HomeMy WebLinkAboutCASOLAR VAIL LOT 13 PHASE 2 GENERAL LEGALto
OWNER THOMAS PRINGLE 1980 DISCRTR04/01/2002 Phone:
MICHAEL
43 HARVARD RD
FAIR HAVEN NJ OZl04
License:
APPUCANT Don Eggers
Eggers Architecture, Inc.
POB 6041
Avon, CO 81520
License:
o4l0Il2002 Phone: 926-8126
lo
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail. Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
DRB Numben
Addition of99 sq, ft. each side ofduplex; new metal seam roof; new exterior stucco & paint.
TOI1il\I
Project Name: Pringle residence
Project Description:
Participants:
ProjectAddress: 1146 SANDSTONE DRVAIL
Legal Description: Lot: A-7 Block: 13 Subdivision:
Parcel Number: 210301414014
Comments:
Location: C.asolar II both sides of duplex
CASOLAR VAIL
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
Charlie Acevedo
Bill Pierce
5-0
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approvah O5/ 75/2002
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s),
Cond:0
(Pt AN); DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $O.OO
\OO ILl'
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 Sorrth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci,vail,co.us
Project Name: Wood residence
Project Descriptionr
Participants:
OWNER WOOD, GLEN E,
PO BOX 2895
EDWARDS CO
81632
License:
APPUCANT Don Eggers
Eggers Architecture, Inc.
POB 6041
Avon, CO 81620
License:
ProjectAddress: 1146 SANDSIONE DR VAIL
Legal Description: Lot: A-7 Block 13 Subdivisionl
Parcel Number: 2L03074740L5
Comments:
DRB Number: DR8020077
Addition of 99 sq. ft. each side of duplex; new metal seam roof; new exterior stucco & paint.
04/01/2002 Phone:
O4l 0U2002 Phone; 926-8126
Location: Casolar II both sides of duplex
CASOLAR VAIL
BOARD/STAFF ACTTON
Motion Byl
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
Charlie Acevedo
Bill Pierce
5-0
west and south sides of the building.
Planner: Bill Gibson
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approvah A5{L5/2A07
DRB Fee Paid: $3OO.O0
@nd:8
(P|-AN): No dranges to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a pennit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to @nstruction activities.
Cond: CON0005290
That additional landscaping of 15 evergreens and 25 aspens be placed at the east
oe oo
1146 Sandstone Drive
Vail. Colorado
29GA. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
AMEzuCAN BUILDING COMPONENTS
MOSS COLOR
PORTERPAINTS
7193-3 PLOVERGRAY
PORTERPAINTS
7185-2 CATHEDRAL GRAY
ROOF:
FASCIA:
STUCCO:
BODY:
ACCENT:PORTERPAINTS
7186-2 GRAY STONE
BASE:7187.3 AUTUMN BARK
WINDOWS: EXIST. ALUM CLAD
BRONZE
L
oo oo
T0l44V
Application for Design Review
DeDatment of Community Development
ZS Soutn Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 97Q'479'2452
web: www.ci'vail.co'us
General Information:fiiffii#iffiffiTli;' review must receiyg 1qor9y!!ti?'.i:.':b::T33"1^t"11':n"^1,il15.'PiJ'ffii?l; JliL;il'tiJ?ltr"""Sfli[:'"'Aiil#:il: i'oi-tinI;ilJ#;;;;J;'ithat is requested' An apprication ror Desisn Review
n^.,^r^hm6nt nFnarfmFnt- The:"".lJi;:"":::il:T[ii'5i'l&ru il:#:''#;; iffii-i tr,l".S:ll::Y ?fl"i"inil:3.1P"?Hillin,I'.1cannot be accepteo untll dll re{-lurrcu rrrrur rrro.'rvrr ' -nvironmental Commission.
;;;j;e ;;t;6 need to be rlviewed bv the r.own _council,:i:/:j-:|",0]1T'T#,0,;;"" commences withrneJ:1..,f"T:1,ffij}Tff:,H#;;'i#:.;J#;g;;iii='Lued and dnstrucrioncolences witnin
one year of the aPProval'qq I !. i, ([-yu.t I ?<L'
Description of the Request:
Locationof theProposal: Lot: l3 Bbck:
ael*yl vwe; \rqr'-- v'f 1., '1q- 2 i . )e*l€tn6 ttr{'lqu-r ;ot 'j^-1)
A Subdivisiont Ctl*ottt* fr
physicaf Address: IFk +arJQAnrJE fulE
Zoning: A'-tf>o
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of APPIicant:
Parce|No.:W(ContactEag|eCo'Assessorat970-328-8640forparcelno')
E-mail Address:
MaitinsAddress: h bv ha+t NtJ, At SIloZ'o
=Phone: of:Lrt,gl?.b
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area'
No Fee
$65Q For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild'
lffif ior in aoaiton wnere squarefo-ota99..1s aOfeojg anv residential or
\---'l commercial uuiroing (inilildes 250 aidltions & interior conversions)'
$250 ioi -no, changes to buildings and site improvem-ents' such as'
rerooflng, painllng, window additions' landscaping' fences ano
retaining walls' etc'
$20 ;;;*;;t changes to buildings and site improvem-ents' such as'
reroofing. painling, windoi additions' landscaping' fences and
retaining walls' etc.
$20 r"i t""Liont io plans already approved by Planning staff or the
Design Review Board'
No Fee
Type of Review and Feel
D Signs
! ConcePtual Review
0 New Construction
f naaition
n Minor Alteration
(multi-familY/commercial)
'Q Minor Alteration
(single-familY/duPlex)
! Changes to APProved Plans
! Separation Request
q0t/.L]L
t$,0{\
oo oo
EXI$TING FRCNT [LEVEVATION
oo oo
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATION
oo oo
EXISTING PARTIAL REAR ELEVATION
oe ol
EXISTING PARTIAL REAR ELEVATION
It46 Sandstone Drive
Vail, Colorado
29GA. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
AMERICAN BUILDING COMPONENTS
MOSS COLOR
PORTERPAINTS
7193-3 PLOVER GRAY
PORTER PAINTS
7185-2 CATHEDRAL GRAY
oo
ROOF:
FASCIA:
STUCCO:
BODY:
WINDOWS: E)flST. ALUM CLAD
BRONZE
oo
ACCENT:PORTERPAINTS
7186.2 GRAY STONE
BASE:7187-3 AUTUMN BARK
_m
D('IIOre|A
c
- O?,bOlO lll lllt..EtloFr
+*r"-
--1rI@arl
!.! lnE riro
ni|lElm
uonrorao
tat It tl toot L
J&-34.-!Cg:-:t-
b-lfrc.ao\rlD(ftlt! tEta
t-rtiE@vl-oirr.msolEalltD
J43ArpO9ro D{rtoii? rlra
et
tlrrl-E
tmroLpIt tY !90! tt
@l,ltoti rro9l .|l
Ar! tnFg Llg
tttEl
nr ttt- lal
anb€ \alr ra
-f*
o
*-w--
oo oo
l*++*++*tl't|+t*.*t**...|*t.'i*++*t+||+.++*.|{'..|.*lt*+.+.|+.|.|**t*{t+||......*t*+|t..|1....+.
TOWNOF VAIL, coLoRADO tatqnent
+ | + + +*+* + + tf + + * I + **f + + rr* {lr*** * * +,tl +t +*+* ++ | tt tt * +a+ +f+ aa**a ll' ta'l**++ f aal+itaa't ''ff f* ..'f rtt
statetnenc Nuniber: Ro0ooo2o93 ArnounE: $300'00 04/ot/2oo2o4:38 PM
Payment Mettrod: Check rnLt': rrAR
Notatlon: 2343 Gten wood
Permit No: DRB020o7? TyPe I DRB - Addition of GRFA
Parcel No: 210301414015
SLte AddreaB: 1146 SAIID8TONE DR VAIL
IJocation: Caaolar II both gldes of duplex
Total Feea :
ToEAI AIJ, PMtA:
Balance!
$300.00
$300.00
9o. ooThiE Palment:$300.00
ar r a*** tr fl at r+++ ++ r a frr*f ta I r,t f*t*+ r+*+**+*a9 rr* rr r++ ttt* r**aaa t+t3*t+ fa*tt'} rtt I l 'ftll *t"* |
ACCOTJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descri pti on Curr"ent Pmts
DR 00100003112200 DESIGN REVIEt,| FEES 300 .00
{clE/||,}rc!^CrfrD.lllq Rl&ra
rrtm@!l-ioiDO?.t.i|EiE|lE
lotD&t,gaol'|' f{fio ijt /I^
E@ !ar9Er riFan {t
l.lvE g-, l?.a' V.
Er sgtF l9ir
"ffif
ttEa@cm
N
tat rt !Y
a.l iU@O aAo
tDE4-llt
j.ts'J,4gl4-
t- a!!co lror|?Iltrlpara
f.,{.-''#
EIST. ELEVATION
PROPOSED ELEVATION
CAMPISI RESTDENCE REMODEJ,
1145 W. SANDSTONE DR,
!0/!0/94
PROPOSA], :
NEW I,IINDOI,I, TRrM, SIDING TO }IATCH
INSTAIL NEW 8' WIDE GARJ1GE DOOR TO
EX I STING .
MATCH EXISTING.
:t:T,-uf'*,,,-
iligntviewAction FCh O
TOWN OF VAIL
,"" loll,U I4r:Category Number
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecvcontact, Address and Phone:
Comments:
L6galDescriptiont^ 11) Bbck subdivision
rl
Projec{ Street Address: | |
Zone District
Board / Staff Actlon
Motion by:Vote:
Seconded by:
U Apploval
t/""pp-u^t
y' Staffnpprovat
Conditions:
Town Planner
Date:
o
As technology has progressed, a new type of hot tub and spa has been developed. This new
type is esseniially a sell-contained unit with all plumbing, etc., contiaineci within ihe structure of
the unit. The only necessary component for his type of unit is an electrical ouget. For the
Town's purposes, these units will be considered.moveable/portable hot tubs and spas.
The following information must be subrnitted, where applicable, with all requesb for
portable/moveable hot tubs or soas:
survey or site plan - The building location, all property tines and the proposed hot tub
unit should be shown.
cut sheeuphotograph of unit - All units must be u.L. listed and must meet the UBC.
condo Association - lf a unit is to be located on a general common element (G.c,E.)
0r limited common element (L.C.E.), condominium association written approval must be
obtained.
Hazards - A hazard letter will not be required unless some other structure, as defined
in section 18.04.310 of the Town of Vait Municipat code, is also being added. specific
requirements for structures in hazard areas are in Section 1g.69 of the Town of vail
zoning code. flaRs indicating hazard areas are available in the Community
Development Department office.
o R.etl6ca-=-
TO:
FFOM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
General Public
Community Development Department
February 19, 1992
Movable/Portable Hot Tubs and Spas
iR-r,it u',ri
A hot tub may be added to an existing, conforming (legal) deck. Decks may encroach into
setbacks, including front, rear, side and creel( either 1i2 the setback distance or 10 feet if
within 5 feet of grade, or 112 the s-etback distance or 5 feet if more than S feet trom grade.
Please refer to Section 18.50.050, 18.58.060 and 18.58.300 of the Town of Vaitzoning code
for the specific regulations. Requests for hot tub/spa encroachments into sehacks further
than allowed for decks may be approved by the Design Review Board. Other secticns of the
code, which are not cited in this memo, may also be applicable to some installations.
All completed applications for movable/portable hot tubs will be reviewed by staff. No
approval can be given without all the necessary inlormation as listed above.
This review program is not applicable to permanentibuilt-in hot tub/spa uniF.
The Town will not regulate 'temporary' hot tubs which are sited for less than a 48-hour period.
1,'ltPft@
/pular'1@
1uilAqO
,/" &
tr.
' ;.;F :i ,3: i,r:sl ltF: tit,|,-U;rF':l;=,,e REtlilcu;: 'U1"".1 sterti': "
DAS lpFr,rctlrcl| - {9ml or lBrlr, eoIloRADO
:.O.TE APPLICATIO}I RECEIED ;DAIE 0Ir DRB I'iEE|ING:
*taiaiitt**
?Htr$ AtlL,rCltIOr nILL {OtE BE ACeEFilGS$urrr r&& RsgulBED rlttonr{rrrog rs sgttsggrp***trtrfr!
FrcoJEc 4,, Bmostr{AFloN I
A. DESCRIPTION:
A, 'fYSE CIF F,.S:VIEIJ:
lles {:r1rJ:Etruction (S100 . 00}
iddi:ion (t50.00i
ADDRESs:
LEGAT DESCPJPIIONT trot _ Blnck
')( Po47a#{+ *@ut\gt-.{
-'_!l*i"e-rF-++++r++i.en (
gonc€scu3l Rcvl,sH
rtPtt
J4U.IJJJ
(90)
tr-
}.
Subrltvlslo$ f'3:g^L-$ip -r-r.
-
If, propsrty ls dRsertbad by e rir++"-s and boun{:s legalclgsosiFtl,+n, plqa:r,e provlCe qn E sepalate sheer. aii.Jlttsuch ti] t"trls *1:rp!lcuc1.on.
i0NIt'lG r
L,OT BREA: If r'6q'.rj.as4,g-,.gmped survey ghsrri4g
lir,',!{E Of APPLJCA}IT:
Ma i l.L ng AdCre$ $ :
$us: Flovlde a c,Jrrellt.appl icaar
Iqt Erea.
?rt
AFFI" CA}{T' i frF.PBE.SENtAIilE:l.t*(ir'4,J,0( C.d'r,l$to,4F Fod{"
- dn r1{,q,-.,,{;+. **H?l-_
{ saqii-:.J.T.MS OF
Mai_1}og ltddre€E:
Sr/"d #.$4 r.HT.ME OF OT{IJEF.S :
Phons
"=-.:"stct*rERSts):
Ma!.I:ng .Addt'ees:
Cttrdomtniurn Appr'o,ral if gj.rpl.icabte.
DFts FEE: DiB fees, as sh,lwn abave n elE to be irtr:!(l al.thd tia$ of gubnircal, of, l)RH .3pp1ic3t j.o:l , Lat:r, sfirnepplying fc,c a boliClng &,*:;rrrii, pls*s{i itisrillfy ckceccurats virlUatiort Cf tjle proposal. the Town qi VaiIwill adjust: the feri ac({rfJi rlg Lo tl:e t r*hL* b*lcu, t.osnours eJtc €6sr*c'; tec 1.3 Frt4,rTE PAID: 3
:
FF-F
$ 20.00
s 50.00
3!00 - 00
gxurJ.00
$100.00
$500,00
,-.]ons IEAn. I$aEa PxxeL
l$suED e,$D colf$rRoctrcd rs
P'pE $ggsDqlli
vt\tuATtrolls 0 - S 10,000st0,00r-$ b0,000s50,001 -5150,000$r50,0€l - $ 500,0s0
s500,001 - $1,000,000$ over $I.0001 000
Drs:o$ SIvItff 80A,8D aspnovAt *;tprREg
lrFFove& g$IlEsg & tgtl/DxNc psrufit rs
sttnEED.
IPPI.rcArtoN - Tona otr varr.,
DATE APPI,ICATTON RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
O ".tu slttsL
COI.oRADO
,ttlt ,i rl!';
DRB
******r***
IEIS EPPLICATIOX $ILL HOtr BE ICCEPEED
nlrTIL AI.L REQUIRED tlfFoRiltrllorf rS SI'Bl{rlrED**********
I.
A. DESCRIPTION:
TYPE OF REVIEW:
New construction (9200.00)
foe:tAtL tbut\4'& 6Pt
Mi-r!€*LE€ra*i'en ($20. 00)x
D.
Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
ADDRESS: ll'lb NFsf g/kp,0E,ro^/4- n4tUL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot
-
Block
Subdivision
If property is described by a neeLs and bounds }egal
description, please provide on a separate sheet and
attach to this application.
E.
F.
H.
NAME OF APPLICANT:
ZONING:
Mailing Address:
N€t"n 'ock
NAME OF APPLICA}IT, S
M*{rau,q eb',AfreT @L
REPRESEI-{TATIVE: /t4lt4a c$ A€-LAS
LOT AREA: If required,
stamped survey showing
must provide a currentapplicantlot area.
lsa
Mailing Address: f/-
gN ilryT r.\>
J.
K.
NAME OF OWNERS:
Phone
r. l{A<4L( C-a.*tPt\ r'
*SIGNATURE (S) :Mailing Address:Phone 2t/ b?Y -
'Yeo
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at
t.he time of submittal of DRB aPplication. Later, when
applying for a buiLding permit, please identify tbe
accurate valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vaif
will adjust the fee according to the Lable below, to
ensure the correct fee is paid.
8BE PIID: S
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATTON$ o - $ 1o,ooo$ 10,001 - I 50,000
$50,001 -$ 15o,0oo
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500r 001 - $1,000,000$ Over $1r 000,000
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$L00.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00 .00
* DESIGN RSVIET' BOARD AFPBO\TAI.. E:FIRES OTSA YEAR AFTER TINEIJ
APPRO\IAL UNUESS A BUILDING PEnMTE fS TSSUED AND CONSTRUCTTON fS
SIARTED.
**NO APPLICATION TILT. BE PROCESSED WITEOUT OWNER'S SIGNATURE
o lBTr---
'f,tc'Do0T 1g 1993
SHEET 2 OF 2
IHPNOVNHENT IOCA'IION CER'I'IF'ICATE
T,ECAL DESCFIPTION:
l'hooe portiona of parcer 13 and tbp comnon Area of caaolar vail,rr' a aubdlvieton recorded r.n ths of,fice of the ragl; c"*rtv,--colorarlo clerh end Recorder,- deocribed ae roliowe:* B";l;i"e eta' p.,inr vhence rhg qgr!_noriherly """*"-"i-;;r;' c"di;;- v;ii iibears N 4'25'96" B bg.o6 feet dtetent; thence cn* rrrriowrne-i"*icouraes around thg. r*?:?.lv_lfl{-qf "l ertaring,' duplexi iiT A-a3"3l-1.8" E 40.10 feer; (?) S"F6"nB-aZ- W So.oS-IE"t; (s) N sa-31-18" tf 40.1o feet,i (4i N 56- 2lJ-42- E 30-06 i""t to the point, ofEegtrurlne, County of Eagle, Stetre of CoLorado.
NORTH
$CALF l"= ao'
rlt+ w trenuapl6 p6.
Lro)
--,8.F e. ,' ' 'J-r I.l | 4U E* LUER
tf
/
&.
\ o),
il/
"97'
tii'\
Lor A-6
\t\o^
."""
'",'-[....
rol.ltir
,go
'01
.$lr'l0lzl
1\
4 :\\+\\.ti, \\t. r
\e"\s
,?
.+n,/
SOMtv16N AREA
FqILDIFC 6\,Etrt|lANe
tt?
F"ft'---*1j e l/abQFLFX?Yiffi
.,'9
FATTCEL
IB
/\
( DEe$ FAsGI{FNT E,!.Eb--i- ( erox {12. FAae "or )
CABOLAK VAIL 1r
,-""y1
NoTe; oUTLINE oF r,qPLHx FoLI.owg A LAI{6 IIAFC EL I.FGAL FEacRI,"rI6N
-J
REcRE,ATTqN ARe.a''-'-'
I
I
I
I
wr' ,\t . il"vt^/ '
t'i -.otir{-
October 08, 1993
Mr. Tdn Ferfetti
c,/o lGximum Ccrnfort IOol and Spa
P.O. Box 2666Vail, OO 81658
re: Spa iJlstaLlation aE It46 Sandstone Drive,Canqrisi residence
Dear TCIII,
Ttris letter is to inform you that as Secret-aqz-T:reasurer and Manager of the
Casolar Hdneovwrers' Association, that ]rou are hereby authorized to proceed
with tlre installation of the spa at the Canpisi resd.dence located at
1146 Sandstone Drive according to the specifications you, have sutxnitted.
Sinr.arolr.r
1175 B Casolar Drive
Vail, Cll 81657
Phone 476-0430
PLEASE MAKE CHECK
TOWN OF VA-IL
D EPA RT;\{ ENT 0F COlvl lvlU'{ITY D EVELO P}IENT'
, SALES ACTION FOR}{
75 SOUTH TRONTAGE ROAD
ZCI\'I\-G .d\D ADDRESS htAls0l c€00 4 t5{0
LDIf,rO L\{ B ttl D [."C C OD E
UMFO&\{ PLU},GDIG CODE
0t cslo 424 t5
0t 0000 r24 t5
0l 00i042.1)5 .f UNIFoR\';\lECHlI'lCr.LCODE
or 0000 J?.ils I uxlron rt Flnt coos
N,\TIONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE0t 0000 129 t5
or o0oo{24r5 | on.|rncoDEBooKs
0t 0010.1154s B LUE PR,L\TTS
0l 0001.12112 I >:raox coplEs / s'iuDIEs
0r 00c{42371 i PENAt.TY FEE5/RE.r\SpEClloNS
0l coc0.rt332 ipL,uVRgvlsvRE.cHEcKFr-E IS.(0FER HR.l t
0l 00CO 42321 | OF? IIOURS DTSPECTION FEFJ
0l 0003.{l{r2 CONTJ{.ICTORS LICL\S ES FEES
SlGN APPLICA]ION F;E
0l G0o0il3:0
.01 0000 4 t4l3
0t 000041{r3 ADDITIONAI.SICNACE;!E ISI,O];'ERSO,IT.
01000042.1{0 }TC A RT PFO'ECT DO.VAI]ON
PRE P.AJD DF.SICN Rg\TIE1V BOARD FEE
UILDTNG-CONSTRUCTION PER},IIT COI'IPUTER DI
0000 41010 TAX
01 0000 42371 TNVESTTGATTON FEE (BUTLDTNG) I 'roro,
our,
ETTERIOR, ALTF IiORE TH.,a"'\t ICA
0000a1!l{) r5
clc00 it330 lz
I
RECEIPT - ^e Towr/Qoc+ ,,"%N9 45314
Permit Numbers Polj.qe Recdpt Nunrbers --=.==_--
How PAID cash
-ch
""{---WA *
ia
-|- *tnr-{ {:rF -l_|FI I l-
i'ii;r':11en**uE f,.-h
1 I .::l'a. r:,i
i. .. lt : r. -.i--i l
, t 1 .-.. .: !:i
; ' ' ,, ., ...i1 ii .L - r'-L'
i:i,;i::;lili'i ::.',ii'ii !ji;:"i .i-'F:[; ir[l
l.;rr'..,i .,,. "','i l.;i:'i 'r' l ,r "r:'ri' !lll'11
i r.eiii P-=id Fittrururrt' P:id
':t ..,.:.;i:'; i:..-:.::itiiirr :::,:ri' ilir.l
. .. : i;j. irl:;
-i-HFf F-{t'i r.r*tJ
i,'r.jrj i :.:r:.i!!,.,: i;:'L i:ti'i li:i
o
Y@
o
G
The perfect spa for smaller spaces and
tighter budgets. It's all the spa you could ask
for - with plenty of room for four and lots of
hydrotherapy options. And all this luxury is
available at a price you wouldn't expecl The
Prodigy is also sized to fit through a standard
doorway, so finding the right space is easy.
Finding the time to enjoy it is even easier.
Seatint Capac itla l-lp to4 adults and one child
Dimensrons:5'Il"r6' 0"x 29"H
WaterCapacityi 295ga ons
Jet Configurarion:5lets tcta inc rding I Jetstream
tor feet, ca ves and rower ]ack,4 adJUfable
hyd roth e ra fy lets
Seating T),pe Deep rnu t -leve , bench-tyoe seat -g, carrier-free
EffectiveFillerArea: 90squarefeet tcp-oading
Hydrojet Pump:figh y effc ent IHP
5 voL, 1.5 kw sta n ess steelt requires dec cated 20
amp circurt receptacle included as standard.
Thermosb! S€nsitivity: Plus o- r n.s l dcgree F
Electrical Safety: Completelyu L listed
Weight:485 bs. ory,2 945 lbs flled
.o.o oaaaaaaaoa
ANT
ACTS I I{VAIIDATING WABMIIIY:
This rvarranty is void ifthis IIOT SPRING Portable Spa has been
subjected to alteration, misuse or abuse, or if any repairs on the spa
are attempted by anyone other than an authorized representative of
trhtkins )lanufacturing Ctrrporation. Alteration shall include an-v
component or plumbing change, electrical conversion, or the addition
of any non-approved* sanitation or water purification device or heating
system which contributes to a component or uniI fai]ure or unsafe
operating system, Nlisuse and abuse shall include: any operation of the
spa other than in accordance with Watkins IVanufacturing Corporation's
printed instructims, or use of the spa in an application for v;hich it is not
dcsigned. Speciflcally: use of the spa in a non-residential application;
damage caused by operatiotl of the spa at $"ter temperatures outside
the range of32 degrees F. and 120 degrees F.; damage caused by dirtt,
clogged or calcified filter cartridges (sec Spa Care and Maintenance
instructions in the Owlcr's I\,lanual); damage to the spa surface caused
by the use of tri-chloro chlorine, chemical tablets, acid, or any other
spa sanitizing chernicals or spa surface cleaners which are not
recommended b_v- Watkins Marufacturing Corporation; damage caused
by allowing undissolved spa sanitizing chemicals to lie on the spa
surface (no spa surface material can withstand this kind ofabuse);
damage to components or spa surface caused by irnproper pH balance
or other improper \'.?ter chemistry maintenance; and damage to the spa
surface caused by- leaving the spa uncovered while empty of \?ter ard
in direct exposure to sunlight (this mai/ cause solar heating distress in
desert or hot weather regions) are considered abuses and may
invalidate this $"rrant)'.
DISCLAIiIERS:
\latkins Nlanufacturing Corporation shall not be liable for loss ofuse of
the HOT SPRIN() Portable Spa or other incidental or consequential
costs. expenses or damages, which may include but are not limited to,
lhe removal of a permanent deck or other custom fixture. Any implied
warranty shall have a duration equal to the duration ofthe applicable
warrant-v stated above. Under no circumstances shall Shtkins
Manulacturing Corporation or any of its representatives be held liable
for injury to any person or damage to any propertl', hou'ever arising.
Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or
consequential damages, so the abor'e limitations or exclusions may not
appry Io you.
IEGAL REIiIEDIES:
This warrant,v gil'es you specilic legal rights, and you ma,v have other
rights which vary from state to state.
CUSTOIIIER SERVICE:
For emergency service, contact a Factory Authorized Service Agent
irnmed.iately. If you do not know u'ho 1'our local representative is,
contact the Whtkir)s lt{amrfacturing Corporation Senice Department at
the above listed address or call (800) 999-HOTT, Ext. 432.
A.
@H'SBrl!#
WAfKINSMANUFACTT]RINGCORPORATION @
1280 Park Center Drive. !'ista. California 92083 Lisled
_lrarlinr NlJnul!(er ]:r a!-rDr essrn* nd
'
r!.rrei rhe :idt ro
.tihotunulrberr;Lrrit,,. -i.rr,irsntr;"rrnDD
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
T D
Y
E
KKBTJA s
Incoapotltad
Conrirl{n9Engtn o.! Foundcra vcnaerH Barfert Palnclprlr i, 1':'i - , t A3aoclal. Palnalprla RoorJ:, !!r.!.j,.
,... ,.n,,1 : - hr,! ", ;:ii?"^?;i"^"-" ,ir"r l',,r. ]i,,]",11,-:,,':i ,:..;r :.:' 3li'-i il-;
.vttr ' h,,14i.
l]., {:rl tll01 t v,rr.r. 6\rn\e. rgOA-ige7 ) Ctrnri$ ll Ko;ir! Un,ri. S i,ol,r,it -i:r: i", Vil.j
l9tr:i JgrO) Jainres il AJ;,,r'5 -rJ!(lll G, i:ur
March 9, 1984
Mr. Jim McDonald
P.0. 8ox 1290
Homestead, FL 33030
Re: Jim McDonald Duplex
Dear Jim:
0n March 6, 1984, I visited the site and found that the
foundations for the duplexes were performing satisfactorily and
no movement was observed.
Sincerely,
0dell K.,Johnson, P.E.
Associ ate Pri nc'i pa'l
. OKJ:Khcc: Gary Muran, City of Vai l
o
RICHARO D. HALL PETEF| E JONES
RAYMOND J CONNELL POBERT \A1 I{ARRIs
JAMES C- PEFTRILL JOHN P MIIZNER
JOHN O PHILLIPS. JE| MICXAEL W JONES
JOHN I 1RIGG JAMES A RUF: JR.
EUGENE O. OANIELS OUNCAN W CAMERON
EOII/ARO H. II/IDMANN JOHN C.
'IUHNX^ROBEFI S, TREECE AF|.,CE A. MEN(
RICBARO A, FANNEMAN JEFFEFIY B, s'ALDETI
DAVIO R BROUGH M FREORIC A. RI-ISEMA
S^MLIEL O^VIO CHERIS CAROL M. WELCH
THOMAS R EROMBERG JAMES W ERITT
THOMAS N ALFREY
FToNALO V YE6GE h005,re701
DON R. EVANg lte2s,re76l
ROBERT M. sTE'ERT
OANI'L R. SATRIANA JR
ROGEF P COTfjIUARi G RIFXIN
KEVIN E. O'BFIEN
WILLIAM F EGGERT
WILLIAM JAMES BARBER
EU6ENE T, COMM^NDEF
AFTFiUFI R. KARSiAEOT III
CYNTHIA HOOGE SHEARER
R. CRAIG EWING
WILLIAM H O'ROIJTKE
GOFIDON L. V^UGH^N
FTCHAF|O A. VrrAL'rZ
.{craE. o. dcw torx ^{oorgrFrcr of colvrll^ aai6 oNrY
CHEIS A. MATt]SON
FIOBERI \& WAL'TER
JOFTN W TRIJEAX
JAMES A, SMITH
OEANA R. WILLINGHAM
KATHARINE J.
'(UNZEVAN M ZUCKERT'AN
CHARL'5 J, FRIEOMAN'
.TERFY L. CHRISTOFHEFI
RICHAFIO M. IUCAS
FOBERT A.9OIOl!|ON
M. STERRENBEEIG.RCSE
HALL & EVANS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
su rTE 2900
717 SEVENTEENTH STREET ,,-'
oENVEFI. COLORADO go20e-3351
303/5"3-5...,-22
August 3, 1982
G. WALTER BOWMAN
Mr. Steve Patterson
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: McDonald v. Weber, et a1.
Dear Mr. Patterson:
Vail, Eagle County, Color
occasions regarding this property but itthe last of these conversations.
This office represents Crosby Truckin and Excavatingin the above captioned laws or
the foundation failure op Tbts 13 and 15,hase TI ,
ed to you on
has been some
prevrous
time since
On September 3, 1982 I will be in Vail- on
concerning this lawsuit. I would at thaL time like
you and review your files regarding these two l-ots.
you contacting this office concerning such a meetingreceipt of this letter.
other business
to meet with
I would appreciate
upon your
Thank you.
yours.
B. Stalder
& EVANS
JBSr/cs
a
If50A Sandstone DriveVai1, Colorado 816r?
June 5, 1982
Mr. Steve PattersonBullding 0fficial
Town of Vail-
75 South Frontage RoadVall, Colorado BL6r7
Dear Steve:
I wanted to give you an update on the progress of our develop-
nent:
1. The exterior painting is proceedllg and should be con-pleted by the end of June, vreather pernitting.
2. The paving contract should be let this week and the work
completed by July l!. We have been requested by the Casolar Hone-qfiners Association (copy of letter enclosed) to add a parking pad
adjoining our driveway to the West on Lot l). The pad will benefitthe snow renroval process, according to our contractor. The padwill also benefit the water removal process auray fron our bulldlng
and onto the wesferly drainage easenent. I did discuss this with
Gary, and I think he agreed that the water drainage idea would
be favorablel however, I suggest you cover the point with hj-rt.
This would help to keep guest cars off Sandstone Drive.
After the pavlng is cornpleted ard we have a llttle rain and
consequently know the flow of the water runoffr then we will con-plete the runoff swales between the three buildings.
3. The Iandscape plans for all of Casolar are presently
being worked on, and Ken Matthe$rs and I are pushtng the entire
proJect and anticipate getting as much as possible done this
suomeraround the coupleted buildinge. It is ny desire to coordi-
nate our landscaplng with the Association and also to get as nuch
as possible done this sumner and fall-juat as soon a6 our paving
is conpleted.
l,lr. Steve Patter
June 5, 1982
Page 2
As you probably know, only certalnthis area. A.Inost all of the spruce and
been planted in Casolar in the last four
we a-re still trying.
tr
son
Should you have anygive ue a call in Vail ator Ken at 476-6056.
foliage will grow 1n
aspen trees that have
Jrears have died, but
questlons about any of thisr please
4?5-t+577 or in Florida at 301-248-1200
yours,
McDonald, Jr,
JWM/1gs
Xncl.
cc: Town of
Casol-ar
Vaj-I , Planning Department
Horneowners Association
.-,t.
-
ri
ti
il
ti!il
L
Mr. and Mrs. James W. McDonald, Jr.ff50A Sandstone DriveVail, Colorado 81658
Dear Mr. and Mrs. McDonaldr
your driveway paving
your drainage and water dispersal .
P. 0. Box 3796Vail, Colorado 81658
June l, 1982
pad to
As you knowr Lot 13 hasparking, but we feet lot lJparking apac€s. Also; thisthe road which is a serLous
I
space for additional outsidecould certainly uee these additionalwill elinlnate cars being parked onproblem at the conpleges to the East.
Very trlly youre,
CASOIAR DEI, NOvERTs
4/* n
KENNETH UA?THET|S
BOARD OF DIREC?O
j
::
i
r .r|,a i , .,?r!*#gdnflt*i$tfif,F*l.agffi{* q1i,
''tl
rl
The Association uOufO Iike to request that when you haveyour driveway paving gompleted that you add additioni.I pad tthe llest of approxirnatery rz feet by r8 feet to Drovide fortwo additional parking space pads. -This will as'eist the
. .l:1511-,:
krcorpoda'tt
Coriaohlng E |elnaaaa
7456 V\bsl Filh Averu€
Osrwor Colorado 6@2636 23? 6050
Fo{r|ldaat Mlchaetft. Barrefl
Oonavon D. Nicror
Mrlo S Kelchum DavidE Austin
Sp€cial con solla nl
A J Avan
E. vernon Konket (t908-i967)
{1923.1970)
May 3, 1982
Palialpab William I O Neal
N€ilF Ounbar
oon I Pyle Robert O Scarrow
Donald C Wsb€r Howard g Eroianing
Lerov € Tobl6. Jam€sB Davrs
John K ariqhl Martin S. Oldlord
Charles O. Keves
a.rocht. Fflnclpala Roger H. Kan66s
Rob€n O. Hend€rso.l
C. James Erir*son William R. Hantlton
Larrv R. S|/eKl John W. Mars
David D G lasp|o Rooer H. Smadss
James B Adkins
Mr. Mark Donaldson
Vlctor Mark Doneldson Associatea
1000 Llons Ridge Loop Draser M
Vail, CO 81657
RE: HcDonald Duplex
Dear Mark:
We have reviewed the llcDonald Dupler on site and have had
several dlecusslons wlth youraelf and Chea & A66oclates
about the foundation settl-ements Ln the tlro outer nost
corners on the north slde. We recomend at this tlmer that
a caisson be drlll-ed at the northnest corner and northeast
corner of each bullding to support the corners of the grade
bean. Thls caisson ehould be drllled down to the natural
material to a1lon a sinLlar bearlng sltuation as ls iu the
remaLnder of the butldtng. We would also recomeod that a
soils representative be ava{lable to verlfy the oaterl-al at
the. botton of the calsson.
I'Iith thts type of repalr, we would be supportlng the corner
on the same material as che reoal.nder of the duplex and
therefore settleoent should be the saue or very slnllar to
qrhat the renalnder of the house duplex ls experienclng.
Enclosed are three sketches for this attachment of che grade
beam to the baseoent na11.
Sinc erel y,
0de11 K. J
As soc late
oKJ/gb
CC: Jlm HcDonald
Steve Pawlak/Chen & Assoclates
=,#ffi
KKBNA
Inco.porated
Co|irultlng Earglnaaar
e,y|tQ 8' ,ttt-t-
1 Y_rq
'l)-.4r1
I
.n_\+/ \
oPPul^t p ',
€rf'q
rou (rut+ I
\.
rY?
V4" u, ft( e,JEE;
z LEQ'D
l ag*8*v4ot'-?- -.--{ 0e- 64,rtv. UJeuPeDI rt_ al a -'t: '| | ' ""4ft-d'u
I wa4 ff E*p hwrw
gcPn?uur
]|_F-:tp^L4,
A.5 v-€QD
fltrruT /u/ ftt
frsP H,+/, r/c
/l,f grrc-^Tt'E'
;t
C
.KKBNA
SZJob no'
tnco.oo.alcd
Coa.ultlng Englorc.a
)?Ttrre*erz-Z Z,sqo
i@ axcrl edtz
B l'-t
Srreer Z ot
." KKBNA
Inco.oortlc<l
conr|llthg Enganaa.a
t
Job rnfe Yl
"O
o rt a -.D-f..r, Pt-#.
"yyy?axq= -DI-+swtS ot3
(-
+ -u; + xo'-l-
&" Qaoe ArvL
uJe: rrg
.4
t lV\ .,+\\ \.e'& 1+'
?RY 'Px-* Jo rPT
%rlulaa* t.,J,rr--r---3
3 4o r*/ xl
6,, WALL
?r,aviDF. z fu? AS
ITof" j toT To rt't otr
o\t7
{1r z Q'ac-es
l/l
vl
,rl
Yr(l,/
r'l-(>---o
t,.KKBHA
Conslntbg €n9!r€..5
,"o,n"fiVoop4.p ,,gp;o^g37gao^".
s:bi.*t C?lssa d Ze en a 0J Ch€cked Slreel
=rl/Stga lttS
ry 2H5/r/!{lq
86,
{lt
]
CEP EHN
/J"E4ZFt<
l!y' tltaz
,(tr pF5 rt'a-
BdArn ga-rD
46i/a6T Fft
&pfafi
2-lz',U c
FElilF a
Futz- H
q
I
/1
\/
.,t-
-,-.\\(:"' ) GONSTRUGI'JON PERMIT
lm'ifnfltlZ I r rveeor
dep.rtrnent of oommunity dweloflilont
TO BE FILLED OI,JTCOMPLETELY PRIORTO ISSUANCEOF PEFMIT
TYPEOFPERMIT
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION
NOTE - COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
DATE \ -,-*uCI1018
nnn
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
ff:::Lor lJ r /5 gyt\
FILING Ca.salar U;Z &
JoBNAME:McDonald CIup. frF. Found,
OWNER NAME Kepalr
MAILADORE$S
ctw PH.
ARCHITECT FIRM
MAIL AODRESS
CITY PH:
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
Great Divide Const.
TOWN OF VAIL 8EG. NO.
a
ELECTRICAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OI]UAI XEGi. NO
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOIVN OF VAIL REG. NO
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL FEG. NO.
TELE.
|ha
l.TypE oFcoNsrRtrcTtoN II m tv/V I
2. occuPANcv GRoUP leeu rQrf,t
DIVISION 122.34
/.lEAtEoAr nacr.orqathit r1E w'\gL .
PERMIT NO.
-
2o
F
3{
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
PLUiIEINGfhiJilHli;; F;;;1;
MECHANICAL
Found.7,000
TYPE GROUP SO.FT. VALUATION PERMIT FEES
v R-3 7,000 BUILDING PERMIT 62.50 \
$sNv
PLAI{ CHECK 31.25
ELECTRICAL
NEW() ALTERATION ( } ADDITIONAL REPAIR PLUMBING
DWELLING UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
G.R.F-A.
-EEOROOfr,S -COUMERCIAT SYST
-COVERED
PARKING
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
UNCOVERED PARKING
-
NO FIREPLACES
UECHAIiICAL
RECR€ATION FEE
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CLEAN-UP OEPOSIT
USE TAX 100.00
(
INSULATION
TOTAL PERMIPFFES t93.7s
FTOOR
EXT, WALLS
ROOF
TYPE THICKNESS R.VALUE
S,"W{@ts"--s/&tr- ---
oNrNG ADMTNTsTRAToR o-irf - -
HEAT :ONING & BUILDING NOTES:
ELEC: I GAS:
SOLAR: I WOOO:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in lull the information requlred,
completed an accurats plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I
agr€e to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state
laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes,/esign
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinanq
AND THE OWNER.
CLOS
lr
NO ACTIVITY OR CORRSEPONDENCE ON THIS
TO BE RTFUNDED ,
FiLE. FILE ED AS OF 3/84. J{USU:AN UP DEPOSIT
r,r l.*
I
{
$
7
:,i
it'1
I
I
;.
I
n
i:,:
i.l
I
i_, t
l.'.
I
{
:
l
.- it' j._t .:l-ji iii il' -:'* lrl
"1.
'ili
':- ? .:. i:'
_-,: ."
, _ ';. ,.
a ":) ' ^:':,1 -:l rr
, .:; ..: ::'
.j i. ;. 1:;;:.
Q +; ,.. i,:
.-' :,.i \r: JJ
:! ''" '.'l,:: .I i: l' ,1.:.:i,r
!;r.c :jr I
i; I: ':_ q'
..: :
:, l" .'
;.- lt: ... .
-r:'':'-,,:r I -. ..
t rj .ri i'' ..'.':,:,tt .ri i ,t
-t, i -1.
':i. r"1 r: .i
:ll Iil"
t. ...i t1.. '.:
. ,, j: ..:.
i:r :; ,:' I::
l: X :" -
-,' _ l:' 'i
ttI
i 't
.::, ?
:-t
i
t:
ir'
-**-_.4.. ..-tr. f .a
q chen and associates
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
lotoio. rL oLCHrooE tPi||acicotoR^oo arlol r34.5-ta5r
April 22' 1982
Subject: Distress at Front Buildi-ng
@rners' Dr4:1exes on iots t3
ard l-5, Casolar Vail fI'
VaiI, Colorado.
Job No. 2I,135A
Victor l"lark Donaldson, Arcftitect
P.O. Dravrer M
VaiI, @ 81657
Dear Sir:
As requested, r,le ha'.re revis,'ied our letter of Apri-l 13,- 1982 vJ:ith
res-oect to-use of a pj-er type foundation to wrderpin tlre subject corners'
A pier forrndation is suitable for underpinning ard slpuld be designed
utilizfig an :'llcr,vable end beari-ng pressure of 4.000 psf' rhe pier
should orpletely penetrate ttre exii$5g backfill ald bear on tl1g natural
granutar Junsoifs iL an elevaLion equal to or belovr the adjacent basslent
ioundalion level Ttre fouldation learinq surface strould be verified by
a represantative of the soils engj-neer. setclsrent of tfe foundation
uraer tne relatively 1i9ht building loads is erpected to be n-i-rpr and
esserrtially occur duri-ng initial loadirtg-
If 1ou trave any questions or if we can be of further service,
rl a>co ,_=.1 .i
Very truly yours,
GISJ AbtD ASSOCTJI|ES, rNC.
- ./ :.'t tt
Ii
ffi,tst:fho.;+' --o.i
i tszzz i
"-Z -r*lt
ht-^,."n"-*tffift'bi'#
cc: Odell Johnson
*1-,*-t./ u
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
OFRCES; CASPEN . COLORAOO SPRINGS . DENVER . SALT LAI(E CITV
I
P.0. BOX 2574. VA|L, COLORADO 81657. (303) 476.2072
January 29, 19Bz
Town of Vail ,ATTN; Steve PattersonBuilding Department
Gentleraen:
We are requesting the imrnediate Final Electri-cal Inspectionnon Lot 1! Casolar Vatl II, for the third tine which youpronj-sed to conplete on lTanuayy 25, 1982.
We are also requesting an imnediate Final ElectricalInspection and C.0. on l,ot 1] Casolar Vail II. Al-l_ workhas been conpleted to the satisfaction of the fnspectorsof the Toxm of Vai-l.
@eat f,,iaide &natmetion
Very ,trul-y_-rylrs)*--&ffr
lhonas P. Weber
Great Divide Construction
We anticipate Final Inspection by January 2p, 19ge
t.\*'\
\\s.N
)s
vl,,
"v \'
!r
v\ 'sd,.
cl-.\-
,'1 Lt
K
4|) corusrnucrJCIN p'rnnrr
F:x1 lt;,.T[il\l I r rveeor
drp3rtmei'lt of oornmunity development
TO 8E FILLED OUT COMPLETELY PRTOR TO ISSUANCE OX PEBMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATIO
*,:::
rot 17+ tf tsLK
FTLTNG (mhtLhl-Z
-,oerun"e, il"Qa""/r/ Jyk,,
OWNER
uaL doaaess ///O &aa9-7d'9 4
c,TY Ud / ,^. f,To>n
ARCHITECT ,,*, l/, /41. flo'lol/r".r
r"ArL ADORESs '/" x 4'/
-
-, . t ftgclTY (/q, f Pa. rt? 7
G EH ERAL
CONTRACTOR
,*u 6rroTjt'aiJe,tu{-
rowN oF vArL REG. No. - Fa? -A
,ArE -r*=. 1/)6 - ?fi2"'" qL?ro{t
ELECTRICAL
CONTRACTOR
==...F5.-* _
TOWN OF VAIL REG, NO-
PLUMBlNG
CONTRACTOR
7- a
TO'.VN OF VAIL BEG. NO.
fv1ECHANICAL
CCNTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OE VAIL 8qG. NO.
OTHER
COI'iTRACTOR
r lR lr,l
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
TELE.
f
_ COPY OF PERMTT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITENOTE
DATE 0010i5
u
€
nn
PERMIT NO.
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III I
2, OCCUPANCY GROUP ABEH
DIVISION
CENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
PERMIT FEES
NEW( } ALTERATION I ADOITIONAL REPAIR
OWELTING UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UN
G-R.F.A.
COMMERCIAL SYST covjlEo PARKTNG
rffivEReopnnxrHcHEIGHT IN FT.
NO FIREPIACE
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
& EUILOING NOTES:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the inlormation required,
completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the intormation provided as required is correct. I
agree to comply with the inforrnation and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordin eT >fidable thereto.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACYOR FOR
AND THE OWNER.
/
)6-dY. -,#g**u;E ffi"a**A,%orl*,3323il
F. O- BOX re90
t7000 s. w. 272i!P STREET
TELEPHODTE [3O 5) 249-r2OO
October 16, 1981
Mr. Peter Patton
Senior Planner
Dept, of Community Development
Town of VaiI
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colo.81657
Dear Mr. Patton:
This letter is in reply to your l-etter dated October 13, 1981,
addressed "To Whom It May Concern" regarding our Quarter Owner-
ship Marketing Program. f will be very pleased to meet with
you and the town attorney at an early date so as to put your
mind at ease on this matter.
I am, however, very disturbed at what appears to be a very
unprofessj-onal procedure utilized in this matter by the for-
warding of copies of the October 13 letter to both the Booth
Creek and Casolar Townhouse Associations prior to the Department
knowing exactly what it is doing and being firm in the posltion
that it is t.aking. This is apparent by virtue of your request
to have us brlng copies of contracts. covenants and declarations
with us. We specifically request that you forward no communl-
cation to anyone whatsoever concerning any of our marketing
procedures until such time as there has been a proper €letermi-
naLion made and agreed to by all part.ies and,/or a posture taken
where there is a difference of opinion clearly reached and each
knows the exact position of the other party.
We were very careful in the preparation of our documents re-
garding this mat.ter and also in the timing factors as to the
division into the quarter ownerships and the recordation of
all documents.
L
I
Mr. Peter Patton -2-October 16, 1981
The recording of all documents occurred prior to the effective
date of the current city ordinances regardlng time sharing.
In no way, shape, manner, or f orm, do we eonsider our quarter
ownership basis anything suctr as t.ime sharing and I am certain
the town recognizes this, and if it does not, then it will be
neeessary for us to make the town knowledgeable that probably
30 to 40% of all units owned in the town of Vail have some
form of multiple and,/or corporate ownership and division and
usage of the respective units and properties.
You may also wish to check very carefully the ordinances to
whicir you mention. Tirese orriinances make very little sense
other than as grandfather type provisions. An example of this
is as follows:
"The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of
any provision of the Vail Municipal Code is
provided in this ordinance shall not effect
e4L.tr!@-"
our total rights, property divisions, declarations and covenants
all accrued prior to the effective date of the ordinances. As
our property rights had accrued prior to the effective date of the
ordinanee, the zoning change included therein smacks of a taking
or inverse condemnation, in which case, 1f pursued by the town,
we should be entitled to monetary damages from the town'
You also stated in your letter you are sending a copy of this
to Mr. Jim McDonald, as you are assuming he is stj-ll the owner
of the properties. This is difficult for me to understand
when I called Larry Eskwith's office tr,.riee while on my last
trip to Vail to discuss this matter with him, leaving messages
as to the subject matter, however, f r,vas unable to locate him.
I then called him the following Monday and Tuesday and did not
receive a return cal.l and then on Thursday of last week I made
the 5th eaII person to person to Mr. EskwiLh indicatlng to
him that if he had any question concerning these matters to
please let me know and we r'.rould be happy to discuss the matLers
with him. Tt would appear that you do not have the covenants
and declarations which are referred to in your letter, however,
Larcy askeil George Straw when we were in attendance before the
town on our last controversy concerning acquiring the GRFA
for Lot 12, Casolar, to which we were entitled, what type
of time sharlng was McDonald doing. This is approximately
three months ago.
fury'vT::JbD,.,,*afr.Wp**/rp/&r4 gM
t
Mr. Peter Patton -3-October 16, t98t
As we have informed Mr. Eskwith, we presentty own only fiveproperties (potentially B units) within the town limits andour future development plans and properties are elsewhere.Accordingly, this rather small- involvement would not seem towaffant major judicial involvement on the part of the town,
Bear in mind that we are totally desirous of cooperating withthe city but we do anti_cipate a proper, respectful and pro-fessional method of handlino
truIy,
ames w.McDonald, Jr.at IJaw, P.A.Attorney
JWM:kb
cc: Mr.
Mr.
George Stralr, Esq. w,/attach.
L,arry Eskwith, Esq.
&'"."7/f :-,//,9,',*Urt
.Mh,*.t4zAq g"M
Oct.ober 14, 1981
Mr. PeEer Patten
Department of Comunity Deve lopment
Torln o f Vail
75 South Frontage RoadVail, CO 81657
Dear PeEer:
JusE a brief note to acknowledge
regarding 1/4 ownership in Boorh
Dupl ex .
I spoke with Mr. McDonald today,
week of October 19th. It is his
during rhe week.
Sinc ere 1y ,
cRossRoADS REALTY, LTD.
Bilt Sargenr
BS: pw
cc: l,Ir. James McDonald
Mr. David Fales
Mr. Ceorge Scraw
receipt of your October 13 rseno
Creek G-4 and the Caeolar
and he plans to be in Vail the
intent to reet with you eometime
PO B$( lztr4\AilColo'rado 8[658
CmemdsShopttgCerter 300-41t6-*300
. vt'1. colorsdo Et657
Peler Patlen
Sen|or Pltnnet
DeDartmenl ol Communily Developmenl
. .box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
Crossroads RealtY, Ltd,
P.O, Box 1292
Vail , Colorado 81657
department of community development
October 13, 1981
Re: Booth Creek G-4 and
Casolar Duplex
To Whon It May Concern:
I rn writing in regard to your lecent advertisernents in the Vail Trail
regarding 1/4 orrrnership in Booth Creek G-4 and the Casolar Duplex. The
con"""t is that this type of "time-sharingri nay be violating our ordinance
regulating tine sharing. Time sharing is specifically defined i-n our
fegisfat:.on and is not allowed in the time zone districts where these
properties are located.
It vrould be beneficial for all parties involved do get together to clarify
the rnatter and to reach an understanding' Irn sending a copy of this
to Mr, Jin McDonald, as I trn assuming hets still the owner of the ProPerties.
Please (.pnt lct ne as soon as possible regarding setting uP a neeting to
discuss this. It would be helpful if you.could bring with you all relevant
docunents (i.e, contracts, covenants and declarations).
Please contact me at the Town offices, 476'7000 x237.
Sincerely, - ?'/ .t' ^.
' ,-7 ."; I-A- (Lt L"-
A. PETER PATTEN, JR.
Senior Planner
r_lq
APP: bpr
cc: Larry Rider, Larry Eskwith, Town of Vail Attorneys
Booth Creek Townhomes Condominium Association
Casolar Vail Condominium Association
Jim McDonald
' fifiFfffA t
.Incofpofated
Congulting €n9lneer3
7a56 lvesl Fiffh Avenue
Denwr Coloredo 80225
303 232 6050
T.ler 45-€70 INDEvCO DVF
Milo S Kelchum
E lbmoo Konk€l
(r9231S70)
Mchael H 8atren
Donavo^ O Nickel
Dstrd E Ausltl
A J Fyan
(r 90&1967)
Pnncrpels Jo\n X.8'€hl AsEoc'are Ptinc'Pel3
Charles O Xeles
Doq I Pvle W iam B ONoal Jam$ n OavE
Donard C weber No'l F Ouobrt C J8hes Erctson
Leloy E Tobter Robart 0. Scartow
Howald B Brownrng
JuIy I0, l98l
Mr. Jin McDonald
P,O. Box 1290
I{omestead, Florlda 33030
RE: MeDonald Duplexes at Vall
Deat JLn':
Your contractor has advLsed us by t.elephone that the back-
flll has been placed behlnd both of the duplex buildlngs and
that no slgntflcant movement took place. Based on thaf la-
formatl.on, lre expect that any future movenent will be negliglble.
If you have any further questlons in thls matterr please let
us kppw.
*wF,
',i4,#Hfrist$
iTlilti. t "" sE rn' u\'r'
____"--.-r$;ttutrtdil"neoEA/eb g:fi +zsr gio.r
'd-,#:rr.^,.*t{$
A,4" ' s
fr;t{
|t
/'/
JOr-iNSO N _VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.
t
('onsulting Enginters
W. B. Johnson
Flobert H. Vo iland
S. J. Archulera
David M. H oudeshell
Roberr B. H u nnes
H. G6ry Howell
Frances l. Wells
July 8, 1981
Mark Dolaldson, ArchitecL
.
1000 Lions Ridge Loop
Drawer MVai1, Colorado 81657
Re: l4cDonald Duplexes @ CasolarVai1, Colorado
Dear Mark:
Please find enclosed the calcufations for the above mentionedjob. As you know, simple frame structures often do not warrantformal calculations unless specific areas require analysis.
Our approach is to overview the building plans in order toidentify maximum loading conditions. These Ioads are thentabulated piecemeal with brief calculations dj-rectly on the
red-marked work sheets, as indicated by the enclosed building
sect ion.
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate togive me a ca1l.
Very truly yolirs,
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.
RCA: fw
Enclosure
#2305 CAN YoN BOULLVAI!IJ
63A5 !!ESI52ND AVLNUL
coLoRADO AO302 444 1951
coLoRADO 80002 420 2055
a()u r ot ft,
gl?rx soN-VoILAND-ARcnr|| jll^ Consutttng Enstneen
ar FcA s,ns /ar/7r/p,, toL
cHKD. Ey- DArE pRoJEcr tWaDa\ltJ1 D DLI?LEL:i
t
-
SHEET
EoULDEn arr+ls6l
ARVADA 420.266uo/orL
PRELIT.
i
I.l
._l
I
i
SHEET IIO A OFLD^rE bf7 f eD t,77to
CII'(D. BY- OATE t tl|cl..+,*.tr;rP Pulf(*X
'Ault3,t'tl FIXAL
6l-
I lii
&,iluJill
4-7..,
,Ja
I-I
I
-l
I
I
i
t.
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
i
R'I I*\\
i(*,,
':'' r'& '
.'.-
_*.-.*
,\-
b..
*{5
-={
R,\ Illd ,lF
-t
5
J
a,
x.
\!o
\s\
;
fr\i.
qq'i 1if'*qix tt$ l
It., [ \
fl.\$
!$s\:\:
'-S
$
N
o
'\,A!
l
I
I
*.
A.
(\
$
\
K!t
\T\
\t\\{
s\\l
I
\$\\
$t
th
{tQ\-
:f
:
--f
rJ
$J
\l
u
Jhen and associatf in!
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST FESULTS
/
APPLIED PRESSURE _ KSf
lr t LJA Fig 3
7 ir
VICTOF|
MEMElER
*l*
A,MERICAN
DCINALtr}SON
INSTITUTE
VAI L FlUN
.t'A\FCHITECTS
oF sricHtrEcrs
,July 7, 1981
Mr. Jim McDonald : -
P.0. Box 1290 l
Horestead, FL. 33030
Dear Jim:
This is to inform you of the progress of the remedial constructionwork being performed on your two duplex projects in CasolarVail: More-specifically, I am inc'lirding'a iynopsis of ine p"o-posed remedial nork for framing corrections to be agreed upbn bythose concerned parties and to be executed by your dontractor,Great Divide Construction.
l.|eb, of Great Divide construction, has been completing the remedia'lwork for both buildings as shown 6n Drawings SR-l prefared byJohnson-voiland-Archuleta, Inc. The excavition, cbmpiction iesting,placement of tie-back rods and reinforcing steef, plicement ofconcrete and concrete testing has been performed. 'Backfill
andcompaction has begun and nork should begin soon on the framingcorrecti ons .
PuTnq the 'investigation in recent weeks of your construction failure,both J.V.A. and KKBNA engineering firms have visited the sites,analysed the prob'lems and agreed-upon certafn remedial constructionto be perf,ormed. Also, overseeing'these investigative efforts wereMr. Steve Patterson, chief building officia'l and-l'lr. BilI Andrews,town engineqr^qnq myself. Based oi certain structural defiiiencies,as well as deficiencies noted by the Town of vai'l Building Department,the three engineers-have proposld a variety of solutions ior ttreappropriate remedial unrk.
Recently, l.leb and BiII Andrews have summarized a ',list', of actualremedial work of corrective action to be perforrned. I have reviewedthis information and am submitting the foilowing for consfderationand approval of those concerned parties prior t6 cormencement offraming corrections,
Lot 15:
1. Straighten any bowed studs
block at four feet maximum
1000 LtoNS rtoGe Lc}oF
oRAW€R M. 303 4 7 8i.1128
(load beaning or non-load bearing) andvertical spacing.
2. Pressure test plumbing system as per Town of Vail.
3. Leyel existing stair construction.
4. Genera'lly re-nail any loose plywood roof or floor deck.
FIESOFIT COMMUNITYcoLoraoo E}1657
l
Slir'iTl33i".'t
Page 2
Lot 13:
1. Add 2 x 6 studs in between existing studs at east and llest endwalls, first level. Install new sluds plumb, re-nai'l fitywoodsheathing at 4" on center and block at mid-height of whti.
2. Add nlw 2 x 6 studs at party wall same. as (1) above and filr1in cripple wall to bottom of garage slab for bearing ds perthe contract drawings. Sheath out side of party uaj'ls with
one layer 5/8" type 'X' GllB each outside face with standarddrywall nailing schedule
3. South wall first level to be pulled into plumb by kickingbottom plate out 1" to oyerhahq foundatioil walL- Re-anc[orbottom plate and re-nail p'lywood sheathing at 4', on center.
4. New 2 x 6 stud wall to be erected tight fitting under South
enq of garage floor construction. Sicure to eiisting wal'l
and block at third points.
5. Remove and rebuild stainrays to level and plumb condition.
6. Fil.l in gap with solid blocking (continuous) between concreteand wood framing at East and Hist end walls,'lower level .
Secure to concrete end wal] with 'Red Heads'i.
7. Re-nail all roof deck at 4" on center.
8. straighten any other bswed studs and b'lock at four feet maximumvertical spacing.
9. Pressure test plumbing system as per Town of Vail.
10. Genera'lly re-nail any 'loose plywood floor deck.
The above items shall be inspected by the Town of Vail Bui'lding De-partment for final framing approval. Not included jn the "strilctura'|"items above-are any.flooring underlayment, p1 umblng of door and
wrndow openings, cosnetic repair or other related ,,finish,, items.
This 'letteris being quickly dispatched to those concerned partiesfor review.and conun6nt. oui goii ii oi course to ouiiin ipiiiovalsas required by the Town of vai'l to proceed with constructibir andcompletion of both buildings.
It 0
!4r. Jim McDonald
July 7, 1981
Page 3
Bob Alson i-s sending Johnson-Voiland-Archuleta's.original ca1 -culations directly to ne by bus today. I will then iorward toBill Andrews as requested by him. :
P'lease 'let
proposal s.
VMD: I rd
cc: Johnson-Voi'land-Archuleta, Inc.
KKBNA
Great Divide Construction
Mr. Steve Patterson
Mr. Bill Andrews-,
me
I
hear-from-you regarding the hand'ling of theseshall await your response.
V'ictor Mark Donaldson, AIA
!r7ND AJ OHN SON VOILA
( tt \ulttnE Lngimtrs
RCHULETN, INC.
W. B. Johnson
Rotlert H. Voilah.,
S J. Archttleta
David M. lloudeshell
Robert B. H unnes
H. GarV Howell
Frances |, Wells
June 29, I9B1
Jim McDonal-d
P.O. Box 1290
Homestead, Florida 33030
Re: Slructural Repair of Lots 13 & 15 Casolar, Vai.l
Dear Jim:
fn our meeting of June 1, Steve Patterson of the Vail Building
Department requested that we provide a figure for the anticipated
maximum movemenL of the repaired concreLe walls on this job
under backfillinq loads. I have conferred with Steve Pawlak at
Chen & Associates and Odell Johnson at KKBNA concerning the
various elements of the deadman and tieback repair system. We
have agreed that. once the system is installed with the soil
around the deadmen compacted and tieback rods tighLened, theposit.ion of the North concrete walIs should be established and
recorded.. We anticipate that no portion of these walls will
move more that t" when the backfill is placed.
If we can be of further assistance please cafl
Very truly yours,
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC .
By_i
Robert C- Alson
RCA:nm
cc: Odell Johnson
Ilark Donaldson
SLeve Pawlak
Steve Patteison/
Tom Weber
2305 CANY()N A()ULt VAt!f)
6385 W!51 52ND AV L Ntir
B()Ul Dl rr. (l()LOflAOll lln:1O2 4.14 l(rr)l
AUVAtTA, c{rt()nAD() tlooo2 4?o 2o!t!'
' q<tf.5*' *i&{.rcr.&""*
-t+:"| KK6NA
C.rrrrling En3;rD.r!
;at5 !i.: : -i :"{ue
D+artt '-:.:'zr.a &,
3C3 r..2 ii3L+' 4t4::0 nrDEvCO DVF
Foutl{'or. t t|ch.-.t lt. Brr.en
Dgnavon g. tir:\el
Itr.io S rie::r':rm OavKl E Aust'n
AJFr?n
E \!ric. XJnlel (190&19671
(i9?3-t9:01
lJune 22, l98l
r'--.h*r--d
Mr. Jin MeDonald
P.O. Box 1290
Honestead, Florlila
P.lDclp:lr Jchn li 8.,ohr Alsochr. Prlnctt|.t.- C,rar,es D -Xeins
Oon I Pyle !'..lr.a:n I Cl Nrar Jdmes B Davrs
Oo,,ard C Webe, Ned F Ovdba. C James Erickro.rLerr': Tobler AJ:1€'l D Scallot
. H}nJrd g. S.orntng
.-..-..
33030
RE: . cDonald Duplexes in Vail
Dear Jln:
Although your previous correapondance with our firn has beenwith 0dell Johnson, r have been in the deliberaEr.ons wlth hinconeernlng your problems ln Vall. Also, I stopped by the siteon lday 14 oo ny way to acother project on the r^restern slope,so I have seer the cracking whlch has been of concern to yo.r.r ara respondlng to your retter of June lg, slnce Odell dli nothave a chance to do so prior to hl.s departure on vacation.
Wheu ue wroLe our report of !4a y 19, we undersEood that thebackftll proceilures on the two buildlngs were somewhatdifferent. We und'brsEood, primarily fion the contractor,that the backfill placenenr behlnd rhe builillng on Lot l!tnvolved the use of a large bulldozer, whereas backfillbehirfd the bulldi"ng on tot 15 was primarily placed by hanil.You recently furnlshed us a tape recordlng of your conversatronarrlth the lndivlduals who aerually did the bachfllllng work,whlch lndlcates the backflll procedure uas essentl.aliy the
sane for both bulldings.
Slncer tn.their flnal backfilled condltion, both bulldlngs areessentlally the sarae, we caonot explaln why one butldlng
noved more than the oEhers, We had felt, based on the ore-vlous lnforrnatlon, thaE the differeace nlght be due, at leastparElally, to the different methods used of backftli place_
ment and conpaction. rf, in fact, tbe backfill was placed usingthe sene procedures for both bulldings, the dlfference innoveoenc between the two Is probably due to a dlfferenceln the condltlon of the sorl below the foundaLions. }Je havero way to know what those dLfferences actually are.
o
It{r. Jin McDonald
June 22' l98I
tage 2
I{hatever the sol I cond itLons r,rere at the tine the backf t I I
lras placedj our analysls has shown thaq the vertlca.l pressuree
under the foundations caused by the lateral loadlng fron
the backflll would be substantiallt-htgher than Ehe allowable
soil pressures glven by the soils engloeer. Tttese val_ueg
are refleceed ln our letEer of May 191 indicating calculared
soll bearlng Pressures of soroething over 7000 psf, conpared
to the allowable pressure of 3000 psf whlch the soils englneer
had recormended.
I hope these additional co*-en!s wlll be helpful to you.
Please call 1f you have further questions. a
Sincerely yours,
.A/l'\,-.il ( ,4 +--
/UK Lq < ' 4/ o44'vr\
Davld E. Austin, CCE
Prlnclpal
DEA'/gb
CC: Ma rk Donaldson, Archltect
Bob Hunnes/WA - Boulder
Steve Pawlak/Ctren & Assoc - Glenwood Springs
.,i
o
Bowman
lnc.
Projec-t 81233
June 16, t98L
-I'{r. Robert B. Hunnes
Johnson-Voiland-Archuleta, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
2305 Canyon Boulevard
Boulder, Colorado 80302
In accordance with gur recent conversations, we have completed
an analysis of several geotechnical aspects of a foundation
problern which has developed in Buildings 13 and 15 (the buildings
on Lots 13 and 15), CasoLar VaiI II' VaiI , Colorado'
our efforts to date on the project have included two conversations
with you. We have also reviewed the following documents:
I. Soil and foundation investigation reports for
Buildings 13 and 15 written by Chen and Associates' Inc..
dated october 8, 1980.
An inspection letter rePort by Chen and Associates, Inc.,
dated November 10, 1980.
An inspection letter'report by Chen and Associates, Inc.,
dated November 25, 1980.
A Letter and. 1og of exploratory drilling by Chen and
Associates, Ine,, dated l'lay 11. 1981.
5. a field observation record report dated April 22, 1981,
by Mr. Robe'rt B. Hunnes.
6. Letters dated May 19 and May 20, 1981. written by
KKBNA.
our understanding of the circurnstances surrounding the damage
to Building 15 are as follows:
nuildings 13 and 1-5, separated by the building on
Lot 14, were constructed simultaneously- Excavation
for these buildings vras accomplished in Fall, 1980,
and the foundation systems for both buildings were
3300 Arapahoe Ave., Suire 204, Boulder, CO 80303 Telephone: Boulder 303/443-1975 Longrnont 303/651'3870
,
143_&1
c. l
es
ICAL
CSL
:iate
LTING
lHNrc
EBS
rrle
oci
suL'
T ECI
INE E
,LTIA
:CHN
EEBSNhn;
2.
?
4.
I.
L
o oRobert B. Hunnes
June 15' 198I
Page Two
under construction in the winter cif 1980-1981.
The foundation systens t'emained unprotected during
the Winter and Spring and were backfilled by mid-April
198l_.
2. The backfilling procedure used was to compact, with
a mechanioal tamper, the lower several feet of the
backfi11. The upper 6-8 feet of the backfill was
compacted using a Caterpillar 955 loader operating
para11e1 to the wa}ls. The face of the'eut upslope
from Building 13 was shallower than that ups)"ope from
Building 3-5, thus, in the case of Building 13, the 955
loader operated fully on backfilled soil.
3. We understand that the rear foundation waII of Building 13
has rotated inward at the top and that a footing
supporting a shear wall buttressing the back walL of
Building 13 has moved dovrnr,rard. The same type of movement
has been recorded in Building L5, but its magnitude was
much less than that recorded in Building 13
4. Ground water \^Ia s encountered in the excavaLion for
Building 13. The ground water was seeping from the
side of the open upslope cut and contributed to formation
of a soft area near the northwest corner. This area was
reviewed by Chen and Associates on November 15r'1980-
They recommended that the soft soils be removed and
replaced with coarse washed gravel . A later report by
KKBNA indicates that the area was refilled with "clean,
4-inch to 6-inch diameter rock".
5. Building 15 has suffered some minor cracks in the
foundation wall but the rotational phenomenon noted
in Building 13 is relatively minimal in Building 15
and damage. to Building 15 is considerably less-
From our review of the sources of information documented above,
we understand that the bearing pressure 9f 3'000 pounds per
sguare foot recomrnended by Chen and Associates in their original
report was exceeded. Accoriling to KKBNA, the calculated toe
pressure of the shear wall footing was on the order of 7 kips
per square foot, Exceeding the design bearing-Pressure-is a
proUtern' but in our opinion it iinbt-the only Problem that led
Lo rotation of the foundation vrall nor is it the probabl-e'controJ-ling
cause. other problem areas are as follows:
L
o
Robert B. Hunnes
June 16, 1981
Page Three
Thank you for consulting
opinion, further analysis
free to conLact me.
Sincerely,
1.The major failure area in Building t13 .pp"ars to
be ovei a zone in which ihe soil was removed and
baqkfilled. This zone was wet during and following
exCavaLion. To the best of our knowiledge. the::
backfill'was not inspected. If 4 to 5 inch diameter
rocks were used and if the rocks were rounded to
subangular; they coul-d have moved into a denser
configuration upon loading and thus contributed to
the footingsr settlement.
We have reviewed the borings. and test pit information
provided by Chen and Associates and have concluded
that Lhe bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square
foor which was made without benefit of the test borings
was appropriate. Our review of the boring logs indicates
that a total load bearing pressure on the order of
51000 to 61000 pounds per square foot eoul-d have been
used for this material,
3. -We understand that the foundation systems were not
covered and protected from freezing and,/or moisture
during the winter. It is possible that the voids
in the natural or backfilled soil beneath the footings
became fi1led with water and froze during the winter,
further disrupting the soil structure.
4. In our opinion, the major cause of the movements in
Buildings 13 and 15 was the procedure used to backfilL
the rear wa}ls. Using what we consider to be conservative
estimates of loading (an unloaded Caterpillar 955 placed
on the completed backfill) and soil structure interaction,
we have assisted in preparation of calculations which
show that the soil pressure at the toe of the shear wal-l
footing was in the order of 1L,000 Pounds Per sguare foot.
This is a first approximation, but it is our opinion that
a more rigorous evaluation would demonstrate that the
additive effect of numerous Passes on numerous lifts
would have resulted in a bearing.Pressure substantially
higber than this.
with us on Lhis project. If, in your
or evaluation are required, p1-ease feel
OCIATES, INC.
2.
a
CHARLES
By
..tg$;ii;..iiiiir.n
:1 ;- rz 7 !! i;'--=
"ffCCB,/rkk
Bowman,
{'&t#tt''.t
.tI
" ft-' .i; i'. "'-: -a
;' .-. ii
-.. ,- -- =..:,-.,'- '. ::':'
1'
't
trmr 9- t98t
Ur- .}Jrr Erbneld
P.OL Bs* tgF
lfon$terG- ?.lorfdb 3303.* ^
:nnl Jb trs&nf,$c?& st*erai;:#-lir
hrr J&,t
Sr lrrve rcnlaled rht rrlpd fnnlag srtros !l aniF herrrr thgfollarrlng couqaa!.lt
,i r,
lr .
ll:
t..,.il
rl. :'
il':'
I tlr
rrl.
't.,1
Ii:
i r.t '
lf l:
it, -.
r iii
t.:
fE:,
l?,,i
.fEt
tn:l
t:+.
sre rrsrc rrtl. hsp.sosil bErrlng_Bnurlg ?r\Bt e*e apl[ortilt"r}'I f?f 6ut of ph.rab- llrie ahoulG nsE €s$gF anlr pobl*nr --
. tc tt". butld[r4; Deseuse of tbr lrt]'rlrofi ahwchtrrg *hteh gs- nrftre! ta ths SBrrfa'. te rradd haxtvrf, rero-tot tlrtc ntr$llair.Ds rcnotlef go th! S r 6 rr,uila.
lits rl.D rcrteuri the ur!! oD th* s6uth cfde o{ tho hult&rbg,
uhtcTr fs *Irc rgprosbrtq$tr ,. SFrf sul of DSlBtb ltrfc. trlrt.l-tr- rrb8- c $ost bearfng rrrl! sr ftols I att$Btufat rrlerrpoinl, tt .durr not nsrG Gcte ldurbtd; Btacc !t coutrtrr] raCnCiuc aie: , -" {ont}.}arayail ft puoEsElf *hautt ba gbrrbaf. tt eoulG cantft},-: ; 1l {EbeC by rCfilf,ogr thc. bDttol} pfetr our approxfnsrclll l* arJ .
:'-:. olc+rg rBs fourilatfon rlall btl rmrorsfrer*ry ;; but tlrct .... .
..:i . shouJG ntB Grur3 dtffEeuttg, .; ,
. - " 'a... - I! faop hnrr tof qrcEtfons on' thi* uncierr gtrclrr c*tl. '. F r.:i
htntlprl r
oKIITF
GCc lllctar llrh Don*Idesn' bb ltuunrdJ$k
,__, _____, ,FF' ,. r_.7."t
- --
--.#:-
--;-:-E-
---:-
' ; '+,
t .'ririiil
ItsttEcrlt* tgr ldrtdd E, rlusrfa} OCE
,l
tte
J OHN SON -VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.
Consulttng Engineers
W. B, Johnron
Flobert H, voiland
S, J. Archul€tr
D.vid M. Houd6shell
Rob€r! B. H unne!
H. Glry Howoll
FrrncGr l. Wsllt
,fune 9 ' 1981
Marb Donaldson, Architect
1000 Lions Ridge LooP
Dra\der M
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mark:
Enclosed are our two Field
McDonald Duplexes for your
Very truly yours,
JOHNS ON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA,
RCA: fw
Enclosures
2305 CANYON BOU LI VARO
6385 wEsT 5?No AvI ltuE
Records to date on theObservationfiles.
rNc.
&
!tM Etn
-BOULDER, COLORAOO a030? 444 !95r
ARVAOA, COLORAOO 800()? 420 ?O55
o
J OHN SON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.
Consulting Engineers
o
W. E. Johnron
Bob.n H. Vollrrrd
S. J. Archu l6t.
Osvid M. H oudeshcll
Rob.rl 8. H unr.!
H. Gary Howoll
Frsnces l. Well!
FIELD OBSERVATION RECORD -- THE McDONALD DUPLEXES
Victor Mark Donaldson -- Architect
5-29-81 Met with Donaldson, McDonald, and webb (Contractor)
RCA at Lot t3 at 10:30 A.M. The backfill had been removed
from the units and though the framing was substantially' complete, the job hacl been stopped due to building
movement problems,
Lot 13:
Various cracks rrrere visible in the basement walls due to
stresses created under backfilling loads. We discussed
the deadman--tieback repair proposed by JvA and agreed
that the stress would be significantly reduced in the
walls making patching unnecessary.
The basement slab had cracked and heaved causing the
non-bearing stud walls in the mechanicaL areas to push
up under the garage floor framing. Several studs in
these 'wal"ls were bowed, as were some studs in the
bearing walls directly adjacent to the stairs. we
agreed that the studs of the non-bearing r/talls couLd
be cut free, straightened, and re-nailed to the bottom
plates. The bowed bearing walL studs will be bl-ocked
at third points. The st.airs which were slcewed by the
adjacent ryal1 movement wiLl be re-built to a level
condition. In addition, the concrete floor slab shalL
be leveled with a neht 2" t.hick concrete topping in the
basement storage and mechanical-. room areas poured
. acljacent to the existing strrd wall plates.
Various stud walls in the basement area were racked due
to the garage floor and corresponding first floor movement
' to the south. The knee wa]1 supporting the south end
of the TJI framing for the garage floor had moved 3/4"=
out of plunb, though the 2x6 stud wall direetly below it
in the tasement appeared straigh!. None of these stud
#
rTE M 6CR
z3o5 cANYoN aoL,|.l vaBo
53a5 WEST 52ND AV€NUE
' souLDER, COLOBAOO 90302 .144.1951
aFvaDA, coloFAoo aoql? 420 2055
t
Field Observation Record -- fhe McDonald Duplexes
Victor Mark Donaldson -- Architect
Paqe T\.Jo
5-29-81 (Continued)
RCA waII conditions appeareil severe enough to be a detriment
to the structural support of the framing. However,
McDonald suggested and it was agreed. that for safety
purposes a new 2x4 stud waff should be constructed on
the north side of the existing 2x6 stud bearing wa1l
supporting the south end of the garage floor joists.
This wall should "be tied to the existing stud wall
and extend to a tight bearing below the garage joists
over the length of the uni-t.
The double 2x6 stud bearing wa1l running north-south
through the basement area did not have a continuous TJI
over the top plate on its west side. This condition
had eaused the east wall to receive all the load from
the double bearing walLs above bowing the studs under
compression. Webb stated that he would correct this
condition with a new stud bearing wall built tight below
the first TJI east of the existing bearing r,rall. The
studs in alL these north-south bearing wal-ls should be
blocked at third. points and sheathed with drywall as
called for on the original drawings.
On the south side of the unit, the exterior deck had
moved south with the first floor causing the.knee brace
supports for the deck beams to slide forward in their
angle .seats as they had not yet been thru-bolted. It iwas agreed that. folJ-owing the tieback rePair installation
and any straightening of the framing' these knee braces
would be shimmed tight to the back of the seat angles
and bolted as shown on the original drawings. The exterior
plywood sheathing on the east and west walls should be
re-nail.ed.below the first floor l-eve1 .
The second floor bedroom floor areas appeared to be
unlevel adjacent to the stairs due to sLab heaving in
the basement which caused vertical movement of the bearing
waI1s. Webb said he would .investigate the'amount of
floor level change in both units and report the results
to us later that day. He found that the maximum difference
i over a 20t-0 floor wiatn was !/2$* in Lot 13 and L,/4"*
in tot 15. v?ebb felt that these rn'-ere within noimal framing
tolerances and we agreed that no additional work was
,needeil in this area.
I
t
Field Observation Record -- The McDonald Duplexes
Victor Mark Donaldson -- Architect
Paqe Three
5-29-81 (Continued)
RCA
Lor 15:
we found io severe problems in this unit. The only
item we discussed was the cutting and re-nailing of the
non-bearing studs in the basement meqhanicaL room wal-ls.
t
T"rtt4'fur*9-' lqTl
(
frT""* Qarc-*'
PMfreu
t
ft;Jwf e-'j W tu"lfulAdnzd* "
t f&^irs/ s,R'W
M""-4 */sa/"''a"a
7 &ffin//'"'&" *"'0 I
'"4rt0Wr'*
fls
4,,M/^{*rya*^eq
'kry%,ffi://dr/d
qfulartcd
f* +? A-
*Jtf-1 n
Ld? / FD r^al il W"i ryrZ U-Wru,
,ri fl'eP sl/r.,rl
t4h
,-olLofl +
lrrl
frg?
trT,l ql
/*\
\\k
aU
,qa---. 7
'!r',1 f. 't 'lt l
5l "r'7
Jo)
vy tl.6
s<:J*i
e.iql
+{-'i*ia
+1-b
->\*h
f
t-..r
r-.'
>T
D>t=
F
--
t.-
.-
r.-
r'r..l-l
>t
I-iJ'l
-l
:
fl
I
I
1
- n '-- ,fI*ytr,t 'rr| l"t!
-nl:rt +rt ! 1
\ /-l,-
---.t "#-\,t''. ),, r,3 f +-'":/
,, *+o',t
I
. ,r,o,,, ,{$ ?
=ryi--ffi r
/A/ z)/), ./2,u'-../) ; t;a
\ \ =-,-i-'*\ \\'cci
\'",t-'^, La, -nr5. 'rd^r"c? :p5:'t ,t3
q\ fl 5-tt'4^l:-'t=
.z'io!'ro l't
Xtt'/"' t'
ai.t i," b
t
tl,7u F, t,',fr kt+ rc Lr" rifr, ld^a'q
-r/{?7",,^n -1
+ nlk 2''& aiol,
.; lo L*. tftft73fln
7l&.4".
e
/,'V1/6tu4 /,/ zs
o
/a'-ao
d
\{o sln
Ilk a7,
t
%.*L[-ft\
6
/a.gore
a
ri ift'
r's
I .-,
al,'i Arlg, {. '.,,r,r..--!. \b| .t 3
rJ t :i.-\ 'D,..'- glc*a- , :*r"1Co- \-oS*'.^- q\r;
(l*",t \.-.-i- U..o-e-- ' ^.-r't..^S o-,1
alo-ll^ ." &'') trc""r'€ '---Q
l--'--'r
]-'-....l
l--\a
l--:S
O---ir
l<:
3-r.+r-t t
O-{ve-{v
l*<v
.r).U e-\|J
a-
e-
G*
e
t \:t
f \*n
C!:-: -Bu[r\^."-^Ls qL--\
"
C. i\
C r\ d^-s [ ,^,,tLt-.Q \d \s
2,J,*l 'cr,...s C,-.*l.)t \b\ \:
fu lar..J.c\^,,r- .^-* a.*;- t.^-o. ct,,-^S-
?\1 Fo1*.s "-.2 "'"-t,\\d,,^.,.-L:., re*-rru
**e \'5! \5\ cthu*'- \..4 {"-.- .Q^,.,-L,'--'^^* \:
b.^,-," l.*"q-Q- \.* \b
,
"'rl2-S' [, *='^C a-\'. \o-,- w,.= ."--Q
I
-ot,.o-D 'roc^t.r'u \.6* \S
por, )'& C-^-^.,..-^C \Cs- !B {- 5
' G -T.*'.-f.-r. 54 q[n
d".J
-{
{
it
*t
1,-'-
f-
f:-.-
t:--
t_i5
,t.L"
.t lai
n
.t -'-ilair^ Ql,/\r /\\t __-_/J\ _
'-i)r,'^^''.{ ,.i \L""
\r*,',.* iot
-,-:) / tt-
-_r_a__ _ _?Te t_._' \f4 U\ t--
1 o i r--
i f---
t.:-
t-'
C.-
f-,
C.
C
F
C
C
C
F
C-
F
F
,'(
C
t
C
C
t
C
C
e
e
?
t
t
a
, ^at
\b t't
\
.n e1. _^
\- _ : - '--<_\, !-7 \ u
\ r,. r*) ,' \.1
Frc-uJ.'J-r ";..'r'r-;fd.-tr,r-;tA "
:-.o
F r '-trl--,
t
,
t
t
Rr
=rr
Gt-"
[xt-'-+
.l tttluo .-, ^' L4n tp(N {**, \oD\L tt'L.o
{a-* I 1^v,^,t.--,J \oo\.''"-+.;'v-^,-.
G-oJ..Q -^$- r'.* "t **\
\S si- \\\,*
-\1= ',C\'Rts\ A\,-\"f-- c<..Q-*.a'. r \o.
iaT 13 \
t^.rJ -.-^J S
latL".Q-
\r',f, *o
v),?.
2'
IU' IJ
_\-- ---_____1 ----ri--
\^J ,f .\^ r5-;/\ i\/* )
(l t-
\r I /?
Itl
I
I
Itl
Ir ?r/flI ,f\Ii!r.
,.. l\l
f - ---1 o.z'to1" 'i,o11
2,|o'G4!'t6
IJ,f-sL+,,
s4 7
/6Z
R",
7?5
'tY,.
"2
?'-t t-' '- - ,,(t
.l*tlr|[g*..artr||F|Ftar}t
'ltf ar! : r ..- afii
ear!*- a?s,a>-lFlaestrr|tfi*a-.1.*.iit$tdsqB.l
{nar*;r $a}.r'tt le},$,gil&r?,&, ftrt'rt$:* l+.!r.1 Sf/r. t G,.tr\qra-.{'!t ?trf
r rr.d.ib..* !16.19;-{rll*tlto-
$rm t, ll[i]
*if,rH.* a*do,ihtt*
61Al--B&tltt Jr+.rF A''1|t|rt q.h- G J}!6lr*xr.Rt! ttr D3hi-.ra*rn|tttrr+
$trelal
&i\ t rl*.Ort}'ra $fr.-l'?r'6 tlt+-
Dcrr Jtc*
Ut nls ra*tcnsdt tht. $It rfsr|,.fas- s.dDlttcf 11 Jrltorsr, bl}'i|Cr ifrc$rlthrr &s- ruil tlrsc ttre fcf&,reqg smril*r. f- ni* G.aat{rn$tg, cr lhe rcil lr SFef roil lt. etnrtC grt1;Et. .l
firt€ttlr ugtr.tlcr*- sf llls tutlriiqn lg *lll lrce lprll rt* b{lilk'g Daeh tc ltt artgfnrl 1o.fbtor.hsreG*r. R n*omctG thrt fie tuC!&lng Drl' "lctt j
&r the lrrlltfau. th0 lt' t* tu?- l* rceornna rnrr t{fittcrrrl r!ctrG** bt g*d.
Ificrn clleulf ba lrn flctrchr ekag: Ckrl Itrqtird-gftifr rllll er cretr r!& m! fftia ttc-tnlr darg Itte {0r-Q rrell *fitb e. a*rkrc il||G!ng .il. Gru rt*|rttn3
6f-S lrr f*g* lle Br4 ctlrr r*tl. ft* tlrruirr ertthe l0l-$ *a!l rtnrld }g f-$ t!!n :*G !Sr-S rrelt-rn03-O til fron\$e liF{na!l-L ErIi r.hs ldsltlonll reilr ailferil $re t lftr itrcct€sitGal tlc-!ra& rorls cau&il bc diri! 3tr I lr8t" I
Ctrsster f&-trch roih- et tffiq$G rGfiryt to 6fl ft* l*., I. sn! thl tL ?I& r 6 r S-SE]!/ tG. rtilccd tl Ft fi& r l
€ r 0t-t-
Xts; JErrhftnrldF.& ggs Pgnlb,#ilcrir $lo,r&frr ttSS*
ilE .!ta lbBnlttlre &4ihxa
l4re lt st Ei
Itb hoe lmt. nacC*edl a rerrt*rrl SBSrsdql aftsa GfIfE!. rttlr.tta e$cue. trtlfLrtlons tnrlsftrL
Bflh Inrrrr crilfffc*icm rrl fel ttnt eolrtrlctlsn .n th 9to:Irci.
3aG gttlnufb
lf yr* ltse:rW q$"B3tcrrar gluer call-
$tmrnr.lyr.
_-" 6r 'ci!
$lrrl!, H. $rhcco*r P-E-
ifirfrorf,e$Gi .i. ,f
r" .e'. '1.':[' c i-f ' , ;--r -
Patr|crcd h* E&FfG E* &rrtf*D CGC." f;ilnelgrlri GGr Sletrr Hr,rh Um*ldemllschlGect - toD ltunnnCllts..
BOULDER 444.i951
ARVADA 42S20554, ZcA D^rE 5 -27-l'1 JOB r Z
CHKD. 8Y- DATE -' PROJECT
{.to
?s6
Fae /n/ Foe *t br-+t :
Eet,. /5,7k
sprte-r*/e. 15,7/z,u ' 4!b
Fat< /h"Q Boo
5frq/e = lo lB
sHerr xo / or
PRELIH.
cueur 'lbxJ4ur>toN Ft AL
-
-De.steil r€ADMaJ 'TtL EAc*a FoR. xlozt| 4ALL
ArSLlrv1E O
9 lMPLE
'PA
kI
E' ?287
]sgE=Zlao Fcp
3 pe4i>nelJ a,<J l/ear,q k/ALL
4*e. /o!a snxrLkl. aF
'ftE gqckg
e /o:o/se
\Lo/]D = 2,2-:(o) =
EFP t z,-t-z)*"'"PA,bg(e
lF p€nDMP^-t /3
WAD lrl€ J
z3/4 .-
Pc'F 4 qaryte.p
4o ,.eP :
lf-
lF
@nrc
la\ I rR = y'466 rcrr. \ *--T-
t.'\ I.)-;e'r-r- t t 1,7a'
AKE jLo DZEP:
E= fuat nc
rr 7!p D#p:
E= z4oo P"e
4- L*lerH
* trrtJ+rl
? tErrarl
Re& = 54
qEQ' 7!g
F4 = /!7
eeJtu/L/d'i.3
JOHNSON-Y BOULDEB
'4+ARVADA 4IG
SHEET ilO Z OF
z&ry*) I r i I l
pnotzcr h4eDan l4tD D4PL*" eaeut.
AaO :',,'.FL=,6ETt ?/,a r-sr
ft,t/sr4 44ft1ur7 uAT Tt/EgtDs:
,l1l1l
€4
^t€4a,
MaMAJT, a*l_i -q+FE/D€ trA(E d2F W4Ll-
A= 8a t/ Jt/o".
&:' qzz,s 0o)bz)(4_f
,= :; ffiffi " ""T,L_ri ::;i,
<_-
chen and a ssociates, i nc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
NLI FOIMAflC
EtitclNE€ar c
5080 RD. 154 r GLENWOOD SPRINGS,COLORADO 81601 r 3{lil/94$7458
May 11, 198I
subject: ffiffir"rtii*n;,
D.plexes qr Iots 13 and 15,
Casolar., Vail II, Vail,
6lorado
Job llo. 21,135A
Victor l4ark Dornldson, ArctLitest
1000 Lions Ridge l-mp,
Vail Rur
Vai1, Oolorar& 81657
Centlsen:
A.s regue-sted, rre perforned o<ploratory dri[inq at tle subject site
to ob'tain additiqral subsurface prcfiles for analysis of the obsenrcd
st-rustural distress. I€ previ.ously cordrUed subsoil irrvestigations for
ttte 2 duplexes reported under Job llurbers 2I,135 ard 21.136 dated OctoberI, 1980. O:r firdings are as follols:
Site Corditions: trre sites are presently ocanpied by 3 story dlple<esffi. rtre structr.rres are supporuea-on corrrete waLl
and fooLing for.rrdatisrs @nstnlctd in about Decerber, 1980. The rplrill
forndaticn ural1 is about 14 feet high. ltre dcnntrill side is at saLkout
basenent lerrel. lte backfilt against the Lq:hill fourrdation ua1l was
reportedly placed abollt the midd"le of April.
'ItE obsenred brildirq distress is confined nrainly to the WhiIIfourdation wal1 in both urdts. Itre distress aF[Ears to @nsist of
lateral and vertical lro\lerent HtLich has caused-verCical ard scne diagornl
cackirg in the wa1l. Fl"oor slab cacking, apparenlly frcrn differential
settlqrent has ocsurred.
Tte distress is nost severe on Iot 13 ard relatirreIy mi.nor on lot.15. I€ understard the cracki-ng was first rpted qr l.ot 13 and progressed
rapid.ly irrnediately folloring backfilling procedures. On-s-!g soils
tere used as backfill to entry way level. On l.ot 15, tjrc o<cavation
width was relatively Danr!'lrr ard baci<fill was reportedly placed frcrn topof the excavation. fri Iot l-3, tle backslope of the erccavation was
relatitrely wide and tlee backfill rnaterial was placed with track equigrent.l€ urderstand a porLion or all of this baddilf nraterial- has subseqt-Ently
oFFlcEs. o€NvEi, coLoRADo / coloR^Cror srflrircs. colonaoo / casP€n. rYYoMrxG ,r EAL' LAKE ctTY, utaH
I
hnaldson,Victor l"lark
I'aay ll, 1981
Page I\rc
ArdLitect
been rsrrnred. Prior to refip\.al, ttp bacld1l1 srrrface gfade was relatively
flat ard abort 5 feet il elevation belc*r adjacent. Sardstcrte Eirte 40
to 60 fe€t to tte rpr-ttlrest.
Ttre residence 6I l.ot 14, located betlreen the trNro subject lots'
onsists of a frare stnrcture of similar size and @nstrusticn to tlose
nrder onstrrrLiqr. I{e Lrderstard tfe residerroe is about L J'/2 years
old. @nsiderable backfil.I settling has apparently ocorrred agairst
t]le qphi1l forndation uall wttidl tns caused tle oncrete dritmmy slab
to settle abcut 1 to 2 jndes. the naiority of ns'.rqent does rnt appear
to have occarred witlr-in tlre tast fery rreeks. l€ rl.derstard that a re€nt
visual inspection of the bside rerrealed rn significant tx-lildirq distress.
bcploration hogram: Ure to tle rapid structural rflr/srcnt observed,
ffif possi5le hillside irlstability. sirc€ previous
subsurfae oploratior ccnsisted of stnllcnl test. pitting on the si-tes,
one relaLively deep elploratory tnle r.aas d.rilled about 15 to 20 feet
off tle north,vest oorrler at eadr of the lots. Graptric logs of tle
subsurface profiles enorntered at t}te test tples are ststn on Figure I.
As irrlicated by tie logs, ttre suber:rface profile is relatively rniform
and consists of a nan made fj-Il depth overlyiag rediun dense to dense
graveJ-s ard cohbles w'ith scnre boulders in a silty to clayql sard natrix.
lbl-e 1 was drilled to practir-a1 rig refusal at. depth 32 feet. At lble
2, very hard siltstone bed:rcck was enountered at depth 24 feet and
exterded to the lrwdmrn depth drilled, 32 feet. Results of gradaticrt
analysis cn a graLl diareter drive sanple frcrn the naturaf subsoils
are presented on Figure 3.
l,lcisture cont€nt of the subsoils was descri-bed as being noist ard
no free water was encourtered at tjne of driDing. E]gtt€d Erc pipesas :
insta}led iJr hoth test holes for future water lerrel nonitoring. lten
checked on May II, ro free wate.r was present.
Tb provide .additiqral sr:bsoil infornration, Iogs of 5 elPloratory
holes drilled in Janua1a, 1981 for a proposed develoFnent directly rorth
of Sardstone Drive rarcre revieqed. three of the holes '"ere drilled
withdn about 50 feet of the road*ay. Subs'urface profiles encowltel€d at
these holes revealed a ccnbjration of sarxis, gra\rels ard cobbles jrt a
silty to clayey nratrix. Ilo free water was encountered to the nuxirn:m
depth drilled, 24 feet. rtese 6 holes uere subsequently ded<ed for
water develotrrEnt. llcle l, Iocated dircstly across frcrn Iot 13, fudicated
no vrater to the present trcle depth, 21.5 feet. GI tle upkr-il1 side of
the lot rpar Lions Ridge I"rcp, water was lreasur€d at de-pttr 17 3/4 feel
belor existrng @4-1d_,surfacre.
Oonclusions anl Reccnnendations: Based on the subsurfac.e corditions
les located on-site ard in the adjacent
1ot upslope, the obsenred building distress does not appear to h: associated
witfr ni.ffside i:rstability. The subsoils consist predcrninantly of nedii-rn
dense to dense granular soits wtrich harre relativety good shear strength
Idson,Victor l"brk Donal Arctdtect
I.,lay ll , 1981
Dada qahraa
chacteristics. kesents of a regionally high Srourd r.ater table utridt
could ad\rersely effect hillside stability does IDt appear to eldst.
ReqionaJ. bedroc-k dip is gener^l]y dor^rn to ttre rprth r,itrich *oul-d erttarce
the fong tern stabitity.
Based on q;r observations ard kro,[edge of the @nstn:ctiql, ttrc
distress appears to be related to locatized settlsrcnt arrl lateral wal}
Itorsrent. A cfibinaticrr of tle folloling soil-related events my have
cqrtrilruted to tlE di^q!1isss.
(I) Ecessirp rretting of the subgrade at footing.leriel occtrrred during- eraavation irr nid lbr/snber. 1981. The ttettjJtg was ap'parently the
result of sncr nett and possibly scne natr:ral [Distilre. tlo soft or
*et cc'ndiLions vere reported on lot 15.
(2) Report€dfy folloring stabilization of the sr:bgr:'le cn Lot 13,
cqstr:uction of tle for-rdation ard franirrg proceeded ttuouqh tle
winter. PrecauLicns to pre'.rent freezing of fo:rdation bearbg
soils was apparently rpt taken. Additimal netting of tie subgrrade
frcrn snorr nelt rmy harre occu:red qr botlt lots.
(3) Srrbsequent backfiUing to entry vlay Ievel censist€d of a rnirrirrun 14
f@t depth. of t}is 14 feet, an apprcn<inrate 5 to I fot deptb cn
Lot 13 was above tJre origilal grade ard about 4 to 6 feet was abo\re
original grade on l.ot 15.
Desi.gn dralvinqs irdicate a 30 inch footilg suFports the uphill
fouryiatj-on raral.L ard a 58 jnctr fmtjng supports tjre cantilerer.ed erds.
Allcpable bearilg Pressure was taken as 3'000 Psf. Backfilling to
entry way level r,'rculd have applied an additional 1?50 psf Pressure at
foundation bearing level. Thi-s rnagritude of surdrarge applied orrer a Iarrge
area r*cuLd have a significantly greater effect on settlslEnt tlun the
narrow walJ. footilgs. If ice lenses had forned and subseguently thawed'
potential settlsrent wrrld be ilcreased. Mditional loadirg frcrn
constructiql equigrent nray also har,re adversely effected the structure.
@nsidering tle assr-ured gnanular subgirade, npvetrEnt shouLd stabilize
relatively rapid.ly ard replacenrent of the backfill should nct cause an
addiLj-ona-l- large anor:nt of settlenent. Tb facilitate resistarrce of
Iateral loads, deadnan onstnrction can be used. Ttre dea&nan should be
posiLioned beyord an inagirnrlg line o<terdilg tp.,ad frcrn the lq.er
footilg level on a 35o angle away fiun the walI and turied into natural-
granular subsoils. tJe estfuiate a distance of abouL 20 feet ard a depth
of 5 feet will be required. The deadrran can be sized utilizilg a
pa.ssive earttr pressure of 400 psf per foot of depth. A safety factor
at least 2 stpuLd be taken. Ttre dea&nan stould be poured reat h the
erccavatj.on ad backfill aborre t}le r:nits sfpuld be ccnPacted to at least
95t of stardard Proctor density.
Backfill against for:ndation wafls can c\cnsist of on-site granular
soils free of material larqer tian 6 irrches. Since scne seepage was
Ivictor Hark hnaldsot Arcfdtech
llay 11, 1981
Page Four
errcmtered trt Iot 13 durirg excavation, rre reccrmerd about tte lcrer
third of tle wall backfilt ccnsist of r*ashed rocl< conrected to tlE
urderlrajn qfstsn. As desigred, tle frwrt oorrer fcotings at eadt unitwill bear cn baclcfill ne@rial ad there rnay be a hi.dl risk of for:ndatistsettlsent. Ito redue ttds risk, the bac*fill sbuld be curpacbed to at
leaot 95t of stardard Proctor density adjaent $E outside wall. arrl the
foortings strculd inpose less tlran 1000 psf bearing pressu.e. TtEfoudatior ualls stpr:ld.be braced during ocnpacticn.
If 1ou hatre any qrestions or if r.e can be of fi:rtler service,
please ca1l.
Very truJ-y lncurs,
cllEN AND ASSmI]ffES, rltc.
SLP/jw
cc: Bob mnnes
c/o Jobnson, Voi.lard, Archuleta
O'Dell Johnscn
c,/o KKBNA
F
rl I , 135.\LO(;S OI: LXPI,ORATOR)' IIOt,ITS
tlo I e I
Lot 1.5
IIole 2
Lot l5
7/t2
so/ 6
3r/12
WC= 6,8
- 200= 19
40/6
29/6, S0/9
s0/ 6
37 /12
s0/ s
rs/6
rs1/2
t
l0
F
I
F
Fig. I
frrta"aone bcdrock, very hard, greyish trecn.
E
E
I
Ir
LEGEND:
Fill, silty to clayey
Gravcl (SC-GC) cobbleslcdiul dense to denso,
sand € gravel
and scattered
rcist, rixed
rith cobbles, loose.
boulders in silty to
reddish brom.
clayey send
Standard Penetretion
10 blors of s 140 lb.srrpler 12 inches.
Tejt Sanple. ASTM
haner falling 50
D1586 The sytuol 7/tz
inches were required
indicatcs that
to drive the
r.S
b
s
Disturbed Eult Selplc
lHltnur""."s stottcd lgc pipc instarled to depth shom
I
I Pratical Rig Refusal.
NOTES:
(1) Test holes rere drilled on llay 1 and 5, l98l with a four inchdianeter continuous flight power auger.
Surface elevation of holes within t I foot of.building
No free yater yas
"n"ountereil in the test holes at the
when checked on tr,lay 11, 1981.
l{C = htater Content (t);
-200 = Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve.
(2)
(5)
(4)
entry ray level.
tine of drilling or
Fig. 2f2l,l35A LEGEND 6 NOTES
!I" and associates. inc.?
2'HA
'HRurN 15 MIN 80 MtN. r0 MrN 4 UtH I MtN
CL Y TO SILT
GRAVEL 30
LIOUIO LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
Silty sand
u22
OIAMETER OF PARTICL€ IN MILLIMETERS
SAND
95
5 1 ,lr stLT ANo CLAY 1 9 *
PLAsrrctw rNDEx *
FROM
Lot 13, Test Hole 1 at 14 6 19 feet(combir
'50 'ro'30 'lt
4
z
8.o
oz6
Fz
I
o
4
F!l
a(
Fz
oG
G
& gravel.
7HR
r5 MIN €o MlN. 19 MrN 4 MIN 1 MrN
CLAY
'O
SILT
r19 438 a
.oE-
50..
Fz
60()
20
DIAMEIER OF PAFTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
GNAVEL !I
LIOUIO LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
tI SILT AND CLAY
PLASTICITY INDEX
FROM
u s sI
f 21 , 13-5A GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig
KTBF^
laalttF.tl.a
Caatel{Fg E tl6...r
7a5C W.'t F |th AYrtr'J'
O.ov.t Co5r.(b $226
ill.Tt8* *t""oo""
foundata
Mio S. Kllchu(n
ipecid clt$ulanl
E rrrmon Ko.*d
(r929!9701
Mahrd H. Brrrrfl
Doo.Yon O. N'ckel
Oavd E. A'rls!!l
A J. Byrn
(r9olt96n
prr,!.rp.rr f"5I; Bi,ftlr* ar.o.l.r. Ftr,nrp.rt
Bll.Ti?""... [il"flq"'"3.]""iT!il; 8iJl*,'
r.srorE.lobr.' llil,,r";'Jl"JlL
l,tr. Jin HcDooa Id
P.O. Box 1290
HomesEead, Florlda 33030
RE: Jio l'lcDonaldrs Duplexes - Lot 13 and 15'
Dear Jimt
We have revlewed the probleos lnvolved wlth the buildtng on
Lot 13 and che movenent that has resulted' We have also
reviewedthebul.ldtngonLot15andfoundthat'lthasnoved
very llttle conpared to the butldtng on Lot 13'
Iile have , Ln our report dated l4ay 19 , recotmended thac the
bulldtni on Lot 13 and 15 be addtrlonally retnforced agalnst
ro.r"r"ni by the addltlon of some tle-backe to deadnen' Tte
bulldlngs tn Lot 15 and 13 have had Ehe backfill removed,
which sioulcl keep the bulldlngs from havlng any addltlonal
roovement. Because the bulldlng oo Lot, 15 had very llitle'
lf any, movenentr we feel that constructlon caa proceed on
tfrat Luftafng provlded the backfill Ls not placed untll a
deaCnan tfu-U"ct systemr or 6ome other addltlonal supporE
Ls 1n placq.
If you have any questlons oD thts mattert please call'
May 20, 1981
Odel l K. Johns<in, P. E.
As sociat e
oxJ/eb
CC: Vlctor Mark Donaldsont
Bob llunnes/J.V-A.
Archl tec t 6
Slncere lY t
oKKENA
Coarotu.'g Engt-rr
7.!g F6l Fnn a'..r,.
V,.r C<.a.o'r 665 7:2 ra5l.rt ata3:! rfloEvco DvR
vro S Xelchum
!tacol consui.^l
€ \6rno.r Koi\.|
(r92'r370)
il-ay 19 ' 1981
'''*4
6.
7.
8.
Mlc|lael H gar.e[ Prlnclprlt
Donavon O NEle!
Davd E. Auiba D.n I Ptla
O,onetd C Webet
A. J. Fyan t.roy E. Toult
| | 90&1951
At.ochl. hn.tp-
J.m!3 F. O.vi5
C. Jarnei Era\Fo
.john K. Brqhr
Chades O KcyE5
ur! ,am I O Ns.r
lrorl F. Ounbaf
nobd.t O- Scrron
Ho*atd B B.oinrr''!
!1r. Jlm McDonald
P.0. Box 1290
Honestead, Florlda 33030
RE: Jin IIcDonaldrs Duplex
Dear Jio,
Since our neetlngs on I'{ay 6th and May 7th' 1981, we have ln-
vestlgated the problems lnvolved on yout bulldlngs on Lots I3
& 15, at Casolar VaiI II, Vall, Colorado. We have had ex-
tenslve discussLons wlt.h yourself, Ttomas l'lebb the contractort
Bob Hunnes of J.V.A. Structural Engineers, and Steve Paslak
of Ctren anil Associates' the solls engineer. Ttre inforuatlon
we have received from Ehese people ls as follows:
1. The solls rePort recomrnends a maxlmuo sotls bearlag
pressure of 3000 psf and an equivalent fluld Pressure
of 45 ocf.
a
3.
The sotls are grartular wlth soue clay and ellt.
Ihe soil was not frozen when the -qgnc.rete was cast forii. i."ir -
tec r i6i-E-as provlded after the casting. the footlngs
a ecerober 1980.
4. D.rrlng the excavatlon for the bullding on Lot l3t
water sras encountered on the north-west corner. Ctren
& Assoclates revlewed the situatlon and reconmendFthat
t
I fom aTeu-En-d-iep'IaEe lt. wlth cleau 4" to
rffilcated that this was done Prior
;;th" casting of the footings.
On t'{ay I and 5, 198I, Ctren & Associates drllled teo
addlttonal holesr one above LoE 15 and one above Lot 13,
aotl dlil not find ary water at Ehat tine.
The foundatlon walls were backfllled Ln rntd April I98l'
The backfl-ll was placed for the buildlng on Lot 15 by
hand, and hand tanping nethods were used for conpactlon.
the bulding on Lot 13 was backfLlleil wlch a 955 cat.
After the backftll was I'n place, the bu1 lding on Lot 13
starEed to Eove and develop cracks. Ttre bullding on
Lot 15 di.d not develop cracks unEll apProxlnately a
week I ater.
t
9.
Ilr. Jln McDonald
Hay 19' l98I
Page 2
10.
The contractor has been taklng DeasureEeots to EoEltor
bulldlng movementa. Tho6e rneasurenentsr and the pattern
of crackLng, indlcate rotation of the entLre concrete
foundatLon wall and footing systeo on lot 13 away from
the backfill. Very llttle Eovetrent, and only nl-nor
cracklng I-s evldent on lot 15.
The slab oa-grade on Lot 13 cracks frorn the north-
west corner at approxlnately 30" for lOt-0 and then
back to the north wall at the party wall. Sinllar
cracking occurs on the east half of the basernent. The
slab elevation at the crack ls as much as 3l4- above the
slab elevatlon next to the north wall. The bulldlng on
Lot 15 has sLmllar cracks in the slab on grade but only
hairline in s1-ze, with no slgnificant movenent.
The backfill has been renoved froro both bulldings since
the moveuent began.
12. ltre cont.ractor has dug down to the top of the footLng ln
3 loeatlons anal verlfled that there has been no upllft
of the out.slde face of the waII relatlve to the footlng.
f3. Ttre contractor' lndlcated the placement of Ehe relnforclog'ln the cast.-in-place waIIs rdas as lndlcated on the drawlngs.
lle also lndlcated that no corner bars were provlded at
the corners.
It appears that. the Preosure from the backflll ls practtcally
all reststed by the tso 8r ltalls at the ends of the north wallt
actlng as shear walls. Applying the loads frora far north vall
of the building backftll to these two walls, we flnd an ad-
equate safety factor against overturning of 2.0. Eowever,
the calculated soll bearl-ng pressure under the foot.lng at the
south ends of these walls ls over 7000 psf, cornpared to an
allowable pressure of 3000 psf recormrended by the soLls engLneer.
l.Ie expect this high soLl pressure caused soEe seELletrent of
the soil under the foatlngs at the south end of these 2 walls,
resultlng 1n sone bullding rotation and the cracking whlch ls
evidenE.
In our opinlon, the bulldlng on Lot '13, noved more thao the
bullding on Lot 15 due to the dlfference 1n backfll I placement
neEhods. Also, sirce the norLh-pas! corner of the bulldlng
on lot 13 moved more than the north-east cornerr sone dLfference
ln soll condlttons probably exlsted. We suspect sone voids
rDay have been present ln the rock flll noted ln f4 above,
reducing the resLscance to high bearing Pressure.
It.
I
ru
-t
,t4- .o
chen and associates, inc.
CONSULTING ENG!NEERS
o
lErL i FOUTaOAnO
ENGINEERING
5080 RD. r54 r GLENWOODSPRTNGS,COLORADO 8r601 o 303/9447458
*Y l1:_1e-'-1-
Subjecf: bcPloratory Dr:illirg,
Structr:raL Distress of
ttpler<es on Iots 13 ard 15,
Casolar, vail II , vailt
Colorado
Job No. 21,135A
Victor l4ark brraldson, Arctdte(t
1000 Lions Ridge tmP,
Vail R-rr
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gentlesen:
As requested, r.e perforned exploratory drillirg at tlre subject site
to obtai-n addilional subsurface profiles for analysis of tJ:e observed
strucEural distress. I€ previously ondrrted subsoil jnvestigations for
the 2 dr-rplo<es reported r:nder Job lftnnbers 21,135 ard 21,136 dated Oc'tober
8, 1,980. Orr firdirgs are as follcasl
Site Condilions: The sites are presently occupied by 3 story duploces
ffi. Ttre stnrctures ar€ suFported on corrcrete wall
and footi11g fowdations constl:cted in about Decsrber, 1980. ltre uphill
for:ndaLicrr wal1 is abut 14 feet h-igh. Ttre dcrumhill side is at waLkout
basenent. Ievel. lte backfilt against the r$r-ill foundation uall was
reFortedly placed about the m-iddle of April.
lte observed brildfutg distress is confined rrailly to the tphill
fourrdalion wal1 il both wtits. Ttre distress aFpears to onsist of
Iateral and rerticaL novsrent vrtdch fns car:sed verlica] and scne diagonal
crackirg in the wall. FImr slab cracl<irtg, apparently frcrn d.ifferential
settlqnent has occurred.
The d.istress is nost severe on Iot 13 arri relatively nirtor on Lot
l-5. lb r:rrderstard tle cradcing was first rroted on Iot 13 and progressed
rapidly irrnediately follodng bacJcfifling proc-edr:res. On-site soi-ls
r.rere used as backfill to ently rmy leve1- o:l Lot 15, the excavation
'*idth was relatively narrc^r ard bad(fill was reportedly Placed frcrn top
of tlte excavation. eI Lot 13, tlE bad<s1ope of the e><cavatiqr was
r:elati'uely wide and the backfill material was placed wi-th trad< eqtaiFent.
!€ urderstard a portion or all of this baddilt naterial has subse4ently
oFfrc€s oEHVtF. cor-oBADo / coroRAoo sPRlf.Gs. co!oR^oo / cAsP€F YlYOI|llvG / SALI LAXC CltY. UrlH
o
Victor t_4ark bnaldson, ArcldtesL
I'tay 11, 1981
Page T\Nrc
been rsrcnred. Prior to ranural, tle bacldill surface gfade r,las relatirrely
flat ard about 5 feet in elevation belo^r adjacent sardstsre Dri\ie 40
to 60 feet to tle rPrt]wrest.
ltre residenoe on Iot 14, located bet!€en the thrc subject lots,
consists of a frare strusEure of sirnilar size and constnrLicn to tlpse
urder constn:ction. t€ r-l'rderstard tle residerrce is about L V2 years
oLd. Considerable backfill settlirrg has apparently @ctrrred agairst
the r-philJ- foudation lr,al-l vthictt has caused the consrete driv*ray slab
to seitle abcut I to 2 j1rclres. Ihe rnajority of rp\rsrent des rpt aPPear
tO have occr.rrred witldn tie last fe9r vrceks. I^le rnderstand that a recent
1ri"u"f ilspection of tlre inside revealed ro significant brilding distress'
D<ploration Program: D)e to the rapid structllral lrovellEnt observed'
there was a concern-of possible hillside jnstabifity. SirEe previous
subsurface eploration cmsisteA of shall-ctu test pitting on t}e sites'
one relativefy aeep exploratoqz hole r'as drilled about 15 to 20 feet
off t.})e northurest orner at eacih of the lots. C'raprric logs of tle
s1.,ls,rrf.ce profiles en@ultered at the test troles are shceJn on Figiure I'
es ildicat& Ly the logs, the sr:bsurface profile is.relaLiyely r:rriform
and consists of a rn n nrade fill dept} overlyilg nediu'n dense to dense
gravels ard cotbles with scne boufders il] a siltlz to clay-ey sard natrjx.
fuf. f was drilled to pracLical rig refusal at depth 32 feet. At Hole
2, very trard siltstonsbedrak was encountered at dePtl 24 feel arul
&te,6.d to the n&yimJrn depth drilled, 32 feet. Results of gradaticn
analysis c,n a snal-l dianeter drive sanple frcrn the naturaL sr:bsoils
are presented on Figr:re 3-
lbisture content of tlre subsoils was descrjled as b€jng noist and
no free \^,at€r v,ras encou'rtered at tiITe of drilljng. Slotted F /c piPe was
installed in both test holes for futgre water le'.iel nonitoring' lltren
checked sl t'lay 11, rp free water was Present.
Ib provide additicnal sr:bsoil infornration, logs of 6 exPloratory
notes aritted il January, I98I for a proposed develogrent directly rrcrth
of sardstone nrive were revis^red. ltrree of tlre holes r"ere drilled
wittrin about 50 feet of tlre roadr,ray. Substrrface profiles en@untered at
these tples revealed a ccnrbjration-of sards, gr-rar,els ard cobbles fur a
silty to clayey rnatrix. lto free vtater was encountered to tlle Irtaxirmnn
aeptir Ariff.d,- 24 fe"t. Ttese 5 holes lrere subeguently ched<ed for
water derreloFent. Ible 1, located directly across It* !d 13, irdicated
no water to tlre present lole depth, 21.5 feet. On tlle upf,ritl side of
tt" rot near r,ions Ridge Lop, rdater was lrEasurd at depth lT 3/4 feL
belcrvr existilg grorrrd surface.
@nclusions ard Reccrnrendations: Based on tfte subsgrface orditions
les located on-site ard iJt t}re adjacent
roi ,psr"p", the obs;/ed uuiiairq distress does not appear to be associated
with hillside instabilitl . ltre subsoils consist predcrnirantly of nediun
dense to dense granular -soils r^trich trave relatively good slEar stre$gth
o
r^J
Vi-ctor l"lark Donaldson, Ardritect
l,lay 11, 1981
Paqe Ttrree
cf,acberistics. kesents of a regionally high grorrd r'rater table wh:idt
coul,d adversely effect hillside itaUifity does rpt apPgal to eldst'
Fegional b"dto"f. dip is gereral]y dol6r to ttre rprtJ- dtich lnuld enharce
tlle long term stability.
Based on our obssrrations ard l<ru^iledge of tie constnrlion, tl.e
distress aP[Ear^s to be related to localized settlerrent ard lateral wall
noverrent. -i
"cr,rUi:r.tictt
of t}re fo}lodng soil-related events rnay have
@ntrilcuted to ttE distress-
b<c-essi-ve r,ettjlg of tle subgrade at footilg l-evel esr:rred durirg
o<cavation in n.1a ]Iovgnber, 1981. the r,rettirg \€s aplErently t]e
result of sno,r r.relt arxl possiJcly scne natr:ral noisture. llo soft or
rret conditions l^ere reported on Iot 15.
Reportedly folloriIg stabilizaticn of tlre srirgrade o,n fot I.3,
,orrrt*.tiott of the for:ndatisr ard franing proceeded through t1e
wil.Iter. Precauticrrs to prevent freezilg of fourdation bearhg
*if" *"" apparently rroL taken. .edditic'nal r,etting of the subgnrade
frcrn srcnr nelt r,ray lnve occurred on botlt lots '
subseqr:ent backfiltilg to entry way level cansisted of a miJlirn-rn 14
rot oepth. of t}lis 14 feet, an apprco<inate 5 to I foot depth on
Iot 13 i''as above tie ori-ginal grade and about 4 to 6 feet \.,as above
origilal grade on Iot 15.
C
(1)
(2)
(3)
Design drarrdngs irdicate a 30 inch footing srrpports_ the uptdll
fourrdatjoi r^raU and a 58 jlch foti1g supports the cantilevered ends'
Allovrable bearing pressure was taken as 3,000 psf . Backfilting to
entry way level r'suld tane applied an additional 1750 psf Pressure at
i"r-h"ti* bearing leve1. tiris nragritude of surcharge applied o'er a large
area \€u]d have a sj.gnificantly greater effect on settle$ent than the
narrow wa]l footiagsl If ice ferrses had forned and subsegr:ently tlawed,
potenlial. settlsrEnt ttculd be increased. Additional loading frun
tonstruetion equiE[Ent rnay also ha're adversely effected the structure'
@nsidering the assuned grranular subgrade, novenent_should stabilize
relatirrcly rapid.ly ard replacorent of t}e backfill sbould rDt cause an
additional large anor:nt oi settLsnent. Ib facilitate resistance of
iit&af 1oad.s,-dea&rran constgrction can be used. Ttre dea&nan stpuld be
positioned beyord an imaqirarT tine exterding rryrard frcrn_tlp lo,"er'f;l||t levef on a 35o angle away frcnr t1.e r.rall ard buded into naturar
gr""d.t subsoils. tle estjrnate I distuttce of about 20 feet and a dept}
5i S f."t will be reErirea. Ttre dea&na' can be sized utiliz1ng a
pa.ssive ""rtbr pret",rre of 400 psf per fmt of depth' A gafety factor
"t le""t 2 stpuld be taken. ttre a-e.Att"" shoul-d be poured rreat il1 tle
er<cavation ard backfill above tlre rrrits stould be ccnpacted to at least
95t of stardard Proctor density.
Backfill, against for:ndati.on walls can consist of on-site granular
soils free of naterial larger tllan 5 fulclles. sil]cte sore seepage was
^ILVictor Mark bnaldson, Arch-itect
May 11, 1981
Paqe Four
sr,P/jw
cc: Bob Hunnes
c/o Johnson' Voilard'
O'Dell Johnsqt
c/o KKBNA
o
errcrntered qtr IOt 13 during e:<cavation, rre reccrrnerd about the lcrrer
third of tte vrau baddilt crysist of wasfred rock onnested to t}e
rl.derdraij1 systsn. As dlesigned, t}e frurt corner frcLings at each Lnit
will bear o"r baclcfill llBterial arrl tler:e may be a hi$t risk of fotrdalicrr
settlsrent. Iro reduce this risk, tlp bad<filt should be ccntracted to at
Igrsg 95g of stardard Prrc<*or density adjacent the outside \{all ald the
footbgs sfrcr:-td inpose less than 1000 psf bearfutg Pressure. The
forndatisr rlal-ls slrould be braced dr:ring ccnpaction.
If you harre any qtestions or if r"e can be of furtfier sel:\rioe'
please calI.
Verlt trul' l.urst
cltEN AND AssmrjfrEs, rl.lc.
,*%,^/.4J,,4
Stevert L. Pawlak, P.E.
Arctluleta
F
tJ.
I
'f I ,l --'54
o norcJ
Lot l5
15
20
2S
30
s7/t2
llol e I
Lot l3
7/12
so/6
3r/rz
lvC= 6.8
200= 19
4016
29/6, So/9
l0
F
I
t.o(;s 0lj L.xPt.()ll.\T0RY tloLES
o
LtsGTIiD:
Fill, silty to clayey sand 6 gravel with cobbles, loose.
Gravel (SC-CC1 cobbles and scattered boulders in silty to clayey sand natrix,
nediun dense to dense, noist, nixed reddish bronn.
Siltstone bedrock, very hard, greyish green.
L Standard Penetration Test Sarnple. AST?.| 01586 The syrnbol 7/12 indi.caies that
I l0 blows of a 140 lb. harser ialfing 50 inches rere required to drive the
_f sampler 12 inches.
I Disturbed Bulk Sanple
E
w
E
-t
I lr"ti."r Rig Refusal.
lHlrnor."."s slotted pvc pipe installed to depth shown
NOTES:
(1) Test holes were drilled on llay I and S, l98l with a four inch
diameter continuous flight power auger.
(2) Surface elevation of holes nithin t I foot of.building entry Hay level.
(5) frio free water was encountered in the test holes at the time of drilling or
. when checked on lrlay 11, 1981.
(4) WC = Water Content ('r);
-200 = Percent Passing No. :00 Sieve.
'll,l.i5A LE6E\D G !{OTES Fig. 2
o26
z
(,6
*" and associates, in.f
u2
DIAMETEF OF PABTTCLE IN MTLLIMFTERS
CLAY IO SILT
GRAVEL 30
LIOUID LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
Silty sand
.111'L tl S?" 60 MtN te MrN . MrN t trrN 'iO ..0 '30
51 r. stLT AND CLAY 19
PLASTICITY INOEX
FROM
Lot 13, Test
q,
a
Hole I at 14 & 19 feet(combined
S IEVE ANALYSISHYDROMETEFI ANALYSIS
GO
?
z
(JE
o
.o2_
50G
r)
I
SANO
!l
& gravel.
21
45 60 MtN 19 MIN. t MIN T MIN
. CLAY TO SILT
'ro '50'.()'30 '16 'r0.'8
297 | 5$ rr0 438042 ?0
U S STANDARO
* SILT AND CLAY
PLASTICITY INDEX
HR
'
HR.
15 MlN.
=
z
uE
DTAMETER OF PARTICLE IN M'LLTMETERS
GRAVEL
Lrouro LIMIT
SAHPLE OF
SANO
rROM
GBADATION TEST RESULTSr: I , I3S,\
rl
ar. {--^U
JIM MCDONALD DUPLEXES| Lots 13 and 15,
Casolar, Vail-
J OHNSON.VOILAND_ARCHULETA, INC.
C t,n:rtlt tng Engitttrrs
W. L Johnron
Rob.rt H. Voll.nd
S. J. Archu lct!
David M. Houcteih€ll
Robort 8. Hunnea
H. Gsry Howell
F.ancor l. w6lli
FIELD OBSERVATION RECORD _-
Mark Donaldson -- Architect
rt,+,. 4-22-8Lf'
--*visited job site at 1I:30 A.M. with Mark Donaldson,
Webb, the General Contractor, and Billie, the Project
Superintendent.
Both duplexes nere fully framed and had recently been
backfilled along the north waII of the garages- I was
visiting the site at Mark Donaldsonts reguest because
of some reported probl.ems in the duplexes on Lot 13.
We walked through the dup1exes on Lot 15 and could find
no signs of distress anywhere in the buil-ding, either
in the concrete foundation structure or in the framing
above. I{ebb indicated that this foundation had been
backfilled on April 15' and due to the steepness of
the existing cut, much of the backfill had been placed
by dumping into the cut with a 955 front-end loader
and then the backfill was hand-compacted by workmen using
jumping jack compactors. This process of dumping and
hand-compacting was used up to an elevation approximately
4' below the garage slab. The uppglt! of backfi
plag the front-and then it r
fo
We then r.rent on to Lot 13 to look at the foundation and
frarning problems which had been. reported here. In this
building, we observed cracking in the following locations:
t. There r.rere several sizable cracks in the slab
on grade. f made a sketch of these on the
floor plan to show the approximate size and
layout of the cracking pattern.
#
UEMEIi
'aou|-oaR, coLoRADo 80302 444-1951 *
aavaDA, coLoRADo s0m2 42o 2055
2305 caNYoN aoLJ LE vaRo
53a5 w€ST 52{D AVENUE
o
Field Observ'htion Record
Jim lt4cDonald Duplexes, Lots 13 & 15
Page Two
o
2. There was a 3/16" wide crack in the top of the 10"
foundation wall at the northwest corner of t.he west
stai r,
3. There'were several very tight hairline cracks
running diagonally in the north wa]l near the
east end of the building.
4. At the northwest corner of the east stair, the' top of the foundation wall had broken off at the
corner, and a 1" separation was visible between
the edge TJI and the face of the concrete wa1l.
The separation tends to indicate that the floor
slab of the garage has racked toward the west
approximately I".
5. The top of the concrete foundation wall at the
northeast corner of the building has a crack on
the north face similar to that mentioned in item
no. 1 above, but this crack is much tighter' being
approximately 1/16" in width.
6. The garage floor slab has a large crack running
north-south all along the east end of the garage
for a length of about 7-8 feet where the slab is
tied into the basement wa1l. This crack is vrider
at the north end than at the south end' indicating
that it is caused by a bending type of stress.
7. Two diagonal hairline cracks were observed in the
garage floor slab in the east garage. The size and
shape of these cracks also j-ndicate that this floor
slab has undergone sorne bending stresses in the- horizontal direction.
8. The garage floor slab has separated vertically
from the top of the concrete foundation wal1
approximately 5,/8" at the west side of the building' and L/4" aL the east side of the building.
The size, shape, location and pattern of the cracking
in the building on Lot 13 leads me to believe that the
concrete wall at the northeast corner of the west stair has
settled vertically and translated horizonte-lIy_ toyards the
:orfg[ - rn lny o@nt and movement rd-as
Eused by a eombination of two things:
o
Field Observation Record
Jim McDonald Duplexes, Lots 13 a 15
Page Three
o
l_.During excavation, underground se rently
orscoverect n ng
nd s may hav€__sggsed some soft soil to occ
somewheJe-5dlo\^r the footinq leve.
2.In t_was backfilted with a Cat 955 front-end
oader which umped t!e_ f il]ewanorth waII
i ldin tratioenera te ressures ra
].n excess of those recommended b the soils re
On April 20, when I was first informed that there vrere
cracks in the foundation wall, the contractor felt that
the wall was sti1l moving. At that time, I recommended
to Mark Donal-dson that approximately L/2 of the backfill
be removed from the north wall using a backhoe so that
the machine did not have to get adjacent to the wall.
The backhoe arrived today and had removed approximately
5r of soil at the time of my visit- At my reconmendation,
the contractor had epoxied some smal1 pieces of glass
across several of the cracks of the building in order to
see if the building was continuing to move. As of today,
a few of these pieces had cracked, but there was no
particularly conclusive pattern to the cracking which
would indicate whether or not the bui1ding was continuing
to move. Several new pieces of glass had been epoxied
over cracks yesterday and they did not exhibit any further
movement as of today. The contractor had shot levels at
several points on the basement slab, and these seem to
indicate that portions of the slab may have heaved in the
order of L/2". I recommended that the contractor check
the north wa1l and the north-south shear walls for level
using ah instrument and establish some bench marks which
could be rechecked at a future time. He agreed to do this.
We discussed several alternativi:s to repair the movement
of the north wall. In my opinion, no matter which
alternative is selected, the backfill should be removed
from the north wall in order to relieve the pressure
against this walI. The alternatives for repair are as
follows:
oo
Field OU"u.,r.tion Record
Jim McDonald Duplexesr Lots 13 a 15
Page Four
1.A series of steel tie-backs could be anchored to
concrete dead men located approximately 25-30 feet
north of the north wa11 of the building. rt is
possiiile, though not certain, that these tie-backs
could be gradually tightened to try and puIl the
north wall back toward a plumb position. -Even if
it were not feasible to pull the waII back' the
tie-back sy$tem would effecti.vely stop any further
southward movement of the slab and the north waIl.
This sol-ution is probably the least costly, least
visibLe, and most effectiwe system for holding the
wal-l.
A series of cast-in-p1ace concrete counterforts
could be installed on the north side of the wall
to hoLd the wa}I in position. while this alternative
is technically feasible, it would be very expensive
and it would not afford any opportunity to try anc
pull the wall back into Plumb.
Concrete counterforts could be installed on new
footings inside the basement. I would expect that
this scheme would be fairly costly, and it would
certainly limit the use of the space inside the
basement to a large degrre.
Diagonal steel braces could be installed on new
footings inside the basement to Prop the inside of
the north waII against further movement. This scheme
would also limit the use of the basement space.
At this time, the cracking in the sl-ab-on-grade is not
severe enough to warrant removal of the s1ab. ft is
likely .that this slab cracking could be covered with
either a carpet system or a 2" cast-in-place concrele
loppinq. The architect' contractor, superintendent,
Ena f aiscussed all of these aLternatives and decided
to wait for the owner to have an oPPortunity to appraise
the situation and give direction on how to proceed.
Webb agreed to continue to vtatch the building and let
us know if movement is still occurring-
2.
4.
[.\
a
DATE 12-1-80 PROJECT NO.-
:I
hm
atr
T
m
m
m
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
trtment of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
i TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I ll lll lv
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B E H (yM
DIVISION , Z 2"fu
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK .
New Duplex
PERMIT NO.
z
tr
l)
BUITDING 225.000
ELECTRICAL 8-500
PLUMBING l0 -onn
MECHANICAL 3,000
TYPE GROUP SO- FT. VALUATION PERMIT FEES
V R-3 3380 2?q.o|J.o.BUILDING PERMIT 745.50
PLAN CHECK 372.75
ELECTRICAL 53.00
PLUMBING 100.00
MECHANICAL 30 .00lrew(Xr arrrnarroN( ) ADDtTtoNAL( ) REPAIR( )
DWELLING UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS-
G,R.F.A-
-EEDROOMS -COMMERCIAL SYSI
-RESTAURANT
SEATING
-HEIGHT IN FT.
-
BATHTUB/SHOWER
NO FIREPLACES
-NO.
TOILETS
COVERED PARKING
-UNCOVERED
PARKING
-
RECREATION FEE 507 .00
DESIGN REVIEW BOARO 100.00
CLE.AN.UP DEPOSIT (ffi;; )
rqtAl PERMTTIFES [2.108.25 ,/
INSULATION
N|NG ADMTNTSTRAToR , UATF
-./L \
FLOOR
EXT. WALLS
ROOF
TYPE TH ICKN ESS R VALUE ZONINGNoTES:#
Batt 6rl 10
ll 6"19 ------S: li:- r,.\\\
tl 10"38 \r__1
H EAT -,,f 6t f^ r'//e4,6,^
I HERt-trl ;\cKN()\'l.ED(;t 'rllAT I l{,\\'E
RllAl, TlllS APPl,l{iATll)r" AND STAI E Tllr\ r 'l llt:
AB(lV!: lS C()Rl(l:(il AND AGRtr: l() (:OllPl,Y
wtTIt t,r, T()wll ()ltDlNANcEs A:! t)
'II,DIN(]N S'1
s t 'l-l'
ELEC: X I CES.
SOLAR IWOOD:
VAIL WATER & SAN DIST. TAP FEE
SPEC IAL NOTES:
LOT 13 BL
FtLtNG Casolar Vail II
LEGAL
JoB NAME: McDonald Duplex
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
OWNER
MAIL ADORESS
CITY PH.
ARCHITECT
rrnrr,r Great Divide Const-
MAIL ADDRESS
GEN ERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
LECTRICAL
ONTRACTOR
MAIL ADDRESSPL UM B ING
CONTRACTOR
Iu AII ADDRTSS
M ECHANICA
CONIRACTOR
\,tAIL ADD RESS
OTHER
CONTRACTO
th6 prinlery/vall
ru
oo
chen and
CONSULT
associates, inc.
ING ENGINEERS ffi
SOIL & FOUNDATION
ENGINEERING
5080 BD. 154 . GLENWOOD SPRTNGS,COLORADO 81501 o 303/945-7458
Novsnber 25, 1980
Subject: b<carration Observation,
Proposed Residence, Lot 13'
Casolar vail II, VaiI, Colorado.
Job llo. 2L'135A
Great Divide Cons truc t ion
P.O. Box 2674
Vail, Colorado 8f657
Athr: 1,1r. Tfrcrnas l,iebbe.r
Centlgnen:
As requested, l.e met witl you on Novsriber 18, 1980 to observed tle
subgrade corditions oposed jn the excavatigr. We previously corducted
a soil ard foundation jrrvestigation at tte site, reported urder Job No-
2L,L35, dated October 8, 1980.
The excavation was near design foothg
visit. We wderstard tlnt seepage frcrn the
nraterial appeared to consist of rer^orked on-site silts-
the frozerr, disturbed soils encountered at
extent excavation stpuld be zed to prevent urdendnirq of
grade at the time of our site
deeper uphiIl cut face recently
began follcnring srpvr-nelt nrnoff. fh.
witnin tle northwest'portion ol the_o<Savat4-but very IitLIe free starding
area tal frozen- Ttre frozen
the
toadjacent residence. A perinreter fourdation drain stpuld be j.;rstalled
der,.,rater tlre e:<cavation ard protect t}re Lq,er Ieve1 agiinst vetting-
Ttregravelbacl<fill should octerd several feet in elevatiqr above the
An auxiliary drain pipe placed high
to intercept seePage.
Otlrer rec.qrnerdations presented iI the origilal reporL vihich are
acplicable strould also be observed.
any questions or if r,e can be of firrther se:rrice, please call'
Sincerely,
GIEN AND ASSOCTATES, rlc-
fourdation
into intercept potenti,al seepage.
the bad<fill could also be used
Steven L.
COIORAOO / CASPER, TIYYOMING /
o
chen and associates,,
o
r nc.
Subiect: E<cavatiott Obser'ration, Proposed
Resi-dence, Iot 13, Casolar, Vail
II , Vail, Colorado.
Job llo. 21,135A
you on Novqnber 6. 1980 to observe the sub-
&cavation. We previously corducted a soil
ttre site, reporLed to you wder Job }qo- 21,135'
At the tjme of or:r site visit, t}re e:<cavation \,tas near footirg grade with-
in the deeper front portion of the lot and daylighted Lo- the soutl. The o<cav- -
.U* f,ra not. been f-irnl graded, The soils exposed in tlle excanration consisted .
of si1t1z to clayey sards irC Aravels_witlr-i.n the deep sut area transitioning to
;h-;f: sandv silis. and qranuiar fill towards ttre south' The fill n'aterial a4natfra1 sandY ts,ana grantiar fill towards ttre south' The f:]L9!95!gl-$
SOt L & FOUNOANON
ENGINEERING
SUITE C-7 VILLAGE PLAZA 'GLENWOOD SPRINGs, COLORADO 81601 o 303/945'7458
Noveru:er f0' 1980
Great Divide Constiructl'on
P-O- tsox 2574
Vail, Colorado 81657
Attrr: Irlr. Ttrcrnas I'Jebber
GentlgTen:
As requested, ve met with
crrade corditions exlrcsed jrr the
ird fo*nttion irrvestigation at
datcd October 8, 1980.
silts were a tivelv hiqh noisture cordition
',vitldn the excavation area are suitable ior ttte
e)<cava should be agail when
reccrflnenoac]-ons presented in ttre original report v*tich are
also be observed.
anv questions or if we can be of firrther service, please call-
Sincerely,
cIE\t AliD ASSOCTAIES, nic.
SIP/rIaf
@ z Jolrrson/Voilard/Archuleta
Attrr: tr4r. Bob Alson
The subsoil conditions exposed irr tle excavati-on are sjrnilar to tlat
errcr.mtered during the original irvesligaulol -4 srritgblg=for sYeEg. * of ,!E
irnl graded-
applicable slpuld
If you have
OFFTC€S OENV€R COLONADO / COLORAOOSPNINGS COLORADO / CASPER'WYOMING / SALTLAXECITY'
-rrr
-
TOr
MEI"IORANDUM
PLANNlNG AND ENVIRONIVIENTAL COMMISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COM},IUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: 10 /23/80
RE:sid.e setback variance request for Jim wlcDonald to move the building
envelope on site 15, Casolar Vail II
qEECRTPTION OF VARIANCE
The reguest is to encroach 5' into a 15' side setback. There is a 10'
utility easement-""""iitoting the remainder of the setback' The reason
fnr rha rpcrrlelr-t- is to *o.r" aiuy from the adjacent duplex to the east'
The ext:erior clecks of -uhe two building's, wilhout the veriance, lroul'd be
5 feet aPart, due to the proxj.mity of the building envelopes' .Thus' the
i"qu"ut is to alior,r ro,o. i'br"athi-ng rocm't ancl privacy between the sLructure:-:
CRITEP.TA AND FTNDINGS
Iqg-:-nil":-e!-"f -Cr:i-t-er-.1a ald-Fi-qdfnqs;,-- sr?-S.!lgl- #r,,!2 ' 060 of Lhe
Mgnrs.1pi:l-codc,, tf-;;A$;ffi--li:-ar-aAnrru;:!i'-linc -e$-ie*'ry€+1g
a-r>pr:ov;rl of the "*qr*;;'t-"a "qt]&qe-li-*"FtrFb"'-tEA fc>ry'''{jJql ft"tq
Consideration of Factor:s
As described. above, the building envelopes on this parcel are in close
pi""i-*ity to each other. A settlemenL iu.= t."*nLly reached with. regard
to the vriclth of the duplex to i:he easL, the dispuLe being over the actual
size of the decks vs vrhat the approved plaus showed- 'Ihe owner to t-he
east is cutti.ng back his decks 4' lo allow some room between the structures '
and this request i" t" move another 5' away. This allows some visual
lines through the d.e'sity on this lot and lids in the reduction of a fire
trazara betw6en the two dlcks. No structure wi-Il be built on the western
side.
rhe dec{ree to whiqF relie{ -fr:9m thq, glt-ilt, ?'= 1119!?fj+!+f+9+*19-!"and entorcement cF a s@ necessa-{y* po asllevg.-qglL
nufi:w ";a r.n -+c vlgilitY, of
to attain Lhe obicclives this tj tT6 *itho"t
is the insufficient distance
variance i s harmlcss and isWe feel the
structures
ment.
physical hardshiP here
and the granting of the
between
an improve-
The ef f ect of the :r:equeqted v+rialrce on liqht and air:, dist-'ri.bution of
oopulation, transportation "".i trt;;
[Eil j-uics , and publ ic: saf el:
There i.s a
l-ocation of
line needed
servei line 4'
the building
work in that
off Lhe ProPertYfounclati.on. It I
area Lhere could
li.ne, 6' from Lhe ProPoseds possible that, if tire sewer
be problems with the location
llcDonald -2-Lo/2)t
of the! house. In the event the locai:ion of the
due to the granting of this variance, the owner
responsible for solving the problem.
foundation became a problem
of the house would be
Such other factors and criteria as the
the proposed variance.
None exist
commlssaon qeems licable to
FINDING9:-
The P1a-nning and Environmental Comm.ission shal1 make the following
findings before granting a variance:
That the granting of t.he variance will not.consLitute a grant of special
privj.lege inconsistent vrith the limitaij-ons on other properties classified
in the sarne disf:rict"
That the granting of the variance will not be cletrimental to the publ.ic
h-.-1+l- -.- F^t--,rrL:.-.r.(.rrr D{1.r.Er-y, iir welfare' or materia..l-l-y injul ious to propercies or
'i mnr. ."':',"i..,r, F c i r.. l-i'r. rr.i r'.i n i 4-rrJlri!/Il,/v\:.lr-Ilt-J .LlJ Lt.i(; vi.\?IrrJ-LJ.
ThaL the vari ance is warranted for one or rnore of the fo-i-lowing reasons:
The strict or literal interpretaLion and enforcement of the npecified
regulation would reslllt in practical- difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent wit:h the objectj-ves of titis titl-e.
RE.COMI'INNDATiON
The Department of Corp$unity Development feels there is a harCship involved
in this case, and that the granting of t-he variance has a posi.tive effect
upon fire safety, privacy of the homes, and sight lines between t-he
buildings relieving the dense feeling one gets vrhen vier+ing the Iot.
Thus, r"re reconunen.d approval with the fotlowing conditions:
If, becau-se of the granting of this var:iance, problems occur with future
sewel: line work in the easement, the ol.iner of the structure on envelope
15 would. be responsible for solving the problem in a mutually satisfactory
manner.
ir+ _ \-,,
--...-J- -
-'L-
-..-
SOI L & FOUNDATION
ENGINEEBING
SUITE C-7 VILLAGE PLAZA . GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 ' 303/945'7458
SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED RESIDENCE, tOT 13
CASOLAR' VAIL II'
VAIL' COLORADO
PrePared for:
Victor Mark Donaldson, Architect
1000 Lions Ridge tooP
Vail Run
VaiI' CO 81657
Job. No. 21 ,135 October 8 ' 1980
I
l
I
TABLE OF'MfiENIS
cc{cLUSrcl{s
SCOPE
SIIE CO{DITICNS
SUBSOIL CCft{DITICF{S
FCI,]NDATICN RECO.IMENDATIO{S
FIMR SI.ABS
UNDMDRAiN SYSTET.{
SIJRFACE DRAI}IAGE
MISCEII.ANECIJS
FIqJRE 1 - TOCATIG{ OF E(PTORAIIOFS PIT
FIGIjRE 2 - @AHrC lff, LmEID Al.lD l.Ioms
FIE RE 3 - S?{EX,LSTSOLIDHTTOiI TEST RESI]LTS
t
.l
o
CU\ICLUSIO{S
The proposed residence can be founded with ryreadfotings placed on the up4>er natural soils with
design details and precautions as discussed below.
SCOPE
this report presents the results of a soil and forrrdation ilves-
tigation for the proposed dr:p1ex to be located cn 1ot 13' Casolar'
Vail If, Vail, Colorado. The report presents the reormended type
foundation ard allo^rable pressures, general subsoil conditions
together with cther soil related design and cnnstruction details.
SIIE CCI{DIfiOIS
At the tine of the field investigation, the site was vacant and
overed with grass and r+eeds. the ground surfae is sonrewhd irreg-
ular and generally slopes dor^'n to the south-southeast with ryroxi-
matety 12' of elevation differential. across tlre blilding envel-ope.
During a previous investigaticn on adjacent lot 14' t@-lso
indicated to have been filled. l'taximrm fill depth logged durirg this
investigation consisted of about 6 feet qr tlre &vmhill side. A por-
tion of the lot atrpeared to have been graded witl shall fill.
SUBSOIL OO{DITICIIS
The subsoil conditiorrs rrere investigated blr excavating 1 test pit
within the central porticn of tlre b'rildirry area as sLrcnm on Figure 1.
fhe graphie )og of the subsoils sroountered at the test pit is sttolvn
o
I
-2-
on Figure 2. In general, the subsoils ocnsist of a onrbinaticn of
granular fill and nediun stiff sandy silts overlying a silty to clayey
sand,gravetandcobblemixeddepositbelcnaproximatedepth6feet.
Occasional boulders v,,ere a:Iso enocuntered in this 1or'uer layer ' Re-
sults of a crcnsolidation test perfornred or a sanpJ.e of the sandlz silt
inclicates a noderate to high conpressibility r4nn toading and wet-
tinS.
Moisture ocntent of the srbsoils was descibed as being roist and
no free water was enoounterd at tine of excavation to the nrax imr.un
depth investigated' -gj[gg!
FTIUNDATICN RECOFIMENDATICNS
I{e understand the duplex witl consist of a 2 story structure hav-
irrgawalkrcutbasenent.l,laxinr.rncutisanticipatedtobecntheor-
Construction will be nainly of vood frarne'
Considering the subsoil cqlditions enoountered at tte erplorato4r pit
and anticipated onstruction, r'e reonnend the use of q>read footings
olaced on tlre natural zubsoils fcr su;port of the structure. Tbe fol-
lcning design and construction details s|rould be observed:
( 1) Footings should be placed on the natu
ting fiu and topsoil and designed for a naxjrnn bearinq presstr'.e
If fotings ate extended do,n to bear entirely ang'
theoarsegranul.arsoilsranallowablebearingc'oacitvof3'000'
psf cdt be used. Initial settlenents durrrg oonstnrcticn slpuld
I
I
-3-
be relatively mi'nor (1/2 inch or lFts) a@r
[pvelrEntontheorderof3inchisindicatedifttresubsoils
were to becore uet ' Tbe greatest risk of differential novement
is for footings placed on the uSper silts'
?
(2) lrlinimusn footing width slrould be taken as ]-g--inches for walls and
,.tj' 2 feet for colurns'
(3) Fourdatiqr walls shouLd be reinforced top and bttom to *an an
unsut4Drted}engthofatleastl0feet.Basementrvallsactirgas
retainingstructuresshoulda.]-sobedesigredtoresistarregtriv-
alent lateral- earth pressure of 45 psf per fmt of depth' This
pressure assulles a well<onpacted giranular fill having a slrface
gradient sloped aw4g frcrn the structure'
(4) Alt topsoil, existing fill and any loca1 soft pockets of soil
forrndatt}rebaseoft}refotirrgexcavationsshculdbererrcveil
arrd the footirrgs extended down to the lower' firn soils'
(5) Perinreter fotings sbould be placed belop frost depth'
FIOOR SIABS
The rpper natural soils beLovr all topsoil and existinq fill are
suitable to su!ryort slabtnnrade construction' In the buildirg area'
allvegetatiqr,toPsoilandexistingfitlstroutdbererrcved.Required
backfill should consist of ncn"e:<pansi''e granul- or silty soils orr
pactd to at least 90t of stanilard Proctor density at' a noisture cpn-
tenL near optimn. Itre on-site soils shoutd be suitable fcr use as
t
I
-4-
backfill rnateriaf provided all organics ard oversized material are
renpved;riorLoplac€{rEnt'Tbreducetheeffectsofsonedifferen-
tial rroverrrent, -a11 slabs strould be separated fr.crn bearirg rembers wit}r
a positive expansion joint and aCeguately reinforced' A mj'nim:m 4 in-
ctr layer of free-draining oravel should be provided innediately be-
neath the floor slabs.
I,]NDMDRAIN SYSIE!'I
Although free water was rDt encountered at tire of exploratory
pit excavation, it has been our experience il areas such as this that
localized seeps crr perched water can develop at ti:tnps of r--L -ur'-'fr '
Therefore,thelq*erleveloreacirlevelexcavatedintotbehillside
should be protected by an underdrain system' lhe underdrain should
consist of a perforatd Pipe ernbedded il1 a gravel-filLed trench placed
atleastlfootbelowadjacentfloorslabqradeandslopedtos:itab}e
outlet.Thegravelbeneat}rt}eflorslabshoutdbecrcnnectedinto
t}e underdrain sYstern.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Thefollovlingdrainageprecautionsshor:ldbecbserveddr:ring<pn-
struction ard maintained at aII tines after tl.re britdirg has been com-
pleted:
(1)Excessiver.'ettirrgorfryingoft}refoundatiqrexcavationsbould
be avoided durirg construction'
\.
o
-5-
t'tiscellaneor:s bacicfill arourd brrildings should be ncistened and
oonpacted to at least 95t standard ProcLor density-
the grourd surfacre surroundirrg tlre buildirtg sLrould be sloped to
drain auray in all directions. lde reconmend a minfurn-rn slope of 6
inches in the first 10 feet.
Rmf downstrnuts and ftains should discharge r"e1l beyond t]]e IiIIF
its of all bad<fil].
l'{ISCELLANECIJS
this report has been prepared in accordance with generaIly aceep-
ted soit and foundation engineerirg practices in this area fcr tle use
by tJre client for design trtrposes. Ttre <onclusions and recormenda-
tions submitted in this report ar:e based upon tlre data obtaired frcrn
the exploratorly pit excavated at the location slrcrr,rn ql the exploratory
pit p1an. The nature ard extent of variatiors across the site may not
becqne evident untiL excavatiqr is perforned. If during cDnstruction'
subsoil conditions aFPear to be different flsn tlrose described bereinr
this office slpuld be advised at ollc€ so tlrat r.e-evaLuatiqt of the
reornendations rnay be nade. I& reconnerd cn-s ite observaticn of ex-
cavatiqts and fioundation bearing sitrata ty a soil enqineer'
CHEN AND ASSOCIATES' INC.
o
(2)
(3)
(4)
hn #2fu,1--
Steven L. Pawlak' P.E.
I I
02?00 Earthr,ork
t.
2.
Clear{nq-- All areas under bullding and to a polnt l0'0'beyond
sarc, walks, and driveways to be stripped to a polnt below the
or3anic silty c'lay topsoll. Stock plle all such earth for use
as top soil in the finishlng grad{ng. Extrem ctr€ ls to be
exercised ln the preservatlon of existlng conditlons and neigh-boring property. This includes all trees, ponds ond othernatural elements.
Excavation - The excavations for foundations shall be large enoughf permit-forming both sides. Bottoms of all footings'muit Ueievel and cJeared of loose naterials. Leave a'l'l botloms open forinspection. No footings shall be poured until inspected ahd
approved !y tne Architect. All footlngs to bear a arinirrum of12" into bearing'strats. AII naterlali loosened or disturbed by
the excavation process to be removed from beneath foundation areasprior to pouring concrete. Dewater as necessary with drainagetile or pumping.
Fill and Backfill
A. Backfill materials at up-slope foundatlon and retained wallsshaii be granular materlal wlth stones no 'larger than 6oin diametir. Salvaged granu'lar materlal from-the foundaHon
excavations may be used for thls purpose, if processed to
remove the stones larger that 6".
Granular backfill behipd foundatlon ual'ls shall be llghtly
compacted to between 051 and 751 of relotive dry density for
cohesion'less free drafnlng solls. Over compaction wlll-be
avoi ded.
Backfill in utility trenches and 'locations other than behlnd
foundation or retaining walls nay conslst of cormon fi'llmaterial compacted to 921 of standard Prdctor denslty andwithin 21 of optimun moisture content as per ASTl.l 0-698.
B. D9 not proceed with backfilllng until walls are adequately
shored or braced. Prepare ground surface to receive f{ll by
removing vegetation, debrls, frozen rnaterlal or other un-satisfactory noterial. Scarlfy as requlred so that flll
nateria'l wilj bond with exlstlng surface. Place flll naterlalsin 'layers not rnore than 8" ln loose depth, conpactlng erch' layer to 951 maximum denslty. Do not p'lace materlals on
surfaces that are muddy, frozen, or that contaln lce or frost.
4. Gradinq - The Corltractor shall provlde rll rough grades and flnfsh
grades as shovrn. A1l ditclres and ruts are to be eradlcated. The
slope away.from the buildings shall ba not less thcn I to 10. Flll,
as required to bring the area up to flnfsh gradc, rEy be cornnn flllplaced as specified above. Rembve all erceis naterlals fron th€ slte.
2
'{
_,__a
'' 1i' i, , i.,,t.-a,i. . ..f,,,.
- 5. Rock Exqavatlon - A't'l ercavatlon requircd In connectfon rlth
cofitruc-ffi'n'under thls contract l3 pnisured to belcomron €rctyE-
t{0n,..|.e.. earth and other uaterlalr-that.crn be remved xlth+ l{ll;ii'.ffiffi,:l}'l,fiilliiH;ifill:fli'lil.liulilli3[:';, 11.,,,*
for on the p'lans and Inthe'ipeclf.fcatlons, thelContrrctor shrll
irrrediateiy-stoprvorkandnotifytheArch|tect,and;thro*ner,and
shall not lrocebO further untfl-agreemnt ls'reached.and rpasure- r
gpnts n'6de for the Durpose cif establlshlnE the volurre of rock
required to be excavatbd and the cost'of iuch excavatlon.' Rock
ls'deflned as any stone, concretir.boulder, or'ces*ntltlous
materJal greater than one'cirblc yairl'ln:volurn.that, Clnnot ba
renroved b! power equipment vltho-ut-the use of contliuous drllllng
and exptolfves., - .': ', 'i. .l;..r rj;*U:i:*-l:;;*b.Y1.i!,1 ' :' ' 1.,''.-, ,... : .. .'-id;"!. , rr;-,i.''-rE ,ll ..*' l t'
6. Footinq Drifn - At port{on-of butidlnri'birloetei. shorm on thc,'ffifigs,lnntall pblyvinyl chlorlde (pilC) aratn, t!le,pltchlng srrc
]"/'10 ft. to otttfall.- oriln tlle to bc ninufactLr{d by Advanccd:
Drilnage Systems (or approved equal), gpsh coveredi:{];-- i:
dlomtEr.. - -, ' -::-J i:, I . .."- F-.r. t]-,lfF.:{;. Ft:. -' . !''. !-
Jolnts to be uuitea tod"in.i Ji;i rii.'i;ii t{t*i ir'ii-in..,oo' Jorn,.
Surround sare.r+f th s/{]. gr31e-! as-. showil-oii.p.i*i1!1.,.-'*,_,- "H i' l''.'ft$;i,r'i' ' : fiti;il' :;'
.. The last l0'0o of lensth at the-outfilil'shall be cigt-iron i{ttr ttte
end of sanc set ln concrete splllxay l8'wlde,35'.'.lon0t'4" thlcl.
(Unless,otheruise noted on.Dralrings.[ '+. 'oi-"1',... .
t'
l*; H'i*'.; "l:l"Iffi'ff :',i[:'i tia''a tert at' tra s!t'r.o;l:,'.1'*
'' l
02600 Pavlnq and Surfaclnq
l. PrepardtJon - Coordlnate the preparatlon of the subgrrde-l.ncludln9.
tn^necessary cutting, ffllln!1, tompactfng to lnsurl r 92t stlndard
Proctor-density of the subgrode. .r :
llhere fil.l ls required to brlng the grade to lts proper e'levatlon,
furnish and p'lacd crushed rocl-basa 6' thlck conslstlng of rord
base naterlris compacted to.gSt.standard Proctor 011sJ!f;
At a tlnre, approximately 24 hours prlor'to the laylng'of asphalt
concrete, thb-Contractoi shall appiy to the entlrt tF! to b9 paved
HC-l llquld asphalt prinfng guteiir'l .rt a rate of no! lcss than
0.3 galions per square yari. Thls pr{m coat shall .bc rppllcd. -.unlf6rmly ani only wtrerithe Sase Coi.rrst surface ls dry or slfghtly
?.
damp.
Asphait Coicrete - The Controctor shrll placc a hot hld' pltnt
rnfxEd, aspEfoncrete nat, hro Inchel Lougacted. thlclness.
Asphalt concrete nlxture shrll br prtprrcd vltl thr. folloulng'
spec{fled naterlals: ,... ': . .
=1.
,i'
A. llineral Aggregate: Shall conslrt of. crushed roct cocposed of hrrd
-.#F.
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DATE 1-7-81 PROJECT NO.-
of community development
[' tt Bdd
hrtn
TYPE OF PERMIT
D autorrlc X pruMatNc
B ElecrRrcnr I FouNDAnoN oNLY
I MECHANICAL T
1, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV
2, OCCU PANCY G ROUP AEEHI
DlvlsloN t z za@
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
New Duplex
PERMIT NO.
z
tr
f
BUILDING 285 .000
EL ECTRICAL 8.500
PLUMBING 10.000
MECHANICAL 3 0n0
TYPE GROUP SQ. FT, VALUATION PERMIT FEES
V R-3 3380 22q noo BUILDING PERMIT 895.50
PLAN CHECK 447 .75
E LECTRICAL R3 nO
PLUMBING 100.00
MECHANICAL 30.00NEW(X) ALTERATION () ADDITIONALO REPAIR O
DWELLING UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
c.R.F.A. 3-380-eeoRoots
COMMERCIAL SYST
-
RESTAURANT SEATING
HEIGHT IN FT. -- BATHTUE/SHOWER
NO FIREPLACES
-NO.
TOILETS
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCOVERED PARKING
RECREATION FEE 507 - 00
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1o0.00
CLEAN.UP DEPOSIT ( zoo.oo '
TO"TAL PERMTtfEES ',tiat.zs', ,/'{fuffi% ,He
INSULATION
!ING ADMIN ISTRATOR
FTOOR
EXT, WALLS
ROOF
TYPE THICKNESS R.VALU E
\ING NOTES:
Batt 6 19
Batt 6
Batt 10 38
HEAI'fno/t e&4.- ry,6 :,*t^ furtn"t/
'F.Rr-br n, orrro/nrr,,rr.. rH^,r I lrA\.r.
RI]AtI THIS APPI,ICATII)\ AND STAl'E TII.'1'I TII!]
Aa{tvU lS COITI(t'C'I ND AGREII 'I(} (rO}1Fl,Y
wlTlt At.t. TowN ()RDIN,1:'JCES ,1ll) Sa'\lt;
ELEC: I GAS:
soLAR lwooD:
VAIL WATER & SAN. OIST IAP FEE
SPEC IAL NOTES:
LoT 15 BL
FrLrNc Caso'lar Vai'l I I
JOBNAME: McDonald Duplex
OWNER
tu
CITY PH,
ARCHITECT
rrnu Great Divide Const.
MAIL ADDRESS
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
LECTRICAL
NTRACTOR
F IRM
MAIL ADDRESSPLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
FIP[,/|
MAII ADDR ESS
MECHANI
CONTRACTO
OTHE R
CONTRACTO
MAIL At]DRESS
LJi_-rTl
el
-e
o
l-r ft-< :t-: o
=lolno
l-o .)
t;3l-3| -"1 C
-;
o
o
3
(D.oz
U'
-{ncoJoz
Tmn
=-{
-mo=r.-
;=Y'7=Z
=!/rJ./;P-
_ .]I || i!lL ll l
Or-
z<om
>,=
=Oz
zt-
t-1
m
(-
m
I
z.
m
:
zo
oo
= --r>;
moI
z
o
ooz--l
()
o
C)
Zt-
I<
--1 z
-mc)--l
o
l-
oz--ln
-{on
o^zr)
nz>m
--r >
c)-
=m
--l
o
€zm z
m
rmo
r
_Tl
t-z
oo,
l<l>l-
lc
ln
l<t>
;a
lnlm
l*
l<
l>
l3
I
l< lnl:lrrl<|>Ilo|al
I'lltI
ltri
-o
.)t
z
-t
z
€
--l
m
)J
z
o
-l
mm
m
tTlo
Tfl.x --ro€x'n>;
z
<J'ct-
i
z
oomOat
=-6=;'i*R= fi >F-OP2A
=XAr; ;nHz4<n9=z6(,o --r
qt>mC)
o=9<so<.4 O
=
2
c
4
CZTDTzo>tn.)ac4.?0)i
HTT;;attZ
a;
zzoo
zm€
--l
4
=z
o
=oz
!
-l-o
C
:1
z
c) r.J
;o-i
=-l,, x
4->L
nln
;; o .1-o<2
4Aa
!- A n
^<s=2A06 o'nzz
€on
cur
;o<
=
-o
m
c
>=85t:a>
a:- ?;li
> a>=
:^:":Er't^:!
' ir,..
-.- 2' t
V>..2;
'. 1t:r.=
1 a-
:- a'= /
Ol
=lol"nl-nt
0r
I
I
I
I
I
I
ol
;l
z
3l
ol
=lz
-.1
lldr
"l
I
I
I
I
9lll-l
I
I
I
2
z
--t
-l
--l
t-
m
:-r
mm
U)
(-)
m
7c
!
mToI
0m2oz
4
TN
fr€
4
4
I
z_n
m
.)I
o
r
-0
c
Ez
fi
m
c)--l
o
-a
z
Im
a)
@c
oza
-D
TN
=
mu
=_Tt
mm(,
VALUATION
moI
z
o
_o
t-c
@zo
mt-mo--l
c)
q,c
Iz
\)i
\)
b..
Ix
I
-)
ar.v
\o
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ess 1-7-81 PROJECT NO.-
pERMTT No. [' '' 6 d dI
department of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
mtr
D
D
mn
BUILDING
ETECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
I TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV
2 OCCUPANCYGROUP AEEHI
DlvlsloN
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
New Duolex
PERMIT FEESTYPE GROUP SQ, ET. VALUATIONLOT 15 BL
FILING CASOIAT VAiI II sUILDING PERMIT
BNAME: McDonald Duplex
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH
DWELLIT'IG UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UNI
G.R.F.A. I80-eeoRooirs
COMMERCIAL SYST
HETGHT IN FT,
NO FIREPLACES
COVERED PARKING
-
RESTAURANT SEATING
BATHTUB/SHOWER
NO. TOILETS
-
UNCOVERED PAR(ING
FIEIM
MAIL ADDRESS
^rrv PH
ARCHITECT
DESIGN REVTEW BOARD
rrnu Great Divide Const.
MAIt ADORESS
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
TOTAL PERMILIEES
ING AOMINISTRATORMAIL ADDRESS
NTRACTO
INSULATION
R.VAtUE
FIRM
MAILADDRESS .PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
E!8M
M AIL ADORESSMECHANICA
CONTRACTOR
OTHER
CONTRACTO
|rlLR!-ul ,t c x I t t rr t/r t x I t: I ltAl I ll \\'!
R t: Ir Ttl ls APPt,lcATltrN ANI) !lT ',l l- l ll \ I llll
Alr()v! ls ((tttfi!:(;1 ANr) AORt:f 'lrt (lllllrll'
$lllt At.l. TtIAN l)Rl)INAN( 15 \l'il' \l \|1'
MAIL ADDRESS
VAII- WATER & SAN. DIST TAP FEE .
SPEC IAL NOTES:
\- _:l
t il-'lt.r .jj' :, :i; '-"\'
;i l: i'r I I t;,' :), 1'!ijll;, l,:l t::i"')(.'t.:.irr l,li ;.i":\z"
:! .!t .- l\., \ r? /.t: !:,.. ltr <> t'-:'..
6 tt., i,)l ;i ^'- -)-'' r- l,'J ,i tl,; J rI.ll-li.l i, '
:
lI, l'n 1r - r
Cr r'- o-c(: t!7- 1:i (D r
cli:) ; I>' '-1 1J1[; '] tr) "' c,.=z ;l
C),-zl
.i
**'*il
i r r. '"..'lI I l;t c il :| | lr;i ii ill.l li' ti ij | :i I lrr li;llll!: e.9l
! | l:, !l:;1| | l.ic' ii;JII l-l :,;- c;it(Jil+lii';ii:.ill4rri? 91,,,
i Ic{ ji lliiqr lli I t.1' tli lj i ;: :; _llil\l ri ," -llllr$)b:;ilI l*l " s\R{| | $.-l .-l'\)l :p, lFl - li!| | ll l*| | | | lq
l_. "l_i._-L . ._ .-,--.-,.r ----;i,l;;;:,----i ,.
-r--r---r- - i- -'i i
l;,, |)li lli I,l?l:, lr;ll,i Ili:|"'l l::l I, l;ll;, li l,'l I
-lj:-l- l:'l I illlll.,,:llllll| | | | I :-I lltil:i
|-.N ksl fi
tsNI$Nt Ittlltt,.-'ttl||t,llllll,,I I I ttt\tltitt,,ttltlltlttl
.....!"-...1" r . |,l
l() r'lrn lrl
lt" t:l
lt' l'
1..,
l;: ir
lr;l
t*Nil\I
ll$1,,lt i:
lls l
li: I
JNI
l"--i:'-
h=\lil\ ltnrI'll
r--l
I\3
l* l'uil'
lxt l,l
F_'lt-t
NI:
H'lijpt'FI'.=:=:::l
.. 1
il:l
'it I
',1.l 'l'u
| 111
| -\l
| '-:I --l. . I rr
Tl-iii
dr\ rl
.lql
al
..-J
I
I
iJ; s,|$lt
NNilo il\
ii$N'NNIN,t I Nl\ lNta.*-'^"- , .-.*'-" "'o
,-tii--t "i^'f"-.
il_L 1_Di:ll I | |til llFrtll | | [+.'
,ll
-i I l;.1ll | | l\'jll I I b'
;: ii '--l-- l--T---,ll llN
rii llE'
--:: ::::.'-::.:---i.- ; -::: ::.= :;
iiiilll:lll
"l.l'i-llll'llll-l i il-l
nlNl[$Hl
r ll ir i{l?j
o2:lo()()i() () til () 'r1 :; i.;i. '.' rt :: '" i. t ifinl;"t'i: I'ul;|iii;IXIi:js, l'i 'r X i; |,ir I ir$r I| | | | lTt I(:i:-o))ir>'l;:,9ii;lti 8i?d'i::d:llit:;siii sii lr li
z :. :.i I() r) !:. 1-r !:(1 |||tli
I__l_ I.""|"...r . r_. I
iiiii.lli'i
ili i: li l. l;i i
llililrll.'llli'-,th-"it*i l-l
lll{ N Ni$l
lFL l: P l-vl
ilql lrlt lr l
() .
'/ lll
"ll r
,1, ,'(,..
()
't
'.r"
tll
D ti .
I.
1:' -* ,-._),'
C'(-",
":-
-^.t
ai(::
:i
\.._,
7:
.(;
'i fii| -r'| ,- -'
| ..- l| --:,
tlI '--i
.)t,
): !i
z
t/l('
-)r
ai
,I
"t'Ji
(,
;':.
2.
c):'
()
(,)
()
I
I
I
t
,,,1'i
I
I
I
I
I
!ll
;.il
I
I
I
I
I
i' :i > i,.r'. :: :f ):
n:_ - ::::
:r : ::. -: .l
:'l:-:'i
r: :. " -r r::l:..>i:,:i- :: .', ."1:: . -).-:ii i';:.
^ '.: ;, .. :,
l'? ] "i.. l::...,...'..
t' .: i
:-'.j..::
". ::. "
\
1)
alio
:?
/,
C)
:.)
2:.
'tl)
-r t-;;r|'
.t.'t\
(.)
-t
:()
"t'(,-t
c.)
(t
:<.< l
:.t''j-
a)..1llr
t,l:
,l
" Kf{gffA Df-----" zt-*Dy,
Consulling Engin€ers
7456 We3l Filth Avsnue
Donvsr Colo€do &226
303 23? 6050tsbx {5-{3?0 INOEVCO OVR
Milo S. Xelchum
E. V€mon Konlsl
(1923r970)
Michael H Ea,rert Princrpals
Dortavon O NEkel
Davd E Ausln Oon T Pvle
Donald C \beb€t
A. J. Fl!,sn Le.oy E Toble.
t19OE-1S64
John X Irghl Asso6i.le Prlncipalg
Chenes D. KEyes
Wtliam B O Neat Jamei Fl. Davis
Neil F. Dunbar C Jsmeg Er'chson
Fobert D Scsrrow
Howard B Brownrng
July 10, l98l
Mr. Jin !{cDonald
B.O. Box 1290
Eomestead, Florlda 33030
RE: McDonald Duplexes at ValI
Dear Jin :
Your cootractor has advlsed us by telephone that the back-
fill has been placed behlnd both of the duplex buildings and
that no slgnlficant movenent took place. Based on that ln-
forrnation, ne expect thaE aDy future movenent wlll be negllglble.
1f you have any further questloas ifl thts matterr please let
us kuow. /1 .a ,4*#&(".i^.ffi
=----'t-$,tiriif1,z
Principal
DEA/g$
!*ig +zst !;'ti!?-fr.h" C:ps;radi;;tr,,*N
I I
MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMfSS]ON
Monday, October 27 t LgB} 3:00 p.t'l,MNETING
MEMBERS PRESENT SfAFF PRESENT
Gerry l{hite
.fim Morgan
Dan Corcoran
Gaynor Miller
Ed Drager
John Perkins
Roger Tilkemeier
1. Dan Corcoran moved Lhat the minutes of thebe approved,, seconded by Ed Drager. rn favornot. yet. arrived).
2. Dan moved and Ed. seconded the appointmentmember to attend DRB meetings. In lavor, S-0.he would be the alternate.
Side Setback Variance
Jim RubinPeter Pattenlarry Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
COUNCIL IVIEMBER
Ron Todd.
meeting of October l-3,1-9305-0 {John and Roger had
of Roger Tilkemeier as
Gaynor l.tiller said
request for Jim McDonald to rnove the buildj-nqCasolar Vail II. :
variance be approved withof envelope 15 would be responsiblefuture sewer line work inof' this variance. Roger(Jim Morgan against and
Peter Patten'presented. the explanation of the memo mailed to the mem]:ers.
'Jim Rubin added that when the original Casolar subdivision was.presenteC,
it wasn't_contemplated that the decks would be so close togetlrei.Mark DonaLdson representing Jim !{cDonald expi,ained that th6 buiJ-dingenvelt:pes are ti.ght, and that the o'rrTner is witting to risk buirdingnear the utility line. Discussion followed about how best to makecertain that fut,ure owners would also be responsihle. A deed rqas felttg b-".inappropriate by Brian o'Reirly, wtro fllt that 4 recorded notj-ceof this variance would be more appropropriate.
I.ohn Perkins moved Lhat the side, setbackthe staff recconrmendati.on that the ownerfor solving any problems that occur withthe easement, and with a recorded noticethe
Dan
4.
motion, and the vote q/as 4-1 in favorand Ed abstaining.
GEFA VARIANCE for Casolar II - Deane L. Knox
were 19 units instead of 20.
seconi.ecl.
Deane
Jim Rubin explained the memo and some of the very complicated eventsthat-tranrpi{gq ove-r the.past .severar years, addi-ng t-hat the requestwas for a 2,447 sgftvariance.Deane Knox gave his point of view,- adctingthat in Phase I ther:e was.less density thin permitted, and that there
and Jirn flisagreed alout whcther or not.the Town had gdrr(r ir1rn {r.lsagreeo afi)ut. wncther or not'the Town had given directi_onon the amounts of GRFA. Also in disagreement was Lhe vacation of 1vacation of lotlines, whether or not Knox approved some of the duplexes, how awareof ttre restrictions Knox r,,ras, etc. The appricant asked to have thisreguest tabled, and it was tabled by the pEC..
PEC - 2 LA/T1/BA
5. +mggAlpnts-t"o zonjnq-or -c11gr-.!L-slg .Wate:r QualitL
,]im Rubin suggestcd. thilt Section II. Hillside Development puidelines.
be removed from consideration, that it vras bet-ter a<ldressed in Desigtr
Review Guidelines and Lhat the Design Review Section vrould be rewritten
in the upcoming months to j.nclude tbe hillside regulations among other
changes
Density Contro] B. (fast page). Discussion of this section included
remarks by Stuart Brown, Scott Bdwards, Mason 'Ihomas/ Dean Canada,
Stuart llollander, Jim DeMartin, Mr. Caroselli, l"Irs, Thomas and Frank
McKibben, all of whom objected to it.
--.
-
Using the
September
SNCTION I.
SECTTON IT.
Approved. rvith
be changed to
"Proposed Changes to thc Torr.n of Vail zoning Ordinance" dated
25, 1980, the members d,ecided thab:
HEIGHT reeeived unanimous. approval .
HIj,LSIDE DEVELOPMENT GUIDDI,INES;
It vra.s decided to use the exj-stjrrg l.Iazard,o::dinance, but change
slope in the $pecial Restriction Secti-on from 403 to 308.
SECTION 1II. GROSS RESIDENTIAT FLOOR.]\REA - hlBI,J DEF],IIITION
Approved. as proFosed. with 6'6" head room rathcr than legaL headroom,
anO inctuaing affowing 25 sg ft aj-r lock {not incluoing it in GRFA}.
SECTION IV.OTHER CI.IANGES TO ZONE DISTRICTS JNVOLVING PER!{ITTED AND
CONDITIONAT USES
Unanj:nous approval .
sEcTrON V. WATER QUAtlTy RECOT'II{ENDATIONS
following changes: C.?,a. and
2 acres. and paragraph D. B. 7.
C.B.c. 5 acres shall
is removed,
SECTION IV.APPE]\L PROCEDURES
Unanimous approval-
SEETION VTI A CITANGES TO DENSTTY CONTROI
The vote to approve the revised GFRA factor as proposed was taken.,fohn Perkins had left, just before the rzote. The vote was 3-3 withGerry. Jirn and Gaynor voting against the proposal, while.Ed, Dan andItoger voted for.
NEIT
SDCTION VIT Bb.rli ot ttrc pEC
Option C.
Thc PEC was presented r,rjth 4 opt-ions (sce next page) .
menrbers voted for Option B, with Ed Drager favoring
B.
D. Proposed. in Handout with Changes
I. Same as A, except that 408 slope areas, 100 year flood plainareasr and high hazard avalanche areas would only have a soareduction in calculating all-owable GRFA,
vuu-3-trJ-?7*Bo
OPTIONS for Section
A. Proposed in Handou!
1. Elirninate 408 slope, high hazard aval.anche, and 100 year flood-plain from affected rots before ealculating GRFA in single Familyand Two Family Zone Districts
2. Lots vrith l-ess than 81000 square feet of buildable Lot areatb be allowed 21000 square feet of GRFA.
3. Allowed to build on 408 slope in accordance ri*ith special Re-strictions Section
O
vrr
B.
1. Parts of tots in single farniLy and two family zone districtsin 40? slope, high hazard avalanche, and tOO yeai flood plainare counted in calculating alloi.rable GRFA.
2. No development allor,red in 100 year flood plain or high hazardavalanche. Development alrowed on 408 slopes in accordance withSpecial Restrictions section.
C. Froposed in Hand.out with Chanqes
l. Same as A, except that maximum si-ze of a unit all-owed on alot affected by 40? srope, r00 year flood. plain or high hazardaval-anch is changed from 2,000 sguare feet to either 31500 or.4r000 square feet.
Existj"ng_in Current Zoninq Ordinance
*ffii1:
6. Amendmglts to Conditional Uqe Criterj.a oL Eoning Or{inances
1"8.60.060 Criteria - Findings
Peter'Patten had just returned from a time-share study trip' and
stated that he had much to share later, but at the moment feltvery strongly that I00t of the orners rather than 758 (as stated in
the memo) should agree in lrritinq to the proposed time share use.
Ed Drager moved that this amendment be forwarded to the Aown Councj-l
vj.th the 75* changed to read "1008". Dan coxcoran seconded' and the
vote was unanimous (6-0).
The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
,,PEC-+- L0-27-80 t
a
I
o
MEMONANDUM
PLANNING AND EI{VIRONMSNTAL COMMISSION
fRol"l: DEPARTMENT OF COMI'IUNITY DEVELOPI'IENT
DATE: L0/23/80
TO:
RE:
DESCRTPTION OF VARIANCE REOI,IESTBD
The reguest is to encroach 5' into a 15' side setback. There is a l0'
utiliti easement constituting the remaind,er of the setback. The reason
for thL request is to *o.r* aoray from the adjacent duplex.to the east'
ite "*t"ti6r aecii of the two Luildings, wilhout the variance' would be
5 feet apart, due to the proximity of the building env-elopes. .Thus, the
ieq""st is t6 allow some i'breathing room" and privacy between the structures'
CRITERIA A}lD FINDINGS
Consideration of Eactors
The relationship of- the-requested variance to other existinq or potential
uses and structures in the vicini!5
As described above, the building envelopes on this parcel 1re.il close
pio"i*iiv to each other. A settlement was recently reached v/ith. regard
to the width of the duplex to the east, the dispute being over the actual
size of the decks vs what the aPproved plans showed. The owner to the
east is cutting back his decks 4t to aIlovr some room between the structures,
and this requeit i" to move another 5' away. This atlows some visual
iitt*" throu{h the density on this lot ana lids in the reduction of a fire
fr"r"ia betw6en the two d-ecks. No structure will be built on the western
side.
Side Setback Variance request for Jim McDona1d to move the building
envelope on site 15, Casolar Vail II
The desree to which relief fro4r lbs slEjLgE or literal in retation
enforcement of a s requlation s necessarv to acnt-eve com-
aiiuitity and uniformit of treatment amon sites in the vicinity or
to atta e obiectives OI'is titfe wr ut qrant of s cla -i.,i 'l
we feel the physical hardship here is the insufficient distance between
structures ai-rA-the granting Lt the variance is harmless and is an improve-
ment.
I'he effect of the requested variance on liqh! ?nd air, distribution of
d
utilities, and Public safetY-
off the property.line, 6t from the proposed
foundati6n.- It'-rs possible that' if the sewer
area there could be problems with the location
There is a
Iocation'ofline needed
sewer line 4'
the building
work in that
upon re.view of criteria aqd Findings, se-EFip! 19;62...Q50 9f !he^-,^f Conunu4itv oev9toEmgPt {eco+menqs
-t I
/80McDonal-d-2-L0/23
of the house. In the event the location of the foundation became a Pro5lem
due to the grantj-ng of this variance, the owner of the house would be
responsible for solving the problem.
Such other factors and cqiteria as the comlqission deens apPlicable to
None exist
FINDINGS:
The Planninq. a$g 4nviron$enL
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of specialprivitege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties slassifiedin the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propert5.es or
improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance. is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the sPecj.fied
regulation wbuld result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
',\. hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
\-,/
RECOUMENpITTON
The Department of Community Development feels there is a hardship involved
in this case, and that the granting of the variance has a positive effect
upon fire safety, privacy of the homes, and sight lines between the
buiLdings relieving the dense feeling one geta when viewing the lot.
Thus, we reconmend approval wi-th the following conditions: :
If, because of the granting of this variance, problems occur r,.rith future
. sewer line work in the easement, the owner of the structure on envelope
l-5 would be responsible for solving the problem in a mutually satisfactorymainer. i.
:
*
,
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY cMN that James and Tina l"tcDonald have
applied for a setback variance in order to move the buitding
envelope on Site 15, Casolar Vail ff, a resubdivision of Lot
A-7, Lipnsridge Filing 1. Application has been made- in accor-
dance with Section 18 .62.A2A of the VaiI Municipal .Code.
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Seetion
18.66.060 of the Municipal Code on October 27i 1980 at 3;00 p,m.
before the Town of Vail PJ-anning and Environmental Commission.
The applicatiorr and information relating to the proposed
change is available in the Zoning Administratorrs office during
regular business hours for review or inspection by the public.
JIM RUBIN
Zoning Administrator
TOTIN OF VAIL
DEPART}4ENT OF COMMI]NITY DEVE],OPI'{ENT
Published in the VaiI TraiJ-, October 10, 1980;
t o Application Da
I.
APPLICATION FORM FOR A VARIANCE
This procedure is required for any project requesting a variance.
rhe application will not be accepted. until- al-l information is submitted..
NAIIE OF APPLICANT
SDrcS$ p- o. Box 1290, H HONE 305-248-12 00
NAME OF APP]-,TCANTIS REPRESENTATIVE Ross Davis, JT.
ADDSSS p. o. Fo* 190 vair irour 47 6-24L4
C. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
A.
B.
October
d Tina McDonald
SIGNATURE
ADDRSSS
CASOLAR DEL NORTE IIOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
c/o Duane CarlingP. O. Box 2266Vail, Colorado 81657
licants,/Property owners
pHoNE 476-24L4
o^r
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAI.
ADDRESS site 15, casolar vai-l rr, a resubdivisi-on of Lot A-7,
Block ar.
LEGAI DESCRIPTION lot bLock Filinq
November l, 1978 in sookTT-;F- page 947-Eag1e c6@
E- FsE. g100-00 prus 15f for each property owner.to be notified.
F. A list of the names of owners of arl property ad.jacent to thesubject property.
Attorne
Ross Davis, Jr.
Attorneyatl-aw
Telephone:
(3o's].476-2+r4
suire307
Vail Nalional tlank Bl'dg.
P.O. Box tSO
vail.(lJlora(loat657
October 6, l-980
Applicants seek permission to encroach five feet into a
fitteen foot set back variance imposed by zoning regulation.
The purpose of the change in location of the building is to
move the structure approximately five degrees from its
present site location, this will result in moving the
building fi-ve feet to the west and away frorn the nearest
structuie. This structure is currently five feet away from
the proposed balcony of the applicants proposed residence'
ttt" it""tical difficulty to be avoided is the loss of privacy
betw-een the structures; if the variance is denied. The
granting of the variance will reduce the visual density and
proximity of the buildings to each other-
RD/dd
enclosures
7_,
. .21io
chen and
CONSULT
./.12 8 \
{:,,7-jl!.,-iassociates, inc.
ING ENGINEERS
$OIL A FOUI|DATION
ENGINEEBING
SUTTEC-7 VILLAG€PLAZA r GLENWOODSPRINGS,COLORADO 81601
SOIL AliD IDUNDilrIoN n\tllESfT@mSI
PROPOSED RESTDB@, IIII L5
CASOIAR, \AIt IT
\AIL| @LORAm
kepared lbr:
Vietor ttlark Dmaldscn, Architect
1000 l.iqts Rtdge Ioop
VatI &rr
Vail, Co, 8165?
$0it/94$7458
Ocbober 8, 1980Job ltc. 21,136
TABLE CF' @TflE[i}TS
CCIICUISICIT{S
SCOPE
SIIE CIT{DITTCI\IS
suBsorl, cchlDrtlors
E OUIDATIO{ RECODf'{ENDATIChUS
FIPOR SIABS
T]NDERDRAIN SYSIEM
SURTACE DRAINAGE
MISCELIANMUS
FIfi]RE 'I - IfrAXSCN OT EXPINRAIDFg PIT
FIqtRE 2 - GSAHIC IUG, IJEEIiID AllD lplEg
FIGJRE 3 - S'!iIEX.'.IT{NSIJDAfiICN BSC nffiULTS
1
I
I
1
2
3
4
'4
5
l
@NCiltSro$F
The pnoposed residencre can be fourrted with spr.ead
footings placed m tle upper natural soils with
design details and pnecautions as diecussed be1or,r.
S@PE
ltris report presents ttre results of 'a sil md fourdatiqt inrres-
tigation for tie prpposed duplex to be located ar lot 15' Casolar,
Vail II, Vail, oolorado. The rctrnrt pres€nts the rccarmended type
foundaticn ard allorrrable pressures, gereral s$€oil srditions
together with other soil reLated design and onstructim details.
SIIE CCI{DITICI\IS
At the tire of the field investigatiur' t}le site was vacant sd
overed with grass and reeds. Ihe grqrrd surfa€ is smrrfiat irreg-
ular arrl generally sl.opes dCIrn to.the soutlreast with afppximately 12
feet of elevatim differential across the buildirg envelope. D.lring a
prwious investigatior ar a*jaoerrt lot 14, scrre site fiU.ing had or
curred. Haxfutun fiJ,l depth fogged durinS this investigaticn srsisted
of about 5 feet crr the &lrnhilt side.
suBsort ccl{Dlrlcl[s
Itre s.rbsoil onditiors vere investigated by excavatlrq 1 test pit
within the central portio of the buildkg area aa ehorn on Figure t.
the gnaphic lo9 of ttre EubsoiLs €n@unt€red & the test pit is sltoetrt
-2-
on F'ignrre 2. In qereral, the subsoils srsist of a ondcinaticn of
topsoil and nedir.sn stiff sardy silts orcrlying a silty to clayey sand,
grarrcI arrd mbble nixed deposit belcn apptoximate deptb feet.
Occasional boulders r"ere also en@untered in this loner 1ayer.
Results of a consolidatim test perftrmd an a sarple of the sarxly
sil.t indicates a rcderate to high onpr.essibility tpon Ioading and
wetting.
l,bisture sntent of ttre srbsoils ms described as beirq mist std
rp free water sas enorntered d. titrE of excavaticn to tlE rmximm
dteptlr investigated, 8 feet,
FOUNDAgICN RrcOI4-TENDArICNS
I* r.rrderstand ttre duplex will cnnsist of a 2 stsry structur.e harr-
irg a vralko:t ba.serent, I.{axfuirln cut is antieipated to be m tJt cr-
der of 12 to 14 feet. Csrstructisr wilt b nainly of rrcod fram.
Considerirg the sr$soil conrtitiqrs enountered at the e:ploratorlz plt
and articipated onstructior, r,e reecnrnend the use of qnead footings
placed cnl the natural. subsoils fc support of the structure. ltn foL-
lowing design and constnrctior details drould be &eenred:
( 1) Fbotirgs sLrould be plaoed qr the natural s$soils belcrv aryr exis-
' ting filL and topsoil and deaigred fior a rnaxim.m bearirry Ireesure
of 1500 psf. If fotings are extenled dcnn to bear errtlrcly a!
the coarse gnanulu soils, an allonabLe bearing etrnclty of 31000
psf can be used. Inltial settl€fiEnts dlurirq srstructicn EtDrJld
(21
(3)
-3-
be relatively mirpr (1/2 inch s less) a&litiaral differential
npverrrent or the oraer oi 3/4 indr is irdicated if bte subsoils
were to beore rtet. the greatest risk of ditferential rcvenent
is for fmtings plaed on the uSper silts.
lrinfum foting width strould be takerr ae 16 indres fior mlls md
2 feet for mlunrs. '
Fourrlatisr mlls strould be reinforced top and bottcrn tp qlan st
unzupported length of at leaet 10 feet. Basenent walls actirg as
r-etainiry strustul€s slmulcl elso be desigred to resist m eqriv'*
alent lateraL earth prfssure of 45 psf pen foo't bf depth. ltris
pressure assurEs a rcIl-@ilpacted granular filf havirq a srrtace
gradient sloped anay frcm tlte struqture.
A11 topsoil, existing fill and any loca1 sft pock€ts of Eoil
fourd at $E base of the fmtirg excavations sfrould be remved
and ttre fmtirgs extended &trn to ttre lorcr, firm oils,
Perineter fotings shor'ld be plaoed belcrrr firoet depth,
FIMR SIABS
The uSper natural sils other t}ran topsoil xrd ary existing fill
are suitable to supporb slab-orjrade mstruction. tn tle building
area, all vegetation, topsoif and any oristing fill sholt1d be renoved.
Required baci(fiU should qrslst of rurcxpansive grranuLa c sllty
soils mrpacted to at least 90t of Ebardad hocts density at a rots-
ture content near optimm. Ihe on-site soils sttould be sritable fcrr
(4)
(s)
-4-
usie as baddill naterial p,rovided atl o:ganice ard orrersized rnaterial
are renrcved pnricr to pfacrnent. To reduce ftre effects of src differ-
entiaL ttoveltent, all srabs stpu]d be separated frun bearirg rrE nbers
with a positive e:qxnsicn joint md de4j:ately reinfcrced. A rninim.n
4 incfi layer of free-drainirg grarrcI should be prrovided irmdiately
beneath the floor slabs.
In{DEADRAIN SYSIE!,I
Although f:ree vater ms nct enotrrtered 4' tim of erpJoratcy
pit excavation, it has been our e:qlerierm in ares iu*r s thi6 th6t
locallzed seeps olr perctred mter carr de\relop *. tiJres of peak nunff.
Tlnerefore, the lcnrer Lerael c eadr level excavated into tle htllside
shoufd be Frotected by ur urrierdrain systam. rhe underdrain *rould
qrnsist of a perforated pipe snbedded ln a gravel-filred trencfr praced
at least 1 foot beJ.ow adjaent ftoor sl.ab girade and sloped to sritable
outlet. rtre grarrel beneath the flm sLab should be wnrecbed into
the under&ain systen.
SURFACE DRAII,IACE
The follcryirg drainage preeauticns strorrld be cbsetrrcd drrlng con-
struction ard maintained at arl ti.ueE after tte brilding has be€n srF
pleted:
( 1l Excessi\re rcttirr3 tr dryfug of th€ fiowrd*,isr exenattqr Ehould
be avoided during mnstructist.
12)
(3)
-5-
Misoellaneous backfitl arourd hrildings sttould be ltIristernd and
ccnpacted to at least 90t standard Proetc denstty.
llte grouilt surface surror:nding the hrildirg sttould be s]oped to
drain army in alf directiqrs. !& resnnend a ninirum slope of 5
inches in the first 10 feet.
(4) Roof &tnryouts arrd drains *rould disdrarge relI beycnd the Linr
its of all bacicfill.
MISCS.,I,ANErIJS
This report has been prepeed tn accordsrce witlt gerally ecP-
ted soit Erd folrndatiar engirnerirry prractices in this'are fcr the use
by the client for design Flrposes. llfie onclusions grd rcslwlda-
tions sr-dcmitted in this report are based r4on t.he data obtained frcn
ttre expl.oratoL:f pit excarrated at the locatisr shonn cn the exploralcy
pit plan. Ttre natur€ and ertent of valatiars acrrrss tle slte nalt rpt
beom evident until excarration is perfcrred. If furirq sratructlqt'
strbsoil curditions appetr to be differert fisn tlrcse dea€ribed herein,
this offic,e strouLd be aalviged at qrc so trbat re-valuaticn of the
reonrendatiurs nray be urade. !€ rresrmrd ryr-elte obsenvatlcn of, ex-
cavationg and foundatior bearing strata by a solt engireer.
cItE{ Ar{D ASSCTAmS, rNC.
* Q- JILI^L
-@
A
/|\
I
I
N
IIt
I
Sca.le = i'; -
,--/-
l/
,/ay
n;7
azJ6//
,r:x,
{(,:)
Xt-
!'i rrrrrro 1
Sandstone Drive ./
,f >-*.__
,/ ,.t/ \/ /t 9'x,/ ,/ .t'
' . ,{"tt nl- { Ar{.//.// ,' ,/ ryfu2/ ./ bvi;l
//,1'/ trT,;r7,,/,7
Yt
+?l 1?(
\
Location of E:rploratl\t
I€geryl
sest Pit #1
El = 8214'
.E|r{
I
g'
!€ = 11.?
DD = 104.3
q
10
+J
$
I
d
8.
l0
F
DisUdad. hrlh Sqle
1. lbst pit ves e*cavated a 9/24/8O xith a baehoe.
2. ElenraLicn is ry'ruri:mte ad r*as tahesr ftfir contours cn pJan prouided.
3. No free lMater tlas en@un&aed in t*e test plt at the {- ira sf eE@rBtitrr.
4. !E = lhter C$tecrt (t);
DD = Dig Decrsity tpsf).
m ftpsoil
silt (l{,) Sandy
[€diun sLiff, rcist, brq^tn
cl:areI (S-tr) Sarxfy
V odblee end bcuJders, si-:
gP alrfltg?r rdlrn dgrtee xp
'denc, mist, brmr
Ilard Flrnrr S!4l1e
#21, 136 Gr4hic log, Iegend & Itotes Fig|rrce 2
qA-14-79
]tren and associates, i"0
. 21,136 swELL-coNSoLtDATloN TEST RESULTS Fig.
APPLIED PRE$SURE _ KSf
t
chen
i,. :
l.an0 assoctates.
,r ti : i\ . .
a
I nc.
sor L & Foui|DAnoN
ENGINEERING
SUITEC-7 VILLAGEPLAZA o GLENWOODSPRINGS.COLORADO 816,0t .30:l/94s-?458
SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED RESIDENCS, LOT 13
CASOIAR, VAIL II,
vAlL, COLORADO
Prepared for:
Victor MarJr Donaldsonr Architect
1000 tions Ridge toop
Vail Run
Vail' Co 81657
Job. No. 21 ,135 October 8, 1980
H
I
TAELE tr MfCESTTS
ctr{cutsIcNs
SCOPE
SI1E CTIqDITICNS
STJBSOIL @NDITICbIS
FOT]NUArICN RrcOO.{ENDATICNS
FIOOR SI,ABS
TJNDERDRAIN SISTEIII
SUREACE DRAI}SGE
ItrSCEI,IANEC['S
FIq]RE 1 - TOCArICN OF' N(PISRLIQFS PIT
FIqiRE 2 - GRAilC IOG, LEEEND AI\D tgIES
FIG[,]RE 3 - SI{EUT&NSI,IDAIXCN Egr FESULTS
1
I
1
1
2
3
4
'{
)
/
I
ctr{cutsrcr{s
"he
prrcposed residenoe can be fourxied uith pread
footings placed on the utr4rer natural soils witlr
design details ard precauticns as discussed below.
SCOPE
this rreport [resents thre results of a mi]. md fotrrdaticn inrres-
tigation for the proposed dr-rplex to be located cn lot 13, Casolar,
Vail II, Vail, Colorado. 13re re6rcrrt pesents the rcorrended tlpe
fcnrndation ard all.cnnble pressures, general subsoil aorditions
together with dher soil rclated design and oonstructlm details.
STTE trNDTfIC}SS
At ttre tirre of tlre field inrrestigatiqr, the site rcs vaant and
overed wittr grass and lreeds. the ground qrrfaoa is scrmnph* irreg-
ular and gerrerally slopes &lrn to tbe muttr-southeast with pproxi-
rnalely 12r of elevation differential acmEs the buildirg envelope.
Drrirg a pr"evious inrrestigatian cn adjaoent lol 14, this anea ms also
indicated to harp been filled. l{axirmnn fill dleptn logged durirg this
investigation onsisted of about 6 feet sr ttre dbvntrill side. A pan-
tion of the lot appeared to har€ been gr*d with shalt fiLl.
STJBSIL M{DITTCNS
The subsoiL oniitions rrere investigated by excavating 1 test pit
withia the central porticn of tle buildiry al€a as shom on Figure 1.
lhe graphic lo9 of the srbsoils srountered at the test pit is de'rt
l-.
I
-2-
on Figiure 2. In general, tlre subsoils srsist of a orbinaticn of
grranular fill and mdiun stiff sandy silts overlying a silty to clayelz
sand, qrarrel and cobble mixed deposit belcrr apprrxinate depth 6 feet.
occasional bulders r,lere also enmuntered in tJris lo*'er layer' Re-
sults of a crcnsolidaticn test performd qr a satfpIe of the sanciy silt
irdicates a ncderate to high onpressibility ryorr loadirg md wet-
tirg.
lbisture ontent of ttre sbsoils lj"a8 descibed as belng rcist ad
rro free rdater was enounterecl at tille of exsavatiqr to tt|e marcimrn
depth investigatedr 9 feet.
FCUNDATICII RE1X&{EIiDdTIC}1S
$b urulerstand ttre duplex will srsist of a 2 stcry structure harr
ing a vralk-out baserent. Manimm cut is anticipated to be m tl.|e or-
der of 12 to '14 feet. Constructicn Ydl1 be nainly of rmd frale'
Considering the subsoiL cqrditions enountered at the elqplorato4a pit
and anticipated onstructisr, se remnmnd tJ]e use of ryread fiootirqs
plaed on the naturaL subsoils fc support of the structur€. 'Ite fol-
lowing ctesign and onstnrc'ticn details sltould be cbserved:
(1) Ftrotings strould be plaeed cn the natural subsoiLs belan any exis-
ting fil1 and topeoil and desigred ftir a mximm bearing ltressure
of 1500 psf. If fmtings are exteniled down to bear entirely an
the oarse grranufar soils, an all'anahle bearirg caPacity of 3ril)0
psf can be used. InitlaL settlementa dlrrirq csrstructifir thc{lld
I
(21
(3)
-3-
be relatively rninor (1/2 inch or less) aditisr,al differential
rpvenent on ttre order of 3/4 indt is indicated if ttF sttbsoils
r,,rere to becllfie vJet. Ttte greatest risk of differential novenent
is for fmtings placed on the upper silts.
t'lininum footing width should be taken as 16 inches for walls and
2 feet for m1wns.
Fourdatiqr rvalls sbrould be rreinfqced top and tottot to Eran ill
unsupportd length of at least 10 feet. BaseflErt walls actirg as
retaining stmctures should also be &sigred to t€sist ar equiv-
alent lateral earth pressrre of 45 psf pen fmt of dePth. itrie
pressure assunEs a ve1l-aqnpacted granular tiff havirrg a s.rrface
gradient sloped al'ry frtn the structure.
AI1 topsoil, existing fill trd any local soft poeket's of sil
fourd at the base of the fotirg excavaEiorc should be reuoved
ard the footings erterded alown to the louer, firm eoils.
Perineter fmtings strould be plaoed belq,r frcst dept5.
FIPOR SIABS
The tpper natural soils below all topsoif and otisting fill ce
suitable to suF[brt slahnirade onstruction. In the buiJ.ding area'
al1 rregetaticn, topsoil and existing fiLl strould be rerpved. Required
bacftfill strould consist of not-.expansive grarula or silty soiLs coltt-
pacted to at least 901 of stardard Prcctor density * a flDisture con-
tent near optinnn. lte om-site soils sbould be zuit'able fc use as
(4)
(s)
I
-4-
baclcfill naterial provided all crganics *d oversized naterial are
renprred prior to Plac€$Ent. Ilo reduce ttre effeets of smn d'ifferen-
tial rpvenentr all. slabe stpuld be separatnd frun bearirq lde-re sitfi
a positive e:rpansion j,oint arcl dequately reinforced. A ninfusn { in-
ctr layer of freedrainirg gravel should be provided fumediately be-
neath tlre floor slabs.
UT{DERDRAIN SYSIETT{
Al.though free tater was rot enmuntered at titte of orploratey
pit exeavation, it has besr or e:<trxriene il areas ercfr s dtis that
locaLized seep6 or perched water can derrelop at tfures of peak nupff.
iberefore, the lcrrrcr level or eadr level excavated into tjn hillside
shouLd be p'rot€cted by an uderibain system. lhe wrderdrain should
cansist of a perforated pipe elreedded in a gravel-filfed trerdt placed
at least 1 foot beLor adjacent flor slab smde and sloped to sritable
outtet. Tfe gravel bereath the flm slab strould be oonrectedl into
the under&ain system.
STIRFACE DRAB{AGb
I?re folloring drainage precautians shanldl be Ssertred dlrirq ort-
structisr arrl rnaintained at all tirrcs afber tle buildirg has been sr
pLeted:
( 1) Exoessive retting c drying of ttre foundaticn excavatiqt shflrld
be avoided durirg srstruction.
J
I
(21
(3)
-5-
Misce]laneous baci<fifl arond buildings sttouLd be rnisteneil anal
@rrpacted to at least 95* standard Proctcr &nsity.
Ite grourd surface surroundirg the builiting strouLd be sloped to
drain away in all. directions. !€ reonnrend a ninimn slope of 6
inches in the first 10 feet.
Roof dorrrnqouts and drains strould discfiarge rielJ. belud the lfun'-
its of all backfitt.
MISCSJ,ANEOIJS
This report bas been prepared in acco,rdance with gererally acep-
ted soil and foundatioar engineering practices in ttris area fcr the use
by the client for design trrrposes, The onclusisre and reollmenda-
tions submitted in this report are based r:pcn tJre data obtained frcnt
the exploratory pit excavated at the locatisr *rcmr cn the exploratory
pit plan. !1re nature ard extent of variatisrs ac'ross the sib tnEf not
bectnre evident until excavat.iqr is perforrmd. If durirq qrstrustiqr,
subsoil canditiqs atpear to be different frm tlrose described herein,
this office shoutd be advised at cnc€ m tlat re-evaluatict of the
re@firEndatiors nay be made. lS recsurerd cn-site cbservaticn of ex-
cavatitrrs ard fioundatiar bearing stnta br a soil srgineer.
CHEN AtD ASSOCIATES, INC.
*%/.fuJL
Steven t. Pafid.akr P.E.
(4)
/
ffi:ih
'.-3^'"---$'-T
fu.'*;r--&
I
/
ilIr\l
,,.- , ilt,z
tSCATIffi OF ExPilntTORY PIT - Fig. 1
/ I i r\/ ,' / t ,/ /t1
*z{,rcs / / |
I A
-
TEST PIT
EL=8210
LEGEND:
Fi11, silty
with cobbles
to clayey sand
adn boulders .
F
I
-0
-5
-10
SC=l2.5
DD=111.0
F
t
T
t-
Silt (ML-SM), sandy to silty
sand, scattered cobbles and
boulders, nediun stiff, moist
brown.
Gravel (FC-GC), sandy rlith
cobbles and boul.ders, silty tr
clayey, mediun to dense,
noist, blovn.
10
F Hand Drive 5rqple
l-'
F, Disturbcd Bulk t *t:
NOTES:
t1) Test pit was excavared on 9/21180 sith a backhoe.
(2) Elevation is.approxinate and nr$ taten from coatours on pl.an providcd.
(5) No free ltate? was encotrntcred in the tcst pit at the tlne of excaystion,
(4) $C . llater Content (t);
BQ,* Ory Density (pcfi.
,27 1735 GRAPHIC tff6 & tEgB}ID € ItrTES f|g. 2
J O FTDAN I,IOCHSTAOT
GEORGE M. STRAW
FI ICHARD S. STRAUSS
M,A.RJ ORIE J. PLATT
Ilocrrsre.nr, Stnlrw- & S:rn-russ, P. C.
ATTORNEYS AND c'OUNSELLOTS AT LA\/v
SUITE I2II UNTTED BANK CENTER
ITOO BFOADWAY
I)ENvEn, cor,onA'po gozoo
October 8, 1980
TELEPHON E 839.5AO9
AREA COOE 3O3
Ms. Gail Wahrlick
Land Title Guarantee CompanyP. O. Box 357VaiI, Colorado 81657
Pa.Escrow Instructions Regarding Carling/UcXeeSale of Lot 14, Casolar Vail II
Dear Gail
Regarding the above sale which I understand is toclose on October 9, 1980, p.lease be advised as foltows:
1. Enclosed please find a Stipulation and Order forDismissal with Prejudice properly executld by the necessarcyparties to Civil Action No. B0CV299
2. As set forth in paragraph 3(a) of the Stipulation,a $10'000.00 letter of credit is to be delivered to vou-which isto be attached to the Stipulation.
3. Pursuant to paragraph 5 of the Stipulation, acheck or cash in the amounL of 92,513.00 for 1eg-l fees payableio the undersigned's law firm is to be delivered to you.
With regard to the above documents, when you havereceived a1l three, you are hereby authorized to append theletter of credit to the stipulation and tender it la the EagleDistricL Ccurt for ciismissal of t.he lawsuit..
be forwarded to this office. please advise the unclersiqnedwhen the conditions of the escrow have been met.
Yours truly,
GMS/1kr
Enclosurecc: James McDonald
Gail--the $2 ,5I3.00 referred
been delivered to this to in No.office.
HOCHST T, STRAW & STRAUSS, P.C.
P. S.3 above has alreadv
POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE
t
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
COUNjrY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLORADO
civil Action No. 80 cv
JAMES HcDQNALD, et a1., )
)
FOR THS
299
STIPUTAITON AND ORDER
Plaint iffs,
. vs.
DUANn CARLfNG, et al.
Defendants.
Col"lE NOW the Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel
George M. Straw of HoCHSTADT. STRAW & SfRAUSS, P.C., and the
Defendants, Duane Carling and Thomas McKee, individually and
doing business as Carling,/Mcl(ee construction Partnership and
Carling HcKee Construction Company, and stipulate and agree as
follows:
l. That the above-eaptioned lawsuit be dismissed with
prejudice as to att parlies, and atl partiea to pay their own
costs. That, with the exception of the below set forth
stipulation, the above-named parties do hereby release each oLher
from any and all claims either rnay have against the other arising
from the subject Iitigation.
2. That notwithstanding the above, the parties agree
that the stipulations set forth below shall constitute a contract
between the parties and that the District Court in and for the
County of Eagle shall retain jurisdiction, pursuant to the
Complaint and stipulation, to enforce said stipulation in both
law and eguity and award such damages as may be incurred as the
result of any breach of the stipulation by either party.
3. That the stiputation is by and bettdeen the
Plaintiffs and Duane Carling and Thomas llcKee' hereinafter
referred to as the Defendants, and is as follows:
(a) At e:(ecution of this agreenent the Defendants
shall have obtained at their expense a slx (6) month $101000.00
cLean, irrevocable letter of credit pursuant to C.R'S. (1973) 4-
5-10], et seq., payable to the order of the Clerk of the Eagle
District Court which shall be appended to this stipulation. UPon
iL
D=TEIiTESAL WITH PRE.]UDICE
WITH RESERVATION OF
motion of the Plaintiffs setting forth a default Pursuant to this
stipulation, the Cterk of the District Court shall cause the
letter of credit to be paid into the Registry of the Court and to
be held there pending further orders of the Court'
(b) The Defendants jointly and severally do
hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the Plaintiffs from
any and all damages, ineluding reasonable attorneysr fees
incurred by the Plaintiffs, for failure of the Defendants to
fulLy comply with this stipulation.
(c) The Defendants specifically agree that the
Court shall have the Power to enforce this stipuJ.ation in law and
in eguity and to issue such mandamus, injunctions and contempt
proceedings as nay be requested by the Plaintiffs upon motion
therefor and as approved by the Court.
(d) The balance of the agreement shall be as set
forth in the below paragraPhs.
4. Within fourteen (14) days of entering into thls
agreemente lhe Defendants at their sole cost and ."pett"! shall
cause to be performed the following!
(a) Remove the sewer line from the Lot 15
building envelope and place same outside any Portion of the Lot
15 envelope and the overhangs for decks as Per the approved plans
and as approved by the Casolar Homeo$tners Association'
(b) Remove the water cut off valves in front of
Lot 13 and place them reasonably eguidistant between Lots 13 and
14, and remove the water line to outside any portion of the Lot
13 envelope and the overhangs for decks as Per the approved plans
and as approved by the Casolar Homeosrners Association'
(c) Beduce the size of the west deck on Lot 14
such that the deck does not extend' in width. more than four (4)
feet fron the west foundation wall and parallet to said wall to
the deckrs southern extremity and parallet to said wall to ltE
northern extremity where the said deck meets the greenhouse' but
allowing adeguate sPace for opening the greenhouse door and exit
therefrom.
r2-
o
(d) Remove the electrical lines and electricaL
ditches from Lot 15 (and refill any cuts) and replace same to the
same specifications as set forth in paragraph 4(a) except that
the lines passing between Lots 14 and 15 shall be reasonably
equidistant from each building envelope and as apProved by the
Casolar Homeowners Association.
(e) NotlrithBtanding the fourteen (J'4) days set
forth above, the Defendants shalL within a reasonable time and
with good faith efforts cause EoIy Cross Eleetrlc to move the
transforner, electrical vault and related equipment from the
Casolar common Property and relocate same on the road and utility
right of way reasonably equidistant between Lots 14 and t5i and
ulnn the reasonable reguest of Plaintiffs to be not later than
nine (9) rnonths from the signing of thls agreernent' return or
replace all dirt and fill removed from Lot 13 as directed.
5.Withinone{l)dayofenteringintothisagreement'
the Defendants shall pay to the Plaintiffsr attorneys the
Plaintiffsr legal fees in the amount of $2r513'00
6. The Defendants or by and through their agents'
assignsl servants, employees, attorneys or friends shall hot in
any nanner cause or attempt to cause an aPpeal of the Town of
vail p.tanning comnissionrs approval of the building plans as
submitted by the Plaintiffs for Lots 13 and 15 and as previously
approved by the Planning Commisslon.
T.Itistheintentionofthisstipulationthatthe
tis pendens previously recorded on tot 14 be removed therefrom
and that all of the Defendants and the claims against them be
disnissed with prejudice saving and preserving the clains as set
forth in this stipulation against the DefendantEr Carling and
UcKee, for further adjudicationi however. it is tEe further
ardi a) the removal of a rtion of the west deck loc;tgq!
intention of this stipulation that the agreement set forth above
on Lot 14, Casolar Vail fl', a resubdivision of lot A7, Block A
tionsridqe subdivision, aceording to the Plat recorded Novembe
-3-
l, 1978, in 277 at Paqe 524 of the records ol,:!g-ggrk--ang
Recorder of Eaq1e Countv, Colorado, (b) qle-€9ggE--ling
appurtenant to said Lot. 14 and crossing Lqt Ifu and (c) the water
rtenant to tot 14, as defined in the Corqplgjnlr--ehe]!
run with the land and shall be binding Ulen the heirs and assi
of the Defendants to the title of said Lot 15- This agree
sewer and $rater line agreement have-not been complied tltlth to
insure such agreenent iLcomplied &,ith. The Defendants also
agree to execute sugh nemorAndun if requeste{. Subsequent to
completion of the stipulation by the Defendants, the Plaintiffs
shall cause to be filed with the Eagle District court a motion
and order for disrnissal with prejudice of any claim pursuant to
the stipulation.
1980.
wrTNgSs our hands and seals this Znd day of Octobert
PLAINTIFFS:
By!
raw,, agent
and record
DEFENDANTS:
attorney therefor
doing business as Carling/McKee
Construction PartnershiP and
Carling MeKee Construction Company
STATE OF COLORADO
CITY N{D COUNTY OF DENVER
Carling FtcKee Construction Company
)) ss.
)
I, Linda K. Reinkingr in and for said county, in the state
aforesaid, do hereby certify that George M. Strartr agent and record
a memorandum thereof mav be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk
and Recorderrs Office on or after october 20' 19q0, if the deck
cKee, indlvldualry an
doing -business as Carling/McKee
Construction PartnershiP and
-4-
attorney for Plaintiffs, who is personally known to me to be the
person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing Stipula-
tion and Order for Disnissal with Prejudice with Reservation of
Jurisdiction Regarding stipulation set Forth Herein, appeared before
me this day in person, and acknowledged that he signed' sealed and
delivered ttre said instrument of writing as his free and voluntary act
and deed for the uses and purposes therein set forth'
Given under my hand and sea] this 2nd day of October, 1980.
My commission expires MaY 51 1982.
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF
ss.
r,, in and for said CountY, in
the State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Duane Carling, individu-
ally and doing business-as Carling/ltcKee Construction Partnership and
Carling McKee Construstion Conpany' who is persoirally known to me to
be the person lrhose name is subseribed to the within and foregoing
Stipulation and Order for pisrnissal with Frejudice with Reservation of
Jurisdiction Regarding Stipulation Set Forth Herein, appeared before
. rne this day in person, and acknowledged that he signed, sealed and
delivered the said instrument of writing as his free and voluntary act
and deed for the uses and Purposes therein set forth'
Given under my hand and seal this 2nd day of October, 1980.
My conrnission exPires
Ah?--'^'n
STATE OF €€&ORfr.Dd
EiS.
couNlY or
T,, in and for said CountYp in
the State aforesaid,'do hereby certify that Thomas llcKee, individually
)
)
)
a.
and doing business as Carling,/McKee Construction Partnership and
carling McKee construction company, who is personally known to me to
be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing
I
l
-5-
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal r*ith Prejudice with Reservation of
Jurisdlction Regarding stipulation set Forth Herein, appeared before
me this day in person, and asknowledged that he signedt sealed and
delivered the said instrument of writing as his free and voluntary act
and deed for the uses and purPoses therein set forth'
Given under gy hand and seal this 2nd day of october' 1980.
lty commission expires {4-t't-t:
ORDER
TITIS I'IATTER coMING ON to be heard this
octoberr 1980' and the Court being fully advised
DOTH ORDER, as follows:
day of
in the premises,
l.Thatthewithinlawsuit,v'iththeexceptionofthe
reservation as set forth in the stipulation, be dismlssed wlth
prejudice
2. That the Defendants, Duane carling"and Thomas MCReet are
hereby ordered to perform the stipulation as Per'it6 terms.
3.ThatthePlaintiffsareorderedtorsubaequentto
perforrnance of the stipulation by the Defendants, tender to the court
a further order of dismissal with prejudice as to the stlpulation'
BY THE COURT:
DISTRTCf JUDGE
I
-6-
,&06tr77 0M/o GaLP"f /q7
J,ao rd.6ffii^ : tr;4;;4,r@ P}"WD, t'd.,-e *,,hfATEOFCOLORAyO | __ firsrnrtr d
p-
crrY &
County or DEN'ER
lryp$ MqDoNei.n, -tu.i4 tlcoQrtaLD,_JE4N 5{ ttcv }QQCATOE. Trustee-for !J.H. CATOE-CORN I ev'
GROWERS, INC. PENSION RETIREMENT TRUST,
_
t'tcDONALD, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAw, P.A.,
INTHE ----..- -. COURT
LIS PENDENS
Plarnrrlf s
ally and d/b/a CARLING/McKEE CONSTRUC-
$I8xroR8$ofi Bod' o$$ERE*IE$ocit$r oN'CASOI.A,R
D.faodrnL S
Notice is hereby given that an action. suit or proceeding has been commenced and is pending in the
District Court in and for lhe County of
Eagle
DUANE CARLING and tYfttiues McKnE. individu
JAMES McDONALD, TINA McDONALD,
INC. PENSION RETIREMEM TRUST,
McDONALD, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW,
in the State of Ctrlorado, where tn
JEAN CATOE, Trustee for W.H. CATOE CORN GROWERS,
and TINA McDONA-LD, Trustee for JAI1ES W.
P.A., PENSION AND RETIREMENT TRUST,
plaintiff s , and
DUANE CARLING and TtlOl,tAS llcKEE, lndividually and dolng business as CA-X,LING/
McKEE CONSTRUCTION PARTNERSUIP and CARLING McKEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LEO
PAYNE, DEAN L. KNOX' DONALD R. CARPENTER, and CAS0LAR DEL NORTE HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION,
defendant s , r tha( the object of said action, suil or proceeding is to enJoin a tresPass via sewer
lines crossing Plaintiffs' property and in favor of Defendant Carling McKee
Contruction Companyr s property and to require the removal of a four foot
portion of the east and wesE side decks of the property, a1L as described
below.
tn'Hfi{dd;lthtd#qCr*PnVdmhrNlef ffil$*tFlWMlfPtlrlfil,llg$qq.F4rrffbt9qsl.firtgil I
and tha( the following is a description of the proprty affected thereby, to wit:
Lot 14, CASOIdR VAIL II, a resubdlvislon of
Lot A7, Block A, LIONSRIDGE SUBDMSIOII,
according to the Plat recorded November 1,
1978, in Book 277 at Page 524 of the recordsof thc Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County,
Colora,
llocHsTADT, STRAW & STRAUSS, P.C.
Attornevs for Plalntiffs'
l7(X) Broaduay, Sulte 1211 ./
_@nver. Colorado 80290
(303) 839-580e
'l re.c rl fnc.l hy rh. d.(.n.|l.rr
'l I r,\c 'fl'l."br thr d.'nr'fi
."1-'
CONSTRUCTION
'--t
By
OF
OF
JA!iES IICDONALD, TINA MCDONALD,
JEAN CATOE, Trustee for W, H. CATOE
CORN GROI'IERS, INC. PENSION RETIREMENT
TRUST, and TINA MCDONALD, Trustee for
JAMES I{. MCDONALD, ;TR. ATTORNEY AT
IAVI, P.A., PENSION AND RETIREHENT
TRUST,
Pla intiff s,
vs.
DUANE CARLTNG and THOMAS MCKEE,individually and doing business as
CARLING/MCKEE CONSTRUCTION
PARTNERSHIP and CARLING !.TCKEE CON-
STRUCTION COMPANY, LEO PAYNE, DEANt. KNOX, DONALD R. CARPENTER, and
CASOLAR DEt NORTE HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION,
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
CO${E NOW the Plaintiffs above-named by and through
their attorneys, Hochst.adt, Straw & Strauss, P.C. and as and for
a Complaint against the Defendant,s and each of them allege as
follows:
PREFATORY AI-,LEGATIONS
l. Plaintiffs James McDonald and Tina McDonald
{"HcDonald") are the owners of the following described real
estate located in Eagle County, Colorador to wit:
Parcel 15, CASoLAR VAIt II, a
resubdi.vision of Lot A7' Block A'
LIONSRIDGE SUBDIVISION, acqording to
the Plat recorded November Ir 1978
in Book 277 at Page 524 of the
records of the Clerk and Recorder of
Eagle County, Colorado.
2. Plaintiffs Jean Catoe, Trustee for W, H. Catoe Corn
Grovrers, Inc. Pension Retirenent Trust and Tina I'lcDonald r Trustee
for James W. McDonald Jr. r Attorney at tawr P.A., Pen$ion
Retirement Trust (rrTrusLees") are the owners of the following
described real estate located in Eagle Countyr Colorado, to wit:
civir Action N".10 e V 7-tQ
)
)
)
)
o
;ti:3 /../ T. ' :)4.$J. .-. . I tr.
rN rHE DrsrRrcr couRr lrr AND non rHr_..-cr)al.rclcr_sclnyr,,,
COUNTY
STATE
EAGLE ,d,ID
COLORADO
Parcels 12 and 13, CASOLAR VAII-, II,a resubdivision of Lot A7, Bloek A,
TIONS RIDGE SUBDIVISION, accordingto the Plat recorded November l,
1978 in Book 277 at Page 524 of therecords of the Clerk and Recorder ofEagle County, Color;:.1o.
3, Defendants Duane Carling and I .mas McKee doing
business as Carling Mcl(ee Construetion Compan- a partnership
("Partnership") is the ohrner of the follor"ring c scribed real
estate located in eagle County, Colorado, to witr
A Portion of Parcel 14, CASOLAR VAILII, a resubdivision of tot A7, BlockA, LIONS RIDGE SUBDIVISION,according to the PIat recorded
November I, 1978 in Book 277 at Page
524 of the records of the Clerk and
Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado.
4. Upon information and belief, t,he above-described
Parcel 14 owned by Defendant Partnership has been resubdivided
into two separate parcels and improvements in the nature of a
duplex dwelling constructed thereon; that the North East side of
the duplex has been conveyed by the Defendant Partnership to a
third party allegedly named Rubinstein; that the South West side
of the duplex has not been conveyed and renains in the name of
the partnership.
5. That Defendants Dean L. Knox, Leo Payne and Donald
R. Carpenter ('rDevelopers") are the developers of the project
known as Casolar Vail II consisting of fifteen (15) parcels and
Common Properties of which the properties described above in
Paragraphs lr2rand 3 are a part.
6. That Defendants Developers executed and caused to
be recorded in Book 277 at Page 524, Book 281 at Page 634, and in
Book 283 at Page 2BL of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of
EagLe County, Colorado a certain Plat Map, Declaration of
Covenants and Restrictions for Casolar Del Norte and Correction
to First Supplernent to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
for Casolar Vail, respectively, which are incorporated herein by
this reference.
-2-
7. That Defendants Duane Carling and Thomas l"lcKee
doing business as Carling/ltcKee Construction Partnership
('Construction Company") acted as General Contractors for the
construction of the irnprovements situated upon Parcel 14, Casolar
Vail II as is more ful ly described in Paragr ph 3 above.
L fhat Defendant Casolar Del Norte Home Owners
Associatlon, ("Association*l is the owner of the Comnon
Properties in Casolar Vail II Subdivision, as described on the
recorded Plat Map.
9. That Defendantsr Knox, Payne, Carling, McKee
Carpenter and Casolar Del NorLe Horne Owners Association, are or
may be charged with the duty of granting and or locating ease-
ments in and over and across the Common Properties to the diverse
parcel owners in such a nanner so as ndt to affect the rights of
the other parcel owners.
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
9. That Defendants, Construction Companyr Partnership,
Developersr and Association negligently caused or aLlowed to be
constructed upon a portion of the Cornmon Properties adjacenC to
Parcel 13, owned by Plaint.iffs Trustees, a certain htater Iine and
r'rater shut off valves, as is rnore f ully described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and rnade a part hereof.
10. That as a direct and proximate resuLt of the
negligence of the said Defendants, the said water line and water
shut off valves were constructed and located in such a tnanner so
that Plaintiffs are not now able to construct the anticipated
improvenents upon t,he Parcel 13 all to the Plaintiffs damages in
an amount as yet undetermined. Plaintiffs reserves the right to
amend the complaint when the damages are fully known.
SECOND CTAIM FOR RETIEF
11. That Defendants, Construction Company,
Partnership, Developers, and Association negligently caused or
allowed to be constructed upon a portion of the Common ProPerties
adjacent to Parcel 15, owned by Plaintiffs DlcDonald, an electical
t)*r't
Lt slQ'
Ele'
t)nnl+
-3-
line, transformer and vault as is more f u.l-ly described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
12. That as a direct and proximate result of the
negligence of the said Defendants, the said electrical line,
transformer and vault nere constructed and located in such a
manner so that Plaintiffs are not now able to construct the
anticipated improvenlentsi including the dwelling, driveway and
parking facilities upon the ParceL 15 all to the Plaintiffs
damages in an amount as yet undetermined. Plaintiffs reserves
the right to amend the complaint when the damages are ful1y
known.
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
13. That Defendants, Construction Conpany,
Partnership, Developers, and Association negligently caused or
allowed to be constructed under ParceL I5r owned by Plaintiffs
!4cDonaldr a certain selver line serving and appurtenant to the
entire Parcel 14.
14. That as a direct and proximate result of the
negligence of t.he said Defendants, the sewer fine was constructed
and located in such a manner so that Plaintiffs are not now abLe
to const.ruct the anticipated improvenents upon the Parcel l5 a1I
to Lhe Plaintiffs damages in an arrount as yet undeternined.
Plaintiffs reserves the right to amend the complaint when the
damages are fully known.
FOURTH CLAII'{ FOR RELIEF
15. That the sewer line and eLectrical line constitute
an intentional- trespass upon the Parcel 15 owned by Plaintiffs
McDonald in that Plaintiffs McDonald neither expressly nor
irnpliedly acquiesced or gave permission for the tresspass.
16. That as a direct and proximate resuLt of the
tresspassr the sewer Iine and electrical were constructed and
located in such a nanner so that Plaintiffs are not. no!, abLe to
construct the anticipated irnprovements upon the Parcel 15 all to
the Plaintiffs danages in an amount as yet undetermined.
Sc,u't
-4-
7*r
Plaintiffs reserve the right I o amend the conplaint when the
damages are fully known.
FIFTH CLAII"T F'OR RELIEF
L7.. That the sewer line 'as constructed by
Construction Company or Partnership \ serve the entire Parcel l4
owned by Defendant Partnership.
18. That said sewer line enc, aches upon Plaintiffs
McDonaldsr Parcel l5 which encroacbment a., ' tresspass constitute
and unlawful taking without rightl title or interest.
19. That unless said encroachnent is removed
Plaintiffs McDonald will suffer irreparable harn and there is no
adequate or speedy renedy at law.
20. That Defendant Partnership by constructing or
allowing to be constructed upon Parcel 15 said sevrer Line have
created an appurtenance to ParceL l4 which is unlawful and
without righb and if not enjoined will create an adverse
possession and/or an estoppel contrary to the right, title and
interest of Plaintiffs McDona1d.
STXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
21. That Defendants Partnership and,/or Construction
Company have constructed upon Parcel 14 decks not in conformity
with the site plan approved by the various governmental and l
quasi-governmental authorities having jurisdiction over ttre said
Parcel in that said deck is I feet in width on the east and \.rest
sides of the improvement constructed on Parcel 14 but were
approved to be no more than 4 feet in width.
22. That Defendants, Developers and Association
negligently approved and allowed to be constructed said side
decks.
23. That as a direct and proxinrate result of the
irnproper const,ruction of said side decks by said Defendants,
Partnership and Construction Companyr and the negligence of the
Defendants Developers and Association, Plaintiffs McDonald are
not now able to construct the anticipated improvements upon the
w4s
-5-
Parcel 15 all to the Plaintiffs damages in an amount as yet
undetermined. Plaintiffs reserves the right to amend the
conplaint when the damages are fully known.
WHEREFORE, Plaint,iffs pray as follows:
1. For danages as are ascertained,
2. For interest as allowed by law,
3. For an Injuction requiring the owners of Parcel 14
to remove the Sewer Line and Electrical Line fron the Plaintiffs
McDonaldsr Parcel 15 and to rernove four feet of the exteri.or
width from the east and west side decks of the duplex dwelling
constructed on Parcel 14.
4. F'or Punitive Damages as allowed by law,
5. For Attorneys Fees,
6. For Costs Expended herein, and
7. For such other and further relief as to this Court
may seenr just and proper in the premises.
HOCHSTADT, STRAW & STRAUSS, P.C.
By:
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
L700 Broadway, Suit.e 1211
Denver, Colorado 80290
t303) 839-s809
Plaintiffs I Address:
2875 it{anns Ranch Road
Booth Creek,
VaiI , Colorado 81657
-6-
I
!
4"J7'06"8
-?'<+
os4
I
I
't:,lit
I
I
i
lt
*
I
PARCEI,t
,!
i
l
. RECREATION
UNO€R
n €T'i*[{
| ".. ",.t:Iilr 'l'
t,li
I'
I
IIt
I
I
I
ao< {armcl
PAFCE
(
l
'yffi'g--vx--- r*fl
- l.'
,.fr*u F'.'..
i, ,-. I , {).o/....i . /|!,,,ni, y.9t'.y'
r I (,r ilra
i7_-c( t \a ,?!4 !.r|r-:
If,r€P,1O|J( l:1 .- r|l i /:
-seotember 5, 1980
r4r Eci kaJer-, Jr.At:toi'ney- at-Law
Va;. I tiational Bank tsullriinqVaiI, Cclcrado gIS5?
Dear Ed:
- we are qulte coneerned over havr ng a number of r.rregrrr..eritresand impro;'erties c-orrected as soon as possible *hich havebeen eit:her c.aused or precifit"i*a oy |our.ii.ni."the carling,/McKi:.:i:o::*qtruction Conrglny--wniefr_is preeenlty constructing a rtu;,lex'rn Site L4, Casolar ValI If .
You are advised that ne are deslrous of resohring thesematters at- an early date on an amicable basis, ii possinfe,but the seriousness of certatn oi the foltowing-issues i.ssuch that barring an early resolvemer.t sirr result r.n h,.hateverI'egal action is deeane(t n"L"""ir' wilt be taken.
ite are additionally shoclcd as what has been caused,Janaged or precipitated-upon .ur various rots was apparentr.ydone so by the presicent Lr ttre casorar aer uorie Hor(e oe/ners;\s-soei.ation and as a partner and developer^ ot-tie CarIing,/McKeeconstrtrc_tion company. rt ts llkerrse inconeeivable to methat either you or Don Chapltn uould trave any-frrorfuOq". ofc: would have lent any.forrn of aoproval to,such harm, damages,
:;::3"t".itie6 and cr tndeecretirns to an adJoining property
J'|e-yqper cut gfq. valyqs for .sire 1.4 are instart-edru reet east of slre l4,s ruirainq-ent;LD;;;-;;-;;"sL.'uet.ri.The.closest pornt between Sjtes 14 and .rui !j.t.. itis 15 fet:t. ?herefore Carlino set the water cutcff valves over in front cf our orlginally d::signar:ed.:,ite by 3 feet and under our antlclpated iiecfs ,ie;nay buj ld and then @nstr:ucted his water linr: to*-n!r east in front of Our envelooe to prrt gome u.rC€|,:oll.r 3l.Lteipated de.:kc ln a totai dlsreqard fo, .i-t,u.".
1.
September 25, 1980
Mr. Steve PattersonBuilding Official
Town of VailP. O. Box 100VaiI co 81657
Dear l{r. Patterson:
The irregularities and possi.ble code viol-ations andCasolar De1 Norte Declaration violations relating toLot 14, Casolar Del Norte Phase 2. owned by Carling-
McKee Construction and constructed by the Carling-McKeepartnership, are matters which the Town of Vail may wishto consider in determining whether a certificate of
occupancy shoulcl or should not be issued for either thewest or the east side of Lot 14 until all issues andmatters contained in these enclosures have been corrected
and resolved.
I^Te are informed by staff that the Design Review Boardwill apparently not approve our plans for Lots 13 and 15until the issues contained in these enclosures affectingLot 14 and our Lots 13 and 15 are resolved, accomplishedor corrected.
Enclosed are copies of a lawsuit and Lis Pendens which
have been filed against Lot 14 and the Carling-McKee
companies and others. The lawsuit and Lis Pendens areself explanatory.
AIso enclosed are copies of letters written to Carling-
l{cKeers attorney, Mr. Ed Drager, explaining in detail al-lirregularities, improprieties, possible code violations,Casolar De1 Nort,e Declaration violations, and damages toour adjoining properties, Lots 15, 13 and 12.
It is very questj-onable in my mincl that an administrative
body such as the Town of Vail would issue a certificate of
occupancy to a building or owner involved in all or part
of the items, issues, violations and improprieties con-tained in these enclosures until all such issues have been
corrected and resolved.
continued
Mr. Steve PattersonBuilding Official
Town of Vail
September 26, L980
Page Two
cc: Larry Rider, City Attorney
George Straw, Attorney
Casolar Del- Norte llomeowners
you for your cooperation in these and other matters.
ctfully submit!
Jim McDona1d
Association
Jvi/fb
a
.-,v
..--.fl,-,.,:L,* .-.-r
OLra f.(-,&. U.r,*,/(aF^#.^ydJ.* .1...{ '
Mr. Ed haleq Jr.
Paqe 2
September 3, 19B0
2.
?
Everyone ls havlng to rearrange to aome extert therrbu:)dtng envelope but ytth th6 reloeatlon of Siie14 and the extendcd decks to Uolt east and west seare apparently forccd to rearrange.our aite considerably.Aceordlnglf tne englncers and architects j.nfo"* ..t.hat ne should both rotate the envelope "; ;;ii ;"rDve lt sonerhat fonrard. ff not then Carlirrg^{-X.ehas deprived us^91 tl" same rlghts to our pioiertya_s they have utlllzed. Theref6re the locai.i";-;ithe water linc and the cut off rnrve" iiii"-"iri".into our buitding envalope or ao close to lt thatwe cannot build and or under our front decks. Th".r,if sueh had to be repalred at a l.ater date (or as1s the case today rilh ttre present repair) therewoyff be.no rray f9r a aubseiuent property ouner toqet to hrLs r*ater line. I am informeb tfrit therehave been no easemcntg nelther requested by nor grantedto Carling,/l.tcxee for the water and serer tines-aiconstructed and regulred. thig sltuation a_oparentlyhas'only one resul{.
The sewer line fron Slte 14 either comes under ourbuilding sl,te 15 or eo crose to lt that durint constructlon
:!--T"I tr 9ur:s99. _ fualn the sewer could .rerf easirt - ---
have been lnrtalled- to cornpletely mlss our enirelopeand anticLpated deckr.
The electrical'dltch yhlch has been dug to the westof Site 14 was made so flr over as to be eornpletelywithin our bulLdtng envelope and therefore mirst bemoved. Further, the dltch should have never beenmade any further_ayay from the butlding envelopeof slte 14 than 7ll reet (t, of the distince beriieenSites f4 pndt l5'at thelr Clogcst polnt - what ls
_fgir for one ie falr for the other) . 'Thereforewnen the ditch is rmved-ii lr.,ouja u" eqiiilisiintbetween tbe tro hrtldtng envelopea. Sueh ls necessaryto eliminate a hazard- to all paities aE any subseguentdiq up for repal,r rourd be dangeroug if nol so ac6ompliebed.
lir. i'.like Kintztng lndlcates hls total cooperatlonin thi; natter and Lndlcates that yhen thi ditchis dug next tlme .that lt rnuat go tn the eorect rocatlon.
^-..-v
y),)r,,,, //'. t/' ! ''orrr,/r/rf
,ri(,n, "'y tt,/ -./,t,.'. , /." . /
l\:r. Ect Drage4 Jr.pa.qc 2
Se-ptember 5, 1960
).
t
4. The exterior d€cks shlch have been eonstrircted on
the Site 14 duplex exteno out to the east and west
approximately € feet, There is only a dlstanee of
Il feet between the buildinq sites or envelopes at
certain lines. ff we construct our decks the sane
as on Lot 14, the decks fron both of our Site lJ
ancl 15 will overlap onto Site 14.
Mr. Carling says that we should move our building
envelope to acccrnodate hirn so as to not cause hlm
any problems and that he really doesn't care what
or how re build.
A roadway for construition vehieles and trucks was
dug and nrade by Hr. Carling aeross our buildinq envelope
t3 and part of our land actually duc out, up to 5
feet or more and used for fill by Mr. Carling on
his Si-te 14. f just do not unders+-anC t-his way anci
nrethod of doing business. I had told Duane tha.t
he could store lumber and suoplies on our Site 13
but definitely f did not glve him pernission to dig
out fill. or make a roadway.
Site 14 i.s overbuilt its maximum all'otted G.R.F.A-
for the Casolar Vail Daclarat-ions by s52 sq ft-
The Tonn of Vail has officially nof-ified Mr. Knox
that said squafe feet Ytll have to be deducted from
rryr three building sitec. uy reply is of course --
NO WA,Y:
Part of our Sj.te 1.2 hac been dug i.nto by a tracLor,
1n addition the excella flll loeated therepn for e'-'crvone's
use btts going to be renoved by Mr. Carling and as
he said prt ontb our Site 13. We obJected to this
Drocedure !s we would llke to have at least whatil- ieft-of-our shat€ of the exeess fill for our neeoed
construction. Furthcr, rhat he would refili would
not be compacted. 'Agll.n, we cannot understand allYone
doing such to someone elses property, unless this
is the way business la done ln Vaj.l.
A
1
Mr. Ed Eager
Page 2
September 5, lgg0
::"1::,..' : ^ *.*. ^ 135:". :-:_ if ii {g$ -;fr #Li', ili
"
Tli"i"*:3"?t:ntty. ceuscc, aurrns;ffi;;;il;
B. Tbe electrteal trantforrrcr la locatcd on tbe Casolarcqunon prop€rrr, got rn tre-rdi-iifr.Iir_ray, andr'nstde 6rrr- srtl' ri-eaiiitnE
"nd drr.v'r:ay earGrB€nt.rt ls my underatandino iror ur. carrh! in"t n" asstet€dand,/or dtrcetcd trc rLii.gl';i fi;-il:;rorner,ae well as thc clcctrtcal dttch.
- I explatn"at^_!9 UT:- Glling lart ycck tbat t yant to betotally cooperattve ,ain-iif-ill ictgnboru and that r.uantedno tr€re than r ras entttfed tJ hrt tht vgry deftnltely fwould settle for 1o fcsa thi-fAg entLtlcd to. ne havewronsed no one but we rrave ccrternry-6ici-iil;;u and takenadvantage l,n rhat appcara to bc tn e ncr? .Irnprudent tnanner.
we 'rc o"otn!^1_Tlvet-rnldc lnunedtately ao aa to deterrnlneaa accurately aa poearbre ihc elrccttlc abiiirs-oi-ttre lnformatroncpntalnad hereln-. 9ur Archli".[, _r.r". urrk Donildson vtllhave a copy of the auncy and rtil bc able to drrcuss theaematters utth you.
An honest ntrtalc can be undcrctood nany tlrnea, hoveverl^ Tl ! lpl I cltv
. of . r rresurarrt t"I,' rnpropcrtl;" ;; darnaseeElecome! veqz dtfflcult to ccpr-iena.
By thta f"al:I_* are bccgbf.plactrg evcryonc lnvolncdon notlce that there_ BttGrr ruira ue riaorvci-ii tr,"t, entrretyno later than seotT-:_Il-fieo]' otherytrc-*t"tLr"r tegalactLonr' are deernid,I:::!?"Ty-bt ouruetws and orrr coloradoattornlea vlll be lnplemcntlf i,,niqfatcllr. 11pthcr, tn theevent the rater an! cre1 ffaci rna eutoff valvec are notrecolved and/or relocatcd Fi;; il_ oo, crcavatlon and construetlonrn the next reu *iL?: :9_F;un-i.f"i iii-il;;""t"a purres:l *:rf: :I-l 3!_pur. eontaei-lolcrther-io;;;-#" nners
6"G; i;;t;' ;-;,fi;d;.iffi ;H||s[ifi:$.ffi"Ii"damage thereto andTor-to ti-d:ffifr "rr';;tf,g"-J[ .n"rt expenac.
It,
grrEg |f, JtDONALD, ilR.Attornay at tev, !.A.Jltl,/ds
E6c OmcrF Agsoclatlon
)Edf-&o. ,/./fr
September 10, 1980
ffi-raAlff^Z- J1AJ(
P O. toi 'aaoItooo s. w 272rtp srtrEET
TELEPHoNE (Jo s) a4a-t2oo
Mr. Ed Drager, Jr.Attorney-at-Law
Vail National Bank BuildinoVaLI, Colorado 81657
Dear Ed:
fhe damages and problems caused to us by the Carling,/McKeeconstruction partnership and more particulairy Duane caiiingby virtue of his actions continue to mount. edditionaL inf6rmationreceived in the last few days is as follows.
9. A telephone conversation with Mr. Ted, Husky, Engineerat fbly Crosg Electric results in our beinq informedthat lt!r. Carling not only instructed and determinedthe location of the traniformer but actually dld.part of the excavation and,/or constructlon work relatinothereto. The tactic and resurt of moving the transioim6ras far away from the Carling,/McKee site 14 and actuallyplacing tt within the antlcipated driveway and parkingeasement for lot 15 ls both inexplainable and inexcusible
. especiarry since carllng was fully aware of the d,istances'between the building envelopes and upon the placing' by him of the location of the transformer he eitheiknew or had to know that such loeation put the transformerLn front of our building envelope, whether it bein the road right-of-way or not. As indicated fromthe survey, the trangformer has been placed ontoCasolar cornmon property and in the space to be utilized
as the parking and drLveway for our Site 15.
The lmportant questlon therefore raised is why was thetransformer no! placed equldistant between the two buildingsites and in the proper location lnstead of being placedso far west of Site 14 as to create the problems-and hazardswhich lt does.
I
$
t
D
t
p
l
*
ii{
n
1,1r. Ed Drager, Esquire
Page 2
September 10, 1980
lO. Regarding.the plans for the CarLlnq,/t{cKee duplexon Site l_4 we are informed that neither the floorplan, the square footage nor the decks conform tothe plans which vere approved by the casolar HorneownersAssociatLon andlor the Towne of Vall. We have beeninformed that the Sfte plan drawe.ngs for Site 14indicate and show decks of 3! to 4 feet instead of8 feet. If such is corect, then we must take thepositlon that the improperly built decks on Site14 would have to be made to conform to the plansas approvedr specifLcatly tbe site plan.
The confllct of interest posture in which Mr. Carlingpresently finds himself poses some very ihterestlng pointsof raw, especLally in vlew of the probability ttrat the individuarmembers of the Homeowners Associatlon Board is well as theBoard could be held_personally liabtel for their acts of negligenceand,/or intentional damages caused to our properties by amember of the board, and permitted and,/or allowed to happenby the other members of the board. It does appear that theextent of the damages courd not onry be the specific resultof the costs to reetr,fy the various problems caused by carlingbut also any loss in l-ncome and,/or plofits resulting in ourunits when constructed not belng able to be sold at marketand or at as hlgh of prices as they should be by viitue ofthe appearance of the Carling,/McKee duplex with the extendedwings and,/or the lmproper and unsatisfactory location ofour building sites which may have to be moved.
t{d also have been Ied to believe that Mr. Carling iswithholding and,/or reJectlng the approval of our buildlngplans and site locations unJustly, as a member of the boardas a proper determinatlon affects the Carling/UcKee partnershipfinanciarly by virtue of the lrnproprieties and problems causedby Mr. Carling and further that he has indicated lhat should
we pursue these matters contained in these two letters thata boldup of the appfoval of our plans would be a tool or
weapon whtch could be utltized by him. Ed, I am certainthat you recognr'ze the implications of such aetions by Mr.Carling in the event such happens to be true or correct.Prease be assured we will look Lnto this matter in substantiardetail.
tt
$
ff
:-r1
*
#
"l
,](tl
?1
**frd
H
ffi
ffi
J"t*Y-egbrr-ef
.:fu-'.-Sn,t-4n. Jlg "
Y.. Eq Drager, Esqui,rePage 3
September 10, lgg0
rn furtherance of tbe conflict of interest issue andsituation, I was astontshed to ieceive tbe notice of theannual meeting, which r understay F" pi"p"i"a-iy yoo, appolntingand/or naminq Duane carling "r-[-r," proxy. r was furtherdisnayed at iaragraph I ""i""""i"q the ncrnination of fivedirectors oy- a norniir-atrng-;oflunrlt". which eommittee doesnot exist and never rras 6xrstld according to my knowledgeof the Homeowners Association- iarJ-lng even being nominatedbv vou, or hirn, wrth the .""iii.i. "i-iit"i""tlii.". staringeveryone tn the face r.s a further travesty.- ge-Jrrourd bothresign and be disqualifieO tiom-any furthir connectton, actionor vottng rrth the Board. one of the Board Members was notconsulted nor was there a speciai meetlng.of the Board todetermine the proxy._ you miy *i*n to reconsider your orvour cttents approach to certarn "t-t'.r"-ilIi;;;r:"s'
vr
The locatLon of the annual neeting_bgIng in Mr. Carli_ngspersonal home may prove to be somewhat difii;uil and awkward.
There further appears to be a posslble professional confl.ictof interest if vou are representlng the Hqneowners Association asr have been informgcr bv d: -a;;i;ng
and yoo .r"-iiro ,"p."senrinsthe Carling,/Mcxee conslrucif""-p"rt""rship in these veryserious matters.
!9, "" you can well lmaglne these types of Lettera arevery distasteful to have to irtte especiiity from one attorneyto another and wheretn and ttreie-may be certain expranationsfor soqre of the ilems .""i"i""A-in these two 1ettera, thecontinued multinrietty of confricts of intere"i -"na improprieties"f l't5. carling,-assuming fr" wi"-i"ting alone, an outside memberof the associarlon, sucfr as *y""ir, #";;;-;"iy lrrious andwary of what is aetually qoini on.
r have discussed this rnatter again with Don chaplin overthe telephone this afternoon i"J-r indr'cated to Don thatf was certainly desirious of having his unCersianaing anasupport ln this maller especlally since he is the real estatebroker havinq the property riste& and the uiorcer-tirroughwhom the sales are-th!:re-f6r"-pr"".eding. r have known Donfor many years and like rre ant-i"ib"r.-p"rsonariy--very mueh,and r have trieil to-buy gl"flity-inrouqh him as i broxer,even in Casolar, and niedleli to say, I would be absolutelyastonished- if any sales of the caifing/,tcKee Site 14 duplexwere to take place wtthout notice ot [iie pi.ni",i" ;;";;i;:e
&T*g^-4/f," art:.t-(-*; ,:l"* "
.tlllt,/ds
P.S. Aqain, pleaae
any of these
be protected
Mr. Ed Drager, Esgulre.
Page 4
Septembcr I0, 1E80
of hopefull.y responsl,ble peoplpuqpose of resolving and fy t will intervene for thethe overall situation.
in these lettere, and-othentge, whrch could affect the ownershipas well as the fl.nanctal posttton of a subsequent purchaser.r rourd not nant -to see Don Eet hurt ln thiEhattei whatsoever,especlalry tf he hac not bccn knorredgabre of the natterscontalned Ln thcae letters and nor havrng knorledge ia taklnga deftnite posttr.ve courae to rerolve and cure th6 defects -
as cbntained Ln tlie l_etterc.
- l y"ty_?arly resolvenent of th.ls rnatter, I feel certaintould beneflt all lrreons, bo*everr' frou stroutd know thatupon dl'scuesl.ng certaln of these mtterE which were knownto me whtle tn Vall ylth Carllng that I receLved very cooland irreeponalve replles and accordingly it has resulted1l .y having to take the afftrrnattve iclrons taken includLngthe survey, discussione wlth Holy Croas, discussions withothers l,n order to brlng the rnatlerg to light ln the views
rely, 7
{/ //
JeuEs tr.
Attorney
I,iCDOTALD, JR.at Law, P.A.
r that we have not causedproblerns, bnrt re rmrst inslst thatand be equal to aII other property
or precipltated
our righte
owners.
cc: Duane Carling
Thomae McKee
Donald Chafilin
Mark Donaldsonw.u. Klntztng
George Straw
David Fales
Dean Knox
Casolar del Norte Horneovners Aasoclation
Town of VaIl
David WhisenantBill Sandler
o
,:i
,:/''/rt ttt t:S,',/)t'. ,i|:.,,,,,.,/,,.
f//no,ry nl Jo<", "lj,:/.
,//'
(,!<,rrrt/.r.' ., /, . 11' ttrli ,1.?t '. !
r)tl{li)9()
lrOA .i W .:7?'!p:i.pf tl
rl : i.'.ri)NE jOS) 2.aa ,a,jC
September 19, 1980
l,lr. Ed DragerAttorney at LawVail rtlari-onal Bank BuildingVail, i.lolorado 81657
Pl-ease be advised that the requirements necessary toresolve the damaqe issues perpetrated by various partiesincluding the Carling,/ItteKee Construction Company and MessersCarling and McKee, individually, in connect.ion wilh Lot 14and against our properties, Lots 13.and 15, are as follows:
I. The furnishing to me and the other loard Membersthe names, addresses. and telephone numbers of aII
rnembe r s of Casolar de1 Norte Homeoldners Associationto whom you mailed notices of Annual Meetinq andProxy.
2. The removal of the transformer, electrical linesand electrical ditches equidistant between Lots14 and 15 envelope and out of the Casolar CommonProperty,
3. Remove the sever line from Lot 15 building envelope' and place eane at least twelve (f2) feet outsicle. any portion of the Lot 15 envelope.
4- Remove tbe nater cutoff vaLves in front of Lot 14and remove the waterll.ne to at Ieast twelve (I2)feet from our Lot 15 antieipated envelope per thedrawings provlded to you.
5. Reduce the size of the east and west decks by four(4) feet and remove the atrium and the improperwalls relating theret,., pursuant to the site plansubmitted by Carllng and approved by the city.
6. Provide fifty thousand dollars (950,000.00) to beheld tn escrox rritb.an escrow letter to cover boththe cbst and good faith for the performance of allitems of lssue contained 1n thls letter and to providefor the acconrplislrnent of all items of issue contalnedln thls letter to be eompleted within 14 days.
t;,--/J,r$
fu'fla-{,U-*A4E.,ofu-*'g,*-fn gtd -
Mr. Ed Drager
Page 2
september 19, 1980
7. Return aII dirt and fill removed by Carling fromour Lot 13 to our Lot 13 when and where lve so indicateand said fill to be compacted to 951 standard proctordensity.
8. Close off or plug up the 352 square feet overageG.R.P.A. built into Lot 14, or provide us with writtenconfirmatton fronr the city that same will not bededucted from the G.R.f.A: for Lots 13, 15 and 12.
9. CarlLng to restgn frqm the Board immediately, notpursue re-electl.on and restgn as proxy, and ior Carlingand,/or hIs agents or ansoetites to ofier no obJectionto the proposed Stte 13 and 15 SIte plans as piesented.Assuming the complete compllanee wlth this lelter,re would then agree to move the Site 13 as far eastas possible (approxlmately three feetl and south(approximately three feetl and to rotate the envelopeas drawn by the identical eight (g) feet whlch carlingreadJusted Lot 14 envelope. Thf.s moving of ourenvelope is stilt detrimental to us beciuse of theadJoining parties and we would still be four (4)to fLve (5) feet back of Lot 14.
10. We will attempt to move the Lot 15 to the west asmuch aa posslble over present zoning ancl set backlimitations.
11.. We would not pursue the improper floor plan with
. the city on Lot 14.
L2. Aasuming the complete conpllance with this letterwe would not seek further damages against MessersCarling and McKee and,/or any associates of theirspersonally for malfeasance, misfeasance and otherimproperties and irregularities so stated in ourprevl,ously Etated letters.
The above and foregolng ls a written statement of wtr,atwas_stated to you by me Wednesday mornlng, September 17,
J-980. I h9g requested an irnrnediite response and agreedthat I would call you back before l2:30-p.m. that day, whichI did. f also atternpted to contact you two (2) addi€ionaltimes by telephone that sam€ afternoon and at 20 mlnutesto 5, I rrent to your office. Our prevf,ous correspondencestated that a resolvement of the matter from our polnt ofvl.e$ must be completed by September 15 which has i.rot beenaceompllshed. We fited sul.t in Eagle County and fi.led a
l
Mr. Ed. Drager, EsquirePage 2
September 19, 1980
tis Penden against Lot 14 on September lZ, l9g0.
I have remained in VaiI slnce September l?, and I amavailable at any reasonabre tr.me to biseuss tn! accomplishmentand settlernent of the above and foregoing. vfe rrould ippreciatehearing from you and,/or lttr. IqcKee,s ittoiney at the earliestpossible date.
Thank you for your cooperatlon in these and other matters.
Very truly yours,
JAUES t{. MCDONALD, JR.Attorney at Law, p.A.
cc: Thomas MeKee
Donald ChaplinVictor Mark Donaldson
W.M. KintzlngI'tr. David WhisenantCasolar Del Norte Homeoyners AssoclationDean Knox
George StrbwDavid FalesBilL Sandler
Duane CarlingMr. Jim RubinMr. & Mrs. Don GruidelCharles Bonniwelltand Tltle
,x'-i
tr*aU.fl,^L Jt2tl),fdru9.,.4i8 F O lOX t230
rTooo 3. w 27?rP 3fREtt
IElEFHOXA €O5) 2.a- ra OO
198 0September 19,
ilr, Ed Drager
Attorney at Law
Vail National Bank Butlding
Vail, Colorado 8165?
Please be advised that the requirements necessary to
resolve the damage issues perpetrated by various parties
including the CarlingfttcKee Constructlon Company and MessersCarling and llcKee, indlvidlualln ln conneetl.on with Lot 14
and against our propertfer, L,ots 13 and 15, are as follows:
l. The furnishing to rne and the other Board Membersthe names, addresses, and telephone nrlmbers of aI 1
nembers of Cagolar del Norte.Homeowners Association
to whdn you malled notices of Annual Meeting and
Proxy.
2. The removal of the transformer. electrlcal lines
and electrl,cal ditches equidistant between Lots
14 and 15 envelolr and out of the Casolar Common
Property.
3. R€move the serer llne from Lot 15 building envelope' and place sune at least twelve (12) feet outsicle. any portion of the Lot 15 envelope.
4. Renove tbe rater cutoff valves in front of Lot 14
and remove the waterlLne to at least twelve (I2)
feet frorn our Lot 15 antlcipated envelope per the
drawlngs provided to you.
5. Reduce the size of the east and west decks by four(4) feet and remove the atrlum and the improper
walls relating thereto pursuant to the site plan
Eubmitted by Carllng and approved by the city.
5. Provide flfty thousand dollars (950,000.00) to beheld ln escrorr rltb.an eserow letter to cover both
the cost and good falth for the performance of all
iterns of issue contaLned in this letter and tq provide
for the acconpll,stment of all itenrs of issue contained
ln this letter to be ccnpleted wlthln 14 days.
I J
t
r'
il
o r,, r,.,rt' H' :.. li( !,lrrr r.r/r/r rr*
. i1f ,'ra -" ,.r' .,/rirr., . lt ,./
i"lr'. Ed Di.ager
Pt;1t:2
Septexnber 19, 1980
7. Return all dirt and filt removecj by CarJ.ing t-romour Lot 13 to our Lot 13 when and where we so inriicateand said fiLl to be compacted to 95t standard oroctorCensity.
8. Close off or plug up the 352 square feet overagec.R.F.A. built into Lot 14. or provide us with wrj.t"tenconfirmatlon from the city that same will not bededueted from the G.R.F.A. for Lots 13, 15 and 12.
9. Carling to resign from the Board immediately, norpursue re-electlon and resign as proxy, and ior Carlingand,/or his agents or associites to ofier no obJeetionto the proposed Site 13 and 15 Site plans as presented.
Assuming the complete compllance'with this lelter,we would then agree to move the Site 13 as far eastas possible (approximately three f,et) and south(approximately Lhree feetl and to -otate the enve.l-ooeag drawn by the identical eight (B) feet whlch earlingreadJusted Lot 14 envelope. This moving of ourenvelope is stl1l detrlmental to us beciuse of theadJoining parties and we would still be four (4)to five (5) feet back of Lot 14.
10. We will attempt to nove the Lot 15 to the $rest asmuch as possible over present zoning and set backIimitations.
11.. We would not pursue the improper floor plan with
. the city on Lot 14.
L2. Assuming the complete compliance wlth this letterwe would not seek further damages against MessersCarling an{ ucKee and,/or any associates of thetrspersonally for malfea3anee, mLsfeasance and otherj"mproperties and irregrularities so stated in ourpreviously stated letters.
The above and foregoing is a written statement of whatwas^stated to you by me Wednesday mornrng, September l?,
1.989. I ttg9 reguested an immedlite response lnd agreedthat I would calr you back before l2:30-p.m. that day, whichI did. I also attempted to contact you Lwo (2) additionaltimes by telephone that sami afternoon and at 20 minutesto 5, _I went to your office. Our previous correspondencestated that a reeolvement of the matter from our point ofvl,ew must be completed by Septenber 15 whieh has not beenaccompllshed. we ftled suit in Eagle County and filed a
fu'Y-/LZ,--tarT.cb^o"tJi-". (.?/.
Mr. Ed. Drager, Esquire
Page 2
September 19, 1980
L,is Penden against Lot 14 on September lZ, 1990.
I have remained in VaiI Eince September 17, and I amavairabre at any reasonable time to dLscuss tbe accomplishmentand settlernent of the above and foregoing. we would ippreciatehearing from you and,/or Ur. McKee,s ittoiney at the earlieEtpossible date.
Thank you for 1rour cooperation ln these and other matters.
Very truly yours,
JAI{ES W. McDONALD, JR.Attorney at Law, p.A.
cc: Thomas McKee
Donald ChaplinVictor Mark Donaldson
W.M. KintzingMr. David WhisenantCasolar DeI Norte Homeowners AssociationDean Knox
George StrbwDavid Fales
BiIJ- Sandler
Duane CarlingMr. Jim RubinMr. & Mrs. Don GruidelCharles Bonniwell
Land Title
l7 September, .l980
Mr. Jim McDona]d
2875 Manns Ranch Road
Booth Creek Townhouses
Vail, Co'lorado 8'1657
sites 13 and .l5,
Casolar Vail
Victor Ma
Di rector
ps: Your submittals haveorigina'l subdivisjon
that a written letter
I
a1so been revjewed and approved by the
developer, Mr. Deane Knox. He advjsedof approva'l is forthcoming.
Dear Jim: i
We, the Casolar Vail Board of Directors, have recent'ly
reviewed your submittals for your proposed duplex residences.
As a Director, I hereby grant preliminary approval and suggestthat you proceed through the Town of Vai'l Design Review Board
process for their approval . Upon receiving approval from the
Town of Vaii, p'lease submjt to us final plans and specificationsfoh our final review.
. l.|e have recently had one of our three Directors resign and
another abstain from reviewing your projects. Therefore, I shall
discuss your projects with the homeowners at our meeting this
coming Saturday. To prevent any furthers delays, I advise thatyou obtain approva'l from the Town of Vail as soon as possible.
s i ncere
rk Donaldson
I,-
tru*r Ff. Dn acER, .r*. O
.ttton xgi- J.ri D couNri[Ltrn
P.O, BOI ,6r|A
vaIL corlrR.tDd ar661u
! .\.(i1r * llrlirr {}f-l$t{
September 12, 1980
James ll. McDonald, Jr., Esq.
Attorney at Larl
Box 1290
Homestead, F'la. 33030
Re: Casol ar Vai 'l
Dear Jim:
i acknowledge receipt of your September 5, 1980 'letter relating to
sone concerns you have with relation to Building Sites i3 and 15
ovrned by you and/or your client in Casolar Vail II. t.le have carefully
reviewed your letter and your severa'l points, examined the site and
are endeavori ng to deve'lop a'l l.relevant information relating to your
concerns,
I'le too, are extremely desirous of working out a fair and practical
solution to the issues that is in the best interests of and advantageto all concerned. I have also discussed this matter with Dean Knox
and George Straw at'length and we are all hopeful a resolution of these
issues can be reached very shortly.
I will respond to the severa'l pointS in your letter jn the same order
as presented:
1) The water shut-off va'lves are 17 feet East of the building
envelope for Site 14 and approxinately 3 feet outside your Site13. It is our intention to relocate this water line so that itwill $e 8 - 10 feet outside the boundaries of your present bui'ld-'ing site.
?) I,le have atternpted to determjne the exact 1ocation of the
sewer line running West from the property and jt is presently
under one corner (Southeast) of Site 15. lle will have a survey
Monday, September 1.5, 1980, locating all utilities adjacentto Site tr5 and wil] determine whether it is best to move Site
15 to the l.lest and how far, and then determine whether the
sewer line needs to be moved. If necessary, it will be moved
, so as to be 8 - 10 feet outside envelope #15.
3) The electrical transformer between Sites 14 and 15 was in-stalled on the road right-of-way by Holy Cross Electric. Mr.
Mike Kintzing. ran his electric servJce frorn the transformer tohis job site and has agreed to move those lines, if necessary.
Fi&{ I )). }, tsi,x, ri
vAlL t,\ J rl I \1.
I|.tNri tll,lii,
i:3p-rf.gnlbgr 1.2, 1980
irage 2
ol
4) The exterior decks on the duplex built by my c]ient ari] as
sho',rn on lhe origina'l bui ldinq plans 'approvea by Dean Knox,then representing the Caso'lar Homeowneis Association and b.y' the Town of Vail Design Review Board and'town of Vail tsuil.l-inq Department.
i) l'!". Carling agrees that you gave him penn,ission to storebuilding materials on Site 13. it was necessary to do someminor earth work so as to make the slte usable.- l'le havelocated a topographic survey done by Richards Engineering priort0.your acquisition of the property an( have requested theyupdate that survey.to shory any chairges in elevation. lle w-ouldtlel, !f you desire, restore Slte 13 to its oriqinal contourswith clean filt of the nature orlginally (at time you acquiredit) on the slte compacted an 75 --95fl rite.
6) The GRFA was approved by lilr. Knox and noted by the Town ofVail. Mr. Knox advised trlr. Carling, at the time of approval ofthe plans, that he had plenty of GRFA left over and Duhne was
welcome to use some of the extra, which Dean approved for Site14. The Town of Vall zoning ordlnances are spbcific in lot tobuilding size ratios and in this case (Casolai^).the Town merelyadvised Mr. Knox of the maximums pennitted and told him theallocation was his, but he would be bound by the total maxinum
GRFA a] I ored .
7) lle don't really understand your conment here since Mr.carling has acceded to your wishes and done nothing with respectto the dirt pile on your sltes. sorne of that exceis fil'l is'still
on the cofimon ground, but I understand the triplex site has alsoused scme.
8)_ I have been advlsed by Dan Corcoran, who originally assistedHoly Cross in sitting the transfomnr, that it ii enti'r"e'ly inthe rfght-of-way, but Dan also advlses he made a survey error
and that a corner of the transformer is off the road right-of-way. I will have to await the improvement and uti'l .ity surveypreseht'ly being done by Dan's office.
Jim' by this letter, I want to assure you of our willingness to reviewyour concerns resolve the mes that are clearly wrong and work towarda mutual reso'lution.of those others where we can be-of assistance.
;,'
r
!1
1:l
|1.
,s
rl
.f,
i
''''i
)!.,
el
I
I'j
ilrl
F]
4l.'tj
t
*{ltiI
#
lalr{
$
l1l*$
n
it
ta
TI
Tf
it
,l
il
$
&
$
h
${
rs
George Straw, Esq.
M . Dona'l dson
IrtI
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Archit€ct Address and Phone:
il 'l. s |(:r
Legal Description: Lot .l 3 / /J Filing
Zone:.
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
'/ - r-l lyuDate
Motion by:
Seconded bv:*,n't., /ht-n
DISAPPFOVAL
/4..1, l. t . - r,r..,: t,,r, t L :z--
Chief Building Official
' 7.. a- ,. -r=.' i:4f' jt
Proiect Application
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptio nt tots--/-3.i.15 , Btock
Zonel
Zoning Approved:
Filing
Motion by:
Design Review Board
,^r. 'AilfO
DISAPPROVAL
/
,Xaa7x7y"
"6lrr! art,
't
h /t 4"r.(
7.-r,, t,,;i.ol,/
ing Adininistrator Chief Building Official
R
,/_\', sFR, Lg,/
zoNE cilEcK
for
P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
.o nl5
legal Description: Lot l-'" Block - Filing
tl0nner /Yr Da..lALD Architect
i Zone District LDIL/ f proposed Use;,i' Lot Area'Nk -gt.*f,lv.' ueight Alloried 30' proposed Zffif ,'
Setbacks: Front-ilequiiea z0i'--Fioijosed
Sides-Required l5' Proposed .4 .')
Rear -Required l5' Proposed 4/4
GRFA:
GRFA:+n-ael+Ue,-ea -
Landscaping: Required { b
Parking:
.*imar)-freposed
Proposed
Ptnop c: ed
Corrments:
llaterccurse-requ'ired Ui+ Prop
AI I ot'ted
Secorfuf*ttomed--
? /./Site Coverage: Alloived Qlc Proposed
-1
I /'lRequired L/ UP/T ' q-
(-.-.'ODrive: Slope Permitted b -/a Slope Actual
Environmental/Hazards: Ava'lanche
Flood Piain
Si ope
Propo:''ed
1^,r,,/1,,'i, tt {t .
D;t.J:Z0:r'inc : iipl:'ovcil/Disi.ppro''lci
Date
LIST OT MATERIALS
NAME OF PROJECT
LEGAL DBscRr prror_;flr,on BLocK &c l*eUmT
DEscRIprroN oF pnwscr -Tt@ Wl_ UoaL dte*+4
FI LI NC
The
to
A.)
following lnformationthe Design Review Board
BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wa1l Materials
Fascia
SoI iits
Windows
lVindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
fland or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enc I osure s
Greenhouses
Other
ts required for submittal by the Applicant
before a final approval can be given.
Type of Material Color
--a- ltTuw l*" #
frpsf {toorL
-P-c*di +r r\Ar{tJ" o.orlo*l
D. ) PLANT MATERIALS(Vegecative,^Landscaping l'larerials including Trees,and Ground Cover)
Botanical Name
?rpulul
fFa^,'.| ^rhl-
Common l{ame gg3!!!!.y.
Shrtrbs ,
Si ze
a lot't?,1
Itl
5 qpl,
fqp{,
hcr*
SFF4FT'
6"ldrdar.Ar4df
te.rtdui Cu{r"rA rd.%
-tb
to
Lxto lz.Alrr,),
Att dt!+q$.t Afil'lr {" bq saeJn{ u.*t.btnqqp,
ilRnrc{ tlJrrdso&.
DaEe
LIST OII MATARIALS
NAITE OT PROJECT
LEGAL DESCRTPTTOU l3 r,Ot I el,ocr
DESCRIPTION or pnO.lnCt frtt.rg3 .S{el dJooA &-A,*i,e -
FILING
The following informationto the Design Beview Board
A. ) BUILDING MATERIALSI
Roof
Siding
Other WaI1 Materials
Iascia
Sof fits
1{indows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
ls required for subnittal by the Applicant
befoie a final approval can be given.
Type of Material Color
Rah C("* - Bc.o.rzz.
Pr'*f L nt{tlu U0rCls[r---_-
including Trees, Shrtrbs ,
E.) PLANT MATERIALS(Vegetative, Landscaping l'laterials
and Ground Cover)
Botanical Name Common t{ame
?oP.r.\u)
Tirruorlorlcr
Ptctr'
hrruFanJ
B,lcnr A"na"rr-..
tFfatrr. _
Quantity
1
e
-lo
Si ze
ti:tt
tol
-lf ,t -{,1.
Atl o\rr*.rbt 4&Ar
$rr{}soA Btuelas.
S [e sr^Jn{ *rr*l* Arals'.l
t
LIST OF MATERIALS
T{AIIE OF PROJECT
LEGAL DESCRIPT€N 15 IrOtr
oere f $. lr ri&o
,FILITG
DESCBIPTION OT PRCIIUCT
The- fol_lowlng lnformatlon ls requLred for subnltteL by the Appl.lcantto tbe Design Revles Board befoie a finel ;tpr;fii-.ri u"-slffi;--
A. ) BUII,DING MATEBIAL$:
Roof
Type of l[aterlal Color
S{zt{r-ar, lf- a e La ^-
,erl
l3 0ctober, l9B0
Ms. Gail l,lahrlick
Land Title Guarantee CompanyP.0. Box 357
Vai I , Col orado 81657
Estoppel I information
Lot 14, Casolar Del Norte
Dear Gai I :
' The Homeowners Associationof each building envelope as a
The solar colIectors must
functioni ng.
is now requiring an "as-buiit" survey
requirement of good standing.
be in place and capable of proper
The Association dues presently owed for lot'14 are in the amountof $87].71 through October 14, t9B-0. The per diem thereafter is $.|.67.
comp'l iance and completion of all nratters pursuant to the setilement-Lipuiation with McDonald properties'lots l: aho 15 by 0ctober l6;.l990.
Casolar Del Norte Homeowners Association
:--u{Ee
LIST OT MATDNIALS
NAME OF PROJECI
LEGAL DEscRr PTrou_J5_r,cyq BLocK C4s" lea Unt 1
DESCRIPTION OF PBO.IACT
FILING
Tbe
to
A.)
fo1Lowing infornationthe Deslgn Revierry Board
BUILDING IIATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wal1 Materials
l
ls required for submittal by
before a flnaL approval can
the Applicant
be glven.
Type of llaterlal 'Color
2,xrc lrJ.uc,LFascia
:" Soffits
Windows
Window TrLm
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
uw&
fa. -* *o ndolr or.rlo,rrf
including Trees, Shrubs,
B. ) PLANT IT,IATERIALS(Vegetacive, Landqcapins Materialsand Ground Cover)
Botanical Name
hpulul.fP-,.lqrlrfhcra * lS ro-. rt'
SFt'.rr#6"ldr.t r '
Cb&trlf F lpl,Ids%-
t1
Db*z
Att" dtr*uabr.L ARgal S h s4FJ&l
bh1p1p,
- frtsl {*de
Pqsrnol .b ,rrp|l srfi,q
Palln CIA - &aee.c
-ft"tt {" r*rtj" '$rdla$s
Common l{ame Quant_i.tv Size
\r.+L F&sor.l {lrrr{rq61
o
-LISf oF MArEqrArq
NArrE oF n"o.tscr M"bo{4LA \.^€le t( --
PrFoN 13 L(n :uitrr Cllpoue UAat tr ',frLrxc
or
Dete
I,EGAI, DESCBI
DESCRIPTICN PRO'ECT
The foll.owing infornatlon is requlred for subnittal by theto tbe Design Revler Board before a fluel approval can be
A. ) BUILDII{G IilATEAIAL$: Tvpe of Uaterlal Color
Boof
Stding
Otber f,aL1 liaterlals
Appllcant
glvea.
ioo)
dLt-
Fascia
Sof fj.ts
Ylndows
Tindos Trlm
Doors
Door Trim
Eand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flasbings
Chlnneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.) Pr.ANr MATERIALS
Jcl\*- CgA &,6,.fen -
A..r.rL co La na srlourl o*
(Veqetative, _Landscaping Materials including Trees, Shrrrbs,and Ground Cover)
BotanLcaL Nese
EouItel
hg*rto,drl
Prcr.e.
Size
roitzl
lo'
t lol
f 1*1,
9uantitv-
Z6-
F-
J
A
-t-_
Sp,o*.*6tH..'t
Cormon Nemb
rur-Odsda
Z xl1 D.linool
lalb CL*I ho^rae
Att du+"nl*J- Aa,e-r t bg $,r&l ur,*L Hcpr.r.l 0{l,dlrorl
BL*f{Usr.
E
.l,.'ue
o aLIST OT MATERIALS
NAME OF PROJECT
The
to
A.)
LEGAL DESCRT Prr oNJ3__ror_l_
DEScRTPTION OF pnO.iucr -frr*r* S-lsel dJo.A &-Onn.
B. ) PLANT MATER.IALS(Vegetauive, Landscaping Macerials incLuding Trees, Shrubs,and Ground Cover)
Type of llateriaL 'CoLor
P*1ot-4 -4 4,1 rrd, !Pcfll c;Ld- - Bn,an.cz
SizeBotanical Name Common Name
?oP.r\'r$T* 'lotAcr
B,lc*r Anrrt*.
3r'{.I.6;llsl'Caf,frff
taauurgufua sad Onrr.t
'.
Alt alur{"rh{ AeeA} {. [0 &rrf{ *,{" Rrs!,"t
Qualtity
C{pt5
f6
*1
(ol
51*[
-.rlla q-tt
followlng informatlonthe Deslgn Revlew Board
BUILDING I{ATERIALS:
Roof
Sidlng
Other fall lleterials
:
I'aseia
Sof fits
lYindows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Bails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
is requlred for submlttal by the Applicant
before a final approval can be glven.
LD
3.rl
lct .l?'
Prc.'r
Nr(AsrA S[ua$al.
7
I Date
LIST OT MATDNiALS
NAME OF PROJECT
LEGAL DESCBIPTIOU IX rcN I
DEScRrprroN oF pnotEcr frr*nr s{e.l ilra.& &-{*ra
The
to
A.)
followlng infornatlon
the Design Review Board
BUILDING I{ATERIAL$:
Roof
Sidlng
Other lall ltraterLals
Fascia
Soffits
tfindows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Triur
Hand or Deck RaiLs
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
ls required for submlttal bY
before a flnal aPProvel ean
Tvne of l{aterial 'Color
the Appllcant
be g1ven.
i
Cosunon Name Size
ti -n'
9Drr&n6;udCud*f?
Att otrr{.,r"bl. Ane.Ar Jr h smfat \A*L t,trflor.]
tot
ls i*L
-at t- aIff
NrdsoA bhr&FArr.
g. ) PLANT I'{A?ERIALS(Vegetat,ive, Landscaping Materials including Trees, Shrubs,and Ground Cover)
Eotanical Narne?"pffi! --tlrrmrtardcr
Prct*
Quantlty
Ctp]s
- llb
*4
t
trhr A,"ncr^^.
t I
LIST OT MATENIALS U
NAME oF pnorucr .Mc.SprrA(A b\n$ler
T,EGAL DEscRrprrox l me nr.w &*lrclnttr
-FrLiNc
The
to
A.)
DEScRrprroN oF pnotwr 'Tt*@, Stt,iul , (!Q6/' fu
is requlred for subnittel by the Appllcant
before a flnal approval can be glven.
Sype of llaterlal
I xro |rrLlroJ"
P1u',ol la ,nphl s,luq
Palh clA - Enoezn
-Pr"di t, "att .,l\dlo,l!
following infornationthe Deslgn Bevleu Board
BUILDING I{ATERIAL$:
Roof
Siding
Other Wa1I Materials
Fascia
Sof f its
Windows
lfindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Iland or Deck Ratls
Flues
Ilashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Othef
'Color
B.) PLANT MATERIALS(Vegetative,^Landscaping Materials including Trees, Shrubs,and Ground Cover)
Botanical Name
?.prrkrl -fta-. Lorlor
Common Name QuanEitt Si ze
Ur&
* lS lsl nl
llt
P*brt a"rr.r^at
SFf 't'o
6"ld*.terr{tll?5 ldl,
ler^nrul Cu{+.e Id%
*tt dn+unh,l ee$ S h s4F{*l
'-1,*b
:- *.2 f,lp|,
frpsf {uuz
b\s1'u.$ H{a.u'l rtJrdrd-
v
U,r13 | TTL&o'a'ra' t)-'
It V6 Sa^-'4=
NOTE! THIS PERMIT MUST
ELECTRICAL
BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PERMIT Permit #: E95-0148
75 Soath Frontage Road Departmenl of Community Develapment
{i'}-fr'f;ffifif!ri', i::-lg::""": @oRrE DRsrarus. . . : rssu'D
FAxe70-47e-24s2 i3i35i"fi;. . I lror-014-14-o0s ?33i#:: '.i 33ll3li:"'ZProject No.: Expires..2 02/24/1996
APPLICANT WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX 1712, AVON CO 8l_620
CONTRACTOR WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX LLL?, AVON CO 81620
OWNER
Phone: 3034734236
Phone: 3034734236
lnvestigation>
tli lt ca L L---->
.00
5.00
Ite.m: .O6000 ELECTRICAT DEPARTMENTo7/L2/1995 DAN Action: APPR
DepI: BUILDING Divj-sion:
*****ffi*tr*****#*****t*ffr********trt*fi*ffi************fi*******ffi**************t*********ff**i-t*******ffi*iffi*******
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
ffi***tr***ff*ffi*ffi*ffi*#ir*ffi*ff***t**#**f*****ffiffifi****ffi*****tr******ffi**tr**tr*ir*firrffi*tr****rr******
DECLARATIONS
I. hereby .acknovtedge that I have read-this appl,ication, fil.!ed out in fuL! the infornation required, conpteted an accurate ptot
P[an, and state that att the inforration provided as rcquired is correct, I agree to compl,y g.ith the iniorration and pLot pl,an,to compty trith atl Town ordinances and state [aus, and to build this structune according to the Toun,s zohing and subdivisibncodes, design revieu approved, Uniform Buitding Code and other ordinances of the Tovn appticabl,e thereto-
REotJEsrs toR lNSPEcrIoNs SHALL aE IADE TtTtENTY-FouR HouRs IN ADVANCE BY rE[EPltoNE AT 4 OR AT OUR OFFICE FRO'.I
OR CONTRACTOR
ffii:i?ll 3-, DALLA' rx 7s230
Description: ELECTRIC PANEL
**tr***fi*ffiiir*lck*i:**tr**rtlrrrr**trt*#r**iritrt**ft******ffi
E[ectricat---> 50.00
DRB Fee
ToTAL r€Es---> 53.00
H**ffr******#ffi***ffrt**lrffi*#*tr**tn!Hr*J.***#ffi*Hff******ffiff*********fi***lr**ffi*ffi**!H*******tr**********ff
Valuation:2, 000 . 00
FEE SUHI'IARY ffi ir*rt*ffirtrt*******f*htr#r**fbt*fi ******f*-ffrffi**#*Jr*
Totsl Calculated Fees---> 53.00
Additiofial, Fees-----> .0O
Totsl Permit FeF------> 53.00
Payments-------
BALANCE DUE----
{,p*,no*"*o
o
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL IIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Peilnit #: E95-0148
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139 Job Address: 11s0 CASOLAR DEt
FAX97O-479-2452 Location...:
Parcel No.. : 2103-014-14*008Project No.:
APPI,ICAT{T WIRE NUT ELFCTRIC
PO BOX 1112, AVON CO 81620
CONTRACTOR WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX 1112, AVON CO 81620Oi,fNER SCOTT RUSSEI,L T
5716 MEIJSHTRE DR, DALLAS TX 75230
Description: ELECTRIC PANEL
Department of Community D evelopment
MORTE DRStatUs... : ISSUED
Applied . .. o7 /!2/!995Issued...: 08/28/1995
Expires. . : 02/24/!996
Additionat Fees-------->
Totat Pernit Fee---->
Phonez 3034734236
Phone: 3034734236
.00
53 .00
Valuation:2 , 000.00
*rr**rt*#*#*,tldr***#*tttrtitfr}*lrtrHrtffr*ffi*****##********* FEE SUlll,tARy #****t**H*|.t******r|ffi*tnt*J*,t*****t******ffi******
Etectricat---> 50,00
DftB Fee
Totat Calcutated Fees---> 53.00
Invest i oat iorD .00
l,,iLL CaLt----> 3.00
TOTAL FEES_-> 53.00
Payments------
BALANCE DUE-_..00
,.***rrr**********ffi**ti*trffi*ffi*ffi*f*ffiffi'*ffi***ffi***fi****ffi*ffiff*****#r**ffi*****tnHr*rt**tr***rt*r.***
ITem: -06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENTO'l/!2/1995 DAN Aetion: AppR Dept: BUILDING Division:
******ffitt'**#ffi*************************rtJi*tr**!t****#**fi**rrl*l***t******lJ.i****rh|*it*#r*htfirt********tt*U****t***
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
**trffi*rr****ffi**#***ffi#ffffi***ffi*ffrtlrf,rl***trl**ffi*ffi***icttr*'H#*t****ffi*-t*#r;**ffi***t**************Jrtit***
DECLARATIONS
l. hereby .acknovLedge that I have read this apptication, fitted out in fuLt the infornation fequired, compteted an accufate ptotplan, and stat! that aLl the intornation pfovided as required is correct, t agree to conpLy vith the iniormation and pl,ot ftan,to conpty lrith aLt Town ordinanceg.and state_taws, and to buiLd this structure according to'the Town,s zoning and subdivisibn '
codes, design revieu approved, uniform Buil.ding code and other ordinances of the Tovn appLicable thereto.
REQUESTS TOR INSPECTTONS SHALL BE I.IADE TI.IENTY-TOUR HOI,IRS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 38 OR AT OUR O'FICE FROII
OR CONTRACTON
{p*"otto'uo
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECfRICAT PERMIT Permit #: E95_0148
75 South Frontage Road Departmerrt of Community Development
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139 Job Address: 1150 cAsoLAR DEt MORTE DRstatus...: ISSUED
FAX970-479-2452 Location...: Applied..: O7/L2/1995Parcel No..: 2103-014-14-008 lssued. ..2 O8/28/L995Project No.: Expires..: 02/24/1996
APPTICAIIT WIRE NUT ETECTRIC
PO BOX LLtz, AVON CO 81620
CONTRACTOR ?IIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX LIt?, AVON CO 81620OV'NER SCOTT RUSSELL T
5716 MELSHTRE DR, DALLAS TX 75230
Descript,ion: ELECTRIC PANEL
.00
3.00
rLem: -06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT07/12/1,995 DAN Action: AppR
Dept: BUILDING Divisionl
Phone:3034?34236
Phone: 30347 34236
Valuation:2, 000 . 00
*lr**lr**trrFi**tl{rt.tr****rr*******#thJr******ffi**tri**#r,t*** FEE SUI]|ARY *******ffi**lr*********t**tr***Hot**********rrff,*#**
Etectricat---) 50.00
oRB Fee
Total calcutated tees---> 53.00
lnvestigation>
tli tL cat t---->
.00
53.00
TOTAL FEES---> 53.00
Payments----*-
BALANCE DUE----
cr*lrt*i**#****thitr*****ffiH*ffi*ff**********lrr*ffffrt*rr***lr*********ffi*#**rH**ffi*****fiffi**"Hfi*****ff*******ffifi****
Add.itional'Fees--.--->
Total Pernit Fee------>
*rti*******rr**f,f,******t********ffi*'|jr************f***f*s*********i**************R******ffi**ffi*fff#*****i-H****t**ffi**
COND]TION OF APPROVAL
tt*i*ffitffit**tr******iffi#tJr*lc**Jc***tff#rJrrr*ffi**tr**#***t*****t*i**t***.t**#tlrittr,tr*ffit*rt*t*******ffi**ftfffi**"t*ff*
DECLARATIONS
l- hereby .acknovLedge thgt I have read this application, fiued out in ful,L the infornation required, compteted an accurate ptotptan, and stat! that atl the infornation provided as required is correct. I agree to conpty vith thc iniormation and ptot il,an,to compty uith att Toun ordinances and state taws, and to buitd this structure acconding iothe Toun's zoning and subdivisibncodes, design review aPproved, Uniform Buil.ding Cod€ and othen ordinances of the Tovn applieebte th€reto.
REAUESTS FOR INSPECTIOTS SHALL BE IIADE TIIENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY
{P'"n"uo'no*
fti-pLo t'to. za'uzo
ScaTf
NOTEI THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
APPLTCflNT
I
CON?RACTOR
OWNER
E tectri ca l,-->
DRE Fee
lnveEtigation>
Ui l.l. cat t--->
TOTAL FEES--->
Job AddressLocation...
Parce] No. .Project No.
50.00
.00
3.00
53.00
WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX LLL?, AVON CO 81620
WTRE NUT EI.,ECTR]C
PO BOX tttzt AVON CO 81620
scoTT RUSSETL f
5716 MELSHTRE DR, DALr.,,AS TX 75230
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
1150 CASOLAR DEL MORTE
210 3-0 L4-14-008
Permit #: 895-0148
DRStatus...: ISSUEDApplied..: 07/t2/Le95
Issued. ..t O8/28/1995Expires..r O2/2a/1996
Phone: 3034734236
Phone: 3Q34734236
53.(n
.00
53.m
53.00
.00
Description! ELECTRIC PANEL
** FEE
Valuation:2, 000.00
SUI{ ARY
Tota[ catculated Fees---]
Additionst Fees------->
Total Permit Fee------>
Payment s------*
BALANCE DUE----
IteM: O60OO ELECTRTCAI, DEPARTMENTO7/12/L995 DAN Action: APPR
Dept: BUILDING Divieion:
*****hr*i**i*****ffiffi
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
ffnt*
DECLARAT]ONS
I hercby acknorrl,edge th€t I h6ve rcad this application, fitLed out in futl the information requircd, corryLct.d an rccupatc ptot
ptan, ard state that aLl the infocmation provided as requi red is correct. t agrce to conpty rith the infornation rtd ptot ptan/
to compty vith al,t Tolrn ordinances and state [aus, and to buil.d this struoture according to the To nrs zoning and subdivision
codes, design revieH aFproved, Uniform Bui Lding code and other ordinances of the Toun applicabte the.eto.
NESUESTS FOR I]{SPECTIO}IS SHALL BE IIADE T$ENry-FOUR TIOURS TN ADVAI{CE BY TELEPIIOilE AT 479.2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROfi 8;OO A 5:OO P[
SIGNATURE Of O!'I{ER OR COIITRACTOR FOR HT'TSELF AIID OII}IER
r o
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POS?ED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
JOBSTTE AT ALL TIMES
Perrnit #: E95-0148
t
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frantage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970-479-2r3V479-2139
FAX970-479-2452
E lectri ca t--)
DRB Fee
Invest igation>
tlitt CaL L---->
TOTAL FTES--->
Department of Commanity Development
APPI.,ICANT I{IRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX t7t2t AVON CO 8L620
CONTR.ACTOR WIRE NUT ELECTRTC
PO BOX 1112, AVON CO 8L620OWNER SCOTT RUSSELL T
5716 MELSHTRE DR, DALLAS TX 75230
Description: ELECTRIC PANEL
Job Address:Location...:
Parcel No..:Project No.:
50.@
.00
.00
3.00
53 .00
1146 SANDSfONE DR
2103-014-14-00I
Status...
AppIied..
fssued. . .
Expires. .
ISSUED
07 /L2/ree508/2e/wes
02 /24 / Lee6
TotaI calcutstad F!es-->
AdditionaL tees--------->
TotaL Pernit Fee------>
Phonez 3O34734236
Phone: 30347 34236
53.00
.00
53.00
Valuation:2,000 .00
* *lt|t** FEE SUlll4ARY *#.#*#!i**ttffi***Jri#n*tffi**lrtn!*rht*lntt*trrhttn*
Payments-------
BALANCE DUE---
'rff***ts*lH*ffi****#t**#rttffi****ff******tr't't***jdrf**'t*'***t*ff**#H#***trffi'r*****t****
rIe.m:,06000 ELECTRICAI, DEPARTMENT07/L211995 DAN Action: AppR
Dept: BUILDING Division:
lr*rHrffi*i*tffirrrffi***ffi****-,t*ffi,H*H*************tr**ffi#**f,ffiffiHfihfr#rtr******ffi*rl*****t****rtffirt*ffit******
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
*tn|*J<**{rbtrt**fffi*t*r***rcrrJr'(l(}*,r*r.**ffi***lrtritr*tii*trjr*.**ffi***l**i**H*ln$*f***rHrintf#rSt*}ti-**rn*****tf***lr*********
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknoutedge that I have read this apptication, tit[ed out in fuLl the inforDation rcquired, conpl.eted an accurste ptotptan' and state that atl tha infofmation pnovided as reguired is correct. I agree to coDpty with the inforoation and ptot ptan,to compty lrith al,t Tovn ordinances and state teus, and to buitd this structufe aecording tothe T€/Lrn, s zoning and subdivisibncodes, design review approved, Uniform Buitding code and other ordinances of the Town appLicabte thereto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE }IADE TI,IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN IDVANCE BY
{rs **o,uo
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * rt * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * ** *
TowN oF vAltf coLoRADO Statemnt****************************************************************
Statemnt Nurnber: REC-0058 Anount:
Palment Method: CKI660 Notation:
s3.00 08/28/95 tLt52rnit: l4MC
Permit No:
Parcel No:, Site Address:
This Payment
E95-0148 Type: S-BIEC
2103-014-14-008
1146 SANDSTONE DR
EI-,ECTRICAL PERMIT
53.00
s3.00
.00
: Account Code
01 0000 41313
, 01 0000 41336
Total Fees:53.00 ?otal ALL PmtB!
Balance:
Description
ELECTRICAI PERI'TIT FEES
WILL CAI-,IJ INSPECTION FEE
****************************************************************
Amount
50.00
3. 00
1-
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
POSSED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #; 895-0148
BE
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139 Job Address: 1146 SANDSTONE DR
FAX97O-479-2452 Location... :Parcel No.. : 2103-014-14-008Project No.:
APPLICAN? WIRE NUg ELECTRIC
PO BOX LL12, AVON CO 81620
CONTRACTOR WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX 1172t AVON CO 81620OWNER SCOTT RUSSELL T
5716 MEIJSHTRS DR, DALLAS TX 75230
DeScription: ELECTRIC PANEL
Depaltmefi of Community Development
Total, Cal,cuLated Fees--->
AdditionaL Fees--------->
TotaL Permit Fee------->
Payments------
Statu6...: ISSUEDApplied..z 07/I2/L9es
Issued. . .: 08/28/1995Expires.,z 02/24/1996
Phone: 3034734236
Phone: 3034?34236
53.00
.00
53.00
53.00
Valuation:2,000.00
*ffi**J*l.*lktr**ff(ffi*** tEE SU HARY *Jrf,tt#*r.frrffffi**fffi****f*iffi*ir*****t*ffi***
Etectri caL--->50.q)
oRB Fee
Invest igat ion>
l{i t L Cal.l.--*>
.00
3.00
TOTAL FEES-_> 53.00 BALANCE DUE--_
****ffi!t**t.*ffitrff.**rr****|t*ffi**#rtt"/r,r|t***-Jt******fi*rt****:l**th}lr*rt****ftffffiffi#*ffi**f*#*#*******f,***fi*****f,
Ite,m: .06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT07/L2/I995 DAN Action: APPR
Dept: BUILDING Division:
rt*rt*tffi*!t**|t**ffi*rr**ffirh*ffJr'.*tr**lt|tdr:t*tr*ffirffiffi**Jrrr*ff.*#ri'ffrir*,dci*****#rHr*J*fffi*ffi*Ht*f,ifi*****tffi**i**
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
**rrlt*,l'r**t**lrffirrfrl****ffi****ffits**,***f***t*#r********lcr(**ffi**i****ffi*i-*****ff,******ffi#*tr**ffi****ir********
DECLARATTONS
I hereby acknoutedge that t have read.this apptication. fiLled out in futt the infopmation rcqui red, compl.eted sn accurate pl,otptan, and state that atl the information provided as required is co.rect. t agpee to co$pt y vith the infornation and ptot p[an/to comPty vith atl. Town ordinances and state taws, and to buitd this structure according to'the Tourn's zoning end srlbdivisibncodes, dcsign review approved, Unifori! Bui tding code and other ordiMnces of the Tovn afpticabl,e thereto.
REAUESTS TOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE ttA'E TI.IENTY-TOUR HOUNS IN ADVANCE 8Y
{p*"*,
t q*-
Permit No: 895-0148 Tlpe: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Parcel No: 2103-014-14-008Site Address: 1146 SANDSTONE DR Total Fees: 53.00This Faynent 53.00 Total ALL Pnts: 53.00Balance: .00****************************************************************
Account Code Description Anount
O]. OOOO 41313 ELECTRICA', PERMIT FEES 5O.OO
01 OOOO 41336 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.OO
T t
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
EI,ECTRICAL PERMIT
Job Address: 1146 SANDSTONE DRLocation...:
Parcel No..: 2103-0 14-14-008Project No.:
APPIJICANT WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX LLLZ, AVON CO 81620
CONSRAC?OR WIRE NUT ELECTRIC
PO BOX I1I2, AVON CO 8L620owNER 9COrr19,. &u8$seL r
5?16 MELSHTRE DR, DALTAS TX 75230
Description: ELECTRIC PANEI,
o
.fOBSITE AT ALI, TIMES
Permit #: 895-0148
StatuB...: APPROVEDepplied..: o7/12/r9e5Issued...t g7/t2/L995
Expires..: Ol/o8/1996
Phone:
Phone:
3a347942:,6
3fi47t4z:,6
Valuation:2, 000. 00
* FEE SI'IiIIARY
Ete€trical---> 50.00'
'oRB Fee
Tota I catcutated Fees--->
Additional Fees--------->
Totat Pertnit Fee--*---->
PaYmcnts-----
BALANCE DUE-_-
55.00
.00
53.00
.00
53.00
Investig.tion>
Iti tt catt---->
TOTAL FEES_->
.00
3.00
53.m
Dept: BUII"DING Division:IteM; O6OOO ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENTO7/L2/I995 DAN Action: APPR
*****rcH********rfi***r*
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
**r**ffit***tff !htrl******|h***#ff *trffirtrttr$#:h*ffi ffi frrr**ffi*ff***f
DECLARATIONS
I hcreby acknowtedge that I hav! read this applic€tion, f i l,l.ed out in futl, the information requifed/ conpteted an accurate plot
ptan, and statc that at[ the inforDation provided as requi ned is corrlct. I agree to corpty uith the informatioh and pl,ot pl,an,
to compty vith aLt Toyn ordinanccs and state taus, and to buitd this structurr according to the Tounrs zoning and subdivision
codes, design rwiev approved, unifor[ Building Code and other ordinances of the Town appLicabte thereto,
RESUESTS FOR II'ISPECTIONS SHALL 8E IIAOE TUENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROII 8:OO AI{ 5:OO PII
SIGNATURE OF OI{NER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIIISELF ANO d,INER
APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT I.fAY NOT BE ACCEPTEDI
.-- vua \,va'lF!r.Cr L .!:,J-JL tr/I\ !* l'Lll lI\'rI .9.gr llrvry.cl.trrlE|rt
!* * ****** ******* ** ** * *** *****'t't pERMJE-TJgg)RI.{ATr9N *****************************
7Y /t -\-ElectricaJ.[ ]-Building [ ]-Plunbing l-Mechanical I j-Other
Job Name:fehfi essr ,//fQ &rolnr. 0r
Legal Descripti onz t,oE1fuL Block_ Filing
ov,'ners Name: f"tr<Jl T fe;\t'Address: //fr (nrofan 0.Ph. g7( -za,?ql
Architect: Ccr Address: /ion77a h|rtutu Ph.
General Description:
work class: [ ]-New i7J-att"rution [ ]-Additional [ ]-Repair I J-other
Nurnber of Dwelling Units:Number of Accornrnodation Units:
^ {prnber and Type of Fireplaces: cas App}iances_ cas Logs_ Wood/pelleL_J_It
trr* **** * ** *** * * *rr**rr*** * ****** ***** VALUATIONS *********************************rl
BUILDING: $ELECTRTCALz $ 4, oo(5 OTHER: $
TOTAL,: $-
INFORMATION ********* ******************
Town of vail Reg- N-o. f 9/-6
Address:Phone Nurnber:
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
Address:
Reg. NO.
....-F'__
a
ELectrical Contractor:neg. uo.9.?2-6-+x qe7 c
Plunbing Contractor:
Address:
Mechanical Contractor :
Address:
******************************** FoR
BUTLDTNG PERMIT FEE:
PTUMBING PERMIT FEE:
MECHANTCAL PERMIT FEE:
EIECTRICAT FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
lown of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
oFFrcE usE *******************************
BUILDING PI.AN CHECK FEE:
PLUI,IBING PI,AN CTTECK FEE:
MECHANICAL FI,AN CHECK FEEI
RECREATION FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
'?
BUTLDING:
STGNATURE:
ZONTNG:
SIGNATURE:
Cornments:
CLEAN I]P DEPOSIT REFITND IO:
o
75 south tronlage road
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 4?9-21.38 or 479-2139 ottlce ol communlty development
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITII THETOWN OT VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DE\rELOpltENT
MARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERTAL STORAGE
rn summary' ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for anyperson to litter, track or deposit any soil, ro"i, sand, debrisor rnaterial , incLuding trash &unpsterS, portable toilets andworknen vehictes. upon-_any streetl siae#aircl -;ti;y or publicp1?9" or any portion rheieof. The righr-"i-;;t ln att Town ofVail streets and.fgags is approxirnately 5 ft. off pavement.This ordi-nance wirr be striliiy enrorcie by the ror.rn of vailPubric works Departrnent. perslns found violating this ordinancewill. be given a 24 hour written i"ii""-t"-;;;;;'".id rnateriar.rn the event the person so notified d,oes not cornpJ.y with [il---notice r.rithin rhe 24 hour tine ip""iii.a,-'il"-;;;iic worksDepartment wilr remove said rnateiiai it irr" -""p""se of personnotified. The provisions of tiris ordinance ;ffiii'not beapplicabJ-e to cinstruction, r.ini.t.nce or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the iitni_"_"uy.
To,review ordinance No. 6 in fur1, please stop by the To'rn ofJlif su|:rding Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for yourcooperation on this rnatter.
Read and acknor*ledged by:
fi.e.contractor, owner)
75 south trontage road
vail, colorsdo 81657
(303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 ottlce of communlly deyelopmenl
BUILDING PERI'IIT ISSUANCE TIME FMI,IE
If thi:s Peryit requt:res a Town of Vail F.ire Department Approval,Engineer''s .(.P_ubl ic lrlopks) review and approvat ,' a piinntni-oepr"t entreview or Health Department review, anb'a review by the duiiiringDepartment, the estimated time for a total review itui i.le'as t6ngas three weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits willnave t0 follow the above mentioned maximum requ.iremlnis. Residential
ll9-':r.ll proiects-should take a lesser amount of time. However, ifresrdential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
9:ryrlm:nt:,.with regard. to necessary review, these proje.ii"ruyalso tal(e the three week period.
Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite thispermit as s,eon as possibl e.
I, the undersigned, understand the pian check procedure and timeframe.
fe-off 'tnl*,nl
Communi ty Devel opment Department.
7
'nEtr?r3t
f|4/\VlSh 6,6t44
o
REOUESTS
TNbJN DF VFIIL, CCILORI
FOR INStrECTION l,lORK SHEETS FORr 4lIglgh trAGE
ffREA: EG
flctivity:
Hddre ss :
Locat i on ;
Farce I :
Description:
Appl icant :
Owner:
Esntract cr:
E95-O144 4/lQ/96 Typer B-ELEC
1150 CA5OLAR DEL FIT}RTE DR
e103-o14-14-A0S
ELECTRIC trANEL
T.IIRE NUT ELEETRIC
SCOTT RUSSELL T
!,IIRE NUT ELECTRIC
Statusr ISSUED tronstr: ADUtr
Occ: Use:
Phone = 3834734E36
Fhone:
Fhone: 3G34734236
Inspeetion Request Inforration,....
Requestor: BRENDA./NIRE NUT ELECTRIC
Req Tise: Ol:OO Corrents: ,'i >'ftere requested to be Inspected...
80190 ELEtr-Final '
Fhone z 476-4?36'
Tire E
Inspection History....,Iter: O0llA ELEC-Terp. PowerIter: g0leB ELEC-RouqhIter: 60139 ElEC-f,onduitIter: 46146 ELEC-FIise.Iterr BOI9O ELEC-FinaI
4'tr' ' Fl '
.att
+r CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
NOTE _ COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
D^rE JL3/24 t 6560
Irn rlrilllT
dcpartme,nt of community development
TO BE FILLED OUTCOMPLETELY PRIORTO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
I eurlornc D pr-uruerHcI elecrnrcll I FouNDAnoN
F[ urcnlnrcRr- n
I 146-A sAND-sroNE DRlv*'=-
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III I V V
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP ABE H IR U
DIVISION 122a34
GdAERt
ftFEc fl filo [85 "88$ rrn-rrmrml
PERMIT NO. -
z
tr
fJ
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
PTUMBING
fFRm$s*xxxlXRfl rijlQlilfi xQexRe*Exfi {EeX
I"iECHANIC,r $5,000.00
TYPE GROUP G.F,F.A, VALUATION PERMIT FEES
LEGAL
rpEsc.
tot L3 n eLx----j BUILOING PERMIT
+
o6xl=
rfr
a
4-Ltl'/ri-,>U
FTLTNG. ( 'gsotgJuf,i-
PLAN CHECK
lOa runur' CAMPTSI ELECTRICAL
OWNER NAME CMPISI NEW (X ) ALTERATION I AODITIONAL O REPATR PLUMBING
MA'L AppREse ll46-4 SANDSTONE 1
DWELLINGUNITS T ACCOMMODATION UNITS
-
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
NO. FIREPLACES
MECHANICAL $100.00/$25.00 Pc
clrY VAIL, C0 PH476-5586 RECREATION FEE
ARCHITECT nnu IVe INSULATION: TYPE THICKNESS R-VALLUE OESIGN REVIEW BOARO
MAIL ADDRESS CLEAN.UP OEPOSIT
crw PH.
Exr.wALLS | | |USE TAX
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM N/A T{ILL CALL $3.00
TYPE
OF
ELEC.
"ro, "ot^"wooo
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.TOTAL PERMIT FEES $128.00
DAN STANEK I/4/94
]urcrnrcnr-
CONTRACTOR
FIRM N/A ADOITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED'
Y N INITIAL
ST. CUT
urlorlc orprcr,el- -oATE -
}NING AOMINISTRATOR DATETOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
BLASTING ONING & BUILDING NOTES: .AS TEST, ROUGH MECH
FIELD INSPECTION IS RE
TO ENSURE BOILER MEET
PLUMBING
FIRM PARKING
T''IWN r)F VAII E|FG N')ANUFACTURERS spEcs llr@
CONTRACTOR NSfEU'rroNS ARE REQUIRED By THE TohAI 0F VA
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
F|RM JERRY STBLEY ! & H, L\C I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required,
completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is corr€ct. I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and stat6
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other orri licable thereto.
SIGNATURE OF
AND THE OWN
s of the
CONTBACTOR FOR HIMSELF
rowN oF \/ALL ne6. po. I 34-P
TELE. 827-5736
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TQWN OE]VAIL REG. NO.
TELE.
-'-- --
14 - -j'_.'
,aJa.4 - .51
-":_ .' -F-]-l:.:
OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
departmgnt of community development
TO BE FILLED OUTCOMPLETELY PRIORTO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
fl eutLorr.rc n pluuar.lc
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
I elrcrnrcRt- f FoUNDATToNI naecl4gt-c1,r*Srn,*u o*ru,
NOTE
DATE
_ COPY
Liile4 0j
hm
II.TO-A SANITSTOi{E DRIvE
LEGAL
d)ESC.
taEU | /-, ,. . ttLn_.l_---i--------_*rtlittc +----,--_.--r-.*
Ioe NnMe, ca4Prsl
OWNER NAME cAi'tP1s1
I146*A SAND$?OI{E l
MAIL ADORESS
.,r, vAIL, CO PH476-5596
ARCHITECT rrnu N/A
CITY PH.
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM L.i/ A
TOT/VN OF VAIL REG.J.IQ, .:
}r-ecrnrcnr-
CONTRACTOR
FIRM N/A
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.
iitECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
FrRM JERR'{ SIhl.iiY }r ,$ ii, lilc
TOWN oF VA1L REG. No. 134-P
rFl E 8?7-5736
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
TELE.
1. TVPE OF CONSTRUCTTON I ll lll I V V
2. OCCUPANCYGROUP A B E H I R M
DIVISION L22a34
c€ [SRt flFEctRilo tfl EwBBt izmrvsrrmnrror
PERMIT No. u'J -
z
tr
J
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
!fis*sfs0t :rn<llflftdf:$trxnnxrfi &{xrfi &ex
HECHANIC 'L $5,000.00
TYPE GROUP G.R.F.A. VALUATION PERMIT FEES
BUILDING PERMIT
..#
PLAN CHECK
ELECTRICAL
NEW(2r) ALTERATTON ( ) ADDTTTONAL( ) REPATR( )PLUMBING
DWELLING UNITS I MECHANICAL $190.001$25.00 Pc
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
NO.FIBEPLACES RECREATION FEE
INSULATION: TYPE THICKNESS R-VALLUE DESIGN REVIEW BOARO
'.oo^ | | |CLEAN,UP DEPOSITtl
EXT. WALLS I I USE TAX
FOOF IdILi, CALL $3.00
TYPE
OF
HEAT
SOLAF
GAS
wooD
TOTAL PERMIT FEES $128.00
'AN
STANSK L/4/94
.ADDITIoNAL
PERMITS NEEDED:
Y N INITIAL
sr cur | | |
utLotNG oFFtctAL DATE
)NING ADMINISTRATOR DATE
BLASTING pN tt{q Af u I L 9l tl.9.ft Q T-eQ'
FIND IhSPECTION TS RE.'*^^" I I I
Pr(-r r!Dr, r\rj(;Lin t"ltLir tLr llN,\Lrxt $oILEi( riLET
e
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required,
completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply wilh all Town ordinances and state
laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of thgAown applicable thereto.
SIGNATURE OF
AND THE OWN
l(L
Legal DeEcrLXrtion: Iot-_ Block_ glfhg
florrners Naret (-xr*pAi tddrere; .1@
:t * :l * rl * * * !r * * ** * * * !r * r* * * * * r. * * CONIRACTOR II{ rORMATIONeneral Contractorz Lt/AI -r-^- -E!
, I $lectrical ContrasLqr:Tsi{n of Vail
Phone Nunber:
Toun of vail
Phone Nunberr
Reg. $O.
Contractor:Reg, NO.
Sutlottrc pERMTT txE!
PTUI.IBING PER}TIT FEE:
'qECHANICAL PERI{IT rEEi
SLSCIBICEIJ TEE!
SIHEB IYEE 0F FEEI
ffin FEEI'' U./t/ | lnLL
,.-/ao, 6a
3'6o
Ph.
Architect;Addrrss:Ph.
tGeneral Description:
..t'$ork Class: ffi-rew t l-AlterEtion I l-Addittonaf [ ]-R€pair [ ]-other
EIECTRTCAf,: f OTITERI IttEElrruficerr,W.1€TArJ!W
*:t!t* ** * * * :t* * **r *** ** * ** ****
Town of Vail Req. $O.
Phone Nurnber:
Address:
Irlunbtng
$ddress:
iNurober of, Duelling Unitss /Nunber of AcconnodatLon Unl_tsr
and ,!I1pe of, Fireplacest Gas Appllances Gas Logs_ Woodr/pellet
* * * il * * *t * * * !r * * * ** * * * * tt * * * * * * ** * * * VA!'{TATIONS * ***rr ****'* *** ******* * $!r**** *****t
;t- "
lovn of Vall Req. No. /34-P
Phone Number: ft?-r+€;-
{*i*****i*******+**t************FOR OFFICE USE ***rr**********i****t*****rr**rr
SUTIJDTI'IG FI.AII CHECK TEE:
PIIIUEfNG PLLII cEEeI( FEEI
CIIEi[!{.UP DEPOSIT:
INOEAI. SERIIII! FEES;
BOfLDINC!
STGNATI'RE!
BONINGT
SIGNAIURE:
6,/fr///4(FzL'a < t/t/.
I
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT!
... ,: (,/I .'I JOB NAMEDATE
INSPECTION:
CALLER
T,UES ..- WMON
7.a
READY FOR
LOCATION:li i i'
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
C FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH i D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
_ ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING EGAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr
o
tr
o
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr
o
tr
CONDUIT N SUPPLY AIR
tr
FINAL N FINAL
EI AFFROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
'l
DATE INSPECTOR
I
PERMIT NUMBER OF.PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
\. . tl. tl n nl'L Lili {{ ('a u4 X ,
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL'"'irn-|.r ^'-r',)2 - 5, 3L
Pl\4,.
JOB NAME
CALLER
TUES THUR FRIWED
D,1LOCATION:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATERE FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL .dtr,"o.
ELECTRICALT
tr TEMP. POWER
. MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr o
tr FINAL t1r,"o.
, ) L,,/
PROVED DISAPPROVED EINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
t
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL !
479-2138PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES
TOWN OF VAIL
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n BOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
D INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL D
o
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRICAL: )
T] TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr D
q FINAL D FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
rfLE COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
so3-479-21 3 8 / 479-2 I 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
November 17,1994
Depanment of Community Development
Mr. Bill Pierce
Fritzlen Pierce Briner Architects
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Bill:
After speaking with Susan Freedman today, I am withdrawing the Campisi250 additional
GRFA application. I understand Mr. Campisi is interesied in finishing out the large downstairs
room, but will not apply for a building permit until somelime in the Spring of 1995. lf you have
any questions regarding this matter, please contacl me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
FI!. T COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
30i-479-2I38 / 479-2I se
FAX 303-479-2452
November 10 , l'99 4
Department of Community Development
Bill Pierce
Box 57vail, cO 8L658
FAX 476-4901
Dear Bill:
After walking through the Campisi unit yesterday' the following
conclusions!/eremade.Tbelargeunfinishedroomdownstairsisnow
counted as 6RFA. It is my undeistanding that thjs additional floor
iiei-*oura pug the uniu over its maximurn allowable GRFA. However,
this overage does nor i*pu.t Lhe use of a 250. The applicant can
add up to 25o additional square feet of floor area if all
upp:-i..Uf. zoninq standards cJn- be met' The applicanE can also
ii^rri."n o..-tt Uhe l-arge room to Ehe extent allowed by the Uniform
euildinq code. aa.q,tut. natural light and ventitation must be
provided as we discussed on-site.
However, Section 18.?L.020 of the Zoning Code requires an applicant
io mitiqate the 1oss of enclosed parking when ugilizip.g a tt250't to
converr. garage "pjce to living area (6RFA). This requirement is
;i;.;it !t,at6a in paraqraph E of Lhe above referenced secrion of
i;;-a;4":--rrr""l r cannoL process your current applicaLion,until
revised plans are received. Please also refer to my earlier l-etter
dated October 19, 1994 for additional submittal requirements'
If you or Mr. Campisi have any questions, please give me a cal1.
SincerelY,
Randy
Town Planner
Jr!-i !JEI -CJ3!d u.lZ?!JJ
FHtzlenPlerceBrlner
ARCHIT€CfURE PLAIININ6 INTTRI ORS
ro: (atto1' 6vaDflr4
Enota: fu*ni{ '' frfrDrnnt')
6t*^'{ ,:J-,DnN'r /falO arbJ'
*rfu dz- T
f)* €ct'a'*^t
303 4766342 tAX 303 476 4901
I}.i;' i --'
t/
47"
DAIEI
tr'N(:
PRONE:
PACE I. OF
v&
t/.7'
Z p*czs
bO'
tooo t-tgtlsntoce toQp vAtL coLoRADo 8t 556posr oFFtcE 80x 57
rE' j r a6+9lfegE
'I'o:
F'rom:
I)ate:
Subject:
Randy Stoudm
BillPien e
t, GRFA allowed=
ExistingGRFA==
Prooosed GRIA=
I a6t9LttBt eb).-!a l,-lztl )!
lilLE copy
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT;
Bill Pierce
Randy Stouder
October 19, 1994
Campisi 250 application
Biil -
1.
,/
-{
4.
Need to confirm GRFA of existing duplex - both halves (supply red-lined version
of existing duplex - bolh halves).
GRFA allowed = 1 ,690 sq. ft. + 225 sq. ft. = 1 ,91 5 sq. ft. for #1 38
Existing GRFA = ?
Verify utilities (all) are underground.
Landscaping along Sandstone frontage is deficient. Add a couple shrubs (5
gallon) and possibly a group of trees (mix of one evergreen and two deciduous
at 6 leet high and 2 inch caliper respectively).
Need Casolor ll Subdivision Association (Owners Association) approval letter.
See Greg Hampton for this letter.
6. Title report (verify ownership).
fI
rg|ri3.d ZJ E3
Date of Application
Oate of DRB Meeting
Date ot PEC Meeting 1it necessary)
APPLTCAflON FOR ADDTTTONAL GRFA (250)
TYPE OF BEQUEST
Standard 250
Type I EHU 250
Type ll EHU 250
Type V EHU 250
rx"1f ocT 1 0 i334
A pre-application
discuss the
understood that this
GRFA. Rather, the
ilt.
;f'U,*^tr\
]:
t{
fi [:: #;lh" #il:::til'A Ff 'ffi s :ffi f ;Tff,g m$ffiffit'$ E
pt
does not assure each property an additional pSO square feet of
allows lor up to 250 square feet if the conditions set forth in
Chapter 18.57 or 18.71 of the Town of Vail code are met.
Applications for additions r this section will not be accepted unless they are complete.
This includes all information on this form as well as Design Review Board submittal
requirements.
PROJECT DESCRI
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address / /t/6-S.
Legal Description:
(L^,wtr ga^ay (r6^7d-7r) k {ft{/+
/noo.,**
'/e {7
ltl'uY
Filins c4So ffrurH /3
/brrtf
C. NAME OF APPLICANT:
Address --DdrJ)t9)#A
D. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTA
Address
E. NAME OF OWN
tt slg
Address
F. Filing Fee of 9200.00 is required at time of sub
Ar/
s7
4;t,]N#
request involving an EHU,
The following information, in addition to DRB submittal requirements, shall be required with
this submittal:
fls.
Verification that the unit has received a linal certificate of occupancy.
stamped, addressed envelopes and a separate list of adjacent property owners
and of owners of units on the same lot. This informalion is available from the
Eagle County Assessor's office.
Condominium Association approval (if applicable).
1.
#.
-r'A.
H.
4. Existing or proposed floor plans of strucUre.
Your proposalwillbe reviewed for compliance with Vait's comprehensive pran. ffiq
t#
-*
lf this application requires a separate review by any local, state or Federal agency
other than the Town of Vail, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00.
Examples of such review, may include, but are not limited to: colorado Department of
Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess
of 50% of the application fee. lf, at the applicant's request;any matter is postponed for
hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, then the entire lee for such re
-publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have significant
design, land use or other issues which may have a significant impact on the
community may require revia'rr by consultanls other than town staff. should a
determination be made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any application, the community Development Department may hire an outside
consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and this
amount shall be fonryarded to the Town by the applicant at the time he files his
application with the community Development Department. Upon completion of the
review of the application by the consultant, any of the funds fonrvardeci Oy tne applicant
for payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the consultani shall bb
returned to the applicant. Expenses incuned by the Town in excess of the amount
forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of
notification by the Town.
(\
L.r
n 6o*'Pryff*y;^t}.4hv
[z th(u
+"r(
htld*
l:rdT 1r3
a
t,i?'
d?4F81
)i'N
'gdl 1b: E3
I
'.
IUPROTE{EIIS IOE.ATTON CBRTIFICATE
sHsEr 2 aF 2
LOT A-6
Ir'r$.
I,EGAL, DES0RIPTION:
Tboee port'one of parsel rB and the^connnon Area clf caeor.ar vqirrr' a eubdLvier'on-recorded tn ihe oeftc" ;f ;h; iagre co*ntv,C.J.orado Glerk ana Record;";1;;ribeJ ""-ioir-o*i: BegJ-4.nins ara pol,'t whence *h: tst"l-"""itr"iri corn€r of eald caEolar vair rr*=:iI 1l;zs'q8.;- s ss.oe--i*"t-iii,t*,t; trrence-I[e fot]owtna fourcouraea around t'hdi.-Geglgrly hatf gg,an ;;i;r";'-iupte*, (1) s aa"31-rB:' E 4o-1o f,eet; t(z) i-se;i6.,az- w so.05-i6rt; (a) N sa.31"18" w 40_10 feeri ltt !f be,i6.cz.,f eo.os r"*i t. rhe potnt of&;gtnrring, county "i fi"ir",-st"i" of Colorado_
$
I
NoRrH jgffil_p l,,tto'
lt+6 w jA*srrt NE o*..-"nr,
tu
!*b,,v,t.
'+\
'o
\u+("
"dfbr -/
f4\k't
offiE&^i
s,ei.+w1;,('4o*
-11,6
tjt \
.9t \
\-"\$
,n?
"
.ad -/tt'l/7
";9
w
(t\
,+.\
q
$
coMM6N AR*,a
EutlDthrc .q,/ts.eH$tO
c4s4 LAK vAlL Ttr
NOTgI OUTLIAE c)F PUFLts t FALLdW6 Ar /rN6
; ( eFc.K F,csEMEN r DEBuRa ( bo€'R 46.7. , Pl,*. 1 og
FecF.FATroH ARaq.--'-'-
PAblc,Ei*
IE
e t/2.DUTLgX
h4R4 EL LFCAL t?F6c.FtPTlc'H
.-\
l5t 'o
I
\/
rltfln"
t-,,#t
Leland Leclrner P.t'.s" 235oa Bov ndFn r/ar 1 r.A rar\.,\ .\,- FAAh
t
SI{EET' I 0F 2:
IMPROVEI{ENT IOCATIOH CERIIFICATB
I.,EGAI., DESCRIPTION :
Thoee portione of Pancel 13 and the Comon Area of Caeolar VaLlr
If, a subdivieion necorded in the office of, the Eegle County'
Coloredo Clerk end Eecorden, doecrlbed as followa: Be8iilning at
a point whense ttre rooet northerly cdr'nar of sald Caaolar ValI 1[
beans N 4"25'58" E 59.0S feet diotant; thence the followlng foup
courEeq around the $ddtsrty ha.If of an exieting duplex: (1) S 39"
31-18" E 40-1O feet; (2) S 56"28'42- $I gO.0S feet; (3) H 33"
3L-L8" W 40-L0 feet; (4) N flA"?'8-42" E 30-05 feet ?o the Point bf
Begl-nning, County of Eagla, $tate of Colonado-
I hereby certlfy that thie lnprovement location certtflcete wag
prepared for Charlee and Geraldine Campiei, that it ie not a land
survey plat or lurprovaftont aurvey plat, and that it ia not to berelied upon for the eetablishnent of fenca, buildlng, oP other
future lmprovement l1nee.I further certify that the improvemante on the above describedparcel on thie daten .Tanuary 4, 1093, excaPt utilify connectiong,
are entj-rely within the boundarieB of the parcel except ae ehowp,
that there arB no encroachments upon the descrlbed prenieee by ,
inprovementg on any adjoining pr.ernlses, exeept aa indlcated, anF
t,hat there are no apparent evidence of any eesement croeelng or
burdening any part of eald parcel, Except as noted.
/-/-f 3
Date and Lechn*s5
2,, d.lzl'..,..,,.,.'^ !l
Record eaeement Infornatj.on waa resoarch€d by Lancl tif't-#;1,l,,lll$'1(luarantee Co. and the easenents lieted on Comrnlt*rni bto."'t/2bubo-s
that lie within the Eubjeet propdrty are ahown on the drawinE on
:heet 2,
According ta Firm mapplngqrithin the 100 year flood
the above deesribed Farcel does not lle
Flain of Gore Creek.
Note: Accqrding to Colorado law, you muet oommence any leEol
action bh6ed upon any defect ln thie cErbtfleate within three
years after you first discover such dofect. In no event nay any
action baeed ulon any defeet in thiE ce'rtj.ficate be comrnenced
more than ten yeare f,rom the date of certiflcatLon ahown hereon.
Lelarrcl Lechner P.L.S.23506 Box 3463, Vail, Co' (303) 949-5387
'tJ
TOWN OFVAIL f,ECEIPTNO.
/, | """*--/!. 1/-'-Z-
CHECKI MADE PAYABI-E lO IIOWN OF VAIL
0l 0m04154t)ZONINGANDADDRESSMAPS $5.00
0:0000 42415 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE $50.00
0l 00fi)42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE $36.00
0 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $32.00
01 Oc[n 42415 UNIFORMFIRECODE $36.00
01 0000 42415 NATIONAL ELECTRI CAL CO DE $30.00
01 0000 42415 OTHERCODEBOOKS
0r 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS OVM-ARS)i7.00
01w0042412 XEROXCOPIES ;0.25
ot0[r]04?412 SruDIES
0 0f,rJfJ424t2 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM $5.00
aL0n/.l/J4237l PENALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTIONS
ooffi41332 PLAN REVIEW RE-CHECK FEE t$40 PER HR.]
0 0000 42332 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
0l 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
0m041413 SIGNAPPLICATION FEE $20.00
0 0000 41413 ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE FEE I$I.OO PER SQ.F|.I
01 00cn 42440 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
01 00m4t331 PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE
01 000042371 IIWESTIGATION FEE (BUILDING)
31 000045110 TOVPARKINGFUND
0 000022@7 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPENSER FUND* 01 0000 21112 TAXABLE@4% (STATE)
* 0l 0fi)0 41010 TAXABLE @ 47a (TOWN)
01 000042371 BUILDING INVESTIGATION
OTHER
0l 0000 41330 ADDITIONALGRFA "250"tll,t/'
0r 0m041330 CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT
01 0000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION ILESS TFIAN IOO SO.FT.I ;200.00
0r 00m41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION TMORE TT]AN 1OO SQ"FT.I i500.00
U 0000 41330 SPECIALDEVELOPMENry s1.5m.o0
01000041330 s1.000.00
01 0000 41330 SPECI,AL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMINOR AMEND $200.00
01 0000 41330 SUBDIVISION
0t 0000 41330 VARIANCE $250.00
0l 0000 41330 ZONING CODEAMENDMENTS $2s0.00
0l 000041330 RE - ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER -r5
I lQ lA'L:-< Llv
-4{n f ' ttttt ,/ 11as" for //f (, SAtWr^"-Jr, B
CASHI 1cr*,^np,AA ;;',",/{//U
I
)
-rtf E'lr-l t:lF r_-_rF= I L
!*! j. scE j. l.ane*r-r_-: f.31:!-1
il:l-!. i -'1q 'i ;: ,. 1:a'" .1':
j1*',: s i. r't. + iii';iij:j
n-r-.r.,,r , :ji i.::ii ,* :r: i,]
.-.q.jtr'r i':: ,-;i,rn i.:. I l--i.:i -,-i_. { F:tr!:l
ijt,i':"'r :t' i. 'i.1--11=ir:,,1g1j .,
I .r-*r* tr.ai d
4i:i. tj-:i**ri i. f f ri!.r:lit.-:
l.:h lnt,: r,? r.i ri. -rer:,-i .i
-!-Hf;t-iF_: r,r*tj
';:'r"rr.j t- i.tl-ii: t! ,:lt. .ii i!-j1l
t:li1E ,, !.:!ft
ffrrC,r-rrr ,f. *.s i ,J
.::!::!il " tii:l
I
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN lhat the Design Review Board willbe reviewing the tollowing
application on November 2,1994 in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
1. A request for an additional 250 square feet of Gross Residential Floor Area for a fanllY
room remodel at the Campisi Residence localed at 1 146-8 Sandstone DtivelLot A?, r
Block A, Casolar Vail #13.
Applicants: Charles and Geraldine Campisi
The applications and information about the proposals are available in the zoning
administrator's office during regular office hours for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNIry DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on October 14, 1994.
jUt . -_ ,,,,,,, )t,,l,i)tl'[,
-l_J-r- Di
I toirz lq4 fsct-rlrs tsrr'rr 6l-Lr.ifki
C.+Vn/& pow,4ffi*r 2 yo /en'<"ratv--
/l/6 *Jd"l) sp p 4r\^
IOF4 E, DC^ N A*'/
I o t a --rvt /e4 rc A,t i{ V{-
g \i{*sra! i lL, 6azo>-
il4tr-56t-,b >vo^re- Dt.
bs"rruc t'14, cx< Sfvvt
{t,tI i\"/
o{Pit 4
@ ,D sofi./ ,^l , G 4r-.&pd.*yr1 q <a,
B
@
tQ
r -ftJ
t{o*L"6Foro{ sn , (uL(r*tdulraN. r-l 3>rs-
nrl*t&ul vC,C#tg ft<rt€tr sVAa
t[,'(f -t6{\ $N!& Dp , ,V At t-, eo - t14,s 7
IS.D
@ ,lo -8, y3&-5y-
/il€^, 7at-K , N,/,
br- il",h^\d8//Se 'u"
b/_.
o 6enA rt4#^J
lud2tr
// fo fr^\s-or:L
d*)f" q\A-"i il8 L,
t
I I t< Fs^o
eo. f/Bt7
4 t#ec.
-ffi,ecf-fl"
Dfd'V*
r t-A
,4,@
lle
6\_)/
@
l,-l
)l I
*Jo ,"Lsln/e,^{e rac-sd A/€/-l 14 JJae-
/ftUen rfi<e- co n Dd a,7p14nJ
1of I* / *t t r/ rs-.l \ / , l/,+r t,
/ Nb ,,ae op,a*-rd4ld6^^Al
f-o 6ox s/t/
Vntt, Q. ftas?
"f/D).&c)z- 7 = tr)
lo3{- pi
Ea4r.bLg
P**e", e.,ueP
JvlA*4-"f p Y-F"XI
5F1"4,( Lfttt> l tJ 5of8-i
StS^rp {- 4sJvlq6l&r e+,
fo,ufr Iap L/.3 - N f " 6)UL/u
il yl -)f*r F =yo / e_ b/ .
>cdfY- 6uy?a! r.luo\ Oa ,
6 l1t -&v,o rr p4"
15e>7ejro
(ut^< sVF*b vr tt-E- Pp 'tm,/f
/tn nrl,g"(-r6tn'\ \'
--'t r,\5 a , n1 7_r' \JI/q-4" "
/eY- 4 y6 .
L 5V.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREtsY GIVEN that the Design Review Board will be reviewing the following
application on Novembsr 2, 1994 in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
1. A request for an additional 250 square feet of Gross Residential Floor Area for a family
room remodel at the Gampisi Residence located at 1146-8 Sandstone Drive/Lot A-2,
Block A, Casolar Vail #13.
Applicants: Charles and Geraldine Campisi
The applications and inlormation about the proposals are available in the zoning
administrator's office during regular otfice hours for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on October 14, '1994.
" 6) coNsrRucnoN PERMITn"ffifl tc;
NOTE _ COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
olreMAY{**llt!|t 31, 1989 003899
!. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I ll lll lV V
2 OCCUPANCY GROUP ABEHIR
DIVISION 122d34
GENERAL DESCRIPTIOI{ OF wORK :
-
ELECTRIC BOILER CONVERSION TO GAS
JOBNAMF: EowELL RESID. BoILER
ulrmoness 1146 SANDSTONE Dl
ctry VAIL p6. 5-0769
) ALTERATIOI{trXI ADDITIONAL REPAIR
DWELLING UNITS
HEIGHT IN FT.
-
AC@MMODATION UNITS
-
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.TOTAL PERMIT FEES
JOE NORRIS MAY 31, 1989
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information r€quired,
completed an accurate plot plan, and stats that all the intormation provided as required is correct. I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordlnances and state
la-ws, and to build this structure according to the Town's z6ning and subttivision codss, design
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other
TUFE OF
AND THE OWNER.
OR CONTRACTOB FOR HIMSELF
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.
76L-3240
GLOW GoRE COLORAD,
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.
TELE.
NO.PERMIT Ideprtmenr of oommunity dorrolopment
TO BE FILLED OUTCOMPLETELY PRIOR TO ISSUANCEOF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
D eurLorr'rc ! pluuerNc
n elecrRtcll tr FoUNDATIoNfi MECHANTCAL n
lm
dopertment of community development
TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY PRIOR TO ISSUANCEOF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION
!tr!
!nn
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
NOTE _ COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
'i-:tir-'
PERMIT NO.
DATE
r. wPE oF CoNSTRUCT|ON lll lll lv v
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP ABEH IRM
OIVISION 122a34
GEITERAL DESCRIPTION OFWORK :
TYPE GROUP G.R,F,A. VAL
4i
,t]'
ALTERATION () AODITIONAT REPAIR
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
-
NO. FIREPLACES
INSULATION:THICKNESS R-VALLUE
ADDITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required,
completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all th€ information provided as required is correct. I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state
laws, and to buitcl this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision cod€s, design
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Towqapplicable thereto.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTBACTOR FOF HIMSELF
AND THE OWNER.
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
Ntrf E - Wltf I Vf |.EnMll llJ EC f\C,r I \rlt rJterc\>l I E
DATE 5-3\-91
NO.l.Tr?€oF@ilsrRucTloN
ZOCCUPATICY GROUP
tttn w@
ovfsror{ | 2431
tnO?l OE IYORI( :
---a
''z
'
owEl.t rNGulfJTs
-
Accort oo^ro wrs-
lGtoltTltFr.
-
No.FnEn c€s
INST'UTION: TYPE IHICTNESS F'VALLI'E
ADDMONAL PERMITS NEEDET}
Y INITIAT
I hereby acknowledge that I hatr€ read thls application, lilled out in full the informataon rcqulred,
completed an accurale plot plan, and state that all the information provided as requirecl ls correct I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinance3 and state
laws, and to build this structure according to the Townb zoning and subitivision codes, deslgn
roview approved, Unlform Building Code and other ordiqances ol tlp Town lher€to.
OF FOR HIMSELF
L-A.a:' -TT-
yrtr mnnrss /146 5^. /slE {Dr.
crw I p.-)1- plr. +??
TO$'N OF VAIL REG. NO.
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
,,",, 6 ta- Coa.e f.,fe,aJo.I+i'
TOU'N OFVAIL FEG. NO. I \6-A
roum oF vArL FEG. No.
dcprmrnt of community dcvclopment
TO AE FLITDOUTGOUPLETELYPRIORTOISSUANCEOTPEAUIi
WPEOFPERMIT
! euttotNc D pluuetHc
D Fucrntcal fl rounorrton
E/mecxrurrcel tr
-..\
75 3outh fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 479-21.38 ot 479-2139 ofllco of communlly developmanl
TO:
FROM:
DATEs
SU&TECT:
Read and acknowledged by:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VArrJ pUBLrc woRKs/coMMUNITy DEVELOPMENT
I,IARCH 15, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE
rn suumary,.ordinance No. d states that it is unlawfur for anyperson to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, aelrisor naterial , incruding trash dumpster-s, poriable toileti i"a -
workmen vehicres upon any streetl siaeiralx, atley or publicpl?ge or any portion thereof. The right-oi-way 6n aII Town ofvarl streets and.59ads is approxinately 5 ft. off pavernent.This ordinance wirl be strtitry enforc6d by the iqwn of vailPYPli.c works Department. persons found vi-otating this ordinanceln-rr be grven a 24 hour written notice to remove said material .rn the event the person so notified does not conply with th-notice within the 24 hour tiroe specified, the pultic worksDepartnent wiLl remove said mateiiat at ihe expense of personnotified. The provisions of this ordinance sUiff not beappllcable to construction, naintenance or repair projects ofany street or a1ley or any utilitles in the right-a-way.
To revLew ordinance No. 5 ln fulr, prease stop by the Town ofvail Building Department to obtain i copy. tLani< you for yourcooperation on this natter.
Re at o Pro (i.e. Contractor,owner)
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
NAME H o.^-, *-\\ Ca rr-''. -Bo\-,**
CALLEB
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM
"3Bqq
ffi*
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
JOB
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED
\ \qL 5l*r.r,..\:-\.,^. Br-,
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING {@eemc
tr INSULATION
(-.-
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
T] TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
r] ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
T] CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
Q,l6eenoveo
\_dORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR...
lool lts
Prtc toj
h-iaa
!r.t- f..
TrrrDtro. rr: rhh ?5th atd D.c-fr
'r Eo . h.r" Jllltl I' lls$lfla'
.t Lar. D.l. . Prorim l3tir-l lttat
er(',. C.flt.t !.aa
tltli$i,,*r,,..-'. d
',,^ J.. 0rr[
l!tJ'- -.---
,1., ttlorrcrl
I
-.b&lr I
I
I
rt- Lrat.dr...'. l4l0o 6.y, tt? ttFna f!.O.lor {Ol?) lir r.!a.tst ' ?ll , iaa t1t7f
.,rtn a|d'tt.- D.dr ... h.tllfifct\. r.'6rd r'tr- -lt'T t claL lr.l r-..a tatrt.riLtr!! F " r. ra |..ifr'' i;'tt 's- 'f gI0'OC
Ttl rnl o0/ l0O-
r! ih. rn t rlt J tL fitr Fat . hrl Faa t tL aa ,atrt a lb a{rd F'l' !L ?idtrtr tttr'3f I '||t
..nH rna ..lr.r*f . b. at .r.a L.Drr.., ral L rrrrfd. . ia lt ib ttt-'!"-' arr | ' t'rr'
..tl Fltrt .,,d .rnn.r ..4. th. ..4 t trt J rb ..-- ,.t' ll f.|i .d trta.r f"a'. 'l 'i ' r'
.lad.rr{r|..trlidba.rh l>.
r..'rto{ f,Acll: .ra tt.r. ,crh..a., tdr Priqrirt :o. 2, of ?h( t'oc
qu.rier 1ll4) tractioorl Fc? l.ndtt io fm lfa"frc dtgh intcrcit ir) .nd
to the l-r.t i,'rrt of Lot rnd or t.-ccl end or''Sitr lt Caa"l rt D.l loltc lI'
r rcrubdivirioo ^f loa A-7, lloct A, Li<nr lft} dllvirloo, rcsordinl to
th. ttrt rccordtd lovaber l. l97t io boot ?ll .t Prtc 514 Vril, Colorado.
.l* lr&rn .t rttt t ...i n!ib.r Srndrt.rrp tlr ivc. Yril. Colorrdo
lrx:ttl-l lrh .lr .n.t rr't !... tl, t r.art..$|. .rJ {tetr.r.n". (ltittlo Llocoia rr '' "!trr" '}Fr'
1..n6a ..ra tia ttrtrrro..n t?lttttt r.. i.t.r.aat ..a t.ra!t&t. 'hd 9'etit' rlrtr'$l 'nrl 'l! t\t
.rta!. rthl t.tL r.l.r..t rhnrhda.ta.a-iarr.rrttdall.ataFtrto,irr.frt'lP'rl.otttrttrn'rt"'{'rrtt trl
'n rna r! tk aLr. Lrt.r!r.a 9t.li '.ta. ttth tl, hairatLr.Gaa atd rr! f l.n.h'f '
llttlll; lin?OI.)l l) 1t...d tt..r'-. rlor. !.tadrad.ti' a'*trH 'ltr rht 'rturt'r|t"L
11?t16'r{ rtkr
t nr rr rt ...r-d F., h,. 11,h rrd...{r! l-.r.t A.a lL |.ra r.ttt el lbt llrtt latl ftt h|r-lf hrr htrtt'
..krlldr ana.|tr|'r.rr.irh rl-r..ran.rt alarr,L,aar.,a,ra{|'..er.r'.lrnlirt.{aFt!tolih'-ronilP"t.
6rr irrrr.ir'l...ft. th.l .!il.tr-.Jll..na.alaa.':aalr.ttoath?..?r..tnla.||.itrtllttr"'flh'9rt'rt'
.i.t.(on..r.a,..of3,da..Jr..Frf..t.r.cts{,.Dart:.i...r*...tt'r!"al''?rt"r.' rrtl'r '^ ""'artl''
rnn hr'
t.."1 r.anl l$! P.tr r^. lr.ill rull*{ttt to ltara. t.'3||. !.ll rba 'anrtt lhr "-' rh D'n|t" 'n
rottn rr
.n,,*.:rJ ^rit thrr th. .r...r. trr. rna.l'., tr.r dl |Lrr?.nd dn.t r.ar., ||tt.'ht .alt. ll,nr t'rt'
|r..rr.r ' r .n! .n.r.ilrt.., t. .a -tat !.t lr6a.t r.aut..-rita
S,rf.rr:.t 'i all Ltcclrr.rtr.tn,)i testtictivc Crrvrnan!. rnd [';e. of tP.ord.
.Lri'i. t t,r rorrrrrg urdinrncer
r!!l \l 1rp(.rty trrX.r.
l,rbi' ( ( !., De,.dr ,.f 'lrult ',1
.^{ ltr. rd,!.a b.tat.6.{ ,r.N;r.. In t,r {utl lna Fa..alL r,.-rrr"' .t th. '.|il p"l} !l tlL' r"'o^' p"t hr'
Ir,r:*.nd.'.rt'r!{r|nrilrl.61,i.,rr.t-'.iF:r..rla.lbllt.larErnf or l, 'l.rtr lht rl"r' ot 'nt P"l tl .'t'l
!t th. l'".. t..r .hrll .ia itt t^llllft A:ll' tlrlIt
'-l
t,.tINl' 7t' I r'aul'/ aun't'r 'hr'i
'Elr,l. rt.r.lvtrl lh.|"rut.lrlFr,qarhr .nlllt.urtsf .tt 3tltl.t.h.i! tr .,ttl''.h't r"ll !'' ""t\rlt\l$rfltll(,lrir{..'rrlFrrr.ttt!rftntt{tth.ti+..etlr;* h..r.nd.ndt'i :}'" l"'r't "rlrtil
P.1., ?|Pnrion llpt i '('tcnt fruit
By
rlli s.Yrlrr r
-,t! - -.. e./u-.'.-*.-' - '-.
$TAtl rrTlgalDD f I"r!'ld
C...rtd i-rrrl. I
ir.....t 'nl r^alr!.r.ot t.' rln€lr aFl Lfa.. n. Ihtr
1 l :i.i r'5 :
{)t rh.. to|.n ol Vril rnd larc. fdr lrr{}.nd
I, .ta tatn.rt't.'
lh l^ r.r.rrr utr t ! tlr.-...r a... .hr.ba rs,q t- rbr-.- (- (-*-'
frV"u
/02 *et a)
---- DOLL tla.
JATGS S. IdD(nAl.D, Jr. , Attorn,'y nt L.r.
l'lCl--- - -far f2.0ea
i.!-rr. Etl" Fttt
*.
$f
il
tr
PF
d{
B
oa:i'l
o
)a
7
7
a
:
F
*
It
|.n
l3 f,at-l
l! .A t,r
i
-.1
n
I rr. l,lrr r,. rr.., n,.
. ll rJ r*rror..t L.u, P. A. l'fn.ioll
frcfbol .1lS
Page ft0(,
,lk{ld',,
l**j,.&1lo
' ., n.r -, f).de
,\L{A JtAta cATOa
26th rrgg DcccrScr
^JATCS l|. ltc mi.l,lD, Jt., Arr.onrc,L'.t tr.iant ?rutt
iir,[ .!,... 114,;1 fg
,, ,l\ .l igEt
t /o2-q2q1
Et
|:
t
I
aa
I
,
a
I
Ft
il
F
t
it
il
E
g
e
8
d
t.'
Ii
!
a
!
E
I
il
!{
I
!ta
e!
c
( ..,.,,r.r D.d. .^. j..,.. rll$i*d rh. Fon{ r.?r.\lt\r{itlll. Ih.r,n... p.rtr,trtrr,,rrrFrt.torrlratr....ri.rurrdl tfu|..or of ,lO.OOTen .nd r.XJ / l.)0- -----__---qrL!Al!." :'- -'" ra'r- r1 rr'. rrrrr Dar( rh h-rd r.'d bv rh. ra,d Frrt of r. .-odraar. rri. .r<ur ,rr.,.cr - tarrr,
'/ j
" "{ ''i : r' r 'er rroFd hr r 661.4 r...LJd.a, -ra a.ra .cr.q.a. .nd bt rraaf, t .rnt. do.. tr.rt, barFrr.I n/rrr unl. ahr..rd t.rt, 1l ilF -..ia F.t. ht, ,!r,ri t^{ .rrrfrr ,or.vo. ,ll lh.,cllertnf..r.r.,ndi,,,p....i oflrna.r,ti.r(..tr|narndtr,narnrhr
"'^ .'! t-ACLr .n.t s|... dc.to...to t.,,r priority Io. !, of thc hGqulrt.r {l/4) Fr6cr ionrl Fce T.n.nt iD Colon l/l faa rirrle iacarart in andto thr llerr l'nit of Lot rrrd or P.rc.l and Ot Sit. lt G.loirr t.l lorta lI,r rcrubdivicion of Lor A-7, slr,ct A, Lionr litga .ubdlaiaion, rccordinj toth*. plot rccorded !tov!rb. r l, l97E in book 177 rt palr t24 Vril, Cotorido.
. r.r.;r,i.,,,.r,, I4?00 S,lJ. 2[ Stro€t (t.O.f,or 4Ol7) princcto.r, Ftoridr ]317t
JrtXlS td. HcmlAl,D, Jt, , At r orncy rt Ltr,
P A P"nrito tat ircnt ltutt
rr3All
r, t., ..' ./
tllr :., DOtllL:), Trurr."
\r \Tr
'
rrriliLti, Fl,,ri4. I
I o.l().r :ladr
f|\?'ra,,rr'n.rrrrb.L.rr..ln .:.darn|./... n.rh.
. .\,t .. .,r{: il , .
s.nd.i on. Drivo, Vril, Colorrdo
llxtrl|lll'rh,il .r -i .r,r^' t'i. n.rr-t,tl-ir..ra attr.i.n.n(r. rh.r.(o t r.ntrna. !r .r../rFrrr.i.t, It r'1 . .hr,,r,;r.-n. r.6.rid.r.d.?..trd.?. r.r,r )..{,r rnd 9r,,fttr rh.?_a:.nd alt tLl.r.r.. '.arrr r , tr.r..l l.,a.,.td.n.!,/.tr.tra,.yotthrr..dr..rr,ttlit.rrt,,.rr.,trfb?Inl.r,r?nst!. ,l,.rr,.i..!".r.,f.rr.,.rdtr.n.r.rrrhrh.h.,..ltrrr.rt.and.rro.trnan(?r
tr,}l tl l r\lrlrrllrtLlr.),"-r,ttr.r,*.alorrbarlr,tnaa.rad.qhlr<t,rrrtrrh..9trr!rn.n.r..gnr.thr.r,o
l r. r.! n : r.rr h,r r..rr .nd .,rJt^. ro..r.r Aia tL ..!d t rrr o, th. ,r?rt ,[rr. ,or h|.ru hr. n.r.r.
,.-. .o,.^.nr r..t t .||tr, aaa rr?a. ia rnd,trh rh...ara Frr,,t I hr Fora rrartht.,.'., .r,:r,i..tt}rr....rhn,.raaatrr.,,orii._Fri..i..Lrr.alFrt.a.t!t.prvrrr.
afi!' " I r' 4r Fii 'l !Lr' F.t*t. .h-rul. .i{ ridr*ra.lL ..a.r. ol riLfiraa<.. ri t.r, .n fra .rrrtle..nJ |taraq{ . t , . r.llr .xrt r:rr i. trr.t bartt r, r.I .id rerv., th. .._ t. ..nh,r .nd to., .t
'lrtt'f r ' -1 1n. '.,.'.i t'. a.d a^n.r.ar troa a! taai.? an{ oata. lrrnr.. tarjFrar. rarr. lr.|ir, rar.a
.r,4 rr, .rnh.r,'.'. Jf rhar.r.? lrnaor tlrra-r.,Subi..ct to Jll D,'. Irrir ion of n€rtrictice Cov.ntnt. and [tr.r of racord.
Srrl'i.ci lLr r,)oin8 {r.trn..rcei ,)f tl,c t oen of V.il .nd trrc. for 1960 .ndr-{l pr.iprrlv t arcr,
Sub i,,, I t. lrr., J,r l)l T.tlct o! r?,-ord.
n, , rri "..t o..r:,,.. .. ih. _.Jrt ..d F.._La F.&..8 n ,, !h. .ri F.r, of th. x.oFd r.rr, lrr
f ''r'!"lr"r 'rtirn.t.rl .nlt t\.tt Ft'4 rr rarrn.)adtalt t.rhrnlo?!r{tr|naha.lroLorairFrrtiaf-trr, ,. | !.,,, ,.f (| , l.,r: r..r .i.I .n.t r,tt tall^I? axl! l(rtLt.f,.t t f,7BrD ft. .rn3rr., .u.a., a.{'r'!'.",r,,,.irt!|tr,..j,h.r,,lrji..arnrt.s-.tanrF.a.,rn.rtn.t$.aU.r..ttar.alrr.
l\ tt,\l.iF rlla} l 'rr rri,r {rrr otrn,trrr. r.rr trrr h.?rsi ru er hx, i.na .nir !.t t h. i.r .nd t..r 6..t
trlrtl
Irr/lr.t
lr'th
l.,
tf L ttl..
l :'"
.. +-,i+*lr
eL rtn 2,J&.u
nlD
l. lt
talil r. 'ttr'' All;
. rlAl,l i ;.' :ArfijL:l;l"
t ll' !1tr
' :lilN .ln L , iv141p I ta l{ ' h '
-rr.r -irr- iY. ^:r.,:\tritr 4't ''rfi-'lt lT''s1.'. "
.]'"*ri' ,^".. .-. .t*-t' .'crlrr ,ltr"'"sl ' f,ri '; :'t!'
tt:r}'-. 1 -{'.. I i .rE. li. rt tr"rrd, :r ' ' At't F-te:
;.'-'..:€t,t .':' l'r't!Pnr i\^rst ' l.'" r' tdl 'i'rr:
clr-- t'*+.s't-tr.
I ll l\r, \t t!l' 2
rli. . .{fl.ri& ,,
., , 21,'7r.d3#.-,
tir 'iy2/'lln 4.-/ v Ji r- v..,-
'lt; *-, rn r--'inart rrt'{l*.
, t E . .r'|'
trn..tr{i, !'l.r . !r r.1 l.
r-rr: f! rlrt r ttrJ tn' 4 'l lir_rr'i]t :in:!!l: ltl l:
|; . ,rt ,:. . "rr> ttar":9,.a.,
r1 ,l{,
b ' . -'l
:'\i lr;t- (.rAIl. I i, r t'b.t!;i. '15: r 'l 'r' ;l-?'
! ,.'r illlt.i ''. "!t pl,lt r'''rllrir': \i"\'ill' l i '
-t.' , : ''r. '. tr:-, .rr- (,'int'-''f -|'i i '')f -
redr)rd' nrrr-rdl
i .' , 1: , L.. f" -rr r'l " t{ tdjo::l' l(x i'!?'l l^r' ill)l!: u1 i J81)'
.tirrL::'- 1^{ t-glrirII\JI,:". lqrq
r'..'.r..{ _retr.it ' rr'aL' rdr b'e (*'Lr"tl'|l -'i r}
',i'4/;t /
Ll,0AL DI
* (_=( e{4
0lrt)t-R Nuli8fR:
ADDRTSS :
BACKGROUND:
I NS TR.
,(L
A''4"\-
NAt.lt:
: I HIST.
UPDATE FICHE DATE:
RECEPT. BK. !ECr.PE.._BooK DAIE1
RT, OF FIRST REFtlbFTlirr rlr.qils.
_.N0-
J'IQ"
NO
DATE . Br)OK
BTGIIORINIOTT
/a3
nIr4ARr.s
'z
FI RST
s/
FROM REMARKS
,4
| f,.l
r-__i_