HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VALLEY FILING 3 LOT 3 SEE WARNER SDD FILE LEGALoz
E
=&tuo-
\'
F{
.n
o
IJJ
IU
lJ-
tr
=g,tlj
o-
<6/221, 4
st zL6 #l<c (\
o\o\
o\c'l
I
E
zz
E
Ffr
u
Ef
<tr]
^z=zE<OFI(JA7.,1>-
$r
UJF
F
t-L
==
=z
o
u.lF
z
oz
Ildt
cd
ozz
uJIFoz
(r).|f.n
(9@zH
tr4 F- OO-r(Jo@&XO(Joc)
dHo&<,p{trr
H
if
z
Fr
l!J
UJo
=
!cot!
o
E
o)E
g
.o6
.9
o-\*
c.'BF
o.c
;R
H(U'
E
o
o't
o
lCc
G
oEoo
CDc
=o
E
o
=l
oo
o
o.o.(!
]
.g
qt
o)
ll,oE
.rio
oo
c
.9p't
i6
o
!
(g
ctt
'd
N
-oc
'oF
o.c
o
o)
€
o()o6
(D
()
a,
.9
:=
E
6
a
'G
(l)
G
6
o
o
0,o
6c
ol
3oF
(l'
't
Eoo
o
6
o,
o
o-
E
l!
(!
E
o
(D
=
=
o.
E
o
o
IDo
o)(!
e
o
o
.9o
E
ct
E
oooop
o
o.
o
(E
E
o
;
(rl
(u
c,
$o
(E
is
o
CL
E
oo6
(E
oo
-9o.
Eoo
!
c,
'=
ct
o
6
E
o
.g
oE
.s
Jo
Eg
F(!
.9
o-
CL
G
.o
(!
o
6.c
6E
o
ctEq)
'o
Io
G
l!()
o
'J]€o N o rn
.if
t
uJ
z
o
Y
IJJ
oz
q
=Foul
llJ
oz
co
=
c
z
I
C)ru
=
UJ
IIJ
z
EuJ
.UG
3!!
uJ
z
-o
UJo
F
oo-
uJo
i
UJJ
x
F
!u
U'l
.t>
UJ
uJlt
E
=G
IJJ
o-
J
FoF
z
J
o
c,
IJJ
uJ
z
16
=J
J
=I(,
UJ-
E-.r
ts
NO|IVn]VA (J
!.rt>
=irxa
=F
E*8il
3r'r
-rts
EF
aE
.(,
6l
(\l
zz99F^q,--A 6
.nO1>E9xsv=g8
FOjoj
>E
= 11,
=ao
l=loIHIFt<lFl
Elz
lq
tg
l3l'
lc)t(/llHIFti
IX
F
E-t
aJ)
HXr
EAl'{
!"Et4
r
Fl<E
FJf-\
Fh
pr
tr\
n
P
z
tr
J
t!
CE
o"
gJ
o
\T
FIa
-
lu
-z
Eo
z
tr
u,l
=UJz
qtFzlzOa
koo<
5H
xt!bo<z
F
2..
9=
=FdoBtrOI
l
t1
il
t"ltoltoltdl
t!l
a
(!
a
uJzYo
IF
uJo,
F
2o
F
J
oz
I
z-z
I
JJ-
F
uJ
o
3
3l
,_l
zl
.. >lo
uJo
uJ
UJzot
ttl
)
z
E zFa
J
@
I&
o.
-$
LOOO
olurlq
I
I
cil
z,|
ollul
1l
=lttlol
zl
d
I
I
.l
=,|ol
uJltrl
ilLIol
Pl r
zHF
..d
I
I
I
I
dlzl
glil
altn
3i*l;\.,|
zl
FI
I
I
.Iot
z,|
OIutlEl
JI<l>l
clEI.,I
HIFllJI<l>l
I
Fl'H
(,z
tr
co
I
5
F
CO\a
X
TJJ
oo)-
=
Fl
H
(J
}JH
u;
=z
z
6
=
d
oF
C)
EFzoo
z
T
Lu
=
u,IF
E
-rO<FG()
LlJ <zgt! l-o6
C)
C.l(
o\
@e.l
I
t
z
2
IIJF
o
vtz
Flpr
F
uJ
tsoooazo
Fo-l!Y
UJ
.o
oF
F
E
uJ
o-
tto
o-oo
uJFoz
FI
H
z^
.nY Q
=k ffd)o t
=z^=o 6(Ll! .s
dff
2"r=
=qE6il=
Dd r-r r---IX]LIL I
trtrD
=
=uJ
59E<a36U'ne,E9tt ir
Ed
=>.=uJ:-E r-=R :C-o-uJ: >o-: O|!E ooI EurE XO-t x>t q-o -':!tr
uJ
d)
F
-I
-
E
=E
lrJo-z9F()
:)EFazoo
,
ffirs JUN
t
June 1, 1992
TO t^lHOl'l IT IvtAY CONCERN:
' Vail Racquet CIub Condominiums Associatl.on'
Inc. permission to qomolete the re-roofirig
Thank you.
I 1992
. does giv#Gtt" g noefiag I t
l
of Build #6r
APPLTCATION FOR REVOCABLE
A STRUCTURE ON A
(Please tlpe or Print)
DATE
OWNER
PERMIT TO ERECT OR I{ATNTAIN
PUBI.,IC RIGHT-OF-WAY
Fence
WallLandscapingg-
Other
OF PROPERTY Warner Developments. Inc.
NAIIIE OF APPLICANT Robert l,larner. Jr.
ADDRESS 1815 Sunburst. Vai1. Colorado 81657
I..EGAL DESCRIPIION OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED:
Irl 3 BI,CK SUBDMSION Vail Va1ley rhird Filing
(If necessary, attach description on seParate sheet) -
Corner lot Inside lot x
DESCRTPfTON OF STRUCTURE OR rTEM(S) INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY: !S993P.ins-
attiCh ptans showing encroachment' property line' sidehtalks,
curbs, intakes, hydrants, meters, nanholes, dDY other affected
appurtenance in the project area (to scale or dimensioned) and
section(s) as ete]l as elevations (if applicable).
Does structure presentlY exist?No
Proposed date for counencement of construction September. 1991
fn consideration of the issuance of a revocable perrnit for the
structure above indicated, applicant agrees as follows:
1. That the structure herein authorized on a revocable pernit
basis is restricted exclusively to the land above described.
2. That ttre perrnit is lirnited specifically to the tlpe of
structure described in this application.
3. That the appJ-icant shall notify the Town Manger, or his.duly
authorized-igent, twenty-four hours in advance of the time
for cornrnencement of construction, in order that proper
inspection may be made bY the Town.
4. The-appticant agrees to indemnify and hold harnless the Town
of vaii, its ofiicers, enployees and agents fron-and against
alt tiabitity, claims and demands on account of injurlt, -lossor damage, including without lirnitation clains arising from
bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death'
propelty ioss oi darnage, or any other loss of any kind
inaLsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner
connected with applicantrs activities pursuant to this
perrnit, if such iniury, 'loss, or damage ls.caused in whole'or in part by, or is Liaimed to be caused in whole or in
part by, the act, omission, error, professional error,
iistaXl, negligence or other fautt of the applicant, his
contractor or subcontractor or any officer, ernployee or
representative of the applicant, Lis contractor or his
subcontractor. the applicant agrees to investigate, handle
respond to, and to prilitiae defense for and defend against'
any such liability' claims,.or demands at the sole expense
of-the applicant. The applicant also agrees to bear all
other ex!-enses relating Lhereto, including.court costs and
attorney-rs fees, whetti6r or not any such liability'-cLaims,
or dernairds alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent'
Applicant agrees to procure and naintain, at its own cost, apolicy or policies of insurance sufficient to ensure against
all liability clains, denands and other obtigatlons assu:ned
by the applicant pursuant to this ParagraPh 4.
AppJ.icants further agree to release the Town of VaiI, its
ofiicers, agents and employees frorn any and all llabillty,
clains, dernands, or actions or causes of actions whatsoever
arislng out of any damage, loss or 5-nJury to the appllcantor to the applicantts property caused by the Town of VaiI,
its officers, agents and enployees while engaged Ln
naintenance or snolr renoval activities or any otheractivities wtratsoever on Town of Vail property, streets,
sidewalks, or rights-of-waY.5. That the per:mit rnay be revoked whenever it is determined
that the encroachnent, obstruction, or other structure
5.
7.
constitutes a nuisance, destroys or inpairs the use of'the
right-of-way by the public, constitutes a traffic hazard, or
th- property upon shich the encroach:nent, obstnrction, or
strultuie exisls is reguired for use by the pubLic; or it
nay be revoked at any tine for any reason deened sufficient
by the Town of Vail.
That the applicant sill renove, at his expense, the
encroachment, obstruction, or structure within ten days
after receiving notice of any revocation of said petmit.
That the applicant agrees to maintain any Landscaping
associated with the encroachment on the right-of-way.
8. That in the event said removal of the encroachnent,
obstruction, or structure is not accomplished within ten
days, the lown is hereby authorized to remove salne and lrave
the right to rnake an assessrnent against the property and
collect the costs or removal in the Eane Danner as general
taxes are collected.
That the applicant tras read and understands all of the terns
and conditions set forth in this application.
Special conditions:
9.
10.
APPROVED:
Direct y DeveloPDent
ot Publi
Manager
works
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVISION
JOB NAME
rcr R BLocK FTLTNG Uz 3Z
ADDRESs , : S^ / -:
The location of utilities, whether they be main trunk lines orproposed lines, must be approved and verified by the followingutilities for the acconpanying site plan.
Authorized Siqnature Date
7-/A4/
U.S. West Cornmunications
1-8 00-92 2 -1_987
468-6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
949-578L
Gary Hall
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
949-5A92
Ted Husky/Michaet Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.v.
949-553 0
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Va1ley Water
& Sanitation District *
47 6-7 480
Fred Haslee
?-/4 -?/
?-/7-?/
?-t z-qr
?{7-q /
NOTE:These verifications do not relieve the contractor of
his responsibility to obtain a street cut pennit fromthe Toern of Vail, Department of Public Works and to
obtain utilitv locations before diqqinq in any public
right-of-way or easernent in the Town of Vail . A
buildincr pernit is not a street cut permit. A streetcut perrnit must be obtained separately.
This form is to verify service availability andlocation. This should, be used in conjunction withpreparing your utility plan and scheduling
installations.
* Please bring a slte plan when obtainlng Upper Eagle Valley
Water & Sanitation signatures.
t-o,l
()
o
o
\
I
I
L
-...---- t- .
\r.
l-
,--_.-.. €
}L:i- J
:l i
||.
rl
t. i
't't\
ITJ
n-
A
'.,
4
,/l
,l*
II/
c.l
F
\J-l
tl
,
t-
I
IF
I
i:,.: -'
?
-{ {\
75 south frontrge road
Y8ll, colorsdo 81657
(303) 4792138
(303) 47$'2139
otfice ol communlly development
April25, 1991
Bob Wamer
Warner Development
P.O. Box 958
Avon, CO 81620
Re: Construction on Lots 3, 4 and 5, Vail Valley 3rd Filing
Dear Bob:
Attached is a copy ol a letter submitted to the Town by Abe Shapiro, an adjacent property
owner, regarding the above lots. After speaking with Dan Stanek, a Town Building Inspector, I
understand that the landscaping of the mentioned area is to be completed by June 1, 1991,
as per the T.C.O. for Lot 4. I leel that the construction ac@ss road, which crosses Lot 3,
should also be revegetated at this time.
Please contact me should there be any problems with meeting the June 1 landscaping
deadline for revegetiation.
Thank you,
6'9A-,
Shelly Mello I
Town Planner
lab
Lsct, aa:
or,oeo-4,a'c)E
N
,(
1.6
t$
\
tao
-l
75 south lronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138
(303) 4792139
October 27. L989
oftice of communily development
Mr. Jim Junge
4141- Arapahoe AvenueBoulder, Colorado 80303
Re: Special Developrnent District for Lots 3, 4, & 5, Vail Valley ThirdFiling, a Resubdivision of a part of Sunburst
Dear Jirn,
On behalf of the Town of Vail Community Development Departrnent, I amwriting to confirm for you that lots 3, 4, & 5, VaiI Valley ThirdFi) irrg, a resubdivision of a part of Sunburst are platted lotsaccording to our zoning map.
In respect to your guestion concerning a Special Developrnent Districtfor these three lots, the staff at this time can find no reason tosupport applying Special Development District zoning to these threelot.s. The purpose of a Special Development District is:
J.8.40.001 Purpose.
The purpose of the Special Developrnent District is to
encouraqie flexibility and creativity in the developmentof land in order to promote its most appropriate use; toimprove the dcslgn character and quality of new
development within the Tcwni to facilitate the adequate
and econornical provision of streets and utilities; topreserve the natural and scenic features of open spaceareasi and to further the overal'l goals cf the comnuni.tyas stated in the VaiI Conprehensive Plan...
Our understanding of your request is that the main purpose for theSpecial Development District is to increase the GRFA and site coveragefor Lot 4 by deducting GRFA and slte coverage for the other two lots.fn^our opinion, this request has no relationship to good site planningwhich is based on developrnent Oeing related to the size of the lot.Cther alternatives to accongrlish Lhe sanne objective rrhich would relatethe development to the size of the lot would be to request a minor
.!
subdivision. You wourd subdivide the lot so that the correspondingdevelopment you wish to have for each rot rerates to the rot size. youcould also propose to remove a lot rine and combine thro of theproperties to get the size of house your o$rner wishes.
It i? arso irnportant to note that these three lots are in moderatedebris hazard, severe rockfall hazard, and perhaps a possibLe avalancheinfluence zone. The possibre avalanche infruence zonl is sornewhatdifficult to deterrnine due to the configuration of the road on ourzoning map versus the avalanche map.
ff you have any questions aboutfeeL free to call me.
Sincerely,\) I o I
flttrlnn [fti+
Kristan PritzSenior PLanner
KP: Ir
cc: Peter Patten
our opinion on your proposal, please
o
trl>{
lnwn
3rl' S
U V.a0L? 3n!-
L. Two copies of a stamped topographic survey of the three
Iots - to be submitted A.S.A.P.
2. Completed Design Review Board applications - to be
proviaea at the March 7th rneeting'
3. A prelirninary title report - to be subrnitted a minirnum
of two weeks prior to iinal Design Review Board
meeting.
4 Completion of the utility verification forrn and
location of utility service on the project site plan -
to be subnitted a ininirnurn of two weeks prior to the
final Design Review Board hearing'
5. Roof plans of each structure showing finished roof
elevations - to be submitted A's'A'P'
6. A revised site plan indicating heights of the proposed
retaining walls.
7. Cornplete elevations of the proposed structures - to be
submitted at the March 7th Oesign Review Board rneeting'
75 south hontrge roed
vrll, colorudo 81657
(303) 47$'2138
(3{13} 47$'2139
olllce of communlty development
Marqh 1, 1990
Mr. GIen Magee
Junge Reich l4agee
4l-41 Arapahoe Ave.
Boulder, CO 80303
Dear Glen:
EnclosedyouwillfindapplicationmaterialfortheDesignReview
of the warner project. iir addition, the following list
="rtoiiir"" o.rt-diScussion of February 28th regarding additional
subrnittal material:
i\As we discussed, I will need additional infornation on the snow
avalanche and geologic trazards affecting these lots. I have
enclosed a copy of fhe Townrs hazard ordinances and highlighted
sections pertiirent to this request. To summarize, we will need a
written slatement frorn a quatiriea engineer statJ.ng that the
proposed developnent will not increase the hazards of rockfall
ind-debris fall on adjacent lots and R.o.!l. In addition, the two
lots affected by snow avalanche will require rnitigation.
Ideally, I woul& Iike assurances that any required nitigatiol cal
Ue acc6lnpllshed through the design of the structure, ald will not
reguire Lhe construction of large berns on the south side of the
l-ots.
Thank you for your response to these reguest. I look forward to
seeing-you on ilednesaay for the Design Review Board rneeting'
SincereJ.y,
tB/pp
Enclosures
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Planning and Environnental Commission
Coruuunity Developnent Departnent
ltarch L2, 1990
A request to rezone property fron Primary/Secondary to
a Special Developncnt Dletrlct for Iots 3, 4, and 5,Vail Valley third fillng, part of replat of Sunburst.Applicant: Debra and Robert l{arner, itr.
I. DESCRTPTION OF THE REOUEST
This application is to rezone three undeveloped
Prirnary/Secondary tots to a Special Development District.
Development proposed for the SDD includes three
Prirnaryr/Secondary structures. The purpose of this requestis to pernit GRFA on one of the 3 lots (Lot 4) to exceedthat which is permitted under existing zoning. fn addition,site coverage on thl.s same lot is also in excess of what ispermitted under existing zoning.
t{ith the exception of increases in GRFA and site coverage tolot 4, the development proposed by the sDD is consistentwith the underlying Prinary,/Secondary zoning. Setbacks,building heights and parking are all consistent with
Prinaryr/Secondary development standards. The following
tabLe sumnarizes the development proposed for these threelots.
PermittedParcel Perrnitted Proposed GRFA SiteSize GRFA GRFA +/- Coveraqe
Proposed SiteSite coverageCoverage +/-
Lot
Lot
Lot
?.L5,364
15, 641
3 r786
3 t9I4
3,300 -486
5,500 +1.r 586
3,073
3,328
2,595
3,726
-378
+398
L5,967 3,846 3,550 -296 3, 193 2,878 -315
TOTAI,S:11,546 L2,35O +804 9,594 9,299 -295
As indicated by this table, proposed developnent on lots 3
and 5 is below GRFA pernitted under existing zoning by 782'
square feet. Lot 4 development exceeds pernitted GRFA by
1585 square feet. Collectively, proposed developnent on the
three lots would exceed the total allowable GRFA by 804
square feet. Site coverage on Lot 4 exceeds permitted site
coverage by 398 square feet. Collectively, all three lots
are 291 square feet below perrnitted site coveralte.
Each of the three lots will be developed with a snall
secondary unit. The applicant has agreed to enter into arestriction aftreenent with the Eown so that these units will
not be subdivided and sold off as would be pemitted by
existing zoning.
Two sets of criteria are to be used in evaluatl.ng a rezoning
request of this type. The firEt of these are 3 criteria
designed to evaluate the approprJ.ateness of the zone change.
Secondly, the Special Development Dlstrict zoning includes
nine design criteria. Ehese nine criteria address specific
issues relative to the proposed SDD.
II. CRTTERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL
A. Evaluation of the Recruest:
1. SuitabilltM
It is important to understand the purpoEe of Special
Development District Zoning when evaluating the
appropriateness of this request. As stated in the
zoning code, the purpose of SDDs is to:
18.40.010 PurDose:
The purpose of the Special Development District is
to encourage flexibillty and creativity in the
development of tand ln order to pronote its most
appropriate usei to improve the design character
and quality of new developnent within the Town; to
facititate the adeguate and econonic provisions of
streets and utllities; to preserve the natural and
scenic features of open space areasi and to
further the overall goals of the conmunity as
stated in the VaiI Conprehensive Plan. An
approved developnent plan for a Special
Developnent District, in conjunction with the
properties underLying zone district, shall
establish the reguirenents for guiding development
and uses of property included in the Special
Development District. The elements in the
development plan shall be as outlined in Section
18.40. 060.
As stated, the intent of this zoning request is to
permit developurent on one of the lots to exceed what is
pernitted by existlng zonJ.ng. This purpose iE not
Lonsistent with the overall purpose of the SpecJ-al
Developrnent District. With the exception of GRFA,
there is nothl-ng about this proposed developnent plan
that could not be accomplished under existing zoning.
l{hile sDDrs have been proposed and approved for many
different reasons, they have generally not been used
sinply as a tool to allow for density increases with no
public purpose as described in 18.40.010.
2.
nunicipaL objectives.
The residentlal use proposed by the sDD is identical to
what is permLtted under existing zoning. tlhile thisproposal is generally consistent with rnunicipalobjectives, the rezoning is no nore consistent than
what would be acconplished by the properties existing
zoning.
3. Does the rezoning orovide for the growth of anorderlv, viabLe conmunitv.
The proposed rezoning will not further the growth of anorderly, vlable community. If approved, this rezoning
could represent the gradual deterioratj-on of Vailrs low
density residential neighborhoods. one nay considerthis reguest and conclude that the uses and development
are generally consistent with what is permitted underexisting zoning. However, it is important to
understand that zoning in Vail has been adopted in
order to establish consistency between neighborhoods.
The amount of GRFA allocated to a lot has a direct
relationship to the size of the lot. the proposal
conflicts with this basic principle of zoning for the
Town of Vail. In order to preserve the overall fabricof these areas, it is irnportant to naintain theintegrity of the existing zoning. This proposal, byvirtue of its deviations from the development standardsof the underlying zonLng, is inconsistent with thiscriteria.
III.
A. Desian conpatibility and sensitivitv to the imnrediate
environrnent, neiqhborhood and adiacent Bropertiesrelative to the architectural desiqn, scale. bulk,
buitding heioht. buffer zones, ldentitv. character,visual intearitlland orientation.
This proposal is generally consistent with thiscriteria. tlhile the level of developrnent on Lot 4greatly exceeds allowable GRFA, the design of this
structure is sensitive to nininizing bulk and Dass.
Each of the three structures are in cornpllance with
Prirnaryr/Secondary height and setback reguirenents.
DeveJ-opnent on lot 4 does, however, exceed permltted
site coverage by 398 square feet and GRFA by 804 square
feet.
B.
uses and activitv.
Uses proposed for these three sites are consistent withthe surrounding neighborhood and the Prinraryr/Secondary
zone district.
c. Compliance with parking and loadinq recruirenents as
outlined in Chapter 18.52.
This project is consistent with the Townrs parking
requirements.
D. Conformitv with applicable elements of the Vail
cornprehensive PIan. Town policies and Urban Desiqn
Plans.
The goal 5.5 of the Land Use Plan rrencourages the
development of enployee trousing at various sites
throughout the cornmunityrr. The appticantrs connitnentto restrict the subdivision and resale of each of the
three secondary units is a positive step towards
providing ernployee units. In order to fully conplywith this goal , deed restrictions liniting the use of
these secondary units to long terur enployee rentals
should be established.
E. fdentification and rnitiqation of natural and/orgeoloqic hazards that affect the property on which the
Special Developurent District is proposed.
A site specific analysis of these properties has been
courpleted. Lots 3, 4, and 5 are located in rnoderate
debris flow and rock fal-l zones. Lots 3 and 4 are
located in a noderate snow avalanche zone. The Townrs
hazard ordinance requires nitigation of the snow
avalanche hazard. Mitigation is not reguired for
development on the lots inpacted by rockfall and debris
flow hazards. Hohrever, this developnent nust be donein a way tbat does lgE increase the degree of lrazard on
adjacent property or Town Rights-of-way.
A geologic hazard analysis of the proposed site plan
has been cornpleted. AtI hazards can be nitigated bystructural reinforcement of the proposed residences.
Subject to the removal and/or redesign of proposed
Iandscape walls along Sunburst Drive, this developnentwill not increase the degree of hazards on adjacent
lots or town rights-of waY.
Site Plan, Buildino desiqn and location and open space
rrovisions desicrned to produce a functional developnent
responsive and sensitive to natural features.
veoetatlon and overall aesthetlc qualitv of the
F.
conurunity.
The proposed developrnent plan is consLstent with ttrese
considerations.
A circulatlon svstern desiqned for both vehicles and
pedestrians addressincr on and off-site trafflc
circulation.
Each of the three units have been designed with two
driveways, resulting in 5 driveways over approxinate).y
290 feet. Six driveways to serve three lots is
unnecessary and decreases the amount of area that coul'd
be dedicated to landscaping.
Functional and aesthetic landscapinq and open space in
order to optimize and oreserve natural features,
recreation, views and function.
The proposed open space and landscaping ls consistent
with what is typically found in erinary,/Secondary
development.
A phasing plan has not been proposed as a part of this
SDD.
rV. STAFF RECO},IMENDATION
Staff recornmendation for this reguest is denial . The
proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the purpgse of ttte
speliaf Developn-nt District and is also inconsistent with
the three criterj.a used to evaluate rezoning proposals.
The development standards established by the Townrs zoning
ordinance are in place for a reason. These development
standards are the primary tool used to ensure proper and
orderly development throughout the Town. With the
exception of GRFA and site coveragte on L,ot 4, this
developnent proposal does not deviate from established
devel.oprnent ltandards. Hor,rever, that is not justification
to grant this request.
G.
H.
Phasincr plan or subdivision plan that will naintain a
workable, functional and efficient relatlonship
throucrhout the develonment of the Special DevelopmentDistrict.
I.
Special Development District zoning has been approved by the
Town council 23 tines. Each of these rezonings have
occurred for specific reasons relative to the development
proposed for these sites. Reasons for SDDs have relateddirectly to the purpose of an SDD (as stated before):
1. To encourage flexibitity and creativity in the
developnent of land in order to promote its nost
appropriate use.
2. To improve the design character and quality of new
development within the Town.
3. To facilitate the adequate and economic provision ofstreets and utilities.
4. To preserve the natural and scenic features of open
space.
5. To further the overall goals of the conmunity as statedin the comprehensive plan.
This SDD is proposed solely to satisfy the needs of the
applicant, with little to no benefit to the connunity. In
essence, the sDD process is being utilized to achieve a densityvariance. The staff encourages the Planning Connission to
recommend to the Tonn council to preserve tbe integrity of theexisting zoning and the SDD process by denying this application.
Vail , and Avon, and their surrounding areas. A full-tine employee is
person who works an average of thirty (30) hour:: per week'
3.Therestrictedemployeedwellingunitshallnotbedivided
intoanyforrnoftirneshares,intenralownershi;r,orfractionalfee
ownership.
The provisions hereof nay be enforced by the owner and
The conditions, restrictions, stipu)-a'3ions' and agreernents
herein shaLl not be waived, abandoned, terminated, or '
except by the wrLtten consent of both the Town of Vail and the
the subject ProPertY-
ACKNOI{LEDGMENT
I
)
the4.
Toltn.
5.
contained
anended,
owner of
:"n;t,'i; ""mixlaua:biita"'"'n'"
:lI
Notary PubIic !.t
o
My conmission exPires:
PROPERTY O9INER
IIARNER DEVELOPUENTS, INC.
President
ACKNOWI,EDGED
day
of
44AAA7 B-55rA tr_7e8 g4/@1/9t 14 r 39 PGEOFz
Val1 ValleY 3ril Pi.ltng
County, Colorado
1g tne owner of tlre property
" "'JftL)
//-
,*'03
fp RESTRIqIIVE COVENAMTS
T{IIEREAS,
described as:
WARNER
Lot3r
Eagle
446A67 B-55G. p-7e8
JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS
a4l6r/91 14'.59
EA6LE ioururv CLERR'
PGlOFE
COLORADT]
REC
1S. oo
DOC
o. os
hereinreferredtoasthe||subjectproperty|!;and
I|HEREAS, the owner wlshei to place certaLn restrLctions on the use
ofthesubJectlandforthebenefltoftheownerandtheTownofvail'
Colorado (ttthe Townr) .
No!{' THEREFoRE, the owner does hereby impcse, establish,
acknowledge, declare, for the benefit of all persons who may
hereinafter purchase' or lease, or hold the subJect land, the foltowing
restrictions, covenants, and conditl.ons, all of which shall be deemed
to run with the land and lnure. to the benefit and be bindJ.ng upon the
owner, its respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
1. The subJect property has a restricted enployee dwelling unit
in the approximate size of @. ( 6001 ) square feet'
The restricted enployee unit located on the subJect.property shpll not
be sold, transf,erred, or conveyed separately f,ron the prinary dwellJ'ng
unit located on the subject property for a per5.od of nore than twenty
(20)yearsandthell.feof,tiffany.l@wenthal,fromthedatetlratttre
certifLcate of oceupancy is issued..for said restricted employee
tdwel1ing unit' //f
2. The restricted enplovee dwellins unit shal YlZ{::sed' or
rented for any period of lees than thirty (3o) consecutlvey' aia' tf tt
shallberented,l'tshallbere4tedonlytoter'.antswhoarefull-tl.ne
enployees of the upper Eagle valley' The Upper Eagle valley shall be
deerned to include the core valLey, Minturn, Rec cliff,, Gilman, Eagle-
lJ)rt\oo
Rfll'D i:[ir 1 3i991
VTbTo: Vail Building Departnent
rROU: Warner Developments, Inc.
DATE: February 5, L991
RE: ARTHT'R I. I{EARS
ANALYSIS OF AVAI,ANCHE, DEBRIS-FI'I{ & ROCKFALL
Lots 3, 4 & 5, Vail Va11ey 3rd Filing
The undersigned have read the Analysis of Avalanche, Debris-Flow,
and Rockfall Design conditions and Mitigation Design Criteria for
Lots 3, 4 and 5, Vail Valley 3rd Filing, prepared by Arthur I.
Mears, P.E., Inc.
We understand the report and have built on Lot 3 according to the
recomnendations contained in the report, and understand that there
may be danage from avalanche, debris-flow, and rockfall. We are
prepared to accept those facts and request the building departmentgrant us a permit.
WARNER DEVEI,OPMENTS, INC.
STATE OF COI.oRADO )) ss.
couNTY oF EAGLE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ne this Sth
day of February, 1991, by Robert warner, Jr., as President of
warner Developments, Inc., known to ne to be the person whose narneis subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to rnethat he executed the same for the purposes and considerationtherein expressed.
My commission e:ryires:
Q^'et --? 7t, 78( /
President
l
ZONE CHECK
FOR
sFR, R, R P/s zollE DISTRIcTS
at lL1nATF .ii6.iiryrro.r . rr .' r[ '-.&-ritinstis-JIUJ\ / -
AOORESS:
O',,tNER
ARCH I TECT
ZONE DIS
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Hei 9ht
Total GRFA
PrimarY GRFA
SecondarY GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course
Site Coverage
Lands capi ng
Fence/Retaining'dal1
Parki ng
Credi ts: Garage
Prooosed
--x]2_* f3* 1'?rfr-n6 3frl-4 1'o-) o'< t-. | ,/'
iLL-tc'uk '2'*o
gj strce
Al I ot'ted
(30)(33)
20'
1qt
15'
(30)(50)
)otz
5'o
NA
Z7 zr.e
2g'
-t.-r: {\t
Hei ghts
Pl>,
C-'z'> I -
Mechani cal
Ai rl ock
S torage
Solar Heat
Drive: SloPe Permi tted
Envi ronmental /Hazards :
Corrnents:
(3oo)(6oo)
(eoo)(lzoo)
(s0)(100)
(2s)(so)
(2oo)(4oo)
lope Actual
Avalanche
Flood Plain
lrletl ands
_s
al
64P'*2
;
I
, tf .S I 'i^^ -V: -1
Geologic Hazards
)r 2. 4 ,^a.,^
Zoning: Approved/DisapProved
Oate:
)Eatt 5lgnaEure
o. .i
'lr
APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DRB MEETI;1G ' YWA 1, MA
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION I'IILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application meeting with-a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
determjne ir any"ajiiiionui inforination is needed. No application will. be.accepted
untess it is compiii.-tnrrt incluae all items requ'ired uy'ttre zon'ing administrator).
It is the appticlni;i itiponsiuitity to make an dppointment with the staff to find
out iUout uibiti6nif-submittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE applica-
tion wilt streamiiil ihe approval process for,your proiect by decreasing the number
of conditions of ipirJuir ihat the'ona may st'ilulatb. -ALL c6nditions of approval must
be resolved before'a building permit is issued.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
t^Jrrtl n 7*a *nfe 4%et4
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address
rlllatle,;trler W+tt*L uNttr.
Lega'l Descri Pti on Lot ilork_Lr/^lbY Fi'linsr
D.
Zonins "/uc. NAr,rE 0F AppLrcANT: *^^n W*rqzFtf+ f*:-
Add res s
NAME OF APPLICANT.S REPRESENTATIVE: J uiJe lzetal t4'aerg klA
Address 4l4l I.WN+aA ?zuVoV+.. dz UUttelephone Aql'n
LlrglNez tbreln?,<a*re, tt t..
Address Ze Eb'slp?o>o ?ee,o,c aOO XvotJrcelb' . telephone ffifuo
be paid at the time a build'ing permit is requested'
FEE
E. NAME OF O!,INERS:
S'i gnature
F.DRB FEE: The fee wi]'l
VALUATION
$ o-$ 1o,ooo
$10,001 -$ 50,ooo
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ .500,000
$5oo,oo1 - $l,ooo,ooo$ Over $1,000,000
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
3. Peopl e who fai 'l
meet'ing and who
republ i shed.
1. In addjt'ion to meeting submittal requirements, the-applicant must stake the site
io indicate property iinei ana building corners. I"9"t- that wjll be-removed
inoria also be inirrla. itrii worf must-be completed before the DRB visits the
si te.
Z. The review process for NEl,l BUILDINGS will normally'invo'lve two separate meetings
ii-tn. Oeiibn neview-eoarl,-so ptan on at least tilo meetings for thejr approval'
to appear before the Des'ign Review Board at their scheduled
have'not asked for a postFonement wil'l be required to be
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300 .00
I
,.-
I
4.The following items no longer have to be. presented-to.the.Oesign_Revlan BoaF.
Tniy, howevei, have to be presented to the Zoning Administrator for approval:
a. Windows, skylights and similar exterlor changes that do not alter the
existing plane of the building; and
b. Buildinq additions that are not viewed from any other lot or public space'
which hive had letters submitted from adjoining property o{ners approving
the addition; and/or approva'l from the agent for, or manager of a condominium
association.
You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You should
check with a Town Planner before proceeding.
5.
i
,LIST OF MATERIALS
NAiIE OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF PR
The fol I orvi ng
Board before
A. BUILDING
Roof
Si di n9
0ther
information is required for submittal by the applicant to
a final approval can be fiven:
I4ATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL
the Oesign Review
COLOR
1a\c\e(e1ivez, ' 4W-4-
l*4Tqe\hfr ?wbo 4re7 He*lnbefx;'
waill Materiars b.fttllenc ztttsae ftrye cWY/il,rtu{rre
.ffAxtcJD t^bo , &?e1Fasci a
Soffi ts
l,|i ndows
|l|indow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ash'ings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0the r
N*o
?xntrt*>
?nil{e> HgnA-
Af.taa vJ/eat
ilar*Ja
xla.SZ
B. LANDSCAPiNG: Narne of Designer:
Dnone:
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REI'IOVED
Eotanical Name Common Name Quani ty Si ze*
for conifers.
(over)
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height
I. PLANT I'IATERIALS:
(con't)
SHRUBS
EXISTiNG SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
Botanical Name Corrnon Name
Tvpe Souare Footaqe
s0D
qFen
TYPE OF
I RRi GATI ON
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. 0THER'LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wal'ls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) P'lease specify.
o
Vail Valley
o
LOT 3
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVISION
JOB NAME
LOT 3 BLOCK FILING
A-DDRESS 1815 Sunburst Drive
The location of utilici.es, whether they be main trunk lines
uust be approved and verified by the following utilities for
site plan.
or proposed lines,
the acconpanylng
Authorized Slenature Date
Mountai-n Bell
468-6500
Western Slope Cas Co.
I 800 922-1987
Harry Moyes
Publlc Service Conrpany
949-s781
Gary HalI
Holy Cross Electirc Assoc.
949-5892
Ted Husky/Michael Lavert.y
HeriEage Cablevislon T. V.
94 9-5 5 30
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Valley Water &
Sanicaclon DisErict
47 6-7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE: These verifications do no! relteve lhe contractor of his responsibility
to obtain a slreet cu! pernlt fro& Ehe Town of Vail, Departnen! of Public
Works and !o obtain utility locations before digging in any public riShc-
of-way or easement in the Town of Va1l. A building permit is noE a sEreec
cut permit, A s!reec cut pelnit must be obEained separately.
This form Ls Eo verify service avaiLability and location.
This should be used in conjunction wich preparing your
utiliEy plan and scheduli.ng lnscallacions.
rt(Please bring a site plan when obEaining Upper Eagle Va11ey Wacer
& Sanicacion s ignature s )
tj
DNtz F1r&1.l4na -LEGAL DESCRIPTIoN: Lot -c
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
Fi1in9
one
Phone
ADDRESS:
Ol^lNER
ARCHI TECT
ZOiIE DIST
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Hei ght
TOIA] GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks: Front
S ides
Rear
l,later Course
Site Coverage
Landscapi ng
Fence/ Reta i ni ng 'rla1 I Hei ghts
Parki ng
Credi ts: Garage
Mechani ca I
Ai rl ock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: Slope Permitted
Envj ronmental /Hazards :
I
Al I orved
(30)@
+1un*
lr=l+4
20'
1ql
15'
(30)(so)
Prooosed
"o4l
AclaF@
E7b+
4c2
v.d/r,.a
n%
A',
P/x
?,Attt,/
--7-
filffi
(25)@
(2oo)@)
j/
-
1Wt
--f.(D-a--- ^+2s*r'/z-a
il
Slope Actual 1'/a
Avalanche aWJ- t'laWeffe Pze*t'c' XlorJa
Fl ood Pl a'i n
Slope
,l t
tletl ands
Geol og'ic Hazards
Nh..
Comments:
Zoni ng: ApProved/Di saPProved
Date:
Staff Signature
o
UJF
z
oz
J
€
z
tuJIF
lo
I
I
I
I
I
l-
IE
tot(5tzro
I
@
I
2z
E
FJ
lctlor('t
U)
uJ
IJJlr.
E
=E
LrJ
. t'
il I
:t l
Hl{
Elst
3lj'"
n?li,{orRt
o
()
q)
e
CL
CL(!
;ot-
o
o
v,(L
(6'
.E
o
q)E
o
(!
o1too
g)
;
=
E
o
=cl
d(D
o
o-(tt
3't
o
6*;q
;Egs9Uk;
:.s s?€'Hr e a
e.l (Il a
E 8::Ec-o>
cSsE
=EFIE >=:c96E
35;:
EEARE!Eo*.€8:
€qeP
E!secL (u o--
SE; e
oi-ool:fi:€
E6:F
:E€ H
E6 FS
(ll 0'-.=cxo(/)
E€EfggtE
9,!AEi F 5s
iE!e9E-or -eEg:
N
u)
UJ
uJu-
E
=E
UJc
J
FoF
o
c)
3q.rt
uJ
z
6
u.to
z6
=Jo-
z
o!
d)
=
E
UJ
.J
z
Eoo
z
F
Jlaz
Fz
Azz-
do3EOI
JIutl
=|l9lJIql
EIHI14 lql
'l il< r'll3Cl'l <l
Q e,liq (,l
| tsl|14 pt
H'l
qe|
xE
BZu-
6z;o
tr
c)
uJ
J
E
UJz
TIJ
>t
3tn.{
=(DGl
zz
io- 4Y-r!A=FEaOz>-OOo2
l,! <
o-Yi5
rN
I
E
(,
t\
lr]
I
I
I
el
dl
Llll
1l
al>l
rLlol
3l g
ol qlFIF
Olt-
Io\
e.l
tltl|trlIJt+| -,iqlzlHI
5glr+ .lFt olp.l uJll.clFq JIq
'-l1ela3{EolGI FI
dl
uJlnl
JI
<l>l
t!lol
zl
3tolFI
|.\
I\oc{
Ical.llO\l
ol
IJJIql
<l>l
r|-iol
zl
3lotFI
ts
n
F-l
B
EHH
=tr
rl
t.l
Fl
zl
dl
il
u-lol
zl
3lolFI
f-l
F
FfF]
z
tll
ts | c.)
< | ,-rt4tlE l'.o
I
c4 l\Tl
-l lrrIrnlet6
IEi
HAq>
gl><=EO
Fll
cril
(/ll
F1l
HI<lNlzi
'l14l(Jl
9l
;l
=l<l4
F
H
H
E
Eo
E
Fl
Nz
uJ
=z
.Do_-1
I
Il.
l.
I
IU'Itllclcll
CIniAo
Eir
=o2
2?;C)
=<>(r)Fd6o
z
r
ul
E
-.r O<FG()r!<ztrUJF(rzo
J
9EF
uJ
t-
r!h
'l
(l
t*
cr)
6z
h
Nq
,,.i
t{
s
z
,n9
=<coo
=z
O- tJ-
ifi
2?a
;H!
tr!tr
=
uJ(L
LL
E9E<cllo9)Ev!E9E;
cd
t!-
EJF
=4ti-E b=o i ;'iiE :1-E Ub
I \tuEXOt x>O i:i Fo. "ior-!=
u.lto
oF
---Enn
vts
rrr
=ruJ
1,71O-oo'a
zo
F
IJJv
uJ
dI
oF
t-:- co>olcqtUF
'r- ."iro-listO calogl
lc)l
HurbEzo
ts
=E
UJ
a-z9Fo
EFazo
C)
!
f
I!i.
TI].IBER T{OLF ENTERPRISES
P.O. BOX 3625
vArL, coLoRADO Bl6sB
303-926-2070
JOB SPECIFICATION SHEET
I{ECHANICAL ROOI.T I{ODIFICATION
rB15 SUNBURST LANE
SEPTEI.IBER 10, 1993
PERI'IITS AND FEES: OBTAIN RE0UIRED TOIJN OF VAIL PERIIITS'
FEES AND INSPECTIONS.
DEI,TOLITION AND trONSTRUCTION:
l. TEAR OUT DBOR AND JAIIB Ttl t'tOVE EXISTING HOT IIATER HEATER
TO STORAGE AREA UNDER STAIRS ADJACENT TO f'IECHANICAL ROOFI.
2. BREAKTHRT]UGH CLOSET }JALL ADJACENT TO STAIRWELL STORAGE CLOSET
FOR ACCESS TO EXISTING HOT TdATER HEATER ANO INSTALL AN ACCESS
DOOR. TNOTE:CONTRACTOR ASSUIIES THERE ARE NO UTILITIES OR
STRUCTURAL COI.IPONENTS TB INTERFERE b'ITH BREAKTHROUGH.
3. CONSTRUCT FRAf'IED tdALL trITH 2-B X 6-8 S-C I'IASONITE POCKET DOOR
TO PARTITION OFF THE I'TECHANICAL ROOf'l AND CREATE A HALL ttlAY.
4. INSTALL CEILING Tt] I.IATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS.
5. FIR OUT TJALL TO CONCEAL WIRING AND PIPES AND PROVIDE ACCESS
DOOR TO ]'IECHANICAL COMPONENTS.
6. TRII.I _BASEBOARD I,IOLDINGS TO f.IATCH EXISTING
I*NOTE: DOOR TRIM IN HALL l.lAY TJILL BE 2-L/4 " ANDERSON
CASING DUE TO THE TRII.I DETAIL REOUIRED FOR THE TI6HT SPACE.
THIS WILL DIFFER FROI,I THE EXISTING CASING BUT SHOULD CONFOR}1
TO THE OVERALL LOOK.
MECHANICAL:
1. !1OvE EXISTING HOT I^IATER HEATER TO STAIRTdELL STORAEE CLOSET
ADJACENT TO MECHANICAL ROOf.1.
2. VENT HOT WATER HEATER TO EXISTING STACK
3. REROUTE GAS LINE TO TJATER HEATER.
ELECTRICAL:
1. HOVE l-J BOX, l-SbJrT&lCH, I-DUPLEX OUTLET, AND CEILING LrBHT
FOR I.IECHANICAL ROOII.
2- ADD CEILING DRUFT AND 2 -SNAY SIIITCHES IN HALL WAY-
DRYIdALL:
1. HAN6 5./4" FIRERBCK
2- TAPE AND TEXTURE TO I.IATCH EXISTING.
PAINTIT{G: PAINT DRYIIALL, D(IORS, AND tIOODtfORK TO I'IATCH EXISTING.
CARPET: INSTALL CARPET IN HALLUIAY USING CARPET RUIIINANTS IN
STORAGE AREA.
CLEANUP: RET.IOVE l- CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROIaOB SrTE.
T*TNOTE-INAL CLEANUP TO BE DONE FTOTHERS.
T I I-4BER NOLF IN'TERPR I SES
P.O. BOX 3625
vAIL, CDI_ORADO 81658
30s-9?6-2070
JOB SF'ECIFICA-TION SHEE-T_
I.,IECHANICAI- RI]OM NODIFICATION
1815 SLINRURST LANE
UP
tcoP.
ll'J ?
'r\ n+f'
MqrLE 9 xp 9,
WarAvw<K ff.lP u^J4lL
ct
=E
=EIto-
(fl
&
c.{
\tN rnN 0\
c')
+
tnul
UJlr
E
=e.
IIJo
s\\\R$$I
I
I
o{ oc\ crtoN "-!c.J' (f) c--{uJ Fr F.{.lE-.*l^-tr
I
I
I
lr.l
I
l=J| .5Jtr:,2< F.l
siEli
HI=gHFrl=H (4
urF
9
BF
=-o
o
=z
oulFoz
oz
6:fo
.5
(t
=z
E
HL4<
at
ts
z
E
F]
14H
z
Ff
P.{
F]
a
FlA
zH
ts(n
E
z
Hts
ts
E
&H
4
Fl..l
z
Fl
H(.)
HF
(9zt-l
FlH
FC
zB
>r
&A
ed
uJIFoz
ttJul
att
=I
G
l!
Ito
uJGlF
zo
th
..+l
O+lH+l+lA+lP+l+lZ+l<+lrd+l|l+lc)+l
CJ
o
oE
gtt
G
.9
CL
CL6
F
oE
o
atooc6C
Eo
oE
otc6
otoo
CDc
!t
=5
@
E
o
=cl
Eo
eo.o,6
3
.g
E
t74)
ffiE;:
flEgE:
?€ EE.9
ii€iE?.r o€ o33 t't.:
"BEAFXFtEo
isE gF
iElge
cL 6 0,-$E; e
sEig
P666
EEEE
- cL.ll o
-vc,)6 0'-.-<; o o
sEi;
FEE;
Esae
,l'
@
a
)
C.l
@
r(
sl
lYtn
3G
)t
o\\o
tl
Fqv)
rn
F-
\o
\:r
&
E-EIuA0z
d
5
.o
I
C)u,toz
o-
J
o
E,FIuJJut
(,z
ao
=f
o.
J
Iz
()
It-
cfl
.+X
llJ
lllltzoF
UJGouJe
og
o.ot
uJEzIan
UJo
F
al,IutoA
z
UJ
x
F
IIJol
tt
u.l
llJlr
E
=E
IIJc
J
FoF
(JzoJ
ao
J
odF(,
uJJ
uJ
(,
=ao-
o.
{I
1I()
gJt
H
H
NOTMlY
le
t8
lF-l;> G "\lC
= ; :ElF
= i *ElF
= @ .5lE
F.1. y
YFc-- -:EP - ?22
P E =E:A; n!b{ 12Eg gH
rNO
z
H
H
p&H(/)z
E
ft{
zo
F
{
ar
a
oEo
IttG
F
g
o-ulE
J
zIEoo
z9
E
uJFJ
X
'UJz
IItltltl
ar>Fz
19O
<oo<
=A
=Hxr!6o<z
lt,
ts3r2=
d6!tr
!J
=
G
<t)oIuzY9I
ulalt
2
tr
J
oz
;JJ
t
F
uJ
o
-
3l
=l
2l
.. >loulo
UJutzp
=ut
o-
J
2
9
troo
o
d
lf
=Fo
5o
til;
il;,;
(.
I
a{q
-(f
-*
CD-:fOO
n
rfiI'
)7
ti--'
,,^
H
%a
z
o9z4
roO
=z>fd8
;Ei
=HT
ltko
UJFo
@o
zo
Fo.lltY
uJo
oF
F
=tr
UJo.
|r.o
o-oo
I
luFoz
=IEt!o-lro
EHF;toIPa93EE ,3tsE FE! 6tE 90E :HT HTsi
"HoF
@
E
=E
lrJo-z9F()3E,,
zoo
EE!
,
o
q)
r.l
r-t(!
r-t
'Fi(d
cr)
oz
t!
I
JJlo
-l
FoJ
(n
Fl
ts
rJ)&
z
ui
=z
to
--)
I
zH
.A
Hz
=
rl
rd
&t:rz&
B
ult
z
@rn
X
F
u,al,
UJEoo
J
=
\o
cn\t
Io\-iro\
o-
(J
zo
-
H
r:l
E
c)
H
H
F](Jz
Ic
ltl
tc
14
PI
s
.v
tJl.4
u,lEoo
J
T
r\
@o\
c.l
I.+.$.$
io,
H
F:
()
zH
&
ax
=
=E
II
I
oz
ct
UJ
G
Ji
ttoz3oF
\o(r)\'
I
o\
u
u
F
=r
II
oz
ci
IUtrI
lt
z3oF =e
l!
=E
tt
o2
CJ
uJE
J
t!oz3oF
EE
l!
oz
ouG
J
l!oz
=oF
ulJufF
e,
uJz3o
F()
UJE
ot
E
-rO<Fco
tJJ <ze[!F<5t
C)
Je<oC)F
EE
iF
(,z
6
=Jc
x.
?)
1.
z
l.)
9z
-O
uJ
=
I
?)
=z
oGhg
Ft-o2 oo
-oftfrJO
I
trtrtr
Town of Vail
25 s. Frontage Road
Vail , Colorado 8L657
(303) 476-7OOO
PIan analysis based onthe 1.988 Uniforn Building Code
Project Nunber: 4344 Name: SUNBURST, I.,oT 3
Address: 1815 SUNBURST DRM Date: April 26, 1990
Occupancy: R3,MI-
Type of Const: V-N
Contractor: WARNER DEVEIOPITENT
Architect: ;rTJNGE REICH UAGEE
Engineer: NONE
P1ans Exarniner: NORRIS
NoTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a conpleteIisting of alL possible code requirements in the 1988 UBc. It is a g'uide to
selected sections of the code.
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 16.0 Feet L6.0 FeetEASr Public way 66.0 Feet 45.0 Feet
SOUTH Property line L5.5 Feet 15.5 Feet
YIEST Property line 50.0 Feet 50.0 Feet
Area increased 37.50* for open area on 2 sides.
FL NAI.IE OCC UAX FLR AREA ALL,,OWED RATIO STATUS
L Dwelling R3 ok 1960 Unliurited okL Parking carage M1 ok 793 Unlimited ok
TOTAL FOR FL,OOR 2753 Unliurited ok
B Dwelling R3 ok 1880 unlinited ok
TOTAL FOR FIOOR 1880 Unlinited ok
BUILDING TOTAL 2753 Unlinited ok
o
Page # 2
Code revietr for:Project Id.: SttNBuRsT, LoT 3
Address: 1815 SUNBURST DRIVE
The actual height of this building is 33.0 feet.
The maximum height of the building is 40.0 feet. -- Table 5-D
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
TabLe 17-A & Table 5-A
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON.BRG OPNG BRG NON.BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT V'ALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
M]- Ohr ohr None Obr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTfBLE material . Sec.22oL.
None -- No fire protection requirenents for openings.Prot -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assenblies.
508 of the area of the wall maxirnum. Sec.2203.(b) & Table 5-A
Maxirnum single window size is 84 sq. ft with no dirnensiongreater than L2 feet. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NoP -- openings are not permitted in this wa1l.* -- These walls may be required to have a parapet $tall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet wall is reguired to have the sarne
fire rating as the waII. See section 1-709. for details and exceptions.
OTHER BUILDTNG ELE}IENTS TAbIC 17-AELEI,TENT I'IATERIAL RATING NOTES
Interior Bearing wall Any 0 hrInterior nonbrg wall- Any 0 hrStructural Frame Any 0 hrExterior Struct Frame Any 0 hr See footnote #1Floor/Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr See Footnote #9Roof/Ceiling Assenbly Any 0 hr
Stairs Any None
FOOTNOTES:
J.) Mininun on exterior side also based on exterior brg. waIl requirements.
9) In areas with vehicles or airplanes, the floor surface shall be of
noncornbustible, nonabsorbent nateriaLs. -- Sec. 702. (b) & 902. (b)
OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONSR3-ML Lhr Materials approved for thr construction are required on the
garage side only and 1- 3rls inch sotid core, self-closing door. -- Sec.
s03. (d) ex #3
ADDITIONAL SEPARJATTONS
FOR R3 OCCUPANCY:
FOR M]- OCCUPANCY:
Code review for:Project Id.: SUNBURST, LOI 3
Address: 1815 SUNBIIRST DRM
EXIT FEQUIREI.TENTS:FL NAI-IE
o
Page # 3
OCCUPANT NI'MBER EXTT PANIC RATED DOOR NOTES
IOAD REQUIRED !{TDTH [ft. ] HDWR CORRIDOR SI{TNG
L Dwelling1 Parking carage
TOTALB Dwelling
TOTAL
7 L 0.1 No No N,/R
4 1 0.1 No No N/R
10 2( 2l o.2( 0.2) No No N/R
5 1 o.l- No No N/R
5 1( 1) 0.1( 0.2) No No N/R
Door swing is based on Sec. 3304.(b) except as noted.
Occupant load is based on Table 33-A.
Number of exits is based on Table 33-A except as noted.Exit rridth is based on Sec. 3303.(b).
FOOTNOTES:
STAIR NOTES:
A stairway in a dwelling rnust be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 3306. (b)
The maximum rise of a step is 8 inches and the mininum run is 9 inches.
-- Sec. 3306.(c) exc.f1
Provide a handrail on one side a stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if
there is nore than 4 risers. -- Sec. 3305.(j)
Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. llinimun height
= 36 inches, maximum opening size = 5 inches. -- sec. L7LL. exc 2
The minimun headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. -- sec. 3306. (p)
EncLosed usable space under the stairs is reguired to be protected as required
for l-hr fire-resistive construction. -- sec. 3306. (n)
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS:L) The roofing on this building is not required to be fire retardant.
-- Table 32-A
AUTOMATIC SPRINKI.,,ER SYSTEMS :
STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS:
There is no requirernent for a standpipe. -- Table 38-A
A hose is not required. -- Table 38-A
FOOTNOTES !
1) The location is to be per Sec. 3805. (c), (d),and/or(e)
WALL AND CEILING FINISH:1) walI and ceiling finish materials are required to cornply with
Sec. 4204. (a) and Table 42-8.2) Carpeting on wal1s and ceiling are required to have a Class I
flane spread rating. -- Sec. 4204. (b)
o
Page # 4
Code review for:Project Id.: SIINBURST, LoT 3
Address: 1815 SUNBURST DRM
INSUI.ATION NOTES:
1) AIl insulation material including facings are required to have a flame-
spread rating of 25 or less and a maxinrum smoke density of 45o unless
it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with a wall or
ceiling. -- Sec. 1713.(c) exc.{22) Foan plastic insulations are required to be protected. -- sec. L7L2.
GI,AZING REQUIREMENTS!L) A11 glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safetyglazing material. -- Sec. 5406. (d)
ADDITTONAL REQUIREIiIENTS 3
For R3 occupancy
Provide a window or door to the exterior from every roorn used for
sleeping. -- Sec. L2o4.
A window must provide a clear open area of 5.7 sq.ft., a clear height
of 24 inches, and a clear width of 20 inches(nininun). -- Sec. L2o4.
All habitable rooms require exterior glazed openings equal to l-o* or
more of the floor area. (nin 1-0 sg.ft.) -- Sec. L205.(a)
All habitable rooms require an operable exterior openings equal to 5t
or more of the floor area. (nin 5 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1205.(a)
The rnininum ceiling in a habitable space is 7 feet 6 inches exceptkitchens, tralls, and baths may have a ceiling height of 7 feet. --sec. -- 1207. (a)
Provide a smoke detector in all areas having access to sleeping
rooms. -- Sec. L210.(a)4.
Provide a snoke detector in basement that is connected to an alarm
audible in all sleeping areas. -- Sec. 1210.(a)4.
For l[L occupancy
r\REC'! JUL 0 91990
\TARNER
DE V ELOPM ENTS. INC.\N
2O EACLE ROAD P. O. BOX 958 AVON, COLORADO 81620 (lOl ) 949 -4 J6 0 DENVER(303) 534-46es
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL SUBCONTRACTORS AND THEIR EMPLOYEES
RE: SUNBURST HOMES/CONSTRUCTION PARKING
FROM: STEVE HOIdARD/SUPERINTENDENT
DATE: JULY 7, 1990
After several diecuseione with the Vail Police Department, the
following guidelines for parking have been set.
ALL VEHICLES MUST BE PARKED OFF OF PAVEMENT, FACING THE
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC.
Also, due to linited parking on site, please encourage employees tocar pool if possible.
No further warnings will be given. The Vail Police Department has
beeD instructed to ticket and/or tow any vehicles in violation.
If you have aDy questiona, p]-ease contact me. Your cooperation
would be appreciated.
(JONSTRUCTION . t)I'VEt-()IMENT . INVI:'STMENT
tillr, - -.
Nicol Hutchinson Hofland lnc.
CONSULTING STBUCTUBAL ENGINEERS
June 28, 1990
,lunge Reich Magee AIA
4141 Arapahoe
Boulder, Colorado 80303
Re: Lot 3 Vail VaLl-eyVai1, Colorado
Job No. 90030
This will confirn my conversation with you concerning wal1
reinforcing requirements for section 5/S1 .
Where the outside grade elevation exceeds 5 feet above the
basement fIoor, provide reinforcing as shown in section 6/51.
Where the outside grade is equal to or less than 5 feet abovethe basenent floor, provide two No. 5's, continuous, top and
bottom of basement wal1.
NICOL HUTCHINSON I1OFLAND, INC.Consulting Structural Engineers
(-_
Nico1,
.,.r i990-
z\<
..'..,$tu:,jl:[r;r,3"-\\'^\-'-.-- o A ^'.-U XZ
<\- '\r ^! -\, .ar.-.g -?-. ^. ' -o-.-di,'::
"*tt***t"
dk 3lt r
f1900 308
1539 Pead Street, Suite 400
Boulde( Colo.ado 80302
1303) 443-t677
FAX {303) 449-2422
ri{-i r,
\Y/A D NItrDw^l\r \ t-t \
DEVELOPMENTS, INC,\N
20 EAGLE ROAD P.O. BOX 958 AVON, COLORADO 81620 (.tC1) 949,416A DENVER(3OJl534-4695
iilt .-,J - IU9U
June 28, 1990
Dan Staaek
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
VaiI, Colorado 8L557
SUNBURST DRIVE - ASPIIALT PAVING
You have brought to our attention that the aephalt paving on the
North side of Sunburet Drive, in front of Lot 3, hae gustained
geveral grouser cleat narks fron loading and unloading of the heavy
equipment for the excavation of Ehe Sunburst golf course homes.
qtDI will insure that when the asphalt paving is done for the
drivewayg to the houses, we will make proper repairs to remove the
grouaer cleat marks in the asphalt shoulder on the north side of
Sunburet Drive.
If you have any further gueations regarding ttrj-s matter, please
coBtact me.
hIARNER DEVELOPMENTS, INC.
nntr
By
Coriet ruc tion
CONSTRUCTION ' DEVELOPMENT ' INVESTMENT
zs Nicol Hutchinson Hof land Inc.
CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
May 10, 1990
Junge Reich Magee AIA
4141 Arapahoe
Boulder, Colorado 80303
Re: Lot 3, Vail Va11ey
Vai l- , Colorado
Job No. 90030
Attention: Mr Glenn Magee
This will confirm that we have reviewed the revised
Architectural and Structural drawings dated May 9, 1990, for
the above referenced project.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, the drawings are in
conformance with the requirenents of the design criteria set
forth in the report titled nAvalanche, Debris-F1ow, and
Rockfall Design Conditions and Mitigation Design Criteria,Lots 3, 4, and 5, vail Val1ey 3rd Filingn, dated May' 1990 and
prepared by Arthur I. Mears, P.E., 1nc.
NICOL HUTCHINSON HOFLAND, INC.
C-onsulLing Structural Engineersnl\ ti nt\ | o,t I n" Ia-.-.-+/t- t--.- V \*-f4-rl
Joseph C. Nicol, P.E.
."$)u-tf,%,
%#'::N
dk 3It r
f190030A
1539 Pearl Slreet, Suile 400
Boulder Colorado 80302
(303) 443,1677
FAX: (3O3) 4a9-2422
s 2
%A*46,oto
#*re
Nicol Hutchinson Hofland Inc.
CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
May 8, 1990
Junge Reich Magee ATA
4141 Arapahoe AvenueBoulder, Colorado 80303
Re: Lot 3, Vail ValleyVai1, Colorado
Job No. 90030
Attent ion:Mr. Glenn Magee
We have revj-ewed the Analysis of Avalanche, Debris-F1ow, andRockfall Design Conditions and Mitigation Design Criteria,Lots 3, 4, and 5, Vail Valley 3rd Filing, dated May, 1990 andprepared by erthur I. Mears, p.E., fnc.
To the best our knowledge and belief the design criterj.a has
been incorporated into t.he structural design and details ofthe above referenced building.
N]COL HUTCHINSON HOFLAND, INC.Consulting SCructural Engineers
(303) 443-1677
FAX: (303) 449-2422
Joseph C.N j.col, P. E.
dk 3lt r
f190030
1539 Pearl Street, Suite 400
Boulder, Colorado 80302
' JUNG€ R€rcH MRG€€ nrfi+lr€crun€ 6 eLRNNTNo e]essroNnL coRpoRRTroN
May 8,1990
Shel ly Mel I o
Town of Vai'l
Pl anni ng Department
75 South Frontage RoadVaiI, C0 8'l657
RE: I.IARNER DEVELOPMENTS, INC.. RESIDENCE/LOT 3 - vAIL vALLEY
As J9u are aware, construction plans for the proposedresi dence on Lot #3 have been sdbmi tted to the ' Bui I di ngDepartnent and have been routed for permi t rel ease. Tharelease of the building permit has been contingent upon finalreview and design/certification that the struCture Lonformsto rockfal I debri s and snow aval anche l oadi ng cri teri a asestabl i shed by Arthur l'lears, p . E .
l,
, itti on
i sed
gh
I
e
Otrr.
ely
The . encl osed . package i ncl udes two sets of compl eteconstruction documents indicating revisions made to complywith the loading established by the Mears report, one coiy-ofthe Mears report and analysis of the potential loading uponthe structure, and certified letter'from the structuraiengineer indicating that the design loads have been satisfied.
At the end of 'last week wehave made modifications toconditions that the analysis
received the Mears analysis andthe documents to sati sfy thebrought to light.
As you are av{are, the Lot #3 site is subject to rockfaldebri s fl ow and snow aval anche impact. In order toadequately protect the structure frori rockfal'l and debrisis in general required to provide solid walls to an elevaof 5'- 0u above adjacent grade on the flow side. The revdocuments now indicate prbtection of the structure throuthe use of raised foundation walls at the structure wal
I i nes where affected, and through the i ncorporati on ofdetached court wal I s and retai ni ng wal I s surroundi ng thdri ve/parki ng area and I ower bedioom wi ng whi ch rii'l Iessential ly provide a barrier for rockfall and debris flPer the Mears report, this concept of protection adequat
mi ti gates potenti a1 damage al ong the - south and east
el evati ons of the structure. The- retai ni ng wa1 1 conceptprovides additiona'l interest to the site and aestheti-calwill impove thtj overall product.
al so
1y
To satisfy the loading criteria required to withstand snol{avalanche loads as determined in the Mears report, v{e havefurther analyzed the wall surfaces subject to joadi and have
made modications to framing by adjusting wood stud spacingand size and by adjusting shear wall capacities.
303 444-2987coLoRRDO 80303RRRPRHO€ RV€NU€ BOULD€R4141
'' JUNG€ R€rcH MRG€€ nrficrrr€crun€ 6r eLRNNTNo fessroNnL conponanoN
Developments, Inc. - Resldence/Lot 3 - Vall Valley
Please let me know of any questions you nay have or lfbe of further assistanCe-ln thls mattei. It is nyunderstandl ng - _that plovi di ng you wl th thl s package -
lnf0rmatlon wlll resu'lt ln the release of the liulldlngfor this proJect.
Sln rely,
llagee,
GGM/el a
Encl osure
cc: Bob l{arner
Gary Marner
Joe l'llcol
4141 RRRPRHO€ RV€NU€ BOUTD€R, COLORRDO 80303 3O3 444.2987
Shel ly llel I oRE: [arner
May 8, 1990
Page Two
I can
of
perml t
rN
WARNER
DEVELOPMENTS. INC.
\N
20 EAGLE ROAD P.O. BOX 958 AVON, COLORADO 81620 (3O3) 9+9.+360 DENVER(303) 534-4695
May l-, 1991-
She11y Mello
Town Planner
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail , Colorado 8L657
Dear Shelly:
Thank you for your letter of April 25th concerning the TCo for Lot 4.
As I stated in ny letter to Abe Shapiro, we hope to have the landscaping
done by June l-st. However, as wet as things have been for the last
month, we are behind schedule. We will keep you posted if we do not
neet the original date of June l-.
In your letter you also stated that the construction access road which
crosses Lot 3 should also be revegetated at this tine. ft is our
understanding that the golf course wishes to keep this road open, andtherefore the road would not be revegetated. I believe all the
neighbors would prefer to elininate the road. If possible, we would be
happy to revegetate it if the golf course concurred.
Sincerely,
Warner, Jr.
Cc: Ron Phillips
Ken Wilson
CONSTRUCTION ' DEVELOPMENT . INVESTMENT
iN
TTARNER
I) E V E L L) PItI E NTS. I N(:,\s
20 EAGLE Rc)AD P.O. ROX 958 AVON, COLORADO 8r620 (103t 919-4360 DENVER(303) 53{-469t
May L, L99L
Abe Shapiro
2L795 Toun Place Drive
Boca Raton, Florida 33433
Dear Abe:
A copy of your letter to Ron Phillips was forwarded to me on the
29th of April.
As busy as people are at the Town of Vail, I regret that you did
not contact us first concerning any questions that you may have had
relating to the three homes that we are developinq on sunburst
Drive.
Regarding the rrwork roadr, it is the GoIf Coursers desire to keep
that road open as a work road for the golf course. We used an
existing road and that road will renain after our construction and
landscapingi are complete. we would prefer to landscape directly to
the golf course. However, as of last year, the golf course found
it necessary to maintain the rrwork roadrr.
As you are aware, for the last two weeks it has snowed consistently
leaving the ground snor,r covered, frozen and saturated. Because of
this, ie nav6 not been able to begin our landscaping. As soon as
the weather improves and the sun comes out and dries the land, we
will irnrnediately begin removing any construction debris and start
final grading for landscaping. Because of the wet spring, I will
be somewhat at the nercy of landscapers htho have been on a late
start throughout the valley because of the arnount of precipitation
during April .
ff you have any questions concerning the landscaping or our houses,
please do not hesitate to contact ne.
Sincerely,
/z-Robert Warner, Jr.
CC: Shelly Mello
Ron Phillips
(:ONSTRUCTION ' DEVELOPMENT ' INVESTMENT
75 3outh lrontage road
vall. colorado 81657
(303) 47$.438
(3ql) 47$?139
April 23, l-99o
Sunburst, lot 3
L815 Sunburst Drive
Contractor: Warner development
Permit # 4344
ollice ol communlty developmenl
Plan review based on the 1985 edition of U.B.C., U.M.C., U.P.C. and
1987 edition of N.E.C..
The following list of iterns ore deficient in rneeting the minirnum
code requirements adopted by the Town of vail . Subnitted plan
are anended as follows to meet code requirements.
l-. ) Garage door # L5 is required to be I-3/8x solid core
rninimum, not the 2o minute rating as indicated on
schedule. U.B.C. sec. 503 c & d.
2.) Wood burning fireplace chase is reguired to have
fire rating on inside of chase.
3.) cas fireplaces noted on plans in activity room,
room and master bedroom are required to be a gas
vent appliance. Town of vail ord. # ze.
1--hr
dining||b!r
4., Provide combustion air for gas fired equipurent in
mechanical rooru as required. U.M.C. ch. 6.
If there are any questions concerning these issues or any other
items please feel free to call.
Joe Norris
Plans Examiner
Town of Vail
AL IRSPECTION'S COUPLETEI}
The lteoe below ueed to be eouplete before
glvlng a pernl.t a flnal C of 0.
Pleaee check off ln the box provlded.
FINAL PLI'MBING
DATE:
FINAI UECEANICAL
DATE:
\'-X'
BUILDING
)i\\\
EAST SIDE:WEST SIDE:
DATE:
TEMPORARY C OF O
DATE:
CERTIFICATE OF OCCIIPAIICY
DATE:
LANDSCA?INC DI'E
DATE:
FII.E NAUE:
Xwi.hqddry^^ ryK w TT""e\,il'k ++"!A w@-* -TrP
U
l)r4 fuz^t,
utAell4-bua
bP*,e,[-Pu+or
2
> -l l"o
'14
N1EO fr )ttuh( tcE
&eu l
AilALYSTS 0F AVALAilCHE, DEFRTS-FL0}|, AtlD RoCKFAII
DESI GI{ COI{DITI O1{S AIID I,IITI GATI 01{ DES IGII CRIIERIA
LOTS 3, 4, AI{D 5, YAIL VALLEY 3RD FILIIIG
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ANALYSIS OF AVALANCHE, DEBRIS-FLOW, AND ROCKFALL
DESIGN CONDITIONS AND ITITIGATION DESIGN CRITERIA
LOTS 3, 4, AND 5, VAIL VALLEY 3RD FILING
Prepared For
Junge Reich Magee Architecture
Prepared By
Arthur I. Mears, p.8., Inc.
' Gunnison, Colorado
May, 1990
T
I
I
o
STUDY OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS
This analysis of geologlc hazards (snow avalanche, debris flows,
and rockfall) and specification of design criteria for structural
protection was requested by Mr. Glenn Magee and has the following
specific objectives:
a. Determination of design velocities and energies of
the geologic processes at the building sites;
b. Calculation of design loads on exposed building
surfaces at Lots 3, 4, and 5; and
c. Discussion of the overall hazard increase resulting
from the proposed construction.
The study is site specific, therefore the analysis and desi-gn
criteria presented here should not be applied to other locations.
Furthermore, the loading criteria specified in this report
depends on building locations, orientations, and shapes as given
in the Junge Reich lvlagee plans dated March and Apri1, I990.
Changes to these plans may invalidate the design criteria.
2 DESCRIPTION OF THE HAZARD
Description of the type and severity of the avalanche' debris-
flow and rockfall hazard is summarized in the following "hazardmatrix" which was extracted from a February 7, 1988 letter report
to Mr. Mark Cadmus. This 1988 report is attached as an appendix-
HAZARD MATRIX
Lot *Snow Aval Debris Flow Rockfal l
o
I
( 4Imph )
J
3.3ft)
( l0mph )
g/m'
5fr)
( IOmph )
I , 300k9 )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
l
I
t
I
I
#3, 3rd Filing
#4t It
{+< tl
Moderate
Moderate
No Hazard
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
lloderate
Moderate
Moderate
Specific design criteria for each buildingr location were derived
through observations and measurements of terrain, analysis of the
results of previous events, and application of statlstical and
physical model s of avalanche motion . The physica I
characteristics of the "design-magnitude" events at each building
site are summarized below.
Lot 3 Snow-avalanche velocity - 18m,/srr rr densitY = 50k9,/mrr rr dePth = 1.0m (
Debris-f 1ow velocity = 4.5m,/s
'' rr density = 2'000krr rr depth = l.5m (
Rockfall velocity = 4.5m/s
" diameter = 1.0m (
o
Snow-avalanche velocity = I4m/s (32mpn)
rf rr Aanc i +" : c,A]-- /r Jdensity= 50k9,/m
As the above listing of design conditlons indicates, rockfall
design velocity is assumed to be the same as or less than debris-flow velocity. Since debris flows may contain rocks as large asthose produced by rockfall at this Iocation, acconmodation ofrock irnpact within the debris flow (discussed in Section 3d),wiII also provide protection from rockfall. Rockfall protection,therefore, need not be designed separately if debris-f lowprotection is designed. Debris flows will produce loads equal tothe flow heights. (assumed to be 1.5m; 5ft). Rockfall is assumedto also occur wj-thin this height range at the building locations.
Snow avalanches affecting Lots 3 and 4 originate in a fairly
smaI l, but open and active avalanche path which beginsapproximately 600 feet above and south of the proposed buildinglocations. When this .avalanche releases to maximum extent, itwiIl cross Sunburst Drive as a low-density, mixed motion, dry-
flowingrzpo$/der avalanche approximately 50m (200ft) wide as itruns across Lots 3 and 4. The impact forces and impact heightsprovided in the design criteria assume vertical upward deflectionof the desj-gn snow avalanche as the flow is interrupted by thebuilding surfaces. Lot 5 is beyond the runout of the design
aval anche .
DESIGN-LOADING CONDITIONS AND DIAGRAIT{S
The design-loading conditions on the exposed building waIIs are
summarized in Figures t - 12. The following points should beconsidered when using the loading criteria.
a, Avalanche and debris-f1ow loads are not---------"'.=1._-simultanffimost likely during the
beiioa'November 15 - April 15; debris flows during theperiod May I - October 1.
Lot 5
||tl
Debri s-f I ow
||tl
|ltl
Rockfa 1 I
tl
_'IJEDTIS-I }OW
depth
ve I oci ty
density
depth
ve locity
diameter
velocityrr rr densityrr I' depth
Rockfall velocity
" diameter(Beyond runout of design
= I.0m (3.3ft)
= 4.5m,/s (lQmph)
= 2,000k9/mr
= 1.5m (5ft)
= 4.0m,/s (9mph)
= 1. 0m ( 1 ,300k9 )
= 4.5m/s (fQmph)
= 2,000k9,/mr
= 1.5n (5ft)
= 3.5m,/s (8mph)
= 1. 0m ( 1, 300k9 )
a va I anche )
b. Avalanche and debris-flow loads increase fromto the maximum specified in 0.1-to-0.3 seconds.
zeto
They-
I
I
glp-g t d --p-e--!.r,e-q! e I ee + rn p c9 !- I s qd I - r q- {e s rs!-.
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c. Avalanche loads are resolved into 3 mutually-
perpendicular directions on each wa11:
Pn -- Normal to wall;
Pv -- Vertical shear;
Ps -- Lateral shear.
The relati.ve load magnitudes are expressed
Pv = Ps = 0.5 Pn at all heights. (1)
d . .Qther _Ioads_ normall11 _conqideqed _in d99i9n gt this
locations (wind, snowr etc.), must be added to the
avalanche or debris-flow loads. Snow loads need not be
q6aea to debris-flow loads, hoyeve_r.
e. Debris-flow loads are represented as uniform loads
over a 5 ft height in the loading diagrams. Hoviever'
these flows wj-11 also contain rocks up to 3.3 feet in
diameter suspended in the movi-ng, muddy matrix. These
rocks can produce Iarge impact forces over small
surfaces. The largest rocks have gr mass, M, of 1f300
kg (2870lbs/32.2 = 89 lbs-ft/secz, or "slugs"), and
will impact the surface at a velocity, V, of 4.5m/s (15
ft/s). The irnpact force, P, of rock impact within a
debris flow can be expressed
p = (M y2 6y0.5,
where K is a stiffness factor.
(2)
For a simple beam,
K = 48 Er/L3, (3)
where EI is the bending stiffness and L is the beam
length. Equations (21 and (3) indicate that flexible
structural members are more efficient in resistingimpact than stiff ones. The actual expression for
stiffness, K, as represented in (3) must be replaced
with an appropriate expression for the particular
structural members being analyzed.
t. Debris-flow loads are the same regardless of wall
orientation, unli.ke snow-avalanche loads. The loads
are assumed constant on the various surfaces because
debris flows can turn in unpredi.ctable directions near
the buildings and can impact the walls at right angles.
AVALANCHE, DEBRIS-FLOW, AND ROCKPALL HAZARD
Any development within areas known to be reached by avalanches,debris flows, or rockfall will increase the overall- hazard. Thishazard increase is a natural consequence of the additional
exposure of persons who will be using the area. There exists
s9T9 small probability that the persons one wishes to protect\^/i11 not be inside the specially-designed building wh-en thegeologic process occu rs
Town of Vail ordinance on "geological ly-sensitive areas"recognizes this small residual hazard to those who may be outsideand accepts the risk because outside total exposure represents asmal1 percentage of the total time. This small hazaid can bereduced even further if residents become educated about thegeological processes (including snow avalanches), and heed aIIofficial warnings.
5 CITANGE IN HAZARD TO ADJACENT PROPERTY
The avalanche, debris-flow, and rockfall mitigation recommendedin this report will not increase the hazard to adjacent property.Specifically, in terms of Town of Vail requi_rements, the proposedmitigation (direct structural reinforcement), wiIl not increasethe hazard to other public or private property or structures. orto public buiJ.dings, rights-of-way, roads, streets, utilities,facilities, or other properties. It should be noted, however,that the above statement could not necessari-1y be made ifprotection separate and uphiIl of the proposed buildings were
bui 1t
Arthur I. Mears, P. E.
Aval anche -control engineerI
I
I
I
l
l
I
I
I
I -ffiili-'h'ff#'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
toT ,
South Elevation Load.s
Snow
Avalanche Debris
Flow
1l0psf
(P.,r=P"=.5Pn at arl . heighls)
T.NT ?":!:-:---2
East Elevation Loads
J0psf
(P.,r=Pr= .Jp' at aJ-1 heights)
FIGURE 1. Snow-avalanche and debris-flow 1oads on Lot
Avalanche and d.ebris-flow loads are not simultaneous.t^till be resisted in design for d.ebrls flow ( see text) .shear, P., is shown in Figure 2.
J building.
RockfalL load-s
Avalan che late
Debris
FIow
o tll
s,i:.-
'Cf_)
Ut
$3-
rl?ito
x9ddl\'
o
N/ss? 8_..-j-1").--
\,
\...-:\
t '. '<--
/:
-)
fu'l
dtl
Fl --e-'/,
l-@
IJn, rT-6
=l[ !$4ll {
rdll ii
I ull 1u
'l-ll ni'l
mll \,{
o.:Fcx("q
= 7*1Hqs '-E
-i |rl _ rn a!qrxtr;iiI o d5 Liul o..{'i=6s.8
#N o lro 3 0)u od4or
- tJ: .11o;gEf=--C O .-l r-\o .-r d i-q+ > '.cd o d c.'i -r{ O ltD
E HEEI€< .O (J F_] | Or{
N
.=
\l\,?6.
I'
I
\9
-_€r ,/;'B',/3 E".'\x\
\'/,"/>Ev*A-,4-. I F-{
{1
I
:I
iI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
!
I
I
II
I
I
I
II
l
I
It
Il
Il
l
I
-7
o
-
ul
_l
LIl
t-(.r
tr
i--rjj 1.. - l-l-- j--F r' 1
l--1J-1-l--l-lr--ll .
-l
11 rr I-r r*rrl-Ll- 1itll:
L]
Ii
ad(!
-I
TI
ll
lr-
ll
r-l
-rl
I
I
I
I
:
I
I
|l
I
l
i
I
i
I
i
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
ot-\
q
iq,9i
\i$
I
=lliOlll
3[j
ilil
r-lllil
oil
"11
1
I
L
.)
6
I L-rttttrtl
e
-i 'r<'
Yloz2 r<
f Yd-
P.r
'.f + ..
0)Y
i
"^'l..1flqlHl
oarrd
(ddo(l) ,-laoFgoXrloq{
Itna
O '.{o l.{tdFcH c)H.d
ad
F
rno
(o
trtd
f&o
(i
rl
i/tl\
liiil
f[ii
u
TnI
l_lt____Jnn
T
i:llun
nlnrl
nl
nl
ll,
t-ltl
'llItl
ll_l
ll_l
n
t]1
nlll
lrlln__..Jl!
t_il
LrlI
r-_l
t__l
r[-_l
Ir_l
u TI
TIn
l-_ll_l
[]
rn
lt I
In
I
?l<lot
o'
t:l
"ltr
:l
-2
1
;
s3
,l'
o
a/.
!
\
q.$
+i{
'l
i',P
irI'll$
N,'I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
1
$
:\
zrfllt\.ill
:lFilril-l
il
I Lg::-
.d) t-- - '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
ll
I
I
lr
I
I
I
I
lll
I
I
l
l
l
I
I
South El-evation Loads
Snow
Avalanche
(Pu=P"=o.JPn at all heights)
East Elevation Loads
(Avalanche loads do not
affect East elevation)
FIGURE 5. Snow-avalanche and d.ebris-flow loads on Lot
Avalanche and debris-flow load-s are not simultaneous.
will be resisted in design for d.ebris flow rock lnpact
Lateral avalanche shear, P^, is shown in Figure 6,
I
l
l
I I building.
Rockfall loads
(see text).I
l
l
Debris
FIow
oI
I
l
I
I
I
I
%-r.*,"rn=i
€S ,....'',.aES,s
I - ----/ /i'
/ lt./^[
ft';ft,t
;'.gt
,I1,
1
i *l
Itli,ltlI ctl-ltltllllo,
I
I
I
s// {-dl =+i- '
l ll- .-. fi Hi ,'HI E-Y: ,'l | 'r--"--_ J._ /1 ---/__#u
/ /-'-./ttt //E /'<) /-'/ 7r - l,/E
//= /"- - -/ --r'-.--r/o'
J ,/t-/''-< /o
/--/':')\ "/ _F/;r4e/ i -/:e Ff Po|o, f o g .-l -/ './ f o d .-{ o/ t' / AAdd' /,.t^r,. / '.{ d3 rd/!:,ixv/ ! i ui,j ,o.7+{/ €EtgJ__:"'Y cdoo/ - "'/'u" fi ;E !t > Q.A ^t/ oH= i;-', / ;H,rpfi/ '*d;.ist 5.-l d 0J l-l/ HrE36
/ tr 3 orrd
\,
I
I
l
I
r
W
,t .>
ta\--_
w"7
s$
..._,/ t',-F
.*.t-....-..
.' ...:\ '
/
/
!
tA.Li-\K.J8)
\J--l
.f'2
,r iQ
ll et
4llfu1ll I*dil et
-tx,lll g r
t-ll + dl
nll ril
j-=- =-:=*=-
I F-'!- --tJ -
l'- - r
i.ll-"-'-'-tilL .J
I
I
@
t
F
:1
t-a
bJ
(\
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
+)
oaog
x().
(/)3ooO.{dq{qrFr(,a '.'l(/)trp
i " -lla\ .r{ |di{rldqtr{l'q)
Er\
D-l(JdH>t{ d
I
1-l5t:
IE1?l9+I llllFlzQlF-lflo'tO
c
@
I
liilli
"-.ll
tl
il
tl
il
i\ r'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(Snow avalanches do not reach Lot J)
FIGIJRE 9. Debris-flow load.s are assuned uniform overlower J feet on south and east exposures. Rock impactdebris nust also be consid.ered. (see text).
";.u
\".r' ,;
'l1:-
t\
-
=.''-. -.- .;
F*l
.1s
t
a
I
\-'t,
-^<
i'.i
I\
s
)lll
rl
'f.
+
-.n
o
_r.
J,
!f
I
(
{
AA\{7
0)('!odO
CSFqro
tr -l
a.r0e
-l '-l =.{!
=q+P '-lt3
r-r c)d+tdo(dEao3 O .rl(J P'dHXgh o ..1
t:
I
i't'
I
IfLo
on\f. 4-rCFq
wd,rU
_t
7;->(;
70>U
^_ rl!d' .rrtt-)
_9 i{
Z
J
IL
rll
f)
h
///
&"
',%f'j,14,
:
2 V 1.,
/t;l' :,:', ::: 7 |.. ,....',.+4+<./r:,.ii%Z.
Wfu
'l,fl(rui'lmw
ilryffil
'1//k!4{iTilt
,.
vifrI
it/..14r2,
'r.%h
I
.
I
II
it
I
I
I
I
I
:I
I
il
i
n
t
Il
It
I!
II
II
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
tli
=ilail
fl
u\ll
.'ll.l-tl
dti
,Jrll
'l
o+
d
a
x
c)
a
c)
dq{
l.{
V)
.-t
Fld.B rl.\
+olFl
(/.) -o
F.o
.-r q-r
trl vl& ..1
HC)
ll.,---|
Lfrt
r1--ll
ll
SC
- \t-:
l-9
s89iJC
_ ll _r,
--i1tlll
ll
I
1
I llrrlt
-. !
I
I
I
I
II
it
tl
il
I
t
I
l
iI
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
iI
I
!I
I
I
I
II
i
I
l'
i
I
rl
+
cl
- --lt
--rl
,---l.1
1t
3
-1qr
a.rl
.o
o)d
l-)
E
a)aopr
xq)
a
c)O
.d.H
=a
+a
(g
trl
(\t.
HCEO
IIi I rr
- ---.1 l-r I--ll
-- - - -Ll
l-rt
ll tl
I
l
I
J
{1-{l tlI l--ti--t.l
ll
--il
t-l _:-- l
il
T
I
I
{
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Mark Cadmus
Brandess-Cadmus Real
28i Bridge Street
Vai1, C0 81657
February 7, l9BB
HAZARD MATR]X
Snow Aval Debris -:.vaL Debris Flor.r Rockfall
Mode rat e
No
Mod e rat e
Mode rate
Mode rate
No
No
No
No
Yes
l"lode rat e
Mod erat e
llode rat e
Mod era t e
No
Mode ra t e
Moderate
Mode ra te
No Modera te
Study of the hazard natrix indicates that none of the 5 lofs are affected by
high hazard snow avalanche, debris flow, or rockfall; only Loc 6, l0th Fillng
is affected by debris avalanche.
HAZARD DEF]NTTIONS
Snow avalanche
-ModerateHazard:ReachedbysnowavalancheswithreEur-n-q9ti?d",-of25
years or more, and avalanches produclng inPacc pressures ot b't) 10s/rt- or
less, Building is permittLd bnt. Ltt.lat.he defense design and/or
structural reinforcement naY be needed.
o
INC.
Dear Mr. Cadmus:
At your request, I have completed a reconnaissance of snow-avalanche, debris-
avaianche, debris-f1ow, and rockfall hazard at the 5 Vail Lots discussed
be1ow. The work reported here constigutes "site-specific" appraisals of
these lots with respeCt to the geologic hazards listed above ' other geologic
hazards or developnent constraints, if any, have not been considered as part
^F lL.a ^ ^ F,.1..(JI LltlD JLuu'.
HAZARD MATRIX FOR THE 5 LOTS
Ihe 5 lots studied are li-sted in the left coiunn in the natrix below' The
lots are affected by various combinations arrd severities of tirc 4 geologic
hazards listed above. Snow avalanche, debris ilow, a i.<i rockfall are rated as
"moderage", or "high" hazard. In accordance vrith crireria adopCed..by the
Town of Vail , d eb ri s-avalanche poEential is j.dentif ied ("fes" or "No"), but:
not broken down into high and moderate caEegorles'
Lot if
lll, Jto r].rrng
uJt JLv
ll4 , 3rd Filing
/ri3, 3rd Filing
/16, lOth F11ing
E^t-F^ T-^!D LCLtrCt rrr\-.
ARTHUR I. MEARS, P.E.,
Natural Hazards Consultanb
222 Eart Gorhic Avc.
Gunnircn, Glorado 81230
J01 - 641.3216
Mos Waling . Amlonchu ' Aulanchc Contml Engiaecing
t
I
t
l
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
Snow avalanche (cont )
- High Hazard:
than 25 years,
615 lbs/frz.
zone.
Debris Avalanche
Reached by snow avalanches with return peri.ods of less
and/or avalanches producing impact. pressures of more than
The Town of Vail does not permit building in this avalanche
- Because debris avalanches consist' of water, wet snow, mud, rock, andorganic debris, they can be dest.ructive all the way to their outer edges.
They also stop in short distances in the runout zones, thus high and
moderate hazard zones cannot be defined, Hazard zones can be shortened by
bui.lding energy-di s si pa ting barriers (berms or dams), perpendicular ro theflow direction, thus avoiding encounter altogether.
Debris Flow
- High Hazard: These areas can experience severe st.ructural damage andpossible loss of life through irnpact of nud, rock, and debris. Buildingis usually not permitted in these areas because struccural protection is,in general , not feasible.
- lloderate Hazagd: These areas can experience property dar.age throughflooding, erosion and irrpact of muddy vracer, soi!-, rock, aad debris.
Buiiding is permitted by the Town of Vail because rrocect.ion of buildingsi-s easily achieved through various combinatiors of lovr barriers,
reinf orced lower f oundacions and r'ralls, and avoidaice of wincor^r openingsat grade.
Rockfall
- High Hazard: These areas are located on or below steep slopes chac
produce or maintain destructive rockfall , Rock impact r^'ith s:ructures is
1ike1y to cause severe damage, including penetration of buildir-g wa11s.I
I
II
iI
II
i
II
II
iI
:
- ModeraE.e Hazard,: These areas are
rolling rocks and will rarely be
protection of bqildings, if necessary,
SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENI CONSTMINTS ON LOTS
locaEed near rhe outer limlts of
reached by rockfall. Structural
is easily acconmodated into design.
The following opinions on the constrainEs t,o development on the 5lots result
from ny field inspections of the Lots conducted on January B and February 6,
l9B8 and from experience gained on analysis of avalanches, debris flows, and
rockfall in the Vail area during the past l5 years. Specific design criteria
used for t.he safe construct.ion of exposed struclures, including design loads,
cannoE be provided at the present Eimc. Such design criLcria requlrcs
knowledge of:
Struccure localion and orientaclon;
Structure size and shape; and
Structure details that nay affect the geologic process.
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t*:J+-::g-!1l+g will be exposed ro lighr flow and/or powder blasc f rom t.heuluDnouse Gul-ch" avalanche path during urajor dry-snow avalanche conditlons.Debris flows may also reach the site, but will tonsist onry of muddy water
1nd floating vegetative natter of insufficient mass to create structural-damage. The avalanche hazard can be uritigated by proper buildingorientation, rvindow and door design, and possible local ieinfoicement. Thi;additional work would probably constitute a small percentage of the totalbtrilding cost.. Debris-flow mitigation nay not be required, but in any casecould easily be accoruplished through landstaping
Lot 5, 3rd Fllin8 is exposed ro det,ris flowand requiring sinrilar mitigation, if any.the fringe of rockfall- hazard and probablyproEection from rockfall .
similar to thar affecring Lo! 7,
The building site is located onwould not require s trucE.ural
However, it is also exposed to light flow and/or powde.r blast pressures fromavalanches beginning on the steep, norLh-facing "iop" above sunburst Drive.Avalanches of a size and energy sufficient co c"u"e at least some rninordamage may occur e.very 50-to-100 years, and structural proEection isjustified. The dvalanche hazard, can be mirigated by pioper buildingorientation, r','indow and door design, and possible 1oca1 reinforcement.
Lot 4, 3rd Fi1in8 is exposed to debris flow and rockfall similar to Lot 5.
Loc 3, 3rd Fiiin8 is exposed to debris flow and rockfalr simiLarand 5, as described above, This 1ot is, hor.rever, closer to
r^ f ^ts- l.
FL,^
a lchough
fhrnrrc'h
avalanche path thac af f ect.s Lot 4. consequenE.ly, aval.anches here,also rare (estimated 25-to-50 year reiurt period), definitelystructural nicigation. liitigation can easily be accomplishedattention to building f orm, st.rength, orientaE.ion, and locatlon.
Lo! 6' I0th Filing is exposed to sma1l snow avalanches, ninor rockfall, anddebris avalanches. Snor.r avalanches have reached to within approximately 150feet of Fairway Drive above the western portion of Lot 6 during che pascseveral lvinters. Larger avalanches can cross the road. Rockfall has alsooccurred and deposited on the steep slopes approximately 200-300 fee! aboveFairrvay Drive, and could reach the building site, particularly if the fores!were removed or destroyed. Debris avalanches, during extreme conditions,will also deposit in Fairway Drive. Joint structurat mitigation of Ehe snow-avalanche and rockfall hazard i.s feasible here. Debris avalanches canprobably be stopped .before che building siLe is reached, thereby eliminatingthe hazard. The f orrn and shape of the building will detennine is mitigationis feaslble on this Lot.
The site reconnaissance conducted for this study indj-cat.es that. developmentis feasible, wich sone resErictions, on all 5 lots considered. please
contact me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
ArF}."-Tv^--^.rlFI. llecllSr I..C..