HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 5 LIONSHEAD CENTER 1 OF 2 - 1 LEGALetzlenPierceBriner
C HITECTURE PLA NNIN G IN TER IORS
I.,
....
LIO(\~SHEAD 'CENTRE PROPOSED'RESIDENTIAL'EXPANSION
•TrZati
VC{IL.
Q ~'S
l,.,IO Itfa.D
PfL.1 N6 I
D epartment of Community Development
75SouthFronta ge R oad
Va il,Colora do 81657
9 70-479-2138
FAX9 70-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
Andrew James Abraham
P.O.Box4326
Edwards ,CO81632
Re:520E .Uonshead Circle -Unit Consolidation
DearMr.Abraham,
May26 ,2004
Inresponsetoyourinquiryregardingthecreationofoneunitby permanently combining alock-
offunitwiththeprimaryunit ,the proposed reconfiguration doesnotviolatetheintentionsofthe
Lionshead Redevelopment Master PlanortheTownCodeofVail.
Oneofthe Ground Rulesforthe Master Planning Processis,"Therewillbenonetlosstothe
Vail community of either locals'hous ing orparkingspaces(publicand private)nowexistingin
Lionshead "(page2-3).Becausethis proposal involvesthe conversion ofarentalunit toa
permanent residence ,the "locals'hous ing"isnotbeingreduced.Further,the Master Plan
Recommendations clarifiesthe ground ru le statement in4.9 .1,"NoNetLossofEmp loyee
Hous ing -Ground rule number fiveofthe master planstatesthatthereshallbenonetlossof
employee housing in Uonshead as redevelopment occurs .n
The Uonshead MixedUse1Distr ict (LMU-1Section12-7H12)doesnot calculate theunitastwo
separateunits .Therefore ,the proposed unit consolidation doesnot affect thedens ity ofthe
housingun its in Uonshead .
Ifyouhaveany further questions,pleasedonothesitatetocallmeat(970)479-2454.
Sincerely,
ChJJ-d~
Clare L.Sloan
Plann ing Intern
TownofVail
l"..RECYCLED PAPER."
NOTE -COpy OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT O N JOBS ITE
ATE A ugust 23,199 3~CONSTRUCTION PERMIT·"D 62 7 /~..".,'7 PER MIT NO.
town D 181 I TYPE OFCONSTRUCTION III III I V V,
departme nt o f commun ity development 2 OCCU PANCY GROUP ABE HI RM BUILDING
DIVISION I 2 2.3 4 z ELE CTRI CAL 6000.00
TO BE FILLEDOUT COMPLETELYPRIOR TOI SSUANCE OF PE~0;::
GENERALDESCRIPTION OFWORK :...PLUMBING
TYPE O FP ERM IT Install lighting &r eceptacle a s ::>
[)BUIL DING [)PLUMBIN G ~..J
required f or retail s ales
...MECHANI CALstore.>
GS ELECT RIC AL 0 FOU NDAT ION
[J M E CHA NIC AL 0
P ERM ITFE ES-C;?11 T1n~~"ha~..l M ~"TYPE GROUPG.R.F.A VALUATION
.LEG A L LOT ""--5 B LK ;-....-BUILDING PERMIT rDESC,F I,GNG Vail Lionshead 1 ~PLAN CHECK
J OBN AME :v a ~('~
~
1/ELE CTRICAL 108.00
O W N E R NAM E NEW ()ALTE RATION (v ~ADDITIONAL ()REPAIR ()PLUMBING 0-
Bg S Q lli ,-{}f-¥a..i.-±·._-~~MAIL ADDRESS Bo x 1028 DWELLI NG UN ITS __ACC OMMO DATION UNI TS __MECHANICAL
CITY Vail 81658 PH.REC REATION FEE l\\
HEIG HT IN FT --,"0 .FIRE PLACES --'~AR C HITECT FIRM INSULATION :TYPE THICKNESSR-VAL LUE DESIGN REV IEW BOARD ~~FLOOR CLEAN-UP DEPOSITMAILADDRESS ..:!.EX T.WALLS -.:~CITY PH.USETAX ...tROOF
FIRM --\...l
GE NERAL TYPE ELEC GAS
CO NTRACTOR TOWN OF VAILREG.NO.OF TOTAL PERMIT FEES IOR.OO
SO LAR WO OD
TELE.HEAT I-E,Enst_Glat z!e __8-20-93
-ELECTRI CAL
-.---DATE -----
FIRM Wh ite River Electric A DDITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED:BUILDINGOFFICIAL
145-E :!.~INITIAL
TOWN OFVAILREG.NO.1----.-------------
C O NT RACTOR STCUT ~ONIN G ADMINI STRA TOR DATE
949-1403 --f..-
T ELE.BLAST ING IzONING &BUILDIN G NOTES:
FIRM PARKING
PLUMBING TOWNOFVAILREG.NO.
C ONTRACTOR DEM O
TELE.
FIRM Ih ereby ackn owled ge that I have read t h is appl ication,filled out i n full the information r equ i re d,
M E CHANI CAL co mpleted an accurate p lot plan ,a nd s ta te that all th ei nfo rm ation provided as r equ ired is c o rre ct.I
C ONTR ACTOR
TOWN OFVAILREG.NO.ag reet o c om plyw ith the i n formation and plo t plan ,t o comply w i th a ll Town ord inances and s t ate
TELE.l aws ,andt o build thi s structure accordi ng t o the T own 's zo ninga nd subdivis ion codes,design
rev iew a pp roved ,Un iform Building C od ea nd 0Jr aznc s of~apPl ic able t'JJP\eto .
O THER FIRM '.~_A,A/\)
TOWN OF VAILREG.NO.S I ~A TUR E OFOWNERORCONTRACTORFORHIMSELF
C O N TRAC TOR T ELE.ANDTHEOWNER.
.00
.ocJ
----DATE
/0
S 850 03-
PERMIT FEES
PLUMBING
BUILDINGPERMIT
PLANCHECK
PERMIT NO.---'-~~..:..--+-__
MECHANICAL
CLEAN·UPDEPOSIT
RECREATION FEE
USETAX
ELECTRICAL
ONING &BUILDING NOTES :_
..------
k.u ~....:./-.~.-"'fl
VALUATION
IIIIII IV V
ABEH IRM
G.RF.A.
NOTE -COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
DATE
GROUPTYPE
1.TYPEOF CONSTRUCTION
2 .OCCUPANCYGROUP
I hereby acknowledge that Ihaveread this application,filled out in full the Information required,
completed an accurate plot plan,andstate that allthe information provided as required is correct.I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan.to comply with all Town ordinances and state
laws,andto build th is structure according tothe Town's zoning and subdivision codes.design
review approved.Un iform BUilding Code and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT TO:~---P\~~'::D .
~IG=N""A:-:T::-UC::R-:::E-O:-:F:-::O~W::-N:-:E-:::R-:O:-:R~7:C::±:-:::=::-::=-==-==-=
ANDTHEOWNER.
DIVISION 122a34
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK::(hS,J.c..l,l /19 "h
<N--~"'''U<T'~t...L..J (4)c e.t .....,,......c
PARKING
aLASTING
ADDITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED :
Y !!
DEMO
DWELLING UNITS__ACCOMMOoAT IONUNlTs __
HEIGHTINFT.__NO.FIREPLACES
INSULATION:TYPE THICKNESS R-VALLUE
FLOOR
EXT WALLS
ROOF
TYPE ELEC.GAS
OF
HEAT SOLAR WOOD
ST.CUT
NEW ()ALTERATION ()ADDITIONAL ()REPAIR ()
PH.
tJ /A,
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
CITY v'o.ll.-C..:>PH.
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY
FIRM W>J IrE--p,.:"e...e..~~L.
LECTRICAL d r=ES.
NTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG .NO .I .I:-==--_
TELE .9~-I'+o~
LEGAL LOT 5 BLK,_..::.."l.-t
DESC.FILING V~(..i CrtiA.2.<L.J ~r
JOB NAME :V~"L -1-Sh,rt..Co .
ARCHITECT
OWNER NAME So-1 ....II ,<>VcM-L
MAIL ADDRESS Po)C.J0 2.-5
TELE.
CONTRACTOR TELE .
TOWNOFVAILREG .NO .
OTHER FIRM-----------
FIRM IJ If.
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG .NO .
TELE .
TYPE OF PERMIT
o JWILDING 0 PLUMBING
!B"ELECTRICAL 0 FOUNDATION
n MECHANICAL .0ADDRESs:52.0 Dc......s-az-«:f'"ho..-U-
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG .NO.
TELE .
GENERAL FuIDJRMIIL-~..:.....L-:"';''--_
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAIL 'REG .NO .
TOBEFILLEDOUT COMPLETELY PRIORTO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
•
r
75 south frontage road
vall.colorado 81657
~O~479-2138 or 479-2~39....officeof community development
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval,
Engineer"s (Pub1 ic Works)review and approval,a Planning Department
review or Health Departmentrev iew,anda review by the Building
Department,the estimated time for a total review may take aslong
as three weeRs.
Allcommercial (large or small)and all multi-family pennits will
have to follow the abovementioned maximum requirements.Residential
andsmall projects should take a lesser amount of time.However,if
residential or small er projects impact the various abovementioned
departments wi th regard to necessary review,these projects may
also take the three week period.
Every attempt wi.11 be made by this department to expedite this
permtt assoonaspossib1 e.
I.the undersigned,understand the plan check procedure andtime
frame .
v'~-r $h;.....L c...o -L.·L.......S.~-<>-..Cl-~~
Project Name
'0 J 1'1 I 93
Da te Wo rkShe-e"':t-=w-a-s---:;:t::-:u-:::r=-ne::-:d:;-::i'":n:-':t-;;"o-t~h;;-;e~-
Community Development Department.
••
••
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)479-2138 or 479-2139 office of community development
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTEREDWITHTHE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16,1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING &MATERIAL STORAGE
In summary,Ordinance No.6 states that it is unlawful for any
person to litter,track or deposit any soil,rock,sand,debris
or material,including trash dumpsters,portable toilets and
workmen vehicles upon any street,sidewalk,alley or pUblic
place or any portion thereof.The right-of-way on all Town of
Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft.off pavement.
This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail
Public Works Department.Persons found violating this ordinance
will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material.
In the event the person so notified does not comply with the
notice within the 24 hour time specified,the Public Works
Department will remove said material at the expense of person
notified.The provisions of this ordinance shall not be
applicable to construction,maintenance or repair projects of
any street or alley or any utilities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No.6 in full,please stop by the Town of
Vail Building Department to obtain a copy.Thank you for your
cooperation on this matter.
Read ~nd aCknowl~:
~'-'-"~--:D .~--
Position/Relationship to Project (i .e.contractor,owner)
6 1~L...e.,_3>_
'='D-a-:-t-e--'
••
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE 10 /1 2/q~JOB NAMEf ---'-'--=--~~-"":"'------'::::;""'~=-:::-;=-L-.-,----">"'-?-----,--,----
READYFOR
LOCATION:__+-_L-_--'--'----:-+-:r::::....----"---=:..::.-c:'-'=--="--'-__..L.:.--'-=~=__
BUILDING:
o FOOT INGS /STEEL
o FOUNDAT ION /STEEL _
o FRAMING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ---------
o INSULATION
I ~H E ETR O C K NAIL _
,/1'0 _
o FINAL
PLUMBING:
o UNDERGROUND
o ROUGH /DW.V._
o ROUGH /WATER _
o GAS PIPING _
o POOL /H.TUB _
0 _
o
o FINAL
ElECTRICAL:
o TEMP.POWER _
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT
0 _
o fiNALr'A /\
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING _
o EXHAUST HOODS _
o SUPPLY AIR _
0 _
o FINAL
I!J{~~R O V E D
CORRECTIONS:
o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE If)-!f...(-93
DATE ----''-------+---l-_+-....:......'''-JOB NAME ---I:7'-'~----'-------=--,.......,..----'-----r-"'=;"'---=.e::.---;-;-----:....--
READYFOR
LOCATION :.--------J----:"O'-=--~"'_'___f__7'_:::_'''-'-'"'-'-='P_'_''-'-'---<.-<'-'-----l.....-''.I------------
•\
BUILDING:
o FOOTINGS /STEEL
o FOUNDATION /STEEL
I'd'FRAMING r!T/l A/(?i'U(i&!rJ;,e u --1'1':/ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ----------
o INSULATION
o SHEETROCK NAIL _
0 _
o FINAL
PLUMBING :
o UNDERGROUND
o ROUGH /DW.V._
o ROUGH /WATER _
o GAS PIPING
o POOL /H .TUB _
0 _
o
o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
o TEMP .POWER _
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT
0 _
o FI NAL _
MECHAN ICAL:
o H EATING _
o EXHAUS TH OODS
o SUPPLY A IR
0 _
o FI NAL _
O-¥PR'OVED
~6 RR E CT I O N S :
o DISAPPROVED o RE INSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTORtJ-13 -q3
iDATE-1'-"----'---'''---'-='-------
,.
•..\•INSPECTION REQUEST.
r TOWN OF VAIL
/(~~..,»(2/(~_<J
CALLER ,;?4;K/7~~~1-5/1"r~
INSP ECTIO N:MON (r U ES)WEDTHURFRI C-'>,AM PM
c;//('1 _Y t;/;/~y ///a /..-J
READYFOR
LOCATION :
..
PERM IT NUMBER OF PROJEC T
-DA TE /.:<~3 /1/.3 JOB NAME ------=-7...:-=--:...:::.:.~--r:::::__-..:...-~:::....::::---=_----
PLUMBING :
o U NDERGROUND
o ROUGH /D W .V .
o ROUGH /WATER
o GAS PIPING
o POOL /H.TUB
,0
0
o FINAL .
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING
o EXHAUST HOODS
o SUPPLY AIR
0
o FINAL
o f--'----------------
'Q1 INAL (7o
BUILDING :
o FOO T INGS /STEEL
o FOUNDATION /STEE L
o FRAMING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING -----.,.-------
o INSULATION
o SHEETROCK NAIL _~_
I 'ELECTRICAL:
o T EMP.POWER _
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT
0 _
o FINAL
O/jP.PROVEDt~O RRE C T I O N S :
1"1 J /..,'I)I'f../
b /"I
o DISAPPROVED
:7,-4..ftc T G '.
I
o RE INSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE -,/,---2_/_(.,--/'_---'-9'_3"'--_INSPECTOR
NOTE -COpy OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
Au gust 1 2,1993
DATE
\J
6252PERMITNO.
1.TY PE OF CO NSTRUC TION I IIIIIIVV
2 OCC UPANCY GROUP ABEHIR M BUILDING 1)000.00
DIVIS ION 1 2 2a3 4 z ELEC TRI CAL 17 000.000
GENER AL OESC RIPTI ONOFWORK :~PLUMB ING 000.00
Tenant Fin ish
::>
...J«>MECHA NICA L
TYPE GROU P G.RFA VA LUAT ION PERMIT FEES
II FR B-2 BU ILO ING PERM IT lR<;nn
PLAN CHEC K '"''""
EL EC TRIC AL 126.00
NEW ()ALTERATION (~<:ADDIT IONA L ()REP AIR ()PL UMBING 15.00/PC 4.00 11 4 334
DWE LLING UNITS __ACCO MMODATI ONUN IT S __ME CHANI CAL ~HE IGHTINFT ___NO.FIREPLAC ES --REC RE ATION FEE
INSULATION:TYPE TH ICKNESS R-VA LLUE DE SIGN REVIE W BOAR D 50.00 -~<-<\
"0'"~
I [CLEAN ·UP DEPOSIT 100.00 ~~~-::USE TAXEXT.WAL LS
~~ROOF
01 4133'>,'1;'"",.1 <:IH/('7<;nn
TYP E ELE C.GAS
OF TOTALPERMITFEES f,7<;.nn
SOL AR WOODHEAT Dan Stanek 8-11-93
ADD ITIONALPERM ITS NE EDE D:BUILD ING OFFICIA L ------DArE -----
1:-.!'!.INIT IAL f-AM~nudtsen____8-03-9 L _---ST .CUT t<ONIN G ADM INISTR AT OR DAT E
BLAS TING IzONIN G &BUILDING NOTES :
PARK ING
DEM O
Ihe reby acknowledge that Ihave readt his application ,fille d out i n full the i nformation required ,
com pleted an accu rate plot plan ,and state that all the i nformation provided as required i s correct.I
ag reet o comply w iththe info rmationa nd plot plan ,to comply w ith all Town ord inan cesand state
laws,a nd t o bu ild t hisstructurea ccording t ot he T own'szon ing and subdivisio n codes ,d es ign
rev iew a pproved ,U niform Buil ding Code and othe r ordinances of theT own applicabl eth e reto .
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT TO:\~"\\\:L~"tO M t C{;f\\J ~l-P,l"..D ~
~(;)<.3,'=>?<i.'"0'-:,"T 5 SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTORFOR MSELF
AND THE OWNER .
p.,.,'--"-..Q)
CONSTRUCTION PERM IT,
TO BEFILLED OU T CO MPL ETELYPRIORTO ISSUAN CE OFlPRM
TYPEOFPERM IT
IX .BU ILDING [JC PLU MBING
IX]ELECTR ICAL 0 F O U N DATl O ~1::i
[J'i 7~E C H AN I C A L n -.!..~'"T .~",1 -('~
LEG AL ItOT 5 B LK 1 .............
I\tuNG
,
DESC .Va;l LiotliOhe ad 1
JO BN AME :Cleaver's Deli --/
OWNER NAME Tom Cleayeland --
MA IL ADDRESS Bo x 2675
CITY Vail 81658 PH .949-1048
ARCHITECT FIRM
MAI L ADD RESS
CITY PH .
GENE RAL FIR M Timber Wolf
CO NTRACTOR TOWN OF VAIL REG .NO.1 93-B
TELE .4 7 6-3154
FIRMWhi te River Electric
ELECTRICAL 145-E
CONTRACTOR TOWN OF VAIL REG .NO.
TELE a I,a_I I.f..,,,
FIRM Concept Mechanical
PLUMBING 189-P
CONTRACTOR
TOWN OF VAIL REG.NO.
TELE.a')I';_')I';a "
FIRM
M ECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR TOWN OF VAILREG.NO.
TEL E
OTH ER FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG .NO.
CO NTRACTOR TELE .
Ph .0,It,,,,--\()\..\j,
PE RNIT
Legal Description:Lot S
TOWN OFVAIL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
DATE:_~lWfj I-tt U G 5 1993
)(
APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED
******************************PERMIT INFORMATION *****************************
~l
[~-Building [J-Plumbing [-El ~ctrical [J-Mechanical [)-Other ----
.Job Name:t l't:f\\)t~).s tJ1)/)Job Address:r;"C-\)t .1 )V'\S \\t f4Y)C-)~f
\•c ,I I 'dr<~'....tL./.F n ...'1.
Block Filing SUBDIV ISION :
Owners Name ~C'(\\:;IJ:-f.\\)t.Lp..~Address:~.O-~c:sx."G b3-'S,\J\':>...'t L.
~\t:)\~\-\-\\LGeneralDescription:
___---,-Ph ._Address:------------Architect:
,,'
Work Class:[~-New [)-Altera~ion [)-Additional [)-Repair [)-other _
Number of Dwelling units:Number of Accommodation units:
~mber and Type of Fireplaces:Gas Appliances__Gas Logs__Wood/Pellet
~**********~**********************VALUATIONS *********************************
BUILDING:$I.o ~<:l o<l ELECTRICAL:$700<:1---OTHER:$.
PLUMBING:$/o ,()()MECHANICAL:$TOTAL:$~-'---'-~""'-"O:=""-----X '~~
*******************~**~~**~PONT~r.~O~INFORMATION **************************~
eneral Contractor:,T/''C &e:..t<"'~u ..:c£y Town of Vail Reg.NO.I tt3 -../5
Address:--.~-_'?hone Number::..._L/.7 t2 3 /S"t.j
Electrical Contra-..toi.:iv!tlk .?/./,...-P r /P ////,r Town of Vail Reg.3.0d ~--G
Address:Phone Number:':tt..e-l/4/0 '3.
Plumbing Contractor:/"<"cVr~ffrL/C-Y .f/.
Address:)
Town of Vail Reg.NO ./31 -P
Phone Number :9 ~(p -21/f)3
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:
Town of Vail Reg.NO._
Phone Number:
FOR OFFICE USE *******************************
BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE:(do._-
PLUMBING PLAN CHECK FEE:~
MECHANICAL PLAN CHECK FEE:
/o?4?-RECREATION FEE:
/6·00 CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
z')jK¥~SV-T O T AL PERMIT FEES:
BUILDING:~~SIGNATURE:;t
ZONING :AtiI'T"1 ~'-:--:.,f-,7o/-r i7!J-;-~-;/-~+-H----T.~
SIGNATURE:l
TYPE GROUP SQ.FT.VALUATIONa:FJf.B -.:L.
*************************2******
BUILDINGPERMIT FEE:£~-
PLUMBING PERMIT FEE:~
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE:
ELECTRICAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE #O ~FE ~~~f~DRB FEE:-=T1t 01
conpnent.s :_
~"~,~<:)x..'2..1v"':tS
\j f\\L e~·~\6S<O
75 south frontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)479-2138 or 479-2139
rltlJ iJ Au J 1993
office of community development
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTEREDWITHTHE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16,1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING &MATERIAL STORAGE
In summary,Ordinance No.6 states that it is unlawful for any
person to litter,track or deposit any soil,rock,sand,debris
or material,including trash dumpsters,portable toilets and
workmen vehicles upon any street,sidewalk,alley or pUblic
place or any portion thereof.The right-of-way on all Town of
Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft.off pavement.
This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail
Public Works Department.Persons found violating this ordinance
will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material.
In the event the person so notified does not comply with the
notice within the 24 hour time specified,the Public Works
Department will remove said material at the expense of person
notified.The provisions of this ordinance shall not be
applicable to construction,maintenance or repair projects of
any street or alley or any utilities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No.6 in full,please stop by the Town of
Vail Building Department to obtain a copy.Thank you for your
cooperation on this matter.
by:
to Project (i.e.contractor,owner)
•
75 south frontage road
vall,colorado 81657
(303)479-2138 or 479-2139
REG'll AUG 5 1')93
officeofcommunitydevelopment
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this permit requires a Town ofVail Fire Department Approval,
Engineer"s (public Works)review and approval,aPlanning Department
revieworHealth Department review,and areview by theBuilding
Department,the estimated timefora total review may takeaslong
as three weeks.
All commerci"al (large orsmall)and all mul ti-family permitswill
have tofollowthe above mentioned maximum requirements.Residential
and small projects shouldtakea lesser amount oftime.However,if
res tdent talorsmaller projects impactthe various above mentioned
departmentswithregardtonecessaryreview,these projects may
a1sota ke the three week period.
Every ·attempt willbe made by this departmentto expedite this
pCI'mH as.soonas possible.
I,the undersigned,understandtheplancheckprocedure and time
frame ..
)t ~lE[)..'JCR'~~tC\
Project Name
'!-Date Work
Community
Sheet was turned into the
Development Department.
•
---._\
L "J
\
\!-,
•
\
I
I,
I
I rv'
!
-_.-¥
---J!
i)-
>:Lf{~/7 9 ~/-]1 --'7{}{f0F
~-r7ZL/7(7/7-::;>I'iPt:!(72-7#/iiQilttJ7d
Iown 01 Vd ll Community
De veloomen t
Plan ---
xno rove o ---D --
Denied
He alth
0-
Fi re
~,-,
.------...."_.-.-..-..__.
r--.i--t..-:------1--->----
f''C\,I \
'/<:»
---.
~..-
","'
-;:-.:...~-;~
~.v _...:>
-''''-.....\-:-~
I"-{
'"..-.......:1 ..
"-(1 -:J......-:»-,
.f-.l'....'V ='J_
.'.,'.'!..
lOt ~,\.'!,:'::J i',\i I ;".
--I
J
i
._----
r-.:,
~
-'
C..,
~,..,
J
./
//'y'>/~
IV /(:,::~
'-:'r--
-=::-.
I
I
I
,/-'----;--;--------.
."
I
I,"..-e .,
I
-------J
.-..
.-
/
/.J'---'
/
/
.,/
>
TO .,/LVj--\I
r
8 Y ~~_____..~.£...__._,...._........DATE.££<'f:.
•
-J '···f !\,,........f'I 1'.\'"IiI\J j \-I :'.J--'--..I...'-..,,_
-.~:'l "~1,.r~•r ·o,/,-~~.,..,..:;0::
~t·"j ,.,1 '~-:'-:,...V r'.a;,iJ C ',.,.t;q~-.:...;1 .J
/
.,.
•
'\"\f ~)(
,Y<t .~l.!:R IY\
c.'J1 i-
J -
.;
•
-I ·'\'.\t ~
..i \l;\'=.J "-~:f"I t'"I 'I
....;;...I...._....._L
"r -,~~..
~.~.>••
,,",;'-;,j ..:j .'
~.~..;,"c-:r.-
s,''J'(
'£37;'3 3 1 ,0 '7""!7 7/'8 I
I
•
-I '',~,!'\
,\1 J
R'''''~~~,P '1 ~i OJ,,,-~,'
•"
,~-,\'
...-..:1.,-~;o,"/}r ,-
U;!,..;.~'~<,~.....
,..1 ';......~-
e
CJ:>o -
\
__,.1
ZT7,,::r:u "0'7 "'J7'rF A8
_s r>!'.I ii •:.I'I.'"•.~1 \.---:l I."p'--
I .~"t·~~...~-
_i.";;_l :.."./-...cr '~__"-_~-C.,,~
I J
I
..J-'
f
CL£~J £~GE..L
-=}1 \0 /1
Plan Review Based on
the 1991 Uniform Codes
NAME:CLEAVERSDELI
ADDRESS:520LIONSHEAD
VAIL,COLORADO
OCCUPANCY :B-2
TYPEOF CONSTRUCTION:IlFR
DATE:8-11-93
CONTRACTOR:TIMBERLINE
ARCHITECT:NONE
ENGINEER:NONE
PLANS EXAMINER :DANSTANEK
CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
The items listed below are not intended to bea complete listing of all possible code
requirements inthe adopted codes.It isa guide to selected sections of the codes.
Thefollowingis not to be construed to bean approval of any violation of any of
the provisions of the adopted codes or any ordinance ofthe Town of Vail.
1.FIREALARMPLANSNEEDTOBE SUBMITfED AND APPROVED BYVAILFIRE
DEPARTMENT BEFOREATCOWILLBEISSUED .
2.HEALTHOFFICERWITHTHETOWNOFVAILAPPROVALREQUIRED BEFORE A
TCOWILLBEISSUED.
3.ALLPENETRATIONSIN FLOOR,CEILING,ANDWALLSTOBEFILLEDWITHAN
APPROVEDFIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL.
•
READ Y FORINSPECT ION :
LOCATION :r--;?f)
.-
MO N
?J.
PM
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
o FOO TIN GS /ST EEL o UN DERG ROUND
o FOUNDAT ION /STEEL o ROUGH /D W .V.
o FRAM ING o ROUG H /W ATER
R OOF &SHEE R o GAS P IPINGoPLYWOODNAILING
o INSULATION o POOL /H .TUB
o SHEETROCK NAIL 0
0 0
o FINAL o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
o TEMP.POWER o H EATING
o ROUGH o EXHAUST HOODS
o CONDUI T o SUPPLY AIR
0 0
~I N A L o FINAL
"..,
Iq /APPROVED z!-5/o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
I CORRECTIONS:
DA T E ---=~_--''-L..'--.....L......I.-C _INSPECTOR
l/
'"~SH OP
DA TE
e
INSPECTION REQUES"T.
TOWN OF VAILrUnInJ)r-~(\i
CAL LER 1(--,.,J C))t \f0 \0 v---x-I
NA ME ---'"-,,-.!...-"..l..--l...:..L.:~-_~.L...,..;~+-..l-_
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
1C 1 14 Je:0 JOB
FR I AMPM J
(l~rTHUR
r~READ YFORINSPECTION :
l,--S JCLOCATION:__-,,-,~-=-__=--,--_---=:....=..c'---'-"-...L-'-'--'---'-''--'-",----'''----'''-,",--__----_
.
BUILDING:
o FOO TINGS /STEEL
o FOUNDAT ION /STEEL _
o FRA MING
ROO F &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ---------
o INSULATION
o SHEETROCK NAIL _
0 ----==,,----_
¥FINAL -EO
PLUMBING:
o U NDERGROUND _
o ROUGH /DW.V._
o ROUGH /WATER _
o GAS PIPING
o POOL /H .TUB _
0 _
o
o FINAL
~.
ELECTRICAL:
o TEMP .POWER _
I
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT _
0 _
o FINAL _
,I
MECHANICAL:
o HEA TING _
o EXHAUST HOODS ~__
o SUPPLY AIR _
0 _
o FINAL _
o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
-------------------------------'1 II!'
DATE /tJ~/f-93
/
INSPECTOR
PERM IT NUMBER OF PROJECT
•INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OFVA IL
~~"1//eK..5 $.,L /,,
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION :MONTUESWED
LOCATION ://~7 /-/'C>t:;;/p.#/L
~FRI _____AM PM _
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
o FOOTI NGS /STEEL o UNDERGROUND
o FOU NDATION /STEEL o RO UGH /D W.V .
o FRA MING o RO UGH /W ATER
ROOF &SHEER o GAS PIPINGoPLYWOODNAILING
o INSULATION o POOL /H .TUB
o SHEETROCK NAIL 0
0 0
I.&:FINAL o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
o TEMP .POWER o HEA TING
o ROUGH o EXHAUST HOODS
o CONDUIT o SUPPLY AIR •
0 0
I#FINAL o FINAL
;lfp,ROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
RRECTIONS :
DATE ---'----'::....:::..._~_INSPECTOR
~Sl-!OP
I hereby acknowledge that Ihavereadth is application,filled out i n full the i nformation required,
completed an accurate plot plan ,andstate that al l the information provided asrequ ired is correct.I
agreeto comply with the information and plot plan ,to comply with all Town ordinances andstate
laws ,andto build th is structure according to t he;j TOWJl1;zon::JJingandS,UbdiV i sion codes,design
review approved ,Uniform Build ing Code and other or i~nces ofthwn applicable thereto .
CLEAN UP DE POSIT TO :(~
--fZ.o ~;;;e-';-.V)A -S-IG£.N~A..LTLU":"R":"E":'O"':F~O:::::W"':N+-"IR-O-R-C-O-N-T-RA-C-T-O-R-F-O-R-H-I-M-SE-L-F
J.f..r.,\.i."I....Jh....-CiLJ1(1'•I KO..ANDTHEOWNER .
P DWELLING UNITS__ACCOMMODATIONUNITS __
NEW ()ALTERATION (XXXADDITIONAL ()REPAIR ()
---DATE
<II 623 9PERMITNO.
BUILDING 4000.00
z ELECTRICAL 1000.000
i=«PLUMBING 2000.00:::>
...J«MECHANICAL>
.",(\(\(\(\
PERMIT FEES
BUI LDING PERMIT 115.00
PLAN CHECK 75 .00
ELECTRICAL 50 .00
PLUMBING 30 .00/PC 8 .00 #L 1334
MECHANICAL
f-------
ONINGADMINISTRATOR
1z0NING &BUILDING NOTES:_
I-D.i!!!-S tanels:._8=.9=9:L _
BUILD ING OFFICIAL DATE
INITIAL
--RECREATION FEE
R-VALLUE DESIGN REVIEWBOARD
CLEAN·UP DEPOSIT Jn n nn ~~~.§USETA X '1-_
11"",1 "ur Pl"n ('IF 7<'.00 -fS"
:;"'!
TOTAL PERMIT FEES l..~1 nn 1->
VALUATION
GAS
WOOD
IIIIII I VV
ABE H IR M
1 2 2.34
G.R.FA
NOTE -COPY OF PERMIT TO B E KEPT ON JOBSITE
DATE /l'lgulOt 10,1993
T YPE
__NO.FIREPLACES
SOLAR
ELEC.-I
GROUPTYPE
I .TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
2 OCCU PANCYGROUP
DIVISION
II 1hr B
GENERAL DESCRI PTIONO FWORK:_
Interior alteration.
DEMO
PARKING
BLASTING
ST CUT
ROOF
A DDITI O NAL PERMITS NEEDED:
i.
T YPE
O F
HEAT
HEIG'"iT INFT
EXT.WALLS
FLOOR
I NSULA T I O N :
ts P L UMBING
C F OUNDATI ON
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
[!i B UILDING
[!J E L ECTR ICAL
T O B E FILLED OU T CO M PLETEL Y PRIO R T OI SSUANC E OFPERM IT
TY PE OF PERMI T
LJ M EC HAN I CAL 0 J:;-~?n .;,,",,1,,,,,,1 r.;
.EG A L LOT B LK -,r:v
ESC .FILI NG T;~.,,1 1 "..,0 IJ
J O B N AME :Sweet Life -.~0'::?)::~('.
O WNER NAME Gary NeaJ,'J --
MAIL ADDRESS 933Lyons Ridge Lo
CITY Vail 81657 PH.
A RC HITECT FI RM F ,P,B
MAILADDRESS
CITY PH.1'>-1'>142
G ENERAL FIRM GM Neal
C ONTRACTOR TOWNO F VAIL RE G .NO .1 J4 B
THE.4 76-8510
-H E C TRICAL
FIRM White River Electric
145-ETOWNOFVAILREG.NO .
C ONTRACTOR
TELE .949-1403
FIRM Concept Mechani cal
PLUMBING TOWNOF VAIL REG .NO .189-P
C ONTRACTOR
TELE 926-2693
FIRM
ME CHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
TOWNOFVAI L REG .NO .
TELE .
OTHER FIRM
T OWNOF VAIL REG .NO .
C ONTRACTOR TELE.
)
TOWN OFVAIL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT APPLICATION FO C ~
DATE:1hs:>"93 JUL 21
•I
1995
APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED)1(•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PERMIT INFORMATION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(~l-Building (~l-Plumbing [~l-Electrical (]-Mechanical (]-other __
JOD Name:<W&fTL a=e-.F,Yv'tll..Job Address:5:.2.Q L ~o"=Sha 0 .C/W c..
r-L;o .,-,s J....rZkIJ I s.,...F:{,y...~
Legal Description:Lot i:>Block I Filing SUBDIVISION:4
Owners Name:G ~tl 6e~~Address:9'33i..y,"-'Se1fJ f!L.ooe #15"'.1 Ph.Y'26 -'ii£¢
Architect:Fj2.;T2.bW Beq <;·e 3e.'I'Efl Address:/,xg 4 '.......Lrd-5 '*l<.'Cp
General Description:TI\tl?fP'""R .II l t €l2B:D·c ....,
.i
Work Class:(]-New (Xl-Alteration (]-Additional (]-Repair (]-other _
Number of Dwelling units:~Number of Accommodation units:-tr
*
mber and Type of Fireplaces:Gas Appliances ~Gas Logs~Wood/Pellet ~
*********************************VALUATIONS *********************************c ./
BUILDING:$~O ~J{cO ELECTRICAL:$~~0 0 r~OTHER:$
PLUMBING:$~jQtlO MECHANICAL:$--tT'TOTAL:$:5!ee ~c:)7ULQ -~***************************CONTRACTOR INFORMATION ***************************"~neral Contractor:C!nUl'AtJ:~r.Town of Vail R:-:No.3 i ~-.(J
Address:"3c>'t H4!y$ON _IV -.f{__Phone Number:~2 '-11 S-__
Electrical Contractor:W7&+f!~ce Efc:c..(r2..,'....Town of Vail Reg.NO.r59 ,CZ'
Address:331 !'1&-rc..lt IE .ON ,@ .ri/'~CJ Phone Number:9 1'1 -1 e,~;)
Plumbing Contractor:CONC£~l'1 e:~Town of Vail Reg.NO.\$",p
Address:PO .£Je w II I.L AV~,Gt>.~/'20 Phone Number:'1~~.:l ",cpi
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:
Town of Vail Reg.NO._
Phone Number:
OFFICE USE *******************************
BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE:~G:-
PLUMBING PLAN CHECK FEE:~-
MECHANICAL PLAN CHECK FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
FOR********************************/IS--BUILDINGPERMIT FEE:
PLUMBING PERMIT FEE:
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE:
ELECTRICAL FEE:
OTHER TYPEQFFEE ~('Mr#'_---';,..:;.:;.~__DRB FEE .ff <'Q LTn I k ;t
·01 Lj 133~
J Ylk
GROUP SQ.FT.VALUATION
f)
BUILDING:
SIGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
Comments:_
75 south frontage road
vail.colorado 81657
(303)479-21)8 or 479-2139 office of community development
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16,1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING &MATERIAL STORAGE
In summary,Ordinance No.6 states that it is unlawful for any
person to litter,track or deposit any soil,rock,sand,debris
or material,including trash dumpsters,portable toilets and
workmen vehicles upon any street,sidewalk,alley or pUblic
place or any portion thereof.The right-of-way on all Town of
Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft.off pavement.
This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail
Public Works Department.Persons found violating this ordinance
will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material.
In the event the person so notified does not comply with the
notice within the 24 hour time specified,the Public Works
Department will remove said material at the expense of person
notified.The provisions of this ordinance shall not be
applicable to construction,maintenance or repair projects of
any street or alley or any utilities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No.6 in full,please stop by the Town of
Vail Building Department to obtain a copy.Thank you for your
cooperation on this matter.
Read and acknowledged by:
)t ~1i1,/Jl"-0 I ~cJr£.~os~tion/Relationshipto Project (i.e~ntract~owner)
V 7&1-Y9?"Dat~
••
•
~.
•
75 south frontage road
vall.colorado 81657
~O~479-2138 or 479-2139 oUlce 0'community development
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If thts permtt requtres a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval,
Engineer"s (Public Works)review and approval,a Planning Department
review or Health Department review,anda review by the Building
Department,the estimated time for a total review may take aslong
as three weeks.
All commercial (large or small)and all multi-family permits will
haveto follow the abovementioned maximum requirements.Residential
andsmall projects should take a lesser amount of time .However,if
res identia 1 or smaller projects impact the various abovementioned
departments with regard to necessary review,these projects may
a 1so ta ke the three week period.
Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this
permit assoonas possibl e.
I,the undersigned,
frame .
"J!M!~,.Agreeto y.'
understand the plan check procedure andtime
)t SWee:r h'-Fe F/N;Sh
Project Name
'f.D !fft~1 heet was turned into the
Community Development Department.
••
Plan Review Based on
the 1991 Uniform Codes
NAME:SWEETLIFE REMODEL
ADDRESS :520E .LIONSHEAD
VAIL ,COLORADO
OCCUPANCY :B ,
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:11 lHR
DATE:8-9-93
CONTRACTOR:GM NEAL CONST
ARCHITECT:FRITZLEN ,PIERC E
ENGINEER:NONE
PLANS EXAMINER:DAN STANEK
CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
The items listed below are not intended tobea complete listing ofall possible code
requirements inthe adopted codes.It isa guide to selected sections of the codes.
Thefollowingis not to be construed tobean approval of any violation of any of
the provisions of the adopted codes or any ordinance of the Town of Vail.
1.BATHROOMS TO COMPLY WITHSEC.3105OF THE 1991UBC.
2 .LIGHT AND VENTILATION REQUIRED ASPER SEC.705OFTHE1991
UBC.
3 .FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE
STARTED.
4 .FIELD INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
••
®
®
SMOKEDE'TECTOR
ESL 425CT
HEATDETECTOR
CHEMETRONICS 601
TYPICAL
WIRING
PULLSTATION
•-~ND OFLINE
I,
'+
PULLSTATION
FIRELIGHTBG10
AUDIBLEDEVICE
WHEELOCK E-9025
~T O FROM FIRE ALARM PANEL-------VFAP
ENDOFLINE
--4lJ END OF LINE DEVICE
REMOTEANN.PANEL
SINGLESTATION
ESL 445CSH
AUDIBLE SIGNAL
WHEELOCK MIZHORN
REMOTEIND.LIGHT
one
I--~
line
The BeST electric
LOUI,S.flIomersheuser
P.o.Box 273 "Sunahlne "
Eagle.CO 81631 328-1610
•
""j'
"
'...
I
:./"X",:-,,..
,'"."."''
,',
"
r------
I
I
J
<>/
/
A I
&r.,!,.oj
liilt..
.1-'::.
.i,
I r.:.-==-:.=--=-=--.'.-_.-
I!O ,~l T ,
II (:~·ll"
I
!
1
I,-
t__i I ;-:::---
I
--_._-J I "•r ------.------------.L •"..-..-.-------J::-T '--·--..--~-.---.-
I
--iJ"'"Ike f'2rI~i~tJ ~J lf''''../jZ T?'F-.r ',g~T hf.i'.
r.t
I '.Yy.Sc:..o i.e
The BESTLouisSR Electric
IIlII 0 ""-.omershsuser
r ••vvX 273-..co 81831 "SUnshine"328-1610
,.
:=_-,
·Sunshlne"
320-1610
The BEST Electric
Louis S.Romersheuser
P.O.Box 273
Eagle,CO 81631
".--.-~-.-~--~'-+-
,,..,
i I""
i I .J
I
I
"/
,,',
'\'"--
!
!
-l
'\
I
i:
l,'..':.~--'-_._~.
.,,•
-,
.,'','
•
,,/
/r ../-,'.'/.__..~.:.
/
..
!
I
I
I
!
~".."
"
/
"
",/.
,.
..X ,
<,
".'.
,
",.t'.
....:~
/,.:
.><'-.
\...,/
f
.,
1
I
I
I-,
.:f'.
.""',
"".).~<'/",.
#'->.:
-./',-:'.
,,,/',":.",/.
/-,..'
""/.,"r-l /'·x"y"I i -~----~:..::.~-,-,--.
.",
"
'."
11
.i--
I
-;,:;.
£",.,I ~L..?C'
ct.~~&-';-"'.7-r
!
"
~HWUA j -
._,,'1.~1'1PL,..'f WIT1f L~-C:U U~G-"_,~~
--"~.M.h""""",,"'\"'O \?iCNO-~'~,l~·~~..Pc1-.)%.e..'OwoJ c.t!)~'.,.-.,
.:5 ..F1~~~~.(w:c .~e-t-VJ '
"f2:)ae H1 ..,)Dl~·~e;,$t,,\.£....
oJ /'\'J~/'
(
I
v~~.-lPI
I
I --..
~~-'.~
3"
""l~-10 ~T'Gt
4'"W~f'E ~~
....
._.COHCePl..H~NI~-.PJC.
,~.o.~-ic...\\~~.,A.VOf-J~c.ot..O~'€:>1,"W
~rt &y:1"".:(l....,:1IA~:~'e-I :)q~
___-'--L--.._.'.,
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
.)\;JU-t L .-k "T(om 1-+-~()b h
CALLER OC ve 5\d ,LI ('f)(l ot rTh(h l1oic.:•
]
W ED THUR ~e.J PM
r:d mt./l
RE ADYFORINS PECTION :
LOCATION :5 \ei +-I
PERMIT N UMB ER OFPRO JECT
BUI LDING:PLUMBING:
o FOOTINGS I ST EEL o UNDERGROUND
o FOUNDATION I STEEL ROUGH I D W .V.U ..~fi;(~·
o FR AMIN G 0 OU GH I W ATER ~7~'
ROOF &SHEER o G ASP IPINGoPLYWOODNAILING
o IN SULATION o POOL I H .TUB
•o SHEETROCK NAIL 0
0 0
o FINA L n F INAL
ELECTRICAL:~MECHANICAL:
L,Ij ~~P .P OWER n H EATING
~J ~U G H r To ooes <'",...
b d ONDUIT o SUPPLY A IR
0 0
o F INAL o FI NAL,
D'A'~R OV ED o D ISAPPROVED n REINSPECTION REQU IREDP-
ORR ECTIONS:
D ATE f~4?'-c;:3 INSPE CTOR -.,.b.='-'--"~~"'----'''===--------
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DA TE .I 0 J d ~J5J (3 JOB NAME ---t;~~V-=---1::Yf-Ut~--L:L,..l....----
READYFOR I NSPECTION:
,5dO
\~
BUILDING:
o FOOTINGS /STEEL
o FOUNDATION /STEE L
o FRAMING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ---------
o INSULATION --=_
o SHEETROCK NAIL _
o _
o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
o TEMP.POWER _
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT _'''-:-_
'\o _
o F INAL
~
PLUMBING:
o UNDERGROUND _
o ROUGH /DW.V._
o ROUG H /WATER _
o GAS PIPING _
o POOL /H .TUB _
o _
o
'VJ FINAL
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING _
o EXHAUST HOODS _
o SUPP LY A IR ---,_
o _
o F INAL _
~P R O V E D
CORRECTIONS:
o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECT ION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR -
PERMIT NUM BER OF PROJECT
I
{\~e
~Mf'.-~\&"-I N S PE C T I O N REQUEST
-S \...(_~_.---1 T O W I'l-"~1L
/>1 ~
__~__(_AM •P MFRI
CALLER _--'\---'(_-,--__---L~~_'______
MON TUES WEDTH 'URREADYFORINSPECTION:
/",I •LOCATION :-'-----'--_--'--'--=--_'_____----"--<-,--_
BUILDING:
o FOOTING S/STEEL
o FOUNDATION /STEEL
o FRAMING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAIL ING
o I NSULATION
o S HEETROCK NAIL _
o_'_
o FINAL
PLUMBING:
o UNDERGROUND
o ROUGH /DW,V._
o RO UGH /WATER _
o GAS PIPING
o POOL /H .TUB _
0 _
o
o FINAL
,o APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
I I
o DISAI"PROVED
/<
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING _
o EXHAUST HOODS
o SUPPLY AIR _
0 _
o FINAL _
o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
"-j •
f
IDATE _INSPECTOR
•
PERMIT NUMBER (!)F PROJECT
q /3
.I
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON/
LOCATION:S-dO C-/O
URFRI~
_____®PM
BUILDING:
o FOOTINGS /STEEL
o FOUNDATION /STEEL
o FRAMING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ---------
o INSULATION _
o SHEETROCK NAIL _
o
o F.!.!:ML
~ECT~AL 0
o TEMP.POWER _
~~U G H
o CONDUIT
o
o FINAL
PLUMBING:,
o UNDERGROUND -;....<:-<'---_
o ROUGH /DW.V._--------__
o ROUGH /WATER _
o GAS PIPING _
o POOL /H .TUB _
D ._
o
o FINAL
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING _
o EXHAUST HOODS
o SUPPLY AIR
0 _
o FINAL
I
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
o DISAPPROVED
J r /(cQ ~
o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE 1>7 "/,3 INSPECTOR
FRI
_l J +>:t (e')(p _CALLER
NAME ----='---=...:"---..:'7-~~=--_____,__-_:____r-------
LOCATION :_~~"--_=":'-'-'-'-'-"'-'--=>~-'--""::""'",,---,---'--I."-'-_
READYFOR INSPECTION :MON
~L:Of)
PERMIT NUMBE20F PROJECT
DATE q/8;q 3 JOB
BUILDING:
o FOOTINGS I STEEL
o FOUNDATION I STEEL
o FRAM ING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ---------
o I NSULATION,t SHEETROCK NAIL Yf~\~\\{\C{'.\
0 _
o FINAL
PLUMBING:
o UNDERGROUND
o ROUGH I DW.V._
o ROUG H I WATER _
o GAS PIPING _
o POOL I H.TUB _
0 _
o
o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
o TEMP.POWER _
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT _
0 _
o FINAL
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING _
o EXHAUST HOODS _
o SUPPLY AIR
0 _
o FINAL
•o APPROVED
CORRECTIONS :
o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE _L..---!-__------INSPECTOR
G.J-?l1 •INS:CTION REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER OF ROJECT I,./J /l-IJ-.'-/'_TOWN OF VAIL
DATE _(D ()q q ~JOB NAME .~f it!d
I CALLER (tV)},I !'~
~:z-=I f
READYFOR INSPECTION :.MON TUES WE~TH RFRI PM
LOCATION:e;;7-1 ~:;4i L I '('CI (lt1t..;!-;t.
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
o FOOTINGS I STEEL o U NDERGROUND
o FOUNDAT ION I STEEL o ROUGH /DW.V.
o FRAMING o ROUGH I WATER
ROOF &SHEER o GAS PIPINGoPLYWOODNAILING
o INSULATION o POOL /H .TUB
o SHEETROCK NAIL 0
0 0
c[FINAL o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
o TEMP.POWER o HEATING
o ROUGH o EXHAUST HOODS
o CONDUIT o SUPPLY AIR .
,
0 0
Cl ,IjIf'JAL o FINAL
fFPPROVED o DISAPPROVED o REINSPECTION REQUIRED
C RREC~IONS:,
(J f 0'1f e ,U £.A L_
DATE 1/-I 9 "3 INSPECTO R
~~S HO P
PM
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
\+()
/!\lAn \
LOCAT ION :__~"----'--__-"---"-'"--'--'-'--"":"---'--'---'-'-_
DATE
READ Y FOR INSPECTION :
~-=r
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
\0 I '"'51 CI2L JOBIJ
BUILDING:
o FOOTINGS /STEEL
o FOUNDATION /STEEL
o FRAM ING
ROOF &SHEERoPLYWOODNAILING ---------
o INSULATION
o SHEETROCK NAIL _
0 _
o FINAL
PLUMBING:
o U NDERGROUND _
o ROUGH /DW.V._
o ROUG H /WA TER _
o GAS PIPING
o POOL /H .TUB _
0 _
o
o FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
o TEMP .POWER _
o ROUGH
o CONDUIT
o _
9~FINAL
MECHANICAL:
o HEATING _
o EXHAUST HOODS _
o SUPP LY AIR _
0 _
o FINAL _
o REINSPECTION REQUIREDoDISAPPROVED/A P P R O V E D ~
CORRECTIONS :_
DATE ---":":-_~-=-_~'-'--_INSPECTOR
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
NOTE -COPY O FPE R MIT T OB E KEPT O N J O BS ITE
DATE Au gu s t 2 3 ,1993
J
P ER ,IIIT NO .
t TYPEOF CO NSTRUCTION I II III I VV
2 OCCUPANCY GROU P A B EH IR M BUILDING
DIVISION z ELE CTR ICAL 5000 .00122.3 4 0
GENERALDESCRIPTIONOF WOR K :~PLUMBING
Combine metering 2
::>
to TOV el petri eal -'«
serv ices .New meter behindV a il 2 1 >MECHANICAL
B ldg.Relocate p anels up plying ma ll I g h i ng .
TYPE GROUP G.RF A VALUATION PER MIT FEES
BUILDING PERM IT
PLAN CHECK
ELE CTRICAL Fees waive d
NEW ()ALTER ATI ON1nO ADDITIONAL ()REPAIR ()PLUMBING
DW F lU/'.IG U NI"':'"S __ACC OMMODATION UNITS __MECHANICAL
HEIGHTINFT --NO .FIREPL ACE S --RECREATION FEE
-INSULATION.TYP E THICKNESSR-VAL LUE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD--;]±-
FLOOR CLEAN·UP DEPOS IT
EXT.WA LLS USETAX
ROOF
I
TYPE ELE C GAS T OTALP ERMITFE ES ~ees waiv edOFSOLARWOODHEAT
E rnst Gla tzle _8 -10..::91
ADD IT IONALPERMITSNEEDED:n UILDING OFFICIAL --DATE -----
.r ~INITIAL
1---------------ST CUT I70NING ADMINISTRA TOR DATE
BLAS TING IzONIN G &BUILDINGNOTES:
PA RK ING
DEM O
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this a ppli cat ion,filled out in f ull the informa tion requ ired ,
c ompleted an accurate plot plan ,an ds tate that all the information p rov i ded a sre qu ired i s c o rrect.I
a gree to com ply w ith the information and plot plan ,to c omplyw ith a ll Town ordinances and state
laws ,and to bu i ld thi s structure a ccord i ng to t he ~~on~bl~sion codes,design
review approved ,Uniform Building Code and other n ces of n ~Ole...th to.
(y~
~N A T URE OFOWNER ORCONTRACTORFORHIMSELF
NO THE OWNER.
I'PLUMBING
C FOUND ATION
~ll
:J BUILDING
QS ELECTR ICALoMECHANICAL
520 Lio nshea d
TO BEFILLEDOUT COMPLETELY PRIORTO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMI T
LEG AL LOT 5 B LK 1
D ESC .F ILING Vail L ionshea d1 st
J OB N AME :Lions head Cent er -Ele ctr ical
O WNER NAME TOITH of Va-i-l-----
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
AR CHITECT FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
GENERAL FIRM
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG.NO.
TELE.
FIRM Wb jt e R iver E le ctr i c
EL ECTR ICAL
ONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAIL REG.NO.145 E
TELE.0 /,0_1 /,1'":1
FIRM
PL UMB ING TOWN OF VAIL REG.NO.
CONTRACTOR
TELE.
FIRM
ME CHANICAL
CONTR ACTOR
TOWNOFVAILREG.NO.
TELE.
OTH ER FIRM
TOWNOFVAILREG.NO.
CONTRACTOR TELE.
----DATE
-20 rIJ'.J
--t>A~-----
BUILDINGPERMIT
elECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL
CLEAN·UP DEPOSIT
MECHANICAL
PLANCHECK
RECREATION FEE
USETAX
PLUMBING
ZONING &BUILDING NOTES:_
VALUATION
ABEHIRM
G.RFAGROUPTYPE
2.OCCUPANCY GROUP
ADDITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED :
:!..!'!
HEIGHTIN FT .__NO.FIREPLACES
INSULATION :TYPE THICKNESS R·VALLUE
FLOOR
EXT WALLS
ROOF
TYPE ELEC .GAS
OF
HEAT SOLAR WOOD
BLASTING
ST.CUT
DEMO
PARKING
DWELLING UNITS__ACCOMMODATI ON UNITS __
NEW(I ALTERATION ()ADDITIONALl )REPAIR()
~NOTE -COpy OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE~).CONSTRUCTION PERMIT .DATE /
,:;PERMIT NO.!ffd1 .,,:::>-11111 QI I .TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IIIIII I VV I~~~~---------IIIdepartmentofcommunitydevelopment
OWNER ow,",oJ:V~
Box I CO
TELE.
LEGAL LOT !5 BLK_..:::1.1
DESC .FILING veu:..t U"~l ~.-
PLUMBING j
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG.NO .
TElE.
FIRM WIJ ITE.'R"v~~l.£.Lffl ·-
ELECTRICAL I '-!-5 e.
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG.NO
TElE.4 'f '1-I'+o~
TOBEFILLED OUTCOMPLETElYPRIORTO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
TYPE O F PERM IT
OJ3UILDING 0 PLUMBING
B'ELECTRICAL 0 FOUNDATION
n MECHANICAL n
ADDRESs:5 a-O Vo~<.:.'l;;;...<L-~
.,.ARCHITECT FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
GENERAL FIRM tJ/A
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG.NO.
FIRM
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR TOWNOFVAILREG .NO.
TElE.
OTHER FIRM1------------
TOWNOFVAILREG.NO .
CONTRACTOR TElE.
I hereby acknowledge that I have readth is application,filled out in full the Information required,
completed an accurate plot plan ,and state that allthe information provided as required Is correct.I
agreeto comply with the information and plot plan ,to comply with all Town ordinances and state
laws,and tobu ild this structure according tothe Town's zoning and subdivision codes,design
review approved,Uniform Building Code and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT TO:~~S~~~·~·~~:::D.~'~'~~~~~~H'i'i:.iiSELi'
IGNATURE OFOWNER0 ACTORFOR HIMSELF
ANDTHEOWNER.
,
75 louth frontageroad
vall,colorado81657
(303)479-2138 or 479-2~39....o"lce 0'community development
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If thts permtt requtres a Town ofVail Fire Department Approval,
Engineer"s (Publ ic Works)review and approval,aPlanning Department
revieworHealth Department review,and areview by theBuilding
Department,the estimated timefora total review may takeaslong
as three weeRs.
All commercial (large orsmall)and all multi-family permitswill
have tofollowthe above mentioned maximum requirements.Residential
and small projects shouldtakea lesser amount oftime.However,if
residential or smaller projects impactthe various above mentioned
departmentswithregardtonecessaryreview,these projects may
also takethe three week period.
Every attempt wtll be made by this departmentto expedite this
permttas spon as possible.
I.the undersigned,understandtheplancheckprocedure and time
frame.
l
greed to by ·..
Project Name
,
75 louth frontage road
vall.colorado 81657
(303)479-21.38 or 479-2139 office of community development
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTEREDWITHTHE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16,1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING &MATERIAL STORAGE
In summary,Ordinance No.6 states that it is unlawful for any
person to litter,track or deposit any soil,rock,sand,debris
or material,including trash dumpsters,portable toilets and
workmen vehicles upon any street,sidewalk,alley or pUblic
place or any portion thereof.The right-of-way on all Town of
Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft.off pavement .
This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail
Public Works Department.Persons found violating this ordinance
will be given a24 hour written notice to remove said material .
In the event the person so notified does not comply with the
notice within the 24 hour time specified,the Public Works
Department will remove said material at the expense of person
notified.The provisions of this ordinance shall not be
applicable to construction,maintenance or repair projects of
any street or alley or any utilities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No.6 in full,please stop by the Town of
Vail Building Department to obtain a copy.Thank you for your
cooperation on this matter.
Position/Relationship to Project (i.e.contractor,owner)
Date
_____AM
l.......l.ffiJ -S Hffi.t:>
FR I
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
)h ",~
qqq -ltjO~
~
t l «(r er-
C A L LER 1 'i /r f\J
M ON TUE S ~THUR
(I 6Y'~HPc;f)7J1~(L
PER MIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
1:_'-U
DAT E _'6=--__-.LL-JOB NA ME _..........~---'-_-'-.....::..-__""'___:....:..._
BUILDING:PLUMBING :
o FOO TINGS /ST EEL o U NDERG ROUN D
o FO UNDATION /STEEL o RO UGH /D W .V.
o FRA MING o ROUGH /WATER
ROOF &SH EER o GAS PI PINGoPLYWOODNAILING
o I NSULATION o POO L /H .TUB
o SHEETROCK NAIL 0
0 0
o FINAL o FINAL
1l:eCTRIC~MECHANICAL:
O ..,EMP.O WER o H EATING
o ROUGH o EXHAUST HOODS
o CONDUI T o S UPPLY ·AIR
0 0
Xl FINAL o FINAL
8 APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
o DISAPPROVED o REINSPEC T ION REQUIRED
DATE _I NSPECTOR --'-"--_
-eFritzlenPierceBriner
A RCH IT E CT UR E P L ANr-<IN G I NT E R I O R S
FritzlenPierceBriner
..:..:::C ...I •=::.u :)~~t.,:.-,I-~I "'.G.•~;)-:;:<~
Lettering Style:Unrestricted but as approved by
Town of Vail.
Sizes:(5)Total 5'-6 "x 1'-10"
remaining are 4'-6"x 1'-10"
Sign Appliques:allowed sign size per Town of Vail
sign code based on frontage of in-
dividual tenant.
Synopsis:
Sign Boards:copper clad all sides
Colors:Navy blue,royal blue,red,forest green,
tea l green are allowed.
Awnings:All are canvas on top and typically,four
sides.
At no time will there be more than five of the 5'-6"by
1'-10"signboards,the remaining must be 4'-6"by 1'-10 "
boards,regardless of future store configurations.
Should a storefront reconfiguration occur,the sign size
that is applied to the board shall still be based on the
frontage of the new storefront size.
Should a reconfiguration occur where additional stores
create/maintain two distinctly separate entrances,each
entrance shall have an awning/sign subject to the Town
of Vail approval process .The total allowed sign(s )
size is still subject to the frontage formula set forth
by the sign code.
The program shall be adhered to unless the program it-
self is changed through the process provided by the Town
of Vail.Should the storefronts be reconfigured,the
entry portions of the storefront shall have an
awning/signboard similar to the existing inst3llations.
Sign Program Amendment Criteria
Requirements:Must be metal,projected
mount with 5/8"to-3/4"collar
maximum 3"projection.
Lettering
Lionshead Centre Sign Program
Protection of entry also serves as the assembly that the
sign is mounted upon.Rather than placing the sign let-
tering on the face of the awning ,the sign is placed
below the canvas portion,this allows a more consistent,
aesthetically pleasing location for the sign -as it is
more related to the entry itself and the pedestrian en-
vironment of Lionshead Mall.Additionally,the objective
of attaining a discrete lighting for the sign is ob-
tained.The signboard portion of the awning is an inte-
gral part of the awning design.The boards and awnings
will be a part of the building,not a tenant owned el-
ement.The sign which is applied to the board is
tenant-specific.The intent of the sign portion of the
board is to allow individual expression of the tenant
entry.
All sign lettering or graphic must leave 3"border
on sign board.
Lettering Colors:Unrestricted but as approved by
the Town of Vail.(Intended to be
harmonious with the awning color.
Lighting:Low voltage incandescent or halogen mini-
spot lights -concealed in fabric awning
portion.
1ge 1·
cONS.DO C
~-Oct-93..
POS T OFFICE BOX 57 1000 UONSRIDGE LOOP VAIL COLORADO 81658 3034766342 FAX303 476 4901
NICl fIITZWIllC .I)U '-muM 'OCr 100
Page 2
LIONS.DOC
04-0ct-93
POST OFFICE BOX 57 100 0 UONSRIDGE LOOP VAIL COLORAD O8165830 34766342FAX 3034764901
IOU Cln.fllttl-.(Ol...'...h l"'....CII.....1
A RCHITECTURE PLANN ING I N T E R IORS
~tzlenPierceBriner e
{
II LIONSHEAD CENTRE SIGN PROGRAMlMAX.TENANT NAME FRONTAGE SIGN SIZE BOARD SIZE it SIGNSLIN.FT.SQ.FT.r A-YOUNGER GEN 74 10 LARGE ONEIB-KENNY'S 107 10 EA.LARGE(2)TWOIC-CRAZY SHIRT 23.5 4.7 SMALL ONEID-SWEET LIFE 26 5.2 SMALL ONEIE-GALA JEWEL 18.5 3.7 SMALL ONEIF-VAIL SKIER 28 5.6 SMALL ONEIG-CLEAVER'S 15 3.0 SMALL ONEIH-VAIL T 39 7.8 LARGE ONE*I *VAIL T-SHIRT HAS 2ND FRONTAGE ON N.SIDE W/ENTRY****VAIL T 17 3.4 SMALL ONE
I-GARFINKEL'S 38 7.6 LARGE ONEL
----_._---
-,.'0 .........
II e;,.·f"V+-TCr'"-
·~_JC_.-..!L-r
----:.---.,,--------r------------
-.
SITE 'PLA N'
Not to Scale
KEY:•...
--
Location o f l ar ge sign-
board (5 total)
Location of entries
(10-1-93)
Indicates frontage for
sign size
2I'I[~C ['~IT2 .(,"1'1(.08"-FRIl1llN PIE ~(E IIMI'lI '
POST OFF ICE BOX57 1000 LlONSRI DGE LOOP VAIL COLORA DO 81658 3034766342 FAX303476 490 1
•
~~...'I -••
3
1/111 1 1/l':::-/P
__C.Rul/f~A~.,
'r .~
'.j
.\,
:.~
...s
S)!
_'I
~!
/
I...-----f
-----~,
PALATKNO I...J.
I
________--1
.cO F F'~12-':::L-I'-.P F"1;'(I,JOOD e ~rz:~l/.
1<11 ~Il M I t-l ~f'1O ~1 r1 ET~~(iYF")
p •
AL.~6~H~$-ro BE<F"~J ~,.~P
110 LUJr •MAX .3 11 F'~..1 ~1Ot-J
6~1~~f~.:'AT ~17 0 41""
OF.t'feTAL.H~Y 130100
~w>rz.e p AS ~J!':::;-
,....-----#--------=----------"1.4--
I uI6o'l-J~l:'.
I ~'Ze:/e;.')1
_,1
.L'---__~\_1 .._.5'~~'__
~[
(1\1-iI:
~...
"--V ~~I f Y l-O?J'<['"IOf,J CJP:t1oLlI-l1\Io.l 61
B~~i P ~l o l2 W '5I6l H
\'-AYouT fP AVOI~COt-lfl.-l~l$
WI L-~if~~MOUl4illJCl!
I
I
i ".,.~~I !v""iZJ lO~
li==~~';~f"1ZO.J ~1':1='t"1 0Uf1 f'1.-"'11"~~lJ/
1 ~\-.~!3OL-re:p f lZOr1
11+~~JZ..
I ../:.:.
~IAO
-z
<
~.7N e AWHIN"
..VII 11 II':l -.p
4
t
"
I
./
.L>-~
J [F
-,!:'..0..
.It :-~r-
9 -/-7'>
--~-J[-.~'-
f-::
J !r==
enwo,
>-I-
o
<C
[~F
--=.-
..r-.......
~l
~n J n fl
r J I-
~r=
-
[rr=
It --
II Jt ..
~z
·z«
...J
I C-alI'...-1co
U
UJ U)
0;1-..u
.u-0(J)z
I
-i,
I
l.
__...r------
"=..._·,,=-==---=,J .L ----_.
•........-
i t
~~
J--'
J
I
I
~.-0
',,-I ~I...
L ·...
11\
C\
~.':»-S!,"•~
(I)
r i l!l1 r...."--...
\'~"\%~
,'\
.,'6'
.~,".:~w ..:
•~'C"..:.:.
.'"t
~;::
-,
•
~~..~~"
.,..
".~
;;.,.
,.
!~
I
:Z*,,7'7 I
;
J
!
•
,.,.
r:r .
!\."
I .\
I .
\
\
\
-~
$i.-
.,§j-
.;:7f:.
~_-~--t
I
I
'L
......."
\
\
\~-....-,
.".'......
\
\
....ot..,yslnr ~.()I
~65"I """~_e \M.~I
\
&I \
.---4-----l5:~~::_\t .,I'.:,
~-::--V 'I(J.\
~.......,""'....,:.>.;--~I../He 6'f6J""GIl:'-".,.-_..-
"
::?;1~f~:-,'~'~'
;"~~~~~~t',~'
,,.
"'----~~R;JtdNC~.t~·)
.
.L.PT~
~,
r-
I I
,
\,,"
\'
At.-__
\
\
'1
•...
,;
-..,-)",
f ,
•,
\J
'S
~
~
~
0')
~
~
b<s
~-
I -'''-/D.J ""-
I i
i
I
,
•i
I
i •
I "-I 1
I I I
'::t-I ,
I •,!,I j...
I I !~;I....I i i ~\,i ,,l ~I --:I III
:I I .~
;~.
~,
~~
I ~..I
I--I...-----.."-
:i i :~+.__.-V"-.--.
\
:".I~i ...
~.
-.....;
.i .~.._.
.----......
'It -..--
~~...~t:-~
\1 -...
I '.....
-
I ~r---
I T-\~
>'(.
7i\
"""-~.
I'JC\:
~
~l~-~
"::::-~-.:l ~\~~~~~~().~~~~IS-\~~~...C4.:.\-..~"~,~.....\.~~
:
--;
:
"-
\v -----..,
I
_.----_.r _....
::.
-.-.-..---..
------..-,
..
..,
~...::>
(.-
\.-
.~
-~--.-;Itj --
~--:
--0 ---
--:-~-\J --,---,-
.~~
~-IU'
_:-'-)~
~--~.
<,
'J
•
Sand stone Buff Key2
'17 Forest Gr een"Key2 108,1507,1813
re ready-mixed Devoe ExteriorFinishesinwh ich th atcolor is
(03)is availablein mos t Devoe lines.
•
---_..--:-
I '
...--::;.:
•
...
...
5/31/90
Lionshead Center Building
Request to enclose trash dumpsters which are inside of the parking
garage.Upon examination of the plans from 1969,it was discovered
that concrete parking bumpers had not been planned for the area
where the dumpsters are,and also that a door opened onto this
area.These observations lead to the assumption that this area was
never intended for parking,and therefore a building permit was
issued for the dumpster enclosure.
box 100
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476 ·5613
Lionshead Center
c/o Slifer and Company
Eox 1248
Vail,Colorado 81657
Dear Sir:
department of community development
December 19,1977
,
.':".
....~~..
=.=----.
The Town of .Vai1 is amending the Zoning Ordinance to
allow a limited number of private parking spaces to be leased
ona long-term basis.A copy of the proposed ordinance is
enclosed .
Extensive studies of parking utilization were conducted
during last ski season.These studies indicated that most
priv~te parking lots had spaces available even during peak ski
season.
You are eligible to lease 4 parking spaces.If you wish
to participate in this leasing program,please complete the
enclosed form and return it with an application fee of $10.00
to us for review and approval.
Dana S.Toughill
Zoning Administrator
DST/di
Enclosure
.,
.'.
.':'...;J.._'.~__._..-_
_.....~iwi'•-_._....--:.;;..;;._.;:.:.0'7 '__-~__.~---..-.ft:._~~=-----=--=-..--._.........--.-
~---_.._..--------
i I/;._C/·.~i
briner/strain
architects
143 e-nea n :v or
',ad co 0'.0 ~16t')7
3031 .1 1 128
EXTERIOR PHOTOS OF UNIT 305 LIONSHEAD CENTRE
•
•.,
Item No.5 A request for an exterior alteration and a conditional
use permit in order to enclose a deck in CCII at the
Chart House Restaurant.
Applicant:Chart House Restaurant
Tabled to August 14,1989 PEC meeting.
The motion was made by Peggy Osterfoss and seconded by Chuck Crist.
Vote:5-0,all in favor.
Item No.6 est for an
Cent ra buildin
ominium.
Applicant:Iker
exterior alteration at the
for modifications to an
Belansteguigoitia
Betsy Rosolack gave the staff presentation.She explained that the
applicant wished to add 348 square feet of gross residential floor
area to their condominium unit.The 348 square feet addition would
include an expansion to the master bedroom by partially enclosing a
deck and remodeling the interior.Betsy covered the zoning
considerations,pointing out that there are 3,170 square feet of GRFA
left to be developed.She stated that the staff was supportive of the
proposed redevelopment and believed it met the zoning and Urban Design
Considerations for Commercial Core II.
Tom Briner r epresented the applicant.
concerning the proposal.
He explained the circumstances
A motion for approval was made by Peggy Osterfos s .The motion was
seconded by Chuck Crist.
Vote:5-0,all in favor.
Item No.7A request to amend Special Development District No.1 9,
Garden of the Gods.
Applicant:Mrs.A.G.Hill
Item No.8
Item to be tabled to August 14 PEC meeting.
Peggy Osterfoss made the first Illation.The motion was seconded by
Chuck Crist .
Vote:5-0 ,all in favor .
A request to modify the floodplain Lot 7,Block 3,Vail
Village Eleventh Filing,3070 Booth Creek Drive.
Applicant:David and Nancy Nystrom
The staff presentation was given by Kristan Pritz.She referred to a
diagram attached to the staff memo to explain the proposal.She
explained that the proposal met all the criteria for a floodplain
modification.The staff recommendation was for approval contingent
upon conditions listed in the staff memo.
,
520 W.Lionshead Mall.Vail,Colorado81657•1·303-476·3651
T o;TOVJN OF VAl L
CO MMU NITY DEVELo PEMENT
FROM;L IONSHEADCENTER BU !LDING
CONDOMINI UM ASSOC I ATI ON
RE;EX TERI OR REMODEL -UNIT 3 05
BO LES CUSTOMBUILDER S ,INC.has our p ermis si on t o proceed wi th th e
exteri or rern ode l of u n i t 305.
RESPECTFU LLY YO URS 1~~,----.~..-~----------
DATED,-----!-ifZl-u~--L<?-0 ----
!/lTY
•-,
community Development Department
Planning and Environmental Commission
-i
"
TO:
FROM :
••
DATE:
SUBJECT:
July 24,1989
A request for an exterior a~teration in order to
construct an addition.}:1"'>~)[.,-r.J Cev1-~
Applicant:Iker Belausteguigoitia
I.
/
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REQUEST /)1 3 u')
Mr.and Mrs.Iker Belausteguigoitia wish to add 348 sq6are feet of
gross residential floor area to their condiminium unit in the
Lionshead Center Building.Presently,Lionshead Center Building
has an excess GRFA of 3,170 square feet.I~this addition is
approved,the excess GRFA for the entire building will be reduced
to 2,822 square feet.
The 348 'square feet addition includes an expansion to the master
bedroom 'by partially enclosing a deck and remodeling the interior.
As the elevatlons and exterior photograph show,the impact of the
building exterior will be very minimal.To further minimize any
impact,the new siding and stain color will match the existing.
I I.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The following summarizes the zoning statistics regarding this
extrior alteration request.
,
1.Zone District:
Commercial Core II.
2.Density:
No change.
I
3.GRFA:
There are 3,170 square feet of GRFA left to be developed.
This proposal is for 348 square feet,leaving 2,822 square
feet of GRFA available for future use.
4.site coverage:
I
NO 'change.
5.Height:
••..
\..••
The height of the building is 37 feet.The maximum height in
Lionshead is 48 feet for a sloping roof.The addition will
be lower than the highest peak of the roof.
III.COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDEPLAN FOR LIONSHEAD
This proposal does not relate to any sub-area concepts.
IV.COMPLIANCE WITHTHE PURPOSE OF COMMERCIAL CORE II
The Commercial Core II district is intended to provide sites for a
mixture of mUltiple dwelings,lodges,and commercial
establishments in a clustered,unified development.Commercial
Core II District in accordance with the Vail Lionshead Urban
Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations is intended to ensure
adequate light,air,open space and other amenities appropriate to
the permitted types of building and uses and to maintain the
desirable qualities of the district by establishing appropriate
site development standards.
This proposal is in compliance with the purpose of Commercial Core
II .
V.COMPLIANCE WITH URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR VAIL!LIONSHEAD
The purpose of the comparison between the proposal and the
considerations is to show how the new design strengthens or
distracts from the intent of the design considerations.
Urban Design considerations
This consideration does not apply to this proposal.
Height and Massing
This addition will not change the height and massing.Urban
Design Considerations addresses one and two story additions at
ground level.
Roofs
The guidelines say flat,shed,vaulted,or dome roofs are
acceptable for building expansions.This would be a pitched roof.
The guidelines also mention the connection of roofs to existing
buildings and this addition is reflecting the design of the
existing roof.It does avoid a patchwork,"tacked on"quality
that should be avoide~in Lionshead.We feel that the roof pitch
..
..••
and the roof connection to the existing building are well designed
architecturally and are in compliance with the guideline as
outlined.
Facades/Transparency
Not applicable to this application.
Facades-Walls/structures
The applicant is proposing to match the existing materials and
exterior design of the building.
Decks and Patios
Partially enclosed decks are encouraged on sub-area concept No.
12,but that is on the ground level.This deck is on the roof,so
the consideration is not applicable.
Accent Elements
Not applicable to this application.
Landscape Elements
Not applicable to this application.
VI.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
This proposal meets all the zoning regulations for Lionshead.
VII.STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff is supportive of the proposed redevelopment.We
recommend approval of this proposal and believe it meets the
zoning and Urban Design Considerations for Commercial Core II.
'..:~lJ ••~
v ,
..
~
il"-,
~.
~.-,;,..;0 h...
.'"(~~(~,
.)tl,
~()I:,~
III th ~
r-<'"."
,
r-
'.
\---.-,\.
\'\-....
\\.-.
\~
!
I'::-r--.__~---:'
I•r
!;~-'-"1I
I -
I !
-__',,~.J
,....
"
,,
Pr
fj '
I .
!l :,..
Il
I
:1,---1,ir----:=-;-
C~.~--;:'-"r:---r===-----;=:::::fT"~~---J -::::;j -
.-
f
-----
»
---~~,I
-,.
•d!I':i .
:~:I i'"
.!
-,-'-'.,.===rr
"II
'I
I=-=':
.j,
:
~·1.-.
Ii .li -"...1 ;'.:~'.~:.,ti _',Ii;.t ',,t .-~,..~.'!...~....,:........
-~
I l ~~J
-'----------,------
------.......
·....-..-·_=-t
•'I
~-~....I !
•
",
I"
,;
,r:-:-_=--:~__-=-_~.::!I..-.
.\
,.~~'~~~
..
,='E±:__.-?-.P"~,==r --~=~~='--;r-~-i
,.
I,
I
~~-,:
,":I ~
---.--,
I
,~!--~'
I I 'I
i •I 1:~~-:-............--'~~.
:~T"'",--;'T 1 "'"'fI,''i II ,I':,!,
-«
..'
..
.~'.
'--I.e ;.',.....
:
/\/1 \
/\/1 \
/\\
/\I \I \
/\I \I \I'
I \I \I \I II\/\I \I I
/\I \I \I
..,
PARTIAL SUUTH ELEVATIUN
I
I
~
•.-
~"lJ
~»..::::0
~-1
0>-
u·»
-r-,.
o'zo
::::0
-1
I
fT1r-rn
<»
-1
o
Z
I,
i I
I I
II
II
!I
I,
I
~----+--ilII,
II
I I
I I
I I
III
I I
W---'--I:I
--+---J !I
--~I:I
I I---t----j ,
--,----"I
--t-----j i I
--7--1 'I--~I i l
--,--~:I---T-----1 !I
--t--~I
.II---!----j !I
II--,----j !I
:I--"7----j I I
---t----j :n
"Ull.L...-..._
..
".·-----
.'•'1
;
i
i
_"__i-~~~o _
/
o ·
B --
C!
5 /.-,N/SHADtE !,A/J P,Acr OR4WIt'lG
US/H6 50°5VNA1'JGLE ~VAIL-V/a,AGE DE6IGI'ICVtJGlD!3P.Ai,i:::NS
...-~
'...
"..._........'ft !"...,._
TO:
FROM:.
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
July 24,1989
A request for an exterior alteration in order to
construct an addition.
Applicant:Iker Belausteguigoitia
I.DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REQUEST
Mr.and Mrs.Iker Belausteguigoitia wish to add 348 square feet of
gross residential floor area to their condiminium unit in the
Lionshead Center Building.Presently,Lionshead Center Building
has an excess GRFA of 3,170 square feet.If this addition is
approved,the excess GRFA for the entire building will be reduced
to 2,822 square feet.
The 348 square feet addition includes an expansion to the master
bedroom by partially enclosing a deck and remodeling the interior.
As the elevations and exterior photograph show,the impact of the
building exterior will be very minimal.To further minimize any
impact,the new siding and stain color will match the existing.
II.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The following summarizes the zoning statistics regarding this
extrior alteration request.
1.Zone District:
commercial Core II.
2.Density:
No change.
3.GRFA:
There are 3,170 square feet of GRFA left to be developed.
This proposal is for 348 square feet,leaving 2,822 square
feet of GRFA available for future use.
4.site coverage:
No change.
5.Height:
••
The height of the building is 37 feet.The maximum height in
Lionshead is 48 feet for a sloping roof.The addition will
be lower than the highest peak of the roof.
III.COMPLIANCE WITHTHE URBAN DESIGNGUIDEPLANFORLIONSHEAD
This proposal does not relate to any sub-area concepts.
IV.COMPLIANCE WITHTHEPURPOSEOF COMMERCIAL CORE II
The Commercial Core II district is intended to provide sites for a
mixture of mUltiple dwelings,lodges,and commercial
establishments in a clustered,unified development.Commercial
Core II District in accordance with the Vail Lionshead Urban
Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations is intended to ensure
adequate light,air,open space and other amenities appropriate to
the permitted types of building and uses and to maintain the
desirable qualities of the district by establishing appropriate
site development standards.
This proposal is in compliance with the purpose of Commercial Core
II.
V.COMPLIANCE WITH URBAN DESIGNCONSIDERATIONSFOR VAIL/LIONSHEAD
The purpose of the comparison between the proposal and the
considerations is to show how the new design strengthens or
distracts from the intent of the design considerations.
Urban Design Considerations
This consideration does not apply to this proposal.
Height and Massing
This addition will not change the height and massing.Urban
Design Considerations addresses one and two story additions at
ground level.
Roofs
The guidelines say flat,shed,vaulted,or dome roofs are
acceptable for building expansions.This would be a pitched roof.
The guidelines also mention the connection of roofs to existing
buildings and this addition is reflecting the design of the
existing roof.It does avoid a patchwork,"tacked on"quality
that should be avoided in Lionshead.We feel that the roof pitch
..•
and the roof connection to the existing building are well designed
architecturally and are in compliance with the guideline as
outlined.
Facades/Transparency
Not applicable to this application.
Facades-Walls/structures
The applicant is proposing to match the existing materials and
exterior design of the building.
Decks and Patios
partially enclosed decks are encouraged on sub-area concept No .
12,but that is on the ground level.This deck is on the roof,so
the consideration is not applicable.
Accent Elements
Not applicable to this application.
Landscape Elements
Not applicable to this application.
VI.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
This proposal meets all the zoning regulations for Lionshead.
VII.STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff is supportive of the proposed redevelopment.We
recommend approval of this proposal and believe it meets the
zoning and Urban Design Considerations for Commercial Core II.
••ProjectApplication
Da te 8/2/89
Project Name :LIONSHEAD CENTER EX EERIOR ALTERATION
476-3038
Pr oject De sc ri ption :[JqdA;s iOA hi alIi t;305
Contact Personand Ph one _T-,-,o",m-,,-,B~r,-l,-,'n.:..::e:..:.r__----'-'--"'--"'-="'-_
Ow ner,Ad dressa ndPh one:I KER BELANSTEGUlGOITIA
A rchitect ,A ddress and Ph one :_
addition to
L egal D e scription :L ot ,Bl ock .Fi l in g ,Z one _
Co mments:_
DesignReviewBoard
D ate _
Mo tionb y:SantI'
Sec onded by :HU.e"'-rLrLi'-'""'Q""t.,.n:.J.p.:-_
A PPROVAL D ISAPPROVAL
5-0
S umm ary :-7-'--L-"C~
Dat e:
T owh Plan ner
}
8/2/R9
D Staff Approval
••
.....-..._.......
-y .'';'
~~;~~~
..~.~.;~
",_.•...•·r _.'-
,'."\'!::JI:j
..,;i:!W-•......;.':~...~.....,'*';
,-....:.1'""-......:~~
APPLI CATION DATE:JK.-:5:.;,J.;:..:.~:.:.~...:.......·_:.~~
DATE OF ORB }lEETIiiG:~'2.let9'\
.',.,
•
..•..
ORB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLI CATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFOR ~"AT10N IS SUBI1ITi~D*-
I.PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
..4 '0 •
A.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PifdJaA e,ytc/tJ'lU"<t't ftJ"f det;k
~~rnAAAPr~~
A pre-application meetingwithaplanning staff member ,is strongly suggestedto
determine if any additi una I information i sneeded.No application ·....111 be acce:Jted ":,:,.::';
unless it is comn l'ete(must include all items required by thezoning adnurri str-at nr-},,,~~;::
It isthe applicant's responsibility to make anappointmentwiththe staff to fin d
".......
outabout additional submittal requirements.Please note that a COHPLETE applica-;',:~"::':~
tion will streamline theapprovalprocess for your project by decreasin g the numcer ,
of conditions ofapproval that the ORB may stipulate.ALL conditions ofapproval must <;;
be resolved bef.o .r:-e a building permit .i s issued.":,'.'.~:,:"
.._~~
ff)~~:';:..:;::
B.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address LlcrnjAeM
Legal Description Lot
.,.r.:'>
ee..JF</3tI1/ttII~tfM,i;I 305 /
5 Block 8teek,I Fil ing
Zon ing c.~mJ44~aJ Q,Jel1
C.NAHE OF APPLI CANT:I ker 8ele!nste$u/goir/q
Address Av.lIorAc/~/0/,Hex/co .4;::,1/5~telep hone,4:}c-S:Si1S'2"1 '73
•
D.NANE OF APPLI CAN T'S REP RESE NTATI VE:Boner /SfmJn Arch/~
Address 14-~E .MeadDWDr,lip/I ~91"57 telephone if'ji;3l>~B
E.NANE OF OWNERS:Ike!:l3.R/an5fe&l/d/9t?/t/4
Signature ~J3vv;,,/(f;;r ~~)
Address Cp ~rlJ1erlSt-pqll?Afl11J'le~tele phone _
F.ORB FEE:The fee will bepaid at thetimea building permit is requested.
VALUATION FEE.:..:;=--
$0-$10.000
$10.001-$50.000
$:,50.001 -$150.000
$150.001 -$.500.000
$500.001-$1,000.000
$Over $1,000.000
$10.00
$25.00
$50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBNISSIONS TO THE ORB:
1.In addition tomeeting submittal requirements.the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners.Trees that will be removed
should also be marked.This wor k mustbecompleted before the OR B visits the
site.
2.The review process for 'NEWBUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetings
of the Design Review Board,soplan on at least two meetings for their approval.
3.People who fail toappearbeforethe Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who havenotaskedfora postponement will be required tobe
republished.
-.-.
••
...j..-..~'.....
•:-•1
c·~.1..........--.....
4.The followingitems no longer have tobe presented tothe Design Review Board.
They,however,havetobe presented tothe Zoning Administrator for approvai:
a.Windows,skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing planeofthe building;and
b.Building add itions that are not viewed from any other lot or public space,
wnich have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition;and/or approval from theagent f or,or manager ofa condo minium
association.
......:.:;«!
5.You may be required toconductNatural Hazard Studies onyour property.You should
checkwitha Town Planner before proceeding.
.--
...
....-
•
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
•
.•".oA
.:.,~
...-
3.
I.NEW CONSTRUCTION
A.Topographic map and site planof site containing :he following(2 co~ies):
1.Licensed surveyor's stamo.
2.Centaur intervals ofnot more than2'unless theparcel consists of 6 acresor
more,in which case,S'contour intervals will be accepted.
Existing trees orgroupsof trees havingtrunkswithdiametersof41
'or more
one foot above grade.
4.Rock outcroppings and other sianificant natural fea~ures (large boulders,
intermittent streams,etc.).-
5.Avalanch~areas,100 yearflood plain and slopes 40%ormore,if applicable.
6.Tiesto existing benchmark,either USGS landmark orsewer invert.
~..Locationsofthe following:
_.__~.Proposed surface drainage on and off s ite showi ng size and typeof
culverts,swales,etc.
b.Exact locations of all utilities to include existing sources and pro~osed
service lines from sourcestothe structure.Utilities to include:
cable TV
Telephone
sewer
water
gas
electri c
c.Property lines showing distances and bearings and a basis ofbearing
d.Proposed driveways with percen~slope and spot elevations
e.Alleasements
8.Existing and finished grades.
9.All existing and proposed improvements including structures,landscaped areas,
service areas,storage areas,walks,driveways,off-street parking,loading
areas,retaining walls (withspot elevations),and other site improvements.
10.Elevations oftopofroof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath)to
determine height of building.
B.A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability.To
be submitted with site plan.
C.Preliminary title report to accompany all submittals,to insure property ownership
.anda ll,easements on property.
D.Landscape Plan(1"=20'or larger)-2 copies
1.Show the location of4"diameteror 'larger trees,:other 's hru 6 s ~a ii a -ii a t iV e olants t.
are onthe site and the 1ocati on and desi gn ofproposed 1andscape areas 'tiith
the varieties andapproximate sizes of plant materials tobe planted.~
2.Complete landscape materials list.
3.Designate trees tobesaved and thosetobe lost •
•
NOTE:As much ofthe above information as possible shouldoccuronthe site plan,so that
the inter-relation ofthevarious components is clear.The landscapeplanshouldbe
separate.The existing to~ographic and vegetational characteristics may bea separate
map.The applicant must stake the site to show lot lines and building corners.Trees
that will be lost during construction mustbe tagged.The work shouldbecompleted
before the ORB site visit.
••...
..
E..••.Arcrri tecture lPlans (l/S":::l'or larger)2 copies
1.Must include floor plans and all elevations asthey will appear on completion.
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades.
2.Exterior surfacing materials and c:lors shall be specified and submit:2d for
review on the'materials list available from the Department of Community Deveiop-
ment.Color chips,siding samples etc.,shouldbe presented at the Design Review
Board meeting.
....
F.The Zoning Administrator and/or DRB may require thesubmissionof additional plans.
drawings,specifications,samoles and other material (including a model)if deemeo
necessary todeterminewhethera project wi ll comply withdesign guidelines.
mNOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photosor sketches that clearly indicate what is prooosed and the location (site plan)
ofproposal may be submitted in lieu ofthe more formal requirements givenabove,as
longastheyprovide all important specifications for theproposed including colors and
materials tobe us~ti ..-
ADDITIONS -RESIDENTIAL OR CO:·11·1ERCIAL
A.Original floor planswith all specifications shown
B.Floorplan for addition -2 copies
C.Site plan 'showing existing and proposed construction -2 copiestopos
D.Elevations of addition
E.Photosof existing structure
F.Specifications for all materials and color samples on materials list available at
Depar~~ent of Community Development
At the request ofthe Design Review Administrator you may also be required tosubmit:
G.Statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability.See
attached utility location verification form .
.H.Site improvement survey,stamped by registered professional surveyor.
1.Preliminary title report,verifying owner shipof property and lists of easementS.
I .FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building permithasbeen issued.and when the project is underNay,the following
will be required before any building receives aframing inspection from theBuilding
Department:A certified improvement survey sho\'ling:
A.Building locations with ties to property corners,i.e.distances and angles.
B.Building dimensionsto nearest tenth of foot.
C.All utility service lines as-bui1ts showing size of lines,typeof material used,
and exact locations.2 copies
D.Drainage as-builts.2 copies
E.Basisof bearing to tie to section corner.
F.All property pins are tobe either found or ·set and stated on map •
G.Alleasements •
H.~uilding floor elevations androof ridge elevations.
••
Thef oll owi ng information is reauired for sub mitt~l byt he applicant to t heDesign Review
Board before a final approval CJn be fiven:
A.BUI lDI::G i·IATEIAlS:TYPE OF ~lA TE;::IA l COL OR
Roof wPM 5hlbg)W!.j :b .M atd,~X'.5/1lo ..
Sid ing ..-verfJw Wn4 5Jaf~f6 ~u,eXJ5T-1Y?j
Other Wall Materials
Fasci a
Soff i ts
Windcws
Wi ndcw Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Ch i mn eys
Tras h Enclosures
-
...
(bflWo.l)i-P ~~4'..sJ-2'~
"
-
,.
Greenho uses
Other
B.lANDSC API NG:
~J oW ('v-1lWh)1b ~~
~In"~~+6
-------:~~+,,;t r'Df~
Name of Des i gner:'II\./..:..~.!..---:
phone:
PLA NT j·lATERIAlS:Botani ca 1 Na me
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO ___
BE REi·I OV ED
Cammon Name Quan itv Si ze"
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height for conifers.
.(over)
•...
•
-PLMlT :1ATER.IALS:Bot anical ~I ilme
(can't)
SHRUBS
EX I STI ;~G SHRUBS
TO BE RE i-lOVED
Tvoe
~
GROU::O CCVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATIO~l
Co:m:on ~:am e
•
Quani t o"
I ••
..•...;
._...r'-:oJl-~...-"..-............
Si ze
...~
Souare F0 0raae
TYPE OR ~'ET HOD OF _
EROSION CONTROL
C.OTHER 'LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences.swimming pools,etc.)Please specify.
,,•
----
tr'"!..~.£L +J-Vk-r _....,~)\,._
A ,,~-r jJ f~
vVt~'-"h(//Lr
•
'------------_.-
rn h D L..~r}yML-1 Dt->--j /'-"""';'i'-,//-VM-~~)~~G
~~~~~C lL --(<-i2ila~/~
&J s :~/s LA _--~(~)L .~kC ~)
7
Vr~~~~J;~r ~~.u-x-;h h
<II -9,J ~,W'__r ---
¥.o.-o?l<f<./r(r1-c1 '-'I'0 t,/?L rd~
r .'t
•ra/J'/
~A-3o J -c..H ~+-?v
G''1CPA-:
•
/)/>.('V ::)"(
)0;<~S-d
IY x IV
I(
-r;=§~:;-7
I I ~
')0
e...--
:2:r 3y-I-L .;
(,'Z ..,?~:5,(fV~t.---/.J ...eo -~
~---'~==---
~-I-('//_~S(['t!L c>'..
11ay ?i:1989
,.1 .-"
APPLICATION FO&~FOR
EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE II (CCII)
VAIL L IONSHEAD
I.This procedure required for a lteration of an existing bUilding which
adds or removes any enclosed f loor area or outdoor patio or replace-
ment of an existing bUilding shall be subject to review by the Plan-
ning and Environme ntal Commis sion.'
The application will not b ea ccepted un til all information is s ubm itted.
PHONE 905-545-24-73
,.
~NAME OF APPL ICAJ.'l T-I-l':k~e~r~Bel;;l.l.wa:U'J-:!Sut.<:p:.ygiLllJ...Li~gQl.Ll.L·t.....lu•a'--_
ADDRESS AV.lIoracia 1019 tlexic o DE 115S0
2.NAME OF APPLICANT I S REPRES E NTATIVE Br i lie,/5 tt II;I i ARchitects
ADDRES '1-43 E.tleado'il Or.,Suite tJ-40 Vail.CO 81657 PHONE 303-476-3038
3 .NAM E OF OWN ER (p ri nt or type)ful'---&I>-pl....il;l+ll.:lls>-I.t..,P.y.glu.I1.l.\·g:>,-oLJi.....t..J.i<l.a _
S IGNATURE,_
ADDRESS AV.Horacia 1019 Mexico D 1=11550 PHONE 905-545-24-73
4 .LOCAT ION OF PROPOSAL
1':',,;::;..:
ADDRESS :LiQAShead C€Hltre Blinding.Unit 305
5.
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONr:Lo;-.tF"""""l5;-.~B~I7\"orctrt<-1t'",---11i-«3;tt-fF+i '1-1i1iImlg:rl'~ft'al1i-tl_f/tLTi661ft~S5-lR'ltC~aH:dl----.-----
FEE $100.0 0 ,.".p AI D y'.2.,'7/%'7,.117J [L .!SJ':~7.~~~.(~.~..:'.~
.',.'.'.'.,..".,,j'.•:.'.•
6.I mpr ovement survey of property showing property line s and .location
o f bui ld ing and a ny improvements on the land.
7.Al is t of the n ame of owner s of all property adjacent t o the
subj ect prop ertyand their MAILING addresses.
I I.Fou r(4 )c opi es o fa site plan c ontaining the fo llowi ng i nf ormat ion:
0.(.
A.The sitep la n shall be drawn o na sheet size of 2 4"x36"at a
scale of 1"=20';a va riation o f t he sh eet or scale may be ap-
proved by the Community Development Depar t ment if j ustified;
B.The d at e,north arrow ,scale and name of t he proposed d evelopment
s hall be s hown on the site plan;
•
June 1,1989
briner/strain Planning and Environmental Commission
architects Town of Vail
Vail,Colorado 81657
143 f!rne adow dr
vail,ector ace 8 160l
13031 476 3038
Dear Commission Members:
•
J y i';
Mr.and Mrs.Iker Belausteguigoitia wish to add -333 GRFA to
their condominium unit in the Lionshead Centre Building as shown
on the attached drawings.Presently Lionshead Centre Building
has excess GRFA of 3,170.If this addition is approved excess
GRFA for the entire building will be reduced to 2,837.
Approximately 180 sq.ft.of the proposed addition will be
provided by enclosing half the area of an existing exterior
deck.The balance of the addition (153 GRFA)will be provided
by building over an existing roof.(See Loft Level Floor Plan -
Sheet A2,and Cross section 1/A3).
As the photographs of the building exterior show,the existing
deck can not be seen from grade level.Further when sitting on
this deck views to the surrounding mountains are blocked by the
high surrounding roofs.(See Partial East Elevation 2/A3).
Finally the present design of the exterior deck causes it to
fill with snow in the winter and there has been a history of
leaks into the units below.Therefore the purpose of this
exterior modification is to increase the useability of the
present exterior deck.
The proposed project includes the following elements:
a.Addition of 333 GRFA to accommodate a sitting room off the
existing master bedroom,a separate whirlpool room,
additional closet space,and improved views of Vail Mountain
to the south;
b.Remodeling a closet in the existing master bath to
accommodate a washer and dryer:
c.Anew straight run of stair to replace the existing spiral
stair so access to the loft level meets current building
code requirements;
d.Remodeling of the current main entry to the unit to enlarge
the dining area.
e.Addition of two skylights,one over the living room and one
over the west bedroom.Each skylight will be approximately
13'-0"x 4'-6".Each skylight will be constructed of flat
clear glass set in the plane of the existing roof on an 8"
high curb.Curb and skylight frames will be stained to
match the existing cedar shingle roof.
As the elevations and exterior photographs show,impact to the
building exterior will be very minimal.To further minimize any
impact new exterior siding and stain colors will be specified to
match those presently on the building.
,•
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 1,1989
Page 2
•
Compliance with the Urban Design Considerations section of the
Vail Lionshead Design Considerations:
a.Height and Massing:
Guidelines for height and massing address construction
at grade and relation to pedestrian scale.Proposed
exterior alterations are one story in height at
building's fourth or "10ft'·level and will have no
impact on pedestrian scale at grade.
b.Roofs:
Proposed roof is shed type with pitch identical to
adjacent roofs of existing building.Roof surfacing
will be built-up,gravel ballasted roofing to match
adjacent roofs of existing building.Overhangs and
fascia treatment will be identical with that found on
adjacent roofs,so that addition will appear to be part
of the original design of the building.The proposed
roof1ine will be slightly lower than the adjacent roof,
which runs the entire length of the building,to
provide some variety in roof forms.Proposed roof
overhands are 1'-3".Overall roof design will not
increase snow slides onto pedestrian walks.Proposed
gutters will be enclosed from below and heat-taped.
Building a sloped roof over a portion of the existing
exterior deck,which acts as a snow catcher,should
reduce overall snow loads on the structure and reduce
water infiltration which has been a problem in this
location in the past.
c.Facades -Walls/Structure:
Wall surfacing will be vertical T&G siding stained to
match existing siding on the building.Trim and window
frames will be white to match existing trim and window
frame colors.
d.Facades -Transparency:
These guidelines apply to street level commercial space
rather than additions on the fourth floor.
e.Decks &Patios:
These guidelines apply to ground and second level decks
and patios where such features might strengthen street
activities.The deck we propose to reduce in size is
on the fourth level where its existence does not impact
street activities and where in fact it can not be seen
f~om the street.
f.Accent Elements:
No accent elements are proposed as part of this
project.
g.Landscape Elements:
Since the proposed addition is at the fourth level,
this project has no impact on landscape e1emen
,,.•
Planning and Environmental Commission
June I,1989
Page 3
•
In summary the proposed project will make only slight changes to
Lionshead Centre building in a location hardly noticeable when
standing at grade.Further the proposed height and massing,
roof form and exterior materials are all designed to blend into
the existing character of the building;to look like this
addition was built as part of the original building.Therefore
we believe this proposal complies with the Vail Lionshead Urban
Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of this project.We
believe this project will be of considerable benefit not only to
Mr.&Mrs.Iker but also to the entire condominium association.
We hope you will see fit to grant approval.
Sincerely,
~().JJ:-
~am es D.strain,R.A.
Enclosures
•
PUBLICNOTICE
•
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
commission of the Town of Vail will hold a pUblic hearing in
accordance with section 18.66.060 of the municipal code of the
Town of Vail on July 24,1989 at 3:00 PM in the Town of Vail
Municipal Bcilding.
Consideration of:
1.A request for side and front setback variances in
order to construct a garage and decks on Lot 4,Block
E,Vail das Schone First Filing.
Applicant:_Judith Nichols
2.A request to amend the development plan for the Talon
at 1881 Lionsridge Loop,Lot 1,Blk 3,Lionsridge #3,
and Lot 27,Blk 2,Lionsridge Subdivision #3
Applicant:Parkwood Realty Company
3.A request for a density variance,height variance,
exterior alteration and parking variance and Special
Development District zoning for the Enzian Lodge at
705 West Lionshead circle,Lot 1,Block 2,Vail
Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant:Enzian Lodge
4.A request for an exterior alteration and a conditional
use permit in order to enclose a deck in CCII at the
Chart House Restaurant .
Applicant:Chart House Restaurant
5.A request for an exterior alteration at the Lionshead
Center Building for modifications to an existing
condominium.
Applicant:Iker Belansteguigoitia
6.A request for a height variance and an exterior
alteration in order to construct an addition to the
Gore Creek Plaza Building at 193 Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant:Rodney and Beth Slifer
Mad-e~-+0 cJ)j '".csvVlA-~
"11 (p (~'1
••
7.A request for an exterior alteration in commercial
Core II for siglu--a glass dome structure located in
the Lionshead Mall.
Applicant:Vail Associates
8.A request to amend Special Development District No.
19,Garden of the Gods.
Applic~nt:Mrs.A.G.Hill
The applications and information about the proposals are
available for public inspection,in the zoning administrator's
office during office hours.
TOWN OFVAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on July 7,1989.
••
LLQlJSHEA D_CE N 'l:RE~Bt:L.sUl1!1llBY
-10 &Y I 'I'o-:/S-f1a.I ~-'L"'~'l-Ji"cc:»It ,
Proposed/lGRFA"ad diti o ns by Condo Unit:
<......,
un it 10 1 :J 'r 8 ~.;g .ft .
Uni t 204 ]78 sq .f t.
un it 30 4 3 '78 sq .ft .
unit 2 07 23 0 s q .ft .
Uni t 30 7 75 sq .~t .
un it 2 08 50 '1 sq .ft .
u n it '30 8 258 sq .ft .
uni t 209 3 44 sq .ft .
(Deck already enclose d)
(Dec k already e nclos ed )
333
~Un j..t_~l 0.~.__....~_...J-<i-5 _~!L.f t,,-,.e..-_.(Dec k aJ,r.~~q...Q Y_Q.nc L9..~.Qcl J..
2 r 89=.s q.f t .P ro p osed GFRA Additi ons 1:0 Date
3,17 0 sSl...Lt ,pre seDt Unused GFR},
277 sq .f t .Unused GFRARema in i ng
T :L
2..:f {J
••
MA -r ~.'\Q-:}41_I '5 o ~~:::.I ::J
.~NOr ~Dq :"3"t4-~--lS"o "/1
"
I f 4q ~
---~
4"3v0
lM-bv--e.Me ~)
I
II "311°
-q-1"Y
~tp~fM )J!
'WvtJ{~of ~:::'-p.,
~.
o
tlay 22 ,19 89'ctf v_H<J-J
"APP LIC2\TION FOIU1 F OR
EXTERIOR AL TE RATI ON SOR MODIPICATI ONS I N COMM ERC IAL COREI I (C C II)
VAI L L IONSHEA[)
..,,
t.'·-'
I .Th i s procedur e required for alterution o f an exis t in g bu ilding wh i ch
ad ds o rr emoves Qny enc~osed floor ar ea or outdoor patio or rep lace -
me n t of a n e xis ting bUi lding sha ll be s Ubject t o revi ew by t he Plan-
ning a nd Envi ron me ntal Co =i ssio n.
The app l icat ion will n ot b e accepted until al l information is s ubmittec
1 ~NAt-lE OFAP PL ICAJ.'l T _I_ke:O:Y'_[l~e~ll-ca1llc!S>.J.t..t:e~g.llIl-L;~Q 0l.Ll.l..'t",-lu'a"--_
AD DR ES S~-a€-'i o-l-01-9--l~O D F 1]S5D.PlIO NE90 5 -5 45-24 -7 3
2 .NN1E OF A?PL IC.i\.l\lT I S RE PRESENTAT IVE _Brine r /S ?\in---A RelTi-t-f'0 t S-S-------
AD D R E S~_I4 ~~-[}h,-Su ite N-~O Va ;1 .CO 8 1657 PHO?'j E303 -4 76-3 038
3 .NAt-IE OF OWNER (pr int or type )_l~RI'-l}P-l.au-s..l.Jte....g,tJ.l .wd~glUo--'-;-l..tJ-,-,'a,,---_
SI GNATURE _
A DDRESS-AV-.--fl W'a G-W---l_019 Mexico 0 E 11550 P HONE90 5 -5 45 -24 -73
4 .LOCATIO NOF PROPOSAL
(':'"..,::.':
A DDRES S :Li 0 nshead Cen tre Bui,'WI d.L;UO.lj,QI-a,--I./U.lln-Li....t -'3""0"'-'5,_
LEGALDE S CRIPTIONLa l:5.13 Ibe k 1 ,13 t .F i 11 119 Va i1 /Li 0 ors,srl1Al€e-aaad---------
5 .F EE $1 00.00 ,..
6 .I mp r ov emen t survey o f property showing p ro pe rty line s and locat ion
o fb ui ld ing and any improv ements on the l and.
7 .A list of t he nQme of owners of all property adjacen t to the
s ubj e ct propertyand t heir r.JAI LING ad dres s e s.
I I.Four (4)c op ies o f u site p l an conta ining the fo llow ing i nformat ion:
0.(.
A.The s ite pl ans hal l be draHn o na sheet size of 24 "x 36"at a
scal eo f 1"=2 0 ';a variation of the sh e et or s cale may be ap -
proved b y t he Community Devel opm ent Depar tment if justifi ed;
B .The d ate ,no::-th arrm"scale and na me of t he p ro p ose d deve lopme n t
shall be s ho'NJ1 o n the s ite plan;
brill8(/scott
architects
143 emeadowd r
Irdil.co lorado 81657
(303)476 ·3038
•
Dec emb er 2,1986
Mr.Tom Brown
c/o Town of Vai l
Co mnu nity Devel opmen t Dep artnren t
P.O .Box 100
Va i 1 ,Co lorado 8 1658
Re:Li onshea dCentre Bu il ding propos ed
Dear Tom :
•
Fo ll ow ing are names andaddre sses of adjacent pr ope rty ownerst o
th eLionshead Centre Bu ilding .Ibelieve t his complieswith re-
quirementNo.7of t he App l ication for Exte r ior Altera tions ....
in Comm erc ia l CoreII Vai l Lionsh ead s ubm i tted No vember 24.I f
you should havea nyques ti onsplease g ive me aca ll .
Yo urs tru ly,
Tt'wI
Th oma s A.Briner
1)Gond ola Bu il ding :
2)Li on sheadArcade :
3)Tract C:
4)Tra ct sB and D:
5 )Tre etops:
1/~\.-}2...(
cc :Eus taquio Co rtina
Vail Assoc iate s,Box 7 ,Vail 8165 8
Robe rt 1.a naDia ne J .l.a z i er
Box 627 ,V ai l ~t§c::.58~__~_
Town of Vail,Box 100,Vail 81658
Vail Associa tes,Box 7,Vail 8165 8
Pierre La~326i.Sout hTama rac Dr ive
#200 ,De nver 8023 1
••
LIONSHEADCENTREGRFA SUMMARY
Proposed GRFA additions by Condo Unit:
Unused GFRA Remaining
Proposed GFRA Additi on s to Date
Present Unused GFRA
(Deck alr eady e nclosed)
(D eck a lr eady enclose d)
.~(Deck alAead y enclos edL
unit 1 01 \378 sq.ft.
Unit 204 \378 sq.ft .\
Un it 304 \3 78 sq.ft.,
"
Unit 207 \.230 s q.ft.
unit 307 7 5 sq .ft.
Unit 208 507 s q.ft.
"
Unit 308 2 58 sq .'ft.-.
unit 209 3 44 sq.ft.\
,/
.Unit 305 i 345 s q<ft .
2 ,895 sq .ft .
r 3 .170 sg.ft.
i,277 sq .ft.j
L
••
LLQlJSHEA D_CE N 'l:RE~Bt:L.sUl1!1llBY
-10 &Y I 'I'o-:/S-f1a.I ~-'L"'~'l-Ji"cc:»It ,
Proposed/lGRFA"ad diti o ns by Condo Unit:
<......,
un it 10 1 :J 'r 8 ~.;g .ft .
Uni t 204 ]78 sq .f t.
un it 30 4 3 '78 sq .ft .
unit 2 07 23 0 s q .ft .
Uni t 30 7 75 sq .~t .
un it 2 08 50 '1 sq .ft .
u n it '30 8 258 sq .ft .
uni t 209 3 44 sq .ft .
(Deck already enclose d)
(Dec k already e nclos ed )
333
~Un j..t_~l 0.~.__....~_...J-<i-5 _~!L.f t,,-,.e..-_.(Dec k aJ,r.~~q...Q Y_Q.nc L9..~.Qcl J..
2 r 89=.s q.f t .P ro p osed GFRA Additi ons 1:0 Date
3,17 0 sSl...Lt ,pre seDt Unused GFR},
277 sq .f t .Unused GFRARema in i ng
T :L
2..:f {J
••
MA -r ~.'\Q-:}41_I '5 o ~~:::.I ::J
.~NOr ~Dq :"3"t4-~--lS"o "/1
"
I f 4q ~
---~
4"3v0
lM-bv--e.Me ~)
I
II "311°
-q-1"Y
~tp~fM )J!
'WvtJ{~of ~:::'-p.,
~.
o
tlay 22 ,19 89'ctf v_H<J-J
"APP LIC2\TION FOIU1 F OR
EXTERIOR AL TE RATI ON SOR MODIPICATI ONS I N COMM ERC IAL COREI I (C C II)
VAI L L IONSHEA[)
..,,
t.'·-'
I .Th i s procedur e required for alterution o f an exis t in g bu ilding wh i ch
ad ds o rr emoves Qny enc~osed floor ar ea or outdoor patio or rep lace -
me n t of a n e xis ting bUi lding sha ll be s Ubject t o revi ew by t he Plan-
ning a nd Envi ron me ntal Co =i ssio n.
The app l icat ion will n ot b e accepted until al l information is s ubmittec
1 ~NAt-lE OFAP PL ICAJ.'l T _I_ke:O:Y'_[l~e~ll-ca1llc!S>.J.t..t:e~g.llIl-L;~Q 0l.Ll.l..'t",-lu'a"--_
AD DR ES S~-a€-'i o-l-01-9--l~O D F 1]S5D.PlIO NE90 5 -5 45-24 -7 3
2 .NN1E OF A?PL IC.i\.l\lT I S RE PRESENTAT IVE _Brine r /S ?\in---A RelTi-t-f'0 t S-S-------
AD D R E S~_I4 ~~-[}h,-Su ite N-~O Va ;1 .CO 8 1657 PHO?'j E303 -4 76-3 038
3 .NAt-IE OF OWNER (pr int or type )_l~RI'-l}P-l.au-s..l.Jte....g,tJ.l .wd~glUo--'-;-l..tJ-,-,'a,,---_
SI GNATURE _
A DDRESS-AV-.--fl W'a G-W---l_019 Mexico 0 E 11550 P HONE90 5 -5 45 -24 -73
4 .LOCATIO NOF PROPOSAL
(':'"..,::.':
A DDRES S :Li 0 nshead Cen tre Bui,'WI d.L;UO.lj,QI-a,--I./U.lln-Li....t -'3""0"'-'5,_
LEGALDE S CRIPTIONLa l:5.13 Ibe k 1 ,13 t .F i 11 119 Va i1 /Li 0 ors,srl1Al€e-aaad---------
5 .F EE $1 00.00 ,..
6 .I mp r ov emen t survey o f property showing p ro pe rty line s and locat ion
o fb ui ld ing and any improv ements on the l and.
7 .A list of t he nQme of owners of all property adjacen t to the
s ubj e ct propertyand t heir r.JAI LING ad dres s e s.
I I.Four (4)c op ies o f u site p l an conta ining the fo llow ing i nformat ion:
0.(.
A.The s ite pl ans hal l be draHn o na sheet size of 24 "x 36"at a
scal eo f 1"=2 0 ';a variation of the sh e et or s cale may be ap -
proved b y t he Community Devel opm ent Depar tment if justifi ed;
B .The d ate ,no::-th arrm"scale and na me of t he p ro p ose d deve lopme n t
shall be s ho'NJ1 o n the s ite plan;
brill8(/scott
architects
143 emeadowd r
Irdil.co lorado 81657
(303)476 ·3038
•
Dec emb er 2,1986
Mr.Tom Brown
c/o Town of Vai l
Co mnu nity Devel opmen t Dep artnren t
P.O .Box 100
Va i 1 ,Co lorado 8 1658
Re:Li onshea dCentre Bu il ding propos ed
Dear Tom :
•
Fo ll ow ing are names andaddre sses of adjacent pr ope rty ownerst o
th eLionshead Centre Bu ilding .Ibelieve t his complieswith re-
quirementNo.7of t he App l ication for Exte r ior Altera tions ....
in Comm erc ia l CoreII Vai l Lionsh ead s ubm i tted No vember 24.I f
you should havea nyques ti onsplease g ive me aca ll .
Yo urs tru ly,
Tt'wI
Th oma s A.Briner
1)Gond ola Bu il ding :
2)Li on sheadArcade :
3)Tract C:
4)Tra ct sB and D:
5 )Tre etops:
1/~\.-}2...(
cc :Eus taquio Co rtina
Vail Assoc iate s,Box 7 ,Vail 8165 8
Robe rt 1.a naDia ne J .l.a z i er
Box 627 ,V ai l ~t§c::.58~__~_
Town of Vail,Box 100,Vail 81658
Vail Associa tes,Box 7,Vail 8165 8
Pierre La~326i.Sout hTama rac Dr ive
#200 ,De nver 8023 1
••
LIONSHEADCENTREGRFA SUMMARY
Proposed GRFA additions by Condo Unit:
Unused GFRA Remaining
Proposed GFRA Additi on s to Date
Present Unused GFRA
(Deck alr eady e nclosed)
(D eck a lr eady enclose d)
.~(Deck alAead y enclos edL
unit 1 01 \378 sq.ft.
Unit 204 \378 sq.ft .\
Un it 304 \3 78 sq.ft.,
"
Unit 207 \.230 s q.ft.
unit 307 7 5 sq .ft.
Unit 208 507 s q.ft.
"
Unit 308 2 58 sq .'ft.-.
unit 209 3 44 sq.ft.\
,/
.Unit 305 i 345 s q<ft .
2 ,895 sq .ft .
r 3 .170 sg.ft.
i,277 sq .ft.j
L
•ProjectApplication •
Date -'-_
Project N ame:_
Project D escription:-'-_~____'=__'___''_'__'___=__
Contact Person and Phone
Owner,Addressa ndPh one :_
A rchitect ,A ddressand Phone:
Legal Description :L ot _B lock Fili ng ,Z one _
C omments:----''-'--''--,.-_
Moti on by :
Second ed by :
f
I J (,4
I
r
DesignReviewBoard
J
D ate _
APPRO VAL D ISAPPROVAL
Summary :_
I
Dat e :
/
T own Plan ner
///,r /
D Sta ffA pproval
lhe p,i"lery -Ya ll
•
•
L AZIER COMMERCIAL PROPERTI ES
P.O.BO X 13 25
Vail,CO 81658
TO:LionsHead Arcade Commercial Property Tenants
The Board of Directors of the LionsHead Arcade Condominium Association met
February 23,1985 and d iscussed the chage of exterior colors of the building
as well as the commercial store front colors .Following are the results of that
meeting .
Th e building wi ll be stained this summer .We will give you sufficient notice
to enable you to schedule you r store hours,r emove your awnings,an make other
necessary arrangements for your business.
T he colors whic h we re c hosen for comme rcia l s to re fronts are :
These colors are to be used for awnings a nd window stops on ly.If you have
any questions,please call 476-0906.
Cordially,
Kit Williams
Lazier Commercial Properties
~LIST OF MATERIALS ...
I ~A M E OF PROJECT :~UE ~P!:J,£:W?1O'"-1 l1"O Vo/Y~mc~
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO N:LOT BLOCK FILING
STREET ADDRESS :?,0H S,1/;€.()O ------
DESCRIPTIO N OF PROJECT:~C1C fl;c.I£~c.....J/HbOi<L\
rzp ~E/a~sC ~Mepbe",a=:
~L/~H>'~.6lt!t"..q('?i?6?!'"L..p/NtS
The followinginformation is required for submittal by the applicant tothe Design Review
Board beforea final approval canbe fiven:
A.BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim,
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chi mneys
Trash Enclosu res
Greenhouses
Other
TYPE OF MATERIAL
~/h'b~~
H/4
/0<-""c:?..&CJY ~.mS P;rt),co
1Y/4
-.Y7~&/.c:-rr $"!~Z'£fD
~Q L$B..pY kV/H?QY''s
..5n'...t.6 L:C¥1~.s
\~erne
COLOR
B.LANDSCAPING:Name of Design er:
phone :
PLANT MATERIALS:Botanical Name
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTI NG TREES TO ___
BE REMOVED
Common Name Quanity Size*
*Indicate caliper fordeciducious trees.Indicate height for conifers.
(over)
•
PLANT MATERIALS:Botanical Name
(con 't)
SHR UBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROU ND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
Common Na me
•
Quanity Size
Square Footage
TYPE OR METHOD OFEROSIONCONTROL -------------------
C.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swimming pools,etc.)Please specify.
,
~~(~'--'.S t<.4()~
o Lv?-",.,:J•APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DRB MEETIi~G:.SePTif?trJt¥=e Z/8b
7
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED*****
I.PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application meetingwithaplanning staff member is strongly suggestedto
determine if any additional information isneeded.No application will be accepted
unless it iscomplete (must include all items required by thezoning administrator).
It isthe applicant's responsibility to make anappointmentwiththe staff tofind
outabout additional submittal requirements.Please note that a COMPLETE applica-
tion will streamline theapprovalprocess for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions ofapproval that the DRB may stipulate.ALL conditions ofapproval must
be resolved beforea building permitis issued.
,4 00//-..10 FouQ .o..60L-$~
Tt:Je WesT ,F'IP:S;T ~
A.PROJ ECT DES CRI PTI 0N:-"-':.=.=::....<...:..--'-=~--':-'=-=_'="O'.=.::..--=""'-L_-'-'-~'--_
("UI"-Ia:x.{Oo)S VO
B.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address L/OVS~~..o~
Legal Description Lot Block Fili ng _
Zoning _
E.NAME OF OWNERS:
C.NAME OF APPLI CANT:-=&;t3==--:=::C8.=-'~=='?:.!../._'='.6fG=='_____
Address 3~.E.,6/Ah".5£..,;Iy'~c#A"'J.On telephone .¢-70 -5&"o
D.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:~~~.~~~~~
Address ,/:O .&::¥-.-z.&~£»1&.?D.&658 telephone 9'7'9 -5 t:!>S-,
-BoB G-/ht:,/~
Signature ----==.;.0:::::=f.-P==..:::::...=..-~-----L!::.=_7L--=:.:.-;::...--------
eo..,BQ,.C.Vo (0
F.DRB FEE :The fee will bepaid at thetimea build ing permit is requested.
VALUATION FEE.;......;....;......;...-
$o-$10,000 $10.00
$10,001 -$50,000 $25.00
$50,001 -$150,000 $50.00
$150,001 -$.500,000 $100.00
$500,001 -$1,000,000 $200.00
$Over $1,000,000 $300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIO NS TO THE DRB:
1.In addition tomeeting submittal requirements,the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners.Trees that will be removed
should also be marked.This work must be completed beforethe DRB visits the
si te.
2.The reviewprocess for NEWBUILDI NGS will normally involve two separate meetings
ofthe Design Review Board,soplan on at least two meetings for their approval.
3.People who fail toappearbeforethe Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have notasked for a postponement will be required tobe
republished.
••
4.The following items no longer have tobe presentedtothe Design Review Bo ard.
They,however,have t obe presented tot he Zoning Ad min istrato r fo r approval:
a.Windows,skylights and si milar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing planeofthe building;and
b.Building additions that are not viewed from any other lot or publicspace,
which have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition;and/or approval from theagent for,or manager ofa condominium
association.
5.You may be required toconductNatural Hazard Studies onyour property .You should
checkwitha TownPlanner before proceeding.
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)479-2138
(303)479-2139
June 7,1989
David Levi
P.O.Box 789
Vail,Colorado 81658
Dear Dave,
•
officeof community development
This letter is in regards to the common corridor leading to the newly
remodeled Davis Deli,as per our conversation about the condition of
the corridor in reference to the barn wood and corbels that need to
be removed to bring that corridor in compliance with the 1985 Uniform
Building Code,Section 3306.This section requires that all
corridors for this type of occupancy are required to be of one hour
fire rated construction and a class one smoke and flame spread.The
current barn wood and head obstructions that exist in this corridor
must be removed and a one hour fire rating achieved.
Iam aware that this corridor is a common area that would require
condominium association approval.The Town of Vail will require a
letter from the association approving these changes.Whether or not
the association helps monetarily with this upgrade,the upgrade must
be done regardless and is tied to the final occupancy approval for
the deli.
If you or anyone from the association has any further questions
regarding this item,please do not hesitate to contact me at my
office at 479-2138.I thank you in advance for your cooperation.
sincer~)y-,.---=.~
GaryZrain
Chief Building Official
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Plann~and Environmental commiJiton
community Development Department
June 27,1988
A request for an exterior alteration in order to
construct an addition to the Lionshead Center
Building
Applicant:Lionshead Center Condominium Association
At the PEC meeting of June 13,1988,the Lionshead Center
Building proposal was tabled in order to allow the applicant to
resolve the issue of appropriate landscaping at the west end of
the building.The applicant has submitted to the staff a
revised landscaping plan for our review and comment.The
building has been pulled back five feet at the west end,no
longer encroaching into the required setback.In summary,the
plan involves adding four 20'-25'cottonwood trees,two of
which would be in the pUblic area of the mall,two of which
would directly buffer the west end of the building.In
addition to these two cottonwood trees,there would be a
planter stepped down along the staircase of the western end of
the building that would contain aspen and juniper ground cover.
On the other side of the staircase,toward the Gondola
Building,the planter has been redesigned in a less ·formal
manner and includes a mix of aspen and spruce trees.
The landscape proposal for the sculpture area at the east mall
entry has been amended to the point where the only change
proposed in that area is the addition of spruce trees to the
existing landscaping behind the wall area.
In the initial staff review of this proposal,staff made
comments and suggestions.We believe that the original
proposal for redevelopment of the sculpture area at the east
entry was a good design,and a positive contribution to that
area.We feel that we should maintain the original proposal
that included a slight relocation of the sculpture and the
adding of a grassy area.
At the west elevation of the building,we feel that the fact
that the building has been pulled back five feet,no longer
requiring a setback variance,and the addition of the landscape
elements do present an appropriate buffer.We feel the design
is more compatible with the Urban Design Guide Plan suggestions
for the west end of this building.We do have minor location
and species suggestions:We feel that some evergreen could be
introduced along the face of the building,but agree that that
level of detail is more of a Design Review Board issue than a
Planning Commission issue.Therefore,we support the changes
proposed by the applicant.
••
January
75 south frontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
~~3)41'lj tpgo,officeofcommunitydevelopment
Mr.Eustaquio cortina
Lionshead Centre Condo Ass.
c/o Vail Home Rentals
143 East Meadow Drive
#365
Vail,Colorado 81657
Re:Lionshead Centre Expansion
Dear Eustaquio:
On Thursday of last week,the community Development staff met
on site and reviewed the latest site planning proposal for t he
Lionshead Centre expansion.Our general response to your
proposed program was positive.We felt that the additional
planting and landscaping areas contribute to the plaza and
reduce the impact of the loss of the landscaped area at the
western end of the Lionshead Centre building.Upon completion
of detailed building elevations,we would like to meet with
your architect on site to discuss a few possible refinements to
the site planning and elevations.
Following this discussion,I believe we will be ready to start
the formal review process.We will continue to keep you
informed as to submission requirements and scheduling detai ls.
I look forward to cont inuing working with you on this pro jec t.
Sincerel~~-eLL 111.;
Rick Pylman
Town Planner
RP:br
cc:Gary Swetish
••
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 27,1988
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
MEMBERS ABSENT
Bryan Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
Grant Riva
STAFFPRESENT
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylman
Larry Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
The meeting was called to order by Jim Viele,chairman.
1.Approval of minutes of June 13.
seconded to approve the minutes.
Diana moved and Pam
Vote was 4-0 in favor.
2.A re '10~alteration and a setback
variance in order 0 consruct an addition to the
Buildin j
A licant:Li shead Ce er Condo Association
!.'-'~
Rick Pylman explairied~proposal.He explained that the
building had been pulled back,and that now there was no need
for a setback variance,merely an exterior alteration.Rick
showed the revised site plans and landscape plans.He added
that the applicant had also changed the design at the Skiers
Sculpture,but that the staff preferred the original design.
The new proposal showed only the addition of trees in this
area.
Tom Briner,representing the applicant,showed a sketch of the
west end of the building with changes.Pam Hopkins expressed
appreciation for the changes made to the building.sid felt
that the applicant had addressed all of his concerns.Diana
Donovan wanted to pass along to the ORB her feeling that most
of the trees should be evergreens,or else if not,that
Christmas lights be placed in the trees in the winter.Jim
Viele agreed with Diana.He also added that he felt the plan
represented a significant improvement.
Rick asked the board how they felt about the design at the
Skiers Sculpture.They seemed to feel that just the addition
of the trees was O.K.Diana suggested encouraging the ORB to
soften the area with the addition of grass.
Diana moved to approve the request for an exterior alteration
per the staff memo with the direction to ORB to request
evergreens or lights and to soften the area around the Skiers
Sculpture.The motion was seconded by Pam and the vote was
4-0 in favor.
••
3.A request for a side setback variance in order to
construct an addition to a duplex located at Lot 2,Gore
Creek Meadows,Filing 1.
Applicant:Firooz E.Zadeh
Kristan Pritz presented the request.The staff recommendation
was for approval,as it was felt it was not a grant of special
privilege.A similar type of variance was granted the owner of
the other side of the duplex.
Diana moved and Pam seconded to approve the setback variance
per the staff memo and the finding concerning strict
interpretation.The vote was 4-0 in favor.
4.A request for a side setback variance,a parking variance
and for a density variance in order to construct an
addition to the Tivoli Lodge located on Lot E,Block 2,
Vail Village 5th Filing.
Applicant:Robert Lazier
Tom Braun explained the requests and showed site plans and
elevations.He reviewed the criteria,explaining the inter-
relatedness of the requests.Torn then discussed the criteria
and findings,the related policies to the Comprehensive Plan,
and the concern about valet parking.He explained that the
staff was concerned about the proposal for many reasons.They
felt that the mass could be reduced,thereby minimizing impacts
on adjacent properties and the pUblic walk way.Another
concern was the interim and permanent parking solution.Torn
stated that the Action Plan recommended a "small infill"in
this area.It was felt that the level of development proposed
and the number of variances involved outweighed the benefits,
and the staff recommended denial of the requests.
Jay Peterson,representing the applicant,stated that the plan
envisioned by the Master Plan proposed parking on the P-2 Lot
and Jay felt that these spaces were actually on site,as they
were owned by the Tivoli.He mentioned that the applicant
could have requested an SOD,but without the SOD,many
variances were needed.Jay stated that the purpose of the
proposal was to up-grade the family-owned lodge.He stated
that one purpose of the Action Plan was to increase the number
of accommodation units.He felt that the Town needed to
encourage proposals that added more hotel rooms.He disagreed
with the staff.Jay added that the parking demand was simply
not there.He also added that the view impacted was not
sacred.Jay felt that the proposal modified views,but did not
eliminated them.
Jay discussed the pedestrian way,stating that he felt the
resulting enclosure of the path was pleasing.He pointed out
that the Master Plan indicated 2-1/2 stories along Hanson Ranch
r :-•D.November 24,1986
APPLICATION FORM FOR
EXTERIORALTERATIONSOR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE II (CCII)
VAIL LIONSHEAD
I.This procedure required for alteration of an existing building which
adds or removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio or replace-
ment of an existing bUilding shall be subject to review by the Plan-
ning and Environmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
1 ~NAME OFAPPLICANT Vai 1 Lionshead Cent re Condominium Assoc ia tion
ADDRESS 520 E.Lionshead Circle PHONE 476-3651
2.NAME OFAPPLICANT I SREPRESENTATIVE Eustaquio Cortina
---~--------------
ADDRESS 520 E.Lionshead Circle PHONE 476-3651
PHONE 476-3651
Lionshead Centre Condo minium Association
SIGNATURE -+~~,;£---------------------
ADDRESS 520 E.Lionsh
3.NAME OF OWNE R
4.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
;'..~::.'
ADDRESS:Vail Lionshe ad Centre Building
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---,._
5.FEE $100.00
,...'(I,••••j ·..,l.':'"·
..'.~.~.:",~
6.Improvement survey of property showing property lines and .location
of building and any improvements on the land.
7.A list of the name of owners of all property adjacent to the
subject property and their MAILING addresses.
II.Four (4)copies of a site plan containing the following information:
A.The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24"x36"at a
scale of 1"=20';a variation of the sheet or scale may be ap-
proved by the Community Development Department if justified;
B.The date,north arrow,scale and name of the proposed development
shall be shown on the site plan;
cell••topographic character of the site including existing
contours.This condition will only be r equired for
area where there is a change of two feet of grade;
The existing
and proposed
an expansion
C."
D.The location and size of all existing and proposed buildings,
structures and improvements;
E.The existing and proposed landscaping patio additions or deletions.
III.The applicant shall submit in written and graphic form,a preponder-
ance of evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission
that the proposal is in conformance with the purposes of the CCII
District and that the proposal substantially complies with the Vail
Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan.
A.If the applicant is proposing a major change to the Vail Lionshead
Urban Design Guide Plan,the procedures for change are noted in
Section 18.24.220 (B).
IV.The applicant must also submit written and graphic supporting mater-
ials that the proposal substantially complies with the following
Urban Design Considerations section of the Vail Lionshead Design
Considerations.
A.Height and Massing
B.Roofs
C.Facades -Walls/Structure
D.Facades -Transparency
E.Decks and Patios
F.Accent Elements
G.Landscape Elements
Many of the above items should be addressed in some graphic means
using such tools as sketches,simulations,models (including neigh-
boring buildings),photos,etc.
./:.1:.1.l -.i ",•"/;I ;)..:...'",'.'....'(..
V.The Town of Vail zoning Code for CCII also describes other zoning
issues that the applicant must respond to in written or graphic
form.
VI.Applications for exterior alterations or modifications in CCII can
be received up to July 31,1980.After that date,the time frames
noted in Section 18.24.06S-A-S apply.
••COST &PRACTICALITY OFPLANTINGSFORLIONSHEAD MALL
RE:PHONE CONVERSATION WITHPAUL HARRINGTON 6/8/88
==========================================================================
EVERGREEN TREES:
Blue Spruce,Austrian Pine,Ponderosa,Lodgepole
Size:
Up to 5"caliper &12 ft.to 18 ft.high readily available.
6"to 7"caliper &20 ft.to 22 ft.high more difficult to find,
probably most available as Lodgepole.
Cost per tree (installation &1 year guarantee):
Up to 5"caliper &12 ft.to 18 ft.high $1,200.00 -$1,800.00.
6"to 7"caliper &20 ft.to 22 ft.high $2,200.00 -$2,500 .00.
plus cost of mechanical spade at $120.00 per hour.
DECIDUOUS TREES:
Cottonwoods
Size:
5"caliper to 8"caliper &18 ft.to 25 ft.high readily
available.
Cost per tree (installation &1 year guarantee):
Up to 5"caliper &18 ft.high $750.00.
6"to 8"caliper &22 ft.to 25 ft.high $800.00 plus cost of
mechanical spade at $120.00 per hour.
Aspen
Size:
Up to 5"caliper &14 ft.to 18 ft.high readily available.
6"to 7"caliper &22 ft.to 24 ft.high more difficult to find.
In this size range usually can only get in mUltiple trunks.
Cost per tree (installation &1 year guarantee):
Up to 5"caliper &14 ft.to 18 ft.high $750.00.
6"to 7"caliper &22 ft.to 24 ft.high $800.00 PlY.§.cost of
mechanical spade at $120.00 per hour.
NOTES:
1.Tree installation for trees above 5"caliper requires use and
access for a mechanical spade of from 84"wide to 98"wide.
2.Mechanical spade operators can often locate trees in the larger
sizes.
3.Installation of trees 5"caliper and below can be balled &
burlaped and installed by hand with the assistance of a small
tractor.
4.Size of existing trees that can be successfully transplanted
depends upon the species of tree,its condition and the condition
of the soil.It the soil is sandy a mechanical spade will have
to be used even for smaller sizes.Transplanting sizes up to 9"
caliper is possible but anything over 5"caliper will have to be
transplanted with a mechanical spade.Transplanting existing
trees will not be guaranteed.
J
;
•
•
lI\
/"'0 r»;
-
0
rt1 tJ \'J V
\I-
in
I
).
0
:::-
0
T
•-
....'
r
\
"
-
"*
......
f ,
-
,
~I
o
•
•
•••
---'
bmerscott
architects
143 e.meadow dr.
vail.colorado81657
(303)476 -3038
•
May 12,1988
Mr.Rick Py1man
Town Planner
Town ofVail
75 S.Frontage Rd.
Vail,Co.81657
Dear Ri ck:
Enclosed please find our written description of this project's compliance
withtheVail Lionshead Urban Design Guide PlanandtheVail Lionshead
Urban Design Considerations.
Please note that I have calculated the increase in GRFA (we remain below
theallowed maximum).
Our current proposalhasaddressedthe Staff concernsas spelled outinthe
memo tothePlanning and Environmental Commission datedFebruary23,1987:
1.The present scheme eliminates the fixed canopy overhang ofthe property
line thus maintaining suitable width for the Fire and Public Works Depart-
ments.
2.Although the proposed expansiondoes eliminate landscaping at the N.W.
corner of site,it is proposedto add trees and planters at 5 other
locations inthe Mall for a substantial increase in landscaping.
Regarding building set backstheproposednorth and southexpansion would
extendtothe property line -as recommended by the Urban Design Guide Plan.
Proposed expansiontothewest would encrouch5'into the10'required set
back,thus requiring a set back variance.As discussed in earlier memo's
we view the existing westfacade treatment asa lost opportunity toadd
visual vigor to this important end totheMall.To draw peopleand attention
aroundthe corner we believe it necessary and reasonable to wrap theproposed
expansionaroundthewest side.Ratherthan have this added feature occur
only at tbe ground level we are recommending window andbalcony additions to
the residential condominiums at the second and third levels.
I believe you andyour staff are aware ofthe various parties involvedwith
the Lionshead Centre Building.The past few months have leadtoadesign
which it is my understanding will meet with approvalof these various parties.
I hope you and your staff will beabletolendyour support to what we believe
will De a project very much inthe spirit of what was intended by the
authors of Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan,
If you have any questions please give me a call.
Yours truly,
T~A~
Thomas A.Briner
Enclosure
••
143e.meadowdr.
vail,co lorado 81657
(303)476 ·3038
COMPLIANCE WITH VAIL LIONSHEAD URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
briner/scott
architects Lionshead CentreBuilding
PlanningStudy11-24-86
The Design Guide Plan recommends expansionofthe existing retail
(Mall)level out into theMall.
Also,the Guide Plan points outthe opportunity for retail expansion
on thesouth side oftheLionsheadCentre Building.
The proposedexpansionofthe current scheme would occurtothenorth
ofthe existing east wing tothe property line -approximately 14 feet.
This would beahigh,one story addition with possibly asecond level
(office)above withaccess from existing stair.It is considered that
suchanexpansion would providea strong form at the entrance tothe
Ma 11 and could offer "strong architectural character"at the pedestri an
level.(Vail Lionshead Design Considerations -1980).
Expansion of present retail inthe east wing would bewesttothefaceof
thesecond and third floors above -approximately five feet.Retail activity
adjacent thesouth side ofthe Mall would expand northward approximately
13 feet.Thisfacade would be broken at store entrances and at two locations
reflecting entrances into the building lobby and aproposed restaurant.
Projecting an additional 4 feet to5 feet from thefacade is aproposed
translucent canopy -"creating pedestrian focus and (to)divert attention
from upper building heights and 'canyon'effect"(Vail Lionshead Design
Considerations -1980).
In order toprovidea stronger architectural edge and promote more
pedestrian activity,expansion is beingproposedto the west,varying
from 28 feet to 14 feet from the existing westfaceofthe building.
Expansion at this point would include two stepped levels above retail
with windows and architectural projections offering visual relief tothe
present blank end ofthe building.Thisconcept incorporates a "monumental"
stair system that would tie into the existing ramp/maze areasouthofthe
gondola ramp.This stair would providea direction aswellasaccess
down toalower terrace adjacent entrances into an expanded Childrens'
CenterforVail Associates.Above is proposed restaurant expansionto
include a smaller deckthan present,butone strategically located to view
the skiing activity and that woul :d be greatly more accessible and visible.
In summary the Owners believe theproposed additions are incompliance
with,and helpto reinforce,thedesign considerations established within
theVail Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan.However no work is to be done
without theapprovalofthe Lionshead Centre Condominium Association at its
annualmeeting December 29,1986.
••
TO:Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM:Community Development Department
DATE:February 23,1987
SUBJECT:Work Session on the Lionshead Center Building
This work session has been scheduled to allow the applicant an
opportunity to informally present design plans prior to formal
review by the Planning Commission .While a decision will not be
made on this proposal at this review,both applicant and staff are
desirous of hearing comments from the Planning Commission on this
proposal.
L
BACKGROUND OF THIS PROPOSAL
The Vail Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan sub-area concepts #11
and #12,both refer to redevelopment and expansion of the
Lionshead Center Building.These sub-area concepts refer to
commercial expansion on both the north and south sides of the
Lionshead Center Building.They provide for the opportunity of
expansion of building,arcades,awnings,etc.to improve the
scale,shelter and appearance of the facade.The majority of this
proposal relates very well to the sub-area concepts outlined in
the Urban Design Guide Plan.The proposal,however,also includes
building expansion to the west.The proposed design for this area
consists of the removal of a substantial landscaped area and
includes redesign of pedestrian circulation patterns in this area
between the Lionshead Center Building and the Gondola.
SUMMARY OFSTAFF CONCERNS
1.The one story commercial expansion proposed on the north side
of the building is basically in concert with that concept
expressed in the Urban Design Guide Plan.The degree of this
expansion,however,has raised some staff concerns.The
building footprint will extend to within approximately one
foot from the property line.The facade proposal includes a
fixed rigid canopy system running the length of the mall
frontage and encroaches approximately four feet over the
property line.This creates a width of only 16 feet from
canopy to the planter and staircase of the Lazier Building to
the north.This design does not include the relocation of
the existing street lighting located currently on the
Lionshead Center property.This distance of 16 feet is below
the required operational widths of the Fire and Public Wo rks
departments.
2.Expansion to the west of the existing building eliminates a
large area of landscaping.Staff believes that this is
probably the largest mature landscaped area within the entire
••
Lionshed Mall and feel some effort should be made to preserve
and maintain this landscaping.It should also be noted that
the CCII zone district has the requirement of 10 foot
setbacks,unless otherwise specified in the Urban Design
Guide Plan.While the Guide Plan specifies the northern and
southern expansions,the expansion to the west is not
specifically called out in the Guide Plan,and therefore will
necessitate approval of a setback variance.
CONCLUSION
While the staff is riot in a position to make a recommendation on
this project at this point in the review process,we will state
that,although the project generally meets the intent of the Urban
Design Guide Plan,we are concerned with a number of specific
issues and feel that this work session will be a positive climate
in which to discuss some of these concerns.
•
75 south f rontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)476 -7000
December 22,1987
•
office 01 community development
Mr.Eustaquio cortina
Lionshead Center Condominium Association
vail,Colorado 816 57
Re:Lionshead Center Building
Dear Eustaqu io:
With respect to the Lionhshead Center redevelopment proposal as
presented to us,the Community Development Department concerns
remain essentiall y as they were related to you in o ur co rres -
pondence in June of this year.The foremost issue that we have
with the project is the impact of development of the northwest
portion of the site.The area between Lionshead Center and the
Gondola Building is a very important gateway between Lionshead
and Vail Mountain.We feel the design of this area should
reinforce the interaction of Lionshead and the mounta in.We
believe that the building mass on the northwest po rtion of the
site negatively impacts this area.We feel that the existing
landscaping serves as an effective buffer in this transition
area,especially as compared to the ornamental landscap ing
found throughout the mall.
since June of this year,the community Development Department
has attempted to work with the proposed design.We have tried
to suggest amendments and alternatives that may mitigate some
of our concerns.The proposal most recently s ubmitted to us,a
Briner Scott site plan dated 12/10/87,does not present an
acceptable solution to us.We feel that this planter expansion
and landscaping addition does not serve as an adequate design
solution.We feel that this does not address the impacts of
the building expansion to this plaza area adequately.
••
We are,of course,interested and available to work with you in
an attempt to continue to resolve the concerns related to this
project.Our position at the moment,however,remains as
stated.If you have any questions,please feel free to contact
me at 476-7000.
Since~:~L---J
Rick Pylman
Town Planner
,••
TO:Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM:Community Development Department
DATE:June 13,1988
SUBJECT:A request for an exterior alteration in order to
construct an addition to the Lionshead Center
Building.
Applicant:Lionshead Center Condominium Association
I.DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REQUEST
The Lionshead Center Condominium Association is proposing
exterior alterations to the Lionshead Center Building
located at the east entrance to the Lionshead Mall.The
request entails a one-story retail expansion along the
north elevation of the Lionshead Center Building that then
wraps around the northwest corner of the building and
includes a portion of the west elevation.Above the
retail expansion on the west elevation is a one-and-a-half
story residential expansion of approximately nine-hundred
square feet.This expansion in conjunction with a small
enlargement of the manager's unit on the Mall level
creates a total residential GRFA increase of 1,152 square
feet but no additional units.
On the south elevation of the building,the application
proposes a partial enclosure of the existing deck for
restaurant and retail expansion.The amount of deck to be
enclosed for restaurant expansion is approximately 2,000
square feet,leaving approximately 1,700 square feet of
deck still open on the south elevation of the project.
Below the deck on the south elevation will be a fourteen-
foot building expansion that will house the Vail
Associates Lionshead Children's Center operations.This
fourteen-foot building expansion runs approximately 90
feet along the southern elevation of the building starting
at the southwestern corner.
The commercial Core II zone district requires 10-foot
setbacks from property lines.This required setback may
be waived if there are improvements that are shown in the
Urban Design Guideplan.The Urban Design Guideplan for
the Lionshead Center Building does recognize the retail
expansion on the north elevation.This proposal will
require a setback variance because of the five-foot
encroachment of the western elevation into this required
10-foot setback.The setback variance will be addressed
in a separate accompanying memorandum.
••
The proposed building expansion to the west elevation of
the building will require removal of a large area of
mature landscaping.The applicant has proposed several
planter additions to the pUblic areas of Lionshead Mall,
as well as a significant improvement to the sculpture at
the east mall entry,as mitigation for the removal of the
existing landscape.
II.COMPLIANCE FORTHE URBAN DESIGNGUIDEPLANFORLIONSHEAD
This proposal relates directly to Sub-Area Concepts No.
11 and No.12 of the Vail/Lionshead Urban Design
Guideplan.The plan refers to the first-floor retail
expansion on the s~~~~tevation and also presents the
opportunity for a ~l deck enclosure and expansion on
the north elevation of the building.
The following two paragraphs are the description of Sub-
Area No.11 and No.12 taken directly from the Urban
Design Guideplan.
No.11:
No.12:
"Commercial expansion (one-story)to increase
pedestrian emphasis,scale of Mall,and improve
shades on facades and accessibility."
"Opportunity exists for expansion of buildings,
arcades,awnings,etc.to improve scale,
shelter,and appearance of commercial facades."
The proposal on the southern and northern elevations
relates very well to the Vail/Lionshead Urban Design
Guideplan.We feel that these expansion will be positive
contributions to the Mall and from an urban design
viewpoint will contribute to the vitality and
pedestrianization of Lionshead.The improvements proposed
to the western elevation of the Lionshead Center Building
are not detailed in the Urban Design Guideplan.These
improvements will necessitate the removal of a large area
of mature landscaping,which is of considerable concern to
the staff.
III.COMPLIANCE WITH URBAN DESIGNCONSIDERATIONSFOR
VAIL/LIONSHEAD
The purpose of the comparison between the proposal and the
considerations is to show how the new design strengthens
or distracts from the overall intent of the Design
Considerations.
••
Height and Massing
The Urban Design Guideplan's architectural guidelines
recommends that building expansions be limited to one-
story unless a two-story addition is specifically called
out in the Guideplan.with respect to the proposed areas
of expansion,the south and north elevations certainly
address the concepts discussed in the guidelines.The
west elevation,two-and-a-half story addition,does create
massing concerns.The current building location,in
concert with the existing landscaping,provide a buffered
yet open view and transition area from the Mall to the
Mountain.The loss of the bUffering landscape area and
the addition of the massing on the western end of the
building narrow this area considerably,particUlarly as
approached from the east mall entry.
Urban Design Considerations
A great deal of this proposed expansion has nothing but
positive impacts with regard to urban design
considerations to the Lionshead Mall.Treatment of the
west elevation has raised some serious urban design issues
with the staff.Expansion of the western end of the
Lionshead Center Building eliminates a large,mature
landscape area that serves to reinforce the transition
from the hardscape of the Mall's plaza to the Vail
Mountain environment.We feel that this existing
landscaping is an important feature in this area of the
Mall and we are very uncomfortable with its proposed
treatment.The design of the building in this area,
stepping back several times around the corner,reflects
the concept of this area between the building and the
Gondola as a major gateway into,and out of,the Mall.
While we encourage the stepping concept,the staff feels
that the degree of encroachment of the current proposal is
still too great.
Roofs
Roof elements proposed in the one-story element expansion,
as well as the deck enclosure in back,consist of a 3.5 to
12 pitch.We feel that the roof pitch and the roof
connection to the existing building are well-designed
architecturally and are in compliance with the guideline
as outlined.
Facades-Walls/structures
The guidelines for facades and walls includes concrete,
glass,metal,stucco and wood as the primary materials to
be utilized in Lionshead.The applicant is proposing to
••
utilize concrete,glass,metal and tile as predominant
materials.We feel that these materials meet the
guidelines,yet should be reviewed by the Design Review
Board as a final determination for the architectural
compliance.The retail displays highlighted by a large
expanse of window is again encouraged through the design
guidelines.
Decks and Patios
This proposal involves Sub-Area Concept No.12,which
encourages a partial enclosure of the existing deck on the
north elevation of the Lionshead Center Building.It also
encourages continuation of utilization of a part of that
deck because of its ideal exposure to the mountain.The
staff is comfortable with this proposal and the ratio of
enclosure of the outdoor deck.We feel that the outdoor
deck on the corner provides vitality in its exposure to
passing pedestrians on the west,as well as tremendous
exposure to the mountain on the south.The staff is
comfortable with the amount of enclosure on the eastern
end of the deck.
Accent Elements
These elements are best addressed at the Design Review
Board level.
Landscape Elements
There are a number of landscape elements proposed for this
application.The first and foremost consideration in the
mind of the staff is the elimination of the mature
landscaping at the west end of the Lionshead Center
Building.We feel that this landscaping provides an
important buffer to the building,it helps indicate the
transition area from the Mall to the mountain,and,as the
largest and most mature landscaping within the Mall,is an
important feature to maintain.The proposal,while
indicating the removal of this landscaping,does include
several landscape elements that will be added to the
Lionshead Mall area.At the west end of the Lionshead
Center Building,just west of the staircase,the existing
landscaping will be recontured into three planters that
step down.Current landscape plans shows approximately
thirty trees located within these three planters.The
proposal also includes an expansion of the planter just
north of the VA ticket office.Two new planters between
the Lionshead Center Building and the existing planter
north of the ticket Office,additional landscaping to be
added to the existing planters just north of the north
elevation of the Lionshead Center Building,and major
upgrading of the landscape and plaza area immediately
••
surrounding the skier sculpture at the east entrance of
the Lionshead Mall.While staff is supportive of these
improvements,with minor amendments as suggested by the
Public Works Dept.,with exception to the sculpture
landscape improvements,they are fairly minor amendments
to the Mall.
IV.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
There are two zoning considerations relative to this
application .Number one is the encroachment to the 10-
foot required setback at the west end of the building.
This encroachment is addressed in a separate memorandum
and is accompanying this proposal.The second zoning
consideration which is relative to this proposal is with
respect to parking.Additional parking demand created by
the retail and residential expansions will be assessed and
levied based on square footage added as outlined in the
zoning code .Total figures for the level of expansion
will be determined and resolved by the applicant prior to
issuance of any building permit for new construction.
I VSTAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff is generally supportive of the proposed
redevelopment.We recognize that the existing Lionshead
Center Building leaves much to be desired in an
architectural and urban design context .The retail
expansions in both the north and south elevations are
positive contributions to the Lionshead area.The
landscape improvements proposed by the applicant are also
positive improvements to the Lionshead area.
The landscape improvements do not,however,resolve our
concerns with the treatment of the west elevation.We
feel that the existing landscaping provides a better urban
design solution to that portion of the Lionshead Mall than
the proposed architectural features of the two-and-a-half
story addition.While the improvements made to the
existing landscaping in the Mall are positive,we feel
they do not mitigate the loss of the landscaping at the
west end of the Lionshead Center Building.
The Community Development Department must recommend denial
of this project as it is proposed.We feel that a better
solution must be reached for the west elevation of this
building before we can support this redevelopment.
....•
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
June 25,1987
Tom Briner
Briner-scott Architects
i43 East Meadow Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
RE:Lionshead Centre Building
Dear Tom,
•
office01 community development
This is a summary of comments and concerns raised during the
latest Community Development Department review of the Lionshead
Centre proposal.
The foremost issue that we have with this project is the impact
of development of the northwest portion of the site.As you are
aware,the area between Lionshead Centre and the Gondola
Building is the gateway between Lionshead and the mountain.We
feel that the design of this portal area should reinforce the
interaction of Lionshead and the mountain and should encourage
pedestrian traffic flow.
In 'our review of the proposal,we believe that the building mass
on the northwest portion of the site negativly impacts this
concept.If the building corner was stepped back considerably
in this area we feel there would be a much improved presentation
of the mountian and lift service area to the approaching
pedestrian.At present the existing landscaping serves as an
effective buffer in this transition area,especially as compared
to the ornamental landscaping found throughout the mall.
••
other comments that were discussed in review of the site were
questions regarding the specific architecture of the addition,
on the purpose and appearance of the sky lights,questions
regarding the individuality of the store fronts,and whether or
not the re will be any stone work or planters relating to the
area north of the addition.These are of course seconda ry
issues that can be addressed in greater detail as the project
progress.For now the resolution of the treatment of the
northwest area of the building remains the greatest issue
regarding the staff position of this proposal.
If you have any questions please feel free to conta ct me.
•
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
May 13,1987
Mr.Tom Briner
Briner Scott Architects
143 East Meadow Drive
vail,Colorado 81657
Re:Lionshead Center Building
Dear Tom:
•
officeof community development
In your letter dated May 8,1987,you asked if you would be
required to obtain a setback variance,as you are proposing to
encroach 5 feet into the existing 10 foot setback.The answer
is yes,it is necessary to obtain a setback variance.However,
I believe Rick has already pUblished for the setback variance
request.Enclosed are the two published descriptions for the
project.If you feel that you are asking for more than the
original exterior alteration and setback variance,it would be
necessary to pUblish again.I have enclosed a Planning
Commission schedule that lists submittal deadlines and
meetings.Please be sure to keep these submittal deadlines in
mind if you are asking for variances beyond your original
request.
In respect to the architectural canopy,it is also necessary to
have the various Town departments approve the 2.5'-3.5'
encroachment on Town of Vail property.This encroachment would
be addressed at the Planning Commission level.The staff would
also present the encroachment request to the Town Council at a
work session for their review.
In addition,if your project is not approved by the November
deadline,I think you should resubmit an exterior alteration
proposal.At that time,a year will have passed since your
original submittal.It would be helpful as well as reasonable
to confirm that the project is still active.The submittal
••
deadline is November 30,1987.If the project is still
underway,you may simply re-submit the same application
materials.
Please call me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
~i~~r\:r
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
Enclosure
•
75 south frontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
March 4,1987
Mr.Tom Briner
Briner Scott Architects
143 East Meadow Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Re:Lionshead Center Building.
Dear Tom:
•
officeof community development
I believe I can speak for our department as a whole in sharing
your desire to see an upgrade to the Lionshead Center Building.
I have no argument with your description of the existing
situation.This morning myself and the rest of the staff
discussed at length your correspondence of February 23rd along
with your current design proposal for Lionshead Center Building .
There is flexibility in our attitude regarding the existing
landscaping and the current design proposal and I feel that there
is some common ground that is attainable through a compromise.In
our review today we were able to identify several areas of
potential compromise between our position and the current design
program.I would like to set up an appointment with you to
discuss those specifics.
In order to facilitate our review process of the program,there
are several things that would assist us.The first would be
sUbmitting the model so that we may review the design impacts
through the model as well as the existing drawings.
A second area of information that would be extremely helpful to us
would be information on both the immediate and more long range
plans Vail Associates has for the existing ticket offices,the
Gondola Building,and the property to the south and southwest of
the Lionshead Center Building.I know this information is
difficult to obtain,but I would encourage you to provide us with
as much of this as possible.
••
In conclusion,I think we have identified some areas where there
can be flexibility in our position.In order to reach a
compromise,there will need to be some flexibility in the design
program.If the current proposal is an abso lute,I don't fe el it
will have adequately addressed our concerns.Iam hopeful that we
can corne to an agreement in these areas and proceed with the
development of this project.
Sincerely,
Ric~~an
Town Planner
RP:br
briner,/scott
architects
143 e.meadowdr.
vail.colorado81657
(303)476·3038
•
February23,1987
Mr.Peter Patten,Director
Community Development
Town ofVail
75 S.Frontage Road
Vail,Colorado 81657
Dear Peter:
•
I believe you share with me a desire toseea substantial upgrade
of the LionsheadCentre Building.The existing retail presentation
to the Mall is unattractive,if not uninviting,and the character
oftheLionshead Mall suffers accordingly.
Followingour work session meetingwith the Planning Commission on
February23rd,I was left with the impression thatthat groupand
your staff generally remain supportive ofexpanding retail into
the Mall butyou will notagreetoaplan that eliminates trees -
these being at the westendof the building.
Although it apparently has labeled me asbeing against nature thus
in the camp of nuclear waste spillers,Pront Range water grabbers
etc.etc.,Ihave recommended the elimination of the trees because
I believe the results inthe context oftheLionshead Mall problems,
areworth it.I mean this intermsof visual values aswellas
economic ones.As I told the Commission unless adevelopment
"package"canbe made reasonably attractive toa potential developer
there is no reason why the developer shouldlookto exceptionally
high construction costs,possibly continuing strife withacondo-
minium association,protracted negotiations with lessees,further
meetingswithPlanning Commission andDRB,andthe associated design
timeand fees unless there is somepossibtltty that there canbea
return on his investment.
The present scheme proposes approximately 4,000sq.ft.of additional
retail adjacent the Mall.To save the trees would require the
elimination .of .over ..1,600sq.ft.of this plan ~'or a40%reduction
of possible added retail area.The support of the proposal,by Vail
Associates,is duetoour inclusion ofaSki School Ticket outlet
on the Mall.This would be lost if we are to keep the trees.Further
VA wishestoupgrade its ·Childrens'Cente r·at the lower level ,By
keepingthe trees we would lose 44%of what we had gained with our
expansionplans for this level .Remember,we're already to the
property line onthe south and the parkinggarage is tothe east,thus
there is no other way to expand this faci 1 t ty,
To reducethe potential for expansion by 40%in my mind putsthe
project in jeopardy consequently killing the prospects for an improved
Mall.Also lost is an opportunity for a terrific "public square"at
theterminusoftheMall,within the space between the westendof
•Mr.Peter Patten
February23,1987
Page Two
•
Alfie Packersand the ramp tothegondola .I don't think it should
bean either/or issue of trees vsdevelopment.(Although it's
obviousto many ofus that you're a good guy if you saveorpl ant a
tree anda bad guy if you suggest building anything in this town).
Rather the question shouldbe:are the present trees in the best
location from anurbandesign point of view?They are now perceived
as necessary (a)because they're of reasonable size,and(b)because
theyhidea less than attractive building facade.Not as obvious,
butas greatly appreciated,is that these trees also take up space
and possibly what is most negative aboutLionshead is the amount of
open,unoccupiedspace that tends to separate buildings rather than
connect them ala Vail Village.We proposeto replace the trees with
activities that will generate pedestrian motion-with the belief
that this pedestrianization is of more value at that location than
trees.We believe the trees would beof more valuein another
location -as part of the transition between the landscape of the
Mall and the soft sc ape to the south,below the gondola ramp.
In summary I'm afraid unless there is some flexibility in attitude
regarding these trees that will allow for greater utilization of
the retail development potential,there very ,}ikelywi ll be no
project at all.Ilookforwardtoany suggestions youoryour staff
may have.
Yours truly,
Tff'tN
Thomas A.Briner
BRINER/SCOTT ARCHITECTS
TAB:ka
cc:Eustaquio Cortina
Oscar Tang
David Lindsay
RicardoEversbusch
brrecscott
architects
143e.meadowdr.
vail.colorado81657
(303)476 ·3038
•
May 11,1987
Mr.Rick Pylman
Community Development Dept.
Town ofVail
75 S.Frontage Rd .
Vail,Co.81657
Re :Lionshead Centre-Site PlanRevision
Dear Ri ck:
•
Enclosed are three copiesofa revised site plan for Lionshead
Centre.I believe these changes reflect our discussion ofApril
23rd.Note please that the turning radii we have indicated are
greater thanthose "minimum design requirements"provided by the
Vail Fire Department.We frankly couldnotunderstandthe
relationship of front and rear overhang data relative tothe turn-
ing radius for outside and inside wheels.Thus we have used
information from Architectural GraphicStandards for semi trucks
45'long and these requirements would appeartoexceed those from
fire department.
Also we've indicated a reduction ofthe stair width at thewest
end to make room for more planting.My opinionremains unchanged
regard ing theimportanceof this stair beingbroad and inviting
butIguess we must bow tothe tree enthusiasts on this issue.
Incheckingagainthe quality and quantity of existing plant
materials;the grass patch at the NW corner seems to have three
evergreens that couldbe transplanted.Of the two cottonwoods
(I thirk)theone nearest tothe building i s possibly so close
asto affect its health or do damage tothe building,the other
may be"pot bound"since its growing outof planter above base-
ment space.Withinthe larger planting areatothewest there
are five evergreens -one may be diseased -andI believe they
all could be transplanted .I would begladto get anopinion on
all this from a local nurseryman if you believe it necessary.
Looking at landscape from an arithmetic view point this scheme
would "lose"ten existing trees through construction of this
proposalbut add anet amount of fourteen overthe present number.
As the staff was seekinga point of compromise regarding landscape
and fire accessI believe this revision does that.I hope you will
agree.
Ilookforwardtohearing from you.
•
Mr.Rick Py1man
May 11,1987
Page Two
Yours truly,
TlfM/
Thomas A.Briner
TAB/sw
cc:Oscar Tang
EstachioCortina
Enclosures:three
•
May 12,1988 ••LIONSHEAD CENTRE BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS
1)GRFA INCREASE:Unit 209 383 square feet
Unit 208 301 square feet
Unit 308 196 square feet
Mgrs Unit 272 square feet
TOTAL GRFA 1152 square feet
2)OPEN SPACE (Landscaped):
29 %excluding restaurant deck
32 %with restaurant deck
3)LIONSHEAD CENTRE PLANNING STUDY:OUTLINE OF RELATIONSHIP TO
VAIL LIONgHEAD 'DESIGN :~UIDE :PLAN "
I Re:Subareaconcepts
A.Lionshead Centre t1a11
Item10-Extensive tree planting is proposed:
1.At east entry mallbehind existing sculpture
to form appropriate background
2.At two added planters flanking view to VA ticket
sa1es bu i1ding
3.As an addition to existing planter southof
Clock Tower Square
4.Ina large stepped planter westofproposal new
stair toChair8(approximately 20 trees in this
location
Item 11 -A staggered one story expansionof existing retail
will strengthen axis ofmall and provide pedestrian
interest.Thisproposedexpansionfollows recommend-
ation .·of the "Improve Vail:Vail Lionshead Urban Design
Pl an".
Item 12 Proposed expansion provides mall entry to public restauran
opportunity for organization ofsignage and improved
presentation of retail activity.
B.South Mall Entry-no concepts indicated
Proposed Considerations:
1.At present west and south faces of Lionshead CentreBuilding
seem detached from mall.
a.Opportunity is missedtoprovide pedestrian exposure
to retail and restaurant activities
.b.lt is presently difficult to draw pedegtrians/patrons
toany activity at thelower level
Proposed solutions to above envisions "wrapping"architecture
of Mall aroundnorthwest corner to terminate at open deck
overlooking alower terrace with associated skiing and ski
school activities.The ideabehinda broad stair connecting
mall and lower terrace is toprovidea visible invitation
May 12,1988
Page Two ••
to activities planned for thelower level.These include a
"childrens center",expectedtodoublein size and use,aswell
as greater focusonChair8.The scale ofthe stair is considered
appropriate tothe scale ofthe two spaces it connects and is
not necessarily sized for the number ofpeople who at anytime
may beusing it.It is considered an important landscape
feature.
II Re:Vail
A.
A.l
A.2
Lionshead Design Considerations
Height and Massing
Proposed Mall expansion presents a staggered edgetothe
Mall with shop entrances recessed in display bays providing
pedestrian focus ,on retail activity and away from upper
building heights.
Expansion is generally one story.It is proposed at the
west end to add 2.5 stories in order to mitigate the abrupt
end ofthe existing building.This addition will have
large windows from residential spaces facing theclock
tower.
Story height will be defined by a sloping roof with pitch
and materials matching present building.
Variation of massing is accomplished by staggering the
Mall facade,thus avoiding the monotony ofa continuous
one story expansion.
B.Roofs '
B.l Roof of proposed Mall expansion is approximately 3~:12 pitch
and matches existing building.Roof over restaurant expansion
(Phase2)will be flat with membrane roofing material.'
,B.2 Material,color and pitch ofproposed roof will match existing
building.
To avoida "tacked-on"look theroof facing the Mall will
have dormers aligning with existing window recesses thus
following the ~hythm and texture provided by the present
module andfacade relief presented by the window recesses
andbalcony projections.
,B.3 Roof pitch is 3~:12
B.4 Roof overhangs will be minimum above display windows but
approximately·3.5 feet at recessed shop entrances.
,B.5Asuspended6 1 wide transparent canopy is beingproposed
at the Mall entrance to the restaurant.'
B.6 At theeave 'of the staggered roof will bea colored metal
flat roof/gutter to collect melted snow from new roof ,as well
as existing upper roofs.Wide gutters will be drained with
roof drains and interior leaders.
(Presently,falling snow,waterandice have caused some
pedestrian problems and have caused unsightly staining
of exterior siding.The proposed addition seeksto alleviate
these probl ems).
B.7 The roof material will be cedar shingles ormetal standing
seam to match color of existing roofs.
May 12,1988
Page Three ••
C.Facades -wall/structure
C.1 It is proposed that concrete,glass,metal and tile will
betheprimary materials.
C.2 The predominentfacade color will be white.Exposed
columns may be concrete stained orofa tile to match
base material beneath all windows.
C.3 Tile,if used,may beina darker earth tone,suchas
sierra.
C.4 It is intended that materials and colors bekepttoa
minimum with retail display being highlighted through
the large expanseof windows togive color and liveliness
tothefacadeandthe pedestrian experience.
D.Facades-transparency
0.1 Ground floor commerica1 facades will bepredominantly
glass.
0.2 Window sills are proposedtobe approximately 16"above
0.3 grade.Tile is proposedas ~aterial between sill and
0.4 sidewalk.
0.5 To extent possible auniform basic module for glazing will
be established with individual shops possibly addingor
subtracting muntins and mullions toor from the module
in order toachievean orderly variety of window treatment.
0.6 With recessed entries toshops there will bethe effect
of"bay windows"at these locations.No other projections
are possible giventhe location ofthe property line.
D.?Clear glass is theproposed glazing material.
0.8 All entry doors are proposedwith full length glass lites
E.Decks and Patios
E.lA vital part of this scheme is thedeckproposed at thenorth
E.2 east corner of project.This location has increased the
visibility,access,and enticement from the present deck.
It is hoped that this will become an active stage with
its spirit spilling overto .the stair below where people
may also sit or stretch out inthesun,eat their sacklunch
or just waitandwatch for peoplewhileenjoyingtheviews
tothe south.
F.Accent ·Elements
F.1 Awnings are considered as part ofthefacade facing south
andwest.To more deliberately indicate theskischooland
Chi1drensCenter location off thelower terrace,flags or
other mobile features may be incorporated at the bottom of
the stair.
.'/
c.
(
••
C OI>l.\1 E RCIAL C OR E j (C C2)DI ST RI CT
plan and de sign c onsidera tio ns s ha llb eo n me i nt hec orn-
mun ity d evelopm ent d epartme nt of t he to wn .
B.Revi si ons to the V ail Vi llage ur ban de signgu idepl an a nd
de sign consid erat ions shallb e r eviewed by th ep lanning an d
environm ent al co mmission w ith offic ial act ion to b e t ak en
by the to wn co uncil by r esolution o n a semian nual basi s to
e ns ure t hat th ep lanr eflects the purposesan d intent for
which ith as bee n ado pted.The revie w an d act ion shallt ake
place wit hin th irty d ays fo llow ing the p ublic hearing o nth e
appl ic ations.
(Ord ,21 (1 980)§I (pa rt j.)
Chapt er 18.26
CO~L\lERCIAL CORE 2 lCC 2)DISTRICT
I"'-.-
Sections:
18 .26.0 I0
18 .26.0:W
18 .26.030
18 .26.040
18.26.045
18 .26 .050
18.26.060
18.26 .070
18.26 .090
18 .26 .100
18.26.120
18 .26 .140
18.26 .150
18.26 .160
18.26 .1 SO
Pu rp ose.
Requirements for establishnlent-Development
plan.
Permitted and conditional u ses.
Conditi onal uses -Generally .
Exteri or alt erati on s or modificat ions-
Pr ocedure.
Access ory uses .
Lot area and s ite dimensions.
Setbacks.
He ight .
Density control .
Coverage.
Land scaping and s ire development.
Parking and lo adin g.
Locruion of business activity .
Adup ricn of Li ou shcad ur ban d esign gui de plan
and design c ousidcrations.
3 53 (\'.111:XII
~t .•
•
lOt\'ING
•..
\•
~~
18.:!6.0 10 Purpose .
Th ec om mercial core :2 di stri ct is in ten de d t o p ro vide s ites
f or a mi xtu re o f mu ltiple d wellings,lodge s a ndc om m ercial
est ablishm entsi na clust ered.un ifi ed d evelopm ent.C omm er cial
core :!d istri ct in accord ance w ith t he V 3i1 Li on she ad u rban
d es ign gui de p lan and de signc ons iderati on sis intend ed to
en s ure a de quate li ght,a ir,ope n space and ot h er a me nities
a p pro pri ate to th e p ermitted t yp es of buil dinga ridu sesa nd to
maint ain t he d esirable q ualiti es of the d istrict by es tablishing
ap propriate site developm en t standards ,(Ord .21 (19 80)§2
(part).)
18.26 .0:!O Requirements f or es t:Jblish me nt -
D evel opment pl an.
A .Pri or t o t hees tab l ishmen t o f a ny com me rcial co re 1 d istri ct
or en la rgeme nt of a ny existing com me rcial co re :2 d istri ct by
ch ange of d istrict boundaries ,th e to wn council sha ll by
r es olu ti on a d opt a ge neral d evelo pmentp lanf or th e
prop os ed d istrict.Th e ge nerald evelopm en t p lan ma y be
prepa red by a n a pplicant f or th ees tablis hme nt of such
d istri ct or may be prepared by the town.The developm ent
p lan s ha ll b e subm itt ed t o the p lanning comm iss ion f or
r eview,a nd t he p lanning commission sha ll submit its
findings and r ecommendations on the p lan to the t ow n
council.
B.The d evelopment plan shall show the following
info rma tio n:
I.E xisti ng top ography and tree c over:
2.Pr oposed d ivision of the area into lots o rb uilding s ites ,
and the pro posed u sc's tobe e stablished on each s ite;
3.Pr oposed lo catio ns.d im ensi on s,and h eights of b uildings
on each site.and th e l ocation s o f parking an d loading
are as,aCCLOSS d rives .principal public"and private ope n
spaces ,a nd o the r site p l a n f eatures:
4 .R elat ionship of p ropo sed de velo pme nt un t he si te t o
d evelopm e nt Oil :Il l j o in i n ~si tes;
S .Such arldit ion .rl in form a tion ;IS the pbllllill~comm ission
and town council dam nece ssary to guide de ve lopm ent
w ithin the proposl'd district.
354
r
I
355
CO~l:-'l EI ~CI AI CORE ~(CC2)DISTRICT
C.T he deve lop men t p lan s hal l he use d asag uide for the s ubse-
quent development of sit.:,and t he de sign rind location of
buildings an d g roundsw ithin t he di stric t.A ll plans subse-
qu en t ly approved by th e dl:s ign r e view h oa rd in acc ordance
with Chap ter I ~.54 s hall s uhst aruiu l ly c on for m w itht he
developm en t pl an adopted by t he t o wn cou ncil.
(Ord .R(1<)73)§9 .:100 .)
18.26.030 P ermi tted an d co ndi t iona l uses.
I n the CC2 d is trict.pe rmi tted a mi co ndi tiona l uses for
specific floors s hall be the same as t ho s epe rmitted i n t he
commercial core Idi strict ;"p rcxc ribed by Sec tio ns18.24 .U20
t hro uuh 18.24.U50.Retail stores and establishmen ts sha ll not
OCCUp)·more t h an eig ht thousand s quare feet of floor a rea .(Ord .
50(1970)§7 :O rd.~(197 3 )§9 .300.)
1 8 .26.0~0 C ondi tional uses-G enerally.
T he follow ing co nd itional uses shall be pe rmitte d,s ubject t o
is su anceo f a conditi on al u se per mitin a ccordance with the
p ro vis ions of C h ap ter18.60:
A .S ki lifts an d tows;
.B.Pu blic utili ty an d p ublic s ervice uses ;
C.P ub lic bui ldings,grounds ,an d fac ilities;
D.Public park an d rec re ati on fa cilities:
E .The aters,m e etin g ro oms a nd conve n tio nf acilit ies;
F.C oin -operated l aund r ies:
G .C omm erc ial storage-as long as it is a t base ment level an d
d oes not have a ny exter ior frontage on any pu blic way.str eet.
w alk wayo r m all area .
(Ord .21(1 983)§I :O rd .8(1981)§2 (p art):O rd .5 0(1 978)§S:
Ord.8 (1 973)§9 .400.)
1 8 .26.0~5 Ext e rior a lters ti ons or m odifies ti ons-Pr oc edure.
All al teratio ns of t heex terior o f a n ex isting b uildingin eC2
s hall comp ly w itht he follow ing proced ure :
A .T he altera tion of an exi st ing building w hich adds or r emoves
a ny enclosed floo r area or the replace ment of an e xisting
(V .i1II·'~-8 )1
[.,
••
ZO :-l ING
bu ild ing s hall be subject to review b y the pl anning a nd
environmental commis sion a s fo ll o ws:
I.A pplication s hallbe mad e by the o wner of th e b uild ingo r
h isag e nt o n afo rm providedby th e zon inga dmin ist rat or:
2.The he aringb e for et hep l anning a nd e n v ir o nme ntal
commission s hallb e held in a ccor da nce with S ec tio ns
18.66.0 60t hro ugh J 8 .66.090.A de c isio n 0 1 the p lann in g
a nd envi ro nme ntal c om m is sionm ay be a ppea led to t he
town co uncilin a ccordance w ith th e proc edure s pecifi e d
inSe ction18.60 .0 70:
3 .It sh a llb e t he burd en of the ap plica ntu nd e rs ubsection A
to prove by a prep on derance o fth e evid ence before t he
p lanning a nden viro nment alc om miss ion th at t he pro-
p osed b uildin g a lte rati o nisin co m pliance wit h the
p u rposes o f th e CC2 dist rict a s s p ec ified in18.26.0 10:and
tha t th e proposal complies w ith t he Vail L ionsheud ur ban
des ign gu ide p lan and design cons iderun ons or t ha t t he
pro posa ld oes no t o t herw ise alte rt hech aracter o t t he
n eig hb o rho od:
4.The p lanning a nd e nv ironm e nta lc om mission may ap -
provet he ap plication as s u bm itt e d.a pprove th e a ppl ica -
tion wi thco n dit ions or m odifi cation s,o r.if t hep lanning
a nd e nviro nme ntal comm issio n f inds t hat th e applicant
failed to mee t h is bu r de n of pr oo f.i t may den y t he
a pplication:
5.A pplic atio ns fo r this subsec tio n ,\s hall be s u bmitted
s e m iannu ally o n or befo re t he fo urth :-'1o nduy of \la y and
Novem ber .T he plan n in g a nd e nvironm ent al commiss ion
shall th en hold a prelim inary re view -ess ion wi thin
t wenty-one davs of the above s ubm itta l da le ..-\p ublic
hear ing s hall the n be hel d wi thin si xtv day s o f th e
pr clinunarv rev iew session .For projects wh ich a rc d eem ed
by t he commissio n 10 consuuue a ma jor amendment to
t h ea p proved Vuil l .ion shcad urb an de siu n gui de'p ian or
ut h crwi se co nsututc a sig mficant im pact «n th e t ll"n .a
ninet y-day s tudv p eriod rn av h ere quested h v the pl.mruru;
c o mm is sion .pr ior 10 a lin al d isp osui on <,I s uch p roiccr s.
a.N otwitb staudi ru;t h e r orc gn inu ,a pphcauons tor \!H:
a lterat ion of a n c xist nu;hu ildi ng which .uld "I
-:
\..
r
(
••
CO:VU...1E;ZC IAL CORE 2 (CC2\DI STRICT
remove an ye n closed floor are a of not more than one
hun dr ed square feet may be s ubmi tted a t the r equ ired
ti me of the m onth fo r plan ning c om miss ion review .
The review proced ures shall .i na ll resp e cts.be the
same :!S th at f or o ther a p plicationsin acc or dance w ith
th iss ection .A ll e nclosed floor area for a ne xpansion
or dele tion p ur s uant t o this s ub paragraph a .s hall be
physically a nd s t r u ct urallya part of a n exis ting or
new build ing ana sh ailn ot b e a free -sta nd ing s truc-
t ure,Asi ngle prope rty owner s halln otbepe rmitted
more than o ne s ubmissionin acco rdance with this
s ub parag raph a.in an y two y earp eriod.A pro perty
ow ner m ay ,howeve r,a pply for a n expansion g reate r
than o ne hundred sq uare fee t in any year in which he
submits his applicatio n o n the May and N ove rnber
da tes se t f orth i n paragraph A.5.
6.A pp l icat ions f or this s u bsection As hall bes ub mitted.
fo r 1984 onl y,after the effect ive date of the ordinance
r evising these subm ittal deadli nes u ntil April 2~.1984
a nd o nt he fou rth Mond ay in M aya nd Nove mber,
B.The modi fic ation o r ch a nge to the ex t erio r fac ade of a
bui ldin g on as ite w ithin CC 2 s h a llber eviewedby t he des ign
re view b oardi n acco r dance w itht he f ollowing:
I .A pplicat ions s hall be made by the ow ner of the bu ilding
o rhi s agent o n a fo rm provided by t he zoning
adrn in istra to r ;
')T he hearing before th e de s ign review boa rd s hall be h eld
in acco rdan ce with Chapte r \8.54 .A deci sion of t he
d esig n review bo a rd may b e appealed to t he to wn
c ou n cil i n accordance w i th t he procedure spec ifiedill
Chap ter 1X.5 4,
3 ,I t s hall be th e burden o f the a pplicant t o p rove by a
p repon dera nce of the evide nce b efore the d esign review
hoa rd tha t the proposed hu ildinu m odification isi n
c omplia n ce w ith the p urpo se s of t he l 'C ~dis tric t as
,.;pt:c llic d in I S,~4,O I 0 :th at th e pro posa l su bs t.i nt i ullv
co mpl ivs w ith t he \'.lil l.io ush ca d des i~n considera tions
o r th at the pr opo sal doe s I IO (oth erwise al ter the c har-
ac ter of t h e:n eruhborh ood :
".-
r-
1......-
'-.,
~~:~~.•'J
••
ZONING
4.The design review board may approve the application as
submitted,approve the application with condi tions or
modifications,or,if the design review board finds that
the applican t failed to meet his burden of proof,it may
deny t he application;
5.The zoning administrator may approve minor rnodifi -
cations as provided in Section 18 .54 .060.A decision of
the zoning administrator may be appea led to the de sign
review board for review .
C.All alterations under subsection A above shall be subj ect to
review by the design review board follo wing planning a nd
e nvironmenta l commission 's a pp r oval in acco raance with
Chapter 18 .54.The design review board shall review the same
to ensure that the same complies with the VailL ionshead
urban design considerations .
(Ord.7(1984)§1:Ord .41(19 83)§1:Ord.25 (1982)§Ie :Ord .
21(1980)§2 (part).)
18 .26.050 Accessory uses.
The fo llowing accessory us es sha ll be permi tted in t he CC2
district:
A .Swimming pool s,tennis co urts,patios or other recreation
facilities c ustomarily incid enta lt ope rmitted resid ent ial or
lodge u ses;
B.Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunct ion with permitted
eating and drinking e st ab lishm ents:
C.H ome occupat ions,subj ect t o iss uance o f a h orne occupation
permit in a ccorda neew ith the pr ovi sions of Sec t ions I S.58.I JO
through 18.5 8.190:
D.Dthe;uses cu stomar ilv inci d ent al and a ccess ory t o perm itted
orc ondit iona l u ses .and nccc s-ary for t he o pe ra tion t here of.
E .Min or arcad e.Amu sement de vices shall n ot b e \isihlc ''T
aud ible from pub lic way .s tree t .walkway or ma ll a rea .
(O rd.6(19!;2)§.ta :Ord .S(19 7:1 )~().500)
IVsd lS-l -X4 )
.~
..
••
CO~I~I ER CIA L C ORE 2 (CC2)DISTRICT
not exceed t wenty-five dwelling units per acre of buildables ite
a rea.(Ord .2 1(1980)§2 (part).)
18.26.120 Coverage.
Not more t h an seve nty p ercent of th e t otal s ite area s hallbe
co vered b y bui ldings unlesso the rwise sp ecifiedin the Va il
L ionshead u rban de signg uidepl an a ndde sign considerations.
(Ord .21(1980 )*2 (pa rt j .)
13.26.140 Landscaping and s ite development,
A tleast twenty pe rcent o f the to tal si te a rea sh allb e
land scaped un lesso the rwis e s pecified in the VailLi onshead
urban desi gn guidep lana nd desig nc onsiderat ions.IO rd.2 1(19l\0)
§2 (p aru .)
18.26 .150 Parking ami loading.
Off-street p arking and lo ading s hallbe provided in accord-
an ce wi th Ch ap ter 13.52 .At leas t o ne-hal f th er eq uired p arking
s hallbe locatedw ith in t he m ain bu ildingo r b uildings.Xopa rking
or loading areas hall b e lo ca ted i n a ny re quired fro nt se tback a rea.
(Ord.8(1973)§9 .610 .)
13.26 .160 Locution ofbu siness ucrivity.
A .All o ffices,bu sinessesa nd s e rvices pe rmittedb vSe ction
I S.2 6 .(S)sha llbe opera ted an d conduc ted c ruirc lvw ithin a
building.ex cept for p e rmitt ed unencl osed parking or loading
area sa ndth eo ut doo r d isplay of g oo ds,
B.The area to h e us ed for ou t du or d isp la y must he located
dir ectly in f ro III ot 't he esta hl is hrncn t display ing th e g oods and
enti rely up on t he es t ab lis hme nt's own property'.Sidewalks .
b uilding e ntrance s an d ex its.d rivc wavs a nd s treets shall not
beob struct ed h v outd oor d ispla\',.
(Oru ..1 4(I 'JX21 ~2:O ru .X(1')7.1)~9 .1>1 1.1
.\.•"I 4 -1111
.......-
/-,
'--
••
ZOI'ING
13.26.180 Adoption of Lionshead urban design guide plan and
design considerations.
A .The Vail lions head urban desi gn guid e plan and des ign
considerations a re a dopted fo r t he pur p o se o f mai nt a ining
and pre serving the c ha rac ter a n d vi tality o iVail Li o nsh ea d
(CC2)and to guide the iuture alteration s.change a nd
improvement in the CC2 d istr ict.C op ies oi th e Va ilLi onsh ead
u rband esig ng uidep ian a nd d esig n co ns iderati ons sh all be o n
rile in the community de ve lopm e nt d epart m ent o f t he 10 \\n .
B.R evi s ions t oth e V ail Lionsh cad u rba n dc siun ;.!u ide p lan an d
de sig n consi d erations shall be revie we d by the plun nine .i nd
e nviron ment a l co mmissio n wi t h off i cia l action to he t ake n
byt he t o wnco u n c il b y r eso lution o n a sem iannual basis to
e nsureth at t hep lan reflects t he purposes an d in tent fo r
whi c hith as been ado pted .T he revie w a nd ac t ion s h all t;lke
pl ace within thirt y days fo llo win g t he p ublic i ie a ring o n t il,'
a p p li cati ons.
(Ord .21 (1 98 0)§~(part).)
Cha pt er I S.27
Cmt~tERCIAL COR E 3 (C Cl DI STRICf
'.
Sections :
18.2 7 .010
18.27.030
1S.27.Q-t2
18 .27.050
18.27.060
18.27.070
18.27.080
18.27 .090
1S.27.1 00
18.27.110
18.27 .120
Pcnnit t ed u ses.
Condi tional uses .
Access ory u ses.
Lot ar ea and s it c dimensions ,
S et backs.
Hci~11.
Den sity control.
Co verage.
Landscapinu a nd sire dcvclupmcnr .
Parking and !o3ding.
Locati on of hu sincss act ivitv .
May 12,1988 ••LIONSHEAD CENTRE BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS
1)GRFA INCREASE:Unit 209 383 square feet
Unit 208 301 square feet
Unit 308 196 square feet
Mgrs Unit 272 square feet
TOTAL GRFA 1152 square feet
2)OPEN SPACE (Landscaped):
29 %excluding restaurant deck
32 %with restaurant deck
3)LIONSHEAD CENTRE PLANNING STUDY:OUTLINE OF RELATIONSHIP TO
VAIL LIONgHEAD 'DEgIGN :~UIDE :PLAN "
I Re:Subarea concepts
A.Lionshead CentreHall
Item10-Extensive tree planting is proposed:
1.At east entry mallbehind existing sculpture
to form appropriate background
2.At two added planters flanking viewto VA ticket
sales building
3.As an addition to existing planter southof
Clock Tower Square
4.Ina large stepped planter westofproposal new
stair toChair 8 (approximately 20 trees in this
location
Item 11 -A staggered one story expansionof existing retail
will strengthen axis ofmall and provide pedestrian
interest.Thisproposedexpansionfollows recommend-
at tonof the "Improve Vail ':Vail Lionshead Urban Design
Pl an"•
Item 12 Proposed expansionprovidesmall entry to public restaurar
opportunity for organization ofsignage and improved
presentation of retail activity.
B.South Mall Entry-no concepts indicated
Proposed Considerations:
1.At present west and south faces of Lionshead Centre Building
seem detached from mall.
a.Opportunity is missedtoprovide pedestrian exposure
to retail and restaurant activities
b.It is presently difficult to draw pedestrians/patrons
toany activity at thelower level
Proposed solutions to above envisions "wrapping"architecture
of Mall around northwest corner to terminate at open deck
overlooking alower terrace with associated skiing and ski
school activities.The ideabehindabroad stair connecting
mall and lower terrace is toprovide a visible invitation
14ay 12,1988
Page Two ••
to activities planned for thelower level.These include a
"childrens center".expected todoublein size and use,aswell
as greater focusonChair 8.The scale ofthe stair is considered
appropriate tothe scale ofthe two spaces it connects and is
notnecessarily sized for the number ofpeople who at anytime
maybeusing it.It is considered an important landscape
feature.
II Re:Vail
A.
A.l
A.2
Lionshead Design Conside rations
Hei ght and Massing
Proposed Mall expansion presents a staggered edgetothe
Mall withshop entrances recessed in display bays providing
pedestrian focuson retail activity and away from upper
building heights.
Expansion is generally one story.It is proposed at the
west end to add 2.5 stories in order to mitigate the abrupt
end ofthe existing building.This addition will have
large .windows from residential spaces facing theclock
tower.
Story height will be defined by a sloping roof with pitch
and materials matching present building.
Variation of massing is accomplished by staggering the
Mall facade,thus avoiding the monotony ofa continuous
one story expansion.
B.Roofs
B.l Roof ofproposed Mall expansion is approximately 3 ~:12 pitch
and matches existing building.Roof over restaurant expansion
(Phase2)will be flat with membrane roofing material •.
.B.2 Material,color and pitch ofproposed roof will match existing
building.
To avoida "tacked-on"look the roof facing the Mall will
have dormers aligning with existing window recesses thus
following the rhyth m and texture provided by t he present
module andfacade relief presented by the window recesses
and balcony projections •
.B.3 Roof pitch is 3~:12
B.4 Roof overhangs will be minimum above display windows but
approximately ·3.5 feet at recessed shop entrances.
B.5Asuspended6'wide transparent canopy is beingproposed
at the Mall entrance to the restaurant.·
B.6 At theeave ·of the staggered roof will bea colored metal
flat roof/gutter to collect melted snow from new roof .as well
as existing upper roofs.Wide gutters will be drained with
roof drains and interior leaders.
(Presently,falling snow,waterand ice have caused some
pedestrian problems and have caused unsightly staining
of exterior siding.The proposed addition seeksto alleviate
these problems).
B.7 The r oof material will becedar shingles ormetal standing
seam to match color of existing roofs.
May 12,1988
Page Three ••
C.Facades -wall/structure
C.l It is proposed that concrete,glass,metal and tile will
betheprimary materials.
C.2 The predominent facade color will be white.Exposed
columns may be concrete stained orofa tile to match
base material beneath all windows.
C.3 Tile,if used,may beina darker earth tone,suchas
sierra.
C.4 It is intended that materials and colors bekepttoa
minimum with retail display being highlighted through
the large expanseof windows togive color and liveliness
tothefacade and the pedestrian experience.
D.Facades-transparency
D.1 Ground floor commerical facades will bepredominantly
glass.
D.2 Window sills are proposedtobe approximately 16"above
D.3 grade.Tile is proposed as ~aterial between sill and
D.4 sidewalk...
D.5 To extent possible auniformbasic module for glazing will
be established with individual shops possibly addingor
subtracting muntins and mullions toor from the module
in order toachievean orderly variety of window treatment.
D.6 With recessed entries toshops there will be the effect
of"bay windows"at these locations.No other projections
are possible giventhe location ofthe property line.
D.7 Clear glass is theproposed glazing material.
D.8All entry doors are proposedwith full length glass lites
E.Decks and -Patios
E.l A vital part of this scheme is thedeck proposed at thenorth
E.2 east corner of project •.This location has increased the
visibility,access,and enticement from the present deck.
It is hoped that this will become an active stage with
its spirit spilling overto .the stair below where people
may also sit or stretch outinthesun,eat their sack lunch
or just wait and watch for peoplewhileenjoyingtheviews
tothe south.
F.Accent -Elements
F.l Awnings are considered as part ofthefacade facing south
and west.To more deliberately indicate theskischooland
Chi1drensCenter location off thelower-terrace,flags or
other mobile features may be incorporated at the bottom of
the stair.
---------
May 12,1988 ••LIONSHEAD CENTRE BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND ALTE~ATIONS
1)
2)
GRFA INCREASE:Unit 209 383 square feet
Unit 208 301 square feet
.Unit 308 196 square feet
Mgrs Unit 272 square feet
TOTAL GRFA 1152 square feet
OPEN SPACE (Landscaped):
29%excluding restaurant deck
32 %with r estaurantdeck
3)LIONSHEAD CENTRE PLANNING STUDY:OUTLINE OF RELATIONSHIP TO
VAIL 'LIONSHEAD :DESIGN '3UIDEPLAN '.
I Re:Subareaconcepts
A.Lionshead CentreHall
Item10-Extensive tree planting is proposed:
1.At east entry mallbehind existing sculpture
to form appropriate background
2.At two added planters flanking viewto VA ticket
sales building
3.As an addition to existing planter southof
Clock Tower Square
4.Ina large stepped planter westofproposal new
stair toChair8 (approximately 20 trees in this
location
Item 11 -A staggered one story expansion of existing retail
will strengthen axis ofmall and provide pedestr ian
interest.Thisproposedexpansionfollows recommend-
ationof the "Improve Vail:Vail Lionshead Urban Design
Plan"..
Item12 Proposed expansionprovidesmall entry to public restaurar
opportunity for organization ofsignage and i mproved
presentation of retail activity.
B.South Mall Entry-no concepts indicated
Proposed Considerations:
1.At present west and south faces of Lionshead CentreBuilding
seem detached from mall.
a.Opportunity is missedtoprovide pedestrian exposure
to retail and restaurant activities
b.lt is presently difficult to draw pedestrians/patrons
toany activity at thelower level
Proposed solutions to above envisions "wrapping"architecture
of Mall aroundnorthwest corner to terminate at opendeck
overlooking alower terrace with associated skiing and ski
school activities.The ideabehindabroad stair connecting
mall and lower terrace is toprovidea visible invitation
May 12.1988
Page Two ••
to activities planned for thelower level.These include a
"childrens center".expectedtodoublein size and use.aswell
as greater focusonChair8.The scale ofthe stair is considered
appropriate tothe scale ofthe two spaces it connects and is
not necessarily sized for the number ofpeople who at anytime
may beusing it.It is considered an important landscape
feature.
II Re:Vail
A.
A.1
A.2
Lionshead Design Considerations
Height and Massing
Proposed Mall expansion presents a staggered edgetothe
Mall with shop entrances recessed in display bays providing
pedestrian focuson retail activity and away from upper
building heights.
Expansion is generally one story.It is proposed at the
west end to add 2.5 stories in order to mitigate the abrupt
end ofthe existing building.This addition will have
large windows from residential spaces facing theclock
tower.
Story height will be defined by a sloping roof with pitch
and materials matching present building.
Variation ofmassing is accomplished by staggering the
Mall facade.thusavoidingthe monotony ofa continuous
one story expansion.
B.Roofs
B.1 Roof ofproposed Mall expansion is approximately 3~:12 pitch
andmatches existing building.Roof over restaurant expansion
(Phase2)will be flat with membrane roofing material.'
.B.2 Material.color and pitch ofproposed roof will match existing
building.
To avoida "tacked-on'Took the roof facing the Mall will
have dormers aligning with existing window recesses thus
followingthe rhythm and texture provided by the .present
module andfacade relief presented by the window recesses
and balcony projections.
B.3 Roof pitch is 3~:12
B.4 Roof overhangs will be minimum above display windows but
approximate1y·3.5 feet at recessed shop entrances.
B.5A suspended 6 1 wide transparent canopy is beingproposed
at the Mall entrance to the restaurant.·
B.6Attheeave 'ofthe staggered roof will bea colored metal
flat roof/gutter to collect melted snow from new roof ,as well
as existing upper roofs.Wide gutters will be drained with
roof drains and interior leaders.
(Presently.falling snow.waterand ice have caused some
pedestrian problems and have caused unsightly staining
of exterior siding.The proposed addition seeksto alleviate
these problems).
B.7 'The roof material will be cedar shingles ormetal standing
seam to match color of existing roofs.
May 12,1988
Page Three ••
C.Facades-wall/structure
C.l It is proposed that concrete,glass,metal and tile will
be theprimary materials.
C.2 The predominentfacade color will be white.Exposed
columns may be concrete stained orofa tile to match
base material beneath all windows._
C.3 Tile,if used,may beina darker earth tone,suchas
sierra.
C.4 It is intended that materials and colors bekepttoa
minimum with retail display being highlighted throu~h
the large expanse·of windows togive color and liveliness
tothefacadeandthe pedestrian experience.
D.Facades-transparency
0.1 Ground floor commerica1 facades will bepredominantly
glass.
0.2 Window sills are proposedtobe approximately 16"above
0.3 grade.Tile is proposedas material between sill and
0.4 sidewalk..
0.5 To extent possible auniform basic module for glazing will
be established with individual shops possibly adding or
subtracting muntinsand mullions toor from the module
in order to achieve an orderly variety of window treatment.
0.6 With recessed entries toshops there will bethe effect
of"bay windows"at these locations.No other projections
are possible giventhe location ofthe property line.•
0.7Clear glass is theproposed glazing material.
0.8 ·All entry doorsareproposedwith full length glass lites
E.Decks and Patios
E.1 A vital part of this scheme is thedeckproposed at thenorth
E.2 east corner of project.This location has increased the
visibility,access,and enticement from the present deck.
It is hoped that this will become an active stage with
its spirit spilling overtothe stair below where people
may also sit or stretch outinthesun,eat their sack lunch
or just waitandwatch for peoplewhileenjoyingtheviews
tothe south.
F.Accent Elements
F.l Awnings are considered as part ofthefacade facing south
andwest.To more deliberately indicate theskischooland
Chi1drensCenter location off thelower terrace,flags or
other mobile features may be incorporated at the bottom of
the stair..
•
December 2,1986
Mr.Tom Brown
c/o Town ofVail
Community Development Department
P.O.Box 100
Vail,Colorado 81658
Re:Lionshead CentreBuildingproposed
Dear Tom:
•
Followingare names and addresses of adjacent property owners to
the Lionshead Centre Building.I believe this complieswith re-
quirement No.7 ofthe Application for Exterior Al terations .•..
in Commercial Core IIVail Lionsheadsubmitted No vember 24 .If
you should have any questions please give me a call.
Yours truly,
TtwI
Thomas A.Briner
------------1)Gondola Building:
2)Llonshead Arcade:
3)J ra et-C:
4)racts Band D:
5)Treetops:
Vail Associates,Box 7,Vail 81658
RobertT.and Diane J.lazler
Box 627,Vail 81658
J ownof Va-H,Box 100,Vail 81658
Vail Associates,Box 7,Vail 81658
Pierre La es,3201 South Tamarac Drive
#200,Denver 80231
(
cc:Eustaquio Cortina .,I
S-::l-0 6:-L I \Jh )'..(0-.1 Ct.~1W--e:
.......
"J:.4':'
•-----
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
Mr.Gary swetish
143 East Meadow Drive
vail,Colorado 81657
Dear Gary:
•
officeofcommunity development
March 10,1988
In order to complete the formal submittal requirements for the
Lionshead Centre exterior alteration I will need the following
information:
Complete building elevations
written description of compliance with vail Lionshead Urban
Design Guide Plan
written description of compliance with Vail Lionshead Urban
Design Considerations
written analysis of project impact on zoning issues (grfa,
height,setbacks,etc.)
If this information,along with the revised model,can be submitted
by March 14 the project could be reviewed by the PEC at their
regUlarly scheduled meeting of April 11.
If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at
476-7000.
Sincerely,
~lL?LMAJ
Rick Pylman
Town Planner
brinerscott
architects
143e.meadowdr;
vail.colorado81657
(303)4763038
•
February19,1987
Mr.Rick pylman
Community Development Department
Town ofVail
75 S.Frontage Road
Vail,Colorado 81657
DearRick:
Followingour conversation Wednesday February 18th,I've tried to
address those three items for which you believed was required
further explanation.
If youhaveany questions please give me a call or if this is not
sufficient please contact me.
Thank you,
~1b~o t!WVU ~7m
Thomas A.Briner
TAB:ka
enclosure
cc:Eustaquio Cortina
Oscar Tang
David Lindsay
•February 19,1987 •
1)GRFA INCREASE:Unit 209 686 square feet
Unit 208 284 square feet
Unit 309 513 square feet
Unit 308 196 s quare feet
Mgrs Unit 272 sguare feet
TOTAL GRFA 1951 square feet increase
2)OPEN SPACE (1 andscaped):
29%excluding restaurant deck
32%with restaurant deck
3)LIONSHEAD CENTRE PLANNING STUDY:OUTLINE OF RELATIONSHIP TO
VAIL LIONSHEAD DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
I Re:Subarea concepts:
A.LionsheadCentre Mall
Item 11 -Thisproposal includes expanding existing
commercial approximately 19 feet (to the
property line)into the mall.This addition
is one story withbasement.
Item 12-The proposedexpansion would provideacanopy-
extending overthe property line -to "improve
scale,shelter and appearance"of present
commercial facades.
B.South Mall Entry-no concepts indicated
Proposed Considerati ons:
1.At present thewest and south faces ofLionsheadCentre
building seem detached from mall.
a.Opportunity is missedtoprovide pedestrian exposure
to retail and restaurant activities
b.It is presently difficult to draw pedestrians/patrons
toany activity at thelower level.
Proposed solutions to above envisions "wrapping"arch-
itecture ofmallaroundsouthwest corner to terminate
at open deck overlooking alower terrace with associated
skiing and skischool activities.The ideabehinda
broad stair connecting mall and lower terrace is to
providea visible invitation to activities planned for
thelower level.These include a "childrens center"
expectedtodoublein size and use,aswellas greater
focus on chair 8.The scale ofthe stair is considered
appropriate tothe scale ofthe two spaces it connects
and is not necessarily sized for the number ofpeople
who at any one time may beusing it.On the contrary
it is thoughtofasalandcape feature.
1
February19,
••
II Re:Design Considerations:
A.Heightand Massing
A.l Along the pedestrian edgesofthe building is
proposeda transparent canopy -providing lighting
at night,cover from above and creating a "~destrian
focus"on theshop windows beyond.
A.2 Expansion is generally one story.Atthewestend
it is proposedto rise 3 ~stories to match the height
of the existing building.It is proposed that these
additional stories will have large windows,bay
projections,balconies and awnings that will visually
enliven what is now ablankfacade facing ontothe
most active outdoor winter spaceinLionshead (if not
Va il ).
Story height will be defined bythe color and material
change of the pitched metal roof oftheproposedex-
pansion.(Except at westend where roof of3rd level
will match existing roof).
The "continuous"canopy alongthemall will bebroken
at theapproximate mid point to visually announce an
entry way into a gallery type cross corridor providing
amall entrance tothe restaurant and added retail/
office area.It is proposed at mallshop entries to
further recess the building facadeand define these
points with higher canopiesthus "avoiding the monotony
of a continuous one story expansion".
B.Roofs
B.l The propsedexpansion will havea pitched roof to recall
B.2 lines of existing structure.Where necessary to maintain
B.3views from upper levels there is indicated a flat roof
(primarily on south facade).Attachedtotheone story
pitched roof is proposeda vaulted canopy.Given the
amount of added roof in this proposal we consider that
the various roof focus will add "variety"andnot
"create acumulative business".
B.4 It is proposed that the canopy will overhang approximately
B.54'to 4'-6".Given the height tothelowest point ofthe
canopy,8'-6",we believe this is proportion of overhang,
will providean appropriate sense of enclosure,and
subtle separation from themall proper,while at the same
time allowing reasonable width for passage of fire
vehicles between the canopy edgeand existing planter
boxes on thenorth side ofmall (approximately 17').
B.6 The metal pitched roof proposed will collect meltedand
fallen snow from higher existing roofs and direct any
watertoa gutter,hiddenbehindthecurvedcanopy,that
will havea drainage system integrated into the warm
side of the store front enclosure.
2
February19,
•
1987 •
••
8.7 Our own analysis ofthe existing building's colors
given its location on the northern edgeofthe mall,
where little to no direct sunorsun reflection occurs,
suggests that theproposed addition should itself be
light colored.Consequentlytheproposedmetal roof
shouldbe white.Further those existingvertical surfaces
nearest themallare also being considered as stained
white.The canopy is proposedasa translucent white
plastic with all metal connections and joints also white.
C.Facades -wall/structure
C.1 It is proposed that concrete,glass,metal and tile will
betheprimary materials
C.2 The predominentfacade color will be white.Exposed
columns may be concrete stained orofa tile to match
base material beneath all windows
C.3 Tile,if used,may beina darker earth tone,suchas
sierra or other
C.4 It is intended that materials and colors bekepttoa
minimum with retail display being highlighted through
the large expanseof windows togive color and liveliness
tothefacade and the pedestrian experience.
D.Facades -transparency
0.1 Ground floor commercial facades will bepredominantly
glass
0.2 Wi ndow sill sareproposedtobe approximately 16"above
0.3 grade.Tile is proposedas material between sill and
0.4 side walk.
0.5 To extent possible auniform basic module for glazing
will be established with individual shops either adding
or subtracting muntins and mullions toor from the module
in order toachievean orderly variety of window treatment
0.6 With recessed entries toshops there will bethe effect
of"bay windows"at these locations.No other projections
are possible giventhe location ofthe property line.
0.7Clear glass is theproposed glazing material
0.8All entry doorsareproposedwith full length glass lites
E.Decks and Patios
E.1 A vital part of this scheme is thedeckproposed at thenorth
E.2 east corner of project.This location has increased the
visibility,access,and enticement from the present deck.
It is hoped that this will become an active stage with
its spirit spilling overtothe stair below where people
may also sit or stretch outinthesun,eat their sack
lunchor just wait and watch for peoplewhile enjoying the
views tothe south.
F.Accent Elements
F.1 Awnings are considered as part ofthefacade facing south
and west.To more deliberately indicate theskischooland
Childrens Center location off thelower terrace,flags or
other mobile features may be incorporated at thebottomof
the stair.
3
..•February19,1987
.,•
We believe table umbrellas would be quite appropriate on
theproposed restaurant deck.A large terraced planter
is proposedtoanchorthe stair.Althoughproposedto
contain trees,groundcovercouldbea variety of per-
ennial andannual plantings.Withinthe canopy is the
opportunity for a variety of lighting:indirect and
ambient that would light themallaswellas direct that
couldfocus on store graphics or display.
4
••VAIL FIRE DEPARIMNET
•
Minimum Design Requirements for Vehicles
Vehicle 410 411 412416 431 130
Ins ide Radius 31'10"17'6"20',33'6"23'
Outside Radius 33'7"26'6"26'6"37'6"39'
Length 26'26'6"25'6"45'44'
Overhang-Front 6'6'6'6'6'
Overhang-Rear I 7'7'7'I 11'13'6"
o-
jWidth-0 9'4"9'6"9'4"12'6"I 14'
I 1 I
I ,
G\l';v 30 30 I 35 i 35 48
I
I I
Whe el Base 188"160"134"I 216"240"
,
Road to Chasis
Clearance 18"18"18"18"1 8"
He ight 14'14 '14'I 14 '14 '
Rem arks:
brineescott
architects
143 e.meadowdr;
vail.colorado 81657
(303)476·3038
••
I·lay 8,1987
Ms .Kristan Pritz
Community Development Dept .
Town ofVail
75 S.Frontage Rd.
Vail,Co.81657
Re:Lionshead Centre
Dear Kristan:
-•
As discussed today by phone.we are continuing to work on the
masterplanningofthe Lionshead Centre Building.You may re-
call that staff and some PEC Commissioners had concern for land-
scaping at thewest end ofour proposed addition aswellas for
theimpactthe extension tothemall would have on fire truck
access.We have been working withRick Pylman in attempt to
resolve these matters .Also,we have been studying.withthe
developer,various internal changestothe building.I realize
that this processhasexceeded the allocated ninety dayreview
period.butwiththe issues outstanding andthe number of parties
involved I believe we are still on track for construction sta rting
in the Springof'88.I understand from our conversation to d~y
that the developer will notbe required to make re-application
this Mayornext NovemberlJnder subsection A for proposed
exterior a lterations.We ofcourse are required to obtain PEC
and DRB approval for the project and lIm hoping that we can
have a package sufficient for PEC approval by early August .
Because the Urban Design Guidelines for Vail Lionshead do not
specifically call for expansiontothewest am I tounderstand
that we must obtain a set back variance since we proposeto
encroach5'into the existing 10'set back -even though the
existing building already encroaches5.4 feet?Also we have
proposed that an architectural canopy (i.e .anelement inte-
grated into the overall northfacade)be permitted to overhang
town property by 2.5to3 .5 feet.What procedure other than
PEC and DRB hearings will be necessary toachieve this?
Ilookforwardtohearing from you.
Yours truly,..
Thomas A.Briner
TAB/sw
cc:Oscar Tang
EstachioCortina
PRESENT
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
3/23/87
STAFFPRESENT
J.J.Collins
Diana Donovan
Peggy Osterfoss
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
Peter Patten
Rick Pylman
Betsy Rosolack
ABSENT
Byran Hobbs
Pam Hopkins
The meeting was called to order by the chairman,Jim Viele.
1.A request for a conditional use permit for commercial
storage at the West Vail Mall located at 2161 North
Frontage Road.
Applicant:Vail Mall Joint Venture/Mr.Dave Tyrrell
Rick Pylman stated that the applicant was requesting to utilize
375 square feet of space located on the northwest corner of the
lower level below Bullock's for storage.Dave Tyrrell was
present representing the Vail Mall Joint Venture.
Diana Donovan moved and J.J.Collins seconded to approve the
request for commercial storage.The vote was 5-0 in favor.
2.A request for a front setback variance and requests for
conditional uses for a drive-through window and outdoor
dining deck on Pacel A,A Resubdivision of Tract D,Vail
das Schone Subdivision.
Applicant:The Wend Group Partnership
Rick Pylman explained that both setback variances and
conditional uses were being requested.The property had
recently been subdivided and rezoned to CCIII.Rick showed site
and landscape plans and stated that the staff felt there would
not be any negative impacts from the request.Jay Peterson
represented the applicant and stated that he had worked with the
staff for 9 months on the SUbdivision,rezoning and then this
application.
J.J.Collins stated that the applicant had been to DRB concerning
the aesthetics for conceptual review.Peggy Osterfoss felt the
use was appropriate for the site.She wondered how snow removal
would work and was told that the applicant had committed to
hauling the snow away.Diana Donovan felt there should be a
small area to store some snow.The applicant stated that there
would be room on the westerly side,but to meet the Town of VaiJ
code,would require more space than there was available.Diana
answered that many times when snow is supposed to be hauled
away it doesn't quite get done.
Peter Patten asked how the parking had been computed,and was
told that there were more spaces than the Town of Vail required,
but the number of spaces was similar to other restaurants the
applicant operated.Sid Schultz was concerned about snow
removal and wanted to make certain that the DRB would focus on
needed landscaping .Jim Viele felt that regarding the setbacks,
he felt it was better to use some of the unused portion of the
road setback rather than push the building back and have to h ave
more retainage.Diana asked if it would be possible to have
higher landscaping on the back,and was told that small
evergreens would be planted on the retaining walls.
Diana Donovan moved and Peggy Osterfoss seconded to approve the
cond itional use permit request per the staff memo dated 3/23 /87.
The vote was 5-0 in favor.
Diana Donovan moved and sid Schultz seconded to approve the
setback variance request per the staff memo with concern of t he
PEC to DRB regarding landscaping and snow storage.The vote was
5-0 in favor.
3.A request for a setback
the Lionshead Centre Buildin
Vail Lionshead Firat-Frr rng.
A licant:Vak~Lionshead Centre
space too
Block 1,
ndominium Assoc.
Rick pyman stated that the applicant requested to table the
request to an unspecified date.
Diana Donovan moved and Peggy Osterfoss seconded to table the
request.The vote was 5-0 i n favor.
bri ner scot t
ar chitec t s
1 ~3 c 'r:f :-l ':V/..(:r
':all CCII:,.'C:(;':-~~t .~::J
••
February23,1987
Mr.Peter Patten,Director
Community Development
Town ofVail
75 S.Frontage Road
Vail,Colorado 81657
Dear Peter:
••
I believe you share with me a desire toseea substantial upgrade
oftheLionsheadCentre Building.The existing retail presentation
tothe Mall is unattractive,if not uninviting,andthe character
oftheLionshead Mall suffers accordingly.
Followingour work session meetingwiththePlanning Commi ssion on
February23rd,I was left withthe impression that that groupand
your staff generally remain supportive ofexpanding retail into
the Mall but you will notagreetoaplan that eliminates t rees -
these being at thewestendofthe building.
Although it apparently haslab eled me asbeing again st nature thus
inthe camp of nuclear waste spillers,Front Range water grabbers
etc.etc.,Ihave recommended the elimination of the trees because
I believe the results intheconte xt oftheLionshead Mall problems,
areworth it.I mean this intermsof visual values aswell as
economic ones.As I told the Commission unless adevelopment
"package"canbe made reasonably attractive toa potential develo per
there is no reason why the develope r shouldlooktoexc eptionally
high construction costs,possibly continuing strife withacondo-
minium association,protracted negotiations with lessees,further
meeting s withPlanning Commission andDRB,andthe associated design
timeand fees unless there is some possibility that there canbea
return on his investment.
The present scheme proposes approximately 4,000sq .ft.of additi onal
retail adjacent the Mall.To savethe trees would require the
elimination ofover 1,600sq.ft.of this plan ~ora 40%-reducti on
of possible added retail area.The support ofthe proposal,byVail
Associates,is duetoour inclusion ofaSki School Ticket outlet
on theMall.This would be lost if we are to keep the trees.Further
VA wishestoupgrade its Childrens'-Center -a t-thelower level,By
keepingthe treeswewouldlose44 %ofwhat~e had gainedwithour
expansion plans for this level.Remember,we're already to the
pr operty line on the south andtheparkinggarage is tothe east,thus
there i s no other way to expand thi s facility.
To reducethe potential for expansi on by 40%in my mind putsthe
proj ect in jeopardy consequently killing the prospects for an improved
Mall.Also lost is an opportunity for a terrific "public square"at
the terminu s oftheMall,within thespace between thewestendof
....•Mr.Peter Patten
February23,1987
Page Two
Alfie Packers and the ramp tothegondola.I don't think it s hould
be an either/or issue of trees vsdevelopment.(Although it's
obviousto many ofus that you're a good guy if you saveor plant a
tree and a bad guy if you suggest building anything in this town).
Ratherthe question shouldbe:are the present trees inthe best
location from anurbandesign point of view?They are now perceived
as necessary (a)because they're of reasonable size,and (b)because
theyhidea less than attractive building facade.Not as obvious,
butas greatly appreciated,is that these trees also take up space
and possibly what is most negative about Lionshead is the amount of
open,unoccupied space that tendsto separate buildings rather than
connect them alaVail Village.We proposeto replace the trees with
activities that will generate pedestrian motion -withthe belief
that this pedestrianization is of more value at that location than
trees.We believe the trees would beof more valuein another
location -as part ofthe transition between the landscape ofthe
Mall and the soft scape tothe south,below thegondola ramp.
In summary I'm afraid unless there is some flexibility in attitude
regarding these trees that will allowfor greater utilization of
the retail development potential,there very likely will be no
project at all.Ilookforwardto any suggestions you oryour staff
may have.
Yours truly,
Tff'tN
Thomas A.Briner
BRINER/SCOTT ARCHITECTS
TAB:ka
cc:Eustaquio Cortina
Oscar Tang
David Lindsay
Ricardo Eversbusch
••
PUBLIC NOTICE
-•
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the mun icipal code of the
To wn of Vail on March 23,1987 at 3:00 PM in the T own of Vail
Mun icipal Building.
Consideration of:
1.A request for a conditional use permit for commercial storage
at the West Vail Mall located at 2161 North Frontage Road.
Applicant:Vail Mall Joint Venture
2.A request for a front setback variance and requests for
conditional uses for a drive-thru window and outdoor dining
deck on Parcel A,a Resubdivis ion of Tract D,Vail Das Schone
Subdivision.
Applicant:The Wend Group partnership
3.A request for a setback variance to add retail space to the
Lionshead centre Building located on Lot 5,Block 1,Vail
Lionshead First Filing.
Applicant:Vail Lionshead Centre Condominium Association
..•
4.A request for an exterior alteration a nd for density and
height variances in order to construct an addition to the
sitzmark Lodge located at 183 Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant:sitzmark Lodge/Bob Fritch
The applications and information about the proposals are available
in the zoning administrator's office during regUlar office hours
for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THOMAS A.BRAUN
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail on March 6,1987
••
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning andEnvironmental Commission ofthe
Town ofVail will holda public hearing inaccordancewith Section 18.66.060
ofthemunicipalcodeofthe Town ofVail on February23,1987 at 3:00 PM in
the Town Council chambers intheVailMunicipal Bu ilding.
Consideration of:
1.A request for an exterior alteration in Commercial Core IIin order to
add more than 100 square feet of enclosed floor area byexpanding retail
and residential space at theLionsheadCentre Building.The Lionshead
Centre Building is located on Lot5,Block1,VailLionshead First
Filing .
Applicant:VailLionshead Centre Condominium Association
2 .A request to create a new zone district,Hillside Residential {HR),to
provide sites for low density single family residential use.
Applicant:Town ofVail
The applications and information aboutthe proposals are available in the
zoning administrator's office during regular off ice hours for public
inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THOMAS A.BRAUN
Zoning Admini strator
Publi shed intheVail Trail on February6,1987.
,.
LI!~fee
~~-/«0 -1/;/~~-1t;fUCuk.
~
-~,J,-:w/d&;;;~4 ~~h-~#;H ~~~L--r
/?J~
/AR4r:I /()/Whd-,n,/f/;c/~
~~~7~c -~2J-I
~
sM~/~r~
~
C'~~~/~~L
(J~vK-c-c-c-
-!"df ~U4L-~-J4UU Un
~•'..--or--
--
s ~\~';co"",-w-~\~+Lc.1--WOV\''--
~\V1-t tVo....tt VV\'\)GV -S i U c-~~1c.~-a.-
b....>-r-'S c;+\6 ~-eo c..e.:.v-c..-'!./V"'.'O Ov""--r-oH~--5
V\~C-Co VV\~,,0Y\.1I&e.-~Ye:>o J.
PDb l -hOY'-S d~-Ie:.Co7'V1?k')()7'c>r-
(p~c...'S "So c..~~Yv;r/0 V1-'\.1 &e.~
~k-hI ~o~llc.c;V'-j-_
I~1e:o -.Q X.kV\S1 v'€....-
(O~~.e.~~~~1J
X{C>~~5 \.-..<:.0 h~V\-\<;~~~~'5
~~he.c...h<:>V"'-.I~-Q'iJ6+'V"'~~Ol Id,~
~o-ffyc.'t b c....Io+-of w"""T-\0 wtJ>'"'c,
\...0\~Ll~6~J..-~~YoVo&""l~
I~c::;f06"f-.v--t-"'I~~c..l...fo ~
of t-k rfD6LoQ.VV\.~
~\6~~\C-V'~c.",~'~(,?~t.....~~a..J'ea,.)
tk-~~Svf kCA-
Qe%d f0c.te--r -(yr-
-
~~~vt{O"~~A9f~.+~S(./Bn-tl/-nd)
~~~~L-.tC:>~"E>~i)u-e~
~(C>~C:.V,~L.A-~.
~~5~~
(;l!l0 71 0 -~wfftfl2~fSl ~
TA~c.c=-~y
~TJ-4 r P--~-.I 6-.'/..~t>--.~~~~'l"'"--
lVV\t~0~Y\'\.00.-..Jll.A-I,J ~cF
~b V I ~!J<:::,L.M "f:.
~~~15 -E!;:O~I6J'=~-n~
'S::->1A-1~L--.S .(S ,1M..Yai..r~-~....J \-(-
L.I I(.e::.-~b 'nC57"--.1 Flo '-""\~L L....U I 0G
~?.A-v~-t2'e.~i)
<.~Ikc.sn,...)("b '-t7-~
L......::lo00 •~<=/b:ovV\~
5:>vV\~~~A-P{06-
-U=:-'fV~1b?~r-J~....J,A~
../1-~--/Dr,C00~7<s:V
.A'S I S .~
?~~~ST..>'\lJe,..'V!ie'0Lj)
&=r o:»'Pc>e..~
?L-k~LotlG<s -P~.All\A~7C::>
O~-S u G Ge:-'"5'71C>o--J -VVv<::.IT-
~;1Itf0 ?~.~
••
c.deL II~~~f-o
c,J~c..->\j-!-...
II-u'j ~~
r'\-e.--..;l d'€&I~V'""'o..c..~"e~~c,II \.,\~COV'u../1I\2)
~q.-it>"l)J2i5 -"''''t:v'£/~/~
or '\-t...-:>c.:><..,..)...-.)~c...~d..co.L>?-.......e,~
,V"'.t..-).........k.r -I {2-Vb ~~~.AQ...ol;!.,.,-::>
+-V'~(~iL c.h{16~J
U I'"-.""
d\X c»~"::>I C>'"0 v-...~<"'0 \~{.v «e:c...V·e.P,.
Id~.-<2.-~(C>~5 ....1 0.'::>clro t..J ""'~1~
~.f c.S":l c....J-ee-,--.VVl"'-j l/1C>+-IA-Q..Q L
::0 ~...>(_.l~,~\IV'<L 4 l/V\CNlsy I V\f.e
delN'Ol\hoV\.
-•
•I i vi\~~CAcl ~
-r d---y!l ''Sirl\.\rWl ctrt-;I\t..~,-~1b rb~kAt~·
f~N\~~~L-c~bLLi\dJM~~cuk-
~$Y ~?oJ')'~ili\~V\ClY.-1~Lf>o-;UJW~~\,tl~\J
)i a,\D ~,I)\~;"VtDL0 ct&J nClJ 'ruJl,.~-ie-L-T
~CJ~lOl\
\
_~QN\Y .~u)~~b\~~i~-Iv k ~If
:tit ~~~(f\.lJ~Mf~o{1\ctO·
~\R-bm~L~)D -t x )'t )
1\0 \\D~\~f\L W ~---
faN\:fuf~l&rk('~'"~0Jli2-ch~-*W lktel-~/¥~-'P{'
jJ:.\h(\~\b uld hL OL1 ~~ueJ ~\Ao .--\u ·~\~.0fJ~~DSclLiD \~~lhuR u ~o
c1w.or v ,~,
J3 i 0r...
DATE OF PU BLIC HE ARI NG'------
.-
I NTER-DE PARTM ENTAL REVIEW
PRO JECT:.c:;<J /Vs ~?c/G ~rU'2
DATE SU BMITTED:
CO MME NTS NEEDED--BY-:------------------
BRI EF DESC RIPTION OF THE PRO POSAL:
·,..•
PUBLI C WOR KS
Rev;ewed by:____________Date
Comments :.----------
.,,-?//,../.,,>/..h'1 I ..?..'-"c...:;//1 C <.~/2-<a ~,/l.J~";::;::
2).,,?/.£J f/';C/M"....;P0 V<-'~<-..-vd'..r</h -4<-C:--<~a/<?C"../r-.'3 /1 ~
,?'c...,.....:s.>-~vC F7?'.-../'
/-.../C /'--<..--0.6>"'.1 /c~-/C A/J-
_________________Da t e--------
5JU,c~/0 2 07{/)CN~,~1,/'~"·~
vrc /0-?Ol (.4)~A~"~/tJiJ l'~/~.y~~
f'~;n~'"e7'
/)~.~G~"'/J7 ,"""-/J4*~Z:-/fi6U'"JZ-~~...........-.
RE CREATIOtI DE PART r~E N T
Rev;eh'e d by:
Comme n t s:
.-..•
/3 l~.
,-
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING"----
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT:L;<:J N'J ~?O/C ~nr72
DATE SUBf4ITTED :-------
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:-------
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PUBU C WORKS
Rev i ewed by:Date
Co mments:.------
/_/.5 -:C;:-0-J
Date------
.::})/~/....,J ",~../'°2.~
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:Dlate
Co mments:-----
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev i ewed by:4/-~6 ~
Comments:,)/L --...,,L/c..).""'/0/A '-~~
___________Da ta _
REC RE ATION DE PARTMENT
Rev i ewed by:
CO riJne nts:
.-
..'
COMMERCIAL CORE 2 (CC2)DISTRICT
18.26.060 Lot area and site dimensions.
The minimum lot or site areas hallbeten thousand square
feet o f bu ildable area .a ndeachsi te s hallha vea min imum
fronta ge oi t hirty feet.Each s ite s hallb eofas ize and s hape
capabl e o f encl osing a square ar eaeighty feet 011 eac hs idew ithin
its boundari es.(Ord .12(1978)§J (pa rt l .)
13.25.070 Setbacks.
In eC2 district the minimum front setback shall betenfeet:
the minimum s ide setback shall betenfeet;and the minimum
rear setback shall betenfeet unless otherwise specified intheVail
Lionshead urban de sign guide plan and de sign considerations.
(Ord .21(1980)§2 (partj.)
18 .26.090 Height.
F or a flat roof or mansard roof,t he height of bu ildingss hall
not exceed f o rty-fivefeet.For a sloping roof,the height o f
build ings shall not exceed fort y-eight feet.These restrictions
p ertainu nless otherwise specified b y the Vail Lionshead urban
design gu ide plan and urban des ign cons iderations.(Ord.
37(1980)§2 (part).)
18.26.100 Density control.
Unless otherwise specified i ntheVail Lionshead urban
desi gng uide plan.not more than e ighty squa re feet of gross
res identialfloor a rea (GRFA)shall be permitted fo r each one
hundred square feet of buildable site area.Total density shall
3 56-2a 1,,",111 ~-7 -1C 4 1
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 27,1988
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
MEMBERS ABSENT
Bryan Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
Grant Riva
STAFFPRESENT
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylman
Larry Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
The meeting was called to order by Jim Viele,chairman.
1.Approval of minutes of June 13.
seconded to approve the minutes.
Diana moved and Pam
Vote was 4-0 in favor.
2.A request for ~.a.n-exterior alteration and a setback
variance-in order t6~construct an addition to the
Lionshead Center Build!nq.
Applicant:Lionshead eenter Condo Association
~--·~r o p osa l .He explained that the
building had been pulled back,and that now there was no need
for a setback variance,merely an exterior alteration.Rick
showed the revised site plans and landscape plans.He added
that the applicant had also changed the design at the Skiers
Sculpture,but that the staff preferred the original design.
The new proposal showed only the addition of trees in this
area.
Tom Briner,representing the applicant,showed a sketch of the
west end of the building with changes.Pam Hopkins expressed
appreciation for the changes made to the building.sid felt
that the applicant had addressed all of his concerns.Diana
Donovan wanted to pass along to the DRB her feeling that 'most
of the trees should be evergreens,or else if not,that
Christmas lights be placed in the trees in the winter.Jim
Viele agreed with Diana.He also added that he felt the plan
represented a significant improvement.
Rick asked the board how they felt about the design at the
Skiers Sculpture.They seemed to feel that just the addition
of the trees was O.K.Diana suggested encouraging the DRB to
soften the area with the addition of grass.
Diana moved to approve the request for an exterior alteration
per the staff memo with the direction to DRB to request
evergreens or lights and to soften the area around the Skiers
Sculpture.The motion was seconded by Pam and the vote was
4-0 in favor.
3.A request for a side setback variance in order to
construct an addition to a duplex located at Lot 2,Gore
Creek Meadows,Filing 1.
Applicant:Firooz E.Zadeh
Kristan Pritz presented the request.The staff recommendation
was for approval,as it was felt it was not a grant of special
privilege.A similar type of variance was granted the owner of
the other side of the duplex.
Diana moved and Pam seconded to approve the setback variance
per the staff memo and the finding concerning strict
interpretation.The vote was 4-0 in favor.
4.A request for a side setback variance,a parking variance
and for a density variance in order to construct an
addition to the Tivoli Lodge located on Lot E,Block 2,
Vail Village 5th Filing.
Applicant:Robert Lazier
Tom Braun explained the requests and showed site plans and
elevations.He reviewed the criteria,explaining the inter-
relatedness of the requests.Tom then discussed the criteria
and findings,the related policies to the Comprehensive Plan,
and the concern about valet parking.He explained that the
staff was concerned about the proposal for many reasons.They
felt that the mass could be reduced,thereby minimizing impacts
on adjacent properties and the public walk way.Another
concern was the interim and permanent parking solution.Tom
stated that the Action Plan recommended a "small infill"in
this area.It was felt that the level of development proposed
and the number of variances involved outweighed the benefits,
and the staff recommended denial of the requests.
Jay Peterson,representing the applicant,stated that the plan
envisioned by the Master Plan proposed parking on the P-2 Lot
and Jay felt that these spaces were actually on site,as they
were owned by the Tivoli.He mentioned that the applicant
could have requested an SOD,but without the SOD,many
variances were needed.Jay stated that the purpose of the
proposal was to up-grade the family-owned lodge.He stated
that one purpose of the Action Plan was to increase the number
of accommodation units.He felt that the Town needed to
encourage proposals that added more hotel rooms.He disagreed
with the staff.Jay added that the parking demand was simply
not there.He also added that the view impacted was not
sacred.Jay felt that the proposal modified views,but did not
eliminated them.
Jay discussed the pedestrian way,stating that he felt the
resulting enclosure of the path was pleasing.He pointed out
that the Master Plan indicated 2-1/2 stories along Hanson Ranch
.",.~~,.,.....~.\,...........\",.'·'1 ·_",--~J..~,.,.r::,-'-<II ,
.'
.-
A p ~li c at i on ~-ber ----
••
SI G;:APP l ICA TI O~
The fol1O\~ing ;n for::l'at ion ts required for s ubm i t ta l by t he applic ant
to the Des ign Re v i ew Bo ard be fore a final ap pro val can be given.
Si gn su cmi tta 1 fee is $20.00.'.
A.S ign Ha te r-ial :i!J~7j;,e {,l"?$,,;,-0 AI (~;;;;,ls ...--
.-.'
C.5 i z e of 5i gn --lo!.----£~=--'-':::...-__..=:l._~____:._
B.Des cr i pt'i cn of Sign Fi1c/l/lEp tPtt!(lIlNtJ/J.s i/FlL../tIlJC£
6 rr (lit?1(7:'/(CL £flUE!?I S \\o"J(y tVOIM'D.PD~k:
6 "r K 5"",3 N ~2 b..<;jJ<
L ()~LPc>,/D.ength 'of Fron tace Ft.~~
E.Cozm ents__-------------_
--
NA TE RI AlS SUa;·iT TTED IHTH APPLI CAn ON
S i gn Adm1n1Strata r
1.Site Pl an
2 .Or al·lings sL"ho-\·-n-:ng=--=-ex::"'a·ct loc a tion _
3.Pho togra phs s howing pr oposed locat1 0n
4 .Ac tu al s ign --------
5 .Col or eds cale ara','llng _
6.Photo graph of sign _
Ap pro ved for ORB Sub::litt al
Disap pr oved for ORB Su c ~i t t a l ___
-.'
Sig nAdm1nlstrJtOr...
"'0 ~..'...
•.
.::"'.-..-.•
'0 "•
".....-,_::,
Date --~-i-...!-"::-'':'''''';'=------
•
--?(c,h
I
.-
ProjectApplication
Project Nam e:"':"""..L..--':"'--=-_-'-'-'-=-"';""'__"'--''---:;':-~_
:
Project Description:_
Contact Per sona nd Phone
Own er ,Add ressandPhon e:_
Ar chitect ,Address and Ph one:
(..,11-~-h.~
L egalDes cript ion :Lot Block Fi ling
Comme nts :
/)I ("7 /77
___________,Zone _
1
1/
DesignReviewBoa rd
Dat e _
M otionby:
Seconded by:
A PPROVAL D ISAPPROVAL
Summary:_
J /
/'
Dat e :
Town Planner
!/f lar
G (Staff Approval-:
I I
the prlJllery 'ya,1
.,
'/
r/
.--•
IJ()~)/~17fj~
1Sf?Llc.E:D.Ij.//l£~
•
SIJNAj€'.vJllJ Te .-Pnlf1/T£.P ·it'CLElJtJER.S \l .
~~/C/lps -
71Fr/?Ny'Tyr£F.4cE.
I
I
•
January
75 south trontage road
vall ,colorado 81657
9~3)4illj IPgo,officeofcommunity development
Mr.Eustaqu io cortina
Lionshead Centre Condo Ass.
c/o Vail Home Rentals
143 East Meadow Drive
#365
Vail,Colorado 81657
Re:Lionshead Centre Expansion
Dear Eustaquio:
On Thursday of last week,the Community Development staff met
on site and reviewed the latest site planning proposal for the
Lionshead Centre expansion.Our general response to your
proposed program was pos itive.We felt that the additional
planting and landscaping areas contribute to the plaza and
reduce the impact of the loss of the landscaped area at the
western end of the Lionshead Centre building.Upon completion
of detailed building elevations,we would like to meet with
your architect on site to discuss a few possible refinements to
the site planning and elevations.
Following this discussion,I believe we will be ready to start
the formal review process.We will continue to keep you
informed as to submission requirements and scheduling details.
I look forward to continuing working with you on this project.
Sincerel~~
(CL 1Yc
Rick Pylman
Town Planner
RP:br
cc:Gary swetish
I
-•I
t
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 13,1988
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins
Grant Riva
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
ABSENT
Bryan Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Rick Pylman
Betsy Rosolack
The meeting was called to order by the chairman,Jim Viele.
1.Approval of minutes of May 23.A correction was made to
the minutes,and they were approved 4-0-1 with Pam
abstaining.
2 .This item was delayed until the end.
3 .A request for an ext~ration and a setback
variance in order to construct an addition to the
Lionshead Center Building )
Applicant:Lionshead Center Condo Assoc.
V .>
Rick Pylman first--explained-the -exterior alteration request and
showed site plans.He stated that the proposal was in
compliance with the Urban Design Guide Plan design
considerations on the south and north elevations.However,the
staff had reservations concerning the encroachment and
development on the west end of the building.He discussed
zoning considerations and stated that the staff recommended
denial of the application,although they had strong support for
the additions to the north and south.As far as the setback
variance was concerned,the staff recommended denial of that
also,and felt that just a desire for more retail on the west
corner was not proof of physical hardship.
Tom Briner,architect on the project,showed a model and
explained that it was necessary for all the parties involved to
come to an agreement,and that some concessions had to be made
to some retailers.He pointed out that the last time this was
presented,two issues were raised:1)unvaried eave line and
building edge.Now there is 30%glass,which could be changed
to 100%glass for more visual attraction for pedestrians.2)
A canopy which extended over the property line and was a
problem to the Fire Department.Briner stated that the staff
was concerned with trees.He said that each time he did
•
something to appease the
to the persons involved.
requirements.
-
staff,he was told he had to go back
He felt that he had satisfied the
\
Tom stated that Larry Benway,a local landscaper,had told Tom
that the large trees would not grow further,so in lieu of
trees,Tom suggested putting "something a~sthetic"in the
corner.The stair would be broadened to help feature the
children's center.
A representative from the Younger Generation stated that she
liked the trees,but did not feel it was necessary to have
grass on that corner.She added that for years the area with
the grass has not been taken care of and became a place people
threw trash in the summer and snow was plowed into the area in
the winter.
Grant stated that he was in general agreement with the staff
regarding improvements on the north and south sides.His
concern was on the west side.He felt that this was a corridor
to the mountain and was also concerned about the views from the
north being affected.
Briner answered that he did not feel there would be an effect
on the view from Bart 'n Yeti's.VA was not opposed to the
construction on the west end.
Grant stated that if the addition did appear to keep an opening
between the Lionshead Center Building and the ticket booths at
this time,there could still be a problem when Vail Associates
added onto their building.
Briner stated that if he could not do the west corner,he could
not do the building.Grant felt it would be nice to have some
sort of landscaping on the west end.He added that it had
been mentioned that this area was also used for snow storage,
and wondered if this meant there could be a problem with snow
storage.Rick replied that with continued development,the
Town must truck more snow.
Diana stated that each time the Lionshead Center Building was
brought before the Board,they were closer to a solution.She
still felt the need for large trees on the end of the building
to buffer the building.She added that if the 10 foot setback
was respected,large trees could remain.
Briner answered that this was not as simple as it seemed.He
felt that perhaps trees could be planted toward the north.
Diana said that there would still be a large building,and
Briner answered that it would be stepped down to change the
scale.
Diana liked what was to be done with the sculpture of the
skiers,and felt the area near the popcorn wagon should be left
•
open because of congestion.She felt there should be some
landscaping near the building.
Oscar Tang,officer of the condo association and owner of the
commercial part of the building,stated that he was only a part
time resident and not a professional,but felt he might be
able to give a different perspective.He stated that the
building was sound economically,so there was no economic drive
on his part to remodel.Tang stated that something must be
done with Lionshead,especially the Lionshead Center Building.
He felt that what was really key was the west end of the
building.He pointed out that in Europe and in vail Village,
pavement went all the way to the buildings,and it worked well.
He said the object of the sub-area concept #12 was the ability
of people to relate to the buildings.The west end was a real
challenge because there were no shops or windows to relate to.
He felt the proposal was the correct solution.Tang stated
that he was willing to replace the trees 2 to 1 anywhere the
staff desired,but felt these particular trees did not belong
on the west end.He had found he could bring in mature trees
and would place them anywhere on the mall.Tang stated that if
the west end could not be done,the project "was dead."He
added that the ski school really needed to expand and this was
a major part of the expansion.
Diana looked for a place to put "significant green space"
somewhere near the building.Estacio Cortina,president of the
condo association,said he felt the proposal was a win/win
situation.It would benefit Lionshead,Oscar Tang,and the
condo owners.He stated that the association had given him a
deadline (June 1,1988)to get approval.He felt the entrance
to Lionshead was more important than a few trees.
Diana stated that she was not saying that the trees as they now
stand must remain,but felt another tree in another location
could work.
Tom Briner showed where other tree grates could be located with
heights of 22'-25'.
sid Schultz stated that he liked Tang's comparison of Vail
Village and Lionshead and added that that in itself says things
must be done differently in Lionshead.He did not see a real
hardship to grant a setback variance,and felt it would set a
precedent.He felt there was still room for compromise.
Pam said the situation reminded her of the Golden Peak House
and stated that for the good of the community,there must be
compromise.She felt that if rules were followed completely
all of the time,nothing would get done.She felt the
existing planter looked "anemic"and did not like the split
rail fence.She felt the plaza still needed a lot more done to
it.
•
Briner said that possibly one problem with Lionshead was that
there were setbacks which made a sort of wasteland.
Jim Viele asked Rick what input had been gathered from the Town
Council and Rick responded that the Council was asked for
permission for the Lionshead Center to proceed with their
application since it included Town land.The Council did give
permission,but was concerned about the west end.
Jim stated that since the Board looked at the proposal about a
year ago,it had,in general,improved.He stated that this
building was as visible as any building in Lionshead.He felt
the public spaces were not planned nor controlled in Lionshead,
and pointed out that Vail Village did have vast expanses of
hardness.Jim felt the proposal came very close to something
he would support.He felt it was most important to add large
trees near the stairs on the west end and felt this would do a
lot to offset the removal of the trees to the east of the
stairs.Also,with the addition of other landscaping,he could
support the proposal.
Diana asked if the underground expansion could be proposed
without the expansion above ground,and Briner reminded her
that she wanted the tree roots to go all the way down.
Nancy Nottingham,VA employee in charge of the Children's
center,pointed out that one thing to be considered was that
they had a need for mall frontage.Another item to be
considered was a change in the entrance to Alfie Packer's.She
said the underground space was not as important to her.She
was hoping the building would go further south,and possibly
put the adult ski school downstairs and put the children
upstairs.
Pam moved to approve the request for the exterior alteration,
Grant seconded.The discussion continued.Viele felt there
should be some fairly detailed discussion involving the
landscaping,and stated that he would like to hear a more
specific proposal that responds to the concerns of the PEC.
Peter recommended that the PEC see a revised landscape plan and
Jim agreed.Peter added that when we attempt to redesign a
project,it is always beneficial to take bring back the
revis ions to ensure that everyone understood the changes to be
made.Sid stated that he would like to table the issue in
order to see the revised landscape plan.Pam stated that she
would withdraw the motion,but wanted the applicant to know
that there was no problem with the building.
Sid moved and Diana seconded to table this issue to June 27 or
July 11 upon timely receipt of revisions.The vote was 5-0 in
favor of tabling.Peter summarized that the only problem left
to deal with was the landscaping of the west end,and the PEC
would like to see a revised landscape plan.
•
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 13,1988
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins
Grant Riva
Sid Schultz
Jim Viele
STAFFPRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Rick Pylman
Betsy Rosolack
ABSENT
Bryan Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
The meeting was called to order by the chairman,Jim Viele.
1.Approval of minutes of May 23.A correction was made to
the minutes,and they were approved 4-0-1 with Pam
abstaining.
2.This item was delayed until the end.
3.A request for an -exterior alteration and a setback
variance in order to construct an addition to the
~o n sh e ad Center BUildin~
/Appi Th ant.Lionshead Center Condo Assoc.
Ri dk Pylman first explained the exterior alteration request and
showed site plans.He stated that the proposal was in
compliance with the Urban Design Guide Plan design
considerations on the south and north elevations.However,the
staff had reservations concerning the encroachment and
development on the west end of the building.He discussed
zoning considerations and stated that the staff recommended
denial of the application,although they had strong support for
the additions to the north and south.As far as the setback
variance was concerned,the staff recommended denial of that
also,and felt that just a desire for more retail on the west
corner was not proof of physical hardship.
Tom Briner,architect on the project,showed a model and
explained that it was necessary for all the parties involved to
come to an agreement,and that some concessions had to be made
to some retailers.He pointed out that the last time this was
presented,two issues were raised:1)unvaried eave line and
building edge.Now there is 30%glass,which could be changed
to 100%glass for more visual attraction for pedestrians.2)
A canopy which extended over the property line and was a
problem to the Fire Department.Briner stated that the staff
was concerned with trees.He said that each time he did
something to appease the
to the persons involved.
requirements.
•
staff,he was told he had to go back
He felt that he had satisfied the
Tom stated that Larry Benway,a local landscaper,had told Tom
that the large trees would not grow further,so in lieu of
trees,Tom suggested putting "something aesthetic"i n the
corner.The stair would be broadened to help feature the
children's center.
A representative from the Younger Generation stated that she
liked the trees,but did not feel it was necessary to have
grass on that corner.She added that for years the area with
the grass has not been taken care of and became a place people
threw trash in the summer and snow was plowed into the area in
the winter .
Grant stated that he was in general agreement with the staff
regarding improvements on the north and south sides.His
concern was on the west side.He felt that this was a corridor
to the mountain and was also concerned about the views from the
north being affected.
Briner answered that he did not feel there would be an effect
on the view from Bart 'n Yeti's.VA was not opposed to the
construction on the west end.
Grant stated that if the addition did appear to keep an opening
between the Lionshead Center Building and the ticket booths at
this time,there could still be a problem when Vail Associates
added onto their building.
Briner stated that if he could not do the west corner,he could
not do the building.Grant felt it would be nice to have some
sort of landscaping on the west end.He added that it had
been mentioned that this area was also used for snow storage,
and wondered if this meant there could be a problem with snow
storage.Rick replied that with continued development,the
Town must truck more snow.
Diana stated that each time the Lionshead Center Building was
brought before the Board,they were closer to a solution.She
still felt the need for large trees on the end of the building
to buffer the building.She added that if the 10 foot setback
was respected,large trees could remain.
Briner answered that this was not as simple as it seemed.He
felt that perhaps trees could be planted toward the north.
Diana said that there would still be a large building,and
Briner answered that it would be stepped down to change the
scale.
Diana liked what was to be done with the sculpture of the
skiers,and felt the area near the popcorn wagon should be left
•
open because of congestion.She felt there should be some
landscaping near the building.
Oscar Tang,officer of the condo association and owner of the
commercial part of the building,stated that he was only a part
time resident and not a professional,but felt he might be
able to give a different perspective.He stated that the
building was sound economically,so there was no economic drive
on his part to remodel.Tang stated that something must be
done with Lionshead,especially the Lionshead Center Building.
He felt that what was really key was the west end of the
building.He pointed out that in Europe and in vail Village,
pavement went all the way to the buildings,and it worked well.
He said the object of the sub-area concept #12 was the ability
of people to relate to the buildings.The west end was a real
challenge because there were no shops or windows to relate to.
He felt the proposal was the correct solution.Tang stated
that he was willing to replace the trees 2 to 1 anywhere the
staff desired,but felt these particular trees did not belong
on the west end.He had found he could bring in mature trees
and would place them anywhere on the mall.Tang stated that if
the west end could not be done,the project "was dead."He
added that the ski school really needed to expand and this was
a major part of the expansion.
Diana looked for a place to put "significant green space"
somewhere near the building.Estacio Cortina,president of the
condo association,said he felt the proposal was a win/win
situation.It would benefit Lionshead,Oscar Tang,and the
condo owners.He stated that the association had given him a
deadline (June 1,1988)to get approval.He felt the entrance
to Lionshead was more important than a few trees.
Diana stated that she was not saying that the trees as they now
stand must remain,but felt another tree in another location
could work.
Tom Briner showed where other tree grates could be located with
heights of 22'-25'.
sid Schultz stated that he liked Tang's comparison of Vail
Village and Lionshead and added that that in itself says things
must be done differently in Lionshead.He did not see a real
hardship to grant a setback variance,and felt it would set a
precedent.He felt there was still room for compromise.
Pam said the situation reminded her of the Golden Peak House
and stated that for the good of the community,there must be
compromise.She felt that if rules were followed completely
all of the time,nothing would get done.She felt the
existing planter looked "anemic"and did not like the split
rail fence.She felt the plaza still needed a lot more done to
it.
•
Briner said that possibly one problem with Lionshead was that
there were setbacks which made a sort of wasteland.
Jim Viele asked Rick what input had been gathered from the Town
Council and Rick responded that the Council was asked for
permission for the Lionshead Center to proceed with their
application since it included Town land.The Council did give
permission,but was concerned about the west end.
Jim stated that since the Board looked at the proposal about a
year ago,it had ,in general,improved.He stated that this
building was as visible as any building in Lionshead.He felt
the pUblic spaces were not planned nor controlled in Lionshead,
and pointed out that Vail Village did have vast expanses of
hardness.Jim felt the proposal came very close to something
he would support.He felt it was most important to add large
trees near the stairs on the west end and felt this would do a
lot to offset the removal of the trees to the east of the
stairs.Also,with the addition of other landscaping,he could
support the proposal.
Diana asked if the underground expansion could be proposed
without the expansion above ground,and Briner reminded her
that she wanted the tree roots to go all the way down.
Nancy Nottingham,VA employee in charge of the Children's
Center,pointed out that one thing to be considered was that
they had a need for mall frontage.Another item to be
considered was a change in the entrance to Alfie Packer's.She
said the underground space was not as important to her.She
was hoping the building would go further south,and possibly
put the adult ski school downstairs and put the children
upstairs.
Pam moved to approve the request for the exterior alteration,
Grant seconded.The discussion continued.Viele felt there
should be some fairly detailed discussion involving the
landscaping,and stated that he would like to hear a more
specific proposal that responds to the concerns of the PEC.
Peter recommended that the PEC see a revised landscape plan and
Jim agreed.Peter added that when we attempt to redesign a
project,it is always beneficial to take bring back the
revisions to ensure that everyone understood the changes to be
made.Sid stated that he would like to table the issue in
order to see the revised landscape plan.Pam stated that she
would withdraw the motion,but wanted the applicant to know
that there was no problem with the building.
sid moved and Diana seconded to table this issue to June 27 or
July 11 upon timely receipt of revisions .The vote was 5-0 in
favor of tabling.Peter summarized that the only problem left
to deal with was the landscaping of the west end,and the PEC
would like to see a revised landscape plan.
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 13,1988
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins
Grant Riva
sid Schultz
Jim Viele
ABSENT
Bryan Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
STAFFPRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Rick pylman
Betsy Rosolack
The meeting was called to order by the chairman,Jim Viele.
1.Approval of minutes of May 23.A correction was made to
the minutes,and they were approved 4-0-1 with Pam
abstaining.
2.This item was delayed until the end.
3.setback
to the
Rick Pylman first exp a~ne request and
showed site plans.He stated that the proposal was in
compliance with the Urban Design Guide Plan design
considerations on the south and north elevations.However,the
staff-had reservations concerning the encroachment and
development on the west end of the building.He discussed
zoning cons iderations and stated that the staff recommended
denial of the application,although they had strong support for
the additions to the north and south.As far as the setback
variance was concerned,the staff recommended denial of that
also,and felt that just a desire for more retail on the west
corner was not proof of physical hardship.
Tom Briner,architect on the project,showed a model and
explained that it was necessary for all the parties involved to
come to an agreement,and that some concessions had to be made
to some retailers.He pointed out that the last time this was
presented,two issues were raised:1)unvaried eave line and
building edge.Now there is 30%glass,Which could be changed
to 100%glass for more visual attraction for pedestrians.2)
A canopy which extended over the property line and was a
problem to the Fire Department.Briner stated that the staff
was concerned with trees.He said that each time he did
,
something to appease the
to the persons involved.
requirements.
staff,he was told he had to go back
He felt that he had satisfied the
Tom stated that Larry Benway,a local landscaper,had told Tom
that the large trees would not grow further,so in lieu of
trees,Tom suggested putting "something a~sthetic"in the
corner.The stair would be broadened to help feature the
children's center.
A representative from the Younger Generation stated that she
liked the trees,but did not feel it was necessary to have
grass on that corner.She added that for years the area with
the grass has not been taken care of and became a place people
threw trash in the summer and snow was plowed into the area in
the winter.
Grant stated that he was in general agreement with the staff
regarding improvements on the north and south sides.His
concern was on the west side.He felt that this was a corridor
to the mountain and was also concerned about the views from the
north being affected.
Briner answered that he did not feel there would be an effect
on the view from Bart 'n Yeti's.VA was not opposed to the
construction on the west end.
Grant stated that if the addition did appear to keep an opening
between the Lionshead Center Building and the ticket booths at
this time,there could still be a problem when vail Associates
added onto their building.
Briner stated that if he could not do the west corner,he could
not do the building.Grant felt it would be nice to have some
sort of landscaping on the west end.He added that it had
been mentioned that this area was also used for snow storage,
and wondered if this meant there could be a problem with snow
storage.Rick replied that with continued development,the
Town must truck more snow.
Diana stated that each time the Lionshead Center Building was
brought before the Board,they were closer to a solution.She
still felt the need for large trees on the end of the building
to buffer the building.She added that if the 10 foot setback
was respected,large trees could remain.
Briner answered that this was not as simple as it seemed.He
felt that perhaps trees could be planted toward the north.
Diana said that there would still be a large building,and
Briner answered that it would be stepped down to change the
scale.
Diana liked what was to be done with the sculpture of the
skiers,and felt the area near the popcorn wagon should be left
open because of congestion.She felt there should be some
landscaping near the building.
Oscar Tang,officer of the condo association and owner of the
commercial part of the building,stated that he was only a part
time resident and not a professional,but felt he might be
able to give a different perspective.He stated that the
building was sound economically,so there was no economic drive
on his part to remodel.Tang stated that something must be
done with Lionshead,especially the Lionshead Center Building.
He felt that what was really key was the west end of the
building.He pointed out that in Europe and in vail Village,
pavement went all the way to the buildings,and it worked well.
He said the object of the sub-area concept #12 was the ability
of people to relate to the buildings.The west end was a real
challenge because there were no shops or windows to relate to.
He felt the proposal was the correct solution.Tang stated
that he was willing to replace the trees 2 to 1 anywhere the
staff desired,but felt these particular trees did not belong
on the west end.He had found he could bring in mature trees
and would place them anywhere on the mall.Tang stated that if
the west end could not be done,the project "was dead."He
added that the ski school really needed to expand and this was
a major part of the expansion.
Diana looked for a place to put "significant green space"
somewhere near the building.Estacio cortina,president of the
condo association,said he felt the proposal was a win/win
situation.It would benefit Lionshead,Oscar Tang,and the
condo owners.He stated that the association had given him a
deadline (June 1,1988)to get approval.He felt the entrance
to Lionshead was more important than a few trees.
Diana stated that she was not saying that the trees as they now
stand must remain,but felt another tree in another location
could work.
Tom Briner showed where other tree grates could be located with
heights of 22'-25'.
sid Schultz stated that he liked Tang's comparison of Vail
Village and Lionshead and added thatthat in itself says things
must be done differently in Lionshead.He did not see a real
hardship to grant a setback variance,and felt it would set a
precedent.He felt there was still room for compromise.
Pam said the situation reminded her of the Golden Peak House
and stated that for the good of the community,there must be
compromise.She felt that if rules were followed completely
all of the time,nothing would get done.She felt the
existing planter looked "anemic"and did not like the split
rail fence.She felt the plaza still needed a lot more done to
it.
Briner said that possibly one problem with Lionshead was that
there ~setbacks which made a sort of wasteland.
Jim Viele asked Rick what input had been gathered from the Town
Council and Rick responded that the Council was asked for
permission for the Lionshead Center to proceed with their
application since it included Town land.The Council did give
permission,but was concerned about the west end.
Jim stated that since the Board looked at the proposal about a
year ago,it had,in general,improved.He stated that this
building was as visible as any building in Lionshead.He felt
the pUblic spaces were not planned nor controlled in Lionshead,
and pointed out that Vail Village did have vast expanses of
hardness.Jim felt the proposal came very close to something
he would support.He felt it was most important to add large
trees near the stairs on the west end and felt this would do a
lot to offset the removal of the trees to the east of the
stairs.Also,with the addition of other landscaping,he could
support the proposal.
Diana asked if the underground expansion could be proposed
without the expansion above ground,and Briner reminded her
that she wanted the tree roots to go all the way down.
Nancy Nottingham,VA employee in charge of the Children's
center,pointed out that one thing to be considered was that
they had a need for mall frontage.Another item to be
considered was a change in the entrance to Alfie Packer's.She
said the underground space was not as important to her.She
was hoping the building would go further south,and possibly
put the adult ski school downstairs and put the children
upstairs.
Pam moved to approve the request for the exterior alteration,
Grant seconded.The discussion continued.Viele felt there
should be some fairly detailed discussion involving the
landscaping,and stated that he would like to hear a more
specific proposal that responds to the concerns of the PEC.
Peter recommended that the PEC see a revised landscape plan and
Jim agreed.Peter added that when we attempt to redesign a
project,it is always beneficial to take bring back the
revisions to ensure that everyone understood the changes to be
made.sid stated that he would like to table the issue in
order to see the revised landscape plan.Pam stated that she
would withdraw the motion,but wanted the applicant to know
that there was no problem with the building.
sid moved and Diana seconded to table this issue to June 27 or
July 11 upon timely receipt of revisions.The vote was 5-0 in
favor of tabling.Peter summarized that the only problem left
to deal with was the landscaping of the west end,and the PEC
would like to see a revised landscape plan.
Community Development Department
1 (.S f'6")
u·,,\\::v \
l--~ec0 C.,,"'~
/,-<.:J (--t-e-.6c\<)T"..D t-if?-l 'f
'<.¥f-«-7f.,c;:..t-r J 33~~
~\
-------.."
'3\,0
~\lD ~"<.»c:E":l ::J c.KrA-~r
i--lvV'-~\,,,,,;<d Ce.'"\....'~
•
NEXTTO THE BL'S sror
IN L10NSHE.~D MAll
4 76-60&4
10987
Purchase
10 Sandwiches
a nd the
11th o ne is o n us !
6
Please present card upon orde rtng !
5432I1
•
0000o0
0000F
TTTTT
T
TOHi·j
04 iJOU l'Q l'IEDt~ESDA'I':)
F.:ECE I PT #4:3322
I.)I.)
I)I)
I)A IL
COLORADO CAi·RJAS AI'JH I tiG CO ...I tiC .
399B s.ImJDEF.llEF.:E
EiJGLHIOOD..CO.80110
DE~;CF.:IPTIOiJ :
SIGN APPLICATIOi·JS FOR BC6ELLI
DELI :!,I)AIL CUSTO~l H1BF.:OIDER'r'
01 tnj(1l3414 i 3
TOTAL
CHECf:;#
8314
RECEIPT B\'
FDBD
_....--+-1·-t--I
7-0 «.
L_-
I--~----t---_+.--L
I II-r -;--+---;--.
dI @eU~@~~~@er;-''''
JOBNAME 130-'E:u-I S ::DE L I
JOBADDRESS _
CONTACT _
~-l-
I
t
I
I
--I-
J
I
-+-
1_J
J
...-
,
I __1
+
I
I
I
i
-+
i
SALESMAN PHONE _
•
r --1--+--1--+--+--+--+r
I--+-1--+-+--
I
I-r ---t--+--,-
I
PHONE
JOB ADDRESS _
CONTACT _
SALESMAN
iI
!
1_,-t-+-t--l--t--t---+-+--t---t-+--t--i-
T
I+-
PHONE
r-
I
i
JOB ADDRESS _
CONTACT _
SALESMAN
I
~
I
I
I
1/(1:f;~/-o
I rr -
I
--....-
I
I
I
1
I
i-
-'---
.-f-
~_.+
1 I
-1 r
I
I
I
--I-
I+4----
-r----t-~
•Project Application
Date 11 /4/A7
Project Name:BOSELLI I S DELI AWNING AND S 1GNAGE
fonnerlvPicn r:Bc;ket ,linn sh AProjectDescription:_-----'--"-'--"""-'--'-L...!.-'-"'''-'-'-'"'-''''''-':u:I..l::...l....o-1..-U.L'-=.I.<='-'-'-_
Contact Person and Phone od or Tom 80s 1]5
827-5742
}
Owner,Address and Phone :_
Architect,Address and Phone:
Legal Description :Lot Block Filing _-.-,Zone _
Signage total must
vinylcoated cotton
Ied3squarefeet~while letterinq on---------
DesignReviewBoard
11/4/87Date_---'----'_
,
((1
I
(I II })
I
L"J.
--I
Seconded by :__---=='-'-_----0..""--_+-_
Motion by :
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:_
TownPlanner
/1/1 /1"1Date:
I I
J ()/
o Staff Approval
•~eA'l'-f/---"-pp tcat ron ms .....er_
SIGN APPLIC ATIO N
..
Co [~Ca ...v o,.:::p--J"'.s (/'
FeePaid 1 1 /....../r 1 .
r r Da te 10/30/87
Name of Project Boselli 's Del ica tess en and Catering (currently Th~
Name of Person Submi tti ng La ne Bertrand(for Tom Phone ~-'-~-:'.J..-+=:::::
-Boselli)
Location of Project Lion '&Head (near bus stop)
Description o~_Pr9ject Recov er ex isting awning frame with new fabr ic and
s ignage and with frame x±alte ration .
The following information is required for submittal bythe applicant
to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given.
Sign submittal fee is $20 .00.
A.Sign Material Bimini 9546 (see sample -vinyl coated cotton)
B.Description of Sign Lettering c ente red on front f abric cover
to read I BOSELLI 'S DEL ICAT ESS EN AND CA TERIN G (see draw ing for l ayout)
C.Si z e of Si gn .......;:s:..:;e:..:;e.......;:d=.ra:;;.w...:i:.:n:.lig'--_
D.Length 'of Frontace(Ft.)14 '-0
Si gn Admi nistrator
E.Comments There is no substantial change to what 's already there .
The shap e of t hef ramewillbe ch angedfrom s tanda rd shed shape to
the quarte r circle or conv ex style .The over all s i ze of the a wning Xlll
an d s ignage wi ll rema in unch anged.
MAT ERIALS SUB ;·lITTED WIT HAPPLICATION
1.Site Plan
2.Dr-awi nqs showi nq exact location -..,...,...-_
3.Photographs showi nq proposed location _
4.Actual sign __~_
5.Colored scale drawlng
6.Pho tograph of sign _
Approved for ORB Subm ittal
Disapproved for ORB Submittal
Sign Administrator
....
..
\.......
i.;1r::
,....•e
Application r1Uhlber __--
SIGN APPLICATION
."
Phone '7f 'l-oS-ss
Da te -:.+-+.:::......:._L H-D:«L /
of Project 1/t f fJ1C ,vIc-8&-"'-1<£4 -
of Per son Su bmitt ing L/i-tJ/i-i?F.-fl..rYZ-/ITJb
IL/rJt-'.s l iF..A1;>Location of Project ----'--....:......;.:;;...:=--------
Name
Name
FeePa id _
Description o~,Pr~ject ;2ff c.uv &?-[f.)(IJ TJ.JC-~..,I'/;/t-~c
L-v f ryr IJ G-w WU c,v Lh rrFfi.,/o/{r-,
The following information is required for submittal by the applicant
to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given.
Sign submittal fee is $20.00.
A.Sign Material AwJ.;1"v(,-~I2..tL:$/#11'<'/1 9.J't~!2£--l:>.
B.Description of Sign fJO~/eL,~1l>!Z£.H:,:LION:S If-£.rD .})/5.'-1
(~l:>fJlh,..;n;-i)'v mT1Z.L £.;lff.J2-J ·)
C.Si ze of Sign _---====----=...:.........:-_
D.
E.
Length 'of Frontace (Ft.)
Comments L-0 C-!'r{70,J
7
/'-/.!-o,
.-
MATERIALS SUBi·tITTED WITH APPLICATION
Sign Admlnistrator
1.Site Plan
2.Drawtnqs s1'""h-o\-·I1,.-·n-g-ex-:"'a·ct location _.,__--.,-
3.Photographs showing proposed location _-,'~__
4.Actual sign
5.Colored scal-e-d;-r-a\-~l""'n~g-_
6.Photograph of sign _
Approved for ORB Submittal
Disapproved for ORB Submittal _
Sign Administrator
"
-.J
•
LANE BERTRAND
Sales Representative
Since1899
CS6U~(7acil@ @a~P.lGJgj ~tl~
3990S.W indermere
Englewood,Colorado 801I0
(303)789~533
-.
•"
•Project Application •.---.
Date 10/8/84
Project Name :-,~:=e:......:..P.:.1""c~n=-.!::.=~~c!:..:~:...:..:.!:~~~=~_
Project Description:~~~~::!!!J~~!a!!K~~~~_
Contact Person andPhone ---oX.:.:a:..:th=..::v---"W-"y.:r-",1-"c""---=-=c=~,,,,!-,,:!:,,!,~c.z:!~'--_
Owner,Address andPhone :_-:X.:..;a:...thy=---,e.::.-=.=..::~==-:~=~~=~:!....::~=..L::.L-'-..:~~~~~~~-!..~~~~
/
Architect,Address andPhone :
Legal Description :Lot Block Filing ,Zone _
Commen ts:I ron frlllll
.Motion by :
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
t
DesignReviewBoard
Date _-'---,-_
DISAPPROVAL
r \J
Date :
,
[]Staff Approval,
,.•
-r
~)J.(./"/L,»:
DATE OF PUBLIC HE ARING~__
INTER -DE PARTMEN TAL REVIE W
•
S,f0 <.J:.-o N ''T ~'"c::-f'C-o b """c:>...rr
f'Ott.SNO"";f"'-'oc ~Fi'=-Roo~
I/'7)5:#c wo J#}r.J (;=9l~
OVJ"J c -e:f...;/L '-..e~
VN D /:;Ic..~NIIVG
PUBLIC WOR KS
Rev iewed by :__-.,L---"=~-L-Date__~--:,-,--,--;--,=-
Co mmen ts:
(2);f~/V /,J (,
C o "'J c.~Q.rV ~
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Revie wed by :Date._
Comments:
POL ICE DE PARTMENT
Reviewed by:----:Datec--___
Comments:
.~.
..~'.
'.'./::'::i:·~t ;:~
.~..":{~::
..-....,,,".'
RECREATION DEPARTM ENT
Re viewed by:Da te._
Comments:
.'.-..
•
75 south f rontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)476 -7000
April17,1984
TO:SIG NAPPLICA NTS
•DF'de.Je ,II.,
I'JA-S..,<oJ s',-,or
office 01 community development
FROM:Tom Braun or Kristan Pritz ,Planners
RE :Sign Application Requirements
When appl ications for signs are submitted,the following information
i s r equi red:
1.Site plan showing exact location where thesign is tobe located .
2.Photog raph or drawing showing the building and wheresign is tobel ocated.
3.Exact de si gn of sig n (oneormoreofthefo 11 owi ng )
(a)scal edrawingor rendering (mustbecolored exactly'as signwill be)
(b)t hesign itself 'is made
(c)photograph if s ign i s made
FEE:A $2 0.00 app lication fee will be re quired at time of application .
••
·1 .~,..~,."•II\.--•'.
Application Numb er __
Phone 949-6449
1 0/8/84
SIGN APPLICATIO N
Date ------"--:...-.-------
Name ofProject The Picnic Easket/Awning-Si~nau,e
Name of Person Submitti ng Ka thy ',fyrick
Lo cation ofProject Lionshead Ma l l(Vail ,Co.)
Description of Project Storefront awning &Inentification
Fee
The following information is required for submittal bythe applicant
tothe Design Review Board before a final approval canbegi ven.
Sign submittal fe e is $20 .00.
A.Sign Material l,l hite fire -retar ~ant fabric sewn on awning
B.De sc rip tion 0 fSign _':...:''!'c.:.;hc::e-'P:...;i::..:c::..:n;:.::ic::c--=:;Ba::.;s::..:k::..:e:...:t-'''_
C.SizeofSign -'-.::.:-:.:..-----"~:...-.=---=-...>L::.:..-::=-_
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
Sign Adminis trator
1.SitePlan
2.Drawings s 'h-ow-l~'n-g-e -xact location
3.Photographs showing proposed loc-at~i~o-n-------
4.Actual sign
5.Co 10 r ed sca l-e-d'r-a-w""""'i-n-g-___
6.Photograph of sign _
Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB Submittal
••LIS T OF MATER IALS
NAME O~PRO JECT:1J..~PC.AJ/~ZS19s 4T
LEGAL DESCRIP TION:LOT BLOCK FIL I NG
STRE ET ADDRESS:I,/(>I,JS hEfrP-M.....-:;"A--/",--------
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The followinginformation i sreq uired for submittal by the applicant tothe Desi gn Re view
Board beforea final approvalcanbef iven:
A.BUILDING MATERIALS :TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windo ws
Window Tri m
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Dec k Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enc losures
Gree nhouses
~j)fJJ tJlI/f1J
B.LANDSCAPING:Na me of D esigner~
phone:
PLA NT MATERIALS:Botanical Name Co mmon Na me Quanity Size*
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO ___
BE REMOV ED
*I ndicate caliper fordeciducious trees.Indicate height for conifers.
•
PLANT MATERIALS:Botanical Name
(con't)
SHRUBS
EX I STI NG SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
Corrrnon Name
•
Quanity Size
Square Footage
TYPE OR METHOD OF _
EROS ION CONTROL
•
C.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swimming pools,etc.)Please specify.
.....'.
•
•
,I
..i
:'!:
,
i..,
,
"._.,.
"
.':.
,..l ·'.'
",~.:~::~'-;:.
..,..
I '
,,
,j I
,
,I
,r-:
..I I '::••••'
.....;,.,
';,
.i ,,
'!'.
I
.·r--').;
,..
d '•
-l--------'.
,-
.,-I
5 '6'(
I
I
i
'I
7'0 "
••Of••
L Y"/
:<'8'/
...'
"
-S/f:'l!--PI?~lI!r-
/r»:
-roF-
i L-----========:Jt
..
Plc nlc Baskc;
[)[U ~SOU?s S.t..NDWIC HES
,,
I
I.
I•J
I
;,"..,
,.'.
I
J -•
•
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
May 13,1987
Mr.Tom Briner
Briner Scott Architects
143 East Meadow Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Re:L ionshead Center Building
Dear Tom:
•
officeofcommunity development
In your letter dated May 8,1987,you asked if you wou ld be
required to obtain a setback variance ,as you are proposing to
encroach 5 feet into the existing 10 foot setback .The answer
is yes,it is necessary to obtain a setback variance.However,
I believe Rick has already published for the setback variance
request.Enclosed are the two published descr iptions for the
project.If you feel that you are asking for more than the
original exterior alteration and setback variance,it would be
necessary to publish again.I have enclosed a Planning
Commission schedule that lists submittal deadlines and
meetings.Please be sure to keep these submittal deadlines in
mind if you are asking for variances beyond your original
request.
In respect to the architectural canopy,it is also necessary to
have the various Town departments approve the 2.5'-3.5'
encroachment on Town of Vail property.This encroachment would
be addressed at the Planning Commission level.The staff would
also present the encroachment request to the Town Council at a
work session for their review.
In addition,if your project is not approved by the November
deadline,I think you should resubmit an exterior alteration
proposal.At that time,a year will have passed since your
original submittal.It would be helpful as well as reasonable
to confirm that the project is still active.The submittal
••
deadline is November 30,1987.If the project is still
underway,you may simply re-submit the same applicat ion
materials.
Please call me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
~i~~rtr
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
Enclosure
•
75 south frontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
October 22,1987
Mr.Gary Swetish
Briner Scott Architects
143 East Meadow Drive
Vail,Colorado 81657
Re:L ionshead Center Building
Dear Gary:
L
officeofcommunity development
The Community Development Department staff has spent some time
reviewing your latest revisions to the Lionshead Center
Building proposal.We feel that the current design repres ents
positive direction in the evolution of this design and we wou ld
like to continue working toward formal application and review
of this project.
As evidenced by our demonstration with the Fire Department on
Monday,October 12th,there remains some work to be done to
resolve the conflict of the required fire lane.Asa staff,we
feel that the fire lane should be maintained by making mino r
adjustments to the proposed building as opposed to making
adjustments to the existing planter system.The Urban Design
Guide Plan shows some building expansion to the north.The
planter system and fire lane in the Lionshead Mall were
designed to that expansion.Your building line has encroached
further to the north than that detailed in the Urban Design
Guide Plan.The building line footprint appears to be a work-
able situation with regard to the fire lane.However,it is
the staff's position that there should be no encroachment of
building or of architectural design features over the property
line.We feel that minor adjustments to the building footpri nt
or a redesign of the awning system will resolve this problem.
••
If you have any further questions,or wish to discuss formal
submittal requirements,please contact me at 476-7000.I look
forward to moving ahead with this project.
Si~~1L~
Rick Pylman
Town Planner
RP:br
75southfrontageroad
vail,colorado81657
(303)476-7000
October7,1985
EustaquioCortina
231 Bridge Street
Vail,Co.81657
Dear Eustaquio:
officeofcommunitydevelopment
According to information inthe Town ofVail files regarding theLionshead
Center Building there is asof 10/2/85,3170 square feet of GRFA available
for residential development.Util ization of this available GRFA for intern al
improvements would require onlya building permit.Any additions or extern al
modifications tothe building would require Planning a nd Environ mental
Commi ssion approval for exterior alteration .
The Lionshead Urban Design Guideplan calls out for a possible one story commerci al
expansion for theLionsheadCenter Building.This designation allowswaiver
ofthe standard ten foot property line setbac k requi rement.Any building
e xpansion would require Planntng and Environmental Commission approval and
would bereviewed for conformance withtheLionsheaddesign considerations.
These design considerations area framework of urban design and architectural
guidelines,copteso f which are available from this office.
Ispokewith Gary Murrain,acting Building Official forthe Town of Vail,
regarding enclosure oftheparkinggarage.In order to enclose this area
there are ·two requirements that must bemet.The first is air handling
requirements as described in Section 705 ofthe Uniform Building Code.The
secondrequirement would be Fire Department concerns and I would suggest that
you deal directly withthe Fire Department relative t o those requirements.
If you have any further questions regarding this information,please feel
free to contact me at yourconvenience.
RP/blf
~_.......
.-~~-..-'--
-----------
-----~--r--~----i-'--'--,~
_.:-.-...........,.,...;..:...
•lis[es
"J=--'----....-.:..~---------
•
\;----_._-----
(\0 \0'"\W .,·q4-~_~,.....,,_G e..F~_
..'
-£lrT.,...."..c'-"':7:::Att-~:_:_:c:_c:_-----·-_=__-------------
~~:""'----'."-:-:--Hl--'---",""-'=""",,,,".:z.aJ>---~35 8'Y f---C ~""'8 .r ~L _
~__r+--"'-~-ttt --~.9t -\l~~"'--l9-4l'±e:t~---(O M_~.C::·,,~_
;-"''''';''-'''''''';'''''-fll ~-_-----'-.---.L0 ~~_~J~~'M.~~J --_'
_--I'-r/:d-~~---J~:l !d...""~L -...,..,,--
\\I ,~~L r'....s.'.d ~..J..,,1 _
~~·'--YJ..d:,d--:ll'dr'",-"!':~rd ~!!.~~{
,....•Project Application •
Da te __....:.-.:.....::.....-..!.-__~=-__
Pro ject Name :.>..l---=:.....:.----:..---"-''"--_--==-----::-::-----:::-:-_
1&
<"'t"f
Contact Per son andPhon e
Pro ject Descr iption:..:-.:..;---"..::'--_
Owner,Add ress and Phone :_--'-"_
Ar chitect ,Add ressan dPhon e :
______Filing ...;L-...:.C<:_--"_
C omments:_~~-'--'---'-_-'-:.:..::.-l.~:...-----.:.~----!-------------------------
Legal Description :Lot _
16 Q.t
DesignReviewBoard
Date _
Mo tion b y :
Secondedby :
APP ROVAL D ISAPPROVAL
Summary :_
(£]Staff App roval
I.•Project Application •
Date _
r
Project Name :----'-::-----:::--_
Project Description:_
Contact Person and Phone
Owner,Address and Phone:_
Architect ,Address andPho ne :
rLegalDescription:Lot ~Block ~Filing _l _
Comments:_--'---'_.:..-"-.:....:...--"'"~_
D esign Review Board
Date _
Motion by :
Seconded by :
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:_
Dal e :
T own Planner
f
o Staff Approva l
....
39432N9
\.......';".
\'.\,
\I ',"\.
'""RECEIVED FROM -------',c-r'---"-'--'--'----'----'--'-----------
ADD RESS _
~~--------------~-------------------~------------------
\RECEIPT -TheTownofVail .-.
"-),.
-.:,--DOLLARS S {~t../.
'1 •
\
Poli ee Re c ei ~t Numbe rs _
/
1.i'-f /\..By -'---,.----'-_
e ',',.....'.+-
HOW PAlD-Cash Check _
Permit Numbers _
,.,
p
•..",."
""e;.-.:i 'r....·.-•Application Number __
Jf)-f;/fC
7
Phone Lftb -(,Jt%
Da te ----'--'----=-f--"~=--
SIGN APPLICATION~u .....-Fee Paid 6T"_.:::.-_---
Name of Project '1J (j1-tt ~TS.
Name ofPerson Submitting ::UbY\\4W'a
Locationof Project UOI\JDO d (i~J\
Description of Project ~~~~jzf-----------------
The following information is required for submittal by the applicant
tothe Design Review Board beforea final approvalcanbegiven.
Sign submittal feeis$20.00.
A.Sign Material \,vDod·
B.Description ofSign _
C.SizeofSi gn ---~...:::._.J5----'~-·_._
D.Length 'ofFrontaae .....(.:...F.><..t.w)'---....:..\.:...(,'-·._
E.Comments __---------------------
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
Sign Administrator
1.Site Pl an .---.---2.Drawings showing exact location ~~_
3.Photographs showing proposed location --------4.Actualsign _~~_
5.Colored scale drawing _
6.Photograph ofsign_
Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB Submittal_
Date --=--.!.-~.:::..-_
•Project Application
___-=--__'v:.---.:...'\~'-1V'-\-"'_·__-1..-...:....--:...-~"---_.:::.....:--'==::::-__Contact Personand Phone
Project Description:-=_...L....:'--=--~_
Owner,Address and Phone:_
Architect,Address and Phone:
Legal Description :Lot __...:..-,Zone _
"S c,I
/
If.....
..
DesignReviewBoard
Date _
Motion by :
Seconded by :
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:_
mStaff Approval
••
?>""
RECEIPT -TheTown of Vail
N<!39433
\,\.
\}',\,-'\(
\
-,
RECEIVED FROM -_---;-_'----'-"__----"-~__.:>..L..::.'_____>.._
ADDRESS _
,
:'
\,
PermitNumbers _
HOW PAID-Cash .Le__Check_
Police Receipt Numbe rs _
'''''J"I -,•\.-,'By.L-_'-.:::-~._
,,17 ------------------------------------------------------------
•~~Appl ication Nu mber ----
SIGN APPLICATION
Phone
Date 1-/)-8-/(>'6
ef?0 -6~L-",f+('-"-!""'---
C~~
D-p
Fee Paid _
The following info rmationi s r equ ired for submitta l by t he applic ant
tothe Design Review Board before a final approvalcanbegiven.
Sign submittal fee is $20.00.
A.SignMaterial _
B.Descri ption ofSign _
D.Length ofFrontage (Ft.))6
E.Co mments._~---_
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICA TION
Sign Administ rator
1.Site Plan
2.Drawings s 'ho-w'i~ng---e--xac t locatio n
3.Photo graphs s howing pr op osed loc-a~tl~·o-n-------
4.Actualsign
5.Coloredscal-e-d'r-aw-l,-·n-g-_
6 .Photo graph of si gn _
Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB Submittal_
Si gn Administrator
\
,/•Project Application •
Date _-'-"'-'---'-.,..:.....:..:...:=-_
Project Name :....:./'~N':.:AO~:L.::./~_='____..L:=~~!:2.~.:!..._~.:..__2L===___
Project Description :--,-E=";'---..:~!..!:..!..:...:~:""'-_=l.L.!C...:~~_---,~:..<2.~~==C-.!:-!.:.L:::2!..!!..!C!.:...._~~~_
Contact Personand Phone _/:::.-~.!:H:.....:::!!::;!==-----,~~~=~~L..--=~e.t:;'-=-'~:'=:"..!2 _
Owner.Address and Phone :~---=:"'::=L..!.L:::...._~=.:::!..o:~::::.!:::zd~~_
Architect,Address and Phone :_~Jl"7'/-"Ll,,-_
Legal Description:Lot "Block ~Fi ling ,Zone _
DesignReviewBoard
Date _---...:~...:....2.L~~------
Motion by :
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
y )
)
~
I'
I
Summary:.:..-.:..-.....:..._----::.-:L .....:..!.!...!__--'-_
rot 1"'"'-
SQ.'€.-VV\~r-------
_______~\V
Date :
o Staff Approval
,.,••APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF ORB MEETING:
ORB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBHITTED*****
I.PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application meetingwithaplanning staff member is strongly suggestedto
determine if any additional information isneeded.No application will beaccepted
unless it iscomplete (must include all items re quired by thezoning administrator).
It is the applicant's responsibili ty to make anappointmentwiththe staff tofind
outabout additional submittal requirements .Please note that a COMPLETE applica-
tion will streamline theapprovalpr ocess f or your project by decreasing the number
of conditions ofapproval that the ORB may stipu late.ALL conditions ofapproval must
be resolved beforea building permitis issued.
A.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:71h 6 Ea S7FPS o v ~k:A=r L""A5;'--,;=;..07>
B.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Legal Description Lot Block Fili ng _
telephone 4'76'-/700
Zoning _
C.NAME OF APPLI CANT:?'#-A(2,Uc kc6-<y :P!d-ip
Address ,15<;.":;-/i4
D.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPR ESENTATIVE:_
Address telephone_
E.NAME OF OWNERS:"t'-/"q-Y'2m-=A2f?C ?,vT!?r r'_<,;uc>t4 :5 ~'"C'
Signature _
Address .te lephone _
F.ORB FEE:The fee will bepaid at thetimea building permit is requested.
VALUATION FEE
$o-$10.000 $10.00
$10.001-s 50.000 $25.00
$50,001 -$150,000 $50.00
$150.001-$,500.000 $100.00
$500,001 -$1.000,000 $200.00
s Over $1.000.000 $300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDI NG ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE ORB:
1.In addition tomeeting submittal requirements,the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners.Trees that will be removed
should also be marked.This work must be completed beforethe ORB visits the
site.
2.The reviewprocessfor NEW BUILDINGS will normallyinvolve two separate meetings
ofthe Design Review Board.soplan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3.People who fail toappearbef ore the Design Review Board at their schedu led
meeting and who have notaskedf ora postponement wi ll be required tobe
republished.
••
4 .The following i tems no longer have tobe presented tothe Design Revie w Board.
They,however,have tobeprese nted tothe Zon ing Adm inistrator for approva l:
a.Windows,skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing planeofthe building;and
b.Bu i lding additions that arenot viewed fro m any other lot or publicspace,
which have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition;and/or approval from theagent for,or managerofa condo minium
association.
5 .You maybe required toconductNatural Hazard Studies on your property.You should
checkwitha Town Plannerbefore proceeding.
I.NEW CO NST RUCTIO N
•
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
•
A.Topographic map and site planof site containing thefollowing(2 copies):
1.Licensed surveyor's stamp.
2.Contour intervals ofnot more than2'unless the parcel consists of6 acres or
more,in which case,5'contour intervals will be accepted.
3.Existing trees orgroupsof trees havingtrunkswith diameters of 4"or more
one foot above grade.
4.Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders ,
intermittent streams,etc.).
5.Avalanche areas,100 year flood plain and slopes 40%ormore,if applicable.
6.Tiestoexisting benchmark,either USGS landmark orsewer i nvert.
7 .Locationsofthe following:
a .Proposed surface drainage on and off site showing size andtypeof
culverts,swales,etc.
b.Exact locations of all utilities to include existing sources and proposed
service lines from sourcestothe structure.Utilities to include:
cable TV
Telephone
sewer
water
gas
electric
c.Property lines showing distances and bearings and a basis ofbearing
d.Proposed drivewayswith percent slope and spot elevations
e.Alleasements
8.Existing and finished grades.
9.Alle xist ing and proposed improvements including structures,landscapedarea s,
service areas,storage areas,walks,driveways,off-street parking,loading
areas,retaining walls (with spot elevations),and other site improvements.
10.Elevat ions oftopofroof ridges (withexisting grade shown underneath)to
determine height of building .
B.A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability .To
be submitted with site plan.
C.Preliminary title report to accompany all submittals,to insure property ownership
and all easements on property.
D.Landscape Plan (1"=20'or large r)-2 copies
1.Show the location of 4"diameterorl.arqe rvtrees vo ther 'shr ubs cancr ii iifi ve plants the
areonthe site and the location and designofproposedlandscape areas with
the varieties and approximate sizes of plant materials tobe planted.~
2.Complete landscape materials list.
3 .Designate trees tobesaved and thosetobe lost.
NOTE :As much ofthe above information as possible shouldoccur on the site plan,so that
the inter-relation ofthe various components is clear.The landscapeplanshouldbe
separate.The exist ing topographic and vegetat ional characteristics may bea separate
map .The applicant must sta ke the site to show lot lines and building corners .Trees
that will be lost during construction must betagged .The work shouldbecompleted
before the DRB site visit.
•E.Architectural Plans(1/8"=I'or larger)2copies •
1.Must include floor plans and all elevations asthey will appearon completion.
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades.
2.Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be specified and submitted for
review on the materials list available from the Department of Community Develop-
ment.Color chips,siding samples etc.,shouldbe presented at the Design Review
Board meet ing.
F.The Zoning Administrator and/or DRB may require thesubmissionof add itional plans,
drawings,specifications,samples and other material (including a model)if deemed
necessary todeterminewhethera project will comply withdesign guidelines.
II.MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photosor sketches that clearly indicate what i s proposed and the location (site plan)
ofproposal may besubmittedin lieu ofthe more formal requirementsgivenabove,as
long astheyprovide all important specifications for theproposed including colors and
materials tobeused .
III.ADDITIONS -RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A.Original floor planswith all specifications shown
B.Floorplan for addition -2copies
C.Site plan showing existing and proposed construction -2copiestopos
D.Elevations of addition
E.Photosof existing structure
F.Specifications for all materials and color samples on materials list available at
Department of Community Development
Atthe request ofthe Design Review Administrator you may also be required to subm it:
G.Statement from each utility verifying location of service and availab ility.See
attached utility location verification form.
H.Site improvement survey,stamped by registered professional surveyor.
I .Preliminary title report,verifying ownershipof property and lists ofeasements .
IV.FINAL SITE PLAN
Afte r a building permithas been issued,and when the project is underway,thefollowing
will be required beforeany building receives aframing inspection from theBuilding
Department:A certified improvement survey showing :
A.Building locations with ties to property corners,i.e.distances and angles.
B.Buildingdimensionsto nearest tenth of foot.
C.All utility service lines as-builts showing size of lines,typeof material used,
and exact locations .2copies
D.Drainage as-builts.2copies
E.Basisofbear ing to tie to section corner.
F.Allproperty pins are tobe either found or set and stated on map.
G.Alleasements
H.Building floor elevations and roof ridge elevations.
•LI ST OF r·IATER IA LS •NAM E OF PRO J EC T:
LEGAL DESCRIP TIO N:--LOT------B rOCK :FILI i{G-
STREET ADD RE SS:
DESCRIPTION OF PR OJ EC To
-:--------------
-------
Th e f ol low i ng i nfor ma ti on is r e quired for s ubmi tt albyth e a ppli ca nt t o t he De sign Re vi ew
Board bef or e af i na l approva l c a n be f ive n :
A.BUI LDING MATE RIALS:
Roo f
Siding
Othe r Wa l l Materi al s
Fascia
Soff it s
Win dow s
Wi ndowTrim
Do ors
Doo r Tr i m
Ha ndor De ckRa i l s
Flue s
Fl ashi ng s
Chi mneys
TrashEnc los ure s
Greenho use s
Othe r
TYP E OF MATERIA L
---------------
CO LOR
A1t471 1!?AL
B.LA NDSCAPIN G:Na me of De sig ner :
ph on e :
PLAN T MATER IALS:Botanica l Na me
PROPO SED TRE ES
---------
EX ISTI i:G TREES TO
BE RmO VED
--------
COITmon Nam e
___0 __-
Qua nity Si ze*
*I nd ica te ca li pe r fo r deciduc i ous tr e es .I lldi cate heigh t fO I"cOlli fel"s.
(o \'er )
•
.PLA NT ~1A T ER IA LS :Botanical Name
(can't)
SH RUBS
EXISTI NG SHR UBS
TO BE REMOVED
GRO UND COVERS
SOD
SEE D
TYPE OF
IRR IG ATION
Co mmon Na me
•
Quanity Si ze .
Squ areFootage
TYPE OR METHOD OF _
EROSI ON CONT ROL
C.OTHER :LAN DSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swimm ing pools,etc.)Pleas e specify .
..,.
••
..
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVISION--------------------------
JOB NAME _
LOT ....:BLOCK.....:FILING _
ADDRESS--------'--------------
The location of utilities,whether they bemain trunk lines or proposed
lines,mustbe approved and verified by the following utilities for the
accompanying site plan.
Mountain Bell
1-634-3778
Western Slope Gas
Harry Moyes
Public Service Company
Gary Hall
*Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
VailCableT.V.
Gary Johnson
Upper EagleValley Water
and Sanitation Discrict
David Krenek
Authorized Signature Date
*For new cons'
___please fill au'
attached sheet
NOTE:These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his
responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the
Town of Vail,Department of Public Works and to obtain
utility locations before digging in any public right-
of-way or easement in the Town of Vail.A building permit
is not a street cut permit.A street cut permit mustbe
obtained separately.
This form is to verify service availablity and location.
This should be used in conjunction with preparing your
utility plan and scheduling installations.
/
.,-••
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR ,R,R PIS ZON E DISTRICTS
DA TE:
LEGAL =-D=ES'""'C=R"=""'IP=T=I=ON""":---"-Lo--'t~-=B1ock Fi1i ng
ADDRESS :----
OWN ER Phone
ARC HITECT Ph 0 ne --------------
ZO NED IST'''R'-;IC""'T,.----------------------------------------
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Height
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GR FA
Setbacks :Front
Sides
Rear
Wate r Cours e
Site Coverage
Landscapin g
Fence/Retaining WallHeights
Parking
eredi ts:Garage
Mechanica l
Airlock
Storage
Solar He at
Allowed
(30)(33)
20'
15'
15'
(30)(50)
(300)(600)
(900)(1200)
(50)(l00)
(25)(50)
(200)(400)
Proposed
Drive:SlopePermitted SlopeActual _
Environmental/Hazards:Avalanche --------------------
Flood Plain _
Slope _
Wetlands _
Geologic Hazard s _
Comments:
Zoning :Approved/Disapproved
Date :
Staff Signature
:'t :
..
~..'.
~.'\t
•I
."
.-
/,
."
-.
e .
....
,\\.1
cL
\-
+-r.
"I\U
',)•
\"
~
I ~,
U.l
...
L \ll
~
I -:!:....
.-:1.
~'~+~.
.~~
,~
....i.
.:.::l ...
,.
.--
"~;
.-
~,~
-.,
{I,.,
.'.
,
~
....;..
..
\.
/'
•1+.0'
I
.
,,
.~-_.
10/8/84Date_-'-''---''___
Project Application ••.-
Project Name :-=_-"'---'-'-'----'-=-__'___'__-'-''---'--'--''=-'----''-'-'-_
storefront awning &i~na~eProjectDescription:_~:..:..:.:..:..::..::.:.:....:-=.==~~==='--_
Contact Person and Phone r.~ob Deluca 47~.;322
Salle as aboveOwner,Address and Phone:__--==:..::......-=-=:....=..::.::...:....::0._
Architect,Address andPhone:
\
Legal Description :Lot Block Fil ing ,Zone _
Comments:Iron framed storefront awninll:fire retardant in bUTrnndv wi g old mylar laminate
s1gnage •4 .25 s q ft
DesignReviewBoard
Date ---:-:-::-__
...
I~
DISAPPROVAL
,~-/"
,'\...
---t 1'1
I I I ,
l ~-I /1.-'A
....~\(
Motion by :
Staff Approvalr
---
Dat e :
Summary:-'--'-'-'-.:.:J.:....:.....--''--..,.--'--....:......--'-----'-'-''-'--''-----:.-'----=--~---=----'--'--_:___:7-----
_.__----,4 i
·"..,.....1 \--------_._-_._-_...__.-.------.._..
I7...--._-
Original Designs InFineJewel....._._../..---.-:'--"..__>........._',_.'-A :.:~".-.~.:...../-=.
7~"
---
~_.--------_.-..~_..~..._~--¥.-..-.._.-._.,.---
<
~-._--_..-------.
I
._--.---.,-'._-'-
4 ~•\l ~
-~-.:;;
~,
\))
~I:]-,
\)\rJ
~
"V)..
!~,
n -,~~
'v\1\\:~~\.I
.J ::
•
~O 'I
....~<5~{cl/w/L!l~bO){\)&tkJ''1-.
Original Designs InFine Jewelry~'f·'.~"BROl()N
-+_.~
75'"'1
•••
I
2,/'1
r,E-"lD
~-,f -
I '-?-------.:J,L/I :;o I
50"
/2''7"
I
__A-j 'A-.A..~._~..A.---"_",---"----'_'-__---"'"'--_---"'"_"--'~-r
-------------------,f
A.-A-..A _--_of
J .LI?.gil i9'0"
t
I
150"
I
A J\.__"-_".__J,__;'__.J\--...J\-_-"--"-~~-1
r ---_---------~
I'--.....---A----~+----~J r /:-j //-~7 f,"f-
••
I NTER-DEPhRTME NT AL REVI EW
J~...,~NJ"';G
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING~__
PROJECT:Cv ~..,...(
DATE SUBMITIED:_
COMMEN TS NEEDED BY :___
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC WORKS
Rev ;ewe d by :_----::~.:.__:....Da te
Co mme nts:
(j)
FIRE DEP ART ME NT
Rev;ewed by:Date._
Co mments :
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Re vi ewe d by:Da te'---_
Comments:
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:Date._
Comments:
.-..
•
75 south frontage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476 -7000
•
officeof community development
BUILD ING PER t·1n I SSUA NCE TIME FRMIE
If thi s permi.t requi res a To wn of Va il Fire Depa r tment Ap proval,
Engineer"s (Public Works)reviewand approval,a Planning Department
review orHealthDepartment review,anda revi ew by the Building
Department,the estimated time for a total review may take aslong
as three weeks.
Allcomme rcial (large or small)and all multi-famil y permits will
havet o follow th e abovementioned maximum requirements .Residential
and sma ll projectss houldtakea lesser amount of time.However,if
res tdent ial Or small er projects impactthe various abovementioned
depa rtments with regard to necessary review,these projects may
also take th e th ree week period.
Every attem pt will be made by this department toexpedite this
permi't assoonas possible.
I,the undersigned,understand theplancheck procedure andtime
frame .
O&fEAJ~&''''I'0jProjectName
Date l{o rk 'Sh eet vias t urned into th e
Com mu nit y Develo pment Departmen t.
I ~<6:ll>-
•
..
1 0
'~,
i ,•~•
App 1i cat ion Number _
1 0/8/84Date---=:~::...t....:._
SIGN APPLICATION
Paid !v.toFee
Na me of Project Curr ents Awning -Sip:nage
Name ofPerson Submitting -.::lvlur~.;.;n p~ll..Ju.....c,""a~_Phone 47(,-3322
Ti QD sn ea g ~a ll ~ail ,r.oLocationofProject_..l....:.,;~'-'="""-~~.:.......::..:=..=..:...L-~_
Description of Project storefront a wninll:&signage
The following information is required for submittal bythe applicant
totheDesign Review Board before a final approval canbe given.
Sign submittal fee is $20.00.
A.Sign Material ~a'n m y'~r )~m i na t e lettering velcro to awning
Bur~undy fire retardant awning fabric
B.Description ofSign "Currents "Ori ginal De si~ns InFine Jewe lry
fine ;ewe
riginal designs in
D.Co mnents Store frontage is 21 linear feet +9"
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
Sign Administrator
1.Site Plan .-~__
2.Drawings showing exact location
3.Photographs showing proposed loc~a·t~io~n---
4.Actual sign _~~__
5.Colored scale drawing_
6.Photographof sign _
Approved for ORB Submittal
Disapproved for ORB Submittal
••
•LIST OF MATER IALS •....II
re re
-,,-FILING _
NA ME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ST REET ADD RESS:~DESC RI PTI ON OF PRO"JE=";'C~T""':.....,...........~""-'-~~--'-"""'-=-'----r.:.~--;:--,....,.--.-----;rr-::"=-:=
The followinginformation is required for submittal by the applicant tothe Design Rev iew
Board beforea final a pprova lcanbe fiven:
A.BUILDI NG MAT ERIALS:TYP E OF MA TE RIAL COLOR
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windo ws
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Dec k Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimne ys
TrashEnclosures
Greenhouses
Other fire retardant canvas Burgundy
gold mylar laminate
B.LA NDSCAPI NG:Name ofDesigner:
phone:
PLANT MATERIALS:Botanical Name Com mon Name Quanity Size*
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO ___
BE REMOVED
*Indicate caliper fordeciducioust rees.Indicate height fo r conifers.
."
.....••
PLANT MATERIALS:Botanical Name
(con't)
SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
Common Name Quanity Size
Square Footage
TYPE OR METHOD OF _
EROS ION CONTROL
a
C.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swimming pools,etc.)Please specify.
-~\----
Contact Personand Phone
•Project Application -".
Owner,Address and Phone:-,-r~~~~'-!....
Architect,Address and Phone:_
Legal Description:Lot Block ~Filing ,Zone _
Comments:_
DesignReviewBoard
Date _
Motion by :
Seconded by :_
APPROVAL
Date:
D ISAPPROVAL
o St aff Approval
..
Project Application
I
Date q-//-
/
Project Description:A /..(>-'1/-1 ~(_r"nyr .I t5 .
4t7'<-/7or)
Owner,Address and Phone:__$..oyo-?x:::>::..:...L..<:-:....-_
Architect,Address and Phone:_A...J=""L:.::::4 _
Legal Description :Lot .Block ~Filing ,Zone _
rr»~XI -r r.c »c::
DesignReviewBoard
Motion by :
Seconded by :
Dat e :
APPROVAL
Town Plann er
Date _---'-"'-'+-'-!'-'--+-_
DISAPPROVAL
•
75 south frontage road
vail ,colorado 81657
(303)·476-7000
October24,1984
Cha rlie Langmaid
Gondola Ski Shop
Box 159
Vail,Colorado 81658
Dea r Charlie,
•
officeofcommunity development
Re:Charlie's Gondola Awning
I wanted to write youa letter toconfirm the approval of your new awning
by Town Council on October16,1984.The agreement included:
-The red and white awning will notextend past the first support
poleout from thewallofthe building.
-Theyellow awnings will be removed and r eplaced by red and white
awnings as soon as possible .
tThe awning willbe reviewed by June1,1985 to determine if the layout
ofthe awning has created snow removal problems.(staff review)
-Signage on the existing awning will be applied onthe new awning.
If you have any further questions,please give me a call.
Sincerely,
~\~~~~
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
•
~o_~::::'--.~~~~~_
DBte-------__Tlme -----
W~~~W~T .
M g~l ~f'</f
of---------cr---------
L(76 -/7ooPhone----L----L-::::..-----L-<.....::;.-:::::..-_
Area Code Number Extension
OpeTllor
denver
englewood
vail
751 -0888
790-0337
949 -4660
....
;'.,
/
TO:
FROM:
DATE :
-
Town Council
October 16,1984
white awning located in front
The owner agreedto remove
benoted that the original
SUB JECT:Charlie 's Go ndo la Ski Shop Aw ning:Lionshead CentreBuilding
1 6'(lAi~Ul\'~l\mJ
The owner of Cha rlie 's Gondola Ski Shop is appea ling the decision oftheORB
to deny theproposalto erect an awning in front oftheski shop's entrance.
On October 3.1984.the ORB deniedthe awning for thefollowing reasons:
1.The awning created a snow removal problem.
2.The awning's length was notcompatiblewiththedesignofthe recently
~ompleted Lionshead Mall Improveme nt program.
BAC KG ROUND
Originally,the Gondola Ski Shop had ayellow and
ofthe shop's entrance beforemall construction .
the awning to facilitate construction.It should
awning was never approved by the Town.
Once themall construction was finished,the owner wished to replace the original
awning.However,instead of ayellow and white awning,the proposed awning
would be off-white and red.The style of awning would match theprevious awning.
The original awning extendedapproximately 23 feet from theent rance outto
thesidewalk.Lionshead Centre Building's property line extends20 feet out
fro m t he s ki shop entrance.The refore,the original awning was approximately
3 feet into the public right-of-way.In order to make theproposed awning compati-
blewiththe new mall design,the owner agreedtoreducethe length ofthe awning
to 16 feet.The support poles would be located approximately 13 feet from the
building and the awning would cantilever out3 additional feet.The 16 foot awning lines
up withthe new lights installed in front oftheskishop(see attached site plan).
The owner had agreedto go to Design Review Board onOctober 3,1984.However,
approximatelya week and a half before the meeting,staff was informed that
the original frame for the awning was almostcompletely erected in front of
thes ki shop.The shop employee requested that the frame beallowedto remain
and that theyellowandwhiteawning beused temporarily.Staff agreedto this
req uest.Later,the owner requested that thered and off-white awning beused
becausetheyellow awning had been damaged dur ing storage.The owner felt that
an awning shouldbe on the frame for the upcoming VailFest weekend.Staff
also agreedto this request.
Atthe Design Review Board meeting,the members felt that the awning should
be moved back toa point where snow removal problems couldbe eliminated.It
was also stated that the awning was notcompatiblewiththe new lighting located
in f rontofthe Lionshead CentreBuilding and that perhapsa new style of awning
would be more appropriate.The motion was made by Stev e Caswell to deny the
•Awning -2-10/16/84
request.The motion was seconded by Rick Baldwin.The request was denied
3-0.
Staff recommends that a cantilevered awning (an awning that doesnot require support
poles)beused.This would enablePublic Works to do athoroughjobof snow
removal.Even if theproposed awning is cutback,the snow remov al proble m
will r emain,asthe snow plow will notbe able to plow between the awning support
poles and light poles.Aprimaryconcernduring the Lionshead Mall Impro veme nt
designprocess was to reconstruct themallso that snow plowing would be facilitated.
In addition,the DRB and staff think that theproposed awning detracts from
thedesignofthe mall,particularly in respect tothe new lighting plan.
The walkway is also more congesteddueto the close -proximity of }ight poles
and awning support poles.Staff strongly encourages the Town -Council to visit
-the gite toget ""a better -understanding ofthe issue."~
\
•
y ,;,
'"
-
SL~lf:11f~10'
---.~
I
I
I
CHARL ES 1.LA"G 'IAID
Plu,m"r
SKI SHOP
t:
1I 0 ~"H l A ()MALL VAIL .COLORADO 816>8
•--.',
I
I
~~"J
":l::~,,
~.,-,t .,
...J ",
I.L .0-:,'j'
0
~:~<',
t.;(,',!,
.:J ',
...!)
,\
"
~:2
t-:~'2 ...-~-r>,a
..J-I~\
c:;D o,
~1.U
d.~.I\
~g /6 ft ·
\1J ~$(.Ifl~AA>UI~GU~
a
4:I~
\f)
'2 I0-J
.I
I
I
$c..tt..l E:I"~10'I--.}W~
CHARLlS ~.LANGMAID
P R [~I Dl :'\T
S KI SHOP
-
~+s
'.
BOX159 1I0.'lSHlAD M ALL VA IL C OLORADO 61656 13031 476·1700
~~~-""~/o ,:;")'
*
SKI SIIOP
BOX159 •1I0NSHEAD MML •VAil,COLORADO 81f_18
;'
.....
-
TO:
..
Town Council
•
FROM:Community Development Department
DATE:October16,1984
SUBJECT:Charlie 's Gondola Ski Shop Awning:Lionshead CentreBuilding
The owner of Charlie's Gondola Ski Shop is appealing the decision ofthe DRB
to deny theproposalto erect an awning in front oftheski shop's entrance.
On October3,1984,the DRB deniedthe awning forthefollowing reasons:
1.The awning created a snow removal problem.
2.The awning's length was notcompatiblewiththedesignofthe recently
completed Lionshead Mall Improvement program.
-v-,
BACKGROUND ·
Originally,the Gondola Ski Shop had ayellow and white awning located in front
ofthe shop's entrance beforemall construction.The owner agreedto remove
the awning to facilitate construction.It shouldbenoted that the original
awning was never approved by the Town.
Once themall construction was finished,the owner wished to replace the original
awning.However,instead ofayellow and white awning,the proposed awning
would be off-white and red.The style of awning would match theprevious awning.
The original awning extendedapproximately 23 feet from the entrance outto
thesidewalk.Lionshead Centre Building's property line extends 20 feet out
from theski shop entrance.Therefore,the original awning was approximately
3 feet into the public right-of-way.In order to make theproposed awning compati-
blewiththe new mall design,the owner agreedtoreducethe length ofthe awning
to 16 feet.The supportpoles would be located approximately13 feet from the
building and the awning would cantilever out3 additional feet.The 16foot awning lines
up withthe new lights installed in front oftheskishop (see attached site plan).
The owner had agreedto go to Design Review Board onOctober3,1984.However,
approximatelya week and a half before themeeting,staff was informed that
the original frame for the awning was almostcompletely erected in front of
theskishop.The shop employee requested that the frame beallowedto remain
and that theyellow and white awning be used temporarily.Staff agreedto this
request.Later,the owner requested that thered and off-white awning be used
becausetheyellow awning had been damaged during storage.The owner felt that
an awning shouldbeonthe frame for the upcoming VailFest weekend.Staff
also agreedto this request.
At the Design Review Board meeting,the members felt that the awning should
be moved back toa point where snow removal problems couldbe eliminated.It
was also stated that the awning was notcompatiblewiththe new lighting located
in front ofthe Lionshead CentreBuilding and that perhapsa new style of awning
would be more appropriate.The motion was made by Steve Caswell to deny the
••~ing -2-10/16/84 --\
request.The motion was seconded by Rick Baldwin.The request was denied
3-0.
Staff recommends that a cantilevered awning (an awning that doesnot require support
poles)be used.This would enable Public Works todoathoroughjobof snow
removal.Even if the proposed awning is cut back,the snow removal problem
will remain,asthe snow plow will notbeableto plow between the awning support
poles and light poles.Aprimaryconcernduring the Lionshead Mall Improveme nt
designprocess was to reconstruct the mallso that snow plowing would be facilitated.
In addition,the ORB and staff think that theproposed awning detracts from
the design ofthe mall,particularly in respect to the new lighting plan.
The walkway is also more congestedduetothe close -pro ximity of ~ight poles
and awning support poles :Staff strongly encourages the To~n -Co ~nc il to vis it
-the site toget--a better understandin-g of the issue.-'''-
"....
,.•I.
I
~'J,'
~>~
~ri ~-..,J t',..,
,".'
\L.,:.-''~1 1 'I
0 'j"
~",
~J"
",I
'k '~I
.::J .,
"".
~;2
r'2 ....
t5 ~
..J-I~\
(X)a..
~l.u
d.~,I~s /6 ft .
\1J ~A~I~(:)U ~..~IST~
a
<C I~
V')
'"2 I0-J
Su..lf :I'I::10'
--t l-Wtrt1
I
I
I
I
CHARLES f .LAN GMA ID
PIUSIO[:-.1
•
SKI SHOP
-
.A-s
i~)J11.
~OX 159 VA IL CO LORADO 81658 (30II 476 -1700
•
(,HARtI:"l F.lANCM I\ID
1·1.:1 "1111 ....1
•
SKI SHOP
'/?,cc L c;»;---r-:-?I <"
/'1--{.£.c.k b /£'Q7/3/1 :/~\;,,~c ~c,--c'T -;ijr-{c"('.L ~./17ec:.~~.-?Q /""..'s 0:-_u zx,.,.-r <-;/.-/'5/~,/-)/'1'5 °'20 ,0.,_~/CJ ).,("":
BOX 1')9 1I0NSHf AD M,\ll VAil.COIOR ,IDO 816 ,8 (}031 4 76-1100
j ,
••
_.__._.
,i
i I----_.+.._----..-.'-"-'..-_.....--_._-_...-.._.-......
I c£J."--~I ;""'[--=-_--=~---=-_-~=-=---.--'"::":.-==~
_--;.1:"'_70 .',_'J:~.~..~cJ/.......__..__
i I
-.-':'-~~~.--fi.-/4.~'.~.-.-----...----..-
-~·=~~~-:~~-==.;4 .~;_£;j -·.~-~~-·.~~~-~·~~.~-~·
i····---···~.-~-.~~-'7 -~~~~-.-----.-.-----
..--.---..,~-.A-{'~·a-..·-7;-e-P ~~~r~-------·····-'..-~~~~-~-~/?!?:;--;--_.
~--.---__4 ~:L,t)~_~r -_.~__._~.~~-
.._.._.-..-"-'-------_._-_.-----------------~.'...._._--..--_._.
.--"----.-..._.-...-._-~j-'Jr-V~.---,-.-.--.
,Lf76-_L7.0.p __.
:I,
_...--_..._-
.,
1 r._---'
--------_._._----------------'_.
ASF'HALT
348
·2n
2 ...50
280 ,28 1
349.3!10
21~.Z16
0
0
0
CD
302,303
L1GHTPOLE I.301
W
~
V
j()1 •~
CO
Z
..
..-.........
~.
I ·3Z6tI\3ZZ,3Z3
321,3Z&-
2+00
;....."
....
"~'"
,
~.PRUCE
":;.;•.-~:j
,",,'
~;t;""_.;~~;;'
~'~"."~'.~"':
'~,'•ASPHALT,-'I '.,
~'.;;~~;~'
}."'.~~...."::~:,;i ;:',,,
;K,',:'{'
3!54 .3~3
."
.'"
':IIF=-'~
....
.'",
,270,271 '
~I ~::~:'~~;'~,-
.';'-~
.\1
.•,0 .~
e,'1 .:3
3Oe,.,ulf,
~I ~.,
~~,
Ql
..e../'
"('j
ItJI ~,.',~~
.....~I .:..,
,;
o
iii
C)
z
o
-I-:::>rn
o«w
I
en
Zo
-I
W
0::.-
Z
W
U
1\
Q
~
"-oJ
'-
--
.......e.,
<5 w ~~
75 south fronlage road
vail,colorado 81657
(303)476-7000
MEMO
department ofpublicworks/transportation
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Design Review Board ~L)
Stan Berryman,Director
Department of Public Works/Transportation
October 3,1984
CHARLIE'S GONDOLA SKI SHOP AWNING
This memo is to notify you that the Department of Public
Works/Transportation objects to the current placement
of Charlie's Gondola Ski Shop awning in the Lionshead
Mall.
Our winter snowplowing efforts in the mall will be
severely restricted with the awning extending 23 feet
into the mall.We request that the awning be reduced
to amaximum of 10 feet into the mall.
cc:Pete Burnett
Bill Andrews