HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL DAS SCHONE FILING 1 TRACT C LOT 1 FIRST BANK 5 OF 6 LEGALProjectApplication
Date _
P roject N ame :----------------------~:c_---------------
Project Description :_
Contact Personan dPho ne
Ow ner,Ad dressand Ph one:_
Architect,Address andPhone:
Legal Descrip tion :Lot ,Block ~Filing ,Zo ne _
C omm ents :_
DesignReviewBoard
Date _
J
M otionby:
Seconded by :----'-I_I -'--~_=_=...:_
APPRO VAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:_
T own Planner o Staff Approval
D ale :
/
I
lh.printery 'va ,1
:..,
.•'1-:"...--.
-~:;;J~;;';'....'..-
"....
...~~
APPLICATION DATE:OG"tOf)E..J(.,~/?8j .:~.::;;
DATE OF ORB i1EETIliG:Oca)'~Q 4 t l~80~__'~~
..\'~:.~
;.';~7'
'.-~."'..•_-"u_..........;'.-.......-.............
...~~.
•••;'-!'.
•
,
.;.:;;.~.;~
A pre-application meetingwith a planning staff member .is strongly suggestedto .':;-:".~
datermt ne if ariy additi ona I i nformati on is needed.Nc appl.i cation _w.i.ll be accep ted ....~~-S .
unless it is comp l'e te (must include all items required by the zoning adm .inistrator).'""~~~1
It isthe applicant's responsibility to make anappointmentwiththe staff tofind-..":;,;.,.:
outabout additional submittal requirements.Please note that a COMPLETE applica-;".:>:f.;::;
tion will streamline theapprovalprocessforyour project by decreasingthe number -~~
of conditions ofapproval that the ORB may stipulate.ALL conditions ofapprovalmust .<~*
be resolved befo.rea building permitis issued.··:..-~::d
.".....~.~,~~
A.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LX-rtiLL.O (,.1:£'J \~l "-.J&Of=CC\MI\A.vt.U!\L··"..;."..:::..
12Ul/.....-\)\"?lCCAIE.A\N U7l N Q 1 :r~fu~JAGf.tZ.DAS?
-...
•
ORB APPLICATIO N /
*****THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBt1ITTED*****
I.PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:·
\I ML
B.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL :
Legal Description :.....:::::::...:::====:-%if-Ge-*-::===+-Fil i ng _
te1ephon~&3)47'_"38?O-'f
\}~Cf,"u.s \'Y tAJT'(
tele phon e<J..o ~41(,-38?O
Zoning C~AA.UUCl A ('
C.NA r1E OF APPLICANT :\J"\L :±'<H_Quvl,S G.W\f~\IJG,
Address 2Z..,H NeUH frLoNTA~f..to,.\?\JAlC--(0 8(b$7
;(
D.NAN E OF APPLICA NT'S REPRESE NTATI VE:~f_l.\~CJ..j~flsL.!::u...~-'\'uW'9='flJL=l::..S'---~~"""-=..........~"'-I.
\
Address Z2..A.\~o(;nA-~W2\C::k X,Op,9 (VI\\L..)Co«8lb57
E.NA~lE OF OWNERS:\1 1'\\L.:*U>."-.SZ.S 6:ov\,I \f0C .
Signature ~~..(\h .£'f (~lU.J\\S>VJr
Address 2.Z.~~\...\Ottl.\:U&N!1'<2L U:>t'yS>1 "tllL 1 CO,8lLSJ telephon e0=D3).,1.7'-"3 89 0
F.ORB FEE:The fee will bepaid at thetimea building permit is requested.
VALUATIO N
$0-$10,000
$10.001 -$50,000
$:.50.001 -$150.000
$150.001-$.500.000
$500.001-$1,000.000
$Over $1,000,000
FEE
$10.00
$25.00
$50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDI NG ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE ORB:
1.In addition tomeeting submittal requirement s.the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners.Trees that will be removed
should also be mar ked.This work must becompleted before the ORB visits the
site.
2.The review process for 'NEW BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetings
oftheDesign Review Board,soplan on at least t wo meetings for their ,approval.
3.People who fail toappear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meetingand who havenotaskedfora postponement will be required tobe
republished.
i •
.'
4.The followingitems no longer have tobe presented tothe Design Review Board.
They,however,have tobe presented tothe Zoning Administrator for approval:
a.Windows.skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing planeofthe building;and
b.Building additions that arenot viewed from any other lot or publicspace,
wnich have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition;and/or approval from the agent for,or manager ofa condominium
assocta tton ,
5.You may berequired.toconduct Na tura1 Hazard 5tudiesonyour property.You shou1d
checkwitha Town Plannerbeforeproceeding.
Innat~_
Michael Pharris
Vice President
221 1 NorthFrontage Road.Vail.Co lo rado 8 165 7
VAIL 303-476-3890 •TOLL FREE HlDO-S43-2814•FAX 3 03-476-2821
ASU B SID IARY O F VA ILH OL DINGS GROU P INC
,.
.,,"-~.--..,.-
t~':~
"·7.~.........
.--...
......:=:«!
..
...
MATERI AL TO BE SU8MITTED
I.NE WCONST RUCTIO N
A.Topographic map and site planof site containing the following (2 copies):
.-.".......=
..::,~..-
...-
..',-....;~~
3.
4.
Exis ti ng trees or ~roups of trees having trun ks withdiameters of 4"or more
one foot above grade.
Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders,
intermitten~streams,etc.).
.-..-r
5.Avalanch~areas,100 yearflood plain and slopes 40%ormore,i f applicable.
6.Tiesto existing benchmark,either USGS landmark or sewer invert.
Z.Locations of the following:
___~.Propo sed surface drai nage on and off site showi ng size and t ypeof
cu lverts,swales,etc.
b.Exact l ocationsofa ll utilities to i nclude existi ng s ources and proposed
service lines from sourcestothe structure.Utilities to i nclude:
cable TV
Telephone
sewer
water
gas
electric
c.Property lines showing distances and bearings anda basis ofbearing
d.Proposeddrivewayswith percent slope and spot elevations
e.Alleasements
8.Existing andf inished grades.
9.All existing andproposed improvements including structures,landscaped areas,
service areas,storage areas,walks,driveways,off-street parking,load ing
areas,retaining walls (with spot elevations),and other site i mprovements.
10.Elevations oftopofroof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath)to
determine height of build ing.
B.A statement fro m each utility verifying location of service and avai lability.To
besu bmitted with site plan.
C.Prelim inary tit le report toaccompany all submittals,to insure property ownership
..anda ll,easementson property.
D.Landscape Plan(1"=20'or larger)-2 copies
1.Show the location of 4"diameter or vl .a rqe r-trees,'other 'shrubs .and-native olants tl:
are onthe site andthe location and design ofproposedlandscape areas with
the varieties andapproximate sizes of plant materials tobe planted.~
2.Complete landscape materials list.
3.Designate trees tobesaved and thosetobe lost.
NOTE:As much of the above information asposs ible shou ld occur on the site plan,so that
the i nter-relationof the various components is clear.The landscaoeplanshouldbe
separate.The existing topographic andvegetational characteristics may bea separate
map.The applicant must sta ke the site to show lot lines andbui lding corners.Trees
that will be lost during construction mustbe tagged.The work shouldbecompleted
before the ORB site visit.
E.~_ArGhitectural Plans (1/8"=l'or larger)2copies
1.Must include floor plansand all elevations asthey will appear on completion.
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades.
2.Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be specified and submittedfor
review on the materials list available from the Department of Co~unity DeveloP-
ment.Color chips,siding samples etc .•shouldbe presented at the Design Review
Board meeting.
"-.
F.The Zoning Administrator andlor ORB may require thesubmissionof additional plans.
drawings,specifications.samplesand other material (including a model)if deemed
necessary to determine whethera project will comply withdesign guidelines.
.t.HINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photosor sketches that clearly indicate what is proposed and the location (site plan)
ofproposal may be submitted in lieu ofthe more formal requirements givenabove.as
longastheyprovide all important specifications for theproposed including colors and
materials tobe useti ..-
:I.ADD ITrONS -RES IDENTIAL OR Cm·lI-1ERCIAL
A.Original floor planswith all specifications shown
B.Floorplan for addition -2copies
C.Site plan 'showing existing andproposed construction -2copiestapas
D.Elevations of addition
E.Photosof existing structure
F.Specifications for all materials and color samples on materials list available at
Department of Community Development
At the request ofthe Design Review Administrator you may also be required tosubmit:
G.Statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability.See
attached utility location verification form •
.H.Site improvement survey,stamped by registered professional surveyor.
I.Preliminary title report,verifying ownershipof property and lists ofeasements.
IV.FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building permit hasbeen issued.and when the project is underway,the following
will be required before any building receives aframing inspection from theBuilding
Department:A certified improvement surveyshowing:
A.Building locations with ties to property corners,i.e.distances and angles.
B.Building dimensionsto nearest tenth of foot.
C.All utility service lines as-builts showing size of lines,typeof material used,
and exact locations.2 copies
D.Drainage as-builts.2 copies
E.Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
F.All property pins are tobe either found or·set and stated on map •
..
.-:-'.J....~
....-....-
.~
'!'"••
G.Alleasements •
H.~uilding floor elevations and roof ridge elevations.
"UST OF r·IATERI ALS
.:./Ai·IE -OF p;\OJECT:CH~/IA.()Nl)(C~UJU.S .s"jS"~\'-.I&COST'd...(~,'3 N~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT.-:---:-r--__8LOCK FLUNG _
STREET ADDRESS:zzrt \Nal(X!,,!.Bo t.!TAS::L '£0 b;'2 \I t,,;lL.Co.8'k57
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:/1
.....~
".-"~?".
.\.",".•,p_....
The fa 11 OI~i nginforma ti on is requi red for submitta 1bytheapp1i cant to the DesignRevi ew
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A.BUILDHIG j·1ATEiUALS :TYPE OF ~lATERIAL
Roof
(0ing )
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Slippery Roc k SWl033
COLOR
Windows
~n dO W Tr 3
Doors
Door Trim
'Qn d or ~
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
Samples approx imate theactual oamt coklf
-only available InDeco rator Cokws
PROPOSED TREES
B.LANDSCAPING:Name of Designer:
phone:
PLAiH i·1A TERIALS:........,Botani ca 1 Name
~
EXISTI1IG TREES TO _
BE REi·lOVED
_~/~7
Com mon Name Quani tv Size*
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height for conifers.
.(over)
-0::-'-•-.
;-...
.PL MT :'fATERI';LS :
(cDn't)
SH RUBS
EXI STI NG SHRUB S
TO BE REi,lOVE D
GR OUi:D COVERS
SOD
SE ED
~Iam e CD ~on Name Qu an;t"Size .....,........~
Souare Footac e
TYPE OF
IRR IGAT IO N
TYPE OR METH OD OFEROSIONCONTROL -----------------~"""--
C.OTH ER'LANDSC APE FEA TURES (retain ing wa lls,fences,swimming pools,etc.)Pleasespeci fy.
ZO NE CHE CK
FOR
SFR,R,R PIS ZO NE DIS TRICTS
DAT E:
LEG,;L DESCRI PTI ON:\lot Block Fil i ng
ADDRESS :~----------
OWNE R \Ph one
AR CH IT ECT Phone--------
ZONE DI STR ICTPROPOSEDUSE ----->.;S:------------
LOT .SJ ZE ._..~__--------
Pro po sed
\
(3 00)(00)
(90 0)(1 00)
(50)uoo
(25 )(5 0)
(200 )(400)
(30 )(33)
20'
15 '
All O\'re d
Mechanical
Air lock
Storage
Sol ar Hea t
Sides
Re ar
Envi ronment a 1/Hazards:Ava 1anche +_
Heigh t
Pr i ma ry GRFA
Credi ts:Gar age
Water Course
Drive :Slo pePe rmitte d ------------
Seco ndaryGRFA
To tal GRFA
Set backs:Front
Lan dscaping
Fen ce/Retaining ~all He ights
Pa rking
Site Co verage
Flood Pla i n ~-------------
Slope +----_
Wetl ands ---'~-----
\Co mmen ts:--------------------------------------';--------
Zon ing:Approved /Disappro ved
Date:
Sta ffSig nature
UTILITY LOCATIC::VERIFICATIC::
SUBDIVIS .c
JOB NAHE_~:--_
ADDRESS """:-_
LOT ----";:-BLOCK FILI~:G\--------
DateAuthori=ed Siznature
Upper Ea gle Valley Water &
Sanitation District
476-7 480
Fred Haslee
Herita ge Cablevision T.V.
949-5530
Gar yJ ohnson
Holy Cross Electirc Assoc.
949-5892
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Public Service Company
949-5781
Gary Hall
Western Slope GasCo.
1800 92 2-t98 7
Harry Mo yes
Hountain Bell
468-6500
The location of utilities.whether they be main trunk lines or proposed lines,
must be approved and verified by the followin g utilicies for the accompanying
site plan.
NOTE:These verifications do not relieve the contrac or of his responsibility
to obtain a street cut permit from the Town of ail.Department of Public
Wor ks and to obtain utility locations before dig ing in any public righ:-
of-way or easement in the Town of Vail.A b ui ~ci g permit is n ot a str eet
cut permit.A street cut per~it must be obtained eparately.
This form is to verify service availability and location.
This should be used in conjunction with preparing your
utility plan and scheduling installations.
*(Please bring a site plan when obtaining Upper Eagle
&Sanitation signatures)
--"------
LEGAL VE :~S.:IU PT I ON~
A PAR CEL 0 ['LAND LYING WITHIN A RESUBDIVISION OF VAIL DAS SCHONE
FIL ING NO.1.AND VA IL DAS SCHONE FILING NO .3.COUNTY m·EAGL E.
STATE OFCOLORAD O.HORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLU JWS:
BEG [NN ING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL .ALSO BEING A
POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CHAMONIX LANE AND THE
NORTHWEST CORNE R OF LOT 2A.RE SUB DIVISIONOFLOT 2.VAIL DAS
SHONE FILING NO.3;THENCE S 19·46 '40 "E420 .66 FEET TO A PO INT
ON THE NORTH RrGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO.70
FRONTACi E ROAD:THENC E ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LitlE ON THE
FOL LOWItI G THREE COURSES:1)S 52·0 2'56"W 62.0 0 FEET;2)S 69°.
5 4'16"W 274 .90 FEET:3)S 46·04'45 "W 45 .08 FEET TO THE
SO UTH EAST CO RNER OF THE COLLINS-WIRTH SUBDIVISION.THENCE AL ONG
THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDI VISION N 39 ·52 '53 "W 171.75 FEET TO
A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CHAHONIX ROAD :THENCE
ALONG SA[D RIGHT OF WAY ON THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES:1 )2 45.63
FEET AL OtlG THE ARC OF A 194.4 FOOT RADIUS CURV E TO THE LEFl'WHOS E
CENTRA LANG LE I S 72°23'01 "MID WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N OS ·0 2'.
:31"E 229.n 2 FEET:N 28·09'00"W 98.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHRIGH TOF WAY LINE OF CHAMONIX LANE:THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID
RIGHT OF vi A'[LINE THE FOLLO WING THREE CO URSES:1)N39 ·43'00 "E
88 .0 4 FE ET:2l 59 .57 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A75 .00 FOOT RADIU S
CUR VE TU THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 45·30'29"AN D WH OSE
LONG CO RD BEA RS N62°28'18"E .58,02 FEET;3 )N 8 5°13 '33 "E
21 4.:34 FEE T TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.SAID PARCEL ALSO BEHl G
KNO WN AN D DESC RIBED AS VAIL DAS SCHONE SUBDIVISION-TRAC T "K ".
EXCEP T:
CO NDO MINIUM UN ITS 401,403.405 .408.409 .412.413.416.417.
420 .421,424 .425.428 .429.43 2.433.436 AND4.17 .I NN AT WEST
VAIL CO NL'O HIN IUHSACCOR DING TO THE COt IDO MINIUH HAP 'THEREOF AND AS
DEFINED AN D DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATI ON RE CORDED
NOVEM BER 15.1983 IN BOOK 372 AT PAGE 8 65.COUNTY OF EAG LE.STATE
OFCOL ORAD O.
PA HGE L B:
CUt IDOM IN IU H UNITS 401.103.405,408.409.41 2.41 3 .416,417.
420 .4 21.424.425,428.429 .432.433.436.AND 437.INN AT WEST
VAIL CO NI:'O MINIUH MAP THEREOF AND AS DEFINED AND DE SCRIBED IN THE
CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECOR DED NOVEHBER 15.1983 IN BOOK 372
AT PAGE 865.COU NTY OF EA GL E.STATE OF COLORADO.
/LEGAL .DESCRIPTION:
THAT PA RT OF COMMERC IAL TRA CT "C"A RESUBDIV ISION OF VAIL DAS
SCHONE.FILING NO .1.EAG LE COUNTY.COLORADO.DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:BEGINN ING AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID COMMER CIAL TRA CT
"C".SAID SOUTH CORN ER BEING ON THE NORTHWESTgR LY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF iNTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO .70;THENCE N 35"35 '37"W.A
DISTAN CE OF169 .16 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
CHAM ONIX ROAD.80 FEET WIDE:THENCE N 44·14'09 "g .A DISTANCE
OF 122.66 FEET;THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE.S39 ·52 '
53 "E.ADIST ANCE OF 171.75 FEET TO THE NORTHW ESTERLY RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF SAID INTERST ATE HIGHW AY NO.70;THENC E SOUTHWES TERLY
ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE,ADISTANCE OF 135 .00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.COUNTY OF EAGLE .STATE OF COLORADO,
~
J
-<
e
~-1
I\\-g
~
~
'"'"'
"
r
L ANDSCAPED
@------
tit
BUILDING
"
NO RfH
~·..WALK .".
.............................,
-~~
-....................<,
~\
\
DECK
I
I
I
I
_-------1-----\-----
IS 'DRAINAGE \AND ///,//
1=
l Ei
I
I
I
I
,,
.
.'.CO~CRE T£:..J.".
CONCRE TE 'DECK '
CONDOMINIUM
L ANDSCAPED
~
--------------~~~----
__-;-~R GE ---------__.i->-,-RDCKS -'~,I e--------..._-/__----ITypr ----------------·
------------------------:.::..::::::-----»>»>:..---",.-",...-//
»>:/'/-/.-.------.-/'
//'
•
"
"
--.............)
I
"-,-,-....,
......................._-----~---""I
I
/
I
I
/
I
~__--I ••
.--.-
"-I
\
\
\
\'>-......."'''"X »:>:'./'
->-~'~
./""",
\'
----~-
1-----------_------
\\I TEL EPrlONE
\'~PEDESTAL
,\\L _----~~/:f!TAR Y SE WER------11 MA NRo!Itr1'P ~-:
\\.--=:-:::..-/'
STOP ,,__
SIGN O 24 .--:'/'\/-----?!t--::::::::/BASIS or ELEVATION:
I -----1';_----__-:::-<-:MH C-127
/.,..--...-//.-/------RIM ELEV.7923 .53'
//.-_-/\INV IN 7908.21'/_-.-;//~("n\
--,...,......-f r:.,;.~!..,i
.o~\f.
c,01'1;JI
May 2,1984
Kristan Pr it z
------------'To wn-of Vail
Officeo fCommun it y Development
75 So uth Frontage Road
Vail,CO 8 1657
Dear Kris t an:
Mr.St u Sack s has fo rwa rded you r le tter o f April30 t ome
a lo ng wit ht heminu tes of t he meet in g of Ju ne 13 o ft he
Plann ing andEnvironmental Comm is sion.Please bea ss ure d
t hat we will paint the new antennae sys temon the Chamoni x
Corn ers bui lding with a dull li ght paint in c ompli ance
with your r equest by Jun e1 ,1984
Conc erningt hematter o ver the old t oweron the Vail Run
building,around April 16I sent ac r e w t o the building with
th ei n structions to r emove that structure atop the build ing.
We were informed byt hemanager,Mr.WilliamFle icher,that
heco nside re d this to bea proper ty o f Vail Runandden ied us
a ccess to r emove th e tower.I did at this time inform Mr.Fleicher
of the requi rementby the town of Vail that the tower be r e-
moved.He,however,c ontinued to decline our peopl e a cce ss to
r emove th es aidtower.I ex~la i ne d to him that i f h e wi shed to
r etain that tow er he wouldhavet o wo rk o ut a n a greementwith
the t own of Va il.I then told Mr.FleicherIf elt my
obliga tion was then c omp leted a ndheag re ed.Accord ingly,
Kristan,we c anf eelno furthe ro bligation toward th is tow er
a s we now f eel that i ti s t he propert y of VailRun and,con-
sequently,their probl em a s to wh ether i t wil l beperm itted.
I a m,of cours e,forwardin g to Mr.Fleich er aco py o f your
r equ es t t o me as well a s th e minute s of the me eting and t hi s
l etter.
Sincerel y,
Wi lliam C.Weber
Dire ctor of Engine er ing
WCW:rf
Encl osure
1000 1I0NSRI DGt LO OP.VA Il.COL ORA DO 81657•(3031 476-KV MT
~l ay 2,1984
Mr.Wil li am F1ei ch er
GeneralManager
Vail Run Building
1000 Lionsrid ge
Vail,CO 81 657
De ar Bill :
Enclo sed is a c opy of a le t te r fro m th e t own of Vai l
as wel l as my resp onse toth em a nd a c opy of th e minutes
of th e Design Revi ew Board .
As I i nfor me dyou i nmid-A pri l,they ha d requir ed us to
remov et hat t owe r.llovev cr ,a t your req uest ,wed id n I t ,
I,the refore,su ggest that yo u c ontactMs.Kr is tan
Pri tz of th et own of Vail at 4 76-7000 a ndwork out s ome
form of a g reement as I now c onsider t his tower t obe your proper t y.
Sincerely,
Hilliam C.Heber
Director of Engine ering
\~CW :rf
Enclosu res
1000 L10 N ~f{I[)GL LOOP .V AIL ,C OLORADO B1657 •UO )I 47&·KVMT
'\
75 south frontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
April30,1984
StuSacks
Program Director
KVMT Radio
2271 NorthFrontage Road West
Vail,Colorado 81657
Dear Stu:
officeofcommunitydevelopment
Re:Removal of Antennae on
Vail Run Building
Ihave enclosed a copy oftheminutesoftheJune13,1983 Planning
and Environmental Commission that concerned KVMT 's request for acon-
dit iona1useper mit tobui1danantennaeonthetopof the ..Cha mon i x
Corners building.The Planning Department requests that you comply
withtheapproval by removing theoldantennae from theVail Run building
and by painting your new antennae at Chamonix Cornerswithadull
paint.This work mustbecompleted by June1,1984.Originally,
KVMT was askedto remove theVail Run antennae by January 1 ,1984.
If you haveany further quest ions,please give me aca11.Thanks for
your cooperation.
Sincerely,
~\~~Q~?~
KRISTAN PRITZ
Town Planner
KP:br
Encl.
MEI1BERS PR ESENT
Dan Co rcoran
Di ana Donovan
WillTrout
J im Viele
ABSE NT
J im f10rgan
Gordon Pierce
Du ane Piper
e --
a ndEnvir onn!en tal
Ju ne 1 3,1 983
STA FF PRE SENT
Dick Rya n
Pe te l'Pa tt en
Peter Ja mar
J im Sayre
Betsy Rosoiack
COUNCI L RE PR ES ENTA TIVE
Chuck Anderson
The mee tin g Vi as call ed toor der at 10 :0 0 ambyDan Co rcoran,chairman.The
firs t itemon the a genda ~I a s t he approva l ofth e mi nutes o f the .me eting of
May 23 ,1983.Corcor an c orre ct ed it em #1 t o rea d "The vote was 5 in f avor"in stead
of4 .Donovan mo veda ndTrou tse condedto a pp l~ve th e minute s as corrected .The
vote was 4-0 i nf avor .The a ppl ica nt f or #4,Lodge at Va il,r equested to table unt il
J une 27 .Trout mov ed and Vi e le s econded t o ta ble .The vot e was 4 -0 to tab l e .
1..Ar e uest t o-I~zo n~_T!:.e.c_toJl_s Cond ominiu ms f rom the Hi..5Lh Dens ity Mu l t ip le FamilY
HDI-1F)zon~_Lsy_i _c _t:_t ~__CD:0lle r cia l i=_C2!:.~JL~of'--~d ist-,=-i .s:.~a nd ~ce_~~s t_f or
a n exempt ionto ~JJ~\·,-__a_J_o_ajJ.~~ilc~w i th i n th e r eguir ed f ront s etback .
App licant :Treetops Con domin ium Associ at ion .-
Pete l"J amar e xplained the me~o andr emindedth e board that t heo r igina l memo of
April 13 ,1 98 3 co nta ined th e r equest,a nd that t he PEC had t abled the requ esti n
order fo r th ea pplicantt o i nv e s ti ga te traff ic and c irculation i mpactsof the pr opos al
o nthe alr eady congested Ea stLi o nshead Circle area .Th e PEC had also askedthe
applic ant t olook at mo ving t he loa ding zo neo uto fth e fron tse tb ack andtol ook
a tthesnow s torageprobl era .Ja mar sh owe da sitepl anhehadr eceived just before
t hemeet ing wh i ch the s ta ff hadnot had ti me to s tudy.The new plan showed a new
l ocation f ora loading s pace anda s now s tora gea rea .Ja mar re ad fr om the t raf fic
s tudy wh ich s tatedtlla t th e i mpa cts of the pr oposa l coul dbea ll eviated by four
l is teditems .He s tated t lla tt here would be no guarantee t hat s ignsor agreements
wou ld stop the use o f sh ort te r m parking .He f elt th at a pedestri an connect ion
between the proposed cO :ii lii erci al deve I opment a nd the Li onshead par king struc tu re
porta l wou l d alleviate so!~e of th epedes tr ian tr avel throu gh th e bus/truck area,
as would the limiti ng of t he t ypes ofuses allow ed in the proposed build ing.
J ama ra lso e xplainedth atth e applicants sugges tedconsolidating the east andwestb ound
bus platform,but tha t th e Transport ati on depar t me nt ga vere asons why t his would
not wo rk .He me ntionedt he f act t hat t het raffics tudy al so s/low ed t hat 42 ~of
t he traff ic int he a rea wa s h om a utos ,and unti lthe re was a solution t o the pr ivate
autoe nte ri ng the area(su ch as aCheckpoint Cha r li e ),noaddit ionalpr oblenls shoul d
be created in th e East Li o nshEad Circle a rea .Hea ls os aid that the staff couldnot
make a r ecomme nd a t i onof a p ~JI"oJd l w i th out f ur the r s tudy of the nel'i plan .
TedStra uss,Pre s ident of the Tr e eto ps Cond omini um As sociation,stated that a t the
l astmeetin g,t hey we re to ld to go back an dhave a tr a ff ic s tudymade,they s elected
a tra ff icen gill e er r ec o ::;:'e ~d C'd by Pet er .Ja :::a r ,and i t was the e ngin eer's ·opinion that
th e traff ic ~att ern int he Ea s tLion sheada rea wou ldnotchange .
·.~e ·'JEC 6/13/83 -5-
Co rcoranasked the neigh bors i n the audience i f they wo uld be infav or of
the TO V trading par t of lot 40 for lot 34inorde r toplace th edayc ar e
center on par t of lot 40.The r esponse f roma llwastha t they were n ot ~
Mor e dis cus si onf ol lowe d concerni ng theexcha nge of pro perties .a nd th en Perkins
re quested to tab le the c~~st unt il July 11 .Viele movedand Don ovan seconded
tot able t he request until ~11.The vote I~as 3-0 ~I ith Corcoran absta ining.
3.Reque st for a c 6nditi~;;1-~-.mit inord er !~)u i l danantenn ae ont he
t opof the Chamoni x ~o r n e r s bui .~d~SG -Rart of Tract C•.~aJJ das Schone Fi ling
#1.Appl~nt :R and LI.orrllll<Hl-rcatio ns,Inc .(K V~l T -FH )
Pe te r Ja mar exp lain ed th at an antennae wo uld be placedon t he Chamo nix Cor ners
Buildi ng i n West Vailtose rv ice the new studi o for KVMT.Bo bDorf ofKVM T answe d
que stion s.Trout suggest ed the ante nnae bepainted ,and Donovan su ggested t hat
thepain t be flat in a l i ght c olof.and t hat the f a cili ti es be r emov ed fromthe
top of t he Vail Run building..
Dono van mo ved a ndTroutsecon ded to aQp rove th e reques t pe rth e sta ff me mo d ated
Jun e6 ,1983 wit hthe cond_iti ons that th e e9-uip me nt R.erta i nJ!1.SL to KVMT ber emo ved
from t hetopof t}~_~~i .~Run ~iJ.5Li-"-g~y Janua.!:Y.-l....J...2.8i,a nd tha tt he a nt E!nnae
t obe constructed on .the Ch amonix Corner s bU ildi ng~.ilinte d l'lith ad ull pa i nt.
Thevote was 4-0 i n favo r.
The Plann ing andEnvironmental Co mmission tookabreakto eat lunc h.
4 .Request for an amen~m en t to Sections 18 .04 .030,18 .22 .090 and 18.2 4.130
i nordertoi ncrease t he numbe r of ac commod ation units al l owed i n t he
CommercialCore Iand the Public f\c c o mrnod.~ti o n zone distri cts .Appl ican t:
Lod ge Properties,I nc.
Co rcoran sta te dt hathehada letter from theappl icant wi t h areq uestt ota ble
th isi tem until the next mee ting .Trout movedandViele secondedt ot able,a nd
thevote wa s4-0 i nf avor of tabl ing.
5.Requ'est f or a var iance fro m Sec tion18.13.080 ffil w hic.!l.-.re stricts_on~un i!.
i na P r im a'!y'/Seconda.!Y.-.3.0.~e__to 40 ~of...!.h..e_51.llO\·~a b l e GRFA on lot 11,BlockE
Vail dasSchone Fil in9 iil .App l ica nts:I.H.a nd T.K .Turnb ull
Jim Sayree xplai ned th e reques tand SusanVaughn ,r e pr c s ent ~ng the Turnbulls,
s tatedtha t the60/40 r ule was t o prev ent mirr6 r ima ges,butth atth ea ddi ti ons
wo uldhelpred uce the present mirro r appearance o ft heduplexbecause the add it ions
would havetobepla ced di ff er ently .The d up le x could remain50/50 and st illchan ge
fr om one o fmirror i ll Jage .•
,.
,r'II e.eIIf-~MI\'~~:
t+
f+SDDr:I',w.'d ~.Qt\rtlN\)~~-\\1l\\M ~01 ~
,t',~\.o.C\~~~-IIU CMd.lASt ~m't.
ll ~~\~{\1Ii,Q 'roo a~o&lIDl a\1aPeJ aAr~1
;~D\).S'oJMack.d ")/;l/Tl Orcl.~)~T?"'0 _
I,CnN\.'~'(B,\'-\\I\:lrb ~~c \};\\~1
l.
11--\\\..\1\'\~i;~~vl9-h I\~o1~-~~.r-\'/\01 ~~~(.•U
L
fit
11+
I
II
~
I
j
Date --1-t""-~~+-----
ProjectApplication
Proj ect Na me:__-"-'''--'----'-''-_
Project D escr ip tion :-----dz:>,+~........-l.\-':;:>.--~,L\,J,~l_-----------------
Contact Person andPhone 1"15-6~Q;
Y7Ce -]20 1
Ar chitect,Ad dress andPh one :
c..\
Comm ents :_
D ISAPPROVAL
Date ~""-7~7L.--_-DesignReviewBoard
Mot i onby :
Second edby:---J.....:\rt;""-------
APPR OVAL ~-O
Summ ary :--,,---;-_
st--
o StaffAp proval
ProjectApplication
7Date-~,..+l-~+--:!c...-!-----
Pro ject Name:__~~-l.-L-_
,.....~J).",
e.\)'S--PV\\......Contact Personand Phone
Project Descri ption :--------::::F:..L-..:-..l-!....-C.----.;J~.1::T-------------------
Owner ,Add ress and Phon e:.!::....:~...l.l.__---!...2:'...!.Il!l..2._
Ar chit ect,Address and Phone:t
r II,<V 1/\
(A \
C omments:_
7Date---"-r--:....!-...:..J.:...------
DesignReviewBoard
Mo tion by:
Seconded b y:----'-.".!-----':..:....:.....!-L-_
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
\
I /\:,~'-----------------r
~{r \
Sum mary:-:--==--_
Date:
o Staff Approva l
the PrWo le,l'..a ,l
ProjectApplication
Date __-L _
Pro ject Name:_
Project Description:----,,_
Contact Person and Phone
I 1
Owner.Address and Phone:~_
Archi tect,Address and Phone:
Legal D escription :L ot ,Bl ock __--'--__~Fili ng _--'--,Zone ----:"d,.--~_
Comme nts :_
DesignReviewBoard
IDate-'-_
Motion by :
Seconded by :
APPROVAL
)
DISAPPROVAL
JSummary:_
D ate:
o Staff Approval
MEMO
TO :Ri ck Pylman
From:Bill Se pmeier
Re garding:KVMT Satellite Installation :Visual Scree ning
As chief engine er f or KVM T and coordinator of the station 's eff o rts
to c onstr uct a n ew satellite dish a t its studios,I appre c iate
t he town 's approval of our zo ni ng variance request .
Asa condition of t his ap proval,I u nderstandt h at t he Design
Revi ew Board needs further information regardi ng the statio n's
p lans for scree ni ng this dish from view,h ence t h i smemo .
As you know ,t he d ish will be locate d in th e rear par king lot
serving t he studio at 227 1 N .Fr ontage Road West .Exis ti ng hUildings
t o th e East a nd West will h ide the d i sh i n t hese d irection s.
F romt he South,t he dis h wi ll be sc ree ned by t he add ition of a
wood en 'p rivacy fence ',co nst r uct ed in ama nner that wi ll b le nd i n
with th e woo de n fe nce whic h sc reens the adjacent d umpsters an d
tra sh dispos al a rea .T his fence will b e some 10 to 1 2 fe e t i n height
and extend west fro m t he d umpste r sa bo ut t he sa me distance,effectively
hidi ng t he dis h completely fr o m this angle .
From the North ,up o n t he h ills i dea bve t h e location,t he dish will
be screened with the a d di t ion o f so mee vergreen plan ts ,short
trees an d fenc ing similar to that used on t he south s id e.
Since t he d i sh will be o riente d at an angle whi chp res en tsas mall
'fac e'area from t his di rectio n,t his scree ning will min imi ze
any vi ew from t he hom es above t he s ite .
As yo uk now,t he addi t io n of this s ate llite system is vital to
KV MT 's co ntinu ed assu ran c e of q uality n ews,information ,p rogramming
a nd e mergency a ction s ervi ce s to t his commun i ty.I wi ll
assu re you a nd t he Town of Va il that wef eel as strongly towar ds
p reservi ng the visua l asthetic s of th e town as we d o ou r
position in serving i ts communications n ee d s~KVMT will
ass u re t h at t his installatio n is n ot an 'eyesor e'b ut i n st ead
an as set to th e co mmunity .
P l ease f eel f ree t o call up onme if yo uh ave further q uestio ns .
Thank you.
3/5/87
town of vai
75 south frontage road
vall ,colorado 81657
(303)476·7000
April 2,1987
Mr.Dennis Goodman
c/o KVMT
2271 North Frontage Road
vail,Colorado 81657
Re:Satellite Antenna at Chamonix Corners
Dear Dennis:
offIceofcommunItydevelopment
At their meeting of February 2,1987,the Town of Vail Planning
and Environmental Commission approved your request for a
variance from setback requirements and a variance from maximum
size allowances in order to allow placement of a 3.8 meter
satellite antenna in the northeast corner of the Chamonix
Corners property.
Final approval of the Des ign Review Board and issuance of a
building permit will be required prior to installation.
have any questions,please call me.
KVMT FM PROPOSED SATELL ITE ANTENNA INSTALLATION
NOTE :FRONT AND REAR OF ANTENNA WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH
FENCING AND SCHRUB S ...AS NEEDED.
-.-
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
February 23,1987
PRESENT
J.J.Collins
Diana Donovan
Bryan Hobbs
Pam Hopkins
Peggy Osterfoss
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
STAFFPRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylmn
Betsy Rosolack
The meeting was called to order by the chairman,Jim Viele.
1.Approval of minutes of 2/9/87.Donovan moved and Hopkins
seconded to approve the minutes.The vote was 7-0 in favor.
2 .A request for setback and
a satellite receivin
at 2271 h Fron e
in order to install
than the maximum allowed
A licant:Sk -Hi Va il,
Inc.~KVMT RadV
Rick Pylman explained the request and showed photos and a site
plan.J.J.Collins asked how the dish would be screened from the
residents who lived further up the mountain from the dish and was
told it would be screened on all four sides and would be turned
toward the west so that the narrow edge would be visible from
above.Rick explained that this PEC approval would allow the
applicant to proceed to ORB,and ORB would address landscaping and
screening.The PEC concerns regarding the landscaping and
screening could be passed along to the ORB.
J.J.Collins moved and Pam Hopkins seconded to approve the request
per the staff memo dated 2/23/87 with the request to ORB that
there be adequate screening and landscaping.The vote was 7-0 in
favor of the request.
3.Appointment of aPEC member to ORB for the months of March,
April and May.
J.J.Collins volunteered to serve on the ORB and Peggy Osterfoss
volunteered to back him up.
A work session followed concerning the Plaza Lodge,the Lionshead
Centre Building and Hillside Residential zoning.
'-
rt'r
RICHARDS ENGINEERS,IN~
p ,0 ,Bn.C'IOO
Avo n ,Colo rodo 81620
Phon.q4'·~07:l
Donn ,l ino ."'j ·l ~'1
'.~-"..j
CEHT1 I'I CNrl ON-----------
/
fence
S ca le :/":.:/0 '
L EGflL 1lI.::.c i.:I".I l ):l
1\par t 01 Tr a ct "C",Bl o ck tv ,"!le subd ivision of
vail Das S(}lQIlC ,F ilill'J No.1,Eag le Coun ty ,
Co lorado ,IliO l ""1.,Ht ic ul ilr ly d o s cr i b c d as foll ows :
',".~'
Ikgln:lL-.q "tt r.o tJo rtlw as1-crly corne r of,Tract:
"i\"of s a id Bl ock A;th L'n ce N~<1 °14'09"E and a long
I.h(';NC )1·t l:('I-ly l in "of s aid Tra <:t ."C "and a ls o a long
t.t,;~SC lll':IIl >l'I ,;R ''J iot-o(-W.1Y J i r .,,!C:h.,monix Road ,
J 2 ~.()G -[~L'.,;t.I,·,,,,,'e -S <l 2 °')G'~r'.,.:,](,9 .8 4-r N '1:-to-a --
['ob,t o n th c So u t.h c rl v 1 i n o o l s a i d T rac t "C",
wh t ch i ~,.Il ';'l r h o tt o r t uc.r l v l~j(J h t -of -\~a ,/l in e of
t nuc rs t eto Hi '!},w,,';No .7 1);r.li o nc e J ·'2.2 4 f~l>t along
tho!a rc e lf iI b ,UOO .OO f o ot rad i u s c urv o t o the l ef t,
n nd :l in nq ,;'-'I d So u t h ....r lv lim!and ,11 '.'0 a long s a i d
Nor l:h c r !'l I l i'lh~.-l ;f-\·:;'y lin e,s u i d c u r vo h ilvin :J il
c"nt t.,l il ll 'Jle'o r I °2J '30"an d who s o l o nq chord be ars
~'lH o )l 'I 'H "\~l .1:~.;;I)f co t;t o t h o S()lJ t.lw il ~;t c t"ly c o r ne r
o f f.i.lict T L'.,r.t "A",th ence N)C,'3,'37"\'1 a nd along the
E"s te r -l,I i ll :of "ai'll Trac t '.\'.'.1(i I .5 0 f e o t to tho
I 'o int:o f'b ',!qi li ni rl<J,and co nt;j\nillg 21,780 ';Cj u3 re f eet
Ol·:O.SOCO c '~;l L'~'j ,more o r.l os s.
(
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning andEnvironmental Commission
Community Development Department
February9,1987
SUBJECT:A request for setback variance and diameter of satellite dish
variance in order to install a commercial satellite dish at the
Chamonix Corners building in West Vail
Applicant:Sky-Hi Vail,Inc.dba KVMT Radio
1.
II.
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant wishesto install a 3.8 meter (13 ft.)diameter satellite
antenna inthe northeast corner ofthe parcel containing the Chamonix
Corners commercial building,which housesthe KVMT broadcasting studios.
The requested variance is for both allowable antenna diameter and setback
requirements.These requirements are listed as Section 18.58.320 D,4
and6.The zoningcode stipulates that the maximum size ofany satellite
dish antenna installed for usebya single residence or business shall be
limited to9 feet in diameter.Satellite dish antennas are required to
comply with existing setback requirements ofthezone district in which
the dish is installed.The required setbacks intheCCIIIzone district
are 10 feet.Proposed location ofthedish is within 10 feet ofthe rear
property line,andthus requires variance.
Included with this memo is acopyofthe applicant's statement supporting
his request for a dish ofa larger size than is currently allowedthrough
the regulations.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon reviewof Criteria and Findings,Section 18.61.060 oftheMunicipal
Code,the Departmentof Community Development recommends approvalofthe
requested variance based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors:
The relationship ofthe requested variance to other existing or potential
usesand structures inthe vicinity.
The requested encroachment into the rear setback is ap~roximately 4to5Ifeet.The requested location is adjacent tothe existing trash
facilities that serve this parcel.Inreviewofthe site,this appears
tobethe best location for the satellite dish,and we feel that withthe
proposed fencing and screening that the applicant is amenable to,there
will be little negative impacttothe existing or potential usesor
structures in the vicinity.
The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement ofa specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege.
The staff feels that dueto the desire ofboth the applicant and the Town
to achieve maximum possible screening of the satellite dish antenna,that
theproposed site is the best possible location andbecauseof this,it
would notbea special privilege to grant the variance for encroachment
into the rear setback.
With regard tothe request for variance from maximum diameter,the staff
feels that the technical information submitted by KVMT is sufficient to
prove that a9 foot diameter dish as typically usedin residential
installations would notbe able tomeet the technical specifications of
the FCC that would be required for the operation of this satellite dish
for the KVMT radio station.Therefore,we feel that it would notbea
grant of special privilege toapprove the variance ofthe maximum size of
the satellite dish.
The effect ofthe requested variance on light and air,distribution of
population,transportation and traffic facilities,public facilities and
utilities,and public safety.
The location and size ofthe requested antenna will have no negative
impacts upon anyoftheabovementioned criteria.While theproposed
location is adjacent tobotha parking area anda trash facility,the
dish location will not obstruct parking or hinder the trash removal
operations .
III.SUCH OTHER FACTORS AND CRITERIA AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS APPLICABLE TO THE
PROPOSED VARIANCE.
IV.FINDINGS
The Planning andEnvironmental Commission shall make the following
findings before granting a variance:
That the granting ofthe variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified inthe same district.
That the granting ofthe variance will notbe detrimental tothe public
health,safety,or welfare,or materially injurious to properties or
improvements inthe vicinity.
!
That the variance is warranted for oneor more of the following reasons:
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe
specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent withthe objectives of
this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable tothe site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties inthe same zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges
enjoyedbythe owners of other properties in the same district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approvalofboththe setback and maximum diameter
variance requests.We feel that theproposed location is inan optimum
area to screen this dish from adjacent properties and we feel that KVMT
hasproved substantial hardship in request for the size considerations.
We would request the Planning andEnvironmental Commission passalong
their concerns totheDesign Review Board that this dish be adequately
screened from view from adjacent public and private properties asa part
of the ORB approval process.The staff also feels that the applicant
should explore the possibility of utilizing a mesh dish.'
~l'-'5'-'~~'Sc...e..~\~c..
RLv '-""'-;R.J-
o'P DI,91-
.i")•.L,-~T<..~.:»">
i1!}
r l
~!j If 7
Application Date
---~~-+--"'------
PEC MEETING DATE'------+--+-~---'---
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
I.Thisprocedureis required for any project requesting a variance.'The appl ication
willnotbeaccepted until all informationissubmitted.
Sky-Hi Vail,In c .•d .b .a .KVMT Radio
13 /IISame
2 271 N.Frontage RoadWest ,Vai l,Co .
AD DR ESS,_
AD ORES S_='--=--...;.;...;:-.:..-"-'-_-"-_
~~PHO NE 476-5 868rt}~--i'~-------------
f ~~(lA o~.NA ME OF APPLI CANT'S REP RES ENTA TI VE'----''-'-'_-=..,.~~'__'=__
~VI£II~
PHONE Cf Y'l-r].JY-----------------------y 7{.,-.s ;r(,d
C.NAME OF OWN ER(S)(typeor print)_S_a_~_'M_-__::::__-----------Signat ur ~>g ~,l'i~v--e
ADDRESS,_
PHONE-----------------------------
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
2 271 N.Fron ta ge Ro ad WestADDRESS.__---'=:.:::..:...:::.......;:.:....:.--=-.:::-=-=~"'___
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO N LOT C BLOC K A FILI NG 1 EAGLE CO UNTY
E.FEE $100 PAID ~/~/rl CK #3Yb J/'FROM '5/(i )-/,'-!l/<J j{f/);//
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFO RE THE COMMU NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART ME NT WILL ACCEPT
YOUR PROPOS AL.
F.A list ofthe names of owners of all property adjacent tothe subject property
INCLUDI NG PROPERTY BEHIND AND AC ROSS STRE ETS,and their mailin g addresses.
THE APPLIC ANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADD RESSES."SEE REV ERS E
II.A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERE NCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF ME MBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO .;DETERMI NE IF ANY 'ADDITIO NAL INFO R ~1ATION IS NEEDED.NO APPLICATIO N IHLL BE
ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLU DE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONI NG
AD MI NISTRATOR).IT IS THE APPLICA NT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINT ME NT
WITH THE ~TAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS."
,PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATIO N WILL STREAMLI NE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR
YOUR PROJECT BY DECR EASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APP ROVAL THAT THE PL ANNI NG
AND ENVIRO NMENTAL CO MMISSIO N MAY STIPULATE.ALL CO NDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE
CO MPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED .'i ";.
It I.FOUR (4)COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUB MITTED:
A.A WRITTEN ST ATE MENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE
REGULA TION I NVOL VED.THE STAT EME NT MUST ALSO ADD RESS:.
1.The relationship ofthe r equ ested va ria nc e to 'other existing or potent ial
uses and structures inth e vicinity.
2.The degreeto which relief from the striet or literal interpret ation and
enforcement ofa specified regulation isnecessarytoachievecompat ibility
and uniformityoft reatment among sites inthe vicinity orto attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
OVER
Variance
e
-2-
3.The effect ~f the variance on light and air,distribution of population,
transportation,traffic facilities,utilities,and public safety.
B.A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least 1"-20'stamped
by a Colorado l icensed surveyor including locations of all existing improve-
ments,inc luding grades and elevations.Otherelements which must be shown
are parking and loading areas,ingress and egress,landsc~peq areas and
utility and drainage features.
C.A site plan at a scale of at least 1"=20'showing existing and proposed
buildings.
O.All preliminary building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indic ate
the dimensions,general appearance,scale and useof all buildings andspaces
exis ting and proposedonthe site.
E.A prel iminary title,report to verify ownership and easements
F.If theproposal is located ina multi-family development which hasa hom eow..ers'
association.the n wr itten approval from the association in support oft he
project mustbe received by aduly auth?rized agent for said associat ion.
G.Any additional material necessary for thereviewofthe application as
determined by thezoning administrator.,
*For interior modifications,an improvement survey and site plan may be
waived by thezoningadministrator.
IV.Time Requirments
The Planning and Environmental Co mmission meetson the 2nd and 4thMondays'
of each month.Acomplete application form and all accompanying material
(as described above)must be submitted a minimum of4 weeks prior to the date of the
PEC public hearing.No incomplete applications (asdetermined by thezoning
administrator)will beaccepted by theplanning staff beforeor after the desig-
natedsubmittal date.
'Sec tlon 1 -F List of ad jac e nt property.
Adj .East -Rai n t r ee lnn I Cr a dd 0 c-k.De v el 0 pment Co.
22 11 N .Fron t age Rd.,IV .·..J...~L
Vail Co .
Inters tate 70
lVes t 'Vai l Ph illips 6 6 Serv ice S ta t ion
1 -70 /lVe st Vail Ex i~
Va il ,Co
Adj .S outh
.Adj .lVes t
Adj North Va can t Lot (Hi ll s i d e)bc<;.__cL .(O L
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning andEnvironmental Commission ofthe
Town ofVail will holda public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060
of the municipal codeofthe Town ofVail on February 9,1987 at 3:00 PM in
the Town CouncilchambersintheVailMunicipal Building.
Consideration of:
1.A request for an exterior alteration in order toadd more than 100
square feet to the Plaza Lodge building located at 291 Bridge Street on
Lots G,H,I,J,Kand part ofF,Block 5C,Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant:Plaza Lodge Associates,Ltd.
2.A request for an exterior alteration in order toadd more than 100
square feet andfo r a conditional use permit in order to expand an
existing dining deckand construct another dining deck on the Bell Tower
Building located at 201 East Gore CreekDrive on a part of Tract A,
Block 5B,Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant:Bell Tower Associates,Ltd.
3.A request for a setback and size variance in order to install a
satellite receiving dish greater in size than the maximum allowed at
2271 North Frontage Roa~West.
Applicant:Sky-Hi Vai T,Inc .,dba KVMT Radio
The applications and info rmation about the proposals are available inthe
zoning administrator's office du ~ing r egular office hours for public
inspection .
TO WN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THOMAS A.BRAUN
Zoning Administrator
Publ ished in the Vail Trail on January 23,1987.
Variance for satelli te dis h installation -KVMT Radi o.
To :Rick Pylman
From :Bil l Sepmeier
Per our discussion,KVMT Radio proposes to inst all a satellite
receiving dish at its studio location,2271 N.F r ont age Road ,West ,
town of Vail.
This receiver is necessary for reception of state and national news
feeds from the ABC Network ,nation Emergency Action Notification
(Emergency Broadcast System)information ,specia lized prog ramming
and ot her broadcast services to be utilized by KVM T.
Since t his receiver will be uti lized in a n'o n-air'man ne r,cur rent
Federal Co~munications Commission regulations apply r egarding
signal quality and reception clarity .These regulations require
that the dish antenna be at least 3 .8 meters in diameter ,a size
that will insu re proper system performance.
Beca use t his3 .8 m size is in exces so f the 1 2 foot max imum,KVMT
hereby requests this variance .
Note that the dish will be installed in the parking area behind the
bUilding,as we discussed .It wi ll be invisible from the East,South
an d West d u e to the locat ion of the st u dio b u ild in g.T o the North
there is a 15 foot embankment,which will be landscaped i n s uch a fash ion
as to obscure any view of the dish antenna.
Overall height of the dish should remain within the 1 5 foot guideline .
Note also ,3.8 meters co n verts t oa dish d iameter of a pproxima tely
13 f eet ,a size that is n oti n gross excess of current reg u la tions .
Finally,since only the rear of this dish will be visible,KVMT will
paint it in such a manner to augment landscaping efforts to screen it
from view .
Thank you.
1/9/87
Variance fo r satellite dish in s tallatio n-KVMT Rad io .
To:Rick Pylman
From :Bill Sepmeier
Per our disc ussion ,KVMT Radio propo ses to insta ll a sate l lite
receiving dish at its studio location,2271 N .Frontage Roa d,West,
town of Vail .
This receiver is necessary for reception of state and national news
feeds from the ABC Network,nation Emergency Action Notification
(Emergency Broadcast System)information,s pecialized progr amming
and other broadcast services to be u tilized by KVMT .
Si nce th is receiver wi ll be u tiliz ed in an 'on-ai r'mann er,c urre nt
Federal Co~munications Commission regulatio ns apply r eg ar ding
signal quality and reception clarity.These regulations r equire
that the dish a ntenna be at least 3 .8 meter s in diameter,a size
that wi ll ins ure prope r system perfo rmanc e.
Because this 3.8 m size is in exces s of the 12 foot max imum,KVM T
he reby requests this variance.
Note that the dish will be installed in the parking area behind the
building ,as we discussed .It will be invisible from the East,South
and West due toth e location of the studio building .To the North
there is a 15 foo t embankment,which will be landscaped in such a fashion
as to obscure any view of the dish antenna .
Ove rall h eig ht of the d is h s hould r e mai n wi thi n the 15 fo ot gui de li ne .
Note a lso,3 .8 meters converts to a dish diameter of ap p roximately
13 feet ,a siz e that is not in gross excess of current regulations .
Finally ,since only the rear of this dish will be visible ,KVNT will
paint it in such a manner to a ugment landscaping effor ts to screen it
f rom v iew.
Thank you .
1/9/87
Variance for satellite dish installation -KVMT Radio .
To :Rick Pylman
From:Bill Sepm eier
Per ou r disc ussion,KVMT Radio p ropos es to i nsta ll a sate l lite
receiving dish at its studio location,2271 N.Frontage Ro ad,West,
town of Vail.
This receiver is necessary for reception of state and national news
feeds from the ABC Network,nation Emergency Actio n Notification
(Emergency Broadcast Syste m)infor ma tion ,specia liz ed prog ramming
and other broadcast services to b eu t ilized by KVM T.
S ince t his receiver wil l be u ti li zed i na n'o n-ai r'man ner ,curre nt
Federal Communications Commission regulations apply regarding
signal quality and reception clarity .These regulations r equire
that the dish antenna be at least 3 .8 meters in diameter ,a size
that will insure proper system perfo rmance.
Because t his 3.8 m size is in excess of the 12 foo t maxim um,KVMT
hereby requests th is variance .
Note that the dish will be installed in the parking area behind the
building ,as we discussed .It will be invisible from the East,South
and West du e to the location of the studio building.To the Nort h
there is a 15 foo te mbankment,which will be landscaped in such a fashion
as to obscure any view o f the dish antenna .
O verall h eight of th e dish s ho ul d rem ai n withi n th e 1 5 f ootg u ideline .
Note a lso,3 .8 meters converts to ad ish diameter of approximately
13 feet,a size that is not in gross excess of current r egulation s.
Fina lly,since only the rear of this dish will be visible ,KVMT will
pain t i t in such a manner to a ugment landsca pi ng efforts to screen it
from view .
Thank you .
1/9/87
Variance for satellite dish installation -KVMT Radio.
To:Rick P ylman
From:Bill Sepmeier
Per our discussion,KVMT Radio proposes to install a satellite
receiving dish at its studio location,2271 N.Frontage Road,West,
town of Vail.
This receiver is necessary for reception of state and national news
feeds from the ABC Network,nation Emergency Action Notification
(Emergency Broadcast System)information,specialized programming
and other broadcast services to be utilized by KVMT.
Since this receiver will be utilized in an 'on-air'manner,current
Federal CODDunications Commission regulations apply regarding
signal quality and reception clarity .These regulations require
that the dish antenna be at least 3.8 meters in diameter,a size
that will insure proper system performance.
Because this 3 .8 m size is in excess of the 12 foot maximum,KVMT
hereby requests this variance.
Note that the dish will be installed in the parking area behind the
bUilding,a swe discussed.It will be invisible from the East,South
and West du e to the location of the studio building .To the North
there i sa 15 foot embankment,which will be landscaped in such a fashion
as to obscur e any view of the dish antenna.
Overall height of the dish should remain within the 15 foot guide line .
Note also,3.8 meters converts to a dish diameter of approximately
13 feet,a size that is not in gross excess of current regulations.
Finally,since only the r e ar of this dish will be visible,KVMT will
paint it in such a manner t o augment landscaping efforts to screen it
from view .
Thank you.
1/9/87
MEMO
••
TO:Rick Pylman
From:Bill Sepmeier
RE:Technical specifications,KVMT Satellite Antenna
Since KVMT FM is aa licensed commercial broadcast station,
it must adhere to all Federal Communication Commission
rules and guidelines regarding program transmission
quality.These are specified in the Code of Federal
Regulations,Part 73,and are summerized as such:
Measurements of transmitted signal
strength -to -noise levels must
exceed 53 decibels.
Frequency response must remain essentially
flat in a band from 50 hertz to 15,000 hertz.
Imtermodulation and seperation of left
and right channels:1M must be less
than 1 percent total,Seperation must
be kept at at least 40 decibels,minimum'.
While this technical jargan is confusing,translated it
means that the sound must be of as high a quality as
the state of the art will permit.
Now,relating this to the staellite antenna •••
In the last year,the FCC has permitted the 'close-spacing'
of satellites used in the domestic service region,that is,
satellite operators have been allowed to shift satellites
in their orbits,moving them closer together,in order to
operate more satellites in this crowded area of space.
Since all satellites operate on the SAME FREQUENCIES,this
2°spacing has increased the opportunity for interference
in the reception of satellite signals,ESPECIALLY with
small apature (diameter)receiving dishes.Since a smaller
dish has less surface area,it is less selective in the
area of sky it 'looks'at therefore greatly increasing
the ability of other,unwanted,signals to interfere with
the desired product.
2271 North Frontage Road West.Vail ,Col orado 81657•303 /476-KVMT •1-800-843-8471
••
In addition,smaller dishes provide substantially less gain
to the desired signals,lowering the signal to noise
ratio levels.(A 9 foot dish provides only 50%of
the gain of a 13 foot dish.)
Becaus e of the guidelines imposed upon the FM br~dcas t
service to provide a high quality,interference/~fgrral
and due to the limitations imposed upon all satellite
users by the 2°spacing,combined with the Single
Channel Per Carrier (SCPC)format that KVMT's incoming
signals utilize (a format more inherent to noise
pick up and interference than,say,digi tal transmission),
it i s imperetive that KVMT utilize the specified
3.8 meter diameter antenna,as requested in i ts variance
applicat ion in order t o satisfy federal requir ements,
standards of good e ngineering practice,and to assure
a high quality program signal to listeners in its
service area.
Thank You.
Cite:
FCC Rules and Regulations,Parts 73.322,73.1610,2.106.
Scale :/".:':;;0 {
/D ATEF~..24./7'77-~""""i-"-----
\~sce en ing fen ce
\\.
.:,'''',',::.\.:'.':..\~
.''.:..,.~~,
:;'.!:'.~":'.'.".:?l v '~"I:1 ;'~.1 "".
:::'\....,_..,\'~•"\'..•r ,://1:.//",'::"',J~..'
.1l<'(j i ll :li.·.Cj "t;t.r.o l lo nll c';ls t.'cr ly corne r o f'-Tract:
"{I"of s a i cl u l o ckA ;t hcn ce N4 <1°1 4 '0 9"r;and along
L1 11 ';No rt ho r l v I in o o f siJ Ld TliJet "C"a nd a l s o a LonqLh:',~;51 \l ",I.I "'·I \:R:<;ht -e)(-W,1Y ]i r u ,,1'CIl "moni,x Road,
1 2:~1 .(>b Luu::t th~r h 'e S 4 2°']6 's r":;J (,9 .8 4 -'EC'e t ·t o-a ·
p o i iu t on t ile Sout.he rly lin e (JIsa id 'rr ac t "C",
wlli/ell i :;il l ,;,)the r.onlH ,rl y I:i q ll t -of -\~.:I Y l ine of
!Il l:e n ;ta l"H l 'lh .....dY No.7 1);rh c-nc e 1 ·~2 .24 f~l't a lo n e]
t h,;ar c o f il ("Uon .no font rad i us c u r vo t o the l.cf t ,
i ll Hi il io n'!,·...ti d SOll t!lc,r ly li n"an d a l so along sa i d
No rl :h"r l,'Il i'l!l l.-"f -\\;'y l i n o ,fluid c urve huving a
c"nt t ',ll il ll<J I L'o f."l 021'30"arul who s o l onq chord be ars
s .lHo 1 1'(,ll"\</1,1;!.,1 f eet t o t h o Soutlw i'f;t erly c orner
o f :f;i l i ei 'I't·.,r.r "1\",t.he nco N3C;'3."37"\'1 a nd a long t he
I;"s u ,rl,1 in ;o f s a i -d T riJct '.\','.H il.50 f e o t,t o t h e
I'o jlll:of b ,.,qilinin 'J,and co u t a t n i nq 2 1 ,780 ';'1u a r e f eet
or ~().s.()(O i IC 1 L~S ,mo re or l e ss ,
TI part a t Tract "e",Blo ck 1\,t ,!<c';u b d i vi si on of
Va il Das Srhcn e ,l:ili n'J No.L Ca sl e County.
colo radu ,111'.11 '"I'.),t icularly dn scr i be d as f o llow!>:
Ll·:CTlL O!::·CI,il··..I (':1---------_._--
..:.'.'._..J
P,0 ,Bo.C ,100
A>,on ,(olo ndo 8 1620
Phono Q41·5072
Donn,l in.·"13·1531
".~~.:::,':~~:-~I~~:i ':;",.-,
,"'..".~\,I
.,r -.:j {".,'I
':';:.•,,:"..•,I
.-.:r:'••j..-.."-"
~.~.-...,::;:tJ I ~
.,r ,",'.-'.,,.~..'.....~!:~."::
I,\...','c.:.:~......,
I ."•••4 .'•••,:"
".:~",.::.::'.~i .~:..~,
RICHARDS ENGINEERS,IN<;
.............
(PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
February 23,1987
PRESENT
J.J.Collins
Diana Donovan
Bryan Hobbs
Pam Hopkins
Peggy Osterfoss
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
STAFFPRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylmn
Betsy Rosolack
(
The meeting was called to order by the chairman,Jim Viele.
1.Approval of minutes of 2/9/87.Donovan moved and Hopkins
seconded to approve the minutes.The vote was 7-0 in favor.
2.A request for setback and size variance in order to install
a satellite receiving dish greater than the maximum allowed
at 2271 North Frontage Road West.Applicant:Sky-Hi Vail,
Inc.dba KVMT Radio
Rick pylman explained the request and showed photos and a site
plan.J.J.Collins asked how the dish would be screened from the
residents who lived further up the mountain from the dish and was
told it would be screened on all four sides and would be turned
toward the west so that the narrow edge would be visible from
above.Rick explained that this PEC approval would allow the
applicant to proceed to DRB,and DRB would address landscaping and
screening.The PEC concerns regarding the landscaping and
screening could be passed along to the DRB.
J.J.Collins moved and Pam Hopkins seconded to approve the request
per the staff memo dated 2/23/87 with the request to DRB that
there be adequate screening and landscaping.The vote was 7-0 in
favor of the request.
3.Appointment of aPEC member to DRB for the months of March,
April and May.
J.J.Collins volunteered to serve on the DRB and Peggy Oster foss
volunteered to back him up.
A work session followed concerning the Plaza Lodge,the Lionshead
Centre Building and Hillside Residential zoning.
c '
"t .
TO:
FROM:
Planning andEnvironmental Commission
Community Development Department
DATE:February9,1987
SUBJECT:A request for setback variance and diameter of satellite dish
variance in order to install a commerc ial satellite dish at the
Chamonix Corners building in West Vail
Applicant:Sky-Hi Vail,Inc .dba KVMT Radio
()
I.DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant wishesto install a 3.8 meter(13 ft.)diameter satellite
antenna inthe northeast corner of the parcel containing the Chamonix
Corners commercial building,which housesthe KVMT broadcasting studios.
The requested variance is for both allowable antenna diameter and setback
requirements.These requirements are listed as Section 18.58.320 D,4
and6 .The zoningcode stipulates that the maximum size ofany satellite
dish antenna installed for usebya single residence or business shall be
limited to9 feet in diameter.Satellite dish antennas are required to
comply with existing setback requirements ofthezone district inwhich
the dish is installed.The required setbacks intheCCIIIzone district
are 10 feet .Proposed location ofthe dish is within 10 feet ofthe rear
property line,and thus requires variance.
Included with this memo is acopyoftheappl icant's statement supporting
his request for a dish ofa larger size than is currently allowedthrough
the regulations.
l
II.CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon reviewof Criter ia and Findings,Section 18.61.060 oftheMunicipal
Code ,theDepartmentof Community Development recommends approvalof the
requested variance based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
usesand structures inthe vicin ity.
The requested encroachment into the rear setback is approximately 4to5
feet.The requested location is adjacent tothe existing t rash
facilities that serve this parcel.Inreviewofthe site,this appears
tobethe best location for the satellite dish,and we feel that withthe
proposed fencing and screening that the applicant is amenable to,there
will be little negative impacttothe existing or potential usesor
structures in the vicinity.
(
(
l
III.
IV.
The degreeto which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement ofa specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites inthe vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege.
The staff feels that duetothe desire ofboththe applicant and the Town
to achieve maximum possible screening ofthe satellite dish antenna,that
theproposed site is the best possible location andbecauseof this,it
would notbea special privilege to grant the variance for encroachment
into the rear setback.
With regard tothe request for variance from ma x imum diameter,the staff
feels that the technical information submitted by KVMT is sufficient to
prove that a9 foot diameter dish as typically usedin residential
i nstallations would notbe able tomeet the technical specifications of
the FCC that would .be required for the operation of this satellite dish
for the KVMT radio station.Therefore,we feel that it would notbea
grant of special privilege toapprovethe variance ofthe maximum size of
the satellite dish.
The effect ofthe requested variance on light and air,distribution of
population,transportation and traffic facilities,public facilities and
utilities,andpubl ic safety.
The location and size ofthe requested antenna will haveno negative
impacts upon anyofthe above mentioned criteria.While theproposed
location is adjacent tobotha parking area anda trash facility,the
dish location will not obstruct parking or hinder the trash removal
operations .
.SUCH OTHER FACTORS AND CRITERIA AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS APPLICABLE TO THE
PROPOSED VARIANCE.
----~_.--_.._.'..--..--
~HN bTims--"~_~·~i :~.:-:_--:-;L·_~.-;-:~:-:--'-~-:'.:
:-The Planning andEnvironmental Commission shall make the following
findings before granting a variance:
Thatthe 'gr anti rig"of -th-e vari ance wi 11not constitute a grant-of spec i a1
'~r~~il e ge in~on~istent withthe limitations on other properties
classified inthe same district.
That the granting ofthe variance will notbe detrimental tothe public
.health,safety ,or welfare,or materially injurious to properties or
improvements inthe vicinity.
c.
(
l
v.
That the varia nce is warranted for oneor moreof the fol lowing reasons :
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe
specified regulation would r esult in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship i nconsistentwith the objectives of
this title.
Therea re exceptions orextraord inary circumsta nces orcond it ions
applicable to the site ofthevariance that donotapply generally
to other prope rties inthe same zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe
speci fied regulation would deprive theappl icant of privileges
enjoyedbytheownersof other properties in the same district.
STAFF RECO MME NDATIO NS
The staff recommends approval ofboth the setback and ma x imum diameter
variance requests.We feel that theproposed location i sinan optimum
area to screen this dish from adjacent properties and we feel that KVMT
hasproved substantial hardship in request for the size considerations.
We would request the Planning andEnvironmental Commission passalong
thei r concerns to the Design Rev iew Board that th is dish be adequately
screened fromview from adjacent pub lic and private properties asa part
oft he DRB approval process.The staff also f eels that the applicant
should explo re the possibility of utilizing a mesh dish.'
---·~v.-,",U;J /476-KVM T •1-800-843-8 471
I
.(
(
...,.
In addition,smaller dishes provide substantially less gain
to the desired signals,lowering the signal to noise
ratio levels.(A 9 foot dish provides only 50%of
the gain of a 13 foot dish.)
Because of the guidelines imposed upon the FM br~adcast
servic e to provide a high quality,interference/sfg~al
and due to the limitations imposed upon all satellite
users by the 2°spacing,combined with the Single
Channel Per Carrier (SCPC)format that KVMT's incoming
signals utilize (a format more inherent to noise
pick up and interference than,say,digital transmission),
it is imperetive that KVMT utilize the specified
3.8 m(!ter diameter antenna,as request ed in its variance
application in order to satisfy federal requirements,
standards of good engineering practice,and to assure
a high quality program signal to listeners in its
service area.
Thank You.
C ite:
FCC Rules and Regulations,Parts 73.322,73.1610,2.106.
Hopkins abstaining.
Hobbs moved and Schultz seconded to approve the request for a
conditional use permit per the staff memo dated 2/9/87 with the
conditions in the memo.The vote was 6 in favor with Hopkins
abstaining.
3.in order to install a
size than the maximum allowed
licant:Sk -Hi Vail dba
I .
The applicant was not at the meeting,so this item was tabled until the
meeting of 2/23.
4.A request for ann exterior alteration in order to add more than
100 square fee~o the Plaza Lodge building located at 281 Bridge
street.Applicant:Plaza Lodge Associates,Ltd.
Tom Braun explained the request and showed site plans and elevations.
He reviewed the project with respect to the Urban Design Guide Plan,
Design Considerations and zoning.He followed his explanation with the
statement that the staff was not able to support the proposal as
presented and recommended denial.The staff felt strongly that,in its
present state,the existing Bridge street frontage of the Plaza Lodge
building is the essence of what is encouraged in the Urban Design Guide
Plan.
craig Snowdon showed site plans,elevations,perspectives and a model.
He also showed photos indicating that most pedestrians used the street
rather than the sidewalk.Snowdon stated that the stairs and
landscaping were actually a barrier and discouraged the pedestrians
from using the sidewalk.He added that the retail shops were too far
from the pedestrians in the street.Snowdon pointed out that the
proposal would provide a continuous walkway for the pedestrian.The
plan was to line the walkway with lanterns and hanging baskets.
Jack curtin stated that this proposal was similar to the Bell Tower
proposal in that there was not enough landscaping.He felt that the
hanging baskets would only provide some landscaping from mid-July until
September.curtin felt the need for trees for relief.
Jack Campbell agreed with Curtin.He added that much landscaping was
not taken care of or was not the right type for the mountains.He felt
care was important.John Brennan,manager of Vendetta's,spoke in
support of the proposal.
J.J.Collins asked for more information on the walkway and street on
the Bridge street side of the building.Snowdon stated that the street
would be 5 feet wider than it is at present,that about 35%of the
present landscaping would be lost,and that he felt the sidewalk would
be used more when it was at the same level as the street.Collins then
asked the tenants present what their experience was with regard to
PEe 2/9/87 -3-
pedestrian access at present.John Campbell stated that the sidewalk
at present was not used to dodge delivery trucks.He felt that some of
the charm of the Village was that pedestrians were walking in the
street and competing with traffic,unlike Lionshead.He felt that
people liked to walk in the street.It was his feeling that the
sidewalks were used to access shops or to window shop,not as an access
to the street.
George Knox stated that the Rucksack was a good example of pedestrian
access right off of the street and the Lodge promenade was a good
example of a pedestrian barrier.He noted that when people walk past a
shop,they rarely turn around and walk back to the shop.
sally Cornwall of the Younger Generation stated that she has both a
Lionshead store and one in the Village and that people in Lionshead can
walk right in off of the mall,whereas the pedestrians in the Village
were deterred by the stairs.She added that the alley to Wall Street
was used because there were no stairs involved.
Peggy Osterfoss stated that she was basically in favor of the proposal,
and was also in favor of not eliminating the landscaping.She was in
favor of removing the trucks which she felt did keep people out of
stores more than the stairs did.She wanted to hear more opinions on
the proposal because the proposal included such a long expanse of
Bridge Street and she did not want to rush into a decision.Bryan
Hobbs liked the way the proposal changed the street scene but was
disturbed by the loss of landscaping.Diana Donovan felt that there
should be a compromise between what is existing and what was proposed.
She felt the proposal did a lot for the Plaza Building on the Bridge
Street side,but felt the proposal might impact the street too much.
She did not support the enclosure of part of Vendetta's deck,because
they first asked for more deck on Town of Vail land,and now were
asking to enclose part of that deck.
sid Schultz had no problem with the deck,but did have with the retail
expansion.He felt the steps could be redesigned,and added that in
the summer they were highly used.Schultz felt that the Town should
make certain that landscape areas were maintained.He felt that if the
sidewalk is dropped to street level,the trucks would block visibility
of the stores.Schultz stated that a5 foot sidewalk would be 2 feet
in the winter.Jim Viele agreed that the proposal did a lot for the
building.He felt a good job must be done with whatever landscaping
was left.He was not sure if he had enough information to make a
decision,and felt he needed more information on traffic,loading and
landscaping.Viele had no problem with the deck enclosure of
Vendetta's.He added that this was the 7th or 8th modification to the
Plaza Building and felt it must be tough on the neighbors to have
construction every year on the Plaza Building.
Snowdon stated that the majority of the outside work would be done by
July 4.He restated the board's concerns to be the reduction in
landscaping and the nearness of the retail stores to the street.
Snowdon asked if he could separate the proposal of Vendetta's deck from
the proposal on the Bridge street side,and Viele explained that it was
PEC 2/9/87 -4-
postpone the originally scheduled zoningof Spraddle Creek.George Gillett
wantedtoproposeazoneandso the Town agreedto the postponement.Gi lle tt
was supposedtosubmitazone request today.Jay Peterson stated that Gillett
hadnot actually closed onthe property yet and there were many agreements
between Gillett andVail Associates which neededtobe processed.He said that
they would like to come inAugust25th for a work session wh ich would give the
PEC t ime toreview their plans before going i nto expensive engineering plans
for the subdivision.Donovan asked if there wereany guarantee that Gillett
would be the owner byAugust 25 .Peterson answered that there was no guara ntee
but tha t he would beworkingwith the staff to show them what they will be
presenting .Piper was disappointed that the project was not on track.He
asked Patten how far past the deadline for zoningthe property the Town was,
and Patten replied that the property hadbeenannexed 1-1/2 years agoand was
orig inally tobezoned March of1984.The staff agreedtoan extension unti l
January 1986.InJanua ry 1986 the applicant applied for an extension.
Peggy Osterfoss felt that theboardhadto agree toan extension asa pract ical
issue,but that eventually even the attorneys inChicago dealing with this
issue should know that the boardcouldnotbepushed forever.She suggested
zoningthe property on August25.Patten replied that the staff would haveto
publish thezoningintheAugust9newspaperintimetodothezoningonAugust
25.He said that the Town could publish on8/9 the zoningthe town had
previously proposed,Agricultural and Open Space,which would a llow them to
take action on 8/25.
Donovan stated that someone neededtoemphasizeto the Chicago attorneys t hat
theboard was getting serious.Patten asked if theboard would like him to
publish on August9 for the 25th.Piper asked the members how many of them
would like toseea work session on the 25th.This was discussed and Patten
emphasized that a work session couldbeheld on the25thaslongasthe
applicant submitted everyth ing neededt wo weeks before that date.Piper said
that if there was a work session on the 25th,he wou ld like to know that they
would move forward from that point.Patten explained that if there was a work
session on 8/25,acomplete submittal mustbeinby 9/2,whichmeant that
rea l istically t here may beanOctober date for thezoni ng,because the
submittal would havetogo through many Town agencies.
Donovan moved and Hobbs secondedtohavea work session on 8/25andtohavethe
process move forwardas quickly as possible.Thevote was 6-0 .
The board was told that there were no items scheduled for theAugust 11
meeting,but that the re was a possibility that there would bea joint meeting
withtheCouncil on that date .
The boardhadlooked at some projects in West Vail before the meeting,andthe
County Planning office hadaskedthe Va il Planning Commission to comment on the
projects .
1:First Bank ofVail drive-th rough ATM.
This was tobenext tothe 7-11 building in Chamonix Corners.Jay Peterson was
represe nting the applicant,and said that hehadconce rns aboutthe slope in
the winter timeand wouldwithdraw this from the County agenda if theboardhad
concer ns as well.Pam Hop kins felt th at there wouldbeaproblem if the re we re
more than two cars inthe drive lane waiting touse the machine .Sid Schultz
-4-
3.A request for rear and side setback variances anda site coverage
variance in order toadd two additions toan existing residence at lot
1,Block1,Vail Village 8th Filing.
App licant :JohnS.Tuschman
Kristan Pritz explained the backgroundof the request which included a setback
variance of10 feet for thewestand north property lines inJuneof1976.She
pointed out that in 1976 the staff recommended approval,asthe proposal would
notimpactany adjacent structures,and would also respect view corridors.It
was also felt at that time that the locat ion ofs urrounding residences andthe
small lot site created as ituation that warranted the variances.
In May,1983 the PEC reviewedasecond request for a5 foot side setback
encroachmentin order to build a bedroom addition on the east side ofthe
existing residence.The staff felt that there were other locations that would
allow for the construct ion ofthe bedroom within,or at least closer to,the
requi red setbacks and recommended denial.A non-building easementagreement
betweenthe ow ners ofLots1and 2hadbeen arranged in November of1980.The
Planning Commission members felt that this nonbuildable area described in the
easement provided adequate separation and low impactbetween properties and
approved the request 5-0 despite the staff's recommendation.
The s taff felt that thepresent request would have no impact on adjacent
structures ,the lot i ssmalland built to respect view corridors and
recommended approvalofthe request.Pritz added that the staff hadreviewed
similar requests andfound that the variances were reasonable.She stated that
the it was the staff's opinion that aslongasthe original rationale for
granting the setbac k var iances is reasonable and st ill pertains to the proposal
be ingr eviewed,it was notagrant of special pri vilege to continue the setbac k
encroac hments ,and was a f air i nterpretati on .The var iances a re merely
e xte nsions of previous var iances .To requi re that the additions joginand
out in order tomeet the existing setback requirements was unreasonable.The
site coverage variance doesnot greatly increase the bulkor character of the
building nor negatively impact adjacent properties
John Ra ilton,arch itect for the appl icants,answered questions .Donovan as ked
what rationale couldbeusedtogra nt additional si te coverage.Kristan
answered that it wasthes ize of the lot and that the addedbulkdidnot create
problems.Railton added that without the variances ,thehouse would be forced
tobe constructed with3 stories.
Piper stated that aslongas GRFA beyond that allowed was notbeing requested,
andaslongas the height wasnotbeing added to,he wasin favor of the
request.
Pritz stated that if the addition were built,the staff would like to make
certain the tree bythe living room was replanted or replaced.
SidSchu ltz moved andPam Hop kins seco nded toapprovet he request.The v ote
was 6-0i nf avor.
4.A request to amend thetime table for Spraddle Creek Subdivision.
Pete r Patten stated that Jay Peterso n,attorney fo r the appl icant,r equestedto
-3-
felt that in this location,a machine that was accessed by foot would be
better.Donovan felt a traffic hazard would be created becauseofthe
crisscross of the traffic.Piper felt he would rather seea pedestrian
machine,if the4 parking spots alongthe side couldbe marked for short term.
Hobbs agreedasdid Osterfoss.
2.The Valley Phase III.
This project consisted of10 single family lots,1600 sq ft eachwith5
foot setbacks.
Kristan Pritz stated that the staff didnothave adequate information for a
final review.Duane asked if the PUD mighthavebeen considered the
preliminary plan,and Pritz answered that it may havebeen.Donovan was
concernedabout accessing the road from the lots.She asked if 1600 sq foot
lots fit the PUD.
After more discussion,it seemed the concerns were:
1.Single Family lots inconsistent withthe rest ofthe PUD.
2.If single family lots will be accepted,they should conform toCounty
regs for single family lots,if notto Town regulations.
3.Information for the proposal is inadequate.Town needs preliminary plan
information suchas contours,utilities,fire access,drainage,and
staked lots.
4.How does east endofroad connect to main road?
5.Five foot setback doesnot provide enough buffer.
6.Tract 3shouldbebroken down to indicate what portion of this tract is
devotedto open spaceandwhat portion is devotedtotheroad.
7.Lot7has incorrect total acreage.
8.Need to decide who is responsible for completingand maintaining the
road.
9.Road doesnotconformto existing contours.
-5-
OTTO,PETERSON &POST
r R E DE RICK s .OT TO
J AY K.P E:TERS ON
W IL.L I AM J .PO ST
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PO ST O F FI CE BO X 3 149
VAIL ,COLORADO OJ6:58-3149
VA l l N ATIONAL BANK BUIL DING
(3031 475-0092
EAGLE VA I L PR OF ESS IONAL B UIL DING
f 303J 949-5380
July 30 ,1986
D ENVE R D IREC T LI N E
(303}623 -5926
Mr .Pete r Patton
Town of Vail
P .O.Box7
Vail ,CO 81 658
Dear Peter :
I am enc losing herewith ac opy of a letter which Is ent t o the
Eagle County Community Development Department rega rd ing our
Special Use Applicati on .
At this po int in t ime we have de c ided to withdraw the application
in order to ex plore all ou r a l ternatives for access to t he AT M
machine for the First Industrial Bank located in West Vail .I
wish t o thank you for your ti me in reviewing this matter with us .
"rI'(I
Peterson
Enclosure
"e
OTTO,PETERSON &POST
FRED E R IC K S .OT 'O
j AVK.P ST E:RSON
WI L L IAM J .P OST
July 30,19 86
ATTO :e..~EY S AT LAW
POS T O FF ICE:B OX31 49
VAIL,COLORADO 81638-3149
VAll NATIONAL B ANK B UILDING
(3 03)476-00 92
E:AGLE V AIL PROFESSIONAL BUILDI NG
(3 0319 49 -5380
DEN VER DIRECT LI NE
(303)623-5926
Mr.Mike Mollica
Department of Com~unity Development
P.O.Box 170
Ec;.gle,CO 81631
RE:ZS-242-86
Dear r·!ike:
The Firstbank of Vail has dec idee at this point to withdraw its
application fer a Special Use Permit for a drive-in facility for
t he the First In6ustrial Bank located in West Vail.
If you have any ~uestions Flease cODtact me at my office.
Sincerely,
\I I
Peterson
cc:Peter Patton
,"t'.~I
/
------------._--_...--.._--------1 ------.------------------..--------
-'-:-~--~~'\-----------._--
Ord i rl<:Jr:c c I lo ,e (.~,cr'i o s 0 f I ~'I .3 )
M 'r'l '("j'l '-1 .,(.j ·H!I Of,V,~ri I I\Ne r:
!\'ld /flr
C OIW;II (jj'J !Il.W /.1"-r','!I T
.J .L 'I "
•I
75 south fronl age road
va il,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000 o ffice of community development
Novemb er14,1985
KVMT
%Jamie Has tings
2271 Nort h Frontage Roa d
Vail,Co lora do 81 657
Re:KVM TAntenna l oca ted ont he Vail Run Building
Dea r Jam ie:
Rece ntlyIgave youa call c oncerning the KV MT a ntenna that is s till located
on t he Vail Run Bu ilding.Th e Comm unity De velopment De part ment has re ceived
severa l comp la int sf romnea rbyr esi de nts concerningt he antenn a.I am asking
you t o wor k wit h t he gener al manage rofthe Va il Ru n Resor t,Wi lliam Fle isher,
t o r emov et hisantenna byDecemver 14,1985.
InJ une of 1983,KVMT pres e ntedaproposal tot he Pl anninga ndEnvironmental
Comm iss ionto mo ve t heirof fices to Cha mon ix Co rne rs.Th e Pl anning Co mmission
approved th is reques t.A condition of ap pro val wa st hat KVM T re mo ve the
ante nna by J anua ry1,1984.This requiremen t wa s not me t.In Ap rilof1984
I se nta le tter t oStuSachs,general ma nager of KV MT,a nd ask ed th athe
r emove the a nten nabyJune 1,1984.This deadline wa s also not met.The
i ssue of removin g the an tennabecame very complicated,ast here were questions
asto wh o wa s act ually t he ow nerofth e an te nna and wh owasresp onsible for
re mov in gt he ant enna.,
Th e Communi ty Developme nt De partme nts ta ff is not goi ng tot ry todeci pher
t he l e galr esponsibil itiesbetween theVail Run Resortand KVMT.Regardless
of wh et her o r not t he ow nerof th e antenna is KVM T or Vail Run 'Re sort,the
staff i s re q ui ringt hat t he ant enna be r emove dby Dece mbe r14,1985.We
are as king t hat both KV MTa nd Vail Run Resort coopera tetor esolve t his
iss ue.
75 south fron t age road
vail ,co lorado 81657
(303)4 76-7000
April30 ,1984
StuSack s
Program Director
KvrH Radio
2271 NorthFro ntage Ro ad West
Vai l,Co lorado 81657
officeofcom munityde velopment
Re:aAntennaeon
r-Va il Ru n ~ildi ng
Dear Stu:~
Ihave enclose d acopyo f the minutes of the June13 ,1983 Planning
andEnvironmental Com~ission that concern ed KV MT's r equest for acon-
dit ional use permi t tobui ld anan tenna e on the t op of the ~namon ix
Co rners building.The Plann ing Depa rtment reques ts th at youcomply
with the approval byre moving t heol d an tennae from the Va i1 Run buil ding
and by pain ting y our new a ntennae at Cha monix Corners with a dull
paint.This work mus tbe compl eted by Jun e1 ,1984.Orig inall y,
KVMT wa s asked tor emove t heVail Run antenna eby J anuary 1,1 984.
If youhavea nyf urther questions,plea segive me a call.Than ks fo r
y our cooperation .
Sincerely,
V·\0 '\\\\\)\a.\\'ft?t:
KR ISTAN PR ITZ
Town Planner
KP :br
En cl.
75 south frontage ro ad
vail .colorado 81657
(303)476·7000
Ju ne13,1984
Dave Nowlin
Western Federal
P.O.Bo x 5807
Den ver,Colorado 80217
Dear Dave,
offIceof community development
Re:KVMT Cha moni x Corners and Va il Run
Here is the staff memo and Planning Co mmission mi nutes for the
KV MT pro po sa l.I ho pe t his information willbe he lfu l for you r
meeti ng on Fri day.
Please call me if you have further questions.
Si ncerely ,
1)Ti~~ffl Ott
KRISTAN PRITZ
Town Planner
KP:br
Encl.
ME MORA NDur 1
TO :Planning and Envi ronmental Comm ission
FROM:Department of Co mmunity Develo pme nt
DATE:June6,1983
---
RE:Re quest for a Conditional UsePe rm it inthe Comm ercial Core III
Zone District in Orderto Construct aStudioTransmiss ion Linka t
the KVMT StudioLocatedint he Chamoni x CornersBuil ding,apart
of Tract C,Vaildas Scho ne Filing #1 Applicant :R &L Commun ica tions
DESC RIP TIONOF PROPOS ED USE
R &L Co mmuni cat ions is currently constr uctinganew studio for KVMT wit hin
t he Cha monix Corners Buil dingin We st Vai l.The Co mm ercia l Core II I Zo ne
Distr ict a llowsrad ioand televis ion s ignalr elayt ransmi ssi on faci lities
asa cond it ional usev iaa recent amend ment.The operation and broadcast ing
of th e ra dios tation f rom th isloc at ion neces sitatestheneedf or trans mission
ofth e si gn alf rom the studio tot het ransla tor a t Potato Pa tch.
Th e STL (Studio Transmitter Link)isproposedtobethe following:
"Sp ecific Loc a tion of Site (Appendi x A)(On roof ofbui lding)
.70 'from th e east s ideof t hebu ilding and6 I f rom the front of the build i ng .
pesc ription of Ant enna
8foo tmetal po le suppo rted by tripod device.
Atthetopofthepol e will be aparabolicallys haped tubular struc ture
18 "h igh and46 'across."Corner Re fle ctor"(Appendi xB)
Ap proximately 12"belowthecor ner refl ector will be a Vagi Antenna;
an open television ty pe antenna 27 "longand 13"deep (Appen dix C).
The compl ete STL i stheminimu m hei gh tnecessaryto e ffect good tra nsmission
fr om ou r studio to our t ranslator at Pot ato Patch a nd isa lo w pow ered
devic es peci fic ally appro vedby th e Fe deral Comnunicat ions Cowmi ssion for
t rans mi ssion wiohin Radio Bandsexclusively a llocatedbyt he FCC fo ruse
by broadcast ers."
CRIT ERIA AND FIND I NG S
Upon reviewof Secti on 18.600,the Departmentof Com munity Development r ecommends
approvalofthe conditi onal usepermit based upon t hef ollowing factors :
Con sideration ofFact ors:
Re 1ati on sh i ~d impa ct oftheus e -on development obje ~t iyes oft he T OI~n .
Wh ile th e Tow n do esnotencourageroof top ant enn ae orabov e ground uti liti es,
i t is importa ntt o real ize tha taqual ity r adi o si gna li s inthepubli c interest .
KVMT R~-2-6/6/83
The effect of t~~~?e on li ght and air •.distributio~~_op~lation,tran s p~rtation
facilities,utilit~~s.schools2-P_~~~s_o ~d re crea ti on f oc i li ~ies,and other
public fac ili ti es and public facilitie sneeds.
No imp act.
Eff ect upon traffic withoa rticular referen ceto co~estion .autom otive and
pedestrian sa f ety and convenience,tra ffic flowa nd con tro l.acc e s s,man euve ra-
bility,a nd r em ovalof snow fro m the street and par kinga reas .
No impa ct .
Effect up on the character ofth e areain whi ch theproposedusei s tobe lo c ~t e d ,
including the scale andbulkoftheproposed use in relat iontosur ro un ding use~
The ante nnaeequ ipm ent wi ll not .intrude into any significant views,public
or private,andthe scale oftheequi pment i s relatively mino r in compa ri son
t os urroundinguses a nd structures.
Suc hother fa ctors and cr iter ia a s the commissi on deems applicable tot he
pro po sed use.
The environme ntal i mp act re port concernin g t he pro poseduse,i fan environmental
impact repor t is reguired by Chapter18 .56.
None re qui red.
FINDINGS
The De partment of Co mmunity Develop ment re commends that the cond itional use
permitbeapprovedbasedonthefollowi ng findings:
Thattheproposed location of t heuse is inaccordwithth e pu rpose s of thi s
ordinanceandthepurposesofthe district in which the site isl ocated .
Thattheproposed location of theuseandth e conditio ns und er wh ich it would
be op erated or maintained would notbedetri me nt al tothe public health,sa f ety ,
or we lf'areormat e ri ally inj uri ous toproperties o r i mp r ov ements i n t he vicinity .
Thatthepro posed use would comply with e achofthe applica ble pr ovisions
of this ordinanc e .
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS :
The Department ofCom munity Develo pment staff recom mends approval ofthe request ed
conditionaluse permit for the stated r easons.
C ORPORATION
POST OF F ICE BOX ~550
MEDFORD,OREGON 97501
(50 3)77 96SOO
r-------------------,---------=---.-----------_
APPLIC ATIONS:
o AURALBROADCASTSTL
o TELEMETRY
o POINT-TO -POINT
CO MMU NICATIONS
.......
ELECTRICAL SPEC IFICATIONS
Frequ ency Range:
Imp edance:
Gain (overd ipo le):
Maximum VSWR:
Fro nt-to-B ack Ra tio:
Polari zation:
Termination:
940to 96 0 MHz (Broadband)
50 ohms
14 db
1.3:1
23 db
V
Type N Female (males with UG-21 /U)
MECH ANICAL SPEC IFICATIONS
Net Dimens ions:
Net We ight:
Shi pping D imens ions:
Sh ipp ing Wei ght
\'J ind Load:
16"x 18"x 46%"-
12 po unds
16V2"x 18'12"x 47"(App rox .8 .3 cu .ft.)
•16 pou nds
137 p ounds (100MPH with V."r adial Ice)
M l r~I F :ECTOR'M,S t,R:GISTE f1 ED TRADE~I A f1K
o r SC ALA ELEC TflONIC C ORI'O ".ATlON
1~.00
',-/
('()f1 Lr.EL ECTROIl/C".',,.\".V~.1 ,-l ,-1 COR PORATION
POST OFFICE OS":~5 3 0
MEDFORD.OREG ON9750 1
(503)77%5CO
CA5·450
Frequency Range:
Impedance:
Gain(overd ipole):
VSWR:.
Front-to-back Ratio:
Input Power Rating:
Polari zation:
Termination:
N et Dim ensions:
NetWei ght:
ShippingWeig ht :
Wi ndLoad:
Mount ing:
ELE CTRICAL S PEC IFICATIO NS
Any specified freque ncy 216to1000MH z
50 ohms
10 db
1.3:1 maxi mum a tFc :!:0.6%
1.5:1 ma ximuma t Fc :!:1.0%
18db
100 watt s
HorV (rear-mount,adju stable)
Type N femal e (mat esw ithUG-21/U)
MECHA NICAL S PECIFICATIONS
(CA5-450 a t 46 0 MHz)
27"X 13"X :5"
4 pound s
7 pounds
25 po unds (100 M PHw ith1/4"ice)
Att aches to circular suppo rl wit hma ximum
2·3m"0 .0.
11 8\.1
Corcoranaskedthenei ghb ors inth eaudience if they would beinfavorof
the TO V t rading part of lot 40 fo rl ot 34 i nor der to pla ce th eday care
center on part of lot 40.The response from all was that they were not~
Mo re dis cussi on fo llowedconcer ningt he exchange of propertie s,un d then ~;rk i n s
r eguested t ot able t here guest unti l J uly 11 .Viele moved andDonovan s econded
to table t her eque st until July 11.Thevote was 3-0withCorcoran absta i ning.
_oPEC 6/13/83-5-
5 .
3.Request for a co n-d i t i-;;;~i--~-~e-~it in order tobuil d an antennaeonthe
top oftheChamo nix Corners bu i1dng,part of Tract C,Va ildas Schone Fi ling
~.App 11~n t :R and-l-LD mmaRft a ti ons ,I nc.(KVMT -FM)
Peter Jamare xplained that anante nnae woul dbe placed on the Chamoni x Co rners
Buildi ng i n Wes t Vai l to s ervice t he new s tudiof or KV MT.Bob Dorfof KV MT answe red
questions.Trout sugg ested theantennaebe painted,and Donovan suggest ed t hat
the paint befl at in a li ght color.and that the faciliti es be removed from the
to p of t heVail Run bUilding..
Donovan mov ed andTrout s econdedto approvethe request perthes taff memo dated
June6,1983wit hth e condi tions that th e equ ipment p_er taini na to KVMT be re mo ved
fro m the t oo of t he Vai l Run Building by J anua ry 1,1 984 ,andtha tt he ant e nnae
to be constr ucte dont he Cham oni x Corners building be painted witha dull pa i nt.
The vote wa s 4-0i n fav or.
The Planning and Environmental Comm ission tookabrea k to eat l unch.
4.Reques t for aname ndment to Secti ons ·18 .04 .030,18.22.090 and 18 .24.1 30
inor der to i ncreaset he number of accomnodation units allow edinthe
Com merc ial CoreI a nd th e Publi c Accom mo dation zo ned istri ct s .Applica nt:
Lodge Properties,Inc .
Corcorans t ate d that he hada le tter f r om the applicant witha request to ta ble
this item until th e nextmee ti ng.Trout moved and Vieles econded to table ,and
thevote was 4-0in favor of tabl ing.
Req uest for a vari ancef r om Se ct ion 18.13.080 (A L which re strict s on e un it
inaPrimary/Secon dar y zoneto 40 %ofthe al~bl e GRFA on lot 11,SlockE
Vaildas Schone Fil ing #1.Applicants:I.M.and T.K.Tur nb ull
Ji m Sayree xpla ined t here questa nd Sus anVa ug hn,representi ng t he Turn bu l1s,
stated th at t he 60/40 rule was topr event 'mirror ima ges,butt hat theaddi ti ons
wouldhelpreduce the present mirror a ppearance of th e du plex becauseth e add it io ns
woul dhavet o bepl acedd iff erently.Theduplex coul dr emai n 50/50 and s ti ll c hange
fr om oneo f mir r or i ma ge.'
'.e
75 south frontage road
vall .colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
June13,1984
Dave Nowlin
Western Federal
P.O.Box 5807
Denver,Colorado 80217
Dear Dave,
officeof community development
Re:KVMT Chamonix Corners and Vail Run
Here is the staff memo and Planning Commission minutesforthe
KVMT proposal.I hope this informationwillbe helful for your
meeting on Friday.
Please call me if you have further questions .
Sincerely,
~i An-h-f(Itr
KRISTAN PRITZ
Town Planner
KP:br
Encl.
75 south front age roa d
vai l,colorado 8165 7
(303)476-7000
April 30,1984
Stu Sacks
Program Director
KVMTRadio
2271 North Front age Road We st
Vail,Colorado 81657
office ofcom munity developmen t
Re:aAntennae on
;--Va i l Run B~ld ing
De ar Stu :~
I havee nc los eda copyof t he mi nu tesoft he Ju ne 13,1983Planning
and En vironmen tal Co mmission that concer ned KVMT's re quest for a con-
di tional use permitto build ana ntennae on the topof the Ch amon ix
Corners buildi ng .The Pl anning Department r equests that youcomp ly
wit h thea pproval by remo ving the old a ntennae f rom the Vail Run buildi ng
and by paint ing you r new a ntenna e at Ch amonix Corners with a dull
paint .This work mustbe compl eted byJune 1 ,1984.Originally,
KVM T was as kedtor emove the Va il Run ant ennae byJan uary 1,1984.
If youhaveany furt her questions,please give meaca ll .Th anks for
yourcooperation .
Sinc erely,
~\\~Q~~~
KRIS TAN PRITZ
Town Pl anner
KP :br
Encl.
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
Le e Bennett
p,O.Bo x 2451
Vail,Colorado,81658
Dear Lee,
officeofcommunitydevelopment
October15,1984
Ihave recetved theproposed berm for Chamoni x Chalets andhave
given tt a staff approvalwith the following conditions:
1 .Berm notimpact the existing d itch alongtheNorth
Frontage Road .
2.Re-vegetation becompleted by November l ~1984.
3.Addition landscape plan for the site be submitted by May 1,1985.
please feel f ree to call me withany questions you ma y have.
Si nc erely,
/",''1
/.
(\'.';.'.\)_lt l<.~\..
Thomas A.Braun
Town Plann
TAB/rme
7 I
..
;••ProjectApplication ,
J .
Date (/7
'/t~//1 ;.'J A It -
Project Name :
I j...I b t ,1/Pro ject Desc ription :/II
Ii:-E 1 l /'l/v I-.-""1'
Contact Person andPhone I
jf .L I /7rt'j!I/,A I
Owner.Address and Phone:__--:.....1....---.:..::.=--_
t{
;,L L /I/C/JA-[
c c f2JJ1 /17
7{[IlL'/1
II l
')1 I
I,
II
IDate _
Mo tion by :_
Second ed by :_
APPROVA L DISAPPROVAL
J
JSummary:------t.-=f-'.;.=---"----'---------:--'------------------------
T own Planner
....
o St aff Approval
D ate :_
~§::;;"'~.~._.._---"~..:..~-::::::E :~~:G"
----~-~-
CHAMONIX CHALET CORP.
P.O.Box 1367 •Vail,C olorado81657
June 1,1984
Town of Vai I
Vail,CO 81658
Dear Sirs:
The Board of Directors of Chamonix Chalet Corp.has given
their secretary,Lee Bennett,the authority to construct a
landscaping burm at the bottom of Chamonix Drive in anow
vacant lot.
This area is the main entrance to the Chamonix complex and
visible from 1-70 as well as the north frontage road.It
has been a vacant lot that has been subject to abuse and
I ittering.If a burm is created on which we can plant
flowering bushes and native flowers,we will create a
pleasant entrance to our complex and a positive asset to the
area.
The initial money allocated will be $150.00.
Sincerely,
Directors
Cha let Cor p•
•
\.
..
\
\
\
\
\,
•LIST OF MAT ERIA LS•(&~i\~~--7:u.n r\~bf1-
NA ME OF PROJECT :~\~~f~~~LEGAL DESC RIPTI ON:-'L;vOT~--=--_--=--_-_-_-_-----nBTCLO"'C"'K~-_-...:..-_-_-_-_r-_-_"F'TI"LI"N;;<"G-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_'\.'I \
STREE T ADDRESS:•(MCYl ,S()(•
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT :,~•.
The following informat ion is r equiredfor subm ittal by the applicant to th e Design Review
Board beforea final app roval canbefiven :
COLOR
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Flas hi ngs ..
Flues
Wind ow s
Door Trim
Window Trim
Fascia
Hand or Dec k Rails
Doors
7
Chimneys ~
Trash Enc1osure /-------------------''---------
Greenhouse s/'
Other/
(
Soffi ts
Siding
Other Wa11
A.BUI LDI NG MA TERIA LS:TYPE OF MATERIA L
r-,
Roo
B.LA NDSCAPI NG:Name ofDesigner:
pho ne:
PLA NT MATER IAL S:Botantca1
PROPOSED TREES Il!LJ,
EXISTING TR EES TO Il!(j
BE REMOVED I
*I ndicate calipe r for .deciduc·ious trees.Indicate height for conifers.••
•
PLA NT MATE RIAL S:Bo tanical N a m~
(can't)
SHRUBS
EXI STI NG SHRUBS
TO BE RE r~O VED
GROU ND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IR RIG ATI ON
Co mmon Nam e
•
Qua nity Size
Sq uare Footage
TYPE OR MET HOD OF _
EROSION CONTROL
•
C.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swimming pools,etc.)Please specify .
••
,•MEMO RA NDU/4 •.>TO:Planning and En vir onmental Conmission
FROM:Depa rtmentof Co mmun ity Development
DA TE:June6,1983
RE:Request for a Conditional UsePermitinthe Com me rci al Core III
Zone District i n Orderto Construct aStudioTransmission Link at
the KVMT St udio Located inth e Chamonix Corners Bu ildi ng,a part
of Tract C,Vaildas Schone Filing #1 App licant:R &L Communications
DE SCR I PT ION OF PR OPOSED USE
R &L Co mmunications is currently constructing a new studio for KVMT within
the Cha monix Corners Bu ild ing in We st Vail.Th e Co mmercial Co re III Zone
District all ows radio andt elevisionsi gnal rel ay transmission facilities
asa con d itional use viaare cent amendmen t.The operation a nd broadcasti ng
of the radio s tat ion fro m th isl oca t ion neces si tates t he need f or tra nsmission
of thes ignal fr omth e stu diotot he tra nslator a t PotatoPatch.
The STL (Studio Transmitter Link)is proposedtobethe following:
"Specific Loc ati onof Site (Appendi xA)(On roof of building)
.70'fr om the east side ofthe bU ilding and 6 I from th e front of the bUi ldi ng.
pescription of Antenna
8 foot metalpolesupported by tri pod device.
Atth et opofthepol ewillbea .parabolical lyshaped iubul ar structure
18"h i gh and 46'across."Corner Reflector"(Ap pendixB)
Appro xi ma t ely12"bel 0\'1 thecorn er refl ector wi 11 beaVag i Antenna ;
anopen televisio nty peantenna27"lo ng a nd 13"deep (Appe nd ix C).
The complete STL i sthe mi n imum heigh t necessaryto effect good tra nsmission
fro m our s tudiot o our transl ator at Potato Patc ha ndi sa lo w powered
device specifically approvedby t he FederalComm un ic at ions Commission for
trans mission wioh inRadio Bands ex clusively allocated by the FCC for use
by broadcasters."
CRIT ERIA AND FIND I NG S
Upon revi ew of Sectio n 18.600,the Departmentof Co mmu nity Development r ecom mends
approv aloft he cond itional useper mit based upon thef ollowing factors:
Consid erat io n of Factor s:
Rel ations hi ~d i mpactof theus e on develo pm ent object i v~s ofthe To wn.
Whileth eTow n do esnotencourager oo ft op ant enn ae or abov e ground utilit ies,
it is i mpor tant t o real i zet hata qual ity r adio si gnal i sinthe publ icin terest.
.....KVMT RELAY -2-6/6/83•
The effec t oftheuse on l ightand air,distri but io~op~l ati o n ,tra nsportation
fa.cilities ,utiliti es ,s chooE...L.2_;:!.r.t~s_~_n d re cr eat ion f acil it i es,and other
publicfac ili ti es and pub li c fa cilitiesneeds..
No impact.
Effect upon traffic with parti cular r eference to congestion,automotive and
p ~destrian safe t~and conve ni e nce,t raffic flowandcontrol.a cces s,maneuver a-
blli ty,and re movalof snow from the streetandpar kinga reas.
No i mp act.
Eff ect upon t he chara cter oft hear ea inwhichthe proposeduse istobel ocated,
includi ng the sc ale andbulkof the pro posedusei n r el at ionto s urroundinguses .
The antennaeequi pm ent will no t int rude into any si gn if icantvi ews,public
or private ,a nd t he scale oftheequipment is relative ly mi nor in comp arison
tosurroun ding uses and structures.
Such other factors and c riteria asthe commissiondeems applicaoletothe
prop'osed use.
The env ironmenta l impa ct r eportconcerning thepro posed use,i fanenvi ronme ntal
i mpact r e po rt i sre q uiredby Ch apter 18 .56.
None requ ired.
FI NDI NGS
The Department ofCommunity Develop ment re commendstha t th e conditional use
permitbeapproved basedonthe followi ng findi ngs:
Thatth e proposed location ofthe usei s inaccord with thepurposesofth is
ordinance andthe purposesof th e di stric t inwhich th e siteis located.
Tha t t heproposed l ocat ion oft heuse andt he condit ionsunderwhichi t wo uld
be operated ormaintained woul d no t bede tr im entalt othepubli chealth,safety ,
orwe l f'a reorma ter ia lly i njur-i ou s t o proper tiesor improvements i n th e vi cinity .
Th at t he pro po sed use wou ld comply wit hea choftheapplic able prov isions
ofth is ordin ance.
STAFF RECOMME NDATIO NS:
The Depart ment ofCommunit yDevel opme nt sta ff recom mendsapprovalofther equ e sted
conditi on aluse permitfo r th es ta ted re as ons.
POST OF FICEBOX 4580
ME DFORD,OR EGON 97501
(503)779 ·5500
..
-.,
•r~·LA ElECTRONI
C OR P O ilAT ION
·ce
~/:,/]/'~EI/r>/(,~I'L~]II
r\II F..CGO
MI NIF LL:CTOR™
.---.
APPLICATIONS:
o AURALBROADCASTSTL
o TELEMETRY
POI NT-TO-POINT
COMMUNICATIONS
Frequency Range:
Impedance:
Gain(over dipole):
Max imum VSWR:
Front-to-Back Ratio:
Polarization:
Termination:
Net Dimens ions :
Net Weight:
Sh ipping Dimensions:
Sh ippingW eight
Wind Load:
ELECTRICAL S P ECIFICATIONS
940to960MHz (Broadband)
50 ohms
14 db
1.3:1
23db
V
TypeN Female (mates with UG·21/U)
MECH A NICAL S P ECIFIC ATIONS
16"x 18 "x 46Vz"
12 pounds
16Vz"x 18'12"x 47"(Appro x.8.3 cu.ft.)•16 pou nds
137pou nds (100MPH with '/~"rad ial Ice)
M IN I Fl ECT OR T"I S A RfG ISTERED TRADEMAR K
O F SC ALA ELECH10NIC COilPO'l ATI O N
POSTOFFI CE £lOX 4580
MED FORD.OR EGON 9 750 1
(503)779 ·6500
>!
2CA5·450V
ELEC m onic
CORPORATION
CA5·450
·,
',--"
Frequency Range:
Impedance:
Gain (over dipole):
VSWR:
Front -to -back Rat io:
Input Power Rating:
Polar iza tio n :
Termination:
ELECTRICAL S PEC IFICATIO NS
Any specif ied f requency 216 to1000 MHz
50 ohms
10 db
1.3:1 maximum atFc =0 .6%
1.5:1 maximum atFc =1.0 %
18 db
100 wa tts
Ho r V (rear-mou nt ,adjustabl e)
Typ e Nfem ale (m ates wit hUG·21/U)
,.
i
I
N et Dimens ions:
Net W eight:
Sh ippi ngW ei ght:
W indLoad:
Mou ntin g:
MECHA NICAL S PECIFICATIONS
(CA5-450 at 460 MHz)
27"X 13"X ~"
4po unds
7 pou nds
25pou nds(100MPH wit h1/4"ice)
Att a ches to circularsup por t w ithma ximu m
2 -318 "0 .0.
1/·BU
•Planning and Environ mental Commission
June13,1983
MEMBERS PRESENT
Dan Corcoran
Diana Donovan
Will Trout
JimViele
ABSENT
Jim Morgan
Gordon Pierce
Duane Piper
STAFF PRESENT
Dick Ryan
Peter Pa t ten
Peter Jamar
JimSayre
Betsy Rosolack
COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE
Chuck Anderson
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 am by Dan Corcoran,chairman.The
first item on the agend a was theapprovaloftheminutesofthe me eting of
May 23,1983,Corcorancorr ected item #1toread "The vo te was 5in favor"i nstead
of4.Donovan moved and Trout seconded toapprovetheminutesas corrected.The
vote was 4-0 in favor.The applicant for #4,Lod ge at Vail,requested to table until
June27.Trout moved and Vie le seconded to table.The vote wa s 4-0 to tabl e.
1 ,~re uesttor ezone Tre etQ.2 s Condo min iums fr om the Hi gh Density Multipl e Family
HDM F)zone dis.trin -to Comm ercial Core II zope district and a request for
an exemption toallow a l oading s pace witl1Ti1 the reqUired front setback.
Applicant:Treeto ps Cond om inium Association.
Peter Jamar explained the mem o and reminded theboard that theoriginal memo of
Apri l 13,1983 containedthe request,and that the PEC had tabled the request in
order for th e applicant t o in vestigate traffic and c irc ulation i mpacts oft heproposal
on the already congested Ea st Lionshead Circle area.The PEC had also askedthe
applicant toTook at mov ing the loadin g zone out of the front setback andtolook
at the snow s torage pr oblem .Jamarshowed a site planhehad received just before
themeetingwhich thes taffhad not had timeto stu dy.The new plan showed a new
location for a loading s pacea nda snow storage area.Jamar re ad from t he traffic
stu dy which stated tha t t he im pacts oftheproposalcouldbe alleviated by four
listed items.He statedth at there would be no guarantee th at s ignsoragr eements
would stop th e useofsh ort term parking.He felt that apedes trian connecti on
between theproposed com mercial developm ent andthe Lion shead parking structu re
portal woul d alleviate some of the pedestr.ian travel throu gh the bus/truck a rea,
as woul dt he 1i miting o"fthe typesofusesallowedinthe propo sed building.
Jamar also explained th at t he -applicants suggest ed consolidating the east and westbound
bus platform,butth at t he Tr ansportation depart ment gaverea sons why this wo uld
not wo rk.He mentioned th efa ct that the traffic studyal so showed that 42 %of
the traffic inthe are a wa s from autos,and until there wa s a solution tothe private
auto entering the area (sucha sa Chec kpoint Char -l i e),no additional problemss hould
be created i ntheEastLions head Circle area,He also said that the staff could not
make a recom mendation of a pp roval without further studyofthe new plan .
Ted strauss,Pres ident -of t heTreetops Condominiu m Association,stated that a tthe
last meetin g,theywere t old t o go back and have a traffic study made,they se lected
a traffic engineer recom mended by Peter Jamar,and it was the engineer's -opinion that
the traffic pattern intheEast Lionshead area would notchange.
•PEC 6/13~-2 -
Da vid Lea hy ,t ra ffic engineerwith TDA s howeda ti me lapse mo vie ofthe area,
and pointed out t hree no des.one was the priva tevanswithper mits to stop ,
anoth er was the stopping ofthebuses ,andt he third was the traf fic from autos.
He add ed that i t was alu xury to allow priv ate automobiles to drive so close to
theski lift,and that this was notallow ed i nmosts ki areas.He felt that wit h
the site improve ments suggested by Treeto ps,the area would beopened up,thebuses
could all useone platform,th ere would be additional curbspace dedicated to transit
use only,andheadded that he saw this area asan extension of the mall,in which
casethe retail shopshere would not generate more trips.
Mike McGee of the Vail Fire Departmentspoke next,explaining that the Fire Department
was concernedabout access to fight fires at Treetops.He said that the fir emen
could drive a truc k onto thepresent top leve l of theparking structure,but if it
were coveredwith a building,t hey would havea difficu lt ti me becausethedriveway
to the west of the building wasnarrowwith either as harp turn ora steep dro p
which made it im possible topos it ion a ladder truck.SkipGordon,of the Tow n of Vai l
Transportation Depart ment stated that at present 5vans had permission todrop off
orpick up passengers,and that one ofthe stipulations was that each driver had
toremainin his van.Skip stated that between 2,000 and 3,000peoplewere pic ked
up or dropped-off at this point fronl 3:00to5:30 pm during the ski seasonwhich
required 3 supervisors from his department.His feeling was that if there were
more retail space at EastLionshead Circle there would be more private autQs driving
in the area,and that evenwith3 supervisors it was impossible tokeepthe private
autos out of the area.
CurtUfkes,Assistant Police Chief,elaborated on Skip's comments and added that
this was oneofthe worst areas inthe Town with respect to pedestrians and vehicles.
Ufkes felt that there definite ly neededtobea Check point Cha rlie at the topof
the street.He stated that the Police Depa rtment was in favor ofthe new retail
space if a Chec kpoint Charlie were first i nstalled.He added that they hadn't found
that peoplewere using the LionsheadParking Structure,and that if evenone car
parked .in -Lionshead Circle,it could tie up traffic,and that the loading zone for
trucks was overtaxed.Ufkes said that in addition to t he3 ,supervisors,there were 2
traffic controllers usedin the area at the peak times,andsometi mes another uniformed
policeman,and still the peoplein autos wanted topar k right in front of the busiest
area.He didmention that off-street parking would be a solution for unloading and
loading.
Pete Burnett,Town ofVail street supervisor,was concerned about snow storage.
He felt that theplan presented would increase thesnow tobe cleared away,and
reducethe area in which to store snow.He added tha ti t was i mp ossibleto be able
to state a certain time when hecould remove the snow,and that theroads werereduced
inwidthinthe winter because of the snow.
Viele asked if the snow was currently stored on public property,and Peter Jamar
said that it was.Donovan wantedto know if it were f easibleto cut aroadtothe
east ofthe parkin g structure,a ndaddedth at she fel t aneedto study thenew site
plan before making a decision ..She felt that a Check poin t Charlie was neededwhether
or not t he Treetops Condo minium proposal was accepted .Donovan ask ed if th e Treeto ps
had enough off-street parkin g,and J am arr esponded th at Treetops at present had 50
parkin g spaces,which was 2s paces s hort of what was presently r equired.Witht he
addition,27 additio nal spaceswere needed ,and these couldbepaid for in li eu of
the actual spaces.Donovan felt that letting people buyspaceinthe parki ng structure
•PEC 6/1 3/83 -3-•
was in reality letti ng t hem off the hook,and t hat when t he struct ure wa s full of
s kiers I th ere was no pla ce topark.She repe at ed that she felt mo restudy was need ed.
Trout said that Strauss had re f erred tothes paces as "office space",and questioned
that.Ja mar r ep1 iedth at offic es were not permit tedonthegrou nd floor in CCll
zone district.Strauss saidt hat they expected t hesp acet obe retail.Trout
stated that mostof the discussion was oft he problem i nthe area right now,and
suggestedlooking at the applicant's proposal which increased thecurbspace and
drop-off area.Hef elt th at th ey couldnotholdtheappl icant res ponsible for a
problem that already exists,a nd wo nd ered if the Town Council had r ev iewed or
recommended aCheckpoint Charli e.Jamar a nswe red that theCouncil had not budgeted
money for one.
Discussion followedconcerni ng fi re truc k acc ess tothe bu ilding,and Dick Dur an,
Fire Chief,repeat edMike McGee'sconcernsa bou t turni ng r adius;r oom to ma neuve rand
steep grades.Troutfe lt th at r estrict ed us es couldbe enforced un til Chec kpoint
Charlieis constructed,and i nthe mean ti me,he f eltthe i ssueof the fire truck
access shouldbe sol ved.
Dan Corcoran stated that theappl icant couldrequest tabling,couldappealtoCouncil
if tu rned dow n,o r could as k for avote.Stra uss s ta tedt hat hef elt the need to
proceed,a nd t hatTreeto ps di d no t ha ve the money to sta ll a Ch eckpoint Charlie .
Trout fel t hecouldnotvotein favor ofthe project with t he fire truck access
proble m and encouraged the applic ant tor equest to table .Strauss said he would
request to ta ble toa ddress th ef ire safety problem,butprotested t hat this mee ting
.wasto discuss traffic pr oblem only.
Strauss stated that he ~ro uld li ke only three items t o beaddressed at the po stponed
mee ti ng:Added f ire a cce s s,r etail spaceo nly,am dsnow s torage.Corcoran sta ted
that th emembe rswho were absent may have add it ionalconcerns as well.Jam ar r eminded
theboardth at thes taff also was concern ed a bout theloading area,s incethe y had
no thad timeto st udy th e new site plan.
Mar ka Moser,inthe audi e~ce ,r emi nded th e bo ardth at wh enthe parking structure
was first built,sev eral s pacesweresupposedt o beres erved for drop-off parking,
but that this had notmat erialized,and that if these spaces were reserved,part
ofth e problem mightbe resolved.-----
Strauss asked to table t he item until t he mee tingof July 25 .Trout movedtot able
unt il July 25,withViel e seconding.Th e vo te t o table was4-0inf avor.
2 .Conditional usere quest for apr iva te pre-schoolto be located on lot 34
in BuffehrCreek Su bd ivision onCham onix Lan e .Ap plicants:Mi ke and Debbie
Dawson •
Dic k Ryan pr esented th epr opo sal,ande xplained that,alth ou gh thef acil ity was
need ed,th e staff qu e st ioned th e traffic i mpacta ndth e la ck of adequ ate parkin g,
and fe lt these concer ns had not bee n ~dequ a t el y addressed.
John Perkins,architect f or the applicant,stated that theday care f acilitie s in
••PEC 6/1 3/83 -4-
theVaila rea had waiting li st s,representin g a real need .He e xpla i ned th e
floor and site plan sand st ated tha t th e building wasdes ignede specially for
that property.
Mike Dawson ,oneofthe applic ants,stated that th ey had been looking at pro perty
for 8-9 months,and found that commerc ial property was simplynotf easibl e
fin ancially.
Corcoran stated that the staff had received 8 letters of protest fr om neighbors,
and a petition ofprotest containing 60 na mes .
Dick Pete rson,a neighbor,was con cerned aboutthe traffic on whathe s aid were
verynar row streets.He added that t hebus was adet ri ment on suchnarrow streets,
and also that hedidnotfeeladay care shouldhavethe continueduse ofa
neighborhood park ,and that a day care facility would lower values ofproperty
in the area .
J im Ki ng,ano ther neighbor ,sai dt hathe was concern eda boutthe no ise because he
worked very l atea t night,and the early arrival of children would bo ther him.
He sta tedt hatth ere was not enough parking,an ds omeof theoverfl ow wou ld pr obably
end up inhi sdriveway.
Brian McCart ney,neighb or,was concer nedabout traffic fl ow,espec ial ly i n t he
winte r when Buffehr CreekRoad was slippery .
Marka Moser,neighbor,fe lt thelo cat ion wi thhigh traffic and stream s was not
a safe place for a school.
Phoebe Peterson agreedwiththe concernsoftheothe r s,asdid Dave Pe1ka m.
Will Trout said that if he lived onth e st reet,he wou ldbeconcerned abou t it,
a lso,for traffic do esn't j usthappen a tcer tain hou r s.Donovan felt the situation
was dangerous,though t heneedwasapparent .She suggested that th eappl icant
try toexchange theproperty f or part ofl ot 40 wh ichwastobecome a Town park.
Viele was concerned wi th the pr obl em s,particularly theparking .Ryan said th at
the ABC School had a bout 15-18 parkin gspa ces whic hwas not enou gh when sp ecial
events were held .Vi ele as ked if a site pl an had been don e for t he Town park,
and Ryan answered that one had no t been done ,bu t t hat th erewould beane ighborhoo d
meetingtosee wh at wa s wanted or need ed i n thepark.Ryan said t hat he had
discussed theexchange withthe Town ~a n age r ,buthad not a s yet r ecei ved an
answer.
John Perkins stated that he would l i ke to expl oreth e id ea ofalandexchange,
a ndwanted to know wh at thePEC felt about it.Di ckPete rsonre minded th e PEC
that when the TOV acquired th e park,i t wa s suggest ed no t to have parking there
so.that t ~e r e would not bea notherroad cut from t he fro ntageroad.BrianMcCartney
s a l ~hedidnotfee l .the TOV s houl d pro vide he lp topr ivate citizens for th e ir
buslnes ses,andPerk ln s'respond ed t ha t th e To wnhas a history ofhelpin g oth er
daycare centers .Headded tha tthea pplicant had not r eally as ked the Town of
Vail for anything,but t hesuggestion concerned anequal t radeof land.He s aid
that theschool locat ed onth e frontag e ro ad couldbea nois e buffer from 1-70.
•.EC 6/13/83 -5-
Corcoranas ked thene i ghbo rs inthe audience if theywould beinfavorof
the TOV trad ing part o f lot 40 for lot 34 in order to pla ce th eday care
center on part of lot 40.The response from all was that theywere not~
More discuss ion followedconcerningtheexchange of properti es.andthen Perk ins
fequested to table th erequest until J uly11.Viele moved and Donovan s econded
o table ther equest until July 11.The vote was 3-0withCorcoran abstain ing.
order to build a nantennae on the3.
(KVMT-FM)
Filing
Peter Jamar explained that an antennae would beplacedonthe Chamonix Corners
Building in West Vailto service th e new studio for KVMT.Bob Dorfof KVMT answered
questions.Trout suggested theantennaebe painted,and Donovan suggested that
the paint be flat ina light color.and that the facilities be removed fro m the
topof the Vail Run bUilding."
Donovan moved and Trout secondedto ap'prove the request per the staff memo dated
June6,1983 with the conditions tha t theequip ment pertainingto KVMT ber emo ved
from thetopof t he Va il Ru n Buildin g by January 1,1 984.a nd that thean tennae
tobe constructed onthe Chamoni x Corners building be painted witha dull paint.
The vote was 4-0 i n favor.
The Planning and Environmental Commission tookabreakto eat lunch.
4.Request for an amend ment to Sections '18.04 .030,18.22.090 and 18.24.130
in order to increase the number ofaccomnodation units allowedinth e
Commercial CoreIandthe Public Accommodation zone districts.Applicant:
Lodge Properties,Inc.
Corcoran stated that hehada letter from the applicant witha request to table
this item until thenext meeting.Trout moved andVielesecondedto table,and
thevote was 4-0in favor of tabling.
".
5.Request for a variance from Section 18.13.080 A which r estricts one unit
zoneto 40 %of the a1 owab eGRFA on ot 1,BlockE
#1.Appl icants:LM.andT.K.Turnbull
JimSayree xplained the request and Susan Vaughn,represent~ng the Turnbulls,
stated that th e 60 /40 rule was toprev errtm lrror images ,but t hattheadditi on s
would help r educeth e pres ent mirrorappearance ofthe dup le x becausethe add it ions
would haveto be placed d ifferently.Theduplex ~ould re main 50/50and still change
from oneof mirror image.'
•PEC
Re ver en dThomasKentTurnbull ,oneof theapplica nts,add ed th at t he garage
was i mportant aswell.Va ugh nadd ed t hatshe was aplanner wi th Eag le Coun ty,
and s he did a re vi ew ofthe numb erofhomes int he areat hat are zoned Pri ma r y/
Secondary but are actually 50-50,andth at t here were not ma ny.
Trout was symp athetictothe proposal,and was Donovan,butshef elt strongly
that duple x that existed beforebeingzoned 60/40 should rema in 50/50,but wanted
to find a way todo it without granting a variance.She f elt that thi s was
a question that needed tobe addressed .Viele felt that the additions to this
property did movetowardthe intent of erasing th emirror ima ge.
Trout moved a nd Do novan second edto appro ve t he re~e s tJlo~the__var iance for the
reas ons that t he granting of thevar iance would not consti tute
a grant of special privilege inconsi stent wi th th e li mitati ons on other pro pe rti es
classi fied in t he same distri c t,that the granti ng of th e var iance ouldnot
be detrim ental tothe pu blic health,sa fety,or welfare,or mat e rially injurio us
toproperti es ori mprove ments int he vicinity,a nd that thevariance was warranted
because t he st rictor l iteral interpreta tion ande nf orceme ntoft he specified
regula tion would result inpr actical difficu lty orunnecessaryphysi cal hardship
incons istent wit h the objecti ves of this tit le.
The vot e was 4-0 toapproveth e var iance.
6.Request f oraname nd mentto Section 18 .26.040 ofthe Vai l Muni cipal Cod e,
Cond itional Uses in CCI I,i n or dert oadd:.G.Co mm erc ial storag eas l Oi12-
it is basem ent lev el,not havi ng any exte ri or fro n tag~on any pu blic w ~
street,walkwa y ormall are a.App li cants:Br ad ley Qu ayle and Michael Arnett
Peter Patten e xplained th at this amen dment didnotconcern any s pecific property .
Mike Arnet t,oneofthe applicants,felt that there was a need f ort hisuse.
Patten remind ed theboard that each conditiona l use applicant wo uld first have
toabid e by two absolute s--th e basement level.and having no e xterior fronta ge
on any pu blic way,street,wa lkway or ma ll a rea.Donovanwas concerned abo ut
hav ing a de finition for "commer ci a l st orage ."Arne tt said that building and
fire codescontained defin i tions f orc ommercial s torage.
Corcoran fe lt th at concernscouldbe addressed on an individual basi s .
Vi ele move d andTroutsec o nd edto approve t hereque st.The vote wa s 4-0 inf avor.
7.Request f oi ame nd acond iti onal useperm it in or derto a l lowtheVailMounta in
Sch0 0-to USe th e B'!-l!aJ!.fCa bin a sa ~ne ra l purpose cl..as sroom and small
meetln g assemb lyr oom.APPl ica nt:Va ilMou ntain Schoo l
Peter J amar s t ated th at the a pplicant had met wi th Steve ·Pa tt erson,and that
t hey were actua ll ydoing more t han was necessary to br ingthebuil di ng up to
bui lding code.Rick Ba ldw in,represe nting t he.VailMou ntain Scho ol explain ed
that th ecabin woul d probably be usedf irst f or musiccl asse s.
Do nova n moved a nd Vi elese con ded to ~r ov e th er equest.The vot e was 4-0
i n favor .
•PE C'1 3/83 -7-
8 .~ues t to amendjQec ial Deve lopm ent Distrl ct No.6 ,the Va il Village Inn
complex ,to add outside vendingasa cond itional use.Applican t:Van Ewing
Dick Rya nexpl ained that i f t he ame ndme nt is approved by th ePlanningandEnviron-
mental Comm ission,andt hen by th e To wn Council ,the applicantwill have to
come backwith a r equest for aconditiona l useper mi t f or a spe ci fi cuse.Hp
added that t he staff f elt t hat a certai n amo untofvendingadded toth e s t r e et
l ifein Vail,and was in favor of it when it wasn't i n conflict withother uses.
Van Ewing said that hehad the support of t hesurroundingshops.Trout said he
had t hought t his was i llega l i nt he Town of Va i l.Di ckexplained that this would
be r eviewed on a c ase by c ase bas is.Di ana wanted to know what cont rols t he Town
had overtheother pop corn waqon s,a nd Ryan re plied tha tt heagreemen t \'Ii tht he
To wn in cludedcont rol o f trash ,ty peof menu s,etc .Don ovanf e lt tha ta popcorn
wago nwouldbe good,but how could thet owncontrol ven dingof baked good s,ice
crea m,etc.,andshe felt that c rite ria shoul dbe li sted.Ryan des cr ibed how
this was handl ed i nt he Bou lder mall:Certain area swere se tas ide for certain
types ofvending wit h only oneyear le ases.Donov anfe ltvending wa sagold mine
because t he owner would not have topay rent ,and s he woulds upport the po pcorn
~agon,butnot much e lse.Viele shared Don ov an'sconcern,andhe a ntic i patedan
expans ionof thi s typeofconditional use in to other districts besides SDD6.
Ryan admittedt hat he had rec eived 4 or5 oth erre ques ts for various typesof
vending includin g alo w frequency radio sta tion for skiers..
Co rcoran stated that un der cond itional use perm it s,onlyafe w criteri a had to
be met,so if ana pplicantmet th ec riteria,t hePEC wou ldhave t o grant t her equest.
Van Ewi ng suggested c hanginghis r equest toa s pecif ic use,a nd Troutwondered
if th ere would beanything wrong wit ht ha t.Trout move d and Vie le se condedt o
approveth e r equestto haveanout side po pcor n ve nd i n~on to conform i n appea rance
with thos eexist ing in Va i l.Th e votewas 4-0 in favo rofr ecommending this t o
Counc il .
9.Request for a minorsubdiv isi on for l ots 15 a nd 16 ,Buf fehr Creek.
Applic ant s:Ran dy Gue rri ero and Angel a Le ighton
Pete rPat tene xp lained t hat t his wa sa minorsubdivi si on and that the re we re t wo
conditionsofa pproval.Randy Guerr ier.o,one of the app li cants,s tated that his
pla ns d idi nclude cl eaning up th e parking lot .Pa ttenadded t hat he had a l e tter
fro m asurvey company which i ndicated that th is was a n equ al trade-off.
Troutm_ove dand Viele second ed t o approve the re qu e st \~i th t he word s,"the lot"
in con dit ional #2 bechangedto r ead"lot 15".The vote wa s 4-0 infavor .
10.Pte l im i na?r evi e ~I~<i.f~rior modif ica tion proposals in CCl a nd CC Ire sulted
1n t he f o lo wingl3esignations:
Mi nor
Gorsuch
Chr isty Sp orts
Purc ell's
LionsheadArcade
Vill age Center
Sw eet Basil a nd
Ma jor '
Lod ge at Vail
A &0 Bu ilding
Ill u's Bea nery
••
Planning and Environmental Commission
June13,1983
9:00 am Site Inspections
10:00 am Publ icHearing
1.A request torezone Treetops Condominiums from the High Density Multiple
Family (HDMF)zone district to Commercial Core IIzone district and
a request for an exemption toallowaloadingspace within the required
front setback.Applicant:Treetops Condominium Association
2.Request for a conditional usepermit for aday care facility on lot 34,
BuffehrCreek Subdivision.Applicants:Mike and Debbie Dawson
3.Request for a conditional usepermitin order to build anantennaeon
thetopofthe Chamonix Corners building,part of Tract C,Vaildas Schone
Filing No.1 Applicant:Rand L Communications,Inc.(KVMT-FM)
Approximately12:00 noon Lunch (approximately 45 minutes)
4.Request for an amendment to Sections 18.04.030,18.22.090,and 18.24.130
in order to increase the number of accommodation units allowedinthe
Commercial Core I and the Public Accommodation zone districts.
Applicant:Lodge Properties,Inc.
5.Request for a variance from Section 18.13.080(A)which restricts one
unit inaPrimary/Secondary zone to 40%ofthe allowable GRFA.The
application concerns lot 11,Block E,Vaildas Schone Filing #1.
Applicants :I.M.and T.K.Turnbull
6.Request for an amendment to Section 18.26.040 oftheVailMunicipal Code,
Conditional usesinCCII,in order toadd:G.Commercial storage as
longas it is base ment level,nothavingany exterior frontage onany
public way,street,walkway ormall area.Applicants:Bradley Quayle
and Michael Arnett .
7.Request for an amendment toa conditional USe permitin order toallow
theVail Mountain School tousetheBaldauf Cabin asageneralpurpose
classroomandsmallmeeting assembly room.Applicant :Vail Mountain School
8.Requestto amend Special Development District No.6,The Vail Village
Inn complex,to add outside vendingasa conditional use.
Applicant:Van Ewing
9.Request fora minor subdivision for lots 15 and 16,Buffehr Creek.
Applicants:Randy Guerriero and Angela Leighton
(Continued)
•PEC 6/7 /8 3
10.Preliminary reviewofExterior Modification proposals in CCl and CCII
for the following buildings:
1 ..Lodge at Vail
2.McBride .Building-Gorsuch Ltd.
3.A &DBuilding
4.Plaza Lodge Building-Christy Sports
5.Lifthouse Lodge -Purcell's
6.Lionshead Arcade
7.Village Center
8.Gore Creek Plaza BUilding -Sweet Basil and Blu's Beanery
~.D~M ay 16,1983
APPLICATION FORM FOR
CONDITIONALUSEP ERMIT
I.This procedure is required for any pro ject required to obtain a
co nd i t ~9~1 Use Permit.
The appl ication will not be accepted until all information is
s ubmitte d.
A.NAME OF APPLICAN T R andL Communications Inc.(KVMT-FM)
ADDRESSlOOO L i onsridge Loop,Vail,CO.81657 PHONE 476-5868
PHONE 926-3907
B.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Bob Dorf-----------------
ADDRESS P.O.Box 1,Edwards,CO 81632
C.NAME OF OWNER (p rint ort ype)Craddock Development Inc.
(See bottom of Page)SIGNATURE_--..:...;:;..::-=--=-=:..===-==--=-==-='-'-_
ADDRESS Box 7221,Colorado Springs,CO 80907 PHONE -------
D.LOCATIONOFPROPOSAL
ADDRESS 22 71 Nor th F rontage Rd.Vail,CO 81657 (C hamonix Corners)
Filing Part od!BLOCK CBlockLEGALDESCRIPTION.-=L:.::o:.::t=----=-=:.c::..::.c.:....__-=-=::..:::.:~~=_=~......:;..:=____=;:.;:;....;=..:.._=:.._
A list of the name of owner s of all property adj a cent to the
FEE $50.00 p lus a n amoun t equal t o the th enc urrent first-classpostage
rat e for eac h prop ertyowner t o be notif ied he reunder.
CRA DDOCKDEVELOPME NT CO MPANY
Den ver Branch Ma nage r
subject property'
1.~RAC~A -Phillips Gas S ta tion
§o~~0~9troleum p roperties,Inc.
E vergreen,CO 80439
2.Inn at West Vail -T ractC
C raddock Development
Box 7221
Colo.Spr ings,CO 80907
3.~lock A,Lots 1,2,3.
Craddock Development 1 nc.
(Same as abo ve)
,.;lt.;":~,
v·••
Hand L C o rnm un ;I';ll,l U ll ",own e rx <I\1d "[H,l'<ILo!'s of KV ~!T-I")I :I!',}
s ubmitt ing tn i.s a p pl i c.a t i on ill c(l mpl i un c«.wit h t.h r:"",u'llt ly
app ro v ed a mmcnd r!\('lll t o t h o ZOll :iIl L~<:I H \"th a L allows !C l,'u :e
in c L u si.o n of H :i(ii():'l1d '1\;']8 V i~';H)1l :.i l':n:1 1 rol u.y t ra n:-;;nI "':;l on
fa c t Lit i.e s HS :1 c'(llH i i t io n;1 1 lIS('i n T lt i"Co rarno r o i al Cl./;'"l IT
LO 11 e D i ~;t r i <'I •
K V~lT J s cu rrc n t.}v ('\I !I"t!'uc Lio (!;:1 n o w -;IUllj')to Infocd 'li "c::,-
pand i n g r ('(Jl :1 J'C I Il:'1l ~:'u J'wha t w a«o n cv -~\s ma ll rnd io ';1.:1.11011 .
i\s i de f rom t he ,'ompl \:.\:l'c,c!cl'al n'ql!i 1"'!rw nLs lWC C':;S:ll ')'Lo ma k o
:"n c b a mo vr-n n d i ll U I'd,'r to r 11:';U ,;','m:lin o n t he a il'wi th m in i -
m um t n t.c rr uo tr on t n ;:~C'l ·v i c'.e ,.i :.1 c.~t l('i·t'~",,:-.,:I r y to C:U !I,-;t.l"t i (.:t <I u e«
STL (St,nell l ::TI ':~n :;rni 1 1,,1'L i nk ):!,1.!I",!·;i de ·o f'0 11 1'II l '\',';;i.lldi os .
0 ne ei f rc L oca l:i 1);1 o n ~3i L e'\Ap ",.'11 <1 i>.'\I (On roof of building)..~"------_..•.--------_.~_.----_."--'--._--._._..
7 01 1'1'(H ~llh(~\·~-l ~;1..~-;i de ~)j'el l!':1\t i lt d i 1l1 !:a nd ti'l l'~jl ~:i l l !'f r'o n t
o j'l 110 bu :I (\i !l :,'>
J.)ps('.r intoj ()n o f '\l \t("'t !n :l
.~..._---_....."'----_.._--_.-..--"
;Ii.L ite t .o o o t
:,I.r II c:"U ]','],~'
dix B)
Ap p r-ox im .r t.c l ',I ~~"I ll 'lo w t.h o ,")I'nl"",'II,'c Lu I'
Ant e nu u ::i.tl (l ~)~'n 11·l l.'v .ls -io n t ~.:P (';I n l·.\l ~tl :l ~~"-i "
tll )!':'P (A pp e nd i -;(').
I II i );I I ,I I'
(.\P I H "11 -
w i i I ':.;1 "y'a ;:.:i
I (l tl ~j:an d t":~'!
1~:
'(':':~.A-:
,,;'
,,
Til e c o rn p l c rv ,'~T i ,i :i l:1 1 \~m in i nuun hl 'i~:I IL 11{'('c s s:tr'y ;~~,'l"I(:cL
goo ,l L r:lnS l1Ii :i:-;i o ll irorno ur S Ll ld io \Il <Jilt'\1';l l1s1;1\."I ':11,P o la-
t o Pat c h :111<1 i s :t l ii \\'p owc r cd <I "\'i ,',>s p f:('il'i c a l l::"pl'l'o v "d
h y t he h 'd !'r :1 i l '<l1:iI!l Il !1 i rn t .i OI I:,('I 'lIl lll i:·;:,i on ['01'l.1':I I J>:"li :;:;i o n
w it.h in n:ldio \·\;)!](h ,'x ('!U ~,i Vl'l ~a ll"\':III'(\by t.h c-1 '.(1"1'U ;';('
b~i \)ro n ,k :1 ~:1 ",':.;.
Alternatives
•The only alternative to the proposed Studio Transmitter
Link would be to use telephone lines from the new studio
location to our current transmitter located in the Vail
Run building.
Various factors make this alternative a less than viable
one.
(a)The reliability of equalized telephone lines in
tandem-necessary for stereo transmission-in the
Vail Area,is suspect.
(b)The audio quality of telephone lines for stereo
transmission is less than the quality that our
station is striving for.
(c)The telephone lines would carry the signal from the
Chamonix Corners building to the current transmitter
thereby precluding the removal of the current
STL from Vail Run.
POST OFFICE BOX4580
MEDFORD,OREGON 97501
(503)779·6500
SCALA ELECTRONIC
CORPORATION CA5·450
COMMUNICATIONS VAGI
-APP8ND;"II~"
2CA5·450V
ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Frequency Range:
Impedance:
Gain(over dipole):
VSWR:
Front-to-back Ratio:
Input Power Rating:
Polarization:
Termination:
Net Dimensions:
Net Weight:
Shipping Weight:
Wind Load:
Mounting:
Any specified frequency 216to1000MHz
50 ohms
10db
1.3:1 maximum atFc ±0.6%
1.5:1 maximum atFc ±1.0%
18db
100 watts
HorV (rear-mount,adjustable)
TypeN female (mates with UG-21/U)
MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS
(CA5-450 at 460 MHz)
27"X13"X 5"
4 pounds
7 pounds
25 pounds (100MPH with 1/4"ice)
Attaches to circular support with maximum
2-3/8"0 .0.
17·80
:
SCA LA ELECTRO
CORPORATION
POST OFFICE BOX4580
MEDFORD,OREGON 97501
(503)779·6500
APPLICATIONS:
•AURAL BROADCAST STL
•TELEMETRY
•POINT·TO·POINT
COMMUNICATIONS
•j~I''p£N1:'/'"1'6"
MF·960
MINIFLECTOR™
FrequencyRange:
Impedance:
Gain(overd ipole):
Maximum VSWR:
Front ·to-Back Ratio:
Polarization :
Term ination:
Net Dimensions:
NetWeight:
Shipping Dimensions:
Shipping Weight
WindLoad:
ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS
940to960MHz(Broadband)
50ohms
14db
1.3:1
23db
V
TypeNFemale(mates with UG-21/U)
MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS
16"x18"x 46%"
12pounds
16Y2"x 18Y2"x47"(Approx.8.3cu .ft.)
16 pounds
137 pounds (100MPH with 1/4"radial Ice)
MINIFLECTOR™ISAREG ISTERED T RADEMARK
OF SCALA ELECTRONIC CORPORATION
15-80
•
Pierce sugg ested changin g the property line between Guerriero andthe property
tothewestto eliminate theangleofthe lot line and accommodate his addition.
Piper moved and Donovan seconded to deny there quest for the variance stating
thef inding that t he granting oft he variance woul d const itute a grant of special
~rivi1ege.The votewas 5-1 infavorwith Trout against the denial.Trout
idnotfeelthegrounds for denial were proper.
3.Re uest to amend Section 18.26.030 Conditional Us
hardware for the rela ofthe radio and tel evisi n
transmitter site asacondlt iona1 use..Applican .
Peter Jamar described the request.The discussion which followed revealed that
the members 1 main concernswlththeamendment were the aesthetics and appearance
ofthe relay facilities itself.They were remind ed that th is would betheconcern
ofany specific conditional use request.Bob Dorf,oneofthe applicants,explained
that atoweror possibly adish was necessary in order to bounce radio signals from
PotatoPatchtoVail Mountain.He was reminded that the actual relay facilities would
have to come before the PEC for a conditional use request..
Viele moved and Piper seconded to recommend to Town Council the amendment to
Section 18.26.030 Conditional Uses,to include r adio and television signal relay
transmission facilit ies asa conditional useinthe Commercial Core III zone
district.The vote was 6-0in favor.
4.A request torezone lot 6,VailLionshead 1st Fil ing (Treetops Condos)from
the HighDensity Mu ltiple Fa mily zone district tot he ·Co mmercia1 Co re I I
zone district andto allow a loading space withint he reguired front setback.
Applicant:Treetops Condominium Associat ion
Peter Jamar showed theboardtheLionsheadzoning map indicating where Treetops
was located.He showed the proposed si te planexplaining that if therezoning
were approved,Treetops would haveto come backthroughthe PEC withan application
for Exter ior Alteration for CC II.Ja mar stated that the staff was recommending
tabling for 60 days for further study during which timethe applicant would conduct
astudy addressing traffic and circulation problems.Jamar showed a ti me lapse
filmoftheareatakenduring2hoursinthe morning and2hoursinthe afternoon
ofthe Monday of President's weekend.He stressed that the staff needed to know
how the commercial spacein Treetops would affect this areaintermsof traffic and
circulation,as this is already the most congestedareain town.
Peter Looms,architect for the project,stated that thepurpose was to improve
Treetops.He felt that the addition would notadd problems tothe area,adding
that parking was by permit only.Ted Strauss,president of Treetops,stated that
there were rarely any cars parkedonthetopparking level,eveninthe busy day
shown inthetime lapse film.He added that storing the snow in that area had
causedTreetops$20-30,000in costs to repair sewer lines.
Pierce felt it would be best notto have loadin g right where pedestrians would
cross,butperhapshave this onthewest side.Strauss pointedouttha tt he Lionshead
Lodge had their trash stora gei n this same are a.Vieleas ked aboutTOVplans
fo r ped estr ians int heareabetwee ntheVill age andLionshead,and J amar r e pl ied
that th ere r eally ha dn'tbeen anystudy don e,a lthoughi t had been .con si dc l"ed ~ur in g
t he wor k do neonthe Urban Desi gn Guide Plans.J am arexplained th i swas ades i rabl e
connectionto hav e to lin k the Villa ges.
••-.
RECEIPT -TheTown of Vail
N?23728 ·_______•19:z.__DATE
RECEIV ED FROM
ADDRESS _
______________DOLLARS $_
PermitNumber s _Police ReceiptNumbe rs _
HOW PAID-Cash Check _By ---'_
•PEC 4/25/83 -3-•
Viele was concernedabout traffic and circulation problems .Jamar said that when
therezoningdid take place,Treetops would hav e to present a ~ecific development
planwith specific numbers,site plan,etc.,sothe project would belocked into
a specific plan,and that Treetops would have t o come back a ndask for any changes
inthe future.Corcoran added that theycould come inunder Exterior Alterations.
Piper stated that the film showed much pedestrian traffic coming from the Village which
surprised him.He felt that the Treetops addition would make a stronge r tie to
the Village and was an improvement.Donovan felt that the location was a good
one for commercial activity after seeingthe traffic pattern inthe film.She
felt that the building shouldbe low andappeartobe tied into the present Treetops
condo building and into Lionshead.She felt that thetypeof retail spaceshould
be restricted so that shops that encourageauto traffic such as liquor orski
repair would notbeallowedinthe space.Donovan felt that it was timethe TOV
did something for the pedestrians walking between theice rink andLionshead.
Trout felt that the addition was good and echoedthe Gage Davis (Urban Design
Plan)study.He felt theplan was a positive one.Corcoranaskedabout tabling
°theplantoa specific date,and Jamar cautioned the applicant that theplan
would have to come before the PEC under Exterior Alterations inCCII.The next
application date for this is May 23,theone after that is November 28.
Jamar said that the staff would like tohave15daysin which toreview the proposal
after it had been submittedtothe staff.Strauss requested to table until June13.
Trout moved and Donovan seconded to table the request torezone until June13
asperthe applicant's request.The vote to table was 6-0.
5.Requestto amend Section 18.64 Nonconformin g Sites,Uses,Structures and
Site Improvements,to include language which will allow for interior expansion
of pre-existing legal non-conforming uses for additional GRFA.Applicant :
,RichardS.Baldwin
Peter Patten explained that the amendment would essentially allow additions to
any building whic h meetstheproposed criteri a,butonly applied to those buildings
which we re currently non -conforming with respect t o GRFA.He reviewedth e memo which
explained thereasonsfo r the request.said that the staff f elt that although
theimpactontheneighborsmightnotbe great,the ov erall impactcouldbe great.
Rick Baldwin said that it seemed the staff was implyinga fear of creating inequities
when i nequities alr oeady e xisted.He added that any new construction would have
to come beforethe Town,and that this amendment would notpr event others from
applying for a variance.Baldwin stressed that he felt it was the numbe r of units
which controlled density,not GRFA.He added that there were problems withthe
GRFA method of controlling density.
Trout questioned GRFA also,since there werea number of ordinances which controlled
in other ways .Donovan felt that controlling nu mbers of units didnot control
density ina resort area,and supported GRFA asa control ofdensity .Piper
asked if one cou ld changeagarage into GRFA undertheproposed amendment ,and
Patten replied that it could obe done,but that many other criteria would also
have tobemet .
•PEC -4-
Ba1dwin felt that oncethe building was in place,the owner shouldbeallowed
tousethe interior space.Donovan stated that there would beimpactson traffic
and sewage with more peopleusingthespace.Viele was concernedwiththetheory
of expanding non-conforming uses,butcouldnotseeany detrimental effect norany
real increase in density by allowingane xpansion of existing non-conforming structures.
Pierce mentioned that he,beingan"old timer,"had seen many methods usedin
the Town to control density,and felt that GRFA,whileprobablytheworstsystem,
was the best anyone had come up with.He added that hedidnot feel that someone
who had been herea number of years shouldhave more privileges thana newcomer,
though perhaps it couldbetaken on acase by case basis.Pierce suggestedperhaps
givinga ceiling of5%of GRFA and setting atime limit.He felt that useofspace
below grade would begood.
Trout was concernedaboutnot eliminating parking.Patten reminded him that there
were parking requirements,anyway.Corcoran felt that if someone were allowed
touse their garage for living space,they would be quite likely to come back
and ask for a variance so that theycould add a garage.He felt more in sympathy
withthe amendment if it applied onlyto low density residential zones,but felt
that a variance shouldbeasked for ineach case.Corcoran added that he was in.
favorofa total rethinking of GRFA in residential zones.
Chuck Anderson stated that concern was with renovation ofthe physical plant,
that the Town was at a point in history when renovation shouldbeencouraged,
and he felt that the issue of GRFA vsbulkshouldbe addressed.Trout suggested
the request 'be tabled and a work session scheduled.Baldwin felt that if GRFA
were to re-evaluated,he was willing to table his request.The members were polled
and Trout was sympathetic with modifications,Donovan could maybe support with
time limits,only residential zones included,and with some trade-offs.Piper
felt ,the amendment andthe GRFA question needed additional work,that there was
a problem withthe way it was presented,but felt that it was a positive step.He
didnot want tothrowout GRFA entirely.Donovan added that shemightbe able to
support it if it were toapplyonlyto buildings built before 1970 orso.
Vielesupportedthe request,but was sympathetic toDuane'sconcernofgarage
conversions.He felt that the intent was good.Pierce tendedtoagreewith Duane
and felt hecouldnotvote for the amendment in its present format.Corcoran
felt the same way and added that the PEC and Councilshould address thi?issue.
Baldwin requested tabling until June27.
Trout moved and Donovan seconded to table toJune27asperthe applicant's request.
The voteto table was 6-0in favor.
The meetingadjourned at 4:35 pm.
•Planning and Environmental Co mmission
April25,1983
1:00 pm Site Inspections
2:00 pm PublicHearing
1.Approval ofminutesofApril 11 meeting.
2.Request for a side setback variance in order to build an addition on
an existing residence on lot 15,ResubdivisionofBuffehr Creek .
Applicant:Randy Guerriero
3.Requestto amend Section 18.26.030 Conditional Uses,toallowthe
necessary hardware for the relay of the radio and television signal
totheprimary transmitter site asa conditional use.Applicant :
R.&L.Communications
4.A request torezone lot 6,VailLionshead 1st Filing (Treetops Condos)
from the High Density Multiple Family zone district tothe Commercial
Core II zone district toallowaloadingspacewithinthe required front
setback.Applicant:Treetops Condominium Association
5.Requestto amend Section18.64 Nonconforming Sites,Uses,Structures
and Site Improve ments,to include language which will allow for interior
expansionof pre-existing legal non-conforming uses for additional
GRFA.Applicant:RichardS.Baldwin
•MEMORANDUM
TO:Planningand Environ mental Commission
FROM:Departme nt of Co mmunity Development
DATE:April12,1983
SUBJECT:Request for an amendment tothezoningordinancein order to
include radio and telev ision signal relay transmission facilities
asa conditional useinthe Co mmercial Core III zone district.
Applicant:R.&L Communications,Inc.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
R &L Communications,Inc.requests an amendment tothe Co mmercial Core III
zone district in order toi nclude asa cond itional use signal r elay transmission -
facilities for radio and television broadcasting studios,which area permitted
use within the district.This change would then require that any specific
proposal for transmission facilities would go througha conditional usereview.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development staff recommends approvalofthe
requested amendment.According to experts inthe broadcasting industry,
it is necessary for FM radio broadcasting stud ios to have signal relay antennae
i mm ediately adjacent tothebroadcast studio.A condit ional usereview will
assure that the installation of this necessary equipment will be done in
the most aesthetically pleasing and unobtrusive manner-as possible.
mar ch 28 ,1983PetitionDa~~~__
PETITION FORM FOR AMENDMENT TOTHEZONINGORDI NANCE
OR
.REQUEST FOR
A CHANGE IN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES.1
r -.'r.,,
tf)
(
I.T his procedure is required for any amendment to the zoning ordinance
or for a request for a district boundary change
R &L CO MMU NICATIO NS I NC .•I'A.NAME OF PETITIONER.__~-"".........,-,""",-""""...........,..............,........._..........._
1000 L ION 'S RI DG ELOOPADDRESS_--oIL~>!.......oI~~-lL~~~~~--'PHONE 476 ;5868,
BO B DORFB.NAME OF PETITIONER I SREPRESENTATIVE.~:!...o~~_
P.O .BO X 1 ,DWAR DS ,CO .
C.AUTHORIZATIONOFPROPERTY OWNER
N/ASIGNATURE_---''''-L..::.:.-_
ADDRESS -'PHONE _
D.LOCATIONOFPROPOSAL
ADDRESS CO MME RCIAL CO RE III DISTRICT
filingblock
A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the
subject property,and their mail in ga ddresses.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION~l~o~t~_~~~~~~~~___
FEE $100 .00 p l us a n a mount e qua l to t he then current first-cl ass postage
rate for each property owner to be notified hereunder.
N/A
RECEI PT -The Town of Vail
N9 231 92
DATE ,19__
RECEIVEDFR OM ---------=-------------------
ADDRESS _
_______________________DOLLARS 5 _
PermitNumber s _Po lice Rece iptNumbers ·_
HOW PAl D-CashCheck ---
By _
Petiti on form f or Amen .to4lPning Ord or Reques t fo r ~a n ge in bo u n d~r i e s
I I.Four (4)copies of the f oLl ow.in q information:
A.The petition shall inc lude asU lrunary of the proposed r evi sion
of the regula tion s ,·o ra compl ete description of the proposed
changes in di strict boundarie s a nd amap indicating t he existing
an d pro po s e d district bou ndaries .Applican t must submit wri ttcn and/or
graph ic matcria ls s tating thc rcason s for r cqucs t.
III .T ime Requir e ments
T he Plann in g a nd Environmen tal Commission mee ts on the 2nd a nd 4th
Mondays of each mon th.A petitionwith the necessary accompanying
material must be submitted four weeks prior to the da te of the meet -
ing.Following th eP lan ning and En vironmental Comm ission me eting ,
all amendments to t hez on in g ordina nc e or distri ct bounda ry c hange
must g o to the Town Cotmcil f or fin al a ction.
•
28 MAR CH ,1983
WE THE PETITIONE RS,R &L COMMUNICATIONS,INC .,RESPECTFULLY
PETITION THAT COMME RCIAL CO RE III DISTRICT CODE 18.27.030
BE AME NDED TO ALLOW TRANSMISSION FACILITIES ,INCLUillING
SIGNAL RELAY ANTENNAE FORRADIO AND TELEVISIO N STUDIOSAS
ACONDITIONALUSE .QUALITY SIGNALSFOR F M MA NDATE IMMEDIATE
ADJACE NCY OFAMIC ROWAVE TO WE R TO THE STUDIO .
SECTION 18 .27 .020 ,PE RMITTED USES ,ALLO WS FORRADIO AND TELEVISION
STUDIOS BUT UNFORTUNATELY OMITS THE P ROVISION FOR THE
NECESSARY HA RDWA RE FOR THE RELAYOF THE RA DIO AND TELEVISION
SIGNAL TO THE P RI MA RY TRANS MITTER S ITES •
r-
!
I
!
I
I
1
(TY PE )
.-.......--..~_..;l_~-~__e-_..,.
Z mll NG_O '$TR1cT'_
(C OH T fol 'S L ICENSE )
5{/
r3 lJ~U)I~JG PERM ~T -
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
11 58
(P ROPOSED USE )
.(STRE ET)[NO.)
OATE
Cri'!-:!:1.,cl!:i)l:)ve lo};r.cnt:
P.cf~r.to 'Dui.,Irlinc;P~rl;ti t fl1015 fer [;1 1;0 p l zm an G ~:,:m Gra.l .bui:[di ll U.:.:,J::::,~1 :..:1:_
f o.t'C;~.:U:70n.:!;r CO .r!l~rs .
,,
Rt:lt l..m :~G DI VISION OF
"'C '/""'n ;,H "r n o'."O'{"l Z9t:-.J I..:.t .......'J I't.--,r-,-.~'"-'
COU;::"::lmh:.!::,;e,:,;;CO.--Pi l.(303)323 ·6 33 9
"
P ERM I T T O TCll<!!nt r:or:,-Ccr,;!:urg 21 (__)
(T YPE Of I MP R OV;:M tfoiT)N O.
.A ODRES$
1
I .
-c
uo BU I LOING ISTOB E F T.WIO E BY FT .LO NG BY FT.IN HEIG HT AN Il SHA LL CONF ORM IN CO ~ST R U CT I ON
ill "
o !&ZT O T YPE __'-USEGROUP BAS EMENT WALLS Oil F OUNOAT I ON ,--_
::;
0:o
11.REMARKS :
:l:BETWE EN --....==:-:===A NO ....::::;=:-~;::::::7----------
~
"
"
..-
:.....-,j.'.,,.
\
••I
,'
,;.
";"'~
DEP :,RTW'::NTAL APPROVAL F OR CER TIF IC ATE
of OC CUPANCY and C O ~lP LI ANCE
,"\'.::1"'-To be fille d i n by e ach div isi on indicated hereo n
u pon \"0rflrde r.ion of i1 s f inc.l i nspe ction .---
B:JI LDJNGS
-J??
Auo roved b';·_~.£-::"7......';-J
j
I
j
i
1
l
I
I,
I,
H e:narks _
1'."P LUMl3lNG Permit No._
Approved by Date --;-
R ema rks _
ELECTRICAL Pe rmit No._
A pproved by D ate _
L _'
R emarks _
OTHER Permit No.-:--_
.!
.:~..........'--;
0_.--1---
A p proved by .D ate -'--'-_
~~,R emarks _''.'---'=-_
OTHER -,-__Pe rm it No.__=__-,-:--_
A pprovedhy -'-_
Re marks
••
BUILDING DIVISION OF
EAGLE COUNTY,P.O.BOX179
COURTHOUSE,EAGLE CO.-PH.(303)328-6339
BUILDING
PERMIT
DEPT.FILE COPY
V ALID ATION
(tONT R'S LI CE NSE )
DATE
Craddock Development
PE RM IT N o .1l5 8
Denver Co
(STR EET)
(PROP OSEDU SE )
N UMBEROF
PE R MITTO Tenant Work-Century 2l l__l ST ORY --;-:===-::-:-::-:-D WEL LIN G UNITS _
(TYP E OF I MP R OVEME NT)NO.
(N O .)(S T RE ET)
Chamonj x Corne rs
(CR OSS STREET)(CROSS S T RE ET )
:::BETWEEN -==,."....===-A ND --,,=.,..,...-===_QL.....:.:;;;.:::.:...:..:.;:;.:.,;:.:.;;,.:..:;,;,:,.:,:..;:.:.;;,:.:....:.....I
~SUBD IVISION Vai 7 naS Schone LOTLOTBLOCKSIZE _
(TYPE)
(CUB I C/SQUAREFE ET)
OWNER West VailDe velopment,c /o Jay Peterson
ADD RESS Va il,Co.81 657
[Affidaviton reverse sideof application to be campleted by authorized agent of owner)
•
INSPECTION RECORD
•
DAT E N 0 T EP RO G R E 5 5 -C R I T I C I 8M 8 A N D R EM A R K 8 I N8P E C TO R
','"'.,..':-'.
"")-"0 ;':.-:'{..,.'~-,-"1 ~'·."..':'C ,f
,../.'.,:J .,'.-:~.~
'"ie:':"',''.,,..'"~!::e-:,,;'
-..','"""'''-;.-,..~:>
"".;.,"
"...•C•
"
"".,'..",.,,.~~i~(i.~.~."""
..,,...',..,~\",.
"
'~,..,.
"...'.-......
"
"
••BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
J urisdi ctionof _
Applicantto complete numbered spaces only.
1
osz
"•
o··oo•"·•J OB "DDR 1:55
LOT N O.
(OSEE.ATT A CH(D SH EET I
P H ON EARCHITECTORDESIGNER
4 ~"....e~-('I'OPU~
.......IL A OOI'lE SS
~uN/OAf 9~..4Z0z
L IC E:NS EN O •
g-qq<f
PHONE:
I.EH O Eft
6
USE 0"aU ILOING
7 d CMM1!:'J!-GJAL-
M AIL AOOlllE5 S
-,-.....6 S'i""~eire.
MA.IL ....O DRES S
LICENSE NO .
170-315 I
BRANCH
8 Class ofwork:~E W DADDI TIDN OALTERATION o REPAIR o MOVE o REMOVE
9 Describe work:1N T~1ZJo.e..'t=J~-",P-EO(I~ilJJq
10 Chang eofuse fr om
Chan ge ofuse t o
11 Valuation of w ork:$:r -Z I 1 41 ~P LAN CHECK FEE IP ERM IT FEE p.:fV
SPECIALCONDITIONS :
1-------------------------.----1 S izeo f B ldg .
(Total)SQ.F t.
Occupancy
Gr o up
N o.o f
Stories
D ivision
Ma x .
oee ,Lo ad
AP P L I CA Tl O ~ACCEPTED B Y .PL ANSC HECKEDBY
No.of
Dwell ing Un its
U se F ire S prink lers
Zone R equ ir ed D ves O NO
O FFS TREET PARK ING SPACES'
Covered I U ncovered
NO TICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMB·
lNG ,HEATING ,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VO IDI F WORK OR CONSTRUC·
TION AUTHORIZ ED ISNOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS,OR
I F CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED
FORA PERIOD O F 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFT ER WOR K IS
COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION A NDKN OW TH E SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT .
ALL PROVIS IONS OF L AWS AND O RDINANCES GOVERN ING THIS
TYPE OF WORK WIL L BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPEC IFIED
HEREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
PRESuME TO GIVE AUTHORI TY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THEPRO~PNS OF A CN"y OTHfE R STATE OR LOCAL LAW R EGULATING
CON~T )UCTION I"TH PE RF ORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTI ON .
~.....16Jl1.c4:""
Special Approvals
ZONING
H EALTH DEPT.
F IRE DEPT .
SOIL REPORT
OTHER (Speci fy)
R equired Re ceived Not R equired
(OATEI
WHEN PROPERLY V A LIDATED (INTH IS SPACE'T HIS I SYO UR PERMIT
CASH
SICN ATU"E 0 1"OW NEII:.,.OWNEII:B U ILOE"]
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
F orm 100.11·77
C K .M.O.
OATE )
PER M~'7J;d:
INSPECTOR
//58
M.O.CASH
1•••BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION,
0 <>s ·z
Jurisdiction of ~•·0
0•Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.~•·Jo e AOD R [55 J:-'!c:•r ~H-"'1,-I ':1,-_1 It-I
L OTNO .
,SL K IT RACT ,
(O SEE.AT TACHeD SH EETILE.A L I1OEseR.--OWN£A -M AI L "00 "£.5 5 .,,"PHO N E
2 1 .....T ~-
CONT RA CTO R ""A IL.AD DR ESS PH ONE L ICEN SE NO .
3 -,
I ,I ~"......-.
A R CHITEC TOR DESI GNER M Al L ....CD RE SS PH O NE:L I C ENSEN O .
4 I I ~.,-1 -ENll lNEE R ........I L.A CD RE SS PHO NE L I CE NSE N O .
5 .-L EN DEI'I ........I L AOO RE.SS BR....NCH
6 ·
U SEO F B U IL DING
7 --
8 Class ofwork:DNEW o ADDITION o ALT ERATION o REPAIR o MOVE o REMOV E
9 Descr ibe work:I -;.-",
•
10 Change ofuse from >
Change of uset o
I
,
I PERMIT FE E11Valuationofwork:$•I I P LAN CHECK FEE
SPEC IAL CON DITIONS:T ype 0'Occupancy
Cans t.G roup Di visi on
Size of Bldg .N o.of Max .
(Tot.l )Sq .F t.Stories occ .Load
F ire U se Fire Sp rink le rs
APPLICA TION ACCEPTED BY :PLA.NSC HECKED BY APPROV ED FOR I SSUAN CEBY Zone Z one Required DYes DNa
N o.of OFFSTRE ET PA RKING S PACES,
Dwelling Units cove-eo I U ncovere d
NO TICE Special Approvals Required Received Not Requi red
S EPA RATEPE RM ITS ARE R EQUIRED FOR EL ECTR ICAL ,PLUMB·ZONING
I NG.H E AT ING .V E NTI LATING OR AIR CONDITIONING.HEALTH OEPT .
THIS PERM IT BECOMES NUL L AND VOID IF WDRK OR CONSTRUC·
TI ONA UTHORIZED ISNO T COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS.OR FIRE DEPT .
IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUS PENDED OR ABANDONED SOIL REPORT
FOR A PERIOD OF 1 20 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS
COMMENCE D .OTHER (Specify)
I H EREBY C ERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AN O EXAMINEO THIS
APPLIC ATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.
AL L PROV ISIONS OF L AWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPEC IFIED
H EREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
P RESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TD VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PROV ISIONSO F A NY OTHE R STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGU LATING
CONST RUCT ION O R THE P ERFORMANCE OF CONST RUCTION .
l ,41'(,:,II 4
"ONA T URE 0'C r TRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED A.ENT IDATE)
$1 liNA T URE 01"O WNE'"IF OWNER BUIL.DER.DAT E)
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT /1.5 .Y
PLANCHECK VALI DATION CK.M.O.CA SH PERMIT VALIDATION CK.M .D .CASH
•.L 7 J
Form 100.1 1-77 EXTRA COPY.
S :l ?bO"r:~O 70'a 50 1.,1.
fSl~••N.549 8
eJC'
~~=FiRST V1ESTl»fD JlOl lAL
P.o.Box 7221 Zip80933
LAK~O.CO LCRADO
301Garden of the GodsRoad ,80907
Colora do Springs.Colorad o 821t~;~
PAY TO THE OR DER O F DATE CHECK N UM BERD ISCO U NT AMOU NT
~LE couA/T'(l IO ...4·1b -•
DETA CH BEFOR E OEPOS ITi NG
DA TE IN V OI CE N O .R EFERENCE
DISCO UNT
ACCT.N O .A M OU NT OR N ET A MOUNT BALANCE
DEDUCT IONS
J D ~4 -1b ~GO
C EAJ7/J 12 1 "21
pcym;f
~---
•1?t-'1 IcJ I n,
C ~~/'/..c oe.A.e 12.'.
i
CRADDOCKDEVelOPMENTCO .
COLORADO SPRINGS.COLORADO 80907
Date Referred
-EAGLE COU NT Y BUILDIf'~E R MIT APPLl CA 110N .e
FINAL:C/O I NSPECTION I LAN DSCA PE INSPECTION FORM
Review Routing Form (/)Primary Routing ()Rerouting
0.h/1-(/~-to.ft-M~
Applicant
/t sr
Perm it No.
-~~L :(2 "
Loca~e5~Pf anriiuq Commission File No ,_
Review and return tothe County Building Official with in 6 working days
Comments:e€F~7D A I /II ll lAlG
8 ~.I /)d£'lVI<I01L BUlL Olv9 I"t l1A.J
Planni ng:Compl ies wi th:
Subdivi sion R egulations
Zoning Regulations
Site Plan (Landscaping)
Yes No
~8
8J 0o0
Reviewed by :Date:_
/o-/'}-7#
Recommend Approval :~-/a?/tu U/~A/
V"l'e=fftT -#/01 £rae SITe"PU9V
FtJR t'1/111'-f(J1U1 X O.J,e.u~~
County Engineer:Roads
Grading
Drainage
o 0o0DOo0 Recommend Approval:_
Comments:-------------------------------
Recommend Approval:~/~
/t1'-7/~7r
Comments:---------------------r ---=----;:.===--
County Health:Water
Sanitation
Perc.test
Final Inspection:C/O
Recommend Approval
Comments:
DO
Final Inspection:L andsc ap ing
Recommend A pproval 00
Comments:------------,.--------------------
C/O Issued by _Date"----------
Final Filing Date _
-II IIS-/'-~.
REGUEST
EAGLE COUNTY
I
INSPECTf.N•BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX 179
PHONE:328 -6339
DATE /CI-19 JOB NAME
TIMERECEIVED AMPM CALLER _
BUILDING
FRAMING
PARTIAL
COVER
PARTIAL
PLUMBING
PARTIAL
MECHANICAL
VENTrLATION
ELECTRICAL
PARTIAL
,LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
o REINSPECT
FRI AMPM
?x ,::/Ai,C (I ,
READY FORINSPECTION
WED C~
Q..,.rz-..<.-~Z:
./.!-.
TUEMON
COMMENTS:......!!..-02~:;z...;~...!.-~=.-:....~~~==_........::=___'~_Z..L.::L......!_J'_!...~.....:....:_..!...._
f/t);.
DATE /-1-/9-2'<T
,I V
/
EAGLE COUNTY
BUILplNG DIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE :328 ·6339
INSPECTI N REGUEST
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED AMPM CALLER _
BUILDING COVER PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
ROUGH VENTrLATION TEMPORARY
FOUNDATION STANDPIPE ROUGH
woe S
FRAMING FINAL FINAL
SMOKE DETECTOR
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
,LOCATION:LOCATION :LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
READY FORINSPECTION
MON TUE WED THUR FRI,A M PM
COMMENTS:_
o APPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
-/'
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS :
CORRECTIONS /
-----~<::..-_--=----------"---''-=-----='-----'---''--'=-:--:::------
DATE
I
INSPECTOR
\...
EAGLE COUNTY
BUILDING DIVISION
P.o.BOX 179
PHONE :328 -6339
•INSPECTfaN
:If:IISJ!
REGUEST
7
-IDATE-L JOBNAME
TIME RECEIVED ;.:AMPM CALLER ------------------';:rr-.L-.--::.:...-~~--------------
PARTIAL
ELECTRICALMECHANICAL
PARTIAL
VENTILATION
HEATING
HOODS
PLUMBING
PARTIAL
ROUGH
STANDPIPE
woe S
FINAL
PARTIAL
COVER
PARTIAL
BUILDING
,LOCATION:LOCATION :LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
D OTHER D PARTIAL.LOCA TlON _
READY FOR INSPECTION
MON
»:
'"APP ROV ED
.,
THUR
D DISAPPROVED D REINSPECT
D UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS---------------------------------
DATE
INSPECTOR c/
EAGLE COUNTY
BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.'BOX179
PHONE :328 -6339
•INSPECT N REBUEST
DATE JOBNAME
TIME RECEIVED AMPM CALLER _
BUILDING COVER PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
VENTrLATION
TANDPIPE HEATING
FINAL woe S
FRAMING HOODS
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
LOCATION:LOCATION :LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
D OTHER D PARTIAL.LOCATION _
READY FORINSPECTION
MON TUE WED THUR
COMMENTS:-'-,----,--;--'-__
D APPROVED D DISAPPROVED D REINSPECT
D UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS---------------------------------------------------------------
DATE II
INSPECTOR ,/
ICONTFPS LICE N SE )
JOB WEATHER
BLI
PERMIT
DATE
BUILDING DIVISION 0
EAGLE COUNTY,P.O.BO9
COUR:rHOUSE,EAGLE CO.-PH.(303)328-6339
73 /(
CARD
Or:tQJ>er 1 8 19 l it P ERMIT No .~1 1 5 8
APPLICANT _-C~ufJ:fol:.t.-..LliDU~IIllIIl!m:~ADDRE SS 445 V'nlon Denver CO
(NO.)•(STREETl •
(PROPOSED U SE)
NUMBER OF211.__1 STORY =====-=:-;-DWELLI NG UNITS _
NO.
PERMIT T O flenant
(TYP E Of
(NO.)(STRE ET)
(CR OSSS TREET)(CROSS STREET)
~B ETWEEN .~~;_;;~""""'----------ANO ,~;;_;;;_;;_;_;~:;_;_----------
~
ITY PE)
______FT.LONGBY FT.IN HEIGHT ANDSHA LL CONFORM I NCONSTRUCT ION
__________BASEMENT WALLS OR F OUNDAT I ON ---,==,-_
L OT...z................_a-............L OT BLOCK S IZ E _..S UBDIV IS I ON v.u nac SCbarM<D
-c
u BUILD ING ISTOBE FT .WIDEBY0
<D
ciz T O TYPE USE GROUP
z
0:
0
u,REMARKS:
(CUBI C/SQ U AREf EET )
~~I LO ING OEPT.~--ADDRESS _-'-'=-=-=:.-=....::...--=-.=..:....::..._f1;;A
T HIS PE RM IT CONVEYS NO R IG HT T O OCCU PY ANY S TR E E T ,A L LEY O R S IDEW AL K O R A NY PART THEREOF .EIT HE R TEMPO RAR IL Y OR
PERMA NE NTL.Y .EN CROA C HME N TS ON P UB LIC PR OP E RTY ,NOT S PEC IF IC A LLY P ERMIT TED UN DER TH E BUIL DIN G C O DE ,M UST BE AP -~PRO VED B Y T H E J U RISD IC TI ON .S TREET O R A LLEY G RA DES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND L OCA TION OF PUBLIC S EWERS MAY B EO BTAINED
FR OM THE D E PA RTME NT O FP UBLI C W O RK S .THE I SSUA N C EO F THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELE ASE T H E APP LICANT F ROM TH E C ONDI T IO NS
O F AN Y APPLICAB LE SUBDIV IS ION RESTRI CT ION S.
M INIM UM O F THREE C A L L
IN S PE C TIONS RE Q UIRED F OR
ALL CO NST RUC TI ON WOR K:
I .FO U ND AT IONS OR F O OTINGS .
2 .PRI OR TO C OV ERI NGS TRUC TURAL
MEM BE RS (READ YT O LA TH }.
3.F INA L INS PECT ION B EFOR E
O CC UPA NCY .
APPROVED PL.A NS M UST B E R E TA INED ON J O B AN DT HIS
CA RO K EPT POST ED U NTIL.FI NAL INSPEC TION HAS BE EN
M A OE.WHE RE AC ERTI FI CA TE OF O C CU PANCY I S RE-
QU I RED ,S UCH B UI L DI NG SHALL N O T BE OCCU PIED UNTIL
F INA L I N SP ECT IO N HA S BEE N MADE.
WHERE APP LI CABLE SEPA RATE
PERM I TS AR E RE QUI RED FOR
ELEC T RI CA L,PLUMBING A ND
M E CHAN I CA L IN ST ALLA T I ONS.
POST THIS CARD SO ITISVISIBLE FROM STREET
B U ILDI NG I N S PE CT IO NA PP ROVA LS P LUMBING I N SPEC TION APP RO V AL S E LECT R ICA L I NSP EC TI ON A P PROVA LS
1 1 1
2 2 2
c/'J/i-;;1--'7Yhv
3 'HE ATING IN SP E CTING AP PROVAL S REFRIGERAT ION I NSP EC TI ON APP ROVALS
1 1
L ~//-J-7~Jr.;(,."
O THh 2 2
WORKS HA LL NOTPR OC EE DUNTIL TH E PERMIT WIL.L.BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION IN SPECT IONSI NDIC ATED O N T H I S CARD
INSPECTOR HAS APPROV ED T HEV ARIOUS WORKIS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX M ON THS OF DATE TH E CAN B E A RR.ANGED FOR B Y TE LEPHON E
STAGES OF CONSTRUCT ION.PERMIT IS I SSUE D AS NOTED ABOV E.OR WRITTE N NOTI FICATION.
••
:P-uP~#Jf
m~~
-1't-6 ~
~
'-.~.?o.!
~'-
lI4 'I
SIGNED
RECIPI ENT KEEPTMI9 COPY,RETURN WHITE CCPYTC BENDER
••
BUILDING DIVISION OF
EAGLE COUNTY;P.O.BOX 789
COURTHOUSE,EAGLE;CO.':'PH.(303)328-6339
BUILDING
PERMIT
I-
Z"::l -
0"::o n.
"
DEPT.FILE COPY
V A L IDAT ION
(CONT R'S LI CE NSE)
0433PE'1 M I TN O .---,-=--'---=-=
Denver,Co.
(STR EET)(NO .)
AD DRESS -=-~::;-:-==O-..;~~:-;-;--==c:...:..=->--==-=
Ma rch 8
A PP LIC AN T Gordon Mean Co.
(PROPOSED USE )
NU M BEROF
STORY -----===::-c-=-----DWE L LIN G U I~I TS _sign for W!vail Cleaner~
(TY PE O ~I M PR OV EME NT)NO.
PERM IT TO
AT (LOCA TIO N)21 31N .Frontage Rd.
(N O.)
West Vail
(STRE ET)
Z ONINGDISTRICT _
(CROSS ST RE ET)(CROS S S TREET)
~BETWEEN ----;==-==:-:,AND =""::-:::==_
Q L........;.....;.;......;...;....__-'-'--'--'
LOT~SUB DIVISION LO T BLO CK SI Z E _
-c
~BU IL D ING IST O BE FT .WI DEBY FT .L ONG B Y _
m
FT .IN HEIGHTANDSH ALL CONFORM INCONS TRUCT I ON
(TYPE)
_______BASEME NT WALLS OR FOU NDATION _
o
Z T OT YP E USE GROUP
::0
ll:ou,REM ARKS :_
81657Vail,Colo.
(CU BIC/SQUARE !'"EET)~
(AHidaviton reven..ide of applicationto be completed by authorized agent of owner)
WI Vail CIARnArR
2131 N.Frontage Road
OWNER _...n...L-"--w.,~~=.ll':a:.I:L__......,.-......,.-::_____=____=:---....,....----=----=:----
AOD RESS _-==-=--=-"-':....o.===~===_____'_=='__'=='-=--===-'-_
AREA OR $FPEERE MIT s 10.00VOLUME--;====-=-==,,-ESTI MATED COST _-===--_______~
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE
of OCCUPANCY and COMPLIANCE
Tobefilledinbyeachdivisionindicated hereon
upon completion ofitsfinalinspection.
BUILDINGS Permit No._
Approved by Date _
Remarks _
Approved by Date _•PLUMBING Permit No._
Remarks _
ELECTRICAL Permit No._
•
Approved by Date _
Remarks _
OTHER Permit No._
Approved by Date _
Remarks _
OTHER Permit No._
Approved by Date _
Remarks _
•GORDON NEON CO .•
2930 WEST 9TH AVENUE.DENVER,COL.DRADO 80204 •PHONE [303]222-1763
DATE
-----------------_.._-----
R (~t:'VE?
MI\R (};)\916 __
SIGNED
1 ....5T~UCTIO".S TO SENOre;R:I NSTRuCTI ON S T a F1f:CE;IVEIt:
I.ICI:£"ylt LLOW COPY.;J.SI:NO WHIT ~AND PINK CQPIII:S WITM CARB ON 'NTACT .1 .....~ITl.I'lIl!:"'LY.2 .Di-TACH !;;TUB,KEI:~PINK COP ....R E TUR N W HI TE C OP"TO SIE:ND IE:I't.
•EAGLE COUNTY
Eagle.Colorado
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
...3--5(
~
RE CE IVED
o F ---'<:>O:_=-.....",,"-'-"=--~.L-,I.'-.'-"'-G"""-'-'---=~--------
CASH I CH ECK :tL ACCT.
H ":T I AMO UNT
I TEM CO DE
Building Permi tFee //J ~
App licationFor
Subdivi si on App lication
Zo ne Change
Cond it ionalU se
ISpecialUseI
I
I
Var iance il
Ap pealFee I
Code :(Building)(Zoni ng)(Subdivision)
Tota l Rece ived I 112 e-o
I
11 03N?
A ll Items arerece ived fo r col lection onl y and this recei pt sha l l b ec a nce l led fo r
no'p aymento f any ite m .
1
ERMIT ABUlLI~G.D P pp I 0 -•0
z ·Jurisdiction of EAGLE C OUNTY ">.0
0•Applicant to complete numbered spacesonly ."••JOB A OOR E SS
I L OT NO .leLK IT RA CT (OS EE A TTACHEDSH E ET )L.E ;A '"1 OEse R.•
O WNER
('I ,J .~M ....I L.A DD RESS ZI·P "ONE
2 u/.i/l'lv-'..I -.J-<oJ )
3 CONTO A CTOh~r .:M A l l.A DD RE S S P H ONE l.IC ENSE NO .
ct}}fJ ./TYI)~1)",R •./II?I I ,:),:1 J _117 J ~
A RCH IT EC T CUY D E S1G N~,
M AIL Ao o ::m ~4~A ":Aj L."E N"5'"E N"O.
4 ,,-d..
EN GIN EER M A IL A DO 'H:S$~PHON E:LIC E N SE N O.
5
L E:ND EA M AI L A ODR ES S B lIlAlIl CH
6
U SE O f'a U I LDING
7
8 Class of work :~E W o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR OMOVE o REMOVE
9 Describe work :...:5~~I d /.I /.•.~'J ...t:'a ~.\
I !/J A'J 11 -e:,~LJ~_•n,~;7;_,"-"'-../,if10Changeofusefrom
Changeofuse to
11 Valuation of work :$.PLAN CHECK F EE IPERM IT FEE J A ~
SPECIAL CONOITIONWork w i thin r.n l1nt v ,.i &.t ,.nf_u",,,T yp eo f Occupancy
:1 1 _,....,.,,<c onst .G r ou p Divisi on'..''J
Ma x ..,.Si ze of Bldg.N o .o f
~..(T otal)Sq.Ft .S to ries O cc .Load
F ire Use Fi re Sprinklers
A PPLICA TIONA CCE PTED B Y ,PL ANS CH ECKED BY AP PRO VE DF O RIS SUA NC E B Y ;Z one Z on e R equ tred D ves ON o
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES,N o .o f
C o vered f U n cover edDwellingUnits
NOTICE Sp ecial Approvals R eq uired R ecei ved Not Req uired
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE R EQUIREOFOR ELECTR ICAL,PLUMB·ZONING
lNG,HEATING,VENTILA TING O R AIR CONOIT IONING.HEALTH DEP T.
T HIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID I F WORK OR CONSTRU C·
TION AU T HORiZED is NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DA YS ,O R FIRE DEPT.
IF CONSTRUCTION ORWOR K IS SUSPENDEDOR ABANDONED SO IL REPORT
FORA PERIOD OF 120 OA YS AT AN Y TIME AFTER WORK IS
COM ME NCEO.OTHER (Spec ify)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HA VE READ A ND EXAMINED THIS Cou ntyP InAPPLICATIONANDKNOWTHESAMETOBETRUEANDCORRECT.
ALL PROVIS IONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOV ERNI NGT H I S r.nl1 n tv Rn D'T YPE OFWORK WILL BE COMPLI ED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT.THE GRANT ING OFA PERMI T DOES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO V I O LATEDR CANCEL TH E
PRO VIS IONS OF AN Y OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATIN G
CONSTR UCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION .
SI GN A T U R E O F CON TRAC TOR O R AU THO RI ZED AGE NT (CA TE I
SIG NA T URE O FO WNER I r O W NE R I!IU I L DER )D ATE)
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATEO ON THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMI T
PLANCHECK VALIDAT ION M .O.CASH
I NSPECTOR
F o rm 100.1 1 1·73 REO R DER F RO M:INTERNATIONAL.C ONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFI CIAL.S.13&0 S .WO RK MAN M IL.L ROAD.WHITTIER ,C A L I ~.ue0 1
1CAONRMTA•NG
.....BUILDI PE I PPLI I 0 5s
I ~.z •
Jurisdiction of "•.0
0·Applicant to complete numbered spaces only."••
J OB AD DR [55
l.O T NO.la L.IT.A C T IOS E E ATTA CH ED SHE E T)LEGA L I1DESC".
OWNE R M A Il.ADDR ES S Z'P PH ON E
2
CONT RACTOR JoA AIL A DD RES S P H ONE L I C EN S E NO .
3 /
A RCH IT E CT O R DE SI CNER MA I L A DD RESS "HO NE L IC ENSE:N O .
4
ENG INEE:I'I M ....L AOO R ESS PHON E L IC E N S E NO .
5
LENDER M AI L A DDilil ES S BA ANC H
6
U S E Of'BU IL D IN G
7
8 Class ofwork:ONEW o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR o MOVE o REMOVE
9 Describe work:
10 Change ofusefrom
Change of use to
11 Valuation ofwork:$PLAN C HECK FEE IPERM IT F EE
SPE CIAL C ON DITI ONS :-.Typ e of Oc cupancy
'I ..'Co n st .G r o up D iv ision
Si ze 0 1Bl dg.N o .o f Max .
(T ot al)SQ .F t .S t ories oc c.Load
Fir e U se F i re S p rin k lers
APPllCA TION ACCEPTEDB Y .PLA ~S CHE CKED B Y 'AP PRQVEO F OR ISSU AN CE B Y :Z o n e Z one R eq uired DVes DNa
N o .o f OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES,
D we lli ngU nits C o ver ed I U ncov ered
NOTICE Sp ecial Approv als Re quired Received Not Required
SEPARATE PERM ITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMB·ZONING
lNG ,HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR C ONDITIONING.HEALTH DEPT .
THIS PERMIT BECOMES N ULL AND VOID I F WORK OR CONSTRUC·
TION AUTHORI ZED I S NOT COM MENCED W ITH IN 120 DAYS,OR F I RE DEPT.
IF CONSTRUCTION O RW O RK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED SOIL REPORT
F OR A PERI OD O F 120 DA YS AT A NY TIME AFTER WORK I S
COMMENCED .OTHER (Spec ify)
I HEREBY CERTIF Y THAT I HAVE READ ANO EXAMINED THIS ~,l '.'U
APPLICAT ION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE ANO CORRECT.
"'.'1 1\'A LL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING TH IS
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE C OMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
H EREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT D OES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORI TY TO VIOLA TE OR CANCEL THE
PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
SIGN AT UR E 0 ,.CO NTR ACTOIII O R A uTHOR IZ ED AG ENT (O A T E)
S I CON AT Ul'l E 0"OWNE"I F O WNER BU ILD E R)D AT EI
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PLANCHECK VALIDATION CK.M.O.CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK.M.O.CASH
E XTRA COpy
F orm 100.11 1-73 l't EO RC e:R "'R O M:INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUIL.DING OFFI CIALS.naG 5 .W ONK MAN MILL ROAD.WHI TTI ....CALI".nUt
REr
EAGLE COUNTY
INSPECflON•
DATE JOBNAME
TIME RECEIVE D AMPM CALLER "---'-_
BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX789
PHONE:328-6339
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
/
READY FOR INSPECTION
MON TUE WED THUR FRI AMPM
COMMENTS:---"-_
o APPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS____---'-~~:!L...~_
r ,
.-,
DATE
INSPECTOR
BUILDING DIVISIOF _
EAGLE COUNTY;P,O.BOX 789
COURTHOUSE,EAGLE;CO.-PH.(303)328·6339
P~t
PERMIT
...
Z o:>-
0 <
:l;a.
«
DEPT:FILE COPY
VA L1DA TlON
(C ONTR 'S L I C ENS E )
015274PE'1M IT NO .-=-=-=-=.
Colorado
(STREE T)
28
George S.Carr
M ay
(PRO POSEDUS E)
NUMBER OF
STORY --:-:=====-DWE LLING U I~ITS _Plumbi ng (Dry Cleane[s)_)
(T YPE OF I MPROVEMENT)NO .
PERMI T TO
AT(LOCATION)Veil Des Schone Sboppinfj;Center
(NO.1 (5 EE T)
ZON ING
D ISTR I CT _
(CRO !'iS STRE ET)(CROSS S TR EET)
:;;BETWEEN -;-;:=:=-==;,AN D -;-;=:;:-===_
m L..-.....;,........;,...•.;.,..__---'-'
LO T::;S U BD I VI ~I O N LOT BLO CK S IZE _
,
<
~BUILDING I S T O BE FT.WIDE B Y FT .L ONG BY _
m
FT.INHE IGHT A NDS HALLC ONFORM IN CONSTRUCT ION
(TY PE)
_______B ASEMENT WA LLS OR F OUNDATION _o
Z T O TYPE __~USE GROUP
:l;
'"ou,REMARKS :_
15 .00
(CUB I C /SQUARE r EET I
AREAOR $PER M IT $VO L UME =====--=-==:-ESTIMATED COST FEE _----'-.>!..!'-"""-__
BUILDING DEPT.BY -,,_
Mike Dawson
Vaj I ,Colorado
OWNER _--'==""---'===""'''--'-_
ADD RESS __--"c.g.LLf-'-".LLl.lL<:>l.""-_
(Affidavit on reven.side of applicationto be completed by authorized agent of owner)
••BUILDING DIVISIONOF
EAGLE COUNTY,P.O.BOX789
COURTHOUSE,EAGLE,CO.-PH.(303)328·6339
plu m b l il a
BUllDINff"
PERMIT •FIELD COpy
May 28 0152
APPLICANT George S.Carr
(CO NTR'S LICE NSE)
(PROP O SED U SE )
Plumbing (Dry CI aner~l s TORY ===::-::=~~~mNc?FUN I TS _
(TYP E OF"I M PROV EM E NT)NO.
PE RMITTO
AT(LOCATI ON)Vail Cas Schone Shoppln~C~nter
(NO.)t s EET
Z ONING
O ISTR IC T _
CCRO SS STRE ET )(CROSSS TREE T )
:BE TWEEN ....,-"=,..,..--==,,.,...ANO --:-=--:-===_..I-.........:.::.;;.:,:.:....:..;.::..:..:~.:..:::.:.::.:...:~::..:..~...J
LOT~SUB OIVIS IO N L OT BLOC K SI ZE _
-e
:5 BU ILOING IST O BE FT .W IOE BY F T.L ONG B Y FT .IN HEIGHT ANOS HALL CO NFORMI NC ONSTRUCTI ON
"'
(T YPE)
a
Z TO TYPE USEGROUP BASEMENTWALLS ORF OUNOAT I ON ,-------:_
~
0:ou,REMARKS:_
15,00
(C UBIC /SQ UARE FEET)
Mike D awson
Vel I.Colora,*,B UILO ING OEPT.BY _
...
E
CU TH
•
9
(CONTR'S LICENSE)
7.
«PROPOSED USEJ
DATE _....::=:L.__=~19 --::.....:_
Vel',
(NO.)
a..rGMt.s.
•
ZONING
AT ILDCAT ION)...l'--lU,....(lI.c..!lc:bOl!.~lttODI>liRlI-JC."'Itl.'----------------------0 I STR ICTo
_
(CROSS STREET)(CROSS STREET)
:::BETWEEN --0-=,.-,-"==,,.-AND --,======_..
LOT~SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE _
(TYPE)
..
~BUILDING ISTOBE FT.wIDE BY FT.LONGBY FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION.,
o
ZTO TYPE USEGROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION ---,,,--_:-_
:l;
a:o..REMARKS:_0 _
(CUBIC/SQUARE FEET)
Ike 0
Veil,Colo......
2
Jurisdiction of _
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
a••"•
~••oo•"••
,(OS EE AT T A C ~D S HE E T)"VIT'ACT
vaLAlOTNO.
J~./V J)J '/.--
fl '~Jl,"-4"'11.ADD R ESS P HONE LIC ENSE NO.
J .:'9 J,t ':3 S-8 '-/'/9 C;
'I .""All )tcO RESS P HONE L I CENSE NO .
MA IL ACD RESS PHO NE LI CE NSE N O .
M AIL A DD RESS 811lAHCH
ARCHITEC T D lit O E '-'GNER
4
E HGI NE EA
5
L ENDER
""A IL AODl'tlt SS ZIP P HONE
6
USE 0 1"eU 1LDlHG
7
8 Class ofwork:DNEW o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR
9 Describe work:
1I PERMIT FEES
SPECIAL CONDITIONS :A'J .J
No.TVpe of Fixture or Item
WATER CLOSET (TOILET)$
F..
/,BATHTUB
LAVATORY (WASH BAS IN)
SHOWER
KITCHEN S INK &DISP.
DISHWASHER
PLANS CHECKED BY ;APPR OvED FO R ISSUANCEBY :
~,f}'.1//
LAUNDRY TRAY
CLOTHES WASHER
WATER HEATER
J ICc
VACUUM BREAKERS
SEPTIC TANK &PIT
CESSPOOL
LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM
SEWER
FLOOR -5INK OR DRAIN
GASSYSTEMS ,NO.OUTLETS
DRINKING FOUNTAIN
SLOP SINK
WASTE INTERCEPTOR
WATER PIPING &TREATING EQUIP.
UR INAL
/
I NOTICE /
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL:AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC·
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS.OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM·
MENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.
ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT,THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
~FJ~ISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATINGO~?'~"~O"MA ~'0.consrnuc'nc•.
(~.-/~~A /'~-~1 ~~V t------i---------t----t---;
~GH ...'UfltE 91'CO NT"ACTd1't ORA UTHORIZED ....GE NT (DAT E )
PERMIT $V cf?e »
.,ON AT ••O'OW NC""OW N.'a UIL OC.)OA Te TOTAL FEE
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED liN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT /)/,"J :.J..
PLANCHECK VALIDATION
Form 100.2 9 ·69
CK.M.O.CASH PERMIT VALIDATION
G PERMIT AP LlC!TION•PLUM B 0 5~•z
Jurisdiction of ">.0
0·Applicant to complete numbered spacesonly."••Joa AODR ESS
LOT NO.leLK ITRAe T (OSEE ATTACHED SHEET)LeGAL I1OEseR.
OWNER MAIL ADDRESS z,p PHONE
2
CONTRACTOR MAIL.ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO.
3
ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAl L ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO.
4
ENGINEER M ....IL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO.
5
L.ENDER MAIL "DDPlESS BRANCH
6
USE:OF'BUIL.DING
7
8 Class ofwork:ONEW o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR
9 Describe work:
PERMIT FEES
No.Type of Fixture or Item Fee
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:WATER CLOSET (TOILET)$
BATHTUB
LAVATORY (WASH BASIN)
SHOWER
KITCHEN SINK &DISP.
DISHWASHER
APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY :PLANS CHECKED BY ;APPROveO FOR ISSUANCE BY LAUNDRY TRAY
CLOTHES WASHER
WATER HEATER
NOTICE URINAL
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOl DIF WORK OR CONSTRUC·DRINKING FOUNTAIN
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS.OR IF FLOOR-SINK OR DRAINCONSTRUCTIONORWORKISSUSPENDEDORABANDONEDFORA
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM-SLOP SINK
MENCED.GAS SYSTEMS,NO.OUTLETS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.WATER PIPING &TREATING EQUIP.
ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED WASTE INTERCEPTORHEREINORNOT,THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE VACUUM BREAKERSPROVISIONSOFANYOTHERSTATEORLOCALLAWREGULATING
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM
SEWER
CESSPOOL
SEPTIC TANK &PIT
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATtl
PERMIT $
SIGNATURE OF OWNER II"OWNER BUILDER)DATE)TOTAL FEE $
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PLANCHECK VALIDATION CK.M.O.CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK.,M.O.CASH
Form 100.2 9·69 REORDER ...·ROM:INTERN ATIONAL CONI-t:.Ht:.NCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS.5360 S.WORKMAN MILL ROAD.WHITTICR,CALIF.90601
:.
Jurisdiction of _
Applicant t o complete n umberedspaces only.
Joe "ODR E SS
2
csz
"»
CO NTRACTO R
A RCHITECTOR D ESi GNER
LEGAL I1OEseR.
O WNER
2
3
4
E NG INEER
5
L ENDER
LOT NO .I "L K ITR ACT (O SE E AT TACHED S HE ET)
MAIL ADDRE SS ZIP PHON E
MAIL ADDR E SS PHON E L ICEN S E.N O.
MA IL AODRESS PHONE LICENS EN O .
MA IL AD CAES S PHO NE LI CE N SE NO .
M A IL ADO RESS B RANCH
6
US E O F B U I LDING
7
8Class ofwork:
9 Describe work:
ONEW
I
/
o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR
PERMIT FEES
No.Type of Fixture or Item Fee
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
APPliCAT ION ACCEPTE DBY ;PL ANSCHECK EDBY :AP PROVEDFO R ISSUANC EBY:
WA TER CLOSET (TOILET)
BATHTUB
L AVATORY (WA SH BA SIN )
SHOWER
KIT CHEN SINK &DISP.
DISHWA SHER
LAUNDR Y TRAY
CLOTHES WA SHER
W AT ER H EATER
,$
NOTICE
TH IS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR C ONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORI Z ED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS.OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS S USPENDED OR A BANDO NE D FOR A
PER IOD OF 120 DAYS A T A NY TIME AFTER WOR K ISCO M -
MENCED .
I HER EBY CER TIF YT HATI H AVERE AD AND E X AM INED THIS
APP LICATION AND K N OW T HE SA ME TO BE TR UE AND C O RREC T.
A LL PR O VISIONS OF LAWS AND O RD I NA NC ES G O VE RNI NG T HI S
TYPE OF WORK WI LL BE C OM PLI ED WITH WHETH ER SPECIF I ED
HEREIN O RN OT.THE GRANT INGO FA PERMIT DOES N OT
PR ESUM E TO G IVE AUTHOR ITY TO VI OLATE OR C ANC EL THE
PR OVISI ONS OF ANY O THER STATE OR L OC AL LAW REGULATIN G
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFOR MANCEO F CONS TRUCTiON .
URINAL
DRINKING FOUNTA IN
F L OOR --SINK OR DRAIN
SLOP S IN K
GASSYSTEMS ,NO.OUTLETS
WATER PIPING &TREATING EQU IP.
WASTE INTERCEPTOR
VACUUM BREAKERS
LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM
SEWER
CESSPOOL
SEPTIC TANK &PIT
S IG NA T U RE O F C ON TRAC T O R OR A UTHOR IZED AG EN T
S IG N A T UR E OF'O W NER I F OWNER BU IL DER )
(D A T E)
D AT E)
PERMIT
TOTAL FEE
$
$
PLANCHECK VALIDATION
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED liN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
CK.M.O.CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK.I
1/
AUDIT
M .O.CASH
Fo rm100.2 9-69 R.OR DER FRO M :INTE RN ATIO NA L CO N F E.WI=.N CE OF BU ILD ING OF FICIALS.536(1 S.WOR KMA N MI LL RO AO.W H I TTI~R .C A LIF,,060t
•County Treasurer's Office,Eagle County,Colorado
/?~le.Colo..2M ~.,(?
i&rcrturll of L-~t?Lkff=~..;A!~&/~-!~6 ~?_
..Cash Book Page
fil E C .r ,HO[Q([L CO..DENVER (T I )
•19 7 s/
OOLL ARS
DEPT.FILE COPY
VA L1 DATI ON
•
BUILDING II~
PERMIT 1...-.--~~---
•
BUILDING DIVISIONOF
EAGLE COUNTY,P.O.BOX179
COURTHOUSE,EAGLE CO.-PH.(303)32B-6339
October 29
(PROPOSED USE)
NUMBER OF
(__I STORY --:-:=====----'-_DWE LL INGUN ITS _
N O.
PERMIT TO Tenant Work
(T YPE Of'IMPROVE MENT)
(NO.)
N.Frontage Rd.
(STREET)
I-70 Service Rd.at Cbamonix Rd.
(C ROSS sTREET)·(CROSS STREET)
Vajl Das Schone Filing #1
-cg BUILDING ISTOBE FT.W IDE BY FT.LONG By FT.I N HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORMIN CONSTRUCT ION
<0
(TYPE)
oZ T O TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION _
::E
0:o
..REMARKS:--.:,:=-===::-:--=-='---'::...:;:=c:::=i!-.=...:==-'=-..::..:=-=-=----'=-=-=--=-==-=-=-"'-''---'=-=--''--'==-------=---=------------
(CUB IC /SQUARE F EET)
Craddock Development CO
445 twion,La~e~~od,Co 8 022 8
OWNE R __---l.==!lL="-~=<..lJ4'w.<='"-w..t.o..._
ADDRESS --'l.'I.:lc.....l:Jn,,;l.Q~~~~~=a..,-'':O'-lS.4~a----------
AREAOR
VOLUME =====-=-==,-_
(Affidaviton reverse sideof application to be completed by authorized agent of owner)
-eBUILDINGPERMITAPPLICATION
Jurisdiction of _
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
1
osz
".
,
o·•oo•"••J Ol!A OOR E SS
"EO '"11"OTNO..Il .1ee,
l DE SCR .llJ.t-£>r ,....,1=Dl...,L .CI -
O WNE R
2(f?,U...II rx:JL "J:E \f.r:.c;>,
....AI L A ODIIl:ESS ZIP
1•.fL{S""()~I ~U J-4-1 Ir7rolnn J1
PI-IDN E
L EN DER L MA IL A.ODII:ESS
6 -See c....{JA-r I -y:I f .'U kT /SC.G C/
A RCH ITI:CT 0 "DES IGN ER
4 I d1-lIP,W'(j ---r;---j.;O Lt sc
U SE O F'B UIL DING
7 .~~vVt.r/).c (-4L-
....AI L AO DRE SS
........11.,A D DR E S ~
,P HONE
PHONE
L IC ENSE NO •
L /6 -F
LICEN SE 1Il0 .I
l.f'6f3 B
eptANCH
8 Class of work:~E W 0 ADDIT ION 0 ALT ERA TION 0 REPA IR O MOVE o REMOVE
9 Describe work :-rF~1 r4AJ r 1="L-)(U ~4./2..
10 Change ofusefrom
Cha ng e of useto
11 Valuat ion ofwork:$4 o(:;;;E;;>.aD PL AN CHECK FEE 19 ,7S"IPERMI T FEE
SPECIA LCONDITI ONS:
f----------------------------f S ize o f Bldg .
(T ota l)S q .Ft.
Occupanc y
Group
N o .o f
S tories
Divisi on
Max.
Oc c.Load
A PPLICATIONACCEPTED BY PLANS C HECKED B Y
U s e
Z on e
F ire Sprin klers
R equir ed D Yes DNa
NOTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICA L,PLUMB·
lNG,HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITION ING .
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC·
TIO N A UTHORIZED ISNOT COMMENCED WITHI N 120 DAYS,OR
IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED ORAB ANDONED
FORA PERIOD OF 120 DA YS AT AN Y TI ME AFTER WORK IS
COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ A ND E XAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAM E TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.
A LL PROVIS IONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES G OV ERNING THIS
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIF IED
HEREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT D OES NOT
PRESU,,",E TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PROV ISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULAT ING
C ONSTRUCT ION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCT ION.
N o.o f
Dwe lling Units
Sp ecial Approvals
ZONING
HEA LTH DEPT.
F IRE DEPT.
S OILR EPO R T
OTHER (Spec ify)
O FF STREET PARKING S PACES ,
C overed I Un covered
Required Rec eived Not Requir ed
SIGNA E OF'OWNEIII II"E"au DERl DATe)
..............."wHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED liN TH IS SPACEI TH ISI S YOUR PERMIT //1,./
PLAN CHECKV A LIDATION .....,CK.M.O.CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK.M.O.
~~~~<3 ~~
F orm 1 00.1 1·77 INSPECTOR
CASH
1
CASHM.O.CK .PERMIT VALIDATIONCASHM.O.CK .
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
0 ~s ·z
Jurisdiction of ">•00•Applicant to complete numbered spacesonly."•·Joe ADDR ESS
I LO 'NO.
1
m I:OACTLEGAL lOSE E A TTA CHE D S HEE T)
10E sco.••.
OW N Elit MAI L A OO "ESS ".P HONE
2 v .
CON TRACTOR fo.AA1L ADD RESS PHON E LICENSE NO.
3
AR CH IT E CT OR DES iGNER M A.It..ADD R ESS PHO NE L ICENSE «o.
4
E NGINE ER MA IL AOOR ESS PHONE LICENSE NO.
5 ,.',/.,.
LEN DElli M ....IL A ODIl:ESS 81llANCH
6
USE Of'8UILDING
7 /
8 Classofw ork:ONEW o ADDITION o AL TER ATION o R EPAIR OMOVE o REMOV E
9 Oescribe work :-",-~,-
10 Cha ngeofuse fr om
Cha nge ofu set o
11 Valuationo f w ork:$PLAN CHECK FEE I PERMIT FEE .
SPEC IAL CONDITIONS:Type of Occupancy
Const.Group Division
Size of Bldg .No.ol Max .
(Total ISQ.Ft.Stories occ.Load
Fife Use Fire S prinklers
APPLICATION AC CEPTED BY PLANS CHECKED BY APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY Zone Z one Reuutr ed DYes ONo
No.0 1 OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES '
Dwelling Units Covered I Un cove red
NOTICE Speci al Approvals Required Received Not Required
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMB·ZONING
lNG ,HEATING,VENTILATING ORAIR CONDITIONING .HEALTH DEPT.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC·
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT C OMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS,OR F IRE DEPT.
IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPEND ED OR ABANDONED SOIL REPORT
FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS
COMMENCED.OTHER (Spec ify)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE R EAD AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION ANO KNOW THE SAME T OBE TRUE AND CORRECT.
ALL PROVISIONS OFLAWS ANO ORDINANCES GOVERNING THI S
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEO
HEREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PROVISIONS OFANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
SI GNATURE OF'CONTfUCTOLl!:Olll At THOR I ZIED AGIENT (O ATE)
I.
SIGNATURE O F'O WNER .1""OWNUI:au It.EO)OATE )
W~EN PROPERLY VALIDATED liN THIS SPACE)THIS IS YOUR PERMIT lIt!
\
Form 100.1 1·71 TEMP.FIL
1
CASHM.O .CK .PE RMIT VALIDATIONCASHM.O.CK .
•BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
PLANCHECK V ALIDATION
0 ~,·z
Jurisdiction of "·\•0
0·Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.~··JO B A DD"E 5S
I .~-I COT NO.I""I I"':T (OSEE A TTAC H ED SH EE:T)LE GAL I1OEseR.I '~J .r:••.
OW NEIIl M Arl.ADD IIlESS ZI 'PH ONE
2 --(r I .I .
CONTRACTO l't MA IL "DOili E S!;P HONE LIC ENSENO .
3
t
A AeH I TEeT OR D ES IGN ER M AI L A DDRE SS PHON E L I CEN SE N O.
4
I
E NGI NE ER MAI L AC DRESS PHONE L IC EN S E NO .I
5 -II
I -t.t~'-L END ER MA I L A DD RESS It A"''''CH
6 I
U S E OF"B UI LDI NG
7 •
8 Class of work :D NEW D ADDITION DA LT ERATION D REPA IRD MOVE D RE MOV E
9 D escribe work:--
10 Cha nge o f use l rom
Cha nge 01 u set o
11 V aluation 01 wor k:$•IPERM I T FEEPLANCHECKFEE'7~...)
SPEC IAL CON DITIONS :Ty pe o f O c cupa ncy
Canst.Gro up D i vis i on -
Size of B ldg.No.o f M ax.
(T o tal)SQ .Ft.Stories occ .Load
Fire U se Fire Spr inklers
APPLICATION ACCEPTED B Y ;PLANS CHECKED BY AP PR OVED F ORISSUANCEB Y Z one Z one Required DYes DNo
N o .of OFFSTREET PARK ING SPA CES ,
Dwelling Units Covered I Uncovered
NOTICE Special Appro vals Requ ired Re ceived Not Required
SEPARATE PER MITS ARE R EQUI RED F ORE LECTRICAL,PLUMB·Z ON I NG
ING.H EATING.VENTILATING ORA IR CONDITIONING .HEALTH OEPT .
THIS PERM IT B ECOMES NUL L AND VO ID I F WORK OR CONSTRUC·
TION AUTHOR IZ ED IS NOT COMM ENC ED WITHIN t20 DAYS,OR FIRE DEPT .
IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED SOIL REPOR T
FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS A T ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS
COMM ENCE D.OTHER (Specify)
I HER EBY CER TIFY THAT IH AVE R EAD AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BETR UE AND CORRECT.
A LLP ROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORD INANCES GO VERNING T HIS
TYPE OF WORK W ILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN O R NOT.THE GRANT ING OFA PERM IT DOES NOT
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TH E
PROVISIONS O F ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING
CONST RU CTION OR TH E PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION .
SiGNATURE:OF'CONTAA.CTO~O Fl "'UTHO~l lED AGENT (DATE)
I ,
StGNATU ~E Of'OWNE~IF OWNE~e.U ILOERj DATE )
WHEN PROPERLY VALI DATED (IN THIS SPACE I T HISIS YOUR PE RMIT //(,./
>.
I ,.J.I.,I
~Form 1 00.11-77 .AUDlt
1
CASHM.O.CK .PERMIT VALI DATIONCASHM.O.CK.
••BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
PLANCHECK VA LIDATION
a <;•·z
Jurisdiction of 0 •,.aa•Applicant to complete numbered spaceson ly .0
~·J oe A.DDR E5 5
-I -"I LOT HO.I BLK Ii'~C TLEGA.L (OSEE AT TACHED S H EE T)1 e e sc n.!'.(1
OWNER MA tI.....DOlllESS z ,p PH ON E.
2 r •
COHT FlACTOAl MA IL ....OD I'tE S S P HO NE LI CENSE NO .
3 •
ARCHITECT O R DE S IG NER MAIL AD D RE S S PH ONE L IC ENSE NO.
4 ,
ENGINE ER M AIL AO D RES S PHONE LICEN SE NO .I
5 -~~I""~'.(.
~
LEN DEPt M AIL "D OAIES S B IIIANCH
6 I
U SE O F"BUILD ING
7 /•L
8 Class of wo rk :ONEW OAOO ITION o ALTER ATION o REPA IR o MOVE o REMOVE
9 Oesc ribe w ork:..--1y /L •-
10 Chang e ofuse fro m
Cha nge of u se t o
11 Va luation of w ork :$,I PERM IT FEE
,.,PLAN CH ECK FEE I 7 ..;(.v
SPECIAL CON DITIONS ,Ty pe o f Occupancy
Can st .Grou p O ivl ston ,1.5
Size o f Bldg .N o.o f Max.
(Tot al)SQ.F t.S torie s occ .L o ad
F ire Usc F ire Sp ri nklers
APPLICA TlQN ACCEPTED B Y:PLANS CHECKED BY APPROVED fOR I SSUANCEBY Zone Zone Required Dves ONo.
No.of OFFST REET P ARKINGSPA CES'
Dwelling Un its Covered I U ncovered
NOTICE S pecial A pprovals Required Received Not Required
SE PARATE PERM ITS A RE REQUIRED F ORE LECTRI CAL ,P LUMB·ZON ING
ING.H E ATING .V ENTILATINGO R AIRCO NDITIONING .HEALT HD EPT .
TH ISPE RMIT B ECOMES NULL A ND VOID IFWO RK O R CONSTR UC·
TION AUTHORIZED ISNOT COMMENC ED W ITHIN 120 DAYS,OR F IRE OE PT .
IF CONSTR UC TIO N OR WORK ISSUS PENDED OR ABANDONED SOIL REPORT
F OR A P ERIOD OF 1 20 DAYSATANY TIME AFTE R WO RK IS
COMMENCED.OTHE R(Specify)
I HER EBY C ERTI FY THAT I H AVE REAO AND EXAMINED THIS
A PPLiCATI ONA NDKNOW THE SAME TD BE TRUE ANO CORRECT.
ALL P ROV ISION S OFLAWSAND OROINA NCES GOVERNING THIS
TYPE OFWORK WILL BECOM P LIED WITH WHETHE R SPECIFIEO
H EREINOR N OT .TH EGR ANTING OF A PERMIT OOE S NOT
PR ESUME T O GIVE AUT HO RITY TO VIO LATE OR CAN CEL THE
P ROVISIONS O F ANY OTHER ST ATE OR LOCAL LAWREG U LAT ING
C ONSTRUCTION OR THE P ERFOR MANCE O F C ONS TRUCTION.
SIGNATURE OF CON TRA CTO R O R AUTHO RIZED AGENT (DA T E)
,
r r I
SICONATUAE 01"OWNER II"OWNE R BU ILD ER)DA TE'
WHEN P ROPERLY V ALIDATED(IN THIS S PACE!T HIS ISY OUR PERMIT I/l-/
i
11-'3
~Form 100.1 1-77 EXTRA COP Y,
-EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING.RMIT APPLICATION •
FINAL:C/O INSPECTI0I)J.LANDSCAP E INS PECTION FORM
H ev i ew Routing Forrn (.;)Pr irnary Rout inq ~.oo t ;"g
.I 6'.-/J.,1 ~C'A+ddH1v r ~
Date Referred Appl icant
I I t,I
Permit No.
Pf enrii uq Commission File No._
Review and return to the County Building Official with in 6 working days
Pl annin g:C om pli es w ith:
Subdivision R e gul at ions
Zoning Regul ations
S ite Plan (L andsc aping)
Y es N o Rev i ewed by:Date:------------~8IKl0 //)-/1-7f!
VJ 0 -~d/./I!....J Recommend App roval:C~A/1/(AVz;.n~~d /"
Oornrnents :CECt:-7?77)8UILO/,(J(r fJFRHlr '#-/{)/'L Ewe C/
Si re paw j r;EUafil Bf/J/{)I1)h PU1.v P!(?/"!#?H/JA/IX ("tJ!'UJbZ S
County Engineer:Roads
Grading
D rainage
DODOo0o0 Re commend Approva l:_
Comments:-------
D0 l/a-J.tJill We.s:r-
B O Uf,"US.D
D IIf..q /0,19·78
D?J D Reco mmend A pprov a l:~thtM.!~)
Comments:----------------------=----------
County Health:Water
Sanitation
Perc .test
Final Inspection:C/O
Recommend Approval
Comme nts:
DO
Final Inspect ion:L and s caping
R ecommend A ppro val 0D
Comments:------------,-------------------
by _C/O I ssued
FinalF i li ng Date._
D ate._
-It I/~I
REGUEST
EAGLE COUNTY
et"r"?~
•BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE:328-6339
DATE 1-,&.JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED AMPM CALLER ----.,-F=-'--->--==-=:...1,;""-=-=-"="------------
PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
ROUGH VENTrLATION TEMPORARY
STANDPIPE
woe S
FINAL OODS
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
COVER
PARTIAL
FOUNDATION
FRAMING
BUILDING
,LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
THUR 5"AMPMFRI/:/1
I '.
.,(.-r~tC
I
READY FORINSPECTION
(MO"N)TUE WED
COMMENTS:;re;/npb..-J
IT!APPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
[I]UPON THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS :
CORRECTIONS &ij t ie .t7tf'«/64£
DATE /-7-1'-/r
INSPECTOR
EAGLE COUNTY
-BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE:328 -6339
INSPECTI N
-d /It./
REGUEST
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED AMPM CALLER ~---''--_''---'''---'--_
BUILDING COVER PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
FOOTING ROUGH VENTrLATION TEMPORARY
FOUNDATION STANDPIPE
woes
FRAMING FINAL
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
,LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAl.LOCATION _
READY FORINSPECTION
MON TUE WED THUR FRI AMPM
COMMENTS:-"-_
o APPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS :
CORRECTIONS
DATE
/
INSPECTOR
PARTIAL
ELECTRICAL
TEMPORARY
LOCATION :
-PI/!,/
REGUEST
PARTIAL
VENTtlATION
LOCATION:
INSPECTIL
PARTIAL
PLUMBING
STANDPIPE
woes
FINAL
LOCATION :
•
COVER
PARTIAL
BUILDING
BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE :328-6339 E A GLE CO U N TY .
DATE ;J-~?-7f JOBNAME ~Z:f:-:~.d£
TIME RECEIVED AMPM CALLER .,..~......,..,7 /
Y-~~I
,LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
-'A"~12'~_
MON
COMMENTS :
0~
(;'L-?o
:/
READY FORINSPECTION
WED THUR
/I (7
FRI /~t:J
I AMPM
0 ~A PP R OV E D o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS :
CORRECTIONS
DATE :2 -/J ~-zt;;t(
INSPECTOR ~~
EAGLE COUNTY
BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE :328 -6339
•INSPECTI
-I
REGUEST
/
BUILDING COVER PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
ROUGH VENTILATION
STANDPIPE HEATING
woes
FRAMING FINAL HOODS
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
LOCATION:LOCATION :LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
READY FORINSPECTION
I
MON TUE WED THUR
COMMENTS :--:~-------------------
o APPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS----------------------------------
DATE
::;;'
INSPECTOR
..,L
/I /
REGUEST
EAGLE COUNTY
~~.t "~.-'1 ..J-~
II I ~-d
INSPECTI "NBUILDINGDIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE:328-6339
DATE ?/o?//7 7 JOB NAME d =__.,-/I
TIME REtEIVED/AMPM CALLER --->~==-,-"p7'---""-'--------.r;1,--
U
PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
ROUGH VENTrLATION TEMPORARY
STANDPIPE
woes
FINAL
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
PARTIAL
COVER
LOCATION ,
PARTIAL
FOOTING
FOUNDATION
FRAMING
BUILDING
,LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL.LOCATION _
I1J~OV E D o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS :
CORRECTIONS--------------------------------
INSPECTOR
REGUEST
I
EAG LE COUNTY
INSPECTI,BUILDING DIVISION
P.O.BOX179
PHONE:328-6339
,/
DATE JOB NAME _,/--::_
TIME RECEIVED AMPM CALLER """'""-_
f
PARTIAL
ELECTRICAL
TEMPORARYVENTrLATION
PARTIAL
MECHANICAL
PARTIAL
PLUMBING
ROUGH
STANDPIPE
woes
FINAL
PARTIAL
COVER
PARTIAL
BUILDING
FOUNDATION
FRAMING
,LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:LOCATION:
o OTHER 0 PARTIAL LOCATION _
.-»:
J
FRI
READY FORINSPECTION
}
WED THUR
/'
TUEMON
COMMENTS:--------"-'---:------=....:...;..-.::...-"--'---:---'---=-"-~---'-"'----'-----7--:-=---..,.....:_-----
o APPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT
o UPONTHE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS :
CORRECTIONS---------------......,.-----------------
DATE ,
INSPECTOR ,/