HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 4 LOT 8 TEXAS TOWNHOMES LEGAL,-t)Planning and Environmental Commission
t'il Vlta't- --1.{b-6^n h6mz> 4nry.( /q
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 Sorith Frcntage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci,vail,co,us
ProiectName: LIGHTHALLDORMER PECNumber: PECO4OO77
Project Description:
New dormer on north side of townhome with standing seam copper roof; all other materials to
match existing and no additional GRFA to result from the dormer addiUon.
Participants:
OWNER UGHTHALL,DIANEGAMEL LL|IS|?AO4 Phone:303-9854984
5293 W OBERUN DR
DENVER
co 8023s
License:
APPUCANT MICIIAEL SUMAN ARCHITECT, LLC1 1/15/2004 Phone: 97O-47 L-6122
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7760
AVON
co 81520
License:
ARCHfiECT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCHITECI, LLCILI L5 | 2004 Phone: 970-47 I-6L22
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7760
AVON
co 81620
License: C000001764
Project Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Locauon:
483 GORE CREEK D& UNIT #8
l.€gal Descriptlon: lot 8/9 Block Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FIUNG 4
Parcl ilumber: 210108235001
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
MoUon By: Lamb Action; APPROVED
Seond By: Jewitt
Vote: 6-0-1 (Kjesborecused) DateofApproval= l2/L3l20M
Conditions:
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Planner: ElisabethEckel PEC Fee Paid: $500.00
,t -. I
. Oonditional use Fermit. Floodplainftlodification. Mircr Ederior Alteralion. ilajor Exterior Alteration. Developrnent Plan. Amendment to a Dovelopment Plan. Zoning Code &nendment. \&tur. Siign Variance
$6so
$400
$650
$800
$15m
$250
,$ljlm-\Q50g/$m0
Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Gommission
Department of Community Development
75 Sorith Frontage Road, Vail, Colonado 81657
tef : 970.479.21 39 tax: 97O.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Informatlon:
All projecb requiring Planning and Environnental Oommission review must receive appro\61 prior to submitting a
building permit appli:ation. Ple6e refur to the submittal requirennnts br the partiorlar apgo\.al that is rcquesfied.
An appli:ation for Plannirg and Erwironrrental Cornmission rwieu, cannot be accepted until all rcquired inbnnation
is received by the Communig Development Department. The projec{ may also rreed to be reviewed by the Town
Courrcil and/or the D€sign Review Board.
Type of Appllcatlon and Fee:
Rercning $1300
ttlajor SuMivisbn $1500
Minor gibdivision $650
Erernption Pbt $650
Minor Arnendnrent to an SDD $1m0
l,lew Special Development District $6000
Major Amendrnent to an SDo $6000
lvbjor Arnendrnent to an SDD 51250
(no exteior modifications)
r0r4il\,#
Description of the Requet:
parcel No.: 2lolo823$ml (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Nameof Applauil' /4'a44/J4,"14"r, //'/'?/4t/ S^'r"4', Arltkel'., U4
lrlaillng Address:
E-mall Address:
ruiJr.d 2 <U,rrrt,or'4",' [reh eo,--
1 F ,r' n$r .'.itrE; . *-
I .r0v L 5 2004
I
tL---
',.c()M.DEV.
Location of the Proposal:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
't /za* 01./in
g$ffTJb"Jt' w,No.,/o/b av, A,LQ( +^
ItifeetingDate:='- L2-.lt'Otf peC_\.1
Page I of G04/0liO4
,tt
************'r***+*+*++++++++f+i*********t**********'t+*'|+l+++*i***+,t**************r.'f{.'r**|t 'tt*
TOWN OF VAIL. COLORADO Statement
*******lt{t**'t**t ****:}*rl********************************{r{r'}*'l*t *,}**'t**************!****!t*******
StaEement Number: R040007131 Amount: $500.00 ll/L5/2OO4O3:29 PM
Palment Method: Check Init: iIS
Notation: #1015/!.{fCIIAEL,
SUMEN ARCH
Permit No: P8C040077 Ttpe: PEC - variance
Parcel No: 210108235001
Site Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIIJ
Locatsion: 483 CTORE CREEK DR, ITNIT *8
Total Feea: $500.00
This Payment: $500.00 Total AIJIJ Pmts: $500.00
Balance: $0.00
**{.*'r**{.r.l.**'r.r.**r.*r.rrrr**d.*r.r.**r.'rr.{.******t l. *'l * l. * * 'l 'l l' * * *'f 'l 'lf * {.***** * * * * ********** * * ** * * * **** i * *
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descliption Current Pmts
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES 500.00
SUMAN
ANCHITECT
October 18.2004
Lightholl Residence Addition
Texos Townhomes Lots 8 & 9
Voil Villoge 4h Filing
A{locenl Properlles Llst
WESI
Nome: Voll lrollr Eolt
Zoning: High Density Mulfiple-Fomily
HOA Agent Morsholl Diggs
Address: 3981 South Dexfer Slreet
Englewood, CO 8Ol l0
Phone: 1.303.753.0054
SOUTH
Nome:
Zoning:
HOA Agent:
Address:
Nome:
Zoning:
EAST
Nome:
Zoning:
HOA Agent:
Address:
NORIH
Nome:
All Seqsom
High Density Mulliple'Fomily
Douglos Wesf
100 Sonds Point Rood, #313
Longbool Key,FL34228
Aplllo Pork
Oufdoor Recreoiion, Porking
Mqnor Vqll
High Density Mulfiple-Fomily
Bob McCleory
595 Eqst Voil Volley Drive
Voil, CO 81657
Gore Creek
m ichael@sumanarchitect.com
143 East Meadow Drivg
Suite 300
Vail, CO 8165t
970.479.7502
f 970.479.7srr
n 970.471.6122
ANCHITECT
October 18,2001
Lighfholl Residence Addition
Texos Townhomes Lots 8 & 9
Voil Villoge 4rh Fillng
Vorionce Applicolion for Side Setbock
RE: Secfion l2-6H-6, Setbock, Voil Town Code
l. Dercrlpllon of Voriqnce Requesled
The vorionce being requesfed will ollow opproximotely 140 sqff of GRFA ond o roof dormer lo be
construcled within the side setbock. The proposed shed dormer oddifion will be locoled on lhe norlh
side of the existing roof within lhe existing building footprint. The proposed shed roof slopes down from
lhe exisling roof ridge to minimize lhe impocl on bulk ond moss. The proposed qdditionol GRFA will be
locofed on the fhird floor within lhe envelope of lhe proposed dormer.
2. Precedence
The requesled vorionce is similor lo oiher vorionces thot hove been gronted in lhe Texos Townhomes
(Units lA, 18,2A,4A,48, ond 68) ond will qllow fhis slruclure to be treoted equolly. Therefore, the
proposed vorionce in nol o gront of speciol privilege.
3. Hordshlp
The Texos Townhomes were constructed prior to zoning ond were rendered non-conforming ihe doy
ihey were zoned. Becouse fhe lots ore only 25'{" wide ond lhe required side setbocks for High Density
Multiple-Fomily Districf ore 20'{", it is impossible lo moke ony exlerior or slructurol chonge wilhoul o
vorionce.
4. Eftect on llght ond olr, dlrtrlbuflon of populollon, lronrporfolion ond lrofrc fqcllllles, elc.
The proposed vorionce will hove no negolive impocfs on these items.
michael@sumanarchitect.com
143 East Meadow Drive
Suite 300
Vail, CO 81657
970.479.7s02
f 970.479.75rr
n 970.471.6122
:!J!
zn! t;;i!E;tl
IEB
1.,,
!""
lrt;
qS *
{l>i1l i , ,!t;3 t
F
'rr @i5 tl
|Ii
l$
I
;i:!il:iirlt
?q=
;: itir
iili
Ei;i:gilli
rl!;,e
Eq: !i
I
T&ti
EIEl
I
2##
bi
d,': >
\h
Io
d,
9t22,
t
:P
:e
I .u!t;s
il ii
r:t!!l-r
iiiir
!;tii
Efiii:>!X
.'.aifo
=o'14Szg+5ld
XgJ=qje9s9ff
lii:
lIii:
. i;3!i\/ |t'iilli
t
FE
t,\
/:EE
lsr
E
:i
F6
t
s 00 c2 00' E - s4.64
5:
95It
i
Y
a--)
=o
(,: -
o
I
I ll\l6Y- N dtA(^W
WV,h( fn'yrnnt'f fu Wt'wxttWWWl'
oRtGtNA/.*
Planning and Environmental Commission
Gommunity Development Department
December 13,2004
A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks,
Vaif Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yadances, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a dormer addition located at 4tl3 Gore Creek Drive/Unit 8
(Texas Townhomes/Lots I & 9, Vail Village 4h Filing and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
Applicant Diane Lighthall, represented by Michael Suman Archilect,
LLCPlanner: Elisabeth Eckel
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
The applicant, Michael Suman Architect LLC,
Texas Townhomes/Unit 8, 483
Gore Creek Drive.
. Based upon Statf's
review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and
testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends
approval of a variance to allow for the proposed construction, subject lo the
findings noted in Seclion lX of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REOUEST
The applicant is proposing a dormer addition to an existing residence, at 483
Gore Greek Drive, Texas Townhomes Unit 8. The proposed change includes a
new shed dormer on the upper floor to the north side of the residence. AD
nf"- 't-lt!!^:-
5. The dormer will not encroach into the rear or stream setbac'ks.
A vicinity map, the applicant's request, proposed archilectural plans, and photos
of the site have been attached for reference (see Attachments A, B, G, and D).
The provisions of Chapter 12-'17 (Yariance), Vail Town Code, determine the
review criteria and review procedures for a variance requesl.
BACKGROUND
The Texas Townhomes were originally constructed in 1965. Due to their location
on twenty-five foot (25') wide lots with twenty foot (20') side setbacks, the
Townhomes are configured in such a way so as lo make new conslruction,
renovation, or structural changes impossible without the granting of a variance
from the side setback regulations. All of the existing units are already
encroaching into the side setbacks and are therefore legally non-conforming in
regard to that requirement of the High Density Multiply Family (HDMF) district.
The applicant is requesting a dormer addition in the
head height and maximizing the usable space on
residence.
inlerest of increasing
the upper level of
The Design Review Board was
supportive of the aesthetics of the proposal and directed Staff to administratively
approve the design review application should the requested variance be
approved by the PEC.
ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
Order ol Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the
Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the
Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning.
Planning and Environmental Commission:
Action:The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final
approval/denial/approval with condltlons of a variance.
The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for
evaluating a proposal for:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the
Town.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution ol population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities,
and other public facilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to
the proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title.
Conformance with development standards of zone district
Lot area
the
the
tv.
V.
Setbacks
Building Height
Density
GRFA
Site coverage
Landscape area
Parking and loading
Mitigation of development impacts
Design Review Board:
Action:The Design Review Board has NO review authorlty on a variance, but
must review any accompanying Design Review Board applicalion.
Town Council:
Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission
may be appealed to the Town Council or by lhe Town Council. Town Council
evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design
Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with
modifications, or overturn the board's decision.
Staff:
The staff is responsible lor ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided
and plans conform to the technical requiremenls of the Zoning Regulations. The
staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff memorandum containing background on the property and
provides a statf evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and
findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial.
Staff also facilitates the review process.
APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to
the review of this proposal:
TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS
Chapter 12-6H: High Density Multiple Family District
12-6H-1: Purpose: The high density multiple-family distrtd is intended to provide
sites for multiple-family &vellings at densities to a maximum of twenty tive (25)
dwelling units per aae, together with such public and semipublic facilities and
lodges, private recreation facilities and related visitor oriented uses as may
appropriately be located in the same district. The high density multiple-family
district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities
commensurate with high density apartment, condominium and lodge uses, and to
maintain the desirable residential and resort qualities of the district by
establishing appropriate site development standards. Ceftain nonresidential uses
are permitted as conditional uses, which relate to the nature of Vail as awinter
and summer recreation and vacation community and, where permitted, are
intended to blend harmoniously with the residentialcharacter of the district.
vt.
12-6H-6: Setbacks: The minimum front setback shall be twenty teet (20'),
the minimum side setback shall be twenty feet (20'), and the minimum
rear setback shall be twenty feet (20').
Chapter 1 2-17: Variances
12-17-1: Purpose:
A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: ln order to Nevent or to lessen such practical
difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of
this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement,
variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of
a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical
conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical
limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or
inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation
shall not be a reason for granting avariance.
VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
Staff believes that the following goals of the Vail Village Master Plan are relevant
to the review of this proposal:
#1 Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and identity.
#3 To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughout the Village.
SITE ANALYSIS
Address:483 Gore Creek Drive, Texas Townhomes Unit 8
Legal Description: Lots 8 and 9A/ail Village 4h Filing
-;I
Land Use Plan Designation: Vail Village Master Plan
Current Land Use:Residential
Allowed/ReouiredDevelopment Standard
Setbacks (min):
Rear:
Density (max):
GRFA (max):
Building Height (max)
Site Coverage (max):
Landscape Area (min)
Parking (min):
20 ft.
2 unils
2,385.64 sq. ft.
48 ft.
1,726.45 sq. ft. (55%)
941.7 sq. ft. (30%)
3 spaces
Prooosed
-33 tt. (no change)
1 unit (no change)
2,385.64 sq. ft. (no change)
30 ft. (no change)
1,726.45 sq. ft. (no change)
941.7 sq. ft. (no change)
3 spaces (no change)
25.1 fl. (no
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Land Use
North: Residential
South: Open Space
East: Residential
West: Residential
Zonino
High Density Multiple-Family
Outdoor Recreation, Parking
High Density Multiple-Family
High Density Multiple-Family
CRITERIAAND FINDINGS
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12-17,
VailTown Code.
A. Consideration of Factors Reqardino the Setback Variances:
1. The relatlonship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures In the vlclnity.
The applicant has received written approval from lhe Texas
Townhome Association for the proposed exterior change. Statf
does not believe this proposal will negatively affect the existing or
potential uses and structures in lhe vicinig in comparison to the
, because of the Townhomes' location adjacent to the
Creek,
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal
interpretation and enforcement ol a specified regulation is
necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity ot
treatment among sites in the vlclnlty or to attain the
objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Given the previous approvals of side setback variances lor other
Townhomes within this developmenl, Statf believes this proposal
requests an equally appropriale degree of relief from lhe strict and
literal interpretation and enforcemenl of a specified regulation and
is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity and to attain the objectives of the
Town's development without granting a special privilege. Staff has
made the finding, pursuant to Section 12-17-1, that a practical
difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship exists from 'the size,
shape, or dimensions of a site" due to the narrow proportions of
each of the Texas Townhomes lots.
The effect of the requested variance on light and air,
distribution of population, transportation and tratflc facilitles,
public facilities and utllltles, and public safety.
Staff does not believe that the further encroachment into the side
setbacks will have a significant impact on light and air, distribution
of population, transportation and traflic facilities, public facilities
and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commlssion deems
appllcable to the proposed variance.
The applicant's proposal was conceptually reviewed by the Design
Review Board at its December 1, 2004, public hearing, which was
supportive of the proposal. The applicant has represented to the
Town of Vail that this proposal will not significantly alter the
structures or grounds of the lots or units.
The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino
findinos before orantino a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other
properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following
reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enlorcement of the
specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that
do not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges
enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
IX. STAFF RECOMMENDANON
TheCommunityDeVe|opmentDepar|ment#ofavariancefrom
Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, to allow for a dormer addition located at
483 Gore Creek Drive/Unit 8 (Texas Townhomes)/Lots I and 9, Vail Village 4h Filing.
Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the following
findings:
x.
ff'rconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
jurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is wananted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the
specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this litle.
b. There are exceptions or exlraordinary circumstances or
condilions applicable to the same sile of the variance that
do not apply generally to other properlies in lhe same
zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges
enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicant's Request
C. Archilectural Plans
D. Photos of the Site
E. Public Notice
Attachment A
IEr
;bv
5EE;83sp3.
a6;-r
r9
FIN*
A€
:i99IP
!
!
g
;
E
OE
SUM N
Attachment B
NCHITECT
November 15,2004
Lighfholl Residence Addition
Texos Townhomes Lots I & 9
Voil Villoge 4rh Filing
Vorionce Applicofion for Side Setbock
RE: Section l2-6H-6, Selbocks, Voil Town Code
l. Descdpllon of Vqrlqnce Requesled
The vorionce being requested will ollow o roof dormer thof increoses bulk ond moss lo be consfrucfed
wifhin fhe side setbock. The proposed shed dormer oddition will be locqted on the north side of the
existing roof within lhe existing building foolprinl. The proposed shed roof slopes down from lhe existing
roof ridge lo minimize the impocf on bulk qnd mqss.
2. Precedcnce
The requested vorionce is similor lo othervodonces lhol hove been gronted in lhe Texos Townhomes
(Units I A, lB,2A, 4A,48, ond 68) ond will ollow this slructure to be lreofed equolly. Therefore, fhe
proposed vorionce in nol q gront of speciol privilege.
3. Hordshlp
The Texos Townhomes were conslrucled pdor fo zoning ond were rendered non-conforming the doy
they were zoned. Becouse the lots ore only 25'{" wide qnd the required side selbocks lor High Density
Multiple-Fomily District ore 20'{", il is impossible to moke ony exlerior or structurql chonge without o
vorionce.
4. Efiecf on llght ond olr, dkftlbullon ol populolion, honsporlollon ond frqfic focllllles, efc.
The proposed vorionce will hove no negotive impocts on lhese ilems.
m ichael@sumanarchitect.com
143 East Meadow Drive
Suite 300
Vail, CO 81657
970.479.7502
f 970.479.7srrn 970-471.6122
tr$Elta lltEllrtErrsnoHilnoJ. l.|vHlltctlII||t t/||ri lcari'l
olr!lFIol
=l<lEI
utlzl||llol
6l2lol
EI>lrtlEIolot<l
o(,
Jr(
(t
--J
E
IFE
DoIL
ltlg
J.l-
.l-
d
do
FtJ
-!,:r:t:l!lrli.lttll:r!rrt6tr..!..trr!rIl!rtfu.ia!irrr-!atraglccoEesrrt!,rlr!-Et!!FPrt!'li9
trrciEri{!t:rr9p!r6,AoarlilErtB"strir!.9sitr!!irr.nEttrtsic€ttt!688d;'!lt!*rr!Ilorrrrltl3s
3uE
If;EE:
gEHH;E
qrr:q-.1Itlllt
!rtt
lir;ii
!i;
!it
934
Egliill ift llii iift ft fi !! lll lillil' lliii ill llil
3lololTI>lol
cl
EI
HI-t
ag a : e : 3 t a
ltl
()
=ltloIoultr
JJ
(
-F
-c'IJ
riliiilr,eii,l,rfu!lufu,,ri,iliirli,,i,;,ili,,!iir;Ehstuh,:gllrliriilurE!i,!Eli;*,
i'ia
t"ttll
d,g
I
@
.. I!iltE
ffiNmilil
i'
@
iltt
Eg
a
Iri
Ell,rr ffiffiN8ffic luau,u.lcBuv
-vEt6lt !{nmltl[tltsnoHilnor llvHlHct.|rr tatt ttttl ltt t -r rrtl
TI=I
lii ql
z
JI
1l
>l
uJlJltl!,llFIolq
9lZlb
trl'rg!t:
illi
@
so "l o
z
5[1
JIurl>lullJl
GIutlFIorl<l.l
olull
8t:
Sli
Eli
@
illlt;t;'i
["
t:
t?il:i$?
I
I2l
5lcltrlololcl
ollrtl
Blr
bli
Eli
@
dttcloaY^ qnqmrtvlr
sSnOHNnOl rrvHrlrgllolt t.lt lrat rva I dr a rlll
[----l
l,E c'i i
iEE <i
r-'=r I
llE ll l
t=Eill
tHEil |
l
l
l
l
i
I
I
&***#ftrr#r
Ei
=lol
FI<l>I|r|IJI
uIl
ll1-ltlolzl
(9l
zlb
FIi
El-i
tlr
@
?+s*E
:B dd.t H
E5t,---ll ^ tftffi ^ !;! llLtll(9 ! | I ll l(9 l;
+-, I + : +
*fi
ff if;r iE If
is{; !i E ",irl;ilEilgE
oorrq|oolv li|rbrraolattElrsnoHlrnor l1vr{rHcrratuxDE t| ai tdrrrrr
zlol
FI<l>l
u.tlJI
uJl
FIU'I<l
uJl
9lzt4
dIi
XI:
uJlI
-/,1\q9
i
r
l2tiol
iFlr<li>li l|llrJli url
^r FlIol!t <l
I I llJlli ol6! l|llri clt.5i ot:I Gt_,i ol_rl dt:i qlE
i rE\r t.5{,| !-./
i
t;
€:
t--T
I
Er
tli3:
+&ifft,- 1!
II
****$tr fl T,ff r
++ssir $'
{r5rEiL xrtErtEr
SSNOHilNOI I1VHTHOTIrrltt ttFtt tn^ Irr arat
z
9
o.ulltrlJI<tzl
oltl
EIolzlol
(9l
zlb
Ft.
9,1,tli
@
2
9
o
UJol
JI<l-loltlFI
19l-lolJl
ol
uJl
8htll
Eli
@
"L
ortrE lrr llElIltEtrsnoHilnol l1vHlHcrl
-rttr Dtlt tr ldrllqr
zlol
FIul
u,llol
vrl6lolEI(rl
(|,l
::lh
Etlgt!
tlt/L\\P
zlol
FIolulatl
ol
aalol
E,Iol
otull
8t:
Sll
Eli
@
,a\
,aI
Attachment D
SUMAN
ApcHtt tc r
LIGHTHATL RESIDENCE REMODEL
south side imooe
i6s
10.1',r.04 TOV REVIEW
SU}'IANltcHttEct
tIGHIHAtL RESIDENCE REMODET
north side imoges
t0.1r.u IOV REVIEW
RESIDENCEtIGHTHAtT REMODEI
north context imoges
10.il.04 TOV REVIEW
.:.
SUl,lAHancHttEct
tIGHIHAtt RESIDENCE REMODET
siding ond window design exomple imoges
r0.r r.o4 IOV REVIEW
sul'laH
t/
RESIDENCE REMODET
north conlext imoges
tIGHTHAtT
r0.r r.o4 IOV REVIEW
AITACHI{ENT E
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE **#p
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail on December 13, 2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration
of:
A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional
Uses; Generally (On All Levels of a Building or Outside of a Building), Vail Town Code, to allow^
for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district, located at
714 West Lionshead CircleiParcel 3, Lionshead Penthouses and Lot C, Morcus Subdivision,
and setting forth details in regard thereto.Applicant: Vail Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning GroupPlanner: Warren Campbell
A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17 ,Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at
483 Gore Creek Drive/Unit 8 (Texas Townhomes)/Lots 8 & 9, VailVillage 4'n Filing and setting forth
details in regard thereto.Applicant: Diane Lighthall, represented by Michael Suman Architect, LLCPlanner: Elisabeth Eckel
A request for review of a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a resubdivision of the West Day Lot, Vail Marriott Mountain Resort, and
Gore Creek Residences properties, located at720,724,728 West Lionshead Circle, 730 South
Frontage Road West, and 825 West Forest Road/Lots A-D, Morcus Subdivision and Parcel 3
Lionshead Penthouses, and setting forth detail in regard thereto.Applicant: Vail Corporation, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for final review of a variance, from Section 12-6G-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a variance to allow for a
residential addition, located at4242 East Columbine Way/Lot 8, Bighorn Terrace, and setting
forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant:
Planner:
Kathryn Benysh
Bill Gibson
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-21381or additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call
(97O) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published, November 26,2004, in the Vail Daily.
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Elisabeth Eckel
George Ruther
fn4l2o041:56:05 PM
lots 8/9 texas to\ /nhomes
Hi George:
From my research of the file, it seems that the extension/expansion of the above residence (without
additional GRFA) could be interpreted as allowed OR prohibited.
1) The followinq wording would be suooortive of an addition as prooosed:
ftom the non-conforming section:
"...provided that no such nonconicrming use shall be enlarged to occupy the greater site or building floor
area than it occupied on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chaptef'
"...any dwelling unit in a multi-family dwelling shall be eligible for additional GRFA not to exceed a
maximum of 250 square feet...provided that no exterior additions or altenations to multi-family dwellings,
with the exception of windor skylights or other similar modifications, shall be allowed."
from a neighboring homeowner
'...1 talked to Rod Slifer before 8AB was sold and he thought that any buyer would not be able to alter the
outsidei n any way but they could probably get permission to alter the attic if they did not increase the
square footage..."
2) However. the following wording would be less supportive of an addition as orooosed:
notes from file:
"...perimeter lines not to be exceeded...
lefter from file:
"...also keep in mind that because this bldg. was a legal non-conforming building, the additional 500
square feet czrnnot, and will not, result in any change to the mass and bulk of the previously existing shell
of the building."
letter from file:
"...staff agreed with your contention that the existing perimeter line of the building establishes the legal
extent of the buildings setback nonconformity. Existing and new GRFA (250's) may be rearranged within
the shell of the existing building, and underyround, as long as the perimeter lines are not exceeded. Any
above grade expansion of the building which would extend beyond the perimeter line established by the
existing building walls, or break the plane of the existing roof or chimney lines, would require variances
from the nonconforming and setback sections of the Code..."
action iorm from file:
the building will be "...rebuilt to exactly match the mass and bulk of the existing building. No expansion of
the exterior shell of the building is proposed or allowed."
letter from file:
"the applicant intends to match the mass and builk of the existing building exactly, including all wall
locations and roof elevations..."
Why have several of the other units been allowed dormer additions (without GRFA) as this unit is
requesting, by simply going through the PEC process? Vvhat would make this unit unique from that rule?
\Mtat are your thoughts??
Thanks!
Elisabeth
cc:Bill Gibson; Matt Gennett; Wanen Campbell
F"sign Review Action r?t
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone: U
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: tot#{ 26tfBtock
-
zone District / -
Project Street Address:
Commenls:
LI
qs "/ t's{-e q G"r-t ,9€cL,#ot
r ^ @?taff Action
*orrono, RoL &tot {- Vote: s--O
seconded ov' -SqC()' 4/o*
rffi;# v-ffi , * -(,y Le),,' -le
" o;t i - : lf<na;',a
q e ehs ti a (v o77n'"'
" ;;ffi", 4,t*i:oi*d inn-rt# tffi ';/;: a W;fr# " n:
c ba *Pfcz',i',"l S-{qG.
('
Lal
he(9le fw-*(vtg {1,* CtrApCqT S*arr t-sS,r)Q./refieYg bn'pqiorq q teg-tqs+ €"t /.g to,ta ( *e
€€ €ot'J+L,+i i t{/F(Lo q*t.\ aJfrwv4 L.r
Toffn Planner
,n*t, /A,, , ,'/------7---T DRB Fee er"-p^to # 2O@' --v-
:,, I
l. Viele Construction has confirmed that the Manor Vail properfy has been approved for
construction staging.
A101
1. The stair structure has been changed from slab on grade to wood frame because of structural
conditions that became apparent upon excavation. There is now a space under the stair that the
owner would like to use as storage. We do not intend to add additional GRFA by limiting the
height of this space to 5'.
2. T\elaundry has been moved from the cornmon area mechanical into the lower unit'
A102
1. A grate has been added to the front door entry'
2. The tub has been relocated per the revised GRIA calculations submitted 8125194-
A104
1. The door to the outside deck has been changed per the revised GRFA calculations submitted
8l2s/94.
2. The wall thickness on the north wall has been reduced from 10" to 6", but the revised GRFA
calculations of 8/25194 are correct.
L202
1. As submitted by KRM structural consultants 6122/94 per your request, the footings are
cantilevered and not spread. As you may be aware, structural drawings always supersede the
architectural in regards to foundation design.
clarifrcation.
A203a
ct
a-Ca du+*.- 3
/ €ereruzu,f ol^u lril. 7.r,*^< ear^*6. :fr --_ _-
,2.
ptca*"..;A-X /*"2 S --)
- aro-4h.
/2"'f
-y"
&-< =
3-
CCIPVF II.E
75 Sourh Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138 / 479-2r 39
FAX 303-479-2452
October 25,1994
D e partue nt of Conununiry D eve lopment
Diana Donovan
Homestake Circle.co 81657
RE: Response to letter regarding the Thain and Cornice Building redevelopments
Dear Diana:
. As the planner who handled both of the redevelopment projects referred to in your letter dated
october 13, 1994 to the Planning and Environmental commission (pEc), Design Review
Board (DRB), staff, and Town Council, I thought I would drop you a note in response to some
of the comments made in your letter.
As you know, the Thain remodel was reviewed by the DRB on May 4, May 18, and June 1,
1994. The June 1st DRB approval contained six conditions. For your information, I have
enclosed a copy of a letter that was written to Lynn Fri2len, the Thains' archilect, which
details the DRB conditions of approval. As you can see, Condition 5 of the DRB approval
states that "any trees or shrubs on or adjacent 10 the propedy that die as a result of the
construction of the Thain residences, must be replaced with like species and size".
Once a construction permit is issued for a project, the planning staff relies on the building
inspectors to ensure that the building is being constructed per the approved construction
drawings. This, of course. includes the construction staging plan and any other elements of
the approved building permit set of plans.
ln a fetter sent to Ms. Fritzlen on September 2, 1994, staff did point out that it had come to
our attention that the contractor was using Town of Vail owned property direcily behind the
Thain residence for construction staging. In the September 2, 1994 letter we informed the
applicant that the staging of equipment on Town land is not acceptable and was not shown on
the approved plans and requested that they desist from using public property for the
construction of the Thain residences. I will relay your current concern, regarding compliance
with the approved staging plan, to Gary Murrain, Chief Building Official, and request that an
inspection be done on the property to assure that Town of Vail land or any other land not
shown on the approved construction staging plan is not being used for construction staging
purposes.
With regard to your comment concerning the applicant's two "250 additions", you are correct
in that Units 8A and 88 have increased in size by 500 square feet. However, the applicant
was able to show that eqch 250 was direcily attributable to each of the
Mrs.
1014
Vail,
dwelling units.
usly existing
Mrs. Donovan
October 25, 1994 \
Page Two
As you know, lhe Cornice Building Special Development District (SDD) received extensive
review by the PEC and Town Council before ultimately receiving DRB approval. At this time,
staff has no reason to believe that the Cornice Building is not being constructed according to
the approved plans.
-:
I hope the above information clarifies some of the issues which you raised regarding the two
projects. I will discuss your letter with Gary Murrain and request that the building inspectors
keep close tabs on the construction of these two proJects to ensure that the approved building
permit construction drawings, and all conditions of approval, are being followed.
lf you should have any additional questions or comments regarding lhese projects in the
future, please feelfree to callme directly at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
xc: Mike Mollica
Planning and Environmental Commission
Design Review Board
Town Council
Gary Murrain/Building lnspectors
/1, r
f*n \-<
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
- ..!
F'l.t r'lP]r
TOWN AFVAIL
75 Sourh Frontage Road.
Vail, Colorado 81657
30i-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 30i-479-2452
September 2, 1994
Deparunent of Conntunity Development
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Clarification of zoning issues related to the remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A,
, 88, and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing
Dear Lynn:
This letter is intended to respond to your letter received in our office August 10, 1 994
requesting further clarification on several zoning issues affecting the above-referenced
remodel. I have provided a response to each of the items listed in your letter as follows:
1. Cold roof addition up to 6 inches in depth - The Community Development policy
dated April 3, 1991 states that a cold roof vent, not exceeding 12 inches in
height, measured from the sheathing to the top of the shingles, is considered
an architectural projection and will not be included in the height.
2. Plumbino roof ve4ts that proiect above the roof - Staff agrees that it is
acceptable to relocate the plumbing roof vents as long as the projection will be
the same as what previously existed.
Window sill proiections less than 3 inches - As discussed with you previously,
window sill projections will not be allowed. ln my letter to you dated May 13, .
1994,
3.
Since you did not
document the exact locations of window sill projections on the building before it
was torn down, there is no way for staff to assure that the new window sill
projections exactly match the old. lf you feel that window sill projections are
necessary, it would be acceptable lo move the entire buiHing wall in 3 inches.
This would allow window sills to project no further than the previous building
wallline.
', 1'
Ms. Fiitzlen
September 2,
Page Two
1994
Ornamental brick work proiections uo to 3 inches - Please see response to
question number 3 above.
Roof gutters and down soouts less than 6 inches in dimension - Staff does not
believe that roof gutters and down spouts are integral to the mass and bulk of
the building and will allow for them assuming they have received Design
Beview Board (DRB) approval.
Floof eave extensions uo to I inches - Please see response to question number
3 above.
Skvlioht curbs and flashinq - Staff feels that skylight curlrs and flashing would
be acceptable provided they are reasonable in size and the projection is kept to
a minimum (does not include bubble or dome type) and they have received
DRB approval.
8. Status of the exterior soiral stair - As stated on your approved DRB plans and
building permit construction drawings, the spiral staircase was not supposed to
be removed at any time during the construction. Therefore, you are currently in
violation of your building permit. I have spoken with Dan Stanek, Town of Vail
Building Inspector, as well as Gary Murrain, Town of Vail Chief Building Official,
regarding the ability to replace the spiral stair. Both Gary and Dan agreed that
the spiral stair cannot be replaced due to the fact that it does not currently meet
building code. However, since the spiral stair was required to remain as a part
. of your project approval, Gary and Dan had no objection to you modifying the
existing stair or providing a new stair which does meet code and replacing it per
the approved plans. A new stair would need to match the old stair in terms of
size, shape, circumference, etc. and receive DRB approval.
I hope the above information is helpful to you as you proceed with the remodel of the Thain
residence. However, if additional information or clarification is necessary, please feel free to
give me a call at 479-2138. lf there are portions of this letter which the Thains do not agree
with and wish to appeal, they may do so according to the procedures outlined in Chapter
18.66.030 of the Vail Municipal Code. Staff would recommend, however, that if the Thains do
not agree with this letter, or any portion of it, you do not proceed with revised drawings or
construction of any of the items of this letter until the Planning and Environmental Commission
(PEC) has had the opportunity to review staff's opinion on all items contained in this letter.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sincerely,"fi';*-#
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
Tom Moorhead
Mike Mollica
XC:
Ms. Fritzlen
September 2, 1994.
Page Three
P.S. lt has come to our attention that your contractor is using Town of Vail owned land
directly behind the Thain residence for construction staging. The staging of equipment
on Town land is not acceptable and was not shown on your approved plans. Please
desist lrom using public property for the construction of the Thain residences.
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
FII-E. C$PY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
June 13. 1994
An appeal ol a staff decision regarding nonconforming structures,
demo/rebuilds, setbacks, and the use ot the 250 Ordinance pertaining to the
Thain development proposal located at 483 Gore Creek Drive/Lots 8A, 88, and
9, Texas Townhouses, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Appellant: Jay Peterson, representing Helen ChatfieldPlanner: Jim Curnutte
I. INTRODUCTION
Jay Peterson, on behalf of Helen Chatfield, owner of Lot 7, Texas Townhomes, is appealing
all items set forth in the staff interpretation letter dated May 13, 1994 regarding a proposed
remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 88, and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing
(see attached copy). The Texas Townhomes are zoned High Density Multi-Family (HDMF).
The Thains own two units located at the easternmost end of the Texas Townhomes. The
Thains would like to tear down Units 8A and 88 and construct two new residences in their
place (keeping only the western and southern building foundation walls). Because ol the way
the Texas Townhomes property has been subdivided, the existing building is considered to be
nonconforming with regard to minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. The Thains have
agreed that the new building would not increase the existing mass and bulk of the building.
Additionally, the Thains have applied to use two 250 additions in conjunction with the
proposed construction of the new building.
Since Mr. Peterson is appealing all items set fortn in the staff letter dated May 13, 1994.
Each of the six paragraphs therein will be further discussed as follows:
Paraoraph #1 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"The Thain property is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is
nonconforming with regard to minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. lt
is considered to be a legally nonconforming building. Staff agrees with
your interpretation of the nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal
Code which would allow the Thains to remove a substantial portion of the
building and build an entirely new building-
%The proposed stairs on the rear of the
building, as presented at conceptual Design Review Board (DRB) review,
would be considered a violation of the non-conforming section of the
Gode. Stafl believes that the rear access to the basement must be
removed."
Staff Response
Section 18.64.010 (Purpose) of the nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code states
that:
"This chapter is intended to limit the number and extent of nonconforming uses
and structures by prohibiting. or limiting their enlargement, their reestablishment
after abandonment, and their restoration after substantial destruction. While
permitting nonconforming uses, structures and improvements to continue, this
chapter is intended to limit enlargement, alteration, restoration, or replacement
Additionally, Section 18.64.040 (Uses) states that:
"The use ol the site or structure lawfully established prior to the effective date
of the ordinance codified in this tifle which does not conform to the use
regulations prescribed by this title for the district in which it is situated may be
continued,
..
Staff considered the following elements before determining that the Thains could substantially
remodel their unit:
A. The intent of the nonconforminq section ol the Code. - Generally,
nonconforming sections of zoning codes are created for the purpose of assuring
the eventual removal of noxious uses or activities that are not compatible with
surrounding uses. Staff believes that the Texas Townhomes' nonionformity
was created as a result of the method used to subdivide the property and we
would not consider the entire building to be the type ot nonconforming use
which should eventually be removed from the property. In light of the fact that
the staff believes that the Town is not attempting to require the eventual
removal of the entire building from the property, and due to the fact that the
Town does encourage the upgrade of older buildings throughout town, staff has
looked at the proposed remodel of the Thain residence as something that would
be of benefit to the Town provided the new building did not increase the
discrepancy between the existing conditions and the development standards
established by the property's zoning.
h!d4T'" "t^"- ^- 'r-l"l
ur"la nrl h^r^^'^^^^- in ]tt lttt e! t lllll!u[ tlu tuilrldt l- In'l hrr ilr
new structure as lono as the nonconformitv is not increased? - Section
18.64.060 (Maintenance and Repairs) states that:
develooment standards prescribed by this title."
B.
"Nonconforming uses, structures, and site improvements may be
maintained and repaired as necessary for convenient, safe, and
efficient operation of the use, provided that the maintenance and
repair does not increase the discrepancy between the use,
structure, or site improvement and the development slandar:d
prescribed in the Town Code."
Section 18.64.090 (Restoration) states that:
"Whenever a nonconlorming use which does not conform
with the regulations of the district in which it is located or
a nonconforming structure or site improvement which
does not conform with the requirements for setbacks,
height, density control, building bulk control, or site
coverage is destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of
God, or by the public enemy, its use may be resumed or
the structure may be restored, provided the restoration is
commenced within one year and diligently pursued to
completion."
Although the above paragraph does not include reference to the voluntary
removal. of a nonconforming building, it does seem clear that a nonconforming
use or structure may be restored within one year after its demolition.
C. Complete or substantial removal. - The Town has previously determined that a
tear down/rebuild is the "ultimate remodel". Because of this determination and
the fact that two of the building's foundation walls will remain, staff believes that
this application should be considered a substantial remodel of an existing
building rather than a complete removal ol a non-conforming structure.
Paraoraph f2 from the Mav 13.1994letter:
"The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes two additional 250
square foot applications. Section 18.71.030 H (Additional Gross
Resadential Floor Area)r
5 The Thains are proposing to utilize two 250 ordinances for the
two dwelling units within the existing shell of the building and construct a
basement when the new building is constructed.
-
since the 250 section of the code does not allow for the pooling of
additional GRFA, it is important that each 250 square foot addition be
directly attributed to each dwelling unit."
Staff Response
Since the Thain units (Units 8A and 8B) have been in existpnce for more than five years, theyareentit|edtoapplyfortwoadditiona|250square|ootadditions.%
I
fi%Additional|y,the250ordinancedoesnola||ow|orthepoo|ingof
additional GRFA, iherefore, each of the 250's must be directly attributed to the existing
dwelling units.
Paraoraph #3 from the Mav 13. 1994 tetter:
"Staff does not believe that the bullding will become more nonconforming with
the addition of the proposed 250 applications. The 250 section of the Vail
Municipal Code does allow for the addltion ot 250 square teet of GRFA per unit
in addition to the existing GRFA on a propeny even lf the existing GRFA on the
property already exceeds the allowable. This provision applies to all properties
throughout town and is not specific to the Thain resldence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Additionally, statf agrees with your contention that the existing perimeter line of
the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity. ltfhgr
ln thA ali^ll ^"L- ^-:-^:-t
expansions are permitted provided they do not extend beyond the perimeter
lines established by the existing building footprint. Variances would be required
for below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building footprint."
Staff Resoonse
Staff does not believe that the existing building will become more nonconforming as a result of
the 250 additions because the existing mass and bulk of the building will be unaffected. Also,
there would not be any increase in the discrepancy between the existing conditions and the
development standards allowed in the HDMF zone district.
With regard to the setback nonconformity, statf has made the interpretation that the existing
perimeter line of the building establishes the legal extent ot the setback nonconformity.
Existing and new GRFA may be rearranged within the shell of the existing building, and
unclerground, as lglg_ngllg jglrn -.ter lines are not exceeded. ffi
Paraoraph #4 from the Mav 13. 1994 lettgr:
"Stafi dbes not agree wlth Jay Peterson's interpretation that the Thain units
should lall into the single family dwelling and two famlly dwelling category
described in Section 18.71.020 ol the Vait Municipal Code. We believe that the
Thain residence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelling criterla outlined in
Section 18.71.030. Section 18.04.090 of the Vail Municipal Gode defines multi-
family dwellings as:
"A building containing three or more dwelling units, including
townhouses, rowhouses, apartments, and condominium units,
designed for or used by three or more families, each llving as an
independent housekeeping unit."
Section 17.08.240 defines a townhouse as:
"A building that has one family dwelling units erected in a
row or in a clustered fashion as a single bulldlng on
adjoining lots, each being separate from the adjoining unit
or units by a party wall or walls extending from the
basement floor to the roof along the dividing lot line, and
each such building being separate lrom any other building
by space on all sides.'
Glearly, the Texas Townhomes building meets the definition ot a townhouse
building and is therefore considered to be a multi-family building, as it relates to
determination ol the unit type category described in the additional 250 section of
the code."
Statf Response
For the reasons stated in the May 13, 1994 letter, staff believes that the Texas Townhomes
clearly meet the definition of a townhouse and is therefore considered to be a multi{amily
building, as it relates to the determination ol unit type category described in the additional 250
section of the Code.
Paraoraph #5 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"As you know, in order to apply for a 250, evidence must be provided that
the unit or units have received a final Certificate ol Occupancy. During
our last meeting, you requested that statf review the Town files to
determine whether or not a linal Certificate of Occupancy has ever been
granted for Units 8A or 88 at the Texas Townhomes. Statf is unable to
locate any record ol a final Certificate of Occupancy being issued tor
either of the uhits. Therefore, in order to proceed with your 250
application, you must request that the building department perform a tinal
Certiflcate of Occupancy inspection on the Thain units and provide a copy
of the certificates to the planning statf." 1l
,..,..-:'- :
...,5
Staff Response
Staff requested that the applicant provide eith/er a copy of their final Certificate of Occupancy
for the Texas Townhomes or reguest a final inspection of the units from the Building
Department. Since writing the May 13, 1994 letter, statf has consulted with Gary Murrain
(Town of Vail Chief Building Official) regarding the possibility of performing a final Certificate
of Occupancy inspection on the Thain units. Gary determined that since these units were built
so long ago (in Eagle County) and it is unclear under which code the units were constructed,
he would not be,able to perform a final Certificate of Occupancy on these units.
Paraqraph #5 from the Mav 13. 1gg4 letter:
"Also mentioned during our conversation on Wednesday, please provide a
copy of Association approval to temporarily remove the existing
landscape amenities (grass, rocks, etc.) currenily existing on the
Association property, located directly in front of Lots 8 and 9. Please
address how you intend to landscape this area after the construction on
your landscape plan."
Staff Resoonse
We do not believe that Jay Peterson has any objection to this paragraph.
c:\pec\memos\chatliel.S 1 3
esign Review Action I ,rm
TOWN OF VAIL
category rrrrrnu", 6 o^" 6r.r/t /q't
,,r"o*^"' -fAoi^ u4i{t (u*'i
----"-+
Buildins n^^"t -f € Xq S -Gcta L,er,-l,eS
Proiect Description:
-l-us62'
Owner, Address and Phone:gS AL /os
ArchitecVGontact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description:togllrXA*1 Block ...._ Subdivision
ProjectstreetAaaress: u[€3 E Go
Zone District HD/4 F
Ao
taff Action
Vote:I
esign Review Action I -rm
TOWN OF VAIL
_-7-*
Building N^ ., -I € Xq 5 --f&c,r.tt, frorvtes
catesory r.rrrn", 6 ,^" 6,/t/q q
"-i"o*^ "' TAa i ^ cs a i{ s (un-,i{s 4*8-\
Project Description:
-f"c,ttO'
6s aL R@,r '^q btwk f,/os
Architecvcontact, Address and Phone: L
/1liO tloX 5 /*
Legal Description: tot.94nx1 Block -.._ Subdivision zone District HD/14 F
Project Street Address:L(93 E G Cre
b":)
iop e(wc{.
t
F IL T COPY
TOT{/N OFVAIL
75 Sourlt Fronnge Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
3 03 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 3 9
FAX 303-479-2452
D e parr nt e nr of Conun un i ry D eve loprn e nt
May 13, 1994
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, GO 81658
RE: Proposed remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 8B and g, Texas Townhomes, Vail
Village 4th Filing.
Dear Lynn:
This lelter is inlended lo document the discussion which took place during our meeting
yesterday, Wednesday May 11, 1994, concerning the above-referenced remodel. I hope this
letter will be helpful in clarifying many of the issues raised by yourself, the Thain's legal
counsel, and Jay Peterson, counsel for Helen Chatfield. I have broken out each of the major
issues related to the proposed Thain residence remodel and have listed them as follows:
1. The Thain property is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is nonconforming
with'regard to minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. lt is considered to be a
legally nonconforming building. Staff agrees with your interpretation of the
nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code which would allow the Thains
to remove a substantial portlon of the building and build an entirely new building
provided the existing nonconformity is not increased. As you have discussed
previously with Mike Mollica,
proposed stairs on the rear of the
, as presenled at conceptual Design Review Board (DRB) review, would
The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes two additional 250
square loot applications. Section 18.71.030 H (Additional Gross Residential
Floor Area) states that any dwelling unjt in a multi-family dwelling shall be
eligible for additional GRFA not to exceed a maximum of 250 square feet in,
addition to lhe existing GRFA for the site provided that no exterior additions or
allerations to multi-family dwellings,
The Thains are proposing to
utilize two 250 ordinances for the two dwelling units within the existing shell of
the building and construct a basement when the new building is constructed.
Therefore, lhe GRFA attributed to the two 250's shall not alter the exterior of
the dwelling units. Since the 250 section of the Code does not allow for the
pooling of additional GRFA, il is imporlant that each 250 square {oot addition be
directly attributed lo each dwelling unit.
be considered a violation of the non-conforming section of the Code. Stalt
believes that lhe rear access to the basement must bE removed.
f
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Two
3. Statf does not believe that the building will become more noncohforming with
the addition of the proposed 250 applications. The 250 sectio4 of the Vail
Municipal Gode does allow for the addition of 250 square feet of GRFA per unit
in addition to the existing GFIFA on a property even il lhe existing GRFA on the
property already exceeds the allowable. This provision applies to all properties
throughout town and is not specific to the Thain residence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Additionally, staff agrees with your contention fhat the existing perimeter line of
the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity. Existing
and new GRFA (250 additions) may be rearranged within the shell of lhe
existing building, and underground, as long as the perimeler lines are not
exceeded. AEy above grade expansion of the building which would extend
beyond the perimeler line established by the existing building walls, or break
the plane ol the existing roof or chimney lines would require variances from the
nonconlorming and setback sections ol the Town Code. Below grade
expansions are permitled provided they do nol extend beyond the perimeter
lines established by lhe existing building footprint. Variances would be required
for below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building fooprint.
4. Statf does not agree with Jay Peterson's interpretation that lhe Thain units
should fall into the single family dwelling and two family dwelling category
described in Section 18.71.020 ol the Vail Municipal Code. We believe that the
Thain residence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelling criteria outlined in
Section 18.71.030. Section 18.04.090 of the Vail Municioal Code defines multi-
family dwellings as:
'A building containing three or more dwelling units, including
townhouses, rowhouses, apartments, and condominium units,
designed for or used by three or more families, each living as an
independent housekeeping unit.'
Section 17,08.240 delines a townhouse as:
"A building that has one family dwelling units erected in a row or
in a clustered fashion as a single building on adjoining lots, each
being separate from the adjoining unit or units by a party wall or
walls extending lrom the basement lloor to the roof along lhe
dividing lot line, and each such building being separate from any
other building by space on all sides.'
" .t
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Three
Clearly, the Texas Townhomes building meets the definition of a townhouse
building and is therefore considered to be a multi-family building, as it relates to
determination of the unit type category described in the additional 250 section
of the Code.
5. As you know, in order to apply for a 250, evidence must be provided that the
unit or units have received a final Certificate of Occupancy. During our last
meeting, you requested that staff review the Town files to determine whether or
not a final Certificate of Occupancy has ever been granted for Units 8A or 88 at
the Texas Townhomes. Slaff is unable to locate any record of a final Certificate
ol Occupancy being issued for either of the units. Therefore, in order to
proceed with your 250 application, you must request that the building
deparlment perform a final Certilicale of Occupancy inspection on the Thain
units and provide a copy of the certificates to the planning staff.
6. Also mentioned during our conversation on Wednesday, please provide a copy
of Association approval to lemporarily remove the existing landscape amenities
(grass, rocks, etc.) currently existing on the Association property, located
directly in front of Lots 8 and 9. Please address how you intend to landscape
this area atter the construction on your landscape plan.
I believe the above information accurately describes our conversation on Wednesday May 1 1,
1994. However, if you are not in agreement with any of the inlormation contained in this
letter, please contact me immediately to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,bM
Jim Gurnutte
Town Planner
xc: Tom Moorhead
Kristan PriE
Rick Rosen
Mark Smith
Mike Mollica
Jay Peterson
7.l
Banr-ev, f.Iannntvc & PnrpRSoN
A PRoFESSIoNAL CoRPoRATIoN
ATToRNEYSATI,Aw
LINCOLN CENTER
1O60 LINCOLN STREET. SUITE 3r75
DENVEN. COLORADO 80287
TELEPHONE (803) 83?.r860
FACSTMTLE (303) 88?-0097
Ylay 23, L994
Mr. Jim curnutte
Town of Vail Planner
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road West'
Vail, Colorado 81557
RE: Lot 8, The Rowhouses
Dear Jim:
VAIL NATIONAL BAI{K BLDG.
IO8 SOUTE FRONTAGE ROAD WEST: SUTTE
VAIL COLCTRADO 81657
TELEPHONE (S09) {?6.0092
FACSIITILE ( g0g) {7S-0{87
On instructions from Helen Chatfield, who is an adjacent property ownerof Lot 8, The Rowhouses, she hereby appeals the Staff interpretation ofall iterns set forth in your letter of May 13, L994 regarding the
expansion and alteration to Lot 8, The Rowhouses.
If you have any guestions please contact rne at ny office.
Sincerely,
terson
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tom Moorhead
Jim Curnutte {Z'
April 28, 1994
Texas Townhomes tear down/rebuild
Lynn Fritzlen has recently submitted an application to tear down two units (Units 8A and 88)
and rebuild a unit at the Texas Townhomes. This tear downirebuild includes two additional
250 square foot applications.
herefore,theapp|icantisproposingtouti|izethe
This property is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is nonconforming with regard to
minimum lot size, setbacks, etc. lt is considered to be a legally nonconforming building. Staff
has interpreted the nonconforming section of the Code such that the applicant may tear down
theexistingbui|dingandbui|danentire|ynewbui|ding%id
Tom, would you please review the attached documents and let me know whether you concur
that homeowner association approval is not required in conjunction with this proposed
remodel. Secondly, please give us your interpretation on whether or not you agree that the
applicant may tear down an existing slructure, build a new building, and utilize two 250 square
foot additions provided the mass and bulk of the new building exactly matches the previous
structure,
Late breaking news...Jay Peterson, representing Diana Donovan, who owns the adjacent
property, just walked in with a copy of a party wall agreement between Units 7 and 8. He
contends that this application cannot proceed further without Diana's permission. However,
on Page 2, if says that the party wall may not be "altered, removed or destroyed." What if the
applicant claims that the wall will not be altered, removed or destroyed? Please advise.
500 additional square feet as a new basement when the new building is constructed. f
Alexander MacCormick
160 East 72nd Street
New York, NY,l 0021-4634
5/5/94
Dear Diana,
Many thanks for your letter of April 19th,1994. This reached me in
Europe so I have just now been able to reply.( returned home to NY May
4th.)
I am not in favor of any alteration to the outside of the Texas
Townhouses. I thought that this was not allowed by the rules of our +-
Association unless there was common consent. Pete Perry put this in
didn't he ? lt is also my understanding that any alteration to the backside,
ie the side facing the river,was covered by this ruling but alterations here
would normally be allowed.
Can Rike Wooten check this?We could even call Pete Perry in Denver too .
I agree with you that inconvenience to the other unit holders should be
kept to a minimum during a remodeling and that the original integrity of
the Texas Townhouse look should be maintained.
' !r.Thus, I think that the new owners must have been aware that they
would face restrictions.lt seems that they are asking for the moon . Lets
hope they cannot have it .
All the best for now and many thanks for keeping us informed.
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
October 14,2004
Mr. Mike Suman
Michael Suman Architect, LLC
PO Box 7760
Avon, CO 81620
Re: Design review application DR8040545
483 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, CO 81657
Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village 4'n Filing
Dear Mike,
Thank you for submitting an application for design review of a dormer and square footage addition at the above
residence. Per our conversations over the last couple of days, the application will require approval for a side
setback variance from the Planning and Environmental Commission in addition to approval from the Design
Review Board. The PEC approval is necessary due to the fact that the Texas Townhomes became legally non-
conforming in regard to the required side setbacks in the High Density Multiple Family district at the time that they
were zoned as such by the Town. Because the Townhomes are attached, none complies with the 20' setback
required in their district; so, oddly enough, nearly every addition of square footage has to be built in the setback!
The following sections of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Chapter 1 7, Variances, specify sections of the code which
are applicable to this variance request.
Sectlon 12-17-1 : PUEPOSE:
A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practicat difficulties and
unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives ot this title as would resuft from strict
or literal interpretation and enforcement, vaiances lrom certain regulations may be granted. A
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of
a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site
or in the immediate viciniU; or trom other physical limitaflons, street locations or conditions in the
immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant ot stict or literal compliance with a
regulation shall not be a rcason for granting a vaiance.
B. Development Standards Excepted: Vaiances may be granted only with respect to the development
standards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site dimensions, setbacks, distances
between buildings, height, density control, building bulk control, site coverage, usable open space,
landscaping and site development, and parking and loading requirements; or with respect to the
provisions of chapter 11 of this title, governing physical development on a site.
C. Use Regulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend to the use regulations
prescribed tor each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid results inconsistent with the
objectives ot this title is provided by chapter 16, "Conditional Use Permits", and by section 12-3-7.
"Amendment'of this title. (Ord. 8(1973) I 19.100)
{p ^""r"ur rt""
*ct ion 1 2.1 7-2 : AP PUCAN ON NFO B MATIO N R EQUI R ED :
Application for a vaiance shall be made upon a form provided by the administrator. The application shall
be suppofted by documents, maps, plans, and other material containing the following information:
A. Name and address of the owner and/or applicant and a statement that the applicant, if not the owner,
has the permission of the owner to make application and act as agent for the owner.
B. Legal desciption, street address, and other identifying data coneming the site.
C. A statement ot the precise nature ol the variance requested, the regulation involved, and the practical
dilficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives ot this title that would
result from stict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specifid regulation.
D. A site plan showing ail existing and proposed features on the site, and on adjolning sites if necessary,
pertinent to the vaiance requested, including site boundaries, required setbacks, building locations
and heights, topography and physical features, and similar data.
E. Such additional material as the administrator may prescribe or the applicant may submit pertinent to
the application and to the findings prerequisite to the issuance of a variance as presqibed in section
12-17-6 of this chapter.
F. A list of the owner or owners of record of the properties adjacent to the subject property which is
subject of the hearing. Provided, however, notitication of owners within a condominium project shall
be satisfied by notifying the managing agent, or the registered agent of the @ndominium project, or
any member of the board of directors of a condominium association. The list of owners, managing
agent, registered agent or members of the board of directors, as appropriate, shall include the names
of the individuals, their mailing addresses, and the general desciption of the property owned or
managed by each. Accompanying the list shall be stamped, addressed envelopes to each individual
or agent to be notitied to be used for the mailing of the notice of hearing. lt will be the applicant's
responsibility to provide this information and stamped, addressed envelopes. Notie to the adjacent
property owners shall be mailed tirst class, postage prepaid.
G. ff the property is owned in @mmon (condominium association) or jointly with other propefty owners
such as diveways, NB parels or C parels in duplex subdivision, by way of example and not
limitation, the written approval ol the other propeny owner, owners or applicable owners' association
shall be required. This can be either in the form of a letter of approval or signature on the application.
(Ord.24(2000) $ 2: Ord.4e(1991) $ 2: Ord. 50(1978) $ 15: Ord.30(1978) $ 2: Ord. e(1973) S 19.200)
*ctlon 12-175: CRITER,A AND FINDINGS:
A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a variance application, the planning and environmental
commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance:
1. The relationship of the requested vaiance to other existing or potential uses and struclures in the
icinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and entorcement ol a specified
regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity,
or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special pivilege.
3. The elfect of the requested vaiance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and
traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance.
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the following tindings
before granting a variance:
l. That the granting of the vaiance will not constitute a grant of special privilege in@ngstent with the
limitations on other properties classified in the same distict.
2. That the granting of the vaiance will not be detimental to the public heafth, safety, or weltare, or
materially injuriousto properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variane is warnnted lor one or more of the following rcasons:
a. The strict or literat interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in
practial ditficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives ot this title.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary ciranmstances or coditions applicable to the site of the
vaiance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The stict or litenl interpretation and enforement of the specified regulation would deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distict. (Ord. 8(1973)
51e.N0)
As I mentioned, the public notice must be sent out prior to October 2f in order for the application to remain on
the Planning and Environmental Commission's November 8tn agenda. Therefore, please submit the PEC
appfication, complete with a letter addressing the criteria for a variance in Section 12-17-6, a check for the
appropriate amount,.and addressed and stamped envelopes for the adjacent property owners, by 5pm on
Monday, October 18'n. I will have the public notice dratted before I leave town lomorrow. At quick glance, the
adjacent property owners would include the managing agents of All Seasons, Vail Trails, and Manor Vail. For a
complete listing ot adiacenls, however, I would suggest that you contact Eagle County.
Additionally, please feel free to cgntact me before that time regarding any further questions or concerns you might
have.
Elisabeth Eckel
970.479.2454
D epartment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
')
October 27,2004
Mr. Mike Suman
Michael Suman Architect, LLC
PO Box 7760
Avon,CO 81620
Re: Design review application DR8040545
483 Gore Creek Drively'ail, CO 81657
Lols I and 9, Vail Village +'n Filing
Dear Mike,
Thank you for submitting a design review application for the above residence. However, as I was researching the
rire in pieparation ot draning ;;;morandum for the November 8th Planning and. Environmental Commission
meeting, i found that there isiurrentty no square footage remaining for the lot. ln June of 1994, the Design
n""iri:'eo"rd approved (2) 2S0 square fooi additions f-or Lots 8A and 88. From my research of the file' it
;tp"315ih;i Unit's en ani'eB r"rd owned by the Thain family in '1994 when the application was submitted.. The
;;iG;;r" completely torn do*n and rebuilt, using both 250 multi-family dwelling credits (as basement area) in
in" p.""i". Hbwev6r, the project was consistenily referenced as a'remodel" in order to maintain the non-
conformity of the residence.
I have attached a copy of the final DRB agenda from June 1, 1994 as well as a Planning and Environmental
commission memorandum dated shortty ihereafter, both of which are helpful in describing the order of events. lt
is unfortunate that these findings do not work in the favor of the current owners. However, I will do my best to
refund to you the application fees.
Please don't hesitate to let me know if I can be of further help'
FILE /.'//PY
enclosures
{p ^""r"uo rt*"
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission )
Community Development Department
June '13, 1994
An appeal of a staff decision regarding nonconforming structures,
demo/rebuilds, setbacks, and the use of the 250 Ordinance pertaining to the
Thain development proposal located at 483 Gore Creek Drive/Lots 8A, 8B, and
9, Texas Townhouses, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Appellant:
Planner:
Jay Peterson, representing Helen Chatfield
Jim Curnutte
I. INTRODUCTION
Jay Peterson, on behalf of Helen Chatfield, owner of Lot 7, Texas Townhomes, is appealing
all items set forth in the staff interpretation letter dated May 13, 1994 regarding a proposed
remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 88, and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing
(see attached copy). The Texas Townhomes are zoned High Density Multi-Family (HDMF).
The Thains own two units located at the easternmost end of the Texas Townhomes. The
Thains woulci like to tear down Units 8A and 88 and construct two new residences in their
place (keeping only the western and southern building foundation walls). Because of the way
the Texas Townhomes property has been subdivided, the existing building is considered to be
nonconforming with regard to minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. The Thains have
agreed that the new building would not increase the existing mass and bulk of the building.
Additionally, the Thains have applied to use two 250 additions in conjunction with the
proposed construction of the new building.
Since Mr. Peterson is appealing all items set forth in the staff letter dated May 13, 1994.
Each of the six paragraphs therein will be further discussed as follows:
Paraqraph #1 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"The Thain property is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is
nonconforming with regard to minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. It
is considered to be a legally nonconforming building. Staff agrees with
your interpretation of the nonconlorming section of the Vail Municipal
Gode which would allow the Thains to remove a substantial portion ol the
building and build an entirely new building provided the existing
nonconformity is not increased. As you have discussed previously with
Mike Mollica, the mass and bulk of the building (i.e. building tootprints,
height, setbacks, and GBFA - excluding the 250 Ordinance addition)
cannot be increased in any way. The proposed stairs on the rear of the
building, as presented at conceptual Design Review Board (DRB) review,
would be considered a violation of the non-conforming section of the
Code. Staff believes that the rear access to the basement must be
removed."
t
Staff Response
Section 18.64.010 (Purpose) of the nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code states
that:
"This chapter is intended to limit the number and extent of nonconforming uses
and structures by prohibiting or limiting their enlargement, their reestablishment
after abandonment, and their restoration after substantial destruction. While
permitting nonconforming uses, structures and improvements to continue, this
chapter is intended to limit enlargement, alteration, restoration, or replacement
which would increase the discrepancv between existinq conditions and the
development standards prescribed bv this title."
Additionally, Section 18.64.040 (Uses) states that:
"The use of the site or structure lawfully established prior to the effective date
of the ordinance codified in this title which does not conform to the use
regulations prescribed by this title for the district in which it is situated may be
continued, orovided that no such nonconformino use shall be enlarqed to
occupv the oreater site area or buildinq floor area than it occupied on the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter..."
Staff considered the following elements before determining that the Thains could substantially
remodel their unit:
The intent of the nonconformino section of the Code. - Generally,
nonconforming sections of zoning codes are created for the purpose of assuring
the eventual removal of noxious uses or activities that are not compatible with
surrounding uses. Staff believes that the Texas Townhomes' nonconformity
was created as a result of the method used to subdivide the property and we
would not consider the entire building to be the type of nonconforming use
which should eventually be removed from the property. In light of the fact that
the staff believes that the Town is not attempting to require the eventual
removal of the entire building lrom the property, and due to the fact that the
Town does encourage the upgrade of older buildings throughout town, staff has
looked at the proposed remodel of the Thain residence as something that would
be of benefit to the Town provided the new building did not increase the
discrepancy between the existing conditions and the development standards
established by the property's zoning. Since the applicant has agreed that the
building's mass and bulk (i.e. building footprint heights, setbacks, GRFA, etc.)
would not be increased in any way as a result of the remodel, the staff has no
objection to the proposed tear down/rebuild.
Can an aoplicant voluntarilv tear down a nonconforminq structure and build a
new structure as lono as the nonconformitv is not increased? - Section
18.64.060 (Maintenance and Repairs) states that:
A.
B.
"Nonconforming uses, structures, and site improvements may be
maintained and repaired as necessary for convenient, safe, and
efficient operation of the use, provided that the maintenance and
repair does not increase the discrepancy between the use,
structure, or site improvement and the development standard
prescribed in the Town Code."
Section 18.64.090 (Restoration) states that:
"Whenever a nonconforming use which does not conform
with the regulations of the district in which it is located or
a nonconforming structure or site improvement which
does not conform with the requirements for setbacks,
height, density control, building bulk control, or site
coverags is destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of
God, or by the public enemy, its use may be resumed or
the structure may be restored, provided the restoration is
commenced within one year and diligently pursued to
completion."
Although the above paragraph does not include reference to the voluntary
removal of a nonconlorming building, it does seem clear that a nonconforming
use or structure may be restored within one year after its demolition.
C. Comolete or substantial removal. - The Town has previously determined that a
tear down/rebuild is the "ultimate remodel". Because of this determination and
the fact that two of the building's foundation walls will remain, staff believes that
this application should be considered a substantial remodel of an existing
building rather than a complete removal of a non-conforming structure.
Paraoraph #2 lrom the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes two additional 250
square foot applications. Section 18.71.030 H (Additional Gross
Residential Floor Area) states that any dwelling unit in a multi-family
dwelling shall be eligible tor additional GRFA not to exceed a maximum of
250 square feet in addition to the existing GRFA for the site provided that
no exteraor additions or alterations to multi-family dwellings, with the
exoeption of window skylights or other similar modifications, shall be
allowed. The Thains are proposing to utilize two 250 ordinances for the
two dwelling unats within the existing shell of the building and construct a
basement when the new building is constructed. Therefore, the GRFA
attributed to the two 250's shall not alter the exterior of the dwelling units.
Since the 250 section of the Code does not allow for the pooling of
additional GRFA, it is important that each 250 square foot addition be
directly attributed to each dwelling unlt."
Staff Response
Since the Thain units (Units 8A and/8B) have been in existence for more than five years, they
are entitled to apply for two additional 250 square foot additions. Because these units are
located within a multi-family building, the proposed 250's shall not result in any exterior
additions or alterations to the building, with the exception of windows, skylights, or other
similar modifications. Additionally, the 250 Ordinance does not allow for the pooling of
additional GRFA, therefore, each of the 250's must be directly attributed to the existing
dwelling units.
Paraqraph #3 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"Staff does not believe that the building will become more nonconforming with
the addition of the proposed 250 applications. The 250 section of the Vail
Municipal Code does allow for the addition of 250 square feet ol GRFA per unit
in addition to the existing GRFA on a property even if the existing GRFA on the
property already exceeds the allowable. This provision applies to all properties
throughout town and is not specific to the Thain residence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Additionally, staff agregs with your contention that the existing perimeter line of
the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity. Existing
and new GRFA (250 actditions) may be rearranged within the shell of the existing
building, and underground, as long as the perimeter lines are not exceeded. Anv
above or below grade expansion of the building which would extend beyond the
perimeter line established by the existing building walls, or break the plane of
the existing roof or chimney lines would require variances from the
nonconforming and setback sections of the Town Code. Below grade
expansions are permitted provided they do not extend beyond the perimeter
lines established by the existing building footprint. Variances would be required
for below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building footprint."
Staff Response
Staff does not believe that the existing building will become more nonconforming as a result of
the 250 additions because the existing mass and bulk of the building will be unaffected. Also,
there would not be any increase in the discrepancy between the existing conditions and the
development standards allowed in the HDMF zone district.
With regard to the setback nonconformity, staff has made the interpretation that the existing
perimeter line of the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity.
Existing and new GRFA may be rearranged within the shell of the existing building, and
underground, as long as the perimeter lines are not exceeded. Staff believes that any above
grade or below grade expansion which would break the plane of the existing nonconformity
would require variances from the Town Code.
Paraoraph #4 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"Staff does not agree with Jay Peterson's interpretation that the Thaln units
should fall into the single tamily dwelling and two family dwelling category
described in Section 18.71.O2O of the Vail Municipal Code. We believe that the
Thain residence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelling criteria outlined in
Section 18.71.030. Section 18.04.090 of the Vail Municipal Code defines multi-
family dwellings as:
"A building containing three or more dwelling units, including
townhouses, rowhouses, apartments, and condominium units,
designed tor or used by three or more families, each living as an
independent housekeeping unit."
Section 17.08.240 defines a townhouse as:
"A building that has one family dwelling units erected in a
row or in a clustered tashion as a single building on
adjoining lots, each being separate from the adioining unit
or units by a party wall or walls extending from the
basement lloor to the roof along the dividing lot line, and
each such building being separate from any other building
by space on all sides."
Clearly, the Texas Townhomes building meets the definition of a townhouse
building and is therefore considered to be a multi-family building, as it relates to
determination ot the unit type category described in the additional 250 section of
the Gode."
Staff Response
For the reasons stated in the May 13, 1994 letter, staff believes that the Texas Townhomes
clearly meet the definition of a townhouse and is therefore considered to be a multi{amily
building, as it relates to the determination of unit type category described in the additional 250
section ol the Code.
Paraoraph #5 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"As you know, in order to apply for a 250, evidence must be provided that
the unit or units have received a linal Certiticate of Occupancy. During
our last meeting, you requested that staff review the Town files to
determine whether or not a final Certificate of Occupancy has ever been
granted for Units 8A or 88 at the Texas Townhomes. Staff is unable to
locate any record of a final Certiflcate of Occupancy being issued for
either of the units. Therefore, in order to proceed with your 250
application, you must request that the building department perlorm a final
Certificate of Occupancy inspection on the Thain units and provide a copy
of the certificates to the planning staff."
Staff Response
Staff requested that the applicant provide either a copy of their final Certificate of Occupancy
for the Texas Townhomes or request a final inspection of the units from the Building
Department. Since writing the May 13, 1994 letter, staff has consulted with Gary Murrain
(Town of Vail Chief Building Official) regarding the possibility of performing a tinal Certificate
of Occupancy inspection on the Thain units. Gary determined that since these units were built
so long ago (in Eagle County) and it is unclear under which code the units were constructed,
he would not be Able to perform a final Certificate of Occupancy on these units.
Paragraph #6 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"Also mentioned during our conversation on Weclnesday, please provide a
copy of Association approval to temporarily remove the existing
landscape amenities (grass, rocks, etc.) currently existing on the
Association property, located directly in front of Lots 8 and 9. Please
address how you intend to landscape this area after the construction on
your landscape plan."
Staff Resoonse
We do not believe that Jay Peterson has any objection to this paragraph.
c:\psc\memos\ch stlie 1.6 I 3
6'
FILT OilPY
75 Sourh Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 8ji657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
Department of Connuniry Developnent
May 13, 1994
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Proposed remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 88 and g, Texas Townhomes, Vail
Village 4th Filing.
Dear Lynn:
This letler is intended lo document the discussion which took place during our meeting
yesterday, Wednesday May 11, 1994, concerning the above-referenced remodel. I hope this
letter will be helpful in clarifying many of the issues raised by yourself, the Thain's legal
counsel, and Jay Peterson, counsel for Helen Chatfield. I have broken out each of the major
issues related to the proposed Thain residence remodel and have listed them as follows:
1. The Thain property is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is nonconforming
with'regard lo minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. lt is considered to be a
legally nonconforming building. Stalf agrees with your interpretation of the
nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code which would allow the Thains
to remove a substantial portion of the building and build an entirely new building
provided the existing nonconformity is not increased. As you have discussed
previously with Mike Mollica, the mass and bulk of the building (i.e. building
footprints, height, setbacks, and GRFA - excluding the 250 Ordinance addition)
cannot be increased in any way. The proposed stairs on the rear of the
building, as presenled at conceptual Design Beview Board (DRB) review, would
be considered a violation of the non-conforming section of the Code. Staft
believes that the rear access to the basement must be removed.
2. The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes two additional 250
square foot applications. Section 18.71.030 H (Additional Gross Flesidential
Floor Area) slates that any dwelling unit in a multi-family drvelling shall be
eligible for additional GRFA not to exceed a maximum of 250 square leet in
addition to the existing GRFA for the site provided that no exlerior additions or
alterations to multi-family dwellings, with the exception of window skylights or
other similar modifications, shall be allowed. The Thains are proposing to
utilize two 250 ordinances for the two dwelling units wilhin the existing shell ol
the building and construct a basement when the new building is constructed.
Therefore, the GRFA altributed to the two 250's shall not alter the exterior of
the dwelling units. Since lhe 250 section of the Code does not allow lor the
pooling of additional GRFA, it is imporlant that each 250 square foot addition be
directly anributed to each dwelling unit.
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Two
3.Staff does not believe that the building will become more nonconforming with
the addition of the proposed 250 applications. The 250 section of the Vail
Municipal Code does allow for the addition of 250 square feet of GRFA per unit
in addition to the existing GRFA on a property even il the existing GRFA on the
property already exceeds the allowable. This provision applies to all properties
throughout town and is not specific io the Thain residence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Additionally, slaff agrees with your contention that the existing perimeter line of
the building eslablishes the legal exlent of the setback nonconformity. Existing
and new GRFA (250 additions) may be rearranged within the shell ol the
existing building, and underground, as long as the perimeter lines are not
exceeded. Anv above grade expansion of the building which would extend
beyond the perimeter line established by the existing building walls, or break
the plane of the existing roof or chimney lines would require variances from the
nonconforming and setback sections of the Town Code. Below grade
expansions are permitted provided they do not extend beyond the perimeter
lines established by the existing building footprint. Variances would be required
lor below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building fooPrint.
Statf does not agree with Jay Peterson's interpretation that the Thain units
should fall into the single family dwelling and two family dwelling category
described in Section 18.71.020 of the Vail Municipal Code. We believe that the
Thain residence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelling criteria outlined in
Section 18.71.030. Section 18.04.090 of the Vail Municipal Code defines multi-
family dwellings as:
'A building containing three or more dwelling units, including
townhouses, rowhouses, apartmenls, and condominium units,
designed for or used by three or more families, each living as an
independent housekeeping unit.'
Section 17.08.240 defines a townhouse as:
"A building that has one family dwelling units erected in a row or
in a cluslered fashion as a single building on adjoining lots, each
being separate from the adjoining unit or units by a party wall or
walls exlending from the basement floor to lhe roof along the
dividing lot line, and each such building being separate from any
other buibing by space on all sides.'
4.
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Three
Clearly, the Texas Townhomes building meets lhe definition of a townhouse
building and is therefore considered to be a multi-family building, as it relates to
determination of the unit type category described in the additional 250 section
of the Code.
5. As you know, in order to apply for a 250, evidence must be provided that the
unit or units have received a final Certificate of Occupancy. During our last
meeting, you requested that staff review the Town liles to determine whether or
not a final Certificate of Occupancy has ever been granted for Units 8A or 8B at
the Texas Townhomes. Staff is unable to locate any record of a linal Cenificate
of Occupancy being issued for either of the units. Therefore, in order to
proceed with your 250 application, you must request that the building
department perform a final Certificate of Occupancy inspection on the Thain
units and provide a copy of the certificates to the planning statf-
6. Also mentioned during our conversation on Wednesday, please provide a copy
of Association approval to temporarily remove the existing landscape amenities
(grass, rocks, etc.) currently existing on the Association property, located
directly in lront of Lots 8 and 9. Please address how you intend to landscape
this area after the construction on your landscape plan.
I believe the above information accurately describes our conversation on Wednesday May 1 1,
1994. However, if you are not in agreemenl with any of the information contained in this
letter, please contact me immediately to discuss this matter turther.
Sincerely,l' - ,/+.,l|ttb", ( nz,^-tt-Lal/[.-
Jim Curnutte
Town Planner
xc: Tom Moorhead
Kristan PriE,
Rick Rosen
Mark Smith
Mike Mollica
Jay Peterson
BAILEY, HARRN{G & PETERSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPONATION
ATTORNEYSATLA1V
LINCOLN CENTER
I660 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 3T75
DENVER. COLORADO 8026,I
TELEPHONE (303) 837-1660
FACSIMILE (903) 837-0097
VAIL NATIONAL BANK BLDG.
108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST, SUITE
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
TELEPHONE (303) 476-0092
FACSIIITLE (903) 470-040?
May 23, L994
Mr. Jirn Curnutte
Town of Vail Planner
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road West
vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Lot 8, The Rowhouses
Dear Jirn:
On instructions from Helen Chatfield, who is an adjacent property owner
of Lot 8, The Rowhouses, she hereby appeals the Staff interpreta.tion of
a1I items set forth in your letter of May !3, L994 regarding the
expansion and alteration to Lot 8, The Rowhouses.
If you have any questions please contact me at rny office.
Sincerely,
terson
iii. : 75 soath Frontage RoadVaiI, Colorado gI657 Deparunent of Connnuniry Deve loptnertt'r?iffi;;'ri;n-"'o
October 2\,lgg4 . :
Mrs. Diana Donovan
.1O14 Homestake Circlevait, co 91657
RE: Response to retter regarding the Thain and cornice Building redeveropments
Dear Diana:
' As rhe pranner wno.
!3nolgo borh of ,n" ,..:Il:rT:nr proje*s refe'e^d to in your retrer datedoctober 13, 1ss4 ro-theptannin; il'i;;""mentat cdr;i;;;iiru;, oesisn Review
"'",?'i J3f f,H,3k "il1li|;
ffi ;H, ;'il5ug n' w; ;d ;* ;;;' i;" re in respons e to so me
As you know, the Thain remoder was reviewed.by the DRB on May 4,May 1g, and June 1.
1ee4' rhe June 1st DRB "pp';";i;;;;"i#j ,x ".^iil;;r."';;; ilirr inrormarion, I haveenctosed a coov of a.tetter m.t *r. *liir"n? rynn riiai"n. ,n" ril"i"r, archtect, whichdetails rhe DRB conditio"; ;i;;;"";."xr' io, can see, condition ! of the DRB approvalstates that "anv rrees.Esnruos 6n-ol*j".Jn, ,o t rprJp"nv fi;i'; as a resurt of theconstruction of the Thain residences, ;;',rt ; repraced with rike species and size".
once a consrruction
?'ulTj ir. issued for a project, the pranning slaff reries on the buirdinoinspectors to ensure in-at *re qrirJ'g ''.'oling
.on.tructed perlne approved constructionfl?1lii,l;ff;,1,j,ff',ill#ruy,tfff:ffiu"tion sr"!in! pr"n
"i?"nv orher eremenrs or
gli{iHldill':? ffi ilf:'.1"?L::',i3#"{"}-'e?1: slarr did poinr out that
' had come torh a in res i d e n "" io |
"
o n. r,, c ri:'' ; ;6;:, il q i":iqi iry:.,!!T il[":i"j1,I]l[jlTappticant that rhe staoing or equipm6nt;" ;;". ra;d is n;iil;#ki ancr was not shown onffi '1ifJiHilh:'+';:Gi#
-;;i il; ll:::
r rr,' usins pu6ric pioperty ror rhe*itn tn" "pp.;ff.;#f"
resictences' lwill relay yorrcrr"niion.o,i, regarding compriance
I're,:;i;6""#il:ft #,,:fi ii,$Til+lt_{,TVxilrg::itfr :tffJ^;lJ";f#:JJ the approved constiuction G;r;s-pr"" is not oeinf Li,iJrJ,, construction stasins
wilh regard ro your
"orl-":t..:?ncerning the appricant,s two ,,250 additions,,, you are correcttn lhat Units 8A and 88 have increar"oin ,LJrv s99 souaie re.r.-lio'*"u"r, the appricantwas able to show *'"t
"a"r' zso-r'iJr;rrrir,'t ;n;iqutaore-r-o-erci-oi ti'Jir"uiousrv existinsowetting units. Arso k":p]n mind lhat
'"."i."'ini. ouiroing ;I; I',"g-.inon"onforminglli;1'"i'J,itriT:ffi ,f;tf,,ruS:["."?1il:ft il5,gffi i:;$'i'f :ilchansetothrmass
r,rlf.,a.F .., f
october 25, 1994
Page Two
the apProved Plans'
As vou know, the Cornice Bui|ding specia| Deve|opment District SPg) 1:""iu"d extensive
review by the pEC and rown corlncit oefore uttimltely receiving.DRB approval. At this time'
staff has no reason to o"ri"u" in"t tn" Cornice Building is not being constructed according to
I hope the above information clarifies some ol the issues which you raised regarding the two
projects. I witt discuss yori i"lt"t with Gary Murrain and request that the building inspectors
keep close tabs on the construction of these two proiects to ensure that the approved building
p.i,iii.on.iir"tion drawings, and a1 conditions oi approval, are being followed'
questions or commenls regarding these projects in the
directly at 479-2138.
lf you should
luture, Please
SincerelY,
have anY additional
feel free to call me
/'*^Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
xc: Mike Mollica
Planning and Environmental Commission
Design Review Board
Town Council
Gary Murrain/Building lnspectors
ACTION FORM
Deparbnent of Community Development
75 Sorrth Frontage Road, Vail, @lorado 81657
td : 97 0.479,2L39 fax: 97 0.479.2452
web: w,ryw.ci,vail.co. us
ProjectName: LIGHTHALLVARIANCE PECNumber: PEC040072
Project Description:
NEW ROOF DORMER AND 138.s SQFT USING 2s0 ORDINANCE
Pafticipants:
OWNER LIGHTHALL,DIANEGAMEL t01L812004 Phone:303-985-{984
5293 W OBERUN DR
DENVER
co 80235
License:
APPLICANT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCHIECT, LLCLOI t812004 Phonet 97047 1-5122
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7760
AVON
co 81520
License:
ARCHffiCT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCHITECT, LLC10/18/2004 Phone: 970-47L-6L22
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7760
AVON
co 81620
License: C000001764
ProjectAddress: 483 GORE CREEK DRVAIL
483 GORE CREEK D& UNIT #8
Legal Description: Lot: 9 Block Subdivision: VAIL VILI-AGE FILING 4
Parcel Number: 210108235001
Comments:
Planning and Environmental Commission
locaUon:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: WITHDRWN
Second By:
vote: DateofApproval:
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Planner: ElisabethEckel PEC Fee Paid: $500.00
16:25 36398866941l1
Surah fiFGh I gecc
LIGHTI-AL
9?0-479-?Sl I
PAtr €I
p."
frco
laoolotmfrno
tEo
Appllcatlon lor Revlew by the
Plennlng and Envlronmenlal Gommlsslon
ItFtrsttl 0t otrr irru o.!bgt||.d
75 so|,| ftnEF nd. rrn, 6b.fb ttFT
H: 9lO4?021I h: glD.im-aao2
rUrf.vrlelrqn
Gaarr|l |trlbr rllon:
A| ptlFcr qdilt Fhrnhg fd srlrqil|rilc 6!|d*n |e,ir ||lt trtF rpcod rril S lldhg r
uIrI n rn oan. u trronr rlmr', |:lrtrrr- b.lE trluF +Ft'.11:-tcG.ln-iAct trfttft rrr Efllttntniffitrrm nlir cru bEF'rtr rl rrr|rrt #=ren
iltrtd t h"'ond;lty f*on11t 6prrtnr* TL pmld .tr.t rb ng6 to !. 1;vn by 0r Tosr
Or'rd .nLhr ilF qrbn ia,h BEd
?tD. ot ADdlodo|t rnd Fro:
. bnirE
IaiqrAtHtib.tn[ra/EHbrg!r|'t!tP||
llDrArr.ttuttS rnSDo
IrFr$rd l)ta!|oFrrinaDbtE
IttbrArrrdtrr| 5 nSithAn:rinirt5rrttD($.ffittnffiil,t
O;Gdridor ot tlr. ltsqu.{:
l-€don of t||. F|!DoI:
PhFlG.l&5.8r
Frrtel llo.:
;loai|!:
l|rne(rt of Orr|.(.l!
Ad6nfl:
Ownd.l Sl$.lurr(tl:
xr||| of Afptc.nc
Irlllltg Addnr*
51tOtr&
tccog
f1{xpsloofr?s
g{Grd!rffi
Fl6GOl*riefrc-dtrrEHrblblrbrr{orafialr#i(br.b|trilPbnl. arr b.
Zonrt CcllrlbrggnVdan
Co. AffiC gfGgatfi{O b'r P.rill tE )
RECEIVED
TOV-COM.DEV.
RCH!TEC'
Oclober 18,2@4
Lighfholl Residence Addition
Texos Townhomes Lots I & 9
Voil Villoge 4rh Filing
A{locent Properller llsl
WESI
Nome: Voll Trqlb Eorl
Zoning: High Density MullipleFomily
HOA Agent MonhollDiggs
Address: 3981 Soufh Dexfer Slreel
Englewood, CO 801l0
Phone: 1.303.753.0054
SOUTH
Nome:
Zoning:
HOA Agenf:
Address:
Nome:
Zoning:
EASI
Nome:
Zoning:
HOA Agent:
Address:
NORTH
Nome:
All Seorons
High Density Multiple.Fomily
Douglos West
100 Sonds Point Rood, #313
Longboof Key,FL3/'228
Aplllo Pork
Ouldoor Recreotion, Porking
MqnorVoll
High Density Mulliple-Fomily
Bob McCleory
595 Eost Voil Vqlley Drive
Voil. CO 81657
Gore Creek
michael@sumanarchitect.com
143 East Meadow Drive
suite 300
VaiL CO 81657
970.479.7sV2
f 970.479.751r
n 970.471.6122
+t+++++*'|t**+****ll|t***ltlaalattlaaa*ala*t**+*l*++t+f+'llla*l*****t*a*ttttrrrr*rrrrr***rtttit+
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO StateNnent
flf++**'| *'3******lt*1.**********'l'l'|t{r'}lr,llr:l'lrllr**t+***l't:} ****** *****'t* **'t*'l:l:i**tt$t*1r*** t'l *****+***
gtatement lllrmber: R040006916 Anourxt: $5Oo-OO LO/L8/2OO4O1:59 p!!
Palment lilethod: Cbeck Init: iIS
Notation: *1013/MICIIAEL,
ST'MAN
Permit No: P8e040072 Tlpe: PEC - Varialce
Parcel. No: 210108235001
Sit,e AddregE: 483 GORE CR.EEK DR ITAIIJ
IJocation: 1183 GORE CREBK DR, UNfT #8
Total FeeE: $500.00
rtie eayment: $500 - 00 Total AI!tr! thtg: $500.00
Balance: $0.00
ACCOI,JNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descript ion Current ms
PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES s00.00
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECTYOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE *m
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail on November 8, 2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration
of:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to
Section 12-1'l-4, NPDES, Section 12-11-6, Erosion Control, and Section 12-'14-'17, Setback from
Water-Course, Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant Town of VailPlanner: Bill Carlson
A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a residential addition to encroach into the required side setback, located at 483 Gore
Creek Drive (Texas Townhomes)/Lots I & 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing, and
setting lorth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Diane Lighthall, represented by Mike Suman Architect, LLCPlanner: Elisabeth Eckel
A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved
development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow
Bridge Road/Tracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: One Willow Bridge Road, represented by Resort Design, Inc.Planner: George Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
otfice hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call
(970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published, October 22,2004, in the Vail Daily.
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Itail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgoucom
December 19,2OO4
Mr. Mike Suman
Michael Suman Architect, LLC
PO Box 7760
Avon, CO 81620
Re: DRB040596, PEQ040077
483 Gore Creek Drively'ail, CO 81657
Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village 4tn Filing
Dear Mike,
Thank you for attending today's Planning and Environmental Commission meeting, where the PEC voted in favor
of the request{or a variance from the side setbacks at the above-referenced property. Additionally, I have staff
approved the Design Review Board application, as lhe DRB had instructed at its December 1$ meeting.
I have attached the approval forms which will be necessary for you to proceed with the building permit process.
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any remaining questions or concerns.
enclosures
f,,9t""*"t'o"rl1
vYqa4,l+ft6*-t'-''n"*'s+9,l
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of &mmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, oolorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: DRB Number: DRB040596
Project Description:' New dormer with standing seam copper roof to be added on the north side of the townhome,
resulting in no additional GRFA.
Participants:
OWNER UGHTHALL,DIANEGAMEL LUL5{ZOO4 Phone:303-985-4984
5293 W OBERUN DR
DENVER
co 8023s
License:
APPUCANT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCHITECT, LLCI 1/15/2004 Phone: 97 0-47 L-6I22
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7750
AVON
co 81620
License:
ARCHITECT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCHITECT, LLC11/15/2004 Phone: 97 O-47 t-6L22
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7750
AVON
co 81620
License: C000001764
Project Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Locationr
483 GORE CREEK DR, UNIT #8
Legal Description: lot: 8/9 Block: Subdivision: VAIL WLLAGE FIUNG 4
Parcel Number: . 210108235001
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: Date of Approvalz L2lL3l2OO4
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(P|AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PIAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building persgnnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.. Gond:202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date'l of final approval, unless a bulldlng permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligenUy pursued toward completion.
Ptanner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: f2SO.OO
t
I0t4/1\'#
Application for Design Review
Department of Cornmunity Derrelopment
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Cobnado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax:. 97O.479.262
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
All projecis requiring design re\riew must reiw appro\ral prior to submitting a building permit application. Ple*e
refer to the srbnittal requirernents for the partiarlar approval that b rcquGt€d. An application for Design Review
canrpt be accepted until all required information is receiwd by the Cornmuniv DevBlopment Departrnent. The
projec{ may also need to be reviewed by the Tourn Ccuncil and/or the Phnning and Erwironrrental @rnmission.
Dosign reyiew apprwal lapses unlsss a building permat as issued and construction commenc€s within
one year of the spproval.
Descrlption of the Request:
4a't
Locatlon of the Proposal: t-ot: 8l ? AOck:
Physlcal Address:
Parcet No.r 7lOl06L-:t50ol (ContactEagleCo.Ass€$sorat970-328-8640forparcelno.)
zonfns: H l-.' 'i'
Name(s) of Owner(s):
lfaflfng eaaress: 52
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Appllcant:
REC-EMFD
NOV i 5 2irt4
TOV.COM.DEV.
Phone:
lrlailing Address:
E.mail Address:
Type of Review and Fee:
. Signs. Conceptual Review
. New Oorstruclion. Addition
. llrrAbnlbn
(multi-family/commerchl)
. Minor Alteration
(singldamily/dudex)
. Changes to ApprovEd Pbrts
. Sepamtion R€eest
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650
$300
cr!250 \
$20
$20
No Fee
Fs construction of a new buiding or d€mo/rebuild-
For an addition where square footage is added to any r6id6ntial or
mrnrcrcbl building (irdudes 250 additions & interior conven*xs).
kr minor cfiangre b buildirBs and site impiordnents, such s,
reroofing, painting, window additions, bndscaping, ferrces and
r€taining walls, etc.
For minor clwqes to buiHirgs and site improvernenb, sudr a,
rermfing, painting, windol additions, hndscadng, fences and
retaining walb, etc.
For rwisiom to plans alredy approred by Planning S:taff or the
Design Review B@d.
For Offlce Uee Onlv:il;;,;,--eni": checkr,ro.: /0!_7 av,
Page 1 of I2lMl0'll$
t
****llt't******+*l*****ara**t**il'l'i***'l***r||*r****'l****+***{r*'l***'l*t*'llfiit'l*****+****a****ar****
TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Stat€ment
******l+**'l'l**t't*'l'lt***ttart*';f *ti****tt*tl****f ***l*'***'t't**'t'lttt*a*********t**{r****ta******'f tt
Statement lsuriber: R040007130 Anount; $250.0o LLltS/zOO4o3:25 Ptrt
Paltment Method: Check Init: ils
t{otation: *101?/l.lICHAEr,
ST'MAN ARCH
Pemit No: DR8040595 T!E)e: DRB-Uinor Alt, Cotun/mrlti
Parcel I[o: 210108235001
Sit€ AddreaB: 483 C'ORs CREER DR VAIIJ
Location: 483 CIORE CRBEK DR, IrNIT {f8
Total Pees: S250.00fhis Palment: $250.00 Total AIJr PmtE: $250.00Balance: $0.00
ACCOI,JNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current ffis
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI.I FEES 250 .00
SUMAN
ApcHtrtcl
LIGHTHATL
l:: .., i;-2
a
ii.';"1
RESIDENCE REMODEL
soulh side imooe
+.
I
I
i
r 0.'t 1 .04 TOV REVIEW
SU}'IANancHttcct
tIGHTHAtt RESIDENCE REMODET
north side imoges
l0.ll.o4 TOV REVIEW
ENCEtIGHTHAtt RESID REMODET
north context imoges
10.r 1.04 TOV REVIEW
sut{aNarcNttcc?
tIGHIHAtt RESIDENCE RE[,IODEt
siding ond window design exomple imoges
10.1t.04 IOV REVIEW
ffii,;slij
,', T,l'
j
l r' 1 .
RESIDENCE REMOOET
north context imoges
tIGHTHAIt
l0.ll.o4 IOV REVIEW
' "tltiERLitl:_ _. -_. _ - --\ Applp;:("'
oF l* --
reou P91 \<-rco YEAR FLgoD PLAIN
rs @ 8t68' PER F.E.M-A.
f-LOOO INSURANCE STUDY
FCR IHE TOW}j OF VAJL
a176.7'
(NOV. 2. r962)
j
/ '\-"t.N
\.) i
\o)
oo
o)
I
inunir
sEV€R I.IANHOLI
RIM EL[V. = 8'i80.6'
@ rNv. ELEV. = 8168.8
oi'
LANOSCAFINC,/OPEN(sEe 8c0K 6r0,
SPACE EASEMENT
PAGE 26s)
TS7
RENOVE '
RELOCATE TEI
EXISTINO TRASH ENCLOSI
OURING CONSTRUCTION.
-oT 7
MANOR VAIL
wooD
SIAIRS & 17
176,3'
at77,o'
(GFCUN0)
10 40'cc"
TRASH ENCLOSURE
"u'uilll;,.-
REEK\ DRIVE .Fg.Y.GORE
.
J\GREET€IN
FOR llfs FoRr, ?IO!{ OF rfiE
TEXAS rorJllHousE lssoclATlo)i
TIIIS lcREEyErf ls erecured €ffecr{ve thls 13t1 day of _jplil ,
198419&, by and eEong Che undrlstgned.
.\. tha undrrslSned ErG.rll of the ol"Trcr, ln f4e 6Jo?lc of tovnhorEe
unlis loaa:od Ln lhe ?exas fownhouaet, eltuatcd on ieJ: propclly locsted j
the:Dv:r of Vatl, Fag:c Count:r, Colorado, a,hlch paopclt:l ts tlore fully
dcscrlbed on Erhlblt A attsched her€to (h"r.l,nafter 'Texas Tor,nhoute!.).
.:. Thc o(,ncrs de€lE. to provl.de for c,!!!aln codron orlntenanc? lnd
sc!vlicd and for the acqulsltlon of ccEta!!: reEl pro-.rt7 loc..dd.dJsc"[t tq
chc:axes Totfihouses to l€ used f,oE autoDoblla Durkl,ng for thc Orne"8 (th!
"Coir:on ReaL Property").
.?. In co-juncrlon thcreul.th,. tr|c Ol1rcrs, chlle dcdlcated to the Gptrir
o: lr:lJvlCuiL or.trershlp snd tlrdcpendencc rerrectl.ng thelr otn unltr shlch hs6
Sccn .t trgdltLgn of lhc tenas Tolrnhorrder !Lnc. thclt ldceptton, vtsh to €attcr
Ln:o ihle .r€rccolnt for th€ expreas sltd lilt,ted purpose o! 6ana!,lng ccrtatn
clos{ly deflnod furcLlons for lhe Areoclattbn ,rt,th i'filch !o beneftt dl
o.rners on a unlfora arrC dutual besl!.
TIIEP.EFoRE, rhc Jeners agree ae folloec I
I . Dcf rirl tlons
A. 'ArtlcleE of ltrccrporsltot. ueanr ihe artlchr bf trrcorparr-
tlcn of lhc Assoclo llon.
B. 'Assoclallon- uears ths Tcxag tovr.ioule Areoclitlon, a
colo.ado cor?orstlon, not for proflt, It. ,ncclssora.and aaeignr, the oe[bers
of ehtch ,hall be sll Che Oeoe of the Texar ToDnhoue.q.
C. "Eoord of lta!sge!!" or .Boatd" leenr the govcttrlng body o! .hc
,!ssoc lJ tlcn,
D. "Bykss- BcanJ. Lhc tyt.a"s of lha lssoclltlon.
. E. 'col|!on Expentas- cernl nnd lnalude! ell_st!!6 aarcrscd. agbLnrt
th! c'rners by !h! Assoctatlon. for expsnrc! .uthorlzad by tht3 &rcrLeo! ..
folloes: (l) expcnacs ol edElBlstratlon, (i) cerlaln ealntrnsnce and irurl,r
?97 a97
-* Aat
;;--egq
J0qtt!Ei' i t'.lll.LlPl.
C,ICLE i' Fatr;''r''
'i.:v Jl 2 ?2 P}{'8{
i,.:
expe"ses ae herel,naft€r deflned; erd (3) cxpcnees incurred lrr acqulrlng,
rlalnialnlng aod lnsurlng the Cotloon ltea1 ?iopercy.
F, "0ue6t' Deans any ageoe, edployee. tenen:, gtiest, licersec or
lnvlloe of En Olrner,
G. -l{.ana6ln6 A8ent".E.dns rhe p rson,.lf ;r':;-, caployed by the
Borrd co perforE the functlorts plovlded r:o! herc..it.
H. 'O!.ner" ueang the pergoq or pe:sons, n: l.arelnsfter deflned.
gtnLig a lolrnbouge ln the Texae lounhouses, or a conCo|trldlu! Iocsled ther€ltr,
ln fe. slrlple, slong r{{th the helrg, guccessors, .193lg'ls arid repreaen!rtlvcg
of sa!.d peroon or peraona.
I. "person" Eeans any tndlvtdusl, corporallon, perhefshlp, coo-
blnstlon, a36oclat1on, lruscec or aoy orher 1.gal. d,rriry.
J, "ReaI Prsperty" ocsns thaE real proFerty descrtbed on Exblbl:
A, a t rached he:eto.
K, "UnlE" gr "Townhouge Unlt" neans the fee ei,ople tntere6E gnd
tlt1e lrl and to one or llole of lhe 16 loe[house unlte localcd r'lthln rhc
?oxas Tolrohousec, lnc1ud1ng fee slElle oeuersh{p of lhe r.al propcrty thar.-
unde i,
2.. li::rat! RlBhrs :nd opllgat{ots qf th. Assoclattotr.
A. the Asaociatlon ls hereby appolnted attorney h Cac! foE : l't
tners, end each of theE, to carry out the ll lted purposea cf thl! AgEe€rte'lt
so a6 !o p€mit :hc Assoclatlon to fulflli al1 of lts dutlc! end obl!8.tlonr
h€reunder.
8.. ltc .{bsocl6tlon shall bc grgnted al1 poeers [ecesaary tO [aln-
telo and repalr the Coroon Re!1 Property! a.rd perfcro al1 th; dutler lequlred
of lt,
l. The Assoclatlcn.
A. Dutles. lhe AE. r.llatlon! thE.rugh the Board or r H.naglnt
Agent, shal1 perfor[ functlo', and hold or Eansge property ss pEovtCed Lq
lhis .\greeEe.rf so as to further the :elleitlve laterest of al1 of, thc Olltlels
ln the proJ.ct. It shsli hlvq thr aulhorlry BccessaEy or dertreble to
achleve such purposes.
B. Menbershlp.. Tbe Onoer of a Unlc shall euto|llttciil;r 6s , Elr
ber of the Assocl8tloa. Setd Deubernhlp ls dppurt€nant co thr Un!.t of Bal,d
Olrner entliled to the onne:shl.p of the neuberahlp for chat tnlt aod sh!I1
-2-
eutomarlc.l'l pass !.1, Eh fce shple tltle to lh. Utrlt. lf Ehe lec sl&Ple
tiElc ro :hc Unlt ls helcl by oore thrn one perfcn, each clFtennni {)I a Untt
shnll bc a ncober of che Agsgclatlor, excep! rhat'odci unlt shrl:. have'onc
voEc .1s (i.serlbed !n pdrigraph 3D belos.
C. Eoard of ilansBerg_. The affnl.s of lhe ,\tnrcirflrn rhall bc
$onaged l.l, a 8o!rd of Hendgers lhlch !ry, by rasolutlon, lel,!il.1tn any poltton
of lrs ailr.horlt.'r to a l{a[agcr of l{anaglng Agent for che .\e3rclitid.r, thele
shnll. no'i be le6i than tlrrc. nor 6ore th8n slx ocllbcrs ,,Jf the Eos rd of
Vrndgeis .rna tha leros of st least oo?-thlrd of guch 3oard shall crplre ellnrF
nlly.
D. VotlnB of Otflrers. Each ODlt shall be ertltled t( onc vote 1n
eald q!$cclatlcn shlch shall be catt by the otrnar, or ln proportlon of the
' osnershli' of . U[l! lf tnore than on€ ir€rsou osnr arl,d Unlc. A vote oay be
c.rst lti ; r6on or b:r proxy. Such proxy Eay be granted by an Oe.ner ln favor
of odly ;i:rothcr o.'rrer, a oenber of the loard of !&nagers or bt ssld Olfncr'e
arr(arict'rr nanaSe|lent agcnt, A prory shall .be fully et(ecrrted h l.,rlclng,
shoLL be sltoedsed, siall be vElld only for tbe perrtcolar Eeetlttg de8lgnlted
thereid rnd m$si b€ flled wlth :hc Secretory of lhe Associatlotr bGfoEe thc
appolnteC tloc of rl,c 6ee!tn8. tb. Dosrd o! Itanegerd E6y declde that votr,ng
of Che O1,Tlerg ehcll be by Eall lrlth re6pec! to aBy latter or to loy pa!-
il.cuhr -Lectlon of tleEber! of the Eoard of llao8gers or lrlEh recpect to
idop:Ion of any rroposcd anendment to thls Agre€nent or the Arttcleg of
Incorpor:cton or 8yLav6 of Bhe As$oclaclon, provlded that 30 days prlor
urltten iorlce of such dec!.slon has bee! dalLvered to a]'l Ownerr..
E, Eylaws snd Artlcles. Thc lrrrpores and porerr of the As6ocla-
E!.on and the rlghts and ob:,lgac:on8 t'lth rc.pect !o Onrcrt set forth r.lthln
ch16 Agr,lcoan: shall be fornollzed by gtcvlslotl8 of the Artlcles and Bylard8
of !h€ .r'\,ssocla!1on, houever, such Artlcie6 and. !y1se8 shsll 1n no eve!!! be
lncon5Lsrent utth the provieloos of thls Aireei[cnr.
F. Heetln8s. the annual Eeetl.nga of the Associatlon rhall be
held 'rlt:rln 120 deyr folloritng _ths.end of each c8lendar
''.ar.
Ar qach annoa1
tcetlng, neobers of the loard of l{rtrsger! ghall be electcd by bsllot of thc
otnrcrs lrr sccordance ylth the r-equlre[eBts of paragraph 3D h€reof. The
O{nlrs E3y alEo tr8ntec! such othar bu€1neg6 of. Ehe Assocllttotr lis tray
properl.v c.r[e ircfora.;hed. Itre 8o.rd of l6nagcr! 6sy clll ! apecLal leetlng:
of rhe Otrner8 upon lh€tr om EoElon o! upon prese[tatlon. !o thrn of e perl_
tlon stSnrd by a [ajorlty of lhc O.'lte!s, uo buslnccs shaLl be traRslctcd.!t
a tpecldl lleeclng cxc€pt aa scaCed ln llr€ nolice, uilesg b], conrcnt of 100?
cf lhe ohre:shlp lnteresla cithGr l'n persoa or by proxy, ollceg of annual
and gpectal Eesllngr shsll be ,lven by .the, Bcarj ej &ina8ers addree,red to the
tcglst€red eddregses of the O!'ncrs dt least jC d:1:j:, prlor to the date sat for
such Deell!8. y'lly guch notlce shall rtnte lhc dntrl, tl-dc .md Flace.of th€
l.l.esing, ard 1l gh€ Ecctl:rg :,.s a apeeLal odellnAr thc prrpor€, lhgredf.
?alge! of ootics, elthe! ltt 1cison or by pr.1yy, ;rn.l slgn€d c..!her b'foie, at
or €ftdr sny Bcotlng, ghall !e a velld substit,rte for 3ctvlci.
4.. AsBoc.lsttqn luncttoE. The A6soclsttcr,r functlonB dre!
A. To provlde snoL. rercy{1 frain the walkusys, pa:ktng sre.s sid
CorEofl Redl proper ty,
B. To Frovlde trash rcooval froi0 ,l cencral locstion chosm by th€
.lagocla I Ion.
C. to provldc &al.tri€nance of the psrklng are! Eod CcrEoc Real
Prop€rty.
D. lo allocsce parklug.spaces ln th: Co@on R4al piop4rty ln such
^ Eenner elr to lnalrr? petlty qnd equal treaLren! of ell Omers.
E. .To eoploy, lf necaasary, o Vanagln3 AE€nE co carry aut
,'rsaoclatlon func tlong.
f. To [egotlate and pulchsse the Co@on tsal ?roperty (subject :o
ihe t l,nlt€tiona dcscFlbed Ln paragraph 15 hereof).
C. To asselE thc Orrners for the coscs of ar: fd4cllons of rhe
l-ssoctiElon, provlded thet ouch cgsts ar! kep! :o an absol lte dt1lnrll[ co,:rld_
e.ine :he resonable requl.;e6eots of the As,roclation.
t:. To furnlsh to each Olrnerr.at lre3t 30 dly3 pr;or !o each ,n_
nual neeftng of the Assoc!.atlon, a copy of the propoeed dnr.ual budget for the
next enaqlog fllcal Derlod,
5. pro?erty of thc -{ssoclation. lir Asloclatlon ,uly lny for, acgulr!
aid hold the Co@on RlaI property. SubJrct to tle rq16s anc reguletlolg of
the AasoclaElon, csc,h Osner and each Ownlrrg fallly and guesra aa]' u3e sueh
c.laon Real lroperty. upon dtsaolutlou of the Ageocratron, tf .,rer, esch .
o,"roer shall, be dceoed !o ovn an undl,vlded onFelxteerth lnteregc in eoy luch
Cc@on Real pEoparty aa lenantg t-o coEro!.
6, Asseespent for Copoon Exlenses, All Ounors sh6ll be obllga(ed to
pay the sssessoeuts tilposed by the ?o3:d of y:lnagets of, the Assoctetlon to
l|reet Che Cot'oon ExpOnscg. T:lf Asi{rjc:.len!E strlI.bl. iade pro rdtn accsrdlnS
lo the lt6ttn8 of each Olr:rer'o pe:-.4i1tagj. :-: .y.ei as Cona,tlned on Erhiblt g,
attachcd hlreto, Asscsrn.: (r :or lhe a.;.r..- .:;;rt.ilie!r shall be due gua!!erly,
ln adv€nce, on the flrsr ddy of chc liorrt.i, r.,:;11||nlng cach quart.r. The Venag_
tng Agenf or Bodrd of ynofigcrs shnli ii.na.-. n d delh,er or !-.11 to edch
Ovner an lte.ntzed annual state:r'ni s:.o.-lrrg !::e ve:ioug cs!lo,!ted or actual
erpenge6 for vhlch thc d.ssess.anls e..! irzea. rioatr{butIon' shalL ba-proraicd
tf the ovoersh.l.p of the Unli cotrlences on a doy och$ thaa rhe ftrst day of a
qu6rterly pertod. Thc aFscBq'ledts $ade f.'l CoElon Exp€nseg 3h.ll, be based
upon ihe cash lec.-rireDents dceaad !o be chc aggrlsate as the BoeEd of
:'lEnagcrs 6hall frcE tl.ue to ll.ire pay to provide fdr the payaeot of el1 eotld_
nlcd cxponsc,r grolrlng out of dr conn€cird trlth thc carrylng out of lrs func_
tlon6 under thts Ag;eeneti, :o !rlE: expenses of l{anagellenc, lnouranc,.!
prenlrds appLlqsble to the Ccat!,trr Leal pEopcrty (lf 6ny), tta6h collecrlons,
sllgr' reEoy8l, nurchase o.f thg Codlon Reel p:operly and capltal e*pendlEures
appllteble ro rhe CoaEou Real propclty (e.8., resurfsclng) not excledll8
58,000 p€r year. Further, thc Managhg A8.nt or Bdard Eay eatabllsh, out of
gJch a6ss6sEenEo, a hodeEt contl.rgency acd reFerve fund for the reDal,r, re_
plsccEenr and naLntenaoce of thosc portlotrs of the CoEro[ Resl proDerty thdt
Du6t ba replaced or repalred perlodlcally, Any Omer na, lnspect the AsEoct_
atlonrs recoads of recetpca sod expendltureE at coovetlent ,reekday or .{€ek€[C
buslness hours, and upon l0 daysr notlce to the Bosrd of ltanaglrs or Henagln8
Agent, If any, end any Oeoer o.ry, upon requeat, b. furnlshed a gtatetlrnt of,
hls sccou:rt, setttng forah the auount of any unpald eslca6tlents or other
charges due aod ouLng .froo cuch O$rer, At lhe eod of any calettder year, Eh€
Eoard of a[agers or the !,tattaglng Agent shsll crsdtt or refuttd to each Olrner
th. proportl.onare share of fundr thrn h€ld by thr Assoclatloa noc decEed ro
be necessaly !o rleet the Coonon Expen€eg for th€ followtnt yesr.
7. Enforcelent bllqsoclat:on, fte Assocj.atloo 6a:, auspend lny
ounels' votlng rl.ghts ln the Assocla!{on durl.ng any perlo.t or perlods dur{ng
uhlch the O!.aer f€..i.ls to neet ihe Olrner'o flnanctsl obllgatloas tlrileE th{s
Agieeoant.
8. I4enlg!-EgugEglr of coEEon Eipers.. Al1 auns ns8clsed by rheA66oclatlod but unpal.d for the oh.r. of Colntlon Sxpcndes chargeable ro styuntt 9hal1, uhen prop€rly record.ld. conatllule a lien on suctr Ualt prlor todll other llevrs and encurbrancen, cxcept onl)i: (o) rnx and gp?clal ss!"rs_fient uens on the Unlt ln favor ori ony gove r:r_r|n t.1 l. ,ruthortly rnd (b) all,
s(nig unpaLd on 6 flrst morrgaf,c.)f ricord, !::.,,,rljlut nlt unpdld obllgalory
6rrng aa n6y be provtded by srrch er:qul!r.rn.:, ,
If any a!|s nt shall ren.l{n j:.rald ,rjter 60 days froti the ducdate thlreof, tfie Bogrd of uan€Eers or l\hirq,,,ng ,lgan, rnay hpoae a penalty onsuch defrultlng ourrcr equal to 5! of crch such dsse3strent, ehlch penal!7
sha1l te edded to €ach eucceedlnS aagegsdent.
To cvlden:e such llen, the Bo€rd of lransgers or Man6glng .tgeiEehall prsp3!,g a vritton not{cc settlng fofrh th? errun t o! such unpald 1r_
debtednesg, the n8tre of the Oener oa the ontt .nd r deecrlpElon of the U.lr.
Such notlce sha:l bc 6{gned by one of the Board of llanagers or th. tdlnaglng
ASelrt and aay be recolded tn th.e off.tce qf, the Clerk and Recordar of th?
Couoty of Eagle,.StaEe of Colorado. Such LIen for Co@on Erpenscs shal.lalElch froa thc date of the fai.L,Jra of pa;nrenc of th! asaeasEeBl. Such ltenEay be cnforced by forecj.ocure of the defartLtlnt Crltorrs Untt by the Assocla_Eton ln llke Ea:ner as e Eortgage on r€al property upo. the r:cordln' of anollce r:r chlfi Eher€of. In .!ry ouch forecloaure, the ovner lrtl.l be requlredto pa)r Eha costg and exp€nseg of such proce€dlngs, and cogts lnd expenaes forftllag thc notlce or clalo of lteD rnd all .rlasonablc atEorneJrs, fcea. ?heY6nag1trg Agent or Board of l{anegerg eha11, ot behalf of lhe Assoclstlon, havethe FoB€! to bld on the U!1t at foreclosurE sale €nd ro acqulr. and hold,lea9e, Dortgage gnd convcl the rane.
9. ri'rrler8 ! Obllgstloo :or pay[ent of As8€ssdencs. Ttr€ aEouot of lhe
CotlloD Expense! asaessed egair_e! each Unl,t 6hal1 bc Bhe tndlvldual dabt of.
Ehe Owner ther€of at the tlne the asg€scoeut ls asde. Sul! to r.celve .
l ooey JudtEen! for [npald Co@on Expedd€s, and coria of gu1! aDd allorsays,fees, shall br Eal.rtatnabl. vlthout for.qloslng or ualvlng che ltcn rclurl,Egthe salqe. No
'saer
,oay exe.pt htdserf fro. ll.brltty for hrs contrrbutron
toearC th. Colrqon Expensee by ,ralve! of the use or e!rjo),!eEr of any of the
CoEnon Ble[ants or by abandonn€nt of ht8 or her Untt.
10. Llablllty for Co@on Expense Upon Transfer. itc Frnccce of a Unlt
ehall be Jotntly ard sevcrally 1tab1e vlth tbc grdntor fqr 611 unE.id a!aes8._
E€nts agalnEc ghe latter for lt6 proportl.on._L share of che Conson Expenses up
Co lhe Cltlc of the gr6nt o! conve_ra:tce, lrlihouf lrcjudfce to the grdnte!,s
ri8ht to lecovct froE rhe g;anior :lle naoui:{ 3ll,l !\. ihe grintee therefore:
provtCei, horever, that upon pa:,,r.1.r'rr,)! s rn.::... ..., :.,,c, ind upon srliten
iequesE, any Erlch prorpectlvc tra fi,|e shelj \r- .:;.;...,,r tl' d slaceEonc froo
fhe l{snaglng Agent or Bosrd of UanageE€ si.::l..li, f,rt!r c:ie doount of th€ u.i_
paid 4ss'.rlEent6, t!- any, slth respec: !c l:! s,rhj,,.c: Uqlt, thc dr(unt of the
currenr nonlhly,ls6es5,ren!, Ehl! .ja!e !ha; s ch nssegsitcnt becDEog due 6nd dny
credlts for adralsq psya6rls or for preFEid iteEs.
lL, . Eaceoents. For purposes of, carrying cuc dny ard all of the provt_
slons of rhls ASreenent, the Bylarrs and Artlcle6, the Assoclation lay Srant
such eaeetlents acaosE the Coruraon. Real prop6rly as EaI be deeEed ncccsasly or
deslrrble, plovlded they are beneftclal to ali Omers,
12. Acquj.sl!1on of Coollon Real ploperty. lhe AEsoct8tlon shall bc
eEpowored :o rrcgotiate for end purchaee the !q|!rq6. Reel ploperty loceted. !d_
Jacent to the Unlts, Eole full), descrlbed oo Exhlblt C attached heleto and
Iocorporated hereln by thls reference. yo purchase conE!.act executed by the
Aslioclatlon for such putpcee shall provld€ for d price ln excess of SS,OOO
unless 100i of all Ovflers shell conEcnt thereto. Addlltondlly, onc. sald
propert7 ts purchased and ouned by Eh. Assocletlon, o! € corporallon accin?
oo behalf of lhe A-Escclatlon, the Assoclarioo @ry tahe sEeps to laprove ,ald
re€l property as are reasonabry necesssry 30 facllltrte lhe rocdtr.on of notor-
ve;rlcle parklng thereou and day take steps necessary to Ea{:rtaln sald
?Eop6rty, all Ia a oanner belefl,ting each of the Or.ness on a falr Bod .qrr1t_
able basIs.
13. f{lsce1l: neous .
A. All the-pravls{on8 codtalned id thls &reet eni shBll contlnue
or reoaln ln ful.l foEce untll thls .{greeleoL ls tenlnated, revoke.t or
aEend ed as hlre{nsfter provlded.
B. Th16 Agreeaent EE)r be €qandedr t.rElnated or r€voked by Ehe
recordLog of e vrl,tter lnstr.leut speclfy{ng th€ adend'en! or effectlve ter_
olnatl,on or rcvocatlon, exec!:ted by thc Orners, es ehorn by the recordg of
the offlce of Clerk iad Recorder of the Counry of Eagl?, state of Colorado,
of unr!s repr€sentlng 8n eggreg'te otrnershtp !nieres! of at lcrst 752.
C. llre, provl3lcns of thia -.l8ree$ert shall be in addltton !o all
other provlrlone of lav of the Stace of Colorado an:t the Eaate! Declara!:.on
of ProCectlve Covenanrs rccorded for ya{l V..ll€ge ftrgr F1llng.
D. lttencveE uscd hereln, rrnlers ihe coolert shsll oEherrrls. pro_.
vld€, Ehe slngular nuDber shall lnalrde :hr l;r!rl, ahe plulal the slngular,
and the uge of any gend?r shdlL lncluC. .ril q,:.:,1,,rs.
E, Each Or.,ne" shnll rcAister ll..r ;:r{llng ,ddress t l!h th€ Associ_
atloo. Except for oonthly gt6teEeni itnd .):h,r. iou:Ine notlce6, $hlch gha1l
be perronally dellvered or seac by reg.-rlar cail, i.r.1 other nortccs or d.nand
lnlended to be sareed upoo ao Ol|aer shsll be dellvlred pcrsonell,, o? setrt
€lrher by r.glsrered or r,.rtM€d oall, postag. ptepald, aldrcrrcd l'n ebe
na!. of the OErer s! such reglrterad eatling 6ddrcsr. ll'l notlc"r, dcEend,
or ocher nottces ltrllnd€d to be sereed upon th,. Boltd of Uausgere of, the
Atsoc.Lotlon or the Assocl..tlon shell te s.nt b:, certlfied ua{l, postagE prc_650 South Cl,erry Strect, *IOOOpa1d, ro Dcnver, Co1orad.6 J0222
chen8ed by Eollca of addr.ss duly lecorded lrltt! rh! offlcr of, the Secretery
of State of Colorado.
F. Thtd &recdanE shall te bl,ndlng upon rmd sfiall ,.nqsc ro the
beneflE of che AseoclEtlon, €8ch O/net, iitd lhe helrg, personal representa_
t1ves, guqsirrrrr dnd eaa{gng of esch of cher.
c, The hralldlty atrd eBforceabtllty of an, pro,rlslon of thls
AgreeDent, ln lhole or llt part, shsll not sffect the valr.dtty or enforcc_
abtlJty of a.y other pEovrsr.on or any valrd aad enforceabre parr of a Dro-
vtslon of rh16 Agree6ent.
R. Ihe captlons and hesdltt6s hrrein sle for convenlence only snd
shal:. not be colslderrd Ln consErulng sny provtslon of thta &reeqent.
I. Fallure to euforce rny prgvlslon of this AgreeEent ghall lrot
operate as a tralver of any such prov{ulon or of 6ry other provls{on of Ehtg
ASEecEent.
J. nr19 &feeEent nay be cxecutrcd lo gcaeral countarpartr,
"achof lrhlch shall be doeoed sn orlglnal for pulposes of etforcerenE.
IN Hlf ESS l,|llEruOF, rhlr Agreenent has becn exequled Gffecrtve,
and date flt6e above nrllten.
VaiL ;nterna t.ional Inc.
Vail l:,'.crnaticnal Inc.
Darbart.U. Glaser
l{arvin J. iubeck & Sue lt. LubeckPaul D. Balstad f, i;r.ta C.
Rike n- Wootton 6
3?rb.1r,-: s. lloo i.ten
Rike D. vfootten IBartritr-a S. WoDtten
Delore.^ B. Coohill
fi. ?honrs Cdghil i
Char:lds Thor,a s parker
June C . parker
',VaJ ter i. - forbe scaren S. Forbes
Pejztoh i'. ;'erry
RanCall Bell t4ilhoar)Susan Brcwn Mllhoan
Johr 1,, Donovai
Helen H. Chatf ictd
O I Dwlrer-i{a! terllts n Co&pany
O' D.,r-ver-l{a term3n Cornpanv
HI
t",,4zl,l-t
Oqnvf( F
.{i:la
9) O
/- -./ t.. -'
"*Y
STAIE OT
couirY 0P
li l:onli
P1r"1
)
) tal
)
'^-'.f , r'i3. __, L983, by , .,r- .- ....r. ... - ,,-r^:.t, ,..3/,
Thel fote8otng tnstru!€nt6![r
.ack:rowledSad bcfore ae r\ts -,?.r day of
-.
.'e c!,-ner( s) af=TtlFjEex-;--
PI?IIESS Ey hsnd and officldl 6,!al.
yy coonlsslon expi:eg; ,tly Camn ttl,ton Erp,.at .t 6-tt1
cou:J'.'Y oF
A , r.,lr;*##ilJrLeL
Add:ess 'ir: ''. rr,.t-,.- q.n,t
rt!.--r :i-
-'.rlii-c:. )
) ss:P;-..r )
Ihe foregoln8 ln5 c ruacn-r- e:rs acknowledged before !e thls _.lg_ day of:"I'" llt = ---, 1e83, by .-,:,'*,r. v,.--t--..,,,,-.,
=:-"r. " i":..=fr-:-__ - arG;EEj=?-Ii]-ifiE,ffi--rotniouac AtaocLrlElon.
*, ,/*{{*, /'4 aq ,
Address r.^r r. p.r--F- 6^-..
SIATI: OP
COL'N:T OF
foregolrlg lnstErment rrai ackr-. r oor. ._J9'l'rd8e-d bef :re g .thls ? daw ofaL^[v,r,:qreo o"...u
-qJrI,
I day of_, 198#'tyM
%aE or.ner( s) of unr:7I-6FEIEro0Triloute AtaocIeclon.
WII$FJS Ey Ladd dnd o!-flcla! sEsl,
ily coool.sslon exptres:
W
ACdre6r
(SEAL) ' .
.*" :
.......
-lc-
-
l-,'-v , rsof, ty , ,/ !-- ,1.,.. ..
3C (l!.'narl .:) 'riounhouee Asaoc''a!1on.
qIT\TSS try hand and offlclal sea.',.
H'' coEElgrlon cnpl,res:
vz_* . al ornE(fiFiin-F-I'EEiiG
'ElalESS
Ey hand and offlclal see1.
U)' cgrnEl.sslon erplres !
. . '
.l,i,,;
^.:::r...'..1.:". .,ri:r:l ili,:heilZ ISg4
n-.,^J
J+4q. A,-*^A-*.__i+_,--F-'.-J]!Jr, .,1. aZ-EEz
&4.----a4
Aa^...,.-o,-,
foregol,ng lnstrurlect
1
STATE OP
COUNTI OII
?he foreeqtng
I{IINESS ry hand and offlc1al
l!j/ c.J|lErlssloD expl.res:
tli; $p;i55;;.; 1;i;11 g.t!!rcr ?Z l9g4
)') ss3
)
r.rstrule:lt rae acknowledged befoie
The foregotnB lnsrru&ent !rr. s 6cklo?+edaed before qe thls tJi/:f 66y 66'*:_:_ ._. :j-_*A'" .et* .d _J)+# **i
)
)
)
Da5
E6:
sesl.
|Ie thls.
No ta{i
::-k"."ltssd, before EelLis gLLg dar of
srArs r,F (61ORA0j )
cour\TY oP aeil vaR ) ss I
thc flregotng lnstruuent rdrc ,.,,-^,.r^J--J r - .LJ-_ W'- -""::'ir&ifi$.".l;i"f ir'.fl.."1':i,JC_,, aar or
#----;"--"*-.l-t;iTit=;f =;-*r*r, ,, hand rrld of f lcr.at seal -
Yy corirlggl.on expl.res:
STATE oF co<oqAoo
couNry oF ftavt R,
tl. "inii
6a-Gffi
qITNESS ny hrnd an..l offlcl?.I s!at.
eo@lsslon erplE"a ; My Corrlolstfon E..plres JunE &, lW
:.
SIAIE Of
cout|lTf oP
(S:AL)
i;^w:i
)) ss:
)
W:TITSS oy hgud anC cfllclal 6es].
vy cor1llsston explres:
a4
f9-r€golng ltrstt-rqent t'!9.v4
-_,
t9a{,
:- .*',,'1.
66 i J'?4''/'24'
STATE or (t Lvo. .I+
4oulry op Lry,-4""-_
Tbe foiegolng fuatruruenr, !ra.s acknonledged b.ioFe _Ee tltfe 14 azy otl,,t.,tun+ , t98{, by A "r""-1. P)
==.=---.l-----, @.o[nnou6e Ass0clatlon.
HIfli'ES S oy hand nnd offlctal serl,
gl:
srATE oF {2,* rn.d.o
couNrY ot ftLo-f*i^o.-
flIT ESS ay hand end offLctal
Yy coool.sg{on exPirca:,,"8m,##'"'
thtdn.rtL..r,!r.tltlltI3l' g|r"Y "L r|wrbr.@&A
Notary l,ubllc .: n, t .!it.|t
L'
Notary
the forcgol,gg
L.*
Uotary lublG
con;ry oF a^fT
Ttle foregol!8 lnatluoent uas acknowledgeC befo-re !.E thls tr:/ lo- f.+*f , rrerf ty ,1.:i^ .d a;.,.".-;=/lo-f.+*f , rrerf ty
=-_.=--:- -.=.---- ffiroen ilouse Aaaocla flon.
FII'NESS Ey hand aod offlctal seal .
- t-trt.;"*t""*n ccp:.re'I or*1lffirffi'lmfrt*t
-.!;. . ,:,,t,j...- :-{-
r'. /r.',,,. ra '
(lYlt. .'
STAli: 0F , ..r'...r .,...,..)
) sd:
CDLYInY OF /:. ,.-f-.,:- "--^- )J
The foregoloS Lnstrurent^rras .acknocledied bcfore,$c tht6 ..2)/r./ .lay of
rownhouse Aa'ocratloa. - ffi
srArE o! S,l+ttdo )
4ouNr:/ oF (t, o.rg]c-lu-<, ) ss:
,Ifj foreeotng Ins rruler-E_ nas, _acknovledged before oe znrs ,fij d"y ofI rqa]4-+ . 198tY bv -71,^.- -.. ^'\ -_..:----7-- '
=.r.=-444dlz-C-JrJc&rt"-,.a-^
---aE-6ffifurt 3A or rexasro$BnolI8e aaaoc1et10n.
!'InqESS ry hani aod off{cl,al seal.
r:y co'aisston erptres:'hh:$tiffit$fffiff'r'r?
-l a-
srA:t oF 6to" l')) as:
)
Addre6E
Z+r, , tt'l
,
-;\ ,/, . .',,'t.r.*)- t r.( 'r-; i t,,-1
Irora-rv yuifii--
Addrese ', (,t ( ;'I- . - ... .Ll ", aL\
'..r r -_.-- i.... , r.-tt-.
I
The toflnhouse on LOT gIX, VAIL VILLAGE FOURTE FrIJlNc, accordi;g ,a,:i-.to the recorded plat thereof. county of Eagle, state of 6o1oradc. r- .,'',.,':';:
. .;^...'.i
'..i'';;i
l.:iafhe lonnhouse on !O! ttlo, VAlr. VfLIJAGE FOURTC PILING; accord{ng ',-.'- .
to the'recordetl plat thereof. cbunty of eagle, State of iofoiiao' - ...'l':
. ,::
.i:.. -:...
i;'t;ilij'f;r'.,-ri.i.,r,,,,,-rlk:i ?,.;
..r'ri
1: ''r,' ,,':i':ii,
.t.
'
"t..'
D
iir:1 .r"
Frl I
\itr... ,.,. .,'l!..'1"'
2r
2D
3A
3B
IA
{E
5A
5g
5A
5B
7A
79
8A
0a
16 Unlt.
taiE nt|oa tnt.!.rt
5.153
6;2'
6,2a
6.23
6.2s
5 .21
6.25
6 .25
6.35
5. 25
5. 25
5,25
6.25
5.25. 6.25
6.25
100 |
FFI
D
D
d
':
EXEIBIT Cto Agleenent for the Porrtratlon'of the fexas Townhouse Association
dateal AprLl 13, !984
s9gl9]l_393!_ProE$l
Parcels of lanal sltuate in Lhe Courty of Eagle, State.of
colDrad,o consiBting ofr
(a) that portion of the core creek Drive.Fublic light-of-naylocatc:l ln Vail TiUage Fourth FII-ing whlch ls inurEdiately appurtenant ..:
.to the rea]' property desclibed in Exhlblt A to the lrithin Agleenentr ..
.
(b) that portion of, Tract 8-2, valL viliage Fifth Fillngidentified.by reference to the, shaaled area sholrn on the attached
Rider to Exhlbit c.
(c). that portlon of the Chalet Road rlght-of-way whlch Ls
lfimediately apirurtenant to the p6f,ee1s deacrlbed in (b) and (c)
above .
srfrq op h&n"a^) se:
)GorilrrY oF. (i.47- -"44-<-
fle foretolnt
i;-uififiaElGliEGEr6i
ITIINESS sy hand aod offlclel ccal.
Yt co'Ersst'on explres: lrcor*lordctrarnlf'lrlt*ilI.'..ii' '"*
ln3trrEent wea aek:ouledgcd bc f. :'-.
r98f, by l/:-xtt:. '6). Uj< n/4- !E clrher( E)
i*? ^i /, r.,-1 )I t ;'"1 -t | |'I'
BEST 'rt1is-,i6-
COPY
AVAfl.ABLE
.J.
r$.
am' ;'r,,i^
..'
,4;
'I' 'f ..
..,* - ,11 ''-
'bn
't#qir;-o
-+t
'$r
r{'
,tr t I
-!','
-rlI
' 'rtr
,l
:, .'
:. 1.l'
e1
'tl;', "
$;: P
t'*
',rir:
''
l|
r".i'
:
,.i*.i.'i
,-t)Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Cobrado 81657
tef : 970.479.2139 tax: {1O.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.om
General Informatlon:
Al prqecb requidrg design review must r€cehre approwl prior to submitting a building pemit application. Plece
refer to the subrnittal requiremenb for the partianlar appro\ral that b rcquested. fui application for Design Revbw
cannot be accoptgd until all required information is rcceived by thg Cornmunity De\eloprn€nt Departmsnt. The
pmirt may also need to be reviewed by the Torvn Counc and/or the PlannirB and Erwironmental Commission.
Itosign roview approval lap6o8 unl6sa a buildlng permit is is8uod and construction commoncG ulthln
one year of the approval,
Description of the Request:
Locationof thepropoeaf: Lot: Bl1 e@r,- f'jw,iui*, Ua/ l/i[4, #fr14
PhysrcarAddress: 141 Foo Cr*-Dlr.
-
parcel No.: Tlolo/ U9201 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(e):
Itaillng Address:
RECEIVED
N()V 0 8 2ii04
TOV€OM.DEV.
I' , ,& Baz-of Phone:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Nameof Appf tunt ftclro.|rG*rn, A.r-hir* , ll-f-
,1a)
Type of Revlew and. Sigrn
ih:,t*
t1'00 per square foot of total sign ar€a'
$650 For corstruction of a nelv building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residenlial or
cornrnercial buildirg (indudes 2$ additions & interior oonrorsiors).
$250 For minor changes b buildings and site impro\t€ments, $ch c,
reroofing, painting, windorv additions, bndscaping, fene and
retaining walb, etc.
$20 For minor cf nges b buildings and site improrerneflb, sudr a,
reroofing, painting, windor additions, bndscapiq, ferrces and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans alrcady approved by Planning Staff or the
De*Jn Revi€nv B@rd.
No Fee
a)J'
Fee:
Canceotml fuvbnr
l,lew Oorstnrtion
Addition
Mhror Altorat'on
(multi-family/commercial)
Mhor Alteration
(single-family/duplor)
Changes to Approri€d Plans
Separation Reryest
For Offfce Use;Onlyr ---.,-'Cfieckl.lp,: -
-By:
.t.6Y nnri llvleeting Date: l?-- t ' ? }-
-
DRB 15.:
Hanrcr. U-- Ptoject l.lo.:
Fage 1 of 12lo4.l01l04
.,
Project Name:
Project DescriPtion:
UGHTHALL ADDMON
Proje{t Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
483 GORE CREEK D& UNiT #8
Legal Description: Lot: 9 Block Subdivision: VAIL uLl-AGE RLING 4
Parcel Number: 210108235001
Comments:
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Community Devdopment
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Oolorado 81657
tel 970.479,2L39 fax:' 97 0'479,2452
web: www.ci.vail.co'us
DRB Number: DR8040545
Location:
NEW ROOF DOMER AND 138.5 ADDMONAL SQFT USING 250 ORDINANCE
Participants:
OWNER uGHTHALl, DIANE GAMEL IOILLIaOO4 Phone: 303-9854984
5293 W OBERLIN DR
DENVER
co 80235
License:
APPUCANT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCHIECT, LLCl}l tllz004 Phonez 97047 L-6L22
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7760
AVON
co 81520
License:
ARCHilECT MICHAEL SUMAN ARCTIITECT, LLCIOI LLIaOO4
MICHAEL SUMAN
PO BOX 7760
AVON
co 81520
License: C000001764
Phoner 970471-6122
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion BY:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
Acdon: MTHDRWN
Date of Approval:
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
iown of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities'
Cond:201
DRB approval shall not become valld for 2Qdary followtng the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Appronl of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year follotttlng the date
of final approval, unless a building permit ls issued and @nstuuction ls comrnened
and is diligendy pursued toward cornpletion.
Flanr|en Ebabeffi Ecld DRB Fee Paid: $3@.oo
\,,
Application for Design Revie
Department of Community Developrnent
75 South Frcntage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.21 3i9 faxj. 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Informatlon:
Al projs{s rcquiring d€sign revieu, must recei\re approral prior to submitting a building permit application. Pl€6e rofer to
the submittal requirernenb for the partioiar approval that is roquesbd. An application for Design Rsview cannot be
accepted unlil all required information is receivsd by the Cornmunity Development Department. The project may abo need
to be r€|vbwed by the Torvn Gourrcil and/or the Pbnning and Erwirorvrental Cornmission. Deeign review approval lapses
unless a buildlng permlt is issued and conctruction oommences within one year of tho epproval.
Description of the Request:
RECEIVED
OCT 1 1 2rii4
TOV.COM.DEV.
A+,L,l\
Location of the Proposat: tot: f4f ebck:
Physlcal Address:
Parcel No.:
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
ilalllng Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Appllcant:
Malllng Address:
E-mail Addrees:t+id*-/
Type of Revlew and Feel
. Signs
Cmceotual Review
Nlew Oonstnrction
Addition
Minor Alteration
(multi-family/commercial)
Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
Changes to Approved Plans
Separation Request
S.rbdivision:
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328€640 for parcel no.)
Phone:
Fax:
Sttl-s 6
Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign ^ru@ l3'lE=
For construc'tion of a new building or demo/rebuild.
For an addition where square footagp is add€d to any residential or
oornrnerchl building (includ€s 2$ additiom & interior oonversions).
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, sudt as,
rermfing, painting, window additions, landuping, fences and retaining
walb, 6tc.
For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenb, stlch as,
reroofing, painting, windorrv additiors, landscaping, fences and retaining
walb. etc.
For rEvbbns to plans alread approved by Planning Staff or the Dsign
Review Board.
+'t,
li
$50
No Fee
$250
$20
$20
No Fee
FllS[:*J*t''to(l a\Check l.lo.: l- r' _ By:_ov
--DRB'Ilo-
lrleetins Date=f -:OY-Hanner:-Roject l'lo.:
l%ge 1 of 12lMl01l$
jr-n l.r.ri trct
^tlfceotu
DGd|; F3rfr
-fr#E'E#
tt!-i:ttl-ttl r 7-2
d h,: -ufrrzY-Fdco -:'31-E
lr0 r-Gt
?*F
Et--
hrfltr-l*
r--rF:
It5:
-cd
lFJEtraF..:.iE. c#-
.0t'ffi1.El
. t hrAbrfia{-{rH
. hslffi|.*l
. OqrSFh
- tF|hd
Ibr
€b
lizls
irllfrPrarrtrF.
-:-Er-rrlr-l-E -fr i--trt.t I
-
D -t '-J
=-E-d--'-t--g:':=g:E:t--
*.-.FJ-,rgawroDa'trt-flF*rrr' G'-,' -a.J.---E---u*.aEdrDFH/#tt-'rfc-qrhirg5.
lp
al
t&F.
I9 SVd
br-gm
l-lt}|lfpI-l rrI'699S85S9E €E:rI iggztlllal
*a*rr*l*aa*lll**arall***'tff++*a*lla'llaa|}ara*******l+*+'3*aa*+a*laaa*rata*aa'a****lf++,'l***t'ttt*a
TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Stat€Nn€nt**l**alaaaara*a*r!a**a**ttl++fi'tlla*l+tlitr|.*****ltf+{'aa******ar*rra|.***a!a****a+++fl+**l'}*l** '
Statenent Mmber: R0400O6877 AmouDt: $300,00 LO/LL/2OO4O1:52 P!r{
Pal/ncrt trlethod: Check IDit,: itg
ttotatio!! *1011/urgIAEL,
SI'I{AN
Permit No: DRB0405{5 T}Ee: DRB - Addition of GRFA
Parc€l [o! 210108235001
site }ddreee: {83 GORE CRBEr DR varrJ
Location: 483 GORB CREEK DR, IINIT #8
Total Feeas $300.00
This Paynent: $300.00 Total ALIJ PrrtB: $300.00Balarce: $0.00
ACCOI]NT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description
DR OO1OOOO31122OO OESIGN REVIE}I FEES
Current Prts
300.00
. if-*;,t'
FRO,I ': Dr. L, M. Eduards Pfs.E FIl. : 516 759 624? Oct. Ell & l?.UPt'1 PL
TE(AS TOUTN HOUSE ASSOCIATION
dokeM.Edruerds
FO Eox{89
IoarstVdley, NY 11561f
516{71{852 ftx 81G789428, Vril l7}9tl8
cneit L8lsa I 23@nl.^o"rr
rut&.
Town oI Veil
Vdl,Colqedo t1657
DerrTorvn of Veil:
On bchrlf of tte onmsc of Tcrrr Town Houges, tlEil Gorc Cnck Ddvc lm VeiL
I wouldllkc o infom yoo dutthc orurcnhip hee votedthcirAFPROVAL for
lhe propooed dcsigl eacircule4 fur thc remodeling plen for unft ,E.
Yorrrs rincrcrly, /-/". o*-Y E{^-4
Irc MecCorrrickEdwrrds
hcddmt Texrs Town Housc Asoocirtion
PROPOSED I'ATERIALS
Type of MaterlalBullding Itatpriale
Irt
-ru
OtherWall Materials
F6cia
Scffits
Windours
\Mndol Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Frhhs
Chimreys
Trash Endosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterbr Lighting
Other
Color
ilA
-n,Can
-
,t//4
/{/
,A/
Notes:
Pleme specifu the manufacture/s name, the color name and number and attach a olor chip.
Fage 6 of 12lMl01lW
.4:f
r 0.1 1 .04
ESI
TOV REVIEW
RESITIGHTHAtt REMODEI.
north side imoges
l0.l r.o4
DENCE
TOV REVIEW
sul.tANAtctarlcel
tIGHTHAtt
,\
RESIDENCE REMODEI
north context imoges
l0.r r.04 IOV REVIEW
L!G}ITHAtt RESIDENCE REMODET
siding ond window design exomple imoges
to.il.04 IOV REVIEW
Land Title Guarantee Company
Date: O8-23-2W4
Our Order Number: V50006355-2
VAIL, CO 81657
Buyer/Borrower:
DIANE GAMELLIGHTHAII
Seller/Owner:
JOHN A. THAIN AND CARMEN M. THAIN
Wire Information:
Banlc FIRSTBANK OF COnOMOO
IO4O3 W COLFAXAWNAE
LA,KEWOOD, CO 80215
Phone: i03-237-5000
CTCdit: I,AND TITLE GAARANTEE COMPANY
ABA No.: t0700SAz
Account: 2l6052Ig2S
Aftentiott: Ainee Dupottt
**:t{r****,}***{r****,t***+****,t*,i**********!t ****,i*{r!i******r*!r**f *i!****
Note Once an original commitrnent has been issued, any subsequenr
modifications will be emphasized by underlining or comments.***'*'t**:t'l:****';:f*,|'t***:l,t**:t******'t*:*:i{.*****jt***i!'t**'tlt,t*r***r***,t***d!
ilf$fifii"t ll"ollT'lt1"Pil3;fiJ.%".fitf,r"]osing? check out Land ritre's web site at www.rtgc.com
torr coratrct 06/0a TtrANK YOU FOR YOT'R ORDERT
ESTTI\{ATE OF TITLE FEES
Alta Owners Policy 10-17-92
Deletion of Exceptions I -3 (Owner)
Deletion of General Exception 4 (Owner)
Tax Report fR009410
$6,300.00
$30.00
$70.00
97s.00
If Laad fitla du.lrat.r Copr.rly rJlI ba aJ,orlag th,l,tt.naro!!@, .lov. f.c, aiIZ bc eol,l.ct d rt c.b.t GL!..
TOTAL s6 ,3ss , 00
Chicago Title Insurance Company
ALTA COMMITMENT
Our Order No,
Cust. Ref.:
vs0006355-2
Schedule A
hoperty Address:
4E3 GORE CREEK DR.. IJMTS 8 AND 9 TEXAS TOWNHOME VAIL, CO 81657
1.
2,
Effective Date:Ausust 06. 2004 at 5:00 P.M.
Policy to be Issued, and hoposed Insured:
"ALTA" Owuer's Policy 10-17-92
Proposed Insured:
DIANE GAMELUGHTHALL
$3,650,000.00
3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to ln this Commltment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
Title to the estate or lnterest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested ln:
IOHN A. THAIN AND CARMEN M. TIIAIN
4,
5. The land referred to in this Conrmitnlent is described as follows:
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Sectionl
@equirements) Our Order No. V50006355_2
The following are the requirements to be complied rvith:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the firll consideration for the estate or
interest to be insured.
Item @) Proper instrumert(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record,to-wit:
Iteru (c) Paynieril of all taxes, charges or assessurents levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due
aud payable.
Item (d) Additional requiremelts, if any disclosed below:
1. RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED APRIL 15, 1994, FROM JOHN A. THAIN AND
CARMEN M. THAIN TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COI'NTY FOR TTIB USE OF
IJMTED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK TO SECURE TIIE STJM OF $I,25O,OOO.OO
RECORDED APRIL 25, 1994, IN BOOK 638 AT PAGE 5I3.
SAID DEED oF TRUsr wAS ASSIGNED To NEw u.s. TRUsr coMpAl.Iy oF NEw yoRK IN
ASSIGNMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 25, I 995, IN BOOK 676 AT P AGE 77 4,
2. EVIDENC]B SATISFACTORY TO TI# COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS OF TIIE TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
3. WARRANTY DEED FROM JOHN A. THAIN AND CARMEN M. TI.IAIN TO DIANE GAMELLIGHTHALL CONVEYING SU BJECT PROPERTY.
THE FOLLOWING DELETIONSiMODIFICATIONS ARE FOR TIIE OWNER'S POLICY.
NOTE: ITEMS I-3 OF THE GENERAL ExcEPTIoNs ARE IIERTBY DELETED.
IJPON TIIE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND TITE RECEIPT OF A NOTARZED FINAL LIBNAFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BEAMENDED AS
FOLLOWS:
ITEM NO' 4 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS IS DBLETED AS TO Al.l-Y LIENS OR FUTIJRE
LIENS RESIJLTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURMSIIED AT TI{E REQUEST OF JOHN A.THAIN AND CARMEN M. THAIN.
cHIcAGo TITLE INSURANCE coMpAr.ty SHALL rrAyE No LIABTLITY FoRANy LIENS
ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FIJRMSHED AT TIIE REQUES"T OF DIANE GAMELLIGHTIIALL.
ALTA COMMITMENT
SoheduleB-Sectionl
@equirements)Our Order No. V50006355-2
Continued:
NOTE: ITEM 5 OF TIIE GENEML EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE
GUARANTEE COMPANY CONDUCTS TlrE CLOSTNGOF THE CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION(9
AND RE@RDS TIIE DOCIJMENTS IN @NNECTION TIIEREWTTH.
NOTE: U?ON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF ALL TA)GS, ITBM 6 WILL BEAMENDED TO READ:
TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2004 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS.
ITEM 7 UNDER SCHEDULE B-?WI].L BE DELETED UPON PROOF THAT TIIEWATERAND
SEWER CHARGES ARE PAID {JP TO DATE.
********** NOTICE OF FEE CHANGE, EFFECTM SEPTEMBER l, 2002 ********r*
Pursuant to Colorado Revised Statute 30-10-421, "The county clerk:rnd recorder shall collect a surcharge of $1.00 for
each docurueut received for recording or fililg in his or her othce. The surcharge shall be in addition to any other
t'ees permitted by statute. "
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Section2
@xceptions)Our Order No. V50006355-2
The policy or policie to be issued rvill contnin exceptions to the following unless the same are disposedof to the satisfaction of the Compnny:
l. Rights or clainu of parties in possessio'nor shorvn by trre public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not showtr by the public records.
3 ' Discrepancies, conflicts in bolndary lines, shortage in area, encroacbments, and any facts which a conect survey andiuspection of the premises would disclose and which are not show[ by the public records.
4' Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or nuterial theretofore or hereafter furnished, imFosed by law and
ruot shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other nutters, if any, created, first appearing in the pubtc records orattachfurg subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposea insurea acquires of record forvalue the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commiment. -
6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as gxi5ring liens by the public records.
7. Liem for unpaid water utd sewer charges, if any.
8. In addition' tlte owncr's policy will be subject to the urotgage, if any, noted in Sectiou I of Schedule B hereof
RIGHT OF PROPzuETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOI]LD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMSES
AS RESERVED IN UMTED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 12, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY TI{E AUTHORITY OF TIIE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED ]N UMTED STATES PATENT RECORDED I]IiLY 12, 1899,IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITI]RE OR REVERTER CI.AUSE,BUT OMITTINGANY COVENANT ORRESTRICTION BASED ONRACE, COLOR, RELIGION,
SEX, HANDICA,P, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN I]NLESS AND ONLY TO TIIEEXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT IJNDER CHAPTBR 42, SECTION 3607 OFTHE I]MTED STATES CODE OR (B) RELA,TES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT
DISCR.IMINATEAGAINST HANDICAP PERSONS, AS CONTAII.IED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED
AUGUST 10,I962,IN BOOK I74 AT PAGE 179.
TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR TIIB FORMATION OF THB
TEXAS TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1984 IN BOOK 4OI AT PAGE249.
9.
10.
11.
tL.
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Section2
@xceptions)OurOrderNo. V50006355-2
The policy or policies to be issued witl contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposedof to the satisfaction of the Company:
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 31 RECORDED JANUARY 26.
1987 IN BOOK 456 AT PAGE 459,
14, THOSE PROVISIONS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS,
WHICH ARE A BTJRDEN TO TI{E CONDOMINIIJM UMT DESCR.IBED IN SCIIEDIJLE A, BUT
OMITTINGANTY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX,HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT
THAT SAID COVENANT (A) 15 EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTION 3607 OF THE
UMTED STATES CODE OR @) RELATES TO F{ANDICAP BUT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE
AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY13,I97O,IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE793.
15, EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE, FOURTH FILINGAND THE RECORDED MAP OF THE
TOWNHOUSE ON LOT 8, VAIL VILLAGE FOI]RTH FILING,
16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF LICENSE AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 29,
1999 AT RECEPTION NO. 713360.
(THE ABOVE ITEMS AFFECT LOT 9)
ALTA COMMITMBNT
ScheduleB-Section2
@xceptions) Our Order No. V50006355-2
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless tle same are disposed
of to the satlsfaction of the Company:
(THE ABOVE ITEM AFFECTS 1,OT 8)
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, nolce is hereby given that:
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing disAict.
B) A C-ertificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction rnay be obtained ftom the Couty
Treasurer's authorized agent,
Q The information regardiag special districts and the bouxlaries of such districts may be obtained from
tlte Board of County Guuuissioners, the Courrty Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Eftbctive September l, 1997 , CRS 30-10406 requires that all docurne s received for recording er filing
in the clerk iurd recorder's oflice shall coffain a top rurgin ofat least one inch enrr a left, right and bottom
margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or fle any document tlat
does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top nargia shall not apply to documents using forms
on which space is provided for recording 61 filing infornution at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every
title entity shall [e 19spo15ible fbr all lratters rvhich appear of record prior to tle time of recording
whenever the titlc euticy conducts the closilg aud is resporuible fbr recording or liling of legal
docutnettts resulting fiom the rallsactiou which rvas closed". Provided that Lmd Title Guarantee
Compauy conducLs thc closing of the insured transacdol and is resporuiblc for recording the
legal docurnelts from the transaotion, exceptiou nunber 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title
Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affinnative mecbanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (tlryically by deletion
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 6f ffls Commitmeaf from the Owner's Policy to be
iszued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A) The laud described in Schedule A of this s6mnrif6sal 6gst be a single family residence which
includes a condominiunr or townhouse unit.
B) No Iabor or nuterials have been furuistred by urechanics or ruaterial-men for purposes of
coustruction on the latrd described in Schedule A of this Cilnunitment within the past ( n6nths.
Q The Company must receive an appropriate aftidavit iuderurifyiug the Company against un-filed
mechauic's and material-men's liens.
D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage -
for urecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain constnrction information; financial information
as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; paymeDt of the appropriate premium frilly
executed Indenlnity Agreettreuls satistachry to the company, and, arry additional requirements
as nray be Ileoessltry utier itn exarr rration of the aforesaid intbrmation by the Company.
No coveragc rvill be given under any circumstances tbr labor or nraterial tbr which the insured
has coutracted tbr or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS l0-l l-123, notice is hereby given:
This notice applies to owrcr's policy commib:aents containhg a mircral severance instrument
exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2,
A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the surface esnte and that there is a subsatrtial likelihood that a third party
holds some or all iuterest in oil, gas, other rninerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
B) That such nineral cstate rruy iuclude the right to entcr ard use the propeny without the
surfaoe owner's pennissiou.
fl6thing herein csntrined will !s deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages
referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfed.
Form DISCLoSURE 09101102
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company and
Land Title Guarantee Company
July l, 2001
We recggmze. and rgqre.ct-lhe privacy expectations of today's consumers and the requiremens of applicable federal and
sB_[e pnvacy..Iaws., We belleve !ha!. m4lctng yoq awarc of how we use your non-public pg6snel information ("Personal
uuonnaEon"), aqg to whom rt is dlsclosed, will form the basis for a rblationshiir of tnist between us and the'public
that we serve. This Privacy Statemeff provides llat.explrJr,tti6n. We reserve thd right to change this privacy ^
Statemetrt lrom time to time consistenf with applicable privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
* From applicadom or other tbrnts we receive fiol you or your autlrorized representative:I firom your ratrsactions with, or hom tbe services beilg pbrfomred by, us, our affiliates, or others;* Frorn bur iutenret web sites:* Fro.m the putlic records p4intained. by gove-mmental entities that we either obtai-n directly from thoseelrtrues, or trom our amuates or otners; and* From consumer or other reporting agencies.
Our Policies Regarding the kotection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information
ffs meintafur p[ysicalr electronic and procedural s4fgggarrls to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized
access or rntrusron. we llDrt access to re persoDal Infbnnauon only to those employees who need such access itr
conneotiou with providing products or sgrvices to you or fbr other l6gitimate busineds purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
W_g.uuV s,hare your Persorul lutbrulation wirh our affiliates, such as i\surance conrpanies, agents, and other real
escate settlemeDt service providers. We also nuy disclose ytiur Persorul Informatioi:
r to agents, brokers or representatives to Drovide vou with services vou have reouested:* to third-party contractois or. service providers who provide servicrls or perform marktiting or otherfunctionb ori our behalf: and* to others with whom we enter iuto joint rnarketiug agreements for products or services that we believe you
may find of interest.
,tn additiorr,, wc rvill disclose your Pclsorul Lrfbruutiolr whcn you direct or give rs permission. when we are reoukedby.law to do so, or wltcn wc suspcct ftaudulerrt or criuful aciivitics. We alio mayaisclose vour PersonalInlorrllatrotr whcn odlerwisc pcnuitted by rpplicable plivacy laws such as, tbr exainple, wheir disclosure is needed
to efforoe our ngtlts a slng out ot any ngreetueut, uatlsaction or relationship widr you.
9-ry ql- thf ipRgrtant respousibilities of somc of our affiliated.conrpanies is to record documents in the public
domain. S\ch documents m4y contain your Personel lnfomution. -
Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion
Certain states afford you thc righl to access your Personal Inforrution and, under certain circumstances. to find outto whom your Personal Inlbrmation has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the rieht to reou6st
correction, amendD?nt or deletion of your Persoyl Informat'on. We reserve the rilht, wher; permittid by law, to
charge a reasoDable tbe to cover the costs incurred in responding !o such requests. -
{t!,1qq-u9sts subrrritted,to the Fidelity,Natiolal.Finarrcill Group of Compauies/Chicago Title Insurance Company
snau De rD wntl g, alrd oeltverco to ute tollowlllg address:
Privacv Cornoliiurce Ofticer
Fidelitv National Financial. lnc.
3HgffiA*i$ii?3'
Multiple hoducts or Services
[f we prov,ide yog r4th nrore than one financial product or service, you rruy receive more then sas privacy noticeIromus. we apologlze tor any utconveuleDce u s uuy cause you.
Form PR I V. POL. CH I
trJJ(t3iJ5=ZLgs
.t6
l a.{ a
cl lt \'.
oci I
Rci o -
B'.I g
N
I
l!
F(J
.trF
r ,,oo,zo.oo N
lnt
Fo
E
F.
-o.'o .oE.o 9bo .-
P."! I
FE g:
c€J(,
t
-o
s/P':,
OVOU 13:
,----"-:;;'-'
/' .///l;t"ir',';'..;T\
I
_8.
GI
(,
|Jlz
/
|rlFri
J
t.ol
.NI
F'()
<l
a
(\
h
c .bo-o'o'o FoPC . o -o?ro < I
=ttri ; A-rrxt:-
G€J
UJ
o
-oN
orO
ra)
U>
7
1,oo*\Q'"\
z/
Jld(Jtr
o-I t9(,
tt
Lrl
J
tr,(J
(L c.
." ^;$IERLINE__._--\ #tRl.s*-OY\"
t;ii,/
-cxc?.le"'
-..---{,5&f,
\-rm YEAR FLcoD PLATN
ts o gt68' PER F.E.M.A.
FLOOO INSITRANCE SIUOY
FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
(NOV. 2, r9g2i
\- RETAINING
ru-- Eltlll
a1?6'7'
qo
LANDSCAFING/OPEN SPACE EASEMENT
(sE€ BCfi 610, PAGE 269)
LOI 7
iYlo)\
(ot!
\o)
r.)
O)
RENOVE ' RELOCATE TEI
EXISTING TRA;SH ENCLOA
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
MANOR VAIL
z
llo0D
WALK
NRE HYDRANT
V/ATER VAL\€
inurr
3EV/ER UANHOLC
RIM ELEV- = al8o.6'
@ ll'lv. El.Ev. = E166.E
10 40'cc"
.IRASH ET.ICLOSURE
CAry PE\
\ -*rwD.r
DRIVE F.E.Y,GORE
T
t
...
rl
1t
t
Jt
{
Ii
I
aIiIj
EiII
3 i.::l
E iiEll
: l:q ilo iF
;ls;ti. -tt! ti
EJE
l
I
II
ct:.ri
i
lt r(l .I t..l r lI rtli!lti'li il
lr
lqii
I lir
t nii
J" ilil:!
.E
:E
;qt;
:.i
2I
I!t
8
b
8
t
E
a;
a
I
!
t
EI5r,{t6t6;g!
,!
etItir
"Jirs!
Fi
o;
aaul
: iitr!
'A
3I
3I
t
II
I
I
I
Ir
:Iiiri
Bt .ali
ii;
1;!
ir:!l i '
,l sE.t!;
:
iE3
i1;i":
,i!igtt !
El"!
r.?3'
;i:i:{ll
:!;EE!:l
aI
t
)
i, ll' \rir.il!I \lc! t.:: ,!i
Nr-iq
= \'rilrt !l:; li
o3 ! rv'rd n
/-
-,rallt-
d!c{
\\$N
.t
a
T
I,
T\
'(
li
i
]I
,r|'Igo-:
I
s
!trrai#
.Je:6at-
'^'.-I7i.'
-.,t '/ / /
r \$,/\ .\
.?
1)aq
3Eg*-E q-"-
i .d
HE:
o=FEZo-o-f
EeB
FIv-FPdb,
6
Fo
(9z
J
lr-
Fa(r
L
Iri(9
J.J
='=.r -
a>b
F:- E_<{-F
(J
EF
l!o
t-
E.
(L
oz
=<Fo
EF
TLo
FE
(L
Lo
lto
zI(n
E
alrJE
(9z
J
F
oIL
Old(9
JJ
J
Ia
it
t3
t:ll
ll
Ir
\\-ti/a\'/,,/
/;//', // .'",/
/ .,,. t.,,r,
...--
-.---.-\\
t'
I|,
I
I
-l
' *-o
QUIT CLAIM DEED
THrs DEED, made this tbW day of illt rilfu^- , 1es6, between rhe
TOlt|N 0F VAIL, a Colorado municipal Corporation, as Grantor, and the TEXAS ToI,INHOUSE
ASS0CIATI0N, a Colorado non-profit corporation acting as the attorney in fact for
the owners of the Texas Townhouses more particularly described in Exhibit A, as
Grantee.
l'rITNEssETH, the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar
($1'00) to the Grantor pajd by the Grantee, the rece'ipt whereof is hereby confessed
and acknow'ledged, has remised, released, so'l d, conveyed and quit clained and by
these presents does remise, reiease, sell, convey and quit claim to the Grantee, its
successors and assigns forever, ail the right, title, interest, clajm and demand
which the Grantor has in and to the described real property described in the
attached Exhibit B.
Subject to the following conditions, covenants,. restrictions and reservatjons
agreed to by the Grantee:
1' The Texas Towithouse Associatjon shall be obligated to maintain the surface
of the vacated roadway and to keep it in good repair including, but not limited to,
asphalt paving, repair of gutters and roadbed and snow removal as shal'l be necessary
to keep said roadway in good condition and repair and accessible to authorized
pedestrians and vehicles at all reasonable times. No property described herein
shall be used or occupied at any time for any purpose other than for limited motor
vehjcle ingress and egress to Grantee's townhouses for the sole purpose of parking,
non-exclusive pedestrian and bicycre access and the rocation of appropriate
landscaping,.signage, walkways and placement of trash containers.
2' No property described herein shall be used or ibnsidered in determining the
gross residential floor area or density that the Grantee would be entitled to under
Town of Vai'l laws and regulations.
3' An basement twenty (20) feet in width whose center line approximates that
of those portions of Gore creek Drive are shown in Exhibit B is hereby reserved unto
the Grantor for emergency vehicle and fire access. The Grantee hereby agrees to pay
for, insta'l I and maintain appropriate signs provided by the Town of vail Fire
Department designating the easement as an emergency vehicre and fire lane.
4. subject to Grantee's:rights to use said real property for the purposes
described in paragraph 1 above, the Grantor hereby reserv€s a non-exclusive easement
across that portion of the withjn described and granted property used for vehjcular
t'.,, O
'parking and access for the purposes of public pedestrian and bicycle ingress and
egress' Grantor further reserves a non-exclusive easement for the installation,
maintenance, repair, and use of uti'l jty lines by utility lines by utility companies,
publ ic or quasi-pub'ljc authoritjes.
5' At the westerly entrance of the property herein described, the Grantee
sha11 provide and maintain a sign to advise the pub'lic that, subJect to Grantee's
right to use the property for the purpose of vehicular parking and access, that
portion of said prbperty qsed for such purposes is open to the public for pedestrian
and bicycle lngress "nj "gr"".. This sign shal'l be approved by the Town of vail
Design Review Boand.
6' Should the Grantee violate any material restrjction, condition, covenant or
reservatjon of this quit claim deed, the property shall revert to the Grantor,
subject to Grantee's right to receive notice of any such vio'l ation and be afforded
an opportunity to cure same within a reasonable tine.
7- Except as otherwise, set forth herein, the conditions, covenants, etc.,
herein set forth shall run with the land and shall bjn.d the Grantee, ,i ts successors
and assigns; and all parties'claiming by, through, or under it shal'l be taken to
ho)d, agree, and covenant with the Grantor of said property, with its successors and
assigns, and w'ith each of them to conform to and observe said restrictions as to the
use of the property. upon a breach of any one of the conditions, covenants,
restrictions, or reservatjons herein set forth, or the continuance of such breach,
the above described property shal 1 revert to the Grantor, subject to Grantee's
rights as described in paragraph 6 above.
8. Each of the conditions, covenants, etc,, set forth above shal'l contjnue and
be bjnding upon the Grantee, upon its successors and assigns, and upon each of them
and all parties and a11 persons claiming under them for a period of twenty (20)
years from the date of thjs conveyance.
9. Inva'l idation of any of these conditions, covenants, etc., or any part
thereof by judgments or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other
provisions, whjch shalI remain in full force and effect.
T0 HAVE AND T0 HOLD the same, together with a'l 1 and sjngular the appurtenances
and privileges thereunto belonging or in anywise thereunto appertainlng, and all the
estate, right, title, interest, and claim whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law
or equity, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever.
-2-
o o
sea'l the day and
" IN l'rITNEss WHERE0F, the Grantee has hereunto set its hand and
year first above written.
T0l,rN 0F VAIL, a Colorado
STATE
COUNTY
oF C0L0RAD0 )) ss.
0F EAGLE )
of
e forego_ir9 Jnstrument was acknowledged before, 1986 by Paul Johnston as Mayor
Town ClerkbTlfie T-own of VaIt, a coioriao"muntctial
lrtitness my hand and official seal.
My commisslon expires:
'I
me this /L&'. a^n
and by Pamela Brandmeyer
corporati on.
as
-3-
lhr -rriei ltiailiarr ir .Ar
F
,,...diil BEST
C. -',
r{
I
--\
"'^ffi;\A. 'tr
-. ._ -Ir
c, , at"o
. :'... IAICEL A
irt:::,:jfil Sl.lr?I:]";,ri3 :lll:r: ,ry,.h-"lr*", .i""rrrrn8 ro rbr rrp thcro-.crtb.d |. follouri _____J or rh..E!31. County, cotorelo, Glrrk Id n.iJrill,.ii_
lltlT{r "-. p..ot oB .n:i:**:lt,:rrn,-.r*;r*
U ,U* n* ,=*r rr,,., i;iil*[T.:I'.il?:J5 :T:huuh;rr-;;;i,i'd. r., r.id v.1r vurrgr ro'rthc"'r Ei..r-oii-i-tii'iil?X'.i#f:;..::lt"lh: l11r':ty..'rgr.*i-".i ri".'*ti'iT.;il3:lli!il,i.!ru*;:ii:.i{li:i';i,'ffi '1- -grg;*$**n**fiffi ii';iu,ii::
. *i,*tfs;ffi ;-:ffi***ffififfii:,ri itu"'n":rts*ti,ry1; *+iittlliifiiii:*;"'
*ii,ffi g$$r.;}xT,i;###':tr*$f Hi_"THffij
iiil,'*T,.dsT'i#g;"$.1,#lr#,*ft i#ffi*m
A-prir ot coa. crc.l Drlt
PAR'EL c
, :*:i*.t.lillT,illJ,;,"iil #ii:"fiil:,.:,,i,,1i":Ti:1i.ff ,.:IJ*, .LT:_
'ugfir***$5g*t**.rr*;iruit:l;
^-r.ta of cor! cr.!k Drrvr
lARcrL D
::;:1"::"Li#=#il1.;,'iil ;lll'!':# :.#::l!":";i:ll":"j,,:::,i:t, .l$:
ffif**ff#$ip',,ffiHiffi'
fi***N***ry;.,s***t,i', ,
."8
ir ';
J(DslJgs
=i
o ard a
'9 r{ \rgR6!
R d .,'.
:., It
o/9'
,b
;o
A\,,OO,?Oo0O N,'s '9E I !,, 00,lo.c
l"oo.zo.oo53,Oq,? ooo0 s
I
t,
ll,
U,
-J ,6
.Ro.
(
\t
,'.v,J
booO,nI
i/v
el a
l"e#
ot ./l3rtl
o.o /
]}
o
-ol
s,
F(J
cEF
tr,. oo.z0! 00 ,
' ..:...;\{
OVOU 1:
----22
/-----1-=--'t-/.r' .//./
F(J-
#dF
bo-ob-o-o66+,j
=NY,lx||E<Jt
t4
a,
#r
/^"
lui
'(v,'8 I
EI
I
J" a^
Hld
J
uJoE
fl
:l
/tf,[?h
ml-
qi
tl
J
ol
-(\lolo
t.'
C)
tl<l
c.|
$F
c ?rrrN
-a\
/
J
UJoE
o-
o
_oN
o(!
toz
/I
/t,
tO
rt
lr,:o
_oN
rt)l|to
December 13,2004
Mr. Mike Suman
Mlchael Suman Architect LLC
PO Box7760
Avon, GO 81620
Re: DRB(N(F96,PEC04002
48{l Gore Creek DriwA/ail, CO 81657
tots I and 9, vail village 4h FilirE
Dear Mike,
Thank you br attsnding todafs Plannlng and Environmental Commission meeting, wher€ ths PEC voted ln faror
of the nquest for a varbnce from tho slde s€tbacks at the above-referEnced prop€rty. Additionally, I have staff
approved the Deslgn Revlew Boad applir:ation, as ths DRB had instructed at its December 1tr rnesthg.
I have attachsd the approval fonns whlch wlll be necessary for you to proceed with the building permit pooess.
Please don't hogllats to contact me with any remaining questions or conosrns.
Bes't regads,
Ellsabeth Edcl
970.479.2454
enclosures
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 8r6s7
970-479-2t38
Valuation: $40,000.m
FireDlace Information: Restricted: Y
VdrWl4" f,t 3lofrfb f, unil-gDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN
***'l*'i:r:t rr'**'r+t'**{.'t'l*,t'lt **:r**li**i,'rt.**t't,tr'li.*'*'|:.'iai*+ilt+tl**l++i*ta:l** FEE SUMMARY
Building---- > 9512.15 ResnDrant Plan Review- >
Plan Check-- > 5352 . ?9 DRB Fee----------- >
Add Sq Ft: 0
# of Gas Apptiances: O # ofGas Logs: 0 #of Wood Pellet: 0
$0. oo Total Calculated Fees--> $898.54
so. oo Additional Fees------ > S0.00
So . oo Total Permit Fee----- > $898 .54
s0 . 00 PalrFnts----------- > $S98 . 54
s898.54 BAI-ANCE DUE-------- > $0.00
Approvals:
Item: 05100 BUIITDING DEPARTMENT
oz/zt/z0os cgrurion Action: AP
ITeM: O54OO PI,ANNING DEPARTMEIIT
Investigation- >
Will Call----- >
02/25/2OO5 ee
Item: 05500 FfRE DEPARIT'{EIqI
03/09/2oos mcgee
S0. 00 Recreation Fee-------->
93. oo Clear}up Deposit------>
TOTAL FEES------------ >
Actiorx: AP
Action: AP Recornmend
monitored fire alarm system.
Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS
03/03/2005 Is Action: AP
T:ufaaTo,nhorwt
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE FOSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADDiALT MF BI.]ILD PERMIT Permit #: BO5-OOI7
Job Address.: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Status.....: ISSIJED
Location......: 483 GORE CREEK DR, UNIT #8 Applied...: 02/23/2W5
Parcel No....: 210108235001 Issued ...: 03l30l2ns
Project No...: --?RSOq -o\lE Expires...: w12612005
OWNER IJIGHTI{AJ,IJ, DIAf.fE eAIt{EL 02/23/2OOS phone: 303-985-4984
5293 W OBERIJIN DR
DEIiI\IER
co 8023s
License:
CONTRACTOR Future Builders Inc. O2/23/2OO5 phone: (303) 933-8200
7542 S. Carr Ct.
Littleton, Colorado
8 0128
L,icense: 803 -B , .r
APPLICANT Future Builders Inc. 02/23/2OO5 Phone: (303) 933-8200
7542 S. Carr Ct.
Littleton, Colorado_..
80128
L,icense: 803-B
Descipion:
NEW DORMER/ADDITION TO ROOF AND MASTER TERRACE. NEW WINDOWS
ON NORTH SIDE
Occupancy: R-3
Type Construction: V-B
Type Occupancy: ??
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the infonnation required, cornpteted an accurate plot
plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and stat€ laws, end to build this sftucture according to the towns zoning and zubdivision codes, design
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordirunces of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS F()R INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE rWnllTy-nOrn HOLJRS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR oFFIcE FRoM E:00 AM - 4
PM.
CONTRAC'TOR FOR HMSELF AND OWNEI
!.
PAGE 2
*,lr************:****ti*rf **rt,**!*{.'t****t '****rt***,t!{.****:t*'t({r**:t *{.,t *i.************{.:F*!***r't *****'**********{.*:t ***:**:**
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit #: 8054017 as of 03-30-2005 Status: ISSUED**|t**'}:t*:**'f*'|.**'t********{t{.'}*'}*'*:}!********!t*,!'t*,t*:t'*'t*!t*,t*******!t*********:t.iti.*!t*'t.*:t.*:l.l.**********!*:t:t******
Permit Type: ADD/ALT MF BLIILD PERMIT Applied: V2l23l2Ws
Applicant: Futrre Builders Inc. Issued: 03/3O12OO5
(303) 933-8200 To Expire: 09126/2W5
Job Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
location: 483 GORE CREEK DR, UMT #8
Parcel No: 210108235m1
Description:
NEW DORMER/ADDITION TO ROOF AND MASTER TERRACE. NEW WINDOWS
ON NORTH SIDE
Conditions:
Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE PJQIIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 14
(BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALTS,CEILINGS,AND FLOORS TO
BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL.
Cond: 16
(BLDG.): SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQLnRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND
EVERY STORY AS PER SEC.31O.9.I OF THE 1997 UBC.
Cond: I
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQTITRED BEFORE ANY
WORK CAN BE STARTED.
Cond: CON0006994
shop drawings for the SIP roof panel must be reviewed and
approved by the engineer prior to installation. two copies
are required to be submitted to building departrnent.
*faaffllaa*aaaatallaaalafffalaaaaatftt*aaaffafttaa**a****ttatttttttt*tttt+ttttttfttttttttt*a
TOWNOFVAIL, COI,OR.ADO Statcm€nt****'|l*lf++tffaaaaa*fl**ft**ti'l'Saatfaafa*{r+*t++ff+fa{''ll'}'}affff***fft*t'l*a**ataaa*rt}l'}**aaa*+*
SEatment mildc€r! R050000310
Pa)m€nt Method: Check
Buil.ders 10247
Amount: $898.54 03 /30 /2oosL2z4l PlttInlt: DDG
NotsatioD: Future
Permit No:
Parcel No!Site Addreag:
IJocation:
ThIe Palment:
ACCOI]NT ITEM LIST:
AccouDt Code
00100003111100
00100003112300
00100003112800
BTIIIJDING PERIT{IT FEES
PIAN CHECK FEES
mLIr eeIJIJ INSPECIION FtsE
s898 . s{
9898.54
$0.00
current Ihta
542,75
352.79
3 .00
*llaaftttllaaffft*aaafr.**fffaaaaaal***at*ataaffaaa+**t*t*++ll**l***'}*'}'t'}*+fllll***l*l**taaaa
805-0017 Tylrc: A[)D/ALT Ur BtnlO PBRI,IIT
21010S23s001
{83 C'ORE CRBEK DR \TAIIJ
{83 @RB CREEK DR, n[IT #8 Total FeeE:
$89S. s4 ToCaI ALL Pmts:
Balance:
Descrl.ptLon
BP
PF
Itc
\
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR
n01rga11p
Proiect #:
Building Permlt #:
t .. ,.i/
mechanical etc.l,- -,,iiu
NnlW
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vall, Colorado 8165/
i."-,,i.,t
ui)
t::llCONTRACTOR INFORMATION
General Contractor:
pffuiAerc. lnc.
Town of Vail Reg. No.:
607A
Contact and Phone #'s:
tuoh 309.10t.6111
COMPLETE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT & Materlals
BUILDING: $ 19.O$ELECTRICAL: $ 7r0A)OTHER: $
PLUMBING: $MECHANICAL:$TOTAL: S 4O,0M
For Assessorc Offlce at 97G32&8610 or visft
Frldil 210l8zrtul
JobAddress: (& fu. ArnLV,
Lesat Descrlpton ll lot:8.r1 ll ero"r'Flllng: Q l:Wti-subdivisron: Va;l Vill.4oT#"U
rytrJE:Lt LzHr.Jt h9*8Ti *1,, h r>-.*-! rn b?BC '*82"'tes.+?ic
Y'EIWHX'tr|LL.+ ut 'nofb.441.q*,
ZfEXf Fu.i^'r.i-..IJL HWT-E" Aa^.co fltub PeBl9cz^.Ht
Detailed descfi otion of *ork'
n;'$" .{ u.J ryI* t*.- tVa'-,u^)r..t ,, - prt}+t,lc,
WorkClass: New( ) Addition( ) Remodel( ) Repair( ) Demo( ) CIherg() 66*rtul$4"-
WorkType: Interior( ) Exterior( 1 eothld Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) Uo t.{
Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Multi-familV;i{ Commercial ( ) Reslaurar ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: ll-No. of Accommodation Units in this building: y'
No/Type of Fireplaces Existing: @s Appliances ( ') Gas Loos ( l ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Buming (
No/Type of Fireplaces Proposedffis Appliances ( ) Gas Loqs ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burninq (NOT ALLOWED)
DoesaFireAfarmExist: Yes( ) NoQfi9|r{|co4l IDoesaFireSprinklerSystemExist: Yes( ) No43
Parcel#Contact
ffiFOROFFICEUSEONLYffi
Othrr Fees:
DRB Feeo:
Publlc Wav Perrrll Fae:
Flus€rs\cdsl^FORMS\PERMITS\BLOGPERM.DOC M.toatzop/.
STATRS & 17
l0 40'cc"
lEASH ENCLOSURE
CA iV PEST
\ .'o,v,)-.-
\l
It,
II,Ifo
I ACRES
ti79.4',
17.52
N 79 22'Or}'W-:.,42.5
DR|VE -F.Sf..y.
PARKING
/,'/l\\''
{t/
\! RE;AINING
I
h,A,
II
LANDSCAPIIIG,/OPEN SPACT EASEIJ:N I
(sEe Bco< 610, PAe€ 26e)
CEN TERLI}IE
CRE€K SETBAO(
'la
4177.6'
(cROrrNo)
GY,
'^\ ]ti
MANOR VA.IL
Iz.7?.0F
Liailftew
NRE HYORANT
WAIER VALVE
:EV/ER MANHOII
RIM E'-Eir. = fi4o.6
@ lNv. ELEV. = 8r66.a'
Department of Gomm unlty Development
Prdect Name:
Proiect Mdress:
I ThlsCheddlsd musf he nmpteted before a Butldlng Permil ap,olietlon Is
amoted-
y' o A| pages of +plicdion is complete
y'e l.bs DRB apprwd obtained (if required) Frovkle a copy of approvd form
y' e frndominium Association letter of apprwal attadred if project is a Multi-Family complo<
,r/e Ornplete dte plan submitted
Nhl RlUicWry ftrmit 4plicatim induded if applicable (refe to RrblicWorkschecldid)
y' e SaginS plan iduded (rder to RDlicWorksdnddig) l{o dumpciler.oarklng or materlal gtoraoe
allryed on roadwalrs and rhoulders wlthout wrllten aporoval
,VA e ,nsbe€tGtd and rqdtss.brnitted if demlftirn isocurning(l , { Archit€d stamp and signature (All Canmercbl and Muhi family)
,/ e full floor plans induding building sedbns and dwatkrn{s sts of plans for ifulti-Family and
Ommercial B.rildings)
/ , Wlndor and dor dredLde
/ e R.rll strudural plane induding dedgn criteria (i.e.leds)
,/ e 9rudural Etginee $amp and signature on dructural plans (Al Ommercid and ilulti Family)
4f, e $ils tuport mud be srbmitted prlor to footing inspection
( e Fre reddirre asnblieo speified and penetrations indicated
,/ e gnoke detectors droln on plans
,/ e Type and quantity of fireplaes slrovn
Appllcant'c Slgnalure :
Date of submittal:
FlUseFbdevlFORMS\PERM ITS\BLDGPERM. DOC
Recelved By:
vzazw
BUI LDI NG PERIII T I SSUATTICE TI ME FRATIE
lf this permit requires a Torn of Vail Flre Department Approval, Ergineer's (Rrblic Works)
revieyv and approval, a Hanning Department revianv or Health Department review, and a
revial by the fuilding Department, the estimated time for a total review will take m long
as three (3) weeks
Al ommercial (large or srnall) and all multLfamily permits will have to follol the above
mentioned maximum requirements. fusidential and srnall projeds $rould take a l€sser
amount of time. However, if residential or smaller projeds impad the various above
mentioned departments with regard to necessary rwieur, these projeds may also take
three (3) weeks to revial and approve.
Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit a stx)n ai
posdble.
l, the underdgned, underSand the plan cfied< procedure and time frame. I also
understand that if the permit is not picked up by the o<piration date, thet I mu$ still pay
the plan cfieck fee and that if I fail to do so it may affed future permits that I apply for.
Agreed to by:M;L.lJ;,,-,,
Roject Mme:
Date: l7'Z?.. o+
Ffint name
FlUs€rs\cdov\FORMS\PERMITS\BLDGPERM.DOC 02/03t2004
@edilann:
eroFCOraqlnttal:
Liaen$i qDO0lE{
__ r|!ftcfod'r* 4st GoRECREB(ORVAIL.iE3 GORE CREEK D& UTUT #8
trgd D-crFdoor f.G qr9 Do.tc grD0unon: VAIL VI.LAGE FIUI{G .1.
Farcd ilumbrn .210mg235o0t
Go|Inlrbs
tl 0|:lln frorT0f,l 0t Vllt ffiltlTY DEVEtOnCiT 0t0ltet$z T-t6t P.00t/008 F-238
Design Rwieur Boed
ACTIOT{ FORTII
.- *q?qntrt C Cdrltrufry DadoFment/r:rldt-Fimtrge Roirt, Vdf Cobfa& g165l
tef: 970.479.2t39 tan im.cn.z+n -'
rnb: wm<l!d.o.r.rs
On8ffutDcr: DRIO{0S96
g"ffiJ$aff#ffiff copper todb be adttd on tE rp'd' si,. of urc bunil.,nq,
hEdFU*lr
@lrNER u6{tHA!}^-D_I4ryE GAMH_ ttftst@ prrorc: :b}9$S<e&fszg3WOBERufrt DR
DS{\,ER
@ 80zts
lJcensc:
AppucAtrrr tr{rorAEt Sr.tirAN ARorrrEcr, Llclrrwzo* phonq 97G47r€122MIC}|AELSU''IANpoEo(2,60
AVOII
@ 81620
LlGtse:
ARO{nECr motA+.lltArr ARo{rTEcr. trclvrqnm4 pfpr: 9(}4?r{u2MICI#IEL SUIiIAfl
PO BO( 7760
Al/oN
@ E1620
lacedon:
llodons
Slcad By!Y@
O|dffon*
SOARD/SrAFF Acllox
Adorr; STAFf,AFR
Dafrr of Apgrowl-. r2l'3lZDA4
@nd:8
IIS)t-lto *rycs o rheeo pbns qay be nbde ffi.trt ttrc urrngr @nscnt of r-,n dvatt staff and/or the +propntit",e,rloi "#ffie1$.--'Cond;0
(RAN): DRB aFptDwd docs not @nsutrrE a perrrft fbr hrifilng. plese consuft wtdt
, lplgal26g4 t6:50 3039884694111 LIGI{THALL PAGE 61
fVi'n;(< ,,9u,fta-'\ l, rX '?za - f ??-- zrt/
fMfiL' D tfi" L{frhfl'7 rl
TE(AS TOUrN HOI'38 ASS(TIATIONdoleeM.Edrrrr&
FO Boxttll_ Locust Vrllcy, Ny 11560stffin{f67, ttx gtts.73s-61!|l7,Vdl 4t9-952S
cueiL LBlwr I 234@eot.on
fiHotr
Tornof Vdl
Vdl,Colondotil657
DcrrTowlof Vri&
On bclulf of ttc ownen of Texrc Town Houoee,lllit Gon Crec|r Drivc in VeiLl-woold tit." b inforn yor old ft" onr"un*e-tric vot"a ur"iiffinovll r*thc propocd acftn raarrotc{, fon il-.-;;od-iru ;lei i"" r"l-r i;
Yourrdnucdy,
4;*"a"J
I.GMrt€fint tEdwrrdrHdent Tcnr Torrn Hou,rcA[ocidon
Deryrtn ent of &nmunity Development
Building hfetyand Ins@ion *nices
75 South Frontage R@d
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-4+2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.wigov.@m
BUITDING SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICES PIAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
TO: Contractor/Apolicant
Future Builders Inc.
Brooks Hayes
FAX #: none given (mailed)
NUMBEROF PAGES:
FROM:
DATE:
BUILDING PERMIT #:
OWNERS NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
OCCUPANCY GROUP:
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
NUMBER OF STORIES:
BUILDING AREA:
Architect Structural Enoineer
SumanArchitect WilkensEngineering
proj#4O4
479.75L1
proj#04-tt4
845.6324
2
Chris Gunion, Building Plans Examiner
03/08/2005
805-0017
Lighthall
438 Gore Creek Drive #8
R-3
V-B
3
nla
The documents submitted for this project have been reviewed for compliance with the The 2003
International Building Code, 2003 International Residential Code, 2003 Intemational Mechanical
Code, 2003 International Plumbing Code and 2002 National Electrical Code as modified and adopted
by the Town of Vail.
Thefollowing otnmenE will ned to beaddrM priortu isuaneof a building prmit:
For processing:
o Please submit two comolete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested
information with all olan revision items clouded or otherwise identified.
o Please resoond in writino to each comment bv marking the attached list or creating a resoonse
letter. Indicate which olan sheet. detail. soecification. or calculation shows the reouested
information. Please send revisions to the attention of the olans examiner with the building
oermit apolication number noted,
o Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the engineer's or architect's "wet" stamo. signature,
rqistration number and date on the cover page of any structural calculations, all structural
details and structural sheets of the olans. For commercial or multi-familv proiects all sheets of
the plans must be stamoed.
1 An asbestos test and repoft is required for all remodel/addition projects.
Architectural Comments:
2 Please include a building cross section cleady showing ceiling height at the proposed master
bathroom shower. A minimum of 6'-8" ceiling height is required. Amend plans as necessary. (R305)
Please also review ceiling height above the tub. If the tub is to have a shower head, 6'-$" is required
above the tub.
3 Specifo stain,ay to comply with the following: (R311.5)
-minimum width of stairways shall not be less than 36"
-maximum riser height 7 a/e"
-minimum tread depth of 10"
-minimum headroom clearance of 6"-8"
-handrail on at least one side of stairway 34'-38' above nosing of treads
-handrail ends to be returned to wall or terminate in newel posts
-handgrip poftion of handrails shall be L L/4"-2" in cross sectional dimension
-handrails to be continuous between landings (can be interrupted by a newel post at a turn)
Structural Comments:
4 Revise design criteria used in structural design. A 100 psf roof live load (snow) is required for roofs
with less than 4:12 slope. (TOV snow load)
5 Veriff floor framing for master terrace is capable of supporting the proposed hot tub.
6 Provide written verification from the SIP manufacturer to indicate the 6 1/2" roof panel is adequate for
the proposed 17' span with the 100 psf live load (snow)
7 Speciff connections of new 5 V2" LVLfloor and roof beams to the existing beam. Sheet S2.1.
I Include floor framing plans for the new stairway area.
Please refer to the cover sheet for information on resubmitting plans. In order to avoid delays in issuance of
the building permit, please check all requested information is included with the rcsubmitted plans.
Chris Gunion
I.C.C. Plans Examiner
Town of Vail Building Safety and Inspection Services
970.479.2369
cAunion@vailgov.com
F:\cdev\CHRIS\PERMIT.COMMENTS\805-0017.DOC
Conflrmatlon Reeort -Memory Send
Paco
Date & T Ine
L ine I
E-na i I
llachlne l0
001
llar-08-05 l2: l6pr
9t04t92[52
Towr{ 0F vAtL c0iluluTY DEVEL()P[f1{T
Job nunber
Date
To
llunber of pales
Start t ira
End t lne
Pag6s sent
Status
Job nurber : 103
: 103
: llar-08 l2:l5pm
: E91797511
: 002
: llar-08 l2:lSpn
: llar-08 l2:l6pn
: 002
:0K
*** SEND SUCCESSFUL +:f *
*ot -nr a, @t !.24ra* rv@t,-,c
Nrdrtet 9t q.-ndtl@, s2+tn
.759.tU, l"@r- lW
v*. an*.cb €r,t z
92U"9+tta
A.x9H29-24fr?
,tyrvltv.t&^c-.arf,
Butt-Dlf,G s.atE-rY 'rr{Er rr{sPltcTtclr\l 3ER\trcls Pl-'a RE\ZIEi ',
CcrltltE[tEh
Ar'chltEct
Suarraai ArchltectproJ#4O4479.2stL
TC':
FAX*:
c6ritr.ctoilAqallEa.tlf,FuturG lr.|lldars Inc.Br€oki Hayas
arcrnc atvErr (anallGd)
S5l'|cblral-EDslnsclVVllksns Errgln.€rlngproj*ao4-144g45-6324
NIJI'IEEF, O' PA€!'I
FR('I'i:
E A-f!rDL,ILC'ING P!R.}'IIT *:
CN'I'IIIERS NAMEI
3lTE AE)E R.IS!-!
OCCIJPA GY CROUPT
'FttPE <t? ect. ltrFrlJcTrol..
h|IJIUIBIR. C'F STC'T:IIST
BI,II-DI|rlE; AREA:
2Chrls Gu|.|ton, ElualdlnEt Plan3 ExatnlnGr
oSfoelzoo5BO5-OO'7Llqrehrll,t3-€t GorE Creak E)rlwG #8
Fr-gv-B3n/-
-rtre doc(rft1ent- aufrrnltt€d for ttrtg P..oJGct t1a\rc- b€n r-\rlerrv6d lbr corrrpllancc vr'ltl'l tlrc _rhc 2oo3
lnt inado.r.l Bultdtng Cadc, ZOO3 IntarTretton.l nEibl-Gai € -a-, 2g63-tr'tEinago1.'l M'GlianlcEl
Cod., ZOO3 tnlErn.rten-t p]|rrt.tbrng Code q.!d ZO(;'i.r--ifo.tir-fsllai;G.t code.- r|1odtttGd 'nd
qdoPbd
by the 'fov\rrt qf wlll.
,rr- tdrond.rg, @rrt rqt,.*tttard b b tat&try* b iretttt'G' eet bstHtt'91
f-Tnrrarrrraton v.ltr- -ll olan.-.rrj* ltc
TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALT MF BIIILD PERMIT Permit #: B05-0017
Job Address.: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Status.....: ISSLJED
Location......: 483 GORE CREEK DR, UNIT #8 Applied...: Ul23l2W5
Parcel No....: 210108235001 Issued ...: 03130120fl5
Project No...: ,e,, .t - .t ^ a Expires...: 0912612Cfl5r r1 of-ofti
ohlNER IJIGI*TIIAIJIJ, DIAIIE GAMEL 02/23/2005 phone: 303-985-4984
5293 W OBERIJIN DR
DEN\/ER
co 80235
APPIJICANr Future Builders Inc. O2/23/2OO5 phone: (303) 933-8200
7542 S. Carr Ct.
Littleton, Colorado
80128
Lricense:803-B
CoNTRACTOR Future Builders Inc. 02/23/2005 phone: (303) 933-8200
7542 S. Carr Ct.
Littleton, Colorado
80128
Lricense:803-B
Desciption:
NEW DORMER/ADDITION TO ROOF AND MASTER TERRACE. NEW WINDOWS
ON NORTH SIDE
Occupancy: R-3
Type Construction: V-B
Type Occupancy: ??
Valuation: $,+0,000.00
Fircplac€ Informadon: Resriced: Y
Add Sq Ft: 0
# ofGas Appliances: 0 ,r ofcas L,ogs: 0 # of Wood Pellet: 0
So.0o Totrl Calculated Fces- > $938.54
S0 .00 AdditioMl Fees------->s0. 00
so, oo Total Permit Fee------> $938 .54
$938 . s4
s0.oo
:r*****'**:.*{.**:}i.*'}{*'}{.*r{.**'r***{.*+i**rrr{'r+rir*t **'r**{r:t*******r*rr*|.rr* FEE slJMl[\Ry
t*l'i:a*'aa:t*a'l*at:t|ltttt:tt|aa{n}*a:llatta*|l**at*a*'.,t'tt'a'a't'}'}'t*a't:t:*a
Buitding--- > 9542.75 Rcshnrant Plan Review- >
Plan Check-- > 5352 -19 DRB F€e----------- >
Investigation- >
wilt cdl---- >
S0.00 Rccr€ation Fee------- >
$3.00 Clean-upDepo6iG----->
TOTAL FEES_-__-- >
$0. 00
S938.54 BALANCEDUE._-_>
Approvals:
Item: 05100 BUIIJDING DEPARIII{EIi|II
,3/2L/2OO5 cgunion Action: AP
Item; 05400 PLANNING DEPARI'!4EI{I
02/2s/2005 ee Action: AP
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
O3/o9/2O05 mcgee Action: AP Reconmrend
monitored fire alarm system.
Item: 05500 PITBLIC WORKS
o3/o3/20o5 La Action: AP
**|rfrtrr;*1*.1+o''*'**','.*'.*l{i'a|1*|t'|1|1t*|n||t|t|*||*|r'*l||i|'ll|:tl.{||i*'*|
See page 2 of this Document for any coditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, conrpleted an accurate plot
plan, and state that all the information as required is sorrect. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and state laws, ard to build this stnrctrre according to tbe toums zoning and subdivision codes, design
review approved, Uniform BuildfuE Code and other ordinances ofthe Town appticable thereto.
P.FQIIESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOIJR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 47$2149 OR AT OIJR OffiCE FROM 8:(X) AM - 4
C"TOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
PAGE 2
*!t****l.!t*:tl.:*{t*t,ll.'t**'t*'t!t|t*|tlt!*{.,|*{.*'t{.****:F{t,t.:}!t.*!F,}*'i*:}'t!*******.t*{l***'}'F***
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Pennit#: B05-0017 asof05-18-2005 Sbtus: ISSUED
't+!tl'f*,t.**l.'|***'l*'t|.'f*!i!t!'******:t*'t'}*'t*'|t't*|*'t*|'|.|l.*'|.!t't.**!t****,|'{.,|***********
Permit Type: ADD/ALT MF BLJILD PERMIT Applied: OZtz3tZNs
Applicant: Funue Builders Inc. Issued: O3l3DlzC/|ls
(303) 933-8200 To Expire: Wt26t}ffi5
Job Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
l,ocation: 483 GORE CREEK DR, UMT #8
Parcel No: 210108235001
Description:
NEW DORMER/ADDMON TO ROOF AND MASTER TERRACE. NEW WINDOWS
ON NORTH SIDE
Conditions:
Cod: 12
@LDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO cHEcK FOR coDE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 14
(BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALIJ,CEILINGS,AND FLOORS TO
BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERJAL.
Cond: 16
@LDG.): SMOKE DBTECTORS ARE REQIIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND
EVERY STORY AS PER S8C.310.9.1 OF THE 1997 TJBC.
Cond: 1
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQURED BEFORE ANY
WORK CAN BE STARTED.
lllli**+llllllffffllffflf*tllaat+tllllll**lffa'|llaaal*aat*t'l*'ita*rr*aaf'aaatalttfatafafftla'ra
TOWNOFVAII4 COI,ORADO Sratmcnrl|}afaaatatftffaaaaafal*tll*latlfffaaaaaatlaaataaalla**+****l****t**al'*llalllalla+lllfllatt+a
gtatesn€lrt l{\rmber: R05000062S Arrcunt: 940.00 OS/L'/2O0SO1 :20 pMMetlrod: check t"t?JA*:
nrrureBuilderB 10313
Pcrmlt Nor 805-0017 4?e: ADD,/ALT UF BUIIO PBR![{IT
Parcel No: 2101-082-3500-1Slte .lddrege: {83 G|ORE CREEK DR VAIII
LocatLon: a83 crc)RE CREEI( DR, tt![IT *8 Total PeeB: $938.54fhJ,e Palmene: $40.00 Total AIJJ Pmtas $938.54Balaace: $0.00t+tfttaaaaaaaaaatatatf*t*rtltffflatffa*afallttlll***+*rrr*tllfllllllltfatffaa'tlaaaafallft'tt+
A@OUNTITEMLIST:
Accorrnt Cod€ DeacriptJ.on clrrr€lrt Pmts
PF 00100003112300 plreN cHEcK EEES {0.00
May OB 05 12:14p 303 p. eT'-
ll
AppLrcAnoN wrLL Nor Be AccEprED rF rNconpLErer,:f ,"J:ifI:" @fOOl)t -. r, .rTr.&i+inrt*p.ciioi,;t-
d
mWN0FUl N(TPERMIT
75 S. Fronlage
Vaal, Colorido 8't
COINTRACTOR INFORMATIOI.I
!'ALUATIONS FOR PERMIT Labor & Materials
Fot Parcel ll C
rTTfrTT"'T''QROUTING TNFORMATTON FOR OFFICE USE ON
Gcne/al Conlractor:To$rtt of l'.cal R*9. lo-:Gonerct atrd Phone lr4s:
ATTEHTION; J\ CHr\RLtE, (:R[,c, DORTS
REVISED AMOUNT: S oTl-lER;s c)
PLUMBING: S (]'REVISEDToTAL: S O
;rrcel # Con_f_a_cl €aE e Coualy.llssessors Olfict at gTO-J.zB-B6d;O or visil wvtv!.eaqle.wunlv.
2t0tof zJgPl
Job Ntsme: Llh*"/l /e JobAddrcs5: fr? 6rr" G*l_1..
yW"itl.t 'no"",f7o.,tfl .otlz
enonet//p. r2.+fr5
R EAsoN ron neus.rorrfs---7-
1i.n; ,**l f,"l f ,,*L; fu 7l;,9-
.jqBq
PlJDnet
c:vindftyt\Dci&rot\DFLORE$ lNFOHBvigs Btdg pemildes
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
OI'INER IJIGHTHAIIJ, DIANE GAMEL
5293 W OBERIJIN DR
DE\IVER
co 80235
APPI,ICANT DEMARK EIJECTRIC COMPAI{Y
5902 EAST 53RD PI.ACE
COMMERCE CITY
co 80022
License:350-E
CONTRACTOR DEMARK EIJECTRIC COMPANY
5902 EAST 53RD PLACE
COMMERCE CITY
co 80022
License: 350-E
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Job Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
Location.....: 483 GORE CREEK DR, UNIT #8
Parcel No...: 210108235001
Project No , Pd o( - o++E
Permit #: E05-0126
$pg- oot/
ISSUED
07t0u2w5
07tryzws
OuMt2m6
o? / 0L/2oos Phone: 303-985-4984
07 / 0t/2o0s Phone z 72O-329-146-
07 / 0!/2005 Phone: 720-329-L46-
Desciption: NEWDORMER/ADDITION
Valuation: $700.00 Square feet:
{r*1t{.**d.*rt'||**:t'}**'t{.,ltara'l**,t'****'t't:l**'t*rrtttt{.{.,i:t**t*:tt*'}:t***'t't*r!trt rt,t*'} FEE suMMARy
Elechical----- >
DRB Fee----- >
Investigation-- >
will cdl-------- >
TOTAL FEES- >
t44
s0. 00
$0. 00
$3.00
ss4.75
$s4,7s
$0. 00
$s4 . ?5
$s4 . ?s
$0.00
Total Calculat€d Fe€s- >
Additional Fe€s------..- >
Totsl Permit Fee----- >
Paymenls---------- >
BALANCE DUE-----. >
Approvals:
Item: 06000 EITECTRICAL DEPARTMBIT
o7/os/2oo5 Js
IIEm: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
Action: AP
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
(BI.,DG.): FIEI.ID I}ISPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO EHECK FOR CODE COMPIJIANCE.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot
plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply
with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and zuMivision codes, design
review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
REQITESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOT RS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OLJR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4
R FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
i**tlllllltltlftalltffaa+fafaaatafta*allltlt*lflttra*{r*'}'t't'}'}l'**a'}*'}*****aatttr*ftftaffff*ttf
TOWNOFVAIL, @IORADO Stat@|ltlll*llllltf*aaaalaaaaaaaaaaaa*+aaaaaaaatlt*+**lffaa'.laaaaaa*a*ta*aaa*a****l'laltaaaaa*aaaaaa*
Etatement l{\rfliber ! R05000103 3 Amount :
Payment Method: Check
Buildere / ck *10250
$s4.7s o7 /LL/2OO'L1 :3? ArYlInit I LrTNotation: Rrturc
Perrnit No:
Parc€I No:
Site Addreee:
Location!
r.lris Pa]rnEnt !
EP 00100003111100
wc 00100003112800
2101-082-3500- 1
483 GORB CREEI( DR VAIII{83 GIORE CREEK DR, T'NIT #8
ss4 .7s
Tlpe: EIJECTRICAIJ PBRUfT
Total Fees :
Total ALL PmtE !' Balamce:
805-0126
$s{.7s
$s4.7s
$0.00fat*fttftaa'lltlf*tflaalat+a*aaaaaal**tafat*a**'}f**+r**tt+*tl*'t****'lt*f+{'*'lfl+**++lt'l***tt'}*l
AC@IJNT ITEMLIST:
Accormt Code DescrJ-pt.iorr Current Pmta
EIJECTRTEEIJ PER!{IT FEES
HII,L EELL INSPEEIION EEE
51.75
3 .00
APPUCATION WILL NOT BE ACCEP'TED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED
Project #. 2 J o I ogz3-<- oo)
Building Permit #: [a- o.f- OorT
Electrical Permit #: _
970-479-2119
mvtlwYAn
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Golorado 81657
0q$E
(O5.otLd ffimJUN2e 200b
CONTRACTOR IN FORJIIATION ,3GO - E
COMPTETE SQ. FEET FOR NEW BUILDS and VALUATIONS FOR ALt OTHERS (labor & l,labrials)
Electrical Conbactor:
D c-a4o ",( Ft e'!4;" 4,*
Town ofVail Reg. No.:
360-E
Contact Person and Phone #'s:
N,o tK B$o"s 72-o-32?-ly 6t
E-Mail Address:Fax#:
ConlRctor Signalure:d)-h;J 4,Gld.4
AMOUNT OF SQ Fr rN STRUCTURE: | .l tl sry + ll eucrnrcnr- vALUArroN: $ 7 oc s
at 970-328-8ffi0 or fur Patel #
Parcel #*/o l 'Otr^ - 3€o o-t
robNamer /,)Xrk"l( Cr.Jo.'&o#*fr" -e a.-T>"- ua,iJg
Legal Descrlption Lot:Block:Flllng:Subdivision:
ownersST:t^ o Li*rL*Ao.\t IAddress:52?< t/-.obett.-^ D- ]Phone: 3ot-?a--r-.l7sE
Engineer:Mdress: o o^.zt,,u 69oLx- ll Phone:t.o-
Detailed descripUon of work:K. .o**q E t ..rb" rl*l
Z ,'"Ak e -'."/
w,"..i5 *o
tt^*Jels
QC c,., -roJn{?-+l-* R e,^oJ el, q DA
WorkClass: Ne,ar() Artdition( ) Remodel(V/nepair( ) TempPower( ) Other( )
Work Type: Interior ( yf b<terior ( ) Both ( )Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No X
Typeof Bldg.: Singlefamily( ) Duplex( ) Mufti-family(v,/Commercial ( ) Refiurant( ) Ofter( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Unib in this building: V No. of AccommodaUon Units in this building: I
Is this permit for a hot h.rb: Yes ( ) No (k)
DoesaFireAlarmExlst: Yes(R No( ) [floesaFireSprinklerSystemExish Yes( ) No( )
a
******:r***** *t$(*********************FoR oFFICE USE ONLY***r********************!.*******'t****
F:t.Iev\BI.JII,DING\APPUCATIONS\GLECPT*z*s.*" Nggd @' <-
*g;M*4
5N
Amendment to the 1999 N.E.C. Town of Vail Ordinance 10-1-6.
o Overhead services are not allowed in the Town of Vail.o Underground services have to be in conduit (PVC) from the transformer to the electric meter, main disconnect
switch and to the first electrical distribution circuit breaker panel.o The main disconnect switch shall be located next to the meter on the exterior wall of the sfucture easily
accessible.o All underground conduits are required to be inspected before back-filling the Fench.o In multi-family dwelling units, no electical wiring or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common
walls and spaces are accepted.o NM Cable (Romex) is not allowed in commercial buildings or structures exceeding three (3) stories.a No use of aluminum wire smaller than size #8 will be permitted with the Town of Vail.
TOWN OFVAIL ELECTRICAT PERITIIT GUIDELINES
o All installaUons of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approval from planning. This application will
not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable).
o If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over
30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit.
o If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on any existing deck or elevated platform,
a structural engineer must review the existing condition and veriry that it will suppoft the added
concentrated load, Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped letter or drawing
with this application.
o If this is a remodel in a multi-family building with a homeowners association, a letter of permission
from the association is required.
o If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required.
I have rcad and understand the above.
6-z-?- es-
' Signature Date Signed
If you have any questions regarding the above information or have additional questions,
please contact the Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at97O-479-2L47. The inspectof can be
reached on Tuesday, Thurcday and Friday mornings between the hourc of 8am and 9am. You
'|nay also leave a voice mail and the inspector will call you back.
t ', ' J:
F :\cdev\du ILDING\AiP UCetmNbiercCpERM2005. DOC
11. .
FAX
RE: Corfiaddsdbrr*detsfl.
Af fte ddgs b€em rc*nfucement, the conbactor has l€qu€sbd to instatr lhe (4)-lA LV.L. d| tfte sarne side
of lho gkdam ddge b€dn, du6 io spc enit'tims of irxfatrng on tho umH|rtod side of tE .idgp.
That aagged (bf b nd rlrucfira0y adequac, End the additional LWs n€€d to r€rnain on bofir sides of
the rilge as ciirdy d€stned !*ve, a a cddr*ds *nr6, the tuo LVI-b sr tre u&trted ib
of the ddgF tnat be $o|bd r? b 2 ft qr edr eld dtE rilsB TIE tF L\rl-b dr ttp |lmodebd S d l|e
ridgo b€arn shal sfl f*y be*m sfrd psdcs h fis arbbt*.
Ple6ecat rr,ffi any qlestims oroomments.
Thank yon,
WlkensErg'rcedp, f.LC
Ch.btMl(cns, P.E.
6S
'F!
o4
:t/t,
70N
l.'
sr0
r[\
PCI 80(6681 Ayu|, @lordo 8l@O plr S7O.37E /1828 f. Sm8a5.6324 flrffitrffiE@t d.n€r
O7-21-?0fl5 tnspecfion Request Reportlng Page 10
4:47 pm vail*cO - Clry Ol -
Reguested In3p€ct Dab: Frlday, July 22,20Os
Inspecton fu|ai CG
Slte Address: 483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
483 GORE CREEK DR. UNIT 6
A,IID lnformatl,on
Actlvltv: B(F0O17 Tvoe: A-MF SublVoe: AMF StrtG: ISSUEDCorstTyrrS: Occupah'cy: l3e: V-B InspAr.a: CG
Onrier: LIGHTIIALL. DIANE C'AMEL Phon€: 30398$49&4
ADplhrni: Future BulHers Inc. Phone: (303) 93$8?fi1Co'nbrctor: FL r.|Io Bulb€Is lm. Pfione: (3o(]l 93]8?(x)oFcrrprbn: NE_!V_EQ|E![ER/4]q|IOITOROOFANDTTASTERTERRACE.NEWWT.|DOVISONT.TORTHSTDEComINer* RC'TJTED TO CHR]S GI,NIOI.I. ELISABETH ECKEI, FIRE AhID PTJBLIC VI,ORKS. JSUTHERComrnent .ppfoy€d bt pbnnlm and r€turn€d !o Chrb, OZ2g05 - EECKEL
Com|mnt: BULDIIT|G PLAN REVIEWCOmTENTS FAXEEIMAILED 3&(F. COttilIENTS lN:
F:Kd6rcHRF\PERIffT.COTIMEMTS\BO$OO17.DOC. COT,MENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TC}
lSSt AtlCE OF Bt lLD|tlc PERHIT. - CGUNFN
Comrnent ros0orr3a to cor nents submltbd aftl ror ad lo chrb (runbn - JSUTHER
Comment r.yls.d plaffi.pp.orr€d 32t /O4 - CGUMON
Comma : STRI,CTT,RAL'REVISIONS SUBMITTED AND ROUTED TO CHRIS GUMON AND ELISABETH ECXEL -
JSUTHER
Comrnent neluost Dlans flm bv Dhnnlno 0tog06 EE - EECKEL
Comm€nt: .cvhed b2.1 $eet 6ppfowds-16.O6. s€e thls updated sho.t at hana lnsp.cflon. - CGIJtfiON
Requesredrnspecdon(sr DttT*0t fi? 5/Y#/ *r/q
tbm: 60 BlDcsheetrock Nrlt Requested Tlme: 02:00 Pil "
Requesbr: E{R RE zuILDERS, INC Phon€: A)}q}1€SX}
CofinrEils:1'AM ,Asslgn€dTo:'€qlvs _ EnbredBy: DGOIDEN K'Adlnn: The Exo:com,ncnt KIrcEEFSGFTT oNLY
De) ft"
D**h
lnspecdon H|story
Item: ?26 FIRE DEPT. NOflFICAI]ONllem: 10 BLDC'-Footln$/Ste€llbm: 20 BlDc+oundatbrvsloellbm: 1) ELDG'Frsm|no * ADorov€d "
05/1216 -lnspeclor: JRM' Actbn: Pl PARTIAL INSPECIION
Comrr|3'It STEEL BEAM INSTALTEDOdlgtIS lnsD€ctor: JRM Acllon: Pl PAR]]AL INSPECTION
Comment GLU LAII KIrcHEN SOFFIT APPROVED
Actlon: AP APPROVED
Acilon: APAPPROVED
O7l12lOS InsD€clor: GCD Acllon: CR CORRECnON REOUIRED
Comment: I . ,l 5 1/2 tVL REOO AT l/l/EST SID€ OF EATH PER OETAIL 3S2.1.
z.HEADER, CUTTVL NEAR SAME LOCATIOf.IAS'1 ABOVE.
o|(TOINSULAIE.
07/15/06 Insg€c,tor: cdayls
Comment: CoirgcdonsOomp{et.
llem: 5() BlDC'-lmuhllon " Alixov€d "
07/1StF Inrp€dor: cdsits
ComnBnt
REPT131 Run Id: 34t39
Tz:2t7005-- W -------Faserl-
4'.47 om vrtt ea'- erv oi
Aclion: Pl PARTIAL INSPECIION
Item:
ftem:
Item:
Item:
tb/19/05 Inspoctor: JRM
Comment: KITCHEN SOFFIT ONLY
70 BLDG-Mlsc.
90 BLDG-Flnsl
22 PLAN-ILC Slto Plan
533 PI.AN.IEMP, C/O
REPTl31 Run 3439
RcqucCbd InT.otDrb: Thursd.y, Scpt mbor 15. AXrs' Inrpec{dr Arct: CG9bAddrusr at3 @RE CREEX ORVAL
rr&t CORE CREEK DFU UN|T$
aco.hffih
Aafv|MCordTyli:Orihn
Amnc.r*cdrbrdfi
D.octfiloi:Coflin nt
ConrnfitCofirmil
Cofirtlnt
Conn|nU
Comm.|*
Coil[tt.t
Cocumnl:
esl|ht.Eltcfled$
wl2/SComilntwt9'6Cormn*
07t12tg,CofiItrnt
EOFA,ILDINGbcommdr$l
Pho
Pho
sccms€a00
tSsr.EDco
stoEoi.tNoRltl
JSUFGR
n nill9hl|tf,E bvgbrr*u(El8g6 EE - EECKEL
nt h.d Sz.t |tr.l itip|of,dEl6'dt. r.. |hh up&bd eh.ci at fiam. Inip.cton. - cGthK)N
. coiltffiNGltil:
COUtI€rrfTs MullT BE ADDRESSED FrcR TC,
b chrb gunlon - JStfilER
A}TD ROT,IED TO C}Nls 6UT{OTII AND ETJSAAEDI ICKEL .
Ac{on: APAPFROVED
Acdon: APAFPROVED
Acdon: Pl PARIIAL lMlPECTlOll
07/1i/tl6 [Ie.cbr:Co.m.nt C.*tremtbn: 60 BtDo.[nlf0on
07/'14,05 In$.dor:
ConurrilI
fbm: 6O BtDOSlt .Soct}|S "ADprorrod"'E-IS/S lnrp.cbr: JRtl
Actlon: Pl PARTlll' INSPECIKTN
REPT131 Bun Id: 3627
Codh|I.d:
Comna|*Conm.dt KITCIEN SOFFIT O,iLY
O7nrzffi Insp.cb.: SF|A,llN Aclbn: APAPPfiTOVEDColr*n.d: EEDROOM DRYWALL APPROVED.llm: 70 8LD$lff|c.tt m: gl BLDGFlnalllrm: 22 PI"AMLC S!| Planfbm: 503 Ptfl$fElF.C/O
\,i ;)
t i ''
"ti ,
{l l\:vrt. !\[' i^ ,'] ,.
'-'*t h,'i
,\ \
u
t\ \'h
u t,,r
i,
REPT131 Run Id: 3627
270 z-101 ' bqql
'ni"ot19
8,zf#o |nrryfi.l8uE* n8f'orttns eagc tg
Arf$fn EO5O|26 I!pr: &ELEC SubTvn: AlrF €lrtn APPROI,EDcot*Tyri: Occupriftrc (tc: ln|DAr|.: 8llOwtic LJGlfTllA,lL.DU,rGc fEL - Ptpm: flI3€8${S4ADglc|nt DEITAR(ELECIRICCOIIPAIIY Phonc: ?Zt}<}l€lCohhrcbn DElr ,RI(ELECTRTCOilPAI|Y Pftor: 72o-fil9u6lD.sblbn: t€WmRr/ERADOfi|(XlCocinil RCT.'TED TO JOE STITTGR . LCATFEELL
Ersls|Jo,$f,crril fuz/' A.=''ct u( P
S/4,1,
lEm: 120 El-Fcfiough R.q|'nsEdThc: l[r0OAXR.ssG DEt R(EI.ECTRTCOMPANY Ptbm: ttBdx€
cq'rnq6 a4 ltlrtFy|orp.flrrftd t8
A|d9nld.ro: SilAt|l _ EilndBf oootDEN K- Actofi ilnoExp:
AEDIo@rgeo
ibm: lq! ELEGFImI
R.$rcbd lilp.ct 9rbr laonfiy, July !1, m05- lolo.c{on Arsl SHstl Addrur: 4t3 @RE CREEK OR VAIL
it8:l 6ORE CREEK DR, UNIT t
nlLOvrtUl(-r , = /
l, l- l<--'" q (-'' I r-"-e
- ARc f A,Lt w'tt r" - .\ cn- ,/ t /t- +Et hf n Q aota,f ar l- lPft.t',
D,srr^ O-llcl9't-
^ r 1 ',; /rt ri I 11 I /At\ l"r /tl , r
,,'^'r *' ,'
NEPT131 Run Id: 3{03
rv
AtrlD lnfbrmafron
Acllrdty: E0$0126
CondTypi:
Ownsr:
ApplhantCohhclor:
D.icriplbor NEWDOICommnt ROtttED
Recuested Insoecfl ontsl
Requested Inspect Date:
lngoec0on Area:. Slte Address:
Tlne: &ELEC
Occuoaircv:
GAMEL
Thursday, Septemb€r 15, 2005
SH
483 GORE CREEK OR VAIL
483 GCRE CREEK DR. UNTT F
SubDfe: AilF
us€:
Phon€: 30$9854984
Phonc: 1X!3291{61Phots: 72O,32!)-1.{51
Status: ISSUEDlnsp66.' t"
Reouested Tlme: 08:30 Alf' Ptrone: t3O3) 90l€96'
EnlsredBy: DGOTDEN K
JO€ SUTFIER - LCAMPEELL
'!,
-- ltem:
Reque$oc
Asslgnrd To:A&n:
190 ELEe-Flnal
Futre R,rll&rs
sl-rAHil
Time Exp:
Ftu,rL frYTnuna
>+-) Id*t*t
tllrlol
lnsoec{on Hlstorv
ftem: 110 ELEC-Teme. Pouor
Item: 120 ELEC-Rough - Approved "
07t1U06 l[|3!€dor: sfEhir- Actton: APAPPROVEDComnant arclbrd prol€cflon wil be lequired for bedroom at llnallbm: 13O ELEC€ondun
Item: 14O ELEC-Hbc.
It m:. 190 ELEC-F|n l
REPTl31 Run Id:'3627
-..'TH.S,tfft+.Urur,*
6Lw.cK*staal
ffiffi,wg.n#gsffihH'r.flffi,ffi
ftr700.00
L$.eg
ffi ffii*'tf.Fi#ffi,gP?g*drsH'-+lunere,"4,ilffiq,?iff'-ril.ffi k*H{HLffi 'HFSlffiHF-,ffi ffi"Hgirgu*+"H'*Ea3.mffi'Ehtr-Fiff ffi +aUtcrbAuE6lffi fi fffi,g1ffi mnt"ff Etff fl ff''**mfF,ffnt|sog o nd h csdtilreffiE5ffib;
ffim
nlt* Aft S ffid-*{ffi prearacr crlu oueuor ucer &nt rmi! rr! Drdrr!! r$!! F
P.?
EIaOD.BATE TiIlilFEr-I
UFttg,OfA lldnovffiyf AE|5+rrrEtt1.
P,02
Boor
bla@o- FRo&6
ffiffitr
- WfElAg. 6c Dnr!.u, tr ab||.*rt rr r:r- ---rtu o ;mf. ;ffi *ffifif.ffi rh lu{rroar or 6r
;r'
. ||fiiqvRrEq
t. lsnrye& ec! *tftS&4to{&
1 ndlnIqtd$aslrpbtotea
nrrt
!trr00,00
.* * Hi,ffiHffil e rmdrkrroodrtccponftrs-"trrevurq .* .o's!turr, rtr mroqpcr
l.
nnn-ail;i3l'6ij$irr
.-FtEr--
ffiffi#ffitr#
mlwff ffi mffi ffi'f ,',H"r,H'g-mfu x'"w
lffitrffisffis##?ffileffi#*
*mffitr"
4. ltetoarrub:trffiffiffiaia,ro*F''frffiilgSla.u'ncrrai&,H"ffi5.mH$ffi trffiffi
leaer Try Bra r'!o - *',il'k*n
.q{.
"*r.-ti"#ffiiffi"*ffiP.ffiHffig. be rrur&rr G,os o's ,o ur!.
. Dcd d,r{ry !!d$l't|!t6crr *ijg11,
- ,,uffiRE:,$El a.idftU Utr su rroo Er*sD,rrr *l P'o P,04
loor
sultroFrGrm ))e,(9lUt*trW tIEt !o+2
ro'h*lgD'{r...e.o'rorrrrmt,or rcr,*dsdt*nu ,ofrvo,x'+ tfir,ltrCrtbbEdqEFE!.
"ffi*'ffim#,
stAtltotootftdDo , .
Cgt$ttTOFEAC'" lrt
n 4qt'q: Drr,i*le hrgrtilr J" rr rqrfllCtrrt tdtr
lfillryfildeftttrEu.
rqt.il4r.Saqtots AUiJt/,r t. I fi (,
D-_, ly
tlt||t|lngt|rt.d,dldd|eI.
xtsrEht8r+tE|_.._rr
qr rhb
-
ot gf
}1AR:8-95 IED 15125 P,02
J.LViria Coo:tuoti{:r, l;ic.
l(t00 S. Fronags Rord Wcst, Sritc 36?
V:ril, l.rrhnda t1L{7
Tclc!O3. 476. 3082
Frx 303. {76, 3425
March E, 1995
Mr. Jim Cumutl€
Toun ofVail
Dopartmcnt of Communiry Dcvelopnent
75 S. Frontage Rd,
Vail, CO 81657
RE: 'lhnin Rcsidcncc
T.C.O. Requirements
DcuJim.
'
Ps'r ow discussion today, be adviscd that rvs will not be using any bulbs in thc
exterior fixlrues exceeding 40 watts. We also acknon{edge thc Lighting Ordinance
u'hich allows us a total of 3 exterior.fixtups on the builcing. We undcrsand that more
lighting may he added through s.variatrce Frocess.
Alsr'r, irt regalr.I tq thctr$,lJlltEi4gBkg ttiiitruretr[ prcviou"-ly snbmilted, rrp have
rcvised il pcr our discussion today and r.rc rcsubmirting it rvitlr this correspourlclce for
your rcview and approl'al.
Regnrding the stairs offthe back dcck, ui: nill shrrrten thc run so that thc stairs do
ruol s{uss ovcr iato town prctpr'{rty. A reviscd I.L.C. can be providcd if necessury.
The l)eveloFrnent Imorovcmcnt AgreemEryt hrc trccn corrccicd per our discussien
today. Rick Roscn will be laxing it to our office tlils aftcrnoon. $v'e rvill hsvc the 'lbqi! s
sign olf on the document and rehun it to your ollice rtith the bond amourt.
lVe believp we have satisfied all thc 'lbrvn s requirernents for releasing a T.C.O.
inspection. \Ve would likc rhis inspectitrn to occur as soon ru possible, as we are teady.
Please call us at 476-3082 rvith arry questions or coornents. Tharrk you in odvoncc for
yoru cooperstion,
Project lvlanagcr
cc: Jobn & Canr:en Thain
Rick Rosen
L),nn Fritzlen
ilAR- 8-95 UED 15:28 o P, 03
$530.00
$300.00
$45.00
$50,00
$155.00
$130.00
s200.00
l.LVieto eo;sirustien, tnc.
l x'S. Fmnagc ltned lfert, Suirr 201
tfiil Colrrrrdo 81657
Tclc303, 476, 3003
Frr 303. 476. 3423
March 7, 1995
THAIN RFJ,SIDE}{CE;
r,A\rnsc^ PFlltrr$
r Sod all disturbcd lawn arcns on Lots 8 & 9
* Revegitatc all othe.r disturbcd lnwn arrras (adjacerrt to construction)
with material to match pre-existing
r Provido 3 - livc galloo Rcdtwig Dogwooil.shrubs bctwocn cxisling Blue sprucc Trces
t Provide 10- oae galloa Clinratis Vine at perirnercr of deck
I Provldc amual flo$'cts at all tlower boxcs (@ deck
t Reinstall bouldcns @ Association prope$y
r Conlraot with profcssional "Arborist'r to consult about
"surv.lvablllty" of exisling tr€cs o! site
r Deok skirting (u'est side only)$29.p*00lOTAL: $1,700,00
+ue\'@4alm
..i=26-95 THU i?r29 Dnx
FITZ & GAYTORD LANDSCAPINGT INC'
Iandrcapingr trrlSatlon & malntenanqeP.o. 80X 1315VAI!' OO 81658
303-4?6-31?9
TIIATN R,ESIDENCE
I/ANDECAPE PROPOSAL-L / 23 / I 5
snD-?, 404 sQ. f,'T. Cf . 22
Pf,ANt XATERIAI,T
3-5 GAL. REDTWIG DOGWOOD OE15.OO10-1 CaL. CLII(ATIS VINE e$5.00
UISCELLANEOUS LASOR AND EOUIPHENT:2 HRS. OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT e$65.00/HR. TO
AND SPREAD TOF SOIL
EO HRS, IIANUAIJ I',ABOR TO CIJEAN-UP, SPREAD
TUNE AND PIIUNE TREES E$24.001 rroADS OI' TOP SOIL e$1?5.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
MOVE AND PLACE
TOP SOIL, PREP
528 ,88
45.00
50 .00
BOUTDERS
130,00
AND FINE,t90.00
r75.00
41. {oe. qs
P, 02
ilAR-13-95 l'l0N 14:35
l.L.Viu'!c Constnlct!'on. Inc.
luj(r s. lTontqgc l{oad Y/cst, Suire 202
Vril, ColonCo Bl(57
Ttlc303.4?5. 30E2
Fax 303. 476. 342t
Mrwh 13, 1995
Jim Cumutta
Toqn ofVail
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
Dear lim,
Based on today's couveniation bctween Mars Churchill arrd,vourscll', I undcrstand
thut sdditiorud comrrrit:mcnts must be made in ordcr lbr the Town to acoept the Thain's
Dcvcloper lrnprcverncnt Agreenent (DIA)' I am aware that the $800'00 cost R)r thc
spiral siaircasi, iOentifred is the DIA, is of concern to the To*n because it only in0ludes
tlie cost of reiostalting lhs sluircsse, t*'hich is in our possc'rsion, and not thc cost ils'rlf'
Although we rion't belicve that is likely, rvc arc awiue that if rhe Thains should default on
rhelr agreement ro insriill the improvctnenls ideutitied in the DlA, and take the existing
stairsasc with them, thc lbwn will not have sufficient fupds to conrplete thc
improvements on the Thain prDperty.
I realize that thc'lbwn could simply rcquire a new DIA and escrow check, which
iucludes the value of the staircaso, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
OcCulranoy (ICO) lor the Thain rcsidenoo. Ilo*'cvcr, sincc wc wish trr rrbtain a TCO
today, I would request that yt:u accept the tbllowing comrnitment fton my cqppany.
J.L. Viclc construcrion, Inc. agrccs that if the'lhains should dcihult on their
agreem€ut to install the stairpase on the building by Jul)' lst, 1995, my courpany will
work with the Toru to complete the irnprovements, nccording to thc procees outliuod in
thc DIA, for a total cost n(it to exceed $800,00. Furiher, I undcrstrnd tlre finirrar:cial risk
to my company associatcd witlr th.is uururdlrncnt und requc$ that the 'forvn accept tfus
letter, as opposed to requiring a ncw DIA and escrow chcck.
#iJ'
/ ru^"r|.- Vieler
Presidcnt
J.L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
L-1ATE INVI]If,E
t_r3/ !t:r/+J 3?95
DESCT{ IPT I EN94:3 THAIN
3t624
I\JET F'AYI'IENT
31 !5. 00 31 =5. rt,l
;11::5, r:!{:} .J 1::=. {:r(l
J. L. VTELE CONSTRUCTION, lNC.
l OOO SOUTH FRONTAGE FOAD WESI SUTIE 202
vArL. co 816s7
PH. 303476€082
COMMUNTTY FIRST STATE BANK
vAlL co 81657_ 82.25611021- .a-hcf o[-w-gAe76
3L624
OATE AMOUNT
/ r,^/
AKU't .f !.
,*r[cnoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
PERMIT NUM OJECT 479-2138,
DATE
READY FOR INSPECT
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER -7ah 2-
es-.)wED.4 THUR ^rq t
ER OF
BUILDING:
\
F)FoolNGS / srEEL
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STE
o
n
o
o
tr
E
n
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
,- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
D
POOL / H, TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWEH
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
tr
n
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
tr APPROVED DISAPPROVED REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
\
TOWN OF VAIL?05 ECTION REQUEST
PERMIT NU
(]AI I FFl
THUR FRI
oerc 1 / J1 f?</toB NAMEtl
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
ruES (.@
BUILDING:
(roorrr.rcs / srEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
N ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATEB
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
o_
E
n
T] FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWEH
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR.l
n " ,'r(ir rti{, I
tr (rNAl-'- .tr FINAL
ED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
-;- 3 t
INSPE CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAILI Ef;5ln0 t'"
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
MON
479-2138
-/l ,i,,r-,oo,, 1 f J^t f?'/o, *o'.
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
(;
BUILDlNG:
d roorrrucs / srEEL\
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
rl
Tl
UMBING:
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
FOUGH / D.W,V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
r_r FOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
o_
T] FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
TI
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
n
tr F|NAI-'O FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
i r- ,'--. F:-'-C- L--l----,
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
INSPECTION:MON
-l
'r' ;JoBNAME rrrA':l fU
CALLER
TUES
| 1,.'t-,\r i i, t,' l. 'i r ('{-h-.I3,-lI l! r / / 7 V t,
.t
IWED j THUR FRI AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTTNgS / SrEEL
PLUMBING
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
r-1 ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
kl l-tl i ) ll.l, C} t
tr
il.rlt t--a ---r- - -
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
M
tr
o
D
tr
ECHANIGAL:
HEATING
O ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT SUPPLY AIB
tr FINAL O FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
D^rE 7* ,; f '/{ rNspEcroR
TFlii^( .''
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
--INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
JOB NAME : i r;i ;
CALLER
"fL l'.J
ON9rlPE
L1
,'@ THUR FRI AM PM
i7.
BUILDING:
.E FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
.- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NA|L|NG tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
T] ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
T] FINAL O FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
KRM CONSULTANTS, lNC.
P.O. Bo( 4572
vArr, coLoMoo 6165E
Gr{ts) 949.939r
tAx (303) 9.9.1577
KRl| COHSULTAHTS, I HC.5€59d915""P. Ot
olEE NO.
CALCUTATED BY
CHECKPD BY
60lt€
/tt'r
I,*st"noN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
' \:/.ii THUR 'GE\'t ) \- '-
,7'"AM (ty i
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR INSP CTION:
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES WED
, T,I JoB
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
b
FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERFRAMING
ROOF & SHEEF
PLYWOOD NAILING C] GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL trItlnl$'tI I il\ C'fty:rLtL]Y r'c't
N FTNAL /LOK|/, €A=lq-7-ra-t n trtNAl
Et€CTR!CAL:+rc! | rryf Tplz-*MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP.tr HEATING
u noucx I O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
Ft
tr SUPPLY AIR
f'l
t: ;[
B FINAL tr FINAL
ffiyes tr tr DISAPPROVED T] REINSPECTION BEQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
,o',, P- 5^?/ rNspEcroR
{t
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
INSPECTIO
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES THUR FHIWED
/,.
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PERMIT NUMB 479-2138
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS
O FRAMING
/ STEEL
FOUNDATI ON / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATER
O GAS PIPING
O POOL / H. TUB
r-'l
l-1
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
-
-
tr FINAL
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING
D INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
tr
tr
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr ROUGH
T] CONDUIT
E FINAL
) neenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
E DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
' //:- l?,,,DAIE .{i/ / J t/',/' 'i |NSPECTOR',//
Gi:I
,*ril"TroN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PEBMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES :READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,_ ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
OL / H. TUB
rLl
MECHANICAL:
D EXHAUST HOODS
D SUPPLY AIR
N FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
oor. t, \-[ 'ti,{
rNspEcroR
rrrilCTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMIT NU
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLER .
BUILDING:
P FOOTTNGS / STEEL.
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr,ROUGH / D,W.V.tr FOUNDATION /,STEE
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
r-r ROOF & SHEER 'r . _." PLYWOOD NAILING -tr GAS PIPING
tr
tr
D
TNSULATION.
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n
D SUPPLY AIR
n
tr EINAL O FINAL
l7l'PPRovED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
*
PERMIT NU OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
TUES.
rr.rs*crroN REQuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
\, /n,
'inr"-t -r*,READY FOR
LOCATION:
/\ ll
t,\--/ |
BW) i /' .\-^
flo--^o. / srEEL fOt' .i Yffl
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
N ROUGH / WATERE FRAMING
r-r FOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING o
E
tr
n
GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
n
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH D
tr
o
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
6INAL FINAL
| / ttrl}-IDPROVED
i6i.rct,o*s,
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
6soE *,"silctoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
aiy'€5/t ,./ioJ
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr
tr
D
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATEBFRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL FINAL
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
E EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
DATE
REAOY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
WED THUR FRI AM@
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
oor, 9- 2C -?f/ rNsPEcroR
,*#"roN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
CT
JOB
ROJEF/P
ltl
IT NUMBER O
t'i r l.l
PERM
DATE
INSPECTION:
NAME
CALLER
MON TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILOING:PL
tr
tr
U
tr
tr
D
tr
D
UMBING:
g FooTTNGS / STEEL UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr FRAMfNG f ' ,= .
rrBooF&SHEER f-O ,/" i)'-
- PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
o
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
B TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr coNoutr tr SUPPLY AIR
tr D
B, FINAL tr FINAL
Lffiveo O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
COBRECTIONS:
t
' '- ', ''.oorc 'l /{ t//
rNSPEcroR
b oo;CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECTaIDATE '
LocArloN:{€
C\, r-)
cnlueR | '1
TUES
l.t-l+
READY FOR INSPECTION:'
t-o I nr.'lt / pvr*l
^,t^,c-{-,-l
\=-*-/
479-2138
BUILDING:' C)f ii ra PLUMEING:
I] UNDERGROUND
O FOUGH / D.W,V.
D ROUGH / WATEB
' L'l -- ,/ L-/ STEEL l -/ ''- I )
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
ON / STEEL
ROOF & SHEEB
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
I] CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
PROVED
CORRECTIONS:
CI DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
"'-E T
F'
/cs
INSPEOTION:
Lt (. 'z
CALLER
NAME
QN i '.yi t /,
rrv#cnoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
TUES WED THUB-- ') prtr
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
,- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NA|L|NG tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION E POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
'1^,., r ll/rt tr FINAL
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE r,'" /-l /f INSPECTOR
,"rt"roN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT 479-2138
1l
i-CALLEB i rit'.: flr../
JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES WED THUR TNL'
irL\
r ,l l
._ i''. Rnl| pM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr
tr
o
TEMP. POWER D HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
''.,'.',{INSPECTOR
rF --
PERMIT NUMBEF OF FROJECT
DATE
11. , r'.
rn#cnoN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
,1 479-2138
,':,, .t)
-----@ PM
;Tt
JOB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES
'' . ,;? ,, t,
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
''1'/;i')
, THUR_./ FRI
t- /- 'y' i
WFD
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING: )
O UNDERGROUND
C] ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr FRAMING
n BOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
V
D
tr
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
!"..T9!Att'
#
-1.
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWEF
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
r't
F FINAL tr FINAL
n APPROVED
)RRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
rl
]Y1
INSPECTOR
*
INSPECTION REQUEST<a TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
/'i ', ,r \.f
OJECTPERMIT NUMBER OF
JOB NAMED^TE /
,,i
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES
t- ,'. .
,o,r/rnun)-. inr
, '*..(: ./ .'r/
IN:TNSPEt PM
,
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMEING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATEB
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,- FOOF & SHEER" PLYWOoD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr F]NAL
-
O FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS: 7-
DATE INSPECTOR
IN
I
SPE
\l
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
,'1,): ' t I t't
JOB NAME
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES
,.\
---------------+ AM 'WED THUR
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMAING:
E UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL D ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING [cns PTPTNG
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tro
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
T] ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr o
tr FINAL O FINAL -
(//
{ /,B6PPRoVED
CORBECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
t
., , '/ ,/
, \ ,\l\ir)u ''
PERMTT NUMBFR OF/ PROJECT
oor,- (-Ll{/q , JoB NAME
lq.
-
t-
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
) 479-2199 ':l't
( i.t tCALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
WED
s
THUR
1-,1
FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
r-1 ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr ]NSULATION O POOL / H, TUB
T] SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr\-\ ;\tr FINAL '.]tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
.h:rEerrruo
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT
D-
E] SUPPLY AIR
o
tr FINAL tr FINAL
).-t7t ffioveo
COR'RECTIONS:
tr OISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
.rr-
*rINSPECTION REQUEST)
PROJECT . /",
/ i l/
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMIT
DATE
,. l
JOB NAME
CALLER
NUMBEH OF
t ?/tj
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPEC THUR FRI
BUILDINQ;--'--
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
/rnnrurrruo ROUGH / WATEB
n ROOF & SHEEB- PLYWOOD NAILING I] GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tro
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELEGTRIGAL:
B TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
T] ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL O FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
PROVED ECTION REQUIRED
|l\leDEryr/,\o /DATE INSPECTOR '
r_-rr.1. :- ---.
(r€o{
*
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMIT NUMqER QF PROJECTl?lt4 u
DATE JOB
READY FOR INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES
LocArloN: l/ (
a 1!,-'
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
E
tr
tr
o
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERprnnrr,rrr.rc
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
o_
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWEF
MEGHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr
rl
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB
r:l
tr FINAL tr FINAL
OVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
t ./.. -'
I /^, ti '
PERMTT NOrlreen-F PRbJEcr -
t
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
JOB NAME
CALLER
TUES \ WED
oor= llj i- j z\
RdAoY FoR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
,,| 1..- (-( r
Mory
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
T] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING o
tr
tr
GAS PIPING
I
N tttsuleroru POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP.
tr ROUGH
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
tr
E
tr
CONDUIT tr
o
o
SUPPLY, AIR
FTNAL *rlt_FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORHECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
tPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
tNs/ t7 '- '-/nJ4/ )t--aJ.t L//'/ r-' --"
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
JOB NAME I'f "i ' ,, t
INSPECTION:
CATLER
MON TUESBEADY FOR
LOCATION:' '1t )r^-
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH i D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
T] TEMP. POWEB O HEATING
C] ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
\FINAL N FINAL
g/SPPROVED
,CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
$.
-INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
PERMIT NU ROJECT , ..' 479-2138
DATE /JOB NAME
INSPECT
CALLER
TUES.READY FOR
LOCATION:
l. ,
N:
BUlLDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
E FOUNDATION / STEEL O ROUGH / D.W.V.
D ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
fr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION -POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
O FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
-
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D FINAL
H lppnoveo
CORRECTIONS: ,
I] DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE _r-. /{INSPECTOR
il ,"#"roN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
PERMIT NUMBER/OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
READY FOB INSPECTION: MO4u-,- tr
LocAroN: i - ' r' --.Aln ,.'l '*" /r- " /)a. -@ '*
479-2138
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
o
tr
o
tr
tr
tr
UMBING:
E FOUNOATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V,
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
,-' ROOF & SHEER
" PLvwooD NAtLING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
D-
T] FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICALT )
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
E HEATING
O ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
T] CONDUIT E SUPPLY AIR
tr
p F|NAL tr FINAL
AppROVEDt z.{ <).r. Lv
/7 at 7:z6lF*OVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE .<.INSPECTOR
58c
CALLER 4zl-,tz
READY FOR
LOCATION:
MON--'f:, Y7,THUR
PERMIT NUMBER O PROJECT
*
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
,- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWooD NAtLtNG
tr INSULATION
-tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr_
tr FINAL
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr
]#,*o,-
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
FINAL FINAL
tr APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED A REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
:r1
INSPECTOR
tNs
a
PE
u)tfER
'/ ./
OF PR9JECT
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138TNPERMI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
(-_ ,
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER' PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
o'
D
o
t
FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
C] ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
C] CONDUIT ,D SUPPLY AIR
B tr
T] FINAL D FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,/oo.,, x//,r :r;' iJ i rNspEcroR
-l
\L/05 ,*rt"roN REeuESr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
3,9 cl5 Yl^- o t ,- 4)(,-3ctiJoBNAME ll)Curr-) i- t.',r-l p,rr€ -
CALLER ,/-ir,r < Cltrrc j'r,ii
TUES wED THUR lrat)-+--JEAnu @)
DATE
INSPECTION:MON
PERMIT NUMBER OF PHOJECT
READY FOR
LOCATION:
B
cl
tr
tr
u
o
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ION / STEEL
EER
NAILING tr GAS PIPING
LATION tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
(r'ruer-
o
o FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP, POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr cSNDUrr
D
tr SUPPLY AIB
n
O F]NAL
PROVED C] DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
IN
a)\
SPECTION REQUE
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES @ THUR
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
FBI AM
TOWN OF VAIL
479-213gPERMIT NUMBER OF PFOJECT
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
C] FOUNDATION / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O FRAMING.tr ROUGH / WATER
,- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWOOD NAILING C] GAS PIPING
o rNsul-arloH
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL/H.TUB
NAIL o
tr
tr
cl
ELEGTBICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
FINAL
t'IECHANICAL:
T] HEATING
tr ROUGH E] EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
o
tl tr FINAL
T] DISAPPROVED CI BEINSPECTION REOUiRT,P.FOVED
CORFrECTIONS:
INSPFCTOR
APR- 3 95 l10N 15:13
q
I
P,01
FA)( TRANSMITTAL
FROMr
J.L. YrELE CONSTRUCTTON, rNC.
1000 S. F,RONTAGE RD. WEST, SUfTE 202vArL, co 91657
(303) 476 - 3082
FAX: 476-3423
DATE;
TO:
COMPA}IY:
FAXNO:
FROM:
STIBJECT:
PROJECTNO:
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLI.JDINC THIS TMNSMIfiAL S}IEET:
COI/I,IENTSIIILBSSAGE /'J,tttb -
PLEA$F CALL 4?6.l0t2IF,YOUFAVE NOT RECEIYFN ALI, PAGES
02DAPR- 3-gb 1'l0N 15: 14,nFR-ss'gs mctH
t-
l- |
C{,OS,,to lltET
7=6 24?9
Folltfi Pl$r Elftt
t r"tpr$,9[o[bu rr Br il o nr D
A Ni$,rh€rrff sf,rotni\tl€Nl
flIECHAIIIGAI
IryTERNATIOIIAT ASEO
l!.trEd{tr
t:t60[rEtrr
JLDl&tGr*rrr
nerrrr( I;31!9;'*l'f,8;lli,iiirr-Eo-rf,r
iii.ii$;F lirilItlTi,t!st :.ei, i :$: rskn
Iffilttrar|+ r,- AFfrrltv. qlaF ri.ra
.ICgrsr ornurrfr tglo
a l5l8-C-Aa,
F, 91
GERTTFfGI'rE br usrrrc
Drg[ f
dfrnu.riy f tFf
Vacuul rt€rler!
4lrr.tltlEh 1 ltrc .
bltr e
(rq|oaDlttic,
x&rlr
trala
KRM coNsuLTANTs, rNc.
P.O. BOX 4572
vArL coLoRADO 81658
t3031s49-9391
FAX 949-1577
RECORD
JoB: TH ArN Pegll",euce-
JOB NUMBER:14o3 -13
D^rE' to/tqfq+
\
il Rn t t MEETING
'fi neseoHse t l ctARlFlcATloN/cHANGE
3t NoMINAL LAMINAIED PoNDeRosA FtNa-pEcKlNg '9ABLE TO SPAN UF TD 1,-O AT 'THE UPPEF- FLOOR,
ADD A W,?*I+ STEEL BEAM B:ET?Jc.'F-,XI THE TilO
BEAMS THAT AEe Apppox rMATrLy r"' 4p4g-f-
srcueoz Ai, ryTl Ut ,,cowrot vrELE c ',9reo-rloN
KRM coNsuLTANTs, tNc.
P.O.80X 4572
vArL coroRADO 81658
t3031949-9391
FAX 949-1677
RECORD
JOe
JOB NUMBER:
ttRFt ttMEETTNG (neseorusr ilcrARtFtcATtoN/cHANGE
3E4AND FLOOR FRAMltlq"
O 3TONE VENEER' UP TO 1I' THICK MAY 3E
THF- trACZ oF THe F|?7PLAC-= FP.Ot'l F,-^OP To c.ElL,Nq.
TH= 3" THtcK -qANDgrcNa HEARIU (tb" ueee) le AL3o
)u- ro 74 guPPDzr=D c\t rH,3 DcuaLE P/+<t'iz LvL
?LcoF- Jcl3T3 9 l'.c",
A tA, THtcK
MAY AL+o 3e
4r?.ANlTE COUNTeeT)?
SUFPOSTEb CN THA
AePutpo ']b
IN THE SITC.I]5N
LVL FLaOp. rJolS.fS.
srcr,reo' klh , _lt, {lrl. rtl ,
,,!-
'KRM coNsulrA"rtl,".
P.O.8()X 4572
vArL coLoRADO 81658
t3031 949-9391
FAX 949-1577
FIELD REPORT
TO!
FE'ITZLEN PIIP<.E BTZINEE!
DATE:
ARRIVE:
DEPART:
rz/ a/ q+
3zoo P.M _
1.
2.
3.
f|oo P.t{r
WEATHER:
ATTENTION:
LYNLI FR I T:ZLEN
PROJECT:
\
JOB NUMBER:
This was a final framing observation of the above referenced project. The following items were noted:
The 5-1/2' LVL skylight headers are only end-nailed into the transfer rafters. These require a
Simpson A35 framing clip at ths inside corner of each header connection.
The upper floor framing near the stairs has a cantilevered steel beam that has been extended
with wood 2x12'sin the web space. Thiscantilev€r extension needstobetied to the 2x12
rim it is supponing with Simpson ti€ plates lTP57 or equivalentl.
Some of the hangers for the double 5-1/2'LVL floor joists at the main floor are still missing.
These have apparently been ordered but not received yet.
Otherwise, framing appears to b€ in substantial conformance with tho structural drawings and
specifications.
COPY TO:
VIF-LF Col.l6TRDcjrlaN
SIGNED:
REVIEVI/EO:
a
KRM coNsulrA"rt".
P.O. BOX 4572
vArL coLoRADO 81058
t3031949-9391
FAX 949-1577
TOi.
FerrzLEN eree.cE BptNee ARRTVE: 3:Oo p.M.
FIELD REPORT
DATE:
DEPART:|zDo F tyt _
WEATHER:
ATTENTION:
LYNLI FR I T:zLEN \
JO8 NUMBER:
This was a final framing observation of the above referenced project. The following items were noted:
The 5-'l/2'LVL skylight headers are onty end-nailed into the transfer rafters. These require a
Simpson A35 framing ctip at the inside corner of each header connection.
The upper floor framing nea. tho stairs has a cantilevered steel beam that has been extended
with wood 2x12's in the web space. This cantilever extension needs to bo tied to the 2x12
rim it is supporting with Simpson tie plates lTP57 or equivalentl'
Some of the hangers for the double 5-1/2' LVL floor joists at the main floor are still missing.
These havs appa.ently been ordeted but not received yet.
Otherwise, framing appears to be in substantial conformance with ths structural drawings and
specifications.
1.
2.
3.
-{O.-
c)SIGNED:
RE\IIE\A'ED:
a
ANTS, INC.t3031949-9391
FAX 949-1577
KRM coNsulr
P.O. BOX 4572
vArL coLoRADO 81658
RECORD
'ot' '.rHo,N E-=*'o=^lcE-
JOB NUMBER:q+ 0 3-l)
t rRFr t r MEETTNG (neseonse tlcLARlFtcATloN/cHANGE
€E4OND FLooR FRAMll.16r"
groNE yENEER up To ;r' tHtcK MAY BE APPLIED To
THtACZ OF THE FIEEPLACE FEOU FIPOP TO 4EIL'N4.
rHE 3't THteK SANDsroNa HEARlru (b" >er_n) ls ALao
OA To Be AUPPoRfED CN THi= DoUBLE lt/+<i'lz LVL
FLooP, JolsTs @ lb".
A th' THIcK qpANtrE couNTEeroP lN THE talr4HEN
MAY AL+O B;A.
^U?POST:ED
ON THq- LVL FLOOP JOIS'TS'
=-=-$,.\$i-+e,
%ff
KRM coNsuLTANTs, tNc.
P.O. BOX 4572
vArL coLoRADO 8t6s8
t3031949-9391
FAX 949'1577
RECORD
TH AtN Pestbrllce
JOB NUMEER:14o 3 - 13
I t RFt t t MEETTNG
'fi neseoruse t t cLARlFlcATloN/cHANGE
\
3t NoMtNAL LAMINAIED FoNDeRosA FtNe-DEcKlNq 19
ASLE TO SPAN UF TD 1,-O AT -THE UFFEF- FLOOR.
AoD A W lz xl+ 6T eeL BaAM B:erupa.l THe TteJo
BEAM9 THAT ARe AppeoxtMATELy lzt 4p4Ei--
JO8:
coPYTo' v t EuE r^sgr eo-tfoN
trPITZLEN PIEEAE BEINER.
i-i=
f -.:: -:---j,'1J-\-
..,j'.l{S
srcNEo,z V. 4/fl Ul o
+
ca cn
.{' i-r I
I
I
lur
,Ft<to
I
I
llg
IFt<
IFl.tz
t=
l2
.s
I
cn
I
FTts
z
EHr?
IH
t3
I
I
I
I
I
I
t_,,
to
IE
\'o\
I
(\
I
v
z
F
z
lr
UJo
=I
ot!
lto
IIJtr
F
zo
U'
\,i
tt
F
ru€
R
sEI
B
s<\
otc6
ottoo
o,c
E
dI
E
o:=trf
do
o
cl6
3
.9
nt
-qtc* 8.9
e3€oc _o6l,r
freE.=6F
i€:3: o.>i:E
aD .v atE!s96;of orEr=
E-g*
€8E'-ooI --F
IEe6 o_-
Eae! -o- or
*:€66d
E5H
dEgo.: or.clag,
o E.9E€€i'i o
EaE
FFe
EE:clo -
EH'E
t
'=
o
co
6
E
o
.s
o€
J
.g
:fo
ttg
io
6
.g
CL
(,
.9E
E(go
o
6
:
qtE
o
CDttg
=o
Joc,
oo
o
e.l
F\
3n
uJult!
==E
uJd
FoF
;e.o3t!ozot-q-
E
8
uJo
J
g,
uJz
uJo
=>E
--d|i tr.t ,S
=6(\l
zz99F^.tq5F9cl'ooz>89l!<o1
o-u 6toFO.ini
zl
.. >l
llJ
llJ
uJzo
ts
llJ
o.
J
z
9
Eoo
.q
11
rllqHIHEIFl
d
H
JI
<l>l
tr-lol
d
dt
Ht
?':ttl
FlFl
I
I
I
I
.il
=.1
EI
;|
bl
Fl E
txltil
lHlJFI
aol
t€lt>l>
$
oP
l(5tz
Io=
F-]
E
a
zH
ts
L!
=z
coo-t
zlt-{l<l
tsl
zl
hl
I
Fill
D{lHI
ill
HI!nlllIEI
J
3
-s
c.)\o
I
F\.ir
6
F-l
'i
alllI{J
-
d
=
C!
I\or\-t
l'l IrnN
oz
IIJ
!c
l!
z
=oF
HE
Fl
Hz
=tr
gtr
=+E l-Oz
-rO<Fc(J
IJJ <zEt!Fo6
o
J
IG
oIu
ul
oz
@
=
d
tc,(f
@(o
i
uJF
o
9z
tr!
z
oPze
coo
=z
dP
J
(JozE
36-3ot!
t
Eutclto
EgE<cl€sE9Eir
'95EE dtsE 5E! 6tE 9oE iHE ;Iaul
€;
H
F
rse\z/J=
Ig 8tsts
ItlF
U>ooazo
Fo-
utY
UJo
oF
E
E
UJc
]Lo
o-oo
I
uJFoz
E
=OElrlo-zIFofE*,
zoo
uJF
z
z
6J
@
.rt
oz
Fl-r
,z
:i
-)
-t
I
\
I
an
uJ
uJt!
F
=
uJ(L
.$(f) u'rri ..1
t-1\:i '..
IL
uJo
=
t!
rn
ft
Ft
F"l(/!
3J
1
BE!c)
qrE€r8*
-(t
:gE
E'$ab
!F
FE
o)-.sp.cloO,AN (:)
.r, 5cCr
ZEfb
EAr-1oo
PF
E€oo3oooD
o.S
t'=3d
figoo
El
-rt.9e9
!o.
";s, .9
aoE
!
t5
o)
'=
N
:t
3
t-
o
,o)
o
Io
o
an
.2
-c
I
,.o
..o
(!
si,='(!
o. t': (g
'=O(,*ioxoctro6coo6; 9!EXY
E=E
e6Ptr-o
e:5:€f< >=c9d
E sE_E >,gEg
,j; o
.Eos
ti c.Y- (6
0-(! c!
sEE
oP dE*e
H(/,:EE EO 6:
EFE
--CG o'-c; (Dr-E
st:o='
'6>,o (!=
J=EHi e
,3'f e9E qr
.e5g
-o(!
F\o
oC'4{
..<
,':
-t\'
J
o
uJ
UJ
LL
==E
UJ
FoF
>(
z3
z
F
X
z
H
FrF{
.!.:
rJl
FI
tsx
.a
:l
&
.{
!<
=IL
z
tro-
E
UJo
J
sz
UJ
=>(r
-raaftp&
=ao6l
zzoo
F^AXrF9 0
.to7no2rl-<o*
dY>Y
iN
uJ
J
z
E
6
uJl-)
E
a
zY
i
tz
9z
iF
--63fiOI
_lrl(') |ql-l
I
cil
=.1ol
IJJI
3l
H
4
3
I
I
I
.il
=.1(9t
ullGl
JI
al>lt!l
il 3ol ul
L\l(o
c1
I
I<l
.ol
LrJl
cEl
JI
<lilol
zl
=lPI
i-1
x
t
tr
I
.-.1
rtt INl.-.r I
I
Iol
z.l
ol
HI
-rl
<l>I
|rIq
zl
=lolFI
,dH
t-ra
=tr
o\
-<tq
at
:z
;1
v
ts
F
u
'zr-
E
'z,l|-i I<l
tsl
zl
gl'l
t4 l!4 1F{lxl!{lHIxlEIFtlirl I
il
=l4
z,
.{
t-<
L;
=zo
-)
oz.
=tr
dl
F
"F"{
1
IFoJ
l-t
I c.ll\tlll\CI f'-t\r
I\;.rlt
I
<)l
lco
| L^|.:
vl.Dur.El'-rclHd<
J
Ao
4
F{
,4
=tr
EFo
LU)
UJ
E2?
=#)z(r-O
o
z
-
ul
<FE()uJ<zEUJF(aZo
oz
t
=tulo-
ED
t
uJ
o-
:!{EZE<af€839trL
5gFlr
=uJ--E E=c, dtrE =o-E 36I 5tuE XO-f x>t q-
€=
qJ
oF
---
x.--g:tLr
J<J(J{#
ctoU{t
=F{ltl
z..^o
>_zmo
=z=r=
CL tr
za
,'t F:o
f,:(DuJ
nn
(o
I
rl
f-
uJF
U>ooa:zo.F
.L
UJY
uJ
co
\'
.'l
IN
-1:)
oF
F
tr
UI(L
IIo
o-oo
I
uJFoz
UJF
o
F
=E
lrJ
o-zo
F(Jf..EFazoo
txlJ-Euildlng t l-PIumbing ( l-Electrical ( l-E.lectrical [ ]-0ther
Job Narnel Thal$-,Besldence --. ._ Job AddrcEs; 483 VaIl Valley P1..'- JaI1, CO 8165J
Legal Deacriptlon: Lot_Q!!_ Blocklexas TrdFilinSW__,_
owners Name, John & csr.nen rhein ,- Aocrresg, ii.,:fr:i:: ii""frfl;:"
"n.g14-ff6-sl
General Description r
work class: t l-New cx:0-Alteration txxc;Additionat E l-Repair t l-other
Number of Dwelling Uniter _?Number of Accommodation Unitsr
Number and rype of Firepl.acesr Gae Appliances_ Bas Logs-.] wood/pellet_
****xx)t*t***t***t(t**xt**)fi***txIsil* vALuATIoNg ttrrxrtr*,If**rix)r***rt**[*,**r**txxxl*
{ t2 -OTHER:BUILD ING ; $eEE'LrOffi-/f 2
PLUI'{BING, -ffiH -ELECTRICAL;
MECHANICAL:
FOR OFFICE UsE Sfl)tX****x**)trt*t{rtr*f,r**rt*x*xx
deuolltion at exlst
g- rorAL' :tjilE-
* x * * * * * I * * x t t( t * t f t * * * * [ x [ * x x coNTRAcroR I NFoRMAT I oN x x x * * * rr x * I * * * * I x x x x r r x r * r r( *
Town.of Vail Reg, NQ. rBBo
Fhone Nurnber : _4.7G309?,-...-
.Town of Vail Reg. NO.4
Fhone llumbsr r
Town of vail.ReE. N0 .IE:P
Phone Number: '_
ror^rn or vai r Res .' No, LO-T-a:L)Phone Nurnber:
t x x t(**)t * ** xtr )|r t( X * ** )t * * * X t t I Stfr s t *
General Contrastorr Duddy Vlele
Adc,ress; -1000 S. Fron
Electrical Con trsc tor i
Actd reFs i
Plcchanlcal Con t rac tor rAddress:
F s-.--:-r-::..: ri tlt,lJ __.--.__..--__ l l 3.{EbEdI An IPlumbing Contractor:Address! ' -_:'-'
BU I LD I NG PERF4I T FEE TPLUMBINB PERMIT FEE:EUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE:
PLUMBING FLAN CFIECK FEE:
HECHANICAL PLAN CHECK FEE:
CLEAN_UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERHIT FEES;
T4ECHANICAL PERMIT FEE;nsenesl.tarwer D'tl laLL,OTHER TYP FEEs,Dri{:
,r/YpF ! GBoup I So. F-;I- vAIuFfioNuJlfl*j /1-.1 t_'
I r _--1
--
,_.--i i ZONINGI
i gna tuq
. Signaturer| | _-_<._{r F-rarrqsut 5.
BUILDING:
' Attn: Mark Churchill
o
F?
P. 02
f t-f cn Plrrse lrlner ZS64?649.AL 'i'
I
I
I
I
I
'.*"1"
?
?f ..ulh fronbgr ro.d
c.n. oal$tdD !1E8t
tE03t {79-2138 or {?9-21t9 ottlc olcomnu{ty
I
it
I
{
2
I
II
I
I
I
a
J
I
I
TO!
PROUr
DATE,
AUEJECTI
al{l.| ooNlntrclloRs CURnE$!L,yIJ RECIaTERED rr4g $tE$onr o?-vtlL .i
,lSoliil OE VAIIJ PIJELTA WORKS/qOI.$TI'NIIY DE'EI/OPDTENT
t{ARcg 16, 1088
COWSIaUC:IIoN EARKIIJG & IATARfAL STO&AGa
the tdwn ofTo.nvlew OrClnanso.Nc..6. ln _fuLfr plsaee stop by the rdwn of:*l-llllil"l-u:mlg:nr-to ortlr', 'a 'opy. rhank you sqr your.YsJ.. Pu&rclrng DeDarEtrant tcc@paratlon on Utlr nrttar.
I
rn sumnatyr.ordl.narco No. 6 rtates that lt ls uniauful for anvPjr:?.I to rttt.r, lTack or irpostt any Bol,l, rock, sandri debrigo_I' Srterta+r lncludlng trach duurpstere, portEblE toiletl snd$or}aen vohloles upon any etrsat', rtarr;aik; iii"v-oi-nud,rrd--
.pr?gs gr aty portt6n rhsleof. ,i[o risii:;lj;;n-irI-dlii ocvalr FtaB€te and rg+E La approxlnately E ft. 6fl pavimdnt.
3!l?.g'9lnrnoe rtlt ts itrrElrf-iiiioroia uv irri-roi"'ii'iiiiir
lTPl rg wolkc Dep gtncnt . - - Firc6ne-'io[na-vl.3r ifu ne-;ilrl - l-Eiion.Y*ll-!" gtvpn..a- 24 hour trtrtcn nortce to i.nJvii-rild-ilil;ili:rn.tlre ev.cn!, the peison Eaootitl;a-o6ei-not oi'pri-ilrfi lil-'*ll :f_:llb.$. !t :_l 1, 1o9!. fu; -ii."i i iia,' [i" -t6ii.-fr;id"
DeparEnent wt lt rcnwe sald uamirii-iE-id-;6."il-oi-ilileon
1ot-fftr-it1 lhc provLsloni-oc- [hti-oralnancc eiilu-not lrePPrrtrabrc to constnrctlonr Pgintgnlnge g-r repa.lr proJccits o!ahy rtrcct ot rLley or any-utllttleg fn ttre-ilg[E-i:w.V;
r (L.e. contractor,
\
t
;
t
I
,!
I
I
i'trl
I
I
.i
,!. , t''l'I
I
I
I
II
l
i
l'
t
tI
i
tItt.
t
i'
{
II
O arrrzf cn prrro: Erinor )^.,'o"t'
7, sautlt ltcnlrgr rcrd
l.lt.Gdoil&||65?iioil tlc-atgo cr {?9-ll'39
If thls pernii.t requt?€s 1 Toq of Va.{l Fira DaPartnent.Approval ' i
ilsiliilrq' 'i:i;bi ii-lbiisi fiil.i' 0;e'ipbiivai
"
i Pl annln! oepartnrnit
iliiifr-i"-uiiiih-0ed;tiAnl-ievtew, ani' a-reviaw bv th? Bulldlns :
b#ii"iit,-iili"eiiirnitda imi.rtn-a total revlew iuy trke as l0n9 :
as'tbreg rietE, i
Allcomrncrcl,rl(largrorsmoI!}andallnru]ti-fanrtlyperm|tawl.ll
havc to follow tle rbove nentloned maxlmun riquiidtnii. ..Rtsldentlil
and 6ml 1 proJects srriuio'iiiii-i"iiii-inbfii:oi -
tliii- H:l:::,t'I;ff.#: ;ffiid'Tli;1"i"'Jili"i'iiri,;i-6i liil; ttor'rever' .r'r
T' Il'lfrr ii-r-iroiEiir-tmpici ttri vtrious above mentlonrd'
',_94 1gE lbrt4
I
cfllcr cl oomnualtt
BUILDIi{G PERI{IT ISSUANCE TII4E FMI'iE
'l
llii tl,iiiil T' il'ifi t ii-'-iioiEiir- tfrpic i tqr! d1! 111 IPY:-$ nl!...n'd
l;p,i;tilii ritt.igilo" to- nei*riiy rcvt ew, rhesa pnJects nry
aibo tare the three-week Perfod''
f,very.attemPt wtll be [99€ by thls depantnent to expedlte thls
pemtt aq lQon ts PoislDl€.
Ir the under$igned, urlderstand the Plan check Procedure and t'lme
frame.
r
€5fR5-trlrned Into06to $0r
DeveloFnent DrPartnent.
o
J'r.rne 3(rr L99r+
'fawn ,rf Va i I
Tha' lrncJersiEned, as secr"etar.y c,f ttre 'fexar; 'f*wrrtrnr_rse
lJnnte'rwners .ff9s,:ciati':n, *n behalf ,rf the F'lar.d of Dir.eetnrs
hepeby gr.arrtg appt.c,va). fr,t. aeceg!! act!.,:tsg the atas;c'ciati*rrpt'operty lncated to the gnr.rth aJ, I*ts I arrd ? sr.rb.ject tn thec'wrrer of lots S arrd B re+placirrq arty c{arrr*rgec1 landseapefeatures with itenrs 'rf eqr-ral r:r better. qr_rality arrd ,e;ize thanexistinq. Nn living rfatter" is tr tre r"ernc,vecl. flsgc,ciati*npr'trpel'ty landseape featnr.es rrrrrst he r.e:;t nr.ed fnl lnwinq
c{tnlrt PUct i firr.
"[trie appr.nval isr alsn *r.rbject t,r firra] deeiigrr G.1ppr",3va{1 by the
asi$':'L'iat ian l"or. the per.rrrarre*rrt r.enrcval {]J' arry landscape }^t]clr.s
':'rr AgSjr-'r j. Ett iC,rr pr,::,pefty.
Respectfr.rllv.
t.,n, ra: Lf\ a v' a-.-.'
D i ;rrra D,:rr{'Varr
Secrnt ar.y-l-g x ag Tgwnhc,r-tge H,:,rnec'r.lrrers Ae,g,c,c i.:t i. r'r:
PIan Review Based on
the 1991 Uniform Codes
NAME: THAIN REMODEL DATE: G2l-94
ADDRESS: 483 VAIL VALLEY DR CONTRACTOR: VIELE
VAIL, COLORADO ARCHITECT: FRITZLEN
OCCIIPANCY: R-l ENGINEER: MCGHEE
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-l PLANS EXAMINER: DAN STANEK
CoRRECTTONS REQUTRED
The items listed below are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code
requirernents in the adopted codes. It is a guide to selected sections of the oodes.
The following is not to be construed to be an approval of any violation of any of
the provisions ofthe adopted codes or any ordinance ofthe Town ofVail.
1. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQLITRED rN ALL BEDROOMS AND HALLWAYS AS
PER SEC 12IO OF TIIE 1991 UBC.
2. FrELD TNSPECTTONS ARE REQUTRED TO CIIECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.
3. HANDRAILS TO MEET SEC.33O6 OF TT{E 1991 IJBC.
4. GUARDRAILS TO MEET SEC.1712 OF TIIE I99I UBC.
5. ALL F@TINGS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 48" BELOW GRADE.
6. A STRUCTUAL ENGTNEER WILL BE REQIIrRED TO OKAY ANY STRUCTUAL
CHANGES BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION WILL BE APPROVED BY TOWN OF
VAIL.
7. A ILC (IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE) IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS
TO BE APPROVED BY TI{E TOWN OF VAIL BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION
WILL BE DONE.
o
K
P. 6.(FII{ COHIULTANTS. I HC.
t rr*ttt'/tv
gfEONh|sdttg
c l4td
ExrSTlNG .Q' cflu.
FARTY SIAIL
Elt$|i 'ffi-##?'enAsTeR EEpRoon
I cAA.
srt
SHcRluq 'To-l
,f ex6"rq.
FLco F LI|VEL
u
^l
l-r
UFFEe 6l{oB}t{e e lot'o
?NrE\ LfY-?L
uvNa
I,/ FP?R
TACF
o
e$(
:
(I':
Qlt
i
AHO FOOTER
ol,lAr-
THAIN
-t!t,rlt EARYcal.lflaE l'Ab
Fof, +HoF.lH4
irlortlo x ttol
'|-4.-1n)4-
l..ocAtl}Nb 0? DIACl
FIPE 6FlDfilN,ir -
u€
I
ro6'gLttot JauIJE .trald u. l-rlJl
o
KR TI
{RM CONSULTANTS, tNC,
P.0, Box 4572
vAtr, cot-oRAoo 81658(3ot) 9a$9391r r (303) 949-t6r7
Itit'g
l',u
I,
COHAULTENT9, I NC.a9t9.r915?"
o,rsrno.A*
oruourrreo a, llFM,,
ctiEoftD ?Y t/*" z 1! o
'c^oN5?Rlf-T lot'i gEqurA,cE,
l. pFMar-tpr.r EX{frrlH4 aoVE- €,cAbe
'TRUETU|tE
?O ELEVATIQN OFEx*rh, l'AFrY Dr.uu FMTI llc?, A9PgTEaNqO ck6 To araTll|., tr{A+Y 'htALL.
)2. D{c^yAfg 2'.O WtFe TiarqF+s At to'-ootE.- T.o ILBVATIAN (- lf lA)/ LEAV,N(t*;irr urier6reRE€a *fi,hrru. U#ee
Tfhrlc8ArY 9Hdrlltilq tpoyltr AE lll
fL Cl r u+,uh olAqoNAL tciccFq AT
6?Fopt1ir4& Lod,A"ldHS
3', lou* A+o x ?+' Q,eNFOn<.g,o corJcgEfg
SrEe$ € l0ro o,e, bsLorJ q(1rq, hj,$l
+, g){cAYAtE FFMATNPBG OF eAF.tlE
FBoM Itfl,JFBAi PFtrg
5. FAFF
hJ^tL
LFAVTC Uf rEG Plf E 6HoRr Nc4 EEAC(]Si$ PLAfrq yN?rL FctfrE Acn Cti4oyFbF€qH NFr,J HAU- AHg Lor.rrP ptfa
gHoFrlJA bFAcEe AFf tN ?LAC?,
aoNTeAcToB- To c@l'trt!,!#rF iV EtFtlltFEC
P€FSiFclFtCATrOr.r9 ON SHoEtN4 pl?84
o. coNsTRucTroN gHALL lFacq4|' 46
er,laELy r.g Fn*glaLa ?o Ml|t tMlzE
EIFoSJFE Ar AHT €r,rl,69 '
I
I
t
I
I
I
ItI
q
N
o
-la
o
t,l
At';o PaVll .LElNFo3cBD CrNcAAAtNgr FrgEE FtE t/it,
{o.
I
I
I
I
rrNgtcAvrreD
6l7Hr*lriJ glgs€,
!]jl
i.
F
'I?nNqA$KaN B*g?q.it cr to'-o
Cl',lU ,.IALL
Fi.o umr,
N Dt,{4,a*Ut FtpE Gnl6.nr6' (uFfEF ilMFF^By suarrHd)
6ON9TFUCTION €EQL,EN4E F{-AN
I'rii
=
I til
oPlNq
I96'9a'ae9 J.Lr I Jg
I "o*.u,-rAHrer INc,
KRM CONSULTANTS, INC.
P,0. Box 4572
vAtL, c0toR^00 8165e(303) 9{e.e39r
rAx (303) 949.t 77
2t-o
.pr THAIII EEMdDEL
Fr9Tdl, FICI,
Fri?zl+h PlrrG. Ilr iner
cab,'.^rED,y l{€'M ,, orrr
oHlclqo Er
tlr' - l! o
et86, FLoAP FF Mrilq
qrrrno.
-.
€-l
- ct
-2'Ol
nfe oxo'UU4 e. lo''o --
fo €E lL'$TAtLaP BEFors
Iig,+5 DhILE x -ol e i0'
sP"xrrD rfiJ t4o5* +"lrolflotlllto l11 F^$t4. Fna.
UPFFF 6Id4FiIiCi PIPFb/p6 BtMo/Fe Ar.rOlFFr ll.l fi-^cs
uunL FrroF.
Fe^.,lll.l(r ,{r,D
rl+l t tfl/H ."
A..E rH t+,tcV / /
t55 g lu vecr,
AN9 H,BI",
t
I
I
--louB tlAu- A4^lhter e*CAv,.TgE
FAFTH
I
- LrNp- aF z+rx?*' couc..tx- 71as e lolo lEyoHD .t
t'EHlitD, RFll"lF. t*l/ &)-*rt
VFF''iCAL EAF9
e to"gtil L
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
i:';il i
=g
ilIlII
l,9 ,. l-.'J'
zL<t
-to
eLo
o
a.
I
I
\l
o
#
rl
I3l
Iil
E(t
CHECK REQUEST
DATE: -Z,Z,lZ,/2,PREPARED BY:
/r'"
DESCRTPTION OF EXPENSE: CLEAN UP DEPOSIT REFIIND FOR BP # 4 A<SS'
NAMEOFJOB:
ACCOUNTN{.JMBER 01000022002
AMOUNT OF REzuND: 5AA A
DATE APPROVED, );71- q6
APPROVAL SIGNATURE:
ssPr131
GU.nlw'
lttln 595
^ lt) \
\\Vv
. ,r r(r.)c,-\. \JtL\..11. '(i-O
34-^a"'-t-r''\--*"-:
PagG E
4.0Yff Xr1-{X}3{CordTlrp:Pric.l: ll0tma(E(I(ra
s'rblH: ArF
Phon: 9TKIAIF
S|ltl: (sgtEDhrpln: Jf,frl -+.
TVno:tur4drcyc
AfDlcstt BAITER FOriECdccfn E l,rER l{O,tE
Ottcrt0on: nfgTAtIllEVl,
Rccncstcd Thr.: 0l:d) t
Ptroft!: 971)-3flL2ff8
-€rt|rrd8f FRCI}IT K
ffte6llrrrzT/r-rg f,FfaornPL/(or rr4 rKql/ar ,/efZAtzta 0,fl2t'g
^f 0( (/LL dk
/,tlt r. . I
\ ' oros
O$tX-2001 lnaoecdon Reouest Rcno7flno_S;oo3rn_._ ._ '_vArl.coifOWtbr _l
Rcqwsbd Inepect Date:
lnrpccuon An}a:
Slb Addrogs;
APOlnlbrmrdon
{gc EDWAROSLEE
lbnt: 300 XECHf,ln l
lcdon dTo: COAI/!8-\<b,"ry,
ln3occ:odr Hlgbrs
&m: AXItbm: 3lObrn: 315
tiom: 3El{ll!m: :XlolHn: 3jl0lbm: g)
{ffiondl
(Cli$c,rtan
(Opdoftcl)'S - (Orlisoa[
(OF{rtrutl
(C0'{ood)
(R.(nmtd}
\IENT ATTN
!ffiv, trar {N,200t
483 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
TEXAS T.H. 5A58
R*I|odoc FRESIIEADOYy Kn lfTAS'l COII|STR( CTCodinort: TEXAS TOffl|}|OfaES |JNT.6 &SgUUlLLi:ALt
t__
li r,t.
-T*nq flE 12130
aFEPrlG 1lrts i--oL'-'-* *=o -:
5l{ctrnd PrtLdr Ull fTOr* o|ltlar{o13
P,02
Lrt9d7€,54,e5 P.fry@
l?h FaDnnry 1996
Jtt|qrmutc
$cnlor Phnn$
Towrsf \tril
76 gorJtr Fronhg. Hord
vtn, Oolo|l(h 81097
Daar.Iilt
Fo; lllrln Filldrnor, Flnd oortna$ sf Ooeup|noy
Itb a6rto hrt dH.dd onc of both of lhr Ehglrmrn Bprucs lr€el In hc ftunt ot q'|r hour
db illhh $a noCtrto ymtp ws wlll, b $c.rFntpcctcable, r€place ono or bosr trca
with I|o rprdcr am,JrilnO apolotdnuttly hc snc rertleel llnrar trrlage.
h b our undcrten&rg tret upon recel$ of thle lefrer, Irntr wlll mlea*a trrr IllA hond ttdhn r Fltnl Carftata ol ftu.F anoy.
Vourffircly
MrmAChurohlll
\
Jdn A" ltcln
Tgrf- P. @,
t
lesign Review Action lrt
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number Q
Project Name:
Building Name:
-T-< xct s
,-'nf 1S-/
/ e urn ltOrn€€
Owner, Address and Phone:
ArchitecVContact, Address and Phone:
LegalDescription:Lor&!fu1'3Bbck - subdivision fi(
'(gS (sc'f? Clc,tk Ori-,q
zone District //0nlC
Projest Street Address:
Comments:
vote: 5-O
ffiirovat,r., ih, *o.-.-l #, 6rO
! Disapproval
! StaffApproval €,il* r o€
Cc feI Ctr,
{*,ry
rs €az--1-
( Lrr-*(
1,/ --1,^.@
DRB Fee Pre-paid # d,s
tlP,b u@
a.\l\- &
"*, u
f*-Plac,Q- At t g?uz C L,,-Q- (Ctt
4;t'
*€*Ffr a-
--=Ce@tg
' r-
FILE COPY
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Froruge Road
VaiL Colorado a1657
970-479-2138fi79-2139
FAX 970-479-U52
Februry 7, 1996
Mr. tvfac A. Churchill
J.L. Viele Construction Inc.
Department of Community Development
F4{5D
1000 S- Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Thaln Residence, Final Certiticate of Occupancy
Dear ltllarc:
I have received your recently submitted Design Review Board (DRB) application and have
schechrled your request for DRB review on February 21, 1996. Your submittaldid not include
the application fee, as referenced in your letter. Please provide the application fee as soon as
possiue.
The DRB will discuss your proposed stainvay revisions to the north side of the building, as
well as your concerns regarding compliance with the previously established DRB condition
relating to expert assessment and guarantee of the property's landscaping. You will need to
be present at this meeting, and I would suggest you have your landscape specialist there as
well to answer any guestions the DRB members may have.
As I mentioned in my last letter, it is impossible to perform a landscape inspection in the
middle of the winter. The Town will therefore accept your suggestion of reliance on copies of
invoices, cancelled checks and a notarized letter lrom the landscape subcontractor indicating
that the work was completed per the approved plan. For future reference, it is the
responsibility of the contractor to contact the Town and request an inspection when he
believes that he has completed items contained in the developer improvement agreement.
Hopefully, the Final G.O. can be issued shortly after the February 21, 1996 DRB meeting. lf
you should have any questions about this letter or require any additional information please
feef free to centact me al479-2142.
Silcerely, ^ //ll . f \--
!.rn^t (^",'"W
/
Jim Gumutte
Senior Planner
cc: John and Carmen Thain
Tom Moorhead
File
{j *urr"t"r rur^
Printeci bY Jim curnutte 2/ Os/ 96 l-1:53am
From: Todd Otr)l)errltelmer
To. Jim cr.rrnutte
sultj ect: Ttra.l-n Residence
:::NOTE::::- ---:::-::::2 / O5 / 96-1 1 : o 6am-:
f att ta re\/iewed tl. e letter from
pi."i=io-t Tree wolks'- Mark stelae
.iuo.ist. I am somewtrat famiaiar wittr
iil-=i"i-r" and ]telieve he does have ttte
;;;";i;;;. and knowledse to assess- tlr-e
:i!;;;r;; ace''rlaterv' r agrree wl-tlt M''
;i;ii;;= opinion ofn tr.e aensth of time
ii ^-y tak-e a tree irntrtacte dby roo!
"orra io*pactiort to succurols to etrat
sitrce tlre presert! site conditions do
ilf-.rit- ! th'or:ql' inspectio:'r of the
c'io,-rata aroLrnd ttre tree or the root
:;";.- j-L i3 imPossible to make an
Ii.-..a. ."=-"=^.-t of anY darnag€ whic}.
may }. aa/e occu.red.
obviousll. the retentiorr of these tr'ees
;."-;; iiLportant issue to ttte DRB irt
an. .ppi.ir.r of the proj ect ' I r"tould
=;;..:t that ttre osner sulcmitt a plan
foi-remedial- acEion and folloet-Lrtr> care
aiono wicn a letter of credit or bond
i;-;;" .^o,-'.'c of rhe aPPraised vaaue of
in" t...= for a 30 monctr Period
allovtinql time for tla€! trees to Eo De
rtto.tlco.5a for sigrts of stress' Tt.at
..{i.. woul-<i allow th€ fitral c'o' to b€
i s.srred trittrotlt delay to the ov'ne r '
I am not a certlfied tree applaiser but
if -.= -.."rrtabae Eo the o!.Ilrer and ttre-
ttte corlrrcal I could apPly che atr)pra-asa_L
formrraa !o l}le trees to determine Ehe
;;i;.. ottr€rwise, an alrpraaser from
the counci]- of Tlee atrd landscaPe
appraise.r could tre contacted '
r,htk*,
fLe,se /W)
'Le{$ty .+4,oe,
Page:
,a ,.-?1 n .;f.-Z+J, !
,.L.viets con*rut. ln..
1000 S. Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, Colondo 81657
Tele303. 476. 3082
FaxJ03.476.3423
January 31,1996
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
Town of Vail Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Thain Residence - Final Certificate of Occupancy
Response to letter dated January 25,1996
Dear Mr. Curnutte.
The following is in response to your letter referenced above.
Per the Developer Improvement Agreement (DIA) signed & sealed on
March 9, 1995, J.L. Viele Construction, Inc. escrowed the amount of three thousand, one
hundred and twenty-five ($3,125.00) with the Town of Vail to complete a total of four (4)
outstanding items at the referenced property. We had until July l, 1995 to complete these
items, as listed below
1) Installation of spiral staircase along with D.R.B. Application for a
minor alterafion to the Town approved drawings.
The installation is complete and the D.R.B. Application is attached to this
correspondence.
2) A professional Arborist's assessment of the health of trees on the
project purportedly affected by the construction.
This assessment can and has been accomplished in January . I am
enclosing the report from our specialist. For the record, it should be explained to both
yourself, and the rest ofthe "staff', that no one can be expected to guarantee the longevity
of plant life - we are not God and aren't authorized to use crystal balls to determine the
future. Our specialist will address the apparent health of trees directly affected by the
project and speculate what, ifany, stress to the trees could have occurred during the
construction of the proj ect.
3) Completion of the landscaping plan approved by D.R.B.
The landscaping on this project was completed well before the
"completion date" of July I , I 995. The amount of work performed was actually in
excess of the original plans. It is not our responsibility to noti$ your office when our
DIA tasks are completed. Moreover, it is your office's responsibility, as Public Officials,
to veriff that the items have been completed and are in conformance with the DIA. I can
provide invoices, check copies and a notarized letter from the Landscape Subcontractor
indicating the performance and completion of this task, upon request. It is unreasonable
to wait until the snow has melted from the site to confirm completion and therefore hold
up the Certificate of Occupancy until spring.
4) Completion of deck skirting.
This item was completed prior to T.C.O. and can be viewed in the field.
Jim, thank you in advance for your assistance and cooperation. I
anticipate that we will be able to finalize this outstanding Certificate of Occupancy
within the next two weeks and expect to receive our DIA Escrow Impound Refund upon
issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy Documents. Please do not hesitate to
contact me with further comments or questions.
Regards,
ttl/n /i -\
+lffituttCpU)Marl A. Churchill
Enclosures: D.R.B. Application and Application Fee
Precision Tree Works
cc:John & Carmen Thain
Tom Moorhead
Mike Smith
James L. Viele
rks bx 6(M . Vdl, Cobrado 81ffi . (970) 815-8375
January 30ll 1996
Mr. Marc ChurchillJ.L. Viele Construction
1000 S. Frontage Rd., +202Vai1, CO 81657
RE: Thain Residence, 483 Gore Creek Dr.
Dear Marc:
Further to our meeting of ilanuary 23, 1996 I am sending you
the results of my findings concerning tvo engelmann spruce.
The two spruce are located at the S.E. corner and
S.W. corner of the Thain residence. Seeing as the ground wasfrozen, this tree assessment only addresses the above-groundportion of these trees.
On the day of inspection, both trees appeared to have normalfoliage coloration; relatively succulent buds, needles, andtuigs; and an absence of trunk bark wounds. The only visiblephysical damage evident nas to a felr lower branches(primarily the S.E. tree) which were left tattered from
rubbing on objects. In addition, both trees had a smallinsect infestation of needle scale in the Lower canopy(again, primarily the S.E. tree). The onset of scale isusually an indicator of tree stress.
Construction around trees usually involves root cutting and
al'ways involves soil compaction, both of which contribute tooverall tree stress. If root cutting was limited to that
which was descr j.bed, my largest concern would not be rootcutting, rather it would be soil compaction. Soil compaction
adversely affects water percolation, root aeration,
microorganisms and mycorrhizal fungi.
ffi
I
JM.
I
I ean be of further aesietance,
2
In conclu8j.on, these trees do have a chance forsurvival. The prospect of eurvival could also be increaeedthrough follos-up care and remedlal action. Hovever, thepresent appearance of these trees does not guarantee
Eurvlvability since streseed tree6 rarely die vithin thefiret tro years rather decline is ueually spread over a 3 -
1O year period.
If you have any questions orpleaEe give me a eall.
Sincerely, a i
Mark Stelle
DESTEI lSrrtErt
^v
DOIRD APEITICATI6 . TOTIE OF VAI[, COLOSIDO
. DATE RECEXil
DABE OF DR3 IGETIIF:
trttl*tt5f J
QoFnLEi?E Apz',reilIzau$ ryt'/, Eot zz gwohw Fe n8|drrEfi.**+aa**tt.
PROiIEQT E5FORIiIIII(DT:I.
l.
u.FTPE OF BEVXEI9:
c.
D.
a ne€ts all'd bounds lcaal
o|1 a seParate Saeet. a|ld aBEacb
New coastEuctioa ({200 .ool -1 vuor AteBrarlon (gzo.0o).a.ddLtiog (950,00)
-Coacepr,uat
Revler"-igOt
ADDREss, 483 6ope hae* Ouye.. uuf? - Vatl, 4o
IJECAIJ ElockEubdlvirloa
rf pro.perty is deecribed byaelcriDtfon. glease provideto gbiE alrPticetloa,
8.
F.
ZOIIING;
NEUE OFli+tline
-/l frui
G.APPITICAIW.8
lddregsr
r.
J.
APP',Jc5'rzOeE n:tw w? gE EROSIES,SED ,fismw OrfriER.S SsGmrERE
CoudomiaLun aDDroval if agllllcable.
DRB FEEI DRB !c66, cg ehon! abovs, ate Uo be paid aB tsheElae of subEdgtal of the pnr apniiciifos. --r,-aEer, truea
ry?lyf?g foq a_ bruttdtng persriEl pteagE lcbaelfy rhe aceuratevaLuatsLoD of tbc DJoDesal. trhe iorrn of vetl ri-rt adjust tb8fEe accordlng uo -taCtable below, to rssuri-the coriicE-fu-ls pala.
fil DAIDr I . etECE + ___ pa Er _. lT, . _
FEE SCHEDIILET
FEEI 20.00i 50.00
s100.00ttnn 6,^l
VALUATTOlIt 0.f 10..000;10,001 -$ 50,000f50,001 .f 150,0009150.001 - t i0n.000
t
o9
FILEMPY
75 South Fronage Road
Vail, Colorada 81657
970-479-2 1 3 8/479-2 I 3 9
FAX970-479-2452
January25, 1996
Mr. Marc A. Churchill
J.L. Viele Construction Inc.
1000 S. Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, CO 81657
Department of Community Development
BE: Thain Resldence, Final Certificate of Occupancy
Dear Marc:
This letter is intended to respond to your January 23, 1996 letter to me regarding a Final
Certificate of Occupancy for the Thain Residence. As you'll recall, we discussed what we
could remember off-hand about what needed to be done at the Thain residence in order for
the Town to issue a Final C.O. for the property. We ended the conversation with me agreeing
to research the Town's files and determine exactly what needed to be done. I have now
completed my review and offer the lollowing information.
When you were issued a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy on March 13, 1995 there were a
few items related to the redevelopment that had not yet been completed. You entered into a
Developer lmprovement Agreement with the Town and provided escrow money to assure the
completion of the remaining improvements by July 1, 1995. The remaining improvements
included:
- lnstallation ol the spiral staircase;
- Professional Arborists assessmenVguarantee of the landscaping on the property.
The exact wording of the DF|B condition of approval is as follows:
-"ln the spring, before the bond is returned, the applicant must have a qualitied
expert elsesq tbe cotdition_g!€Ij?U_dsqgpiQg an{gueFltee th ete*lacement
pt-atyl€eqlFl-lha-cxpe!:Lbejieqes-Itillno_t su,r-vjy-e, The replacement of any
trees determined to have a low chance of survival must be complete before the
issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy for the building."
- Completion of all remaining landscaping on the property; and
- Completion of the deck skirting.
Although I have received the revised elevation and site plan drawings, intended to show how
you are proposing to replaces the spiral staircase, I have not received a DRB application and
submittal fee for this change. Please provide.
{,g *"n""ro rur*
o
Yq0-fu#rhurchirl
Page 2
As indicated above, please be sure that the Arborist you have contacted assesses the
i".Oiti". "i "f
l tand's'capinb on the propery and guarantees the.replacemsnt of any trees that
heishe believes will noi survive. Can inis assessment be completed in mid-January?
The landscaping that needed to be completed on the Thain propefi included sod, reseeding,
shrubs and boulders. How is statf supposed to verify that lhese improvements have been
completed with two feet of snow on the ground? Any suggestions?
Upon satisfactory completion of the above items stafi will issue a Final Certificate of
Occupancy for the Thain Residence.
I hope the information contained in this letter is what you were looking for, however, if you
have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitats to contact me at 476-
2142.
Sincerely,l. .ltt'w/
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
cc: John and Carmen Thain
Tom Moorhead
File
-; :!f
J,L.viele con"tru0,r, ln".
1000 S. Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, Colondo 81657
Tele303. 476. 3082
Fax303.476.3423
January 23,1996
Mr. Jim Cumutte
Town of Vail Community Development
Vail. CO 81657
RE:Thain Residence
Certificate of Occupancy matters
Dear Jim,
Pursuant to our phone conversation I have obtained the drawings you had
requested showing the spiral staircase being elimiaated. I had 2 copies delivered to your
ofFlce on Friday.
I have also met with Mark Stelle, a Licensed Arborist, on the jobsite to review the
condition of the spruce trees on the south side of the home. He will prepare a report for
me over the next few days regarding his professional assessment of the state of these
trees.
Please contact me at yow earliest convenience with any question or comments. It
is my understanding that upon giving you the report from Mark Stelle, I have fulfilled the
D.R.B.'s requirements for the Certificate of Occupancy for the referenced project. Thank
vou in advance for vour assistance.
Marc A. Churchill
Project Manager
,/"",John & Carmen Thain
"'' jiold#:,'',t-gl.\:lfH"1il.lL lt'
vArL. CoLoRADO 81657
*d @F TRANsnnrrrAL
(303) 476-3082
WE ARE SENDING YOU ll^tb P
tr Shop drawings
tr Copy of letter
n
tr
E Under separate coveryia./Prints tr/ Plans
Change order
E Samples
JAt l g lgg0
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval
El lor your use
F As requested
tr
tr
n
.
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Returned for corrections
D Resubmit
-copies
for approval
tr Submit
-
copies for distribution
E Return
-
corrected prints
D For review and comment
D FOR BIDS DUE
o^rElfrtu //, /qqb I'o'"o qfrz
Ar-rE'ft'oN )h &lrLrrufr4RE: UT|.ol, Q.r-sraar.cs-
tuffat glil>Aub- -fl,evixd0rad"b
",::,Hffi
COPIES DATE NO.,nlll nE\l nEg
J t hlqe 6lot fb€ R-rarltftF !2(frLt V V ' Vvlfllllr l/LTr Yrr
a q/ e/4*Hott ty'c-k ej.uaArb^-
19
--
- PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
tl
',ncrotur?/a
er€ not eE notod, klndly notlly ua at onca.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2,r"52
February 7, 1996
Mr. Marc A. Ghurchill
J.L. Viel6 Gonstruction Inc.
1000 S. Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, GO 81657
Deparunent of Community Development
BE: Thain Residence, Final Certificate of Occupancy
Dear Marc:
I have received your recently submitted Design Review Board (DRB) application and have
scheduled your request for DBB review on February 21, 1996. Your submittal did not include
the appli'cation fes, as referenced in your letter. Please provide the applicalion fee as soon as
possible.
The DRB will discuss your proposed stairway revisions to the north side of the building, as
well as your concerns regarding compliance with the previously established DRB condition
relatingio experl assessment and guarantee of the property's landscaping. You will need to
be present at this meeting, and I would suggest you have your landscape specialist there as
well to answer any questions the DRB members may have.
As I mentioned in my last letter, it is impossible to perform a landscape inspection in the
middle of the winter. The Town will therefore accept your suggestion of reliance on copies of
invoices, Cancelled checks and a notarized letter from the landscape subcontractor indicating
that the work was completed per the approved plan. For future reference, it is the
responsibility of the contractor to contact the Town and request an inspection when he
believes that he has completed items contained in the developer improvement agreement.
Hopefully, the Final C.O. can be issued shortly after the February 21, 1996 DRB meeting. lf
you should have any questions about this letter or require any additional information please
feef free to contact me al479-2'142.
Si4cerely, r /fl. r \JAILn-,t Utat .t-<tillLC)
Jim Cumutte
Senior Planner
cc: John and Carmen Thain
ffif
File
{g *r"nuoru"*
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970- 479-2 I 3 8/479r' 2 I 39
F4X970479-2452
January 25, 1996
Mr. Marc A. Churchill
J.L. Viele Gonstruction lnc.
1000 S. Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, GO 81657
RE-l Finat certificate of occupancy
Dear Marc:
This letter is intended to respond to your January 23, 1996 letter to me regarding a Final
Certificate of Occupancy for the Thain Residence. As you'll recall, we discussed what we
could remember ofl-hand about what needed to be done at the Thain residence in order for
the Town to issue a Final C.O. for the property. We ended the conversation with me agreeing
lo research the Town's liles and determine exactly what needed to be done. I have now
completed my review and offer the following information.
When you were issued a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy on March 13, 1995 there wers a
lew items related to the redevelopment that had not yet been completed. You entered into a
Developer lmprovement Agreement with the Town and provided escrow money to assure the
completion of the remaining improvements by July 1, 1995. The remaining improvemenls
included:
- Installation of the spiral staircase;
- Professional Arborists assessmenuguaranlee of the landscaping on the properly.
The exact wording of the DRB condition ol approval is as follows:
'ln the spring, before the bond is returned, the applicant must havs a qualified
. expert assess the condition'of all landscaping and guarantee the replacement
of any trees that the expert believes will not survive. The replacement of any
trees determined to have a low chance of survival must be complete before the
issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy for the building."
- Gompletion of all remaining landscaping on the property; and
- Gompletion of the deck skirting.
Although I have received the revised elevation and site plan drawings, intended to show how
you are proposing to replaces the spiralstaircase, I have not received a DRB application and
submittal fee for this change. Please provide.
Department of Community Development
{,7 ""'"uo'u"'
Marc Churchill
Page 2
As indicated above, please be sure that the Arborist you have contacted assesses the
condition of all landscaping on the property and guarantees the.replacement of any fees that
he/she believes will not sri'tive. Can inis assessment be completed in mid-January?
The landscaping that needed to be compleied on the Thain property included sod, reseeding,
snruOi and bouTders. How is staff supposed to verify that these improvements have been
corpfeteO with two feet of snow on the ground? Any suggestions?
Upon satisfactory completion of the above items staff will issue a Final Certificate of
Occupancy for the Thain Residence.
I hope the information contained in this letter is what you were looking for, however' if you
have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 476-
2142.
Sincerely,/;M
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
cc: John and Carmen Thaint-
File
John and Carmen Thaln
85 Old Roarlng Brcok Roadllt Klsco, NewYork 10549
(ero 66ees55
April 17, 1995
Ms. Helen H. Chatfield
540 Soulh Franldin Streel
Derwer, CO 8O2G)
Ms. Dbna Donovan
1014llomestake Circle
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Helen and Dbna,
Our unit b finaly neadng completion and we wquld like to resolve wilh you the issue of the rear staircase.
We have had several cornrersalbns with Diana over the hsl cor.qple of rronths rwiewing a few optbns,
irrcludittg reinstalling the $aircase on the other sile of your unit or simply prwlding emergency acc€ss to
our deck frcm Helen s dec-lc We rvouH like sonre direc.tion ftrom both of you on how you wbh lo poceed.
We upuH also like to confirm thal th€ drafl of the lbensing agre€rnenl is acceptable to you and to &y
Peleson.
Please call us if you wish to dbcuss eilher issue. We look fonvard to seeing you in July.
and Carmen Thain
\
cc: Jay Pelerson 7JimCumuttew
Tom ilooftead
Rick Rosen
i/l
.: r. t:
iuri L - ..,.;*i,. I
rcHjH'Btffil
{
qL'e.K #
=t6a./
P." p,M,
loor
bla@o--.aca6
lt! lfs
5-Iit.3trITl__
DEIIEffiI[GfiKTrErErN|r
#ig*Ug*#gf,*frffi,J.;s,H
$,'D0.s
r-tE0D
- - fl3dffi,b rdtrocrft rpor&r* H'r ur .o=-n, * ff
Hffi ffi#f&Hffi,gf ?H#.sr=lr-r+qFryHFfiHnEffiE*f,ffiffF-ffircr_.ra tl-(g-igfi fi fr ;'?q-Hffi ffi SHH4uffi;itrr'?ffifi'ShnttaariHf*-l"g;FEffiaT.'#
I " #"fiffi,H*,:rn#li {:F* ;il nr m rn*g,Hg'ggll5g=1-,I1ffiffiffh5r"441s995sftHieffiffi-sRffiH.%ilfffiHfiEffiaa'*lrlrffiiu rhr--l+fi.
-t* g,F $ ffifi|ffi phur dh d{!uhr* ffi r*a cr lrntqp rtrr F
'-,ffifrHffilffiaffituf.tnodr
"*"'nffi srHr#rrffi ffi '- .r n.f Arn.*r
ilffi ffi #*t?Hffi rogms_y.u,ffi ,ffi
. rriFrTrF nE
t lffi}ttrffit'*6dr,
r. Erl{rl|lrrrdrnUlfu
ttrl
l.
+'u'!laar'
I'IFR B9 '9F-
.-.|-=h
all rtll
-a-r.
Ielp,rurt "'t to3-,
%-jo 0r
i.$m"sffiFJ??ffi,;E
-ffiffi
mi."g.$ffi mffi u,t..g,r*s#*m*w
,-".-L.&H.lAiilP-USffi"3l, b rffir 6E !D !0 b,
. lrDlftal' drlrt rrhn
l"1ffiH.JH: dl'iffiE ry uf ',!!uo,urrf
nifiicErrG
''o P,al
loor
Wrto . tlq^t lo+2 _,
ffi,
Itrt
rlr hfi lf,rryrtcrcl|s n, rbd{r W n t Xqcru, rqirlt-'uqu.
hrrUacttltrt
ryGrhahf -fuquff2. tq
r?Arro0oo[{ADO
sta"totrrct tlr,tr fql*'hlbr bnrr AF_ r rryrh|td Er o t-ryC
tlrrryHdtCt|rL
r+rrrdlqrra_ir
llAR-.8-95 llED 15:25 P, 02
,.L,Vir:. Coo:tucticn, lnc.
1000 S. Fonngs noad Wcrt, Suitc 202
Vil, Onlandn f,1(67
Tclc303. 47it 30$2
Fu 303, {76. 3423
March E, 1995
Mr. Jim Cumulte
Torrn ofVail
Dopartmcnt of Commurriry Developmcnt
75 S. Frontago Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
RL: 'lhnin Rcgidcnoo
T.C.O. Requircments
Deu Jirn.
Pcr our disoussion todoy, bc adviscd tlat rvc vill not be using urry bulbs in thc
exterior fixtrnss excccding 40 watts. We also aoknon'ledgc the Lighting Ordinance
n'hich allows us a total of 3 exterior fixturos on fte builCiug. We understaud that more
lighting rnay be added tlrrough a variatrce process.
Also, ln lcgulrJ to dre-trud&g1;aflgg docuurcut prcviously submilted, rlp have
revised it pcr our discussion today and arc rcsubmitting it wilh this oorrespondcrcc for
yolu rcvicw and approval.
Regarding the stairs offthe back dcck, *'c will shorten the run so that thc stnirs do
luet crusu ovcr irto town propcrty. A revissd I.t,.C. can be proviclcd if necessitry.
The DFvelo[uncut Improvcmcnt Agreenrent has lrcen corrccicd per our discussion
today. Rict Rosan will be lhxing it to our offrce this aftcraoon. \l'e will heve the'ltqio e
sign ollon the documeut and rehun it to your otlice u,ith th€ bond amount.
\Ye believe we havc sati$cd all thc 'lbwn s requirernents for releasing a T.C,O.
inspeclion. We would likc this inspectiorr to occur as soon as possible, as we arc ready.
Please call us et 476-3082 with auy questions or coorments. Thonk you in odvoncc for
your coopelatiDn,*-W
Pmjeet Managu
cc: Jobn&CarnrenThain
RickRosen
Lynn Fritzlen
I,IAR-8-95 l,fED 15128
lf Vlelo Cond;rusUoir, Inc.
l0ill .S. thonhsc nord V/t*, SlnR ?0?
1Ail, Coloodo 61657
1tlc30t, +76.30e3
ftrt'3.476. 31A3
March 7, 1995
THAINRE$IDENCEI
:
betwccn oristing Blue Sprucc Trseg
$s30.00
0300.Q9.
$45.00'
- ':_ r\
s50,ug
$r5t.00
$130.00
$200.00
i at perimetor of dook
ell florer box€$ (gldock
+ Roin Assrrciation propcrty
r Contraot with profcssional ',Arbrristn to cousult about
"sullvablllty" of cxisting frecs oD sit€
t"$"1t1 okuting (west sldc orrly)' $?s0,@]'oTALr 8t.700.00
+w'@rW
DN?
!-zo-eb THU i?:2e
AND PLACE
SOII, r PREP
528.88
40,00
50.00
BOULDER9
130 . O0
AND FINE
,t 90 ,00
176 .00
rl. ros.q8
Frfz & GAY!,oBD L''ANDSCAPING, INC.landrccDint' lrrlSatlon & uslntenanco
E.O. EOX 1315vAI!, 00 81668
30 g-4?6-04?9
TIIATN RFSTI}ENC8
ITANDECAPE PROPOSAL-l / 2S /tta
sQD-?,{04 SQ. FT. O+.22
FLAHT MATERIAT
3*6 GAIJ. REDTI|IO DOGIIOOD 0815.0010-1 CaL. CLIXATTS VINE Oi5.00
UISCELLANEOUS LABOR AND NOUIPTiENT:
2 HRS. OF HEAVY EQUTPMENT 9155.00/HB. TO MOVE
AND SPR,EAD TOP SOIL
a0 HRs, MANUAL, ITAEOR TO CITEAN-UP, SPRDAD TOp
ET'NE AND PRUNE TNEES CS44.OO1 LoADS OF TOP SOIL lll?5.00
TOTAL TIROJEOT OOAT
P, 02
. llAR- 13-95 t10N 14:35
I'L.Ylu'!e
o
Conrtrustionl
ft J(t S. FrqrtqgE l{rmd rd&sr, Suirc 200
. Vril, Coloaado 81652
rllcru,476,3,()82
Frr 303. 476. 342r
Mrwh 13, 1995
Jim CurnuEe
Tonn ofVail
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
Dsar Jim,
Based on today's conversation bctween Ma,rc Churchill arrd yoursclll I undcrstand
thut udditi{luil commitnents must be madc in ordu lbf the Town to accept the Thain's
Dcvcloper Tmprcvemcot Agreement (DIA). I am awarE that the $800.00 cost lor the
spital sAircase, identifred in the DIA, is of concern to the Town because it only includes
the cost of reinstnlling the stnircesc, which is ia our posscssion, and not thc Gost itsclf.
'Although we don't believo that is likely, we flre awit€ thil if the Thains should dcfault on
rlrelr agreement to instnlt the irnprovunents id$titied in the DIA, and take the cccisting
stairsasc with thau, the Town will not hsvc sufficierit furds to complete thc
improvements on the Tbain property.
I realizp lhat the 'lbwn could simply rcquire a new DIA and escrow check, whioh
includes the valuc of the staircase, prior io the issuancc of a Temporary Ccrtificatc of
OcCulrancy (lCO) f6f thc Tfiain rosidenco, Ilowcvrr, sincc urc wish tr ohtain n TCO
todny, I wttuld requcst lhat you ococpt thc following sommitment from my company,
J.L. Vielc Construction, Ino. agrccs that if the'lbalns should dclhult on their
agreemeff to install the staircase on the building by July lst, 1995, rny conrpany will
work with the Towu to complete thc inrprovemrnrts, according to thc ptoceus outlinod in
thc DIA, for a total cost not to cxceed $S00.00. Furiher, I undotsttnd tJrc fininancial risk
to ruy cornpany assosiatcd witl this coruu hnsnl" and requcst ilr&t the fown iloccpt this
letter, as opposed to reqtriring a new DIA and ercrow chcck.
#"r:,
Presidcnt
o o
t:
':;
:;
TOWN OF VAIL
.4
DEP-rRTl\tg\T OF CO:\L\tLliITl' DE\TLOPME\T
*on,- a t -t (- ur r" tt rr/fr -
ADDRrss C=+a - l)€ t/ .o^r" { , l3
P ROJE CT
CHECXS I{ADE }AYASLE TO TO\TN OF V IL
accol)iT \o.ITEII
0 0000 4l 540 ZONING AND ADDRESS ]\4APS (5 0()
U 0000 .{:115 UNIFORN{ BUILDING CODE s54.00
0 0000 12115 UNIFORM PLU]I{BII-G CODE s39.00
0 0000 42415 TNIFORT,I I\,IECHANICAL CODE $37.00
0 0000 4l4 t 5 UNIF'ORN{ FIRE CODE s36.00
0 0000 4t4l i NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE s37.00
0 0000 4:11 5 OT]IER CODE BOOKS
0 0000 1l 548 BLUE PRlNTS (N,IYLARS)s7.0u
0 0000 .{l1l 2 XEROX COPIES s0.25
0 0000 42412 STUDIES
0000 4?412 TOVFEI]S CO]\,IPUTER PROGRA]\,t s5.00
0 0000 4li 7 t PENALTY FEES / RE-I}{SPECTIONS
0 0000 4l 332 PLAN REVII:W RE-CI{ECK FEE tS40 PER I{R.l
c1000 4:_1i2 OFF IIOURS NSPECTION FEES
0 0000 4 t-1t 2 CONTRICTORS LICI:r'SES FEES
0 0000 J I]l 3 SJGN,,\PPLlC.{TION FEE s20.00
n 0000 .1 l4 I i .\DDITION^L SIGNAGE FEI.J ISI.OO PER SQ.FT,]
0 00t)0.1:-+4u VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
t,0000 -{ 133 I PRE PAID DESIGN REV]EW tsOARD FEE
0 0000 Jt37l INVESTIGATION ljEIl r BUI LDINC)
J 0000 -+5 l l0 TOV PARKI,r-G FUND
n 0000 1t027 TOV NE\YSP.APER DISPENSER FUND* 0l 0000 2t I t2 TAXABLE r3]. 1% (ST..\TE)
* 0l 0000 ,{1010 T,I\..\BLE @ .{% (TO\\'\)
0l 0000 4li7l BI- I LDINO INYLSTICATION
o oaD?aaXb oTIIER- A tsc e(€ue(&Qf qe.e.(l^f laS,oc
-ffi'O.o-d--J200-m-
--s20-0-:00-
-i_t-
{
0 0000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION IMORE TI{AN IOO SQ.I.T.]s500.00
0 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT tNE\\']s 1.500.00
0 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMAJOR A]\{END s I,000.00
0t 0000 11330 SPECIAL DEVELOPI\4ENT D I STR ICT tMiNOR AIvIEND s200.00
0 0000 1l i30 SUBDIVISION
9;
fi
E
it
0r 0000 413i0 VARIANCE s250.ocl
0 0000 4l-130 ZONING CO DE AMEI\ DML,NTS s250.00
0 0000 41i30 RE. ZONING s200.00
OTHER
OTHER
s
t5
t
lToTn L:d 3/l-e{ 5cC
,.,*'*,,{oLn tCor^e,,Tloin DT4 gEcto,,.J *^p^( v
cAsE r._-l cK..r-t !1.0Lt REC. BY:-
J.L, VTELE CONSTRUCTION, lNC.
trATE INVOICE
a7,/ LCt/93 :?95
DESCFIFTlON94!f, TFISIN
3L624
IUE'I F'AYI'JENT31?5.{)0 31?5.0r:)
'? { ,1l:i r-!r-r 'i t ,1|:: |-\r I
. t. VIELE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTIUENT OF COf'TILAiITI' DET'ELOPMENT
CHECKS IIADE P YA.8I.E TO TOWN OF VAIL
: ACCOUNT n-O.ITEM - No. TAX " CCT E/tj TUIAI
0l 0000 4.1 540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $5.00
0 t 0000 42415 UNIFORM BUILDING CODL $54.00
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLLMBINC CODE $39.00
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $37.00
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM FIRE CODE $J6.0U
0l 0000 424 l 5 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE s37.00
0l 0000 42415 OTIIER CODE BOOKS
0l 0000 41518 BLUE PzuNTS (MYLARS s7.00
0t 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES $0.2r
0l 0000 424t2 STUDIES
0l 0000 424t2 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM s5.oo
0l 0000 12371 PI:NALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTIONS
0l 0000 41332 PLAN REVII:W RE-CHECK FEE t$40 PER IIR.
0r 0000 42_132 OFF IIOURS INSPECTION FI-ES
0l 0000 414r2 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEF-S
0 r 0000 41413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE s20.00
0l 0000 414l 3 ADDITIONN L SIGNAGE FEE IS I .OO PER SO.F]
0l 000042440 '/lC ARI PROJECT DONATION
0l 000041331 PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE
0l 0000 42371 INVESTICATION F]]E (BUILDINC
3l 0000 451 l0 TOV PAzuiING FUND
0l 0000 22027 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPENSER FUND* 0l 0000 2ntz TAXABLE @ 4% (STATE
* 0l 0000 41010 T,TXABLE @ 4% (TOW\
0l 0000 42371 BUILDING INVESTIGATION
ot
^qoau7
OTIIER - A,sC -leuetmf qececaf la5,ac
PEC APPLICATION FEES
0l 0000 413i0 DDI I'IONAL GR}A "250"l;200.00
0l00004r330 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT s200.00
0l 0000 41330 EXTER]OR ALTERATION ILESS TIIAN IOO SO.FT.$200.0t|
0r 0000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATTON [MORts TI{AN i00 SQ.FT.$500.00
0l 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT D]STRICT INEW s I .500.00
0r 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMAJOR AMEND s 1.000.00
0l 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTDISTRICT IMINOR AMEND s200.00
0l 0000 4t 330 SUBDIVISION
0l 0000 41330 VARIANCE s250.00
0l 0000 41330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS s250.0u
0l 0000 41330 RE - ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER
IToTAL{3rlA5OC
,"'n un ,, 1JoLn t CerAcrt TIo in DD4 €Gr- fvo*) *^oa( V
cAsE t__] cK.r r__r 1,1. 0 Ll REC- BY:-
\
.(,/ . \t.'A l' \\'/ /
\J,/\ -'
--a-i-l:-ia: '-r a: i !i-. F i
:"r::;--:.'- . -= i.::.
3L624
''.
: ::.. . l
--- Li :..'! -, ,
'.
- !- -z .-1a 1
I.L. \'IEI-E CONSTRUCTION, INC.
I ,,::i j i; ;;r;t,ii_; i i-li::
i L i, ,i i .'i :,, :l . :i i :r ? .-. :j j:i. .j: ._-1,
]j ii- i:;i-.i:r i ir:' I .i i:iiij :rjj::- l'
.j :. i::i,, i.i.i
i:r ,...i .j
ii.l i-: j\.i j.
,l : ;:t;--l ,, 1_31,
.::, i. ":ll:i " i..:i-]
)
BATLEY, llnnnnrc & PprpnsoN
A PnoressroNAl Conporurror.r
ATToRNEYSArLAw
LINCOIJ{ CENTER
1680 LINCOLN STREET, EUrIE 81?6
DENVEn COI,oRADO t{r28{
TEIJPHONE (S0S) t87.r880
FACSIMILE (80E) 887.000?
TO3
FROl.t3
DATE:
RE:
UEUORANDU!,7
JII.'I CURNUTTE, TOWN OF VAIL
JAY K. PETERSON
MARCH 9, 1995
TEXAS TOWNHOUSE/THATN
VAIL NATIONAL BAD{K BLDO.
108 sor.,lrl FRoNTACE ROAD WE8T, SUITE
vAIr,, cotoRADo tr867
TELEPIIONE (808) {?O.I'OO8
FACSr![rrJ (EoE) t?0.(Xt7
Dear Jim:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation you rnay issue the T.C.O. to
the Thains. f am giving this approval based on the fact that they
are willing to replace the sta j.rway in its original location or in
a location to the west. They have also agreed to give us a license
agreement pursuant to the original understqpdinq at lhg tine we
wipnarew orir variance appgat ai tne p.E.q. $g0q r^, T#a \!i*d"h4,dfo6 DeB \"as^l,r.irp;-, '.5rt vy-.ft XD \^^,u6$.q.^d S-u.-+,x PeB vmnf,rn;E;-, r,)rl v-{^ia XD *r.#0^.^"-s;
Yld-{/ ,"/ -ft$\J ,'4 s(l,,ur.,& "'
srncerely r - v
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number Q ^ /^ , / ,ox. 7/]/ /16
--..-1- i 7 ^ProieaName: '1 hcttt', Vtt,,T> (.'.-nt49 r4f4\
Buildino Name: -T< Xra S '-To tn-rn /,a r',na<
Projecl Description: \- l-.,,
fu (,
Owner, Address and Phone:
. r (1<-S
u'tbq -. Lt; P
@*
e'E-4d
Archilect/Contact, Address and Phone:
zon€ Districr //2/4E
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motion by;
ErApprovat u.'r{i. c,"-c) Jr6*
Vote:5--e
I Disapproval
I Staff Approval
:)'Conditions: / ;
t(
.:l J'ti.'- i I .,.t-' /-c.
C:, ?L*/L1
fh
".;'€c; I 9
)iL:/v-;.t?
Qbr, -1
,o( Lrou(4 .t-
'I
t'i ---->-&
DRB Fee Pre-paid f!/ ,lL'
i
Asign Review Action irt
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number l?
Project Name:
,( J,;a,-/ 5 -n f
- J /-Buildingnane: / € Xqq / ec<sat l'ient€S
Project Description:€*
c/'-
Owner. Address and Phone:
Legal Descripti on: Logrlath1jlglock -
Project StreetAddress' LI F'-:l '? C-r"-
Subdivision zone District /llt f
.----
Board {Statt Action .,
Motion by:
Seconded by:
n Approval
o{ 3,*r^*r, (,,
ilAR- 8-gE l,lED i5:25
--ffi"6n^ch.
Project Managcr
cc: John & Canuen l'hain
RickRmen
Lynn Fritzlen
P, 02
v
t.L.Vir:G cqrti;tugtl€n, lft o.
1000 S, Fronngc Rcrd Wcrt, Sritc 202
Vnil. fnlnredn f,1L67
Tile3tt3. 47t5. 3082
Fpr 303, 476. 3423
March E, 1995
Mr. Jim Curnirtte
Tov,n ofVeil
Depa^rtment of Community Development
75 S. Frontago Rd,
Vail, CO 81657
Rb: 'lhninRcsidcnco
T.C.O. Requirpments
Dear Jim.
Ppr our disoussion today, bc adviscd that wc will not be using arry bulbs in thc
exterior fixtures exceeding 40 watts. Wo also aoknowledge the Lighting Ordinance
which allows us atotal of 3 exterior fixtures on the buildiry. We understard tlnt more
lighting rnay he added through a vn.riance process.
Also, in r'€gard [u the tardrcurePlun tlosurucut prcviously submilted, we have
revised it per our disoussion today and e,rc rcsubmilting it with this col'respondcrcc for
your rcvicw and approval.
Regarding the stajrs offthe back dcck, u'c will shorten the run so that ttrc stnirs do
llol sro$s ovcr into towu prop'rrty. A revisorl I.l..C. can he providcd if necessrry.
The DeveloFrnent Inrgrovcnront Agreerrr9.n( has been corcctcd per our discussion
today. Rick Roscn wili be laxing it to our o{fice this aft,--rnoon. We will hsvc thc'Its^in'e
sign offon the document urd return it to your ollice with the bond amount.
We believe we have satisfied all thc 'fown s requirements for releasing a T.C.O.
inspection. Wc would likc this inspection to occur as soon as possible, as we are ready,
Please call us at 476-3082 rvith any quertions or eomrlleflts. Thork you in odvanoc for
your cooperation,
t.vt.d,7lLlgl
DESIGTiI
o
REVIEW
o
OFAOARD APPIJTCATION . TOI{N
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETTNG:
rt***tt!ti*t
Y
!r*****t*!rrr
ffi
jr, JEV, DEPTI.
A.DESCRIPTION:
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
Nevr Construction (g200. OOI X.uinor Alt,eration ($20.00)Addition ($50. OO) --
-Concepuual Review (g0)
ADDREsst 493 horz &eL Drirc; ltuiJs B*) g rr)a;J .Loc.
D.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot,Subdivision
If property is described bydescripLi.on, pleiase provid-Lo this applicaCion.
a meeLs and bounds
on a separate sheet.
legaI
and attach
E.
I.
ZONING:
NAME OF
Mailing
APPLICANT:
Address:
G.NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATTVE:Mailing Address:
H.NAME
4FF
OWNE
I.
,I .
Mailing Address, A);u-_a_ 6_4 A-\rt1>e-
phone
APPLICATTONS WILL NOT BE PROCSSSTD WTTHOT'T OWNER'S STGI'ATUR.E
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are t,o be paid at lhe
varuation of Ehe proposal . The iown of vaiL wilt adjust thefee according to the table below, to ensure the correct feeis paid.
VAIJUATION$ 0 $ 10.c00$ 10,001 - $ s0, oo0$ 50, 001 - $ 150, OO0
$1s0, 001 $ s00, 000
$500, 001 91, 000, 000$ Over $1, 000, 000
DESIGN REVIEW AOARD APPROVAL E:XPIRES
APPROVAIJ I'NI-'ESS A BUII,DING PERITTIT ISIS STARTED.
Lhe accurat,e
FFF
' + ZU.UU
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00. 00
ONE YBAR AFTER FINAI,
ISSUED AIiTD CONSTRUCTION
/tela
ulr;rle c"s*aL
.QF OWNER(S) :
ltc-ral6,rcN.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are t,cLime of submirr.al_of rhe onB apptifat:.on.Lr.ure or suDmlcEal .ot the DRB applipation. LaLer, whenapplyinq for a buiJ.ding permit.,-plbase identify bhe acc
rr. "*r-^""orco*rFrrrrr*c,
III.
A pre-application meeting with a member of the planningsEaff is encouraged to det.ermine if any addit,ional. i
application informaEion is neeided. IE is the applicant,sresponsibility to make an appointment wiLh the sLaff todetermine if there are additional submittaL reguirement,s.Please note Ehae a COMPLErE application $rill sLreamline therevi.ew process for your projecc.
In-addition to meeting .submittal reguirements, Lheappllcant must. stake and t.ape the project site Loindicat,e property lines, buitding lines and buildingcorners. AIl Erees to be removed must be Eaped. Ailsite capings and st.aking must be completed prior t.o theDRB site visit.. The applicant must ensure Lhat stakingdone during Ehe winter is not buried by snow.
The review process for NEW BUIIJDINGS normally requirestwo separat.e meeLings of the Design Review goardi.a
conceptual review and a final review.
Applicanes who fail to appear before Lhe Design ReviewBoard on their scheduled meeting date and who have noE.asked in advance Lhat discussion on their item bepostponed, will have their items removed from Lhe DRBagenda unt.il such Lime as the it,em has beenrepublished.
The following items may, at the discreLion of t,hezoning adminisLraLor, be approved by t.he CommunityDevelopment DeparLmerit staff (i.e. a formal hearingbefore Lhe DRB may noL be required) :
a. Windows, skylighcs and similar exterioJ changeswhich do noL alter Lhe exisLing plane of chebuildinq; and
b. Building addirions not visible from any oLher lotor public space. At the time such a pioposal issubmitted, appli.canus must, include 1etteis fromadjacenL property owners and,/or from the agenL foror manager of any adjacent condominium associationst.ating Lhe associaLion approves of Che addition.
If a property is locaLed in a napped hazard area (i.e.snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow,wetland, eLc. ), a hazard study must. be submitt.ed andthe owner musr sign an affidaviE. recogrnizing the hazardreport prior to the issuance of a building iermiC.Applicants are encouraged t.o check with a-f-own piurrrr.,prior Lo DRB application Lo determine the relationshipof t.he property Lo alt mapped hazards.
For a]1 residential construction:
a. Clearly indicate on t.he f loor p3_ans the insideface of t.he ex.t.erior st.rucEural walls of thebuilding; and
b. Indicate with a dashed line on the siLe plan afour foot distance from the exterior faci of thebuilding walls or supporting columns.
ff DRB approves the applicaLion with conditions ormodifications, all condit.ions of approval must beaddressed prior to Lhe applicat,ion- ior a buildinqpermi L .
A.
B.
c.
D.
I
t
iil
*rarrr-.wT|
DAIE I
CIIECXS MADE PAYAALE TO TO\}'N OF VAIL
/|coaxt{T!to.rrM !(r. trx caxrlr. lurrl,
0l 000041540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $5.00
0 r 0000 424r 5 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE $54.00
0r 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE $r9.0u
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $37.00
0l 000042415 UNIFORM FIRE CODE $36.00
0l 000042415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE $37.00 I
ot 000042415 OTIIER CODE BOOKS
0t 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS (MYLARS)$7.00
0l 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES $0.25 I
0t oo00 424t2 SruDIES
0l 000042412 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM $5.0O
0t 000042371 PENALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTIONS
0l 0000 41332 PLAN REVIEW RE-CHECK FEE t$40 PER HR.1
0t 0000 42332 OFF IIOURS INSPECTION FEES
0l 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
0 I 0000 41413 SICN APPLICATION FEE $20.00
0l 000041413 AL'LII'I'IONAL SIGNAGE FEE I$I.OO PER SO.FT.I
0t 0000 42440 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION .a0l00qo4rtJlDRE+AID DESIGN RIIVIEW BOARD FEE Z)--4)-0r oofiF*?r?T rl,rvEsTrGATIoN FEE (BUt LDING)
3l 0000 451lo TOV PARKING FUND
ot ooo0 22027 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPENSER FUND* 0l 0000 2llt2 T4IABLE @ 4% (STATE)
* 0l 0000 41010 TAXABLE @ 4% (TOWN)
0l 0000 42371 BUILDING IM/ESTIGATION
OTIIER
f'!;C A.T'fLICATION FEES
0 r 0000 41330 ADDITIONAL GRFA "250'$ZUU.UU
0 t 0000 4r 330 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $200.00
0 I 0000 4l 330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION TLESS TIIAN IOOSOFT:]s200.00
0l 0000 41330 EXIERIOR ALTERATION [MOR.E TI{AN IOO SQ.FT.]$5U).00
0l 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTDISTRIET [NEW-sl.)00.u0
0t 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRATNMJOR ANIEND til.u,o.oo
0t 0000 4t330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMINOR AMENDI $200.00
0l 0000 4l 330 SUBDIVISION
0t 0000 41330 VARIANCE $250.00
0l 000041330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS $250.00
0l 000041330 KE. ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER
ITOTAL:
..IMMFNT(.
/T\.-.&-cAsB r-,,ff4(f'".rt
I
I
'(,
TEIJF{ CIF |.JFI I L-
Fliscel laneous Cash
B3-F7-?5 E3: l6:3?
EetrEirtt + 1d,9f,1f,
Flc,:f'unt. S f,|.: S 4'-145
I.JIELE I:I:IH5TE\.T!F:E FEE
Flrrir,un l. tendered :'
I iem paid
E1EEEB413]lEEE
f,h.:nge r*turrred ::
THFI}{l<
IE. BA
Rmoun t paid
?8. BB
i:i, t[1
1/ElJ
I
;
I
E
IV*ur cgshi*r F:EFTHII
R-ECEIPT - The Town of Vail
Permit Numbers
1'
llOW PAID-Cash-Check
I
46547
RECEIVED FROM
P.5
{
2&981
THE G(N,ERNOR
Uru.t LTNTERN
Hobhtr 29"
Widthi tl"
Ertendrr 15"
tl candehbra bare bulbr
a
20-9n
IHT GOIYENNOR
rAALL |INIERN
Hlithls 25"
Widthr l01t'
htrndr: 13'
3 candel.bra bele bulbr
Fnbhl Folished Bra$, Anlique Bns5,
Copper tbrde Antique \brde or
Elack Pearl Ged page zl)
Glarl; Clear Acrylic' 3 f<; Qx-lot€
zs-P dq#)
flnbh! Pollshed B|est Atltlqus Ersss,
Copper \,€rd€, Antlqu€ ltrde or
Elack Pcarl
cler$ Cl€er A[rylic
-
t0.983
ITIE GOVEINOR
F(xif LANIIRN
Heighk 2Eh"
rMdrh 12"
4 endelabra base bulbs
finishc Polishsd Brass, Antique Bn$,
feppsr \ffie Antigue \,!rde or
Elscl Pearl
clai$ Cleir Acrylic
{
30-973
THE GOVIRNOR
POST TANTERN
ltclthrr ?6"
Widlhr lOlt "
3 q,rndelrbn base bulbc
Finish: Pollrhcd 8ra*, Anrique Bras,
Coppet \brdq Antlque \&rds or
Black Prrrl Gec page 22)0l*l: €lerr Acrvlld
l5 (9, 6loU ftrll | .L.tYr'/\.
FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY
FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
(NOV. 2, 1982)
\- nrtatntHc
WALL
8176' r
8177,8'
(cRouND)
{;'...:
,ttlt)cA
8177.O'
EDGE OF
PAVEMENT
qo
I
LANDSCAPING/OPEN SPACE EI
(sEr aoorc 610, PAGE 2t
h-uota\ fatlrs
50' J
CENTERLINE
CREEK SETBACK
NOTE:
SPAL STAIR IS TO
#,Bf8,I#5'f5"
HERE
d
)
9\
tr
a
s
t
D ravag;*qta. ** ar. + V
Pva axrahl4 cat)AtcuSr.J
I-tl-.
T
6
\
TRASH ENCLOSURES
BELOW
8197.4'
(TOP OF EAVE)
81 78.2'r-ur
(GROUND)
,?'l^ut
at.t t +' Sl1ae
!r+*3 :bae-lt- fp
ca^aLitti."r
MANOR VAIL
PROVIDE HEAT HAAT EXTERIOR UALr
LOT 7
oO
r.,
Ot
oor;(t,
I
|rJ
oI
m
F-)
O
z.
oo
o
o
o
wooD
WALK
SEWER MANHOLE
RIM ELEV. = 6180.6'
llr.M UM
&\'*) L*^A+eale
4 yvczA +oA
tvstirrcn b
flcar<+;6
gufp all
a)wf,o* bo,^t/<rr
I
I / ,,E uorkc[,'oJ|[.(
f cou& /e*/ +h=t
k ieqwqo\e $s4 o Me(
oP 3 €M^fu'Ms <N- a6@
rv /d"z f ,*f Q^f / .
i - cq+ /n q rtc er-41/
t - qf feq.r + *'1"/
t-qf sel€ e,r>{fy
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE
i
CREEK DRIVE
(40' R.o.w.)
0.05338 ACRES
483 GORE CREEK
8179.2'
tYlovc
LIGHT POLE
25.00
LOT g 5oD
GORE
@ txv. ELEV. = 8168.8'
Ooesign Review Rctio*orm
TOWN OF VAIL
Calegory Number
Project Name:
Building Name:
/rtrt-r t i','lr ca (
f ,l k+{s .lo .r Z;'i c.l l'..{-{" t n
/<Xql.g- 1c
Owner. Address and Phone:
ArchitecvContact, Address and Phone:
Legaf Description: to6{Fk1 Block * Subdivision
Project Street Address:C:r.,fe C-one
Comments:
Zone Districr l4/ " -
*o,onrr, noL *'rPtX]"
Seconded by:
NrApproval
fl Disapproval
! Statf Approval
Conditions:lA i *: /v1c,t-t(
I-2
-,'(JrL w;{A
C., T ( .;1",;r.'*
'o{t
bwn Planner
-fttt t?ce-s-/
L ,r"' c le +A
!t,.
I \.1
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:An appeal of a staff decision regarding Design Review Board application
proceclures, and Temporary Certificate ol Occupancy collaleralization
requirements pertaining to the Thain development proposal, located at
483 Gore Creek Drive/Lots 8A, 8 B, and g, Texas Townhomes, Vail
Village 4th Filing.
Appellant: Jay Peterson, representing Helen Chatfield and Diana
DonovanPlanner: Jim Curnutte
I. INTRODUCTION
Jay Peterson, on behalf of Helen Chatfield and Diana Donovan, owners of Lots 7A and 78,
Texas Townhomes, is appealing staff's interpretation of the Design Review Board (DRB)
application procedures as well as Temporary Certificate of Occupancy collateralization
requirements pertaining to the Thain developmenl proposal located at 483 Gore Creek
Drive/Lots 8A, 8 B, and 9, Texas Townhomes. Vail Village 4th Filing.
Chapter 18.66.0304 (Appeal of Administrative Actions) states that:
"Appeal from any administrative action or delermination by the Town Manager
or the zoning administrator pursuanl to provisions to this title may be liled with
the PEC by any resident or property owner following such action or
determination. In event of appeal. the commission, after receiving a report from
the Town Manager or zoning adminislrator, may confirm, reverse, or modify the
action of the Town Manager or the zoning administrator. A hearing shall not be
required. The failure of lhe commission to act within thirty days of the filing of
an appeal shall be deemed concurrence in the action of the Town Manager or
the zoning administrator."
The Thains own two units localed at lhe easternmost end of the Texas Townhomes. They
have received all necessary Town approvals (DRB and building permit) in order to proceed
with their tear down/rebuild of Units 8A and 88 on the tot. During the June 1, 1994 DRB
meeting, Mr. Peterson, on behalf ol his clients, expressed a concern that the existing spiral
staircase, which was localed hall on the Thains' property and half on the Chatfield/Donovan
property, not be removed as a result of the proposed redevelopment. Although the spiral
staircase would not longer be necessary lo provide access lrom any floor on the Thains
property, it is the only means ol egress lrom the second story deck of Helen Chatfield's unit.
In response to this concern, Lynn Fritzlen, the Thains' architect, agreed to preserve the spiral
staircase in its existing location and provide a privacy screen around it on the Thains property.
r''i ir"
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
February 27,1995
kl, I p@ve lotqtLe
On February 6, 1995, Jim Curnutte on behall of the Town, wrote a letter to Rick Rosen, who
represents the Thains, for the purpose ol identifying the outstanding items that must be
finalized prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) for either of the
Thain residences. The Town's letter was also intended to respond to Mr. Rosen's inquiry
regarding the possibility of receiving a TCO belore ihe spiral staircase was put on the buildi:;;,
since Mr. Rosen indicated that the Thains no longer wished to install the spiral staircase on
the building, per the approved plans. on Page 2 of the February 6th letter, (see attached
copy), the Town indicated that it was in receipt of the Thains' application to go before the DRB
in order to request the complete removal ol the spiral staircase. The Town indicated that if
the DRB granted approval of the amendment to remove the staircase, that would resolve the
TCO issue, however, if the DBB felt that the staircase needed to remain on the new building,
as shown on the approved plans, then stafi would be agreeable to granting a TGO for the
Thain residence provided that the value of the staircase, and its installation on the building, be
bonded and that lhe staircase eventually be installed within the next few months.
Additionally, the Town pointed out to Mr. Rosen that, as currenlly submitted, since half of the
spiral staircase was located on property owned by Helen Ghatfield and Diana Donovan they
technically were required to be co-applicants in the removal application, and that a letter
indicating their approval of lhe reguest was necessary. Based on a previous conversation
with Rick Rosen, the Town also included a statement that the only way the Thains could
proceed with an application for the removal of the staircase, without the adjacent property
owners permission, would be il the Thains request only included that halt of the staircase
which was located entirely on the Thains property.
On January 28, 1995, Jim Curnutte received a letter lrom Rick Rosen indicating his desire to
modify his DRB application to include only the portion of the staircase located on the Thains
property. lt was at this time that staff determined that although the request to remove half of
the spiral staircase did not make sense functionally, and may not prove to be architecturally
acceptable to the DRB, the application was complele and was scheduled for DRB
consideralion on February 15, 1995.
On February 14, 1995, statf received the letter of appealfrom Jay Peterson disputing staff's
decision to allow the Thains to proceed to DRB to remove only that half of the staircase
located on the Thains property. lt is Mr. Peterson's contention that even the half of the
staircase located on the Thains property is jointly owned by his clients and the Thains, and
that no application for removal or alteration could be made without his clients and the Thains
review and approval. Mr. Peterson also believes that the Town should not allow the Thains to
receive a TCO until the spiral staircase is attached to the building and is fully functional to his
clients.
For the Planning and Environmental Commission's (PEC) information, staff has recently
received a number ol requests for TCOs when certain cosmetic improvements on the building
have not been cornpleted. On September 13, 1994, the Town established a written policy
(which went into eflect on November 1, 1994) which outlined the requirements necessary al
the time a TCO was requested, though certain outstanding improvements were nol completed
prior to the time a TCO is requested. This policy (see attached copy of September 13, 1994
memorandum) requires a financial and contractual guarantee at the time of TCO for all
outstanding cosmetic improvements, including items such as painting, landscaping, paving,
undergrounding utilities, stucco color coats, etc.
cipecvnemos\.tharn.227
TOWN OFVAIL
o='
F!I-E COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21 38 / 479-2 r 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 6, 1995
Deparnnent of Community Developtnent
Gk{*e z/r/rs
4p frrK*(furt
Mr. Rick Rosen
P.O. Box 4137
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Thain Residences, Lols 8 and 9, Vail Village 4th Filing
Dear Rick:
This letter is in response to your letter to me dated January 20, 1995 regarding the
outstanding items that must be tinalized prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy (TCO) for lhe Thain residence. The following issues are planning related items
and do not include Building Department requirements necessary for a TCO:
1. As you know, Lighting Ordinance No.9, Series of 1993 regulates all exterior
lighting on a property. To date, no exlerior lighting has been approved for the
Thain residences. Although a parlial lighting application has been received
from lhe architect, additional information must be provided with regard to
number of fixtures, localion. lurrinous area and source lumens belore staff can
determine compliance with lhe Lighting Ordinance. As mentioned to you during
our meeting lasl week. the maximum number of exterior light fixtures allowed
on the Thain property is three.
2. A revised landscape plan must be provided which shows, in addition to the
landscaping shown on the original site plan, lhe addition of large shrubs to be
installed under the evergreen tree which has been limbed-up during
construction. The Thains will then enler inlo a Developer Agreement with the
Town in order to bond the value of the estimated cost of the landscaping shown
on the revised landscaping plan. The landscape estimate must also include the
eslimated cost ol the Design Review Board (DRB) requirement lhat an arborisl
assess the condition of all landscaping on the property (in the spring) to
determine the "survivability" of the lrees. Also included in the Developer
Agreement would be the dollar amount of any asphalt damage to the parking
lot, which may have occurred during construction. The anrount of the bond will
equal 125% of the wrilten cost estimate provided lor staff review and approval.
The Developer Agreement will allow the Thains to delay complelion of the items
specified therein untilJune 30, 1995, not the spring of 1996 as indicated in your
letter.
o
Mr. Rosen
February 6, 1995
Page Two
3. As you know, I have discussed the possibility of bonding the value of the
exterior spiral staircase in order to obtain a TCO prior to its placement on the
slructure with Gary Murrain, Chiet Building Official, and Mike Mollica, Acting
Director of Community Development. Although staff has agreed that the
bonding may be accomplished, we feel that the six month deadline for
resolution of this matter requesled in your letter, is excessive. lam aware that
you have made an application lor February 1sth DRB review and approval to
remove the staircase. lf that approval is granted, the matter will be resolved at
that time. Staff would recommend that you do not request a TCO on the
building until after the February 1sth DRB meeting when it will be determined
whether or not removal of the stairs is acceptable. I understand that Tom
Moorhead, Vail Town Attorney, has contacted you recently regarding his
recommendation that lhe Thains attend the February 15. 1995 DRB meeting.
With regard to the above-mentioned DRB application, staff would remind you
that the complete removal of the spiral staircase, as currently described on the
DRB application and shown on the drawings submitted by Lynn Fritzlen,
requires the approval of Helen Chatlield and Diana Donovan. lf the Thains
shbuld decide lo remove only that portion of the staircase located on the
Thain's properly, then the application and drawings must be am* . Jed to reflect
that desire. In order to stay on schedule for the February 15, 1995 DRB
meeting, your amended application must be received by Friday' February 10'
1995.
I hooe the infornnation in this letter clarifies our previous conversations, however, if you should
require additional information regarding the above isst.res, please teel free lo conlact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
,!;*C**a%
Jim Curnutte
Tom Moorhead
Jay Peterson
l/ark Churchhill
File
XC:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMOFANDUM
conlractors, architects, landscape architects
Andy Knudlsen, Senior Planner
Mike Mollica, Acting Director ot Community Development
September 13, 1gg4iRevised February 14, 1995
Requiremenls at time ol Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
Effective November t' 't994 the Town of Vail will be requiring a letter of credit or an escrow account to
be established for all outstanding improvements prior to issuance ol a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy (TCO). The purpose of this change is to ensure that all of the condiiions made by the
Planning and Environmental commission (pEC) and Design Review Board (DRB) during the
developmenl review process are incorporaled into the final project and installed or consfucted. In an
effort to ensure lhat all improvements are completed, the Town will now require that a financial
guarantee be provided at the lime of TCO for outstanding cosmetic improvements. These would
include ilems such as painting, landscaping, paving, undergrounding utilities, a color coal for stucco,
etc. ltems nol included in this list, and which must be compleled prior to TCO include all exterior siding
ancl slonework on lhe building, weatherproof ing, etc.
Before a TCO can be issued, the foilorving items must be providect:
1. A @ntraclor's bid {or ail ouf slanding work.
2. A letter of credit or escrow account must be established tot 125aL of the amount shown
in the bid.
4. Finally, a Development lmprovement Agreement must be signed by the developer and
the project planner. The purpose of the Developer lmprovemenl Agreement is to
specify the amount ol money in lhe tinancial guarantee, to lisl the specific items that
are covered by the account, and to set the date that all outstancling work must be
compteted.
Any projects issued a TCO during the monlhs ot October. November, December, January, February,
March or April musl have the oulstanding improvements compteted by July 1st. Any projects which are
issued a TCO in May, June. July, August or Sepiember must have ihe improvements completed by
November 1st of lhat year.
Standard forms for the.lelter ot credit and the Devetoper lmprovement Agreement are available hom
the Department of Community Development. Please keep copies ot the folms on hand so that you
can provide the completed form lo the planner one week prior to requesling a TCO. The planner will
then verity that all of the work shorvn on the approved PEC and DRB plans is either complete or
accounted for in the Developer lmprovement Agreement.
Please call us if you would like to discuss any of the above. This Code section is found in lhe Design
Review Guidelines, under Section 18.54.070, which is shown on the back side ol this memo. lf you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact any of the statf in the Community Development
Department at 479-2138. Thanks for your cooperation.
:{ fis C& , *Y'?
Tlr*,lf** cJ^ooy" A Lo^nr
o a*, .,-c;
i:;;-::,'ir
(ereL d*r e,zh,re.
v 5*P
:,-- L,;,+ "'{,*/o.{l,-- L,;,+ "'{,*./o,, lE*peQ aF b* L fAoE :qt
* Gr-( Le#pf"- .{t*rt".- Ge@vist' *q*Aeb
-l[i/) 3' ts{-4eel LuqfCS -
=,Gz{ ceCe r. . sva.--ts(r; 4 t- Q(o*-tdLqcfr 6'{-qp,g- Fqyp ed{ ./- ,r**J j{.c i rt EJ ':.. ivi *:Ye.'*/' 'bc>{rsru;l(:*,i4 *"il
- tuat M,ut At^e *rxk ,,tqi€-q {e 6" *[aF yc-e)
.o"i.e ieae(y 4*; d<.y ee t &i} &.,*L\- Fr.bCq {6 paX* rn+,
(bh a-oLsQ-
Va,pg &14
,, KucD q.L-
oP qp|fo ua L.
CI;t ,-.*u.e *l* air *Y -fL,+ r*,6.rc,-c-61 ,Lrqy{-gntt7 ?.nA
SC
02/21/96 15:21 ED ooe
l1.F l.AW AFFTaE $ Oa
'T<{a{'("
Fcbrurry 24, 1995
SEI\IT VtA F CS|IULE 303ia?9jtlt2
Mr. Iin Curmrtte
Coomunity Dev€do[EHtt
Towr of Vail
?i Soutlr Frro@e Road Wesr
Vail, Colondo 8165?
I I ZO
LtHcoLN lTilf "
gur.rE t Ina
C/Fdr tF '-uLor|AFC
BOtOt
f dL :Ce Al! r 0OO
FIX :lOJ O93 O.r I t
YIIL
to aOia 4t Ct
v^r L goLoiADo
trGSt
tl! tOl dtr rtalJ
- t*5 ,+{LA (o
-- 6V=u&-
S-/ --(.'"rv4L\4'u!?
,'l=t^:@ $c "ry
Rc: Thain Resi<leuce
Lorq I end 9, Vail Vilhge Fnrrth Filiqg
Drnr Jiro:
As you rru aw*rp, I lnve suhmltanl rn epplicetiou !o Deeigu Rwieve Boord frrr o rnilor altcratiorl
I a prviursly appovcd phn" submissior wa$ rrade on Janury 2lrd for a herring wltb DRB on
Febwary 15' 1995. This *pplicatiou wer *ubsequmtly sppr*rled by -\ pctrnon to-tlc fl".;.gad Ervbruueul Comrrirsiou.
It mv appean thar Iey aod I tuve resolved the differcrcs betwcco oru clieus. cooocqucady,
the apFlicedso to DR.B for Eodiffcrd@ ro tbe rpr extcdor of Uoit E and dc rcrwval rri rr: ipimr
staircrse.uow_apptan ro be a noot issuc. Ascordingly, it is wfth rl'rr tomfi th|: t rapcctfollyrxlunt Ae vidqknunl of orrr DnB app[odon.
Witlr&rur*l of the qrglicrtiou should void tbc n:cd lior fay's epgcrl sr PEC o! rhc issue ol sulr
rpproval fctr scbcdulitg of rhc DRB heariug. The sesoud issur rclative m Jry's appcrl (TCo
bonding $quirsooni) should lloo bc a rrno-irsua !ow. ,r$ prrr uf our €rc@ilt, tbC firilc ncvc
a3reed m reilslall the spinl slairca"se. Muk Chruchill rd Diate Donovsn arc schcr&led !o Etrr$ tbe di3 to finaliz: placcurctt of thc stairr*c, Aftrr ttu plu:eoenr ls fntr1166, ttrc uilOr
modlffcrtions to the sroe witl be urdc. It ir aoricitE&d thnt this work will be cooploccl
irnmcdiatcly. Coosequeotly, ir ie ruy uuuug opiniou lbar e bODd is Eot lcceC*ry toi fne
rpirslallation 0f tbe strdn$e. I havo diecrssed this sroc inftrcaticr witb Jry.
Finally, now drrt tle gaircsse ieore is rcsohr€d, the Tt*im illeod to rtraightco tbe privnsy r,rinll.
lf 1ru rr*all, DRB greuorJ uuulitiurral apprcvat o[ Dcceeb€r '/, lgg4 lor s cbrlgu. This wu
cooditioned oo resolviry thc stritcs$e i*srr (w[icD hrc beeD cmplobd) and stafi rplwal.
Acr:ordiugly, iocoal rcqr*st is tlltdr for approvat for rhe strsig[B1ulg of flre wall,
Tbrok for yrow' hclp.
YOurS vcry rl|rly,
&ICIIARD P. ROSEN, P.C.
VtdL-
Ricbul P. Roseo
/hs
ot cOUtl 5EL: E!ftOC, KArZ. PReCO, LggX. titOtgoN t 3tLVtlri^tr. F.B.
I
BATLEY, Ilennwc & Purunsont
A PRoFEssroNAL ConpourroN
AFTon\reysArLAw
LINCOIN CENTEB
1660 LINCOIN STREET. SUTIE 9176
DEIYVE& COLORADO 8O!8{
TELEPHONE (S0S) 8tt7.t660
FACSIMILE (808) tg?-{r007
TO:
FROMs
DATE:
RE:
l'lE!,tORANDUI.f
JIII{ CURNUTTE, TOWN OF VAIL
JAY K. PETERSON
FEBRUARY l_4, 1995
THAIN TOWNHOUSE
VAIL NATIONIL EANE AL,DG.
l0r gorrfn I'noNTAGE RoAIr WE81 SLTE
vAu+ coLoRADo 810!7
TBIJPIIONE (908) a?0.0092
FACSIMILE (EO8) 17S.UC7
Dear Jirn:
The undersigned as attorney for Helen Chatfield and Diana Donovan
hereby appeal.s your decision to a1low the Thains to proceed to the
Design Review Board for the permanent rernoval of the stairway
shared between Lots 8 and 9.
The undersigned also appeals your decision to allow a letter ofcredit be placed at the time of T.C.O. in lieu of the replacement
of the stairway which was wrongfully removed.
,- 02/09/95 10:20 8S2 1900
;HE LAw oFFtcI5 oF TICHAiD F.
i'r:
roj$3#'r.C,
Jannary 29, l99j
SENT VtA tacsIMILE n3.1n2452
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Commuaity Dwelopment
Tnryn of Veil
75 $outh Froatage Road Wcstotxvt' Vail, Coloratto g-i6s7
I r It
LrNcoLN r'HEEr Bel Thsln lcsldcrcc
E ,r , y ,i t , oo Lots E eul 9, Vail Villagc Fourth Fitiug
DENvTR cfiLoRADo DEAT JiM:
to?oi
As you f,re aware, I have submitt€d rn application m Desiga Rcvicw Board for a rninor'/32-lloo 1lj1'lation f a^p:vious:!y. arpproved plan.- Submission wu-made on Januuy ZirO for a,!L ie3 r3r , oco beerirg with DRB on Febnrary 15, lyts,
f^x sor r'3 0'r" upon rcvicw of you lerwr of February- 0, lg9), pleasc considerthis lener amodific*ionof pc DRB uppticmion. Ir is thc aplicac,s iarent to modifu onty rhe portion of th;--=sBlrcase that i8 dt*hed to thcir prbpcny. If it is nece*sary, tle iaircire *iX U* atouo
ya I L to rdlect rhis 15qp61.
P e ! o x 4 t 37 The other itcms discu$sed iDctuded the fhllowing:
vA I L C O l.O RA E o
r r..0 t Thcre will be no requirement to bond tbc danragc rrr drc asptalt, TCI CaDtc
causcd thp damage end should be helrt accountahte. I will lavc Muk -Chruchill
wrie aleset $tatang thc same, la rbc urcurlimc, I wlll atso try to get someone hom TCI to
r r L tor ..7 | | s.o acknowledgc the irstallation of the cablc,
2- The erborisl end additional rarge sbrubs were a later req'irernent of DRBup0u^approval ofsubsequent chugcs to the previouoty approved Uuitaiog plms, ardthcrefore, a noceacary clement oftbe TCO boud procese.
3.. The DRB hearing ir rtill scl*dutcd tbr Fobruary lith. shoultl this ohauge,
someone tiom your ofticr will uorify me of the samc.
Thalk^c for your help, plerse cell if I missed tornething.
Yours very ruly,
RICHARD P, ROSEN, P.C.l-t'.Tt lltlJvv t-
Richard P. Rasen
fts
oF cor,rxEEL: ELftoE, KATZ, FnCcE|, LooK, MorSott il itLvEFlt H.,.c.
John A. and Carmcn il. Thaln
85 Old Roarlng Brcok Road
llt. Klsco, NewYork 10549
(914) 66&9555
January 31 , 1995
Mr. Jim Cumutto
Seniq Phnner
Town of Vail
Depailrnent of Gornrnunity Dwelopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
By Far (303) 479-2,052
Dear Mr. Gumutte:
We would like lo malc clear our posltbn on certain ilems lo be dlscussed at the Febnrary 15,1995 DRB meeting
rehting to our Texas Toyrnhome. We intend to hndscape our prop€ty in a rnanor consistent with the +nlily and
design of our unil. We are sure the resul wi]l be satisfactory to DHB and the town d Vail. We asked for sugges-
tbns on the landscaping fiom our naighbors at the semi-annual Texas Townhome As.sociation medhg hdd h
December 1994. We have not received any suggestions. We hope our neighbors wouH communicate directly
with us and not use lhe Town of Vail or the DRB as their personal communication channel.
We do not intend to reinstall the circular slairuay at the rear of our unit. lt serves m purpose lor r.rs and would be
a potenthl liabilily lo ns shouH someone renting the neighboring unit injure themsdves on it. We have offered to
give the stairway to our neiglrbors. We have offered to reimburse lhem for the cost of reindalling it. The decisbn
on if and where the strairway is reinstalled on Unit 7 is a decisbn of the owners of Unlts 7A and 78. The design
change lo the rear dek we are requesting is minor and shouH be non-controversial from DRB s point of view.
lf you have any questions, feel fiee lo call us directty or contact our attorney, Rick Rosen.
A. and Carmen M. Thain
cr: Rick Rosen
THE LAW OFFICES OF ircl{.lRD P,l|r
Ti!' '
""dil|.,F. C.
OINVER
| | 20
LINCOLN STREET
sutTE I loo
DENVER COLORADO
4o203
'rEL 303 432 r 900
FAX 303 E|63 04 r 2
PO BOX 4 | 37
VA IL COLOFADO
al65a
TEL 303 471 1940
January 28, 1995
HAND DELIVEREI)
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Thain Residence
Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village Fourth Filing
Dear Jim:
As you are aware, I have submitted an application to Design Review Board for a minor
alteration to a previously approved plan. Submission was made on January 23rdfot a
hearing with DRB on February 15, 1995.
My request is simple. I would like to be placed on the agenda first for this DRB
hearing. I have business in Denver that evening that can not be changed. An early
agenda item would greatly enhance my ability of making this meeting without being too
late.
As always, I appreciate your prompt attention to this request. Please call me and let me
know if this request will present any undue problems for Community Development or
DRB. Thanks.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. ROSEN. P.C.
(1,1 ; I
LLC
RiChard P. Rosen
ihs
OF COUNSEL: ELROO, XATZ, PREEO, LOOK, MOISON A SILV€RMAN' P C'
THE LAW OFFICES OF
RICHARD P. ROSEN, P.C.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
DENYER
I | 2()
LINCOLN STREET
SUITE l IOO
D E N V E R C O LO R A D O
80203
TEL 303 432 1900
FAX 303 863 04 | 2
PO BOX 4 | 37
VAIL COLORADO
I | 654
TEL 303 471 1940
January 23, 1995
HAND DELTVERED
Mr. Iim Curnutte
Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
I I2O LINCOLN STREET
sutTE I tOO
oENVER COLORAOO aO203
TEL 303 agz t900
FAX 303 a63 04 t 2
VAIL TEL 3O3 4'q 4,42
T'.t
Re: Thain Residence
Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village Fourth Filing
Dear lim:
I have asked that Susan Freedman from Fritzlen, Pierce & Briner deliver this letter and
application to your office. The application is for a minor design alteration to the Thain
Residence. The request is for a design change only. I am not asking DRB, not do I
believe DRB has the right, to rule on the legal merits as to whether the exterior spiral
staircase must be reinstalted.
The request is for the elimination of the spirat staircase that was part of the original
approval for this property. Additionally, the request includes modification to the exterior
privacy wall separating Lots 7 and 8.
In talking with Randy Stouder on Friday, it was determined tlat the revised rear
elevation as well as a revised site plan would accomplish the submittal requirements. If
this is not the case, please let me know asap.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. ROSEN, P.C.
Ltt ,<l/ t Alt
I l.{i.tl--F-
Richard P. Rosen
/hs
OF COUNSELi ELROO. KATZ. PREEO, LOOK, MOISON & 9tLVERMAN' P C
-_ a 1
AMPAD NO. 23.776 RECYCTED PAP'R
AMPAD NO. 2}7?T RECYCLEO PAPER
l:' lr
filz0tgl lt:tt
.rnHN a .
aot 1000
raittra t/rart{
DESIOII lllr"rEtf IoARD
TI{A I N
EI,TOD.TATZ EI.....-
DATE OE' URB MIIIII{G:
r taaf f att* t
o
orr0t
o
t!
AAAI??1 P- er
uw JAil 2319sb
rPPrrrcAlrof ' Tolfll oF vAl&' coton'lDo
DA'E Recr:r"-;'-::$V'-00lvl-lrl1' DEV' DEn
B.
I.
A.
c.
D.
t.
F.
?
TYPI OP REITEW: INff Congtsuction (S20o.uut
-31nor AlEeEaciur (130.00)
Jaarcloa (3s0.oo)
-concepEuar
ncvtew (f0l
rf eaoperCy ic alescribcd by a tneelt and boundc legrldrslriltiot, ptrase provtdc on a sepateLc sheet' lnd ai'cach
co thls rDPlicaLiun.
ADDRESS:@
IJEGAL DESbNIPBIONI LOt, 8 TNd 9
subdlvirioa@
ZONTNG:
ITAI{E OF APELICAI,ITI
Rl.oelc
P.c
PEE
{r ,l.l . lrtl
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200. 00
f400.00
0s00.00
OilE r'ElR aFTER fIil I'l
rsgsED il|D eofisErucatol{
t"'i
c.NAI{E OF
Mcriling
APPIJICAN'I' S !€FRESENtATIvE:
Address:
Phone JofllilS'.laqp
lI. NN{E qf Oi{}lttr(o) t
oilflEE f.S) 5r(iltral'grra:
Mailing Addrcil:
[ec acsoading co th3 gablc bclo]r, go rnlurc Elrc cortectic paid.
//9,
^PPLIeATrCrng
YIIlL NOt BE PROCEESUA ttItHOtU OnN:ER't grdnlt0l!
Coodonrialun Approval if appll,etble-
gRE fEE: DRD fie€, as Fhown above,l aac Co bc pald aL Elrcgiurc of ruburiteal of rhe DRB appltFaEiou. LeEor, rrhea
applying for a buildi.nE pernil. Dleasc ld?ntity the accurtBo
valuaclon of Ehe proposal , 3he ?orrn ot vail wiII adjurE tbe
/t
l
VAI/UATION$ c $ 1o.c0c$ru,00l-$ 50.000t 50,001 | 1so,oo0
$150,001 . S 500,000
f500,001 . $1.000.000$ Over 11,000,000
NESIGN NtI'IEW BOIID APPROVAIJ EXI.LIG:S
AFFROTIAT, ttrtlBSS A lurtOrNg ?E8ICE rC
IEE SClltsuuIJEi
lod.lt- Urard tax Suomitlll rnomo tlTl rol lrr r I
t8 l!rrR'!ED.
,i
TOWNOFVAIL RICEIPT NO.
DEPaRTtrtEr-TOFCotrttrltrN..lTl'DE\ELOPIIIENT
CIIECXS MADE PAYAALE TO TOWN OP VAIL
. ACCOI]NTNO.ITEM ' i lto.' ' ' :rl. TAxi "r-:j: coaTll .' II'TAL
0l 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $5.00
0l 0000 42415 UMFORM BUILDINC CODE $54.00
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE s39.00
0l 0000 4241 5 UNIF-ORM MECHANICAL CODE s37.00
0r 0000 424t5 UNIFORM FIRL CODE s36.00
0t 000042415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 5J7.0U
0l 0000 4241 5 OTIIER CODE BOOKS
0l 0000 4 548 BLUE PzuNTS (IUYLARS s7.00
01 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES !i0.25
0 t 0000 42412 STUDIES
ot 00u) 42412 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM $5.00
0l 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES / RE.INSPECTIONS
0l 0000 4t 332 PLAN REVIEW RE-CHECK FEE TS4O PER IIR.
0t 0000 42312 OFF IIOURS INSPECTION FEES
0l 0000 4t412 CONTRACTORS LICIJNSES FEES
0l 0000 4l4ll SIGN APPLICATION FEF-s20.00
0l 0000 4 4t3 ADDITIONAL SIGNAGI] FEI-J IS I.OO PER SO.FI
0l 0000 41440 *VTC ART PROJECT DONATION t1 ,-.-
,,0ro000 4 )J tr 4RE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE -{a-4trffi171 INVL,STICATION I. I--E ( I]UILDING)
3l oo0045ll0 TOV PARKING FUND
ot oooo 22027 I0V NEwSPn PhR DISPLNSI:R FUNI)r 0l 0000 2l I t2 TAXABLE (o 4o/. (STATE
* 0l 0000 4t010 TAXABLE @ 4% (TOW.\..
0l 0000 42371 BUILDING INVESTICATION
}TIIER
PEC APPLICATION FEES
0l 0000 4 ADD]TJONAL CRFA ''250'li200.u0
0l 0000 4 130 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT s200.00
0l 0000 4 330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION ILESS TITAN IOO SO.FT.$200.00
0l 00004 330 EXI.I:KIOR AL'l.L.RAllUN MORIr TIIAN 100 SO.FT.s500.00
01 00004 330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT [NEW s I ,500.00
01 0000 4 330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TMAJOR AMEND s I ,000.00
0l 0000 4 3J0 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TMINOR AMEND $200.00
0t 0000 4 3i0 SUBDiVISION
g 0l 0000 4 330 VARIANCE s250.00
0l 0000 41330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS $250.00
0l 000041330 RE. ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER
lloTALi 2( l
C()MM 8Nl5 i
.J c--\ r
t"' ,- , ,*.0,5 'ftU, ,ornr-_,*a.rrt- -W
,'.
i
!
I
i
TElrlFt GF Uflll-
t'liscel laneous Cash
81-25-95 1:
ReceiFt * 1661SF
Fccsunt* CH*5llB
RITK ROSEH\.DRB FEE
Hnrr-run t tendered :l
Ites Paid
glgEErg4l33l66E
f,hange returned
28. BA
frroutt paid
zg.gs
B. EE
THFTH|< l/{fIJ
Vour caghier REATHF
- Thc Town ofVrll
DATE ,vf 5 N? {8S88
RECEIVED FROM
pcrmitNumbersffi
FW PllO-Cash-l
page
i{
Q
E
o
E
I
(r)
*
i\r
E
B
I
(\l
E
s
tvI
E
@
GI
N
/
* 2000 MM (78 94") LONG BAR
HAMMEBED ON CORNERS TO GO
WITH ABI 42124 + ART. 42liO
,IERCED BAR LENGTH L = 2OOO MM (78 3t4")a-E$(
e hot pierced bar, formed
rng successlve "dritts" re-
esenls the initial utilisationf wrought ion applied to
rchitecture.
Almost nothing has changed
in the method of production
nor in the aeslhetic appeal
and security that these bars
guaranteed to the windows of
ancient Rome and many me-
diaeval cities throughout Eu'
rope, and can now guarcntee
IO US,
Amazingly lhey possess the
ability of marrying equallv with
ancient restoralions and also
with the most futuristic of ar-
rhilpalt trAl arinaE r\l< ra ^.,n
(
!'
P.
I
(;
II
T
R
I
t'
It
o
D
U
C
T
I
t)
N
I'
o
H
I
li
,r
.I:
I)
.'r ).
t !l-E 7 -t't^1COPY
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 1 3 8 / 479-2 I 3 9
FAX 303-479-2452
February 6, 1995
D e p arnne nt of C ommunity Developme nt
't.
2.
6X"1. -r, zfz/rs
-1p B rrk*(/ttrl
Mr. Rick Rosen
P.O. Box 4137
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Thain Residences, Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village 4th Filing
Dear Bick:
This letter is in response to your letler to me dated January 20, 1995 regarding the
outstanding items that must be tinalized prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy (TCO) for the Thain residence. The following issues are planning related items
and do not include Building Department requirements necessary for a TCO:
As you know, Lighting Ordinance No.9, Series of 1993 regulates allexterior
lighting on a property. To date, no exterior lighting has been approved for the
Thain residences. Although a partial lighting application has been received
from the architect, additional information must be provided with regard to
number of fixtures, location, luminous area and source lumens before staff can
determine compliance with the Lighting Ordinance. As mentioned to you during
our meeting last week, the maximum number ol exterior light fixtures allowed
on the Thain property is three.
A revised landscape plan must be provided which shows, in addition to the
landscaping shown on the original site plan, the addition of large shrubs to be
installed under the evergreen tree which has been limbed-up during
construction. The Thains will then enter into a Developer Agreement with the
Town in order to bond the value of the estimated cost ol the landscaping shown
on lhe revised landscaping plan. The landscape estimate must also include the
estimated cost of the Design Review Board (DRB) requirement that an arborist
assess the condition of all landscaping on the property (in the spring) to
determine the "survivability" of the trees. Also included in the Developer
Agreement would be the dollar amount of any asphalt damage to the parking
lot, which may have occurred during construction. The amounl of the bond will
equal 125Y. of the written cost estimate provided for staff review and approval.
The Developer Agreement will allow the Thains to delay completion of the items
specified therein untilJune 30, 1995, not the spring of 1996 as indicated in your
letter.
Mr. Rosen
February 6,
Page Two
1995
As you know, I have discussed the possibility of bonding the value of the
exterior spiral staircase in order to obtain a TCO prior to its placement on the
structure with Gary Murrain, Chief Building Official, and Mike Mollica, Acting
Director of Community Development. Although staff has agreed that the
bonding may be accomplished, we feel that the six month deadline for
resolulion of this matter requested in your letter, is excessive. lam aware that
you have made an application for February 1sth DRB review and approval to
remove the staircase. lf that approval is granted, the matter will be resolved at
that time. Staff would recommend that you do not request a TCO on the
building until atter the February 1sth DRB meeting when it will be determined
whether or not removal of the stairs is acceptable. I understand that Tom
Moorhead, Vail Town Attorney, has contacted you recently regarding his
recommendation that the Thains attend the February 15, 1995 DRB meeting.
With regard to the above-mentioned DRB application, stafl would remind you
that the complete removal of the spiral slaircase, as currently described on the
DRB application and shown on the drawings submitted by Lynn Fritzlen,
requires the approval of Helen Chatfield and Diana Donovan. lf the Thains
shbuld decide to remove only that portion of the staircase located on the
Thain's property, then the application and drawings must be amended to reflect
that desire. In order to stay on schedule for the February 15, 1995 DRB
meeting, your amended applicalion must be received by Friday, February 10,
1995.
a
I hope the information in this letter clarifies our previous conversalions, however, if you should
require additional information regarding the above issues, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
Jim Curnutte
xc: Tom Moorhead
Jay Peterson
Mark Churchhill
File
T}IE LAW OFFICES OF RICHAFD P. ROg E N, P. C.
RFCE/VL-i
I il q^
January 28, 1995
HAND DELTVERED
Mr. Jim Curnufte
Communiry Development
Town of Vail
Village Fourth Filing
Dear Jim:
As you :ue aware, I have submitted an application to Design Review Board for a minor
alteration to a previously approved plan. Submission was made on January 23rd for a
hearing with DRB on February 15, 1995.
My request is simple. I would like to be placed on the agenda first for this DRB
hearing. I have business in Denver that evening that can not be changed. An early
agenda item would greatly enhance my ability of making this meeting without being too
late.
As always, I appreciate your prompt attention to this request. Please call me and let me
know if this request will present any undue problems for Community Development or
DRB. Thanks.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. ROSEN, P.C.(tL-
Rosen
'
-' )-;
l^
K]
/1
L/*
D'NYER
| | 20
LINCOLN STREET
surlE I roo
OENVER COLORAOO
ao203
TEL 303 a32 1900
FAX 303 863 04 | 2
PO BOX 4 | 37
vatt coLoflaoo
a r 65a
TE! 303 47t 1940
75 South Frontage Road West
OF COUNSEL. ELROO. KAIZ' PREEO. LOOX. MOISON C SILVERMAN' F C
THE LA\M OFFICES OF
rffi',. l-
O1,,;
trcHtRD*4
Ianuary 20, 1995
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail. Colorado 8i657
Re: Thain Residence
Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village Fourth Filing
Dear lim:
Thank you for meeting with me yesterday.
I wanted to confirm our conversation to make sure I have the facts correctly. Please let
me know as soon as possible if any part of the following is incorrect.
There are currently three outstanding items that must be finalized prior to issuance of a
TCO for the Thain residence. This is not to say that the residence is completed. Those
t}ree items included (1) acceptable lighting pursuant to Ordinance No. 9, Series of 193,
(2) final landscape plan and applicable bond, and (3) exterior staircase issue.
The lighting issue should be resolved by the architect and the owner. Lynn Fritzlen will
be providing you the necessary information relative to number of fixtures, location,
luminous area, and source lumens.
OENl,IR
I | 20
LINCOLN STREEI
SUtTE l rOO
OENVER COLORADO
ao203
TEL 303 432 r900
FAX 303 863 04 | 2
YA I L
PO BOX 4 | 37
VAIL COLORADO
E | 654
TEL 303 4-'1 1940
DRD a '*//7----+
.,r --1 The proposed landscaping will require a final plan and a bond in the amount of 125% of
, lt frt'l ' the estimateO cost of ihe iandscaping. Given ihe time of the year, the bond will be
. Uf I provided pursuant to a developer's agreement with specific deadlines for completion of
Nrf flfl il, the installation of the landscaping. I would ask that as a minimurn the Thains be given
' n . t Lf '- -,tF until Spring 19Jb for finalization of the same. NO I -- \,(.6€ l??t
.nF -4 * rtU : * The exterior staircase will not be installed prior to request for issuance of the TCo. As
or"l+t" ,. lF you :ue aware, the Thains continue to attempt to resolve the dispute with the adjacent' 1 V- .\ property owner over the location of the staircase. As such, a bond will be provided via
t tk '
,tF I the same instrument to be used above wherein aS-anounlraua\to the installation of the
^h staircase will be provided. A deadline of six (6) months is reqy'ested for a hopeful
If the above correctly confirms our conversation, please let me know. I would like to
prepiue a draft agreement for the Town's review. Also, I will be submitting an
OF COuNsEL: ELROD, KAtZ, PREEo, LoOK, MolSON & StLVERMAN' P c'
Mr. Jim Cumune
January 20, 1995
Page Two
application to DRB for a minor alteration to the previously approved architectural plans.
I am only requesting a design alteration. DRB is not being asked tojudge the merits of
whether or not the Thains have a requirem€nt to reinstall the staircase.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. ROSEN. P.C.
lt t I
TrLt lL__ ___ .
Richard P. Rosen
/hs
a
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303:479-2452
January 11, 1995
Deparnnent of Community Development
Ms. Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Documenlation of Design Review Board (DRB) action and condilions of approval
regarding changes to the previously approved plans for the proposed remodel of the
Thain residences, Lots 8A,88, and 9, Texas Townhomes, VailVillage lst Filing
Dear Lynn:
This letter is intended to document the conditions attached to the January 4, 1995 DRB
approval of the Thain residences amendments to the previously approved plans. Your
application 1o add a curved brick arch above the east side window, which is above the enlry
door, and to remove the previous condition of DRB approval requiring an awning window to be
added to the window above the entry door was approved unanimously by the DRB.
However, during their site visit to the Thain residences, the DRB noted that the brick corbelling
between the entry door and the window above has not bedn ingtalled per the approved plans.
The DRB has conditioned their approval of the above-referenced changes upon the addition of
he brick corbelling above the east side entry door, as originally approved.
The second condition of the DRB approval has to do with the landscaping changes you have
made to the property, including the limbing of the large evergreen lree located near the
southeast corner of lhe new building. The stafl and the DRB was assured by the applicant
that this tree would be protected throughout the conslruction of the new residences and would
not be limbed up, as currently exists. The DRB was also concerned wilh the damage to the
bees along the south side of the property, adjacent to the parking lot. As a condition of
approval, the DRB is requiring that large shrubs be installed under lhe eyergreen lree and a
new landscape plan be submitted which shows additional landscaping to compensate for the
damage which has been done during construction. This new plan musl be provided for staff
review and approval prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) for
the property. At the time a TCO is issued, staff will require a bond in the amounl of 125/o ol
the value of all landscape improvements which will not be complete at the time the TCO is
issued. ln the spring, before the bond is relurned, the applicant must have a qualified expert
assess the condition of all landsqaping and guarantee the replacement of any trees that the
expert believes will not survive. The replacement of any trees determined to have a low
chance of survival must be complele before the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy
for lhe building.
Senior Planner
xc: John and Garmen Thain
Mark Churchill
o
Ms. Frilzlen
January 11, 1995
Page Two
lf you have any questions, or need lurther clarification, of any of the conditlons imposed by
the DRB on January 4, 1995, please contacl mE immediately, in writing, so that we all have a
clear underslandlng of the informatlon whlch must be addressed prior to lhe issuartc€ of a
TCO for thE Thain residEncss remodel.
Sincerely,
$LCz,"^.'.Q,*t|^
Jim Cumutte.
Ir
Building Name:
lsign Review Action *t
TOWN OF VAIL
catesory trr.o", /7 on" t /q /q S
erq"aN^ ", -fi,q ln 0 n, /'; (u^,|/s 4tBl)
Project D€scription:
."'!,7a\ C .-t^
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecvoontact, Address and Phone:
Legal Descripti on: Uot/i,fu t8 Alock Subdivision zone District /Onf
project street A aar"ss' '/ 93 Gof p C' f e:< k 0/ r U Q
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Seconded by:
f;-= .r' gdpproval u:/C.. * c* rl_ r4j. _
O OU"OOr"-n
! StaffApproval
Conditions:coil,
,.- |J'/'Y)t''
-r{ =o*-DRB Fee Pre-oaid 7 /
+ar=[.' ;tki-, q: ,tti,;; *i,.r'J.'d rY.ua,e,{
*lu&(- a[*J e*rl-u"iet*.n i$/$GAo€r\) .ogq- L-qrte-
r 1: pcf f, ,4n*,u^t ?/ 4e- s[srl )q.CC CTJ*A
{',i,& ) herss / e kxnffi E u## &? :
ryF{,'c €/-}r lf /W,:
4sir*' t.,'ce{ $'Ff *t'l
ff.s..s- gg: . L,}q. 6,' c ;4y
* q*TgrooO{gq -i kX.
,*it"*4*,nt#o tr +e,tf
U €et'Q c(, Frrrse CFrF C?e rF r$ald
0rt,( ute/Cg ,',-,!./ \I rt t/
ii l-ALL-
.,\J.; oll | | -'Mtfra.- Cap4 Fe$ irole. ')L CoPFe{- a'*ptreVal I 'l -'it
r t / l"\ - . ",i *r,,brcak. uf ry r€$t ,, , /: * ilS {gn, 1sru#r-qlf..rT-, (.-,.. Cr};t ,p ,, iYt,r,'l{:i t\ t-n,f--- tr 1' t t ---
'l )tl'itr tt'' n'.t" {.e\\fG' -i {*e i . 1 uO L i rc 1,", A't'@e.f-.
1/ , t t, .Srtrun,o qLf t c,t a c-da;.:.t/ar +e ; f*
"rrorol
Co l&
T PRo']ECr rNFoRl'ArroN:'' T[.i 1'ilji,ri,ii l:i i, ,ii.piA. DESCRIPTION: Mti11lon ghanoes to window above eritiv lij !"' '; v 'rf T I
DATE OE DRB MEETING:
*********
IEIS .IPPIICS,TTON !'r!I. NOT BE ACCEPTEDItNtIL nIlL REoUIRED rNrOR!|ArrON rS SUAMr oEC 2 3 199{**********
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
Nevr Const,ruction ($200. 00)x Minor Alteration ($20.00)
Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
c.
D.
ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:I,ot 8&9 Block
Subdivlsion - Vail VllLaee 4th Fil
If propert,y is described bvdesqript,ion, please providdattach to this applii-ation.
ZONING:
Condomlnlurn Approval if appllcable.
a meet,s and bounds legalon a separate sheet and
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
9200.00 .
$400.00
$500.00
t.
G.
LOT AREA: If required, applicant must, provide a currentstanped survey showing lol area
NAME OF APPLfCANT: Carmen and John *-Mailing Address: g
ut. K:tsko. liJY 10549
T NAME 9F OWNERS: Garnen and John Thaln
*STGIIAIURE (S) :I'rarrj.ng Aoorestr': oJ uJ.q Koarl"nP SrooK Koao
105
,I.
K.p5a rlEr DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe tlme of, suiinitraL of pne ippiicirio". --r;;;;, whenapptying for a building- permirl'pteas- iaentiiv-iireaccurate valuation of the proposiL. The fown -of vaitwill adJust the fee_accoraing-io-the table-U.fo",'toensure the coriecr fee rs piia.- -^ :"1_"" t/# lel 4l
FEE SCHEDULE':
YALUATIONt o-$ 1o,oooI 10,001 - $ s0;000I 90,001 - $ 1s0;oo0
1199,001 - $ soo;ooo
$500, 001 - $1,000;000$ Over $1r 000,000
ls lsEJ q4
**NO APPEICATfON WfITIJ BE
Phone
dr\
* DEsrcN REvrElI BoeRD AppRo\rAJ., E(PrREs oNE YEAR Ar.rER FrNALAPPRO\TAI., UNLESS A .BUII.DING PERMI! IS ISSU''- Ir:IP COIISTRUCTTON ISSTAR,ITED.
PROCESSED WITSOUT OI{MR' S SIGNATTTRE
r-.
L
o
f iiEceIl.3nec'us Ca=h
I .-r; -r r_r ; rJ..:,
F,=.i-+i ri. + 1 F,f:'Fll
t-Ji-r._.r-r'-r IL. it r.-- t.. 'f
r;..15 t
trE rT:l trt.l E Ttrtri'tr i.::tr'T i.Jtrc". riFE, E:rE:i r-, !. LLL! 1! r .L r-'l.Lii* 5
iir',,-,' rr-, t t.1r,r'i.: r,:,,-i ': ?ri t:lr-r
I rem paid
lii i firjr:1841. :lf, 1 *i.ll:1
f:i-r.:,nq,i! r,:!i.r-rrnE,,j .:
Frrioun t p:id
:t. rSil
-t-Hslt-{}4 a/{fl-r
i r.,!r_r I I._.1 _i..1 | i. i:r i i..EH I nH
tcTownof
p: l4 I{f f6t?t
-I- tfll|t"l rf,F r-_Jtri I l_
RDCEIVEDFROM
DOLI.ARS $
Fermit Numbers
't -
trlw PruD-crsh-ctrecrlr lill I
o
FfL t c0PY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
January 11, 1995
Departnent of Community Development
Ms. Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Documenlation of Design Review Board (DRB) action and conditions of approval
regarding changes to the previously approved plans for the proposed remodel ol the
Thain residences, Lols 8A, 8B, and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 1st Filing
Dear Lynn:
This letter is inlended to document the conditions attached to the January 4, 1995 DRB
approval ol the Thain residences amendments lo the previously approved plans. Your
application to add a curved brick arch above the east side window, which is above the entry
door, and to remove the previous condition of DRB approval requiring an awning window to be
added lo the window above the entry door was approved unanimously by the DRB.
However, during their site visit to the Thain residences, the DRB noted that the brick cortrelling
between the entry door and the window above has not beein iftstalled per the approved plans.
The DRB has conditioned their approval of the above-referenced changes upon the addition of
the brick corbelling above the east side entry door, as originally approved.
The second condition of the DRB approval has to do with the landscaping changes you have
made to the properly, including the limbing of the large evergreen tree located near the
southeast corner of the new building. The stafl and the DRB was assured by the applicant
that this tree would be protected throughout the construction ol the new residences and would
not be limbed up, as currently exists. The DRB was also concerned with the damage to the
trees along the south side of the property, adjacent to the parking lot. As a condition of
approval, the DRB is requiring that large shrubs be installed under the evergreen tree and a
new landscape plan be submitte'd which shows additional landscaping to compensate for the
damage which has been done during construction. This new plan must be provided for staff
review and approval prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) for
the property. At the time a TCO is issued, staff will require a bond in the amount of 125/" ol
the value of all landscape improvements which will not be complete at the time the TCO is
issued. In lhe spring, before the bond is returned, the applicant must have a qualified expert
assess the condition of all landscaping and guaranlee the replacement of any trees that the
expert believes will not survive. The replacement of any trees determined to have a low
chance of survival must be complete before the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy
for the building.
Ms. Fritzlen
January 11, 1995
Page Two
lf you have any questions, or need further clarification, of any of the conditions imposed by
the DRB on January 4, 1995, please contact me immedialely, in wriling, so that we all have a
clear understanding of the information which must be addressed prior to the issuance of a
TCO for the Thain residences remodel.
Sincerely,
$LCr."^'-Q,r/1^
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
xc: John and Carmen Thain
Mark Churchill
0EC 1 g 1ss4
10\ -00\I\$l\, Di\l' DtPl'
Deeerrrtrer. 14.' 1994
Trrwn *f Vail
I nered tt, elarify rny letter nf Jlrne 3tlt, LSEA..
A letter gt"ant ing access for" cnnstr.,rct inn orr l,:t B was
l*Fqr.lil'ed by yc,u and that letter was wr"itterr in l.esponse tc,that t"eqr-tert. Hc'wever, ennstr.r-tct inn accegs' is nc't
specifieally mentionedn anly r-rndepstc,c'd.
Thea aceesri gr.anted in the June $t-)r lg$r+ lettel. wari fof.
const ruct i c'n purp,:ses 6n ly. That access n,:' l r,nqer. ex i Bt g
when a TtrO is gr.anted. That alg,: nreans al l landscapinqn har.d
arrd r;'lft, rnust be back ir' the c,|.ininal c,:,nfi.F ratir'rr at thatt i ftre.
Sincerely,
Nrn,aA"-aua*J
Diana Donovan
$ecret ar.y
Texasi Tc'wnhc,ttge Ht"rec,wneps Assic'eiat i,:,rr
"*a1 ;o \ --"--''-a r.visEd gll/gl
DRB aPPIJICSIION - rOWN Otr \rAIIr, COLORADO
DATE APPLICATION
DATE OF DRB
**********
IEIS EPPIjrCA|!rON WrI.I NOI! BE ACCEPTEDttNtIL AIJJ REQSIRED rNroR!{arroN ts sIrBMrttED**********
PRO..IECT INFOR}IATIoN :'
A. DESCRIPTfON: Changes to plans per FpB lerter. ?EA
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction ($200.00)x Minor ALteration ($20.00)
($0)Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Revlew
MEETING:
T
c.
D.
ADDRESS:
LEGALDESCRIPTION: LoT 8&9 Block
F
r.
G.
Subdlvlsion
I:^f:?f:I!I i:.described.!y, " meers and bounds resalqesqrrptron-, please provide on.a separate sheet aiaattach to this applicatlon.
ZONING: I{lgh Density Multi-Family
191_lf{At ff reql:lred, appllcanr musr provide a currencsfamped survey showing IoL area.
NAI''E OF AFPLICA}TT:
\?irlrs*d$"'":g;
H. NAl,tE OF APPLICANTTS REPRESENTATM: Lynn FrirztenMailins AddrvalI, -co 8l'8$s t o'n' Bo* 57 =. , === , =, ,=, =
*SIGNATURE (S) :Malllng AddiesE
I. NAI{E OF' OWMRS:
J. Condomi4lum Approval if applicable.
K. PFB lgEl Onn^fte9r. as shown above, are to be paid ar.he tlme of submilrar oi-ons-;#ii"iiioil "=r,!t,.r, when
1q1]VifS fol.-1-puirding. permir, please idenrtfy rheaccurate valuation or ini: proposil. The rown or vail11]r aaJy"t !!i ree_accoiaing t,o rhe rabr.e berow, ro. ensure the correct fee is paia. :^-- ,/4 (rrdg
FEE sGHEDULE: rEE PArD: s to -- ' g1\;
t2ltvlq+^ iiaLUATroN FEEt 0-$ 10,000 $20.00l19,oo1 -$ so;ooo $so.ool, 99, ool - $ 1so; ooo $100. oo
1199, oo1 - $ soo; ooo $zoo. oo$5001 001 - gI, 000; 000 $400. OO$ . ovbr $rrooorooo $500.00
* DESTGN REVIE!{BOARD .IPPROVAT EXPTRES}PPRO\IAIJ
STARTED.TIS
* *NO .AtPtrciFJoN wrar,
ONE YF"AR EJ.TER ATNATJ
TSSUED AITD CONSTRUCTION IS
BEPj 199,i
WTTBOUT OWNER'S SIGNATSRE0tt 1
o
FritzlenPierceBriner
Architccarc Ploanfug Intcrbn
December L6,1994
Jim Cunrutte
Planner
Town of Vail
8D6194: thrc walk way to the back enry was deleted.
l2ll3l94:thewalk way to the back entry was included in the plan again due to the DRB meeting
of 1218194.
Sheet Cl02:
8126t94: the property next to Manor Vail was not included in the staging area.
l2tl3l94:the property next to lvlanor Vail was included in the staging plan due to the DRB
meeting of 1218194.
Sheet .{203a:
8D6/94 there is a spandrel in the window configuration.
l2ll3l94: the spandrel in the window configruation has been removed.
Sheet A203b:
8126194: there is a qpandrel in the window configuration. A window is shown at the back stairs.
Thereis a 3'-0" x 3'-6" window at bedroom # 105. There are 9 skylights along the north edge of
the north roof.
12tL3194: the spandrel in the window configruation has been removed. There is no longer a
window at the back stairs. There is a 3'-0" x 4'j6" window at bedroom # 105. There are 8
skyliChts along the north edge ofthe north roof.
Sheet A203c:
8126t94: there is a spandrel in the window configurations at thc living room and master bedroom.
There is a 3'-0" x 3'-0" window above the ftont door. There is an opening with a railing on the
east facade at the hot tub.
)'-o
JinCumtfie
Pagc2
Dccembc 16, 1994
l2ll3l94:the spandrel in the window configurations has been rrmoved. There is a 3'-0" x 6'-6u
window above thc front door. There is no longer an opening on the east facade at the hot tub.
L:9418\DOC\121694.WPD
oI
TOWNOFVA]L REcErprNo.4{oB l5
DEPARTMLNf OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME$T
n^,u F3JTrjJ€;'J Penc e-4.-
""*---lA,-!!e-,9q
CHECKS MADE PAYABLE TO TOWN OF VAIL
ACCOI.INT NO-ITEM NO. TAX COSTETL TOTAL
01 0000 41540 ZONINGANDADDRESS MAPS ss.00
01 0000 42415 UNIFORM BUILD]NG CODE s50.00
0l 0000 42115 UNIFORN,I PLUI\4BING CODE s36.00
01 000012115 UNIFOR]\{ MECHANICAI CODE s32.00
010000.12415 UNIFORM FIRE CODE s36.00
11000042115 NATI ONAL ELECTRICAL CODE s30.00
01000042415 i OfiER CODE BOOKS
01 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS (T4YLARS s7.00
0t 0000 42412 xtRoxcoPIEs s0.25
0l 0000 4241?STUDIES
0r 0000 42.fi2 TOVFEES COM PUTER PROGRAN,I s5.01
0l 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTIONS
01 0000 4t332 PLAN REVIEW RE-CHECK FEE tS4O PER HR.
0l 0000 42132 OFF HOURS ]NSPECTION FEES
01 0000 11.112 CONTRACTORS L]CENSES FEES
0l 0000.fl1t3 SIGN APPLICATION FEE s20.00
OI OOOO 41413 ADD]TIONAL SIGNAGE FEE IS i.OO PER SQ,FT.
0l 0000121J0 iVTC ART PROJECT DONATION
01 OOOO41.331,PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE E'].-
010000 12374 iiNVEsrrcATlo;.{ FEE (BUILDING)
3l 0000451i0 TOV PARKING FUND
-0r
0m0 22077 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPET''\SER FUND
'01 0000 21112 ,T.{XABLE @ 1% (STATE)
+ 0t 0000.11010 TAXABLE @ 1+ (TOWN
OI OOOO 42371 BUILDING INVESTICAT]ON
,OTHER
APPLICATION FEES
01 0m041330 ADDI'IloNALGR}'A "2-.'0"s200.oo
0r 0000 11-?-10 Co\-DITIoNAL USE PER\'ilT s200.00
0t 0000.r13-i0 EXTERIoR ALTERATION JLESS THAN 100SQ.Ff.l s200.00-TiT0d0lim- ,ElfTE-r{s500.00-TTm0TlRilSPEel,\L DEVELO PI\'l B\T DI sTR IeT- t N Ew I s 1.500.00-T'Imilr33O_'SPECIALTI JVELOPMENT DISTR]CT [I\4AJOR AT{ffiiilan'6R-Ni s 1.000.00ffis200.00-TI-M001-r-r-ro.SfsDIVTIoN
01 000041330 ,
/ARIANCE s250.00
0l 0000 41330 l ZONING CODE AN4ENDT,IENTS s250.00
01 0000 41330 l rE _ ZONING s200.00
)THER
OTHER
I r LJ r AL: tlc) --
:OMMENTS:
CASH t 1cx* 1 o.nr.'I&l{e,g 4 REC. ItY:
o
T{fhll-l {fF LJF I l-
Hiscel laneous Cash
1?-19-?4 1?:1S;BS
Rec*iPt + tEtlSB
FlcrBunt X t-:lr'
FF;ITELEI.{ PIERIE
Fttr*un t tende red
+ 613S
BEtt{EFr...PEEFfl IIr gEE
-] ':E' rJE
Iterrr Paid
BIE1EIBB4l3;lBEF-1
Ehange ret'urned 't
Rrount Paid
Tl-l€Hr< votj
Yc'ur ca=-;hier REFTHH
r-r-,.**--e_
J"'---'---_;-
' *CEIPT - rr Tovrn of vail
I
?8. BB
!:1. EEi
iloltn
I
\T?
,l
RECBIVEDFROM
0s8t$
F I!. T COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 3 9
FAX 303-479-2452
December 15, 1994
Department of Contmunity Deve lopment
Ms. Lynn Fdtzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Thain Residence, Lots 8 and 9, Texas Townhomes
Dear Lynn:
This letter is intended to clarify your letter to me dated December 15, 1994 as well as to
document the telephone conversation which we had shortly after I received a faxed copy of
your letter. On December 7, 1994, the Design Review Board (DRB) approved numerous
changes to the Thain residence. Part of their approval required the resubmittal of amended
drawings to the staff. I received your amended drawings on December'l 3, 1994 and while in
the process of inserting your amended plans into the approved set ot drawings, I noticed that
several gg changes were added to the drawings, These changes have never been reviewed
or approved by staff or by the DRB, nor has an application been made lor that purpose. My
discussion this morning with Rick Rosen was to point out the fact that a new DRB application
must be submitted and an application must be provided detailing the latest round of changes
you are proposing. Upon receiving this application, we will consider your most recent
changes for approval. As I mentioned to you during our telephone conversation earlier today,
none ol the changes I am talking about in this letter were originally identified in your
December 5, 1994 letter, nor reflected on the plans presented to the DRB on December 7,
1994.
lf you should have any questions or comments or need further clarification of lhis issue,
please feel free to contact me immediately.
Sincerely,
u(+:l
r culrytutu))u L-{Jrl
Jim Curn-utte
Senior Planner
xc: Rick Rosen
Carmen Thain
!z lcn P i r|.€a Er i har ?64991
Friril,en Pierce Briner
ffi 3$1754el/2. Fas: 3o347HM
:December 15,1994
:Jim Curnutte
:sonior Planner
;Townof Vail Dept. of Community Dev.
:75 S, Frontage Road
,Vait Colorado 81657
're: ThainResidencci Lot 8 and gTexasTownhomes
, Dcar Jim:
.
i Ri.k Rorur, r"qu"sted that I follow up on the win{ow cftanges for ths Thain Residence for staff
i upprovat. Those changcs were ad6resscd in my letter of l2l5l94 that is referenced on the l2l8l94
I fiftg appli*tion , " changes to previously apprived plans, proposed ohangcs arc identifiod in a letter
I tom tynn FriElcn to Jim Cumutte datodL2lSl94''
, I hope this is adequatr, please get baok to me if it istl't
Sincerel
L
Architcct
cc: Riok Rosen
CarmenThain
Fri
v
s41
o
Lt94 l t\Doc\l2t STov.wPD
62
i
I
1
I
'I
I
r
I'
':l,_-t- t-:
Fri? zlGn Picrc. Erin.r 3O4476494L
id Name:
Dos$lpllon:
Address end Phone:
€scf iprlon: tot 4FbtT eb
srreerAddress;
Ll 83 E G-tV
Zone District
" | ''.' @t*Actlon
'ovt /1o'b tbfn< ; vots:-
sdr,)i
, JH
wi,IftLo-
Wafu ( +1",e' a|;:ti; (dy sv a r t
6nii,q,it 4 tYo*'l e':Yfo::"-
|i-t t"J+l,J.i; i(r'r*ur qP^ 4tfi
+
tPlt,:
rJll,
s -l
r':G
DRB Fee Pre'Pald.
se
I
t"ign Review Action tt
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
ArchitecVContact, Address and Phone:
Owner. Address and Phone:
/6s
Legal DescriptioniLolEt6trBbck
-
subdivision
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Zone District /om*
(;
qs 'l t's{-e,
€ /.R
Gu.'s." h,LL,'{ o{
Motion by:
taff Action
Vote:_s-c)
seconded or, -So((rt 4/qroer'.l
b,/q,t Q
r< v'is<o\
c ba+?fv,i',J s&G.
,r
lt I
Bdtt,d'tr<
L0 s P;( /"J2
L,
^L;
^e neiglrfttrq J<, fe-4.(v( -{l ,c crtkcfci7 Starr lS-SuQ
6vfoY.rr brr'luei,-lg q ivfi-es+ Ctt /V*'touq ( +9
Ttra-+€r tc,rJlh'f ii ['+t'/ML<-/ Q'<'A a'1ftvv4 L't
3:00 P.M.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
PROJECT ORIENTATION
SITE VISITS
1.
2.
J.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Drivers:
12:00 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
2.
Landmark Lodge - 610 Lionshead Circle.
Randall/Reeman - 2865 Snowberry Drive.
Stu Brown/Beechwood Sandstone Development Corpoiation - 1330 Sandstone Drive.
Fernandez - 5128 Gore Circle.
Thain - 483 Gore Creek Drive.
Golden Peak House - 278 Hanson Banch Road
Covered Bridge Building - 227 Bridge Streel.
Randy and George
One Track Mind - Sign/awning application.
302 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot I, Block 5-A, Vail Village Sth Filing.
Applicant: Alex ParsonsMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
GR
Covered Bridge Building - Final review of buildingirailing colors.
227 Bridge StreeVLots C, D and a Part of Lot B, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: East West Partners
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
Golden Peak House - Demo/rebuild of structure. MM
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and Part of C, Block 2, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Association/Vail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners,
Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
MM
3.
4.Randall/Reeman - Conceptual review of a new single tamily residence.
2865 Snowberry Drive/Lot Lots 2 and 3, Block 9, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: LouiseRandall/CliveFteeman
MOT]ON:SEGOND:VOTE:
GRg
5.Roundabout - Final review of landscaping and signage.
Four Way Stop in Main Vail.
Applicant: Town of Vail Public Works Department
RS
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
previously approved plans.
483 Gore Creek DriveiLots 8A, 88 and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Applicant: John and Carmen Thain
7. Stu BrowniBeechwood Sandstone Development Corporation' New 12-plex LW/AK
condominiums/town homes.
1330 Sandstone DriveiLot G-4, Lionsridge Filing 4th Filing.
Applicant: The Collaborative Group and Rick Rosen, representing Leslie Lerner/Stu Brown
MOTION:SECOND:VOTE:
JC
LW8.Fernandez - New single family.
5128 Gore Circle/Lot 4, Block 3, Bighorn 5th Addition.
Applicant: Ghislaine de Terioyanne de Fernandez,
SECOND:
represented by Duane Piper
VOTE:MOTION:
RS9.Holiday House - Modification of lront entry.
9 Vail RoadiLot A, B, C, Vail Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Bruce GillieMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabfed to December 21,1994.
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
/*Vr*(
tz(z(ty
,le lryc Vr
d/fQlvrtQ-
\
d-
t t- l*h P i'rc' Er incr 4'? 6494 |
I
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P,O. B4x t7 Vdl Colfrtdo EI6t6 30t47ffi312 Ft: t0i1476.49.1
December 5, 1994
Mr. Jim Curnuttc
Town of Vail Planning Deportmeot
75 S. F'rcncage Road
Vail Colorado 81658
Ro: Thain Residence
Mooting of Novcmber 22,1994
Dcar Jim,
.-,.?!1
il,1
CI
As we discusscd hcro arc thc changes between the June 7, 1994 approved DRB drawings and the
BuildingPermit set application of8/23194. Ourrecordsshow that sheets Cl0l, A00lA,Al02,
y'o}l,A202,A203Cwerercsumittcdw/changcs in duplicatcpcryourroqucston 620/94 and
Cl0l, A,102, A203B andSl0l on6122/94,Soms of the ctangesdiscussedhereareaddressed
in thcse issuances.
r, rbttrc**fl-ants iri thc arcas callcd out as planters. On Cl02 shest it is shown
graphically and on Clol itiscdledoutverbally, the intent is thesame.
2. 'the nd*ryohr bccnfhssFd la accordance with the GRFA reallocation we submitted
8/25194,
3. Ttilsiitsr*Gun ttr sol*dofibdr barement door has been removed at tre owne/s request,
This walkway onlyservedUnits..- ;.r(lt't Ca'(( ,/ :./. ,' i*s.( ,noy he Oft
4. A skylight has been removed fromthe north side of the roof and the south skylight has become
smallerandmovcd 1',
5. In rcgards to opcess fiom tho parking lot to the front door walkway, it is the opinion of the
Thain's at tomey thal Colorarlo law gwuantecs acccss and no speoial approval is roquirod. Pleasc
speak to Mike Smith or Rick Rosen in regards to this issue.
.l^\l
v-l fft-'L'
tt'\
,l "l r \irei-1 r\'(
\"f
4-c.
cl02
ritzlcn P i crs. Brinrr
Pc,e2
Decembcr5, 1994
li
i >. i l. The stairstnrfiuehasbeenchangedfrom slab ong€de to woodframebecauseof structural
i / I conditionslhat becameapparcntuponexcavation. Thereis now aspace underthestairthatthe
i , I ' owner would like to use as storqge. We do not intend to add additional GRFA by litpiting thei.ri ' height ofthis spacc to 5'.
,"1: i 2. Thc laundry has bcen moved from tho comnon arca mechanical into the lower unit.
A102
I
i t E) l. Viele Constnrction has confirmed that
-
i
i: rA10l
194.
cafculations of 8D5/94we cona;t.=_a( rck
to fourdation desigl.
t. A grate has been added to the ftontdoor enty.
2. l'he tub has been relocated pgrlhe rcvised GRFA oalculations submittrd 8n5D4,
3- Q.avov4d Ulpdocp weL
Al04
A203r
3a{iu64eot
."t/-t - r., ,//'
, )-ee& lt( 1.,'|ft?"';gt
. The door to the oulsidp deck has been changed per tho revised GRFA calculations submjtted
2. 'Ihe wall thickness on the north wall has be,en reduced hom 10" to 6', but the rcvisdd GR!'A
4202
l. As subrnitted by KRM structrral consultants 6122194 per yorx roqu€st, the footings aro
contilevored and not spread. As you may be aware, structural drawings alu'ays supersede the
,/tlru to*t wcrc not prcviously intcndcd pcr your earlior dircction.' It is my
most recent meeting with Tom Moorebead that the roof overhangs fall into the
as tho brick sill cxtcnsions and is now allowcd. Plcasc call Rick Roscn for
ritzlcn PlGr€. Eriner Eo56'4e61
Pago 3
Dooombor 3, 1994
t'4"
'r/r/lt/a-/,/ -1 ,,/
Di t. Per our conversation ofNovemb/ a;,',$fiticdii l_.;"''#, z. Brickwork was removed between ti-e windo$rs and wood was substinrted. We did thisv\ ' thc nciphbor's reouest to increase the amount of wood./\ i thc ncighbo/s request to increase the amount of wood.
,/,/ - j/./l'
@riard.rum ay be corhel ed.
based on
Ak 3. Thebaseofthestairtonerisbrick andthe spandrelsbetweenttrswindowsarewood. Thiswas
" l'\ i a clarificarion rather than a change since it was not clear on the originat 6[/94 drawings.',|
' i I ---^ )r^-t-^t.L^a.L^ -.,:-,r^-.-
1. Exterior door at third level has been relocated per the CRFA changes zubmitted 8/25/94.
propcrty or public right ofway.
A203c
f . Irront door now has a window in it.
tO t{Z Window at third floor now hos additional mulliols.
btst a',.',,c.ct aj* fr-qr ot+'k ef tp'(I
the more recently lssued plan to the building
shccts for your rcvicw,
-:.
i
>'.
itzlcr'l Pi.rce Erlner Eg 6494L
Pogc 4
Decembcr 5, 1994
The town's apptication rquirements request '@" forDesighRevicw
application. As the construction documents develop it is inevitable that there will be minor
ctrangcs antl clarifrcations based on input from coffEctors, the governing jrrrisdiction' e:risting
soils and site conditions and input ftom the owner.
There have been several minorchanges but based on my review ofthe DRB chapterofthe codo
it is my opinion that the entircty of llre changes addrcssal in this letter do not rtquire a.dditional
DRB approval. Rich Rosen has also reviewed the non-conforrring section of the code .and ie of
the opinion that we are in confonnatroe with it as well . It has beet cxtrcrnely time consriming for
the town slaff, ogrsolvos and the applicant to have bad numerous zoning interpretations reversed.
It would be Very mwfi apprcciated if you could researoh the status of the cuffent changes as
Fro 347o
thoroughly as possible before rendering,a decision.
4'|il
r Thonk you for your consideration.
cc: Rick Rosen
CarmenThain
L :\94 1 8\DOC\ I 202TOV.1VPD
/--_
J:twt..d. 7 /t4l9A
DESIGN REVIEW
r.
A.
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:**********
INCOAPTJETE APPLICATIONS TTAY NOT BE SCHEDWED FOR RSITIEW.**********
PRO.'ECT INFORMATION:
DESCRIPTION:
6Z TaV DrP-eaTto
TYPE OF REVIEW:
NAME OF APPLICA}flI:Mailing Address:
)61<(2
H.
NAME OF
NAME OF OWNER(S):
APPLICANT'S REPRES ATIVE:Mailing Address:
OWNER(S) SIGNATVRN'|
Mailing Address:
Lrnnu Fn,r=r-n\
APPIrrcATroNs wrLL Nor BE PRocEssED wrrilott! owNER' s srGNerun.E
I. Condominium Approval_ if applicable.
J. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are t,o be paid at. theLime of submiE.tal of the DRB application. Lat.er, whenapplying for a building penniL, please identify the accuraLevaluaLion of the proposal. The Town of VaiI will_ adjust Ehefee according to the t,able below, to ensure the correct feeis paid.\"
(\\
.En0ffe 7,lW
BOARD APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAII,, COIJORADO
legal
and attacb
D.
New Construction (9200.00) * Minor Alterat,ion ($20.00)Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
LEGAL DESCRIPT
Subdivision
ADDRESS, 433 6-rz. Ce-r=f D'^,,rtu
Blq Block
E.
ff property is described bydescription, please providd a meets and bounds
on a separaEe sheeEt.o this application.
ZONING:
FEE SCHEDULE:
VAIJUATION$ 0 $ L0,000$ 10, 001 - $ s0, 000
$ 50, 001 $ 150, 000
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ Over 91, 000, 000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPIRES
APPROVAIJ T'NI,ESS A BUIIJDING PERI'IIT IsIS STARTED.
FEE
+ zu. uu
$ s0.00
$100. 00
$200. 00
$400 .00
$s00.00
ONB YEAR AFTER FTNAL
ISSUED EI{D CONSTRUCTION
Fritzlen Pierce Briner 0Ec
P.O. Box 57 Vtil Colamdo 81658 30347G6342 Far:
December 5,1994
IvIr. Jim Curnutte
Town of Vail Planning Department
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail Colorado 81658
Re: Thain Residence
Meeting of November 22,1994
Dear Jim.
As we discussed here are the changes between the June 7, 1994 approved DRB drawings and the
BuildingPermit set application of 8125/94. Ourrecordsshow that sheets Cl0l, A00lA,Al02,
A201, A202, A203C were resumitted w/ changes in duplicate per your request on 6/20/94 arfl
ClOl, 4102, A203B and Sl0l on6/22/94. Some of the changes discussed here are addressed
in these issuances.
c101
l. It is intended to have plants in the areas called out as planters. On Cl02 sheet it is shown
graphically and on Cl0l it is called out verbally, the intent is the same.
2. The roof shape has been changed in accordance with the GRFA reallocation we submitted
8/25t94.
3. The sidewalk from the front door to the basement door has been removed at the owner's request.
This walkway only served Unit 8.
a. A skylight has been removed from the north side of the roof and the south skylight has become
smaller and moved l'.
5. In regards to access from the parking lot to the front door walkway, it is the opinion of the
Thain s at torney that Colorado law guarantees access and no special approval is required. Please
speak to Mike Smith or Rick Rosen in regards to this issue.
ct02
, .t
Page2
December 5, 1994
l. Viele Construction has confimred that the Manor Vail propeny has been approved for
construction staging.
A101
l. The stair structue has been changed from slab on grade to wood frame because of structural
conditions that becarne apparent upon excavation. There is now a space under the stair that the
owner would like to use as storage. We do not intend to add additional GRFA by limiting the
height of ttris space to 5'.
2. The laundry has been moved from the coulmon area mechanical into the lower unit.
A102
1 A grate has been added to the front door entry.
2. The tub has been relocated per the revised GRFA calculations submitted 8/25194.
A104
l. The door to the outside deck has been changed per the revised GRFA calculations submitted
8/25t94.
2. The wall thickness on the north wall has been reduced from 10" to 6'. but the revised GRFA
calculations of 8/25/94 ate correct.
4202
l. As submitted by KRM structural consultants 6122194 per your request, the footings are
cantilevered and not spread. As you may be aware, structural drawings always supersede the
architectural in regards to foundation design.
2. Roof overhangs at the tower were not previously intended per your earlier direction. It is my
impression from our most recent meeting with Tom Moorehead that the roof overhangs fall into the
same category as the brick sill extensions and is now allowed. Please call Rick Rosen for
clarification.
A203a
Page 3
December 5, 1994
l. Per our conversation of November 16. all brickwork mav be corbeled.
2. Brickwork was removed between the windows and wood was substituted. We did this based on
the neighbor's request to increase the amount of wood.
3. The base of the stair tower is brick and the spandrels between the windows are wood. This was
a clarification rather than a change since it was not clear on the original 6/7/94 dratings.
4. After discussing the window sizing with Susan more at length we determined that the windows
became 8" shorter based on our conversations with the window fabricator in resaxds to mullion
spacing.
A203b
1. Exterior door at third level has been relocated per the GRFA changes submitted 8125/94.
2. Window at the third floor has been deleted per the GRIIA changes submitted 8125/94.
3. Upper skylight is smaller.
4. Door at,firstlevelhasbeenchangedto a window. Thiswindowisnotvisiblefromanyadjacent
property or public right of way.
{203c
l. Front door now has a window in it.
2. Window at third floor now has additional mullions.
s1
l. The footing design has been superseded by the more recently issued plan to the building
departnent by KRM consultants of 6/22/94.
Electical Drawings
l. Exterior lighting is proposed. We will submit cut sheets for your review.
Page 4
December 5, 1994
The town's application requirements request "preliminary architectual plans" for Desigr Review
application. As the constuction documents develop it is inevitable that there will be minor
changes and clarifications based on input from conhactors, the governing jurisdiction, existing
soils and site conditions and input from the owner.
There have been several minorchanges butbased on my review ofthe DRB chapter ofthe code
it is my opinion that the entirety of the changes addressed in this letter do not require additional
DRB approval. Rick Rosen has also reviewed the non-conforming section of the code and is of
the opinion that we are in conformance with it as well . It has been extremely time consuming for
the town staff, ourselves and the applicant to have had numerous zantng interpretations reversed.
It would be very much appreciated if you could research the status of the crurent changes as
thoroughly as possible before rendering a decision.
Thank you for your consideration.
cc: Rick Rosen
Carmen Thain
L:\941 8\DOC\1202TOV.WPD
trf- 7-94 66P 1$:53
JUL-le-'94 t3;52 lDi
o
3a36?32g,62
i, ur'
EAAU PBz
r,p,$i( fi#|l{'.ti$t#,ii$flr' $ $,'r,,,:,it,.
l l,'.,
ur..f,t ' '. | ,At|4aI t<.
il,vd,
,-0t0 P.t,, erl|tlE ttrrtFrrxtt aot8 cawtv aLEH(l
PN'OFDigl0lllA)
tlltrttE
l. tlillr&r.
l!.bt ot_. 1t9tEhbti
il
\9
$
lrlr orrttsF l| a |[tlt ^grrl|lt: rttec-trtton rr ihlctlDril tn SrcBloo
1 1-1 1, ! -! 0l colctlco rrfdr-iC' i6iitd; - - i; qnnt hf th l-r- tr r't'ht
-ovra[ir"i6'oi r r-ir-rnti u,. lsbr;Ji $i:ill":l htT i._1.1 r.#.tfi ]ff f i[iil#!rtfii'Aj!_ff0.!a-""incrrfl wr.rlr.oodir-r-rlk-'c;,-'irctrsara-ri.i+sttat -lla llil .ccl3sr{o lrvlrrl ltrtEB t' :..r
ii;riirtiiffiffi'**Tt**Ht'i";.ig'*.l*:r#
lirt'
wiIGFr-t-BiirFtDltttnllvtdurl. |ho lrdrcrlbd llt tbl..
r €elcrldo no.nPrctl!!ilr Hra r.q.lD3 |nqril oonlrlltllr h.r.qf
iiirrrritns tt.tt, oll thr northlllYrl.oot cli tba artt lldr ui x.dr-i.
nsrr ccntl!rucsf tc tat ^1. YIU Ylv.lt gltlr|. atl ttltno tr r ltlal|fer..h Drtvr b, tt.00t- on tba ltltOrrits -e-*vr lf-ff'oOi-on tlrl tlr! rti-r,rnd hrdrrniil'dd-r;!ned'i. vrrt'vifieiirtr inrnf on thr D
fl |Jl!Sq[s'r-F'lr*rii'h,lT.'T'f ili:*ffi', i
r'i'i.lils:otif; tft$iEiEl:iffi ri'1i".'IoryLl$.!-t!lu.sl
xrneltlrol rl r|t6rEl '
It,
q{ytr.
*'nurrP.SNt'+a'*-sqbg, /tz,@F,u
ot9 'i adtt0,00' 0,00,,.
,5
-----------^-IlL;[p;'9{ llr54 ID!
e n, l[_t\ ,r -, -,utL.,- - |-uq HEU l3'cq o
ISPP DENUER 2 TEL NO!
o
3rc6234862
P, ()1
s?86 P03
'rlitrili*l # 4\{dtfl*4..,1f r" .r,li$, ' ""r
"r,i,i1'!1t'
Falott.'t..roaflt E-at' F.tt) otlit/8J tttrt
a. @. t!|ttl llLaarrtlB ana th. aarttlstlona.rr! lcy.lrDi-aailEmJF--lr rhrU b. !ov.n.||tr Scuehlno ad ooa--lnr t'b l.na rra tl|nBlm rlth tDr l.i.l rill rhrll Daaor. ttrd l| .rt..t!rnt rpprtrHn! to Fot lr vrll Vtllrlr atlr ttllry ral rbrll lr r
Wrd.lt utpn 3bf .uDttrt l|nt.
f.f. Ufffe-lfl|fir lhlr t raralt!. etrrr t.{.rtlIrg to Etutoe ororDnl.rr -rnll tl|a !N blndlnt uDoa .nC lnugr tb thr DfDrSlt ot tlFltDr Dtndlng upor! .trd lnugr tirtal r|Draaaltllltr.r!. ruLal.cr t$.trliir.
ii
rrrr[ctlrr hal$. lr!.1.nd orn.rr of uirdlyllrrtrt)|cBlft halr|r lrlal r|Draaantiltyt!, ruraal.nEr. orrtrtxa, ].rllttrtand orA.rr o! rudlvlful litrFrrta ln tha tt natrl CEden lloanEa ct|ldr.t Vlll r
a. _ lllEllllll. _fta D.rtlr hlr rnoutrd thlr Srrurnt rr of tbr dryrid Itar ltrr't rlEwr -GlBt n,
|iill{tl Yllt €oiDoltrttt l Altccllltotl
tYt
!r lE Ct cilAr&
ooum er !t!tf ._
aa.
tb. tot.gglng lnlgFlrr_,bt r.._lelngyl.dgr! b.Cohr r. trrh UE[- dry elgffi;*i!i'.n 'Ji";ra
|ltnrrr W htnl r;l oltlcful rrrl.
'U
-_*_9Ll0lt et ___
0rlrr ct at.oouw oP
*.'fiF?P:lttrF: ffig,f:T$?tfid Drf*r r' uitr 4Q cr1 et
llltrr|| ry h||d ml sltlelet |.rl.
,tt sol.rlcn blrilr ..-,+||p$rr tlr lrta.,. .,. _, _
I
o'
TOWN OFVAIL
DEPARTMI]Nf OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CHECXS MADE PAYABLE TO TOWN OF VAtr-
42412
RS LICI 0000 4111
l 0000 11113
OI OOOO l21JO VTC ART PROJECT DONATiON
1OOOO413-3I PRE PAID DESI
413.30 SPEC]AL DEVELOP]\4ENT D
-il^rcrrn'.-[t
cASHr-1.*'1 3,548 o^,*lSft 3 4
I
Tchfhl GF LtFl I l-
Hiscel lanesus Cash
1l-E1B-?+1 B: 5d: Bf,
H*c*ipt. * lE1339
Ftccrunt# r:H+3543
LTf"II.I FEITILE}'hTJFJS FEE
Hrrd'un t t.endered .1 ?8. BF
Irem paid frtotJnt psid
ffl SHErS4l:3188fl lt3. frB
[:h.:nge re l.Lr rnrd :] tll . Ell:1
THFII{r< vgl-J
iruru r c*Ehier FIERTHFi
THE LAW OFFICES OF
DENVIR
| | 20
LINCOLN STREET
SlJtTE I IOO
DENVEFI COLORAOO
4o203
TEL 303 432 1900
FAX 303 463 04 | 2
PO BOX zl | 37
VAIL COLORADO
at65a
TEL 303 4'' | 1940
P.C.
*
'Ri.,rrrru Z z tl'ld,,
November 18. 1994
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: t ot 8. Texas Townhomes. Town of Vail
Owner: John and Carmen Thain ("Thain")
Dear Jim:
As confirmation of our telephone conference of Wednesday, November 16, 1994 with
Tom Moorhead and Lynn Fritzlen, the following is provided:
1. The Town of Vail has agreed that Thains have the right to include brick
window sills and ornamental brickwork around tlre windows provided all brick
protrusions are limited to the window areas. The Town did not agree to any brick
protrusions that appear on other areas of the improvements, including the corners of the
building or any area adjacent to the ground. The intention is to avoid the appearance of
extending the perimeter walls similar to projects such as the Sonnenalp.
2. The Town will assist the Thains in providing a reasonable drainage
easement for subsurface foundation drainage ftom the improvements. Either myself or
Lynn Fritzlen will notify the Town of the general location of the drainage line, and my
office will prepare a drainage easement for the acceptance by the Town and subsequent
recording.
3. The License Agreement by and benveen the Town of Vail and the owners
of Unit 7A and Unit 78 is not a requirement of the Design Review Board and will not be
a requirement for issuance of the temporary certificate of occupancy and ultimately the
issuance of the final certificate.
4. The revised construction drawings as provided to the Town by Lynn
Fritzlen will be reviewed by yourself and Lynn to determine what changes, additions,
and/or deletions will require DRB approval.
5. The staircase issue will continue to be worked on by the Town, thru Tom
Moorhead attempting to communicate with lay Peterson, and by myself. A copy of the
letter sent to lay Peterson is enclosed. In the event this issue can not be resolved prior to
a request for issuance of a TCO, the Town will consider a r€quest for the issuance of the
oF coUNsEL: ELROD, KATZ, PREEO, LooK' MOISON & SILvERMAN' P g'
Mr. Jim Curnutte
November 18, 199.
Page Ttvo
TCO with collateralization provided by the Thains. A reasonable time period will be
grant€d in which the issue can be negotiated. As a separate note, the Town agtees that
the removal of the staircase during construction was not a violation of DRB approval.
The approval seemingly indicated a requirement to have a stairque in place upon
completion of the project.
6. The Town will work with my offrce, Lynn Fritzlen, and Viele
Construction, and hopefully avoid the "letter campaign" that took place in the past. No
blame has been placed with any party. It has been a$eed upon by all sides that open
communication would better assist this project.
I trust the above correctly reflects our teleconference. I am sending copies to Tom
Moorhead and Lynn Fritzlen. Hopefully, if I have misstated any part of our agreement,
it can be corrected immediately.
After your review ofthe enclosed, please call with any questions.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. ROSEN. P.C.
-T4I I'V t f lLwuv\_
Richard P. Rosen
Tom Moorhed
Lyn Frialzn
John and Cannen Thain
o
':.
THE !AW OFFIqES OF .1
otNYll
| | 20
LINCOLN 9TFI EET
surTE I loo
DENVER COLORAOO
80eo3
TEL 303 832 1900
FAX 903 463 0a | 2
PO BOX 4137
VAIL qOLORADO
a I o58
r€L 303 471 1940
RTCHARO P. ROSEtI , P. C.
November 18, 1994
Jay Peterson, Esq.
108 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Diana DonovaniJohn and Carmen Thain
Dear Jay:
An attempt to resolve the continued dispute over the staircase issue between our clienB, I
have discussed the problem with the Town of Vail (Tom Moorhead and Jim Curnu6e)
and my clients. It is the position of the Town of Vail that the existing staircase does not
meet current building code requirements. Therefore, in its present condition, it can not
be reinstalled. Notwithstanding, minor modifications to the staircase most probably will
meet those requirements and allow for reinstallation.
Nevertheless, John and Carmen Thain do not wish to have the stailcase reinstalled in the
sarne location prior to construction. It is the position of the Thains that the staircase only
serves the owners of Units 7A and 78, and co[tinued permission to use the staircase as it
existed on the Thains property is no longer satisfactory. As such, I would like to suggest
that the staircase, once modified to meet code, be placed back onto the deck area of
Units 7A and 78 in a location satisfactory to those owners. It has been suggested that
the western area of the building would be an appropriate location. This would serve to
eliminate the concern of Diana in the potential of blocking the view to the creek area.
I would hope that this can be resolved quickly and amicably. Please discuss the same
with your clients. I look forward to a prompt response.
Please be advised that I will be out of the country from November 22 - 29. I will be
back in my office on Wednesday, November 30th.
Thanl$ for your assistance.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. ROSEN. P.C.
Jim Curnutte
Tom Moorhead
OF COUNSEL €LROO KAIZ. PFEEO' LOOK Ml]ISON S S 'VERMAN P C
.Lt.r.LLAK--
Richard P. Rosen
/hs
!
enPierceBrir;
Offlce Box 57
all, Colorado 81658
Comparison between Thain plans dated. 8t25 19 4, 8D6l 9 4, 617 I 9 4, & 6n0 /9 4.
ENsB4
l. Sheet A104 shows thc north wall of the master bedroom moved north by 3'-0'. The door to the
' hot tub area has been moved to the north wall. This arqiS clouded by Lynn and submitted to the
tbwn for approval. /'
2. Sheet Al03 shows an addition and deletion of the sarne).mount of GPSA from unit A and B.
Addition of lSsq.ff. to Unit B, deletion of 15 sq. ft. from Ufut A. This is also submitted to the
town forapproval. t
I
8f26194: submitted to the T.O.V- 6nD4A 6DAl94: submitted to T.O.V.
I
I
1. Sheet Al04 l. sheit Al02
Master bedroom shows the north wall Master bedroom north wall is south 3'-0"
moved 3'-0u to the north and the door to the from the 8126/94location. The door to hot
hot tub area on the north wall. Sasre as 8nSD4. tub is off the batbroom.
2. Sheet A20l rcflects the above coditions. 2. Sheet A20l reflects the above conditions.
3. Sheet A203b: north elevation 3, SheetA2O3b: nolth elevation
'The roofon this elevationreflects the changes The roofonthis elevationreflects the above
made to the plan submitted on 8125194. condition.
4. Sheet A203c: east elcvation 4. Sheet 4203"' ".rt d.rrutioo
Shows a half glass and half wood ftont door. Shows a solid fi'ont door with recessed
Shows french casement windows in the panels.
mastcr bedroom. Shows the master bedroom window as
having one large pane of glass
surrounded by a ring ofdivided lights.
5. SheetA203b: section/elevationnortb. 5. SheetA203b: section/elcvationnorth
.Shows a window in northeast bedroom. $hows a double door in the northeast bedroom.
Shows overframing for the deck Does not show overframing for the deck'
5. Sheet Al0l: basement plan 6. A10l: basement plan
Shows storage under north stairs. No storage under the north stairs.
Shows no cornmon tauudry. Shows a common laundry.
.7. Sheet At02: 2nd level plan 7. Sheet Al0lb: 2nd level plan
Shows thc additional GRFA to unit B and the Shows no GRFA changes .
)
{aa
o
d-t*- =
/ €nret<-ut ,,r5ouu/ 4 zla
2.
P',re.L /'4/% '4 *,-I'/-t pr$
/ t. a(.ota
4r'4/ ar /#a, =3- ftrrLcl"p = .) -2)' u*roW= /hA,y4r;4
7"r"tt )dF zl hJ % - h. )tu)?t<:
Y'44
/2"'f*ffi
Gfr"
o1 U*- ,^- /ra* Z* L. y'aa
M ,(* e'*i4h,"^ P";^ZVL=
7
F [!- t c0PY
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
November 2,1994
Deparnnent of Community Development
Mr. Mark Churchill, Project Manager
J.L. Viele Construction
1000 South Frontage Road West, Suite 202
Vail, GO 81657
RE: 483 Gore Creek Drive. Units 8A and 88. Texas Townhomes
Dear Mr. Churchill:
I felt the need to respond to your letter to me dated October 31, 1994 regarding the above-
referenced propefi. To say the least, I was quite surprised at the tone of your letter and
some of the accusations you make in it. Your letter states that you "never have nor do you
intend to have construction equipment staged on Town of Vail owned property". Yesterday I
visited the property again with Mike Mollica, Acting Director of Community Development, and
we both confirmed that you do have construction equipment staged on Town of Vail owned
property. Your on-site supervisor aoreed that you are using public property as a lay-down
area. Contrary to the statements in your letter, the Town of Vail is not harassing you with
regard to this matter, ws have simply requested that you remove construction equipment from
publicly owned property, which you do not have permission to stage upon. Fortunately, I
received a verbal commitment from your on-site supervisor to immediately remove all
construclion materials lrom public property, so this matter should be resolved.
The purpose of the letter to Lynn Frifzlen dated October 27, 1994 was nol to harass the
architect, yourselves or the Thains as stated in your letter. lt was simply to inform the
architect that the numerous changes that they were proposing to make to the approved
construction drawings must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board (DRB)
before actual implementation of those changes. I am assuming that you are working closely
with the architect to receive the necessary approvals before actually implementing any of the
proposed changes at the Thain residences. lf you have not done so, lwould suggest that you
obtain those approvals prior to construction of the changes.
i'\
Mr. Churchill
November 2, 1994
Page Two
I hope the above information clarifies some of the misconceptions that you have apparently
had with regard to the above-referenced construction project. I would appreciate it if in the
future you would contact me directly with regard to any questions you might have regarding
my correspondence with the architect or other individuals so that we could avoid such
confusion in lhe future.
''ffi'Lh
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
xc: File
Mike Mollica
Tom Moorhead
Hick Rosen
Carmen Thain
Lynn Frilzlen
Texas Townhomes Association
mT-31-94 l{0N 12:5,1 P, 02
ar.
l.Lvaclc Coostrustion, lnc.
1000 $. Fronrgc Rnod Wcs. Suir 202
V.il, Ccrlo & 81657
Te1c303. 476, 3082
Frx 90$,.f76. 342-1
October 31, 1994
Jim Curnutte
Deporfincnt of Community Dwelopment
75 Sor:lh Frontagc Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
RE: 483 Gore Creck Drive; Unils tA and 8B
Staging
Mr. Crunuth,
We have receivcd a copy of your lctler to Lynn Fritzlcn dated October 27, 1994.
Conbary to thc allcgatirxrrs containcd in your lcttcr, wc are stagcd on thc Thainrs property
and have the owner's penuission and logal right to have our comtrustiotr fcnce located
where lt is presently ( refer to "Landscaping/Open Space Easement" Book 610, page
269). S/c havc neverhad. nordo we intend to hsve "constntction e4uipment" slngnd on
Town of Vail ownql p$perly. Both yoruself and other Tj2gg employd individuals have
physicully vicwctl unl rsvicwed oru jubsitc widr our ficlrl supcrintundcnt and huve
verifrsd our lay-down atea. Furthermore, as we have been told by T.O,V, persoilrcl, it is
apparcut that thcrc cxist several dcck struotures on Tsxas Townhomcs units wtrich have
bcco conetnrclcd within T.O.V. owncd propc,rty- We find it particularly interesting that
thc irdividual property ownors have not been hurrused, as wo aJE, with this mattpr.
We have alsobeen rccently accuscd of (1) "trashing ouf' the intorior stair towcr
of units 7A and 78, (2) damaging lhe parking lot paving and,.(3) nrining lcxns
Towohomee Aesocietion Landscaping beyond repair. None of lhe$e accusations have nny
truth and w€ wondor if the cnble televisiun company that rcccntly ran a ncw sewice sRble
ro thc pedcstal (locarcd on Tbain's property - not direct€d by rs or Thains) wuc bEIa$Sl
with thsir con$truction m6thods. (l) They torc up thc parking lot paving, (2) tlrey storgd
two enomous spools of cable and their ranohing machinc on Thain's pffkirg spaces for
livo daye, inchding a *'soksrd. widr no authorizetion end (3) ttenohcd thsir coble line
directly tluough root systcnrs of Texas fownhomcs Association owned rnaturc Aspcn
uecs,
It is most utrforfiuate that a private oilizen with a ohip on their shoulder,
(purptrrtcdly, vin mntempt for finoroially successfirl individutls), aun pcrsondly dictarc
how governmcntal proccsscs should be run. If that irrformation wcrc tro become
commouly known tfuoug,hout the valley, on€ would tNnk thst the govenrmontal systcm
and omployccs would bc very snrbanassed.
We have b€6n oonduoting busincsg in fis volloy for ncorly 20 yca,rs. Wc havc
had prinoipal rncmbcrs of our company on some past towr governmerrt boards. \[Ic have
maintarned a very noteworthy and rcputable reprrtation an{ frankly, do not appraciate the
0CT-31-94 l'10il 12:54 P, 03aI..\
oulrighl, lrartrsulreut bcing dirwtsd ut ttrc cruhitesl uurut{vcs dnd our client. Tt ls ln
cwryono's best intcrcst for us to gct on rvlth the project without the weeldy aggravations
suppllcd by an lratc local. It's the Archi(ect's, Conhactor's and Town's job to cnforce
locnl crx{e and/nr rnning crrmpliance issncr - no onn elges.
We would be murc thiur happy to mect you at theJobslte for another look at our
lay-doqn arca. At your esdiest cotrvenienrrc, of cnrure. llank you in advancs for you
p(ofessional assistanoc in this mattcr.
Bcst Rcgards,
J,L. Visle Constructioq Inc.
cc: Tim Roscu
Carmen'lhain
Lynn Friulen
Toxas Tovmhomes Assosiation
FI!- E COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
October 27.1954
Depamnent of Community Deve lopment
Ms. Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner Architects
P.O. Box 57
Vail. CO 81658
RE: Proposed changes to construction drawings for the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 88, and
9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing
Dear Lynn:
Quite some time ago, your otfice, or the general contractor for the above-referenced remodel,
submitted two sets of revised construction drawings tor proposed changes at the Thain
residences, Lots 8A, 88, and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing. lt appeared that
the purpose of the proposed changes was to add additional GRFA in a few areas of the
building. However, upon closer scrutiny of the drawings, it appears that a significant number
of changes are proposed for the Thain residences, boh intemal and extemal. Some of these
changes appsar to show violations of the nonconforming section of the Code, other changes
may be revioved once a Design Review Board (DRB) application is received.
Ralher than have staft try and determine all of the changes on your revised construction
drawings, I am retuming those drawings to you so that you may identify exactly what changes
to the approved construction drawings you are requesting approval of. When you have
prepared that information, please submit it along with a DRB application so that lurther revieut
of your proposed changes may proceed.
Additionally, as ldentified in a letter to you dated September 2,1994, we have become aware
that the general contractor is using Town of Vail owned land directly behind the Thain
residence for construction staging. I pointed out to you that the staging ol equipment on Town
land is not acceptable and was not shown on your approved staging plan and requested that
you remove all construction equipment and or other elements of the job from public property.
We have sincs become aware that you are using the Manor Vail prop€rty, and possibly the
Texas Townhomes Association property, for construction staging as well. lf it is your intention
to use other properties lhan cunently shown on your construction staging plan, then you
should amend your staging plan and submit it along with your other proposed changes, for
DRB rwiew. lf it is your intention to stage only in the areas originally approved by the Town,
then we ask that you remove the construction equipment from the above-mentioned properties
immediately. This must be completed by 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, November 2, 1994 or he
Town will have choice but to issue a stop work order on the project.
tvls. Fritzlen
October 27.1994
Page Two
lf you should have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please feel free to contact
me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
4AJ,n &rLflrnq-,I
Jim cumute u?L LC'-l
Senior Planner '
xc: File
FII-E COPY
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorodo 81657
303-479-2j,38 / 479-21 39
FAX 303-479-2452
Deparnnent of Conmuniry Developnent
October2s, 1994 ;
Mrs. Diana Donovan
1014 Homestake Circle
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Response to letter regarding the Thain and cornice Buitding redevelopments
Dear Diana:
As lhe planner who handled both of the redevelopment projects reterred to in your letter dated
Oclober 13, 1994 to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), Design Review
Board (DRB), slaff, and Town Council, I thought I would drop you a note in response to some
ol the comments made in your letter.
As you know, the Thain remodel was reviewed by lhe DRB on May 4, May 1g, and June 1,
1994. The June 'lst DRB approval contained six conditions. For your information, I have
enclosed a copy of a letter that was written to Lynn FriElen, the Thains' architect, which
delails the DRB conditions of approval. As you can see, Condition 5 of the DRB approval
states that "any trees or shrubs on or adjacent to the property that die as a result of the
construction of the Thain residences, must be replaced with like species and size'.
Once a construction permit is issued for a project, the planning staff relies on lhe building
inspectors to ensure that the building is being constructed per the approved conslruclion
drawings. This, of course, includes the conslruction staging plan and any other elemenls of
lhe approved building permit set of plans.
In a fetter sent to Ms. Fritzlen on september 2,1994, staff did point out that it had come to
our attention that the conlractor was using Town of Vail owned property directly behind the
Thain residence for conslruction staging. In the September 2, 1994 lefier we informed the
applicant that the staging of equipment on Town land is not acceptable and was not shown on
the approved plans and requested that they desist from using public property for the
construction of the Thain residences. I will relay your current concern, regarding compliance
with lhe approved staging plan, to Gary Murrain, Chief Building Olficial, and request that an
inspection be done on the property to assure that Town of Vail land or any other land not
shown on the approved construction staging plan is not being used for construclion staging
purposes.
Wth regard to your comment concerning the applicant's two "250 additions", you are correct
in that Units 8A and 88 have increased in size by 500 square feet. However, the applicant
was able to show that each 250 was directly attributable io each of the previously existing
dwelling units. Also keep in mind that because this building was a legal nonconforming
building, the additional 500 square feet cannot, and will nol, result in any change to the mass
and bulk of the previously exisling sheil ol the buitding.
_q
Mrs. Donovan
October25, 1994
Page Two
As you know, the Cornice Building Special Development District (SDD) received extensive
review by the PEC and Town Council before ultimately receiving DRB approval. At this time,
staff has no reason to believe that the Cornice Building is not being constructed according to
the approved plans.
I hope the above information clarifies some of the issues which you raised regarding the two
projects. I will discuss your letter with Gary Murrain and request that lhe building inspectors
keep close tabs on the construction of these two projects to ensure that the approved building
permit construction drawings, and all conditions of approval, are being followed.
ll you should have any additional questions or comments regarding these projects in the
future, please feel free to call me directly at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
[**
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
xc: Mike Mollica
Planning and Environmental Commission
Design Review Board
Town Council
Gary Murrain/Building Inspectors
o
rIL E COPY
TOTN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 3 9
FAX 303-479-2452
June 3, 1994
Departnent of Connutniry Developntent
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Design Feview Board (DRB) conditions of approval for the proposed remodel of lhe
Thain residence, Lots 8A, 8B and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Dear Lynn:
This letler is.intended to documenl the conditions attached to the DRB approval of the
proposed rhain residence remodel which received DRB approval on June 1, 1994. The
remodel ot lhe Thain unils were approved by a 4-0 vote oi ine ORs. The DRB attached the
following conditions to their approval:
1. The exterior bricks proposed for the new residences shall be of the color and
style presented at the DRB meeting. A pholo of the approved brick is kept in
the Community Development Department file and is daled June 1 , 1994. The
DRB condiiion includes lhe color, siz6 and style of the brick and color of the
mortar.
2. All metal railings on the property including the gate at th8 entrance to Unit A wilt
not have the decorative features as shown on the plan presented to the DRB.
All pickels shall be square or rectangle metal rails.
3. The west side of the rear deck must be linished with a solid redwood skirting.
4. Prior to submitting for a building permit, the plans will be changed to show the
lollowing:
a. The fire wall betvreen Units 7 and I will be drawn corectly.
b. The junipers along the eastern property line of Lot 9 witl be
shown in their accurate location.
c. Building elevations ol the exisling building will be redrawn lo be
the same scale as lhe proposed elevation drawings and will
accurately reflect existing conditions on the properly.
Ms. Fritzlen
June 3, 1994
Page Two
5.Any|reesorshrubsonoradjacenitotne'propertythatdieasaresu|to|lhe
constructio-n oitn" rn"in residences musi be replaced wittrlike species and -
size.
6. Prior to the issuance of a demolition or builcling permit for the proposed
remodel the following items must be completed:
a- Statf must be contacted to perform an on-site inspection of the
-
existing units 1o confirm the GRFA as shown on the drawings of
the existing building.
b.Theapp|icantmustreceiveTexasTownhomeAssociation
approvit for the proposed use a9d'i-mprovements on association
pioperty, i.e. the paver walkwa{ amendments to existing
iandscaping and use of parking lot for staging purposes'
c. The applicant must amend their drawings in order to show
compiiance with the nonconforming section of the Town ol Vail
Municipal Code. Please contact staff for a description of where
the plans presented to lhe DRB would violate the nonconforming
seclion of the Code.
lf vou have any questions, or need lurther clarification, of any of the conditions imposed by
in6 OnA on June 1, 1994, please contact me immediately so that we all have a clear
,no.r.rrnoing of the information which must be addressed prior to the issuance of a
demolition oriuilding permit for the proposed Thain residences remodel.
Sincerely,
l. -//Ilt-*t,. (-rr--,ADr--
Jim Curnutte ./
Town Planner
xc: Tom Moorhead
Krislan PriE
Rick Rosen
MichaelSmith
JaY Peterson
Diana Donovan
John Thain
{e
I hc'pe each ,rf y,:'t-l wi l1 take the t iirre t':' visit ths Th;rirr
redeve l r,prrlerr! t,f Unit E in the Texag Tr'wrrh':rrteg. It ig arr
c,utstarrcjing exarnplGt trf what happerrs ul[-t err t ':'r:, rflr-tch i5 a1lc'ufed
':'t't fJnF I ':'t .
The tr.eeg at thr,r !]treet r:clge *r-e al l c,rr asstreiat inn pr'':perty.
The cunstrt-tct i':'rr wa11 is the appr'':'xiritate I':'cat i':'n '--' f the
pt'c,penty I irre. Nc,t j.ce the pipal bett'reerr the t'ra11 .er'd the
:;treet. N*t ire the L'r,:ken and ntigsirrg hr*n*hlls urr the
Lc,tlqerpc,le F:tirr€l arrd A*perr:: p1r-tr; tt'rer ntisgiirrg bar"k ':'rr tirer
Oaprer,s. I expect rr:,:::t ':'f tlre ilsperrs t':' d ie r'rith iri f ive
yila l- s,
Appr',r>lirrr"rte1.y 5 f e--b e?ast {,f thsl d,:,r-rtrl.e Fleperr rrea}" the 1:il-e
hyrJl'.lv,1 i:: l:hrl Fr.,rpei'ty l irrtt ,:tf .e pie :+haped ':'pen EFare
p*r."*1 Lhat q't'cnri tt, :r pOirr{: 5 frset tle'/,:,rtdr trr-rt irr l irre t"litl-l
their derck, 'l'lre ea=.t walI i:: tfie br"rilrlinq ;:r"r'perty Iirre' ft:;
y.'r-t rarr see! c,-:rrett'uc.t it,rr ig; ,l'rr fi:irri3r' Vail Ft'':'Fer-ty arrd tht:
''l-r)f,rlr-it.- st r.e_"arrr l;r.*ct, Fls r+e11, pier"s f ':,r. tl-te et:lfilrrl':,rr Fl.1 ll.
*ir-rppc,r.t ;tr.r! Lrrr d, r-$" pt.':'Ftet ty wi thr:,-rt per-rrt i :igj i ':'rr €irrd pipe i:i
tit,:i.ed r.rndFi. c,r-ri. ti*cl.:., The f ir.e escape st;rir- has bererr g':'rte
g' i rrr* i:':,rtgt t'r-tct i. c,rr gt art ed.
[3r.r,:itt rfit.r= t..tit ij t,:' be qi.vr*rr t,:, LhP tt+,:, lat'[l{? sJv0]rHr"€r€rr'rs irr tire
fr.c,rrt. 'fak*: ;i g':,':'d 1r::trrk,.. y,::'t-l r':,r-tld rr':tt ::ee tht"':'r-tuh tl-lelrl
when tlre prr'.j er-'t beg.:rr.
f.J,:, c,:,rrstr-r-lct i ':'rr vehicleFj Het*e t,:, Lre par-lled irr the a::5':rc i at i ':'rl
pilr,k irlq 1':'t Fr,rr. t-:he stagirrg p:1arr. Y'::r r-r carr ':l'h6eI've the d"-inla!e
t,:, thel ;rsiei':lr j. "ct inrrt s, l. ':'t Liltt belc;ir.t'j;e t fre l-hilirt's l"3rttEid
rr,::,thirrg l;,:i d,: witlr the al;s':r:ial: j.,:'n i"l el lt*rvt: trt girtlplF rrl€r-e115 tt:
have therrt i'epair' the darrtaqe.
'1'lri:s prr',:r.jt.lct l'r*i:r.'ivEl ;:l i:i5l:,t iir ;il1 ':f r'rh j.r::h jsi 1':cat*tl irr a
r,ew b:r:-.srner,t, F,:,t' r'll-rat j.:i rr,:w r"e.rIl'1r ':'ne ut-rit f ':'r i-rc'1i dtty
r.r:;r-r, Tlrey lrsvu+ play-sl,J al l l;he !larrle|] with l':r:k'able d*':r's t':
be ca .1. L ed E '-tri i t =.
'1 fris,, 1. i l.le tlre llc,t-rr ice i*eldevelc,pnterrtn is .trr E:'xceL lertt exattrtple
uJ" wh r..l rr tlre tt,wrr =h,rr-ricl l:e =a.yirrq "err{:'r-tEh" ll lll!ll
Ect*i:er 13t L934
T':r^ln ':f Va i I
75 Sar-rt tr Fr*nrrtager Rr:atJ
VaiI, CO e1657
Dean FEf,r DRB, f#and r,:utreilt
Althc,r-tgfr they have rr':' Fr',::'FEt"'t! y f,r;, pr-rt a cit'cr-tl'ari dlaivF:r ':r11r
Afrl sr.lr.Ei they r..r i. l. I be $s,,1{ j.ng 1=,:r. r",:'rl+, l:r"ick fr'r' thnrrtr i"rrt}"y
;:r,l;t*. F,e-r.lr;rps we c,:,rrLd pra5Ei *irr ':'i"dinarrrg3 al l':iwirrg a rlen'-rrl
r;ign {:,:,r' pe,:,pl.e likel bhir; thab says "I arrr rir-'h and
i InF,:'i- i: ant ' " That rrr i qfr! tr:rve f trtlgr' rrtlLlat i ve i rrrpat:t r:.jA"'P-zc*--ane
Iiin1:pr'*Lyt -.rrzd-{a
.,ltL-/A<rPAtA<2/'/n?72)
owl)
o
l .., - '
FS This is nat neant tc, get arryorrF in tror-rble but ta call
yout attenti,rn to the intpacts of the approvals that are being
ii..r*r,. I r-rnderstand it ig crrnntsn praetice anrong ar"chiteets
ind devel,rpens to say whatever. is neces$ary ta qet appr''rvals
(pat t ier-rlarly arrrctnq the bigger. f il"r'16) and then dc, whatever
you want until y|fu get ceught. I have been.q6ssti,rnirrg these
professianalg as I ec,roe in cnrrtact with thern so they are trty
;,tr.6.ce for that etrmrr1ent. Thete are not enough inspeetors tn
check br.ri lcling endes as wel. 1 ag corrdit irng r,f appPnval. Toa
much ig slippinq tht'*ugh the cracks'
!tti
slL{hv
slnft(
elt /t1
o
F ,1. t r'lPl
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303479-2138/ 479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
Seplember 2, 1994
Deparrrnent of Community Development
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Glarificalion of zoning issues related to lhe remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A,
88, and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing
Dear Lynn:
This letter is intended to respond to your letter received in our office August 10, 1994
requesting furlher clarification on several zoning issues atfecting the above-referenced
remodel. I have provided a response to each of the items listed in your letter as follows:
1. Cold roof addition uo to 6 inches in depth - The Gommunity Development policy
dated April 3, 1991 states that a cold roof vent, not exceeding 12 inches in
height, measured from the sheathing to the top of the shingles, is considered
an architectural projection and will not be included in the height.
Wndow sill oroiections less than 3 inches - As discussed with you previously,
window sill projections will not be allowed. In my letter to you dated May 13, .
1994, staff agreed with your contention that the existing perimeter line of the
building establishes the legal extent of the buildings setback nonconformity.
Existing and new GHFA (250 additions) may be reananged within the shell of
the existing building, and underground, as as the perimeler lines ars not
you did not
ment the exact sill projections on the building before it
was tom down, there is no way for staff to assure that the new window sill
projections exactly match the old. lf you feel that window sill projections are
necessary, it would be acceptable to move the entire building wall in 3 inches.
This would allow window sills to project no further than the previous building
wallline.
acceptable to relocate the plumbing roof vents as long as the projection will be
lhe same as what previously existed.
exceeded.
I
Ms. Fritzlen
September 2,1994
Page Two
4. Ornamental brick work proiections up to 3 inches - Please see response to
question number 3 above.
5. Roof qutters and down spouts less than 6 inches in dimension - Staff does not
believe that roof gutters and down spouls are integral to the mass and bulk of
the building and will allow for them assuming they have received Design
Review Board (DRB) apProval.
6. Rool eave extensions up lo 8 inches - Please see response to question number
3 above,
7. Skvliqht curbs and flashino - Stalf feels that skylight curbs and llashing would
be acceptable provided they are reasonable in size and the projection is kept to
a minimum (does not include bubble or dome type) and they have received
DRB approval.
8. Status of the exterior soiral stair - As stated on your approved DRB plans and
building permit construction drawings, the spiral staircase was not supposed to
be removed at any time during the construction, Therefore, you are currently in
violation of your building permit. I have spoken with Dan Stanek, Town of Vail
Building Inspector, as well as Gary Murrain, Town of Vail Chiel Building Official,
regarding the ability to replace the spiral stair. Both Gary and Dan agreed that
the spiral stair cannol be replaced due to the fact that it does not currently meel
building code. However, since the spiral stair was required to remain as a part
ol your project approval, Gary and Dan had no objection to you moditying the
existing stair or providing a new stair which does meet code and replacing it per
the approved plans. A new slair would need to match the old slair in terms of
size, shape, circumlerence, etc. and receive DRB approval.
I hope the above information is helpful to you as you proceed wilh the remodel of the Thain
residence. However, if additional information or clarification is necessary, please feel free to
give me a call at 479-2138. lf there are portions of this letter which the Thains do not agree
with and wish to appeal, they may do so according to the procedures outlined in Chapter
18.66.030 of the Vail Municipal Code. Staff would recommend, however, that it the Thains do
not agree with this letter, or any portion of it, you do not proceed with revised drawings or
construction of any of the items ol this letter until the Planning and Environmental Commission
(PEC) has had the opportunity to review staff's opinion on all items contained in this letter.
W'aM
Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
Tom Moorhead
Mike Mollica
xc:
I o
Ms. Fritzlen
September 2,1994
Page Three
P.S' lt has come to our attention that your contractor is using Town of Vail owned land
dhectly behind the Thain residence for construction staging. The staging of equipment
on Town land is not acceptabls and was not shown on your approved plans. Please
desist from using public property for the construction of the Thain residences.
\
August 5, 1994
O trtit"t"rrpi"r""nrirrt
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR5
Mr. Jim Curnuttel4r. Mike Mollica
Town of Vail Department of Corununity Development
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail Colorado 81657
RE: Thain ResidenceUnit #8 Texas Townhomes
Dear Ji:n and Mike,
Car:men and John Thain have requested me to obtain fur-
ther clarification on several zoning issues affecting
the devel-oDment of their residence.
1. Building Envelope Lirnitations for a
Structure.
Non Conforming
Current interpletation of the building envelope' as I
understand it linits structure outside of the existingt
including minor projections such as window sills, roof
eaves and ornamental trim.
It appears that several of the other Townhouses have
renoviled and i:nproved their units with without having
had the burden of ttre variance Processr even though
these renovations "punctured" the existing
non-conforming envelope.
If you could you give us some grridance on what minor
projections we can add without a variance and what we
can;t it would be very helpful . I have prepared a lj.st
for review. Some of these items effect our compJ-iance
with the Uniform Building Code.
- Cold Roof addition up to 6" in depth
Unit #7 has adcied a cold roof which is why the two roof
heights no longer match. we wouLd l-ike to match the roof
height of Unit #7 with a cold roof. Zoning currentLy al-
lows projections above the height ]j:niL for cold roof
vents.
- Plumbing roof vents that project above the roof
we are intending to re.l-ocate the roof vents but the pro-
jection will be the same.
- window sill proiections less than 3"
The previous buil-ding had sill projections of up to 3".
- Ornamental brick work projections up to 3"
- Roof gutters and downspouts less than 6 " in dimension
i,,){
- Roof eave extensions up to I "
- Skvl-iqht curbs and fl-ashingSeveral other units within the complex have added
lights with curbs that project above the existing
line.
Pg. 1
0805DRB.DOC
sky-
roof
posT oFFlcE Box 57 1000 LtoNSRtDGE Loop vAtL coLoRADo 81658 303 476 6342 FAX 303 476 4901
ErR(€ fRmLtNN<. O|A nrl4tr Prtic! 8rlNlR
Otrtit"l"opi"r".nrint
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS
2. Status of the Exterj-or Spiral Stair
Mike Churchill of Duddy Viele Construction told me that
the spi-ral stair was temporarily removed to Protect it
from damage during demolition. During that time Dan
Stannick from the TOv building department tofd Mark
that he did not want the stair to be replaced due to its
non-compiiance with the Building Code. Is this correct
and do you have any further direction at this time. As
you are ahrare the removal of the stair needs to be ad-
dressed with the owner's of unit #7. The Thain's have
always intended to giwe the use of the stair to their
neighbors.
?hank you for your help.
itzlen.,
en eierr6e Briner
\._.._-.
cc: Rick Rosen
Mike Snith
Mark Churchill
Carmen Thain
Pg, 2
0805DR8. DOC
posT oFFtcE Box 57 1000 LtoNSRtDGE Loop vAtL coLoRADo 81658 303 476 6342 FAX 303 476 4901
PrrRct Fn?|En ftc o,A timuN P]flct 8R|!ER
\
w\l
\\o
\t
rQ.N
\
v)
\
\N
\-
\0t
t\
?
$
N
^-R
$N l
*$J
irNF u\\\u
R TN
\\r
\\ \N
| 1; I
F!I.E COPY
3. An appeal of a staff decision regarding nonconforming structures, demo/rebuilds,
4.
setbacks, and the use of the 250 Ordinance pertaining to the Thain devel
proposal located at
Appellant: Jay Peterson, representing Helen Chatfield
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jay Peterson stated that he had appealed a staff decision regarding the issues
contained in Jim Curnutte's letter dated May 13, 1994 on behalf of Helen Chatfield. He
then stated that he was wilhdrawing the appeal before the PEC, as well as the appeal
on behalf of Diana Donovan, appealing the DRB approval ol the Thain remodel. He
stated that he had reached a settlement with the applicants on this issue.
Kristan Pritz asked Jay to write a letter to the Community Development Department
stating lhat he was withdrawing both appeals.
Jay agreed to do so.
A request for a worksesslon for an amendment to a previously approved plan to allow
for four duplexes to be constructed at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge
3rd Filing.
Applicant: SteveGensler/Parkwood Realty
Planner: Andy Knudtsen/Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a presentation per the staff memo. He stated that the purpose of
today's worksession was to review the site plan and to discuss the issues stalf has
identified in the memo.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the two main issues they should focus on today was
the site planning and the number of units.
Peter Koliopoulis, the project architect, stated that grading for the site veered olf
towards the southeast. He stated that they were trying to develop a concept around
four duplex buildings (eight units), where each of the building forms were unique to
each other. He said that the buildings would be accessed off ol Lion's Ridge Loop and
that there would be a maximum 8% slope for the driveway. He stated that the roof
lorms would all be gables, at 8:12 pilches.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the PEC would like to see the existing stand of trees to
the north ol Capslone Townhomes remain on the site. She asked Peter whether it
would be possible lo work this project around thes€ trees.
Peter Koliopoulis stated that they would like to work with the PEC, as well as with the
adjacent property owners, to come up with a solution.
Pbooing l|d Environmcolrl Comi{ttion
Juno 13, 1994
I
June 3O, 1994
Town ,rf Vail
The undersigned, as secretary c,f the Texas Townhouge
H,:nreowners Ass,:ciat inn, on behalf c,f the Fnard of Directorghereby gt.ante approval fc,t" accese ac!.$!rs ths assc,ciati,rnpr"operty located tc, the gouth rf lnts B and g sub.ject ta theowner of lots I and g neplacirrg arry danaged landscapefeatures with iteme of equal m. better" qual ity arrd size thanexistit"rg, No living matter. is tn be renr,ved. Assnciationproper'ty Iandscape featur.ee must be r"egt r-,r.ed frrl lawingeonstruct i c'n.
T'his apprnval is alsa subject tc, final desiqn appr"oval by theasg,:ciat ion for" the permanerrt r-enroval of any landscape rocksorr associat ian praperty.
Respectful lv.lD^fr-;O*w"J
D i ana Donovan
Secretary
Texas Townhouge Homeswners Aggnc i.at i orr
o
0 1e94
TO\d.CO[I/1IVL DEV. DETT,
tlers i grr Review f.r,:ard ctecigicn af June 1t
A and H pf the Texag Townhorrteg known ag
4BJ Glc,re Cleek Dt'i ve.
June l0r 1994
J i rn Ct-trnt-tt t e
'T,:wn of Vai I C'rtnrnur'ity
75 South Frontage Road
Vailn Cn 61657
Dear Jimt
We wi.ih tc, appeal the
1994 regarding unit I
the Thain regiderree at
str'eer*1fi1N
D i arra and Jc'hn Dc,rr'trvan
Deve I nornent
'f,wnerg ,rf 7A; Texas T,:wnhc,rrtes
lt]14 Homestake Circle
VeiL, 0o 81657
o
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmential Commission
Community Development Department
June 13, 1994
An appeal of a staff decision regarding nonconforming structures,
demo/rebuilds, setbacks, and the use of the 250 Ordinance pertaining to the
Thain developmsnt proposal located at 483 Gore Creek Drive/Lob 8A, 88, and
9, Texas Townhouses, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Appellant: Jay Peterson, representing Helen ChatfieldPlanner: Jim Curnutte
I. INTRODUCTION
Jay Peterson, on behalf of Helen Chatfield, owner of Lot 7, Texas Townhomes, is appealing
all items set forth in the statl interpretation letter dated May 13, 1994 regarding a proposed
remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 8B, and 9, Texas Townhomes, VailVillage 4th Filing
(see attached copy). The Texas Townhomes are zoned High Density Multi-Family (HDMF).
The Thains own two units located at the easternmost end of the Texas Townhomes. The
Thains would like to tear down Units 8A and 8B and construct two n6$r residences in their
place (keeping only the western and southern building foundation walls). Because of the way
the Texas Townhomes property has been subdivided, the existing building is considered to be
nonconforming with regard to minimum lot size, setcacks, GRFA, etc. The Thains have
agreed that the nor building would not increase the existing mass and bulk of the building.
Additionally, the Thains have applied to use two 250 additions in conjunction with the
proposed construction ol the new building.
Since Mr. Peterson is appealing all items set forth in the staff letter dated May 13, 1994.
Each of the six paragraphs therein will be further discussed as follows:
Paraoraph #'t from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
'The Thain property is zoned High Dercity Multi-Famlly and is
nonconforming with regard to minimum lot size, sgtbacks, GRFA, etc. lt
is considered to be a legally nonconforming building. Staff agrees wlth
your interpretatlon of the nonconforming section ol the Vail Municipal
Code whlch would allow the Thains to remove a substantial portion of the
building and build an entirely new building provided the existing
nonconformity is not increased. As you have discusssd previously wlth
Mike Mollica, the mass and bulk of the building (i.e. building footprints,
height, setbacks, and GRFA - excluding the 250 Ordinance addition)
cannot be increased in any way. The proposed stairs on the rear of the
building, as presented at conoeptual Design Review Board (DRB) review,
would be considered a violation of the non-conlormang sectaon ol the
Code. Staff believes that the rear access to the bassment must be
removed."
COPYF I[.E
TO:
FROM;
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Staff Response
Section 18.64.010 (Purpose) of the nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code states
that:
'This chapter is intended to limit the number and extent of nonconforming uses
and structures by prohibiting or limiting their enlargement, their reestablishment
after abandonmenl, and their restoration after substiantial destruction. While
permitting nonconforming uses, structures and improvements to continue, this
chapter is intended to limit enlargement, alteration, restoration, or replacement
which would increase the disgrepancv between existino conditions and'the
development standards prescribed bv this title."
Additionally, Section 18.64.040 (Uses) states that:
'The use of the site or structure lawfully established prior to the effeclive date
of the ordinance codified in this title which does not conform to the use
regulations prescribed by this title for the district in which it is situated may be
continued, orovided that no such nonconformino use shall be enlaroed to
occupv the oreater site area or buildino floor area than it occuoied on the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chaoter..."
Staff considered the following elements before determining that the Thains could substantially
remodel their unit:
A. The intent of the nonconformino section of the Code. - Generally,
nonconforming sections of zoning codes are created for the purpose of assuring
the eventual removal of noxious uses or activities that are not compatible with
surrounding uses. Staff believes that the Texas Townhomes' nonconformity
was created as a result of the method used to subdivide the property and we
would not consider the entire building to be the type of nonconforming use
which should eventually be removed from the property. In light of the fact that
the staff believes that the Town is not attempting to require the eventual
removal of the entire building from the property, and due to the fact that the
Town does encourage the upgrade of older buildings throughout town, statf has
looked at the proposed remodel of the Thain residence as something that would
be of benefil to the Town provided the new building did not increase the
discrepancy between the existing conditions and the development standards
established by the property's zoning. Since the applicant has agreed that the
building's mass and bulk (i.e. building footprint heights, setbacks, GRFA, etc.)
would not be increased in any way as a result ol the remodel, the staff has no
objection to the proposed tear down/rebuild.
B. Can an applicant voluntarilv tear down a nonconformino structure and build a
new structure as lono as the nonconformiw is not increased? - Section
18.64.060 (Maintenance and Repairs) states that:
"Nonconforming uses, structures, and site improvements may be
maintained and repaired as necessary for convenient, safe, and
efficient operation of the use, provided frat the maintenance and
repair does not increase the discrepancy between the use,
structure, or site improvement and the development standard
prescribed in the Town Code."
Section 18.64.090 (Hestoration) states hat:
"Whenever a nonconforming use which does not conlorm
with the regulations of the district in which it is located or
a nonconforming structure or site improvement which
does not conlorm with the requirements for setbacks,
height, density control, building bulk control, or site
coverage is destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of
God, or by the public enemyt its use may be resumed or
the structure may be restored, provided the restoration is
commenced within one year and diligently pursued to
completion."
Although the above paragraph does not include reference to the voluntary
removal of a nonconforming building, it does seem clear that a nonconforming
use or structure may be restored within one year after its demolition.
C. Complete or substantial removal. - The Town has previously determined ftat a
tear down/rebuild is the "ultimate remodel". Because of this determination and
the fact that two of the building's foundation walls will remain, statf believes that
this applicalion should be considered a substantial remodel ol an existing
building rather than a complete removal of a non-conforming structure.
Paraoraph #2 from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes turo additional 250
square toot applications. Section 18.71.030 H (Additional Gross
Residential Floor Area) states that any dwelling unit in a multi-family
dwelling shall be eligible for additional GBFA not to excsed a maximum of
250 square feet in addition to the existing GRFA for the site provided that
no exterior additions or alterations to multFfamily dwellings, with the
exception of window skylights or other similar modifications, shall be
allowed. The Thains are proposang to utilaze two 250 ordinanoes tor the
two dwelling units within the existing shell ot the building and construct a
basemsnt when the new building is constructed. Therefore, the GRFA
attributsd to the two 250's shall not alter the exterior of the dwelling units.
sance the 250 section of the code does not allow for the pooling of
additional GRFA, it is important that each 2!i0 square toot addition be
directly attributed to each dwelling unlt."
Staff Response
Since the Thain units (Units 8A and 8B) have been in existence for more than five years, they
are entitled to apply for two additional 250 square foot additions. Because these units are
located within a multiJamily building, the proposed 250's shall not result in any exterior
addilions or alterations to the building, with the exception of windows, skylights, or other
similar modifications. Additionally, the 250 Ordinance does not allow lor the pooling of
additional GRFA, therefore, each of the 250's must be directly attributed to the existing
dwelling units.
Paraqraph #t from the Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"Staff does not believe that the building will become more nonconforming with
the addition ot the proposed 250 applications. The 250 section of the Vail
Municipal Code does allow lor the addition of 250 square teet ot GRFA per unit
in addition to the exasting GRFA on a property even if the exasting GRFA on the
property already exceeds the allorrvable. This provision applies to all properties
throughout town and is not specific to the Thain residence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Addilionally, staff agrees with your contention that the existing perimeter line of
the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity. Existing
and new GRFA (250 additions) may be rearranged within the shell of the existing
building, and underground, as long as the perimeter lines are not exceeded. Anv
above or below grade expansion of the building which would extend beyond the
perimeter line established by the existing building walls, or break the plane of
the existing roof or chimney lines would require variances from the
noncontorming and setback sections of the Town Gode. Below grade
expansions are permitted provided they do not extend beyond the perimeter
lines established by the existing building footprint. Variances would be required
for below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building tootprint."
Staff Response
Staff does not believe that the existing building will become more noncontorming as a result of
the 250 additions because the existing mass and bulk of the building will be unaffected. Also,
there would not be any increase in the discrepancy betvveen the existing conditions and the
development standards allowed in the HDMF zone district.
With regard to the setback nonconformity, staff has made the interpretation that the existing
perimeter line of the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity.
Existing and new GRFA may be rearranged within the shell of the existing building, and
underground, as long as the perimeter lines are not exceeded. Staff believEs that any above
grade or below grade expansion which would break the plane of the existing nonconlormity
would require variancss lrom the Town Code.
o
Paraoraph #4 from the Mav 19. 1994 tettgr:
"Staff does not agree with Jay Peterson's lntenretation that the Thaln unlhr
should fall lnto the single family dwEiling and two family dsreiltng category
described In sectaon 18.71.020 of the vail Municipal Gode. we believe that the
Thain resldence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelllng criteria outlined in
Section 18.71.030. Section 18.04.090 of the Vail Municipal Gode defines multi-
family dwelllngs as:
. "A buildlng containing three or more dwelling unlts, including
townhouses, rowhousos, apartments, and condominlum unlts,
designed for or used by thr€s or more families, each llving as an
indepsndent housekeeping unlt."
Section 17.08.40 defines a townhouse as:
"A building that has one tamily dwelling units erected in a
row or in a clustered fashlon as a single bullding on
adloining lots, each being separate from the adlolning unit
or units by a parly wall or walls extending from the
basement floor to the roof along the dividlng lot llne, and
each such building being separate from any other building
by space on all sides."
Clearly, the Toxas Townhomes building meets the definition of a townhouse
building and ls therefore considered to Ue a multFfamily bullding, as it relates to
determlnation of the unit type category described in the addltional 250 section of
the code."
Staff Resoonse
For the reasons stated in the May 13, 1994 letter, stafl believes that the Texas Townhomes
clearly meet fie definition of a townhouse and is therefore considered to be a multi{amily
building, as it relates to the determination of unit type category described in the additional 250
section of the Code.
Paraoraph #5 from tho Mav 13. 1994 letter:
"As you know, In order to apply for a 250, evidence must be provided that
the unil or unlts have received a final Certiticate of Occupancy. During
our last meetlng, you requested that stafl review the Town flles to
determine whether or nol a final Certiticate of Occupancy has evsr been
gEnted lor Units 8A or 88 at the Texas Townhomes. Stafl is unable to
locate any record ot a final Certificate of Occupancy beang assued tor
either d tho units. Therefore, in order to proceed with your 250
applicatlon, you must request that the bulldlng department perform a tinal
Certificate of Occupancy inspection on the Thain units and provide a copy
of the certiticates to the planning staff."
Staff Resoonse
Staff requested that the applicant provide either a copy of their final Certificate of Occupancy
for the Texas Townhomes or request a final inspection ol the unib from the Building
Department. Since writing the May 13, 1994 letter, staff has consulted with Gary Murrain
(Town of Vail Chief Building Official) regarding the possibility of performing a final Certificate
of Occupancy inspection on the Thain units. Gary determined that since these units were built
so long ago (in Eagle County) and it is unclear under which code the units were constructed,
he would not be,able to pertorm a final Certificate of Occupancy on these units.
Paraoraph #6 trom the Mav 13. 1994letter:
"Also mentioned during our conversation on Wednesday, please provide a
copy of Association approval to temporarily remove the existing
landscape amenaties (grass, rocks, etc.) currently existing on the
Associataon property, located directly in front of Lots 8 and 9. Please
address how you intend to landscape this area after the constructaon on
your landscape plan."
Statf Resoonse
We do not believe that Jay Peterson has any oblection to this paragraph.
c:bec\memos\cfi atlisl.6 | 3
o o
F !!- E C$PV
75 South Fronnge Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
Deparnnent of Connnuniry Developtnent
May 13, 1994
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
FE: Proposed remodel ol the Thain residence, Lols 8A, 8B and g, Texas Townhomes, Vail
Village 4th Filing.
Dear Lynn:
Thls letler is inlended lo documenl the discussion which took place during our meeting
yeslerday, Wednesday May 11, 1994, concerning the above-referenced remodel. I hope this
letler will be helpful in clarifying many of lhe issues raised by yourself, thE Thain's legal
counsel, and Jay Peterson, counsel lor Helen Chatfield. I have broken out each ol the major
issues related to lhe proposed Thain residence remodel and have listed them as follows:
1. The Thain property is zoned High Density Mutti-Family and is nonconforming
with'regard lo minimum lol size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. tt is considered to be a
legally nonconforming building. Stalf agrees with your interprelation of the
nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code which would allow the Thains
lo remove a subslantial portion of ths building and build an entirely new building
provided the existing nonconformity is nol increased. As you have discussed
previously with Mike Mollica, lhe mass and bulk of the building (i.e. building
tootprints, height, setbacks,'and GRFA - excluding the 250 Ordinance addition)
cannot be increased in any way. The proposed stairs on the rear of the
building, as presenled at conceptual Design Beview Board (DRB) review, would
be considered a violation of the non-conforming section of the Code. Statf
believes lhat lhe rear access to the basement must be removed.
2. The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes two additional 250
square foot applications. Seclion 18.71.030 H (Additional Gross Residential
Floor Area) stales that any dwelling unit in a multi-family dwelling shall be
eligible for additional GRFA not to exceed a marimum of 250 square feet in
addition to the existing GRFA for the site provided that no exterior additions or
alterations to multl-family dwellings, with the exception of window skylights or
other similar modifications, shall be allowed. Tha Thains are proposing to
utilize two 250 ordinances for lhe two dwelling units wilhin the existing shell of
lhe building and construct a basement when the new building is construcled.
Therefore, lhe GRFA attributed to the two 250's shall not alter the exterior of
the dwelling units. since the 250 section of the Gode does not allow for lhe
poofing ol addilional GRFA, it is important that each 250 square {oot addition be
directly atlributed lo each dwelling unit.
o
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Two
3. staff does not believe that the building will become more noncohforming with
the addition ol the proposed 250 applications. The 250 section of the Vail
Municipal Code does allow for lhe addition of 250 square feet of GRFA per unit
in addition to the existing GRFA on a property even if the existing GBFA on the
property already exceeds the allowable. This provision applies l0 allproperties
throughout lown and is not specific to the Thain residence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Additionally, staff agrees wilh your contention that thg existing perimeter line of
the building esiablishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformity. Existing
and new GRFA (250 additions) may be rearranged within the shell of the
existing building, and underground, as long as the perimeler lines are not
exceeded. AOI above grade expansion of the building which would exlend
beyond the perimeter line established by the existing building walls, or break
the plane of the existing roof or chimney lines would require variances trom the
nonconforming and setback sections of the Town Code. Below grade
expansions are permitled provided they do not exlend beyond the perimeler
lines established by the existing building footprint. Variances would be required
for below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building fooprint.
4. Statf does not agree with Jay Peterson's interprelation that the Thain unils
should fall into the single lamily dwelling and two family dwelling category
described in Section 18.71.020 of the Vail Municipal Code. We believe lhat the
Thain residence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelling crileria oullined in
Section 18.71.030. Seclion 18.04.090 of the Vail Municipal Code defines multi-
family dwellings as:
'A building containing three or more dwelling units, including
lownhouses, rowhouses, apartmenls, and condominium units,
designed for or used by lhree or more families, each living as an
independent housekeeping unit."
Section 17,08.240 defines a lownhouse as:
"A building that has one family dwelling units erected in a row or
in a cluslered fashion as a single building on adjoining lots, each
being separate from the adjoining unit or units by a party wall or
walls exlending lrom the basement floor to lhe roof along the
dividing lot line, and each such building being separate from any
other building by space on all sides."
,I
J
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Three
Clearly, the Texas Townhomes building meets tha definition of a lownhouse
building and is therefore considered to be a multFfamily building, as.it relates to' determination of the unit type category described in the additional 250 section
of the Code.
5. As you know, in order lo apply for a 250, evidence must be provided that the
unit or units have received a final Certificate ol Occupancy. During our last
meetlng, you requested that staff review the Town liles to determine whether or
not a final Certificate of Occupancy has ever been granted for Unils 8A or 8B at
fie Texas Townhomes. Staff is unable to locat€ any record of a linal Gertificate
of Occupancy being issued for either of th6 units. Therefore, In ordEr to
proceed with your 250 application, you must request that thE building
department perform a final Certificate of Occupancy inspection on thE Thain
units and provide a copy of the certificates lo the planning stafl.
6. Also mentioned during our conversation on Wednesday, please provictg a copy
of Association approval to lemporarily r€move the existing landscape amenities
(grass, rocks, etc.) currently existing on the Associatlon property, located
directly in lront of Lots 8 and 9. Please address how you intend to landscape
this area afler the construction on your landscape plan.
I betieve the above information accurately describes our conversation on Wednesday May 1 1,
1991. However, il you are not in agre€ment with any of the information contained in this. letter, please contact me immediately to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,t' . -JA!/'?rv \Aarn/ul/Q/
Tl
Jim Cumutte
Town Planner
xc: Tom Moorhead
lfislan Pritr
Rick Rosen
Mark Smith
Mike Mollica
Jay Peterson
Barl,gY, Hennnvc & PBTERSoN
A PRoFESSIoNAL CORPONATTON
ATToRNEYSATI,AW
LINCOLN CENTER
1660 LINCOIN STREET, SUITE 3175
DENVEN. COLORADO 8023{
TELEPHONE (303) $7-r660
FACSIMILE (So8) 837'ooe7
May 23, L994
tt
VAIL NATIONAL BANK BLDC.
IOt SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST, SUITE
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
TELEPSoNE (S03) {70.0092
FACSTMILE (80S) {70.040?
Mr. Jin Curnutte
Town of Vail Planner
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road l{est
VaiL, Colorado 8L657
RE: Lot I, Ttre Rowhouses
Dear Jim:
on instructions from Helen chatfield, who is an adjacent property ownerof Lot 8, The Rowhouses, she hereby appeals the Staff interpretation of
alt iterns set forth in your letter of May 13, L994 regarding the
expansion and alteration to Lot 8, The Rowhouses.
If you have any guestions please contact me at my office.
Sincerely,
terson
COPYFIL T
TOWNOFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I s9
FAX 303-479-2452
June 3, 1994
Deparunent of Comntuniry Developtnent
Lynn Fritzlen
Fritzlen Pierce Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Design Review Board (DRB) conditions of approval for the proposed remodel of the
Thain residence, Lols 8A, 88 and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Dear Lynn:
This letter is intended to document lhe conditions attached to the DRB approval of the
proposed Thain residence remodel which received DRB approval on June 'l , 1994. The
remodel of the Thain units were approved by a 4-0 vote ol the DRB. The DRB attached the
following conditions to their approval:
1. The exterior bricks proposed lor the new residences shall be of the color and
style presented at the DRB meeting. A photo of the approved brick is kept in
the Community Development Department file and is dated June 1, 1994. The
DRB condition includes the color, size and style of the brick and color of the
mortar.
2. All metal railings on the property including the gate at the entrance to Unit A will
not have the decorative leatures as shown on the plan presented to the DRB.
All pickets shallbe square or rectangle metal rails.
3. The west side of lhe rear deck must be linished with a solid red'vood skirting.
4. Prior to submitting for a building permit, the plans will be changed to show the
following:
a. The fire wall between Units 7 and 8 will be drawn correctly.
b. The junipers along the eastern property line of Lot 9 will be
shown in their accurate location.
c. Building elevations of the existing buiHing will be redrawn to be
the same scale as the proposed elevation drawings and will
accurately reflect existing conditions on the property.
Ms. Fritzlen
June 3, 1994
Page Two
5. Any trees or shrubs on or adiacent to the property that die as a result of the
construction of the Thain residences must be replaced with like species and
,
size.
6. Prior to the issuance of a demolition or buil3ling permit for the proposed
remodel the following items must be completed:
a. Statf must be contacted to perform an on-site inspection of the
existing units to confirm the GRFA as shown on the drawings ol
the existing building.
b. The applicant musl receive Texas T-ownhome Association
approvaf for ttre proposed use arfimprovemenls on association
pioperty, i.e. the paver walkwaf amendments to existing
landscaping and use of parking lot for staging purposes.
c. The applicant must amend their drawings in order io show
compliance with the nonconforming section of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code. Please contact statf for a description of where
the plans presented to the DRB would violate the nonconlorming
section of the Code.
lf you have any questions, or need further clarification, of any of the conditions imposed by
th; DRB on June 1, 1994, please contact me immediately so that we all have a clear
understanding of the information which must be addressed prior to the issuance of a
demolition orbuilding permit lor the proposed Thain residences remodel.
Sincerely,/1, -/+lLz,' '-r'rrr.rr^rL4)/
Jim Curnutte ./
Town Planner
xc: Tom Moorhead
Kristan Pritz
Rick Rosen
MichaelSmith
Jay Peterson
Diana Donovan
John Thain
oo
Gsign Review Action Ott
TOWN OF VAIL
catesory Nrru", 6 o^" 6/,/q q
p,q"at"^"' --fAain ct q r { s (u'*- i{s 4*8)
Buildins n ^",
-T-€ XqS -7Gc,,sc, lr"erv',,eS
Proiect Description:*f wo'
-- | ..\
owner, Address anapnone: ;Jol^n { Lal'tu€yl I harn
65 OL '^ct 4>lw H{/os
ArchitecVContact, Address and Phone: L
/o /.
Legal Description:t-o|flrqet1 Block ........- tubd'u'"'on /4,zone District HD/4 F
ProiectstreetA66r"""' ul€3 E Get Cre
Motion by:2,L b
seoonded ov dg €€ &
fl Disapproval
! StatfApproval
oQc-o^ra{.
taff Action
vote: 1l-O
Conditions:
DRB Fee ere-oaia # O*
ZONINC
18.62.090 Related permits and requirements.
In addition to the conditions which may be prescribed
pursuant to this chapter, any site or use subject to a variance
permit shall also be subject to all other procedures, permits, and
iequirements of this and other applicable chapters and
regulations of the town. ln event of any conflict between the
provisions of a variance permit and other permit or
requirement, the more restrictive provision shall prevail. (Ord.
8(1e73) $ 1e.900.)
Chapter 18.64
NONCONFORMING SITES, USES, STRUCTURES
AND SITE IMPRO\IEMENTS
Sections:
18.64.010 Purpose.
18.64.020 Continuance.
18.64.030 Sites.
18.64.040 Uses.
18.54.050 Stmctures and site improvement.
18.64.060 Maintenance and repairs.
18.64.070 Discontinuance.
18.64.080 Ctrange of use.
18.64.090 Restoration.
18.64.010 Purpose.
This chapter is intended to limit the number and extent of
nonconforming uses and structures by prohibiting or limiting
(Vail 4-7-92)
4U
:..: .. : i....:r:.. :.i :.i..i.-:.-rr:iij,i :..:iii:::ilri:
(-i
NON('ONI;ORMtN(; St't't:S. USI.:S. STRUCTURES
ttrcir cnlurycment. their reestablishment aftcr abandonment,lnrl thu.ir restorution aftcr substantial destruction. Whitc
;urrnitling nonconlirnning uscs. structures. and improvementsIo corrlirruc. this clr:rptr.r is intclrdcrl to limit enlaryr:mcnt,
:tllcruliorr. rssloralion. or rL.plJccrlrcnt whiclr woultl incrca:c thc
discrcpuncy bctwccn cxisting conditions and thc devclopnrr:nt
starrdrrrls prcscribcd hy this rirL.. (Ord.lt(t9?3) S 10.100.)
18.64.020 Continuance.
Noncon fonning sitcs. usr.s. structurcs, an<l site
irnprovements lawt'ully cstabtishe d prior to the effective date of
thc ordinancc codified in this ritle may continue. subject to the
limitations prcscritrcd in this chapter. Sites, uses. structures. and
sitc improvements lawfully autlrorized by permits or regutations
ux,isting prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in
this title may continue. subject to such limitatjons as prescribed
by such permits or regulations. (Ord. 8(1973) g :0.200.)
| 8.64.030 Sites.
Srtcs larvtirlly estahlisherl pursuant to regulations in ctJ'cct
pr.ior to the cffective dlte of thr.. ordinance codified in this title
which do not conform to the minimum tot area and dimension
requirements prescribed .by this title for the disrrict in which
they are situated may be continued and shall be deemed legally
established building sites, subject to the site development
standards prescribed by this title. No such site shall be further
rcduced in area or dimensions. (Ord. 8(1973) ! 20.300.)
18.64.040 Uses.
The use of a site or structure lawfully established prior to
the efl'ective date of the ordinance codificd in this title which
docs not conform to the usc regulations prescribed by this title
for the district in which it is situated may be continued,
provided that no such nonconlbrming use shall be enlarged to
occupy a Breater site area for building floor area than jt
occupied on the effective datr. of the ordinance codified in this
cltuptcr. fury subsr,.quent reduction in site area or floor area
...'ii,#:}
. :.-
-...'.'1.
j:::;: j::i:i{:i.{tt
t
:lE4- l tVril e.15.78r
NONCONFORMING SITES, USES, STRUCTURES
occupied by a nonconforming use shalt be
Umitation. untj thc usr: shall not thcreafter
occupy a greater site arca or floor area
limitalion. (Ord. tt(197.1) $ 10.400.)
deemed a new
be entarged to
than such new
18.64.050 Slructures and site improvemenl.
Structures and site improvements lawfully established prior
, \rP./r'=
-'r6o'"8
"e"
to
do
the effective date of the ordinancc codified in this tirte *hich
g.o-nfo1m to the devclopment standards prescribed byfor the district in which they are situated may becontffied. Such structures or site improvements may be
enlarged only in accordance with thc following timitations:-A. Structurcs or site improvements which do not conform to
requirements for setbacks. distances between buitdings,
height, building bulk control, or site @verage, may be
enlarged, provided that the entargement does not further
increase the discrepancy between the total structure and
applicable building bulk control or site coverage standards;ard provided that the addition fully conforms with
setbacks. dist:rnces betrveen buildings, and height stlndards
applicablc to rhe addition.
Struclures rvhich do nol conform to density controts may
be enlargcd, only if the totat gross residential floor area oirhe enlarged structure does not exceed the total gross
residential 0oor area of the preexisting nonconforming
structure.
Stnrctures or site improvements which do not conform to
requiremcnts for uscable open space or tandscaping and site
dcvelopment may be enlarged, provided that the useable
open space rcquiremenrs applicable to such addition shafl be
fully satislied. and provided that the percentage of the totat
site which is landscaped shall not be reduced bclow the
rninirnum requirement.
Structures or site improvements whjch do not conform to
the off-street parking and loading requirements of this title
may be entarged, provided that the parking urd loading
reguirements for such addition shall be fully satisfied and
that the discrepancy between the existing off-street parking
and loading faciljties and the standards prescribed by this
B.
c.
D.
.l
485 (Vril 1.5{2)
ZONING
title shall not be increased.
(ord. 8(1973) 0 20.500.)
ft.64.060 Mrinlenrncc rnd rcprin.
Nonconforming uses, strustures, and site improvements
may bc maintained and repaired as necessary for convcnient,
safe, or efficient opcration or use, providcd that no such
maintenance or repair shall incrcase the discrepancy bctwecn
the use, slructure, or site improvement and the development
standards prescribed by this title. (Ord. 8(1973) 0 20.600.)
It.6{.fl0 Discontinuance.
Any nonconforming use which is discontinued for a period
of twclve months, regardless of any intent to resume operation
of use, shdl not be rcsumcd thereafter, and ury futurc use of
the site or structttres thereon shall conform with the provisions
of this title. (Ord. E(1973) ! 20.700.)
ft.64.0t0 Chenge of use.
A nonconforming use shall not be changed to anorher
nonconforming use unless pcrmission has been granted by the
town council. Prior to granting such permission, thc council
shdl detcrminc that the proposed use does not subsrantially
diffcr from the 'existing nonconforming use in terms oi
compatibility with thc character of the area in which it is
tocated, and the council shdl dacrmine that thc proposed use
docs not increase or aggravatc the dcgree of nonconformity
cxisting prior to any such change of use. (Ord. 8(1973) 0
20.800.)
It.64.090 Rcstontlon.
A. Whenever a nonconforming use which does not conform
with the regulations for thc district in which it is locatcd or a
nonconforming suucture or site improvement which does
not conform with the requircments for setbacks, height,
*
(vril l-5.t2)
4t6 U
-YORK-CONTROLLERS
\ re. n,-e
.rohn A. Thdn
C*rnrn lt. Thrlntt otc Fortng Eroot no|d
fil|. Kheo, ilY 1064t
'JurE l. l00a
Mi J&n Curnile
Efilor Phnnrr
Tbwn d \hX
Dcprnnm d Oormunly Dare|opmcrr
76 gorfi Frotfr€o Bordvt[ oo tlc57
$ FA)(; 0G{29€.153
BE: Rrno,Ihn oa T0(l! Ibxrnnout. UnltEttA rttr #AE
Dnr Ma Cumt8a:
ryr J! y!$.!9 y,q9, to qelg 9uI d!!trs3t or$ tht tr.stmBil whlch haf besn slvan our rppliodimto tllffftf Utlll tBA rnd tEB of $t Tsol lbvrnhoue!. Arwe began thr deslgn procers'inC prn
to qr con$dng thr puctrase cf thc Unhf wr had ou $chhsct, lvnn Filzleri wb* wilt th. i,rMl.lt ftrr aa\r.d tnon|lf o|| 3 dedgn whldr compliccl wlth slt orbtino-lhrn d Vei nquirmeirb. lt b0$ urdrrtmdhg drd our odoinrl proporal rsc€lv.d peilmhaly gtaf rpprwa,
How.Yr, r the hr Dcdgn R3lrtd., Boerd medng or* rppllcabn wa! ttbld. $panntly dr to
oOlocuonr 0f cad|ll qrftnil t'btrr Tounlrqrse ownea. We 6ilwe $t we trsw mdiraeO ro vlrturttydl-d thdr oqocdotlr. .Candn ol thr concarnr nbd by the anen d Unft 7 apperi to b. n cdldngl00l to? th. aottiued uc of our poperty wifrout en easement t!t" * u rtii trarh erdosuru iliqo B|r{of rp}d crfce|c an piivie naten rha $ould grd coukl hffi basn r36otvrt emlcrHyrlfroty rrriilr u rncl *rould nct hilo cfiumad DF*r ilrnr.
A fdltncl omom nbcd.wrr ftt prutGctlqr ol the patty wall and Ore lan<traghg lvs aprntooil&bnbL dme rgvlcluft! locil contrectoft. Wr han h]tba J.L Vlele Consrucdori tdnnorarir'arrunL W. rn conllclcn thl Jlm Vide can qsouts thif profrct wlhort di$urblng any d oof nshhboreA!_{_ttt b#ttrFltg, -r,il1Fc D{c.ptim of ona mrpie rir diresdy ealcrnrio rin uufuhgr-wu b.grov*f. l{b hevr rltcrd thr tortt foundadon Odign to r*Cn rirc tio odrdry lergr mA n 61erFolia rc$rl ot otr nCghbor lhr Town d vrll hi ur|d Vlols Condrucrlon ina in bctinn JlmYrn mriniltil lt trOllLfi hcd rrputdlon whldr rhoulrl mldgete concorfit dufug thc construoiotlpf'lod.
! vrr nqtficd.tlet lht numb€r |I|d ff€a of thc al$,lhhtr st the eouh .fo,rtl6a b. r|drFed Wehrw oornp$rd u,{fi tht Gqufr.
JLJN A1 '94 E4I57PI'I NE','-5-CONTROLLERS P,3
It wne rcgurncd ftd th. hont doer br reh€d to €ddng greE € larel Wo hq\re r|bBd trc tront dooi
to eddrg grede rnrt ha\r€ rnoved I to a rmn di$rEBt locdbn m [l0 ssst stds d tle bulldlng,
h vr rogu.Cilt tld wf we roetlab glmlls| to t|19'e ulsdqg. wb ara urhg a !rlo* odador tl'nller
to fF ad*ing Jd d.n to mdch the colorgtbn ol lhr $dsdng bdEl( Wr trc Ptnnhg tO malon thg
cadt d1*.t on the rdlacert roof, Wc sn ptanniE to ure woorl de*hg m f€ edsrhf dccks b
maoh $lc addng. wr aro uslng aa|em€nl ryP3 vrlndol||| wm 6ivi{lod $ctlonr $mihr to thocr nsxt
dq.
n mr 3ugEsdad thel moru wood bs Ehoun 0n the bulldng cnd whdowe We han ftn$d tt€
fim rnd lrtlll ffirund ths whdowr to lldwood. lt wrE rEguenod t0 reducr $3 totd qu$c fEdrga 0f
glrs m fia aouh hcda. We han nduced ha totel glalr sse on the aornh rEc to rpfodmdely
mddr fic drdng ar:a,
w. wslu rquadd to rEmoyr sny Eh* rell€f dt the Udldlrlg fid hsr/a Oona tO
Wr hrw l€ft th3 b|.h mclozurer In thElr cunrn loottloq enhough Unl 7 h3r no hgal c|tgltert to
laa 0roilr
Thr bl| bs.E lhl lur bsen niled b th. all bdck souh ft0ad6 $d th3 cun wer the whdorve Thir
h nd fte fr.t d..lgrr ard conuualon p|oi6ct wc har. ufid$leftotl' We c8n vis{ralkc whd we erc
propofigt Wo hold enginooilng rnd rrchlbclun degroor lrcm M.lL We bo|lan our renordon b
compatlble u,ttt rr. qhkrg 1i€n3 Tl'$rnhousce our lnteilbfl It not to chan$ tho chEndsf or apltil
d trn rsigFsodrood, hr to cfeEtr a ta*efultadfilonal high rydlty unlr we h$rf coffidanoe in Lym
Frilzlrn {|d thr itrecflwn!|t of htr 6e8ign h rE$iling tho frcs.lal d 0ta ChH Bdrthg Texat
lbwnho.nt, tso cf sfiiclr m el bdofq then appean lo ba r ri,lde tol.rarsi h lndlrHusl qpres$hn.
wb rcdd fhf to bs gi,tn r|s 8em! l8trib[ny h deyolopino our unil.
w. bdils wt hrvl gpne to coruidsNble enon tl|d o.p6nl3 l0 b0 l€3pomlys F he ooflcgnr of g
mrl gru.p d 0|.r n€lghbofir W. do ncl bellevr nt DRB he3 |'|y bt'b to diny or rbb orr
ryplcOsrl Wf would ?Pffcirc your poEitlvf nspol|3. t0 0u epdlcdon il t$ t&n€.ffiF
n
brn rLU**a'*" ,**'a
t< 4- t-)/JlS-n-/at - /-< oz-<:ztzt -
)-t-y'o o-Jf e-L!:-*.-d- :ha,.4,-h lL S faw'it y'*a.dzt
/ Oe B ,i aurr?o,- -p't -t^2 o'u tz/da-cnz--*4 -/7 79-ry-, *@ t''
r' tk/ir' ?f f- t'--- -/--.u .t,o-i..t.+.t Li-:.7, r:;aj 3,9frngr5A' LB,
J,,lQO€q ?A A"- <i"u q'<"o'- I
2J t ,/;. t -. c / t' /at pa,8,tt--ak'.tt/ /pi:a.E *t e ftO ry?e,.:fu<-e *l r'el-.d!
- t.a. fu- d a4', ", ct- r*.o-b-
3. F7 d Q !j>; ",,a,2 o.-* (-o'*, *o O2t).-i z4c=z:)
+ 7r'-,,7".,-l or'.,, /)anuv ,./a-J-l*..* d+,.'t o1*u
AAz
'%z='.-.-arJ o.-iut ?-/r-a) z,n-c[,o,/t/l .,.' -I
5 et*^/a"/, { */* qP44714t-Ea/J *r.-& 'la'a-C-a^.at 42 -?4t
C-*4/144/4-,tJ - Tzta-p-o>ad.-- -u7-..aa-/ 2t--€.-/ 4Lt
4 v",?,:y,
'lhog q^o L* :'
tJ.*w
V\t-,.,;.-g
\,
d-t--.--c> '7-F.o--.-
,lI t).
a),-,ehuz
, trnl fu*'Ac"u^s,/r'"Jt zu u'uad Lr^L
er/*tt/r*,--*":n J;
cM7d-+*t .- - fa,,-t--,f -/*t
a^.dz.utcill
Z-
.1a
a-cc-€.ta)/o ,o---,---J a,:-zzz) fr,.a2..-Je.,-;-L /A. Z
-L *.,;L{ iL"bH.
q nu d-et*. .1 d-*-oo o2' --Lt-r-o,=42-q, i1 o.^24) -.2..r-t - --"11 .=Acut ,'4 ""r>Iu
lnuc^,--J':a-/ j4'\-&fa-2r4 -t-'a,t-<-t,--tf' t',2.--e)^&.- nO)J*-..Lt4;U
5- -f.'.7"/ t"..t1g.e,'-T i<Oi *..-t z.a c A., ^--.,i -1..- 24"/t-z-..a-.,"1,-: z<, -,c-<-:2-,
qD /-*J-n rfli { 791gg cL'ci ,z,','r-t-/-.a"*-,*iia;ir--Jl
a,aa, j", J ua.fl a,4/;-J -l-..-J",, *---" d
^zla-t4- Q { /U n-coe^,f 7{ ?
6 do).z-Ld- nu.reta3 { /* 7dS /vefz,'--*!z --*-r}--,,,/oJ-/./:-,
-/u"' cuo-t!- 7 naot o. ealA "--d - I t*"t4 *r".1) a',^e)
7 Anu: or.tl *c-e'.^-H -l* Lh,til'dr/\-"-:4- da'..f^-f 2
.u..,c2,' d.-zc*L -*.2/- clin-L 'gr/-au)u" I .pU ^"t *i.f">ft^.fi
V. d.zcL /*"."J" ---e*.**2/ h--,.o*zj: AJc-h),"-*,4-/"/'1 7f"A)'
7---rp^th"e--tu /.,. 7 i^tL ?o,2 /-,./-4-c-/r--+ *-%,'u^)
:
]r.r7e;fl J,-.("?.t.,),-,rn".* A'ar-n )-rn* *ti/':fu*'
,d.f o/t A b*+"1 L*n.L - -*r /;--,-P;x{ /
oo
? + czyik-.,.;,+-Lo-)* ad/zz.^.:
.-.6'tc[ J n - .J-,n-^'7 :ry..azup.e? 2t'r L44t+@-
drL-,4^+a ;<a.&&-r:av ,i/f,A 4' /**ry{bd /",,.,-f ?Chtoil*e" 4 *t* *l-; ,tiloa^, o-',6o-l-6 *1t22o.-,r.n&
urrldl,azz.s *rt le--J4";'67** -lmlfu '6 v^24 ;"at' er :t'/-
aLChL4)
'2tr;9t2.,,/- { ./ >- i u
-/arj' 4 "-!4
ou'l-ott-ZLj -L,taaD r?-,-L.*"qa
4n #z-,*A br'-ct/
n Atd.//r/tJ U*D -Lr--!, ,j*r-*>a,w a*Aat/z:
E ":"-ll,t -,n-o.)l-r,- ft7 a-,a, \/;;L ut=r^4p^A o po,fu-
-,^^ir. p"nt. ,p-1 J^-? W "f +-t D.Fa-<aJ
)J8d Ar,e/ ***: A*/.^."4 cca*,^ezLu/e"'a/' p/z-fu^,,
+ uzt tdar-l 1)+i,v
a.
'F,
l:'
I
Barr-,Bv, llannnvc & Pprpnsox
A PRoFESSIoNAL ConpoRrrror.t
ATToRNEYSATLAw
LINCOIN CENTER
IO60 LINCOIJ{ STREET SUITE 8176
DENVER. COLORADO 80284
TETEPHONE (S09) 83?.r860
FACSIMILE (803) 88?-0097
May 23, 1994
Mr. Jiro Curnutte
Town of Vail Planner
Town of VaiL
75 S. Frontage Road WestVail, Colorado 81657
RE! I,ot 8, The Rowhouses
Dear Jim:
on instructions from Helen Chatfield, who is an adjacent property owner
of Lot 8, The Rowhouses, she hereby appeals the Staff interpretation ofall iterns set forth in your le€ter of May 13, L994 regarding the
expansion and alteration to Lot 8, The Rowhouses.
ff you have any questions please contact rne at ny office.
Sincerely,
terson
VAIL NATIONAL BANK BLDG.
IO8 SOUIH FRONTACE ROAD WEST, SUITE 80?
VAIL COLORADO 81667
TELEPHONE (SO3l 47 A-OO92
FACSIMIIJ (909) a?9.0{8?
t
!
!
w-L7-L994 @:53F['l cllt{t 6
,r I
L fo'
3700 East
Dcilv€tr,
(3O3)
SuilE
il
It&iIIm Crmfri, Pleuertr
ToilniofVdl :
ZSbuftnmilr83Roodwest t
Vait, CO 8165? ' I rli
Mn Cumuttt: i I -- B"yFar: 13g;).4794,157 l
, , I rt;i rrpo wec+ ago, my rvtfdmd I r$endcd the nccdng of ttrc D6igF npviE
ttDfcr6ufiqg boq oirrclw ad theTerrs Toqmhousq A*sosiatforo of rvlrich I s'n
Tb& fu in rcfaeobe b ths drnnorl rernodclins (u rcobnrlnadonl of thThain rctt[&is n lcf,tcoilco ftsdrnnodrprnodcline (q ndrurnrcUonl of tuThain
TE*afbrmhou+(463 Es$corcCr€E&Ihiw), i':lll
AI dr"t {{r, * stt€rt crrnffiatcfficcflrs dtUorritepuneA rioOg
btil dditim and cm*ucrion of e nssr homo.not h r'ndqg wlth tltc tradidon
of F Ttxas Twbhurses. SpeA*aUy, xE cmted m romio te exlsdaC frnade cbdhhS; rc d4 sot lhinrr tle Dcw brick cxuior w8s in t&ffilrng wifh tla Cmple
ttcc*bec u ttr; riro yrctt conceaned aDout thgry;w Autt dod s; itl *cp*down
notl&lnt tbc rcwlof skylighB along rhe frmt of the rmf matc.M other rmft; tlur,rlu.r"r r|.F rufwr l,r qyuS||rl atr[g ulc Inxll o] mB Ilxtf IIEEIEo oulgr xtll,
scchod oil gf ecd! with tlnt of tbo otlrs writq urd *e wr gcnerafly conm
prtdrrrntm of ilio lsrdEcaling. In gooual, we ftel tho remodeled urdr should
othir rrn{fs witbirt tho tuildiDg, rrcognidag ftat ech ls difrcrent
thrt u,F ru aot drd rrtat ms dure'widdn Sc na[s of tncnx*i.nce hil sdngly
17,lgln
i *Gdrd
vidows i
Bbout thoi
to tuc
Wc,
H
. qthcsowFngoftheTqrsTbvrnhousr+tohavevoinedtheirsinihooade,uioeftOr'
wlillam & l,lry lscpna (#4A), Johu & Bortara woodhull (#48), Joh a aonn4 stnun! .
(t5A), Als & fioalca mcCormicr (#68), EetEn frtE*t t r/Bi rnd loho mO {trnmDoawaa(fl[r., , i :
, Plcso rl*ryhtct orn cdncemr at 60 DcsiEr Rc\dc{u Bohd firccdag on tUt :tg.wltlberrnabhbbn€od. i i
I
I
i
.i
I
I
I
I
I
RibD, Woottsn
TOTH- P.El
Ar \
Helen H. Chatfield
Texas Townhouse #78
483 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, C0 81658
May .|8, .|994
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Town of Vai'l , Plannjng DepartmentVail, C0 81658
Renovat'ion of Texas Townhouse #8A and #88 by Carmen and John Thain
Dear Mr. Curnutte:
I am writing you at this time to express my concern over the proposed
changes (demolition/renovation) to Texas Townhouses #8A and #8B.
As the owner of Texas Townhouse #78 since .1978 and one who has enjoyed
spending time in Vajl since 1965, I have severql concerns I would ljke to
address with regard to the Thain residence noqbeing proposed to take the
pl ace of Biddy and Tom 0'Dwyer's former Texas'Townhouse units #8A and #8B.
The main issues with which I am concerned are: l) the fire escape, 2) the
location of the trash containers and 3) the overall appearance of the exterior
structure and its 'lack of conformity with the other seven townhouses with
respect to the windows, the brick versus a partial brick and partial wood
exterior, and the deck, stairway and ba'l cony rai'l ing materials.
The fire escape is located on the balcony in back of my condominium,
half on my property and half on the property of unit #88. It is a steel
spiral staircase which has been there as long as I have owned Townhouse #78.It is essential to me and to visitors who stay there, including renters
who rent the condominium through Vail Home Rentals in the winter as well
as in the summer. l,lithout this spiral staircase'i n the back of the building,
there would be no way out of the condominium should the front of the building
be on fire and the front stairvay be unauailable for escape.
The area that contains the enclosures for the garbage cans for units
#74, #78, #8A and #88 has always been located on the east side of the deck
on Townhouse #8A. This has a'lways been a convenient and out-of-the-way
locatjon for garbage cans and serves to eliminate the need for unsightly
garbage cans or dumpsters in front of the buildjng.
It is of great concern to me that the proposed exterior appearance of
units 8A and 88 will not be harmonious with the other seven townhouses.
An all-brick exterior is of great concern when the rest of the townhouses'
exteriors are of wood or a combination of brick and wood. In addition,
the large size of the proposed windows and the quantity of windows and
surrounding ornamental brickwork is not consistent with the appearance
f r, \
Page 2
of the windows on the other townhouses. I am also concerned over the
pFoposed b'lack wrought-iron railing with alternate tt,,isting columns to
be used on the deck, the exterior staircase and the proposed ba'lcony. Most
buildinEs in the neighborhood have balconies with railings made of uood rather
than iron and which b'lend in with the environment w'ith regard to material(i;e. wood) and color.
I hope that you as a Planner: for the Town of Vail will take these
things into conslderation and pass this letter on to the members of the
Design Review Board. I will be in attendance at the meeting on llednesdayif you have any further questions.
ResPectful lY submi tted'
fu/,r,.^wJ, 4"4*tz--
He]en H. Chatfietd
Ou,nern Texas Townhouse #7B
cC: Diana Donovan
Rike tlootten
Jay Peterson
FILE COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
Departnent of Community Developtnent
May 13, 1994
Lynn FriElen
FriElen, Pierce, Briner
P.O. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Proposed remodel of the Thain residence, Lots 8A, 88 and 9, Texas Townhomes, Vail
Village 4th Filing.
Dear Lynn:
This letter is intended to document the discussion which took place during our meeting
yesterday, Wednesday May 11, 1994, concerning the above-referenced remodel. I hope this
letter will be helpful in clarifying many of the issues raised by yourself, the Thain's legal
counsel, and Jay Pelerson, counsel for Helen Chatfield. I have broken out each of the major
issues related to the proposed Thain residence remodel and have listed them as follows:
1. The Thain property is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is nonconforming
with regard to minimum lot size, setbacks, GRFA, etc. lt is considered to be a
legally nonconforming building. Staff agrees with your interpretation of the
nonconforming section of the Vail Municipal Code which would allow the Thains
to remove a substantial portion of the building and build an entirely new building
provided the existing nonconformity is not increased. As you have discussed
previously with Mike Mollica, the mass and bulk of the building (i.e. building
footprints, height, setbacks, and GRFA - excluding the 250 Ordinance addition)
cannot be increased in any way. The proposed stairs on the rear of the
building, as presenled at conceptual Design Review Board (DRB) review, would
be considered a violation of the non-conforming section of the Code. Staff
believes that the rear access to the basement must be removed.
2. The proposed remodel of the Thain residence includes two additional 250
square foot applications. Section 18.71.030 H (AdditionalGross Residential
Floor Area) slates that any dwelling unit in a multi-family dwelling shall be
eligible for additional GRFA not to exceed a maximum of 250 square feet in
addition to the existing GRFA for the site provided that no exlerior additions or
alterations to multi-family dwellings, with the exception of window skylights or
other similar modifications, shall be allowed. The Thains are proposing to
utilize two 250 ordinances for the two dwelling units within the exisling shell of
the building and construct a basement when the new building is constructed.
Therefore. the GRFA attribuled to the two 250's shall not alter the exterior of
the dwelling units. Since the 250 section of the Code does not allow for lhe
pooling of additional GRFA, it is important that each 250 square foot addition be
directly attributed lo each dwelling unit.
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Two
3.Staff does not believe that the building will become more nonconforming with
the addition ol the proposed 250 applications. The 250 section of the Vail
Municipal Code does allow for the addition ol 250 square feet of GRFA per unit
in addition to the existing GRFA on a property even if the existing GRFA on the
property already exceeds the allowable. This provision applies to allproperties
throughout town and is not specific to lhe Thain residence or the Texas
Townhomes.
Additionally, staff agrees with your contention that the existing perimeter line of
the building establishes the legal extent of the setback nonconformi$. Existing
and new GRFA (250 additions) may be rearranged within the shellof the
existing building, and underground, as long as the perimeter lines are not
exceeded. Aly above grade expansion of the building which would extend
beyond the perimeter line established by the existing buibing walls, or break
the plane of the existing roof or chimney lines would require variances from the
nonconforming and setback sections of the Town Code. Below grade
expansions are permitted provided they do not extend beyond the perimeter
lines established by the existing building footprint. Variances would be required
for below grade expansions which were proposed to extend beyond the
established building fooPrint.
Staff does not agree with Jay Peterson's interpretiation that the Thain units
should fall into the single family dwelling and two family dwelling category
described in Section 18.71.020 of the Vail Municipal Gode. We believe that the
Thain residence must comply with the Multi-Family Dwelling criteria outlined in
Section 18.71.030. Section 18.04.090 of the Vail Municipal Code defines multi-
family dwellings as:
"A building containing three or more dwelling units, including
townhouses, rowhouses, apartrnents, and condominium units,
designed for or used by lhree or more families, each living as an
independent housekeeping unit."
Section 17.08.240 defines a townhouse as:
"A building that has one family dwelling units erected in a row or
in a cluslered fashion as a single building on adjoining lots, each
being separate from the adjoining unit or units by a party wall or
walls extending from the basement floor to the roof along the
dividing lot line, and each such building being separate from any
other building by space on all sides."
4.
,4
Ms. Fritzlen
May 13, 1994
Page Three
Glearly, the Texas Townhomes building meets the definition of a townhouse
building and is therefore considered to be a multi-family building, as it relates to
detErmination of the unit type category described in the additional 250 section
of the Gode.
As you know, in order to apply lor a 250, evidence must be provided that the
unit or units have received a final Certificate of Occupancy. During our last
meeting, you requested that staff review the Town files to determine whether or
not a final Certificate of Oocupancy has ever been granted lor Units 8A or 88 at
the Texas Townhomes. Staff is unabte to locate any record ol a final Certilicate
ol Occupancy being issued for either of the units. Therefore, in order to
proceed with your 250 application, you must request that the building
department perform a final Certificate of Occupancy inspection on the Thain
units and provide a copy of the certificates to the planning staff.
Also mentioned during our conversation on Wednesday, please provide a copy
of Association approval to temporarily remove the existing landscape amenities
(grass, rocks, etc.) currently existing on the Association property, located
directly in lront ol Lots 8 and 9. Please address how you intend to landscape
this area atler ths construction on your landscape plan.
I believe the above information accurately describes our conversation on Wednesday May 11,
1994. However, if you are not in agreement with any of the informalion contained in this
letter, please contact me immediately to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,bM
Jim Gurnutte
Town Planner
xc: Tom Moorhead
lffstan PriE
Rick Rosen
Mark Smith
Mike Mollica
Jay Peterson
5.
6.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tom Moorhead
Jim Curnutte (.C
April28, 1994
Texas Townhomes tear down/rebuild
Lynn Fritzlen has recently submitted an application lo tear down two units (Units 8A and 8B)
and rebuitO a unit at the Texas Townhomes. This tear down/rebuild includes two additional
250 square foot applications. As you know, 250 square foot additions cannot result in any
exterior change in a multFfamily structure. Therefore, the applicant is proposing to utilize the
500 additional square feet as a new basement when the new building is constructed. The
applicant intends to match the mass and bulk ot the existing building exacfly, including all wall
locations and roof elevations. The applicant has submitted documents to show that they do
not need homeowner's association approval for the proposed tear down/rebuild.
This propefi is zoned High Density Multi-Family and is nonconforming with regard to
minirirum loisize, setbacks, etc. lt is considered to be a legally nonconforming building. Staff
has interpreted the nonconforming section of the Code such that the applicant may tear down
the existing building and build an entirely new building provided the nonconformity is not
increased.
Tom, would you please review the attached documents and let me know whether you. concur
that homeowner association approval is not required in conjunction with this proposed
remodel. Secondly, please give us your interpretalion on whether or not you agree that the
applicant may teai dirwn an existing slructure, build a new building, and utilize two 250 square
tddt aOOitond provided the mass and bulk ol the new building exactly matches the previous
structure.
Late breaking news...Jay Peterson, representing Diana Donovan, who owns the adjacent
property, jusiwalked in with a copy ol a party wall agreement between Units 7 and 8. He
bontenOs tnat this application cannot proceed further without Diana's permission' However,
on Page 2, if says that me party wall may not be 'altered, removed or destroyed.' What if the
applicint claims that the wall will not be altered, removed or destroyed? Please advise'
rt
o
WILLIAM B. SEMMER
I.JNCOI.NSHIRT, ILLIIIOIA O{XX|E
April 25. 1994
Mr. Jim Curnette
Planner-Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Curnette:
This letter is being written to express serious concern with respect to the
proposed renovation of Unit 8 8t the Texas Townhouses.
My primary concern is the dramatic change to the exterior €l€vations of Unit 8,
particularly the front (south) elevation. lf this plan is approved, the appearance
of Unit 8 would be out of character with the other units in our building, which
are quaint, tasteful and unobtrusive. None of the existing units have a ground
level entry and none have four stories of living area'
Other concerns I have deal with the removal of existing landscaping, pot€ntial
damage to the foundation of our building and the substantial increase in square
footage of Unit 8.
As a Texas Townhouse property owner, I am always glad to see tasteful
renovations tak€ place in neighboring units. However, I would like to see that
those renovations be confined to existing living areas. Furthermore' renovations
should not change exterior elevations, they should not dramatically increase
square footage and should be executed in a way that will not harm existing
landscaping.
Thank you for your time and consideration,
Sincerely,.It tn^
It4 L( /K ll)J/--(---y r v'}v \
William B. Semmer
Owner- - Unit 4A
Texas Townhouses
APR ? I 1gg{firF
i()\j .(]OMt\lI. DTV. DEPT'
Alexander MacCormick
160 East 72nd Street
New York, NY,l0021 -4634
5/5/94
Dear Diana,
Many thanks for your letter of April 19th,l 994. This reached me in
Europe so I have just now been able to reply.( returned home to NY May
4th.)
I am not in favor of any alteration to the outside of the Texas
Townhouses. I thought that this was not allowed by the rules of our
Association unless there was common consent. Pete Peny put this in
didn't he ? lt is also my understanding that any alteration to the backside,
ie the side facing the river,was covered by this ruling but alterations here
would normally be allowed.
Can Rike Wooten check this?We could even call Pete Perry in Denver too .
I agree with you that inconvenience to the other unit holders should be
kept to a minimum during a remodeling and that the original integrity of
the Texas Townhouse look should be maintained.
I talked to Rod Slifer before 8AB was sold and he thought that any buyer
would not be able to alter the outside in any way but they could probably
get permission to alter the attic if they did not increase the square
footage .Thus, I think that the new owners must have been aware that they
would face restrictions.lt seems that they are asking for the moon . Lets
hope they cannot have it .
All the best for now and many thanks for keeping us in formed.
AA/UJA
IIj\'ry
/'
-a'
'R[t]'D t''.AI 3 '1994
BAnROU HANIDr, M$WHINNEY & STRAUSS, INC.
200 cRrscEM couRt lgmt IL00R DALJI\S, ruxAs 7520l . 214{7l.tit00
April 28, L994
Town of Vailc/o Diana Donovan
1014 Home Stake Circle
Vail , Colorado 81657
To Whon it May Concern:
In our judgment the architectural drawings for the total revigion
of unit 8 -of Texas Townhouse are incompatible with the integral
concept of thig structure. As owneis of 5A we op-pose the
aesthitic destruction of the exterior of thig building as
originally intended and conetructed 30 years ago. Vte appeal lothe- town of Vail to deny approval of aII plans to alter the
exterior roof design and line; to change the front entry, to add
storieg or to remove mature landscape.
The unigue architectural integrity of Texas Townhouge must be
maintainld aB it contributes to Ltre charm and alIure of Vail
Village as well as to ite va1ue. Please help us- and-our
neighbors to preserve our existing mountain home. We have been
,r"rf impresee-d with the definitive stand Vail officials have
taken to protect Vail's distinctive environment.
If there is anything else we can contribute to help defeat the
proposed constructioh alteratione of Texas Townhouse pleaee let
us know. Thank you for your work.""m"ffi^
p,;t P 9A",*'\
ITWESIIIENTADVISARS
JAJTTES P.BARBOW
BRYAMM.HANIJY,JR
MICHAET C.IMWHINNEY
JOH}ILSTMUSS
RICHARDA" ENGI"ANDER
0H0LE,I.CONIIIN
PEItsRF. BRIDGE
DAVIDRHARDIN
STEPIIEN M. MIIIINO
JOHN S. VIII.JAIIS
Bonnie P. Strauss
Barr-,pv, Ilannnvc & PnrgRsoN
A PRoFESSIoNAL Conpone'rroN
ATToRNEYS AT [.,Aw
LINCOLN CENTER
1660 LINCOTN STREET. SUITE 3176
DENVER" COLORADO 80264
TELEPHONE (303) 837.1660
FACSIMILE (903) 83?.0097
VAIL NATIONAL BANK BLDG.
108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST, SUITE
VAIL, COLORADO 81667
TELEPHONE (S03) 470-0092
FACSIMILE (308) 470.0487
May 23, L994
Mr. Jirn curnutte
Town of Vail Planner
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road West
Vail , Colorado 8L657
RE: Lot 8, The Rowhouses
Dear Jim:
On instructions from Helen Chatfield, who is an adjacent property oltner
of Lot 8, The Rowhouses. she hereby appeals the Staff interpretation of
all items set forth in your letter of May 13, L994 regarding the
expansion and alteration to Lot 8, The Rowhouses.
If you have any questions please contact me at ny office.
Sincerely,
terson
OrntaenPlercegrln0
ARCI{ I TEC TURE PI.ANN IN€ II.ITERI ORS
I.ETTER OF SRAIISUTTTAI,
To:.a
nEC'D ilAY 5 1994.
Date!
Job No. 7418
Re. nz$
Attnr Jlfn 1r;rZr.lEFfE-
Attached Please Flnd:
f Yrogress Prints _ SpecificationsPlans _ Shop Drawings
- Other
ften No. No. of Copies Description
The items listed
1,Eor Review andr' As Requested
above are:
Corunent y' For Your
- Returned
UseAfter RevLew_ Other
Reuarks:
Page I
TRANSOOO . DOC
z'her4t tr 4 ,.<'rq , ar^rrl , .r- .I- ( vrl^ ru fiLll^ T , '-Btt- 21 ,1114.
| 000 Lr0NsRtD6E L00p . vAtL c0t_0RAD0 E | 658
Coples to:
POST OFFICE BOX 57 ;lE nrn q rc.Ir 'lmI|ta.t riat 303 476 6342 FAX 30J 476 49ol
o
Jru cltRlrurrts-zotrrxc--9419
1.) WHERE rS SITE PLAN/r,AI{DSCAPE/(DRATNAGE) cRADrNc
PIJAII?
RESUBUTTTED 5/3/94
2.) HO!{ UANY FIREPLACES ARE THERE NOW, At{D WHAT IS pRO-
POSED?
2 WooDBURNING EXISTTNG (TO BE RE!{OVED) 1 cAS PROPOSED
3. ) NORTH ELEVATTON SHOtfS EXTSTTNG STArR AltD BALCONY
RAIIJ ON LOT 7, BIIT SURVEY SHOITS IT ON pROpERTy L,INE AND
EXISTING NORTH EIJEVATION SHOtgS IT ALL ON LOT 8.
REFER TO 513/94 EI.EVATION
4.) NORTII EIJEVATION DOES NOT MATCH FLOOR PLANS.
REPER TO 5/3/94
5.) STATRS ON BASEUENT TJEVEL DON'T }iATCH 1ST tE\rEL.
REFER rO 5/3/94 PrAr{S
5.) SITE PLAI{ SHOULD UATCH ALIJ RIDGE AND EA\IE ELEVATIONS
AS EXTST. (pUT SPOT ELEVATTON OF NEW BUTLDTNG ON SrTE
Pr.AN).
DONE - RETER TO 5/3/94 SECTTONS
7. ) DIEED \TERIFICATION THAT BUILDING IIAS RECEI\IED FII{AL,c.o. (1953).
NO BUIIJDING OFFICIAT EXTSTED IN 1953
8.) I{EED COPIES OF THREE DOCIJIIiENTS IN TITLE REPORT.
9 . ) ADDRESS PUBLIC WORKS COMI'IENTS,
PEDESTRIAII AI,I.,EY - LOWER DECK TS NOlf PROPOSED TO BE RE-
UOVED
10. ) GrvE ME EXISTTNG Er_,EVATTON AT SAME SCAr_,E AS pRO-
POSED SO THAB I CAIT OVERIJAY.
1/4' PI.AT{S oF ExIsT. SI'B!,TITTED
11. ) NEED PIIOTOS OF EXISTTNG BUTLDTNG.
Page I
zoNE. DOC
03-l'lay-94
12.) RBIIOVE STATRS AND DECK ON T.O.V. pROpERTy.
STAIRS & LOWBR DECK TO BE REUOVED
13.) WHO OI{NS THE OTHER HALF OF THE TRIAT{GLE?
}'A}IOR VAIL . ACCESS BASE!,IENT EXISTS COPY SUBIIITTED AT4/30/94 UEETING
14.) NEED CONSTRUCTTON STAGING pr,Ar{.
REFER lO 5/3/94 SUBIIITTAIJ
15.) DOES THE ADDTTTONATJ GRFA TNCREASE pARKrNc?
NO
16.) wrNDOrs srrLs cANNoT sTrcK oln.
WE WOI'LD IIKE TO DISCUSS TIIIS AITD REVIEW
17 . ) EXISEING SITE pIJAt{ IS BIJOT{N Up Al{D NOT TO SCAIE.
RESUB}TITTED 5/3194. L/8" SCAI..E SHOI{N
18.) REUOVE WORD STORAGE FROM CRATVL SPACE IN EHE BASE-
IIENT.
O REFER ro s/3/g4 pr.,ANs
Page 2
zoNE.DOC
03-uay-94
19. ) WIrAT rS VOID AREA rN BASEITENT BE:IIVEEN ttNrTS?
BACKFII,L FOR FOI'NDATION
20.) wr{ERB IS ACCESS TO THE TWO CRATtr. SPACES rN THE
BASE}IENT?
REFER TO 5/3/94 PI.A}IS
21.) wHy DoN'T THE WAr.,L IJINE Up BETWEEN LEVELS?
REFER TO 5/3/94 PIJANS
22.) CURRENTLY TTTERE rS AppROxMATELy 20 SQUARE FEET OF
GRFA ON LOT g.-LYNN IS PROPOSING TO INCREASE GR'PA Olt LOI9 TO 30 OR 40 SQUARE FEET.
I{E THINK THE GRFA IS TIIE SAUE. NEEDS DISCUSSION.
E4€'T Ltz'/qrrol
// - 5te,r
,(-- 6t-6't/ (couni'f,
"t-,
n ,;kaeTH a-E /
,'-> - Et-t ll
patzT// € ct'/
,aPte. ,"d ot t,' ,2t/ rc c
T, /L/Ltf/'6
fiPz',t,t6,t47-
IrF=|=i
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board will be reviewing the following
application on May 18, 1994 in the Town ol Vail Municipal Building.
1. A request for two 250 square foot applications for additional of Gross Residential Floor
Area for the Thain Residence located at 483 Vail Valley Drive/Lots 8A, 88, and 9, Vail
Village 4th Filing.
Applicants: John and Carmen Thain
The applications and information about the proposals are available in the zoning
administrator's office during regular office hours for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
ooMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..._.0 r ^ ,
g D) la le+ -Qocurrs err G-lrtl lu
subJecr property: o Hdt' bt Lir*d 9:^ wif viltfa8A' Fourth Fi.I-ing, VaiJ. Colorado
North Property : Tract A, Vail Village (Gore Creek)
Ovner: Town of Vail
South Property3 Gore Creek Drive R.O.vl.
Owner : lexag Townhouge Agsociation. Rike Whooten Pregident
3700 E. Alaneda Avenue S-500
Denver Colorado 80209
EaEt Property: Manor Vail
Ovner: lfanor Vail Condominium Association
595 Vail Valley DriveVail Colorado 81558
WeEt Propertys Unl-ts 7A and 78
Owner Unit 7A: Diana Donovan
1014 Honestake CircleVaiI Colorado 81557
Otrrner Unlt 7Bt Helen Chatfield
540 S. Franklin St.
Denver Colorado 80209
4lJ'llq4- Q{rcr-nrs sLrr o=a-j- € tq
Pg. I
address.doc
posToFFlcE Box 57 1000 LtoNSRtDGE LOOP VATLCOLORADO 81658 3034766342 FAx3034764901
*icr l|mlrr ia. D|A linllx *lc€ Lr$
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS IIEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board will be reviewing the following
application on ilay 18, 1994 in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
1. A request for an additional 250 square feet of Gross Residential Floor Area for the
Thain Residence located at 483 Vail Valley Drive/Lots 8A, 8B, and 9, Vail Village 4th
Filing.
Applicants: John and Carmen Thain
The applications and information about the proposals are avaihble in the zoning
administrator's office during regular office hours for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Published in the VailTrailon April29, 1994.