HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 TRACT D EAGLE RIVER SANITION DISTRICT 1982 TO 1994 PART 1 OF 3 LEGAL*ign Review Action FCn
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
Project Name:
Building Name:
/i
Owner, Address and Phone: s
Architecvcontact,AddressandPhone: C on-l, rlr, /. / lo'- "-'/
( n -/r r. /*.,,i,'f,,.,'.r. 0,.-t/f, , 7t? /(={r: /7C*.
Legal Description: Lot
-
Block- Subdivision Zone District
proiecrstreetAdar"u, l1,,,fr l,/, a{ z 7 7 7, 7"i 't7,, 7/7/ Lf ,n c flr
comments: '-)ltil
/r' o)r I tnn'"1..+ trrr'/,,r^ ,, J .-.A ,',, . , To.,"o.,
a,,"n_ olon? /,rn",. frrrt ln .r;I/a * 1",ohn.-, /ru, .,
r't^ , , al
Motion by:
Board / Staff Action
Vote:
Seconded by:
! Approval
! Disapproval
tldaff Approval
Conditions:
t 7r , nu./,C t Pt 1pr.
bt / '';
-t
t.vLs6A 7 /74 / 94
DESIGN REVTEW BOARD APPIJICATION - TOWN OF
DATE RECETVED:
VAIL, COIJORADO
R[C'0AU0 I ,1994
DATE OF DRB MEETING:**********
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS TTAY NOT BE SCHEDUIJED EOR REVIEW.
:t!tlt*******
PROJECT INFORIIIATION :I.
A DESCRTPTION:
B. TYPE OF REVTEW:
New Construction (g200.OOl X uinor Alterat.ion ($20.00)Addirion ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
c.
D.
ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Subdivision
If property is described by descript.ion, please provi-de
to this application.
ZONING: dcS ,;J ",'-I, I
a meets and bounds
on a separate sheet
legal
and attach
E.
F.
G.
NAME OF APPLICANT : Lt t)PErL k-Rt-t F r,tr Mailing Address:. TalL f<>t..51 /(cy-,-.1
\sh,.l
NAME OF
Mailing
APPLTCANT' S REPRESENTATIVE :
Address:
Phone
=r-;'4,-
q.)7 - ry//^/
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
ONE YF.AR AFTER FINAI
ISSUED NiID CONSTRUCTION
H. NAME OF OWNER(S):
Mai-1ing Address:
/ (-, f-
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOT'T OWNER'S SIGNATT]RE
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are to be paid at Lhe
Lime of submit.tal of the DRB applilation. Later, when applying for a building permit, please identify the accurate vaLuation of Lhe proposal . The Town of Vait will adjusL the fee according to the table beLow, Lo ensure the correcE fee is paid.
'/t ,c/
owNER(S) SIGNATURE: ,'/f , ' "i'o fA 1,. 1,
I.
.1 .
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
,h a\ ,t . n ^^^|P v g Lv,t/t/u
$ ro,00r. $ s0,000
$ so, oo1 - $ 1so, ooo
$1s0, 001 - $ s00, 000
$s00,001 - $1,000,000 $ over 91, 000, 000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAI, EXPIRES
APPROVAIJ IJNIJESS A BUIIJDING PERMIT IS IS STARTED.
Phone
\
t
rT. PRE-APPIJICATT MEETING:
A pre-application meeting with a member of the planning
staff is encouraged to determine if any additional-application j-nformation is needed. It is the applicant's responsibj-lity to make an appoinlment wj-th t.he sLaff to
determine if there are additional submittal requirements.
Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamline the
review process for your project.
III. IMPORTAIII1T NOTICE REGARDING AI,TII SUBMISSTONS TO THE DRB:
A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate property 1ines, building lines and building corners. A11 trees to be removed must be taped, AII site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the
DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that sEaki-ng
done during the winter is not buried by snow.
B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires
Lwo separaLe meetings of Lhe Design Review Board: a
conceptual review and a final review,c 3::li"3l':":* ::i:.:?.3nfl33i'13'3Ii.'3iuTi:"f;"1:"i:I
asked in advance thaL discussion on Lheir item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB
agenda until such time as the it.em has been
republished.
D. The f oll-owing items may, aL t.he discretion of the
zoning' administrator, be approved by the Community
DevelopmenL DeparLment staff (i.e. a formal- hearing before Lhe DRB may not be required) :
a. Windows, skylights and simiLar ext.erior changes which do not aller the existinq plane of the building; and.
b. Bui-Iding additions not vi-sible from any other lot or public space. AL the t.ime such a proposaf is
submi-tted, applicanLs must include letLers from
adjacenL property owners and/or from the agenL for or manager of any adjacenL condominium associaLion staLing Lhe associaLion approves of the addition.
E. If a properLy is localed in a mapped hazard area (i.e.
snow avalanche, rockfalI, flood plain, debri-s flow,wetland, eLc.), a hazard study must be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard reporL prior Lo Lhe issuance of a building permit.
Applicanls are encouraged to check wiLh a Town Planner prior Lo DRB application to determine the relationship of the properLy Lo all mapped hazards.
F. For all residential const.ruction:
a. Clearly indicaLe on the ffoor plans Lhe inside face of Lhe exterior structural walls of the building; and
b. Indrcale wrLh a dashed ]ine on the siLe plan a four foot distance from the exterior face of the
building wa11s or supporting columns.
c. If DRB approves t.he application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be
addressed prior to Lhe application for a building
perm1 t. .
T\7
Three copies of a recent topographic survey, stamped by
a Colorado Professional Licensed Surveyor, at a scale
of l-" = 20' or larger, on which the following information is provided:
Lot area, and buildable area when different than loL area .
L,,egal description and physical address
Two. fooL contour intervals unless the parcel
consisLs of 6 acres or more, in which case, 5'
conLour intervals may be accepted.
Existing Lrees or groups of trees having trunks
wit.h diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a point one foot above grade.
Rock ouEcroppings and other significant natural
feaLures (1arge boulders, intermittent streams,
eEc. ) .
6. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.),
cenEerline of streams or creeks, required creek or
sEream setback, and 100-year flood plain, if applicable. Slopes of 40t or more shall be clearly delineated by cross hatching.
'7. Ties to exisLing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information must be clearly stated on the survey so that all measurements are
based on the same starting point. Thj.s is particularly important for determining building height and driveway slope. See Policy On Survey InformaLion, for more information regarding
<llr\t6\r<
8. I-,ocations of the f ollowinq must be shown:
e. Size and fvne of
etc.
b. Exact location of
lines from their
'i nn'l rrrl i nrr.
drainage culverts, swales,
existing utility service source to the s tructure,
Cable TV
Telephone
Sewer
Water
\-rct |i
El ectric
c. A11 utility meter locations, i-ncluding any pedesLals Lo be located on site or in Lhe righr-of-way adjacent. to the site.
d. ProperLy lines - distances and bearings and a basis of bearing.
e. IndicaLe all easements identified on the subdivision D1at.
9. Provide spoL elevaLions at the edgre of asphalc,
along the street. frontage of the property at.
t.wenty-t]-ve fooL interval-s (25'), and a minimum of
one spot elevation on either side of the 1ot.
Site PIan
1. Locations of t.he followino must be shown:
a. Exist,ing and finished grades.
b. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
D.
..Oproposed d.riveway, in"rlrfrq percent slope
and spot elewations at the property line,garage slab and as necessary along the centerline of the drive t.o accurat.elv reflect driveway grade.
d. A 4', concreLe drive pan at the edge of asphalt for driveways that exit the street in
an uphill direction.
2. A11 existing improvements including structures,landscaped areas, service areas, storage areas,walks, driveways, off -street parking, loadi-ng areas, retaining walIs (with top and bottom of
wa11 spot elevations) , and other existing siLe
improvements.
3. In order to determine proposed building heiqht.s elevations of all Lop roof ridges, and eaves when
determined necessary by Lhe zoning administrator,shall be indicaLed on the site plan with existing
and proposed contour lines shown underneath.
Landscape Plan (1" = 20' or larger) - 3 copies reguired
1. At a minimum, the followi.ng information must be provided on the landscape plan:
a. Location of existinq trees 4" di-ameter or
Larger,
b. Type, size and locaLion of all existing and proposed planL material ,
c. Location of all trees to be transplanted,
d. A detai]ed legend of all proposed plant material including common and Latin names.
2. The location and type of exj"sting and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for plant maLerial following its installation.
3. Existing and proposed contour Iines. Retaining walls should be included wlth Lhe cont,our information with top of wall and bottom of wall
el eva t i-ons Ii-sted.
4. CompleLe the allached l_andscape maLerials list,.
Slqn off from each uLilitv companv verifying Lhe locaLion of utili!.y service and availability (see
.a F r-.ar.l-,64 rr t- i I i '-.' verif icatiOn f Orm) ,
A preliminarv title report Schedule A and B must
accompany aIl- submi. ttal-s, to insure property ownershi:p and idenLify a1l- easements affecting the subjecL
Pr \JPer Ly .
Architectural Plans (1/$" = 1, or larger, t/4" is preferred scale for review) 3 copies are required.
Floor plans and all elevations of the proposed
development drawn Lo scale and fully dimensioned.
The elevation drawinqs musE show both existinq and
E.
F
One set of fLoor plans must be "red-lined" to show
how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was
calculated.
ExLerior materials and colors sha11 be specified on Lhe at.Lached materials 1ist. This mat.erials IisL must be compJ-eted and submiLted as a part of the applicaEion. Color chips, siding samples etc., sha1l be presented at t.he Design Review
"rt meetins. Details in.rufrq, but not limiLed to fascia, trim, railings, chimney cap, meter locations, etc. must be shown graphically and
fu11y dimensioned.
c. zone check lisc (attached) must be completed if the project is located within the single-Fami1y,primary/Secondary or Duplex zone districts.
H. Photos of Lhe existing site and where applicable, of
adjacenL structures.
I. The Zoning Administrator and,/or. DRB may require the
submission of additional p1ans, drawings,specificaLions, samples and oLher maLerials (includi:ng
a model) if deemed necessary to determine whether a project will comply with Design Guidelines.
V. IIINOR AI.,TER]LTIONS TO THE EXTERTOR OF BUII,DTNGS.
Photos or sket.ches which clearly convey Ehe redevelopment proposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopment proposal may be submitted in lieu of Lhe more formal
requirements set forth above, provided all important specifications for the proposal including colors and
maEerials to be used are submitted.
VI . ADDITIONS - RESTDENTIAIJ OR COII{MERCIAIJ
A. Original floor plans with all specifications shown.
B. Three sets of proposed floor plans L/8" = L'or larger (1/4"=f ispreferred)
C. Three copies of a siLe plan showing existing and proposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevations with existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
D. Elevations of proposed addition.
E. Phot.os of the existing st.ructure.
. F. SpecificaLions for a1I materials and color samples on materials list (attached) .
At the request of the Zoning Administrator you may also be required. Eo submit:
c. A statement from each uLility verifying location of service and availability. See attached utility location verificaLion form.
H. A siLe improvement survey, stamped by registered
Colorado Professional Licensed surveyor.
I. A preliminary tille report, Lo verify ownership of property, which lists all easements.
VII. FINAL SITS PLAI\T
Once a building permj-t has been issued, and construcEion is
underway, and before the Building Department will schedule a framing inspection, Lwo copies of an Improvement Location Certj-ficate survey (ILC) stamped by a regristered professional engineer must be submitted. The following informat.ion must be provided on the ILC:
A. Building location(s) with ties to property corners,i.e. distances and angles.
B. Building dimensions to the nearest Lenth of a foot.
(.arr utif,lty service rine as-built.sQnorrnn rlpe of maLerial used, and size and exact location of li-nes.
Basis of bearing to Lie to section corner.
A11 property pins are to be either found or set and staLed on improvement survey.
A11 easements.
Garage slab elevati-ons and all roof ridge elevations with exisLing and proposed grades shown under the ri_dge
I.LTICD .
VIII . CONCEPEUAIJ DESIGN REVTEW
A- SUbmiLtal reqUirements: Tn*. e Or;\rner Or authorized agenL of any project requiring design approval as prescribed by this chapter may submit plans for conceptual review by the Design Review Board to the Department of
Communi ty Development. The conceptual rewiew is intended to give the applicant a basic understanding of the compatibility of t,heir proposal with the Town,s
Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommended primarily for applications more complex than single-family and two-family residences. However, developers of sinqle-family and two-family projects shall not be excluded from the opportuni_ty to request a conceptual design review. CompLete applications must be submitted 10 working days prior Lo a scheduled DRB meeting.
The foll-owing information sha11 be submitted for a conceptual review:
1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals twenty feet;
2. ConceptuaL elevations showing exterior maLerials
and a description of the character of Lhe proposed structure or s Lruc tures :
3. Sufficient j:nformation to show the proposal
complies with Lhe development standards of the
zone disLric[ rn which the project is to be located (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calcuIaLions.
number of parking spaces, etc.);
4. CompleLed DRB application form.
B. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, the DepartmenL of Communit.y
Development shall review Lhe submitted materials for general compliance with Lhe appropriaLe requirements of Lhe zoning code. If Lhe proposal is in basic
compLiance with the zoning code requirements, the project shall be forwarded t.o the DRB for conceptual review. If the applicalion is noL generally in
compliance with zoning code requiremenLs, the application and submittal materials shall be returned Lo the applicant with a written explanat.ion as to why the corununity Development Department staff has found the projecL noL to be in compliance with zoning code requrremenLs. Once a complete application has been received, the DRB shall review the submitted conceptual review application and supporting mat.erial in order to determine whether or not the project generally complies with the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote on conceptuaL reviews. The property owner or his representative sha11 be present at t.he DRB hearing.
D.
E.
T{
IJIST OF MATERIAI'S
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION
STREET ADDRESS:
The following informatj-on is required for submittal Lo t.he Desigrn
Review Board before a final approval can be g'iven:
A. BUILDING II,ATERIALS:
Roof
TYPE OF }TATERIAI,cor.,oR
Siding
Other Wall Material-s
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
uoo Ir1m
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
.r 1^ .i -- ^-,^\-rr rlrLtl E y D
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
ReE.aining WaIIs
Exterior Liqhting
OLher
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:phone:
PLAIIT MATERIT:
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
Botanical Name co**o,Qu*e nrr.anl- i t-rr ai za*
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for
deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indj-cate height for coniferous Lrees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet.**Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is 5 qallon.
GROUND COVERS
Sguare Footaqe
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior IighLing is proposed, please
show Lhe number of fixtures and locaLions on a separate liqhting plan. Idencify each fixlure from the lighLing plan in the space below and provide Lhe heighL above grade, Eype of Iiqhl proposed, Iumen output, luminous area and a cut sheeL of
Lhe light fixture. (SecLion 18.54.050 J)
oTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (reLaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) PIease specify. IndicaLe heights of retaining walls, Maximum height of walls within Lhe front setback is 3' . Maxj-mum heiqht of walls elsewhere on the property is 6,
D.
SUBDTVISION
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The location and availability of utiliLies, whether trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and following uLilities for the accompanying site plan.
. Authorized.Siqnature
6.
* Pl a.-co Lrr-inrr eL 1-LY obtaining Upper flow needs must
they be main verified by Lhe
Date
U.S. West Communications
1- 800 -922-1987
468-6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
949-s781.
Gary Ha11
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
9 49 - 5892
Ted Husky/I.,tichae1 lJaverty
Heritage Cablevision T.v.
949 - 5530
Steve Hiatt
Upper Eagle Valley Water
& Sanitation District *
4'76-7480
Fred Haslee
NOTE: 1. This form is Lo verify service availabi-lity and Iocation. rhis should be used in conjuncLion with preparing your uLiliLy plan and scheduling instalLations.
For any new consLruction proposal , the applicant
must provide a completed utility verification form.
If a utili-Ly company has concerns with the proposed
construction, the utility represenLative should not direclly on the utility verificat.ion form that there is a problem which needs Lo be resolved. The issue should then be spelled ouE in detail in an attached Ietter lo the Town of Vai1. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the ut.ility
company to resolve identified problems.
If the uEilicy verificaLion form has signat.ures from
each of Lhe uti-liLy companies, and no conrmenbs are
made directly on Lhe form, the Town will presume
that lhere are no problems and that the development
can proceed.
These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut permit
from the Town of Vail, Department of Pub1ic works
and to obtain utiliLv locations before dioqinq in
any public right-of-way or easement in the Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not a street cut permit.
A streeL cul permit must be obtained separately.
Installation of service lines are at the expense and responsibi-fi-ty of Lhe property owner.
a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when
Eagle Valley Wat.er & SaniEation signaLures. Fire
be addressed.
5.
v
aml
DATE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot BLock Subdivision
Single F
ZONE CHECK
FOR
ly Residence, Duplex, pr
ZONE DTSTRICTS
o
imary /Secondary
AnnpE qq.
OWNER
ARCHI?ECT
LOT SIZE
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
PHONE
PHONE
BUILDABLE I,OT AREA
AIIowed Existinq Proposed Total_
(30) (33)Height.
TOIA1 GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks Front
S ides
Rae r
Si f o 1-nrror.arro
T,:ndqnrni nrr
Retaining Wa11 Heights
Parking
ar--.--^ /r*^r: !\rcL! crlj e \,.L ts:LI_t L
Drive:
,/-^nr* l i ^^ ..,.; !1- h .\,ulnpr--Lers wrLn '1 . O.V.
Water Course Setback
3'/6'
Reqrd
(300) (600) (900) (1200)
Permitted Slope % proposed Sl-ope
Lighting Ordinance Yes No
+ 425
+425=
20'
15'
'J-5',
Encl
%
(30) (s0)
Do Fini-sh Grades Exceed 1 (50%)
2') PercenL SLope (< > 30%)
3) Geologic Hazards a) Snow Avalanche b) Rockfall
c) Debris Flow
4) Wetlands
View Corridor Encroachment: yes
Does t.his r€quesl invuive a 250 Aooition?
How much of t.he allowed 250 Addition is used wiLh this
Prevlous conditions of approval (check properLy file):
No
reques t?
10
c t !
m !
m
o
m
s
m
o o z o o tr o I
m 0 o D z
ti I
6 z
=E l-j
dq
<o
o1
gg
9E o (t
(,)
-.1 g,
o
* o- --l
=.=;o0E
6g o;ox !t6
Ee
C q
m
@
!!D F=}E
== .Y
-o o o 3<p
-tct aiq-En d I
o -
Tt Tt Fr
\JZ
zo 9o.
c.r €oo
{m
a
s5'=iEi
=3d ap-_
:E.d
=8d
:*d8
d;d
BA g
Fq$
o{
<|'f
c z I
-It
o
ol rnl 2l tnl II
:l
=l ot
$l
!l
dl
FI
Drrn!!n!n!
5Ff5$H5HaA qEdei=si5d
sEt gaai;e g
g!''-3EiEF I <RSq aii :3 d=6', -s (D;--;AP
4 E'e s 1€g
I 9<
x
FFFFFFFFFF*
5N(rNO)(r)NNN55
- or (o o (D o @ @ @ o!(r '.r (D @ N (' @ N @ @-{N O (D J N..t r -.r N.{z
-o
d J
u,o
o
z
TN z
o
T'
65a3.29
€n f3.89 S
a34'.23
&t+7.16 u
8:t'$.1O S
5 @
oRnpOE Hr
8364.50 SW
EJ64.60 N
TRACT A f\
@\
Pt \.'t,
'/V
5^r@
(c\
{\'?l
\r\r\
\..*o@
a+
11
\
6370.07
8:t70.04
ft\F.ipsi Tt>?8 a
_/.-t
\
w
fNY 635E.72 NE frneu) lxv 6556.09 sE \<::j,/ rNv E356.oa Nw
A'h#6rf llV S33:7
"'fr
_otD,
I
@
66so-.)
10 \--""2 .72 S I
i.47 Ntl
5 @ t
o
.f
@ rO
fil..gct*1t /
?e
ilt'.{i c-':ilit,i}il}l
,'ij)i\.;\'.i { ,;l:
;1, r;: 'ril jl
'rI'
"'lit"
JELIC LJCIRKS :3034792166 JUt 26',94 N0 .001 P .01
Uppen Eacue \
SlHrre
!,r0 rontST fiO,
(aog) 474.7{
,fuly 15, 1994
Greg Hall
Town of ValI connrunlty Developnent
75 South Frontage Road l{est Vail, CO 81657
Dear 9ir:
lfe are ln the process of replacing approxirnately 500-feet of sanltary Eewer rnaln along Gore creek ln Eaet vail.
Please reference the attached nap for the 6xact location. f
would like to aubnit thie document as the proposed landscape
and revegetatlon plan for the conetructlon slte.
Deeqfie.!.kln o€ W.orFi
1. Ehe contractor will remove, with care, as many of the exieting salix (willows) aE necessary to do
the work.
2, The willows will be set aside and kept alive for the expected three to four day conatructlon period.- Thie is three to four dayi per site.
3. The two glteE wl1l be regracled to match preconetruction condltlone.
4, The willows wil] be replanted so the eites will
rnatch preconetruction condl-tions as cloeely as ls practlcal.
5. A nixture of U.S.F.9. (i.e. v.A.) mountain mix wlld graEs seed wl}l be spread arouncl the
constructl-on elte.
The Arny Corp of Engineene has permltted the ntork and
landscape under their 4o4 Nation Wide Pernit,
The lntent cf the Contractor and Upper Eagle Valley
Consolldated sanitation pistrict is to relandgcape the area to natch precenstruction conditions as closely aEi le practiaal .
MAI{aoli loF lH: FOLLowtNo WarEF t)rs.Tarc.rel
AFROWHEAO METFO WAIEF . BEAVEB C'IEEK METFO WA'TER ' EEBNY C'\ETK MCTf,O WA'€A
EAGLE.VAIL METRO }YATEA . E]WANOA iiETFO WAT€F ' LAXE OREEK MI{TJO\iTS WATIA
lrFPFn FAOI F nf,OloNal WAlfn AL)lHOOllY . VA|L \ALIEY COftSOLTOAieA wA'rEF N
VFIL#ELIC IJORKS ID:3054792166 o IDY o JUL
sanltary sewer Main
Page 2
Take into conEl-deration, the wlllows are one of the
prlrnary reasons these sectj-one of llne have to be replaaed.
ihe ro6te have penetrated ttre plpe and are in the procese of
pluEging the llne conpletely. Ideally, no vegetatlon other
Lnan-gries should be replanted ln the gewer main easement to
ellmlnate any poeaible root problene.
Please adviee if this plan is acceptable. A Prontpt
reponBe to thts rnatter would be appreclated.
If you have any guestlons or concerns please give me a
call at (303) 476-7480 Ext. 34.
9:01 No.001 P.02
Sincerely,
/U*F" -rJJ
Gordon nHawkeyerf FlahertY
Maintenance Manager
ATTACHMENT
GF:bal
APPLICATION FOR
TOWN OFVAIL
PUBLfcwAYPERMTT E 94
.u,
| . -:"it
, (on],'nrrlo I lrl)rrl (ors/ro.]ors 0o'6o* saq o 7q? - /c5? /2 ( y
-' Excavatino Contractor Name Address Phone # TOV Contractor's License Number
4. Work is for (circle one)Gas Electric Telephone CATVOther
Temporary Site Access
Gnstn 6 d/Deprh t7 /c ,4,
-
Permit Fee $Total Permit Fee $
/
Legal Address
water @
Landscaping
5. Trench-width 7 64,(min.4') /
Bond Amount $
7.
ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE BEFORE THE
JOB IS STARTED.
Ftubber out-riggers are required on excavating equipment when working on asphalt.
Asphalt surfaces underneath the bucket shall be protected at all times.
8. A signature below indicates a review of lhe area anO J$y and approvals. Once all utility company
signatures are obtained, permittee has option of routing lhrough the Public Works office to obtain the
necessary Town of Vail signatures. Please allow one
Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation (476-7480)
Public Service Company (1 -800-922-1987)
PSCO-Natural Gas Group (468-2528)
Holy Cross Electric Company (949-5892)
U.S. West (1 -800-922-1 987)
TCI Cablevision of the Rockies (949-5530)
Leu!-eil{eili
lrrigation (4
Public Works 1s8)
9. THERE WILL BE NO TOTAL STREET CLOSURES! A construction traffic control plan must be approved by the
Public Works Department prior to issuance of the permit.
All excavation must be done by hand within 18" of utilities - (Senate Bill 172).
Permittee must contact Public Works Department at 479-2158 24 hours prior to commencing backfill operations.
Failure to notify lhe Town will result in lorfeiture ol bond money. Scheduled inspections which are not ready may
result in the Town charging the contractor a reinspection fee.
1 2. I certify that I have read all chapters of Title 12 - Streets and Sidewalks, ol the Vail Municipal Gode and all utility
"yn, ^n 7"I:"",oo, ^., "no*,,, r,n" "^
;:,)f,:*n*"o..""*"0
*,
Contractor's Signature of Agreement DAe of Sigfiatu.e
E'|1 -8lsq
SleuzLeu)ts
ATTACH PIAN OFWORK, INCLUDING CONTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
Show streets with names, buildings, and location ol cuts. USE DASH LINES FOR CUT.
,f,
10.
11.
; ---- /tplocc 2.rr1 ._==.=-tvl:tl
-L.r-p-,' ,*-*D-t.'--
THIS IS NOT PUBLIC WAY PERMIT!
While - Public Works Yellow - Finance Pink - Community Development Gold - Contraclor
o++
Allison Lassoe had nothing further to add.
Jeff Bowen stated that the original approval for the wall heigh
for the garage to be located in the front setback and that to
story structure was not the intent of the original approval for the wall height variance.
Bob Armour opposed GRFA being located in the front setback.
Bill Anderson agreed with Bob's comment. He asked the applicaqt why he desired to
build a 24 tool tall garage if no floor area was allowed.
Dan Frederick felt that the 24 loot tall garage was a better design than what the PEC
had previously approved.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to deny the request for a setback variance to allow for
GRFA to be located in the front setback with Dalton Williams seconding the motion. A
6-0 vote denied the applicant's request.
Andy Knudtsen stated that he would discuss the situation with Tom Moorhead to
determine which board (PEC/DRB) has puruiew over which sections of the Zoning
Code.
4.A request for an update on the conditional use permit approval for the tent to be used
for the Vail Associales ski school to be located south of the
BuildingiTract A, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Tim Kehoe, representing Vail Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen presented modified drawings of the proposed tent to be located at the
Vail Associates ski school located south of the Lionshead Center. He stated that the
DRB had approved the tent with the condition that the exterior tent have a 'Woodsy,
western-like" appearance.
The PEC was not concerned with the proposed location of the tent.
Jack Hunn explained the differences between the currently proposed tent and the tent
approved by the PEC.
Bill Anderson inquired how Vail Associates proposed to achieve the "woodsy" concept
the DRB had requested.
Jack Hunn stated that this would be accomplished via a series of applied logs on the
exterior.
Kathy Langenwalter pointed out that the current tent was not what the PEC had
recently approved.
Planning ald Environmential Commission Minut6
October 10, 1994
r'f I
the garage into a two-
/
Jack Hunn stated that since the DRB had requested that the PEG review window
modifications to the tent as a condition of approval that he felt that it was a good
opportunity for the PEC to look at the currently proposed design of the tent.
Bill Anderson did not have any concerns about the proposed plastic windows.
Bob Armour and Jeff Bowen did not have any issues with the proposed plastic
windows.
Allison Lassoe stated that she was abstaining from this item'
Dalton Williams was concerned that the wooden exterior would give the appearance of
a more permanent structure. He stated that he was not in favor of the proposed
plastic windows.
Kathy Langenwalter summarized that the PEC would like to see the logs eliminated
from the gable ends and that the PEC did not have a western theme in mind when
they approved the original tent. She stated that she would prefer flags as opposed to
additional railings for the tent.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the proposed tent modifications, that the
proposed log treatments not be required, that the poles be round rather than square,
that railings not be required and that the windows within the gables not be allowed.
Bill Anderson seconded the motion and a 5-0-1 vote approved this request with Allison
Lassoe abstaining.
5. A request for an update lor a major amendment to the Glen Lyon SDD to allow for a
revision to the master plan to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office Building
located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesVArea D, Glen Lyon SDD'
Applicant: Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Associates of Chicago, represenled
by Pierce, Segerberg and Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO OCTOBER 24' 1994
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item to the October 24, 1994 with Bill
Anderson seconding the motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this request to the October 24,
1994 PEC meeting.
6. A request lor front and side setback variances to allow for a new residence to be
located at 1788 Alpine Drive/Lot 1 1 , Vail Village West 1st Filing.
Applicant Thomas TheYs
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED INDEFINITELY
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item indefinitely with Bob Armour seconding
this itern. A 6-0 vote tabled this item indefinitely.
Planning and Environme al Commission Minutes
frober 10, | 994
ln Ou* u Ufr ['i
Kathy Langenwalter was most concerned with the site planning for this project. She
felt that an approach that would fill in the existing side of the west building would have
the least impact on the Frontage Road, the Interstate, etc. She felt a different
approach was needed lor this site and staled that this was what the SDD criteria was
about. She said that she would like to see a plan that was more sensitive to the site.
Dalton Williams agreed with Kathy's comments. He said that should the applicant
proceed with the current proposal, that the two phases be reversed so that the parking
structure was built first.
Bill Anderson stated that it appeared that the current proposal was designed around
the current building and that possibly a demolition of the existing building should be
considered.
Ken O'Brien stated that they had previously approached the staff with a plan that
called for utilizing the space at the west end of the site but that the Town staff felt that
there was loo much site disturbance with that plan.
Andy Knudtsen slated that the scale of that project was much larger'
Ken O'Brien stated that he could bring this scenario to the next PEC worksession so
that the PEC could review it and compare the two proposals.
It was agreed that the applicant would return for a discussion at the next PEC hearing,
that a site visit was not needed, but when the following hearing was scheduled' the
applicant would stake the site.
3. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a tent to be used for the Vail
Associalesskischoo|tobe|ocatedsouthoftheruffractA,
Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Tim Kehoe, representing Vail Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
The PEC members elected to forego a formal staff presentation of this item.
Kathy Langenwalter asked the applicant how electrical power would get to the tent'
Tim Kehoe stated that their first choice would be to underground the lines. The
second choice would be to run a line from a different location that would also be
underground.
Bob Armour inquired what the specific use of the tent was'
Tim Kehoe responded that the tent would be used for children's ski school activities'
Planning and Environmemal Commission Meeting Minutes
SeDtember 26. 1994
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve this request for a conditional use permit per the
staff memo with the condition outlined on Page 4. Bill Anderson seconded the motion.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she would like the motion amended to reflect that if the
site is used in subsequent years that the recreation path be relocated.
Jeff amended his motion and Bill amended his second accordingly.
A 6-0-1 vote approved this item, with Allison Lassoe abstaining from this item.
4. A request for front and side setback variances to allow for a new residence to be
located at 1788 Alpine Drive/Lot 1 1 , Vail Village West 1st Filing.
Applicant: Thomas Theys
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED TO OCTOBER 10, 1994
c.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this request to the October 10, 1994 PEC meeting
with Bob Armour seconding this motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this item to lhe October 10,
1994 PEC meeting.
A request for a worksession for a Special Development District and a major CCll
exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment and expansion of the L'Ostello Lodge
located at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail/Uonshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:TABLED TO OCTOBER 10, 1994
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this request to the October 10, 1994 PEC meeting
with Bob Armour seconding this motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this item to the October 10,
1994 PEC meeting.
Approve minutes from September 12, 1994 PEC meeting.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve lhe minutes lrom the September 12, 1994 PEC
meeting with Bill Anderson seconding the motion. A 5-0-1 vote approved the minutes
for the September 12, 1994 PEC meeting with Kathy Langenwalter abstaining as she
was absent from the last PEC meeting.
Update on Community Development Director selection process.
Mike Mollica gave an update of the Community Development Director selection
process to the PEC.
Reminder: Allison Lassoe will be the PEC representative to the DRB lrom October
through December, 1994.
Planning and Envi.onmsntal Commission Meeting Minutes
SeDtembef 26. 1994
Alien. Inc./John Dunn
Randy Stouder
6.
7.
8.
COPY FI!-E
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
3 03 -479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
October 12, 199,1
De parune nt of Comn uniry D eve lopne nt
Mr. Jack Hunn, Director, Design and Construction
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Ski School Tent at the Lionshead Base
Dear Jack:
On October 1 1, 1994, the Town Council reviewed the decision of the Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC) approving the Conditional Use Permit for the ski school tent
at the base of Lionshead. The Town Council expressed concern about the proposed tenl.
They understand that the use is limited to one year only and highly discourage a second year
in this location. lf Vail Associates finds that the floor area is beneficial to the ski school
program, the Town encourages you to lind a permanenl building to locate the use in. We also
bncourage you to incorporate this need into the programming for any redevelopment plans for
either Lionshead or Gold Peak.
Thank you for your cooperation in working on this effort. Please give me a call if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
-;i-I
^ llt ll
?tf,^- q f- ^J f-f lJ t' \
Andy Knudtsen \
Senior Planner
Category Num
Proiect Name:
CSign Review Action ilt
TOWN OF VAIL
L-..ber [ 1- Date
L, ,,.1,.', . .1,. ,, ,i
Building Name:
Proiect Descriplion:
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecvcontact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot r'\ Block -Subdivision ;,r',, i [,.' ,L. -- 1''- ZoneDistrict -- - '7:-
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Motion by:
Board i Staff Action
Vote:
Seconded by:
! Approval
a Disapproval
f Staff Approval
Conditions:
w'V-r-*;'$ u\'t'o
./DRB Fee Pre-paid
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
October 10, 1994
AGENDA
Proiect Orientation/Lunch
sitevisits .",{'#'2-
.-'.-...
Frederick r'
44 Willow Place
Applicant: Jay Peterson
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
A request for a
for a proposed
Intermountain.
I
,11". F'vr
D.-.a-t^^ c.t ll , ,,-.
setback variance to allow for GRFA to be located in the
structure al 2840 Basingdale Boulevard/Lot 4, Block 9, V
J -d{ E.**--.t
front setback
ail
S.. fu ",*J
A.*{l^k 6-o -,>
ol the Lionshead Center
1,'.h,::4 -"^- J+/ Lf":"-'-
z''u ' & r/ /,n t.-,'--.
.--;------*--.r-\ ,t{-a;P.- .a I *-4-:_:----=--\
to allow for a'
Office Building
.-[ r+ K^,"',.
V,'l'' L c -a
-.-----1.-l : lrkvt-u,.,.-c I It 11 |l---)
2.
3.
Applicant:
Planner;
Daniel Frederick
Andy Knudtsen
i 4 L.,'tlt l\ LV
,,t*J z-
A request lor an update on the conditional use permit
for the Vail Associates ski school to be located south
Building/Tract A, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Tim Kehoe, representing Vail Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for an update for a major amendmenl to the Glen Lyon SDD
revision to the masler plan lo allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon
located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesVArea D, Glen Lyon SDD.
6 "., u l.., rL.t I
(l
u *",-., 4 p,,-, ^/t-' t
12:15 p.m.
1:00 p.m.
Drivers:Andy and Jim
Public Hearinq 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a conditional use to allow for three employee housing units to be located
at 44 Willow Place/Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Associates of Chicago, represenled
by Pierce, Segerberg and Associates 6_-,t--=r=*-.K"-Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO OCTOBER 24, 1994 ) 'u'ah + t:'1'--
t 1t-t- /\,.^
A reouest for front and side setback variances to allow for a new residence to be ?
locatedatlT8SAlpineDrive/Lotll,VailVillageWestlstFiling. : .t r i r f, , \;tr'f tr1rlt \Applicant: Thomas Theys ; --, i
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED INDEFIN|TELY i t I ,''\,.
r-_--=-l
nsion to the residence that would |'2 extend to within 4.7 teet of the property line at 4295 Nugget Lane/Lot 7, Bighorn
Estates.
Applicant: Margaret Gross
Planner: Randy Stouder
7. A request for a worksession for a Special Development District and a major CCll , exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment and expansion of the L'Ostello Lodge
located at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail/Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Alien, Inc,/John Dunn
Planner: Randy Stouder TABLED INDEFINITELY
8. Approve minutes from September 26, 1994 PEC meeting.
9. Council Update:
.Open Space text amendments.
10. Vail Commons Update.
WITHDRAWN
v/
,A t\)\:
(3)
/tc J'i,-,o,,,^'
O Lo.--A-.^,J Ck,
/ec- c,..r1- (,<4r^t
@u@ fcozr|<
4.._ I _"<-./_t
ry'o
-e1* ^-*k l?- -,-u
' ' 't <1 .. t,€t--
,a- ,..- y'.e
-7-'''-(
lsign Review Action 0m
TOWN OF VAIL
category Number
Building Name:
Project DescriPtion:
J'a^
S.'"- G-^/ t/s. ^-ry'-r=*"-/ y'JJ o " t"/r {
oaner, Ad4ress andPhone: l/a: / -t-ssag ^s/4n=-JJ 1 7,u /Z Z *
ArchitecVOontact, Address and Phone: h /rt-.w/
Legal Descriptio n: rct 4 Block -Subdivision
-.Zone
District cczt-
Proiect Street Address:
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
t'\
Motion by: I\arr.-c- Vote:4-o -/
Seconded by:
VRpprovat
I Disapproval
O Statf Approval
Conditions:
4 .-,,',/ffi,3.">< *-* /{*rr*4'
- -*r--d-'l\n
Town planner
o^r", /a/r/ ?f DRB Fee p,",suia 6 d J/48
t{no *n./;r/n.J..-
\
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
September 26, 1994
A request for a conditional use permit to allow
for the Vail Associates ski school to be located
Building/Tract A, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
v,k'ia-o- I Tim Kehoe, representing Vail Associates
Andy Knudtsen
t r./'
F4t {.*- ,)," I t-
7n { $'ll
for a temporary tent to be used
south of the Lionshead Cenler
.F*tt,''l'
/tz <,4,\--l -"+-\EL
.//
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
Vail Associates is proposing to construct a temporary tent at the base of the Lionshead ski
porlal to facilitate ski school instruction. The tent will be made of white canvas supported by
pine logs. lt will be similar in appearance to the struclures at the Piney River Ranch. The
sides of the tent will also be made of white canvas and can be rolled uo so that the tent
functionsasanopenpavilion. Thetentwill belSfeettall atitshighestpoint. ltwill be40
feet long and 25 leet wide. There will be a wooden floor conslructed in the interior of the tent,
which will be located approximately 2 feet above existing grade. lt is intended to be flush with
the level of the snow on the outside of the tent. Staff understands that the tent will not be
used at night and will not have any lights inside. The tent will not require guy wires to support
it.
On August 22, 1994, the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) reviewed a
proposed "clam shell" structure for this site. Due to the concerns expressed about its
architectural compatibility with the Lionshead area, Vail Associales is no longer pursuing that
concept. The current proposal is more along the lines of a traditional western lent structure.
The Town is considering this tent structure request as a "recreation facility", which is listed as
aconditional use underSection 18.26.040(D). Because it is atemporary building, it is not
reouired to be reviewed under the CCll exterior alteration criteria. Vail Associates
understands that if the structure is approved, it would have to be removed immediately
after the ski season. Vail Associates and Town staff have agreed that the tent must be
removed by April 22, 1995. For the 1995-96 season, it could not be replaced without
another conditional use review.
<'J / L'</"tyz.1\J:
/. rL
f<J Y"'' u -----.*
/
il.COMMERCIAL CORE II ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Zoning: Commercial Core ll
Area: 1 .645 acres or 71,656.2 sq. tl.
Heighl:
S€tbacks:
Allorved
45 feel
10' on all sides
Proposed
18 feet
'1.4% or 1 ,000 sq. n.
94.9% or 67,985 sq. fl.
N: 22'S: 105'E: 80'W: 14O'
Site Coverage: 70% or 50,159 sq. tt.
Landscaping: 20% or 14,331 sq. tl.
Parl(ng: Parking is not required for lemPorary slruclures.
III. CRITERTA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community Development Department recommends
approval of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of
the Town,
The development objectives of the Town ol Vail can be found in the purpose
section of the zone district as well as the zoning title of the Municipal Code.
The purpose section of lhe Commercial Core ll zone district calls for a mixture
of uses. Section 18.02.020(D, 10), the purpose section for the zoning title calls
for the provision of recreational facilities. Stalf believes that this recreational
facility will continue to augment the ski school program in the Lionshead area.
We believe that ski school facilities are an appropriate use to add to the mixture
of uses at the Lionshead skier base.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that there will not be any negative impacts to the criteria
referenced above.
3. Effect upon trafiic with particular relerence to congestion,
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, access, maneuveEbility, and removal ol snow from the
street and parking areas.
tv.
This
Staff believes that there will be little impact on traffic or relaled issues as the
proposed structure may actually increase pedestrian traffic in the area, but is
not likely to generate additional vehicular trips in Lionshead.
The Fire Department has stipulated that the tent may only be used for one
hundred and eighty days, that the canvas must be lire retardant, and that the
maximum occupant load be sixty-seven persons. Vail Associates has agreed to
comply with these standards.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is
to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
Staff believes that the proposed tent is consistent with the character ot the
Lionshead area. We believe that the materials, canvas and logs, add to the
character of the structure. The form of the building is consistent with a
traditional western tent. Statf believes that the proposal is reasonable, given
that it willbe limited to the 1994-1995 skiseason. Staff believes that if Vail
Associates finds that the floor area is needed for their ski school operations that
Vail Associates propose a permanenl structure in the future. We believe that
for a one-year trial basis, the proposed structure is acceptable.
B. Findinos
The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followinq findinos before
orantino a conditional use oermit:
1. That the proposed location ol the use in accord with the purposes of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of
the district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
LIONSHEAD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
location is not identified in any ol the Subarea Concepts.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval ot the request with one condition. We believe that the proposal
is consistent with the criteria as discussed above as well as the findings. Specifically, staff
believes that Finding 1 is met in that the purpose of the facility is consistent with the
Commercial Core ll zone district. We believe that it is appropriate to accommodate guests
with additional ski school services at the Lionshead ski base. Concerning Finding 2, staff
believes that it is met because there will be no impacts to public health, safety, and welfare.
Concerning Finding 3, staff finds that the provisions of the Zoning Code are met. Therefore,
staff recommends approval of the request with the following condition:
1. Prior to April 22, 1995, Vail Associates will remove the structure from the site.
Any proposalfor the 1995-1996 season must be reviewed by the PEC as
another conditional use permit. Staff strongly recommends that if Vail
Associates finds that this facility is beneficial, that Vail Associates propose a
permanent facility in this general location.
c;\pec\memosvaclam.926
{.o :ri o tz
=7 Fi
o o s/
(
t\a DO .b
s
v\o
C o z o I
rn
o
o
m z
-{
rn !
I
-S rrt u1(0 NLiZ l\4 :qlr l. O l/rt
; r- -TA >T o )uT o utO =\0n \, lrlt trql 0;FZt TF
Fr z IA
\.8
\(,
2l
ttt l
(.
o
T
rr
II
?----l t r S-rJ
c4
.*','\\\iN, \'''r'\ \,\\:,t)\ \\ \ \\\V\),\'\\'\ ',)rtl\,\' r r\''\ti \\ ,\)J-)i ir\\l/ ,',x \ril,,r t// Y \ lljlr tri 1,1 ,
\;, lilii/r ' ,, I \'li'\l\\\'.'- :-
i ti\\\\.---i \'.'t\t\\>\\
I ')t'z-l i I I , (\' \'{
/,\\'' \/ \,1 \,, \ l ,/ \r(' J./ rtj
/ .,,(, \'''\l I-l ( i it, \
\ ,' ',\' ')
---
I
I
I
I
\'r
,i
l./t. /$
i^':!r) P)
:l +
7 ri.
'ut
'r 11. 1 \t
ir \\', \
lii li?
F-
.N
,I
FA./ILDF]
;5;'rl:lllAD
CntLDTAtJ'4 :fuii ;iir iii iFs$r .z 'i . '' D
-
TO: MIKE
PROJECT:
Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
o
McGEE GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Retum to Andv Knudlscn
Town Planner
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
/'1* /-.'rt -LJ .t,--.-f ,'Y:*_"1. !'f\, ,' '!.-'t4fl aLv ' v.< .-'. .w->e- \u-
DATE SUBMITTED: a/,< DATE OF PUBLTC HEARTNG a/Z@
.//
COMMENTS NEEDED eV: VZ,[
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
l-e'rf
ft^+ -+l /L,,' 6,.tr K*
' 6*-*
n F.-*-._'_ /j *Z'*a)
uJt_ f /6 *17t
s
e\so knz o a.d
t . C*f, L/,/,/r,
Landscaping: /
b
h* lJ
,o^, t/./o-/
,, *tU
*rI
*7
b.
\^7
(,4 )-k ?*4 a ht fnt o,,n' t L.f
Date:
a sta(dc{) a\(€q Cr L!)A\y- u:Ot1 7 f 5t C...,r \c)CfU.tCn \
h"* /",
Reviewed by:
Commenls: .
. }:es \ke tenu ce4jre
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Dale:
<>, /Distributed to the Fire Departmcnl, pubtic works, and Landscapins on ///Vrf- .
5 t\ - dO ".g grcvl'YYr's (xlYn rfl khe wrifWf ?
t
Relum lo
,2zirr,t,
DATE SUBMITI'ED:
/y'U,fot,.1ti7,
Town Planner
INTE il-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
ll!!e!!- zzttz,,ta €z'.a,a2",
DATE OF PUBLIC HI.AI'.IING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TI-IE PBOPOSAL:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed rrt out", 7 /r/7./
Commenls:/l'rV2tb Ffte- ,!elt): ,ft.rcsr, ,/.r'a /,U,/ke:
"{q////pg),.4/z7.tr'z- z, :/z"rre'sr 4r.e,rb- j.tz sr/e,u," ,?zA-,/uz4 vz7.;'5vz.qrrr((-
/2? l:72,: /2'4mut'.
7-e/fufuzytzy f)ftr;r777. -,'Ari C/c'. zJZ fe-/,/'/
ft>t 7-r/7lrt /r/ '),// )enL4'
/r-l/- Z,tz'l 72t'r' Cdr'&&)/(- /vri ^ ja',4 ftzzz'a,t4
,/)lrrntenu,tu /ellrt",') zt;te eztzt,E/lz''rrv,
,y'Jstt,tfe- no- r) @'tty' //' Ltl't:zn Z (U+)
,4//.(An,tyr Jr.rt,/Ury-1-,.,r/4 f//z,t{ 6Z (Se-e-Z)tc B, "O)
57/J/// l/?7/tuJ af ,Aemzfue
.ilt.d ltrtM
fe-x- /z//Ata/ ,llzte C)u- .4,a)/rct-, &:-za',t 3s..,
o
McGEE GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Retum to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
INTER.DEPAHTMENTAL REVIEW
3- /E/ -V /L_ u--_. -V ttt-xf 6, tr-* K*n F;
Date:
Date:
Date:
/
COMMENTS NEEDED av Vz4
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
TO: MIKE
Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
L.4^4_4-.-/:
E *l^-.,ta
.l
Distributed to the Fire Department, pubric works, and Landsca ping on 7/rT/*{-
Flft COP Y
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 I / 47e-2 I 3 I
FAX 303-479-2452
September9, 1994
De parnnent of Comnunity Deve lopment
Mr. Tim Kehoe
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, GO 81658
Fat<: 479-2054
RE: The "clam shell" at the Lionshead Ski Base
Dear Tim:
I would like to help clarify the review times for any proposal to be conslructed at the
Lionshead Ski Base. In order to make presentation at the September 26, 1994 Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC) meeting, please have plans submitted to our olfice no later
than Monday, September 12, 1994. This will allow us a minimal amount ol time to route the
plans through the Fire Department and Public Works Department for their comments. lt will
also allow the Community Development staff to develop a position on the proposal.
lf you have any specific questions about temporary structures, permanenl structures, the
Design Review Board (DRB) process, or the exterior alteration process, please do not hesitate
to call me. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
fr$uae
Andy'Knudtsen \
Senior Planner
FI["[ f;8PV
4.
6.
Approve minutes from August 8, 1994 PEC meeting.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the minutes from the August 8, 1994 PEC
meeting with Bill Anderson seconding the motion. A 3-0-1 vote approved the minutes
from the August 8, 1994 PEC meeting with Kathy Langenwalter abstaining as she was
not present at the August 8th PEC meeting.
Dalton Williams updated the PEC on the roundabout proposal for the four-way stop.
It should be noted that Allison Lassoe arrived at 2:00 p.m. for the meeting.
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a Type ll employee housing unit
located at 126 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 7, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: Ron Byrne
Planner: Jim CurnutteiGeorge Ruther
George Ruther made a presentation per the staff memo. He stated that staff was
recommending approval of this request with the two conditions outlined on Page 6 of
the staff memo.
Bill Beslock, the architect for this project, stated that he did not have any additional
comments but that he was concerned about staff's request regarding the common
sewer.
Kathy Langenwalter stated the common sewer was a Public Works issue.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the request for a conditional use permit to allow
lor a Type ll employee housing unit per the statf memo including the two conditions on
Page 6 of the staff memo. Dalton Williams seconded the motion and a 6-0 vote
approved this request.
A request lor a conditional use permit to allow for a tent to be used for the Vail
Associates ski school to be located south of the Lionshead Center Building/Tract A,
Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Joe Macy, representing Vail Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen/George Ruther
George Ruther made a presentation per the staff memo. He stated that stafl had an
additional concern regarding this request concerning the parking requirement. George
reviewed the criteria for a conditional use permit with the PEC and stated that staff
feels that the character of the Lionshead area would be negatively impacted by the
proposed tent. He state.d that statf was recommending denial of this request due to its
lack of compatibility with its surroundings. He added that should the PEC choose to
approve this item, that staff was recommending two conditions outlined on Page 4 of
the stalf memo.
Planning and Envkonmenirl Commission M€eling Minules
August 22, 1994
7.
Jack Hunn, representing Vail Associates (VA), stated that VA felt that the proposed
tent was appropriate for the uses they envisioned for it. He stated that Susie Tjossem,
ski school director, would explain how the tent would enable Vail Associates to
augment their training procedures. He added that the proposed tent would blend in
well with the existing building. Jack said that they would be able to add trees to this
location.
Susie Tjossem stated that video and lhe use of biofeedback has become one of the
new technologies which Vail Associates is trying to incorporate into their ski school.
Jack Hunn and Kurt Segerlcerg presented the PEC with a model and explained how
the proposed tent would function.
Kurt Segerberg stated that they had looked at several permanent-type structures and .
stated that the proposed "clam shell" was comparatively low profile.
Greg Amsden inquired whether there would be a floor in the tent.
Jack Hunn stated that there would be a floor and they would like the floor to be 2 feet
above the summer grade.
Bill Anderson stated that he had a problem with the architectural design and especially
with this model. He was aware that the PEC had approved tent-type structures in the
past for temporary uses but felt that more thought should be given to the architectural
elements and how to blend this in with the rest of Lionshead.
Greg Amsden stated that he felt the tent appeared "industrial" and did not fit with the
rest of Lionshead.
Jefl Bowen stated that the idea behind it was positive. He suggested that the tent
should be more "circus-like" and less industrial looking.
Allison Lassoe agreed with Jeff's comments.
Dalton Williams stated that he agreed with Bill's and Greg's comments concerning the
architecture. He believed that the proposed trees would not grow in the proposed
locations.
Kathy Langenwalter had mixed feelings about any temporary structure. She lelt the
lent should be sotter and less industrial in appearance. She acknowledged the
applicant's right to locate a structure at the proposed location.
Jack Hunn stated that they had been researching difierent structures for approximately
six weeks and that the "clam shell' so lar was the best solution regarding snow load
and flexibility.
Bill Anderson stated that the applicant had found a tent that was functional but that it
did not fit in with the rest of the Lionshead neighborhood. He said that he would still
have a problem with the "clam shell" regardless of what color it was.
Planning and Environmental Comrnission Meeting Minr.des
August 22. 199,1
o
e
Greg Amsden stated that the applicant needed to consider whether a tent was an
appropriate structure for the functions which Vail Associates had in mind. He felt that
the PEC supported the applicants proposed use but a more suitable structure needed
to be selected.
Dalton Williams supported the proposed use of the tent but stated that he could not
see how the tent could be located so that it would not encroach on the Magic Carpet
or snowcat operations.
George Ruther requested lhat the applicant explain the proposed interior lighting for
the requested tent.
Jack Hunn stated that the proposed tent would be used during the daytime only and
that only exterior lighting was being proposed.a
Kathy Langenwalter asked the applicant whether he wanted the PEC to vote on this
item or to table it so that the applicant could continue to work on the structure.
Jack Hunn stated that he would like to table this item and come back before the PEC.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item to the September 12, 1994 PEC meeting.
Bill Anderson seconded the motion and a 6-0 vote tabled this item to the September
12, 1994 PEC meeting.
8. Proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and Natural Open Space
Districtand Chapter 18.36, Public Use District, of the Vail Municipal Code and the
crealion of Chapter 18.33, Outdoor Becreation District.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
Russ Forrest made a presentation per the stafl memo. He stated that statt was
proposing a two-stage process. The first slage was the approval of the text
amendments to the Zoning Code. The second stage would involve stalf review of the
land uses throughout town and rezone parcels accordingly.
Joe Macy, representing Vail Associates, stated that VA was concerned with these
proposed text amendments specifically in regard to the Vista Bahn area. He stated
that this area needed additional ski base facilities. A second concern with the
proposed text amendments concerns the parcel of land located adjacent to the Lodge
at Vail. He stated that Chairlift 1 was located in this area and that should the text
amendments pass, that VA would not be able to replace this chairlift.
Jim Lamont said it was his understanding that the text amendments would not affect
any specific piece of land and asked staff to clarify how the rezoning process would
work.
Russ Forrest explained how the rezoning process would occur.
Jim Lamont was concerned about the potential to rezone parcels of land that already
had established uses.
Planning and Environmedal Commission M€eting Minules
Auqusl 22, 1994
\&'nhil@. a)
,-- \ail Associates, Inc.
C.ca'oB and OpcE tors of Va,l anl Bcevcr Crcc!. Rcsns
Post Office Box 7 o Vail, Colondo 8165E
Vail Associates, Inc.Cnir,'. n'it ()F,.ir,,6,r Vul ,".1 n,,*iC."l" n",u,,
Ptxt Officc Box 7 . Vail, Colcrnrfu 61658
._:.--. ^ &r,Lr\_lq, !ES r lll{_o .re;ft ,,..
::1
q".:,,,^,,r v,,r *l H,"*to.*" n"*,.l(rst Uflicc &rx Z. Varl, C.,ohrnrJo gt65g
l/^.;l A
, ;1u, ^ASSOCrates, rnc.-Ti",l *llh:.":'r v,,r *.r a",*,,c.*r. n ",",. vri v,,,cc rx)x / r Vail, C-okrrado g165g
Condominium Association for Lionshead Center
520 West Lionshead Mall
Vail, CO 81659
Town of Vail
75 South Fronhge Road
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
rggzOlympics QfrD
-
&,*3o3.2 (o
L',,, I ( u' 8 /a.sf
I:.Jrry Condonr inium Assocrarion
;:i,?Jl'|;fr"- Drive, suirc 3e7
Attention: Marbel Barnes
8i3tq+ -cLca-rYs ')R_fr G,cJ-
r)r \r<( \'J\ {
sll)ql+A+ -CJffS Glfi- oi-$-
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Toyvn of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on August 22,1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
1. Proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and Natural Open Space
District and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District, of the Vail Municipal Code and the
creation of Chapter 18.33, Outdoor Recreation District.
Applicant: Town ol Vail
Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
2. A request lor a worksession for a major amendmenl to the Glen Lyon SDD to allow
for a revision to the master plan to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office
Building located a11000 South Frontage Road WesUAreaD, Glen Lyon SDD.
Applicant: Pierce, Segerlcerg and Associales
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an expansion to the administration
building located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/Unplatted parcel located north of the l-70
RightOf-Way, north of Vail Village, 8th Filing.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represenled by Greg Hall
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for a setback variance to allow for a new residence at 5128 Gore Circle/Lot
4, Block 3, Bighorn Sth Addition.
Applicant: Ghislaine de Teronanne de Femande/represented by Duane Piper
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
:' A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a tent to be used tor the Vail
6.
Associates ski school to be located south ol the Lionshead Center Building/Tract A,
Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Joe Macy, representing Vail Associates Planner: Andy Knudtsen
A request for a variance from Section 18.69.040 (Development Restricted) of the Vail
Municipal Code to allow for the construction of a building on slopes greater than 40%
for a site located at 4403 Bighorn Roacl/Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn 3rd Addition.
Applicant: Belty Luke, represented by Mike Lauterlrach
Planner: Jim Curnutte
7.
L
A request for setback and site coverage variances and a major exterior alteration in
Commercial Core ll (CCll) for the Lifthouse Lodge, located at 555 East Lionshead
Circle, legally described as a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing'
Applicanl Robert T. and Diane J. Lazier
Planner; Jim Curnutte
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a Type ll employee housing unit
located at '126 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing.
A request lor height and density variances and a major CCll exlerior alteration to the
L'Ost,ello buildinglocated at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail/Lionshead
3rd Filing.
Applicant: Alien, Inc./John Dunn
Planner: Randy Stouder
Applicant:
Planner:
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will holdapublichearinginaccordancewithSection 18.66.060of theMunicipal Codeol
the Town of Vail on September 26, 1994, at 2100 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration ol:
1. A request lor a worksession lor a Special Development District and a major CCll
exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment and expansion of the L'Ostello Lodge
tocated at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail/Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Alien, Inc./John Dunn
Planner: Randy Stouder
2. A request for a variance to allow for a wall in the front setback to exceed 3 feet located
at2427 Garmisch DriveAot 13, Block H, Vail das Schone 1st Filing.
Applicant: T.J. Conners
Planner: Jim Curnutte
3. A request for lront and side setback variances to allow for a new residence t0 be
located at 1788 Alpine Drive/Lot 11, Vail Village West 1st Filing.
Applicant: Thomas Theys Planner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a worksession lor a major amendment to the Glen Lyon SDD to allow
for a revision lo the master plan to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office
Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesUArea D, Glen Lyon SDD.
Applicant: Pierce, Segerberg and Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a tent to be used for the Vail
Associates ski school to be localed south of the Lionshead Center Building/Tract A,
Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Joe Macy, representing Vail Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
. ,t
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
August 22,1994
I
i 9t?
I /,(
l-lr-'I -tu
SUBJECT: . A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a tent to be used for the Vail
Associates ski school to be located south of the Lionshead Center
Building/Tract A, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Joe Macy, representing Vail Associates Planner: Andy Knudtsen
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
VaillSSSg!"aleg-is proposing to construct a "clam shell" tent structure for the Children's Ski
School Program. This would be a temporary shelter located immediately east of the Born
F_ree Express, between the Lionshead Ski School location and the Magic Carpet lift. The
"clamshell"is45feetlong,28feetwide,andl6feet-1 inchtall. Theterm"clamshell"isthe
ffanO name of the tent stiucture that is proposed. lt will be constructed out of an aluminum
frame with a white polymer covering.
Tjte purpgs_g_-of the tent is to provide additional space for the ski school program. Vail
AEsociates-has totO the Town that they need the additional enclosed lloor area to facilitate the
ski school in Lionshead. The tent will have entrances on the north and south sides to allow
passage through it.
The Town j.s- considering this tent structure request a recreation facility, which is listed as a
coh-diti*on-al'use under Section 18.26.040(D). Because it is atemporaiy building, it is not
required to be reviewed under the exterior alteration criteria. Vail Associates understands
that if the structure is approved, it would have to be removed immediately after the ski
season. Staff believes that a May 1, 1995 deadline is appropriate. Next season, it could not
be replaced without another conditional use review.
II. COMMERCIAL CORE ITZONING CONSIDERAT]ONS
The Zoning Code does not provide a specific parking requirement for recreational facilities.
Similar to the analysis of the recent addition lo the ski school, staff recommends that the
applicant provide an analysis showing the incremental increase oi customers that are likely as
a result of the tent. At this time, staff has not asked for this analysis. lf the Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC) decides to approve the proposal, staff will work with the
applicant on the determination oJ the parking requirement and return to the PEC to confirm the
appropriate amount. Aillggftg i_s zoned CCll, the applicant will be required to pay into the
parking fund for any floor area determined to generale traffid.
t.,
Zoning: Commercial Core ll
Area: 1.645 acres or 71,656.2 sq. tt.
ffi
45 feel
10' on all sides
Height:
Selbacks:
Site Coverage: 70% or 50,159 sq. ft.
Landscaping: 20% or 14,331 sq. tl.
16 teel-l inch
N: 60'
S: 40'
E: 12O'W: 210'
1 ,8% or 1 ,260 sq. fi.
94% ot 67,726 sq. tt.
Parking: As previously discussed, the sile is zoned CCll, the applicant will be required lo pay inlo the parking
fund for any lloor area, delemined by lhe pEC to gonerale traftic.
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community Development Department recommends denial
ol the conditional use permit based upon the following factors:
Belationship and impact of the use on development oblectives ot
the Town.
The development objectives of the Town of Vail can be found in the purpose
section of the zone district as well as the zoning title of the Municipal Code.
The purpose section of the Commercial Core ll zone district calls lor a mixture
of uses. Section 18.02.020(D, 10), the purpose section for the zo4ing title calls
for the provision of recreationat facilities. Staff believes that this recreational
f aclllyIllgg{i n u e to a u g m en t th e s k i s c h o ol_plqgen@area.
ol facilitie5 are an appropriate use to add to the mixture
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution ot population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public tacilities needs.
Staff believes that there will not be any neggtiv-e_r-qlpqq! to the criteria
reterenced above.
ot uses at the Lionshead skier base.
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion,
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow trom the
street and parking areas.
Staff believes that there will be little impact on traffic or related issues as the
proposed structure may actually increase pedestrian traftic in the area, but is
not likely to generate additional vehicular trips in Lionshead.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is
to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
believes that the character of the area would be negatively impacted by
iin [ionshe-acl lW-e bGlieve
t!at!lly,{l_F qg'gp_co!!rag!to the buildings located to the north of this site,
as well as the stream and the riparian corridor, located to the south of the site.
e believe the CIa-m she-ll leflects a more industrial type of structure. We
understand the benefits of versatility and ease ofconstiGli-o-ET6WEV€r, we do
not believe that the proposed tent is of a quality that is appropriate to be
located in this area.
B. Findinqs
The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before
orantino a conditional use Dermit:
1. That the proposed location ol the use in accord with the purposes of the
conditional use permil section of the zoning code and ihe purposes of
the district in which the site is located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
tv.LIONSHEAD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
This location is not identified in any of the Subarea Concepts.
the
2.
e
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the conditional use request at this location. Though it meets three
of the criteria, staff believes that it does not meet the fourth criteria dealing with the effect
upon the character of the surrounding area.
lf the PEC were to evaluate the criteria differently and were to support the request, staff would
recommend that the PEC add two conditions of approval. We believe the structure should be
removed from the site no later than May 1 , 1995 and not be allowed to be reconstructed
without another conditional use review by the PEC; and that the applicant should provide a
parking analysis and return to the PEC to confirm the required number of parking spaces.
clpEc\mem6vadam.822
Liqhn ..r, '- 2 /.Llt-z- t , o*,L, o. 1 .g /ua,,z t t-</, 'r7?-a-xt<s.
?- S -a-"r'...-n^-Lo-t*-'7'7
"H@"
t.,4l2A
ar-
44t-WP t4A aqpL
(
I
I
I
,..,,"4
. a/1 Ng
,1\-
/) ''
l\)')'
\w, l
\-.]
bfrv
\
I \i
'?
..".:l /t'
t \'r7Mwy
\ '\//X #V
/\
/l ,,1 i't\
:A-' wtb-
/-
r. '\'\,/)<\
)1,t'/\/ -\l
/\
..0 &
\
lfyr,tt*l|/'q
Pid!.
&Sqlcr; &
ArtLir.ctt
P.C. A.lJr.
VhtL FtaAeltu:
unWepb t1s,4t
REVISION;
1.zl ?,*N..12c42 Sbcct:
AI o".,"f2L
b*1-141*
I
k
lb.tf
l_J
I+
iu
t-\
\\t _1-
u
b\
+fi
*$
F--r
+
\
REVISIONT -1,zl1.4+
11,34 U"tkHffi 'TAlf'
'-.-FI!Cfr-'..
\:l o
TO: MIKE McGEE
PROJECT: VA
Fire Dept.:
Rwiewed by:
Comments:
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
Dale:
ODD OPPENHEIMER
Fletum to Andv Knudlsen
Town Planner
-^f
DATE SUBMIfiED:DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: fln
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OFTHE PROPOSAL:
Engineering:
Reviewed Ay: lcrn Date:_ 3l!Il!l__
Comments:
No trmtlenlS
Landscaping:
Rwiewed by: Date:
Commenls: .
- rrt-> St
.:
Distributed to the Fire Department, public works. and Landscaprg on e//^ /"/ .
GREG HALL
pRSJECT: V A C h' lc/+o ,, , ii.' t,r / ....f-
GREG HALL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date:
Date:
TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudlsen
Town Planner
/**,,,, .fn '
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
/l f a-tVn, r,,., ../.., , / 1.tt 7-,tt y'o
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: f/r
Engincering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
f- Y,a..r 5,
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:.2c.4cd Dare: #'' 2'27
comments: ,) ,.t/aae/z,,ra,n,.oe 1/Zr'v,//o'-1 zZ .z) ,,zeaJ&/y'/L-s .".- I-Z'r'o5 , ./azr, /--'4t t
J),7dh/'*7" SZP'/ryt
</) 'c/'J '/o" ,;-)nt''L n* 4 zy''<-e'ao -
?2././ / ,/ - ^,- --,,/z.ir{ & 5ot"' ,
t) ///',*'-r 5'/u:J Jzvzn"-/ztN / 5'7"7 //F< 4'zz'J
Distributcd to the Fire Department, public works, and Landscaping on__illn ,/?rr .
6) oc-..Vnt,r-'r ZonJrt 6z/,6/'zJ 6 ,2t 21ry-
/A/-Z )/-o,2...21 t4z A -2..2.-r<-.-6 -
4?6 qr.a Y
I
PRODUCT FEATURES & BENEFITS
FLEXIBILIW Only three structural components - ("A" beam = 88", "B'
beain = 132" and arch curves) allow for direct
interchangeability.
The customer may tailor the Clamshelter's width, height
and length to specific site or application requirements.
EASE/SPEED OF clamshelters with spans of up to 80 feet can be installed
ItlSiALmlOru at rates of 65 square feet per manhour using simple hand
tools.
"'' No cranes, scaffolding or heavy equipment is required to
assist in Clamshelter installation resulting in a cost-
effective installation.
All frame components weigh less than 1OO pounds allowing
two men to lift any Clamshelter part.
STRUCTURAL Designed to withstand 90 to 12O MPH windload and 1O
INTEGRITY to 40 PSF snowload (depending on building sizel.
FRAME MATERTAL
f;:"#L'niJ' i"",l3i?3;j,J3&"i?,"t'#',i'Jfl'l;'fl,,!t"?Si
-l"uJ
aesthetically pleasing.
When comparing 6061 with commonly used 6063, 6061-
T6 offers a 3Oo/o increase in yield strength and between
27o/o and 42o/o increase in other allowable structural
properties.
PRE-ENGINEERED The Clamshelter is pre-engineered to accommodate a OPTIONS of accessory options.
The extruded aluminum frame readily accommodates an
external weathershell as well as an internal insulative or
black-out liner with its multiple "tracks".
The frame is extruded to accomodate electrical cable or
conduit, lighting fixtures, hoists and sprinkler systems
without compromising or altering the aluminum frame.
A range of door systems can readily be installed in any
side bay or flat end.
The Clamshelter is also furnished complete with a rain
gutter system.
CLAMSHELL DOOR
MINIMAL
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
SHIPMENT
Provides clear span, full height access.
Allows free movement of equipment into and out of the
Clamshelter without the restrictions posed with roll-up or
sliding door systems.
Clamshelter's anodized aluminum frames assures a long life
free from corrosion.
Weathershell panels are repaired/replaced individually on
site.
Punctures resulting from careless heavy equipment
operators, for example, are repaired in place with a
Clamshell Buildings, Inc. provided repair kit.
Replacement weathershell panels are installed in one hour
from ground level.
The Clamshelter's interchangeable components afford lower
weight and volume resulting in lower surface shipment
costs, the ability to air freight to remote regions, and
minimal space requirement for inventory.
ctiwp\rnrk.tne\l..lur...p.o
o Frtr gopy
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 8 / 479-21 39
FAX 303-479-2452
August 9, 1994
Departtnent of Conununiry Developtnent
Ms. Beth Levine
Pierce, Segerberg and Associates
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Lionshead Ski School Children's Tent
Dear Beth:
Thank you for your memorandum summarizing our meeting on August 4, 1994. lthink it is
important to reiterate that the Town certainly wants to cooperate with Vail Associates in
providing a high quality skier experience in our community. To that end, we want to support
Vail Associates' effort to improve the Children's Ski School. However, we are concerned
about the appearance of lhe clam shell and I thought that this follow-up letter would help
clarify that concern. Please call me if you or your clients have any questions.
Sincerely,
,/-1, l*l*^
Andy Knudtsen
Senior Planner
xc: Kirk Segerberg
Jack Hunn
Pierce, Segerberg ssociates . Architects . P.C. . A.LA.
o
&A
MEMORANDUM
LU6 C
DAIE:
TO:
COMPAITTY:
IROM:
SUBJEICT:
August 4,lg94
Jack Hunn
Vait & Associates //L
Beth Levine flVT
vY./
Lionshead Ctildren's Tent
Meefing with Andy Knudtsen at
the Town of Yail
' L il
i r., v', ir"i! r/r- rl ir')T.
Andy and I met this morning to discuss the "clamshell" tent for the Children's Ski School
in Lionshead. Andy's initial concerns were the image of the structure and the fact that an
expansion ofthe Children's Ski School hadjust been approved.
Our discussion then focused on the need for an outdoor, heated gathering space to both
enhance the skier experience and help with skier safety and congestion in Lionshead. Andy
said the Town is aware of this need for the community and would be willing to help Vail
Associates.
Andy thought a year-long approval for a temporary structure would be appropriate to
validate the necessity of a structure in that location. Then perhaps a more permanent
structure or approval could be obtained.
Andy's only other concem was if there would be any other items around the structure.
Kurt Segerberg/PsA
Andy Knudtsen/TOv
Main Office:
One Tabor Center
l0O0 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 . 30314'7 6-4433
' I 200 Seventecn(h Street, Suite 515 ' Denver. Colorado 80202 . 303/623-3355
o
TO: MIKE McGEE
INTER.DEPARTM ENTAL B EVI EW
I t,i I -, /
PROJECT: Vft Ch /d+',,r (..c,.{,7' / 'r--,t'
DATE SUBMITTED:DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTSNEEDED av: tfn
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudtsen ffi
E-:t /. .--.*D\r* s-
Landscaping:
Dislributed to the Fire Department, public works, and Landscaping on v/!,/n//?
lnnTo-n-., .\/.", / tk+ f ra ft.. /
Date:
Date:
Date:
Pierce, Segerberg ssociates . Architects .
o
&A
t
P.C . A.I. A.
Vail Associates
Lionshead Childrens' Tent
Vail Associates would like to propose the addition of a new, temporary facility to
complement the childrens' skiing program. This facility would be located next to the Born
Free Express Chair Lift. The facility wilt be a temporary, simple, attractive tent structure.
The Childrens' Tent will be used as a meeting point for the Childrens' Ski School' thus
minimizing the present traffic and congestion in Lionshead. The size and bulk of the tent
shall be of a smaller scale than the Born Free Express and shall be white to blend in with
the winter image. The tent will be a wonderful gathering place for parents and children
alike.
Muin Olfice.' 1000 South Frontage Road West . Vail. Colorado 81657 . 3O31476-4133
One Tabor Cenler . l20O Sevcnteenth Street. Suite 515 . Denvcr. Colorado 80202 . 303/623-3355
!.!
,l
L.J
JUL 2 2 rc94
PmNNl,'li, rriiGN I i0tiSlBiiCfitN
(
(
I
t
^\tA
z'1
A+"
Y
N
l+
is
l+
la!ltl
ss l-
-ffr ;R -fi'r ;-\
k {
\
5 I
0
s
Date
Date
of
of
Appl i cat i on___1r1]v__l!1_lj e'!
PEC Meeting August 22' 1994
Tu\ - C0t'i\\rl\, DE\J' DtPlLrcATroN
FOR CONDITIONAL USE P
I.This procedure is required for any project requir
use Permit' Tn\j nnr,
The apptication wiu not be accepted untit alr inrdHilst{oUI\iMtDEIi0EP:1",
ADDRESS o. ".rZ
v^tr.. cn Rl6qn PHONE 303-479-3012
B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Architects, P.C. , A.I.A.
ADDRESS 1000 S.,Frontaqe Road West' suite i00. vai'l - eo Pl6su
PHoNE476-4433
a NAME OF 0WNER(S) (print or tYPe)ASSOCTATES, rNC.
ol,JNER(S)' SIGNATURE(S)
P.O. BOX 7
ryqm
g ffiit{fntal
A.
t
oEUti ?
NME 0F APPLICANT Vatl 4esggia
ADDRESS
vArL, co 8r6s8
OF PROPOSAL. LEGAL: LOT BLOCK F ILING
PHoNE 303-479-38L2
D.LOCAT I ON
ADDRESS Vail Lionshead lst Tri l i nrr lTr.ar-t 1\r r+ !rrY
E. FEE $ZOO PAID X
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE
ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
cK tlw ",4!ftJ'€3{?'" , +"="ciares
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT }IILL
adjacent to the subiect ProPertY
and their ma'l1lng addresses'
Ot.lNERS ANO CORRECT ADDRESSES.
F. A list of the names of owners of all PIgP-gIly
iHciuorllo pRoPERTY BEHIND AND AcRoss srREETs'
ini-nFFttcnNT bllLL BE RESPoNSIBLE F0R coRREcT
\-II. PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE hIITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
T0 DETERMTNE rr-[ni-[boiiionnl TNFoRMATToN IS NEEDED. N0 APPLIcATIqI! llLL-
BE AccEPTED uNLE3'i'Ii-ii'idiPiEiE il'iusi-iHcluor ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY-T-HE-zoNING
ioNiHiirinion).--ir-is-iHinppLlcaHi'i-nEipoHSrBLrTy.To_MKE AN APP0INTT'IENT
tlITH THE sTAFF T0 iIND oui nso[i nooirtOHRu susl4ITTAL REQUIREMENTS'
PLEASE NoTE THAT A C0MPLETE APFIicATi0N U!': :il!$!illi IIE^llP"EKt
ibh^ibuii"pnoiiii iiv-oEmCESrHe iir NUMBER 0F coNDIrIoNs 0F AP
PEC I4AY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL }'IUST BE
BUILDING PERMIT IS IsS'UED.
PROCESS
THAT THE
EFORE A
.-N
(ovER)1$'N
o o
TOWN OFVAIL *rr*orno.- fusQ
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEI/ELOPMENT
bAPe
CHECKS MADE TAYABLE TO TOWN OF VAIL
ITEM !a_TAL_
01 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $s.00
01 0000 42415 L'NIFORM BUILDING CODE $50.00
01 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBINGCODE $36.00
01 000042415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $32.00
01 0000 4241s UNIFORMFIRECODE $36.00
0r0m042415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE $30.00
010000 4241s OTIIER CODE BOOKS
01 0000 415,18 BLUEPRIN.I5 (MYLARS)s7.00
0LfiJ0o42412 XEROXCOPIES $0.25
ol0w0 42412 STUDIES
0t0000424t2 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM $5.00
0l 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTIONS
01 0000 41332 PLAN REVIEW RE_CHECK FEE I$40 PER HR.I
0rmnrJ4?332 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
01 00fi) 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
010m041413 ffi-$20.00
0l 0000 41413 ADD]TIONAL SIGNAGE FEE I$I.OO PER SQ.FI.I
0tw(n42440 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
01 0m0 41331 PRE PA'D DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE
01 0M 42371 I}.IVESTIGATION FEE (BUILDII{G)
31 0000 45110 TOVPARKINGFUND
0to0fo22a27 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPENSER FUND | 01 0000 21112 TAXABLE @ 4% (STATE)
' 01 ffnO 41010 TAgBLtr@Z% (TOWN)
01 uno 42371 BUILDING INVESTIGATION
OTI{ER
0l 00004f390 $200.00 A
01m0Q413-CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT s200.00 rA)U-a
01 fino4xl30.EXTERIOR ALTERATION ILESS TFIAN 1OO SQ.FI..I $200.00
01 00m 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION IMORETHAN IOO SQ.FT.I $500.00
01 0000 41330 sPEeatDEvEtrpNiENT D-rsrRlcr tNEwl $1,s00.00
01 0000 41330 SPETIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMAJOR AMEND $1,000.00
01 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMINOLAI4END $200.00
01000041330 SUBDIVISION
01 0000 41330 VARIANCE $250.00
01 0000 41330 ZONINGCODEAMENDMENTS $250.00
01 0000 41330 RE - ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER
ITOTN-: z/vu .
COMMENTS:
, / t fd/
*t"r r.*or 4fil "'^q:b+T ]REC.8\, Y
'ftE TCRBERG & ASSOC.lfrLTEcftl, P.c.. A.t.A.
THE - -.D._ET4Ctt AND RETATN TH|S STATEMENT \GHEE| CHECK I' IN FAYMEIYI OF |YEr'S DEICFIE'O 9E )RRECT FLEA.E NOI|FY UA PROMFTLY. NO R€CEIPT E'E!'I
DELUXE . FORM wvc.3 V.2
DESCRIPTION
7 /22/94 529.00
AMOUNT
200. 00
PEC Fee - VaiI Associatesr Tent
Project 18046.00
TAl'rU.{ AF LrFl I l-
Fliscel laneors Cash
14: Er?:59
F:{,,:*:f-il + i=f,43f
iii'::i'i-:i-ri ,;+ l::1,:: #
._ i. L:.1..:, : r-rr!:la:tsiE l'it
": i :,i: :; i
i:jaji:',-ii: t i.::,i1,:.1* i-ird l
I t eiri paid
,:rl. iii_:lrX4 l. lli;i:rfilr
i: i:;::i'i*i:' i ii: l.: if JiB,j ':.
i +itJ
{i tr5!:8f,'.f,r_tftf,ITloNf,L us
:BB, SE
trroun l paid
3BB. BE
F. SS
-rHfll.{}< l/SLf
ri,:';-.rr c.l5:hi * r HEItTI
t
*k*x.'
TOWN OFVAIL u b88/R.ECEII/T NO-
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
C}IECXS MADE PAYABLE IO TOWN OP VAIL
ACOOI'}{T NO.ITEM NO. TAX COSTE,I. 1DTAL
0t 0000 41540 ZONINGAN-DADDRESSMAPS $5.00
01 0000 42415 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE s50.00
0r 0000 4241s UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE s36.00
01 0000 42.115 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE s32.00
01 0000 42415 UN]FORMFIRECODE s36.00
01 0000 42415 MTIOMTELEtrRICAL CODE ti30.00
01 000042415 I-OTFIEREOD-E BOOKS
0r 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS (MYLARS)s7.00
or 000042412 XEROXCOPIES s0.25
otomo 4?.412 STUDIES
ot oo00 424t2 ffi $5.00
0l 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES / RE_]NSPECTIONS
0l 0000 413-12 PLANTEVTEW RETHECK FEE I$40 PER HR.I
0t 0000 42332 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
01 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
0l 0000 41413 TI6NAPPLICATION FEE s20.00
01 0000 41413 ADDI'ilONALSJGNACE FEE JSI.OO PER SQ.FT.I
010000 42440 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
01 00002tl331 IPRE PAI'-ESICNREVIEW BOARD FEE ?nn'
019ffio4-2-571 I]WESTIGAT]ON FEE (BUILDI NC )
31 0000 45110 TOVPARRN6FUNT
orNoj22m7 ffiRFUND r 01 0000 21112 TAXABLE @ 4Va (STATE\
* 0l 000041010 T/wlE'EE@ 4c/; (TOWN)
0l 0000 42371 BUILDING lNTVESTIGAT]ON
OTHER
01 0000 41330 AM s200.00
01 0000 41330 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT s200.00
01 0000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION ILESS THAN IOO SQ.E]$200.00
0l 0000 41330
-XTERIOR
ALTERATION TMORE THAN rcQ!Q.FTI-s500.00
0l 0000 41330 ffiTRICT INEWI $1J00.00
01 0000 41330 ffitSTBIqT$44IoB_4MENP $1.000.00
0l 000041330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IM]NOR AMFND $200.00
01 0000 41330 SUBDIVISION
01 0000 41330 VARIANCE $250.00
01 0000 41330 ffi $2s0.00
0l 0000 41330 RE - ZONING s200.00
OTHER
OTHER
lTo-t-AL: ;4O0 ,
COMMENTS:
CASHr ,r**, Lt' 7 49 I "",-LZS,(t "*""r//(/(u
PIERCE, SEGERBERG & ASSOC.
ARCHITECTS. P.C,. A.I.A,
DETACH AND RETAIN
ri il ?["?,"i.?"": J"" J+,:ilj:'sJ"i;r":' "".*"":+"';""35t
DELUXE . FORM VWC.3 V-2
DATE
7 /22/e4
DRB Fee - Vail Associatesr Tent
Project 18046. 00
${,
li::_ji'; L-rF t-.-:F+ I L-
i .:;.:+ 1 i.:-t ':,-,= il =:=h
.i {. ,' l.:l;:; i *+!
: ::: : . ' . i ; -irrFi l[., [rF:Ej
,,:i:t:r, t-:ltl
i:rili,tun t F,.3id
!:1" Eitl
-: i'.!=i'Ii=:: '-.r * l-l
DESCRIPTION
..,,.r.1
ll
I
200. 00
F rtt .)ttt
I
I
rf
^-l I
o
F'
. i-;
\'\'l\
u"*
tF
rl*
H.
l,l
til
t1
H-l Il h. I hl l-l
l--.1 $l
FI l+l t\ |
l'l
IS
lil lil ttl
6Jl FI ,l v)l
3l
NI t.l lt ll
EF
=3 E?l'3 lF il tl (Dl *-t I N tvi I t\*- I
I
a
D.
DRB APPLICAIION - TOWN OF \Ttrfl., COI,ORADO
Or.oi". d glAlgL
.luly 25 , L994 DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
B
Auqust 17, 1994
t*********
TIIIS APPLICATION WTLL NOT BE ACCEPTED
I'NTIL AIL REQUIRED INFORT.N,EION IS SI'BMITTED ******tt**
PROJECT INFORMATION:
DESCRIPTION:
X New Construction ($200.00)00)
Addit.ion ($50.00)Conceptual Review (S0)
ADDRESS: Vail Lionshead 1st Filino, Tract D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOt Block
Subdivision Vail Lionshead 1st Filing, Tract D
If property is described by a meets and bounds legal
description, pfease provide on a separate sheet and
attach to this aDpl-ication.
F.
ZONING; Commercial- Core II
LOT ARSA: If required,
qf :mnaal <rr rrrarr ql'_.rowlng
applicant must
'I ^r
provroe a current
NAME OF
Me i I i nrr
APPLICANT:
Address:
Vail As sociates
Phone
PIERCE, SEGEP.PEPG &
\] A MF NE'
Mailing
APPLTCANT'S REPRESENTATIVE. AF.CI{]TECTS, P.C. , A.
Address:1000 S. Frontage noaffi
rt^ .i 1 a\ a\v o. _L -l- , \- \-,/t 1.65-1
NAME OF OWNERS:VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC.
*SIGNATURE (S) :Mailing Address:
J.
VATT., crr Rr 65fr Phone
Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at
the time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when
:nnlvincr fnr : l'lrri lrii ncr nprmit. nlc:qe iclpntifw th6 APP.L I accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of V
wilI adiust the fee accordi.nq to the table belo
ensure t-he correct fee is paid.
FEE PAID:
ASSOCIATES
TA
H.
FEE SCHEDULE:
\,'ALUATION
I 0 - $ 10,000 s 10,001 - I 50,000
$ 5C,00i - $ 150,000
$15'l ,0ir1- - $ 500,0C0
$500,cc1 .- $1,000,0c0 $ Ov-er $1,000,Ct)0
* DESTGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVEI EXPIRES
APPROVAI., MU.ESS A BUILDING PESMIT IS
STARTED.
ONE YE,AR AT'TEP. FINAJ,
ISSUED ATD CONSfRUCTION
FRE l, 2u.0c $ .rC.00
$100.00
$2CC.00
$4!0.00
ss00.00
TYPE OF REVIEW:
200.00
4 74>t
*iNO APPLISi\TION I'ILI, BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OI{NER'S SIGNATUPS
IS
llf{ lZ'
Va.'u Ltor" s H fi-A-D 3 pp Fre r'rc6 "fnp<-r A SUBD IVI S ION
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK
ADDRESS
U.S. West Communications
r-800-922-1 9 8 7
468'6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
94 9-57 81
Gary HaII
Holy Cross Electric Assoc,
949-5892
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.V.
94 9-ss30
Steve Hiatt
Upper EagIe Valfey Water
& Sanitation District *
4'16-'7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE:
FILING --I-Tz-nac-T A
T-.-tL.r L./ l\l:r r-) .J -fiTffi'o;*
The Iocation and availability of utilities, whether they be main
trunk lines or proposed fines, rnust be apProved and verified by
the following utilities for the accompanying site p1an.
Authorized Siqnature Date M
/'tl'r/
This form is to verify service availability and
location. This should be used in conjunction with
preparing a utility plan and scheduling
insta]lations.
7 -26- 7q
For any new constructlon proposal, the applicant
must provide a completed utility verification
form.
If a utility company has concerns with the
proposed construction, the utility rePresentative
should note directly on the utility verification
form that there is a problem which needs to be
resoLved. If the issue is relatively complicated'
it should be spelled out in detail in an attached
letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep
in mind that it is the responsibility of the
utility company and owner to resolve identified
problems . .,
If the utj.lity verj-fication form has signatures
from each of the utility cornpanies, and no
comments are made directly on the form, the Town
will presume that there are no problems and that
the development can proceed.
These verifications do not relieve the contractor
of his responsibility to obtain a street cut
permit fron Lhe Town of Vail, Department of Public
works and to -gbtain utilitv lo .re
di.crqinq in any public right-of-way or eas{:ment
the Tcwn of Vait A buildinq permit is .qot a
sEreet cut pernit. A st-reet- cut permit must ile
obt.aine,J separately .
* Please bring a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when
obtaining Upper Eagle Valley water e Sanitation sj-gna'-ures. Fire
f low necds ro\.lst be addressed.
.t.
I
- le-
i frrsr c= l,^eleere:s
NAME OF pROJECT. Vail ,Associates - l-,ionshead Childrens Tent
DESCRIPTfON: LOT BLOCK SUBDIVI S ION
Lion ead 3rd F i-in
LEGAL
STREET ADDRESS: !E!1
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Vail Associates - Lionshead Childrens'Tent
The following information is
Review Board before a final
A. BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wa}} Materials
Fascia
Sof f its
Vlindows
Window Trlm
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl-ues
F I ashings
ChlmneYS
Trash Enclosur': s
Greenhouses
nt-har
High strength PVC fabric
required for submittal
approval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAL
Lo the Design
LU LUTA
White
Itigh strength PVC fabric White
LANDSCAP ING :Name of Designer:
Phone:
None
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botanical Name Common Name Ouantitv Size*
EXIST]NG TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*rndicate caliper for deciduous trees ' Mini'mur! calie?E for
a."iauoli it""i i"-i-i".rtu"' rndicate height r9t-ggliferous
Structure is ligbt-vteight
aluminum
l- raaq
\ PLANT MATERTAO Botanical Name Co^^or., 1,. ouantitv Siz,e*
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*fndicate size 5 qaIloj.of proposed shrubs
.-
Mj-nimum size of shrubs is
Square Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRTGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the Iighting plan on the List below and provide the wattage, height above grade and type of light proposed.
None
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pooIs, etc.) Pl-ease specify. lndicate heights of retaining walls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback is 3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property is 5 feet.
None
ZONE CHECK
T TJi(
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
DATE: .lu1y 25, 1994
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot
ADDRESS. Lionshead 3rd
Block
Filing, Tract A
OWNBR Vail Associates PHONE 479-3143
PIERCE, SEGERBERG & ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECT ARCHITEETS. P.C., A.I.A.PHONE 416-4433
ZONE DISTRfCT Aqricultural and Open Space
PROPOSED USE Temporary Tent
* *T.t1T qT7tr
Allowed
(30) (33)
Exi st inq Proposed Total
16 | -1"
I,260 1,260
Height
TOtal GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks
lZJ
425
Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course Setback
(if o 1-nrrararra
T,anrlcnrrri ner
Retaining Wall Heighls
Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
View Corridor Encroachment:
Envi ronment al.,/Haz ards :
3t /6'
Reqrd
(3oo) (600) (900) (1200)_
Permitted Slope 8% Actual Slope
Date approved by Town Engineer:
20,
r,5,
15'
(30) (s0)
/
1- ,260
Yes
1\
2)
3)
No ??? X
Flood Plain
Percent Slope
Geologic Hazards a) Snow Avalanche b) Rockfall c) Debris Flow 4) Wetlands
Previous conditions of approval (check property file)
Does this request involve a 250 Addition? No
How much of the al-]owed 250 Addition is used wj.th this request.?
'i'tNote: Under Sections L8 .12.090 (B) and 18,13.080 (B) of the Municipal Code, lots zoned Two Farnily and Primary,/Secondary which are Less than 15,000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The
Comrnunity Development Department nay grant an exception to this restriction provided t.he applicant meets the criteria set. forth under Sections 18 .1.2. 090 (B) and j.8.13.080 (B) of the Municipat Code including permanentry restricting the unit as a long-term rent.al unit for furf-tirne employees of the Upper Eagle ValJ_ey.
10
.rr"-B
Prbject Application
Date
5/,,t t'proiect Name: (fL/ &/F !4tf/ 6p n/tz/'r /l ';' f% .{,af;'<'t .L1"
Project Description:/,
conracr person and ,non" fu'u/E/6 fza,+fVT/,, l/1r.:'Ttr4lti r/ht'lilz?-
lEt/.5D 6// y'rry6--t' f', /t,r r? .q//€ 7 //d 7qfr"
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
5futftT /44rvf - y'l /V/ Lt,4.7E
Block F rling
2N/'ftt-t,ui
Legal Descriplion: Lot Zone
-
Com menls:
Design Review Board
o^r" //r/'/qq
?nt-r Motion by:
Seconded by:/i.i;t t!y'a5
.'''a;i iiiit ^Wt.",4 r 7,1rr'/r. irrt-',/-c,
summary: * 7Z r'r' f'*",n Ez i')z
D ISA PPR OVA L
, TolYn Plan ner
Dut"t ,-'.12 " "l'""3
,,i;,,/..
E Statt Approval
1
I AppLrcATroN DAIE S- Z/'93
SXGN/AWNING APPLTCATION
(Please Print or TyPe)
NAME oF pRoJEcr l,t?-P/R L,+c.f t'nrts't sn,u'JoJ;o'" D's4";tl'
?HoNE_1J&L
NAME oF pERsoN SUBMITTING /n-Le/o Fl=l-", L/ PHjNE3Z.3E@
ADDRESS
NA],IE OF
ADDRESS
OWNER
SIGNATURE
LOCATION OF
DESCRIPTION (J! Tr(tJUlJ\- I
THE FOLIOWING INFORMATION IS REOU]RED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE
APPLTCANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD.
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE
PROJECTING, ETC) ,
SIGN/AWNING (FREE STANDING, WALL,
INCLUDE SIGN MESSAGE.
OF OI{NER
PROJECT
,/t,"SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL
C. SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO
n r1rrrbnt ur
lJtlJUtl-Lrfl:J LIGHTING (EXISTING OR PROPOSED)
t.
z.
6.
X.
x.
r'l
LENGTH OF BUSINESS FRONTAGE 1911 /5O If
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL (ATTACH)
FEE: $20.0^0 PLUS 51.00 PEB SQUARE
PAIr4 :t)'7 cHEcK No. (jlA^-
FOOT OF SIGN
DATE -5 1
t-Sile Plan
Elevations showing exact location of sign or
awning on the building
Photographs showing proposed location
Colored scale drawing
Sample of proposed materials
Photograph of sign if available
OVER
7
T
F
t TO: SIGN APPLICANTS
When applications for signs are submitted, the following information is required:
1. A conpleted sign/awning application (attached) .
2. A site plan showing the exact location where the sign is to be located.
3. A photograph if possible and building elevation showing the location of the proposed sign.
4. A scaled drawing whj.ch details the design of the si.gn,as follows:
(a) Colored exactly ag sign will be.(b) A List of rnaterialsl to be used in sign (metal,
wood, canvas, painti, etc. )(c) Photograph of sign \f available.(d) Specific lettering style and size.
5. ff an awning is proposed, subrnit drawings showing
exactly how and where t,he awnj.ng is attached to Lhe
building and how the awning is to be constructed.
6. Description of light,ing that will be used in
conjunction wiLh the sign or awning'. If proposing an
awning, Iighting is not. allowed to shine through lhe
entire awning which calls undue attention to the
business. Lighting may spotlight only the actual sign
lettering on the awning.
RECOM}4ENDATIONS OR PO]NTERS
1. Check sign code - verify site, height etc.
2. Be specific. Vagueness on design, size, construcLion may
delay the approval of your sign.
3. Measure frontage of business.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE TII4E OF APPLTCATION
SUBMITTAL.
If this application requires a separate review by any local,
State or Federal agency other than t,he Town of Vai1, the
applicat.ion fee shall be increased by $200.00. Bxamples of such
review, may include, but are noL ]imited to: Colorado Department
of Highway Access Perrnits, Army Corps of Engineers 404r etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees
which are in excess of 50% of the application fee. If, at the
applicant's reguestr dny mat.t,er is postponed for hearing, causing
the matter to be re*published, then. the entire fee for suctr re-publication shall- be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed hy the Community Development Department to
have significant design, Iand use or other i.ssues which may have
a significant impact on the cornmunity may require review by
consultants other that town staff. Should a determi-nation be
made by the Lown staff that an outside consultant j"s needed to
review any application, Community Development may hire an outside
consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to
pay him or trer and t.his amount shall be forwarded to the Town by
Lhe applicant at the time he files his application with the
Comrnunity Development. Department. Upon complet.ion of the review
of the application by the consul-tant' any of the funds forwarded
by the applicant for payment of the consultant. which have noL
been paid to the consultant shall be returned to the applicant.
Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of l:he amount forwarded
by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicanL
within 30 days of notification by the Town.
I
I
ET TtO Aa "zo N,,mFt tn
d
E t
C T T'
r-
I'1
--l
--l
F p
tn
\
F ftr
Fl X
H
tn
{
H z
IJi
a
z
--l
-l
-o z
Cf
-a
-l fl
-c)J t:
-f3<- r" F6-r*
i11
r1 j HP ZQ HR
SH - rrl
U
m T
rfl
o r m
r r
rn
1-@ rS lo)
T1 o
*;D 6-m -a
1-l
]s o
-cf
I
ul n
.5
UI
Ul o
r F
It
+t r}.
:
--)-
/
33^5" x
./
Uppea Eacle Veltey Cor.rsotroareo
SerurrerroH DrsrRrcr
846 FOFEST FOAO. VA|L. COLORAOO 81657
(3C3) 476-7440. FAX (3O3) 476-4089
I,TEMORANDUU
TO: To\^rn of VaiI
Design Review Board
FROM: Gordon "Hawkeye" Flaherty, Maintenance Manger
DATE: May 2L, 1993
SUBJECT: Sign for Upper Eagle VaIIey Consolidated Sanitation
District Offices
We would like to have the attached logo which hre are adding to our
existing sign, reviewed by your committee.
We are going to place it on Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District Offices located at 846 Forest Road, VaiI,
CoIorado.
If you have any questions please contact me at 476-7480 ext. 34
HF: s1d
\'rp5 1 \todd\ ev- 8 lgn . !€e
Attachment
MANAoER FoR TttE FoLLowtNo WaTER DtaTnlcTa:
AAFOWI]EAO METFO WAI:F . AEAVEq CREEK METRO WATEB. BEFRY CFEEK METBO WATER
EAGLE.VAIL METAO WATEF . EOWAAOS METRO WATER . LAKE CREEK MEAOOWS WATEB
UPPER EAGLE REGIONAL WATEF AUTUOFITY . VA L VALLEY CONSOLIDATEO WATER N
TOWN OF VA]L
D E P A R T;\{ E N* T O F C O ivl lvl LiN ITY D E V E L O P }1 E N T'
S.\LES ACTION FOR:\'t
tct 75 SOUTH
VAIL, CO
ZCI\T\|G .tu\D A D DR.ESS !'iAtS 0t 0000 4t540
UNf.':OL\{ B IILDI''G COD E 0l ff\?o424t5
U MFOR.\{ PLUY;E DJG CODE 0t 0000..2415
uNr FoR\.t lwEcHAl.'lcr.L coDE 0l co00 42.{15
UNIFOF-\{ FIRE CODE 0l c'ocoJ24t5
0r 0,300 42{ l5N,\TiONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
0l 00@{24t5 ontER coDE looKs
BLUE PR$ITS OIYLA 0t 0000.1154s
or ooc|t 424 r 2 I >tERox coplEs / s'iuDiEs s0.25 |
0t 00co{237t PENAI.TY FEES / RE.L\*SPECTIONS
0r occo.{ r 332 i pL,rx nEvtEv RE.cuEcK FEE [s-(0 FER HR.
0l 00Cr0 42323 OFF HOURS NSPECTION FEES
CONT:L\CTORS LICL\s ES FEES 0l 0000.1l{ l2
SICN APPL!CA]]ON FEE
0l (800 { 11.30
.0t c\?30 11413
ADDITIONA'. SIGNAGE t;E I5I.o) PER, SQ.IT.0t 00004t4r3
0t moc 12.110 }TC ART PROJECT DONA]ION
0t 0cs0 .l r 33 t PRE P/AJD DESIGN REVIEIVBOARD FEE
oI 00)042412 I BuIIOINC-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI
*.0r 0000 41010 TAx
0r 0000 42371 TNVESTTGATToN FEE (BUTLDTNG) TOTAL DUE:
0t 0000 { 13
ltoN trioRETHl"r,l 100 so.FT.
0l 0000 .r 1330
{E.\rT DISTRICT I }.'IINOR 0000d1330 rSPEC
| 00014 t 330
tc
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
I
I
I,
j
\*r
t i
."f
g --.', 1-.""'.
Permit Numbers
IIOW PAID--Cash Y Check_
Police Receipt Numbers ----.,, ..- --- -r--T--
_By -.," /.' .' 't "'-" r \.- -'
ToldN oF*;;;;
f'fiEceI leneous CBEh
s5-t4-9I I I : ?4:37
E
Fl*c*ipt * l:f,€tg+
Fl;c,:,un t #
L! Fl,r$f' '.,5I81.] RFF
Rinr,:_rn 1. ten,Jsred i
Iten p:i d
fi1fifjfiEr4t 4tf,ffLtB
ih.:ing* r* t,-rrnFd :'
THFth,tl<
32.86
Fnowrt paid
f,3. A6
6. EB
1ftfu
\J,rur cashier .IUFV
; PLIASE MAKE
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPART;\{ENT OF COIVI]VILNITY DEVELOP}IENT'
S^tES ACTION FOR}{
75 SOUT}T FRONTAGE ROAD
L, C0L0MD0 81657
ZCNT\O tu\lD ADDRESS l'tAls 0t 00004t510
LINT.TO L\ { B UILDL.'*G CO D E 0l c{00424r5
U M FOR.\,I PLUVA L\* G C OD E 0l 0000{24t5
uM [OL\ | ]!tEC H]-\']C/. L CO D E 0t 000042.{r5
0l OrCC0l24l5 UNITOR,\{ FIRE CODE
N,\TIONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE 0t 0co042{r5
OTIIER CODE EOOKS
BLUE PRL{TS OIYLAI(S)
0l 0000 {24 | 5
0t 0000{1543
0t 0000{2112 | >:raox coPIEs/s'iuDEs
0l 00co4237t PENA I,TY FEES / R
=.bIS
PECTIONS
ot c8co.rt3i2 i PL,I"VRevlnvRE-CHEcKFEE, ts<oFERHR.l
0t 00co 42323 OFF IIOURS NSPECTION FEES
CONTII.\ CTORS L'CE\S EJ FEES 0t 0000.{l{t2
0l 0000{r330 OT}IER I.TES
SIGN APPLICATiON FEE .0t 0000 4 t4 r 3
ADDITION^I, SIGNAGE EE ISI.OO;'ER, SQ.IT.0r 00c64!{t3
0l ccoo r2{.t0 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
PRE PAJD DESICN REVIE1V BOARD FEE 0t 0cs0 1r 331
BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI 0t 0o3o424L2
*.01 0000 41010 TAx
0l 0000 4237r TNVESTTGATToN FEE (BUTLDTNG)TOTAL DUE:
0t 0000{1330
I c9ct04t330
0l 00c0.1t3-10 OR ALTCRAION IIIORE THic.\t ICO SO.Ff.
0l 0000a1336 . t5p
0t crc00 .r 1330 | zoNTNG coDE r,.,vE\Dl'J
0l 0000 4l
*
*
*
tc
*
*
*
*
*.
TBhrH c'F-;;;.--=--
l"fi scel I aneor.rs Castr
ff5-:4_Ff,II:16t66
Hs':eiF,r. * i:f,8:rl
fi,;r11rr_r1i. # fl;
EF: Ir.t 5 II.]F5|JH...F,EE
ilfrrt,Lrrr t, l,*ndg re,:j
Item paid
E1i;ltriig4:, f,f,i ffEg
l--i;.=nge FF t Lrrned )
# ?4,$1
PAIII LreE
"I 26.89
hour? peid
zA.gB
€1. ffE
-t-HFtF.tl< vou
Tq,r-rr- c.3=--hier JLID?
RECETVEDFROM i
ADDRESS
N9 4?835
I i'1 I
rl
r
F. "t
!
I
i
$ t c u0
Police Receipt Mrmben HOW PAlt!-Cash,-'-Check
By
Uppen Elcle Vallev Coxsottoareo
Snrurrarron Dtstntcr
a46 FOFEST FOAD . VAtL, COLOBAOO 81657
(3C3) 476-7480. FAX (303) 476-4089
June 8, L992
llr. Dan Stanek Bulldlng Inspector c/o Town of VaiI
75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657
fltf'f JUN 1 21992'
Re: Upper Eagle valley Consolldated Sanitation Distrlct
Administration Of fice Expansion
Dear Dan:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on Monday'
June 1, L992. Answers to your questions are as follows:
1. Requested valuatlon on:I Plumbing $13,000 Mechanical $76,000 Electrical $23,000
2. Information needed on the mechanical room is shown on M-1, M-2'
M-3 and M-4. The roof units are shown on M-4.
3. The guard rails shown on sheets 6 and 7 have the spacing at 4"
maximum required by code. AI1 exterior guard rails shown on sheet
14 are spaced at L'-0". We understand this spacing is allowed by
code for exterior guard rails.
4. The details of the Men's and hlomen's lavatories are shown on the
new sheet 18 (which I've enclosed as part of addendum three (3)
for your revievr). Enclosed are copies of the three addenda that
have been released since applylng for the bullding permit.
5. Enclosed please find three copies of sheet 15 wlth original
stamps.
Should you have any further questions, please contact me.
Thanks !
a
GG: at
Enclosures
Slncerel]4,
&ht/$nED Gayi[e Grider Project Manager
MaNAoEF FoR THE FoLLowrNo WATER DrsrRrcrs:
AFFOWHEAD METBO WATEF . BEAVER CREEK METFO WATER . BERFY CREEK METFO WATEFI
EAG LE-yAli MErFO WATEB. EOWAFTDS METFiC WATEA. LAKE CBEEK EADOWS WATER
up[ore FEG oNAL wATEB AUTHoRrry . varL vALLEy coNS[eo wore.vu N
Town of Vail
25 South Frontage Road
VaiI, Colorado 8l-657 (303) 479-2L38
Plan anafysis based on
the 1991 Uniforn Building Code
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a cornplete
J-isting of alf possibte code requirements in the 1991 UBC. ft is a guide to
selected sections of the code.
Project Number: 051192
Address: 846 FOREST RD.
Contractor: MARCAL CONST.
Architect: ISOM & ASSOC.
Enqineer: ENGINEERING DESIGNWORKS
SEPARAT]ON
DIRECTION BOI'NDARY AREA INCREASE
NORTH Public way 116.0 Feet
EAST Public way l-18.0 Feet
SOUTH Property line l-22.0 Feet
WEST Building 107.0 Feet
Area increased 100.008 for open area on
NAME OCC MAX FLR
Name: UEVCSD Date: June LL, L992
Occupancy: B2rA3
Type of Const: V-1HR
Plans Examiner: DAN S?ANEK
TL
FIRE PROTECTION
85.0 Feet
93.0 Feet
122.0 Feet.
F ? O F'aaf
4 sides.
AREA A]-,LOWED RATTO STATUS
2 Future Office 2 Office #15 2 General Manager #1?2 Secretarial Office 2 QL\er Occupancy
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 1 Vestibule #1 1 Office #2 1 Office #3 L Mechanical Room #5 1 Storage Roorn #6 L Conference Room #?1 Office #8 1 Office #9 L Storage Room #10 L Ladies Room #11 L Mens Room #12 1 PubLic Meeting Room 1 Other Occupancy
TOTAL FOR FIOOR
BUILDING TOTAL
The actual height of this
The maximum height of the
92 ok B2 ok 82 ok
82 ok 82 ok
92 ok 92 ok BZ ok 82 ok 82 ok 82 ok BZ ok 82 ok 82 ok 92 ok 82 ok 43 ok 82 ok
building is
building is
1790 1_6000 0.11 232 r"5000 0.01 305 16000 0.02 497 16000 0.03 s48 16000 0.03 3372 1-5000 0.2t 39 r_6000 0.00 L62 16000 0.01 t't'l r-6000 0 .0r-68 16000 0.00 2r r-6000 0-00 282 1_6000 0.02 t-84 r_6000 0.0r.r_33 16000 0.01 49 16000 0.00 L30 16000 0.0L 11-8 16000 0.0r-993 r"2000 0.08 99r- 1_6000 0.06 3347 t_4560 0.23 6't)-9 30498 0.22
26.0 feet.
40.0 feet. -- Table
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
5-D
Page 2
EXTERIOR WALL FIFA RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 17-A & Table 5-A
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WAI,L PROT
BZ Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
A3 Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Obr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTIBLE material-. Sec .22QL.
None -- No fire protection requirements for openings.Prot -- Openings are to be proLected with 3/4 ht fire assemblies. 50* of the
area of the walL maximum. Sec. 504.(b) & Sec.2203. & Table 5-A
Maxinum single window size is 84 sq.ft with no dimension greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wal1.* -- These walls may be required to have a parapet wal-1 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet wall is required to have the same fire rating as the wall. See section 1710. for details and exceptions.
OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS TablE 17_A ELEMENT MATERTAL RATTNG NOTES fnterior Bearing wall Any 0 hr Interior nonbrg wall Any 0 hr
Structural Frame Any 0 hr Exterior Struct Frame Any 0 hr See footnote #1 Shaft Enclosure Any t hr Floor,/ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr Roof/Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr Stairs Any None
NOTE: See Sec. 1706. (a) for Shaft Enclosure exceptions.
FOOTNOTES:1) Elements in an exterior wa1l located where openings are not permitted or
where protection of openings is required, shal1 be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the
structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table L7-A, fooLnote I
DRAFT STOPS:If there is combustible construction in the floor,/ceiling assembly, draft
stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not
exceed L000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops
does not exceed 50 feet. -- Sec. 25L6. (f)4.A. (iii)
If there is conbust.ible construction in the roof,/ceiling assemb.l-y, draft
stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not
exceed 3000 sguare feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops
does not exceed 60 feet. -- Sec.25L6.(f)4.B.(iii)
OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS -- Table 5-B
B2-A3 Ohr
ADDIT]ONAL SEPARATIONS
FOR A3 and 82 OCCUPANCIES:A thr occupancy separation is required around
central heating unit greater than 400' 000
EXIT REOUIREMENTS:FL NAME OCCUPANT NUMBER EX]T
LOAD REQUIP€D WIDTH
Page 3
rooms containing a boiler or
BTU input.
PANIC RATED DOOR NOTES
HDWR CORRIDOR SWING
2 Future Office 2 Office *LG 2 General Manager #1-7 2 Secretarial Office 2 Other Occupancy
TOTAL L Vestibule #1 l- Office #2 1 Office #3 l- Mechanical Roon #5 1 Storage Room #6 1 Conference Room #7 1 Office #8 1 Office #9 1 Storage Room #10 1- Ladies Room #Ll-1 Mens Room #12 1 Public Meetinq Room 1 Other Occupancy
TOTAL
18 1 2L 31 5r.
5I
JJZ 01_2L 2'L 01 0r-l-9 r_2L 11 01
11
TL 662 10 L 104 2
0.3 No No 0.0 No No
0.1 No No 0.1 No No
0.1 No No
0.8 No Yes
0.0 No No
0.0 No No 0.0 No No
0.0 No No 0.0 No No
0.3 No No 0.0 No No 0.0 No No 0.0 No No 0.0 No No 0.0 No No
1.1 Yes Yes
0.2 No No 1.7 Yes Yes
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R
N/R Out 4
N/R
Out
Rated corridors are to have Lhr fire prolection on both sides of walls and
ceiling. -- Sec. 3305. (S) Door openings are required to be protected.
with 20 minute assemblies and window openings are required to be protected
with labe]-ed 3/4 hour assemblies. -- Sec. 3305. (h)
fn areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is L/2
maximum diagonal of the area or floor. -- Sec. 3303. (c)
Exit signs are required from all areas serving an occupant load of
-- Sec. 3314. (a)
Door swing is based on Sec. 3304. (b) except as noted.
Occupant load is based on Table 33-A.
of the
50 or more
Number of exits is based on Table 33-A except as noLed.Exit width is in feet and based on Sec. 3303. (b) .
Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits.width shown for all areas is based on other exits. (0.2)
Width shown for l-st floor is based on oLher exits. (0.2)
Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways. (0.3)
For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 3304. (f)
For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 3305. (b)
For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 3306. (b)
Page 4
FOOTNOTES:
4) Panic hardware is based on Sec. 3317. (d).
See exception for main exit in A-3 occupancies and churches.
HANDICAPPED ACCESS:
1.) Handicapped access is required to at least one primary entrance
to this building. -- Sec. 3l-03. (a) & (b) 3.
2) If a ramp is used for handicapped ascess, the max slope is
L:L2. -- Sec 3307. (c)
Handicapped access may not be required to levels other than t.he primary
entry Ievel. -- Sec. 3103(a) exc #2
STAIR NOTES:
The maximum rise of a step is 7 inches and the minimum run is 11 inches.
-- Sec. 3306. (c)
The minimum width of a stairway is 35 inches, 44 inches if the occupant load
is g.reater than 49. -- Sec. 3306. (b)
Also see exit table above to see if minimum width is greater than 44 inches.
Provide handrails on both sides of a stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing.
(May be on one side if less than 44 inches wide) -- Sec. 3306. (j)
Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. Minimum height
= 42 inches, maximurn opening size = 4 inches. -- Sec. L7L2.(a\
The minimum headroom is 6 ft..- 8 inches. -- Sec. 3306.(o)
Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected as required
for Lhr fire-resistive construction. -- Sec. 3306. (1)
Provide a landing within 1 inch (L/2 Lnch at doors used for handlcapped
access) of the threshold. -- Sec. 3304. (i)
The minimum width is same as door width and the minimum length is 44 inches.
-- Sec. 3304. (j)
The maximum travel distance in this buifdinq is 150 feet.
-- Sec. 3303. (d)
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS:L) The roofing on this building is reguired to be Class C -- Table 32-A
Cedar or redwood shake shingles and #1 shingles constructed in
accordance with Section 3204 (e) , Special-purpose Roofs may be used.
-- Exception #4 2) See section 3204. and fCBO research reports for requirements.
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS :If openings are not. provided in each 50 feet of exterior wall or there is
floor area more than 75 feet from an exterior opening, an automatic
sprinkler system is reguired. -- Sec. 3802. (b)
An automatic sprinkler system is required in enclosed usable areas above or befow stairs. -- Sec . 38A2. (c) 4 ff there are 100 or more sprinklers, the automatic sprinkler system shall be
supervised by an approved central, proprietary, or remote station service
or a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a constantly
att.ended location. -- Sec. 3803.
I
Page 5
STAI{DP IPE REQUIREMENTS :
There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 38-A
A hose is not reguired. -- Table 38-A
FOOTNOTES:L) The location is to be per Sec. 3805. (c), (d),and/or(e)
WALL AND CEILING FINISH:L) wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with
Sec. 4204. (a) and Table 42-8.
2l Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Cl-ass I flame
spread rating. -- Sec.42A4.bl
3) Textile wa1l coverings shall have Class r flame spread rating.
and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or rneet the
acceptance criteria of u.B.c. Standard No. 42-2 -- Sec. 4205.
INSULATION NOTES:1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a fLame-
spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450 unless
i-t is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. L714.(c) exc.*2
2) Foam plastic insulations are reguired to be protected. -- Sec. L71'3.
GLAZING REQUTREMENTS:
All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazinq material . -- Sec. 5406. (d)
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS :
For 82 occupancy rn alL areas customari.ly occupied by humans, provide natural or
artificial light and ventilation. -- Sec. 705. (a)c(b)
For A3 occupancy the Town Of Vail fire department approval is required prior to
occupancy of all A occupancy. Fire alarm desj-gn and fire
sprinkler design and installation shall be as per aproved
drawings.
Floor-Lst Occupancy-Public Meeting Room
The capacity of this area is reguired to be posted at 65 occupants.
-- Sec. 3302. (c)
HANDICAPPED REQUIREMENTS :
NOTE: Section numbers llsted below are from ANSr A1l-?.1 - 1986
WATER FOUNTAINS:1) one must have a spout within 36 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.L5.2 2) Spout must be at the front of the unit. -- Sec. 4.15.3 3) Controls must be at or near the front of the unit. -- Sec. 4.15.4 & 4.25.4 4) A cantilevered unit is required to provide a clear area under the unit of
2? inches high, 30 inches wide, and l-7 inches deep. -- Sec. 4.15.5 (1)
5) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches is required at the fountain. The clear
area is required to provide for a forward approach with a cantilevered unit and for a side approach otherwise. -- Sec. 4.15.5 & Fig.27 b,crd
Page 6
TOILET FACILITIES:.l-) A 5, diameter unobstructed turning space is required in the toilet room.
-- sec. 4.2.3 & Fig. 3 (a)
2) When water closet is not in a compartment, the clear area required is:
a) 48 inches wide by 55 inches deep with a side approach.
-- Sec . 4.1.6.2 & Eig. 28
b) 48 inches wide by 66 inches deep with a front approach.
-- Sec . 4.76.2 a Eig. 28
c) 50 inches wide by 56 inches deep wiLh both approaches.
-- Sec. 4.L6.2 c Fig. 28
d) Side bar is required to start within 1-2 inches of the back wall and
extend to 54 inches from the back waIl. -- Sec. 4.1,5.4 c Fig. 29
The rear bar is reguired to be 36 inches long. -- Eiq. 29
3) When water closet is in a compartment, the area required is:
a) 56 inches deep by 60 inches wide with a grab bar at the back and one
at the side. Door is at front or side.-- Fig. 30(a) or
b) 56 inches deep by 36 or 48 inches wide with grab bars on both sides
and door at front. -- Fig. 30(b)
d) If a floor mounted water closet is used, the depth dimension
shown above musL be increased 3 inches. -- Fig. 30(a) & (b)
e) Side bars are required to start within l-2 inches of the back wall and
extend to 54 inches from the back wa1I. -- Fig. ?.56a & 7.55b
The rear bar is reguired to start within 6 inches of the side wall
and be 36 inches long. -- Fig. 30 (a)
4) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor. -- Fig. 29(a)r(b) &Fig. 30 (c) r (d)
5) The top of the seat on the water closet is required to be 17 to 19 inches
above the floor. -- Fig.29(bl & Fig. 30(d)
6) Urinals are required to be stall type or have an elongated ri-m and be within 1? inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.1-8.2 & Fig.29(c)
7) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches is reguired in front of the urinal .
-- Sec. 4 .18 .3 8) Accessible lavatories sha11 provj-de a cfear area under the l-avaLory of
29 inches. -- Sec. 4.L9.2.L & Fig. 31
9) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches is required in front of the lavatory.
-- Sec. 4.L9.3 & Fig. 32
10) The bottom of mirror is required to be within 40 inches of the floor.
-- Sec . 4.L9.6 c rio. 31
Town of VaiI
25 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 4'19-2L38
Plan review based on
the 1991 Uniforn Buildlng Code
Project Number: 0511-92 Name: UEVCSD
Address: 846 FOREST RD. Date: .Iune 11, 1'992
Contractor: MARCAL CONST. Occupancy: B2'A3
Architect: ISOM & ASSOC. Type of Const: v-LHR
Engineer: ENGINEERING DESIGNWORKS Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
=1===::::l==l::yl:=:::3I=========::=:l::I=-3::-3:====::===1 Provide attic ventilation that complies wi-th section
320s. (c)
2 Provide panic hardware on the door(s) indicated, for
public meeting room and corridors, Sec. 33L?. (d)
3 The plans should indicate that a maxi.mum occupant
load of 66 is to be posted in this area. Sec.
3302. (c)
4 Provide details (construction and location) of
draftstops in the floor system. Sec. 25L6. (f)4.A
5 Provide details (construction and l-ocation) of draftstops in the attic. -- Sec. 25],6. (f)4.B
6 A 42 inch high quardrail wi-th a maximum opening of 4
inches is requied where step is greater than 30
inches to floor or grade below. -- Sec. 1,71,2.
'l lhe open side of all decks, porches, stairs, etc.
which are more than 30" above grade shall be protected with a guardrail . Openings can not exceed
6". Within R-l- occ. and all R-3, height min. is
36"-outside R-l occ. height min. ls 42". UBC 1711-
8 The design, construction, and installation of
elevators, dumbwaiters, escalators and th'eir
hoistways shall be as per the requirements of UBC
Ch.51. This includes fire resistance of enclosure &
openings and hoistway ventilation.
9 For heating or hot-water supply boiler applications a floor drain shall be supplied for suitable
disposing of accumufated fluids . uI"lC 2LL9
;
Page 2
.10 fn rooms without natural ventilation a mechanically
operated ventilation system shal1 be provided
capable of supplying at min. 5 cu.ft.per minute of
outside air per occupant in aII occupied portions of
the building. UBC 705 OR UBC 505
lL In buildings of unusually tight construction (all
new construction in Town of VAil) all conbustion air
shall be obtained from outside air. UMC Ch. 6
12 Furnaces not Iisted for alcove or closet
installation shall be instaLled in a room havingr a
vol-ume at least 12 times the total volume of the
furnace. Boilers requi.re a room at least 16 times
larger than the volume of the boiler. UMC 504(b)
L3 Provide a mechanical drawing showing basic design or
hydronic system or duct system, size of equipment
(BTU & actual volume size), sLze of mechanical room,
and size of combustion air to be supplied to
equipment.
L4 Primary columns and beams need to be fire protected
individually if supporting more than one floor or
supporting more than just the roof.
txltxtfxl xxrw --I
m Iq l-o l:B E I:o rt l.i5 e l9q 1 l;: g ItrP cr liq I l=E
=i5 o€Te 6E a9 -ti O ctt >t *g ii=I
m
=
<trq m: (-
ii=gP"
()o z o
-{F C o {6 z
!
lTl n 3
{
ftTttrl
--'id R x:o Et *2=d oo EZz (n =st
a
C,z
=q mt Ir
l=u lo .It lz<l<o r> 'n <E
-m F=,-f \o{so
@ m x m -It {
o z c o
@ L -{m
r{F z IA
O
CN
ctl (^)
N-)
o
z,O
=-{an
7
R=>A
Ti 6z
gP
\JT Z-
I=
A=
t zl -tx 3:
-.r o o>
Aa
nz >m OE -.{ >
n o
f
=m
i
€z m z
=lt
c)
r.{
c)
F
H
z
r'1 t-
m rrl
6A C)>'a-
t-
-l
(!r
-n
=z {m t-m
-.{
l{z
o 'n
t<l>
lF
m
z o
l
NJ s'tJ
I
!\o
t-t lo
l€
lz
lo l
F
m
F)z p
I
.,..1
I E
=
tJ
Y
19 !
I E
{o €z
l
F
m
tr{
z
U)
n
H
B
c)
\o 5
I 5 o\ut
l{o
l€
lz
lo
l-n t<l>
f l!tm
lo I lz lo
l*l
;
tr
z
€
F
E
F
!
n
tJ
\o
F,
N)
l-{lo
l€
lz
_n
t-
m
F)z 9
l.p
w
,-f)
Ei E
r-
z v)H
c)H
z
i
F
-l.J i@ 'I
(,
=
m o
X
\o
-Tl
=
I
H r.
r s.
-J o\
al /A
frtr,7a
P t-
@ s'o\
rll
(n
H
P
z
=m
a
EH3a
1i $i
=:-E
3
=iB,";s, O !a=
=-.og)
Sigs
H a3:EigB.
3a*=ro9*@
6sg€
-It qr 3
e,3-
=
il
;t a !.6
3s3.1
IeiE i=gP @ioL
Pordr
;;F
=Es ilq <o-l 0:a P 6'e;E i
gd*q
.,EP6
fr;; €
o
6'{
0r
lt
o t 5
3
=s
o
CL
!l f
o
o
i'
o o
U'
o
J o
i
€J
q)
!
o o z -{
{o
z
-l
I m
I
l_E t>l*
l-
I I
F f
I
f z l
z
t-
m
=f a z
m m
m
lz
lz I t t-
J
c -t
X
ITI
i
€
z
z
z a c t-
-l
z
!
--t I o
z
m
t
-r c m
ol lo I
lr ll il
T-r il I I
I
tr o I -l
2
z I I
m
t-
m (t)
€m
=z
c z
--l
o o
o
I o z c z
=
I
z m €
--{m
i
z
=z
t-?
>l
m !
--t
m
o
_n
P
tJ)P z
\,
N)
a
P
Fd
H
Fl
F x
F(trl EI
Irl
F
P t-
Fr
d >
ftl
OPe
= 6<5 Q*F to
-)'n =zo iiiQo o<z vOt4 f o 6 r o= E b zat o6 o 'frzz
=t x
I-
,o<
=
N
H H H
z
z
F]
F FI H
z
,-.1
H o l"
,F
\l
\o
+,
f.J
3
rlj
H z v)
E rr F
tJ
.Al 4l vzl r{l E"l *l UfI ol #. 1 trl 'ol H+l rul
EI FI rlrl tr{l Fl'l
Itsl lfttl >l c)l
Fl*l
r.l trl >t tdl g'l
HI >tl nl zll "'a
er Ei ?tS er
;:F 6i
=rE
ii ,, 13 Ql ;'E :;ltF I
9;o I t,ri
Iri
l*l u)l lol .ol
Et; ir
m r\o It.J I rl
I Ir lr !
z
v1 H F z
z
|.)
I^)
N)
-.1 o -{
t-
!m E
='Tl
m m (n
a m {
r rn
z c
rn !o I i
an 2 o z
m s ln €
m o
m
=z 'n m m
m c)
z
l-
t-c
=.
m l-m o
6
|-
z o
m
I
@
-
z
m
3 -
m n
=-n
m m at
VALUATION
!m v
=-t
z o
H
F t-
=m
z
t-c
=z
m |-m
I
t-
(D
_c t-
o
N .{
A
N)
L,)
o
@
o
:t
:t
E
TTI
d
H
,&
,F
!
tf
)C rrl
a
{
,F ,i
I
\
I
o o z (n
{8
o {o z
!m v
=-{
/1
FffiF i r"
=rs l: B E
Hei l3 E 3 Eil 19 I 3 FQ; l= i g
tF l'jj d I l=; :l-r r: J
LlL'llEl r j rxp 6 e o X;- : a-->= d €ci oo i g
F^=s g €"i: 3 g
*m.'bo tl
+
q]z
=q mt
lr ll lEo l-o
l']. <
l:'i o t> 'Tl |<!*$-F=
*=\C -{Eo (!
m x m !-{o z
q
@ a
-t m
z
i H'
v\
I
vn\
I
i
"l
fiF o>-r
=m
'Tl
t-z
z
3 lt
r)
Frt
'':'
a)
P IJ
H Fl H
E2 Fl=bl-IO l.-.1 b t.-H le,vt2 ll.Icola)I Ft.I o'l?)
I rrj ll,tc't.tFl ltrtl I c, I I r-t I tl
lEl tt
o
F
I '5 {
al.
'6*,
€z.m
2a
n2 >m
i>or a
m o I
z
o
z --l u
i
'r't r
@ z
z --l
J
r m o --l
o
t-
z -{
-.{
n
z,o
4 '1-an
c)EE
=b -<F r rr. lO tst9 gg
tlj l@
old
(,I}<
,Nl fpl\o .l
I Nl
c(l ocl
I
I
I
I
E \c t^slY
Pl<
el=ult *lF
l:.,lz
lo
I
I
I
ldH
t=F
lelE
li lE lFls
l= | "'":;
l:- lH
WE
V"
N
I
5
IrJ
{tr mlO Et€'lz
le t<t>
lF t,tm
le,
la
I
I
I
I
H lo
l€
lz to
ll t>
F-
lil
t!,
lz
le
I
I t*
J tr l{t+
t-
F.J 5
t\l
I
\|\o
c.
-z v,
N
rt <)
F]
C)
H |o
l€
lz
Fte
Pl<
sl=
Pl#-
16-'lz lo
I
I lF lr!| .\.
tJ.t*
I
*g$g;;- ogd ;3699
Eleit
5 eei d .:=;
E F
;*i*e
Hb ac -
+Fiss
'"4 gii
OO^,qt:
[*a*=36p-=a'o*oiot
I *9- o, P.
Ed-3;B
9 ;'a 9.3'
3= e 3"1
-v'5i=
Bqe+1 s,=33i
dB c.D I _{ cL - =.c
3 Fg3=
9ast B 3sdEi
F8 i 8:,
+8u a:
fl:3 3l s e u sP
='
trt
z
I
m
€z m
I
::.,_.
,*:!.
I
IH
I
I
I i
t.t
I
1)
x z o
f-
F f-
I
@
I z o
l o z
1t
m
=I U'z m
m
m
l< '
lz
12 t:
IF
:r
o c -t
I
I
t_
-t'{!
I
fio<>_n_o -{m
Fle 6l(,"l
I
z a c -
-t
z
-t
I 6
z
m
c m
I
IO tr€otr IF
-z za
z -
z>eR rci :D<!.1.: <
>o
f @o z c z
I
2 m €
m
=o z
=z
l-?
5,
tn
m
f)
fl
t-
=2
F
z
o\
\,|N O
(n
tq Fl
A
fa
DT x
Frl 6 x
FJ F
l-
F F
F(
{:
H
ONP zx2 s E*F bo n!'n
=zo i;qo o<2 u6).4 i: P e
z<h--l o6 o 'n2z
€
x
H H
l.{
z
hd
F
z H
t F F Fl
l-l
z
,,$
H
t+
5
F-)
o
Cr)}J
H
v>
F]
r.r
aN
d=9<
tsp
/.\@
2,=(r-o
f,/.z
3z
wrri
il](rt,
;i:l>
H "
l\t
FI CJ
l.l P'
I
Flzo
'att!
aJl FI
HI
':a
i-t I'z=l
eH :r
gE qi
3E !l 4ts |
o'o I -li
tl
t lgi
l'< |
I
o'- il I lro frl m,€l|- |
I
l,l
P
>l >
,!
F,J
|f,)
t.J
-{
-1
r
rn
='Tl
m m a,
m
--t
x
t-m
z c
m
q.{
m
z
m s m €
m o
ln
z 'n m ln
m o I
z 6
|.
@ z o
m
iT
-.t
o
|-
r
2
I
m
I
g
t-
=
m ,
=
=
!m 7
-_tl
m m
U)
VALUATION
a m v
=-l z o
(
(.
)
H
F.l
P rr
=m o
z
t-
l-
=2
m |-m
o
t-
|-
z.
s N {o\
,
h)
*
)F
F{rt
FJ
:r *
a
*+
a!;
{P
H
,F
'!
r1
o o
a o
?(
o o 1o !+
o .;;
o -
c c
c
=m o
z o
()
9p
3E
i6
o 6rn
=m =ct =-{:,F
-l()o>tr
o
2o
F=>m OE
oF !
F o
-t m
-t
o €2 m
frE rrP !
=fn
z o
I
(
t-
{
i
I
I
z o t z
o
F
!tt
P
z I
tn
=
{n -I'l
\\
\
\
N
IEF
ULN
m
Fl
.e r
?.z
,41
E F to
l<t>
lr m tr-l z
PI
A 'il
)r
i
|It
F
tv
9r
-s I L
P
H o It
lz o
ln t<l>|-t
't p
2 9 -
)
EE
F tr D H
N
lo$r E-
s
I F:
r:
I
!-
I
v
-+l
"dl s'l
\,_ |
EE >r gF
tl-fiN
PF
el\r
nF
8l
ar
-I rl
('
rn ls hE
E3 R:Ee.Io inO {l 2i x:.6€t-6F a7 FE 1e 81
!m
=
fi o
rn E
=-l
D%
rn cD I t-- |m= |
-\ l- |
=2 |
7
T-lr-'l L-J t-l
1i!
z=o@ >-2
6o z
z
-l m
I 'o
o !
TI
m t
-t o
@ m x fl '!
o z
o
@ (n {t||
0
m
ld(
F ts It
H c-:t t:i
-<
:;
c-o qc,N'
q
tl^l
N
!,tl u -
2 o
!tn u
=
rn m (n s
o o 7
v7 {E
o {
o z
!m F
={
z
{
ln
z
2
ri i;i E E 16 tEi e P j'i5i : e ' /11 tt - zi- :
..-a. I o ilr r7' I \/ '-f r t B {>/ 8 V:
/::'-''
Y7,
,//.,
-rrl t;ll I lllrl
ql>:ro oo
z
!fn t
=
2 ft m
l<'
oi x:-n Eo tt -'l e-'{:
et7!
=>c.=:o 6o-z2
e\
!
!
fi
J o
o q
o o 7 t o {
o
€o
6
o
o
o 0 e
It t tt t
o t
o t
o c
o c(
t
g
t o :
o
3 E
o I
o A
s.
o
CL
:=oo 3;:3 :'o€
Eiia
e le;
:; ii jeiE
Eiii
sFgi lasE
3 iE;
itci
iF*:ti ril
a*iF );'9 3'E EJES
s3E 3
F; ri ro=t :o-
[]i"
Kj'
t' J^
lrnH n,
NlN
z
:
a
73 loulh frontagr rold
vril, color.do E165?
(303) 479-2138 or 479--2\39 ofllcc ol communltt devcloPmctlt
BUILDING PERIiIT ISSUANCE TIME FMI'18
If this permit reguires a Town of Vajl Fire Department Approval ,
Engineer's (Pub'l ic llorks) review and approval , a Planning Departnent
revjew or Health Department review, and a review by the Building
Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as long
as three weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits will
have to follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. ResiCential
and small projects should take a'l esser amount of time. Horvever, if
residentia'l or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
departments with regard to necessary review, these projects may
also take the three week period
Every attempt will be made by this departrnent to exped'ite this
permit as soon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the pl an check procedure and tjme
frame.
ftztesnW;,)
DATE-Xffieet was turned into the
Communi ty Oevelopment Departnent.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUB.]ECI:
75 louth |ronlagc road
Yail, color!do 81657
(303) 479-21.38 or 479-2139
and acknowledged
oltlc. of communlly development
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH tHE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COI{I!ruNITy DEVELOPI'1EIIT
MARCH 15, 1988
CONSTRUCTTON PARKTI.IG & MATERTAL STORAGE
fn sunmary, Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or naterial, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and
workmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public place or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on aII Town of Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft. off pavement.This ordinance will be strictly enforcid by the Town of Vail ng!|ic Works Department. Persons found violating tiris ordinance will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove-said material .fn the event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the 24 hour tine specified, the puU:-ic Works Department will remove said rnaterial at the expense of person notified. the provisions of this ordinance snlft not be applicable to construction, naintenance or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the To$rn of Vail Bul,lding Department to obtain - copy. rirani< you for your cooperation on this rnatter.
f
(i.e. contractor, owner)
I SOl,l
o
& ASSOC.ZE 266 P. O1 85286 I
n /7X rsou & AssoctArEs
ll l/o\ Arctrilecture LandPlannins ProiedManasomtnt
,fune 17, 1992
Dan.gtarick Euilding Offl-c{al
TO}IN OF . VAII,
75 .8. Frontag€ Rd. W.vail. co 5L657
REr offiee . .'Addltlon. -SanltaElon Dlstrlct
Dear Danr
Upper Eagrle Valley Consolidated
fhia letEer is-to aqrend our appllcatiorN for
for..-the, ...ofFldc . edditlon at Upper .Eagle
Sanlbatlon D.iEtrl,ct" Per our conversetion
anendfients are aBt followst
a. bu:lld.ing psrnlb .Valley Consolidated of iluDe L7, 1992'
1.Errgineer{,nE -Desigaworks,.. the. . gtructural
the-the,.projeet, has been. .l-rrgt.:nrcted -to
architestural .plans that. you. have
DoB6e8sl.on-. They wlll be contacting your
the ne:rt few days.
eng l-ueer on
sUatrfi> the in your
offlce ln
The dllatsance . between
spacerB-on .the rail.lngs fire Eeairs.
Danic ' . hardware. shal-L be .pronLded".on ..the Bubltc ne€tlng roorn doorg or h+nilicap lever-acElon hardluare.
to be
Ga!,rle .cr.lder.
Marca1 Consbr$qtion, fnc.
2.
3,
. the. vertiqal. . or horlzontal
Bharl not exeeed 4n on all
4.
If .thelre
addlreseed,
ba
Sincargly yours,
--aw{r\Stephen'R. Ieom
s{rFiF.ll R.
sJld
B-1841 cct
P.0, Box 9 tash, colondo El60l ($3) 828-2688 FAX 32&0A66
....J '
Proiect Name:
Pro.iect Description:
Contact Person and
' iF{!'i'ilt'ltrllFPrr
Project Application
Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Descri
Comments:
on: Lot zl Block
Design Review Board
Dale
DISAPPROVAL
tr
a
Town Plan ner Staft Approval
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
o
MEMoRANpUM L W" {UJ, .,f_
planning and Environmental commission " ?, W
-, lrtg"^rn
community Development Departrnent ^"t ^
lrtJp*tlN*^\V- ir.,^; "t March9,l992 t -
W- W
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the expansion of the Upper
Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District adminisuative offices, at 846
Forest Roadllot 31, Vail Village 2nd Filing.
Applicanc Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District
Planner: Shelly Mello
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
!
The appticant is requesting an amend.ment to the existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for
the Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District (UEWY&SD), located at 846 Forest
Road, in order to expand its adminisuative offices. The proposal would add a total of 6338
sq. fr The following details the allocation of square footage by use:
Office: 2,423 sq. ft.
Common: 3,837 sq. ft. (Mechanical, etc.)
Meeting Room: 1,384 sq. ft.
Storage: 30 so. ft.
Total: 6,438 sq. ft.
The expansion will be used to accommodate increasing staff levels and to improve the
facilities service areas. This addition will be dedicated to office+ype uses and does not
include any sanitation operation facilities. The addition will be two stories located to the
south of the existing offices and on top of the existing treatment facilities. The building
materials will be similar to those of the existing building. With this request, the applicant
also proposes to install ten 6-8 foot evergreens as discussed below, and will also pusue a
minor subdivision of Lot 31 prior to the issuance of a Temporary Cenificate of Occupancy
for the expansion.
a
,.-+A w
II. ZONING CONSIDERATIO\S
The proposal is located $ithin the Public use Zone Discict (PIID). In this zone district' the
develqrment standards .* "ri.UfitfrJ
by the P-!p in order to allow for the flexibility
o"""*iry to accommodate public and quasi-public facilities'
Zone District:
Square Footage:
Existing:
Proposed:
Total:
Parking:
Required:
Existing Building:
ProPosed Addition:
, Total:
Existing:
EmPloYee Parking:
Customer Parking:
Tota] Avail:
Public Usc Disrict (PUD)
3,320 sq. ft.
6438 sq. fu
9,758 sq. ft.
l4
13.83
27.83 or 28 spaces
37 spaces
I
14 total spaces available
III.
UponreviewofSection13.60,theCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentrecommends
dt;t; of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the
Town.
The purpose section.of the Public Use District states:
"The public use district is intended to provide sites for public
and quasi-public uses which, because of their special
characteristics, cannot appropriately be regulated by the
development standards piesCtiUeA for olhg zoning districts' and
for which developm€ntitandards especially prescribed for each
particular development proposal or grojgct are necessary to
achieve the Purposes priscribed in Section 18'02'020 and to
provide for itre puttiC welfare. The public use district is
I
a Uppen Encle ValteY Coxsot-toareo
SerurrnrroH DtsrRtct
446 FOFEST ROAO. VAIL, COLORAOO 41657
(303) 476-74A0. FAX (303) 476-4089
May 15, 1992
\-i i/ f .:
Dan Stanek
Toern of VaiI
Buildlng Department
75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation Dlstrict
Adminlstration Offlces Expanslon - Bulldlng Permlt
Dear Dan:
Enclosed, please find an application for a Town of VaI1
building permit, as wel} as the requested two (2) sets of drawings
and specifications for the Upper EagIe valley Consolidated
Sanitation District's adninLstration office expansion. Per my
discussion with Ron Phillips and Kristan Ptitz' rre respectfully
submlt these to you for review and approval on the required Town of
Vail bui.lding permit.
If there is anyLhing the District can do to expedite this
process, please contact Gayle Grider, the District Project Manager.
Thank you.
WMG/GG: at
Enclosures
MaNAoER FoR TxE FoLLowrNo WarEF DlarRtcr8:
aBROWHEAO MEfRO WATEFt. gEAvEFt CR:EK METAO WATER. EERRY CBEEK METRO WATER
'^""f.^lJJi:J:'"'i;'^?:;I;l.=Jf :;'J;::$:::'t::J;::f "
Slncerely,
N
TOWN OF VAIL
42 ll;ert Meadou Driae
I/ail, Colorado 816J7
t0t-479-22t0
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
named
Fire alarrn
-/
'/.
Vnil Fire Department
I.TEMORANDUM
TOWN OF VATL BUTLDING DEPARTMENT
VATL FIRE DEPARTMENT Michael I'tccee, Fire Marshal Z-_-Jeff Atencio, Fire Inspector
._-_ 2<. 2 z_
t/.:-U f, Sd O):'/:'4'a- .4 :H' t7c'^-/
The Fire Departnent has reviewed the plans for the project above. The iterns narked below need t6 be:
subnitted revised furnished.
,/'
shop drawings need to be submitted.;
with a Colorado Registered. Engineerrs stamp.
wlth point to point wiring diagrarn.
wlth typical device wiring dlagrams.
with battery calculations.
with a list of specific device model nunbers.
with'equipment cut sheets for each type of device.
with the number of each type of device
with information indicating ttre specific zones.
with circuit diagrans.
with wiring type, size, and number of conductors.
with source of A.c. power circuits.
with energency lighting at the fire alarm
with infornation indicating monitoring nonitoring agency.
panel . .
nethod and
The ltens below need to
givlngapernltaflnal
Please check off in the
FINAL PLI'MBING
uxilnspecrroN's coMPLETED
be couplete before
Cof0.
box provlded.
DATE:
It rl il I'FINAL UECHANICAI
DATE:
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY RESID. NAME:
DATE:
FINAL ELECTRICAI,
FINAL BUILDING WEST SIDE:
DATE:
TEMPOMRY C OF O
p^r*lL-((-qL , '-9/
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
DATE:
LANDSCAPING DUE
DATE:
\S;b
o
./
Town of Vail
Dan Staneck
Uppen Encle VaueY CoHsot-toereo
Sarrrerron Dlsrntcr
846 FOFEST FOAD . VAIL. COLOFADO 81657
(303) 476-7480. FAX (3o3) 476-4089
,U \)'
,t['{i,'l \i'
To:
FAX:
From:
Date:
Ma AoER FoR THE FoLLowrxo WarER OrarRtcr6:
AFROWHEAO METFO WATEF . B:AVER CREEK METFO WATER. BEBFY CBEEK METFIO WATEFI
EAGLE.VAIL METFO WATEF. EOWAROS METRO WATEB ' LAKE CBEEK MEAOOWS WATER
UPPEB EAGLE FEG ONAL WATEa AUTHOFITY ' VAIL vaLLEY CONSOLIOATED WATER
47 9 -2L57
ll' V
Gayle crideyffi/t)Project vlan$ffr
January 6, 1993
Re: Office Remodel
This fax is to confirm our telephone conversation held today,
regarding your inquiry of our office renodel . Danr as you are
a$rare, I did admit to the District doing some modification to our
existing office. The reason for this modification is to remove the ,oldrr corridor erall that hras left intact when we built the new
office expansion, which had its ovrn (a new) corridor. In doing
this. the existing room will automatically become wider providing
for more space and finalize the connection from the "old" building
lnto the "ner,rr" building. we will not be doing any electrical or
plumbing modifications in conjunction to the above referenced
modification.
I sincerely hope this alleviates any concerns from the Town of
Vail and you. However, should you have any further questions,
please don't hesitate to contact me.
\GG
N
ENGINEERING DESIGNWORKS, INC.
127-11th Street #2 P.O. Bor 773761
Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477
July 13 | L992
(303) 8794890
Fax (303) 8794905
VaIIey Consolidated Sanitation District addition (EDw job# 9231-3,
may be
Mr. Dan Stanek
Town of Vail
25 S. Frontage Rd.Vail. CO 81657
Refrnce: Upper Eagle
1992 office
Dear Mr. Stanek:
s
This l-etter is to verify that the mechanical room layout and outside grlryequirements for the referenced project are to !".p"{ UBq€q,and are to be field verified by-th6 Town of VaiI during the construction process. Also please find
9191":"9 the requested cut-sheets for the. sp-ecified Glowcore GB90 boilers.
We hope this letter provides you the informat.ion you desired. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we of fur\her assistance ( 949-4823)
T
Qr
One burner heols your
home ond your woter
89% Annuol Fuel
Utilizotion Efficienry boiler
. Flomeless, high-efficienry
woler heoter
o No burning pilot light,
l.no cnlmney
OilE CORE HEAIT BOIH.
The UniCore qplem heots bofh oir
ond woler thr6ugh o single gos
burner in the boiler. which is
inlerconnecied with the woter
heoter (see illustrotion). Mosl
grstemswork i ndependenttY of
eoch olher, requiring two burners
- one for the furnoce, one for
the ruoter lonk - doing lwice the
work. The UniCore sYslem elimi-
notes lhese redundoncies to
provide you with lhe mosf cosl-
efficient home comtort qAlem on
lhe morkef.
89% EFllClEXl lo[:n.
GlowCore's hi gh-eff icienry, GB
Series hof wqfer boiler hos on
-A.EU.E. rotingof 89%. Thol
meons 89% of the gos thol goes
info lhe boiler is turned inlo
useful heot. ComPore thol to on
old 55% - 65% efficient boiler;
ond see how much You could be
sovino on fuel bills
It's Electricolly ignited, so
lhere's no continuouslY burning
pilol lo wosle gos. There's olso no
energy-wosling chimneY - iusl o
smoli diometer, CF/C/ F/C vent.
-rl
HOT SURFAC:
rGNlnoN@Nrnc[
CA3 VALVE
2O.YEAN WANNANTY
ON HEAI EXCHANOCN
cor{rBu$noN
ArR lr.owEn
||or tArm on toncED iln. oxrY
GIOU(ORE OIYES YOII A flOICE.
GlowCore is fhe onlY monufoc-
lurer to offer inlegroled heoling
$7slems wilh both hof woter ond i
i6i."J oi. r..hnologies. The
forced oir furnoce is olso highlY
efficieni wif h on *A.F.U.E. roling
oI glo/o.In oddition, lhe woler
heoter is ovoiloble in 30- lhrough
6Ggollon sizes lo suit Your needs.
*Annuql Fuel Utilizotion Eff iciency
n yi
POLYUNEIHANE I SULA ON
LONG.LIFI
PVC JACKET COPPER/NICKEL
HEAI EXCHANGIR
TASI NI(OYENY TAIEN I:ATEN
3AYE3 EUEil TORI.
In oddition lo efficienllY heoling
oir, Gloa€ore's GB Series boiler
heots rvoler fhrough on exlremelY
quick-recovery wqier heoier.
Fiecoverv is so fost, in focl, lhof o
.ornpo.i 30-gollon lonk - lwo-
thirds the size of o stondord tonk
- provides oll the hot woler o
lorge fomily needs. And with
f lomeless, high-eff icienry wofer
heoting, you'll be oble lo sove
even more on fuel bills.
OfowGore
UniCore'" lritegroted Heoting System
GB Series Gos Boiler
WT Series Woter Heoler
-
-
-
Hor Wiler UniGore System
rtmPEnAlunE
AND PXISSURE
GAUGE
3TAINIESS STEEL WAIEN DIVENTEN rANX VALVE
,)
rGloutGore \* Heoling & Cooling Products
GB Series
Ultra Hiqh Efficiencv
Gas Hot-Water Boilir
FEAIURES
r Boilers utilize on integrol combuslion oir blower for higher efficiency.
r All models ore equipped with o differentiol pressure switch for
proving combusf ion oir flow ond for sensing on oir inloke or venf
blockoge for o sofe shuidown until blockoge is cleored.
o All models feolure energy soving hol surfoce ignition designed with
oulomolic gos shut off if lhe f lome sensor does noi defect positive
com bustion.
o All models ore equipped with o redundont gos volve.
. All models ore equipped wilh o 40VA tronsformer wilh SPST reloy
ond plug-in reloy receplocle.
,/ \ . Ad justoble temperolure conlrol .'L- o Two-lone boked enomel f inish.
r Complete front occess.
EFFICIENCY
All series unils feolure high A.F.U.E. Rotings (Annuol Fuel Utilizotion
Eff icienry) when properly instol led.
VENTING
The boiler is venfed using 2" -3" CAIC/WCpipe ond fittings in
occordonce wilh the insiollotion instruclions ond locol codes.
CABINET
The cobinet is designed for f loor or woll mounting.
HEAT EXCHANGER
The heof exchonger hos stoinless sfeel f ins to ensure long life.
COMBUSTION AIRBI.OWER
Direcf drive PSC molors ore used with oll models. PSC molors hove low
slorting torque, high efficienry ond occelerofe 1o operoling speed
quietly ond smoolhly. For eose of service, lhe enlire blower ossembly
moy be removed.
BURNER ASSEIT'TBIY
The Unique Advonced Burner Design provides relioble performonce
ond low pollutont emissions. Burner ossembly is construcled of Inconel
Alloy ond stoinless steel to ensure long, relioble life.
'C
T
GBSeries Gas notv"t"r Boiler
BOITER SPECIFICATIONS
FIUE GAS VENT
)tvtoDEts GBO607 AN D GBO907
MODELS gBl30lo AND O816014
18-3/A'
I
I
I
T-l-t9"l_
l.-'--l
7/8" DrA. HOIE
EI.ECTRICAI
BOII.ER WATER
RETURN
2%'-r-
8"I
BOII.ER WAIER
OUTTET
44" (NOM)
-n/t6"
,^"'l*
f
Itllodel Nunber GBO607 GBO907 GBt30ro GBt60t4
Burnerr (No.l I I I I
Electrlcql D(tfo (volrt HzlPh.l 115/@/l l[5/@/l t15/@/1 l|5/60/1
(r.LA.l 3.2 omps 3.2 omps 3.5 omps 3.5 omps
Irqnsformer Slze (VA)40 40 40 40
A.F.U.E.%89.0 88.8 88.888.8
Flue Slze (lnches)2 2 2Vz -3 21/z -3
Gor Plpe Slze {NPI}1/z l/,/2 t/z t/z
Boller
Wqler
Inlet
Ourlet (NPI)
%3/q "ltL *lt/q
I I l t/t tn
welchr Nerfl'bs)
- Shlpplns (tbrJ
101 1A 167 167
ll0 il0 173 t73
"Reduce boiler relurn pipe for 7 /8" O.D, boiler tube.
Model
EOII.ER RATING ETUIHN.
Input
Orlllce
Slze *Oulpul ttionlfold
Press." W.C.
Woler
PumpMln.
FlowGPM
Presure Drop
Thru Boller
Ft./Woier
G80607 60,000 #30 53,4002.5 6.0 8.5
GBO907 90,000 #9 79,920 2.5 8.0 r5.0
GBr30rO t30,000 #11 115,400 2.5 10.0 14.0
GBt60t4 r@,000 #2 DMS142,r00 2.s 14.0 27.5
,o
'As determined by D.o.E. Steody Stote Efficiency Roting Tesl. Heoling copocity volid for elevolions uP to
2,00O feet obove seo le.rel. For elwolions obove 2,@0le€|, rol€d copocity should be reduced by 17" lor
eoch 1,0@ feet qbore seo lervel.
Model
CABINET SIZE IN.
t*llbx.Vent
length
Ft.
*Mgr.
tnlote
Alr
]€ngf h
Ff.wtdrh Depfh Helght
GB0607 l8 lt 36 2525
GBO907 l8 II 36 25 25
GBr30ro 21-t /8 ll 42-t/8 30 35
GBt6014 21-t/8 ll 42-t/8 30 35
i
j
,(1 \"'
*lenofhs ore {eet olus 6 elbows.
fFirsiten leet muit be CPVC ploslic pipe; odditionol venling con be PVC.
Noie: Specificolions Subiecl lo Chonge Wilhoul Noiice.
iLC'0 "juo 5 p92
ENGINEERING DESIGNWORKS, INC.
127-1lth Street #2 P.O. Box 773761
Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 JuIy I | 7992
(3O3) 879.4890
Fax (303) 879-4905
Mr. Dan Stanek
Town of Vail
25.S. Frontage Rd.vail, co 8L657
Refrnce: Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District
1992 office addition (EDw job# 9231.3)Subject: Plan Review Corrections
Dear Mr. Stanek:
Tiris letter is to acldi.ess Lhe rne+hanical- itens itenized in your 6-11-92 review (#051192) of the referenced plans.
Item #9 - See pg.Ml; floor drain is shown Item #1-0 - See pgs. M3 &M4, 5 cfrn/person outside air is provided during all occupied periods
Item #11 - See sheet M3 for location of listed 2tr PVC sidewaLl exhaust fLues and conbustion air intakes per Glowcore literature and UL listing.
Iten #12 - See Ml and architectural plans for nechanical
room dimensions and boiler placement. Glowcore boilers are approved for alcove install-ation and
room voLume is about 30xs (each) boiler volume.Iten #13 - See pgs. M1 through M4, we believe alf items are
covered except for mechanical roon dimensions
which are found in the architecturals.
We hope this letter provides you the information you
desir d. Please do not hesitate to contact us with anv
ons at 949-4823.est
t{,
c.Sharpe, PE
Isom
-c-
ENGINEERING DESIGNWORKS, INC.
127-l lth Strect *2
Stc.mboal SprinF,
P.O. Box 773761
Colo.ido 80477
(3O3) 879-{890 (303) 949-4823
Far (3Gl) 879-{905
Septernber 11. | 7992
Mr. Steve fsom
Isom and Associates
P.O-Box 9
241 Broadway
Eagle, CO 81631
Reference: Upper Eaqle
1992 off.ice
l)ca; S t-sve :
Valley Sanitcttion Distri c+_addition (EDI{ job# 92212)
Per your reguest, we perforrne'l a cursory investi-gation of the referenced structure yesterday to evaruate g6nerar conformance with the intent of our sLructurar d6sign. AL the time of our visit the sleel- superstructure was erected,the_bar joi"sts and.decking install-C, floor slabs poured,roofing and mechanicar roofiop un-its in place and about half of the steel stud warls sLood ancl i n the process of being sheathed
i.n general , construcLion appr:oach and technique appears to
!. pgr industry standards arnd in r-i'e witir oJr exiectations.Noted areas of minor concern are 1isted below-1) The double plywood sheathed, firsr level, south wall does not appear to be connected to the concrete befow per the specifications or generaf notes. current shear transfer through a wood tirnber may not be acceptable.
2 ) The upper f loor s.labs have water darnage f rorn dripping above and should be repair:ed.
3 ) Linderneath all nerv corur-nns shourd packed with a high strength grout- The no.theastrrrst corumn was noted to be without qrout at tbe ti-ne ni: ,-:trl- ,;isit.
'i ) Caril ;:iiould be r-al-eii r- ir.i r. ..r !. i. ile;r:i gr-l<rcr-.c sne ji- pallels be screwed to the steel stu.-! '..r.rl_l s per t--lre plans-
#5) No investigatiou of ti;e dr:cl< to joist: connections, menber slzes/ boLt torquer.;, cli.rreDsions or underlying structures were made .
Pleas not hesitate t-o ci;:: with any questions.
Sharpe, PE
VtSr*, fpgpfi:I7a* lJn 4r,^fpr-t-,1 Bf /<"r d
AtEo-_o.,"Aq /4sr,*a Or /)e.Ds o/- Eo-7- -tooou-*{
5 932
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DA|E Y'"/'?2- JoB
READY FOB INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
NAME
TUES WED THUR
lz
fo INSPECTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
-------@ PM
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
FRI
APPROVED
CORhECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED
CALLER
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATER
FOOTINGS / STEEL
I] FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
ON / STEEL
- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYwooD NA|LtNG D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB
C SHEETROCK NAIL tr
o
E tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
o
tr
tr
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
INSPECTOR
rf ol
INSPECTION REQUEST
D^TE g 3 ,o, *or.
PERMIT NUM
READY FOR
LOCATION:
OF ROJECT
\,tl INSPE \<(O
MON
p neenoveo O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
WN
CALLER
TUES PM
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
N UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION i STEEL
tr FRAMING
,- ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
N HEATING
D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
.\ \:
NAME
/ioi"CALLER
TUES WED
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT \ \.\.. , \'
OO-t i. \' i ',.,.--l JOB
THUR FRI AM READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:. _--i \..r.'-\Y'' i'
!t
I
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W,V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
N FOOTINGS / STEEL
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
_ ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
-
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
J- \-+.-;--_-
l\ \: | . . \\-- :- *r:\*-.: i -
\ _ ,/r , r'-.t. /.-.',. -, 7 -IJ,, - f :!t d FTNAL---'
-ELEGTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
T] ROUGH
tr CONDUIT
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL i H, TUB
tr
tr
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
tr
o FINAL
i ,l
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED FGppnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
INS CTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL PERMIT NU
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
EtI Jt &V JOB NAME
T E\,
'.L./
INSP roN:
(,
THUR FRI
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V,
E ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOI / H. TUB
D SHEETBOCK NAIL
| / lit C+'toy,.t,n iE^ .a-a;.'*1
ELE
trT
Ltr
tri
tr_
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH N EXHAUST HOODS
CgNDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
X APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED E BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
::<- z ?t -' ' *P@ INSPECTION REOUEST
oor.. ?ft J JoB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON TUES riEo.r' rHun
/t"' rl /
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
ON / STEEL tr
tr
tr
tr
o
ROUGH i
ROUGH /
D.W.V.
rr ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING N(
.T
=
\L:
r
Atl
WATER
GAS PIPING
O INSULATION POOL / H TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
EI FINAL
tr
n FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWEB
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
o
D
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
r.{. --tt -/ --/ <_
PERMIT N
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PROJECT ta L'^ a'
INSPECTION
c ,._, rowN oF
REQUEST
VAIL
Z- JoB NAME
CALLER
Mo^t (:G_-\1'"
ER
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
E ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER E
D
tr
tr
tr
o
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT N SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
Ileenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL (.\ \\ -irt.DATE "T - \ \ --\T JOB NAME
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:WED THUR
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
o
D
tr
tr
tr
tr
UMBING:
E FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
BOUGH / WATER F{tr-
RAMING
ROOF & SHEER GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
POOL / H, TUB
NAIL
D
tr FINAL
!
o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
D
EXHAUST HOODS
SUPPLY AIR
FINAL FINAL
E ROUGH
/rffi OVED D DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
n?Rs'o"
14 A /JJ JE
PERMIT NUMBEROF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
ril
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
(/
-
JoB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES AM G*THUR
/):
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr ROOF & SHEER tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING -PL
ry(*,POOL / H. TUB NSULATION
D SHEETROCK NAIL
o
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
. l;..
O ROUGH
-
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr
tr
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
D
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ffi^ouro O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
lNSPEcroR C l) "/l'' ''*u^"''
|n
INSPECTION NOF
NAME
CALLER
TUES,)S*"- t 1l ( ,,1
1:a,-)-REQUEST
VAIL PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
MON
1
WE q/
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
D FOUNDATION i STEEL
RAMING
OOF & SHEER D GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL .
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINA tr FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
oart 8-zz'7c- , rNSPEcroR
PERMIT N
DAIF
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
NAME
INSP CTION gu'
)1 (+
REQUEST
VAIL
FRI
/'r-'\(M PM Y)-/ --
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
PLUMBING:
/ STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
ON / STEEL ,EI ROUGH / D,W.V,
RoucH / wArER /Od il 5 t CIl"-,
- ROOF & SHEEF " PLYWOOD NAILING - {cns PIPING ';rt5f- cr\
tr INSULATION
-
D POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
-
E
tr
o FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER
tr ROUGH
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
o
tr
X
FINAL D FINAL
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED )b-*eenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
,-r.)-
-
lzc - z aof
READY FOR -LN$PECT-|ON:MgN ,@ WED THUR FRI
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
AM PM
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED B DISAPPROVED )(tt"outo
CORRECTIONS:
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT -lr \f\ !'N, | \''.'., ,.\ r \'.'. \' \ 'orre \- \D--\* JoB NAME \^ \'r -'.' \ . - , \'cS\.\ \'. )\
cALLER \rr.r.'J'lt''i 'l tt-*t-'
"\
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
_ ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
EETROCK NAIL
O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL D FINAL
nffisroe
DArE ?-{ 7-72 tNSpEcroR
t
MARCAL CONSTRU TION, INC.
310 W, Third Street
Rifle, CO 81650
(303) 6?5-9042 FAX (303) 62s-5s23
September L6, 1992
Isom & Assoc iates
P.O. Box 9 Eagle, Co 81531-
Attn: Steve Isom
Dear S teve I
During the course of the project you have provided approvals, and,/or clarifications of construction items include:
f) Construction of E]evator Shaft:A) Concrete stem wall at the base to be solid mass with no
'tconnection?r to existing parking structure as well as no trconnectionrr to CMU of elevator shaf t.B) Provide bond beam at first course above concrete base and two additional bond beams at floor level of office addition,2) Approval to delete C5 X 6.? between joists.3) Approval to construct interior stairway with 3 micro-1amrs I7/8" x 12n.4l verification of fire rateil doors at elevator location onry,no others are requi red .5) tevers are not required on lock sets.5) Shear wall - 1/2" plywood sheathing:A) Blocking at panel breaks to be wood.B) Plywood not needed to run continious over structural
beams - needed inside web for backing on1y.
Most of these were made in person or by telephone conversabion with yourself and/or Engineering Design Works. Confirmation i.n writing was requested on each item but was never received, therefore we are reguesting your acknowledgement below. This wi1l. be acceptable as written approval and/or confirmation of these items as noted.Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
us with changes,drawings. These
"",",7f zt f ?z--
S incerely,
MARCAL CONSTRUCT
/llaatlUs^,
Marc Wagner / |President (J
roN,
Building Dept
Gayle Grider
iaEes
INC
Design Works, Inc.
Date:
o
MARCAL CONSTRU TION, INC.
810 W, Thlrd 6treet
Rifle, CO 81850
(300) s25-e042 FAX (303) 625.5523
Septaruber 16, 1992
Ison & AssoclateB
P.O, Box 9
Eagle, Co 8163I
Abtn I gteve Isom
Dear $tevel
DurlnE the course of the proJecb you have provlded ue wlLh changes,
apptoval.s , and/or clarllleatlons oE consbructlon drawings, Tliese Itenrs lncLucle I
cotrstruetlon of Elevator Shaf L: 5ilAff f€.0 ftLxrfi(| s(+qt'(qo' tAy{Al wntlJ
A) Concrete gtent tlal-l at the base to bo sollcl masa wlth no trconnecL. lolltr bo erlstlng Darking structure as welI aB no trconnerctlontr to C!,lU of elevator ehaf t.E) Provlde bottd bearn at flrst coutga above concr€te baee ond two adclttlonal bond beams at floor leveL of ofdice
addLtlon.Approval to dolete C5 N 5.? betweerr Jolsts. o(
Approval to construct lnbertor sLalrway wtbli 3 ntcro-Iamrs L 1/gu x 1z'r.Veri(ication of flre rated doors st elevator locatlorr orrly,no others are requlred.
}{ Levets Brg not trequired on lock sets.(61) Shear walI * 1,/2rr plywood sheathing I \--l A) BLocklng at paneL bteaks to be wood, Ol 'B) Plywood not rteeded to run cqntlnious ovets strueLurar
beams - needed lnslde web f or backlns only. on-+J{#A\ffi:t:i^fn^u-
Most of these were made llr Fersott or by Lel.ephone gotrversattolr !rIbh yourself and,/or Englneerlng Dsslgn Works. conflrtnatlon ln wrltlng
HaE reguegted on each lbem but was never recelvedr thetefote wE are
tequeetlng you( acknowledgenent be1ow. rhls wl 1l be aceeptabl€ as
r+rltten approval and/ox confltrnatlon of bhese ltemg a€t noted.
Thanlc you for your coop€rdtlon in thte matter.
o
D 3)
4)
sl ncetel y,
MARqaAL CONqTRUCTI0N. INC.
lfiaul[d*tez-
Harc Wagner / |Preeldent U
cc l But ldlng Dept .
0ayle'Grlder
o^t",,{zt f?z-.
Li
t:
Deslgn workE, Ihc.
D,t].ce, .?/lA1/ t L
I
MARCAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
310 W. Third-Street
Rille, CO 81650
(303) 62s.9042 FAX (303) 625-5s23
September .25, l-992
Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District
846 Forest Road Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Gayle Grider
Re: Adminlstratlve Office Addition
Dear Gayle:
Pursuant to the Architect's request and the building department review, we have been asked to price 3 draft stops between the first
and second floor and one draft stop in the roof structure. After reviewing t.hj-s requirement with the local building inspector we
were advised that the Iower 3 draft stops would not be required but the draft stop at the roof structure is required.
The cost to extend framing to the underside of the deck and instalt drywall on one side of this separation waIl will cost S 566.Please issue a change order to incorporate this additional work into our contracL.
Sincerelw r
llb,zc { \/'(.r-..Hz-
Marc Wagne{ i
MARCAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
aEes Steve
ENGINEERING DESIGNWORKS, INC.
127-llth St eet *2 P.O. 8or 77376t
Sl.'rnbolt SpnnSr. Colo.'do 8Ot77
September tttL992
Mr. Steve Isom
Jsom and Associ-ates
P.O.Box 9
24L Broadway Eagle, CO 81631
(3O3) 879{890 (303) 949482:}frx (303) 8794905
Reference: Upper
L992
l)ear St-eve:
P1e
Valley Sanitat,ion Distri ct additj-on (EDw job# 9221.2)
not hesitate to c;;il with any questions.
Sharpe, PE
Eagle office
Per your request, we perforned a cursory investigation of the referenced structure yesterday to evaluate general conformance with the j.ntent of our sLructural design. At the tine of our visit the steel superstructure was erected,the_bar joists and.decking installeC, floor slabs poured,roofing and mechanical rooftop uni-ts in place and about half of the steel stud wall"s stood and in the process of being sheathed.
in general , construction appr:oach and technique appears to be per industry standards and in line with our exbectati_ons,Noted areas of minor concern are listed below-1") The double pllrwood sheathed, first level, south walL does not appear - to be connected to the concrete below per the specifications or general notes. Current shear tiansfer through a wood timber may not be acceptabLe.
2 ) The upper floor slabs have water danage from dripping above and should be repaired.3) Underneath all new coluinns should packed with a high strength grout. The northeastm.:Jst column was noted to be wit,hout qrout aL tbe tine t':t ,-,.rrr 'rj sit..i) Caro r-;houiri be' Lal:-eii. i-hat: ;_i j.-r. Cer.:j-gnatec sheai: panels be screwed to the steel stu,J ,rrulls per Lhe plans.5) No investigaiiorr of the deicli to joist connections, nember sizes, bolt torques, <liirrerrsions or underlying structures were made.
si
--
,-a*2.', nl
----t -/c7-
-)
-'
JOB NAME
REQUEST
VAIL OF MB
0
ITN PERM
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:WED,/UR
(,
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
o
n
tr
tr
!
UMBING:
UNDEBGROUND
D FOUNDATION / STEE-ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER O FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAtLtNG GAS PIPING
(rrusulnrroru POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL N FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
O ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
PROVED O DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
coRhEcroNs:
INSPECTOR
-
a
SPE
D PERMIT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
NAME
IN
1.,/ ,-.r' qi
THUR FRI
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
INS
CALLER
TUES AM PM
BUILDlNG:
D FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
,_ ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
!
D
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH o
tr
u
EXHAUST HOODS
tr
o
o
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
FINAL tr FINAL
,..'F'neenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
t'
DATE
''l
INSPECTOR
'*'"/ 2'/'
,,'' /' -/;,r'-REQUEST
VAIL PERMIT NUMBER, OF ROJECT
4"L..JOB NAME
TOWN OF t /), T-J
DATE
l.CALLER
TUES READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:j M.ON ED
i.- ., /(l
.../'rHUR fRr
/^\,'AM ) PM \,/
a
EUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATEB
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
D FRAMING
l-1 ROOF & SHEER
"_ PLYWOOD NArLrNg ^D {).'tn
D
tr
c
GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
E
o
tr
NAIL
FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
O HEATING
tr
b
tr
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
o
o FINAL
OVED tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
D^rE /f/- ?' y'L rNSPEcroR
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION:MON TUES EE THUR
Yt't-t ri
tr DISAPPROVED
INSPECTION
,,- .-. TOWN OF
..)L),
REQUEST
VAIL
READY FOR
LOCATION:
FRI
(leenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
E REINSPECTION REOUIRED
a
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
B INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
!
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
E
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
-
tr FINAL
INSPECTOR
,t3Z*REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER F PROJECT
DATE
TOWN OF VAIL t JOB NAME /. 5o,-'
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:AM
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS
D FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAtLtNG GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H, TUB
tr
tr
D
NAIL tr
tr
o FINAL FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
D
B
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
KAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
4-.i 4,i ,,4 ,.;'
nriGsrop
INSPECTOB
PEBMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
TUES WED THUR READY FOR
LOCATION:
TNSf ECTTON:
l/o" { i'}
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
O FOUNDATION / STEE_
O FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
.D
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
E HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT /;.i,. , tr. t trsuPPLY AIR
c
tr FINAL D FINAL
,E APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED
s(t:,
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
f.Pu# - ,,,
-T La i'-l'-=
(* {\'-
\rr
);'
INSPECTOR DATE
EN
Et[,liiffE tnc.
Deceurber 10, L992
MarcaI
310 w.
Rifle,
Attnl
Construction 3rd Street
co 81650
ifohn
Johni
The weyerhaeuser wood doors which were furnished-on the
uDper nasre varrei"ii"iliii"-t :"n "i!-u"ilt to arlow 20
mi-nute fire/smoru' rl[tr"l ttre-pari-ilru-"ot" construction
has beea .ppto"td ;[";t;'zo-nrin-ute lever of teeting'
I trust this rcill clear up any questions in this areE' If
;";;-;i";iE-ao not tresitale to carr'
SiocerelY,
i*ff"f,-lo@
z0s0 w. 7th Avenue ' Dqu.t, 'glotdo 8029o
(303) 573-6442 r FAX (303) s9$0420
I n tvya
'.j.:'l:rr..:,r '. .
W.34
MESA ELEVATORS
f ''7''" -j7,
T
JOB NAME
TEQUEST
IAIL -' z'-o/t/DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPEC @:
CALLER
TUES W FRI
/l
PERMIT NUMBEfi OF
BUILDING:
,.tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL O ROUGH / D.W.V.
O FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
n IOOF-&-SHEER D GAS prprNc " PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H.TU
tr SHEETROCK NAIL E :
otr
rwat 7-(!a n DFTNAL
ELECTRICAL: i ,' MECHANICAL:
tr TEI/P. POWER tr HEATING
I E ROUGH Q noucn
E'coNDUrr tr sUPPLY atd
-a', , 11
tr iFINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIQNS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr-REINSPECTION REOUI RED
,-€) u,aTP/trtL<, /&,L9 a3,t/t-
'/t/ lz*8r,
DATE
nffGs,e
/2 - ) ,t
_.-.
INSPECTOR
-,
l
NUMBER OF PBOJECT ttl
ol ']/ '- JoB runvE
CALLER
rgsPECrO\:MqN ES
ST
n
UE o
L
,!)
CTION RE
TOWN, 9F VAI
/<'i: 't' '
,N#
5,c),?,
r* d =,1 _) ).J-/=\
i
I ri Qt
THUR FRI
PERMIT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:0Yt)
WE
a.-,
a
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
D
o
tr
D
tr
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEE'
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER tr FRAMING
tr
D
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr
D
B
ROUGH tr
B
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIB
f rrNnl tr FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
\
:f
,t .'
ON NOF
r'
.-"-' ,:' ).. -,) / r./ c*REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
-JOBN
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
N UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
E ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,- ROOF & SHEEB
" PLYWooD NAtLtNG tr GAS PIPING
E POOL / H. TUB
41 /
rrl'at l-J=-:i--tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
f,neenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE /J *,//- fz INSPECTOR
Pn'!Fsro"
,
FILE COPY
75 south tronlage road
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 47$2138
(303) 47$2139
office of communily development
December 4, 1991
Mr. Fred Haslee
District Regulations Administrator
Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation Districts
846 Forest Road
Vail. CO 81657
Re: DFB Bevlew Procedures
Dear Fred:
Thank you for coming over to our office on Tuesday, November 5, 1991 . The policy listed
below is what I believe we worked out during our meeting. Please review it and let me know
if you think it needs to be moditied.
1. For any new construction proposal, the applicant must provide a completed
utility verifi cation form.
2. lf a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility
representative should note directly on the utility verification form that there is a
problem which needs to be resolved. lf the issue is relatively complicated, it
shoud be spelled out in detail in an attached letter to the Town of Vail.
However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company
and owner to resolve identified problems.
3. lf the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies,
and no comments are made directly on the form, the Town will presume that
there are no problems and that the development can proceed.
/
,
Mr. Fred Haslee
December 4, 1991
Page 2
The Town will add these policy statements to the utility veritication form. I have attached a
copy of that for your information with the added language. Please let me know if you have a
different underctanding of these points. I hope that with this new method of exchanging
information, future potential problems can be avoided.
Sincerely,
A r ./ ,/'th.oh /'J lr \
Andy Knudtsen
Town Planner
lab
I
I UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATTON
SUBDTV]S]ON
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The location and availability of utilities, whether they be main trunk l-ines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the fol-lowing utilities for the accompanying site plan.
Authorized Siqnature Date
U.S- West Communications
1-800-922-1987
468-6860 or 949-453Q
Public Service Company
949-5f81
Gary HaIl
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
949-5892
Ted Husky,/Michael Laverty
Heritage Cabl-evision T.V.
y1t y-55JU
Steve Hiatt
Upper Eagle Valley Water
& Sanitation Dist.rict *
a7 6-'7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE:This form is to verify service availability and location. This should be used in conjunction wiLh preparing a ut.ility pfan and scheduling installations.
For any new construction proposal, the applicant
must provide a completed utiliLy verification
form.
If a utility company has concerns wi.th the proposed consLruction, the utiliLy representative
should note directly on the utility verification
form that there is a probl-em which needs to be resolved. If the issue is relatlvely complicated,it shoufd be spelled out in detail in an attached lelter to the Town of VaiI. However, please keep in mind that it is Lhe responsibility of the utility company and owner to resolve identified
problems.
If the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utiJ-ity companies, and no
comments are made directly on the form, the Town will presume Lhat there are no problems and that the development can proceed.
These verifications do not relieve the contractor of hls responsibility to obtain a street cuL permit. from the Town of VaiI, Department of Public
Works and to obtain utility locations before diqqinq in any public right-of-way or easement in the Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not a street cut permit. A street cut permit must be
obLained separately.
* Please bring a sit.e plan. floor pl-an, and efevations when obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation signatures. Fire flow needs must be addressed.
3.
/ffiru
C.nr-xrxs,
RIqAATD L EATRINO
J]l!.E:! E. BAILE!, JR
Glt-gaRT f,. Lc:{Allrfi .'AJ!IE B €ICIIROEDER
WINDI J, IIA.IRING
BRUCE ',
DTACON
RICIiAJRD L AEEARER
x ,tft'tlg R. DALToT-
II'IIARD J. ALIIAZ:YER
J.A!'iEA ATRVE:I
R.A:.-D/|I.L lll. LIVTNGItTON
fED R, BRIOITT
BRI.AN D, IITZOER.A'LD
H. H^ROLD CAI.I(IN6
uelG!tal)
A PROFTS€IIONAI- CORPORATION
srlrFE 9a(X,
ONE (INITED BANI. CENTIR
17d) IJNCOI,N STREET
DENI/TR. COI,OR.ADO AO2OJ
O^'
TELEPHoNp (soa, sassaoo L J t
F.AX €O3) aSSAaga
September 19 , 1.9 9 1
Gerald W. Bender
Water Operations Director
845 Forest Road
Vail, Colorado 81557
Re: Vail Valley Consolidated Water District: Case No
82Crs328
Dear Mr. Bender:
As per wayne Schroeder's fax to you of this date,
please find enclosed a copy of the Findings of Factr Conclusions
of Law, Judgment and Decree in the matter of the application for
water rights of the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District.
Should you have any questions or need further assistance, please
feel free to contact our office. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CALKTNS, KRAMER, GRTMSHAW & HARRTNG,
rofalo
Assistant
/L^g Enclosure
7 47 0 .007
' i r'' t't '.'l
'. I i- .-.t-t.r-l l)1,'. :'. : \,'
,,lz-q) ' ''t' i ,-+ |! I,ANdDoN J. ,oRoTNaEN ":. | \
NOR.I4.AN t. !(RON l\, .
DAVID T. WEEI.'A
PA!IELA A. OIASON
EICE,ARD J. OOONAT
SC('IT D. 'TI)IBBEN
IIORI('NE II. !ii.A'RIINEAU
slll.tata Y. tq-EfT, trr
IADD & SEE.I^N
OF COUNI'EI-
BUA€'II P. !<NA!'ER
IIBO!:15 T. OBIIiAII/|W
EOBIRT L IqREY
xlcllalL & aErDY
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, STATE OF COLORADO
case No. 82CW328
DECREE IIIDEX
Paractrap!
FIIIDINGS OF FACT
1. Application
2. Notice and Jurisdiction
3. objectors and Appearants
4. Stipulations
5. Augrmented water Rights and Structures
6. Augmentation l{ater Rights A. Reservoir Storage water B. Stream Credit
Augrhentation Reguirements A. Water Demands B. Water Depletions
changes of Water Rights A. Alternate Points of Diversion B. Tenns and Conditions c. Consumptive Use Credit D. Ruder Ditch Rights
Plan for Augmentation A. MuniciPal Denands B. Irrigation Demands c. Snowmaking Denands and Return Flows
D. Use of Black Lakes to Maintain
Stream Flows
'1 .
8,
Paqe No.
1
I
I
I
2
3
4
4
5
10
10
11
13
13
13
L4 l4
15
15
16
t7
18
2L
22
23
23
9.
E. Additional Water Storage F. Depletion Assumptions and Calculations
G. out of Priority DePletions
10. Dominion and Control of Snownaking
Replacement Runoff Credit
CONCLUSIONS OF I"AW
11. Change of Water Rights Contemplated
by Law
L2. State Engineer
13. Dominion and Control a Question of Fact
JI'DGMENT A}ID DECREE
L4. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Incoqporated
15. Augmentation Plan Approved
16. Conditions of @eration of the Plan A. Reporting B. Monitoring
L7. Retained Jurisdiction
18. Priority Date of Exchanges and
Augmentation PJan
19. No Restriction on Alienability of Water
Rights
20. Limitation on Any Water Right Use
Inconsistent With Decree
2L. Filing of Decree
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
26
27
2e
2g
29
29
-2-
(
DISTRICT COUR?, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, STATE OF COLORADO
Case No. 82Cw328
FIITDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF I,AW, JI'DGMENT A}ID DECREE
IN THE ITTATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR VIATER RIGHTS OT TIIE VAIL
VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT,
IN EAGTE COI'UTY.
This natter having come before the Court upon the
application of the Vail valley Consolidated Water District
ltne "Applicantil or "District" ) for change of water rights includiig exchange and approval of a plan for augrmentation,
and the Court having considered the Pleadings, the files
herein, the stipulations submitted by the parties, and the
evidence introduced at the hearing in this case, does find
and conclude as follows:
FII.IDINGS OF FACT
1. AppJlcatien. An application for change of water rights
incluffig-ExEEange and approval of plan for augrnentation was
filed by-the Disirict on october 29,.1982. Atnendments to tbe
applicalioD were filed by the District and were permitted by
the court by orders dated January 12. 1983 and October 18,
1983.
2. Notice and Jurisdiction. All notices required by law
have ffi Court has jurisdiction over the
anended application and over all of the parties. None of the
water rights or sources thereof involved in the application
as amend-ed are located within a desigmated ground uater
basin.
3. Ob'iectors and Appearants. Statements of opposition to
the affi timely filed by Publlc Service
conpany of colorado, .the City of Aurora, the City of Colorado
springl, the state Engineer and Division Engineer, the City
a'na C6unty of Denver,- Edwards Water District, tlre United
states of- Anerica, Union Oil Company of California, the
Colorado water Conservation Board, the city of Rifle'
Arrowhead at Vai1, Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District, .Berry-
Creek Metropolitan District, Benchnark at Beaver Creek, and
Avon Metrop6litan District. Entries of appearance l'ere filed
by Eagle -County and Vail Associates, IDc. No other
(
-1'
\
statements of opposition or motions to intet:'t/ene were filed,
and the tine for filing staternents of opposition has expired.
4. Stipulations
A. Edwards water District and Citv of Rifle. On
Novenber 1 a StiPu-
lation for Withdrawal of Statements of opposition and Agree-
nent between the Applicant and the Edwards I'later District and
the City of Rifle. Paragraphs 8.D and 9.G fully inplement the terms and conditions of said Stjpufation.
B. City and County of Denver. On March 6, 1985 App1i-
cant filed lation for withdrawal of
Statenent of Opposition between the Applicant and the City
..and County of Denver. This Decree contains no terms and
conditions more favorable to Applicant than those contained in the proposed decree attached to the stipulation with
Denver.
C. United States of Anerica. On January 24, 1985,
Applicant ffi stipulation fbr withdrawal
oi statenent of opposition between Applicant and the United
states of America. Applicant recognizes the United States'
reserved water right in Black Lake, also known as Black Lake
No. 1, as described in Paragraph 9.D.(i)(a) of this Decree.
The United States recogmizes Applicant's water right in Black
Lake as described in section IIL15., APpendix A-
.""" t s2cw32e VaiI Valley Consolidated
water District
Water Division No. 5
D.Arrowhead at Vail, Avon tltetropolitan District : :.----- ....-i-...U. at!4|i/rYftgclrJ CaV ve!1t e-vlr'v4- v--v-a
Benchnarkats6lFcFeklEerrf TieeT-r,r-et-rT!;TitaE..-EiFFIE!______ ..-__=______DgIlullllalJt AL ItEClYgl r:I994, gsl{.J| \-I 'slE'\ r''s t'Ivl-'\''^ e'-ve.Effi-Gimm&orEan ffitiieil -6n-uary ffi
166'r iffitiTGa wiTfr-TEi-ouTffiipul ati on f or wi thdrawa I Lpp r iffitITIEa ffih--tIiE-To aEipulation for Withdrawal
o-i statement of opposition between Applicant and these parties. This deciee contains no terms and conditions more
havorable to tpplicant than those contained in the proposed
decree attached-to the stipulation with these parties-pa decree attache p
E. Eagle county. on January 24, 1986 Applicant filed
with this T6[ffiipulation between Applicant and Eagle
County. This Decree contains no terns and conditions more
favor-able to Applicant than those contained in the proposed
decree attached to the stipulation with Eagle County.
1e86,t;nnr ,t3tiii"i:il"t1'
epplicait and Public Service conpany. Pub1ic sewice .comP.any
cb-nsented to entrv of a decree -granting the apptication in
this case. Appli-cant and Public Service Co. agreed that
Applicant coutd recapture and.reuse snowmaking water accord-
i;-g to the provisio-ns of this decree provided that as
-2-
Case No. 82CW328 Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(
between Applicant and Public Service Co. only, neither the general issue of Applicant's legal right to recapture and
reuse the return flows from artificial snowmaking water nor the general issue of quantification of the amount and timing of snowmaking return flow nater shall be deerned to have been f,inally adjudicated. Neither Applicant nor Fublic Service
Company shall be deened to have waived any argument which
might othervise be available to them regarding the two issues set forth in this paragraph and it is the intention of the
these two parties to resolve both of these issues in a single
subsequent proceeding, if necessary, pursuant to the retained jurisdiction provisions in Paragraph 17 of this Decree.Applicant and Public Senrice Co. stipulate and agree that the
use of water to make artificial snow i.s a beneficial use of water. The issue of abandonment o! non-abandonment of a 158 .c.f.s. right decreed to the Shoshone Power Plant shal] remain
unadjudicated in this action.
G. The Cities of Aurora and Colorado Sprinqs. On
January 2S Stipula-tion between Applicant and the Cities of Aurora and Colorado
Springs ("Cities"). Under the terms of the Stipulation, the
Court shall decide whether Paragraph l7.B shall be elirninated or retained. Once the Court has resolved that issue, this
Decree irnplenents the terms of the Stipulation between Applicant and the Cities and contains no terms and conditions nore favorable to Applicant than those contained in the
proposed decree attached to said Stipulation as Exhibit A.
H. Union oil Conpany of calileE4iE. On January 28,
1985, App Stipulation ior'
Withdrawaf of Statenent of opposition between Applicant and
Union Oil company of California. This Decree contains no
terms and conditions more favorable to Applicant than tbose
contained in the proposed decree attached to the stipulation with Union oil Company of California.
tively referred to as the Augmented Water Rights. Appendix A is fully incorporated herein as a finding of fact.
A. The following structures were desigrnated as struc-tures to be augmented or as points of diversion in the
amended application: Bighorn Pipeline (Gore Valley Water
Authority Conrnittee Water Systern, Point C), Red Sandstone
Gallery, (Gore Valley Water Authority Conmittee Vfater System,
Point A), Vail Village West uell No. 2R, llain Gore llunicipal
Ditch and Pipeline and Flening Spring and Pipe1ine. In
negotiations with the Division Engineer and to f,acilitate his
5. Aufiiented WateJ Riqhts and Structuges. The District owns be augrmented
described in Appendix A, all of which are hereinafter collec-
-3-
$:ii il':3'833:",idated
Water District
tcater Division No. 5
I. State and Division Engineers- On January 27,
1985, app ivision - P3S-ine.ers executed- a proposed consent decree which was filed with the
Court on January 28, 1986. This Decree contains no terms
and conditions more favorable to Applicant than those
contained in the decree signed on behalf of the state and
Division Engineers.
J. Cotorado Water Conservation Bpald. On Jaruary 27,
1986, - Appl ervation executed
a prbpoi-ed consent decree which was filed with the Court on
.lairuaiy 28, 1986 . This Decree contains no terils and
lonailions'nore favorable to Applicant than those contained
in the decree sigrned on behalf of ttre State and DiviEion
Engineers.
-3A-
$3ii il'3?'3333"' i dared
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(
administration of this augmentation pl.an, these sttuctures or
points of diversion were -omitted because they are not.being--used at this time. Omission of these structures or points of
diversion shall not be construed as an intention not to use
the water rights or the points of diversion associated with
the structurLs. These *ater rigbts shalf be considered
Augrmented water Rights pursuant to this decree and Applicant shall be aflowed to include these structures as structures to
be augrmented at a later date by appropriate application to
this Court.
B. The Fleming Spring and Pipeline, E.c.D.C.. Gallery.,
Hoyt Pipeline, Bighoin Fipeline, Bighorn Fishpond Ditch, t{ain
Goie ltuhicipal Ditch and Fipeline, and Red Sandstone Gallery
water rights were decreed in Case No. 79cvll24 to alternate
points of diversion at the following structures: Booth Creek .-tiater Treatment Pfant Intake, Gore Creek Intake for Booth
Creek water Treatment Plant, Vail Valley Consolidated well
No. R1 , Vail Golf Course Ditch, Gore Creek water Treatnent
Plant Intake, Golden Peak Snownaking, Tourist Trap Spring,
Torm of Vail Spring Taps, Log Chute Pump station, Number 245
Pumphouse and Fond, and Plow Spring. The E.C.D.C.. Gallery.
Aoyt fipeline and Bighorn Flsh Pond Ditch water rights nay
coitinu6 to be diverted at their original points of diversion
and the above fisted points of diversion pursuant to the
decree entered herein. The Fleming Spring and Pipeline,
Bighorn Pipeline, ltlain Gore Municipal Ditch. and Pipeli3.e and -Re6 Sandst6ne callery water rights hay continue to be diverted
at the above listed alternate points of diversion but not at
the original points of diversion without subseguent decree of
this Court pursuant to Paragraph 5.A. above.
6. Augmentation Water Rights. To augment the Augmented water agraPh 5 above, the District
proposes -to utilize the augtmentation water sources descrj.bed
below:
A. Reserrroir Storage t{ater. Applicant proposes to
reiease wa@oirs to repiace out-of-
priority depletions as reguired in tlris decree. Tbe reser-
ioirs wtich-roill be used f-or this purpose are the following:
(i) Reservoirs Controlfed by applicant. - Applicant
holds conditional decrees or j.s in the Process of adjudi-
cating the same for the reservoirs described in sections III
and li of Appendix A. Those reservoirs and the water avail-
able under Lire priorities associated therewith or otlrerwise
storable thereiir pursuant to this decree or other decrees
which may be enteied by this court will be used to provide
(
-4-
I
$:ii L^ :i'8333",, u.."u
Water District
Water Division No. 5
augrmentation water when those reservoirs or some of them are
constructed by Applicant.
(ii) Black takes. To maintain instrean fl.ows on
Black Gore and Gore Creeks, Applicant shall construct ade-guate storage at Black Lake and Black Lake No. 2 (Appendix A,
Section III.15, 15 and 17) or another suitable site agreed to by Applicant and the Colorado lJater Conservation Board, to store 300 acre feet of historic consunptive use water.
snownaking runoff credit, or nater stored under the priori-
ties decreed to said structures to augment municipal deple-tions. water stored in these structures shall be used to
replace nunicipal depletions in accordance with this decree at times when a gage installed by Applicant as described in
Paragraph g.D.(iii) shows strearn flow on Gore Creek to be fess than 15 c.f.s. from May 1to Septenber 30 or 6 c.f.s.
from October 1 to April 30.
(iii) creen Mountain Reservoir. Applicant, under the f,inal operating policy for Green llountain Resenroir, 48
Fed. Reg. 58,657-8 (1983) ("Final Operating Policyrr), plans to obtain from the United States Bureau of Reclarnation,
Department of Interior (the rrBureaurr) the right to the
trelease of water from Green Mountain Reservoir either under the historic userrs pool or under contract or both. Green
Uountain Reserrroir is situate on the BIue River in Summit County. Green Mountain Reservoir has a priority of Augrust 1,
1935 in the anount of 154,545 AF. The decree was entered on
October 12, 1955 in Consolidated Cases No. 2782, 5015, and
5017, U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.
Applicant plans to exercise its right under the historic
users pool , as def,ined in tlre Final operating Policy, or to
acquire the contractual right fron the Bureau to have up to
800.7 AF released annuafly on Applicantrs demand to satisfy lega} calls beJow the confluence of the Eagle River and
Colorado River which would result in the curtailment of
Applicantrs diversions excePt for Applicantrs provision of
replacenent nater, or both. The utilization of Green
Mountain contract rights as contemplated herein wilf not be
decreed as a conponent of the augmentation plan approved
herein until such tine as the District files documentary proof with the Court of its acquisition of such rights-,
Eerves copies of such proof on all Objectors, invokes the
Courtrs cbntinuing jurisdiction pursuant to Paragraph 17
below, and secures an order of the court approving the use of
such rights.
B. Strean credit. Applicant proPoses to replace
out-of-pri6f,tylfl?E[TFEions occurring during the irrigation
season of litay 20 through october 25 by relying upon a stream
credit, which will have tlto conponents.
(
-5-
Case Vail
Water
tJater
,oO rr.'rze Valley Consolidated District Division No. 5
Ditch
(i) Consunplive Use gredit. The first component
of the strbaln ffihe historic consumptive
use water associated with Applicant's historic irrigation
rights, described in Section 1. of Appendix A. Tbe historic
coisumptive use val.ues of those rights htere previously
determlned in Cases No. w-2256, w'2564, or 79CW!24 or are
determined herein. The historic consumptive use vaLues
determined in Cases No. W-2256, W-2664, and 79CW124 were
establ.ished in those cases and are res judicata in this
action as this court ruled in its oEtlEr dated Augrust 16,
1984. The monthlv distribution of the availability of that
consunptive use aira tne consumptive use of the Ruder No' 1
Ditch,-both as determined herein, is as foflows:
TABLE A
llaximum Annual Availability of Historic Consumptive Use water (Units = Acre-feet)
Au,s Seot oct Tota]llry
ltaan and Ist Enl .
lJebb and lst EnI .
( :zalere and lst Enl .\rrank Larzalere and
lst Enl.
Scovi I le
Sanroill and lst EnI .
Sbively
Sandstone and lst Enl.
Park
Spraddle
Spraddle No. 2
Ka ts os
Katsos No, 2
Blach Gore
llain Gore
llcllooagle
Rose aad lst Enl .
Edward
llike
Bryaat Louer and
lst Enl.
Buffehr and Rose
and lst Enl .
XiahtiDes No. I
Xiahtipes No. 2
Xiahtipes No. 3
i 'ahtipes No. 6 \-,der No. I and lst Enl .
TotaIs:
\1-2256 3.1 u-2256 2.3
& 79CWi24 tt-2256 6.2
v-2256 l.4 v1-2256 r.7 u-2256 7.5 u-2256 2.2 v-2255 1.3 u-2256 0.5 w-2256 2.4 v-2256 0.8 tt-2255 r .5 u-2255 0.4
79CV1124 3.4
79CWt24 2.0
79CVt724 7.2
79Cr1724 0.4
79Cu1124 1.5 799vn24 1 .5
79C\n24
& w-2564 13.8
79911124 5.3
79CWt24 1.2
79C1t124 2.0
79CWt24 2.9
79CVn24 0.5
82cil328 2.4
De c ree Jun
1i.3
8.5
22.8
5.1
6.2
27.4
8.2
4.8
2.0
8.7
2.8
5.4
7.4
72.5
7.3
4.5
7.6
5.5
5.5
50.6
79 .4
4.4
7.3
10.6
1.8
8.7
254.3
-6-
Jul
9.9
7.4
20.0
4.4
5.4
24.0
7.2
4.2
1.7
2.5
4.7
1.2
r0.9
6.4
3.9
7.4
4.8
4.8
44.4
17.0
3.9
6.4
9.3
7.6
;
6.5 5.5 4.9 4.9
13.1 13.I
2.9 2-9
3.6 3.6 15.7 15.7 4.7 4.7
2.8 2.8
1.1 1.1
5.0 5.0 1.6 1.6
3.1 3.1 0.8 0.8
7.2 7.2 4.2 4.2
2.5 2.6 0.9 0.9 3.r 3.1 3.2 3.2
29.r 29.r
11.1 1l.l 2.5 2.5 4.2 4.2
6. 1 6.1
1.1 l.l
5. 0 5.0
146. r 146.1
2.7 40.0
2.0 30.0
5.8 81 .0
1.3 r8.0
1.5 22.0 6.7 97.0
2.0 29.0
1.1 17 .0
0.6 7.0 2.2 3r .0 0.7 10 .0
7.2 19.0
0.4 5.0
3.0 44.2
r .9 26.0
l .0 r5.8 0.5 5 .8
1.4 19.4 r.4 19.6
72.6 179.6
4.9 68.8
1.1 15.6 r.9 25.0 2.7 37.7 0.4 6.5 2.2 3r.0
53.3 902.0 69.1.
$:ii {3'3i'3333"''dated
Ytater District water Division No. 5
(
When tpplicant's municipal water rights described in Sec-tion tI of Appendix A are cal.led out-of-priority by a valid,legal call during the irrigation season, Applicant proposes to forego the storage or direct use of the historic consump-tive use water in the volunes and according to the schedule set forth above to the extent reguired to fully replace out-of-priority depletions .
(ii) Snowmakinq Replacement Runoff Credit. The
second component of Etrean credit wouLd resuft fron the runoff of historic consumptive use water used by exchange for
snowmaking purposes. For purposes of this augunentation plan,
the consumptive use factor attributable to water diversions for snowmaking is presumed to be 25 percent, indicating that
75 percent of such water diversions will run off during the
snowmel.t. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this issue until nore definitive research is completed as described in
Paragraph 17.C below. During this period Applicant agrees to
recapture only 75 percent of historic consumptive use nater
diverted for artificial snowmaking and agrees to measure the
anount and rate of recapture in the marurer described bel.ow.
A detailed procedure for measuring the historic
consunptive use nater used by exchange for snowmaking and
recapturing and reusing the return flows from such water is set forth below. This procedure will involve only the
recapture of historic consumptive use water used to replace out-of-priority snowmaking diversions.
Water for snowmaking will be diverted at the points
described in Subsections V.13 and V.25 of Appendix A. The
snow will be distributed over a rnaximum of 362 acres
beginning in Novenber and continuing until nid-February.(A11 parties but Denver stipulated to a snowmaking season
begirrning in october and continuing to the end of February. )
The water used for this purpose will be diverted at a maxinum rate of 2,000 ltpm (4.46 cfs). The naximum volume of water
diverted during any skiing season will be about 603 acre-feet.
The decree in Case No. 79cw124 provides that 25 percent of
the total nater diverted for snowmaking will be depleted.
Therefore, the maximum volune of water depleted during any skiing season will not exceed 151 A.F. and the total volume
of historic consunptive use water that can be recaptured and
reused will be 452 acre-feet per year. Spread ovet 362 acres,
this is 1.25 acre-feet per acre or 15 inches.
The procedure for neasurement and recapture of the
snowmaking replacement runoff credit involves a series of
weekly rnelsuriments of snowpack and precipitation and weekly
nater budget computations €o estimate the rates at which
$lii fl,3i'E333",,,dated
tdater District tfater Division No. 5
historic consumptive use lrater is running off the ski slopes.
The implementation of this procedure wiII require the neter-ing of alI water diverted for snowmaking purposes, establish-ing up to f,our snovr courses, and using two precipitation gages. The snow courses will be located in areas that
receive man-nade snow, and at sites selected to be repre-sentative of conditions in the entire snowmaking area. one precipitation gage uill be located near the bottonr of the
snovmaking area and one will be located near the top.
This procedure shall be ienplenented on or about April I of each year with netered neasurements and continued witb neasurements and conputations at weekly inter:rrals thereafter until the snow is rnelted conpletely fron the areas receiving nan-made snohr. If Denver agrees to the longer
snowmaking Eeason and Applicant decides to recapture, during the following spring. historic consumptive use water used for -artificial snowmaking during the rnonth of October, Applicant shall also use the procedure described below during tlre month of october. As to such october artificial snowmaking,
Applicant shall be entitled to recapture only that vol.une of historic consumptive use water on the areas receiving
nan-made snow that is calculated as of November 1 using the
procedure described below. This procedure need not be
implemented in October if Denver does not agree to the longer
snowmaking season or if Applicant decides not to recapture historic consunptive use lrater used during October to nake artificial snow. The procedure is described as follows:
1. During the snowmaking season. APplicant htill
areter all water diverted for sno*making purposes.
2. on April I and (October 1, if Applicant desires to recapture, during the following spring, historic consump-tion use water used for artificial snownaking during tle
nonth of october) or near thereto, Applicant will neasure and
record the snow depths and natet eguivalents at ttre snow
course locations and witl. cornpute the average water eguiva-lent as the average of the trater eguivalents at the four snow
course locations. These actions will initiate the procedure.
3. on April I and (october 8, if Applicant
desires to recapture, during the following spring, histo:ic
consurnptive use ltater used for artifical snomraking. during-
the montb of october) or near thereto and at weekly intervals
thereafter, Applicant will measure and record the snow dept_h_s
and water equ-ivalents at the snow course locations, and wjll
read and reiord the precipitation that occurred during the
previous week at the-precipitation stations. Applicant then
will nrake the following cornputations:
-8-
(
case rJ B2cw32B Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(a) Calculate the average water eguivalent for the area receiving man-rnade snow as the average of the
nater equivalents at the snow course focations.
(b) Calculate the average precipitation
during the preceding week as the average of the accumul.ation at the precipitation gages.
(c) Calculate the total L'ater available for
Enowmelt by adding the average total water eguivalent at the
beginning of the preceding week to the average precipitation
during the preceding week, and cafcul.ate the percentage of the total nater available for snowmelt attributable to historic consunptive use water.
(d) Calcul.ate the voLume of actual snowmelt
during the preceding week by subtracting the current dayrs
average rrater eguivalent from the total volume of water
available for snowmelt during the preceding week.
(e) !4ake an al.lowance of 2.5 inches Per annum
for snownelt infiltrating into the soil and filling the
soiLrs capacity to hold noisture.
(f) Calculate the voJume of runoff from
snowmelt by subtracting the volume of water infiltrated into
the soil fron the volume of actual. snowmelt.
(g) cafculate the volume of runoff from historic consumptive use ltater by nultiplying the total
vol.ume of runoff by the percentage of historic consurnptive
use water.
(h) Calculate the rate of runoff frorn his-
toric consumptive use rtater by dividing by the nunber of days
since the last conputation.
(i) calculate the vofume of historic con-
sumptive use water remaining on the areas receiving nan-made
snow.
4. The runoff of historic consunptive use water
will be available at the volume and rate computed in Para-
graph 3(g) and 3(h) above. This nater will be available for
itoiage' liapr the replacement of out-of-priority nrunicipal
depletions either directly or by exchange.
5. Applicant shall keep records for the runoff of
historic consunpl-ive use water in a form accegtable to the
1 Division Enginelr. As necessary, Applicant will make we_ekly-
\ reports to fne Division Engineef concerning the runoff of and
thl disposition of historii consumptive use water as provided
herein.
-9-
(
c""u O 82cw32g Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
7. Aucmrentation Requirements.
A. water Demands. Applicant provides water senrice j'n
core creek--fa1ffi-the tbwn of vail and areas adjacent thereto. There are and witl be three principal components in
Applicant's nater service: (a) "nunicipal water selarice"
which incl.udes all water delivered through the potable
treatment,/central distribution systen for domestic/comnercial
service to residences, lodges, reEtaurants, and commercial
enterprises, including irrigation of approxinately 223 acres of Jawns; (b) r'irrigation service" to irrigate approximately
94 acres at the VaiI golf course; and (c) "artificial snow-
making se:arice" to supply ltater for Vail Associates, fnc.'s
use at the Vail ski aiea.- Artificiaf snowmaking denands will
be a maxinum of 603 acre feet per year. An estimated nontbly
distribution of these denands is provided in Table B; how-
ever, actual distribution will depend upon hydrological and
.-climatic conditions existing in a particular year. The water
demands required for such service are estirnated to be as
follows at full developnent of Applicant's service area:
TABLE B
Projected water Demands Full Development (Units = Acre-feet)
Municipal System
!lonth In-Buildino
455.0
4L2.0
456 .0
308.9
273.O
441.3
456.O
456 .0
308. 9
273.7
308 .9
410 .4
4,561.1
Lawn Irrigation
0
0
0
0
37 .7
121.0
105 .1
70.1
67 .7
12.7
0
0
Golf
Course Irrigation
0
0
0
0
15.9
51 .0
44 .3
29.5
28.2
5.3
0
0
Snow-
mahinq
l.?8 .0
75. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t72.0
178 .0
534.0
487.O
456.0
308.9
326.6
513 .3
605.4
555.6
404.2
29J..7
480.9
588.4
Total
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
APr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
?otal 413.7
-10-
L?4.2 603.0 5,752.O
c""" rO B2cw32s VaiI VaIley Consolidated
water District water Division No. 5
B.tJater Depletions.
1.Ulrqi-c-ilel water Service. Applicantrs nunici-
pa1 water, excludi lIloIE course irrigation an-d. Bnotr--pal water, excluoLng al.J' goJl course rrrJ'gaEa9n anq l'Il(Jw-
iraking water, will be both distributed through Applicantrs
!--^a-J -
TABLE C
!!unicipal Depletion Percentages Full DeveloPnent (Units = Acre Feet)
municipal lrater treatment,/distribution system and treated as
effluent at the wastevrater treatment plants of the Upper
Eagle Valley consolidated Sanitation District at Avon and
vait. Watel for fawn irrigation also will. be distributed
through Applicant's central distribution Bystem to the
locations -of ultimate application. All of the 223 acres of
favns to be irrigated al-e or will be located in Gore Creek
Valley. Based upon the projected rratet dernands set forth
above- and upon the propoJed nature of Applicantrs Be:ivice,
the nonthly-depletions -associated with Applicant's. nunicipal
water serrr-ice,- excluding only golf course irrigation water
and snowrnaking water, will be as follows:
Ftonth Diversions Depletions
22.8
20.6
22.8
15 .5
40. L
105.8
96.4
7L.9
62.5
22.6
15.5
20. 5
518 .0
Depletion
P-ercentages
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
12.9
19 .0
17.2
t3.7
16.6
7.9
5.0
5.0
10.4
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.Jul.
Aug.
sept.oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Total
456.0
4t2.O
456.0
308 .9
310.7
562.3
561.1
526 .1
376.0
296.4
308 .9
410.4
4,974.8
2. Irriqation Service. The Vail golf course is
focated in portffi3, 4, 9 and 10., T. 5. S.,
R. 80 W. of-the 6th P.M. The irrigated area includes 94
lcri". Water is diverted fron Gore Creek through the Vail
Golf course Ditch and supplied to several ponds. l{ater for
iiiuaf iirigation is pumpeA frorn one of the ponds into a
;ili;a pipeii"e and dprinkler system. The gross annual (
-L1-
$:ii #'3i'[3i3"' idated
Water District l{ater Division No. 5
(
irrigation demand for the 94 acres of golf course will be
approximately 174.2 AF. At 70% efficiency, approximately
121.8 AF wil] be consumed by evapotranspiration on an average basis. The hrater used for irrigation is measured by a totalizing flow meter. Diversions from Gore Creek that are
not pumped into the irrigation system return to Gote Creek.
3. Artificial Snownakinq Service. lJater used for
snowrnaking at om Gore Creeh in
Section 7, T. 5 S., R. 80 w. of the 5th P.lt. at a point
Iocated as follows: conmencing at the NW corner of said
Section 7, thence South 1018' East a distance of 843 feet;
and diverted frorn the east bank of Mill Creek in the NEt sv'lk of Section 8, T. 5 S., R. 80 W. of the 6th P.tll. Up to 362
acres will receive snowmaking coverage of up to 603 acre-feet of pater eguivalent per year, and tlrose diversions will
constitute a 100% depletion to the stream at the times wben
diversions are made. A projected distribution of the monthly
depletions is provided in Table D below; however, actual
depletions attributable to snowmaking will depend on hydro-logical and climatic conditions existing in a particular year. Snowmaking depletions wifl not exceed 603 acre feet.
In sumnary, the total projected depletions under
Applicant's plan and the estinated monthly distribution
thereof wil.l be as f,ollows:
Month
TABLE D
Water Depletions Fufl Development (Units = Acre-feet)
llunicjpal Svstem Golf Lawn Course Snow-In-Building Irriqation Irriqation makinq
Jan.
Feb.llar.
Apr.
May
Jun.Jul.
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Total.
22.8
20.6
22.8
15. 5 t3.7
22.r
22.8
22.e
15.5 t3.7
15.5
20.5
22e.3
0
0
0
0
26.4
84.7
73.6
49.r
47 .O
8.9
0
0
289.7
0
0
0
0
11.1
35.7
31.0
20.5
L9.7
3.7
0
0
Totaf
200.8
95. 6
22.e
15.5
51.2
t42.5
L27.4
92.5
82.2
26.3
187.5
198. 5
178. 0
75 .0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
772.O
178.0
I 121 .8 503.0 1,242.8
*:i #'3i'I333"ridated
Water District tlater Division No. 5
(
A. Alternate Points of D!11ersio4. Applicant reguests the establ of -diversion for certain of its water rights, as foffows:
(i) Establish alternate points of diversion for portions of the Hoyt Pipeline, Subsection II.8, Appendix A,as fol.lows: 3.0 c.f.s. at the Blach Gore Infiltration
Ga1lery, Subsection V.1., Appendix A; and 4.5 c.f.s. at Vail
Associates core Creek Snowrnaking, Subsection v.25, Appendix A.
An alternate point of diversion for 2.5 c.f.s. out of 10.0 c.f.s. available under the Hoyt Pipeline water right was
decreed for Vail Valley Consolidated Water District Well
No. R2 in Case No. 82CW281.
(ii) Establish alternate points of diversion for
the 0.478 c.f .s. decreed to vail Village west t'lells No. 3, 4,
and 5 water rights, Subsections II.3, 4, and 5; Appendix A;for the 0.754 c.f.s. decreed to Vail water and Sanitation Distrj.ct WeLls No. 1 and 2 water rights, Subsections II. 24,
25, 25, and 2?, Appendix A; and for the 1.62 c.f.s. decreed to Vail Water and Sanitation District Spring and Pipeline A,
B, and C water rights, Subsections II. 28, 29, and 30,
Appendix A; all- at vail val1ey Consolidated vlells No. 3
through 6, Subsections v. 7, 8, 9, and 10 so that the 2.852 c.f.s. collectively decreed to those rights nay be diverted
through any combination of said alternate points of
diversion.
(iii) Estabtish al.ternate points of diversion for
all of the historic irrigation water rights described in
Subsection I. of Appendj.x A so that the historic consumptive
use associated with those water rights may be stored in any
or all of the storage structures described in Sections III
and IV, Appendix A.
B. Terms and Conditions. The Court finds that these
changes rn@e court and -implemented-by Applicant witnout injuriously affecting the ownels of or plisons entitled to use htater under vested water rights or 'clecreed conditional water rights, subject to the following
terms and conditions:
8. Changes of Water Rights. Applicant has proposed several chang@order to provide an integrated
water delivery system and provide augmentation water sup-plies. Those changes are described in paragraphs 8 and 9
hereof.
-13-
case ill82qrt32g Vail Valley Consolidated
ldater District t{ater Division No. 5
(
(i) A11 diversions at alternate points of diver-
sion shall be metered, as described in Paragraph 16.8. below.
(ii) Diversions at the original points of diversion
and any aiternate points of diversion shall not exceed the
Iesser-of: (1) the amount of lrater that would have been
physically available in priority at the original po-int or -ioints of- di.'ersion if tie watei rights were being d-iverted it ttre original point or points of diversion, ot (2) the
total divefsion iate of the priority or priorities under
which such diversions are being made.
(iii) Stream credit attributable to the historic
irrigati6n sater rights shall be limited as follows:
(a) Diversions shall be nade only during the
irrigation season of May 20 through october 25.
(b) Direct diversions in reliance on said
rights shall be- limited so that Applicant-'s Fonthly deple-
ti5ns, as calculated according to the Depletion Percentages,
i"i f6rit in Subparagraph ?.B -above and the formula described
in sulparagraph'g.r.ilfl beJow, do not exceed the volune of
historic c5nsirmptive-use available under th-e priority system
and determined by reference to the schedule set forth in
Table A, Paragraph 6.8.(i) above.
(c) Diversions of historic consurnPtive use to
storage shaLl be limited by the priority syfLem and the
schedlle set forth in Tab1e A, Paragraph 6.8.(i) above'
C. Consunptive Use Credit. Applicant has requested
the estabfffie use credit associated r*ith
its historic irrisation watei rights described in Section I
of Appendix A so that said water may be used for augrmen-
tati6i, etchange, direct use, reuse, and. su-ccessive use to
iitin"tion and-disposition for alf municipa_l purposes. lhe
rnaximum annual hidtoric consunptive use values of aII of
ipplicant's historic irrigation nater r-ights. v-hich are
i'niofvea in the Applicatio-n are accurately set forth under
the trTotalu colunn of the Echedufe in ?abfe A, Para-
aiapn 6.8.(i) above, and the Court finds that the nonthly
SistiiUutidn'of those total values also are accurately set
forth in said schedule.
D. The Ruder Ditch RfShls. The 0.59 c.f.s' ltater
right anarm Ditch described in subsec-
li5n r.r5., Appendix A and the 0.59 c.f.s' water -righ!.ir.iaeA to'thi-nuder No. 1 Ditch First Enlargenent described
ir sulir"tion l.ie, lppendix A are hereby changed in tlpe and
\
-14-
(
case tl B2cw32B Varl Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
manner of use and alternate points of diversion are estab-lished as described above. These water rights were used historically to irrigate 22 acres of hay meadows. This Court finds the total consumptive use credit available to Applicant
from the Ruder No. 1 Dltch and the Ruder No. I Ditch Enlarge-
ment to be 31.0 acre feet. ?his historic consumptive use credit shall be available to the Applicant in accordance with the schedule in Table A, Paragraph 6.8.(i) and the terms and conditions irnposed in Paragaph 8.8 above.
Applicant cfaims no credit for and abandons to the
stream the 4.2 AF of historic consunptive use water attrib-utable to the 0.76 c.f.s. lrater right involved in this application out of the 1.26 c.f.s. f,rater right originally
decreed to the Ruder No. 2 Ditch, out of Gore Creek, Priority
No. 389 in old water Division No. 37, with adjudication date of October 3, 1936 and appropriation date of June 1, 1900,-Civil Action No. 963, 1981 Basin Rank 2757. Headgate loca-tion: at a point on the right bank of core Creek wbence the
l{l,l corner of the }Ihk }11{% of Section 14, Township 5 Sout}r,
Range 81 t{est, 6th P.M. bears North 25"5A ' West, 4,462.72 feet. 0.5 c.f.s. of this 1.26 c.f.s. water right was changed to donestic use by decree entered in Case No, N-272 on
October 6, 1971. Pursuant to decrees entered in Case
Nos. W-1970, and 79CW22O (see Appendix Section V, Para-graphs 18 and 19) this water right is diverted and shall continue to be used in Applicantrs water system through Vail
fntermountain tlells No. 2 and No. 4.
9. PJan for Aucrmentation.
A. Municipal Demands. Applicant shall supply its
nrunicipal @s to the extent that water is physically available and in priority by use of its nunicipal
year-round direct flow water rights described in Section II of Appendix A and as protected by the historic users pool of
Green Mountain Reservoir. If the municipal water rights are called out of priority during the irrigation aeason APplicant shall continue to divert lrater but will augrment its deple-tions directly by using consunptive uae credits fron its historic irrigation direct flow water rights described in
Section I of Appendix A. Consumptive uae credits from irrigation water rights are limited in the aggregate to the daily rates of flow and the naximum monthly volumes set forth in Table E. water available under the historic irrigation rights which is not needed for direct augrmentation of nunici-pal diversions or for golf course irrigation as described in
iubparagraph 9.B. below, will be Etored in augimentation
resLrvoirs to be constructed by the Applicant. Storage of
any such irrigation consumptive use credits shall be linited
(
t
-15-
(
ca"" rf s2cw32s vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
to daily rates of flow and maxinurn nronthly volumes no greater
than those set forth in Table E, fess the amount coneurrently
used for direct augimentation of municipal diversions and golf
course irrigation. During the nonirrigation Eeason nhen the
municipal water rights are out of priority, rater shall be
released from Applicant's augrmentation resenroirs in the
anount necessary-to offset and bafance ApPlicant's out-of-pri-ority depletion-. Applicant may also use water obtained from
Green llountain Reservoir pursuant to the Final Operating
Policy under a nater service contract with the Bureau of
Recl.amation to augrment out-of-priority nunicipal depletions.
B. Irrigation Dernands. tlater for irrigation use will
be supplie@ts owned by Applicant as des-
cribed in Section ff, Appendix A at tines when those rights
are in priority, or are protected by the historic users pool
of Green l{ountlin Reservoir and have water physically avail-
-able to them at their points of diversion. To the extent
Applicant requires additional water- for irrigating the golf
course, this nater will be supplied by the historic irriga-tion direct flow water rights described in Section I of
Appendix A. The rnaximun annual historic consumptive use cilaits attributable to these water rights total-902.0 acre feet and when in priority will be avaitable in the following quantities and flow rates:
Month
TABLE E
Maximum
Monthly
Quantity (Acre Feet)
69.4
254.3
222.8
146 .1
146. I
53.3
962-.0'
Maximum*Daily
Flow Rate (c.f .s. )
2.92
4.27
3.62
2.38
2.46 t.28
May
Jun.Jul.
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
TOTAT
* Applicant's stipulation with Denver describes these
rbtes as maxirnum rates at which historic consunptive use
water may be used; conseguently, this column is labeled ItMaximum-Daity Flow Rate." All other objectors agreed
there would bE no injury if these flow rates were daily
averages and stipulated to decrees which labeled this
colunn I'Average Daily Flow Rate.rr
-16-
.""" nl, zcwsz.Vail Valley Consolidated
Vlater District t{ater Division No. 5 (
(
Projected annual depletions attributable to golf
course irrigation total 121.8 acre feet.
Any consunptive use water from the historic irriga-tion water rights which is not reguired for the direct
replacement of- out-of-priority municipal depletions or which
is- not needed for irrigation purposes will be available for
storage either directly or by exchange in aay reservoir facilities described in Appendix A which may be available to Vail. Consumptive use water which is available as provided in Tables a and E above and subparagraph 7.B above but which is not used when it is so availabfe to replace out-of-prior-ity depletions directly or not etored when it is so available in Applicant's reservoirs will not otherwise be used by.
appliCant without a subseguent decree of this Court approving
such other use.
c. Snowmakinq Demands and Return Elo1ls. Applicant
provides w use-in _nqklng -artificial snow for the Vail ski area. A maximun of 603 AF of water will be required for the puryose of naking artifi-cia] snow. Water diverted for this Purpose shall be con-
sidered 1Oo percent consumed at the time of diversion.out-of-priority depletions attributable to artificial snow-
naking -shal} be augmented: (1) by releases of historic
consumptive use water stored during the irrigation Eeason
under the historic irrigation water rights ' (2, by water
stored in the storage ieservoirs listed in Appendix A,
Section III or Iv under their storage priorities' or (3) by
nater released fron Green ltountain Reservoir under a water
service contract pursuant to the Final operating Policy.
However, Applicant rnay not take credit for snoumelt return
flow eithei-ly direct- flow or exchange from Green Uountain
Reservoir releases used for snowmaking.
Applicant nay recaptute 75% of the historic con-
sumptive uiri water us-ed for snowmaking as described in
sublaragraph 6.8.(ii). Applicant nay reuse to extinction the
historii Consumptive use water obtained through the recap-ture, by exchange and storage, of snowmaflng replacernent runoff credit. -Applicant may use Enownaking replacement
runoff credit for direct use, storage for subseguent use, or
direct auginentation of out-of-priority depletions for all
beneficiaf uses. Snownaking replacement runoff credit
available under Subparagraph-6.B.(ii) not used when it is so
available to replacl out of priority depletions directly or
not stored when it is so avaifabte in Applicantrs reservoirs
nay not thereafter be claimed by eppliclnt in the absence of
a subsequent decree of this Court.
L
-L7-
case tO B2cw32B Vail Varley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
D. Use of Black Lakes to lilaintain Stream Flows. Appli-cant shall tatfon purposes in B1ack Lake and Black Lake No . 2, ot other suit-able in-basin sources, to maintain strean flows on Gore Creek. Water stored in these structures shall be part of the Applicant's augrmentation plan and will be used to replace out-of-priority nunicipal depletions as described in Para-graph 9.O.(ii) below.
(i) Storaoe Capacity. Applicant proposes to provide 300 acre feet- of- stoiagre ln the Black Lakes for
augmentation purposes in the following nanner.
(a) Black Lake. Applicant proposes to construct 22'l acre feet of additional storage capacity at
Black Lake. Objector United States of America has a reserved water right of 44.4 acre feet with reserrration date of
YIay L2, 1905 for the purpose of securing favorabfe conditions of water flows and furnishing a continuous supply of timber for the use and necessity of the citizens of the United States as decreed in Case No. w-467. Applicant shall not
reduce the water level in Black Lake below 10,480.3 feet elevation except to the extent evaporation would cause the
water level to be less than that elevation. The 227 acre
f,eet of storage provided by Applicant shall. be in addition to
tJ:'e 44.4 acre feet owned by the United States and shall be
stored at or above 10,480.3 feet in elevation. The elevation
was determined from a Colorado Departrnent of Highways nap; it will be verified by survey within 24 months.
(b) Black Lake No. 2. The Division of Wildlife has a water right of 113.5 acre feet with an appro-priation date of June 11, 1955 in Black Lake No. 2. Appli-cant has a water right of 113.6 acre feet with an appropria-tion date of December 20, 1978 in Black take No. 2. Up to
73 acre feet of water fron Black Lake No. 2 wifl be provided
for augmentation purposes as described below. Applicant shall maintain a nininum ]ake leve1 of approximately 40 acre
feet in Black Lake No. 2 by not reducing the water fevel
below an elevation of 10,359.65 feet except to tlre extent
evaporation would cause the water level to fall below that elevation. The elevation was determined frorn a Coforado
Departnent of llighways nap and the nap and filing statement
filed in the office of the state Engineer; it will be veri-
fied by survey within 24 months
(ii) operation. Black Lakes Ehall be operated
to augment municipal-@Eions when streamflows at the
streani gage described ii Paragraph 9.D.(iii) below (t'Vail
Gagerr) irC at or below 15 c.f.s. fron llay 1to September 30
o
(
-18-
(
c"=. lOs2cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
water Division No. 5
(summer) and 6 c.f.s. from October 1to April 30 (winter).
Use of the Black Lakes for augmentation purposes shall be subject to the following linitations: (1) total storage
capacity available for augrnentation from this source shall be
300 acre feet so long as Applicant's aggregate water demand
does not exceed 4,876.4 acre feet per year;_(2)-Applicant.
must use water from Black Lakes to replace only thoEe municr-pal diversions in excess of 4.35 c.f.s. and the diversions listed in Table B under |tGolf Course Irrigationt' which
together equal the leve1 of water use by APPlicant prior to
December L977i and (3) replacements fron Black Lakes rnust be
made only to the extent necessary to bring the strean fl.ow in
Gore CreEk, as tneasured at the Vail Gage, to 15 c.f.s. in the
sunmer or 5 c.f.s. in the winter or the natural strean flow,
whichever is less. Under the terms of this decree, Applicant
nay divert water downstream of the Vail Gage; however,Applicant shaIl not divert from structures or under water rights other than those decreed herein without subsequent
decree of this court.
(a) Applicant has agreed not to oppose
applications by the Colorado Water Conservation Board to
ehlarge the summer flow period to include the month of
October. The stream segrnents on which these enlargements will occur are described as follows:
Streaur Upper Point Lower Point
facrease frort
lJinter to Sunnrer
(
1.
2.
3.
4.
Black Gore Cr.
Gore Creek
Gore Creek
Gore Creek
Black Lake No. 2 Confl .
Headwaters Confl.
Conft Bt. Gore Confl.
Confl. Red Sandstone Confl .
Gore Cr. 3 c.f.s. 7 c.f.s.
BI . Gore Cr. 5 c.f.s. 10 c.f.s'
Red Sandstone 6 c.f.s. f6 c.f.s.
Eagle River 8 c.f.s. 22 c.f.s.
These enlargernents wiLl increase the instream flow
to be naintained during the nonth of October on Gore Creek at
the Vail Gage from 5 c.f.s. to 15 c.f.9. The augmentation plan, exchariges, and changes of water rights embodied in this -decree are s-enior to aII these enlargements in the month of
october. Applicant, however, agrees to augment sunmer flows
during octobLr according to the tgnns -of Paragraph.9.D.
Appli6antrs agreenent to-augment this enlargemen! to instream
fi-ows shall riot increase Applicantrs augrmentation Etorage
requirenent of 300 acre feet.
(b) Applicant shalL blpass through Black Lake
No. 2 the lesser of-i c.f.s. or an amount egual to all
tributary inflow accruing to.Black Lake No.'2 below Black
Lake during the filling-period (April-Au.gust)- for both
ieservoirs." This blpasi sira1l not 5e considered a rel.ease of
'I
-19-
c"". rla 2cw328 VaiI Valley Consolidated
Water District
Vfater Division No. 5
(
t
(
augmentation water pursuant to thj,s decree; howeve!, any
nater so blpassed may be diverted by Applicant at ?ny.point downstream-ot etact Lake No. 2 when diverted in priority or
when augunented pursuant to this decree or other valid decrees.
(c) The 300 acre feet of storage capacity will be filled once each year under Applicantrs water rights
described in Sections III.15 and 1.7' Appendix A for Black
Lake, and the Division of wildlife water right for 113.5 acre
feet with an appropriation date of June 11, 1955 or Appli-
cant's water right described in Section III.16, Appendix A
for Black Lake No. 2. water collected under this one time filling, less dny evaporation losses which may be charged by
the Division Engineer, will be available for augrmentation as
described in this Paragraph 9.D. Alternatively, Applicant
may choose to store historic consumptive use water in Black
Lakes as described in Paragraph 8.A.(iii) under the terns
described in this Paragraph 9.D. To provide adeguate ltater
rights at Black Lake, Applicant shall transfer 171 acre feet
of- its Black take No. -2, First Enlargement water right
described in Section III.17, Appendix A to Black Lake by
appropriate decree of this Court. Applicant.shall have
augrmehtation storage available prior to invading instream
flows by more than the level of water use in December L977 as
defined in Paragraph 9.D.(ii).
(iii) Vail Stream Gaqe. Applicant sha1l
install a stream 'gagErcrETffi the state and Division
Engineers and opeiational year round in the vicinity of the
Vail wastewater treatment plant upstream of the point of
discharge for that plant.
(iv) If total water denands exceed 4,876.4
acre feet per-year, then Applicant shall either provide--
additional in-bisin storage to augrment strean flows or shall
curtail diversions so they do not exceed 4,876.4 acre feet
Per year.
(a) Snowmaking. If stream flows at the
Vail Gage drop below 15 c.f.s. from october 1 to October 31
or o c.'f.s. from Novenber 1 to April 30, Applicant shall
lirnit diversions for snowmaking through the structure
described in Section v.25, Appendix A to the amount 'of effluent being discharged from the Vail wastewater treatment
p1ant. As loig as thii limitation is observed and Appl.icant -compfies with ine other provisions of this decree, |Pnlicart is Lntitted to divert up to 603 acre feet of water for nakrng
artificial snow from october 1 to February 29 of any year'
(v)other Limitations.
-20-
c"=" lroe 2cw3zg Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(
t
(
(b) Lawn lrrigation. If stream fl.ow at the Vail Gage drops below 16 c.f.s. during the sununer,
Applicant shall limit irrigation of lawns to one day in every three days, or such that no more than one-third of the total
lawn area is watered in any one day. This provision does not
apply to irrigation of the golf course.
(c) In the event the reservoirs
described in Section III.9, 10, 11, L2, 13, L4, 18, or
Section Iv are constructed, Applicant shall blpass the fesser
of the decreed instream flow water right or the natural. flow
of the stream on which said storage facility is located. If
Applicant is storing water under a water right or change of
water right senior to the instrean flow water right on that
stream and applicant can so demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Division Engineer, or if the change of water right
could be accomplished without injury to the instream flow
nater riqht; e.-9.,' if historic consunptive use water is being
stored a-t, or-?16-wnstream from, its oiiginal point of diver-sion, then Applicant shall not be reguired to make the
described blpass.
(vi) The exchange described in Paragraph 18.A
is senior to the instream flow water rights applied for or
decreed on any of tbe streams in the Gore Creek drainage from
which Applicant diverts htater.
(vii ) The water rights described in Appendix A,
Sections I; II.1-18, 20-22, 24-30; and III.1-3 are senior to
the Colorado Water Conse:rration Board instrean flow appropria-
tions. The changes of water rights and exchanges decreed in
this proceeding nray be acconplished without injury to the
Colorido ltater Conlervation Boa:d instream flow approPria-
tions provided that Applicant complies with the provisj-ons of
this Decree.
(viii) If for any technical reason either Black
take or Black Lake No. 2 is unsuitable for the purposes
outlined herein, Applicant and the Colorado Water Conse:nra-
tion Board shall i6operatively develop reasonable alterna-
tives. If the alternatives are more costly than development
of Black Lake and Black Lake No. 2, t)te parties shalf renego-
tiate the terns of this agreement. If negotiations fail,
either party may invoke retained jurisdiction pursuant to
Paragraph 17.A.
E. Additional Water Storaqe. In addition to auftmen-
t"t:.On waffi-ua-uion reservoirs, and *..c
water available from Green lrlountain Reservoir under a water
service contract with the Bureau of Reclanation, Applicant
nay store nater in its reservoir facilities under water
-2L-
case Nts 2cw32e Vail Valley Consolidated
water District
Water Division No. 5
(
F.f,or the shall be
storage rights which have been or whj.ch may be _d_ecreed for
iJieiioir ltorage facilities listed in Sections III and IV of
app""aii-e-here5f or other reservoir facilities added to this
plln by subsequent decree of tltis court.
Depletion Assunptions e!d--q-a-l-9ulg!ions. Depletions
Vaf IO r r-Gr r'4\"r t'!Ls"
calculated in ttre following manner.
(AxB)+(Cx0.70)+D=E
$IERE:
A = llunicipal water 'diversions, constituting afl
;;tei-'diverted by Appricantrs diversion
facilities which -is -distributed through
Applicantrs potable water delivery systen'
B = Municipal nater depletion factor stated as a
percentage of value rrArt above, tbe percentages
io Ue ap-pfiea on a nonthly basis being aE set
forth in- subparagraph 7.8 above' The per-
centages and- their- nunerical eguivalents
(r'faciort') are as follows:
(
(i) DeDletion Criteria. Subject to the provisions
for retainld' juffirth in- Paragraph 17 beiow,
the iolfowing -crilefia shall apply in fet3rm.rning dep.lelign-s
uliaei-tfri pi5" foi augmentatiori, -(a) depletions attributable
i"-""t"i "iage tliougii ippficant's p6tab1e water- distribution
JisiJr *iff -occur at-tlr6 percentage.r?!e? stated in Subpara-
qiaph Z.A. above; (b) depletions ittributable to golf_course
iiiigation will coirstitule seventy. per.c.er-tt (7O%) of diver-
iioni f,or such use and the remaining thirty percent l?OZl will constitute return flows to Gore Creek; and (c) diver- _ilon" -ioi .itificial snowmaking will constitute a one hundred
;;;;;"4-i:.ooZl-aipletion at trr6 time of diversion because the -return fiows-do riot accrue to Gore Creek until the follolting
Spring.
(ii) DeeleJion CalcYlalion. Based on the foregoing
assumptio"",' a"6e to APplicantrs water
diverlions sha1l be calculated as folfows:
-22-
(
case No. 82CW328 Vail Valley Consolidated
lfater District
water Division No. 5
Multiplying
Factor Month Percentage
5.O%
5.0%
5.o%
5.0%
s.0%
s.o%
t2.9%
re.0%
L7.2%
t3.7%
t6.6%
7.e%
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
June July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.129
0.190
o.L72
0.137
0.166
0.079
(Applicant's diversions of water for municipal
service, f6f golf course irrigation, and for artificial
snowmaking will be limited to the availability of adequlte
replacenent water as provided herein when its water rights
are out-of-priority.
c. The Division Engineer or his autborized repre-
sentative will notify the personnel of the Upper Ea91e.va119V
Consolidated Sanitafion Dfstrict when Applicant's nunicipal
water rights are called out-of-Priority by a valid senior
hrater right located downstream on the Eagle or _the Colorado
Rivers. -During these times, Applicant's water diversions for
nunicipal purpbses shall be considered out-of-priority and
the waier leptetions will be estinated and recorded on a
daily basis iccording to the depletion criteria and calcula-
tionl and the reporting forn as specified in Paragr?Ph 16.The out-of-priority deptetions will be re.placed wee-kly by
strean credit or by releases of augmentation water fron the
reservoirs as described above.
10. Dominion and Control ofl4q4malling -L9!-I-e-9-9Ine!t Runoff
;;;di re
Efffitrangi'ln reservoirs the runoff fron the basin within
wilictr its-snowmaking takes place. so long ag Applicant keeps
accurate records on-the anrount of water applied in snowrnaking
and so long as a reasonable guantification is rnade of all
ioi""" oicu-rring to such water- prior to and during its runoff
Q = water diversions for golf course irrigation.
p = Water diversions for artificial snowmaking.
f, = Total water depletions.
(
-23-
.""" "182crr:28 Vail VaIley Consolidated tfater District tlater Division No. 5 (
(
and recapture, such water can be identified and quantified.
The couri finds that Applicant's plan provides for the
miintenance of Eufficient- control over the replacement runoff
credit from Enowmaking and that the subsequent identification
and direct use or storage of that rater does not injurious_}y
affect any owner or user of vested or decreed conditional
nater rights.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
11. The changes of water rights and plan for- algmentalion
proposed by Aiplicant are suCh as.are cont-emplated-by.-law'
ii -i*pf.re?rte'a ana adninistered in accordance with this
aecrJC, the changes of rrater rights and plan for augme?tation
wi.ff plrmit the ?epletions associated with the g_rovision of
pater by Applicant without adversely affectin-g the oHners or
irsers o-f v?itea nater rights or decreed conditional water
rights in the Eagle Rivei, the Colorado River, o'- any of
ttr5ir tributariesl The changes of water rights and plan fo:
augimentation described herein rnay be lawfully decreed by tttj.s
Court.
L2. The state Engineer and Dj.vision Engineer nay lawfully be
reguired under the terms of this ruling to:
A. Administer the plan for augmentation in ttre manner
set forth herein.
B. Refrain f,ron curtailing out of priority diversions
of Applicantrs Augmented tlater Rights, when the deplettons are
offsEt by the opeiation of the p,lin for augrmentation approved
herein.
c. curtail out-of,-priority diversions by the Appli-
cantrs Augimented Water Ri-ghts at any time when the consunp-
tive use issociated with Applicant's provision of water as
approved herein exceeds tbe net amount of replacenent water
aviif*:.e under the plan for augimentation'
D.rssuewellpernitsforallwellsap.pliedfo-rand
operated in accordanci with the law and conditions of, this
decree.
13. yhether Applicant has rnaintained sufficient control and
aaequaiifi acct'untea for the consumptive losses of the
i"Ui."i-*it.r ai"Lltio pnr"uant to thL water.5i9ttt5_"Oich are
thesubjecthereofforthepurp-oseof.snownakingisaques.. iion ol'iiit to be determinia -rrom all the circumEtances of
I .-\ !'rs lt""i.- fhe only standard to be satisfied is tlre
-24-
(
$:ii t3i'I333"'idated
Water District
water Division No. 5
statutory standard for the approval of a change of water
rights oi plan for augmentation, namely that s-uch change or
plln will hot injuriously affect the owner of or persons
-Lntitled to use nater under a vested water right or decreed
conditional rtater right. c.R.S. $ 37-92-305(3). The Court
has found as a mattei of fact that the subject plan satisfies
that test, subject to the reguirements of the retained jurisdiction.
(
i4. The foregoing findings of fact and concl'usions of law
are fully i.ncorporated herein.
15. It is ORDERED, ADJITDGED, Al{D DECREED by the Court that
ia) the changes of water rights described in the epplication
ind trerein Jre granted, and (b) the plan for augmentation
described in the Application and herein is approved subject
to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
16. Conditions of operation of the Plan:
A. Reporting: Applicantrs water supply and wastewater
facitities_@ated_bytheUpperEag1eVa1leyConsoli.
dated Sanitation District pursuant to a management agreement.
consequently, personnel from that district or 99y successors,
including tie vail Valley Consofidated Water District, ltill
collect [he data and rnaintain the records reguired under this
plan for augrmentation. To assure that the vested water
iiglrts and decreed conditional water rights -of others are
pi5tectea from injury and to as,sure proper adninistration of
this decree, the ApPlicant shaltr:
(i) Develop accountinq forms and--procedures
acceptable' tb ttre Oivision Engineer which will enable the
Divi;ion Engineer to property administer the- cl_'an-ges of water
rights and iugrmentati-on ifan-. These forns shall be available
io-OUjectors -upon regues-t. The adequacy_of thes_e forms and
procedures nay be addressed under proceedings under Subpara-
graph 17.B below.
(ii) on the tenth day of each rnonth' APplicant,
shall fifi a'report with the pivision.Engineer which contains
the following aiily data and information.
a. Applicantts total municipal water diver-
sions and depletions-Ly source and divided..rnto ttre cate-
;;;-i;" -oi rn"-"l.ip"i se?vice, golf course irrigation, and
snowmaking.
JI'DGMENT Al{D DECREE
(
-25-
(
case Nt szcw3zs Vail Valley Consolidated
water District
water Division No. 5
b. Applicantrs out-of-priority water
depletions.
c. The deliveries of replacement water from
tbe various soulces.
d. The operation of Applicalt'F reservoir
facilities includinq watel stored in those facilities and
water released from those facilities consistent with the
policies of the Division Engineer-
e. The amount of water diverted during the
preceding month from the Augnrnented Water Rights;
f. The amount of water diverted for arti-
ficial snowmaking purposes.
This report will be submitted on accounting forms
acceptable to the Division Engineer.
(iii) Applicant will file with the Division.Engineer
by lovemlier SOth- bf each year- a r-epott which_surnmarizes the
nr6nthly water operations Euring thit year.. - Tle .re.port will
le orginized on- the basis of i water -period that begins on
Novern6er 1st and ends on the following October 31st to
correspond to the water year used by the.Division Engineer.
It wili include a full cycle of the Districtrs seasonal water
operations.
(iv) ApPlicant shall make available to Objectors,
upon reguist, coiies of completed accounting fornrs.
B. titonitorinq, '
(i) As reguired by the Division-Engineer, Apnli-
cant shall ionitor ind recoid the flow of water at tlte
triitoric points of diversion for all the ditches with water
m-asuring'devices or stream gaging stations approved by the
Division Engineer.
(ii) AII water diverted for. rnunicipal purPoses
shall be meaiured and recorded on a daily basis'
a. AII pumps diverting groundwater and
surface water Ehall be eqr.lipped with totalizing flow meters.
b. Appropriate neasuring--devices -Qguiqned with continuous recoideri shall be installed at all otber
points of diversj.on.
(
t
-25-
(
case No. 82CW328 Vail Valley Consolidated llater District
lrlater Division No. 5
(iii) The volume of effluent discharged fronr the Vaif wastewater treatnent plant and collected fron the Vail.
Valley Consolidated Water District serruice area for treatment at the Avon wastewater treatrnent plant shall be rneaEured and
recorded on a daily basis. The records sha1l be kept by
Applicant and shall be available for inspection by all
Objectors on reasonable request.
17. Retained Jurisdiction.
A. In order to assure that the vested Hater rights of
others are not injured by irnplementation of the changes of vater rights and plan for augmentation, the Court retains jurisdiction and upon proper petition the court will recon-sider its approval of the changes of water rights and plan
for augmentition. The Court, having nade specific findings
and conclusions regarding the historic use to which the water
rights herein were put and the proposed future use of said
waier rights, determines that a period of ten (10) years will
suffice to determine whether injury is in fact precluded or
needs to be further remedied. The ten (10) year period of
retained jurisdiction shall begin to run on the date of
Applicantrs entry into a service contract for the Green
M-ountain water described herein or uPon notification to the
court and objectors that the augmentation plan is operational utilizing the tin basinr storage contemplated in Paragraph
6.A.(i) herein and described in Sections III and IV of
Appendix A, wttichever occurs first. Applicant shal,I file
n-otice with the Court and serve the same on all Objectors
when it (a) enters into a Green llountain Reservoir Contract
and (b) implements the use of in-basin storage under this
pJan. 'Such notice shall be so f,iled and served within tlirty
igOl days after the relevant event. Such retained juris-
diction-nay be invoked upon a determination of the Court or
upon motion Uy any Person that the absence.of injury has not
bLen conclusively-estaOlished. Any determination or notion
to invoke retainEd jurisdiction shall describe specifj'caI.ly
the tlpe and rnanner-of injury alleged. Subject to extension
as coirtemplated in C.R.S. S 37-92-304(6), if no petition for
reconsideiation is filed within ten (10) years from the date
on which the period of retained jurisdiction be-gins, the
retention of jurisdiction for this purpose shall automat-
ically expire.
B. This Court also retains jurisdiction, which ney be
invoked by any of the parties hefeto 9r by the-Division
Engineer, -for-the purpoles of considering !'he ldeguacy-of apfticant's compliincd with, or the Division Engineerrs
administration of, the provisions hereof. such continuing
jurisdiction may not be -invoked unless a petition to invoke
(
(
-27-
a""" *o.ltct^1328
Vai] Va11eY Consolidated
Water District
water Division No. 5 (
(
(
itandstatingthegroundsthereforisfiledwithintwo(2)
t;";; after tie aare on which rhe act or omission complained
of occurred.
c. The court also retains jurisdiction as to the
guestion of the amount of consumptive use or other losses
oecurringasareEultofartificialsnowmakingandastothe
tteterninition of the timing ancl extent of the snowmelt
credits.APPlicantorotherpartiesrnayfilemotionsinthis
court in this proceeding showing either that the question of
snowmakingconsumPtiveuseandsnowmeltcreditscanbemore specificaify a.fited or that upon the state of knowledge then
"*istitg that retained jurisdiction should be further con-
tinued. rf no such motion is filed, the retained juris-
diction for this issue shall automatically expire five years
from the date when this decree is entered'
D. The provisions for retained jurisdiction in Paragraphs
1?. A, B, and C of this decree are intended to be independent
of each other and do not lirnit each other'
A. The appropriation date of the exchange of Green
l.lountain Reservoir water available under the historic users
pool established by the Final- Ope.rating Poticy is June 15 '
193? based upon th; publication o'f Senate Document 80 which
established the principles under which Green Mountain Peser-
voir was bo be operated to provide htater for the benefit of
users on the west sJ'oPe-
B. The appropriation date of al] other exchanges
approved herein is october 29, 1982 based upon the formation
of-intenttoexchangewaterevidencedonthatdatebythe
filing of the aPPlication.
C. The rights to exchange decreed hereia sha1l be
administered in accordance witlr tbe provisions of c.R.s.'
E Ez-ga-loe.
19. Nothing in this judgrnent and decree shall lre cons"rued
to restrict the alienabiLity of any of the water rights
involved herein.
1.8.Priori t Date of Exchanges and Au ntation PIan.
-28-
(
case NPBzct{328
Vail Valley Consolidated
Water DiEtrict
Water Division No. 5
20. The use of any water right or consumPtion attributable
to any water right involved herein for purposes inconsistent
with this decree shall require subsequent decrees of this
Court.
2I . It is further oRDEP€D that this judgment and decree
shall be filed with the water Clerk and with the State
Engineer anil the Division Engineer for water Division No. 5.
this
Done. at the S/7 day
Springs, Colorado,
. 1985.
BY THE COURT:(
(_- Gavin ----waiel
' Water
State
Dlvision No. 5
of Colorado
Disili,st Cdrrt. Water Division l{0. 5
A lrur copr $ of tecord lhb jEr4 jE--,
ts-6!e-Ot of
'19
. Litwif
(
-29-
(
c""" nnle 2cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
lJater Division No. 5
APPROVED AS TO FORM AI'ID COMENT:
CALKINS, KRAMER, GRII'ISIIAW & HARRING
Date t-
T. Shaun Su]livan (+13487)
Attorneys for Vail Valley
Consolidated Water District
One United Bank Center, Suite 3800
1700 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
Telephone No. (303) 839-3800
KELLY, STN.ISFIEI..D & OIDONMLL
Date:Tinothy J. Flanagan (*5356)
Attorneys for Public Service
Conpany of Coforado
550 Fifteenth Street Suite 900
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone No. (303) 825-3534
wAwE D. WrLLrAlrS (+4152 )
lfrcHAEL L. WALKER $2e281
HENRY C. TEIGEN (+5936)
AI{NE R. AVERY (#9092)
cAsEY S. FUNK (#11638)
Date:[ttorneys Tor the City and County of Denver, acting bY and through its Board of Water Commissioners
1500 West 12th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80254
Telephone No. (303) 623-2500
(
(
-30-
(
,a
case t} 3zcw3zg VaiI ValleY Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
LEAVENWORTH, LOCHIIEAD & MILWID, P.C.
Attorneys for Edwards Water
Distr-ict and the CitY of Rifle
P.O. Drawer 2030
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone No. (303) 945'2261
MOSES, tltI?TEIYtYER, EARRISON and
WOODRUFF, P.C.
Jarnes R. Montgomery (+10989)
Attorneys for Union Oil CornPanY of California
P.O. Box 1440
Boul.der, Colorado 80306
Telephone No. (303) 443-8782
Senior Assistant CitY Attorney
City of Aurora
147-0 South Eavana Street, Suite 820
Aurora, Colorado 80012
Telephone No. (303) 595-7030
Attorney for Eagle CountY
P.O. Box 850
Eagle, Colorado S1531
Telephone No. (303) 328-7311
(
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
(
-31-
(
case Nf 32cw328 Vail VI7..ey Consolidated
Water District Itater Division No. 5
HORN, A}TDERSON A}ID JOHNSON
Date:
Date:
Michael J. Gianunzio (*9741)
Louis A. Johnson (#2003)
Attorneys for the City of Colorado
Springs
840 Holly Sugar Building
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903
Telephone No. (303) 532'3543
FOR TIIE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Attorneys for the State Engineer
and the Division Engineer
1525 Sherman Street, 3rd FJoor
Denver, Colorado 80203
Telephone No. (303) 866-3611
FOR TTIE T'NITED STATES ATTORNEY
GENERAL
TriaI Attorney
Attorney for the United States
U.S. Departnent of Justice
Land anE Natural Resources Division
1961 Stout St., P.O. Drawer 3607
Denver, Colorado 80294
Telephone No. (303) 837-2992
(
Date:
t
-32-
(
a Case NdtdZCw3zS Vail ValleY Consolidated
water District Itater Division No. 5
FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Assistant Attorney General
Attorneys for the Colorado Water
Conservation Board
Natural Resources Section
1525 Shernran St., 3rd Floor
Denver, Coforado 80203
Telephone No. (303) 966-3611
HOLME, ROBERTS & OWEN
Attorneys for VaiI Associates' Inc.
1700 Broadway. Suite 1800
Denver, Colorado 80290
Telephone No. (303) 861-7000
DEI,ANEY & BALCO}ts, P.C.
Robert M. Noone (*L2452)
Attorneys for Objector Berry Creek
Metropolitan District
P.O. Drah'et 79O
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Telephone No. (303) 945'6546
Date:
Date:
(
Date:
(
-33-
(
(
Date:
Date:
Date:
case Hf l2cw328 Vail VaTley Consolidated
Water District
lrtater Division No. 5
DEI,ANEY & BALCOI4B, P.C.
Scott-Balcomb (#1375)
Robert M. Noone (*L24521
Attorneys for Arrowhead at Vail
P.O. Drawer 790
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Telephone No. (303) 945-5545
DELANEY & BALCOI|IB, P.C.
Robert M. Noone (*12452')
Attorneys for Eagle-Vail lletropoli-
tan District
P.O. Drawer 790
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Telephone No. (303) 945-6546
DELANEY & BALCOMB, P.C.
Robert M. Noone (*12432,
Attorneys for Benchmark at Beaver Creek
P.O. Drawer 790
Glenwood Springs, Col.orado 81602
Telephone No. (303) 945-5545
(
-34-
(
a I Case NoY 82Cw328 Vail Valley consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
DELANEY & BALCOI4B, P.C.
Robert M. Noone (*L2452,
Attorneys for Avon MetroPolitan District
P.O. Drawer 790
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Telephone No. (303) 945-6546
Date:
(
(
-35-
(
c"se rO szcwrzl Vail VarreY Consolidated
water District
water Division No. 5
Case No. 82CW328
Water Division No. 5
APPEIiIDIX A
IIIDEX OF RIGHTS AND STRUCTI'RE5
Paoe No.
A-4
A-4
A-4
A-4
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-6
A-6
A-6
A-6
A-6
A-7
A-7
A-7
A-7
A-8
A-8
A-8
A-8
A-8
A-9
A-9
A-9
A-10
A-10
A-10
A-10
A-10
A-11
A-11
A-11
A-1.1
A-L2
A-12
I.Historic Irrigation Direct FLow water Rights
1. Mann Ditch 2. t{ebb Ditch 3. Larzalere Ditch
Frank Larzalere Ditch
Scoville Ditch
Saw Mi1l Ditch
Shively Ditch
4.
5.
5.
7.
(
8. McMonag1e Ditch 9. Bryant Lower Ditch 10. Sandstone Ditch
1.1. Park Ditch 12. Spraddle Ditch
13. Buffehr and Rose Ditch ],4. Rose Ditch 15. Ruder No. 1 Ditch 16. Rose Ditch 1st Enlargement
L'7. Rose Ditch lst Enlargenent 18. Ruder No. I Ditch 1st Enlargement
19. Bryant Lower Ditch lst Enlargement
20. Katsos Ditch 27. Katsos No. 2 Ditch 22. KiahtiPes No. I Ditch
23. KaihtiPes No. 2 Ditch
24. KiahtiPes No. 3 Ditch'25. KiahtiPes No. 6 Ditch
26. Spraddle No. 2 Ditch
27. B1ack Gore Ditch
28. Webb Ditch 1st Enlargement
29. Sawmill Ditch lst Enlargement
30. Frank Larzalere Ditch 1st Enlargement
31. Sandstone Ditch lst Enlargement
32. Larzalere Ditch lst Enlargenent
33. Main Gore Ditch 34. Iriann Ditch lst Enlargement
35. Edward Ditch 36. Mike Ditch ,7. Buffehr and Rose Ditch lst Enlargement
(
A-1
case a g2aisze
Vail Varley Consolidated lfater District
Water Division No. 5
(
(
II. t{unicipa} Year-Round Direct Flow Water Rights 1. vail Village West WelI No. 1 2. Vail Village West Well No. 2 3. Vail Village West Well No. 3 4. Vail Village lfest Well No. 4 5. vail village llest WeLI No. 5 6. Vail Village west Well No, 6 7. E.C.D.C. Gallery (Black Gore Infiltration Gallery, GWiACWS Pt.B)8. Hoyt Pipeline 9. Bighorn Pipeline (Gore Valley lfater Authority Comnittee Water SYstem,
Point C)10. trlain Gore Municipal Ditch and Pipeline 11. Bighorn Fish Pond Ditch L2. Red Sandstone Gallery (Lion's Ridge
Water Treatment Pfant, G\tllACttS Pt.A)13. Tourist Trap Spring l+. Town of Vail Spring TaPs 15. Gore Creek Water Treatment P]ant Intake 16. Golden Peak Snownaking 17. Booth Creek water Treatment Plant Intake 18. Gore Creek Intake for Booth Creek
Treatment Plant
Gore creek Intake for Booth Creek
Treatnent Plant, First Enlargernent
Log Chute Punp Station
Nurnber 245 Pumphouse and Pond
Plow Spring
Gore Valley water Authority Conmittee tlater System Vail Water and Sanitation District
tJell No. 1 ,25. Vail Water and Sanitation District
WeII No. 2 26. Vail tiater and Sanitation District
We]l No. 1 27. Vail t{ater and Sanitation District lfell No. 2 28. Vaif Water and Sanitation District
spring and Pipeline-A 29, VaiI water and Sanitation District
Spring and Pipeline-B 30. vlil water and sanitation District
Spring and Pipeline-C
19.
20.
2r.
22.
23.
24.
A-L2
A.L2
A-T2
A-13
A-13
A-13
A-13
A-14
A-14
A-14
A-14
A-15
A-15
A-15
A-15
A-15
A-16
A-15
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-17
A-17
A-18
A-18
A-18
A-19
A-19
A-19
A-19
t
A-2
(
case NtBzcw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
water District
Water Division No. 5
A-20
A-20
A-20
A-20
A-20
A-21
A-2L
A-2L
A-2t
A-22
A-22
A-22
A-22
A-22
A-23
A-23
A-23
A-23
A-24
A-24
A-24
A-25
A-25
A-2s
A-25
A-25
A-26
A-27
A-27
A-27
A-27
A-28
A-28
A-28
A-28
A-29
l-rt
A-29
A-30
A-30
A-30
(
III. Decreed Storage Rights 1. Fleming Storage Tank 2. E.C.D.C. Reservoir 3. Eoyt Reservoir 4. K.A.C. Reservoir 5. M111 Creek Reservoir No. 1 6. MilI Creek Reservoir No. 2 7. Golf Course Reservoir No. 1 8. Golf Course Reservoir No. 2 9. Red Sandstone Reservoir
10. Black Gore Creek Reservoir No. 1 11. Black Gore creek Reservoir No. 2 L2. Black Gore Creek Reservoir No. 3 13. Indian Creeh Reservoir L4. Red Sandstone Reservoir No. 2
15. Black Lake 16. Black Lake No. 2 L7. Black Lake No. 2, lst Enlargement 18. Vail VaIIey Reservoir
Iv. Undecreed tdater Storage Rights and Structures 1. Vail Valley Reservoir No. 2
V. Structures to Be Augrmented 1. BIack Gore Infiltration Gallery (E.c.D.C. Ga1fery & GWACWS Pt.B)
Bighorn/Gore Val.ley PumPhouse
Gore Creek Intake for Booth Creek
Treatment Plant 4. Booth Creek irtater Treatnent Pl.ant fntake
5. VaiI Valley Consolidated WelI No. R1
6. Vail Valley Consolidaled Well No. R2
7. Vail ValIey Consolidated Well No. R3
8. Vail. Valley Consolidated Well No. R4
9. Vail Valley Consolidated Well No. R5
10. Vail Val.ley Consolidated WelI No. R5
11. Vail GoIf Course Ditch L2. Gore Creek Water Treatnent Plant Intake
13. Golden Peak Snowmaking 14. Vail Village ttest Well No. 1
15. Vail Village West Well No. 6
16. Vail village West tlell No. 7
L7. Vail Village t{est Well No. 8
18. Vail Intermountain Well No. 2
19. Vail Intermountain llell No. 4
(Gore Creek WeII No - 24094'8,
20. Tourist TraP SPring 2L. Town of VaiI SPring TaPs
22. Log Chute PumP Station
2.
3.
t
A-3
c.". J e2cw32s Vail Varley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(t 23. Nurnber 245 Punphouse and Pond A-30 24. Plow Spring A-31 25. Vail Associates Gore Creek
Snowmaking Point B. A-31
(
(
A-4
c.=" eB2cw32s Vail ValLey Consolidated
Water District tfater Division No. 5
(
DESCRIPTION OF RIGHTS A}ID STRUC:rURES
I.Historic Irrigation Direc! Flow water Rights:
1.2.0 c.f.s. decreed to the Mann Ditch, out of
Booth Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek,
Priority No. 99 in old Water District No. 37,with adjudication date of June 29, 1894, .and appropriation date of May 1, 1890, Civil
A-ction No. 294, 1981 Basin Rank 735. Headgate
Location: on the west bank of Booth Creek at
a point near the NE corner of the t{El/4 of the
sE7/4 of Section 3, Township 5 South, Range 80
west, 6th P.M.
1.6 c.f.s. decreed to the Webb Ditch, out of
Pitkin Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek,
Priority No. 118 in old Water District No. 37'
with adludication date of June 29, 1894, ald
appropriation date of Augrust 27, L892, Civil
Action No. 294, 1981 Basin Rank 847. Eeadgate
Location: at a point on the west bank of
Pitkin Creek whente the witness corner to the
Et/4 corner of Section 11, Township 5 South,
Range 80 West, 5th P.l,:. bears Souttr, 5"53'
West, 1,580.5 feet.
2.3 c.f.s decreed to the tarzalere Ditch, out
of Middle Creek, a tributaty of Gore Creek,
Priority No. 121 in o1d Water District No. 37,
wittr adJudication date of June 29, 1894, .and appropriation date of october 6, 1892, Civil
ALtion No. 294, t98f Basin Rank 850. Beadgate
location: on the west bank of tttiddle Creek'
at a point near the NEl/4 corner of the Sw7/4
of thi sEL/4 of Section 6, Township 5 Souttr,
Range 80 West, 5th P.I,l.
1.2 c.f.s. decreed to the Frank Larzalere
Ditch, out of !1i11 Creek, Priority No. 1,22. in
old Water District No. 37, with adjudication
date of June 29, 1894, and appropriation date
of October 10, 1892, Civi] Action No. 294'
1981 Basin Rank 851. Headgate location: on
the west bank of Saw llitl -Creek, at a Point near the Sw7/4 of the NE!/4 of Section 8,
Township 5 Souttt, Range 80 Vlest' 6th P.U.
2.4 c.f.s. decreed to the Scoville Ditch, out
of Middle Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek,
2.
4.
t 5.
A-5
(
t
6.
case N? B2cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
Priority No. 123 in old water District No. 37,with adjudication date of June 29, 1894, and
appropriation date of October 20, L892 ' Civil
action No. 294, 1981 Basin Rank 853. Ileadgate Iocation: on the east bank of Middle Creek,
at a point in the M'I]../4 of the Svll/4 of
Section 6, Township 5 South, Range 80 West,
6th P.M.
1.2 c.f.s. decreed to the Saw tlill Ditch, out
of t{ill Creek, a tributary of Gore CreeX,
Priority No. 128 in old water District No- 37,
with adJudication date of June 29, 1894' and
appropriation date of Novenber 1, 1992, Civil
Aclion No. 294, 1981 Basin Rank 854. Ileadgate
location: on the east bank of Saw MiIl Creek,
at a point near the SW corner of the SWl/4 of
the Wtt/+ of Section 8, Tonnship 5 Souttr,
Range 80 West, 5th P.l'r.
1.2 c.f.s. decreed to the Shively Ditch, out
of Gore Creek, Priority No. 125 in old llater
District No. 37, with adjudication date of
June 29, 7894, and appropriation date of
November 1, t892, Civil Action No. 294, 1981
Basin Rank 854. Headgate location: on the
south bank of Gore Creek at a point 200 feet
north of the NE corner of the NE1,/4 M1rz4 of
Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 west'
5th P.M.
2.5 c.f .s. decreed to the llcMonagle Ditch, out
of Red Sandstone Creek, a tributary of Gore
Creek, Priority No. 281 in old l'Jater District
No. 37, with adjudication date of February 12,
1909, and appropriation date of December 13,
1900, Civil- Action No. 512, 1981 Basin Rank
1665, Headgate location: in the NE!/4 sEL/4
of Section 1, Township 5 South, Range 81 West,
5th P.!,1.
4.5 c.f.s decreed to the Bryant Lower Ditch,
out of Gore Creek, Priority No. 301 in old
Water District No. 37, with adjudication date
of February 27, 1912, and appropriation'date
of June 1.5; 1902, Civil Action No. 573, 1981
Aisin Rank 195?. Headgate lo.cation: in the
sEt/4 SWL/4 NE]./4 of Section L2, ?ovnship 5
South, Range 81 VJest, 6th P.M.
7.
(
8.
9.
A-6
case NOBzcw328 Vail Varley Consolidated lrater District liater Division No. 5
(
(
10.
11.
L2.
13.
0.5 c.f.s. decreed to the Sandstone Ditch, out
of Red Sandstone Creek, a tributary of Gore
Creek, Priority No. 342 in old !{ater District
No. 37, with adjudication date of June 23,
1919, and appropriation date of June 2, 1913,
Civil Action No. 71I, 1981 Basin Rank 2358.
lleadgate location: at a point on the east
bank of Sandstone Creek whence the NW corner
of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West,
6th P.M. bears South 11oE, 900 feet.
0.8 c.f.s. decreed to the Park Ditch, out of
Park Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek, Pri-
ority No. 344 in old hrater District No. 3?,
with- adjudication date of June 23, 1919'. ?ld appropriation date of June 15, L9t4, Civil
AAUon No. 712, 1981 Basin Rank 2359- Head-
gate location: on the west bank of Park Creek
it a point whence the N1/4 corner of Sec-
tion 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 YJest, 6ttl
P.!1., bears North 18o45r East, 1,550 feet.
0.5 c.f.s. decreed to the Spraddle Ditch, out
of Spraddle Creek, a tributary of Gore. Creek'
rrioiity No. 343 in old water District No. 37,
with adludication date of June 23' 1919'. ?nd appropriation date of June 15, 1916, civil
ALtion No. 712, 1981 Basin Rank 2360. Ilead-
gate location: at a point on the west bank of
Spraddle Creek whence the NE corner of Sec-
tion 7, Township 5 south, Range 80 West, 6th
P.M. bears North,630 East, 100 feet.
4.04 c.f.s. decreed to the Buffehr and Rose
Ditch, out of Gore creek, Priority No. 409 in
old Water District No. 37, with adjudication
date of October 3, 1936, and appropriation
date of lrlay 1, 1910, Civil Action No. 953,
1981 Basin Rank 27'14. Headgate location (per
change in Case No. tl-2479): at a point.on the
SE blnk of Gore Creek 75 feet west of the NE
corner of the swl/4 NEI/4 of Section 12'
Township 5 South, Range 81 west, 6th P.llt.
0.59 c.f.s. decreed to the Rose Ditch, qut of
Red Sandstone Creek, a tributary of Gore.
Creek, Priority No. 415 in old water Distrj.ct
No. 3i, with adjudication date of October 3,
1936, and appropriation date of !!ay 1, !!!-2,civii Actio-n- No. 963, 1981 Basin Rank 2779'
(
14.
A-7
Case Vail lfater
lfater
Ileadgate location (per change in Case No.
11-24781: at a point on the West bank of Gore
Creek 150 feet West of the l{E corner of the
Sw1,/4 NEI/4 of Section L2, Township 5 South,
Range 81 West, 5th P.M.
0.59 c.f.s. decreed to the Ruder No. L Ditch,
out of Gore Creek, Priority No. 388 in old
Water District No. 37, with adjudication date
of october 3, 1936 and appropriation date of
June 1, 1900, Civil Action No. 963, X981 Basin
Rank 2?57. Eeadgate location: at a point
whence the NE corner of the !trt/l-/4 !fW1,/4 of
Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West,
6th P.lit. bears North 29"21t lfest,
3,116.19 feet.
0.59 c.f.s. decreed to the Rose Ditch First
Enlargement, out of Red Sandstone Creek' I tributary of Gore Creek, Priority No..{23,in
o1d Water District No. 37, with adjudication
date of October 3, 1936, and appropriation
date of t{ay 1, 1915, Civil Action No. 963,
1981 Basin-Rank 2784. Headgate }ocation: in
the NE1/4 SEI/4, Section 1, Township 5 South,
Range 81 lfest, 6th P.lil.
1.33 c.f.s. decreed to the Rose Ditch First
Enlargement, out of Red Sandstone Creek, a
tribuiary of Gore Creek, Priority No..423.in
old Water District No. 37, with adjudication
date of October 3, 1935, and appropriation
date of May l, 1915, Civil Action No. 953,
1981 Basin Rank 2784. Headgate focation: in
the M1,/4 SEL/ , Section 1, Township 5 South,
Range 81 Uest, 6tlt P.M.
0.59 c.f.s decreed to the Ruder No- 1 Ditch
First Enlargement, out of Gore Creek, Priority
No. 444 in -ofa water District No. 37' with
adjudication date of octobet 3, 1936 and
appropriation date of June 1, 1920' Civil-
A;iio; No. 963, 1981 Basin Rank 2800. Head-
gate location: at a point w-hence the NE
iorner of the ltryt]-/4 Ntll/4 of Section 14'
Township 5 South. Range 8l West, 6th P.ttl.
bears North 29o2L' lrfest, 3,116.-19 feet.
0.5 c.f.s. decreed to Bryant Lolter Ditch First
Eniargement, out of Goie Creek, Priority
O rr.n *Valley Consolidated Disttict Division No. 5
(
15.
l.7.
16.
(
18.
(
19.
A-8
(
c""" C szcw3zl vail Valley Consolidated
water District
water Division No. 5
No. 471 in old lvater District No. 37, with
adjudication date of October 3, 1935, and
appropriation date of June 15, L927, Civil
Action No. 963, 1981 Basin Rank 2821. llead-gate }ocation: in the SEI/4 SVf1/4 t{E1,/4 of
Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West,
6th P.M.
2.8 c.f.s. decreed to the Katsos Ditch, out of
Booth Creek, a tributary of Gore creek.
Priority No. 485 in o1d water District No. 37,with adjudication date of February 7, 1956,
and appropriation date of June 1, 1913' Civil Action No. 1128, 1981 Basin Rank 3299.
Headgate focation: at a point on the East
bank of Booth Creek whence the witness corner to the Et/4 corner of Section 11, Township 5
South, Range 80 west, 6th F.l,l. bears South
50020t East, 6,666.4 feet.
3.3 c.f.s. decreed to the Katsos No. 2 Ditch,
out of an unnaned tributary to Gore Creek,
Priority No. 488 in old Water District No. 37,
uith adjudication date of Februar! 7, 1956,
and appropriation date of June 1, 1913' Civil Action No. 1128, 1981 Basin Rank 3299.
Iteadgate location: at a point on the East
bank of an unnaned tributary of Gore Creek
whence the witness corner to the El,/4 corner
of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 80
west, 5th P.M. bears South 73043r East,
5,195.6 feet. I
!.5 c.f.s. decreed to the Kiahtipes l{o. I
Ditch, out of an unnarned tributary to Black
Gore Creek, Priority No. 487 in old t{ater
District No. 3?, with adjudication date of
February 7, 1956, and appropriation date of
June 1, 1913, civil Action No. 1128, 1981
Basin Rank 3299. tteadgate location: at a point whence the N1/4 corner of Section 18,
Township 5 South, Range 79 West, 5th P.I-|.
bears North 28030r East, 2,580.3 feet.
1.0 c.f.B. decreed to the Kiabtipes No. 2
Ditch, out of aD unnaned tributary to Gore
Creek, Priority No. 489 in old Water District
No. 3?, vith adjudication dat'e of February 7,
1956, and appropriation date of June 1' 1913'
Civil Action No. 1128, 1981 Basin Rank 3299-
(
20.
2t.
22.
(
23.
A-9
(
.""" O 82ct{328 Vail ValIeY Consolidated l{ater District
Water Division No. 5
Headgate locations: Headgate number 1 is
located at a point lthence the N1rz4 corner of
Section 18, Township 5 South, Range 79 West,
6th P.M. bears North 81o08t East, ?,03L.2 'rfeet; headgate nurnber 2 is located at a point
whence the N1-/4 corner of the 6arne said
Section 18 bears South 85050r East, 3,695.6
feet.
24. 3.4 c.f.s. decreed to Kiahtipes No. 3 Ditch,out of an unnamed tributary to Gore Creek,
Priority No. 490 in old t{ater District No. 37,with adjudication date of Februar! 7 ' 1956'
and appiopriation date of June 1, 1913' Civil Action No. 1128, 1981 Basin Rank 3299.
Headgate locations: headgate number 1 is
locaied at a point from which the witness
corner to the vll/4 corner of Section 12,
Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th P.l'l .
bears North 39o03r West, 3,008.7 feet; head-
gate nuiber 2 is located at a point from which
said witness corner bears South 8Lo24r East,
359.3 feet.
25. 1.0 c.f.s. decreed to Kiahtipes No. 6 Ditch,out of Pitkin Creek, a tributary of Gore
Creek, Priority No. 491 in old water District
No. 37, with adjudication date of FebruarY 7,
1956, and appropriation date of June 1, 1913,
Civil Action No. Lt2g, 1981 Basin Rank 3299.
Headgate location: at a point from whence the
witness corner to the W1/4 corDer of Sec-
tion 12, Township 5 South, Range 80 West' 6th
P.M. bears South 7"57t West, I,775.2 feet-
26. 2.o c.f.s. decreed to Spraddle No. 2 Ditch,
out of Spraddle Creek. a tributary of. Gore
Creek, pfiority No. 492 in old tlater District
No. 37, with adjudication date of FebruatY 7,
1955, and appropriation date of June 10, 19f3,
Civil Action No. 1128, 1981 Basin Rank 3300.
Headgate location: at a point on the West
bank-of Spraddle Creek whence the NE corner of
Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 l{est'
6th P.M. bears North 630 East 100 feet.
4.4 c.f .s. decreed to the Black Gore Ditch,
oui of Black Gore creek, Priority No' 499 in
old l{ater District No. 37, with adjudication
date of FebruatY 7, 1955, and appropriatj'on
t
C
27.
A-10
(
c."" ul s2cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
date of uay 12, 1936, Civil Action No. 1128,
1981 Basin Rank 3306. Headgate location: in
the llt{1/4 WL/4, Section 18, Township 5 South,
Range 80 Vlest, 6th P.tt.
2.52 c.f.s. decreed to the Webb Ditch First
Enlargement, out of Pitkin Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek, Priority No. 500 in old Water District No. 3?, with adjudication date of
February 7, 1955, and appropriation date of
July 31 , 1934, Civil Action No. 1128, 1981
Basin Rank 3307. Beadgate location: in the
SWl-/4 SWL/4, Section 1, Township 5 South,
Range 80 liest, 5th P.M.
3.0 c.f.s. decreed to the Sawmill Ditch First
Enlargement, out of !1i11 Creek, a tributary of
core Creek, Priority No. 502 in old water District No. 37, with adjudication date of
February 7, 1955, and appropriation date of
August 3L, 1939, Civil Action No. 1128, 1981
Basin Rank 3444. Headgate location: at a point on the East side of Sasr titill Creek
whence the N1,/4 corner of Section 8, Town-
ship 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th P.M. bears
North 7o37t East. 2,9L5.2 feet.
1.0 c.f.s. decreed to the Frank tarzalere
Ditch First Enlargement, out of MiIl Creek, a
tributary of Gore Creek, Priority No. 503 in old llater District No. 37, with adjudication
date of Februat! 7, 1956, and appropriation
date of May 19, 7.943, Civil Action No. 1128,
1981 Basin Rank 3634. Ileadgate location: at a point on the west bank of saw llill Creek
whence the ![W corner of Section 7, Township 5
South, Range 80 West, 6th P.I{. bears North
69045' lfest, 7,153.2 feet.
2.7 c.f .s. decreed to the Sandstone Ditch
First Enlargement, out of Red Sandstone Creek,
a tributary of Gore Creek, Priority No. 504 in
old tater District No. 37, with adjudication
date of February 7, 1956, and appropriation
date of ilay 15, L944, Civil Action No. 1128,
1981 Basin-Rank 3836. Headgate Jocation: at
a point on the East bank of Sandstone Creek
whence the t{W corner of Section 7, Township 5
South, Range 80 West, 6tb P.I.l. bears South
11o00r EaEt, 900 feet.
(
28.
29.
30.
31.
A-11
c"". tl B2cw328 Vail Valley Consolidated
Ytater District
Water Division No. 5
(
34.
32.
33.
36.
6.2 c.f.s. decreed to the Larzalere Ditch First Enlargement, out of Middle Creek, a tributary of core Creek, Priority No. 506 in old l{ater District No. 37, wit}r adjudication
date of Februat! 7, 1956, and appropriation
date of t{ay 15, 1946, civil Action No. 1128,
1981 Basin Rank 3903. tseadgate location: at a point on the West bank of Middle Creek
whence the SW corner of Section 5, Township 5
South, Range 80 West, 6th P.M. bears south
74oL7 r, west 4,009.5 feet,
1.0 c.f.s. decreed to the Main Gore Ditch, out
of Gore Creek, Priority No. 512 in old Water
District No. 37, with adjudication date of
February 7, 1956, and appropriation date of
July 19, 1951, civil Action No. 1128, 19S1
Basln Rank 4183. Headgate location: in the
M^t1,/4 l{8t/4, Section 1.8, Township 5 South,
Range 79 West, 6th P.M.
4.2 c.f .a. decreed to the llann Ditch First
Enlargement, out of Booth Creek, a tributary of Goie creek, Priority No. 513 in old water
District No. 37, with adjudication date of
February 7, L956, and appropriation date of
July 23, 1951, Civil Action No. 1128, 1981
Basin Rank 4185. Headgate Jocation: on the
west bank of Booth Creek at a point whence ttre
witness corner of Section 11, Tovrnship 5
South, Range 80 t{est, 6th P.l{. bears Sout}r 52o
48 I East, 6,564.1 feet.
2.0 c.f.s. decreed to the Edward Ditch' out of
Red Sandstone Creek, a tributary to Gore
Creek, Priority No. 523 in o1d t{ater District
No. 37, with adjudication date of July 23,
1958, and appropriation date of June 30, 1936'
civil Action No. 1193, 1981 Basin Rank 4442.
Iteadgate location: in ttre SEI/4 SEL/4,
Section 1, Townstrip 5 Souttt, Range 81 West,
6th P.t'1.
2,0 c.f.s. decreed to the Mike Ditch, out of
Red Sandstone Creek, a tributary of Gore
Creek, Priority No. 524 in old water District
No. 3?, with iAjudication date of July 23, -1958, and appropriation date of JuIy 31, +?16'civil Action No. 1193, 1981 Basin Rank 4443.
Headgate Location: in the t{EL/4 SEf/4,
(
35.
(
A-12
(
Case No. 82CW328 Vail Valley Consolidated llater District
Water Division No. 5
Section 1, ?ownship 6 South, Range 81 l{est,
5th P.M.
1.17 c.f.s. decreed to the Buffehr and Rose Ditch First Enlargement, out of Gore Creek,Priority No. 540 in o1d water District No. 37,with adjudication date of July 23, 1958, and appropriation date of May 31, 1955, Civil Action No. 1193. 1981 Basin Rank 4457.
Headgate location: (per change in case
No. W-2479): at a point on the sE bank of core Creek 75 feet Vtest of the NE corner of the swl/4 t{EL/4 of Section 12, Township 5
South, Range 8l West, 6th P.l.l.
0.255 c.f.s. decreed to Vail Village West WelI
No. 1 (Pennit No. 10474-F), out of the allu-
vium of Gore Creek, with adjudication date of
December 31, 1972 and appropriation date of
September 15, 1963, Case No. w-711, 1981 Basin
Ranh 4914. Point of diversion: at a point
1,010 feet East of the West section Line, and
1,930 feet North of the South section line of
Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of
the 6th P.M.
O.222 c.f.s. decreed to Vail ViIIage l{est WeII
No. 2 (Permit No. 4520-F), out of the alluvium of core Creek, with adjudication date of
Decenber 31, 1972 and appropriation date of
December 31, 1965, Case No. w-711, L981 Basin
Rank 5043. Point of diversion: in the !{W1l4
Swl/4 of Section t2, Township 5 South, Range
81 West of the 6th P.M. at a point L,260 feet
East of the tiest section line and 1,930 feet
North of the South section line of said
Section 12.
0.334 c.f.s. decreed to vail villagre west well
No. 3 (Permit No. 11431-F) out of the alluviun
of core Creek, with adjudication date of
Decernber 21, 1972 and appropriation date of
December 23, 1966, Case -No. vi-?11, 1981 Basin
Rank 5144. Point of diversion: in the SEI/4
SEL/4, Section 11, Township 5, Souttt, Range 81
West of 6th P.M. at a point T2O feet West of
the East section line and 330 feet North of
the South section line of Section 11.
37.
II. llunicipal Year-Round Direct Flow Water Rights:
1.
(
2.
3.
(
A-13
(
.u". O B2cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated tlater District
Water Division No. 5
0.111 c.f.s. decreed to Vail Village West well
No. 4 (Permit No. 12998-F), out of the a]lu-viun of Gore Creek, adjudication date of
Decenber 31, I97Z and appropriation date of
October 18, 1963, Case No. rd-711, 1981 Basin
Rank 4921. Point of diversion: at a point
L,990 feet East of the West section line and
2,O2O feet North of the South section line of
Section 12, lownship 5 South, Range 81 West of
the 6th P.M.
0.033 c,f.s. decreed to Vail ViIIage West Well
No. 5 (Permit No. 4881-F), out of the alluvium of core Creek, with adjudication date of
December 31, 1972 and appropriation date of
May 19, 1968, Case No. w-711, 1981 Basin Rank 5228. Point of diversion: in the NEI/4 SvlL/4 of Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of 6th P.M. at a point 1,940 feet East of the
west section line and 2,000 feet North of the
South section line of Section 12.
0.65 c.f.s. decreed to vail Village West t{e}l
No. 6 (Pernit No. 17460-F), out of the allu-
vium of Gore Creek, adjudication date of April 14, 1975 and appropriation date of
May 31 , 1972, Case No. W-2457. Point of diversion: at a point 1,545 feet North of the
South section line and 750 feet East of the
West section line in the lntf1,/4 SulL/4 of
Section 12, Township 5 Soutlr, Range 81 lfest of
the 5th P.M. r
0.25 c.f.s. decreed to the E.c.D.c. Gallery (also known as Black Gore Infiltration Gallery, and Gore valley water Authority
Conmittee water Systern, Point B) out of Black
Gore Creek, with adjudication date of May 31'
L972, and appropriation date of April 4, 1963,Civil Action No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5057.
Point of diversion: at a point whence the
west guarter corner of Section 18, Township 5
South, Range 79 l{est of the 5th P.lll. bears
south 5ro27 | lfest a distance of 1,264 feet'
10.0 c.f.s. conditionally decreed to the Hoyt
Pioeline out of Black Gore Creek. with adju-
diiation date of May 31 , l9?2', and appropria-
tion date of April 4, 1953, Civil Action
No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5057. Point of
4.
5.
6.
(
7.
("
8.
A-14
case x.Oe zcw3?B Vail valley Consolidated
tfater District
Water Division No. 5
(
(
diversion: a point on the tfest bank of Black
Gore Creek whdnce the Northwest corner of
Section 18, Township 5 Souttt, Range 79 West,
6th P.M. bears North 2ooztr lfest, 3,311 feet'
This structure rlas never built and does not
exist as a phYsical structure.
g. 1.6 c.f.s. decreed to the Bighorn PipeLine out
of Bighorn Creek, a tribu-tary oq Gore creel(,
with idjudication date of May 31, 1-972,. and
approprfation date of April-a'-l?9?: ci-vr,r
A;tio; No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5057. Polnt
oi aiversiont a point on tJlre west bank of
Bighorn Creek whenlce the Northwest corner of
ii6tion 12, Torvnship 5 south, Range 80 west-of
the 6th P.M. bears North 6lo4t l{est, 2'737'66
feet. This structure no longer exists as a
physical structure.
10. 10.0 c.f.s. conditional'ly decreed to the ltain - Gore Hunicipal Ditch and Pipeline, out of Gore
Creek, with-adjudication date of May 31, l?72,
ina aipropriation date of lpr-il -4,-^1-9-63, -Ci.vi1 actioir- No-. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5057' Polnt
oi aiversion, a point on the North bank of
Gore Creek whence- the Northwest corner of
itction 18, Township 5 South, Range 79 West of
the 6th P.M. bears North 61024r West, 1,863
fdet. This structure was never built and does
not exist as a PhYsical structure.
11. 4.0 c.f.s. decreed to Bighorn Fish Pond Ditch
out of Bighorn Creek,. a tributary of -Gore iieef, witi adjudication date of lttay 3-1 , 1.972
and appropriation date of .Apr-it -4'- 1-9i3, -Civil actio-n- Xo-. L529, 1981 Basin Rank 5057' Point
of diversion: a point on the right or
w-sterly bank of Bighorn Creek whence ttle Nvt
ioiner -of section 12, lownshiP 5 Souttr,-
Range 80 lfest, 6th P.M. bears North 47o 11 |
ifest, 2,549.71 feet-
!2. 2.22 c.f 's. decreed to Red Sandstone Gallery
i"fio known as Ligll's Ridge water Treaunent
ifant and Gore Valley tJater Authority- C-on--
mittee Water system, Point A)' out ot Reo
Sandstone Creek, a tributary of Gore -Creek,;iih- aajuaication date of May -31,- ^1972 -and ippiopi{ation date of January 3-, -1^9-6:'
civil
A-ctioil No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5273' Point t
A-15
(
""". 'lr zcw3zg Vail Va.ley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
of diversion: it a point from which the
Northeast corner of the SEI/4 SEL/4 of,
Section 1, Township 5 South, Range 81 west of
tlre 6th P.M. bears North S0o4t East, 185 f,eet.
0.133 c.f.s. decreed to the Tourist Trap
Spring. out of the MilI Creek alluviun, with
a-djudication date of December 31 , t9'73, and
appropriation date of January 1, t962' Case
N-o-. w:2167, 1981 Basin Rank 5932. Point of
diversion: in Section 17, Township 5 South,
Range 80 lfest of the 5th P.M. at a. point _whence the Northwest corner of Section I of
said Township and Range bears North 19012 t
lfest, 8,950 feet.
0.78 c.f.s. decreed to the Town of Vail'
sDrinqs Taps, out of the Mill Creek alluvium,witn iajudication date of Decenber 31, 1973,
and appropriation date of June 1, t962., Case
No. w-2t07, 1978 Basin Rank 5901. Point of
diversion: wittrin a 100 foot diameter circle,
from the center of which the west quarter
corner of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range
80 West of the 6th ?.!.1. bears North 50o West
364 feet.
1.9 c.f.s. decreed to the Gore Creek Water
Treatment Plant Intake, out of Gore Creek,
vith adjudication date of December 31 , 1973,
and appropriation date of July 6, 1965, case
Uo. w-2107, 1981.Basin Rank 5951. Poi.nt of
diversion: on tlie left bank of Gore Creek in
ttre l{W1l4 }n 1/4 of Section 9, Township 5
South, Range 80 Uest of the 6th P.ttt., at a
point whenle ttre Northwest corner of said
3ection 9 bears North 03o00r tfest 1,100 feet-
1.34 e.f.s. decreed to Golden Peak Snowmaking,
out of tlill Creek, a tributary to Gore Creek,
with adjudication date of December 31, 1973'
and appropriation date of January- 1, 19_65,,
case fr6. *-ztoz, 1991 Basin Rank 5953. Point
of diversion: on the East bank of Uil]' Creek
in the ltEI/4 Sw7/4 of Section 8, Township 5
Soutlr, Range 80 West of the 6tb P.U- at a
point whenie the Northw^e-st corner of said -section 8 bears North 38035' West 3,500 feet'
13.
14.
(
15.
15.
L
A-15
c"". O 82cw328 Vail ValleY Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(
(
L7.
18.
19.
20.
3.23 c.f.s. absolutely decreed and 2.57 c.f.s.
conditionally decreed to Booth Creek Water
Treatrnent Plant Intake out of Booth Creek, a
tributary of core Creek, with adjudication
date of becember 3l , t973, and appropriation
date of January t, 1-97r., Case No. W-2157' 1981
Basin Rank 5982. Point of diversion: on the
left bank of Booth Creek in the SWI/4 l{w1l4 of
Section 2, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of
the 6th P.M., at a point whence the West
guarter corner of said Section 2 bears South
54"00' lrest 400 feet. 0.55 c.f.s. of the 3.23
c.f.s. absolute water right was made absofute
by decree entered June 17, 1985 in Consoli-
altea Cases No. 82CW90, 92cw116, 82CW124 and
82CW324.
4.53 c.f.s. absolutely decreed and 0.81 c.f.s.
conditionally decreed to the Gore Creek Intake
for Booth Creek Treatrnent Plant, out of Gore
Creek, with adjudication date of December 31,
!973, and appropriation date of Decernber 19'
L973, Case tto. t{-2157, 1981 Basin Rank 5075-
Point of diversion: on the right bank of Gore
Creek in the SEL/4 sEL/4 of Section 3, Town-
ship 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th P.M. 'at i point whence -the Southeast corner of Eaid
Section 3 bears South 21o30r East, 970 feet-
1.51 c.f.s. conditionally decreed to Gore
Creek Intake for Booth Creek Treatment Plant,
First Enlargement out of Gore Cteek, with-
adjudication aate of Decenber 3l', 1979, and
appropriation date of Decenber 19, L973' Case
N;-. w-szso Point of diversion: same as in
Paragraph II. l8 above.
0.09 c.f.s. conditionally decreed to Log Chute
Pr.unp Station, out of Mill Creek, a tributa-ry
of -Gore Creek, with adjudication date of
Decenber 31, L973, and appropriation date of
Decenber 19, 1973, Case No. W-2157, 1981 Basin
Rank 6075. Point of diversion: on the South
bank of lrtill Creek in Section 15, Township 5
South, Range 80 West of the 6th P'I., .aq a -point uhencL the Northwest corner of section 8
Lears North 4go].st West 10,250 feet.
1.?8 c.f.s conditionally decreed to Nurnber 245
Pumphouse and Pond, out of llitl Creek, a
L
2L.
A-17
c""" lrle 2*t32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(
22.
tributary to Gore Creek, with adjudication
date of becember 31., L973, and appropriation
date of Decernber 19, 1973, Case No. W-2767,
1981 Basin Ranh 6075. Point of diversi'on: on
the East bank of Mill Creek in Sectio\ t7,
Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6tlt
P.M., at a point vthence the Northwest corner
of iection-8 bears North 3lo27r l{est,
6,350 feet.
0.013 c.f.s. absolutely and 0.155 c.f.s.
conditionally decreed €o Plow Spring,- out..of
Mill Creek, -a tributary to Gore Creek, with
adjudication date of D-ecember 31 , 1973, and
aplropriation date of December 19, 1973, Cas-e
nb. wlzfgz, 1981 Basin Rank 6075. Point of
diversion:' on the South bank of MiIl Creek'
Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of
the 6th P.M., at a-point nhence the Northwest
corner of Section g-bears North 50038r West,
10.500 feet. 0.013 c.f.s. was converted to
absolute status in the decree entered on
June 17, 1985 in Consolidated Cases
No. 82Cw90, 82CW115, eZCWl24 and 82CW324.
12.0 c.f.s. conditionally decreed to the Gore
Vatley water Authority committee lfater system
out o-f Bed Sandstone Creek, Black Gore Creek'
and Bighorn Creek, all tributary to-.Gore
Creek. ind out of Gore Creek, with adjudic.a-
tion bate of December 30, 1977 and appropria-
tion date of October 15, L977 ' Case
No. tr-3665, 1981'Basin Rank 5589- Points of
diversion:
a. Diversion Point A (also known as Red
Sandstone Gallery) is located on Red
Sandstone Creek iri Section 1, Township 5
Souttt, Range 81 tlest of the 5th P.ltl' at a
poinl'whenie the Southeast corner of said -Section 1 bears South OT'44r East'
1,370.1 feet-
b. Diversion Point B (a1so known aE E.C.D'C'
Gallerv and Blacli Gore Infiltralion
ciii.til is I'ocated on Black Gore creek
at a point whence the.West guarter corner
of seltion 18, Township 5 south, Range-7g
lrest of tlre 6th P.M. bears Soutb 5to27l
lfest a distance of 1,264 feet.
(
23.
t
A-18
(
c""" wO82cw32s VaiI Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
c. Diversion Point c (also known as Bighorn Pipeline) is located on Bighorn Creek at a point whence the Northnest corDer of
Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 80
West of the 5th P.M. bears North 61004'lfest, 2,737.66 feet.
d. Diversion Point D is located on Gore
Creek at a point whence the Northwest
corner of Section 12, Township 5 South,
Range 80 West of the 6th P.M. bears North
37030' itest 4,500 feet. This point of
diversion wilt not be used and is hereby
abandoned.
0.18 c.f.s. decreed to Vail Water and Sanita-tion District tfell No. 1, out of Gore Creek
alfuvium, with adjudication date of May 31,
1972 and appropriation date of October 7,
t963, Civil Action L529, 1981 Basin Rank 5060.
Point of diversion: at a point lthence the sw
corner of the \IEI/A !nfl/4, Section 8, Town-
ship 5 South, Range 80 West, 5th P.It!. bears
South 84o38r11r West, Z,7Lg feet.
0.2 c.f.s. decreed to Vail water and Sanita-tion District Wel.l No. 2, out of the Gore
Creek alfuvium, with adjudication date of
I|:ay 31 , 1972 and appropriation date of Oct-
ober 1, 1963, civil Action L529, 1981 Basin
Rank 5059. Point of diversion: at a point
whence the sw corner of the Nw1,/4 t{vll/4 of
Section 8, Township 5 south, Range 80 Vfest,
5th P.M. bears South 82o34'20f' West, ?63 feet.
0.176 c.f.s. decreed to Vail water and Sani-
tation District ttelf No. 1, out of the Gore
Creek alluvium, with adjudication date of
December 31, 1973 and appropriation date of
october 7, 1963, case No. wa2l57, 1981 Basin
Rank 5943. Point of diversion: located in
the t{l{1/4 NEL/4, Section 8, Township 5 South,
Range 80 West, 6th P.M. at a point whence the
sW iorner of the lMf,/4 l{l^tll4 of said Section 8
bears South 84038r1lrr West, 2,7I9 feet.
0.198 c.f.s. decreed to Vail vlater and Sani-
tation District welL No. 2, out of tlre Gore
creek afluvium. with adjudication date of
December 31, 1973 and appropriation date of
(
24.
25.
26.
t
27.
A-19
$lii {1,:i'H3:., idated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
(
(
28.
29,
30.
October 1, 1963, Case No. v1-2I67, 1981 Basin
Rank 5942. Point of. diversion: in the Nrl]-/4 llwl/4 of Section B, Township 5 South, Range 80 l{est, 5th P.}1. at a point whence the SW corner of the Nt/+ N.it/4 of said Section 8 bears
South 82"34120rt West, 763 feet.
1.0 c.f.s. decreed to Vail Water and Sanita-tion District Spring and Pipeline-A out of
Gore Creek, with adjudication date of May 31,
L972, and appropriation date of October 10,
L962, Civil Action 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5055.
Point of diversion: at a point whence the l{W corner of, Section 7, Township 5 South,
Range 80 lJest, 6th P.ltl. bears North 55018r30r'
West, 7,045.1 feet.
0.31 c.f.s. decreed to Vail vlater and Sanita-tion District Spring and Pipeline-B, out of
core creek, with adjudication date of May 31,
1972, and appropriation date of October 10,
L962, Civi] Action No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank 5056. Point of diversion: at a point whence
the t{W corner of Section 7, Township 5 South,
Range 80 West, 6th P.tl. bears North 51"13r
West, 7,176.7 feet.
0.31 c.f.s. decreed to Vail water and sanita-tion District Spring and Pipeline-C, out of
core Creek, with adjudication date of May 31,
t972, and appropriation date of October 10,
1962, Civil Action No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank
5056. Point of diversion: at a point whence
the l{W corner of Section 7. Township 5 Sout}r,
Range 80 West, 6th P.tft. bears North 60o13t
West, 7,742,2 feet.
III. Decreed Storage Riqhts:
1. O.OLO4Z acre ft. decreed to the Flening
Storage Tank out of Sandstone Creek, a trj.bu-
tary of Gore Creek, with adjudication of
May-31 , t972, and appropriation d?t9 of
october 9, 1942, Civil Action No. 1529, 1981
Basin nani soaz. Point of diversion: a Point
whence the East guarter corner of Section 1,
Township 5 South. Range 81 West of the 6th
P.M., blars South 29"19 r30'r East a distance of
1,324.28 feet.L
A-20
(
$:ii t:3'I333.'idated
vlater District
tdater Division No. 5
E.c.D.c. Reservoir, conditionally decreed
]']-2.O AF out of Black Gore creek' a tributaly
of Gore Creek, with adjudication date of
May 31 , Lg72 and with appropriation date of
ila! 30, 1966, Civil Action No. 1529, 1981
ga-sin Rank 5084. The initial point of su:rrey
of the high water line: at a point whence the
Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 5
South, Range 80 West of the 5th P.U- bears
North l7o45r west, 5,75L feet.
Iloyt Reserrroir, conditionally decreed 240.25
AF- out of Black Gore Creek, a tributary of
Gore creek, with adjudication date of May 31,
1972 and with appropriation date of May 30,-
1966, Civil Acti-on No. 1529, 1981 Basin Rank
5084. The initial point of survey of the high
water line: at a point of whence the North-
east corner of Section 13, Township 5 South,
Range 80 West, 6th P.M. bears Nortlr 24"431
liest, 13,011 feet.
K.A.c. Resenroir, conditionally decreed
75.0 AF out of Gore Creek, with adjudication
date of December 2?, L977 and appropriation
date of September 2, 1977' Case No. W-3603.
Dan located in the SE1l4 of the sEI/4, sec-
tion 12, Township 5 South, Range 80 west of
the 6th P.!1. Th-e reservoir outlet is located
at a point whence the Southeast corner of said
Section 12 bears South 55o00f East,
1,100 feet.
,lltill Creek Reservoir No. 1, conditionalLy
decreed 1OO.O AF out of Mill Creek, a tribu-
iary of core creek, with adjud.ication date of
Decinber 27, Lg77 and appropriation date of
September 2', !977, case llo. w-ge-04, 1981 Qasln nairf eSgS. The initial point of eu:rrey of the
higher nater line is located at a point whence
th6 forthvrest Corner of Section 10, Township 5
South, Range 80 Vlest of ttre 6tb P-It!. bears
North 15oOOr l{est, 6'500 feet.
llill Creek Resel:voir No. 2, conditional-lY
d.iie"O 190.0 AF out of MitI Creek, a tribu--
iary of Gore creek, uith adjudication date of
Sepiember 2, L977 a4d wlth appropriati-on -d-ates of- SeptemUet 2, L972, Case No. ht-3605, 1981
Basin-Rank 6585. The initial point of suwey
2.
3.
4.
(
5.
6.
t
A-21
c.". rO 8zcvt32g Vail Valley Consolidated
l{ater District
water Division No. 5
(
7.
of the high water line of the reservoir is
located at a point whence the Northwest corner
of Section I0, Township 5 South, Range 80 west
of the 5th P.tl . bears North 28"00r West,
7,800 feet.
Golf Course Reservoir No. 1, decreed 5.5 AF
out of Gore Creek, with adjudication date of
December 12, 1977 and with appropriation date
of Septenber 2, L977, Case No. 1{-3606. Entire
decrel made absolute in case No. 81cw282. The
dam is located in the NEL/4 of the ltWl/4 of
Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of
the 5th P.M. The reservoir outlet is located
at a point whence the Northwest corner of said
Secti-on 9 bears North 69000' West, 1,900 feet.
Golf Course Reservoir No. 2, decreed 25.0 AF
out of Gore Creek, with adjudication date of
December 27, 1977 and with appropriation date
of Septenber 2, ]-977, Case No- l{-3507. Entire
decrei nade absolute in Case No. 81cw282. The
darn is located in SwL/4 of swl/4 of Section 3,
s1t/4 of SEL/4 of Section 4, NEl/4 of NE1/4 of
seciion 9, ind Nw1/a of Nwl/4 of Section 10,
all in Township 5 South, Range 80 tlest of the
6th P.Itt. The ieservoir outlet is located at a
point whence the Northeast corner of said -section 9 bears North 38030r East, 100 feet.
Red Sandstone Reservoir, conditionally decreed
160.0 AF out of Red Sandstone Creek, a tribu-
iary of Gore Cre'ek, with adjudic.ation date of
Dec6mber 30, L977 and appropriation date of
October 15, 1977, Case No- w'3667' 1981' Ba-sin
Rank 5589. The westerly end of the darn is
located in Section 1, Township 5 South'
Ranoe 81 West of the 6th P.lll. at a point
wheice the Southeast cotner of said Section 1
bears South 13625'30il East, 1,810.2 feet.
Black Gore creek Reservoir No. l, condition-
iffv a""reed 112.0 AF out of Black Gore Creek,
i-t'riUutary of Gore Creek, with adjudication
date of Ddcernber 29, 1978 and appropriatlon
date of December 20, 1978, Case No' Vl-40o3,
igCi sisin Bank 6702. The east end of the dan
is-iocated at a point South l7o45r East, 5,761
i.ei from the Northeast corner of Section 13,
8.
(
9.
10.
(
A-22
;:ii *.33'8333.'idated
Water District water Division No. 5
(
(
11.
Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th
P.!1.
Black Gore Creek Resenroir No. 2, condition-
a1ly decreed 116.0 AF out of Black Gore Creek,with adjudication date of December 29, L978
and appropriation date of December 20, 19?8,
Case No. W-4003. 1981 Basin Rank 6702. The
east end of the dam is located at a point
South 22oL0t East, 11,340 feet fron the
Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 5
South, Range 80 West of the 6th P.Ii'!.
Black Gore Creek Reservoir No. 3, condi-tionally decreed 241.0 AF out of Black Gore
Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek, with adju-
dication date of December 29, l97g and appro-priation date of Decenber 20, L978, Case
No. W-4003, 1981 Basin Rank 6702. The North
end of the dam is located at point South
84"30r East, 10,400 feet from the Northeast corner of Section 1, ?ownship 6 South,
Range 80 West of the 6th P.liJ.
Indian Creek Resenroir, conditionally decreed
598.0 AF out of Indian Creek, tributary to Red
Sandstone Creek, a tributary of Gore Creek,with adjudication date of December 29, 1978
and appropriation date of Decernber 2Q, 1978,
Case No. w-4003, 1981 Basin Rank 6702. The
t{est end of the dam is located at a point
North 34o40r West, 14,500 feet fron the
Northeast corner. of Section 1, Township 5
South, Range 81 West of the 6th P.l,l.
Red Sandstone Resenroir No. 2, conditionally
decreed 50.0 AF out of Indian Creek and Red
Sandstone Creek. a tributary of Gore Creek,with adjudication date of December 29, 1978
and with appropriation date of Decenber 20,
t978, Case No. Vt-4003, 1981 Basin Rank 6702.
The west end of the dam is located at a point
North l5o15r West, 7,29O feet from the North-
east corner of Section 1, Township 5 South,
Range 81 ldest of the 6th P.I{.
Black Lake, conditionally decreed 100 AF out
of Black Gore Creek, with adjudication date of
November 12, L982 and appropriation date of
December 20, l97g' Case No. W-4003. The west
L2.
13.
L4.
t
15.
A-23
(
$:ii f, 33'8333., idated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
end of the dam forming Black Lake is located
at a point approximately 17 '42A feet South
59035t East of the NortheaEt corner of
Section 1, Township 6 South, Range 80 West of
the 6th P.M.
16. Black Lake No.2 conditionally decreed
113.6 AF out of Black Gore Creeli with adjudi-
cation date of Novembet L2, L982 and appro-
priation date of December 20' 1978; -Case ilo. W-4003. The west end of the dam forming
BLack Lake No. 2 is located at a point aPprox-
imately 15,160 feet South 66035' East of tbe
Northelst corner of Section 1, Township 5
South, Range 80 l{est of the 5th P.I'l'
l?. Black take No. 2. First Enlargernent, condi-
tionally decreed 278 AF out of Black Gore
Creek witn aajudication date of Novenber 12,
1982 and appropriation date of Decenber 20,
1978; case'iio. eoOs. It is proposed to extend
tbe dam described in paragraph 16 above
80 feet South and 100 feet North to create
Black Lake No. 2, First Enlargenent.
18. Vail Val]ey Reservoir' a proPosed 5,500 AF
reservoir wtricfr will be constructed in the
drainage basin of Red Sandstone Creek with
point -of impoundnent of water located in -section 35, township 4 South, Range 81 west of
the 5th P.lr!. at a point whence the South 1/16
corner, a Bureau oi Land Management aluminum
caP, comnon to Spction 5 of Town-ship 5. South,
nairie 8o West of -the 5th P.!1. and Section 1 of
rowiship 5 South, Range 81 west of the 6th
P.M. beirs South 19006-135r' East, a distance of
7,4OO.29 feet. A decree was entered in Case
No. 81CW353 on llarch 4, 19S5 awarding an
appropriate date of October 29, 1981'
IV. Undecreed Water Storaqe Rights gtd Structures:
1. Vail Valley Reservoir No. 2 proposeq 1,000 AF
reservoir -wtricfr will be constructed in the
Arainage-of Black Gore Creek within 0'75 uriles
of the confluence of Black Gore Creek'and
Miller Creek, which confluence is located,
approxirnately, at 1 pgint - sgulh 31" East'
f-S,roo feet-irom the- Northeast corner of
(
t
A-24
(
c""" n? 82cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
Section 13, Township 5 South. Range 80 West of
the 5th P.M.
StructuEes To Ee Aqgnnented:
1. B1ack Gore Infiltration Ga]lery (E.c.Dj!.-
eorurfittee witer Svstem Point B).
rn whence the
vIL/4 corner of Section 18, Tovrnship 5
South, Range 79 west, 6th P.!'1. bears
South 6l-a?l t west, l'264 feet-b. Maxinum Diversion: 3.0 c.f.s.c. Source: Bfack Gore Creek d. Use: All municiPal PurPoses e. Associated lrlater Rights*:(i) o.25 c.f.s. E.c.D.c. Gallery,
Subsection II.7 above.(ii) 3.0 c.f.s. Hoyt Pipeline Subsection II.8 above, per Case No. 82CVi328.(iii) L2.O c.f.s. Gore Creek Water Author-ity Committee Water Systen Point B,
Subsection II.23 above.
2. Biqhorn,/Gore vallev Pumphouse:of Section lS,
Township 5 south, Range 79 west, 6th P-l'l .
at a point 1.250 feet from tbe North
Section line and 1,100 feet from the ttrest
Section line.b. Irlaximun Diversion: 4-0 c.f.s.
c. source: Gorc Creek d. Use: All municiPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:
10. o c. f . s. conditional lllain Gore
Irtunicipal Ditch and PiPeline,
SubEection II.10 above, decreed in
Case No. 82evl42 on llarch 6, 1985.
3. Gore Creek Intake for Booth Creek Treatnent
Plant:ETlocation: See Subsection II.18 above.
b. Maxinum Diversion: 15 c.f.s.
c. Source: Gore Creek
d. Use: A1l municiPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) 4.63 c.f.s. absolute and 0.81 c.f.s.
conditional , Subsection II.18 above'
(ii) 1.51 c.f.s. conditional First
Enlargenent, Subsection I I . L9 a'bove '
v.
(
t
A-25
(
c"". Nl szcw3zs Vail ValleY Consolidated
water District
water Division No. 5
(iii) Nunetous municipal rights Per 793wt24. See Table 1 below.
Booth Creek Water Treatment Plelt Inlele:
e.
b. Maximum Diversion: 15 c.f.s.c. Source: Booth Creek d. Use: A11 municiPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) 3.23 c.f.s. abiolute and 2.57 c'f's'
conditional , Subsection II.17 above.(ii) Numerous nunicipal rights Per 79cwl24. See Tab1e 1 below.
5. Vail-ValleY ClnEolidated Well- No. Rl:
a. r,ocatro@tion 3,
Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th P't{'at a point approximalely I,-09,5 f-e-et from the sbuth sCCtion line and 1.256 feet
fron the East section line.b. Maximun Diversion: 2.0 c.f.s.c. Source: Gore Creek alluvium d. Use: A11 rnuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated water Rights*: Numerous
nuniciPal rights Per 79Cw724. See
Table 1 below.
Vaflev Consolidated Well Iq. nZ:tion 3,
4.
(
6.Vail
a.
(
Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 5th P.!l'
at a p6int approximately 900 feet from
the S6uth $ection line and 2'365 feet
fron the wbst Section line of said
Section 3.b. Maximun Diversion: 2-5 c.f-s.
c. source: Gore Creeh Alluvium
d. Use: A11 municiPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) 2.5 c.f.s. of Hoyt Pipeline, Strb-
section II.8 above, alternate point
of diversion decreed under case
No. 82CW281.(ii) Case No. 83Cw258 decreed this well
as an alternate Point of diversion
for the following rights: '1'6
c.f.s. of, Bighorn PiPeline, Sub- -section II.9 -above, O.25 c.f .s. of
E.C.D.c. Gallery, Subsection II '7
above . 2-59 c.f .s. of Bootlt Creek
areatnent Pl'ant Intake,
A-26
(
7.Vait Vallev Consolidated Vlell No. R3:
case NP82cw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Vlater District t{ater Division No. 5
Subsection II.17 above. 4.53 c.f.s.
of Gore Creek lDtake for Booth Creek
water Treatnent Plant, Subsec-
tion II.18, above.
2,080 feet.
Uaxinun diversion: 2-0 c.f.s.
Source: Gore Creek Alluvium
Use AII nuniciPal PurPoses
Associated water rights*: Sane as Well
No. R3, Subsection V.7 above.
Vallev Consofidated WelL Nc. R5:
eq "i+iq ioo-foot radiui from a point on the right
bank of Gore Creek nhence the NVI corner
of Section lo. Township 5 South, Range 80
West, 6tlt P.M. bears North 77o30r llest'
800 feet.
(
ed within
100-foot radiui from a point on the right
bank of Gore Creek whence the NE corner
of Section 8, Township 5 South' Range 80
West, 6th P.M. bears North 50030' East.
2,680 feet.b. Maximun Diversiont 2.0 c.f-s-c. Source: Gore Creek Alluvium d. Use: All municiPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) 0.478 c.f,.s. collectively decreed to
VaiI Vil]age West Wells No. 3, 4, 5,
subsectioni rt. 3-5 above, Per this
application.(ii) a-.154 c.f.s. collectively decreed to vail t{ater and Sanitation Distrlct
t'lells No. L and 2, Subsections II.
24-2? above, Per tbis aPPlication.(iii) 1.62 c.f.s. collectively decreed. to Vail t'rater and Sanitation District
Spring and PiPelines A, B, and c,
Subsections II. 28-30 above, Per this aPP1ication.
8. vail valleY CoLsglidate{ w,ell No. R4:a. f,ocatr ed within
100-foot radiui from a point on the right
bank of Gore creek whence the NW corner of Section 9, TownshiP 5 South, Range
80 t{est, 5th P.}t. bears North 73o l{est'
b.
c.
d.
e.
9.
(
VaiI
A-27
case O szcw32s Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
water Division No. 5 r \
b. lrlaximum Diversionz 2.0 c.f.s.c. source: Gore Creek Alluvium d. Use: AII nuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*: Same as Well
No. R3, Subsection V.7 above
10. Vail Vallev Consol.idated well No. R6:
ed within
l0o-foot radiui fron a point on the right
bank of Gore Creek whence the SW corner
of Section 3, Township 5 South, Range 80 l{est, 6th P.}t. bears South 59010r West,
2,530 feet.b. ltaximun Diversion: 2.0 c. f . s.c. source: Gore Creek Alluvium d. Use: AII nuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*: Sarne as l{ell
No. R3, Subsection V.7 above.
11. Vail GoIf Course Ditch.
@of diversion located on
Gore Creek -in the SWL/4 of Section 3,
Township 5 South, Range 80 West' 6th P.Itl- |
f t 9 noint within 200 feet of a point I t 3lu':,;t H:Y"::?'?,?'ff"'n :ff'3::.lll"]ine of said Section 3 -b. tlaximum Diversion: 3.0 c.f.s.c. Source: Gore Creek d. Use: Irrigation e. Associated Water Rights: Nunerous
municipal $tater rights Der 79CwL24- See
Table 1 below.
12. Gore Creek water Treaqnent.?lant-I9gak9:
a. ---EoEEti-on: See Subsectlon I I .15 aDove.
b. llaximun Diversion: 15 c.f.s.
c. Source: Gore Creek
d. Use: Al1 nuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) 1.90 c-f.s. absol'ute
Subsection II.15 above.(ii) Numerous municipal rights per
79CllI24. See Tab]e 1 below.
13. Gotden Pgk Snownaki+o.:@section rr.16 above.
b. Uaximum Diversion: 1.34'c.f.s.
c. Source: Mill Creek
(\
A-28
(
c""u Hle zcw3zl Vail Va]ley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
ffion II.6 above.
Uaximum Diversion: 0.55 c.f.s.source: Gore Creek alluviun Use: AII nrunicipal PurPoses Associated Water Rights*:
0.55 c.f.s., Subsection II.5 above.
d. Use: Snowmaking e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) L.34 c.f.s., Subsection II-15 above.
( ii ) Nurnerous rnunicipal rights per
79CWL24. See Table 1 below.
]1. Vail Villaqe vlest Wef I No. l:a. Location: See Subsectron II.]' aDove.
b. Maximurn Diversion: 0.256 c.f.s.
c. source: Gore Creek alluvium d. Use: A11 municiPal PurPoses e. Associated water Rights*:
0.256 c.f.s., Subsection II.1 above.
(
15.Vail
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
16.Vail
t7.Vail
a.ffitre NE1,z4 sw1,/4 of
section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81
west, 5th P.14. at a point 3,035 feet from the North Section fine and 1,436 feet
frorn the west section line.b. Maxinum Diversion: 0.556 c.f.s.c. Source: Gore Creek alluviun d. Use: All nuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:
0.556 c.f.s. as alternate Point of
diversion for Vail Village West
Wells Nos. 1-5, Subsections II.l.-6
above, Per case No. W-2564-78.
Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81
lrfest, 5th P.M. at a point 3,A44 feet from
the North Section line and 1,750 feet
from the West Section line.b. Irlaxinun Diversionz 0.267 c-f.s.c. sourcei Gore Creek alluviun d. Use: All nuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:,
0.267 c.f.s as-an alternate point of
diversion for Vail Village tfest
a.ffiem1,z4 sttll/4of
t
A-29
(
t
case xl82cw328 VaiI Valley consolidated llater District llater Division No. 5
Wells Nos. 1-5, Sections II.1-6
above, per Case No. W-2664-78.
Vail Internountain Well No. 2:SvtI/4 of Sec-
tion 14, ?ownship 5 South' Range 81 west,
6th P.lu. at a point 1,42a feet fron the
South Section iine and 190 feet fron the
ttest Section line of said Section 14.
18.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Itlaxirnum Diversion: 0.2 e. f . s source: Gore Creek alluvium Use: All municipal PurPoses Associated l{ater Rights*:0.2 c.f.s. as an alternate Point of
diversion per case No. ll-1970 of
0.5 c.f .s. -of the Ruder No. 2 Ditch,
decreed a total of L.26 c.f.s. out of Gore Creek, PrioritY No. 389,with an adjudication date of octo-
ber 3, L936 and aPProPriation date of June 1, 1900, Civil Action
No. 963, 1981 Basin Rank 2757.
(19.Vail Intermountain 9Je11 No. 4 also known as
n the SEL/4 Wtt/4 of Sec-
20.
tion 14, TownshiP 5 South, Range 81 West,
6th P.M. at a point 2'7OO feet from the
North section line and 1,750 feet frorn
the West Section line.
b. tltaximum Diversion: 0.5 c.f.s.
c. Source: Goge Creek alluvium
d. User All nuniciPal PurPoses e. Associated water Rights*:
0.5 c.f's. as an alternate Point of,
diversion Per Case No. 79Cw220 for
0.5 c.f.s.-of the Ruder No. 2 Ditch'
decreed a total of l-26 c.f.s. out
of Gore Creek, Priority No. 389'
with adjudication date of October 3,
1936 and aPProPriation date of
June 1, 1900. civil Action No. 963,
1981 Basin Rank 2757.
Tourist Tr?P SDrinq:a. Locatton: SG subsection II.13 above.
b. Maxirnum Diversion: 0. 133 c- f,. B -
c. source: Gore Creek alluviun.
d. Use: AIl municiPal PurPoses t
A-30
(
;:ii $;$T:i:",idated
water District
Water Division No. 5
e. Associated water Rights*:(i) 0.133 c.f.s., Subsection II.13
above.(ii) Numerous municipal rights per
79CWL24. See Table 1 below.
Town of Vail Sprins Taps:ffiection rr.14 above.
b. llaxinum Diversion: 0.78 c.f.s.c. Source: Gore Creek alfuviultt.d. Use: A11 municipal purPoses
e. Associated Water Rights*:(i) 0.78 c.f.s, Subsection II.14 above.(ii) Numerous rnunicipal rights per
79CWI24. See Ta.ble 1 below.
Loq Chute Purnp Station:ffisection rl.2o above.b. Maxinum Diversion: 0.09 c.f.s-
c. Sourcer MiIl Creek d. Use: A11 municipal PurPoses e. Associ.ated Water Rights*r (i) 0.09 c.f.s, Subsection.II.20 above.(ii I Nunerous nrunicipal rights per
79CW124. See Table I below.
Nunber 245 Punphouse and Pond:II.21 above.
b. I'laxinum Diversion: 1.78 c.f.s.
c. Source: MiI} Creek
d. Use: A11 municiPal PurPoses e. Associated lrater Rights*:(i) 1.78 c.'f .s., conditional, Subsec-tion II.21 above'(ii1 Nunerous rnunicipal rights per
79CVll24. See Table 1 below.
(
2L.
22.
23.
24.Plow Sprins:El---GEon: see subsection 11.22 b. tlaxinrr:rn Diversion: 0.178 c.f.s-c. Source: ltlill. Creek d. Use: A1l. municiPal PurPoses e. Associated Water Rights*:
above.
0. 165 (i) 0.013 c.f.s., absolute and c.f.s., conditional ,
Subsection lI.22 above.
( ii ) Nunerous nunicipal rig-hts Per 79gttl24. See ?able '1 below.
t
A-31
"""" olr 2cw328 Vail Val,ley Consolidated
water District
Water Pivision No. 5
(
25' X?" i:::ii:*:= ?f"sr?t?"ah ?i'E':'*+"3,1't?'"
lt., 6th P.M. at a Point located as
foilows: Commencing-at the NW corner of
said Section 7' thence South 1018' East,
a distance of 843 feet-b. Maximum Diversionz 4.5 c'f's'
c. Source: Gore Creek
d. Use: Snowmaking e. Associated Water Rights*:
4.5 c.f.s. of HoYt PiPeline, -Subsection II.8. above, Per thls
application.
*The itassociated water rights" schedufed in this subsection
aie-runicipal water righti associated with these structures.
itrese strultures -iie aiso capable of being augimented Pfi th"
Eo"""rpti.,r. use Jvailable td tfre irrigation water rights
described in section I- above.
(
(
\
A-32
(
Case No. 82Cw328 Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District
Water Division No. 5
TASLE 1
rights divertible at alternate points of
cases No. 79CW124 and w-2256 by priority.
Amount (c.f .s. )
. 0.32
2.50
2.25
4.O4
0.59 . 0.59
1.33
0.25
1 .50
1.00 J.40
f 1.00 \ 4.40
0.50
I .00
2.O0
2.OO
0.0892
0.01042 AF
o.25
Water
diversion under
Case No. 79cwl24
1.0.00
1 .60
4. 00
10.00
112.00
240.25
2.22
**Webb Ditch **Mcl'lonag1e Ditch **Bryant Lower Ditch **Buffehr & Rose Ditch **Rose Ditch **Rose Ditch **Rose Ditch **Bryant Lower Ditch
't*Kiahtipes No. 1 Ditch
't*Kiahtipes No. 2 Ditch *'tXiahtipes No. 3 Ditch ,t*Kiahtipes No. 6 Ditch **Black Gore Ditch **Webb Ditch **Main Gore Ditch *rtEdward Ditch **Mike Ditch *Fleming Spring and
Pipeline
Fleninq Storage Tank *E.C.D.C. Gallery (Black Gore Infiltra-tion Gallery,
GWACWS Pt.B)*Eoyt Pipeline *Bighorn Pipeline
(GWACVTS Pr. C)*Bighorn Fish Pond Ditch *Main Gore !!un. Ditch
and Pipeline
E.C.D.C. Resenroir
Hoyt Resenroir *Red Sandstone Gallery
(G\ndAcr{s Pt. A)
1981
Basin
Rank Name
847
1666
1967
2774
2779
2784
2784
2S2t
3299
3299
3299
3299
3306
3307
4183
4442
4443
5047
5047
AF
AF
5057
5057
5057
5057
5057
5084
5084
5273
(
A-33
-
C
c"". rl Bzcw3zl VaiI Valley Consolidated
Water District water Division No. 5
1981
Basin
Rank
Case No. W-2256
Anount (c.f .s. )
2 .00
1 .28
2 .30
1.20
2.40 l.2a
L.20
0.50
0.80
0.50
2.80
3 .30
2.00
2.02
3.00
1.00
2.70
6.20
4.2A
Name
**Mann Ditch **Webb Ditch **Larzalere Ditch **F. Larzalere Ditch **Scovill.e Ditch **Sawmill. Ditch **Shively Ditch **Sandstone Ditch *rPark Ditch **spraddle Ditch **Xatsos Ditch **Katsos No. 2 Ditch **Spraddle No. 2 Ditch **Vfebb Ditch **Sawmill Ditch **F. Larzalere Ditch **Sandstone Ditch **Larzal.ere Ditch **!Iann Ditch
735
8.47
850
851
853
854
854
2358
2359
2360
3299
3299
3300
3307
3444
3634
3836
3903
4185
(*These water rights were decreed in case No. 79Cwl24 to alternate points of diversion at t}re following struc-tures: Booth Creek l{ater lreatrnent Plant fntake, Gore
Creek Intake for Booth Creek water Treatment Plant, Vail
Valley Consolidated Well No. Rl, Vail Golf Course Ditch,
core Creek t{ater Treatment Plant Intake, Golden Peak
Snowrnaking, Tourist Trap Spring, Town of Vail SPring
Taps, tog Chute Pump Station, Nuriber 245 Pumphouse and
Pond, and PIow Spring. the E.C.D.C. Ga1lery, Eoyt Pipeline, and Bighorn Fish Pond Ditch water rights nay
continue to be diverted at their original points of
diversion and the above listed points of diversion pursuant to the decree entered herein. The Flenring.
spring and Pipeline, Bighorn Pipeline, Uain Gore Uunici-pal Ditch and Pipeline, and Red Sandstone Gallery water rights may eontinue to be diverted at the alternate points of-diversion but not at their original points of
diversion pursuant to Paragraph 5 of this decree.
**So.Iong as this decree is effective, the applicant will
use th6se ltater rights only as consumptivC use credits to be diverted and- stored as describe-d in Paragraph 8
herein. If this decree is not in effect for sorne
reason, the Applicant reserves its right to divert rater
as decreed iri-Case No6. 79ca[24 and F-ZZSA or as subse-
quently decreed by a court of competent jurisdiction'
\
A-34
\Cr:r fe-.,-
Clc_..1
7 5 Sortb Frontagc Road
Vtil, Colorado 81657
t 0t -47 9 -2 1 0 t / FAX 1 0 t -47 9 -2 1 t7
Office of tbe Toun Manager
March 25, 1991
Mr. Warren M. Garbe, General Manager
Upper Eagle Valley Consoljdated Sanitat'i on District
and Vai1 Va1ley Consoljdated Water District
846 Forest Road
Vail, C0 81657
Re: Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District
Vai l Val i ey Consol j dated lJater Di stri ct
Town of VaiI - Road Cut Permits and Tap Fee Waivers
Dear Warren:
Since we were both interested in some pending projects which needed to be
resolved a couple of months ago, I beijeve we informed Fred Haslee that the
agreements between the Town and the Sanitation and Water 0istricts were
acceptable and would be executed. S'i nce that time, the agreements have
been fully executed, and two copies are enclosed for your files.
In response to Jim Collins' request jn his letter dated January 30, 1991,
the Town of Vail is happy to waive the street cut permit fees of $1,100 due
from the Vajl Valley District and $250 due from the Upper Eagle Va1 1ey
Consolidated Sanitation District. Pete Burnett will be in touch with Fred
Haslee if any further paperwork or correspondence is necessary to
accomolish this.
I hope that you are getting settled in the val 1ey and in your job, and
would like to get together with you for lunch after the end of ski season.I will give you a call in the next few weeks to get something scheduled.
I would also like to apologize for the length of time it has taken to get
these returned to you, but I am certainly encouraged that the Districts and
the Town of Vail are entering into this type of agreement again and working
closely together. Please Iet me know if have any questions concerning
these agreements. I will be glad to d'i scuss the history with you when we
get together.
Rondall V. Phillips
Town Manager
RVP/sas
Encl os ure
cc: Kristan Pritz
Pete Burnett
Gary Murrai n
Martha Jensen
rl o o I I Cor-r,rxs AlrD Cocrnnl, P.c.
"ou' "..oJ".f arroRNEys ar Law
rfMorHyJ. BEAToN DENVER. coLoRADo eo22a .h*Y
RoBERrG.coLE nl _.r lw- lil)a.
'AULC.RUFIEN January 30, 199i- YlYr,rrrrnm cAMERoNw'wLER l'uYl' W tr-'^*'=;;ffI
v. nn*rip' ffifwr''Town Manager
rown or vail W4 "CO
75 South Frontage Road t--vail, co 8t657
JeneS p. COt Ltt6 39O UNION BOULEVARD. SUITE 4OO
riri
-'!)
TELEPHONE
t3031 986-t551
WATS
{800) 354-5941
TELEFAX
1303) 9e6-t 755
Re: Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District vail valley Consolidated Water District
Town of Vail- - Road cut Permits and Tap Fee Waivers
Dear Ron:
we look forward to knowing of the acceptability of the
agreement among the three entities transrnitted to you December 2L,
1-990, a).ong with $37,700 in reinbursed water and sewer tap perrnits.
Enclosed is a copy of a request from Todd oppenheimer of the
town for additional tap fee waivers. We anticipate a granting of
that request when the contract is ful1y executed.
Finbl{, \tXere\j.4 Ronfflg-q3e<t ion
fees billed by the Town of Vail in cut
from
from
the ofa
JPC;dec
Enclosure
cc: Warren M. Garbe
Nancy D. Glenn
Becky Bultemeier,
Frederick Haslee
of sorne outstanding road the amount of $l-,100 due District and $250.00 due Sanitati-on District. In
we receive consideration
the Vail Va11ey Consolidated Water the Upper Eagle Va11ey Consolidated spirit of overall cooperation, could
waiver of those outstandinq fees?
We look forward to hearing frorn you.
Sincerely,
c. P.A.
NEC'D FEB t 1991
PAUL R. COCKREL
JAT'ES P. COLLINS
TIMOTHY J. BEATON
aEcoDEc 2 71990
ROBERT G. COLE
PAUL C- RUFIEN
CAMERON w' TYLER
Rondall V. Phillips
Town Manager
Torrn of Vail
?5 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado AL657
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3'O UNION EOULEVAFD. SUITE
'OO
DENVER. COLORADO AO22A
December 21 , L99O
TELEPHOI{E
(Eo3t 086-t55t
WATS
taoot 35a-5eal
TELEFAX
1303,0aG-t755
Re: Agreements Among Town of VaiI , Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District and Vail Va11ey
Consolidated Water District
Dear Ron:
Enclosed is the Vail valley Consolidated Water District Tap
Fee Reirnbursement of $23,200; the Upper Eagle valley Consolidated Sanitation Distrl-ct Tap Fee Reirnbursement of $l-4,500t and three original Agreements anong the three Entities executed by the Sanitation District and the Water District -- all pursuant to our discussions of last nonth.
Please let ne knortr if there are any the Torrrn conslder the Agreenents and, if
executed copies to us.
questions. Please have acceptable, return two
Best wishes for the holidav season.
Sincerely,
CoLLINS AND COCKREL, P.C.
Janes P. Collins Attorney for Vail Valley
Consolidated Water District and
Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District
(DTCTATED BUT NOT READ)
JPC: le
Enclosures
ce: Nancy D. Glenn ({enc.)
Beclqr Bulteneier' C.P.A. (w/enc.)Walter Kirch ({enc.)
Ednund H. Drager, Jr., 8sg. (wrlenc.)
a.t"ro*s .o.ND c ocrnn",Q.c.
mfrooEc 2 rpql
AGREEMENT
Anong
TOWN OF VAIL,
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED SANITATION DISTRICT VATL VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WAAER DTSTRICT
THrs TNTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREET{ENT is nade and entered into this day ot , L990, by and betneen the TOWN oF vArL' a colorado nuni-bipat corporation (-trre Town'), the uppER EAGLE VALLEY coNsoLrDATED sANrrATroN DtsrRrcr, a cororado quasi-rnunicipal corporation (/sanitation District') and the vArL vALUEy coNsoLrDATED WATER DrsrRrcr. a colorado quasi-municipal corporation ('Water District').
RSCITALS
L. Tlre Tolrn, the water oistrict and the sanitation District wish to contract together to provide for the waiver of certain fees between the Town and the Districts.
2. This rntergovernraentar Agreement is authorized pursuant to secti.on L8, Articre Xrv of the colorado constitution and'section 29-L-2OL, efi seq., C.R.S.
Now THEREFOFE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,conditions and promi-ses contai-ned herein, the parti_es hereby agrei as follows:
1. The Town sharr waive during the term of this Agreenent,for the water District and sanitatioi District, the folfoiing reei and costs:
A.
B.
c.
D,
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Street cuts.
Recreation arnenities.
Clean up,
Building perrnit.
Electrical pernit.
Mechanical per:mit.
Plunbing pernit.
Design Review Board.
Sign application.
Planning and Environmental
1
Coronission application.
:
2, The Water District and Sanitation District agree to pay the Town's direct expenses t,o third parties for al-l ptan revi6w3 as per section 304(c) of the u.B.c. and will cornply with chapter 3 of the U.B.C. for application for a permit.
3. The water District and sanitation District shalt waive all tap fees for pubric restroorns, park landscaping and drinking fountains on Town of Vail property. These tap teei shall includ6 irrigation tap fees, sewer tap fees and water tap fees.
4. The Town of Vail aglrees to apply to the Water and sanitation Distr.icts for necessary taps and comply with service rine inspections and meter installation. rhe r6wi of vaiL also ag'rees to pay monthly water and sewer servj_ce fees.
5. lermination
Unless sooner terninated as provided for herein, this Agreement sharr be effective January 1, L991 and shall terminate December 31, L993. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision, either party with or without cause rnay t6rrninate t'tris i,ireernent upon the givingr of one hundred eighty irso) days prior riritten notice of such termination to the other respective p-rties. Notice shall be deemed to have been given upon the maj-ling of said notice by united states certified first class rnai1, postage prepaid, and addressed to the parties at the respective addresses as shatl appear herein or upon.a change of address pursuant to this notice provision. rt is the intent of the respective parties that this Agreernent shall be renewed for additional periods following the end. of tne initial period, and unless one of the parties gives notice to the other parties at least one hundred eighty (rB0) days prior to the end of the initial period that such party desiris -to terminate this Agreernent or !o renegotiate the terns, thi.s Agreement sharr be autornatically extended for an additional period of 2 years each not to exceed a total of two (2) such extensions.
6. This Agreernent does not and shalr not be d.eerned to confer upon a grant to any third party any right to claim damages or to bring any lawsuit, action or other procLedings against either the Town or the Districts because of any breech hereof or because of any terrns, covenants, agrreements or conditions contained herein.
7. No rnodification or waiver of this Agreement or of any convening condition or provision herein contaiied shalL be vali-cl unress in writing and duly executed by the party to be charged.
8. This written Agreenent embodies the vrhole Agreernent between the parties and there are no j.nducernents, promise=l t"t ",conditions, or other obrigations rnad.e or entered'irito eith"i ly tt"Town or the Districts other than those contained herein.
L0. The Town has represented to the Districts and likewise,the Districts have represented to the Town that they possess the legal abirity to enter into tlris Agreement. rn the event that a court of coupetent jurisdiction deternines that any of the parties hereto did not possess the regal ability to enter intb this Agreement, this Agreement shall be considefed null- and void as of the date of such court detemination.
IN WfTNESS I|HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first written above.
9. This Agreement parties, their successors anyone vithout ttre prior hereto.
TOWN OF VATL
VALLEY
strall be binding upon the respective or assigns, and nay not be assigned by wrj-tten consent of the other parties
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED
SANT"A?ION DTSTRIC"
By
VAI WATER DISTRICT
L:
v.
CONSOLIDATED
3
[ _r.
li
75 soulh frontage road
vail, colorado 8't657
(3031 4792138
(303) 479-A3e
October 31, 1990
ollice ol community developnant
I
Mr. Jerry Bender
water operations Director
Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation
846 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Landscaping at Vail well, intersection of South Frontage Road
and Aspen Road
Dear Jerry:
Thank you very nuch for reseeding tlre area -at the chlorination
faciltf at the above location. We also appreciate the rrno parking'l
signs.
Ken Hughey, Chlef of Police in Vail , has agreed to ticket violatois, but infotns me that he cannot tow any vehicles, as tlrey
would be on private property. The Police Department can tor
vehicles nhich are on public property. Mr. Hughey will call you
and explain this further to you.
once again, we appreciate your responsiveness on this issue!
Please call ne if you have any further guestions at 479-
2L38.
sincerely,
e6K"/-J BetsY:fRosol-ack :
'Planning Technician
b
UppeR Elcle Vlllev
WATE R AND SANITATION D ISTR ICTS
846 FOREST ROAD ' VAIL, COLORADO 8I557
{30 3) 476 7480
nrC?SEp11p90
September 10, 1990
.r V-^ '/
xn rul- h
Y)Wt l\,hd -y . ^ttA1 t#',',7t <II IIN'u r /)ilu/
lb. I$istan Pritz Y{
Director of Cmrnity Dewloprt
Tcrn of Vail
75 South Frqrtqe Road Vail, Colorado 8155?
Re: Lardscape Seedirg at Vail IGU
Dear lcistan:
Tbe Vail Valley Crcolldated glater District tta6 reseeded the area of
ir{pact at the chJ.orfuntiqr facility for Vail t€Il R1 located at t}te entrance to
Vail Village, 11th Filing, qr Asrpen l-ane, qr three separette occasiors in sqe
areas. After the rct recent reseeding, the District tras instatl.ed "No
Parking" slgns ard narklrg EDsts to assist in ntntnizirg dmage durirg smor
rrencnral .
In orrler to reduce fr:rther datnage caused by urnuthorized parking, the
District wishes to enllst the Tcrnrrs aseistance ln tlcletirg ard rerErring suctr
rrctriclee since the District tras no jurisdictidr in tlris natter.
Your cwtte ard enforcsrt of parkirg restrictisrs r€uld be grreatly
atrpreciated.
Sincerely,
krLJ^^Jerry Berder
Water Operatlqs Di:rector
JB:sk
cc: Ror Phillips
Betsy Rogefach
Ed Drager
o .7
\ ll paRTrcrparruG orsrRrcrs - ARRowHEAD METRo wArER . avoN MErRo wATER . BEAVEFT CREEK METRo rvATEFI . BERR.u cREEK METRo warE. /i;;'\\
a\
EAGLE VA'L MErRo w"""' '"'"'f,;Lll:::::::,;iiffJ:TH:?:l'-H: ;:':ffff;:: "aLLE.. coNsoL'oArED saN'ra'oN
@
UppeR Elelg Vl
WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICTS
845 FOREST FOID . VArL. COL0FA00 81557
i303r 476 7480
066ltrtrdlsl:u
September 10, 1990
lib. lGistan hitz
Director of Cm:rrity Devefognent
Toyn of ValJ.
75 Souttr FrdltagE Road
Vail., Colorado 81657
Re: f,arrilscape Seedirg at Vail Well
Dear lGistarr:
the Vail Valley Crcolidated lbter Diatrict has neseeded the area of iteact at the cilorination facility for Vail I€11 Rl located at the entrance to Vail Village, llth Fllirg, on Aspen Lane, qr tnree separate occasiqts in scre areas. After the nost recent reseedirg, the District has instal.led "No Parkiqg" signs arrt mrking trnsts to assist in rnininizirg danage dqring snor rellorral.
rn orrder to reduce firrtber darEge canrsed by unauthorized parking, the District wishes to enJ,ist ttre Tqln's assistance in ticketirg arrt renovirg srrctr
vetricJ.es since the District has no jr.rrisdiction in this natter.
Your cornents arrc enforcenpnt of parkirg restrictiqts rmuld be gneatly
al4reciated.
Sincerely,
kr /L'c^
Jerry Bemder
I{ater OlErations Director
JB:sk
cc: Ron PhiU.iF6
Betsy Ro6elactt
Ed Dragier
o
LLEY
o
./
l\\ PAttlctpATlN. Drslt rcrs - aRRowHEA' METFo WATER . avoN METRo wA rER . BEAVER cREEK MErRo warER . BERR' :REEK METRo wATER ,4;;\
O\
EAGLE va'L MErRo warER ' ED*""::,:;:,*1)::::;::..'fi:lffl?""x';:fii'^,::;Tff:::""*'" coNsoL'|DA'Eo saN'|ra.oN
@
a
F[[.E COPV
luwn
75 south hontage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 47!r-2138
(303) 47!r-2139
Aug'ust 7, 1990
olfice ol communlty development
Mr. Ed Drager
Eagle vatley Consolidated Water District
846 Forest Road Vail, CO 8L657
RE: Reseeding entrance to Vait Village llth Filing.
Dear Ed:
In May of t-988, the water oistrict asked to build an R well pump
buildlng at the entrance to Vail Village lLth Filing on Aspen
Lane and the South Frontage Road. one condition of approval was
that disturbed areas be revegetated with natural grasses.
ft has become apparent that the site needs to be revegetated.
construction trucks have also parked on the property and have
darnaged the site. The Town of vail vrould like to reguest that
the area be reseeded and rocks be placed along the roadway so
that construction trucks cannot park in the area.
Please let rne know how and when this concern could be addressed.
Thank you for your assistance. Please give rue a caLl at 479-2L38
if you have guestions.
Sincerely,
BR/pp
o
7 Project APPlicatlon
- zr, , ro,,*. sf,t[*e
projectName: \rlr/{i:-"{. },S.Ip,<r ',}.., nA,,''s'+
-i\ . ttA --+-
Contact Person and enone UAJ€- l'1'b1T-
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Filing . Zone
-
l. tl ,t ,-
comments. \ tArt-_ V&:*<.r: llt r1 Y, t-t JC-
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:5rr":if
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Sum mary:
PRAJECT,
DATE SUEMITTED:- DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC WORKS
Reviewed by:
Comments:
0ate
frot tS)* u"'.r, 7
lu, ,'., 't) t '"t.t fio ", /F-
P*^t, fo \^'LF , C8 5
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
POLICE DEPARTMENT
| / ) /t,, -.U"/ f7 l b/,L.J"<P/
/z-\ L l") U7/L//'l
;
6 |l*rn 0 /./ t/// t6Lv,c€S
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
RECREATIoN oEPARTI,,IENT
Reviewed by:
Comnents:
\
Date
)1
.|
*****THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBIIITTED*****
I. PRE.APPLICATION MEETING;
A pre-appljcation meeting with-a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
determihb it any additional information is needed. No application will be accepted
unless it js complete (must include all jtems required by the zoning adm'injstrator).It is the applicint's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additjonal submjtta.l requirements. Please note that a CoMPLETE applica-
tion wi'l I streamline the approval process for your proiect by decreas'ing the number
of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL cond'it'ions of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is issued.
' A. PROJECT DESCRIPTI0N: C1. Iniection Vault fot ve11 R-7
APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DRB IIEETII'IG:
DRB APPLICATION
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Addt"ESS Interstaqs 70-and Aspe! I,ane
Legal Description
te'l ephone
Zon i ng
C. NAME 0F APPLICANT: Vail Va11ey Consolidated Warer District _
AddreSs 846 Forest Road Vai1. Colorado 8f657 telephone 476-7 L8o
D. NAME 0F APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: David Morr. General Manager
\
Addres s same as Aonf icant
E. NAME 0F 0WNERS: Edrnund Draeer. Chairman of the Board (VVCWD)
846 Forest Road. Vai1. CO 816s 7
' Interstate 70 Right-of*Way, west of Mile marker Lot Block - Fjfing #rtg.
tel ephone L7 6-7 Lp,O
S'i gnature
Address
F. DRB FEE: The fee wjl1 be paid at the time a building permit is requested.
VALUATION FEE
$ 0-$ 10,000 $10.00
$10,001 -$ 50,000 $25.00
$5o,oo1 -$ 15o,ooo $so.oo
$150,001 -$ 500,000 $100.00
$500,001 - $1,000,000 $200.00 $ Over $1,000,000 $300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the s'ite
to indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that wjll be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the
si te.
2. The review process for NEI,J EUILDINGS rvill normaliy involve b.ro separate meetings
of the Design Review Board, so,plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. People who fai l to appear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement wilI be required to be
republ i shed.
\
4. The fo] low'ing items no longer have.to be presented to the Desiqn Review Eoard'
ii;;y,-h;;;r"i, niu" io U" p"utunted io the Zoning Administratoi for approval:
a. Windows, sky.l .ights and similar exterior changes that do not a]ter the
existing plane of the building; and
b. Buitding additions that are not viewed floqr lny other lot or pub119:11:.'
which hive had letters submitted from adjo'ining property owners approvlng
the additionl and/or approval from the aient f6r', or manager of a condominium
associ ation.
5. you may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You shou'ld
check with a Town Planner before proceeding.
o
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
NEl.I CONSTRUCTION
A. Topographic map and site plan of site containing
1. Licensed surveyor's stamP.
I I.
5.
7.
cabl e TV
Tel ephone
sewer gas
water e l ectri c
c. Property ljnes showing distances and bearings and a basis of bearing
d. Proposed driveways with percent slope and spot elevations
e. All easements
8. Existing and finished grades.
9. All existing and proposed improvements including structures, landscaped areas,
service areas, storage areas, walks, driveways, off-street parking, loading
areas, retaining wa))s (with spot elevations), and other site improvements.
10. Elevations of top of roof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath) to
determine height of building.
B. A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availabi'lity. To
be submitted with site plan.
C. Prefiminary title report to accompany all submjttals, to insure property ownership
and all easements on property.
D. Landscape Plan (L" = 2O' or larger) - 2 copies
1. Shovl the location of 4" diameter or.iarger trees, other shiubs,-and-iia'iive plants th are on the site and the location and design of proposed landscape area.s wittr- -- -
the varieties and approximate sizes of plant materi als to be planted. I'
2. Complete landscape materjals list.
3. Designate trees to be saved and those to be lost.
N0TE: As much of the above information as possible should occur on the site p1 an, so that
the inter-relation of the various components is clear. The landscape plan should be
separate. The existing topographic and vegetational characteristics may be a separate
map. The applicant must stake the site to show iot lines and building corners. Trees
that will be lost during construction must be tagged. The work should be completed
before the DRB s'ite visit.
o
the foliowing (2 copies):
2. Contour intervals of not more than 2' unless the parcei consists of 6 acres or
more, in which case, 5' contour intervals wi'l I be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4' or more
one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other s'ignificant natural features (large boulders,
intermittent streams, etc. ).
Avalanche areas, 100 year flood plain and slopes 40% or more, if applicable.-
Ties to ex'isting benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert.
Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site showing s'ize and type of
culverts, swales, etc.
b. Exact locations of all utilities to include exist'ing sources and proposed
service lines from sources to the structure. Utilities to include:
' . E. Architecturai Plans (1/8" = l' or larger) 2 copies
. 1. Must include floor plans and all elevations as they will appear on colpletion.
Elevat'ions must show both existing and fjnished grades.
Z. Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be specified and submitted for
review on the materials list avajlable from the Department of Comnrunity 0evelop-
rnenf,. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented at the Design Review
Board meeting'
F. The Zoning Adm'inistrator and/or DRB may require the submjssjon of additional plans'
drawings, specifications, samples and other,material (including a model) if deemed
necessary tb determine whether a project wi1l comply with design guidelines.
II. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photos or sketches that clearly indicate what is proposed and the location (site plan)
of proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requirements given above, as
long as they provide al'l important spec'i fications for the proposed including colors and
materials to be used.
III. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A. Original floor plans with al1 specifications shown
B. Floor plan for addition - 2 copies
C. Site plan show'ing existing and proposed construction - 2 copies topos
D. Elevations of addition
E. Photos of existing structure
F. Specifications for all materials and col-or samples on materials ljst available at
Deparfinent of Cornrnun'i ty Development
At the request of the Design Review Administrator you may also be requ'i red to submit:
G. Statement from each utifity verify'i ng Iocation of service and availability. See
attached utility location verification form.
H. Site improvement survey, stamped by reg'i stered professional surveyor.
I. Preliminary tit'le report, verifying ownership of property and lists of easements.
IV. FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building pernrit has been issued, and when the project is undervay, the following
will be required before any buiiding receives a framing inspect'ion from the Building
Department: A certified jmprovement survey showing:
A. Building locations with tjes to property corners, i.e. distances and angles.
B. Build'i ng dimensions to nearest tenth of foot.
C. AlI utility service lines as-builts showing sjze of lines, type of material used,
and exact locations. 2 copies
0. 0rainage as-builts. 2 copies
E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
F. A1 I property pins are to be e'ither found or set and stated on map.
G. AlI easements
H. Bujlding floor el evations and roof ridge elevations.
\
DATE : 1_3_l-p.dt_t9_B!__
LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N: Lot
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRiCTS
Bl ock Filing
ADDRESS:
OI.lNER Vai l Vel l cy Cnnsol i dal-ed wa ter hi <r ll0ne--Z:O::.agO-Dnn r^^ I'nOne /,-7a aat.^ARCHITECT Bnn, r"c - Phone 4t6-bTt'O
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED
LOT SIZE
USE Lrarer
Hei ght
TotaI GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course
Si te Coverage
Landscapi ng
Fence/Reta'i ning !r'la11 Heights
Parki ng
Credi ts: Garage
Mechan'i cai
Ai rl ock
Storage
So'l ai" Heat
Drive: Slope Permitted
Envi ronmental,/Hazards :
Sl ope
Al I ovred
(30)(33)
20'
15'
15'
(30)(50)
( 3oo ) (600 )
(eoo)(1200)
(50)(ioo)
(25) (50)
(2oo)(4oo)
+tt / foot SloPe Actual
Ava'l anche None
Propos ed
Q=gi__
I q5
195
z-0-'
-
1)Ol
lqq cq ft.
pi el d rO, 000
2
I" / foot
Flood Plain None
307
Wetl ands None
Geologic Hazards None
Comments :
Zon ing: Approved/Di sapproved
Date:
Staff Signature
LIST OF MATERIALS
tn*, oi PR0JECT: R-1 well House
DESCRIPTION OF PR : C1^ f q.jection Vault f;?-Tef 1 Rl
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET AODRESS: I-zo-r-11.w1-- west E-TifE-Ti'i.' +fr-
The follorv'i ng'information is_required for submittal by the applicant to the gesign Review
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR .^tl .l - G{h^"rI {|<ttteST-Roof
Si di ng
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffi ts
Wi ndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
h lasnl ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
None
Rubber Membrane - Flat Black
Concrete Lieht Brown
Galvanized
None
None
Me ta1 Brown
None
N0ne
None
None
None
None
B. LANDSCAPING: Name
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
of Designer:
Phone:
Botanical Name
Nonb
RBD Inc .
416-6340
Common Name Quani ty Si ze*
EXiSTING TREES TO
BE REIqOVED
None
for conifers.
' (over)
Me tal
*Indicate calioer for deciducious trees.Indicate height
. PLANT I'IATERIALS:.. (con't)
cuDr ra<
Botanical Name
Nonp
Common Name Size
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVID
GROUND COVERS
Nen^
Type
NOne
Square Footaqe
s0D
SEED ?O-OOn srl ft.
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining lval'ls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) please specify.
UTILITY LOCAT1ON VERIFICATION
SUB D IVI SION
JOB
LOT
1Ho
BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS I-70 R.0.W. - West of Mile Marker
The location
Lines, must
acconpany ing
of utiLities, whether they
be approved and verified by
be nain trunk
the following
#L7 9
lines or proposeC utilities for the
citp nl rn
Mountain Bel I
1-634-3778
l,lestern Slope Gas
Harry Moyes
Public Service Company
. Gary Hal l
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Va i'l Cabl e T .V .
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Valley Water
and Sanitat'ion 0iscrict
David Krenek
Date
14Lsr
u tv-ft
t/-z y- {B
*For new con:
+/tt/rmlease fill or
atiached shee
+- /J-st
Authori Sionature
dhrvl ,A,74_ \LW
NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his
responsi"bility to obtain a street cut permit fron the
Tor"n of VaiL , Departrnent of Publ ic ltlorks and to obtain
utility locations before digging r.n any public right-
of-way or easenent in the To sn of Vail. .A. building pernrit
is not a street cut pernit. A street cut pernit nust be
obtained sep arately.
This forn is to verify service availablity and location.
This. should be used in conjunction with prepering your
utility plan and scheduling instaLlations.
t
L_l pll L_l --I
trn!
{o
ID m
Iq l-o
t-,, h E l<x f l! :l t lm: 6 l9q ;1 l;: s l$H I 13: e l=e i i5
o.<4o-dE a!l ttO ctt >t 3g mt
'n
T
m
=
3rq m :-_ (-
--o
;i7't-o o z o {F F
c)
o z T m F
=-{
-n!
z=oqt \2
^_r.,z
q)z
=q mt
lr lol 13o l;- o
l'- <
lNn
| 'Tl
il xm
f
-{o
TD m x
m !i
o z
<-o (!g
-{m
c
c_l
(.-,
c.i c:l
n o
-r m
(_
z
IT
I
{
trl r-'
l-
t-m
r
2.\
\.1 V
m
'.l'
z
z --t
o I o
t-
=
m
I
=r
Za
vz.>m oxl --{ >or-7 'Tl
t-z
F a
trt
lz
lr
t=
le"
a i
r.
F
Ul
I -J 5.
l-r
l=lz
lo
l-rl l<t>
lF
lm
lc_,
l6
o f *lg
lo
t;
lF l!lm
P lz lo
I
I
I
l-{
E lz
le
l<t>
lF lrt
lfl lz
l-r to
l€
lz lo
l'r1 I<t>
lF l!tm
F'lz
T
z
{
F
r-l
H c)
H z
l-{
l{
lz
t:t>
t;lm lo f lz lo
I
I l-lH
ll l-
I
\o
F,\o
I +'o\
I
g_
;;f: n
:lqge
Igcn!col.s F
3;]FF
=(/,OYJ -=-.o9,
a*ie;dci3l oti 5 0!i OO",@X
ISaB=369-r;'lag4€
=61._a*EiF r+[\Fgsli
s*t:Egl
iilr f qr ^. ^
r
pA''...i 1i i a
61 3 Fg$=il saae a il *;; ai
*l *iliFe mt ,x D =o trt E*'o
l o z
r .It
m a
=-t
U)z
m
m
m o l<'
lz
l=l=
t>
Ir-
m
'tt
x z =z a
-l
c
X X X X
z a c t-
-l
z
t-m
i
€
l-r
-l I o
z
m
r c m
-o T€og +F
-z ZA
'z -(h
z>vx nti !<u<
>o ol m=@o z c
=
z
rn {
t---{m
l
o 2
X )4
f o z
t-
m
--t
m
_o
]!
c
^z
3
C)
z H
o r
l.
H z
ONF ;- o -'r
=a1 <!^!4-r:>:^
->'n Y.z(l.iitqo o'1 z tOq
Io 6I 6< E;2.4
'nzz {
:
N@=
Sm=
OJI 5-<tr<
=
FI
z
z
F
@ g
r-
=z o i m a
z z
z
m
t-
z
n n o t t-
o
;
z
H
-
N Fi H
H
\o
-{o
-.1
r 'tt
m
=-!.'l
m m
(t)
m
+
x
t-m
z c T
m
L -{
m
9.
z
m
tn
=@
n
m
m
--l
z
1t tn m
=m
I
z
t-c 3
=o
m t-m
-t
o
t-
'o
z
-m
x
-
=
m
=
=
m
='Tl
m m
U)
VALUATION
T m
=-{
z
9
I
H
H
F
m
z
t-
2
m t-m o -{,
a)
t-
z
Ltl
@ ('l
ii \N NX\R F os\- --N \ i\*tA,-' ) \,
f]t]D
uD!
={
- a-T'>
-t I /-\
=v.-"\_>
(
C I
(p
m
fe,
:- aD l*h E l<x f t.0 x q
l'" -r o fOna l'n ;l-. i o
t:; o lls I
| --r - t
;?.o<!^
o:i
-@ @o
>1
o
-o
m
:-{
=mCD
-1. \,
-;=Y z=z
YP r
t
-t
'n 'D Or-
z<
a2
=6)
\N
\'n F\
irq;'[6 i
8*
=o
ST .-{ ^9F
9=I {c
3=c)=
i6
I C)tom
:m
;:
-r c)o>
zA
,z >m
-r .>
I a)T
-{m
-{
a
=m
b
z
T F
P .A
Etl --l
:9,^l
5Sl
$ul Fsl FI
$,1 x)d
r
al
I
I
I
I
or-
aA o>'r
-nJ
r",
Zl 'l
I
I
I
I
I
;
tt ,3 nF
ls t<
l>l:
ls
li
I
I
I
H l)t{
F
lar K
t>
lF t,
lF lz
li
t{
12
ln t<t>
l-l!lm
13 p
I
{ l-r Elo ml<
lz
>l<{\ t>
I l.-
sl3 )lz 'lo
I-\F-D
itn l"'
I
I
I
l-r lo l{
lz
ie l<I>I-
lft
lm
t:
-r l><F
tr p p
l'n ,J'
|"
I rl
I
I
11. ' E V N: t> t>[< tr l<
FH E tf'H t<I-F IF
N lq.'r
h, lLl
'FlFl " N, lgl Y I EI 'ttxl N I le,l Bltfl
c
.o
_t
z
|-
m
5
-i (n
z m
m
m
l< '
iiEig :;giI
.[gcni
:; iF6
:(no=:t -=-.oo)sE3;:
5:a;s o33dd
l;i E;3ag{g
ArEIF
9 ;'a !.3 ila3.1 qc3.'=
Fa3i8 iir99
3P-6=--..d=IF
:e3ri
Ei3si OYJC-i or!r=J
sEisS +do a:
3.:iqE 6ilods.,; D :.1 at f o --*
#il!
o t
o o z -{
o {
,
-
at
m r
VALUAIION
,*rl"toN REouEsr
TOWN OF VAIL OF PFOJECT
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR FRI
DATE
CALLER
TUES AM PM]READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER " PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
0 o
O FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
D HEATING
E
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL tr FINAL
O APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTION REQUEST."
TOWN OF VAIL PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON TUES -WED THUR FRI Attt PMi.,
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
I] ROUGH i D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER tr
tr
o
tr
o
o
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
Uppen Enele Vellev
WATER AND SANITATION DISTR ICTS
846 FOREST ROAD . VAIL, COLORADO 81657
(303) 476.7480
Aprll 21, 1987
Peter Patten
Planning & Envlronmental CommiaaLon
Town of Vall
75 So. Frontage Road West
Vall, Colorado 81657
Re: Roof Top Parklng
Upper Eagle Valley Consolldated sanitatlon District
Dear Mr. Patten 3
In conjunctlon wlth the above referenced proJect approved by the Vall
Plannlng and Envlronrnental Comisslon, I share the Comlsslon-s concern
for screenlng our roof top parklng fron the future I-70 exlt whlch will
lntersect the eouth frontage road near our west property llne.
As a pub1lc agency, we conmit to do our part to provide appropriate
landscaplng ln the highway rlght-of-*ay at the northwest end of our
property line to facllltate_ the above screenlng.
A speclflc landscape plan wlll be developed soon after the State Hlghnay
DepartDent has completed Lte intersectloa deslgn. I{e understand that
Design RevLew Board approval ls needed prior to landscape lnstallation.
Sl-nce re Iy ,
SANITATION DISTRICT
EIID,/ng
Drager ,
\ ll pARTrcrparrNo DrsTRrcrs - aRRowHEAo METR. *ATER . AVoN METRo warER . BEAVER CREEK METR' warER . BERR' .REEK METR. wora* /6aft1
a\
EAGLE''a'L MErRo w".'" ' '"*""ii,I,,,'I::y::::;;::ffTH:?::'J?::1'":Tff*::'" ""*'.. coNsoLrDA''rEo saN'aa'oN
@
75 soulh tronlage road
yail. colorado 8't657
(303) 476-7000
April 2, 1987
olf lce ol communlty developmonl
Mr. David Krenek
Operations Director
Upper Eagle VaIIey Consolidated Sanitation District 846 Forest Road Vail, colorado 8L657
Dear David:
r wourd like to apologize for any inconvenience resulting frorn the.rescheduling of April 13th's planning commission meeting to April 20. The meeting had to be rescheduled because of our oversight in providing the Vail frail with proper public notice of your agenda item. As you may know, we are reguired to publish agenda items 15 days prior to the meeting date. By missing this deadline, we trad no alternative but to reschedule the meeting one week l-ater.
Once again I apologize for our oversight. I hope the rescheduling has not inconvenienced you.
Sincerely,
^\/i\^"4 &.JS,*(.---
Thomas A. Braun Senior Planner
TAB: bpr
75 soulh trontage .oad
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
April 2, L9A7
olllce of communlly development
Mr. David E Mott
Upper EagJ-e Valley Consolidated Sanitation District 846 Forest Road Vai1, Colorado 8A657
Dear David:
r lrould like to apologize for any inconvenience resulting frorn the.rescheduling of april 13th's Planning Commission meeiing to April 20. The ureeting had to be rescheduled because of our oversight in providi-ng the Vail Trail with proper public notice of your agenda item. As you may know, hre are required to publish agenda items 1-5 days prior to the meeting date. By missing this deadline, we had no alternative but to reschedule the meeting one week later.
Once again I apologize for our oversight. I hope the rescheduling has not inconvenienced you.
Sincerely,
A
^\^^t
&\(.-"_-=-_--
Thomas A. Braun Senior Planner
TAB:bpr
Uppen Enel-E VltleY
WATE R AND SANITATION D ISTR ICTS
84€ FOR€ST FOAD . vAlL, CoLORADO 81657
(30 3) 476-7480
March 3, 1987
Mr. Ron Phllltps
Manage r
TOI,JN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Val1 , Colorado 81657
RE: On-slte Parking, Vail PlanE
Upper Eagle Valley Consolldated Sanitatlon District
Dear Ron:
As you are aware, the DisErict plans to vacate the tenporary parklng across the
aEreet from our Vail saniEatlon plant in favor of provldlng on-sLte parklng. Ihis
wl1l alleviate the visual lmpacts of the temporary parking and allow the site to
accornmodate your consEructlon staging for your Forest Road bridge wldening proJect
thls year.
I have provided your planning deparEnent wlth an informatlonal set of
construcElon documents and wl11 appreciate comments and suggestlons. We intend to
stay strlctly wlthin our property 1lnes and will have a nlnl-rnal effect on the
exlstlng landscaping.
Past pracclce has noE required the Distrlct to go through the Town-s plan
approval or bulldlng pernit process; however, I would llke to maintain a spirlt of
cooperacLon by sollcitlng your lnpuE. Please let ne know when we could get together
wlth you and/or your staff to discuss the projecE and review on-slce staking. I{e
plan to begin the bldding process in mid-March.
Slncerely,
uwR/ EAGLE VALLEY CoNSOLTDATED SANTTAION DTSTRTCT
t/;, tlbf David E. Mott
General Manager
DEM: das.40
xc: Vall Plannlng Departnent
\ ll pARTrcrpATrNG DtsrRtcrs aRRowHEAo MET^. w,.rER. AVoN METRo warER a BEAVER CREEK METRo warER . BERRV cREEK METRo *ota^ /4I^n'-\
0\
EAGLE VA'|L METRo w".'^ ""*o^ll,Iin::::::iff:JfiTH:?::'#::T,:Ttrff::vaLLEV coNsoL'DATED sAN'ra'oN
@
Uppen Enele VllleY
WATER AND SANITATION D ISTR ICTS
846 FOREST ROAD . v lL, COLORADO 81657
(303) 476 7480
March 12, 1987
Betsy Rosolack
Town of Vall
75 South Frontage Road
Vai1, Colorado 81657
RE: Conditional Use Pe rmlc for Rooftop Parktng
Dear Betsy:
Enclosed are the fol1-owlng items:
l. An l4rovenent survey starryed by a reglstered surveyor r^rtrlch lncludes contour lLnea
and tree locatlons.
2. Phocographs of the bulldings frorn al1 dlrecclons.
3. Elevattons of the building, shordng raq, exlsting grades, flnish grades and handrall.
4. A finish grade site plan showlng the access road, portraylng che dlmnsions of road aE
the narronest polnt.
The Flre Department has approved the access road along wlth removl-ng a portlon of the fence
along the fronEage road to allow access off the frontage road.
A P.E. sta4 on the drawlngs wlll be provided next week.
A revised landscape plan was not aubml.tted because the State ltighway Departnent has asked us to
not nake any rpre lnprovenents nithin the StaEe Road lllght-of{'Jay untll after the nain
lnterchange has been corpleted. We wtll be happy to provide screenLng (subJect to your and
StaEe Htghway approval ) along the norEh side vrtren the interchange is coqlete. We will budget
$31000 to $4,000 co couplete thls landscaping norEh of the parklng lot. A ecreenl-rg of. 507" to
702 ls posslble uslng Evergreens along the north slde.
The State Ittgtnray Departnent l-s ln favor of our proJect, provldlng we can keep the accegg road
on our property, wttlch we are dolng.
If you have any further questl-ons, please feel free to contact ne.
Sincerely,
I,PPER EAGLE VAI,LEY CONSOLIDAf,ED SANITATION DISTRICT
Wr^.a P^"J
Davld Krenek, P.E.
operatlons Director
Enc:
DK/ng:57
,,<:::\I II PARTICIPATING DISTRICTS _ ARROWHEAD METRO WATER O AVON METRO WAIER
'
BEAVER CREEK METRO WATER ' BERRV CREEK METRO WATEF / CLE T \
a\
EAGLEVA'|LMETRow""^""*""f,ili]::y::::ff::ff1tr1?"":'#::1":T;;*::'."""'YcoNsoL'oarEo saN'rAa'oN
GF
75 soulh ,ronlage ?oad
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 offlce o, communlty developmenl
March 3, L987
Mr. Fred HasLee
Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitati.on District
846 Forest Road Vail, Col-orado 81657
Re: Conditional Use Permit for Rooftop Parking
Dear Fred:
Today I discussed with you the fact that we have not received additional support materials concerning your reguest for a sonditional use perrnit. Before we can schedule this request for a hearing before the Planning and Environrnental Comrnission, we wiII need the following:
I. An improvement survey stamped by a registered surveyor which Lncludes contour lines.
2. Photos of the buildings fron tbe highway side.
3. Elevations of the building showing the ranp, and showing the existing grades and finished grades.
s/"" f.Y")(x,:+,^'l 4. A.site pLan indicating landscaping and dimensions of width of the road at its narrowest point.l1\tq,$^t$d rt A'h
5. The Fire Departrnent is asking for a roof manifold (stand.pipel 0/C
on tlre building, .or provide Fire Department access.' /;r;',;',_
6. Public Works woul-d like a P.E. stamp on drawings A-l and A-2 or a letter from the engineer who reviewed those sheets stating that the existing structure is adequate to support loading conditions anticipated with the creation of the parking lot.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
l,o( tf "1"'
o
P"b VJ-*,h/.
/"t"*ttz-z-
Tu-- e/."x-
U.:: 8/"J
o
lnttn
75 3oulh trontrg€ road
vail, colorudo 81657
(303) 476-7000 offlcc of communlty deuolopornl
March 3, L987
Mr. Fred Haslee
Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District
846 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Conditional Use Pernrit for Rooftop Parking
Dear Fred:
Today I discussed with you the fact that we have not received additional- support materials concerning your request for a conditional use permit. Before vre can schedule this reguest for a hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission, we will
need the following:
Photos of the buildings from the highway side.
l.
2.
-t/**'tf) n.
€Y.rs*rx'S
/- 6.,rj6 Public Works wouLd like a P.E, stanp on drawings A-l and A-2.or a letter from the engineer who reviewed those sheetg stating tbat the exi.sting structure is adequate to eupport lorddng conditions urticipated with the creation of the parking lot.
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
5.
If
o
_ slTuj.Ted
DUTU-IaCUOC S I er.Talpul ?_Tdddns lxel {el{f no^ qlr1r{ pess.rnssTp
ur.roJ 1{e1"! slT uo eTpood IzeI
e_T esn reuoTfTpuoc e JoJ lsenbal Jnon
Teuor+Tppe pa^-rrcajr +ou e^e/\q e^l fer.{1 J ^epof,,
a1q1 nq lsaluocs 6ut66oC at{1 {eq1 ,relo spedun[ soJ uAorq >tpTno eqf
AE;
V.!-&P"rlc,) ,
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:.' u a /tz_ /r
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
i NTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVI El.I
DATE OF PUEL
'oo-f
C HEARING
PUBLIC WORKS
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:oate J-/2' x'7
comments:
e/1 -/v-z'-o-,2,o',"t ,ao'Qzz'z x- y'':<z't''"2--' ,/*
./--,a-'*z'"f,"* '2'J'
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comnrents:
Date
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Rev'iewed by:
Comments:
Date
Appl ication
PECMeetinq ] Z/zs/
APPLiCATION FOR COi,IDITIOIIAL USE PERI,IIT
I' This procedure is required for any project required to obtain a conditional use permit.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAI4E OF APPLICANT rEa J-e Val.le Consolidat anita
ADDRESS 846 Foresr Road Vail, CO
Date of
Date of
87657
PHoNE 476-7480
NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRTSENTATIVE pavid L. Krenek, p.e.
c.
^uuKL)5 846 Forest Road
Vail, CO pHONE 47 6-7 480
NAI4E 0F OHNER(S) (print or
ol,JNER(S) r STGNATURE(S)
ADDRESS
Vail, Co pHgNE 476-7490
D.LOCATION OF
ADDRESS
& Tract 'rDrl
PROPOSAL: LEGAL- LOT 31 BLOCK FILING Vail Village 2nd
E. FEE groo ,tro! ]+i22 cK #!Jt p
THE FEE I"IUST BE PAID BEFORE THE DEPARTI4ENT
ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
. F. { ljst of the names of owners of al.l property . INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHND AND ACROSS STNTiTiI
THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONNECi
II. PRE-APPLICATION CLAUSE
0F C0M,'4UNITY DEVEL0PMENT l,llLL
adjacent to the subject property
and their mai ling adoresses.
OI{NERS AND CORRECT ADDRESSES.
A PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE I,JITH A PLANNING STAFF I,IEI,IBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED T0 DETERT'IINE IF ANY ADDITIoNAL INFORiIATioN is-r'tibgii. ""uii nppricATr0N t,,rLL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS-IT^Is cor'lPlETE f uusr irqciuo'r-nii-irri',ii nrQurnro By rHE z'NrNG ADI'IINISTRAToR)' IT-Is THEAPPLICATIi'i-nEspor,rirsrrii io-i,inxE AN App0TNTMENT I,IITH THE sTAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADOiTior.rqi 'sUBI,Iiiini"n!OurnEI.IENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT l.,lgtltlt APPLICATI0N-|,lrLL STRrAr.lLrNE THE AppR0VAL pR0cEss FOR Y0uR PROJEcr ev DEcEmri{G THE lrur'reen oe coruoriioiii or nppnovAL THAT THE fiffrffilrtlli,yifr|s ,s!!s:norTroNs oF nFpnovei'iiuii'sEtdHpLrED r,'iTH BEFSRE A
I €'&
al, /v,.,6,t
^
_ | - Q -?tt:
,----
OV ER
:7 UppER Elcle Vl
WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICTS
846 FOREST ROAD . VAIL, COLORAoo ai657
(303) 476 7480
February 18, 1987
Krlstan Prltz
Town Planner
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Vail Wastewater Plant Conditional Use Permit
Dear KrisEan:
Enclosed ls a coropleted Condlcional Use Permlt Appllcatlon for che Vail
Wastewater Plant parking 1oc.
I^Ie are proposlng constructlng a parklng lot on Eop of the west half of the
Vail plant. It would be accessed from our present parking lot and Pass
along the north slde of the building. The entire access road would be
located on district property.
We have xoet r^rith officials of the State Highway DepartmenE for their
comments and they have no problem wlth our plan. They would 1lke to delay
any additional trees belng planted along the northwest corner of the 1ot
untll- the lnterchange Deslgn is conplete. We w111 agree at thls tlme to
plant addltional trees ln the area to provlde screening after the State
Highway Departnent personnel have made thelr finprovements.
Having planters or green space on top of the parklng 1ot w111 not be
possible because of load bearlng capaclty linlts.
I hope chis applicatl-on meets r'JlEh your approval slnce our presenl parklng
1ot east of the planE ls an undesl-rable locatlon.
Thank you for your conslderatlon.
Slnce re1y,
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED SANITATION DISTRICT
o
LLEY
#r-a /4"*/
David Krenek, P.E.
Operatlons Dlrector
DK/ng
'rl ,,:'-. --"r
rII PARTICIPATIN6 DISTRICTS ARROWHEAD METFO WATER'AVON METROWAAER' BEAVER CREEK METRO WATER I' BERRY CREEK METRO WATER / CLEAiI \
/lll EA6LE.vATL METRo wATER. EowaRDs METRo WATEF{ . LAKE cREEK MEADows warER . ur'pER EAGLE vALLEy coNsoltoarED sANtrartoN GED
!7 rtr vatL vaLLEy coNSoLtDATED WATER a VAjL WATER AND SANITATION
l
o
LLEY
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS NEXT TO THE VAIL
WASTEWATER SEWER PLANT, VAIL, COLORADO.
1. Town of Vail
75 South Forntage Road
Vai1, Colorado 81657
2. Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
:/
Uppen Enele Vl
WATER ANO SANITATION DISTRICTS
846 FOR€ST ROAD . VAIL, COTORADO 81657
(303) r175-7440
l ll panrrcrparr{G DrsrRrcrs - aRRowHEAD METRo warER a avoN METRo warER . BEA'ER cREEr< ME rRo warER . BERRV cREEK METRo wa-a* /'6ili\
a\
EAGLE''a'L MErFo w""^"o*"^;:,I;;:;::::::i;r::ffTH:?:r'-H:1',:Tff;:',::"aLLE., coNsoL'oarED saN'ra'oN
@
INTER-OEPARTMENTAL REV I El.l-
PROJECI.
DATE SUBMITTED:- DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC I,{ORKS
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Date
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by, G 4 oate z/zy'AZ
Corments:
a'1 e L€ 7 7<z
-TtJose s7/<E -7s
/S 4a€Q ''/tt "/e'
Arz4 2.4€
Reviewed by:
Comments:
lfto-.o lf*v{ 4 P.€. trr4',4P c,^J 2ea-tt,r6s 4-/ i 4 -Z
Fao.n -Z /e- €1" G /^, €7-r<- a//o K<wt€-"' ec>
-97'? //.\..,,6 7//l t' -2,/€- €t , , 7 "tC s- 7<ua7o(€
=6 .9u /7a <--Z 1.t4oz.,tG C6.-O -z,a^-t J Aai'/./a9 7C.b
</1(,9/',op oF -//{ F4,e <tuC L<t/.
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
I t I t
\
t
o
o
n
I
v
It
\\
\
../t V\
\\
t't t'
v o ll 7
s.
o$
t \
",
to,
i't
\
\
\_-.-?-
$
o
J tt
.1,
)
t
I
0.
o I I
\
F
z
H
{I
o
0 t I (
J
H (
(
l
t t
\
\
t
o
o
n
I
v
0.
1
I
\\
\\
o
o
o rl
I
I
I
I
I
I t
I
I
--/
$)c {I
I
\I \
rV
o
k
-/\
\! ----
\\\r t\
\
\
\
\
\
i
t
I \I
\
I
o^
os
\
$"^
\'. \o
\!
t
tor
i't i\
.V
\
\
9
o.
$
s\s 7 rf
$.
\\\l \l \t
\\
--\ \\s\
\\I
\
I
\\
I
t
\
PI,ANNING AND EWIRONMENTAL April 20 | 1,997
PRESENT J.J. CoIIins
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins
Peggy osterfoss Sid Schultz
Jim Viele
ABSENT
Bryan Hobbs
The rneetl-ng was called to order by the chairrnan, Jim Viete.
1. Approval of minutes of March 9 and March 23.
Diana Donovan moved and J.J. Collins seconded to approve the minutes of ttre meeting of Marctr 9. The vote was 6-0 in favor.Diana Donovan rnoved and Peggy Osterfoss seconded to approve the neeting of l4arch 23. The vote was 6-0 in favor.
2. a. A request to adopt rules of procedure for home
occupancy revocation hearings.
Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney, explained that for tbe first tirne, a home occupancy permit revocation was being appealed. He explained that this would be a quasi-judicial hearing and the
PEC would act like a judge and would decide whether or not to uphold or overturn the revocation of tbe license. larry gave the Planning Corunission a list of rules of procedure.
Diana Donovan moved. to ad.opt the trComrnission Regulations Setting Forth Procedures Applicable to Appeals of the Revocation of Home Occupancy Permits by the Zoning Adrninistrator. I The motion was seconded by pam Hopkins and the vote to adopt lras 6-0 in favor.
2.b. Consideration of a r est for a sta of execution of the o rof ator revo Vail East
Ren Inc.at ermit and e shment of
a ate to hear Iof the revoca!on of the East
Va I Rentals, Inc.on
Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney, explained that he felt there was no harm done by granting a stay of execution, since there would probably not be very much business until June.Diana Donovan moved and Pam Hopkins seconded to hold the hearing of this license on May 27 at 3:OO pM. The vote was 6-0 in favor of this date.
COMMISSTON
STAFF PRESENT
FAEer PaEEAn
Tom Braun
Rick Pylrnan Kristan Pritz
Betsy Rosolack
(
3.A request for a conditional use perrnit in order to
tne
llpeef Eaqr located at 846 Forest Road.
solidated Sanitation ulsErrcE
(
Peter Patten explained that this building was located in the
PUD zone district and the planning Commiision sets the standards for this zone district as appricable. uEVcsD wished to relocate their parking facirity from Town of Vair land and Vail Associates property to their own property. He showed. site plans and explained that the staff was concerned that there be some type of screening to the west as well as to the north.
Dave Mott, applicant, stated that he had no problen with Iandscaping to buffer the view to the north, but it was difficult to do now until the width of the road is known. He felt that UEVCSD should not be asked to submit a bond to the Town of vail since he felt this was inappropriate between two government entities, but was willing to submit a 1etter of credit. He added that he would be willing to raise to 42,r the rail on the parapet wall to the west, but felt that no amount of.screening would be adeguate to hide the parking from the building to the west.
Peter stated that a bond was standard procedure with everybody,but that a letter of credit would be fine. He added. that-some buffer to the west was important for future developrnent on the adjacent property. Peter presented the parking proposar to the Town Council, and they had no problerns with the proposaf.
Pan Hopkins was concerned about having enough landscapinq to the north and having it done well. she feti that witir tie new road so crose to the existing road, enough landscaping was very inportant. Sid Schultz and Diana Donovin agreed. peSSy osterfoss stated that she did not feel comfortable appioving the request until she had more inforrnation on the fi;;r d.esi.gn of the new ramp and whether or not there wourd be enough rooi to landscape the area for adequate screening.
J-J. collinsr nain concern was with rnaking certain that there would be enough landscaping provided when the Highway Departmentrs design vras completed. He felt that theie really was no way to plan the landscaping without State Highway Department input. J.J. rs second concern was with screeiring the lot to the west. He fert that with the present conditions] the proposed parapet wall was adequate, but was concerned that future use of the property to the west would change the
required screening.
Peterrs concern was that in the future the Town could not go back and ask for nore or different screening.
J.J. moved to approved the request for the conditional use permit conditional upon Design Review Board review and in 1i9ht of reguirements for landscapingr on the north property line,especially as it would be related to the new exit. also required would be a letter of credit frorn the applicant. The motion $/as seconded by Parn Hopkins and the vote-ior approvat was 5-0.
est for a side setback variance in order to co ruct a res ence on Parcel B, a res vts10n of Lots 14 and 1-7 ock 7, Va Village First F licants:Dlr.Mrs.chael Tennenbaum
A 4.
Rick Pylman showed site plans and explained that the applicant was requesting a 10 foot variance from the 1-5 foot sid6 setback reguirement for a lot which had recently been created by the applicant. Rick stated that the applicants also onned the property to the east (Parcel A) and were willing to restrict development on parcel A to a distance af 2s feei fron the property line by use of a deed restriction or covenants. Rick explained that the staff requested that this area be left as ( undisturbed open space, but the applicants declined to leave \ this buffer undisturbed. Rick arso stated that the side setback area requested for encroachrnent contained. several fairly significant natural features, including tr,ro large spruce trees. Tbe staff recornmendation was for denial of the-side setback variance because they fert there was no physical hardship driving the side setback encroachment and- felt it would be a grant of special privilege.
Jay Peterson, representing the appricants, stated that the applicants could have achieved the reguested setbacks if they had requested a special development district, but had preferred.to go through a subdivision process instead. They felt that any problems could be achieved through the variance procedure. He felt the integrity of the setbacks was being maintained.
J.J. collins stated that he did not see why a building could.not be designed in such a sray that it rernained within the setbacks and did not destroy large trees. Jay replied that this was the area in which to place the house-to take advantage of the views.
{.{. pointed out that the appricant had a c}ear rot on which to build and plenty of roorn. ilv replied. that when the trade-offs becarne too great, they decided to ask for a variance. He added that hundreds of hours were spent on various schemes on al1 three sites.
(
Peggy asked if there was any interest in protecting the two evergreen trees that would be lost. Jay replied that they were already spend.ing a lot of money on landscaping. peggy said .1.,f .did a good job of expressing her views. She felt that she would work with the proposal if the lost landscaping would be replaced.
Jay stated that a landscaped buffer could be a condition of approval . Kurt Cegerberg stated tbat they were trying to bring landscaping into the building area and attention woul_d be paid to bring landscaping into the buffer area.
Diana felt it was too bad that the applicant first created the Iot and then could not design a house to fit the lot.
Jay replied ttrat he could have asked for a special developrnent distict and gotten rid of the property line and kept within the interity of the zone code and received approval . He added that he would rather use the variance procedure as long as he could keep the integrity of the zone code,
Sid shared a lot of the feelings the other members stated. lle wished it hadnrt gotten to this state, but felt if there was a 3Or buffer between the houses, it woutd preserve the distance factor. He added ttrat he did not feel driven to preserve the rocl< outcropping.
Pam felt that there rdas no hardship on which to base the granting of a variance.
Jay replied that any ti.rne the pEC is given a variance, they look at it on a site by site basis, that each project stands aIone.
Jim Viele agreed with Jay with respect to the proces. He added that if there is no objective judgement involved, there wouLd be no variance procedure. He stated that in the overall view,the purpose of the setbacks is to rnaintain the distance of separation between dwellings. He wondered if the project would be a better one if it conforrned to the setback regulations and added that he would rather see the house where is was proposed.to be rather than take out additional trees.
J.J. asked why the house was sited where it was on parcel A to the west, and Kurt replied that they were trying to pick up views of Gore Range and down va1ley and that-tfre awelfing was broken up to help to reduce the rnassiveness of the proje-t.
J.J. stated that on Parcel B he saw plenty of room within the reguired setbacks.
curt said he could not argue with the fact that one can fit t
(something on the lot, but the trees were a major concern. Jay added that on any given site one can build without goinq into setback areas, but it may make an uninteresting town.J.J. pointed out that each time he had seen the pEC challenge an architect, the architect had been able to come up witb a pJ-an within the setbacks. He repeated the fact thai tne architect in this case had a clean piece of property. Jay
answered that they had voLuntarily torn down the existing structure and shoul-d be given latitude to build, that they were being penalized for rnaking a clean site.
Viele spoke in favor of the proposal as long as the buffer would remain. Jay answered that there would. be a deed restriction that only the Town of VaiI could remove the buffer.Pan Hopkins pointed out that. another owner could hire Jay to ask to remove the buffer. She added that the pEC was going through this process because Parcel A had to be a rninirnun site.Jay said the purpose of the subdivision was to stop from having two old homes being add.ed onto. He added that they knew they nigtrt have to ask for variances when they planned Lhe subdivision.
Peter Patten felt that the naturar features should be preserved.within the 1-5 foot setback area and added that this was a self created hardship.
Jin Viele moved to approve the variance with the findings that the strict or literal interpretation or enforcernent of ihe specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objeetives of the zone code. He specified that particular attention be paid by the DRB of landscaping planned to be in the 30 foot buffer. Sid seconded the motion and the vote was 4 in favor and 2 (JJ and Parn) against.
est for front side rear and stream setback
ances te eovera e vart ange ss res ential oor area var ance and a variance from er to construc addit on Parcels A
and B, Lot B ock Va 1 Villa eF rst F Linq.cant;Jerome A. Lew s, Down Street Foundation
(
5.
Betsy Rosolack presented the proposal, stating that the applicants wanted to build two Z-car garages ind additional square footage allowed under Ordinance 4 of 1995. The staff recomnendation was for denial as it was felt the additions could be constructed within the setback areas.
Tom Briner, one of the architects on the project, spoke in favor.of the project and Dan Rickli, another architect,explained that there seemed to be a discrepancy in the amount of sguare footage that they were adding. Jerry Lewis and John
(
Kennerly, applicants, also spoke in favor of the project.Rickli felt that garages should not be counted as- sile coverage if they were not counted as GRFA. He also proposed elirninating 4 parking spaces and decreasing the curb cuts irom 4 to 3.
Jirn Viele asked Betsy if the staff had had tine to review the
new proposal , and she replied that they had not.
Craig Snowdon, architect representing the adjacent neighbors to the west, Steve Berkowitz, read a letter from Berkowitz objecting to the encroachments, stating that views would be negatively irnpacted.
J.J. felt it was difficult to consider the proposal with a discrepancy in statistics. Peggy osterfoss-agreed and also felt concern for Berkowitz's views. Rickli disagreed that the additions would impact the views from the Berkowitz property.
Peggy added tbat tbe burying of the garage was a step in ttre right direction, but she stated that she would like to see fewer than 3 road cuts vith more landscaping instead of asphalt. Diana agreed and added that her main concern was the stream setbaclc.
Sidts blggest concern was site covera€te. He aLso felt there was too rnuch asphalt. Briner mentioned that this was a DRB issue' Pam l{opkins abstained from comment because trer firm was working on the Berkowitz proposal .
Jirn viere stated ttrat when-a proposal contains so many variance reguests, it is a good indication that too much is be-ing placed on the site.
Jerry Lewis asked if he could table and peter answered that the item could be tabled until 4/27 if the applicant could get revised figures and drawings into the couununity Developient Departmant by Wednesday rnorning, the 22nd.
Leraris requested to table xo 4/2'7. Diana noved. and sid. second.ed to table the request until Aprit 2?. The vote was 5-O-L (pam abstained from voting. )
6. I Tgaggg! to 3rnend spe t ro. e,Vail Villaqe fnn.
Ton Braun presented the arnendrnent request and stated the staff recommended denial , citing the need for additional parking,assurances the ski Museurn would be relocated, and the need'for accommodation units.
Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, reminded the board that twice the vail vitlage rnn complex had sulrnitted phased projects, but the potentiaL developers could not fund the projects- Now Joe staufer will develop the new phases himself.,fay explained the valet parking and stlted that it was a ternporary measure until the next phase could be constructed. fle stated that it was not economicalry feasible for Mr. staufer to construct additional parking with this phase.
t
(Jay stated that the applicant was willing to restrict the dwelling units per the staff recommendation. Regarding tbe ski Museum, Jay stated that 4,000 square feet of building iould be givg! to the Town to use free of charge for any use the Town would want.
Pam asked if valet parking was planned for the commercial area,and Jay replied that it vas not. Joe Staufer stated that he had 30 - 50 parking spaces that are always empty. He added that the Sonnenalp, Plaza, and Bell Tower had all expanded and none had added any parking.
Jay then pointed out that there \,rere no large projects being constructed at this tirne which were not phased.
Pam agreed with the parking, and felt that perhaps rnore rocals would be using this parking 1ot. Sid also dia not have any problem with the parking and felt that to receive the 41000 square feet of space in the building was better for the Town than for the Town to receive gj_s,ooo to relocate the ski Museum. He did feet that the new residential units slrourd be controrred for public use. Diana felt the units needed to be avail-abl-e for rental . she felt that the Museum relocation must be worked out and rnust be a part of this amendrnent.
Joe staufer felt that the Town did not gain anything by trkicking the owner outt'especiarly if the ownei wanted-to be i-n vail for two months in the sunrner. Mr. staufer suggested that the unit be available for rental and not be the prii..y residence of the owner.
Diana stated that she did not patronize many of the stores in the vair village rnn eornplex because she did not have any place to park. Diana asked for a commitment to finish the uuiialng as proposed, However, she sti1l felt that there would be a -
parking problem. Jay said that for the parking to work, all the phases must be done.
Peggy osterfoss felt that the proposar shourd include assurance that the developer will relocate the ski Museurn and reland.scape because a landscaped area was being rernoved in the proposar.Jay replied that with the new proposar, the Town of va-il would end up wi-th a large chunk of real estate. He added that the applicant.was willing to participate in redoing the intersection. Peggy stated that she did not wait to see the landscaping issue lost in the shuffle, and felt the responsibility rested wittr the developer.
More discussion followed concerning parking. peter pointed out that parking spaces under the condos were iontrolted by a gate and were under utilized. Ton felt that it was the reslonsiri:.-ity of the developer to provide parking on the site. J.J.referred to the rnemo which indicated a shortfall of loo spaces.He was told LB? of the spaces nere required to be valet and he
(
t
L
(
wondered how the decision was made to have 188 of the spaces be vaLet. Ton replied that it varied. with use. He added that phases I and II contained 22,OOO square feet and phase III contained L0,O0O sqluare feet with no parking provided. He added that he felt it was the repsponsibility of the developer to provide parking on the site.
Joe Stauffer said he would like to be able to pay into the park5-ng fund as did businesses in Commercial Core I and II.J.J. suggested that perhaps Staufer could pay the Town for parking at building permit tine and the Town could repay Staufer when his parking was complete.
The Ski Museum was discussed. Torn stated that at present the
amended SDD did not address the needs of the Ski Museum. Jay pointed out that the space offered to the Town was worth 91-Million. J.J. said it seemed like an opportunity for tlre Town,the space could be sold for a substantial amount of cash. Tom pointed out that one condition was that it be used for the public, Jay stated that they were willing to remove that stipulation.
if .J. felt the key issue of the omer/rental question was occu-pancy and thj.s issue was discussed. Also discussed was the deletion of randscaping for parking. saundra srnith stated that they were wi).ling to renove two parking spaces and place Iandscaping in place of the spaces.
Peter felt to approve the proposed shortfall of parkingr would be inconsistent. He pointed out that the Westin $/as not able t9 do any more construction until the parking structure was finished. He stated that the Plaza and Sell-Tower were different, in that they were in a pedestrian area and paid into the parking fund. He pointed out that the proposal under construction was adjacent to the 4-way stop with vehicle access and nust have on-site parking.
,f.J. discussed the parking figures. Joe Staufer proposed to make the dwelling'units be available for rentar when they were unoccupied.
Sid Schultz moved and J.,f. Collins seconded to approve the
annendrnents to SDD 6 as submitted with the following conditioins:
The use of the units be restricted. to non-primary residence and be part of a rental pool.
The applicant shal1 participate in and not remonstrate against a special irnprovement district for the intersection of Vail noad and Meadow Drive.
3.
The vote was 5-1 in favor.
(
1.
2.
A
a
7.
J.J. left at this point.
est for setback variances in order to construct ons to rtv at Lot 2 Bloc vail vil-}a
Howard Ju and Steven Berkowitz
9.A request to amend the zo code in order to add a ne\,\r zone district to be ent tled trHills de Res dentia Applicant: Town of VaiI
This itern was tabled.
(
Rick Pylnan showed a site plan and explained the proposal ,adding that the staff recomnendation was for appr6va-1 . ciaig
Snowd.on, architect for the project, explained the plans. p"SSy osterfoss suggested the deck be only over the garage, and Criig said he would reduce the deck.
Diana rnoved and Peggy seconded to approve the request per the staff memo. The vote l''as 4 - O - I abstention (Farn). -
8. A fectuest for a side satback wari anr.ro in rrrrior {.a
Tom Braun showed an improvement survey and explained the request. Gary Walker, representing the applicant, stated that the rnain reason for the location of the garage was to have access to an existing driveway and parking in front of the garage.
Diana Donovan moved and pam Hopkins seconded to approve the request per the staff memo. The vote lras 5-O in favor.
A request for a side setback variance in grder to construct a garage
Yl"")rC
est for a conditional use rmit in order to
a lot on of the west half of the r Eaqle V ev Water tat on water plant
located at 846 Forest Road.
3.Are
(
ated Sanitation District
Peter Patten explai-ned that this building was located in the PUD zone district and the planning Cornmission sets the standards for this zone district as applicable. uEVcsD sished to relocate their parking facility from Town of Vail land and vail Associates.property to their own property. He showed site plans and explained that the staff uas concerned that there be some type of screening to the west as well as to the north.
Dave Mott, applicant, stated that he had no problem with J-andscaping to buffer the view to the north, but it was difficult to do now until the width of the road is known. He felt that uEvcsD should not be asked to submit, a bond to the Town of vail since he felt this was inappropriate between two gtovernment entities, but was willing to submit a letter of credi.t. He added that he would be willing to raise to 42r the rail on the parapet waII to the west, but felt that no amount of.:creening would be adeguate to hide the parking fron the building to the west.
Peter stated that a bond was standard procedure with everybody,but that a letter of credit would be fine. He add.ed. that-sorne buffer to the west was important for future development on the adjacent property. Peter presented the parking proposal to the Town Council , and they had no problems with the proposal .
Parn Hopkins lras concerned about having enough landscaping to the north and having it done wert. she feri that witl tfre new road so close to the existing road, enough landscaping was very important. sid Schultz and Diana Donovin agreed. peSSy osterfoss stated that she did not feel cornfoitabre appioving the request until she had more information on the ri.nh design of the new ramp and whether or not there would be enough rooi to landscape the area for adequate screening.
J.,f. colrinst nain concern was with making certain that there would be enough landscaping provided when the Highway Departrnentrs design was compreted. He felt that-there rea11y was no way to plan the landscaping without State Highway Departrnent input. ,t.J. rs second concern was with s6reeiing the lot to the west. He felt that with tbe present conditions] the proposed parapet wall was adequate, but was concerned that future use of the property to the west would change the
.t
required screening.
Peterrs concern was that in the future the Town could not go back and ask for more or different screening.
J.J. moved to approved the reguest for the conditional use permit conditional upon Design Review Board review and in liqht of reguirements for landscaping on tlre north property 1ine,especially as it would be related to the new exit. Also required would be a letter of credit from the applicant. The motion \das seconded by Parn Hopkins and the vote ior approval hras 5-0.
4. A est
uaE n
for a side setback variance in order to a residence on Pa B, a resubdivision of Lots Block 7, VaiI ViI First F : Mr. and Mrs. Mic Tennenbaum
cons 14a
ApET
(
Rick Pylnan-showed site plans and explained that the applicant was reqfuesting a 10 foot variance fron the ]-5 foot sidL- setback reguirement for a lot which had recently been created by the applicant. Rick stated that the applicants also owned tle property to the east (Parce1 A) and were willing to restrict developrnent on Parcel A to a distance of 29 feet from the property J.ine by use of a deed restriction or covenants, Rick explained that the staff requested that this area be feft as undisturbed open space, but the applicants declined to leave this buffer undisturbed. nick also stated that the side setback area requested for encroachment contained several fairly significant natural features, including two large spruce trees. The staff recommendation was for deniil of the-side setback variance because they felt there was no physical hardship driving the side setback encroachrnent and-fe1t it would be a grant of special privilege.
Jay Peterson. representing the applicants, stated that the applicants could have achieved the reguested setbacks if they had reguested a special development district, but had preferied to go through a subdivision process instead. They felt that any problems could be achieved through the variance procedure. He felt, tbe integrity of the setbacks was being maintained,
J.J. Collins stated that he did not see why a building could not be designed in such a way that it remained within-the setbacks and did not destroy large trees. Jay replied that this was the area in which to place the house-to Lake advantage of the views.
J.J. pointed out that the applicant had a clear lot on which to build and plenty of room. Jay replied that when the trade-offs became too great, they decided to ask for a variance. He added that hundreds of hours were spent on various schemes on ar1 three sites.t
L
Peggy asked if there was any interest in protecting the two evergreen trees that would be lost. Jay replied that they were already spelding a lot of money on landscaping. peggy saia 9.,f.did a good job of expressing her views. she ielt tfrit stre would work witlr the proposal if the lost landscaping woul_d. be replaced.
Jay stated that a landscaped buffer could be a condition of approval . Kurt Cegerberg stated that they were trying to bring landscapi!9 into the building area and attention would be paid-to bring landscaping into the buffer area.
Diana felt it was too bad that the applicant first created the lot and then sould. not design a house to fit the lot.
Jay replied that he could have asked for a special developnent distict and gotten rid of the property line lnd kept within the interity of the zone code and received approval. He added that he would rather use the variance procedure as long as he could keep the integrity of the zone code.
Sid shared a lot of the feelings the other members stated. He wished it hadntt gotten to this state, but felt if there \,iras a 3or buffer betrrreen the trouses, it would preserve the distance factor. He added that he did not feer driven to preserve the rock outcropping.
Pam felt that there lras no hardship on which to base the granting of a variance.
Jay replied that any tine the pEC is given a variance, they look at it on a site by site basis, that each project stands alone.
Jirn viele agreed with Jay with respect to the proces. He ad.d.ed that if there is no objective judgement involved, there would
!-e no variance procedure. IIe stated that in the overarl- view,the purpose of the setbacks is to maintain the distance of separation between dwellings. He wondered if the project would be a better one if it confonned to the setback regutations and added that he would rather see the house where is-was proposed to be rather than take out additional trees.
J-J- asked why the house was sited where it was on parcel A to the west, and Kurt replied that they were trying to pick up views of Gore Range and down valley-and. that-trr6 aweiring ias broken up to help to reduce the massiveness of the proje6t.
J.J. stated that on Parcel B he saw plenty of room within the required setbacks.
curt said he courd not argue with the fact that one can fit
f something on the lot, but the trees were a najor concern. Jay \ added that on any given site one can build r,rii.lrout going into-setback areas, but it nay make an uninteresting town.J.J. pointed out that each tirne he had seen the PEC challenge an architect, the architect had been able to come up with a plan within the setbaclrs. He repeated the fact that the architect in this case had a clean piece of property. Jay answered that they had voluntarily torn down the existing structure and should be.given latitude to build, that they were being penalized for making a clean site.
Viele spoke in favor of the proposal as long as the buffer would rernain. Jay answered that there would be a deed restriction that only the Town of Vail could remove the buffer.
Parn Hopkins pointed out that another owner could hire Jay to ask to remove the buffer. She added that the FEC was going through this process because Parcel A trad to be a rninimurn iite.Jay said tbe purpose of the subdivision was to stop from having two old homes being added onto. He added that they knew they night have to ask for variances when they planned lhe subdivision.
(
Peter Patten felt that the naturar features should be preserwed within the 1.5 foot setback area and added that this was a self created hardship.
Jim Viere moved to approve the variance with the findings that the strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in.practicar difficulty or unnecessary physical trardship inconsistent with the obje-tives of the zone code. Ire specified that particul-ar attention be paid by the DRB of landscaping planned to be in the 3o foot buffer. Sid seconded the motion and the vote hras 4 in favor and 2 (JJ and Pan) against.
5.
Betsy Rosolack presented the proposal_, stating that the applicants wanted to build two 2-car garages ind additional square footage allowed under Ordinance 4 of 1985. The staff recommendation was for denial as it was felt the ad.ditions could be constructed within the setback areas.
Tom Briner, one of the architects on the project, spoke in favor_of the project and Dan Rickli, another-architect,explained that there seemed to be a discrepancy in the arnount of square footage that they were adding. ,lerry Lewis and. .fohn
A request for front, side, rear and stream setback
Yartances, a s+te co ss residential gloor arga ve_rianqe and a vafiange frgrn.iecrulrecl-landscaping in order to construct qdditions on parcels A
gnq_ g, rroE J, E rocr< r, vaf I vl,J.Iage !'].rst Fj-ling.Applicanq: Jerome A. LewLsf Downing Street Foundation
(
(
Kennerly, applicants, also spoke in favor of the project.Rickli fert that garages shourd not be counted. as- sile coverage if they were not counted as GRFA. He also proposed elirninatiig 4 parking spaces and decreasing the curb cuts fron 4 to 3.
Jirn viele asked Betsy if the staff had had tine to review the new proposal , and she replied that they had not.
craig snowdon, architect representing the adjacent neighbors to the west, Steve Berkowitz, read a letter lrom Berkoriitz objecting to the encroachments, stating that views would be negatively impacted.
J.J. felt it vas difficult to consider the proposal with a discrepancy in statistics. peggy Osterfoss-agieed and also felt concern for Berkowitz's views. Rickri disagreed that the additions would impact the views from the Berkowitz property.Peggy added tbat the burying of the garage was a ste| in trrl right direction, but she stated. that she would like to see fewer than 3 road cuts with more landscaping instead of asphalt. Diana agreed and added that hei miin concern was the stream setback.
sidts biggest concern was si-te coverage. He also felt there was too much asphart. Briner menti,oned that this was a DRB issue. Paur Hopkins abstained from comment because her firm was working on the Berkowitz proposal.
Jim viele stated that-when.a proposal contains so many variance requests, it is a good indication that too much is Ueing ;i;-;;on the site.
Jerry Lewis asked if he could tabre and peter answered that the item could be tabled-until 4/27 Lf the appricant could get revised figures and drawings,into the conrnunity Developient Departrnant by Wednesday morning, the 22nd.
Lewis requested to table to 4/27. Diana moved and sid seconded to tabre the request until April 27. The vote was 5-o-l_ (pam abstained fron voting. )
6. I TgElg:! to 3rnend spe topnenr pistrict No. 6,Vail Village Inn.
Tom Braun presented the amendment reguest and stated the staff reconmended denial, citing the need for additional parking,assurances the ski Museum would be relocated, and the nee6.'for accommodation units.
Jay Peterson' representing the applicant, remind.ed the board that twice tbe vail village rnn complex had submitted phased projects, but the potential developers couLd not fund the projects. Now ,Joe staufer wilr deirelop the new phases hinself.Jay explained the valet parking and stated that it was a ternporary measure until the next phase could be constructed. He stated that it was not econornical).y feasible for ffr. staufer to construct additional parking with this phase.
t
f Jay stated that the applicant vas willing to restrict the
\ dwelling units per the staff recommendation. Regarding the Ski Museum, Jay stated that 4,000 square feet of building could be given to the Town to use free of charge for any use the Town would want.
Pan asked if valet parking was planned for the conmercial areal and Jay replied that it was not. Joe Staufer stated that he had 3O - 50 parking spaces that are always empty. He added that the Sonnenalp, Plaza, and Bell Tower had alt expanded and
none had added any parking.
(
,fay then pointed out that there were no largie projects being constructed at this tine which were not phased.
Pam agreed with the parking, and felt that perhaps nore locais would be using this pqrking lot. Sid also did not have any problern with the parking and felt that to receive the 4,00b
sQluare feet of space in the building was better for the Town than for the Town to receive $L5,0OO to relocate the Ski l{useun. He did feel that the new residential units should be control]ed for public use. Diana felt the units need.ed to be available for rental . she felt that the ltuseum relocation rnust be worked out and rnust be a part of this amendment.
Joe Staufer felt that the town did not gain anything by rrlcicking the owner outtt especiarly if the ownei wanted-to be in Vail for two months in the surnmer. Mr. Staufer suggested. that the unit be available for rental and not be the priroary residence of the ordner.
Diana stated that she did not patronize many of the stores in the vail vi1-rage rnn cornprex because she did not have any place to park. Diana asked for a commitment to finish the fuilOing as proposed. Howeverf she sti1l felt that there would be a parking problem. Jay said that for the parking to work, all the phases must be done.
Peggy osterfoss fert that the proposar shourd include assurance that the developer will relocate the ski Museum and relandscape because a land.scaped area was being rernoved in the proposal .Jay replied that with the new proposal , the Town of vail would end up with a large chunk of real- estate. He added ttrat the applicant was willing to participate in redoing the intersection. Peggy stated that she did not wait to see the landscaping issue tost in the shuffle, and felt the responsibility rested with the developer.
More discussion followed concerning parking. peter pointed out that parking spaces under the condos were iontrolled by a gate and were under utilized. Tom fel-t thaL it was the reslonsilit-ity of the developer to provlde parking on the site. 1..r.referred to the memo which indicated a shortfall of 100 spaces.He was tord 188 of the spaces were required to be valet and he t
(
wondered how the decision was made to have LBE of the spaces be valet. Ton replied that it varied with use. He added that phases I and II contained 22,000 square feet and phase III contained 10,000 square feet with no parking provided. He added that he felt it was the repsponsibility of the developer to provide parking on the site.
Joe Stauffer said he would like to be able to pay into the parking fund as did businesses in Comrnercial Core I and. II.J.J. suggested that perhaps Staufer could pay the Town for parking at building perrnit tirne and the Town could repay Staufer when his parking was cornpl-ete.
The Ski Museum was discussed. Tom stated that at present the anended SDD did not address the needs of the Ski Museun. Jay pointed out that the space offered to the Town was worth g1 Million. J.J. said it seemed like an opportunity for the Town,the space couLd be sold for a substantial amount of cash. Tom pointed out that one condition was that it be used for the public. .Jay stated that they were willing to renove that stipulation.
J.J. felt the key issue of the owner/rental question was occu,pancy and this issue was di-scussed. Also discussed was the deletion of landscaping for parking. saundra smith stated that they were willing to remove two parking spaces and place landscaping in place of the spaces.
Peter felt to approve the proposed shortfall of parking would be inconsistent. He pointed out that the Westin was not able tg 9o any more construction until the parking structure was finished. He stated that the plaza and Ael1-fohrer were different, in that they were i.n a pedestrian area and paid into the parkJ-ng fund. lle pointed out that the proposal un-der construction was adjacent to the 4-way stop wilh vehicle access and must lrave on-site parking.
J.J. discussed the parking figures. Joe Staufer proposed to make the dwelling units be available for rentar wnen they were unoccupied.
Sid Schultz moved and J.J. Collins seconded to approve the arnendments to SDD 6 as subrnitted with the following conditioins:
1. fhe use of the unj-ts be restricted to non-primary residence and be part of a rental pool .
2. fhe applicant shall participate in and not remonstrate against a special improvement district for the intersection of Vail Road and Meadow Drive.
3.
The vote was 5-L in favor.L
(
(
A
a
?.
J.J. left at this point.
est for setback variances order to construct 1n
ons to the at Lot 2 Block Vai.l villa
cants:Howard, Jud and Steven Berkowitz
Tom Braun showed an inprovement survey and explained the request. Gary Walker, representing the applicant, stated that the rnain reason for the location of the garage was to have access to an existing driveway and parking ii front of the garage.
Diana Donovan moved and pam Hopkins seconded to approve the request per the staff nemo. The vote was 5-0 in favor.
A est to anend the zon code in order to add a ner^t zone distr ent ed rrHills de Residentia
This itern was tabled.
Ric\ Pylraan showed a site plan and explained the proposal ,adding that the staff reconmendation was for approval . Craig Snowdon, architect for the project, explained the plans. pegSy
Osterfoss suggested the deck be only over the garage, and Craig said he would reduce the deck.
Diana moved and Peggy seconded to approve ttre reguest per the staff memo. Ttre vote was 4 - 0 - 1 abstention (pan).
8. A feouest for a side setkrack rrari enr''re in rlr.r:l ar l.n
9.
A reguesE for a side setback variance in order to construct a qaracle at 325 Forest Road.
4pplicant: Tin Drisko
L
o
Project Application
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
contact person and rn""" DauB lrfblf t$A- }'t(D.
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
I
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
fn'^
Design Review Board
Motion by:
o*" }/)Q6-lf
DISAPPROVAL
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
j
tr
lr',!! \';
Town Planner
,l]+
J..\
Date:
lr
E star Approval
lnwn
75 south lrontsge road
vall, colorado 81657
(3O3) 476-7OOO
July 2L, 1988
ilr. Dave Mott
General Manager
Upper Eagle Valley Consol"idated
Water and Sanitation Districts
846 Forest Road vail, co 8l-657
Re: Gaging Station
Dear Dave:
On JuIy 20, L988, the Design Review Board gave final approval to your reguest to locate a gaging station to the south of the existing Upper Eagle Valley facLlity. The approval was given h'ith the following conditionsl
L. A landowner's letter of approval rnust be submitted.before construction begins.
2. The Town of Vail bike path must be repaired inrnediately after construqtion.
3. The gage station will be painted forest green.
4. the gage statLon must be a minimurn of four feet frorn . the edge of the asphalt for the bi-ke path. The Town
wouLd like to see as much separation as possible
between the bike path and the station.
5. Please have your construction manager check with Public Works before the construction of the station actually begins. Please talk to pete Burnett at 476-7000 ext. 25O.
If any have any further guestions, please feel free to give rne
a call. Thanks for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
i/^ I n. I
ltifino rrffr
Kristan Pritz Senior Planner
KP: kc
J o .7 UPPER EAGLE VALLEY
o
Cottsotrol
I
WATER AND SAN ITATION DISTRICTS
846 FOREST ROAD . VAIL. COLORADO 41657
(303) 476.7480
, 1', I
a'
July 1, 1988
Peter Patton, Director
Vail Communi ty Development
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: GORE CREEK GAGING STATION
Dear Mr. Patton:
In cooperation with the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District, the U. S.
Geological Survey, Department of Interior plans to install a gaging station just
west of the Forest Road bridge sometime in August. I am writing you to advise you of
the project and inquire as to what approvals are required, if any, by the town.
The instrumentation will be located inside the Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated
Sanitation District's Vail wastewater treatment plant. A small buried air line in
1 1/2" conduit will sense creek level as shown on the attached sketch. The only
visible mechanism will be a ttcantilever gaget' which is necessary for calibration.
This is also shown on the attached sketch and in a photograph of another
instal l ation.
Please advise.
Sincerely,
VA,{L V&LEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
M'%.7
David E. Mott
General Manager
DEM: ikl .84
At tac hment
ll .-'\
A ll PaRTrcrparrNc DrsrRrgrs - ARRgwHEAo METRo warER . avoN METRo wATER . BEAVER cREEK METRo warER . BERRy cREEK ug.,ao /' CLEAN \
O\ wArER ' EAGLE-va'iLMErRowarERv';'J::nJiJ:r;#::'iil,r';:il1r::'i":,:fi:"EAGLEVALLE'saNrrArtoN ' u^''- @f
f-
l aa
;74 rg
t-rr3-D (Mrrrb l9te)
8L6L! forE- I)o.rbh O':':'"'^':^:-+:igl#Sff*f,':"'o" Fitz
l Go,--C"sek -tJ -TteatmoaL Plaat --l- -l/-aiL - e e/-..-
t,J"+i""i bllg:
l..o.rD-'e^c'a:tar
I
I -t-
I -, lo" o/ rrJ"rorounJ llJr.f- sr d-.- - 4
I
Jtz- U S 63
.canlileter
Creet
Plan
czle l"
.ust'5 a.i 12. l'ne
::\
masph"lt
f,;l<c'patA.,^J.'g'ounJ Ud3-
8"x'
fl"", llatec
I'hrJ lolarS.-ro,L
scale l'.4'
ro(0
cPo a30-s5t
o
Consouolreo UPPER EAGLE VATLEY
WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICTS
846 FOREST ROAD . vAlL. COLORADO 81657
(303) 476,7480
August 9,1988
Kristan Pritz
VAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: GORE CREEK GAGING STATI0N, FOREST ROAD
Dear Kr istan:
Attached please find a copy of a letter from Vail Associates, dated Awust 5,
1988, granting permission to cross their property with an underground sensing line in
conjunction with the above gaging station. This is intended to satisfy condition
Number I of your letter dated July 21, 1988.
Should you have any questions, please call
Sincerely,
VAIL VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
| '/ /--''' ''dra I - David E. Mott
General Manager
DEM: ikl 5,49
Attachment
.ll --\
A II PARTICIPATING DISiTRICTS - ARROWHEAO METRO WATER . AVON ETRO WATER . BEAVER CREEK i'ETRO WATER . BERRY CREEK y,ETAO /' CLEAN \
a\ wArER ' EAGLE-'A'|L uErRo wArERv';"J::nJiJ::; ffi:'."":,TTH"^l:'"i;:J,fi"'"'LE vaLLEy saNtra'oN ' vArL @
\hilAssociafeqLrc.
Creators and Operaton of Vail and Beaver Creeko
SITE OF THE 1989 WORLD ALPINE SKI CHAMPIONSHIPS
August 5, 1988
Mr. David Mott Vail Valley Consolidated V{ater District 846 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Dave,
The purpose of this letter is to give VaiI Associates consent to the water district to dig a trench and place equipment assoeiated with a stream guage on Vail Associates
owned property located to the west of the Forest Road bridge and to the south of the sewer plant.
Please call if you have any questions, or need additional information. Obtaining permits and approvals from 1ocal,state or federal regulatory agencies is.the water dj.strict,s responsibility.
Sincerely,
/'7 ,/./ , -tfz-2./47
/ toe uaey /
Manager
Mountain Planning
JvL/kL
cc: Larry Lichliter
Pct Office Box 7 . Vail, C-olorado 81658'USA - (loi) 476-5601 .-IElex: 910.920-3183
''.r
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Conlact Person and
Prolect Application
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Comments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
1,*r,, r" X=j
[own Planner ', ls , l<f h.ro.X.""
Approval
Project Appllcation
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
Commenls:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
lTown Planner ,l ,l 7 Staff Approval
j
.?
-.4
:t g7r
,l \l
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .Jr
k-,rl
F-,e4
r,-
11
rt.-J
';.J-
J
t (vt
_-!
.J
\c
{I .3
R\
\
-e I 3
{.-Y
.e s3
d .?t-..d rt tJ_ .;.:
\
'I
+t,_l
: :-'i
\€ J tr-{?3 s Q, \,?
:-oo-C ,r t<.i I ..d
J j+ {3d s
:5 €o
J
75 south frontage road
vall, colorado 81657
(3031 476-7OOO
July 21, 1988
Mr. Dave Mott
General ltanager
Upper Eagle Va11ey Consolidated I{ater and Sanitation Districts
846 Forest Road
Vail , CO 8L657
Re: Gaging Station
Dear Dave:
On July to your existing with the
20, l-988, the Design Review Board gave final approval request to locate a gaging station to the south of the
Upper Eagle Va1ley facility. The approval was given following conditions:
1. A landowner's letter of approval must be subnitted before construction begins.
2. The Toern of VaiI bike path rnust be repaired
irnrnediately after construction.
3. The gage station will be painted forest green.
4. The gage station must be a minimum of four feet from the edge of the asphalt for the bike path. The Toern would like to see as much separation as possible
between the bike path and the station.
5. Please have your construction manager check with Public Works before the construction of the station actually begins. Please talk to pete Burnett at
476-7OOO ext. 25O.
Gli
I t
If any have any a caII. Thanks
Sincerely,
i r- I O, l -(htho YrfB-I rr.v.v. ' ,..tL
Kristan Pritz
Senior Planner
KP:Kc
further questions, please feel for your cooperation.
free to give me
uppen EAGLE VALLEY cOXSOLrOereO
WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICTS
846 FOREST ROAD . VAIL COLORADO 81657
(303) 476 7480
l.lovqrb€r 23, 1987
Kristan Pritz
Tohn Plann€r
TCf{f,l OF VAIL
75 Soufi Frontage Road
Vai1, Oolorado 81657
RE: Int€rgovermpnta'l Agreenent with tpper Eagle Valley Oonsolidated
Sanitation District ( "IEVCSD" ) and
Vail Va]]ey Oonsolidated hlater District ("WC[ID")
Dear Kristan:
Erc'lced you will find three (3) copies of the agreenent betr€1 the Tosr of Vail
ard tJre TEVCSD ad WqD regarding the rutual uaiving of certain fea. Both districts
fave sigred, with Ed Drager being the Bmrd Chainrtan in ach case.
P'lease have Ron Phi1 1ips execut€ the agreannnt and return one origina'l to the District.
I an truly pleased that our Boards are rrcrking together mrtually to the extslt
they better serve the tax payer.
o
./
Sincerely,
T..PPEJL{AGI_E VALLEY @f,TSOLIDATED SA |TTATTON DISTRTCT
VAIL V4LLEY MNSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
/".''i,/rzah David E. tbtt-
Ggpral l,lanager
DEI{:&s.93
Enclosures
r\\ paRTrcrparr'G orsrRrcrg - aRRowHEAo METR. warER . avoN METRo wayER . BEAVER .REEK METR. warER . BERR' .REEK "at"o ZG\
O\ warER o EAGLE va'|L uErRo warER '.':y::'#fi::: il'.:"iil,rTH"":::':;s;:" *"LE vaLLEy saN'|ra'oN ' u^'' QGI
- $v
'rt-i6,t-
],',' -.+ r'. t-^ '. .
( !ilJ,
'',,
(l
tL lil
the UPPER EAGLE
and the VAIL
between
the TOWN 0F VAIL,
VALLEY CONSOLIDATED SANITATION OISTRICT
VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
, 1987, by and between the TOWN 0F VAIL, a Colorado municipal
corporation ("the Town"), the UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED SANITATI0N DISTRICT,
a quasi-governmental entity ("Sanjtation Djstrict") and the VAIL VALLEY
CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental entity ("Water
Di stri ct" ) .
REC I TALS
1. The Town, the Water District and the Sanitatjon Djstrjct wish to contract
together to provide for the waiver of ce'rtain fees between the Town and the
Di stri cts.
2. This Intergovernmental Agreement is authorized pursuant to Section 18,
Article XIV of the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-L-201, et seq., C.R.S., as
amended.
NOt,l, THEREFORE, in consideration
promises contained herein, the parties
1. The Town shall wajve during
Distri ct and Sanitation Djstrict, the
A. Street cuts.
B. Recreation amenities.
C. Clean up.
D. Bui lding permit.
of the mutual covenants, conditjons and
hereby agree as follows:
the term of this Agreement, for the l,laten
following fees and costs:
f.-Trez=G:zE4=-
H-
permi t.
L. A. Electrical permit.
q ?F . Mechan'ical permi t.
,\ 4 0' [tPt'tr- Pl'*t B'"d-
'',"i b. ;,?rl' Ppt'io7;"-t | ^ ^t', i',Mnd (nu trnrw&oJl h'uuat'n"
2. The Water District and Sanitation DistrjcUagree to pay the Town's direct
expenses fcr= ar At&{ reviews. 4S PEf- 9k.3o9G)dE 0'6.C' At-tp ?/zc 4cto-Pz7 ut7t1 c44/7EZ 3 ac <l.Bz. aC Affllc.tr^N 3. The Water District and Sanitation District shalI waive all tap fees for
t. Plumbing permit.
projects on Town of Vail property. These tap fees shall include irrigation tap A"i,
fees, sewer tap fees and water tap fees. I
4. Terminati on
Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Agreement shall be
effecti ve and shall terminate
%4
A,
z
.^J :v
Notwithstanding the foregoing provision, ejther party with or without cause may
terninate this Agreement upon the giving of one hundred eighty (180) days prior
written notjce of such termination to the other respective parties. Notice shall
be deemed to have been given upon the mailing of said notice by United States
certified first class mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the parties at the
respective addresses as shall appear herein or upon a change of address pursuant
this notice provision. It is the intent of the respective parties that this
Agreement shall be renewed for additional peri ods following the end of the jnjtjal
period, and unless one of the parties gives notice to the other parties at least
one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the end of the initial period that such
party desires to termjnate thjs Agreement or to renegotiate the terms, this
Agreement shall be automatjcal1y extended for an additjonal period of
each not to exceed a total of two (2) such extensions.
ffi
ffi,i-
to
-2-
5. This Agreement does not and shall not be deemed to confer upon a grant to
any third party any right to clajm damages or to bring any lawsuit, action or other
proceedings against either the Town of the Districts because of any breech hereof
or because of any terms, covenants, agreements or conditions contained herejn,
6. No modifjcation or waiver of this Agreement or of any covening condjtion
or provision herein contained shall be valjd unless in writing and duly executed by
the party to be charged.
7. This written Agreement embodies the whole Agreement between the parties
and there are no jnducements, promises, terms, conditions, or other obligations
made or entered into either by the Town or the Djstrjcts other than those contained
herein.
8. This Agreement shall be binding upon the respective parties, their
successors or assigns, and may not be assigned by anyone without the prior written
consent of the other partjes hereto.
9. The Town has represented to the Districts and likewise, the Districts
have represented to the Town that they possess the legal ability to enter into this
Agreement. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any
of the parties hereto did not possess the 1ega1 ability to enteri nto this
Agreement, this Agreement shall be considered null and void as of the date of such
court determination.
-3-
By:By:
By:
IN WITNESS I,IHEREOF, the parties
and year first written above.
TOI{N OF VAIL
Rondal 1 V. Phillips, Town Manager
VAIL VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER
DISTRICT
hereto have executed this Agreement the day
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED
SANITATION DISTRICT
-4-
I
75 loulh lronhgo road
vall, colorado E1657
(303) 476-7000 olflco of conmunlty dcvclopmonl
Novmeber 5, L9A7
Mr. Dave Mott
Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation and water Districts 846 Foregt Road VaiI, Colorado 81557
Dear Dave,
llere is the intergovernnental agreement. This will be reviewed at a Council work session at 2:OO p!! on Tuesday, Novenber LO.
l,/ r "n I
llll\l/lll^ .lvl I f -1" r ?--
Tonn Planner
TO: Ron Phillips
FRoM: Peter Paftegff
DATE: October 2, L987
SU&TECT: VaiI Valley Consolidated Water Districtrs Surplus
Properties
The attached letter from Dave Mott identifies two properties
which the District is intending to dispose. we felt it would be prudent to allow the Council to review these properties for
any potential public use. Kristan and I have visited the sites
and cannot think of any reason that we would want to obtain either parcel for public purposes. The VMRD may be interested in a portion of the Village parcel to locate restrooms for the golf course.
Please schedule this for an appropriate Council work session,
and I will inform Dave.
iz UppER EaclE Vlr-r-Ev
WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICTS
846 fOR€Sr ROAo . VArL COLORAOO 8t557
{303) 476 7480
Septenber 18, 1987
Peter Patton
Director L'.fl Connrxli 1y Developxnent
Town of VaiI
?5 South Frontage Road West
VaiI , Colorado 81657
RE: Site Inspection
VaiI Valley Consolidated Water District
Surplus Properties
Dear Peter:
Prease be advised the VaiL Valrey consor idated water District has deterrnined that the below ]isted properties are surprus to their needs and intends to dispose of them at fair nrarket value (plat maps are attached l:
\
Gore Creek Water Treatment PLant.7th Filing
Lionsridge Water lbeatment Plant.
Subdivision
Ttsact C, VaiI Village,
Block D, Lionsridge
Bet ore underta.king a formar zone change proceeding r would rike your
feedback as to what pubric uses might. be planned for tf,ese properties ard whether the public sector wourd be interested i.n thei,r acquisition. r wirr appreciate your input.
Sincerely ,
David E. Mott
General- Manager
/,,v /-/zd /-
VALLEY CONSOLIDATD SANITATIOT.I DISTRICII
DEM:das
TOV
Eoclosures
xc: Bob Ruder
\\
I\\ Paattcrtatr'rc Drs?erctlr - AARowBgAo METRo wATER . avoN MErRo wATER . B€AyER CREEK MerRo wArER . BERRV 6REEK METR. waraa ,ff\
O\
EAGLE va'L ME'A. wArER ' EowAFos ^'t':::::'"Iff::,fiitrff;'J1::.;:?;;,T;X"^.".y coNsoLtoAreu sAN''A.oN
@
o
lRlC t ar1
*'.t\
' i /.'i,
/,
f
:i-; .a':.'+ /
"..l.d z
')'"c;. "v
/!
,r Io5 I
;-r'o'
A d joining
,' 2tol- 06
IGE
r5h
@
@
BROOKTREE '..:
TQWNHOUS ES
i/
:-/
/ tt
.'t
/i
A-J
r/i ,/".lt
:"'/+
I
>t'l
a
c
q,q
qt5 l:.
tl
.l
I
lf'
i
;.
i
a
I
'{-
\
-:l
;,\-q SANOSTONE 7O
taAcl A
@@
;!r
a
t:
/ ,' /.'
3 /' yPd '., Y"
/'n
/.:
"1
.r/
.",: /,*:' ,/ i
.d .r"
t.. .o' I
J@ J
i.ai-ocr "u'
t, 'uu o,o.
:lo4l ;
61 l- 5
( sANDsroNE cREEK cLUB )
)'.
!/.
045- 065
7 /:."
a/,y
ffi
*4ii6 ';t
r'---@ '\rA '>\,} I \-'/
-.- --1-1 ,,o.../.. (o2 6:64
ir ;l
90q
@
\q t I ,,X, l
' s\!\i
y \.r
----.=\I
I
{t]o !q
:14
\-i
.\
R \
v
^:-
^1t
:,.;.:.
Iv
!s
.r)
'..q
l\<t
N
=rt
'rY
i€I s\:r{
n*
{;
ia sr
tq
t,a a
,
75 south lrontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
olf ice of lhe town manager
September 4, L987
Board of Directors Vail Valley Consolj_dated Water District 846 Forest Road VaiJ-, colorado 81657
Dear Board of Directors:
on behalf of the Town of vail , r wourd like to thank you for waiving-water tap fees for Buffehr creek park, nighori park,and sandstone park. The irrigation tap fee for euffenr creek park would have cost the Tolsn 914,500. Both sandstone and Bighorn Parks required a 3/4r water service rine at s5,76o per
]ine. rn total, the Board saved the Town of Vail a totar of 126'o2o for water tap fees. This considerable amount of savings will enable the Town to spend additional money on Iandscaping and facility improvernents which will be gieatly appreciated by the geneial public.
The Town of VaiI would like to continue to work in a cooperative manner with the vail varley consoridated water Board. The Board has expressed an intlrest in forrnalizing a cooperative policy between the Town of vair and the vair iairey consoridated water District. r believe tnat che-t".t approach is to schedule a di-scussion with the Town councit at an upcorning work session. r would like to inviie nave Mott ana the mernbers of the Board to attend a Town council work session on. september 15th. r will be calling Dave to confirm this qaEe.
rn addition, the Board expressed interest in d.iscussing the core creek treatment plant and Lionsri-dge treatrnent plint sites. Kristan pritz will contact Dave Mott to arrange a rneeting between the water oistrict and planning o-partment. we are interested in working with you on alternative lub1ic uses for the two sites.
Itli
,
Vail Vallley Consolidated water District August 31, L9A7
Page Two
once again,
cooperation
appreciated.
we would like to thank on the tap fees. Your
the Board for their efforts are greatly
Rondall V. Philli
Town Manager
RVP:bpr
/
f
a
75 south lronlage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 4792'138
(303) 479-2139
office ot communlty developmenl
October 29, 1990
ltr. Jerry Bender
Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation District
845 Forest Rd.
Vail , CO 81658
RE: water Tank in East Vail
Dear Jerry,
I am writing in regard to the current status of the proposed
rnitigation for the East Vail water tank which is located in the
vail ueadows Avalanche Path. Due to the location of the tank,
ttre Town is very concerned with both the scheduling and type of
nitigation which lrill be installed. we would like to have the
opportunity to review the proposal when it becornes available. we
would like to insure that the mitigation is cornpleted as soon as
possible.
According to our records the water tank is partially located in
the Town of Vail , it will therefore be necessary that any
proposed nitigation located within Town boundaries be reviewed by
The Townrs Design Review Board for aesthetic iropacts and by Greg
Hall, Town Engineer. It will also be neccessary for the district
to neet the Townrs requirenents for developnent in a hazard area.
P1ease contact nre should you have any new inforrnation available.
Thank you,
Shel1y Mello,
Town Planner
,'i1 t
[:f!-f tilFi'
Present
Greg Amsden
Chuck Gist
Diana Donovan
Ludwig Kurz
Kathy Langenwalter
Dalton Williams
Gena Whinen
PLANNING AND E}.IVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
March 9,1992
Staff
Kristan Pritz
Mike Mollica
Jill Kammerer
Andy Knudtsen
Shelly Mello
Amber Blecker
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Diana Donovan at l:05PM.
l. A request for a worksession for a minor subdivision and a zone district change from
Primarv/Secondarv Residential to Low Densiw Multiple Familv. for the Schmetzko
oropertv. generallv located at 2239 Chamonix Lane. more particularlv described as:
Parcel A: A tract of land conraining one acre, more or less, located in the South l/2
of the South East ll4 of Section ll, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian, rnore particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the NE corner of the SW ll4 of the SE l/4 of said Section 11; thence
westerly along the northerly line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 bearing south 86 20' W
a distance of 167.80 ft. to a point:
Thence southerly along a line 167.80 ft. distant from and parallel to the east line of
said SW l/4 of the SE 1/4, a distance of 200.00 ft. to a point:
Thence easterly a distance of 167.80 ft. along a line 200.00 ft. distant from and
parallel to the north line of said SW l/4 of the SE l/4 to a point on its east line;
Thence easterly on a line parallel to the north line of the SW l/4 of the SE 1/4 of
Section 11, a distance of 50.95 ft. to a point:
Thence northerly and parallel with the west line of the east ll2 of the SE 1/4 of said
Section 11, a distance of 200.00 ft. to the point of intersection with the extension of
the north line of thc SW l/4 of the SE l/4 of said Section ll;
Thence westerly on a deflective angle left of 95 21'00" along the extension of the
north line of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1i4 of said Section 11, a distance of 50.95 ft. to
the NE comerof the SW 1/4 of the SE l/4 of Section 11, being the point of
beginning.
Planning and Environmental Commission . March 9, 1992'Page I
f
Parcel B: Tract A, Vail Heights Filing No. 1 according to the recorded plat thereof.
Applicant Erich Schmetzko
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen explained the request and issues surounding the proposal.
Chuck Crist asked why the Land Use Plan called out this area as Medium Density
Residential. Kristan Pria said MDR was a general range of 3-14 units, and was used as a
guide. Greg Amsden asked if the Commission should then give the applicant a development
range.
Rick Rosen, representing tlrc applicant, said they wanted to obtain approval for as many units
as possible. He said the hazard mitigation plans were still being worked upon, and that he
would like to see direction from the Commission on the maximum number of units which
would be approved.
Greg asked for a history of the parcel. Rick responded that when Mr. Schmetzko purchased
the property, it was not yet annexed into the Town of Vail. At that time, he believed it was
zoned for 5 units by the County. When the Town annexed the area, he believed the owner
was given no notice that the Town was going to down-zone the propeny. At this point, Mr.
Schmetzko wished to rezone the property and replat it into one parcel for continuous access.
Diana Donovan indicated that how the County had zoned the property was not the issue. She
indicated she could only support increasing the density of the property if sufficient mitigation
was performed. She believed it was unbuildable without mitigation. In addition, she felt it
was critical that the mitigation be performed on the property, not off-site, as there would be
too much scaring if the mitigation went back into the BLM lands. She challenged the owner
to address the aesthetic cory)erns of the mitigation.
Kathy Langenwalter was not comfortable rezoning the property. She thought a Special
Development District would be more appropriate. She was leery of giving the parcel a new
zoning, then having it sold. Since the mitigation was critical to the proposal, she wanted
more development controls placed on the property than just zoning. Diana agreed, but
suggested placing plat restrictions on the parcels. Kathy did not believe that would be enough
control, as the mitigation was part of the design process. Andy indicated that standards for
the mitigation construction could be placed on the plat.
Kathy believed the rezoning request would be easier to support if it was known who would
develop the properry. Rick replied that if the property was restricted through use of the plat,
the developer would still be required to go through the planning process. If a site-specific
request were approved, it would be difficult for Mr. Schmetzko to sell the property, as it
would limit the use and value of the land. Kathy reiterated that the site is very sensitive, and
she did not believe a plat restriction would sufficiently protect the character of the area.
Planning and Environmental Commission . March 9, 1992 . Page 2