Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PEC070019, 0020, 0021, 0022 Work Session Memorandums May - August 2007
MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 14, 2007 SUBJECT: A request for a work session to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regards thereto. (PEC07 -0019, 0020, 0021, 0022) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC Planner: Warren Campbell DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC, has requesting a public hearing with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West. The applicant and staff would like to: Introduce the Team working on Ever Vail • VRDC • Callison Architecture • Alpine Engineering • Mauriello Planning Group • Other Consultants Presentation by Callison Architects • Background and experience • Examples of other work • Vision for Ever Vail • Village Concept • LEEDs building design • Existing Conditions /Proposed Frontage Road realignment • Givens regarding Ever Vail • Compliance with Lionshead Mixed Use Zoning • Compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan • • Compliance with employee housing regulations • • Frontage Road realignment • Incorporation of a ski lift • Incorporation of a public /private parking structure for the ski lift • Incorporation of Red Sandstone Creek as an amenity /feature in the development • Market research performed to -date • Process and Applications • What has been submitted • What will be submitted • Next steps • Topics to cover at future meetings • Project education • Market/retail analysis • Review of major subdivision • CDOT process for Frontage Road realignment • LEEDs building design impacts • Rezoning of the properties • Review of possible text amendments to Lionshead Mixed use zoning to allow for office on the first floor and possible other changes • Review of Conditional Use Permits for the ski lift and parking • Review of Major Exterior Alteration applications ® The Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission is being asked to listen to the presentation and provide any feedback that is appropriate at this time. • Is there any initial input the Commission would like to provide? • Are there any requests for information that may be atypical to the standard review process that the Commission believes is needed to review the applications associated with Ever Vail? • Are there any items of concern for the Commission that should be addressed moving forward? The development of Ever Vail will have multiple applications associated with the process of moving forward through the entitlements. The approval from CDOT to realign the Frontage Road is the lynch pin in the development of Ever Vail. The process with CDOT has begun and formal applications will be submitted in the near future. As we move forward many applications will need to be reviewed with the assumption that CDOT will approve the Frontage Road realignment. Just like with the Front Door applications, which hinged upon the land exchange with the Forest Service, Ever Vail, will be moving forward while CDOT is reviewing the application for the Frontage Road realignment. • 2 • II. BACKGROUND On December 11, 2006, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendments by a vote of 4 -1 -0 (Jewitt opposed). The initial concepts include, the addition of a skier gondola in the location of the old gas station site, the development of mixed use areas, including housing, retail, and office spaces, to create a new portal to the mountain with all the typical skier services, and the possible relocation of the South Frontage Road. On January 2, 2007, the Town Council directed staff to remove Tract K and the other parcels proposed for inclusion within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan by the Town staff from the proposed text amendments. In addition, at this hearing direction was given to staff and Vail Resorts regarding employee housing, traffic generation and mitigation, and a transit center. On February 6, 2007, the Town Council by a vote f 5 -1 -0 (Foley opposed) approved Resolution No. 4, Series of 2007, which adopted the amendments to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan for the area known as "West Lionshead". III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission tables this application to the June 11, 2007, public hearing. IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Existing Ever Vail Conditions B. New Frontage Road Alignment C. Public Notice is 4-j ` "` '� � \ ` \ ` � ;1,11'• \`\ / � c 1 N \ � ` 4d Oa 1 O ar. 0 1 0 W�� 1 0 C �1 b 0 Al 1\ 1 , �11 \, 1 - - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - - - 1 ( ` O p➢ I iY I t To}�N of PAIL THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on May 14, 2007, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning from Two - Family Primary/Secondary District (P /S) to Low Density Multiple Family District (LDMF), located at 1817 Meadow Ridge Road /Lot 21, Buffehr Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07 -0018) Applicant: Capstone Townhome Association, represented by Marc Levarn, President of the H.O.A. Planner: Warren Campbell A request for a work session to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail' (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regards thereto. (PEC07 -0019, 0020, 0021, 0022) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC Planner: Warren Campbell A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to amend the allowable Gross Residential Floor Area, located at 3977 Lupine Drive /Lot 1A, Block 1, Bighorn 1St Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07 -0023) Applicant: Todd and Cindy Oliver, represented by TAB Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification to shared property boundaries, located at 5119 and 5121 Black Bear Lane /Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07- 0024) Applicant: Lisa Augustine, represented by JMP Architects Planner: Bill Gibson • Attachment C , &4_ 4 y( o01 V�r Page 1 • OL v( • • �r �- A Poo PO Y .>a i ;� 4- W E O Q _r_ -4--a 0 ■ Co ma) O U > -�-� . _ a) c� �o 4 a) O _0 C: a� c� 0 a) ca C: C: � O _ 0 U) N M o L. i N O O (1) •- L L O O O -- � -0 42 0 O O Cn c10 - 0 4--j -4--j a — O O > O O U - i o 4-0 4-0 4--1 O }. (D c O O E Q0u- cO < I i i • C/) (n (1) U O ^ L LL c 0 c� U . Q a 4-0 E O cn N L U LU o U) o a� O . - E 0 C: C: cm O C� co cm O O CM m m c .C: O O o cn Z) D � U c� cn i Cz C� 0 - 0 C - C: C: c O O O Co O • • C: • - • - �- • -� CCU _ � � � 4-j Q Q O O O .— � CL U U cn CL I I I I CC3 • C • C/) a� U O 0 L Q Q Q U a) :3 cr a) CL a) A --+ C) -f--j X N Z • cm O N O I..L 4--- O O � L � �o o� c� U O � U Q � O O � � O � N U W cu U X N cu 0 U O O • U L � U O U U O 3 0 0 �—U • • LJ O 00 � X co O o L O c� 0•� Q LL O t'1 cm O N O I..L 4--- O O � L � �o o� c� U O � U Q � O O � � O � N U W cu U X N cu 0 U O O • U L � U O U U O 3 0 0 �—U • • LJ • ^ 1 W L L U r 4-0 V J � L C� aD U D O C x cL .O w a) �--+ Cn � O � O m a) U 2t. • z I I K•� O O C� 0 (1) D ca . O O W 0 c: 4-0 O U U }' L U O - ca L 0 0 U) '> O zo O U ' a QL Q �C N U U, a, w a U 0- O o� L N U E- L � � O L c Q _ '> - O � O K•� O O C� 0 (1) D ca . O O W 0 c: 4-0 O U U }' L U O - ca L 0 0 U) '> O zo O U ' a QL Q O _O 4- -6- U) C/) C: 4- O 4-j LL 0 • - W U � � to E p M 0, L. C: O a) - A--+ O ca O 4) Co }, O = -4-1 X _ p U Q •— C� 4-0 - W � � W - O p + O O � X 0 C� � O cn U � I I O I I '— � • L U 0 C/) U) U O ^ L LL c .� � L � a {� 3 Q V � O C i r Y O a �• U U o � u s n u M Y ' e D � 2 9 W w c U O y a ` O CL U r t p q L 11 y y o � a r � J Y p c. s U 4 i 40 LU I w • o*- O O po� Cn C: O ZZ U t7 • O N ry 4- O N N *I- L1! i O G Ca X � 0 o*- O O po� Cn C: O ZZ U t7 • O N ry 4- O N N *I- L1! U c r1 u co U) . co C Q _0 C N D ry ` W _(o C L X 73 W U C 0 0 0 0 c N LU O C O 4► J� c Q . c W d a_ n 0 0 N N C 3 C4 N CJU vw0 c U a W L C = C � w m W Q � L V N cu C = O E O = m L C/ ) � r'1 C ^ N E 0 O O E O nl W L iA ' V^^J .Ln `� N Y/ r ^�' C Q U O N U O = !C C L N >+ O, �— (D > 0 C 5, L N Cl) U r_ cu O L � ca 2 c ~ ca m ; , 0) 4-0 O L1 L C (n U Q = _� N / / m x > m X LU � Q / ) :3 _ U a) N d N p O A A A Q . c W d a_ n 0 0 N N C 3 C4 N C C L O -F-r 0 E^ 3� Q W ' N m . R 9 W co I ti r n r O Z 9 W W a) cu > W o a� 0 c . _ T ' — �, a� 0 cn O O O U O O a) Lo L O N (� O C/) p 0 (1) C O T N _ (Do O)N Cfl N � c (� (6 0 O O Q N c C:) to Q 6q L L O L X L L E N � >+ • > �N > O O C:) Ln � O N � M In O 3 O O N > 0) (a �O O C)) > L- N L 3 N L � L O O C � (/) Q O cu ^' W > O N + + + r N >, (1) O (1) Q N p (1) Q 4) Q > m > N > X > a) > X > X a) Q -0 < (D < a) A O A C: A N A A QO A QO E^ 3� Q W ' N m . R 9 W co I ti r n r O Z 9 W W a) cu > o a� c > L a� � } ' cn O O O a) Lo T N O C/) p 0 (1) C O O N _ (Do O)N O N � c (� (6 0 O O Q N c C:) O ,- N O E N � >+ • > �N > O O C:) Ln � O N � M In O 3 O O N > N O� �O O > > N N N 3 N �, p� N O O O � O cu O N + + + r 0O C > p �-0 O N > , N N N M = U U U O 4-1 C: oo N N > QO Q QO I 0 U > N 0 00 U) N � � . L rn cu N > ca 00 > ti U cn GA' A A A A A A A A E^ 3� Q W ' N m . R 9 W co I ti r n r O Z 9 W C L r r 0 N C`7 O O N O ^ —+ W O ^ L I..L L O L U) 2 A c Q m Lm 0 z �a W 4aw c U) c O J CO O O N O O N V) -1--j r1 . U O ry X H ca 4— O c O :4--j . L m O LL c .o r\ 0 I I N N b9 I I a W d ti 0 N d C N Q Lit W . ( 1 3 70 ^� W � /1 O VJ -f-.+ Q U ' ^ ry X ^ W U) O O N 4- O c O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 E1} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 «° ° U) M M N N V V ER d). EA 40 EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 LO EJ9� ti co to 0 L r U J F 0 M L O O > LL M W as a� �L O o 0 - - m L (1) • O VJ L n V , J W -Fo V im ! (1) A'[ L 4 > m O O LL c� 0�1 CD 0 0 N Oq L L ` V O cu C C X M .iL Q W L Q L C cu LL G c cu U � a) � O Z O CL a) U) Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O LO O LO O Un O Un O LO O LO to m N 0 0 — — m " N A � O_ J T O O . Q O U O O N I r O O N I LO O 0 N c� N c 0 J 0 0 N M O O N N O O N • • 9 : O T S O 1 c .= N Q O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v� N O O 1 O MO B O O O O LO O to L LO O V) O LO O LO O o II N 1 ti N a O ti LO N M N C N N � 1 r T 4 04 d4 p �S 6F} ff} I dq d4 Ef? YA EA 6q N O 0 __ M i N � I U I � I � I � I co L N m 06 O 0 I C O I � J I I LO O 0 N c� N c 0 J 0 0 N M O O N N O O N I � Gj Q W • O T O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO O to O LO O V) O LO O LO O LO N O ti LO N O ti LO N M N N N N � 1 r T 04 d4 6F} ff} Ef? dq d4 Ef? YA EA 6q O 0 __ M i N I � Gj Q W C 4— O O F L .. O O7 N m U m c O 4-a N 0 X m F U) ( O N i LO O O N LJ - 0 �o 0 LL 1 QD O M T'-- v 0 N � -0- e, N � Q N • • 0 ._ co J Uc L a5 �I m o Q LO Q Q L O o _1 (a O Q. LO Son 0 Q) 0 O co U co N O N N a Q U o .c � U O Q � CL z �� ° ��c Q c w Q N U 3 NN� \ W W .� O L . O w O 0 0 0 0 '01 0 00 M O O LO N O T r r_ O �+ 00 0D 00 CO Lf) N (C) I` O M N l[) c`> O o � N M O M 0 O N N O Cfl F- O > r- 0 N �O o O 0 O �- 0 d In M — q N O O f� r 0) d N (r j r O CO CO U C N O j CD N -0 N u O M 0 0 O O CD O N O p U O M — - O O U N ti O � — N Q O L-o (N i � m O O N LO r , O O O N N N N 3 >' a� N > O - L N O W_0 O (U L N vi - o Q O L. (D V a� i N C N E - 0 O d T- 70 a W (� U �L 4J �02 L Q >u) c� A .� O L . O w O 0 0 0 0 '01 0 00 M O O LO N O T r r_ O �+ 00 0D 00 CO Lf) N (C) I` O M N l[) c`> O M � N N N Cfl 00 O > r- N �O o O 0 O �- 0 d In 0 LO 0 T- N 0 O O C O O � N .N i L) N m d L 1 O 'T � 00 M CO 00 M � N CN r- co CO I" — qq � CNI M 'j' 0 0 T- ( 2) O 0 C 0) Cy) (1) +- cu C p L T C C a� O Li- L Q r =3 Q W N O }' 0) -1- (6 0 U C N j CD -0 Y to p U O (u U Q O U N LL — N Q Q N � m (t3 " E (6 00 N (U >' N > O - N N O W_0 O (U L N vi - o Q V 70 i N C ' - 0 O c> W (� Q �L 4J L Q A O ^ O cn > O N 0 0 W Q L 0) W m 2 W W N m Q 4 9 Ilk r =3 Q W (n W L ^ W ^ �.L X W . W W cu Q� Q m Q ^, i 0 L cm U E O 0- � (n U L 0 w x W x () W L a C r O a C C d Q. L \ 0 m U) W ' L ' W � � � � Q � � U E N U W O •� O a) E W E N Q N A C. U L a) 2- ^ W Y L W O L LL Q N N � •� �1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO pj f� 07 ti O O N O N V) r� CO I` - � - w M 0 0 0,t w W w d' CC) (C) M 1- O W CC) W O M M Un O Uf) In N N N CO CO ti M 6 60. to Efl H/? EA 69.1 a) A i W C O A �1 P� � L � , O O O 0 L M 0 �i M O Q N O T- C E C L 'T O N Q Q X.0 O N O C (n O E O L CL 0 4- +. O m a (n (n W C O L L > (6 0 r, pp LO (C) 0 o (n E L ) 0 U U o Ow o ■ . a) O M - Fu O O O E � CO) C +' O) 0) O ++ O (v M Y m � M Of 0 o a 0 E O C C O J M =0 0 LL LL U) Z Q a) A i W C O A �1 m c y LL 4� L O = Q x L W a. C O a C d CL cn Q. F - L. L O ` 4� m o o 0 0 O O O ti 0 r- O O M M O r O P� � L � , O O O m X 0 M 0 �i M O Q N O T- C E C ' O 'T O N Q Q X.0 O N O C (n O E O L CL 0 4- +. O m a (n (n W C O L L L > a) 0 N r, pp LO (C) O (n (n E L ) 0 U U o Ow o ■ . ■ m c y LL 4� L O = Q x L W a. C O a C d CL cn Q. F - L. L O ` 4� m o o 0 0 O O O ti 0 r- O O M M O r O P� � M � , M O O O- M M O O M O q' N O T- C6 d UC) 'T O N N ,' LC) 00 l O r f- O M ti N r, pp LO (C) O (C) O O to N N M N O M - Fu O O O E � CO) = 1 Q W O r d V a ti O O N d C 7 b N L C C > (0 0 0 a) - Fu O O O E N C +' O) 0) O ++ +, (v M Y o a 0 C C M 0 U- LL () Z Q = 1 Q W O r d V a ti O O N d C 7 b N C 7 I� L.. E 0 cn U i (u 0 r !b, M W W 0 U- 4-0 L LLI m E W 76 C _O C � L � N C i '— O *-j LL G) z 7 a) E O ` -C o - a c c0 c 0 a� 0 �-C c ca cu CO /y m o LL o L r O O U- LL a a� m C O O LL rr�^ vJ O O L O W1 u c 0 0 m c r- c .E O U z I. O i C c C 3 O o N t� O 00 bs 11 N F� O O7 C � o C O L LL O � 10` _o M M LO 11 m F� � E N C O U- c c W m -4--j O LL cr U) Q. Q U) A A -\ to O c - a O C E O s L) N i N O O O CD G O W O O C LL1 4) i0. L- L- LL a E A O w v rn cn Nt O c (� N U O (. aD f` �+ N CO M O �- L L O CM N U co r - V) d "- (ca a O LL o m M cn N O N N O a� � O 0) O CT > c N ^ _0 N O N CD cu N W W O O O CD :3 0- - a N O o O � cu r N ■ O O7 N O :3 O O "_ L cu (, cn N W N cn a) O M O N— Y Q— CL • O N } ' U N � U (n .- N A A -\ to O c - a O C E O s L) N i N O O O CD G O W O O C LL1 4) i0. L- L- LL a E A O w v rn V- Nt cu O (. aD f` �+ N CO M N L c m O (n O co r - V) d "- (ca a O LL o m M cn N O N N O O � O 0) O CT :3 :3 ^ _0 ^` O N W W In U O CD O o Q ■ ■ ■ LL A a� w rn V- Nt cu m (. U f` �+ N CO N L N cn 0 N O co r - V) d U- (ca a O LL o m M cn N J H O H U- O � O � O N N In O O o Q Q. LL LL (, cn N , a ^ V/ • L O O 1 i _ (0 M • _ if M • _ Of 0) O M • CL 00 L a w ' w a� CL a H a�i H _ m • a Of — Q Of F 0 O L o LO O ILO O LO b 00 00 O � N O O O ti 00 LO CO 00 N 00 00 ti 00 LO �60!)- 6113� w rn V- Nt cu — f` Q) N CO N L N M r N r - LO O ILO O LO b 00 00 O � N O O O ti 00 LO CO 00 N 00 00 ti 00 LO �60!)- 6113� Q w w rn cu — W N N m orf ai Q� (ca a O LL o m M cn 7 a� o o J H O H Q w 1] c k A A A A c A L U C Q � o O c o - U E N O > to a) —_ O ^ ) m E 0 0 cu CO O "� O O ti to LO T cn r— O In a) O cu II a) o tII cn O .2 c) L > L- N O 0) C. a) C O v' W N cn U L 6 a) i c6 O C) N O L 60 O O > O 0 0 C) > O O o C 0 .� 0 U C > L O O N E Q O 6 I- a) 69 A O A � L- C O C � O O O O — a) Q a) C a) cn a) C O C a) LO �? U N (n m O L N M a) U 0 co O a. 4— O o Y N E �� m O L N Y O > a) O > Q Q L j N cu c6 > _ E N p Lo I` �✓ L Q m a) O 2 W E O C _ _ O) Q k A A A A c A L U C � o � o - U E N O > to a) —_ C ^ ) m E 0 0 cu a O "� O O to LO T cn O O In a) O cu II a) o tII cn O .2 c) +-- L- N O 0) C. a) C O v' N cn U Q 6 a) i c6 O C) N O L 60 O O > O 0 0 C) > O O o C 0 .� 0 U C CO -r-- L O O N E Q O 6 I- a) 69 A A A C cu ^ o a C a) Y LO ca C N C In a) cu II 3 (Q Q 01 N cn cu U } O C J > >+ 0 :3 O Z c m o O O a) O C N O O_ — N _ cn a) 06 c"n a �? U N (n m O O m \J a) o o L o O W m U v' u ' > > Q ,n ++ i Q) O O p � N +� U C L ca CU `i (n � _ !!�^ v/ Q) C/) a) 0 E _O C N � O n O cu 0 C X 0 "O U CU a :3 o 0 O CO Q O C X O U D N \ \ O Qx �� �� .�� Lo (D =3 Q o U) H U O3: co , o A A A G\ A A c co -+--+ ^^ n L L J _r__ V J c� � W E 0 cn U LL . cu W L 1 O C O � 1 U m U O C > X 0 O c� Nom ^ > 0 T-- 0 0 a) C U (D 0) ° > O � � CY) () T-- O a) W o C (D C N �' L a) to O C a) N = M _ u- cn o -0 a) �� >, O o a) . a) C m U— cn C O }' :3 N C o > \ O (B Q .(n (0 N C Q N () U a) M 4- O _0 C cm O s C O C = (U a) 0 a) C > a) o +J � a) N E -0 (B + L W C w O C E O Z3 :3 a) cu O a) N U ) (n N 0- O a) O Q? U a) E N C C N-0 OU �' , (� i C O E a)� U CL O O �- O a) X C }' N L to co (A Q) O ' C �' m N— a) M � (n O Q E Q Q L �' O o� (A a) E O }, (n N C N U- Q N � Q-C Lo O U ■ ■ L 1 O ° O > m U O C > X LL O c� Nom ^ tm a) A C 4 N ° > O � mm� �� C m� C j > O o m:U > m -0 C O ° C ° �6 = M �V- cn o -cn 00 �� O o a) . a) ■ ■ U— cn C A O C O U N C E C O C W G1 L cu O O C C Y ' O O cn a) a) Q U v d V a r` 0 0 N N C 7 7 N N w � W O tm 1i W 0 O CL ._ CD O h a LL v d V a r` 0 0 N N C 7 7 N N c c 3 CL �C) c X G V/ U L 3 S r Q W W r d ZE 0 0 N d C 7 N CID L ` N o � '� ?+ E O Al W L O W V - Q1 � c L r r U U O 4 O O C O O N O V - cu O C/) N 'C O ca U U L O c p v 's p • N cn U U -0 cu CD 1� L a c co O m °- E Uo� N C ca _ .., � c O *' -� — 'v� a� •o a� 3 B O O U> L O d p v CL (D W x L (� c C/) _ Q N Q U IL ^, ` Cl) E Q Q ,CU U O U - to N :3 cn cA . C O O -0 Q Cl) U O Q _ a N O C N L �; O cf) N o 0 O O a O N O N cia O < O o o. N cu O � L a ^ Yi cn cI) c / W CIO cc N C C O N N U t 01 J i L N (D N o U ) y cv Cl) A A A A 3 3 S r Q W W r d ZE 0 0 N d C 7 N c L Cr O . (n n O a- ^ ^ t1 W V X U L O a c w U ^ � W C c� C O L N N LL cn O s U) 0 �o d FY 0 0 N N C 3 N N cn (n L i� N 1--, cn N -C cl U Z (n v a) C in C (n 06 0) C > O 01 fn O � Q `. a i U) N U U O :3 C ? 2 Y 3 O } Q N U _ N N F— N N ( f c cn c Q U O O N (� (� N m C Y C CD U N N - ca E (n i (D N C � C m C - m cv J O 0 0 Q m i cn O 3 O "a N m ui j :3 -0 N N (� C L (D U) C m "O cn N C C X W N N 0) C U co L O Q (a N C � N LL Q Q Q (D C N A A CL A 0 O1 •L N cn `C C A U .. L -� 5 V N m O (a v O O -C C O U N > o O N Cl) (a - O U) +� N O O U (u O N cn p cn L N ? N _ N Cc M C N � / U /��� (n L co �+ U �- v Q O +r �� N C C (n (II (n Q � m N 0 n � Q� 2 m � � L Q� U N 0 E U) ■ ■ ■ O U ■ ■ ■ C w (n aD ■ ■ A A A -\ A A\ U ^ � W C c� C O L N N LL cn O s U) 0 �o d FY 0 0 N N C 3 N N N 1--, cn N -C cl U Z (n v a) C in C (n 06 > O 01 fn O � Q `. a i U) N U c cc C `� a) tQ Q CL O :3 C ? 2 Q J E O 4- i O O N U) O .E 3 O } Q N U _ N N F— N N ( f c cn c Q U O O C O C m� m (� (� N m C Y C CD U N N - ca E (n i (D N C � C m C - m cv J O 0 0 Q m i cn O 3 O "a N m ui j :3 -0 N N (� C L (D U) C m "O cn N C C X W N N 0) C U co L O Q (a N C � N LL Q Q Q (D A A A A A A A U ^ � W C c� C O L N N LL cn O s U) 0 �o d FY 0 0 N N C 3 N N (1) G7 J (� U X Q E .� E Q U) � N U ,4L U }' m (D a) c a E > c E a) ° N U O Q .Q ( c E •U) N o O N U 0 C 4-0 LL cn cn L G7 Q p CL ,Q OU J z z X~ N > L O Q i cn (1) M O a) O Q U 0- Z (n Z 0 2 U) cu Q > U E U Q U c� m _ U > U E cn U Q ° a) U O D U cn c L U m a) c U o Q -t O a) c 0) - O N U E -Q Q a) N — U O C (n U c m cn c O_ L 4f (n x cn a) cn A A Q) � � � O CL O cu C N cm N N U Q Y N U N c E a) F c� o o }. c c U O U E Q C •� w � U) (B Q N a) > to N_ _0 =3 (a n - 2 O L N =; Q 00 O ` N .� N O cu O N C N N N c m Q C M Ma N N O 0 a Q N ov (n O U cn cn a O a� o 0) X ca in cn a • }I N W L M L X F o > U `- CU 4- c c ca co Q Q c m o c U A t3 W m zz 0 0 N m C 7 to N c �9 N W ^ 0 W CO J, s s� "j r - r r 1 i 9 S \ a) N C N C ` E � N � C �0 C U N y Y a�i = v� L aS v O LL 3 @ o LL c �ll.C.0 _ U O" O U Q C LO N N a) a) E a Y N O X (n (D N N (n (B fn A) O p N a) a) N fn m O O O ♦+ C ^, 0 C C (6 O O 0) U) o N U) uj Q) O C N U m Y U) >- > `� = C a) m m 'O C J c N N E a) - 6 SZ fB O U a) Q O U O E C J U -C Z >, c L.L .— o � �6 CU O !? U) Y � o N : LL o m o 0) Q N c ,�_ Q - N L O W a) cu (B U a) U > a O O L (B cn E W c C a) in cu (B (0 CL c n- O O N fl 0 U c m N a) a) T- a) - _a E O a O }• M _ 1 L , IL m O) N O L -p .N a) ~ _a LL a) ca E a) fn -a ' U U t0 N � C) 6c" (B ° ° Q �- (n a) c N � 7 o C Q N N C cn a) 7 O U (n 7 FA Q c v U cQ a) m e Z X u� ,.- Q) o N 0) in cn a) c .� c c cv Qm c N C co H O — o c- COY U C N V . O N fl >,O N N _ X .c U E_ C O ca E a) fn fn -C O O " O (B fd L o O c n m 20 A a) N C N C ` E � N � C �0 C U N y Y a�i = v� L aS v O LL 3 @ o LL c �ll.C.0 T U C a) E a Y O O N C (B U C E N fn m N 'C Y ^, 0 C 0) U) o N U) uj Q) U C N c `- w Y a) -S `� = Qm � CU -0 V r� c a) N fd a) c c o 3 C O U a (D +� oX -C Z W >, c L.L .— o � �6 CU U) Y Q cr a) 0) a) J c O cu a) O a O O L (B C C fn C L C cu (B (0 CL a) in O N E C n r� N J f4 •� CO L N 1 L , IL -p .N a) _a LL a) ca E L H N N U Ua)�' O U U E J N , N i O 2 G1 a) N C N C ` E � N � C �0 C U N y Y a�i = v� L aS v O LL 3 @ o LL c �ll.C.0 1 Q W w d ZE n 0 0 N d C 7 N N T Q C O c O_ O N 0 E m :3 ° Q a) U 0 N U) uj Q) (6 U Q a) o a) cu c -S Qm � CU oU) a) N a) c c o Q CL O U (D +� oX N Z W L L c C Y Q fn C a) J N O U C J .- O a O O N m (n O O fn C O U U — (B (0 CL a) in O N m A 1 Q W w d ZE n 0 0 N d C 7 N N c c 4- Q� F Q L.L 0 Q E m C/) v rr . a N Q C O N m Q 0 0 a) N N O O C t? w C N O v U (9 O N +-' m Q C - 0 C U) O N Y C (n C E O o U U-0 a) U O >+ tZ O ±+ +� it o (4 (� U N tZ L N ca N C C L O O C> 0) to 3 "� O p N Q 42 N O ' O O ~ U U) O o Q� J O N .` O C L O a) C O �, O N° iZ J N �, p fn > C fn N L M O C E L N 0 cu cu O N O Q -5 N N m O N ER CO f0 C2 N C (B C C - 0 U O _U) Q- O a) L U N � O ° (n L (� L L' �n "C L N M 3 ia LL _ U cd C: ° () n) U CU ce U c u Q (n <o U o (° u j cD °) _ c0 O O O C O j U C: % m w LL LL rn a o o ui °' c m °� - c c a _0 m _ � rn Y� °- 0 " r 5 E 0 o �� 3 CD Cl) cv O r o .CU O 0 a) a) -0 0° N ?, m O 0 U 0 sz N a) ° U Q ° C: u) (n CL a) ) ° z3 . a) s M a) a) O ° N O L _ c -o (B s U) v) U n o c} o i 3 is m '� cn 'c oo O a c u) •�) m e m o° i c Q o U) � W m o U C c O U 0- 0> • � (� m vi -0 N c M i cu V o 0 o O L i ` c cu 0 U C O / O 0 Z& o N 0 c o ° — 0: 0° (p a) ) o U c of ` 0 Q Jm 3 ^ m OU NZ.. U ■ ■ ■ W ■ ■ ■ L ■ ■ CL ■ ■ 1 Q O (n A A A A 0 d a n 0 N N 0 C 7 Lo N 0 c L U) ca 1 ♦J W E . W 4 -- 0 L 4- NN� 4— ^ O W Q E m U) Q W j „ 1 O U a O O O L U O N ■ 0 N N V ZE O 1 c ' O 3 O C >+ — C (6 O U E m L (n a) 'n o i Q"O L > N o 3 E 0 4 U � L � L C p fn .-• a) > O C U > : O o ( o C =� (0 OU Q 2 7 0 >+ t N O O to (0 70 O Q) L p U a) .. N a c 0 0 (n C CA O Y C > ca O ? = L a) O" � Y L (Q N U — O O fa �� O _ O O N O V Q N Q O O > L E cu J a� (0 ° Y E c6 O o Q U C Y o (� N E— cn > —_ L 06 W U O V/ � L 1 � . c u Y C Q J cu N Z 1 "O O / N O V m -0 Q) o U C p U W 0 E a) m \V 5 C M c6 O a Q) a) > ,[ E O> C N U N L C O U a) c L cu '0 c - Ile ca O m s E ° o o °� Q 3 _ ° a Cn ° rn o C O (n a) L o o v +� C C a� " c (Q . _ >, m Y a Z i Y O -0 - -� !n 7 (6 I r + EL C U) ° a) �' � CA a) a) a) w _ -0 = �-. Q Y U C c rn — N L L p .2 C ° O ° - p Of LL -- m >' c0 L O 0) m- N > O �- a) a� o = Z. a) U (6 cp U a cu `-- a) 0 rn c o N> a a) co a) Q C ap i Q > 3 L E c_ a) L U = d (n (0 m �L J (n W ,� U _� U m U A A A O U a O O O L U O N ■ 0 N N V ZE �1- V! 4-a ` W 1 4-0 E W L 4— O W Q. E Q W N d V V,, N _ L (Q O L c J Y M O C � N U) Q 0 _ C Q O N a) U (B J C 0) f6 f/� C 3 �' N O' (D ca rn m n 3 c - C c : m o m N a) o Z3 0 N 3 cB E o 0 N N a) �' U Y O > m QW a� 3 Y Z L a) t 0 0 O - " O 3 L ° w Y Q O E m N q C d m U C U C: OU M -0 �O Q N 3 U C C ' U a� +) N 3 70 o J U O N U c ,� U , 0 o a) o c ,� N o�' c o c U C U _ U m - C � C L N 2 N a) Q a) O Y N � O m O N a) Y n. Z a O . m (n n m� Y C M U =3 °>. U O C C 2 3 J Z m °' � N � IL U) O 2 r :3 N m U U) Y A A A Q W N d V V,, N c � � U) 4-0 C: � � � � 4-j c a) E � .� � a) -1--j C: w � � � � � � � � � 4-j � � � 4- 0 � E m C/) � @ U O U @ � � m � � � @ M � / U) v f _0 k / U) 0 (D m 0 £ - E m \ / o k � � E / § 7 0 / o m o t m § >1 m a 2 � / 4 / / a � : 0 % ° ° ° § o mfk %§ § �o ��LL .w < � Li .� 2 \ \ W) O � § cn $ k § (u G M / $ 2 % � m � � % § CL / � § o / o % & cu k 3 2 E 2 2 C k c co a ® : 2 / / 0 « / q k § 0 § .N '� @ o CL y E ' c E 2- k " k \ 0 C 0 R [ / q C -i U 6 - O . . . . . J 'A � @ U O U @ � � m � � � @ M � / U) v f _0 k / U) 0 (D m 0 £ - E m \ / o k � � E / § 7 0 / o m o t m § >1 m a 2 � / 4 / / a � : 0 % ° ° ° § o mfk %§ § �o ��LL .w < � Li .� 2 \ \ W) C7 C c O A , L_J C m O O Q Q E E O N Q W M N d Ell 0 0 N d C 7 b N O a) L O Q C O N : U _ W R W A J j D TOE C M _ (n uj O C 4--- a) N (n cn C (D o O co O U cn U CD O N _ O N >, N Q C', N U }' J CU m N M q N - 0 U m (a -Y .Y CO — U) � � Z; ' as 4-: \o m O _� 07 U O fA LO c O O (n LO -Q N N O- C >, O O }' }, O U L - Z (B q-- (a (a p N C6 (n C U) � N U N O I— Q U) C/) 0_ m U Co U) A A A A A A A A Q W M N d Ell 0 0 N d C 7 b N O a) L O : U R W A j TOE C O uj U 4--- N (n cn C (n o ,� co O cn O N N N C O U UU J O I CD N - 0 U (a -Y .Y C-r- cn p O 4-: o m cn � c O (n LO � � N O- C p (n U) 0 vi O Q- (n >' ti C) O C N I p o N cn E� U cn u> Q (a O O N p r !E I — to N - 2 aT N N N c C :) O +'�+ O L- O N >, O = oo 0 �O L N in N -E (n �. D O U) � LL _� `= N C cn O Ull M L- N >, OU >+ O v Q (� a) O � u j 0 N tN U Q V- O� U O O aa =� �D �� o� o �" Z3� I— U) tea, IL 8- a U o cv a� A A A A A A Q W M N d Ell 0 0 N d C 7 b N c W 0 N . O L '^� 5 Q ^ V/ L W � O m � N Q vi C O E O U C (a i Y ►a UL w: —I W U to '' S �I i O c� c c� C N CD CL aQ N . N 0 N .� M E CD O >- .� . 0 Q. > Z ♦� 3 _5 m N A n M ♦,, _ M a _ 5 O L N o 3 v ° M� E m ` O + 0 \� . �L . L __ • E cn A G� N Q vi C O E O U C (a i Y ►a UL w: —I W U to '' S �I i O c� c c� C - 1 Q N v N a 0 0 N N C 7 7 Ip N . T 10 C a d W 1 I n 0 Z a w N CD CL aQ N . N 0 N .� CD E CD O >- . 0 L > Z ♦� 3 _5 m N A n - 1 Q N v N a 0 0 N N C 7 7 Ip N . T 10 C a d W 1 I n 0 Z a w l O . cn O � 1 �J O U LL L O . L O U (D d' U) (D L 70 70 cu U) cu L ^ W U) ^ Q cu i ^ L W L O L 4— U N N c U) O U) 0 L O L L O U () W U) N a) U U M L- W M S U cu a) U ca a- U () cn L C O E O U a) L- m cn (a U cn L a) L C (IS L ca cn a) C O FA -F-+ W co i N 1� M O n 6-+ W L N a) N N a) L cn L N �� c O m U O L 4- a) m L- 0 rn m i-a O L �F- N O Q O a) I L U O L O L N C KGO U C O N O . W c M cu O W L O a1 L O N U � c6 0 ca OL cu L E L 0 U Q N U L cn L cn E D O U O C N L a) L E cn N cn cn Q N m O cn U cn L a) cn L N cn N cu N O �� A A A c� ca c a) a) O L ^` L 4 0J -� U c O c _0 O U cn E L O 0 O c u (B 0) c c a) c E > 0 N C It L E 0 O O E O U E N O ^ Q U cu W � i L N C O > m �+ O C c 0 c6 cu °6 c a� +- U a) w 3: Q o N O Rf U a) Q a) LM-- U) ca 0) c cu O cn E a) 4--j cn cn U L U _N a) N N � U � C Rf � O W cn N > ^ c � W O cu Ch L L cu O Q) a) U a) N a) E O m cu cu O a) E S O � U - 1 Q W N m ti O O N N C 7 C4 N MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 23, 2007 SUBJECT: A request for a work session to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regards thereto. (PEC07 -0019, 0020, 0021, 0022) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC Planner: Warren Campbell DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC, is requesting a public hearing with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West. At this work session the applicant will present a schedule that staff has helped to create showing what are believed to be the steps that will occur as the Ever Vail project moves forward through the entitlement process. The sequence of applications and meetings began with the amendments to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to include several new parcels and revise the recommendations for West Lionshead (Ever Vail). At this point in time applications that will begin to implement the recommendations in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan are being submitted. The first of these applications will be a request for a major subdivision to combine and reconfigure the lots comprising Ever Vail. The first step in this application will be a review of a preliminary plan which will lay the ground work for the submittal of a final plat at a later date. Review of the preliminary plan will occur prior to receiving a memorandum of understanding with CDOT regarding the potential Frontage Road realignment. A review of the final plat will occur subsequent of this understanding with CDOT as there should be little to no change required on the subsequent of any approvals granted for the final plat. The final plat, if approved, will not be recorded until such time as the Frontage Road is relocated and the transfer of right -of -way is completed upon acceptance of the new Frontage Road by CDOT. U A request for a rezoning of the lots created by the Ever Vail final plat will occur in conjunction with the request for review of the final plat. The Commission will be asked to make a recommendation on the rezoning request; however, as the final plat cannot be recorded until such time as the Frontage Road right -of -way exchange there cannot be the adoption of an ordinance by Council to effect the rezoning on the lots until the final plat is recorded, thus creating the lots. After review of the major subdivision and rezoning requests, applications will be submitted for conditional use permits and major exterior alterations to review the establishment of a parking structure(s) and ski lift within Ever Vail. These will be the first structures to be reviewed within Ever Vail and will include the facility to house the mountain operations equipment currently located on the Maintenance Yard and Holy Cross sites. Subsequent to the applications for the parking structure(s) and ski lift, major exterior alteration applications will be submitted for the mixed -use structures that will comprise the remainder of the Ever Vail. The Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission is being asked to listen to the presentation and provide any feedback or ask questions that are appropriate at this time. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission tables this application to the August 13, 2007, public hearing. 2 LJ Q t N � c � t c O j u y m O Q> M ry Y M � Q C � � E m O 0 Q Q Y y Y � R C p E 20 i �j✓ W �U O Z IL n < a V C R y U Q � C E � o - � N Q Y Y ry C 3 � � Y Q Y � IL E • u Y sl- N N m u u O y Q a x v c u~ w K 0 In K a. Q ,I a X Y u C F u E 75 O Q n D D U N E Q 7i O o y c � O Q � Y n. �a ( 1 J� J N 6' Y y d Q C Q U F MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 7, 2007 SUBJECT: Update to the Vail Town Council on the current status of the Ever Vail applications, their review, and the process moving forward. PURPOSE The redevelopment of the area known as Ever Vail is an intricate project with many applications and steps within the development review process. Staff and the Vail Resorts Development Company have scheduled a work session with the Vail Town Council in an effort to communicate the current status of the review process for Ever Vail, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West. A presentation to the Vail Town Council will include the review steps that are completed and the anticipated future steps in the review of the Ever Vail redevelopment. At this work session staff will present a schedule that the applicant and staff has created showing what are believed to be the steps that will occur as the Ever Vail project moves forward through the entitlement process. II. NEXT STEPS The sequence of applications and meetings began with the amendments to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to include several new parcels and revise the recommendations for West Lionshead (Ever Vail). At this point in time applications that will begin to implement the recommendations in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan are being submitted. The first of these applications will be a request for a major subdivision to combine and reconfigure the lots comprising Ever Vail. The first step in this application will be a review of a preliminary plan which will lay the ground work for the submittal of a final plat at a later date. Review of the preliminary plan will occur prior to receiving a memorandum of understanding with CDOT regarding the potential Frontage Road realignment. A review of the final plat will occur subsequent of this understanding with CDOT as there should be little to no change required on the subsequent of any approvals granted for the final plat. The final plat, if approved, will not be recorded until such time as the Frontage Road is relocated and the transfer of right -of -way is completed upon acceptance of the new Frontage Road by CDOT. • A request for a rezoning of the lots created by the Ever Vail final plat will occur in conjunction with the request for review of the final plat. The Commission will be asked to make a recommendation on the rezoning request; however, as the final plat cannot be recorded until such time as the Frontage Road right -of -way exchange there cannot be the adoption of an ordinance by Council to effect the rezoning on the lots until the final plat is recorded, thus creating the lots. It is anticipated that the requests for review of a preliminary plan and a recommendation for rezoning the two lots created by the preliminary plan /final plat will occur at the August 27, 2007, Planning and Environmental Commission. After review of the major subdivision and rezoning requests, applications will be submitted for conditional use permits and major exterior alterations to review the establishment of a parking structure(s) and ski lift within Ever Vail. These will be the first structures to be reviewed within Ever Vail and will include the facility to house the mountain operations equipment currently located on the Maintenance Yard and Holy Cross sites. It is anticipated that review of these applications will occur in the coming months, prior to the end of the year. Subsequent to the applications for the parking structure(s) and ski lift, major exterior alteration applications will be submitted for the mixed -use structures that will comprise the remainder of the Ever Vail. III. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL There is no action requested of Council at this time IV. ATTACHMENTS 0 A. Copy of the Ever Vail Process Flow Chart • 2 e MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 25, 2007 SUBJECT: A request for a work session to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regards thereto. (PEC07 -0019, 0020, 0021, 0022) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Maurielio Planning Group LLC Planner: Warren Campbell I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Vail Resorts Development Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC, has requesting a public hearing with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to discuss the development review applications necessary for the review of the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West. The applicant and staff would like to propose the following discussion topics for the hearing: • Introduction • Market Analysis • Presentation by Midge McCauley • Findings of Lionshead and Ever Vail retail study LEED for Neighborhood Development Pilot Program • Presentation by Callison architect • Discussion of LEED program • How LEED will affect materials and architecture in Ever Vail The Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission is being asked to listen to the presentation and provide any feedback that is appropriate at this time. • Is there any initial input the Commission would like to provide n the topics presented? C • Are there any requests for information that may be atypical to the standard review process that the Commission believes is needed to review the applications associated with Ever Vail? • Are there any items of concern for the Commission that should be addressed moving forward? The development of Ever Vail will have multiple applications associated with the process of moving forward through the entitlements. The approval from CDOT to realign the Frontage Road is the lynch pin in the development of Ever Vail. The process with CDOT has begun and formal applications will be submitted in the near future. As we move forward many applications will need to be reviewed with the assumption that CDOT will approve the Frontage Road realignment. Just like with the Front Door applications, which hinged upon the land exchange with the Forest Service, Ever Vail, will be moving forward while CDOT is reviewing the application for the Frontage Road realignment. II. BACKGROUND On December 11, 2006, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendments by a vote of 4 -1 -0 (Jewitt opposed). The initial concepts include, the addition of a skier gondola in the location of the old gas station site, the development of mixed use areas, including housing, retail, and office spaces, to create a new portal to the mountain with all the typical skier services, and the possible relocation of the South Frontage Road. On January 2, 2007, the Town Council directed staff to remove Tract K and the other parcels proposed for inclusion within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan by the Town staff from the proposed text amendments. In addition, at this hearing direction was given to staff and Vail Resorts regarding employee housing, traffic generation and mitigation, and a transit center. On February 6, 2007, the Town Council by a vote 5 -1 -0 (Foley opposed) approved Resolution No. 4, Series of 2007, which adopted the amendments to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan for the area known as "West Lionshead". On May 14, 2007, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing for the introduction of the Ever Vail development. At this hearing several members of the Team working on the development were introduced. The Commission provided so initial feedback. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission tables this application to the June 25, 2007, public hearing. 2 Warren Campbell - RE: Ever Vail June 25th Agenda From: 'Thomas Miller" <TMiller1 @vailresorts.com> To: "Warren Campbell" <WCampbell @vailgov.com> Date: 06/20/2007 9:42:29 AM Subject: RE: Ever Vail June 25th Agenda Warren- The current program, which is subject to change, calls for the following: GRFA = 723,456 Dwelling Units = 273 whole ownership, 45 fractional, 40 Vacation Club, 100 hotel /lodging Commercial Floor Area = 123,456 Employee Housing = 21,321 Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Tom Thomas Miller Project Manager Vail Resorts Development Company 137 Benchmark Road Avon, CO 81620 (o) 970 - 754 -2544 It (f) 970 - 754 -2555 (m) 970 - 470 -1062 Tmiller1 @ vailresorts.com Visit one of our websites at www.snow.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Warren Campbell [mailto:WCampbell @vailgov.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:38 AM To: Thomas Miller Subject: Re: Ever Vail June 25th Agenda Tom, Can you send me the latest numbers you believe at the current moment you will be developing in Ever Vail. G RFA -? Dwelling Units -? Commercial Floor Area -? Thanks warren >>> 'Thomas Miller" <TMiller1 @ vail resorts. com> 06/19/2007 4:44 PM >>> Warren- �1 new lift and as such the need for regular shuttle service would be minimized. However, some provisions for bus stops and /or a transit facility should be considered for the parking structure, 4.9 Housing 4.9.4 Potential Housing Sites Following are specific sites that have been identified as suitable for locals and employee housing (see Map W). - 4.9.4.3 Vail Associates Service Yard Holy Cross Site, Yail Professional Building, Cascade Crossin North Day Lot, and - th — e iTormer gas station site All redevelopment in West Lionshead will need to conform to the Town's housing policies and requirements. In order to create activity and vibrancy in West Lionshead it is appropriate to include some dispersed employee housing opportunities for permanent local residents in proposed developments in the area consistent with these policies. Perhaps the most promising locations to replace the Sunbird affordable housing project and to conform to the Town's housing policies and requirements for new employee housing generation in Ir w Lionshead are the North Day Lot, Vail Associates service yard, and Holy Cross site. However, housing is not the only use these three properties will need to support. The North Day lot is considered to be the preferred location for a significant housing project in Lionshead to replace the Sunbird affordable housing project and provide housing for new employee generation. The North Day Lot may also need to accommodate a transit center on the ground level of the development site. Additionally, it may be necessary to develop a higher revenue- enera Ing p roduct on a portion of the Vail Associates service yard Holy Cross, V ail P ro essiona uildino, and Cascade Crossing sites in order to defra road and infrastructure improvements. In planning the site, the following issues need to e considered: Density The site offers a unique opportunity to achieve significant density. While it is important that buildings here be visually consistent with the overall character of Lionshead, the desire to maximize the housin potential may make appropriate the following deviations rom s an ar evelo ment arame ers. First, it may e appropriate to allow fora rea�ter overall building height than is otherwise allowed under th Lionshead Architectural Design Guidelines Any increase in building height will need to be reviewed on • • a case by case basis by the Town of Vail, and any eventual building height will still need to be visually appropriate for this location. Second, it is recommended that the standards for density (units per acre) be increased at this location to allow for a greater number of employee housing units. Third, it may b e a propriate to reduce the parking re uirem nts f r employee housing at t is location. 4.9.4.4 Red Sandstone Parking Area The parking lot and Town of Vail transit stop at the base of the Red Sandstone Elementary school were identified as a potential site for employee or locals housing because of its proximity to the elementary school, the I -70 pedestrian overpass and the transit stop. However, the access (vehicular and pedestrian), safety and functional programming needs of the elementary school must take priority in any potential housing development scenario. 4.9.4.5 Old Town Shoos The Old Town Shops, located just west of the Vail sanitation plant, were identified as potential employee housing locations during the master planning process. There are, however, other significant demands on this • site, including potential expansion of the sanitation plant and the need for a new snowcat mountain access route from the Vail Associates service yard. In addition, the presence of the sanitation plant on one side and the existing gas station on the other reduces the desirability of this location for employee or locals housing. (in part) CHAPTER 5 Detailed Plan Recommendations This section of the Lionshead Master plan examines individual parcels and groups of parcels within the Lionshead study area, excluding the residential properties on the south side of Gore Creek. The intent of this chapter — and the Master plan as a whole - is to identify important functional relationships and visual objectives within the district and to propose a framework for the long -term redevelopment of Lionshead. The document does not intend to limit or eliminate ideas relating to specific parcels; any proposals consistent with this framework should be considered even if they are not anticipated in this document. The parcels addressed here are organized generally from east to west, starting with the civic hub on the e astern end of the parking structure. • L Ever Vail Programming Meeting April 11th, 2007 DEt7iG�4 �£ -ZjDw -5 C;'� 10 LtE S A2Cj. v 472A it 1-4r AI IqA i '� C7�S2� I� tai ,,.4 L-e - r- H A .I = 70) C osr : L3E C: I %W Lead Topic �ks iex t U-P 52�� Cbo d� - /t�j lPacf �✓r,'�enfs v zq i T&--f�v X07 � cuP -7 &,,-- ,er- �o %r1 -cow no J I� 9 �o t a Vj v 3 2 V I 1 �.. \ v "A- v' — . 11 z �, N 3' v J I\ wl J ` V C•7 3 a� Z 0 � N J Q V 0 0 0 r I 3 a� Z 0 � N J Q V 0 0 0 , ; !mu V:fiji ! .; ; i I O I z 0 r: 1 1 � kv �► l� - sills,.��` ,► M I!: 1 — fir ?1 X11 •' �, I� 17 �� I � 1 I rte. e1141 xi �I -, O i l l . Av" . ':: Ii1TII i' I X 6 7 AN `t ►. .u• l ..Z ' al l os- ki q m ` v ` k HEY 0 I � �e / Ij W J A i fl If IJ CIO 14 AL- . + �_ s r i• �. _ �.1 i&42iF A. ,, -7Ah V. I.-= -1 . CG�,a�"E 1� �X�►E.� u Ic Fo R Com PI c ri o�-1 .l • �Jc.� � s s�u�� Ll • � C..l � � �i i S i O iJ `_ C t � �4 • (� 71 : 1. ti� t Mauriello Planning Group Ever Vail Draft Project Review Schedule Revised 10 -13 -08 Proposed submittal date and schedule: October 2 1 Town Council - TOV staff presentation on process and roles October 27 Full submittal of all applications to the Town November 4 Town Council — Staff update that a full submittal was received Pz/- November 18 Town Council - TOV Staff Overview of Master Plan 0 i �',, CI A 0 November 24 PEC Worksession — Project overview /Programming/ December 2 I JO (r4- Town Council — Project Overview /Programming/�e# en;n - Benefits /Market Position/Why? n' eeY1 l ,� . �'�jo✓1 l December 3 DRB — Project Overview /Programming/Process /Schedule ahr S, ? �6//11r December 8 PEC Worksession — Site PlannincJ/Transit/Traffic Circulation 3 " 7 rt December 10 Open douse /Community Meeting at Donovan Pavilion December I G Town Council - Site Planning/Transit/Traff ic Circulation Q iA 0A 1 January 2 09 ry PE W r i J co (►�/►�E[UG� C o ksess on — Parking/Pedestrian Circulation January 20 Town Council — Parking/Pedestrian Circulation Q' "7 January 2G PEC Worksession - Follow -up Issues on previous presentations February 3 Joint Worksession — PEC/TC /DRB — Building height, bulk, and mass February 4 - 13 Potential Community Open House February 23 PEC Worksession — Respond to outstanding issues March 3 Town Council — Update on process /outstanding issues March 9 PEC Potential Vote — Zoning, Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Major Exterior Alteration (all applications) March I G Town Council Update March 23 PEC Potential Vote April 7 Town Council — Project recap and discussion /conditions of approval April 2 1 Town Council — Di5cu55ion of project May 5 Town Council — Approval of Rezoning (first reading) May 19 Town Council — Approval of rezoning and preliminary subdivision plan, approval of all applications May 20 — October DRB review of buildhng5 /land5cape plan Mauriello Planning Group Ever Vail TOV Coordination Meeting Agenda • Proposed TOV /VRDC weekly meeting schedule - Thursdays at 10:00 o Alternating topics of Design/Planning vs. Engineering and Transportation C E vE2y 04- u.tewsia, • Proposed project schedule and review schedule • Proposed Ever Vail submittal and review schedule • Major Exterior Alteration p C 004 - -P , � 'cG � oa. • Rezoning • Preliminary Subdivision Plan • CUP for Parking Structure • CUP for Gondola • CUP for Type 3 employee housing units on the first floor • CUP for Maintenance Facility • • Text Amendment for Corg-park • •. 4r Review of transit stops and facilities locatio s n • Discussion of process for South Frontage Road Improvements - DRB process • Other Business Cr42S • Tuuc.1:t> • $u �cs • 5v -l' C r)ROF , (!)W- 1 Ao Tr=2— -->ku rrl 4F-:, V A I L.. R E S O F2 T 5 D E V E L O P M E N T C O M P A N Y Mayor Dick Cleveland Town Council c/o Warren Campbell 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81620 Re: Town Council Questions on EverVail Rezoning Application Dear Mr. Mayor and Town Council Members: On behalf of Vail Resorts, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to give you an overview of the most recent development plan for the EverVail project. We look forward to proceeding through the Town of Vail's full development review process once the rezoning of the right -of- way and west end of the property is negotiated, hopefully approved and behind us. In the interest of public involvement and to build on the positive momentum derived from the various in -home neighborhood meeting I have been conducting, we are planning a series of community engagement opportunities in the next few months to explore the project more thoroughly with you and the community. We believe this will be important to ensuring the EverVail project will be developed with input from all stakeholders generating a result that we all can be proud of for years to come. We wanted to respond more formally to many of the questions you had at the July 1, 2008 worksession and have restated the questions and provided answers to these questions below. We hope this will help you more fully understand the scope of the project and the process. The questions are in no particular order. 1. Who will fund the relocation and reconstruction of the South Frontage Road? Vail Resorts initiated the process for the realignment and reconstruction of the South Frontage Road with CDOT based on the direction found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Vail Resorts is fully responsible for all costs related to the realignment and construction of the new roadway. 2. How will Beetle killed trees be used within the project? • Vail Resorts is exploring ways to utilize these local dead trees within the project. We are currently considering the use of the timber for accent elements for both interior and exterior applications. We will know more about this once we get further into the process of developing the detailed plans and researching the reasonable use of this timber within the project. VAIi RCEOR TE' Vail Rr +oitx Development Co mpaik • 1.37 Bcnehmark Road • Posh Office Sox 959 • :loon. Colorado 31620 -0959 . (970) 845-2535 • fax (970) Bd•5 - 25;15 • WWWArde.com ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... ........................ Vail . Breckenridge • Keyeltone" • Benner Crerk'r' . Bachelor GalIC1 0 • Arrowliend "° • Red Sky Ranch �'� 3. Are the 400 public parking spaces that Vail Resorts is proposing in the parking structure at the west end of the site above and beyond the parking required to serve the uses proposed on the EverVail property? Yes. Those public parking spaces are intended to address any Forest Service parking requirement and help address existing parking deficiencies within the Town. Additionally, there are another approximately 630 parking spaces that will also be public spaces serving the commercial components of the project, similar to how the town's public parking structure provide parking for commercial patrons today in Vail Village and Lionshead. In addition to that, all of the residential, employee housing, and hotel uses will also be parked within the project to the tune of approximately 350 spaces. So the residential owners, guests, and visitors will not be utilizing the nearly 1,030 public parking spaces described above (1,600 spaces total currently planned). While this may be refined and changed during the review process with the Town, this is what is currently being planned. 4. How was the 400 space public parking number arrived at? • In 2005, VR met with the Forest Service to discuss the new West Lionshead Gondola. At that time, VR and the Forest Service agreed to build 300 parking spaces within a reasonable walking distance to the Gondola. These spaces are not meant to allow additional skier capacity on the Mountain, but they are meant as a "redistribution and alleviation" of the existing skier parking and distribution in Vail thus addressing some of Vail's parking deficiencies. In 2007, VRDC in discussion with VR Mountain Operations decided to plan an additional 100 parking spaces to bring the total spaces allocated to public parking to 400 spaces. As noted below, Vail Resorts is not seeking to increase the on- mountain skier capacity. 5. What are Vail Resorts projections of "new" day skiers utilizing the EverVail portal to Vail Mountain? VR internal studies have concluded that the EverVail Gondola will load approximately 12% of skiers onto the mountain. This 12% is not a new generation but rather a re- distribution of existing skiers. Vail Resorts does not anticipate EverVail generating any significant increase in day skiers due to the development of EverVail. Certainly any of the residential, employee housing, and lodging guests or owners living or staying within the project will most likely use this as their primary portal to the ski area. These users will all be parked within the project separate from the public skier and commercial parking found on the property. Vail Resorts also anticipates that some current users of Vail Village, Golden Peak, and Lionshead portals deciding to use this portal instead which would act as a redistribution of present skiers who may be parking elsewhere or arriving via mass transit. 6. What types of retail facilities are anticipated within the EverVail project? Vail Resorts has not entered into any agreements with any specific retailers at this time, however, Vail Resorts is planning for a variety of retail and restaurants that would serve both the local residents as well as the guests to Vail. There would be a variety of higher end retail and restaurants and others aimed at a more local market. There would certainly be ski rental type facilities and well as spa facilities within EverVail. The concepts about the types of commercial and strategic locations within EverVail will be more refined during the development review process with the Town. 7. How are the streets and pedestrian areas within the EverVail project being snow - melted? Is there a way to heat these areas using solar or some other environmentally superior method? Vail Resorts has applied to the United States Green Building Council to rate this project by the LEED system at the Platinum certification level; the program's highest rating and with very few projects in the world meeting this high of a certification. It is Vail Resorts goal to make the project as "green" as possible and Vail Resorts is therefore exploring these types of opportunities within the EverVail project. The source of heat for the snowmelt system is one of the areas Vail Resorts is exploring and we will have more detail in that regard as plans are more fully developed through the Town's development review process. 8. What percentage of the total office space square footage is currently being planned for lease versus use by Vail Resorts for operations? • Vail Resorts is currently plarming approximately 30,000- 40,000 sq. ft. of total office area within the project. Outside of the snowcat maintenance facilities being provided for in the project, Vail Resorts is currently planning to occupy approximately 50% for its own uses thus leaving approximately 15,000- 25,000 sq. ft. as leased space. 9. How much residential floor area is being planned within the project? Vail Resorts currently planning approximately 500,000 gross sq. ft. of residential floor area and approximately 80,000 - 100,000 gross sq. ft. of employee housing (currently planned at 60 -80 %). Additionally, the current plans include approximately 116,000 sq. ft. of floor area in the hotel. GRFA numbers will certainly be lower than the gross numbers and will be refined as the plans become more fully developed through the Town development review process. 10. How many stories will the buildings be within the project? • As currently envisioned, buildings range in height from 3 stories in some areas to 6 stories in other areas. Vail Resorts continues to refine the conceptual massing of the project and it will be even more refined through the Town's review process. 11. Will there be a transit facility within the project? Provisions for transit functions and facilities have been planned into the project. Some transit and shuttle functions will exist adjacent to and within the public parking structure and others will occur along "High Street" at the top of the main pedestrian plaza within the project. The detail of these functions still need to be developed working with the Town during the review process. At this tune, pedestrians will not have to travel further by foot to the gondola after parking or being delivered by transit than either Vail Village or Lionshead. (We need to be sure this is correct) 12. Will the Forest Service's current skier capacity number be modified as a result of this project? No, the Forest Service will not allow additional capacity on Vail Mountain. 13. What is the anticipated development schedule for the EverVail project? If this rezoning is approved, Vail Resorts hopes to break ground on the new section of South Frontage Road in the spring of 2009. That road should be completed by spring of 2010. The project will generally develop from the west to the east with the public parking structure and employee housing located on the west beginning in spring of 2010. Full project completion is anticipated by December of 2018. 14. Will a Conditional Use Permit review of the parking structure and gondola be required for the project? Yes. Both of these uses will require conditional use permits and major exterior alteration applications. All of these applications will require review and approval by the Town. The conditional use permit applications for the gondola and parking structure were submitted to the Town in March of 2007. Those applications were put on hold by the Town until after the review and approval of the rezoning application. Revised applications will be required for both of these uses. 15. Will the Town be compensated for the increase in distance required to operate the in -town bus service? Vail Resorts has been working closely with the Town on the new bus stop locations for the in -town bus as well as the other bus routes. Vail Resorts has not had any discussions with the Town about any specific compensation for the increase in lane miles generated by the project other than general discussions about the TIFF dollars and additional sales tax and lodging revenues being created by the project and -flowing to the Town's coffers. Vail Resorts is willing to discuss how the TIFF money is used and how it might be directed to offset the costs to the Town's transportation operations. We hope that we have adequately addressed the questions we heard at the last hearing. There may have been other questions which were answered at the last hearing that are not reflected here but we believe we captured the more significant questions you had for us. Thank you again for your diligent work on this project and the many other pressing issues for the Town of Vail. We sincerely hope that, with this project, we can be part of the solutions to the two major issues that most of you cited in your election campaigns, Employee Housing and Parking, as well as developing a world class addition to the world's greatest mountain. Sincerel , Thomas Miller Director of Development — Eagle County Vail Resorts Development Company Page 1 of 2 Warren Campbell - Minutes/Results of October 9 Ever Vail meeting with TOV and VRDC From: To: Date: Subject: CC: "Dominic Mauriello" "'Warren Campbell "' , "'George Ruther "' , , "'Tom Kassmel "' 10/09/2008 1:25 PM Minutes/Results of October 9 Ever Vail meeting with TOV and VRDC "'Michael Brekka "' , "'Allison Kent "' , "'Jennifer Babcock "' , "'Kent Kriehn "' "'Thomas Miller "' Hello Everyone: Below are the conclusions reached at the Ever Vail meeting we held at TOV today: Ever Vail: *Our nex t meeting with be held on Friday, October 17 at 10:00 am at Com Dev. an agenda to follow *There will not be a meeting on October 23 •W arren and Greg indicated that there would be a Town Council meeting on Ever Vail on Nov. 21 to discuss the applications coming in and the process. This hearing is to be run solely by TOV staff. •Domi nic distributed a proposed meeting schedule. A revised schedule adding dates discussed at the meeting will be forwarded to Warren and TOV staff will review and offer comments /revisions. • It was indicated by Tom Miller that we would begin working on the AIPP plan during the process, on t he early end. *The Town 's White Paper indicated the need for 5 charter bus drop off locations. These bus loading and unloading areas may need to be managed with VR operations /ski school. A plan to manage these is needed. •W hile the White Paper indicated a need for 3 additional skier drop -off spaces, Greg Hall recommended that VR talk internally with Chris Jarnot on what is needed and how it might be managed. VR will follow -up on this issue. •I t was recommended by Greg Hall that 3 to 4 hotel shuttles spaces be provided. The dwell time is about 5 mins for these shuttles. • It was concluded that Ever Vail transit accommodation would not be in the form of a transit center but rather as "bus stops." The following need was indicated by Greg Hall: 0 2 bus spaces for TOV buses, one of which would be in -town shuttle which does not have to be in same locations as the other spaces. One suggestion from Greg was to locate it on Forest Road right -of -way at the far east end of the project to reduce added time to route. 0 2 Eco bus spaces 0 1 shared TOV /Eco space •VR needs to consider Lodge van access to any hotel in the project as well as taxi locations North Day Lot: •W e also discussed the revised plan for the NDL skier drop off. Greg indicated he has approved file://CADocuments and Settings \Administrator \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \48EE06... 10/10/2008 Page 2 of 2 this plan and Warren indicated he would staff approved the DRB application with a few conditions by the end of the day. *Tom Miller indicated that VR legal would be finalizing any agreements with TOV on the skier drop off in the next day or so. Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP Mauriello Planning Group, LLC PO Box 1127 5601A Wildridge Road Avon, Colorado 81620 970 - 748 -0920 phone 970 - 748 -0377 fax dominic mp gvail.com L� file: //C: \Documents and Settings \Administrator \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \48EE06... 10/10/2008 Mauriello Planning Group Ever Vail TOV Coordination Meeting Agenda • Continued discussion transportation /transit — Number of spaceMocation /etc. o Update from Greg on needs • Revised Submittal Schedule with DRB and Town Council inserted • Next meeting T l � • Cancel October I G due to conference ?! • After our submittal? ,/1` 1eN �i • Other issues t 1�4 O U3 euze--s a 710 wlo a 6 c � sW s Mauriello Planning Group Ever Vail TOV Coordination Meeting Proposed submittal date and schedule: Dd-A -06-r ;111 Tc 0 - a Aoie5 October 27 Full submittal of all applications to the Town December 8 ecember 10 December I G January 12, 09 January 20 January 2G February 3 February 4 — 13 February 23 March 3 Town Council — Staff update that a full submittal was received - rG -LRAAP PEC Worksession — Project overview /Programming/Process /Schedule Town Council — Project Overview /Programming /Process /Sche I DRB — Project Overview /Programming/Process /Schedule .1 PEC Worksession — Site Planning/Transit/Traffic Circulation Open House /Community Meeting at Donovan Pavilion Town Council - Site Planning /Transit/Traffic Circulation co:"".44 Pic { bRB c«n 'q 0 0 A Town PEC Worksession — Parking/Pedestrian Circulation OW Town Council — Parking/Pedestrian Circulation .e cdff^ PEC Work5C551on - Follow -up Issues on previous presentations Joint Worksession — PEC/TC /DRB — Budding height, bulk, and mass Potential Community Open House PEC Worksession — Respond to outstanding issues Town Council — Update on process /outstanding issues March 9 PEC Potential Vote — Zoning, Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Mayor Exterior Alteration (all applications) March I G Town Council Update March 23 PEC Potential Vote April 7 Town Council — Project recap and discussion of conditions of approval April 2 1 Town Council — Discussion of project /1 -1 1 d.T' November 4 A)00 I $ November 24 December 2 n D December 3 O nC� D J� 1Ilk December 8 ecember 10 December I G January 12, 09 January 20 January 2G February 3 February 4 — 13 February 23 March 3 Town Council — Staff update that a full submittal was received - rG -LRAAP PEC Worksession — Project overview /Programming/Process /Schedule Town Council — Project Overview /Programming /Process /Sche I DRB — Project Overview /Programming/Process /Schedule .1 PEC Worksession — Site Planning/Transit/Traffic Circulation Open House /Community Meeting at Donovan Pavilion Town Council - Site Planning /Transit/Traffic Circulation co:"".44 Pic { bRB c«n 'q 0 0 A Town PEC Worksession — Parking/Pedestrian Circulation OW Town Council — Parking/Pedestrian Circulation .e cdff^ PEC Work5C551on - Follow -up Issues on previous presentations Joint Worksession — PEC/TC /DRB — Budding height, bulk, and mass Potential Community Open House PEC Worksession — Respond to outstanding issues Town Council — Update on process /outstanding issues March 9 PEC Potential Vote — Zoning, Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Mayor Exterior Alteration (all applications) March I G Town Council Update March 23 PEC Potential Vote April 7 Town Council — Project recap and discussion of conditions of approval April 2 1 Town Council — Discussion of project /1 -1 1 d.T' May 5 • May 19 May 20 — October • Town Council — Approval of Rezonincg (first reading) Town Council — Approval of rezoning and preliminary 5ubdivi5ion plan, approval of all applications DRB review of building5 /land5cape plan ILA Mauriello Planning Group Ever Vail TOV Coordination Meeting Proposed submittal date and schedule: i Note: DRB and Town Council meetings to be Inserted periodically In process October 27 November 24 -DV..V-5 12-1 s December 8 December 10 January 12, 09 January 2G Full submittal of all applications to the Town Su61aivi5i0&.], PEC Work5e551on — Project Overview ��-, I 0_ ?nC_ lIW* ..1 I �y 0,-W f use PEC Worksession — Continued project review Open House /Community Meeting at Donovan Pavilion PEC Worksession - Continued project review PEC Worksession - Continued project review II February I — 13 Potential Community Open House February 23 PEC Potential Vote March 9 PEC Potential Vote March 23 PEC Potential Vote February 23 — April 30 Potential Town Council Call -up and Hearing April 30 — October 2009 DRB review of buildings /landscape plan Maurlollo Planning Group Ever Vail TOV Coordination Meeting Agenda Y • Proposed TOV /VRDC weekly meeting schedule — Thursdays at 10:00 o Alternating t0pIc5 of Design/Planning v5. Engineering and TranSportation • Proposed project schedule and review Schedule • Proposed Ever Vail Submittal and review schedule • Mayor Exterior Alteration IF !� S fe( n • Rezoning f I A meadvned-5 - • Preliminary Subdivision Plan / • CUP for Parking Structure • CUP for Gondola • CUP for Type 3 employee housing units on the first floor • CUP for Maintenance Facility • Text Amendment for Core parking rates D12-1 G • Review of transit stops and facilities locations rocd kdr) T J • Di5cu55ion of process for South Frontage Road improvements — DRB process • Other Business 66D 4� o6 4 �tr 6" C 6rfer j4,,s S— Mauriello Planning Group Ever Vail TOV Coordination Meeting Proposed submittal date and schedule: Note: DRB and Town Council meetings to be inserted periodically in process October 27 Full submittal of all applications to the Town November 24 PEC Worksession — Project Overview 3 December 8 PEC Worksession — Continued project review De ember 10 Open House /Community Meeting at Donovan Pavilion EZ P AR0 January 12, 09 PEC Worksession - Continued project review January 26 PEC Worksession - Continued project review February I — 13 Potential Community Open House February 23 PEC Potential Vote po,,, 0 I March 9 PEC Potential Vote March 23 PEC Potential Vote February 23 — April 30 Potential Town Council Call -up and Hearing April 30 — October 2009 DRB review of buildings/landscape plan A ASC CDoT n TO: Vail Town Council MEMORANDUM FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 1, 2008 SUBJECT: Update to the Vail Town Council on the current status of the Ever Vail applications, their review, and the process moving forward. PURPOSE The redevelopment of the area known as Ever Vail is an intricate project with many applications and steps within the development review process. Staff and the Vail Resorts Development Company have scheduled a work session with the Vail Town Council in an effort to communicate the current status of the review process for Ever Vail, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West. A presentation to the Vail Town Council will include the review steps that are completed and the anticipated future steps in the review of the Ever Vail redevelopment. The applicant will also provide a power point presentation on where they are with regard to design for Ever Vail. • II. BACKGROUND The sequence of applications and meetings to create a new base village to known as Ever Vail began with the amendments to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to include several new parcels and revise the recommendations for West Lionshead (Ever Vail). On December 11, 2006, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendments by a vote of 4 -1 -0 (Jewitt opposed). The initial concepts include the addition of a skier gondola in the location of the old gas station site and the development of mixed use areas, including housing, retail, and office spaces, to create a new portal to the mountain with all the typical skier services. Another aspect of the initial concepts includes the possible relocation of the South Frontage Road. On February 6, 2007, the Town Council adopted Resolution 4, Series of 2007, containing the proposed Lionshead Master Plan amendments to include several properties comprising Ever Vail and recommendations for those properties. Resolution 4, Series of 2007, was adopted by a vote of 5 -1 -0 (Foley opposed). On August 7, 2007, the Town Council held a work session to discuss the Ever Vail entitlement process. At this meeting a flow chart depicting the various applications and the order in which they need to be completed was presented and discussed. This is the last time a formal presentation was provided to the Council regarding the Ever Vail project. O The first application to begin the entitlement process for Ever Vail was a request for a major subdivision to combine and reconfigure the lots comprising Ever Vail. The first step in this application was a review of a preliminary plan which will lay the ground work for the submittal of a final plat at a later date. Review of the preliminary plan occurred prior to receiving a memorandum of understanding with CDOT regarding the potential Frontage Road realignment. A review of the final plat will occur subsequent of this understanding with CDOT as there should be little to no change required on any approvals granted for the final plat. The final plat, if approved, will not be recorded until such time as the Frontage Road is relocated and the transfer of right -of -way is completed upon acceptance of the new Frontage Road by CDOT. On September 24, 2007, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved the Preliminary Plan for the platting of Ever Vail by a unanimous vote. A request for a rezoning of the lots created by the Ever Vail final plat occurred in conjunction with the request for review of the preliminary plan. The Commission made a recommendation on the rezoning request; however, as the final plat cannot be recorded until such time as the Frontage Road right -of -way exchange with CDOT there cannot be the adoption of an ordinance by Council to effect the rezoning on the lots until the final plat is recorded, thus creating the lots. On October 22, 2007, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 5 -1 -0 (Cleveland opposed) to forward a recommendation of approval for the rezoning of the properties known as Cascade Crossing, the Vail Professional Building, and portion of the South Frontage Road right -of -way that would become a part of developable lots once O the Frontage Road were relocated to parallel the interstate. III. NEXT STEPS At this point in time the next steps are that the Town Council can review the recommendation from the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding the rezoning of several parcels comprising the Ever Vail site. I a rezoning were approved there would need to be conditions placed upon the approval as the rezoning could not take affect until the Frontage Road were realigned, thus allowing for a final plat to be approved and recorded creating the lots which are to be rezoned. Presently there are applications in the Community Development Department for the review of conditional use permits for a public /private parking structure and new gondola. These applications have been on hold for some time as the preliminary plan and rezoning request were heard by the Planning and Environmental Commission. These will be the first structures to be reviewed within Ever Vail and will include the facility to house the mountain operations equipment currently located on the Maintenance Yard and Holy Cross sites. Subsequent to the applications for the parking structure(s) and ski lift, major exterior alteration applications will be submitted for the mixed -use structures that will comprise the remainder of the Ever Vail. A flow chart has been attached which depicts the applications and order in which they will occur to entitle the Ever Vail project . IV. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL There is no action requested of Council at this time 2 E • U O U) LL Ep 1 (09 /23/2008) Wa rren Campb - Winston Evervail Fee Estimate From: George Ruther To: Thomas Miller Date: 09/17/2008 7:19 PM Subject: Winston Evervail Fee Estimate Attachments: EverVail FeeEstl.pdf CC: Warren Campbell Tom- I have attached a draft copy of Winston & Associates fee estimate for consultation on the Evervail Project. At this time all figures are speculative based on assumptions as of this date. I hope this is helpful. For your budget justification purposes, please note that pursuant to the Town's development code, Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have design, land use, or other issues which may have impact on the community may require review by consultants in addition to staff. Should a determination be made by the Town Staff that an outside consultant is needed, the Community Development Department may hire the consultant. The Department shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay the consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time of filing an application. Expense incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town. Any excess funds will be returned to the applicant upon review completion. Do not hesitate to call me with questions. Thanks, George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81658 (970) 479 -2145 (o) (970) 479 -2452 (f) (970) 376 -2675 (c) 1, U F(09/23/2 W arren C ampbell - Re Winston Everva Fee Esti Page 1 From: To: Date: Subject: Thomas Miller <TMiller1 @vailresorts.com> "'GRuther @vailgov.com "' <GRuther @vailgov.com> 09/17/2008 7:21 PM Re: Winston Evervail Fee Estimate CC: "'WCampbell @vailgov.com "' <WCampbell @vailgov.com> Thanks, this is what I needed. - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: George Ruther <GRuther @vailgov.com> To: Thomas Miller Cc: Warren Campbell <WCampbell @vailgov.com> Sent: Wed Sep 17 19:19:46 2008 Subject: Winston Evervail Fee Estimate Tom- 0 I have attached a draft copy of Winston & Associates fee estimate for consultation on the Evervail Project. At this time all figures are speculative based on assumptions as of this date. I hope this is helpful. For your budget justification purposes, please note that pursuant to the Town's development code, Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have design, land use, or other issues which may have impact on the community may require review by consultants in addition to staff. Should a determination be made by the Town Staff that an outside consultant is needed, the Community Development Department may hire the consultant. The Department shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay the consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time of filing an application. Expense incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town. Any excess funds will be returned to the applicant upon review completion. Do not hesitate to call me with questions. Thanks, George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81658 (970) 479 -2145 (o) (970) 479 -2452 (f) (970) 376 -2675 (c) • Ever Vail It seems there are three basic considerations about an Ever Vail type of development: Connectivity —how does the project connect to Vail, pedestrian, vehicular. Is it a natural extension of the walking experience? If it requires transit to work, is the transit seamless? Will the project create traffic impacts on other parts of Vail? Continui"oes the configuration, character of buildings, etc. feel like a continuation of Vail? Is it important that the place have "Vail" qualities? If it is different than the rest of Vail, does that add variety to Vail, or detract from the whole? Competition — obviously we have to be sensitive to the market. Does this project meet a market need (likelihood of success)? Are there some out there that would come to Vail because of this project? Does it compete or take away from other parts of Vail? If this project is addressing an unmet need, is this the best way to meet it (or can the need be addressed by improvements to other parts of Vail)? In the end, will the residents and businesses here be isolated and dependent on internal patronage, or is it premised on the ability to attract patronage from other parts of Vail. If the latter, does it add variety or increase competition? Some other basic Questions 1. Do we really want to move the Frontage Road? At all? As much as proposed? (LH MP shows partial relocation. 2. Currently the proposal turns its back on the Freeway, and renders the Frontage Road just a parallel highway (as opposed to the "Boulevard" character anticipated elsewhere on the Frontage Road). Is there a way to buffer the Freeway so the Frontage Road is more appealing and can be a boulevard? 3. Much of the proposal is about parking for day skiers. Is it necessary to accommodate day skiers? A significant part of the cost, and density, may be to amortize the cost of day skier parking. 4. Can we really build that close to a sewer treatment plant without conflicts /odors? It does not appear practical to move the plant. Can the odors and appearance be adequately screened? Or will it remain an incompatibility? 5. Sandstone Creek is in a virtual concrete canyon in this proposal. While it may comply technically with the setback requirements, is that the character we want? Is that the best we can do for integrating the natural environment? 6. The plan for this area needs to consider more than just the current proposal —what other improvements are possible or desired? How will the Simba underpass work? What happens to the Andy Norris office property? Is there any infill potential to the east (Vail Spa etc.) 7. Is this proposal better than a more modest effort? (say, where not putting ski grooming equipment yard under the building ?) What do we gain, what do we give up? 8. Long -term vs. short-term participation —Is VRA going to have a long -term stake in this proposal? If so, it provides some insurance that they would make decisions that will lead to long -term success rather than a quick return on investment. If they are not keeping a long -term stake, the Town has an even greater interest in looking after the factors that will lead to long -term success. 9. What is the "public benefit" of the project? Not that a land owner doesn't have the right to develop for his /her own benefit, but there are some major obligations /concems (proximity to treatment plant, moving the Frontage Road, establishing a somewhat remote 'enclave', having another area of public maintenance and snow removal, etc.) that need to be justified by public benefit. • Another way of answering #9 above might be to answer the following two Questions: (W ❑ What problems is the Ever Vail Project solving? ❑ What problems /impacts is the Ever Vail creating? 1. Relieving congestion by providing another access point for ski school? 2. Providing needed parking for day skiers? Employees? 3. Providing a needed niche of post -ski activities and night life? 4. Convenience shopping that is lacking for LionsHead area? 5. Employee housing greater than demanded by the project itself? 6. Employment? 7. Hiding the mountain grooming equipment? Better gateway from the west? 8. Providing accommodations and/or lifestyle that is lacking in Vail? 9. Shifting day skiers away from congested portals? 10. Increasing the amount of day skiers, or total skiers? 11. • I*] ) Warren Campbell - Discussion summary to date From: Jeff Winston < jtwinston @winstonassociates.com> To: George Keele <ralfmagnet @aol.com >, Warren Campbell <WCampbell @vailgov.com> Date: 09/04/2008 11:02 AM Subject: Discussion summary to date Attachments: Ever Vail.doc George, Warren, Notes from our last meeting. I did some checking on sewer plant odors. There is better and better technology. Don't know how much is already in place today. Seems relatively expensive. Might be worth asking someone at the plant how much they're doing, what they might have to do, what others have done. Jeff Page 1 • • Q N N O O C 0 0 0 0 N F F O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 a N N N N In ti P �+ N OD Nf y O O O l M " O kn N N 0 h N M y W O V N N O O O O O O S � 0 0 0 0 0 0 N � r+1 11 f+1 O � N a R 7 X 7 7 V d U $ � � w C o � In Q 00 V V Q 1, M b y = I �a N H � a 9 rA w 1n O O 'n N O O w1 O O O 'D V O O N O1 h l� N to N N -� w 00 ^' p a N to In O, N Y H > W • �i W �r CI1 '..� O > �� •y 0 0 • f�' .0 � .� n' O N O N W � o p q d �F � ¢ W a� � a � W > o o d o o W p Q z a �33aC1U a �•, p F . y .- �a� a.¢t -x� Q k (09/10/2008) Warren Campbell - Ever Vail Estimate Page 1 From: Jeff Winston <jtwinston @winstonassociates.com> To: Warren Campbell <WCampbell @vailgov.com >, George Ruther <gruther @ci.vail Date: 09/10/2008 11:37 AM Subject: Ever Vail Estimate Attachments: EverVail FeeEst1.pdf CC: Jessica Brundage <jessica @winstonassociates.com> Warren, I think the attached fee estimate is consistent with our discussion last week. George said that what we're doing right now is NOT to be included in this estimate, which I have not. Correct? Since next Monday is out, potential meeting times: Tues AM the 16th (I have to be on the road to GJ by 12 ish. Monday the 22nd (any time). Jeff Winston 303.440.9200 c Ja 4%% S cAv i C. L.�-t y am. V�►nf me sea T� erw� . Taffucl��d a� g0.���cafon Cor�.rw§� a: O fA fte. e.�f��„ 0 0 � / oo aaJameo§ 000 _ $IDrEW) - ° G o � � oo§a 00000000 K cq r4 � W g m . _ 2 � ® � § - w §�� - ��2 oosaasas § Q Q�rM� mmm � n - -- % u . � � e � § 2 }a - - -- � j _k � ) � § $ 2\ /� § r4 m�� Q %0 -- ]Ina, a = § 2 § ©- � - )f}� - a - cn ■• ;co ©) k As ) ))§ @ �w�e �» »a§3 ° F. ��3 /k X24§§ / Page 1 of 2 Warren Campbell - EverVail (W From: Thomas Miller To: Date: 09/02/2008 2:47 PM Subject: EverVail CC: "Michael Brekka" , , 'Brian McCartney" , "Thomas Allender" , "Orla Bannan" , "Christopher Jarnot" , "Crystal Inge" , "Keith Fernandez" , "Beth Ganz", "Kelly Ladyga" , On behalf of Vail Resorts Development Company, Keith Fernandez, and our project consultants, I want to thank you for taking the time to join us recently at Donovan Pavilion to learn more about the proposed "EverVail" re- development project. As we continue to discuss our current plans and gather feed back about the re- development, we encourage you to continue to provide us with your candid comments and ideas. To provide feedback and view some updated project facts, please visit our website at www.evervail.com Please know that we took careful notes regarding all of your insightful comments at the meeting, and we hope that you'll continue to follow our progress because you will see many of your thoughts and careful consideration reflected in our plans. We have a long way to go before the project becomes a • reality; we hope that we can travel this path together with all the stakeholders including the Town, the Community, our Guests, and our Vail Resorts family. As I mentioned in my closing remarks at the community meeting, it is an honor to guide this project in a special place like Vail. There are two main components that make Vail special; the majestic environment that surrounds us and the people who make up our welcoming community. To ensure proper stewardship of the environment; we are building this project with the highest level of sustainable building standards, preserving our precious resources by using as much of the natural energy onsite as possible, and handling our waste (pre and post construction) with state -of -the art disposal practices. To ensure the stewardship of the community; we are providing a surplus of parking, a new portal to the mountain to alleviate congestion at the current portals, world -class restaurants and retail shops, over 80% of our employee housing requirement onsite, new hotel rooms and other "hot- beds," a new transportation and loading dock, and a brand new and improved south frontage road, all at no cost to the Town or residents. As we move towards another season of skiing and the associated bustle that comes with it, please take note of your experiences through the seasons and provide feedback whenever appropriate for ways in which we can use this new portal/village to enhance the overall experience of Vail for both the locals and the guests. Thank you again for coming and I hope to see you around town. Tom Thomas Miller file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \Administrator \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \48BD51... 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2 Director of Development Vail Resorts Development Company 137 Benchmark Road Avon, CO 81620 (o) 970 - 754 -2544 (m) 970 - 470 -1062 Tmiller1 @vailresorts.com www.evervaii.com www.snow.com A Do you really need to print this e -mail? The information contained in this message is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above, and may be privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender immediately, stating that you have received the message in error, then please delete this e-mail. Thank you. 0 n U file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \Administrator \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \48BD51... 09/04/2008 EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 846 Forest Road • Vail, Colorado 81657 (970) 476 -7480 • FAX (970) 476 -4089 August 28, 2008 Michael Brekka Vail Resorts Development Company 390 Interlocken Crescent Broomfield, CO 80021 RE: Ever Vail Drawings Dear Michael: Last week's Ever Vail open house was very informative. A great deal of detailed information was available in a short time. Thank you for organizing that presentation. One thing that caught our attention that is of concern is that the drawings that were presented did not identify the Vail Sewage Treatment plant accurately and consistently. On some drawings the plant was not labeled at all, on others it was labeled only with ERWSD, which is not very informative, and on at least one drawing it was labeled "Water Treatment Plant" which, of course, is misleading. Because of the unique character of our facility and its close proximity to the sites to be developed at Ever Vail, we believe full disclosure of the nature of our operation is essential for the protection of Vail Resorts, the Town of Vail and the District, even though our site is not included in the properties to be developed. We request that our site be shown and clearly labeled "Sewage Treatment Plant" on any drawings on which other uses are labeled. By copy of this letter to the Town of Vail staff we are informing them of this request, and we hope they will also require accurate and consistent labeling of our site in the development approval process. We often refer to our sewage treatment plants as wastewater treatment plants, but we are concerned this description could be misunderstood in this situation. We would also like to work with you to develop a mechanism to insure future purchasers in Ever Vail receive proper notice of the nature of our operations through a recorded document in the Eagle County property records. We would like all purchasers to acknowledge notice of our operations and agree to not make any claims against Vail Resorts, the Town of Vail or the District as a result of our operations. Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions on how we might insure proper notice to future Ever Vail owners. Sincerely, _ Dennis Gelvin, General Manager cc: Stan Zemler lov Matt Mire George Ruther WATER, WASTEWATER, OPERATIONS &MANAGEMENT SERVICES STATE OF COLOKADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Eagle Residency OT P.O. Box 298 714 Grand Avenue Eagle, Colorado 81631 (970) 328 -6385 June 19, 2008 Eva LaDow, P.E. FHWA Colorado Division 12300 W. Dakota Ave., Ste 180 Lakewood, CO 80228 RE: Disposal of Interstate 70 Right -of -Way in Vail for EverVail Project Dear Ms. LaDow: The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Region 3 has been working with the Town of Vail to evaluate the need for "excess" Interstate 70 Right -of -Way (ROW) within the Town of Vail limits. The Colorado Department of Transportation is not in favor of disposing of any ROW that may be needed for future expansion, yet similarly can find no justification for retaining ownership of © properties that will not be used for transportation uses. It is the position of CDOT that we should further investigate the disposal of approximately 4 acres of Interstate 70 ROW at approximately milepost 175.1 eastbound. Said disposal would be at fair market value and could generate upwards of approximately $12 Million to be used on other strategic projects. In addition to the revenues generated, CDOT believes that additional public benefit will be recognized by this disposal. These benefits include a newly constructed Frontage Road / US 6 that will be built to current standards, a uniform driver experience, and improved safety and mobility. The conclusion that this property will not be required for future transportation purposes is consistent with the final recommendation for the I -70 Mountain Corridor Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) that has a 25 -year planning horizon and 50 -year vision. The remaining ROW width is adequate to accommodate an additional standard travel lane (though not called for in the PEIS), shoulders, snow storage, and an advanced guide -way transit system. The Federal Highway Administration concurrence is requested to further investigate disposal of this particular piece of property. 0 Public Notice: +� Art in Public Places Board Meeting June 2, 2008 Town Council Chambers 8:30 a.m. Agenda: 1. Approve May AIPP Meeting Minutes 2. Citizen Input A rt 3. Ever Vail 25 minutes Tom Miller VRDC (e r f 4. Tannenbaum Festival 15 minutes Susie Tjossem 4 34 5. Meadow Drive Entry Feature 15 minutes o ( --r-v a ,M 6. Review of 2008 Budget 10 minutes 7. 2009 Budget 20 minutes 8. Town Council/DRB Reports 10 minutes 9. Adjournment L l�� ° � Q t,3 �d oiv- 4i-�l I St C Project No. 10104227 Ever Vail Vail, CO Stage 1 4/18/2008 �eVILO /1. u � �c n �saea Preliminary Review LEED for Neighborhood Development Pilot Version How to Interpret this report Purpose The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development Rating System was designed by the U.S. Green Building Council, Congress for the New Urbanism, and Natural Resources Defense Council, to encourage and facilitate the construction of sustainable development. The Preliminary Review of the project was evaluated according to this system and the Preliminary Rating is totaled below. Rating System Sections The report is organized into four categories defined in the LEED for Neighborhood Development rating system, including: Smart Location & Linkage, Neighborhood Pattern & Design, Green Construction & Technology, and Innovation & Design Process. LEED Prerequisites Prerequisites must be achieved. The report indicates where a prerequisite has not been fulfilled. These prerequisites should be addressed immediately by the project, as they are mandatory. LEED Credits Credits are based on desired performance goals. An assessment of whether the credit is anticipated, pending, or denied is made and a narrative describes the basis for the assessment. Anticipated 41 For those credits marked "Anticipated," the applicant has provided the completed credit Not All Prerequisites Anticipated template and associated information needed to demonstrate compliance. Therefore the achievement of the points is anticipated. Pending 40 For those credits marked "Pending," the applicant has not totally satisfied the mandatory Prerequisites Pending documentation, or the documentation is incomplete and point assessment cannot be made yet. Denied 0 For those credits marked "Denied," the applicant has applied for a credit but has either misinterpreted the credit or cannot substantiate meeting the requirements. The project has not demonstrated achievement of these credits. Rating No certification rating is made during the Preliminary Review. LEED -ND Certification Levels: Certified: 40 -49 Silver: 50 -59 Gold: 60 -79 Platinum: 80 -106 • Overview Crossing- cutting issues: Walking routes and distances are not documented as required, but instead are asserted to be in compliance for several prerequisites and credits because of the project's size. At a minimum, a map of walking routes and distances from the western -most corner to the eastern -most corner of the project must be provided for the sake of a documented record. Also, in several prerequisites and credits, Red Sandstone Creek is not being accounted for as previously undeveloped, and for being impacted by project construction. 1 of 10 D • n v M 0 m a � m D m CL (a a 1 2 L20 L 0 Smart Location & Linkage 30 Possible Points SLLp1 Smart Location, Option 1 The submittal package documents that 100% of the project boundary is adjacent to previously developed land (after excluding the waterfront portion of the perimeter). Staff inquiry via Google Earth confirmed status, but future mapping should clearly reflect the vicinity. Y r SLLp2 Proximity to Water and Wastewater Infrastructure, Option 1 The submittal package documents that the project is served by existing water and wastewater service. SLLp3 Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities The submittal package documents that no imperiled species or ecological communities are present, or likely to be present, on the site. Y j i SLLp4 Wetland and Water Body Conservation, Option 2 The submittal package documents the presence of Red Sandstone and Gore Creeks. However, the calculation of previously developed land within the project boundary includes the Red Sandstone Creek channel which is not previously developed. Street grid density is incorrectly calculated for Interstate 70 with multiple centerlines for individual travel lanes and ramps. The future relocated southern frontage road is also counted when it does not yet exist. Also, three structural crossings and adjacent improvements are impacting Red Sandstone Creek and its buffers, but no information is provided on the amount of impacted area, or compensation of equal or greater amount. • TECHNICAL ADVICE: Recalculate the amount of the project site that is previously developed after excluding the Red Sandstone Creek channel. Recalculate surrounding street grid density using one centerline for the Interstate 70 right -of -way (exclusive of ramps), and exclude the future relocation of the southern frontage road (refer to the "Street Grid Density & Centerlines" calculation document posted on the Pilot Resources website). Calculate the amount of Red Sandstone Creek and buffers that are impacted by the project improvements, and describe proposed on or off -site compensation of equal or greater amount. FY C _ SLLp5 Agricultural Land Conservation, Option 2 The submittal package documents that the project complies with SLLp1 Option 1. FY C SLLp6 Floodplain Avoidance, Option 2 The submittal package documents that the project is an infill site and will follow the NFIP requirements for any land within a 100 year floodplain. 2 �_ SLLc1 Brownfields Redevelopment The submittal package documents that a portion of the site is a designated brownfield, and that a Phase 2 assessment has been completed with proposed remediation measures to cleanup the site. SLLc2 High Priority Brownfields Redevelopment Not attempted. • 2of10 9 SLLc3 Preferred Locations • The submittal package documents that the project is an infill site, but it does not correctly document that it is a previously developed site, and it does not correctly calculate surrounding street grid density. TECHNICAL ADVICE: Calculate the amount of project site that is previously developed after excluding Red Sandstone Creek, and recalculate surrounding street grid density as noted above for SLLp4. SLLc4 Reduced Automobile Dependence, Options 1 and 3 For Option 1 the submittal package documents 130 transit rides per weekday, but does not provide the current locations of transit stops, nor the walking routes and distances from dwellings and businesses to the stops. For Option 3, the submittal package documents a car sharing program that meets the requirement, except for walking routes and distances. TECHNICAL ADVICE: Provide documentation of existing transit stop locations and walking routes and distances from dwellings and businesses to those stops. Provide walking route and distance information from dwellings and businesses to shared vehicle parking locations. Please note that a revised template is now available for download from the Pilot Resources webpage. SLLc5 Bicycle Network The submittal package documents bicycle parking equivalent to 33% of auto parking, but is unclear on the location of diverse uses in relation to the bike network, biking distances to those uses, and conformity of the bike network with rating system requirements. TECHNICAL ADVICE: • Confirm that diverse uses are located on the bike network; confirm the bike network's conformity with rating system requirements; and provide biking distances from dwellings and businesses to diverse uses. SLLc6 Housing and Jobs Proximity, Option 1 The submittal package documents that 46% of total square footage is residential, and that 261 pre - project jobs exist at the Arrabelle Resort at a distance of 0.4 miles. However, the submittal documentation shows the Arrabelle location to be a vacant parcel, while the Arrabelle's address in Vail is not the same vacant parcel, and it is unclear if the 261 jobs are year- round. Furthermore, it is unclear from documentation provided and the development table whether the residences have year -round occupants that would benefit from proximity to jobs. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Clarify the location of the Arrabelle Resort and the existence of 261 full time equivalent pre - project jobs at that location. Clarify the housing types included; if not occupied by year -round residents, such residences can not be inlcluded in credit calculations. SLLc7 School Proximity Not attempted. SLLc8 Steep Slope Protection Not attempted. SLLc9 Site Design for Habitat or Wetland Conservation, Option 2 The submittal package documents that the project is a previously developed site, but includes Red Sandstone Creek as previously developed, and commits to using native vegetation. TECHNICAL ADVICE: Provide a recalculation of previously developed land within the project after excluding Red Sandstone Creek. 3of10 � -1 • • SLLc10 Restoration of Habitats or Wetlands Not attempted. SLLc11 Conservation Management of Habitats or Wetlands, Option 2 The submittal package documents the presence of water bodies and commits to a 10 -year conservation management plan that meets the credit requirements, but there is no funding commitment and unclear protection of Red Sandstone Creek and its buffers from pedestrian crossing structures and adjacent improvements. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Provide a conservation management plan funding commitment that meets the required guarantee, and clarify the plan's measures for water body and buffer impacts described above. 4of10 D • n N O d 2 M D n (D a n a 20 11 0 Y Neighborhood Pattern & Design 39 Possible Points NPDp1 Open Community The submittal package documents that no gates will be present in the project. Y NPDp2 Compact Development The submittal package documents a residential density of 70.46 DU /acre and non - residential density of 4.33 FAR, with densities to be achieved when 50% of dwellings are built and /or within five years of first building occupancy. While it is unclear whether the trails and habitat restoration areas shown in the site plan were required by government or voluntarily donated, prerequisite compliance is anticipated. NPDc1 Compact Development The submittal package documents a residential density of 70.46 DU /acre and non - residential density of 4.33 FAR, with densities to be achieved when 50% of dwellings are built and /or within five years of first building occupancy. While it is unclear whether the trails and habitat restoration areas shown in the site plan were required by government or voluntarily donated, credits achievement is anticipated. NPDc2 Diversity of Uses The submittal package documents that 46% of total square footage is residential, but diverse uses are not located on the site plan, nor is walking route and distance information provided from dwellings to the diverse uses, and no timeframe is provided for diverse use presence. TECHNICAL ADVICE. is Provide the locations of the claimed 10 diverse uses, and walking route and distance information from those uses to dwellings, along with a timeframe for diverse use presence. For Stage 1 projects, it is sufficient to locate diverse uses according to a leasing recruitment plan (the results of which can be updated in later stages, per 3/18/08 NPDc2 CIR ruling). NPDc3 Diversity of Housing Types Not attempted. NPDc4 Affordable Rental Housing, Option 3 The submittal package documents that 15.48% of DUs will be priced at 50% of AMI, and that an additional 22.62% of DUs will be priced at 80% of AMI, with all pricing committed to be affordable for 15 years. NPDc5 Affordable For -Sale Housing, Option 1 The submittal package documents that 11.39% of dwellings will be priced for up to 80% of AMI. NPDc6 Reduced Parking Footprint The submittal package documents that the project has no surface parking lots, and that bicycle parking equivalent to 33% of auto parking will be provided within 200 yards of buildings served. 5of10 7 1 NPDc7 Walkable Streets • The submittal package documents the following according to credit subsections: a) Each building has a principal functional entry on a front fagade facing a public space. b) 100% of street frontages within the project have building height -to- street -width ratios that do not exceed 1:3. c) Continuous 4 -foot wide sidewalks are provided on both sides of all streets within the project. d) All streets along exclusively residential blocks are designed for a maximum speed of 20 mph. e) All streets along non - residential or mixed -use blocks are designed for a maximum speed of 25 mph. f) The front facades of 100% of buildings are no more than 25 feet from front property lines. C: LJ g) The front facades of 100% of buildings are no more than 18 feet from the front property line. h) The front facades of 100% of mixed -use and non - residential buildings are contiguous to the sidewalk. i) Functional building entries occur every 64 feet on average along non - residential or mixed - use blocks. j) All ground -level non - residential interior spaces facing a public space have transparent glass on at least 33% of their ground -level facades. k) No blank walls longer than 50 feet will occur along sidewalks. 1) All ground -level storefront windows will be kept open and visible at night in accordance with CC &R provisions. m) On- street parking is provided on 58.14% of both sides of new streets, which is below the minimum requirement of 70 %. n) Street trees will occur at average intervals of 33.40 feet, but the credit specifies they must occur at intervals no greater than 40 feet. o) 65.22% of ground -level dwellings will be a minimum 24 inches above the sidewalk. p) 100% of office buildings will have ground -floor retail accessible from a public space. q) Shading was checked as an attempted measure, but no data was provided in the template calculation boxes. Also, note that this requirement applies to all sidewalks, not just sidewalks adjacent to streets. TECHNICAL ADVICE: n) Confirm that street trees will occur at intervals no greater than 40 feet. q) Complete template calculation for shading of all sidewalks. NPDc8 Street Network Not attempted. NPDc9 Transit Facilities The submittal package documents that all on -site transit stops will be covered, partially enclosed, provided with a bench, illuminated in compliance with GCTc20, and posted with local transit information signage. 6of10 2 NPDc10 Transportation Demand Management, Options 2 and 3 • Under Option 2, the submittal package documents two public transit systems serving the project: a free municipal service, and a fare -based county system. Under Option 3, the project proposes a third on -site, developer- sponsored transit service to major destinations in Vail. The Option 2 subsidized county transit passes are not quantified by amount of subsidy. The Option 3 transit rides per weekday peak hours are not provided, and a more explicit guarantee of service operation at least two years beyond build -out is needed. TECHNICAL ADVICE. For Option 2, provide the amount of transit pass subsidy. For Option 3, provide the number of year -round weekday peak hour transit rides, and a clear guarantee of service operation at least two years beyond build -out. NPDc11 Access to Surrounding Vicinity The submittal package documents four new streets intersecting the project boundary, but does not include measurements of the full project perimeter (exclusive of Red Sandstone and Gore Creeks). Non - motorized rights -of -way that intersect the boundary are eligible for counting toward the distance interval. TECHNICAL ADVICE: After excluding Red Sandstone and Gore Creeks, remeasure the entire perimeter for distances between intersecting rights -of -way for all travel modes. Highlight allowable exclusions in the provided plan and narrative. NPDc12 Access to Public Spaces The submittal package documents two public plazas totaling 1.514 acres and averaging 0.755 acres each. However, submittal documentation shows structures occupying portions of both plazas; the length -to -width ratio has not been provided for the plazas; and walking route and distance information from dwellings and businesses to the plazas was not provided. • TECHNICAL ADVICE. Remeasure plaza areas to exclude structures; provide length -to -width ratios, and provide walking route and distance information. NPDc13 Access to Active Spaces, Option 1 The submittal package documents the presence of an on -site ski lift to an active open space, but does not provide walking route and distance information from dwellings and businesses to the ski lift, nor the acreage of the active open space. It is also unclear whether the on -site ski lift provides access to active open space year- round. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Provide walking route and distance from dwellings and businesses to the ski lift, and the acreage of the active open space being claimed. Achievement is also pending a CIR submitted to the LEED -ND Core Committee regarding ski -lift access to active open space. NPDc14 Universal Accessibility Not attempted. NPD05 Community Outreach and Involvement The submittal package documents an intention to comply with the credit requirements, but given the advanced details of project design is unclear how the first two requirements for pre - conceptual involvement have been satisfied. TECHNICAL ADVICE: Provide documentation of a meeting with immediate neighbors and local officials that occurred during pre - conceptual design; an open community meeting that occurred during conceptual design to solicit general public input; and design modifications made or rejected as a result of public input that occurred during conceptual design. NPDc16 Local Food Production Not attempted. 7of10 D m v 15 07 Green Construction & Technology 31 Possible Points =Y] C1 F GCTp1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention The submittal package documents that an erosion and sedimentation control plan will be created and implemented in conformance with the requirements. 3 F j GCTc1 LEED Certified Green Buildings, Option 2 The submittal package documents that 80% of project total square footage will be LEED- certified. 3 L GCTc2 Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Points Sought 3, Category 1 The submittal package documents a commitment to 20% energy reduction in 90% of project buildings. 2 GCTc3 Reduced Water Use, Option 1 The submittal package documents a commitment to 30% water savings in 90% of project buildings. GCTc4 Building Reuse and Adaptive Reuse Not attempted. GCTc5 Reuse of Historic Buildings Not attempted. 1 r GCTc6 Minimize Site Disturbance Through Site Design, Option 1 The submittal package documents the project site as 100% previously developed without • accounting for Red Sandstone Creek being previously undeveloped. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Recalculate the amount of previously developed land on -site consistent with technical advice provided for previous credits. 1 GCTc7 Minimize Site Disturbance During Construction, Option 1 The submittal package documents the project site as 100% previously developed without accounting for Red Sandstone Creek being previously undeveloped. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Recalculate the amount of previously developed land on -site consistent with technical advice provided for previous credits. L! GCTc8 Contaminant Reduction in Brownfields Remediation The submittal package documents achievement of SLLc1 and a commitment to cleanup methods that meet the credit requirements. However, it is unclear that any additional contamination found will be treated on -site using methods that meet the credit requirements. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Confirm that any additional contamination found will be treated using methods that meet the credit requirements. r 2 r GCTc9 Stormwater Management, June 2007 Version, Option 1 The submittal package documents a commitment to a comprehensive stormwater management plan, but the amount of rainfall to be managed is given as 1.25 inches in the template versus 0.45 inches in the accompanying engineering statement. TECHNICAL ADVICE: • Clarify the amount of rainfall to be managed on -site. Also, please note that a revised submittal template is available from the Pilot Resources website. 8of10 1 GCTc10 Heat Island Reduction, Option 2 The submittal package documents a commitment to use specified SRI values on roofs, but does not quantify the amount of roofing. Also, the location and amount of green roofs diagramed in the documentation does not match the green roofing shown in NPDc7 supplemental drawings. TECHNICAL ADVICE. Provide the percent of total roof area to receive SRI - compliant roofing, and clarify the location and amount of green roofs. GCTc11 Solar Orientation Not attempted. GCTc12 On -Site Energy Generation, Option 1 The submittal package documents an intention to develop on -site renewable power generation, which would automatically earn this credit. GCTc13 On -Site Renewable Energy Sources, Option 2 The submittal package documents an exploration of micro -hydro and wind power for providing 5% of the project's annual electrical and thermal energy needs. This is expressed in a letter that accompanies the template, but the template has been left blank. TECHNICAL ADVICE: Provide a completed template, and a written commitment to develop a renewable energy system that meets all credit requirements. 1 GCTc14 District Heating & Cooling The submittal package documents a commitment to develop a district heating and cooling system serving 100% of project square footage and 100% of total peak thermal load at efficiencies that comply with the requirement. O 1 GCTc15 Infrastructure Energy Efficiency The submittal package documents a commitment to reduce infrastructure energy use 15% below a baseline to be estimated. 1 GCTc16 Wastewater Management The submittal package documents a commitment to reuse 50% of wastewater on -site. 1 GCTc17 Recycled Content in Infrastructure The submittal package documents a commitment to recycled content in infrastructure materials that comply with the requirements. 1 GCTc18 Construction Waste Management The submittal package documents a commitment to developing a construction waste management plan, and to recycle at least 50% of demolition and construction debris. 1 GCTc19 Comprehensive Waste Management The submittal package documents a commitment to locating a hazardous waste drop -off station on -site that will be publicized; and to locating at least one general recycling station on- site, which will also be publicized. GCTc20 Light Pollution Reduction Not attempted. 0 E D n T a M � a � a � a 4 2 0 Innovation & Design Process 6 Possible Points IDPc1.1: I% for Community Art The submittal package proposes an innovation point for a public art program, but does not include a description of the quantifiable benefits of the credit proposal. TECHNICAL ADVICE: Provide a description of the quantifiable benefits of the proposal. Credit achievement is also pending a CIR submitted to the LEED -ND Core Committee regarding community art prorgram ID proposal. IDPc1.2: Free Community Bicycle Program The submittal package proposes an innovation point for a bicycle sharing program with notable environmental benefits. IDPc1.3: Sustainable Development Education The submittal package proposes an innovation point for a public education program IDPc1.4: M &V Plan for Residential /Commercial Energy Use The submittal package proposes an innovation point for measuring building energy use, but such building monitoring is addressed by GCTc1. TECHNICAL ADVICE. If desired, consider resubmitting a propsal for M &V plan adapted to the energy savings specific to LEED for Neighborhood Development (i.e. energy saving associated with SLLc4). O IDPc1.5: Exemplary Performance, GCTc1 The submittal package proposes an innovation point for doubling the amount of LEED- certified project square footage from 40% to 80 %, which constitutes exemplary practice with substantial environmental benefits. IDPc2 LEED Accredited Professional The submittal package documents a LEED- accredited professional on the project team. • 10 of 10 16 Planning January 2008 FILE COPY Characteristics of a Great Street • Provides orientation to its users, and connects well to the larger pattern of ways. • Balances the competing needs of the street — driving, transit, walking, cycling, servicing, parking, drop -offs, etc. • Nits the topography and capitalizes on natural features. A lined with a variety of interesting activities and uses that create a varied streetscape. 40 "as urban design or architectural fea- tures that are exemplary in design. elates well to its bordering use�— allows for continuous activity, doesn't displace pedestrians to provide access to bordering uses. 4 courages human contact and social activities. • employs hardscape and /or landscape to great effect. • Promotes safety of pedestrians and vehicles and promotes use over the yy 24 -hour day. • )' omotes sustainability through mini - ' mizing runoff, reusing water, ensuring groundwater quality, minimizing heat islands, and responding to climatic demands. •)s well maintained, and capable of being maintained without excessive costs. N . a memorable character. St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans (top); Ocean Drive, Miami Beach; opposite: South Temple Street, Salt Lake City; 125th Street, New York