Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB12-0282 - CR1 - TRANSMITTAL PACKETDepartment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VA1L '` ' Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 - 479 -2128 www.vailgov.com vDevelopment Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Revision Submittals: 1. "Field Set" of approved plans MUST accompany revisions. 2. No further inspections will be performed until the revisions are approved & the permit is re- issued. 3. Fees for reviewing revisions are $55.00 per hour (2 hour minimum), and are due upon issuance. Permit # s) information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions (KResponse to Correction Letter 1 1`L" 07�Z d,4 it 7'j ►J _attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal ( ) Other Project Street Address: 1qFr°_ !6�,ZIW6 g/cL ZArJi_ (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Contractor Information Business Name: C ey4:9- Business Address: Zy.S 21v6'2 PAw4;-1 PDP9n City 1_DkvArZP5 State: CO Zip: g/63Z- Contact Name: Tuz- dk� &A— Contact Phone: Contact E -Mail: /�ia�YUS7�eU or✓Q(�°mflit� �Q✓1, 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoni and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, Intemati Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of Iicable thereto. X Applicant Information j Applicant Name: Applicant Phone: Applicant E -Mail: For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: Received From: Cash Check # _ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Signature (Required) exp. date: I--— — Description / List of Changes: n mq west Coccecf� ors i (use additional sheet if necessary) `Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor & Materials) I (DO NOT include original valuation) Building: $ III Plumbing: $ Electrical: $ 10 Mechanical: $ Total: $ Date Received: o��c�ad�D AUG 06 2012 Wc,q:ab TOWN OF VAIL p [ECG CWCE AUG 0 6 2012 We tsn TOWN OF VAIL Martin A. Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: 1498 Spring Hill Lane, B12 -0282 Andrew James Abraham, AIA 970.376.2575 andrew@aja-studio.com Dear Mr. Haeberle: In response to your letter dated July 18, 2012, I've added the following notes to my Cover Sheet, A0.0, for the above project. These notes are listed under Permit Set Revisions and clouded in the middle of the drawing. As discussed with you, in an effort to preserve resources these notes would not appear on any other drawings. PERMIT SET REVISIONS: 1: Windows: All relocated or new windows to comply with current energy code requirements to include NFRC label indicating a maximum 0.35 U value. See 1101. 4.3 IECC. In case of conflict with other window notes in drawings, this note to be followed without exception. 2: Lighting. Fifty percent (50 %) of new lighting shall be high efficacy lighting. See 404.1 IECC. Owner to review and approve all new lighting prior to installation. 3: Detectors: Provide Carbon Monoxide Detectors on all floors. Verify with code and Governing Authority height and locations at stairwell landing / hall on each floor. All other Building Comments to be addressed by other professionals and have been discussed with the Contractor, Peter Geyer. Thank you for your teamwork on this project and please contact me if you need additional Architectural information. Sincerely, Andrew James Abraham, AIA AJA Studio: President /Architect Cc: Peter Geyer a virtual studs TOWN OF 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 vailgov.com Date: July 18, 2012 Re: 1498 Spring Hill Lane B12 -0282 Dear Mr. Geyer RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS Community Development Department 970.479.2138 970.479.2452 fax • Submit three complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified. • Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each comment. BUILDING COMMENTS Architectural Comments: Sheet A2.1 1. Windows proposed to be relocated shall be required to comply with current energy code requirements to include a NFRC label indicating a maximum .35 u value. Reference section 101.4.3 IECC. Revise general notes 2. Fifty percent of new lighting shall have to be high efficacy lighting. Reference section 404.1 IECC. Annotate on plans 3. Carbon Monoxide detectors required to be installed throughout. Annotate on plans Structural Comments: Reviewed and accepted Plumbing Comments: Please clarify if elevator is to be electric or hydraulic operated. If hydraulic a elevator pit drain shall be required. Show on plans Mechanical Comments: 1. Provide equipment plans and location for elevator equipment Electrical Comments: 1. Provide electrical plans and load calculations showing proposed additional loads as well as location of equipment, as referenced in architectural plans. PLANNING COMMENTS Reviewed and accepted FIRE COMMENTS See Building comments PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS NA Sincerely, Martin A. Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail Page2 Lid ' � ► V9 h AUG o 6 2012 TOWN OF VAIL 763* J Pi`fst0§QgqRb�d W p 1312 -0282 Community Development Department Vail, Colorado 81657 970.479.2138 vailgov.com 970.479.2452 fax Dear Mr. Geyer • Submit three complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested information with all plan revision items clouded or otherwise identified. • Please respond in writing to each comment with a response letter addressing each comment. 1 •Illl "1 1. Windows proposed to be relocated shall be required to comply with current energy code requirements to include a NFRC label indicating a maximum .35 u value. Reference section 101.4.3 IECC. Revise general notes 2. Fifty percent of new lighting shall have to be high efficacy lighting. Reference section 404.1 IECC. Annotate on plans 3. Carbon Monoxide detectors required to be installed throughout. Annotate on plans My understanding is that you spoke today (7/23) with my architect (Andrew Abraham) and that you have agreed that he will provide a letter and cover sheets that address all three of the above items. Structural Comments: Reviewed and accepted Plumbing Comments: Please clarify if elevator is to be electric or hydraulic operated. If hydraulic a elevator pit drain shall be required. Show on plans The elevator is electric. Attached to this are three copies of the mechanical /electrical details supplied by the elevator company. Mechanical Comments: 1. Provide equipment plans and location for elevator equipment See response to comment above and attached diagrams. 1. Provide electrical plans and load calculations showing proposed additional loads as well as location of equipment, as referenced in architectural plans. We are contacting the electrician who is going to provide the load calculations and electrical plans. All of locations except for overhead lighting are on the original submitted plans. David Rhoades indicated that the electrician can draw in the 4 overhead cans on his submitted plans /calculations PLANNING COMMENTS Reviewed and accepted FIRE COMMENTS See Building comments d•N • Sincerely, Martin A. Haeberle Chief Building Official Town of Vail Page2 Typical Counterweight Chain Drive Unit Area Construction Details: 2 pole 115V car light service switch Drive Unit • moo ;►�a�����llllll�pl���l ..� I . Electrical Controller � 1 Rail Tower Drive Motor Section Through Top of Hoistway 2 pole 230V elevator controller and drive service switch 7 . -11 .. Uninterruptal Power Supp �JOa`uaOflO�a I / Unit O'�19V ?i IgOVE ' 'T' . 71 ii { t If the elevator controller is installed in a remote machine room, these items are to be provided in the machine room, near the controller. Construction Notes: • Minimum overhead clearance for standard car is 9' -0" above the top landing finished floor. • Light, light switch, receptacle, incoming electrical circuits and telephone jack to be located within 6' /2" of the hoistway door wall to avoid interference with wiring raceway (or may be located in ceiling). Page 11 Ptarmigan Electric, Inc. PO Box 2674 Edwards, CO 81632 Phone (970) 376 -1846 ptarmiganelectric @comcast.net Kaufman Load Calculation General Lighting (3509 sq. ft. x 3 VA /sq. ft.) 10,527 VA Small Appliance 3000 VA Laundry 1500 VA Total 15,027 VA 3000 VA at 100% 3000 VA 12,027 VA at 35% 4209 VA Total 7209 VA at 100% 7209 VA Cooking Appliances Cooktop 5000 VA Oven 8000 VA Total 13,000 VA at 65% 8450 VA Other Appliances Refrigerator 1 1500 VA Refrigerator 2 1500 VA Microwave 1200 VA Dishwasher 1200 VA Disposal 700 VA Heat Tape 4000 VA Sauna 5000 VA Hot Tub 8000 VA Elevator 5000 VA Total 28,100 VA at 75% 21,075 VA Toe Space Heaters 3000 VA at 100% 3000 VA Total 39,734 VA 39,734 VA /240 V = 165 A (200 A Service) EMLab P &K A TestAmerica Company Report for: Russ Folger DS Consulting, Inc. 5366 Flatrock Ct. Morrison, CO 80465 Regarding: Project: 1498 Spring Hill Ln EML ID: 948971 Approved by: Approved Signatory Andrea Robarge Dates of Analysis: Asbestos -EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116: 07 -24 -2012 Service SOPs: Asbestos -EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116 (EPA- 600/M4 -82 -020 (SOP 01267)) All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data can be provided when requested. EMLab P &K ( "the Company ") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor. Document Number: 200091 - Revision Number: 5 EMLab P &K, LLC EMLab ID: 948971, Page 1 of 2 EMLab P &K 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002 (800) 651 -4802 Fax (623) 780 -7695 www.emlab.com Client: DS Consulting, Inc. Date of Sampling: 07 -23 -2012 C /O: Russ Folger Date of Receipt: 07 -24 -2012 Re: 1498 Spring Hill Ln Date of Report: 07 -24 -2012 ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA- 600/M4 -82 -020 & EPA METHOD 600/R -93 -116 Total Samples Submitted: 3 Total Samples Analysed: 3 Total Samples with Laver Asbestos Content> 1 %: 0 Location: DWI -1, BR Upstairs East Wall Lab ID- Version$: 4228439 -1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Joint Compound ND Cream Tape ND White Texture ND Off -White Paint ND Composite Non - Asbestos Fibrous Content: 10% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate Location: DW1 -2, BR Main Level East Wall Lab ID- Version$: 4228440 -1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Drywall with Brown Paper ND White Joint Compound ND Cream Tape ND White Texture ND Off -White Paint ND Composite Non - Asbestos Fibrous Content: 15% Cellulose < 1% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate Location: DW1 -3, BR Upstairs East Wall Lab ID- Versiont: 4228441 -1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Drywall with Brown Paper ND White Joint Compound ND Cream Tape ND White Texture ND Off -White Paint ND Composite Non - Asbestos Fibrous Content: 15% Cellulose < 1% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P &K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. t A "Version" indicated by - "x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x ". EMLab P &K, LLC EMLab ID: 948971, Page 2 of 2 '�Consult" F? ing Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report 1498 Spring Hill Ln, Vail, Colorado 81657 Presented To: Dr. Andrew Kaufman Homeowner 1498 Spring Hill Ln Vail, CO 81567 Performed & Prepared By: Mr. Russell Folger DS Consulting, Inc. PO Box 6864 Avon,CO 81620 (303) 378 -1544 Project Details: Project Number: 6144 Conducted: July 23, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Scope of Work 3.0 Site Description 4.0 Certifications 5.0 Inspection, Sampling & Analytical Procedures 5.1 Inspection Procedures 5.2 Sampling Procedures 5.3 Analytical Procedures 6.0 Homogeneous Areas 6.1 Material Friability 6.2 Material Classifications 6.3 Material Conditions 6.4 Sample Quantities 7.0 Overview of Findings 8.0 Conclusion & Recommendations 9.0 Asbestos Abatement & Demolition Requirements 10.0 Major Asbestos Spill Response 11.0 Disclaimer & Limitations APPENDIX A Inspector & Firm Asbestos Certificates APPENDIX B Analytical Data 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction On July 23, 2012, Mr. Russell Folger with DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) conducted a limited asbestos inspection and collected asbestos bulk- samples of suspect asbestos - containing materials (ACM) within a portion of the single - family residence located at 1498 Spring Hill Ln, Vail, Colorado. The purpose of the limited inspection was to identify and sample potentially hazardous friable and non - friable ACM that may be impacted by construction activities in order to install an elevator into the home. 2.0 Scope of Work The scope of the limited inspection and bulk - sampling was limited to specific areas of the residence that would be impacted by the installation of the elevator. The remaining areas within the residence, garage or any out - building on the property were not included in the scope of the inspection. The limited asbestos inspection did not constitute a full building inspection and does not fulfill the asbestos inspection requirements for structures that are to be demolished. 3.0 Site Description The residence is a wood - framed, single- family residence. 4.0 Certifications The limited asbestos inspection and bulk - sampling was conducted by Mr. Russell Folger with DSC. DSC is a Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment ( CDPHE) certified Asbestos Consulting Firm, Registration No. 14912. Mr. Folger is a CDPHE certified Building Inspector; having certification number 19360 (see Appendix A for certificates). 5.0 Inspection, Sampling & Analytical Procedures 5.1 Inspection Procedures The limited asbestos inspection was conducted by an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and CDPHE certified Building Inspector. The inspection procedures included identifying and sampling suspect ACM within the pre- defined areas, submitting samples to an accredited laboratory for analysis, classifying the materials and assessing their condition, and compiling a final report detailing the inspection and the analytical results of the bulk - samples. 5.2 Sampling Procedures Statistically random bulk - samples representative of the suspect ACM of each homogeneous area were collected according to the guidelines published as EPA Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 USC, Sections 2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 763 and CDPHE Regulation Number 8, Part B - Asbestos (Reg. 8). DSC has collected the appropriate number of bulk - samples to meet all regulatory requirements for the classification and quantity of each homogeneous area. Some minor destructive sampling was conducted; however, walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not broken into in order to locate 3 and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be located in these and other inaccessible areas. Materials containing less than 1% asbestos are not regulated by CDPHE Regulation 8, Part B - Asbestos. However, all demolition /abatement activities should be performed following the applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. This would include, but not limited to, the appropriate asbestos training for the type of material being removed /disturbed as well as having a properly trained supervisor onsite, using wet removal methods, wearing adequate personal protective equipment (HEPA- filtered particulate respirators), medical surveillance of workers, personal- exposure air monitoring, area air monitoring in occupied buildings, etc. There may also be landfill disposal requirements for these materials, depending on the facility. DSC recommends that all demolition /renovation areas involving any amount of asbestos be subjected to visual inspections and a final clearance air testing by a CDPHE- certified Air Monitoring Specialist (AMS) after the work has been completed, but before any containments are dismantled and the area is reoccupied. 5.3 Analytical Procedures All asbestos bulk - samples were analyzed by a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for asbestos content (see Appendix B for laboratory report). The percentage of asbestos within each individual bulk - sample can vary depending on sample location, homogeneity of the material, and the type of application. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered positive for asbestos greater than 1% unless it is re- analyzed utilizing the point -count method and verified to be less than 1 %. 6.0 Homogeneous Areas A Homogeneous Area (HA) includes materials that are uniform in appearance, color, texture and date of application. The asbestos content of the bulk- samples collected within a homogeneous area can be applied to the entire homogenous area if they conform to the above characteristics and the regulated minimum sample quantities of each type of material are collected and analyzed. 6.1 Material Friability A material can either be friable or non friable. A friable material is one that, when dry, can be pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, a non - friable material cannot. A non - friable material may become friable if its condition had deteriorated or has been impacted by forces that have rendered it friable. 6.2 Material Classifications Sampled materials are divided into one of the following three categories: • Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building members • Thermal System Insulation (TSI): any type of pipe, boiler, tank, or duct insulation • Miscellaneous Material: all other materials not classified in the above two categories 6.3 Material Conditions Sampled materials are placed into one of the three following categories of conditions: • Good: none to very little visible damage or deterioration 4 Damaged: the surface is crumbling, blistered, water - stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one -tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed, or one - quarter if the damage is localized Significantly Damaged: the surface is crumbling, blistered, water - stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over greater than one -tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed, or one - quarter if the damage is localized 6.4 Sample Quantities DSC collected at least the minimum number of samples from each homogeneous area necessary to meet all regulatory requirements for the quantity of material to be disturbed. The quantities listed in this report are approximate and on -site verification of the exact quantity of each material is required. The following outlines the minimum sample quantities required per homogeneous area: Surfacing Materials: up to 1,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of three (3) samples; between 1,000 ft2 and 5,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of five (5) samples; over 5,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of seven (7) samples; one (1) sample of each patch Thermal System Insulation (TSI): each homogeneous area requires a minimum of three (3) samples; at least one (1) sample must be collected from each patch; and collect enough samples sufficient to adequately assess the material and determine the asbestos content for TSI fittings such as pipe elbows or T's. Miscellaneous Materials: collect enough samples sufficient to determine the asbestos content 7.0 Overview of Findings Asbestos was not reported within any of the bulk - samples collected and analyzed. DSC collected a total of three (3) asbestos bulk - samples from one (1) homogeneous area. Table 1 below describes the materials composing each homogeneous area as well as the locations of each bulk - sample collected. Also listed is the classification, condition, friability and estimated quantity of material to be removed and /or disturbed, as well as the asbestos content within each bulk - sample. Please see Appendix B: Analytical Data for the layer break -down of each bulk- sample. I 1.11311991 HA Sample Material Sample Material Material Estimated Material Asbestos # ID Description Location Classification Condition Quantity Friability Content DW1 -1 Off- White, Medium Orange Peel Drywall Texture Bedroom Upstairs East Wall SM G 150 sqft Friable ND 1 DW1 -2 Off- White, Medium Orange Main Level Dining Room East SM G 150 sqft Friable ND Peel Drywall Texture Wall DW1 -3 Off- White, Medium Orange Peel Drywall Texture Bedroom Upstairs East Wall SM G 150 sqft Friable ND HA - Homogeneous Area ND - None - detect TR - Trace, <1% Visual Estimate G - Good D - Damaged SD - Significantly Damaged CHRY - Chrysotile SM - Surfacing Material ACT - Actinolite MM - Miscellaneous Material TSI - Thermal System Insulation 8.0 Conclusion & Recommendations ACM was not identified within the areas of the residence that were within the scope of the limited inspection and bulk - sampling performed on July 23, 2012; therefore, no professional abatement activities are required to remove or disturb the above - referenced sampled materials. 9.0 Asbestos Abatement & Demolition Requirements If ACM is to be removed or disturbed in a single - family residence, and the total quantity exceeds any of the regulatory trigger levels of 50 linear ft. on pipes, 32 ftz on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55- gallon drum, a CDPHE- certified General Abatement Contractor (GAC) is required to perform the work. The regulatory trigger levels within a commercial building are 260 linear ft. on pipes, 160 ftz on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55- gallon drum. In addition, formal notification to CDPHE prior to the abatement of ACM as well as air monitoring, visual inspections, and final air clearances by a CDPHE- certified Asbestos AMS is required. DSC can provide the client or building owner with a proposal for project design, abatement oversight and air monitoring upon request. CDPHE regulations allow for the demolition of a building that contains non - friable asbestos - containing materials, such as caulking, mastic or resilient floor tiles. However, demolition must be completed without causing the non - friable ACM to be rendered friable. Burning a building with any ACM is prohibited. Operations such as sanding, cutting, crushing, grinding, pneumatic jacking, etc. of ACM are not permitted. Recycling of building materials such as concrete, metal, or wood that are bonded or contaminated with ACM, e.g. glue, caulking, or mastic is also prohibited. If any of the non - friable asbestos containing materials are to be recycled and rendered friable after demolition (i.e. crushing mastic - coated concrete), these materials must be abated of all ACM prior to shipping offsite for recycling. OSHA regulations regarding occupational exposure during demolition activities is still mandatory. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires that workers performing construction - related activities be protected from asbestos fibers in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 0.1 f /cc of air. Contractors are must comply with applicable provisions of OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 during demolition and renovation activities. These OSHA provisions include, but are not limited to, PPE and respirators, personnel training, personal - exposure air monitoring, employee medical surveillance, wet removal methods, signage for regulated areas, etc. 10.0 Major Asbestos Spill Response If ACM is significantly damaged and the total quantity exceeds the regulatory trigger levels, the area is deemed a "Major Asbestos Spill." The area is consequently subject to the requirements in Reg. 8, Section III.T.1. -Major Asbestos Spills, as outlined below. Additional asbestos air or dust sampling should also be conducted within the remaining areas not directly impacted by the Major Asbestos Spill to determine if asbestos - containing dust /debris has spread to adjacent areas. If asbestos fibers are found within any other areas or on building contents, they should be included in the scope of professional abatement and decontamination. The following response actions must be followed per Colorado Reg. 8 when a Major Asbestos Spill occurs: • Restrict access to the area and post warning signs to prevent entry to the area by persons other than those necessary to respond to the incident. • Shut off or temporarily modify the air handling system to prevent the distribution of asbestos fibers to other areas. • Immediately contact the Division by telephone, submit a notification in compliance with subsection III.E. (Notifications) and, if in an area of public access, apply for a permit in accordance with subsection III.G. (Permits). • Be exempted from the requirements to have a certified Supervisor on -site at all times, until such time as the immediate danger has passed. Any cleanup or asbestos abatement that must occur after the immediate danger has passed shall be supervised by a person certified by the Division. • Using certified Supervisors and certified Workers in accordance with section II. (Certification Requirements) of this Regulation, seal all openings between the contaminated and uncontaminated areas and establish none - detect air pressure within the contaminated area in accordance with paragraph III.J. (Air Cleaning and None - detect Pressure Requirements). This is to be accomplished using polyethylene sheeting to cover areas such as doorways, windows, elevator openings, corridor entrances, grills, drains, grates, diffusers and skylights. • HEPA vacuum or steam clean all carpets, drapes, upholstery, and other non - clothing fabrics in the contaminated area, or discard these materials. • Launder or discard contaminated clothing in accordance with subsection III.R. (Waste Handling). • HEPA vacuum or wet clean all surfaces in the contaminated area. • Discard all materials in accordance with subsection III.R. (Waste Handling). • Following completion of subparagraph III.T.1.a. through III.T.1.i. above, comply with air monitoring requirements as described in subsection III.P. (Clearing Abatement Projects); air samples shall be collected aggressively as described in 40 C.F.R. Part 763, Appendix A to Subpart E (EPA 1995), except that the air stream of the leaf blower shall not be directed at any friable ACM that remains in the area and • Comply with any other measures deemed necessary by the Division to protect public health. 11.0 Disclaimer & Limitations The activities outlined in this report were conducted in a manner consistent with a level of care and expertise exercised by members of the environmental consulting and industrial hygiene profession. All activities were performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations as well as generally accepted standards and professional practice. No warranty is either expressed or implied. DSC assumes no responsibility or liability for error in public information utilized, statements from sources other than DSC, or developments resulting from situations outside the scope of this project. The details provided within this report outline the inspection activities on the date(s) indicated and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date, the limited number of bulk- samples collected, and the laboratory results of those bulk - samples. The laboratory results contained in this report apply specifically to the materials in which bulk- samples were collected. The results do not include or apply to any other materials within the structure that were not sampled, but may contain asbestos; including materials that may be hidden or inaccessible. Additional inspection and bulk - sampling activities would be required to determine if any other materials contain asbestos. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by the Client, with specific application to their project as discussed in the scope of work. The results of any surfacing material indicated in this report also includes any associated overspray of that material, e.g., under carpet, above suspended ceilings, etc. The information contained in this report is intended as supplementary material for abatement design and is not to be used as the scope of work for abatement activities, bidding or billing purposes. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. DSC can provide a full scope of work for 8 abatement upon request. DSC does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. 0 APPENDIX INSPECTOR & FIRM ASBESTOS CERTIFICATES 10 ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION* Colorado Department of public Health and Fin, immne* Air Pollution Control Division I lo, vertiricg that Russell J. Folger ( "Iffi—ti on No: 1934W has met the requirements of 25-7-507, C.R.S. and Air Quality Control 0mranission Regulation Na 8, Pan K and is hereby certified by the some of Colorado in the following discipline: 1—d: 4,70,1012 Building Inspector* STATE OF COLORADO ASBESTOS CONSULTING FIRM 4,10rado Department 4 Public l-lealth and Environment Air Pollution C-01 Division �1(11-1 'I his cenifies that DS Consulting, IDC- Regi,tration No. Aff - 14912 ilte Air QL1314V C011tr0l has met the rvy'i'ttalim' —It'i'emcot, w C 1, S -Irld Commission RcynUim, No S. Pint ji. and is licreh) authorized 1,) Pefl'01111 aih"Os consulting activities as rej,11trej] till(Icl Kc,-,ulatitm No S. Part H. in the state of Colorado. ls,sued: January 30. 2012 Expires: JanuaD 30, 201 3 M— 2 I W APCD P—�" SEAL 11 APPENDIX B ANALYTICAL DATA 12