The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAIL VILLAGE WEST FILING 2 LOT 46 LEGALo Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Oornmunity Devdopment 75 Sotrth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 tax: 97 0.479.2452 web: www,d.yail.co.us Projectilame: DANTASCHANGE DRBNumber: DR8050278 Project Descrlption: FINAL APPROVAL TO CHANGE TO THE APPROVED PI.ANS FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Paftldpants: owNER DA],|TAS, MICFTAEL Wlt6l2005 PO BOX 4015 AVON co 81620 AppucANT DANTAS, MICHAEL 061t612005 PO BOX,1015 AVON co 81620 Project Address: 1936 W GORE CREEK DR VAIL Locauon: 1936 WEST GORE CREEK DRIVE Legal Description: l'ot: ,16 Block Subdivislon: Strauss SuMivision Parcel Number: 2103-123-0702-8 Comments: Appro,ed per plans submitted BOARD/STAFF ACTTOI{ Motion By: Hanlon Action: APPROVED S€cond By: Dunning Vote: 5-0 DateofApproval: 05/15/2005 Gonditions: Cond:8 (PIAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. @nd:202 Apprwal of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Pald: $2O.OO Yn z V;tttre l*ut 3' tJr 4+ I ".I O Uinor Exterior Alterat}s Application for Design Review Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2128 taxt 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design reviorv must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. please refer to the submittal requiremenb for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required informaUon is received by the Community Dwelopment Department, The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission, llesign rcview approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. of the Request:?au4 Location of the ProposaE tott {L Abck:- SuMivision: Physical Address:lv?u il 6rr< Cre< ( /t;uz Parcel No.: V63- E3 - O?O?'&n tuaEag6 co. Assessor at 970-328-q640 for parcet no.) Zoning /* iz.or/a u -5,n Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address:or /oz5 6y'2, C:O 7/o 7L. - Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant:il/,kz 1/asy'a o Mailing Address: E-mail Address:Fax: $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot oftotal sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an additon where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window addiUons, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re'roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Reviev 8oard. No Fee qw6' ao rJ \)s t/o tr X tr Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs tr Conceptual Review tr New Constructiontr Addition tr Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) Minor Alteration (singlefamily/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request ,. Staeernent Nrmber: Palment Method: o Itft*aaaaatlltlfafllll***lal'talaafaft*lfaa*f**+'l**+*ta*****++fffaaafafa+**tlaaffftf+*f+***+a TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statemeirt 6051/DANTAA BUIIJ'ERS Permit, No: DRBO5O2?8 Type: DRB- Chg to Appr P1ans iParcel No: 2lO3-!23-O702-A R050000868 Arnormts: $20.00 06/16/200502322Check Init: itS Notation: Site Addreee: 1935 W GORE CREEK DR VAIIr LocaEion: 1935 WEgf @RE CRAEK DRI\'E flria Payment:$20. oo ToEaI Feea : Tot,al AIJIJ PmUa : Bala.nce3 $20. oo 920.00 $o. oo ACCOI,JNT ITEM LIST: Account Code DR 00100003LL2200 ::::::*_':i DBSIG'}I R"E\':TEI| FEES 2O.OO o Protoct llme: DANIAS Nni/ SFR DRB ilumber: DRB(Xfl)4,| Pmfcct Dercrlfim: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Parddpante: OWNER DANIAS, MICHAEL 0?1212004 Phone: PO BOX,mfs AVON @ 81620 Ll,aense: APruCANT JARDIT PAULW. 0?1?20fi Phone: PO BOX 3320 AVON @ 81520r lJense: @ctAddrw: LoclUon: 1936 WESTGORE CREEK DRIVE lrgal Deaclpdon: Lo& 46 Blodc Subdlvldon: Strauss Subdivisbn Parel llumben 210312307028 Gommcnts Coneptual Rwlew Only l BOARD/SiIAFF ACTTOI{ AGIon: PLANC( Gondldmc: ffifrt r€vta^, ts Nfia DesBn Rodew Boant apprronl. Plrnncr: George Ruther Fttt coPr f,TBA]{( LOAN CENTER P.O. BOX .|515.|5 LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 60215 PHONE fl)l2:35'45(X) June 5, 2006 Town' d'f"ndll 75 s, Flontage Road Vai1, CO 81657 REr 839-1750 Michael R, Dantas To Whon It May concern: our records indicate the above referenced letEer of credit has expired fn order to process this file properly, please .return the original copy of the letter of credit in the enclosed postage paid envelope. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Loan Department at (303) 235-4500 or (800) 964-3444 outside the Denver MetroDolitan area. s incereLy. @Q-E-- * Dave Rogers Loan Assistant {':.,tf, /dex Encl-osure ( s ) J*,!-,Wtt*tr$,,"* Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 webr www.ci.vail.co.us ProjectName: DAIITASCHANGE DRBNumber: DRB0S0056 Project Description: WINDOW CHANGES TO A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Patticipants: OWNER DANTAS, MICHAEL 02/122005 Phone: PO BOX 4015 AVON co 81620 License: APPUCANT IARDIS, PAUL W. 02/122005 Phone: PO BOX 3320 AVON co 81620 License: CONTRACTOR DANTAS BUILDERT INC. 02ll7l2o0s Phone: (970) 376-s444 PO Box,1015 Avon, Colorado 81620 License: 290-A Project Address: 0 W GORE CREEK DR VAIL LocaUon: 1936 WEST GORE CREEK DRryE l.egal Descdption! ktt.{6 Block SubdMsion: Strauss Subdivision Parcel l{umben 210312307028 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Mouon By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By:Vote: DateofApprovalt 0212L12Q05 Conditions: Cond: I (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). &nd:0 (P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with . Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. ConO:ZOf, Apprwal of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year fullowing the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construcdon is ommenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0006942 A revised buildingpermit appiicaUon shall be submitted to the Cornmunity Devebpment Deparfnent for review and approval prior to the issuance of a T@. Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Paid: f2O.OO I \ TOI,iIAI O n4inor Exterior ,qtteraons Application for Design Review f)pn.e+rnpnr ni r-nmmr rnihr navFlnnmo.1i' 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teli 97 0.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479.2452 , web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All_ projects reguiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permii application. please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application ior Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by b.re Community Develcpment Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and conslruction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request: Location of the Propos at: Lor: /(2 Block:- Suoaivtsion: 94/44 5 4C Physical Adrrress: /?.2 f" 4 " 6Af-p--Cr.U L-- (Conlacl Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) 3Z Parcel No.: Zoning:/4, Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address:'o. o, Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of .Applicant: Mailing Address: 0o/4 C, E-mail Address: Type of Review and Feet D Signs D Conceptual Review D New Constructiontr Addition n Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) tr l'4inor Alteration (single-family/duplex) E Changes to Approved Plans O Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 pef square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior converstons). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildinEs and site improvemenls, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already Qesign Review 6oard. No Fee Page 1 of 72l04lZUA4 approved by Planning Staff or the **fal'itltttlfllll'}llllltll''t*t*f*+{''}*l'}l'ttfffflia'lf'l+f*'t*****a'}'}*a'}a!t!t*'}*'}t**'}*tf*tla'lrtfitilf TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statcmcot l*tlt*ftltl*l**llflffttt*****l+**+***f**lft+tt*+**tf+*t*f't*****t**'}+**'it'ttttta'lff**ftaataalfl gtatem€nt Nunib€r: R050000142 Arnount: $20.00 02/t7/2OOSO8:14 Atd Pa)rmenq !{ethod: Cash Init: iIS tilotsation: $2o,/DAlgTAs BUIIJDBRS Petmlt No: DR8050056 Tlpe: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans Parcel No: 2L03L23O7028 91te AddreEa: O W @RE CREBK DR \TAIL IJocat.ion: 1936 YIEST GioRE CREEK DRrvB Total Feea: $20,00Thie Payment: S20-00 Total AIJIJ PrnUs: $20.00Balaoce: $0.00+*+afafl*laltalll*'}llllfltl*l*t***t*flllfa'}'}'}|}t*'}'}'}lta+t*t*t'lfltl+taaa**aafatafaaaaa*aaaaaaa ACCOI,JNT ITEM IJST: Account Code Description Current Pmts DR OO1OOOO3I122OO DESIGDI RSVXEI{ FEES 20.00 aYiry"tus,€r * ACTION FORM Departnent of Crmmunity Devdoprnent 75 Sorlth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479,2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www,ci.vail.co.us Proied Name: DANTAS VARIANCE PEC Number: PE@2t0018 Pmject Description: A reguest for a variance from 20olo site @verage to ertend an overhang across the entry stair on the west side of the lot currently under construction Partacipants: OWNER DANTAS, MICHAEL 03/19/2004 Phone: PO BOX 4015 AVON co 81620 License: APPUCANT MAURIELLO PLANNING GROUP, LL03/19/2004 Phone: PO BOX 4058 EDWARDS co 81532 Licensel Prciect Address: 0 W GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: 1936 WEST GORE CREEK DRIVE legol Descrlpdon: LoU.16 Block: Subdivision: Stmuss Subdivision Par€el Numben 2ilO3L23O7O28 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Mouon By! Action: WITHDRWN Seoond By:Vote: DateofApproval: Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Oond:300 PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel PEC Fee Paid: $500,00 ,,-t) Planning and Environmental Commission Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commission Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Cotorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us All .projects requiring Planning and Environmental commission review must receive approval prior to submitting abuilding permit application. Please refer to the submiftal requirements for the particulii approval that is requestid. An application for Planning and Environmental commission review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Design Review Board. Type of Application and Feel tr Conditional Use Permit! FloodDlainModification D Minor Exterior Alteration! lvlajor Exterior Alteration! Develooment PlanE Amendment to a Development Plan n,/ Zoning Code Amendment d Variance D Sign Variance $6s0 $400 $6s0 $800 $1s00 $2s0 $1300 $s00 $200 f\..9 General Information: tr Rezoning $1300D Major Subdivision 91500D Minor Subdivision $650tr Exemption Plat $650tr Minor Amendment to an SDD $1000tr New Special Development District $6000C Major Amendment to an SDD 96000tr Major Amendment to an SDD 91250 (no exterior mdiftcattons) Ilescription ofthe Request: Site Coveraqe Variance to allow covered entry (not livino area) in excess of 2070 lot coveraqe on a 9,931 so. ft. lot. Location of the Proposal: Lot: 46 Block;_ Subdivision: Vail Villaoe West Filino 2 Physical Address: 1936 West Gore Creek Drive Parcel No,l 210312307028 ( Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: P/S Two-Family Name(s) of Owner(s): Michael Dantas Mailing Address: PO Box 4015. Avon. CO 81620 Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: Represented bv Mauriello Planning Group. LLC Mailing Address: PO Box 4058, Edwards. CO 81632 Phone: 748-0920 E-maif Address:mauriello(Ocomcast. net Fax: 7 48-0377 RECEIVE D AUti 2 U iil,r. No.:Zt( b R.. Do.-t.^-, J-ts 'o U Dantas Site Coverage Variance f936 W. Gore CreekDrive AdJacent Property Owners List t HILGARTNER" CHARLES RIFE, m & STACY Al.lN -JT 1916 W GORE CREEKDR VAIL, CO 81657 t IRWIN,DAVIDL. PO BOX 3342 VAIL, CO 81658 t PTARMIGAN TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION C/O TOM SAAT.FELD 62 E. MEADOWDRTVE VAIL, CO 81657 t KNdVIEL, NEAL L. & KATHY R. -JT 456 COLI.'MBINE ST DENVE& CO 80206 t COLE, ELIZABETH J. . KURPI.JIS, DENNIS J. -JT PO BOX 6317 VAIL, CO 81657 t - pns'AMERICA* o*tfi rrrr tr..r1 I ' .118 Broedwrt p.O. Box l9E0 . F.rglc. CO 8t63I . phoac: (9zO) 32g.521I . pAX: (97O328_5224 COMMITMENT SCI!5DI'LE A coErLirnesC No! Esg 103 280 3 1. colcir$tot Drt€: Novetnber 13, 2OO3 aE ?:29 A.M. 2. Pollcy o! Policier to be is.rucd: policy t6oq6t (al onttcrr Folic1' - rrogosed Insurect: S 2LS,O0O.OO Michael R. Danlas (b) Loan policy - proDosed fnsurcd: S _ O _ NONE 3. F€e gilrple int,ereot in tshc land describcd in chis Conai rnenc Is ohed,, at th.cqEnri.trscnt oate by: Paul W. \ta!di3 4. Ttre land rcfcrEcd to in this conwd En€nt is described as foll,or.s: Lot {5, a resubdivision of Ehe SErauss Su}rdivisi.on, VaiI Village WesL, ptlingNo. 2, Lots 46 and 4?, aceording ro che plat reeorded March 6, ZOO2 aLRecept i o31 Nc. ?88302, County o€ Eaglc, seaE. of Colcrado, (for infonnrEional purposes only; 1936 Wesc Gore creek Drive PREIIIIJ}I: Olrne r, s Policy S 426.00Tax CercificaE. S 15. OOForrn 130.2 - OEC EndorsemenE S 40.00 12/03/03 12t40:12 es LMI289 ; | .r t/A'^rlr d r:u un s0uvll{0] lgvllulH llJV Isl l/lv9u:ll i00z '9t 'uvlll L1/ JJ t.VJ lZ;{!J: tr. E5 tlltl'ot O^ FGis& No, L344-87 (co-88)- AIJTA Plain lranguage Cffiri Ertent SCIEDUIJE I - 6ecti.on 1 Older No.Es810 3 280 3 R6quirc$cnt9 fhe follotciug requi renent s rrust be net: (al Pay che agreed amour.'t e for Lhe interest in rhe I and. and/or for i nsured . I .!e, qrote.tr,!1't the morcaage to be (b) Pay us th€ pr€miums, feets and charges for che poliry. (c) obtain a certificace of Eaxes due fron the counEy treasuletr or the counEytreasurer's authorized agen!. (d) Provide us che "Affidavit and Indemni C.y', aigned by the part.jes listed inParagtaph 3, Schedule A of Ehis Conmitmene and hotarized, (The forrn will beprovided ar closing by rhe AgenE) (e) fhe AEent, musE conduct t,he closing of ehe Cransact.ion !o be insured under ehie Cor$ni Ement. or propefJ,y execut€d instr.$encs creating Ehe eBCaCe or interes! bo beinsured rnust be delivered to the Agenc issuing lbe Conmi tment withj.n 24 hours ofrhe closing. (f) The following documenls garisfactory to us mus t, be sigrned, d,el.ivsred and recorded: 1. Warranty Deed euff,icienE !o eonvey the f€e €imple estat.e aE interest in Eheland descrlbed or referr€d Eo herein, Eo the proposed rnsured, schedure A,Itern 2 a. The fol'lowing maLerral , whrch may nor necessarily be recorded, must befurnished !.o Ehe Company ro ic,s sacjsf aclion to-r,rit.: (g) comPliatlce wieh the provislon6 of secti.on 39-14-102, Colorado Revised stalureE,reguiring conurl€Eion and filing of a Real property Transfer Deelararion. (h) Evidence satis€accory to lhe company of conpliance with an ordinance enactinga real, esbate traqsfer tax vrithin the Town of Vail togeEher with aL] anendnenE,sthereco. (r) Evidence sacisfactory to Ehe company BhaE the lgper Eagle Valley ConsolidatedSanitatlon DrsErjcE and Vail ValIey Con:clidated hJaier DiEtric! NoCice ofEncrrnbrance and F.esolucion recorded June 6, 199G in Book 696 at page 320 hasbeen paid in full. NOtE: IF fHE PRICE OF IHE STE.fECT PROPERTY EXEEEDS S1OO,OOO.OO THE SELLERsllALL BE REoIJTRED r\) COilpLy WI1H THE DIscLostRE OR WITHHOI,DINC PROVISTONS OF E.R.S.J9-22-604.3 IDENT WITHI{OLDING ) . 7 ,lt0 290'0N s0uvil10l lcvl lull.]r,'lv ls l [iv9z : I I i00u '91 'uv[{ %. 1344-82 (co-89) rin language Cormi tDent SCHEDULEE-Seceion2 der No. ES81032803 Excel)t j,o$s lny policy we issue will have Ehe f,ollowing e:tcepEions unl€ss they are Eak€n €arG of !o ou! Ealigfaction: Reserva!ions and excepcionE in patents and. in acEg auEhorizing thetr issuanee ae Ehe sane may affect the su.bjeet property and specifically, the right of the proprreE,or of a vein or Iode !o exEract end renove his ore ebrerefrom should lhe 6a$re be found to penet.raEe or inEerseet the premj.ses as se! forch in Uniged SEAces Petent recorded in fhe Eagle County records, Reservat,ion€ and exceptions in Pacenes and AcEs authorizing cheir issuance a8 thc sarne nay affecC Ehc subject property and specifically, the rights to ditches and r€servoirs used in connectjon wj.th vested and accrued $raEer righEs Eogether wich she reservation of a right of way for ditches and canals constructed by the authority of Ehe UnjEeil states as seE forth in lhat cerEain United SEates Pacene recorded in the Eag'le Couney recordc. covenanEs, condt!ion8 and restrictions, which do noe include a forfeiture or reverter clause, seq forth in the insrrumenc recorded April 7, 1965 in Book i90 at, Page 551. Anendrnent of said covenants, condiEionr and restricEions by an ins Lrunent recorded Febtruary t6, 1970 in Book 217 aB Page '75. Provisions reEarding race, color, creed, and nacional orlgin, if any, are deleEed, T€n percent non-par Eicipaeing rgyalEy j.nE€rest, in and !o proceed,s derived from ghe sale of any minerals of whatgoever kind and nature produced end mined from said prernisee, and any and all assigrunenEs Ehereof or inLeresEs Eherein, as conrained in lrlarranty Deed recorded gcrober 30, L962 in Eook 165 af Page 407, 'l l. Terils, conditions, provisions, ag'reene$q d obl igat ions Easenent by and b€two€n Clarence Hgry{t,.7r . , and Judi t,h quaei-nunicipal specilied under lhe Ann Hooper and The corporat ion recordeduppe! Eagl,e val ley sani tFtj April 21, 1970 in Eook ae Page 490. Eagg$enEs, conditions, resrrctions and reservations as shown or reserved on che recorded PIar of vail vi.llage weec Filing No. Z. Easem€nts, condiEions, regtriceions and reservations as shown otr the Plac of Strauss Subdivision recorded May 2S, 1991 in Book 554 at Page ?82 ac Recepcion No. 45091.?,, including, but not lirnited Lo, a 12 fooE ut,rlicy and drainage easemetrt along Ehe Southerly porEion of 6ubject proPerly. 6. Terms, conditions and provjsions of Encumbrance and Resolution recorded June 5, 1996 in Book 595 ac Page 320. Upon complianc€ wiEh Schedu]e B-1 reguiremene (h) herein, said exception vtill be deleEed. r ,l f 98'0N s0uvrl0l lcvilulH nv isl Llv9Z:ll f00l'9t uvn tt*a**it||l||ttl*||*a*atlaf*ll+*lt*lltt*llltt'tt*+'l+lrt**a:t*'|t**+'|tl*'l*a+:ltt****fr!ral*a'|l'l**'3'i'irta** TOWNOFVAIL, (X)IORADO Stot€mmtfa*tafltrtal+ariai+aaallalfttaa'i'lt****rtt*a*'tttta*tatat*attaf**t**tl*rt****at+a:a';a+**ta*a*rtltafa gtaterent lnrnber: R040006{63 emount ! E50o.oo o8l2o/2oo4L0:28 Atl Payrent l,l€Chod: Check InLt: ilg Notatlon: 5415,/DAIITIS BUIIJDERS P€r lt IIo: P8C040018 Tl/I)es PEC - Variancc Parcel No: 21031230?028 Sit€ Addreac: 0 W OOnB CRBEK DR VAIIJ LocatLoo: 1935 WA8T CIORB CRBEK DRwE Total FeeB: $5OO.OO Tbls Pal|ocot,: $500.00 ToEal AIJtrr hts! $500.00. Balance: S0.00+a'|*i+lrtl*a*al**aa|ltatat*a+*'t****atiar*f+**trttt*ar**r*ar**t+**'tlt{,*t*tta*******l|}{rlarai**aal+ ACCOTJNTITEM LtrST: Account Code lbscription Current ffis PV O{)1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES 500. 00 MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department ORrcINAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: lt. October 11,2004 A request for a sile coverage variance, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow lor a variance lrom Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vaif Town Code, to allow for site coverage in excess ot 20% of lhe total site area, located at 1936 West Gore Creek DriveiLot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael R. Dantas, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, Ltd. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel SUMMARY The applicant, Michael Dantas, is requesting a variance f rom Section 1 2-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20o/o of the total site area, located at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2. The requested variance is the result of a proposal lo cover the exterior enlryway to the residence, which is currenlly undergoing the preliminary stages of construction on a non-conforming 9,931 square foot lot. Staff is recommending denlal of the requested variance because a practical dilficulty or hardship does not exist and approval of the variance would constitute a granting of special privilege to this property owner. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a sile coverage variance in order to enclose the entryway to his residence, which is currently under construction in West Vail. The lot is zoned Primary/Secondary and the allowable site coverage ol 20/" in that dislrict would be exceeded, through the granting of the requesled variance, by 3.1%, or 312 square feet. The applicant believes that a hardship exists due to the small size of the non- conforming 9,931 square fool lot. A vicinity map depicting the location of the residence is attached for reference (attachment A). Reduced copies of the proposed site plan and elevalions are attached for reference (attachment B) as is the written requesl from the applicant's representative (attachment C) and the public notice thal preceded lhe request (attachment D). BACKGROUND The subject property is located at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive. The subdivision in which the subject property is located was originally subdivided in Eagle County in 1965. The area was annexed into the Town in the early 1980's, de-annexed in 1985, then re-annexed into the Town in 1986, at which time the lot in question became non-conforming, due to its total size ilt. tv. of less than 15,000 square feet. In 1 990, the property owner received approval of a minor suMivision for the creation of one lot, which erased the lot line between Lots 46 and 47 and thus brought the lot into conformance with the minimum lot size requirements. However, on June 28, 2001, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved another minor subdivision and a variance from the minimum lol size requiremenls for the re-creationof two separate lots, Lot 46 and Lot 47. The most recent subdivision lett Lot 46 as it is currently sized, .228 acres, or 9,931 square feet. \ '^ 't) r'' "1"*''*' t fn W[l tt't' nF {V The final plans for the new single-family residence were approved on April 7, 2004 by the Design Review Board wilh a vote of 4-0 and a condition involving the submission of accurate floor plans to the Community Development Department prior to application for a building permit. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES The PEG ls resoonsible for evaluatlno a oroposal for: Action: The PEC is responsible for tinal approval/denial of a variance. The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: 1. The relationship of lhe reguested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal inlerpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity ol treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Desion Review Board: Action:The DRB has no review authority on a variance, but must review any arco mpanyi ng D R B appl i cati o n. Town Councll: Actions of the Design Review Board or the Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the DRB or PEC erred with approvals or denials, and may uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the Board's decision. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to lhe technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The statf also advises the applicant as lo compliance with the design guidelines. Statf provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff 2 v. evaluation of lhe project with respecl to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Zonlng Regulations Sectr'on 1 2-2 Definitions S|TE COVERAGE: The ratio of the total building area on a site to the total area of a site, expressed as a percentage. For the purpose of calculating site average, "building area" shatl mean the total horizontal area of any building, carport, porte achere, arcade, and covered or roofed walkway as measured from the exterior face of perimeter walls or suryorting olumns above grade or at ground level, whichever is the greater area. For the pirpose{of this definition, a balcony or deck projecting from a higher elevation may ertend'over a lower balcony, deck or walkway, and in such case the higher balcony or deck shall not be deemed a roof or avering for the lower balcony, deck or walkway. ln addition to the abve, building area shall also include any portion of a roof overhang, eaves, or covered stair, covered deck, covered porch, covered terrace or avered patio that extends more than four feet (4') from the erterior face of the perimeter building walls or supporting cplumns. *ctton 12-6D"9 Prtmary/Secondary District (in part) l2-6D-5: LOT AREA AND S|TE DTMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty teet (30). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet (80') on each side, within its boundartes. (Ord. 12(1978) S 3: Ord. 30(1977) S 2) 12-6D-9: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20/) of the totalsite area. (Ord. 41(1990) $ 5: Ord.30(1977) S 2) *ction 12-17 Varianccs (in part) 12-17-1: PURPOSE: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the obiectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practicat difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result trom the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topograpihic or physicat anditions on the site or in the immediate vicintty; ol from other pv;ical limitations, street locations or @nditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. 12-17-5: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSTON ACTION: Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a pubtic hearing on a variance appliatbn, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submitted or may approve the application subiect to such modifications or nnditions as itdeems necessary to accomplish the purposesof thistitle, or the commission may deny the application. A variance may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other mnditions as the ammission may prescribe. 12-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT: Approvalof thevariance shalllapse and becomevoid if abuilding permitis notobtained and construction not ammenced and diligently pursued toward umpletion within two (2) years from when the approval becomes final. VI. ZONING ANALYSIS Zoning: Two-Fami[ Primary/Secondary Develooment Standard Allowed/Required Existino (approved Prooosed Lot Area: 9,931 sq. ft. 9,931 sq. ft. no change Setbacks:Fronl: 20 ft. no change no change Sides: 15 ft. no change no change Rear: 15 ft. no change no change Building Height: 33' 32' no change Site Goverage: 1,986.34 sq. ft.(20%) 1,986.34 sq. ft. (20olo)2,301 sq. tl-(23.1Vo) Landscape Area: 5,966.85 sq. ft. (60%) 6,298 sq. ft. (63.3%) no change Parking: 3spaces SsPaces 3sPaces VIt. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zonino North: Residential Primary/Secondary South: Residential Eagle County Jurisdiction East: Residential Primary/Secondary West: Residential Eagle County Jurisdiction VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideration of Factors Reoardinq the Site Coveraoe Variance: 1 . The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. According to the Town's records, the average lot size of surrounding B. homes in the Vail Village West 2no Filing is 12,000 square feet, yet many owners have managed to design their structures to comply wilh the 20olo site coverage requirement that exists for residences within the Primary/Secondary zoning district. 2. The degree to which relief from the strlct and literal interpretatlon and enlorcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vlcinity or to attain the obiectives of this title wlthout a grant of special privilege. In spite of its non-conforming size, Lot 46 complies with the site dimension requirement of the Vail Town Code, Section 12-6D-5, which states that Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet on each side within its boundaries". Therefore, staff believes that since the residence was originally designed to comply with the sile coverage standard for its lot, that standard should be maintained. A variance from the Planning and Environmental Gommission would be viewed by staff as the grant of a special privilege. 3. The efiect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportatlon and traffic facllities, public facllltles and utillties, and public safety. The above item is irrelevant to the applicant's request. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commisslon deems appllcable to the proposed variance. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinqs before orantino a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classilied in the same districl. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to lhe public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulalion would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of lhe variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends denial of the request for a variance from Section 12-60-9, Site Coverqge, to allow lor 23.1% site coverage at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive, Lot 464/ail Village 2d Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Seclion Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance, the Community Development Department recommends that the lollowing findings be made: a) That the granting of the variance will constitute a grqtilg ol special privilege' inconsistent witn ine limitations on other properties classified in the same district. b) That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to ihe public health, safety, or' welfare, ol mate1alry injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. T-e-sricijnteryelatjln or er-{9rc949{gl!9 ATTACHMEIIITS A. Vicinity MapB. Reduced PlansC. Applicant's RequestD. Publication Notice c) 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department November 8, 2004 A request for a site coverage variance, pursuant to Chapte-r 12'1.7, Variances, Vail town Code, to allow for a variance from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% of the total site area, located at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael R. Dantas, represented by Mauriello Planning Group' Ltd. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel il. SUMMARY The applicant, Michael Dantas, is requesting a variance from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Tbwn Code, to allow for sile coverage in excess of 20'h of the total site area, localed at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2. The requested variance is the result of a proposal to cover, by means of an overhang, the exterior entryway to the residence, which is currently undergoing the preliminary stages ol conslruction on a non- conforming 9,931 square Joot lot. Slaff is recommending denial of the requested variance because ipractical difficulty or hardship does not exist and approval of the variance would constitute a granting of special privilege to this property owner' DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a site coverage variance in order 1o cover and partially enclose the entryway to his iesidence, which is currently under construction in West Vail. The lot is zoned Frimary/Secondary and the allowable site coverage of 20% in thal district would be exceeded, through the granting of the requested variance, by 3.17", or 312 square feet. The applic-ant believes that a hardship exists due to the small size of the non- conforming g,931 square foot lot. A vicinily map depicling the location of the residence is attached f6r reference (attachment A). Reduced copies of the proposed site plan and elevations are attached for reference (attachment B) as is the written request from the applicant's representative (attachment C) and the public notice that preceded the request (attachment D). BACKGROUND The subject property is located at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive. The subdivision in which the subject iroperty is located was originally subdivided in Eagle County in 1965. The area was annexed inio me Town in the early 1980's, de-annexed in '1985, then re-annexed into the Town in 1986, at which time the lot in question became non-conforming, due to its total size of less than 15,000 square feet. In 1990, the properly owner received approval of a minor subdivision for the creation of one lot, which erased lhe lot line between Lots 46 ,,4\1sJ nwnimtaY 1il. and 47 and thus broughl the lol into conformance with the minimum lot size requirements. However, on June 28,2001, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved another minor subdivision and a variance from the minimum lot size requirements forthe re-creation of two separate lots, Lot 46 and Lol 47. The most recent subdivision left Lot 46 as il is currently sized, .228 acres, or 9,931 square feet. The final plans for the new single-family residence were approved on April 7, 2004 by the Design Review Board with a vote of 4-0 and a condition involving the submission of accurate floor plans to the Community Development Department prior to application for a building permit. On October 11,2004,the Planning and Envlronmental Commission held a public hearing and tabled lhe application, requesting that additional information be found regarding instances in which site coverage variances had been granled lo instances of new construclion. Please note that only one example of a site coverage variance application for new construction was found. The variance application was denied bythe Planning and Environmental Commission. The lable included as Attachment E represenls a random site coverage variance application sampling from Single-Family or Two-Family residential districts within the Town's files. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES The PEC is responsible for evaluatino a proposal for: Action: The PEC is responsible for final approval/denial of a variance. The PEC is responsible for evalualing a proposal for: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Desion Review Board: Action:The DRB has no review authority on a variance, but must review any acco m pany i ng D R B appl icati o n. Town Council: Actions of the Design Review Board or the Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whelher or not the DRB or PEC erred with approvals or denials, and may uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the Board's decision. V. Staff : tfre statt is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The slaff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines' Staff ppvides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendalion on approval, approval wilh conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Zoning Regulations Section 1 2-2 Definitions S|TE COVERAGE: The ratio of the total building area on a site to the total area of a site, expressed as a percentage. For the purpose of calculating site coverag,e, 'building area". shall mean the totat hori1ontal area of any buitding, carport, porte cochere, arcade, and covered or roofed walkway as measured from the exterior face of perimeter walls or supporting columns above grade or at ground level, whichever is the greater area. For the purposes-of this definition, i batcony or deck proiecting from a higher ele.vation nay e!9nd. 'over a lower balcony, deck or walkway, and in such case the higher balcony or deck shall not be deemed a roof or covering for the lower balcony, deck or walkway. ln addition to the above, building area shall also include any portion of a roof overhang, eaves, or covered stair, covered deck, covered porch, covered terrace or covered patio that extends more than four feet (4) from the exterior face of the perimeter building walls or supporting columns' Section 12-6D-g Primary/Secondary District (in part) 12-6D-5: LOT AREA AND S|TE DTMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontag'e of thirty feet (30'). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enctosing a squAre area,- eighty feet (80') on each side, within its boundaries. (Ord. 12(1978) $ 3: Ord. s0(1e77) I2) 12-GD-9: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total site area. (Ord. 41(1990) $ 5: Ord. 30(1977) S 2) Section 12-17 Variances (in Part) 12-17-1: PURPOSE: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the obiectives of this title as would result from stric{or liierat interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shZpe, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topograp'hic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other pitysicat timitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or litera! compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. ? 12-17-5: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION: Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a variance application, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submitted or may approve the application subiryt to such modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the application. A variance may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission may prescribe. 12-17-7: PERMIT APPBOVAL AND EFFECT: Approvat of the variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within tvvo (2) years from when the approval becomes final. ZONING ANALYSIS Zoning:Two-Family PrimaryiSecondary Developmenl Standard Allowed/Required Existino (approved) Prooosed Lot Area: 9,931 sq. ft. 9,931 sq. ft. no change Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Building Height: Site Coverage: Landscape Area: Parking: 20 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 33', no change- no change no change 32' no change no change no change no change 1,986.34 sq. ft.(20%) 1,986.34 sq. ft. (20%)2,301 sq. ft. (23.1%l 5,966.85 sq. ft. (60%) 6,298 sq. ft. (63.3%) no change 3 spaces 3 spaces 3 spaces SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING North: South: East: Wesl: Land Use Residential Residential Residential Residential Zonino Primary/Secondary Eagle County Jurisdiction Primary/Secondary Eagle County Jurisdiction VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideralion of Factors Reqardino lhe Site Coveraqe Variance: 1 . The relationship of rhe requested variance to other existing or potential n uses and structures in the vicinity. According to the Town's records, the average lot size of surrounding homes in the Vail Village Wesl 2no Filing is 12,000 square feet, yet most owners have managed to design struclures which comply with the 20% site coverage requiremenl that exists for residences within the Primary/Secondary zoning district. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and unilormity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives ot this title without a grant of special privilege. In spite of its non-conforming size, Lot 46 complies with the site dimension requiremenl of the Vail Town Code, Section 12-6D-5, which states that "each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet on each side within its boundaries". Therefore, staff believes that since the residence was originally designed to comply with the site coverage standard for its lot, that standard should be maintained. A variance from the Planning and Environmental Commission would be viewed by statf as the grant of a special privilege. 3. The effect ol the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The above item is irrelevant to the applicant's request. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before orantinq a variance: 1 . That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same dislrict. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be delrimentalto the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinitY. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The stricl literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title' b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally 1o other properties in the same zone. 5 c. The slrict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same dislrict. IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends denial of the requesl for a variance from Sec{on 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, to allow tor 23.|o/"sile coverage at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive, Lot 46//ail Village 2no Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Slaff does not believe that a practical ditficulty or unnecessary physical hardship is resu1ing from the size, shape, or dimensions "of a site orthe location of existing structures thereon." Furthermore, Staff's research has yielded the finding that examples of inslances wherein the Planning and Environmental Commission has approved a site coverage variance for a lo1 undergoing new construction is a rare, if not unprecedented, occurrence. Should the Planning and Environmenlal Commission choose to deny this variance, the Community Development Department recommends that the following findings be made: a) That lhe granting of the variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsislent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. b) That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c) The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulalion does not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsislent with the objectives ol this title. d) The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation does not deprive the applicani of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properlies in the same district. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity MapB. Reduced PlansC. Applicant's RequestD. Publication NoticeE. Site Coverage Variance Application sampling table 11 .--=-=-.-f---lr l___-,/ rr miril + * I I dli ('/ II I --i I I l I I I I I I irt----t iliifj/t t trq;e "''nH#!7ryou,,.' i .,,'wf;Jffiffi oo* l r:;?;.;*r, /f 1fl,#lffrilffhtJS, /, ll',Itt ) A __---------1,1) .-r----1950 i rA"a{*/ ['r\l>. 1 \O \I\: ='. I =\. AW Y.\-r\ g ^.1 / i r',J\-6---- _ -\-(o\l \ '9#\\H.U r;;t€E !8,! giE EE.E ;; i.gE oi g ! Oo II f v luaurqceilv l!6ebz9 t1o€ grbt !J6 gtc't - Y:i!v oNaa:v Nlau r TYMf!^||JOtultoq bc;l - 39r/tl1/q) aL TleLJd-f1J % L) q q€'E - vt!./ !oo1! !n€|vt^t tv.tolJj pg el!.l - yttv lJOtlJ tt€fyg^.t 1a/€1>l3.l.lt! 09 a?t - \|.;EA/ 8ocrtJ frctv? n tt^el !:N,rr1 -*€9- Virrv ;uY2gdnft - \€ta/ lJoo'l! 3g\arvt - \.ilrv :llt€ crs rto rtut q[J orrjEr{ 'l|'o!ol rr4,nE tq,ot *)t j\c.FD et ftr er. 6!td..t__q . *r d.,!.iiiE ^ *ii:!f,i; ;:'"i ;'.tT,:f,?;:u I ,-jal ,q ot,a4 Ddn a.l.trj %LJI,€ oo.t - ytdv !9\.!JV9 ln€r\/rr@Tvl! arg llbE - *?dv noou i"lctvJ^l €Nr,roTv a) i&?a# # ['1\^-r# .}\l\r -t qu4, enpetps luele -___in-- N\/]A ldv2qd NV-.t,/=Jl€ bd.1 .r,.al . e orrotp) .d qrtq.cJ.ttttt n ttqo.r ttu oe. ?.^t+ / {B ! I \r s I| /:i i ,,'tg\ itis lli;j//ylr, it Il\ r i*i*\iJ -r- t I I I luauqcellv Attacl'fment C Danlas Resdence Sfte Coveraqe Vanance Affhcatron Owner: Mlc,hael Dantas March 22, 2OO4 l[r l{cl M!uriello Pbnning Group Dtin a. lr.6 rN I I l r!tafir i,$ ;.: TF dft: Illllt\ l\ H ff 's F.F #d-fiq "'",1$ 49 ,rl I l I h iii$ l, $rf,{i# lii;h + ,ll .F ]i t! I I I ilt{r Itrr' ' ti[ I qJt rl + iE I ilt , el :t ;-l itfilii '\:..* I nI I i Ii "lird !F+ / 'tiii r.+ F "E f[.+ i;Er!Itr i ! I I I F 6 rX tr+ i6!k + -l l il$liltll l ir ri r r, il I gg;Ffti/ I t I / I j t / libl I-_--1 !,,*" oun u. aesidence Ij / u;,$d /frtrfiffi l_l l'*".,:,:u{*"^';- 1, mpp design ehop. rnc. ll----lxaq lfg'e''u4r eao' I I I,.,,n,#!$;!*1ffi"-,," ll I lnLrodvchon and Svmmary of Keqvest The owner of thrs lot s requetL a stle coveraqe varance lo allow an open covercd entry leature on a new home, whrch cau9e9 the home to be over the allowable 5fte coveraqe ot 2OV"by 312 sq. ft.. or 3.lVo. rhe bt e localed on wegf Gore creek Drrve rn the MaLterhorn area. rhe bt s only 9 '944.75 s4. ll. n srze, whtch makes ft dlftcult ro destqn and burrd a r.abre znqre- famtly home wthrn lhe Zovo gtle coveraqe lmttaLrcln. rhe avvltcant E able lo have all hvtnq areag wrlhrn the home comvly wrth lhe sfte coveraqe lrmrlatron. ltowever, Lhe o?en-ar covered entry Lo the home, whtch ts consrdered ate coverage, causes lhe home to be over lhe Zovo hmrtatron. lnteresttnqly enouqh, accordnq to rown Code, rt the avvlrcant were butldrnq a walerprool deck over the entry nslead ol a "rool Iorm," no vaflance wovld be necegsary, as decks are not conadered sfte coveraqe. A deck n thg area E noL archtectvre leastble nor does ft make aeslhehc Eense. fhe aVTlcanL belteves LhaL there e a leqtltmate hardshrV on fhr' loL due lo lhe Emall grze of lhe lot, the lacL that a deck would be allowed whtch qealeg lhe same rmpact as a rool torm, and due to the precedenl eglabhshed wrth Ermrlar stle coveraqe vartanceg approved by Lhe Plannnq and Enuronmenlal Commtsston. il.? recedenl 5 ettrnq V anance Approvals there has been geveral ate coverage varanceg approved by the Tlannnq and Enuronmental Commtsston n the VasL lor homes on small noncontormtng lots. We beheve that thege aVprovals have get precedent Ior consrdelnq zmall lol gtze as a hardshtg. the lollownq e a lsl ol a lew examples of gtle coveraqe vatancee approved bv the PEC: Sfte Coverage Vanance - Lot 6, Dlock | , Vatl Vllaqe 6'h Frlrng Thtg vanance was qranLed by the PEC desVlef own Slall's recommendabon lor denal. the lot ts E,934 zq. It. and a varance wa5 qranted to allow addbonal ltung area at a tolal ale coveraqe of 2 | .7Vo. ln aVprounq the lte coveraqe vaflance, some members ol the ?tC stated the Iollownq: o John Schofteld: "the aze of the lol, betnq nonconlormrnq, covld be congtdered a tactor n qranbnq the vanance." o John Scholteld: "fhe gteep slopes and Lhe small lot stze would overcome spectal ptvtleqe." o Galen Aasland: " thrs would nol be a speaal pnuleqe, due to the tact that the lot s nonconlormtnq wtLh rc9?ect lo,srze." DanLas Regtdence Maurref lo ?lannnq Grovp, LLC 3fte Coveraqe Valance - Lot 5, Block 5E, Vail Das Schone l,t fltna rhrs varrance was qranled by the pEC to allow stle coveraqe of 23.dvo. Thrs rs a nonconformrn q lot of | | ,242 sq. fl. c 5fte Coveraqe Vanance - Lot 6, Block O, Varl Intermounrarn The ?tC aTVroved thts stle coveftqe vanance despfte the Town Stalf's recommendabon ol dental lo allow an addfttonal 3.567o ol stle coveraae. Thts e a nonconlormtnq lol ol 6,058 sq. ft. c Ste Coverage Vanance - Lot 3, Block D, Val Das Schone I't Frhng fhe PEC aVproved thts lle coveraqe vanance despfte theTown Staff's recommendatton ol dental lo allow 22Vo of sfte coveraqe. Th's 6 a / nanconlormnqtotol lO,7 t6 sq. ft./ft V{p c Sfte Coveraqe Varrance - Lat | , Dlock | , Varl Vrllaqe 6"n Fthnq .(, f Th s lol was qranLed a vanance to allow sfte coveraqe at 23,7Vo dve to a smallI "t,W lor. crze of g,3ZZ s.t.Nilw-r nll tr- .r1lv n F- ^ . lV , li/lu- ^*tr Stte Coveraqe Vanance - Lot I I , block A, Varl Das Schone I't FilnqV I lll " .rtfl- I .he PtC apVroved a stte coveraqe vartance Lo allow 2 | .3Vo of stLe coveraqe on l.,! Iyhf \ tr s nonconformtnq tor. /t\ u \ ilt.Zomnq Analysrs Zonnq: lol 3ve: 713 lwo-f amtly ?eadenttal Dtgtnct 9,944.75 sq.lt. GRFA; Butldtnq Herqht: Sfte Coveraqe: Landsca?tnq: 2qtt l4<n * 33' 1,966.34 sq. tt. J 1\JOO.ttJ 2.4. V' (zOV.) (6OVo) 2 Ang 5Z 2,301 6,290 sq. tf. sq. tt. sq. ft. (23. tVo) (c? ?'o/^\ DanLag Restdence Maurrello Plannnq Gravp, LLC lV. Apprwal Crftena t. 2. The relahonshry of Lhe requested vanance lo other exrsttnq or potenLral vses and Etrvctvreg rn the vronrty. Our Analwrs: The proposed vanance wrll allow the constrvctton oI a covered enlryway. The neqhborhood wag annexed lo the Town of Varl rn the I g7O's and made nonconformrnq wfth respecl to lot. grze. rhe appltcant s benq svblected to a hardshtp dve to lhe small lot srze maktnq t drffrcult to congtruct wrthn the zovo efte covenqe lrmrtatron. The provosed vaflance wrll allow the vrovosed home to be developed srmtlar to olher homes throvqhovt the Town lhat have small' . nonconformrnq lol azes, The deqree to whtch rehef from the slncL or lfteral nterpretabon and entorcenent ol a specrtrcd reqvlatton E neceesary to achteve compahbltty and unrformrfy ol treatment amonq ates rn ihe vrcrnrty, or lo altatn lhe oblect:es ol thrs frtle wrthoul qrant ol speaal pr:leqe. Our Analwrs: The PEC has lovnd n the paet tha! small nonconformrn q lot stzes presenl a hardshtg lo develoVment and havb thdiatoie aVVroved sfte coveraje'i:Air.nces on nonconformnq lots throuqhout the Town of Varl. The proposed vanance wrll allow thrs lol to be treated srmrlarly to others wrthrn the Town of Varl that efther exsl wrth srte covenqe n excesg of ZOVo or were qranted vaflances to allow homes n excess ol lhe ZOVo hmrtatron. Therelore the gfte caveraqe vanance lor the entry enclosure E noL a qranl ol speaal pr:leqe and allows the f own ol Vail achrcve unrformrty ol Ereatment.. fhe ellect ol lhe requesled vanance on ltqhl and atr, dtglrtbvbon ol po?ulabon, lrans?ortahon and lrallc laaltbes, Vubltc laciltbee ana uttllhes, and pubhc safety. Our AnalErs: The proVosed vaflance lor an open-atr covered entry lealure has ltlhle, i any, e+lecl on the above lgled Bsveg. Dantas Resdence Maurrello Flannrng Grot-tp, LLC a Attachment D THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on October 11,2OO4, at 2:fl) PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a site coverage variance, pursuant to Chapter 12-17,Yariances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a variance from Section 12-6D-9, Sile Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for site coverage in excess ot 20o/" of the total site area, located at 1 936 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael R. Dantas represented by Mauriello Planning Group, Ltd.Planner: Elisabeth Eckel An appeal of an administrative action denying a request for a "busrness office'on the first floor or street level of the Sitzmark Lodge, pursuant to Section 12-78-3, Permitted And Conditional Uses; First Floor Or Street Level, Vail Town Code, located at 183 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 58, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Bob Fritch, representing Jim BrandmeyerPlanner: Warren Campbell A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed text amendment to Section 12-7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses, First Floor or Street Level, and Section 12-71- 3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor Street Level, Vail Town Code, to add "temporary business offices" as a conditional use in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 & 2 zone districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Tom Braun, representing Vail Resorts, Inc.Planner: George Ruther A request for a worksession to present various site plan altematives for the proposed Vail Conference Center, located at 395 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Russ Forrest An appeal of an administrative action denying a request to "setl skier parkingpasses"on Level 3, Cascade Village Parking Structure, Development Area A, Special Development District No. 4, pursuant to the parking provisions prescribed in Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991 , located at 1000 South Frontage Road, #3f/ail Cascade Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Vail Parking LLC, represented by Robert W. Oliva Planner: George Ruther The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town ol Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the sile visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Published, Seplember 24,2OO4, in the Vail Daily. Attachment: E !tt r*Ei98oEF8€e 9-CE€EE-i a{ ; I a rfEi5E€t 1*g-E€i e6 Fe EEigE gE€EE e Fe I.sE;!: g EEgEi* z z 5 o;! 9.oggoEgg 9-9 EE'i ai; a a eEEt' EEEi: IF€€6e EBE€E€ €aEgE gEde.b : !:6-q Ei*r'9e EeEigEeiEEE5*r35 E; 2 EI E€ 'EI E * g €5 E e I I - T at Bt EI ! 5 E {.E € i'E I 'E € I €€t *a 5 o E 3 p E c f T E a p t6 f (, E 5 € a3 9fi E E E €€ E a 3I I g B f(l 6 g8p.-st t=9.:o s!tE E * f i p E Et9t E E6 .E 5 6 d 'Q ie !t c 6 *;S E AeI nt re8 xi iea;a aeI Ri N aa ao l! 9 *e3E I (\r gXo I .og dE !l ,Eif- gos 5o E eE 6 S.E c9e oiqt !tt a e AE I9 o 6 I F II il '6 .\' 3 .e E it I tr a 6 t =t! e 5 t6 I E E g 6 o 3 3 J 6 II IE -9 6 J ai € .9 dt 5 .e 5 tE ep J J ;t66 jJ P Ii 5 J d = t i E =t Po! -g .go z E 6dl .5 I 6 E .E FI ao i5 F tn o o I 6 o o g € ^6 q. 6 z r! E 6 6 = .5 5 s o ( FITE COPY November 4, 20O4 Mr. Dominb Mauriello, AICP ifaudello Plannlng Grcup, LLC PO Box4058 Edlvards, CO 81632 Rs: 1936 West Gore Creek Drlve/Lot 46, Vail Village West 2d Filing PEC040018 Site Cororage Variance Dear Dominic, Thank you tor submlttlng an applbation lor Planning and Environmental Commission revlew ol a site corrsregs variance requsst at the addmss referenced above. Per your request, I have wilhdrawn the apdicatlon and am enclosing the lorm signfiing s.rch for lour records. Please let me know if I can be of any fufther servbe. B€st regards, 970.479.2454 cc: Michael Dantas PO Box4015 Avon,GO 81620 enclosure From: To: Date: Subiect: Hi Elisabeh: "Dominic Mauriello' <mauriello@comcast. net> "Elisabeth Eckel" <EEckel@vailgov.com> 1'll03l20o4. 11:30:47AM Dantas I am offtcially withdrawing the Dantias Variance Application. Please make sure the agenda reflecb that this item is withdrawn. Thanks br all of your help on this. Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP PO Box 1127 5601AWldridge Road Avon. Colorado 8,|620 (970) 7484920 phone (970) 748-0377 fax (970) 376-3318 cell mauriello@comcast. net CC:"'Leslie Tillman"' <LTillman@vailgov.com>, "Wanen Campbell"' <WCampbell @vailgov. com> Wu4ooI# rlololnl -lotlNl -sl\)l1-l$l>l s$$$$ E$8$$ $PtFt:s fisf $t(I) ool-slol slsl'6 1q)lsl o.] o.l EI =a)4 <s 0t '- A llq) q) L \) q,Ll-onos{rOdto o({) 'Gg q)v o${-fs$ A q) J4 iiil Ils !! iFi $i ttt 12 I II ;t il Az htuIo '2ul'dotls uhge? ddw ztzffitb rrc') J*-ffi-ob tl.L z@|9 q)'e?,nm?a UEE xq oe J&,s 7lq1'e ?gntlqnxr'tc LglS q)'I3 eNJa W.r) eJoS t%tgebL ")u"?ls"d wuea e\!A ,$iil IJt T k h v-oo ,,,!i,,il,ii,,l,tit,rnl!,,,1r rliil,i,!ll,!,,,,' Irrt Ir.rt r.rtrlrl ttr r I t !tt r,t ii ll ltrl |, rr r rllr I rl I ,fu i,rlli,L!l|lrrti!ri[,,ln,ri',l,iii,lii,r,!r rth rtl !t.ll r'htiltr r,l!t.! !rll.t.r r. r rrl llll. !t I r rr itLr,rirrr,tlr,!!rt,,,tll',lt,i! tll,ill!r,,,ilir r!rrlrt:ltrrrllrrtllti.l...ltlrl I r I r I t t. I r r I I t ! ! irl,ll,rt|ll,,!,,,i,!inirr,rlirlithiill,ttt,,r, r ltrl rllllh r trnl r..r!tiltl tttlt ntltr, rfulrr..t. o Hz J filuztu \D $ffiin$ir!ica r{! iii iii tiiiir llrll'il i,iili!lii tItt T Il !i It rilt( !ll I tii! II tl i!llEi iI T! fli iii ri iill ir I T !It!IIItfI.l ttt! It I!li, ul iili!l iir s 6z Ho Jttuztuo lhir r$ il rii ItIIII!1 ff il t I I I t t t I I I tIt I I I n llI T ti ii i!tr !, I lI lt II ii l!it t E IfIII t I II E EEEI E EEE El tEl E E$ $$$l s ss$ sl 8$l $ $ $ml nTl$lt tl l$ llll$[[$illtlll 6 I tgeol;'\- --1 6.-Fr6l---+ 19 I.< ,-.;+\..-.-- 't'?.d.^L-J - ----- -5-:'-': ''or. o ao? s6 5l > liih****riii i i i li,tiiiirfgf,i* IittEl it!I ET Ig !i !$r x; s ,ll+ $*i"'".{! rr*," i I i s €dkffx#o _:-:--.--- c 4Sr_vSA/, ailrly ZIE&frLbtta)LffitlaL zgJSo)'G?3rw t ccu xa€t oe J@Anqr'efuntpl/.1.}*|'rc L4ue c)'tp^ eNJCI \..8' 2199 IAQ,A 9tu1 7ilePl6"d e$Ed e\!A'aul'dotlo u1!se? ddw EDGE OF PAVEMENT 946-- -7950___ I--{| --...\ -'-------195o' --1- I -l \> m Z\ Cf \ I ti- - i t--| 1., / -\ --1 \Trl arn l-Fl -l\ I\.1 \ t,. '.9 f'ra--LAr- _(o\ ..@ t- I_L- I ...1 K I I I I!t\ I -//-.,- I.zl1 /./ \ '.. ----:-J-------l- o lJ Ttt t r,, -----------.-...-''-ttll .--=-.^.5LMFNr ro r, =-)- '=---' ---l-'-:':-t (nt 1ot agq;-="iiAxa N {I2 -___----J--_-------_-_l__ I Ir----l- ll L I I -l zl I tttl ltttl 'oul'doLle. u6lEe? ddw ZlZffitu tliBJ aebFggQQll' tl.L cgtgq)'.P,3tw LAU r<oe oa toEe Ttrqt's irlnll.4bll.t. wre Lgue q)'t|F.^ a^lJo, \7.8' 2p9 1sast 9€bl ?)ue? a?J eTtEd e\lbt EFI! "lflilili$' q N { 'oul'dottra uh'ee? ddw e$R|ffit'iaJl*ffi.1.Leg c o)''P.rit?atEwroctd loaeilrn'Efurw?lix'wre L*tle e2'tF.^ 1r7U"?F4 *r7tw e\lA I i! ! I () N { rl--r--l-rll t- lllr -+ ---------.r-lllllr { ---l (f) {I ZJZS@Lbzrta)JWbtl.L cque q)'aP"3flPa tev r.oct oJ JOZO 7tq1' I ?erflIofta bWre '2ul'dot1e. udge? ddw + illild H I I I I ?l !|l q n'l i i,l l$ir + g$ .ld q q 1 ritl liiit 'lh + fliq Fl d ,l Ir fl fi I I r$ l$i 'Id + fll + ffi(fl f, 1 i$ tc tr ll tl I I !l t II 3 t I I 5r $l It iIr II I tlrllo r$i l$l I I 3 \ I irrt3! iir i $ ffit 1i i$ir5[ i $ ll ,l _J-l $ I( E /' -t- II i! I I I t-r- iIl $ 1 I d rl ql fli+ i I I I I I ill+ i + I tl Sr i I I I HI0 \ 'li' )i i\ ffir I lEr i'ili $g ', J tf I it rt l$ ! t/ ,t/l/l ql al ilr+ L4t e q)'lB aNJA aaaE) 216p Taasi 9Ebl e^)? edt *luea e\!l^l T fi[tl I Ii llI I I I , tJ l- I Ir $t t t I ! TI T Irl Ir iEr $il9$t I gl!iltHl llll ll q (f)F]tI! r * ltlililF*$ Zt4j4EWLbtlcJ Jffitutl.L zgtae d)'.p3iw LEC? r<a€t oa J&g ?i,txt'g tenq6nawse'cul'dot|s uhpaV ddw ''] l LEqLS q).TEA .t\lE, \4.!) eJoQ TqrM gEbl ""ue? sd suea e\lbl I ilt $: $ 1 rli iii j I qi Itl tlf'',]l[,![l i\ i/ IlitiI l$ i'l I I tii+I l dlJr'tll dllqt Ht A\:l j ____l l$ fr lll,i\ Ilili $ *$ Nt' \ l\ i!l isi !lrl il $ls ili+ ,' / lIIilI lirlir6, P,$tr .[i$$ Inrut i.[ltEi [il r"----lT------l I I I I I I I -----r- \It IirET' !I ",__l _ __L !iliil riflliil ,\ ltii '$ [ I ,-t)Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community De\relopmert 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tef : 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail,co.us Projst Name: Dantas Residence DRB Number: DRBO40076 Proiect Description: NEW SINGTf FAMILY RESIDENCE Participants: OWNER DANTAS, MICHAEL 03/15/2004 Phone: PO BOX,1015 AVON co 81620 Liense: APPUCANT JARDIS, PAULW. 03/16/2004 Phone: PO BOX 3320 AVON co 81620 License: ProiectAddress: OWGORECREEKDRVAIL ^.\ Location;1936WESTGORECREEKDRTVE -/ I " f u*t 6tt-ro^ \J,-a! M- Legal Description: [oB 46 Block Subdivision: Struus#ivisbb Parcel Number: 210312307028 Comments: BOARD/ TAFF ACTION MoUon By: Viele Action: APPROVED Second By: Woldridr Vote: 4{ Dateof Apprcvalz 03lIl20O4 Conditions: Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). @nd:0 (Pl3N): DRB approval does not onstitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond:201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is ommenced and is diligently purcued toward completion. Planner: George nutf DRB Feid: g65o.oo General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval, Description of the Request: Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2t39 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us RE(]ETVED ,-t.rt . ? j , Location ofthe Proposal tot: t(e ebck: ilb subdivision: *ra, Ot/,!,!L ',air l2? of O?SrContact Eagte Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning:P/5 Name(s) of Owner(s)l Mailing Address:PO,>r /or 64, co Name of Applicant:/l/,"haql fl.. f)ar-le.< Mailing Address:&. B ox //D/5 E-mail Address: /o 8,/o z o Phone: 7 'o- Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs I Conceptual Review ,-{)ve* ConstructionL-d Addttion n Minor Alteration . (multi-family/commercial) D Minor Alteration (sin gle-family/duplex) D Changes to Approved Plans tr Separation Request ,b;::::":. -:':il .:;;,.,,, fK^ryn$ \-$3O0 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Design Review Board. For Offi Fee Paid: Application Date: Plan ner: No Fee Planning Staff or the zln Dae TOl4ilVffi Application for Design Review Department of Community Danelopment 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teli 97O.479.2L39 taxi 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us General InformaUon: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is reguested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The p@ect may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental C.ommission. Design review apprcval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Desctiption of the Request, Nertf Cr*'J /ra..{ro n Location of the Proposalz tot: I b Alock:-suuaivision' Sh-eus Sal\dilistia' ng c, Go,- Cae.c, k 0 ri,: <Physical Address: Parcel No.:(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no,) zonang: ?r't rttq'V 5 e Coot lo Tz Name(s) of owner(s): /ll, " ho - | ' 0. ,1o S Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant!/14,. ha- I Dn- /.< Mailing Address: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Type of R.eview and Fee: tr Signs E Conceotual Review FNew Constructiontr Addition tr Minor Alteration (multFfamily/commercial) tr Minor Alteration (single-family/duplex) D Changes to Approved Plans O Separation Reguest $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retainlng walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already apprwed by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee For Offiae Use Only: Fee Paid: Check No,:By:- DRBApplication Date: Planner: No.: Project No.: Buildino Materials PROPOSED MATERIATS Tvoe of Material Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting Other /pl4tPrr.A- <+rnu"Yfr>%w ff.*tAV.tol14e tlo*'l.eV CftA'fb ',llr'ft.ti - f pfr,stOf'+np- gbws Nft VHft,fr4I.*tJo ?Nt?- Cf12Sp. IXo ceit* WIIA ' Lwyt^tt.^ cu, $ur ?ttlu - Aturt*.c{ o(ut l/il1* f '. €wc 9 z,ra ,, o hL4ohlc- vt6t{.#4q-tr lucnc*q Color ?^Etrl ptl,i,t* - F*wutt lw 60Q L,tuld FWt(?r*ls'txa e* llto** fl2rrg,us9 {LL i{ae/.il IBU L*,e .18t4- h+*m ftL,/. @ 4ttlft- - ,gen+,+t" ltttr rta+4A flts> wl Fl:s|7tp htttt I +iltiilt )1attT, ilF dl fli;,r'&N$t Notes: Please specify the manufacturert name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. catrt4f,trt vq '|rrl d, gpo Page 6 of 12102107102 E Existing and proposed contour lines. Retaining walls shall be included with the top of wall and the bottom of wall elevations noted. Architectural Floor Plans : o Scale of 1/8" = 1'or larger; 1/4" is preferred a Floor'plans of the proposed development drawn to scale and fully dimensioned. Floor plans and building elevations must be drawn at the same scale, a Clearly indicate on the flogy plans the.inside face of the g4erior.slfu+ural walls of the building.o Label floor plans to indicate the proposbd floor area usb (i,e,'ttedroom, kitchen, etc.).o One €9! of flq91 plans must be "red-linedi',indicating how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was calctr'lated...See Tillq 1?, chapter 15 - Gross Residential Flgo.r'Arga ler regulations, .. o. Provide dimensioriS gf.All roof eaves and overhangs. . '- i;1 t,-,'1 ',f , '1. -. "i...' 'l'"r:' Architectural Elevations: o Scale of 1/8" = I' or larger; 1/4" is preferred u All elevations of the proposed development drawn to scale and fully dimensioned. The elevation 't .r .,,'dnlVings'mustshow both existing and finished gradesi.Floor plans and building elevations must be drawn at the same scale.n If building faces are proposed at angles not represeqtpd,.well on the normal building elevations, show these faces also, D Elevations sha{l s[our proposed finished eleyation of floprS and roofs on all levels. 3 All exterior materials and colors shall be specified on the elevations. .a,. Thq folloyrling,5hall.he.shown graphically and fully dimensioned: .fascia, trim, railings, chimney caps," metbr locaticjhs, and window details. f, Show all propqqgd e6terior lighting fixtures on the.building. r Illustrate all d6cks, porches and balconies.! ' i''r " D . .hdicate the roof and building drainage system (i.e. gutters and downspouts). 'l'.'o''fhOtcatt.dll rooftoBrmechanicll systems j;O an itn*ntoOl structurei iflapplicable. f, Illustrate proposed building height elevation on roof lines and ridges. These elevations should coordinate with thefinlshed floor elevations and the dafurn usedfor tlie survey.D Exterior color and material samples shall be submitted to staff and presented at the Design Review Board meeting Lighting Plan: , , 1:! f.. .lt , .D Indicate type, location and number of fixtures,o Iplqde height abore grade, lumens outpuj, lumir\ous area, u Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture. II, IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) o Basis of bearing and tie to section cornero All property pins found or seto Building location(s) with ties to property corners (ie. distances and angles) o Building dimensions, including decks and balconies, to the nearest tenth of a foot u Building and garage floor elevations and all roof ridge and eave line elevationsr All drainage and utility service line as-builts, showing type of material, size and exact locationB All easements Page 5 of l2lO2lOTlOz I PROPOSED LANDSCAPING Common Name .t AsfteJ h.igh0o H)fi. YW tatwttz lvutt/ Botanical Name PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS alW frq.t'''t 16 -( nn+u*)t Ouantitv 4-1, c*tt* 3 6'Ahu EXIfiNG TREES TO BE REMOVED IA*WqJ 5 Minimum Requirements for Landscaping:Deciduous Trees - 2" C-aliper Coniferous Trees - 6' in heiqht Shrubs - 5 Gal. Square FootaoeTvpe lJttXpO tc*AGROUND COVER soD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL Please specify other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc,) PageT of L2lO2lO7lO2 o UTILITY This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verifo service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utili$ plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification . - Authorized Siqnature. . I Comments APPROVAL & VERIFICATION Date !'i EXCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) Contact: Rich Sisneros HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC 970.949.5892 (tel) 970.949.a556 (fax) Contact: Ted Husky EXCEL ENERGY 970.252.4038 (fax) Contacts: Kit Bogart 97 0.262.4024 Jim O'neal 970.262.4003 EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.476.7480 (Iel) 970.476.4089 (fax) Contact: Fred Haslee COMCAST CABLE 970.949.L224 x 112 (tel) 970.949.9138 (fax) Contact: Floyd Salazar NOTES: ,'r. 1. If the utility approval & verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments are made directly on the form, the Town will presume that there are no problems and the development can proceed. 2, If a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative shall note directly on the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve identified problems. 3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way Permit from the Department of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utilitv locations must be obtained before diqoing in any public right-of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not a Public Way peBnlt and must be .' obtained seoaratelv, The Developer is required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date (unless otherwise specifically noted within the comment area of this form). Developer's Signature Date KRM coNSULTA*r? '*.. l]: P.O, Box 4572 cALcuLAlEo evlQH-- oer. -E-/J5-/.9!-Voil, Colorodo 81658 cHEcKED By DATE (970) 949-9391 scru----V4l-=-139 Fox (970) 9+9-1577 E. LrJ F_ L.JJ() z.a EH-1 58= ,ntr-2 z Ft! E. E. UJOJ _) m J 0- F o 5-:oEJo-I- F+?H lritr?5 :a? ai 3b,:: 32r, 5=H iE-:f;ffi 4H= ug: 5F€ gS?* 'lgr,tr=? dEE #[=e.. ;E: et H:;=Ei =5=[= 3;5 olzl; N ro + tlJ e2 SF ffd .Yg6 F_atv LLE _Ldt)'7 -tLrJia ;6 9@<E(rtd()(L z (o 6'-0" MAX. Vlrztp These fixhlres have been manufactured for indoor/outdoor application, and are consiructed ot solid Brass. 4000 4001 4002 4003 4004 400s 4006 4007 4008 400&c 4009 4009< FLUSH MOUNT WALL BRACKET (st\4Atll WALL BRACKET {MEDIUM) WALL BRACKET ITARGE} WALL BMCKET WARM ISMALL} WALL BRACKET W/ARM {LARGE} HANGING PENDANT (SMALL' HANGING PENDANT (LARGEI POST MOUNT {SMALI-I coLUMN MOUNT (StvlALLl POST MOUNT {IARGEI I t" 6" 9' 7" 9" 7" 9" 7' 9' 9" tt 1/2" 4l/2" 2 I I I I I I I I I I 60 ea MED I OO MED I OO MED I OO MED I OO MED I OO MED I OO MED I OO MED I OO MED IOO MED I OO MED I OO MED tt' ll" l2' I t" lz I l" 9" t3" 11' 5' to" 10" Alt fixn res shown available in several tinishes and glass ch0ices at n0 additional ciarge. See page 29 for standard samples. Custom sizes and finishes arailable. Altwnative light sources available on nnst fixtures. Please consult factory for pricing and availability. 984t over opa ltscent side andbottom 6lass rn t-libht. t00-w. {M}Dia. q. Hst. U2'. U.L. listeat lor damp location. Canyon Vievl' \ 98{6 GY Canyon Vienf over Sqlid Brass Honey,,bpalescent side and bottom glass panelsr 1-light, 100-W Max. (M) Dia.8', Body Hgty'16',0verall 54', Eqtra lead wirF I l2'. For additiondl chain order N0.2996 CV. U.L llsted Iji damn location. @l \, t,/\ \ \ \ 9945 CV C{tyonVieul' over Solid Enss ', Honey opTlescent glass\panels. l-light, lS-W. Max. (MlDia. 11 -1 12', fSt. 1 2-112". H gt. When convefed to pier mountedrfixture I l-Uf. Post not included. !.Llist/ for wet location. El \, /\. Hy'ney opalescent glass$anels. t/tigtrt, tso-w. Max. (M) Width I l-t flgt l3', Extension 13-l/z'\Hgt from center of wall opening 3'. tjS. listed for wet location. F \\ \ \ opalescent glasspanels. 'r50-w. Max. (M) Width lr-Vr, Tularosa 96{5 CV Canyon View' over Solid Bns Honey opalescent glass panels. l-light, 100-W. Max. (M) Width 6', Hgt. 13-l/Z', Extension 9-l/2". Hgt. {rom center of waf l opening 2-11T. U.L.listed for wet location. @l 96{6 CV Canyon Vievl" over Solid Brass Honey opalescent glass panels. 1-light, 100-W. Max. (M) Width 8', Hgt. l7', Extensio n 11-U2'. Hgt. from center of wall opening 3'. U.L. listed lor wet location. B 96f/cv Canyon Vief ovdr Solid Bnss \. 348 KICHLER' Ouncr Architcct Zonc district Lot sizc Pbonc Pbonc hoposcd usc Allorvcd rotatGRFA 4lL+ =_3frlL_ + 6'7 5 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition Existin e Proposcd * L18 = Total Rcmaining ffi4 =c_t + Zo"l" 1,13q * l,9BBt= l,g$ I i 6ot:iil Sidcs Rcar .l s' l5' Caragc Crcdit Drivcrvay Conrplics wirb TOV Liebting Ord.inancc Arc finishcd gradcs lcss than 2:l (5020) Enr.i ronm cn tat4lazards Minimum [0% gq{s - 6LfF,d ^6?"Ej -_ 3',t6' r t D RequircdS 5 3 rHctoscd Goo)@l(eoo).(r2oo) 4 qll Pcrmittcd Slopc -fr ol" proposcd Sl"p, Zg 6 % ,/Ycs Y'-:-- ',.Ycs r' No-_- No 5) Geologic Hazards a) SnorvAvalanchc b) Rocldall c) Dcbris Florv Prcvious conditions ofapproval (chcck propcrty filc); Docs this rcqucst involvc a 2j0 Addjtion? fl a Horv much.of tbc allorvcd 250 Addition is uscd wirh this rcoucst? Sitc Covcralc Hcigbt Sctback Fron t ', 20. Landscaping Rctaining Wall Hciglrts Parking Is thc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc: ilO DESIGN REVIE1Y CIIECKLIS T .'i\of,.Lr' riFifl EHU .-.t93if Q sUR\TEY .Sgalct,.. .".i. ,.' Bcnchmuk Lcgal dcscription Lot Sizc,_t. iJ.. Buildablc Area Eascmcnts Topogaphy I00 yr. flood plain Watcr Counc Sctback .1r i..t Environmenhl l{azards ,r ri 3qP,,. I tees tsF Utility Iocations Spot clcvations Q SITEPLA}.I !q+*.;botq ti':-l:'':'.' t :. Building Hcight . F Encroachm"riiii s.tbaFt$, f,,i ,: .|nF Sitc Covcrage -r\. .:if:F{'r: ir':..iil-u r{-qqfP4NS.+ e'r'ii i\ .' -.. rlf .r"r,f.*ies'r'. CRFA 250 a{fifoqal GRFA' iiP'*r -- Crarvl\Attic Spacc -,I Ih*r ir . 1'9"ltt.'t !r ;,,.'*-, . a BUrLDrNcELbvATroNs Scala I-, 1,, ColorMatgrials-- Roofpitch f;$o '1tr r''f rr, ,r "E f.Irosclpgpuqw f"t Existing tccs Proposcd tccs Lcgcnd ::i,f .:.{ftsa+Lr-Alrrous EavcVOvcrhangs (4) Decks/tsalconics cod&iiincurion ;/l Sitc Cradc\Slopc --', RchiafgglVaUs Fcoccs' Parking/Garagc TumingRadius Drivcrvay (access and gndc) )J e' Snow Storagc FircAcccss Condo Approval Titlc rcport (A & B) Utility.vuif cation form Photos ofsitc Building mataial sarnplcs 9.O. Ycrification Sur\ShadcAnglcs Utilitics (undcrground) Vierv Corridors Varianccs Plat rcstictions f i-- lrii ++ * * * +* *t* *** * *t 't + * f*ta*+***+t****** *+ * * t ** * * + +*'t* ** * * + tt +++ t'*'**r' *+*** ** * ** t * * | * t * {' *{r{t* t ** t * TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Copy Reprinted on 03-16-2004 rt 0E:46:09 03116/2004 Statement * ***** +** + * * l' {'* ** * ** +** t * + + * | * f * * * * * * * **** **** * * + + t ***t* +** | + + * +*t' f * ** * + +t + *++** *'lr'} *'l | + *+ I' i I Statement Nurnber : R040005494 Anount : $550. 0003/16 / 2OO4O8. 4s AITI Pa].ment ltletshod: Check Init: DM Notation: # 2L45 Permit No:DR8040075 rype: DRB - New Conatruct.ion Parcel No 3 2103123 07028 Site AddreEE: O W EORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: 1936 IIEST GORB CRBBK DRIVE Total Fees : $6s0.00 ThiB Payment,: $550.ooTotal AIJL PntB: $650.00 Balance 3 $0.00 * +** * * t* * * * * **t * f* '|t t t + + + **** t *'a'|{.* ** * ** * * * 'ir I l' | * 't'|'* * + * * * * {' * * * **** * +**** +* * * * * * * * * + * *'t * i * t * {' | * ACCOI,JNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Descri pti on Current Pmts DR 00i00003112200 REVIEt,|l FEES 650.00 DESIGN January 8,2002 To: AllisonOehs From: Paul Jardis Attached is a proposed final plat for the resubdivision of Lot 1, Stauss Subdivision that was receirtly ryroved and which I understand you handled. I obtaincd title to this property tbrough foreclosure and would now like to proceed with the resubdivision. Please rer"iew the proposed plat and advise ifthere are any changes that are required. I canbe reachcd as follows: Workphone 949-5995 ril/ork fax 949-5881 Home phone 748-1500 Home fa,x 748-1551 Work email pjardi@r*'eststarbank.com Homc email j ardis@vail.net Thanks for your assistance with this. Planning and Environmental Commission ACTION FORM Department of Cornmunity Development 75 Sorlth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 web: wwwci.vail.co.us Project llame: Struass Subdivision PEC t{umber: PE@10033 Proiect Description: Minor subdivision and variance to allow for the recreation of Lots 45,47 Yail Participants: OWNER STMUSS, RICHARD & CAROUNE Ml27l2OOI Phone: PO BOX 1810 VAIL CO 816s8 License; APPUCANT Pat Dauphinais 0412il200L Phone: 476-8055 Box 1515 Vail, Co 81657 License: ProjectAddrces: 191SWGORECREEKDRVAIL Locauon: Legal Description: LoE 1 Blodc Subdlvision: STMUSS SUBDIVISION Parcel l{umberz 2103L23O7027 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACnOil Motion By: John Schofreld Action: APPROVED Saoond By: Chas Bernhart Vote: 6-0 Dateof APprcvalz O6l28l2OOL Conditions; Cond: 8 (P|AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate revie\,\, committee(s). Cond: CON0004837 That the applicant submit 2 mylar copies of the final plat with all required signatures for Lots 46 &.47 , Vail Village West Filing 2, fior recording of the subdivision within one year from the date of approval. Planner: Allison Ochs PEC Fee Paid: $250.00 ao Department of Commuity Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2 r 38 FAX 970-479-2452 www.ci.vail.co.tu May 17,2001 Pat Dauphinais PO Box 1515 Vail, CO 81657 RE: Dauphinais Residence to be located al 1936 West Gore Creek Dr. / Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing No. 2 Dear Pat: The Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the Dauphinais Residence to be located at 1936 West Gore Creek Dr. at their May 16th meeting. The following wdre their comments and concerns: 1. There needs to be additional detailing on the garages to break them up. This could be accomplished through the addltion of windows, using vertical siding, varying the color, or some sort of decorative elemenl. Use wood trim around the windows and doors instead of the stucco. Because of the expanse of the deck on the front fagade, there needs to be additional detailing of the rails or flower boxes. The "pop out" needs to actually pop out a minimum of 4 in. Bring the front entry out to the plane of the wall above. Bring the corlcels out trom the sided area (in the middle) and away from the 2. 3. 4. o. corner (on the outside wall area). Please submit a complete applicalion and plans by Monday, May 21"t, if you wish to be on the June 6m Design Review Board agenda. Their lollowing meeting is June 20th. The submittal deadline for that date is May 28'n. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 970-479-2369. Sincerelv.tte{' Allison Ochs Planner ll Town of Vail {sonotoruo ,1 ,ry coMMtssto oo PLAN NING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS Monday, June 11,2001 PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Community Devetopment Dept. PUBLtc WELCOME ')I 12:00 pm I MEMBERS PRESENT Galen Aasland Chas Bemhardt Diane Golden John Schofield Doug Cahill Dick Cleveland Site Msits : MEMBERS ABSENT Brian Doyon 1:15 pm 1. Vail Maniott - 715 West Lionshead Circle2. Collins residence - 1115 Homsilver Circle Driver:George NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 Public Hearinq - Town Council Ghambers 2:00 pm 1. A report of a slaff decision, approving a minor amendmenl to the approved development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, allowing for lhe expansion of the Wreck Room ilestaurant and Passport Club, locited at 4b8 VailValiey Drive/Trast F, VailVillage srh Filing. Applicant: Golden Peak Ski BasePlanner: Ann Kjerulf STAFF DECISION UPHELD 2. A request for a conditional use permit, lo allow for the construction of an athletic field, located at 610 N. Frontage Rd. WesU A portion of Tract C, Vail Potato Patch. A full metes & bounds legal description is available at the Department of Community Development. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Allison Ochs TABLED TO JUNE 25, 2OO1 3. A request for the review of a proposed text amendment to Chapter 11, Design Review, of the Zoning Regulations to allow for procedural changes to the performance bond process as prescribed in the Vail Town Code. Applicant Town of VailPlanner: George Ruther/Russell Fonest TABLED TO JUNE 25,2001 4. A requesl for a minor subdivision and a variance from Section 12-6D-5 of the Town Code, to allow for the resubdivision of Lot 1, Strauss Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 46 & 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2, re-creating Lots 46 & 47 , located at 1916 & 1936 West Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Pat Dauphinais, representing Richard StraussPlanner: Allison Ochs MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Chas Bernhardl VOTE: 6-0 APPROVED WITH TWO CONDITIONS: 1 . That the applicant submit 2 mylar copies of the final plat for Lot 46 and 47 , Yarl Village West Filing No. 2, for recording of the subdivision. The plat must be recorded within one year or final Planning and Environmental Commission approval.2. That the applicant review the final plat with the Town Atlorney to verify ownership. 5. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the consolidation of 2 units within the CC2 Zone District, located at 126 Willow Bridge Road/Lot K, Block 5E, Vail Village 1d Filing. Applicant: Henry Anthony lttleson, represenled by K.H. Webb Architects. Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Chas Bemhardt VOTE:6-0 APPROVED 6. A request for a conditional use permil, to allow for a seasonal struclure within the Lionshead Mixed Use I Zone District, located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3'd Filing and Lots C & D, Morcus Subdivision. Applicant: Vail MarriottPlanner: Allison Ochs MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE:6-0 APPROVED WITH THREE GONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant shall not erecl the tent prior to April 3Oth and the applicant shall remove the tent no later than October 31d of each summer of operation.2. That the approval is good for one year and must be renewed prior to April 2002.3. That the applicant repair the fence, screen all mechanical equipment & generally clean up the site. 7. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage), Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of an addition 1o a single-family residence, located at 1 115 Homsilver Circle / Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village 8rh Filing. Applicant: Carol Collins, represented by Anis West Architects, PC Planner: Bill Gibson MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Chas Bernhardt YOTE: 4-2 (Cahill, Cleveland opposed) APPROVED L A request for a minor subdivision, to allow for the conection of enors in the platting of Tract J, Vail Village First Filing, located at Vail Interfaith Chapel, 19 Vail Road / Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Brent Wilson MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Dick Ctevetand VOTE: &0 APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION 1. That the applicant records the approved and signed plat with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorde/s Office by no later ihan June 11, 2002. . L A request for a work session to discuss amending certain residential zone districts in the Town of Vail to allow home day care facilities subject to the issuance of a conditional use permii and a home occupation permit. Applicant: Town of VailPlannen George Ruther MOTION: Diane Golden SEGOND: Chas Bemhardt VOTE:6-0 TABLED UNTIL JUNE 25,2001 10. A request for a variance from Section 12-6DO (Setbacks), Vail Town Code, to allow forthe construction of a garage within the required fronl setback, localed at 1956 Gore Creek Drive / Lot 45, Vail Village West Filing #2. Applicant: David InryinPlanner: Ann Kjerulf MOTION: Diane Golden SECOND: Chas Bemhardt VOTE:6-0 TABLED UNTIL JUNE 25,2001 11. Approval of May 14,2001 minules 12. Informaiion Updater June 19rh roofing materials discussion with the PEC, Town Council & DRB. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Deparlment, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Community Development Department ?0!$ffi GENEML INFORMATION This application is for any project requiring approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission. For specific information, see the submittal requirements for the particuiar approval that is requested. The application can not be accepted until all required information is submitted. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Design Review Board. Questiorf the Ptanning Staff at 479-2138 APPLIC.ATION FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION APPROVAL A. TYPE OF APPLICATION:n Bed and Ereakfusttl Conditional Use Permitn Major or [[ Minor Subdivisionn Rezoningtr Sign Variancetr Special Development DistrictO Major or tr Minor Amendment to SDD Empioyee Housing Unit (Iype: _) Major or n Minor Exterior Alteration (Vaii Village) Major or Minor E*erior Alteration (Lionshead) Variance Zoning Code Amendment Amendment to an Approved Development Plan A requeat for a nlnor subdlvi.sl-on and varlance froo aLlov for the recreation of Lots 46 & 47, YaLl Village tr tr ! F tr n B. DESCRTT|IONOFTHEREQUEST: Section 12-6IF5 to Ileet Plllag No.2. c. D. F. H. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT: I BLOCK: pHySICALADDpg55; 1916 E 1936 llest core Strausa Subdlvision Creek Drlve PARCEL *: 2IO3-L23-O7O27 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessors Office at 97S328-8640 for parcel #) ZONING: Prtnaqy/Secondary Reeidential- NAME OF OWNER(S):Elcbard Strausa MAIUT\G ADDRFSS: 1916 tlest Gore Creek Drive OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S): NAME OF ApPUCANT: Pat Dauphlnals, representlng the owner MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1515, VaLl-, Cnlorado 81657 pHONE: 970476-8055 FEE: See submithl requiranen9 for appropnate fee PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPUCATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMEI{T OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO E1657, rrr++*'rr'tt+r.r.r*r**lD*r*rf ++'rrr*+**+.rrrrl***rr***r**.f r***rl+*r'r+.****f fr* TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Satmenttlt*tl*ll*t**'rtftl*tttltatt'ttt**rttt****+lt****,r****'r**t*tat*tr*r**it*itt't*t+ft'tttt'tttfatit* Etetcmcnt lnlnber: R0OoOOO643 Anpunt: g25O.OO 04/27/2OOLOI:10 At{ Pal@ent llethod: Cheek Intt : iIAR llotation r 10302 Petmit tfo: 98C010033 Type ! PBC - }|fnor Subdlvlalon Parcel !lo: 2LO3L23O?O27 Site Addresg: 1916 tl GoRE CRBBK DR \'AIIJ Locatlon: Total Pecs: $25o.00 Ttrl6 Palment: 9250,00 Total AIJtrJ Rnts, 9250.00 Balence: S0.00*+l'iflttt'tltltt**t'tlt*llli*'rtra*l'|lllf*+**r***al*l*a:trr*tlltaatt*lltttlllftlft*'3t*tllll*ltl*a ACCOUNT ITEIvILIST: Account Code Descriotion Current ffis PV 001()()()()31125()() PEC APPLICATIOI{ FEES 250.00 Pat Dauphinias Dauphinias-Mosely Construction P.O. Box 1515 Vail, Colorado 81657 May 14,2001 Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: A request for a minor subdivision and a variance from Section l2-6D-5 ofthe Vail Town Code to allow for the resubdivision oflot I, Strauss Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 46 & 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2, re-creating Lots 46 &47 , located at 1916 & 1936 West Gore Creek Drive. Dear Planning & Environmental Commission Memben, I am requesting approval ofa minor subdivision ofan existing lot and variance to allow for the re-creation of two lots once legally platted and located within the Town ofVail. The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate how Mr. Strauss received incorrect information regarding the need to subdivide his property in 1990 and how this proposal for a minor subdivision and variance request each comply with the applicable review criteria. The Vail Village West Filing No. 2 subdivision was platted and approved by the Eagle County Board of Commissioners in 1965. In 1986, the Town of Vail annexed the subdivision into the Town's corporate limits. Upon approval of the annexation, the Town of Vail zoned Lots 46 & 47, along with all the other lots in the subdivision, Two Fanily Primary/Secondary Residential. The minimum lot size in the Two Family Primary/Secondary Residential District was I 5,000 square feet with a confrguration capable of enclosing a square measuring 80' X 80'. Richard Strauss received an approval of a minor zubdivision of Lots 46 & 47 in 1990 . The approval eliminated the comnon lot line between Lots 46 & 47 and created a new Lot 1. According to the documentation in the Town's files, Mr. Strauss requested the minor subdivision at the direction of the Town of Vail Community Development Department as the solution to an on-street, parking in the rigbt-of-way problert. On January 2, 1990, the Community Development Department sent a letter to Mr. Strauss stating that a "parking lot" was not allowed in the Two Family Primary/Secondary Resldential zone distict. At that time, the staff was recommending that Mr. Strauss submit an amendment to the allowable uses section of the zone district to include "parking lots". On December 10, 1990, the Com:nunity Development Departrnent presented a memorandum to the Planning & Environmental Commission in response to a minor subdivision request submitted by Mr. Strauss. In Section I of that memorandun, the staffstates that'larking" is only permitted as an accessory urc to a residence. Staff further state s that, "By combining Lot 47, which contains a single family residence, with Lot 46, which is vacant, additional parking can be placed on Lot 46." The infonnation and direction provided by the Community Development Departrnent in 1990 was incorrect. Section l2-2-2 of the Town ofVail Zoning Regulations defines a "lot or site" as, "A parcel of land occupied or intended to be occapied by a use, building, or structure under the provisions of this Title and meeting the minimum requirements of this Title. A lot or site may consist of a single lot of record, s portion ofa lot of record, a combination of lots of record or portions thereoJ or a parcel of land described by metes and bounds. " This definition has not been amended since 1990. According to the above-described definition, it was not necessary for Mr. Strauss to eliminate the common lot line to achieve his desired results ofproviding additional parking for his residence. A timely example of how this definition has been correctly interpreted and implemented is the Vail Valley Medical Center proposal before the Plaruring & Environmental Commission today. The medical center is located on Lots E & F. The surface parking area for the hospital is located primarily on Lot E, while the hospital is located on Lot F and no subdivision eliminating the common property line is required. There are other examples as well (Gasthof Gramshamrner, Beaver Dam residences, A&D Building, May residence, etc.). The minor subdivision and variance requests comply with the prescribed criteria for review. The request for a variance from the minimum lot size requirement is not a grant of special privilege. According to the Town's files, the vast majority of the existing lots in the Vail Village West Filing No. 2 subdivision do not meet the minimum lot size requirements. If the variance is not approved, Mr. Strauss will be held to a higher standard with regard to lot size (21,083 sq. ft.) than the other owners in the vicinity. The average lot size in the subdivision is approxinately 12,000 sq. ft. in size. There are exceptions, exmordinary circumstances and conditions applicabie to Mr. Strauss' lot that do not apply to other properties in the zone district and the subdivision. Unlike other properties in the zone district, the subdivision and the Towq lvfr. Strauss was required to eliminate a common lot line when it was not necessary. Additionally, if approved the resulting lots would be of similar size and configuration as the other lots legally platted. In this case, Mr. Strauss is asking to re-create two lots as they once existed. Mr. Strauss is requesting the minimum amount ofdeviation from the applicable regulations by requesting that the lots be recreated exactly as they existed. The strict interpretation of the minimum lot size and site dimension regulations deprives the applicant of privileges enjoyed by others in the im:nediate area. As previously stated, the average lot size ofplatted lots within the subdivision is approximately 12,000 sq. ft.. Each of these lots is zoned Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential allowing for two dwelling units per lot. An approval of this request rightfirlly re-establishes the applicant's ability to construct two dwelling units on each lot in accordance with the applicable land use regulations (GMA, site coverage, building height, setbacks, parking etc.). The minor subdivision application is appropriate in regard to the Town's policies relating to densities proposed, regulations, environmental integrity, cornpatibility with surrounding land uses, and the effects on the aesthetics of the Town. The proposed density allowed is two dwelling units per lot with a maximum of 25 square feet of GRFA for each 100 square feet of lot area plus applicable credits (425, garage & EHQ. The integrity of the environment is notjeopardized as the proposed re-creation ofthe two lots is as originally platted and within an already developed area ofTown (in-fill). Future development on the vacant lot is compatible with surrounding land uses as the lot remains zoned Two Family Primary/Secondary Residential. Currently, the existing and potential uses in the vicinity oflots 46 & 47 are all residential in nature. The residential densities vary between single family, duplex and multi-family. Lastly, the aesthetics of the lots are subject to the site development standards (Title 14) and design guidelines (Chapter I l) already adopted by the Town of Vail. AgairL I am requesting an approval ofa minor subdivision and variance to allow for the recreation of Lots 46 & 47 within the Vail Village West Filing No. 2 subdivision. An approval is appropriate as the purpose of the application is to correct an error from the past and, more importantly, because the request complies with the criteria prescribed for requests of this nature. (f) q) ct(g o-JloYitmvlin :r iri f.f .teIto Cl s c J-BIgnog 3 E*UOto iu$ €q9p3e ^$ $tr; n-dl3 -tIf;: $fito $;fis $.gili f ef s9 -El; ;LJJ5 q { t 0l $ \i J fi fg f; s_: e!lo.g(LN ilt E$ g0 $$ CpT 5 b ..!g o li,{on -ffi: rEII s€ JF T l-oJ L.r- dsi {. €. b,R H,- ft5U -9.rir d;g $-I$^tlP:iiqB;d I $ i= il6g- -* '.d 'U€;i s e?$;l Eg n is$9 -E s ,g' g=;s .a,'i Ilg\=* t a,\ {\ \>\do;;\ ? R\{u*3 r$r q ei\r<: rloYit6ni{i T biFTrf cf) q) ot$(L vt^sfi =E 3go rl1o e- o (.) '{ 7 E d J D 8'r$ s_?[l is d $>:..irIFJE oE" -E t $fr09.0v, **&to +o- st* j- ld$, rri I f+ur'l$s i u.i "} l:t$: I ;t* ei$ri :"Hn 5,!gt ? -E s ,f' s f,aruo :xtcrv dak I* l'$ gq9 E3s f5p*iX""\ nE)Q r.( ! 'l i: 6z 2z- z 6 6l! u) ulzd F prYerS ffi:g3g€ { g $$.tr ; .i, .il; ifu;ihrb\JJJ e: l!- E,cl i<\ \ \iEI \\ -ilio \F't,,.\ -, D .{r\ F.,6" E - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL t I * rrEM MAy AFFE.T youR pRott PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on May 14,2001, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for an addition to the Vail Valley Medical Center, located at 181 Welst Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represenled by Braun AssociatesPlanner: George Ruther A request for a variance from Title 14 (Development Standards), Vail Town Code, to allow for snow storage and parking within the public rightof-way, located aI2437 Garmisch Drive / Lot 12, Block H, Vail das Schone 2no Filing. Applicant: William H. Mentlik, represented by John Martin, AIAPlanner: Ann Kjerulf A request for a work session to discuss amending certain residential zone districts in the Town of Vail to allow home day care facilities subject to the issuance of a conditional use permil and a home occupation permit. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: George Ruther A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 (Setbacks), Vail Town Code, to allow forthe construction of a garage within the required front selback, located at 1956 Gore Creek Drive / Lot 45, VailVillage West Filing #2. Applicant David InryinPlanner: Ann Kjerulf A request for a worksession to discuss a new special development distric't, to allow for the redevelopment of the Vail Racquet Club, located at 4695 Vail Racquet Club Drive/Vail Racquet Club Condominiums, Bighorn srh Addition. Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architests.Planner: Brent Wilson A request for a final review of a proposed special development district, to allow for the construction of a new conference facility/hotel; and a final review of a conditional use Permit, to allow for Type lll employee housing units and fractional fee club units, located at 13 Vail Road/ Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 2. Applicant: Doramar Hoiels, represented by the Daymer CorporationPlanner: Brent Wilson A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of a soccer field, locaied 610 N. Frontage Rd. WesU A portion of Tract C, Vail Potato Patch. A full metes & bounds legal description is available at the Department of Community Development. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, to ailow for the construction of Phase I of Donovan Park improvements, generally located southeast of the intersection of Matterhom Circle and the South Fronlage Road. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: George Ruther A request for the review of a proposed text amendment to Chapter 1 1, Design Review, of the Zoning Regulations to allow for procedural changes to the performance bond process as prescribed in the Vail Town Code. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: George Ruther A request for a variance from Section 12-6D.10 of the Town Code, to allow for a redustion in the landscaping and site development requirements, located at 383 Beaver Dam Road/Lol 3, Block 3, Vail Village 3'd Filing. Applicant: A2Z Holdings, LLCPlanner: Bill Gibson A request for a minor subdivision and a variance from Section 12-6D-5 of lhe Town Code to af f ow for the resubdivision of Lot 1 , Strauss Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 46 & 47 , Yail Village West Filing No. 2, re-creating Lots 46 & 47,located at 1916 & 1936 West Gore Creek lDrive.w:tPIHfpplicant: Pat Dauphinais, representing RichardStrauss - Flanner: Allison Ochs The applicaiions and information about the proposals are available for public inspec-tion during regular office hours in the project plannels office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientalion and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Communily Development Department. Pfease call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interprelation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Community Development Department Published April27,2001 in lhe Vail Trail. Oqrr,,' o!,fi/ N'tA* r. {wn Aatr.*yry*t t . frrVut*lnullU 'tdi" Wku Y,ih MPtil/.Ir^ A- o tfiaatmad *d?tve tiuwu lrilun- wiwl(rr{x,nffir*w1 t A request for a minor subdivision and a variance from Section 12-6D-5 of the Town Code to allow for lhe resubdivision of Lot 1, Strauss Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 46 & 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2, re-creating Lots 46 & 47, localed at 1916 & 1936 West Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Richard Strauss, represented by Pat DauphinaisPlanner: Allison Ochs DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, Richard Strauss, represented by Pal Dauphinais, is requesting a minor subdivision lor Lol 1, Strauss Subdivision, to recreate Lots 46 and 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2. This minor subdivision request also requires a variance from Section 12- 6D-5 Lof Area and Site Dimensions. The minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. Lot 47 would be 1 '1,151 sq. ft. and would not be able to enclose a square area 80 ft. by 80 ft. Lot 46, would be 9,932 sq. ft. and would meet the site dimension requiremenl (capable of enclosing a square area 80 ft. by 80ft.). MINOR SUBDIVISION Pursuant to the Town Code, a minor subdivision is defined as: "Minor subdivision" shall mean any subdivision containing not more than four (4) lots fronting on an existing street, not involving any new street or road or the ertension of Municipal facilities and not adversely aftecting the development of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property. VARIANCE According to the Section 12-6D-5 of the Town Code, 12-6D-5: LOT AREA AND S|TE DIMENSIONS; The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty teet (30'). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet (80') on each side, within its boundaries. Vail Village West Filing No.2 was originally subdivided in Eagle County in 1965. The Town of Vail annexed the area in the early 1980s, de-annexed in 1985, and r+annexed in 1986. In 1985, a variance was granted to add a garage in the front setback, allowing for a 5 fl. front setback, one parking space in the right-of-way, and a site coverage variance to allow lor 24o/" site coverage. In December of 1990, the applicanl requested a minor subdivision lo vacate the lol line between Lols 46 and 47, Vail Village West Fif ing No. 2. The applicant has an existing residence on Lot 47, where lhe Town issued TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Deparlment of Community Development June 11, 2001 il. a Home Occupation Permil. The applicant purchased Lot 46 and proposed to pave a portion of Lot 46 for additional parking. The Community Development Departmenl denied the proposal, stating that parking is allowed only as an accessory use to a residence in the Primary/Secondary zone district. Subsequently, the applicant applied for a minor subdivision to vacale the lot line between Lots 46 and 47. The minor subdivision and the proposed parking area on Lot 46 were lhen approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION MINOR SUBDIVISON The Community Development Department recommends denial of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the following findings: 1. That the application is not in compliance with the inlenl and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations, the Zoning Ordinance and olher pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable. 2. That the application is nol appropriate in regard to Town policies relating 1o subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, environmenlal integrity and compatibilily with lhe surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, and effects on the aesthetics of the Town. VARIANCE The Community Development Department recommends denial of the variance from Section 12-6D-5, VailTown Code, subject to lhe following findings: 1. That the granting of the variance will constitule a grant of special inconsistenl with the limitations on other properties classified Primary/Secondary zone district. 2. The stiict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficully or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Subdivision Regulations. 3. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do nol apply generally 1o other properties in the Single Family Residential Zone District. 4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same dislrict. Should the Planning and Environmenlal Commission choose to grant the variance request and minor subdivision request, staff recommends the following condition: 1. Thal the applicant submit 2 mylar copies of the final plat for Lol 46 and 47, Yail Village West Filing No. 2, for recording of the subdivision. The plat must be recorded within one year or final Planning and Environmental Commission approval. privilege in the tv. ilt.ZONING ANALYSIS MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW CRITERIA One basic premise ol subdivision regulations is that the minimum standards for the creation of a new lot must be met. The first set ol review criteria to be considered by the PEC for a minor subdivision application is as follows: A. Lot Area The minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. of buildable area. As proposed, Lot 46 would be 9,932 sq. ft., with 5,494 sq. fi. of buildable area. Lot 47 would be 11,151 sq. ft. Because there is an existing residence on Lot 47, the applicant did not survey the lot for buildable area. The Planning and Environmental Commission has the ability 1o waive this requirement for the minor subdivision, if it so chooses. Section V of this memorandum describes the criteria for review of a variance request. B. Frontaoe The minimum frontage in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 30 ft. As proposed, Lot 46 would have 82 ft. of frontage. Lol47 would have 74.5 ft. ot frontage. This proposal complies with this requiremenl. C. Site Dimensions Each site in the Primary/Secondary zone district shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area 80 ft. on each side within ils boundaries. As proposed, Lot 46 complies with this requirement. Lot 47 would not comply wilh this requirement. Section V of this memorandum describes the criteria lor review of a variance request. The second set of review criteria to be considered with a minor subdivision request is as outlined in the Subdivision Regulations, and is as tollows: The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intended purpose of Title 13, Chapter 4, the zoning ordinance, and other pertinent regulations that the PEC deems applicable. The PEC shall review the application and consider its appropriafeness in regard to Town policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, effects on the Development Standard Exlstlng Allowable Existing Proposed Lot 46 Proposed Lot 47 Existlng Lot 47 Mln, Lot Size (bldble area) 15,000 sl 21083 sl 9932 st 1 151 sf 11151 sl Mln Frontage 30f 156.5 I 82t 74.51 74.51 5280 + 250 + 500 (EHU sl 2752si 2908 + 925 (EHU) sl 3213+250+925 (EHU) sl 2752si Site Goveraoe 4217 st 2676 sf 1986 or 2483 (EHU) st 2230 or 2788 (EHU) sl 2676 sf Setbacks 20t't5t't5t15 5/100/15/50 20t15t15t't5 20t15t15/15 5t17t15t50 Landscape (mln) 12650 st 8451 sq. lt.5959 sf 6691 sl 8451 sq. It. Parking Per 12-10 5 soaces Pet 12-1 Per 12-10 3 soaces' Density 2 du + Type ll EHU ldu 1 du + Type I EHU ldu+lTypelEHU ldu 'Received variance to 1 space ir aesthetics of the Town, environmental integrity and compatibility with surrounding uses. The subdivision purpose statements are as follows: 1. To inform each subdivider of the standards and criteria by which development and proposals will be evaluated and to provide information as to the type and exlent ol improvements required. Staff Resoonse: One purpose ol subdivision regulalions, and any development control, is 1o establish basic ground rules which the staff, the Planning and Environmenlal Commission, the applicant and the community can follow in the public review process. This application has been submitted according to the requirements of Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulations. 2. To provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict with development on adjacent properly. Staff Resoonse: The proposed plat does not create any conflicl with development on adjacent land. 3. To protecl and conserve lhe value of land throughoul lhe municipality and the value of buildings and improvements on the land. Staff Resoonse: Staff believes this proposal will not be detrimental to the value of land throughout Vail, nor will it be detrimental to the value of land in the immediale area. 4. To ensure that subdivision ol property is in compliance with the Town Zoning Ordinance, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal developmenl objeclives. Staff Response: The applicanl eliminated the common lot line between Lots 46 and 47 in 1990, eliminating two non-conforming lols. Because the proposed subdivision would re-establish two lots which do not conform lo minimum lot size requirements, staff does nol believe that the subdivision is in compliance with the Town Zoning Ordinance. A variance is necessary, and stalf does not believe the criteria for a variance have been mel (Please refer to Section V of this memorandum.) 5. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational and olher public requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve lhe proposed subdivision. Staff Resoonse: This aspect of the subdivision regulations is intended primarily to address impacts of large-scale subdivisions of property, as opposed to this particular minor subdivision proposal. Staff does nol believe this proposal will have any negative impacls on any of the other above-listed oublic facilities. V. 6. To provide for accurale legal descriptions of newly subdivided land and to establish reasonable and desirable construction, design standards and procedures. Staff Resoonse: This goal of the subdivision regulations will not be impacled by the proposed plat. 7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, and ponds, to assure adequacy of drainage facilities, to safeguard the waler table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the municipality in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauly of the community and the value of land. Staff Resoonse: As proposed, slaff does not believe that the proposed minor subdivision will have any impact on the above referenced goal. VARIANCE CRITERIA A. Consideralion of Factors Reoardino the Variance: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existlng or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. As proposed, staff does not believe that the requested variance will have any impact ol potential uses and slructures in the vicinity. However, at the subject location, the current density allowed is 2 dwelling units plus one EHU for a total of 3 units allowed on sile. As proposed, each lot would be allowed 1 du, plus 1 EHU, for a total of 4 units on site. Staff does not believe that one additional unit on this site will substantially impacl the neighborhood. ln addition, the requested subdivision does not trigger the need for any other variances for the existing house on Lol 47. 2. The degree to which relief trom the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specilied regulation is necessary to achleve compatibllity and uniformity of treatment among sites in the viclnity or to attain the objectives of lhis title without a grant of special privilege. In December of 1990, the owner requested a minor subdivision to eliminale the lot line between lots 46 and 47. By eliminating this lot line, the lot was broughl into compliance with Section 12-6D-5 Lot Area and Site Dimensions. Staff believes that approval of the request would resultin a grant of special privilege. The minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. By granting this variance, the lots would not meet the 15,000 sq. ft. requirement. Because Vail Village West Filing No. 2 was subdivided in Eagle County in 1965, many lots in the neighborhood are nonconforming with regards to lot size. The average lot size in Vail Village West Filing No. 2 is approximately '12,000 sq. ft. The applicant was informed by the Community Development Department in 1990 that it was necessary to eliminate the common lot line if the B. applicanl wished to put additional parking on lot 46. Title 12 of the Town Code defines a lot or site as: A parcel of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a use, buildinQ, or structure under the provisions of this Title and meeting the minimum requirements of this Title. A lot or site may consist ot a single lot of record, a poftion of a lot of record, a combination ot lots of record or poriions thereof, or a parcel of land described by metes and bounds. Because a "lol or sile" may consist of a combinalion of lots, il was unnecessary to eliminate the common lot line to allow for additional parking to be crealed on Lot 46. 3. The eflect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff does not believe thal the requested variance will have any negative imoacts on the above referenced criteria. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before orantino a variance: 1. That the granting of lhe variance will not constitute a granl of special privilege inconsislent with the limitalions on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimenlal to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal inlerpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in praclical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsislent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumslances or conditions applicable lo the same site of lhe variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement ol the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other orooerties in the same district. o .l\+8 E5 o .LItr(E l-L s T'C(u coIIoII rI E =@ bcII =ao =E6 Co8rrc{ c t a u r() E Ec{ (\l C\I s\ coN g Os /lJJ IrOl E A A 8Jg U) - 5 (o O) g 5\ co No'lv N) (.^) N) O) N) o(D N) OJ o(, N) N) oo) N)(,) o ('r N) N) (j) o)o o f\) (,) l\) C^) o, 5 r\) o N)(, 5 f\) (/) N) o, N) l\) to \of\)n) 1\) \ f\) @ N) t\)(^) o N) ro (,) (t N) l\) (l) N) O) (t N) o fo o (o f\) N) o O)ol\)@ o) l\)q) O) N) o OJ N) N) l\) o(,) N) G) l\) o) co 1\) l\) oo)o \ r9 (}) l\) O) t\J o) f\) tvN) t\) N) ..| ol\) O) (,) 1\) C.) ct) O) to o(l) l\) q) t\){ 1\) N)(l)oo,oluO) ro (t 1\)(JJ O) \ N) oo) N)(r) of\)A 1\) N) oo)o N) l\) q) N)(,)o\ tu l\) o OJ N)(.lJo\or\) f\) (,) N o) N)(tl I a\ rnF f q, oo 5 @o(r) .*l(oA @t\)(t (,(,J !(tl('l \ @6)or @A(tl (rl O) \ @(tl @(tl(tl i5(n \ O) cn -.1 o)i(o(t (o (tl i\o) \! OJ ..l (,) @ (tl @ (tl io, @ @o,('r (o O) @ Ol oor (oo(n -.J\or @@(tl @\(t @@o) @(o(rl z ornI 'Tt TI zt m @I U) -.{ -n D ztom fl m mmx U)I U)t n moDmmx ct)I @ --{ l.r D m 7mmx 1.1 m mmx -t'l m mmx .u m :D mmx 1.1 m .I1 rnm o tl ttl mmx 6 TI m 1 mmx m -tl mm nm mmx -tl m mmx oo m TI mmx (/)- Vt{ u)I U)t @I CNt al m mm al m c)'.l,r mmx Dm c)nmmx a1 m mmx 7m() '?1 mmx oDmoDmmx TI m 1.1 mmx ooTI m c) -tmmx Tm c) :Dmmx -t't m TI mmx Tmoal mmx o 1.1 m mmx ooa1 mo JJmmx a1 TI m mmx ID-{ii rnfn -'1 t- rt- m €ma-l.Tl r t- t-t- m €m U) -.1.Tl r- t- t-r m €m(n-l.Tt r- t- t-t- t, m €m U) -1 F a- t-t- m €mg, I.Tl r t- t-t- m €m @ -1.Tl r t- r- F !., m €m U)-l lt- r rt- m €mg) -.l - r l- o m =m U)+.Tl t- t-t-t-r-r srt- m =U)-{-n t- r rt- m €mq) -l-nr t- t- F m €m @-{-nr r rt- !, m €m U) 'Tlr r rt- m €m U,J.Tl r t- rt- m =m @ .Tl r t- t-t- o m €m U)-l 'Tl r- t- t-t- m €m U)J.Tl t- t- t-r m €m o) 'Tl r- t- srr m €m CJ'I 'Tl t- F t-r m €m U) -Tl t- r t-r !.,m €m cl) .1'l t- r t-r o m €mv)d'n t- =t- t-r om €m '11 l- t- t- F m €trl U)I 'Tl r- t- t-r m €m @I 'Tl t- t-srt- om €m {'n t- t-srr m €m U) 'Tlr t- r F m €m U)-{'n t- F rr om €m @ -'1 -.t1 - F r F m €m @Ilr t- rtom €m Q-l -Tlr (!) -l l6r- I t- Fo m €ma, "n t- t-r m € m CN _--1 'Tlr rr m €m @--t 'Tl t- rr o m €m(n{-n t- !, o (,o,l\)(o o)CN l\)N)A@ 5(tl (o fuN)(t __l t\)@ G)A @ N) 1\)55 \l\)\N)-{@ 1\)(rl l\)5 A(o (tlo N)o) f- -l N (rl 5 -.{..1 N) tn(rl { @O) sn 90 .-| -5 -{o boo) A (o(, -(,) oA 5s Jt{l\) cn io @ 1\)'(n t\) s,Jo CD N)'s \.|J(,J cl, lU'(,) F) ct) N)'l\) -.1 tn'{ lu'lu 5-.1 tn N (,J\5 l\) 5\ (,) Iu t\)9o) Ju N)9 O) '@ (l) 5(o @ 1\) (,| -I{ lo..1 cr) .\l{ lo{o) A-.| (t-{ -5\@ Ln -5 (t bo@ 1\)@\ l\)5 ia(tl CO ioc', o '@ (t f\) iD {(05(o--l F$oI(o I\.|(Jl Pl$@ -oo)f\)I -('| (n(n 5l\J 'oJ N)o) l\)-{ oo(o 5(, -(o(n (tl b,{ ]r g N).Tl N) 'Tl 1\) 'Tl N)1\) 'Tt N)'n N) -Tl t- !! =D l\)z ;mI mz-l t-g l\) 'Tl t- Tl = luz P Dmaomz _-.1 t- l\) 'Tl t- T J) l\)zI a1 m o z =t- I 1\) -Tt I 1lT JJ f\)zI l, L mz =r ]U -Tl r TI = N)zI !m CN l\)-n r -tt =a1 l\)zp al m 1\).Tt t- .It n D N)zI TI m U) N) 'Tl t- ll-tl =al lUzI m CN l\)'n t- llI N)zp al m CN tu 'Tt F ='ir t\)zI :DmL mz =r U'-t N).Tl l\) 'Tl f\) 'Tl N) -T.l t\) 'Tl l\) -Tl N) -Tl lu -Tl 1\) -Tl l\).Tl t\) 'Tl N) -Tl r -o f,l a luzI m =mz =t-o l\) 'Tl t- ll =f, N)zI 1m @ l\)'n t- lla I t\)zI TI m U)omz-l t-o U) -l! { tu =r -tl = N)z Itma mz-t t- U' -JTI =-l N) 'n r Tl =-l N)z -mg. mz =ro @-{T c)-l Iaz r _l-l .'lr| = 1\)zI 1.1 m 9. mz =t-o U'-{rt r TI D ! f\)z ;m @g mz-l t-o6 'T| I -11 =f,l l\)z ;ma0mz-{ t- 0 r -u ! I tuz ; m(, omz =t-o U'-{ r '1-| =:0 l\)z ;m 9. mz-t t-o U'+Tl I Tl -t'l = l\)zI 1.1 m(n mz =t-o U'-{I I T' =an lUzI TI mL mz-l r0 U'-{D I ll D t9zInmL mz -l F- U) -n c)-l I -t-l =I{l\)zI.l,i m (1) mzitr-I U'-{T r -tn T f\)zn ;m @ mz I-o U) -tl I Tl = l\)z * mLomzI rg @+at t- D D t\)z nm F mz =t- 0 ct)--ln t- 1.1 =1.1 t\)z !mq. r-t mz =r U)--{a -t t- al = NJzI TI mL mz =t- v,{n -1 t- 1'T ! N)z ;m(t mz-l t-o v, 'n o l- I I tuzp :Dm @ a a1 =TI ruz ; mq. mz =t-o U'{T -1 t- 1'! r l\)z ;m U) mzJ ro CN =-{ t- TI = tuzI f,mL mz -1 t-o ct)-l JJF -{ t- ?r ='Tl 1\)zp g. omzJ t- 0 U)+f,,o{ mz =r I mz =t- r-1 mz =r t-l mz-l l- omz-l t-o mz --tt- U) n6-l 0mzI t- @ I c)-l @ -l!{TI @ D6 c/).{T6I U)-tt -t @ I(, -l CDID _1 @inF -"1 @Jn U)-{n U' -.{ 6 -t-t -l o {-l -1 -1 -t o -.{_J oI -l -l -{ t-o g, Nocr 5 g. = o @ f zo Pat Dauphinias Dauphinias-Mosely Construction P.O. Box 1515 Vail, Colorado 81657 May 14,2001 Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: A request for a minor subdivision and a variance from Section 12-6D-5 of the Vail Town Code to allow for the resubdivision ofLot l, Strauss Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 46 & 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2, re-creating Lots 46 & 47 , located at 1916 & 1936 West core Creek Drive. Dear Planning & Environmental Commission Members, I am requesting approval ofa minor subdivision ofan existing lot and variance to allow for the re-ffeation of two lots once legally platted and located within the Town ofVail. The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate how Mr. Strauss received incorrect information regarding the need to subdivide his propedy in 1990 and how this proposal for a minor subdivision and variance request each comply with the applicable review criteria. The Vail Village West Filing No. 2 subdivision was platted and approved by the Eagle County Board of Comrnissioners in 1965. In 1986, the Town of Vail annexed the subdivision into the Town's corporate limits. Upon approval of the annexation, the Town of Vail zoned Lots 46 & 47 , along with all the other lots in the subdivision, Two Family PrimaryiSecondary Residential. The minimum lot size in the Two Family Primary/Secondary Residential District was 15,000 square feet with a configuration capable of enclosing a square measuring 80' X 80'. Richard Strauss received an approval of a minor subdivision of L ots 46 & 47 in 1990. The approval eliminated the common lot line between Lots 46 & 47 and created a new Lot 1. According to the documentation in the Town's files, Mr. Strauss requested the minor subdivision at the direction of tbe Town of Vail Community Development Departrnent as the solution to an on-street, parking in the right-of-way problem. On January 2,1990, the Community Development Department sent a letter to Mr. Strauss stating that a "parking lot" was not allowed in the Two Family Primary/Secondary Residential zone district. At that time, the staff was recommending that Mr. Strauss submit an amendment to the allowable uses section of the zone district to include "parking lots". On December 10, 1990, the Community Developmenl Department presented a memorandum to the Planning & Environmental Commission in response to a minor subdivision request zubmitted by Mr. Strauss. In Section I ofthat memorandum, the staff states that "parking" is only permitted as an accessory use to a residence. SAff finther states ltnt, "By combining Lot 47, which contains a single family residence, wtth Lot 46, which is vacant, additional parking can be placed on Lot 46." The information and direction provided by the Community Development Department in 1990 was incorrect. Section l 2-2-2 of the Town ofVail Zoning Regulations defines a "lellef sile" as, "A parcel of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a use, building, or structure under the provistons of this Title and meeting the minimum requirements of this Title. A lot or site may conskt of a single lot of record, a portion ofa lot of record, a combination of lots of record or portions thereof, or a parcel of land described by metes and bounds. " This definition has not been amended since 1990. According to the above-described definition, it was not necessary for Mr. Strauss to eliminate the common lot line to achieve his desired results ofproviding additionai parking for his residence. A timely example of how this definition has been correctly interpreted and implemented is the Vail Valley Medical Center proposal before the Planning & Environmental Commission today. The medical center is located on Lots E & F. The surface parking area for the hospital is located primarily on Lot E, while the hospital is located on Lot F and no subdivision eliminating the common property line is required. There are other examples as well (Gasthof Gramshammer, Beaver Dam residences, A&D Building, May residence, etc.). The minor subdivision and variance rcquests comply with the prescribed criteria for review. The request for a vadance from the minimum lot size requirernent is not a grant of special privilege. According to the Town's files, the vast majority of the existing lots in the Vail Village West Filing No. 2 subdivision do not meet the minimum lot size requirements. If the variance is not approved, Mr. Strauss will be held to a higher standard with regard to lot size (21,083 sq. ft.) than the other owners in the vicinity. The average lot size in the subdivision is approximately 12,000 sq. ft. in size. There are exceptions, extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to Mr. Strauss' lot that do not apply to other properties in the zone district and the subdivision. Unlike other properties in the zone distric! the subdivision and the Towr! Mr, Strauss was required to elirrinate a common lot line when it was not necessary. Additionally, if approved, the resulting lots would be of similar size and configuration as the other lots legally platted. In this case, Mr. Strauss is asking to re-create two lots as they once existed. Mr. Strauss is requesting the minimum amount of deviation from the applicable regulations by requesting that the lots be recreated exactly as they existed. The strict interpretation of the minimum lot size and site dimension regulations deprives the applicant of privileges enjoyed by otbers in the immediate area. As previously stated, the average lot size ofplatted lots within the subdivision is approximately 12,000 sq. ft.. Each of these lots is zoned Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential allowing for two dwelling units per lot. An approval of this request rightfully re-establishes the applicant's ability to construct two dwelling units on each lot in accordance with the applicable land use regulations (GMA, site coverage, building height, setbacks, parking, etc.). The minor subdivision application is appropriate in regard to the Town's policies relating to densities proposed, rcgulations, environmental integnty, compatibility with surrounding land uses, and the effects on the aesthetics of the Town. The proposed density allowed is turo dwellhg units per lot with a maximum of 25 square feet of GRFA for each 100 square feet oflot area plus applicable credits (425, garage & EHII). The integrity of the environment is notjeopardized as the proposed re-creation ofthe two lots is as originally platted and within an already developed area ofTown (in-fill). Future development on the vacant lot is compatible with surrounding land uses as the lot remains zoned Two Family Primary/Secondary Residential. Currently, the existing and potential uses in the vicinity oflots 46 & 47 are all residential in nature. The residential densities vary between single family, duplex and multi-family. Lastly, the aesthetics of the lots are subject to the site development standards (Title 14) and design guidelines (Chapter 1l) already adopted by the ' Town of Vail. Again, I am requesting an approval of a minor subdivision and variance to allow for the recreation oflots 46 & 47 within the Vail Village West Filing No. 2 subdivision. A:r approval is appropriate as the purpose of the application is to correct an error ilom the past and, more importantly, because the request complies with the criteria prescribed for requests of this nature. I TOWT'I OFVAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www.ci,vail.co.us .,. ) rl rl \Ir May 15,2001 Pat Dauphinias PO Box 1515 Vail, CO 81657 RE: Minor subdivision of Lot 1, Strauss Subdivision Dear Pat, The Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the minor subdivision requesl for Lot 1 , Strauss Subdivision in a worksession at the May 14, 2001, meeting. ln general, they were in favor of the request, but were unable lo act on it until a topographic survey has been submitted lo the Town slaff. I believe you have the surveyors scheduled to begin the work today. Please have them shade all the areas greater than 40% slope and calculate the area of this for each lot. The request is currently scheduled for the June 1 1 , 2001, meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to conlact me at 970-479-2369. Sincerely, /n , r\l nl,l,l^* Uh"- Allison Ochs Planner ll Town of Vail {gr*uor ro TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Vrydhtoilkr&tl* lir. tfitlt \uA !. fu[r{:, , ,MEMoBANpuM -$hn- 6rut w*hE h;fiXh o,lutdiT Planning and Environmenlal Commission fiW- N $tlr, l,n*rlf\o V f4 Department of Community Development fu- ln/, h nqO'g \lrw- natuns hiltA -" May 14,2001 A requesl for a minor subdivision and a variance from Section 12-6D-5 of the Town Code to allow for the resubdivision of Lot 1, Strauss Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 46 & 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2, re-creating Lots 46 & 47, located at 1916 & 1936 West Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Richard Strauss, represented by Pal Dauphinais Planner: Allison Ochs DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, Richard Slrauss, represented by Pat Dauphinais, is requesting a minor subdivision for Lot 1 , Strauss Subdivision, to recreale Lots 46 and 47, Vail Village West Filing No.2. This minorsubdivision request also requires avariancefrom Section 12- 6D-5 Lot Area and Site Dimensions. The minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. Lot 47 would be 11,'151 sq. ft. and would not be able to enclose a square area 80 fl. by 80 ft. Lot 46, would be 9,932 sq. ft. and would meet the site dimension requirement (capable of enclosing a square area 80 ft. by 80ft.). MINOR SUBDIVISION Pursuant to the Town Code, a minor subdivision is defined as: "Minor subdivision" shall mean any subdivision containing not more than four (4) Iots fronting on an existing street, not involving any new street or road or the ertension of Municipal facilities and not adversely affecting the development of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property. VAR]ANCE According to the Section 12-6D-5 of the Town Code, 12-GD-5: LOT AREA AND S|TE DTMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty teet (80') on each side, within its boundaries. Vail Village West Filing No. 2 was originally subdivided in Eagle County in 1965. The Town of Vail annexed the area in the early 1980s, de-annexed in '1985, and r+annexed in 1986. In 1985, a variance was granted to add a garage in the front setback, allowing for a 5 ft. fronl setback, one parking space in the right-of-way, and a site coverage variance to allow lor 24/" site coverage. In December of 1990, the applicant requested a minor subdivision to vacate the lot line between Lots 46 and 47, Vail Village West Filing No. 2. The applicant has an existing residence on Lot 47, where the Town issued il. a Home Occupation Permil. The applicant purchased Lot 46 and proposed to pave a portion of Lot 46 for additional parking. The Community Development Department denied the proposal, stating that parking is allowed only as an accessory use lo a residence in the PrimaryiSecondary zone district. Subsequently, the applicant applied for a minor subdivision to vacate the lot line between Lots 46 and 47. The minor subdivision and lhe proposed parking area on Lot 46 were then approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The applicant is looking for inpul from the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding the feasibility of this request prior to having the sublect property surveyed. Because the minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. of buibable area and buildable area is area which is less than 40% slopes, a full topographic survey is required prior to final action on the request. Statf's recommendation is to table this application to the June 11, 2001 meeting. However, because the applicant has requested to remain on the May 14rh agenda as a worksession item to receive input from lhe Planning and Environmental Commission, staff is providing the following recommendations: MINOR SUBDIVISON The Community Development Department recommends denial of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the lollowing findings: 1. That the application is not in compliance wilh the intent and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations, the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable. 2. That the application is not appropriate in regard 1o Town policies relating to suMivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, environmenlal integrity and compatibility with the surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, and effects on lhe aeslhetics of the Town. VARIANCE The Community Development Department recommends denial of the variance from Section 12-6D-5, Vail Town Code, subject to the following findings: '1. That the granting of the variance will constilute a grant of special privilege inconsislent with the limitalions on other properties classified in the Primary/Secondary zone district. 2. The strict literal interpretation or enforcemenl of the specified regulation would not result in practical dilficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Subdivision Regulations. 3. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the Single Family Residential Zone District. 4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by lhe owners of other properties in the same district. tv. ilt.ZONING ANALYSIS MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW CRITERIA One basic premise of subdivision regulalions is that the minimum standards for lhe crealion of a new lot must be met. The first set of review criteria to be considered by the PEC for a minor subdivision application is as follows: A. Lot Area The minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. As proposed, Lot 46 would be 9,932 sq. ft. Lot 47 would be 11 ,151 sq. ft. Seclion V of this memorandum describes the criteria for review of a variance request. B. Frontaqe The minimum frontage in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 30 ft. As proposed, Lot 46 would have 82 ft. of frontage. Lol 47 would have 74.5 ft. ol frontage. This proposal complies with this requirement. C. Site Dimensions Each site in the Primary/Secondary zone district shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area 80 ft. on each side within ils boundaries. As proposed, Lot 46 complies with lhis requirement. Lot 47 would not comply with this requirement. Section V of this memorandum describes the crileria for review of a variance request. The second set of review criteria to be considered with a minor subdivision request is as outlined in the Subdivision Regulations, and is as follows: The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intended purpose of Title 13, Chapter 4, the zoning ordinance, and other peftinent regulations that the PEC deems applicable. The PEC shall review the application and consider its appropriateness r'h regard to Town policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, effects on the aesthetics of the Town, environmental integrity and compatibility with surrounding uses. The subdivision purpose statements are as follows: Development Standard Existing Allowable Existing Proposed Lot 46 Proposed Lot 47 Existing Lol47 Man, Lot Size (bldble area) 15,000 sl 21083 sf 9932 st 11151 st 1 l151 sl Man Frontaqe 30f 156.5 r 821 74.5 t 74.5t GRFA 5280 + 250 + 500 (EHU) sf 2752 st 2908 + 925 (EHU) sf 3213+250+925 (EHU) st 2752st Site Coveraqe 4217 sl 2676 s{1986 or 2483 (EHU) st 223O or 2788 (EHU) sf 2676 sf Setbacks 20t't5t15t15 5n 00/15/50 20/15t15/15 20/15/15t15 v17t15/50 Landscape (min) 12650 st 8451 sq. ft.5959 sf 6691 sl 8451 sq. tt. Parking Per 12-10 spaces Per 12-10 Per 12-10 3 soaces' Densily 2 du + Type ll EHU 1du 1 du + Type I EHU 1 du + 1 Type IEHU 1du 'Received variance to allow 1 sDace ir 1 To inform each subdivider of the standards and criteria by which development and proposals will be evaluated and to provide information as 1o the lype and extenl of improvements required. Staff Resoonse: One purpose of subdivision regulations, and any development conlrol, is lo establish basic ground rules which the staff, the Planning and Environmental Commission, the applicant and the community can follow in the public review process. This applicalion has been submitted according to the requirements of Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulations. To provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict with development on adjacent property. Staff Response: The proposed plat does nol creale any conflict with development on adjacent land. To protect and conserve the value of land throughoul the municipality and the value of buildings and improvemenls on the land. Staff Resoonse: Staff believes this proposal will not be detrimental to the value of land throughout Vail, nor will it be detrimental to the value of land in the immediate area. To ensure that subdivision of property is in compliance with the Town Zoning Ordinance, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consislent with municipal development objectives. Staff Response: The applicant eliminated the common lot line between Lots 46 and 47 in 1990, eliminaling two non-conforming lots. Because the proposed subdivision would re-establish two lots which do not conform 1o minimum lot size requirements, staff does not believe that the subdivision is in compliance with the Town Zoning Ordinance. A variance is necessary, and staff does not believe the criteria for a variance have been met (Please refer to Section V of this memorandum.) To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequale and efficient transporlation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational and other public requirements and facilities and generally lo provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. Staff Response: This aspect of the subdivision regulations is intended primarily to address impacts of large-scale subdivisions of property, as opposed to this particular minor subdivision proposal. Statf does not believe this proposal will have any negative impacts on any of the other above-listed public facilities. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of newly subdivided land and to establish reasonable and desirable construction, design standards and Drocedures. Stafl Response: This goal of the subdivision regulations will not be impacled by the proposed plat. 2. 3. 4. o. V. 7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, and ponds, lo assure adequacy of drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the municipality in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the communily and lhe value of land. Staff Resoonse: As proposed, staff does not believe that the proposed minor suMivision will have any impact on the above relerenced goal. VARIANCE CRITERIA Consideration of Factors Reqardino the Variance: The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. As proposed, staff does not believe that the requested variance will have any impact of potential uses and struclures in the vicinity. However, al the subject localion, the current density allowed is 2 dwelling unils plus one EHU for a total of 3 units allowed on site. As proposed, each lot would be allowed 1 du, plus 1 EHU, for a total of 4 units on site. Staff does not believe that one additional unit on this site will substantially impact the neighborhood. In addition, the requesled subdivision does not trigger the need for any other variances lor the existing house on Lot 47. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in lhe vicinity or to attain the objectives ol this title without a granl of special privilege. In December of 1990, lhe owner requested a minor subdivision to eliminate the lot line between lots 46 and 47. By eliminating this lot line, the fot was brought inlo compliance with Section 12-6D-5 Lot Area and Site Dimensions. Staff believes that approval of the request would resultin a grant of special privilege. The minimum lot size in the Primary/Secondary zone district is 15,000 sq. ft. Because Vail Village West Filing No. 2 was subdivided in Eagle County in 1965, many lots in the neighborhood are nonconforming with regards to lot size. The average lot size in Vail Village West Filing No. 2 is approximately 12,000 sq-ft. The applicant was informed by the Community Development Department in '1990 that it was necessary to eliminate the common lot line il the applicant wished to put additional parking on lot 46. Title 12 of the Town Code defines a lot or site.as: A parcel of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a use, building, or structure under the provisions of this Title and meeting the minimum requirements of this Title. A lot or site may consist of a single lot of record, a portion of a lot of record, a combination of 1. 2. lots of record or portions thereof, or a parcel of land described by metes and bounds. Because a "lot or site" may consist of a combination of lots, it was unnecessary to eliminate the common lot line to allow lor additional parking to be created on Lot 46. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribulion of population, tlansportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Slaff does not believe that the requested variance will have any negative impacts on the above referenced criteria. B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before oranlino a variqnce: 1. That the granling of the variance will not conslitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public heallh, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvemenls in the vicini$. 3. That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The stricl lileral interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would resull in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent wilh the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in lhe same zone. c. The stricl interpretation or enforcement of lhe specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same dislrict. oo $HJ E =ct &,Ic(E IIL -T'C(Ego!-ot- II E =@ Loca- =ao5g 6 C')8rr(\I e g a U B".l cl(\l I o$l HI o E ( A 3c\l ( 6i!= fi coo E:ta (t anf E U> r 36E ) (or CD (ov som ct o'l v ot t-o @ N) o N)o) (D o OJ G) 1\) l\)o) o) oo) N) CDo N) (,^) N) o ct)o(^)(Jl N) OJ <',o o N) t\)o) o, A t\) N) O)o 5 lu t\)(,) o) OJo) N) o N) OJ O)ol\) N) N o-{ N) N) t\)o) \ N)(n N) 6) N) o(D o t\) OJ OJ t\)(,oo,o o) ru N)(too) (tl f\) N)o)oo)oo(o o CD l\)o) o) lU N) (, N) <,,J o) C,)o N) oo)ot\)(o N) t\)(too)o N) (, N) @ 1\) N)(,) o)o -.I tuo) o, N) N)(.) o)ol\)N) t\) {o N)o) t\) l\)o) o) q) l\) o(..) N)(..) o)o N)! C.) l\) o)o N)o) N) N) o)oo\ N) (..) N)(too)ot\)5 N) o(r) N)6)oo)ol\)(r) l\) N) o\ol\) N) o) N)(,^) o\ t\)o o OJ 1\) o) t\)or x -lJornr- o No CL qt @(o5 @ (,) -.1 5 @t\)(, !(tl(r) ..1(tl(t OJ @o)(tl s('| (ooo) (t o) -{ (t (Jl(rl --,1A('r \ (rl \.| (Jl \ ql (tl \../\\G) ..,| @ @ (rl (tl -.1 @ co ct)(Jl o)@ ('r (o Cn (oo('r \\(Jl 6@(,r \t(tl @co O) @(0(tl z s rnI .Tl TI z-t c)m I (n+ -Tl oz m !m Immx (tI at oo m mmx U)I @t J)m c).T| mmx IJmoammx ?l m mmx moll mm m TI mmx ot mo mmx /:r m JJmm oo-n m mmx o m vmmx o m !mmx o J)mo mmx (DT t @I t o)I ct)t m afnmx oof,m c)t)mmx oTm c) T)mmx o flmoImmx oo mo mmx ooDmof,mmx o -t moammx oovmo mmx o Imoammx oo rn Immx c)otm c) mmx oo JJm C)!mmx :0m tmmx o amoammx 6-|Irn rD-l t-t-I-r r t-a-t-t-t-r rr- m €m U'--l -Tl I- zt- t-r m €m @{ -Tl t- t- t-r om €ma{It- t- t-f m €ma,{ 'Tl t- F t- Fom €ma-{ i,'|- t- t-r om €m U)-{Ir F r F m €m U)-{Ir- t- t-r om €m @--{ It- T-I- rl- o rn €m CI'{ -Tl I- ct) -{ lc')|-. a r- rt m €m U'-{'Tl r- T- rt- m €m @I -Tl a- I- rt- m €m U) -1-r'l t- t- rt m €m @I-n I- t- r Fom =mu,-l -11 r r- t- F m €m U)+-nr t-t-t-r a-t-I- t- Fo m €m(t)i -Tl r t- F m €ma-t'Tl t- t-r- om €ma --{It- rr m =m @-{-Tl t- r-a- om =ma--l It- rr m €mg)-lIt- rt- m €m @ -.t-Tl t- I-r m €m @ -.t 'Tl |- t-t- om € mgt It- rt- m €m ct) -1-Tt r l-t m €m CN-{It- rt- m €m '-1 'Tl t- t-r m €m U) -1 'Tl t- r F m =m U){It- r-r m €m(t IIt- r-r m €m @I 'Tlr r-t- c)m =m U>-{.Tl I_ t-g m €m U)-1 '1'l t- t- Fc)m €m U)JIt- rto m €m U)-t-Yl t- 0 o C'J o)l\)(o o)(t f\)o l\)s@ s(tl (o N)I\)(t {\o l\)6 o)$@ N) N) Cr) A5 !1\)\,1 tu\@ N)qt l\)5 5(o ('|N)o)a oo f! 3oz 9 N ]\J C'I 5 -i{ N) 9o(tl(,| -o)o)\ S.) @(t -(Jl (r) -.1 F { boo) Abo 9o(o(tl 5 55 N{l\)(Jl ao@ Ju(rl IU bo, 1\)'s\: OJo) J\) <,/) Po)o Jut\)\ ;-\ J.)t\)5\| (Jl It (o (r) .\t5 P 5-.I tD N l\) s>o) l\) tu o) -(o G) 5(o t\) gl \._l 1\)\o, .\l\P.! o) { \ 5\ (Jl\ -s{ 90('|\l '5 o) snco@ t\) \ N)5 -@ ('lq) ioo) (o(Il 1\) CD I\t(oI(o{ -o$oI(o\ 1 o) N)@ c')l$o, (r) 'cn (nul5l\) o tD N)c) i\r -.1 ob(o so) (o '(Jt (Jl b,{ Ig N) -Tl I-tta l\) -Tt t- N) -Tl N) -Tl =TI l\)'n - -o7 I N)zI m U)o mz-ltt- LJ6-{ N).Tl N) "Tl f\) "Tl N) ]I l\) -Tt tu -Tl f\) -Tt N) g I$-n l\).Tl - = N)z ;mIg mz-{ r l\).Tl N) -Tl l\).Tl l\) -Tl l\) -Tt N.Tl N) 'Tl t- l,I t\).Tl ='n ='Tt N)zp TI ma(f mz-{ t- 6-{u -1 l\).Tl I-u :D 1\)zI TI m(t, g mzI t- 6-l F -l t\) -Tt I l,I T NzI a)mI mz-{ t- @i 6-t N)'n =I l, =TI l'UzI f,m U)g mz{ t-o CI'd'il 6J N) s N) s l\) -Tl - TI lU 'Tl r T! b = I a1 I E TI N)z ;mIclmzI t- U)-tn - .Itr N)z ; m omz =t-o a,II - -It f, t- a1 = t\)z ; rnIg mzI r a 1 r =I l\)zI Im 9.omz-{ r @JTI r 1'2 t t\)zI m C')g mz-{ r ; .n t- roll r- =! N)z ; mL mz =,- U,-l o-t - -(,v 'tr Nz -m EmzI t-g @I e-It a a N)z ;maomz -1 t- a -.1 I-It I -?1 t- at I.It I r TI I TI I _tl = n)zIam U)ImzI r(f CDdat = I-It =I t\)zp ?t ma0mz-{ t- I @-l:o6-l r- -It 7 -11 l\)zI flmaomz =t-0 C]' -.tft ITT I .n 7 N)z ; m U)omz =r o T l\)z ;mI mz-l t- N)z ;mag mz-ltt- r'1 D l\)zI f,mq) omz =t- N)z -JJmI(f mz.{ t-(, CN-la ! N)z ; m U) mz = |_ @-l n t\)z ; U) mz-l t-o -tT1 ^-t al l\)z TJmag mz-l r a N)zr_l ;maomz =t- N)z P an mg. 0mzI t- l, N)zI I IE mz -tFr-a I l\)z --lJmaomz--{ r- I I\)zI maImz+ t- T' l\)z ;ma(] mz-{ t- (J l\)zI flmIclmz-{ t- 6+ ^ Nzp m 9.Imz-{ t- @-t! 4 N)zI f1 m u) Emz -1 t- U) -1ft I D N)zI Ima0mz{ f- (n '"'1.r1 -iu U)--l! (n-lT1 U>--t-t @ -t-t U) -'1-ft a{TI -1-Tl F --.1 U)U'-lfl a{TI r\- -t @-la C) -t-i -l i -t o-t -l a -l {+.--1 --t -t {-t c) --.1 o Daupfutfi- Beal fdhte 6uk Dev., Inc'ptRttoR" P,O. Box l515 '1404 Mo€ine Drlve Voll. CO 81658 Nuurbcrof Pages includingthe cover : 12 Office : Town of VaiI Fax Nnsrber :479-2452 Date; April 27,2Q01 COI\FIDEI\TtrAL Telefax Transmittal To: George Ruther City, State : Vail, Co. Phonc Nurnbor : 479-21 45 Scnder : Suzanne oellular- 176-1525 ADDITIONAL MESSAGE : Dear George, Sorry this was delayed, Asrerican Heritage Title preparefthis als<x)n as it was possiblc. They were askcd to fa:c this directly to you. I was unable to veriff tbat they had compl4ed the fax so I am fa:<ing tlis, betteryou have two copies than "no" copies. Thmk you for all your help on this matier. Sincerely, Suanuro E. Dauphiuis v DELIVERED BY FAX. FOLLOWED BY MAIL Plcase call 1-97047&9112 iftranrmrs:ron rs r you experience any other difrculties in rccciving this documenl C-' (off.) e70"47691 12 (Fox) 97Gd769@2 +ii'g ilg'riii'l'1#r-f '$fllt'$tv jrRANsMIrrAL - fnsr AI{DRIcAN mnrfiGlE TII.q.gq I rn w. B€.vr j1st !l11.. rn . ^til-6- irl'zo: n' Ozo) rrE rql ' Fttt g?o tr}'0" DAm rs,rt! 1?, 3OO1 ORDSRNo: !t36133801 pI[oP- ADDk 1936 mri corc graol f', Yril' coloraio a1657 OWlrllik/BUIERT auir Dev- Ins ' il0, 0?{5o PI.,EA$E DELTYER TO TTG CI'TSTOMER IJSIED trELOW: lcloslMi rtorc o.tr; s.tlE.p 5131:.:: rf8T: t.! rrdtro./E th o'tr'4rr;LOSlMi Pl,ttg rr.alerE E tc'EagB lrEre -sob-Ffrii- iil;:' trL3'11,!i"i?,aY'i3'.0 l. 1/lL'to-ri,Ir -F-jFYC*_qr_ Fbttlltilr&'|Ea-'g9 'IflcWagffiffi f6 o-rl-seaYll r.orG |Irvd',NElr gO 01620 r!68g {9701 919-4105tit - ae?oi ere-.06e rtr:tare rirrcO, DNDtyErt cort$i! 1 r,frdr tst rilclrarlElO! P.atetraa r.3rl' Eateto Eo Dclr a269lvo, co 81620 Fffi'l#8i iii:111! * coDrEg: 1 to: DatrElbilri. SsrI E tac' F,O, gocvdl, co 1515!1458 tOgI|Irc E||!!aoD: tll lnlc ErrzErsla Ougilnlr sS[E r (t70t 176'tLl,2Eltr (97O) 475-9OZZ rpnrr$ l!$l'FD! tll xFtr: Fatrld h[,liblBds PBoE; 970-l?5-9055rrx! 970-lT5-902?. 'I,OUTIDC tcmoD: Ff,r lllt!tr: SIPI{8!El:r: no0tlrc EIBOD! lql& C-r * coDl!8! 1 * coEIEE r 1 I coPlEs: 1 Tr Nst'lt !DO: guDr llct. Iao " fo Boa 1515infr, co !1558-1515 sor lJ.chrad ald c.ao:'ln5 at autt 9o 8* 1110netf, co 01558 ESesovaIElI.IttoFg&I&tsltomIn'riI!:DllEDD,aaIl&s-BvEEEdu,rv|plD.tFuloros dlyt rr Qurslrom ;Err;trG rirst FqerysJ''i'"i-c9!tqr:85E tmrcrt gsrrcr Etrr.E c:o !! !!r rssys d6G--ndi6En. plrest nwrifr rd nproeap n'EEullD crilE'slilr rlo iixc-FiE- or tE tor.LlrrE rrse co*!rr@ flBEEtr: Dbr Ed4lltrl G-- lpr, 2?. 2001 ll:091[ I'lI$ rWllcAli !t o rro.0?45 ''p.2/t1 Tho Tit ln$|rrtc. coi trEt|., lrr lca.l contnct.!|l|eenyou rndlracornpsu' lt il hfrld lo thor rm b.ds o'l rriar r ru .|il;'i-11"..ffiffi; dtii F |3, nt potioywn Itcltt yotl noritrt ;,r.fi rtttt b !r.i. c rirf.rrfpat ui tinimor!3 *rorn ln ih' Folicy' Ttr aotnPray wil giw you e rrnpb d tt|s Policy tr|n' if you aJc thr @mnttrnent b b.rcd on $o lrnd.bdl ffi olth.€ conmilmfit Dsle Arv ah'fi$ hGo||fil rruaot ril rniJjoion rnry rttccttdConmittncat ild ilro tullqt' th. Commltlrorl'E sfiGd bb FccttiqurE Exc'eticr 'nd Cdtditcl* rHrs rNFG*Art*,a *tt* oF rltE rrn-E Nsufilcr cQilMrtmm rrrr,"EOFdfftB{fi AGREE}IENT T! IIXIUE PCILICY SCHEDULE^ 1. Cocrnitrml osD a Fotioic3 b ba Flc4 An6rrilr |r|d PrcpaC l'tufd3 3,, rd ra! h trra Lrtd ltld orlrtr .,[, ocloilFtkn Ot UrG L||d :EHEDUIEII -Fapic'lrtr I sCITEDULEEt-koePtonr I coNotlroul I 'l I YOI' $lot Lo * o rHE comhGff Vfr+Arnnn'r'r' -lf lal| nrv. Jty quaati;trtsdl rr cua;rtrlrt' olql colrd h' h6uh9 ofiae hoo I 2 z t 2 3 a l-A FIR€f, AIIEFIGAIII HENITACE T]TLE COI|PA}IV NFOATTNON C-. ,{pr. 2?, 2001 lll0sAu r'5 ilIIRIcAl| coNDmoNs DEFTNfTIONS (a) .Mongqe- means morrgDge. deeal of. tru€t or o$1er secrrity insrrumGtlt' ibl oPublic Becotr" means utie rccordo mat g i'c consf uctive noriceol mrtlctselfecting the title l-,.lorOnJro u,. stilc law whee ths lsnd is localed' LATER DEFECTS The Eleeplions in Schedule B ' Scction 2 may be amended lo show any dulects' liens of encilrnbEnces trrt Eppear roi rn"-rror $me in pubtic.records or are cr€ated or 8ltached betw..n rhe commitment o;;; iila6;^ *i irtr "[ ol the Requiremln$ ot schedule B :i;ili-;t;;et. We shalt have no liabilily t'o v1r because ol this cnen&ne'rl- I PI|STING DEFEGTS - I lt any delects, li€ns of sncumbtance$ ex'tsling lt Cimmitnrent Date ere nol Ehown in Schedule B' wemaycmend scncoure a rolilii;ilii;l,Hi"endsdledule Bto shorwrhesedefects.lienr qr.ncumbrancm. weshau beliaite i"io,rii.i.ul.gto paragraph4belewunlersylu tinewof lhis information ffd dic noi tell us aboul it in wrifinE- I LrMtrATloN oF ouR L|ABILIW I ^rjiii'ii.rv "Lrig.tion is to itt',*'ro vou fe. P-olicy reblfrd tio !0 thb commltmenl' when veu to.tuiit"ntqulr"tant rf*"navicnyfiabilltyt6yor'rtoranyt*syouincutD€causaoftnerror ln thE commitment our titbilily witl be llmiled to your actu;l lo8r caGed by your relying on this Commitrnent when you efiBd h good laith to: oomply rrith tlto Reqili.e.nenb shorn in Sdredfe B - gection 1 I OT ellminarewithourwn|tcnconsalranyEraePtiongshoUninSchedu|eB.Scction2. we shalt not be tiabl€ lol tnors rhaa the Policy Amount shcnn in sctrodule A al thlg Commitment aod flrr ri.uilny'it .uUirst to th€ teris ol the Polisy form lo bc i'3ued to you' CIJ'IMS MUST EE BASED ONTHIS COA,IMITMENT Any ctaim, whelher or not b*;i ;;;;sld;nca. wrrich you nay havc-sgainst u3 concgming thc ifiii fo tne f"nO must be b.sed on this o1'nmilm€nl snd 13 sublect to its tBrms' 200-200.r llo.0?45 r.3/ll C-. < 1. a, C-. rl&'i"ilJ'll"d-'jT rU AnEnrcArl .[T P5n Lr!! r.F ct||lrcd COiIITITIIENT FOB TITLF INSUHANCE lssuEo BY G- ' '. FIRSTAIIERICAI{ HERTTAqE TITLE COMPANY aEenl for Fl RST AMEHICAN T]TLE INSUHAI'ICE COUPA|{Y AGBEEMENT TO TSSUE POLICY nFgTAMERIGANT|TLEINSUHANCEGoMPANYEt€rredtointhitco,n'niEnentas|he Compen,, th rou th itr egent, n;frin3* xttt"geTitle Compenv' reterrao 1o it11;pAgr€arnent ss the Atenf agr€6 to irsue r poticyio lou accodlru lo ttre termrbf thc corflmiffiflrt whcn w3 show lhg Dolhyamountenovou.r,",no isint ptop*"oiittti* in sch.dul€A thlscommlbncnt blcofires etfee i.ve rs ot trro Corruntrrnenr Detg ghown in Scfistlulc A ff tln RequiramentE lhowr in thic oommitm3nt have not been nr€t within sir months att6r tl!' Comrrr fi r." ia"ri+ ourobr[a[on underth,sCommitment will shd, Also ou r oblggtbn r.rndertiitt Comn:ts i-"ii*iri ".0 *rt"n ue poticvli GueO *att en our ctligEtion to you wllt bs uildctthe Policy' Orr obligation under thi6 Comoilnrent b lirnited by r|e folloritr$ Tne Frwisr'mg inSche(ll'e A" The BeQui3€miltEh Schedula B-I-G- - The Erc€Ptiens 'n Sch€duh 8'2' TmCondlhlEonPage 1-A Ths commitment is no I vslid without scH eDU LE A and sec-tionS | 8nd 2 0f ScHEDU LE B First Atwican Ttth Insu nncc Corryny PBISIOENT Fr ty-l;- c.lqL/. sEcREr iY G-- G..- i utlIlo. $1{5 P rrr.2?.2001 l1:10il htxltt uintctil | rinsrAlvtsrucAr'tr*toT ry*S" O 3tt Epdlpry p.O. Bfl l9l0' Ergt', Co rlist' Phorc: O'nf -'J"'' t^d f/n|ltu''s?g COIfiIITII'IEIYT 6csMA r G- - cociuoE !o. E*164S3801 cdtlb8t DrtEt lprlr 20' 2001 at 7 r29 A']t' PolieY eE PolloL6' to Dr isrras (r) otlerr PolisY - iro|naod Isau!€A: suDr Dcv. IDc-, a color''lo corporatiou (bt Lar Eollqf - t!gDo!'a Isrurdl; 3. !.. ,lT|t. LBt -.rt i'r t!3 lDd ' ctLb'd t'r tbtr "*+t"t tr oan4r rt tlhi e@iti'.ac rca lvr t I Ricbardl stEautF a'ud Caroline sttatrs3 Il a. tfbs lrqil rolcd to ir lh:'t csutesE lt darcllboo I lollcnr a tJor 1. straurg .*rbdivisioD, roooEding to tb' PIeE tecof"a Ery Z8' l99f in n""t iSa ab Prse ?82 at RaccPbloD No' 45091?' €* - | CountY ef Egfc, l" sEatc of colorrdo' I (for lnfotulioual Drrrpoees onlvt 1936 t{crt cor' cle€k Dll I I Eo !e D:Ec:grtlea I PREIITDI{: orr!r.!' B IoIlGtY Hortgage PolicY Tax ccrtiflc.te EeEl 1oo-Rcstsrlotlo[lE Fen! 1,19. I-EPA 8n:idenBirl O41ZTlOL 11 r50r25 eb Il 1. 2. l{0.6?{5 t. 5/il$.m Poliea' UEobt $ 200.000,00 s 150,000-00 st $ s s I I 413,00 'roin ror - l'EageDF rts-lo *? 1o5.oo foh lor.r'gasonnts-@ 18 15.00 Foro 130.? - cEc ED&rtcrne$E 35, q0 Fota 130.3'hflrtsion 3 5 . oo Drlctgn - rt:or 2-5 t $I st 50. 00 50 .00 35.00 15-00 C-- oolt1,3!' ?99!r,1^1^' l0.lllu U aulllcAll o llo,6?t5 ?, 6/[strurot DOEllcs !o !3,O5PEs!tnr ffi885 (A stilTDt@m llADl A5 &EQUIRE-D DI corpB'lDo N|sUf,ANEE NrcITIATTOil C__ cl9 PndlEarrf, Wben thls CorPanl' conduotr Eho dlolinE qtrd is lesPonEible Eor' t:T:9i* or flltrrg tha Iegat docu*entr x.r,.rtiii'et"i ii.-iii""".cionl--si" coq'aDv-ub"Ir T rcsponsible for all nEtEerB .r.,tti"tr nppeli-on tba' recorC prior 'r" "oort trte of recording or filing' ECENTC, s LII| PBottEcSrcE tf yorr are a buyer of a silgla frully rclldence you tray reguest mecbanic'g llen coverage- to be issue'l en Your polic! of tagulatce ' It the ploparty b€ihg purchaeed bas loE been the subjcct sE cgnBlnroElofl' i@rov€m.nr3 o, ,apatr-ii-tie fast six mrrtlrs-p"iot ao bhc drt ,:: ehi6 colr itlteat the tequirenenls ulll b- paynent or me appronlitii ptolttit- aEd tb€ conpletion of aD Aflica;it and rhdennity b'y tbe eelles' If tho propetlY beirrE purclraEed trt conEtflrclta: WII"I-3t l"*tt"U wltbia six rlpnEha prior to bhe aurre ie Ehrs cmrltment Bbe reguire{[enhs my . involvc diseloeuf' of certain flnanclar ini*rrrttoo' t'ayrpnt of pttniulns ' and inCc$rigy' arFng dth€rs ' Ebe general requi:enente ellted alovr arc eubJ eog co thc revlslon anct aggrovat of Etrc colpaDy ' G_ - .. .sPBC IlI TAI(ItiIi DISgs'Iq! NOtrlCE {A Frotice Clven In Confornl'ty ttllb Section 1D-11-122 c'R's') the gubj ect land nay be locatecl i'n a special Laxi4s disLrict;- a ecrtificate of tatceg clue lisbing eacn taxiii lurisdiccion shau be obtiinea frotr the oourw treBEuEsr or the caunty greasusc!, s auchorizecl agenE; and iDfor[ation regarding spacial distlicfE aodt the boundaries or-"u"h -ai'ttitc" tty it "b!"*:1 -::-T--the board of coutrty colunlssloncrs, tBa €owrqf clerk ancl recorder' or fhe counEy ass€Bsor- C-'- <- Apr, ??,2001- 1l:t0A[- Fltsl il[tRlcAl{04tzt t ut lr.rJ:.. v' ra v ?ot'' [o. I3{4-El (Co_EEl rratr Ehin t-ngu.gi goiglaat G. SCEDItrE D * 9ecti-6 1 oa/Lr io" 853 6483801 lrlquirurgbr fte toliovlryt E€{utrd.aGa rlutg b3 lFgr (alPirytbgagsce.laIouDlsfolchaint.rcEEiDtbelandarrd/orfortb.noltgagetobe lnsureil. (bl Pey ug tbe Dletrliuns, fece rhd chBrgee for the pollcy' tctobtainadegtsificat€ofEaxeEduefrgutbocounwt'easurerort.DecouDtsytreasurer'g authoriged agent ' (d) the follouing docuFents satisfactolV to u3 !t'rE t bc signed' ilelivared ald recotdedl r 1. Warranty Deed eufficienE to convey thc fce siple estaLe o? ihttrest in the Iand descrlbed ol refetraal to berein, tc thc PtoPoted Iaeured' gchedule A' rten 2l' 2. Deea ot $ruat suffictent ro cncumber tsbe fee *t1'le..eetac: o: il*"""t! i! Ehe IanA d.scrib:d or refctr"4 g6 lsrel'n for tshe UentflC of tbe Progosetl Insured' Sclredulc A, ftem 2 b. 3, Releate of Ebe Dqsd of ftust lroln Blchard strauEs and Caroliaa gtrausE to the Prtblic rrtsitee of Eagle count'lt for lhe lrqnetit of Pirul w' Jaldls to sscure aD indabtedness f" tb";;It"ipLi *t'- of 5l5o'og0-00' and an1' oEh'r a$ou$!E Endl/or obllgrrlone e€cured iu.r"r.7, datea June 20, 2OOO and recorded June 21' zg00 Et Receptlon No' ?32598- |.ReleaEeorrhrDeedofTrusEflotuRlcbardstrau6sandgarolinestrausstorh€ Fublic Tluetce of iagle Councy for the benefit of Paul w' 'tardis to secure an inttebtedneep rn tui [iincipal sum oE 525,000-00' ard aay olher auounts arrd/et obligatlons Eeoqred ib".uly, drrec sspceFber 15. 2000 anc recordled seitt'$Det 15, 2OO0 at Rccegtion trlo - ?39129' 5.ReleaseoftheD€€dofTluscfrohRlchardstrau66andCarolineStrauestotbs Public Rrustee ot i"gle counly for ?hc bcaefit of ![onta3 E Uortgage ' Jnc" aba Dircotorg accepcance-io t"oo"* an lndebtrtlncsc in the PllnoiPRl 9ll!t of 9{50,000.00, and any othe! rnounls andl/or obliE tions Eecurea rhes€hf' daEed July 20, 1999 and iecotaed 'lDgqet 4, Lggg a! R'c'ption No' 701?13' 6.with.tragalofEhetrolicc'ofelecEionajrdD€lEE'n.tforsaleb|rtneI'ubIiGtllrgte€ nr.:nbeled01-033.recordedAPEil3,200latRecepEionNo-7535?{,baseduPDn cbe Deea or rrust reciii"a i'rg"ut'{, 1999 lt {rcq>tioa lqo ' ?0{?13 eor Ehe benefit of Norwe.rs Mortgage r IBc', dbs DirectorB lc'irptance ' - -Cont inued o il0,0715 P. [/]ls!.tlril j-.- t' lpr. 2?,2001- ll:llAU. PI-liT lX$llCAll O4tit'til- riii2:r-r uy -l -v Fo!! io. t34l-81 (C9-881 ft/!A Ebl'a t.rflu.E Cnitlo$t scb'i$rr' E - 8'Gclotr 1 Ssllatroc qrc€r tro. Es3 6{838D1 |l!ae follovi,nE naE'rlel' uld'ch uy lct D'ce6gat!'ty be recordEd' rrlr3 L b' i"i"i"U.a Ec thc ccnEnny to i'b€ salirfrceion Eo-wiB: (e) Gosel;ignc. t ltb ch! ProvlsLoy "f -s?":l:l 39-14-102' Coloredo n'evlsedl Statut'l' 33qui=l'ng ccqlleEilu-and filing cf a Real ProFrty Trars fE! DccLaratiol' (f) Brtatenee *alieEacEory to !b€ Co!|pany of, Ceilpliarrce t'iEh an ordlLnance eBactlag a rerl 3EtrBo .t.o"itt tax wlthin tue rot"--ir vatl togfether uith all estniln'trt6 tbcrcto. g:RceBfious nrsrbered 2'5 utU no! appear on the Xortcagee's Pollcf protticled tbF clacb€d Aff,iclavit and t{lr'dfieBt is properly er€cu!'A rnd leturned to this office- }|cIE:lIraPllj.nlrtrEuaEaPollqlwi],IbeieauedDror'ldedthe.attacbed}ffiibvir end rsreenaat, i- ;;il;;irtit"itta Rrrd rctulnea eo tbis otEice' r{d!E: r? "'E gAriES pntcE oF EtE SsBlEe! Ff,opEfflf scl€Ds<910o'0oo-.oo lrl8 ttEirJlR ' lttar,t BE RSOOTRED rO cocpr.y wrtH TBF D:€CrJostRE OR lfrrsltorrDrtE PBOVrSrdldE oF c'R'S- 19-22-604 -S (dOIAESIDEII IIEIIIioIJLIIG) - ; v !lo. 6?15 P, 8/llstrsu 4-- {,- - <.- Arr. 2?, 2001- llr l1All. Il[$T Al[[licANoaitii'rii ii'i3tit su 't O Fos [e . l3et-82 (co-S0] !'lIIt ilain t al€lu8gle effil'tEDnt 9e@gr'Bi-8ectign2 Orale- Uo. EF35+93801 E caPgloaa fN, I'olls? lr llgur ril1 bave tbr fol!'oriBs .,ro4tj'oal ur1e6a sbdl' ele trlErs carr ot Eo our tltl6frEti€D ! l. fax€s andl Asse€Enents not certified to Ehe Tregsutsr'a Of,ficc' z. trty taccs, rlgrhEa, interesllt or clairns whlcb Bse not Ebourr !ry ?" public records but wblctr corrld be ot"""toio"a Ur an i""pllliit-ti Ehc ltnd or blz rrakiaE insui-y of Persons in Possession tbrreof' L Easerent!, or clains o! easehents' not shoso by puUtic recorCg' 4'Discrepancie=,oonflictolnl'outldagy]'ines,shortagainarea.encroacbleDtErand any ,act€ rrbiclr a ao"ri., Euwey "r,a i""p-""ti"i of-the land uoutd dlE€lctte' ala *fri"ft *. not showl bt' the public recorols ' 3- - 5. lny 1ten, or riEbL to a lien' totr seflices' Ir or or lBcdiiol b€reE'olore or heleafter furnlsrred, lrrposecl by Ia$ ona "iL slown by th€ publta recorcls ' 6- Ar{/ and alt unpaid ba'(es. asseEsrBests Bnd unlede€ned tar aeles' T,ReEerwationsa:rdexcePlion5irPtt"hEeln'l:!'nectsauEborizingtheirissuance as the sare nav efEeci tbe $bjecg ptoptiiv-"rra specifical'ln -!he risht of t'rE groprieBor eE 3 v'in er Iodt Lo exBrccr tii t*"tt" hts ore Eherefron should the same b€ tqllll'I co PeB€lrate or i"tarrrct g56 pr-r.l se* as geE fortb in lJnited sEateE r"ttii t""{ded in th€ Eaglc couDty reqords 't Af t i.rfiriive ProccctsloD' ageinGc lE€fir nrrlibe! ?' of gc5€tlu1e 8' Sccrion 2 wlll be ;;;;J thc lendcc b1r rncane or Ehdotsehent 103'1- A. Reserv.EionE and excepEions in Patents anii Acts aullroriuing th€'ir issuaDtre a5 th€ sarlc nay aflect tL. t.'ljtot PropeEty anil speeiiicarr{' :t rightc I'o cli gcbes ond r.tttlitr - ueac- f n o"no"ttil" -gl-"h- ttt"ttd a,ld acctrred nec'er riEhl6 sogetber sicrr *rc'il-E;;;;rt; of a :rlght of $tay for ditches aad canals coustrrcEcdl tsf the aucbollty of trre uniied-siti"e as se! forEb in thaE ceriatn gnited Scates Patent recordeil in lbe Sagle county records ' Aff irutirr€ Drotecbion agl'insB -item nrrnber E' of Schedule B' Section 2 witrI be "?foraeC tbe lenci€r b)' neans of &rdorsement J'03'1'<.. g.ConvenenEg,cancliticnrrDhr.rbrictlone.wbiclrdonot,includleaferfcit\rr9or ravert.r cIruEG, sct fortb ln tbe rnst;nail r'cordpd tpril 7' 1965 in Book l90 at Pag€ 561' lt$cn'h'Ilf of Erld oo""""""" conditlonE tn'l r€rtlictione \r an lnstrumen. ,"oori;;J6*"v 15, 19?0 in soox zr? rc tads 75 ' Prqvieiotrs reEardlns '"."' ::i;;: :;;;-L; '"tlonar orisin' if arv' txe dereted' I 10. Ten pelcent non-parul'clpdclng royal t'y lntererE ln srld to PEoccedE dar ived trom --contiEuoil l{0. 6?45 t. f S/ttrercor 4- {--.l lpr.2'l.Q41,atlur loF tro. r!44-82 193-881 itra ff.fo &r4Prgs e@itDDt uilxRicAll 3-o No,0?45 P. 10/llmr42001- 1l: llAl4.r!:JJi .rw !.. a- ort r lfo. ES!6483801 lbesaleofrrtVsliherat.3ofrthcEgorwer}ilrilatrdnEtrrreproduccdatdlrlltgdf'gn said Presireg, ald any aadl alL er-tdrrncnl" cnereot or i$terestB tbeEein' 'E conrrlncd m rgarlln# uc.i .".oraca o.a"t"r -io, 1952 ia Book 166 ag Drge {07' 11'Tcrns.conditione.Prouigtons,aglecnenE'andoDllEatlonEsPe€ifisdundc!the EaE€BDt W ana beErr'en Clazence t""pti' -ot'l' ana Jrrai ub-eon -HooFe! and tlr" upper Ebgle veltqf sr-uir4tio,rr oittrroa,'" nr.ti-euicipel coEltoratlob rccoscbd rgrii I ze, 19?o ln Book 217 at PaqE {'u' EtEctG$t3. oondilloDs, ,re'Ericsions end reeervaEiotE a' ahortn ii-"Tli"iLa PLat ot v'ir vtllrEs $est Filihg No' 2' Eas€6€nts, coDditionr, restrtfBione t1!-ltt*t'lons as sbown sErlur! slbdlvlslon recorded ilov Za' 199! in gook-554 at Pase No. 45091?, itrcludinEl, hri h* linicedt to'. a 12 IElt utitieY ."r*na along tbe South€rly forlfon of cubj ect DroP'319' colora.do For:r 100 wiII bs atuache'l to tbe uortgagee's DetiqV 12. 13. ltdb.aul€ ! - icct:lot l cootlauetl {.- or res€dteC ga dr tbc llat of 782 ri' !,ecePtio! and &ainage rlren issu€d. I <- Arr,2?,2001 l!:llAil Ds.ted: ltPril 20, 2001 Fflr ll{ERIcA}l il0.0?45 t.f ttltt"o-, I ENDORSSMENT Attacbcrl Go c@nitrDent Uo' ES35483801 Isauod bV FIRST N{r#{/CAI'I MLE NSI]RANCE COMPANY Said Cornibnent iE herEt':/ aDea'lc'l blt 'telellng Paragrapb 2 o! the cohdibiont' Tb,e cclqpany beretry insur*s rEainst roer o1 ^"T?93 t4r t"":9!-:!-thtre being reeordtd a,nv deaCE, nroritseages. rf]- prrra"rr"l llels or.otber ti[te ilcunbranceg whiob firgE aS4rca'. ln Lle pub11c recordc =,rt"i-q"Ei.|i'i- ir,"- "Ji""i"""--p"il--of --cmiEnffit ' h'ut Drlor to che effettive Date oE poric,il--;pollic reccrrls " "* "I!'i-u.ilm-p."rr- tho"" recora" ln whLcb under etatutes deeds, *i"n.il,-i""$l:t!1"-"iiT'-p"iain''ll'"!'lt recorded ln order Eo intErt coEcErucglve;;;i;: to luraa:ers ";-th. l;;d'for value vithout lcronledge' Bh.is e.dersearent dees Bou inrur€ asrlft 'Yll' lotl -:I-3T9"olu, tnt exietence of such deeds, nortsases, lis;;;;;; iior- oi-otu"t.iiti. eneu$bEatrces ia actuallv:qrow! bo sbe Dro'oseit insured_prior'ii-..-lr'th" i+e o! Eb;-;;;=;;gl "": closltrs is d.flaed berei$ as beihd tbs t' ute otr rle execslion and delivery.il ii"--ei"p""tu Lsaurid of tht docrurents lllliiri-tL ini"'"'t of tbe PrcPesec ineured' *- - probcction rrnder rblt atldolsetient ia cor'dlE'loned bt lhe ?ollowlnE reguircesnt: a- i{e rlrrst coniluc! lbe c1o€iug o!. the t'ransacElon to- be insuredl under tlris comitrent oI proPerly €xecutec i.';;;;;;_;ieiti"g Eb€ c8lale or int€rect Eo be ingsred rugt be deliverec to tu"-i i iI" -LttE,*t iisutag Eb€ co@i trocrt ultbil 24 bousr of the cl'osiDg' b.Affj.davibandl,ncennibyattacbeclberebornushbefullye,r€cuEodL|}'theFlEyor entitsy d.asr*'a tu P+agrq-uh 3 of dchedule A' tbe Comdtnrent is herelty qtEn{{ fuztber bv bbe deletion -"n"uiiil-Jil-E"iliJ"r." s---seition 2 Etcepti'oB5' An ALllA Plein irrued. of iEens 2-5 inclusive, Languaga Pol'ioY diII b€ Acolorcdonorm130.3Etrdorsqentrrill.beattacbedtoibeAl.!f,.Plaint.arrquEgePolioy euuor{aricalfy iscreasiag tbe_poricy-a,rounE b,y 'r;;;;-ii.-io". arnount on each o6 tbe firBt ;i;;;mri;Garies of tlre Pcricy daBe' Droteecloltu$d€rtshisendorsementig.Ec.baaffordacltotb€-propoEedinsuredowne' shovfi on Ecbeduls e wt*.n'irrl"ilil;-; i-t"-l eemitrr reeicentiar rot' this andorsesrenE ls tlaile e Pert' of tbe Bolicy and ie subi ect to all oE lbe terue and otovislons thereof and of a'y prior enalorEE".li" 'iU"t"to ' Sxie95 to tbe etB€nb ercPresstry !r"r.d. it nelEher noAtiiar -any of the t.*"- iol liotti"ioou -of the DolisY and any prror ,rndorsenents, ,tot aott"ii- "*'""ii iu" cfe"t[i"[- aitn of thc policv and any pr:ror endorse$ents, not do's ii-lntltaae thB fase a$orrbt th'rcof ' {_- FIRST ^XENC,/IIT TM.E INSAI/INCB COMPANY Ctd.tEilr nel(lt zltlk|.Da{EF <, o o o o o o o I o o o II t\\ I\ ! \r{ Y\\ A, t4;- L ..-< \(\* \\\-<V:r-. I f N - \\ \! \tt ,t r \\,\\. !\ /r+.! \r \ i\I\ t\l\i ,l o o o o ( o O o o. o