HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIONS RIDGE FILING 2 PHASE 2 TRACT B UNITS 1A-4B-3 LEGAL\J"F-+\.-t-.
>-T
\-aotrn
Ifi
_l
F\g
-n
I tl
@
6
@
Al€.trt
H
j
trt
tt
H
r,{Ho
Pt"l
Hoz
I
Flo€z
.o
'q
H
Ei
oo
5
gI
t-t
€
trt
},
Prd{tr|trtHoot,
'd4HUOnzt!
=r{trtot{trF3HH<zvtOU
cz
13H|lFtr
1.1
',@tslFDIrd
Ftlr{FIOHcoHYFE
IEE:*r-,- I12.IlrrlH lroFr::,EF:
lEe:
HEIoz6
FIHayoooqEl
ut ttt |.:lHGIEUH
HI
c,
P
FIln-o
Htr4H,oz
('r)
EKhi
EI
z<OH{trt€o..o
orin
orlP.o
(t
ttut
v)
tilno
tr
TDo
HiorlHoz
11oci
utHo
7f tP.
orl
vPcfo
|.l
0,rr
ts.oa
@
(t
F.
P.
ts-
!,a
P.cfP.o
r)o
oo!(tiq,
P
No
P.o{
oEt{Xq
trl
o
o
3ZOPP.BFtrI
P.50tQrd
tr
o
iJo
H
zPB
oFrl
Igl
Ho2I,€c!Fbl
q!
=It
P.H
q
P
r-l
ooo
rd
o
o
oo
0.o
F.
H.
=,
},
15rb
Flo
p,
H
P.
Fb
p,
15
H
P.op,ttHo
Itr uItx
l|". td
IFJlg trt
lP. t'llI tt
t" ..
td luto tF
l5 lcdt=l
lP. ftll.f lo'lo
t'
l0'
lFl
lo
IEF.
le.
tq,
lrflrt
FTl'lrt
lH
loI'lP.to
lo
tg
l8
lo
lFb
lo'
Itzo
tttttFHo
''Fl
Hoz
{HF
E,I
E'
tsl
nFoot{oo
trlFU
{Hrt
ocE
o{zH
2o
oHoz!.Ec!n!t
PrHOts)
UI
Fl t'lP.o6rdrioP.ryorf5|<
P.EulPogpro(nooo
Flro F.Ft ttoo<o.P.gtt
OK
oq,
p,o
oof+ooo9' p,
t-l fprp
croEoai
ogoonPtoltqPDF
N9'OrrZciH9',zoo/
ct
t\fi'
,{pt.H
o
9'cfF.
F
E
},
P
H
HI
Fl
ooIF-
FJ
oo,
0trdEP
P-oq,
cf
5
art
0,3l?(
op,
oFFl
o
UI
{P.
ta
Port
9'
o!,
=z9,>ts-3PH
ts-JOQ rtj
>vgEordnFrOHo()o}'..2
E
EEotr|1rrOHoo
Ul ltl,zt?I'
IHIH
I trl
IHt=lqIEIHt<Itrt
Itl
IFllq
|-tltltltltltl
<r> 4> <I' ID <t, <1, lEul P ItlJoutuP lltjOoooo I
ooooo loEOOoo llEPtsFPOvlurtttltslcq|ts{
1Jt 4t, <f> 4t> 4t, <r>PH € 1..HoouP oooouluP z99S-.S9oooooooooooooooooo
.!>.t 1t> lJ> ..J><D!,NtsoooulNFr trloooouro tlt
trtoooooooooooo
I
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
FIL E COPY
PRESENT
Greg Amsden
Jeff Bowen
Kathy Langenwalter
Allison Lassoe
Dalton Williams
Diana Donovan
July 26, 1993
ABSENT STAFF
Bill Andemon Kristan Pritz
Mike Mollica
Shelly Mello
Jim Curnutte
Tim Devlin
Tom Moorhead
1. Update on the request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for the
development of single family homes located on Tracts A and B, The Valley, Phase ll/1 480
Buffer Creek Rd.
Applicant: SteveGensler/ParkwoodRealty
Planner: Kristan Pritz and Gary Murrain
Kristan Pritz explained that Greg Hall, the Town Engineer, did not feel comfortable signing
off on the building wall drawings and that this was normally something Gary Murrain
handles.
Gary Murrain stated that he was comfortable with the design of the wall and the structure
that the structural engineer for the project had come up with. He said that the wall
seemed over designed but that the calculations do make sense.
The PEC agreed that Gary's sign off on the drawings was acceptable-
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the PEC wanted Greg Hall to inform them about what the
site disturbance would be.
Kristan Pritz explained that the site disturbance would be great.
Jay Peterson stated that the Ordinance is not worded correctly in respect to the PEC
cohdition to add the plat information on the walls, access road and building wall. He
understood that this was a disclosure type process and that it was his understanding that
they could modify the plans without going through the variance process.
Kristan PriE agreed that the notations were to alert future buyers that plans were on file
at Community Development so design requirements could be evaluated'
Both Jay and Kristan agreed to change the wording of the ordinance.
Planning and Environmenlal commission
July 26, 1993
TOWN OF VAIL
VoiI Colorudo 81657
3034792100
FA,Y 3034792157
Mr. Jack Snow
Box 3378
Vail, CO 81657
RE: GRFA catcutailons for The Valtey, phase tl
Dear Jack:
The-Gommunity Developmentstaff has recalculated the Gross Resirjential FloorArea (GRFA) for
it 9 t'.u" {*g!linS units under construction at The Valley, Phase il. This consfuaion proleit islisted as Bufbhr Creek Townhousas in the Town files. The calculations shown below are 6aseO
on he 1990 ordinances. As I am sure you ate auate,the Town recenUy revised the ordinances
regulating GRFA. These changes became etfective January 1, 1991. -
Single Family Residence:
First Floor of Townhouses:
Second Floor:
Third Floor:
Loft Level:
Total
1768
1780
1823
970
315
6656
lf you have any questions about this information, or would like to see tre drarings used in
cafculating the GRFA, please callme at4Z9-2199.
'.i
t
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR 'THE VALLEY, PHASE IIN
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall:
Provide documentation that the parking lot design
approved by the Design Review Board on May 1 isacceptable to the Town of VaiL Fire and Public Works
Departments and both owners of the propertyt
OR
Provide document,ation that eleven parking spaces in theparking garage are available and that the proposed
development has the right to use thern;
Provide documentation, with signatures from both olrners,
showing the totaL amount of available GRFA, the amount, of
GRFA already used, the amount to be used in the proposedplans approved by the DRB on May 1, and the remaining
amount to be used in future development,. Allcalculations are to be made using the 1991 codes.
Provide documentation that the applicant has the right to
use Grousse Glen property for drainage purposes,'
Provide hazard studies for the rockfal-l and debris flow
hazards;
Show that the development complies with all zoning
standards, specifically height and site coverage.
1.
2.
bu-
bv
3.
4.
Lt,t-Lar
)a ,O
rninimize conflicts between phases'
4. The parties recognize that a parking.arranetement-deemed
satisiactory UV the Town of VaiI in- connection with Phase I
;;;;16;;nr'is i p="."qoisite to final Town approval of such phase.
(51 rf necessarY
Phasevr, Crossview will
to utilize an existing
Vail Condominitrms.
in order to facilitate the developrnent of
issign to Buffehr Creek its rights, if any,
parfing structure senring Grouse GIen at
A It is anticipated that Buffehr Creek will acquire
aaefite parXing by estabfiqhing its rights corc.erning the Grouse
GIen parking structtre and, if n6cessary; bI uti-l-izing the existing
pirfing spaies on Tract B-'2. Buffehr C-r'eeti shall exert reasonable
I"a--a-iiig;,nt efforts to avoid the necessity of involving Tract B-
2 in the phase r pirring plan. rn the event there is a delay in the
establishment oe' phasL'l parking rights in the Grouse GIen
=tr""i""i- "r if for any bther reason an acceptable parking
iii""""r"i.tt is ttot pt"."n€ irnrneaiately prior to the time Phase I
il-!g ;;-'-""""ia"r"-a for final approvat, crossview shall allow
Buffehr Creek t--turcfrase from--crossview a portion of land
"o"ti-i".a-witfrin trict B-2 for the purpose of providing a parking
pfli"-riii"t is icceptable to the _Town-.
-The location and dirnensions
of such land shall be determined by agreement of the parties prior
io suctr purchase. The purchase pr-ice for such land shall be based
upon the- fair market value at the tine of sale'
7. The allocated parcel of the Buffehr Creel<' Tract B-
L, is presently allocated TrbOo square .feet- of G'R'F'A' In the
"i""t tiiat, in -order to gain ipprovit by th.e Town of Vail for Phase
I of the developrnent,- Sutfdnr Creelk is required to obtain
additional G.R.1n-i., Crossview shall seII to Buffehr Creek the
additional anount riquired, up to a naximum of 11500 G'.R'F'A-' lt;;;i;;;i iiz.oo per-squar.g f-oot. All c.R.F.A. calculations shall
Ue'nased on the tdwn of Vail standards applicable in 1990.
S. Neither Party shall take any action or cause any
ornissions that would re3ult-in the loss of lny development rights
on tt" parcel as established by the P'U'D' -approval previously
crranted uy nasle County. Neith6r parEy strall take any -action- or
;;;;;;;'or-ir-= ions thal wourd detrinentll Iy af fect existing rights
to off-s1te parking or G.R.F.A. allowances'
VII. COST OF DEVEIOPMENT
1. Each party shall be solely responsible for the costs of
development upon its own Allocated Paicel , including costs of
financ-ing, planning, construction, and sale'
75 $ulh hontage rcad
Ydl. colorldo E1657
(303) f792138
(303) 47+,2139
October 29, L99O
offlce ol community dwelopment
Ur. J.R. HodgesP. O. Box L297Dillon, co 80435
RE: Lions Ridge Subdivision Tracts A and a, Flling #2also known as Phase II , The Valley
Dear Randy:
The planning staff discussed your letter of october 12, 1990 and
has concluded that of the three GRFA and density scenarios'youprovide, ttre Town nust adhere to the nost restrictive one. Because
several of the development proposals in The Valley t'tere approvedin the Colrnty and then annexed to the Town, the current Town zoning
does not always match the rrgrandfatheredrr developnent rights. I
have included a letter frorn Kristan Pritz, dated February 11, 1985,providing the details of the past approvals. Briefly, Iet me tell
you that a naxiuum of 26 units with 321909 square feet of GRFA is
what the town will allow.
I did not nention in my phone call to you this norning that you
have options, such as a rezoning, that would increase the GRFA
potential. on the site. I want to be sure you knolt.that this review
process is available to you if you are interestedi however, the
Town has strong reserrrations about increasing the GRFA potential .
Your tine nay be best spent vorking with the approVal that existsfor the property at thls tine. Please see Kristanrs letter
concernJ.ng site planning issues.
If you have any other guestions, please contact ne or Kristan at
the planning departnent at 479-2L38.
Sl.ncerely,ffi![own Planner
e9tAe/
{
tI
oflice ol communlty development75 roulh frontage road
vall, colorado E1657
(303) 4792138
(303) 479'2139
October 29. L99O
Ur. it.R. HodgesP. O. Box L297
Dillon, Co 80435
Dear
%r,
The planning staff discussed your letter of October 12, 1990 and
has boncluded that of the three GRFA and density scenarios you
provide, the Town must adhere to the nost restrictive one. Becauseieveral of the developnent proposals in The valley were approved
in the County and then annexed to the Town, the current Town zoning
does not always natch the rrgrandfathered'r developnent rights. I
have included a letter from Kristan Pritz, dated February 11, 1985'
providing the details of the past approvals. Briefly, let ne telI
lou that-a maxinun of 26 uni€s wlth 32,909 sguare feet of GRFA is
what the Town will allow.
I did not mention in my phone call to you this norning that you
have options, such as a rezoning, that would increase the GRFApotential on the site. I want to be sure you know that this review
process is available to you if you are interestedi howeverr.the
iown has strong reserrratlbns about increasing the GRFA potential .
Your tlne may be best spent workLng with the approval that exists
for the property at thls tine. Please see Kristanrs letter
concerning site planning issues.
If you have any other questlons, please contact me or Kristan at
the planninE departnent at 479-2L38.
Sincerely,
/ / ./ /&^! H,*,rt*\
Andy Knuiltsen \
Town Planner
October 12, 1990
! t d L1''-",
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner Torln of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vai1, Co. 81657
Dear Kr is tan:
Re: Lions Ridge Subdivlslon Tracts A and B, Filing /12
Slnce we would like to
approval this winter,
submit Eh j.s proj ec t
vour assistance would
in a titnely manner for
be greatly apprec lated .
cc: Robert M. Ullnann
Sceven M, Gensler
tux 1297
drllon, colorado
80435
f J.W
fr* &l-
,l(JWr-cv'''
E P N"{k
(vz,s,,f , /,zb) -,
4o!5(11 ry
As we have discussed in the past, rte are starting to work on
schematic plans on the above project. To date, Steve Gensl-er
has not been able to locate an approved master plan for the
overall (existing units and vacant land) pro-lect and as a result
have numerous questions about the allowable GRFA and nunber of units.
The documents we have in our possesslon lndicate between 26 and 28
units allowed with an allowable GRFA of 32,909 to 33,7L4 square feeE.
However, based on the cluster distrlct zonlng we would be allowed
approximaEely 22 units r.rith a maximum of 40,605 square feet. We
would llke to have the lower number of units and the 40,605 square
feet of GRFA or not include the exisling foundatlons in the allow-
able 33,714 square feet GRFA.
rl 303.468-5871
75 south fronlage roed
vall. colorado 81557
(303) 476-7000 otflce of communlly development
August L2, 1988
Mr. Maurice Nelson
P.o. Box 544
Ft. collins, co 80521
Re: Existing Foundations at Grouse Glen, Town of Vail,
Colorado
Dear Maurice:
My understanding is that you are the owner of the Grouse Glen
pioperty. As you know, tirere.are several existing foundations
b" tfr" iroperti. The ioundations have been fenced in order
ii*ii "^ny iireTsafety problems. However, the exposed
foundati-ons take away frorn the overall high guality appearance
"i in" neighborhood. I am requesting that you try.to improve
the appearance of the site_by-covering the- foundations with
fiff -a;d a layer of top soil-which could then be revegetated.
i-tni"i your ireighbors would appreciate your effort to improve
the appearance of the site.
I strongly encourage you to co:sider this request' I am aware
that the Town of Viif'has no right to require you to do this
work. However, it would be a welconed inprovement to the area
and certainfy no- prevent you from buildinq on the foundations
ii a later tirne. it yo,, w-ould like to discuss this issue with
ure further, please feel free to call me at 476-7000 ext. 103.
SincerelY,
r f\rl./. I l.r 'l{fietzh^ (rrh-lul$rrr\ ltllrKristan PrLtz
Seni.or Planner
KP:KC
t3Sac,r.$* $tttb
t {,od h,.
Hr"dg
[6\YII-^^U
luwn u tlfll
75 soulh frontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
February 1l , .l985
Pe'uer Feistmann
P.0. Box 2438
Vai1, Colorado 8.l558
Re: Phase iI, The Valley
f)c: r Daio r
oftice of communlt/ development
I am wrjting to confirm the information that I gave you over the phone
concerning Phase II, Tract A of the Va11ey Planned Unit D-evelopment. nr? ...
According to our records, Phase il, A is approximatelyr*=*F:* .,'lJJQUq
Phase IIA and B was originally approved for 28 units having 33,7.l4 squarefeet of GRFA. This .i nformation is listed in a letter dated March 10, 1980.In a document dated February i9, 1981 , "Proposed Zoning for West Vail
Annexation Area," Phase II, Tracts A and B was approved for 26 units
wi'uh an allorved GRFA of 32,909 square feet. The Vaii Commun'i ty Development
Department considers these figures to be the accepted development statist.i csfor Phase II. Our records do not show a breakdown of units for Tracts
A and B which make up Phase II. Town of Vail records also show that
6 units have been constructed on Phase iI and are presently called "Grouse
G'len." Six foundations also exist on Phase II.
The Valley was developed as a Planned Unit Development that used Residential
Cluster zoning as a guide. The intention of this project was to develop
multi-family dwellings using a clustered site plan approach. In generai,
the subdividing of an individual phase of a planned unjt developmentis not encouraged. In answer toyoufquest'ion of whether or not it would
be possible to subdivide Phase II, Tract A into two primary,/secondary
lots, the p1 anning staff would like to see a more detailed site plan
in order to determjne if this would be appropriate. The staff would
be concerned that the project constructed on Phase II, Tract A vrould
be compatible with the remaining portion of Phase II, Tract B located
across the road. The idea of a p1 anned unit development is that the
project should vrork as a vrhole and also reflect a continujty in the
architecture and site planning found arnong a1 1 the phases of the project.
The staff does not encourage the subdividing of indivjdual phases.
tqli
oo oco
-Peter Feistmann
February 'll , '1985
Page Two
However. qiven the fact that Phase II, Tract A is across the road from
phase Ii, Tract B, there may be a possibi'lity that it could be developed
separateiy. In the report dated April 18, 1979 addressed to Jeff Burleson
concerning the dra'inage on Phase II of The Valley, it 'is.evident that
some type of drainage System would have to be constructed on Tract A.
At thi;'t.ime it is 'impossible to determine what kind of drainage work
would be needed for Tract A without a detai'l ed site p1 an. The most
important point'is that drainage work would probab'ly have to be completed,
ani it rvould need to functjon in a compatible way with Tract B across
the street. P'l anning and Environmental Comrnission approvals. would also
be necessary if it were determined that it wou'l d be a feasible idea
to deve'lop Tract A seParatelY.
I hope thisfiles do not
at this time.
S j ncere]y,
,l:
..i \' '' 'i-)\'.--'
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP: br
information will be helpful to you- Unfortunately, our
provide detailed p1 ans that could answer all your questions' If you have further quest'ions, please give me a call.
tl
. /"'1i..
j-
i
\.-
[own uf
\
\l
{,-y'.rr" i
tailr)
Mr. J.R. HodgesP. O. Box L297Dil1on, CO 80435
RE: Lions Ridge Subdivision Tracts A and B, Filing #2also known as Phase II, The Valley
Dear Randy:
The planning staff discussed your letter of October J_2, L99O andhas concluded that of the three GRFA and density scenarios youprovide, t.he Town must adhere to the most restrictive one. Becauseseverai of the developnent proposals in The Val1ey were approvedin the county and then annexed to the Town, the curfent rown zoningdoes noc always match the t'grandfathered" developrnent rights. Ihave included a letter frorn Kristan pritz, dated February L1 , 1995,providing the details of the past approvals. Briefly, 1et me tellyou that a naximurn of 26 units with 32,909 square feet of GRFA iswhat the Town will alIow.
75 south lrontage road
,aii. cotar irdo 8165f
(303) 479-2138
(303) 479-2139
October 29, 1990
I did not nention in my phone callha.re opti-ons , such as a rezoning,potential on the site. I want to beprocess is available to you if you
Town has strong reservations aboutYour time nay be best spent workingfor the property at this tine.concerning site planning issues.
ollice of community development
to you this norning that youthat wouLd increase the GRFAsure you know that this revieware interested; however, theincreasing the GRFA potential .with the approval that existsPlease see Kristanrs letter
If you have any other questions, please contact me or Kristan atthe planning department at 429-2139.
Sincerely,
/,',/'/-fu"L, kL,'^.1#-..\--r/ ---i - \Andy Knudtsen \Town Planner
i
i ,]
' lgaa6-,
'l /v< +
f" ,rV l.rv.a W..^ al
@ l.lr,.' r,w r, t"
,J.3f a+-'r-c4"
?,1qJ r,L.u4 /6qsi / lt lW
ot.02'eaLn,
$.
f$a '{
5rt
PiiA6eSr
./ . . .fl j/ ,l l: tl l.tl It'f I,"' ,'iU t
I JJt / ,\f. I
-*t t D.t 12 t
a t :.- .t,{. t
frIJf
.I t f
l,> | /
'lrd
".
ff45= L(toot( OS re.r'a)
s.b
t2.
afi.44
N o4'tr 4'E -..---"---1 4 4e
/
-'-g
'-<" 'eA-: -Vf-stt
'/ G{<<^
h/
i i i-',.. "Li !,i-i:-t.-; ,: r t.r. : \.&.isrl_
F!Lttr!.:i 1.j3. r:
S,-r*rt ti U. i,,r',,'.,t
PHATE EI, TRAgr D
ll e-l r
t;lF-f- .t
oo oo
Project Application
l:s/NCProject Name:
Proiect DescriPtion:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing , Zone
-
commenrs: FlLy. ' l/nLLt: V n, , 4{ t:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Date
Seconded by:
DISAPPBOVAL
Summary;
ig'Approval
I
o^r". ,!a- ,? .-9?,
q&lg.El
,\
[\
-.{r.1
tr^eil,.'$4
o
$ll "1'rl
r, tI -'!e
yr'!,1ewtLr
<<E
hl livf-
%Mu*---
tw ?alQ
Ww
;+":tb
i-i .,i.r'i-..., i\i,.;j. ri.-.:-r '...'t r;.-$ : 1.._.: ., i, r\_,!_
I N6.t4',X.bl
1*tt'
r Ne E',%Vl
.{)\f 2b'@'
u/f\' I xzcco'a'e1'' /,-.5L41'
T
e/,l.o,,oz.::6/ Al.?z} ..-
\"
6d.la'e't
se
p;-1,39 li lll.
ffiii'r:r[y-
N ?TZYb'E
422t',
aEzo.?see6b'.'il€ RIoGE
\rtf L
1de(p
fi{Af.g
TFACT C .naz,tb?.>@t
fc,1'31)
59, rRAgT D
i
a-r I
w,{
/E\#6 ,#*
q''t3 q
{t
!lt
z5d.,8)*': 'll4.l/'
0{l
oI
I
4fi
Uallry74a^z
CONSTRUCTION
community development
DATE 1.7-92 PROJECT NO.-PERMIT
trnn
Dtr!
TYPE OF PERMIT
EUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
PERMIT NO.
I.TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION III III IV
2, OCCUPANCY GROUP ABEH
orvtsroN
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
BUILDING
PERMIT FEESTYPE GROUP SO. FT. VAI UATION
8ND-?
- f*,
NEW ALTERATION () AOOITIONAL (
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
COMMERCIAL SYST
-
RESTAURANT SEATING
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
EATHTUB,/SHOWER
NO FIREPLACES
-NO.
TOILETS
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCOVERED PARKING
TOIAL PERMIT EEES
NING ADMINISTRAIOR
NOTES:In no
INSULATION
I HEREAY ACKNOIf,LED(;E THAT I H,\\'E
READTHIS APPI,ICATION AND STATT] TII^T TIII'
AB(}VE IS CORRECT AND ACREE TI) CO}IPI.Y
WITH ALI, T('WN oRDINANCES ANI) STAI'T:
I,AWS REGARDING Bt'I I.DI NG C():!STRI'CTIOI.
VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST, TAP FEE .
SPECIAL NOTES:
LEGAL
DESC.
LOT BLK
FILING
foBNAME: Grouse Glenn Woodstove Add.
-owNER NAME
MAIt ADDRESS
CITY PH.
ARCHITECT FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
ELECTRICAL
cNrRAcroR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIt ADDRESS
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
C ITY PH.
Ua
CONSTRUCTION PER|ITIT DArE /2'zz'g/ PRoJEcr No.-
pERMtT 119. [, '' Q i: r;
department of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
n gurt-orr.rc nI elEcrRrcnL n PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
al r\,tEcHANtcAL ezgroue
I, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP
DlvlsloN
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
BU II. DING
ELECTR ICAL
PERMIT FEESTYPE GROUP SO. FT. VALUATIONL EGAL
DESC.lfut RUFF/:/ e4r& Oltl BUILOING PERMIT
BNAME: 6rense €zE^/
OWNER
ARCH ITECT
NEW() ALTERATION() ADOITICNAL REPAIR
RECREATION FEE
OWELLTNG UNITS
-
ACCOMMOOATION UN
GRF.A. I BEOROOMS
COMMERCIAL SYSI --_+ RESTA
It
H€|GHT rN FT. --\BATHTt
NO FIREPLACES
-IiIO.
TO
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCIVERED PARKING
DESIGN REVIEW EOARO
CLEAN.UP OEPOSIT
G ENERAL
CONTRACTOR TOTAL PERMIT FEES
ILDING OFFICIAL
ONING ADMINISTRATOR
ING NOT€S:
I ltgkEEY ,1cK:l(t\rl-EIx;f, TIIAT I lllll:
RI:AT.' TIIIS APPI.ICA'fI')N AI\DST TI I II l TII':
a8(tVE IS C(thllECT A.\_It ACREf. 11, ( (r\lf Ll
WlTll ALL T.)\i r_ (tRtrlIA}CES .1S1, \I \1t:
l.Aws Rf:cARDING gl ll,o:ric cossle|cTl(r\
fltAlL AOORESS
ELECTRICAL
NTRACTOR
FLOOR
EXT. WALLS
ROOF
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
lurL AoDRESS
rt4 EClr AN
CONTRACTOR
OTHER
CONTRACTO
rnu grci/E 9ruP
r Af L ADDRESS AD.6ax {
cfiy E/jo)A/?De eu ?8-JfV Z
VAIL WATER & SAN DIST TAP FEE .
tha pr|nlary vail
7 9cE rute'<A<eErc
&@cE &toorcFPs l/*tt- q"G-az9c-
I\\I\f't-\EL-ELEIc7t Ir=l IT:lt Ic]l IFl | |al
'5ffi
36'FeLecN(
13n
\_J
$ 3ft" t rc o,'s.€k" sh*ta'&
S-,t^lrb{____t'
'-17zb'attQ /:,SL-
'/ \ ^' lJ !.:1.|--1 EE/A aE_aAF/oi ct"a{/7ifrffaxa
5tB'tt- (u, t' 6aee"l,O'a=*) t'^'J r c t 5 t T o rt )4tW4
€xrz^lsrorJ' €oct-o'J rnl(' pg€ CcaqaAJc€S:
Ba.t- o?9tod€ TO TTcL '" f.retonact *f EcD A'-ncneS)
Ste€g eF Stet€ -r3 a7LE""
fro,\Y c}f-Srzd.{ fr Q4e/{-73
,<"
tr"
I E-t'
A 16" caOCt fz*rz_ wttcc Grse< fieeaa-ta
OpOltrJe (Sne.n rvtffic tzze*t fus-r-e'{€^) f' rrzl
sftooz Pwa Qas<t,JG -7A,a{<4 Fta,rz - r-t+^)
6rWrztAc. ft Pos tflJ+ Cr,^l'Je<tf t Ta €xsrftlC
f,, €te.€e(A4.L cr<trqN€Y- \ \
\\
I*9rert-L€&- -7rtt S-'raiJ€ 57-$P aae37 t4
I
CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL
INSPECTION CARD
(MUST BE POSTED ON JOB S|TE)
eet^')S NAME
PERMTT "t. [7 0
Lrc. No.
Owner:
General Contractor:
Excavator:
Foundation:
Plumber:
Electrician:
Mechanical:
Framer:
Insu lator:
Dry Wall:
Painter:
Roofer:
CONTRACTOR NAMES AND LICENSE NUMBER MUST BE LISTED
INSPECTIONS
Excavation
Footings / Steel
Foundation / Steel
Ground Plumbing
Engineering (Uti lities)
Temp. Electric
Rough Plumbing - D.W.V.
Rough Plumbing - Water
Rough Electric
Gas Piping
THE ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED AND
Rough Framing
lnsu lation
Sheet Rock Nail
Exterior Stucco Wire Nailing
Final Plumbing
Final Electric
Final DRB
Fire lnspection
Final Engineering (Utilities)
{Final Building
APPROVED BEFORE PROCEEDING
UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF ALL ABOVE INSPECTIONS, RETURN THIS CARD
TO BUILDING DEPT. FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPPANCY
S25.OO REPLACEMENT CHARGE FOR LOST INSPECTION CARD
FOR TNSPECTTONS CALL 476-7000, EXT. 235 0R 247
24 Hours In Advance
Between 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday Through Friday
DISAPPROVED APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
,,,,...:]',.^-'.
'fi;,':r ^"""
INSPECTION RE
vAt
READY FOR INSPECTION:to* @*.o rHUR FRI PM
TOWN OF
LOCATION:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
I-l
INSPECTOR-
\
DATE /46- tz
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT palE 1-7-82 PROJECT NO.-
of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
I I /l/? /1Uallrf /flaht
tt ratO
Ttrl
DTT
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
PERMIT No.
r TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV
2 OCCUPANCYGROUP ABEH
DrvrsroN
GFNERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORF'
EUILOING
P€RMIT FEESTYPE GROUP SQ, FT. VALUATION
s
,f=q
8NL-?
-||
EUILDING PERMIT
ELECTRICAL
NEW O ALTERATION AODITIONAL () REPAIR O
DWELLING UNITS
G.R.F,A.-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
COMMERCTAL SYST
-RESTAURANT
SEATING
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
BATHTUA/SHOWER
NO FIREPLACES
-NO,
TOILETS
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCOVERED PARKINC
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TOTAL PERMIT FffS
NING NOTES:In no
INSULATION
I HIJREtsY ACKNOWI,T:DGH TIIAT I HA vT:
REA D TH IS APPLICATI Or* AND ST^TE TllA r Tlll
ABoVE IS CoRI{ECT ANI' AGREE To COIIPI,Y
IfuITH ALL ToWN (}ITI)INANCES Ai{D S1-AI'T:
I,A WS RF]GARDING AUILDINC CoNSTRI'C1'I0]\J,
VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST. TAP FEE :
SPEGIAL NOTES:
LEGAL
DESC.
LOT BLK
FILING
IoBNAME: Grouse Glenn Woodstove Md.
-owNER NAM E
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH,
ARCHITECT F IRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
ELECTRICAL
FIRM
MAIL AODRESS
tNrKAUruf(
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
MAIL ADDRESS
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH
i) :
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 1-7-81
DATE
-
JECT NO.-tttl0t,
PERMIT NO.
department of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
TI
D
!In
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
4i
LEGAL
DESC.FILING
BNAME: Grouse Glenn Hoodstove lrld.
ARCHITECT
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
LECTRICAL
NTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS
MAIL ADORESSPLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
MAIL ADDRESS
MECHANI
CONTRACTOR
MAIL ADORESS
clrY PH.
tvi- TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP
' DtvtstoN
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
BUILDING
PLUMBING
PERMIT FEESTYP€ GROUP SO.FT. VAI UATION
,TF
\)!\.
\
\J
I
EUILDING PERMIT
NEW() ALTERATION O ADDITIONAL/I ) REPAIRO
DWELLING UNITS
G,R.F,A.-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
COMMERCIAL SYST
-
RESTAURANT SEATING
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
BATHTU B/SHOWE R
NO FIREPLACES
-NO.
TOILETS
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCOVERED PARKING
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TO74L PERMITf
AOMINISTRATOR DATE
rNctrcrm@
INSULATION
THICKNESS R.VAt UE
I HLREBI' ACK:iI}IAI-I:I)(;E THAT I HA\'E
R EAD TII IS APPI,ICATI('N A N D ST TE TII A'T TtI !
ABOVE IS CORRECl ANI' AGRI]E 1'o (:O]\IPI,Y
WITH AI,I, TOWII ()RDINANCES AND STAl'I:VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST. TAP FEE :
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT s71E /2 -22-3/PROJECT NO.--
pERMtr No. [' ' t{ ij ri
department of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
Dn
i-l
DT
EUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
oqoS
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP
l lll l
olvlsloN
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
BUILDING
PERMIT FEEdTYPE GROUP SO.FT. VALUATIONL tLr AL
nFar^FtLtNG /9t rtu Ea e& _gat{BUILDING PERMIT
BNAME: G;p6€ 6zE^/PLAN CHECK
E LECTRICAT
NEW( } ALTERATION ADOTTTCNAL REPAIR
RECREATION FEEEIPL
MAIL AODRESS
crTY PH.
ARCHITECT
-
ACCOMMOOATION UNITSOWELLING UNITS
G.R.F.A.
COMMERCIAL SYST
HEIGHT IN FI.
NO FTREPLACES
REO PARKING
OESIGN REVIEW BOARO
FIRM
MAIL AODRFSS
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR TOTAL PERMIT FEES
NING NOTES:
ELECTRICAL
R.VALUE
FTOOR
EXT. WALLS
ROOF
MAIL ADDRESSPLUMEING
CONTRACTOR
MECHANICA
CONTRACTOR I
'II]REBY
ACK\('\TLED(;E TIIAT I IIA\'E
Rt:A1r TIt|S APPLICA fIt).\ At\l.) sTATL Tll^'l Tttr
A8()VE lS C()RRECT AND GItge llt c()\tPLY
WtTlf ALL T()wN ()Rlrli\A:r.'CES .1:i1, stAT t:
l,AwS Rt:GARDIN0 lt'lLO;NC C(1f,-STR ( CTl('\
ctry Eor/Anng pA ?25-32 Z
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
VAIT WATER E SAN DIST. TAP FEE :
SPECIAL NOTES:
ln.9iinLry var!
$o0
s
b
*
x
-
Ff.}
Fr
B
I
^l d
l]FnDDrflilffiqj
llflrffit
llffil I lEl
fF[I LL-J Ifl
I Fnl---L-----lri
iFH'n#f^'$$ll-l I in. 'rlN. 1 IIH R I*R
Iil
R
{
\)
6\
Iq
N
\
t\
?x
Ri
,S^
lilF
D
D
lD
D
{s
;B
l3 po\u<
pil
$\
$ HrT [F
i vr N; tR
K t. R) 0Hp [ [*'n i Fu iAJ d 3t, knR*{R a9$ L\ g'.: Ai': "( n r\a : r Ri:
\i
h$
].
+R p $;
t I I *H
Ii;T\
n t \ \ fr\i&K$F
iFINn
%\R ilN
*lii'
k
3
c\
t.-.
N'
I
{Y
(\
Ic
m
$o
\
*0
b
Or
Iq,
{
f'
O TOWN OF VAIL O f 17 11 ,
tNSpECTtONCARD PERMtrNo. I /v _-
(MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SrrE)
CONTRACTORS NAME Lrc. No.
Owner:
General Contractor:
Excavator:
Foundati
Plumber:
Electrician:
Mechanical:
Framer:
Insu lator:
Dry Wall:.
Painter:
Roofer:
CONTRACTOR NAMES AND LICENSE NUMBER MUST BE LISTED
INSPECTIONS
Excavation
Footings / Steel
Foundation / Steel
Ground Plumbing
Engineering (Uti lities)
Temp. Electric
Rough Plumbing - D.W.V.
Rough Plumbing - Water
Rough Electric
Gas Piping
Rough Framing
ln su lation
Sheet Rock Nail
Exterior Stucco Wire Nailing
Final Plumbing
Final Electric
Final DRB
Fire Inspection
Final Engineering (Utilities)
{Final Building
THE ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED AND APPROVED BEFORE PROCEEDING
UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF ALL ABOVE INSPECTIONS, RETURN THIS CARD
TO BUILDING DEPT. FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPPANCY
$25.00 REPLACEMENT CHARGE FOR LOST INSPECTION CARD
FOR TNSPECTTONS CALL 476-7000, EXT. 235 0R 247
24 Hours In Advance
Between 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday Through Friday
DISAPPROVED APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
*
-INSPECTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST.'
VAIL
DATE /-26 - e z-JoB NAME lregga G
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:r,,tor.r 6F) weo rHUR FRI ?,ao rrteu
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL o
tr
o
tr
D
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERD FRAMING
tr INSULATION GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL POOL / H, TUB
{ frsrproe no bcep
/rrrunl T] FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
D CONDUIT
n
SUPPLY AIR
tr.'/
n riuar-N FINAL
PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
ffi,,,",
DATE /46- tu-INSPECTOR.'.
-l
MORGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
General Contractors
Proposed Development
June 3, 1980
GRFA Increased Units
VALLEY PHASE II A & B
7 A Units @
12 B Units @
5 C Units @
2 D Units @
9,289 sq. ft.
13, 524
6,960
3,135
I
32,909
1327 sq.
1127 sq.
1392 sq.
1568 sq.
ft. u
ft.
ft.
ft.
Al I square footage rePresented
Haximum allowable GRFA square
is 33,714 sq. ft.
Decrease in square footage of
Decrease of 2 units
Oecrease of 5 Parking sPaces.
is calculated bY
footage aPProved
805 sq. ft.
GRFA requirenents.
by the CountY
[,.,:.1 Ci:'rr.,: f]Cr:< ?)10 ', \.,:,r, C,ri . ':8ii ,' t (:'il-;'l) ','it-1"\'
1' a..;2 I.I) :t.jc .l'. " "") -L L ' t :.' ;ot"i6tt"-pniffips, gagle.County Fee $2! 'CP..1tJ.'CrUJ Joo,: -1O.1
Recorder:
: \'-\ t
)':
=H5 c,:
)-i
a
F HiFiE;f; '$ TEF[:Af,liT FEEg
E. liEEtri" 3o o oe og: iE3ifi_Efit ttrifE fr
iE *lg;lEilE r**s l* s;s' snd s'c isn'ni
ilE lrgsF;rr;ii f[;n E ;
[; l;itrtnE
gli4
l1 [[F [ii [E Fiii€i nH rii:Hslfllll iiFH E E
"
Fi iiirlyJ* ilfli F r: :'q Ei IEHEI ; ;;:{-;Fi[B; [:-3F i , E
ii l*iintl li* [r ;; Ei[
rr lEuirt l itrlhiirti
'llffi
i
=
E-i ;rt,rrrs e*F; *r i,E ft ti lil5: a
qgg;aieirii Eiii E ;
ri ergeee?r
'*sr
g[ ff Hi E$
rHil[i I'lifi?liiBl icffi'i ii}iElifl Fii ;i i[
-t*: :$ri! fl rffi;erff1 ffifl: r:l+6*li; F'' l; :H g'' F' < o' {l *
"
5'1g9-
FC.
C-{ a-
i'..
<io>
rt3H, I
il.)
N{
H\o
L'I -J,)o(no
Po€;N()=.o.tro50
.:
lr
oooH stt |u |.u Fl id pldn 5r+rFr 3l I j i / 5=r-t o . o.0, p! !, o Ar o.Fc ts'o o o a a v,ooar Ho o o F o don O Fl \J l-l l-1. l'tgo?f=r tr<tl o. P.0r o H H 0Q H O HO 5(, ctH O H rt-. rc 0q oru ttn H.< H fi n,f 5 F-{ r-{ FtH.O H D < OJ r-- r, 0) ctOcd ct P.Ed H(/, P. FI CJfi5!tFloa oCrrOrt'rt 5C)goHO,oo:'o0r{5HP. gl t-lrtct I3rH(r o s P F-r r\'CO I N 95 u, O @oo'Orttro Fr. g)50(D30.'dDfi(,ltt 50FOHP.B O5oF,0q o<Jo Hl.poo
Fh t-l
o oo <oc0r o HF-r !'ofi oocS l-HFh5 rt $o55'r-t< o{P.otrH.oH
= 'o5 F'.p-P' Pr. 0tP.Oi3oftt-{(',po (/: o.rr tso H35(/,o.?iu,.C I' l-t O sr FJ prt fi 3 Fr fi o p.-O< S g) 3 Fl H !t P. H l't 3 Fd
7 0. 5 ts.zf F qCrA ) Cg'oa0l!r'ori o.55oo gtcqcoJ- 50t! !) Fl P.O cf A, Ar O o ct o. o"o0lhrd_. ud4 n9 rt'cro o n oFlool> o 5 5EJOO.E| F'.O(/)O.Ftor{Qoql! ot/J - o F <o o5o<o r-cllu F $ oHJ t.Pts.rtH5OHF Frlig A) ro(/l E r-l H 5 rr sr 5 :j.0r }..Ft H.oolo rt5 p.<0)o P. OtDct(/lO-!r h' l< 0)0rHq|r0r)t-l ocrHtlo- atP !r.lP fitn7(/.q.fi ogdop- rt Flu, cr.!ilr{ H.o o o .i go.o (,, r,. Fl:tDI_ q (r,tr,o H.J0r{oprooPlo pr$<HO- d5 oH.JoI _.ts|''l (/).r!JHH d coqortS'rr3's I PPHo r-l (D P'- fi p. !l€EllrlQ !|rf-HP. ts Ft<P.6t'HO olo O OO <0a O. o.dc |J.5 ilr,-rc lz Fh51< |'u :to p.cb rroa!(',AAalq oo p'fhrtft 5rtnp.- o!tA.Fr glH Fr- e)A:Ooo 0q Co obr
_ -f'! Jlio Fl oo r-t F,l oSB('|FloH€K(,,lq o$Jo og Oo. gr o r-.H. rtle) o.(, o. rt Fnts. H ci o ort. tr FrlFl o<=. I o .og!c/3. P6lu rr O-3. odo F-r-|0r \tC C orr OIO Oots. tn Q. !t F..o ltaD i)a Y. rtlz u,P$qO fi3o0rrtl'.do F-ol. H.or.54..o O r,.O io i'- oo p-JrJ 5FrEq.5 0 trfioo9)portq'lF{ .P:3 O0:F OP' t-o O.f'tr', lP tll o'vl r: r-l u, o rt p- g) < rJof)Oli.z Xo 7.D H O rt Fa- dq)P P'Ftl(n :f tr-o, O tr.Y rtOH F.Oq" P' P Oo r-l O r. Fo rJu)ri O cri.Eq FnUt ct Or gtYO. !1. rr H.p € o< o {FJFO-P7t|u.? ct tql 5 '.UFt Ft rt F.+Ei-<HoQ.o d g, o p'H.tr, OO ngi iri-,.
9F_q ,o$p(noo rt5 rtHCq O5(,96 !'_!q-oo.H l-,H.o r-: x- r-lH. OCJryOr. .qt OuttrU.o!-t._H HQPFr{hfH p ii - lroH'!-po. oi lF{oe boFds'F.€o0rl1. ntr<Qr. Fr9\ Ho'Fnrorr H.tr OeArO an A dH<irp.i!'Q50c 3t-i >lt'. -Vfiqd'f-b'Efre 5'E'8ilE"q$EfrRf$sX!qH'Fl l".Y3ocrf >r- - o<F,. hns E ry.nq0, \ 0rnio'oZfo 3 5^ <o ? .r'-'-r,.r-,.
O lj'>o O A'- oJ, zE', I \5i 'jft
t13<t*-l\.H. _i 1^ z?- H. \ __-----+--.-
^.6i B/__j '" *=.1
r t'f f rt'd € titar N' o H.ar !i l.t l-t $ Po'D o < o o P.oa H5. t-l O r-l 'tt ff FJ P.o.o o o P.O Fr 5r CrFiOol- €gq!J HC I Ooa €P.ts. Q. C)Frd' u)gc H rt o P.oc 9rx (to Fo (l)o'fi >C O0rOQ.u.U) I t-r. rt Ft (tF
1,. o F PSpr Hc< 5 rr O O,O O.O nH. P.€ H- o ts.tnOa/JJ 5 rU- OOP.hho0q Ft ca'o P. Fl (', o D (r3r)(D F.3 c.oO P.O O P. O.H. frtta,i.J rnF| I|3 tn a l,, 5. F,. t::rcri!r0roJ0!oDn rt P.5 n !, (n P'oa.o c q.< :'n o P< o oY o 5 (DrOrrCn('B cr3 r-.,. o C FU cr B aio 5 r) r) (') Hgr o oPge rt trr AJ |,.gq dct P. 4)rt:J'0roo"oc oFnr-t 5 0r o Fh Q.or K
ta 5L.rO 6 Ft 0r F/.dF o4 !oc)Osrtsf-Oo€5O(D ts ?rdHoF,3o'o oO ooPOtF!t<OFtp cr 5D O 0r Fh 0rr:o ts 1rH O.ry6F-|cfAr rtOH'o f O rt O 5-P P-rt5 O HrO|J.O O O 0)llrH.Hr-rOHrrc)J5 F iroo.ri cr 9'cr(/| a, o coooorrS 5!jFl Ft o.E,rr 53 €:t9.C O<YH.!r o o o 0tFtrroorrd11Olto !i 5 tD r, 0. Fhtp) tsoo.:r o.(ncrOO. tr.O :t.t d9(D rt0ro(t
HY
't
0)
ct
ts.o
Fh
0)orlonY
rto
rt
o
ilo
rn
Ft
lrt
lo
or
U,
ct
Fl
tr
rt
P.
g,
tr
D!f)o
rt
rto
loj o
lHots. 0t(,t i'l
lrt eoSl-
qH
o.Flrtot5
"f'!rlo
,13
Pl (/)
Xl ctlrtF{Col o
Ol rt
ct I t-'.
{13P.l
o.ls,oE
i'l h!oh
Ar lO
'13
l.t
lo
P.
PJF|
rt
o
Hl
!0tl
io
io
B
oo
9lHo
(t
9' F\r r'a 4:ii
, J, "' I'i
'J!..: ,. ,.'':,.^r
.v
i)
qr l-, 6',€.v l o ,u!]Y =
,o.!t 'ln:'gli.o.t/, 0, !tF r-t (D rtoctGa r:. O tO7 7a oo dFJ p. t-{ H.'OrrO.H FH5rT o- O-o 4'c DFtoocH p.Hf? O FJ Fnn Ft!]. il r: $ o gto H.r: O OO0t rt O: =t-t ..5 t1vt =J. O crrro t' H.>o ic" .ga "O P l'ibC ..Co o -. 01 0I r-tnfro..d.-tr€Nt =n= '7'.@iI o=oo,9, $t'l € ..O rt ri iro(,]3 0
ht-:C l'C (,)O
- r-; .._ -1 0r tird o t'!:,.r! ts. crTO .. O r-,. ot.Ft Fl (r.6.o .. o(niJntUr]J iJOOOj :Fl11Oc'O AtOH ..Oh oFnHO O ..tH FtFhO a-r rt' '!'7 >=ul G ur.O ... O
FJ Fo.P.O . O ;::, 3o. do ...o
id Fl: c -.. . FlH O 0r', tT r., . , t-tH qr o.f :, .,uP q. rr :;O0ra1,rt tdj F.,,4 ,Al!: o
J
3
v€oHtstsFl !J50e zF:cdtJ 3o ts.drtOlO vl Ft
B F3O
OOFiOHF=
ts.rtrt
(0q.
IF
vr]J 4ogH>
$:'.FloO ti,iuo
r-d D FtoH3ooFltortvH ctoo.
rtO0rrt\t ;f3oOC { P N ts t.tFhF'O{{+.o\q,rttr | -ou.fi o H or 6 0 {tr t€ | (, o o o tso.tso o o o o .F.lto U|<ooH
lF|lo
t:
t:
l"rol
"loi
or
o1
oi
1cfl
ol
ol
rl
3l
P.'5xl
no
o
oo
0,clo
Io
fv
O
o
nrcou$9rtr-(/'ooOH3F{rrH
o F-l
gr 0J
rTrto-oo
!JP.tnoo5
HOH FtlH'ct
o
ano
G
'-i
(,:
H.0'o
o
r_h
c?
o
g
<oH!rDr;j.
F,l. CD oHct
P.g
oo
o>
Ftl cT
ri<3.ctoP.HF..o
P)oFl
ocrofiart 'dFt. oca Ftcr?oP.coo5
fiOOHI
A tno\-, v
o|.u o|'ornt o=0r 50rrt(,! d('to P'ooga
NH O..o.. Fgr(Ao-Flrl d7ol o0lOgl ct5ct 'dfi tttP-€ gr oGl O tn l-tCn ortOrt P'c P. <ooo . J
rtOoo Fn
HIrg Ct!'rt tgr:i oUiOo5po<o H
l-{ { ri.rt!'
v,
Fo H.90-o.o
(',ooFhtrt rt)-.o
(t,ts.F0.oo!tU!O
Flfi
oo
E€ ln HeglFl;lelElg
l-['i[il,*l*|H;
rtffii;iHHl
Trf,BHrltFlElHlBltp.t: s Ft't"l5lilql6.
:? H *; E illHlHlf,lF
"; a.n -
".EJ{lo'*''Bo"'FBseBJt*lgll< H ., f; .' .' 9' l[ifrlrl^o :r 1-,.f lr Fh r riqb lg
a: Een lH 3lsll,BE.rE$$B.6lilei3lE
HE s:: l[:l"BEFlHgE.ES?""si']ll"l"I i, p: 6 r:.o 5 pfololqlFjt
5-i"n 3 t< rtlHHrcl
iri o ul ;o .f -f glgjF
* 8'E F E[ 1"1
"ig3-sEl"lglHd
fi' il' P. B' i elg ''1fl e
I'
lE.
<q;rtrrfoOrJ.fr ,113aqagrf l- t'' f rlr q?q NO P'0r !r€ u' rl !IrtdE 3Ori:ilEiif sEEci:E 5s[68eE1:'";HIg A;r€€'r;f,lS.,H !.p$ F F--A[FE' rE.A E':5Fo r" i-ni _ i p cronn!2.
rEFi[:[Br rii lnalt- *'ttslilEfr ir[' EF$;iltg-e rp e; o -5 B.;i-;. A' _ f i:[titT;I F;H.."
.s,sr,r
r Ft:rF ;i!fr I rr,o .i:I : :ilt'a t' LtlH " : _eT'".-,tB E oB p, EIE3 98,, l.*"1€ - i'9gFPillF *li-i ln ess3-=r5tB fFo-io913 HriiE;IEg[!FslE gHH3;:lF
f;isllFlfi =l!l1r;la H;iBE:r:l[g;f,E s;;i;:lg;i";g*ijlE Ft'[q5'ilu *ilefifrFvr' <iflE tr1l; x.s g'gtF a 5'€'r
-B !'-' iq i [g'g r: " t Rslq fi +if! ]i;fii;;;; Ii;ir;* srntxl:if,ni:;lE s;;rE:r
f;Eg€[:H B:9I$s3, +'silEE:l-.st:;lE EBaHHtR,! afi rrr[s: iE;iHie [g;gH[tfi[?iil; *FHEg[:i rtnsE_a[ :;:*"*ip aH'rAE:]gfr#EXl; gslirp"H'.a o o Fg ?Tfi: &q; n sHr,[]5H t* i FEIE ;;; B'€
"-sH* E i[; [g 6l! U'.,'e.- -.6 E H r.o ro "'',4 o Fslz ri'r '' n e'.
t-, i 3 '"€ b, 'aq r * q r B;pi g;n lrEJ:8lE ;':it 3:€Ei;Hg;3i Ili;nIg ;[=!;Iii ;iiqi;sl:a ifiFs;EI-hr-onr, -boo _[ :ugTFI 5'EEEEii fiFeg*gi"EHfXB*t' HF'EAEi' -1 '.nrrbTi ''tii5inrop' !FnHry'.<=tb -.b*FJlii H"'r'q I' [iF.'qB5'F E$tcEQqg'-gl;; ;'F' E'B'&.q8.5' i98gI[8lFB-F[d Ea;IE-' ]*i;9il;F lssi:lF txqIiifF;,:alls :rq];rsBE;p:;q1s Hul+lf, 18iIE:H;Efit:fr4 H3[F[:;
HE{!r rgH' iplf=g qf;BFgsgfl$fi.F3g"t F;i;Er,
eF*_[a I # g f E H? ; L- [Ci;.;a .l -; r, *,o'h -
tOOH|O fi tD rr uY
'5 P.>l
F'IP.ooFt0cffo!'
>gtrtIA
.1""1' ,. ,. )i. ''"..,
;ifa.,F;fs,8iln$ ;';r'l{:ffi#j.i, ,"tW
.at ''.. ':,-..
rz3ih-z
,.:.s .'Eg.fil
E F,ii: fi, i;'i;iifJit!
S F pFflp;:; :[|{*,.s'f i"1"""!1'1'r*'
3 B -HFl"r: a gd1 "'1i';ii:'1';::..
,:;:,,'!!' .i''.s i',E[FF g Fi' l';flffi;9, i;'i ",.iifJiiil
r{ P.€otn5.o0r9<P.o ts.i (/l \o
{P"P.0r o9< 5
@
Fn CJ lU,C Fh olFlPFiH<Ho lFlo rtlF
rtr n iil)o H{ itFl O oll-{
o < F{lH
:] lF:AlO('Jl<I hcr .-ortriCo ;'3 HFho O 5h u<oOrt!Jocr Prt = ctH.. o< e-
Orr'd o |''.FtcooFt54rrts.ooOFh
P. rl
(, Ft<
, Et,F''flrf;EI f,qFi.l; I € rT"*T E E [.$l-r.-t
j B Eilrr-* n-r\o ir. t-t r-'bl- t-. o O
X rt 3ll 5 vv\/ Hv $ 5'opF (,)
F,. 5 ogtFtl-r ct o \lt-'. t-t p. r-t Ft l-n o lil. o o cr Fot. C . lt , ,' vt 'o ll. 5 r-r[ 3'l.h: P.o ol o,. '..: ,: rtr ! 'l€l 5 l ''1...'. t,. rol fi :'
o o ts o P.l Fh c) E rtlia " ,,", .."1g sl[.F.6l\s
trlXr,:c)dFI
U,
o
HI
rT
H.
an
hr
Fnlr\''lfl
Y
FN
c)rro t-.P trlOF<
FtF)>o- c,,lou)
Fc)H.Hg>
ts'HrrtIo(no.-
H.\tt
@o
PHFltfr'p-
ort g!
Vt
H..o.
t', . 'c:
. f-?
F. ::: ;
c:
I
- v l f; e"ll-r 'i! E E EEE F
11" F H f8E: " EgZ
l[ EF ;iri , :#iFNffi *I-TFE
EF la [,rr fFflril\:re IflNxg
,;,, iT":|;',
',i['ul
;, ffi{$E-E [Ni
1,
,,1 , iEie
HI Hi qfr i rrl|t::
'l ' oro gl Rr I E rf
I o' o n rE rt tr' t't!C) E4R ;a k o<a '<
t"-'
oo{n9TOP.gooo;'o Fnrtoocr:to 'rpo
H(,JP=f
0)
H
Pftl Ftl I Ftto
t5,-
a
i1)o 31631
'',r,'318'731|
3ii,?.el,r:lHi'"
rrll
O '.. r'i rsT R AT lO N
f rt 241
irJ l:,' A L 5:lEL r-ER
gr-a :19 2
AS5:5?Ri.::02
c' r nlljc lNi:I{ji ciror'l
Ert ?16 or 229
CL..RK &
iiCC::DER
E't 217
COUNTY
AT TO R T'.JE Y
Ext 242
ENGINEER
Ext 236
ENVIRONI.IENTAL
HEALTH
Ext 238
EXTENSION
AG ENT
Ext 247
LIBRARY
Ext ?55
PUBLIC HEALTH
Ea qle Ext 252
vair 476-5844
PLANNING
Ext ?26 o( 229
PURCHA5ING/
PER50N.NEL
Ext 245
ROAO & BRIDGE
Exl 257
SHER IFF
Eaole Ext 2l I
aziall 927 -3244
Gilman 82 7-5 7 5l
50c tAL SERV lcEs
328-6328
3 itne 1980
!.lorgan Consttuct ion Conpang
J im !'lotgan
P. O- Box 2270
Vai7, CoTotado 81657
.,Re : ;':lei c":€t t to the Frel ininarg PUD
The l'ai 7eg II
t:e have reviewed Vout proposed adjustrilents to The Va77eq Phase II
(su-6-7g-P) wnicn incLiaeZ; (1) a t:eduction in number of units from
28to26;(2)theadditionofasr'tir'mingpooT;(3)ash.i-f.tingofthe
parking lot (4) " ^i'o' telocation of CweTTing units'' (5) a change
in the unit mjx. (teu-Znlrctu'") ' we f intl these ptoposed changes
to constitute a minot charge to the PD ana herebg apptove this
adninisttative change conditionaT upon submittal of finaT site pTan'
If gou have ang questions ' pTease contact this office '
of PLanning
./'./L //4".'y'/ K .'.7"-V
I'/"4t'('()
rettilt xnig\{.
Director of PTanning
TREASURER
Ext 201
?-.---.=^-
Thomas Boni
essistant Director
rB/kp
iL
COUNTY
Devel ooment
x 179
, coLoRADO 81631
303/328-73t I
,O OF COUNTYv SSIONER5
!41
TMINISTRATION
tt 241
March 20, .|980
James Morgan
Morgan Construction Co.
P. 0. Box 2210
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Jim:
I apologize for not attending our pre-arranged
meeting.
In reviewing your proposed changes to Phase II of
The Valley P.D., the Planning Department considers those
to be of minor character and request that you submitfinal revised drawings show'ing these changes for our
review. }Je are in general agreement with the concept
you presented.
Our records show that the original approval was for
28 units and 33,7'14 sq. ft. It is also our understanding
that your drawings will show the deletion of two units
and an increase in the qross floor area of between 200 -
300 sq. ft.
Please submit parking plan including disposition of
spaces within structure.
Respectfully yours,
i4.-'--''- 4' E -""
Thomas A. Boni
Asst. Director of Planning
TAB/ncm
ANIMAL SHELTER
949-4292
ASSE550 R
Ext 202
BUILDING IN
I NSPECTI O N
Ext 226 ot 229
CLERK &
RECOROER
Ext 2l7
COUNTY
ATTORNEY
Ext 242
ENG IN EE R
Ext 235
ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH
Ext 238
EXTENSIO N
AGENT
Ext 247
LIBRARY
Ext 255
PUBLIC HEALTH
Eagle Ext 252
Vail 476-5844
PLANNING
Ext 226 or 229
PU RC HASI NG /
PERSONNEL
Ext 245
ROAO & BRIDGE
ExI 257
5HERIFF
Eaole Ext 2l I
Baialr 927-3244
Gilman 82 7-5 751
sOCIAL 5ERVICES
328-6328
TREASURER
Ext 201
l{:::'!Y-
i
llSacrllO 'f^d fi,.
C\tgrdrn0
btv,',r"\"0 ^?$
lnttn u
.75 3outh fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
.
(303) 476-7000
February ll, '1985
olllce of communlly development
Peter Feistmann
P.0. 8ox 2438
Vail, Colorado 81558
Re: Phase II, The Va1ley
Dear Peter,
I am writjng to confirm the information that I gave you over the phone
::::::!l:s.ln::: il"l::""l.:: l?' x'l l'{"lk:*1.lllt-DqelEst.,%s(arJ,:CAccording to our records, Phase II, A is approximatel5r
Phase IIA and B was oriqinall-y approved for 28 units hiPhase IIA and B was origina'l1y approved for 28 units having 33,714 squarefeet of GRFA. Th'is information is listed in a letter dated March 10, 1980.
In a document dated February 19, 1981 , "Proposed Zoning for West Vail
Annexation Area," Phase II, Tracts A and B was approved for 26 units
with an allowed GRFA of 32,909 square feet. The Vai'l Conrnunity Development
Department considers these figures to be the accepted development statisticsfor Phase II. Our records do not show a breakdown of units for Tracts
A and B which make up Phase II. Town of Vai'l records a'l so show that
6 units have been constructed on Phase II and are presently called "Grouse
G'len." Six foundations also exist on Phase II.
The Valley was developed as a Planned Unit Development that used Residentia'l
Cluster zoning as a guide. The intention of this project was to develop
multi-fami'ly dwellings using a c'lustered site plan approach. In general ,
the subdividing of an individual phase of a planned unit development
is not encouraged. In answer toyourquestion of whether.or not it would
be possible to subdivide Phase II, Tract A into two prinary/secondary'lots, the planning staff would like to see a more detailed site pl an
in order to determine if this wou'ld be appropriate. The staff would
be concerned that the project constructed on Phase II, Tract A wou'l d
be compatib'le with the remaining portion of Phase II, Tract B'located
across the road. The idea of a pl anned unit development is that the
project should work as a who'le and a'lso ref'lect a continuity in the
architecture and site planning found anong al I the phases of the project.
The staff does not encourage the subdividing of individual phases.
'Peter Feistmann
February ll, 1985
Page Two
However. qiven the fact that Phase II, Tract A is across the road from
Phase li,'Tract B, there may be a possibility that it cou'ld be developed
separaieiy. In the report dated April 18, 1979 addressed to Jeff Burleson
coircerninq the drainage on Phase II of The Valley' it is evident that
some tyDe of.drainage system would have to be constructed on Tract A.
At thii'time it is imPossjb'le to determine what kind of drainage work
would be needed for Tract A wjthout a detailed site plan. The most
important point is that drainage work would probably have to be comP'leted'
ani ii wouia need to function in a compatible way with Tract B across
the sireet. Planning and Environmental Corunission approvals wou'ld a'l so
be necessary if it wEre determined that it wou'ld be a feasible idea
to develop Tract A seParatelY.
I hooe this information wi'l'l be helpfu'l to you. unfortunately, our
fitei ao not provide detailed p1 ans that could answer a1 'l your questions
at this tine.' If you have further questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,.
.l:
1 ,'-' L',, t''l-,ir '. --
Kristan Pritz
Town P'lanner
KP: br
J0RGEltSElt A]ilt HEltDRtct(soil, HG.
CO'VSUI T'NG ENG'NEEFS & ARCH'TECTS
THFEE PABK CENTRAL, SUITE 625 . 1515 ARAPAHOE STBEET
DENVER, COLORAOO 8o2O2 o (303) 571{100
TO:
Eagle Co. Building Deot.
Fa gle. Co - 81631
Date
GENTLEMEN:
We are sendlng
E tracings,
as follows:
E herewith E under
E specificatlons,
separate cover, E prints,
E shop drawlngs
E photostats,
E No Exceptions Taken tr Make Corrections Noted O Revise and Resubnit E Supersedes
undations Val I e Lions Ridqe Devel .
Vai'l . Colorado
No.
Coples Description
Drawing
No.
Made
By
Latest
Date
1 Report (above)
Constructi on
o
o
tr
Please send copies
Sub-Contractor
to: E copies have been sent to: E Contractor
E Owner E Suppller E Archltect
tr OtherAs requlred
SENT BY:
tr
o
o
E
Blueprinter
Engineers,
Recetver's
MaiI
Messenger
Messenger
Very truly yours,
]ORGENSEN AND HENDRICKSON, INC.
Consulting Engtneers
By MYron Stein
A.
Buffer Creek Road (Eagle County Secondary Road VV-l)
Traffic Ana'lYsis
General
Proposed development of "The Val 1ey" served by Upper Buffer Creek
Road has prompted investigation of the impacts of traffic volumes
generated by the proposed development. Traffjc data for this investi-
gation was based upon criteria developed in "Eagle County Traffic Survey,"
revised 2/5/80, and "Inventory of Dwel'l ing Units in Eag'l e County'
Colorado," 12/31 /79. Des'ign parameters and recormendations are based
upon:I) "Roadway Design Manual", Co'lorado Department of H'ighways'
January, .|980.
2) "A Po1 icy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways," American
Association of State Highway 0fficials, .|965.
3) "Geometric Design Guide for Local Roads and Streets," American
Association of State Highway Officials, November 7, 1970.
4) "Highway Engineering," Wright and Paquette, .l979, Wi'l ey & Sons.
Present'ly, the Buffer Creek Road system consists of three princ'ipa1
roads and severa'l minor roads. Upper Buffer Creek Road whi ch serves
"The Va11ey", Lions Ridge Road and Chanonix Lane are the principal roads
and their relat'ionship is shown 'in Figure l. Current deve'lopment has
caused numerous complaints from residents near the intersection of
Buffer Creek Road and the north frontage road. These complaints center
around excessive speed on Buffer Creek Road and pedestrian hazard due
to increased traffic at this 'location. Approximately 30 units now
occupy "The Valley" and the primary complaint from these residents
has been the inabjlity of county snow removal operat'ions to keep more
than one'lane open on Upper Buffer Creek Road during winter.
Traffic
The map in figure I shows Buffer Creek Road (VV-l), Chamonix Lane
(VS-6), and Lion's Ridge Road (VA-7) and their relationships to one
another. Buffer Creek Road intersects the north frontage road of I-70
about % mi'l e east of the West Vai'l interchange. Present subdivisions'
proposed subdivisjons, and ex'i sting zoning make possible a prediction
of the number of residential units that will be afforded access by each
of the aforementioned road systems. This predict'ion does not attempt
to take account of such factors as future'l and exchanges, future zoning
changes or new road construction that may take p"l ace.
Number of Residential Units Afforded Access
Upper Creek Road
.I67 units
.|73 units
436 units
P
Lion's Ridge Road
Buffer Creek Road @intersection
wi th North Frontage Road
Q wrs $rlryo Er Maay
Qet)gaaprgly
srffir- HAtflI Rno
4lFFER CREEK RUD SYSTEI4
FIWRE I
o
At the present time, residential developments of the type and
density existing and proposed generate an average of 9 vehic;le trips
(one-way) per day per unit. This figure was developed from the
traffic survey referenced in Appendix 1. As the density of the area
served by Buffer Creek Road and the Vail area as a who'l e increase,
these trips per day may increase. The volatile fuel situation may also
eventually decrease vehic'l e usage by the average driver so a figure
of 9 trips per day is probably reasonable for the forseeable future.
l. Upper Buffer Creek Road
0ne-hundred sixty seven (.|67) units served by Upper Buffer Creek
Road will generate 1503 trips per day (ADT) with an expected design
hourly volume (DHV) of about 12 percent or I80 vehicles per hour. The
Colorado Highway Department suggest using 16 percent of the average
daily traffic as an estimate of the des'ign hourly volume, however,
12 percent was the figure derived from the Eagle County Traffic Survey
and will be used here.
Using the Colorado Department of Highways Geometric Design
Standards such a traffic volume would require the fo1 lowing roadway
geometry.
Geometric Design Type C
Pavement type medium (3 to 5 inches of b'ituminous pavement)
No. of lane 2
Lane width ll feet
Shoulder w'idth 6 feet
Design speed 40 to 60 mph
maximum grade 11 percent
R.0.W. width 60 feet m'inimum
Maximum degree
of curve 19.0 (30 mph)
Minumum radius 300 feet
The above referenced criteria wou1 d be the geometry that the road
should be built to if it were to be constructed from scratch and carry
the ADT of 1500 and DHV of '180.
The present capacity of the Upper Buffer Creek Road may be calculated
by determining the fol1ow'ing physical properties of the existing roadway.
l. Possib'l e Capacity 2'000 vehicles per hour..t2. 0perating Capacity '1,500 vph (gS to 40 mph)'3. 80% restricted sight diStance 299 vph
in mountainous terrain;z Lane
width = I0 feet; 3% trucks G
oeak hour.4. Lateral clearance to obstruction 209 vph
0 feet (no shoulders)
'l
'Optimum capacity seems to be at about 27 to 28 miles per hour,,'"Roadway Analysis," Kent Rose, 1980.
-2-
The capacity derived above (209 vehicles per hour) was predicated
on a design speed of 40 miles per hour. Several of the curves on the
existing roadway limit the advisable speed to around 15 mph which will
decrease the capacity by l0 percent. The numerous access po'ints existing
and proposed for the Upper Buffer Creek Road will also adversely affect
the capacity because these accesses will not allow uninterrupted flow
of traffic. Uninterupted flow of traffic is the basic premise upon
which al'l values for capacity were developed and the quantitative
effects of violation of this basic assumption are not easily discern-
able but it can only decrease the capacity of a given roadway. The
present capacity of the Upper Buffer Creek Road is probably somewhat
less than .|80 vehicles per hour.
The fol'low'ing are recormended improvements to the Upper Buffer
Creek Road.
I. Increase shoulder widths to not less than 4 feet and preferably
6 feet on each side of present roadwa-y. This would bring the
roadway up to present local road standards and wi'l 1 provide
ample capacity for development both in the short and the longterm. Increasing the shoulder width wi'l I also prolong the
economic life of the bituminous pavement by providing adequate
lateral support for the pavement edge and by providing snow
storage for snowplow operations wh'i ch presently severely re-strict the roadway width in the winter.2. Provide signing, meeting the requirements of the Manuel of
Unifonn Traffic Control Devices, to rall curves whose rad'iusis less than 300 feet, stating the advisable speed limit and
curve warning.3. Provide an overlay of the bituminous paved surface of the
existing roadway. A l" hot asphalt over'lay or a 3/4 inch
chip seal would be adequate.
2. Lower Buffer Creek Road
Lower Buffer Creek Road, south of the intersection of Lion's Ridge
Road, will provide access to 173 units from hion's Ridge, 167 units from
"The Valley," and 96 units from Chamonix Lane for a total of 436 units.
The average daily traffic (ADT) below the intersection of Upper Buffer
Creek Road and Lion's Ridge Road is projected to be:
340 units 0 9 trips/day/unit = 3060 vehicles/day
Design Hourly Volume = 3060 x'12 percent = 367 vehicles/hour
Using the Geometric Design Standards of the Colorado Highway Department
and the following parameters;
DHV = 367
Passing Sight Distance = B0% restricted
Average Grade = 5% or Greater
Percentage of Trucks = 3%
-3-
suggest the geometry of the roadway should be:
number of lanes - 2
lane width = 12 feet
shoulderwidth =$ feet
This geometry closely resembles the Eagle County classification of
collector road.
3. Intersection of North Frontage Road and Buffer Creek Road
The intersection of Buffer Creek Road and the north frontage
road of I-70 will receive the fo'l 'l owing traffice volumes from
Buffer Creek Road.
436 units G 9 trips/day/unit = 3924 vehicles/day
DHV = 3924 x 12 percent = 47'l vehicles per hour
No data is available from Eagle County concerning the present
average daily traffic or hourly volumes present at the subject
intersection. It is estimated that present peak hourly volumes
range from 30 to 50 vehicles per hour at peak hour periods which
are probably 7:30 to 9:30 am and 4:00 to 5:30 pm.
The fo1'lowing is the criteria used by the Colorado Highway
Department to determine when right or 'l eft turning lanes and acceler-
ation/deceleration lanes should be incorporated into an intersection
desi gn.
"Speed change lanes for right turning movements are required
according to the following:"
Posted Speed of Highway in MPll
If the DHV of 25 30 to 40 45 to 50 55 For a:
the highway 500 400 200 100 two .lanewill exceed: hiqhwa.y
the total DVH
of the access 50 40 20 l0 two lane
approach will highway
exceed _
The intersection requ'i res the following modifications in orderto mitigate the effects of present traffic and future developrnent.
l. Addition of a left turn lane from eastbound north frontaqe
road to Buffer Creek Road;
2. Addition of right turn/deceleration lane from westbound frontage
road to Buffer Creek Road;
-4-
3. Addition of right turn lane from Buffer Creek Road to
westbound fiontage road.
Geometry for these intersection modifications should comply with
Colorado Highway Department design standards.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Upper Buffer Creek Road
l. Before further development commences, Upper Buffer Creek
Road should be widened by the addition of 6-foot graveled
shoul ders.
2. The existing pavement surface shou'ld be overlayed by I 'inch
of hot asphalt, preferably.
3. These improvements should be funded entire'ly by the
developers requesting approval of new subdivjsions, on
a proportionate share basis. Public funds should not
be committed.
4. Signing should be applied at all curves with a design
speed of less than 30 miles per hour.
5. Stop s'igns should be installed on Buffer Creek Road at
the Lions Ridge Road and Chamonix Lane intersections to
control speed on the Lower Buffer Creek Road.
Lower Buffer Creek Road
l. Lower Buffer Creek Road should be classified as a collector
road and brought up to collector standards before develop-
ment along Lions Ridge Road begins. These standards
should be '12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot shoulders at
a minimum.
2. Pedestrian safety measures such as the addition of curbs
and sidewalks along with school bus turnouts shou'ld be
installed from the Chamonix Lane intersection to the
intersection with the north frontaqe road.
Intersection of Buffer Creek Road and North Frontage Road
l. The following channelization at the intersection should
be installed.
a. Add left turn lane from eastbound frontage road to
Buffer Creek Road.
-5-
b. Add right turn/deceleration lane from westbound
frontage road to Buffer Creek Road.
c. Add right turn lane from Buffer Creek Road to north
frontage road.
-6-
.EAGI.E'COUNTY
Engineer DePartment
P. 0. Box 850
EAGLE, COLORADO 81ffiT
TELEPHONE 303/328-731I
BOARO OF COUNTY
coMMtSSloNERS
Ext 241
ADMINISTRATION
Ext 241
ANIMAL SHELTER
949-4292
A5SE550 R
Ext 2O2
April 8, l9B0
BUILDING IN
INSPECTION
Ext 226 ot 229
CLERK &
RECOROER
Exl217
COUNTY
ATTORNEY
Ext 242
ENGINEER
Ext 236
ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH
Ext 238
EXTE N 5IO N
AG ENT
Ext 247
LIBRARY
Ext 255
PUBLIC HEALTH
Eagle Ext 252
Vail 476-5844
PLAN N I NG
Exl. 226 or 229
PURCHASING/
PERSONNEL
Ext 245
ROAO & BRIDGE
Ext 257
SHERIFF
Eaq le Ext 2l I
Baialr 927-3244
Gilman 82 7-5 75I
SOCIAL SERVICES
328-6328
TREASURER
Ext 20 |
Richard A. Todd
P. 0. Box .1753
Vajl, Colorado 8.|657
Subject: Selby Subdivision - Eagle County
Dear 14r. Todd:
This letter is in reply to your letter to Tom Boni
dated l'larch 28, 1980. I wjll attempt to relate to you the
rationale and intent of some of the items in the subdivision
regulations of Eagle County as they apply to the Selby
Subdivision. First, concerning ut'i lity stub outs, let me
say that Eagle County and the engineering department in
particular has had considerable experience urith road cuts,
i.e., cuts within public right-of-way, and all the experience
has been bad. Utility taps that must be made by crossing
into the right-of-way but not crossing roadways have been
nearlyasmuch trouble as utjlity taps that actually cut the
roadway surface. Transverse cuts of dra'inage ditches
invariably disrupt drainage and cause ponding or at times'
tunneling, by diverting roadvJay drainage to an unanticipated
course. Cut and fil'l s'lopes along the roadvray have also been
adversely affected by transverse cuts and in some cases
slope instability has resulted. I will be more than happy
to take you on a tour of road cuts in the Va'il area which
would graphically illustrate the public concern. l'le would
very much like to see all uti'l ities stubbed out at least to
property lines and eliminate unnecessary work and problems
in the public right-of-wa-v.
Concerning the intersection detail you have been requested
to provide on lour drawings, please refer to figures l(a) and
l(b) enclosed. This figure shows a vehicle similar to a school
bus or trash truck negotiat'ing an intersect'ion with a lS-foot
radius. The bus either must use all the opposite roadway to
make his turn, creating a hazardous situation, or use the
shoulder of the intersection causing pavement breakage as it
leaves and returns to the pavement. The single unit (SU)
des'ign vehicle (school bus or trash truck) will undoubtedly
frequently use the intersection in the Se1 by Subd'i vision and
should control jntersection design.
I
I
R
\9
I]GURE I &L
-J-
Listed below are design guidelines that should aid in the design
of intersections for the types of roadways encountered.
l. "Geometric Design Guide for Local Roads and Streets",
American Association of State Highvray 0fficials'
llovember, 1970.
2. "Roaduray Design l{anual", Colorado Department of Highways,
January, .l980.
Quot'ing from reference l{o. l:
"At street intersect'ions in residential areas and elsewhere
where there are heavy pedestrian movements the mjnimum
radius of curb return where curbs are used, or the
outside edge of pavement where curbs are not used, should
be 15 feet. Desireabl a minimum radius of 30 feet
should be used."
The Colorado Department
of 50 feet shall be used and
]s r,reTfTTlustrated in fiqure
A copy of my evaluation of
In that report I did not attemptsibilities. That decision is up
Eagle County. If you have any
to discuss it w'ith you.
Highways states that a minimum radius
reason for both of these recornmendations
the Upper Buffer Creek Road is enclosed.
to delineate each developer's respon-
to the Board of County Commissionet"s of
questions on that report, I will be happy
of
the
1t.
The pavement structure informatjon submitted by Mr. Rose is
adequate for the short cul-de-sac road that is proposed for the Selby
Suvdjvisjon. However, I much prefer a rational design process such as
those based on Hveem testing procedures and which incorporate axle
loads and structural strength of materials into the design process.
If you plan to do future work on roadways in the County other than
short cirt-Oe-sacs, please be informed that the type of analysis presented
for the Selby Subdivision will probably not be acceptable.
The reference made to Seelye's Data Book for CjY'i I Fngineers - Design'
which indicates an acceptable vertical grade of 1/2 \0-5) percent is
reasonable, although drainage ditches will not flovr water at this
gradient without constant maintenance. Please revise your road profile
drawings to show this. Presently the grade at center ljne between
station 3+00 and 8+00 js 0.05 percent which according to your reference
is inadequate.
The subdjvision regulations state that roadway structure "...shall
be designed by a registered soil engineer to withstand the loads_ anticipated
on the iubgrade matirial present." I contacted Hans Froesche of Chen and
Associates in Glenwood Springs and discussed the proposed roadway in relation
to the soil work performed by his firm and to the soils present on the
site. As stated herejnbefore, the information presented by Mr. Rose 'i s
adequate for the roadway froln station 0+00 to B+00. However, if it is
your intention to continue a private drive from the cul-de-sac at
-4-
station 8+{Xl on to provide access to other lots, please be informed that
the soils vnrk provided by Chen and Associates must be supplemented
by further investigations before approval will be recormended to the
Board of County Commissioners.
The Board of County Conunissioners of Eagle County makes a'll decisions
relative to the subdivision process, so p'leaie bear that in m:iiTwhen
review'ing these recormendations.
o
Yours truly,
i///hD€.0fr"if
ile'lton E. Atwe'll
Eagle County Engineer
!.'lEA/ncm
Encl osures
xc: Tom Boni
Board of County
Kent Rose
Cornmi ssioners /./)
EAGLE ]NTV
fimterofff,ee mncmn@ramdumn
To:
Memorandum to the File
Subiects
Parking Space Count
From:
Tom Boni
File No.:
Valley Phase II
Dater
February I, I98O
Units available in parking structure for phase If.
Upper Level 5 spaces Existing
Mid Level 10 spaces
44 on p-p.
136 otr drawinss and in building.
7O spaces required for 28 units.
11 spaces (additional) will be required
which were not included in the plans
Cunninqham.
cc: Jim Cunningham
Ron Lustig
to be provided
subrni tted by
. lp'
{I l- rts- -r'.t e
0a1tY,{ tt+r.1--'
,dJ
62arrse G/e
(D
o)u,(3
L'
o)
c)c)tnc,E
uJ (t
=coU'O
^oH{i;J^oq()
H3an Z.6Gut c-EU,-8U'AEBH&'zJ6(,fr.\
z lrj
6-Zz u.l8?
9zUE5frntZ69;c{2co
uJ
oo
ccooJ
uJ
April iB,'1979
Chi lilress Livaudais
1523 1/2 9th Street
g3n1,gp, C0 BA?02
hTlll: tlr. Jeff Burleson
RE: Drainage - The Va]ley (Phase-2)
Lions [idge DeveloPneni' Vail
Gentl ernen:
As per Your iequest we have
above referenced subiect so
at this even'ings meeiing of
Cor:inission.
done sorne addi-uiona'l research inio the
that t'le might better address the subiect
the Eagle County Pianning and Zoning
93
=(oF-JX)ot'ctzBd
0n ihis daie I rnade a site inspect'i on of the.prope'cty and lne'l ttiih
iii"-b"v"toprr, l,lr. .lim Cunninghain on site 1nd d'iscussed sona irro-
posed inprovemenis,
I have altached thi ee sketches of arcas of concern r'rithin th-'
i"t'.jJrtrn.nt. 0n the i'irst shaet i have identificd 'ihe areas by
;il;;; ;iihin triangular shaped figures ai'id '."jili discuss th:rn
inciividuallY as fol lows :o.
rirea I
There is present1y in.p'!ace 'incler.Lions Ridge t-oop loui^1 pipe-arch
;;i;;ri: 'ii,i up-proiiiniiu dirrensions are 4t" span -by 33". r'ise. This
nine-.is more thair' ailequate 'co carry. the run-off lrhich njght be ex-
["li.o-ti-G ;;;;";i;,]-irom the :mill contyibuiine drain.rge area to
iiri"iiri-tp"iilii.ifv-F[as: q). I t':ou]c recorcmend t-hat the e:<istins
il;"-;;-.i-gct'.ect 'atren-inou "o'er allows 'io be sure that it is clean
Itii-,rnaam"SeA. i ,lould fur"iher recor,im:nd that conci^eia lrea''! r';a'l ls
u.-initoilio on both ends oi the pipe for end prot.:ciion.
4.
:aa.
I'ir. Je if Burl esan
April i8, 1979
Page Ttio
llhere this rirainagaway crosses the proposed 44 car parking iot I
wou'ld reconnend ihe use of the same s'ize pipe under ihe parking
area and aga'in rviih ends protected by head vralls.
Since the <lrainaE:way will be dry niost of the iine its treatmenb asit crosses pedesirian ways is really up to ycurself. Either a tlooden
footbridge ,;rith an open area of approxirnately 8 square feeL (height
of 2 feet and r'iicth of 4 feet) or simply a slale crossing the pEd-
estrian area vouid be adequate.
0n Sheel:2 atlached I have sketche,l ihe irbnve described improvelnents.
Area 2
As opposed to Area 1, Area 2 has a fairly laiEe drainage area.
Previous caicula;ions by our firn for this pi^ojeci indicaierJ an
area of l25 acres and a peak est,irnaied discharge of 208 c.f.s. for
a ICC-year stcri:l.
Tha: e are, pi"esenily nc faci'lities for bringing that run-oi"f fi^om
the llorth ic lhe Scuth:ii: of tlte Lions RidEe l-ortp Rcad-
I recornr;lend ihai provisions for rrin-rrff coi'rLrcl b: irrsial led as shown
on Sheei 3 aitached, which consists oF rock ljned channels and a pair
of 12" culr.,eris ('rrith hea<!,ila1'l s) un,Jer^ the Licns P.idge l-ocp Road.
Our prcposed chann,ol r,rou'ld fall ini;o a'l ignment';lith tha clra'inageways
as shown on your plan arrd designated as snal'l reclangles end to end.
l,l: wou'l d ,*63p1-,"errd that ihe rock '! ined channels be apprcx'imalely 4' in
rriCth and 2' C*zp. A.gain your pedestrian wa'lks and'landscaping could
span'uhe channels w,'th a sriall'ilooden fooi bridgre or again sirnply use
sllajes ior fcr^d ci ossings since again tl:ase iraiitagarr;ays viill be dry
except duri ng exiremely heavy run-oif. 0bviously drainageways should
be kept as fa: a,'ray from buildings as is possibla and you have sho'tn
ihat on your plans
Area 3
Although Area 3 is not a part of Phase 2I did examine it today.
There is presently a sma'|1 retention/sedimentrtion pond just above
(East) of 'uhe Lions Ridge Loop Road. It has a 15" C.l,l.P. pipe over-
flow and a low point which vrould act as an energency spillr'ray, both
a
I'lr. Jeff Burleson
April lB,'1979
Phge Thrie
on the iiorth end of the embankineni. Both empiy into a ditch bei.r.;een
the road and ennbankment.' That ditch ends about 35' South at a pipe-
arch culvert approximately 49" span by 33" rise. The othsr end'oi
the cuivert empiies out into Buff:r' Creek.
It rvou'ld appear that the previous draingage calculations did not take
into consideration storage cjetent,ion in the sedimeniation basin. I
theret-are feel lhat one additional pipe of the same size p'laced just
above ihe existing pipe wcu'!d ad:quately handle the rnajor run-offperioCs. And again pipe end proteciion by use of headwalls is
reccnmended.
Aiso I noted to<lay some darnage in the lowar ten feei or so of tha
exisiing pipe. This should be corrected.
i niight also add that it is niy opjnion that any other clrainage liorth
of tha Lions Ridge Loop Road is and'lill continue to be adequately
handle,J by the borl^ow ditch on ihe llorth side of the road.
I f you have any quesl-ions, pleas: contact me.
l{, L: GFehamP.5.&1.S.
Zoning Con:rnission
liLG/ j 1w
xc: Eegle County P'lanning and
r' \.
\
. ,{.
"'\I
r,uti-iiT,-' RtveRrrln;froxLs.u fueq1
I
,
*^' , ..;
fHE VA LL€
VICINITY l\/AP
Nntr*-q-
, f,l"!S
l..t' '
--
/''Ptt':
-..
CrtR
...'
;
-{D
.. n.J: aM' \t l.\rn!t'
' l/\' i'//uIV'
t
\'
'. I'.,. i
..f:li2/- l,tt€O (r/.2t//YdL -:"
-7;J fd 1 I ti/ 4?l3// 7;€f,5
\
2
'l /_\
\.. i i !\....- -r, . -.---.- ,l {
-.2 2.. l/ ii!/€rtl?fry' t\
ol
DEPARTMENT OF COMMI.INITY DEVELOPMENTTOWNOFVAIL
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81557
970479-21fi
Investigation->
will call->
AddSqFf 120
#ofGasAppliances:0#ofGaslogs:0#of
. plan Check_> S1S5. 0O DRB Fee_--> g5O. 00 Additional Fees-->
SO. OO R€seation Fee--> S35.00 Total Pemrit Fee-> $459. 00
$3 . 00 Clean-uP DePosit->$0.00 Payments-> S459.00
TOTTAL FEES--> S45e . oo BALANCE DUE->
Approvals:I€dm: 05100 BUII-,DIIIG DEPARTMSNT
o7/27/2o0L GR:G Action: col[D still needs
Planning approval -see Allison.
O7/3O/2OO]- DF ACtiON: AP OK PER GARYIS
E-MAIIJ
Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARITIENI
3\\q s
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON TOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT Permit #: 801-0204
]ob Address.: 5024 MAIN GORE DR SOUTH VAIL Status.....: ISSLIED
Location......: 5024 MAIN GORE DRIVE Applied...: 07/23/2001.
Parcel No....: 209918209070 Issued ...: 07/30/200't
ProjectNo...: {OSot -ozq )/ Expires...: 07/26/2002
owNER BRUGTONT, JIr-,r, VACEK O7/23/2OOL Phone:
5825 S GII.,PIN CT
GREEN VII-,LAGE CO
80121
I_,icenge:
colffRjAcTOR Halstead & Associates o7/23/2OOL Phone- 97o-475-6450
953 Lionsridge Loop
Ste. 514
Vail, CO 8L657
L,icense z 664-9
APPI-,IcAIiflt Halstead & Assoc. 07 /23/2ooL Phone : 476-6450
953 Lrionsridge l-'oop, Suite 514
Vail , Co
81557
License:
Desciption:
Replace existing windows, add new window, replace siding.
Occupancy: R1 Multi-Family
TypeConstruction: V-1HR
TypeOccupancy: ??
Valuation: $13,300.00
Fireplace Informatioru Restsicd: Y
wood Pelleh 0Fffi"ffi|dr{{* FEE SUMMAITY
Bu dnlg-> $f85. O0 Restuarant Plan Review->SO - Oo Total Calculated Fees-> 9459 .00
$0. 00
s0 .00
PAGE2
Permit #: 801-0204
CONDITIONSOF APPROVAL
asoI07-3G200'1.Status: ISSUED
PerrritType: ADD/ALTMFBTIILDPERMT Applied: 07/23/2007
Applicane Halstead&Assoc. Issued: 07/30/200747ffi50 ToExpire 01/26/2002
Job Address: 5024 MAIN C,ORE DR SOUTH VAIL
Location: 5024 MAIN GORE DRIVE
ParcelNo: 209918209070
Description:
Replace existing windows, add new window, replace siding.
Conditions:
Cond:1.2
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQLIIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond:14
(BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALI-S,CEIUNG'AND FLOORS TO
BESEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL.
Cond:15
(BLDG.): SMOKE DETECTORSARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMSAND
EVERY STORY AS PER S8C.310.5.1 OF THE 1997 UBC.
Cond:1
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY
WORK CAN BE STARTED.
'ozlEolzo?
ao Action: AP
ITEM: O55OO FIRE DEPART!'EIU
IICN: O55OO PI'BIJIC WORIG
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an
acotate plot plan, and state that all the inforrration as required is correct. I agree to comply with the inforsration and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniforsr Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUESIS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 5
PM.
Send Clean-up Deposit To: N/A
SIGNATTJRE OFOWNER ORCONTRACTORFOR HIMSELF AND OVVNET
*'t* ** **+ +t'1.'. + +* + **a**+t a"t**+** * 't*+** ****++* * **+*l' a*+ +**t * ++ * +* * + +** **f* * **f + ** * * * | * ** **+** a *
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprirted on 07-30-200r et 16:13:16 0713012001
Statement
+l tl** + *'| t+ *'3* * + +* * ***** * ** *'|a* *l*+t* + + t +* * t ++l *+t *+*+ ***+ **+ * tf,** * * * + * ** **l **t * * * + * * ** + * ***
Statement Number: R00000114? Amount: $459.00 07 /30/2OO]-O4:11 PM
Payment Method: Check fniE: LC
Notation: #3893/galstead & Assoc
Permit No! 801-0204 Type: ADD/ALT MF BUIIJD PERMIT
Parcel No: 2 099182 09010
Site Address: 5024 MAIN GORE DR SOT,TH VAIIJ
I,ocation: 5024 MAIN GORE DRIVE
Totaf Fee6: $459.00
This Pa)ment: $459.00 TotaL ALIJ Prnta: 9459.00
Balance: 50.00
***f+****++*f**f*l**f+****t*,i**+++****+****f***+**+**f**t****f+****+** ******{.+****+*****+**'i
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descniotion Cunnent Pmts
BP OO1OOOO31111OO BUILD]NG PTRMIT FEES
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI,J FEES
PF OO1OOOO31123OO PLAN CHECK FEES
RF 111OOOO31127OO RECREATION FEES
t^lc OO1OOOO31128OO WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
185.00
s0.00
185. 00
36. 00
3.00
0riar
dr- nor er
1o A.
u'l
Building Permit #:
97 O- 479-2149 (Inspections)
TOW\I0?VAIL
75 S. Frontase Rd.
Vail, Colora-do 81657
ConbLt Assesrcrc Office at 970-328-864O or visit for Parcel #
Parcef # Zgq 162 OqO lO
rob Name: h,of{Fr{ {\ou6g cortu o +_to tffi**^r{ €o4s p6rrrk-. rArr-
Legal Description Lot: 1 Block: l Filing:subdivision: €+.R'tE- fu38
owners Name: t<4\J Fnb^l^\Address:W Phone: o7o +'7q .qbb1
Architec{Designer: fr{+Address: SOZA filft rN ffillPhone:4= 19
Engineer:r.(*Address:Phone:
Detailed description of work:Ae-n+tr r,^noloou.t6 Ae,ffrooer_ 6trft1t + u<
WorkClass: New( ) Addition( ) nemodel (/ Repair(/ oemo( ) Other( )
Work Type: Interior ( /) Exterior ( / Both (VJ Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) tlo (XJ
Type of Bldg.; Single-family ( ) Two{amily ( ) Multi-family (/ Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: l(O No. of Accommodation Units in this buildino:7Jo ?
No/TyDe of Fireplaces Existinq: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Loqs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burninq (4 lG
No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances (.F) Gas Loqs (fi Wood/Pellet (-.'T Wood Burninq (NOT ALLOWED)
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No ( /)Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No (tj
COMPTETE VATUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (Labor & Materials)
BUILDING: $ /0, 5O0 .ELECTRICAL: $ gOO. OO !OTHER: $
^
PLUMBTNG: $ 1_ Og o.MECHANICAL: $rorAL: $ .J+.qe0'tl1 Zoo-
REFUND CLEANUP DEPOSIT TO:
coNrRAcroR rNFoRMArroN cevta 7n q)b.ryzq
General Contractor:Contact and Phone #'s:
Q1o-*-lto.
Contractor Signature:
JUL 2 3 2001
Tqv-coM.DEV.
***************************************FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*************
'd.,4F :/everyonef orms/bldgperm
Io
c
4b
TA
1(
5t
lr,
\o^o
tl
N\N\.\
{Y$I\N\
S*N.NNS
NNNNR
'ffin@
"{o*l:::fu'{afit1;,7,')ut'
l#,'^"igffi^,
WWMh
57U I ---'
o
o
D
U
n
l
o
O
tr
a
D
[J
a
o
o
o
o
This Chsklist must be omoleted before a Buildino Permit aooliation is
accepted.
All pages of application is complete
Has DRB approval obtained (if required) Provide a copy of approval form
Condominium Association letter of approval attached if project is a Multi-Family complex
Complete site plan submitted
Public Way Permit application included if applicable (refer to Public Works checklist)
Staging plan included (refer to Public Works checklist) No dumpster.oarkinq or material storaoe
allowed on roadwavs and shoulderc without written aooroval
Asbestos test and results submitted if demolition is occurring
Architect stamp and signature (All Commercial and Multi family)
Full floor plans including building sections and elevations(4 sets of plans for Multi-Family and
Commercial)
Window and door schedule
Full structural plans, including design criteria (ie.loads)
Structural Engineer stamp and signature on structural plans (All Commercial and Multi Family)
Soils Report must be submitted prior to Footing inspection
Fire resistive assemblies specified and penetrations indicated
Smoke detectors shown on plans
Types and quantity of fireplaces shown
Appficanrs sisnature: - AIU/ffi
Date of submittal:
I0l'f'N
Department of Community Development
Project Namet \^t$€r"( \\ousfl c,odOo + t0
ProjectAddress: €t-f fnftrr.t 6o6€-Offrr,Ei5o4
Questions? Call the Building Team at 479-2325
F:/everyone/forms/bldperm2
Received By:
ra
o
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FMME
if this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works)
review and approval, a Planning Depaftment review or Health Department review, and a review
by the Building Department the estimated time for a total review will take as long as three (3)
weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits will have to follow the above
mentioned maximum requirements. ResidenUal and small projects should take a lesser amount
of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
departments with regard to necessary review, these projects may also take three (3) weeks to
review and approve.
Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. I also understand
that if the permit is not picked up by the expiration date, that I must still pay the plan check fee
and that if I fail to do so it may affect future permits that I apply for.
Agreed to by:rtl$rKF $:rn-6-@
Project Name:
Date: -l ' \-? ' Ot
Print name
Signature
F:everyone/forms/bldperm3
TOWN0F
WHEN A *PUBLIC WAy PERMIT" rS REQUTRED
PLEASE READ AND CHECK OFF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS REGARDING THE NEED FOR A*PUBLJC WAY PERMIT":
B
a
D
a
D
Is this a new residence? YES NO
Does demolition work being performed require the us9 of the Right-of-Way, easements or
public property? YES- NO-l-
Is any utility work needed? YES
Is the driveway being repaved?
NO
YES NO
Is a different access needed to the site other than the existing driveway? YES_ NO
NO
Is any drainageJof"'nn done that affects the Right-of-Way, easements, or public property?
D
n
Is a "Revocable Right-of-Way Permit" required?YES
Is the Right-of-Way, etsements or public property to be used for staging, parking or fencing?YES NO ./
If:nswer is NOjs a yrkine, staging or fencing plan required by Public Works?
If you answered YES to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permit" must be obtained.
"Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's office or at Community
Development (a sample is attached). If you have any questions please call Leonard Sandoval in Public
Works at 479-2L98.
I HAVE READ AND ANSWERED ALL THE ABOVE QUESNONS.
7ill[W,l,frl
Job or Project
Date Signed:
Contractor Signature
Name: V\DAFnt ttou6e_lt t0
F i I ev ery one I f orms I bldpenn4
Company Name
TVWNOF
PUBLIC WORKS AND THE PUBLIC WAY PERMIT PROCESS
How it relates to Building Permits:
Fill out the attached check list with the Buildino Permit Application.
If yes was answered to any of the questions then a "Public Way" permit is required. You
can pick up an application at either Community Development, located at 75 South Frontage
Road or Public Works, located at 1309 Elkhorn Drive.
Notice sign-offs for utility companies. ALL utilities must field verifi7 (locate) respective
utilities prior to signing application. Some utility companies require up to 48 hours notice to
schedule a locate.
A construction traffic control/staging plan must be prepared on a separate sheet of paper,
An approved site plan may also be used. This plan will show locations of all traffic control
devices (signs, cones, etc.) and the work zone, (area of construction, staging, etc.). This
plan will expire on November lst and will need to be resubmitted for consideration for
approval through the winter. Be aware that your resubmission for winter may be denied
depending on the location of construction.
Sketch of work being peformed must be submitted indicating dimensions (length, width
and depth of work). This may be drawn on the traffic control plan or a site plan for the job.
Submit completed application to the Public Workt office for review. If required, locates will
be scheduled for the Town of Vail electricians and irrigation crew. The locates take place in
the morning, but may require up to 48 hours to perform.
The Public Workt Construction Inspector will review the application and approve or deny
the permit. You will be contacted as to the status and any requirements that may be
needed. Most permits are released within 48 hours of being received, but please allow up
to one (1) week to process.
As soon as the permit is approved, the Building Department will be notified, allowing the
"Building Permit" to be released. Please do not confuse the "Public Way Permit" with a
"Building Permif'.
NOTE: The above process is for work in a public way ONLY. Public Way
Permits are valid only until November 15th. A new Public Way Permit is required
each year if work is not complete. Re-application each November 15th does not
mean an automatic renewal.
I have rcad and understand the above.
Signature
F:/everyone/forms/bldpeffn5
Date Signed
Ip, &flV &D'sertt o-*'nffiK +tfr16(F@
cF*+
^oV
4w AZQ
\^t{tFT.i HoU6€=- ce^hDo f 1q
5Dz4 mnrrn\ e'o"Ag *ttF# znqq rtz oqo lo
Arrto.ogu \^tDaK - ff4orrnr<, r ffioorq +Lstr
K!-tL.ttrr-.\
A*W(€ c'ffOrolme o- counher4€
ftlo fntcAornhrr,'F ovbA a+"[e'a
Ae/v*rg ureapr.n!6-- =.r.ei*6 4lb
€rurD [Ac+att tc( cgrur(W.
\CF M t\pof.LP-frCIrD.
6ft\w5 e) A=I,r*<s ff6T\f'(&
h€lAc€ c+Orctrffi *- courttaA.'S i €i+m€ uocfiitanb.
AEY v+<E 6{rov\H 6+1c.\ 4- \rSL\F6 , DosA .
AdtAtE u6dfi\ntz- eueiltrre v *co cac(6
A<rcleULA\6: W\TnV 6'sne:A Affi€ vlgst(tit-N31
gerhr-fi+r- rr.t'rE:Y,ro$t
V^Jf nloor"Va- A€ptfIF 4tr- I * Yr(n D\if
pro€ I n-pt*<ra F\)-il/n;% rt*Aou6uouf unCtT
I6ga+nA e6$cnrnl6- -r ?+\vbJAr\-r-
A€-(u€'<,€ raesf\s , w ls+na ,
FU< -Tl^.n6TFO flActnre-znn+u &t{716 {- ffi\46
F4flrrnrnle" - Ea<TFnlO LoerFuoo4
AE'lPt ME AfcFT{ A.fttta&A ourt W <snhrpoeA .
Building Permit #:
97 O - 47 I - 2149 (Inspections)
TVWNOPYAIL
75 S. Frontage Rd.Vail, ColoraEo 81657
Contact Assessrc Ofrice at 97O-328-864O or visit www.for Parcel #
Parcet# Zgqq 162 0q0 lO
Job Nam'e:hSFr{ .tfor-69 conlU o +to tWrffir{ 6e6s p6rda-- ur&ru
Legal Description Lot:1 Block: l Filing:Subdivision: *38
owners Nut"' BA\J Frru{.n Addressi@ Phone: q?o +7q .qbb1
Architect/Designer: {\fft Address: 5O7A ft\ft rc{ @lPhone: #- 1
g
Engineer: fr.(*Address:Phone:
iption of work:
g,- t-ftfllDDu.[6'.Asnnoosr- 6PK++6 + u.
Workclass: New( ) Addition( ) Remodel(/ Repair(4 Oeno( ) Other( )
Work Type: Interior ( /) Exterior ( / Borh QJ Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) ttlo 0d
Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Multrfamily (4 Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: lb No. of Accommodation Units in this buildino:7Jr 7
No/Type of Fireplaces Existins: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Loqs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burninq (4 lG
Nofl-ype of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliancas ($) Gas Loqs (+) Wood/Pellet (.&i Wood Burnins (NOT ALLOWED)
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No ( /)Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No (l
COMPLETE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (Labor & Materials)
BUTLDTNG: $ /0, 500 ELECTRTCAL: $ 600. OO !OTHER: $
^PLUMBTNG: $ 1_ Oa o -MECHANICAL: $rorAl: s .1fu4s61i3 zoo-
REFUND CLEANUP DEPOSIT TO:
coNrRAcroR rNFoRMArroN ca,t + en op6.av1
General Contractor:
fn6rf\K t4ruffifc Town of tfai\Reg, ryo.:hb+h /Contact and Phone #'s:
Q1o.*1b.bffio
Contractor Sianature:
********-r******************^r**********r.FOR OFFICE USE ONLY**************rr*****
F:/everyone/f orms/btdgperm
T'FF\o\D1o
\ uvvvc u'-
o lrr'qAr+rfr\,ffi
CE-'v+
^oV
qdo AZq\a}4Fnl HoUS€- ce^hDo d= to
5oZ4 rnAr\nl e'eAs *tr€# znqI t6z oqo to
Aenroper- htD6K - $$r"rrr,te , r Gofuoa(\+ucer
5rw-ttent
Aa?vA:a€ c'ffotole:tb .l.- cou+refl€
firto fntcAornhrt6 ovbA ^ArV€A=(wr-s ur€4s1,{6- pt>ryreA€ 4Jb
erorD [z) c+ot6 tn( c.stur (W.
\cr M ttoo6{"/P-fr?D
6ffs'rc (a A=:.p**<s r><errrr&
4r€!\-+(€ c+6rtk +- counttaA.6; €r+rn€ uoc,nrrronb.
Aept X<s 6uo\^H Oflretn\ +- r,r$L\ffi , DosA .
A#.uA(E u€4tlrntZ- rr.rrrMffi + rfu c^of6
Atrrcl6ULA\6: wrtr{k e'e-rre*\ (Affi€ vt6sg,a-ffif
6enhaft+:- r.l-teKreA
V"hdrpor.ta- A€Pt*:(€ 4{J,- A qr vrfi D\f
A,ePufttg p\y{66n A-€L.. t\annrglA
Aro€ In=pta<g F\)rril/AE -n+Aour6r*ouf uncrT
I e6fim r"t6- -v- efrVnltr.'r-
^€.P\.#<E
DerAS , wls+tna,
F\r -fl^.n6Tto fifrcttr-<z-ruft= 6r$rn€ qr 6r"prrA6
FA0t/nrr{C' - Fa.TFdO uo€f Ft^oo^
A€ft ME AfftFn( Afiq6!6 o\tT6r6ffionhr-coe4.
i j i i"t-t-i i i i I i i i i I i i-f - -l-,
HALSTEAD & ASSOCIATES
963 Lionsridge Loop Suite 514
Vaif , Cof orado El6S7 US3(nq 476_f/J5O
: -i I
FEj
;ai,l
)@1\lirl
)01tq
vQi
?@i
,Ri'ru]u-i
'. s- INl
+1o-l
s-ix,.-l>ai\) .-l\-lRrl
_+"iN1
I\\=
\ si\
l$r"Na\\
i-( ?
\j\\UJr\ a_-3tN
iEt
:$u
">*l.i r)
:*y<-*
hrE
.N\\
\
N
t\.!
\a\
s
$
\.,
Sr'\){{.:.
:l\\)
\,
-{'
\6\ \
3J
a,l
:-s\qr
\!\l_ (
br3\
s\
N\
\-,-.
,\,\I{
sr
,\
.til
NN
S -t/s\t.v r\\J
s{
[E
:\\.S
,N:
NsX$-
J" t ,-lt cvY-'F-i-tl OBoL-o4tr
fnAAla {+ftue;@'e
ce1.,,v+ 4o6 qW Aao
\^D6BT.| LtoUS€- canhpo Cp 19
5oZ4 rnAdn\ €,€ffE- oAtr6# z-oqq ttz oqo l0
:ffi ^'D6K . n)e"s*<gEffi]$Hull,
Fffi.mn$i f,Eiggig3ii
'
;;;;;";';.^vo ;;; .A agieiiiiii
€crD [4 c+r.fa tn(\cE- ,rooF!/P-ro'
\F$EiFEEg€;Iil
ffiJ1)*ffiJffiSi&it{iffi
6FP I.F{E 6{lou.H 6nrct"\ a- lr+utffi , DosA .
Ad\AtE ue*nntg- rurrrMffi v €npo cnx.f'i
Asrcl6\Jr4\6: nrFn,ts e,E.rreA (Affi€ pr6sg,6tffi5
genl-aA+u tn116-9,1+A
fr.hr'[por"te- A€ptffiF 4tr- 8 v f?'r(n D\lf
6,FP uft(E tt\V-iq€#, #r-. rt*rreA
=Frco I n=pWca F\).5r/lr6 118,ou&+ouf unc;tf,laee*n e,6ffmrr.l&.r,eAvt^hur- ;f:&a-eu*<.g DoBAS , wls+tna. ;LFt>. -fl^ndTm fi4c.'ttr-azn'+u- 6u4rn6 <r Cn*@
Fl'srnrnla - FfiFrla Lo€r-Ft^oo-( l!o
A^e$r A-r- A^:r -.1 .l-n-, ,kf- n.+'* a2rnLr--rvln-L-
n1 ''u
Irr
\J
No
l
Oq
IL
E8
E--FElJ-o
o
Tlrcse ale- both in the apprwed permit beslot, orz I uranbd to get them out beforc | take Mon & Tues otr, hnAlbon still n€eds to approve'em. | ontercd my Bldg. approval,-but dirj not cfiansp stafi,.rs to "APPROVED'since
th€y sfrll need planning approval. Thev may birth be i$itied as sq)n as Alison aboroves them.
2(X is our fiietd Mark at ltte Wrcn tf10. I dH not douUe fe€ him for the entire projbc{, since not all vvas started
wi0toqt-q€_n€fit of permit I charged a fast bad< plan r€vieni, fe€ (100% instead-of it5%) u,'hidt will cost him an
exba $286 or so. I told him this, and he said he'thought it was a'reasonaUe thing to db.
lO oto
Page I of I
07t3012001fi le://C:\Windows\TEMP\GW)00ml.IITM
o
DEVELOPMENT
o
COMML}NITYTOI^/NOFVAIL DEPARTMENTOF
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81557
970479-2738
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON TOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICALPERMT Permit #: E01-0150
|ob Address: 5024 MAIN GORE DR SOUTH VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 5024 MAIN GORE DR UNIT # 10 Applied . . : 08/07/2007
Parcel No...: 209918209010 Issued . . : 08/06/200'1,
ProiectNo, QfR. OyO7tty Expires..: 02/02/2002
CoNTRjACTOR STONE CREEK ELECTRTC OS/OL/2OOL Phone: 970-926-200l
P O BOX 1920
EDWARDS, CO
8L632
License: 108 -E
APPIJICAIIT STONE CREEK EL,ECTRIC 08/0L/20O]- Phone: 97O-926-200L
P O BOX 1920
EDWARDS, CO
41632
L,icense: 108-E
ov\rNER BRUGIONI , Jrr-,r, VACEK Oe/Ot/2|OL Phone:
5825 S GII,PIN CT
GREEN VfLLAGE CO
I0121
License:
Desciption: WIRE INTERIORLIGHTING/SVVITCHES/OUTLETS FOR REMODEL
Valuation: $800.00
FEE SUMMARY
Total Calculated Fecs--> S53 . 00Elecuical-> 550.00
DRB Fee-->
lnvestigation->
will ca[->
s0. o0
$0. o0
s3. o0
Additional Fees->$0.00
Total Permit Fee-> $s3 . oo
Payments-> $53 .00
BALANCE DUE___>$0. 00TOTALFEES-> S53 - OO
Approvals:I€e'm: 05000 ELECTRICA! DEPARTMEN'I
o8/ol/2ooL DE Action: APPR
Item: 05500 FIRE DEPARTMETIT
CONDITIONSOF APPROVAL
Cond: 12i:-":":iffi ::*:1":13::*:5:j::.:::"*-"-:::H:
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this applicatioo filled out in ftrll the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zonin5
and zubdivision
thereto.
I
and other
REQITESISFORINSPBCflON SHALLBEMADETWENTY-FOLTR HOURSIN ADVANCE BYTELEPHONE AT479-2138 OR ATOUROffiCEFROM E:00 AM -5
SIGNATIJRE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIil4SELF AND OIVhIET
o
codes,desigfr Uniforur
o
reviewapproved,
o
Building ordinarrces of the Town applicable
o
rlrlla'la't+flaa+ft+t*+t*fa***a'iaialt*trrtfatfa*aa++a++f*jt{rata'}a**t*aa*aaa**+t*+**t*****t'}**,}f
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement*f'}tafa+a+a++ff+l**l:l*i+a*a+***llaralrrfll*fl*aa**faat'taaaaa*tarlaa+a*+++++f*+*+**+++aa*rarrr
Statenent, Number: R000001183 Anount: $S3.00 OB/06/2O0L02242 pM
Palment Method: Cash Init: LrC
Notatlon: cagh by Mark llalstead
Permit No: 801-0160 Type: ELEerRICAIJ PER!,IIT
Parcel No: 209918209010
Site Addrese: 5024 MAfN GORE DR SOttTH
Location: 5024 MAIN GIORE DR ttNIT
Thia Payment:9s3 . oo
Descri pti on
Balance: $0. OO***t'lt***tt*r*t****rlrrlt**trrtt******it*+l+*+++*l*+itf++fiitfa+tftt+tl+f****+l***tltrt*****{ra
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code
\'AIL
#10
TotsaI Fees:
Total AIrIJ Pmta :
$s3.00
$s3.00
Current ftnts
EP 0010000311i400
t.lc 00100003112800
TEMPORARY PO.IER PEMITS
I.IILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
50.00
3.00
w-31-.Mt @1,zEFFI r1}S3g
O
ATf|JS.ITIOTIUI8.|' IIOTBE AGEEF]ED IF IMOilPTETE Oi ln
PtltGa+:
Brildng Fcnnn#!
E:ctidFcntitf:
4?924s2 P.6
VMa,ltril
?!S.fmtrgsf,d.rrfr ctufi
'4St '
lriar*zr{' C!|lDsdc|E)
*Jilm,$t**
!! [..*rrrr. !26-2ol
,r/
'o/r-;
€Girnrre sQ. fcETF{rR trErBrtrr-osrd Y urrTtrrc ffi l|l oI}lE|[S (rt|bf I rllErbrF)
N{ITT OF SA FT DI.SIREilR€:
ffi
rob ilenp: hKFf{ +h*ng:CmtpoL# ro
rrOo-.r*-lf.* f lu.* 3 Inrrq: nik lg'r'i"ion: €toAgGAFt;f(
fn$s: I mrE$:Pftqc:
:IXEbtt tLsiFiTr of rqt , ,trtrAs r ohre-KtoA r-r ettnr{& /g'nrrr?xa /r arn=S+ ef-*rytg€L-
w"*IrDc. ItrFbr06 s(Eris( ) B.0t( )
t-rr.crc.. *det5lttt I oupu<t I rut y9{ con|Ha( ) R!flr|i( ) ooEr( }
!!:! !t! lrt
lb. oa E i*hl Ducilt-lttg t ifs h ttk_ hiding: I 6
rcrhicrsnrittuahdtb: Yes( ) No(X1 -
-
.JUL 3 r Z00l
TOV-COM.DEV.
TOTH- P.93
OoO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMT]NITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PLUMBINGPERMIT
5024 MAIN GORE DR SOUTH VAIL
2099182090r0
(x5or 'o Lt1\.-
OWNER BRUGIONI , iIILL VACEK
5825 S GIIJPTN CT
GREBT VILI,AGE CO
80121
Lricense:
CONTRACTOR .fERRY SIBI-,EY PLIJMBING
P O BOX 340
MINTURN CO
81645
. I-,icense: 134-P
APPLICAITT .]ERRY SIBI-,EY PIJ'MBING
P O BOX 340
MINTURN CO
81545
License:134-P
TO]VN OF.VAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL. CO 81557
970479-2t38
Job Address:
Location.....:
Parcel No...:
Project No :
Permit #: P0l-01l0
Stafus...: ISSUED
Applied. . : 09/2812001
Issued. . : lO/O2l20Ol
Expires. .: 03/31/2002
09/28/200t Phone:
09/28/20OL Phone:97 0-827 -5736
09/28/200t Phone: 97O-821-5136
Desciption: REMODEL AND REATTATCH PLUMBING IN 2 BATHS AND KITCHEN AREA
Valuation: $2.000.00
Fireolace Information: ReEtricted: ??# ofGas Appliances: ??# of Gas Lop: ?? # of Wood Pallet: ??
FEE SUMMARY
Plumbing->
Plan Chcck-->
Investigation->
will call_>
R€stuarant Plan Review->
DRB Fee--------->
TOTAL FEES->
Tolal Calculated Fe€s->
Additional lre€s_..._>
Total Pennit Foe->
Paymen$-.->
BAT,A]\ICE DLIE->
s30.00
s7.s0
$0.00
s3.00
s0. 0o
90.00
s40.50
s4o.5o
50.00
$40. s0
940.50
s0,00
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMEMT
09/28/200L DF Action: AP
Item: 05500 FIRE DEPARTMEI{T
Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELD
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPI.,,IAT{CE.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information requird completed an accurate plot pla4 and
state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town
ordinances and according to thc towns zoning and subdivision codes, desigr review approvd
Uniform
\-(
of the Town applicable thereto.
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
INFORMATION
COMPLETE VALUATIOI{ FOR PTUMBING PERMIT (Labor & Materials)
Town of Vail Reg. No.:Contact and Phone #'s:0 6z-7 .a7zb c
PLUMBING: $7-AOO.-
Conta.t Assessors Office at 970-328-864O or visit for Patel t
Parcel # (Required if no bldg. permit # is provided above)
rob Name: 5oZ4 dlAnc{ AAq& .r.ftff Job Address: 5oZ+ 4cflc( M€94'
i^,.rA6N +\0\66 # IO
Lesaf Description ll t-ou ] llanck: l Filins: t-{ €r Subdivision: W,e-
OwnersNam"'(aAuenoC*(l llAddress:Pho'"tq1o +-7to [n4-6r
Engineer: N+ ll Address:Phone;
Detailed description of work:
Ae{ywtr'-o 66pffifif Q u.m4l.rsle- d (AAanu { kr7}++€rl AA€re
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Alteration( ) Repair( ) OtherO<J(EirryfOi:E:f-
Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex ( ) Multi-family (,rf Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: lG No. of Accommodation Units in this building:ttft
Is this a conversion from a wood burning fireplace to an EPA Phase II device? Yes ( ) No X
****** ***** ******* *** ************* ** * ** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY"**************** *** ******** **** *****
O(*rer Fes:DaERee ved:
DRB Fees:Accsted v:
Planner Siqn-off:
F/er/eryoneforms/pl mbperm
W'o
try*:F,f
:-ffiffi#*J.*$,Tovm ofVail Survey
Community Dorelopment Departnent Russell Fomst Director,
(970117s.213e
Check all thd applies-
1. Which Departnen(s) did you conbc{?
Building _ Environmental _ Housing_ Admin
Planning DRB PEC
2. Was your initial contact with our sbfi immedide_ slow
no one available_?
3. lf you were required to wait, how long was it before you were
helped?_
4.Was your.project reviewed on a timely basis? Yes / No
lf no, why noi?
5. Was fiis yourfirstlime b fle a DRB app_ PEC app
Bldg Permit_ IIUA
Please rate fie performance of &e sEfiperson who assisbd you:
54321Name:
(knorrrledge; responsiveness, avallability)
Overallefiectiveness of he Front Service Counter. 5 4 3 2 {
Whatis he bestlime of day for you b use $e FrontService
Countef
9. Any commenb you have which r,rmuld allow us to better serve you
nexttime?
Thank you fortaking the lime to complete this survey.
commited b improving our service.
0r
-lt.
8.
We are
"cr,:{6:SlCf
,,')'i qlll
Bjillrl_:rja::t I -:l}':f ri: ' r!:,:
,i:",.. .:,. t:'-.L'i'J. F. ;:'::
n1-:?!;,'tsj', : l'Ai:1S'l:: -' :1 I : r;l':: :
i.-".q
"
*-'.ff. $#;i: l
t;lfi
ii,;13 :'JcleiiS
..'... . :
{ t:e :ile9 j:il;1i iiii;
1{AIIrli r rr,r.irr :i t'E ;-':" i l-".' I t
'l i;F $Y€n frl!
FiJu'r':
..t.'.1 .'
{zt- f<rr
I a,ir
r:t r: '1tii::.'l 4 .'; -'l)'l'
1il,i:
.'J'- 't: i- t: . tl
'-r it'; : :..:_i '. - _
":.+f q r:r'-;i: ; .:'. i '',ii,.:.';; :r i,lr.-;,,..
F:?r!, ljj s,.I , .-, .,:'.r :...r'. .t,,ri :.1!i.:"''
. ... - ... *ry.- | I i..
I ,:-i:i :i:r.
li,:r I r ' .il lii.':-....:;,',jjs.r-. 5i"r *,.:',.'' i,'':at
3, i! :': . i' :+:.i :?.:i:. i;-l
::-:. ^:_ ,' - rt ir;: : l . '
a,_:r ',,.: :ir i'ili" 'F-i
/.1Y/ ,* &dtt' K"\ l/tt,k
/.
pd'
t,//
Co-4 t uh n',
d,//t 4/4-/<A
.) U 4',/ru/' '-
/ --L 15 /--r
/fr ,r"/ Anrn^ '(-'/L2<^-
/0,.J u,r)
4r-7 s
ltatrr
RF,PT]-di Fr.r.r-' I.:: 1 6hij
lnwn
ili roulh frrontage rcad
vall, colorado 81657
(30(r) 4792138
(3sr) 47$213s
otffce ot communlty development
February 21, 1991
Dtr. Brandon Baumgarten
5024 llain core DiiveVail, colorado 8L657
Re: BusLness License Application for Business Located at
5024 Main Gore Drive
Dear Brandon:
We understand that you park both a vehicle for the Alpine Sedanplus a van used for airport transport at the above location at theWren llouse. The Town cannot approve your home occupationapplication because conmercial vehicles are not permitted to beparked on the site of a home occupation.
You may choose to keep one of the vehicles on the site, but youmust come ln and modify your application to speeify that tnevehicle you have is your personal vehi.cle, in addition to beingyour business vehicle for the hone occupation.
If you have any questions regarding this, please call ne at 479-
2L38.
Sineerely,
l,tr, u ll.- '-'q
ffi#:!'rPlanning Technician
BR/ab
/r' l- /,
o
Date
o
6/L
.8,,
Project Applicationt &. Creek Scl
n*tB- U,tA 5Proiect Nam€:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Addre$ and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Com ments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by: .
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
summary: ,4( ','. t< T C *).>.f 6 C F': v:nty:n
!
\
\-^- !r.9.tr|it|.ilrE
-
lom
lnwn
Bruce Rich
Byron Brown Real Estate
Box 547
Vail Co 81658
l,lr. Rich'
I have enclosed
for your use.
contact ne.
Sinc erely,
PETER JAMAR
Town Planner
PJ:br
Encl .
75 soulh honteoe roaal ' varl. colotado 61657
3o3/476'70d) erl 236
Peler Jamar
P|lnner
Depaflmeol ol Community Developmenl
department of community development
April 13' 1981
Subdivis
6 units Per
20% site
box l(X)
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 47Gs613
is zoned residential cluster rfiiEf,-allows a density
provided the requirenents-of-the zone 1l:ll'i:t 1::i"*h"r, 60% of the site landscaped, setbacks, etc'
acre
coverage
a copy of the Residential Cluster zone district
If I ian be of any additional help, please feel
requirenents
free to
rl
6\
x
:L.
I
ll
q\.\('\\\l
(bpPNp
\):S$),,trK$ { o $o{o$
\
\'c.
-a)s
OJ
\$
=a{l
l
I
lf
i
\
{
).1
\
I
\Is's
$
\
i
I
l
Irl
oo
October 23, L978
REVIEW BOARD:
everyof Vail
site visit
building
staked.
to appear before the Designtheir' scheduled meeting andfor a postponement w111 be
republished.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
REGABDING ALL SI'BIdISSIONS TO THE DESIGN
1.) The Design Review Board meets
Thursdar at 3 P.M- in the Town
Municipal Buil-ding-
5. ) The revlewinvolve two
so Plan on
approval .
2.) A11 persons wanting to appear before' tIe besign Review Board must contact
the Department of Community Development
no later than L2 Noon on the Tuesday
of the week Prlor to the meeting so
that all Agenda items can be published
in the Vail Trail.
3.) A11 materials to be reviewed by the DRB- iilust be received by the Departnent of
e-ouuaunity Development no later than 5:00 P'M'
itt" -rtlgg1lg{glg the DnE-ffific Hearing'
4.) A11 new buildings will require a
by efifier Dn-g' o?-the staff . Your
locations and drivewaYs should be
process for NEW BUILDINGS will
separate meetings of the DRB'
at least 2 vreeks for their
6.) People who fail
Review Board at
have not asked
reEuireA to be
,0/t F/zr
weqrmltr&r,iw4fi{E11'_{FrFEwoo oo
Project Application
&/t /'o',LProiect Name:
Proiect D€scription:
Owner Address and Phone:
F-
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zonei
Zoning Approved:
Design Revlew Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
^lMo 5.haq-r
Summary:
Zoning Administrator
Date:Dale:
Project Appllca
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
', Architect Address and Phone:
L- satn
Legal Description: Lot
't
, Block Filing-)/ ' l-L t- ,/,+. t +E 6'r,h
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
: (u-?1t
Design Review Board
DISAPPROVALAPPROVAL
Summary:
Zoning Administrator Chief Building Oflicial