HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5B LOT A SITZMARK 1980 1 OF 2 LEGAL\,r;VutTT\ t t-tA S"6JTJ tq& '{a
TO: Planning and Environnental Connission
FROM: Comrnunity Developrnent Departnrent
DATE: March 9, L987
SU&IECT: Exterior alteration request to expand six accomnodationunits, add three neqr acconrnodation units and expandretail and office space at the Sitzrnark Lodge.Applicant: Mr. Bob Fritch
I.THE PROPOSAL
2.
3.
The owner of the Sitznrark Lodge is requesting an exterioralteration and density variance for the fol.lowingconstruction at the Sitzroark Lodge:
I. Expansion of six existing accommodation units, total of555 sf.
Addition of three new acconrnodation units,1,280 sf.
Expansion of existing retail on the northbu.ilding, 845 sf.
4. Addition of new first floor retail space on thenorthwest corner of the building, 500 sf.
5. Expansion of existing second floor office space, 1gO sf.
The density variance is required for the three new
accommodation units as the Sitzmark already exceeds theallowable nunber of dwelling/accommodation units underCommercial Core I zoning. please see the tnemo concerning thedensity variance for a more detailed analysis of thisreguest.
The owner is also proposing to add landscaping, paving andseating lmprovenents to the pedestrian walkway along thenorth side of the building accordlng to a Master plan
developed by the statr- and applicant. The inprovements willbegin on the northwest corner of the property. A pedestrianplaza ls proposed for this area (see enclosure). tneexisting 25 t spruce tree near the northwest corner of thebuiJ.ding is proposed to be relocated to the open space areaalong core creek adjacent to the Sitzmark. The tree ispresently located on Tordn of Vail land. Landscaping andpavers hrill be added to the areas east of the pedestrianbridge abutnent. A new sidewalk with paver accents wlll bebuilt along the remaining north side of the building.
total of
side of the
AIso, within the scope of thls project, the alpine gardenadjacent to the office (r,rest elLvalioni would Le expanded tothe south of the entry stairway. ThiE stairway up to thesecond level conmercial space and the west entiy Lo the lodgewould be revised and upgraded to cement or sanditone.
II. ZONING STATISTICS
Comnercial Core I
(.80 of site area)Allowed: L4,2O7 sfExisting: ll ,362Renaining JF?5 sr
Addition:
2nd floor w. existing. a.u.e. existing. a.u.
3rd f100r. west nehr a.u.east new a.u.w. existing a.u.e. existing a.u.
4th floor
new auw. existing a.u.e. existing a.u.
The following is a summary of zoning statistics related tothe exterior alteration reguest.
Sitzmark Lodqe
Zone District:
Site Area: .4077 acres, 171259 sf
Density: (25 units per acre allowed)Allowed dwelling units: LO d.u. or 20 a.u.Existing density: I d.u. + 32 a.u. = 17 d.u.Proposed: I d.u. + 35 a.u. = Lg.5 d.u.
GRFA:
1L0 sf
75 sf
455 sf
405 sf
110 sf
75 sf
= 420 sf
= 110 sf= 75sf
Total L,835 ne$, GRFA
GRFA renaininq after addition 1,0J.0 sf
Retail: (Unlirnited square footage as long as Urban Design
Guide Plan is conp).ied with. )Existing retail,10,584 sf
Proposed retail additions:Indian Paint Brush: L5O sf
Colorado Footwear: 280 sf
Gore Creek Gol.d: l_40 sf
Breeze Ski Rental: 2'75 sf
Nehr retail addition,
northwest corner: 17O sf
Total I Lr 345 sf
Office:
Existing office square footage = 560 sf
Proposed addition = 180 sf
Total office space,
Site Coveraqe: (.80 of total
Allowed: L4,2O7 sqExisting: 11,300 sq
Proposed: J.,235 sg
new plus 330 sf of
converted existing space
= 740 sf
site area)
#
New total after expansionr L2,535 sqRemaining. L,672 sq
?o)" oi6Heisht: (1t!lA 33 | -43t , {ttg 0-33 ' )
The Urban Design Consideration requires thatarea be at a height of up to 33 | and Gt ofbe 33r to 43r. lO)o
The height of the aQdition at its greatest point is 43 feet,tapering down to affioxllnately 25 ieet on the west elevation.A portion of the existing roof extends above 43 | toapproxinately 53' . fhiE area of the roof is considered to benon-conforning. The addition does not increase the non-conformity of the overall building relative to theregulation.
@25
the
?o of the roofroof area may
Parking: Parking
expansion will beparking fund forresidential space
Strean Setback:
TnE-piojEEE-Eoes
for the retail, office and residential
addressed by the applicant paying into the
CCI . A commercial space is 931000 andis $5, 000.
Required: 50t from Gore Creek centerLine.not encroach into the stream setback.
IIT. COMPLIANCE WfTH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF COMMERCIAL CORE I
ZONE
rv.
L8.24 Purpose. The Conrnercal core I district is intended toprovide sites and to naintain the unique character of theVail Village conmercial area with its nixture of lodges andcommercial establishnents in a predorninantLy pedestrianenvironnent. The Commercial Core I district is intended toensure adequate light, air, open space, and other anenitiesappropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses.The distict regulations i-n accordance with the vail villageurban Design Guide Plan and Desi.gn considerations prescriiesite developnent standards that are intended to ensure thenaintenance and preservation of the tightly clusteredarrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways andpublic greentrays, and to ensure continuation of th; buildingscale and architectural gualities that distinguish thevillage.
This proposal is in cornpliance with the purpose section ofthe Commercial Core I zone district.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUTDE PI,AN FOR VAIL VILI.AGE
The following Guide plan sub-area concepts relate to thisproposal: (Please see enclosed Urban Design Guide plan
map. )
No. 30. Bank inprovements
Riprap, reduced slope, reseeding and shrubs/treeplanting for reinforcement of creek as visual feature ofthe Village.
No. 3I. Future bridge inprovements
Second major entry to core area warrants increased inaqeability--such as with covered bridge (to becorne standaidstructure for pedestrian crossings). Bridge structuregives partial enclosure of creekside rneadow area, avisible attraction from Crossroads. Reinforce entryfurther with paving treatrnent and planting near bridge.
The.applicantrs proposal includes landscaping, seating andpaving improvements to the entire north side of the Sitzrnark.The inprovements address the Guide plants reconmendations forupgrading in this area, with the exception of the coveredbridge.
v.COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR VATL
The Design Considerations help influence the forn ofbuildings in the Commercial Core I district. As stated inthe code, the Design Considerations nare intended to enablethe Town staff and citizen review boards to more clearlycomrnunicate to property owners planning and designobjectives, and to allow property owneis to respond byconforrning to the design considerations or to clearly-denonstrate why departures are warranted.r Below is-asunnary of the applicant and staff reponses to each of theDesign Considerations :
A. Pedestrianization
A 4aigr.obiegtivg fgr Vail ViIIaqe is to encouraqepedestrian_ circulatign throuqh an interconnectedletvrorkgf safe, pleasant pgdestrian wavs. Manv of ttrej.rnprovenents fecoqni?ed in the Urban Desiqn Gufde pLan
anq accompanyinq DgFiqn consideimorce
fld :l<Pgnd the qua utthe Village.
Applicantrs Response:
I'The site of this improvement occurs adjacent to alinited vehicular access street. The street is used forthe pedestrian way. Walking access to the building isbeing inproved by upgrading an existing stairway. Theapplicant has agreed to participate in a renovalion ofthe entire north side walkway. This upgrade wiII becoordinated with the Tohrn of Vail.il
Staff Response:
Thls proposal acconplishes a great deal as far asinproving existing pedestrian ways. The addition of thepedestrian plaza near the northwest corner of theSitznark creates an area that will be attractive topedestrians as it wiLl provide seating adjacent to thecreek, a more inviting and attractive entryhray to thiswalkway and new landscaping along the edge of the creekbank which is presently non-existent. The sidewalkalong the entire length of the building will be upgradedwith new cement and paver accents. The stairway up tothe real estate office will also be rebuilt out ofeither cement or sandstone. Staff's opinj_on is that-.'"_.these improvements are very positive in respect to thg!,e.{estrianization of this area.
B.Vehicular Penetration
Tg tlre rnaxirnum extent possible, aLl non-resident traffic
9.lgyrd le Tgut?d alViIIaqe/VaiI Lionshead parkincr structures.
Applicantts Response:
ttwith a modest increase in conrnercial area, vehicularvisits to this area will increase slightly. Because thelodge is located on the fringe of Commercial Core f,inpacts frour vehicles wilI be minirnal .rl
Staff Response:
The addition will not create any significant increasesin vehicle trips to the building. Fire access has alsobeen inproved at the northwest corner of the building.The existing access is 13 feet and will increase to 20feet with the new plan. Staff feels this is aninportant inprovement as this is the point where fl:etrucks will have to turn into the pedestrian sidewalk.
Streetscape Framework
To inprove the I it
EE
the walkiestrian wa
rl-ence andve continuitv to e s ce and
andsca are to ...4s a so
framework 1 nkaqe alon trian r azas andrces as o es and ts alotheseroutes are encoura .In connerc aI sE,orefrontsgive street and visu teres
Applicant.s Response:
rrlandscaping has been a priority and a strong focus of
endeavor by the owners of the Sitznark Lodge. The areaadjacent to the second floor expansion will be a focalpoint of flowers and alpine plants. Close scrutiny mustbe given to the spruce tree located at the northwestcorner of the site. The applicant would prefer to movethe tree to a more open site, possibly in the adjacentpark at Gore Creekrs edge, and to replace it withdeciduous trees of greater transparency. It is feltthat the existing spruce will not only block the retailshop from passersby but will also outgrow its space.
Hor'rever, the tree does occur on T.O.V. property and theultimate decision must include the Town. rl
c.
Staff Response:
This proposal cornbines the streetscape frameworkconsiderationsr emphaeis on open space and landscapingas well- as infill conmercial to create street life andvisual interest for the pedestrian. The addition of thepoplars, spruce and aspen trees to the east of thepedestrian bridge, relocated spruce tree to the east ofthe pedestrian bridge, and two stone planters witl alladd rnuch needed landscaping to this area.
In addition, the new connercial storefronts create a
much rnore interesting facade for the pedestrian.Display windows will be nrore visible to the pedestrian,particularly on t,he east end of the retail expansion.Presently, a covered arcade exists in front of theIndian Paint Brush, Colorado Footwear and Gore CreekGoId. Staff does not feel that this arcade isparticularly inviting to the pedestrian, as it isdifficult to see the storesr display windows from thesidewalk. The new storefronts wilI be sinilar in designto the Polo Shop retail which will create a continuityof design among the various retail portions of thebuilding. Even though you will never see the north sideof the building at the same time that you see the southside, staffrs opinion is. that the design continuity willbe an inprovement to the entire building.
The owner is also creating a neh, retail storefront onthe northwest corner of the property. Staff feels thatthis retaiL location will be very effective and that itwill be located right at the entrance to the pedestrianplaza. The new storefront will help to add street lifeand visual interest to the west elevation and the areain.general. Staffrs opinion is that this proposal meetsthis considerationrs intent to ,rcreate a vlriety of openand enclosed spaces, both built and landscaped whichcreate a strong frarnework for pedestrian walks as welLas visual interest and activity.tr
Twenty-five foot spruce tree: Staff has agreed that the25' blue spruce tree on the northwest corner of theSitznark should be relocated to the open space adjacentto Gore Creek at the applicantrs expense. Staff wouldllke to see the tree relocated just to the east of thepedestrian bridge and existing lamp post. The TownCouncil would have to give flnal approval to therelocation of the tree. At ttris time, the Council hasbeen informed of general improvenents to Town of VaiIland in the area of the pedestrian plaza. However, aspecific discussion of the relocation of the spruce treehas not occurred. Staff feels that as long as the ownerprovides a letter fron a landscape contractor that the
tree can be relocated, the staff doeswith the moving of the ,tree. If the
moved safely, a conparable tree will
D.Street Enclosure
not have a problerntree cannot bereplace it.
E.
p+++!!i+qipl! f?geqe IFiqhti sh?urd no! be uni{orn rronJ)ur+qrnq Eo burlcttncr, thev shouLd provide a comfortableenclosure for the street.
Staff Response:
This criteria emphasizes that pedestrian streets arebasically outdoor roons whose walls are formed by thebuildings. It states that the shape lrand feel oi theserooms are created by the variety of heights and massing(three dimensional variations) which give much of thevisual interest to the pedestrian scale unique to Vail.rlIt is staffrs opinion that the facadest heights terracefron 43 feet down to 25 feet which creates i balancednorth elevation for the building. However, due to'theinfilt of the building, staff bilieves thai it is veryinportant that the pedestrian areas be irnproved andopened up so that pedestrians do not feel that they arecrowded between the creek and the building. Thepedestrian plaza and landscaping will balance the infillon the upper levels of the building. The expansions ofthe conmercial storefronts, the paving treatment,landscaping and seating will all help to create a weII-defined ground floor pedestrian area.
Street, Edqe
Fuildifrqs ir_r thg Villaqe core should forn a stronq butlrreqular edqe to the street.
Staff Response:
The new retail storefronts are rnuch nore visible topedestrians as the display windows are pushed outadjacent to the sidewalk, particularly in respect to theeasc recail addition. The strong edge of the retail isachieved by using a variety of treatments that wiIIgive each shop its own unigue storefront while stillproviding design continuity among all the storefronts.Staff agrees with the applicant that the currentfrontage suffers due to the generic appearance of theshop fronts and the continuous straight edge to thefacade. Staff's opinion is that the proposal ,particularly in the area of the commercial additions isan irnprovement to the street edge.
F.Buildinq Heiqht
Basically, the Villaqe core is rceived as a mtx o f ttnroand three sto acades, althou ere are aJ-so ourand five store buiLdinqs. Th-of bu heve variety to the street--wh s oes rable.Theheight criteria are intended to encouraqevariety and to discoura e unrtormheights alonq the street.
Applicantrs Response!
rrAlong with the franework of the streetscape, nany ofthe considerations of street enclosure, stieet edge andeven building height tend to overlap and blend inio thesame design consi.derations. The building stahdssonewhat isolate from other structures and yet thestructure is big enough to create its own edge. Theexisting west frontage already satisfies a designconsideration for not being aligned in one plane. Thenew proposal further accentuates an irregular frontageand creates greater interest. It is also irnportant irornthe standpoint of street enclosure and building heightthat the addition steps downward to l{illow Bridge Road.The stepping or tapering function satisfies a bisicdesign concept of relating the void of the street itselfand also the structure frarning the opposite side.Enough variation in the height of the addition exists tocombat the mass of the structure.
Variation to the street edge is enhanced by the retailshop frontage remodel . The current frontage suffersfrom a generic appearance and a singular aligned wa11plane. rr
Staff Response:
The proposal actually creates a more even stepping downof the building as the addition goes from 4 stories to 3stories to 2 stories. The building height has also beenoffset by the creation of the pedestrian plaza belowthis area. The addition meets the building heightrequirement that height shall not exceed ej feet. Thehighest point of the addition is at 43 feet and tapersdown to approximately 25 feet on the west end of thebuilding. The mix of building heights meets the intentof this consideration to have 4O? of the height at nomore than 33t and 60? of the height frorn 33r to 43r.
G.Views and Focal Points
First priority should be iven to an analvsis of thenpact of the pro estrian areaswhether desiqnated or not.
Applicantrs Response:
rrvery little effect on views occurs with this addition.
The extension of the office space on the second levelslightly decreases the view of the Village Center condos
and the Lodge from a perspective viewpoint on WillowBridge Road. rr
Staff Response:
The addition will inpact, sl-ightly the view of the skimountain, Willow Bridge Road, and Surnrners Lodge projects
from the vantage point of the Village Center
Condominiums.
H. Sun/Shade
new or expanded buildin s should not substantiall
ease the spr and fa I shadow ttern (March 21.
enber 23 es or thet-of-way.
Applicantrs Response:
ItThe additional rnassing at the upper floors will
increase the shade pattern falling to the north of thebuilding. Shadow already falls across the walkways
adjacent to the north arcade of shops; the additional
shadow is cast across the stream between the two
bridges. rl
Staff Response:
A sun/shade analysis was cornpleted for March 21st and
Seg:te.rrber 2l"st at noon for che project. According tothe study, approximately 500 square feet of shade is
added to the area of the creek bank extending into Gore
Creek. An additional 40 square feet of shade is castonto the pedestrian bridge. The retail and officeaddition on the west end of the building adds anadditional l-20 square feet of shade. Staff believesthat the additional shade has minimal impacts, as mostof the shade is in areas that are not useable bypedestrians (creek bank and actual portions of Gore
ecE, on vlehrs rron
10
vr.
Creek) . It is true that retail and office additionscast shadow into a pedestrian area. However, staffbel.ieves that wittr the opening up of the pedestrian areaand landscape inprovements, this irnpact will benitigated. Basically, it becomes sornewhat of a trade-off:. improvenents to the pedestrian area by theapplicant with sone additional shade on a portion of thesame area.
I. Service and Deliverv
Any F\rildinq gxpangion should preserve the functions ofexisting service allevs.
The Sitzrnark presentl.y handles all of their trash in anenclosed dumpster on the southeast corner of thebuilding. Staff does not believe that the additionswil.I create any significant increase in need.ed serviceand delivery areas, for these functions remain
unchanged.
STAFF RECOI{MENDATION
Staff recornmends approval of the request for the exterioralteration. It is our opinion that the proposal conplieswith all of the design considerations toi ttre ViIIagL. Theproject also creates significant improvements to thepedestrian walkway and open space adjacent to Gore Creek.The recornmendation for approval includes the followingconditions:
L. The owner will subrnit a letter from a landscapecontractor to staff that confirms that the spruce treecan be relocated safely to the adjacent open space areaalong core Creek. The proposed location for the tree isto the east of the existing lamp post by the pedestrianbridge. If the tree is not able to be relocated, theapplicant will provide a new tree of the sarne speciessize and quality. A performance bond will be r6quiredin the case the tree is relocated and does not live.
2.Preliminary Landscape PIan The owner agrees to constructthe following irnprovements to the pedestrian rday whichincludes the Sitznark property as well as Town of Vailproperty. The final landscapeplan r^r111 be deterrninedbetween the staff and applicant previous to a Design
Review Board rneeting. Final design details need to beworked out due to the discrepancies between the staffplan (Winston Assoc. 3/3/871 and the recently subrnittedapplicantrs plan (Piper 3/5/97). The owner will_ beresponsibl-e for constructing these improvements:
11
a.
b.
d.
f.
c.
Relocation of spruce tree or replacenent of thetree if it is not feasible to relocate. The sizeand type of tree must be the Eame as the existingtree, 25t, spruce.
Dry stack river rock walls and planters will beused in all improvements. This style wilL matchthe existing rock walLs on Will-ow Bridge. Wroughtiron railing will be added on top of the rock willalong the creek bank.
Four to six 3" caliper balsam poplars wiII be addedin various planting areas in the-plan.
Three to four aspen and one to two evergfeens willbe added adjacent to the retocated spruce tree.
e. Two to three seating benches five feet long sinilarto the corsuch bench or BelI Tower benches will beplaced in the plan.
Pavers and concrete according to the plan usingeither Piper Architects or Jeff Winston's designscheme for the paver and concrete pattern.Unistone hexagonal pavers, rectangular brickpavers, or granite nay be conbined to create theproposed paver and cement patterns for thewalkway.
Flowers and shrubs for planters. Trees may beadded to the planters.
Relocation of existing shrubs along the westelevation of the existing building to Gore Creekbank.
Drainage system associated with the improvenentsand roof drainage problens.
Structural support and grade beam for thepedestrian plaza expcinsicn.
The Town will be responsible for maintaining theimprovements on Town of VaiI land. The Town Councilrnust also give final approval to the irnprovernentsproposed to be on Town of VaiI property before DesignReview Board approval is final . please see the enclosedPrelininary Landscape Drawings (piper, 3/S/87 and,Winston, 3/3/87).
s.
h.
J..
l.
I2
D
tie
9Jip9f
P.r
ss
c1
EE
d{;tc,
1- -..
i5
ET.r&
t.
q
u
riq
:0
6I{I
Eq
**
BG$$*rIr
;
Holo
H,l'lVfc$*
, .gJ.t._f}r t- 3Ll - 6'.7t,ir'- \J .dll -n - 2*L'
t/i dt;,
fl,- r^g
,11 . t
y'a
:-t
f'
x.\*\\)-
n$$
l$9
,h
ds6'',e+E-?2
*a-C.ts+t#II
,
lI
oi
{.
3. At Design Revlew Board review, the owner will grrbnit aplan for roof drainage.
At the tine of building pernit, the owner wlll cubnLt awritten legal-agreernent -tiputating the Improvencnts andcostg which will be.covered by the otrner concernlng thepedeetrlan plaza, eldewallc and landEcape Lnprovcucnteand will provide a letter of, credlt to-covei tho costEof the lnprovenents.
At the tine of buildlng permit, a revocable rlght-of-waypennit wlll be subrnitted for alt encroachnents on tounof Vail property.
The applicant will agree to particlpate in and nottreuonstrate against a Vail Village lmprovenent dl.Etrlctif and shen one is formed
5.
5.
13
tvi:{':
L::!'4.':a31
{'-l K;i:$
{rg xf e{lLrr lfr (aorL. e-6L.
Tr.ia5 FifEF$Anvt' )
FA^NP A}A'N
f2eurqiruqe\ 06le l.J
Scal€:1'-lO.
-I
-
3 MARCH 1987
CORE CREEK PROMENADT,
Town'of Vail
glNFXAAE*H
lil'. isf.'".ot I I i 5l mil
(303)..0-o2oo
i/lln
,-Tq{,.a*2adn
l1
lrtar\\
W7*:,
,r+''itc
.r@a rbtL
@!1q2. f*lt e-,.
ffiff6n
4>@..a9t4P
"X'19^'
^F* d/1uwt
td*.qotafrftf ,llar)+
>, €1b4 ba.t *-
P.p lim{.,ac'l'fffio-npe PLAN
.:
:
I.t{'r-s
a'aA€ Vi11.12,1A:eT I arrcPs1
+ffie *Fct
flp, Ar,ISe.*rr{*,8 31f,/8+
o
Planning and Environrnental Conmission
Ir{arch 9, I9g7
1:30 P.M. Site Visits
3:O0 P.M. Public Hearinq
1. Approval of minutes of rneeting of February 23.
2. A request for a front setback variance, a variance fronrequired roof slope, and an amendment to the ArterialBusiness District circulation plan in order to constructa building at L031 South Frontage Road.Applicant: VaiI Conmercial partnership
3. A request for an exterior altertion and for a densitycontrol variance in order to construct an addition tothe Sitzmark Lodge.Applicant: Sitznark Lodgeb Fritch
4. Proposed revision to the Urban Design Guide plan and arequest for an exterior alteration in order to constrirctan addition to the plaza Lodge building.Applicant: Plaza Lodge Associates, Ltd.
5. A request for a conditional use perrnit in order toconstruct an addition to the Learning Tree preschool
located at 1_29 North Frontage Road.Applicant: Learning Tree preschool
6. A request for front and side setback variances in orderto construct two dwelling units on parcel A, aresubdivision of Lots t4 and l.Z, VaiI Village FirstFiling.Applicant: Michael Tennenbaum
lo:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&'ECT:
Planning and Environrnental Conmission
Corununity Developrnent Departnent
March 9, L987
A reguest for a density variance in order to add threeadditional accomnodation units to the Sitzrnark Lodge.Applicant: Sitzmark Lodge/Mr. Bob Fritch
I.T}IE PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting to add three addltional
accommodation units on the northwest corner of the SltznarkLgdge. Presently, 32 acconmodation units and one dwellingunit or a total of L7 dwelling units exist on the irroperty(2.,a.u. are equal to 1d.u.). The CCI zoning allows 10dwelling units which neans that the project is al.ready ?dwelling units over the allowable and is considered to be agrandfathered legal nonconforning situation. The proposedaddition of three accornrnodation units would increase thetotal nunber of acconmodation units to 35. The addition ofthe existing dwelling unit plus 35 accommodation unitscreates a total density of 18.5 dwellinq units. The proposalresults in a density variance of 1.5 dwelLing units for theproperty. The foll.owing zoning statistics sunrnarlzes thedensity situation for the property:
Density: (25 units per acre)
ALlowed dwelling units: L0 du or 20 auExisting density: 1 du + 32 au = L7 duProposed: I du + 35 au = L8.5 du
GRFA: tieotAllowed: L4,2O7 sfExisting: Il_,362Renaining 2,845 sf
Addition:
2nd floor w. existing. au = 1L0 sfe. exis',-j.ng. .au = 75 sf
3rd floor
hlest new au = 455 sfeast new au = 405 sfw. existing au = 11O sfe. existing au = 75 sf
4th floor
new auw. existinge. existing
TotaI Lr835 sf new GRFA
on :,-r.riew of Criteria and Find Section 18.62.06O ofe Mun l Code e Departmen Conmun Developnentrecomnencts approval of the resues varlance sed upon thefollowinq factors:
Consideration of Factors:
A.The relationship of the requested variance to otherexlsE -ng or potenli.al usvicinitv.
The addition of the three new lodge roons on the northerevation of the project does increase the mass and burkof the building (please see north elevation attached).
au
au
- 42O sf
= LLo sf
= 75sf
GRFA remaining after addition, I,O1_O sf
,, /..:',
II. BAeK.Pl,rrlrn _?I TrIE__!I2UE!:
In July.of 1984, the Sitznark reguested an exterioralteration approval for the pool and conmercial addition onthe south side of the property. rn order for the conmercialaddition to be feasible, it wls necessary that three exisiinqaccommodation units be removed. rn order for a lod,ge roorn t6be removed in Commercial Core I, it is required that acondicional use request be approved. The conditionaL userequest hras approved by the pEc. The staff stated in tbenemo that rrwhile the Town does not rike to see rodge roomsrenoved from the Village, we on the other hand, ar6encouraging the commercial expansion of this site. Theremoval of the lodge rooms is a necessary evil of thisproposal with the overall impact on the Townrs developmentobjectile_being a positive one.r' The urban Design cuide planspecifisally stated that a conmerciar expansion on thisportion'of the property wourd be very po-sitive. The staffsupported the conditional use request due to the fact thatthe urban Design Guide plan carred for the conmercialexpansion and that a trade-off was being made for the loss ofthe lodge rooms with additionar retair ipace and a pool areafor guests.
IIT. CRTTERTA AND FTNDINGS
However, it is felt that this infill is cornpatible withthe existing project and actually creates a more gradualrrterracing" of the building down to WilLow Bridge Road.The height of the fourth floor accommodation unit at itsgreatest point is 43 feet. This level steps down to athird floor accomnodation unit that has a height ofapproxinately 33 feet. The west end is approxinately25r high in the area of the office expansion. The rnassof this infill also does not have significant negativeirnpacts in respect to sun/shade patterns. According tothe sunr/shade analysis, shade is cast fron this additioninto the creek itself. Only a small portion of shade isactually cast onto the pedestrian bridge.
Views are also not significantly impacted by theaddition, as a portion of the building already extendsup behind ttre area of the infill. The additi.on willinfill the area in front of this high point on the southside of the bui-lding. Generally, the staff believesthat this infi1l will not have a negative impact onadjacent uses or structures in the area.
B.The deqree to which relief frorn the strict or literalinterpretation and enforcenent of a specified requlations necessary to achieve conpatibility and unifornitv oftreatment amo sites n the vicinity or to attain the
obi ectives of e without nt of speciaprrvrlege.
In 1984, the applicant voluntarily decreased the densityfor this project which in turn decreased the degree ofnonconfornity in density for this zone district. Theapplicant is now requesting to add the three units thatwere originally lost in the comrnercial expansion in1984. In essence, the building is being brought back tothe same level of nonconformity that previously existedbefore tbe corunercial expansion. Staff does notconsider this density variance to be a grant of specialprivilege, as the applicant is only asking to add lodge
rooms which hrere previously in existence before the
comrnercial expansion was conpteted. It should aLso benoted that the Urban Design Guide Plan called out forthe commercial expansion.
In addition, the applicant does have nore GRFA rights.It would be possible to atually expand the existinglodge rons (thereby adding the proposed mass) into thearea of the proposed addition without a densityvariance. If the mass is added, we prefer the option ofadditlonal roorns for the guest, rather than rnerelyenlarging existing rooms. Staff believes that theaddition is aesthetically cornpatible with the rest ofthe bullding and will. have no negative impacts on thefactors listed above.
c.
D.
Tle, ef.fegf of lhe re n liqht ana air,qi stribyt ion of _ppopula! i_on, transportatioir and- tiafElcfagilities, public facilities and utilitlEE,- and-EuElIEsatetv
The effect upon fight and air is addressed under III. A.
The staff believes that the Land Use plan states goalsand.objectives which support this type of a densii,yvariance as.Iong as the additionaf density is conpitiblewith.the existing building and Urban oesignConsiderations, and is not considered to be a. grant ofspecial privilege. The Land Use plan states ii itsGoals and Policies section:
Section 3.1. The hotel bed base should be preserved andused more efficiently.
Section 3.2. The ViIIage and Lionshead areas are thebest location for hotels to serve the future needs ofthe destination skiers.
Section 4.2. Increased density in the core areas isacceptable so long as the existing character of eacharea is preserved through irnplernentation of the UrbanDesign Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master plan.
These goals were developed through a series of publicmeetings and input fron both the planning Conmi-ssion andTown Council. This request supports these policystatements.
rv.
Such other factols and criteria as the commissj-on deemsapplicable to the piopoEed-vailance.
FINDTNGS
The Plann and Environnental Comrnission shalll nake theollowincr f ngs before qran a varlance:
That the granting of the variance wirl not constitute a grantof special privilege inconsistent with the lirnitations oiother properties classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrinental tothe public health, safety or welfare, or materially injuriousto properties or irnprovenents in the vicinity.
Related l icies
V.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of thefollowing reasons:
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe specified regulation would result in practicaldifficulty or unnecessary physical hardship -inconsistentwith the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinry circurnstances orconditions applicable to the site of the variance thatdo not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe specified regulation would deprive the applicant ofpriviJ,eges enjoyed by the owners of other properties inthe sane district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approval of the request. ft should benoted that it is very difficult to associate a physicalhardship with a density vari-ance. It is felt that thevariance is warranted more so due to extraordinary
circumstances related to the reguest.
Staff believes that this density variance should be supportedfor some very specific reasons which include:
1. The Sitzrnark is in a very unique situation in that theproperty actually had the three accommodation units atone time and ended up removing the units to add. acornmercial expansion which was called out by the UrbanDesign Cuide PIan. Certainly, the staff understandsthat the owner was not forced to rernove these units, butthat the choice was made to construct the conmercialexpansion and lose the three units. The applicant isrequesting only three rooms which will not exceed theoriginal nonconformity of the building.
2. The property has existing GRFA which could be used toexpand the Lodge. The fact that additional GRFA isavailable means that the mass and bulk of the buildingcould be j.ncreased without any variances as long as the
Urban Design Considerations are met. Staff believesthat it is a greater conmunity good to actually addadditional high guality lodge rooms than to nerely
expand onto existing units. New high quality lodge
rooms are a use that the public supported in the Land
Use Plan and Village Study discussions.
3. The additions are aesthetically conpatible with tbeexisting project. More importantly, the expansion does
meet the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations. Thisis an important part of our opinion that the project
should be approved.
For the abovE reasons, staf,f, f,eers that the density varlance ehouldbe supported. We reaLLze that the positlon ie an unueual one comparcdto our past recomnendations. However, we aleo feel very stronglythat there are special cj-rcumstances that relate to thib particulardensity variance that make it supportable.
:
:g
-Pic!
dE<'6
E
€
trFfrol_.A
.:J
::---{:i-_--e
#Ye
vsl
->-rPt-
\;
lFP..Q
f,#cg$ss
J!
.^tdtnal;t -i-co
'fiirTi'/$.
l"-".=' I,|
o
Planning and Environmental Cormission
December 8, 1986
?:15
3:00
PM
PM
Site Inspections
Publ ic Hearing
't.
2.
Approval of minutes of November 24, 1986
Consideration of a request for a minor amendment to the
Hong Kong Cafe development plans for the Iocation ofthe alley gate
Applicant: The American Ski Exchange/Hong Kong Cafe
Appeal of staff decjsion concerning the ,i nterpretationof street level at the Sjtzmark LodgeApplicant: Bob Frjtch
Prelininary review of exterior alteration proposals forthe fol I ow'ing bui 1d'ings:
/
./3.
4.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.f.
g.
Clock Tower
Casino Building
Plaza Lodge
BeI I Tower
Lionshead Center
Si tzmark
Hong Kong Cafe
o
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Byran Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
Duane Piper
Sid Schultz
Jim Viele
ABSENT
Pam Hopkins
The meeting was
l. Approval
A correction was made on item #3. Donovan
the minutes with the correction. The vote
called to order by the chairman, Duane Piper.
of minutes of November 24. 'l 986.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
12/8/86
cotil4I ss I0N
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Betsy Rosolack
moved and Viele seconded to approve
was 6-0 in favor.
?.Consideration of a re uest for
eveloDment pl ans for o caE
e
Tom Braun explained
the request as long
The vote was 6-0 in
m] nor amendment to the Hon
ono e atte ate.
the request. Byran Hobbs moved and
as the Hong Kong restaurant agreed
favor .
Cafe
an qe
Viele seconded to grant
with the request.
3.lof ff decision con rntn the inter retation of street lev
at the
Duane Piper mov e audience and Jim Viele chaired this item. Peter
Patten explained that the Sjtzmark wanted to expand an existing office space
which the staff believes is a nonconforming use because the space is on thefirst or street level . He pointed out that there were many situatjons similar
to the one at Sitzmark, such as the Plaza Lodge shops, the east side of the
Bell Tower Building and the Fountain Cafe in the Creekside Building. The
applicant is appealing the interpretation of street'l evel and feel the officeis on the second leve] .
Duane Piper, representing the applicant, felt this was more a consideration of
degree. He felt that many of the examples shown to be similar were less
extreme than that of the Sitzmark, the greatest difference in grade being 4' as
opposed to the 8 feet at the Sitzmark. He added that if this was first f1oor,
then there rnust be a basement. Piper stated that there needed to be a more
definitjve explanation in the zoning code, for the street was well below the
street 'l eve'l .
Sid Schultz said that it was difficult to look at the zoning code and try to
apply floor'l eve'l s as therein described. He fe'l t that street leve1 s could be a
I
at a number of different ]evels in different places, but that the intent of the
code was to have retail shops near the pedestrians. with the des'ign of the
bern, the jntent at the Sitzmark was to get people off of the street. If the
berm were renoved, and shops placed at berm level , he would see it as street
l evel .
Diana Donovan agreed with the staff memo. Byran Hobbs absta.ined. peggy
0sterfoss stated that she would'l ike to see the code clarified, thattechnically, if one has to walk up I steps, it would be 2nd level, but she fe'ltthat the intent of the code was to interpret this as first level . She repeatedthat she would l'i ke to see a rewording of the definition. Jin viele agreedthat the definition needed to be cleaned up, but in the meantime would go alongwith the staff interpretation.
Diana Donovan moved and econded to u hol d the staff
rDretati on .e vote was EOU on wit
stent i ons .
4.Prg_liryinar.v review of exterior alteration proposals for the followinq
bui I di nss:
BUI LDING LENGTH OF STUDY PERIlN
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Cl ock Tower
Casino Bujlding
Plaza Lodge
Bel I Tower
Lionshead Center
Sitzmark Lodge
60
60
90
90
90
90
days
days
days
days
days
days
PEC t2/8/86 -2-
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
12/8/86
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Byran Hobbs
Peggy Osterfoss
Duane Piper
Sid Schultz
Jim Viele
ABSENT
FIE-6pkins
The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Duane
Approval of minutes of November 24. 1986.
A correction was made on item #3.
the minutes with the correction.
Donovan moved and
The vote was 6-0 in
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Betsy Rosol ack
Pi per.
Viele seconded to approve
favor.
3.
2.Consi derati on of a reou Kono Cafe
e I opmen ans tor ev qate.
an
Tom Braun exp'lained the request. Byran Hobbs moved and Viele seconded to grant
the request as'long as the Hong Kong restaurant agreed with the request.
The vote was 6-0 in favor.
taff decision concernin the inter retati fst
cant:
Duane Piper moved to the audience and Jim Viele chaired this item. Peter
Patten explained that the Sitzmark wanted to expand an existjng office space
which the staff believes is a nonconforming use because the space is on thefirst or street level . He pointed out that there were many situations similar
to the one at Sitzmark, such as the Plaza Lodge shops, the east side of the
Bell Tower Building and the Fountain Cafe in the Creekside Bui'l ding. The
applicant is appealing the interpretation of street'l eve'l and feel the officeis on the second level .
Duane Piper, representing the applicant, felt this was more a consideration of
degree. He felt that many of the examples shown to be similar were less
extrene than that of the Sitzmark, the greatest difference in grade being 4' as
opposed to the 8 feet at the Sjtzmark. He added that if this was first f1oor,
then there must be a basement. Piper stated that there needed to be a more
definitive explanat'i on in the zoning code, for the street was well be'l ow the
street level .
Sid Schultz said that it was difficult to 'l ook at the zoning code and try to
apply f1 oor levels as therein described. He felt that street levels could be a
at a number of different'l evels in different places, but that the intent of the
code was to have retail shops near the pedestrians. lJjth the design of the
berm, the intent at the Sitzmark was to get people off of the street. If the
berm were removed, and shops placed at berm level, he would see it as street
I evel .
Djana Donovan agreed with the staff memo. Byran Hobbs abstained. Peggy
0sterfoss stated that she would'l ike to see the code clarified, thattechnically, if one has to walk up 8 steps, it would be Znd 1eve1 , but she felt
that the intent of the code was to interpret this as first level . She repeatedthat she would l'ike to see a rewording of the definitjon. Jim Viele agreed
that the definjtjon needed to be cleaned up, but in the meantime would go alongwith the staff interpretat'ion.
Diana Donovan Sid Schultz secon hol d
nterpretati on.tewas4tou
abstenti ons.
4. Pre'l iminary review of exterior alteration proposals for the followinq
bui I di ngs:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.f.
BUI LDING
C'l ock Tower
Casino Building
Plaza Lodge
Bell Tower
Lionshead Center
Sitzmark Lodge
LENGTH OF STUDY PERIOD
60
60
90
90
90
90
days
days
days
days
days
days
PEC L2/8/86 -2-
75 louth lrontago road
rall, colorrdo 81657
(303) 476.7000
0ctober 1, 1986
olflce of communlty developmenl
Mr. Bob Fritch
Sitzmark Lodge
182 East Gore Creek Drive
Vai'1, Colorado 81657
Re: Determination of designation of first floor real estate space
Dear Bob:
I am writing this letter to explain to you how the staff determined that theoffice space (now a ga1 lery) is located on a first f'l oor leve'l at the
Sitzmark. The Conmercial Core I zone district (Section 18.24.020) defines
basement or garden leve'l as "that floor of a building that is entirely orsubstantially below grade." The first floor is defined as "that floor of the
build'ing that is located at grade or street level." (18.24.030) The secondfloor is defined as "the second floor above grade within a structure."(18.24.040) Staff's opinion js that the location of the office space does not
meet the definjtions for basement or second floor'l evels. Our opinion is that
the yogurt shop is on a basement or garden level . In between the basementlevel and second floor is the location of the potentjal real estate office.It is not possible to have two fl oors from the yogurt shop up to the office
space so that the office would be on the second floor. This .sjtuatjon makes
he office first floor space.
Please note that the office spaceis not resumed within a year from
use wi l'l no I onger be al I owed.
I know that this is a complicated
questions on our decision, please
Si ncerely,
t) | {)l{:-L^.^ Y2Drlrur\ I iltL
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP: brcc: Duane Piper
is a non-conforming use. If the office use
when 'i t was nemoved this surmer, the office
explanation! If you have any further
feel free to call me.
oo
P
(E
-r-f r ftc
- l){< "f,,l'/ r '
/J.'t , / /TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPL I CANT:
Planning and Environmenta'l Comnission
Cormunity Development Department
December 8, .|986
Appeal of staff decision concerning thefirst level at the Sitzmark Lodge.
Bob Fritch
L(rl
/-,) - '
interpretation of street or
The owners of the Sitzmark Lodge have submitted an exterior alteration requestwhich includes:
t. Add three lodge rooms, averaging approximately 450 square feet each, for atotal area of 1364 square feet.
2. Expand 6 existing lodge rooms from a current size of 350 square feet to an
average of 445 square feet each. The total expansion would be 576additional sguare feet in area.
3. e second floor to 725 square feet.This is an addition of 2ffi
The applicant is appealing the staff decjsion that the office space on the west
end of the Sitzmark Lodge is on the first floor as opposed to the second floor.Staff believes that the office space is a nonconforming use, as offjces are not
a'l 'lowed on the first f'l oor under Commercial Core I zoning. For this reason, theoffjce space may not be expanded as proposed. The owner contends that the office
space is second level as "evidenced by the fact that the floor is 8 feet abovethe adjacent street" and therefore may be expanded. Please see the enclosedsectjon of the zoning code on nonconform.ing uses and des.ign drawings.
STAFF INTERPRETATION
In the zoning code, a first floor is defined as "that floor of the bui'l.ding thatis located at grade or street'l evel ," (Section 18.24.030) The second floor js
defined as "the second floor above grade within a structure." The existingoff]ce is clearly at grade. It is true that the street and grade adjacent to thebujlding differ approximately by 8 feet, However, the definition states thatfjrst floor is located at grade or street level . There is no floor between theex.istinggradeandtheffiis]ocationtobedesignatedasa
second floor space.
Situations sjmilan to the Sitzmark exist throughout the Village which requirepedestrians to wa1 k up several stairs to reach the entrance to a shop. Examplesof similar situations jnclude the Plaza Lodge shops, Mill Creek Court Building onthe south side, the Covered Bridge Store, the east side of the Bell Tower
Building adjacent to the children's Fountain, and the Fountajn cafe jn the
creekside Building. If the sitzmark office space'i s considered to be on the
second f1 oor, then the other properties cited would also have the potential to
convert sjmilar spaces to office use. Staff feels that to interpret the
Sitzmark space as second f'loor wou'ld be a misinterpretation of the code,sdefinition that first floor space is "that f]oor of the building located atgrade or street leve'l ." In addition the location does not meet-the definitionof second level space, as it is not on the "second f'loor above grade withln astructure." The space is c1 early on the first'level at grade. -For thesereasons, staff recomends that our interpretation be upheld.
,1 \
Y
\s
\
\
\
\
o o
i
!
t-+
i-+
I
I
IIJrp
'$
{
tduH
o
NoN(.()Nt;ottIilN(; st l.t,s. usf..s. sTRU(.,ttJtil:5
tlrcir unlrrgcrnent, thcir reestablishment alicr abandonmcnt.irrrtl thcir rr:storlrion trl.tcr sulrstuntiatr't.,.sinrctron. Whilurrc"rittir! rr.rrc.rr rtr r'irg us'Js. strrctr,r;.. ,;;' irn pr.vcrncr tsl() e()lltlnuc. this ehuptcr is intcnrlcrl ,., ii,ni, cnlar!:unlcnl.i.lltct-uti()n. rrst()ritti()n, or rcpltrccrtrcnt rvhich ,u.r,,tr'i inaraar" ft,*rliscrcpuncy trctrvucn cxistirrg .u,.r.tiri.riir"u,,r,i'ii.r* a.urtnpu1.,,,slundultls prcscribcri lrl,rlris ritlc. (Orrl.8il.i;-f i'S 10. 100. I
IlJ.(r4.010 (.'ontinuatrce.
..-.-Nonconlbt.ntin.s.. :itr:s, .. _rrse,s. structrrrcs. antl sitcrrrrpr'vcr'c'ls I:rr'tirilv r:st:r.trrisrrcd prior to trrc ctrectivc dut.j<li.lltc ortlinancc codit'ir:tt in.rtris.ritlc ;1, .;;;;;,:: subjecr ro t1climil at.ions prcscribcd in,this chuptc r. sit.i.
"*.r.,,ructrr rcs. uu(lsi te r'provcrrrc' r.s lurv tirll).. arur'orizc. bt ;;;;;;". resut't i()r rrr:xisting
'rior
to t'e ertectivc rratc or trr. irr,iinu,.t.. c.tririctr irrtltis title rnay conrinuc. sLrbjcct tr: *,,cf'' f imltatini's as prcscribcrll'ry such pcrmirs or rcgularions. (()rd. Sfl qi.;l .i-jtj.:00.,
18.64 030 Sitcs.
Slfus !utvtirllv cstlblishcrl l)rtrsrtiltrt tp r.e:rrrllrtronq rrt r;'i cl
'ri<;r
r. t,c cl-rcetrvc' trritc or trr,: <irrli.ance .".rir:i,.r in rrri:., titrtjrvrric' trrr not corfbrm to trrc. nrrni'rr,r tnt
"r"a',ur,r trirncnsi'rrr0(lu irc rlrcrl ts
'rcscribcd
hr trris rrtrc tbr rt'. ,r-i*iri.t irr rvlriclrtlcy arc situatcd nra1, hc .conrjnue(l *,rr'f ,f.r,iii t*'r'i,cmctl lu,{allycstablished builtlin'-!r sitcs. strlricct ro th,: iii.j t!!.vcl()l)nlcntstundurtrs prescrirrcd lry trris titre' ,'i( ) s'crl .rir.l .-tr,rrt bc rirrlrtcrrutlrrcL'tl in arcu or tlirncnsiorrs. t()rtl. S( f ,)Z: j'i:fj.;OO.f
Itt.6.l.0+0 Usts.
,,,- :,li:,.1i,:"'11,,;.'iii J;::ft1:i;i.J.::,illlt,i,,ill;,';li;l'i;l,lt,llii,li;
(lr)!'\ ltol cOnti)nn f() tlluri,r rrrc tlisrricr in ,,, ,.,.J"t,",.,"'.,ili;lJl:.i'.;l:il,,il.,:l,l;;;,lli
Ittttvitlctl lhat rro srrclt rloneon.lorrrrilr trsc .'l1ill 1.,., ur.tl:rr:.:rrl lrrot!Ul)\' it -L:fUiltrj .,tt0 lrrUl li,p lrttrltltt.tg lloog .11g1g ll.r:rtr rt!)rer'ie(i rrt tlre e 'ccti'r: ri:r1.. ,,1 tlre,rrtlitt:rrrcc..,,,lili.,r.l ,rr tlris','it.r;rs1'1. .'\rrr srrlr:crluunt rc(i{r(rrr)1 ,,, ;,i.: :;.,,; ,,r ll,r.r .rr(,.r
I s;.1_ |r\ .rl .r l , 'sl
o
NONCONFORNIINC SITES, USES, STRUCTURES
Usr .t.
X occupied hy a nonconforming use shalt be deemed a netv
limitatiorr, and thc usr: slrlll not tlrcreallcr be enlarged to
occupy I greater sitc arca rlr floor arca than strch nerv
limitittion. (Ord. 8(1971) S 10.-100.)
18.64.050 Structures and site improvement.
Stnrcturcs and site improygm..,r lawlirlly established prior
to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title rvhichdo not conform to tlle (lcvclopmont standarcls prescribed by
this title lor the district in rvhich they ure situatecl may be
cor-rtinued. Such structurcs ur site improvemen$ rnay ba
enlargccl only in accordrncc rvith the lbllorving limitations:A. Stnrcturcs or site improvements which do not conform to
requircments tbr sethacks. distances between buildings,
height, building bulk control, or site coverage, may be
enlurged, provided that the enlargement does not further
increase the discre'pancy between the totat structure and
applicable building bulk control or site coverage standards:and provided that the addition tllly conforms wirh
setbacks. rlist:rnces betwcen buildings, end hcight st:rndurds
applicab lc to thc addition.
B. Strtrcturcs rr,l'Lich tlo rrot eontbrm to tlensitv controls mav
be cnlargcd. only if thij totirl gross resitlenti.l tloo, arca oithe enlurged stnlcturc docs ntlt excce<l thc. totil sross
rcsiclential t'loor lre:.r rrf thc, precxisting nonconfor-ming
structur9.
C. Strtrettrrcs t-rt stlr' itnprlrvL'rnents rvhicli do not confbrnl to
lcquirclllL'llts tilr Ltscalll,: r)p{jn sl):lce or landsclnirrg ancl site
tlcvclol;rnr-'nl rnuy bc ,:nllrrgctl. provirlcd tlttt tllc [rsr.xble
opon splt.c rc(ltltrcnlenrs appliclblc to such :rddition shall belirlll' s:rttrlir'rl. irnd pr()\'i(lc(l tlltt the rdrucnlts!.6i tlc tofal
sllc \vlllr lr t\ li l(i)ctLl)etl ;l|irll nol l': rcduc,,'rl lrcIorv ihc
lll ttl t lll l ll ll | ",lt t CrnClt(.
D. Strrte tttt,., r,1 .11g illlrryyurlcrrts r,.,hich do not d()ntbrnl totlrr ttll^lr '.r |,rrkrnu Jrrrr Ir,rrrinr: r!-quirclncnis or' rhis titrcl., r!rt\!,rr.r._...._ ,,r .rrrr rrftg
"1,1.r,,..,,,.11
,, .,,1 l,rr,r.rrl\'(l tlrlt thc. plrkinu :rntl ltxtiinsr."t;ttt;tlt',"r r',, ,,.'1, ",1,1,ti,,,, ihall lru ri,rr" ,,,r,rro,i'"ui
i1ilf i[,:',,,,,,:]i'''l,l:;:::J,'ll J'xlili;*';iii,i;::i'ilil:i,ltlttr .rr,l llrr, .,luntl.rr.is IrusCrtll,:rl ltf, this
.tri5 . V;trl l -5-tf I
o
"t- o- \
_--bs-
; _uLJ
- LJ .P- Tr* I, ^!14-)-,+,^,ttff- -,.^Ir*'+ /l M
(/
"-.7-fur
I Project Application
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phon6
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
Comments:
Design Review Board
APPROVAL DISAPPROVALt)\ - .-+'-,_l
Summary:
"",", \n/ L\ l r+
--- Yt 'tr'
75 3oulh tronlage ?oad
vail. colo.ado 81657
(303) 476-7000 olflce of communlly development
August 25, L987
Mr. Bob Fritch
Sitzmark Lodge
183 core Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Parking fee for Sitzmark Rernodel , permit # Zgee, Sunmer
L9a7
Dear Bob:
Attached to this letter is a revised parking fee analysis forthe Sitzmark remodel . Due to the fact that Unit L05 is nowconfirmed as a dwelling unit, the parking fee has been slightlyadjusted. The expansion of dwelling Unit rOs by L1S squarefeet did not increase the size of the unit to the point wtrerean additional parking space hras necessary. For this reason, fhave adjusted the total residential space reguirernent to 2.894spaces. This changes the original residential space fee from
$15,045 to $14,47O. The new total parking fee ii 527,6'70instead of $28,24s. I have also revised ihe parking agreernentto reflect this change.
I^f yog have any further guestions about these revisions, pleasefeel free to call me.
Enclosure
KP:br
fJ
.r aaa
t
REVISED
SIT!{,ARK BUTLDTNG PERMIT CHECK A/25/A7
PARKTNG
USE SQ. FT
East Retail 540 sf)west Retail 297 sf Totat t_o92Corner RetaiL 255 sf)
office zo7 sf
Total Cornmercial Spaces
Accourmodation Unit Additions
#104 77 sf)*2L2 77 sfl#2L4 lls sf)#3L2 77 sf)#31-4 li.s sf)
SPACES
3.5
.8
4.4
.46L
.79A
.837
.798
Spaces 2.a94
New Accomnodation Units
#216 398 sf#2L8 437 sf#316 398 sf
Total Residential
DwelJ_ing,unit Addition
#105 1l-5 sf New square footage
does not increase theunit to a point whereadditional parking isrequired. Existing
square footage 364 sfplus l-15 sf = 479 sf. 0
Commercial- Space = $3,ooo/spaceResidential Space = $5r000/space
(Total conm. spaces) x (conm. space cost) = (cornm. park fee)4.4 spaces x $3 , 000 = $l_3 r 200
(Total resid. spaces) x (res. space cost) = (res. park fee)2.894 spaces x $5r000 = SL4,47O
TOTAL PARKTNG FEE FOR
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL EXPANSIONS = 927,670
REVISED PARKING
8/25/87
FEE
BIdg Permit # 2988
BJ-dg. Permit Sunrner 1987Property:
$ 27,670
Sitzmark Proj ect:
Total Parking Fee
In installments after date, for val_ue received, I pronise topay to the order of the Tohrn of VaiI at the office of theFinance Director, Municipal Building at Vail, Colorado,
flrentl-sgyen Thousa dred Seventv Dollars,Tota1 Parking Fee
Down Paynent 5,549.0O (Due before receiving buildingpermit. )
with interest of ten percent per annum on the unpaid balance,payable in yearly installments as follows:
Future Installments
The first installment of 96,946.99 due and payable on 7/2L/BB,
The second installment of 9G,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/8g
The third installment of 96,946.98 due & payable on 7/Zt/gO
The forth installment of 96,946.9a due & payable on 7/zL/gL
rt is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or d.ecrareddue hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon sharldraw interest at the rate of 18 percent per annun, and thatfailure to make any payrnent of piincipal or interest to becounted as principal , at the option of the holder of the note.The rnakers and endorsers hereof severalry waive presentment forpa].nent, protest, notice on nonpalment and of protest, andagree to any extension of tine of payment and partial paymentsbefore, at or after naturity, and if this note or interestthereon is not paid when due, or suit is brought, agree to payaLl- reasonabLe costs of collection, including reasonableattorney,s fees.
,.<^ J7- .za.z
by:
.t'
I
Property: Sitznark
i 27,670Total Parking Fee
In installments after date,pay to the order of the TownFinance Director, Municipal
REVTSED PARKING
8/ 2s/ 87
Proj ect:
for valuof Vail-
BuiIding
Hundred
o
&il,
P'lcoe-
p^4'r
{1,*'k'.
{tirfa'r
-lrh,o evistJ
Twenty-seven Thousand, Six
Par Fee
Down Paynentpermit. )
(Due before receiving building
with interest of ten percent per annun on the unpaid balance,payable in yearJ-y installrnents as follows:
Future Installments
The first installment of 96,946.98 due and payable on 7/2L/88,
The second installment of 96,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/89
The third installment of 96,946.99 due & payable on 7/2L/gO
The forth installment of 96,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/gL
by:
rt is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared.due hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shalldraw interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum, and thatfailure to make any payment of principal-- or interest to becounted as principal, at the option of the holder of the note.The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive presentment forpalment, protest, notice on nonpalzment and of protest, andagree to any extension of tine of paynent and partial paymentsbefore, at or after maturity, and if this note-or inte-reitthereon is not paid when due, or suit is brought, agree to payalL reasonable costs of collection, including-reasonableattorneyrs fees.
Date
tt'sts il)l[l:tc F{
Til,i fr>
Bldg Perrnit #
Property: SITZI'IARK
Vai1, colorado,
In installments after date, for value received,
order of the Town of Vai] at the Office of the
Building at VaiJ., colorado'
N,..\\
PROJECT BLDG PERMIT SIJMMER L987
, L987
I promise to paY to the
Finance Director, ltunicipal
(Due before receiving building perrnit.
fLt-r,':;.1- Splx 1-]tt*,4 fi': ilt'''t''t ri kl;^i7
.6en$'r-'e;i ive Dol}arsr tTotal Parking Fee \U
Down Payment
with interest of tenyearly installments
Future Installments:
Tbe fi.rst .t- - |LCI I
percent per annum on
as folfows:
7,?T6EF
I
$the unpaid balance, payable t. tQ
.luly &/ rgee
\l tsegpayable on;|$|-,
11 or-r i
the second instal-lment of $due and
the third instalrrnent of i ?TI#e due and payabre ot;LJu@ -,tpg,l(",?? . ,.- rl .,the fourth.installment of g iffi:=ae .due and payabre ott'*:ldEl l99l-,
It is agreed, that if ttri= not" is not paid. when due or declared due
hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shall draw interest
at the rate of LB percent per annum, and that failure to rnake any payment
of principal or interest when due or any default under any incurnbrance or
agreement securing this note shall cause the whole note to become due at
once, or the interest to be counted as principal, at the option of the
holder of the note. The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive
presentment for payment, protest, notice on nonpalrrrent and of protest, and
agree to any extension of tine of palment and partial payments before, at,
or after naturi-ty, and if this note or interest thereon is not paid when
due, or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonable costs of colLection,
including reasonable attorneyrs fees.
7t zo
7-2/-r>
D;u rt-u-r ({c?72
J&,oa / 7t, 96,F,^azc,a-1/
ttt!1|'t I
, 7/t.r/
3l {7o
7'7 {,
Jb P32
13 Fucq,,
Jo rt.(l
;;2.-
* -J-UI!-! J
'l r-
75 rcuth fronlege road
Yell, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 offlcs of communlty developmcnl
August 25, 1987
Mr. Bob FritchSitznark Lodge
183 core Creek DriveVail , Colorado 81657
Re: Parking fee for Sitznark Renodel, permit # ZSAA, Summer
L987
Dear Bob:
Attached to this letter is a revised parking fee analysis forthe sitzrnark remodel . Due to the facl that-unit to5 -is nowconfirmed as a dwelling unit, the parking fee has been srightlyadjusted. The expansion of dwelli-ng unif ros by 115 squarefeet did not increase the size of the unit to tlre poin€ wherean additionat parking space was necessary. For this reason, rhave adjusted the totar-residential spac6 requirement to 2.ag4spaces. This changes the original residentiil space fee from$15,045 to $ta,47o. The new total parking fee i-s i27,670:tnsteact of 928 '24s. r have also revised the parking agreementto reflect this change.
I^f Y"l have any further questions about these revisions, pleasefeel free to call me.
Sincerelv,r) | 'A'
)/, .l l/. \5Y1a,l^ - Y-fr
t\lul(,\(\ t{r\tKristan'PritL
fown Planner
Enclosure
KP: br
t. -
USE
East Retail
West Retail
Corner Retail
Office
Acconmodation
#104 77 sf)#2L2 77 sf)#2L4 l_15 sf)*3L2 77 sf)#314 11-5 sf)
New Accommodation Units
#2L6 398 sf#2L8 437 sf#316 398 sf
REVISED
STTI.,IARK BUTLDING PERMIT CHECK 8/25187
PARKTNG
sQ. rr
540 sf)
297 sf Total l_09225s sf)
2O7 sf
Tota1 Com:nercial Spaces
unit Additions
SPACES
3.6
.8
4.4
.46L
.798
.837
.798
Spaces 2.894Total Residential
Dwelling Unit Addition
#1os 115 sf New square footage
does not increase theunit to a point whereadditional parking isreguired. Existing
square footage 364 sfplus l-l-5 sf = 479 sf. O
Comnercial Space = $3rOoo/spaceResidential Space = $5rOoolspace
(Total cornm. spaces) x (cornm. space cost) = (cornn. park fee)4.4 spaces x $3, 000 $l-3,200
(Total resid. spaces) x (res. space cost) = (res. park fee)2.894 spaces x $5,000 = 9L4,47O
TOTAL PARKING FEE FOR
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL EXPANSTONS = I27,670
REVISED PARKTNG
8/ 2s/ 87
FEE
Bldg Perrnit # 2988
B1dg. Permit Summer 1987Property: Sitzmark
9 27,670
Proj ect:
Total Parking Fee
In installments after date, for value received, I promise topay to the order of the Town of VaiI at the office of theFinance Director, Municipal Building at Vail, Colorado,
f,welty-sgyen Thous DolJ.ars,Total Parking Fee
Down.Palment 5,649.00rJ. (Due before receiving buildingperrnit.) T
with interest of ten percent per annum on the unpaid balance,payable in yearly installnents as follows:
Future Installments
The first instalhnent of
The second installnent of
The third instalhnent of
The forth installnent of
$6,946.98 due and payable on 7/ZL/88,
S6,946.98 due & payable on 7/2t/89
$6,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/9O
$5,946.98 due & payabJ-e on 7/ZL/9L
rt is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or decrareddue hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shalldraw interest at the rate of i.g percent per annum, and thatfailure to make any palment of principal or interest to becounted as principal , at the option of the holder of the note.The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive presentment forpayment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of protest, andagree to any extension of tine of payment and partial paymentsbefore, at or after naturity, and if this note or inteieltthgreon is not paid when due, or suit is brought, agree to payall reasonable costs of collection, including reasonable
?' '?r' 17
Date
REVISED PARKING
8/2s/ 87
/trO
DD.'
4\u^.k1,
{rirl-a'r
I evisrJ
Property:
s 27,670
Sitznark Proj ect:
Twent -seven Thousand Six Hundred
To Par Fee
Total Parking Fee
fn installments after date, for valupay to the order of the Town of VaiIFinance Director, Municipal Building
Down-Palment 5,649.00fJ, (Due before receiving buirdingperrnit.) T
with interest of ten percent per annum on the unpaid balance,payable in yearly installmentl as follows:
Future Installments
The first installment of 96,946.gB due and. payable on 7/2L/gB,
The second instal-rnent of 96,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/Bg
The third installment of 96,946.99 due & payable on 7/2L/9O
The forth installment of 96,946.98 due & payable on 7/2r/gL
Tt ig agreed that if this note is not paid when due or decrareddue hereunder, the principal and accruld interest thereon snaridraw interest at the rate-of rg percent per annum, and thatfailure to make any palanent of piincipat or interest to becounted as principal , at the option oi the holder of the note.The makers and endorsers hereoi severally waive presentment forpayment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of pr-otest, andlgree to any extension of tiroe of-pal.rnent and iartial'payrnentsbefore, at or after maturity, ana Lr-this note'or inte-re3tthereon is not paid when due, or suit is brought, agree to payall reasonable costs of collection, including-reasonableattorneyrs fees.
O t1';51l, fltky:'6- 67)'i FT
1:({
Bldg Pernit #N$"\
Property: SITZI4ARK PROJECT BLDG PERMIT SUMMER 1987
Vail, Colorado,, L987
In installments after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the
order of the Town of VaiI at the Office of the Finance Director, Municipal
Building at Vail , Colorado,
f1t-r,';' iq- p 7'l^ 1'].t,* ,4 ft " llt''J't ti fi 1; ^r,DoIIars^
\U
I
N)t
C-/(
TotaI Parking Fee
Down Paynent
with interest of tenyearly installments
Future Installrnents:
percenE per
as follows:
(Due before
annum on the
receiving building permit.
unpaid balance, payable in
Fg6EFst installment of
the second install-rnent of $
the third installment of due and payable on LJ'IY J/ i990 ,
' @-r't t,"{Y ' '" ll 'the fourth.installment, of S iEe=ae .due and payable or, /9lE-l-1991-,
It is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared due
hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shall draw interestat the rate of L8 percent per annum, and that failure to make any paynentof principal or interest when due or any default under any incumbrance or
agreement securing this note shall cause the whole note to become due at
once, or the interest to be counted as principal, at the option of the
holder of the note. The rnakers and endorsers hereof severally waive
presentment for payment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of protest, and
agtree to any extension of time of payment and partial payments before, at,or after naturity, and if this note or interest thereon is not paid when
due, or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonable costs of colLection,
including reasonable attorneyrs fees.
\ tZt zo\<------
7-?/-r>
DL, 4-"-r (5'4/72
4,oe t/
]1 o1r- r I
7o e6 f.^uzoaj
,6l'tr
o
75 roulh fronlrgo road
Yall. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 olflce of communlty rlcvcl oprnenl
August 25, L987
Mr. Bob FritchSitzmark Lodge
183 core Creek DriveVail , Colorado 81657
Re: Parking fee for Sitzmark Remodel , permit # 2g!g, Summer
L987
Dear Bob:
Attached to this letter is a revised parking fee analysis forthe Sitzurark remodel . Due to the facL that Unit l_05 is nowconfirmed as a dwelling unit, the parkinq fee has been slightlyadjusted. The expansion of dwelling Unii Los by l1s squarefeet did not increase the size of the unit to the poin€ wherean additional parking space uas necessary. for this reason, Ihave adjusted the total residential spac- reguirement to 2.994spaces. This changes the original residential space fee from$15,045 to $t-4,47o. The new total parking fee il 127,670instead of $28,245. f have also revised ttre parking agreernentto refLect this ctrange.
r^f y"! have any further questions about these revisions, preasefeel free to call_ me.
srncerelv,r) | 1lr{;}"_ v;Ll\llI l/It\ l{ | l#K;i;ix;';;itt
Town Planner
Enclosure
KP:br
REVI SED
SITMARK BUILDING PERMIT CHECK 8/25187
PARKING
USE SQ. FT SPACES
East Retail 540 sf)I{est Retail 29'7 sf Total Lo92 3.6
Corner Retaj-l 255 sf)
Office 2O7 sf .8
Total Commercial Spaces 4.4
Accommodation Unit Additions
#1o4 77 sf)#ztz 77 sf)#zt+ t_Ls sf) .46L#312 77 sf)#31-4 115 sf)
New Acconmodation Units
#2L6 398 sf .798#21-8 437 sf .s37#3L6 398 sf .798
Total Residential Spaces 2.A94
Dwelling Unit Addition
#105 115 sf New square footage
does not increase theunit to a point whereadditional parking is
required. Existing
square footage 354 sfplus 1-15 sf = 479 sf. 0
Commercial Space = $3,Ooo/spaceResidential Space = $5rOoolspace
(Total conm. spaces) x (cornrn. space cost) = (com. park fee)4.4 spaces x $3,000 $L3,2OO
(Total resid. spaces) x (res. space cost) = (res. park fee)
2.a94 spaces x $5,000 = $L4r47o
IOTAL PARKTNG FEE FOR
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL EXPANSIONS : $27,670
REVTSED PARKING
8/2s/87
Property: Sitznark
I 27,670Total Parking Fee
Proj ect:
In instatlments after date, for valupay to the order of the Town of Vail_Finance Director, Municipal Building
Down Palaaentpernit. )
The first install.rnent of
The second installment of
The third installment of
The forth installnent of
ru.,e
ploo4t- 1q&t, *\u, .evi
prJ.,rqb.ft-^+Y
I-]..,f, I \, ^.t tcfut( \1 +
'4*nk'.
{'nrf*r
1o
Twelty-sgven ThouTotal Parking Fee
with interest of ten percent per annum on the unpaid balance,payable in yearJ-y installments as follows:
Future InstaLlments
(Due before receiving building
$6,946.98 due and payable on 7/2L/88 ,
$5,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/89
$6,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/9O
$6,946.98 due & payable on 7/2L/9L
rt is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or decl-areddue hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shalldraw interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum, and thatfailure to make any paylnent of piincipal-or interest to becounted as principal , at the option of the holder of the note.The makers and endorsers hereof several.ly waive presentment forpayment, protest, notice on nonpalment and of protest, and
fgree to any extension of tirne of paynent and partial paynentsbefore, at or after rnaturity, and if this note- or inteie3tthereon is not paid when due, or suit is brought, agree to payall reasonable costs of collection, including reasonableattorneyrs fees.
by:
Date
l-L:
o
75 south tronlage roed
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
SitzrnarkMr. FritchVail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Fritch:
RP/njr
June 22, L987
Sincerely,
Finance Controller
_ I have just been notified by the Conmunity Development
--D--epa-r"tslent.,thet .the.si!.anarF.l-s*f9.i3...parking_.Fei "c-atcu.l,itipn.wasincorrect. rhe "16:r! "r thil p!i.?iiil:i6J;il;id;l;yH:;'!.il;"ainstead of. tle g3g,79o figure.' fn order to arrive at a newinstallment ficrure for th6 remaining two paym-rrt", r took yourinitial-1984 piyment in the "^"""t of g7,75g and deducted thisamount from the totar parking fee, g34,5io to reach the amount tobe figured over a four year ieriod at Lo? interest. Ehis amountis $26,832 which results in ln annual payment of gB t464.7L.Further credit is due_on payment #3 as y-ou have paid. gLr:j:-.e:over on each of your firs! two payments. Theref-ore your 3rd. of 4instalLment pa1'rnLnts sharl be flr' 95,g2r-.os ie,a6i.7r- instarrment#3-minus $z,G+i.66 credit f;; t;;r overpaymenrs on instalrnents 1and 2) . This amount wir] be dire on Novlrnier 5, LgaZ. your fourthand final installment will be for ga,464.7t. -' -'
rf you have -any guestions concerni-ng this matter prease carlme at the Town offices.
Propertys SITZMARK
$ 34,590
REVfSED Total Parking Fee
In installrnents after date,order of the Town of Vail atBuilding at VaiI , colorado,
Building
PROJECT REVTSED LO/84
Permit #
PAYMENT PLAN
Vail. colorado,
for value received,the Office of the
, L987
I prornise to pay to the
Finance Director, Municipal
Th -four Tbousand Five Hundred Nine Dollars,Tota Par Fee
Down Payment (Due before receiving bldg perrnit.)
with interest of ten percent per annum on the unpaid balance, payabre inyearly installments as fo1]ows:
The first installment of S due and payable on
€rr e
-
s eL o nif - init ir rileir€'';f -
6-* : -:; F: d"6:#AT ;-y;B iJ " ii;
the third instalhoent of $
the fourth insthllment of $
821. 05 due and payable on Nov. 5 L987 ,
464.7t due and payable on Nov. 5 l_988,
rt is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared duehereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shall draw interestat the rate of l-8 percent per annum, and that failure to make any paymentof principal or interest when due or any default under any incumlrance oragreement securing this note shall cause the whole note to becone d,ue atorce; or the interest to be counted as principal, at the option of theholder. of the note.- The nakers and endorsers hereof severally waivepresentment for, pa)tnent, protest, notice on nonpayment and of protest, andagree to any extension of time of payrnent and partial payrnents before, at,or after maturity, and if this note or interest thereon is not paid whendue, or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonable costs of collection,including reasonable attorneyrs fees.
by:
Date
-i. "l!:mark Lodge
't .r
,790 n^Vail, Colorado 0ctober 29, 1984
0)-.0 P+eUlrrjo Bpftfnfi',ii^ --eE-
In installments after date, for va.l ue received, I promise to pay to the order
of the Town of Vail at the,office qf the Finance Director, Municipal Building
atvai.t, colorado, ftS'fi- n\CThirtv-gight Thqusand Seven Hrrnrtn^, ,r,^V,Y N \j
with intere)
yearly installmen
The first installment o
thersecond installment of g
the third installment of $ 9786:
----,/------Doll ars ,
, payable in
Ie on November 5, l9g4
ayabl e on__ llovember 5, I 985
nd payable on___:Iovember 5, .|986
the fourth installment of $-zq6.sl_xre and payabre on Noverbe" 5, w
with the remaining balance of $ jlEas2_\ due and payable on
November 5, lggg
IT IS AGREED 1the primcipa'l r,
oL-J.tl.serce
or interest urs-to nake any=papent- \ prin-cipal
,ol,l:.o1. :nl*lllry I I,l J.i ;;y i;;;;;J;'. ";;'";
llt;.':::,:gtl""::::_*re-ilrriii'n;;."i;=;"ilil.'il!"'i["ii:":".ini'.f,:'ilt.;::i"t'nllu!:"':::':;d,::.!::':ii:ti ii-.i;l"5oiY"x=ii"[nl'f;oii"l"3i''fl1 ll;"]"il:"
[3[i:: :lo#ll:ff:li l::":f ::::lltit-viiu.' piil.l#;;;i ;;"T5rfi3Xi: p#t",i,
H*::,on"#'gIT?ll T*l^i;:i.ti,".iii' ;;'.8;=i;"il;";_i:;, f;f;l.;iHf;;l:{l.l: .,:l:,.nitlll-nl,:1,! ueroi6,-ii,-i.-iri.'^ ,iir,'"iirl']iio"ir"iiii,
ffii:"3i" I Ti:::::":m:5::" ii'id iiil d:; ll.:'::',ffil,il'il;"iifl , :'.1[:l:"1:, atl reasonabre costs or cbiiecti'on, rniruai;s ;.;;";;;i:'';ir3:;ff',fees.
that
and
cI
9
/fis note is not paid when due or a.N"o due hereunde
.!9!.1-,n!95es!"=!-h9ie-orr stratt araw I"iJ"lii at the rate
ten percent per annum on the unpaid balan
s fo] I ows:
.,v\,.vv due and p
DATE
\t
Prolect Name:
Proiect Oescription:
Contacl Person and Phone
Project Application
llf r;2.\ lrlrt ,_ifl)
)'l/ r 1J I / ' I I 1 r \-,/---'1-
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Zone
-
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Sum mary:
.l.- a? -I
Project Application
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
{ tz I
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Molion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
\'.*u
Approval
a-
1.,
-. - . 1: .'
i
e
I
i
,1
t
]I
6
rta ,Ir
dPo-<J
I
Ita
Et
I1.. . .i
II
l
I
i{
t,
:
ii
1.
i:It
it
i
t'
Fa
ltJ
=
.tz
6
T
e-
Z
vlrd
I('
ti
.J
i\l
$SJs1,
$v
'i:
'i
I
I
I
I
I
I
Jr -'l
,t. -.-.-. 1
o
3
0
0
1
3
{)'.i'
.l
i
.$
I{
,.t
v
\l
,it' . ;r\'l{ i
!,i t
,S''F
v \t-.
i
v-erf at
'tr-q
.1
o
o
p
'' ?3
ifitt6
vAsiz9i
'tl
t,
lr
'.1
!
t
I- ,t'I
Iv !Fr-I
--l
-oQ
/*--i{.
1
\'.. I
\1. I
\."".{
I
l*
t\
i"r
I i'ttl
,.L
B2
ti?i
rI
Ot
CLQ. b6.
(D
il)
cLC,bb-
imt S
\
I toe I cLc, g9
.Do
NcAl
?rci,r
BrY r^r*oo*C
3lr,Bfrr.|c, re|x
DIME,NgIONAL FLOOR PLAN e,c,
o
VAlr- / aan.t:=n.4iF..E;E,l< KEAU
=,a.5r14rRt(
Esrdrt
L-ob€e
o
,
':1..
.
REDhbob e*id9li\tN 'tt MialtEA '.
RSDl^lacD 2,, 12gllrrt nb |,4AtaH
lxxtgrrN< .'E,tM
MEiTeL cAPlFi-ni{+D.lci
Tb '.{rfa$ Tr<IF{ --\
j
E (r. !\tooDFrHttgi---)
. .i'
".*hlrNtrA^I
JAt4b
Li, t.
PAr.r
ffi"
;
r.dA"d}}trH-t!ilF{ ,Ar.lD
ErtN^lodDl
.i1
Fl)(l€1-til6
MArc+trxK
ex ltrlNc
wgr{@ 2>, lo'
€fAIN F MA'rt3I{
EXI3T1^IG
NooD €oFFtT
=l5l
Ql
Iv-Tr
-?d'7c'1xwg
Bi<TCK -''
'
4..it IJIL-4_-.::
BN:hllNpoj,J 4-. lVzt*lt'ot'
luwn
75 soulh fronlage road
yall, colorado 81652
(303) 476-7000
July 14, 1987
Mr. Bob Fri-tch
Sitznrark Lodge
l-83 core Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Sitzmark Lodge Rernodel
offlce of communlly dovelopment
1.
Dear Bob:
f arn finally at the point where I am able to release thebuilding perruit for the Sitzmark Lodge remodel . f wanted toreiterate the following agreements that we have on the project.
Vacation of the @ f have talked to Mr.eering and reguestedthat he subrnit a survey of the easement on the Sitzmarkproperty as well as the legal description. These twopieces of information will be used as exhibits in thevacation resolution. on July 7, 1997, the Town Councilgave the staff penuission to release a building pennit
even though the easement has not been officially vacated.It will be required that the easement be reviewed as aresolution at a Town council evening rneeting. As soon asI receive the survey information, I will be able toproceed to Town Council and get final approval of thevacation.
At Planning Cornmission, it was agreed that you would becredited in an equitable manner for the improvenents thatyou make to the plaza and sidewalk areas if and when animprovement district is created for the Village. you haveagreed to supply the staff with copies of all the purchaseorders for the project to verify costs for the work.
2.
3. You agreed to pay for the pavers frorn the existing eastedge of the Sitzrnark paver project to the east Sitzmarkproperty line when Blurs does their paver remodel project.Essentially, you would. be filling in a swath of concretethat fills in from the east edge of the pavers to theproperty line. Please see attached drawing for locationof proposed pavers.
4. I wanted to renind you that the signage and canopy on thenorth elevation have not received final OnA approval . Ifeel that more inforrnation is needed. on the appearance ofthe canopy and square footage of the signage that will beused at the north entry.
If you have any guestions about these issues, please feel freeto call ne. Thank you for your continued cooperation on thisproject. I think the plaza and sidewalk areas are reallylooking wonderful .
lfiili ?o,h
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP:br
EncI osure
c
SitzroarkMr. FritchVail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Fritch:
I have just been notified by the Community Development
--P-epa-r.tnenq..thet .the.. S,itanarl<.19*.l9.j3....Parliins-"fee. "calculation rntasincorrect. The amount of the,:piiking:liee itroura :rrtve ueen 934,59oinstead. of the $38,790 figure. tn oider to arrive at a newinstallment figure for the renaining two payments, I took yourinitial 1984 pa)rnent in the anount of $7,?S-S ana deducted thisanount from the totaL parking fee, 934,590 to reach the amount tobe figured over a four year period. at l-o? interest. This anountis $2e,832 which resulti in an annual payment of 98,464.7t.Further credit is due on pa)4aent #3 as you have paid g1_,321_.93over on each of your first two payments. Therefore your 3rd of 4installnent palnuents sharl be f6r- g5,82t-.05 (g,464.2i instarrment#3-urinus i2r643.66 credit for your overpayments on installnents Land 2). This amount will be due on November 5, i,gg7. your fourthand final installment wiLl be for 99,464.7L.' ff you have any questions concerning this matter please call
75 south fronlag€ road
Yail, color.do 81657
(303) 476-7000
me at the Town offices.
June 22, L987
Sincerely,
Finance Controller
RPlnjr
a
BIdg Permit fProperty:SITZIIIARK PROJECT BLDG PERI,TIT SIJUMER 1987
Vail, Colorado,, L987
In installments after date, for value received, I promise to pay to theorder of the Tortn of Vail at the Office of the Finance Director, MunicipalBuilding at VaiI, Colorado,
Twelty-eight Thousand, Two Hundred Forty-five Dollars,Total Parking Fee
Down Paynent $ 5,549.00 (Due before receiving building perrnit. )
annum on the unpaid balance, payable inwith interest of ten percent peryearly j-nstaLlnents as follows:
Future fnstallments:ffior$
the second installnent of g
the third j-nstallnent of S
the fourth installrnent of g
L28 .38
r-28. 38
128. 38 payable
payable
payable
due and
due and
due
due
and
and
payable on
on
on
on128. 38
ft is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared duehereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon sha11 draw interestat the rate of l-8 percent per annum, and that failure to make any palmentof principal or interest when due or any default under any incumbrance or
agreement securing this note sha1l cause the whole note to become due atonce, or the interest to be counted as principal , at the option of theholder of the note. The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive
Presentment for payment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of protest, andagree to any extension of time of payment and partial payrrnents before, at,or after maturity, and if this note or interest thereon is not paid whendue, or suit is brought, agree to pay al-l reasonable costs of collection,including reasonable attorneyrs fees.
by:
Date
Property:SITZMARK
o
$ 34,590 Vail, Colorado,
REVISED Total Parking Fee
In installments after date, for value received,order of the Town of Vail at the Office of theBuilding at VaiI, Colorado,
Building Permit #
PROJECT REVISED LO/84 PAYMENT PLAN
I L987
I prornise to pay to the
Finance Director, Municipal
Thirt -four Thousand Five Hundred Nine
Tota Parking Fee
Down Payment
with interest of ten percent peryearly installments as follows:
The first installment of $
Dollars,
(Due before receiving b1d9 permit. )
annum on the unpaid balance, payable in
due and payable on
due and payable onthe second instalhnent of $
the third installnent of S
the fourth installment of $
due and payable
due and payable
on Nov. 5 1,987 ,
on Nov. 5 L988 ,
821_. 05
464.7L
It is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared duehereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shatl draw interestat the rate of 1,8 percent per annum, and that failure to rnake any paymentof principal or interest when due or any default under any incunrbrance or
agreement securj-ng this note shall cause the whole note to become due atonce, or the interest to be counted as principal , at the option of theholder of the note. The makers and endorsers hereof severally waivepresentment for payment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of protest, and
agree to any extension of tirne of palanent and partial paynents before, at,or after maturity, and if this note or interest thereon is not paid whendue, or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonable costs of collection,including reasonable attorneyrs fees.
by:
Date
f 'tzmark Lodse
Vail, CoJorado 0ctober 29, 1984
DU PSII/JNLNbWIN(NN ffi
In
of
at
for value received, I promise to pay to the order
office of the Finance Director, Municipal Building
o.l
.l ars,
with interest of ten percent per annum on the unpaid balance, payable in
insta] lments after date,
the Town of Vail at the
Vail, Colorado,
yearly installments as follows:
The f i rst i nstal .lment of $ 7759. 00
the-second installment of $ 9786.54
the third instal'lment of $ 9786.54
on November 5, l9g4
on November 5, '1995
on November 5, 19g6
on November 5, l9g7
payable on
due and
due and
due and
payabl e
payabl e
payabl e
payabl e
due and
IT Is AGREED that if this note is not paid when due or dec'lared due hereunder,the primcipal and acffued interqgt.i!gi.ir liiiir draw interest at the rateil lklifi'l;li";lyll,;*g;tlii;,t"j*:i;r;ei= any-paymeiir-or princrpar._ *
the fourth installment of $ j186.5t _ due and
with the remaining balance s1 g 9786.52
November 5, 'l9gg
or interest *h"n-l!:-ol. anv. aiiiur;-;il;; ;;y.'il;ufil;;"1!r""'ii'"ll"Eillli,lll"".,rnthis note sha'l'l cause ttre ivnoie-ioie to lecohe aue-il-6.nce, or the interestto be counted as principal, at the-option oi if,"-r,oiiei of the note. Themakers and endorsers hei^eof iivirarii *iiu" pil;d;;;; iir"ilivrilii, p*i"ri,notice.on nonpavment and of p;;i;;;,-ano atrle-iJ"inv"J*t"nsion of time ofpayment and partiar paymenti before, at, 6r arter miturity, and if this- note or interest thereon is not piia-wrren d;";-;; ,uii-i. brought, agree
l:.1:r arr reasonabre costs or cbiieciiJn,-inirroiii'ieasonaule attorney,s
Fri tch
DATE
,\ "1
1
lown
75 routh ,ronlaE€ roadv. , colorado 8165Z
(303) 476-7000
April 24, L9A7
olflce of communlty developmcnl
!lr. Duane PiperP.O. Box 5560Avon, Colorado 8162O
Re: Buildinq permit review for the Sitznark Lodge
Dear Duane:
The forlowing.iterus will need to be addressed before r can signoff on the building perrnit:
PEC Requirements
1.The owner will subnit a letter from a landscape architectto staff that confirms that the spruce tree cln berelocated- safely to the adjacent open space area alongGore Creek. The proposed location-of tle tree is to f,heeast of the existing_ larnp post by the pedestrian bridge.rf the tree is not ibLe Lo-be reiocate&, the appJ_icani,will-provide a new tree of the "ir" sp""ies, sii--anaquality. A perfornance bond will be recnri rer! in fhp e-rcaquarr.ty. A perforTance bond will be i iria in the casetne tree r
2. Tlre owner wi]_I suhmit l.pla! for roof drainage. Accord.ingto our Town engineer, gitt Rnarews, he is unirre to find -
anything on the buiriling pennit aiiwings-tn"i i"aicateshow roof drainage wilt 6e-handled..
3. At the time of building permit, the owner wirr subrnit awritten legar.agr"enen€, itipuriting ttre i*pio.r"*"nts and.costs which wirr be covered by the owner cirnc"rning-th;-pedestrian pLaza, sidewalk and randscape infiovements andwill provide a letter of credit to covlr it'"-"o"t otimprovenents.
"t
Additional fnfornation
1. A reasonable dirnension for the sidewark nust be agreed.upon between you and the Eire Department.
2- The kitchenette nust be removed. frorn the building perrnitdrawings for the second rever. A wet bar is attowla underthe code, but an actual kitchenette is not perrnitted.
3. Please indicate the roof ridge elevation which willmaintain the 43 foot height iinit.
4- According to the Design Review Board drawings, the windowsfor the second floor office addition had muilions. on the'building perrnit drawings, these mullions are not shown.Please let me know if there is a change.
5. I talked to Rick about the canopy and signage for thenorth entrance into the Sitzrnark. ft appeais that thiswas not thoroughly discussed by the Oesign Review Board.I feel that it would be best i- you would submit a signageappLication and canopy design tor tnis area.
6. On the north elevation there is a new roof support. Thiswas not on the Design Review Board drawings. -Is this anecessary support for your roof structure? I suppose ifthe roof will fal.r down without it, we better inliucle itlIt was also my understanding that the existing supportsunder the decks on the east portion of the building willbe removed.
Pl-ease subrnit this additional inforrnation as soon asso we can release the building perrnit for the rest ofproject.
possible
the
r have also encrosed information on the parking, recreation,and Design Review Board fees. The parki-ng tee-ior cornmerciarspaces is $fs,2Oo and for residentilf spa-es, 915,045. Thiscreates.a total parking fee of s28,24s. The'recreation fee forEne pro]ect is 93,i.09. The Design Review Board fee is based onthe.project valuation. Does the g4.zstoo} valuation for theproject arso includes the improvements to the sidewalk area? rneed to know the total projelt valuation before r can give-you-the actual Design Review B6ard fee.
Please let rne know if you have anydiverse comnents. thanks for yourproj ect.
Sincerelv,v.I fl-+-
N\\Tl4\ Nr \'1-Kridtan Pritz
Town Planner
guestions about thesecontinued help on this
PARKING CALCUI,ATIONS FOR A€€I€ta{9'i{*f€rr UNITS
EXIST.PROPOSEDSO FT
EXTST.PARK
GRANDFATHERED
.738
.745
.705
.705
.705
.705
RETAIL
OFFICE
RESIDENTIAL
SQ FT
PROPOSED
PARKING = DIFF
AQ. roa0,Q' tos
A,U, 2L2
A,U. ztsi,tL' sn
A Q,IU
338
346
30s
305
305
305
(rec. fee
$1. oo
Proj. Valuation
.815
O .-atf
.782
,820
.782
.820
Total
77
L15
77
115
77
115
.o770#
.077
.115
.o77
.115
.5E
, V3l
RECREATION FEE
usE sQ FT
L,o92
207
1,809
3r108
new sg.for CCI) x (total
x 3, 1-09
TOTAL RECREATION FEE
ft)
$ 3,108
S 3,108
DESIGN REVTEW BOARD FEE
.,
USE
East Retail
West Retail
Corner Retail
Offl-ce
#xo4
€' *2t2
*2L4
#3t2
#314
New Accomnodation
#2LG
#2 rg
#3 L6
PARKING
77 s.f. )1r.s s.f.)
units
398. 6.f.
437 s.f.
398 s.f.
Total Residential Spaces
SPACES
3.5
-8
4.4 spaces
-E4r
, t6l
,798
.837
.798
-*e,w
(comm. park. fee)
- (res. park fee)
STTZMARK BUILDTNG PERMTT CHECK 4/24/87
PARKTNG
SQ. FT
54o s.f.)
297 s.f.) Total 1092255 s.f.)
2O7 s.f.
Total Commercial Spaces
Acs'ornmodation Unit Additions
!o"T:""i?l-space = $3,000/spaceResidentlat = $5,ooolipacl -
(Total ?"Tr: spaces) x (comn. space cost) ={.d spaces x g3r0OO = gt3,roo
(Total resid. Sppces) x (res. space cost)
=9t_
spaces x $51000 = $r3F{5
a, t?!t.h qlo
RESIDENIIAL EXPANSTONS,
FEE
AND a| 6?0= ..,ffi+F
Unif t\&l;w,
# /or
77 s.f.l
77 s.f. )lls s.f.)
TOf
tl f, s,{.
lnwn
75 south fronlage road
vall' ca1s66e 61557
(303) 476-7000
0ctober 29, 1984
offlcc of communlty dcvolopmcnl
Bob Fritch
Sitzmark Lodge.|83 East Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Sitzmark Parking Fees
Dear Bob,
I have-gone over the parking situation for the Sitzmark and propose thefol 1 ow'i ng:
Commercial Addition
3611 square feet
7 surface
Cred i ts
(new space) -
spaces
300 = 12.03 spaces+ 7.00
T0;d3
4 spaces (re-opened in basement) - 4.003 lodge rooms - Z.l0
Total spaces '12.93
12.93 spaces @ $3,000 = 938,790
These numbers should-be fairly self-explanatory. There was a slight increasein the total square footage of the addition when I measured the eitire area -
o_fthe'lodge rooms that are converted to commercial . credit has been givenfor the removal of the three rooms, ds well as for the four spaces yoi wil'lre-open in the basement.
I feel these.figures represent a reasonable compromise. You wi'l I find a promissary
note. enclosed for your. signature. It is based on an initiat payment of l7sot the amount due, with the remainjng amount financed over the next four years.
A1y gueg!!gns concerning payment schidures can be directed to Rich parion-t<o- --
at 476-7000.
Bob Fritch
Sitzmark Lodge
10129184
Page Two
Please feel free to call me wlth anv,9u::!i9lt-:ol Llv have. .Issuming you
i[: runli;"*,*;t"j;:'ff',i,loili:'ff";:a;:: fft"e the tniiiai id;int
Sincerely,/nL \ bf.\-
Thomas A. Braun
Town Planner
TAB: bpr
I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&'ECT:
I.
II.
i-JT
ffi'{v'\
Town Council
Conmunity Development Department
August 18, L987
Vacation of a utility easementthe Sitzrnark property on the northwest side of
REQUEST
The Sitznark Lodqe is reguesting to vacate a L0 footutility easement located on the northwest corner oftheir property. A portion of the new buil-ding isproposed to be located on this easement.
BACKGROT'ND ON THE REQUEST
The original l-0 foot utility easement was created byVail Associates during the original plat process forVail Vil-Iage First Fiting. In L9'74, it was determinedthat a portion of the Sitznark building encroached intothe 10 foot utility easement. A partial vacation and
abandonment of the existing 10 foot utility easement
and a grant of a new easement was cornpleted in June ofL974. This agreement vacated the easement below theexisting Sitzrnark building and relocated the easementto the northwest of the Sitzmark on Town of Vailproperty.
In the spring of 1987, the Sitzmark project was
reviewed by the Design Review Board. One of therequired subrnittal documents was a title report. staffallowed the project to begin dernolition before thetitle report had been subrnitted. Once the title report
was submitted, it, was detennined that the easement
would have to be vacated in order for the constructionto proceed. At that time, the staff had theunderstanding that the easement only involved utitity
companies and did not involve ttre Town of Vail . Theapplicant subrnitted letters fron the utility companiesverifying that they had no problem with vacation of theeasenent and that they would allow the Sitzmark toproceed with their construction. Upon furtherinvestigation of the title report, it became evidentthat the Town Council would also have to sign off onthe easement vacation. This understanding was reachedthe week of June 29th.
On ituly 7, L987, the Town Council gave the Sitznark theright to proceed with construction. The understandingsas that as soon as the appropriate legal_ work had beenconpJ-eted, the staff and Sitzrnark owner wouldpresent the vacation to the Town Council for theirfinaL approval . Attached to this rnemo Ls the vacatLonand abandonment agreement as well as the documentationof the approval of all utillty coupanies. The staff,reconmends approval of the request.
THIS INSTRUMENT is made this daY of , 1987, by and
between THE SITZMARK LoDGE ol.lNER, MR. B0B FRITCH, (hereinafter referred to as
"Owner"), and the TOI!,N 0F VAIL, C0L0RAD0, a municipal corporation.
WHEREAS, a certain easement of record to be abandoned described as a
uti'l jty easement ten (10) feet in width along the northwestlot line of a parcel
described in book 235 at page 338 of the Eag'l e County, Colorado, Clerk and
Recorder's records, said parcel being known as the "sitzmark Lodge parcel" and
being a part of LOT A, BLOCK 5-8, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING ACCORDING TO A llAP
THEREOF RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO, CLERK AND RECORDER
(see attached Exhibit A) (hereinafter "the Utility Easement"); and
!.IHEREAS, the easement is not presently used for the construction, maintenance
and reconstruction of utilities; and
[THEREAS, no future use of the easement for the construction, maintenance and
reconstruction of utilities is contemplated; and
WHEREAS, a portion of Owner's proposed building to be located on property is
in conflict with the original platted easement; and
WHEREAS, neither the 0wner nor the General Pub'l jc realized any beneficjal use
in allowing such easement to remain; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail on behalf of the General Public has evidenced its
intent to abandon all claim and interest in the easement.
NOI.J, THEREF0RE, in consjderatjon of the mutua'l promises contained herein and
the mutual benefits to Ue aelved and other good and valuab'le consideration, the
parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as fo] 'lows:
l) The Town of VaiI on behalf of the General Public, by this instrument
hereby forever abandons, vacates, releases and terminates that portion of the
Utility Easement as now described as an easement ten (10) feet in width along the
nonthwest lot'line of LOT A, BLOCK 5-8, VAIL VILLAGE, FILING N0. 1, ACCORDING T0
THE RECoRDED t'lAP THEREoF, CoUNTY 0F EAGLE, STATE 0F C0L0RAD0. Easement Users
hereby convey all their right, tit'l e, and interest jn and to that portion of the
Utility Easement vacated above, to Owner. l
2) This Vacation and Grant shall be b'inding upon and jnure to the benefit of
the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
TOI.IN OF VAIL
8y:
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) SS.
The foregolng Vacation and Abandonment of Easement was acknorledged
before me thjs
-day
of
Exi sti ng
, 198_ by
Vail.as
-of
the Town of
l{ltness my hand and officlal seal . My cormission expires:
0vrner hereby accepts the foregoJng Vacation of Easement'
Exhibit A
elge\to
TRACT I
2
(o2
f.,"tj
,ti o^P.",\o
Sg'52,'E-,ut^;p
'-u\
N ggo I l'oo"w 555d
A PART OF
LOT o. BLOCK 5-8
t26.64'PO[{T OF
BEGINNING \
6a"69
-.r;99's?'
(ni,
coRNER
LOT o, ELOCK 5-8
oo
oo
do
ltl
|oo't
oo
o
@
zto
-:-t1'oo"vl
6.rd
(40')scALE l"= 30'
A tca foot ltrlp of lrod bclng part of that parcel descrlbcd lo Eook 235 rt
Page 338 of the Elglc couocy, colorado, clerl, aad Recorder?l recordl, aeldparcel belog Loorm ae thc *Sltzoert. lodge parcel" aod belng e pert of lat e,Blocl' 5-B' va1l vttlagc 8lrst llllng eccordlng to tbe oap thgrcof rccorded
1o the offlce of the tagle County, Colorado, Clerl, end Rlcorder, aaid teafoot rtrlp belng dcacrlbqd ae follwa:
Begtnnlng rt the aorthwesterly corner of.aeld rrsltzoark Lodge parceltt wheucethe northseat corner of sald l,ot r bears s66t18r00r\f 65.45 feet3 thence thefollortog two courses along the northerly 1lne of eald l,ot a and eaid I'sltz-
nark Lodge parcelr: (l) N66c18'00"8 46.00 feet; (2) sg5.l5r52',E 21.00 feet;
thenee departlog ea{d norther!.y llne, 566'18r00r$ 65.64 feet Go the veeterlyllne of saLd ilSltzuarL Lodge parcel,'; thence Nl?oOOrOO.ll 10.0? feet alonggald.resterly llne to the potnt of beglanlng, cootalnlng 558 sguare feet,
nore or legs.
s41E; -t'Zo-ei?
coLoRADO L.S. 15827' '-]t-' '''" '
EAGLE VALLEY ENGINEERING A SURVEYING, INC.,953 S, FRONTAGE ROAD WEST. VAIL COLORADO,8I657
R = 65.0O'
A= l6o03'lz"
L= 18.21'GORE CREEK DRIVE
835
a
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING EASEMENT
AssocrATrON, a colorado nonprofit corporation and vArL WATER AND
THIS INSTRITMENT is made this "2 6 /,t d,ay of 6oNE 1987.by and between THE SITZMARK AT VAII-INC. , a C6Toffil6-corporatiol, ("Owner") and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,(for itself and as assignee of, or Euccessor in interest to, cAsFACILITIES, INC., a Colorado corporarion) and HOLy CROSS ELECTRICADDUtrr.tlr\rrrr a uororaqo nonprorlE corporation and VAIL WATER ANsANrrATroN DrsrRrcr and MouMArN srATEs TELEPHONE AND TELEcRAptt
COMPANY, dlbla MOIJNTAIN BELL, a Colorado corporarion(collectivelyr ttEasement Users").
WHEREAS, a certain ten (10) foot utility easement over thenortherly-ten feet of Tract a (and adjacent io the northerlyproperty line of Tract- a), Vail Village First Filing, Vail,'Colorado, rdas creargg-ly VAIL AsSocIAiEs, INc. in tE6 originalVail-Village First Filing Plar, filed under Reception Nr.rm6er96382 at Pages 49 and 50-in the pl_at Book of Eagie Counry,colorado, arrowing Easement user the use of suc6 easemenl-for theconstrucEion, maintenance and reconstruction of sewerage, Irater,gas, electric .and telephone transmission facilities; aia,
WHEBEAS ' th9 location of a portion of such utiliEy easeuentwas modified by document recordei August 12, 1974 in B6ok 236 atP-age 22 of the rear property records-of Eagie county, colorado.such.utility easemenE as relocated is herelnafter rlferred to asthe "Utility Easernent"; and,
_ IIHEREAS, PuBLrc sERvrcE cOMpANy oF coLoRADO is rhe assigneeof, or successor in interest to, GAS FACILITIES, INC., which'obtained the right to use the uiirity Easement 6v an instrrrnentrecorded July 24, L964, in Book r83,-at page 157'in the recordaof Eagle County, Colorado; and,
- WIIEREAS, the Utility Easeuent is not presently being usedand the Easement user hai no present intenlion of irsing fuchEasement; and
. WHFREAS, .a porrion of Owner's building, the Sit,zmark Lodge,is now located on a portion of the Utility-Easement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promisescontained herein and the mutual benefits Eo be derivld and othergood and_valuable consideration, the receipt of which isacknowledged, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree asfollows:
1. Easement User, on behalf of itself, its successors andassigns, by this i.nstrument hereby forever abandons, vacates,releases, and terminates its right to the Utilicy Easement.
Easement User hereby conveys all its right, titla and interest in
and to Utility Easement vacated above, Eo Owner.
2. This Vacation and Abandonment shall be bindins upon andinure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of tf,e lartieshereto.
{PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY 0F COLOMDO,as Successor Eo, and/or Assigneeof, GAS FACILITIES, INC., a
Colorado
ur,
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, trppnOWOColorado nonprof ic corporation rffFt|ririfn
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
w{Nwtl
BY:
VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
BY:
-.I,MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE A}ID
TELEGRAPH COI4PANY , dlbla MOUNTAIN
BELL, a Colorado corporation
BY:
o.
l. Eascn:enc User, on behalf or itself, its successors andassigns , by thir; ins rru.lcr'IE hereby ror"vei-ab..JJr.," , vacaces ,releases, .,rnd r:e11,i1a!es ics righc ro rhe Uciliry EasemenE.Easemenr uuer rrercby con\.r.:ys ari ic"-rii[.]-;i;iA and inreresE inand co Ucilit;' lj;.;erncnt vacaEed airove, Eo Owner.
2. This V:rcation and Abandonment shall be binding upon and
i:|::":" rtre benefic r:f rtre ".,"".""or" o"a-i""ig,rI o, rhe parries
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,as Successor to, and/or essienle -
ot , GAS I'ACILITIES, INC. ,Colorado
BY:
ATTEST:
HOLY CROSS ELECTRICColorado nonprofit ASSOCIATION, AcorPoration
ATTEST:
.ft t:(-,._
ATTEST:
VAIL I^JATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
BY:
MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPIIONE ANDTELEGMPH COMPANY, dlb/ a r"rbUllrafr.rBULL, a Colorado corporation
ATTEST:
l)',trntn,
BY:
' 1. Easement User, on behalf of itself, its successors andasslgns, by this instrument hereby forever abandons, vacates,releases, and terminates its righE to the Utility Easement.
Easement usr:r hereby conveys all its right, titla and interest inand to UciliEy Easement vacated above, Lo Owner.
2. This Vacation and Abandonment shall be bindinginure to che benefit of the successors and assigns of tiiehereto.
upon andparties
ATTEST:
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPAI{Y OF COLOMDO,as Successor to, and/or Assigneeof, GAS FACILITIES, INC., a
Colorado
BY:
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC
Colorado nonorofit:
ASSOCTATION, a
corporation
ATTEST:
BY:
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLTDATED
SANITATION DISTRICT
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
BY: ef -E
MOUIITAIN STATES TELEP}{ONE AND
TELEGMPH COMPANY, d/h/a MOUNTAIN
BFILL, a Colorado corporationft
""r
?
.1 .
It
o
STATE OF COLORADO )) ss.
CoUNTY 0F oenvEn )
The foregoing vacatLon and Abandonment of Exlstine EaeemenEwas acknowledged before me this 2qrh day of June I UeZ, Uyas
-s1
.-o p.-,'o offiE[f3-c Servicessor to. and/or Assisnee of. G
couNTY 0F EAGLE )
The foregoing vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easementwas acknowledged before me this _ day of _l feeZ, Uyas_ offiiTl;GTs Eleciril
ASSOC].aC].On, a Uoloraclo nonprofit corporation.
Witness uy hand and official seal .
My conmission expires:
Notary PubIic
STATE OF COLOMDO )) ss.
COT'NTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoin-g Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easementwas acknowledged before me this _ day of _l tSaZ, UyaB _ of VaiI Water andSanitation District.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My coumission expires:
a.
l'
)) ss.
)
The foregoing Vacation andgknowlgdged before me rhis!ras-<3KnosrIedge
f'n cnhn..rJ ( 1.i".
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
ATTEST:
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
Abandonnent of Existing Easeientjl';,i d.y of -irllr.,r I ISOZ, ty.,;.s.,.r.. of Modntain Statesdl'b/a Mountain BeIl, a Colorado
asTeI ephone and TefEgE?ffiT6E[any,corporation.
Vlitness my hand and official
My coumission expires: . it-,\i ) -
sea1.
)) ss.
)
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment-veg.ackegwlgdged before me thi,s_...*.^ dav of-,3irF-"
ot,ary :ryr t/
THE SITZI'IARK AT VAIL, INC., AColorado corporation
Existing Easement, 1987. bvSffiark at-
Witness my hand and official seal.
My couuniss ion expires . .1\.',1 tl - -.2.j'-
of
\\\...
srATE OF COLORADO I ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foreg,oing Vacation.arrd Aband::*:?t of Existi"? tAA;T"l;I tgaz, uy
"i::**f/or Assignee or' GAs
;iEiiiid;,";Nd';-a' colorado corPoraEion'
Witness rny hand and official seal'
!1y cornnission exPires :
STATE OF COLORADO )
' (*,;i 10. ss '
COUNTY OF EffiE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment
zi{fM;
Witness ury hand and official seal'
My coorrission exPit""' y''/ 7/
Easement
1987, bY
Electric
of Existing EasemenE, t9gl ' uy
VaTTTEEET and
STATE OF COLORADO )) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The fbregoing Vacation and
was acknowledged before t" tn:""
ocary
Abandonmenc
-
daY of
Witness mY hand and official seal'
l,ly corurission exPires :
xisting
!
STATE OF COLORADO )
corrNTy oF EA.LE I t"'
The foregoing vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easementwas acknowredged before me rhis _ day of _; 19g7; -i-ti:";T#,;mll;;^; '
FACILITIES, INC., a Colorado "oip"i.iir"l'v-
'rse46
Witness my hand and official seal.
My corunlssion expires :
STATE OF COLoRADO )
corrNTy oF EA.LE I t"'
The foreeoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existingwas acknowled[ed 5.foi.-r.--t[Ii day of Easement
1987, byElectricas. oIEfffiTsAs s oc :.ar j-on, a Co 1 oidclo noiLf'rof iFESffit ion .
Witness my hand and official seal.
My couunission expires :
STATE OF COLORADO
COI'NTY OF EAGLE
.'CoNSOLIDATED SANIrarroN qrstnrct
Witness my hand and official seal.
My comnission expLres: ! /.< :, io.<\2,
/'- t <-- (
\
u. _/'--. - \. _..' v
..... ... -__. : .:.
...
3
)) ss.
)
The foregoing vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easementwas acknowt edeed before ue Ehis /+ .41t-;i- J-A;.; I rgail-L-i
=;?,!
'-^l-
7 " Pn n ot uPPER EAGLE vALLEY
a.
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
APPROVEIJ AND ACCEPTED:
ATTEST:
STATE O}' COLORADO
COU}ITY OF LAGLI:
.r-rY u
THE SITZ}IARK AT VAIL, INC., AColorado corporation
By: .ali,+/: (,'#c
E>risting Easeuent,
-:--r 1987, bY
s]-Ezmark at
ss.
The foregoing Vacation ancr Abandonnen' of ExisEing Easementwas-sck'owledeed before me chis _.Si: d"y of 1r,,.f _; lggi; -ttff,h#;: TFI::'eiiil:corporati.on.
Witness my hand and official seal.
l"ly comnrission expires: rI rl rr. I ,_ ,/. ._--
)) ss.
)
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment.wag ac.knowlsdg,ed before me this ,..-..,,.. d.ry of
1'r.'\r .\ i tr \,,..:----=-+ aS t't...L_!_ Ovart, rtlc., a Uolorado corpor;tLion.
I'Jitness my hand and otticial seal .
I'ly commission expire.s : . :\ .1ir
. \_- t-ij.-.
-
rioEary Pub l__-ic) ::) cA\i\t-
of
\\ \..
(]ll
C
!
tgr
o
t
o
:
'4
o
ro
9c
lr,
N|r)-a
oirol
cDl
U'I
fa;
zr\
tq
ut
7
"2r
t2
!?
'9
olo
@l
vtl
li)ro(v
!oo
@a
@cro_ ra)
Po:oYc6a-(tgE
Cqt
F
rt
olrj
F-()
EF
0-:l.-ft .i..| ;-;
- -_L'./
I
5ffi
?.ov
$
(foo''rt
TO:
FROM:
rownQrrn"ir
Cournunity Developruent Departrnent
DATE: July 7, L987
SUBJECT: vacation of a utility easement on the northwest sideof the Sitzmark property
I. REQUEST
The Sitzmark Lodge is reguesting to vacate a 10 footutility easement located on the northwest corner of theirproperty. A portion of the new building is proposed to belocated on this easement.
Ir. BACKGROUND OX__THE__REOUES!
t"" *t"t"* 1O foot utility easement was created by VailAssociates during the original plat process for VailVillage First Filing. In L9'14,- it wis determined. that aportion of the Sitznark buitding encroached into the 10foot utility easement. a partiir vacation and abandonmentof the existing 10 foot utility easernent and a grant of anew easment was completed in June of L974. This agreementvacated the easement below the existing sitzrnark buirdingand relocated the easernent to the northwest of theeasement on Town of Vail property. please see theattached agreernent concerning this easement.
-In the spring of 1987, the Sitzrnark project was reviewed
!V tne Design Review Board. one of the-required submittaldocuments $ras a title report. Staff allowed the projectto begin deroolition before the title report had been-subrnitted. Once the title report was subrnitted, it wasdetermined that the easernent would have to be vacated inorder for the construction to proceed. At that time, thestaff had the understanding th-t the easement onlyinvolved utility companies and did not involve the Town ofVail . The applicant subrnitted letters from the utilityconpanies verifying that they had no problem with vacalionof the easement and that they would arlow the sitznark toproceed with their construction. Upon furtherinvestigation of the title report, it became evident thatthe Town Council would also have to sign off on theeasement vacation. This understanding was reached theweek of June 29th. The staff worked with the appricant toprepare the vacation easement for the work se=s-i-on so thatthe building perrnit would not be held up any longer thanabsolutely necessary.
Attached to this memo you will find a vacation and' abandonment agreement as well as appropriate signatures.On Tuesday, the applicant wiII submit the legal
description and stamped survey of the actual easenentbeing vacated on Sitinark prolerty. The only additionatsignature that is needed on tle vication and'abandonmentagreement is that of the public Service Company. However,we do have an original 1etter from cary Hall, FublicService Conpany representative, dated -Vlay 28', 1987 whichstates that the public Service Company ilis in the procesof executing an abaternent of this easement and the| haveno problen with the Sitznark building on it.tr The TownEngineer has reviewed this reguest aid has no problen withthe vacation.
once these two final pieces of information are submitted,the staff will present the resolution vacating theeasement at an evening meeting. In addition, if the TownCouncil does not have-a probl6m with the vacition, thestaff would like to proceed to issue the building pernitinrnediately after thE work session review.
397501
tur,. 4.?/
Pa3r.--o{ {@--
.-. ,iiHtitTIE PilLLlFS! t,r,cL[ cTY. REC0tiDtn
Our 5 2sePll'01
the
TO
the
i.'o'
q-
THIS INSTRUMENT is made this 18th day of Ausust , 1987, by and betneen
THE SITZMARK I0DGE OI{NER, MR. R0BERT F. FRITCH, (hereinafter referred to as
"0wner"), and the TOUN 0F VAIL, C0L0RAD0, a municipal corporation.
IIHEREAS, a certain easement of record to be abandoned described as a utility
easement ten (10) feet in width along the northwest lot line of a parcel described
in book 235 at page 338 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's
records, said parcel being known as the "Sitzmark Lodge parcel" and being a part of
LOT A, BLOCK 5-8, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING ACCORDING TO A MAP THEREOF RECORDED II'I
THE OFFICE 0F THE EAGLE C0UNTY, C0L0RAD0 CLERK AND RECORDER (see attached Exhibit
A) (hereinafter "the Utility Easement"); and
WHEREAS, the easement is not presently used for the construction, maintenance
and reconstruction of utilities; and
WHEREAS, no future use of the easement for the construction, maintenance and
reconstruction of utilities is contemplated; and
IIHEREAS, a portion of Owner's proposed building to be located on property is
confljct with the original platted easement; and
WHEREAS, neither the Owner nor the General Public realized any beneficial use
allowing such easement to remain; and
IJHEREAS, the Town of Vail on beha]f of the General Public has evidenced its
intent to abandon all claim and interest in the easement.
NOl,/, THEREF0RE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and
the mutual benefits to be derived and other good and valuable consideration, the
parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1) The Town of Vail on behalf of the General Public, by this instrument
1n
in
hereby forever abandons, vacates, releases and terminates that portion of the
Utility Easement as now described as an easement ten (10) feet in width along
northwest lot line of LOT A, BLOCK 5-B, VAIL VILLAGE, FILING NO. 1, ACCORDING
THE RECORDED MAP THERE0F, C0UNTY 0F EAGLE, STATE 0F C0L0RAD0. Easement Users
hereby convey all their right, title, and interest in and to that portion of
Uti'l 'ity Easement vacated above, to 0wner.
2) This Vacation and Grant shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
'^oJ
STATE OF COLORAOO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
)) ss.
)
The foregolng Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easement was ackncl.adged
of the Town of Vail.
and official sea'I. My commission expires:llyaffitdrtusn,l$
the foregoing Vacation of Easement.
Robert F. Fritch
a9
TRACT T
Exhibit A
;,{
e'es$e${
W_lg's2"E
A PART OF
LoT o. ELOCr 5-B
f 26.6C,Polr{T oF
BEGII{NING s#$66;
'*'*>'(ni
coRNER
LOT o. BLOCK 5-B
1. ?,'(l'? O\'O O.2g)
oaa
o
@(n
l|J
n
_oItoo
o
an
z
7o
NBg"lt'oo"w ssso
R = 65.OO'
A= | 6o03'tz"
L= 18.21'
4-,759"vt
GORE CREEK.
DRIVE
(40')scALE l"= 30'
A tao foot ltrlp of leod bclng, part of thac parcel degcrlbcd la Boot 235 et
Page 338 of the Eeglc Countt, Colorado, Clert aod Recorderfe recorde, geid
garcel belog tnon ar thc *sltzoarl ladge parcel'r aod bclog r pert of lot r,ElocL 5-B, Yall vlllegc 8lret P1llng eccordlng to the uap thgrcof recorded10 the offlce of thc tagte Couoty, Colorado, Clerl, ead Rlcorder, aald tcafoot ctrlp belng deacrlbed as follove:
. !.i -.
Eeginolng rt the lorthweeterly corner of.sald 'rsltznark Lodge pareelrr rbenecthe oorthscat corner of eald Lot e beare s66'lEr00'\{ 65.45 feet; thence thcfollortng Bwo courses elong the oortherly llne of eald lpt a and sald trsltz-
oark Lodge parcel'r! (l) N66.18r00riE 46.00 feet; (2) sg5.15t5Z'rE 21.00 feet;
thence departlng eald northerry llne, s66'18r00'lJ 65.64 feer to tbe resterlyllne of said r'Sltznart, Lodge parcelt,; thence Nl7cO0rOO"lf 10.0? feet a!.otrggald.weeterly llne to the potot of beglnnlng, cootalolng 558 square feet,
nore or leeg.
p41g; 't'Za-ei?
DANNTE CORCORAN .r'll,lt'l "
coloRAoo L.s. 16627.'. ,,'', ','',,'
,
suRvEYrNG, tNC.! 953 S. FRONTAGE ROAo WEST, VA|L COLORADO,81657 835
,-'I f r t z
VALLEY ENGINEERING-A
a
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING EASEMENT
THIS INSTRIJMENT ls made t};.i,s 2 6 rr day of tct n E , 1987,by and beEween..THE SITZMARK AT VAII-NC.', a C6To=t<I6--' --
corporatiol, ("Owner"1 -and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,(for itself and as assignee of, or successor in interest to, GASFACILITIES, INC., a Colorado corporaEion) and HOLy CROSS ELiCTRICAssOcrATrON, a col.orado nonprofit corporation and vArL WATER Al{DSANITATION DISTRICT ANd MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPHCOMPANY, dlbla MOtNTAIN BELL, I Colorado corporarion(collectively, ttEasement Users").
I,IIERIAS, a certain ten (10) foot utility easeuent over thenortherly- ten feet of Tract a (and adjacent to the northerlyproperty line of Tract- a), Vail Villale First Filing, Vail,'colorado, was creargg_ly vArL Ass_ocrAiEs, rNc. in tf,i oiitinarvail_Village First Filing Plat, fired under Reception Num6er96382 at Pages 49 and 50 in the plar Book of Eagie Counry,cororado, allowing Easement user the use of suc6 easement'for theconstruction, maintenance and reconstruction of sewerage, water,gas, electric and telephone transmission facilities; aiai
uHqBqAq, thg locarion of a porrion of such utility easenentwas modified- by documenr recorded Augusr 12, 1974 in B'ook 236 atPage zz of the real property records-of Eagle county, cororado.such.utility easement a6 reiocared is hereinafrer rlferred to asthe "UEility Easenent,'; and,
. I{IIEREAS, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY oF coLoRADO is the assigneeof, or successor in interest to, GAS FACIIiTIES, inC., which*obrained the right to use the u;ititv gasement-6v-an inscrwrentrecorded Jury 24, 1964, in Book 183,-at page 157'in the recorda*,'$;u:,,'l;"',I;:;1::1,"".
is nor presenrry uer,,g,,""aand the Easement user hai no present intention of irsing SuchEaseuent; and
,_ _-S|rytlt," porrion of Owner,s building, the Sitznark Lodge,1s non rocated on a portion of the utility-Easement; and,
NOW,- THEREFORE,- in consideration of the mutual promisescontained herein and Ehe uutual benefirs to be aeiivla and othergo_od and -valuable considerarion, the receipt-or-wtich isacknowledged, the parties hereto hereby .oir""a"t "tra .ti.e asfolLows:
C OC
1. Easement User, on behalf of itself, its successors andassigns, by this irlstrument hereby forever abandons, vacates,releases, and terminates its right to the UEility Easement.
Easement User hereby conveys all its right, titl;t and interest inand to Utility Easement vacaEed above, Eo Owner.
2. This Vacation and Abandonment shall be bindins uDon andinure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of t6e iartieshereto.
: 1.... _...!"""':"'...,.
-.":.;'tllll..
,., ;.:.,,r"...r'.,";i.'....'. r, -'],i"t ..'..'j .'r : i. , .. ;.,'1. '... :;lir;- i', i, : i. r : ;'.'.n'.,
,'::j ..; 'c+T.tE$T
'r, r'; l';.1..! -:r-:r..i--...r i :,
t,':,i^-; .,;&4,+!,." !.,' t, .'t' ,'. er.c).aiiscrctr:v
<PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,as Successor Eo, and/or Assigneeof, GAS FACILITIES, INC., 8 -
Colorado
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, trppROttOColorado nonprof ic corporarior rdilE[Er]fiffn
By: aYl@t'ATTEST:
ATTEST:
VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
BY:
-* MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND
TELEGRAPH COI'IPANY , dlb l a MOT NTAINBELL, a Colorado corporation
ATTEST:
;.
l' Easc*cnE user, .n behalf or itself-, i.s "rr"""""ors andassigns, b;r rhir; insrruurcr.rc neieul, for;;;;-;6"ijJ,.", vacares,rereases , and ."IT^i:.::: ics righ'c ro rhe Uriliry EasemenE.Easemenr user hercby con..,cys ori ic"-ri;;.;';i;ii ..,0 inreresE inand to UciliLl' lii.;cmunC tr,:rcated above, Eo Owner.
2. This Vircation anclinurc Eo Ehe benefic nf ai;;here Eo .
Abandonmenr shall be binding upon andsuccessors and assigns of tf,e iaities
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,as Successor to, and/or A";i;;;;of, cAs L-AcrlrriEa;-iNa.;-;--"==
Colorado
BY:
HOLY CROSS ELECTRICColorado nonprofit
ATTEST:
ASSOCIATION, AcorporaEion
ATTEST I
,,/t t:!i
ATTEST:
VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
nv.
yg_uryTArN STATES TELEPTToNE ANDTELEGRApH col.,tpANy, alul. lrbiiilrernBELL, a Colorado corporation
ATTEST:
i
'it_l
1
:r{
\
l(ac
' 1. Easement User, on behalf of itself, its successors andassigns, by this instrument hereby forever abandons, vacates,releases, and Eerminates its right co the utirity EasemenE.Easement ust:r hereby conveys all iEs right, titla and interest inand co Ucilicy Easement vacated above, io Owner.
2, This Vacatioq and Abandonment shall be binding upon and,inure ro the benefit of the successors and assigns or if;.-i"iti."hereto.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPAI.IY OF COLORADO,as Successor to, and/or Assigneeof, GAS FACILITIES, INC., a -
Colorado
BY:
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC
Colorado nonprofit:
BY:
ASSOCIATION, Acorporation
ATTEST:
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED
SANITATION DISTRICT
MOU}ITAIN STATES TELEPIIONE ANDTELEGMPH COI,iPANY, C,/t>/ a MOUI.ITAIN
BFILL, a Colorado corporation
ATTEST:
t-er-E
5-2.8 -a/
lcu4e4*-,
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF DENVER
)
)
)
ss.
l6Eh day of June . 1987. bvil-. o'^" offiETffiivil; ' -'
r to, and/or Assignee of, GAS
of Exlsting Easement
550 1sth St. Rm. S40
Denver, Colo. 80202
Easement
1987, byElectric
and seal . :
expires:
tary
RADO
ss.
EAGLE
Witness uy hand and official seal .
My corttnission expires:
L2/tz
(_-
l9o n-{t
)
)
)
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment of ExistingIdas acknowledged before me this _ day of -
of iffii@.rr". ,- -
STATE OF COLoRADO )
corrNTY oF EA.LE i ""'
The foregoing Vacation andwas acknowledged before oe thi_s
Abandonment of Existing Easementday of
a8
. 1987. bvoffii and
I.litness ny hand and official seal .
My couuission expires:
o(
STATE OF COLoRADo )) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation andwas-<:knowlgdged before me rhis|f\ cnhn^...rd ( l-ir. ,, asTelephone h@ny,
corporat.ion.
lc
Abandonnent of Existing Easement,d d"y of -[r1l..r ] tsgil-f-y.,rri.!!i.r . oE-MoEnEG-staEes' -'
dl'bla l,lountain BeII, a Colorado
THE.SITZI'IARK AT VAIL, INC., AColorado corporacion
?..
Witness ny hand and official seal.
My commission expires: . it-,\i,
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
ATTEST:
STATE OF COLOMDO IJ ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment,r,lag .ackqowledged before me thi.s_r\-i J;t-;i'-,ii'FL"
of Existing Easement
_, 1997, bySitzEark at
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: .ll.,l it _ ,r-:.':
\\\.'.
Th
Not"itTuQt$rcS
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
)) ss.
)
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonmenu of Existins Easement
,o" " "liiio,i" JE"a E.;;;:';:".f,i: :'o'ryt.**t-"-J*1311 :
tt
.:::ffi/or Assignee of ' GAS
Witness nY hand and official seal
MY conmission exPires:
STATE OF COLORADO )- k'i /'0 ss '
COUNTY OF E#E )
Easement
1987, by
Electric
Witness mY hand and official seal'
My commission exPit"t' y''/ 7/
oEary
STATE OF COLORADO )) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The fbregoing Vacation and
was acknowledged before t" tn::
bA Orla.'rt' f/S)'fuffi%;e'a //6q
Abandonment of Existing t;;;T'il;
-
daY ofoffir and
tliEness uy hand and official seal'
My connission exPires:
;l
o(
STATE OF COLORADO
COT'NTY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
The foreeoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existingwas -acknowledfed Sefore ,." -tt i" ;L"q;;'"; i't-d4J . _,_.t)d.r,'^4) .*. /(t_+-.t../ as Fl tJi-l-. oE-u-ppEn EAGLE.'CONSOLIDATED SANItAtTOW qISTRTCT
The foregoing vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easementwas acknowledged before me this _ day of ; fgAZ, -6-i
s= s oilE oTTiid, ;*il;
=
i, .
Eo,FACILITIES, INC., a Colorado corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My counnission expires :
lc
)
)
)
)) ss .
)
)) ss.
)
ss.
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existingwas acknowledged before me rhis _ d"i ;f-____
-
3S --.-.:----....---ass Siit-corpora.iir,.tttt crcss
Witness rny hand and officlal seal.
My commission expires:
STATE OF COLOMDO
COIJNTY OF EAGLE
Easement
1987, byElectric
Easement
1987, by
VALLEY
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
lO ri"..r.l i :.,1
corporation.
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
Abandonment of Existing Easement
)) ss.
)
Tlre foregoing VacaEion andwas-{cknoyvl,e$Sed before ne Fhis ,.<;.:^ day of
as
O[rPany,
o*#Fan,i.l33l'ot
ATTEST:BY:
STATE O['COLORADO
COUIITY OF UAGLE
. ye;, ac.ku owl.-.e..d ge d
The foregoing Vacation arrd Abandonmentcknowl.-e..dged before me this i,--:;'". d4y qf,,--:;'"' daY gft'.:rr.-L tl- i; \.,-r"i al t-sl.i- o
IJicness my hand ancl off icial seal -
lly comniss ion expires : . li ..1 i1
I,litness my hand and official seal .
l"ly comnrission expires : tl t; r .. - l _
-'---
'!
|
Eain BelI, a Colorado
:tti" U
THE SITZ}IARK AT VAIL, INC., AColorado corporation
Existing Easement
__t 1987, byJIEZr[ark at
)) ss.
)
of
ti \...
, -.,q,.;:,," - ,,-*#,.,r,$
lrOc
trJ
Nlr)
bol|r)i
@l
org.q
t
o
:
co
|l,
Y,t-
\.r)2\t2
u)
7zt2 r-- --I z,
I
I
I
;
1.?.F:
.9
n
o(o
@i
al
r.:)ro
AJ
xoo
€ro-lo
qr:
E,d
:o
C
(|.
uJ
F()
EF ;ffi
2.v
$
i,
I
Ilro
ALTA LOAN POLICY-Modlll.d tOl73
ORDER NO. r 2306-VC2 SCHEDU
PART
EB
This policy does not insure against ross or damage by reason of the folrowing:
l. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the pubric records.
2. Easements. or claims or easements, not shown try the public records.
3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a
correct survey and inspection,of the premises would disclose and vvhich are not shown by thepublic records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,
imposed by law and not shown by the public recoros.
5. Taxes for Lhe year 1986 and Lhrrr'(:af t.-rr, arr,J any apecial assessnentor clrerges not yet certif tecl t'u Lt.re ot'f ice of Ltre- Courrby Treasrtrer.
6. Regtrictlons whiclr d.o not, contai.rr l f ,:,r i eiLut.: or reverierclauge, but; onrll,illrq ycggt- icti,:-rnr: , it .rny, ba srlr.l Crn race,coro!', rerigion, or ntrLlonal ori.;!n,.rs contairred in insLrunenLrecorded August 10, lgbl, 1n Book 174 at. pagr_, ]?!.
7. PaftlaI Vaeat-lon rrrr.l ltr;r n,l nnrnon r- r.r' ^,vi cr i..,. F-.,^-^-!
L
I
8.
corporation, SiLznark liroperLir:s, a (Jclor a.<trt LIniLecIPartnerghip arr<l IIoIy (Jrr:ss filect ri c irsr;,-.rci,ert:ion, Inc. ,a cooPeratlve corporlt.lorr recor(l{:'(l c,v::!nt,tf r- 16, 19R2 tn llcruk348 at Page BBg as Recepti.rrn lJ<i. l4,ji:.10.
9. Teruc, conditlons, resLr!.ction and st i pr-r.l.al;itrns ae containedtn any exlstlng suhleases arrcl Lerr*rrr:1e:..:,
Exceptions Numbered are hereby omitted.
I thru 4
| 423
l2oM 6.8t4 |S'f IjAV,TRT TITLD
ova na trTt coxParit
vfv()vzo
.'2 -- -. ' t.. ,l t\ttz,^n*1t'+-Ttfue- ffiTT f Uec.,c.1r" J
Ft"?<q^\
CA,lb Me:
9tr*.'<t T14,ol?
0
Policy No.:
Pooe 3
.'t|F1F-
je_rltl-tlIed ror Recofi-Aun-r?,L9?h at ]- P M e)6/22 ..-i .' li'.4.T ' PARTIAL VACATION AND AB}.NDONIIENT OF DXISTING EASEI4ENT. and
e GRANT OF NEt'', EASE:4ENT
THIS INSTRUMENT is made this 23$ a"y e; June ,1974,
by and between TtlE sITzltARK AT vA:mC., a Colorado corporation,
and SITZIIARK PROPEITTIES, a Colorado Limited Partnership,(hereinafter "Owners"), and IIOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,
MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPI.IOI{E AND TELEGiLq,PH COI4PANY, d/b/A
MOUI{TAIN BELL, PUDLIC StrRVICE CO;'iPANY OF COLORADO (for itself
and as assignee of, or successor in intcrest to, GAS FACILITIES,
rNc.), and the vlrl. WATER AND SANTTATTOi{ DTSTRTCT, (herelnafter
collectively "Easement Users"), and Vn IL ASSoCIATES, INC.., a Colorado 'corporation, a.nd the TOIJN OF VAIL, a l'lunicipal corporation,
WHEREAS, a cerCain ten (10) .foot easement over the
northerly ten (I0) feet of Tract a, Vail Village First Filing,
VaiI, Colorado, was created by VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. in the originalvail. Village Fj.rst Filing Plat, filed under Reception Nunber 96382
at Pages 49 and 50 in t.hc PIat Book of tagle County, Colorado,
allowing Easement Users the use of such easemen! for the construction,
maintenance and reconstruction of sewerage, water, gas, electric
and telephonc transmission facilitiesr (hereinafter the "Utility.Easement" ) ; and,
IIHEREAS, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO is the assignee
of, or successor in interest to, GAS FACILITIES, INC., which
obtained the right to use the Utiliey Easement by an instrument
recorded July 24, L964, in Book I83, at Page I57 in the records of
Eagle County, Colorado; and,
liltlDnEAs, the Utility Easement is not presently being used
and the Easement Users have no present intention of using such
Easement; and,
WUEREAS, a portion of Owners' building, the Sitzmark Lodge,
Iocated on the property described on Exhibit A attached lrereto
and incorporated herein, is located on a portion of the Utility
Easement as located on Ownersr land; and,
$ltlEREAS, VAIL ASSOCIATDS, INC., the original Grantor of such
Easement, desires to grant a utility easement on its property which
adjoins that of Owners to permit the Utility Easemen! to pass
around t,he corner of Ownersr building; and,
wiiEREAS, VAIL ASSOCfATES, by Lease recorded December 8, 197I,in Book 222 aE Page 518 in the records of Eagle County, Colorado,
Ieased to the TOWN OF VAIL certain real property j.ncluding that overwhich the ner., easement wj,ll be located,
NOI^I, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promides
contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived and other
good and valuable consideraCion,' the parties hereto hereby covenant
and agree as follows i ..
I. Easement Users and VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., on behalf of
themselves, their successors and assigns, by t,his instrument herebyforever abandon, vacaE.e, release and terminate that portion of theUtility Easemeng, as described above, on vrhich cert.ain improvements
have been built, rvhich improvemcnts are known as The Sitzmark Lodge
and located on the real property ciescribed in Exhibit A at.tachedhereto and incorporatsed hcrcin; [asenent Users hereby convey alltheir right, title and interest in arrd to that portion of theUtility Easement vacated above, to Onners.
2. VAIL ASSOCIATES. INC., as owner of the following described
property, hcrcbir qrants a ten (I0) foot utility easement to and
for the use of the prcsent and future or.rners of Blocks, Lots and
Tracts in the VaiI Village First Filing for the construction,
naintenance and reconstructlon of sewerage, l.rate! r gds, electric
and telephone transmission facilities, as follows:
- ,U"J --
i"6oroiiao corPo:ation^*^g;;!?'r.. ::"i)JVf,,t/-p,btes^t-i,:By
,ii-;\.t, jry'.),.)'.);,SITZMARK PROPERTIESfrFa!v :,' i:T#";";;; ;;d P 1ry"' ::'1;;,,,.!it,,,;i:.' u, {4F F"u&Hrou,
fioLY cRoss ELEcrRrc
^ ^t^t^9:l::l?:
VAIL
A COI
ASSOCIATES 'ado CorPor
l/ce<
an u;'
-2-
'.:" iO
. An easemenc I0'00 f::!'it width' Iocated in Tract Ir
vai,l villaq"^itt"a-Eiring,^and ueing adjacent to a
n;':;:'!"i'";:i;l1!,:it'i*:.:r$ilii::iq"ii'"'"1"n
iirl"i' counev of Eavrer s;1
oarticulariv-i"""tiued as follows: '
tb'*o""ng at tl9 "I"':!:'::"::'ti: i:'ii:?t?'ii:""'
$;:::"';:l'ii-liii;'"?::i.:?i:[: niii";: i:s;tritli,,
$,tnc" N'03o38's0"E'' ll:-Y'.' i;;;'";";;ia tract at thence
fr ;? rl:*ili ;l: liill":irrlli::i:ii,i;:i"T ;ii i:ii-
d,o the poinl of oeginning; containrng roz >e'
or less '
3. By \"av. of clarifituli9l^119 further description'
Exh ib it B a ttacned i'"i'il-'"a" il:? :?';:::i"l?:' iil'u:;:g:i:;"t"".f,"-r"""tion of the existi"e Y!lll.t: ulos€,oer.rr routrng the
!ii'*"ir Lo999r lq: :';:.1;:.t'::l:I'"'?=ti"-u"iiai"g'ea""mant around E.e rrv t
^ L.i -,r i n., rrDon .f nd inure to
*"ol;"rTt'lruH'.':::.:::"::'::u':::ln:::;"$:'#ii""r'"'"to'
THE SITZMARK AT VAIL'.INC'
rjli:l',i l-:l
By
Ey
W
By
t:
Attest3
t.,l t/../.--
(r
OF COLORADO
couNry oF EACI-E i"'
dirly acknov,'Iedged before me th-is 12!h
Scanley Nqcal as Pre6ffi
SEEiEtary-FIi6LY cRoss
wiii'6-sFmv-Eind and official seal. .uy
Aoril 12
STATE OP
STATE OF COLORADO
COLORADO
COUNTY OF
ss.
was duly ackrrowlcdged before me
[--")
t i.r. )
was
l-'rr
t.Jf L-(\
Successor
my hand
by 'r'.' \'"-L ,), n'c )/: t as
duly ac knovr I ed g ed before me this '-gas Vicr, Pres iden c
Sadet.a;t of PUBLTC
and/or Assignee
official seal.
Lary P
this l\+\
Pres identof VAIL
to,
and
n
COUNTY ss.
f,t1,."i,I':i\:,1:i'
l'.X*,",r '1,---:-::----.--:l Notaryr,'PubIic ;
STATE OP COLORADO
COUNTY OF
The foregoing wt
ilay pf \ r'Sr.,,191,4., I
ana \ .,-1)r'. *q1 (-'t (-'i\,
ASSOCIATES , INC. Wi tncss
comrniss ion expires i"r i-' : :"
-3-
ss.
My
a-,
OF COLORADO
OT EAGLE
'lrand and official seaL. My conunission exPires /b2o 07?
)) ss.
)
(ll
The foregoing was duly ack.rlowledged ,\efore me this 'nt'\tr
day of . '.it(r'l: - ,.!97.1 , bY,, f.it, =',;..:
ttr..[i(,;ir: \' in'iFgy\*^,-
o! q,ne rown o! varr, a nrunrcrp?lic@y
. ...r.Ji.'Y
I
"l
I
I
{l ,=e i
EXIiIBIT A
A parE of LoE' a-in Block 5-B il .VAIL VILLr\GE' FIRSA FILING
in the councy "t i"6fo-in the statc of Colorado' more
ilt;i;ti;;-iY' acscr:'5cd .:; ror lorvs:
Commencinq at the llorthirest corncr-of said Lot a' thence
N 66018r0o" E.r""g-iri; liortirerly lil": of said Lot a
65 .4 5 f eet to an" 'I"i"-"oi"i
-ot -le-ginning; thence -continuing
arong t:he atores"ie';;";;;--qe'oo-e"ul; tfron"t s 85o15'52" E
t26.64 reet; tneni! i-oi;oa;os" Y.roo'oo feet to a point of,
intersectiorr witi"ih; ;;";;t;ii-liit of said Lot a; thence
s 79oI?'00" hl B6.Eq eeet to a-Point of curvei thence on an
anqre to the rignl'oi-si'22'48i'o"i irotg a curve to the right
havins a radi,rs ";;;'60 iuot tntr i;;;;;ti ansre of 16003'12"'
an arc distance or re'2I feeL..Lo t'pli"ti-intn6t' N 88oII'00" vl
ss.50 feet; thenJi il-ii;ooioo" t'l gefio"ilti to the true point
of beginning.
,..o
(
Or
.DNIIII]IT I]
I
I
I
lo.
\FtY',
or@l- r'ln..'Cy' . ' -:''Ov..u0
:i\: ':.:-t | '.: ,: '.
= T_:
l. ."
.l .:- ;
l'.',, .
lr :::l .
.9..
ii:
i rY.
1l
:h. t'.
,-..rt
jli',j .l*
. a.>;
R.'',r '';' :.' : . .. t ,''.... : :':,'.:\, ., :,,3 *.;,'.t:.;.ii,.'',' .. .:'-':: ..:. ..';;r-i,. .i_ ,...,, ... .. 1I .i;, . '..,,r, , ' ,: , ,,i;:
t:-' ,':,;l;.ii-ri==1...i, \:.i,i:.e- ;,1.-r; ' ..,.,.: ..,.-'i,.: ... ,":t#:.*.-:ti.;,'*'' r\'1 :; ''1.
: 'r';;. ., , i ',i^' ,':: '
t ; .. '.i :'' i.tpr:i;ii.ii \,..'.'.
: , . . : ..;.'.......:'''.:j: j.' j. ' ,.1;-. li..:ii :.,.'':'.:"'1-'''L.;.' ) ;:-
-- -.. | . i.-.: "'
I
,
I._. ..-..-.._l , ,...
I
| ,l
"l
I
I
t.
i
I
I
i
I
fc.
C'.-l
\i.
Irrlr{i
vi
oc,
co,€.i .qlr- E
8€
EF !?OZ *:
=t5 >'88;
Bgl,..(, ii
HtrT
a/).
F{
cof)t'lctrl
ir$,$t;
trt
rX
- c.ro.-
\.i
X'r
P.:i
Hi::.\b\J
!r.
g'$
't
@
r
lrJ
(\'()'9
arr,l;l
l;'
tssF
(N \6
l-:lcet,-+b-*'=
$lu o -.\o'!
tt\tt, \ur\
7
z
a
'
F
cJ
\f
ea.
! lrj
oleeo
BR\DGg
ts
ul
"zJ'o
c
l!
I
3
I
6
!I
,
75 rculh frontage road
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 oftlce of oommunlty development
February 19, Lgg'l
Mr. Duane PiperP.O. Box 5560Avon, Colorado gl_620
Re: Sitzmark Exterior Alteration
Dear Duane:
Below are additionar conments by Birr Andrews, Town Engineer, thatrelate to the Sitzrnark exterior alteration:
1. There is a najor icing problern on the warkway north of thesitzmark which_is.caused by roof runoff from-the buirding. Aplan.for roof drainage and walkway drainage should besubnitted.
2. A revocable right-of-way pemit shouldthe existing and proposed-encroachmentsincluding oierhanls.'
3. A title report should be subnmitted ineasements.
Please let me know if you have any questions
conments.
Sincerely,
r/ I !n I{ '-t lt .l
InFr\\ r{ThKristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP:br
be subnitted for allon Town property
order to check
about these
o
lown
75 south f?onl.ge road
v.ll, colorrdo Ol6Sz
(303) a76-7000
january 6, 1987
oltlce ol communlty dcvslopmenl
Mr. Duane Piper
Box 5560
Avon, Colorado 81620
Re: Sitzmark Exteri or Alteration
Dear Duane:
Even though the Sitzmark exterior a'l teration is in the process of being
revised, the staff felt that it would be helpful to give you these comments
concern ing the proposal :
1. A site plan at a scale of 1" = 20'that shows the area of the addition
as wel'l as surrounding improvements such as Vajl Road, the two
pedestrian bridges to the north of the project., sjdewalks and entranceto the Sitzmark parking structure shou'l d be submitted. This wi lI helpto determine the relationship of the project to the surrounding s'ite in
more detai I .
A site plan showing existing and proposed landscaping should be
submitted. The staff was interested in seeing how the proposed exterjor
alteration would affect the existing alpine garden and large evergreen
on the west side of the Sitzmark.
Complete revised elevations and floor plans for the project.
4. A sun/shade analysis should be submitted. The staff was concerned about
the impact of the lodge additjon on sun on the north side of the
building.
5. The staff recommended that the addition of the accommodation units be
pushed to the south side of the build'ing and terraced as much aspossible to give relief to the facade.
6. The staff would like to emphasize that the existing large tree on the
northwest corner of the property shou'l d be saved and incorporated jnto
the new design.
2.
5.
7. The staff is considering the possibility of improvements to the eastern
pedestrian bridge such as stone facing on the bridge abutment. andpossjble addjtional landscaping by the western bridge to be includedwith this exterior alteration. I would I ike to discuss these
possi bi I i ti es wi th you.
8. The staff is also working with the Bel1 Tower building and Blu,s
restaurant on a possible paver improvement project along the Gore Creekpromenade. Jeff l.linston is working on a possible plaza and streetpaving design for the area. As soon as this genera) concept is drawn
up, the staff is proposing to hold a meeting among the property ownersin this general area.
9. It is suggested that you look at the possibility of expanding the retail
frontage on the north side of the building.
I hope these comments wjll be helpful to you in developing the revised designfor the Sitzmark. 0nce the revised drawings are submjtted. staff wi'l I be ableto give you a final Iist of connnents. If you have any questions about these
comments, please feel free to call me.
S i ncerel y,
K'l'L{"h
Kristan Pri tz
Town P'l anner
KP: br
o
75 south fronlage road
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
October 1, 'l 986
offlce of communlty dcvelopmenl
Mr. Bob Fritch
Sitzmark Lodge
182 East Gore Creek Drive
Va il , Col orado 8'1657
Re: Determination of designation of first floor real estate space
Dear Bob:
I am writing this letter to explain to you how the staff determined that the
office space (now a ga1 lery) is located on a first floor level at the
Sitzmark. The Commercial Core I zone district (Section 18.24.020) defjnes
basement or garden level as "that floor of a building that is ent'i rely or
substantially below grade." The first floor is defined as "that floor of the
building that is located at grade or street level ." (18.24.030) The secondfloori s defined as "the second floor above grade within a structure."
(18.24.040) Staff's opinion is that the location of the office space does not
meet the definitions for basement or second floor levels. Our opinion is that
the yogurt shop is on a basement or garden level . In between the basement
level and second floor is the location of the potential real estate office.It is not possible to have two floors from the yogurt shop up to the office
space so that the office would be on the second floor. This situatjon makes
the office first floor space.
Please note that the office space is a non-conform'i ng use. If the office use'is not resumed with'i n a year from when it was removed this surmer, the office
use wi l1 no 'l onger be al I owed.
I know that this is a complicated explanation! If you have any further
quest'i ons on our decisjon, please fee'l free to calI me.
Si ncerel y,
I allv-,-t v),DI\rt0 l llfL
Kristan Pritz
Town Pl anner
KP: brcc: Duane Piper
l,lEttlO T0:
FRolrl:
DATE:
RE:
Y-t
Sltzmark File
Com Dev
August 13, 1986
Vail Assoclates Real Estate
The Vail Assoclates Rea'l Estate office, 'located on ground floor, ceased
operatlon on or about August l, 1986. As a non-conforming use, the real
estate office mry be re-introduced if done so by August l; 1987.
' foiHiuhnnit [: lff?
0
$ /530.o3totaT Pa:f-Ing Fee
Vai1, Colorado, Af* b , ts9fi
In installments after date,
order of the Town of Vail atBuilding at VaiI, Colorado,
PROJECT
for value received,the Office of the
I pronise to pay to the
Finance Director, Municipal
Down Pa)4nent
with interest of ten percent peryearly installrnents as follows:
The first installment of S
the second installrnent of $
the third instalLment of
the fourth install-nent of
Dollars,
annum on the unpaid balance,payable in
due and payable on
due and payable on
due and payable on
due and payable on
$
$
It is agreed that if thj.s note is not paid when due or declared duehereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shall draw interestat the rate of 18 percent per annum, and that failure to make any payment,of principal or interest when due or any default under any incunbrance or
agreement securing this note shal-l cause the whole note to become due atonce, or the interest to be counted as principal, at the option of theholder of the note. The makers and endorsers trereof severally waivepresentment for palment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of protest, and
agree to any extension of tirne of paynent and partial payrnents before, at,or after maturity, and if this note or interest thereon ig not paid whendue, or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonable cost's of collection,including reasonable attorneyrs fees.
-i-fii-.JF"i ctF \-rFf i l__
ll i s-c* I I ln':urus f,,:=ir
irl':l " j '-i -i iti
i
a.-}t:; _t
r: i: r'r'lr.l
Project Applicatlon j" t5 .F1
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
, zone CC I
Design Review Board
/:- /)
D^r" 3" /5 '7?
DISAPPROVAL
fr; ..L ./,r .-,.L,.*./
Summary:
Town Plann6r E statt Approval
1d_ -Uufft't
THE SITZMARK LODGE
183 Gore Creek Drive
Vail , CO
T0: Design Review Board App'l icants for projects in CCI and CCII
FR0M: Department of Cormunity Development
Development proposals in CCI and CCII are reviewed by the Design Review Board
with respect to Design Considerations as outljned'in the Urban Design Guide
Plan. These Design Considerations address various architectura'l and landscape
features. It is the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate whether
their proposal is complying with these consideratjons. The Design Considerations
for the Village and Lionshead are available upon request. Please feel free to
contact Tom Braun or Kri stan Pritz with any questions you may have.
Vail Village
l Roofs
2. Facades
J.Bal coni es
Wa11 surfaces are white
adjacent surfaces.
Balconies occur from the
on the upper two leve1s.
existing condition.
Not applicable.
stucco to match existing
two expanded lodge rooms
Railins detail matches
Roof is of tar and gravel construction on a 2/L2 pitch '
Overhangs are 3t to 4t in length. Roof forms step down
towards the street. Fascia ii aoorox. 16tt to 18t' thk'
4. Decks and Patios
5. Accent Elements This addition is meant to blend in with adjacent
shapes and massesl therefore, no accent element
is desired.
5. Landscape Elements Extensive landscaping is being done on the west
side of the addi.tion in the design of an alpine
garden.
7. Service Service exists through the garage area and will
be widened approximately 8rr to improve vehicle
access .
Lionshead
Heights and m'issi ng
2. Roofs
Erarr{ac- ra'l 1 c 1c }rrrc'
LIST OF MATERIALS
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET AODRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P Addition (L4'XI7I footorint) to nest elevation
of Lodee. 3 stories olus basement mech- =room-
The following information is required for submjttal by the app'licant to the Design Review
Eoard before a final approva'l can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Roof
Qi,.lina
Other l,{a l I Materl al s
Fas ci a
Soffi ts
}li ndows
y{lnoow lmm
Doors
u00r I rlm
Hand or Deck
Fl ues. :
FIashings
Chimneys
match exist. (charcoal)
rough red_qedar dark brovm
-,;trasn Lnctosures
Greenhouses
0the'r
B. LANDSCAPING: Name
PLANT MATERiALS:
PROi'OSED TREES
Common llame
Refer to attached 1ist.
Tar and eravel natch existing (tan)
None
Sfrcro Whi ta
rough red cedar
lX6 T&G cedar dark brown
wood. orimed dark brown
green at office
none
,
none
none
Rails
none
galv- metal chareeal
qt. ...' fh*te
of Designer:
pnone:
Eotanical Name Quani ty
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
C,.rr.,
",.,.1
orrr Fi r
*lndjcate cal iper for deciducious trees.
r 15r
Indicate height for coni fers.
(over )
Helen Fritch
476 500
z
lr.l
E
trl
t
€
Ro
t1
H
H
HNHF{o
oAFI+t
, t tc
r')
!t
zoHHH
Q/
al
<l
$
$
,9 Zl
(92
-0l
lrJ
o
(,2
6J:l6
sego
|J
uJ
lz
\l
tr.l
=
Fc
trJ
oEG
J
3
l!o
GlllzEo(J
\
J
J
'x9
G
@
TE
'H:oJ
'z>-O(l:_ lrJ
SQ
BR\DG
L
O $'l
${ \L
^ t.0
rr(t
Ro
t;l
Htr
HNHf.{
cn
odFI
{J
. , 9'zl
(9z
I
G
UJ
o
(,z
aJ
o
Nrt
- .9'l'\r;
Y(J
lrJ
il
ltlJ
o2 esgo
-, tr,i.=
=Jbl
Ee.bl lr|ZO.GOoc(JO-
JJ.'
x
9c(D
\ ,\?,
trLl ,
=zc)J
zJ-oe;H<x
=- tr
-(
BR\D\' -zl'9
e9
SITZMARK I.,,ODGE GARDENS
PI,ANTING LIST
FIOWERING PIANTS
Achillea sp. (Yarrow)
Aethionena'Worley Rose'Allium sp.
Alyssum sax. ,Conpacta,- Basket of Gold
Alyssu"m wulfenianum
Anacyclus depressus
Androsace sarnentosa chunbyi
Anemone silvestris (Windflower)
Anthenis biebersteinLanaAquilegia aurea
Aquilegia balkalensis
Aquilegla caeruleaAguilegia elegantula
Aquitegia flabellata I'Nana AlbartAguilegia flabellata punila
Aguilegia jonesii
aguilegia saximontanaAquilegia viridifloraAguilegia vulgaris plena
Arabis alpina
Arabis bryoides
Arabis procurrens variegata
Armeria cephalotes rubra
Armeria maritima
Armeria maritina 'hrarf Sea Pink,
Artemesia frigida
Artenesia stelleriana (Dusty MiJ.ler)
Asperula gussonii
Aster novi-belgii 'Alert' (Michaelnas Daisy)Aster novi-belgii'Audrey'Aubretia deltoides
Aubretia deLt. 'Purple Gem'
Bulbocodium vernun
Canpanula cochlearifol ia
Campanula formaneckiana
Campanula garganica
Campanula rotundifolia (Harebell)
Cerastiun alpinun lantum
Chamaecllparis pisifera plunosa ,Aurea Nana'
Chrysanthemum alpinun
Colchicun autumnale album
Colchicum autumnale plenum
Colchicun'Autumn Queen'Colchicurn'Waterlily'
Coreopsis lance.'sunray'
Cotoneaster apiculata 'Tom Thumb'
Crocus 'Crean Beauty'Daffodil 'Geranium'Daffodil 'Ice Follies'Daffodil 'Thalia'Daffodil 'St. Patrick's Day'Daffodit 'Thalia'-1-
Daffodil triandrus "il"Daphne alpina
Delosperma cooperi
Dianthus g. ,Tiny Rubies,
Dianthus glaclalis ss. gelidus
Dianthus haenatocalyx
Dianthus mlcrolepis
Dianthus plumarius rKarlik,
DianthuE slmulans
Dianthus spotii ,Spot,
Dodecatheon pulchellum
Draba rigida
Dracocephalun botryoides
Edraianthus pumilo
Erigeron sp.
Erigeron chrysopidis brevifolius
Eriogonurn flavun
Eschscholzia californica (California Poppy)
Euphorbia polychrona (Cushion spurge)
Euryops acraeus
Gentiana sp.
Gentiana sino-ornata
Geranium endressii,Wargrave Pink,
Geranium sanguineum (Red Cranesbill)
Geraniun sang. lancastriense (Prostrate Cranesbill)
Glpsophila repens'Rosea'
Hebe cupressoides ninor
Helianthenum canum scardicun
Hel. ianthenun oelandicum
Helianthemun nunm,Orange Sunrose,
Helianthenum (White Sunrose)
Heuchera sp. (Coral Bells)
Heuchera cylindricaHlpericun reptansIris sp. (dwarf white)Iris danfordiiIrie nissouriensisIris reticulataIris setosa nana
Lewisia cotyledonLilliun 'Enchantment'Linum sp.
Linun alba
Lobelia cardinalis (Cardinal Flower)
Lotus corniculatum
l{ahonia repens
oenothera nissouriensis,Missouri Sundrops'
Penstenon cardwellii
Penstemon crandallii
Penstemon davidsonii
Penstemon digltalis
Penstemon hallii
Pensternon lateus roezii
Penstemon'PraLrie Dusk, (Beardtongue)
Penatemon plnifollus
Penstemon pseudospectabilis
PenEtemon richardsonii
Penstenon teucrioides
-2-
Phlox 'Betty "r"*",
O
Phlox bifida 'Alba,Phlox rnultiflora
Phlox sublata (lfhite)
Phlox sublata (Pink)
Phlox sp. (Native phlox)
Picea glauca echiniformis
Pinus mugo 'l{itsch Mini,
Platycodon grandiflorus,Albus, (Balloon Flower)Potentilla hippiana (lufted Potentilla)Potentilla verna nanaPuIsatilla vulgaris
Puschkinia lLbanotica
Raoulia australisSalvia argentea
Saponaria caespitosa
Saxifraga caespitosa,Mossy,
Saxifraga cotyledon
Saxifraga moschata minor
Sedum stelliforme
Sernpervivum arachnoideum
Sisyrhinchium nontanum (Blue-eyed Grass)Telesonix janesii
Thlmus pseudolanuginosus
Thlmus vulgaris'Argenteus,Trollius europaeusTulip 'Golden ltelody,fulip trirrmph ,Merry Widow'
Veronica 'Ala-Dag'Veronica bonbycina
Veronica incana
Veronica latifolia 'Crater Lake Blue,Veronica lewinensis
Veronica repensViola corsica
Zauschneria garrettiae
TREES AND SHRUBS
Mahonia (Oregon Grape Holty)
Genista lydia (Lydia Broom)Picea 'Montgonery'Abies concolor (White Fir)
The current gardens surrounding the Sitzmark L,odge are planted with theplant materials listed above. lhese materials will be replanted in thealpine garden following construction, supplemented by larger shrubs (2-3ft.) and trees (4-5 ft.). The intent is to create a garden with regionaldistinction through the use of alpines and other native plant material.
See list attached: Rocky Mountain Native Plants for Typical Garden Uses,
taken from Rockv Mountain Alpines, by the American Rock Garden Society and
Denver Botanic Gardens, Prepared for rrAlpines '86rrr the Second Interim
International Rock Garden Plant Conference, Boulder. Colorado; published
by Tinber Press, 1986.
-3-
l
T
COMMON NAMET
Shadc Trces
Common We8t€tn
Cottonwood
Narrowleaf
Cottonwood
Willow
Green Ash
Boxelder
Hackberry
BOTAMCAL NAME
Populus sorgentii
P, angustilolia
Solix sp.
Fraxinus pe nsyloanica
Acer negundo
Celtis occidentalis
Pinus erlulis
P. aristata
P. flerilis
luniperus scopulwum
Abies concolor
Populus trcmuloides
Quercus gambelii
Betula occidentalis
Crataegus sp.
kunus americana
Alnus tenuilolia
Acer gandidentatum
Cornus stolonifera (C.
sericea)
Shephodia argentea
Prunus melanocarpa
Phy suatpus inte rmediu s
Rhus glabra var.
cismontana
Cercocalus sp.
Nbes aureum
Herbaceous Flowet Borders and Beds
COMMON NAME*
Accent Shrubs
Soapweed
Thimbleberrv
Serviceberrl
Waxflower
Rocky Mountain Maple
Sandcherrv
Gayfeather
Yarrow
Aster
Penstemon
Sulphur Flower
Gaillardia
Goldenrod
Brown-Eyed Susan
Mountain Common
Juniper
Kinnikinnick
Oregon Holly Grape
Pussytoes
Wild Strawberrv
Westem Virgin's
Bower
Westem Clematis
Riverbank Grape
Virginia Creeper
Turf
Buffalo Grage
Kinnikinick
Shooting Star
Sulphur Flower
Gentian
Broomweed
Perky Sue
Mat Penstemon
Townsendia
Zauschneria
Q*rrn*teGardeas 26L
BOTANICAL NAME
Yucca glauca
Rubus deliciosus
Amelanchier sp,
Jamesia americana
Acer glabrum
Prunus besseyi
Liattis punctata
Achillea millelolium
Aster sp.
Penstemon sp.
Eriogonum umbellatum
Gaillardia aristata
Solidago sp.
Rudberckia hirta
luniperus communis
Arctostap hy los uaa-ursi
Befteft (Mahonia)
fews
Antennaria sp,
Fragaria ameriuna
CIe natis ligustic if olia
C, columbiana
Vitis aulpina
P arthenocixuc oitacea (!.
inserta)
Buehlci dactyloides
Arcto staphylos uu a-urci
D ode cathe on p ulchellum
Eriogonum umbellatum
Gentiana parryi
Guttiernia sarothrae
Hymenoxys acaulis
Pensternon caespitosus
Toutnsendia *scapa
Z-aus chne r i a c oli f or n ic a
Table 33.1. Rocky Mountain Native Plants for Typical Garden Uses
lt
fi
Euergreen Trec Screens, Windbreaks, and Solid
Masseg
Ponderosa Pine Pinus pondercla
Colorado Blue & Green Picea pungens
Spruce
Pinyon Pine
Brietlecone Pine
Limber Pine
Colorado Junipcr
White Fir
Small Accent Trccs
Quaking Aspen
Scrub Oak
Rocky Mountain Birch
Hawthorns
Wild Plum
Mountain Alder
Big Tooth Maple
TalI Shrubs lot Foundalion ot Bcckgrounil
Plentingc
Red Twig Dogwood
Buffaloberry
Wegtem Chokecherry
Ninebark
Rocky Mountlin
Sumac
Mountain Mahogany
Buffalo Currant
Artemisia sp.
Potentillo fruticosa
(Pentaphiiloides
floibunda)
Rhus trilobata
Rosa sp.
Chrysothamnus
tuuseosu9
Ribes cercum
ColoradoColumbine Aquilegiocaerulet
I-out Epreadlng Plants lor Ground Cooer
I
Climbing Plants fot Ecnces and We s
Ground coaers anil low perenaials fot rock getdcnl
Alpine Columbine Aquilegia saximontana
Wild Yarrow Achillea lanuloso
Iout Ehtubs lot Fourdation Plortings, Beds, anil
Borderc
Sage
Potentilla
Three [.eaf Sumac
Native Roge
Rabbitbrush
Squaw Currant
-All namee used here are consietent with nomenclature in Med The Natives, by M. Walter Pesman (1975).
o o
lnwn
OwN*,Phone
NumbqsArc!
479-2rs8
4na$9
75 routh frontage roed
vrll, colorado 81657
(303) {76-7000 ofllcc of communlly d.uolopmcnl
February 14, 1989
Mr. Duane Piper
P.O. Box 5560
Avon, Colorado 81620
Re: Sj-tzrnark Lodge
Dear Duane,
At their public meeting of February 13, L9Bg, the Town of VailPlanning and Environmental Conrnission unanimously approved yourrequest for an exterior alteration, on the southwest corner ofthe Sitzmark Lodge, with the following conditions:
1. That the 15' evergreen tree be relocated to Torm property,
south of the pedestrian bridge over core Creek, innediatelynorth of the Sitzmark.
2. That tbe Design Review Board analyze the proposed
landscaping for this addition, as well as the relocation ofthe tree, as mentioned above.
Enclosed is your receipt for the exterior alterationapplication fee. If you should have any guestions please feelfree to call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
/1-/* n&lr
Mike MoIIica
Planner II
llM: sur'Enclosure
with findingspublic health
of no grantor welfare.
Motion: Grant Riva - Ittove that request be approved as subnittedof special- privilege, no detriment to
approval,unit, with
above
Second: Pam Hopkins
Vote: 3 - 3 (Note: A tie vote is deerned a denial)
4. Pierce/Fritzlen - Rezoninq:
Presentation by Mike Mollica. Recomrnendation for approval
based upon Land Use Plan, surrounding zoning and allowance
for an enployee housing unit.
Motion: Diana Donovan -staff memo.
Second: Sidney Schultz
Move reconnendation of approval per
Vote: 6 - 0
5. Pierce,/Fritzlen Variance to Minimum Lot Size:
Staff presentation by Mike MoIIica. Recornmendfeels there is a benefit to adding an employeea condition that the Town Council approve the
referenced re-zoning.
Vote:
Motion: Donovan - Approve per staff memo, noting theGiffifons oi approvat.
Second: Peqqy Osterfoss
Sitzrnark
Staff tation by Mike Mollj-ca. Recommendation for
apl5Eoval with condition that the existing large spruce tree
be relocated on site.
Duane Piper - Representing the applicant, nade a briefpresentation regarding uraintenance and space needs. Theexisting tree does need to be renoved to accornmodate theaddition. The applicant wishes to expand the al.pine garden
landscape concept and feels smal-ler trees would conplinentthat type of landscaping better. With regard to parking
Duane feels that the creation of a new parking space by
removing the boiler should cover the required parking of
the addition. Bob Fritch, the Sitzrnark owner spoke to the
Iandscaping issue.
Diana Donovan - Feels the buitding needs some tall vertical
landscape elements. DRB should examine this.
Pegcrv Osterfoss - Seconded the motion.motion followed.Discussion of the
arification of Motion: Until we (PEC) find out what the State
approve.Hi way Department wants and will
Votei 3 for, 1 against, 2 abstain
McMahan - Asked for a clarification of th PEC motion.
He u1d like clear direction as to what rmation the
h tal should present.
Discussion
A decision
3/27/8e.
f this issue followed.
made to have a work session n this issue on
3. McCue Vari
presen tion by Kristan tz. Staff recommendsper sta f memo regard criteria and findings.
plicant an owner gave his present,ation
. A11 ighbors agree that the variancein the area. None areial privilege, many adjacent
valopposed. This is
hornes already have itions.
BiIl Pierce - Propert was zoned while in Eagle
a
v
annexed to Town, and not be properly zoned.le except to adjacentencroactunent is not IS
have no problem.
Sidnev Schultz -Apparentl was not presentthe previous variance
handled wi
Staff
denial
Robert McCue -_------.-.--:---requesE,rng apprwill inprove pr
lstaf f ,
County,
Deck
owners who
est, however,addition could be
encroachnenti"
out this degree
Diana Donov'an - Feels direction council was that 250square fc6t addition should not a ow variances to this
degree.,,' Distance between building is too close.
comments regarding the
250
Riva - Agrees with direction
at PEC duringdo feel thatof
however, given attitude ofvote in favor of this.
from Council andrs and low irnpact,
giv
neigI would
Jiur Viele - Agree with Grant for a little fferent reason.
Persuaded that variance criteria are being'.net so couldvote for it.
,t
Sidnev Schultz - Was staff atrare of the creation of a newparking space through this application?
Peter Patteq - Responded to Sidneyrs question with aaGusslon of the -intention of the CCI zone d.istrict withregard to parking.
Motion: Donovan - Approve per the staff memo, tree rnust be
re:-oElEea nelr peaistrian bridge. oie to look atlandscaping closely.
Second: Grant Riva
Vote: 6 -0
Vail Mountain School:
Staff presentation ofPritz. Recornmendation
will
Conditional Use Pernrit by Kristanis for approval with conditions:
l-. CDOH approval of relocated bike path.2. Rockfall nitigation prior to building perrnit.3. Irrigation of landscaping on CDOH property willrequire CDOII approval .
Vail Mountain School - Variance requests for site coverage
and front setback (parking). Kristan Pritz gave the staffpresentation. Staff recommendation is for approval , therequests are reasonable and the site can handle the
variances.
John Milan (Architect for the project) - Presented asection drawing through the parking/bike pathr/berrn area.
The CDOH has verbally approved the bike path on the stateproperty and will follow-up with a letter shortly. He
discussed the possible rockfall hazard at the site and alsopresented the landscape plan for the project.
Grant Riva - Overall scherne is good. Traffic circulationis also good. Pleased with project and is in favor.
Pesqv Osterfoss - Questioned rockfall nitigation. I{iIl gyrnwall be able to handle the blow from a falling boulder?
,fohn Milan - Woodward-Clyde is the geologic consultant anddo further study, however, the rear wall of the qym.be designed to nitigate any rockfall.
Peqqrr Osterfoss - Overall plan is a positive irnprovement.Are all those parking spaces needed?
John Milan - Not really, but it will be buffered bylandscaping.
o -1.
Dian4 Donovan - Have bike path curve around the existinge;aes, Iim;a of just a slraight shot. cars may be paikedtoo close to the soccer field. DRB should look at
landscaping.
Sidnev Schultz - Questioned the verLical separation betweenthe Frontage Road and the bike path?
John Milan - About 6t or 7t.
Jirn Vlele - Mountain School has been a good neighbor. RunEIEath- as originally planned and do iot reloiateexisting trees.
Motion: Grant Riva - Conditional Use Pernit, approve assulrnEEd-with conditions 1 - 3 listed-in staff merno.
Second: Diana Donovan
Vote: 5 - O (Pan Hopkins abstained)
Motion: Diana Donovan - Approve variances per staff neno
Second: Peqqv Osterfoss
vote: 5 - o (Pan Hopkins abstained)
8. Vail Run Satellite Dish - Variance Request:
Rick Pylnan - Presented the staff memo. Staff
recommendation is for approval. Hardship has been shown
and it would not be a grant of special privilege. Color iswhite.
Motion: Peqqy Ost?Tfo?s - Approval of variance. DRB shouldreguire additional landscape screening if tennis
bubble is ever renoved.
Second: Grant Riva
vote: 5 - 0
9. Bed and Breakfast Ordinance:
Peter Patten - Updated the PEC on the progress of the Bed
and Breakfast ordinance.
a
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUB.TECT:
UEMORANDI'M
Planning and Environmental Cornmission
Conmunity Developrnent Department
February 13, 1989
Reguest for an exterior alteration on the
southwest portion of Lot A, Block 5-8, VaiIVillage First Filing (Sitznark Lodge), to expandtwo acconnodation units and expand lodgeoperations and reservations space.
Applicant: Mr. Bob Fritch/Duane Piper
I. The Proposal
The applicant is requesting an exterior alteration andaddition at the Sitzmark lodge, which would inctude thefollowing improvements incorfioiated into a four-levelvertical expansion at the southwest corner of the lodge:
1. Addition of a new mechanical/boiler room, at thegarage (lowest) level . This expansion would be 14'6nX 17'O'r in size, for a proposed footprint size of
246.5 square feet.
2. Expansion of the main level lodge operations/reserva-tions areai addition of 246.5 square feet.
Expansion of a second level accommodation unit by l-53square feet.
Expansion of a third level accommodation unit by 153
square feet.
5. The addition does reguire removal of a 15, sprucetree. The applicang has proposed to relocate the treeto the Alpine Garden in Ford Park.
II. Zonincr.Considerations
The following summarizes the zoning statistics regardingthis exterior alteration reguest:
1. Zone District3 Commercial Core I
2. Lot Area: O.4O77 acres,/L1 1759 square feet
3.
4.
3.Densitv: Allowable dwelling units = 1Oi or 2O A.U.Existing dwelling units = L8.5 (1 D.U. + 35
A.U. )
4.GRFA:
5.Site Coveraqe: (.80 of lot
Allowable =Existing =Current Renaining
Proposed =
Proposed dwelling units =
(.80 of 1ot area)
Allowable = L ,ZO7Existing L3,L97Current Rernaining = 1,OLO
Proposed = 305
704
No change
square feetsquare feet
square feetsguare feet
s. f. remainder;if new additionis approved
area)L4,2O7 sguare feetL2,535 square feet
= L,672 sguare feet
246.5 square feetL,425.5 s.f. remainderiafter proposed
expansion6. Heiqht: The Design Considerations for Vail Villagereguire that up to 60* of the building have a naxirnunroof height of 33t or less, and that no more than 40?of the building have a naxinurn roof height of 43r.The height of this proposed addition is 32, at itshighest point and the roof tapers down to 3Or.
7. Parkinq: Parking for this proposed expansion will beaddressed by the applicant paying into the Townparking fund for CCI .
II. Compliance With The Purpose Section of the CCI Zone
V The Comrnercial Core I zone district is intended to providesites and to maintain the unique character of the vailVillage conmercj-al area, with its mixture of lodges andcommercial establistrments in a predominantly pedestrianenvironment. The Cornmercial Core I district is intended toensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenitiesappropriate to the pernitted tlpes of buildings and uses.The district regulations in accordance with the VaiIVillage Urban Design PIan and Design Considerationsprescribe site developnerit standards that are intended toensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightfycrustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrian
ways and public areenways, and to ensure continultion ofthe building scale and architectural qualities thatdistinguish the Village.
This proposal, as a minor addition, is in cornpliance withthe intent of the purpose of the CCI zone district.
t'
,,V-Ifi. Compliance With The Urban Desiqn Guide Plan For Vail
r
The following Cuide Plan concept relates to this proposal:
No. 288 Building Expansion. Suilding mass should bestepped back to the soutlr to preserve and frarnedown-valley views, as designated in the viewcorridor map. Infill of parcel will help
- / enclosure of Checkpoint Charlie Circle.ru
25. Cgrnpliance With The Urban Desiqn Considerations For VaiIViIIaqe
1. Pedestrianization
This addition will have no impact upon pedestrian
circulation within the Vail Village area.
2. Vehicular Penetration
This addition will have no irnpact upon vehicularpenetration within the Vail Village area.
3. Streetscape Framework
The Design Considerations strive to irnprove thequality of the watking/pedestrian environment bypromoting the use of landscaping, berns, grass andflowers as a linkage along pedestrian routes.
As Willow Bridge Road is one of the nain pedestrianroutes into the Village, the staff feels that nature
landscaping in this area is a necessity for the
enhancement of the pedestrian experience. Inaddition, the Commercial Core I Zoning states that t'no
reduction in landscape area shall be pernitted withoutsufficient cause shown by the applicant or asspecified in the Vail village design considerations'f.
(18.24.170)
An existing 15, spruce tree will have to be relocatedas a result of the p.roposed addition. Staff feelsthat the tree should either be relocals6 irnrnediatelyto the west of the addition, or into the planter areajust south of the parking garage access, and shouldnot be relocated off-site.
I
5.
The guidelines emphasize that building facade heightsnot be uniform fron building to building and that theyshould provide a comfortable enclosure for the street.This proposed expansion will provide a stepped back
appearance to the southwest corner of the lodge aswell as contribute to the street enclosure in theCheckpoint Charlie area.
Street Edqe
This criteria encourages buildings in the Village Coreto fonn a strong but irregular edge to the street.
The proposed addition will meet this criteria,
however limited in scale, due to the scope of theproj ect.
Buildinq Heiqht
This proposal has no inpact on building height.
7. Views
4.Street Enclosure
This proposal will have
8. Service and Deliverv
No inpact.
9. Sun/Shade
This proposal will notspring and fall shadowor on the public ROW.
Staff Recommendation
no inpact on views.
substantially increase thepatterns on adjacent properties
6.
v.
Staff recommends approval of this request for an exterioralteration. We feel that the proposal complies with al} ofthe applicable design considerations of the Vail VillageUrban Design PLan.
Staff recommendation for,approval includes the followingcondition:
That the applicant agrees to relocate the spruce tree asstated above (Streetscape Framework), and that theapplicant suburit a letter of credit in an appropriate
amount, which would ensure the safe relocation of the tree,including a l.-year rirarranty period beginning on the date ofrelocation.
It
H
(,
Ro
l.t
H4
EN
F{
d
osf
I
t{oo
F
CNul
=
,..-..,..:4.._+C'l:l
.s{6 trr f-o
(:
C
(i\:
6
6
-T
I
I
I
I
---l-: -fe_
G
TF
:)o
U'
Ti 71 o
6lC f,*/-,t"r"<- V.< A A./r* G4^-/r* ta * f;t sh,/
.14
)-;^ .- H* beZ 4er,b'u- ,% ) a* ,,24'A;-.
A7'4 b G*-t 7
Ut"r;*J- T
L
,Tr-'.F /&a^t'-h1
ltu| % ,UlF't /+'<
J b;^) b-o nr r-*<Mfr/ h,(
tr ,"./ ,"/rid- - ,r,.^"-n'*',- 'h rt'l' 14/-v ' ./t4
ErcA at*b fu^A
aoVrJ4 Fz<- C"Z^J.^44-- 5;t=n^*K
eX,:f
. 154
68FA ( ,,*+ ^-^)Y
6KF+
jx 2 ^tsooo :.
= 3t5f
/53 f
{4seo
.4
,3t9 (^"\
.',:n o*r'4
,r
.7 bg
No a/J,4-l fr A a-J.-l f ,,a,; r'l
lrni^ :t
T-.*(*/ -4e4 *a-o-cr-.
-\//tt-14.r42+b\\_- -)
nf,sfrr E/fh,J.l A( '/'4 ,4 \o-^e- ^ /+ *
\
o
{ 4 "> 33' lL -4.^
/4 Al';a 33' a.J 43t
/oo %-O- z
Go, ^*\
(o* -*\
_4.
Op
E
a
.C
!tFotoaq
G'oo Decenber 10, 1988
I"like Mollica, Town Planner
O Office of Community Development
Al Town of Vail
P 75 S. Frontage Rd. W.
O Vail, C0 81657
oo!,|o
Io!
I0ac
deleniated.
2) Have indicated additional detail to the south elevation.
3) F1oor plans now indicate line of expansion.
4) Sun/Shade studies for Dec. 21 and Jun 21 in morning hours.It should be noted that no shadow is cast after noon.
5) I have overlayed a photo wi.th a line sketch of the new
expansion to show simple mass forms.
will also try to provide you with a clearer site plan as soon as
can get it reproduced.
find this all in order.
Duane Piper
\
A\ € Re: Sirzmark Lodge Exrerior Alreration
\t., I>< h Dear l"like:/\Jg
- + E- rn response to your l-etter of December 7, LgB8, please find the
n f aconpanying drawings and study data as follows:\,9
O 1) Havenofisdthe elevations as ttnew additionrrand further
Slncerly;
FE-c
JLa
E€ctro!
oo
ebe ft\4
Jrfr.ts 4J nU" 44
L
€zJA /9btu A!4i€re r
At4'AttW
W ff41 Flrtl
fu,?l Vrury
(-tbterrb ++d #1+ il4q
OwNewPhone
NumbsAd
479-438
4n-2139
75 toulh trontage road
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 offlcr of communlly dcvrlopmcnl
December 7, 1988
Mr. Duane Piper
Box 5560VaiI, Colorado 81658
Re: Sitznark Exterior Atteration
Dear Duane:
This letter is intended to docunent our phone conversationtoday in which you agreed to follow-up on the following iternsby the end of this week:
,''t. Highlight all eLevations of building to clarify theproposed addition.
'/2. South etevation needs to show more of tbe existingarchitectural details (i.e. window patterns, etc.).
/3. Floor plans - Label area of proposed addition and anyexisting wall-s which are proposed to be removed.
,/ a. Provid.e a graphic sun/shade analysis, as diEcussed.
/5. Provide a more detailed view analysis (i.e. photos with
overJ.ays of proposed expansion).
6. Provide a cleaner copy of the site plan, detailing theproposed landscaping, with sizes of all proposed plantrnaterials labelled.
If you should have any questions regarding these itens, pleasefeel free to call rne at 479-2t38.
Sincerely,
nA nra;-
'' Mike Mollica
Town Planner
e
November 27, 1988
THE SITZMARK LODGE
Remodel and Additions
183 Gore Creek Drive
Vail , Colorado
PROPOSAL
The Sitzmark Lodge requests an addition and improvement to the existingfacility. The addition is described as a four level- vertical expansj-onstatting with the basement and/or garage level and locat.ed on t.he wesE faceof the 1odge.
Garage Level: Construct a new rnechanical room (14r X 17t) of 238 s.f .
Ihe existing boiler is 18 years old and is requiring
increased maintenence. The plan is to install a series
:f "::".l:'l-;:f lilHI.::':il",::[:ll.:1",::H. "u+i:':;.::u
gained by this demolition will become a ner{ ent.rance to the
lodge frorn the garage and one additional parking space.
Main Level: This 1eve1 reflects the same footprint as the mechanical
room below; adding 238 s.f. The space will be used to
improve lodge operations and reservatj.ons.
Second Level: I":::;'il'"1;:';r'ill llri"i*!13'i:1";i::"Tiiroi"'l;u"..
Third Level: A lodge roorn wi.ll reflect the same addition as noted on
the second 1eve1 .
The landscaping will be reestablished as medium height,'shrubs at the base of
the expanded wa1l line and an alpine garden landscaping reaching to the streetedge. The 15t spruce t,ree must be relocated; the owner is requesting thaL it
be moved to the Vail Alpine Garden in Ford Park.
VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
The proposed improvements do not address any specific sub-area infi11. However,
guest accomodations and general lodge operations are improved by these proposed
expansions. These additions address a general policy consj.deration for betterpublic accomodations in CCI as per the goal statements of the Land Use Plan.
PEDESTRIANIZATION
No impact.
VEHICULAR PENETRATION
No increase in traffic is foreseen except for the activity generated by the
added parking space.
STREEISCAPE FRAMEI{ORK
Actual streetrs edge w111 be unchanged. Leading edge of new expansion is
approxinatel,y 2Ot fron curb. Buil-ding face wil"l be softened by nediun
height shrubs.
SIREET ENCLOSIJRE
Enclosure to I'lillow Bridge Road is mininaL. The width from Sitzmark Lodge to
Sommere lodge ls approximately 100 feet. The new addition expands toward
Wi1low Bridge Road by 14 feet.
The mass of the new addition steps back at the second and third levels to
lessen any inpact of the structure.
VIEITS
Very llttl-e effect on views occurs with this addltion. The new structure
1s within an existing roof line wa11 line of the adjacent elevator.
SI'N / SHADB
Shadow from the new addition faLl within the e:iisting buil"ding mass. No
detrimental shadlng occurs as a resuLt of this expansion.
ZONING STJMI.{ARY
DEIiISITT
(25 units per acre)
Allowed dweLling units: L0 du or 20 au
Existing density: 1 du + 35 au = 18.5 du
No change requested /
GRFA: (.80) ..
Al.lowed : 14 ,207 s.f . r'^
Existing: 13,L97 s.f .{ ,Proposedz Z?q<s.t.3?6 t-E;f . (Renainirirg..after addition) = ?01 f
SITE C0VEMGE (.80 of site area)
AlLowed: 14,207 s.f.Existing: 12,535 s.f.Proposed: 238 s.f.
1,434 s.f. (Rernaining after addition)
HEIGHT
@7a
Ttre Urban Design Consideration requiree thatl0f of
be at a height of up to 33t' and,ffi. of the roof area43'. 40%
The helght of the nerr addition is an average of 321
33r to 31. | ).
the roof area
may be 33r to
(sloping fron
PARKING
Mechanical space not covered by parking requirements.
Office space reguires 1 parking space per 250 s.f. Net increase: L space.
I{o increase in number of accomodation units.
Additlon will increase number of parking spaces by 1 stall.
APPLICATION TORM
OR !,IODIFICATIONS IN
o".!, Application
FOR EXTERIOR AITERATIONS
COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCI)
rr/27 /88
I.This procedure is required for alteration of an existing building
which adds or removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor Patio or
replacement of an existing building shal1 be subject to review by
the Planning and Environmental Connission.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NA.l'lE OF APPLICANT Bob Fritch / The Sitzmark Lodse
AD6RESS 183 Gore Creek Drive. Vail. Cotorado PHONE 476 5001
NAME OF APPLICANTIS RXPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS Box 5560. Avon. Colorado - PHONF:949 7074
c.NAME OF OI}IER
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS 183 Gore Creek Drive. Vai1. Colorado PHONE 476 500r
D. "I,OCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS_fffLGore_Creek_Drine-_ Vai .l . Colorado
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Rl ^"k 5-R, V;i 1 ,Vi 1 l agF Fi rsr-
$100.00 PAID
II'IPROVEIIENT SURVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWING PROPERTY'LINES AND LOCATION
OF BUILDING AITD AI{Y IMPROVEMB{TS ON THE LAND.
B.
rEEE.
F.
G.A LIST OF IHE NA.I'{E oF oIINERS oF
suBJEcrI pRopERty and their mailing
ATL PROPERTY ADJACENT TO TTIE
addresses.
Ir. Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following information:
A. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at a scaleof I"'=.20'i a variation of the sheet size or scale may be approvedby the Cornmunity Development Department if justified;
(pri Bob Fritch
HIf,BRIOR ALTERATION FOR CCI
ADJACENT PROPERTY O!ilNERIS
The Sitzmark Lodge
Block 5-A
Vail- V1llage First Filing
,Vail, Colorado
Charles Rosenquiet
231 E. GoBe:Crebk Dr.
Vail, C0
Lodge Properties, Inc.
174 B. Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, Col-onado
Village Ceiler Assoc.
124 Willow Bridge Road
Vail, Colorado
DonaLd Za1e, Pres.
Snmnrer ! s Lodge Assoc.
1445 Ross Ave.
Suite 2600
Dallas, TI 75202
rL/27 /88
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
Connission of the Town of VaiI will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the municipal code of the
2.
Town of vair onffi at 3:oo PM in the Town of vail
Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
A request for an exterior alteration in Commercial core I
in order to remodel the Sitznrark Lodge. 183 Gore Creek
Drive, L.ot A, Block 58, Vail Village Lst Filing.
Applicant: Sitzroark Lodge
A request for a variance to the number of satellite dishes
allowed on one lot in order to locate an additional dish on
the Vail Run property. 1000 North Frontage Road West,
Portion of Lot 10 & Lot 11, Block C, Lionsridge Filing 1.
Applicant: Ciscorp
3. A request for a conditional use permit, a variance for
parking in the front setback and a site coverage variance
in order to construct an addition to the VaiI Mountain
School . Lot l-2, Block 2, Vail Village 12 Filing, 3160
Frontage Road East.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School
4. A request for a conditional use permit in order to
construct an addition and a parking structure to the Vail
Valley Medical Center. Lot F, Vail Viltage 2nd Filing, 181
West Meadow Drive.
Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center
5. A request to amend Special Development District #14,
Doubletree Hotel. 25O South Frontage Road West. Lot 2,
Block 1, Vail Lionshead, 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Vail Holdings, Inc.
The applications and information about the proposals are
available in the zoning administrator's office during regular
office hours for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMT'NITY DEVEIPPMENT DEPARTMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on January 27, 1989.
75 roulh tronhgc ro.d
Yril, coloT.do E16S7
(303) 476-7000
Noveuber 2t, 1984
l1r. Robert FrltchSltznark Lodge
183 East Gore Creek DrlveVal1, Colorado SLG1T
Dear Bob,
Re: Loadlng Zone Sltznark Lodge
once agaln, congratulatlons on vhat shourd be a flne addltlonto the vlllage. Pleaee feel free to call ne vlth any questlonsyou nay have.
Slncere ly,
Ron Phllllps
Tovn Manager
RP: br
r have ^revleved.your request to use the seven loadlng zone spacescest of the sltzmark for sltznark parklng exclus-lvely. The
?re3. you are referrlng to ls Tonn of vail land lntended forloadlng anal short-term publlc parklng. For the Toun to allonyour guests the rtght to uee these ipaces nourd be a grant oispeclal prlvllege. consequently, r in unable to acco-nnodateyour request.
r would llke to -connend you on your plans for the addltion toyour-bullding. rt provldes you -r'rtn leoo square reet or vrraishould be extrenely vtable coinerclar space. itso, as reconnended
Py tne vall vtltage urban Deslgn Gulde -plan, this addltlon wrlllnprove the walklng experlence-for the pededtrlan ln the vrll;;;:
4
Sitzrnarlr
Il,odge
November 19, 1984
Mr. Ron Phillips
Town ivlanager
Town of VailVail, CO 81657
Dear Ron:
As r am sure you are aware, we are in the process of adding commercialspace to the front of the Sitzmark Lodge. This project is part of the
Town master plan, the objective of which was to eliminate parking inthe pedestrian area and to narro\^r the west end of Gore creek Drive togive a better feeling to the pedestrian area.
There are precedents for using some of these spaces for parking otherthan l5-minute loading. The checkpoint gatekeeper was allowed to parkhis car there this summer during the time he was working. The police
arking in general . _This is all
bu=-b-qot roi a 1o{geE-6Fd-Thc--park
Yeat Arcund Besort Lodging
or gues
department, on a number of occasions, has given letters of permission
I?:-:"t-".i1'1- 91:o:ig-!l?l:: -Th: !?ltl"lill t, i' _.h:ir. redevel0pHat +.plans, was given permissi-on to provide almost no parking, thus P4'-allowing them to use their land. to produce a higher income. Sj_nce' r)
lhcw nra a.rrrt<!e frnrn iha rr:r'Lih- 6+Ftr^+,r,^ +lra.r a+i'r'l -*a al.'r ^ +^ a*Y"they are across from the parking structure, they still are able to odY>|,^
provid.e their guests with conn"iient free parkiig in the surnmer. ffi;
space was intend
C-r.."Z/-9./' 4r] ;.n ,)l f,-7N/-l/{/ .1:--"t t*'
v z/t-4/ u' -
r realize that the idea of paying for parking for added commercj-al
commercial space, ED
183 Gore Creek Drive r Vail, Colorado 81657 r (303) 47S5001
r^<./<.-f 1 +^
Mr. Ron PhilJ.ips - November 19, 1984 - page 2
I am asking for this parking on a space-available basis andonly in the summer.
PJ-ease give
serves thediscuss it
Sincerely,
Robert F.
Owner
RFF/hf
this your consideration, keeping in
need of our guests in Vail. I wouldfurther with you at your convenience.
mind what best
be glad to
h'- --//
b
SPACE AVAII,ABLE NEEDED
30
+1.44
31.44
- .53
+12. 33
- 2.L
{1.t4
GRNiIDTATITERED
1979 took 2 spaces away
Added 432 eq ft
Added 6 epaces
BAI,AI{CE
1984 Reducing commerical
space 159 sq ft (ozzies)
Added 3700 sq ft
Take away 7 spaces
Parking credit for 3
roomS
BAI,ANCE
SHORT
-{- Io.Q
11. @
30
+
34
+4
-7
33
8.14
z.(
/''-""--
/.{. s
//,5
\
'./''.-
'.-...
INTER-DEPARTI4ENTAL REVI El,l
PRO,JECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
COI4,|ENTS IIEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE
DATE OF PUBLICE HEARING:
e:);); /*/ /- €a-'."'*"-:J ^'o!'/'*'
Date:
Comments: ez>leZt.t.vq-- lzz'2 eAa 3, {gS -Zz*n2/.2''J4aaa
etu/2reza-1". '-/ a.a:
- , -,/,y-y' z,-<).-/) ---./ .-- --,- ,.a- -trt.z <-, r
*--f --- --: ./ / J :.-
?h,.2)<.7/a.- <f aear?n -vd 7/atu'z:>J z2ii u8 <- ,z 7o 3 -,e-e'4'et"/-
./'-- / ,. -^ t n/,y-y' z--<t zt,coJ -- -L '2a- .*zt>t,4 <-- A, ;)" c,,-z'!--' /o *" t'rt'uae a; i!,. :: f :::;:f- :; 4
pOltfe oepnnfuenf z.J'- / az,"./j Gtt E'ta-*t- /Y€y',&,va{'
(-/
PUBLIC I'J0RKS
Reviewed by:
Corunents:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed byz .rV:sg r/aAe/
Reviewed by:
Comrents:
TotlN ATToRI,IEY
Reviet,led by:
Comrents:
RECREATION DEPART}IENT
Revialed by:
Corments:
Date: ,/A - / 7' a4/
--.-_*-
Date:
Date:
- Z;rnu,d
Date:
oo
2g-
4"1 11,rm{
/\l4 Xtet\ac
,]
b;Nr\a
IA
-0arc0.r,
fl \u"^hoil c.Qx-tl
^--i
.^ !*&
C*,o({
l,*)*"9[
f,
,^t',il
LU/ ./n
/l ./
,/ ( ) 7-t-
drt-
1'1G
1 8' &."l',44
$M L
B'-\:
*-tT^'
["'("rl
, 4l 'n
*,r^Lrv.,d.n\rr \, , Jyn,L fl""*. I c.- (A+"r^ sc^/.
ag&,Jiru, + ;^l-',+L -*--7
;to-tvwyz '^,-rl / 1",,..-,,r
trzthT
,-u;./,/."k /r("
nd/- an
a
J
a/\L^ l-
Arr[ , ,/*- c]rr,+*,rQaL;iA L ry*J vf 2-
rhr4 /- .L.--' I o-b"rL-(I-- l' ,'4
thL ,/,, /rhry
Jy\ \ r fC_-
,,{ , . o,..b/, /"- '.-- d- //r.*/^ "/an*"r,-' /
-t I t
Pl^L o],U -/* "",,.--,*lrcJ /Arr,-,d/ / hr,
uL*L,* *l-'t* ,[,- lAI -
.-*af c..'-rt,. { whwu*
D "*^iJ ,^t^l
+.. b:-r+. /
AonI;Ya*k '\J /;^*-a_.
,1"".- -
J"
dl^ <
poA,^t ,^ou,^^^^\r^hr^
&*
C*\
4{-
T?J
*\ +U- , fr 1{ ,'l[ il. L.L
,t*1 ' ,lt*-o [t o"*- ' *r-tJ- 5 e.rdihrvrl
ptr*
lA z-(- 0 "7y*9
o
t*
^h*+l-t,
o
['.;o{ , ; Qr1 ,f dJl$ 44q,.ttu/m^ dln,x- Ql^-y
Ar^4 u^JU\f ',f ltu+tA /a-,r";*! +6 V^JrrVwL'
F-F'- qtr|'F
Prolect Application
oare Aueust 13. 1984
Project Name: Sitzmark Lodge Commercial Addition
Proiect Descriplien; One story conmercial addition w/ swirnming Fool atoF-
Contact Person and phgns nrane PiFcr 9lQ-7O74
Owner, Address and Phone: Bel, Frirch 1,83 Main co-e Drive Vail . C0
476-sOOr
Architect, Address and Phone: Wheeler Pi / Architecls Box 5560 Avon, C0. 81620
949-7074
-
Legal Description: Lot 5B B lock Filing Vail Villase First Zone CCI
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
-)
oy: \Lra..-w=
Motion by:
Seconded
DISAPPROVAL
Date:
I r Town Planner
r\4\*1
Stafl Approval
Ll57 of ltfiI€Rlnl5
iil:'!li 1)l' f'l(it.iljc't' SITZI4IIBILLODGE _CltMEBgIAt A_D_pJIIpN.__
l,l;(iAl, DIi.(;Cl(lP'flONl l,Ol' 58 UI,OCK l-'l r r rrr!l'I l. liib VaiL Villase First
t)tis;ctr I t"il'r:ll 0p I'RuJlr;t'
l'hc fo! lowing infornation is
llourd bcl'orc a finaI approval
A. BUILDIN(: l'{ TERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other l{all lvlaterials
rcqrrircd for subnittal by thc uppl icant to thc Dcsiln llcviewcarr be givcn:
Type of tilirtcriol Color (Paint numbers:
Ben Moore )
- Gacodeck - - Dk- Grgy
N/A
canoDv- Plaster Match exi stin
Plaster Match existin
-l^lood
' primed Sash #HC135
Rough Cedar Match existine
Canvas Awning. _ Burgundy Red
l,rla l kuay Go rryrf rlet-k) - Charroe 1 -
Helen Fritch ( owner )
476-5001
Botanical Name Cormon Name
Fasc ia
Soffits
Windotrrs
l{indow Trirn
Doors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck
Flues
Flashings
Chinneys
Rails
Trash Englosures
Greenhous e s
Other
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Deslgner:
Phone :
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
Si ze
-
Hdtrr.
SIIRUBS Pnfpnfi I1a --!ga1 .
GROTJND '
covERs
s00
SEED
o
Kinnikinnick (Arctostaphulos uva-ur is \SQUARE F0OTAGE e 2eaL.
SQUARE FOOTAGE
TYPE SQUARE FOOTAGE
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
Automatic drip irriqation to roof planter.
.. i-r f.
TYPE OR METHOD
OF EROSION CONTROL
c. Other Landscape Features (retainlng wa]ls, fences, swlrmlng pools' etc.) Please speclfy.
1 F'l nucr hn-pe hnr,lo'. i ''' g lhe ra*I aL f rent fasGiai
2. Hot tub w-i th surrounding redwood deck.
3. Swimning pool.
4. Conc. b1\ck pavers bordering storefront.
. Si.gnage under separate application.
S..-r",^^^""K _!42_--
---=;1:- =-=-:: -' -':'
) ?-Lk. d-ko
\ i! |:\s) -L.".^Ll.-
L,,&
)Ts -Aq,-o af
J"'^a
) K*r".4 Lr141;n,q => il t/,.".1/ /-
Tnrat/urd' (
4y'""Jd^^U^.5-- La c on{a..^.I*
?"c. "t. l* P.--l J-
,-r.,lL
t (r,.,lr^S\
,
,
4 o,a,,,... ^ fbh
PrJ /"''4 .,e'n-'717V^"\,^\
acu .rer&'k
r/*7 da.
bn^.^ "$-?
,,r/ah^2oI
oo
5\\-r-,^^*.V
^/jzoB,f +9 - l&.6'n--.l
17. (e
-34--
5/+tut
/.s *
S/,+ac-4
.+-<..
fiorr,,^ ?
Jr^.-,^.rn. Ew- <l ./r*"
)
...---.-..---'
t qv,oto
Sitzmark Lodge Commercial Ad di t ion
183 Main Gore Drive
Vail, Colorado
Wheeler Plper / Architec t.s
Box 5560
Avon, Colorado
T0: Design Review Board Applicants for projects in CCI and CCII
FROM: Department of Comrnunity Development
Development proposals in CCI and CCII are revjerved by the Design Review Board
w_ith respect to 0esign considerations as outlined jn the urban-Design Guide.Plan. These Design Considerations address various architectural and landscapefeatures. It is the responsibility of the app'l icant to demonstrate whethertheir proposal is complying with these considerations. The Design Considerationsfor the Village and Lionshead are available upon request. Please feel free tocontact Tom Braun or Kristan Pritz with any questions you may have.
Vai'l Village
'l . Roofs Proposal differ:s frotn guidelines. Design j.s conceived as a deck/
balcony and not as a roof. This concept allows for lodge amenities, lover
massingr and saves lodge rooms on second and third floors.
2. Facades Facade will develop fronr prinrary materials existing in the village;
stucco, wood and brick. Col<.rrs will include existing plus a newr more vibrant
range on the storefront. Fenestration will include glazed wood doors' paned
_ wood windovs, a bay window and use of awning. Entries will have recess.
3. BalCOnieS Upper level plaza wil.l be one big balcony. Rail detail 1ill natch
ex.is ! inB.
4. Oecks and Patios
pl.aza does include
5. Accent Elements
No deck or patio is planned for street leve1 . Upper 1eve1
Lhese features.
Canvas ar,rnins could be considered as an accent.
6.
7.
Landscape Elenents
landscape addition.
Service Service
st reer access.
PLanters at street and plaza 1evel provide adequate
will be by garage level access and supplemented by
Lionshead (dltro)
I . Heights and m'essing
2, Roofs
3. Facades walls/structure
Facades - Transparency
( over )
4.
(Piper left the table to present
I
uest for exterior alterations and f
and to put a new aza wit
commerc't a I space.r
lr, -3- 7/23/84
itiona'l use rmit for the
and
aroen above
remodel
s item
Tom Braun explained the request as Piper showed elevations, site plans and sections.Braun discussed concepts 24,25, and 2o of tne urban Des.ign.gu.iae'plan withrelation to the Sitzmark proposil. He then eipiainea rrow"it iompttea witn-tneurban Design considerations for vail vi'l'lage. p.iper, arihitect hor the project,stated that the staff had asked him to tabie this'item because he had submtlteaa nevr entrance design which was different from that which had been reviewed bythe staff.
P'iper showed photos with.overlays that indicated where the additjon would belocated, and he described.the changei-to tt" entry.- in-ins*e. to the statementin the staff memo concerning viewi"aown-eoie ciiel orivel"ft felt that the clockTower and the Beil Tower lligadv utoircea td tiil;.- aob'r;it"h, owner of theSitmark Lodge, stated that the irnty view at present was the side of a mountain.
Rapso4 would have liked to have seen the edge of the building moved back at the
:lT.l-Ygie the pool was, and indicated this on i a"ining. -piper si.ia tnit-"-lney nao done some studies, and that moving back that much wou.lin,t change theresults, and that they had-atreaay giten up 300 square feet to break up the sideof the building that included the'riopr. He added that they were also two feetrrom-the propeity rine- iioJt-i'rss;;[il u';o;"'Ii"r""iiiil!, ,.y0" chansinsto slass. vie'te fett that this wii-i-iigntricant-imfr;;;;;i to the street, buthg yras somewhat concerned auout itre-vi"il tror-witiil Brru; Road. He fe.tt itmight be better pul led back jt ighiiy. 'rs ' r' ' r' ' L
ll:f: :lg9:r!99 the placement of trees. piper asked to table to 8/13.. The vote was 4 ih favor,none aqainst with piper abffi -""-:':=-
5.uest for rior alteration in Commercial Core II 1n o
un eDu pp rtcant: Sun 9e
Tom Braun stated that he had gone over much of the memo at the site visit, buthe explained the general-prop6sa1. He itated that the staff recommended tablinqthe item until th6re coutb rb i worr"ieision. -frdui e*pi;i;d-;#d-;h;;.;;;;""5 areas of.concern, and he described the areas. He stated that he wanted someinput to give to the owners.
The vote was 3 in favor
The board adjourned at 5:00 pm to a work session on the sunbird.
I
and Envi ronmental Coruni ssionT0: .
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
'Planning
Conmunity Development Department
August 7, 1984
Exterior alteration request to add approximatelyof commercial space and a rooftop pool and plaza
Appl icant: Bob Fritch
BACKGROUND ON THE PROPOSAL
Th'is item was reviewed at.the July 23rd PEC meeting. A discrepancy in the drawingssubmitted for review required that the item be tabled. ltaff recoUUeldgltgn
was for approval of this proposal, although a concern was-a16?JGTTf,;llockage'ffierar this isatlne proposal, but some changes to the roof form would result in an improvedproduct for the cormun'ity. Reaction from the Plann'i ng Comnission was very favora-ble toward this project. Thgre was concern by two of the four conmissionLrsgYgl+ry+€cicsan+xiews. uepulled back to minimize this impact.
REVISED SUBMITTAL
There are a number of changes on
a
Foremost among these is that cantilevered roofitation. 0ther c ges include the,entrance6ut to
the revised drawings that should be noted.
lled back from
s. These modifica-
iance with the Urban Design
previous memol ) The staff's
3600 square feetto the Sitzmark Lodge
expressed concern over the blockage
was al so expressed by some members
Roof Overhanq and Entrance Canop.v
}lhile supporting this project, the staff hasof v'iews by the roof overhang. This concern
23rd meeting.. As proposed. the canoov wi]l extend above the level of the
ng 0n tne dpcktog plaza. The staff would encourage the planning cormissionrailing on tlr! decktog bliza. Th-e stafto look at this element closel.y as we f
gf !E Planning Cormission during the initial review of the project.
to verhanq has lled back ximately 3'-4' on
It was because of the canopy entry that this submittal was tabled from theJuly 23rd. merailing on t
cess'r vecontributes to this reC
Storefront Changes
These minor changes have no effect on our prev'ious reconmendation.
onse
nd.
, Ufin]-,o
'qolze
taff is extremel leased to see this add sal. We wouldstronll acc date splantings. Relative to the planter are the pavers-9ed, the pavers@r.tne-plah'teF as a part of
If the pavers went around the planteF,I anter, -Tt-woul d i denti
could be addressedEne ptanter as aat the DRB level.However, the staff would qncouragq !!g_!-13!!ing Corunission
this project. These two issues
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation on this proposal ig As previously
sitlr -2- 8/7/84
entry w'ill add
as
fy
mentioned, we are concerned that the height
the blockage of views down Gore Creek Drive.
that the canopv not ex
Staff that
to
one
railinq. A desi
-#oT f,ne canoDv as
which wo acn r eve oal is
planter and pavers,sta would encourage tnefirm direction if these items are to be'left to the
. l.lith respect to t
lanning Cormission to prov'ide
discretion of the DRB.
extend around the planterAs mentioned, the staff would like to see the pavers
and the planter be designed to accommodate seating.
An additional condition of approval is that the applicant not remonstrate
against a special improvement district if and when one is formed for this
area.
forl a r
of the canopy
,!'
MEMORANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: CormunityDevelopmentDepartment
DATE: July 19, 1984
SUBJECT: Request for conditional use permit to removethe Sitzmark Lodge to allow ior a commercial
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE
three lodge rooms from
addi tion
This proposal would liminate three existi lod s as a result of acormercial addition uni ts ront 0n uoreuno leve oc the proposed
by PEC.
addition. The space
wi l'l be converted to commercial use
otif approved
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60, the Conunun.ity
approval of the conditional use permit basLd
Consideration of Factors
Devel opment Department recormends
upon the fol Iowing factors:
Relationship and i of the use on development objectives of the Town.
The removal .of any lodge room in CCI. requires approval ofpermit.. This request can be cons.idered'concurrbhtly withalteration request. While the Town does not like t6 seefrom.the Village, we on the other hand,of.thif site, _The removat of the toag6 F66iiliTs
a conditional use
the Sitzmark's exterior'lodge rooms removed
the,p r;".3P(crr'erall impact on tie Town's developmentGJeiT ves being a pos'iti98.
The
raE
Tac
effect of the use on I and ai r distribution of ul ation trans rta 't on.tL utilities. s 0 rks recreation fac s, a other u cti es neeos.
No effect on the above.
Effect traffic with lt'icular reference to conqes ion. automoti andan satety a nvenlence, traffic flow and con ro | , access maneuver-
a ano remova I o snow from the street and parkin areas.
No
Eff
effect on the above.
I
s
character of the area which the proposed use is to bescate and bulk o
I ocated,nc
No effect on the above.
use 'r n re lati on s u rrou uses.
(
This proposal_represents^a definite upgrading_of property, something calledfor. spec'ifically by the Plan. The addition 6t ttrb si^rinming poot wiit-i'iso-con-tribute to the Sitzmark's ability to attract summer and shouider s"aton gr"iii.
The environmental impgg!_tgpq!_f_Sncerning the proposed use, if an environmental
None
Rel ationshi
FI ND I NGS
(
The Cormuni.ty Development Department recommends that the conditional use permitbe approved/denied based on the following findings:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of thisordinance and the purposes of the district in which tt" i.ii. is'rocated.
That the proposed location of the Jse and the conditions under which it would beoperated or maintained woutd not be detrimenta'l to the puutii d;iiil, ;r;;;i;;;welfare or materially injurious to properties or lmprovbmenis in the'viiiriiv.-
That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of thisord i nance .
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff
in the
recommendation on this request is for approval.loss of lod ditio!a1 retail space,
ff is bein
C
t
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Conrnission
Conmunity Development Department
Ju'ly 19, 1984
Exterior alteration request to add approximate'ly 3600 square feet
of cornmercial space and a rooftop pool and plaza at the Sitzmark Lodge
Appl icant: Bob Fritch, , ,r
I. THE PROPOSAL
Proposed is a one-floor conmercial expansion in front of the Sitzmark Lodge.. The comrnercial space would be built over an area now used for 7 surface parking
spaces and wou'ld also necessitate the removal of 3 lodge rooms (see accompanying
memo). Atop the proposed addition would be a pool and plaza area. Modification
to the entrance to the Sitzmark is also an element of this proposal .
r.Z..,..ErD$TTCI} COMPLIANCE I'IITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONEI r - --
/ r, \.., The Cormercial Core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintajn
- G.i*ll.qyq the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of
(r,""+\,1o., lodges and conrnercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian envirorunent.t The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open
r ( r sPace' and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and
- \)svrvrtnrrdctt<\[$s5. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design
f ,,-\r,o,,r- Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that-'1' are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly
clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public green-
ways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities
that distinguish the village.
This proposal is in compliance with the purposes outl'ined for CCI.
III. COMPLIANCE t.lITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN FOR VAIL VILLAGE
This proposal most directly impacts the Guide Plan's Sub-Area #25. Concepts
#24 and #26 are also to be reviewed.
Service/Delivery/Trash zone (screened). Potential for multi-use as a pocket
park.
The existing trash area is enclosed, and the delivery area is fa'i1y unobstrusive.Potential for a pocket park in this area is not great.
tl,
sifrk -2- 7/1s/84
'r(
-')Sub-Area ConcepV#Z5-,,
-
Commercial Expansion--one story to provide active facade to pedestrian street,help reinforce connection of Gore creek Drive to }lillow Bridle Road.
Proposed is indeed a'l story commercial expansion as called out in this concept.The expansion is proposeq !? extend essentiat]v out to the property rine jn-iioplaces creating a new'ly defined street edge al-ong eoie Cieek oi".ivel ni itiled"-in Concept 25, this.proposal will hopefully strengthen the connectjon UetweenGore creek Drive and l,ljllow Bridge Rbad. itrts woita itio-relnto"ce tte-- --
lif*:!lifr lgopll toward crossroads. Estabtishing the network of pedestrian"trails"iisa primary objective of the Urban Design Guide plan for itre Vitiiqe
Sub-Area Concept fQE
Basement delivery corridor (foot), to Gore Creek Plaza Building to be preserved,extended east when possible.
This corridor will not be disturbed with the proposal.
COMPLIANCE l.lITH URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR VAIL VILLAGE
identified as the primary form-giving
the burden of the applicant to-demon-
compl ies with these considerationsalter the character of the neighbor-9 considerations is summarized-below.
The following design considerations arephysical features of the ViIlage. It isstrate that this proposal substantiallyor that the proposal does otheruise nothood. How this proposal relates to the
A. Pedestrianization
Gore creek Drive is a heavily used pedestrian corridor. As mentioned
::ill:I, ^:h:^91i9:. l].1_ elcoulpges the devel opment of un !!"rconlgslceffi , Il I i^.?"3 t9: i l+lElo-;f+s++tF@ i o n
existing pedestrian netwoifrl
l.lhi 1e
entry
road
Gore
i nto
Creek Drive is also usedthe Village, there should
as a delivery area and for vehicularstill^be^@
ano ven t c les.
B.
The commercial.space will result in an increase to service deliveriesat the Sitzmark. However, this increase shoyld not be'ii1t"ffi"*
d
I
ul
i1
s proposal shoicles in the V
thi
veh
g
vo
e
e
8|^ty. 0ve-a11,
ag
reducing the amount of
D.
Gore Creek Drive. A smallt end of the cornme
Street Enclosure
The existing situation at this sitethe mu'l ti-story Lodge promenade and
G. Views
Road onto Gore Creek Drive.' The roofthgt qradual I
Ifrq
cou pul 1 ed back, the 'less ttre
sitrr< 4- t/1s/s4
A broad
gives the
expanse between
Gore Range from Gore
impacted from Gore
wa'l ki ng up l.li 1 1ow
is not good.
the Sitzmark
Dri ve.The more this roof
be on this view.
r
ine
C. Streetscape Framework
Ili,i i;,.,n
The infill of a commercia'l store front will improv€ the "wolling_gxperiErce"1ndslyecontinuitytothepedestrianway.rnis-iiii.ffin_over the area as it is now.-
a sense of be'ing unenc'losed. T[iby creating a more comfortable enclosure for the estri anreet
E. Street Edge
This proposal is un'ique in that the store fr,ont facades are irreoularwl!b.4+ch yarielf (in the form of windows anffiire
same time beinc!g!ggg.!1qr with a 3]-4' fascia iqr6si.much of theaddition wniieffi grve vrsuar interest to the facade,they.do not provide_enough spaci ior functional activity pockets asnentioned by the Guide plan. The canti'levered roof wi'li brso-i;at;these pockets in the shade for much of the day.
F. Bui'ldinq Heisht
T1,."9,js+S-jsstg with respect to the height of this proposal. Hhilelf, w1 il have a flat roof form, the design does not appear incompatiblewith the existing structure.
The pedestrian is afforded a dramat.ic view of theCreek Drive. l.lhile this view is not significantlyCreek Drive, there is an impact to the fedestriin-
gn-r.ne wglr end of the commercial expans.ion. However, this arears proposed to be enclosed with a cantilevered roof form. paverin front of the addition will extcnd ai ]oecr rn rha +-^^* ^-^^^
1s propo-form. Pavers usedrrr rronr or Ene aoo.ltlon Wj ll extend at @ine.
I
impact will
There is also
i nqs al on
The roof overhang would obstruct the
street edge as one rounds the corner
silarl -4- 7/1s/84
1'l
ined by t de Plan.pedestrians' initlaT view of this
onto Gore Creek Drive.
H. Service and Delivery
The-proposal calls for the exist'i ng trash housing to be remodeled with
i-il;gj!=hjglglroof . No other ptans are proposed retat.inq to serviceano oe nvery.
I.Sun/shade
Located on the north side of the street,
-sun or shade alonq Gofe Creek Drive.
th i s proposal_ui1l_not_iueell
V. ZONING CONSIDEMTIONS
3600 sq ft
loss of 7
commercial addition
on-site spaces
I2 additional spaces
7 spaces
'19 total
parking as a
3 'lodge rooms - Z.l spaces
A^conditiona'l g:g permit is required any time a lodge room is removed fromCCI or CCII. _ This proposal witl resutt- in a^loss4i.fulgqfgg_rooms,-ieduiingthe number of units in the sitzmark to 3r. )ee accompanyrng memo for ourrecommendation on the conditional use permit.
This proposal_is in compliance with aIl other zoning considerations. Oneissue that will be addressed is that of parking. T[e applicant has agreedto pay into the parking fund for the net reduction of siaces on site.- Thesenumbers break down as follows:
reduction of required
result of el iminating
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation of this request isw'ill happen on this site that will be a
and the Village, while elim.inating the
are two issues that we feel merit some
16.9 or '17 additional spaces
for approval . We are excited that somethingpositive addition to both the Sitzmarkexisting parking in this area. There
discussion by the PEC.e incl
ny the buitaing's fa ile we arefee'l imprdvements could be made in these
improved product for the corrnunity.
5*rrul\('
0"v\
tl ie r^-lg
u{y
generally supportive of the proposal . weareas that would result overali in in
,'
sitzmarfs- lngrc+
One condition of approval for.the application is that the applicant agree toparticipate in and not remonstrate ilainst a special improvbment aistiiii iiand when one is fonned for this area-and that the conaitionii-uie-permii-ii'
approved.
No construction (improvements) will be allowed in Town of vail right-of-way.
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Conmunity Development Department
Ju'ly '19, 1984
SUBJECT: Request for conditional use permit to remove three lodge rooms from
the Sitzmark Lodge to allow for a commercial addition
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE
This proposal would e'l iminate three
corrnerc'ial addition to the Sitzmark
at ground level and wil1 be blocked
wi'l 1 be converted to commercial use
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section .|8.60, the Corunun'ity
approval of the conditional use permit based
Consideration of Factors
existing lodge rooms as a result of a proposed
Lodge. -The units front on Gore Creek Drjve
off by the proposed addition.. The space
if approved by PEC.
Development Department recommends
upon the fo1 lowing factors:
Relationship and jmpact of the use on development obiectives of the Town.
The removal of any lodge room in CCI requires approval of a conditional use
permit. This request ian be considered concurrently with_the Sitzmark's exterior
hlteration requeit. t,lhile the Town does not like to see lodge rooms removed
from the Villdge, we on the other hand, are encouraging the commercial expansion
of this site. -The removal of the lodge rooms is a necessary evi'l of this proposal
with the overall impact on the Town's development obiectives being a positive
one.
effect of the use on li ht and a distribution of ula 10n
recreation
No effect on the above.
Effect n traffic with particular refe stion, automotive a1d
safety and convenience traffi c contro | , access, maneuver-
removal of snow from t e street and inq areas.
No effect on the above.
rtati on
Effect upon the character of the area in which thg proPosgd use is to Dg'l9calgd'relation to surrou '
No effect on the above.
Qi.rru.r :Z- tttgtaq
Relationship to Vail's Conmunity Action plan
Th'is proposal_represents^a definite upgrading_of. property, someth.ing called
iof. specifically by the Plan. The addition ot tnb swinrnr-'ng pool wiil-itso-con-tribute to the Sitzmark's ability to attract summer and shouider season guests.
The environmental impact report conce
None
FI NDI NGS
The Cormuni.ty Development Department recommends that the conditional use permitbe approved/denied based on the following findings:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of thisordinance and the purposes of the district in which tne iiie.is located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be' operated or maintajned would not be detrimentat to ite pruiii neiiin, i.i.ivl Jl"welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvLments in the'vi.iniiv.-
That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of thisord i nance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
staff recornmendation on this request is for approval. A trade-off is being madein the loss of lodge rooms for adAjtional rethil space,"Oui-staff feels thistrade-off is a positive one for the Villaqe.
? C*rl.,h*J. o'O
Oo^-k^) c\"-
-tp." t( ", Ie,m
ttlttk u{6);4,n, Zni,'fuo
tr--"t/. -/-'an'en#
(u-*-..ut- .l . h7.-
-.\t r ,+ .-,) ct'tl -fS, -f--a
/sh-f_
N""ilv @ /*''t /,J ,La.^ -. ^. <(ru*
dtl '-)
-:-olr*, ^) *f ,,,^.=-fn7 rl 1.-
Jlr-.,.nn/;r. / ,/^t
-/"r,7 4- -J,rr^
+ S- / <-/." /^+ :a -?,"Q--> T"^o^/fl J,r-(- ;4a'{-
5^ -s;-r^--- a/,"+ car.,ct-,-uu/ / l)eJ
4r-- /l
4r;rt* n'U ,wr./." .,r_ .Trr// /*a
/ ,L^1r^, L V-@ Ll rlirrl
oa
+4,r'n ht 'zA ."^--+ ar
tn<- A*r- /-.* h -/ A
4"7
;
z/. 1''*
4--pat,
&b ^r( (-*"J'7
s, - L aak Jt<-- o .-1
//
/ y''+t7<--t{"- ^/ y'
r,r1 7
[L^ 4 v,)e'-)
4t
?'q"-$ A4
/g/ ,fl.-J,^a
B^kig
lg-e, a^ g. dt"+ -
Du**
-t:'
SITZMARK LODGE COMMERCIAL ADDITION
183 Gore Creek Dr i. veVail, Colorado
CONDITIONAL USE /DELETION OF 3 LODGE ROOMS
Effec ts of vehicular traffic on Commercial Core I District.Overall
delet.ing
limit.ed
proposal- reduces theparking from area in
access gate.
amount of vehicular
front of lodge and
traffic by
within
R Reduction of vehicular traffic in Commercial CoreAs per staCement of item rrA
The net change@rease inparking, but at least it is off-street and not inthe 1odge. _ An arrangement for purchase of parking
underground structure will probablv bd necessarv.please explain to me u,hat t'nonesseitial" means.'
off-street
front of
in the
Will someone
vehrcles.
or no effect on this
that this proposal has no positive (or negative )
The loss of three
concei n .
Devel nt of blic spaces for use h estri.ansI must
effec t
con fess
on this consideration.
F Continuanqe of the various c I, residential. and oublic
ick-up and servlce
lcdge rooms has 1i ttl-e
use in CC I, so as to mainiain exlst character of the area.Specific to rhe aefelio ledge rooms; the vitality of
erc
the
short term stays does alter CCof commercj,al area can iustifv
I. We hope tlrat the trade-offthis alteration.
G.trol o uali of const-ruc tion arch i tect ral desien. andlandscaoe desi inCCIsoas t:o nalntain the existing characterof the area.
Please refer Lo
subnitt.al.the Urban Design Considerations j.n Guide plan
F-. Llf fgcls of noisg._ gdor, dust. smoke and other factors on thecnvironment of CC I.
ffin-smoking., frrrthermore: the Sitzmark,sguests are quiet and well-behaved. No chance.
o
+\rt
cry
fi 9 cn,LLaila|
\,|-h
_ 1J.'*"
v
(*t
t.tr,a
,\ \ YY\
{d*kdt @-1
+ ryfh'*,+
2 ^rl'L t,,tl- /l.-t*,ft"k h^
/nA,A) thf,.^-v.<,'^+- /r"l - h-
6-.,k- CU d"-
o
':r"*?"'t"'Q'
\0tY
I| fri7oos- .4 cnr-t\ l*? :/ p"-
//' f-4 -r! tr, fTfr '/'rr ( "n,I ht d- -/J7 ip,.;-d *,,,JJ"Ro.q/
I
Ii --,(\ A | | , , 4
';I f# 'L-+ " '+ ?::, 't
frh ['"^'
%l,t^{ -NAl
rz*g**A t\
\
?i
+^
{+
l-.
a.A At\ dxrt/\M p*^#-,
oo
,w
I.4
'V./(
L,0,4b/,\./ I/,X"1
/
,,p
4"
q 0&,
lY*u'
/l1v
^Qrl r!
,.D
"t
!
o
( - C-rt.? /,- ,(.:
ru.*J*J-.-.- ,-r-.i \> /
€41. tU^^+*
fu* [,^ i'*.
4.,Q nq?q=^l "^-
€^,L*) b
.)
A
\
Planning and Environmental Commission
Ju'ly 23, 1984
'l :00
2:00
2:45
3:00
pm
pm
pm
pm
l.
2.
3.
Site Visits
Work session on A & D Building at the site
work session on vail Athletic club Hotel condominium conversion
Public hearing
Approval of minutes of July 9, l9g4
Request for revisions to the Bonne vue earth-sheltered housing
Ploigc! on.Lots Al,4?, A3 Lionsridge Filing 2 and on tot O,
flogf t,.Lionsridge Filing 4 to red6sign th6 r,oJsing'uniis.'Applicant: Reinforced Earth Company
Request for a setback variance and a concurrent density controlvariance in order to enclose an existing first flooi aici-iieawith-glass on unit 12, Vai'l Rowhouses a[ sOS East Gore Creek Drive.Appl icant: Nel son King
Request for exterior a'l terations and for a conditional use permit forthe-Sitzmark Lodge in order to deverop connerciial space iouitr of thelooge and to put a new plaza with a swimming pool aird rooftop gardenabove the cormercial spice. Applicant: siizriarf lijag;,-- --
Reguest for exterior alteration in commercial core II in, order toremodel the Sunbird Lodge buiding. Applicant: SunUirU Loage
4.
5.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Cormunity Development Department
July'19, 1984
Exterior alteration request to add approximatelyof conmercial space and a rooftop pool and plaza
Appl icant: Bob Fritch, , ,,
3600 square feet
at the Sitzmark Lodge
I. THE PROPOSAL
Proposed is a one-f'loor conrnercia'l expansion in front of the Sitzmark Lodqe.
The conrnercial_space would be built over an area now used for 7 surface pirking
spaces and would also necessitate the removal of 3 lodge rooms (see accompanying
memo). Atop the proposed addition would be a pool and-plaza aria. moAiticaiionto the entrance to the Sitzmark is also an element of this proposal .
II. COMPLIANCE WITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONE
III. COMPLIANCE l.lITH THE RqAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN FOR VAIL VILLAGE
Mt ptopglal most directly impacts the Guide ptan,s Sub-Area #25. Concepts
#24 and #26 are also to be reviewed.
Sub-area Concept #24
service/De]ivery/Trash zone (screened). Potential for multi-use as a pocket
park.
The existing trash area is enclosed, and the delivery area is fa'i1y unobstrusive.Potentlat for a pocket park in this area is not great.
The Cormercial Core I district is jntended to provide sites and to maintainthe unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of
lgd9qs and cormerc'ial establishments ii a predominantly pedestrian environment.
The commercial core I d'istrict is intended to ensure aieiuate light, air, openspace' and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of-buildings induses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Vi'l'lage Urban Design
Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that-are intended to ensure the maintdnance and preservation of'the tightlyc'lustered arrangements of buildings frontinb on pedestrianways and pu-Utic Areen-ways' and to ensure continuation of the buiTding'scale and aichitectural qilalitiesthat distinguish the vi'llage.
This proposal is in compliance with the purposes outlined for CCI
rv.
sifnart< -2- 7/\e/84
Sub-Area Concept #25
Commercial Expansion--one story to provide active facade to pedestrian street,help reinforce connection of Gore creek Drive to willow Bridle Road.
Proposed is indeed a 1 story commercial expansion as called out in this concept.The expansion is proposeq !g extend essentially out to the property tine in-iwoplaces creat!ng a'new1y defined street edge al"ong-eo.. c...k Drive. As statedin Concept 25, this proposal-witI hopefuliy streigthen ine-connect.ion betweenGore creek Drive and willow Bridge Rbad. itris woitu jtio-reinro"c" lne-- --'
lip:9::!tf"" 1oop" toward crossroids. Estab'lishing the network of pedestrian"tralts"irsa primary objective of the Urban Design Guide plan for ihe v.itlage
Sub-Area Concept #26
Basement del ivery corridor (foot), to Gore Creek plaza Buitdr:ng to be preserved,extended east when possible.
This corridor will not be disturbed with the proposal.
COMPTIANCE WITH URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR VAIL VILLAff
identified as -the primary form-giving
the burden of the appl itant to-demoi-
compl ies with these considerationsalter the character of the neighbor-9 considerations is summarized-below.
Gore creek Drive is a heavily used pedestrian corridor. As mentionedearlier, the Guide plan encourages ihe development oi in i'iterconnecteonetwork of pedestrian.ways. Thjg orgoosal shbuld strengthen the connectionbetween Gore Creek Drive-and l,lillow ei^lage noia,-ttrereU!-;ip"ouing ou"existing pedestrian network.
while Gore creek Drive is also used as a delivery area and for vehicularentry into the viilage, there should still be ami,te iJom i"r[ in-ir,"-'-'road to acconrnodate both pedestrians and vehic'l es.
The following design considerations arephysical features of the Village. It isstrate that this proposal subsiantiallyor that the proposal does otherwise nolhood; How this proposai relates to the
A. Pedestrianization
B.Vehicular Penetration
The.commercial. space will result in an increase to service deliveriesat the sitzmark. However, this increase should not be'iigniricant ntencompared.to the amount of deliveries that take ptace-iti-ii-ong eore CreekDrive. The elimination of the 7 surface-parking .pi."t'riii,-to""ver,-- -
reduce vehicular penetration into the viliage ConriJ."ioiv. "oveiiii,'
this proposal shoutd have a positive impact"by ";ar;i;;-i[e amount ofvehicles in the Villaqe.
c.
sitok 4- 7/1s/84
The.existing-planter on the east end of the sitzmark will remain.Aoo]rlona.t ptanter boxes_are p'l anned for the building,s facia alongGore creek Drive. A small pocket of open space will-be createdon the west end of the commercial expahsion. However, this areais proposed to be enclosed with a cairtilevered roof form. pavers usedin front of the addition will extend at least to the front property 1ine.
The infill of a corrnercia'l store front wil'l improve the "wa'l king experience,,and give continuity to the pedestrian way. This is a aramitic irpi6;il;a-over the area as it is now. -
Street Enclosure
The existing situation at this site is not good. A broad expanse betweenthe multi-story Lodge Promenade and the Sitimark gives the pbdestriana sense of being unenc]osed. This expansion wil] -he1p to dbfine theareas.by creating a more comfortable bnclosure for thb pedestriin-una orrngstreet enclosure more in line with the desired 1lZ to I ratio.
Street Edge
This proposal is unique.in,that the store front facades are imegularwith much variety (in the form of windows and entryways), wtrile it itresame.time being tied together with a 3'-4' fascia icrbss much of theaoortron. l.|hi'le the building "jogs" give visual interest to the facade,they.do not provide enough space ior iunctional activity pockets asmentioned by the Guide pTan.' The cantilevered roof wili alio leavethese pockets in the shade for much of the day.
Buildino Height
There is no issue with respectit will have a flat roof fbrm,with the existing structure.
D.
E.
F.
G. Views
to the height of this proposal. l,lhile
the design does not appear incompatible
The pedestrian is afforded a dramatic view of the Gore Range from Gorecreek Drive. l.|hile this view is not significant'ly impactei from Gore-creek Drive, there is an impact to the fedestriin'wuiiiing-up l,|illowRoad onto Gore creek Drive.' The roof oierhang pioj..tr 6ui'tnto tte
Yi:* Ifg! gradually emerges as one foilows a Faltr i.ounding the cornerrrom.u,rilow_Bridge Road onto Gore creek Drive. The more ihis roof linecoulo De pulled back, the 'l ess the inpact w'ill be on this view.
There is also a very pleasing short-range view as one follows this course.Inls vlew rs one of the street edge down Gore creek Drive. The curvi'l inear
lmark -4- 7/1s/84
Gore Creek Drive serve to pulljust as outlined by the Guide plan.
pedestrians' initial view of this
onto Gore Creek Drive.
streetscape fonned by buildings along
the pedestrian further down the road
The roof overhang would obstruct thestreet edge as one rounds the corner
l,ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
3600 sq ft cornrnercial addition
loss of 7 on-site spaces
H. Service and Deljvery
The_proposal calls for the existing trash housing to be remodeled witha s'l ightly higher roof. No other plans are proposed rel ating to serviceand delivery.
I. Sun/shade
Located on the north side of the street, this proposal w'ill not impactsun or shade along Gore Creek Drive.
A^conditional l:g pennit is required any time a lodge room is removed fromccl or ccII._ This proposal will result in a,loss oi 3 looge rooms, reduiingthe number of units in the sitzmark to 3l . see accompanyiig memo for ourrecommendation on the conditional use permit.
This proposal_is in compliance with all other zoning considerations. Oneissue that will be addressed is that of parking. Tie app'licant has agreedto pay into the parking fund for the net reduciion ot siices on site.- Thesenumbers break down as follows:
= 12 additional spaces= 7 spaces
'19 tota'l
reduction of required parking as aresult of eliminating 3 lodge rooms - 2.'l spaces
16.9 or l7 additional spaces
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff reconrnendation 9f th{s request'i s for approval . l,le are excited that somethingwjl1 happen_on this.site that will be a positive addition to both tne Siiimir[-'and the vi1lage, while eliminating the eiisting parking in this area. There'-are two issues that we feel merit some discussioir ly the PEC. these includethe.potential blockage.of views by the roof overhang and the streetedge f;rmrdby the building's fac-ade' |,Jhire we are generalry supportive of the proposar. uefeel imprdvements_could be made in these-areas that irybula result oueiiii-in'in"-improved product for the community.
Sitzmark J- 7l1sl84
One condition of approval for the application is that the applicant agree toparticipate in and not remonstrate ilainst a special improviment distiict if- and when one is fonned for this area-and that ihe conditional use pennit is
approved.
l{o construction (improvements) will be al'lowed in Town of Vail right-of-wqy.
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Planning and Environmental Commission
Conrnunity Development Department
July .|9,'1984
SUBJECT: Request for conditional use permit to remove three iodge rooms from
the Sitzmark Lodge to allow for a commerc'ial addition
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE
This proposal would eliminate three existing'lodge rooms as a result of a proposed
conunei^cib'l addition to the Sitzmark Lodge. -The units front on Gore Creek Drive
at ground level and wil'l be btocked off by the proposed addjtion.-- The space
will be converted to cormercial use if approved by PEC.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community
approval of the conditjonal use permit based
Consideration of Factors
Development Department recormends
upon the fol lowing factors:
Re] ationship and impact of the use on development obiectjves of the Town.
The removal of any lodge room in CCI requires approval of a conditional use
perm'it. This request can be considered concurrently with the Sitzmark's exterior
b'lteration request. l,{hile the Town does not like to see lodge rooms rernoved
from the Village, we on the other hand, are encouragjng the commercial .expansionof this site. -The remova'l of the lodge rooms is a necessary evil of this proposal
with the overall impact on the Town's development obiectives being a posit'ive
0ne.
effect of the use on I i ht and ai r distribution of ion
acil'ities needs
No effect on the above.
Effect n traffi with particular ref to con stion, automqlLlvg and
an satety an convenl ence tra control, access' ma
remova snow from t e street an rkinq areas.
rtation
No effect on the above.
Effect upon the character of the area jn whjch thg progosgd use is to D9.19ca!ed,n relation to surroundinQ uses'
No effect on the above.
s and fecreation facilities' and othertilities. sc
fSitzmarr -2- tlrst}4
Relationship to Vajl's Conrmunity Action plan
This proposal_represents^a definite upgrading_of property, something ca1 ledfor specifically by the Plan. The addition or tnb sirinming poot wiTt-iiio-con-tribute to the Sitzmark's ability to attract summer and sh6uider season greiii.
The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental
None
FI NDINGS
The Conrnuni.ty Development Department recommends that the conditional use permitbe approved/denied based on the following findings:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord withordinance and the purposes of the district in which the
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would beoperated or maintained would not be detrimental to the puoiic h;tiih, ;.i;;i;;;welfare or materially injurious to properties or imp"oufm"nis in the-vlciniiy.-
That the proposed use would comply with each of the
ord i nance .
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
staff recommendation on this request is for approval . A trade-off is being madeln the loss of lodge rooms for adoitional retiit-sfaie, but-statf feels thistrade-off is a positive one for the Villaqe.
the purposes of thissite is located.
applicable provisions of this
... inetnesnrrc cnslr ust
Szre loooa p" Pa<-
a
(Acceptrble) (ttot Acceptrble)
,/
Subdivislon
Lot
Bl ockfiling
l. Submittal ltcms
(A) +tree+af /nao*.r"ct't I uc'x'v
(o) sita Plan(c) utility Plan
(D) Title Report(t) Subdivision Agreement (if
2. tnqineerlnq Requireirents
applicable)
(A) Culvert'Slze
( s ) ori ve$.ay GradF[8-ffiEi.)1nemq
...: .
' ' '':t 'i 3.Source of Utilities
AI
c
0
E
tl cctri c
Gas
Sever
Hater
Teleplrorie
T.V.F
4. Comr'ents:
B< F c,z at a @ S.€, <o <^*z ac P),,eprr.6 Z.at 22.", <o .4can,c 6<q Crg<
, d€rtal4r *1<aat+t Q+eatc ^b.t3 5,4.
I'-f:1 n^- t/ .---,/aox'tttt
@ -9^o',-
Approved:
Di sapproved:
DE|EIn'rnE oflubl i c lforks
8il I Atrdrc:*s
r'.
Srozaocg .
I.This procedure
Conditional Use
The application
Q,"u,,/s14
APPLICATION FORM FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
is required for any project required, to obtain aPermit.
will not be accepted, until all information issubrnitted.
A. NAI,IE OF APPLICANT SITZMARK LODGE
PHONE
B.
c.
APPLICANT I S
Box 5560
REPRESE{TATIVE Wheeler Piper /Ar chi tec t s
Avon, Colorado PHONE 949-7074
(print. or type)Bob FritchNAME OF OWNER
SIGNATURE
E.
F.
DDruSS 183 c"." Cr""t ItiT PIIONE 476-5001
D.I,OCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDMSS
LEGAL DESCRfPTION t"t .n 81""f rifi"g
,.4FEEg5y.{0...IAlD;..-.ir']l,''|':'e"i.',ii''.';'i';.''':'r
, IL .t .,.Lrr ,. ,]'.'.: ',
A list of the name of owners of alr property adjacent to the
subject property.
(0vER)
Condition"t
?
permit page 2
II . Four (4) copies of the following information:
A- A description of the precise nature of the proposed use andits operating characteristics, and *"a"or.s proposed to rnakethe use compatibre with other properties in ihe-ri;Li;y:-
B. A site pran showing proposed development of !!e site, incrudingtopography' building locations, pari<ing, traffic "ii."r"ti"",useable oPen sPace, landscaped aiea, a;a utiritiei-i"a-ar"i".g.features.
c' Preliminary building plans and elevations sufficient to indicatethe dimensions, generit appearancer scdle, and i"i.ii", iian orall buildings.
D' Any additionat material necessary for the review of the applicationas determined by the Zoning earniiistr"i"i.
III. Time requirernents
The Planning and Environmental commission meets on the 2nd and 4thMondays of each month. An application-wittt-ttt" necessary accompanyingmaterial must be submitted four weeks piio, to the date'oi-trr"rneeting.
./
Date of fnlication 5/26/84
APPLICATTON FORM FOR EXTERTON AT,TSRATTOUS
oR l.4oDrFrcATroNs rN coMMERctAt coRE I (ccrl
This procedure is required, for alteration of an existing buildingwhieh adds or removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio orreplacement of an existing building shall be subject to review bythe Planning and Environmental Conunission.
The application wilL not be accepted until all information is submitted,
A. NAME OF APPLICAf.IT Sitznark Lodpe bv Bob Frirch
PHONE 476-5OOL
B. NAI{8 OF APPLICAI.-ITiS REPRESENTATIVE Wheeler piper / Archirects
ADDRESS Box 5560 Avon. C0. 81620 PHONE 949-7074
I.
ADDP€SS
C. NAME 0F Ol,lNER (print or type)Bob Fritch
Vail , C0 81657
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS 183 Gore Creek Drive. Vail. CO. 81657 PHONE 476-500r
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS rB3 Gore Creek Drive. Vail
LEGAL DESCRIPTION nT"ck 58. Vail villffi
lJ-
F.
G.
.-I I tFEE $100. o0 PAID-:l4J-l-'l t r o. 7 ' '( .v v^ . ,/-.-.,
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWING PROPERTY LINES A}ID LOCATION
OF EUILDING AND ANY TMPROVEMENTS ON THE LAND.
A LIST OF THE NAME OF OWNERS OF' AI,L PROPERTY ADJACENT, TO THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY and their rnail ing addresses.
rr. Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following infornation:
A. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at a,scal'e
of I" = 2O'; a variation of the sheet, size or scale may be aPProved
by the Conmunity Development Department if justified;
SITZMARK LODGE
183 Gore CreekVail, CoJ-orado
PROPOSAL
COMMERCIAL ADDITION
Drive
Atop this commercial space would be a new plaza with a swinrni-ng pooJ-and rooftop garden landscaping.
within the scope of this design will be an effort to st.renghten theidentity of the Sitzmark lobby entrance.
The Sitzrnark Lodge proposes to develop approximatof commercial space to the south of the Lxistingis,currently a small pLaza for summer guests andfront of the plaza.
URBAN DESIGN GUIDB PLAN
Development of this commercial frontase roDrive is as described in Sub-Area Conlepr
7 parking
This
spots
feet
area
in
the north side of Gore Creek
#24 and. #25.
URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
PEDESTRIANIZATION
The_proposed project provides two key rinks in pedestrian traffic ofc9 i. The shopping i-nteresr and and acrivity i- strenghten ar rhe endof Gore creek Drive by those people who would approach this area fromthe east.
_ secondly, people who rsould approach iiom wi11ow Bridge Road
now would have a rnore definite statnent of a commercial shopping area.
VEHICLE PENETRATION
while deliveries to the expanded commercial area rnight increase s1ight1y,the overall effect of vehicular traffic will be one of reduction. Autoswould no longer be parking adjacent to Gore creek Drive in front ofthe Sitzmark.
STREETSCAPE FRAMEWORK
The commercial storefront infi11 becomes an activity generator and a11owsthe shopping and walking experience to be more continuous.
STREET ENCTOSUREI suppose the design proposal before you most closely"average facade height rr concept in the fact that Thein conparison to the single 1eve1 structure oppositeof the Sitzmark itself, I believe the single story to
balance to the existing building.
conforms to the
Lodge is multi storyit. Within the design
have a very pleasing
STREET EDGE
The total conrnercial frontage is approximately 64t long and does
require some variation and irregularity to better tie to adjacent
storefronts on Gore Creek Drive and elsewhere in the Village.
The proposed storefront design changes nass and facade at the east
end and also jogs under a canopy overhang in an effort to make this tie.
BUIDING HEIGITT
The height of the structure is basically one story with sone reliefto this singular level by landscaping and building massing at the eastend. The entrance canopy is designed to also provide some break.
VIEhIS
The view that would be in question of change by this project is nore to
the west than towards the Gore Range. While the view to the west isslightly altered, it 1s now probably better franed.
SI]N / SHADE
Occuring on the north side of the street, this structure will not
change existing conditions of sun or shade.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Commericial space will be i-ncreased by approximately 3600 square feet
and j.n doing so, it will be necessary to delete 3 lodge roons. These
rooms would be enclosed to the interior by the proposed expansion.
Accomodation count lrould then be 31 units.
Landscaping is not reduced by this proposal but actually i.ncreased.
Parking is obviously reduced by those spaces that currently exists
in the area of the proposed expansion. No other area of this site
can absorb this loss and the owner would be required to purchase
space fron the Town of Vail.
gnt
HgI
r
,89
E$
Fss
0u
E
0I
.Tg
tU
E
lrlfltrt
SilztnanlrIndge
Lodge Apartment Condominium AssociationAttention: Managing Agent
]-74 E. Gore Creek DriveVail, CO 81657
Gore Creek Condominium AssociationAttention: CharLes Rosenquist
Box 686Vail-, CO 8l-658
Leigh Norgren
85 Meade Lane
Englewood, CO 801L0
, . ', 'fo, f n'L. 45. l^fft'
^
1 1 4 Q o,,-- L1''-'' t)L
'
> ;J | '/'/'vYear Arcund Resort Lodging
18il Gore Cre€k Drivo o Vail, Colorado 81657 . (303) 47F5001 +^
F
*
6r
Flt
Ft
t_..-....
7Pec\(-\a
)
\/s7zt-
r\
C\C-:- 'A/
c,c-r 7(-'\ ' ,-4ta< o,-i ,.+'i4
)
,,.
'\'tc*:
" :3rvo '- B
1W r:t I rl)
1n"" l'
>',v{\v{t \0
\",-* w
\\l
N \'t .1
NLIi
j*\o"f\9o"o' _1\3' --\<"
\t
,,^r\\ [T*L\O
+""r( v W
,_r\-rx$ e/t 'v'd-,
(&T =
t
--d
,tof f"-\'Yl2
J,t/a/41s--ffi-"a1€
NJ - tt'tl
vv,
f..",rF$.lJc
1'lVONVU 'lU3Ae'l
e0n6-9vaeoe cN
Z0Sl8 OC uollJunl Puer9 . 8961 xog
3CurO S3IVS NOIISNnC ONVUg - NOISIAIC ruU:rS:rn. 7{
, Nolrvu*o3 rs|oP snul H
I
4/n -74*Ae
I
'a^!snJlsqoun
^rlpr s! paJp 1:3i?,3;'r;l ;;i".;5:3,5,1"'l;o
1a1cod e sp asn-!llnu JoJ [pllualod .(pauea;rs) auoz
sldacuo3 .92# parv-qns s,upId aprne aql'Bii:lfi?'
lalcod p JoJ [PllualodPaJp qspJl 6urlsrxa aq1
. >1led
qse;1/{.lan 1 ta0/al ! AJaS
loe3uoJ PaJP-qnS
.IlJ roJ pau! llno sasod.rnd eql ql!m acue.r lduroc u1 s1 lesodo.rd s1q1
sa1111enb rpJn?r'l!q3Jp pup a1e:s.6u1p-1lnq aql ,q ,",rillllil."3lr:;jt3lt;;io.l;ll-uaarb cglqnd pue sfemuer.rliapad uo Suliuoir iourpiinq j6-s1ua'raouer.rp bJiarintr
"1:!1 :r1fit!it"iifret!?tlil:li:':it,3::,:5ii:ii:j:1,:n,"Ji;i:,*,9;ruijri,ru ",,.,,,1H'7"iii:,iiiitriilii'!:iii1,iti,n* 3;t"Bi"il:,:t.::iii!ilnl"iii:uli ;ii.;5;l$vry';j.^u'"' ^
uado'Jrp'xr.{6![ alenbape aJnsua o1 papualui sL l:r.ltsip l aJoJ tp!3Jauxo3 aqf \ ^'lueuuoJ!Aua uPlJlsapad fllueuturopard e u! sluauqs! Lqptia 1eL:.riuLgroi pue s56po1 a.,ur'\N JJo aJnrxlru sl! .n!,'1 'eare lerl.rauuoc a6elttn Li"n-.qi "ro-.ri1ce.reqc anurun al.ri r,,-).b-o1r.o -ulp?ulprx 01 pup salls op!^'.rd o1 papua+ut sl 1rr.r1srp I aroS lerc.ra,rriro3 arjj *y')' /
eq 01 os [p eJE gZ# Pue tz#,t11caerp lsou lesodo.rd slql
.III
lN0Z I lUOl lVIlUlt'tWOf ftroor\c,"'apal
.lesodo.rd_sr.rl1 Jo luauela up oslp sr lJeuzlls aql ol af,ueJlua aq1 o?uo!l€r!J!po4 .eaJp
11e1d^pue lood e eq p[no^/r uorllppp iJsod6.rO'aq+ doiV :a;d;u:jf::9y"::: i::) ,suroor-a6io1 g,ro lendubr eql al'trssarau os[p p[no^ pue saoedsDulrJBo espJJns I JoJ pasn r{ou paJp up JaAo 1[!nq aq plnor,r aiedi-lerciauuroo eql'a6po'1 lrp*rzl!s eql Jo ruorJ u! uolsuedxa'iitir;,iili '.ioo13-"ro
e s1 pasodo.r6
abpol lreuzlts aql 1e
1aa1 arenbs 6999
, ' qol rJJ qog :1uec 1 lddyp-zp[d pup lood dollooJ p pup aoeds leLr.rauuof, Jo,(lelerurxo.rdde ppe o1 lsenba.r uogleeJl 1e .ror..ra1x3
tvsodoud lHl .I
:133 egns
: l1v0
: l^l0ul
:01
t86L'6[ flnl
1uau4;eda6 luaudolarag f11unuuo3
uo!sslutrxo3 [e?uauruoJ!Au] pup 6u1uue14
wnoNVUOWS W o
Jo lunoup aql u !3npaJ
'a6p t t!
tn'11praa6 ./t e^Pq p
'.leaJ / aq1 Jo-uotlPu!u!te eql .3^tJ0
ase"jj,i|iii".]JnJ"o,r-=.i]J']iri"ffiT;sa!re^!tap a3!^Jas o1 aiea.rcur up u! +tndi.r 11* aleos',i;;;ifi#-"il;
ffi'jl"l,li:
!qa^
s!q1
A aql ur salJ
oqs lesodo.rd
'8
plnoqs araql .a6pttl1 aql oXu!pasn oslP s! aAUo leaJ] aJog
'U9l19x ueulsapad 6urlsrxauo ;!il;,,j"li,lles G;;"1;jffii.l5;"ili",:;Ij..,;3'1,ffuPtd eprng eq? .Ja![Jpapauorruoru sv .ropr-rrof, uer.rlsapad pasn,flrneaq-i.ri'iiir;';r.:;ti:;;
uo !1Pz r uE rJl sapa6 .V
JplnJrqel Jo] pup pare f;anrlap-e se
pPoJ
f.r?ua
at!qfi
'ilolaq-pazlJptuuns sI suo!?pJaplsuo] 6-roqq61au aql Jo ralcerriqc alf .ra11EsuollEJap!suo3 esaql qlrm salldurcc-loryp^or 1uer11dde aqt Jo uap.rn!-aq1
out ^!b-uuoJ AJpuUd aql sp parJrluapr
aql ol salp[aJ lesodo.rd slql Mot{ .Doou
lou asrmJaq1o saop lesodo.rd aqf 'fpqi
.^o-
-^[[e!?uplsgns lesodo.rd ,lq+ ?.pql alpJls
s ! lI .a6e
1 1 !A aql J:o sa.rnlpart. t po rsfudaJp suollpJaprsuor u6tsap 6uu.loItoj arir
s9VttIA ltvn 'AI
'lesodo.rd aql q+!A peqJnls!p aq ?.ou ttliil JopuJoJ stttl
'paruasard aq o1 6u1p1rns pzprd raer, eJos o1 .110o3;"j3j;:::r'ill^il:; i;3ffi:X;
-'-'M
a6e1111 aq? JoJ ,:l!_9pl.n? u6rsa6 upqrn aq? Jo a^rl3acqo fieur.rd p s!r,,s[!prJ,,ue.trlsapad Jo >lJomlau.aqi 6uiqsitqp+s: ispio.rss6j3 ijemol ,,dool up!J?.sapad,,aql aoroJular_ostE-ptlor^ srqj .peo6 bopl.lg A6Li!M pup e^rr0 raarJ aJoguaamlaq u0!l3auuoo aq1 uaqlEua.rri',tr InJadoq 11rm lesodo.rd's.rq1 ;g) 1aacilo3 uipa?pls sV 'a^!J0 la:i? ?1o?_0uo1e aoia_1aa"r1i-irauis.ap rflneu'.e oriinJr. ,;;rt;o^41 u! au!1 f1;ado,d-:yl o1 1no r[lerllassa puerxa o1 pasodo.ro sr uorsupdxa aq1'ldacuoc slqr ur lno pal[p3 sp uoLs'dpaiJ lpr]Jeuuof, f.ro1s 1e paapur sr pasodord
'peo6 abpl"tg-lo!l!r'r 01 a^rJo IaaJJ aJog Jo uorl'auuof, aJJoJutaJ draq'laaJls uelrlsapad o1 ape5il'anilce'aiLno.rd o1 ,(.rols auo--uofsupdx] letcrau,ro3
-
(ryt/loa)uol palv-qns
u o ! ? pr le uad iE tnqr qa1-
n8/6'L/t -r-?j,,oo
JPau! [!AJn3'as
eu!
J
'na!^ slql uo aq
I JooJ slql eJou aLlI
aql .a^!r0 ra ri'rian e-oile. ri""r"qt
t_l !,{ 13edu! aql ssa I eql .1oeq pa 11nd'a^rJ0 Iffi
[ [pnpP Ptll
f ol. L!l'1aJoS l[oJJ
aJoD utoJJ
dn 6u111en
palcedul
abueg arog
a1q11eduocu1 .leadde ?ou saop u6tsap auraltqfl .tpsodord slqt Jo rqbtaq aqr cii
!4u.uucqJdno JooJ aql .aAlJo )aaJ3 a.log oluo ppou
Ylrljllapal aql ot loedur up st araqt .5ar.rg 1aa;3It11ueo.r11u61s'jou'si marn slqt e[lqfi .a^!J0 leerJeql Jo /qar^ 3llpuleJp p papJoJJp s! uplJliapad aql
srqe ! A
'aJnlonJls 6u11srxa aq? qllil
:1i91_{t91 lpu P a^Pq rrp'r trlJadsa.l q1[,'1 gnsyfTii-s! eJaql
'rl
lqdi5F-EuTmIE .l
'fep aq1 Jo r,1onru JoJ apeqs aq? u! slal3od esaqle^pa[ os[p t-t!^r ]oor paJa^atlluer aqr .uptd aprnS aqt rci pauoriuJil- se s?ar3od f1rn11oe leuorlrunl .ro1 i5eos q6iou5'"i'.n,i,ia ioir op'icaq1'"lli ii["mg:eql#++g+='(sf',"frlua pup sm6puu,r 16 uuoj aqt uil'Ttffiffi^'r'Tn'arr! aJp sapESE-J luo-J, a.ro1s'aqi +eqr ur anbrun s1 iesodo.rd s1q,
abpl leerls .3
1
tg@uPJpps!s!q1.,r(etlue1l1s"o'o.3ll;j}i,ff,;;l53ll',3l3
,,aouEErrdtrtfiJftI,, aq3 a,ro.ldri t1* luoJJ eJols lprrJaurxol p Jo LLlJul at1
ue 1;lsapad
uaanleq asuBdxa
'eu !
6uo1e elre
aq1 saa16
pPoJq v
lJprxzl !s aql
'poo6 1ou s1
uP ulsa eq? roJ aJnso[]ua etqpuoJuror aJou p buTiEdFTdeql auT slql .pasolouaun 6u.req 3o asues p
pue appuauo;6 a6po1 f.ro1s_11tnu aqX
Jo ?il|-Sorttputs v .a^!J0 IaaJJ aJog
al!s str.ll lE uollpnlrs 6urlsixa aq1
alnsoIJuf 1aal15 '0
:"!1:plalxa 11rar@pssfsT5TEd .uuoJ Joor pa.raa51r1uer e q1i
p
ens/61/t _r_ t,,
5rn Jl r)\a't,
1lnsal plnoil ?eq1 spaJP
Jo aAluoddns ftlPrauao
-efa lrrJ+s
'^?.Lunuuof, aql JoJ lcnpo.ld palo.rdrul
asaq1 ut appu eq plnoJ sluauanp.ldru! [aa]
1\
uP u! [IPJAAO
em/ 'tesodoJd aqX
aJaqI
- lJPulzl !s
Du lr4lauos lPql
pn [Ju! as 'Jld aql /tq uolssn3srp
t'-tet!@
N0I 1v0Nlt4t^t033u llvls
auios-?ueu leal a/{ 1pql sanss! o/,11 arpaq1 6ullpulur![a alrqr4.a6e111i aq] pupp aq ll-rA tpqt atls slql uo uaddeq 111ms! lsanbeJ slUl Jo uo!lppuauuoJal JJ.plS
'PaJp sIr.ll u1 6uL>1led 6u11srxa
aq? qloq o? uo!+tppp anllLsodpellJXa aJp ail .1ero;dde ;o;l
sacpds teuor?!ppe l[ Jo 6'9t
saopcls [.2 - sulooJ a6po1 gp se 6u ry.rpd
6u11euru!ta Jo 1[nsaJpaJ!nba.l Jo uo!llnpaJ
sacpds
[P101 6L
sEredST-
IPuo r.l t ppP z I
saf,Pos alrs-uo
uorl!ppP IP!f,rauu.lof,
I Jo ssol
lJ bs 0099
SNOIlVU]OISNOS gNINOZ ,l
asaql .al!s uo saceds Jo uor.?f,npal lau aql ,r;ti;ljt*r;;rlltSrltSil,ti;!.:lpaarEe spll lupl!1dde aq1 :6ur|.red Jo lptll sr passarppp aq [1M tpq? anssrauo 'suorlpJep!suor 6utuoz Jaqlo t r.p r{1t/.r arirer larubi ur 'si -'lesoarjia slqi
- rno .ro3 ouaur 6r.rrrupdur?3op_."i*ttSooi'1,ffi:li3'3il1',iu1*il,';i-:3ffiHi"ili6u.L?lp"j'sruoor-5Bft1a1FssoI p u! 1lnsar 1,11m lesodo.rd s1q1 .II]J Jo IIJllloJ} peloual s! rxooJ a6po1 e aurrl ,fui pe.rrri6i.r ir lLuuad isn 1euo111puol v
tt..,
l.Ai-rsr
t.-
.''.
Fpml*o-mn-ipsodo.rd *u, . rr"riltl[*';3'30iffi
Jaqlo oNqx.r.A palapoual aq 01 6u l snoq qse.r1 6u11s1xe aq1
'aAU0 IaaJJ aJog ol.uo
r{1
d
Jo AerA [P!1!U!,Suertlsapad
ap n9a 1
AJ-
q pau! llno s
appqSTuni .I
.fianr lap DuE'3doJ-Gl6l[TlJq-6lli e
JoJ slle: lesodo;d aq1
JauJof, aql spunoJ
aql llnJlsqo plnor{
AJaAr lao puP af,!AJaS .H
auo sp abpa 1aar1s
DueqJaAo JOOJ aql
ILn
bB/61/L _b_ ,T,,
Jog buolP u!p[!ng JlS
lq6lJ Ire1 Jo u,,lol u! parv\ol[p aq [$A (sluauaaordnrl) uollJnJxsuo3 oN
IllY?9_":' rPuo!1!puor aqlllt{ls !P luauaao.rduriieiop ileiiiil;"il'11;l':i'
. parordde
?pr.ll pup PaJP slql JoJ pauuoJ s! auo uaqA puP
e 3sute6e alpJlsuoual fou pup u! alEdtllupd
uollpl!tddp aql ro1 leaorddp Jo uotl!puor aug
t
b8/Gt/L Qj.,nr,r,,Og
oruozJpd ,rrlu^91 ?11?arrp eq upr sarnpaqrs luarufed 6uluracuoc ,r3?3{;fl60^li'sreaf rnoJ ?'xau. !{r 'rarro pi5up,iri-iuno,iB'odiuri*i'Jgr-ulrr,r-.anp runoup aql Jo9lr' ro ruaufyi tplrrur ue uo-iaieq s! rI :a.rnleudjs Jno,, JoJ pasol3ua arou'tuesslruo'rd P pu!J 111n noi -'islruoraruSJ-alqeuosua.r
e 1uasaid",'r"riloitT;;,[];J I
111n nor sarBd.s jlg{.?ql JoJ se gi,,._-se_::10. .rrurtS;lt;:t,:l3r5j fiit;:juan16 uaaq lMlryrc"'1eicJj,r,,r,m or peua^uoo ajB rpr{r surooJ aopotaqlJ.oParE aJllua aqt parnspau i uaqn t9!11ryp all {o a6e1oo1 arpnbs tptot eqt u!aspa,u.r rr,16rls E sE^{ araqr' .rioleuiialb-rtdi hirieJ-"q ptnoqs sregunu asaqr
t0.61
00'l +sacpds t0.Zl =
aq1 asodord pue Upuzlls eql roJ
sae3 6u1:1;ed lJptxz?ls :eU
051.8e$
96'71 sareds tplol
oiT -
00't - (luauaseq
= 000.t$ 6 saceds 96.71
_ sutooJ a6po1 gu! pauado-ar) saceds g
sTIFAil5
sateds aJEJJns I00t - (aoeds nau) 1aa1 a.renbs 1199
trdilTlFyt-Eiildiuruo-j
uo!tent!s 6u11.red eql Je^o JIH'311,1"i
.qog Jpao
lgglg opPJolo3 .l!PA
e^uo leaJS arog lsPl ggl
a6po1 1.reuz1ggq3lUJ qo8
lucrudop .p llunuuoo lo.clflo
tg6L ,62 Jaqolco
ooozgrl (eoe)
l99tg op3roloc .[B
peor a6e1uo.r; qlnor gZ
lll't0l
a
t"'
lueu,fpd tE!llu\nof 6u!unss\.-
dq:gvr
JauuP ld uri{ol
unPJg .v sEuoql
--*t \ r\y.flalaf,u!S
aAS .laquta1oN .fppuol^l fq alou ailesluoad pau61s pue\l en16--6; ii rcdaxa itnor, I 'seJn6!J esaql ol elqPuaue eJp
'e,rpq 'tEru nei; suollsanb-fup qxln eu lPl 01 eeJJ laal esPald
on1 a6e4
^ n8/62/01
sDpo'l lJpluzl !stltllrj qog
Lt.
s"fauJollp ?lqpuospal 6ugpn1cu1 ruo!13allo3 Jo slso, alqpuoseal .,.p rc;t;iaal6e'1q6noJq s! llns-io-.anp uaqrt/r-plpd Xou s! uoaJaql lsaJalug Jo alouslqt J! pue .f11rn1pur JaXJe .rb .ld .aio;a{ ,ruirfpa- idirjpA pue' 1uau,,iejJo ault Jo uo!suaxx? {r! 91 aa.r6e pue-.1sl1d.rd +o pue iuirirreoubu uo'Jc.iiou'1sa1and 'luaufed JoJ luauruaia.rd aalbm ,trlpJa^as JoaJaq sJasJopua pup sJarpul' oqralou aql.Jo Japtorr aql Jo uolra6'Jqi'ir:i.liilira rn'pallnor Jq'oilsarelu! eqX Jo:":lg_1: anp auroreq 01 alou atoqfi aql asnpr ltpqs alou slqX6ulJn3as luauaa;be ro aJuBJquncirr fue iepiln 11ne1jp'fue'io Jnp uaq, rsaJeru! Joledlcug.rd 1o luauifed ifde aliu ot a.lh[EJ reqr pu' .urnuup;ad luac.lad 91 goalpJ aq? lB tsaralu! MBrp lprls uoareqx 1sa.ra1ir1 panrrr€ pue ieal-urf"ri"eili'Jepuneraq anp parptoap.ro eirp-ua{r,r pred i.r-ii Ji.r;;dl; rpr4t 033u9V sI tI
SIVO
886[ .g Jaqua^oN
uo alqeited pue anp Z9.9816 g Jo aruplpq 6u1u1etua.l eql qt.r,r
alqefed pup anp
alqefed pup anp
alqefed pup anp
lg6[ .g Jaqua^oN
986t .g Jeque^oN uo
986[ 'g Jaqua^oN u0
6u1p11ng 1ed1c1unp
repJo eql o1 fed o1
t9.98/6 $ Jo lueuttelsu! t{|.tnoJ arll
n9'9816 $ Jo ?ueu[tP1su.r. prlql aql
J0 luaullPlsu! puoces-aqlt9'9816 $
t86 I '9 Jaqua^oN uo alqefed pup anp 00.8g// $ Jo luaul lplsu! xsJ.rJ aql
:suoItoJi sp sluauItelsu! flleaf
u1 a1qe,(ed .a3uptpq pledun at.ll uo runuue;ad luat.lad uaX Jo lseJelu! qXlrir
'sJp t to0
'JolJaJ!0 aJupu!l aql
asluo;d I .panlacaJ
ioppJolo] .[!BA le
Jo atlJlo aql lp Llp^ Jo ur{ol aql }o
onlp^ JoJ .alpp Ja?JE sluaultE?su! uI
b86L'62 Jaqotro 0ppJ0[0c r [!pA
r.131!Jl
.Opo'1 1r"r.f
o-Z'-Bs $
.ud 0t:g le pauJnoCpe 6u11aaru aq1
.radld qlln eonpj u! t sem elo^ aql
=W,,,:6!llyl:l!q: fqta,qtr" jonnl ,r r rnnr "ron.qqr
lF5*ffi
uor.lgPuautlotal rJels aqt
af,Ja!d 'uot ssnJs!P JaIJV 'lf,tJ1sr.p luaulanoJdul ue lsuge6e alEJlsuoulal of ioir asruo.rdp[noA aq lpql uor.lrpuof, aql-al!t 10u plp 1up3r. 1dde aq1 .q]l!Jl qog .flasuaurul dlaqptnom saarl appqs pup 1oq f;an spil laaJls aql Jo apls slql lpql xno palurod Jr.rSrj
- 'ue1d-luasatd aql Jo 1,red 1ou spr4 srql lpql pa.reilsup uallpd pup.rllnsJog 01
fe^1 aq1 11e 6ur1ue1d 1nd 01 supLd ppq umoi aq1 jr pa.rapuon arrald .1caco.rd pinora
,fdouec af,upJlua pup peaqJa^o aql aJaqn 6uglejipui soloilo pamoqs ;1caco.rd stqi-.ro4
o
llallqcJp_eql .Jad!d pup .pappp talueld p .laa
aql '6u11aau snolnard aql alu!s lesodo.rd I 01 apPur s
I lJeuz? !
[P !f,Jeuiuof,
a11nd uaaq peq 6ueqranor pauleldxa unpJg mol
: ?uP3 'aoBAs
'0:e apn ato^ ar{I . .6u11aau }xau oqlol atqpl 01 palsp 6ulLlC .uoltnlos p pulJ 01 ulq qllr IJo/,r o1 6urttu,r aq p[no/{
JJels aql lpr{l .palpls uallpd pue.suogldo tpuo!llppe a.roldxa 6ultttO 1eq1 pa1sa66ns
-ladta 'daap ueql raqlpJ april aq o1 pau6isjp'aq plrior a6eje5'Jqr idel.rio reqrpa1sa66ns sp,rr lI 'a6p.lB6 eql u! Jamolq r,rous pup qJuaq uom e 1nd of ielue,ti aq lpr{lpeJaAsup pue'a6ee1 os aq 01 pepaau abp.rp6 aq1 fqm parse spm eH :1run 6ui11er.rpuleu aql ,{o[aq luaul.rpdp up l]otq ptnom flrado.rd aql uo areld.raqlo fue 11a1l aqpalpls'lupr!1dde aq1 '6u![[!0 )tJl0 'af,up!Jp^ e 6ur11a6 1noq1 rr*r palcn.llsrio- aqplnoc a6ere6 aq1 a.raqn 10[ aql uo saceld raqlo lpJa^as arar,r aJaql 1eq1 pa.readde 1rasnPf,aq lsanbar aql Jo tp!uap papuauruosal llprs aql lpr{l pautpldxa ua11e6 ra1a6
6ur t t!0 preqclX :luecr lddy .
dTdTlb-E6'ef,Eb-T'if,nrtsuof, 01 rapJo u! aruptJp^ Irpqtas JpaJt JoilstFbar=i .zL
P UADJP
o qlnos aspds [P JapJo ur e pol lrpulzl!saql roJ lluu asn IPuo!1!puof, P Jo !1PJal IP JorJalxe JoJ lsan 'n
spm elo^ aqf '1 pup 0t sual! atqel ol pepuoles uosdeg pue
lxau aql o1 6u1lqpl pelsanbar 11 pup 0L sual! ro] slue:11ddy
'Jo^PJ u! 0-gpa/olx uenouoq '6u 11aaur
- 'sural! paleleJ apo] aJlJ pup 6u1p1rnq atqpl!1dde 1[p ]o.1uau1;edag luaudolanaofllunuuro3 aqr Jo uollJpJsllps aql 01 'uorlalduroJ-(t.puB .pafcrllsa.r aq o1 pJsodo.rd irtun
6ut11anp t aql pup sllun uolXppoumroclp aq1 jo; suoll3lJ?sa.r asn rsJeuno 6ulssalppe
slueua^oJ.aql u!t111^{ a6en6ue1 aleudo.rddy (g .fem-1o-1q6r.r 11e1 Jo ur,tol oluo aJnlsnJxs
6u11led puno.l6;apun aq1 6u1p.re6al luauai.r6e luauqceoriua aq1 1o 6urp.rocar pue 6u121
r{a[>lcag s!nprI :lupc! tddV
istnuiil-Y 'rl
('LL uaft 6urno11otr 6u1tqp1 roJ uo11ou aa5)
- ap!.lgcl^l uqo0 pup raJlts 'l ,taupou :sluecltddv'pulptlng ral!ts aql sutpluo3 q3!q^,t,bur[!J ls1 a6e1[!i\ [lp,\.g l]o[g. .0[
l!t'i JOAP} u spA elo^au l 'tPAoJddP 10 suo !1r puol
Jad lsenbal eql a^oJddp 01 papuosas ata!A pue pa^ou uos
-l.pul-J (Z 'taloq aql Jo eoo1l do1 aqX uo sllun t aql 01 pa1e1a.r suoiicl.rlsar 6ugsnoq
n8/Et/8 -9- 3ld
'6u1u1e1sqe arJa!d
aql qlllr ouau JJPIS eql
PU 'uo!ssnJs!p euos JaIJV
'tvAoSddvslo tv^ouddv
:Iq papuocss
:^q uolloy\l
aleo
pleog i e!^eu uolseq
:slueururoc
-
euoz '6u! l tcolg go-1 :uo;1d;:cseg 1e6a1
:auoqd puE sssjppv 'lcol!r.lcjv
:auoqd PUB SSaJPPV '.lAu,uo
t/)ouoLld puE uosJod lcPluo9
:uolld!rcsao lcafold
:aureN lgalord
7'?1r,
uoltsc!lddv lcelord
I ,n,,G",Grv rl
I
iL
lI3-:y.-,.-
?7tcK-'
e*P Je'.J-
! rJC)
TI-
U
Best
copy
Available
3?\-:Tt =L-=\/{
71-rvlC
','btt = l''?x
o
-1
,--..€'?
n-taz-
....J*
/---- .'
-.-'
v
1
{J
L
\,\,'il
c
(
\
<'F-rrd.-'ff'
2-5F--i F{i
---.
-d.\t
nQ-C);
,)<
a*- /
1/
1''i;2), "?' ,ot" a(t9" ,,o' ,'t?:W
,!
a
February 9, 1981
T0: Planning and Environmental Commission
FR0M: Department of Cornmunity Development/Peter Patten
RE: EXTERIOR ALTERATION REQUEST FOR THE SITZMARK LODGE BY BOB FRITCH
The Sitzmark Lodge is requesting approval to construct a
passenger e'l evator on the west errd of the building. The
elevator is 20'x 9' in dimension and abcut 39' in height
at the highest point.
A. COI'IPLIANCE I.IITH PURPOSE SECTION
18.24.010 Purpose.
The Commercial Core I District is intended
to prorride sites and to main+,ain the unjque character
of the Va'il Village Cominercial Area, with its mixture of
lodges and con:mercial establishments in a predominantly
pedestrian environment. The Conmerc'ial Core I Djstrict. is interrded to ensure adequare light, air, open space
and other anenities appropriai.e to the permitted typesof buiidings and uses. The District regulations in
accordance with the Vail Villaqe Urban Desiqn Guide Plan
and Design Considerations presiribe site development
standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance a.nd
preservation of the tightiy c'i usiered arrangements of
buildings front'i ng on pedestri an h,ays and public greenways
anci to ensure contii:uation of bui iding scaie and architecturalqualities tirat distinguish the Vi'l1age. (Ord.21, 1930)
Staff feels the proposa'l does conrply vrith the purpose section.
B. COI'IPLIANCE I.IITH VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN AND
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS IIICLUDIiic ]i1E FCLLOI.III.IG :
1. Sub-Area Concepts of Urbrrr Design Guide P'l an
llo sub-area concept of the Plan is related to this
proposa 1 .
2. Urban Desjcin Consideratjons
Perlestri an j zat'ion,
fralnelork, strcci
hei ght, and vi er.rs .
vehjclc penetrat'ion, streetscope
cnclo:;irrc, street edge, building
a
Page 2
With regard to bui'lding height, the staff has determjned
the elevator to be an irchitectural projection under Section
18.58.040 and thus, no height variance will be required.
The Sitzmark Lodge is a legal existing non-conforming
structure with regard to height and the elevator shaft will
not increase this discrepancy
3. Zoning Code Considerations
No zoning code considerations are affected.
4. Architectura'l and Landscape Considerations
These concerns will be addressed when the proiect
goes to Design Review Board. The elevator shaft is
matching existing materials and should b'lend in well
with the building.
C. . RECO}4I'IENDATION
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
with the condition the applicant agrees to participate in
the Vail Vi'llage Improvement District'if and when it is created.
r|:u-+-z-y-ol
Pctcrr--Busically, l*t. clcaning up thc rot rine ]r" the county rcgulationsarc diffcrcttt from tliiTownf s. It will clini-natc the-n-on-conforming use, and lot6 ls still u lcgul sizc.
Aftcr norc discussion, Gerry askcd for a notion. Roger movcd and Duane secondcd thatthc.rcqucst to.rcvi-sc thc cxisting lot line bctrveen lots 5 and 6, lllock 5, BighornSubdivision, sth Addition bc approved. The vote to approve was 6-0, with Dan Corcoranabstrlning.
F.-. -$ rggucst fot an extcti-o-I altcration and modj.fication in Commercial Core I andleigfrf vur sit"t*rffi""Grcck Drivc. Applicant: Bob Fritch.
Petcr went over his nrcno. l{e explainecl that this r,/as reviewed at the Decenbcr 12y31! ;gssion, bricfly, nrentionirrg that jt was a ninor addition, and that the only reasontnat tt }{as beforc the Planning Conunission was because it was an exter-ior alteration,as nrininrum ss it is. Tire staff had revielred it. anrl it had no effect on any of theUrbatr Desigrl Critcris. rcally, as the ncno stated. The question was did it nced ah<light variattce, thc stafl has detcrnincd that it is basically an architecturalproJcetlon and no hcight variance is required. The Sitznark is a 1ega1 existi-ngnon-cottfonning structr.tre r+ith regard to height, and the shaft was ngi going to increasethat di.scrcpancyr so that no hcllht variunce is needed, and staff is rccomrnendingapproval of the projcct.
Duane Piper of lrhecLer-Piper- explained that the height was 3sr and showed drawingsyl:h noT€ explanation. Thc brcik dor.n sqrErre footage to this is: nechanical equipnent
2..98 sg ft., prrblic lobby space increased i.78 sq ft, the hallway is extended to purtrho elevatot on th€ intcrior^space. Upper trvo floors have storage roons, 132 sq ft,so total envclopc sq ft is 603.
Dan Cotcoran-movedo ond Gayllot seconded to grant the request as stated in the memofronthosteff.sulijoctt'otirefoI1ovliergcgn.1itj.o,-,:
- fhe applicmt aglg.:s to i'ru:ticipate in the \rail. Village ..:b4r'ovc:nerrt<i'i.strictj'fen.d',liic;rfo:n'lerlfo:rVaj.1\ij.11age.
The ttote to eppr,ov'e u'as 6-0" rr,itjt Er:"nne pitrreir at,rt"inlrrg.
_{g!_Igg1ij.gg-_tion .in Conunerc.ial Core I fort&e iicd LIon bui.Ltij.u.q, r_o c,onstrGl--uFce;aaltinna-I-
shops at S04 )hst }ridec SrTcct. {rnrl"icanr: Jclif Selby.
Diek $trn: llt'- ehairtnn, snrJ rr+:nbers oi tlre Pl..rlning cor:unission: rhis ii a request
YtT -th: l'::{..PPcedurc. th.lt rios j'ust o.rJopteil by the Planning commj.ssion tasr springtot a }Icll ati<li'tion to t.hc Rcd [,ien. 'Thc Flanning Comnission has had extensivcp$csentatio)'r at thc aoint. rrcctiin.g betlieln the plinning conunission and the Councilerr tlle Dr*oDo-ssl- Pl'oposcd.-i-s clirori:rntely 2,950 sq ft of neb/ connercial spacerehi(tlh h'oui\r bc b1' 5.1$.>rt ce"oli"*"i-ii r:e.r rvould be a bctter conncction in seiberte{a'crc f;or ;lLoilc t,o rEo d:p thc.ne im,.d -}o3r ;rnd brorvse and just make the area a nuchnox\c attt\c .lllr.i pilclts-tnt spo,cc. idlsc'r nocluestecl is 3 seioncl floor dwelling unitsItthQt tti!?\rld cont-nl I nlr:r'rYortinrrtc-xy 5,5$o s"] ft- Thc proposal for resirlentiai spacels -sr'':bstlnticlly'un*lor r.Ic atrXlr}ri'fd Gl-c;s "Lcsiclcntial Floor Arca for thc building.I tlt'rrlrnl tlire tl}1: l tclrrrt :;*\-rs rbccn r,crJ r.Js)+\lsivc to conccrns of <lealing r,iith thc site
co'itrti''r1g qrql vlit'h it :i('w (t\::.1 it jon t,o ti\c :.tn..crf..rxe thxt is ver1, conpatibic r.rit.h r.;hrt ispttolp-.rstr,.\ \:urd{:[ thc t'sril triix rn.qc ll:Jrrh;rr ill'sii.gn ,cuj.tlc plan. ilso,'1he applicalt has
-lrcslPr)n(lc\l \ iilrr tthc sliit:t:"s vric'r*, to (,!rLrI ji,n:1. ,,rvir:h t he nrinor vicrv corriclor of thc Vail
Vjilltiqqq-' ttrlryu'rn illtc-siillrrl tr',iriiqllc rPllorn. In tiiue u:urrnor v.icrv conidor, thcrc can be sornc nrocli-
9r
-rq!{
_--------:--
Sf{z,l;,:r.'ieFe
effi5.jL1e
February 19, l9g1
Mr._ Dick Ryan-r-uwl OF VAILvarr, co 91657
Dear Dick:
This letter is
ii*'iF ]* li;' i:i' *-l ?': :f '
: T
I ; ;;# f ' ;x + ii r ;"; i;:,'I:::.1g. ;;';;il;.::; f:"$$lT"nl.l commissiJi*ii .r,"i,
f"'*t + _.ry:s* ff : I i i f : :: :. i ", F{ii if,* *}l_ :F, liii
i, i.,,
1l::: are crireria. for approvino:i'ff"'i*ol3;ff.::iteria ;;;'"L3 Yariances' rhe erevator
approval. r r..,r"-l-a:'striJt-";;;:i"
oe approved' suppori
i:ffi;jj * *irl*' :i{::i*fryi"F: !:"#i:""'Ifi5
?grns rorced ." :ilJ u". in'''or-i.5ltnt-in time' r know
qrstrict
"horrld"'i?" "-ui""i-;;";
and r feel that r am
ttg I r;ould trr"r^l!- aure-io"si;;.!*' The improvement
and ir """*i."ii:f:;: r'"p"".J';:'";1"':: 3$"3:itli."n.,,
I*y:ytd.hope that.this condition b.orr.ld h^ _^-approval of the sitzmari ;;"-;;;i. b'ouLd be removed from
Sincerely,
44:
Owner
I
O
siitzrnarle
I'odrge
I'ebruary 19, l-98I
Mr. Dick Ryan
TOIIN OF VAILVail, CO 81557
Dear Dick:
This letter is in appeal of the condition of approval-of the elevator shaft for the Sitzmark Building given
by the Planning and EnvironmentaL Conunission in their
meeting of February 9, 1981-. I am appealing the conditionthat [The applicant agrees to participate in the Vai]-
ViJ-lage improvement district if and when formed forvail Village. "
There are criteria for approving variances. The elevatorshaft met those criteria and should be approved. Supportof the improvement district should not be tied to thisapproval. I may very well support the district at thetime it is formed, but at this,point in time, I knownothing of what wiLl be involved, and I feel that I am
being forced to sign a blank check. The improvementdistrict should be able to stand on its own merits,
and I would therefore hope to be abl-e to support it when
and if one is formed.
I would hope that this condition woul-d be removed from
approval of the Sitzmark project.
Sincerely.
,/ZZ_zZ"
RFF/hf
Year Around Resort Lodging
.183 Gore Creek Drive . Vail, Cotorado 8.t 657 o (303) 476-5001
Fritch
Sii gzrynarle
L$etge
F.ebruary 19, 19gl
#5;"iF*,lli"varr, CO S1657
Dear Dick:
This letter is i:;; *i ]l*l*'i:iF#. "fnin;, ! 31! i.ti-on or "pp.?-y1l
tri4*;*'ffi #;;5;**- :Hffi ,'i;,t'., ""
li:ii;i! :;;::'"':, f$, :"5;,*,11,,,":,_i1nc es . rhe e 1 evator
ri" ii:. $":*:ff r'j; i*i5f i:ft It" ii Ti;i "lr
.i;#::i3I^lF i*p.o".ti"ii':='ra and "nu"lu-!: .pprorli] =",rn,
Lo.::"y:i;
--i';:;";"$";:ii'":::::3
"ot r!-iiej*io tnisllfil"Ii';" I^T:I^J":i-;:ii.J#i,'l ifrl,llT,.._it ig i"riia verv w€rr support_ the aisirll. -J. "in'xnothinq "t o,i,*",lj.,fu,t at this point in t-imo r L-^_-lllli"g ot wrrif-il:.'i'." ac this point-in time,-i il""
?::lg. i"'..J"io' JiJi l"or'lXitl""1:'"nd_r ree.f '.fr.i",
u,n
r'ernrns or what wirr ue-in;i;"d:.1*"..: !i*9, r knowiilllr ji,.:f":i" ;*g"- :.1+;i -Jiltrl"urf. rif*,ll::^:.d-istrict
_ "i,o,iia-.'e" 3_ Drank check. 1tu-iiir""Eri.naung I r""rJ"iii;";:.:"*:*to-stand on rts oh/n mcri+c:15 i"#:', :';;:ff;i "i5o:".:';:o";1"'l:
:91"ff f
ii:merits.and if one is iorrn"a.
RFF/hf
when
I^::utu-hope that. rhis condition rapproval. of the sitzmari-;;;;::i. would be removed from
Si ncerely.
ear AroLrnd Besort Lodging
33 Gore Creek Drive o \Colorado BlC57 r (303) 476_500.1
-
February 9, 1981
T0: Planning and Environmental Connjssion
FROM: Department of Community Development/Peter Patten
RE: EXTERIOR ALTERATION REQUEST FOR THE SITZMARK LODGE BY BOB FRITCH
The S'itzmark Lodge is requesting approva'l to construct a
passenger elevator on the west end of the bui'lding. The
e'levator is 20'x f in dimension and about 39'in heightat the highest point.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH PURPOSE SECTION
18.24.010 Purpose.
The Commercia'l Core I District is intendedto provide sites and to maintain the unique characterof the Vail Village Commercial Area, w'ith its mixture of
lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly
pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core I Districtis intended to ensure adequate light, a'i r, open space
and other amenities appropriabe to the perm'itted typesof bui'ldings and uses. The District regulations in
accordance with the Vail Vi'llaqe Urban Desiqn Guide Plan
and Design Considerations presiribe site deielopment
standards that are intended to ensure the ma'i ntenance andpreservation of the tightly clustered amangements of
buildings fronting on pedestrian l^/ays and public Areenwaysand to ensure continuatjon of building scale and architecturalqualities that distinguish the Village. (Ord.21, 1930)
Staff feels the proposal does comply with the purpose section.
B. COI'IPLIANCE WITH VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN ANDffitrm
1. Sub-Area Concepts of Urban Design Guide Plan
No sub-area concept of the Plan is related to this
proposa I .
Pedes tri ani zati on ,
framework, street
height, and viels.
vehicle penetration, streetscope
enclo:rurc, street edge, building
Consi derati ons2.
c.
Page 2
With regard to building height, the staff has determined
the elevator to be an architectural proiection under Section
18.58.040 and thus, no height variance will be required.
The Sitzmark Lodge is a legal exist'ing non-conforming
structure w'i th regard to height and the e'levator shaft wi'l 1
not increase this discrepancy.
3. Zonfng Code Considerations
No zoning code considerations are affected.
4. Architectural and Lands,cape Considerations
These concerns will be addressed when the proiect
goes to Design Review Board. The elevator shaft is
matching ex'ist'i ng materials and should blend in well
with the building.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recommends approval
wjth the condition the applicant agrees to participate in
the Vai'l Village Improvement District if and when it is created.
PBC-4-2-9-81
PGtcr: Basicalty, .t? cleaning up
are differenr from thc Townrs. It will6 ls still a legal size.
After rnore discussion, Gerry asked forthe roqucst to revise the existing lotSubdlvisionr Sth Addition be approved.
abstalnlng.
nelght varj.ance to construct tn eievatorCreek Drive. Applicant: Bob Fritch.
Uest for sn exterior alteration and nodification in Connercial Core and
the lot 1i.ne because the County regulations
eliminate the non-conforming use, and 1ot
a rnotion. Roger noved and Duane seconded thatline between lots 5 and 6, Block 5, Bighorn
The vote to approve was 6-0, with Dan Corcoran
at the Sitzmark b lding located at Gore
Peter went over his neno. He explained t.hat this was reviewed at the December lzr.nlk session briefly-, rnentioning that it was a ninor addition, and that the only reasonthat lt was befsre the*Planning-Cornmisiion was because it was an exterior alteration,as ninitnurn as it is. The staff had reviewed it and it had no effect on any of the
PIP* Design eriteria real1y, as the nemo stated. The question was did it need anelgnE verisRce' the staff has deternined t.hat it is basically an architecturalP"oJeetion and no height variance is required. The sitznark is a legal existingnan-coRforming structure with regard to height, u"J ttt"-irruft was ,,oi going-io j.rr"r""r"that dlscrepancy) so that no treiliri .'.rl*"J is needed, and staff is reconmendingapproval of the project.
Duane Piper of WheererPiper explained that the height was 35r and showed drawingsyl:h noTe exptranation. fhe break dor,m square footage to this is: nechanical equipment2p8 sg ft., publie lobby space increased 178 sq tt,"ir,e-tr"i1way is extended to putthc elevator wl the interior^space. tlpp"" t*o floors have storage roons, 132 sq ft,so total envclope sq ft is eog.
Dan eoricoran-qoved, and Craynor seccnded to grant the request as stated in the nenofusln the staff, srnlijoet ro cho followirq condition;
" The apptricant agrees to p.articipate j.n ,the Vail Villagelrytove*nent, distri.et if and r+he.n f,ol.ned {or Vail Vj.11age.fhe vote to alrprove was G-0" wnth hiatoe Fipdr abstai"ing.
6.A I f-9T qn extcri.or alterati.fte and modification Conunercial Core I for, to construct t iona e rng units an t
fot a rlew add;ltiem to ttre Red x,nd. -The planning couurission has had "*t"n"iuu
o^"'t
Itlese'ntattr"en at the jjoint. rnuet;rrg betmeem the plinning comrnission and the CouncilaP,qht Propo.ser.. Foeposod is opt "*lo*t*ily 2,980 sq ft of new cornnercial spacer+hich rould be by Seaber'c Cnlelb'and uc treell would be a better connection in Seibert
$to: -fa."
pe'opxg to sto tlp the:rtr arnd shonr ana browse and just make the area a muchtmre aetlvc arr'd Elens.urt sPsae- l{,ltso roquested is 3 seiond floor dwelling units&t niQuld cortrttiirtn-apipuruxiiunoieey 5,5.s0 sqt f,t. The proposal for residential spacels rs6stanrtllally w.rder tftrie alltqaaed rfo,uss [iesidential Fltor Area for the building.f tlntnrk dlao aplLicamrt llias lbs!:en v.y o*qnc,nrsive to concerns of dealing r+ith the sitecrmnng \q, vit,h a rro* g*,I!i.t[orn ,co tto st1.*.rro"e that is very conpatible with what isple4resod unldan'tllte Vaii.ll Viililiage llfuhan DDSrigu Guide plan. ilro,-the applicant h""teS4aondCd" inr t.he *t"ftr]i Viio*o trq ,&""Uijqg wrich thc ninor view corridor of the VailYli.Itago U{ban ]D}e$iigD G,\iid,a Fllan- en tfr{e unii:nron vicw corridor, there can be sone modi-
shops at 3.04 Dasr &nn(ge S'creet. Anrnrlicamt: Jeff Selby.
Eiek ba'n: [h' €haiunnmo and rnenbers @c the Planning conrnission: This is a requesgHT 3.::H.tff*,$n-ry: jus,c adrytea uy tr'.-pianning connission tast spring
E
-.-a
,t- ,
^ dcC4lXaasLE O1-!t
Project Application
o^t /2 - 8' ?9
FFrir.bllame:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architecl Address and Phone:
Block FilingLegal Description: Lot
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPBOVAL DISAPPHOVAL
Summary:
r\
department of community developmentbox lfi)
Yail, colorado 81657
(3031 47e5613
July I, 1981
Duane Piper
1973 N. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Co'lorado 81657 RE: DRB Submlttal of 7/ll8l
Sitzmark Elevator Add.
Dear Duane:
At the July l meeting of the Deslgn Review Board, your subm'itta1
for the addition of a 3 station elevator to existing lodge was
approved with the fotlorving stipu'lation: tree to be moved -
replaced aften construction.
Peter Jamaq
Town Planner
PJ:df
tl'-
Project Name:
Project Application
Sltznark Elevator Addltlon
oate 6/L5/8L
Addltlon of 3 statlon elevartor to exlsting lodge.Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone Duane Piper 476-L664
Owner, Address and Phone: Rob Fritch, 475-5OO1
Architecl, Address and Phone:
Wheeler Plper ArchlEects,1973 N. Frontage Rd.
Valll, CO.476-1564
Legal Desqription: Lot 5 -B , Btock Filins V. V. I
Exterlor Alteratlon subrnltted Eo and
, zone CC 1
approved by P.E.C.Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
€: --- /
Summary:
D6te:
\
NAIIE OF PRO.'ECT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BTOCK FILING
DgscRrprro{ oF pRorEcr WaJu* ?.1-Nx(27
lhc following infornation is
Board before a final approval
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Roof
Slding
0ther l{all Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
t{indow Trin
Ibors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chinneys
Trash Encl osures
Greenhous es
Other
B. PLANT MATERIALS
(Vegetat ive, Landscaping
Botanical Nane
required for subnittal by the applicant to the Design Review
can be given:
lYpe of !,laterial Color
l.WA WFrt
Trees, Shrubs, and
Santigr
llaterials including
Comon Narne
@ftW+
Ground Cover)
Size(W d?paery@
ULa) bxV(
tfui,*
2\
C.
a
otilEr ul$tAr! FEAnRES
(letrhlal irllr, Fcncol,
nl/o
ltrirninS Pools, etc.) Plcrlo rpoclfy.
" ' '" -:'--
Tt*-5
PTANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING
February 9, 19Bl 3100 p.n.
STAFF PRESENTPRESENT
Gerry White
Roger Tilkeneier
Dan Corcoran
Scott Edwards
Duane Piper
Jin Morgan
Gaynor Miller
1. Approval of urinutes of neeting of January 12, 198!.
Dick Ryan
Peter Patten
Betsy Rosolack
COIJNCIL REPRESENTATIVE
Bud Benedict
Scott noved and Gaynor seconded that these ninutes by approved. Vote was 7-0 i.n favor.
2. Approval of ninutes of meeting of January 26, 1981..
Dan noved and Roger seconded that these ninutes by approved. Vote was 7-0 in favor.
3. Luke densi"ty control variance, Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn Sub, 3rd Additlon (tabled
from January 26 neeting).
Peter: I was able to meet with lrh. Luke between the last meeting and thi-s one, we went
over and looked at both topographic surveys--the early one and the one that was done,
I believe last year. As far as trying to cotnpare the two surveys to see if there was
a slope change, that was irnpossible to do because the early survey was not adequate
to be able to conpute slope on the site. I did take l,tr. Luke.'s recent survey and re-
analyzed the slope. I did a slope analysis myself and it turned out that lilr. Luke would
be allowed 2 units on the property rather than one. I informed hin of that fact, and'it did not change his wish to get a variance to construct 3 units on the Property. As
nost of you know, we nere able to look at the site today. We took 5 of the planning
conmissioners and Bud Benedict fron the Council out to the site and we did a complete
inspection of the site. As far as the staff reconunendation on this, there is no change.
To repeat, we still'feel strongly that, of course we would allow 2 rurits which is allowed.
llle feel strongly that the best solution in the developnent of this proPerty is to develop
it in accord with the adjacent lot, where there is a buildable area, and finally lrdlike to quickly go through and read off the findings which the Planning and Environnent
Corulission nust nake before granting a variance. Before any variancc is approved, the
three points that the Corrunission nust find arel
l. That thc granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the linitations on other properties classified in the sarne distrj.ct.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or nater.ially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. The the variance is warranted for one or nore of the following reasons:
a. The str rct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical diffilulty or unnecessary physical hardsltip inconsistent
vith the objectives of this title.
PEC-2-2-9-8L
3.b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circunstances or conditions applicable
to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in
the sane zone.
c. The strict or literal inter?retation and enforcement of the specified Tegulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.
The Planning Connission nust nake all of these findings in order to approve the variance,
and, in conclusion, our reconnendation remains as the original neno states, denial .
Gerry: Thank you. Would the applicant like to make sone corurents?
Mr. Luke: Yes, please. Itve been here now three times, and I thought that we had nade
the ninutes of the neetings fairly clear, but I donrt see any addressing of the problem
by the Planning Connission. Itrn going to state it one more titne for the recotd, and
th.itrs it. Low Density lrtultiple Family equals north side of lot 3 equals ).ot 4 ,3.7units. Sarne topography, and I believe you gent l ernen have seen that today, and Irn sorry,
but lrn getting a little bit inpatient because I've been here 3 times and nothing seens
to be happening. If you deny this today I would appreciate under the constitutional
Plocess the reasons why you are denying it. I have and they are part of the ni.nutes
of the meeting and I should not take the time of the group to reiterate for the third
tirne, and I will not. If you would like sone reiteration, I would be happy to present
it to you. Thank you.
Gerry: Ttrank you. Comments fron the Planning Conmission?
Dan: As I recall, the postponetnents and the requests for tabliag were on your part,
not the planning connission. We were nore than willing to take a vote the first t iure
you were here.
Luke: That is not true, sir. In talking to Mr. Patten, we had to narly the original
site plan Process which as you know is the site plan, to the survey which was lilr. R.W.
Consultants, July 1980, marry those two to see if there was a considerable difference.
Now. The rocks have been thrown on ny land by you and the State. How nany of eachI do not know. I told you this three weeks ago. This has not been decided because
there are scar places my trees, there are also no lichen moss, called noss rock. Now,Irll be happy to go into it, Itve into it three tines, and all I get is bottles andbees. Nobody has ever answered one question. Irn a little bit tired.
Dan: You said that the rocks on your property substantially changed the topography,
and thatts why there is a difference. -I lrgued with you and explained to you whyif your lot was surveyed properly, those rocks would not affect your topography. You
obviously didntt listen to that.
Luke: No, you haventt checked it out.
Dan: Oh, yes, I have. Irve been out to your lot 3 tines in the last two weeks walkingit by nyself, and with the Planning Cornmission today. I'n a licensed land surveyorin this state, also. I know what is required on topography.
Luke: Fine. ily point still remains, and I have not changed. -I believe the ninuteswill reflect this and thj.s history, it will be forever j.n perpetuity. Therefore, Iwill rest and I want to know what the appeal procedures are. I have an idea t,hat Irn
being denied my three units.
Gerryl Mr. Luke, you haven't been denied three writs. Any other cgnrDents?
Scott: Ird like to rnove that since the applicant has not satisfied the requircnctrts
PEC -3- 2-9-81
of the ordinance in requesting a variance,
Roger: Second.
that the variance be denied.
lerry: Motion by Scott Edwards, seconded by Roger Tilkemeier. All those in favor.(Al1 voted in favor.). Unanitnous. And I would renind you, Nh. Luke, that you have10 days to appeal to Town Council if you would like to.
Luke: 10 days. Is that for appeal to the Town Council?
Gerry: To the Town Council .
Luke: And then what is the legislative process for the State of Colorado? Is that30 days?
Gerry: I dontt know anything about it.
Luke: I think I have to appeal within 30 days as I recall. you night check that andIrll be back with you in L0 days. Thank you very nuch,
Gerry: No, you would appeal to the Town Council.
Luke: Pardon ne?
Gerry: I said that you would appealdecision of the Planning Corurission.
to the Town Council , if you wish to appeal the
Peter: Mr. Luke, the appeal procedure is for you to submit in writing to the TownManager's office, if you would like to appear bn their agenda if you iould liketo aPPeal this decision. one other thing, the presentation that you nake at theTown council nay not be different than wf,at you have presented heie.
Luke: Is that 10 days fron today?
Peter: Yes.
Luke; Do f appear here I0 days fron today?
Peter: No, you will not, just subnit in writing.
Luke: You donrt know the rules of that? When do I appear?
Peterr - sir, again, you subnit in writing to the Town counciL within l0 days.will schedule you on a regular Town cotmiil neeting. you.will,be inforned.
uest-for a min-or subdivision to rerocate an existing rot rine between lots
They
Gerry: Conments frorn the st,aff?
Peter: Yes' This is-the site nap out in East Vail , Lots 5 and 6 are the ones concerned.!q. B-orge-n is requesting that the existing lot line be abandoned, and that a new lotline be drawn, a very ninor change, and Iilr let hirn exprain thc reasons for it.
Borgen: Irn asking that this conunon corner between lot s and l,ot,6 be moved 12 feetto the east. l{hen this single farnily hone was built on this }ot, it had a detachedgarage'
:'i : " :rii i'ii itc
PEC-4-2-9-81 o
Peter: Basically, this is cleaning up the lot line because the County regulations
are different fron the Townrs. It will eliminate the non-conforming use, and 1ot
6 is still a legal size.
After nore discussion, Gerry asked for a motion. Roger noved and Duane seconded that
the request to revise the existing lot line between lots 5 and 6, Block 5, Bighorn
Subdivision, sth Addition be approved. The vote to approve was 6-0, with Dan Corcoran
abstaining.
5. A request for an exterior alteration and rnodification in Corunercial Core I and
height variance to construct an elevator at the Sitzrnark building located at lB3 Gore
Creek Drive. Applicant: Bob Fritch.
Peter went over his neno. He explained that this was reviewed at the December 12
work session briefly, mentioning that it was a nj.nor addition, and that the only reason
that it was before the Planning Cornrnission was because it was an exterior alteration,
as nininum as it is. The staff had reviewed it and it had no effect on any of the
Urban Design Criteria really, as the memo stated. The question was did it need4
height variance, the staff has deternined that it is basically an architectural
projection and no height variance is required. The Sitzmark is a legal existing
non-conforning structure with regard to height., and the shaft was not going to increase
that discrepancy, so that no height variance is needed, and staff is reconmending
approval of the project.
Duane Piper of l'tlheeler-Piper explained that the height was 35t and showed drawings
with nore explanation. The break down square footage to this is: nechanical equipment
298 sq ft., public lobby space increased 178 sq ft, the hallway is extended to put
the elevator on the interior space. Upper tv/o floors have storage roouts, 132 sq ft,
so total envelope sq ft is 608.
Dan Corcoran moved, and Gayn or seconded to grant the request as stated in the neno
fron the staff.srtrUject to the following coSdition.:
The applicant agrees to participate in the Vail. Village
improvement district if and when forned for Vail Vil1age. : . "
The vote to approve was 6-0, with Duane Piper abstainj-ng.
6. A request for an extgrior alteration alld modi.fication in Gouunercial Core I for
shops at 304 East Bridge Street. Applicant: Jeff Selby.
Dick Ryan: Mr. Chairrnan, and nenrbers of the Planning Corrnission: Ttris is a request
rmder the new procedure that was just adopted by the Planning Conrnission last springfor a new addition to the Red Lion. The Planning Conmission has had extensive
Presentation at the joint meeting between the planning comrnission and the Council
on the proposal. Proposed is approximately 2,980 sq ft of new conmercial space
which would be by Seibert Circle and we feel would be a better connection in Seibert
Circle for people to go up there and shop and browse and just nake the area a much
noie acti_ve and pleasant space. Also requested is 3 second floor dwelling units
that would contain approxirnately 3,580 sq ft. The proposal for residential sPace
is substantially under the allowed Gross Residential Floor Area for the building.
I think the applicant has been very responsive to concerns of dealing with the site
coming up with a new addition to the structure that is very compatible with what is
proposed under the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Pl:rn. Also, the applicant tras'
responded, in the staffrs vi.ew, to dealing with the rninor view corridor of the Vail
Village Urban Design Guide Plan. In the ninor view corridor, there can be sone modi-
PEC-s-2-9-81
fication to this view corridor. I think werve all seen the presentation on the nodi-fication that would take place at the view corridor. I think werve also looked at.
what some of the irnpli.cations are j-f the building is nodified in other ways where
other private views would be blocked substantially if the applicant continued to go
with the Gross Residential Floor Area that is allowed. The staff has looked at the
Urban Design Considerations that the Planning Cornmission needs to review as far as
pedestrianization is concerned. I think it is an irnprovement to pedestrianizationinto the Seibert Circle area. There is a better connection to the Mill Creek Building
noving the Seibert Circle area to the north, which is proposed under the Urban Design
Guide Plan. The Seibert Circle which actually have more sun during certain tirnes of
the year and becone an even more viable place with sone redesign of that particulararea. The vehicle penetration: Potentially there could be fewer vehicles there becausr
there is Presently a 2 car gatage where people come to park at the garage and they also
tend to park at the back of the garage, so at tines there could be 4 vehicles coming
into the core at all times, realizing that they have almost a pernanent parking place'in the Village. Under the proposal, there would be a loading and unloading zone byMill. Creek, so that the people who would be using the condoniniums would be able to
use that area to load and unload their vehicles, and then they would be required, unless
they had sone space that we donrt know about, to go to the parking structure, or if
they had a rental car, they could return the rental car, because they may not need ituntil the end of the week or until they go back to Denver, or wherever they nay be going,
On the east side would also be the loading area, so that the trucks that vrould be servicithis building would be able to use that. The streetscape franework I think wetve alread)
talked about, in fact, we feel that adding commercial shops to that end of the streetwill provide the opportunity for people to actually come up there and walk through
Seibert Circle instead of just, what nany do, look down the street and decide thatit is not worth going dor,rn further to Mill Creek, and I think it will be an iurproved
opportunity plus, from the design viewpoint, it yrill be a very beautiful entry-.intothe shops.
Street edge and stleet enclosure: The applicant has demonstrated that the street enclo-
sure of l/2 to I that is expressed in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan is
lnet by this, and that there is sone street enclosure by the proposal, but I think if
you look at the nodel here today, there is sti11 a very confortab le feeling as you would
walk dotm the street.
Building height: The proposal does neet the Urban Design Guide Plan for building height,
actually the whole building, I believe is under 30 feet which is one of the nain criteriaIt doesntt even have to have the other percentage--3O to 40 feet where a certain percen-
tage could be actually higher.
The view corridor: There is some intrusion into the view corridor taking place fronHilI Street. The staff does feel that that is an acceptable change to the view corridor.
the sun/shade: Ihere is no impact because the sun is coming fron the south and thebuilding is not shading the street or another building.
As far as the zoning code is concerned, the najor aspect there worrld be that the applican
would be required to pay the parking fee that has been established for Vail Villagefor the new addition of residential space and for the ncw addition of the commercial
space that will be in the building, and would be responsible for paying for the rernovalof the parking spaces that are in the present garage. . . :, ,
.'
PEC-6--2/e/81
Under the architectural and landscape controls that are in the Design Considerationsof the Urban Design Guide P1an, I think the applicant, as far as the architecturaldesign, has responded to the essence of what ii U"ing proposed in the Desigx Considera-tions, and actually has the design of the building fit the character of Vail Village,and also fits the building that is currently there. The design, we feel, blends inand is very conplinentary to the existing Red Lion building. The reconmendation ofthe staff is for approval of the request subject to j conditions:
1: The applicant agrees to participate in and remonstrate against .a special inprovenendistrict if and when formed for Vail Village.
The applicant agrees to upgrade the Landscaping along Mill Creek and and presentplan to the Community Developnent department for approval .
3. And the applicant agrees to participate financially in street inprovements, forexanple street Pavers, street lights and the relocated focal point at Seibett Circleif an irnprovement district is not forned, and the applicant will share a sinilar anomtif we are able to get agreernent. fron al I the ptop"riy owners in the surrounding areato agree uPon something like a special assessnent to irnprove Seibert Circle. Iln surethe Town would also be participaling in what inprov"*"ttir would be there.
Gerry: Are there connents fron the applicant?
Peter: We received a letter, I think all of.tire planning cornmission nenbers have acopy of this, dated February 3, 1981, addressed to the Planning and EnvironnentalConnission: Dear Mr. Chairnan and Cornmission nernbers:
rrWith regret I am unabtle to attend your published neeting on February 9, 1981, as Inrst be in Chicago that day. I wish to present to the Corunission, ty way of a 15 minutewalking site visit, opposition by Mrs. Coitlandt Hill and nyself, i.c-t C,riti.r,, to thereguest to modify the exterior of the Red Lion building in Comrnercial Core I. I respect-fully request you al1ow a continuance of your hearing .ttttit I nay present collectivlyor, individually to {ou, ny opposition naterial . 'Your schedule, I- wrderstand, is veryfull, but because of the importance of your decision, I hope you will feel iompelledto hear the property owners who are definitely affecied by^urrj, decision yor r"i". Ian at your convenience Tuesday, February 10th on, for ny presentation. Thank you foryour consideration of ny request.rt
And signed by Jack J. curtin with copies to slifer, caplan, Mrs. Joan Hill, and rne.
Bill Ruoff: I am BilI Ruoff, architect for the project. Before I go into ny presentatioIrd like to say that Dick just stole ny thrmder.- HL said all the things I am irepared!9 t"y. I,could repeat then all and elaborate on any, but I'd like to ask foisomedirection frorn, the planning conmission. Do you want to hear me say it all again and.point to the pictures at the same time, or move on to particularsi Dick gavl a xatherconprehensive point by point explanation.
Dan: Has the Presentation changed any at all, or-substantially from what you gave usat our joint neeting?
Ruoff: Nothing substantive. At that time, when you saw this model 4 weeks ago, there
werenrt any windows on this building, there werenrt any people in the rtt""tr, but the
Red Lion building itself has not beln touched. I can'i iemember, did we have the picture
painted on thc wall?
Dan: If there is sonething really different ,;].a r" did not go over last timc, thatrs
o
2.
the
PEC-7-2l9l8l
rnaybe what we should discuss.
Ruoff: No, there is not. We have come today prepared to show you again the sane pre-
sentation that you saly at the joint meeting at the Athletic Club.
Roger: I think that everybody on our Conmission heard that, and unless there are
people in the audience who cane here particularly for this issue and would like to
hear it again, I dontt think that is necessary.
Peter: Sid just brought up the point that naybe the presentation should be nade in
light that, if an appeal is filed, they will have to nake the sane Presentation to
the Council.
Ruoff: The graphic materials, the
nothing to what was there. If Youidcntify thern for the record.
Peter: That might be a good idea.
Sibldy: I just. want to nake sure that the exhibits rnight
in front of the Council, .as this letter indicates night
at least rnake reference to those specific exhibits that
pictures and the model are identical . We have added
would like, in the interest of saving tine, we could
Larry Eskwith: If he wants to protect the record, I think you should add to what you
think you need. Most of the findings have been made by the Cornrnission, and it has been
found to comply with the relevant ordinances. I dontt know if you are going to have
to go through the entire presentation.
be used at the tine that we axe
happen, I would just as soon
you have up.
Gerry: I would just rnake one corntnent, and that is that the questions that were raised
ancl discussed at that joint neeting should be raised and discussed again right now.
For the record.
Ruoff: Running down the list frorn the Guidelines,. Dick has already done. I can rePeat
that, I can talk briefly about the drawings. We wi1.1. look at the photo overlays that
we have that display the view corridors and how they are affected. I guess what Irn
saying, do you think that it is necessary for ne to repeat substantially what Dick just
went through.
Gerry: No, I donrt. I think it is inportant...
Roger: If you endorse what he said...
Ruoff: I do and have, because...
Gerry: I think it is important to raise the questions that were raised at. that ti-ne.
Roger: I think it was view corridors prirnarily were the things I was concerned with
and relationship of your drawings to the Urban Design Plan, and that has already been
covered .
Jin: Didnrt you have sorne photographs at one point?
Ruoff: Let me run throrrgh the drawings quickly first, and then werll go through the
photographs. This is the base plan. This plan includes all of upper Bridge Street
and crosses'ltlill Creek and takes in Mill Creek Court and the Christi,ana, all of the
surrounding buildings. The red Line supcrirnposed upon the blue plan of the new building
is hcre for rcfcrence to show thc red linc is the existing wall of the Red Lion as you
soo it ip this photogpaph. It does {9t .cornc out to the propcrty line at present. The
PEC-8-2/9/8I o
proposed addition does. These are the 3 elevation drawings which show in considerable
i"tiit the proposed changes. To answer specific points in the Guide Lines for archi-
tectural detail , articulation, pedestrian scale on the street.
Ihe top drawing on this side and the one below it itlustrate the difference between
the stieet enciosure ratio as it exists today with the roof of the Red Lion coming down
very low to only about 7 feet, really above the street. The existing patio there is
actually below itreet 1evel. The driwing irnnediately below shows the same relationship
as it will exist after the addition is nade. The average ratio of width to height is
alnost exactly I/4 to I at present. Under the Guide Lines, this is considered beyond
linits of good conforabl e street enclosure. What werve been able to do is achieve.
l/2 to 1, almost exactly I/2 to I which is considered optinum.
The next drawing is really just an illustration of the height statistics on the building.
The red line shows the height that is allowed under the currently extisting zoning and
Guide Lines. It could be a 3 siory building, as are all of the surrorurding buildings
except one 2 story and one 4 story. the average height of all surrounding buildings
in the neighborhood is 3 stories. Werre proposing, though, for a nunber of reasons,
the Red Lion addition be kept dor!,n to 2 stories. This also keeps GRFA and other things
way under the linit--about 4000 sq ft under the linit on GRFA and a whole story height
under on the height of the building.
The bottour drawing illustrates the principal pedestrian pathways up Bridge Street, in
and out of Bridge Street, and around Seibert Circle as they will exist after the project
is finished. They are not substantially different fron what they are today, but we
feel that the introduction of interest.ing transparent shop fronts from the Red Lion
entrance on around the corner into Hanson Ranch Road toward Mi1l Creek Court building
will draw the pedestrians in a way that they presently do not go. When they come uP,
they fol.low thispathon by Baxter's and The Slope toward the nountain or go over to
Cyranots, but there is nothing to draw them thi-s way. We think we can close the circle
and contain this square, the plaza area. Real1y, we think wetre going to comPlete it.
There are several other drawings that we have here which you saw at the other neeting.
We pinned then up and down, and I think we should do so again today for a very brief
review. They are background information, and rve use them to ansuer questions, if
you'll remenber, on heights, and what. if we did'something else instead of w\at we did.
We spent no time, we didntt even refer to thern rnuch nore than to say that rve had thera
the other time, because they are not of direct interest at this tine. They are the
floor plans of the three floors as they will exist after the addition is made. The
basement which will contain the nite club and contain the noi-se because there !,ronr t
be any windows that will open out below the neighbors, the shops and the new
condoniniums as they will exist on the floor above. Let us just Tun thtough then all.
This, I donrt believe I did show the other tine, because I dontt think we got into it.
We had this one up. The red lines show the outLine of rvhat the 3 story building would
look like. This is an actual rendered elevation of what it would look like. We think
that it is a moot point at this stage, because we dontt really want to go to that height.
Ihese are overlays of the principal elevation of the buildi.ng. There are several
series of dotted lines. They are all a little differcnt frorn the one you see. But
within it, we are able to show the principal alternative nethods of putting the roofs
on this building. The reason we chose the one that you see in the final drawings up
here, is because we feel it is the best comprorni.se on the issue of view planes and
view corridors. lrle feel that the two low gubles that wetve shown there are better than
any of thesc. We bring thcse along, and occaisionally soneone asks, "Well, what if
you aia this instead of that?t', we can shorv on these exactly what would have happerled
if we had done thi.s instead of that and why rvc chose the one that you see in the rnodel .
-l-*..".-'I[
PEC - 9- 2/9/8L
These are sun angle and shadow diagrams which we refered the last tine, because, as
Dick says, they really arenrt gerrnain to our problem because werre fortunate enough
to be on the north side of the street. Werre not casting shadows on :rnyone. These
basically show how the neighbor casts a little bit of shadow on us.
And this is a depiction of the actual view corridor as it exists through HilL Street.
there is a very slight difference between this one and the angles as they are shown
on the official Town nap in the Guide Lines. We discovered when we got out there with
our instrunents and cameras and measurenents and so forth, that. the one on the Town
plan is off by about maybe one degree. It is a very ninor thing. We platted this
one from information which we generated through the project, and it is a little nore
accurate because we had a little nore tine to dig into it. This is an extrenely accurat(
calculated projecti.on of the view corridor.
The principaL exhibits concerning the view corridor, of course, are the pictorial ones.
Ihe large photographs
Thatrs it for now. The overlay done in color to enphasize rather than dininish it,
the impact on the view corridor as it will be viewed fron what we consider is probably
the nost critical point in the entire length of Hi1l. Street which isn?t very nuch.
That critical point, we feel is back here. Itrs actually standing in Jack Curtints
front door, which is right there. The reason we feel this is inportant is because aI1
of the people traversing Wall Street heading toward the nountain or wherever, pass this
way, they can look over their shoulder..is what theytll see as opposed to the people
walking through the street. Only half of them can see it, unless theyrve got eyes onthe back of their heads, so we feel that this is the most inportant one. We do have
also on a smaller scale, a series of photographs showing how it disappears as you walk
forward up Hill Street. they are smaller, we did not pin thern up at the other neeting,
we again, just rnention that they are here as part of the material frorn which these were
enlarged, so that you can see from across the room. The view of the snow capped peaks
of the Gore renains, but what we will cut off is some of the foregrowrd and a big brownhillside above the highway. It actually cones down by the golf course. '
We feel to the visitor and to most people it is the snor capped peaks out there that
are the nost irnportant part of the view. So that is the degree to which we inpinge
upon the ninor view corridor in Hill Street.
We went a little farther than is required strictly under zoning and other regulations.
We did the same kind of study on the two adjoining neighbors upon whon there is impactviews. And that is the two on either side of lli1l Street here on the 2nd floor at the
end of the Plaza Lodge is the apartment of Mrs. JoAnn Hill. Across the street on the
entire 2nd and Srd floors of this building is the residence of Mrs. Cortlandt Hill.
We will have an impact upon the view from JoAnn Hill?s living roon, and we will have
an inpact on the view from Jack Curtinrs apartment. Windows over here and the rest
of her house are not affected. 0.K. This photograph was taken from just inside, 20"
back of the big sliding glass door which is the rnain viewing point frorn JoAnn Hillrsliving room. This is what she sees today. the impact on her view is rather sinilarto what it is in Hill street. Her view now is cut off by the existing chimney of the
Red Lion and the top floors of the Christiana. She sees the peaks across here and
sone of the valley and brown hillside in the foreground. Our new roof line will come
across here and cut off that bottorn piece right in there about like this. It willstill leave the view of the peaks. ilorv let'i look at the sinilar thing as seen fron
Mrs. Cortlandt Hillts house. i{erets the view. The addition will cone out this way.
The piece of view that is cut off here--none of the peaks are inpacted at all. This
end of the roof right here will cut off this piece of, again, the sane sage brush hill-
side opposite the gth tr l0th fairways on thc golf coursc beside the highway. In brief
form, that is the Presentation--the points that we reviewed at the joint meet.ing 3 or
4 weeks ago, the naterial that we showed at that tine.
PEC L0 - 2/9/8L
Gerry: Thank you, Bill. I would just like to make one conment quickly, the same comrenl
that I rrade at the joint rneeting. That is, that I think that you have a rather signifi-
cant impact on the vicw corridor on Hill Street, and that, in terns of the streetscape,
that by moving what would be the southwest corner of your roof
back about 15 feet, it would be nore inviting in terns of taking people around the coraer
which is, aft,er a11, what your design plan is hoping will be achieved, and would have
less of an irnpact in terrns of a confining streetscape which I think is what the inpact
will be. It will be confining in terrns of Bridge Street. It will extend Bridge Street,
up a little bit further than I think it should be. So thatrs ny conunent which is the
sane conrnent I nade before. Does anybody else have conments?
Gaynor: I think I liked it the way it is being proposed in the sense that I think that
they have, on the south end, done enough design work, both on the roof and the indenta-
tions and entTance ways and windows to not create a square building on the end, and
I like the way it is proposed
Scott: If you noved back 15 feet, you would have less than L/2 to 1 ratio, for some
Teason, the nagic number in the Guide Plan.
Gerry: I would just conment that that is a reconrnended nuuiber. Streetscapes and view
corridors are not necessarily deterrnined Uy nffiers, aione.
Roger:'., the view conidor is identified as a secondary view corridor, ip it not?
Gerry: Yes.
Roger: fn our deliberations, I think, in the developnent of the Guide Plan, those were
not considered as prirnary factors to be concerned with. I like the design the way he
has it. It think a very nice job in addressing the problens in trying to mitigate all
of the potential objections, and I think that, based on the allowed GRFA, I thirtk they
exhibit a lot of restraint.
Gerry: Dan, do you have any cornments ?
Dan: I like the presentation. I think it is a nice treatment of the site.
Duane: I do agree that we have obstructed to a certain degree the minor view corridor.I feel in this particular case that the improvement to the more intinate stTeetscape,
the sense of views, and the arrangenents of the buildings out weight the fact that we
do have a slight obstruction there. I do like the addition, and an in favor of it.
Jin: I think the irnpact as being shorrn here is probabty the best picture you can get
of it. As you go down the alley, the impact of the building is considerably nore.
You nove about 10 feet down and you lose the peaks, dontt you?
Ruoff: Jirn, as you walk through now, you begin to lose the view about here. With the
addition, you begin to lose it about here. It dirninishes until we reach this point
in this area, and it's gone. As it is now, it dimj.nishes and you lose it about here.
Gerry: My concern isnrt with seeing the peaks in total per se. I\'ly concern is with
the sense of space. That the whole concept of space, of course, is what nakes Bridge
Street unique. I think that this goes just a little bit further than it should in
terns of enclosing the street. I think that both things can be achieved. I like the
building, and I like the fact that the building is bigger in that particular spot. I
like the fact that. the road is closed, but not that much.
PEC rL- 2/9/8r o
Ruoff: As with nost of these things, Gerry, we end_up cornprising between a lot of
;;;;;*;-"rp""tr, thcre is a conpromise in-shape of Luilding to maintain as much
as possible the view. It;s true, on the ratios in here, we have followed the recommended
guide lines rather closely. It wasnrt difficult because it just happened to work out
that the 2 story scheme here gave it to us. We consciously wanted to create nore of
a sense of enclosure for the Seibert citcie area, and we feel now that with the roof
sloping down, the space isnrt containea-""ty,nuif. But this we have already discussed
bef'ore. There is no doubt it is a conpronise amongst many elenents'
Gerry: Are there any comments from the audience?
Robert Oliver: t"Iy nane is Robert oriver, and I work-for the Plaza Lodge and arso
for the possibility of representing Mrs. Hill. She is concerned about the things that
you are talking about as i". u, the view corridor dovm Hill Stleet, and from the view
fron her aPaltment. These people are trying their best, and she is still concerned
about the lack of vlew corridor that is goi-ng to cone out. of Jrel casenlnl :ii1:*t t"d
also that sliding glass door. Just one iititE ifttt I caught.that you were-saylng' Dick'
I cantt understand why-you can say tittt iit"tl is a Potenaial loss of traffic there'
You canrt take one cond-ominiun and turn it into S and add 5 shop spaces -and not expect
a traffic flow on Bridge street. For someone who has a shop there, or for soneone
who has given their coidonrinium to S1ifer to rent out every week, that traffic is going
to be much greater.
Dick: well, I think there is a potential for being less traffic in the sense that
right now there are a lot of people who come and pirk in those spaces on a continuing
basis of just pulling in and pulling out using th-e core area. with the condominiuns'
at least there is thI potenti"r tttui you would cone in, drop your bags off one^day,
and you may not need to come back until you actually leave the site--instead of coning
in there and saying, nWe1l, I want to go'someplace io- do sorne quick shopping. " You
are probably going io g"t on the shuttle bus iather than walk back to the transportation
"""tlt if ytu-lefi the car there, or if you have turned the car in'
Robert oliver: That might be true, but you canrt add all that space and say that the
traffic is going to go down.
Dick: I guess ny feeling is that itrs not going to. increase dramatically, and there
i, tf," poiential'that it could go down, lusi from- what I see of the use of those spaces
in front of the garage now, whiih u"u "or,rt"tttly being used by everybody in Town to
prri i" and parkl belause ihey know there is a parking sPace there'
Robert Oliver: I think the odds are that it is going to go uP'
Jin: Yes, you would have to expect nore traffic with people having to bring stuff into
shops. wira1 you are saying is ihat there is space theie that people are parking in'
and for some reason, because you are going to eat uP some of that sPace neans that you
are going to have less parking. Sut ihe ictual dernand of, like those 5 shops and 5
cond6s, i ""r, ,"" is going to have more demand that what you have there now, in ternrs
of vehicular traffic.
Dick: I think the potential for shops will be 3 snall shops, probably, because there
are only 3,000 sq ft.
Ruoff: The potential here i.s for 3 shops.
Jinr: Welt, whatever, I nean there ts got to be an increase in vehicular traffic'
don tt see ho* yo. can go from the restaurant and one condo to""
Ruoff: Jin, we donrt feel that there is going to be any substantial increase ig5gurlers
in vehiclcs because these are not food op'erations, we donrt have food and mcat trucks
PEC 12 2/s/8r
th'at have to cone every day to then. They are snall shops that, tend to get shipnents
pretty often, mostly by freight, UPS, or something is delivered to their home because
theyfre using their garage as an extra warehouse. But, aside fron the owner bringing
in their station wagon occasionally to haul sonething that he is storing in his garage,
we see the UPS man parked here sonewhere today anyway, while he goes to 4 or 5 places
here, goes to 2 ski shops, and all the surrounding neighborhood. hlerre not gojrg to brj.nl
the UPS i.n more often. l{e may cause hin to park there an extra 5 minutes while he
runs into these 3 shops and nakes deliveries. But we feel that that is quite different
fron bringing hirn in rnany more tines. We donrt think he will do that. We think that
the existing pattern of the trucks that park along here in front ofCyranorsand Gold
Peak will continue. Some of the point,s that we have discussed before, go a little beyond
this project. We did at the work session discuss a little bit sorne of the things that
will happen when and if the Seibert Circle improvements and irnplemented because they
cornplement what we are doing. That will help to chanelize the traffic so the trucks
then will always park on the sane side of the street, and you wonrt find Burrlettrs truck
clogging the other side, so that if an energency vehicle does come through, he canrt
get through. These r+ill be irnprovements. Again, the cars. We all know the history
of the building. For nany years Marg and Larry Burdick lived there full tine. It was
their rnain hone. They kept 2 cars in the Earage, and they are like all of us. If they
had lots of business around town, and they'd nrn in and out. The nurnb er of vehicular
novernents is what werve concerned with. Now, I didnrt have any reason, and I donrt
think anyone else did, but cornrnon sense, if you think about it a minute, nay Point a
direction. An active couple living here full tj-xne, and the times they bring their cars
out and in every day on the average is 2 or 3 tlnes a day for each car--is going to
exceed the number of car movenents for a condo owner who cones and stays a week, who
cones in and out once. I really think the situation for the condos in the building
is going to be very similar to what we have at the Plaza Lodge today, because your guests
go in and out. Now they wonrt likely stay--who knows? Who knows who is going to buy
those, how long theytre going to use it. Itll te11 you one thing, though, letrs not
go and play the paper nunbers game, but let's be realistic about it. The prices for
which units go in the center of the Village automatically tell us sonething. That they
are going to be bought by people with that uruch noney. People with that much noney
in the cookie jar to slap down on fancy apartnents in the center of the vi1lage,
and then spend about $200,000 to decorate it, are really not interested in having Slifer
stuff it with every corner and run it like a hotel , because that amotlnt of income,
theytre not interested in, and nost of those people donrt want those PeoPle staying
in their place in Vail . They arenrt Tented very often. Theytre given away to friends
and family. Realities of economics and hurnan nature pretty well tell us that, no,
these are not going to have the frequency of use that the smaller condos in other Partsof the connunity do.
Gerry: Thank you, Bill.
Dick: I'd just like to add that there is also going to be a loading area along the
east side of the buildi.ng, too, so that there rviLl be the opPortunity for someone coming
in there to unload their bags and luggage without actually being parked in the street.
Ruoff: And the neighboring points in the Improve Vail plan cotnplenent this beautifully.
Gerry: Are there other conments or questions?
Ed Drager: Irrn here as an interested citi?en. I sat on that same planning commission
up there for 4 years, and for 4 years I and a whole lot of other people worked to get
the Inprove Vail job done to stop developnent as a matter of right in the cornnercial
core of V;iil . It has been accornplished, and I think the dcvelopers here have shown
a gleat deal of sensitivity to the work and the desires and the hopes that we had
and one of the agonizing things that we went through was whcther or not Hill Street
uas a eten::a fiinor view corridor at the tine. I think the rnodifications here on the
PEc rs 2./e/8r a a
Red Lion are going to hurt, naybe shorten up that view corridor, but I think the inprove-
nent overall is a very good improvenent. If I were sitting on that side of the table
today, Itd be voting for it. Thank you.
Gerry: thank you, Ed. Are there any other co ments fron the audience?
Gaynor: Are you going to be required to have parking spaces?
Ruoff: At the end of the Townts recorunendation, is stated the condition
Dick: On page 3 at the bottom of the page, they will be required to pay the appropriate
fee for parking.
Gerry: Irn just going to quickly ask Jeff if he is faniliar with and cornfortable with
the conditions of approval?
Selby: Would you read those to me?
Gerry: 'Sure. Ihe applicant agrees to participate in not remonstTate against a special
improvement district if and when formed for Vail Village. 2. The applicant agrees
to upgrade the landscaping along Mi.1l Creek and present the plan to Commtmity Developmenfor approval . 3. The applicant agrees to participate financj.ally in street inprovenentse.g. street Pavers, street lights and the relocated focal point at Seibert. Circle if
an inprovenent district is not forned. The applicantrs share would be deterni,ned by
the street frontage of property in Seibert Circle and other property ormers in area
would also have to agree to participate.
Selby: On the final one, it would not be of the situation where Ird be the only property
owner in the area. The applicantrs share would be deterrnined by street frontage property
on Seibert Circle of al-l property olmers contributing, is that colrect?
Gerry: Thatts correct.
Selby: I think we can live with al.l those recornrnendations.
Gerry: You are aware that these are conditions for approval , if approved, it would
be approved on those conditions.
Selby: Yes, I understand. Those things may not be known until such tj-ne as inprovernents
are conpleted, but I would assune that those conditions would go beyond the period in
which we inprove the Property. It seems to ne that we nay get down the road here in
a year or 2, and everyone will say, rrletrs upgrade Seibert Circle in that area",, and
we would be requested to corne in at that tine to contribute funds toward those inprovenen'lI have no trouble with that as long as it is an area wide wrderstanding with other
proPerty owners.
.Dan: I uould nove to approve the request for an exterior alteration and rnodificat.ion
in Conmercial Core I for the Red Lion building per the staff neno and as presented today.
Gerry: We have a.rnotion for approval by Dan Corcoran. Is there a second?
Roger: Yes. I second.
Gerry: Second by Roger Tilkeneier. All those in favor? Scott Edwards, Roger Tilkeneier,
Gaynor ltliller, Dan Corcoran, Duano piper, Jim Mcrgan.
And Itnr against because I donrt like that onc :*.ction of that one building.
Motion passcd 6-1.
PLANNING AI.ID ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING
February 9, 1981 3:00 p.rn.
STAFF PRESENTPRESENT
Gerry White
Roger Tilkemeier :
Dan Corcoran
Scott Edwards
Duane Piper
Jin Morgan
Gaynor Miller
1. Approval of ninutes of rneeting of Jinuary 12, 1981 .
Dick Ryan
Peter Patten
Betsy Rosolack
COI,INC IL REPRESENTATIVE
Bud Benedict
Scott moved and Gaynor seconded that these ninutes by approved. Vote was 7-0 in favor.
2. Approval of minutes of neeting of January 26, 798L.
Dan moved and Roger seconded that these ninutes by approved. Vote was 7-0 in favor.
3. Luke density control variance, Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn Sub, 3rd Addit.ion (tabled
Peter: I was able to neet with l4r. Luke between the last neeting and this one, we went
over and looked at both topographic surveys--the early one and the one that was done,I believe last year. As far as trying to conpare the two surveys to see if there was
a slope change, that was inpossible to do because. the early survey was not adequate
to be able to compute slope on the site. I did take Mr. Lukets recent survey and re-
analyzed the slope. I did a slope analysis rnysel$ and it turned out that Mr. Luke would
be allowed 2 units on the property rather than one. I inforrned him of that fact, and'it did not change his wish to get a variance to construct 3 tmits on the property. As
most of you know, we were able to look at the site today. llle took 5 of the planning
coumissj.oners and Bud Benedict from the Council out to the site and we did a complete
inspection of the site. As far as the staff reconmendation on this, there is no change.
To repeat, we still feel strongly that, of course we would allow 2 rurits which is allowed.
llle feel strongly that the best solution in the developrnent of this property is to developit in accord with the adjacent lot, where there is a buildable area, and finally Irdlike to quickly go through and read off the findings which the Planning and Envirorunenti
Connission nust nake before granting a variance. Before any variance is approved, the
three points that the Conunission rnuit find are:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the lirnitations on other properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrirnental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or naterially injurious to propert,ies or inprovenents jn the vicinity.
3. The the variance is warranted for one or nore of the following reasons:
a. The str'ct or literal interpretation an.-1 enforcement of the specified regulation
would rcsult in practical diffilulty or unncJcssary physical hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of this title.
PEC-2-2-9-8L
5.b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicableto the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties inthe same zone.
c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.
The Planning Corunission must make a1l of these findings in order to approve the variance,
and, in conclusion, our recomtnendation renains as the original meno states, denial .
Gerry: Thank you. Would the applicant like to nake sone conments?
Mr. Luke: Yes, please, Irve been here nol three tines, and I thought that we had rnade
the ninutes of the neetings fairly clear, but I donrt see any addressing of the problen
by the Planning Conrmission. I trn going to state it one more time for the record, andthat's it. Low Density Multiple Farnily equals north side of 1ot 5 equals lot 4 , 3.7units. Same topography, and I believe you gentlenen have seen that today, and Itrn souy,but Itrn getting a little bit impatient because Itve been here 3 times and nothi.ng seensto be happening. If you deny this today I would appreciate wrder the constitutional
Process the reasons why you are denying it. I have and they are part of the ninutesof the tneeting and I should not take the tinre of the group to reiterate for the thirdtine, and I will not. If you would like sone reiteration, I would be happy to presentit to you. Thank you.
Gerry: Thank you. Comrnents frorn the Planning.Ccnunission?
Dan: As I recall, the postponements and the requests for tabling were on your part,
not the planning corunj.ssion. We were rnore than willing to take a vote the first tineyou were here.
Luke: That. is not true, sir. In talking to Mr. Patten, we had to narry the originalsite plan Process which as you know is the site plan, to the survey which was Mr. R.W.
Consultants, July 1980, narry those two to see if there was a considerable difference.Now. The rocks have been thrown on ny land by you ancl the State. How urany of eachI do not know. I told you this three weeks ago. This has not been decided because
!lt9le- ar.e scar places my trees, there are also no lichen moss, called noss rock. Now,Ir11 be happy to go into it, Irve into it three tines, and ali I get is bottles andbees. Nobody has ever answered one question. Itn a little bit tired.
Dan: You said that the rocks on your property substantially changed the topography,and thatrs why there is a difference. -r irgula wirh you ani expliined to y-ou-whyif your lot was surveyed properly, those rocks would not affect your topogiaphy. you
obviously didn't listen to that.
Luke: No, you havenrt checked it out.
Diri: 0h, yes, I have. Irve been out to your lot 3 tirnes in the last trvo weeks walkingit by myself, and with the Planning Commission today. Irn a licensed land surveyorin this state, also. I know what is required on topography.
tYIg' lin". lly Point still remains, and r have not changed. -r.believe the rninuteswill reflect this and this history, it wirr be forever in perpetuity. Therefore, Iwill rest and I want to know what the appeal procedures are. I have an idea that lrnbeing denied my three units.
Gerry: Mr. Luke, you havenrt been denied three i;ilits.
Scott: Itd like to tnove that since the applicarii- has
Any other conments ?
not satisfied the requiremcnts
PEC -3- 2-9-81
of itre ordinance in requesting a variance, that the variance be denied.
Roger: Second.
99Tyt Motion by Scott Edwards, seconded by Roger Til,kemeier. All those in favor.(All voted in favor.). unanirnous. And I w-ould renind you, l,tr. Luke, that yo,r--h"uul0 days to appeal to Town Council if you would like to.
Luke: l0 days. Is that for appeal to the Town Council?
Gerry: To the Toun Council.
Luke: fuid then what is the legislative process for the State of Colorado? Is that30 days?
Gerry: I donrt know anything about it.
Luke: I think I have to appeal within S0 days as I recall.Irll be back with you in 10 days. Thank you very uruch.
Gerryl No, you would appeal to the Town Council .
Luke: Pardon rne?
Gerry: I said that you would appealdecision of the Planning Conurisiion.
You night check that and
to the Town Council, if you wish to appeal the
Peter: Mr. Luke, the appeal procedure is for you to subnit in writing to the TownManagerrs office, if you woutd like to appear bn their agenda if you iould liket-o appeal this decision. one other thing, the presentation that you make at theTown council tnay not be different than wfiat you'nave pr"ient;a-he;;. .. - -- --'-
Luke: Is that l0 days from today?
Peter: Yes.
appear here 10 days frorn today?
No, you will not, just submi.t in writing.
donrt know the rules of that?' When do I appear?
again, you subrnit in witing: to the Torm council with'iir 10 days. Theyrou on a regular Town cormcil neetin!. you.wirr,.be inforned.
fol a min_or.:qbdivision to relocate an existing lot line between lots
orn Borqen.
3:a"I:r_rl:t:_ 1i-: i:.the site rnap out in East Vail, lots 5 and 6 are the ones concerned.Itlr. Borgen is reqrequesting that the existing lot line be abandone.d,: Antl that a new Iotne b-eidra'wntr - o 'u""y lminor change., and. iilt 1et hin.explain thei:r-basonb fo; ii.
'.\ !i;:r;ij,, i !.,(.:(: I , il:i'!i. i,i, :.. :...liiii P,:.,0-*1,lj) .l ,i r',.': : :.' .. : ' i . r..r, , .':-i':r*:-:I);i..,il ,- -.-. :..-iii ;,"r-:*l' -i'';ui.ii-,Y,','", .1".' L
IBoYE+t1i.'"FrrnraskLng thutjthis cornmon "o*ur betr{reen lot 5 and lot 6 be moved 12 feet!9..!.f9 e.+st., tihen this single farnilv horaHi\b. f'r: - r."'|i.( ' .\'(r:.: r','..ii'i i.-r.,' ,liiir"S€rll-t, byil5:n..1,fi1,..1,o,3r, .tt',JE{rE:FE{.E: detached#idb;."i1,::'r,'llJ'ln:,..,?1,'".i.1l8,r"ii3$iJI.,,Lg$".fl-'. by+lt:n
.,1,|i',,."1,?J
S't'ott: Itt! I ii'i' t(J I'roy u Llr.ri jiiicc tirc agrlrllr..;.: h:rs tir,i s:li. i:,f icd tltt r'.iiili:"-':.: -'i)::
PEC-4-2-9-81
Petel: Basically, tr,i, Pcluaning up the lot rlnu u"""ulhe county regulationsare different fron the Townrs. It wil 1 eliminate the non-conforming use, and lot6 is still a legal size.
After nore discussion, Gerry asked for a notion. Roger noved and Duane seconded thatthe_request to revise the existing lot line between iots 5 and 6, Block 5, BighornSubdivision, sth Addition be approved. The vote to approve was 6-0, with Dan Corcoranabstaining.
5t. $'.requgst for an exterior alteration and modification in Corunercial Core I andheight v""i"t""
""Creek Drive. Applicant: Bob Fritch.
Peter went over his memo. He explained that this was reviewed at the Deceurber 12work session- briefly-, nentioning that it was a rninor addition, and that the only reasonthat it was before the Planning Cornmission was because it was an exterior alteration,as miniutun as it is. The staff had revi.ewed it and it had no effect on any of theurban Design criteria really, as the nemo stated. The question was did it need aheight variance, the staff has deterrnined that it is basically an architecturalprojection and no height variance is required. The Sitzmark ii a legal existingnon-conforning structu-re with regard to height, and the shaft was noi going to increasethat discrePalcl so that no hellht variance is needed, and staff is reconnendi.ngapproval of the project.
Duane Piper of l{heeler-Piper explained that the height was ssr and showed diawingswith nore explanation. The brelk down square footage to this is: mechanical equipnent2-s8 sg ft., public lobby space increased 17g sq ft, the harrway is extended to putthe elevator on the interior^space. upper two
-floors have storage roons, 1J2 sq ft,so total envelope sq ft is 60g.
Dan corcoran noved, and Gaynor seconded to grant the request as stated in the nenofrom the staff.srlHject to the following conJition; - ' -
. The applicant aCrggs to part.icipate in the Vai1. Villageimprovernent district if and when forrned for Vail Vil1age. , . ...
The vote to approve was 6-0, with Duane pipdr abstainlng.
&lgtt exterior alteration aud modification eommerc ia I Core I for
L1on
shops at 304
ing, to construct-Enree ;&[Tm-nadT-m]Bridge Street. Applicant: Jeff Selby.
units an
|::l-*fl,_^It:_!l11T.r:, "ld menbers of the planning conrnission: This is a requestunder the new procedure. ihat was 5uii .iopt"a ty the"pranning conrnission last ,ff;;for a new addition to the Red Lion. The Flanning Corunission has had extensivepresentation at the joint meeting between the plinning cormnission and the Councilol .tJte proposal . Proposed_is approximately 2,bgO sq ft of n"" comnercial spacewhich would be by seibert Circll'ana we felr woutd u". uuti*t connection in SeibertCircle for people to go up there and shop and browse and just rnake the area a rnuchmoie act-i-ve and pleasant space. Also requested is 3 second floor dwelling unitsthat would contain approxinately 3,5g0 sq ft. The proposal for residential spaceis -substantially under the allowed 6ross Residential Floor Area for the building.I think the applicant has been very responsive to concerns of dealing r{rith the sitecorning up with a new addition to tire stiucture that j.s very conpatible with what isproposed under the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. il"o,-the applicani tu,
:::Pond"g,. in the.staffrs view, to dealing with the ninor view corridor of the VailVillage Urban Design Guide Plan. rn the minor vier,/ corridor, there can be sone modi-
G
PEC-s-2-9-81
The view corridor: There isHill Street. The staff does
fication to this view corridor. I think wefve all seen the presentation on the nodi-fication that would take place at the view corridor. I think werve also looked atwhat sone of the inplications are if the building is rnodified in other *"yr-rh"ruother private views would be blocked substantialiy if the applicant, continued to gowith the Gross Residential Floor Arba that is allbwed. The staff has looked at theUrban Design Considerations t.hat the Planning Comrnission needs to review as far aspedestrianization is concerned. I think it is an inprovenent to pedestrianizationinto the seibert circle area. There is a better conirection to thl Mill Creek BuildingItoving the Seibert Circle area to the north, which is proposed under the Urban Desj.gnGuide Plan. The Seibert Circle which actuaity have rot" i.rn during certain times ofthe year and becone an even more viable place with some redesign oi that particulararea' The vehicle penetration: Potentially there could be fewer vehicles there becausethere is presently a-2 cat garage where people cone to park at the garage and they alsotend to park at the-back of the garage, so at tirnes theie could be 4 vehicles cominginto the core at all times, realizing ih"t th"y have alnost a permanent parking place.
ltn the village. Under the proposal , there wouid be a loading and unloading zone byMill Creek, so that the people-who wouLd be using the conJominiums would be able rouse that area to load and unload their vehicles, and then they would be required, .unless
!1."y ]tu9 some space that we donrt know about, to go to the parking structure, or ifthey had a rentar car, they could return the rentil car, belaus. ihey ruy noi need ituntil the end of the week or until they go back to Denver, or wherever tley may be going.
on the east side would also be the loading area, so that the trucks that would be servicirthis building would be able to use that. The st.reetscape framework I think werve alreadytalked about, in fact, we feel that adding conmercial sirops to that, end of the streety'|1 nrovide-the opportunity for people to actually "o*" irp there and walk throughSeibert Circle instead of just, wirat^many do, look dor,n th; street and decide thatit is not wofth going down further to t'till creek, and I think it will be an improvedoPPortunity plus, fron the <iesign viewpoint, it will be a very beautiful entry-intothe shops
street edge and street enclosure: The applicant has dernonstrated that the street enclo-sure of I/2 to 1 that- is expressed in iire \iail Village Urban Design Guide plan isnet by this, and that there i! some street enclosure by the proposal , but I think ifyou look at the nodel here today, thexe is still a very comfirt;ble ieeling as you wouldwalk down the street,
Building height: The proposal does neet the Urban Design Guide plan for building height,actually the whole building, I believe is rurder 30 feet which is one of the nain criteriasIt doesnrt even have to, have the other percentage--30 to 40 feet where a certain percen-tage could be actual ly higher.
sone intrusion into the view corridor taking place fronfeel that, that is an acceptable change to the view corridor.
The sun/shade: There is no inpact because the sun is coming fron the south and thebuilding is not shading the stieet or another building.
As far as the zoning code is concerned, the najor aspect there would be that the applicantwould be required to p1y the-parking fee that has beln established for Vail Villagefor the new addition of residential space and for the new addition of the conrnercialsPace that will be in the building, and would be responsible for paying for the renoval,of the parking spaces that are i.n*ihe presenr garage.. :i:rl:_-.
PEC-6-'2/e/81 o
Under the architectural and landscape controls that are in the Design Considerationsof the Urban Design Guide Plan, I think the applicant, as far as the architecturaldesign, has responded to the essence of what i! being proposed in the Design Considera-tions, and actually has the design of the building fit the character of Vail Village,and also fits the building that is currently there. The design, we feel, blends inand is very complinentary to the existing Red Lion building. The reconmendation ofthe staff is for approval of the request subject t.o 3 conditions:
l: The applicant agrees to participate in and remonstrate against .a special inprovenen.ldistrict if and when formed for VaiI Village.
2: The applicant agrees to upgrade the landscaping along Mill Creek and and present
the plan to the Corununity Developnent departneni for appioval .
3. And the applicant agrees to participate financially in street inprovements, forexarnple street Pavers, street lights and the relocated focal point ai Seibert 6ircleif an inprovement district is not forned, and the applicant will share a similar amountif we are able to get agreenent frorn al 1 the properiy owners in the surrounding areato agree upon sonething like a special assessment to inprove Seibert Circle. Irn surethe Town would also be partj.cipaiing in what improv"*rnis would be there.
Gerry: Are there cownents from the applicant?
Peter: We received a letter, I think all of the planning corunission rnembers have acopy of this, dated February 3, 1981, addressed to the Planning and EnvironrnentalConmission: Dear Mr. Chairnan and Corrunission nenbers:
"With regret I an unablte to attend your published rneeting on February g, 1981, as Imrst be in Chicago that day. I wish to present to the -omnission, by w"y of a 15 minutewalking site visit, opposition by l.{rs. Coitlandt Hill and nyself, iaci-. cuitin, to therequest to modify the exterior of the Red Lion building in Commercial Core I. I respect-fully request you allow a continuance of your hearing itttif r nay present collectivl!or-individually to {ou-ny opposition material . Your schedule, I'understand, is veryfull, but because of the importance of your decision, I hope you will feel conpellerlto hear the property owners who are definitely affecied by^"rrj, decision you mice. Ialn at your convenience lhesday, February lOth on, for my present.at.ion. thank you foryour consideration of my request. "
And si.gned by Jack J. curtin with copi"es to slifer, caplan, Mrs. Joan Hill, and ne.
Bill Ruoff: I an Bill Ruoff, architect for the project. Before I go into rny presentatiolIrd like to say that Dick just stole my thunder.- Hl said al1 the things t am prepared
!? su)r: I_could_rePeat then all and elaborate on any, but ltd like to ask for sonedirection fron the planning commission. Do you want- to hear me say it all again andpoint to the pictures at the sane tine, or move on to particulars? Dick gave a rather
cornprehensive point by point explanation.
Dan: Has the presentation changed any at all, or-substantially from what you gave usat our joint ureeting?
Ruoff: Nothing substantive. At that tine, when you saw this rnodel 4 weeks ago, there
werenrt any windows on this building, there werenrt any people in the streets, but the
Red Lion building itself has not beEn touched. I canti ieurember, did vre have the picture
painted on the wall?
Dan: If there is sonething really differcnt that we did not go over last titnc, thatrs
o
rnaybe what we should discuss.
Ruoff: No, there is not. We have cqme today prepared to show you
sentation that you saw at the joint neeting at the Athletic Club. .'.:'-:.... ...
Roger: .I think that everybody on qur-qo;;ission heard-ih"t, diia-rrriidss'there are
people-in.the audience-who cane h9r9.,p41!i.cularly for'this i.ssueldnd.w6uta.f ite to
hear-it--again, I:don:t.think that.ig-neqgtsety. .. -. _ .. .. _ -...:.
Peter:.:Sid just;!rgugh1 -up the poinl ,that rnaybe
light:tbat, - if ao apPeal -!s fi1ed, !l-19y ry+l! have
the Council.
nuoig:-.ft" g""ptri" nate4ials, the piciures and the-nodel are
nothing to what was there. If you would like, in the.interest
ideniiial .'-We have added
of saving time, we could
think you need,- Most of, the fi.ndingp-h4ve,.been nalg.py.1he
found to comply r+ith the relevant ordinances. I dontt knovi
what you
it has been
to have
to go through the entire presentation.
i::':"': .-.t: lL.:t-:- a(,:--. a-:t:.- _. --: -_:ra a:-,:r-__i.t-, .Sibley: I just want to make sure that the 'exhibits rnight be used at the tine that we are
ini',frsnt of,. the--Csungi-l ,- 35, this:lgt:qgr .ildigates n3g.$, happe^, -I,-yg314 just as s.oon
atcd,e.asf:nake refsrenc.e--tg*!hos.e. sp,eglfip.gxhibits. tha.t.you have npr., l;..r., .- '
Cc,:-:.-s..:--: -.::: ... J:.:_..- :r:..: i.c::...r:.. . ..-:..r1--:.
Gerry: I would just make one coxnnent, and that is that the questions that were raised
arid disc*rssed aI .tiat,:jpint: Ineeflng;.s\e-{d;p-e ,rais5rd and disc.us.s55lrgr€Ain, 1i-S.ht now-. :Fm.:Strere-cord.:::r -: ii,:i-. c:.. - rirs:i io::.::.-..1. -_c .;;.,, - _.__.rr.o,r, o\ l,.il , . _- ,,_r"u,.lii.-;.:-:-: :--. .'_.::-,. .-:,. _1-::--_:._ :... l.::--r, .i.c----. - -. .,.. ;_-i- l:: : -_:-:. .l:.a,. _,, -
Rttof,f.:.-.flurrning-d-own..!he-:l-_iS.t, f,ro1n t!9- GU.i.de_lines; !i-q! has alreadi,-do1e,"- ,I -can i-epdi1--- -thaq.\I s.an.-ta:1k'-briefly'.alo-ut;,-t.[9-,gr-aJri+€s,.:,.-.{e_Wi]:t.J_oo} a_t the-Ftrq3f:,ovierl-ays JhaL,:--'
wq,irauq::that displsy,t!r-e;yie-rq,c*o.rri_d,ori and lt"" iitFi:,;i.-e..a-!fe.cteri] .Lsfi-esi'what I'rif -
say'ihg,, :de you-.a[ipk:th-at- i!:::i.s. Ir-9q-ess,a-rl,;f-o:r Fg- tg_,rgpe_"t .subs.tgLlrq;gJili;.lJiat Dick just
wen itJttough. , -'.,1 .ri. ir,...- :..- ,..,:. l.t,: i,.,i:::---.- . :::,jJ:.3i :.. :.::... 6cct_c:ci 1..:..:i:. i: \ i:..t , .it._i:.. ,...:ii i. l::,u:--... 1.::-:.:-. tc:. I:j. I r.- s:,:tia-_ic:,. l;;. ..,-... :a:-
Ge.la.Jn: c,ilc;: -l :dgttli c :I *hiil.k,i-q lip irnportant . . .
RaEal:si!trf,Jqu anfofae. ldtpJll.e rS-aJdqo|ie s tc Slrfci. Cai:,:;,. iti_s. Joan Jlj.L;. r:,i: n...
lrlcscr:i::tic'
trme.
:rr: ..
:r. ii;].w].tn
be'dir'--
fron what \'{'ij Sille u-t
PEC-7-zlel$r
ntffiffr: l'oJ.,ittri.rr$nsrtthre$f.tti\+9 d,1ewgp.sp gttLc|h,,.ti+rfu el\E SfFl 'IuEi.lf
,FqrJ..t\",91s\,lhrg.,"r"
Plv\tAtil'(ri)trs1,' rJlli.ir';lss.cll'qtPlsq'Blpt',.',:fl\lt.pJ..l\.istru.lsn,,\l-!.,!fLYJll'9Ir',P'i{tF8..Il.t99.tr'.i,.
arytdrti'i\irt',)\i1r.l1'$1c$5end$..rurqn.'+".,atilt;,.q-tqf.|iii"lut,tl{t}iq,,lihj'.rfii.lT.t';i.,ti},,Rr filii:,,j..;"r.s$ilIllt[t]tu1 t\t][t{ll\tlp'1 lnc r'ed Line superimposcd upon tho bluc PIan ot tllc ncw l]ulfdrng
is'ltcl'c tor t'r:tc'rc'trce to show the red linc is thc existing wall of the Red Lion as you
sqftrt:t {r tlil.+.l.'lFJtuh'.1'llrinrlt
"4"te6''ffrf8p.9,tot\*T *.}uoffo,p.T% ijrjl."" ltogf"r'il}J,. .rTl\u,,
PEC-8 -2/9/8L
proPosed addition does. These are the 3 elevation drawings which show in considerabledetail the proposed changes. To answer specific points in the Guide Lines for archi-
tectural detail, articulation, pedestrian scale on the street.
The top drawing on this side and the one below it illustrate the difference between
the street enclosure ratio as it exists today with the roof of the Red Lion coning down
very low to only about 7 feet, really above the street. The existing patio there isactually below street level . The drawing irrunediately below shows the sane relationship
as it will exist after the addition is nade. The average ratio of width to height isalnost exactly I/4 to I at present. Under the Guide Lines, this is considered beyondlimits of good cornforable street enclosure. lt/hat werve been able to do is achieve
L/2 to 1, alnost exactly l/2 to I which is considered optimun.
The next drawing is really just an il.lustration of the height statistics on the building
The red line shows the height that is allowed under the currently extisting zoning and
Guide Lines. It could be a 3 story building, as are a1 I of the surrounding buildings
except one 2 story and one 4 story. Ihe'avcrage height of all surrounding buildingsin the neighborhood is 3 stories. Werre proposing, though, for a nudber of reasons,
the Red Lion addition be kept doun to 2 stories. This also keeps GRFA and other things
way under the lirnit--about 4000 sq ft under the linit on GRFA and a whole story height
under on the height of the building.
The botton drawing illustrates the principal pedestrian pathways up Bridge Street, in
and out of Bridge Street, and around Seibert Circle as they will exist after the projectis finished. They are not substantially different fron what they are today, but wefeel that the introduction of interesting transparent shop fronts from the Red Lion
entrance on around the corner into Hanson Ranch Road toward Mil1 Creek Court buildingwill draw the pedestrians in a way that they presently do not go. When they cone up,
they follow thispathon by Baxterts and The Slope toward the rnountain or go over toCyrano's, but there is nothing to draw them this way. We think we can close the circle
and contain this square, the plaza area. Real1y, we think wetre going to conplete it.I'here are several other drawings that we have here which you saw at the other neeting.
We pinned them up and down, and I think we should do so again today for a very briefreview. They are background info:rnation, and we use them to answer questions, ifyout11 temember, on heights, and what if we did sornething else instead of w\at we did.
We spent no time, we didnrt even refer to them rnuch nore than to say that we had themthe other tine, because they are not of direct interest at this tine. They are thefloor plans of the three floors as they will exist after the addition is nade. The
basement which will contain the nite club and contain the noise because there wonrtbe any windows that will open out below the neighbors, the shops and the new
condoninj.uns as they will exist on the floor above. Let us iust run through thern all.
Ihis, I dontt believe I did show the other time, because I dontt think we got into it.
I" lt"9 this one up. The red lines show the outline of what the 3 story building wouldlook like. This is an actual rendered elevation of what it would look like. lrle thinkthat it is a noot poi.nt at this stage, because we don't really want to go to that height.
:These are overlays of the principal elevation of the building. There are severalseries of dotted lines. They are all a little different from the one you see. Butwithin it, we are able to show the principal aLternative methods of putting the roofs
on this building. The reason we chose the one that you see in the final drawi.ngs uphere, is because we feel it is the best conpromise on the issue of vj.ew planes and; view corridors. We feel that the two low gables that werve shown there are better than: any of these. We bring these along, and occaisionally someone asks, rtWell, what if
"you did this instead of tltat?", we can show on these exactly whatrwould have happened- if we had done this instead of that and why we chose the one that y-ou see in the nodel .
!:. 'i : t': !..r" rtt .il! ;.-.,
' rtrC itl i':
PEC - 9- 2/e/8L
these are sun angle and shadow diagrans which we refered the last time, because, as
Dick says, they rcally arenrt germain to our problem because werre fortunate enough
to be on the north side of the street. Werre not casting shadows on anyone. These
basically show how the neighbor casts a little bit of shadow on us.
And this is a depiction of the actual view corridor as it exists through Hill Street.
there is a very sfignt difference between this one and the angles as they are- shown
on the officiai Town map in the Guide Lines. We discovered when we got out there with
our instrurnents and cameras and rneasurements and so forth, that the one on the Town
plan is off by about naybe one degree. It is a very ninor thing. We platted this
one frorn information which we generated through the project, and it is a little nore
accurate because we had a little nore time to dig into it. This is an extremely accurat
calculated projection of the view corridor.
The principal exhibits concerning the view corridor, of course,
The large photographs.
e pictorial ones .
o
Thatrs it for now. The overlay done.in color to enphasize rather than di.rninish it,
the impact on the view corridor as it will be vierved from what we consider is probably
the rnoit critical point in the entire length of Hill Street which isnrt very much.
That critical poinl, we feel is back here. Itrs actually standing in Jack Curtinrs
front door, which is right there. The reason we feel this is irnportant is because all
of the p"opf" traversing Wa11 Street heading toward the nountain or wherever, pass this
way, thly can look over their shoulder..is what they'll see as opposed to the people
wait<ing through the street. Only half of thern can see it, unless theyrve 8ot eyes on
the bick of their heads, so we feel that this is the nost important one. We do have
also on a smaller scale, a series of Photographs showing how it disappears as you walk
forward up Hill Street. They are sruallet, we did not pin then up at the other- neeting,
we again, just rnention that ihey are here as part of the naterial from which these were
entargea, so that you can see frorn across the room. The view of the snow capped peaks
of thi Gore renaini, but what we will cut off is some of the foreground and a big brown
hillside above the highway. It actually comes .down by the golf course. '
We feel to the visitor an<l to most people it is the snow caPped peal<s out there that
are the most inportant part of the view. So that is the degree to which we inpinge
upon the minor view corridor in Hill Street.
We went a Little farther than is required strictly under zoning and- other regulations.
We did the sane kind of study on the two adjoining neighbors upon whom there is inpact
views. And that is the two on either side of Flill Street here on the 2nd floor at the
end of the Plaza Lodge is the apartment of Mrs. JoAnn HiIl. Across the stTeet on the
entire 2nd and Srd floors of this building is the residence of Mrs. Cortlandt Hill-
We will have an impact upon the view from JoAnn Hill's living room, and we will have
an inpact on the view fron Jack Curtinrs apartnent. Windows over here and the rest
of hei house are not affected. O.K. This photograph was taken from jus! inside, 20tl
back of the big sliding glass door which is the nain viewing point frorn JoAnn Hillts
living roon. This is what she sees today. The inpact on her view is rather slnilar
to whlt it is in Hill Street. Her view now is cut off by the existing chinney of the
Red Lion and the top floors of the Christiana. She sees the peaks across here-and
sone of the valley ind brown hillside in the foreground. Our new roof line will come
across here and cut off that bottom piece right in there about like this. It will
still leave the view of the peaks. ilow let'i look at the similar thing as seetr from
Mrs. Cortlandt Hillts house. Herers the vicw. The addition will come out this way.
The piece of view that is cut off here--nonc of the peaks are irnpacted at all. This
ena bf the roof right herc will cut off this piece oi, again, the sarne sage brush hill-
side opposite the 6th 6 foth fairways on thc golf course besidc the highway. In brief
forrn, iirat is the presentation--the points thit we reviewed at the joint neeting 3 or
4 weeks ago, the rnaterial that we showed at that tine.
PEC rO - 2/s/8L
Gerry: Thank you, Bill. I would just like to nake one conment quickty, the same cotnnent
that I rade at the joint neeting. That is, that I think that you have a rather signifi-
cant impact on the view corridor on Hill Street, and that, in terms of the streetscape,
that by moving what would be the southwest corner of your roof
back about 15 feet, it would be more inviting in terms of taking people around the corner
which is, after all, what your design plan is hoping will be achieved, and would have
less of an impact in terns of a confining streetscape whi,ch I think is what the impact
will be. It will be confining in terrns of Bridge Street. It will extend Bridge Street
up a little bit further than I think it should be. So thatrs ny colrunent which is the
sane connent Lnade before. Does anybody else have corunents?
Gaynor: I thjnk I liked it the way it is being proposed in the sense that I think that
they have, on the south end, done enough design work, both on the roof and the indenta-
tions and entrance ways and windows to not create a squale building on the end, and
I like the way it is proposed
Scott: If you noved back 15 feet, you would have less than L/2 to I ratio, for sone
reason, the rnagic nunber in the Guide Plan.
Gerry: I would just comnent that that is a reconnende4 nurnber. StreetscaPes and view
corridors are not necessarily deterrnirred by nffiber1-ifone.
Roger: The view corridor is identified as a secondary view corridot, is it not?
Gerry: Yes.
Roger: In our deliberations, I think, in the developnent of the Guide Plan, those were
not considered as prinary factors to be concerned with. I like the desiSn the way he
has it. It think a very nice job in addressing the problerns in trying to mitigate all
of the potential objections, and I think that, based on the allowed GRFA, I think they
exhibit a Lot of restraint.
Gerry; Dan, do you have any connents?
Dan: I like the presentation. I think it is a nice treatment of the site.
Duane: I do agree that we have obstructed to a certain degree the minor view corridor.
I feel in this particular case that the inprovement to the nore inti-nate streetscaPe,
the sense of views, and the arrangements of the buildings out weight the fact that we
do have a slight obstruction there. I do like the additj.on, and am in favor of it.
Jin: I think the impact as being shown here is probably the best picture you can get
of it. As you go down the alley, the inpact of the building is considerably nore.
You move about 10 feet down and you lose the peaks, don't you?
o
as you walk through now, you begin to lose the view about here. With the
begin to lose it about here. It dininishes until we reach this Point
and itts gone. As it is now, it dirninishes and you lose it about here.
Ruoff: Jim,
addition, you
in this area,
Gerry: My concern isnrt with seeing the peaks in total per se. lrty concern is with
the sense of space. That the whole concept of space, of course, is what urakes Bridge
Street unique. I think that this goes just a little bit further than it should in
terns of enclosing the street. I think that both things can be achieved. I like the
building,'and I like the fact that the building is bigger in that Particular spot. I
like the fact that the road is closed, but not that nuch.
.. :. -
, PEC tr- 2/9/8L
^.o'Ruoff: As with most of Y"ru things, Gerry, we end up comprising between a lot of' different aspects, there is a compromj.sc in shape of buiLding to naintain as nuch
as possible the view. Itts true, on the I'at j.os in here, we have followed the recommended
guide lines rather closely. It wasntt difficult because it just happened to work out
that the 2 story scheme here gave it to us. We consciously wanted to create more of
a sense of enclosure for the Seibert Circle area, and we fcel now that with the roof
sloping down, the space isnrt contained very well. But this we have already discussed
before. There is no doubt it is a cornpronise amongst many elements.
Gerry: Are there any comnents frorn the audience?
Robert Oliver: l"ty narne is Robert Oliver, and I work for the Plaza Lodge and also
for the possibi.lity of represcnting l'{rs. Hil1. She is concerned about the things that
you are talking about as far as the view corridor dor*n HilI Street, and frorn the view
from her apartnent. These people are trying their best, and she is stil1 concerned
about the lack of view corridor that is going to cone out of her casenent windows and
also that s1 iding glass door. Just one thing that I caught that you were saying, Dick.
I canrt understand why you can say that there is a potential loss of traffic there.
You canrt take one condoniniuur and turn it into 5 and add 5 shop sPaces and not expect
a traffic flow on Bridge Street. For someone who has a shop there, or for someone
who has given their condominium to Slifer to rent out every week, that traffic is going
to be much greater.
Dick: Well, I think there is a potential for being less traffic in the sense that
right now there are a lot of people who cone and park in those sPaces on a continuing
basis of just pulling in and pull j-ng out using the core area. With the condominiurns,
at least there is the potential that you would corne in, drop your bags off one day,
and you nay not need to cone back until you actually leave the site--instead of coning
in there and saying, I'Well, I want to go soneplace to do some quick shopping.rr You
are probably going to get on the shuttle bus rather than walk back to the transPortation
center if you left the car there, or if you have turned the car in.
Robert Oliver: That might be true, but you can't add all that space and say that the
traffic is going to go down.
Dick: I guess my feeling is that itts not g<ting to increase dramatically, and thereis the potential that it could go down, just fron what I see of the use of those spaces
in front of the garage nor,r, which are constantly being used by everybody in Town topull in and park, because they know there is a parking space there.
Robert Ol.iver: I think the odds are that it is going to go up.
Jim: Yes, you would have to expect nore traffic with people having to bring st,uff into
shops. l{hat you are sayi-ng is that there is space there that people are parki.ng in,
and for sone reason, because you are golng to eat up some of that space neans that you
are going to have less parking. But the actual demand of, like those 5 shops and 5
condos, I can see is going to have more demand that what you have there now, in terms
of vehicular traffic.
Dick: I think the potential for shops will be 3 srnall shops, probably, because there
are only 3,000 sq ft.
Ruoff: The potential here is for 3 shops.
ji*.t .W"fI, whatever, I mean therets got to be an increase in vehicutar traffic. I
donrt see how you can go from the resiaurant and one condo to....
Ruoff: Jim, we dontt feel that there is going to be any substantial increase iu.Sunbers
in vehicles because these are not food operations, we dontt have food and neat trucks
PEC 12 2/9/8L o
that have to cone every day to them. They are snall shops that tend to get shipnents
pretty often, mostly by freight, UPS, or somet.hing is delivered to their hone because
theytre using their garage as an extra warehouse. But, aside from the owner bringing
in their station wagon occasionally to haul something that he is storing in his Earage,
we see the UPS nan parked here sonewhere today anyway, while he goes to 4 or 5 places
here, goes to 2 ski shops, and all the surrounding neighborhood. Werte not going to brini
the UPS in more often. We nay cause him to park there an extra 5 ninutes while he
runs into these 3 shops and nakes deliveries. But we feel that that is quite different
fron bringing hin in nany nore tirnes. We dontt think he will do that. We think that
the existing pattern of the trucks that park along here in front ofCyranorsand Gold
Peak wilL continue. Sorne of the points that we have discussed before, go a little beyond
this project. We did at the work session discuss a little bit some of the things that
will happen when and if the Seibert Circle irnprovernents and inplemented because they
complenent what we are doing. That will help to chanelize the traffic so the trucks
then wilL always park on the sane side of the street, and you wonrt find Burnettts truck
clogging the other side, so that if an energency vehicle does cone through, he cantt
get through. These will be inprovements. Again, the cars. We all know the history
of the building. For many years Marg and Larry Burdick lived there full time. It was
their nain hone. They kept 2 cars in the gatage, and they are like all of us. If they
had lots of business around town, and theytd run in and out. The nunber of vehicular
novements is what werve concerned with. Now, I didntt have any reason, and I donrt
think anyone else did, but cornmon sense, if you think about it a ninute, nay Point a
direction. An active couple living here full time, and the times they bring their cars
out and in every day on the average is 2 or 3 tines a day for each car--is going to
exceed the nunber of car novenents for a condo owner who cones and stays a week, who
cones in and out once. I really think the situation for the condos in the building
is going to be very sinilar to what we have at the Plaza Lodge today, because your guests
go in and out. Now they wontt likely stay--r,rho knows? Who knows who is going to buy
those, how long theytre going to use it. Itll te1l you one thing, though, letrs not
go and play the paper nunbers gane, but letrs be realistic about it. The prices for
which units go in the center of the Village automatically tel1 us sonething. That they
are going to be bought by people with that rnuch rnoney. People with that much money
in the cookie jar to slap down on fancy apartnents in the center of the village,
and then spend about $200,000 to decorate it, are really not interested in having Slifer
stuff i-t with every coner and run it like a hotel , because that anount of incone,
theyrre not interested in, and most of those people donrt want those people staying
in their place in Vail. They arenrt rented very often. Theytre given away to friends
and fanily. Realities of econonics and human nature pretty well tell us that, no,
these are not going to have the frequency of use that the srnller condos in other Partsof the corununity do.
Gerry: Thank you, Bill.
Dick: Ird just like to add that there is also going to be a loading area along the
east side of the building, too, so that there will be the opportunity for sotneone corning
in there to unload their bags and luggage without actually being parked in the street.
Ruoff: And the neighboring points in the Improve Vail plan completnent this beautifully.
Gerry: Are there other cornrnents or questions?
Ed Drager: Itn here as an interested citizen. I sat on that same planning corunission
up there for 4 years, ahd for 4 years I and a whole lot of other people worked to get
the Irnprove Vail job done to stop development as a matter of right in the corunercial
core of Vail . It has becn accomplished, and I think the developers here have shown
a great deal of sensitivity to the work and the desires and thc hopes that we had
and one of the agonizing things that we went through was whcther or not HilI Street
was a eten::a rilinor view corridor at the tine. I think the modifications here on the
PEC Ls 2/9/8L oo
. Red'Lion'are going to hurt, naybe shorten up that view corridor, but I think the improve-
nent overall is a very good improvement. If I were sitting on that side of the table
today, Ild be voting for it. Thank you.
Gerry: Thank you, Ed. Are there any other corunents from the audience?
Gaynor: Are you going to be required to have parking spaces?
Ruoff: At the end of the Townrs recomnendation, is stated the condition
Dick: On page 3 at the bottom of the page, they witl be required to pay the appropriate
fee for parking.
Gerry: I'm just going to quickly ask Jeff if he is farniliar with and comfortable with
the conditions of approval?
Selby: Would you read those to me?
Gerry: Sure. The applicant agrees to participate in not remonstrate against a special
iurprovenent district if and when formed for Vail Village. 2. the applicant agrees
to upgrade the landscaping along MiIl Creek and present the plan to Corurunity Developnen' for approval. 3. The applicant agrees to participate financially in street inprovementse.g. street Pavers, street lights and the relocated focal point at Seibert Circle if
an inprovement district is not formed. The applicantrs share would be deternined by
the stTeet frontage of property in Seibert Circle and other property owners in area
would al.so have to agree to participate
Selby: On the final one, it would not be of the situation where Itd be the only property
onner in the area. The applicantrs share would be deternined by street frontage property
on Seibert Circle of all property ownels contributing, is that correct?
Gerry: Thatrs correct.
Selby: I think we can live with all those recomlnendations.
Gerry: You are aware that these are conditions for approval , if approved, it would
be approved on those conditions.
Selby: Yes, I understand. Ihose things nay not be known until such time as inprovernents
are conpleted, but I would assume that those conditions would go beyond the period in
which we inprove the property. It seens to me that we nay get down the road here in
a year or 2, and everyone will say, rrletrs upgrade Seibert Circle in that arearr,.and
we would be requested to come in at that tine to contribute funds toward those inprovenenlI have no trouble with that as long as it is an axea wide understanding with other
property owners .
Dan: I would noove to approve the request for an exterior alteration and urodification
in Connercial Core I for the Red Lion building per the staff meno and as presented today.
Gerry: We have a motion for approvat by Dan Corcoran. Is there a second?
Roger: Yes. I second.
Gerry: Second by Roger Tilkerneier. A11 those in favor? Scott Edwards, Roger Tilkeneier,
Gaynor lrliller, Dan Corcoran, Duane piper, Jirn Morgan.
And Itur against because I dontt like that one section of that one building.
l.lotion passed 6_1.'.'
'1G'
I
PLAI.INING AI{D ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGEI'IDA
Monday, February 9, l98l
l:30 Site inspections of Garton alley and deck and Luke,(lot 5, bll 3, Bighorn 5)
2z3O Study Session:
To study a proposal to close the alley betweeh the Plaza and the Casino
Buildings in Vail-Village.
3:00 Regular Session:
l. Approval of,ninutes of neeting of January'12, 1981.
2. Approval of ninutes of neeting of January 26, 1981.
3. Luke density control variance, Lot 5, Block 5, Bighorn Sub, 3rd Addition
(tabled fron January 26 neeting)
lots 5 and 6, Bighorn sth Addition. Applicant: Bjorn Borgen.
5. A request for an exterior alteration anil nodification jr Connercial Core I
and height variance to constnrct an elevator at the Sitznark building located
at 185 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Bob Fritch.
6. A request for an exterior alteration and nodification in Connercial Gore I
for the Red Lion building, to construct three additional dwelling units and
shops at 304 East Bridge Street. Applicant: Jeff Selby.
Published in the Vail Trail February 6, l98l .
Sitznark
Gore Creek Plaza BlSg
% Chuck Rosenquist
193 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Co 81657
Lodge at Vail
174 Gore Creek Drive
Thor Loberg, Manager
Riva North Chalet Condo Owners Assoc.
174 Gore Creek Dr.
Riva South Chalet Condo Owner Assoc.
174 Gore Creek Dr.
Lodge South Condo Owner Assoc.
174 Gore Creek Drive
teigh H. Norgren & Co
85 Meade Lane
Englewood, 80110(lot s)
Talisnan Condo Assoc.
% Kiandra Lodge
20 Vail Road
Vail Co 81657
Kiandra Lodge
20 Vail Road
Mike Knopp, Mgr.
Village Center Assoc
Cecil Dotson
P.O. Box 667
Vail, Co
Fred Hib6erd
774 BaseLine Road
Meeker, 81641
Vail Core Condo Assoc (Village Center above
% Dr. Ton Jost
Box 2227
Vail, Co
Arthur Bishop g Co
302 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail Co
NI/),5 4)5,'t" (
Lt)
Public Notices no.Ltj lzzlat
connercial bldg)
13-o
o
PUBTIC.NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Corunission of the Town
of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with the Zoning Code of the Vail
Municipal Code on February 9, 1981 at 3:00 p.n. at the Town Council bhambers in the
!,lunicipal Building.
Public hearing and consideration of:
A. A request for a
rezoning of part of
and from Two Fanil;'
for part of lot 17,
W. Distelhorst.
ninor subdivision to create two lots and two tracts and a
the 1ot fron Two'Fami.ly Residential to Primary/Secondary District
Residential District to Greenbelt q Natural Open Space District
Bighorn Subdivision, 4th Addition' Applicant: Frederick
B. A request for a minor subdivision to relocate an existing lot line between lots
5 and 6, Block 5, Bighorn Sth Addition, Applicant: Bjorn Borgen'
C. A request for an exterior alteration and modification in Commercial Core I for
the Red Lion building to construct three additional dwelling units and shops at 304
East Bridge street (Lots E, F, G, and H of Block 5A, vail Village lst Filing),
Applicant: Jeff SelbY.
D. A request for an exterior alteration and nodification in Corrunercial Core I and
height variance to construct an elevator at the Sitzmark building located at 183 Gore
Creek Drive (lot 58, Vail Village lst Filing), Applicant: Bob Fritch'
E. A request for an exterior alteration and rnodification in Comrnercial Core II for
the Lj-onstlead Center building to constluct additi.onal conmcrcial space at West Lions
Head Ma1 I (Lot 5, Block l, Vail Lionsl{ea<l lst Filing). Applicants: Charlcs R' Crowley,
John Purcell, Jeff Selby, and Francis Tang. (Note: Three separate applications for
rthe same general area).
Tlre applications and infornation relating to the request is available at the Zoning
Adninistratorrs office in the l,hrnicipal Building during regular business hours?for
review or inspoction by the public.
A. PETER PATEN, JR.
Zoning Adninistrator
TOI{}.I OF VAII
DEPARTMF'IT OF COTfi{'NITY DEVELOPMENT ..i
To be published in the Vail Trail on January 25, 1981.
i
!+I
../'t, '
II.
ttill not be accePted untilThe aPPlication wilr noE De 'rt-us;
A. NAME OF APPI'ICANT
Dare olppricatio ^ ll't4'bo
buildingpatio or
revievr bY
al.l information is submit{:ed.
o
APPI,ICATION !'ORM. T'OR I1XTERIOR ALTERATIONS'
OR IIIODIFICATIONS IN COMIII]RCIAL CORE I' (CCI)
This procedure is requi::ed for alteration of an existing
which adds or tuilot"l-"nv "1"19:ta-ir"ot axea or 'outdoor
repracernent of J";;;tili9-uunaing shalr be subject tc>
the Plannj-ng ano--Enttironm"ntal Commission'
noxW
B.
c.
ADDRESS
NAI'{B Of
ADDRESS
AUTI{ORIZATION OF PROPERTY O}INER
SIGNATURE
,PHONB -ro4l
ADDITDSS
I,OCATION
ADDRESS
OF PROPOSAT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
E. FBE $100.00 I5C for each property owner to be notified'
FY LINES AIID TOCATION
F.IMPRoVEI,IENTSURVEYoFPRoPERTYSHoI{INGPRoPERI
O}. BUILDING Ai;-ANY iI{PNOVNNIENTS ON THE LAND.
c. A trsr oF THE NAME oF OllNERs,€oF ALL PRQPERTY aDJACENT- To TIiE
suBJEcr pRop'R,ry . ?.r.-- (-,:;l:" ?i=o:^, CL-.ft-,(os""'-)u"'.
!'our (4) copies of a site plan cont'aining the follorving information:
A.Thesiteplanshallbedrawn.onasheet.sizeof24,|x36].a!ascaleof 1" = 2o'; a variation of ti" "rt""i size or"i"lit oluy be approved
by the cornmunity-uevefop*t''t
-ptp"ttment if jusLified;
D.
plus
{
Application to;xterior Alrerarion or noffi.. CCI . nU,"" ,
B. The date, North arrow, scale-and
shal} be shown on the site Plan;
c.TheexistingtopographiccharacLe::ofthesiteinc].udj.ngexisting
and propou.a .o"i6"r!. rrris conairi-or, will only !" T"sYt:d_{?t
an expansion ii"i-*here there is a change of two feet of gradet
D. Bhe location and size of al]. existing ancl Proposed buildings, struc-
tures and imProvements;
name of the ProPosed develoPment
buildings, structures
E. The existing and Proposed Landscaping;
F: The location'of aLl- eiiisting and proposed
and Patios or decks.
buildings), Photos, etc.
f.II. The applicant shall submit in written and graPttic
of evj.den.. b.iot* the Planning and llnvj-ronmental
the proposal is in conformance with the purPoses
and that titE pi"p"sal subsLantially complies with
Urban Design Guide Pfan'
forn, a PrePonderance
Commission that
of the CCI District
the Vail Village
zoning issues
form.
If the applicant is proposing a major change in the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan, ttle proced"ts foi change are noted in
Section L8.24.220 (B).
IV. The applicant'must also submit wrj.tten and graphic supporting materials
that the proposal substanti"f-i' ""telies r:ith the following Urban
Desisn cor'"iii"i.tions sectioi if-A;-;;il Vi]lage Design Consideration'
A. Pedestriilnization
B. vehicl-e Penetration .C. StreetscaPe Framewortc
D. Street Enclosure
E. Street lldge
F. Building Height
G. Views
H. Sun Shacle Consideration
Many of the above items.should'be acdressed in some graPhic means
using sucfr toois-as sketches, simul.aLions, moflels (including neighboring
V. The
that
Town of VaiL Zoning Code for CCI also describes other
the appli.arrt nlu"i respond to in written or graphic
VI . APPlications for' ale onIY reviewed
the fourth MondaY
review schedulet
exterior alterati.ons
semi-annually. They
of May or November.
see Section 18.24 .065
or moclifications in CCI catr
need to be submitted before
For more sPecifics on the
A-5.
o Fo
Date
LIST OF IIATERIALS
NAME OF PROJECT Elevator Addition for Sitzrnark Lodge
LEGAL DEscRrPTroN 58 BLOCKVaiI Village, Fi-rst ntltttC
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Passenger elevator at west'entrance to lodge'
The
to
A.)
following informationthe Deslgn Review Board
BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other T{all Materials
Fascia
Sof f its
Windows
IYindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
FLashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
is required for submittal by the
before'a final approval can be
Type of Material Color
Applicantgiven.
N/A
Stucco white
Stucco whlte
Wood frame charcoal
N/A
Matnl grawel stop charcoal
N/A
B. ) PLANT I\,IATERIALS(Vegetative, _Landscaping Materials including Trees, Shrubs,and Ground Cover)
N/A
BoEanical Name C onrnon litrame Quanfity
' Note: Replace exidtlng landscape.
Size
^ lt
, i-
t.
Botanlcal Narne Coqunon Name Quantltv
c.)OTHER I.ANDSCAPE TEATUPGS(Retainlng t{alls, Fences, Swinrning poole, etc. )
(Please Speclfy)
r\,
box lfi!
veil, colorado 81657(30$ 47e5613
department of community development
Decenber 18, 1980
Bob Fritch
Sitznark Lodge
183 Gore Creek DriveVail, Golorado 81657
Re: Sitznark Exterior Alteration
Dear Bob:
-
...--
Ttre Planning and Enviroiunental comnission on December 8th had a pre-lininary-review session on your elevator proposal and deterrniaed ihat thereuere no 3ignificant fuipacts. The only "orceh of the connunity Developraent
Departrnent is the proposed height of the elevator. I need to neet witlyour architect to determine if a height variance is needed.
Your project will be scheduled before the planning and Environnental
connission on January 26th. After the planning comission decision,the project will need to go to the Design Review Board and be reviewedunder the Vail Village Design Considerations.
Please contact ne if you have any qyestions or conments.
Sincerely,
A. PETER PATTEN, JR.
Senior Planner
APP:bpr
cc: Duane Piper
a-- .-
o p.t. oebPli-cation
APPLICATION !,ORM' FOR i]XTDIIIOR NI'TERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMI'1]]RCIAL CORE I (CCI)
rhis procedure is requir"d-I:T^:l:":?:1?""::^":":ii:::: i:ll3t:3This procedure is requlreq rL'r '-;":;::;"^.o^ or ouldoor patio or
which ad<rs or'"^o""J "lv "1"1?::1-tl::T', "I3".31',!;;-;;-';vi.-w uv
:$i:"::^:i."1,'31"::i"?ii?:llp*i:s, ::ti: ;;-sutiect to review bv
ffi:';i;ffi .i"g-""d--n""ii""*""tal commission'
Ited until aI] information is submittad'
The application will not be acceP
A. NAME OF APPLICANT
"r,o*o4'lb'(
ft 1 .
I.
ADDRESS
B.NAME OF APPLICANT
ooo*ur, [119 d
'S REPRESBNTATIVE
AUTIIORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNERc.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
E.
F.
FEll $100.00 p1-us 15C for each property owner to
IMPROVEMENT SURVBY OF PROPERTY-SHOWING PITOPERTY I,INES
Ol' BUILDING AND eNV-fUpROVEI'1ENTS ON THE LAND'
be notified. :
AI|ID I-,OCATION
i.
i
TI{E
G. A LIST OF TIIE NAME OF OVJNERS OI' ALL PROPERTY ADJACENT TO
SUBJECT PROPBRTY
TT Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following i'nformaticn:
A.Thesiteplanshallbedrawn'o!l.-a'sheet'size_Qf24n>z36I,at-ascaleof 1" = 2o'; a va::iation of ttotit'eet oiz* ot'i"-it *ty be appr'oved
by the con*t"'iti*iitt'*f"prnont n<:ptittmerlL if justified;
,PHONE
o
_)/7-Z/+/4e/<-
Ihi-,-'.r- rbr#, B" - r,.<.A' F-
(. I
U"r-*'?
o
Project Application
Project Name:
Project Description:
Owner Addres$ and Phone:
Architeci Addrsss and Phon€:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:.
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
o^r" '/ 1- 77
DISAPPROVAL
Seconded by:
APPFOVAL
Chiel Building Official
ASpon
- -Vall
Brcckcnrldgc
staamboat
!Vlnttr P.rk
Kalrstone
coppar Mtn.
crartad Bultr
t-70
Bouldcl
Denv9t
RBEWE"STI RENTALS
r | 3tt wEsT srxTH Ar,ENUE . LAKIWOC'D, GC'LC'RI'DO 8O2t I .l3o3l 2ta-r lta
,C4 rry O%,
A a,z,T @ a'aZ"@q
-lh-u t4r4,n/2,@Ph47 % z-*, ft7*
"#-"fu \0t
--tl -.(24,//?/tr" z /6 e,7rF-*fu 4z-a2/-//1a/4/e
,"- -.^ // / ..
.-rz.afu<t ztmH-k. rzarueez uy'.y'
,/,/ '
oo
. J7//7/7
a*,./ /arrZe f 'a-fu-< /-/az/*r-u",f ffi
v
EVb
gIIt
s
{,t
(/1
)f-eis
\
,t\
b{;$i
u 1f\.) >]
S it
I r$
oo
Planning ana fnvirotnta'l Cornnissjon Minutes
l'feeting of 8-28-79
Not yet approved by Board
l'lerbers Present
Jack Goeh'l
Sandy Mi 11 s
Gerry l.lhite
Ron Todd
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
J''lembers not Present
Jim Morgan
Staff l"lembers Present
.hm Rubin
Dick Ryan
r lu*
.lim Rubin expla'ined this item. The Board asked questions. Ed
Drager pointed out that they (the Sitzmark) are adding more
parking spaces than they are taking away.
Mr. Fritch explained that the storage space they are creating
by enclosing the parking spaces wi'l'l be used by the shops and
there wi'll be a connecting door.
Jim Rubin explained that this item is only coming before the
Eoard because of the enc'losure of the parking spaces.
Mr. Fritch explained that the parking spaces they are eliminating
are under used during the winter.
Roger Tilkemeier said the space is ther to be used and they do
not need the parking and he feels they should be al'lowed to do
thi s.
Gerry White asked Mr. Fritch if he feels they have enough parking.
Mr. Fritch said a'll of the surface parking js used in the surnmer.
Roger Tilkenreier made a motion to approve the Conditional Use
Request for the Sitzmark. Ron Todd seconded the motion. There
was more discussion. There was a questions about the difference
between the Sitzmark enclosing parking spaces and the Village
Center's illegal enclosures. Jim Rub'in exp'lained that by enclos'ing
parking spaces, the Vj11age Center is not meeting their parking
requ'irement. They did not have permission. There is also a
djfference in that the Vj'llaqe Center is not in Commercjal Core I.
l. Colrdi!1ona'l Use Request for the Sitzmark Lodge t9 aUow thg
age lrea.
tt'
PEC Minutes
8-28-79--Page Two
Sandy Mills said she feels the Sitzmark can come back at a later date
and ask for more enclosures. Jim Rubin said they could.
A questions was raised about the easement that is necessary. Mr. Fritch
said jt is in process.
Gerry White said this request is based on economics and that is a poor
neason to grant it.
The vote was. taken. Jack Goehl , Ed Drager, Roger Tilkemeier, and Ron Todd
voted in favor of the approval . Sandy Mills and Gerry White voted against
approval . Sandy Mi'l ls feels the basic reason for doing this is economjc.
The park'ing spaces they are enc'losing wi1'l bring in additiona'l revenue.
She rea'lizes he is saying there wil1 be'less cars going through Checkpoint
Char'lie but she does not feel this is a justjfjed trade-off. Gerry White
feels there was no reason for him to vote for it. The request was based
on econom'ics on1y.
2. GRFA Variance Request for Unit 2-B Vail Row Houses
Jim Rubin explained that he did not receive enough informat'ion on thisprior to the meeting.
Ed Drager said the Board feels this should be tab'led or presented.
fth. But'ler representing the applicant asked that Mr. Todd (the applicant)
be a'l lowed to present his p1 ans since he is here and then have the item
tabled unti'l the next meeting. The Board refused to hear anything from
the appl icant.
Sandy Mi11s made a motion to tab'le the item until the next meeting. Roger
Ti'l kemeier seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous.
3. Rediscussion of Proposed Changes to the Aqriculturea'l and Cpen Spacer
.lim Rubin explained that this item was being sent back byfor further discussion. He presented al'l the up-to-date
He a'l so expla'ined that the main reason for this rezoning
an inaccuracy in the Agricultura1 and 0pen Space District
the Counci'l
figures etc.is to correct
Zon i ng.
Ed Drager said the figures are still 'inadequate. He would like to
know how many possible units are involved.
Jim Rubin explained the difficulties in figuring the number of units.
He explained that the numbers are a'l I effected by covenants,'leases,
slopes etc.
Rich Caplan suggested that the maximum number of units wou'ld be the
595 acres divided by two or 298 units.
Roger Tilkemeier sajd the only bu'ildab'le sites are Vail Associate's
Gold Peak and the Go]fcourse.
PTANN${OD ENVTR0NMEI{TAL Cot'f'trSSrON o
AGENDA
August 28, 1979
3:00--Public Hearing
( trllqry{itional Use Request for the Sitzmark Lodge to allow the\-z Addition of 400 sqdare feet of Storage Space in the Garage Area.
2.', GRFA Variance Request for Unit 2-8, Vai'l Row Houses
3.) Rediscussion of Proposed Changes to the Agricultural and Open
Space District
4.) Preliminary Discussion on Potential Annexation of The Valley.
t, F:-[,.a'
i
-'.f :iJl; ' -'"ilf*
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
o
MEI'IORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Cormjssion
Department of Community Development
August 23, 1979
Conditional Use Request for the Sitzmark LodgeAddition of 400 square feet of storage space-in
to al'low the
the Garage Area.
Description of Request
Bob Fritch for the sitzmark Lodge has requested the addition of 400 squarefeet of. storage space. The spaie to be converted is presently being tisedfor.parking, but is not eliminating parking due to thirir bein! six iewparking spaces created by the approved cloiure of the Gore cr6ek Drive
entreway into the present garage.
In.llay of this year, plans for the new entreway were submitted and
and approved by the Design Review Board with the condition that the
one additional parking space that was to be'located next to the trashenclosure area be removed and replaced with landscap.ing.
At that-timq, lhe p'lans were not submitted to the p'lanning and Environ-mental cormission because no "F'l oor Area" was be'ing addedi Accord.ingto section '18.24.065 conditional use Expansion, a donditiona'l use peimit
would only have been necessary if eithei^ Floor Area of Gross ResidentialFloor Area were being added. - parking areas are specifically excludedfrom the definition of both of these-terms. The bonditionai use permit
ig lqjng required now because storage areas do fa't'l under the definitionof "FIoor Areat'.
There were six parking spaces which were being created by this addition.these spaces are not cqtlllarv to 19.24..|90, which prohibits that parkingrequirements for new additons cannot be provided on site. In thiisituation, there is not a new parking reiluirement either with or withoutthe addition of storage space.
CONSIDEMTION OF FACTORS
A. Effects of vehicgl_aflfgffjc on Corrnercial Core I District:
The new entreway would reduce automob'i'l e traffic in the Gore
mal'l^area^by permitting access into the Garages of both thethe Gore Creek Plaza Building only from the ilestern slUe ot
These cars wi'l I be allowed to enter and exist in this garage
having to drive through the downtown Core Area.
Creek Drive
Sitzmark and
the building.
wi thout
B. Reduction of ve]ricular traffic in connercial core I District:
See response to Factor A.
Reduction qf non-essentia'l off-street
See response to Factor A.
!;
The proposed additjon has a f'lat p'latform on which trash enclosures
ii tb lb built. This will be a mirch improved situation from a trash
removal standpoini. -The
new addition wi]'l not jncrease the number of
de1 ivery, pickup, or service vehicles.
E. Development of pub'l ic spaces for use b.v pedestrians;
This proposa'l'does not remove any public-spaces.used by p"d9:!"i11:l-.-.--
fne fitting in of the present gaiage will probably.enhance the pedestr'ran
eip"rj"n."-a1ong Gore breek Drive Soth visiral1y and in the reduced amount
of automobi'le traffic.
PEC Memo on Sitzmark
8-24-79--Page Two
D. Control of delive ick and servjce vehic'l es;
F. Continuance of the vqrious comnercial res i denti al and lic
racterrclastrict so as to maintain t
Effects of noise. odor dust, smoke and other factqrs on the environmeN
orunerc a I UOre stric
lt|e do not foresee any negative effects that this proposal will have
on these factors.
RECOMMENDATION
There are no new uses being created by th'is application. The storage
space should create no detrimental impacts.
G. .Contro] qulait.y of construct'ipnr-1ry:hitectural design, and landscape
character of the area;
As we have stated previously we fee'l that the proposed p1 an to change
t[""!ni""*"V ,iil hav" . be-neficia'l impact on this important corner of
iown. -fi w-tlt vast'ly improve a presently unattractive very steep drive-
bay.
The Department of Cormunity Deve'lopment recommends approval of this Conditional
Uie Pei"mit. We reatiie ttrit the sbecific request is for the additjon of the
iio"ug. area, but do not fee'l that the storaie area can be considered-separately
iror ihe oveia'll changes being considered. The storage area in itself does
not have any negat'ive-impacts associated with it. It actua'l ]y removes two,
of the six iaaiiional pai^king spaces that are being created by the approved
p'lan.
[e, however, request that as a Condition of this approva'l ,.that the applicant
ii"". *itt' ihe ionditions from the Design Review Bbird. The first condition
wis that the parking space proposed to 6e located by the.trash enclosure be
i:.*outo ana rlpra.ui wtit' lindicaping per the Desigir Review.Board Approva'l
ii U.V-t1, lglg. The Second ConOiti6n'was that_an agreement be received
!lvinS the tennants of the Gore Creek Plaza building-access through-the Sjtzmark
diiufi. We trivt not received information on either-of these conditions at this
time.
E
' .---'---\ .' ' '-
\
-- r
Pro!€ct Name:
,'
o Proiect APPlication o
o"r. 5 11 l1s
Proiect DescriPlion:
Own€r Address and Phone:
Design Review Board tl
- I t-t IaO<c'^,. 2lltltJ
,}
DlSAPPROVAL
-o-
0/L(9. 4
Administrator Chiei Building Official
Ff"
a
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thAt RObETt F. FTitCh ON bchA]f Of thc
sitzmark Lodge has applied for a conditional use Permit to allow 400
square feet of storage space'il1im'inat'ing two parking spaces which wil'l
be replaced by six spaces created by c1 osing a driveway' The Sitzmark
Lodge is'located on Tract A, Block 58, vai'l village First Fi'ling in
Connercial Core I Zone Djstrict. Application has been made in accordance
with Section 18.24.085 of the Vail Municipal Code'
A Pub'lic Hearing will be he'ld before the Town of vai'l Planning
and Environmental Cormiss'ion on August 28, 1g7g in the Vail Municipal
Building. said hearjng will be held in accordance wjth Section 18.66.060
of the Vail Municipal Code.
TOI,IN OF VAIL
DEPARTICNT OF COMIIIIJN ITY DEVELOPMENT
fu'r^A,
Jam'es A. Rubin
Zoning Administrator
To be pub'lished in the Vail Trail August '10' .|979
er^l*"L Xtnrr- /L,'zA ,9u* &'*eu'F-' &&;*;"-* tu4"e225'
!"arn- ttr tJd-tl &x^do"t"-;.-",- /"-tttZlZ--
*U ga.A-tl- , Bod /2b7, Ua<-L Ct f,tdsz
't , tt tn f0. ^. t-, t:,0,t !',J4tt"!-, frix xza, l/aUr(OJ- U*u"ao A^U" / /:/2'uL
oLl,:,.-,-"-, - r{)"** {naa"J.l-7--,o^- '* {raV, Po Ua;/-/eod./, Lk,ro
vrajT
,41i6 &.1^, D-tlX, 8* /???, Ud.t, (o 176 s7rtd1
'l'otvN ol' VAIL.
Al)l)LICA'l'ION l,'(.)lt
Applicatlon Datc
publication Date - . f ?i /d q- a
PubLic llearing Date q7
coNl)11'I0NAL, USI P]lltllrf'
Applicnnt StTZ
Owner if different from Applicant
ODGEName
Name
of
OI
lrtailing Address /8a Gon'tr enEE/( Dft
TelePhone +ie TO0
Legal DescriPtion:Lot , Blocli
-j
Ei-Iing
5r K OD 6E
property s unplat ed submit metes
Application is herebY made for a Conditional IIse
ouncts -cription as e it)
P€rstit to all'ow:
1
00
ina Zone'
APPLICATION ITILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ACCONIPANIED BY TEE FOIJ|OII'II{G}I
l.Hearingl,ee-$50.oo+$l.40forEACI{addres.s'edenvelope-
2.ALISToFTHEoI,INEBSoFTHEPRoPERTIISrvithin3Oofeetina
Si.ngle-Family Resictential ; nu"-fotiiy nesiOential; or Tt'o-Family
Primaryrseconaarv-gesiOen!]"1. Zone District; or adia'cent to
tbe subject prJplrty in all -other Zone Distrists-
The orvrrers List shall include-ln. o"r.r of all owners and the
lega1 clescripiion of the properiy otuned by each' Accompa:ryring
this list shal1 be pre-adclressed envelopes along with
certificates and Reiurn neceipis prope.iy filled out to eaeh
;;;;:--it"r"-io"rs can be obtain;d. irorn the u.s. Post of,f,iee-
3. Site PLan r floor plan and othe:i documents as required by the
Zoning Administrator
4.4
ol
u!THE SITZIi{ARK AT VAIL,lNC.
ao x 507
vAlL, coloRAoo 0l657 L434
DOLIARSvz
@9
-rEg!
E6F.
SE1>.J (
PAY
to lll I
oioSF o;
o-TTppIicant
OATE CHECK NO.
e- 7-7?/q7f ;')tu
.riLOlluQl[[ti too ? !1.?r'
'\
I
Y
I
ftI
I
It
I
I
lol'IN oF vA.It,.
AppLTcATION l'otl
CONDITIONAL USE Pltltl![I1l'
Applicatlon Date
Publicat,ionDate . . f'be /a /qZa
Public llearing Date q7
Name of APPlicant StTZ AOPGE
Name of Owner if different from Applicant
rrrailingAddress /83 Gort'tr enEE/( Df7
TelePhone +7 C foo
Legal DescrlPtion: Lot , Block --_-r' Filing
,!
II
I
I
i
l
II
t
5/Tv < OD GE
propertY S unpla.tted su It mete- & bounds
Application is herebY made for a Conditional. Use
scription
Permit to allow:
\
ft)
4oo
Zone District-ina
APPLICATIoNWILLNoTBEACCEPTEDUNLESSAccoIt{PAId[EDB]rTEEFoLLoffiIl$Gi=
l.HearingFee-$50.00+$1.40forEAC]raddressedenvel'oBe.
2. A LIST OF THE OITNERS OF THE PROPERT'IE$ rvithin sOO feet in a
single_Family Residential ; r*"-r;;;iy B.esidential; or Two-Fadly
Primaryfseconaary iesiaeniia,:. .Zone District; or adiacent to
the subject property in all other Zone Districts-
The Owners List shaIl include lnl t"t"* o"f atrl owrrers and the
legal description of the propetirt o*uoed by eaeh' Accompa:nying
this list sfraif be pre-adctrelsed-envelopes-?19"s: with
Certificates and Return neceipis p.operiy filled out to eaeh
owner. rnese-iJr;; ;;; ue oulainio trotn the u'$- Post offiee-
3. Site PIan, floor plan and other doerrnents as nequired by the
Zoning Administrator
4. A description of the precise uature of the proposed use'.its
operating gllaracterisiics and measures proposed to make the
use compatible rvith other properties in the vieinity'
:krsb8
f7
'7n* 1/t
9.
.l
q"
RECEIPT The Town of Vail
t9_
\I
N';' 736ti
DA
RECEIVED FROM
-ADDRESS
DOLLARS S
Permit Nunbers Police Receipt Numbers
HOW PAID-Cash-Check- BY
-f,@
C)
r-{
C)O
luF
Qoo-z
Fo-lllY
UJdl
oF
tr
E
uJc
lLlol> rol1 COI
= \l
v l\lO ..1r\lr-lgulbEzo
z
taYzk
>z
=lJO(L TL
if;
2""r=
-u.l il6d=
tr
UJ
t!o}. IJJ59E<ofo t!1
6YB9tir
cd
F'Jr-
=IJJ-E hEo dEE =*E p69 I r.uE Xo-t :>-ut-aul€=
ulo
oF
---
F
=Elrlo-zoFoDEFazo
C)
tr!n
oz
t
=c
UJo.
l1lrt_,
| 31.| (t,o. LIF| -l<:d -,c
t,P 412
ib pta
c)l
(/'l
'El
El
(l)l
"lol*l
PI
(ul
'l
o
uJ
z
z
!l
m
.6
zz
t; pr?
tE Elg
l0l\r I
Bvue
sg -/ 'v
B;:9t
EgE:I
igEE;; gE FP
E : E.it
!Ea;e*.€ 8 tE
€ csP b
E!teeo_(Uo.-=o=+o!''
€EEs5
:o'.oo
*::sg
tsEsi: -'€ 9d60'-.:-<; o (/) l:
Erlc€
s c lel
iHg;E
EEiEg
|!Jlu
al,
=(ro
oF
Fz
t
uJz
3od
|!UJ6z
.:.3
cEvPg
<F
NOTMlVA
-Jl<l
-l
zl
zl
.. >lo
uJo
uJ
uJzoF
UJ
z
Eoo
:<G-o:
=(iZu-oopa ztn; 9=o Fq
EXo(U
|rl
e.dE.{-tlJAZ=LU.-
I
I
I
ol
=.1
st
5l
al>l
EIol
Pl e
tltltltltlt.ltol| =.1tolI r.rll
t*ltJll<ll>lI tllloltzl>t 3lE9l
z)
ol
rl
al>l
ltlol
zl
d
.lolzl
cilurl
5lil>l
rLlol
zl;l
Fl
olsf
I(o
t\
tltl4-lrd(f)lctolE -{lqltlu.l'-l oltll
uElF-l *lU{ JIt<lGl >l
€|!lloltzlt3lqol
L{J
LlJ
a.t1
a6+)
CJ
-v,U''
(l)
N(u
(U
L
ui
z
(D
-)
N
+J
LU-
rd
F
I
Il.l-
I
I
,)ulIJ'clq
q
J
=o
O
Fz
z
T
uJ
=
Eh
+8,Fo2oo
tr.
UJ
uJ
2P
=#=FJZ(LO
-.r O<FGOuJ<zE,UJF(42o
<oog.fo
.E
t
!trtr
oz
E
=G
IIJo-
tg ri:k roilrll1lrll
I It| .o
=661?dsbE; s
=.e c?€:*EP8:-.= (! - 6FJcXC)
€ gEg =$
g 6 S-3 c
=EPiF: i;;e
E EE
='iEE-F:H
E;;iE
g"; ge icL= - o "oPo-!.9=49:r*Eis
96,!65
:EE H;,
E6 F:=
-o;o::-'€33
.c; (D o c
E,*i t €
: Fi;?
;EH;i
EEiEE
:<e.o
=ZZD-oooh o. Q=XD>Y!r I 6E
aoeZr-(Jo e) 9.1.ezXrJ- <oq iPiicr.:!XIIJ.E ai..t/'J
a
UJ
J
z
Eo
zIF
t
uJ
J
3
IJJz
-l
zl
zl
.. >loul
llJ
uJzaF
(r
lu
)
z
Eoo
uJF
o
UJ
trodto1zo
Fo-
ITJY
UJ
d)
oF
F
:Ic
uJ
TL
u-o
oo
I
uJFoz
z
rn ll>_i
c00
=zfl
a-,P
Jiffan / \ =
=E-=-r -': llJEil>
F
trl(L
l!o
uJ
z
loI
I
IL
Jt-ul-h=
(L llJ
=(LOr!9o
=uJXo-:>UF.
ltl
J
-JIL
ul
c0
F
o
coo
o!t
.E
=F
EoIJ
AO
=l+.
-lD-Ff=ErlP
-ti.=i
E
=E,
UJ
o-zoF
C)
E,Fazoo
n[]tr
olz)
rl
3l
lI-Iol
zl3otH
I
I
I
I
I
()l
Jolutlrcl
Jl
<I>l
ttlol
5l g
Ol r.uFI F'
I
I
cil
=.1oll!l
1l
al>l
LLlol
zl
FI
I
I
I
.il
=.1
utl
5l
<l>l
tLlol
zl
3l
FI=
?lolull
1l
al>l
ttlol
zl
BIolFI
uJ
=zoo
I
Il-l'
I
I
A
HI
cls.J><=E(J
C,c)zt-
=#fFd6
E
F
Fzo
z
T
lrJ
+.b
=IIY
\JZ
<F
lJ.l <zEt!Ft,l z
F
EFzoo
-J
EF
u.l
E
Foult
T
E
<ofirfo
!trtr
I
zs9
=edto
=z=)fde
:gg
sEi
;Hg
E
Elr.F.r-.t|-L!od
.E<
Zv1<\Z
G
P,.
GolrlFhrH=t6FEI&rf
!'l5014 url#l5-l
*^{
6t9JFD-
EoE.atoo
B.1t
Ect
E
Eot
o
q,
e
€
ct!
I
'e)
a,Jfl
)z
Lo
--...-)trDD
l-rFI
-.?
iF;:s
€E gi*
Ig:fF€';=orc9oE9
= 35 e,l
IH
t:
l;
te
JF
-1c
\It;
N;E
><
><x><xx
FFii€f ;sP"'
iE F:E
i!€r.EE (E L=::
- CL.i? t: J
-- c f Cl
E3E;g
gs€:s
Ela;ef;F9e
iE;; F
$ge€g
| | l_lE
slglsl;lglfr
q
1r
zlol
5l o-l !
t!
cE
Jl<l
FI
2I
zl
Q
UJzIo .. >lo
ITJ
l!tuz
U)
=E
u,lq
J
z
EooiFEffi[u,Glrio
J(D
Fo
\
ilcl
JI
\
('z
u-
J<o<3 v,5H
\-
$
\
\
{)
\\l
,i; I
=lzlql
:1"
ilr i
til.l ul
)r'fr9
q!
J<:FEt6
$
J
5il
;l
9l
<,'o
Itt(Jo
F()
IrJ
=()c
EJO<FG(JuJ<zq,UJF0zoo
JE,
5PFO
bF-v2UJO
C)
sF
3Ed5o
G
lJ.t
Fo
DE!
\qqB s\R> l
E-B E E
at.
e
E
I
e
o) cL
_.9.(tcJ tt
c-.3
:t
--:- l! e\ eF--- E I9..ti -.
I .-' !9n -=/a- ?tI--\J-.-t i' :--\ El.'\el\CU\e
2
Bo
j
l:)
t.TrnE =t
ntroe
Flre
tr
tr
{
,
\,
(,
.d
\
\
ots
t
€1r.{tr\
ab!
q
o
V
:*\fo$
\c
\,*
mpoweo t(
Dcolod tl
Hmltt
B
rl
/-O c& <t- *Lu
,^,. ofr{rt'{o
sKt
l-l t''{
'r
Ill I
r
fwrn of va[ CofimuCtY
Oov€bpmont
Bulldf
Validlty ot Perrnit
Sec. 303 (c) 1?02 U.B.C.
Or
PEBMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT INSPECTION REOUEST
rowN ol Ylrl. JOB NAMEDATE
CALLEB
TUES WED THUR PMAMFRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / O.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
FOUNDATION i STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
INSULATION O POOL/ H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
tr
tr
o
cl
D HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
GORRECTIONS:
\
.. ... 1"
DATE INSPECTOR
tffir
oz
E
=euio-
o
O
NJ
@ O
co
(n
IIJ
UJ
lJ-
F
=G
uJo-
c 9 1/'xht z)jtl telt frt
I
rf)l
'\!!
liE-l
\
rdr {
!-lcl
=tE=iot(5
B=
qJ
F
E
Iz
=
zz
o
LIJF
z
z
6Jl
dl
.6
o
=z
1-)
oc
(s .='61?ci
Et, (D
fsE
He*
.E68.p'a a6.> s
:E*F_ Er-. F.8r
= o!_l-;col
I'E ol-ool9NP'F-o 6lrcc;:E-F O:ebE-=
o-!
;95: trE*oo
EH3E ar .cE:O
€3;
oq)tr
=oosEE'I p:)
a:E
5s9oo doc(tti'-i
$iE
EE6'5E
g8
?at
.9o
EEF3E8cL'- anO(lt55
=o;>c9'- o,Ec
O.O
E(!(|)tr
*o
EC
.9'E
E:
cr$
,i(!'- -cq, t'
EC-(!Ei;qrELC
6ct
(!c
-c6-a60
s*85E8o6
tEGE>gIto9a
OEr-o
-()
LT'
stsl
st
@c!o,')
oo
N1
(yl
C!sr
>i
CN
\
E
=
uJ
z6
ao
Y
uJIoz
Jo-
J
9
F
r|J
UJ
(,z
CO
E
o.-
z
q)t!E
UJ
uJ
z
tr
uJ
rue.
E
.D
3g
uJ
z
6qto
F
aaoo-
uJo
z
llJJ()
x
F
uJ
U'
U)
nJ
uJtl-
ts
=G,t!
J
FoF
z
J
o
F
C)|lJJ
uJ
z
6
=Jo-
J
Iz
T(,
urE
F
F
NOrM'rVA
1
P
PL
ro
Ye.-
a=Oq-
5otrcqo
d,'-
?,aoF
Aloc+)l!m2eru.=o'
>E
-ti)f tr,t S
=lo$t
66iro-9XrE90qraz>.Ooo2r!<oqgU
FO.ici
+,L
rt
o
ln
L
,9
{J
E
=o
zo
F
cl
uJ
F
oo
oO@
(f)
-
o-
uJE
J
z
E
zo
F
UJFJ
3urz
tltltltl
tszfz9nE6o<
=Hx,r6o<z
otz,
2=
-ItroIE
uJ
=
IE
at>
t!zYIIF
qJ
2
tr
J
loz
I
-l
I.l
I
;9ttr-l
I
I
--l
-l
l_l
l
l
5
i
Jl<l
trl
=l
zl
oul
ululz
aht
IJJ
J
z
E
(\I
I
F
(o
tr)(f
c!OO
LOr-l
Lr)
UJF
@oo1zo
Fo-
lrJY
uto
oF
l--
CE
IJJ(L
tto
coo
I
lrlFoz
ItlF
o
z
.n9
coo>z
(L u-
2i2
=()i-\-uJ6E=
tr
ut
l|-o+. ul59E5€8E9tt;
EE
=>.=r!-E ifE :9-E U5
9 \ triE Xdr x>t q-
€=
IJJlo
F
E
=Etl|o-zoF()
JE,,
zo()
trtrn
E
o-
(u
-o
a/,
=
tr
I
J__l
7
J
9|
olullal
JI
<l>ltrlol
zl
3lolFI
I
I
.l\l
.l
?lolutlGl
JI
al>l
bl
pl i
(o
@
sfF\
c\l
I
TI
Lr)I*l
olzl
ol
Hl
il>l
t!lol
zl
tlFI
L'
l-)
E
(u
(1'
ro
t/,
=c
II
sr
C\Io
(o
I
IuJlrlcol@l-l
.l
;|
1l
al>l
l!lol
zl
3lolFI
OJ
-.E
c
aI,
ao
C5z.
oJ
:z
F.lF
a,/\
ii
=z
o-)
I
Ixg
-lqau
=+
ea
CJ
:
E
4
(J
!-
o
tlt-l| 'r-lI rott>tztlot .lFl =lGl *lgl -l
rJJl cltcl?l -l
Elfl-\I EI
-l dtq
H3
z
co
=lJo
t-
-8. O
=+El- l-o2
()
JE<o(JF
FS
S?F-,2tro
E
-rO<F0.QuJ<zEUJFa6
o
aotqOrir tlJJO
trtrn
SitzrnarleIndge
April 20, 1985
To whom it may concern:
This letter will serve to inform any interested party thatthe Frozen Yogart Company, which will be occuping space inthe Sitzmark Lodge, will have bathroom facilities availableto their employees and customers.
This company has approval from the Sitzmark Lodge and BreezeSki Rentals to establish a business. The re-modeling plans
have also been approved by the above.
$-z-Jerry Anderson
Manager
JA/si
Sincerel Yr
(^r1., .,
Year Around Res€.rt Lodging
183 Gore Creek Drive r Vail, Colorado 81657 . (303) 47&5001 41"
T t
SPECTIONIN
TOWN OF
',r",. 1 ,' ,,7 l
REQUESTvAlL- /r 12- b.t' -t1
PERMI
DATE
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
/..,/ t t' i: JoB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES WED THUR t6r ,PMAMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
D BOUGH / WATERFRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
APPROVED -
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
/(2.
DATE INSPECTOR
PERMI
DATE
T NUMBER OF PROJECT
JOB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
LOCATION:
IN
o
SPE CTION
TOWN OF
REOUEST
VAIL
CALLE
TUES WED THUB FRI AM
BU
trl
trl
trl
Itrl
trl
trl
Tilr
ILDING:PLUMBING:
FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
o
tr FlYTq;tr FINAL
/L ffi tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
'1 r'r'.L'-/:'i2
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
ev
INSPECTION REQUEST.
TOWN OF VAIL r n
,' 't k'JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:i r 1i I
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
IJ
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VA|L r. rl
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
C ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
tr
tr
cl
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
-
O
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
GTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER
-
ROUGH
CONDUIT
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
O SUPPLY AIR
tr
FINAL O FINAL
B APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED E REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
<t,lttl!lI.
ts
=G
UJq
ccl
|,)!
o
oo
3oF
-Etc
t.gr6iotoD
r.s:o
t:r(D
E
o
c3.
E-o,
o
o.a
ag
3o
o
-a
-oo-
d, or
e€tr6:o)o:@
! E'
:(t::(
lctl
iaDl:E!
g:
.'5 r.€s9!
oEEG
:ictO!';(gQ
-odEEo!Dvce(B
.2 12p6
!|,c'-- o
9g;oGCo 3'oogF.
iELc-E(: ].j
;:1: QllEt
iE{
l€t':}J
o-Ec
66cooo
=@9o
Ef,
:(ts:
Oci
S,D
s='
Eg:i:
591)o i
)Cl'o.
d:EE
s8cv,
-- tt€9,
Esjc\;
Q'G!
=€f:ar
:05
)o5
'
EE
r€5t;€tsE=€roE'Eg
9ofs
E5a!=
-@
i!Ea€i65ra9r
9=l(l'cli5iU >\':tr;;-=-!5s
d ot:oc
lo:0tc:isi
I ol
I Ei| --sI ccI p;
lE.
o.!o.-.!Eur=
E€
Ei;9E
. g'-
C'C€!
- o,,
(!cl,
s€,olEgio qr .':c-lti!IE:.ct q)i
9EciF;
ro
(l,,E
a)(Jo
tgtoq).
o. I
cOrOr
F
oq
llr
z
UJ
(J
oc
o
@
=UJ
u,
z
6ur
gl
uJtl.z
F
UJ
olr,l(<
F
llJ
(,zo
tn
r.ul!
=
q
FoNotlvn.iv^
zIF
-co
=tl'oz
tr
E(t.
&rcri
.'t
9r
zII:o
li|.t\-=>c
(Ar\=l u,-y9
'=
I9SeoFat9oEg3EU'Jec)>C'FO;a{
zo
troo
qJA\io
lrt
J
at
|rJ()
q.|ll
tt--
oz
an
Ez
oz
lU3o
tz
F
ql
F
el lt
.E
o
J
;
Fxul
E
o
le
IE
I u,l
l"l:
J
zo
nl<i
I
=o.,4e it-
H€O(,8
E= O.PHO-E+,J o-- |Ur-r .U rt- E]L- .- rO
55gsI!C'EO.|
o 3'i olrj Ut |tl +,o<L(Ur4J Er- |lrJO' -O- |=E3 E I(ro(uo IHL)F I
s53.3 |
=,it- |O. rts dr Ij'b..: JO +-, r, =.!4*6tiH
---F4F-srl ..
Xnn
€atE.o.
-9o
o.to
bc
=E
Eot
o
q,
E
rg
CIT
-E
-
L/o)
a,Jo
\.1Lo3i
z
oPz4
@o
=zf=
o.- I
F?
gg
dn
oz
J
c!
$J tr-
-; lSFt l-l .-] E
J
t\l
-ltl
| -.-
Ol r'c
it._ot-llrl
5t ^
3f .''
3l "1il vltsl r",l FI FI il
o Inppti.ution NumberA*
j'
Fee
flzo,oo zfu fts
pxi6 &3!75/
Name of Projec
Name of Person Subrnitting
Location of Project c)l
Description of Project
SIGN APPLICATION
Dat
Ertfi;
The fo1lowing information is required forto the Design Review Board before a fina'lSign submittal fee is $20.00.
submi tta'l
approva I
app'licant
gi ven .
by the
can be
Materi a I
B. Description of Sign
s9z
D. Corments
.i *-
Te MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
1. Site Plan2. Drawings sfi6'ilii-9-Exact'tocation
1. Photographs showing proposed 'loca[T6i--4. Actual sign
5.,- Colored scalE-diEiligl
6;.r Photograph of sign
-Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB SubmittaT-
)rgn Aomlntstrator
Sign Administrator
=a
75 south lrontage road
Yail. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7qro
Apri'l L7, 1984
TO: SIGN APPLICANTS
FROM: Tom Braun or Kristan Pritz' Planners
RE: Sign App'lication Requirements
offlce ol communltY development
[hen appl.ications for s'igns are submitted, the fo1 'lowing information
is required
l.Siteplanshow.ingexact]ocatjonwherethes.ignistobe]ocated.
2. photograph or drawing showing the building and where sign is to be located'
3. Exact design of sign (one or more of the fo'tlowing)
(a) sca'le drawing or rendering (must be colored exactly as sign will be)
(b) the sign itself is made
(c) PhotograPh if sign is made
FEE: A $20.00 application fee will be requ'ired at time of application'
kverl
\IJ I
tp,
ll *r..
Proiect Appllcatlon
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone ,rtlC
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecl. Addross and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
. Zone
-
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
$ ar"u Approvat
Project Application
Project Name:
Proj€ct Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Filing
i
Zone
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date ' i, ''.:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
*l Staff Approval
.{|F &Application Number
SIGN APPLICATION
Fee Pa idO......-- / tDate 6////tr{
Name of project (N t//t< t/lttay ftoa^t loo,r ---
Name of Person Submitting tuqC ructt,q/U$ Phone /V6 - 60/?
(r1 n
0 cl0oro,ntl
LOcatiOn Of PrOject jlltN/NC BL& a+prv.* cacano,, o/. /tu<r(4c/ f/a /t<04Lt
Description of Project
Yocua( y' nfpl'tr,t .fofi- n ,uq {f<.
The.fol lowing infonnatrJr_i: required.for submittal by the appl icantto the Design_Reviewra_@Ltqfq^e a finar approvar cii, ue-giuen.Sisn submittal fee A--$r:l)
A. Sign Materia'l
B. Description of Sign ''l,-TAilGuta/L Jfu,JiG,, '////rc- u//.17t
C. Size of Sign
,filZ-L/ilq tz4oZcqtt
D. Cornents
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
1. Site Plan2. Drawings sfi6ii'Tfrg-Eact location9. Photographs showing proposed loca-'I4, Actual siqn4, Actual sign5. Colored scalEliFEvJiE-6. Photograph of sign
Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB Submittil-
Sign Administrator
)
6- L./'r - qt Cu
lvf . 5'y, L
ep.-.f-
-;E
fJt,,u!-f{.= lh
75 soulh itont ge load
Yait. colorado 81657
(3m) /P6-7ooo
April 17, '1984
T0: SIGN APPLICANTS
FROM: Tom Braun or Kristan Pritz' Planners
RE: Sign APPIication Requirements
olllce of communltY devcloPmlnt
be located.
sign is to be located.
l,lhen applications for signs are subnitted, the following information
is required:
l. Site plan showing exact location where the sign is to
2. Photograph or drawing showing the building and where
3. Exact design of sign (one or more of the following)
(a) scale,drawing or rendering (must be colored exactly as sign will be)
(b) the s'ign itself is made
(c) photograPh 'if sign is made
FEE: A $20.00 app'ticat'ion fee wi'l'l required at time of aPPlication.be
1dr6*y
(.over^)
oz
F
=d.
uJo-
c
d:
oo
o
!o
t-l
oo
oo
<\l
o,
UJulu-
tr
=E
uJ
h9-E^z-ot
'6 Lre,.l8 l1.C s
sl
1ir
li";
\l =N!
=r'l' S
I ia;llt 'n| {.o .d
T:E
uJF
F
F
u7z
=
zz
tlill
ilt
g$
tscL 0tt1nf
bq
rq6rn
=o65
.o ,F+otzq
€E
Itrz
=
uJ
F
(\,1(o
@..o.oFo+J J(J
o-..5 P+)
g g(O.d ov)CJ ()(d
@(J
=rL.Ffo+JX(u .o
L DCO
t!J
uJo
i
G
toF(,)
EFz
o
tr
UJz
=o
t!
ul
.E
z
o
o
c)
F
o
o
Y
{,
c(5
q)o
o
o)
.EI
f
d)
E
o
=f,
oo
o
$
3
.g
o
o)a
€,E
Etr.!
ctl
.gco
=r
oE
o
q)
Po
(!
E
()
at)
.9
!
o
E
6!(E
n)
G
o
(!
(t
(D(t
EPr-oR.
^t6.ot,Fl=96o5
5tE>(!='
EFooEo-oQt#5i
-G(oo-
EoPoo-
E=
E.oo_6
EE
CL.E
o'-ae
o!Ef
33()>
:E(6:p6fsEor
EEOo)o(!
-o
o
.9
|l)
Eo(5oc,p
o
o.
,(!
E
o
o,t
(tt
(6c
o
6
U'
D
(U
(U
CL
-9o
o
6
(J()
(g
oq)
-9
Eoo
o,
cr
0)
co
G
E
o
;
.g
Eg
(!
.9
(5
o
E(E
0)
(!
(U
c,o)E
-g!o
.Y
(0
lt(,
11)
il5o
LfF
f.c\
C\I
oo
(\J
o
oLr)
Lr)
\
rr)\
Orc\I
F
=
z
J
.o
-
ul
()z
Jo-
J
o
CE
()
UJJ
uJ
z
o.
J
9z
o
UJ
=
uJ
uJt!zo
F.
llrE
UJ
;u,itqJ
e.zo
uJ
aoo-
trJ
z
UJJ
x
F
UI
<t)f
at
uJ
LlJt!
L
=
IJJ
o-
J
Fo
h
=o
=o
J
I
F
uJJul
z
ao
=
C
z
()
u,.
NOrrvnlvAi ll
! r " lE- r : lE
=stl:rd9!6 6b€
E g 9 a;F 9 O Eg6 6 tr:F! fl-E{ :!
s g gF
F.Ng
z
tr
J
{u-
oe(,
uJ
F
o
r.r)
(7)
tu
z
E
z
E
UJ
J
=UJz
II
zlz
tr
o
I
at)
tsz
o2f
UJ3
q
o
5
IJJE
z
F
=FI
Er
Fl
Fa
.. >loqJ
ul
UJz
at)F
=trul
J
z
Eo
utfJ
(r
utzYIIF
z
tr
J:)az
r-{
ol<
ujla)
ruF(LLL<>og
*1,
<\l \o
oo)!{J
{J(d
+,P(d
u-
(t)
JJ
=F
TL
at
s
c\l
(D
I
c!(\Jg)
F-{OO
IJJF
6
ut
Eooo-zo
Fo-
uJv
IIJ
dt
oF
tr
Eul
o-
tto
ooo
I
IJJFoz
z
oPz4
dro
=z=fa-,P
dfi
2'r4
= uJ -*'idd=
tr
=.E
uJ
g-
Et!6YE<CLf,€EB9rrL
cdE ir
= lu :-E b=o dfi: >o-j ou-E oo9 lurE Xart x>6iiFo'i€=
uld!
oF
II
-
E
=E,
lrJ
o-z9F()f
E,
6zo(J
trt]n
ol
z.l
zl
=lolFI
I
I
.l
2l
cil
,.tl
+l>l
rLlol
il sOl rJrFI F
Icl'-l
crlrol
!Fl
€l
(lJl
"l
-lFt.Fl
3l-1
:aq
E
I
I
I
sElitlo-<lq>l
3
I
:l(l)l
slol
(ulol
'-t
=l=l
I
01
rr-l
Io)l
.Fl!lFl5l-lil
EI
6
=II
6
I
I
I
F
-J
(u€o
od
-.Yr-
a6
N{J
U1
di
z
d)
-)
-a\A
(o
(J
at'
Fo
LIol
(l)lLlol'l
=l(frl
@llql
UJq
CI
CI{J
-
o
o(.)
c
(,
L
r-(u
Lo
=
rr)C!
co
I
C\Ior
el
dlull
5l
al>lttl
9l
FI
+)ago
=
.-)
:t
G. ir
=*[x FOz.-o o
9P
=<=d]Fd5
oF
Fz
z
T
uJ
=
JE<oC)F
F#Yr-\2Eo
O
<F(r(JuJ<zEUJF(42
J<oo9.trt t!
=o
trBD
i
:/
tl
{j
$t
il
IR
.r]
\
_l
t\
t8l
(h
uJ
uJll_
F
=G
UJ
o-
rllltltg-
H#
t1rl!rlr
oF
F|2z
o
J
\
I
I r-..l|.
as
tr
a
\"
N
N
\
\
R
il
)
I
Iloo
s.\.t
I
J
o
eal('{
I
ob
a'
:
q
a
t
ht
I
oo
N
V)
^1
t"q
g'l
c(rl
I
€igii,lfi
Fffi
F
=gJ
o.
z
lo
Y(,ru
a
J
9
F(,qJJ
uJ
z
=f
J
Iz
C)qJ
=
7
uJ
uJ
zotr<iq, I
olutl
>(
o
o
@
3llJ
UJ
zl
uJlol
F
atoo.ul
z
g,
x
F
IIJo
(-
\
.,,\
B
BuJl
JI<lFI9l
(,
=J
=
()
F()t!J
uJ
(9z
J
J
Iz
(.,
UJE
NOrwn'lvA
N
$
u
uJF
J
lr,zulct
66Qs 9Fg.62o8!5f
HgFO
i (\i
s
0=
=0
ile
il=r
lrl
lsl
;i
s
,q
il:
Ig
:lzlol
FIsl
uJlFIJI<l
=UJz
.i 'l I 14r _l-T--T-
z lllE lll: ||t3 =lElcle ;tStFlE
zl
z
oz
lltlttltr.lIPt2l)F6 .,,lFqJt<oloOJ
F='xq.X.i<z
oFz--
9=
d63E
uJIit\i\
uJo. tt>o
l!o
v,
J
3
F
lrJ
iEltf'
iEEgg
-- c f ClE*"ie
eg;:=
E !a:g
;$;;e
{sg'ei
/o
\P,.{
h
\
r{
z
oPzeoo
=z>D
o-- I
,.trtrtr
=l=l
b
=Eujo,l!olurE9E.ctloatEt2EP}E,=cE
=q.=>
(,z
J
r!-ii
=z
o-.!
rl
flzl
FI
tfltzlgfl
sl
JO<FE(JuJ<zEIJF(rzoo
oF
C)
Fz
9
F()
l!
llj
sF
3Ed5
(J
9z
rott
=
o
li'i o
=+E
b oc)
tn**
^.f\'\LJ\*>Q
I5
0,_co
\z-Lo-f
--*)
J
,"*-5>Y2Ef;f
B;E
D
Iu
o-
IL
UJ
o-
F
a9'=cE
=q.=>FdCFct lr,
;;oEolDF
:oo. u{o -,|
ul.ooF
ET
^GF'
uJo
a,
o
9E6zou
=Fo
c
G'LL
==
(!(5
i i i * "=Q t ?= Z=.2 z4 P:Y:::i r
=;:1Elti a = = ab; j_E; i
= [i:4 2
aZ E.=:=
u a -. ll E
::€ E.I .5
E
=; i;:iiizi:
" i.. e. -E i
.:: 4 ...! ii-
* iEEi+i ?:! i ':.E X i 5 5 :il iV v?* ! - i ii -,:j -:iiziili
rjt
or
(f)
L
A
o
oz,
(u
L
lzool-
C)
o
'.I
t!
(vt
.;
U
F
l()I+,
lLtu-
I6l -oc$oolm-t
I
-
!.)
-
=oz
I
z
(Y)
I
(o
(J
L
c,
o
U
:)
ct)
'o
eo
JL
tr
N.P
UI
i,
E
z
a1 !tlrHr^ L- -iYl--<>xo,.,u
-zzE*<<5rza\alJ
z-v>z=,-. - irFeErr>1rr.-Paa Lr) \J- n( r.t--zZUAsJ -\ -':
iF\
<%ca
oE z3F-F-kJ<H:iF<YO;El=z>A><-P
EE*3FFtrQ\,-''l!
tto>i*F?*.-Y\<
HFTF
=UXASZU.-ffi;REriSX-..]_l-YlIfi{r*F(J>l-
rH
F
-e.Itsartitst
tFafraEI
C.
FR
m
F
-.lJatrri.F|+
-H
-af,FaaF
rFl
??r\EY
{-
-:
--11|e
F\
-dLIr-
-trt
*FreHH+n\EY
tt-f
trt
A.rFl
Et+raJfH
ffJrhf
|{e.e
Z;L.-o
SPE
PERMIT UMBER F PROJECT
DATE o
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
c-\\'-'rJ t /zn-,-
wE?@g /o;ad_@)
IN CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
z
PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:t/<
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V,
tr ROUGH / WATERD FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING II GAS PIPING
O INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER D HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
IN
J ,)l't ,?)7-3/2J-
jp-q-r ,'-_\wED (rHUB.l F+tf
' \i---' \--l'
/Ct;Cto @. 'evr
I
SPE CTION REQUEST
TOWN Ot VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:3 /'/(..
.J
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMB!NG:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
-
tr FINAL
N APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
COLORADO TEST CENTER, IN
B NO.
PAGE _1_
DATE:s/8/8s
OF
DAILY REPORT: V
LOGATION:Sitzmark Lodge/
DL Dickmeyer
Hrs. ServlcesReg. O.T. ContracEed Extra
5.0
Servlce
Code
1INSPECTOR
ON
Trave I 4.0
Inspect 1.0
To tal 5.0
Per Duane Stewarts request rvith a general ov-erall inspection of
the added patio and slimning pool steel framing was conducted. A11
nrelrrbers and cotrnections were found to be installed and visually
acceptable. Bar joist spacing, bearing, and bridging ivas also found
to be acceptable. Inspection of the shear stud connectors revealed
these to be acceptable to Al{S Dl.1.
This information was given verbAlly to Duane Stel'/art'
{.0. [{. cotfinttcil0t{ s0. [rD.
MAY 2 0198s
REUIIVED
Structural, Mechanlcal and Materlals Tesctng
_--4-
\\:
_4.
Ope
a
{
oc-o
i
C)
C)
O
-C77
cFoFI
.DcoI
G'oo
May 20, 1985
Steve Patterson,
Town of Vail
Vai1, Colorado
Chief Building 0fficial
816s7
oaloFo
oEog
.eoo
Eoto
ooIt
roxo€
d
B
ooo
o
.€Io
D
.E
E
=!
ot{
.Ec
Jg
E
EEtto5
ge Addition
Steve :
I want to reiterate the items of our discussion in your office
on May 8, 1985. As mentioned in our neetingr Itm sirnply trying
to understand and resolve any questions originating from the plan
review of the Sitzmark Addition. I further want to resolve any
tenitive position of the fire department. To this resolution,
nay I summarize the following points:
1. The urethane insulation being used in the garage area is
protected from exposure by a half inch layer of "fesco
boardtt which has a flame spread of 25 and a smoke develop-
ment of 0.
2. The canvas awning is not specified but is by allowance.
When orderedr we will require that it be rated; fire
retardant.
3. The trash housing interior is in process of renodel with
the replacernent of the sectional door with a rolling
door. Thj-s remodel will be concluded with the replace-
ment of the 5/8" fire rate gypsum board at the ceiling.
While it is not an item of this construction or the Drawings of the
Sitzmark Lodge Addition, I have recommended to the Owner and the
Owner has agreed to place 5/8tt fire rate gypsum board on the open
soffit area of the carport and also on the r+a11 surface separating
the garage from a sma11 work shop at the west end of the garage.
However, the Owner r,rould prefer to leave the Protective sheathing
of plywood at the cooler in the east area of the garage.
The fire alarm system is presently being installed; thls should
satisfy concerns specific to this j.ssue.
Sitzmark
Sincerely;
cc: Bob Fritch
w
/FlF/tt
I NTER-DEPARTI.IENTAL REV I EI{
PROiIECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
COI,II.IENTS I{EEDED BY:
BRIEF OESCRIPTION OF THE
PUBLIC }IORKS
Revlewed by:
Connpnts:
FIRE OEPARTMENT
Reviewed byz .z/:aa
Reviewed by:
Corments:
TOI.IN ATTORI{EY
Reviewed by:
Corments:
Revianed by:
Comments:
DATE OF PUBLICE HEARING:
'f-',";h
/"'*'/ /" €a "n''-^"-'J ^'a/'/'-"
Date:
Date: ,/A'/ 7' sz/
-------
O
Date:
Date:
Date:
4u.
Cmments: t2azre/tzt.u"..! a,.2 OAA 1, SGi-{.-tr -'44.M, " r?.-Ean;e
-A_,-E/-.v y';p.=,A-.-o- 7;s*t;z-xt-/ .*t'/a.c- ue< Z7o3 tu?4tuJ.
,a2-,2:eizo'v
{7
Z7;-:'; ;;::':';'''tr ou::'z 4,'f , lpTtose'rzz *
:4,;*:.::
pSLI;E DEpARTIENT --.:Jrt"i ^' 1/ .-ots"'; 4/"/ / 4.o'z-'/9/":7 y'/a"f^/;z-n
c'
oo',,-plnfaf-.-
OWNER OF PROPERTY
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED
NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRESS
APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT
TO ERECT OR MAINTAIN A STRUCTURE
ON A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-I.IAY
PERMIT NO.
d-. C'"--i)c',,x-
Fence
blali
-y
- pl",nl"r'
\therga,ref>'
I
I ll An,- C,-.\c \".,.,-
o(\
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY TO BE SERVED: B\K(Attach description on separate sheet il necessary
Corner Lot Y...--..--.-..s-Inside lot
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OR ITEM(S) INTO RIGHT-OF-WAYAttachp1ansshowingencroachment,property1ine,sideffi
DOES STRUCTURE ;PRESENTLY EXIST?
PROPOSED DATE FOR COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
meters, po1 ices, manholes, any other affected apurtenance jn the project areaor dimensjoned) and section(s) as well as elevdtions (if applicabie).
(to scale
revocab'l e permit for the structure above indicated,In consideration of the issuance of aapplicant agrees as fol'l ows:
'l ' Jhat the structure herein authorized on a revocable permit basis is restricted- exclusively to the 'land above described.2' That-the.permit is limited spec'ificaliy to tt'" type of structure described in thisappl ication.3' That the applica.nt shal'l notify the Town Manager, or his duly authorized agent, twentyfour hours in advance of the time for commencement of constrirction, ;n orJlr that proper- inspection may be made by the Towr.4' That the fPPlicant agreel to indemnify and save harmless the Town of va.il from andagainst ai1 claims,^suits, damages, costs, losses and-expenses in any manner resultingfrom, arising out of, or connecied'with the "r".ii".-". maintenance of the aboveidentified structure.5' That the permit may be revoked whenever it is determjned that the encroachment,obstruction, or other structure constitutes ";;i;";;;; destroys or^ irpii"i g,"use of the right-of-way by the. publ ic, constitutes a traffic hazard, or the propertyupon which the encroachment, obitruction, o. ti"uiturJ'exists is required for use.br tpe pub'lic; or.it may be revokeJ at aiy-time;;;-;;y reason deemed sufficientby the Town of Vail.
6.
7.
That applicant will remove, -at his expense, the encroachment, obstruction, orstructure within ten-days after receiving notice of any revocat.ion of said permit.That'in the event said removal of the encroachment, obstruction, or structure is notaccomplished within the ten days, the iown is h"ruuv-irih6rized to remove same andappl icant agrees to reimburse ine rown for the ;o;i"o;-;;;d removar. The Town shailhave. the ri ght to make an as-sestent-ata.inst irre-i."p"rtv'.rd col'l ect the costs of removalin the same manner as general tu"ui ii" col.lected-That the permit so jssued is not Jisignaut", inJ-is issued sol e1y to the undersignedapp l icant.
That. the applicant has read and understands all of the terms and conditions set forthin this appl ication.
8.
a
10. Special Conditions:
-t
DATE
Si gnature,
Approved:
f ,jo'int owners ip, shown bo
DATE
gnatures
.;
.r*
DATEDirecto@
Director of Public Works
DATE
Fi
isN
ffi
gr
e/7< z
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
-/-^ J ,1ssla (; -.f - r { JoB NAME
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON TUES WED THUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
E
n
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERO FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
"d noucn O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n
/r'O SUPPLY AIR
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
Io,t i"
I
'7
c-STtt'PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
INSPECTION
, TOWN OF
!'l't. 1 i
REQUE
VAIL
<-- /. ,\DATE " ,rJ u JOB NAME/
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES
BU!LDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
11.ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
.{f t4-. Az'7 tzt/ zr.u,. t= "'1' a /-'?z +' -, "'n '.;'
/
,'' ":.al ,/Z'
INSPECTOR
'^.
,./ : 'l ..'- r
i '\-{ ,/ )I la\t(
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
-
JOB NAME
rNs
I
PE CTION
TOWN OF
.r'
REQUESTVAIL ' ,t
.l;C; I
AM :'ry'j
l-t l-i t:.,
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR
.l-\
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
E FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORREGTIONS:
ISAPPROVED EINSPECTION BEOUIRED
_- -'i-i(-DATE ) '* J' c.z - t1 .l rNSPEcroR
-l!7,14
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOB
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
INSPECTION REQUEST- TOWN OF VAIL
. -l " r i./ tf lt'.
PMAM
TOWN OF
BUlLDING:
N FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
D
n
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRlCAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n
D SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FIDTAL tr FINAL
/21
'ffiiAoveo tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
sarc 1.-z z - 15 rNspEcroR
lry-*:)'
INSPECTIONIoyf gF
o
L
uEqr
t'
RE
VAI
<--"
PERMIT NUM
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
E.PROJECT -----d\t ,o, *or.E T z,t,t,r
CALLER
TUES (
\ .i?t ->€t t\tl
THUR
'4
FRI
aAM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
B
D
tr
!
UMBING:
o ioullonroN / srEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERO FBAMING
o
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT
n
tr SUPPLY AIR
n
tr FIML tr FINAL
z.'t
PROVED tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
PERMI
DATE
lNSPEP"T,,|_ON,
,1 1i' i i'-i ft flr
REQUE$TVAIL : .t
READY FOR
LOCATION:
NUMBER OF PROJECT
TNSPEQTIO,N:
JOB NAME
MOry.WED THUR FRI
CALLER
TUES
a
PMAM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
O FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
11 ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
tr FINAL D FINAL
ELE
trT
trF
OC
o
MECHANICAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB
tr FINAL
PROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
t-t I t*.
oor= € 'l o -'(../ rNSPEcroR
-
PERMIT NUMBEB OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
ECTTON REOUESJ
TOWN OF VAIL : ,t
*
NSP
I ''/ ,, i.
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
BU
trl
trl
trl
ol
trl
trl
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUNO
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
O HEATING
tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
ffi
I
TNSPECTTON REQUESJ
TOWN OF VAIL I
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
. JOB NAME
THUR i-FRI ,I
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
T] POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr
tr
o
tr HEATING
B EXHAUST HOODS
O SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
i,7 I
INSPECTION REOUEST
VAILPERMITNUMBER
" /,,
OF PROJECT t
t
5
TOWN OF
OATE
.lCALLER
TUES FRI '''"' ' .,,,,,-*,- AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR
BUILDING:PLUTIBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
FOOTINGS
I] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION o
o
cl
POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL O FINAL
.g-APPROVED
CORREGTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE
rffii
o
NSPPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ECTTON REOUESJ
TOWN OF VAIL
LDATE
CALLER
TUES ,AM ;;READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR FRI
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUNO
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr GAS PIPING
tr
tr
D
tr
POOL / H. TUB
FINAL
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
.:'ffnppaoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE
//'INSPECTOR
/(-/ 4 )/ /A t--tNSPECTTON REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL .'
.\', i/ z:' 't'//l/,< ,- ,,t r,', /! |
5
CALLER
NAME
INSPECTION:Mo\ -, T!:I-ES ,, WED THUR FRI AM PilREADY FOR
LOCATION:
PERMIT NUMBEB OF PROJECT
salE ,//- (' -'('a ne
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
OOTINGS / STEEL I:IO7C2/78 tr UNDERGROUND
T] FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATERtr FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION O POOL/ H. TUB
tr FINAL
tr
tr
tr
o
tr HEATING
B EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
/,' '/- l.// - ,. - i......
-
m
DATE INSPECTOR
I
PE'/d.t
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE I '2.r., -l/ ,:lif JoB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:(aD TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
r_r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT E SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
OVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
''/t.:"
DATE INSPECTOR
I rl'1 1IILL'"INSPECTIONTOWN OF
REQUE$rVAIL I
t
PERMIT NUMBER PROJFCTOF
,\ JOB NAME ---- ' t 1' "- ,i .. '-.
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:,-.MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PMAM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V,
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
D INSULATION tr
D
!
POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr
tr
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
E FINAL tr FINAL
,[neenoveo/ conRecttottS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE
. ..,INSPECTOR
t
PE
PERMIT UMBER OF PR ECT
JOB NAME
l
I ) i i ,,.'
INS
THUB FRI
cTroN REQUESI.
TOWN OF VA|L I
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLER
INSPECTION:MON TUES
IAM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
ELE
tr1
trF
tr(
tr
MECHANICAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr OISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
I Q z-t
REOUESTvAtL t.PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
INSPECTION:
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
/{lI NAME
MON
/4:\
'UES wED i$..)eIBJJ\--..
IAM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
Ll.fts/ro,
BUILDlNG:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING tr ROUGH /WATER
o
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H, TUB
MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER B HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
D^rE 4'/?49 rNsPEcroB
o o
PErNs CTION
TOWN OF
lir.i'r /, r\f[
RE
VAI
(tl
ouEsT.
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FBI -------@
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
BU!LDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.FOUNDATION i STEEL
FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
OOF & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
FINAL tr FINAL
tr
B
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER 3 tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
.F-APPRovED
CORRECTIONS:
tr OISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIBED
DATE INSPECTOR
I qL>
PERMIT NUMBE'T OF PgDJECT -
oorc "? 2 -t f/5 JoB NAME
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
;.. yt^ i; _ /r -(
REQUE$TvAlL ?.
AM GN
CALLER
TUES WED THUR t!l''READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
,
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUNDn rdbrtrucs / srEEL -
trFOUNDATION/STEEL \ trROUGH/D.W.V.
FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
O FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
C] ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED
CoRRECTIOI.{S:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
\i -i-r . .'\I. - V ...':y' ': /l -) II 't i Ii ' V (./ INSPEC}-TION REOUESTp -T=oWN br vnrr_ , r.ECT TOWN OF VAIL.n,,ll) .toB NAMF / 'l !r . .. 11 "ll, ' l'rr /; , .t-l I , 'aD^rE 1l>L/,li JoBNAME---_ ,'/.]r.r.(+jt I)L.,/,{5 JoBNAME--_ / J il ,,.f+:',. - 11'l.,,,.t-.rl,o<
1 / /,' . /; | .,r' iltl' 't i l' '' /' (i 1ALLER i , ,...( ( /l,i -- (i._(= ' '\-i i,,i-.!(.1I'READYFoR|NSPECT|oN:MoN,fij6)WEDTHURFB|-AMPM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERD FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEEB
" PLYWooD NATLTNG tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
0dSHEETROCK NA|L tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr o
tr FINAL tr FINAL
/'i;6eRovED tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
-7vJ5 INSPECTOR
/ /J,?r
PERMIT NUMBER OF PBOJECT
tNSPECT|ON REQUEST
TOWN oF VAIL i'
.(vs-)
oor, /t/r.r JoB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES WED THUR
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEEB" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
/*=or,*o ,/''J'2 a'i /:
tr EXHAUST HOODSROUGH
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
OVED
,
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
tSg?i;c,zt o t/
INSPECTOR
/ /J4'
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
INSPECTION:
INSPECTION REQUE$T
TOWN OF VAIL I
a
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
6o-ru) rues
:t,/tc,ry,i rce
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
n
UMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D,W.V.
BOUGH / WATER
GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
n
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr BOUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n
tr SUPPLY AIR
D
tr FINAL tr FINAL
-4 APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
lk-zt
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
INSPECTION:
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
j.q,4-/
REOUEST
VAIL t'
JOB NAME
MON
t/
CALLER
TUES WED THUR
tAM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:" (-,.'t!&
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEEB
" PLYWooD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
_o
l'l ',i A TNSPECTTON REOUESTrowN oF vAtL i,PERMIT NUMBER PF PROJECT
DATE II
*l
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON ,FRI )
i'l (i(! ) L
,,AM (_ fM
CALLER
TUES WED THURREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
{:ry'::.ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAT-,
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
/ CORRECTIONS:
\.tt ,1 ,--l I
I'l ,A '^
PERMIT NU
,. i
tDATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
tr DISAPPROVED
THUR FRI
I
INSPECTION
TOWN OF $fsuE9r
CALLER
TUFSJr:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATEB
O FOUNDATION / STEE-
D FRAMING
r_r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELE
trl
I&F
tr(
tr
tr HEATINGTEMP. POWER
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
!'neenoveo,,/rl
CORRECTIONS: _
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
ul 2 L--
PERMIT NUMBER OF PRqJECT
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON TUES
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
t-,"it'i-'
REQUESIvAlL t'
.,1AM (_P_"ytREADY FOR
LOCATION:
li{rtrn' TL.lt tEl\yrLtr,FRI
D^rE 'vi (' i i' \
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
EI FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION .tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED E REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
t
INSPECTION:
} NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
t
INSPE
i/.t
FRI./
---' , --t z'lt I(--, I !
crloN REQUES
TOWN oF VAIL l'
-----@M @READY FOR
LOCATION:
F PROJECT
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
u
tr
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGBOUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
Fr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
t-'l .
J*rr* tr F'NAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr
tr SUPPLY AIR
r]
tr FINAL tr FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
oerc f'-?F4 rNspEcro
oerc F 4o.i5 JOB NAME
t
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VA|L !'/'^ --
-9rf t *;n,:f -.t'
CALLER
--F:\MoN r1!9s t wED rHUB FRr
-
AM d),READY FOR
LOQATION:
INSPECTION:
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
O SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
Y
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
l:12 z INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL I.PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB
CALLER
INSPECTION:vor'r (-iulp WED THUR FRI AM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
O ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
E FOUNDATION / STEEr-
tr FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
E EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D FINAL
'-rSlapp66yEp tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
COBRECTIONS:,g' y'.-. y'i',-., tg- ',.r' ,,"u il?
DATE INSPECTOR
-
1
JEBFr'S|BLEY PLUMHT*I tNC.
I 040-A 5s. nN STREET..MNTRf{. @.8164s. pHOrI An.StinP.0. Box 340 llinturn, C0 81645
0ctober 4, 1985
6
i
I
Town of Vai'l
Inspection Departnent
75 South Frontage RoadVall, C0 81657
ATTN: Gary l,lurrain
Re : Ra1 ph Lau ren po'l o
Dear Gary:
This is to certify that all
Polo Shop has been installed
specifications submitted to
Shop
the work at the Ra1 ph Lauren
a
according to p1 ans and
the Town of Vail .
JTS/sh
cc: J.D.t{. Corporation
P.0. Box T
Basal t, C0 8l 621