HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL POTATO PATCH BLOCK 1 LOT 29 LEGALDEPARTMENT oF coMMUNrt" oiuroPMENrTOWN OF VAIL
75 S, FRONTAGEROAD
vArL, co 81657
970-479-2138
Building----> $3,166.55 Restuarant Plan Review->
Plan Check---> $2,058.26 Recrcotion Fee----->
Ua-^\PYNOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON IOBSTTE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #: 807-0163
Project # PRJ07-0029
Job Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 805 POTATO PATCH DR. Applied . . : 0610512007
Parcel No...: 210106301019 Issued . .. : 09/051200'1
Expires..,: 0l/07/2008
ohrNER LARCH, S.A. 06/0s/2007
c/o CERISoLA
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 8r_657
APPLICANT BECK BUILDTNG COMPAI{Y 05/05/2007 Phone: 970-949-L800
P.O. BOX 4030
VAIL
co 81658
License: 117 -A
CONTRACTOR BECK BUILDING COMPANY 05/O5/2OO7 Phone: 970-949-L800
P.O. BOX 4030
VAIIJ
co 8l_558
I-,icense : 11? -A
Description:
BUILD RETAINING WALIJ
Occupancy: R-3
Type Construction: V-B
Valuation: $488,000.00 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Total Sq Ft Added: . 0
* ra r'rrt it a t a a't a ta rla t*ai r *:r r:r **,it t * *
$0.00 ToTALFEES--.----->
$4.00
Lo[ ac
,.B(k t
$0.00 TotalCalculat€d Fees-> $5.228.81$0.00 Addilional Fees----> $0.00
$5,228.81 Total Permit Fee----> $5,228.81
Payments--------------> $ 14,448.49
BALANCE DUE----> $9,219.68)
lnvestigation.->
Will Call---->
*,1t * t, * | | * a'l t,l * tt 't I t a+ ll ** +t | * a'l l,|l { * a* li tl * '} li * *
Approvals:Item: 051-00 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
06/25/2007 cgunion Acti-on: Ap
09/O4/2OO7 cgunion Action: Ap REVISED PLANS
APPROVED FOR REDUCED SCOPE OF WORK
Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
06/2I/2007 Warren Action: AP
08/28/2007 Warren Action: Ap The revisions to
the building permit rnt eliminate the additior, "t.
O
approved. Only the driveway and retaining wa1I will be
constructed.
Item: 05500 FIRE DEPARTMENT
06/05/2oo7 DRhoades Action: AP See conditions
also. (,J,IR did DRB review)
Circumference of house exceeds 300' from approved fire
department staging.
Fire department staging unavailable in driveway.
Topographical and architectual features prevent 350
degree access.
Scope of work includes existing structure as well as new
addiE.ion.
Fj-re sprinkler system and fire alarm system
required.
Item: 05500 PTBLIC WORKS
06/15/2007 gc Action: DN provide more
information on retain j-ng wa11.
O7/O3/2OO7 cC Action: AP PER GEORGE CHALBERG
See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, Intemational Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY.FOUR HOURS IN OFFICE FROM 8r00 AM
4 PM.
TURE OF O FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER
'}'**!t*'l{.*'|'}{.****{t**,},}!t,t****'|t*{i*:t:**:**+***,}*,}*****|**+**'r*{''i't*,t*,|.'}!*'|.{l**lt'|.*,}'}****
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit #: 807-0163 as of 09-05-2007 Status: ISSUED
*,f *{t*'t't****'i**rl l!tl*,t**+'ltr*********{r't**'tr***t*+t'**:t 't:t:}'tt't'tr****************{.'}*'}**'t*****'t*******r}*********!t**
PermitType: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Applicanr BECK BUILDING COMPAI.IY
970-949-1800
Job Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
Location: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
ParcelNo: 210106301019
Description:
BUILD RETAINING WALL
Applied: 06/05n007
Issued: 09/0512007
To Expire: 0l/0712008
*'|t't'|.**{t******'**************:|t'}*'|.{':|****+**,|.*{.*,t*|**!tConditions*'tt'|t:t,}:t'f'}t**:}*+**:}*!t,}+:t*'t'*{''t****************
Cond: l2
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE,
Cond: CON0009035
Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with
NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and Town of Vail Standards.
Cond: CON0009036
Fire Sprinkler System required and shall comply with NFPA
13 (2002 ed.) and Town of Vail Standards.
* "Oo * r PAGE: l-
Xr328LFPo ENTRY. t REcErvrNG
FPO NUMBER : F30611- DATE RECEIVED: 9/L2/O7
REMARKS : BECK BLDG CO - REFUND OVERPAYMENT
RECETVED BYr LC ElfltEREDz 9/12/o7 13:35 BY: LCAMPBELL,
VENDOR: 0000001 - BECK BUILDTNG CO
INVOICE NUMBER: 807-0163 INVOICE DATE: 9/12/07
INVOICE POSTED: 9/L2/07 13:35 BY: LCAITPBELL
PAYMEMr DUE: 9/2a/07 AMOUNT: $ 573s.2s
ACCOITNT# PROJ# A]'IOIJNT ITEM DESCRIPTION
00100003111100
1l_ 10 0 0 0 31_ r27 00
# 5362.20 VALUATION REDUCTION - REFUND DIFFER
S 373.05 REC FEE REFUND - NO ADDED GRFA
coFy
,r':\ APPI
,-.ffi
^*'S.$?;*;[9^Hl;*Titf#*'"
Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc.!
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657***All Revision submittals must include the Field Set of appro
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
General Contractor:
t ck-
GREG. CHRISATTENTION: JOE,
Contractor Signature:
GOMPLETE REVISIONS EVALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (Labor & Materials
REV|SED AMoUNT: $ 4D0r00D -ELECTRTCAL:S 1000 -OTHER: $
PLUMBING:$ hL &( 'MECHANTCAL,$ 5.t,C00 -REVISED roTAL: $ +l)?, , C00 -
For Parcel # Contact Eagle Coutlty Assessors Ottice at 97
lr:-;--:. ::l ;illrq'wer" a\ D\ ob3o I D lq
Job Name: t-tr lco\a [2-t S i rlt n f C Job Address: BUa ijohfo \;(frt^ Dnye-.
Lesat Description ll r-ot, -}Q ll erocr.' I ll ririns'subdivision: p6tAb Pafrl'^-
owners Nu'"'Rdr,r lu is.iru ll SSa"''Potnlo 0nht^ Dv Va^ \ llflf-oP,"iqnquqq-t"ga
ArchitecUDesisner: p6,y l[ol lqVf S
o#[,"tEo { a1.{D vCr, \ . Lo g\lo4l:EfH3"r,l1, -zzo\
snoineer:Jfip \n6 Atglgttrnr lf;rc o to,r^tu ?wL 6$ t}tla P4q["--'l la--1r,.rr
ffi -Dt,v..c o[ cLrwcwarl , ndfud re fa.nir.iv"aq,?[SJ.t
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Remodel ({) Repair( ) Demo( ) Other( )
Work Type: lnterior ( ) Exterior (! Both ( )Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No X
Type of Bldg.: Single{amily (f,) Two-familV ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: t No. of Accommodation Units in this building:
No/Tvpe of Fireplaces Existinq: Gas Appliances (2 Gas Loqs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burning{)
No/Tvpe of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances (X) Gas Logs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burning (NOT ALLOWED)
Does a Fire Alarm Exist Yes ($ No ( ) ll Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No (X)
r{-
*i***************************************FoR oFFtCE USE ONLr**********************************t******
Date Received:Permit Fee {10}
Accepted By:Permit Fce (11)
http://www.vailgov.convdocs/dl_forms/building_revision_4-18-2007.doc Page 1 of 1 4t18t2007
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL. CO 81657
970-479-2t38
O orro*rMENroF coMM'NIrY otrort"*,
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #: 807-0163
Project # PRJ07-0029
Job Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Status. . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 805 POTATO PATCH DR. Applied . . : 06/05/2007
Parcel No...: 210106301019 Issued . .. : 07/ll/2007
Expires . ..: 0110712008
oI^tNER IJARCH, S.A. 06/05/2007
c/o cERrsor.,A
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 81657
APPr-,f CANT BECK BU]I-,DrNG COMPANY 05 / 05/200'7 Phone: 970-949-].800
P.O. BOX 4030
VAIL
co 81558
Li-cense: 11-7 -A
CONTRACTOR BECK BUILDING COMPANY 06/05/2OO7 Phone: 970-949-7800
P.O. BOX 4030
VAIL
co 816s8
Li-cense: 117 -A
Description:
BUILD RETAINING WAI,I-,,, ELEVATOR IN EXISTING GARAGE, ENI.,,ARGE
THE EXISTTNG GARAGE TO PARK 3 CARS AND ADD GUEST SUITE
Occupancy: R-3
Type Construction: V-B
Valuation: 1,800,000.00 Revision Valuation: $0.00 Total Sq Ft Added: 2487
* ++a tr *+ * +a *t,l rl +**,l t+ ll r ta r* **t 't t
Building----> $8,528.75 Restuarant Plan Review-> $0.00 Total Calculated Fees-> $14,448.49
Plan Check--> $5,543.69 Recreation Fee----> $373.05 Additional pee5-----.-> $0.00
lnyestigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES-----> $14,448.49 Total Permit Fee--_.-> $14,448.49
Will Call---> $3.00 Patments-------.._-> $14,44E.49
BALANCE DUE-._-> $O,OO
t + t l +r t ++ +ll ++ l + + 'l +t * r * i* *:t r * a * t:l *
Approvals:Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
06/25/2007 caunion Action: AP
Item: 05400 PITANNING DEPARTMENT
O5/2L/2OO7 Warren AcCion3 AP
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
06/05/2007 DRhoades Action: AP See condilions
aLso. (,JJR did. one revil
Circumference of house exceeds 300' from approved fi
department staging.
Fire deparEment staging unavailabl-e in driveway.
Topographical and architectuaL features prevent 360
degree access.
Scope of work includes existing structure as wefl as new
addltion.
Fj-re sprinkler system and fire alarm system
rtem: O5iOO PUBI,IC WORKS
06/),5/2007 gc Action: DN Provide more
information on retaininq wal-I.
0"t / 03 / 2oo7 Gc Action: AP PER GEORGE CHALBERG
,i * * *:r r * a t * a* l ++ l l
See the Conditions section of this Document for any that may apply.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR
4 PM.
INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS TN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:OO AM .
TURE OF O OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER
o
re
vv
*.t.t'i.:it++{.*1.****:*:**+*+***++***+***!i***!t**i.*'t**+:}i.:}+:l.:t.+****+,t.*,l.****,t.**{.+**{.'}*'l.*+!*+*+*,|*{.*,t'tl'l.+*+***+****,|
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit #: 807-0163 as of 07-11-2007 Status: ISSUED
,1. !i * * **:* *'l * + * *+ * +**'t,f 'l * * **'t * * * ** ****'l,l' {' * *i.*** **** ***'F**** * * * ** * * * *:} * {' * ***,f * * * *** * * +* * * * *t * * * *'l 't * * ******* *
Permit Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Applicant: BECKBUILDINGCOMPA}IY
970-949-1800
Job Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
Location: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
ParcelNo: 210106301019
Applied: 06/0512007
lssued: 07lll/2007
To Expire: 0110712008
Description:
BUILD RETAINING WALL, ELEVATOR IN EXISTING GARAGE, ENLARGE
THE EXISTING GARAGE TO PARK 3 CARS AND ADD GUEST SUITE
{.,}{. {. *,t '}'1.*'t+:1.{.*+++:t *'t 'i 't * * :t 'i * * * {. * :t ,t * {. ,} * * *
Cond: l2
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLI.ANCE.
Cond: l6
(BLDG.): (SFR) SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION
R3I3 OF THE 2OO3 IRC.
Cond: CON0009035
Monitored fire alarm system required and shall comply with
NFPA 72 (2002 ed.) and Town of Vail Standards.
Cond: CON0009036
Fire Sprinkler System required and shall comply with NFPA
13 (2002 ed.) and Town of Vail Standards.
Cond:18
(BLDG.): STAIRWAYS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET SECTION R3l1.5 OF
THE 2OO3 IRC OR SECTION IOO9 OF THE 2OO3 IBC.
Cond: 19
(BLDG.): GUARDS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET SECTION R3l2 OF THE
2OO3 IRC OR SECTION IOI2 OF THE 2OO3 IBC.
Cond: 34
(BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE
A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR,
Cond: 39
(BLDG): EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS ARE REQUIRED
TO MEET SECTION R3IO OF TIIE 2OO3 IRC OR SECTION IO25 OF THE
2003 IBC.
Cond: CON0009096
SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORTREQUIRED FOR ALL SHORING WALLS
PRIOR TO FOOTING INSPECTION.
rr**t'tt'tr | | * | r* * | | r t+**r*****a**'i't**:i *t**:i:t't******a**rr+rl*,t't't't****'a * * * * * * * * * * * ** * tt* * * * * * * *
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
{' {r*1* **ft t* 'l * * ** * * * * at*a*** +**i*****ttt*t*t:t*rr'tt* a** * ***ft'l'lt 'l i ***tlt I I 'l * * * * * * i I t* *'l * * * * * * *
Statement Number: R070001208 Amount r $8,904,80 O7/LL/200702:33 PM
Payment Method: Check
L3672
Init 3 DDG
Notation: Beck Building Co
Permit No: BO?-0153 Tlfpe: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Parcel No: 2101- 053 - 0101- 9
Sit,e Addreaa: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIIJ
I,OCATiON: 805 POTATO PATCH DR,
ThiE Palmenc:98, e04.80
Total FeeB: $14,448.49
Total J|IJJ [rnt8 : il{ , 448 ,49
Balance:$0.00
***1.*** ***ltl*******'t***r*t*ttrt *t**ilt*t* I I t***ttlllttt* * ** * ***i'l * * 'l | | * t * * * * t * * | * * * * * * * * * I | |
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Deacriptsion Current Pmtg
BP 00100003t 1.1100
RF 11100003112700
wc 001 00003112800
BUIIJDING PERI,IIT FEES
RECREATION FEES
WILL CALI,. INSPECTION FEE
8,525.75
5 /5. U5
3 .00
*{.,1* * t t + l. * * * * * * * * * * * *
'||
{.* * ** 'l,l 'l * * * 't * ** 't l' {' **{r * t' 't 't * 'i rl * * 'l * 'l *
'a 'l * * * * * * '} * * * * * *,1* * * * 'l,l f
'a
* * * * | l' *{.****
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on09-12-2007 rltl3z22t2l 091l2n007
Statement
t'****** * * * * * * * l' 'f 'l * 'l' 'l' 'li
**'l**f * 't t 'f * * 'i {' lr:l' 'f l' {* ** {ri***** * * * t* ** * ** {* * 'l * * * * t * {' 'l 'l * * 'l 'l'
* * * * * * * * * * * * I' I *
Statement Number: R070000886 Amount: $5,543,59 06/05/200?11:29 AM
Payment Method: Check Init: ,f,S
Notacion: 13532,/BECK
BUILDING CO, INC.
Pernit Nor 807-0153 Type: ADD/ALT sFR BUILD pER"ltrT
ParceL No: 2101-053-0101-9
SiIC Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
IJocation: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
Total Fees: $5,228.8L
r'|.r:r'tIt *t **,r****t***'t*+'|*ttt*******'t***'i*'}t*****f**I********************t*
This Palzment: $5,543.69 Total AIJJ Pmts3 $L4 ,44A .49
Balance: 99,219.58)
Current Pmtss
ACCOIjNT ITEM LIST:
Accounts Code Descrip! ion
PF OO],OOOO31123OO PI,AN CHECK FEES 5,543.59
T-)loY'ETTR
June 28, 2007
Town of Vail
FFFfl:TJ ffiffi
Cerisola Residence
Excavation Shoring and Retaining Wall Calculations
Vail. Colorado
Prepared for:
Beck Building Company
PO Box 4030
Vail. Colorado 81685
Prepared by:
M.C. "Mick' Muller. P.E.
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W Highway 72
Arvada, Colorado 80007
Kevin Brooks, EIT
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W Highway 72
Arvada, Colorado 80007
20800 W. Highway 72, Awrda, CO 80007 Phone: 303-27y44X Far 303-279-1D08
This design, including drawings and calculations, are intended solely for use by
Yenter Companies, Inc., its subcontractors, and suppliers for the construction of the
improvements indicated in this design. Yenter Companies, Inc. retains sole
ownership of this design, drawings, and calculations and they shall remain the
property of Yenter Companies, Inc. These drawings and calculations may not be
copied, reproduced, or used without the prior express written permission of Yenter
Companies, Inc.
Copyright 2007, Yenter Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved
20300 W. Highway 72, Awtda, CO 80007 Phone: 303-27y44* Fa* 303-279-(D08
lndex
1. lndex
2. References, Design Parameters, and Assumptions
4. Mathcad Analysis of 13' Micropile Wall (below Potato Patch road)
11. SnailZ Analysis ot 22' Permanent Soil Nail Shoring Cut (for new addition)
16. Mathcad Analysis of 22' Permanent Soil Nail Shoring (concrete facing design)
26. Mathcad Analysis ol22' Permanent Micropile Shoring (optional, not included in
drawings)
33. Building Loads Used in Underpinning Design
35. Analyais Shotcrete Column Used for Underpinning
36. SnailZ Analysis of Underpinning Section
References
FHWA Publication No. FHWAO-|F-03-01 7
Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 7 - Soil NailWalls
FHWA Publication No. FHWA-SA-96-069R
Manualfor Design and Construction Monitoring of Soil NailWalls
FHWA Publication No. FHWA NHI-05-039
Micropile Design and Construction Reference Manual
FHWA Publication No. FHWA-SA-97-070
Micropile Design and Construction Guidelines lmplementation Manual
California Trenching and Shoring Manual
By: California Department of Transportation
Division of Structures
Office of Structure Construction
Soils Report - Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Job No. 106 0938 Dated
December 29. 2006
Software
Mathcad Version 11.1
SnailAA/in Version 5.01
Soil Parameters
Soil 1 (Fill) Soil2 Soil3
i=28 0=32 0=34
y= 115 pcf y= 125pd y= 135 PcfQa=6psi Qa=12psi Qa=12psic=50psf c=100psf c=100psf
Minimum Factor of Safety
Global Stability: 1.5
Bearing Capacity: 2.5
Design Assumptions and Clarifications
The following is an explanation of the shoring design methodology and any
assumptions used for the work to be performed at the Cerisola Residence, Lot 29,
805 Potato Patch Road, Vail, CO. The shoring/retaining walls consist of three
separate areas. These are the upper site wall, the new addition shoring, and the
existing building underpinning. All retaining and shoring walls have been designed
with a minimum global factor of safety of 1.5.
Upoer Site Wall
The upper site wall is located just below Potato Patch Road, on the North side of
the property. This wall has been designed as an "A'frame micropile retaining wall.
The reason for this type of wall is to reduce conflicts with any utilities located in
Potato Patch Road, and to maintain any permanent retaining wall within the
property boundary. The micropile wall will stay within the property boundary, and
should not affect Potato Patch Road. The construction of the retaining wall will
require that one lane of the road be temporarily closed. The micropile wall will be
faced with a segmental retaining wall block to match the existing retaining wall.
New Addition Shorinq
The Shoring for the new addition is designed as a permanent shoring wall and has
been designed as either a soil nailwall, or a micropile wall. Calculations for both
types of walls are included, although currently the plans only show the soil nail
option. The shoring for the new addition will not cross any property boundary.
Existinq Buildino Underpinnino
The underpinning for the existing building will be completed in stages. The first step
will be to install tiebacks through the existing walljust above the footing. Next,
about two feet of soil will be excavated below the footing and a second row of
tiebacks will be installed and covered with a shotcrete facing. The excavation will
be completed to the final depth and another row of tiebacks and shotcrete installed.
.lb
Psl := -tn
^rb^tbpsl:= - Pct := -ftt ftr
Distance from top
to anchor
L1 := Oft
L2:= Oft
L3 := Ofr
L4:= Oft
L5:= Oft
Back row
USDI := l0
D1 := Oin
t1 := Oin
b1 := 5.25in
51 := 36in
lbkip:= l000.lb ksi:= 1000.:
in2
Tension (divide bv
horizontal spacinq)
T:= Olb
Length of wall L,r:= 65ft
1. WallGeometry
Height of wall
Angle of backslope
Soil friction angle
Soil unil weight
Horizontal load
2. Micropiles
Distance between MP rows
Batter angle of rear MP row
Elastic modulus of steel
Compressive strength of grout
Yield strength for steel bar
Yield strength for steel pipe
Rebar size
Outside pipe diameter
Wall thickness of pipe
Borehole diameter
Spacing
3. Load and Resistance FactorB
v\:= I
YE. := I
Yt := I
Yr6:= I
t6,:= 0.35
@Ep:= I
OFr:= 0.66
<D6:= |
Load faclor applied to surcharge
Earth pressure reduction due to back row of micropiles ( S 1)
Moment Reduction (both rorvs)
Reduced Moment in Back Row Due to Soil Supporl (additional)
Steel Shear Strength Reduction Factor
Resistance Factor for passive earth pressure resistance
Resistance Factor applied to Flexural Capacity of vertical elemenls
Resistance Factor applied to Ground Nail Facing Capacity (Punching Shear)
H= 13ft
p:= l8.deg
{:= 32.deg
y:= l2Opcf
_ kipq:= )--ft
Front row
dl := l2.in
ro := l0.deg
E.:= 29000.ksi
ft:= 3000'psi
F6r:= 75ksi
Fpy:= 35ksi
USD:= 10
Dg := Oin
tg := Oin
bs:= 5.25in
56 := l Sin
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada. CO 80007
Page 1 of7 ##
-
4. Earth Pressure Flr:= if(ts = 0,F6r,For)
F2r:= if(t1 = 0,F6r,For)
Ka = 0.358
*dp) *
\=2'sz+
Active Load
pa := (o.6s.Ka.y.H).yEr
Pa = 363 psf yEr.25.H = 325 ft
Pau'= 1(KeE a = 1.4ft
nu1:= eu.f
R"" ,= P'. u'ft
'2
R6:= q.yla.ft
Passive Load
YRal := 2:
Ypn2:= H + Z3
vn:t= GP
Ral = 2362Ib
RaZ = 254Ib
Ra: = 5000Ib
Ynat = 8.67ft
Ynaz = t:.s3ft
Ynu: = 10ft
Active ep
Active ep below mudline
Surcharge
eo:= y.(ro - ru).1a - a;
Pp = 1456psf
Ynp = 18.t3ftP,^;= P^'
(d - a)'ft
rY2
5. Depth of Embedment
Depth of embedment (guess)
Sum Moments:
YpO:=H+a+(d-a;.3 Rp = 4078IU
(Change d until sum of moments is approximately zero)
increase d if moment is positive
decrease d if moment is negative
(Rur.ynur) + (nu2.vpu2) + (nd.vqd) - ("o t*J - r.(r,1 + L2 + L3+ La + L5) = 0 ft.kip
1.0.d = 7ft
1.2.d = 8.4ft
1.4'd = 9.8ft
1.0'd+H=20ft
1.2.d+H=21.4ft
1.4.d, + H= 22.8fr.
Set user defined embedment depth ld,r=-tzq
Ht=25ft
.or(p)2 - "o.(o)2
"o(o)2 - "o.(o)2
Ht:= H + du
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada, CO 80007
Page2 ol7
6. tletermine the equivalent steel Area and toment of Inertia of the composite section
for each tlP section in the MP shoring wall:
Es:= sTooo.t@i:;; Ec = 3.122 x lo6psi
Eso"'= E
no,= ir(no=0, utlitt",?) *r= 0.625in
*,,=,r[o, =',-f,i) R, =0.625in
n::= if(Ro = o,b6,Ro - t6) R3 = o.625in
R4:= if(Rl =o,bl,Rl -t1) R4=0.625in
n2,= P.1.in
8.2
nc = 9.2E9
R2 = 0.625 in
Elastic (Young's) Modulus for Grout
Modular Ratio
Outside Pipe Radius
Outside Grout Radius
,u*,,= ; [,*oro
- <n:ro] . # . *1
,**'= ; [[1*rya
- lnaya].
(*)l*/' . *,1
A1e,11:=,, [,*r'-(ru)2]. #. *1
Aback := " [,*,,' - (R4)2] . *q . *,1
Outside Rebar Radius USDI
R2l :=
-.1'in
rnont=0.r2in4 rront l[:t*#1;B;l1i'"""
Iback = 0'l2in4 back
Afiont = l.227in' front
Aback = l.227in' back
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Higtway 72
Arvada, CO 80007
Page 3 of 7
tlr + linN:- N = 301lin
i:= l..N L.:= i.in H= 13ft E=25ft
l
Aback."r.
xx.:= L.'tan(6) + dt .,,= ;-*I Aback Afront
tan(o/ = 0.176 s1 so
,,2 , .)I6n1 + Alon1.(c.|- I6*p + Agu"p.{xx. - c,)-
n.n . \'/ \ r r,/
'so51
I.:= IMP.ll
oFs.Flv.l. oFc.F2v.l.
Mln.:= ' ' Nl2n.:= ' ' 't Do I DlTrbc,+- xx.-c.+-12rl2
max(Mln) = 220 kip max(M2n) = 110 kip
Right side loading diagram
po '=
q *f-r H+ d l(('os'r"'r'i'i",1)
ir i'in-i = "
I o ott "r*tr"
Left side loading diagram
l-er-',=
l[r'(rn-nu)'1i'in-(H+a)]]
if i.in>H+ 3 Passiveearth pressure
lo otrrenvise
Anchor Loads
ru1 := fr if i.in=Ll no:= lr if i.in = L2 ,a3i:= lr ir i.in =r-3 nua := lr if i.in=L4 nas := lr if i.in =L5
l0 otherwise l0 otherwise l0 otherwise l0 otherwise l0 otherwise
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada, CO 80007
Page 4 of 7
V:=oo'*
for i e l..N
n <- [o.s'(rn, * \_,) - (t, * ..,_,)].(t,- L"r)_]* Di-,
Di - Di -.o.i
Di - Di -."*
Di - Dr- to.i
D. <- D. - ro.*
D. <- D. -.o.*
ifL.=H-Lt
ifL.=H-Lz
ifL.=H-L3
ifL.=H-L4
ifL.=H-L5
M:= rr
| .: ,Ji "
loo'
'[o's (v' + ut')'(t - t-",)] + o' ,
R:=
D
n <- o.!ft aRt=
for ie 0..N
ifL.>r4
ln <- v.I'
lu.""t
R
oo - o.{
for ie l..N
lo,- o ir L. <rrr
;n. <- o.s.(en * pn,_,) - (O, * rt,_,)] (.,
D
- r.._,) rr l. > ut
* = -r.utrIEft
an:= )an an = -o.+re!lP
ft
P:= -Pl
Mmx := max(M) Mmx = ZS.O66 kip.*
n
Mmn:= min(M) Mmn = l, tO 3tip
Maximum (factored) Moment
Minimum (factored) Moment
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Higtvay 72
Arvada, CO 80007
Page 5 of 7
Ml n = fronl ror allorable moment = red line
M2n = back row allowable moment = blue line
M = applied moment = green line
H= 13ft
E=2sft
c1 := min(Mln - M)
c2 := min(M2n - M)
Checkyln := if(ct < -2lb, "Check Front Row' , "OK" )
Checkppn := if(c2 < -2lb, "Check Back Row' , "OK" )
max(M, Mln, M2n) = 229 Yi,
max(M) = 75.666krp
= "OK"
= "OK"
8.33
Applied & Allowable Moment Diagram
!
ft
6Lqg-
;ftE-----
Ar-
ft
16.67
25 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 lEo 200
Mln M2n M
kip kip kip
Moment (kip*ff/ft)
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada, CO 80007
Page 6 of 7
Acvive earth pressure resultant
Number of piles per ft
Active force per pile
Shear strength of one pile
,^,=+*,
N.'= I * I
'so51
."0,= ft
s'= uo,.yry[(#)'
P" = 8.63as-ft
N"= l1
Pap = 8'634kip
1.rrin2l so = 32.2l4kipI FSs :=
sp
Pap
FS. = 3.731
Micropiles per foot
Number of micropiles
Drilling
Lengih of cap
.pr,= a * a'51 56
Nmp:= mpf .Lw
bhf := Nmp'I!
Impf=l-'ft
Nmp = 65
bhf = 1625 ft
Lw= 65ft
Yenler Companies, lnc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada, CO 80007
PageT ol7
lloo
Date: 04-19-266?Snaillfin $.firc: Gcri*ola llcr fiililit
Minimum Factor of Safety = 1.55
42.8 ft Behind llall Grest
2.9 ft Delour llall Toe
H= 22-g It
LEGEND:
PP= 2-? k/tt
PS= 22.9 l(ips
FI= {5.e Xsi
$h= 4.6 ft
Su= 5.6 ft
GR]I PHI COH SIGpcf deg psf psi115.6 28 56 6.8L25-g 32 Lgg L2-6135.6 34 Lgg t2.8
Scale = 16 ft
t2
Page -File: Ceriso.La New Addition
***************************************************
* CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION *
* ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER *
* DIVISION OF MATERIALS AND FOUNDATIONS* Office of Roadway Geotechnical Engineering *
* Date : 04-1,9-2007 Time: 08':22:36 ****************************************************
First Slope from lva1lcrest.
Second Slope from 1st slope. =Third Slope from 2nd slope.
Fourth Slope from 3rd slope. :
F i fr-h ql.rna f r"^rn ?rzl c l anaJ+vPv.Sixlh Slope from 3rd slope.
Seventh Slope Anqle
First Slope Angle below Toe.
Eirst Slope Distance from Toe.
Second Slope Angle
Second Slope Distance from Toe.
Vertical Depth of Search.
Number of Searches below wa11 Toe. =
Project Identification -
Vertical Wall Height
WafI Batter
Unit Friction
Soil Weight Angfe
Layer (Pcf) (Deqree )
1 115.0 28.0
2 1.25.0 32.0
3 135.0 34 .0
Cerisola New Addition
WALL GEOMETRY ---------
22.0 fE
? fl r|aaroa
Angle Length(Deg) (Feet )0.0 25.085.0 13.018.0 20.00.0 100.00.0 0.00.0 0.0
0.0
SLOPE BELOW THE WALL
---- suRcfiARGE ---------
THE SURCHARGES IMPOSED ON THE SYSTEM ARE:
Begin Surcharge - Distance from toe =
End Surcharge - Distance from toe
Loading Intensity - Begin
Loadinq Intensitv - End
0.0 degrees
0,0 ft
0,0 degrees
0.0 ft
5.0 ft
5
2.0 ft
25.0 ft
240.0 psf/ft
240.0 psf / ft
Cohesion Bond* Coordinates of Boundary
Intercept Stress xS1 YSl XS2 YS2(Psf) (Psi) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
----- oPTroN #1 ---------
Factored Punching shear, Bond & Yiel-d Stress are used.
SOIL PARAMETERS ---------
50.0
100.0
t-00.0
0.0
20.0
L2 .5
6.
1a
0 0.00 0.00 0.0
ih a\hri^nfrr vP rfvrr
0.0 0. 014.5 t_00.0
7 .O t-00.0
* Bond Stress also depends on BSF Factor #5 when enabled.
l3
Page - :File: cerisola New ii:l:l::_ wArER suRFAcE _________
NO Water Tab1e defined for this problem.
SEARCH LIMIT ---------
The Search Limit is from 1.1 to 44.0 ft
You have chosen NOT TO TIMIT the search of failure planes
to specific nodes.
REINFORCEMENT PAR,METERS ---------
Number of Reinforcement Levels = 5
Horizontal Spacing = 4.0 ft
Di.ameter of Reinforcement Element = 1.250 inYield Stress of Reinforcement = 45.0 ksi
Diameter of Grouted Hole = 5,3 in
Punching Shear = 22,0 kips
(For ALL LeveLs )
Reinforcement Lengths = 20.0 ft
Reinforcement Inclination = 15.0 degreesVertical- Spacing to First LeveL = 1.0 ftVertical Spacing to Remaining Levels = 5.0 ft
14
FiIe: Cerisola New
DEPTH MINIMUM
BELOW SAFETY
WALL TOE FACTOR(ft)
Reinf. Stress at
DEPTH MINIMUMBELOW SAFETY
WALL TOE FACTOR(ft)
1.00 1.63
Reinf. Stress at
Addition
DISTANCE
BEHIND
WALL TOE(ft)
44.0
Level 1 =
3=
A_
R-
DISTANCE
BEHIND
WALL TOE(ft)
44.0
Level
TOWER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE ],ENGTH
/.l6d\ / ft- \
24 .6 29 .O
0.000 Ksi
0.000 Ksi
7.575 Ksi (Pul-i.out
1,1 .852 Ksi (Pullout
28 .L29 Ksi (Pullout
LOWER FAILURE
PLANE
ANG],8 LENGTH
(deg ) (ft)
UPPER FAILURE
PI"ANE
ANGLE LENGTH
/.|ad\ / ft- \
58.1 33.3
UPPER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH(deq1 (ft )
54.7 30.4
0.000 Ksi
0.000 Ksi
9.113 Ksi (PuIIout controls... )22.565 Ksi (Pullout controls. . . )
20.618 ksi (Punching Shear controls, . )
DEPTH MINIMUM
BELOW SAFETY
WA],L TOE FACTOR(ft)
2.00 1.56
Reinf. Stress at Level
2:
2=3:
R-
DISTANCE
BEHIND
WALL TOE(ft)
44.0
LOWER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH(des1 (ft)
32.r 3L.2
0.000 Ksi
1.824 Ksi (PuIIout controls. . .
L2.65L Ksi (Pullout control-s. . .
23.477 Ksi (Pullout control-s. . .
22.33L ksi (Punching Shear controls..)
LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE
PLANE PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH(des1 (ft) (deq1 (ft)
5Z-t 5r.4 J5.J JU.v
0. 000 Ksi
0.265 Ksi (Pull-out controls. . .
I0 .9O2 Ksi (Pullout controls...
2l .539 Ksj- (Pull-out controls...
24.458 ksi (Punching Shear control-s.. )
LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE
PLANE PLANE
ANGLE TENGTH ANGLE LENGTH(des) (ft) (deg) (ft)
33.3 31.6 55. 9 31.4
0.000 Ksi
0.000 Ksi
9.211 Ksi (Pullout control-s... )
19.666 Ksi (PuIIout controls. . . )
26.515 ksi (Punching Shear controls. . )
LOWER FA]LURE UPPER FAILURE
PLANE PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH(des) (ft) (deg1 (ft)
DEPTH MINIMUM
BELOW SAFETY
WAI,L TOE FACTOR(ft)
3.00 1.54
Reinf. Stress at
DEPTH MINIMUM
BELOW SAFETY
WALL TOE FACTOR(fr)
4.00 1.54
Reinf. Stress at
DEPTH MINIMUM
BE],OW SAFETY
WALL TOE EACTOR
tfi-\
DI S TANCE
BEHIND
WALL TOE(ft)
44.0
Level 1 =2=
3=
A-
DI S TANCE
BEHIND
WALL TOE
/f+\
44 .0
Level 1 =
2=
3:
n-
DI S TANCE
BEHTND
WALL TOE
/fr-\
.1b.f, sL.Y
controls..
controls. .
controls. .
UPPER TAILURE
PLANE
ANGIE LENGTH
/Aaa\ / fl- \\vvY/
l5
5. 00 r. 53
Reinf. Stress at Level- I =2:
3=
32 .0 f/.r
(Pullout controls.(PuIlout controls.(Pullout controfs.
34.5
0.000 Ksi
0.000 Ksi
5.990 Ksi
16.096 Ksi
26.202 Ksj.
****************************r.***************************************
* For Factor of Safety = 1.6* Maxi-mum Averaqe Reinforcenent Workinq Force:* 6.984 Kips/level *
********t********************t**********r.*******************i*******
Designed by: l(WB
Ghecked by: MGM
Soil Nail Wall Design
^ tbf
Dst i=
-
DCt :=.,
tt
psf
ft
kip:= 1000.1bf ksf:= l000.psf ksi:= 1000'psi
Dimensions and
Perm := I
Soil/rock properties:
S:= 32deg
c:= lOOpsf
y:= 125pcf
material properties:
0 for temp, t for perm
soil angle of intemal ffiction
soil cohesion (used for bearing capacity only)
soil unit weight
A^.= "t n(0.:s.tun(O)) A = ll.Tdeg shotcrete/soilinterfacefriction
Wall geometry (see figure 1):
Ho:= 22ft
h":= 2.ft
i6:= 0.deg
0 := 0deg
ily:= 0ft2
Reinforced shotqete
th. := 5.5in
WO:= 8in
select wwf
height ofground nail wall
height ofupper cantilever section
angle ofthe face batter with the vertical
angle ofbackslope with the horizontal
Area of wall face
thickness of shotcrete (minimum)
width of plate
Figuo L Gound N.ilWeI S.h.mdic
ST:=
0.087
0.t74
0.120
0.240
0.058
0.116
0.080
0.160
0.145
o.167
0.178
0.200
)
ln
ft
A-.r. := ST ^lt.
lnA-"r. = 0.12-
ft
Layer of 4x4 W2.9xW2.9
of 4x4 W2.9x1A/2.9
wo Lavers of 4x4 W4.0xW4.0
5) One Layer of 6xG W2.9x\ r2.9
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. H$,y 72
Arvada, CO 80007
fi3-279458 Page 1 of 10
Ground Nall Wall Calcs
Hr\2007 Prolects\Cerisola Residence\Designed by: KWB
Checked by: I$CM
-zln
Amsn = 0.120 * area of steel (per foot) from wwf (equal in both directions)
n
f.:= 4000psi compressive strength of shotcrete
. f*r:= 60.ksi tensile yield strength ofthe wire & facing rebar
\6 := 0.5.in diameter of the vertical reinforcement bar
uvD ,- &number of vertical reinforcement bars (assumed discontinuous)
Qr6 := 0.5.in diameter of the horizontal reinforcement bar
number of horizontal reinforcement bars (assumed continuous)n16 := 2
Ground nail properties
S1 := 4.ft
Srr:= 5ft
horizontal spacing between nails
vertical spacing between nails
Qr:= l2.psi ultimate pullout resistance (ground-grout bond)
D6:= l.25.in diameter ofrebar used in ground nail
D, := 5.25.in diameter of grout hole
L:= 20.ft length of nail
f, := 75.ksi Yield strength ofnail
in:= l5.deg nail inclination(horizontal)
FiourB 2. Soil Nail & Roidorc€d ShoEI€b sch.malic
8
D1 := lt6.-
ln
8D:= hu':ln
8D3:= 1t66. '
ln
Hydrostatic loads:
hw := O.ft height ofwater on shotcrete face (from bottom ofwall)
y*:= 62.4.pcf unit weight of water
Surcharge load:
a := 72.psf uniform surcharge pressure simulating live traffic load (applied horizontally)
f := 1.0 impact factor
o16:= o'f osh = 72Psf
Number of soit naits N '= "eilr
It h")
^ = oIsu )
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
303-2794458 Page 2 of 10
Designed by: KWB
Checked by: MCM
Controlling group loads and reduction hctons (Service Load
Design method):
Reduction factors applied to ultimate strengths for facing, tensile yield ofbar and
ground-grout bond. From Group I loading, Tables 4.4 & 4.5 pages 97 &99,
Reference 1.
facing flexure cr1:= 0.85 nail tensile strength o1 := 0.55 ground-grout pullout ct:= 0.5
Facing load:
0 := 90deg + ib
IQ:=.in(e * O)2
.rn(
Fp := 0.5
[. .."---t-------- -2-l
e)2,in(e - a)
ll
r . J[:*f#"**#)] l
,",= ['
(*- n*F * y.[H. - r,*).h*] * ('
;'*).n ^,'l r. ? * + Ho.osh
2'Pa
')rL-
P^= l0.lE-ft
earth pressure facing load per ground nail
ths.56
Ka = 0'283
r, = 1s.1Ii!-ft
o .- r"'#
hpn- 2
2.Fp'Pa'56.Sy
,F,= ---E-
tE = 9.2kip
1e = 41.9 Pcf
Flexure capacity of reinforced shotcrete (per Reference 1):
Perm = I
Aolorot steel '= ,nJ-\
n"6'0.25.n.\6' + 56'A.16 + S'Amsh't'Drrt2
ths.sv
n66.0.25
Aolotot steel = 0.0033
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
303-279-4454 Page 3of10
H:\2007 Projects\Cerisola Residence\Designed by: KWB
Checked by: MCM
cp:=
cg:=
if Perm =0 rAo74e1 51esl < 0.0035
C <- I otherwise
c
Perm=0 n Ao76o1 .1""1 < 0.0035
C +- I otherwise
e I otherwise
Avs.ft,v f ths Aur.t,v )mnv .=
-
- S5 l2 t.2.ft.s6/
C <- 2.0 if th. < 4.in
C <- 2.0- 9.(,n, - +.in) ir th. > 4.in n th, < 6.in
2.in t -
C <- I otherwise
if
C
c
C <- 2.5 if th. < 4.in
c +- 2.5- *.(tn, - +.in) ir th, > 4.in ^ ths < 6.in
c <- 2.0- *.(tnr - o.in) ir th, > 6.in n th, < 8'in
Cp = t Empirical factors applied to the sholcrete flexure and shear slrength. Values are greater lhan 1 for
temporary shotcrete less than I inches thick with a steel area less than 0.35 percent of the gross
CS = t shotcrete section (allows greater flexure & shear capacity for flexible, temporary shotcrete).
vertical flexure:
t
f o'nl- 2
An6 := nu6.r.l i I Avb = 0.4in' vertical bar area
\.)
An, := 56.A1151 + An6 Avs = 0.E73 in2 totial vertical steel area
,nnu = 2.g2 ! iig negalive momenl
,no., ._ (A',,, - Anu)'f*y.f ttr, _ (Rn. - nuu'enu)'f-l
,no" = 1.64
ft'kip posirive moment56 12 1.7.f".S6 J - ft (Oiscontinuous rebar)
. /s.sh\
SVT.:=
Aur. loo
SV%=0.331Typp:= Cr.(-u * rnp").| ;- | Tytrp:= Tvnn.af
r. S" ,/ ^ Sh'th.
Tvrr = 28.6kip vertical flexure capaclty
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hvry 72
Arvada, CO 80007
30927C.4458 Page 4of10
Designed by: KWB
Checked by: MGM
horizontal flexure:
/ onu'l-
A66 := n55.n'l
- |
\L,/
A5r := Su.Arr6 + ,{1'6
Arrt = o.4in2
Afis = 0.993 in2
horizontal bar area
total horizontal steel area
An..f*u (th, An..f*" \
rrrv .-
-'l
' s" \2 1.7.t.\/mn = 2.5e! 4P
Tp41l:= THFF.of
negaiive moment equals the
positive moment (continuous
rebar)
. . /s.s"\rspp:= Cp'(mu + *) luj
Tnrr = 5l.7 kiP sH%,=
Attt'loo
SH% = o.3ol
horizontal flexure capacity sv'ths
Punching shear capacity of reinforced shotcrete (Reference 1):
tt"
Dc:= WO+;Dc = 0.896ft
VN = 23.5 kip
A.=207.4i]
AE= 21'6ir2
T4p:= Tpp.crl
rh.
Vry := 4.rl f".l.psi.zt.D..-
1t o. + tfrr)24.,=l , J.n
/ o"\2
A":=l--=1.71' \2/
_Vprre:= --1.1(ffiff
'-l-s"'q-{
Tpp = 25.1kiP punching shear capacity
Ground nail yield capacity (Reference 1):
*",= &(?)'
Tw = 92'0kiP
.n T4y:= Tgy'o1
tensile yield capacity
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
303-27W458 Page 5 of '10
Designed by: l(WB
Checked by: llCtll
Grout-soil bond capacity of the ground nails (Reference 1):
Ty6:= Qrr.D*.n Tn6:= T1-16.o'9
k'ruc = z.:zs 5P grout-soil bond capacity per length of ground nail
Summary of ultimate and allowable capacities:
tp = 9.2kip earthpressure loading on facing
UltimateCapacity ReductionFactorsAllowableCapacity
Flexure (vertical) Tvrp = 28.6 kip af = 0.85 Tvar = 24.3 kip
Flexure (horizontal) THr.r = 5t.7kip af = 0.85 T}I,{Ir = 43.9kip
Punching Shear Tr.p = 25.1kip af = 0.85 Tep = 2l.4kip
Tensile Yield Tuy = 92.0kip ot = 0.55 Tay = 50.6kip
Grout-Soil Bond lbf cr^ = 0.50 Ta lbfruc=237s? qg=o'50 Tac= ll88
o
rrl
Graph of the Allowable Stength Distribution along Soil lllafls fo
facilitate I nput for Global Stability Analysis (sepante calc ulation) :
50
Yield 40
S Face
8':". 30o tacel-oao
tt
20
0"0 5 l0 ts 20
TY,TY,TY,Y
feet
Gr3ph of the A ouabto stt€ngth Dbtrlbu on to f.clllt te Global stablliv Analysls. Eerth Pros.u6 Faclng Load,
Atlouablo l|all Yleld and f Inlmum Allowablo Flclng R€lbtanco a]l plotled lor Infolmatlon only.
_. r. t. i. t. t.
l0
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
N+279458 Page 6of10
Designed by: KWB
Checked by: MCM
tt=
2r.359
22.555
22.555
0
tabulated resistance distribution ftips) per nail (mtst
divide by horizontal spacing before inputing into
glob al s tab ility pr ogram
' [;t]"
min(tt,,tt'tt )t'tinT:= +---.-----..--- -S6
nail lengilh
Upper cantilever section:
shear: ( n", ')
".'= [; tJ'r" + h.'o56 lbfv"=215-'ft
vns = 417q}!!
'n = rsot.t]!!
, "Problem!" )
ft
mc = 143.1lbf .3
ft
mn := Of fiulv
51
Ahs - Ahb
Ash :=
-
s"
Minimum Area of Steel Required per foot of wall
Actual Area of Steel from WWF vertical
Check3 := if(A.es > Asv,"Problem!","OK")
Chec\ ='66"
Actual Area of Steel from \A/WF horizontal
Check4:= if(ngs > Ash,"Problem!" ,"OK")
Checka = "69'
Minimum cover requirements (ACl 318 Sec,tion 7.7 Concrete Ptolection for Reinforcement):
th"
-
Vnr:= 2'i',/ft.l.nsi
V := crf Vns
Checkl := if(V > v., "OK"
Flexure: hc.vc
mc:= -----------r---T
3.co{i6)
in '2
Aqs:= F6.Rt.ths.l2.- nes = 0.1l9*ft
Avs - Avb )
ln
Asv = 0.12 -ft
ln
Ash = 0.12 -ft
Asv :=
Check2 := if(mn > mc, "OK" , "Problem!" )
Reinforced shotcrete reinforcement:
Check2 = "Q6"
Minimum reinforcement ratio (ACl 318 Section 7.12 Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement):
For Temperature
Rt := 0.0018 minimum ratio of steel reinforcement area to gross concerete area (for Grade 60 steel)
Fo := 1.0 Factor to Increase Gross Concrete Area due to Uneveness in Cut Line
T = 5.34kip
Shear load on section
One way unil shear strength of
reinforced shotcrete seclion
Allowable one way shear strength
Checkl =!rOK'
mn = 2401.2lbf.I
ft
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
30t2794458 Page 7of10
Designed by: l(tlB
Checked by: MCM
The reinforcement steel in the shotcrete urill have a minimum shotqele cover of 3 in. whicfi
meels or exceeds the ACI requirements.
Splice requirements for welded wire mesh (ACl 318 Section '12.15 Splices of Deformed Bars and
Deformed Wire in Tension):
rwv
L66:= 0.27.A635'-: Ldb=3ln L6:= 1.5'L66 Ld=4in
..trp'i
Splice := rna*(Oin, L6) Splice = 6 in
External stability (eccentricity, overturn i n g and bearing capacity) :
Bearing capacity factors: (from page 50 of Reference 2)
no
'=
t'n(+s.ar, * {)t..n't*tol Nq = 2g.Z (after Reissner, 1924)
Nc = 35.5 (after Prantl, 1921)
Nr = 30.2 (after Vesic, 1973)
n.:= (No - r).*(O)
ttr:= 2.(uo + r).t*(O)
l{oto: Bocause all the ground nall watts a|t longer than 5 tlmer the wldth (23 moi.El, the ollglml, ultlmat harlng
cep.clty oquatlon dEdvod fol tho pl.no rtraln condldon (cor lnuo6 footlngl ls approprlab. Adlustrnent factors tor iootlng
3hapo, load Incllnatlon and 3lope all not roqulrd.
'- x'l -*Xm-
-x2_
Figurs 5. Eslablishing th6 base width (looling) end
verticsl bgckwEll (horizontal earh pa6$ure) ot thg
rolntorced "grav f'wall for sxtomal stabillty c€la]Jlations.
-Xm
Figur€ 6. Calculate tl|e v'/eighl and moment ams (ftom t@
of wall) for the se\€n blocks comprising the ]einforced
"gravity' wall ard th6 horizontal earth pressute ior
thg €(6rnal stability calorlations.
Xl := (L - l50.mm).cos(in)Xl = 18.84ft
X2 = 18.84ft See Figures 5 &6above'X2:= Xl * (H. - tr").sin(i6)
Xl+X2Xrn:= :::----: Xm = 18.84ft
2
E *
'=
rL * (x- - n".tan(i6)).tan(f) Hm = 22.00ft
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
303-279-4458 Page 8 of 10
D$igned by: KWB
Checked by: MGll
,n,=l ''t*.n*)2 +l.[(Hm-hw).hw] * (t -t*).n*'l*".? n*2+Hm.o,5 rn=,0.r$2 ' ' 2 l'2 "" ft
Hmy=i y=7.3ft
Mresist:= Wl'mal + W2'ma2 + W3.ma3
Mresist = a88.2kio.I Resisting moment'ft
Movert:= Ph.y Movert = Za.+np.3 Overtuming moment
WT:= Wl + W2 + W3
wr=5l.s2En Total weight of "gravi$" wall
Mresist - MovertX0:=X0=8ft
Br = 16ft Reduced footing width
qmax = 3.2 ksf Bearing pressure from gravity wall
e = 0.25Eksf Embedment lerm
ec = 1.4ft Eccentricity check for overfuming
(e should be less than or equal to X6)
X6 = 3'l ft ch".k5 := ir(x6 < e", "Eccentric" ,"oK" )
FS6. = l.69 Factor of safety for bearing capacity
(should be greater than 2.5)
Check6 := if(Fsbc < 2.5, "Problem!" , "OK" )
FSol = 6.56 Factor of safety for overtuming
(should be grcater than 2.0)
CheckT := if(Fsot < z, "Probleml" , "OK" )
B1 := 2.X0
WTqmax:= t
".r=I--xg-2
XmX6:=
-6
qult
rsbc :=
-
qmax
Mresist
1561 i=
-
- - Movert
A.
Nh:=
-
Nh=0- Su'Sn
q:= o.s.n..sin(in).y
qult := c.Ns + 0.5.(f - Tw).BrN, + q.tlo qult = 24.6 ksf Ultimate bearing capacity
bhf := NU.L bhf = 0 ft shotcrete := 4.tt\ shotcrete = 0 yd3 O, ,= *n[9)
W1 := S6.n65.Nb Wn = 0 ft \ 6ft /
Wu := 36in.nn6.N6 Wv = 0 ft
5:= ceil(N5)
Yenler Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
303-2794458 Page 9 of 10
Deeigned by: KWB
Checked by: MCltl
Height of wall
Batter of wall
Backslope angle
Soil properties
Vertical spacing
Horizontal spacing
Angle of nail
Height of cantilever sec'tion
Diameier of bar
Grade of bar
Diameter of hole
Length of hole
Width of Plate
Thickness of Shotcrele
VerticalWhaler
Horizontal Whalers
Surcharge load (horizontal)
lmpact factor
Nail resistance (for SlopeW)
Number of nails
Summary
Ho=22ft
ib=odeg
F = odeg
$ --32deg
c = l00psf
T = l25pcf
Qr = l2Psi
\=sft
St=+ft
in = 15 deg
hc=2ft
Dt=to
! = 75tsi
Dg = 5'25 in
L=20ft
wP=8in
fts = 5.5in
h,=a nvb=2
B=4 nhb=2
osh = 72 Psf
f=l
T = 5.3 kip
N=4
Upper cantilever sec{ion Checkl = "Q6"
Check2 = rrQll'l
Reinforced shotcrete Check3 = "Of"
Checkl = "OK"
Extemal stability Check5 = "gK'
Check ='OK'
Check? ='OK'
Faceload E=9.22kip
Face capacity Tnu = 2l.359kip
Takeoffs
a
Face area A- = 0 ft-
Number of bolts *O = O
Total drilling bhf = 0 ft
Ultinate Capacity
Flexure (vertical) Twr = 28.6kip
Flexure (horizontal) Tnnn = 5l.7kip
Punching Shear Tpp = 25.1 kip
Tensile Yield rw = e2.okip
Grout-Soil Bond 1,,,- = 2375 !!l
af = 0.85
ctt= 0.85
at= 0.85
at = 0.55
ag = o'50
shotcr€te = 0 yd3
Mesh = "One Layer of 4x4 W4.0xW4.0"
Whaler size Dvb = 0.5 in
Dt = 0'5in
Whaler Lengtn Wn = Oft
Wv=Oft
Wh+ W=oft
Bags of grout Cr, = 0
Reduction Factors Allowable Capacity
Tver = 24.3 kiP
TP4P = 43.9kiP
Tnp = 2l.4kip
Tev = 50.6kip
rAG = nEs{l
Yenter Companies, Inc.
203O0 W. Hwy 72
Arvada, CO 80007
30$279-4458 Page 10of10
.lb
Dsl :=
-' .2ln
- lb ^ lb " = looo.tb ksi := looo.!Pst := - pcl := - Klp:=
ftz ft3 in2l. Wall Geometry
Height of wall
Angle of backslope
Soil friction angle
Soil unit weight
Horizontal load
2. Micropiles
Distance between MP rows
Batter angle of rear MP row
Elastic modulus of steel
Compressive strength of grout
Yield strength for steel bar
Yield strength for steel pipe
Rebar size
Outside pipe diameter
Wall thickness of pipe
Borehole diameter
Spacing
3. Load and Resistance Factors
YIa:= I
1lE":= I
Yr := I
Yt5 := I
Yl,:= 0.35
<DEO:= I
OFr:= 0.66
(D6:= I
H=22ft
p := 0.deg
g := 32.deg
y:= l2Opcf
- kipq:= )--ft
Front row
dl := l2.in
<o := 15.deg
Er:= 29000.ksi
f":= 3000.psi
F6r:= 75ksi
Fpr:= 35ksi
USD:= l0
Dg := Oin
tg := Oin
b6:= 5.25in
S9 := l8in
Distance from too
to anchor
L1:.= 12ft.
L2:= Oft.
L3:= Oft
L4:= Oft
L5:= Oft
Back row
USDI:= l0
D1 := Oin
t1 := Oin
b1 := 5.25in
51 := 36in
Tension (divide bv
horizonlal spacinq)
T:= 50001b
Length of wall L* := Oft
Load factor applied to surcharge
Earth pressure reduction due to back row of micropiles ( < 1)
Moment Reduction (both rows)
Reduced Moment in Back Ror Due to Soil Support (additional)
Steel Shear Strength Reduction Factor
Resistance Factor for passive earth pressure resistance
Resistance Factor applied to Flexural Capacity of vertical elements
Resistance Factor applied to Ground Nail Facing Capacity (Punching Shear)
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Aruada, CO 80007
Page 1of7
4. Earth Pressure Flr:= if(ts = 0,F6r,For)
F2r:= if(t1 = 0,F6r,FOr)
ru ,= "or(g).
.o(p)-
Ka = 0.307
.o.(p) *
xo,= .o(F).*(p) *
Kp = 3'zss
*(B) -
Active Load
ru := (o.os.ru.1. H).yr.
Pa = 527psf 7E1'25'H = 550ft
a:=
Pa
a = 1.49ft
y.(IKp - K")
n"1:= f6f
nu2:= fo-f
R6:= q'fla'ft
Passive Load
Yp.1 :=
Ypu2:=
Yp6:=
^H
3
g+z!
3
(H+d)
2
Ral = 58001b
RaZ = 393 lb
Rar = 50001t
YRat = 14.67ft
YRa2=22.99ft
Ynn: = t+'t n
Active ep
Active ep below mudline
Surcharge
Pp:= y.(t<o - ru).1a - a;Pp = l666Psf
Ynp = 26'o: ftRO:= PO
(d - a).ft Yn.:= H+ a+ (d - a).: R^=39221b'.r,..?Y
5. Depth of Embedment
Depth of embedment (guess)
Sum Moments:
(Change d until sum of moments is approximately zero)
increase d if moment is positive
decrease d if moment is negative
(Rur.ynur)+ (n"2.vp"2)+ (n6.vp6)- (*o.t*J - r.(r.1 + L2+ L3 + La + L5) = 0ft.kip
1.0.d = 6.2ft
1.2.d = 7.44ft
1.4.d = 8.68 ft
1.0.d+H=28.2ft
1.2.d + H=29.44ft
1.4.d+H=30.68ft
Set user defined embedment depth F,t= Eq
Ft = 30ftFI1:= H+ du
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada. CO 80007
Page 2 ot 7
checked by:
6t25t2007
6. Determine the equivalent steel Area and Moment of Inertia of the composite section
for each MP section in the MP shoring wall:
Es:= 57000.,,J8T;; Ec = 3.122 x l06psi Elastic (Young's) Modulus for Grout
Es
n",= f*- nc = 9.289 Modular Ratio
no := itfoo = o ,
USD' lin
,
D0)
*o = 0.625 in outside Pipe Radius\- t6'2)
/ usor.tin Dr\
Rl := if[Dr =0,-i-,t ) Rr = 0.625in
n: := if(nO = o,bo,R0 - to) R3 = 0.625in Outside Grout Radius
n+:= if(Rl = o,br,Rl - tr) R4 = o.625in
n2,= P.1.;n R2=0.625in OutsideRebarRadius- : v.\t/.J rrr usDrn'z R2l:= ----j'l'in
L-Ltl
1L",,=f'lftnola-tn:lal* (R3)'-n2'**rcl r- .-.,,.,,-4 Momentof InertiaandAreaof
' L nc j Ifiont = 0.r2in4 fronl ffi'[il;;#'bection.
L - .-..4 --4 I
,o*n'=l.l[t*rta-tn+la]* (R4)'-R2t' **,ol ru".k=0.12in4 back4L- nc 'l
l---221
Afront:=^.lLt*olt-(n:)21* (R3)-.-R2- **rzl Afront= t.227inz front
Lncl
L-221
Aback:= ".1[1*,y'- (R4)2] * (R4)- - R2t- * *,tl Aback= 1.227in2 back
t nc 'l
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Higtvay 72
Arvada. CO 80007
Page 3 ot7
checked by:
6t25t2007
f! + lin\;=-:- N=361lin
i := r .. N L. := i'in H= 22ft IIt = 30ft
I
Aback
Q- IS1/\
,o(. := L..tan\o., + dl c. :=
-
tan(or)=0.26S
t Ao-*. Ou-*
s1 Ss
.,', , ,)
Igonl + Afunt.{c.l- I6nsl( + A6acl(.(xx. - c.l-
tSosl
I.:= IMP.ll
oFs.Fly'I. OFs.F2y.t.
1\{ln_:=
-
\,12n.:= .:
' h t Dryrbc.+- xx.-c.+-r2 ll2
max(Mln) = 367 kip max(M2n) = l83kip
Right side loading diagram
^ l.
Pn := --9- + | ((.os.x,'y.i.in)) ir l.in - 3 3 11.-i H+ d 1.. ,, 2
I o otherwise
Left side loading diagram
"r,'= l[r.(q-ro).ti.ir,-(n+a)]] if i.in>H+3 Passiveearthpressure-, l' ' '
I o otherwise
Anchor Loads
rur :=
f
r if i.in=Lr raz := lr if i.in= L2 t6.:= lr ir i.ln=I-: Pa+,:= lr if i.in=L4 nas := lr if i.in =Ls
l0 otherwise l0 othe.*ise l0 other*ise l0 otherwise l0 otherwise
Yenter Companies, Inc. Page 4 ol7
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada. CO 80007 AAVtrNT'trR
V:=o^-!Uft
for ie l..N
o. <-
[0.s.(en
* h,_,) - (o, *
"r,_,)].(",-
L,_,)] + D,_,
TD.<-D.-OcT if L.=H-Ll
D.<-D,-oc.] if L.=H-Lzr l -ft |
TD.<-D.-oc.; if L.=H-L3
TD.<-D.-OC'n if L.=H-LC
Q<-D,-ocl if L.=H-L5I r -ft l
M:= h Do <- lb
for ie l..N
n, <- [0.s.(v, + v,_,).(t , - L,_,)] * D.,
D
R:=
D
th
R <- 0.=ft ax:=
for i e 0..N
ifL.>rt
ln <- v.IT
I
lbreak
Do € o.*
for ie l..N
lo -o if Li<Hr
lo, * o.t11t* * pR,_,) - (*, * er,_,)].(",- r,_,) ir r. > r4
D
R = -20.8e39ft
an:= lan AR = {.35a& P:= -PL
Mmx:= max(M) Mmx =Z+.l!akip.!6 Maximum (factored) Momeni
Mmn:= min(M) Mmn = -106.862 kip Minimum (factored) Moment
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada, CO 8ff107
Page 5 of 7 AA
VtrSflT'trR
checked by:
6t2512007
M1n = front row allowable momenl = red line
M2n = back row allowable moment = blue line
M = applied moment = green line
H=22ft.
rt=30ft
c1 := min(Mln - M)
c2 := min(M2n - M)
Checkyll := if(ct < -2lb, "Check Front Row. ,'OK')
Checky2n := if(c2 < -2lb, "Check Back Row" ,'OK')
max(M, Mln, M2n) = 367 YiO
max(M) = 24;l04krp
ln = "OK"
='OK"
l0
Applied & Allowable Moment Diagram
\
\
\
I
)
L
ft
c'L.E-
;fto-----Al
ft
20
30 0 50 r00 150 200 2so 300 350 400
Mln M2n M
kip kip kip
Moment (kipiff/ft)
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada. CO 80007
Page 6 of 7
Acvive earth pressure resultant
Number of piles per ft
Active force per pile
Shear strength of one pile
,"'=$*o
"o'= *. i
t"o,= ft
Pa= r3.e23+
*o=t*
Pap = 13.923kiP
+,= ,0,.,,, [(#)'.,"{fo = 32.2lakiP fS",= I_ pap FSr = 2.314
Micropiles per foot
Number of micropiles
Drilling
Length of cap
tpt,= a + f-51 Ss
N*O:= mpf .Le7
bhf := Nmp.It
mpf=tl-ft
Nmp=o
bhf=0ft
Lw=Oft
Yenter Companies, Inc.
20300 W. Highway 72
Arvada, CO 80007
PageT o17
e V?p,)r*'.
?* " ?ao76
lle 6.s
Frvvm'. -[V
^*fur lnfanvnzOqru a9
,
?tnr'. DLl?e' .-L?\LO
rr, tz?4$
(Qa*qe'. !g; 1e'ot*: h6
tL" \€,a?u?
tvsr^v-f- - GlTr tq"o,1,.6.,DL* t6?op,+ r.
LL" zdcut /iLzTi?at
C'atet-x
wq,ffi:
fuy*
jL" #
v'iSt zy+
I
ll
t
I
!
I
I
7aaq*
,h'/bo7#
(taur.1,72y.l.Nr)
--c'
, l5ryev
tb, Atc,pof
H;
t l'7-7o+ tf6a
+ ttg'a z 35?a
''1,'tu,3) ,rJ
,lll,r-vrt 6rlr.l;&1
. 87$7€
lfGU ,la+
h!,= l-hlz't
U.t'g Sfyr+r}
/t.?o'l.kg+ 16Z+ LL+bb + +4ot, + lt ae * +a4a - 2.t,46L7a* /
25 OH To,vn Square
Suite 200
Fort Collint CO 80524
th:970.225.9099
tax,.970.225.6923
PO. Box 1860
79050 US Hwy 40
Wirner Park, C0 80482
th: 970-722.7677
Fax: 970.722.7 679
.t,''c
tu PLF
' /a*ry ri;(*'s, /tt4tt7t-F
2:"/,7 65 t*
1319 spruce SM
EdrH€{ CO 80302
Phi 303.i144.1951
Fo( 303.444.19t
LF,, 7tr1:r+ /,// q 45 ,
t/, /tur..t:,qt), 1-p:D(t?,0)/,of ,f o =-,*r,l/& . 1rt,+p,y' )'(r_r'),' suif,r /ap t,ht. 7 s,4,u)-rl/
Nu '^ na.)Qa7' f) ., t z oay tf^ / | \F+, /z (/zrytf:1iZt/r:, //r d"fF t # 4a* te,,qrr)
2{F" !eE* /,/,{ro "1, y,li*yLur d,- *'a74r*)
ilu: DL /tL+ tfi-e. *r, , ,u{onu r *{7,o * ,r{rn * *{v*- s
/r'7! 1t"r> = 3'-r.' /)tDE. /
H3 a g6aa pn ,/*on . ,,"f I o" f
tlr/
4 /*l {urtrtt 77,6) = /f t:+7t{ ( rry f) :'tt "7"F
* g?af{ /
By; b D ll arkd. B),: _
levo: /213\
lrotr..at /tF.tat'
cttent: 3ls lJ
D Pr€limlnary O Flnal
:'or- ilo. { o-u;r)
rr7 i7,+tttu5 ,z!c E1€/
7 trt/ = 762," fL,>of)
fuuo //'akf /t,*)t zo*tF
l(/n, ze 1ts,*)/a, 5?,Ltr.-f*
,fls , saaTr(r.g'" {,f n ' (L-t!t-b /!
Y56- -ttE.k,a-r /<e
= rt/tt
f74.ae (u)
2,?'
fk//a
lil .,
35
VenbrCompan:"c
20300 Hwy72
Arvada, CO 8|n07
p 303.279.4i058
f 303.279.t!908
TlEe :
Dlgnt:
Dcecrlpdon :
Scop. :
Job t
tlNL: 9:37AM, 19 APR 07
Rectangular Concrete Column
Descriptaon Cerisola Underpinning
6.000
in
in
fc
Fy
Seismic Zone
4,000.0
60,m0.0 p6l
otal Height
Unbraced Length
Efi. tength Factor
Cotumn b BRAGEDd=3.000 in
0.000 in
LL & ST Loadt Acl SeparatEly
Code Ref ACr 3|8{2, 1997 UBG, 2003 BC' 2003 NFPA 5000
Load
'actorins
*pports 2003 tBC and 2003 NFPA 5000 by virtue dhsir ls erenc€s to ACI 31&02 fo concrete de8ign.
Faaoring of enl€rcd toads to unimste loads wihin thb progrem F according to ACI 318-02 C'2
Doad Loed
1 .000 k
1.400
1.700
1.700
1.1m
Llv. Lord
5.800 k
S[sdJelEB
k
78
0.900
1.300
Ecc€ntrlcltv
2.(X)0 inArLl Lo.dt
ActrdkLu/r 53.33:
N€utral Arb Dbiance
Phi
Mar Limit kl/r
Be{a - M:suEtained/M:max
Cm
Et/ 1000
Pc:pi^2Elr(kLuf2
4ha: MarPu / (.75 Pc)
Delta
Ecc' Ecc Loads + Moments
D6ign Ecc = Ecc ' D6lt€
Gl & C-2 DL
ACI C.l E G2 LL
ACt C-l &G2 ST
....sebmic = ST' :
Elastc Modulr3
ACI Eo. C-l
2.7300 in
0.7000
34.0000
0.1u3
0.6000
277.otr
206.67
0.0506
1.(x)00
2.000
2.qn
3,605.0 ksi
ACI Eo. C-2
2.7300 in
0.7000
34.0000
1 .0000
0.6000
155.74
166.78
0.0084
1.0000
2.fi'o
2.txto
B€Ta
ACI Eo. C-3
2.7300 in
0.7000
34.0000
1.0000
0.6000
155.71
r 66.78
0.0072
1.0000
2.000 in
2.1n0 in
Goup Factor
ACI C-3 Dead Losd Fac'tor
ACI C-3 Shotl T€|m Facfc
Addl "0.9" Factor tur S€i8mic
12.00 x 6.00in Column, Rebar: 2;f6 @ 3.00in
Apdied: Pu: ar Faolorcd
Allowable : Pn ' Pfti @ Itelrign Ecc'
M-cdlbal
Combined Eccenficity
Magnificditn Factor
De{ign Eccenticity
Menified D6(In iroment
Po' .80
P: Bal ced
Ecc : Balanced
ACr C-2
1.0t k
60J7 k
0.17 k-n
2.OCD h
1.@
2.000 in
o.17 k-ft
235.@ k
a.77 k
15.757 in
Column is OK
ACI CA
0.90 k
5037 k
0.15 k-n
zoo in
1.00
Z(Do in
0.15 k-n
235.@ k
8.7f k
15.75f in
W Ad 318-95 set,on 10.12 & 10.13
ACI Factors (perACl31eO2, applied ifter|ally to entered l€ds)
36oo
Datcz 3*-L9-2ffit $naillin 3.10 ?ilc: ccrl'srh
I'linimum Factor of Safetv = Z.AL
5.{ ft Dchlnd Uall Crcst
At llall f oe
H= 8-S ft
LEGEIID:
IrS= 25.4 lina
IryG .$.8 Xsi
$h= 4-A ft
$rr= 3-5 ft
GRr Pllr o0ll slc
1 138:s dil fE[ 'ITi
Scale - 16 ft m Surchar.gre
'I
FiIe: cerisola
***************************************************
* CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION :I
* ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER :T
* DIVISION OF MATERIALS AND FOUNDATIONS :T
* Office of Roadway Geotechnical Engineering *
* Date: 04-t9-2O07- Time: 09:33:28 *
**i************************************************
Project Identification - cerisola
--- TIALL GEOMETRY
VerticaL wall Height = 8.0 ft
Wal1 Batter = 0.0 degree
Angle Length
(Deg) ( Feet )
First Slope from Wallcrest' = 0.0 120.0
Second Slope from lst slope' = 0.0 0.0
Third Slope frohr 2nd slope. = 0.0 0'0
Fourth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0
Fifth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0'0 0.0
Sixth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0
Seventh Slope Angle 0.0
SLOPE BELOW THE WALI.,
There is NO SLOPE BELOII TIIE TOE of the wall
----- SURCHARGE ---------
THE SURCHARGES IMPOSED ON THE SYSTEM ARE:
Begin Surcharge - Distance from toe = 0.0 ft
End Surcharge - Distance from toe = 3.0 ft
Loading Intensity - Begin = 2000.0 psf/ft
toading Intensity - End : 2000.0 psf/ft
Begin Second Surcharge - Distance from toe = 3.0 ft
End Second Surcharge - Distance flom toe = 10.0 ft
Loading Intensity - Begin = L920.0 psflft
Loading Intensity - End = 1920.0 psf/ft
oPTroN #1 ---------
Factored Punching shear, Bond E Yield Stress are used.
----- SOIL PARAMETERS
Unit Friction Cohesion Bond* Coordinates of Boundary
Soil gfeight Angle Intercept Stress xsl YS1 xS2 YS2
Layer (Pcfl (Degree) (Psf) (Psi) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 135.0 34.O 100.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0
* Bond Stress also depends on BSF Factor in Option *5 when enabled.
Page - 1
38
Fil-e: cerisola
WATER SURFACE ---------
NO gfater Table defined for this problenr.
SEARCH LIMIT ---------
fhe Search L,init is from 0.0 to 16.0 ft
You have chosen NOT TO LIMIT the search of faifure pLanes
to specific nodes ,
REINFORCEMENT PARMETERS ---------
Nurnber of Reinforcement Leve1 3
Horizontal Spacing = 4.0 ft
Diameter of Reinforcement Element = 1.250 in
Yield strese of Reinforcement = 45.0 ksi
Diameter of Grouted Hole = 4.0 in
Punching Shear = 25.0 kiPs
(For ALL Levelsl
Reinforcement Lengths = 10.0 ft
Reinforcement Inclination = 15.0 degrees
Vertical Spacing to First Level = 1.0 ft
Vertical. Spacing to Rennining Levels = 3.0 ft
Page - 2
39
Fi-l,e : cerisof a
MINIMUM
SAFETY
FACTOR
Toe 2.257
Reinf. Stxess at
MIN IMUM
SAFETY
FACTOR
NODE 2
2.O6'7
Reinf, Stress at
MINIMUM
SAFETY
FACTOR
NODE 3
2.015
Reinf. Stress at
MINIMUM
SAFETY
FACTOR
NODE 4
2.010
Reinf. Stress at
MINIMUM
SAFETY
FACTOR
NODE 6
2.O98
Page -
DISTANCE LOVIER FAILURE
BEHIND PLANE
WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH(ft) (des) (ft)
1.6 51.3 I-.0
Levet 1 = 15.730 Ksi (puft_out
2 = 1,6.467 Ksi (Pullout
3 = I7.204 Ksi (Pullout
DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE
BEHIND PLANE
WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH(ft) (des) (ft)
3.2 51.3 1.0 70.4
Level 1 = L3.476 Ksi (Pullout
2 = 1-5.335 Ksi (Pullout
3 = 17.193 Ksi (Pullout
DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE
BEHIND PLANE
I{ALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH
(ft) (des) (ft)
4 .8 53.1 4 .0 63.4
Level 1 = 11.196 Ksi (Pu1lout
Z - 13.720 Ksi (pullout
3 - t'7 .240 Ksi ( Pullout
DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE
BEHIND PTANE
IilALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH(ft ) (deq1 (ft)
UPPER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH(des1 (ft)
82-4 '7.3
control-s . . . )
controls. . . )
controfs. . . )
UPPER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH
(deg) (ft)
't .6
aanr-rnl c \
controls. . . )
contro]s. . . )
UPPER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH(des) (ft)
5.4
controls . . . )controls. . . )
controls . . . )
UPPER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH(deq1 (ft)
6.4 4'1 .6 7.6 61 .9
Level 1 = 8.637 Ksi (Pullout
2 : 12.82'7 Ksi (Pullout
3 = l-7.031 Ksi (pullout
DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE
BEHIND PLANE
WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH(ft) (des1 (ft)
controls, . ,
controls. . .
controls. . .
UPPER FAILURE
PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH(des) (f t)
NODE 5
2.060 8.0 36.9 4.0 49.4 '7.4
Reinf. Stress at LeveL l: 7.348 Ksi (Pullout contro1s...)
2 : 11.338 Ksi (Pullout controls... )
3 : 16.557 Ksi (Pullout controfs... )
MINTMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FATLURE
SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE
FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH
(ft) (des) (ft) (des) (ft)
8.09 -6 32.0 4 .5 44.2
\' " ' Reinf . stress .. """L; :
NODE 7
2.3'73 Lt.2
Reinf. Stress at Level 1- 3.993 Ksi (Pullout controls.. ')2 = 9.191 Ksi (Pullout controls. ' . )
3 = 16.058 Ksi (Pullout controls' ' ' )
MINIMUM DISTANCE LOTIER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE
SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE
FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTIT ANGLE LENGTH
(ft) (deg1 (ft) (deg1 (ft)
NODE 82.7L4 72.8
Reinf. Stress at Level 1 =2=
3=
32.0 15.1 89.9 0.0
MINIMUM DISTANCE
SAFETY BEHIND
FACTOR WALL TOE(ft)
NODE 9
3.024 r4.4
Reinf. Stress at Level 1 =2=3-
MINIMUM DISTANCE
SAFETY BEHIND
FACTOR WALL TOE(fr)
NODElO
3.307 16.0 26.6 l'1 .9
Reinf. Stress at Level 1 : 1.038 Ksi
2 = 8.493 Ksi
3 : 15.947 Ksi
0.0
controls...
controls. . .
controls. . .
* For Factor of Safety = 1.9* Maximurn Average Reinforcement Working Force:*
t 1.84 6 Kips/leve1 *
********************************************************************
40
3:,3.312 il:i l;Iii:xl !3ttil: : :
16.295 Ksi (Puffout controls. . .
MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE
SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PTANE
FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH
(ft) (des) (ft) (desl (ft)
28 .2 5.1 39.8 8 .7
3.473 Ksi (Pullout controls... )
9.884 Ksi (Pullout control-s. . . )
16.295 Ksi (Pullout controls. . . )
LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAITURE
PLANE PLANE
ANGLE LENGTIT ANGLE LENGTH
(des1 (ft) (deg1 (ft)
29.r 16.5 89.9 0.0
2 .212 Ksi (PulLout contro1s...)
9,163 Ksi (PulLout controfs...)
16.11.5 Ksi (Puf]out controls. . . )
LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE
PLANE PLANE
ANGLE LENGTH A},IGLE LENGTH
(des1 (ft) (des1 (ft)
89.9
( Pullout
( Pul lout
( Pullout
********************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL. CO 81657
970-479-2138
Job Address:
Location....,:
Parcel No...:
Legal Description:
Project No :
805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
805 POTATO PATCH DR.
210106301019
Qrno*rr"Nr oF coMMUNIry oev?op^aBNr
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit #: EO7-O2ll
owNER IJARCI{, S.A,
c/o cERrsoLA
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIIJ
co 81657
APPLICANT SCOTTYIS EI,ECTRIC CO.
PO BOX 382
MINTURN
co 81545
License: 343-E
CONTRACTOR SCOTTYIS EIJECTRIC CO.
PO BOX 382
MINTURN
co 8164s
. License: 343-E
ISSUED
09t07/2007
wt07/2w7
03/05/2008
09/07 /2007
09/07/2007 Phone:(7]-9) 486-8299
09/07/20o'l Pbone: (7L9) 486-8299
959
FEE SUMMARY 1.t+ttttr+i.r**1.***:*:***:|l,t'}lr**'t{r!**dt:r+*:t++*ir*i++*******:t**:****)*
Toal Calculated Fees- )
Additional Fees------ >
Total Permit Fer----- >
Paymenb---------- >
BALANCE DUE.-.--- >
Desciption: ADD UNDERGROUND CONDUIT IN POURED WALL FOR ADDED DRJVEWAY
LIGHTING. RWIRE AND CONDUIT FOR 2 BOILER UPGRADFS. FISH
ROMEX FOR NEW FIREPLACE
Valuation: $0.00 Square feet:
Electric€l------ >
Investigation--- >
will cdl-------- >
TOTAL FEES-- >
Qql tt
s0.00
$4 .00
$0.00
Approvals:
Itern: 05000 EIJECTRICAI DEPARTI{ENr
09/o7/2OO7 SH
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENI
Action: AP
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
(BI-,DG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPI-,IANCE.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in firll the information required, completed an accurate plot
plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design
review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
ANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION STIALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOI,'R
?-7^ o 7
,--- APPucATroleLL ilor BE AccEprED rF rNcoMpLErlR uNsJ-GNED
^6114^\ Project#: PR,Io?-ooaq
[\.\I)e Buitdingpermit#: Oo?- o163.
mW €b7. OZ-[f ;i"'g;rffi?*$:*,o--
75 S. Frontage Rd,
Vall, Colorado 81657
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Elecbical Contractor:
5c"t+Y3 E\as{*rt Q,o,
Town of Vail Reg. No.:
3q3-E-
Contact Person and Phone #t:
Sca*t 0g.rrOson q?a-../ l.-ossfi
E-Mail Addrcss:Far#:
Conb?ctor Sionafure:_<--=--
..
*--t.-.',...5f\I --'r-< . \h N|\}*"A\r.{{)
COIIIPLETE SQ. Fd)TAGE FOR AREA OF WORK AND VALUATION OF WORK (Labor & l,laterials)
AMOUNTOF SQ FTIN STRUCTURE: q ELECTRICAL VALUATION: $ 3, 5oo, o o
Otrte at 97&328-8&40 or Yisit forPatel#
Parcel# Aio to63cl I Arl
rob Name: cERtso lq Job Address: ?oS ?"++to P**.il, D".,i e-
tegal Descdfion I loB I elocf: I Hting:Snbdivision:
otl$J{€nlt'n /,^ c. .,, .oi A
Engineer:Address:Phone:
Detailed descrifion of work: qOO ,rnO. aw4y.5W9. R.an ,r. qvrD c!6nDui{ Fo- a e.,ure opg,qbe $Tsil g*r-qa+.X.i ifii{.tu
WorkClass: New() Mdition( ) Remodelffi Repair( ) TempPower( ) Other( )
WorkType: Interior( ) Eterior( ) BothtrKI Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No ( )
TypeofBldg.r Single.tamilyp{ Duplo<( ) Multi-family( ) Commerciat ( ) Restaurant( ) Other( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: I No. of Accommodation Units in this building:
Is this permit for a hot tub: Yes ( ) No CX);-7 rE f
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes (X) No ( ) ll Does a Fire Sprinkler System iG:6(qWT[l [\\
******************!***********:l*********FOR OFFI(
ul(
tnl
B*b
sEP 06 2001 lll
;t USE ONL ?;wiioF VHn-'
F:\cdev\FORllS\PERMm\Bui lding\electicaur€rmiLU -23-2005. DOC Page I of 2 ruz3lzws
ffi,q::{1,
Amendment to the 2002 I{.E.C. Town of Vail Ordinance 4, Series of 2005
o @erhead services are not allowed in the Town of Vail.o Underground services shall be in conduit (F/C) ftom rhe dility transformer to the elecbic meter, main
disconnect switch, and to the first elecfical dls0ibution clrcuit breaker panel.o The main disconnect switch shall E rediily awible, andlocatd ne><t to the meter on the o<terior wall of
the sfucture. All underground conduits are required to be inspected befiore back-filling the trench.o In multi-family dwelling unib, no electical wirlng or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common
waffs and spaces are exenpto NM Cable (Romo<) an b ud only in singb and multi-famtf durdllngs net exditry 3 tutfs.
Tlp IIl,l annot E ud ln any bulHlng mixd with lfue A.B.E EHrIrn &S mtpntu.
cr Aluminum a nducfrtssmaller than size #8 are not permitted with the Town of Vail.
TOWN OFVAIL ELECTRICAL PER"TIIIT GUIDEUIIES
o All installations of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approwl from planning. This applicaUon will
not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable).o If this permit is for installation of an o<terior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over
30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit.
o If this permit is for installation of an o<terior hot tub or spa on any o<isting deck or elevated plafform,
a structural engineer must review the existing condiUon and veriff that it will support the added
concentrated load. Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped lefrer or drawing
with this application.o If this is a remodel in a multi-family buiHing with a homeowners association, a letter of permission
from the association is required.o If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required. Eletrial
one4ine and pnel *hedulu arc tqufud if lqd is adM or disttbution is alhrcd.
I have read and understand the above.
Signahrre Date Signed
.If you have any questions regarding the above information or have additional questions,
please contact tlre Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at970-479-2147. The inspector can be
rcached on Monday thru Friday mornings betnreen the hours of 8am and 9am. You may also
leave a voice mall and the inspectorwill call you back.
F :\cdev\FoRJ'lS\PERJ'1ITS\EUilding\electical-txrmit-l 1-23-2005. DOC Pa{le zot 2 Lrl23l20p/S
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
outrrr*T oF coMMUNlrY DEVELortt
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit #: M07-0214
3o1- o\G3
Job Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Status. . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 805 POTATO PATCH DR. Applied . . : 09/1212007
Parcel No...: 210106301019 Issued. . : 09/14/2007
Legal Description: -? i?"O -l -OO/1 Expires . .: 0311212008
Project No :
owNER LARCH, S.A. O9/72/2OO7
c/o cERrsoLA
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 81657
APPI-,ICANT WESTERN F]REPLACE SUPPLY, INO7/72/2OO7 PhONC: 568-3760
1685 PAONIA
col-,o sPRrNGs, co 80915
PO BOX 570
MINTURN, CO
Llcense:323-M
CONTRACTOR WESTERN FIREPLACE SUPPLY, INO9/I2/2OO7 PhONC: 65A-3760
1585 PAONIA
COLO SPRINGS, CO 80915
PO BOX 570
MINTURN, CO
License:323-M
Desciption: INSTALL GAS FIREPLACE
Valuation: $2,399.91
Fireplace Information: Restricled: # ofcas Appliances: 0 # ofGas Logs: 0 # of Wood Pellet: 0
* * * t )a * l **:t * *:t 'i l' * t
Mechanical--> 960. oo Restuarant Plan Review--> go, oo Total Calculated Fees--> $?9,00
Plan Check--> gls. oo TOTAL FEES--'-----------> g?9. oo Additional Fees------> $0.00
Investigation-> go. oo Total Permit Fee-------> S?9.00
Will Call---> g4.0o Payments---------------> $79.00
BALANCE DUE-----> $o. oo
+ **ltt*tt+l+* l++,i
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
09/1,2/2007 cgunion Action: AP
rtem: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONDITION OF APPROVALCond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 22
(BLDG.): COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 7 OF THE 2003 IMC AND SECTION
304 OF THE 2OO3 IFGC AS MODIFIED BY TOWN OF VAIL.
\
Cond: 23
(BLDG. ) : BOIILER INSTALLATIO
CHAPTER 1"0 OF THE 2OO3 ]MC.
Cond: 25
ST CONFORM TO MANUFACTTIRERI TRUCTIONS AND
(BLDG.): GAS APPLIANCES SHALL
Cond: 29
(BLDG.): ACCESS TO MECHANICAL
IMC AND C}IAPTER 3 OF THE 2OO3
Cond: 31
BE VENTED ACCORDTNG TO CHAPTER 5 OF THE 2OO3 TFGC.
OF THE 2OO3
(BI-,DG.): BOII-,ERS SHALL BE MOITNTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONST. UNLESS
LISTED FOR MOUNTTNG ON COMBUSTTBI.,E FLOORTNG.
Cond: 32
(BLDG.): PERMIT.PLANS AND CODE ANALYSIS MUST BE POSTED IN MECHANICAL ROOM PRIOR
TO AN INSPECTION REQUEST.
Cond: 30
(BLDG. ) : BOILER ROOMS SHALL BE EQUIPPPED WITH A FLOOR DRAIN OR OTHER APPROVED
HT.:--l?-1'-:.-T-""::-]'T:"-::-:f:*'-r:::,.'"-':".:,::,:.:-"J--.1l.1l;j;-'i''t:t|l't*,}:t'+'+,|'*:*lltt,t*||*+t't,|l|||'***
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is conect. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR 1NSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY.FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:OO AM - 4 PM,
o
S INS
o
NMU
EQUIPMENT MUST COMPI,Y WITH CHAPTER 3
IFGC..
WNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER
\
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statem€nt
**** a r i t t * t t i l * t * * * + + t * * * * * *t I * i i * * * * + *+**** { + + + f * * * * * * * * * * I * * t * * * * * ** * * * *** + * * * * * {' * * * * i * * * *
statement Nunber: R070001861 Amount: $79.00 09/).4/2o01r2.37 PM
Pavment Method:check T|.r i i ' T.a
NoEation: *272L/coRY
DENISSEN FOR WESTERN FIREPI.,ACE
Permit No; VI07 -0214 T)rpe: MECHANICAL, PERMIT
Parcel No: 2101- 053 - 0101- 9
SiEe Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
Locat.ion: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
Total- Fees:
This Payment.:$79.00 TOtAl AIJIJ PMI S :
Balance;
$79.00
$79.00
$0.00
* *** * t ** * * ** * * *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *** * * * !t * * * * * * rt* * * * * * f* * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * * *******ti* ** ****
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account code DescripEion Current Pmts
MP 001000031-t_11_00
PF 00100003112300
wc 00100003112800
MECHANICAIJ PERMIT FEES
PI,AN CHECK FEES
WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
ou. uu
15.00
4 .00
AppucATroN wrLL Nor BE AccEprED rF rNcoMpLErE oR u{+cffil67 , il29
TOV Project #.\_
AA,,^j1 62,* ?il]5i*ln::,ffi
i' 1" I - v'! | 970-479-2149 (Inspectlons)
75 S. Frontag€ Rd.
Vall, GoJorado 8[,557
Xfi'/
o Mechanlcal Room Dlmenslonso Combustlon Alr Duct Slze and LocaUono Flue, Vent and Gas Une Slze and Locationo Heat Loss @lcs.o EquipmentCut/SpecSheets
Permit will not be accepted without the following:
Provide Mechanlcal Room Layout drawn,to scale. to Include:
'I
VALI'ATION FOR MECHANICAL PERMIT bor &
Parcel#
JobName: C-yrr-c&a- Ao:cd!--^c,Job Address; gCg fut .h, Rkh
Legal Description Lot:Block:Fillng:Subdlvlslon:
Owners Name:Address:PlEEtr[VE at\
Engineer:Address:ugne:
DeQiled descripUon of work:r0dn I i lt -l-'h T0 tQl f UO ZUU I ul
rowN !.E-yalL_-
BoilerLocation: Interior( )_Exteriorl ; Other( )Does an EHU exist at this location; Yes ( ) No ( )
Typeof Bfdg: Single-famllykz{Ouptex( ) Multi-family( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant( ) Other( )
No. of ExisUng Dwelling UniE ln this building:No. of AccommodaUon Units in thls building:
No/Type of Flreplac€s.Exlstinq: Gas Apoliances ( ) Gas Loqs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burnino (
Noflype of FireplacesiProposed: Gas Appliances ( 1) Gas Logs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burnlng (NOTAUOWED)
Is this a conversion from a wood burning fireplace to an EPA Phase II device? Yes ( ) No (
*f f**t*****r************FoR oFFICE USE ONLy********'r*:r.*rr****************
Vr;xB++?elz*
/o/'*7, aft I
cor i.ttlY oElELft€r{r
Dmign Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road. Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 taxj. 979.479.2452
web: www,vailgou.com
Project Name: Cerisola Residence
Project Description:
Participants:
owNER |-ARCH, S.A.
PO BOX 33,10
VAIL
co 81658
License: C000001763
ProjectAddrcss: 805 POTATO PATCH DRVAIL
805 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1,
Location:
Legal DescripUon: Lot: 29 Blod<: 1 Subdivision: VAIL POTATO PATCH
Parcel Number: 2101-063{101-9
Comments: Seeconditions
DRB l{umber: DR8070437
Final review of change to approved plans - reduce scope of work from residential addition to the
remodel of existing driveway and retaining walls, change driveway material
0812212007
c/o cERIsot-A
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 81657
APPUCANT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHffi0S/2212007 Phone: 970-476-220L
Motion By:
Second By:
Voter
Conditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACTTOil
ACtiON: STAFFAPR
Date of Approva,2 09 | 05 12007
Cond: 8
(P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building, Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion,
Planner: WarrenCampbell DRB Fee Paid: S2O.O0
Changes To The Approved Plans
Application for Design Review
All projects requiring design rwiew mu* receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application' Please
refdr tir ttre submittal requiremenb for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Revietv
cannot be accepted untii all required information is received by the Community Development Department' The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Torrun Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Crmmission.
b"lign r"iri.* approval lapses unless a buitding permit is issuedTnd construction com{ences witfiin
oneyearoftheapproval. ( PboT-OqUJ n
Department of Community Development '
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
teli 970.479.2128 fax: 970.479'2452
web: www.vailgov'com
General Information:
of the
Physical Address:
Parcel No.:(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no')
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Malling Address:
t], rsrer(s) Sign
N rrre ot Applicant:
F{,:iling Address:
E.
Type of Review and Fee:
O Changes to Approved Plans $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
Submittal Requirements:
3 Sets of Plans Addresslng Proiect Changes
Signature of Homeowner(s) or Association
$s\l
o
nail Address:
Ftcdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\DRB\drb-change-to-approvedlclans-lloage-05-l 1'2006'doc
at*tatl*ill* * * {' *'l' * * t t t * 'l 'l* * * * * 1* * * t * * 'l t{.* * * 'lt | * * * * * {l I * f 't I 't I 't * * f I * 'r {' * r* i * | * * * * * * t * * * * i *l I i I I *
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
* **** * 't 't | * | * * I * * * * * * * * * '|':t I I i * * * * * * * * ** l' 'l 'l {'
'l' 'l {' 'l ttl t * 'l' 'l 'l 'l 'l * '|t't * 'l**'t'l'* *'l**********,lt'l ttll*t* ***t*
Sgatemen! Number: R070001536 Amount: $20,00 Oe/22/200702249 Pl[
Pal'ment, MeEhod: check hit: LT
Notatsion: Snovtdon &
Hopkins ArchitecCg / ck 825
Pennit, No: DR807043? Type 3 DRB-Chg Eo Appr Plang
Parcel No: 2101- 053 - 0101- 9
Sit,E AddTeEE: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIIJ
IJocat,Lon: 805 Potato Patch Drive /Lr,t 29, Block l,
Ahis Pa)menE:$20.00
'l't lf l I I i + ***** *tr*t I i * * I ********** * * lt ttt*lt I I I I *t I I tt * | I i I * i i i I * i I *
ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descript ion
DR 00100003L]-2200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES
Total FeeE:
Total ALL Pmt,s :
Balance:
$20.00
$20.00
90.00
Current Pmts
20.00
t,
J
o
-rl
-l
O
a
Fa-)
-4
,J
i9I
tr-i
I!Fti:
l3
T{
iil
EiI;ii
I
ii;tii
!tiiiill*l
:F!ii.;)if
!
titiiiii ii
a
6
\;
*'sl'#
im
zo
Fz
1!
m
1Ot-
z
'.1' \
-:':r'll'.el
Fzzo
m
$iriiiiiiiiiiii
Egiiititlt 9 r)tic F qsP!" e Ei.l 6 i:5t
?i:ii: {3ti!Y5!
$
l$
A
J
)
t
Snordon a.d Hoddns . Ard Ects. P.C.
P.o. Ed334O 0riJ.r6.a2o1
V|l, C&Eb At65A FA( 47&7a!r
f l*ffi] cERtsoLA RESIDENcE - pRoposED DRtvEwAy MoDtFtcAloN.- f--;*1 LOT29, BLOCK 1, POTATO PATCH
5 | lvrrr-,coLoRADo
frtn*Vta/r,fm,dEl
Design Review Board
ACTIOil FORIi
Department of Commun ity Development
75 South Frontage Road. Vail, Colorado 81657
tel:970.479.2tr39 fax:970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.comoomttffi 0EtE nFtC r
Prolect Name: Cerisola Res. AddiUon
Project Description:
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
@nditions:
DRB Number: DR8070135
FINAL APPROVAL FOR AN ADDMON OF GRFA TO BUILD RETAINING WALL, ELEVATOR IN
EXISTING GAMGE, ENI.ARGE THE DGSTING GAMGE TO PARK 3 CARS AND ADD ONE
BEDROOM BELOW.
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Acdon: STAFFAPR
Date of Approvalz 05/0212007
C,ond: I
(Pl4N): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult wlth
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activlties.
Cond: 201
Partcipants:
owNER I-ARCH, S.A.
c/o cERrsoLA
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 81557
o4l03l20o7
APPUCANT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHflE04/03/2007 Phone 970'476-220t
PO BOX 33,t0
VAIL
co 816s8
License: C000001763
ARCHffiCT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHffi04/03/2007 Phonez 970-476-220t
PO BOx 33,10
VAIL
co 81658
License: C000001763
Proiect Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Location: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
Legal Description: loh 29 Block: l Subdivision: VAIL POTATO PATCH
Parcel ]{umber: 2101-063-0101-9
Gomments: SeeConditions
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond:202
Approval of this project shall lape and become void one (1) year following the date
of final apprwal, unless a building permit is issued and consffuction is commened
and is diligently pursued toward completion,
Cond: CON0008855
Fire sprinkler system required and shall comply with NFPA 13R(2002) and VFES
standards.
Cond: CON0008856
Monitored fire alarm sysGm required and shall comply with NFPA 72(2002) and VFES
standards.
Cond: CON0008860
The applhant shall remove the full kitchen from the addition and show a wet bar
design so as to not create a seond unit on the pmperty. This change shall be made
at the time of building permit application submittal.
Cond: CON0008861
The plat adjusting the propefi line between Lots 29 and 30 shall be submitted on
mylar to staff and recorded prior to submittal of building permits.
Planner: Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: f3(Xl.OO
Zone Check
Legal descriptiory
Address s
owner &.itl^
Architect kns
Zone district
Lot size O, S3
Height
Setbacks
Proposed use
Buildable area
Existinq Proposed
rotalGRFA q@+wo+Jet!_
Primary GRFA +(425) (675*)=
Secondary GRFA +(425) (675")=_
" 675 = 425 credit plus 250 addition
Does this rFquest involve a 250 Addition? lf yes, how much of the allowed 250 addition is used with this request?
AJD
Allowed
1, slll|
Total Remainino
65-n _Mu
site Coverage )O'L
5,iH:;1
* &4*= 3ts1 )%n
ga'
15'./ts'TY
(30)@
Front
Sides
Rear
33
20'
15'
15'
,u,^nl^l?arfto
Phone
Phone
lt'lrosgn
Are finished grades less than 2:1 (50%) Ve. X No
-
Environmental/Hazards 1) percent Stope (< ?lO%) OtBf W'
2) Floodplain
3) Wetlands
4) Water Course Setback.(3O) (50)
5) Geologic Hazards
a) SnowAvalanche
b) Rockfall /vtdt*,
c) Debris Flow
Previous conditions of approval (check property file):
ls the Property non-conforming? Describe:
Lrr"llA a\ro€dLJ r-*Iil*
Design Review Checklist
Project:
tr SURVEY
-
Spotelevations
SITE PLAN
Scale
Legal description
Lot Size
Buildable Area
Easements
Topography
100 yr. flood plain
Water Course Setback
Environmental Hazards
Trees
Utili$ locations
Scale
Building Height
Encroachments
setualtrsl "r'\\ 'tr{r
'Eaves / Overhangs (4")
Decks / Balconies
Garage connection
Site Grade / Slope
Retaining Walls
( "..
Scale
. .', EHU
tr BUILDING ELEVATIONS' .'
Scale
Color / Materials
Roof Pitch
Existing trebs
MISCELLANEOUS' .
iop'doApproval
-a',i!
GRFA
. r. _ l.a{e. \i,r. :t tl
+ 250 additionalGRFA
Crawl / Attic Space
t -..1 l'
tr
Title report (A&B)
Utilitv verifi cation form
-.:.-,-
Photos of site
-r
Buildino material samples ,v,..., - -1..r '.lj..(.
C.O. Verification
Sun / Shade Angles
Utilities (underground)
View Corridors
Variances
Plat restrictionsParking / Garage
Turning Radius
:'j;' )D';t':
way (accdJgani draoe)
i. -,..$now Storage
-'
1 ' r .'' "Fire Access
. . a ' ril r' .' ,t'-' t' I i
. i.1 <
Additions-Residential or Commercial
Application for Design Review
walls, etc.
$20 For ievisions to plans already approved
Review Board.
No Fee
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 97 0.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
Ali projecls requiring design review must recelve approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to
the submittal requirements for the pafticular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be
acrepted untll all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need
to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Fnvironmental Commission, Design review apProval lapses
unless a buitding permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval'
Physical Address:
Pa rcel No.:Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.)
Name(s) of Owner(s):4,
Mailing Addressl il,
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Narne of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
v
rrt
G,
3
o
Type of Review and Fee:
n S;gns
I Conceptual Review
n New Construction
K acdition
n l'linor Alteration
( multi-family/commercial)
n Minof Alterauon
{single-famllY/duPlex)
D Changes to ApProved Plans
tl Separation Request
$50 gUS $1.00 per square foot of total sign area'
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild'
igOO For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
.o.rnut.iuf Ouifaing (includes 250 additions & interior conversions)'
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements' such as'
iurooRng, pain-ting, window- additions, landscaping' fences and retaining
walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements' such as'
reroofing, painting, *inao"- additions, landscaping' fences and relaining
by Planning Staff or the Design
(Contact Eagle Co.
Zoning:
Pa,.re 1of L2104/78104
{'++tl'**'}*********++++**************++*+++t********+*******a+************+*+**************+**
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
*+*++i+t**'ll'r*********+++*t+++r********************'i******{'+*****{'*l+f++***+********+***'1*'t{.
Statement Number 3 R070000400 Amount: $300.00 04/03/2OO7O1 :23 PM
Palment Method: Check
HOPKINS
Init: iIS
Notation: 793/SNOYIDON
$300.00
********:t*+*t+**'itr************************f,***l'*!t**it'irtrt'tt*++***+***********++**************
ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Current Pmts
DR 00100003LL2200 DESTG1N REVTEW FEES 300.00
Permit No: DRBO70135 TlTre: DRB - Addit.ion of GRFA
Parce1 No: 2101-053 - 0101-9
Site Addrees: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIII
Irocation: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
Tota1 Fee6:
Tota1 ALIr Pmts !
Balance:
Descript,ion
Thie Payment.:
$300.00
$300.00
$o. oo
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
Botanical Name Common Name
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
EXISTING TREES
TO BE REMOVED
Size
------'f----- |
ln'- ll'
4''4t'
ta
Minimum Requirements for Landscaping:Deciduous Trees - 2" C:,liPer
Coniferous Trees - 6' in height
Shrubs - 5 Gal.
Tvoe Square Foolaqe
GROUND COVER
SOD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL
wMF aFM*s+ 1trh 'rb utrr& 6\qnflb
$alwrtNa
Please speciry other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.)
F: \cdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\DRB\drb-addiUon-1-25-2007.doc Page 8 of 14 ru23l20os
Buildino Materials
PROPOSED MATERIALS
Tvpe of Material Color
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting
Other
Notes:
(p*7
rp u#v+ nvr<Tt
tlb
NA
aW.(W.
rt.hD
(r'
P|easespeciffthemanufacturer,sname,theco|ornameandnumberandattachaco|ordtip'
To tltw* exsfl*a
F:\cdev\FoRMs\PermiE\Planning\DRB\drb-addition-1-25-2007'doc Page 7 of 14 trl73lzoos
American land Title Association Commitment - 1982
TITLE INSIJRANCE COMMITMEI{T
BY
stewart
r title guaranty company
Order Number: 6038331
We agree to issue policy to you according to the t€rms of the Commitment. When we show the policy amount and
your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment b€comes effective as of the Commitment Dat€
shown in Schedule A.
If the Requir€ments shown in this Commitment have not be€n met within six months after the Commitment Date, our
obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is
issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy.
Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following:
The Provisions in Schedule A.
The Requirements in Schedule B-1.
The Exceptions in Schedule B-ll.
The Conditions on Pase 2.
This Commitment is not vatlo ittrout SCHEDLLE A and Sections I and II of SCHEDULE B.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT. EXAMINATION, REPORT OR REPRESENTATION OF FACT OR
TITLE AIID DOES NOT CREATE AND SIIALL NOT BE THE BASIS OF A}{Y CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE,
NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION OR OTHER TORT CLAIM OR ACTION. THE SOLE I,IABILITY OF
COMPANY AND ITS TITLE INSURANCE AGENT SHALL ARISE UNDER AND BE GOVERNED BY PARAGRAPII
4 OF TEE CONDITIONS.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and s€al to be hereunlo
affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A.
stenruart
r tdro gua.anty co.npany
Countersigned:
Stewart Title of Colorado - Vail Division
97 Main St., Suite W-201
Edwards, CO 81632
Order Number: 6038331
l of 2 Commitn€nt - 235 WO Dsclosure
COMMITMBNT F1OR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULEA
l. Effective Date: November 27,2006 at 8:00 a.m.
2. Policy or Policies To Be Issued:
COUNTY OFEAGLE
STATE OF COI,ORADO.
Purported Address:
807 Potato Patch Drive
Vail. Colorado 81657
STATEMEI{T OF CHARGES
These charges are due and payable
before a Policy can be issued:
PREMIUM:
Mortgage: $100.00
Order No: 6038331
Amount of Insurance
(a) A.L.T.A. Owner's
Proposed Insured:
TO BEDE-TERMINED
(b) A.L.T.A. Loan
(Standard)
3. The estate or interest in tle land described or referred to in this Commifinent and covered heein is:
Fee Simple
4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in:
lnt29:
LARCH. S.A.. A PANAMANIAN CORPORATION
I.ot 3O:
CALUME'I HOLDINGS, S.A., A PANAMANI,AN CORPORATION
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
I-0TS 29 and 30,
BIOCK 1,
VAIUPOTATO PATCH,
According to the plat recorded March 5, l974in Book 233 at Page 629 as Reception No. 1295n -
STEWART TITLE
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSIJRANCE
SCIIEDIILE B-Section I
REQUIREMENTS
Order Number: 6038331
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
l. Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
2. hoper instrumen(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed
for record, to wit:
3. This report is for informational purposes only. No policy will be issued.
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTT COMPATIY
CqnmiErcnt - Sch€dulc B I
PaqeIdI
Onler Noder: 6038331
,
COMMITMENT F1OR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULEB-Section2
EXCEPTIONS
Order Number: 6038331
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to
the satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any facts, which a
correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose, and which are not shown by the public
records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
laws and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
commitment
6. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance
thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
7. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales.
8. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation
or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area.
9. Reservations or exceptions in Patents, or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, including the
reservation of a right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as
reserved in United States Patent recorded August 15, 1935 in Book 93 atPage2i78.
10. Restrictive Covenants recorded March 5, 1974in Book 233 at Page 628 as Reception No. 129526 and
as amended in instrument recorded September 24, l9l5 in Book 241 at Page 950 as Reception No.
138069.
1 1. All matters shown on the plat of VaiVPotato Patch, recorded in Book 233 atPage 629 as Reception
No. 129527.
12. Easement Deed dated August 6, l98l recorded at Book 327,Page 614 as Reception No. 223n6.
(The above items affect both l-ots 29 and 30)
STEWART IITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Commihn€nt - Schedul€ B 2
Page I of 2
Order N!|$er: 6038331
13. A Deed of Trust dated February 18,lgy2,executed by S.A. Iarch, a Panamanian Corporation, to the
Public Trustee of Eagle County, to secure an indebtedness of $4O0,000.(X) in favor of California
Commerce Bank recorded December 28, 1993 in Book 628 atPage 668 as Reception No' 5?4729'
14. A Deed of Trust dated November 9, 1999, executed by larch, S.A., a Panamanian Corporation, to the
Public Trustee of Eagle County, to secure an indebtedness of $1,fi[,fi)0.00 in favor of California
Commerce Bank recorded December 28 ,1999 as Reception No. 7189i2.
(Ihe above items affect Lot29)
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Commitnent - Schcdule B 2
Plge 2 d2
Otder Number: 6038331
DISCLOSURBS
Pursuant to C.R. S. I 0- I I - I 22, notice is hereby given that:
A. THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECI-AL TAXING DISTRICT;
B. A CERTIFICATE OFTAXES DUE USTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED
FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORZED AGENT;
C. INFORMATION REGARDING SPECI.AL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER. OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR
NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity
shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title
entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the
transaction which was closed." hovided that Stewart Title of Colorado - Vail Division conducts the closing of
the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception
number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the lender's Title Policy when issued.
NOTE: AfFrrmative Mechanic's Lien hotection for the Owner may b available (typically by deletion of Exception No.
4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the
following conditions:
A. The land described in Schedule A of this commifinent must be a single-family residence, which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
B. No labor or materials have been fumished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the
land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C. The Compny must receive an appropriate afFrdavit indemniflng the Company against unfiled Mechanic's
and Materialmen' s Liens.
D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate pr€mium.
E. H there has been construction, improvements or rnajor repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased,
within six months prior to the Darc of the Commitrnent, the requirements to obtain coverage for umecorded
liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial inforrmtion as to the seller, the
builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; fully executed Indemnity agreements
satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of
the aforesaid inforrmtion by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or rnaterial for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROYIDE AT{Y
OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN. I]NLESS TIIE ABOVE COI{DITIONS ARE FT]LLY
SATISFIED.
Stewart Title of Colorado - Vail Division Flle Number: 6038331
MII{ERAL DISCLOSURE
Order No: 6038331
To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. lG.l1-123, the Company makes the following
disclosure:
(a) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or
otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a
third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energt in
the property; and
(b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission.
NOTE: THIS DISCL(NIJRE APPLIES ONLY IF SCIIEDIJLE B' SECTION 2 OF TIIE
TITLE COMMITMENT IIER.EIN INCLUDES AN EXCEPTION F1OR SEVERED
MINERALS.
St€wa.rt Title of Colomdo - Vail Dvision File Number: 6038331
Mineral Disclosure
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V of the Gramm-t each-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or
through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal infonnation about you with a nonaffiliated third
party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the
type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be
disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of
the privacy policies and practices of Stewart Title Guaranty Company and Stewart Title of Colorado
- Vail Division.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
. Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms.. Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others.
. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent
or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an arnended hivacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic
personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers
to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as p€rmitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers non affiliated companies
that perform services on our behalf.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE AI.IY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH
ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY I-AW.
We restrict access to nonpublic penonal information about you to those employees who need to know
that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and
procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
Some states give you the right to access and correct nonpublic personal information. You may contact us
in writing at out Home Office, if your state law gives you this right.
Pcviccd 6/O5
2.
3.
4.
CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
(a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instnrment. (b) "Public Records"
means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting your title - according to the
state statutes where your land is located.
LATER.DEFECTS
The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section lI may be amended to show any defects, liens or
encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between
the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B -
Section I are met. We shall have no liability to vou because of this amendment.
EXISTINGDEFECTS
If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we
may amend Schedule B to shown them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or
encumbrances, we shall be liabte to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this
information and did not tell us about it in writing.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Our only obligation is to issue to you the policy refened to in this Commitment when you have met
its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this
Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this
Commitment when you acted in good faith to:
Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I.
or
Eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section II.
We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment
and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you.
5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMII{ITMENT
Any clai4 whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title
to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms.
Order Number: 603&i31
2 of 2 Commihnent - 235 W,/O Dsclcurc
W on comments I sent last 1
From: Pam Hopkins <phopkins@vail.net>
To: Warren Campbell <WCampbell@vailgov.com>
Date: 041192007 6:13:24PMSubject Re: How are we coming on addressing my comments I sent last week?
Hi Wanen,
The easiest for us is to take the stove out and make a nicer wet bar, with a
smaller refrigerator. We will also take the island out.
I will be back on Monday April 30. Hopefully by then we will have solved the
TOV FD issues and we can submit for a building permit. And have DRB
approval.
Thanks for lour help,
Pam
On 4l19lo7 4:36 PM, '\A/arren Campbell" <WCampbell@vailgov.com> wrote:
> I sent this last Thursday.
> Pam.
> I am performing my review and will send you any comments I generate. I
> knorv the Fire Department is doing their reviewing as I spoke to them
> yesterday. I believe JR Rulapaugh may have contacled you already with
> several questions.
> Public Works and I are having a major problem with the construction of
> a second dwelling unit on the property. The proposal to build a full
> kitchen really affects your parking demands and circulation in the
> driveway. Because you are proposing a second dwelling unit you must
> identiff that you can meet the required parking for each unit.
> Primary Unit is required - 4 spaces required (5,459 s.f.)
> Secondary unit is required - 2 spaces required (1,118 s.f.)
> The required parking for each unit cannot block the required parking
> for the other unit.
> The fact that the proposed garage is internally connected to be one
> large garage means that the three cars in there go to the primary unit.
> I see the only possible solution to being able to meel your parking
> reguirement as putting in a separation wall in the garage to create a
> one car garage for the secondary unit with its second parking space
> being located right behind the garage door. This will obviously mean
> you can't use a two car sized garage door. This design would allow for
> each side of the duplex to have half its required parking located within
> the garages and the other half located directly behind the garage doors.
> This is just my suggestion. You may have another solution.
> Please show turning movements on the revised site plan to demonstrate
> compliance with the parking requirements.
> Please only submit those pages which pu revise to meet the parking
> requirement.
> | will be out of Town till next Thursday. I still intend to staff
> apprve lour application as long as compliance withthe parking standardq
> can be met.
> Regards
> Warren
>>>> Pam Hopkins <phopkins@vail.neF 04/19/2007 4:31 PM >>>
> | did not reiceive them. I have looked in deleted, received and junk
> and the
> last email from 1ou, besides today is April 3.
> On 4l19lo7 4:20 PM, 'Warren Campbell" <WCampbell@vailgov.com> wrote:
>> Did you get myemail? lfonvarded the email lsent lastThursday.
>>>>> Pam Hopkins <phopkins@vail.net> 04/19/2007 1 1 :35 AM >>>
>> Welcome back.
>> I did not see your comments. Where?
>> Pam
>> | am leaving tomonow for a week. lf you could get them to me today,
>> it
>> vrould be great Thanks
>> On 4l19lO7 10:17 AM, 'Warren Campbell" <WCampbell@vailgov.com>
> wrote:
>>> Pam,
>>> | am back in the office and just wanted to check on your progress
>>with
>>> addressing my commenls. Let me know if I can help in away.
>>> Thanks
>>> Warren
>> Pamela W. Hopkins, AIA
>> Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, PC
>> PO Box 3340
>> Vail, CO 81658
>>970.476.2201
>> 970.476.7491 lax
>> Pam@SnowdonHopkins.com
> Pamela W. Hopkins, AIA
> Snowdon and Hopkins Archilests, PC
> PO Box 3340
> Vail, CO 81658
> 970.476.2201
>970.476.7491 lax
> Pam@SrowdonHopkins.com
Pamela W. Hopkins, AIA
Snowdon and Hopkins Architests, PC
PO Box 3340
Vail, CO 81658
970.476.2201
970.476.7491tax
l%m@Snol.donHopkins.com
GC:Tara Parks <tara@boulderarchitect.us>
fr+'|Won,l*>1
Planning and Environmental Commi$on
ACTIOI{ FORlrl
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road. Vail, cololado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fdx:,919.479,2452.
web: www,vailgov.comoo*tntw cEvElcEl{t
Proiect Name: Cerisola Exemption Plat
Project Description:
PEC Number: PE@70008
Request for an amended final plat for Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. The exemption
plat exchanged equal sized parcels of land between the two lots to facilitate a new addition and
retaining wall.
Participants:
OWNER LARCH, S.A.
c/o cERIsor-A
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 81657
0L12912007
APPUCANT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHTE01/29/2007 Phone: 970-476-220L
PO BOX 33,+0
VAIL
co 81658
Ucense: C000001763
ARCHITECT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHIIE01/29/2007 Phonq 970-47 6-270L
PO BOX 3340
VAIL
co 81658
License: @00001763
ProjectAddress: 805 POTATO PATCH DRVAIL Location: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
Legal Description: Lot: 29 Block 1 Subdivision: VAIL POTATO PATCH
Parcel Number: 2101-063-0101-9
Comments: See@nditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vob:
Conditions:
Kjesbo
Jewitt
5-0-0
Action: APPROVED
Date of Apprcvalz 0312612Q07
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Cond: 113
All darelopment applications submitted to the Town after the effective date of
Ordinance 26, Series 2005 shall be subject to the pending employee housing
regulations in whatever form they are finally adopted; provided, however, that if
the Town fails to adopt the pending employee housing regulations by April 15,2007,
this Ordinance shall not apply to such development applicaUons.
@nd: CON0008798
The applicant and his successors and assigns, shall not be permitted to request any
varianes subsequent to the apprwal of this amended final plat for Lots 29 and 30,
Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, on the basis that the resulting approved plat created a
physical hardship for developing these lots.
Planner: Warren Campbell PEC Fee Paidr $650.00
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
March 26,2007
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 12-
12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
modification to shared property boundaries, Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail
Potato Patch, located at 805 and 807 Potato Patch Drive, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0008)
Applicant Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and
Hopkins Architects, P.C.Planner: Wanen Campbell
il.
SUMMARY
The applicant, Pedro Cerisola, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, are
requesting approval of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12, Exemption
Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification to shared
property boundaries, Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, located at 805 and
807 Potato Patch Drive. The purpose of the proposed plat is to reconfigure the
shared property line between Lots 29 and 30 to facilitate a garage and residential
addition to the west side of the existing residence on Lot 29. The proposed final plat
results in the exchange of equal sized portions from each lot to the other lot resulting
in no change in overall size to either lot. The area to be exchanged measures
approximately 1,086 square feet. Staff is recommending approval, with a
condition, of this application subject to the findings and criteria outlined in Section
Vlll of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicants, Pedro Cerisola, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects,
are requesting to modify the shared property line between Lots 29 and 30. The
purpose of the proposed plat is to reconfigure the shared property line between Lots
29 and 30 to facilitate a garage and residential addition to the west side of the
existing residence on Lot 29. The proposed reconfiguration of the shared lot line
resufts in Lot 29 maintaining its size of 23,422 square feet and Lot 30 maintaining its
size of 17,730 square feet. lf this application is approved, the applicant will be
submifting a design review application for an addition to the existing residence on Lot
29.
A vicinity map is attached depicting the subject property (Attachment A), as is a
reduced copy of the proposed plat (Aftachment B).
III. BACKGROUND
Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, were annexed into the Town by
Ordinance 8, Series of 1969, which became effective on August 23, 1969.
The existing structure on Lot 29 was approved by the Design Review Board on June
6, 1990. There have been no applications to perform any work on this lot since
construction of the home. Lot 30 is currently vacant.
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BOARDS
Plannino and Environmental Commission:
Action: Pursuant to Section 13-12-3C, Review and Action on Plat, Vail Town Cod,
the Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval,
approval with modifications, or denial of the final plat.
Desiqn Review Board:
Action: The Design Review Board has no review authority on an exemption plat, but
must review any accompanying Design Review Board application.
Town Council:
The Town Council is the appeals authority for an exemption plat review procedure in
accordance with Sub-section 13-3-5C, Council May Appeal, Vail Town Code.
Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and
plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff
also adMses the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a
staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a
recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also
facilitates the review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
TITLE 13, VAIL TOWN CODE: SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (partial)
13-2-2 DEFINITIONS
DGMPTION PIAT: The platting of a portion of land or property that does not fall
within the definition of a "subdivision", as contained in this section.
13-12 EXEMPTION PLAT REVIEW PROCEDURES
13-12-1: PURPOSE AND INTENT:
The purpose of this chapter is to establish criteria and an appropriate review process
whereby the planning and environmental commission may grant exemptions from the
definition of the term 'subdivision" for properties that are determined to fall outside
vt.
the purpose, puruiew and intent of chapters 3 and 4 of this title. This process rc
intended to allow for the plafting of property where no additional parcels are created
and conformance with applicable provisions of this code has been demonstrated.
13-12-2: EXEMPTIONS lN PROCEDURE AND SUBMITTALS:
'Exemption P/ats', as defined in section 13-2-2 of this title, shall be exempt from
requirements related to preliminary plan procedures and submittals. Exemption plat
applicants may be required to submit an environmental impact repoft if required by
title 12, chapter 12 of this code.
13-12-3: PLAT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA FOR REVIEW:
C. Review And Action On Plat: The planning and environmental commission shall
review the plat and associated materials and shall approve, approve with
modifications or disapprove the plat within twenty one (21) days of the first public
hearing on the exemption plat application or the exemption plat application will be
deemed approved. A longer time period for rendering a decision may be granted
subject to mutual agreement between the planning and environmental commission
and the applicant. The criteia fw reviewing the plat shall be as contained in section
13-3-4 of thistitle.
SURROUNDING LAND USES ANDZONING
vil.SITE ANALYSIS
The following is a zoning analysis of Lots 29 and 30, which are proposed to be
amended by the proposed application. The purpose of this analysis is to provide a
comparison of the existing lots to the proposed lots.
Lot 29, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch
Zoning:Primary/Secondary District
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
North:
East:
West:
South:
Current Land Use:
Develooment Standard
Lot Area:
Dimension:
Frontage:
GRFA:
Land Use
Residential
Open Space
Residential
Open Space
Zoninq
Primary/Secondary District
Outdoor Recreation District
Primary/Secondary District
Outdoor Recreation District
Single Family Residence
Allowed Existinq Proposed
15,000 s.f. 23,422s.t. 23,422 s.f. (no change)
80'X80'min. 100'X100' 130X130'
30ft. min. 147.22ft. 195.73ft. (+48.51ft.)
7,596 s.f. 7,596 s.f. (no change)
Access:The access is taken off of Potato Patch Drive.
Lot 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch
Zoning:Primary/Secondary
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Cunent Land Use: Vacant
Develooment Standard Allowed Existinq
Lot Area: 15,000 s.f. 1 7,730 s.f.
Dimension:
Frontage:
GRFA:
Access:
Lot
Lot24
Lot 25
Lot 26
Lot27
Lot 28
Lot 31
Lot 32
Lot Size
21,213 s.l.
17,598 s.f.
19,210 s.f.
21,649 s.f.
22,477 s.f.
20,473 s.I.
31,581 s.f.
GRFA
7,307 s.f.
6,837 s.f.
7,O47 s.t.
7,364 s.f
7,472 s.f.
7,211s.f.
8,544 s,f.
80X80'min. 90'X90'
30ft. min. 118.24ft.
Proposed
17,730 s.f. (no change)
90'x90'
69.73 ft. (-48.51 ft.)
6,853 s.f. (no change)6,853 s.f.
The access is taken off of Vail Potato Patch.
Comoarison of Prooosed Lots 29 and 30 to a selection of other lots in the immediate vicinitv
within the Vail Potato Patch Subdivision
Zonino
Primary/Secondary
Primary/Secondary
Primary/Secondary
Primary/Secondary
Primary/Secondary
Primary/Secondary
Primary/Secondary
VIII. APPLICATIONCRITERIAANDFINDINGS
The purpose section of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, is intended to ensure that
the proposed subdivision is promoting the health, safety and welfare of the
community. The criteria for reviewing an exemption plat shall be as contained in
section 13-3-4 of this title which are as follows:
(1) The extent to which the proposed subdivision ls consisfent with all the
applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in
the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development
objectives of the town; and
Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat and found it to
be in compliance with all applicable elements of Vail Comprehensive Plan.
The exchange of equal sized parcels of land, which maintains the size of
each lot does not have any impact to the goals, objectives, or policies of the
Vail Comprehensive Plan.
(2) The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the
standards of this Title, as well as, but not limited to, Title 12, Zoning
Regulations and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and
Environmental Commission deems appl icable ; and
Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat and found that
all submittal documents were received and the resulting lots will comply with
all applicable portions of the Town of Vail Zoning Code.
(3) The extent to which the proposed subdivision presenls a harmonious,
convenient, workable relationship among /and uses cong.sfenf with municipal
development objectives; and
Staff Response: The proposed final plat modifying the shared property line
between Lots 29 and 30 will not negatively affect the workable relationship
among land uses as the proposal will maintain the cunent. land uses, low
density residential.
(4) The extent of the effects on the future development of the surounding
area; and
Staff Response: The proposed final plat modifying the shared property line
between Lots 29 and 30 will not negatively affect the future development of
the surrounding area as the development potential remains consistent such
as lot size and gross residential floor area.
(5) The ertent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed to
avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of
public seruices, or require duplication or premature extension of public
facilities, or resuft in a'leapfrog'pattern of development; and
Staff Response: The proposed final plat modifying the shared property line
between Lots 29 and 30 will not negatively affect the elements identified in
the above criterion.
(6) The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serue the planned
ultimate population of the seruice area to avoid future land disruption to
upgrade under-sized lines; and
Staff Response: The proposed final plat modifying the shared property line
between Lots 29 and 30 will not affect the cunently level of utility service
required in the vicinity.
(7) The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of
an orderly viable community and serves the best rnferesfs of the community
as awhole; and
Staff Response: Staff believes the proposed final plat to modify the shared
property line between Lots 29 and 30 will continue to allow for the orderly
growth of the community and seryes the interests of the community as the
owner of the lots will be able to modify the existing driveway to allow for an
expanded garage and residential additional without the need for variances to
encroach into a side setback.
tx.
(8) The extent to which the proposed subdivision resu/fs in adverse or
beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to,
water quality, air qualtty, noise, vegetation, riparian conidors, hillsides and
other desirable natural features; and
Staff Response: Staff does not believe that the proposed final plat to modify
the shared property line between Lots 29 and 30 will result in any adverse
impacts to any of the items listed in the above criterion.
(9) Such other factors and criteria as the Commission and/or Council deem
applicable to the proposed subdivision.
B, Necessary Findings: Before recommending and/or granting an approval of an
application for a major subdivision, the Planning and Environmental Commission
shall make the following findings with respect to the proposed major subdivision:
(1) That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in Subsecflon
13-3-44, Vail Town Code; and
(2) That the subdivision is conslsfenf with the adopted goals, objectives and
policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive PIan and compatible with the
development objectives of the Town; and
(3) That the subdivision is compatibte with and suitabte to adjacent uses and
appropriate for the sunounding areas; and
(4) That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious
development of the Town in a manner that conserues and enhances its
natural environment and its established character as a resort and
residential community of the highest quality.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and
Environmental Commission apploves, with a condition, an amended final plat
pursuant to Chapter 1&12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a modification to shared property boundaries, Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail
Potato Patch, located at 805 and 807 Potato Patch Drive, subject to the following
condition:
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the
amended final plat, the Gommunity Development Department recommends the
Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with a condition,
the applicant's reguesf for a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12, Exemption
Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification to shared
property boundaries, Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, located at
805 and 807 Potato Patch Drive, and setting forth details in regard thereto."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the
amended final plat, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission pass the following condition:
1) The applicant and his successors and assigns, shall not be permitted to
request any variances subsequent to the approval of this amended final
platfor Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, on the basis thatthe
resulting approved plat created a physical hardship for developing these
lots.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the
amended final plat, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission makes the following findings:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
(1) That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in SuFsecfibn
13-3-44, Vail Town Code; and
(2) That the subdivision ls cons.sfent with the adopted goals, objectives and
policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the
development objectives of the Town; and
(3) That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and
appropriate fq the sunounding areas; and
(4) That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious
development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its
natural environment and its established character as a resort and
residential community of the highest quality.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Copyof the proposed final plat
C. Public Notice
Attachment A
+e
{
o
tro
E
()o
I
I
ri
i:i.
3'
E€rl5
3
rl
illlr
il5t lr
E IEt165li
!ri
idl
!dlt1lill5lllat Ittl
stl:ll
Fl<
3qFdr
II
I
lHft$ffi1
I
i
1
!
iI
I
I
It
EtiEiEI
art:
5r
!i
F
I
"l8l
s t!:lc I
zllegi! rrld Isl: I
5 lr IitI Iatl II'! |tiii :gi::
I
igi!JEi:it
,Eri
l:
€ ltrldllrltl
:ti.!tlrll$;l I-l1 i-l | |I I lF I IIlEjl l"llltl *tIt:il i;I t:il ;!
J r Alll !F
EE:IIFiI
<Y
F.o
B{
II
ii
i::
I
I
luli
hl
Itl
i,tl
lt{
9.{
E FIF:lt:lI Pt!;;l3si Itlsii i ;:
lII l:; E
il
U' E.i5
ii
tit
E.F
b tq!
'i Eg;
iE3
v
it
ig
rl
^I
EFE
Ef93rdF
a
$$iilil
t-
r lE
eli
l11rl;
!t;' lt!li
ttl
$;t Ir :rl I
Tt !dt II llil L
I l;tl i;I t:il ;r
EEllliii
I
.hRS-- dl
ti!!:*
t
(-)
< -F
' !8.- . lEssBq!;: i!!!3*
-E\
I ia8
;BBee
EEiEi,
EEIEI :
EEEiE-i
HEE!FHE
7
o
iirii,ifiiiiii;ii
iffii$ruffi$Lli
E
'Ea:.i
f,s
/-.
?-
o.*
,ltlll
!lrl
$6a
5t
€81 El
ii ti
!i: f:!i !l
-t -t
i? e
4.
l3
I
r
Ii
i
iti' ir i
#iii,in;
si
=i
5i<tiui
;;ET:II:
Itil
iii:l
iiii;
Eiit;:rlll
t siilEX E il.,:lE3 EIiir:oFloc)
h
frl
F..
E-la
Fl
LE]
h
E-tz
()
j
zF
F
Mt)
FJ
Z
n)
V)F
Fl
h
z
V)
F-{
(n
){O
E-{
H.{
F
F
l+l
Fl
F{
F:
z
FT
frl
zfrl
=
e
ZtsI :l
E Ee
x *-ue 6-
: 's9: Ed
6FCe-:dF
Ag
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town
Code on February 26, 2007, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposed major
amendment to Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, pursuant to Article 12-
9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in the
number of dwelling units from 69 units to 75 units; located at 141 and 143 Meadow
Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PECo7-0004)
Applicant: Crossroads East One, LLC and Crossroads West One, LLC, represented
by Mauriello Planning Group, LLCPlanner: Warren Campbell
A request for conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses,
Vail Town Code, to allow for multiple-family dwellings and lodges and private club
(parking club); located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing
1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0005)
Applicant: Crossroads East One, LLC and Crossroads West One, LLC, represented
by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Wanen Campbell
A request for a final review of a major amendment to the Approved Development Plan
pursuant to Section 12-8E-18 (B) Major Amendments, to allow for a revised grading plan
at Vail's Front Door Vista Bahn Ski Yard, located at 151 Vail Lane/Lot A, Block 5C, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0006)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Corp.Planner: George Ruther
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 12-12, tuVP
Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification to fli1.4
shared propertyboundaries, Lots2gand 30, Block 1, VailPotato Patch, located at805l6[-
and 807 Potato Patch Drive, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0008) 'rrApplicant: Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and Hopkins
Architects, P.C.Planner: Wanen Campbell
A request for a final review of a variance from Section '14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, to allow for a retaining wall in excess
of three feet within the front setback, located at 805 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1,
Vail Potato Patch, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0007)
Page 1
ir; t'.. {r -
' i }..''' I';r{'it:-
Applicant: Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and Hopkins' Architects, P.C.
Planner: Warren Campbell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to aftend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please
call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published February 9,2007, in the Vail Daily.
t"''
Page 2
Applicant: Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and Hopkins' Architects, P.C.
Planner: Wanen Campbell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call 97 0 -47 9-2 1 38 for ad d itiona I i nformation.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please
call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published February 9,2007, in the Vail Daily.
Attachment C
Page 2
'1- l
t'li,i
Subdivision Review
Appl for Review bY the
nnmg a Environ mental Commission
of CommunitY Development
Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
Cn,ZtZe faxl. 97O.479.2452
www.vailgov.com
r"5
-Depal
75 South
tel: I
General Information:
AllprojectsrequiringPlanningandEnvlronmentalcommissionrevie\wmustreceiveapprovalpriorbsubmittinga
buitdins permit appticauon. d1ffi il:;iJ'ffiil;tt i;A;l'*ens tor.the Pardrular-apProval that is requested'
An application for ptanning ..0 Eir*nrinmt commissioniEte",, annot be accepted until all required informauon
is received by the commun',y-il;til;;f oep"rtment. ih"'*r"t mav also need to be revlewed bv the Town
Council and/or the Design Review Board'
Type of ApPlication and Fee:
frifil
w
3
o
ooD
D
tr
)(n-
E]
tr
tr
tr
Rezoning $1300
Major Srlbdivislon $1500
Minor Subdivision $650
ExempUon Plat $650
MinoiAmendmenttoanSDD $1000
New Speciat Development District $6000
Maior Amendment to an SDD $6000
Major Amendment to an SDD $1250
ho exbrior ndifr@fidns)
tr Conditional Use Permit $650
A ift"opf.i. uodifiotion $400
a iai..r:ex.tior Alteration $619
E i'i;j;; d;oi meration $8oo
E oeietopment Ptan $1500
E nrl-t'a'^.tnt to a Development Plan $250
fr 2".i.s Cod. Amendment $1190
E variance $500- sign variance $2oo
41Descriptlon of tlre Request:
LocaHon of the ProPosal: Lot:
Physical Address:
Parcel I
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Address:
Owner(s)
Name of APPlicant:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no')
E-mail Address:
****a****+*t+**+*******************+**************************+*f**f******+t*************+++
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement
Statement Nudber: R0?0000095 Anount: $550.00 Ot/29/2O07o2:56 PM
Palment Method: Check
IIOPKINS ARCHITECTS
Init : 'JSNotation: 780/SNOWDON
Permit No: PEC070008 Tl4)e: PEC - Minor Subdivieion
Parcel No: 2101- 063 - 0101- 9
Site AddreEg: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIIJ
Location: 805 PO:IATO PATCH DR.
Total Fees: $550.00This Pal,'ment: $650.00 Total AI.',IJ Pmtss: $550.00 ?
Balance: $0.00*****+{!+******+***************+*+******t+a*****lll******i'}***********{'ta'+*+++++*********++{'la'
ACCOI,]NT ITEM LIST:
Account Code DeecriDtion current Pmta
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPI,TCATION FEES 550.00
January 29,2007
Town of Vail PEC
Application for a Minor Subdivision Review
Lots 29 and 30. Block 1, Vail Potato Patch
Sirs,
The owner of lots 29 and 30' Pedro Cerisola, is requesting a minor subdivision approval so that
he may enlarge Lot 29 by 1 1 67 square feet for his existing 3 story residence in which he has
lived for l7 years. He is planning to add an elevator in the existing garage, enlarge the existing
garage to park 3 cars and add a one bedroom apartment below. The additional land will be used
to extend the existing retaining wall and driveway and the garage and apartment expansion.
We are planning a new residence for Lot 30. The new property line does not affect the
development of Lot 30.
Please contact me ifyouhave any questions,
Sincerelv.
Q,,Cutu lpt^<
Pamela W. Hopkins. AIA
Principal
PO Box 3340 . Vail, Colorado 81658 . 970-476-2201 . 970-476-7491(F) o Snowdonllopkins.com
January 29,2007
Town of Vail PEC
RE: lot 29 and30, Block l, Vail Potato Patch
Adj oining property owners :
TRACT A: Town of Vail, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657
Lot 5 and 6: Diane J. Boyer, PO Box 456,Yai, CO 81658
PO Box 3340. Vail, Colorado 81658 .970-476-2201 .970-476-7491(F). Snowdonflopkins.com
American tand Title Association Commitment - 1982
TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT
BY
,stewartI ) title guaranty company
Order Number: 6038331
We agree to issue policy to you according to the terms of the Commitment. When lve sholv the policy amount and
your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date
shorvn in Schedule A.
lf lhe Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met rvithin six months after the Commitment Date, our
obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment rvill end when the Policy is
issued and then our obligation to you rvill be under the Policy.
Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the follolving:
The Provisions in Schedule A.
The Requirements in Schedule B-I.
The Exceptions in Schedule B-ll.
The Conditions on Pase 2.
This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections I and II of SCHEDULE B.
THIS COMMITMf,NT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, EXAMINATION, REPORT OR REPRN,SENTATION OF FACT OR
TITLE AND DOES NOT CREATE AND SHALL NOT BE THE BASIS OF ANY CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE,
NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION OR OTHER TORT CLAIM OR ACTION. THE SOLE LIABILITY OF
COMPANY AND ITS TITLE INSURANCE AGENT SHALL ARISE UNDER AND BE GOVERNED BY PARAGRAPH
4 OF THE CONDITIONS,
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Titte Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
affixed bv its dulv authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A.
stewart
Countersigned:
Stervart'f itle of Colorado - Vail Division
97 lvlain St., Suite W-201
Edwards, CO 81632
OrderNumber: 6038331
I of 2 Commitment - 235 WO Disclosurc
tf'i,1T."\tti. rsos.€Ilt*rf
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1. Effective Date: November 2'7.2006 at 8;00 a.m.
2. Policv or Policies To Be Issued:
Order No.: 6038331
Amount of Insurance
(a) A.L.T.A. Owner's
Proposed Insured:
TO BE DETERMINED
(b) A.L.T.A. Loan
(Standard)
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
Fee Simple
4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in:
l-ot29:
LARCH. S.A.. A PANAMANIAN CORPORATION
t-ot 30:
CALUMET HOLDINGS. S.A.. A PANAMANIAN CORPORATION
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
LOTS 29 and 30,
BLOCK I,
VAIL/POTATO PATCH,
According to the plat recorded March 5, 1974 in Book 233 at Page 629 as Reception No. 129527.
COUNTY OF EAGLE
STATE OFCOLORADO.
Purported Address: STATEMENTOFCHARGES
807 Potato PatCh Drive These charges are due and payable
vail, cotorado g 1657 before a Policy can be issued:
PREMIUM:
Mortgage: $100.00
STEWART TITLE
G UARANTY COMPANY Commitment - Schedule A
Paee I of I
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULEB-Section I
REQUIREMENTS
Order Number: 6038331
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
l. Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed
for record, to wit:
3. This report is for informational purposes only. No policy will be issued.
STEWART TITLE
GUARANry COMPANY
Commitment - Schedule B I
Page I of I
Order Number: 6038331
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULEB-Section2
EXCEPTIONS
Order Number: 6038331
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to
the satisfaction of the Company:
' L Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any facts, which a
correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose, and which are not shown by the public
records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
laws and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
commitment.
6. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance
thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
7. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales.
8. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation
or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area.
9. Reservations or exceptions in Patents, or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, including the
reservation of a right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as
reserved in United States Patent recorded August 15, 1935 in Book 93 atPage278.
10. Restrictive Covenants recorded March 5, 1974 in Book 233 at Page 628 as Reception No. 129526 and
as amended in instrument recorded September 24, 1915 in Book 241 atPage 950 as Reception No.
138069.
11. All matters shown on the platof Vail/Potato Patch, recorded in Book 233 atPage 629 as Reception
No. 129527.
12. Easement Deed dated August 6, I 98 I recorded at Book 327 , Page 614 as Reception No. 2239'7 6.
(Ihe above items affect both L,ots 29 and 30)
STEWART TITLE
G UARANTY COMPANY
Conrmitn]ent- Schedule B 2
Paee I of 2
Order Number: 60-1833 |
13. A Deed of Trust dated February I8, 1992, executed by S.A. larch, a Panamanian Corporation, to the
Public Trustee of Eagle County, to secure an indebtedness of $4O0,000.00 in favor of California
Commerce Bank recorded December 28, 1993 in Book 628 atPage 668 as Reception No. 52/1729.
14. A Deed of Trust dated Novemberg, l999,executed by larch, S.A., a Panamanian Corporation, to the
Public Trustee of Eagle County, to secure an indebtedness of $1,000,000.00 in favor of California
Commerce Bank recorded December 28, 1999 as Reception No. 718fti2.
(The above items affect Lot29)
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Commitment - Schedule B 2
Page2 of 2
Order Nrmber: 603S3 |
DISCLOSURES
Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
A. THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIALTAXING DISTR]CT;
A CERTIF]CATE OFTAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED
FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT;
INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER, ORTHE COUNTY ASSESSOR
NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity
shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording rvhenever the title
entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the
transaction which was closed." Provided that Stervart Title of Colorado - Vail Division conducts the closing of
the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception
number 5 will not appear on the Orvner's Title Policy and the Lender's Title Policy when issued'
NOTE: Affirmative Mechanic's Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception No.
4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the
following conditions:
A. The land described in Schedute A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the
land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled Mechanic's
and Materialmen's Liens.
D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased,
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded
liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the
builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; fully executed Indemnity agreements
satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of
the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ANY
OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN, UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY
SATISFIED.
Stewart Title of (lolorado - Vail Division Filc Number: 6038331
Disclosurcs
B.
C.
MINERAL DISCLOSURE
Order No: 6038331
To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following
disclosure:
(a) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or
otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and thatthere is a substantial likelihood that a
third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in
the property; and
(b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission.
NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIES ONLY IF SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THE
TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLUDES AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED
MINERALS.
Stcwart'fi c of Colorado - Vail Division File Number: 6038331
Mineral Disclosur€
Rev. 07/2001
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V of the Gramm-trach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or
through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third
party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the
type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be
disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, rvhich notifies you of
the privacy policies and practices of Stewart Title Guaranty Company and Stewart Title <lf Coklrado
- Vail Division.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others.
lnformation we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent
or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic
personal lnformation will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers
to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers non affiliated companies
that perform services on our behalf.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH
ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSETHAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees rvho need to know
that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and
procedural safeguards that comply rvith federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
Some states give you the right to access and correct nonpublic personal information. You may contact us
in writing at out Home Office, if your state larv gives you this right.
Revised 6/05
.,
3.
4.
CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
(a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. (b) "Public Records"
means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting your title - according to the
state statutes where vour land is located.
LATER DEFECTS
The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section Il may be amended to show any defects, liens or
encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between
the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B -
Section I are met. We shall have no liabilitv to you because of this amendment.
EXISTING DEFECTS
If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we
may amend Schedule B to shown them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or
encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 belorv unless you knew of this
information and did not tell us about it in writins.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Our only obligation is to issue to you the policy referred to in this Commitment when you have met
its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this
Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this
Commitment when you acted in good faith to:
Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I.
or
Eliminate with our rvritten consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section IL
We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shorvn in Schedule A of this Commitment
and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you.
5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title
to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms.
Order Number: 6038331
2 of 2 Commitment - 235 WO Disclosure
Status:
J Approved
Courtruuw DEvELopMENT Rounne Fonnn
I Approved with conditions fi Denied
Routed To:George Chalberg, PW
Date Routed:01t30t07
Routed By:Warren Campbell
Date Due:02t07t07
Description of work:Proposed replat of shared property line between two exisitng lots
Address:805 and 807 Potato Patch Drive
Legal:Lot:29 and
30
Block:1 Subdivision:Vail Potato Patch
Comments:Date Reviewed:211107
Need additional review bv Fire Department.
Get information on manhole. Find out if it is orivate or Eaole Rivers oer Chad Salli.
TOIIryOF IIA[,
D epafiment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
wwwvailgov.com
February 2,2007
Snowdon and Hopkins Architects
c/o Pam Hopkins
P.O. Box 3340
Vail, CO 81658
Re: Replat of a shared property line between Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch
Ms. Hopkins,
This letter is being sent in response to your Exemption Plat application to adjust the shared property
line between Lots 29 and 30, located at 805 and 807 Potato Patch Drive. Staff has performed a review
and the following are my comments that need to be addressed prior to moving fonvard with scheduling
on a Planning Commission agenda:
r Please amend the title of the plat to read as follows;
Amended FinalPlat
Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch
A Resubdivision of Lots 29 and 30, Block One, Vail Potato Patch
Tor,vn of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado
r Please add a note under the Notes portion of the plat which states clearly the purpose of the
ptat.
. The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District identified a concem regarding a sewer manhole
located just west of the existing driveway on Lot 29. They asked me to have you please call a
Jean Certa at 476-7480 to perform a utility locate on the sewer and identify whether or not it is a
public or private service line. In addition, he will identify whether or not the District needs an
easement over the line. lf an easement is required please show the easement on the proposed
ptat.
Please review these comments and contact me at 970-479-2148 if you have any questions. Please
respond at your earliest convenience to avoid any unnecessary delay. In order to remain on the
February 26h Planning and Environmental Commission agenda please have all the items identified
above sitisfactorily addressed and revisions submitted no laler than February 16h at 5:00 p.m.
Regards, A | .l/\ lt ilil/,'w$.I\twLry
Warren Campbell
Senior Planner
Cc: File
fp NBCYCLED PlPER
P**P'tt^,1*4
ccl,ilrllY (EtElJoFtE r
Planning and Environmental Commisson
ACTTOI{ FORtrl
Department of Community Deyelopment
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 978.479,2452
web: www.vailgov,com
Proie€t Name: Oerisola Retaining Wall Var.
Project Description:
PEG Number: PEC070007
Request to extend an existing retaining wall which exceeds 3 feet in height within the front
setback. The proposed retaining wall is approximately 11 feet tall.
Participants:
OWNER LARCH, S.A,
c/o cERrsoLA
805 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL
co 81657
0t12912007
APPUCANT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHfiE0U29/2007 Phone : 970476-220L
PO BOX 3340
VAIL
co 816s8
License: C000001763
ARCHITECT SNOWDON AND HOPKINS, ARCHm0l/29l2007 Phonet 970-476-22Q1
PO BOX 3340
VAIL
co 81658
License: C000001763
Prcject Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL locauon: 805 POTATO PATCH DR.
Legal Description! Lotr 29 Bloclc 1 Subdivision: VAIL POTATO PATCH
Parcel llumber: 2101-063-0101-9
Comments: SeeConditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Kjesbo
Second By: Jewitt
Vote: 6-0-0
Conditions:
Action: APPROVED
Date of Apprcva[ Q312612007
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate revieh, committee(s),
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Cond: 113
All development applications submitted to the Town after the effective date of
Ordinarre 25, Series 2006 shall be subject to the pending emplope housing
regulations In whaEner brm they are finally adopH; provitled, howwer, that if
tfie Tqm fdils to adopt the pendlrp arpbyee houslng regulatjons by Aptil t5,20/J7,
this Odinane shall not apply to such danelopment applications.
Wanen Campbell PEG Fee Paid: $500.00
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
March26,2007
A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining
Waffs, Vaif Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, to allow for a
retaining wall in excess of three feet within the front setback, located at 805
Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC07-0007)
Applicant Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and
Hopkins Architects, P.C.
Planner: Wanen Campbell
[.
SUMMARY
The applicant, Pedro Cerisola, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, are
requesting approval of a variance from Section 144-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, to allow for a retaining wall in excess of
three feet within the front setback, located at 805 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1,
Vail Potato Patch. The purpose of the requested variance is to allow for the
extension of an existing retaining wall measuring 11 feet in height at its tallest point,
to facilitate a garage and residential addition to the west side of the existing
residence on Lot 29. Staff is recommending approval of this application subject to
the findings and criteria outlined in Section Vlll of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicants, Pedro Cerisola, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects,
are requesting a variance from Section 144-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yanances, to allow for a retaining wall in excess of three
feet within the front setback. The purpose of the requested variance is to allow for
the extension of an existing retaining wall to facilitate a garage and residential
addition to the west side of the existing residence on Lot 29. The existing retaining
wall is 11 feet in height at its tallest some point and was approved by the granting of
a variance by the Planning and Environmental Commission on July 23, 1990. This
proposal would remove approximately 40 feet of existing wall and add approximately
70 feet of retaining wall, which at its tallest point would be 11 feet in height. lf this
application is approved, the applicant will be submifting a design review application
for an addition to the existing residence on Lot 29.
A vicinity map is attached depicting the subject property (Attachment A), as is a
reduced copy of the proposed site plan (Attachment B).
ilt.BACKGROUND
Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, were annexed into the Town by
Ordinance 8, Series of 1969, which became effective on August 23, 1969.
The existing structure on Lot 29 was approved by the Design Review Board on June
6, 1990.
On July 23, 1990, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a variance
to allow for the retaining wall on site to range in height from 3 to 11 feet at a length of
134 feet. The retaining wall was located entirely upon the applicant's property.
There have been no applications to perform any work on this lot since construction of
the home.
ROLES OF REVIEWNG BOARDS
Order of REview: Generally, wriance applications will be reviewed by the Planning
and Environmental Commission, and then any accompanying design review
application will be reviewed by the Design Review Board.
Planning and Environmental Commission:
The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval,
approval with modifications, or denial of a variance application, in accordance with
Chapter 12-17,Yariances, Vail Town Code.
Design Review Board:
The Design Review Board has no review authority over a variance application.
However, the Design Review Board is responsible for the final approval, approval
with modifications, or denial of any accompanying design review application.
Torrrn Council:
The Town Council has the authority to hear and decide appeals from any decision,
determination, or interpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission
and/or Design Review Board. The Town Council may also call up a decision of the
Planning and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board.
Staff:
The Town Staff facilitates the application review process. Staff reviews the
submitted application materials for completeness and general compliance with the
appropriate requirements of the Town Code. Staff also provides the Planning and
Environmental Commission a memorandum containing a description and
background of the application; an evaluation of the application in regard to the
criteria and findings outlined by the Town Code; and a recommendation of approval,
approval with modifications, or denial.
APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS
Chapter'12-17 : Yariances (in part)
tv.
v.
12-17-1: Purpose:
A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or fo /essen such
practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships rnconsrbfenf with the
objectives of this title as would resuft from strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement, variances from ceftain regulations may be granted. A practical
difftculty u unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or
dimensions of a site or the location of existing sfrucfures thereon; from
topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or
from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate
vicinity. Cosf or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance
with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
VI. SURROUNDING I-AND USES AND ZONING
Land Use ZoninqNorth: Residential Primary/Secondary DistrictEast Open Space Outdoor Recreation DistrictWest Residential Primary/Secondary DistrictSouth: Open Space Outdoor Recreation District
VII. SITE ANALYSIS
Legal Description: Lot 29, Block 1, Vail Potato PatchZoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Current Land Use: Single-Family Drvelling
Lot Size: 23,422 sq. ft. (0.537 acres)
Standard Allowed/Required Existino Proposed
Setbacks (min):
Front 20ft. 23ft. no change.Sides 15 ft. 18f1.141ft. 18 ft./ 15 ft.Rear: 15ft. 91ft. 85ft.
Height (max.): 30 ft./33 ft, 33 ft. no change
Density (max): 2 dwellings 1 dwelling no change
GRFA (max): 7,596 sq. ft. 5,459 sq. ft. 6,577 sq.ft.
Site coverage (max.): 4,684 sq. ft. 2,476 sq. ft. 3,124 sq.ft.
VIII. APPLICATIONCRITERIAANDFINDINGS
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12-16, Vail
Town Code.
A. Consideration of Factors Reoardino Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
This proposed extension of an existing retaining wall which exceeds
the maximum allowable height of three feet within the front setback is
2.
associated with a proposed addition to the west side of the existing
structure. As stated previously in this memorandum, the existing
structure was approved on June 6, 1990 and the variance to allow for
the retaining wall associated with this construction was approved on
July23,1990.
lf this variance were to be approved, staff does not believe that other
existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity would be
negatively affected. The elevation of the Potato Patch Drive at 8,625
feet, the elevation of the structure and proposed addition 8,610 feet,
and the location of the structure on the lot combine to screen the
impact of the appearance of the retaining wall from neighboring lots
and from other locations in the vicinity.
The prospoed extension to the retaining wall will be finished with a
stone veneer facing (keystone block), which will match the existing
wall.
The degree to which relief from the stric{ and literal interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to
achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in
the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant
of special privilege.
The topographic conditions on Lot 29 are such that the buildable
area/location of the site is very well defined. Because the average
slope on the site is approximately 50%, access onto the site is
extremely difficult and the designed approved in 1990 was deemed to
be a reasonable solution.
At the time of approving the cunent variance the Planning
Commission and Staff believed that the retaining wall as constructed
currently was necessary to ensure stabilization of the slopes and
Potato Patch Road. Prior to granting the variance for the current
retaining wall options such as using three foot tiered combination
retaining walls were explored. lt was determined through soil
engineering reports and analysis that the types of soils present and
the pressures which would be exerted on the retaining wall by Potato
Patch Drive would be more than a three foot tiered retaining wall
could withstand. lt was determined that the currently constructed
design which has portions of the retaining wall at 11 feet was the best
solution.
The current proposal proposes to continue the current retaining wall
design an additional 70 feet along the front of the property bringing
the total length to approximately 160 feet. The cunent wall is
approximately 134 feet.
The conditions of the topography and soil have not changed since
approval of the variance in 1990 and staff believes that the proposal
allows for the minimum relief necessary from the strict and literal
B.
interpretation of the Gode to allow for the applicant to reasonably
utilize their property.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution
of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities
and utilities, and public safety.
Staff does not believe this proposal will have a significant impact on
the public health, safety or welfare, public facilities, utilities, or light
and air in comparison to existing conditions of the site as there is
currently a retaining wall on site which does not negatively impact this
elements and the proposed extension would not create a situation in
which there would be a negative impact..
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems
applicable to the proposed variance.
The Planninq and Environmental Gommission shall make the followinq
findinqs before orantino a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following
reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do
not apply generally to other properties in the same zone.c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by
the owners of other properties in the same district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and
Environmental Commission approves the request for a final reMew of a variance
from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code,'pursuant to Chapter 12-17,
Variances, to allow for a retaining wall in excess of three feet within the front setback,
located at 805 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1, Vail Potato, and setting forth
details in regards thereto.
!x.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this
variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission pass the following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's
request fu a variance from Section 14-67, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
retaining wall in excess of three feet within the front setback, located at 805
Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1, Vail Potato, and setting for details in
regard thereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this
variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission makds the following findings:
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties c/assifled in the
Two-F am ily Re sid e ntial Di strict.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propefties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. This variance is wananted for the following reasons.'
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to
other propefties in the same district.
c. The stict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
ATTACHMENTS
Vicinity Map
Copy of the proposed site plan
Public Notice
A.
B.
c.
Attachment A
r6rr{lr xvi
IEZ4LfrLB
€99t8 Opsrotoc tFn
ot€s xos o d
oovuoloc'llvn
HSrVd OrVtOd 'L yco]8 '62 Io'I
3CN30|S3U \nOSH33
F
'c d 'sles|lrfcJv. supdoH pue uop/$ous
o
o
E.cor!E
orlBEl*il=.l'
Ellg i 3;lC-l Hffi
,,ii
'l$H,l\1,r'll
l'[\l
*E
f
u
g
I
$
g
3r95
;r
dE
G.l
{E;
;.-i8-
ls.rg:3
!:!i:H 5
r. 3-\Ft'rzs
+?
l\i
EN
;srEu
EEicir
FiEgE,iFilii:;
::$E3$$
\
FrS t
!
- 6 i?l"i,zI E Rl:{i,,
iT*t
!iJ
t\
_)
I
Irriii:,-!:5
., t i
3li$i
PIEIg
*IEF$
,-)
tL
tr
FI
tE
9:
tsa
I
E
i
\\|ltl
I
I
ii
I
I
\
!
I
I
i
!
\
)r
,]
c
a{
o
rl-
\:( ', r\\a k
\31\+
-i--t--
.\l
-
EF I:E I5EltB I;:l:s Ifi\i itsr I
$
$lie
18t2€rt)dj 8e9lg ocaroloo'tF
r@{l 'ttlc lrilgxog od
'c'd 'dpet$.rv. suppol{ pue uop tous
oo\ntoloc'.llv^
HOIVd olvrod 'l xcolE '62 rol
SSNilOlSSU V-lOSlU39
IV-/lt,
=
=luE
-t
F
JJ
=o
=z
3FllrE
oz-a
Rlu
_.r tlJtl
$ll
otlzl
ztl
f,ilru iltrll
ollZTFI
U'Nxllur llollztl<ll
otl
uJ il@il
8tl
E lti
JJf.oz
z
Futto|llooo-oEooz
Fo*
t.Ll
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town
Code on February 26, 2007, at 1100 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposed major
amendment to Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, pursuant to Article 12-
9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in the
number of dwelling units from 69 units to 75 units; located ai 141 and 143 Meadow
Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing '1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC07-0004)
Applicant: Crossroads East One, LLC and Crossroads West One, LLC, represented
by Mauriello Planning Group, LLCPlanner: Warren Campbell
A request for conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-7E4, Conditional Uses,
Vail Town Code, to allow for multiple-family dwellings and lodges and private club
(parking club); located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing. 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0005)
Applicant Crossroads East One, LLC and Crossroads West One, LLC, represented
by Mauriello Planning Group, LLCPlanner: Wanen Campbell
A request for a final review of a major amendment to the Approved Development Plan
pursuant to Section 1 2-8E-18 (B) Major Amendments, to allow for a revised grading plan
atVail's Front DoorVista Bahn SkiYard,located at 151 VailLane/LotA, Block 5C, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0006)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Corp.Planner: George Ruther
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 12-12,
Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification to
shared property boundaries, Lots 29 and 30, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch, located at 805
and 807 Potato Patch Drive, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0008)
Applicant Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and Hopkins
Architects, P.C.Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail -^ii. ^L Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, to allow for a retaining wall in excess (" 14"' -4
-F
of three feet within the front setback, located at 805 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 29, Block 1, 7l ' v-I ! Vail Potato Patch, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0007)
Page 1 Attachment C
\ , -1r .'t 'C
".
, t f.f i.i ' i\.;
Applicant: Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and Hopkins
Architects, P.C.
Planner: Warren Campbell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please
call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published February 9, 2007, in the Vail Daily.
.,:4*
Page 2
Applicant: Pedro Cerisola/Larch S.A., represented by Snowdon and Hopkins
Architects, P.C.Planner: Wanen Campbell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Pfease call 970-479-2138 ior additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please
call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published February 9, 2007, in the Vail Daily.
Page2
t
Variance Application for Review by tl
Planning and Environmental Commiss
DeDarBnent of Community Development
ZS Soutn Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
trlli g7O'479.2L28 faxt 970'479'2452
web: www'vailgov.com
General Information:
All prolects requiring Planning and Environmental commisron review must receive approval prior to srbmiHing a
buitdins permit application. d#; il;;;d. suummar requirements for.tte P-al:l1a.l-aepror/al
that is requested'
An application for planntng ,nOtnu*nt"ntal Commission r|view cannot be accepted until all required information
is reccived by the Commun|ty Deve|opment Department. rn" p.:.c may a|so neeu to ue reviewed by the To,vn
Councri and/or the Design Review Board'
Type of ApPlication and Fee:
Rezoning $1300
t4ajor subdivision $1500
wlrnor Subdivision $650
Eremotion Plat $650
r'-iinor Amendment to an SDD $1000
New Special Development Distrlct $6000
ttaior Amendmentto an SDD $6000
Major Amendmentto an SDD $1250
r no exterior modifrations)
JAN 29
TOWI\ iii
tr
D
C
tr
n
If
n
tr
-dql
no
{ooc
\,
EI
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
Conditional Use Permit
Floodplain Modification
Mlnor Exterior Alteration
Major b<terior Alteration
Development Plan
Amendment to a DeveloPment Plan
Zoning Code Amendment
Varia nce
Sign Variance
$6s0
$400
$6s0
$800
$1500
$250
$1300
$s00
$200
Location of the ProPosall
Physical Address:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Nanre of APPllcant:
Maiting Address:
E-mail Address:
(Contact Eagle Co, Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no')
tg*ff*3%osj'
Page 1 of 6
F tc',1ev\FORMS\Parmits\Planning\PECwariance'ooc
*****++*************+t*****+++++{r+++***************lr**+*******f*********'i***********'}{'*****+
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
+*+*********ff+*+*++++++t++++t*******+*********f*t+*{.*******'}tfittf*****,t**+**ft*+**l*t**{t+*
Staternent. Number: RO?OOOOO92 Amount: $500.00 Ot/29/2OO702:27 Pl4
Palments Method: Check Init: 'fSl{otsatsion: 781,/sNovlDoN &
HOPKINS
Permit, No: P8C07000? Tl4)e: PEC - Variance
Parcel No: 2101- 053 - 0101-9
Site Addrees: 805 POTaTO PATCH DR VAIIJ
Location: 805 POTATO PATCII DR.
Total Fees: S5OO. O0
Thia Palment: $500.00 Total ALIJ Pmt6: $5OO-00. Balance: 50.00
+********'t'|'|**'t*****************++**********t***atl'{'*++***+*+**+**++++**+rf+***r****f**+++**
ACCOI.JNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code DescriDtion CurrenE Prnts
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPIJICATION FEES s00.00
January 29,,2007
Town of Vail PEC
Application for a Variance from the maximum allowable retaining wall height in the front
setback to extend the existing retaining wall
Lot29. Block 1. Vail Potato Patch
SIIS,
We are proposing to extend the existing retaining wall 50 feet to the \,!'est, at an height of l0 feet
to l2 feet above the proposed driveway, and to the south 27 feet at a height of 12 feet sloping to
the south to a height of 3 feet above grade. The average grade of this lot is approximately 50
percent. The maximum grade of the heated driveway is 8 percent. The existing back out of the
garage distance is now 20 feet.
The original 134 foot wall was granted a variance in 1990. The extreme topographic conditions
of this site created a unique development situation with the driveway maximum slope of 8olo
being the guiding design factor. The proposed new back out ofthe garage and turn out distance
is an improved 30 to 35 feet.
The existing residence blocks any view ofthe existing wall from the south and is not seen from
Potato Patch Drive to the north or from the west or east. The proposed garage addition will also
block any views of the extended wall.
We believe that the strict and literal interpretation of the zoning code would be an additional
hardship to an already difficult site. The owners would love to continue to live in their home and
are proposing an elevator to access tJre lower levels. The only place for the elevator was in the
east garage bay This lead to a garage expansion and the driveway and retaining wall expansion.
The apartment evolved out ofthe space created between the garage floor level and the distance
down to grade below.
Please contact me ifyou have any questions.
Sincerelv.
qppfu-n +bpLu,
Pamela W. Hopkins. AIA
Partner
PO Box 3340 . Vail, Colorado 81658 o 970-476-2201 . 970-476-7491(F) o 5nordonflopkins.com
January 29,2007
Town of Vail PEC
RE: lot 29 and 30, Block l, Vail Potato Patch
Adjoining property owners:
TRACT A: Town of Vail, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657
Lot 5 and 6: Diane J. Boyer, PO Box 456,Yail, CO 81658
PO Box 3340. Vail, Colorado 81658.970-476-2201 .970-476-7491(F). Snowdontlopkins.com
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-21 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
Snowdon and Hopkins Architects
c/o Pam Hopkins
P.O. Box 3340
Vail, CO 81658
February 7,2007
Re: Request for a variancefor a retaining wall exceeding the maximum height permissible under theCode/Lots 29, Block 1, Vail potato patch
Ms. Hopkins,
This letter is being sent in response to your variance application to construct a retaining wall in excessof three feet within the front setback. Siaff has performed a review and the following ar6 th" commentsthat need to be addressed prior to moving fonrard with scheduling on a planning Commission alenOa:
' The proposed driveway and turn-around shall be clearly depicted on the site plan.o lhow all the required parking for the unit on the site plan.
' Show a limits of disturbance and erosion control fence on the site plan.r Provide an erosion control fence detail.r The Public Works Department believes that it is possible to bench the proposed additionalretaining wall to co,me i1!o greater compliance witfr the Title 14, Design Siandaros, Vail TownCode. Options for benching the retaining wall should be explored and shared with staff. lt maynot be possible to meet the three fool maximum height requirement for retaining watts witnin tnefront setback, however, a combination retaining wall, may have more likelihood of a staffrecommendation for approval.r All retaining walls will need to.be designed to support the road above.
Please review these comments and contact me at 970-479-2148 if you have any questions. please
respond at ypur earliest convenience to avoid any unnecessary oelay. In order to remain on theFebruary 26tr Planning and Environmental Commiision agenda please have all the items identifledabove satisfactorily addressed and revisions submitted no la-ter ttran reoruary r Ofr "i s,oo p.;. --'
Regards,
/\ l) A nrt
trja*r-. l,)'^M
Warren Campbell I
Senior Planner
Cc: File
{S "tctc"eoe*o
Status:
I Approved
Conttuunffy DEVELopMENT Rounnc Fonm
I Approved with conditions fi Denied
Routed To:George Chalbero, PW
Date Routed:01t30t07
Routed By:Wanen Campbell
Date Due:02t07t07
Description of work:Variance request to extend existing retaining wall which exceeds 6 feet
in height
Address:805 Potato Patch Drive
Legal:Lot: | 29 | Block: | 1 lSubdivision: lVailPotatoPatch
Comments:Date Reviewed:
Need additional review bv Fire
Provide a title
Show and turnaround.
Show reouired
Show limits of disturbance fence.
Provide an erosion control detail. rock fence.
Wall can be benched. No walls over 6'. Proposed wall must be designed to hold the road
above.
More comments with revisions.
MARCH 7,2007
CERISOLA RESIDENCE
LOT 29, BLOCK 1, VAILiPOTATO PATCH
TOWN OF VAIL
LOT 29: 23,422 SQUARE FEET
ZONING: TWO FAMILY PRIMARY/SECONDARY
AI,LOWABLE GRFA:
.46 < 10,000 SF : 4,600 SF
.38 > 10,000- 15,000 SF: l'900 SF
.13 > 15,000-23,4225F -- 1094.86 SF
TOTAL ALLOWABLE GRFA: 7594'86 SQUARE FEET
SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS:
MAIN LEVEL: EXISTING
MASTERBEDROOMLEVEL: EXISTING
FAMILY ROOM LEVEL: EXISTING
2076 SF
2427 SF
956 SF
PROPOSED 156 SI.'
PROPOSED 659 SF
PROPOSED 303 SF
5.,151
TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GR-FA IS 6577 SF
GT\RAGE FOR THREE CARS IS 887 SF
SI I'E COVERAGE <20% EXISTING 2476 SF + PROPOSED 648 SF
TOTAL SITE COVERAGE :3124 SF = l3'3%
6/
l,l I
51'l
PoBox3]40.Vai|,CoIorado81658.970.476.2201.970.476.7491(F).SnowdonHopkins.com
'*t!,".
American tnnd Title Association Commitment - 1982
TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT
BY
rstewartI r title guaranty company
Order Number: 6038331
We agree to issue policy to 1,ou according to the terms of the Commitment. When *'e shorv the policy amount and
your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date
shorvn in Schedule A.
lf the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met lvithin six months after the Commitment Date, our
obligation under this Commitment lvill end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment rvill end rvhen the Policy is
issued and then our obligation to you rvill be under the Policy.
Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the follorving:
The Provisions in Schedule A.
The Requirements in Schedule B-1.
The Exceptions in Schedule B-ll.
The Conditions on Page 2.
This Commitment is not valid rvithout SCHEDULE A and Sections I and Il of SCHEDULE B.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, EXAMINATION, REPORT OR REPRESENTATION OF T'ACT OR
TITLE AND DOES NOT CREATT AND SHALL NOT BE THE BASIS OF ANY CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE,
NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION OR OTHER TORT CLAIM OR ACTION. THE SOLE LIABILITY OF
COMPANY AND ITS TITLE INSURANCE AGENT SHALL ARISE UNDER AND BE GOVERNED BY PARAGRAPH
4 OF THE CONDITIONS.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stetvart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
affixed bv its dulv authorized officers on the date sholn in Schedule A.
Countersi sned:
Stewall '['itle of Co]orado - Vail Division
97 Main St.. Suite W-201
Edu,alds. CO 81632
stewart
.fffr'f..c"^-""
fJ.It."_'l':.a'i:i
1?i.. r308 .€f1t'sY
Order Number: 6038331
I of 2 Commitment - 235 WO Disclosure
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1. Effective Date: November 27. 2006 at 8:00 a.m.
2. Policv or Policies To Be Issued:
Order No.: 6038331
Amount of Insurance
(a) A.L.T.A. Owner's
Proposed Insured:
TO BE DETERMINED
(b) A.L.T.A. Loan
(Standard)
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
Fee Simple
4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in:
|.at29:
LARCH, S.A., A PANAMANTAN CORPORATION
[,ot 30:
CALUMET HOLDINGS. S.A.. A PANAMANIAN CORPORATION
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
LOTS 29 and 30, '
BLOCK I,
VAIL/POTATO PATCH,
According to the plat recorded March 5, 19'74in Book 233 at Page 629 as Reception No. 12952'1 .
COUNTY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLORADO.
Purported Address: STATEMENTOFCHARGES
807 Potato Patch Drive These charges are due and payable
Vail, Colorado 8 1657 before a Policy can be issued:
PREMIUM:
Mortgage: $100.00
STEWART TITLE
C UARANTY COMPANY Commitment - Schedule A
Page I of I
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULEB-Sectionl
REQUIREMENTS
Order Number: 6038331
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
1. Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed
for record, to wit:
3. This report is for informational purposes only. No policy will be issued.
STEWART TITLD
G UARANTY COMPANY
Corumiament - Schedule B I
Page I of I
Order Number: 603&13 |
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULEB-Section2
EXCEPTIONS
Order Number: 6038331
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to
the satisfaction of the Company:
1 Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shorvn by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any facts, which a
correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose, and which are not shown by the public
records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
laws and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
commitment.
6. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance
thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
7. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales.
8. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation
or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area.
9. Reservations or exceptions in Patents, or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, including the
reservation of a right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as
reserved in United States Patent recorded August 15, 1935 in Book 93 atPage278.
10. Restrictive Covenants recorded March 5, l9'l4lnBook233 at Page 628 as Reception No. 129526and
as amended in instrument recorded September 24, 1975 in Book 241 aIPage 950 as Reception No.
138069.
1 1 . Alf matters shown on the plat of VailiPotato Patch, recorded in Book 233 at Page 629 as Reception
No. 129527.
t2. Easement Deed dated August6, l98l recorded at Book 3T7,Page 614 as Reception No. 223976.
(The above items affect both [,ots 29 and 30)
STEWART TITLE
G UARAN'I'Y COMPANY
Commitmelt - Schedule B 2
Page I of 2
Order Numb€r: 6038331
13. A Deed of Trust dated February 18, 1W2, executed by S.A. Iarch, a Panamanian Corporation, to the
Public Trustee of Eagle County, to secure an indebtedness of $400,000.00 in favor of California
Commerce Bank recorded December 28, 1993 in Book 628 atPage 668 as ReceptionNo.5%t729.
14. A Deed of Trust dated Novemberg,Iggg,executed by tarch, S.A., a Panamanian Corporation, to the
Public Trustee of Eagle County, to secure an indebtedness of $1,000,000.00 in favor of California
Commerce Bank recorded December 28, 1999 as Reception No. 718962.
(The above items affect l,rr,tzg)
STEWART TITI,E
GUARANTYCOMPANY
Cornmitment - Schedul€ B 2
Page 2 of2
Oder Numbcn 6038331
DISCLOSURES
Pursuant to C.R.S. l0-lI-122, notice is hereby given that:
A. THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIALTAXING D]STRICT;
C.
A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED
FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT;
INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER. OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR
NOTE: ColoradoDivisionoflnsuranceRegulations3-5-l,ParagraphCofArticleVllrequiresthat"Everytitleentity
shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title
enrity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the
transaction which was closed." Provided that Stewart Title of Cotorado - Vail Division conducts the closing of
the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception
number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lender's Title Policy when issued.
NOTE: Affirmative Mechanic's Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception No.
4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Orvner's Poticy to be issued) upon compliance with the
following conditions:
A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a
condominium or torvnhouse unit.
B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the
land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled Mechanic's
and Materialmen's Liens.
D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased,
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded
liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the
builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; fully executed Indemnity agreements
satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of
the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for lvhich the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ANY
OF THE COYERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN, UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY
SATISFIED.
Stcrvart Title of Col(n ado - Vail Division File Number: 603U33I
Disclosures
B.
MINERAL DISCLOSURE
Order No: 6038331
To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. l0-ll-123, the Company makes the following
disclosure:
(a) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or
otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a
third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in
the property; and
(b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission.
NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIES ONLY IF SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THE
TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLUDFS AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED
MINERALS.
Stewart 'Iitle of Colorado - Vail Division File Number: 6038331
Mineral Dsclosure
Rev.07/2001
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V of rhe Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or
through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third
party unless the institution provides you rvith a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the
type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be
disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of
the privacy policies and practices of Stewart Title Guaranty Company and Stelvart Title of Colorado
- Vail Division.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
. lnformation we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms.
. Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others.
. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
. lnformation that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent
or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherrvise in an amended Pri vacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic
personal information rvill be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers
to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers non affiliated companies
that perform services on our behalf.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH
ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to knorv
that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and
procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
Some states give you the right to access and correct nonpublic personal information. You may contact us
in writing at out Home Office, if your state larv gives you this right.
Revised 6/05
,
CONDITIONS
I. DEFINITIONS
(a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. (b) "Public Records"
means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting your title - according to the
state statutes where your land is located.
LATER DEFECTS
The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section ll may be amended to shorv any defects, liens or
encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between
the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B -
Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment.
EXISTING DEFECTS
If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we
may amend Schedule B to shown them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or
encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this
information and did not tell us about it in writing.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Our only obligation is to issue to you the policy referred to in this Commitment when you have met
its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this
Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this
Commitment when you acted in good faith to:
Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I'
Eliminate with our written consen, .nlt"*""O,,ons shown in Schedule B - Section II.
We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment
and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you'
5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title
to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms.
Order Number: 603833I
2 of 2 Commitment - 235 WO Disclosure
3.
4.
Hepworth-Pawlak Ceotechnical, lnc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
February 14,2007
Mr. Pedro Cerisola
c/o Snowdon and Hopkins Architects
Attn: Pam Hopkins
P.O. Box 3340
Vail, Colorado 81658
Subject:
JobNo. 1060938
Additional Recommendations for Retaining Walls, Proposed Addition to
Cerisola Residence, l.ot 29, Potato Patch, 805 Potato Patch Rosd. Vait.
Colorado.
Dear Mr. Cerisola and Ms. Hopkins:
As requested, we are providing additional recommendations for deep foundation walls of
the addition and for the proposed site walls along the west and north property lines.
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a subsoil study for design of
foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated Decemb er 29, 2006,
JobNo. 106 0938.
The uphill wall of the addition will be about 2l feet tall. Part of the existing uphill
foundation wall next to the proposed addition will be underpirmed to a depth of about 8
feet. Tied-back shoring walls are proposed to support the cut face ofthe addition and the
cut below the existing foundation. Additional design parameters are requested for the
shoring wall and deep wall designs. The site walls are proposed to be constructed roughly
3 to 5 fcct inside the propeity lines anti be up to 12 feet high. The north wali wiil be an
extension ofthe existing wall below Potato Patch Road and will need to support any road
surcharge in addition to the hillside slope.
Foundation Walls: the proposed uphill foundation walls are much taller than assumed in
our previous study report. Walls that are grealer than about l5 feet tall should be designed
for a uniform earth pressure of 25 H in psf where H is the wall height in feet. This
pressure assumes the walls will be restrained against lateral movement. We expect that
the shoring wall for the addition will be constructed against the cut face and consist of a
soil nail design for permanent earth support. The shoring for the cut below the existing
Parker 303-841-7119 o Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 . Silverthorne 970-468-1989
Mr. Pedro Cerisola
February 14,2007
Page2
foundation will probably require tie-backs (rather than soil nails) to restrain the shoring
wall against lateral movement. A shoring contractor should be contacted for specific
design and construction details. with either shoring system, an underdrain should be
provided behind the wall that connects to the perimeter foundation drain. Based on our
exploratory boring profile, the lower part ofthe excavations could be into sandstone
bedrock. The rock should be relatively competent with respect to slope stability and have
a bedding dip generally down to the north.
site walls: The proposed walls are probably too close to the property lines to use soil
nail or mechanically stabilized earth walls without extending offof the property. A
possible wall type consists of micro-piles that use closely spaced vertical piles at the wall
face and battered piles behind the face. The piles are connected at the top with a cap beam
and the vertical piles are faced with concrete or other wall material. An underdrain should
be provided behind the wall facing. A shoring contractor should be contacted for specific
design and construction details.
We will be available to further discuss the proposed excavation plans when requested. In
the meantime, if you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office-
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC.
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
SLPivad
JVA, Inc. - Attn: Derek Henderson, PE
Beck Building Company - Attn: Frank Payne
ffi'.r&
wtrs
Job No- 106 0938
GE tecfr
.llY'ETTER
March 8, 2007
Snowden and Hopkins Architects, P.C'
PO Box 3340
Vail. Colorado 81658
'-''' AffitiOlr-.|ft. 416p1-14tuking';'' -''' -': :'':' -n"-: l
RE:
Ms. Hopkins:
Recommendations for Retaining Wall Systems for the
FroposeA Addition to the Cerisola Residence, Lot 29, 805
Potato Patch Road, Vail, Colorado.
Due to the proximity of the retaining wall !o lfre grop9'lv lin"-1i| Potato
F"t"t no"d, a fiil wail, such as a g-osynthetically reinforce!.soil1v,3lf , is
not feasible. A more traditional soil nail or tieback wall could posslDry
;;;flil;ih. the lxistins gtllitieg undel the qo4!a$ tw9ul{,!!outt!-f =
permanent easement.
Given the above restraints, we agree with the recommendations of HP
Geotech, and believe tn"i" ti"r6pile wallis the best retaining wallsystem
f* ihi. ;it". A micropile wall generally consists of vertical and near
u"rti"rf , tt"ll diameieiorilled'pites' thepiles are connected at the top
;iiil;p, or grade u""m. Ati"r installat'ron, a verticalexcavation takes
ilri* i" ti""i u:t ine pires,:andlshotsrete is applied.to the face of the wall.
The shotcrete can tn"n U" used to attach a facing material' such as
segmentaliretainils wall biocks
,;,. ,
20300 W. HighwaYT2,Arvada, CO 80007 r 303i279-4458 o lavtQtl'279-0908 ' www'yenter'com
we have recently constructed a similar type of wall in vail. The scolnick
residence at 2g35 Basingdale Boulevard in Vailwas experiencing a failure
under the road due to an unexpected drainage line. Micropiles were
drilled from the edge of the road to act as a retaining wall, and to support
the edge of the roid, The piles were then faced with shotcrete' The plans
showed a boulder stacked wall in front of the micropiles'
We are available to discuss these options if you need any more
information. lf you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Respectfully,
7<e-r.;-
- +i, ' -::----'---j:q.'=::-;r.,.:- - :-;:=-. r. .{'. :.i:t-il;:: :?-- :'=i. r' : = : :i : :::':--::i-;-_:-:- =a i
Kevin Brooks, EIT
Yenter ComPanies, Inc.
' Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
P. O. Drawer 1887
Silverthome, Colorado 80498
Phone; 970-468-1989
Fax: 970-468-5891
emailr hpgeo4@hpgeotech.com
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
February 27,2007
Mr. Pedro Cerisola
c/o Snowdon and Hopkins Architects
Attn: Pam Hopkins
P. O. Box 3340
Vail, Colorado 81658
JobNo. &7 Wl7
Subject: Rocldall HazudEvaluation forLots 29 znd3Q PotatoPatch" Block l, 805
and 807 Potato Patch Road, Vail, Colorado.
DearMr. Cerisola and Ms. Hopkins:
As requested, we have conducted a rocldatl hazard waluation for Lots 29 and 30 in the
Potato Patc[ Block 1, Vail, Colorado. The project site and vicinity are shown on Figure
l. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical (2006 alrd}A0l has performed a subsoil study for
foundation design of a proposed addition on Lot 29. Our services for this study were
performed according to our January 29,2007 professional services agreement to
Snowdon and Hopkins Architects. A field reconnaissance of the project site was made on
lanuary 29,200'l to observe and map potential rockfall start areas, paths and runouts in
the pro-iect vicinity. This report $nunarizes our findings and presents orn conclusions
and recomrnendations.
Summary of Findings:
l. Lots 29 and 30 are not in potential rockfall paths or nrnouts associated with the
prominent sandstone outcrops that are located to the north ofthe Potato Patctr, see
Figure 2. The proposed addition onLot 29 is not er<posed to a rockfall risk from
the upslope outcf,ops and theproposed addition should not increase the inherent
roclf,all risk to oristing buildings in the area. As discussed in Finding 3 below,
Glenwood Springs 970-945-7988 . Parker 303-841-7119 . Colorado Springs 719-633.556?.
Mr. Pedro Cerisola
February 27,2N7
Page2
precautions during constnrction ofthe addition should be taken to prevent
dislodgment of on-site rock blocks.
2. Serreral small rock blocks aDd orscrops are pres€nt on Lot 30. These oscrops and
blocks are potential souroes for rocl&ll to down slope areas to the south oflot
30. I\fany of these potential rocl&ll blocks will likely be removed during
construction of a residence on Lot 30. This will reduce, but not totally eliminatg
the rockfall risk to oristing buildings located down slope to the south oflot 30.
3. Precautions should be taken during construction on Lots 29 and 30 to prevent
- dislodgment of on-site rock blocks from the er(cavations and near by hillside.
Dislodged rock blocks could develop into rocldall to could potentially damage
doum slope buildings, soe Figure l.
Proposed llwclopment: At the time of this study, a 530 square foot addition was being
considered on the western side of the existing house on l,at 29, see Figure 2.
Dwelopment plans were not available for Iot 3Q but a residence may be built on this lot
sometime in the future. Tlre proposed addition onlat 29 will be a two story structure
above a basement level. Becanse ofthe steep hillside on the lot relatively deep
construction excavations will be needed of the proposed addition. When building and
grading plans for Lot 30 are availablg we should review tle plans to determine ifthe
proposed development is consisted with the finding ofthis study.
Site Conditions: Lots 29 and 30 are located on a v€ry steep, south-facing hillside that
lies to the east of Red Sandstone Creelg see Figure l. The hillside on the two lots has an
average slope of about 45 percent. The hillside becomes steeper down slope. Down
slope ofthe two lots tlre hillside has an average slope of about 56 percent. The hillside
transitions to a moderately sloping bench with an average slope ofabout 20 percent to the
north ofthe two lots. IMajor drainages do not cross tlrough the two lots. Single family
residences are located on many of the nearby lots, see Figure l. Multi-family residences
are located near the botlom ofthe hillside to the snrth. Vegaaion on the hillside is
mostly sage and other brush.
JobNo.4Ol 0017 cA5tecrr
Mr. Pedro Cerisola
February 27,2007
Page 3
Geotogic Setting: The regional geologc map by Scott and Others (2W2) shows thatthe
two lots are undedain by interbedded arkosic sandstong conglomerate and shale in the
middle Pennsylvanian-age, Mnturn Formation. Bedding in the area strikes to the
northeast and dips moderately to the northwesl see Figure 2. On the two lots the
formation rock is usrally covert by a thin layer of pre-Bull Lakeage, g)aciil till, btrt a
small outcrop of sandstone is present in the central part oflot 30. The on-site rock
blocks in the northern part of Lot 30 are associated with the till. Six and one-half feet of
till was encountered in our exploratory boring on Lot 29 (Ilepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, 2006).
Rockfall Hazerds: Potential rockfall hazards in the pro.iect area are shown on Figure 2.
This map is based on our field observationg aerial photograph interpretations and review
ofpublished regional roclfall information (Schmueser and Associates, 1984 and the
Town of Vail 2000). The prinary rockfall bazud is from the prominent sandstone
outcrops located to the north of the Potato Pdch. I.dts29 and 30 are not located in this
potential hazard area. A secondary rockftllbaad is associated with the local sandstone
outcrops and till related rock blocks on the steep hillside in the vicinity of Lots 29 aod30.
This secondary fuzard area does not pres€ot a pdentid tlneat to dwelopment ofLo/rs29
and 30 because constnrction on these two lots will be in the potential rockfall start ar€a.
Construction on these two lots should reduce the poturtial risk to down slope building if
precautions are taken during construction to prev€nt dislodgment ofthe rock blocks and
rmstable outcrops on the hillside near the construction sites-
Limitations: This study was conducted according to generally acc€pted engineering
geology principles and practices in this area, d this time. We make no warranty either
express or irnplied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based onourfield observations, theproposed dwelopment shownonFigure2 and our
experience in the area. This report has been prepared exclusively for our client and is an
evaluation of potential risks to dwelopment on the two lots associated with rocldall.
Job No. 4ffl 0017 c&hacrr
Mr. Pedfo Cerisola
February 27,2OO7
Page4
We are not responsible for technical interprAAions by others of our information. We
should rwiew development plans for l,ot 3Q when available, to determine if they are
consist€d with the inted of our reoommendations pres€nt€d in this report.
If you have questions or need further assistancg please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH _ PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC.
RalphG. Mock
Engineering Geologist
Reviewed by
George W. Benecke III, P. E.
RGMTI
attachmeds Figure I - hoject location
Figure 2 -Potential Rockfdll Areas
Wr;f#
Job No. 4fl 0017 cA8tach
Mr. Pedrc Cerisola
February27,2007
Page 5
RETDRENCES
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical,zffi6, Subsoil Sndyfor FoundotionDesign, Proposed
Addition, Lat 29, Potato Pstch, 805 Potato Patch Drive, Yail, Colorado: Prepared
for Pedro Cerisola, do Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, Vail, Colorado (Job No.
106 0938, Deoemha 29, 2W).
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnica! 20O7, Addifiorul Recommendations for Retaining Wolls,
ProposedAdditiontoCerisola Residence, Lot 29, pototo Patch, Potsto Pdch
Rd, Vail, Colorafu: Prepared for Pedro Cerisolg c/o Snowdon and Hopkins
Architects, Vait Colorado (Job No. 106 0938, February 14,2007).
Schmueser and Associates, 1984, Roclfall Study - Tovwr of Vail: Prepared for the Town of
Vail (Novernb a, 29, 1984).
Scott, R B. and Olher+ 2@\ GeologtMq of the Vail Yest Qaahangle, fugle Courrty,
Coloradoy'U. S. Geological Survey, Mscellaneous Field Studies Map 2369,
Version 1.0.
Town of Vail ,2W0, Aficial RuSall Hazud Map, Twwt of lrail: Prepared by the Town
of Vail, VaiI, Colorado (Adopted by the Toum Council on October l7,20o,O).
JobNo.407(X)17 ct&ecrr
€
P - .*JK 153*
lfeR+- l.eeE"
IEESlgE,'oJ@E
co9('ro
:.F
E|eg a g.
i|;c E - f,E
ElgE € flEE
flEI 3lE #lEE
t|F9u
$IFgE
407 0017 Potato Patch Lots 29 and 30
Potential Rockfall Areas
HEFVI:ORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNiCAt-
iit:r,.'rii i.:r !.::, r i,. ', . ',, '. .
!.-l.r r.'.,l:r:r F, , ,.i r:.
,.:.. 'r,r. n .l :: ',:,1 . . , i
r.'1,, ,t,(, i : .' . !.i :: - - ir'. .
t '\ Lr;a-!,i:,.'-.::;
('.:r: ri: l'iri.,i'i,i!. ",,ii-, :. .
SIJBSOILSTUDY
FOR FOI]NDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED N)DITION
LOT Z9,POTATO PATCI|
805 POTATO PATCH DRIVE
VAJL, COLORADO
JOB NO. 106 0938
DECEMBER 29,2A06
PREPAREDFOR:
MR PEDRO CTRISOI-A
C/O SNO}VDON A}ID HOPKINS ARCIIITECTS
ATTN: PAM HOPKINS
P. O. BOX3340
VAIL, COLORADO 81658
i',r,-iiq'1 -1q11-i+j-71j4 e i.'1rl1r;;1J1-, S1.r'irrgs ;l:)-6rr iit',1 o :,!l\.(!lh(rr-jt,-. t)7i-JirS-l.t,.,tt
dFtecm
fi
PT]RPOSE AIYD SCOPE OF ST1JDY
This report presenls the results of a subsoil study lbr a proposed acldition to an exising
residence located atLot29- Potato Parch- 805 Poraro Patch Drive. Vail- Colorado. The
project site is shou'n on Figure 1. The purpose of the strrdv rvas to develop
recommendalions for the tbundation design. The study v!'as coriducled in accordance
with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Snowdon and Hopkins
Architects dated October 24-2006-
An exploratory boring was drilled to obtain informalion on the subsurtace conditions.
Samples of the subsoils and bedrock obtained during the lield exploration rvere tesled in
the laboralory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The
results of the fieid exploration and laboralory lesting were analyzed ro develop
recommendalions for foundarion types- depths and allowable pressures for the proposed
building foundation. t his report summarizes the data obtained during this study and
presenls our conclusions- design recommendalions and orher geotechnical engineering
considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions'
. encountered -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed addirion will be a two story slructrre above a basement level and anached
lo the west end of the existing residence as shorvn on Figure I. Grcund floor will be slab-
on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatjvely minor wjth cut depths up
to aboul I0 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings- typical of the proposed
type of construction.
Ifbuilding loadings, localion or grading plans change signilicantly from those described
above, we should be nodfied to re-evaluale the recommendations contained in rhis report.
SITE CONDITIONS
The site is occupied with a single family, one and two slory residence with a lower
walkout level. Vegetation consisls oflandscaping- grass. weeds, aspen and evergreen
c€Stectlob No. 106 0918
t;ees- The glound surlace slopes steepll down lo lhe sourh ar a gr-irde of abour 45 percenr-
The north sjcle ol'the residencb is an asphalt par,ed drireuar..
FIELD EXPLORATION
The lleid exploration lbr the projecr was conducted on December 15. 2006. One
exploratory boring was drilled just off the end of the existing driveway at lhe localion
shown on Figure I lo evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with
4 inch diameter conlinuous llighr augers powered by a rruck-mounred cME-55 drill ilg.
The boring was logged by a representative of Hepu,orth-Par+Jak Georechnical. lnc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch l.D. spoon samplers- The
samplers were driven inro the subsoils al various depths rvith blows from a 140 pound
hammer l-aliing 30 inches. This test is simi.lar to the standard penetralion test described
by ASTM Method D-l 586- The penetration resistance values are an indicarion of the
relativedensityorconsisrencyofrhesubsojlsandhardnessofrhebedrock. Depthsat
which the samples were taken and the penetration resislance values are shown on the Log
of Exploratory Boring. Figure 2. The samples were retumed to our laboratory for review
by the project engineer and testing-
SI.]BSURFACE CONDITI ONS
A graphic log ofthe subsurface conditions encountered at lhe site is shown on Figure 2.
The subsoils consisl of about 7 t/z feet ofman-placed fill overlying silty clayey sandy
gravel with cobbles. Sandstone bedrock was encountered at a depth ofl4 feet. Drilling
in the upper dcnsc granular soils with auger equipment r,r'as difficulr due to the cobbles
and possible boulders and drilling refusal was encounrered in the deposit.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obrained from the boring included natural
moisture contenl, gradation analyses and Anerburg limits. Results of gradation analyses
performed on a disturbed drive sample of the weathered sandstone are shown on Figure 4.
The laborarory testing is surnmarized in Table l.
Job No. 106 0918 e&Btecr't
--l-
No liee \,vater \ .as encountered in the boring at rhe rime of drilling and rhe subsoils r.vere
sliehtlv moisr ro rnoist,
FOI'NDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The natural course granular soils and bedrock are adequate for support of spread fooring
foundations. All existing fill should be removed from beneath fooring and floor slab
areas. The sandslone bedrock rvas encounlered near 1o below expected excavalion cul
depths.
DESIGN RECOMMEIYDATIONS
FOLTNDATJONS
Considering the subsurface condirions encountered in the exploratory boring and the
nature of the proposed conslruction. we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural granular soils-
The design and conslruction crjteria presenled below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation syslem.
l) Footings placed on the undjsrurbed nanrral granular soils should be
designed for an allowable bearing pressure of2,500psf. Footingsplaced
near the uphill side of the addition at the basement level can be designed
for an allowable bearing pressure of3,500 psf- Based on experience. we
expect seltlement offootings designed and constructed as discussed in this
section will be aboul I inch orless.
2) The footings should have a rninimum widrh of l6 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feer for isolared pads.
Exterior footings and footings benearh unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement offoundations at leasl 42 inches below exterior arade is
typically used in this area,
4) Conlintrous foundation wa.lls should be reinforced top and botrom ro span
local anomalies. Foundation walls acring as retaining struclures should
r)
Job No. 106 09-18 e&9tecn
-.t-
also be clesigned to resisr laleral earth pressures as discussed in the
"I oundarion and Reraining Walls" sectiorr o I rhis report.
The existing iill. an1 topsoil and loose or disrtrrbed soils should be
removed and the footing bearing level extended dor,r,n lo the relatively
dense nalural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then
be moistened and compacled. If water seepage is encounlered- the fooring
areas should be dewarered belbre. concrete placement.
A represenlative ofthe geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrele placemenl 10 evaluale bearing conditions.
FOUNDAT]ON AND RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls and relaining struclures r,r,hich are laterally supporred and can be
expected 1o undergo onlv a slight anrount ofdeflection should be designed for a lareral
earth pressure computed on the basjs ofan equivaient fluid unit weight ofar least 50 pcf
for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered rerainin-q structures
which are separale from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to
mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth
pressure computed on the basis of an equivalenr fluid unit weight of at leasl 40 pcf for
backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Backfill should nol contain vegerarion,
topsoil or rocks larger rhan about 6 inches.
All foundatjon and retaining slructwes should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings. lraffic, construction materjals and
equipment- The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward
sioping backfill surface .*'ill increase ihe lateral pressure imposed on a lbundarion wall or
retaining struclure- An underdrain should be provided to prevenl hydrostaric pressrue
buildup behind walls.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifis and compacted to al least 90% of rhe maximum
standard Procior density ar a mojsiure conrent near oplimum. Backfill in pavemenl and
walkway areas should be conrpacted to al least 95% of the maximum staldard Proctor
density. Care should be taken nol lo overcompacl the backfill or use large equipmenr
5\
ol
.)ob No. 106 09i8 c&5tecn
-)-
ncar the wall. since this could cause excessir,e lareral pressure on the $a]I. Some
selllt'rltenl o1'deep lbundation uall backllJl should be expected- evetr ilthe ntalenal is
placed e-orecll-v-. ancl could result in distress ro lhcilities constnrcted on rhe backljll.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining u'all footings r.viil be a combinalion olthe
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation malerials and passive earth pressure
againsi fte side of the footing. Resistance to sliding ar the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient offriction of0.5. Passive pressure ofcompacted
backfill against rhe sides ofthe footings can be calculated using an equivalenr fluid unir
weight of 400 pcl-. The coeflicienr of frjction and passive pressure valnes recommended
above assume ultirnate soil strength. Suirable factors of safety should be included in rhe
design to limit the strain rvhjch u'ill occur al the ulljmare strengr.h- parricularly in the case
ofpassive resjstance. Fill placed against the sides ofthe lborings to resist lateral loads
shoujd be compacted ro ar least 95% of the maximum srandard proclor densiry ar a
moislure contenl near oDlimum.
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusjve oftopsoil, are suirable ro supporl lightly loaded slab-
on-grade conslruction- To reduce the effecls of some differenrial movement, floor slabs
should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which
ailow unreslrained vertical movement, Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce
damage due to shrinliage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcemenl should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use- A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel shourd be praced beneath
basemenl level slabs to I-acilitate drainage. This material should consisr of minus 2 inch
aggregale wirh at leasr 50?6 rerained on rhe No.4 sieve and iess inanZoh passing rhe No.
200 sieve.
All fill nraterials for support of floor slabs should be compacred ro al leasl 95oh of
maximum standard Proctor density al a moisture conlent near optimum. Required fill can
consisl ofthe on-site granular soils devoid ofvegetalion, lopsoil and oversized rock.
.lob No. 106 0938 c&5tecn
-o-
t.;NDI:RDRAIN S)'Sl ENI
Although liee rvarer \\as not encountered during our explorarion. ir has ber'n our
experience in mounlainous areas and where bedrock is shallow rhar local perched
groundr,later can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoll Frozen
ground during spring runoff can creale a perched condition. We reconrmend below-grade
conslrucll'on, sltch as retaining walls and basement areas, be protecled iiom wetting and
hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drajns should consist ofdrainpipe placed in the bottom ofthe rvall backfiil
sun-ounded above ihe invert level u'ith liee-draining granular materjal, The drain should
be placed at each level ofexcavation and at least I lbot below lowesr adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minirnum lTo to a suitable gravity oullet. Free-draining grannlar
material used in the ttnderdrain svstem should contain less rhan 2% passing the No. 200
st-eve- less than 50o/o passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches- The
drain gravel backfill should be ar leasl I % feet deep.
S]TE GRADING
The risk of construcljon-induced slope insrability at the site appears low provided rhe
addirion is located as planned and cut and fill depths are limited, We assume the cut
depths for the basement level will not exceed one level, abour l0 to l2 feer. Fills should
be limired to about 8 to l0 feet deep and nol be placed ar rhe dorvnhill side ofthe
residence- Embankment fills should be compacred ro at least 95%o of the maximum
slandard Proclor density near optimum moisture content. prior to fill placement, the
subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and
compacting to at leasl 95Yo of the maxjmum standard Proclor density. The fill should be
benched into the portions ofthe hjllside exceeding 20Yo prade.-'
Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizonlal to I vertjcal or
flatter and protected against erosion by revegelation or other means. The risk ofslope
instabiliry will be increased if seepage is encountered in cuts and flatler slopes may be
necessary. Ifseepage is encountered in permanenl culs, an investigation should be
conducled 1o determine if the seepage will adversely affecr the cut stability- This olfice
should review site grading plans for the projecl prior to conslmction.
Joh No. 106 0918 c&Bt crt
-7 -
SURFACE DRAI]\JAGF,
The follou'ing drainage precaulions should be observed during construclion and
maintained ar ali rimes aller the addition has been completed:
l) Inundation ol'the lbundation excavations and undelslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exlerior backfill should be adjusted lo near oprimum moisrure and
compacted to at least 95%o of the maximum standard Proctor densiry in
pavemenl and slab areas and lo ar least 907o of the maximum standard
Proclor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrouncling the exterjor ofrhe building should be
sloped ro drain awav from the foundation in all directjons. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the llrsr l0 feet in unpaved
areas and a minim'm slope of 3 inches in the firsi l0 feet in paved areas,
Free-draining wall backfill should be capped wirh abour 2 feet ofthe on-
site finer graded soils to reduce zurface waler infihratjon-
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond rhe limits of all
backfill.
LI]VtrTATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geolechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at &is time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled ar the localion in6icated
on figure l, the proposed type of construction and our expedence in the area. our
services do not include derermining lhe presence, prevention or possibiliry of mold or
other biological contaminanrs (MOBC) developing in the future. lfthe client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field ofpracrice should be
consulted. Our findings include inrerpolation and exrrapolarion ofrhe subsurface
conditions identified al the exploralory boring ancl variations in rhe subsurface condirions
may not become evident unlil excavalion is perlbrmed. If conditions encounlered durins
Joh No. 106 09-18 c&&ecn
-8-
conslrtlclioll appeardill'erent fi'orn those describeci in this repon. we should be notillcd so
lhat re-evaluation of the recomnrendations mav be ntade.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes- We
are nol responsible for technical inlerpretalions b1'others of our information. As rhe
project evolves- r.l'e should provide continued consultation and lield services during
conslruction to review and monitor the implemenlation of our recommendalions, and lo
verify that the recommendations have been appropriatel.v interpreted- Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modificarions lo rhe recommendarions
presented herein. We recommend on-site obsen'ation of excavations and tbundation
bearing strata and lesting ofstructural fill by a represenlative ofthe geotechnical
engineer.
RespectfuIly Submined.
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTEC}INICAL. INC.
JVA, Inc- - Ann: Bob Hunnes
Louis E. Eller
Reviewed by:
Steven L. Pawlak-
LEE/vad
ie$h#fD
15222 .:/J"rj!14"7P.i
Job No. 106 0938 c&Btecr'
I recrlro,
II IS7
I n FILL; silty clayey sand and gravel, scattered cobbles, firm, slighlly moisl to moist, mixed browns, some lopsoil
I l J ano organrcs.
I, F:Zl
I Kf; GRAVEL (GM-GC); silty, clayey, sandy, with cobbles and possible boulders, medium dense, slightty moisl, brown.
I vL:J
II f--r=l
I Ffi_ql
SANDSTONE BEDBOCK; wealhered and hard to very hard with depth, slightly moist, reddish brown.
I EiiEd
IIL
| | I Rehtively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch t.D. California liner sample.ll-
Ilr
I I Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), .l 3/B inch l.D. split spoon sample, ASTM-1586.
I
1A11. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 16 blows ota140 pound hammer falling 30 inches weretot tz required to drive the California or SPT samoler 12 inches.
T Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above the bottom of the log indicates multiple altempts were made lo
I advance the boring.
NOTES:
1. The exploratory boring was drilled on December 15, 20O6 with a 4-inch diameter conlinuous flight power auger.
2. The exploratory boring location was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
provided.
3. The exploratory boring elevalion was obtained by interpolation between contours shown on lhe site plan provided.
4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only lo the degree implied by the
method used.
]
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between I
material types and transitions may be gradual.
]
6. No free waler was encountered in the boring at the time ot drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time.
I
7. Laboratory Testing Results: I
WC = Water Content (7d I+4 : Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve I-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve I
LL = Liquid Limit (%) |
Pl - Plasticity Index (7")
|
106 0938 estecfr
HEPwoFar}}PAwt_Ax GEqrEcHNtc^L
LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1" = 30'
\..e
\ .-' \\r I
\\
\ LOT29
r\
\l
\\ EX'TNG \
. \ txrSilNG \\ \ RESIDENCE. \ F{ts5IUtsNUE \\ \ BO5 POTATO. \ dUC TUIAIU \\, \PATCH DRrvE \
\. ltt t"
(t \\
\\
\\
\\1\
\
\
I
t
I
\\
)\
\
\
8570
\l
I
I
\- - -T--
I
\
106 0938 ceeecrr
HEPSIa|ETI+PAIULA.K GEC''ECHNICAL
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 1
BORING 1
ELEV.: 8609.5'
12!12
WC=8.0
'2OO:25
LL:24
Pl:7
82/12
WC=6.6
+ 4:2
-2OO= 2a
50/3
(t)
(D
tL
-c
o-(I)o
NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING106 0938
dt
-'6
@
9xg2d
co
o\o
\o
dz
,o
ri Iz!fi(/)5pL_
=ifLJF
Hbxtl-r v(, .kv-d{u+o
=&aiF;+oEioF=lU -1
I (J''
24tHB. 7 HB T|ME RFADTNGS I
0 45 MlN. 15 MtN. 6oMtNj9MtN.4 MtN 1 MtN #2m
U.S. STANDAHD SERIES
#5O 'f30 #16
CTEAR SOUARE OPENINGS
3lg 314' 11/? 3', 5',6'9" roo
o
LrJzaF
E
Fz
arJo
lrl(L
oz.6U'
.L
Fz.
UJoE.
UJ(L
.005 009 .0i9 037 O74 150 3gt1 .600 1 18
OIAMFTFR OF PABTICLES IN MIIIIMETERS
2.36 9.5
12.5
J/ 5 't52
127
GRAVEL 7"SAND SILT AND CLAY 24
LIOUID LIMIT %
SAMPLE OF: Weathered Sandstone
PLASTICITY INDEX O/O
FROM:Boring 1 al 15 Feet
106 0938 effiecfrHEPwoBTI+PawLax GEoTEG|.|NT^L
GBADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4
FILE NODE
P. 1
* * x Cot4MLJl'lICATIof{ RESIJLT REPoRT ( nFR. Z.A@7 4.67Pn ) x * *
TTI SNOI^IDOI.tsJ{OPKINS
OPTION ADDRESS (GROUP) RESULT PFGE
51: r,rEt1oR, TX t'B3Z7SWAB P. B/B
REASON FOR EFROR
E_1 ) HANG UP OR LII.IE FRILE-3) NO ANSI^IER
E-2) BUSYE-4) NO FRCSINILE CONNECTIO{"I
PO Box 3340 o Vatl. Colorodo 81658 r Phone:970.476-2201 . Fax: 970.476"7491
Facsimile T
Date:
To:
From:
/aarw ?a= 4,11_ X_Lo_b_
RE:
Number of pages, irrcludirrg this transmittal sheet: fu ! b:
@tt*.pwr
FILE I'IODE
P. 1
* e( x coMt4uNIcATIoN RESULT REPORT ( nffi.. ?.?W7 4|A4Wl '
x * *
TTI SNOI{DOf{8JSPKINS
OPTION ADDRESS (GROUP) RESI.JLT PAGE
51e HEI'0R, TX LWngA%iA P. 9/9
REASO}{ F'OR ERRORE-1) FFNG UP OR LINE FAILE-3) FN ANSI^IER
E-Z) BI,JsYE-4) NO FACSIT4ILE COI.XWCTION
PO Box 3340 r Vall. Co
/ laufpr-tup_313" AIA_b
Number of pages, including this transminalsheeu -fr thWmu*rum)W
&tt+,pffi1-
Facsimile Transmittal
Dare: .n.ln l,A-1-
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&IECT:
Plannlng and Environmental Counission
Conmunity DeveloPment Department
July 23, 1990
A reguest for a variance fron the wall height .ieatii"t"nt on t-oi zg, Block r, vail Potato Patcht 8o5
Potato Patch Drive.Appllcants: Patsy and Pedro Cerisola
I.DESCRTPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOUESTED
The appticants are the ownera of Lot 29, Block 1' VaLI
Potato Patch (805 Poiato Patch Drlve)-and.are requesting 1
variance from a ."iit- arlowabre wail helght to-provide for
it"-""""tro.tiorr-"i-i ".r singte fanity hone- oT the lot.
The variarr"" t"q.r"steA-woufa ittow for-wall heights ranging
ii"t i ieet, up to 10.5 feet in height'
Section 18.58.020 (c) of the Town of Vail zoning code allows
for a maxinurn *.ir'r,!igtt ot 3 feet within the front setback
ii"., and up t" i-reei-ott aty other area of the property'
itii'sectio-n of the code reads as follows:
rrFences, hedges, walls, and landscaplng screens' where
not restrf.lEa-iv covenant or other leg3l instrument'
shatt not eiceea'tnte" feet in heigfl! within any
required front setback area and stritt not exceed six
feet in freighi on .tty other portion of-a site' -provided[tii [ign"='i.r,""t, fredges-, i^'atrs, or landscaping
screens ,"v l"--i"ifioriz6a by the zoning adroinistrator
where necessary to screen public utility eguipment' No
barbed *ir"-oi'eieclrtcaLl-y charged fence shall be
erected or maintained' It
134 feet of the proposed retaining wall nould be within the
front setback arEi ina 51 feet wo'ita be out of the front
setback area. Aii ;- the wall is on the appl.icantrs
property.
The average sloPe of this lot beneath the proposed residence
;; e;i;;iay is'appioiinaterv.50 Dercent' rn order to
access the site,-ifi; appticairts aie proposlng a driveway
with a rnaxinun grade of 8 Percenc'
II. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
A. This lot ls located within the
Residentlal zone distrlct.
B. The adJacent land uses are as
1. North - Potato Patch Road
zoned Prinary/secondary.
A. Consideration of Factors:
Primary/Secondary
follows:
and Ipts 5 t 6, both
2. South - Tract A, zone Agricultural & open Space'
3. Eaat - Tract A, zoned Agricultural & open space'
4. t{est - Lot 30, zoned Prfunary/Secondary'
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18'62'06o of
the vail u""i"ipif-c-ae, the Depaffinent of connunlty-
Developnent rec-onmends ipproval- of the requested varLance
based uPon the following factors:
1.
The requested variance, if approved, would-not
"li""i"div affect lrte uie or Lniolment of adJacent
;;;;;;r;t-i"a wourd not block- oi inpede vl-ews
from any surrounding properties' The westernmost
i"iii"ii,g wirr wour6 be irnosr ent.!rely screened
;;;-trd by the sitlng of .the residence (eee
iliictrea sii,e pran1. Fortiory o{ the eastern
i"i.i"i"s rrarr-wouiit le viEible from properties
i;;;Ge Selow this lot. Ilolilever, the applicants
ii*r" oroposed to heavily landscape the area
iii!ai-.tEiv-u"i"* "t a r-n front oi the retaining
;;ii:--fi"'"ppir""ntrs are proposing to lre.ak up-
irrE-r""t ot lle wall with the planting of three 8-
foot Engl"ten tpr..ce, one g-foot.Blue sprucer and,
il;;" 5:inJrr caiiper aspen inrnediatery J'n front of
the wall.
All retainJ-ng walls wlll be flnlshed with a atone
"""".i-iicin6, and thls treatnent wlll natch the
;r;1i;"-iili;h on ttt" exterior of the residence'
ilia;"-u"rt"*t. will provide a unified apPearance
on the lot.
2.
The topographic condltlons on thig lot are such
trrit tit.-uuita.ute area of the slte Ls very-well
defined. Because the average slope on the lot
anrproximates 50t, access onto thls Elte is
;Iiffi;il-aitriiitrt. rrt" appricants are proposins
;-d;i;;ey wrtrr an average giade of 8 percent'
wntcn the-staff considerl a reasonable grade to--
access the property. The pro-posed retainlng- walls
ii"-"E"t""a-ry io sirpport g-iades both above the
driveway and below the drivewaY'
The PLannlng staff believes that the proposed
retaining will.s are necessary to ensure
riiufrf"itl.on of ihe slopes and Potato Patch Road'
ina we feel that the pro-posa1 is reasonable and
c-it"infy necessary on this steep sl-te' The
applicants have re-searched using a 3r tiered wall'
i-"-;;e;; to avoid reguesting a variance, however'
tii"-iorrt analysis aid bearing pressures fron
pot"to Patch R6ad would structurally not allow for
such a design.
3.
The staff finds that
have no slgnificant
consLderations.
the reguested variance will
J.npact uPon anY of the above
IV. FINDINGS
A.
The Plannincr and EnviEorunental. gomnissioT shall nake the
t"t'tti"a " tttti""="t
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a
iilit-'Ji Ep"liiii-privilese iT"?':l'tent with the
itritationi on ot-ner proferties classLfied ln the sane
district.
B. That the granting of th9 variance will not be
detrinentar
-lo-tf,e publlc health, safety or velfare'
;;;;;r;iii-tj"iio"i to propertiis or inprovenents i
the vicinitY.
c.That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
followl.ng reaE ons:
L. llhe strLct literal interpretatl'on or enforcement
"i tfte specified regulat-lon would result ln
practicai dlfficultf or unnecessary physical
fi;;d;hi;-incon"itteirt wtttr the objectives of this
title.
2. There are exceptlons or extraordlnary
circunstances -or condltlons appllcable to the same
site of the varlance that do not apply generally
to other propertles in the same zone'
3. The strLct lnterpretation or enforcernent of the
"p""fiiea r-guf"ifon sould deprive the appllcant
o-f privtlegei enjoyed by-the owners of other
prolerties-in the sane district'
STAFF RECOMUENDATION
The staff recommendation is for approval of the varLance
recruest for a uaximum wal'I height of 1o'5 feetr -per the
;;;i;;=-""utitt"a by snowdon in!-Hopkins, Architects, sheet
a:i,-ait"d Juty 13, i990. lte believe the reguest would not
te-i tiant of -special privilegg and that the variance would
not 16 detrirnental to ine pullic health, safety or welfare.
The topographic conditions of this site have created some
;;"y-fiift"-a".t"i"p."ti .ot=iderations, and the Planning
sta?t bel-ieves tnai a hardship would be I'mposed-upon the
;;;ii";t-ir irt" strict and l-iterar lnterpretatlon of the
zb-ning code were [o-f" enforced. The str-ict interpretati-on
;i affi r.if n"igni tirnits would, rnake it virtually inpossible-
i" i""ei" ttre site. Flndings supporting the variance are rv
A, B, C2.
The Design Review Board has reviewed this request, at- their
Jun"-e, iggo neetLng, and by a unaninous vote of 3-0 has
concepfually approv6i tfre proposal with the condLtl-on that
if a iarianire iioro ttre rnaxinui wall height fs required, that
be obtained fron lhe PEC. The soils analysLs, which were
needed to deternine the exact wall heights, were not
l.ratfiufe at the tine of the DRB review'
v.
H5
=
f
ht.
ir
,[
N\\
\
,$
\
t
T:,).t.N'.
\
t
{E
F
$
,, 1
I
JI
el
#
.!
o
=zo
ol o1,..o\.,,. o\. F\-l= \l<\O k \O rOolo o,\ '.\l6l 0oloolll.
I
Io'5rFllE'X
:l<OE.:tadz
d=
='=le
I
I
htrld,()l
.5;i
(lt ro
ItE5'oEtotzt6
tJ
ah
UJ
IIJ
lJ-
F
=
IJ.J
*rN
E
o)
TII6
.9
ct
(!
=o
F
:
Y
o
6
E(/fr3't
ESE rr-
E f,,,eJ'\ll.9- U.eAfi[
JlS-'
!€91-Ict o-cL<(5-t
;2..9{
Ai rt)i.J \J
tItlz
=o
lU1-
F
z
rLJ
uJo
=I
ll"
UJE
F
z
=
.9
at>q)It
g;
q)o
'.4
.:E.o
o
E
6
o)
F,thzzF,6E
o)
E
ooo(5
o
at
.2E
=l0
u;3(!
o
(g
o
E
6
ato
(!
.go
o
3oF
o
E]
a
q
cI
o
CL
1'
(!
.F
(!
E
;
--3>o.
Eo
o
Eq)(!
E:o-
]E
E8
-Oo_
qg
F'3;o;c)
'-o
rD(o€o(D
=E;>cP
d.E
E(!@c
ctrio':EY
.=-
O(!
dE
Eo
H(,OE
O'G
ctc-c(!-a60
og
9) (!E:E3o(0
-v=
OE
>,9
-OO9E
=e\r, E.f- o
-o
\oo\o
C.l
@
..t)
LIJull!
=
=E
u,,,o
J
F
FNO|].Vn'lVA
(,
(.,
ru€.r{q
olr
FI
(!
t+{
0,
o(
tr.r{
th
-G
=Zu-
6z
=
llJo
J
e.
UJzgJ
>g
-l(rt
=COGI
zz
Fo_ 4:< -.!:.lX=lL=anoz>.6Zu-<oo-
cv>x
-.(\i
u,lf
IJJz
=F
F
zo
tr
Jfaz
O-i
I
Fz
z
<oo<
=F8c;<z
I e.{I c'l
tlll
trz,
\Jz
-Fdo3dOI
cttlE
zo
=oo
z
tr
uJFJ
X
=auz
=.1ol
uJl
5l
<l>l
ttlol
fl
r,o
oo
o
ru
z
=tr
I
I
I
I
I
c,l
=.1ol
IJJI
5l
al>l
rLlol
=l
sOl uJFI F
olull
cEl
*|ol
zl
pl
+.to
q,
a,
z
g
t!
I
I
s-lol
zl
3l
FI
+Jo
c,o
a
o
z
=etr
I
c{!n
I
C!,rn
I
()
I'i.l{
t-
I
.lol
-l
olt{ldlI
Iu4E
4
oo
Eott.Fl
oo
Fl
at)..{
H
0,
C)
uJ
=z
d)
-)
o+,o
Ar
o
TJdrlql
F.t
FI
'Fl(s
z
tl-
co
XI
Nl
Fo
l'{loINrllNol Iol\olrlF-rlofllr
_el"l-loolc)e{lt:
Ul .AUI;E;ojl>
ao
d)
J4
o
tro
Bo
rJ)
=e.
lr-
I
flF-l
''-{ |
"-{ |
.lolzl
ctl
uJl
5l
?l>l
u-lol
zl
FI
o
ru
+,
.rl
o
IDtt
q
}.
Uo
=e.
E
9P
=(J;sfFd8
z
T
(J
uJ
=
E i\
=+(lOz
<F
uJ<zE[!F(1 Z
F
EFz
FO
uJtr
T
C)
ciz
L
=t
I.IJL
F
oz
tl-
z6
=
J(L
tr
crllt
tto:HE:E{clf60E .t)e9'o ir
Ed
=>FJF
=uli-E b=o q.- E: :o-
E 65lP 't urE X, O-f; -;;iB'ioitr-
tJl
co
F
-f
-
EE!
..i3\J \.'
=
==3'-;\ -l-
= uJ -*'i6il=ggs
*l1\l--
Lc)
-$.if
O-E/"
UU
3
ocn
o\a\o
UJ
F
o
ltj
tr
U)oo-zo
Fo-
uJY
uJ
d)
oFt
lrJ
o-
tr
oo
I
utFoz
E
=E
lrJ
o-zIF()fEFazo()
u,lo
J
E
o
of
9q
anzo(J
z
Ftt
G
i i;.b.: j
Q t . = E=:r ii E i*::3T.?i.!-2..a
"+ i = ;.2
2 ii;- z
q..z :.: : =;c!i,!L..: - 9= c
if i i r 6iE:--;=
E E; i;:niizi:E t - -.= t
! i =+ !EEIE5+
--. ?: 7 o-
.= : i 3 5 :E:: E:;
" 1J - | 7.: ,,j i : f ; 3i
xo
+Jc^
d
o\o\
co
Hr'l
rqE
ts
tI]
U)
2
A
ts
H
v
F1
o.rN
FIoFf
c)H
rn
6
U)
frl
Fl
z3
!oe
ao
U
F
F-rn.it.n
cfl
Ifi
F1
FnEl
u)
rlr&
U
f
frl
z
l-{
U)
Ft
v,H
frl
E
z
al F-ulHorD<>x
>zza<<
a:.-t
rl < !./."ri A -z"v-z=
*,alFS=q--Pa\ kJ t/- a< ,^
FTZZUAq.l \ -':
-<ts=Fa ca5eoor z3FF*rrJ<H9ir\<iiF<V
C;c<lezF!L>Z^=*<::
EsHOPFTA{ ,.'' I!
ilto>-;!4Oa>i\zr-rYv
^Hf:F
Itrro(l
FZU:ffir<EUSXH
-F-Yl
E53F
it
-rH
AIa.,tf
*fLatt
A.F
ENts
-rtsat{
aiF!aF?F
-afP
trtF
il-l
+|Fr\
EY
r+
-:€
-E|e
5)LIts+ad
*F(FL.Hfh\{:7
i{r
trl
A.rl{al-l.FrFlrlJttrlhA.o
.run?tsiir'r{iu
rir6i ''"
"US ffiSmlflES FAI ilo, 303U4335 P,01
nm0
go lthon It, t{r} csnce$u ;
I., Fodro Gcrltola, eeet,lty thet I ua ava-r of thr.fsct thaB
t,ot el, vall FstEto Fatdbl vallr obloraeo llas ln r gacloElcat
:
mnattive itGil I rn{ tnrlhlr a<ilstctrte4gr tlra! I au rwara of tbr
last thrt thc r a!, DRo9orlng. to bulld, on lpt 39 elao rlltr
ogtlcel taffiltfin !i!\Dtrthlll
: r'
I
It&ge8l,b€{ aDrf rflorn brfon ne tbl't --?gfL- dey c! -Ilue.*-, 1990,
',2 1990
4e&a,.+ ?egaz,
xotsry
i
I Project Application
o^t" 5'30:70,
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:7o / , CDrr->(',
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description,tot 27 , ancx ,r,^n l/i/ f,&2, /o"4/. , z,^" P/b
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date 6.6,70
Motion by:
Seconded by:
j-o DISAPPROVAL
Su mmary:
Town Planner
Dale:
E staft Approval
$liifuBlock / Filing Pa{+{" /hk|"'
ADORESS:
0'..lNER
ARCH I TECT
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
I NT qTTF
Hei 9ht
Total GRFA
PrimarY GRFA
SecondarY GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
l,{ater Course
Site Coverage
LandscaPi ng
Fence/ Retai ni ng
Park'ing
Credi ts: Garage
Mechani cal
Ai rl ock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: SloPe Permitted
Envi ronmental /Hazards :
ZOiIE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZOIIE DISTRICTS
one
Phone
A'l 'lotved
s(33)
15% +
21e5.t
t8s1.2
20'
l5'
W!-
6' a".l il
i eer';t{
(3oo ) (6oo )
(eoo)(1200)
(so)(1oo)
,a.i/,-i.r\[4]/\lu/
(2oo ) (4oo )
Prooosed
3j' raex.
OK
grD
{30? \
I
-frpL \>'N/a (
.\
/)
/
u/e
zatt
OK
0"? '19'v'1"/
(30)(so)
istS
'rla I I
sf
Hei ghts
frr-
lzs\
->r-
(zoo\----t-=r-
K 7"
-
S'loPe Actual
Aval anche
Flood Plain
Slo}e E,tr..Js aO ?a ,\_
l.letlands Oll
Geologic Hazards
Comnents:
Zoni ng: Approved/Di saPProved
Date:
)EatT 5lqnaEure
/
DATE I
ni \r rLl,U,ru t -""
ZONE OISTRi
PROPOSED USE
LOT SI;E
Hei ght
Totai GRFA
PrimarY GRFA
SecondarY GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
lilater Course
Site Coverage
Landscaoi ng
Fence/Retai ni ng'Jal'l
Parki ng
Credi ts: Garage
Mechani cal
Ai rl ock
Storage
Solar Heat
He i ghts
lfetl ands
Geologic
zoi.lE cHicK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZO|IE OiSTRICTS
Bl ock tri1inn l/W| | | rrrY l/ | !
A'l 'lovred
(30)(33)
AOORESS:
0",lNtR
ARCH I TECT
Pro Do s ed JJ llt 't t,-
t
,M
t4
-!...!E
47a
!t/
'i
?aqr-d
20'
l5'
1ql
(30)(3c)
-T4rf7nlN4
(3oo)(5oo)
(soo)(r2oo)
(so)(roo)
(2s ) (50 )
(2oo)(4oo)
4oq
4o
/15
/w0
Drive: slope Penn'i *ea L07a slope Actua t - 1'5/a
Envi ronmenta I /Hazards :Aval anche
Flood P'lain
Sl ope
Hazards
Corments:
Zoni ng: Approved/Dl sapProved
Date:
)Eatt 5lgnature
7 -.-'/.-7 pfulqo
NN'IE OF PRq'ECTS
LEGAI,, DESCRIPTION:
STRSET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTI
SUBDIVISION
I
LIST OF I,TATERIAI,S
The follor.rlno
Review Board
A. BUILDING
lnformation '1s
before a flnal
IATERIALS:
requlred
approval
TYPE OF
for subnlttal
can be glven:
I'IATERIAL
to the Deelgn
ouantltv S{,ze*ft A?ALl'f _La+t,+-/.W_zry b'_TT.
Roof
Sidlng
Other l{aII l{atertals
Fascla
Sofflts
Wlndows
Window Trln
Doora
Door Srin
Hand or Deck Ralls
FIueg
Flashlnge
Chlnneys
lragh Enclosures
Greenhouses
Qther
B. IANDSCAPING: Nane of De
PI"A}IT I{ATERIAI,S:
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
MTrl 7 22q,,
* f nd lcate for deciduous trees.
s igner:
Phone:
trees.
cal lper
I nd i cate
sNowDoN & HoPKrNs o*lrr.r,
201 Gore Creek Drive
vArL, coLoRADO 81657
LETTil @F TRANSMITTAL
"*' 1/-J0N/t l4?0 l'"" ""' '
A''ENTION
FE Mpt4ilA 44wrt(303) 476-220r
l,U[k uot,' ,t(t
fNU ry
> wE ARE SENDING vou ! Attachsd tr Under separate cover via the following items:
,/! Shop drawings F Prints D Plans E Samples tr SPecitications
! Copy of letter I Change order tr
coPrEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
4 /z//tl4o /,6/ * Uf/ffi*ln
I hb/ao €v(//46D 4#r Ll ,11 -A4
I /t'//o l4o #r///aL/>/-,/ ,A/ ,40,727
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval\/R For your use
I
D Approved as submitted tr Resubmit-copies for approval
C Approved as noted D Submit
-copies
for distribution
E Returned for corrections E Retu rn
-
corrected prints
19- D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
E For review and comment tr
tr FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGNED:
PnoqJcr?.sz /mt |r., c|rej, ra. owl t, .nclorut.r... tot rr noa.d, kLrdly Dotity o. .t onca.
Nlcholas Lamplrls, Ph,D.
coNSULTtNC OEOLOO|ST
0793 VALLEY ROAD
CARBONDAL€, @LORADO 81023
(s3lec3.itto& ]rotJit]
l,li]y :.i;(.r t l..l''ltli
Fedr- Uer-i snI;rc,/t: Sin*r.iCnn [r I i::l:i 1.,::i. rrrr,, /1r-i::.fr:i. {.;.*r:i:: it;
iilt):L {icrre fir-nnl: i.Jr- r vr.:.Vail,, E{"-r ,, Pt&,;r;r
FlHn l.,.ctt 1i1$r fiin{:!r i.,. \tai,.!. lintat:*m [::'atr::lh
Il) tit +:l t." lvlr" . {,lrilr*:i r; t:r ll. n I
l. fi .,r ',' lr rJ ctr r: :i. d e d rrr { 1; r:r r- r'1 ii,i \,/
F ]irr". Isl is ci t::
haz.-:rv"rl* arct typi r::"-r ll. 1v
/\ {:. tlrr+ to!: $.f {:. }-r ft e.l {:i)F-r
rea(:h. l lrn l{tt il; *t*;lsip
that s j, f.e r+p*:r: i .f i i: s*i l. Fi
d firlii :i. fl n i, :; ver y :i mt:r flr t en .L
thm rveri"al. I de*inri"
t h i,,; ilcii:ii"lr;j. f" r,.:r cirr [.,,
'[:lr* top i:r'i E.h'* r'i:rc1,.:4.rI. J rcnr,.r l,lt i r:rr i-.
rrr:i.rti fti.l "t .tfty,rcry,
tr.tlier* .rr:lt i:: L irfr '!: fli i:rr..r:r .l r:i . r'i:rr !ls i:annot
{:rr} ;ht:! s utl-r s:l,clr; c.{: t:hf3 pr pe}i-ty so
i rrvclsti tlit L i. {::rl { lr- Drr:iper .f *urrdi:itiorr
,, {$i. t:r'l clrgt:i r-!,rG fi.l !:ilt$L.t1rl b r.:.. p.:rr.t of
ll'l+rn thc.rr.rr.:th tlrc: '.;.r !: E' i.:r.,
i gii n f,..(:: !t$,li.tr," .; t r) :,,i !:
lrei. i s:r.o i. t
{i)Vrfrll" I r:l .n f ii}
t" h + ri i r {:: r,lri l; :i. .:.r L
{J(},,4n thn ::! l. r.}F} i:
,f l i r' I.r it r,l t- *i t..t iil ,:l t. i.
tiit r:rr r,l. rJ llrit li,tr I,tr,.l"1
'i: tl:l' r' t:)t:, lr:fli, lt t::1 r. l't 1:1
t .::r *: ii r:r iiji$( r t. !r ,,
{:rtr1:;! r
fjl..lr." I i'r lt i: i:)ft ,,;1.: r" i.,r {-- t :i. n rI
,.::l :i. {ril titlfif '-r ,.ritiil t.::ilLt1Ii:ld
f) l. *it,i,t.|ii6l c r..!l.' l:.'irr-: L rr, r,: i. {
l: c:' nr ri, rr i.
t-l t- i:r I
tllerr"e
/ni I Er
|,
{nf'(ir
1..i:i ni: eurr".I 'y ofl,Ua-,r,d
N:i c:hn.[ a+:ii [."amD i. r- i. :::
mn+ilrl f-i rrg SenI oi: j. s;l:
TO
sNowDoN & HoPKrNs otl,rr.r,
201 Gore Creek Drive
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
,
LETTT @F TRANSNNI]TTAL
! Plans tr Samples E Specifications
> WE ARE SENDING YOU j{ Attached E Under separate cover via
tr Shop drawings
R Copy of letter
S. Prints
E Change order tr
coPtEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
r/,P/f /'h)J ilt fi"L,4//u'/ /'t4a ,fuiltht lizl/ >
it r / >i/q,/t,h.!a/ ff,artn fAftr't4:4 ft7*l i.71zn hiht e
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval tr Approved as submitted
\--{ For your use tr Approved as noted
B As requested I Returned for corrections
! For review and comment
! FOR BIDS DUE
Resubmit-copies for approval
Submit
-copies
for distribution
R€tu rn
-corrected
prints
tr
D
D
19- tr PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
/SIGNED:
Pioorcl2ao? /ffi7r|r, erb. ts olal.lt aacroaurtt ,ta aot ,a nota4 klndrl, notltt t a ,t onca.
qe-Trr *e
May 28, 1990
Town of Vail Building Department
75 South Frontage Road WestVail, Colorado 81657
U. S.A.
Attention: Mr. Mike MolLica
Dear Mike:
In regard to the chain link safety fence
you have given us approvaL to p1-ace across
Lot 29, in VaiL Potato Patch, I would like
to nake the following guarantees:
A. The fence wiLl be painted dark green
to blend in with the landscaPing.
We will Ternove the fence as soon as
our backfilL and final grading work
is conplete. This shoul<l be conple-
ted no later than July 5Lst'
erely,
O
I HTER.DEPARTI.IENTAL REV I E}I
PROJECT:
DATE SUSI,IITTED:
COI.'d4ENTS }IEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
POLICE DEPARTI4ENT
DATE OF PUELIC HEARING 5,3O,70
/1/e - K*5,'/o".g
Jun
u,d-+ 1n-{1,< r/;L)'e-n
1) Zu+. *'n*l o -pl^;l( ttL
Revlewed by:
Comnerrts:
Date
,
I
',:.t,
..: ji
RECPEATIOlI DTPARTI.IENT
Revle'.red by:
Comrents:
..!
/
Com:r,ents:
Da te
DRE IPPTJICAIIION
DATE APPLTCATION RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
*****THrs APPLTCATTON wrLIJ Nor BE ACCEPTED uNTrrJ ALr, rNFoRuATroNIS SUBMITTED*i***
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-appl.ication neetlng with a planninE staff Deurber isstrongly. suggested to deternine if any additionallnfonration is needeid. Ns application wi]I be acceoted
It Is the applicantrsresponsibitlty to nake an appointnent wLttr ttre staff, to f,indout about addlt,ional submitt,al requirenents. please notethat a COMPLETE application wiII streanline the approvalprocess for your proJect by decreaslng the nurnler- bfcondltlons of approvat thal the DRB miy stiputate. ALLconflltlons.of approval must be resolved before a buildingpernlt Is lssued. Application wlll not be processedwlthout Ownerts Slgnature.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
B.IOCAEION
AddreEs
OF PROPOSAL:
Iegal Description
Subdivlsion
c.NN,IE OF APPLICANT:
Maillng Address:
Phone
D. NN'TE OF APPLICANT'S
I'taIIlng Address:
NN'TE OF OWNERS:
8ICNATURE (8) I
Condonlniun Approval if app1lcable.
Phone 4- -ttn{
4a
F.
G.DRB FEE: The.fbe will be paid at the tlne a buildinqperrnlt is paid for.
EEE
$ ro. ooI zs. oo
$ 50. oo
9100. 00
$200. 00
s300. 00
VALUATION
$ o-
$ 10,001 -I 50,001 -
$150r 001 -
s500,001 -I over
s 10, 000s 50, oooI 150,000$ 5oo, ooo
91, 000, 000
91, ooo, ooo
Zonlng
REPRESENTATIVE:
I'taiLing Address:
Phone
(0vER)
PI.AIIT IdATERIAI,S:
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXISTTNG SHRUBS
TO BE REI,TOVED
*Indicate slze5 qallon.
Botanical Name Comnon Nane OuantLtv Size*
of proposed Ehrubs.
,lt'r'ttry (^!"'!'yg
^ l)trltfrr 4r _gan
F €r ', 4p. l,t,t/.t^r 4opth 4p, /r, ' ,( f.?( /f
_%L
-L b+L
GROUND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR UETHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c.orHER ra{DscApE FEATURE' (retainlng walrs, fences, swrmrnlngpools, etc. ) pl.ease. speciry. inai6ai"-;;is;;;';i retarninswall's. Maximun height-or witri wrtnin the front eetback rs
i"tE"l;"aMaximun helshr or waits etsewneii on-lrr"' property
BEt-K $HSSU trilr .3uJy4,ld55s ,.U0,90 12:27 No,uu-i ,.-_
uTf,LrqI LocArlQIi, vEgrFrcArroN
FII,ING I
The locatlon ot ut,llltleeT whether they be ualn tnrnk llnee orplgPgsgd rlnee, lust be approved.and vlrlfied by the forrowingutllttiea for the accourpairying site plan.
Authollzed Slgr0ature
sUBDIVISION
,tOB NN,IE
:.rlr-- /4 Blpcx
ADDRESS
U,5. lfest Coununlcatione
1-800-9 2 2-198?tl68-6860 or 9{9-4530
Pttbltc Senrlge Cqnpanv949-57AL///,Cefq/Q'
cary HaII //v
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
9{ 9-589 2
Ted Huslcy/Mlchael Laverty
Herltage CablevlBlon T.v.
94 9 -553 9€r*y.JetrrsonS'r'au€ /va'rr
Upper Eagla VaIIey water
& 9anltatlon Dietrlct r
tl?6-7480
Frrd Haelee
NOTE S
-f tr- qa
contractor ofcutut penrlt frl{orke and tolt fron
in any publicvatl. A. A Btreet
obtalnlng Upper Eagle Valley
\,-qil\\^*ftr..
These verlficatlons do not relleve thehie responsibility to obtain a Etreet,the Town of vaj, If Depargnent of publlc
W.?efpfe sisqinqright-of-rday or easenent in-€he Tar{n-or
cut permit Dust be obtained separiatlf
ThiE fo::ur is to veri,fvIocatlon. This ehou}bpreparing your utilityinstallations.
r Please brlng a glte plan whenWater I Santtatton elgnatures.
eerr.flce availablllty andbe ueed in conJunctlon wlthplan and schadullng
7
LAND "I"
April 24, 1990
Our Order: VL5137-3
BUYER/OWNERS
LARCH, S.A., A
SELL,ER:
ADDRESS:
CIOSER
SLIFER, SMITTI AND FRAMPTON
DRAWER 2820
BEAVER CREEK, CO 8L620
1 Attn: JAN iTOHNSON
SLIFER, SMITH AND FRAMPTON
DELTVER TN AVON RT'NS
Attn; DON GAI.,,GAN
E RANGE PROPERTIES
VAII-, RUNSLI\TER IN
GUARANTEE OMPAN
Representing Tltle Insurance Company of Minnesota
THANK YOU FOR YOI'R ORDER
cffit%uk ?tqDuNu
PANAI{ANIAN CORPONATION
ANJA, INC., A COL,,ORADO CORPORATION
Attn: SHARI{,AN
845-9400
Attn: JOHN SLEVIN
LAND r11" cuARANTEE Oo"pANy
Representing Title Insurance Company of Minnesota
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER
GORE RANGE PROPERTIES
DELIVER IN VAII, RUNS
1 Attn: JANICE CIAITPA-BAUER
COPIES
1 Attn:
rRED OTTO
DELIVER IN AVON RUNS
1 Attn:
PICKED UP FOR DEIJIVERY Al,I PI,I
roR TITIJE QUESTIONS CALL KARSN HORTH 3O3 476-225L
FOR CL,oSING QUESTIONS CALL SHARIiIAN K. GREEN 3O3 476-22sL
Gommitment To Insure
lssued through the 0ffie of:
5440 Ward Road
Suite 200
Arvada, CO 80002
420-0241
3300 So Parker Rd., Suite 105
Aurora, €O 80014
75 t -4336
2425 Canyon Blvd.
Suile 230
Boulder, CO 80302
444-4101
200 North Ridge
P.O. Box 2880
Breckenridge, CO 80424
453-2255
5 I 2 Wilcox
Casile Rock, CO 80104
688-6363
102 South Teion
Suile 100
Coloqado Springs, CO 80903
634-4821
MINNESOTA
TITLE A '108 Soulh Fronrage Road W.
P.O. Box 357
Vail, CO 8l 657
476-2251
710 Kipling Streef
Suite 202
Lakewood, CO 8021 5
2 32-3 | I I
3609 So. Wadsworth
Suire I l5
Lakewood, CO 80235
988-8550
19590 East Main Street
Suile 105
Parker, CO 8O134
84r-4900
P.O. Box 5440
Denver, CO 80217
32r-t880
8821 E. Hampden
JU ITE I UU
Denver, CO 80231
7 50-4223
910 | Harla n
Suiie 100
Westminsler, CO 80030
427-93s3
| 201 Main Avenue
Durango, CO 8l 301
247-5860
7700 E. Arapahoe Rd.
JU ITE I5U
Englewood, CO 801l2
770-9596
3600 So. Yosemile
Suiie 255
Denver, CO 80237
694-2837
108 Soulh Fronlage Road W.
P.O. Box 352
Vail, CO 81658
476-2251
7700 E. Arapahoe Road
Suite 150
Englewood, CO 80112
770-9596
COfUPANY
,rt*r;ftry a z89Z r,urot t/Ita
fuoEuAtS pozuoqtnv
VL0SlNNll l l0 ANVd1,I0C lSNVUnSNl lllll
fuoleubrs pazuoqlne laqlo lo Jactgo 0uneprqen e lq
paubrsralunoc uaqm prleA aq ol'V alnpaqcs ur umoqs alep aql uo s.lacrjJo pazuoqlnE Alnp s1 Aq pax4;e olunaraq aq ol leas pue aueu
alerodroc slr pasnec seq elosauury\l ;o Aueduo3 acuernsul ap-1 tglUlHM SSlNl.lM Nl'luaulrururo3 srql Aq palalor uoaraql a6e6your ro lsaralur Jo alelsa aql anlen rol prooat Io
sarrnbce parnsur pasodord aql olep aql olroud 1nq loe:aq alep anrlca$a aq1 olluanbasqns 0urqce11e:o sp:orar cr;qnd eql ur 6uueadde
]sJU'paleaio 'Aup I'sraueu.laq]0 ro suirelc asra^pe'sacueJquJncua'suarl 'slcalao g
'spocar crlqnd aql Aq unnoqs lou pue Mel Aq pasodtur
'paqsruJnJ raUsaJaq Jo aJololaraq] leualeu r0 roqel 'saJrAJas.,ro, 'uarl e o11qbr.r.ro 'uar1 Auy tr'splocar crlqnd aq1 Aq umoqs 1ou are qcrqM pue asolesrp plnorn sasrua:d aql ro uorlcodsur pue Aaruns lcaroc e qctqM
s1cel Aue pue'sluaurqcporoua'eare ur aEeyoqs'saur; fuepunoq ur slcrljuoo'sercueda:csrg g
'sprocar crlqnd aql Aq umoqs lou 'sluauasea lo surslc ro 'sluauasel 'Z
'sprocar cr;qnd aqt Aq umoqs 1ou uorssassod ut satyed 1o surelc ro srq6lu 1
6uttvto;101 aql ol lcolqns osle sr luau1urrttoC slqt'ol parrolar a^oqe a0erano3
urorl suorsnlcxl pue suorle;ndr1g pue suorupuo3 aql ur paureluoc sraueui aql ol uourpps ul
SNOIId]3X] OUVONV]S
luaurlruJuroC srqt lo suotstlold aql ol Falqns ate pue
uo poseq aq ]snur luaulrurr.!03 srq1,{q pararor uoaraq a8ebuou aql }o snpls aql ro }saralur rc ale}sa ag ot al}tl aq} }0 snl4s ag jo uo Dursue Aueduro3
oql ]surp0e 0uuq Aeu ro a,req leu parnsul pasodod aq1 1eq uope io s1q0u ro suorpe ro uorpe Auy y
'urataq pa4rpor.l Alssatdxa
se ]dacxa luaultuttttoJ srql ]o led e apeur pue aiuaralat Aq paletodorut &aiaq are qcrq A parnsu; pasodord e\g 10 Jolel ut Jol poututuoc sarcr;od ro l(crlod
1o tuol aqt 1o a0era^o3 uo4 suorsnlcxa aql pue suo[elnd[S pue suorlrpum aq1 pue suorsraord Euunsur atp ol palqns s! AUI!qe!l qcns pue 1gl pauulrxoo
satorlod lo futlod aql r0] V alnpaws ur patpls }unouJe aql paasxa Alrlqerl qrns lleqs tua^a ou ul luaurlruuro3 srr4 r{q pata^oc uoarar4 a0e6your ro lsatalur ro
a1e}saaq}a}eal3]oa.]lnb3eol(3)lo,8a|npaq3Sutuivtoqssuot1dacxaateu|uJ||aol|q)Jo}oalaqstuauJal|nbalarpq1rairA1duocot(e)\q|elpoo0Ul0rirl;e1apn
ur uoaraq acuerlar ur paJnrur ssol ;enpe ro; r(|uo pue Jo] pauururos satcrlod ro rirrlod p uro] aql ut pajnsul lo uo!l!ullap aql lopun pepnlcur saryed
qcns pue pa.rnsul pasodord paueu aqt ot r(luo aq lleqs luaurtruruJo3 srql rapun r(ueduiq aq1 lo {rpqerl g
'suor1elndr19 pue suotltpuo3 asoql p t qdel0eted ol luensind palnrur
i\1snotrrald,!t1tqet1uLol1i\ueduiu3aq}a^a||a]loUl|eqstu3tllpuaueqcns1nq,r(10U|pJoc3e}UaUl|Uul{s|q}]08a1npaqc5puarr,reAetuol1fs1l1eAueduq
aq] laueu a$o r0 urels asra^pe 'acuerquncua 'uarl 'palap qJns Aue p a6payvroul ;enpe sarrnbce asrrrrer4o Auedual eq1lr to i\ueduq aq o1 a0papraoul
qJns asol3srp lleqs parnsul pasodord aq 11 aopawroul qrns asopsrp os ol parnsu; pasodord aq 1o arnlel Aq pacrpnlatd sr Aueduro3 ag luaua aq ol uoalaq
a3Ue|laJlope^ueulo{0u|{nsala6eUepJosso|Auelo1,(lt1lqet;ulolJpo^at|aJaq11eqslueduqaql,0u|l|J/t^u|lueduo3at4ola0pe1oulq0nsoso|0slpol
lre] lleqs pue Joaraq B alnpaqcs ur u/v\or.ls aso$ ueql raq]o luauJlrururo3 stql lq paranoo uoaraq a0e6yor.u ro lsalalut lo aleFo aq ourpage regeu taqlo ro
ulelc asra pe 'aJuerqurncua 'uarl 'l3aFp Aue lo a6palmou1 ;en1ce sarrnhe ro seq poinsul pasodord aq 11 7'luaunrpur Alunoas raq]o ro 'peap ]sru] 'lsru] ]0 paap apnlJUr lleqs 'uraraq pasn uaqm ',,abeby0r!,, u.xal aqf I
SNOIIfl Nd[S ONV SNOI]IONOS
Aue0u03 aql l0 llnel aq ]0u sr sarsrlod
r0 rirlod qcns anssr ol alnlrel aq] ]eq] papr^oJd'srnmo ]srl rolaqorq A'anssr lleqs r0l paprullrol sarcrlod l0
&rlod aql uaqM r0 ]oaraq alep a rp€lla aq] JaUe sqluour xrs aleurulla] pue asea3 lleqs rapunaaq suo4eor;qo
pup li11lnql llp pue muelnsur al1l Jo sorcrtod ro
^olod
qcns Jo eJuenssr eq1 o1 fueururtatd st Uou4tuuloC strll
luauasiopua luanbasqns iq J0 luaulrr.uuJo3 stql }0 acuensst aq} p
aurl aq] ]e iaqua
^ueduo3
aql & loaiaq V alnpaqcs ur pauasur uaaq a eq rol paururlloc sarcrlod to ,(r|lod
aul l0 lunoue aql pue palnsul pasodod aqt 1o Atrtuapt aql uaq/\^ Auo a^ttJa$a aq lleqs luaurllrlruro3 slql
losisq
suolelndrls pue suorlrpuo3 aql ot pue B pue V salnpaqos ]o suorsnotd aq ol patqns 11e :topreql safueqc
pue sllnrua.rd aql Jo luauled uodn 'V alnpaqcs ur ol pallaF] to paquJsap puel aql ur Aqataq patairog ]salalul
lo alelsa aql ]o aa6e0uour ro raurno se 'V alnpaqrs ut pauleu patnsul pasodotd eql;o to,rel ut 'V alnpaqJs
ur parlrluapr se 'aouelnsut aprl ;o sarcrlod to ,(rrlod slr anssr o1 slruuo Aqaraq 'uoUejaptsuol alqenleA
e r0+
^ueduro3
a$ pallm uraraq 'uorlerodioc elosauuly\ e 'VIoSlNNly! l0 ANVdI/!0C IJNVUnSNI lllll
^au 016 L -luau4lxrxo3 vI]v
+--.. '1 ,rrY; ." ;\ ../ .,'t.i
'l
Vi'*,
oJnsul ol luourllluutoS
VTOSsNNIW
Ar,rO"o!,rurrMENr
SCHEDULE A
- Charges -ALTA Olsner Policy
Tax Certif.
--TOTAL--
I{ith your remittance please
Application No. V151-37-3
For Information OnIyI'T 29 VAIL POTATO PATCH
$4e9. O0
$2 o. oo
$s19. Oo
refer to Vl-5L37-3.
1.
2.
Effective Date: Aprll 16, 1990 at 8:oo A.M.
Policy to be issued, and propoEed Insured.:
frALTArr Ownerrs policy i2so,Ooo.ooForn 8-1970 (Anended 1O-17-ZO)
The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to inthis Connltrnent and covered hereln is:
A Fee Sinple
Title to the estate or interest covered. herein is at theeffective date hereof vested in:
ANJA, rNC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
The land referred to in this conmitment is described asfollows:
COI'NTY oF E,AGLE, STATE OF
ORDING TO TI{E RECORDED
COIORADO.
3.
4.
5.
Proposed Insured:
PAGE
ALr^l"oMMrrMENr
SCHEDULE B-].
(Requirenents)Application No.vt_51-37-3
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
1. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors ofthe full consideration for the estate or interest to be-insured.
2. Proper instruurent(s) creating the estate or interest to beinsured rnust be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit:
3. RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED March 07, L988, FROM ANJA, INC., A COIpRADO
CORPORATION TO THE PUBIJIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COI'NTY FOR THE USE OF FIRSTBANKoF VAIL To SECURE THE sUM oF $L4o,ooo.oo RECoRDED April 01, 1988, IN BooK481 AT PAGE 514.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDEDApril 0L, 1988, IN BOOK 481 AT pAcE 5l_5.
EVTDENCE SATTSFACTORY TO r,AND TrTLE GUARANTEE COMPANY THAT LARCH, S.A. rS APANAIT{,ANTAN CORPORATIoN.
CERTIFIED coPY oF RESOLUTION oF THE GOVERNING BoARD oF IJARCH, s.A., APANAITTANIAN CORPORATTON, (AUTHoRIZING THE ExEcUTIoN oF THE NEcEssARYDOCI]I'{ENTS). SAID RESOLUTION MUST BE PROPERLY CERTIFIED BY AN OFFICER OF THECORPORATION WITH THE CORPORATE SEAL AFFIXED. SAID RESOLUTION MUST BESUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY I,AND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY BUT NEED NOT BERECORDED.
EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS ANDPROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF VATL TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
CERTIFICATE OF SATTSFACTION ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF DTSTRICT COURT OF.TUDGI,TENT IN FAVOR OF STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMEN? OF REVENUE AGAINST FRANKDALESSTO IN THE AI{OIINT OF $2,5LO.72 PLUS cOURT cOSTS ENTERED oN Augusr 18,1986' TRANSCRTPT oF wHrcH wAs RECORDED December 3l-, l-996, rN BooK 4s5 ATPAGE 89' CfVfL ACTION NO. 85 CV 626, DfSTRTCT COURT rN AND FOR THE cOUNTyOF EAGI,E.
WARRANTY DEED FROM ANJA, rNc., A coroRADo coRPoRATroN To r.,ARcH, s.A., APANAI,TANIAN CORPORATION CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE .IOTNT RESOLUTION AND NOTICE OF ENCIJMBRANCEOF UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED SANITATTON DISTRICT AND VATL VALIJEYcoNsoLrDATED WATER DTSTRTCT RECORDED JANUARY L8, L99O rN BOOK 521_ AT PAGE44L.
5.
6.
7.
8.
PAGE
ALr"l"oMMrrMENr
SCHEDUL,E B-2
(Exceptions) Application No. VIil-37-3
The poricy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to thefolrowing unless the sarne are disposed of to the satisfaction ofttre Company:
L. standard Exceptions l- through 5 printed on the cover sheet.
5. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and specialaEsessments not yet certifled to the Treasurerrs office.
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land.
8. I-,iens for unpaid water and sewer charg'es, if any.
9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THEUNITED SEATES AS RESERVED IN UNIEED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13 , Lg3g,IN BOOK 123 AT PAGE 6]-7.
10. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHTCH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTERcLAUsE, BUT oMITTfNc REsTRfcTIoNs, IF ANY, BASED oN RACE, coloR, RELIGION,OR NATIONAL ORIGIN' AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED l{arch 05, L974, II{BOOK 233 AT PAGE 628 AND AS AI,IENDED IN INSTRWENT RECORDED Septernber 24,L975, IN BOOK 24L AT PAGE 950.
11. UTILITY EASEMENT THIRTY FEET IN WIDTH ALONG THE SOUIHERLY LOT IJINE OFsu&TEcT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL/POTATO PATCH.
].2. EASEI{ENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRTCTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THERECORDED PLAT OF VAIL/POTATO PATCH.
L3' TERMS, CONDITToNS AND PROVTSIoNS oF THE iTOINT RESOLUTTON AND NOTICE OFENCIDIBRANCE OF UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED SANITATION DISTRICT AND VATLVALLEY CONSOLTDATED WATER DTSTRTCT RECORDED JANUARY L8, 1990 rN BOOK 521 ATPAGE 441.
NorE: uPoN EVTDENcE sATrsFAcroRv ro rHE coMpANy IHAT sArD ENcuMBRANcE HAsBEEN pArD IN FULL, SArD EXCEPTION WILL BE DELETED.
PAGE 3
o
DATE: JAN 9. 1991
LEGAL: LOT
ADDRESS:POTATO PA
OWNER:
ARCHITECT:
29 BLOCK 1 FILING VAIL POTATO PATCH
CERISOLA RBSIDENCE pnorue *
SNOWDEN & HOPKINS PHONE #
29,0 97.0 (5.0)0.0 (15.0)0.0
UNIT ONE
796.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,0
I sTt :, FLOOR::SQ-FJ::,,2,254,0 0.0 250.0 105.0 110.0 0.0 21.0
2ND. FLOOR SQ.FT,2,33't.O 571 .0 25.0 0.0 94.0 65.0 34.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
)R.so,:F[;::,r:0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
:,1;290.0,,CREDIT
TOTALS
r03.0 ,204.0 :50.0::
0.0 29.0 97.0 (s.0)0.0 (15.0)0.0
0.0
GRFA USEO,'. .!, ..r ,:, r:4,091.0
(4,091.0)
Town of Vail
Conmunity Development
75 South Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 8L657(303) 479-2t38
Plan review based onthe 1988 Uniform BuiLding Code
Project Nunber: 1.991
Address: Lot 29, Block 1, Vail potato ptch
Occupancy: R3rM1
Tlpe of Const: V-N
Name: Cerisola Residence
Date: January 9, L99LContractor; Beck and Assoc.Architect: Snowden c Hopkins
Plans Examiner: !.IICHAEL I|HIBAKER
Portions of the rnaterial contained in this program are reproduced from theUnifonn Building code ( 1988 edition) with pernission of International
Conference of Building Officials
SHEET IDENTIFTCATION CORRECTION REQUTRED
****
2 A-10
3 A-10
****
****
Vent
Access
****
AlI electrical work to be conpJ-ete to the
reguirenents of the 1987 NationaL Electrical Code.
Provide attic ventilation that complies with section
3205. (c)
Provide an attic access (22X3O nin) to each atticarea.-- Sec. 3205. (a)
This project will reguire a site improvement survey.
Such survey sha11 be subnitted and staff approvedprior to a request for frame inspection.
Areas delineated as crawl spaces or nonhabit.
basemnt. shaIl have less than 5r lrt. from earth tostructural floor/ceiling above, a dirt floor only,
be ventilated as per UBC 2516, with access nin. sizeas per UBC 2515 and maximum access size 9 sq. ft.
Snoke detectors shall be located outside eachsleeping area. A detector shall be located on eachlevel and in the basenent. Detectors shall be
interconnected and sound an alarn audible in aILsleeping areas of the dwelling unit. UBc 1210.
Only one wood burning fireplace may be installed per
dwelling unit within the Town of Vail . Gas
appliances with trBtr vents only are not restricted
under this regulation.
********
6 A-2,3,4 Srnoke Dtr
7 A-2 13 r4 one wood
8 A-4 Skylights Materials for sloped glazing (skylights) shall be
tempered over laminate or as specified in UBC34O2r3,4. Plastic skylights shall be as per UBC5207. Curbs for skylights nay be required depending
on glazing material , slope of roof, and flashing
used.
A bathroorn is reguired to have an openable window or
a nechanical venfilation system. -- Sec. 1205. (c)
In bathroons with a tub or shower and in laundry
rooms a mechanical ventilation system connecteddirectly to the outside shall be provided. Bathrms
which contain only a water closet or lav. nay beventilated with a recirculating fan. UBC 1205(c).
Dornestic clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall beinstalled as per Irl{C 1104 and 1903. Flexible duct
connectors may not exceed 6r in length and shall not
be concealed within construction. Ducts shall
tenninate outside tbe building and not exceed 14 I
length.
In buiLdings of unusually tight construction (all
new construction within the Town of Vail),
conbustion air sha1l be obtained from the outside.
Such courb. air openings shall be as per ltl,lC Ch. 6
Factory-built chinneys for fireplaces shall
terminate a ninimun of 2t above any point withln 10thorizontally away. tl,IC 9L2.
A chinney enclosure for a lrood burning fireplaceflue sha1l be protected by a one-hour fire resistive
construction. UBC L706. This involves lining theinside of such chase with 5/8n [lpe X sheetrock andfire-taping joints.
Gas fi.replace appliances are required to beinstalled as per listing installation instructions -with a trBr vent only. Conbustion air must be
supplied from the outside for all new constructionin the Town of Vail.
Furnaces not listed for closet or alcoveinstallation shall be installed in a room or space
having a volume at least 12 tines the voluroe of thefurnace. A boiler unit will require a space 15
tirnes larger than the boiler. IIMC 504 (b)
Supply a nechanical drawing indicating design of
system, size (BTU and volurne) of equipurent, vent
location and tennination, and combustion air to be
supplied.
g A-2,3,4
10 A-3
flout opgs
Laundry
11 A-3 Laundry
12 A-3 Mech Room
13 A-6 Chimney
14 A-3r4 Enclose
L5 A-2,3 Gas ApI .
16 A-3 Mech Room
17 ****Provide
I
LB A-2r3r4 A1I Due to Colorado State Statutes, as sink faucetts and
shower heads are required to utilize flowrestrictors. Also, the naxinum water closet flush
usage is 1.5 gallons per flush.
19 A-4 Custom The custom buiLt (unlisted) fireplace must beinstalled as per IIMC Table #5-A for clearances and
uBc Ch. 3'7 for hearth and uantel size and location.
20 A- ALl stairs A handrail is required along a stainray. It ls
reguired to be 34 to 38 inches above the nosing ofthe steps and if the side is open, the maximun sizeof an opening in the railing at the staimay is 5
inches. -- Sec. 3305.(j) & 1711.
21 A- Guard rail A 36 inch high guardrail with a maximun opening of 6
inches is reguied where step is greater than 30
inches to floor or grade below. -- sec. 1711.
22 A-2r3 Under strs The enclosed usable space under the stairs is
required to be protected by thr fire-resistive
construction. -- 3306. (ro)
23 A-6 **** Unless the lower Level is clearJ.y strown as a
basement (6r or less frou floor above to grade for
50* of building perirneter), a 3 level dwelling willrequire 2 means of exiting from the 3rd. level if3rd. level exceeds 500 sq. ft. UBC 420 & UBC
33o3 (a) .
24 **** Provide A one-line eLectrical drawing for each level is
reguired for this project.
25 **t r. Provide rnclude a copy of the soils report for the site to
be buil-t on. -- Sec. 290s. (b) & (c)
Town of Vail
Conmunlty Developnent75 South Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81557(303) 479-2L38
Plan analysis based onthe 1988 Uniform Building Code
Project Nunber: 1991Address: I.ot 29, Block 1, Vail potato ptch
Occupancy: R3rMl
Type of Const: V-N
Name: Cerisola Residence
Date: January 9, 1991Contractor: Beck and Assoc.Architect: Snowden & Hopkins
Engineer:
Plans Examiner: IIICHAEIJ WHITAKER
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a courpletelisting_of all possible code reguirenEnts in the 1988 UBc. ft is a guiie toselected sections of the code.
Portions of the naterial contained ln this program are reproduced fron theUniforn auilding Code ( 1988 edition) with perrnission of -tnternational
Conference of Building Officials
AREA I{IN.LTGHT MIN.VENT NO.EXTTS EGRESS
2 Living.Kitch,DinrLib2 Powder bath room2 Air lock2 carage2 Storage rooms2 Hal1s, closets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FIOOR1 l,Iaster bedroom1 l.laster bath1 Bedroon #21 Bath room #3L Bedroom #31 Bath room #4L Laundry room1 Mechanical Room1 Storage Rooms1 HaIIs, closets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FIOORB Bedroom #4B Family roonB Bath room #5B Storage roomB Halls, closets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FISOR
BUILDING TOTAL
L305
40
55
57L
25
325
233L
32L
L01
288
64
26L
70
91.
105
250
703
2254
278
289
73
28
L28
796
4585
130.50
0.00
0.00
o. oo
o. o0
o. oo
32. 10
0. 00
28.80
o. oo
25. L0
o. oo
0. oo
0.00
0. oo
o. oo
27.80
28.90
0.00
0. 00
o. oo
65.25
2.OO
3.25
0. 00
o. 00
0. oo
16. 05
5. 05
L4.40
3.20
l_3. 05
3.50
4.55
0. 00
0.00
0.00
t_3.90
L4.45
3.65
o. 00
0.00
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
1
1
L
1
1
t
t
LI
l-
1I
1
L
1
1
l_
1
1I
LI
1
L
2
FOOTNOTES !L) EGRESS - An operable window or door that opens directly to the exterioris required from this roon. The minLmum clear openable area nust meetthe following. -- Sec. L2O4.1) The rninimum clear height is 24 inches2) The rninimum clear width is 20 j.nches
3) The minimurn clear area is 5.7 square4) The maximurn sill height is 44 inches2) The nurnber of exits is based on Table 33-A3) A rnechanical ventilation system nay be used
openings for ventilation. -- Sec. 1205. (c)4) The requirement for an egress wlndow in the
Sec. 1204.
feet
(Dwellings)in in lieu of exterior
basement is based on
ROOM DIIi{ENSIONS:
Habitable space shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet 5inches. Kitchens, ha1ls, bathrooms and toilet compartments rnay have aceiling height of 7 feet measured to the lowest projection. If the ceilingis sloping, then the nininun height is required in only L/2 of the area.
--sec. 1207. (a)
Every dwelling unit shall have at least one room which has not less than 120
square feet of floor area. Other habitable rooms except kitchens shall have
an area of not less than 70 square feet. -- Sec. L2O7. (b,
Habitable rooms other than a kitchen sha11 not be less than 7 feet in anydimension. -- Sec. L2O7. (c)
GI,AZTNG REQUIREMENTS:1) Aft glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safetyglazing material . -- Sec. 5406. (d)2) Note windows and doors in a tub or shower area are reguired to besafety glazed regardless of the height above the floor. -- 5406(d) 5.
SUOKE DETECTOR REQUIREIIIENTS:
A snoke detector is reguired on the ceiling or wall at a point centrallylocated in the corridor or area giving access to each sleeping area.
-- Sec. 121-0. (a) 4.
The snoke detector is required to be wired to the buildingrs power
source. -- Sec. l-2L0. (a) 3.A smoke detector is reguired in the basement. -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.A smoke detector is required on aLl stories. -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.If the upper level contains sleeping roorn(s), a smoke detector is requiredin the ceiling of the upper level close to the stairway.--Sec. 1210. (a) 4
FTREPL.ACE REQUIREMENTS :
FACTORY BUILT FIREPI,ACE:1) Unit must be an approved unit. -- Sec. 3705. (a)2) Clearances and hearth size must be per manufactures approval .
-- sec. 370s. (a) & (b)
3) Chinney height must be per nanufacturerrs approval and Table 37-B
OCCT'PANCYSEPARATION :
Betyteen the garage and the residence, materials approved for thr fire
construction are required on the garage side only and any doors betweenthe garage and the residence are to be a self-closing L 3/8 inch solid
core door. -- Table 5-B & Sec. 503.(d) ex f;3
STAIR REQUIREMENTS:
A staimay in a dwelling must be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 3306. (b)
The maximun rise of a step is 8 inches and the rnininum run is 9 inches.-- Sec. 3306.(c) exc.fL
Provide a handrail on one side a stainrray 34 to 38 inches above the noslng ifthere is 4 or more risers. -- Sec. 3306. (j)
Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. Minimum height
=36 inches, naximun opening size = 6 inches. -- Sec. 1711. exc L
The minimum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. -- Sec. 3305. (p)
Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected as requiredfor thr fire-resistive construction. -- Sec. 3306. (n)
ATTIC REQUIREME}flTS:
1) Provide an access to all attic areas with a clear height of 30 inchesor more. The nininum size is 22 inches by 3O inches. There must be 3O
inches or more clear height above the access. -- Sec. 3205. (a)2) Provide ventilation in all attic areas. The net free vent area isto be not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of attic area.
The vent area may be L/3OO if at least 50t of the required ventilating
area is provided by ventilators located in the upper portion of theattic. The upper ventilators nust be at least 3 feet above the eve orcornice vents. -- Sec. 3205. (c)
CRAWLSPACE REQUIREI'IENTS :
1) Provide ventilation either by mechanical means or by openings in exteriorwa1ls. opening strall provide a net area of not less than 1 square foot for
each 15o square feet of area in crawl space. openings shall be distributed
on two opposite sides and be located as close to corners as practical .
-- Sec. 2515. (c) 6. Note: Vent openings may be reduced to lot of the aboveif ground surface area is covered srith an approved vapor barrier and thebuilding official approves.2) Provide l8-inch by 24-inch access opening to the crawl space area. Note:
opening may be required to be larger if mechanical equipment is located
in the crawl space. -- Sec. 251-6. (c) 2.3) Unless the wood is listed as an approved wood of natural resistance to
decay or treated wood, the ninimum cLearance between exposed earth andfloor Joist is L8 inches. The mininum clearance to beams and girders isis 12 inches. -- Sec. 25L6. (c) 2.
ADDI TI ONALREQUIREIT{ENTS :
For R3 occupancy
THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A SITE II-IPROVEIIENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY
SIIAI,L BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRTOR TO REQUEST FOR FRAUE
INSPECTION.
ALL CR,AT{L SPACES WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE LIMITED TO A EARTH TO
STRUCTURAL FI.,,OOR CEILING HEIGHT OF 5I, BE EARTH FI'OR ONLY, BE
VENTII-,ATED AS PER UBC 2s16(C)6 I{ITH ttINIUrfi ACCESS AS PER UBC
251_6(C)2 AND MAXIMUM ACCESS OF 9 SQ. FT.
ANY BUILDING SITE WITH A SIOPE OF 30 DEGREES OR MORE SHALL REQUIRE AlI
ENGINEER DESTGN. SUCH DESIGN SHALL ADDRESS DRAINAGE, SOIL RETAINAGE,
AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN.
ADDRESS NI'MBERS SHALL BE POSTED PI.AINLY VISIBLE AND I.,EGIBLE FROM THE
STREET.
For I{L occupancy
SIOPE GARAGE FIOOR TO ALI-,OW FOR DRAINAGE TO OUTSIDE OR PROVIDE A
FIOOR DRAIN WITH WITH SAND AND OIL INTERCEPTOR TO DRY WELL OR TO
SEWER. ANY GARAGE FLOOR DRAIN CONNECTED TO SEWER MUST BE APPPROVED
BY UPPER EAGLE VALLEY WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT.
\
(\)
ft$
l'-'\f
\i
' _-t-
\_il .
$
'-t(\:
:l-
\tI
\
.I
(
\f
.t
N
$s
u
t
)
\
[\
TL
- l-
F \il
t$'
'N:8,
S-':
\
\
{'
A
ri
-:-
|\-
N
si
4,t6t
t
i'\)
F
s
\
gt
o
ovt
s
\u\
..\r
N
$t'
\n
t\
:
s
Es
'N-s
$
\\
..f\
r\\
I
\
\
\
\
N
N
N
.ss!
N
N
5
F
I
-ii0licTrl
RNiNf$-+
I
.OI
N
6
E
\\-\:
I
=
N
aO
flI
VI
q
?r
ET
72
-(
N
ss:L
-\
NS
E\
$
SN:F
z
K
s
Fs $
s
$
$
t\-.:\s
.i_\
N
il;t;
s\rb
r$
r\
u
$
t
-ta:
tl
I
;
s,
t^
6t
n
s
N
,!>
s\I
\$
.,,: U
qo
Fn^
NNa\tr
IR:N\'{\i
:
N
s
{
rl I
sN
*$
$N''N'q
-s
R
sv
NE\\r'r-Nt-
;/ffi$ldF- s
v
l
!rN
\sr:$rJ_,.s.i $
:,\
:R\
b"ll';
tA
#*
f
,7'i2
f:,.c:
N+
\-+$s{s
Ns
N
E\$
'l
J'<
o
P
tn
A
0"
7?-r
{r9-st
Ih-/[a
:t:a
,{r
5
\+
N
\
s
$--1
$
Fo
+
o0
0
fi
1
no
0,
:i O,N.N
-\
5
-\.
\_ L
tle\\
\\
Ns#
s-
s= z_.FN
b-:.EtTF*F' ct\i
liR\+\Ni irN' \$t-s N\. .\e_
. > ._o*--
''i$ ^:- -'rNN-Sr\. -rs.\.$-s
.\s'-7
\\-+'\Ns'
N$--+s'
N&4l 5,t?'..\'/ ts t'>z h li5i*fl . ( '\-t
G-t J-VJ -=- 5.-:_ (r{
\g ,/t-_ \3-.Doo
o; J*a+ v
"{j"i$Rdo
L'l t
rb
v-l
e
r0
L,4
ri\
il
o
tF$*+
+
Lo|)?\
\I
I
\
I
F
CiI
l'
t-\ 4,
o[
n
^lV1
llIIt!ltl!titl
A
| \,s'
Pr
C
f - -
\r
b
(r
e
f
e
/rr\
I
il=
/)o
f.
rD)
, -"\ R'
J.-_\_
fJ,j-ryd
*Jcg o'-
s
I
nE0FEB 1 tliitl
Snowdon and Hopkins
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail. Colorado
Architects
303-476-2201
81657
February 8, 1991
Me. Susan Scanfon
Environmental HeaLth Officer
75 S. Frontage Road
RE: Cerisola Residence
Dear Susan,
This letter is to confirm my understanding of our meeting and two
telephone conversations regarding the Cerisola's fireplaces. We
undeistand that we are permitted a wood burning fireplace in theliving room, a gas "g" went appli.ance in the master bedroomr and
an antique fireplace fitted with an "A" vent which has 9" 9a8-logs in-the fam-ily room. Mr. and Mrs. Cerisota will confirm in
writing that this antigue fireplace will alwaye have gas logs.
Please let me know if this is correct.
Sincerely,
Pamela w. ttopkins
Partner
PWH/elh
Enc.
BECK AND ASSOCTATES, tNq::"i."iiiffiS'll: '""1
vAtL, coLoRADO 81658
(303) 949.r80O
TO
n
b+ $Q-'.:.\uJp,
WE ARE SENDING YOU n Attached n Under separate cover via
! Shop drawings
I Copy of letter
E Prints
I Change order
! Plans
LtrTTt @F TRANSnflITTAL
n Samples
the tollowing items:
n Specifications
oo"
-. l=o/q r',
JOB NO.
Irrrerur'oll;]:li-M.I
l'c\'Cto,^yM.r*-
C-.,-oL
DATE NO.DESCRPTTON
t
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
n For approval
f5or ro* u""
I
n As requested
! Approved as submitted
I Approved as noted
I Returned lor corrections
! Resubmit-copies for approval
! Submit-cooies for distribution
I Return
-corrected
prints
n For review and comment n
] FOR BIDS DUE 19 _] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO SIGNED:
l?ic]o!/cl tl92
-tu&-!
nc GoloD. lbs orl7r. T0 ordipHoNt ToLt fREt r-8d]aa.6s0 ll enclosu,es are not as note<t. kin<llv notilv us al once.
RETENTTO{ EIU3II\EERIMi II\EOFIPffiATED
5320 t^,. CIUARLES D'RM Sl-B
LITTLETO!, CO-fflADO 80123
(303) 933-1133
CRIBWALL
STABILITY
CALCULATIONS
I!lltJ.ltl,ll : !..et i-rtl;r I l:'tt:.i r.ll-'trr-t-,
l-t-I-.J\ | l{I.l : .,!ai l. [-ctlr-:t .ttjti
t-I iF_|]fl iEt) ; .Jrrlv lU. l'i'?r.'
DESIGN DISCLAIT€R: Ilps': r:alct.rl.:L.irlrr:; ltave- becrr J:reoared as
i rr?llr esettl..aLi.\.'r: .:lrt.rlvs:iq [r11- t;11i1 iljc drsiorr Dr']r'an€lt€rf-s '
Il i.'l l.l n: l i:st lLrr l.::.r l:i l.r t.r ,:lI t.he l)r ctie:ct L]t'tt ter l-r: r'9'<-ro l'/E
,-r-rr r€!:t tJ1;Li':ln rrl r:!t)le rt dr-tt: LO r:.}-i ll tQF..Ll Ct.yrrjitiotrs r?l lC Or-n I Lel-eLt
rjr-,r irrg Lln: nr Cr--lr €'Ga, O t ;- r\' D,.)t L j rft l Cl I f.l re t.'t Ofrt:Ser'l t^'t:r'|, .
ll,,-: l:r oiet L f],..q it:r- is t e!;L'(--'tt:ible fc-'t tttttt;tcl:rrttl [it-[ettl"iot
Itrr:littt:-.'t ittrj lttc. {.',(-r],";-i j | 1..:'l) l)f ir.rr lr.t rrr:il tlrrj clrlv
"r l l.rir .: [- icn ts or _ r- l r..l l,_lra,: .
,| rrL I tlt I lurr
rnelrrrnln{oor, 'q/ { eo scate paee / or .f
-
rilcoRPoRATEo sualEcr (2coq/^/,BY J c,/)
/?/r.tr.r,/tt ,
,//,zl r t'qS/s
6,i'/a i / = 3z' .// ' iztr gl = z'cz
i",-i ' t.*p 13 ./- (qcoVr&) = a"sz '
.5irr-a16,>7-r:-, fl = 7o- zr72? | /o/tcsto-t, a = a
F7u,.",a,/ra/ /-l-'J y'7"rr,," = (k/)(\.)
li= '7)nias-() =.o.saz
EFP = (a'a-716t"i'--i = J2"/ %'' " u/'1(- la fri'
,//,//rto.rrt :,/c-,/7',r.t't.;r ./'frs.r,l,'e = )1oo 2/ "-
B,z //r,' = 1,/a,'/tr,r/
d = 45 /l = 4./' y'a,r/)"c Erltt P/-'zr-
t?g*rd:l/ = //.o'
/. SPrr.'/r./r''+ "';/ >-
,r: s. / slV,) >- ,/. s o
V: s. /6ra'' .tlzt'.t-.>,2/ )
E 5. (a,,1 s*r't7/l )
/.o
>\ ./, s?2
)- /' s-o
ffiffi
jj rr.- | Lll I lvla
| enctnrrnlncf oarc /64 so scaw
f f ilcollPORATED- sue.,Ecr &z?ri/ *7,21'2,
J-
J /J);2 PAGE <. OF
lrP/lStS BY
fi = /r*:> //ll . /
_]:tl-l_l l-i-lll Iti-l l-l-l.lv-
/ /r /zqr',
4/v, /,ryr,
dl( /aFr,'fi =lz)(t.o)= 1,2',.-d---_=i----T
a,r,fr #
+
{
I
0
t,trt)\7
P.lA'12)so)Qz)'--
o
/oe
a.# r/a7rr
gd /a
? t*7/ /'>7r'
/ 1-= rnt "
L_
f ,,1/ = B.S cleajr,d
sa/tu frtu /'/e //
$ii.':rilrgi.'itEl
ffr,-L
1r....".'-'iDftiil'dw
/ s/ ,t.tyrr
Al,lfiffillli?.i'-,
pncr J or d
eY J Lt>
t1,'s,17t.+.{ rlro -'
= 7t tAD / / Z's'-
(2, ae")1v.' ) *A 7.')1 c.,,'':)
= 4rsJo{--,-.-
,l--^
= /8,7b (
4r q
Frs, t/rr' rl4vztrt:/i,nr'ns = (, z)<ta)(A,sa)(4{ )'- 56t35{
= 3,o /2/ (ta>)(3.5")(21)
z
trs.(o.2.) = :7t4?Z/d 7za
nlR - ,2r%7 '/)
FrTd (.oo
z'/..u= ftz)ttt)as)r ("")(s's) =/J.ze/'ada = /4'.//o ,l
t-s ( s/'/) yll/ -5str4f t,.t:':- = (a' tto.)(a c'Q
= Z-14 >./'s-D
4,o,so : Kr?4.
rs (s/,"))r,i'//tttu/ ;.ijt,r/i r,'.lt =z.gs >/.sa
, ,>
f-t ft tt I Z/: f/T -:zir/,C
/)=
/ar/(
(8't)
zl;t z/1'/orcw)C 2-'P i (t-s,zz"Y/) - /,ct's+/,{dg = 3, z/S zt)
("'t)'
- /.53{ =
///zt*,/l = J3aa %,/.
5,./ -- /tL(o '4''/og /.r/ u
5T
:n,
.L
D9
tal
0l
g,$.1
oEl
'"d
taat
i.tst
fitl'
,r
, ttl
f
vll
.i'
11
'A
il
ffr
?+
:fu\icalu!u,
..rsr'S-Z
''S
,(*
f;:
n
rh
:.5
'i
,#,
s/r/,/',/7t'i, p.,zrytd@.*) = /3!gr= ZO
I tttt EI a tutl
^f fnClnrfntnfl oarc/&'/u//9o scar-sl paee 4 or 5-.
-
lilcllRP0RATEI| suBJEcr a'( JLts
Lty'r.,-s, /-t ..'. /,,/ -t /
57o4. /t /.1 ///)r/y'5/ 5-=a:::==:=------- =::=---::
Crzr//)aro/ ,/-), z/n -, C; = cr, 7
/eoV '7n',,, /.?n?n /--y' = 4,r"> *'7'
So/t,e tt/ror/.l- z/r.7.z1 /: 7,-rs
ZP = 4,'>tio UY
,rl*t))ztu.z, ,{/.= (z,c)(t,s) .=
LT DL
5.Sa
( b. 7 /.,v-:)
,/ ,r'7cr,/f ,24s,-f/r,,rrz //r-vr s
/s/
/rr/
3/-d
4 i/t
slrt
L J/t
7/4
/r.9'ts.a7 -
? (2 a.u7 =
y' ,.;:' 0.6 / -=
C t.4 o.G7 =
"P @ o'+'/ =
/Z e o'c? =
/s € o.c'/ =
o. G;i
/.3 4
?,L8
4.,t2
ti' r-r'l I
t,,24
/o.o-{
'V,,>-rof/.sa) -=
,ffiffi
t': 'la
1.0.
r-i
aI
aaaii
/|rU lr- | Lla r t r, r.
I f nClpf tnlUC}arc. ,/BJu+ .?4 ssu-s
-
lilc0RP0RATEll- sueuec -, Fr*''ert 5/-o/, /,
, prcs 5 or f,
- ' ,|/q ./-lzr/*t-s- av JLr2
B\
A
t\
t$
U IN'
'[q
h
\\
\rll'.\
V\
\
\
\
$'!
n\
R
fI
'..J
ll
nt\t
D,
\
h
,\
\l$'l\
lt
::\
t'
N
h
\
t---1
\s
\\
N
H
L-J
\i!
$v
ll
\
\\
\s{
\
\i$i'
,r i\ i'\.) \{ It it i
u- 1t,l
sii *A
\
t\
\n,li
(l
-\)
{-
\J-{
\$
.x
N
Ill
s
Y$
\\
Aq.
st *
\r
\l
.n
'a\
rl
\t.
*.
\\.N
R
V\
"?.r'id:
s\
tt)
)
$(i'
tA
$\
$j
N
$\
\;
$,\t
rn
sJ
s\
\
Lrc\r\l
o\)
\
Nt
$
N
N
\\
N
\
\l$
rl
s
\.)
t.r
\
\
a\
r"l
o
\)
s
\..)
\t\
\
R
ni;
\
\I
\
tlt tr
,Its
cv)
\
\\
|rncttEEnttto-p^'. :kI lilc0RP0RATE0- "r"rr"r ':,i:tnit''r'<)F-'n r,rr''' \..-\X r--
la.
/-]..
ln
''?
".
r', -
It'?P\.,tt Sua-ro ^-t, Jc>-.eR (r:se-rv-ucrroS
+@,.*\ ,.-aa.\\
A>rnr-rl-Ji- -rD El.:-:r" .ltr'e- oV tlot-re.
KEVt-iDilE
f-L-rll l.ltr.r(:r
\JAtt-I
'il.I
Det\rE\^hq
lh6 olongaled loll !oc on
provldor addltlonll steb ty
lor slrsl0hl wall! !! th6 tril
Remova tho oxlrndrd tt[plrc.! rt th. groov!! tqr.ru-m th! btock thap. toll! 3C rldr! whrn bu dtnslhhl convox curyo!.
12e76rKEY
Bmmzsot
C)
GEOGRID
PIACEMENT CHART
Slnce actual proJ€ct condl ons may vary from
lhose assumed In th€ dsv€lopment of thls ihart. lt
ls lmportanl lo recognlze lhe condl ons for whlch
lh€ chart appll€s, whlch arg:
. Th€ b€arlng capaclty of lhe foundaUon solt be
low the wall ls adequat€. (maxlmum requlred al-
lowable_bearlng capaclty lor lhe cases presenl-
ed ls 35tn psf)
. In casog A,In casos A, B, and C, lhe relnlorced wall llll. re
talned backflll, and foundallon solls are sandysandy
sllls or gravgly sands whlch have a stronoth ddlh€d by an effecllve angle ot frlc on of 3F, zero
coheslon and a molsl unlt welght of 125 pcf.
. Both tho r€lntorcod wall llll and retalned backlill
are well dralned.
o Mlnlmum faclors of saf€ly ar€: 1.5 agalnst reln-
lorcement pulloul and relnforcemenl iupture; L5
agalnst.oxlernal slldlng fallure; and 2.d against
exlernal overlurnlng.
. Thls geogrld placement chart ls presenled toglv€^ the- deslgner/speclf ier a representa vemod€l ot how oeogrld placement and lenolhcan vary wlth dltter€nt relalnlno viallqeometry. soll lyp€s and loadtno condl ons.
{Not ]or f lnal deslgn or construcilon detail.)
'Tho cho l! lo ba u!!d lor rltlmrllng pulpor!! only. Dtrlon mull bc Drrlormad
by r qurllll0d rn0lnoor urlno lclusl d6rlon plrrmtla.t lor lhr Dropoard all! andgrld mrnul!clurerr doolgn crlterlr lor !psclllc Orld lypc.
TYPICAL WALL SECTION TERMS
Slopo !tablllly en.tysts dlrgram
EXAMPLE GEOGRID PLACEMENT CHART'
(__r
"
ifrJt+$#l$,8ftu![s'
I 600 Llncoln Elrstl, qltl,te.7-10^
Oinvii, eotorado 80203- I 609
303/860-9021
Chcckod
-,,-
Dalt.'-'
geet -l- ot "9-'
hir;*l rra rli!
II
I
l.
I
'o
t
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
l
I
i
I
'i
I
I
:
'l
t
.l
I
"t' '.
ii"illii. Y\rrl .. I ll .r ?' !"Y '
sTRUqTURAL ENGINEERq' 1680 unooln Ette€t. Suite U
oenver. Coloratto 80203'1609
30gt8E0-9021 Orlonl Chookcd.-.. Dal€ **
slrbrt--3n'.'Ot -3*
z
"l
$
J
d
F
9
$A
=i37
4Feln-lelgri . 11118__i)
$ ,'! r ; ii , r.,ti:,i iiii rl
I
F
I
I.1.,1:',1,:.:..:'li
l.i,:ill';rIri'l:i.ii,l.l!i!,i'::.!.:'J:.,1 'i.;i|.r;Ii:i:ii:ll;i.li "" i - I ' | : :'' r' 'rii:!,:;i.;:iii I ! !' l:: ' 1 ii.l , i' lil Iiii':li'r'l| | i t l i l" iI'r'lirl.::l'- | i 1: I ; :'1 |l.'.li.ii:,ll;ll!::!l'..,l:i 1l,i l,!,1'1"-'i l'- r'i i' l i l"i-l| .'l | | | l' I|'l'.:l;!"l ,rJiii:r. !'i.l.t l..iiv i
iii l iii'i;iilli'iiil'i,liil;!'ilil'lll:i;iii:iii'lr:i;r'ilri'i''lI l': t i 1 '"'"' : "i I .'l I
kil* it.lllt'l
t,t
1
=i
il
;l
r'!r*.1
,t I
rl'
il
.l'l
R
il
;r.
,1.,
I;,t.!ti
rl
i-l
i,l,lt
i ,l
ilt'
I
I
'',!::
'',€ |i l-,\i : I\'i\
6J
t
t'
\i i!a
I
Ir\
:f
;,"11n.nARHt$&goMF
' l58O Uncoln sriertEuile ?70oriver,_coloraao gbam- t cog308/880,eon1
Prorror No. {lz- .^r, *O o^ro:f-U$g-
proteaNamc lrardau bnru"drrv W*d,.
anan (0&4.NE *- 6lau . ,,,,0rrsckeo---_Dor6_..-_-
€hecr*l-- or 3 ,
FtrEFq
11 118
:
I
III
I
I rl
I
;*rl
P.PT
tti
nitl
jEol
ttpit;!i,;. i
:il!;l:l.t
i , 'l :
i-t-fffiff{#_i'""
;, , ,1
'ill.ri'l:r;l:
li I1::'i:l ";',
:t
I.l l.-,-. -
:l:,
;
:,LE(L:*
., Chen€Norlhertr,hf
July 18, L990
Beck e Associates
Attn: Flank Palme
P.O. Box 4030vail O 81558-4030
n n,cn,t,er .l ttn,(IIfEl(rn,r, ol cn,,,FF,,,ns
I
t'''.,tu'"',t
''n,rrqxc
nr (i s( '( r '\l\
5080 nmrl l5,l
Glenwofil St'nrgs.
303 945.7458
303 945 23G3
Sqtcjecb: sr&plemental Subsoil Study for Evalr:ation of Retainirg-Wall Design,- Cerisol_a Residence, Tr||L ,g, Blocl< 1, Potato Patch, Vail, Colorado.
Job No. 4 411 90
Gentlenen:
As requested, Chen-Norttrern, Inc. cordusbed a srryplemental subsurfa@ study at
tfre stfojecU iite to evaluate ttre subsoils alorg the tptrill edge of tle gcng{V
for a p-rcposed retainirg wall de.sigrn. We previously corducted a subsoil study
for deiigrn of fourdations of ttre re.sidence ard presented our firdirgs on Jw|e 22,
1-990, Jo6 No. 4 411 90. The supplenrental ruorli was cordusted in accordance wittt
g,l1r agireenEnt for professiornf erryineerjlg services to Bec]< & Associates, dated
;ruty i, rsoo. 'Ihe firdirys of ojr work ird reccxnrerdations for the retainirg
wall design are preserrted in ttris report.
one borirg was drilled alorg the edge of Potato Patctr Drive, about 5 feet behird
the backside of tfre pt"F'=ea r"t initq "trr' lhe subsurface corditions
enorurtered in tlre borrrg-are presented on Fig. 2. Belovt abcut 5 L/2 feet- of
various types of rnan-placed fifl ard topsoil, nredium dense to dense sards ard
gravels with a variable arcunt of cobbles ard bouLders were encountered. The
i"="ftr of a gradation arnlysis perfornred on a sanple of the rntural soil taken
fi:orn tlre f".irfo are strcmn ori rig.- z. No free water was encarrtered in ttre borirry
at ttre tine of driUirlE ard. the soils were generally nrcist.
lhe subsoils enccnrrtered jrr the boring are similar to ttrose identified lV 9.
eryloratory pits er,-cavated for tlre prelriors sutcsoil study but apell to ccntain
npi.e coLbfes ard boulders. The coarser ard denser naterial al4nrently urderlie-s
the shallcrr+er sardy soils liJ<e ttrose encountered in ttre pits. Based on the
fiJdirgs of ttre efrtoratory borirg, we recorunend the retailirg wall proposed
alorg fhe rehiff side of ttre pnc,perty be de-signed to inpose an active lateral
"urUt pr=="ur" of at feast 35 pcf eqrivalent fluid unit weight for a horizontal
backsl-c,pe ard sard ard gravel nacmiff corxtition. Ttre prcposed L 1rl2 horizontal
to f vei-ticat bac*slop; lurld increase the equiwalent lateral earth loadirg to
about 70 pcf. this relativety st-eep backslcpe could erode or beconE locally
unstable. Ttre go:ade cculd be flattened to z horizontal to l vertical as
reccxnrerded in cir pnevious report or the slcpe could be reinforced with
qmthetic aeogrids oi fafric Lo limit tl.e risk of stope nsvenent. Urder this
Gckslope 6tditio.,, a surc.l'rarge loadirry on ttre wall- frcrn the triargrular louq+ttq
sfrape pius ttre traf'fic loadirg: could be included in the de-sign lateral_ ]*d.t9aefinairq on the final configuration ard location of ttre retainirg wall. the
Beck & Associates
Jul.y 18, 1990
Page 2
rnaxinun bearirry pressLrre (toe pressure) for Ure retainirg wall bearirg.on ttre
coarse grrarnrlar Sufsoi:-s an be taken as 4o0o psf. Ihe slidirg coefficient of
concrete or timber bearirg on these rnaterials strctrld be taken as O.45. Ttp
passive pressure for ccnpa&ed stnrcbr:ral fil-t or a keyway crrt into natrrral soil
can fe tat<en as aoo pci equivalent fluid unit weigtrt. the bac,kfill sttould
consist of grarnrlar soif ffu" ttre on-site sarxl ard gn:avel er<clusive of plus
6-i-nctl rnaterial ccxrpacted to at least 95* of stardard Proctor density .at a
nrcisture content near "gtLn^. the soil ergileer strofld ev-aluate the suitabiliQr
of ttre prcposed nateriil for use as backfitl. The ccnpacted noist weigtrt of tlte
on-site soil can be assured as 13O pcf . Based on ttre granular nnterlaL ty-p" qrd
ccnqnction, we e-stirnate the backfill will have an effective internal friction
argle of 32o.
Ttre e><cavation for ttre rretainirg wall is proposed to e>rterd to the prcperty line
vtrictr is about 5 feet frcxn the edge of Fotato Patctr Drive. Ttre o<cavation depttl
co\rld be between about 15 to 2o feet belcrv the roadvray grrade rnrtrich will severery
urderrnhe the roadrnray. I,Ie wderstad that a slot e<cavation tectrrique is berrg
considered to onstrueb ttre retainirg wall. With ttris nettlod, a limited section
is occavated, the wall constructed ard ttre backfill placed to st4port the
occavation face before the next sestion is cpened. We bel-ieve elren wittr tJ.is
nethod of oonstnrcbion, that ttre risk of slcpe failtrre belcru the rcaduray will
be relatively hi$r dlich would cause dannge to ttre roadr,vay. 'Ihe roadr*ay contains
utilities wtrictr rnay need to be rercmted an{,/or reconstrucbed as part 9f !h"
pr.oposed deep o<cavation. the distress to the roadr,v:ay coufd result in its-repiaceo'ent. It tns been our o<trnrience ttrat the verbical settlenent betrird a
retainirq wall of this type couLd be between about O.2? to 0.5? of tlp wall
height deperdirq on the construction procedure.s. This could result in roadway
settlerrent on tl.e order of 1 to 2 ilches.
A nore positive way to rnake the er<cavation ard reduce the potential for slope
failure is to: f-) slope back the e><cavation face to a flatter gn:ade, 2) provide
terporary occavation strorirg, or 3) reduce the height of ttre o<cavation. We
assune ttlat ffatteniry of the occavation is rrct practical silce it will be well
into the roadway. rhe strorirg could consist of sheet piles or driven soldier
piles arxt tinber laggrrg that will probably need to be laterally sqported by
grouted tie-backs. We e>pect ttrat pile drivirg will be difficult due to the
cobble ard bor:lder content ard the piles will probably not readr ttre bottorn of
t}re prcposed retainirg wal1 o<cavation. Ihe height of ttre o(cavation could be
reduced bry steppirg the cut in at least two tiers. Erren with the tsryorary
strorirg systar, scne roadway settlenrent ard distress strcnrld be opecbed. The
nagnihrde-of mnrqnent will deperd on the type of shorirg ard ttre quality of its
installation hy tne contraotor. We expecb the settLerpnt could be on the orCer
of 0.L* to O.3? of tl.e strori:rg waII height or abo:t L/2 itrtr or less. Nornnlly,
this rnagnitude of npvenerrt wilt not inpair tlre use of ttre roaduray ard ocistirg
utiliti&. The strorirg qgstem strould be de-signed ard constnrcted by ergineers
ard contr:actors fanlliar wittr the soil corditions ard terraix of ttre area. We
will be awailable for furttrer oonsultation of the proposed construction lvhen
requested.
A stabilized earttr retajnirg structure is proposed alorg ttre dcffnhtlf side of
ttre drivo,ray. I?re earttr paraneters reconuerded abcnr'e can be assr.nred occept tle
( lr,'tt'':'i llt iltr rr.l'r'
Beck & Associates
July 18, 1990
Page 3
nnxinnun bearirg pr€ssur.e strould be assured as 25OO psf as reccrnrerded in
June 22 !.eport. Ihe bearirq pressure can be ilc.5eased try one-ttrird for
rnxinrrrm toe pnessure belcp netainirq structtue footirgs.
Linitatiors: ltris r:eport has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geoteclnrical erqine€rirg practices jn tfris area for use ty ttre clierrt for designr
pwposes. [?re conclusions ana reccnurerdatiorrs sutrnitted jn ttris report are based
ipoir Ure data obtained from ttre e4rloratory borirq drilled at ttre location
inatcatea on Fig. l- ard the proposed tlzpe of construction. Ihe natrrre ard extent
of sulcsrrrface trariations asross the site rnay not becone erriderrt until excavation
is perforned. If durbg onshruction, fill, soil, rock or water corditions
appear to be diffenent frcm ttrose descri-bed herein, this office stror:ld be advlsed
af once so r€e\raluation of the reconnrerdations rnay be made. We reccnnerd on-site
obsenration of er<carrations, fowdat!.on bearirg strata ard t--stirg of stnrctural
fil] h'y a r"epresentative of the soil ergineer.
Silcerely,
CIIEN-}rcRIHMN, INC.
Revielrred By
our
the
swec
cc: Snqdon ard Hcpkins Arctritects,
Johnson:voilard-Ar^ctruleta, Attrr :
Attachnerts
Attn: Parn Hcpkins
Bob Hurures
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
ffihb':f**\aa*i 1s?22 :
[tiit,^.'rr,i$ff;ll'b'$:$
( 'lt':rt'J[..!trlllrr'r r! l1r
&d Cerisola Reside-nce
', JVA Job-Nrmter 5410
Dear Pam:
At your request, I am writing to restate two of the more important assumptions made in design of the house's
foundation elements.
In an attempt to reduce the total lateral load imposed to the foundation by backfilled soils, we specified that no
backfill would be placed against the interior eight-inch concrete wall running in the east-west direction at
mid-width of the buildi"g. The desigrr also specified that the north ends of the interior eighrinch concrete cross
walls running in the north-south direction would receive bacldill on both sides to provide dead load on the
footings supportrng these walls.
These requirements were stated in the design calculations and presented on the structural drawings in the form
of "interior finished grade elevations" (see Sheet S1).
Based on 15"se 6slmptions, it should be concluded that changing the finished grade profile of the soil in the
crawlspace in the vicinity of these walls would have a sipificant negative effect on the lateral load carrying
capacity of the foundation. Therefore, we very strongly urge all involved parties to refrain from making any
changes to the current crawlspace soil configuration.
Sincerely,
JVA, Inc,
JVA, II{CORPORATED
1319 SPRUCI STREET
BOUT.DER, COLORADo 80302
303.444.r951
303.444.r957 FAX
ROEERT 8. HUNNE5
OAVID M HOUDESNETL
H. GARY HOWTIT
THOMAS 5, SOEIL
CHRISTOPHIR J. CHOP
MARK C, CONMIER
MICHAET R HOPT
THOIVAS P SKINNER
CHARLES B. WII.I(ERSON
CONSUTTING STRUCTURAL ENGIN EERS
February 75, l99l
Pam Hopkins
Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
,#
MEMB ER
75 louth lronlage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 47$2138
(303) 479,2139
March 18, l-991-
otllce of communlty deYelopment
Mrs. Pan Hopkinsc/o Snowdon and Hopkins - Architects
201 core creek DriveVaiI, Colorado 81657
RE: Cerisola Resi-dence
Dear Pan,
This Letter is an atternpt on ny part to docunent the
circumstances surrounding the trantigue fireplacerr in the fanily
room of the Cerisola residence. Prior to your letter dated
February 8, L99L, we had nunerous telephone discussions
concerning the 'tantique fireplacetr which your clients wanted toput in the family room of their new home in the Potato Patch
area. You explained that your clients, the Cerisola's, had an
antique cast iron coal stoker which they wanted to use in the
new house. I was under the irnpression based on our conversationthat the unit was an heirloorn which they were trying to
incorporate into their new hone.
f related to you that since the building perrnit for the house
had been approved and issued prior to the ban on woodburning in
new construction that you were abl-e to construct units in
accordance with the previous ordinance. This entitled your
client to one woodburning fireplace and one certj.fied woodstoveor two certified woodstoves and an unlinited number of gas
appliances in either scenario. You indicated that your cl ient
was constructing a ful1 woodburning masonry fireplace upStairs
and instaLJ.ing one gas appliance with the approved rrBrr vent inthe rnaster bedroom. In addition they wished to instal-l- the
antique coal stoker fireplace, which would be retrofit,ed with agas 1og, in the downstairs family room.
The pictures you provided of the coal stoker gave the appearanceof a freestanding unit. Based on the pictures and our
conversations which initially indicated it would be installedwith a B vent, I assumed that the installation would be sirnilar
to a certified woodstove. After further research on your part,
you indicated that in order to naintain the U.L. Iisting and to
rneet building codes the log insert would have to go into an A
vent. Given what I believed to be the special circumstances
surrounding the rrantiquerr unit and the nature of a freestanding
unit which would never practically be converted to wood due to
the size of the firebox, I granted an approval for that
'lantique" unit to be instatled eguipped with gas logs and an A
vent.
In a discussion with Frank Payne of Beck & Associates on Friday,
March 8, L99L, I was inforned that the rrantique?r fireplace would
have reguired a masonry firebox for installation even if it had
been eguipped with a gas 1og. Based on this inforrnation and theprohibitive costs required to obtain.the UL Iisting for thisunit with the gas 1og, an alternate unit was ordered forinstallation without consulting this office. This unit had not
been approved through this office and I was still under the
irnpression that the antique stoker was being installed until my
conversation with Frank.
If this office had been consulted prior to ordering this newunit or if the new unit had been proposed initially, it wouldnot have been approved under the requirements of the ordinance.
There were extenuat,ing circumstances involved with the firstunit which I believed to be a farnily heirloon. Under the
ordinance a second A vent would not have been permitted for a
new unit installation.
f regret the confusion which has occurred surrounding thismatter, but would like to reiterate that the approval given foryour trantiquelr fireplace eras a very specific approval for thatspecific unit and did not unconditionally permit thesubstitution of a different unit. The staff position regardingthis issue is that the Fourth Bay Victorian fireplace is not
acceptable for installation in the family roon of your clients'
residence unless the upstairs nasonry fireplace is converted togas. The upstairs rnasonry fireplace may rernain woodburning
provided this other unit is not installed. We appreciate thatit is not the intent of your clients to convert the Victorianunit at any tirne to woodburning, but considering the
circurnstances in this rnatter, we feel we rnust abide by thereguirenents of the ordinance.
If you have questions regarding this natter please do nothesitate to contact me at 479-2138.
xc: Frank Payne, Beck & Associatep
Kristan Pritz, Dlrector of Cornnunity Developnentt
cary lturrain, Chief Building Official
Ron Phillips, Town Manager
Dlr. & Mrs. Cerisola, O!ilners
RffilJUii i1l99t'
June 11, 1991
cary Murrain
Town of vail
Departnent of Conmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Gary:
This letter is to confirm that the boulder and drainage work at the
Cerisola Residence, Lot 29, Block 1, Potato Patch has been done in
cornpliance with the attached inforrnation from Craig Robillard's
office.
This verification of cornpliance has been requested by the Town of
Vail staff before a Temporary Certificate of occupancy is awarded.
Please call if you have any questions or comments.
Project Manager
Beck and Associates, Inc.
cc: Dan Staneck
Mike Mollica
6-t, L l'l ull I rl-!
Aprll 22' l99I
lls. Pw Hopklns
sNor{DON & SoPrrNS AnCHIIECIS
201 Gore 0reek Drlve
Vallr 0O 81657
grfiJectr Eoulder wallo & dreinagfe
Cerisola Besldonce' Our ProJect Nmber ll9?9
Dear Pam:
thts letter wtll curflrn our meetlng of AprtL 2zr l99l ln whldt we
dtscuseed end egreed to the followltrgt
* All boulders Drrct be installed witb a nini-rr'q of L/S of
thclr Daes belot{ a horLzoutal plene rxtcudlnS fron -tbelntsrsection of the htlleide apd the excsvqtlon' (!9"
ittached oketch, PB66 3). fhe encavatlon for the
bouldera shall nopo aot*rr^raid fron the sale- polnt of
lntersectlon. Att bouldere stacked behind tho loweet row
of bouldero in a wall ehall be placed to be eure they are
rstatncd by thc lowor row of bouldcrs and not aubJcct to
slldlng d;m the hilt. f,ardest boulderc should be used
for the lowegb row. lYalls phall be battered gtrd ohull be
Do more than four feet tall. If wolla are conatruoBed ln
accordance wtth thla crlterla they ehould ba stable under
nomal clrct.urrstances. Earthgualre forces ffere not
cohs ldered in eny snalyees.
t lnotber obsenatioD of tho project should bo unde uport
conpletion of sll rlte work.
rl lhsro sre nutrorous enaller rocks tbat ehould be reroved
or gtablllaed lnto the larrdgcoPindi.
* n & A wlll size a drainage faclllty for ths wett end of
the drlvcway intended to prwldo lubcurfacc dlspooal -ofnornal anounts of runofl (w to 6-year etom) end a
overflorr peth for larfor gtorms.
I ||'I t- t l I'1"-l
6-9 L 1"lo}.-|7=o 11 A{'.LldC I sel- s11 o rr, d cJ
o
lrllL)l'l- | lr-
l&. Pen f,oPkins
Aprtl 22, l99l
PaCe t
t R & A wtll work with you ond yaur landocape- consultaots
tq finsli';'i -;i:;-i";[*hir"s tho- dralnade at thlr
locatio ";i *v oltttt' pt"bl*r slted on the property'
After our neetlnd f nst wlth Dsve Gleuent and outllned $hat wo'o
dlscussed. As r ,riit 't" on vacatl0a-ior-the next aeveral reeksr
please norlc wlth Dave durlng ny absenee' IIe hae over LA yeara of
fi;;id;;'- io- "u
'f;;;---of dratnase analyela & deFtelt and sl.te
dwelotnent work.
I wlll be tn touch with R t! A perlodically durlng ny.trlp to. dlscuae
[Ul--p.rS..;"--;f tf,"' p""lf"l-*a *iff iollor,r up wtth you wben f 6et
back.
Very truly Your!'
ROBII,LAND & ASSOOIATES
b*.,*'A efu"-.^%
Cral8 f. Boblllard, P.B-
Senlor Consultent
242s/t&/90
te-9L l'|(]H 7tt'2 F-l 4Lr(:''C '
5t3r- Jrruw
o
Ms. Pam HoPklns
Apd 22.l99l
Pege 3
CBOSS.SECTION OF BOULDEH WALL
1/3 BOTJLDER MASS
SLOPED EXCAVATION
E)(STINGHILLSIDE
,1' A:,,r;ctt' iatEi TEL |:'r.r i..:'r':-1-r::1',r',r 11 i .r f, !t l 1i : 21 l,l0 . ur.ll F . t)l
fitrru,)ft,(NDtJM
To:
From I
Btrbject I
Datel
Pan llopkine I Srrowdon nrrrl
\\cllevid CIenent, ti.obil) ar-tl
Ceri oola lles i dence
I'r'ojecl; No. I lL)7!l
l'lay l4 , I99l
llopk i ns
nnd /\s51y11i6196
As s l'ollow up to craig Robillord's letter of 4-??-gI, I en eendlngthis additlonal lnformation regar<ling th,r' propoged dral,nngeLnprovenenta. Due tn recetrt conc:erlrs exprrlrt,rier(l by the adJacent(downhill) homeowner we bave r.e-evnJuated ih+: plana ior dralnago andlandscaping lmprovenents. rn hie p.evicrus leLter, crarg tnitudedguidelinee for the placeruont ard anchoring of londscapl boulders.rncluded here are detuirs for a stor'ruwoter drairruge facirity Et theend of the driveway. It ie felt that the,se inprovelrentr ar.enececsary for tlre folLowirrg reo$ons:
I. Runoff froh upproxlnately tralf th<: r'oof area and noarlythe entire driveway r.'i.ll be corrr.:en t,rat ed at the weet endof l:he drivervay,2, The steepneee of the xite anrl ol' ths hillside lncreasesthe suscet,tibllity t') er.(,sion rlamagie,3, The rrative eoiIs are not er.osion reeirtant.4, ?he landscupe boulrJ.ere mcnt.ioned utrove should not besubjecte'd lo eurf'ace erosio'which crrrrld undemlne thelratability.
1'o addreas theee concerns a d.yr,rnl J. Bystefl i.o proponed to col lectrunoff and enhance subaurface inf i. l.trati.on, ?lhe '<triwell has beeneized to acconrodate the s*year slorm rnnoff to provide a reasonable,leval of protoction without neJor site 'dior,ption durrngcons truct iorr.
o
The eyetem conerets of.a drop inlet nt the rveet end of the drrvewaywith a pipe connectron- to'tr,"-J"v""rr.- e-.etatl rhonrng the rnret,:|3"";:l"o;il:ll t" attached. r,"uiin'-"urculetions -ir"-..[rr" drpell
BUlUfl auanl,tLy
| 5-year, I - trour preciptntion : 0.gfl [ncheet dratnas'" l":"._19.i1n,lrv, piiiirr .""r, -'"I.ll
= 5000 es. ft.Runoff votune = (.s)(.sB irche,iiiiooo oq. i,t.),8i0 cu. ft.
Drrnvel.l
Hiiurli, llTil":."ierforaLe<t uranhole, Lr)' deep, w{rh 1.6,, sravel
lrvwell Volrrme = 3.14(z x Z)Q0)Back fill : t.14(36 - 4)(6)i.iaiTotnl Volrrnre
Pago 2
2449/^L/50
= l-26 cu. ft.
= 2(t0 cu. ft.
= ,.t*l!-.g};_$*
uco-2
vl ..t;tr.lrti l::
,ri i!':)rrl
lilli
.rj ;;l
tT's.,ri
3s-\sr
}ilHF
$$$
yl afz b
r.-t;
i'--
'- {
l*
.''
$
NF
H
N
N
B
Htr}|
s1
X9
ts
sq
$
,r!
9r
$Di
H\t
ilx
Phono 10"1.d60,629 |
Oenver Dlracl,1n3.,i Zt.M2"6
.O. Box $89
ilverfhorne, CO 90498 Robillqrd & Assc,cicrfes, Inc,
lllllrrrrl
11 .! r*$.(aPtr ." ' '. , 1. ,*r''
REOUESTVAIL 'crl
TOW
rNs
ROJECT
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PECTION:
BUILDING: ,/ PLUMBING:
Soor,*oa/srEEL €Z
*
- trUNDERGRoUND
rou*ot ou r sree@::::X
1 il;l_
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION E POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL -
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
C] SUPPLY AIR
)K{PPRovED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
I
oor= /-/z -fO rNSPEcroR
n&s@
REQUESTV&lL '!rl
ONNOF
::'F'FFSTIF: T. ?',|:V!F Vr.-$+E ; r-i.
rrusilcrr1 TOW(.r$'. u/u
!!
, , :/rJ-t t
Pffi
oor,- ?ft-f fu JoBNAME-
THUR FRI
.* LOCATION:
READY FOR INSPECTION:
r) \
tr
tr
B
tr
tr
tr
FRAMING tr BOUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
PLUMBING:
trUNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
FINAL
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr HEATING
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DISAPPROVED INSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
?--r/El:!rs'-- '
.oor= -la.
t
!
PERMIT NU OF PROJECT
." .l ,{{.--t I llrspicnoN REQUEST
VAIL A
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
.<<-
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:rU.F, YED THUR @
TOWN OF
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH /I'VATER
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER .tr HEATING
E
tr
D
o
ROUGH
Itr EXHAUST HOODS .
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
! neenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED EI REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,^r, 1- /4% rNSPEcroR
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL I
PMREADY FOR INS
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
TEMP. POWER O HEATING
tr EXHAUST
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB
tr FINAL
,! eeenoveo tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
a,
nrii6sror
DATE
NUMBER OF PROJECT
,*r#"'oN\,. TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL }
-,--t-€( l>.t t\-
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
Lr
JOB NAME
CALLER
BUILDII\IG:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V,
tr ROUGH / WATER
OTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
D HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
v4
) er 1f r,a
oor= tof ru { $tt lNSPEcrotr 4/rt /i,
r-q q t1 f,
-A.ta
A l aIIEI - T If IITTrE\, I l\rll
TOWN OFPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPEC
/\
41,( |
rNs
(..t-
THUR FRI
REOUEST
VAILJa
JOB ,NAME
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
D
tr
tr
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERO FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEEB" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
o
tr FINAL
D
TI FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH o
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL O FINAL
O APPROVED ISAPPROVEO EINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
D^rE 2-23-qd rNSPEcroR
priFsrop
O I
DtrFFBTMtrNTT EF
XXXXXXX sALEs AcTroN FoRM xxxxxxx
ACCoUNT t N0.
.TOTAL
AlrouNT
r 0000
1,l'liscel I sneou= C.s:rh
r 0000 i !:1 -::.:f*:.:Li Ul:i:;-;:-;: i::l:;
I 0000 F:F,-jrl i t:, i. * !ij:i:;ljl 1 L
i.ic,:nlrrr t. {l l:.:!,. l+ lrlr:i:ii:'
t:t,r:'f,.. t{i.ii-, Fti:;i:.r.it,: I|{T[':; ,'F:i.Ii]:f'Ei:Ti.L.ril FF.:
fjtrL,:'L- t ; t t.,:tri':j{: ].,J,:l : 'i!j'; ,, l.'ii:i
r 0000
t 0000 ffmoun t p'e id
l'lir. t:i!i
!:.1. i:lil
I 0000
I r-,en psid
!J t [:'i|lfi i]ii. I f, ;: :1 t:l$ ii
i,fi."rn'"1,:l r',t't.r-rt"i-rii,:J :'
10.00
| 0000 i
| 0000 200
0t. 0000
lzttt
J5
| 0000
oFF HoURS [.rsPECnON f!=
UCENSES fEES
On|ER FEES
0t 0000 41413 .slcN lPtltcltroN
:;1 .
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION: MON
^\\t ct\so \
CALLER
rtltrQ r
THUR FRI
rusfcnoNTOWN OF
heouesr
VAIL
AM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
q FRAMING
- ROOF &.SHEERtJ ^, .,.^,^x^qooF &rsHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING
-tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL q
c
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL;
tr HEATING
D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr suPPLY RtR j
O FINAL O FINAL
DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
XAPPROVED' CORRECTIONS:
tr
INSPECTOR
VIlzltl"l '\ ,tl) t
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
INS CTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL -l
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JoB NAME I'un t. '' \Qt<tdo ^z-<--
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
}(neenoveo
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ffi*ootoN / srEEL WatJA t24.*-
tr
D
tr
tr
o
tr
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAITING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr
tr
o
tr
POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
FINAL FINAL
ELE
DT
uF
trC
CTRICAL:MECHANIGAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O SUPPLY AIRtr
tr
CONDUIT
O FINAL tr FINAL
CORRECTI
ome /O - 3d -?d rNSPEcroR
$
: iui,'.,,, ' ',.t'
rNsilcnoN
PERMI
DATE \ - \-- q\ JoB NAME
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL ,.I
PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:\tn
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
PLUMBING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL - tr UNDERGROUND
fforrootoN / srEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
,FRAMING O ROUGH / WATER
r- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
trr tttsutettor.t tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP: POWER
tr ROUGH :EXHAUST HOODS
SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
tr CONDUIT
p nernoveo
CORRECTION
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
fn'
INSPECTOR
,7
!i
'\.,i , i
tNs CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL -I'
READY FOR INSPECTION: ,MON'
CALLER
TUES PM,qM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
q.froucH / D.W.V.O FOUNDATION / STEEL
E FRAMING o
D
tr
D
ROUGH / WATER
- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
D SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr
tr FINAL
n
-Lt FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
E HEATING
tr
cl
tr
ROUGH
-
lo EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr
tr
SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL tr FINAL
PROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
r, . r--l*-,.lrl+q.lrq-
tNs
*
PEcTION REQUEST
TO)A/N OF VAIL I
./ *'' -KPr\
AM
ER OF ROJECT
a
iNspecrroru:
o JoB NAMEDATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
THUR FRI
U
9Tt
Innenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERFROUND
'-.'o noucn 7p.w.v.
tr RO,FJGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEERu pLvwooD ilRttruc tr GAS PIPING ,
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAI
tr FINAL tr FINAL
"" MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
\
, - - /-1 ^\DAIE / ('J-V) lNSPEcroR
rNsilc'oN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VSIL t
CALLER
READY FOR INSP
LOCATION:
FRI
i
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
I-1 ROOF &SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
COBBECT
/ t,z a*,/oete / -'/ (, - -z / tNSPEcroR
td$sr*op
L,'rcoa(.-
.ALLER \, &( -
TOWN OF
rNstnoN REeuESr
READY FOR
locnTfoN:
INSPECTION:
a
TUES WED
h7L /..-.-
I
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V. )r{j-
6 rnnvrruc '"/frouea / wArER
- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAILING K.cns PIPING 3a'y'-s;-
I
O INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
EI SHEETROCK' NAIL tr
tr
trtr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
}(nnenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
D^rE o2 -/4 -?/ rNSpEcroR
{1.
ffisuop
rr'"{
REQUEST
V$lL +
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
,-\nooc LSHEEn- PLYWooD NATLTNG
-
o cAS PIPING
TNSULATION
SHEETROCK NAIL
-
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR '
tr FrNAt_ _tr FINAL
fneenoveo
CORRECI}ONS:
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION BEQUIRED
INSPECTOR
I
PECTIOrpwN
_=/ /;ct t
NUi
d 7l ,o, ,uo*,
5{
PROJECT
N REQUESToF V$lL I
/ls:a' S
tNs
PERMIT
DATE
READY FOR INSPEC
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES THUR FRION:n{
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEERu PLYWooD NATLTNG tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL FINAL
APPROVED',-- -,1 D DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
a,,''-)'?
DATE INSPECTOR ,,.1.
, , .,rF'i i,. . . ,.. .:r.
q( --- lJ
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
rNslcnoNTOWN OF
REQUEST
V$lL a
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
Qz\ <' =/"
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
'2, \
O FRAMING
r_.r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAII tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H, TUB
tr
tr
tr
NAIL tr
tr
oFINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
g TEMP. fOWER O HEATING
N ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
,-q
t-l
tr
FINAL E FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
niFsro"
w<7
PERMIT NU
2a)
MBEF OF PROJECT
-
-
JOB NAME
t
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
REQUESTv$rL !
DATE
CALLER
.'J'I
READY FOR
LOCATION:
tr DISAPPROVED
-.1
D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
BUILDING: -
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
rjF
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FqUNDATON / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,- ROOF & SHEEB" PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
D POOL / H. TUB
D
ft
tr
NAIL tr
tr
oFINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:-"
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
r-t
tr FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
Knppnoveo
CORRECTIONS:l
i'
\
oo-, 3 -,f -,/y' rNSpEcroR
'.
PERMI
DATE
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
3-/'J -? /JOB NAME
$fi.o-u=sn'ECTION
TOWN OF
./.i;'.L/ v17t1t
LER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:WED THUR FRI
(-
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON i STEEL
- ROOF & SHEEB" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
trSH OCK NAIL o
tr
o
tr
tr NAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH o
n
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY IAIR
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
SfAPPRovED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS;
Bfii*or
DATE INSPECTOR
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
3 /2 7 / JoB NAME
rNs
t
PECTION
TOWN OFPERMI
DATE Lt.
CALLER \l l'i ,' | -
REQUEST
v,$L
. '/'2
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:l
d)')
//t:\\ ( lTUES (WED) THUR
, \1_-..2 ../-v:iT /,-'
FRI
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
D
tr
O
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERD FRAMING
,_ ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
O INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
(
tr
SHEETROCK NAIL
O FINAL tr FINAL
$LECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
o
tr
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIREO
INSPECTOR
' ';lr)
^4 w* J-- P4//- INSPECTION REQUEST
PERMIT NU
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CT ro\ryry^oF V,glL .r
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
CALL
TUES AM
<JJC
@
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
N ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
D FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
O ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
E CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DISAPPROVED REINSPECTION REOUIRED
li.t
''-'----,-
sa16 ,5- ' -" !" - ,?/ rNspEcroR
/< -'l^ti-
PERMIT NUMB
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
OF PR JECT
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
6---/
REOUEST
VAIL r
CALLER
TUES o"o
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
EI ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
l!
;
.f .-r r - ?/DATE INSPECTOR
ONNOFrl
W
Toc
T(
trNs
rl
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
REQUEST
V4'lL q
(/ ( -?r JOB NAME
{+./ L4-
CALLER
TUES.: WE UR
(Jatr {@READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
0:
AM
PERt\4 |
.--,., vbtt:/n la1 ,
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH i D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
D
o
o
tr
tl
tr
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER '
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION D POOL i H, TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
E
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
D
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
drrrunl tr FINAL
AppRovED '4..14-r'Oe, 9n& tr DTSAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
rNs -PECTI
TOW
o REQUESTF VAIL,{JECT
JOB NAME
.READY FOR INSPECTION:
rocAlfoN:
CALLER
TUES WED AM 6il\----'
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
r-r ROOF d'SHeen" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SFIEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
FINAL
tr
,tr
tr
tr
tr HEATING
ROUGH,
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
, CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED EINSPECTION REOUIRED
I
dnre,tQ
INSPECTOR
Pnlkgro"
rnsilctoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF V+tL r
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
fr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
f] INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
trtr.
rnet TID DFINAL
ELE
trT
trF
trc
tr_
CTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
RRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
s'fris'oe
,y fug1ltn'a,fr D^ S
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN vf\rL -r
CALLER
FRI
PERMIT
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTIO
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
MON T
d O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIREDAPPROVED
CORHECTIONS:
UMB
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH i o.fr1.v.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
,- ROOF & SHEER
" pLVwooo NAtLtNG
' ':tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
trFlNAL [ trFlNAL+
ELEGTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER I E HEATING
C ROUGH
tr CONDUIT \,SUPPLY AIR
El FINAL
oor, /- // - /r rNSpEcroR
*
INSPECTIO N REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBE OF PROJECT r)- TOWN
ty'r^ -/'F
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI
{
\$\
{
I.,I
T
\
U
>
.tr{
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATIOIi / STEE-
1*.
_ ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
wet (,0' trFrNAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
-O ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL O FINAL
$L:; q-/n- fZ ,NSPEcroR
niiFs.op
f* tottrcrroN's couPLETEx)
The ltens belos need to be conplete before
glvLng a perult a flnal C of 0.
Please check off la the box provlded.
FINAT PLI'}EING
tr
FI,NAL I.{ECEANICAI,
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OK RESID. NAl,rE: CCC;SAIN
FINAL ELECTRICAT
I FINAL BUILDING EAST SIDE:$EST SIDE:
DATE:
TEilPOMRY C OF O
CERTITICATE OF OCCIIPANCY
,*", a -/ f,4/
\d.\a-41"-x\
-o(, Kz*en*J ,6,t2,1 |
7J Soutb Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
t0t -47 9-2 1 t 8 / FAX t03 -47 9 -2 1 66
Department of Pahlic Works/Transportnti0n
nm'n - la '\ltlu - ' -u')Jt
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
n:"";:lik 2>11,
July 4, L99L
Cerasola Residence Certj-ficate of Occupancy
805 Potato Patch
Before PubLic Works will sign off on the Certificate of Occupancy,the guardrail on the eastern end of the project will need to beextended to the west to close the gap between the end of theguardrail and their entry feature. The end section of theguardrail will need to be a Type 3E end section. A detail of thisend section is enclosed.
The rest of the guardrail will need to conforrn to the highlighteddetail regarding shoulder treatrnents withou! curb.
There is a section of shoulder about 50 r - j-00 r west of the entrythat needs to be brought back up.
The sections of guardrail with concrete on them need to be cleanedor replaced.
rf you have any questions, please contact myself or pete Burnett.
GHlsIh
cc: Pete BurnettCharlie Davis
Jirn HozaCharlie Overend
:
F
lr,I2
o
a
EIIIg{
att.
al
I
h
iuili'
Irl*l
(,
=(,
Cttt
boo.
G
lrJFz
lrJ(J
P
EtdF2rrl(,
J
t
52
al
tl,
1
I
1
T
J
;n
E
e
lrlctaE(
il'
iti
Hl'
a?r!
i5ITFTZaLliE
*r,r
J!E
E(
o
t
I
I
![
:l
fu
t
B
I
JJt
fri
ll
*
II
I
I
a
t
tsi
II
tt
aI
i8
b9
rig=
z7
N
t
too(o
\
ot
az
F
U1
i
I
\
II\
ti
ir
I
t
It It
I I
*
!
ttdd
x
E{
t!
I
lliI
!
Is
{
I
!I
!
E
T
Irbl:r
iE
IE
ElrJ
En
t
t
I
It
Ia
I!d
5a(,a
lrlF
lr,lc(J2o(t
,rl
II
I
B
I
t
t
!
at
I
E
$
t
I
I
R
I!
i[irl
tI|
px
$
oo OO
I=BECKI I iND ASSOCTaTES,
'NC.ilr
July 17, 1990
Town of Vail
Departrnent of Public Works
75 So. Frontage Rd.Vail , CO aL657
Attn: Greg HalI
Dear Greg,
I wanted to take a monent to update you on the status of theCerisola project. on July l-1-, I received word from Steve Pawlak
of Chen Northern that he could not recommend full height slot
cutting to accommodate the installation of the retaining wall at
the north side of the driveway. In light of this inforrnation we
have decided to pursue the following alternative course:
l-. Apply to Town of VaiI for variance to allow sinqle retaining
waLls at both sides of the driveway in lieu of tiered walls.
2. Install a pernanent reinforced concrete slab and tieback
retaining wall system at the north side of the driveway.This system would be installed as two slightly offset
horizontal walls that Steve Pawlak said he could approve.
The slabs would be back-tied approximately 40 ft. under the
road with permanent epoxy-grouted tiebacks sinilar to what
is being used in Glenwood Canyon.
3. Install a secondary waII of Retention Engineering Keystoneblock in front of the concrete tieback wall. The Keystone
block would be for aesthetic purposes only.
4. Install a conplete Retention Engineering Keystone block andgeogrid system at the south side of the driveway.
GEII'EP'I CO'{TFACTOFS
P.O. AOX 4030
vatL, coLoBADo a165a
1303194+laax)
oo o3r
Greg Hall
T.O.V. Dept. of Public Works
7 /L7 /eoPage 2
If we pursue this alternative course of action and can provide
adequate engineering information I am assuning that you will
approve this installation. If this course of action j-s sonethingyou feel you cannot approve please inform me A.S.A.P. since we
pJ-an on beginning engineering work on Thursday, July 19.
call ure if you have any questions regarding our plan.
Yt
FranLPaynevice President
Beck and Associates, Inc.
I.P/l<h
copy: c.N.A. Consulting Engineers
Pan Hopkins
Gary Murrain
July 2, 1990
Mr. Greg Hall, P.E.
Town of VaiI
75 S. Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Retaining }lalI Review
Cerisola ResidenceLot 29, Block 1, Potato Patch
Dear Mr. Hall:
At the request of your office, GNA has reviewed thecalculations for the above referenced project for compliance withthe geotechnical reconunendations provided by Chen-Northern, Inc..
The following is a summary of that cursory review of this project
and reconunendations for future submittals.
t. The Retention Engineering (RE) calculations indicated a1.5 to I slope above the walI. The Chen-Northern reportallowed for a maximum slope of 2 to l. By scaling on theplan drawing, the topographic information indicated a Ito l slope. This could reguire that a 17 foot wall is
required inEtead of the 14 foot wal1 proposed.
2. The RE calculations indicated a coefficient of frictionof 0.6 was used in calculating the factor of safetyagainst sliding. The geotechnical report allows for a
value of 0.45.
3. The RE calcs used an equivalent fluid pressure of 38 pcf.
The report reconunends a value of 40 pcf.
4. lhe RE calcs showed a Eoil bearing pressure of 3062 psf.
The report allows a pressure of 2500 psf.
5. cNA talked with llr. Steve Pawlik of Chen-Northern
concerning the possibility of temporarily cutting a slope
steeper than I to 1 for the construstion of the proposed
retaining wall system. He indicated that the slope night
be able to stand, but that the OSHA limit was a I to I
slope without shoring.
6. Since RE did not submit a cross-section of the proposedwall at its maximum height, GNA was unable to perform an
analysis of the system proposed. I{e reeonunend that the
Town of Vail require RE to resubmit the design with the
values indicated in the geotechnisal report. l{e further
9034 East Easter Place. Suite 105. Fnglewd, Colorado 80112 o (303) 290{170
Town of Vail
GNA, fnc.
JuIy 2, 1990
Page 2
reconunend that the nen calculation contain a diagram andcross-section of the proposed retaining lraII system.
This will aid in an independent anallzsis and review ofthe system.
In sunmary, since there were so many obvious discrepancies betweenthe calculations and the geotechnical report, cNA reconunends thata detailed get of caleulations be reguired to be submitted for
review by the town of Vail.
If you should have any guestions concerning this report, orif I nay be of further assistance to you, Blease call me.
Sincerel y.
James M. Nolan, P.E.
PrinciDaI
cc. file
+
3qr.n.p
2o) U.tJ
l,-7zr
b4o
wgl
/
= v,1'(r,a'{)(rr; ) --
l \,?-* q
z
.1+t,L
Z r?'1 Yh{
Gv 2.s X,/ f
?-'toTvut{
oo
Y,3, .l YAs
oo
z(e7al
kz xl--N
LZI\,D\
alo
h\u
W\l+ 2bo4,3t (+'n s4'r)'F 1711'oL(
55q {
z- Vhq
I, totl
oo
90002 f'o 'NolDNrt|svM' \.N 3nN]AV x8()A AllN Sfll
9i6L lsn)nv. N()lllol tilNllrSlHl . NOlr)n8tSNOf lol
oo
'srflr.tH)uY lo llnlllsNl NVllllRV lHl
-t)vUINO) lHl JO SNOIIIONOI lvulNlt .
. 9l6t O. oVlV
t0zv lNlwnfoo YIY 9t6t-LOZV 81
't € tldclBtled qll/t
afueploJ)p ul l! lla::o) Aeu rouair6l aql 'z'Z €l pue I e'el
'L'g
'
sqdeJBeredqn5 ur papr,rord se IroM Suttlro;uo:
-uou ro aArl)aJap lfarrol ol slleJ rolluluol aql Jl t'z'tl
'lauA\o
aql Aq panrrm s! lP^otrtar ssalun 'Z'Z'€[ puu L'Z'tL '! S't
sqdelSeredqn5 Japun pallarlol uaaq lou a^Pq qllLl/v\ PUP
3u rLtuoruof -uou Jo a^tl)araP ale q)lq/!\ l.,oM aql Jo suoll
-rod 11e ayrs aql uroJ, a,\ouleJ lleqs lol)Plluo3 aql g'Z'tl
'uolllpuo) aql fo Ala^o)slp laue
Altdruord afrtou qfns a,tt8 1;eqs rau^\O aql 'l)elluoJ
aql ,o uorlpurtlral oArArns 1;eqs uotteBr;qo sltll 'uorl
-rpuoJ q)ns;o a:ueldat:e uall!J^\ P lol)?rluol aql ua^13
Alsnorna.rd seq rau,,\ O aql ssalun os op ol Jau^lo aql uJol,
alrlou ual1.l^\ P ro ldlalal tat;e ,(lldtuold lt lf,aJJo) lleqs
lolf,erluo] orll'sluaLunloc l)ejluo] eql qt!^r a)uepJof)P
u! lou Jo a^lllalap aq ol punoj st lloM eql Jo AuP',sluau.l
-n)oC l)prluo3 eqt Aq parrnbar Aluelreal ;cr:ads a;qer
-rldde Aue Jo srliat aqt Aq ro ^ El Aq paqurserd aq Aeul
se aurl ,o pouad ra8uo1 t{)ns uttllt^ lo tuauldrnba palPu
-8rsap;o Jau^1O at{l Aq aruelda::e ra11e leaA auo ulLlll/r,r
lo loaraql uorl.rod paleu8tsap lo IloM aql ,o uollalduio1
lprluetsqns ro atpc eql rolrE ree^ euo ulqll^\ 'rl Z'Z'f,1
'Aqeleql AJPssaf,au
epeu sef,rAres leuorlrppe s,lratrqrrv aql to1 uottesuaduo:
Surpnlrur '1.ro1i1 palrelar q:ns 3ut1:artoryo slsol lle JPaq
llPrls .lotle.lluo] aql 'patalduor ro pallPlsul 'pale)uq?,
lou Jo Jaqlaq/!\ pue uor1a1dr"uo1 lsttuelsqns reUP io eloJ
-aq paruasqo raqlaq^\ stueurnfoo l)erluo] aql ol ulloj
-uor o1 8ur;re; sp ro a^rl)e;ep t.,.?gpfgv aql Iq patlalar
lJoA lle lrerror
^lldtuord lleqi ,dtlErtuol aqt f'Z'el
xuol lo Notlf,luxo) z'tL
'slsor qfns ,o luatuAPd aql ro,
alqrsuodsar aq lleqs reu^\O aql lua^a q)tq^\ ut'9 alftuv
ur papraord se rol)srluo) aleredas p Jo Jau^io aqt Aq
pasnptr se^\ uolllpuor stqt leqt Puno, eq l! ssalun slsof,
q>ns Aed lleqs rollsrluo] aql istuaurn)oo tfelluo] oql
qlr^ efuepJofle ur lou Puno, aq lro^ qlns ,| 'lau^\o aql
ol peBrpq) eq 'rapro a8ueq3 alerrdordde i(q'lleqs tueu
-a:e;da: pue Supraaorun ,o lsof aql 'sluau:n)o6 l)Erluo1
eql qlr^ a)uEprof,)e ur puno] aq lJoM q)ns ,l 'lol)ell
-uo] aqt Iq pera^o)un aq llBqs l! pup lroM qfns aas oI
fsanbar Aeur nW aql .ipara^o) Eutaq o1 rorrd anras
-qo ot pelsanDar
^lle)rrrf
aos tou seq 5'*El? aql q)rq/vr
para^of uaaq sPq {roM aql Jo uoruoo raqlo AUP I z'l'tt
'asuadxa
s,rol)prluoJ aql le pe)pldar aq lleqs pup uortetuasqo srt{
ro, para^o)un aq 'fl3ffiV aqt Iq Surtu^r.uq parlnbar 1;
tsnur 1r'sluaun:of 'tiertio3 aqt ur passardxa ,(;1er11trads
sluauarrnbar ol lo *BtH;1rF ar{t ,o tsenbar aql ot tuprl
-uol para^or aq pln6i{slropl aqt ,o uoluod Aue l'l'tl
)luo A,o 9Nrul^of,Nn I'tl.
)uol lo No|l)luuo) oNV 9NtuIAo)Nn
'rot)Prluo] aql puP lauA\o aql uo Sutputq aq lleqs Pue
'rapro uellrr/v\ Aq paltaga aq llPqs saEueqr qlnS 'sluauJ
-nloc llelluo] aql ,o luJlul aql qllill lualslsuo)u! lou
pue aull l)Plluo] aql Jo uolsualxa ue Jo ulns llelluo]
aql ur luaulsnlpe ue Eutn;onut lou {roM aql u! sotuPt{)
rourul rapro ol Aluoqtne a^PLl llt^'t rau/vro aql l't'Zl
tuo/u rHl Nl sl9NvH) UONIW t'zl
'!'€'ZI qdet8etedqnS ur papt,rold se ulelf, qf,ns aleul
llerls rotrerluol aql 'l'6 qdet8ete4 ol luenslnd rau/v\O
eqf Aq fuau^ed ,o arnlrej (il )o 't'ZL qderSeted ol luens
-rnd pansst {JoM aql ut eSuPtl) lou!ut e Jo} laPlo uallllA\
AuP (€)'llns, le lou se^\ .,ol)eJluol aql eiaqM 5'6 qderS
-Ered ot tuensrnd ryoM aql dols ol laum6 aql Aq lapro
Aue 171 'g'7'7 qdetgPledqnS o1 luenstnd uollelardJalul
ualtu^ iue (f) 'ol petlurll tou lnq 'Jo asnP)aq pa^lo^
-ur st lsol lPuor Ppe leql su ell lollPrluo] aql ,l z'g'zl
'iaprO eEuPtlf ,{c1 pazttoqtne aq lleqs urrel)
t{)ns uror} 8u;tlnsar urns t)Prluol aqt ut e8uPt{) AUV
e +3€t!![,lV eql Aq pauturalap oq lleqs l! 'urns l)Prluo] aql
/- ufT6ilrsnlpe aql ,o lunoure aql uo aer8e louue) Iollerl
-uol aql PUP reu^lo aq.l ,l 'apetu os ssalun plle^ aq lleqs
mrPl) qf,ns oN '€'01 t{d€rEPled ql!A\ a)uPprol)e ul paef
-ord ;;eqs .rolf,Ertuo1 aqt ase) qltq,lr ut Atrado:d ro a1t1
tuuaSuepue buatraura up ur lderxa 'ltoM eql alnfaxa
o1 Surpaarord aroraq rotreiluo3 agt Iq uantB aq ;1eqs
ef,rlou srql 'turell q)ns o1 astr Eutnt8 lue^e aql ro a)ueJ
-Jnf,)o aql Jaup sABp
^luai\
l utrlltir^ JoaJaqt a)tlou ualllr/i
49uH?3r aql aatS llPt{s eq ',tuns lf,erluo] eql ur asear)ul
-ug lo, urel) e eleur ol seqsr^l rolfPrluol aql ,l l'g'zt
lso) lvNollroov uoj swlwl t'al
'suo!t!puo)
aql Jo aJus^lesqo lsJU aql JalrE slep
^lua^\l
ulqll^\
apeu Al:ed raqlla Aq urpl) uodn repro etuei{l Aq patsnl
-pe Alqetlnba eq lleqs ulns tf,ertuo3 eqt 'paratuno)ue
aq 'llerluo] srql u! Jo, paprao.,d rel)elEqf, aql ,o Ilo/!\ ul
luaraqur se pazruSo)ar ,{;;elauaS pue paraluno)ua Ilusu
-rpro asoql tro.r; i(1geualer,u Eurragrp'arnlpu lensnun up ro
alnlrnrls Eullsrxa ue ur suorypuoJ u/v\oulun Jo palga)uo)
plnoqs ro punor8 agt ro aJerins eqt aolaq suollpuor
letrsft{d ulroulun plnoqs ro 'slueunf,o6 l)Brluo) aql
Aq Palef,rpur suorlrpuof aql qllA\ af,uBlreA lE aq alnlf,nrls
Sutlsrxa ue ur suorlrpuof, umou{un ro palpef,uo) plnoqs Jo
punort aqt ,o e)errns aql ^\oleq ryoM eql ,o atrueurolad
aql u! paraluno)ua suorlPuol pelea)uol Plnoqs l'z'zl
sNollloNof, oTryllJNol a'z|
'pelsntpe Alqelrnba eq llEqs serrrd llun
alqelrldde aqt 'lolrprluolr aql ro .rau^ro aql ol
^lnbe-u! lenuplsqns asne) lp^A pesodord {106 ,o sartnupnb
atll ol sarlrd llun paaJte aqt ,o uoltP)lldde 1eq1 :aprg
atueq3 pasodord e ur patueqr os are paleldualuot A;1eur
-Brro sartrtuenb aql ,! pu? 'uodn paarBe ,{lluanbasqns .ro
sluauJnf,oo l)pJtuo) eql ul pelels arp seJud l!un rt g'l'Zl
'atueql leql o1 lradsar qlrlr
'^ue rr 'es?ar)ur teu aql ,o srspq aql uo peln8u aq ll?qs
tlrord puE p?aqre^o ro, af,ue^rolle eqt 'atueqt auo,(ue
u! pa^lo^U! ars suorlnlllsqns ro ryoM palelar tuFa^ol
slrparf, pue suolyppe r{loq ueqM ' Wg aql Iq peuru
-uo) se lso lau lEnlle eql ,o lrrlToruP aql aq llt^r uns
ItrBlluo1 eql u! asear)ep leu p ur sllnsa: qf,rqr aSueqr ro
tt rlf,truv
'Andutotd
sJepjo ualllJA\ q)ns lno fujEf, llprls ,ol)Ejluo] aql
oo
/= z9 al
y', -a-'
B"eJE t,lof/ = 33.b?'
fqn,t -t€ lb' I ++t
'?n#u'ru
Cb.SLci -
,b€8 k
*tr:,i
,(rt
,bt
f.uvtt' = 41on (,\)
k X t-txz 4,'Uu') tt,.2
53q4
tots.of,
," --"p>*L?bsis.Lt+ ffi
**
sc|.2
s4,3
=t;J'X ' Js
g ="1.5i31
/= 4.vp trf
oO
n€ bff+3
\4tbl?''B
@o
trot
24,g2a2, t3
(z z{
6=' 3.1
cote- eo*a
oo
er6!-rceY ffi,,i,%,i9i,'dlffi:T,.Si#l:'iL'1330'$'$"'& l?iilj8jiji,rl-'Biil[$E'1ffi-i3i i#i8"'nS[ '*
oo
IJ
uollelap Aue to1 tau,r'rg.ot{l ol loll?Jluo1 aq ,(q Pa^\olls
rq ol llpeD ,o lunourE aql 'luaur^ed ro, elellr.llie) tttel
s,"Ona :$tarV aql uo apBut aq lleqs lunol)e uo slueul^Pd 'JaulAO
' a.{l ol lsof ,o uorleululrslaP ;eut1 tutpuad 'atuei.l) aql.ol
alie1nqrr11e-r(gttartp lauuosrad alrrJo plaU pue uolsrruadns
,o slso) lsuo!l!ppe aql puE jllaulq)Eu pue luautdtnba
io an;en lb1uar 1sulnru.ra.,d Puoq ief,uernsul u-otlesuaduro:
i,uaut1o,^'r lo, allo/rl lulolsnl to luauaa:8e Aq PeJlnb
-ar s1rlauaq a8ut4 pue 'aluelnsul luauAoldtuaun pue
atu p;o'Atrnres;etlos Surpnput 'JoqPl ,o lsoJ 1tua^lleP
,o lsol pue x?l sales 8urpn;ru1 'slslralsul 1o lsor:Sutalo;
-lo, aql ol pallull aq llEqs lso) 'sluaunroo llErluo] aql
u1 papl,rord asl^ iaqlo ssalun 'lapro aSuPqJ B u! uols
-ri$ur'io1 elep Suruoddns aleudordde qt!^r raqlaSol 8u!
-r"",l:x':,i;ill?'
J;"'"Ji'"';"i.1,f ffi :ll' ##l
t'€'L'z! puP €'€'L'zL sasnPlf lapun oslE pus'asetr qf,ns ul
'111o:d pue peeqla^o ro, aluemolle alqPuosPal e'uns l)eJl
-uof eql ut asPaJf,ut ue ro esP) aqt ur'Sutpnpul'atuPq)
eql ol elqplnqull€ {106 aqt Sulurro;rad asoqt 1o stulnes
pue sarnltpuadxa elqeuoseal ai{t ,o slsEq aql uo l)allq)iv
eql Aq Peurulralap aq uaql lleqs IroM q)ns ,o lsol aql
'pe^lo^u! ItoA aql qlr,rir paarord A;tdtuotd llPqs lau^\o
aqt ,{q pauSrs rapro uellll^l E se^laJal eq Papt^old 'Jol
-f,Erluol eqt 'uodn paaiEe st E t'L'ZL )o Z'E L'ZL'L'e'L'ZL
sesnel] ur qlrol las sPoqlaur aql ,o auou tl l'L'zl
'9'1-'7; qde.rSeredqn5 ur papr,rord PorilauJ aqt Aq 9'
ro 1ea, ateluaf,lad
ro poxu alqetdat:e ,(;;entnru e pue sarlred aqt Aq
uodn paelSe rauueur P ut PeutullataP aq o1 tsor Aq t'
I uodn paart9,(ltuanbasqns
io sluaurnloc l)stluoJ aql ul Palels sarud ltun Aq 1'
luollenle^a lluitad ol Plep
Surlerluelsqns luaorrrns Iq pauoddns Pue pazruJall
Apado:d trns dtunl e 1o atueldatre 1en1nu (q !'
:s^e^\ Surn ollo, aql ,o
eioul Jo auo ul pautuJralaP aq lleqs IloM aql ut atueqr
e uro:;8url;nsal JaU^1O aqt ot llPelt lo lso) eql f,'l'Zl
'quaul
-nfoo l)e.tluo) eql ,o suotltpuo) alqe)tldde aql lapun
pauro;rad aq llpr.ls pue'rapro a8ueq3r Aq Pazuoqlns eq
lleqs {106 aqt u1 saSueq: qrns llV'I;tutproree palsnIPE
Suraq aulrl lf,erluo) aql puE uins lf,eJluo) aql 'suolsl^al
raqlo ro suorlalap 'suotlrppe ;o Sutlsrsuor llPlluo3 aql
1o ado:s ;etaua8 aql urtllr^\ IroM aqt ur saSueqr raplo
Ieu'1re:1uo1 eql Surleptlp^ur lnoqlti\ 'rau^lo aql Z'1'Zt
'auir1 lrerluo3l aqr
JO lxns lJetluotr aql u! luaulsnlpe aqt Sutpn;lut 'qtt,trt
-a:aql luauraerSe stq seleltput lol)E:luo) aql Aq pau8ts
.raprg a8ueqS V 'raprg a8ueq3 {g l;uo pa8uegt aq
Aeu aturl l)eJtuol eql pue uns tf,prluo] aql 'autl tJerl
-uo] aql ro uns llEtluol aqt ur luauttsn[pP uE Jo l.roM
aql ur aSueqr p Surzuoqlne 'tJeJtuo1 eql ,o uotln)axe
,alre penssr /t)a+5p.tv-€ql-"{rt rauA\O aqt lq pautts to1
-)?Jluo3 eql ol repro uelltJl\ e st lapr6 a8ueq3 y 1'1'71
sulouo rgNvl{f L'ZL
,uo/$ rHl Nt stDNvl{)
'9'1; qderBete4
slqt repun atuErnsu! iq pare^or tualxa aql ol 'Pasnef,
raaamoq sp.tPzEq Jaqlo Jo alu ol enP sassol letluanbes
-uor 8ugpn;ru; 'Aredo.td srq lo asn ,o ssol ro, rollerluo3
aql lsuge8e uo$Je ro slq8u 11e se^lelrr JauA\O aql'Pasne)
:aia,noq 'sprszpq .teqlo ro alq ol anP llradotd stq;o
esn ,o ssol lsule8e urtq aJnsur llrl\ sP a)u?Jnsu! qJns ulel
-ureu pup aseqrrnd i(eu'uotldo slq lP 'leu^Ag aql l't'll
rf,NvunsNl $n lo ssor t'll
'plar{r1l!/r^ A;geuosearun aq lou lleqs asn lo Aluedn:ro
q)ns ol sarueduol Jo lueduof, a)ueJnsu! aql Jo pue
Jottrerluo1 aql ,o luasuo1 asn Jo
^:uednrlo ;erlred qlns
,o lunof,)e uo pesdEl ro pallatruef, aq lou lleqs a)uerns
-u! slql 'saDlloct ro brlod aql ol tuaurasropue Aq patuas
-uo) eneq atrueJnsu! Aradord aqt Sutptnotd satuedulol
lo Auedtuo: aJueJnsu! aql q)!q/\ ol pup tolf,eJluol pue
Jeu^\o aql ,(q o1 paa:te l11en1nu eujll e ol :o1rd aruatn
- u,ro) lou llpqs asn ro Aluednrro qlns 'roalaql uoltald
-rrJol lertuqsqn5 o1 .ro1.rd ryoM eqt ;o suollrod Jo uoluod
e asn ,o
^dnlf,o
ol rfuessareu l! sput, JauA\O aql ,l 6't'll
'uoltnqlilslP qf,ns lfallp lllA\ srolPrllqrP aql'Parlnb
-ar s! uolleruq.re Aq spaaroid af,uPlnsu! eql ,o uollnqul
-slp ,l 'srolErlrqre q)ns lo suoll)allp eqt ql!/\ e)uePlo)f,e
ur srarnsur aql qlli\ luaulelllas a{eu 'ase) leql ul 'll?qs
ealsnrl se Jau^\O eql '6'7 qdet8ete4 ur papr,ro.rd se uasoql
aq llpqs srolerlrqre 'apeur aq uotlrafqo qlns rt pue'ra^rod
s!r{l ,o esDJaxa s,rau^^o aql ol ssol ,o a)ualjn)ro aql Jalre
s{ep anrl u!r{l!it\ 8u!t!r^\ ut lralqo llet{s lsaratul ur satlred
eql ,o auo ssalun siarnsur aql qllir\ ssol
^us
aluas pu€
lsnlpe ol ialr^od a^eq lleqs ealsnrl se rau^ O aql 8'g'fl
':apr6 e8ueg3 ale
-udordde u? Aq para^o) eq lleqs lro^ pa8euep,o luau.r
-are1da.r 'apeur sr luauaar8e ;errads :aqlo ou ssol qlns
)aqe '6'l qderte:e; ut paptnord se aq llEqs a:nparo:d
eql esef, q)tq/!\ ut uollPlllqJP Aq plP^rs uP tllt/r^ e)uPPJo)
-f,e ur Jo'qreai r(eu lsalalur ur sarlred aql se luauaarte
t{rns ql!/lA ef,uepjo))e ur lr elnqulsrp lleqs aq puP'Pe^ral
-ar os Aauour lue lunorre ale.ledas e ur lrsodap lleqs aH
'sannp srq 1o erueurropad .radord aql ro, puoq e^r8'ssol
palnsu! u? ,o a)uarn)ro aqt uodn lleqs aalsnrl se JaUMO
aql 'lsarelu! ut i(yed lue Aq tutlun ut partnbar 1 l't'll
'9'€'LL qde:Setedqng stqt u! Paleraulnua
salusd laqlo lle ro.loAP, ul qtrea sJaAle relurrs 'AIprlen
ro; parrnbar l11e8a; araqm ualluA\ 'fluaLuaarte aleudord
-de ,(q srolrerluofqns-qns pue srolf,erluo)qns 'sjotlpjl
-uo: aleredas 'l)alrq)rv aql ,o arnbar;;eqs'aleudordde
sp 'rol)srluol eqt ro reu^\O eql'g'gt'' ridsrteJpdqns iq
pasodtur Iylrqsrl aqt ol pualxa tou lleqs saaAo;dura pue
slua8e srq 't)elrqtrlv eql paproJJe .tanre,lir Suro8a.rol aq1
'aalsnrl se raul O eql Aq platl aruprnsur r.{)ns Jo spaa)
-ord aqt o1 aneq ,{eu ,(aql se stqSrr qrns lderxa 'ryo41
aql ot a;qerr;dde aluernsur {lradord :aq1o i(ue ro g'11
qde:8e:e; s14l ol luensrnd paurelqo eruelnsur ,(q pareaor
lualxa aqt ol srrad raqto ro art Aq pasnpt sageulep rol
'saar(ogdtue pue slua8e'sJol)eJluo)qns-qns'srolleJluo)
-qns raql pu? 'Iup ,r 'srol)erluol aleredas pu? l)alrqlrv
aqt (Z) pue 'raqlo aql ,o t{t?a saa,(o1dua pue slue8r
'sJolf,prluo)qns-qnS'srotlprluo)qnS aql pue raqlo qrea (!)
lsuteSe slq8rr lle a^tel Jol)erluol pu? reu^\O eql 9't'!lzL ]l)!luv o
8311 We6l Crrdar Court
Llttldon, CO tP125
3G!-791-1600
FAX 3fiF791-1710
1-8(x)-36ffiG6
Prolect l^r Pago:
Locl.pn: v!,Dat6:
Produot:By:
Cll€nt:Choc*od:
a jz il 2l 4 t_t ai
I
'l -, la r.l a a;3 ,6
Y a t\I E
'-{ r 2a ?t '*ql'
c ):
1l
--t
.a D tfr .l ;t su-,
4 l---*t 't-
I aZ i
?{
il
I
{
l,.1
t)
n v t
)7
r t
,'/g-1.,I :l i
(Y t +.i b 3E 'll,z_.
I :i
I
r 2-I'T'
Nonrelnlorcod Conorete Sewer, Culved A InbEdon Pip6 (12" thru 2f")
Relntorced Concr€te Sewer, Culvert & lr.lgatlon Plp€ (12" thru 144")
Relnforced Concr€b Elliptical Plpo (18" tirru 144')
Pr€casl Concr€t€ Box Culvertg
PrecaEt Three Sldcd Box Brldges
Procast Concrrlo Msnholss
Precest lnl6t3 and VaulL
Preca3t R.tslnlng Wlll
Procart Sound Brrrler
Sp€clalty Precalt ltsmsCONCRETE FOR PERilANEilCE
!
Chen€Northern,[nc. O
5080 Rosd | 54
Gledwood Spftngs. Colo(ado 8l60l
300945-7458
300 945-2363 Facsimile
sttBsoll, s[tDY
TOR FOTJNDACTOT{ DESIGN
PROSED CERf,SOLA NESITEIICE
r-r'r 29, Bt cK 1
POXAf,O PAtrCII
\rAIL, @IORNIC
4 411 90
JITNE 22, 1990
PREPARED FOR,
mcr( AND ASSCINTESIifIN: FRANK PAYNE
P.O. D( 1413
\/AIL @ 8l-558-L413
a,rnmoe, ot tn.lEEilcrd$) or cdnpanies
TABI,E OF @NIENIS
@NCTIISIONS
ItJRSE AIID S@EE OF SruDT
PROPOSm @NSTTUCIION
SITE @NDIIIOI{S
EIELD EXPIORAfrTON
stBsorl @NDrtrot{s
FETJNDTfIIOI RE@[4I,I$IUT1o[IS
FrcXjNMiITON AND REININIIG VBLI,S
SITE GRADI}G
FIooR SIABS
I'NDERDRAIN SYSTSI
STJRFACE ERAII.IAGE
IJMNATTONS
FIq,'RE ]- . IICA|ITON OF H(PTORATORY PIIS
ETq,JRE 2 .IffS OF D(PTORATORY PrIS
ETGT'Rts 3 . LffiEND AND TO.IES
FIq,JRE 4 - GRADNIION IESf RESUfiNS
TABLE I - S'IJIO4ARY OF IAMArcRY IEST REST'UXS
t-
2
2
8
8
@[wrrsroDls
Itre prcposed re-sidence sfiorld be fo.lrded with ryread footirgs
bearfuq on tlrc rnbrral grranular soils ard designed for an allo,vable
soif fearirg pressure of 25oO psf. Otlrer design ard constnrqtion
criteria relatirg to geotectrrical aspects of tlre proposed Iresidence
are preserrted in t}re body of ttrc reporb.
PI,RPO8E AIID S@PE OF 8E['DY
This report presents the re.suLts of a sulcsoil study for a proposed
residence to be located on Lot 29. Block 1, Fotato Patch, Vail, Colorado. The
project site is shcnm on Fig. 1-. The trrrrpose of ttre study was to develcp
recomnerdations for tlre fourdation design. The study was corducted in
accordanoe witJl our aqpeement for geotectrrical erqineerirq service-s to Becl< &
Associates, dated June 4, LggO. Clren & A.ssociates, Inc. (ncw lcrcrun as Ctren-
Norttrern, Inc.) previously corducted a feasiJcility sturty for I-oE 29, reported
urder Job No. L6,455 ard dated July 3L, 1978. The results contained in that
study were rqrierved in preparation for ttris report.
A field erqrloration program consistirg of e>ploratory pits was corducted
to obtain inforrnation on sulcsurface conditions. Sanples obtained durirg the
field o<ploration were te-sted in ttre laboratory to deternine their ergineerirg
ctraraeteristics. Ttre re.sults of tlre field oploration ard laboratory testi-rq
were arnlyzed to denrelcp reconunerdations for for:rdation t14:es, depths ard
allovable pressures for tlre pr"oposed tuildfuq forrdation. Ttre r.esults of the
field elploration ard labor:atory testiry ar€ prcsent€d in the report.
this :report has been pr.epar"ed to srmmrize ttre data obtained dr:rirq this
sturty ard to present our conclusions ard reccnnerdations based on ttre proposed
construstion ard tlre subsoil corditions enccunter"ed. Design paraneters ard a
i ll.;:
-2-
discr:ssion of geotechnical ergineerirg considerations related to constmction
of ttre proposed residence are included in ttre report.
PrcK)SED @DTSMI'CTTON
The prcposed nesidence will be a multiple lerrel wood fr:are structsure.
Bottr clr-awl- s;nce ard slab-on-g::ade constnrstion will be used. Itre foturdation
ard floor lerrels of ttre str.uctrrrre will be sb€Feed in sqrer:al levels ard crrt into
ttre existing hiltside. C\rt depttrs are oeected to be in ttre mrge of 10 to L2
feet. We asstme relatively li$rt fourdation loadirrp, tlpical of the proposed
type constnrction.
If building loadirgs, location or gn:adirg plarrs drarrge sigrnificantly from
those described above, r,tre strould be notified to reevaLuate ttre reconurenCations
contained in this reporb.
8rIE @DIDTTTOI|g
I-ot 29 is sitrrated on a st€ep to very steep, sorth facirg hillside
direcLty belor Potato Patctr Drive. Slope gn:ades across tlre lot are typically
about 5Ot. Abcut 20 feet in elenration dncp o<ists acL.oss tne buildirg site-
At ttre tine of our field vrork, ttre prcrperty was vacant ard vegetated wittt
native gnass€s ard r,rreeds. A ferrr scattered borl-ders were eryosed on the grourd
surface. No clrrrious signs of slope instabirity r.ere seen on the lot.
,lr,,,i
-3-
EIEID EXPTORESTOT{
Itre field erq>loration for tlre project. uas corducted on June L, 1990. Two
oplor:atory pits wel€ erccavated with a backtroe at tlrc locations shcmn on Fiq. L
tp evaluate ttre subsr:rface corditions. lhe pits were logged by a representative
of Ctpn-Nortlrern, Irr.
Sanple-s of ttre subsoils were talcen with a z-inch I.D. hard driven sarpler.
Disturlced bulk sanples Here also tal<en. Deptbs at vrtridr ttre sanples roere taken
are shcnm on ttre Iogs of Dplo::atory Pits, Fig. 2. Itre sanples wete returned
to our labo::atory for revier,rr bV the project ergireer ard testirq.
ST,BTbIL @NDITToISS
The sr:bsoil orditions encqrntered at tlre site are strorn graphically on
Fig. 2. Ttre srrbsoils @nsist of L L/2 to 3 feet of topsoil overlying relatively
dense, silty to clayey sandy g::avets containirg cobbles ard boulders.
Iabor:atory testfug perforned on sarqlles obtai-ned fisn tlre pits irrcluded
natural ncisb.r::e content, dr1 densities ard $:adation aralyses. Resul-ts of
gr:adation arnlyses perforned on a bulk sanple talcen frcm Pit 1 of the natu::al
coarse granular soils ar:e strovrn on Fig. 4. Itre laboratory testiry is sununarized
in Table I.
No free water was encountered il the pit-s at tlre tine ttrey were excavated
ard the sr:bsoils were sligtrtly nrcist to npist.
' lt'll i i':i!r':rii',.
-4-
IOUNDASTOI REAHME{DASIqIIS
Considerirg the subsoil corditions enco:ntered in tlre e4>loratory pits ard
the natru:re of ttre prcposed constnrcbion, we recoNltnerd tfre hrildirq be fourded
with spnead. foortirqs bearirg on tlre natural granular soils.
The design ard constnrcbion sriteria prresented belcnr strould be obsewed
for a qgread footfug fotndation system. Ttre constnrction criteria should be
consider"ed wtren prelnrirq ploject. doo.uents.
f-) Footirgs placed on the urdisturbed nattr::al g::anular soils sttoufd be
desiqned for an allcnmble soil bearirq pressure of 2500 psf. Based on
oqlerience, we e)1pecE setflenent of footi-rgs de-signed ard onstrusted as
discussed il tfiis section will be about 1 inctr or less.
2') A1l o<istirg tcpsoit ard any loose or distrrrbed soils strould be rsncved
ard ttre footirq beariry level er<terded doi.n to relatively dense natural
granular soils. Itre etposed sufqrade sttculd be conpacted to at least 95?
of stardard H:octor density in footirq bearirq aree6.
3) lhe footirgs strcnrld trave a ninilnnn width of 16 ilctres for continuous walls
ard 2 feet for isolated Pads.
4) bcterior footirgs ard footirqs beneattr untreated aneas strould be provided
wittr adequate soil cover aborre their bearirq elevation for frost
protection. placsrent of fcurdations at least 48 inctres belour exterior
grade is typically used in this area.
5) Contirruous forrdation walls strculd be reilforced top ard bottom to span
an unsr.ported lerqth of at least 10 feet. Fotrdation walls actirg as
retainirg stnrchrres stpuld also be designed to re.sist lateral earttt
pressures as discrrssed in ttre trFardation ard Retainjrg Wallstr section of
ttris relnrb.
! ;, ' I
6)A repl€sertative of tlre soil erqheer stpuld cbsente all footirg
excavations prior to concrete placanent to evalr:ate bearfuq corditions.
IOUNDErION At{D RTf,AII{IIG IBI.L8
Fourdation walls ard retainirg stnrcLr.u:es vrtridr are laterally supported
and can be e>pected to urderrgo only a sli$rt ancrnt of deflection shorld be
desiqned for a lateral ear+h pressure ccngrted on tlre basis of an equivalent
fluid unit weigtrt of 45 pcf for backfill consistirg of tlre on-site granular
soils. Cantilevered retainirq structures v*rictr are selnr:ate from ttre re-sidence
ard can be elpected to defleeb sufficiently to nrcbilize ttre full aqtive earth
pre.ssure cordition strould be desigrned for a lateral earth pressure ccrptrted on
the basis of an equirralent fluid unit weight of 40 pcf for backfill oonsistirg
of the on-site grrannrtar soils. Ttre lateral earttr pressure loadbg on wa11s can
be reduced by 5 pcf equivalerrt fluid unit weigrt for granular backfill havirg
Iess than 20? ndrns 2Oo sieve size rnaterial. Ttris may jncl-ude sctne of the
on-site gncavelly soils.
AII fowdation ard retainirq structures should be de.signed for appropriate
surcharrge pres$lre.s such as adjacent buildirgs, traffic, constnrstion rnaterials
ard equiprnent. ltre pl.essures reccnurerxled abve a.ssuttp drai-ned corditions bettird
ttre walls ard a horizontal backfill surface. The buildq of water behi-rd a wall
or an utrnrard slcpirg bacl<fill surface will increase ttre lateral pressure inposed
on a for:rdation walL or retairlirg structure.
The lateral :resistance of fqrrdation or retainirg waII footirgs placed on
urxiisturlced natu::al soils wiII be a conrbiration of ttre slidirq resistance of ttte
'lr',,
footirg on ttp fq:rdation rnaterials ard trnssive earth pressJre against the side
of ttre footirg. Resistance to slidirg at ttre bottcms of tlre footirgs can be
calqrlated based on a coefficient of fricEion of 0.45. Fassive pressure agairst
ttre sides of tfie footirgs can be cal<rrlated usirg an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 350 pcf. ltre coefficient of friction ard passive pr€ssure walues
reconrnerded abcnre asstue ul-titnate soil sbrergftr. Suitable faqbor:s of safety
strould be included in ttre desiqn to limit ttre str:ail dridr will occr:r at the
ultirate strergttr, particularly in the case of lnssive re.sistance. FilI placed
againsb tlre side-s of tlre footings to resist lateral loads slror:ld be a granular
nnterial. FilI strould be placed ard ccnpacted to at least 954 of ttre rnaxirnun
stardard Pr:octor density at a rnoisture content near optimun.
8rIE GRADIIG
Wiftin the prcposed buildfug area, potential for constnrction irfticed
slope instability appears lcrvr provided good de.sign ard constnrction procedtlres
are follovied. Tro reduce tlre poterrtial for slcpe instability, I'rte reconmerd
pennanent cut ard fiII slopes be constnrsbed no steetrEr than 2 horizontal to
L verbical- ard ttre fill sesbions be adequatefy ccnpacted ard dLained. FiIl
sections will probably need to be retailed witl. structr:r:al walls siJrce tfie
natq::a1 slope is about 2 horizontal to l- verticat. Disturlced ar.eas includirg
crrt ard filr slope-s should be revegetated or protected k1r ottrer neans to reduce
erosion. Trqporary e:<cavation slcpes should be constructed in accoldance wittt
OSHA requirqrcnts for er<cavations (29 CFR Part L926 - enprded). Based on o[.lr
obsenrations of ttre soils elposed in the pits, we believe tfre soil can be
assrlned to be a T\zpe B soil. The achral soil corditions strould be evaluated at
ttte tire of excavation.
, 'l, 1,.,
-7-
Fitl placed in sribarilgnerfts can consist of on-site soils e><clusive of
vegetation, topsoif ard oversized rrcck arrt shculd be ccnpacted to at least 95E
of ttre naximnn stardard Hroctor density at a npisture content rear optfunun.
kior to fill placernent, ttle g:ourd surface strcuLd be prepared t1z rernovirg all
vegetation ard topsoil, scarifyirq to a dq>ttr of 8 inctres, adjr.rstilg tJ:e
npisture content to near optim.nn ard conpacbiry to at least 90* of the rnaxinm
stardarrl l>r:oc*or densiqz. Fill strould be benched into hillsides containirg
slopes of 2OZ gr:ade or steeper. CUt ard fiU depttrs stnild not ercceed abctrt
l-O feet.
FTOR SIADS
Ttre natrr::al on-sit€ soils, e><clusive of topsoil, ale suitable to supports
fightly to nrcder:atety loaded slab--onna:ade constnrebion. To reduoe the effects
of sone differential mwenrent, floor slabs should be sepa::ated from all bearing
walls ard colr-uurs with epansion joints vfiictr allcr'r unrestr:ained verbical
ncvement. Floor slab control joints strcnrl-d be used to reduce datnage due to
strrinkage cracking. Ihe reqtrirenents for joirrt spacirg ard stab rej-nforcernent
stroul-d be esbablistrcd by tlre de.sigrner based on elperienoe ard ttre interded slab
u.se. A ninimnn 4-irph layer of free{::ainirq gn:avel shcruld be placed beneath
basenent level slabs to facilitate dr:airnge. Ihis naterial strculd consist of
nirus 2-irch aggregate with less ttran 5Og passirq tlre No. 4 sierre ard less tlnn
2? passirg ttre No. 200 sieve.
Atf fi11 naterials for sr4ryort of floor slabs strculd be conpa.cted to at
Ieast 95* of rmximln stardard Proctor density at a rrcisture content near
' lt. ,,,' ;r l'
-8-
optiJrrnn. Required fill can ccnsist of ttre on-site sards ard gravels dsroid of
vegetation, topsoif ard oversized rock.
T'DDMDRAIN sASf,E.I
Althoudl free water was not encontered durfuq our erploration, it has
been cnrr operience in nptrntaincus areas tlnt focal perched gnorrdwater may
develcp durirg ti-rnes of hear4r precipitation or seasonal runoff. F)pzen groud
during ryrirq nrrroff can create a perctred ordition. We r"eccnurerd belour grade
constnrction, suctt as retaining wa1ls, cr:awl strne ard baserent areas be
protected frun wettirg ani hydrcstatic pressure buildup tryr an urderd::ain system.
The d::ains strotld consist of drain tile placed in ttre bottcrn of ttte waII
bacUdill sunourded aborre the irvert. level with fr.eedrainirq granular naterial.
Ttre drain shcnld be placed at least 1 foot belov.r fcruest adjacerrt finish gn:ade
ard sloped at a mini:ntun Lt to a suitable grravity outlet. ffeedrainirq g::anular
rnaterial used in ttre urderd::ain system shcnr]-d contajn less ttnn 2? passirg the
No. 2OO sieve, less tian 50? passirg tlp No. 4 sierre ard have a naxirnn size of
2 inctres. Ihe d:rain gravel bacftfill shdrld be at least 2 feet deep.
ST'RIBCE DRAIIG(E
Ihe follo,rirg dr:airnge precautions strorld be crbsenred durirq constnrction
and rnaintaired at all ti:re.s after the r.esiderre has been ccnpleted:
1-) Inurdation of ttre fctrdation occavations ard urderslab a:reas sfrcdd be
avoided durirg oonstnrstion.
2)
3)
-9-
bcterior backfill sttould be adjusted to near opti:nm npisture anl
conpa.cted to at least 95t of the nnxjmun stardard hoctor density in
pavenent arxt slab areas arxl to at least 90? of ttre rnaxjnnun stardarrl
koctor densitlt in lardscape areas.
Itre grrcurd surface sunourdirq the exterior of the buildirq should be
sloped to drajl away fr€m tJe forrdation in all dir.estions. we recomnend
a ninimtm slope of L2 indres in tJ-e first Lo feet in unpaved areas ard a
ninfunln slope of 3 ilches in the first 10 feet jl paved areas. FYee-
drainj-ng rual-l- baclcfill should be capped with about 2 feet of ttre on-site
soils to reduce surface water inf il-tration.
Roof dcnmspouts ard drains shoul-d disctnrrge well beyord the lfunits of all
backfill.
IJMrIATIOIIS
This reporb has been prepared in accordarrce with geno:ally accepted soil
and fourdation ergineerirq practices in ttris area for use by the client for
design Furposes. The concLusions ard reconurerdations sutxnitted in tJ.is report
are based upon the data obtajred from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations irdicated on Fig. 1 ard tlre proposed tlpe of constnrction. The nature
and extent of subsurfae variations across the site nay not becqe evident until
e><cavation is perforrned. ff durirg constn:cbion, fill, soil, rock or water
conditions appear to be different from those descri-bed herein, ttris office
should be advised at once so reevaluation of the reconunerdations rnay be nrade.
4)
-10-
Wts reccnnerd qr-site &senration of erccavations ard fo.rdation bearirg strata
ard testirq of stnrctural fill tlr a representative of the soil erqfuteer.
Sincerely,
cttEN-loRIlIHlI, NC.
Revievred By
Dfryec
cc: JohrEorFvoilard-Arrhuleta, Attn: B& Inrnnes
--*$$ryi- 24443 i
/ww;A. I'a-_-.
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
.,, f ,- I i, ;t'.. t,
o o
N
I
PROPOSED
RETAINING
/
e59
rSec
a51(
B5
WALLS 90
N,
lo
^6(
5r
)5
6'
s:
g
/tm o
PROPERTY
BOUNDARTES i
30. UTILITY
EASEMENT
APPROXIMATE SCALE
l" = 4ot
44||90 Chen€Northern.lnc.. LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Flg. I
o
Pit 1
Elev. = 8609'
o
Pil 2
Elev. = 85921
8610 8610
8605
P(uo
I
o
P€
CJ
LIJ
8600
P
OJu-
I
Pr9
(lJ
t!
8595 8595
WC= 10
DD= 1 15
Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig.
f wc=to-( DD= 1 14I -200=28
=ll
00=21
L=23
I=B
4 411 90 Chen€Northern,lnc.Logs of Exploratory Pits Ftg. 2
black
dium
o
cobbles and boulders, moist to we
clayey with cobbles and boulders'
it
o
LEGEND:
H rcpsoil; organic sandy silt, w
ffi Sanl and Gravel (SM-GM); siltY
[i@ dense, moist, red.
I
F Hand driven liner samPle.
l---
I i Disturbed bulk sample.
r--
+
NOTES: I
I1. Exploratory pits were excavated on June 1, 1990 with a backhoe.
I
I
Z. Locations of exploratory pi'Ls were determined from building location which was I
staked in the field.Uy becf and Associates.
I
I3. Elevations of exploratory pits were provided by Beck and Associates.
I
I
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate
Ionly to the degree implied by the method used.
I
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the
I
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be Sradual-
|
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time they were excavated-
]
Fluctuations in water level may occur wilh time.
I
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (%)
DD = Dry Density (pcf)
+4 = Percen! retained on No. 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit (%)
PI = Plasticity lndex (%)
4 411 90 Chen€Northern,lnc Leqencl dnd Notes Flg. 3
tt rt
HF 7 HN,
MIN I5 MIN.60 MIN 19 MIN ,I MIN
o
=
o.
z
oc
o
aF
Fz
o
DI METER OF PANTICLE IN MILLIMETENS
CLAY TO SILT
GRAVEL 22 %
LIOUID LIMIT
S^MPLE oF C I ayey
SAND 57 ry.SILT AND CL^Y 21
23 * ,,-ornctrY tNDEx I
sandy gravel FRoM . Pit at feet to feet
IIME NEAOINGS
60 MtN. r9 MtN.I MIN
S I ANDAIIO SENIES
2a
45
HH.7 Hn.
r5 MtN.
(,
=
Fz
(J
ca
o
42
iF
fit
Fz
mod
3A
20
DIAMETER OF PANTICL€ IN MILLIMETENS
CLAY TO SILT
GRAVEL
LIOUIO LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
% SILT AND CLAY
PLASTICITY INOEX
FROM
S IEVE ANALYSISHYDROMETER ANALYSIS
4 411 90 Chen-Norfhern, lnc.GRADATION TEST BESULTS Fig. 4
cA-2-79
*r
F86E
c(t'
(u
aoLc'l
P
vl
c,
al't-
Cf)
c
.EI
q.)
ro
U
ro
a)
aoL
q
-
E
F,l
(f)c{
(\.1 c{
|-\rr)
(\(\I
<t tr)
o o
t_
lxt;l8
I'q
l:t;
I
ao
dl
I
rn
+
C\
Ol
+
o
'F -J
f
@
UJ
IE
F
a
[rJ
dFc\
qicc\6r\/G 1FhJhcoJT FO
dc0:q
\)J
TL
o
tr
=
l
U)
= - /.5:/ =(-'
It C6tn
frur 6>gi
le8
@39,q
I
N, = 7';Yq'irP' tlz{
lrJt = 4'Ex 3,3*too lqs{
()l *3X3 k/oo 4cso
tQ"/-- 4xZfzw"" 3oo
Wf = +t*:'* ilr.t4-
o
y'=s
(on
5'
loo
+3?2-f
b47.Qt
=@ 6s.s lb
Vp= l'?l fl,1
sr= F*
, -\L zz/oq,z{tl 5t-{ Lt") 2-
lz
2N q Y{8'{z' Io53
Sraz{
Ito?',7{
47 38,{
3c1?zz{
.fI.
F
11, z
t4t
,rG4- cos-zq4-
1ffra'z{
.6uluado pTq 01 :o1rd s.f,ep .repuaf€c g ueqlJalpT ou rfcua6e 6ulrnco:d aql 01 6u111:r.r uT pallTuqnsaq lsnu 1sa1o:d qcns ,{uV .1sanba.r rappTq rlcpa JouoTleuTuLre?ap s,z(cua6v 6u1.rnco:6 aql lsaloJd .f,eur fappTq v
.6u1uado pTq roJ paTnpaqos alep aqla.roJeq sdep :epuaTpo LI lspaT le JappTq aq1 01 paqsTuJnJ
asTA-raq1o :o peTTpln aq lsnE uoTlruTnrralap uallTJl!{?eq;, .6u111ro uT a:npacord s;q1 .repun lsanba.r :eppTqqcea Jo uoTleuTuJelap p e>1pu lsnur r(cua6g 6ul.rncord V
'plaqdn aq pTnoqs
1sa1o:d aql leql aouapTla sE Jo urnpueppe aq1 ,(q pa:1nba:
1pql uer{1 :a11aq ro 01 lenba sT paraJJo alnlTlsqnsaql leql ecuapTla sp uoTleurroJuT 1uau11rad raq1o.ro 's11nsar asel 'e1ep TecTuqcal qlTr'r palroddns tr11n3 aq
lsnur slsalo:d :o lsanba: r(ug .6u1uado pTq paTnpeqcs Joalep aq1 aJoJaq szlep :epuaTrc gz ueqf ssaT 1ou ,6ur11:n
uT 'r(cua6v 6u1:nco:4 aql trq paAT"caJ aq lsnu lsif6:d:o lsanba: qcns .f,uv .uoTlrcT1Tcads aq1 01 unpuappe r(ueuo pue ,{cua6g 6u1:nco.r4 ar1l zlq pagasuT uaaq alpq 1eq1sualT uo s1sa1o:d :o ,suollecg3lrJrTc ,slenba pano:dde:og slsanbaJl,Icua6g 6ulrnco:d/aq1 01 lTuqns r{eur :epp1q g
Llo4 J.w.-,o)_.se.rnpaco.rd
?saq1 zlq pa.rlnba: se sXsenba: paluauncop ,ua111.rn
6u1111uqns go I1;1;qlsuodsar aq1 uo.rJ srappTq alaTfar'ralaltoq '1ou op suoTssncsTp qcns ..dcua6g 6u1.rnco:6 aq1qlTlq epuappr pue uoTlpcTJTcads slrq1 ssncsTp r{eu :app1q g
'epueppe pup auoTlecrElcads Jo AarrraJ
{aas of s;appTq JoJ sarnpacord saqsTTqplsa uoTlcas sTt{&
sgaoctcoud ilerAsu usqqrg 9Z'9I
er1T,I
a:n1eu61g
altq
'L.I99 UgC Gt uT suoTleTn6aU pug lcvacuelsrssv uoTlegodsue:,L aceJJnS aq1 Jo (l) (q) .ro (Z)
(q) Sgt uoTlcas 01 +uensrnd 1uaua.r1nba.r aql o1 uolldacxauE JoJ zlEllenb deu lnq t7g6l Jo lcv uog1e1:odsuprf,,
eceJJnS aq1 Jo e (q) 99T uoTlcas Jo sluaua.rlnba.r aq1q1lat r(ldruoc louuec 1T lpql seTJTlrac ,{qaraq rappTq ar{f,,
88 /8
IO
T;IITICVJ HSV}{ SNS
BUS WASI.I FAtrILITY
sgc-:t_Lg_N ol_Q]!l : Eut$r88IL_QE_H.Q&yr
E[.';'*i.g.c_t_Qg-E.q]:-]_gt_L,:,8: The trr.o.ject, consists r,f aFaci I ity, I ithin the T*wn c,f Vai I f,r-rbl icasi slr curoelnts pt epar.eld by Mr-'r.t e.r"dat e
C:crrr5i:;tg c,f tlte cc'rrgtrr"tct i c,rl c'f a cc,nct are r artc,rrt"vbt-tilding with prer-cerst n pr"e**:treissed cc.ncr.erter berarrr:; and d*,r-rbIe-t*;rernrf lnelrrberrs, c'ver"head cjuc,r":: and f ixed plarit ic glaaecl wirrcJr,wso ;rsinglel-ply r.nof ing roerrrh:r"ane, lr,:rrrr;inH arr autL:,r altie br_rs wa:;lrin;trInachirre, etqttiprl1errrt as$c,ciat{rcl therewitho di61giel f r_rel inll e*c1qiprrrerit.'l'he enclsserd p*r't i,:rr c,f ther hui 1d ing is apprrr,x irrrately li6r x ;?gtarrd has an attacl'ted unenclr,sed carrcrpy ;rpprnx ilrrately ;:$r x 4-lt t
/f{|vin0 and otl'rer. :;ite i rrr pr.':verrretnt s are requir"ecl a:: par"t *f ttre
'Nt,t'k.
Qg11f;r'act gI. Use of F,r.ernises: Lirrrit r_rse c,f the prerni sj,e*:; tc,c.:nstt'uet ic,n activities in ar.eas indicated; al lor^, f '::t I- c{rrrt inr-ranee
':,f tl't€ c,ther' act ivit ies conducterd try the owner" c.rr the giter.
C,:,nf ine npenat irns t': areas within or:ntr.act I irrrits: incl ieateil.Fc,r'tions nf the site beyrrnd ar.eag in wlrich cc,nstt r_rct ir:,rrtJpel.;rt ii:,rr:3 ar.c? inct icatecl ia,r.e n$t t* be distur.becl.
END OF sLV SECTION Ol(,lcI
s7
Qe7
a,/68
1.1 / i1-7
new Et r-r si tJash i nq
Wc.r"ks c:c'rflFr,L.nd,
Arclr i t eret:r,n Cont r.ac:
Ar-rqrrst _-_, l9AB.
SUM|'IARY EF WORl.i .:) l.:) 1 i) -. I
L
/aJ
FIETENTION
ENGINEEFIING
:i: i';:': ',,/,. Ulr..ar iga E'n *,1-E
LltEl',.rn C}oLcnado BOI ea
[3O3lgg+1133
(EOOI7e7-CEOO
Photographa
Sllder
Gopy of Lcttct
Eanch Fl€bention 6pealrlisEs
-tfi':.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
T0l
ATTNI
REr
( r/rrcsnrtrt covER sltEET
WN ARB SENDIIIC YOU
( ) Plans( ) Calculatlonr
( .) ottrer
DESCRIPTION
()
()
()
)
)
)
oan, a (4 (46._-. -. ..
roBr 4.7-.q,-uf7
NI'MBER OP PAGES TO FOIIOI{ I
lachnlcel Revl,cwg
Stendrrd Planr
Speclflcatlone
(
(
(
IIIESE ARE TRAIISUITTED AS CHECKED BELOI{
( ) for Your Ue: ( )! .ljot Approval a i( TAe Requeeted a t
For Revley And Gomrncnt
Approvrd Ar Notcd
Returncd After Loen To Ur
SEMANKS
,tt
".t . r! llt*i -_. ,:! rlgfib3n
^d
-
g611s t0r 2' . pAcE t or / .-
BY ,4r'.|-g
I
I
i
I
I
TO
BEGK AND A;:,ofi!|trt, rNG.o
vAtt, coLoRADo 81658
LETTfuF TRANSNflITTAL
the f ollowing items:
n Specifications
(303) 949.1800
WE ARE SENDING YOU n Attached ! Under separate cover via
tr Shop drawings
n Copy of letter
n Prints
E Change order
! Plans ! Samples
fl
coPtEs DATE NO.I DESCRTPTTON
l'.c,[--[e1
-j\*V-p".\
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
! For approval
n For your use
n Approved as submitted
n Approved as noted
! Resubmit-copies for approval
n Submit
-copies
lor distribution
n Return
-corrected
orintsljts requested n Returned for correctionsI
/n For r""i"* and comment n
-
f] FOR BIDS DUE-19- ! PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
'rc \-.--* \*-\o\ t^-s-.*\t U-
olt._-.*\-\-.- \ a.^-\=, \}..
COPY TO
Piot Jcr249.2,/rrffil'hc., G.rro., [k* 01fi lo mr Plort ro,L Fnft 1.$25.63o ll enclosurcs a.e not as noleal, kindly nolily us al ohco.
E:r'rr.P - trJ?
53eO W. Guenlca On # 1-BLitbloEon, Eolonpdo EOI eO
i3os] e33_1133
tBoo) 7e7.36OO
Mr.
73
Val
fct Retalnlng walt for tho Ccrtsolr Reridcncc.
Doar grsg,
Mr' Frank payne of Bcck & Assoc, hrl requcstcd thar I wrrto to you and addrcc,thc probtcm of rh. rerrtning wrlt i;; ino c.rirot;-Ra;rioirr, My undrrrtandtngIt that rhcrc rro two_ rremr-or-roni.rn wrrh ,rrf..i- ii" ,r,o r.tarnrng wrrlproposod for ths north rldc of iio-iij're*ay 1nd rhat thay rf0 er followr:(1') Thet r rctrrnrng wail 0rr bo conr!rucr?d.wi thin tho spac! dsfinad by thcdrlvowry bolow thc wali and tf,."pirprrry ,,n, rbovr the watt.
Ilit.:;lrf:r';::il?:;:tod ur lnB tho rctrrning war r conrsurat ton rndrcrrcd rn
(2.) That rn excavrt ion crn bo 11do_ fo.r tho purporc or Inetal I Ing rhorrtrlnlng wal I wlthout undormlning iot.to0 prtch road rbovo thc wat r.Thlr crn bc rcsompllrhcd utlng r rrlot cuir technlquc (reo RE, Tcchnlcrt Ravlcwll2). tn rhtr way rhc cxcrvarton will rematn opcn ;;; ;;;; I mlntmrt rmounr ofttmo (t-2 drvr) bororr bcrns;;;r;;;'*i,r, .,,. lri.i.ini""i'. wrth r qurrfredool lr cngrnccrir rpprover, irrr;';;;;.r;rr hrr bqen rucccsrfur fn thc pa3r.
Plsrsc lrt mc &now lf you hrvc eny furthcr queslton:.
Slnccicty,
/uW
iEfiEi^ffi"
Etr,gh FleEenEion Speeialiggg
J uno 21,r 990
Grcg Hatl
S. Frontag,c Rordt, @ 81657
Alan Strockcr
JUt'{- 5-9r:r 1 .+ : El r:1 lit +. r.- '+ r-r t. | .:. r-r E r-r .l . .tTLIE
/ ntre nlon OrroJEcr NAME
-
tilcoRPoRATEo
..F -_ 133
Joa NuMein '
I I rtalrEEnrt{(i DArE
ar".,r"r?at*l
r'I
'l' I.r I'ti
'l. l'rlt.I l..t ir+".rf
.t.i
;1.
,'i l- ll
; i'i i'':1|, --l r
.',.1
',Ji''l.'; f r-
1-i
1.
''r l
.:-i-
t-t.'.
:
i
.....1 ,i. -.r .l r.
l. -r. r.
l. -,,... i
'' F.
't
.t'i'l
I M,r. t4,\\u.^
IE ETJUNlltgsl
June 11, 1991
Gary Murrain
Town of VaiI
Department of Community Developrnent
75 South Frontage Road West
vail, co 81657
Dear Gary:
This letter is to confirm that the boulder and drainage work at the
Cerisola Residence, Lot 29, Block 1, Potato Patch has been done in
cornpliance with the attached inforrnation from Craig Robillard's
office.
This verification of cornpliance has been requested by the Toltn of
Vail staff before a Tenrporary Certificate of Occupancy is awarded'
Please call if you have any questions or comments.
\'r--Y
t
Fr:Project Manager
Beck and Associates, Inc.
cc: Dan Staneck
Mike MoIlica
I t
Project Application
ProjectName: C o ?
o^r" 5. /'? l ' *
Projecl Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot 21 Blocr< / , r,t,^n 7a'6-* /*A( , zon" P/S
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
n^ Irc.4 H,4
Town Planner
6a1a' 5'l'?l
(.,",, Approval
J o
VAIL POTATO PATCH
Q"-'--t
DATE: JAN 9, 1991
LEGAL: LOT
ADDRESS:POTATO PA
OWNER:
ARCHITECT:
29 BLOCK 1 FILING
CERISOLA RESIDENCE pHoNE */0,7\
SNOWDEN & HOPKINS PHONE #
4e73 f
d'*lo{*
4ao15€r/rauJ
lS THE LOT SLOPE OVER 30% ,,::,YES/NO NO
I
2.0
NO;, OF GARAGE.,SPACES,,i :: .. :; ::: ;.:,;r:; .,..' ... .',,.'. " .,.2.0
0.0-
0.0
ALEOWED SITE COVERAGE.,,. .;;r:::,r ,,,, ,' ' ,0.0
0.0
SITE COVEBAGE REMAINING 0.0
0.0
SED ON SITE ::: ,:l ri: ii,:i i::r .., i :'.,'r,',: :,.:," :,4,091.0
lffi#
29.0 97.0 (s.0)0.0 (1s.0)0,0
UNIT ONE
BASEMENT SQ.FT:796.0 0.0 28.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0
2,254.0 0.0 250.0 105.0 1 10.0 0.0 21.0
2,331 .O 571.0 25.0 0.0 94.0 65.0 34.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CHEDIT TOTAtS.Ui , , 'r,290.0 CREDIT
TOTALS
i 571t0 :, ,,, ::, :,tt::303.0 I
,,,,: :204.0,i50,0 :,::: ,,:'r'62.0.,
ADDED GRFA(IE 250?)0.0 29.0 97.0 (s.0)0.0 (1s.0)0.0
0.0
GRFA USED ' . '. .. .4,091.0
GRFA REMAINING, :: ,,(4,091.0)
I
.-l
s
APPIJICATION FOR RIVOCABLE
A STRUCTURE ON A
(Please type or Prlnt)
Novernber 9, 1990
TO ERECT OR I.IAINTAIN
RIGHT-OF-WAY
Fence
I{al1
PERMIT
PUBLIC
LandscapLng-
other x
OWNER OF PROPERTI
NAI.{E OF APPLIEANT
Patsv and Pedro Cerisola .
Pamela Hopkinsr/Snowdon & Hopkins - Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, ColoradADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIP1ION OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED:
rnr 29 BIocK 1 suBDrvrsroN vail P.otat-o P3Ich
(If necessary, attaCh descrlption on separate sheet) '
corner lot
-
Inside lot
-
DESCRIPTTON OF STRUCTURE OR ITEil(S) INTO RIGHT-OF-I{AY:Amendment
to the July 30, 1990 application to include tie back els as shown
on Robillard & Associates drawinq dated November 1, 1990.
ProPertY lLne, . sldewalks,-urbs, intakes, hydiants, meters, mlnholes, anl .other affected
appurl"nance in tire projirct area (to scale or-dl.nensioned) and
sLltton(s) as weII as elevations (if appllcable).
Does structure presentlY exlst?Yes
Proposed date for conmencenent of constructlon
In consideration of the issuance of a revocable pennit for the
structure above indicated, appl,icant agrees as follows:
1. That the structure hereLn authorized on a revocable perrnit
basls Ls restrlcted exclusively to the land above descrlbed.
2. That the permit is lirnited specifically to the type of
structure-described in thls application.
3. That the applicant shall notily tbe Town Manger, or his.duly
authorl-zed-igent, twenty-four lrours Ln advance of the tlnre
for cornmencement of constructlon, ln order that proper
J.nspectlon may be made by the Tor,rn.
4. The-appllcant altrees to lndennlfy and hold harnless the Town
"i Vaii, lts ofilcers, employees and agents from-and agalnst
art tlautlltv, claLns and- dernands on account of lnJury, loss
or damage, li.rcludlng without limitatlon c1alus arJ.sing fron
bodily injury, personal lnjury, slckness, disease, death,
propeity ioss-oi darnage, oi any other loss of any klnd
Itralsoever, which arLse out of or are in any manner
connected wlth applicant's activlties pursuant to thls
permit, 1f such iniury, Ioss, or damage Ls.caused Ln whole
br in iart by, or is iiairned to be caused ln whole or ln
part b-y, the-act, onissJ.on, errorr professJ-onal errort -iofst"X'e, negligence or other fault of ttre appllcant, hl-s
contractor or subcontractor or any offJ.cer, employee-or
representative of the applicant, h"is contractor or his
subcontractor. the appileant agrees to lnvestLgate, hand1e'respond to, and to pr-oviae defense for and defend against,
any- such liabtlity, clairns, or dernands at the sole expense
of the appllcant. The appllcant also agrees to bear alL
other expenses relating tirereto, includlng.court costs and
attorney-rs fees, wheth6r or not any such llabtltty,-claims,
or denairds a1leiJed are groundless, fal-se, or fraudulent'
Appllcant aSfge? to procure and maintal-n, at lts own cost, ap9Jr9y or polJ-cJ-es of insurance sufficl-ent to ensure agalnstall liabirity clalms, denands and other obligatlons asiumedby the applicant pursuant to thls paragraph 4.
Appllcants further agree to release the Town of Vail, ltsofficers, agents and ernployees fron any and all llabill.ty,claims, demands, or actions or causes of actions whatsoeierarising out of-any damage, loss or lnJury to the applicant
9r to the appllcantrs property caused by the fown o-f Vall,its officers, altents and employees whife engaged inmaintenance or snovr removal actl.vitles or any-otheractlvit,ies whatsoever on ,Iovrn of Vail property, etreets,sidewalks, or rights-of-way.5. That the pennlt uray be revoked whenever lt ls deternlnedthat the encroachnent, obstruction, or other structureconstitutes a nuisance, destroys or lrnpalrs the use of theright-of-way by the publlc, constitutes a traffl.c hazard, orthe property.upon-which the encroachnent, obEtructlon, orstructure exLsts is requlred for use by the publlc; or itmay be revoked at any tine for any reason deemed sufflclentby the Town of Vail.6. That the applicant will remove, at his expense, theencroachrnent, obstruction, or structure wlthin ten daysafter receLving notice of any revocatl_on of saLd perrnLt.7. That the applicant agrees to rnaintain any landscaplngassociated wlth the encroachment on the right-of-way.8. That in the event sal,d rernoval of the encroachnentr-obstruction, or structure is not acconplished wlthin tendays, the Town is hereby authorized to remove same and havethe right to rrake an assessment agal.nst the property andcollect the costs or removal in the same manner as generaltaxes are coLlected.
\,
9.
l_0.
That the applicant has read
and conditions set forth in and understands all of the termsthis application.Special conditions:
x .4Vo
res)
APPROVED:
Property ownerershlp, both signatu
Developrnent
lD.t
APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE
A STRUCTURE ON A
(Please tl1re or print)
PERI'TIT TO ERECT OR I{AINTAIN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OT'.I{AY
Fence
WaIlIandscaping-Other x
D11g JuIv 30, 1990
OWNER OF pROpER1'y Patsy and Pedro Cerisola
Na11E Ol. AppLICNtT Pamela Hopkins/Snowdon & Hopkins Alchltegts
ADDRESS 201 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Colorado 81657
I,EGAL DESCRTPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED:
Lor 29 BIocK 1 suBDrvrsroN @(If necessary, attach description on aeparate sheet).
Corner lot
-
Inside lot
-
DESCRTI{IION OF STRUCTURE OR ITEM(S) rNTO RrGHT-OF-WAY:
The actual tie backs to the retaining wa1l system to allow for
the Cerisolars driveway.
Attach plans showlng encroachrnent, property line, sidewalks,curbs, lntakes, hydrants, neters, nanholesr ary other affected
appurtenance in the project area (to scale or dinensioned) andsection(s) as well as elevations (if applicable).
Doe6 atructure presently exist? _N9
Proposed date for comnencenent of construction j]llr-lLd93!
In consideration of the issuance of a revocabl.e perrnlt for theetructure above lndicated, applJ.cant agrees as follows:
1. Bhat the structure herein authorlzed on a revocable pernit
basia is reetricted exclusively to the land above described.2. That the permit iE llnited specifically to the type ofstructure deecribed in thiE appllcatlon.3. fhat the applicant ehall notify the Town Manger, or his duly
authorized agent, twenty-four hours in advance of the tinefor cornnencenent of construction, in order that proper
inepectlon nay be nade by the Tonn.4. The applicant agrees to lndennify and hold hannless the Townof Vail, its officers, enployees and agents fron and againstall liabllity, clains and denande on account of inJury, lossor danage, including wlthout lirnitation clains arising fronbodlly lnJury, personal lnjury, eickness, disease, death,property loss or danage, or any other loss of any kind
whatEoever, which arise out of or are in any manner
connected with applicant'E actLvlties pursuant to thispermit, if Euch inJury, Ioss, or damage is cauEed in whoLeor in part by, or is cl.ained to be caused ln whole or inpart by, the act, omission, error, prof,essional error,
rnlstake, negligence or other fault of the applicant, hls
contractor or subcontractor ar any officer, enployee or
representative of the applicant, his contractor or hissubcontractor. The applicant agrees to investlgate, handle
respond to, and to provide defense for and defend agalnst,
any euch liabillty, claims, or dernands at the sole expenseof the applicant. The applicant also agrees to bear all
other expenses relating thereto, including court costs and
attorneyrs fees, whether or not any such J.iability, clairns,or dernands alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent.
Applicant aSlge? to procure and naintain, at ltg orn co"t, a'pglrgy or-poricies of LnEurance sufficient to ensure agaiirstal'l llablllty clarns, denands and other obrigations asiunea-by the appllcant pursuant to thie paragraph i.
Appllcants further lgree to releaee the Town of Vall, ite
1f!,icers, agents and-emptoyees fron any and aff ffiriliat,cralns, denands, or actions or cauaes of actlons wbatEoeierarislng out of.any danage, ross or injury to the apprrcini-or to-the applicantrs property caused by-the town -oi Vall,rEs otttcera, agents and enployees whlle engaged lnmaintenance or Enow renoval- aclivities or aiy-otheractlvltlee whatsoever on Town of VaiI properly, atreets,sldenalka, or rlghts-of-way.5. That the pernit nay be revoked whenever lt is deter:ulnedthat the encroachnent, obstructlon, or other Etructureconstitutes a nuisance, destroys or lmpairs the use of therlght-of-way by the public, constltutei a trafflc hazard, -or
the property.upon.whlch tha encroachnent, obEtruction, oretructure exlEts is reguired f,or use by the publlc; oi ltlay be revoked at any t,lnre for any reason deLned euff,lclentby the Town of ValI.6. That the appllcant wlll renove, at his expense, theencroaehroent, obstructlon, or structure wlthin ten daysafter receivlng notice of any revocatlon of eald pernit.7. That th6 lpplicant agrees to-naintain any landecaiingassoclated with the encroachnent on the itgnt-of-irayi8. That ln the event said removal of the encr6achrnent,-obstruction, or etructure iE not accornprrshed wtthin tendays, the Town is hereby authorized to- renove sane and havethe_rlght- to nake an assessurent against the property andcorlect the coets or trenovar ln the eane naniref aa leneraltax€B are collected.
9.
10.
That the appllcant has readand condltlons eet forth In
and understande aII of the terurEthle appllcatlon.Speclal condltions:
Please notif the Owners before any work begins so that
can coordinate efforts so as to minimize dam
/"
loL4
-.--,-i--
Date /re6) i /
Date
InFnotlnD!
Dl rector
Dl rnnt
p, both slgnatu
Development
It:to
a4b
Dateuanager
\
T
\
oo"
l,
oo h4lIvr
^)1,*'
\ --t
$',)\
il
a
\
\')\\
\
\
\
\
\\ ii\rr$ \f-r \MR \+
s
(
?
s
\"\i
rS
)'
$
$t-r.
-t
$
\r.\t,F
\
v'rS-l7(
\
1
\--\
\\
t
.{.
$I
r
0
4
\$.
\
t\\
\
\
\
\k
'+^\
:-*
t$
TN
$$,-oz
'J.\\
\\
\\I
-.,.t \\\
ffi$
h\
I
{r
\t
{
1
$u
\\-
t,'
_N
It\
-t -_I-
il
tt."r-{
:t't!.-t
L' i\ + -'d.-
j
1t
t
t
.i,t
I
+#,K
+I
.Jf
\s:b+
NN
s
$s
$. r.-s\\P
, i'
+*
8J7
*, Al'
I
-<-L
La.4l'a
,I!a -rr4
TI.Ynof
d,i
,lt =umH;
$
N-t\T,|.\' , t:l tt
:-. 't'\
\\! - ,,T tll
4
Al
$\.R\il
T.s\F
5
s
sl$s-
)EL
s+
Nsqc.
s
F
t
St.-_
N
\\
\
$
$$
us$
fitr\ii\(
JN
xN
If
tf!
tJ
$
\
\
:\:.S\
$
N
3
\^
\
o
.r\'
KN
N
$
o
,-.
-
+
qteu 'b-
-L/1U
Il' -.g
3
v.Ill
,.p
a/t
ts
v
.rl
{u
j
.l
$s-$J$
s\i
s
o&t+I
Fss
\\*
7,J$o"
to
=gAAs
N
\
€E\
s
\
/"3
il/'{rt-$K$t\tAS s,!
,17
k/
bI
3
-o
II
t,aq.
3,,.4
V ttr
o
I
g
C
)A-
\
I
o
'5
dtIl
EIt
j -,'
4o
sj?
Jl
j
to
fr's
J\
slI
I
II
\
\
I+
a
,
F.htsI
e,
$f"J t..
I
U
I
U
t
I NTEP..OEP.qRTNENTAL REVI Et.|
P?OJECT:
D.(TE SUSI,IITTED: j . rz .so
COI."'IENTS IIEEDED 8Y:
ERIEF OESCRIPTION OF TTE PROPOSAL:
DATE OF PUELIC HEARING 7.23 .?A
dollA ,[ 4" b*-L' D* *%
POLICE DEPARTT4ENT
Revievred by:
Connerrts:
REEiEAIiOII DEPARTI.::NT
t
'tr'
..!j;
Revie'aed.by:
Cor:uents:
"r" Tf,rfro .
D Altil y-se'j,-" -f A/"^
Date
Date
t'
PIANNTNG AND EM/IRONIIENTAL COUMISSION
July 23, 1990
Present
chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Connie Knight
Ludwig Kurz
Jirn Shearer
Kathy Warren
Dalton Willians
StaffKristan Pritz
l,lLke Uollicashelly ltello
Andy lGtudtsenJill Kannerer
Betsy Rosolack
Penny Perry
Susan Scanlan
In the lnterest of time, work sessionE were held prlor to tbe
publJ-c hearing.
A work sessLon for an amendment to Town of Vail Ordlnance No. 24'
susan scanlan presented the proposal as per the staff memo.
A work session for a conditLonal use oernit an9 a,setback
variance for a remediation system equinment building at thq
alpine stanaara stition. earl of f,ot e. vait vltlacre zna fllinq.
285 s. Frontacre Road west.Applicant: Arnoco Corp.
Ton McCurdy, representing the Anoco Corporation, responded to the
issues addiessed in the neno explaining that contamination was
found on the Gateway site. However, they dld not yet know the.
extent. After talklng with staff, Amoco chose the proposed site
because it would cause the Least hardship for all concerned slnce
any other location deleted parking spaces. Regardlng alternate
neLhods, the proposed design was the best for ttre situatj-on. It
was possible they would need larger wells, however, they had
already allowed for additLonal apace in the room for an
additional air stripper. Amoco orlginally proposed to use a
portable building. He said that staff had cornmunicated concerns
Ltrat a portable building would not neet design criterla.
negarding the use of ttri Gateway site rather than the Alpine
Stindard site, the present owner dld not want them to use the
basement as ltas originally planned. lhe owner had ex;lressed
concerns of liability and parking.
Series of 1983 and Ordinance No. 28. SerLes of 1987 governlng
'l
Chuck Crist asked how noiey the systen would be and Tom litcCurdy
explained that the only noise would be generated by a compressor.
The conpressor would be withln an enclosed building and the
inpact would be ml-nLnal . He felt the noise from the highway
would be more obtruslve.
Chuck then asked, lf the problen was more extenslve thanoriginally thought, would Anoco have to bulld another etation
else where? Frou what dLstance could the wells be punped?
Ton ltcCurdy explalned the welle could punp up to 200-250 feet
away.
Dalton and Ludwig had no comenta.
Diana asked how deep they tested the water and Tom UcCurdy
explained they test anlnrhere fron 20 to 4Or below the ground
surfac.e.
Diana alEo asked holr much water would be processed in 1 day and
Tom Mccurdy explalned that the systen processed 35 9a11ons per
ninute. biana was concerned about how the water and Sanitation
department would handle the situation and how it would affect the
Townrs water supply. Tom uccurdy explained that the water would
be discharged to the t{ater and Serrer plant and t}re water plant
discharged to the Townrs streans. tte did not feel that 35
gallons a ninute would affect the water supply.
Kathy warren asked Ton Briner, the architect for the project, if
they would be able to bem on either side of the buLlding and Ton
stated ttyestt, on the sides but not the front or rear.
Diana felt that the applicant should consider extra insulation to
nitigate the noise. She asked Kristan if thiE would be an
oppoitunlty to clean the island/area up and Shelly renlnded Diana
ana tne boird that there is a possibil'ity of a eidewalk as well.
Tom llcCurdy explained that there was an unidentlfled easenent and
Diana felt that it was an lssue that staff could handle and
inforn the board if it would be a problen at the next neeting.
Shelly felt that ttre Town needed to Eee the final reports when
they -ane out before naklng a recommendation and Tom.Uccurdy
did;'t feel the final reports would affect the location of the
building. He felt the present neeting was to center around tlre
aesthetics, noise etc.
chuck Criet asked how the air diEcharge was done and tf it
requlred stacks. Tom Uccurdy explained that vents would be used.
Chuck also wanted to know lf there would be an odor and Ton
ttccurdy explained tlrat the odor would be no rnore than the gas
station itself.
I
Bruce GiIIy, rePresenting the Holiday House, s$!3a that the
ounere were ltorrtta iUou€ the properly value.going down due to
fi;-;;"i;nlnation-[nil-ipp.are-a t-o be-under the Holidav House-. -bulldlng. rney wouid lr-ka to see the area cleaned up. -They did
want to knos if there uas danger. They dldnlt want to find gas
in their Uasenenil--i"- i"X"a, -if they irsed the existlng welIs,
fr"r-Ifr"-pff"r ,ouia be latd ind Ton frcCurdy explained that the
pipes wouta all be undergrounded.
Jirn Shearer asked lf the funes fron the air discharge vould be
flammable and Bon t'lcCrrrdy answered rrno'rr
Diana Donovan Etated that in general Ehe felt the proposal was a
rrnecessary evil. n
The Planning and Envl'ronnental Conmission public- neeting was
called to orcler at zifo p.n. by Dlana Donovan' Cha5'rperson'
Iate, Item No. 1 \tas PostPoned to
Ullt€ troUlca explained that the appligalt? y:r: r:Suesting a '.variance fron a riifror allowabliirall helght to provide for the
construction of "-i"il-"f"gl" iitify home. -The variance requested
wourd allow ror waii rr-fg6ts rangtirg from 3.^feet to 1o's feet in
heisht. The averi;; ;id" of tlr6 15t beneath the proposed
residence and clrivtway wls approxinately Sot: In order to access
the site, the appJ-icairts were-p""p".i"g a dliveyay vtth a rnaxirnum
g;ia.-"t'e*. Tir;-;a;ii-recornLndition-was for approval of the
variance request;d-i"i-"-r"ximum wall height of 10.5 feet per the
a".ri""r r"fi^itt"a.--stiri Uettevea the r-guest would not be a
ffiii"ii"g. and would not be detrimental to the
publlc health, t.?.-y or-welfare' The topographic conditions of
the site created-u"i'.f"" developnent consi-tleiations, and.the. staff
betieved that a h;;Ghip would-be- inposed upon the applicant if
the strict and lia;;;i-iniertrrretatio-n of thL zonlng.code -t:t9--t?
be enforced. Th;-fi;dings sirpporting the variance included rv A'
B, and c2.
Pan Hopkins, representing the applicant, agreed.with the Etaff
presentation. sn.-.ipi"inea thilr f! thg.architect on the
;;];;;;-l[ii'tri;a ve-ry rrara.to avoid askins for a variance.
Hor ever, "*."rr=r.iJ eoii iesting deened the variance request
necessary. Pam explained the type-of roaterials to be used in
constructing trre wiii ana showed-photograplt ?1|^:Ianples' :lt"
added that the "ppir.a"i had upgrided €,ne- landscaping since the
original proPosal.
Since
t
Chuck Crist asked what color the wall was proposed to be and Pan
ansgered ttgre1r . rl
Connie Knight explained that she had seen Georges Boyer, an
adJacent pioperty ouner' ln the roon earlier and asked lf he was
foi or against the proposal and llike explained that he wanted to
rnake sure the hone was Proposed solely on the ownersr land, that
it would not encroach lnto the open apace tract Lnnediately
adJacent, which lt did not.
condition:
Landscapinq be uporaded to the followl'nq;
5 12r-14t Endleman SDruce
2 12r-14r BIue sDruce
6 3n-4n caliPer AsPen
VOTE: 7.0 IN FAVOR
,, .,, .- !
.. 1
A motl.on to anorove the recnreeted wall helqht variance oer
the staff neno wlth the condltlon lLsted below saE nade bv
Kathv Warren and seconded by Chuck CrLst.
Applicant: Jerry Farcnrhar
Andy Knudtsen presented the proposal explaining-that the
appiicant proposed to bulld a sun room on an existing deck- in
flont of his single fanily residence. The sun room would be 16
feet by 12 feet ind would be located 1n front of the living_ roon
of the residence. The existing structure currently encroached
3r-6n into the west side yard setback and the applicant proposed
to allgn the new addltion-with the existing house, creatlng a
sinilai setback encroachnent. The staff reconmendatlon was for
approval of the requested variance. Because the existl.ng house
wll in the setbaqk creating a physical trardship, the onner
desenred relief fron the strlct eetback requirement. The
variance would not be a grant of speclal privilege as the tlpe of
sl-tuation was Justification for other variances in the-past. -There would be no negative lnpacts on adJacent propertl'es. The
related findlng included Iv A' B, cl and C2.
Itern No. 3:
Meadow Ridoe Road
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&'ECT:
Plannlng and Environmental Connl.ssion
Conmunity Development Departrnent
JuIy 23, 1990
I.
*'**
A request for a variance from the wall height
requirement on l,ot 29, Block 1, Vail Potato Patchi 805
Potato Patch Drive.Apptlcants: Patsy and Pedro Cerisola
DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REOUESTED
The appllcants are the owners of Lot 29, Block I, Vall
Potato-Patch (805 Potato Patch Drive) and are reguestlng a
varl.ance frorn-a rnaxinum allowable wall height to provide for
the constructj.on of a new single fanil'y home on the lot.
The variance reguested woula ittow for walI heights ranglng
from 3 feet, up to 10.5 feet in height.
Section 18.58.020 (c) of the Town of VaiI zoning code allows
for a maxinum wall height of 3 feet within the front setback
area, and up to 6 feet on any other area of the property.
This section of the code reads as follows:
rrFences, hedges, walls, and landscaping screens, ghere
not restrictea by covenant or other legal instrunent,
shall- not exceed three feet in height within any
required front setback area and shall not exceed sl'x
te6t in height on any other portion of a siter.provided
that higher-fences, hedges, walls, or landscaping
screens nay be authorized by the zoling adninistrator
where nece-sary to screen public utility eguiprnent. No
barbed wire or-electrically charged fence shall be
erected or maintained.rl
134 feet of the proposed retaining wall nould be within the
front setback area lnd 51 feet would be out of the front
setback area. All of the wall is on the applicantrs
property.
The average slope of this lot beneath the proposed reEidence
and driveway ls-approxlnately 50 percent. -In order to
access the 3lte, LLe appllcants ale proposing a drJ-veway
sith a naximum grade of 8 Percent.
II. ZONTNG CONSIDER,ATIONS
A. This lot is located within the
Residential zone district.
B. The adJacent land uses are as
L. North - Potato Patch Road
zoned Priroary/Secondary.
Prinary/Secondary
follows:
and L'ots 5 t 6, both
2. South - Tract A, zone Agricultural & open space'
3. East - Tract A, zoned Agrlcultural & open Space'
4. t{est - Lot 30' zoned Priroary/Secondary.
III. CRITERIA AND TINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Flndings, section 18.62.060 of
tire vail Munlcipal code, the Department of Connunlty.
Development rec-omrnends approval- of the requested variance
based upon the following factors:
A.Conslderation of Factorg:
1. The relationshfic of the recruested variFnce,to
@ential uses and structures in
the vicinitv.
The requested variance, lf approved' would-not
adversdly affect the use or enJolnrent of adJacent
properti6s and would not block or inpede vl'ews
lroin any surrounding properties. llhe westernmost
retaining wall would be alnost entirely ecreened
frorn vlew by the sltlng of the resldence (see
attached site plan). PortlonE of the eastern
retainl-ng waII-wouid be visible fron properties
Iocated Eelow thls lot. Houever' the applicants
have proposed to heavlly landscaPe the area
inrnediatily below and in front of the retainlng
wall . The-applicantrs are proposlng to bre-ak up
the nass of the wall with the planting of three 8-
foot Englenen aPruce, one 6-foot-Blue epruce, and
three :linch caliper aspen irn:nediately ln front of
the wall.
All retainlng walls wlll be flnished wlth a etone
veneer facinq, and this treatment w111 natch the
sinilar finiiir on the exterior of the resldence,
uhich we believe wll'l provide a unified aPpearance
on the lot.
2.
The topographic conditionE on th16 lot are such
itrat tire-uuitaaute area of the slte I's very-we1l
deflned. Because the average slope on the lot
approxiuates 5ot, acceEs onto this site is
;-"i;;;rt-airii",irt. The applicants are proposins
a drlvewiy with an average grade of 8 percent,
vhich the-etaff consideri a reasonable grade to--
access the property. llhe proposed retalning- walls
iie-nece"sa-ry io sirpport giades both above the
driveway and below the drivewaY'
The Planning staff belleves that the proposed
retaJ.ning watts are necessary to-ensure
;6;iii";tion of the slopes ind Potato Patch Road'
ata t. feel that the proposal is reasonable and
c"itafnry necessary on this steep slte' The
applicanis have re-searched using a 3t tiered wall,
ii-"ia"t to avoid requesting a variance, however'
tne-ioff" analysls and bearing pressures fronr
Potato Patch Road would struciuially not allow for
such a design.
3.
The staff finds that
frave no signiflcant
considerations.
the reguested varlance vill
J:npact uPon anY of the above
IV. EIND:INCS
A.That the grantlng of lhe variance n111 not constitute a
iii"t "i ipt"i"r-privilege inconsistent with the
itrit.tion-s on otitet prolertieE classLfied in the same
district.
That the Eranting of the variance wiII not be
a"iiir."tir to tfe pubric health, safety or welfare' or
;;;;;i;iii-r"j""io"-=-[o-pr"pertlis or inprovements in
the vicinitY.
B.
v.
C. That the variance is warranted for one or nore of the
following reasons:
1. The strLct llteral interpretation or enforcement
of the speclfied regulation would result in
practica-l difficutty or unnecessary PlrVsicathardshlp Lnconsistent wlttr the objectives of this
title.
2. There are exceptlons or extraordinary
clrcunstances or conditlons appllcable to the same
slte of the varlance that do not apply generally
to other propertles Ln tlre aame zone.
3. The strlct lnterpretatlon or enforcement of the
speclfled regrulallon would deprive the appllcant
of prlvilegei enJoyed by the.onners of other
properties in the same distrl'ct.
STATF RECOMMENDATION
The staff reconmendation is for approval of the variance
reguest for a maxinun waII height of 10.5 feet' -per the
driwings subnitted by Snowdon and Hopkins, Architects, Sheet
a-1, dited JuIy 13, 1990. l{e believe the reguest would not
be i grant of -speciat privilege and that the variance would
not b6 detrinenlal to Lhe public health, safety or welfare.
The topographie conditions of thiE slte have created some
very uiriiue-developnent considerations, and the Plannlng
sta?f beiieves that a hardship would be imposed upon the
applicant if the strict and ti.teral J.nterpretation of the
z-oiring code were to be enforced. The strlct lnterpretation
;i a# wait teight linits would nake it vlrtually inpossible
to access the slte. pindings supporting the variance are IV
A, B, C2.
The Design Review Board has reviewed this reguest, at_ their
June 6, iggo neetlng, and by a unaninous vote of 3-o has
concepiually approv6i tfre proposal with the conditlon that
if a iarian-ce iion the nax-irnun wall helght is requlred, that
be obtained from the PEC. The soils analysis, which were
needed to determlne the exact waII heights, were not
available at the tine of the DRB revlert.
Iu
--f\'-
+i
q\
\-D-'-
\
tt\
'1 \
T
-rt5'si$.I. --\{'l r.--h --\i is- --
-itt1{
tiIS
i{r-rr-{l,:
Il
R3
:li
rdt
\
+
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that the Planning and Environnental
Connission of the Town of Vail wilt hoLd a public hearing in
accordance wlth Section 18.66.060 of the nunicipal code
Town of vait on July 23, 1990 at 2:0o p.[. in the Town
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
of the
of Vail
A request for a conditional use pernit for a rTelevision
Stationr in the Cornmercial Core II zone district located at
I€t 2, Block 1, VaiI Lionshead 3rd Filing, Sunbird Lodge,
675 Lionshead Place.Applicant: Vailr/Beaver creek Television Network.
A reguest for an exterior alteration, a site coverage
variance, a height variance, a landscape variance and a
floodplain nodification on Lot C and Lot D, and the
southwesterly 4 feet of Lot B, all in Block 5-8, Vail
Vlllage lst Filing, 227 Bridge Street.Applicant: Hillis of Snonmass, Inc. and Bruce Ann &
Associates.
A request for an exterior alteration and a landscape
varLance in order to construct an addition to the BelI Tower
Building at 201 Gore Creek Drive, Part of Tract A, Block 58,
VaiI Village 1st Filing.Applicant: Hermann Staufer - Lancelot Restaurant
A request for a side setback variance in order to construct
an addition to a single fanily structure 3-L/2 feet lnto the
western side yard setback located at Lot 16' Buffehr Creek
Subdivision, 1879 lteadow Ridge Roadlpplicant: Jerry Farquhar
A reguest for a conditional use pemit in order to expand
office space for a nagnetic resonance inaging system and a
satellite dish at the vail valley lledical Center, Lots E and
F, Vail VilJ-age 2nd Filing, 181 West Meadow Drive.Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center
A request for a landscape variance in order to provide two
addifional parking spaces on the souttrern portion of Tract
G, Vail Village 2nd Filing, 17 VaiI Road.
Applicant: First Bank of Vail
A request for a side setback variance at Lots 1-5, Block 5
Vait Vitlage 1st Filing, Unit 3B--Vail RowhouseE, 303 Gore
creek Drive.Applicant: Stewart Colton
A request for a condj,tional use pernit and a setback
variance for a rernediation systern equipment building at the
Alpine Standard Station, part of Lot A, Vail Village 2nd
Filing, 285 s. Frontage Road lfest lApplicant: Amoco Corp. n | ,1 '.r I ' I
\v lat ftJ/--t '' I tt lq Cb "//;,'-t ft-2 ry.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. A request for a site coverage variance at Lot 31, Block 7,Vail Village lst Filing, 84 Beaver Dam Road.Applicant: H. Ross Perot
10. A reguest for an anendment to Town of Vail ordinance No. 24,
Series of 1983 and ordinance No. 28, series of 1987
governing wood-burninq fireplaces, gas logs, and gas
appliances.Applicant: Tordn of Vail
11. A reguest for a najor amendnent to SDD No. 15, part ofparcel A, Lionsridge subdivision, Flting 2. (The Valley
Phase III)Applicant: Brad & susan TJossem
L2. A request for a varlance fror tbo vall helEht reguirernent onI,.t 29, Block 1, vall Potato Patctr; 805 Potato Patch Drive.Appllcant: Patsy and Pedro Cerl-eola
13 A request for a rnajor subdivision, to approve theprelirninary plan, a reguest for a variance to the maximum
height for retaining walls, and a reguest for a variance to
the rnaxinurn percent grade for a road, on a parcel conrnonly
referred to as Spraddle Creek, an aPproxirnate 40 acre parcel
Iocated north and east of the Main Vail I-70 interchange and
east of the Spraddle Creek livery.Applicant: George Gillett, Jr.
14. A request for a major aroendnent to SDD No. 4, Coldstream
Condorniniuns in order to anend Sections 18.46.090 (B)
density, 18.46.100 (B) floor area, 18.45.22o emp]oyee
housing and 18.46.23o time reguirements to convert existing
racquetball facility into an employee housing unit,
management office, laundry and owner storage area at Lot 53
clen Lyon Subdivision, 1476 westhaven Drive.Applicant: Coldstream Condoninium Association.
15. A request to amend the Vail Municipal Code Section 18.04 to
add a definition for a brew pub and a request to amend the
Commercial Service Center Zone District 18.28 to allow a
brew pub as a per:rnitted use.Applicant: Dean Liotta
The applications and information about the proposals are
available for public inspection in the Conmunity Developnent
Department office.
Town of vail
Conmunity Development Department
Published in the VaiI Trail on July 11., 1990.
r. d'
Appr ication ouru)q|r| ll: ,-
l,- t.
PEc MEETTNc oNE blbqllo
FOR A VARIANCEAPPLICATION
I.Thls
wll l
A.
procedure ls requlred for any proJect requestlng a varlance. The appllcatlon
not be accepted until all information {s submitted.
NAME OF APPLICANT lnpt
AooREss A/o d 2m
$t7t
B.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIV
ADDRES' k
puow 47b - /.4/
c. NAME 0F ol.lNER(S)llor print)
ADOilESS
PHONE
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS
E.
F.
rE B
THE F
YOUR
,4a2\($toY
dFmsr gE
PROPOSAL.
,oro 4 cK #7-
LEGAL nEscRrprroN tor fu etocKJL _Fr unc l/arl fdzfu fzhlt
FROM
PAIO 'SEFORE THE COI4i4UN ITY DEVELOPHENT OEPARTNENT }IILL ACCEPT
A 'llst of the names of owners of all property
INcLUDTNG pR0pERTY qEHIt'!0 AND AcRoss brREErs',
THE AppLrcANT tlrLL BE RESporrsrsiE F0n-cosiEii
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE t.lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEI,IBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTEDT0.)oETERr'llNE IF ANI'ADoITI0NAL tHroarrniloH- ii xeEoLD.-Ho-ApFircAiiolr-irIi aEACCEPTED uNLEss IT-ls_coMPLqiq (ItusI tHiluoe nil-iiins REQUTRED By THE zoNrNG
^9!lN!llR4i9ll.
-- II Is rHs Rppt- icANT' a nEiFoNlia ri iiv ro-unxe-An-npiijinirrenrHrTH THE 5TAFF T0 FrNo ouT Rsour nooriroHnr-lleHiiini nequrnEminri. -'"''
iblilinuiiiilillpi:ffii!:hlitii:i,'tbh,iT?5i!:ii:^lir,0ti^?xtiit?,Fii_r!ft.'AN0 ENVIROt{i"lEN1AL cor'lirlssloN uV-s'lrpuinrel -ALi-ioHotttons
0F AppRotlAL l'lusr BEcompLtED r.trTH BEFoRE A BUtLDTNG pin;rri-'ii-issuEo. --"-
adjacent to the subJect property
and their mai'ling addresses,
MAILING AODRESSES.
Snowdon and Hopkins o Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-220'l
Vail, Colorado 81657
uay 29, 1990
l.{r. }like ]tol1ica
Town of vail Planning DePartment
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL, CO 81658
Mike:
As you and Pam discussed last week the appticant--is submitting an
ippiication for a variance for Lo1, 29, nlock 1-, Vail Potato Patch,
VaiI, Colorado to allow for an increase in a retaining wall height
"Oo.t" 3 feet in the front setback as per section L8'58'020 of the
supplernentary regulations of the Toldn of Vail Zoning Ordinance'
As per secE].olt i8.54.02n, tlj-Ell,cloG ar-E-tr-oEFlf,.E a ltqB f'd
lggai[fqt ng tn;Ig;;-;rf.!l 6-!-I f;tt td -rZ teo€ tn heiqltt on the
;;hfti--Ide of ine ier driveway. This request wiII allow the
aiplicant to have reasonable (ea) drive access, and allow the house
abiign to stay ritftit the required maximum height for residential
construction. The najority o-r this waII would be hidden fron view by
;i;;fu the residence-betwlen the wall and nost public view areas' As
can be seen on the site plan, there is a drop of 10 to 1-2 feet to just
get to the 20 foot front-setback line. To then acconmodate a 20 to 24
ioot deep garage places the downhill.edge of the garage floor.slab 25
feet above naturai grade. By accessing the garage via the extended
drive fron the easti we are iUte to drop that elevation bY L2 to 1"5
feet and make a reasonable design solution. These 3 lots along the
".,rrr. are probabiy the rnost difficult to access fron Potato Patch
prive and is prolirty why they are so late in developing'
Because the requested variance in wall height is hidden by the
pi"p"r.a iesia6nce, it,s inpact on adjacent properties and the general
iuuiic (risht , alr', etc. ) i3 minirnal. r hop- that Y?l,til]--?::-:lt=5r-"-n"ias6ip'on tiris property, not as granting special privileges to
the applicant.
Page 2
Mr. Mike MoIIica
tqay 29, 1990
I hope this is adequate infornation to start the review process for
pfC.' I arn hoping €frat this item can be placed on_ your regularly
scheduled ,fune ZStn rneeting. Please catl if you have any questions or
need additional infornation.
Sincerely,
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
hmqftfuru,nlrt
Craig N. snowdon
Partner
CNN/sth
A r, r ^|} o M M r r M E N r I
SCHEDULE A
Application No. VLSL37-4
For fnfornation OnIy
LOT 29 VAIIJ POTATO PATCH
- Charges -ALTA O$rner policy $499.00raxcertitr -rorol- - ,li3:BB
With your remittance please refer to V15137_4.
1. Effectlve Date: April 18, l99o at 8:Oo A.M.
2, Pollcy to be issued, and proposed Insured:
rrALTArr Orirnerrs poligy
$2SOTOOO.OOForm 8-1970 (Arnended- 1O_1Z_ZO)
Proposed Insured:
ITARCH, S.A., A PANAI,IANIAN CORPORATION
3 ' The estate or interest in the rand described, or referred to inthig Cornrnltment and covered--herein is:
A Fee Sirnple
4' Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at theeffective date hereof vested in:
N{JA, INC., A COIORADO CORPORATTON
5' The tand referred to in this connitment is described asfollowe:
IPT 29' BroeK L---v-llL/porA'o pATcH' AccoRDrNG To rHE RE..RDEDpIAT THEREOF, COUNTy bF EAGLE; STATE OF COLORADO.
]AGE ].
A L r ^1" o M M r r M E N r
SCHEDULE B-1
(Requirenents)
The foll.owing are the reguirenents to be
L. Paynent to or for the account of thethe full consideration for the est,atelnsured.
Proper J.natrunent(s) creating the estate or interest to beinsured must be exetuted. and-duiy fired eor recoid, to-wit:
RELEASE oF DEED oF lRusr DATED March 07, 1988, FRoM ANJA, rNc., A coLoRADoCORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRSTBANKoF vArL To sEcuRE THE suM oF gr4o,ooo.oo REcoRDED apiii or,-rgiir, rN BooK481 AT PAGE 5I.4.
SAID DEED OF TRUST I{AS FURTHER SECURED TN ASSIGNUENT OF RENTS RECORDEDAprll 01, 1988, IN BOOK 481 AT pecs srs.
EVTDENCE SATTSFACTORY TO raND TrrLE GUARANTEE COMPANY THAT TJARCH, S.A. rs APANAI,'ANIAN QRPOR,ATION .
I
CERTTFTED coPY oF REsoLUTToN oF THE covERNrNG BoARD oF r.ARcH, s.A., APANN!'ANTAN coRPoRAIroN' (AUTHORrzrNG THE ExEcurroN oF THE NEcEssARyDocuMENTs) ' sArD RESoLUTioN MUsr BE pRopERLy cERirrrED By AN oFFrcER oF THECORPORATION WITH IHE CORPORATE SEAL AFFIXED. SAiO RESOLUTION MUST BESUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY I,AND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY BUT NEED NoT BERECORDED.
EVTDENCE sABrsFAcroRy ro rHE coMPANy rHAT THE TERMS, coNDrrroNs ANDPROVTSTONS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
'ARR,ANT'
DEED FROM_IIIA. INC., A coLoRADO COR'ORATTON TO LARCH, S.A., APANAMANIAN CORPORATION CONVEYiNG SUBJECT PNOPENIY.
THIS PROPERTY TS SUBJECT TO THE JOINT RESOLUTION AND NOTICE OF ENCUMBRANCEoF UPPER EAGLE VALLEY coNsoLrDATED sANrrATroN orsinrct AND vArL vALLEycoNsoLrDArED WATER DrsrRrcr nnConoeo JANUARY 1g, 1990 rN BooK 521 AT pAGE44t.
TH' COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE REQUTRES RETURNADDRESSES ON DOCUI.TENTS SENT FOR RECORDING! !
Application No. V15137-4
complied with:
grantors or mortgagors ofor interest to be
3.
4.
5.
6.
IAGE
A L r ^3 o M M r r rr{ E N r
SCHEDULE 8.2
(Exceptions)Application No. V15137-4
:l?'!-91_i:y, or policies to be issued witl_ contain exceptions to therorrowtng unreEs the same are disposed of to the satiiraction oi---the Conpany:
1. standard Exceptions 1 through 5 prlnted on the cover sheet.
5' TaxeE and assessnents not yet due or payabJ.e and speciarassessnents not yet certified to the tr6asurerrs otfice.
7, Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said. Land.
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
9. RICHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED 8Y THE AUTHORITY OF THEUNTTED STA"ES As RESERVED rN UNTTED sTATEs PAiENT RECoRDED July t3, Lg3g,IN BOOK 123 AT PAGE 517
10. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTERCI,AUSE, BUT oMITTTNG REsTRIcTIoNs, IF AN';- gilseo oN RACE, colpR, RELIGT9N,oR NATToNAL oRrGrN, As coNlArNED iN TNsTRUMENT nnconosD l,tarch 05, Lg?4, rNBOoK 233 AT PAGE 628 AND AS AMENDED IN INsTnUl.fnrvf REcoRDED septenber 24,I975t IN BOOK 241 At PAGE gso.
11' urrLrEY EASEI{ENT THTRTY FEET rN I4TrDTH ALoNG THE sourHERLy r,oT rJrNE oFsu&tEcr PRoPERTY As sHoI{N oN THE RECoRDED pu,i or vArL/poTATo pATcH.
12' EAsEllENTs, RESERVATToNS AND REsTRrcTroNs As sHowN oR RESERVED oN THERECORDED PLAT oF VAIL/PoTATO PATCH.
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISTONS OF THE JoTNT REsoLUTIoN AND NoTIcE oFENCIIMBRANCE oF UPPER EAGLE var,r,gv coNsolrDAino senrrarroN DrsrRrcr AND vArtvALr/EY coNsoLrDATED WATER DrsrRrcr REeoRDED Jawuenv ra, 1990 rN BooK 521 ATPAGE 441.
NorEs uPoN EVTDENCE sATrsFAcroRy ro rHE coMpANy rHAr sArD ENcuMBRANcE HAsBEEN PAID IN FULL, SAID ExcEPTIoN 'TLL BE-ociiltnn.
PAGE
ALr^SoMMrrr,rENr a
SCHEDULE 8.2
(Exceptions) Application No. V1S13Z-4
PAGE 3
sNowDoN & HoPKrNs ol|,rra*
201 Gore Creek Drive
vArL, coLoRADO 816s7
LETTil @F TRANSNNIT]TAL
the following items:
tr Specifications
TO
il
D
Plans E Samples
WE ARE SENDING vOU ! Attached D Under separat€ cover via
tr Shop drawings
b coot of letter
pl erints
tr Change order
coPrEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
4 q liq lls /fufu. t/lrut
4
I I hrLtlsu Pt'.J. --)r' /1.**-I 5lt4l'ln ./,/o/lrt-t krn fr"/f
I 5/i4/q o I 7fu rhrt z.n'* z+zn l; azh r1.,
/4/ ii /4t 4 W'
/,/'4iq"I ffi ltww ttiltvvtfu)p
I firlfq"I lrle*L i4 'qlzs I /
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I For approval
! For your use
! As requested
.b For review and comment
tr FOR BIDS DUE
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Returned for corrections
E Resubmit-copies for approval
! Submit-copies for distribution
E Return
-corrected
prints
!
tr
tr
tr
19- D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
rnooJoraoz /@,E. gd. k ol|7l tl andoautaa aaa not aa rlo',ad, hrndly arolt lt ata at onca.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoTfCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plannlng and Environmental
Conmissl-on of the Town of VaiI will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.050 of the municipal code of the
Town of Val.l on June 25, 1990 at 2:oo p.m. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
A r€quest for an exterior alteratlon and a landscape
variance in order to construct an addition to the BeIl Tower
Building at 201 Gore Creek Drive, Part of Tract A, Block 58Vail Village 1st Filing.Applicant: Hermann Staufer - Lancelot Restaurant
A request for a conditional use peroit to
allow for a Bed and Breakfast at Lots 5 and L/2 of 5, Block
5, Vail Village Seventh Filing, 1119 E. Irtarmigan Road.
Applicant: Monie s. BeaI
A request for a conditional use per:mit to
atlow for a Bed and Breakfast at Lot 8, Block 3, Eighorn
Subdivi.sion, sth Addition, 5198 Gore Circle.Applicant: John and Paula Canning
A request for a conditional use permit for a construction
staging area, located just uphill of the Golden Peak
snowrnaking punphouse, Tract B, VaiI Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
Prelininary review for an exterior alteration in Commercial
Core f, for the following property (60 to 90 day study
period) :
Covered Bridge Building - Lot C and Lot D' and the
southwesterly a feet of Lot B, all in Block 5-B, Vail
VilLage lst Filing, 227 Bridge street.Applicant: HiIIis of Snowmass, Inc.
A request for a variance fron the wal1 height requirement on
r-ot rg, Block 1, Vail Potato Patcht 8o5 Potato Patch Drive.
Appllcant: Patsy and Pedro Cerieola
A reguest for an amendrnent to the Townrs zoning code to addItTelevision Stationrr as a conditional use in the Conmercial
Core II zone district, Section 18.25.010Applicant: Vailr/Beaver Creek Television Network.
A request for a conditional use pemit for a deck expansion
at the Sweet Basil restaurant, Iocated on Tract A, Block 58,
vail village lst Filing, 193 East Gore creek Drive.
Applicant: Kevin Clairer/Chuck Rosenquist
6.
7.
8.
%b&/,A a-lor^/ Gt<r',.p-a *, 6A/qo
9. A request for an amendment to SDD No. 23, VaiI National. Bank, Part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village 2nd Fiting, 108S. Frontage Road West.
Appllcant: VaiI Natlonal Bank Building Corp.
10. A request for a side yard eetback variance at 4247 ColunbineDrive, unit #20, Bighorn Terrace.
Applicant: John Nilsson
11. A request for a front setback varl.ance and a creek setback
variance for Lot 6, Vail Village l{est, Filing No. 2, L755
I{est Gore Creek Drive.Applicant: Dan and Karen Forey
L2. A request for a conditional use petnit and a height variancein order to construct an antenna at the Vail Municipalbuilding, 75 South Frontage Road.Applicant: Tohtn of Vail Police Departnent
13. A request for a major subdivision, a request to approve theprelirninary plan, a reguest for a variance to the maximum
height for retaining walls, and a request for a variance to
the maxinum percent grade for a road, on a parcel connonly
referred to as Spraddle creek, an approximate 40 acre parcel
located north and east of the uain Vail I-70 interchange and
east of the Spraddle Creek livery.Applicant: George Gillett, ilr.
14. A reguest for a work session on the Sonnenalp remodel and
proposed Special DeveloPment District at 2o Vail Road, Partof Lot L, Block 5-8, Vail Village lst Filing.Appllcant: sonnenalp Properties, Inc.
The applications and information about the proposals are
available for public inspection in the Conmunity Developnent
Department office.
Town of VaiI
Connunity Development Department
Published in the vail Trail on June I' 1990.
olnlN
I
,hlyunl fu,f*\
:lul U,llor! I ,VFF i
llall , Johrn nd $huvrfu
5hl,rrio )ohn fionor
lfloohonia buw\ PA
J
,l'ilt n ,ftloak I ,VfF o
porlar,bwv4wn
",,n(.0! hti 'LTtfi '
l/ail
tl,sl u ,Vlook I
louo\,1^ M ,
'v(r '
uilq
,khvrl,tlvsg
1Qw0 n(
,fvzol h ,blooV I , VFF .
Vi'l hq'oti"fus,lw .
P n. ftlt,1
\lirl , hlpyv), slbql
lwuw,, , h,vrsola Yuiltwo (Vr+ r,q, plt I I Vff )
l1t sE
o
DtrFHRTMtrNT @FE@MMUNITV DtrVtrL@FMENT
TXXXXXX :ALEs AcroN FORM XXXXXXX
I
o
department of community developmentbox 10O
vail, colorado 81657
1303) 47&s613
February 5, 1982
A'l l en Tafoya
Ruof f -Wentworth Arch i tects
500 Lionshead Mall
Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: DRB Submitta'l of 2-3-82
Dear Al'l en:
At the February 3 meet'ing of the Design Review Board ' your
submittal for a primary/secondary residence was approved as
submitted with the following stipulation: if the majority of
planted trees die in the next 2-4 years, they should be
rep'laced. Approval was for a primary,/secondary residence with
a total GRFA of 4553 sq.ft.: 3762 sq.ft. primary and 791 sq.ft.
secondary.
Sin
Peter Jamar
Town
PJ:df
P'lanner
Project Appllcation
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Btocr / , p;;;1n
Com ments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:&)o/4N
Seconded by:(oO- a.z/+l)
/--x-:I APPROVAL \
-/
CI''J.,4tl
DISAPPFOVAL
+-o
I F_to Aod z249
dLA
E statt Approval
!l ti
J,
,.
Project Application 4,-
II
Project Name:
Project Description:
contact Person and "no"" h f Xl u,lF+StloaT H
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Lesar Description, tot 71 , atocx f , ,u,"n Po'T4TO P4lfA
Com ments:Alv f I
DrSc H€t4 lD tet/6.20vJ DA LdT
t-A L-ou) -
4e5
F f f Lr.\) \, Otr 7u./o
At->O A gLq /5
/.6 (L/^r\e 4t Z-3
4N t4 .2E €.
- Tpetf- Ft€4z3tz-s r+-t4T lldust: P>ES NOT FtT grr€.
aa?a.a-4tt. Design Review Board
7N4T 4PzucAPT H4s GEE{ H''CL84 t Io". //6// ?L
Motion by:
Seconded by:(oa-Loo4k)
/sA pla/za)AL-
I
Sum mary:
-t-1, olo 4 -J AJ,f
(P,ovf , n.rr4>}f N) ( Sxtovtofxt , a*ttva'; , <o+corz'<p , Prrarr)
o€(so
E statt Approval
lnwn
75 3oulh tronlage rd.
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
January 12, 1982
A11en Tafoya
Ruoff-Wentworth Archi tects
500 Lionshead Mall
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear A1 'len :
At their January
Board disapproved
on Lot 29, B'lock 1,
the application did
6, L982 meeting the Town of Vail Design Review
by a vote of 4-2 your application for a residence
RE: DRB Submittal of 1-6-82
Potato Patch Subdivision. The Board found that
not meet Section 18.54.0108 of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code -- specifically "to ensure that the location and
configuration of structures are visual'ly harmonius with their sites
and with surrounding structures and do not unnecessari'ly block scenic
views f,rsn existing building or tend to dominate the townscape or
natural Iandscape."
You have a period of ten days from the meeting date jn which to fi'l e
and appeal to the Town Council in writing.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Si ncer
Peter
Town
PJ:df
Jamar
Pl anner
i\,i'
Project Application
Projecl Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
atocx / , eitins
Design Review Board / //1 "^," /z//a/vt
/ A" 'l/
m< /rt*rn*t- / /
ftr4. ayr *t"r
Sum mary:
/o lvoT frizrr
E statt Approval
)
box 100
uail, colorado 81657
(3031 47Ss613
November 24, 1981
Allen Tafoya
Ruoff-Wentworth Archi tects
500 Lionshead Mall
Vai'l , Co]orado 81657
Peter Jamar
Town Planner
PJ:df
department of community development
RE: DRB Submitta'l of 11-18-81
Dear Al]en:
At the November 18 meetjng of the Design Review Board' your
submitta'l for a primary,/secondary residence was given preliminary
approval with the following stipulations: receive Public Works
ab'prova'| , show correct retaining wall elevations, submit roof
siinple and provide more landscaping. Approval_was a primary/secondary
residence with a total GRFA of 4553 sq.ft.: 3762 sq.ft. primary and
791 sq.ft. secondary.
Project Appllcation
Proiect Name:
Projecl Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description, ao, Cl 7 , Btocx / , pl1ing For+7tt ftz+, Zone
Comments:
Motion by://rTit,{t
seconded or, //PE(
Design Review Board Ilt
o^" /r /Ff 6 t
/t
DISAPPROVAL
{-J
Summary:
Amt
o^*, il f ftf {,
Staff Approval
\oo
Strauss R esidence
Oo
-..:--..-.,.-:,: LC.l Nl_i:]: I ri t-1..i Potato Pat-c29
512. sq. ft., 4 Floor New Du lex Residenc
T:c foTJor''1;g infori;riion is rcqu i:-eC jor sut;j::: lc:r be !:\'cr:
7l''pe cf .rj:::: i a j
b;' rhc epnlicani to the Des:gr i.-.-r^
Col or
!:;:d beiore
,"|. .Li.,l j--rl.'r
fioSi
n:_ir -- r,.- .t .t
a fir:a! a:-l:-cr.a1
t,':-;: I. I c
iiaie:ials
Fasc ia
lirn ci ow s
iii-n d ow Trin
Doors
llard o:.Deci: F,ai 1s
FJrroc
Fl asi:ing_s
C:: i:r e.','s
T:'a-cl. El;c.1 cslr:9s
Gre:nh cus es
Cther
PLr'iiiT i iA.TEt I.r.i,S
(i'eg e: e t il e, Lanisca;:r:g
E ct a,--' i c al liane
Flat Concrete lllA ran with Btack (ilW\rh
STO 8616 €rt r
R iver Rock Fireplace
Wood Olympic 908
Wood Olympic 908
Pella Clad Dark Brown
None
t,,
Metal with qlass Not known at thjs time
Wood to match Pella Windows
Steel Pipe Rails
4pt. flue to be
Pratt 6 LambertY399P Silver Mink
Calvanized sheet - painted to mafChmetal adjacent material
River Rock Warm Grey
Trash room inside 9arage
N/A
Pool deck to be pavers, retaining wails to be STO to
match house color and river rock to match fireplace.
ll^', eri al _c il:ciuc:rg Tri-es,
Cc:;:c;r l\ian e
See Landscape
an d Gl-ound Cor.er)
Plan /Site
c'- -.,'- -
uaiit i i\-
Plan
Warm Grey
llil to ,oProject Application
October 19 l98l
Project Name: Strauss Residence
Project Description: 4336 Sq. Ft. Duplex Residence
Contact Person and pnone Ruoff /V'lentworth Architects A.l.A.. P.C.
500 Lionchead l!'iall Vail- Colorado
Owner, Address and Phone: lt"il r F- It'lrs Richard StrarrsE
109 Pascack Road. Pearl River. New York 10965
Architect, Address and Phone: Ruoff /Wentwork Architects A.l.A.. P.C.
500 [ ionshrracl turall Vail . Colorado 81657 ( 303) 476-3051
Legal Description: Lot 29 , Block I , Filing potato Patch
Commenls: dential
two far,rily
, zone U.i!u4-sccondary resi-
Rgquest Preliminary Review
Design Review Board
- t ,I
D^1" ///#f/
I'l
Motion by:
Seconded Dy:
FLf /rtTt
oo fo
t
I
t
Lot Arca &3
llear -Rcqui rcC l5' proposecl
I'latercculsc-requirccl N/"'proposed
GRFA:
. GRFA:
A] 'loued
. zot{[ ctllrtK
forsfl, R, n P/s zoiir DrsTnrcTs
& 756 Prin'r),
- /g 36, Secorrc;ary
Legal Description: totoftatorx ,l-
otnt 671?fuSS nrchi.,.:cct
Zone Distri rt 4y'k -p.oporoa L,I
Lot Arca __d_5/^lrZEJleisht Al'tou...cl igi proposed S.
setbacks: Front-Reqriiiba zor'--pro'pbseo C2WA/ ro tr€arrlr-
Sides-Requircd .l5, proposed _ Z6-,
.Primary A1lor.red
Secondarl, ir'l'l or'ied
Si te Ccvcra ge : A'l 'l oi.re cl
Pro pos e C
Pro i;cs cd
Propcs e d
3 7ez--77-F
.:.a<
Landscaping:
rant'lns: .
Requit'ed
Requi red
Drive: S3"ope I>cy.rnittecl %Slope
Envjronniental/llazar.ds: .Avi.lanche
Flood Plain
Conncnts i !'
t;
Ii
i'lin9
Proposed
M-oK
-Proposed d {n P
Proposcrl €^
Propl;: r:d
Actual
. 'Siope
7o:r i r:lr1 l).il r.:
oo
T RANSMITTAL
ro 6lr-r- ANo(4...:S
R uof !?t?e 11 [vL'c i' l[.r
Arch ite cts *: :*{i'ir A f A
We Are Sending:
For Your:
The Following:
Herewith S
lnformotion fi)
Prints $o
Shop Drowings
Requisitions (
Letters
()
)
RECORD
//DATE lt /3//81
JoB No. SoSl
JOB TITLT STRAUSS RESIP€IVCE-
Under Seporote Cover ( )
Use () Action ()
( .) Specs ( ) Cuts
Photogrophs ( ) Photostots
()
()
COPIES )-DESCRIPTION -S ITL Pl r.st REMARKS
AIA
Tronsmitto
ARCHITECTS,
o \t
ENGINEERING CHEEK LIST
Subdivision
Lot
Bl ock
Fi'ling
1. Submittal Items
(A) Topo MaP
(s) site Ptan
(c) utility Plan
(D) T'itl e Report(fi SuUO:uision Agreement (jf applicable)
2. Enqineerinq Requirements
.A
(A) culvert Sjze(si o.: verr'ay GradFlET-max)-
3. Source of Utilities
(Acceptabl e)(tlot Acceptaut e)
n)ot Jl/as 7..t
tr
(A
(B
(c
(D
(r
(F
El ectri c
Gas
Ser+er
l,la te r
Tel eplrcne
T. V.
t't-'
4. Corrunetrts :
Approved: iz-frs/e/
D'i sapproved:
*HW
Bill Andrc:':s
r
r ' | '/'; \ ).1 -'1r:-ej*:
232- e"cr3t
.Joab--r.
1,4" ^ 4" /" 711,.2 Srecz'
i 13 {z 62./re
//rl --'r/Hz- (J
uTlLllY LOCAI'ION VIjl(Il:lc^Tlp 6eNwaw1w
SUI}DIVISION Potato Patch
JOB NAME Strauss Residence
29 FILINC Vail Potato P"t.h
ADDRESS
The locatjon of utilities, whether they
lines, nust be approved and verified by
accompanf ing site Plan.
Uountain Bell
Westem Slope Gas
Public Service ConPanY
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
Vail Cable T.V.
Upper Eagle Valley Water
and Sanitation District
Vail, Colorado 81657
be nain trunk lincs or ProPosed
the following utilities for the
Date
/z -za'8/
0
3TE: T'hese verifications do not reiieve the contractor of his
responsibitity to obtain a street cut Permit fron the
Town of Vail, Departnent of Public lVorl"s and to obtain
utility locations before digging in any public right-
of-way c,r easernent in the Towr of Vail.
n'O',i ii 014 ti I I * U, *.r O
tit:HF:t)Ut-.fi A
Apgr't i c: *t i crn No , V0tlli,$31/:
For Irtl:ct"trr+t i r:n 0rr l.g
'- tlh arge s ".
0wner f:'i: I i r:: g
" l'0IAl.. '" -
hlith qnui'r'xrtrritt*trce please r*{sn to Vtl0{J331d"
i. It'l'*cdiv* Datei 0C1'0P.E.ii {]&, 19[]1 at {l;0{l A,f'l .
:.:. l;'crl icrJ to he issued, arrd ;rrnp$s*d Insnredi
"i:ll.Tfit' 6urn,*l'.':; l:'6l icr,; l'll,l)
Fcrrrr B- 1?7tl (Alrended 10- 17- 7tl)
Fr^cpcs*d Insured I
T0 *Ii [rETEftfl].NED
:5 " Th* estate ar i nterest i rr the l and descr ibed nr re{'erned tc} in th i s
l.lgrnar i Lrn*n{ ancl c over*d h,ere i i,r i s:
A f:I:[:
4. 'f itl* t,o ihe egtate or int.*r^*s{:. cov*r''ed lrer'* in is al, the *irf ectiv*
dai,e h*r'*af uest,erl in:
ttlf:HfiRD [. $TFAU$!i *nd L:Aft0l-INE [." $'IflAU$$
i..] . 1h* lsncl r*ferr*d to in this {jorrirrr itrotrnt is d*!ir:: rihed as followsl
l-0T :r9 BL0cl{ I, vAlL./PoTAT0 PATCH, ACcoF{tJIN$ 10 1}iE fiECoRDED F',LAr
1'lJLft{:0}', {)0lJNlY ot-' li"A6l,..E: 7 $IAIL: 0F C0l-0tlAD0.
o',f ; c $ r,r r I r ri r N r O
{Ir:ll{":t}ur.F l}- L
( fi*qu i ren*rrtsi, ) A;,p l i c at, i on itlo, UfiOtl331,6
Th* f s11r:N ing *r* Lhe r*,:iu ir*rn*nts tc he r:orrr;:1 i*d w it,h;l, f:'agtrt*nt 'Lu ct^ far ihe account af the qr^antclns rrr rrr c r- t,,; a 91o r s of the
'Fu11 c ons i cjEr;rt i r:n '[ar the *state or int*r'*st, tr: he insurrerJ,
l, [:'r'crp,gy' instruil*nl{:;) c; r*eting the *statre ur intere:;t tc be insur*d
trti.tst he ex*cut*iJ and dt.tLg fi1*d for record, to-'r^r it:
3. UriFiriANTY DF-HD Ffl0fl FfICHARD F". fiTrrAU$ti and CAf{0t,. 1il[. f:, $rRAU$$ I0 10
FL: Dl-:Th.llllINED [0NU[:YINti $IJBJ{:UT Ftt0PERl'Y.
ilO'IH: TIII$ F.BOPIIiTY I'IAY ItE SUBJHCT'IO lIIE IIHAL L,$TA'TT lTIANSF'IR'TAX
Il,7 VIRTlJ[ 0l'INI]LtJSI0N IN l'HE T0tdN 0rr VAIL. $'L.EAUE {l0NlACf THH l'Ot'lN
0i: vAIL. t.0tr .iArIi A$$E$$nENT.
A'ra; fio**rlrruNTO
t:,'IHIDULE Ll-;l
{Exceptiorrs) Ap'pl icat.iorr Na. V00U3316
The pal icg t:r po1 ic i,rs to b* isst,t*d r,r i 11, cnntil in *xc*pt ions to th*followinq unless the sene ere dispo*ed of to th* satisfaction of the
{Jt:trtpeng:
1, Fitanr.'iard lixcep't ions I through 5 6rr inted crn the r: over sheet.
6. Tareg and ass*rssrrr*ntg nat g*t, rJu* nn p,argahl e *nd sp*r:ial assess,$ents
not g*t, cerf i.Fi*cl t,o the TneasuFer.'s of f icei.
7 . Ang unpa id ta;.les cr assessre ent s aga i nst Ee i ct I errd "
fl . l-iens for unpaid uat*n anrl se pr charges, if arrg"
9. RIGHl'!3 OF t.'AY f:OR DITCHE$ OR f,ANAI".$ CONTiTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORIl'Y OI:
Tt{H UNI TTD $TATI $, A$ f{HSjF-IrVt.0 I N UNI TED SjI ATES F'ATEN'r RECoRDED
AUrilJ$T 15, 19J5, rN B00K 93 AT FA$L: :17{t"
10. l{[riTr{]c'tI0Ngi, t,,|t{IcH tt0 N0T fl0NTAIN A F0[rFIITURE 0R frHUtit{'ILn ct-AUsiH,
auT 0f,lITTIN$ ttH$TltIcTI0N|], Ir ANy, p.AliID 0N r{AC[, t:0t.0R, R[:L.ISI0N 0R
NATI0NAt- 0RItiIN, A$ C0t'tTAINE0 IN IN$Tf(Ufir.NT frIC0fi0Ir0 fiAltC].1 05, t9/4
IN B00H ?.1.J AT PAGI 6tB AND AIIEHDED IN IN:!TRIJf'IENT REI0FDED srlPTEtlB[:R74, t?75 IN !r00K ?41 AT FAGE t5tl.
TT" UTII-. ITY C.A5E.f{EN'T I1{] TFHT IN IdIDTH ALONU T}IE 5OU1'HEI?L.Y LOI'LINE OF'
SUII,IECT F'ftOFERTY A$ SHOI.'N ON T},lt: RECORDIiO T.I.A1' Of: UAIL/T,OTATO T,ATCH.
| | rFgn'tL{dOL't-[.t
TRANSMITTAL RECORD
TO Town of Vail - Design Review Board DATE October 19, 1981
75 S. Frontage Road JOB NO.#8031
Vail, Colorado 81657 JOB TITLE Strauss Haus
Attn: Peter Jamar
We Are Sending:
For Your:
The Following:
Herewith (X)
lnformotion ( )
Prints (X )
Shop Drowings
Requisitions (
Under Seporote Cover
Use ( ) Action
Letiers () Specs()
() Phoiosrophs()
)
(
(x
)
)
Cuts ()
( .)
COPIES . DESCRIPTION
Photostots
REMARKS
2 copies
2n
Application
List of Materials
2tl Zoning check
2n
2n
Soils Report
Site Plan
4tt Floor Plans
4 I' SectionsI copie Topographic Survey
Alle
RVOFF/ WE HAR OS,AIA
()Copies of
\
Above
To:Tronsmittol Only (
RUOFEAENTWORTH ARCHITECTS, AIA
ZON ING CHECK
Strauss Residence
#8031
Lot 29, Block 1, Potato Patch Subdivision
'| 8.13.020 Zone: Two Family, Primary/Secondary
Residential District
18.13.030
r 8. 13.040
r 8. 13. 050
Conditional Uses: NiA
Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 23,422 sq. ft.
F ron ta ge 30 feet 147.22 feet
80 feet square easily enclosed
Accessory Uses:
Lot Area 6 Site
Dimensions:
Setbacks:
Front
East Side
West Side
Rear
Height:
Private swimming pool, Patios
Minium Actual
Required Ptolo*q__-f6.- ----20--
(see special requirements 18.69.050 L)
18. 13. 060
18.13.075
18. 13. 080
18. 13. 090
18.13.110
18. 13. r 20
l5l
l5l
l5t
171
l6l
gg'
Allowed Propoqed
--- 3T 321
Density Control : (see special requirements 18.69.050 J)
Site Coverage: (see special requirements l'8.69.050 E)
Landscaped Area: Minium Proposed
1a, oss. 2- sq. ft. TE,
-zzo
sq . tt.
Parking:Required Proposed
4 spaces 4 spaces
( 2 enclosed)
18.69.050 Special Restrictions for Sites in Excess of 40? Slope
18.69.050 A. Soils t Foundations Chen 6 Associates
lnvestigationr 5080 Road 154
Job #16,455 Clenwood Spring, Colorado 81601
(copy enclosed)
19.69.050 B. Foundation Design: Richard Weingardt Consult, Inc.- 1575 Sherman Street - 3rd floor
Denver, Colorado 80203
( 303) 839-s722
ta
ZONE CHECK CONIT
Strauss Residence
#8031
'18.69.050 C- Topographical Survey: Richards Engineering
18-69-050 L. Front Setback:Required Proposed
As set by DRB 20'
None required on garages
Job #V8-224 P.O. Box C-100
(copy enclosed) Avon, Colorado 81620
(303) 949-s072
18.69.050 D. Building Design: Ruoff/wentworth Architects AlA, PC
500 Lionshead Mall
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476030s1
18.69.050 E. Site Coverage: Allowed ProposedStructure 3,sT3-E-. ft. TJio s+ rt.
Parking 2,342.2 sq. ft. 342 sq. ft'
18.69.050 F. Grading 6 Drainage: Ruoff,/wentworth Architects AlA, PC
18.69.050 G. Cut 6 Fill Plan: Ruoff/Wentworth Architects AIA' PC
18.69.050 H. Revegetation Plan: RuoffiWentworth Architects AlA, PC
18.69.0s0 l. N/A
18.69. 050 J . DensitY :Allowed Proposed
rbtal cnrR 4,sgZ-E. ft. E;336:3Fsq. ft.
Max. Secondary 1,530.73 sq. ft. 679.64 sq. ft.
-18-69.050 K. Parking Enclosed: Required Propgsed
22
o
ch en and associates, inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
96 S. ZUNI . DENVER, COLOBADO 80223
1924 EAST FIRST STREET ' CASPER' WYOMIHG
301[ s rouxDAT|oX
tlrGlxIInlxG
Uheeler 6 P iper,
oo82 East Beaver
P. 0. Box F-100
Avon, Co I orado
Subj ect
!?601
, 1978
303/ 7a4-7 t 05
307 | 23.-2126
July 3l
ieaslbi llty StudY for a
Prooosed Res idence and
Genera I Subsol I Cond lt lons ,
Lot 29, Block I ' Potato
Patch Subd iv I s ion, Va I | ,
Eagle CountY, Colorado.
Job No. 16,\55
Arch ltecrs
Creek Bou levard
8t620
At t ent I on :Hr. Duane Piper
Dear Ouane:
0n June 5, 1978, we vlsired the slte to determlne access for a
backhoe whtch would be utillzed to excavate test plts for a soll and
foundatlon tnvestls"ii"i. Because of the very stecP_slopes (approxl-
;;;i;'4; p"i"""it-on rhe stte, lt would be very dtfftcutr to eain
access to the proposed rcsldential area wlth a track-npunted backhoe'
Such access tay involve rough earthuorl" on the lower porglon of the
s I te.
0n July 28, 1973, the undersigned performed a-surflcial reconnai ssance
of the slte to determlne if construct ion ls feasible with resPect to
slope stabllity and to obtain a general idea of the subsoi I conditions.
The reconna t ssance conslsted of observlng the condition of the existing
s lope, and nearby sol I cxposurcs; performlng a sei smlc 3urvey cons lst lng
of tr*o selsmlc I Ines, s hor*n on Fi9' l; and ievlewlng the results of a
soll and foundat ion investlgatlon which we.prevlously performed on the
'| ot lnmedlately south of th! subject sl te (Lot 13) '
Site Conditlons: The slte is presently vacant and located on a verY steep---------south-ractng stoPe near the upper and northern edge of the Potato Patch
Subdlvlslon. veget.at lon consists of dense growths oi sagebrush' grass'
;..;, "id " u".y-furr-"rp"n ir."r. A few scittered boulders up to 2 feet
in d lameter are partlally exposed on the ground surface' The slope
aDDears to be In a stable condition, displaylng no slgns of wet or
humr,ocky g round.
granular s lopewash solls conslstlng of cl.ayey.:"nd tl3 ?t:Itl wlth some
cobblcs and boulders. The seismic surveyi' tnatcate that the densities
oi ttrese deposlt3 are verf erratic' The upper, less dense materla'l ls
g"n"."lly on the order of'8 feet thick, but ls appreclably deeper ln
some places. This less dense materlal may conslst. predomlnantly of
;i;;.; sand whl lc the underlylng, more dense materlal probably contalns
larger arnounts of cobbl es and boulders'
The test pit excavated for the soll and foundatlon lnvestlgatlon at
Lot 33, to the sourh of the subject slte, encountered very hard sandstone
bedrock at a depth of about ll ?eet below the ground surface' The
,.irri" survey ior Lot 29 dld not reveal that competent sandstone bedrock
;;;-;linfi no.""t foundarlon depths at thls slte. However, lf the
s"ndstorr. bedrock is extremely iolnted, the sheQr wave velocitY through
tho bedrock would be t"i.tiu"i'-slow and ln the range of that for solls'
Therefore, it i, " porribillty'lhat bedrock may be encountered at foun-
datlon grades but probably would not requlre blasting'
Whcclor t Pl Por ' Archltects
July 3l , 1978
Page 2
Proooscd Conslructlon: Wc understand that ghe proposed resldence ls to
ffirety downs lope of rhe existlng roadway. The
iorna"tlon will be srepped downs lope and it is anticlpated that cuts
into the slope wlll be'on the order of B feet deep or less. The resi-
dence wl ll be of wood frame construct lon and convent ional resldential
typeloadsareexpected.ltisalsoplannedloggls!ructaswIr'rrnlng
pool adjacent to the residence.
Founda! i on wal I
other ret e in Ing
pressure wh ich
ar least 4$ pcf
General Subsoil Conditions: Based on nearby exposures ' the subsolls In
ffisldence orobably conslst of predomlnantly
pi.i itrnary des lgn of'tf,e proposed rcs ldence' The foundat lon
should be insp.ct.d irlor to constructlon ln order to observe
subsoll and bedrock condltions and final lze foundatlon dcsign
The general design Parameters arc as fol lows:
(l) The resldencc mey be founded wlth spread footlngs placcd on the.
naturalso|lsorbedrock.Spreadfootlngsshouldbedeslgnedfora
naxlmum soit uu"rin! p'.,.ut" on the ordir of l'000 to 4'000 psf'
The f Inal maximum soll bearlng pressure may be determined from an
inspec!ion of the foundat ion excavat ion' The lower Pressures
should be ut il lzed lf appreclable anrounts of porous clays err e
present In the subsoi I s '
s on the ucslope Portlons of the forrndation and
r.ralls should be designed to reslst lateral earth
should be based on an equivalent fluid prcssure-of
. Foundat ion and reEainlng wal ls should be welI
construct lon Reconrnenda t i ons : Based on the observations nade durlng,our
iiiffiour experience In the area, we recommend
that the fol Iowing dellgn and constructlon parameters be utll lzed for
excava t i on
the
crlteria.
o
Vheclor c Plier, Archltects
Jufy 3t , 1978
Page 3
drained to prcvent the bulldup of hydrostat lc pressure in back of
the walts. Excavatlons In!o the natural solls should be kept as
shallow as pos3ible and should be llmited ln length to mlnlmlze
disturbance to the steep slopes. Temporary cu! slopes should be
stabIe ?t InctinatIons of up to l:1, but w| || sIough when exposed
to weathering.
(3) The swinrming pool and thc lower floor levels should be prot'ected
with underdralns.
(4) lf flll ls regul rod benearh floor slabs, lt should conslst of a
nonexpans ive, granular soll. Tha flll should be compacted to at
least 95? standard Proctor denslty at optlmum molsturc content-and
should not contaln cobblcs greater than 5 Inches In dlaneter.
Vegetat lon ghould be stripped and rclatlve'ly level bcnches cut into
steep slopes prior to flll placement. A A-inch layer of free
dratnlng gravel shduld be provlded beneath the floor slabs and
bencath the swimrnlng pool. These I ayers ghould connect to the
underdra i n g rave I
(5) lr ls extrernely important that good surface drainage be provided
around the restdence to prevent surfage water from Infl ltratlng
into backflll soils. Landscaplng which requlres large arnounts of
lrrlgation should be discouraged for thlg lot. The introductlon of
more than naEural anounts of molsture lnto the subsoils may reduce
s lope st€bi litY.
lf there are any questlons, or if we can be of further service'
olease let us know.
Slncerely,
CHEN AND ASSOC IATES , INC.
flJ P/med
Rev. By: R.
Enclosure
By
6v.:1.3i{.0(;iua'"""{?l
fter$
'2,42<,4
| ,t tlr'
(
I
tl
.it
il
l- |
t.1
'iu
f
ll
I
Scale:
ltr-20 l
-
&,r'o
Prcbable Area .-or Housc -t''
/