The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB120500�� . �;cMidM�w�u��pr� �u��r��.a�a'r IC��ii�ir� Il��i�� '1�'��'� �M �1 �'� 1�1�1 IC��p�u�tqm�r��t �� mmmmu�irriit� IC��Ic�pmm�ir�t 7'S '�c��u�h Fu��n�t��a�� c��i, �'�iil� ��Il��rr��l� '�16�7' t�dl: �7'�.47�.21�� : '��!�.4�'�.��452 ��r; �r^��.�r�iil�c��r,��r�� Project Name: WALWER WINDOW/DOOR REPLACEMEN Project Description: Participants: DRB Number: DRB120500 Replacement of several windows and sliding doors in the east unit. The replacement windows and doors are tan to match the existing color. The west side of the duplex currently has white vinyl windows. OWNER WALLNER FAMILY LP 2614 LIGHTHOUSE BEND DR PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082 APPLICANT WALWER FAMILY LP 2614 LIGHTHOUSE BEND DR PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082 10/09/2012 10/09/2012 Project Address: 1141 CASOLAR DEL NORTE DR VAIL Legal Description: Lot: A-7 Block: 1 Subdivision: CASOLAR VAIL Parcel Number: 2103-014-1400-2 Comments: See conditions Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: Location: UNIT A BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPP Date of Approval: 10/25/2012 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond:201 (PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3: APPEALS. Cond:202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0012893 The applicant shall paint all the white doors, windows, and trim in the west half of the duplex tan to match the tan color currently exisiting in the east half by no later than June 30, 2013. The windows shall be painted prior to requesting a final planning inspection on the east unit windows. Cond: CON0012894 The applicant shall place trim around all the new windows and doors which matches the existing trim on the structure with regard to dimension, color, and architectural character prior to requesting a final planning inpsection. Planner: Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 w�-,� ��%�'� �� %1�� °: � � � V � OCT 0 5 20i2 1��y5Arh `� TOWIV �F VAIL Department of Community Develqpment 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator Appiication for Design Review Minor Exterior Alteration General Information: This application is required for all proposals involving minor changes to buildings and site improve- ments, such as roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences, retaining walls, etc. Applicable Vail Town Code sections can be found at www.vailqov.com under Vail Information — Town Code Online. All projects requiring de- sign review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, as outlined in the submittal requirements. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building per- mit is issued and construction commences. Fee: $25 r Multi-Family/Commercial 0 for Single Fami /Duplex �_ Single Family � Duplex �� _ Multi-Family ❑ Commercial Description of the Request: t�fle-�(i#�. �j►�tipdt,�� pr�p '�i�ccx.,�+ os,,� �f��1c�,,�uj� Physical Address: i I/-Ff k C�spi.A2 O'E�. Nb�rC� Parcel Number: 'ot10�—Of 4-1 �5-- t�0a (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: _ �,AC�t ,� �.fl►�,� L,3-A►�t�1�i2 Mailing Address: __ _ a.61 �1�- �1CTV1Tqi�S� �t� Oiz. �G�t'C�- ��D�} gE�lcyt , �L , ��%C�� Phone: Owner's Signature:�. �;S.c��.+�'�iZi��1, Primary ContacU Owner Representative: ��y p��?'�� Mailing Address: � �j� �� 1/'i41L , CO, 816�� Phone: ��—'�°��- 'L,'�Gi2� E-Mail: �q�2J� C�A�1 MHcl.�o (Yl Fax: I��A For Office Use Only: Cash CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Fee Paid: Exp. Date Received From: Auth # Check # Meeting Date: DRB No.: _ ��[a, ��j �� Planner: Project No: Q� ��— � l.p 3� Zoning: Land Use: Location of the ProposaL• Lot: ' Block:�_ Subdivision: �l D��S �t �G► C� �� ri1C � ■ THE LAW OFFICE OF MARY MCWILLIAMS, P.C. September 20, 2012 Re: yVindow Replacement at 1141 A Casolar Del Norte, Vai1, CU To Whom It May Concern:: Please be advised that th_ ^:�*�._�'_-:-- �� ,?n,n r°._�,-_. ,,,, �T-. - ��-__.._ ,,,,�.,....,�,_ Y --r - has no objection to and supports the window re�;la�ci��Gt�� Uy �11G 11U111GV W 1IG1 J� `Jiil:l� iilt(1 JQllG Wallner in Unit A. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 303-655-8225. Thank you. �incereiy, • � '�'�o�'M'�.'�IVI. Mary B. McWilliams �, .. PO BOX 374 • BRIGHTQN, CO • 80601 PHONE: 303-655-8225 • FAX: 303-655-8244 • EMAIL: MARY_MCWILLIAMS@MCWILLIAMSLAW.COM STATF, i.i(:F,NSF.S: COi,ORADO • NF.UC� YORK • NFW )ftRSF.Y David Rhoades From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear David, Nancy Bigsby <nbigsby1006@yahoo.com> Monday, October 08, 2012 7:17 AM David Rhoades Jack & Jane Waliner Wallner windows and sliders As the President of the Casolar HOA I am approving the replacement of windows and doors at the Wallner property located at 1141 A Casolar Dr. The Board of the association has also voted to approve these replacements. Nancy Bigsby, President, Casolar HOA. 10/8/2012 Sierra Pacific Windows �-` � A Division of Sieira Pac�c lndustries ��r=; ,J �-�` 1121 Singletree Road, Box 2040 Edwards, Colorado 81632-2040 s�f� P�,,;� 970-926-3715(Phone) � 970-926-3745(Fax) March 20, 2012 So/d To: KELLY TOOM BOX 995 MINTURN, CO 81645 (970)390-5732-Work KELLY TOOM Aw,J..r /'�L��L l t�� Species Quanfity Operation Rough Opening Glazing/Lites w ..�..�.. ,_�.�.-"-- ------• -� -°--..._...... Limlted Warranty (Applies to these line item numbers) No Warranty (Appi�s ta ihese line ftem numbers) CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE COPY '��0 3l30/2012 Order Number 80303840 Page 1 of 6 Tertrn : Caah on Delivsry Requlred Deposit : 55,500.00 PO#: Job # : Permit No i : Box Screens : No Box Har+dvrare : Yes Ship To: RESIDENCE CASOlAR DRIVE VAIL, CO 81657 {970)390-5732-Cell KELLY TOOM Jamb Size Primed vs Clear Exterior Trim Hardware Screens Direct Ship: No Subdiviaion : 7ract Number. Property locatton: CASOIAR DRIVE VRIL, CO 81657 Property Owner. JANE WALLlVER CASOLAR DRiVE VAIL, CO 81657 Drawing Page(s) O/S Purchase lead time O/S Purchase warranty VWI Compfiant Terms and Conditions Lender. Owners ManuaVSPW WaRanty Color (Ciad) 003 Sandstone Installation instructions No Shop Drawings Required (Exterior} (Interior) Distressed Colonial Contemporary (This oMer is subject to the terms and conditions printed on the badc page. Please read them before signing.) Customer Stgnature Sales Rep Signature Butts � Order Summary Net Total 4.40 Tax Rate Labor Charge Order Totai $ 11,939.25 $ 525.33 $ 0.00 S 12,464.58 ! Order Number 90303840 Page 2 of 6 initials: ' --- r -r ._ _ _ - - --- ----- ----- _- __ T � --- �I--��nchesl �ht i-De -��-- -- I Opifons i �tem I I Extallor f.tam ! AddWonai i � i Rou h O enin �- � ��- Hardware I Size I � ti �� GDG2�2 � C� 27 3/4 x 62 3/4 O O r I SYm LIVING ROOM Insulated 1 Lite I----- � Trim �linches) aPtions I --- - - � -��--t- �--- --- _ __ _ I No Hardware iVo Bnekmould I 6 11/16' �, Clad: 3 i � Dired Glaze � � � TemPe�� No Screen No S�II Nose � � Sandstone � Vent Tubes � ; p�e � U-iac: 0.26 SHGC: 0.23 i LoE'-366 Cfex IM. i Vt: 0.52 CR: 39.00 LoE-i81 Cntmp Profile 1 GDG2762-1 27 3/4 x 62 3/4 O LIVING ROOM Msulat�l 1 l'tte No Herdwaro No Bridcmould 6 11H6" Cled: 3 I i Di�ect Glaze Tempeted No Screen No Sill Nose Sandatane U-fac: 0.26 SHGC: G.23 �;T� 8 � Pine � Vt: 0.52 CR: 39.00 �81 � Clear Int. � CMmp Profile i 3 1 C-DG-25 1f259 1/2-1 26 t/4 x 60 1/4 O LiV1NC, ROOM �insulated 1 t�te No Hardrvare No 8rickrraWd 6 11/16" Cled: 3 I Dired Glaze Ve�t Tubea I No Screen No Sill Nose Sandsto�e LoE'366 p� U-fac:0.26 SHCiC:0.23 Vt: 0.52 CR: 39.00 L 81� I CMtnp) Profib 1 GDG1839-1 48 3!4 x 38 3!4 O KITCHEN I�atd�ed 1 Life No Hardwaro No Brickmould 8 11/16" Ciad: 3 D'ued G1aze Vent Tubes i No Screen No SiN Nose Sarulstone + LoE'-366 Pine U-fac: 0.26 SHGC: 0.23 7emp (nt Cber IM. Vt: 0.52 CR: 39.00 LoE-i61 Cntmp Profile 5 1 C-AC-27 1/238 1/2-2 55 3!4 z 39 1!4 LR BEDROOM Insulated 1{.ite Bronze No Bcickmoutd . 6 11/16" Cled: 3 Aspen Casemer�t VerN Tubes - HaMwaro No Sill Nose Sand�or�e LoE'-366 Bronze p� !1-fac: 0.30 SHGC: 0.17 Temp Int - Sexce� Designer Sash Vt: 0.38 CR: 43.00 LoE-i81 Egress Hdw I Clear int. CMmp Profik � i 1 C-AC-24 1/298-i 25 1/4 x 39 314 l BATH instAated 1 Lite Bronze Np BrickmouW � 6 11H6" Cfad: 3 Aspen CasemeM VerN Tubea I- Herdware No Sip Nose Sandstorro U-fac:0.30 SHGC:0.17 �'-� Bronze Pine Temp Irt - �� g�r � Vt: 0.39 CR: 43.00 LoE-i81 I Ck.ar int. CMmp Ptofile 1 GAG2447 112-1 48 1/4 z 48 4/4 L BEDROOM Insulated 1 Lite Bronze ' No Brickmould 6 11116" Cled: 3 Aspen CasemeM � Vent Tubes - HaMware No Sip Noae Sandstone LoE'-368 Bronze p�� MuNed Unit ner SaRh Frst ilem in unit 1.�-i81 t Egre Hdw I CDlea�r Int. U-fec: 0.30 SHGC: 0.17 I I Cntmp Prof�e � Vt: 0.39 CR: 43.00 1 GAG23 1/247 1/2-1 -> See item # 7 S BEDROOM �Ins�ated 1 Li}e I No Flardwer� IVp Briekmould 6 11H6" Clad: 3 Aspen Casement �Vent Tubes � No Screen I No SiB Noee Sandstone ��-�''� -> See ftem # 7 Temp tnt Designer Sash I U-tac: 0.30 SHGC: 0.17 LoE-i61 Ckar Int. Vt: 0.39 CR: 43,00 CMmp Profile 1 GAC-2439 1/2-1 24 3(4 x 40 1/4 R MASTER BATH �Inn�ateei 1 tate Brpnze No Bridcmould 6 t 1/16" � Cled: 3 IAspen Casement I I 'Tempered - Hardware No SiN Nose i Sandato�e U-fac' 0.30 SHGC: O.t7 �„�•_386 s � B�� I Pine Vt: 0.39 CR: 43.00 � LoE-i81 ' I Oesigner Sash Ciear Int. Crrtmp Profik _ ; -- - _ --- -_ _-- � ' �Y � Produet Code 1 1 GAG24391/2-1 i Aspen Casemern U-fac: 0,30 SHGC:0.17 Vt: 0.39 CR: 43.00 11 1 GSD-68 SN676 3/42 Shasta Door Drawing Ra�uired IU-fac: 0.30 5HGC: 0.16 Vt: 0.34 CR: 44.00 1 C-SD-68 5/1676 3/42 Shasta Door Drawing Required U-fac:0.30 SF�C:0.18 Vt: 0.34 CR: 44.00 1 C-SD-66 5/167fi 3J42 Sha6ta Door Orawing Required U-fac: 0.30 SHGC:0.16 Vt: 0.34 CR: 44.00 1 GSD-66 5/16i6 3142 Shasta Door Drawing Required U-fac:0.30 &HGC: 0.16 Vt: 0.34 CR: 44.00 1 � OS Screens(6) 1 Boxed V�indow Hardware-HOLD 1 Cusrom Lxk & S6de _-- pe � I O � , — _---- Rough Opening . Width x He ht Sym I tocation 1(nches) I � 24 3/4 x 40 1/4 ' L �— � AAASTER BATH 70 3/4 x 78 1/4 70 3/4 x 79 1/4 70 314 x 79 ti4 70 3!4 x 79 1/4 Ordt� Number 90303840 Page 3 of fi Initiais: lite or�� ---- r------ � — r'�� Griile i Hardware , Exterior S�Q . AddiUonal � ��^S ' Pattern ----- - Trim (�nchesl OPt�°^s ' I - -- � ---__ — } — - - ;--------� - ---+ _ _ _ 1 �--- �ed ; 1 Lile ! Bronze � No BrickmoWd ' 6 11/t&" Clad: 3 ' i Tubea - Ha�dware No Sip Nose ! � Sandstone I •368 � Bronze Pine � IM I- Screen Dasigner Sash KITCHEN Iraulstad Tempered Verrt Tubes LoE'-366 � LoE-i81 ', �Head: 4 5/8 S51e: 4 5/8 Kidc: 6 13/16 LIVING lruulated Tempered Vetn Tubes ILoE'-366 LoE-i81 'Head: 4 5!B Stik: 4 5/8 Kick: 6 13/16 BEOROOM Ilnsulated Tempered Vem Tubes LOE'-366 LoE-i81 Head: 4 5/8 Siile: 4 5/8 Kick: 6 13H 6 BEDROOIuf I�ulated Tempered Ver�t Tubes LoE? 366 LoE-i81 �Mead: 4 5/8 Stile: 4 5/8 Kicic: 813t46 I Gear int. I Cntmp Profiie 1 Lke MunchenJ374 No Brickmould 6 11/16" C�lad: 3 I Satin Nickel �� -Trim Set Doug Fir US15 �� , _ ��s I Sandstone � Ext:- Screen 156Q Stxeen i Beige - Qlon 1 Lke Mu�N374 No 8rickmoutd 6 11/76" Ciad: 3 I ISatin Nickei Sandstone �Trim Set Doug Fir US15 Ckar Irrt. Sen�dstone ( I Ext:- Screen I 1580 Screen Brown - Qbn � ---�---- � 1 Lite � Mu�chenf374 � No Brickmould I 6 11H6" Chd: 9 I Satin Nickel � Sandstone i- Trim Set � Doug Fir � �15 Clear lrrt. i-Hinges I Sandstone E�d�- Screen 1580 Saeen � Brown - qbn 1 Lite Munchenl374 No Brickmoutd 6 11l16" C{ad: 3 Satin Nickei ��e - Trim Set po� FR US15 Clear Irrt. _ Hi�yes � I Sendstone I Ext:- Screen , �BSraam �ion I w � � --"'- Order Number 90303840 Pas�e 4 of 6 IMtials: .-...... a..varv. r•cl � -- ---- Glaze dptions Hardware Options Insulated - Insulated Giass SIM DL - Simulated Divided trte TSL - Tandem Sash Lock Swing Screen - Swing Door Screen SDL - Singk Divided Lite Lami 1 Side - Lamimate 1 Side FOL - Foot Operated Lock Liie Finish - Lfietime Fnish IDL - ins�►ated Divided Lite FCH - Falding Crank Handle Warranty /nformation Exterfor Trim SNFB = Stucco Brickmould ESN 2= 6ctended Siq Nose 2" ESN 3= F�ctended Sili Nose 3" Additional Options ESH = E�Aended Sifl Hom Primed IM. - Primed IMerior Ciear Int. - Clear Irterior Primed Ext. - Primed Exterior Ctear Ext. - Clear Exterior LtAA1TED WARRANTY: Sierca Pacific Windows wanants certain components oNy as more speaficaNy desaibed in the written limited Warcanty and disdaims any other express or implied warcaMy, includng, without limitation, any impiied warranty ot merchantabibty or fitness fw a paAicular purpose. The prariuct is r� cartfied for air inRltration, water penetration, structur� loading, forced er�try or harclwere bad testing. Damages are Nrtdted by the terms oi the Lirtut� Warranty. Custorr�r is advised to carefuMy review the Limited Warranty for the speafic provi�ions applicable to the products purchased. NO WARRANTY: Sierca Paafic Windows warrants only that the product has been manufaqured in accordance with the specificaRions contairrcd in the order. Sierra Pacific Windows diu�ma any other express or implied warrantyr, induding, without limitation, any warrarrty oi merchantayiiity or fitness tor a particular purpose. ^:--'— Outside Purchase Items: Werranty covered by product manufadurers speafic warrarHy. Sedonas with jambs greater than 49/16: Limited screen opening Radius Sedonas: tirtrted sash opening t. TERMS: a. NI C.O.D, oMers are M 6e paid in full to the delivery driver with either a Cashiers Chedc or a personal check, prepriMed with the Bu�/a's �ame and address, prior to unloa�ing the order. Or orders where wuchers are pre.appr�ved, they must be presented to the driver prior to uNo�ing the order. b. This quoted price indudes a 3% discount for nt made ' h 2. RIGHT TO UEN: 3. ATTORNEY FEES: 4. ESTfMATE OR BIDS: 5. ORDERS: payme in cas , chack, or other means not mvolwng the use of a erecYit card. This discauM �a offered to ap prospective buyers. Payment by Credii Card wilt weive this discouM. a No dedudions may be taicen irom the invoice amount urdess authorized by Sierra Pacific Windows prior to ddivery. Sierra Pecific Windows wiN not be responsibie for any back charpes reaulting from additional maferiais or work performed by oihers (see WarraMy Tor further information) d. Past due balances are subject to 1.5°k monthiy fmance charge. e. Arry check or other payment retumed to Sierra Pacitic as the result of ina�ciont funds or canceled paymeM wiil result irt a S50 processing fee added to the wder t�ai. a. in the event the contract amourrt is not paid in fuN, Sierta Paafic Windows rcsenres tlu rigM to place a 6en or bond which mey be asserted under any provision of Me law, to secure paymeM of the coMrad amount. a. If any fegal �tion is required, Sierra Pacific VWndows is entitled to reeover reasonaWe attomey ises, court cbsts arrc! �I other roasonable profeasiortal expert or consukant tees arM costs related to such legal adion. a. Alt pricing is good for 30 days unless specifically noted to the contrary. b. Sierra Paafic 1flfindows asaumes rro res�xinsibility for errors in take�ofls or priang. a. Upon signing, Customer agrees to aN terms and conditions of this coMrect. b, Orders are subjed to dehay due to strikes, firo, floods, accidents, or arsy other cause beyond our confrol. Siena Pacific Windows w��l not be responsible for loss or damage beyond ds contro c. Seller is rrot 6able tor prospective profits or speci� indirect, consequentiai w inciclentai dameges, nor may the recovery of any kind again�t seNer be qreafer in amourrt than the purchase pria of the speCific material sdd and causing the aqeped Mss darnage or irtjury, 6. CHANGE OROERS: a. Order changes w��l only be accepted within 3 days of sig�ing the origin� order. b. Speciai order items may only be changed or cancelled within 3 days from signing the origin� order. c. CanceNations may only be made within 3 days trom signing the original order. d. Order chenges are immediateiy binding. They do NOT �low an additional3 days for modification w cancellation. e. Sierra P�c Windows reserves the right to adjust Rrices for order changes made at the request of the buyer at any Nme fdlowing original order acceptance. f. Any change to ihe order may result in a detayed delivery date. 7. TAlLGATE DELIVERY: a. Siema Pacific Windov¢s ia not responsible for labor to u�load. Buyer must provide sufncient iabor at the job sik when driver arrives. b. Badc orders will be noted on the paperv�rork and will detiver as soon as possibk. c. Arry items missing or damaged must be noted on the drivers paperworic at the time of detivery or it wiA be assumed compkte and in good condition. d. Sierca Pacific Windowu is not responsible for goods picked up by buyer in hisiher own vehida. 8. SALES TAX: a. The S�es Tax tate in this quote is estimatnd � the time of the quote. Customer agrees to pay the actuat S�es Tax in effect at the time oi deiivery of any poAion o1 this order. .. �� . . � £ �- �, • ° _ _ ffi.. �,� . � � i�� . �� =� # ; � �,�rt � �"`, �� , � . � s � �'�, i�� . � � � � � A �-� �� fr . � �' � � ��,�,. , � �� , � � � �� ,� �� q: , ;� . . s ,� � �, , . , � � �� * t p '�" +M1* "� � k� '� � �� r � " �r . . "* - , _ �� 1. Fr '� � � #M � � e . � � � �� ; � � � . ��a� �* �.,�� ` � � . '"'+� . +� �, �' , x , , , - �� _ "� �' � i ,� ' � " ,: �. �r , � ' d � ** « „ * � ,,, � � � �1 °' � � � � � � � � � + � � � ,� � ,�� , �, k "�'� 1P, � a °�, . ,, � � � ,. � < , � ,""� . �+ . � ,� - a, �-;�� " ` • � ° * �` � � , � ; �,". � �`" ��. � �. `�� b "' � � � � � y'i. � . �� `b` � " i,.. . � .. � � `� a,..�py �s9� � � � � 54� �� z� � i �. � � � �� ' !�-` �i . � �,- '� u° �. . � �. � � � � ,� �x ^ , . � q � � � , � � �� w�,,.�� , � �. , � x� � � �. � � � . . �.: � � : ' � >;, , , , � � ;�, �� l � ' ��t �. ` ,� � � t `+�1 ��. � �a � � � !I a , ,, ,� "f`f . �x. •. � � �� . +� �.� � � � .�. . � l� � � ' f � � � ,.� .. .. � . . ��` , .a. � � �� ' � � � � �.. _ � � m. �°�„�� : � = .� � .,�,�,. �, � ::,.-+ .,� � ,. _. Y ��' �� f � `� - � 'r , A � � . '.. � � �..: ... . ar .°' . ^.''.. .. a .+.e.bv. _ . . . N= � � . , � �,.: $,.fF .: � � � . � :.� .. . , .^' h a � - -'« _„. � � a v .. ,•.w�"'' :r s'�,%+� .. � . .�K� � . � . .• . J .. '" ..�'..a„s/�,��.. .. *�. ..- ' �� ,. �, ..� � � .-...•'"'»�::. ��E-,- .. j ... � � � �:. � �`^rP - �� „' "� _+�1 . � , ,_ .� .� >. ..� �,� . _ 1 � h a . � a + # . �� Y � � _... ,.. — � �� _ _ 9 1 . �u_. � . .. 4 a'�� I��.... � � S � � _... . . �e �� !• � ..vew ':.. . , ,x,:.. i�1� . �`� � � I � . �. . x i t ' .. �:.:'�. , ,:....: � � . . . . . . . . . . .. � .� ..... �.. ... . .. , rr+' ,.... ..; . � ... . . . . . . . .. . .. . �...... �. . . . . . . . . _ " � „ ��..°y,�„�' � s. , , . , � , ; � -�` .. j , � . � .- , . � , , . . � - . y � _ . - . � _ � _ �_ �_ —_. _ _ � _ _ �._ _ _ , � .�..J.:�_� .ii�ri � � , �`'� ' `r I � F � DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE DOOR FRAME HARDWARE SIZE LOUVER DETAIL FIRE RATING NOTES MARK WD HGT THK MATL GLAZING WD HGT MATL EL HEAD JAMB SILL LABEL SET KEYSIDE NO RM NO 11 6-0 7-0 1 3 4 INSUTAT T 0 0 WD -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12 6-0 7-0 1 3 4 INSUiAT T 0 0 WD -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13 6-0 7-0 1 3 4 INSUtAT T 0 0 WD -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 6-0 7-0 1 3 4 INSULAT T 0 0 W -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Main Level � /s„ _ �' — o° � I Upper Level � /s° _ � � — o„ � � � a � � O� l' Warren Campbell From: stephen O'Brien <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:44 AM To: Warren Campbell Subject: RE: Wallner's Warren, Sounds great, that gets us into a better position. I did submit the paperwork to David. Shall I drop by later? I know you guys are busy, what works best? The windows will be painted, no issues there Warren. I have found a contact for a paint which can adhere well to PVC. The ambient air temperature for application needs to be above 65f. It also as a plasticizer that etches the vinyl for adhering and that too needs to be in a dry and warm condition. I'll have the work done before any siding work or application is requested, no problem there Warren. Thanks for your continued co-operation. It's greatly appreciated. Regards Steve 0'Brien From: WCampbellCa�vailaov.com To: kl9steveC�hotmail.com Subject: RE: Wallner's Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:23:42 +0000 S�eve, I c�n c�ndi�i�n �he del�y �f �he p�in�ing �f �he wind�ws in �he ��her uni�a ihere will be no fin�l inspec�i�ns �nd �ppr�v�ls �n �he wind�ws �n �he VV�Ilner's uni� un�il such �ime �s �he ��her side wind�ws �re p�in�eda ihe wind�ws will need �� be p�in�ed reg�rdless �f �ny move f�rw�rd �n siding w�rk nex� ye�ra I w�uld s�ill �sk �h�� we �ry �� p�in� �hem y�� his y�r �s I�hink w� will h�v� sr�m� w�rm w��h�r �f��r �his r�c�n� snc�w, ih� W�Iln�r's �r� cr�mmi��ing �hemselves �c� p�in�ing �he windc�ws in �he spring, Pl��s� pr�p�r� yr�ur building p�rmi� fc�r submi��l if i� h�s nc�� Ir�dy b��n submi��d, From: stephen 0'Brien �mailto:kl9steveC�hotmail.com1 Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:35 PM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: Wallner's Warren, Thank you for your reply. We will be doing siding work next year, much of the exterior needs considerable work. With the imminent weather change expected, holding off until next spring would be ideal. This way we can keep continuity in paint colors. So at worst case scenario, how about having work completed next door at our expense by June 30th. Thanks again for your time and understanding... Regards Steve 0'Brien Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:26 AM, °Warren Campbell° <WCampbellCa�vailaov.com> wrote: i Steve, I am prepared to sign off on the design review approval as soon as you confirm that the adjacent unit's windows and doors will be painted tan to match the Wallner's windows and doors. I need a date from you by which the windows will be painted and we can begin that before the building permit is issued. Warren Warren Campbell From: stephen O'Brien <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:35 PM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: Wallner's Warren, Thank you for your reply. We will be doing siding work next year, much of the exterior needs considerable work. With the imminent weather change expected, holding off until next spring would be ideal. This way we can keep continuity in paint colors. So at worst case scenario, how about having work completed next door at our expense by June 30th. Thanks again for your time and understanding... Regards Steve O'Brien Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:26 AM, "Warren Campbell" <WCampbell@vail�ov.com> wrote: Steve, I am prepared to sign off on the design review approval as soon as you confirm that the adjacent unit's windows and doors will be painted tan to match the Wallner's windows and doors. I need a date from you by which the windows will be painted and we can begin that before the building permit is issued. Warren Warren Campbell From: stephen O'Brien <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 7:55 AM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: On Friday Thank you Warren. I really appreciate your continued effort and correspondence... Regards Steve Sent on the Sprint° Now Network from my BlackBerry° -----Original Message----- From: Warren Campbell <WCampbell@vail�ov.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:53:23 To: <kl9steveC�hotmail.com> Subject: On Friday A Kelly stopped by and said he was a friend of yours who is a contractor. He was going to get pricing on the painting of the adjacent unit windows and get that to you. Hopefully we can get that done yet this year so I can sign-off and approve the Wallner's windows. Warren Campbell From: Warren Campbell Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:48 PM To: 'Mary McWilliams' Cr. kl9steve@hotmail.com Subject: RE: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar De) Norte � From: Mary McWilliams [mailto:Mary_McWilliams@McWilliamslaw.com] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:56 AM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte We are not planning a painting or residing project any time soon. We are not opposed to painting the windows to match the other unit but will not incur any expense to do it. So if you can fashion a solution that the partnership incurs no expense we are certainly open to the idea. Thanks Mary McWilliams Law Office of Mary McWilliams, PC PO Box 379 Brighton, CO 80601 303-655-8225 Fax: 303-655-8244 Mary McWilliams(c�McWilliamslaw.com ** This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This message and any attachments hereto may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this email from your computer. The sender does not waive any privilege in the event this message was inadvertently disseminated.** On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Warren Campbell <WCam�b�vailgov.com> wrote: i +� � �. . . � �.� � �.� �.� �.� � �.� � � lT�i .E1�"1� From: Mary McWilliams [mailto:Mary_McWilliams@McWilliamslaw.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:27 AM To: Warren Campbell Subject: RE: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte I am vvorking on this issu�. W� ar� sp�aking to th� ovvn�rs of 1141a. I b�li�v� that vv� ar� unvvilling to incur any �xp�ns� r�garding our vvindovvs sinc� vv� vv�nt through th� prop�r approvals and proc�dur�s through th� Tovvn of Vail. I vvill k��p you appris�d vvh�n I hav� a final ansvv�r. Mary McWilliams Law C�ffice of Mary McWilliams, PC PC� Box 379 Brighton, CC� 8�6�1 3�3-655-8225 Fax 3�3-655-8244 Mary McWilliams(�McWilliamslaw.com " This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This message and any attachments hereto may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this email from your computer. The sender does not waive any privilege in the event this message was inadvertently disseminated." From: Warren Campbell Imailto:WCampbellCa�vail og v.coml Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:43 AM To: 'MARY MCWILLIAMSC?MCWILLIAMSLAW.COM' Cc: kl9steve@hotmail.com Subject: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte Mary, My name is Warren Campbell and I am the Chief of Planning for the Town of Vail. I am sending this email as a follow-up to my voicemail. It sounded like you are out of the office so I thought I would send an email as you might have a device that you access when out of the office. As you are aware there is a request by the Wallners to replace their windows with tan windows to match the existing windows in their unit. The Wallners began the installation of their new windows prior to submitting an application to the Town of Vail to do so which has resulted in tan windows already having been installed. The windows were installed as the contractor believed they were a same for same replacement not needing a permit. Upon doing a site visit I discovered that Unit B currently has white windows and doors (with the exception of the two tan windows flanking the sliding door above the garage). This condition prompted me to research the Town's records to determine how the duplex structure ended up with different colored windows and doors. I discovered in 2005 (DRB050191) that a staff inember approved the white windows and noted that there was a mismatch of window colors in this structure. This staff inember at the time should have worked with you and the other half of the duplex to arrive at a solution where all the windows and doors in the structure were the same color as the Town Code contains a provision requiring architectural compatibility within a single structure (duplex). The Design Review Board has consistently required duplex structure to have matching window colors in order to have a unified architectural character. This correspondence today is an effort to resolve a condition which should not have been permitted to occur (the Town Staff accepts responsibility for this situation). I need to resolve this issue so that I can approve the Wallner's new windows. I have spoken to Stephen (the Wallner's contractor) and he has confirmed there are methods and products by which vinyl windows can be painted. This is one solution. The tan windows on the Wallner's unit could be painted white is another solution. I am seeking your input on other solutions. I do not know the lifespan of the white vinyl windows (surely more than 8 years), but if they were on your radar for replacement that might be an option as well. I am looking to work with you and the Wallners to resolve this issue in a way wear there is minimal impact to either owner, but results in matching colored windows and doors in the structure. Please let me know your thoughts so we can begin to move towards resolution. Regards, Warren Campbell Warren Campbell From: Mary McWilliams <Mary_McWilliams@McWilliamslaw.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:27 AM To: Warren Campbell Subject: RE: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar De) Norte �. �� . � � �. � � . . .� . �� . ��r�� Mary McWilliams Law C�ffice of Mary McWilliams, PC PC� Box 379 Brighton, CC� 8�6�1 3�3-655-8225 Fax 3�3-655-8244 Mary McWilliams�McWilliamslaw.com " This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This message and any attachments hereto may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this email from your computer. The sender does not waive any privilege in the event this message was inadvertently disseminated." From: Warren Campbell �mailto:WCampbell vail.o�l Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:43 AM To: 'MARY_MCWILLIAMS@MCWILLIAMSLAW.COM' Cc: kl9steveC�hotmaiLcom Subject: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte Mary, My name is Warren Campbell and I am the Chief of Planning for the Town of Vail. I am sending this email as a follow-up to my voicemail. It sounded like you are out of the office so I thought I would send an email as you might have a device that you access when out of the office. As you are aware there is a request by the Wallners to replace their windows with tan windows to match the existing windows in their unit. The Wallners began the installation of their new windows prior to submitting an application to the Town of Vail to do so which has resulted in tan windows already having been installed. The windows were installed as the contractor believed they were a same for same replacement not needing a permit. Upon doing a site visit I discovered that Unit B currently has white windows and doors (with the exception of the two tan windows flanking the sliding door above the garage). This condition prompted me to research the Town's records to determine how the duplex structure ended up with different colored windows and doors. I discovered in 2005 (DRB050191) that a staff inember approved the white windows and noted that there was a mismatch of window colors in this structure. This staff inember at the time should have worked with you and the other half of the duplex to arrive at a solution where all the windows and doors in the structure were the same color as the Town Code contains a provision requiring architectural compatibility within a single structure (duplex). The Design Review Board has consistently required duplex structure to have matching window colors in order to have a unified architectural character. This correspondence today is an effort to resolve a condition which should not have been permitted to occur (the Town Staff accepts responsibility for this situation). I need to resolve this issue so that I can approve the Wallner's new windows. I have spoken to Stephen (the Wallner's contractor) and he has confirmed there are methods and products by which vinyl windows can be painted. This is one solution. The tan windows on the Wallner's unit could be painted white is another solution. I am seeking your input on other solutions. I do not know the lifespan of the white vinyl windows (surely more than 8 years), but if they were on your radar for replacement that might be an option as well. I am looking to work with you and the Wallners to resolve this issue in a way wear there is minimal impact to either owner, but results in matching colored windows and doors in the structure. Please let me know your thoughts so we can begin to move towards resolution. Regards, Warren Campbell � Warren Campbell From: stephen O'Brien <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:34 PM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar De) Norte Warren, Well that's great info on the paint, thank you! Please let me know what Mary's response is? Regards Steve O Sent on the Sprint° Now Network from my BlackBerry° -----Original Message----- From: Warren Campbell <WCampbell@vailgov.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:08:59 To: <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte I am aware of the issues on the neighboring duplex to the west and working on that one as well. You are correct that one half stuccoed their half and placed a bond for the other half which was stuccoed probably 5 years later. The same planner who created the situation on this structure created the situation on the structure to the west. I would rather attempt a painting solution of the vinyl if the other owners are amenable even if it may not last in perpetuity. I just did a search in Google and there are obviously varying opinions, but many suggest that Sherwin Williams Duration and Superpaint as a good solution. Apparently Sherwin Williams has a color pallet for vinyl as well as Benjamin Moore. They reference vinyl siding, but windows shouldn't be too different are they? I also found that there is a XIM Plastic and Vinyl Primer that helps paint adhere. http://www. benja m i nmoore.com/en-us/for-contractors/vi nyl-select http://www.sherwi n-wi I I iams.com/homeowners/color/fi nd-a nd-explore-colors/pai nt-colors-by-col lection/vi nylsafe- colors-for-vinyl-siding/ Not sure I follow your comment about siding replacement and removal of walls, but you can propose changes, but those changes need to work in architectural harmony with the other half of your duplex. If the vinyl windows are replaced soon we might be able to post a bond for that work like the stucco on the other duplex. -----Original Message----- From: stephen O'Brien [mailto:kl9steve@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:16 AM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte Warren, I have spoken with a couple of window specialists and they do not recommend painting of vinyl windows. Apparently there is no longevity in a paint solution that will last. We do have a few issues here. The next duplex up has three different colour windows. Front door painted outside of the original color scheme and the exterior was stucco'd. The east unit had stucco for nearly 13 years before the other side followed suit. When my owners apply for re-siding work next year, how do we justify replacing same for same when the neighbouring duplex have done away with deck walls and have completely changed the look of a duplex which was inherently the same as 1141A and B. I'm a super amicable person Warren, and I truly appreciate the effort that the TOV have gone through in order to rectify this small situation. I have to sympathise with the owners though. They have remained positive about keeping there unit intact and as close as possible from its 1978 conception. My owners would not want to install white windows because it detracts away from the look and inherent quality of a unit they bought as an investment. They have wanted to change the exterior colour for many years however, they deferred from doing this to creat harmony amongst other home owners of Casolar Dr. The neighbouring duplex have almost lost all identity to the Wallners residence. I'm not at the point of having to beg, but I'm getting close Warren! Lol..... I'm pretty sure that if 1141b have to replace there windows in the future, they would oblige Jack and Janie Wallner and bring there unit back in line with its original status. Could we get a exception in this circumstance? It would be very helpful... I thank you so much for your time Warren.. Regards Steve O'Brien Sent on the Sprint° Now Network from my BlackBerry° -----Original Message----- From: Warren Campbell <WCampbell@vailgov.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:42:55 To: <MARY MCWILLIAMS@MCWILLIAMSLAW.COM> Cc: <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Subject: Window Replacemetn at 1141 Casolar Del Norte Mary, My name is Warren Campbell and I am the Chief of Planning for the Town of Vail. I am sending this email as a follow-up to my voicemail. It sounded like you are out of the office so I thought I would send an email as you might have a device that you access when out of the office. As you are aware there is a request by the Wallners to replace their windows with tan windows to match the existing windows in their unit. The Wallners began the installation of their new windows prior to submitting an application to the Town of Vail to do so which has resulted in tan windows already having been installed. The windows were installed as the contractor believed they were a same for same replacement not needing a permit. Upon doing a site visit I discovered that Unit B currently has white windows and doors (with the exception of the two tan windows flanking the sliding door above the garage). This condition prompted me to research the Town's records to determine how the duplex structure ended up with different colored windows and doors. I discovered in 2005 (DRB050191) that a staff inember approved the white windows and noted that there was a mismatch of window colors in this structure. This staff inember at the time should have worked with you and the other half of the duplex to arrive at a solution where all the windows and doors in the structure were the same color as the Town Code contains a provision requiring architectural compatibility within a single structure (duplex). The Design Review Board has consistently required duplex structure to have matching window colors in order to have a unified architectural character. This correspondence today is an effort to resolve a condition which should not have been permitted to occur (the Town Staff accepts responsibility for this situation). I need to resolve this issue so that I can approve the Wallner's new windows. I have spoken to Stephen (the Wallner's contractor) and he has confirmed there are methods and products by which vinyl windows can be painted. This is one solution. The tan windows on the Wallner's unit could be painted white is another solution. I am seeking your input on other solutions. I do not know the lifespan of the white vinyl windows (surely more than 8 years), but if they were on your radar for replacement that might be an option as well. I am looking to work with you and the Wallners to resolve this issue in a way wear there is minimal impact to either owner, but results in matching colored windows and doors in the structure. Please let me know your thoughts so we can begin to move towards resolution. Regards, Warren Campbell Warren Campbell From: stephen O'Brien <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:26 PM To: Warren Campbell Subject: Re: I have completed my research Warren, Thank you for your time. I hope you had a good weekend? Sorry you have to come back to this... I would love to have this house sewn up before it gets too cold! Please don't hesitate to contact me. Regards Steve O'Brien 970 393 0926 O'Brien Home Services Po Box 422, Vail, 81658, Co Sent on the Sprint° Now Network from my BlackBerry° -----Original Message----- From: Warren Campbell <WCampbell@vail�ov.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:21:31 To: <kl9steve@hotmail.com> Subject: I have completed my research I will be in touch soon with my findings and the process moving forward. Regards, Warren 1