The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB120362EnwvAl Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Fond, Vail, Colorado 8 1657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479. 2452 Grob: www.vailgov.com Project Name: PETERSON SITE WALL RECONSTRUCT DRB Number: DRB120362 Project Description: RECONSTRUCTION OF DRY STACK SITE WALLS. Participants: OWNER MARK R PETERSON TRUST 08/13/2012 324 DAKOTA DUNES BLVD 200 DAKOTA DUNES SD 57049 CONTRACTOR LAND DESIGNS BY ELLISON, INC 08/13/2012 Phone: 970 - 328 -6080 PO BOX 2134 EAGLE CO 81631 License: 130 -S APPLICANT MARK R PETERSON TRUST 08/13/2012 324 DAKOTA DUNES BLVD 200 DAKOTA DUNES SD 57049 Project Address: 1687 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL Location: Legal Description: Lot: 2 Block: Subdivision: ELENI ZNEIMER SUBDIVISIO Parcel Number: 2103 - 122 - 1500 -2 Comments: See conditions BOARD /STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPP Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: 08/15/2012 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and /or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 (PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12 -3 -3: APPEALS. Cond:202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0012730 The applicant shall reconstruct the retaining walls in the exact locaton of the existing walls with the existing stone and heights not to exceed five feet from grade. Planner: Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF MAIL' Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 -479 -2128 www.valigov.com Development Review Coordinator Application for Design Review Minor Exterior Alteration General Information: This application is required for all proposals involving minor changes to buildings and site improve- ments, such as roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences, retaining walls, etc. Applicable Vail Town Code sections can be found at www.vailgov.com under Vail Information — Town Code Online. All projects requiring de- sign review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, as outlined in the submittal requirements. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and /or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building per- mit is issued and construction commences. Fee: $250 for Multi - Family /Commercial $20 for Single Family /Duplex Single Family �L Duplex Multi- Family El Commercial Description of the Request: Reconstruction of drystack site walls per drawing LC1.0 eXA_r —( - �fo no_ o Dle LAC; Physical Address: 1687 Buffehr Creek Rd Parcel Number. . (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970 - 328 -8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: Mark R. Peterson Trust Mailing Address: 324 Dakota Dunes BLVD 200 Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 Phone: Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: Paul Heding (Ceres+ Landscape Architecture) Mailing Address: PO Box 2134 Eagle, CO 81631 E -Mail: paul @ceres - plus.com Phone: 970 -904 -0052 Fax: 970 - 328 -6084 H 1 .S3 TOWN OF VAIL For Office Use Only: 13a Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Exp. Date: Auth # Check # Fee Paid: SaLo.00 Received From: eee'e—S LU s LLC Meeting Date�:� DRB No.: bRR-)a03(o� " Planner: (/�� -� Project No: J?i S1 I' Day I Zoning: Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: Block: Subdivision: '" e,t;e��"`Cf` —I ---------------------------- --- -------------- ----------- AM AM RT RT AM RT RT AM RT F1 PRESERVE EXISTING DRY-5TREAM A5 P0551BLE REMOVE AND REPLACE 5TONE AFTER COMPLETION OF WALL WORK A5 NEEDED PRESERVE EX15TINC-7 LAN05GAPE A5 POSSIBLE (HATCHED) REMOVE AND STORE 5HURB51TREE5 FOR REPLANTING AFTER COMPLETION OF WALL WORK A5 NEEDED 0 U -- KAFF: ■ PROPERTY LINE EDGE OF AS�PHALT N6703q,3711H V/ A ` � - I'll G ftec h H E PWO RTH - PAW L A K G Ff ) PEC H N i C A L August % 2012 Ccres+Landseapc Architecturc Attn: Paul Heding P. 0. Box 2134 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Job No. 108 529B subjleet: Recommendations for Design of Block Site Retaining Walls, Existing Residence. Lot 2, Filing 1, Elcm Zneiner Subdivision, 1687 Buffetir Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Paul: As requested, Are arc providing recorrarncndatjons for block site retaining walls at the subject site. The: services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional services to Ccres+Landscape Architecture dated, July 13, 2012. The findings of our recommendations for the design are presented in this teport. The site retaining walls will replace existing stacked tack walls at the site that have failed. It is desired to replace the wralls with gravity concrete blocks walls and place the architectural rock on the front side of the blocks, The was will reportedly be a maximum of 4�4 feet in height above the ground surface. Pre-cast (solid) concrete blocks 6 feet king by 2 feet high by 2 feet deep and weighing about 4,00 lbs. each are desired as the blocks. 14epworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Previously observed a portion orthe excavation for the residence at the site when under construction and submitted our findings in a report dated September 22, 2008, Job No. 108 529A, The -roils Consisted of rilediarn dense, silty ,sandy gravel with cobbles. No free water was observed at the tinge of the excavation. Based on our analysis and experience, the proposed pre east block walls placed c to height of 4% feet will be marginally stable due excessive, tot pressure at the base of the Wall. We recommend goo-grid reinforced backfill lx-hind the walls be used to increase the wall stability. A gco-grid reinforced wall to about 5 feet tall is feasible with the limited recommended geo-grid backfill reinforcement. The geo-grid should consist of a uniaxial material such as Tonsar UIX 1000 or equivalent. The geo-grid should be placed bet-ween, each layer of blocks and extend a length of at least 2 feet behind the walls. The wall and geo-grid backfill can consist of the on-site soils compacted to at least 95% standard Proctor density at It moisture content near optimum. cl 9 ,, i" "� - �1'4! � I � . 3k'f 3A 574 046'17" 01 U-1 LU X V LU 2- 0 2'X2'Xb'GONORETE BLOCK5 – ON51TE 5011-5 COMPACTED TO 615% – 5PO BEHIND KALL5 U5E EX15TIN6 51TE STONE To – FACE CONCRETE BLOCK. SECURE WITH HIDDEN MORTAR A5 NEEDED UXIOOO TEN5AR. EXTEND MIN. 2' – BEHIND 13LOGK 1211 MIRAFI 14ON FILTER FA13RIG – DRAIN GRAVE. 2" MAX 51ZE > 50% – RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE AND <2% PA55IN6 NO. 200 51EVE 4" DIA. PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE – 5LOPED TO OUTLET Ceres +Undscape Architecture August 9, 2012 Page 2 A typical detail for single tier wall using 2 feet deep concrete blacks up to 5 feet tall with 2 fleet of geo-grid reinforced backfill is provided on Figure 1. The walls should bear oil a minimum 6 inches orC'DOT Class 6 base course and be embedded a minimum 12 inches below the ground surface, The base course should be compacted to at least 95% standard Proctor density (ASTM D698) at a moisture content near optintum. Prior to the base course placement, the subgrade should be moistened and compacted. A drain should be provided behind the walls and consist of a 4 inch diameter perforated pipe placed near the bottom of the wall surrounded by drain gravel, The drain gravel should be covered by filter fabric such as Mirari 140N. If wall heights and are taller from those we have assumed, we sboukl be contacted to review our design recommendations. Sonic field niodifications to the wall design may be needed. We should observe the subgrade conditions below the walls, and test compaction of the base course below the walls and tile wall backfill on a regular basis during construction, If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office Sincerely, HEPWORTH_:-WLAK GEOTUCHNICAL, INC. David A. Young, I)II, DAY/ksw 10 ;;h attachment Figure 1, Ni"m Job N(x 108 5298 GoiWtech I,(+/) 1.- 21 '+/-) I I FINISHED GRADE 14 '14 4 4' 4A 4 GRADE FIN15HED — 4 4 11' =1' -011 AUG 13 ZUV TOWN OF VAIL V, z co u1i 0 0 f k LJLJ 777 7-- C)� 00 13� U w r. 4 A 0• A C> A 4. .4 Co 7 C> A 11R .......... A W. 7 A 41- .4 4 4 4 �A A W CL .'4 - ------ - cc 'A 0 'A A. 'A A. 0 A -------- 4 A 4 d .4 0 C1 U 4 A di A 4 4 4 dd 4 • 4 — i -:7! 7711 ri i 1=1 :, A 46 A A A A 4 01 01 0), .�4 4 A -A co J J 4 1 -A. A A A d 4 . A a4 J, I • A A, 4J W 2 14 '14 4 4' 4A 4 GRADE FIN15HED — 4 4 11' =1' -011 AUG 13 ZUV TOWN OF VAIL LU V, z co u1i 0 0 LJLJ 0 < —i C)� 00 13� U C14 r. 0• + C> Co C> 11R W. CD W CL cc W 0 IL 0 0 C1 U z di 0), co 4J W 2 LU U z u1i 0 0 LJLJ 0 < —i C)� 00 13� U 24 MAY 2011 7 JULY 2011 DRB SUBMITTAL 12 AUGUST 2012 DRB SUBMITTAL Title: WALL REPAIR PLAN Scale: Y8 to = 1 14011 Sheet: LC 1 ■ ceres plus, LLC. 2011