bill Gibson
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:28 PM
To: 'William F. Pierce'
Subject: RE: PEC120027 - Upton garage
Thanks Bill,
To be clear, it is my understanding that your client is only requesting setback variances for this proposal.
Questions: Is there currently a home owner’s associations for Bighorn Terrace? I don’t believe one existed in the past, but we didn’t know if circumstances have changed.
Question: Who has rights to the affected parking easement? If the rights to that easement extend to more than the owners of Lots 25 and 26, written joint-property owner approval must
be submitted from those affected. The submitted variance application and anticipated design review applications can no be processed without such an approval if applicable.
Question: Were lots 25 and 26 formally re-subdivided into a single lot at some time in the past or are lots 25 and 26 currently two separate parcels? If 25 and 26 are separate lots,
the proposed development statics must be revised to address the two lots separately. If lots 25 and 26 are separate and the owner wishes to combine them, an Exemption Plat application
must be submitted for PEC review.
http://www.vailgov.com/docs/dl_forms/PEC_Exemption__Plat_031512.pdf
Question: Would your client be willing to amend their application to reduce the size of the proposed garage to 300 sq. ft. or less? In Staff’s opinion, a garage of 300 sq. ft. or less
is more consistent with the variance review criteria of Section 12-17-6, Vail Town Code, than the proposed 375 sq. ft. garage based upon past PEC variance approvals and the 300 sq. ft.
GRFA deduction associated with garages for other two-family residences. Specifically:
“2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.”
Sincerely,
Bill
From: William F. Pierce [mailto:bill@vailarchitects.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 7:53 AM
To: Bill Gibson
Subject: RE: PEC120027 - Upton garage
Bill, Sorry about that. The attached Narrative and Development Standards are updated (7/20/12)
Best Regards, Bill
<http://www.vailarchitects.com>
________________________________
From: Bill Gibson [mailto:BGibson@vailgov.com]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:19 PM
To: William F. Pierce
Subject: PEC120027 - Upton garage
Bill,
The Community Development Department has received a variance application for the construction of a garage at 4192 Columbine Way; however, the application and associated narrative do
not identify what variance or variances are being requesting. Pursuant to Section 12-17-2, Application Information Required, Vail Town Code, a variance application must include (in
part):
“C. A statement of the precise nature of the variance requested, the regulation involved, and the practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of this title that would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation.”
Please submit a revised application narrative clarifying the variance(s) being requested at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly
by email or at (970) 479-2173.
Sincerely,
Bill
Bill Gibson, AICP
Town Planner
Community Development
970.479.2173
970.479-2452 fax
vailgov.com
twitter.com/vailgov