HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 7 BLOCK 6 LOT 5 LEGALDesign Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 97O.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Kelton addition
Project DescripUon:
5,18 sq.ft. addition to single-family residence
Participants:
DRB Number: DR8010009
OWNER KELTON, ARTHUR M., JR
225 WALL ST
225 WALL STREET SUITE 210
VAIL CO 81657
License:
01/10/2001 Phone:
APPUCANT PIPER/ARCHITECTURE, LTD 0Llt0l209l Phone: 949-7074
Box 5560
Avon, CO
81520
License:
1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAILProject Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Lo6tion:
LOt: 5 BIocK: 6 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 7
210109205006
BOARD/SIAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
Melissa Greenauer
Clarke Brittain
5-0
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approval: 03l2Ll200t
Cond: 8
(PUN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the Design Review Board.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: g5O.OO
mil'[,ffi
Questions? Call the Planning Staff at 479-2t38
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
GENEML INFORMATION
This application is for any project requiring Design Review approvai. Any project requiring design review must
receive Design Review approval prior to submitting for a building permit. For specific information, see the submittal
requirements for the paftlcular approval that is requested. The application cannot be accepted until all the required
information is submitted. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and
Environmental Commission. Design Review Board approval expires one year aftter final approval unless
a building permit is issued and construction is started.
A. DESCRIPTION OFTHE REOUEST:
LOCA1ONOFPROPOSA1 LOT: 4 BL1CK: (r' ru1re:VALVrl-LoC€,-l*h'B,
C)
D.
E.
F.
pHysTcALADDRESS: l/a+ .{-ls/vft,<TAts€ ctFcL€
PARCEL *, I'LDI A41 'Oftllkmtact Ease Co. Assessors ffice at 970-328-86.to for parcel #)
TYPE
trt
H.
MAILING ADDR6S:0
'.-./y'l.t--en
owNER(S) SrGNA
NAME OF APPUCANT:
MAIUNG ADDRESS:
Construction of a new building.
Includes any addition where square footage is added to any
residential or commercial building.tr MinorAlteration - $20 Includes minor changes to buildings and site improvernenG, such
as, reroofing, painting window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
DRB fees are to be paid at the time of submittal. Later, when applying for a building permit please identiry
the accurate valuation of the project. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according io the poect valuation.
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPUCATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
OF REVIEW AND FEE:
New Construction - $200
Addition - S50
MME OF OWNER(S):
ffCEIfDDJfitr:.CI2M
Questions? Call the Planning Staff at 479-2138
MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS.AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
GENEML INFORMATION
This application applies to changes made to a site or exterior alterations of a building. Any
alteration in which additional building square footage is added will require an "additions"
application.
I. SUBMTTTAL REOUIREMENTS
n Photos or sketches which clearlv convey the existing conditions.
n Photos or sketches which clearlv convey the proposed building or site alteration(s).
! All relevant specifications for the proposal including colors and materials to be
used.
n Condominium Association approval (if applicable).
tr If the intent of the proposal is not clearly indicated, the Administrator may
determine that additional materials are necessary for the review of the application.
BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffrts
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
DoorTrim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting
Other
LIST OF PROPOSED MATERIAI-S
TYPE OF MATERIAL:
N/4.
ly4 0\)4 L,l,\Y
a€a>{,o&al'\
(tltt\C>
COLOR:
wk-@x,\
A?\utuua (s-(,tst,\
,Frprt uFo,t-
!I ,/el.,
* Please speciry the manufacturer=s color, number and attach a small color chip
** All oderior lightng must rneet the Town=s Lighting Ordinance 12-11-5J. If o<terior lighting b propced,
please indicate the number of fixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identify each flture type
and provide the height above grade, lumens ouFut, luminous area, and attach a cut sheet of the lighting
fixtures.
GENEML INFORMATION
Applicants requesting the review of additions which require the utilization of an Additional Gross
Residential Floor Area (GRFA) (250 ) request must also submrt a Planning and Environmental Commission
(PEC) application. If the addition requires an Additional GRFA request, the applicant must receive PEC
approval priorto Design Review Board approval.
I0l4'N
_D
/U,+ E
a--
Y
Questions? Call the Planning Sbft at 479-2t38
ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Qnc complete set of existino floor plans or "as-built" drawings with all specifications
shown.
A preliminary title report, including schedules A and B, to verify ownership and easemenb'
Condominium Association approval, (if applicable),
Photos of the existing structure.
Specifications of all materials and colors of the addition.
Tooooraohic survev, stamped by a licensed surveyor, at a scale of 1" = 20' or larger, on
which the following information is provided:
tr Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information must
be clearly stated on the survey so that all measurements are based on the same
commencement point.
O-." Lot area and if applicable, buildable area.
E/ tegatdescription and physical address.
D." Scale with a graphic bar scale and north arrow,
E==- Property boundaries to the nearest hundredth (.01) of a foot accuracy. Distances and
bearings and a basis of bearing must be shown. Show e\isting pins or monuments found
and their relationship to the established corner.
tr Topographic conditions at two foot contour intervals unless the parcel consisE of 5 acres
or more, in which case, 5' contour intervals may be accepted.
tr Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diarneters of 4" or more, as measured
from a point one foot above grade.
n Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittent
str@ms, etc.),
tr All existing improvements (including foundation walls, roof overhangs, building overhanqs,
etc.).
tr Hazard areas (avalanche, rocKall, etc.), centerline and edge of stream or creelq reguired
creek or stream setbacl! 100-year floodplain and slopes of 40o/o or more, if applicable.
tr Size and type of drainage culverE, swales, etc.
tr Exact location of eristing utility sources and service lines from their source to the
structure. Utilities to include:
Cable W Sewer GasTelephone Water Electric
n Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals on site or in the right-of-way, I adiacent to the site.
/,t n
tr Indicate all easements identified on the subdivision plat and recorded against the property
as indicated in the title report. List any easement restrictions.
tr Spot elevations at the edge of asphalt, along the street frontage sf the property at
twenty-five foot intervals (25'), and a minimum of one spot elevations on either side of the
lot.
27 Three (3) cooies of the followino:/-,;gy'td--/tr Site olan, at a scale of 1"=20' or larger, showing the following information:
tr Existlng and proposed layout of buildings and other structures.
D Location of landscaped areas.
tr All new retaining walls with spot elevations for top and bottom of wall.
tr Location of all required parking.
D Indicate roof ridge elevations with existing and proposed grades shown undemeath.
tr Floor Plans, at a scale of 1/8" = 1' or larger (114" = l' is preferred), clearly indicating the
proposed addition.
tr Buildino Ehvations. at a scale of 1/8"=1'or larger (I14"=l'is prefurred).
tr If existing structure is proposed to be modified, show elevations of existing structure.
n Building elevations must be shown, clearly indicating the new addition. If building faces,
existing or proposed, are at angles not represented well on the normal building elevations,
show these faces as well. Show all rooftop mechanical systems, if applicable.
D If the intent of the proposal is not clearly indicted, the Mministrator may determine that
additional materials are necessary for the revhw of the application.
llgD |n rltlrtil 80r
-t --^---GtaStrbll lra ta,aal? rltl rodYrlt? qD lt6!7
,t^ /h ./'\ ./JA
?o|lE.r. D_402
Sara J' Flaher
ior-:Iil0J-rtoo lr.
T'HIS DEED OFTRUST (Sgildty lulrum€{t") k mrdc oo
Irthll I. Llts itr., lnileldrrllt
f8oarwof), $c Pr$lic Trntc* nf rql.
rirrir.li oi trrii
wtfuh & rrgneed ild ofiisliFg utdct thc h*t of thr
rddrcr* is lt frll Lrilr vrtl, go tl65?
t'om nilm rlmr lmllrl$ rfD rc/100
('LtndoC). Bormr ovc* Lcrdcr ths prildpd rur of
Dollers (US. I aloroOO.Otl
.Itb d.t[ b Ed'lolccd by Bsrrr*crr ootc dargd thc f,irotc due rs rhir se{r|lit! tmrroFoot fNolt'}'*lfo! protdd3r
F-5S? e?./O?.196 l2:54P PG 1 OF I- Eaele'County Clerk & Recorder
REC
46.U0
DOC
ll|.rrJrLr.Tfb U: ho hu&g llrlrl
.mqtloSrdor.
DEED OF TRUST
.ttttnlt ll, 1916
itrt. ol &Icr|6o
Coluru tTrurodL d rh. bsbirrti
, rldilhodc
{\
V}
ilt"tift F]-"ni.'r *hiito fii$ doti. if ac'. pid-*rlicr' d'.r *:d-p7r!ls. .* , ,ry.]''.,i?t|r,, ..r'..rt l-ttr '- '--;;it ddtt "tll""""r by rls l'lo'e' *[h idcrd' rd r[Tfftr Socgrity Inrtnmst fllgutco io Lentec (e) rht rupoyml -ak--r --r.-;TJ;:#ilffi;;:f,Hri.'* "f tnl trt'ro; 1ir)-rhc prymcnt tf S .rhf rurnq '*ht-hotod,:11Y1.*tEttgr|'atfq
pilmErn0h ? ro p'dcd th|. sccurity ot thitt lresurfry. imtg'n'::Tl rnt lci t31 ry.:1T-::::--I-Ti,5t.-TmffilF#;.'.'il;Titilil;fr;#""l'l1il-tth"ir,{;F;,'t'r':;"rF?.rd:"::ll^*nY-{.5g.*3fiT; ffi;'j;;*;il ,rrmr end mrvrya ro Tru 0$ ia ri nr. sfit pntr uf *ah, ths to[6drg d.ncr50d-ltop.Ely
..-L- ,---idi-
locdcd in ,l|eb eF'C:oatrrb
l.it. !r llo:t 6. vr'.r vlll.g. lrtr.tt flltg, ddUt| of I'glt' f]i't' ot
Celerrdlo -
,'1, 6r r\. ... ,r4|,,Yt B. J{)!
I,lf tF#';e,f, ?*{iiT,S;;I,"llr?f"H$f i.lrffi ffifr$.lttrffi:ffi il"fr ,ffi;F"#ruffi ffi H
ffiffiffiffi,frtr$ffiffitu*fiffi'ffi-Hffiffil;: ftffiffis
ffiffi:ffitrffifT$S-WSf$..''dil{Iit'ffi1r E!' bncirs uv ar rr
'rsrs
ro .tw ''''co
*r.'' n''*'" fiffi*
ic*rua" tlaS? {-ProPcrlyArldrctn'}i
l?jpcl*l
CC$"-SE!:srteairil$.F$f h./FreaoiMrcu rroF lr|litRu$qnf lJfdAH
i![{F€e!"I vri,! r,, | ' '{\r,i ],.,}i-rd:fi1 rrrqs?,.rzar (_1-{ l-, I Ffr s r/rr
06Il &+o] ( rr'l o''ir ' '(-' ts$clt rtE l-t' ti/!l
tlgt6
-
trc.tr'fl.r a-]tTl l>lHd-]rq llA77 !) ItrA2 '7T 'kHr
;
SCHEDALE A
L
if'lrrlar Mrrft.fia.. atEdt tFcn
1
I
LEGAL DESCRIPNON
Lc! 5,
BTock 6,
v#r, wtlrAGE sgcEts?s Fttlae
couury oF gteLE
sglIB 09 ColO_anDA
E'd Effi'{b}-llI I I lxl-{\1?lq LL-II7!? Tt tT'7T'uHf
SCEEDULE A
0rder Nunher: liotzsaa
L Weclivadate: Desenber 12, 1.996 at 8100 A.td,
2, PaltqotPoticiestobe*sued: Amoawoflwurarce
(tt) A.L.i',ti, Ottinar',t aErtrrrdedi $
Proposeel lruured:
b) A.L.T.A. Loan {E rteadad)
Proposed hwvrul:
lTDSlfIDltf
^d
VDTfr
lcl t tgaL)tlt.tttu
Propwed lwured:
$ Jlz,ooo.oo
3. The estate ot intetest in the land described or ftferred to in thi9 fuwnitmext and covered herdn is
tea elagle
4, iirie to rirc fac a;inpie etiaie or iilreresi in saiii iawi is ai ihe efreciive dare h*eof vettui in:
.lPlF IIr3 lf- Errrgptf-. Jf,.
5, Ihe lawi'refpnad to in dtis C'ommimenr is describqi *s fotlaws;
sEE rfrAclisP &gcAa pEscR{srroil
Pa4lot9eii Mdress:5I}iflEffigIVT'OT' CTIARGES
Iltree drwg* are dne atd payable b$orc a
Poliq can be issaed.
z"t E6s'ofl TllTl l>HM?lc. |*|".]fiT 22 TtFlT'7T'|.+lf
SCEEDAI,E B
Sectlen 2
Order Number: 96o7zsao
EALEfIIUND
The noliet or nnlidc-t tn hc itsttazl. will crnlain crcpttti.ont tn thp fnllnwint nnlp.rs thp smnp nro dLrnntoi nf tn tha'"'r" .t a l - -
mtisfaction d the Gofiryffil:
i. Rights or c'aims oy partie.s itt po,Jses$ion, not shown iry the pubiic recorth.
2. Ea*ements, ot claims o! easernents, not shorim fo the puhlic rea nd,s.
3. Dlscrepancies, coffiicts in baandery liiles, ihortage in area, sntoaclune4s, r*td wty faat which d carrect
iur've! ufut alLtpccatura uJ Ltte pt zfurict wuutu u$cautt uful wruLTa &rc (ta4 .tfuttYra ay 6 c p{t) c recurun,
4. Attt lim, or riglt to a lien, for senices, trqhot ot fiaterial heretofore or heree-fter rt$niEhed, itnposed bv law
ard not slrownby the pblic recordi.
e rr lc- -,- t! --.-J, tteJecan, t.etir, errc:dtfior4fics{, u(ystIi ciauia oa' u,ftei i 4,tstt, aJ ufryt tre.$€<4, J.rEt aaplt6tnnS ut tfig ?artJata'
records or attaching silbi€qasfit to the Secti,"e dule hereof, bttt priot to the date the proposed insured acquires
o! record for value the ettste or tntetest or tnortgage thereon covered b,t this consrtitment.
6. Unpalertted minlng claims; rerrErvations or qcceptions in paterrts, ar an e$ atdhorizing tha i$silance thereof:
water rigHs. claimr or tltle to wat€r.
7. ),ay rnd all urp€.i.d talres ated alaelsfrerbl aad any uaredeeded tdx sare6.
a, rhe ec-t-cce of jaeiuejonr & aey garr,erai ot epeeific taa6:r doEE drvaacy. tize
ptoBectTon r goll congsrrra tjon or o tlrer d.i,etr!.cE ot iscluslfl la al;r rater
ecrl'l.ce or rtreet ,l"aaroyeqaat erea.
9. negerrat lons or exceptiolre conbaincd in O.6. Eatetta, or ia Acts arlthonizing
fh.. +ddrrFvr.ra l.hF'',^f - r..1.t*ltF.7 l*Eat Ur.. TaAG 4.n
'l'r.'L
Ot Ft D}'?A 74,F, r,'d,o',t!ta rrd
1, Rtgbt.g of t&e propric bor of a veia or lode bo ex9ract ard renorre hie ore
alrerefrom anit 2) rigiitr oE vdy Eor ditchae rad crnals coortructEd uader tlc
authority of bbe tt:tj eed States.
'i.d- '"r€€ear.te , :ee tric biop,a aad rl,ghta*of -waye ag glrorn o:e tlre plat o.f 1/lail 9iJIage
.9evea r EIIlng, recozdgd Decgg,bes 77 t 1965 aa Eacepbion No. 702780.
!1 , fatfig, condiLioe,a, ragervatJoae. testrieiioar er;d obiigatioaz es sorieia€d jn
Cortclerrtr fog Vs.r,l vtTTage 9eveath E!.77a9 rscorded Dacem.bar 17, 1955 Ja Sook
J87 aE ezge 575 rg Apseptios No, X,02778.
t2, A Detd of fnuse dated .Tdrruarf 23, 7996, execlube'd by ertiu? id. reltoD jr,,, to
!,&c pubt-ie Trvlte-- of Eagie County, to secure an .lada&tedee aa of $45rJ ,0OO . AA ,
ia Qavot ol Flrahgat* of Va71 recogded trebruar? 7, 1996 Jn los* 687 aE Pzga 522
as .RedeJrtion lvo. 5835?4.
frtll t*q'lfrS .l44T,Z:Z TEBZ'ZI'}+lr
SCHEDUIE B
Sectlon !
Order Msnher: s6or.2sga
P,EgArwil{ENW
The following are the reqilirenents to be complied with:
Iten (a) Paymetzt to or for the accout* of the grantorc ot noftgagors of the ftil contideralion for the estate or
iater+st te be inxured.
Item(b) Properins*unw*{s) aeatingthe estdteorinterest tabetnnuredmust beexesttedand dalyfiledfur
recctrd, to wit:
r. tfoisE
F'd €EA'A|.I ?-llT I t\HM?lq LHl.2!7 lffiz'7I'l'HC
. *r+t*rt***t'tt ttt rt Ittt,tt*tt*a**f *t*t+,i**i **{rf ttf ttttf tt*,af ,t,}t f a,t|t *+ **,}*t{r*t*** *f ,t*,}* *,trt{, **rt,}r,*{ TowNoFvAIL, coLoRADo $ar€o€ortt**tll**l**ttl*tt**tttttt*ti*:ita'h*rl*****'l*t****ttt****'t*tlt*****ta*****+a:t*ritatr'a*l**,tt**'t***'ia*
Statement Mlnbar: R00OOOO353 Amount: $50.00 OL/LI/zooL}3:04 pM
palanent ltethod: Check rnit: arARNotation: 4155
Permit llo: DRB01OO09 Tgre: DRS - Addition of ORFAParcel o: 210109205005glte AddreBs ! 1034 IIOT,IESTAKE CR VAIL
IJocation I
Total Feea: S50.00
ThLe Payment: $S0.OO Total ALL tmts: $50.OOBalance; $0.00t*t'lat'llf*tittlt*l****trlrli*tlr|'|****t*tt***'*'it+'if!tttaf******l*t*lr*t******l,irt*+t+**'t**!t:t*{r*****
ACCOI,JNT IIEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current pmts
DR OO1()OOO3II22OO DESIGN REt/IEl.l FEES 50.00
TOWNOFVAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970479-2138
Inveshgation->
Will Call--->
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON TOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALTSFR BUILD PERMIT Permit #:802-002'1.
Job Address: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 1034 Homestake Cr Applied . . : 02/n/2002
Parcel No...: 270109205006 Issued . .. : 03/13/2002
Project No : Expires. ..: 09/W/2002
O$INER KELTON ARTHIJR M iIR O2/28/2OO2 PhONC:
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIL, CO
81657
I-,icense:
CoNTRACTOR BOI-,ES CUSTOM BUII-,DERS, INC 02/28/2OO2 Phone: 910-926-3202
P.O. BOX 425
EDWARDS, CO
84632
L,icense:168-B
APPLICANT BOLES CUSTOM BUILDERS, INc 02/28/2002 Phone z 91o-926-32o2
P.O. BOX 426
EDWARDS. CO
8L632
IJicense : l-68 -B
Description:
REMODEI-, KITCHEN, OFFICE AND IJIVING ROOM. NEW WINDOWS A}ID
SNOWMEIJT DRIVEWAY ADDITION TO HOME
Occupancy: R3,u1
Type Construction:V N Type V Non-Rated
Valuation: $108,725.00 Add Sq Fe 100
Fireolace Information: Restricted: Y # of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas t ogs: 0 # of
Wood PelleL
S0. OO Total Calculated Fees-> S1,293 -40
!DEPARTMENT oF coMMtrNIrY otutt:oflL,[\.x.-
-)3
C(\<- c+ , qL+ E-
$0. 00 Additional Fees--->9?s - 00
910.00 Total Permit Fec----> $1,368.40
S0.00 pavments--____> S1.368-40
Building----> $7?6 . 00 Restuarant Plan Review-->
Plan Check--> Sso4 .40 DRB Fee---------->
90.00 RecreationFee----------->
53 . 00 Clean-up Deposit------>
TorAL FEES-----> 91.2e3.40 BALANCE DUE-->s0. 00
Approvals:r€e'm: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENI
O3/O7/2OO2 CDAVIS ACtiON: AP SI]B'IECT TO FTEI,D
INSPECTIONS
Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMBMf
03/L2/2OO2 bgibson Action: AP
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENI
'!
I
PAGE 2
Permit #: 802-0021
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
as of 03-13-2002 Status: ISSUED
Permit Type: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Applied: 02/28/2002
Applicant BOLES CUSTOM BTIILDERS, INC Issued: 03/73/2002
970-926-3202 ToExpire: 09/09/2002
Job Address: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL
Location: 1034 Homestake Cr
ParcelNo: 21.01.W20500,6
Description:
REMODEL KITCHEN, OFFICE AND LIVING ROOM. NEW WINDOWS AND
SNOWMELT DRIVEWAY ADDITION TO HOME
**in&****************#************************** COnditiOnS ***!hh*r***********************:i************
Cond: L2
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQU]RED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
Cond: L6
(BLDG.): SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND
EVERY STORY AS PER SEC.310.5.1 OF THE 1997 UBC.
ftem3 O55OO PT'BIJIC WORKS
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning
and subdivision codes, design review approved Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INST,ECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOI,'R HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:OO AM - 5
PM.
Send Clear-up Deposit To: N/A
OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
APPLICATION WILL NO']
\
TBEA..EPI;X
TCIVNOFYIN
75 S. Frontaqe Rd.Vail, ColoraEo 81657
Contad Asessors Office at 970-328-864O or visit for Parcel #
Parcel #2l ot Oq z-Os- o o 6
rob Name: lQll-" /vs,rl,.._o :on']foras: l,o 3+ Horo*/- C;""L
Legal Des$iption Lot:5 Block:6 FitinsS)7 subdivision: (/,, ( l/, ll^r-
owners ruame: /Jri- lfr-l[o"Address: ior+ Hon o,,/./r, Cn.'"o""' 476 s+ rt
Architect/Desig nt R." an,J, Li,-,Address: t48a l),-n C. lol'l G,Jt 1ut Pnone: ?iQ .7 oj +
'nn'n"o'kw [a"k"h t",,W'*"P.o u. +stiiJigusdT'n4? $?/
Detailed description of work: Rn--"&J k;t-t,r^,
Snoru-rl l.d, c)r)ac,,.^, - nr,^, p--<,, onl con,,-nl, /t*n
WorkClass: New() Addition(p Rehodet(>d Repair( ) Demo(y) Other( )
Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both ()a Does an EHU e,rist at this location: Yes ( ) No 94
Type of Bldg.: Singlefamily QQ Two-family ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commerciat ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Unats in this building: / I No. of Accommodation UniE in this building: 62
Nofl-ypeof FreplacesExisting: GasAppliances( ) GasLocs( ) Wood/pellet( ) WoodBurning(l)
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No (Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No g{
COMPLETE VATUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (Labor & Materiats)
BUILDING: $ EZZsO ELECTRICAL: $ qooo OTHER: $ ,r4 ZfO
PLUMBING: $ (oO@ MECHANICAL: $ 7Zq rorAL: S /O87Zg
REFLTND CLEANUP DEPOSIT TO:
CONTMCTOR INFORMATION
I
I
General Contractor:
bJ, C-L- b.10,-. L,.Town of Vail Reg. No.:Tl6s-R Cpntact and Phone #'s:
J^ Z,el,aL, qz6SzoL GIqD+tl*t
Contractor Signature:
't*********** ****-'***r{***********A*FOR OFFICE USE ON LY* **,r ** **** ******rr* **:F*** ***,r *** **** **:..t
:;4
, :.:r
F:/everyone/forms/bld gperm
ERS{ : ErgP 6PtO*t
Pozzi Distribution-Denver
Brad A. Wright
(970) 4813394 Cellular
(970)871s799 ffice
(970)8716798 Fax
QUOTE BY: Brad
SOLD TO: Boles Custom SuiHelE - Jemy pfierson
0210 Ed$/ards Village Blvd Bl01
EDWARDS, CO 81032
(97o) s?s.3202 (e70) 926-2078
PRGIECT NAME:
REFERENCE:
1 1,2,3,4,1s,20,2122
RO Size: 72112X'150 112
OUOTE ft
SH|Pfor
8AW03675
Kelton
1034 Homestake
vAtL, co 81057
(970) 904-0589
Kelton
lnitial Bid 1/14
Mull Main ltem
ehd Stack Mull/ CasemenUGeo
Stralglttllne/3rx2h
Job Site Mull
Eli: Whlte / Cle€r lnterl
Sash: White
511 JE., Sll Revoal 6 11/16 Jsmb Wrdth
Folding Nail Flang€ & Dripcap
PEV t.t.1?rPDV 4..O 02/13/t'|)
LlltE
No.
BOOK CODE
DESCRIPNON
ul{tT
PRCE
ilTENDED
PRICE
RO Size: 721t2X36 ffiI
Sorb: 'Uf = 1'
cm6:'e21
Clad Multiple Casements / Awning 2-Wi<te
Insulated Wet lntsrior Gtz
Loi/ E Annealod
No Ljtes
Ext Whlte / Clear lnterl
Sssh: Vlhlte
514 JE, Sll Reveat 3 3/16 Jamh Wdth
N0 Exterior Tfim
Ste, Ste
No Screen
1-2
RO Size: 36 1l2X 114 1t2 Clad Str8lghlllne Insesh / Redengte
lnsulsted Wet Intefior Gtz
Low E Annealed
No Grllle
Ext White / Clo6r lntcri
Sash; White
5/4 JE, 5/4 Revcal 3 A/16 Jamb Width / No Exterior Tdm
Slationary
NO Harlvrarc / NO Insect Scrcen
Casement Dctail -9edc: 'llt. l'
qr-1?$_U-w .ft <t?tsOl)( e Al dtrnEr *d fo,r ojGfh,)P€{E1o'7 (lhtt uu r,tid b clElgo.)BAW03E75 - l/lS/z)m - rO38
, fRt)l I ,BRAD TJRTGHT FAX r.E. : 9?@?1.6?5,8 Jan. 18 mZ lttffi,,t F5
UNE
No.
BOOK@DE
DESCRPIION
U}IIT QTY
PRICE
EXTENDED
PRICE
1-3
RO Sizs:36 ltzx 1141n clad Straighttine Insash / Reclengle
lnsulaled Wet lnterior Glz
LouY E Annesled
No Grille
Eri: Mlte /Cle€r liled
Sash: Whlte
514 JE, Sll Reveal 3 3/16 Jamb Width / No bderior Trim
S:tationary
NO Hardwarc / NO lnseo{ Screen
Casemenl Detall -
1rf i I'
2
RO 9ize:
5,6
321r2X661t2
Mull Main ltem
Clad Stack Mull / Casemcnt
Stralghtline / 1wx2h
Fac'tory Mull
E:d; ltVhite / Cleer lfiteri
Sash; White
514 JE, Sll Reveal 6 11/16 Jamb Width
Folding Nsil Flangc & Drlpcap
Pev 1.t.127tPOV 4.4 (?J1'3tgt'gc.le: l/ll - ltt
2-1
RO Size: 32112X4E ln
Scrlc: l,!f t 1'
cc324g
Clad CasenreouAu,ning / Casemont
Insulated Wel lnlerior Glz
Lorrrr E Annealed
No Utes
E)d: l /hite / Clcar lDteri
Sash: White
5l1JE,514 Revael 3 U16 Jamb Wdth
No bderior Tdm
Slationary
NO Herdwarr / NO Insect Screen
2.2
RO Sfze: 321nX18 1t2
g(FL|Uf . t'
c43218-11
Clad CesemcnUAwning / Awning
Insulat€d Wet lnteriof Glz
Low E Annesl€d
No Lites
Ext Whfte / Clear lntcri
sash: whlte
514 JE,514 Reveal 3 V16 Jamb Width
No E!ilerior Tdm
Operating
Wht Unison Hedware / White Screen
3 7,8
Ro Size: & 1n XBB 1f2
Mull Main ltem
Clad Stack Mull / C€semont
Straightline/ lwx 2h
F€c{ory Mull
Ext Whitc / Cleer lnterl
Sash: White
511 Je, 5/1 Reveal I 1 I /1 6 Jamb Width
Folding Nail Flange & Dripcap
g€fq i/r . rn PEv 1 .t .127lPDv 4.Q (1zrfi1l, 9V117 1 $gntl
.f.l?, W _ -1,1.127 t a. aO OU?n \( !rF: Al drainns $rr|'d fom crnri,!6.)P?{€z0l7 (Ptbe !t€ ub5n bchrgc.)BAUm675 - lfi 8/2002 - 1025
FRtilt : FRnD LRrGF{T
$1
RO Size: 6A 112X481n
SFls: 1/1" - 1'
FAX NO. i 97efl?1,6?9a Jan. 18 2AAZ fii5l6fr'l p4
clad MultiplE Casements / Cas€menl 2'Wide
lnsulated Wet Interior Gtz
Lorrv E Ann€eled
No Lites
Erd: White / Clear Interi
Sash: While
5t4 JE,5l4 Rareal 3 V10 Jamb Wktlh
No ExteriorTrim
Sta, S:ta
No Screen
UNE
Ho.
BOOK COoE
DESCRIPTION
UI{IT ATY
PRICE
ECTENDED
PRICE
3.2
RO Sfze; 60 1nX18 112
Scal!: l/f c 1'
cA3018.21
Clad Multipl€ Casements / Awning awile
Insulated Wet lmerlor Gh
Low E Annerled
No Lftes
E*: Whlte / Clgar lnleri
Sash: lMlte
5/4 JE, 5/4 Rer/eal 3 116 Jamb Witfth
No Ext€riorTdm
Openating, Operating
Wht Unison Hentv€r€ / White Scruen
1
i{ I DOOR
RO Slze: 75 1/8 X 83
CNGPDT6O6S
Clad Nanonv Gliding Patlo Door / T\ o Panel
Inoulated We{ Glazed / Tempercd Low E
No Grille
Ext: l /hite / Clear hterl
Sash: White
514611118 Jatnb Wilth
Foldlng Nsil Flange & Dfipcap
Ststlonary/Lefl
ABsembled
White Screen
Sir€le Point Handlc Set Antique Brass Hardwarc
021578
PEv 1.1.127tP9\l44 ('t2t13to1',
$r.gZO.3B 91.C/6,S
510
RO Size: fi112X601//2
cc3060
Clad CasemenuAwning / Casement
Insulated Wet htefior clz
Low E Annealed
No Lites
Ed White / Clear Inleri
s€sh: White
5ll JE, 514 Rweal 6 11116 Jamb Wrdih
No Exerior Tflm
Letr Hand
Wht Unison l.lsrdlyare / While Screentuun.t.troou*,r-T) *rr.ur, , *rr.r,
r1?.m-1 i127t4.4b lr rfrl!(Mtc:A! dl*iig! d*d t'qi! cjtdl!.)Pagc 3 of7 GAb3 ri! neiacr b d|uga.)Mtl\{867s - 1/18/2002 - 1025
FRO'1 : tsRAD URIGHT Fnx }{o. | 97Ae?16?ge Jan. 18 W2 !,1,t5?Hn E
LINE LOCANON
No,
BOOK CODE
0ESCRIPTPI'l
UNIT QW EXTEilDEDPRICE PBCE
all
ROSize: W1nX60 1n
SCaL: 1/4' = I'
cc306G3
CIad Multiple Cssements / Casement llMde
Insulated Wer Int€rior Glz
Lovv E Anneeled
No Litcs
E)d: White / Cleer lnteri
Sash: VVhite
511 JE, 514 Reveal 6 11/16 Jamb Wrdth
No E$€riorTrim
Lefl, Sta, Righl
Wht Unison Hardware / White Screen
f$t 1.1.1/ilPDV 4.O (m3M)
sc.fe. 1/.". r. PEv 1.1.1Z7tpDV 4.$ (tzlso,t)
712
RO Slze: 56 1nX60 112
13,
ROSize:34 1l2X61n
cczffi-2
Clad Multlple Casemen{s / Cas€meril 2-Wide
lnsulated Wet lmerior clz
Lor., E Annesled
No Lftes
Eli: White / Cle€r Interl
Sash: White
5t4 JE,5t4 Reveal 6 11116 Jamb Width
Folding Nalt Flenge & Drlpcap
Lefr, Rbhr
Wht Unison Hardntarc / White Screen
(DrM) CC3666
Clad CssemenvAwning / Casement
InsLrlated Wet Inte.ior Glz
Low E Anneel€d
No Lheg
Ext: Whhe / Clear tnteri
Sash: Whlte
511 JE, Sll Re,veal 6 11/18 Jamb Wdth
Folding Neil Flange & Dripcap
Stationary
NO Hadware / NO Insect Scresn
PEV l l inF'DV 4,.!p (t213/Dl)
RO Sfze; 68 1tZX66,V2
(DrM) CC3ts66.2
Clad Multiple Ca$ements / Cescment 2-Wide
Insulatecf Wet lnterior Glz
Low E Anneel€d
No Lltes
Ext Whlte / cbar lfleri
Sash: White
511 JE,5l4 Reveal 6 11/16 Jamb width
Foldtng Nail Flange & Dripcep
Lefi, Righr
Wht Unison Hafttu€re / \Mtlte Scre€n
PEII |,1127[PDV 4.4 (12t13{}tt
Scal": l,L' r ll
.F, tz fi _1. | 1fl 1.40 (12 l?01t (l&G: Alftryit|!! lrsrd fo{ oid@.)PagE 4 of 7 (ftiqj ft ndiact to d'|gi.)BAW3675 - t/rE8002. tO:26
FROM : BRAD I,IRIGHT FRX NO. | 9@7L6?g)
CNGPDToOTO
ciJ ruanow efding Patio Door/Two Panel
heulated Wet Glazed / Tempered Lot E
No Grille
Ext White / clssr lnlerl
Sash: White
511811t16 Jamb Wdth
Folding Nail Flange & DfiPcaP
Siationary/Lefi
Assemblod
White sceen
Single Point Handle Set-Antique tsrass l'lardware
021584
Jan. 18 2@2 Ltt5lgtt P6
10 16
RO Size:75 118X87
LINE
I{o.
BOOKCODE
DESCflPnOil
UNIT
PRICE
EXTENDED
PRICE
Scrlci !8" . 1'
PEV l.r .rtlFDv 4.]o
11 17
ROSize:21 112X42112
Sc.h l/4' . l'
cc2u2
Glad Casement/Awnlng / Casement
tnsulated Wct lntcrior Glz
Lou, E Annealed
No Lites
E il: White / Clear Int6rl
Sash: Whne
5l1JE,5t4 Reveal 5 11/16 Jamb Vt/idth
Folding Nail Flange E DfiPcaP
Lefi Hand
Wht Unison Harclvrare / White scr€en
FEV f .1.127IPDV 4.A (2t1*1t
12 16
RO Size:48 112X421n
H.; 1/4. I'
cc2e2-2
Clad Multiple Cesemeot3 / Casemenl z-\rlfde
lnEulated Wet lnterlor Glz
Low E Annealed
No Lites
E't: White / Clear Intefi
Sesh: White
511 JE, 514 Reveal 6 1 1 /1 6 Jemb Wdth
Folding Nail Flangc E DriPcaP
L6n, Right
Wht Unison Hatd$,are / Whitc Screen
PEV 1.1 .127lPgV 4.O 02/13r0l)
13x
RO Size: 160 12 X 66 1I2
Mull Main ltem
Ctad stack Mull / Casernent
Stftrightline/3wx2h
JobSite Mull
Eri: White / Clear lnleri
Sash: WhitE
511 JE, 514 Reveal 6 1 1/f 6 Jamb Width
Folding Nall Flange & DriPcap
scafs:rrf,.,o twl'l'1nPDv44o--'t'*' t,tgt,- J . t*
q. 1n g J -1 -1tua r0 112h3t01,(Nob: Al lhriE *{rd totr.i$idq}Pt 5of7 (Rirc t.G dnid b dtntlg.)P,AYI (|675 . t/18r2002 - 10:26
FRO'.I : BRRD URIGHT
13-1
RO Size: $ 1l2X 18 ln
ScCar lrf . t'
FAX m. | 97AA7t6794
Clad Muhiple casemenls / casement 3'Wide
lnsulated Wet Interior Glz
Low E Annealed
No Lites
Ext: Whlts / cbar lnteri
Sash: Whiteg1 JE. 514 Rweal 3 3/16 Jamb Wdth
No ExterlorTrim
Sta, Sta, Sta
No Screen
Jan. 18 2@2 1.Lis8Fi"l P?
LINE
No.
BOOK CODE
DESCRIPTK)I,I
UNIT
PRICE
EXIENDED
PRTCE
1}z
RO Size: 61 1nX46 il2
S.elc: l/{'.
cc3248-2
Clad Multiple Casements / Casemonl awide
tnsulated Wet lntedor Glz
Low E Annealed
No Lites
Exb Whiie / clear lnterl
Sash: Whitc
514 JE, Sll Rerreal 3 U16 Jamb Widih
No EderiorTfim
Sta, Sla
No Screen
cA321E-21
Clad Multiple Casement8 / Awning z-Wkie
lnoulated Wet Interior Glz
Lovr E Anneahd
No Liles
Ed; While / Clear lnteri
gash: White
5/4JE. 5/4 RevealS V10 Jamb Wdth
No BdoriorTdm
Operatlng, Sta
WH Unison Hadware / White Screen
1e,1
Ro Slze: 64 112X18In
I:..-,."..,. *.ir ',. , -" ":I
Sc€ls: l/4' = t'
cA321&2{
Clad Multiple Cesements / Awning 2-Wdc
lnsulat€d Wd Interior Glz
Low E Annealed
No Lites
Ext: Whtte / Clear Interl
Sssh: Whit€
5l1JE, Sll Reveal 3 U18 Jemb Width
No OtedorTrim
Operating, Sta
Wht UnFon Herdrvare / White $creen
wlII fi-1.1.1V t r.0 (12'.'3t0ll (ib: Ald*l!t i|td tornoubi4.)Pago 6 of 7 (Rba 16 f|.iiedl' dF!s)&qtm3675 - 1118/20@. 10:28
FRON : RRD I.RIGFIT
13.5
RO Size: 32112X18112
FRX t€. . 9W7L6ES
Clacl casement/Awnlng / Awning
tnsulated Wet lnterior Glz
Low E Annealed
No Lites
Exfi While / Clear Interi
Sash: Whiteiil .n, gn Reveal 3 3/16 Jamb Wldth
No EfedorTrlm
Op€rating
Wht Unison Hadrvare / White screen
Jan. 18 2S@ 11:5SFl'l PB
ti - -:-i
t!
1....,."..... . i:
S(.L: 1rf * I'
LItG
No.
BOOK@DE
DESCRIPTION
UNIT QTY
PRICE
EXIENDED
PRICE
cfu321&'11
cc2412-2
Cl.d nrunipb Casements / Casement 2'Wde
lnsuleted Wet lntorior Gle
Lor/v E Annealed
No Lltes
E & White / Clear Interi
Sash: Whitoii ,rc, Sh Reveal 6 11/16 Jemb width
Folding Nail Flange & DdPcaP
Left, Rigtrt
Wht Unison Hardyr,ane / \,vhite scrcen
PEU lttnpov A.tD (1z$tsll Ff9.37 I __$1937_
14 21
Ro Size: 48t2.x421n
15 25
ROSize:24 1t2X72112
cc2472
Ctad CasemenVAwnlng / Casement
lnsulated Wet Interlor Glz
LorJv E Annealcd
No Lites
ExL Whitc / Clear lnlefi
sash: White
gl4 Je, 5t4 Re\real 6 1 1/16 Jemb Width
Folding Nail Flange & DriPcaP
Lefl Hend
Wht Unison Hardware / White Screen
ftv 1,1.127p.Dl, 4.4 (tzlsol)
tl6t ; Uf -1'
S€ili: l/f - l'
18m
RO Sizs: 64112X54 1n Cted Multiple Cascmcnts / Casement 2'Wide
lnsulated Wet Interior GE
Low E Annealed
No Lites
E)d: Wtite / Cloar Interi
Sash: White
511 JE, Stl Raneal 6 1 1/16 Jamb Wdth
Folding Nall Flsnge & DrlPcaP
Left, Right
Wtrt Unison Hafilwsre / White Scr€en
Pat 1.11271pOV 4,lo 0z',l3pl)
cc3254-2
Not€:
Plea6e vedry all size6, quantities, pricir4, and sperifications before placing or&f. This is a conbEc{. All OdoE
will reqire a signature befure order is rdeased for podtction.
l{dTdal; $11,821.20
SubTdrl; nl,gll.2ll
TOTAL: 121,821.4
.d27-O-1.,|. lznl,a0 (lzlit00 llS|! Al drdnr vilrd nom qfi&.)Pagc 7 of7 (ftbe re rnitol b .tats.)8A!'[O3675 - l/18/20d2 - 10:3
p
9Pfin
$il
2>
Ory,Eul*U) F' t\>4.1
(fi rt)CI0tUH;-O Ii?*?
$y>s
HPS?>rf)yg
b!
tl
+
p
V
Ullto0_z1
6fxtuul 0{ t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I' t-'oiZiErblx:ultrtn IUY IF= |<o if6 i
"l
ZoL
\
ut
_]
trJ
IF
:f,o
(n
F-tn
i,\$
IL
.,,QFU
I!n/v!dX
,.. rqJ t\tl\ vo<dl
s7./
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,l
\JFv(]
ttlr\
(flZztr{CIfxrxuot
ulrFUoZ
lrl
tuzol-
d)
trlz
roz
F
(J)
xjul
I
Ut--
f
oF
TDzo6
oJ\
tlt
Z
I
l
$
Zt'
{z
10i
lLrfih tr U LlY an ui dl. JF rItr /\+-t; Ptrl> ts-I ;i.I rh t- \I Z>!I ZrtriiI RrZ)| 62cI rllu1 qoi
NIj vqf
I tQ:I Uu
) L)z'| 7- 6<| )>{I - [rz| 5a:I rilI Zrfi(I tAI <di1 > Zt'1 &HtI ulx,I >:i
I ut$!I F l\i g9i
Zo
-
(
)
tu
_J
ul
IF
MoZ
I
o
3
Zot
trJ_l
ru
FI
ul
FROM :UALS}I ENUIROMENTAL, LLC FRX N0. t9?@ 24L 43t2
Euvi:,onnrental Sciemio and Engioocrs, Inc.
February 25,2W2
Mr. Jim Ziclinski
Bolcs Cugom Buildpre, Inc.
P. O. Box 426
Eagle CO tL6[]2
Subjcct Asbesbs Inryectiott
1(84 Homerab Circlc
Vail, Colorado
Feb. 25 2@42 @4.48F;n Pz
-d)Ll
WAISH Projcct No. 502't{10
Dear Mr. Zielinski:
\\ralsh Envimnmcnal Scicntists and Enginccrs, LI,C (WALSH) pcrformed a limitcd
asbcrbs inryeotior at a residence at the above-rcferenced addrees. Tbe inspection wu
limitcd b 0rrcc main work arcas. Maerials located oruide of tbese work arcas may
not have bear inryccrd or sanpled during this $rrvey. The strucore is woo&framed
with dr5nuall and woodpanel interiors. The objoctive of thir inqectiot was to ideotiff
tlre locatim and extent of asbestoEronaining materials (ACM). Ten butk eamplcs of
variors $spcct materials were obbined ftom the site and zubmiUed n an independent,
NVL{P acctcdircd laboratory for polarizcd ligtt microscopic (PLM) uralysis.
WAI.SH corrducted thie asbestos inspcction in apcorduce wittr fre Aebestog Hazard
Emerge,trcy Rasponse Ast (AHERA) pmrccol, which is mandated by Colorado
Regulation No. 8 and EPA regulations.
Faron L. Cornptor, a Colorado and AHERA cenified asbeobe inrpecor inqected thc
strucrtrr€ on Febnrary 21,2N2,- Tlrc inspcction rwealed over 5,000 sqrarc fcet of
dr5rcrall with asbcaos+naining joint compound, and 30 square ftct of asbestos-
coaining linolarm iu thc hotrse. Identified ACM uas in goodcondition at the time of
the inqection.
Linolarm bacldng is considered friable ACM; tlrerefore, it must be rcmoved prior to
condrctiug any dcmolltion or renovation aaivitics 6at will disuub thc matcrial. Ttrc
lioolcum murt be removed by a ccrtificd asbesbs absrcment contractor and bc diposed
of a.s ftiebb asbattoe-containing warte.
N*ftiablc &rywall joint compound presant frrilgbort the horse was identified b
ooain O% b2* chryscile asbeebs by poluized light microffipy. The cmbined joint
oompor.r.nd and dr!'ca[ oontains less than 1 % asbestog; thetrfore, occording to a poliey
sta@ent lclcasd by the Sae of Colorado, the mabrial is not regulaled by Colorado
Regutadm tlo. S. Tte drywall maerial may bc diryomd with ccutruciion dcbrie as rcn-
asbesbc coDtoining westa.
Wcrtenr Slopc Divlrbn:
255 Msin Str€r craod Junction. C.olorado , 81501-7803 . Phonc (9?0) 241.4636 , FAx (97o) 2414312 . wdshonv.com
Cononte Offier:
4888 Pcarl E*st Circl.. Suite lO8. Bouldet Colorddo. 80301-24?5 . Plronc (303).14}'1282. FAX (303) rl4l{357
FRO',I :LNLSH ENUIROT.GNML, LLC FRX Ml. ,974 24t 43t2 Feb. 25 n@2 @4i49Fl1 P3
Renolal of maerial drat ontains any amount of asbcsbs rcquires compliurcc with
OSHA rcgul*ions fornd at 29 CFR 196.1 101 during demolitior activitics. Tb. asbesbs
war identificd mly in a sample ftonr tlrc hallrmy to trp downsairs bathroor. If drywall
in this arca ic dfuturbed, OSHA r$lattons will gorem tbe cdrk, These rcguletior
rcquire r€ryirabry pro(odion and air rcnibring of the *orbrs. IYALSH can help fic
@ntsacbr me€t &ese rcquir€mofs if n€eded
Plcare call me at (9?0) Ul4X if lqr brve any qrre$ions o this rnqrb,r. Thanlc yur for
selecdng WAISH for 1uu projecl
Sinccrely,
-/-//t/l/
g?,zo'^J h. ry6w
Farm L. Comptsr
Certifted Asbestoe Inpector
Auacluncntr:
Asbests Sanpliag Forns
Asbesos Certiftcatiqrs
Irbontor!' ADalytical Resllte
CDPIIE Dqruall Folicy Sarcnent
Cluinofqrsbdy forn
Ibt&
WrUSU odd.d tr l[lrcrldln h 36ordaoc rtl .trrrtd pr€fr.dmd pntu ftir ucrr"-'r wlffibrbr4lfo
toadd d rlrbr hrfrcd htb Eport. No dLr qlq d rltlrr rm oodcFd fuitg dttu hrcr€*n. e!tE{V
recdlc 11cor rtrc itdld; lb&rt, il ir Doce:bL tbt ACMry.rit in.rrr th rrcrt iruilo du\ (tb p.d*qiw
bp...|oo. Ary mld urel tb hcDotbco iq)ld rbld b. ||.r.ttd bh. dctor@nilt ['Ii| t 1.. D*{ rrTLd
by r rtdc wt6nl &r i!t+dt'.d ptE r.tr oatlrsiE'
fddllmt Ubrudo mig afa arwi(uleri.l oodhid bry rvribbtc,6c oodrrho ud remndrtiru lrnld b
{lr EInd wltt d b. qrirtaod ralid odcg tlrir nrfurrd<n ir rnicsnd rd tbo fflr'i(s rd cmdrdoo of 0ir rqct rc
rcditra raf 4u'|{ h t|liltE Dy wAiJR f b pct b tht ddtlnd lTotrr c iqrrdrdnr culd rlEr fu oodtdr of tlir
r!ffi
xi.rlfod h bld.d bflE|nF bt tbaEcd, tuy tuuD ur of08 rlgd by rymodor {rl 0r iorecfud cli.il rill
nqefu eoo&rfm Uy WAI.|E sd panllc upddtg of tD Qod'
Environnental Scicntists and Engineers. Inc.
FAX Nn. .9?6 241.
eeSt eE3
Feb. 25 AWZ U.4FF1
!EE eAgA elt!
43t2
!!E
P4
glsE i3i l3E etB !133 ltlg
qqqio.gF 3i: :3: i:r 3:lF r33F
l'l'
9ege !et
l' I'tl
AAO EAA-aR ;z-R
'l'
ItEt
I
t:an
T
l
F
E
$!!l
c i E i Etl e
ilnlrEirllEriiiElrrli
F EE F EE E 5IF FEF 5E;F F iFF{rdd {ld +lrJ {tC .alrJC {tCrl
rt$$IIi 55F r$i IITT
T
q
t 'tAE
atT?
3c
a?
!ta
a?
ta
a
zo sa q-ldug rztqE-| ecue ! os llSca9zaE9)eogz'd
sEEI
EE
.aa
IE
EE
IE
Fl!
tl
dziIE ErI l"
FRO'I :UALSI{ ENUIROT{,4ENTAL, LLC
, ---'
t
Ff,IIi
EiEEiES
5i
a
i
5I
Ei
iI<olt,
iH!t
'
g
t'Io
EI!I
5
Eo
EI
E
Hr
5li
I!E
ta
ilF
a
E
E
8
g
Ia
EI!
Feb. 25 2@,2 @4i5ePn P5|91@ 241. 43t?
I3 EE gE
FAX NO.
aaQqEttt
a.l .lqtt-t
aa
I: !i e3
3r3i 33 a.l
*t**6.rdj
EE
t
I
E
FI
5t
olilr
tl
eE ri
Ii
EEHE
$! r$
I
I
IIACAz'az2
l:3irlEE!-
IITFiEEEiE
{liii ai .aa {i
fII
?
3T5
TI?tl
I:
Ff
EE:38grtuTEE{IBCl!!e3!g
H Ai
Et3
s1!
Io
3
dee:zl zo se qsgq€1 .ousTss Lt3ce9zae9ieos6.d
EEEE
s!
tg
EE
EE!
t
g
!t
Ei
E
E
E
lr
Fgi
ii!
6
E
EisE.r I
EF!$
Irla
E
d
, FR0i 3uALsH ENUIRoNMENTH-, LLc
-------1t-lJ-4,##
Eg
EE
I
il
'ffiti
3I- _ I
iir|EEiEElHiE3g
Ft)
t
IJ
EI
$tI
2
r.t
:
3
6
E
c
E
film|l0F
WHEN A *PUBLIC WAY PERMIT" IS REQUIRED
PLEASE READ AND CHECK OFF EACH OFTHE FOIIOMNG QUEfiONS REGARDING THE NEED FOR A
"PUBUC WAY PERMIT":
o is this a new residence?
o Does demolition work being performed require the use of the Right-of-Way, easements or' public property?YES_ NO_x-
Is any utility work needed? YES No-x-
Is the driveway being repaved?YES-X- No
Is a different access needed to the site other than the existing driveway? YES- NOX-
Is any drainage work peing done that affects the Right-of-Way, easements, or public property?
YES- NO X
Is a "Revocable Right-of-Way Permit" required?YES-X* NoE-
Is the Right-of-Way, easements or public property to be used for staging, parking or fencing?
YES_ NO_x-
If answer is NO, is a parking, staging or fencing plan required by Public Works?
YES No_x-
If you ansuered YES to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permif must be obtained'
..public Way Permif'applications may be obtained at the Public WorKs office or at Community
Development (a sample is attached). If you have any questions please call Leonard Sandoval in Public
Works at 479-2198.
I HAVE READ AND ANSWERED ALL THE ABOVE QUESNONS.
YES- NO y
Contra{gt Signature Company Name
F :/everyone/forms/bldpenn4
Questions? Call the Building Team at 479-2325
I0t{xl
Department of Community Devetopment
l, t IProject Name: ficllon (,t'; J-nrc
Project Address:
r' This cheklist must be ompleted before a Building permit apptiation isarcepted,
y' All pages of application is complete
{nu, DRB approval obtained (if required) provide a copy of approval form
$tAn Way Permit application included if applicable (refer to Public Works drecklist)./ef Staging plan included (refer to Public Works checklist) No dumoster,oarkino or material storaoe
,e!!gwed_sE roadugays and shoulders without written aooroval
-{ _ffio: test and results submitted if demolition is occurringoz-{rchitect stamp and signature (All Commercial and Multi faniily)
d f_uI floor plans including building sections and elerations(4 sets of plans for Multi-Family and
Cgrnmercial)
./ -l /1{ gndow anddoorschedule ry,ll L*.p
d )tdl structural plans, including design criteria (ie.loads)
d Structural Engineer stamp and signature on structural plans (All Commercial and Multi Family)
D 9gils Report must be submitted prior to footing inspection
{fnu resistive assemblies specified and penetrations inclicated
d lnouedetectors shown on plans
{ tyW and quantity of fireplaces shown
Ny,C-onaominium Association letter of approyal attached if project is a Multi-Family complexd Complete site plan submitted
Date of submittal:
F:/everyone/forms/bldperm2
Received By: _
DRAINAGE AND CULVERT INSPECTIONS ARE REOUIRED BY PUBTIC WORKS!
Please read and check off each of the items below:
o The Town of Vail Building Department has developed the following procedures to
ensure that new construction sites have adequately established proper drainage
from building sites along and adjacent to Town of Vail roads or streets.
o The Town of Vail Public Works Department will be required to inspect and approve
drainage adjacent to Town of Vail roads or streets and the installation of temporary
or permanent culverts at access points from the road or street onto the construction
site. Such approval must be obtained prior to any requests for inspection by the
Town of Vail Building Department for footings, temporary electrical or any other
inspection. Please call Leonard Sandoval at479-ZI9B to request an inspection from
the Public Works Department. Allow a minimum of 24 hour notice.
o Also, the Town of Vail Public Works Department will be approving all final drainage
and culvert installation with resulting road patching as necessary. Such approval
must be obtained prior to any Final Certificate of Occupancy issuance.
Agreed to by:
Project Name:
Date Signed:
Signature
F :/everyone/forms/bldperm6
,'fi:; ?% !,'offi;; h. @'{t'o
l,"P
Gft; STEWART TITLE' '
et gJ "Enlnncing the Real Bute
Closi-ng process,
_-<-\O
-F=tl
....--
I0t1{\
*THIS FORM CANNOT BE REDUCED
(Please type or print)
TOWN OF VAIL
APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT TO
ERECT OR MAINTAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON A
PUBLIC RIGHT-Of-WAY
owNER oF pRopERTy +t.-t *$ \L- %-o. or:.,TR-,
ADDRESS \ o 3,tt \* o vr=-+t-Fr Vlr <--R,
V qr.--t- <- c>
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED:
LOT <BLOCK a-SUBDIVISION \/ GfsL V€\^L
(lf necessary, attach description on separate sheet).
fnside lot -/
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OR ITEM(s)INTO RIcHT-OF-WAY:
Does structure presently exist?
Proposed date for commencement of construction \{ ta-ea-t+ . 2-o oz--
In consideration of the issuance of a revocable permit for the structure above indicated,
applicant agrees as follows:
1. That the structure herein authorized on a revocable permit basis is restricted
exclusively to the land above described.
2. That the permit is limited specifically to the type of structure described in this
application.
3. That the applicant shall notify the Project Planner and Public Works
Department, or their duly authorized agent, twenty-four hours in advance ol the
time for commencement of construction, in order that proper inspection may be
made by the Town.
4. The applicant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town of Vail, its
officers, employees and agents against all liability, claims and demands on
account of injury, loss or damage, including without limitation claims arising from
bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage,
or any other loss ol any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner
connected with applicant's activities pursuant to this permit, if such injury, loss, or
damage is caused in whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in
part by, tlre act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence or other
fault of the applicant, lris conlractor or subcontractor or any officer, employee or
representative of the applicant, his contractor or his subcontractor. The applicant
agrees to investigate, handle respond to, and to provide defense for and defend
against, any such liability, claims, or demands at the sole expense of the
applicant. The applicant also agrees to bear all expenses relating thereto,
including court costs and attorney's fees, whether or not any such liability, claims,
or demands alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent.
TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS
Fence
Wall
Landscapin g ____-____>-Other t'/
+q
Corner lot__
5.
Applicant agrees to procure and maintain, at its own cost, a policy or policies of
insurance sufficient to ensure against all liability claims, demands and other
obligations assumed by the applicant pursuant to this Paragraph 4.
Applicants further agree to release the Town of Vail, its officers, agents and
employees from any and all liability, claims, demands, or actions or causes of
actions whatsoever arising out of any damage, loss or injury to the applicant or to
the applicant's propefiy caused by the Town of Vail, its officers, agents and
employees while engaged in maintenance or snow removal activities or any other
activities whatsoever on Town of Vail property, streels, sidewalks, or rights-of-
way.
That the permit may be revoked whenever it is determined that the
encroachment, obstruction, or other structure constitutes a nuisance, destroys or
impairs the use of the right-of-way by the public, constitutes a traffic hazard, or
the property upon which the encroachment, obstruclion, or structure exists is
required for use by the public; or it may be revoked at any time for any reason
deemed sufficient by the Town of Vail.
That the applicant will remove, at his expense, the encroachment, obstruction, or
structure within ten days after receiving notice of any revocation of said permit.
That the applicant agrees to maintain any landscaping associated with the
encroachment on the right-of-way.
That in the event said removal of the encroachment, obslruction, or structure is
not accomplished within ten days, the Town is hereby authorized to remove
same and have the right to make an assessment against the property and collect
the costs or removal in the same manner as general taxes are collected.
That the applicant has read and understands all of the terms and conditions set
forth in this application.
Recording Fee for Revocable Right-of-way Permit'rdl@nd $s.00 for every
page thereafter. Make checks payable to Eagle GountfClerk and Recorder.
Special conditions:
6.
7.
B.
9.
10.
11.
DateSignature of Property Owner
(lf joint ownership, both signatures)
APPROVED:
Project Planner
Department of Public Works
PWFORMS/MISC/REVOCABROW. DOC
BEVISED 't119/2000
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
970-479-2138
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNIry DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Job Address:
Location,....:
Parcel No...:
Project No :
OWNER KELTON ARTHUR M .IR
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIIJ CO
81657
Lricense:
APPLICAIVI TIIGH PARK EIJECTRIC
P.O. BOX 1895
FRTSCO, CO
4o443
Lricense: 148-E
CONTR,ACTOR HIGH PARK EIJECTRIC
P.O. BOX L896
FRTSCO, CO
80443
License: 148-E
Desciption: remodel major part of house
Valuation: $10.000.00
-P-RfK 4A5J
04 /24 / 2002
04/24/2002 Phone : 97O-376-3322
04/24/2OO2 Phone : 97O-3?6-3322
FEE SUMMARY *a*r++r:i*r+a*t**'r****.***:*a*'t**'rr*+t+ll*'llil:rt**.****'t{**:t'r:t
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
IO34 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL
1034 Homestake Cr
210109205006
s180.00
s0. 00
s183.00
Permit #:
Status . .
Applied.
Issued .
Expires .
Phone:
E02-0040 rkot €cf-(q
3oioo{J NOt-ao 6c{
.: ISSUED.: 04/2412002
. : 0511712002.: ll/1312002
$183.00
$183.00
$183.00
Electrical----->
DRB Fee----->
Investigation->
will call----._>
TOTAL FEES->
t,.r.*:l:l* *+* *a Itll**aa'| l**:t t*t rai'l'lt *,tl *'t
Approvals:Iten: 05000 ELECTRICAJ,
os/L7/2OO2 df
Total Calculated Fees->
Additional Fees----.---->
Total Permit Fee--->
Paymenls-------->
BALANCE DUE----> SO. OO
* **,t*a +t +a'r* *'ta+ t* a:t t,t+ + l,t + t:l:t t *'t | *'t'll:l'l*!|a** *t'l'lt+a'l lll'lt:ttat*at l a
DEPARTMEMI
Action: AP
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARI'I{EMf
tl.*al *'l'tt*'t* rlt:.r:r*t*a at att'i a+:|ar*l:ttrtal.+*a*l a*a'|a l'lala
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Cond:12
(BLDG.): FIELTD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPI-,IAIiICE.
CLARATIONS
filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is conect. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
,^"ffi:k*(;
TO!\AI OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUMry DEVELOPMENT
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE IIOSTED ON TOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLDG. Permit #: D02-0021
Job Address: 380 E LIONSHEAD CR VAIL Status. . . : ISSLIED
Location.......: Lodge at Lionshead Unit 302 Applied . . : 04/29/2002
Parcel No....: 21.010640501.2 Issued. . . : 05/22/2002
Proiect No . : ?? Expires . . .: 71'/18/2002
ovilNER THOMPSON, WrLr,rAM W. O4/29/2OO2 Phone:
125 SI]MMIT AVE
MILIJ VALLEY CA
9494L
L.,icense:
APPLTCAT\r| HErD CONSTRUCTTON O4/29/2OO2 Phonez 97O-476-4343
2077 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD
SUITE 1-10
vArr_,, co 81557
License z 443-8
CoNTRACTOR HErD CONSTRUCTTON 04/29/2OO2 Phone:. 97Q-476-4343
2077 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD
SUITE 11-0
vArL, co aL65'7
I-,icense z 443-B
Desciption:
DEMOWORKONLY!!
Replace sliding doors, entry door and enlarge windows.
Occupancy: R1 Multi-Family
Type Construction: III 1-HR Type III 1-Hour
Type Occupancy: ??
Valuation: $5,000.00
Fireplace Infomation: Restricted:
Wood Pellet:
AddSqFt 0
# of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas Logs: 0 # of
$0 . 00 Total Calculated Fees-> $1s9. 75
$o - oo Additional Fees----->
Building-->
PIan Check-->
Inv estigation->
will call->
995 . o0 Restuarant Plan Review-->
961.75 DRBFee----------------->
g0 - 00 Recreation Fee------------>
53 . oo Clean-up Deposit------>
$0.00
90.00 Total Permit Fee----> $159.75
SO.0O pavments_______> 5159.75
TOTAL FEE$------> S159. ?5 BALr{NCE DUE-->s0.00
Approvals:I€em: 05500 FIRE DEPARTMENT
O5/O7/20O2 CDAVIS Action: AP CAN NOT REITEASE
THIS DEMO PERMIT I'NTII-, ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PERMIT IS
OBTAINED AITD FINAIIED
Item: 05L00 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
os/01 /2oo2 cDAVrs Actsion: AP FOR DEMO ONI,Y
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state la6 and to build this structure according to the towns zoning
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Unilorm Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWINTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TEL"EPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 5
PM.
Send Clean-up Deposit To: N/A
OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
PAGE 2
Permit #: D02-0021,
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
as of05-22-2002 Status: ISSUED
PermitType: DEMO.OFPART/ALLBLDG. Applied: 04/29/ZWz
Applicant HEIDCONSTRUCTION Issued: 05/22/2m2
97O47AU\ To Expire: 71'/18/2W2
fob Address: 380 E LIONSHEAD CR VAIL
Location: Lodge at Lionshead Unit 302
Parcel No: 21.07064050'1.2
Description:
DEMOWORKONLY!!
Replace sliding doors, entry door and enlarge windows.
Conditions:
Cond: 38
(BLDG.): THIS PERMIT IS GOOD FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ONLY.
AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT CERTIFICATE SHOWING THE AREAFREE
FROM ASBESTOS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY FURTHER WORK
OCCLIRING ON THIS SITE. IF FURTHER QTIESTIONS ARISE, CONTACT
THE VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT AT 479-2?50.
Cond:1
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY
WORK CAN BE STARTED.
TOI^/N OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ONTOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
MECHANICALPERMIT Permit #: M02-0O44
Job Address: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Status . . . : ISSLIED
Location.....: 1034 Homestake Cr Applied . . : 04/02/2002
ParcelNo...: 210109205006 Issued. .: 04/09/2002
ProjectNo: Expires..: 10/06/2002
OhINER KEI,TON ARTHI'R M iIR O4/O2/2OO2 PhONC:
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIL CO
8L6s7
License:
CoNTRACTOR ROBTNSON PLITMB/HEATING SQUAWo / 02/2002 Phone: 970-926-3859
POBOX54
EDWARDS CO
81632
License:159-P
APPLTCAIfl| ROBTNSON PLUMB/HEATTNG SQUAWo4/02/2OO2 Phone: 970-926-3859
POBOX64
EDWARDS CO
4L632
License:159-P
Desciption: MOVE HEAT IN HOUSE ADD HEAT IN KITHCEN AND SNOWMELT IN
DRIVEWAY
Valuation: $18,346.67
Fireplace lnlormation: Restricted: Y # ofGas Appliances: 0 # ofGas logs; 0 # of
Wood Pelleh
Mechanical--> 5380,00 ReshrarantPlanReview->
Plan Check->
lnvestigation->
Wiil Call----->
$o. oo Additional Fees-->
s3 .00
BALANCE DUE--_->
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMEM|
04/05/2002 JRt'[ Action: AP
Item: 05600 FTRE DEPARTMENT
CONDITION OF APPROVALCond: 12
(BLDG.): FIEI-,D INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPI-,IANCE.
Cond:22
(BI-,DG.): COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED PER SEC. 701 OF THE 1997 uMC, OR SECTION
701 0F THE 1997 rMC.
Cond:23
(BIDG.): INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFACTITRES INSTRUCTIONS AIID TO CHAPTER
90. 00 Total Calculated Fees--> $4?8 . 00
S9s.00 DRB Fe€.----_-._>
So . 00 TOTAL FEES----------> $4?8 . 00 Total Permit Fee-> $4?8 . 00
Payments-------;' $4?8.00
$0. 0o
9O.OO
10 OF THE 1997 TJMC, CHAPTER 10 OF THE 1997 IMC.
Cond: 25
(BLDG. ) : GAS APPITIANCES SIAI-,II BE VElimED ACCORDING TO CI{APTER 8 AND SHALL
TERMINATE AS SPECIFIED IN SEC.8O5 OF THE 1997 I]MC, OR CIIAPTER 8 OF THE 1997 IMC.
Cond:29
(BL,DG.): ACCESS TO HEATING EOUIPMENI MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 3 AND SEC.]-017 OF
THE 1997 UMC AND CHAPTER 3 OF THE ].997 IMC.
Cond: 3L
(BLDG. ) : BOILERS SIIALL BE MOUNTED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBL,E CONST- IINL,ESS
I-,ISTED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBLE FI-,OORTNG.
Cond:32
(BLDG.): PERMIT,PL.ANS AND CODE AIiIAI-,YSIS MUST BE POSTED IN MECIIANICAI ROOM PRIOR
TO AN INSPECTION REQI'EST.
Cond: 30
(BLDG. ) ; DRjAINAGE OF MECIANICAL ROOMS CONTAINING HEATING OR HOT-WATER SUPPLY
BOILERS S}IALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FI,OOR DRAIN PER SEC. LO22 OF THE 1997 I'},TC, OR
sEcTroN r-004.6 0F THE 1997 rMC.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this applicatiory filled out in full the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as requfued is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoninp
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 5
PM.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
Pr69g-E+
Building Permit#: B-oa-6zi
Medranical Permit #:
75 S. Frontage Rd.Vall,bloredo 81657
NTRACTORIMORMATION
RECMtr
MAR 2 8 Z(tLil
Town of Vail Reg. No;Contact and phone
"So".t Ctl\
COMPLETEVAL r&Materiatsl
Parce{ #
e*Cbo, N*( ) Addjriond ration( ) Repair( ) fther( )
Boiler location: Interior (Exterior( ) Other( )Does an EHU odst at this location: yes ( ) No t I
TlDe or Bbs: sir€refanrv (1 ^oot I lrruir-famiry r I comm"iiar 1-J-G6irant ( ) orher ( )
No. of Risting Dwelling Unlts in thts buildin$No. of Accommodation Unlts in this building:
No/fype of Fireptaces proposed: Cu, n Wood Burning (NOT ALLOWED)
a conveEion from a wood to an EPA Phase II devlceZ VE (-l-Td
**:r* * * rr !r* rl * rt*:r{.I.rtr.**!*t *r*FoR oFFII ONLY,f ,ft *r.*:t rl:l *,r***:r** **:r***i.r.*!t**,8
F:/ctcryonG/f onE/mcchpcnrl
F6o.,8fc'l1
o..ililind r (#t tlfl
DUllUlllE, o )urr r"
I
o0.ErF+
pp00.-G :it "'
,,
\
Yoo must obtain Desion Review Pganl (DRB) applwal if any of ttre nrechanicat nuork wiil involve ANyetcerior work This iricludes ana is noi rimiiea p lgqovat ard reptacement of driyeway snow mett
ffiigi;llease Gontact a ptanner at 4is-2t28 befiore suufrritting you. mCrr"-.iicar permit
The Torun of vail has adofted the lggS rnternational Meclranical @de (rMC) tuith the 1g!17 uniformMechanical Code (UMC) is an acceptabte itternative.
All neur onstsuctinn within the Torn of vail is considered to be of unusually tight construction, 6rusall combustion air is requirerl to be drawn rom outsioe the structurc fior mechanical equipmentRefercnce the f997 UMC Sec. 701,.2.
Town of Vail Fireolace Ordinance
In SepGmber of 199L the Vail Tqnn Council adoprEd an ordinane which restricts te oonstruction anduse of open hearth fireplaces within municipal uounoiriesl-- Since that time ttre ordinance hasundergone numerous chCnges ard revisions, st iving pr oomlromfun, vet enecivet in addressingthe air quality issue. Thereiore ttre rorrowing criteria has been adop&d:
o construction of open heanil wood burning firepfaces is no tonger permitEt wittin Town of vaalmunicipal boundaries.
o Dwellino Units - Eachnew dwelting unit may oontain:one (1) EPA Phase rr certified dtio ruel burning rtevice and no moreUran tu,o (2) gas applhnces(B vent)
OR
nrc (2) gas log fireplaces and no more than two (2) gas apptiance fireplaces (B bent).
o Restrict$ Dwelrino,,units - Each new restricted dweling unit may ontain:one (1) gas log fireprace and not mor€ than one (1) gas appriance fireprace.
o Accomrmcation uniF - Each new aooommodation unit may contain:One (1) gas log fireptace or one (1) gas apptiance firepfice.
e rf two or mone setsraF dwelling units or accommodation units are combined to form one tarilerunit' the combined u!!t mav reta-in one woodburninj ri,eplJce riro*;iffi;olsdj and no rnorethan 2 gas appriance ftreprices, or may .onyert up to trrd existing mr"pr""".'o gi".'
o rf tluring the courseof a remodel an existing woodburning fireplaoe is altercd or rnoyed, ure unitmust dlen complv witlr all provisions ortle -orainarce. iiiit ii, $t. fireptace must be conyertst tonaturar gas or rcptaced by an EpA phase rr certified unit.
F: /€ycrtone/f otfr /mcdrpcnn
Vail Mechanical Codes and Desion CriEri
TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMU{Iry DEVELOPMENT
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
vArL, co 81657
970-479-2t38
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit #: M02-0069
Goz-@.(\ MO{<)o'{Y
€r2<9\O 1x,;1-0o6{
Job Address: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
[ncation.....: 1034 Homestake Cr Applied . . : 04125/2002
Parcel No...: 210109205006 Issued . . : 06106/2002
ProjectNo: -pqS16-oAS'7 Expires..: 12/03/2002
ovitNER KEI-,TON ARTHI'R M JR O4/25/2OO2 Phone:
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIIJ CO
8155 7
License:
APPLTCA!{T SKYLTNE MECIIANTCAL O4/25/2OO2 Phone: 970-524-6809
P.O. BOX 1258
GYPSUM, CO
8163 7
I-,icense: 121-M
CONTRACTOR SKYL,INE MECIIAIIICAL 04/25/2002 Phone: 970-524-6809
P.O. BOX 1258
GYPST'M, CO
8153 7
License: 121-M
Desciption: MECHANICAL VENTILATION-3 FANS-DRYER - KITCHEN HOOD
Valuation: $500.00
|lT3l1T-'l-,3i,1':l;l1,:.]f-o;-"-,-'--,,*.*".*,t-j-:l*o.111lll'l*:'---9-.--,,,,u'*ol$.of.T*'*';*'*o******..*t"-.-,-t-"j.x:?1I:,l
Mechanical-->
Plan Check-->
Investigation->
will Call----->
$20. o0 Restuarant Plan Review->
$s. oo DRB Fe€----.-_----->
s0. oo ToTAL FEES---->
$3.00
$0.00 TotalCalculatedFe€s-->
90. 00 Additional Fees---->
528.00 Total Pemit Fee-'--'>
Pa)ments------->
BALANCE DUE_--->
$28.00
so. oo
s28.00
s28. 00
s0.00
t * t+ t't' *t *.t + t,tt*:i ** *'l | *lt l:t**'lrt**,tl 'll I *lt lt'l!}**a*!trt tl'li'i
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMEMT
04/29/2002 rRr[ Action: AP
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENI
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIEI-,D INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIAIICE-
Cond: 22
(BLDG.): COMBUSTIONAIR IS REQUIRED PER SEC. 701 OF THE 1997 UMC, OR SECTION
701 0F THE 1997 rMC.
Cond: 23
(BLDG. ) I INSTAJ-,LATION MUST CONFORM TO MANIIFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS Al{D TO CHAPTER
1,0 OF' THE 1997 I]MC, CHAPTER 10 OF THE 1997 IMC.
Cond: 25
(BL,DG.): GA^9 APPIJIANCES SHALL BE \EIITED ACCORDING TO
TERMINATE A.S SPECIFIED IN SEC.8O6 OF THE 1997 IJMC, OR
Cond: 29
(BIJDG. ) : ACCESS TO HEATING EQUIPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH
THE 1997 T'MC A}ID CHAPTER 3 OF THE 1997 IMC.
Cond:31
(BLDG.): BOIL,ERS SHALL BE MOIIIIIED ON FLOORS OF NONCOMBUSTIBI-,E CONST. UNLESS
I,ISTED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBI-,E FLOORING.
Cond: 32
(BLDG.): PERMIT,PLAI.IS AND CODE AI{AIYSIS MUST BE POSTED IN MECIIANICAI ROOM PRIOR
TO AN INSPECTION REQT'EST.
Cond: 30
(BLDG.): DRAINAGE OF MECHANICAI, ROOMS CONTAINTNG HEATING OR HOT-WATER SUPPLY
BOfIJERS SIIAI-,L BE EQUIPPED WIIH A FLOOR DRiAIN PER SEC. LO22 OF TIIE 1997 UMC, OR
SECTION 1004.5 0F THE 1997 rMC.
CHAPTER 8 AND SHAIJL
CHAPTER 8 OF THE 1997 IMC,
CTIAPTER 3 AI{D SEC.1.01.7 OF
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and suMivision codes, design review
approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances ofthe Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:OO AM . 5 PM.
TURE OF OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
I
O4l25l2AA2 A9:27 97A5246AL6 SKYI-INE MECHA.IICAL ZL
TOI^/NOF VAIL DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE TIOSTED ON IOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PLUMBING PERMIT Permit #: P02-0015
Job Address: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 1034 Homestake Cr Applied . . : M/02/2002
ParcelNo...: 210109205006 Issued. .: 04/09/2002
ProjectNo: Expires..: 1'0/06/2002
OV{INER KE],TON ARTHI'R M 'JR O4/O2/2OO2 PhONE:
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIIJ CO
4L657
License:
coNrRjAcToR RoBrNsoN Pr-,IIMB,/HEATTNG SQUAWo4/02/2OO2 Phone: 970-926-3859
POBOX54
EDWARDS CO
47.632
License: 159-P
ApprJrcANT RoBrNsoN PLUMB/HEjATTNG SQUAWo4/02/2002 Phone z 970-926-3859
POBOX64
EDWARDS CO
4L632
License: 159-P
Desciption: extending kitchen, removing tub and replacing
Valuation: 974,573.00
Fireplace Information: Reshicted: ??# of Gas Appliarces:. ?? # of Gas lngs: ?? # of
Wood Palleb
Plumbing--> $225. oo Restuarant Plan Review-->
Plan Check--> 556 . 2 s DRB Fee---------_----->
50.00 Total Calculated Feer-> 5284.25
S0.00 Additional Fees___-> S55.00
Investigation->
will calt->$3.00
BALANCE DUE->$0 .00
Item: 051O0 BUII-,DIIIG DEPARTMENT
o4/o5/20o2 ,rRM Action: AP
Itemr 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONDITION OF APPROVALCond:12
(BLDG.): FIEI-,D INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this applicatiorL filled out in fuIl the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
so . oo ToTAL FEES---------> S2A4 ,25 Total Permit Fee-_-> 933 9.25
Payments--------> $339.25
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town apptcable
thereto.
REQLIE9IS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:(X) AM - 5
PM.
SIGNAruRE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNET
Plumbing Permit #:
97 O- 47 9 -2149 (Inspections)
NWT{-WVl:
75 S. Frontage
Vail, Colorado
Rd.
81657
CONTRACTOR INFORMA
COMPLETE VALUATIOT{ FOR PLUMBING PERMIT (labor & Materials)
brnSo'r C.e-\l 3Qo-
eest^^.*
PLUMBING:$ rl4 513-
Parcel # (Required if no bldg. permit # is provided above)
rob Name: k:\t-_
Phone: 3gu- 6 /(
a
Work Class: New ( )(\/f Altention(" ) Repair( ) other( )
Type of Bldg.: Single-family (,uf Duplex ( ) Multi-family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Accommodation Units in this building: INo. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building:
Is this a conversion from a wood burning fireplace to an EPA Phase II device? Yes ( ) No
Contact Assessorc Office at 97O-328-864O or visit
***************************************FOR OFFICE
for Parcel #
usE oNLY*" * ** ***** **** *** ** !t** ***** ** *** * ****
331 Jr
F/a/eryone/fi ormddmbperm
\?t"1,' '!q.r..,. _rr. .i f
t\,is\.
!*
,\.t1'li-.i
Community Development Departnent Russell Fone3t Direqtor,
(970) 47s.213s
Check all thd applies-
1. Which Deparfnen(s) did you conbcl?
Building _ Environmental_ Housing_ Admin
Planning DRB _ PEC
Was your initial contact with our sbff immediaie
no one available ?
slow 0r
4.
?
Was your project reviewed on a limely basis? Yes / No
lf you were required to wait how long was il before you were
helped?
lf no, why no?
5. Was this your first time b file a DRB app- PEC app
Bldg Permit_ ttUA
Please rate fie performance of the staff person who assisted you:54321Namq
(knowledgq responsiveness, availability)
Overall effectiveness of he Front Service Counter. 5 4 3 2
What is fte best lime of day for you to use the Front Service
Counter?
9. Any commenb you have which would allow us to better serve you
nexttime?
Thank you hr taking the tme to complete this survey. We are
commited b improving our seMce.
n
;l*::,,1
lr ?'1, n
t I tJ-U i -. iL{-;j In*xr+*sioil ft equest Heportt*g
'J,1lL. f_:r) T{)$JH '*F
F:sge J
-1.56 'rrrr \t:i!:n1-
- 1i&l€
ligqurli*.j i'r is$ : r 34fij.
J! siti*liii.ii ?n:
, l;t,'-i tcti:,r: T rp':,
i;1:;;;:i"i*!r Al EA:
, s'le 4...i',lq+1].t
t!<utr,rav, Osi"Ji.,rt i; . li! 1"cii\{lsa! n,1
t::i:,
li]3r |i0f'lf f,.i ti'r',? i:Fl t/,\l{.-
ti j?d tl(}n'FtLrP* 1.'I
': _- ,EE-irJi3li}t,;
.q.IlJt#: Eij:'+i*l rr,1.; n ru,i jli I :::r.lir l.;:r ^i.!i!:i:, $lrtu$ I5!UED
i on " lpe. Oclut.::r':; . r.i r-:i . . ll ii:r6 ir{:a: tfr
C*iner' (EiTSil if :-.t ri',tti tJr Jr-r
l&-,lrfi:!or. E..'| F- -Lt'r':'{)[l El.!?Ll]f Ri 1i..r.. ili,'r.r, liC'.Ji:i, ila,.l
a:]r ||c.ir-11: FOLES ilt$T0in Ft-fit- Dli F,rl l*.tf f iir:irl. ,i 10-i;i:l:.,"*iii
[!si!;F.r;,jn. N[[/li,'r$rl. i{t!i]lrE . r_jF:F!::F ;l.ili:,if !iti; R(.:i;ri Iiic.r-liti}+id:illrs;i.:}: 3t j')\ jMi:Lt ifilvtetrAr'
'3{| menl iL..:
RIL: . i'::- ilFf,:".
- F r1:1i.. !1i.'.1lEli.".rrrl',1i.:vAt"t . t-1. 1".,J3 ii,j.:orr,rliengi
n i.urr..*.r '::r.i€ (gr,r oil---'
9i;;r'r . c6C- !90d
i:';-'A._/tS f;,t.\*':t(.:i * ; . !-t:.4MF53fi1L K
AEiIfl i.ll:lr'r io l"{ilta-
. i?rr.r ." L, r.r: I r-
nsslJ.treti 'i J:,*fae:
firiF':('l}f,'i€n.3i lFei-_'{r$'rqEi,q..-
LjLhiS:i;,^.l..: EC!'ll,f-r tNt
3n,"1 ffi,(LElZ tt Q E^^;'ft <-
tD [Y) ffrcu Rt'M Frt62roL
- 11,+*a Pn,Ntr Pra-t(f-O c Nt . fu.il-1-g6-,)gWsr-[\
L,V Sr fr,'l9 A?f fYtgrut-{c"
i"\t,
Jt )-
(Dvrc"',re"&
rrr|:rlitn I.ltt?- l' a r" .:, .-
b
1E
Ni.-.I-t IC: A'?
#t-
-r''
G'r.p'
tD*
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel; 970.479.2L39 lax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Kelton residence DRB Number: DRB020193 - KotiSttr
Project Description:
Exterior color change.
Pafticipants:
OWNER KELTON ARTHUR M JR 0611712002 Phone:
288 BRIDGE ST
VA]L CO
81657
License:
APPUCANT PiperArchitecture, LTD 0611712002 Phone: 949-7074
Duane Piper
POB 5560
Avon, CO 81620
License:
ProjectAddress: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Location: 1034 Homestake Cr
Legal Description: Loe 5 Block: 6 Subdivision: VAIL VILI-AGE FIUNG 7
Parcel Number: 210109205006
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Bill Pierce Action: APPROVED
Second By: Charles Acevedo
Vote: 5-0 Date of Approval= 071t712002
CondiUons:
Cond:8
(P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $2O.O0
Revaian7,9.42
BillGibson, Plonner
Deportment of Community Development
75 South Frontoge Rd. W.
Voil. CO 81657
Re: Kelton Remodel / Color Chonges
1034 Homestoke Circle
Biil:
Wlndows
Siding
APPROVED RY THE- -' rl
Pleose note the occomponying colors ond monufocture nomes ond numbers os
o revision to the opprovol ot 6.1202.
DE'
DI
Pozt I Smoke (remoining the some)
Ben Moore / Amhent Groy / HCl67
..1RD
z/rt/ot
Wndow Trim Ben Moore / Kendoll Chorcool / HC-]66
Best Regords,
Duone Piper
Architect
Encl: Cslors for siding ond window trim,
cc: Boles Custom Builders
Eloine ond Art Kelton
piper /orch itectu re, ltd .
48 e. beover creek blvd, box 5560 ovon. colorodo 81620 97O-949-7O74Iax97O-949-6253
I
TOI,I,NM
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Community Development
75 SoLrth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 97O.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Kelton residence DRB Number: DR8020193
Project DescripUon:
Exterior color change.
Participants:
OWNER KELTON ARTHUR M lR 061L712002 Phone:
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIL CO
81657
License:
APPUCANT PiperArchitecture, LTD 061L7/2002 Phone: 949-7Q74
Duane Piper
POB 5560
Avon, CO 81620
License:
ProjectAddress: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Location: 1034 Homestake Cr
Legal Descriptiol: Loe 5 Bbck: 6 Subdivision: VAIL WLLAGE FIUNG 7
Parcel Number: 210109205006
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: SIAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: Date of Approval= 0611912002
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PI-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for buiHing, Please consult with
Town of Vail BuiHing personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $20.00
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 tax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General Information:
All poects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the pafticular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Developnlent Deparunenl The
project may also need to be rs/iewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Description of the Request:
LocationoftheProposal: tot: Q abck: b subdivision:W Z4€A&0{f++
Physicaf Address: t0++ Wwre+fryL, 4at
Parcel No.:U 0 | 0 nL| 6 de b (contact Easre co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcet no.)
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
E-mail Address:
Type of Review and Fee:
tr Signs
E Conceptual Review
tr New Constructiontr Addition
tr Minor Alteration
(m ulti-family/commercial)
tr Minor Aheration
(single family/duplex)
/ Cnange to Approved Plans
tr Separation Request
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, paintng, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor dlanges to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans
Design Review Board.
No Fee
already approved by Planning Staff or the
RECE,YEO
For Office Use Only:
Fee Paid: Check No.: J5&55 By:
It 7
Planner:
Date:
6.12,02
BillGibson. Plonner
Deportment of Community Development
75 South Frontoge Rd. W.
Voil. CO 8.|657
Re: Kelton Remodel/ Color Chonges.|034 Homestoke Circle
Bill:
At DRB presentotion, the Kelton's hod chosen to leove the exterior colors on their
residence the some os previously exisfed, They now wish to vory slightly from thot
color scheme,
Pleose note the occomponying colors ond monufocture nomes ond numbers.
Windows Poz:t lSmoke
Window Trim Ben Moore / Amherst Groy / HCl67Sidino Porter Points / Wolnut Husk / 6750-l
windows ond window trim.
cc: Boles Custom Builders
piper/orch itecture,ltd.
48 e. beqver creek blvd. box 5560 ovon. colorodo 81620 97O-g49-7O74tox97O-949-6253
Siding
Duone
Best Regor
oo. '6.12.02
COLOR CHANGES
KELTON RESIDENCE
I O34 HOMESTAKE CIRCLE
VAIL, CO
CLAD WINDOW I POZI / smoke
DATE:
TOWN Or r/AlL
DESIGN t :W
STAFF APi -'."/AL
c h{o.
Stnrr: 88
WINDOW TRIM / Benjomin Moore / Amherst groy HC-I67
SIDING / Porter Points / Wolnut Husk / 6750-1
o
++f{r+**tf*ara{r++**'}t{r****{r{'*a**r**+{'***t*t{rff+++******{'+***+****t*tr+f,*att*tia**t*a**l'}*r+a+t*
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement
f*t'i*+t*|tII't|***t*tt****ttt**a****t+t***tt ,|'|*t*f,**tt{'**||*****af+*|****'l{r*t****a****{'|*+++t*|
Statsement llumber: ROOO0O2596 Anrount: $20.00 06/L7/200204:41 PM
Pa)ment Method: Check Init: iIAR
Notsatsion: 5052 Duane Piper
Permit. No: DFaO2O193 Type: DRB-Chg to Appr PLanE
Parcel No: 210109205006
Site Address r 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIIJ
Iocations 1034 Home6take Cr
Tota1 Feea: $20. o0
ThiE Pa)mEnt: $20.00 Total ALL Pmts: $20.00
Balance: $0.00
tl*taf++{ra*'}'}**+'}***'}'}**+,t't!*l't*f*fl't*+*f***+****{r**+taf+++**f**1*'ta****+*+{t{tt*t*+a++****t'}t*
ACCOI,JNTITEM LIST:
Account Code Descr"iotion Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEi.J FEES 20 .00
IOIfNT)
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Deparbnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tell 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.rrail.co. us
Project Name: Kelton residence DRB Number: DR8020020
Project Description:
Changes to approved plans.
Pafticipants:
OWNER KELTON ARTHUR M JR 01/3V2002 Phone:
288 BRIDGE ST
VAIL CO
81657
License:
APPUCANT Duane Piper 0Ll3Ll20OZ Phone:949-6253
POB 5560
AVON, C,o
81520
License:
Prcject Address: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIL Location: 1034 Homestake Cr
Legal lrescraption: Lot: 5 Blodc 6 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FIUNG 7
ParcelNumber: 210109205@6
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: Date of Approvalz 0212012002
Conditionsr
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $20.q,
TA -m Application for Design Review
Departnent of C.ornmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel 970.479.2t39 fax: 970.4t9.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General fnformation:
This appli:atian b &r any pmject requhing Design Review appoval. Any project requiring design review must
receive approval prior b submiting a building permit application. Phase reftr b the submittal requiremenB br the
particular appro/al that is reqr.resbd. An applicauon br Design Review cannot be accepted until all required
infunnation is received by the Community Dsvelopment Deparfnent. The project may abo need to be reviewid by
the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design Review Board approval tapses
unless a building permit is bsued and construction oommencer within one year of the approval.
Description of the Request, A,t-,-r4* ((AU wvg a(ft<t*l--
Location ofthe Proposal= t-ot: Q erlck:(Z suoairsion: \bt- \JilJ..XzO 1b,
Physicaf Address: l0A4 l,.M*<ef,v-< a+oVe
Parcef No.: A/O/(nA O€OOb (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mail[ng Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
Type of Review and Fee:
tr New C-onstrr,rctimtr Addition
E Minor Alteratbn
For construction of a new building or derno/rebuild.
For an addition where square botage is added to any residential or
commerchl building (inckdes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes b buildings and site improvanents, such a,
reroofing, painting, wirdow additions, landscaping, Ences and
retaining walb, eE.
$20 For'revisbns to plans aheady approved by Planning Stafi or the
Design Review Board
Address:
$200
$50
$20
y' Cranges to Approved Plans
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPUCATION, ALL S,JBMTTTAL REQIIIREMENTS
AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLOMDO 81657.
LIST OF PROFOSED MATERIAIS
TYoe of Material ColorBuildino Materials
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windou,s
WindowTrim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Ughting
Other
Notes:
Please specify the manufacture/s color and number and attach a color chip.
All exterior lighting must meet the Town's regulations regarding lighting (see Title 14 - Development
Standards). If exterior lighting is proposed, please indicate the number of fixtures and locations on a
separate lighting plan. Identiff each FDdure type and provide the height above grade, lumens output,
luminous area, and attach a cut sheet ofthe light fixtures.
III. Drainage (check all that apply)o fhe required valley pan is shown on the site plan as per Development standards, p. 12.o (Note: Valley pan must not be heated)o 4 Foot Concrete Pan o I Foot Concrete Pano Positive and adequate drainage is maintained at all times within the proposed site.o culverts have been provided and are labeled and dimensioned on the sile phn.o A Hydraulic report has been provided. (As requested byTown Engineer)
ry. Erosaon Control (Check all that apply)o Disturbance area b greater than one hatf acre.o A separate Erosion control Plan has been professionally engineered and pE stamped.o Less than one half acre has been disturbed, and proper erosion control devices are shown on the siteplan.
V. Floodplain (check all that appty)o The project lies within or adjacent to a 100 year Floodplaino 100 year Floodplain is shown on the site plan.s A Floodplain study has been provided. (Required if floodplain is within construction limits or as
requested by Town Engineer)a The project does not lie within or adjacent to a 100 year Floodplain
VI. Geological/Environmental Hazards (check all that apply)o The project lies within a Geologic/Environmental Hazard area. (See Development Standards, p. 20)o A Hazard Report has been provided
o The project does not lie within a Geologic/Environmental Hazard area.
VlI. Grading (check all that apply)o Existing and pmposed grades/contours are provided on the site plan.o All disturbed areas have been retumed to a 2:1 grade.
o All disturbed areas not returned to 2:1 grade have been Professionally Engineered with slope
protection and/or stable soils. PE stamped details are provided within plans.
o Only o(isting contours are shown on the site plan, there is no proposed grading.
VIII. Parking (check all)o All residential and commercial parking spaces conform to the Development Standards, pp. 12&15.
IX. Retaining Walls (check all that apply)o All retaining walls conform to the standards in the Development Standards, p. 19.o All retaining walls and combination walls over 4 feet have been Professionally Engineered and a PE
stamped detail has been provided within the plans.
o All retaining walls are shown on the site plan, with labeled top and bottom of wall elevations and Wpe
of wall construction.o No retaining walls are required for this project.
X. Sight Distance (check all that apply)s Proper sight distance has been attained and shown on site plan as per Development Standards, p,12.o Proper sight distance has not been attained. Explanation why: ,
Additional Comments
Please provide any additional comments that pertain to Public WorK Review.
Applicants Signature
1.17.42
BlllGlbsn, Pbnner
Deportment of Community Development
TSsorrth Frontosp Rd. W.
Voil, CO 81657
Re: Kelton l?emodel'l034 Homestoke Circle
Bl[:
Dudng the flnol work of construction drcnrlngs, the Kelton's hove opted to not
pursrre the tower portlon of the moster becfoom. lnsteod, we wlsh to mc*ntoln
the existlng roof llne on the south ebvotion ond rnerely extend the upper l€ve+
deck ior cbsure of the new kitchen oreo bebw.
Thls chon€p reduces our GRFA by obout 70 sguore feet. However, the slte
coveroge remoins the some ond thot hos olwofs been the determining foctor
fordenslty on thls proiect.
I oppreciote yow revlew of this chonge. Pbose coll wfth ony comments or
thot mcry odse,
/ A-l thru A-5
opplbotion form
r-evbw fee
piperlorch itecture,ffd.
48 e. beaver creek blvd. bol( 5560 qron, cokyodo 81628 9VA-C49-7O74foxC7*949-625&
** **** ***** ***+**f+{rf++****'t't***********t**t!t'**f*i****t * * t*******++*++**+**********++ **++**+
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
*i **** **** * ******* * *+****+**f+++***++***********lt*'if,*** **t****++******+i**{.'}*+**+**********l
Statement Nuniber: R000001938 Amount: $20.00 Ol/3L/200202:42 P1NI
Palrment Method: Check Init: iIAR
Notation: 4987 Duane Piper
Permit No: DR8020020 qrpe: DRB-Ch9 to Appr Plans
Parcel No: 21010 92 05 0 0 6
Site Addresa: 1034 HOMESTAKE CR VAIIJ
L.,ocation: 103 4 Eomeatake Cr
Total Fees: $20.00
This Payment: $20.00 Totat ALL Prnts: $20.00
Balance: $0.00
*t* *,t** ***** **+***++ +*++**++i***+1**i++***+*f*****+{.*+++*++***t****+*'}+*+a******t**+++*++*lt
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descniolion Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI,J FEES 20.00
Projecl Application -? lu /.2 >Dat? -Z/t /7. ' ,/
Project Name:
Owner, Address and Phone: Q.
Architect, Address and Phone:
//o
Legal Description: Lot
Com menls:
{ro"x { , ritins
Design Review Board ,/,
o"." :j /z ,/77
//
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
'
Su mmary:
(€.(,*i:,,.,""
' i'-.: ..'r'.0 7l L]/tr
DESTGN
IJECAL DESCRIITTON:IJO T\)\
o
REVIEI{
o
VATL,BOARD APPI,ICATION . TOIIN OF COIJORADO
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:r*rtt*tttt
.':
Ir.
A r^\:"\-.
--f c.
D.
If property is desclibed bydescript,ion, pldase provideto Lhis appl ica lion.
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
f!^9 4V,(.,Ul,$ 10, 001 - $ sO, 000$ s0. 001 $ 1so, 000
91s0.001 - g s0o,00o
$s00, 001 - $1.000,000$ over $1,000,000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPIRES
APPROVAIJ IJNIJES S A BUUJDING PERMIT ISrS STARTED.
Block C.o
L;'
a meeLs and bounds legalon a separaLe sheet. and atLach
FEE
D Z\r. VU
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$4 00.00
$s00. 00
ONE YEAR AFTER FINA!
ISSUED AIVD CONSTRUCTION
Mailinq Address : tE e-
-) H.NAME qF OWNER(S) :
OrolER (SI SIGNATURE:
ilinq Address;
Phone&*t BE PROCESSED WITHOAT O'fi'ER'S STGTVA"URE
E.
I.
,r-
NAME OF APPLICANT, S REPRESENTATIVE: A}gT>e€.L._, At3E6\^r-1
.flirins Addt":"t' \bvt* c-czr..C;e.c.-so, -a ta,lc-.
Condominium ApprovaL if applicable.
?lt! FEI: DRB. fees. as shown above,l are t,o be paid aE EheLr!.e .-r.il slrh'ni. t taL c! ts-he irx.i;.applibarion- r-,aLer.. vrhenapplying for a building permicl pfbase- iaentify Lhe iJcurace:ilug!lg".of r.he p{oposar. rhe iown ot vuir "irr aal.rsi-ci,Jtee according Eo the table below. to ensure rhe corr;cc fee-is paid.
DESCRTPTION : AFb\.(\^.: \9
TYPE OF REVIEW:
LA
ZONING:
.'trE-<5i<.
-Lrsr or lrArERr&g o
NAME OF PROJECT: \a.G.r-:<G!r-) lGti\s,->-S|\\4b\- AErE\\la._J
TEGAL DESCRTpTToN: r,oTjl BLOCK 6 suaDrvrsroN
STREET ADDRESS:
Tbe foLlowing inf ormat.ion is
Review Board before a final
A. BUII,DING MATERIAIS:
D^^{
Siding
oLher wall MateriaLs
F ascia
,
soffi ts
windows
windotr Trim
Door Trim
.
lland or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashings
Cil i. i.aeys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
ReLaining walLs
Ext.erior L,ight,ing
O Lher
I,ANDSCAPING: Name of
required for submi tLal
approval catr be qiven:
to the Design
TYPE OF MATERTAIJ COLOR
\a l'L\G.|\ ejr.\-.snhsl
.*: TP trA'A$
1-a--Ea.+(_\G> hA*€,\\
E ln LEl\ !EL\ah\: a
la t1A-E\ f-:rstrr.::a
s/*
:TGE
Designer:
Phone:
I
I
t5.
PROPOSED TREES
A!{D SHRUBS
"oo"t ,o}'roo, r BoLanica} Name Ouan t i t.v Si ze*..
ti' ES> E1x\=fi}-=C\ E {_f_S !:!J(c_E-*
@ EE*-, V.tf€J+ca-,
*hdicate caliper for deciduous trees.
aleciduous t.rees is 2 inches: Indicate Minimum caLiper forheight. for coniferoustrees.**IndicaLe size5 oallon.
GRO['ND, COVERS
of proposed
G,sa4a->-: @J-rJL
TvDe
-E!EJf\A.-=*
Ar-+1
Square Foo t.aoe
b\+;SL:f-S3<S
soD
SEED
Y=_,=€E-D a.> F-- -\t- -E-
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSTON CONTROL
C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exeerior tighting is proposed. please
sho$r Lhe number of fixlures and LocaLions on a leparat.LIighting pIan. rdentify each fixLure from Lhe filhcing pfan
il the space below and provide r.he height above giade. -cype oflighL.proposed, Iumen ouLput; Iuminous area and i cuc stiLl u otLhe LighL f ixt.ure. (SecLion 18.54.050 .t)
oTHER ITANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa1ls,, fences, swimmingpooLs, ecc.) please specify. tndiiace height.s of retaininiwalLs. Maximum heighr of walls vriLhin the fronL setback i;3'. Maximun height of walls el_sewhere on Lhe property is G,
I
I
D.
'\
-r*
runnoon.moved to tabte actiorOtne seibert Gircre aripiece ti
"rro*
ue .n , ' "[il=[" .$gf,.Yr1 ",bptions. Ludwig seconded the motion, and a vote was taken whicir passed, 5,1, Ke'r'in Fole; opposed.
Item number eight on the agenda was an appeal of a variance approval (4-2; Moffet and pratt opposed, Aasland
absent) made bythe Planning and Environmental Commission on February 10, 1997. ApplicantsArtand Elaine
Kelton were granted a front setback variance of 5' - 6" to allow an additional one-car garage to be constructed at 1034
Homestake Circleilot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing. Diana Donovan, a neighbor, had appealed the decision,
noting the variance had not met the criteria and findings of the Town Code and constituted a grant of special privilege.
Town of Vail Planner Dirk Mason presented the item, stating that staff recommended that the Town Council overturn
the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a 5' - 6" front setback variance.
Rob Ford recused himself from the issue. Dirk referenced a memo dated March 4, 1997 to the Town Council and
reviewed the following consideration of factors:
1) The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.2) The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation
is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.3) The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic
facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
Dirk stated the following findings had to be made before granting a variance:
1) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
on other properties classified in the same district.?) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.3) That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:a) The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical
difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.b) There are exceptions or extraordlnary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the
variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the sanre zone district.c) The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
Jim Morter, Architect for the Applicants, stated his reasons for believing there was a physical hardship and that the- granting of the variance should be upheld.
Council members felt that the variance awarded the applicant by the PEC constituted the granting of a special
privilege. Town Attorney Tom Moorhead stated his feeling that the PEC findings were unsubstantiated.
Kevin Foley then moved to overturn the PEC approval of the variance request, based on the following findings:
1- That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 1 8 (Zoning) have not been met.2- That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on
other properties classified in the same district.3. There are no exceptions, extraordinary ciicumstances, or conditions that are applicable to this site that apply
generally to other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential zone. In addition, any hardships which
have been presented, have been self irnposed.4- The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation does not deprive the applicant of privileges
enjoyed by owners of other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential district.
Ludwig seconded the motion. A vote was then taken which passed unanimously, 5-0-1 Rob Ford abstained..
Agenda item number nine was Town Council call-up of a Planning and Environmental Commission unanimous
approval (6-0) of a major exterior alteration located at the Creekside Building, 229 Gore Creek Drive/LotA, Block 58,
VailVillage 1st Filing. Applicant Michael Ditch. Town Planner, Lauren Waterton presented the item and provided
the following background: On March 24, 1997, the PEC approved, with three conditions, a request for a major exterior
alteration to allow for 1,050 square feet of an existing deck area to be enclosed to allow for an outdoor dining deck
with approximately 10 tables. Lauren stated the staff recommendation was for approval of the major elterior
alteration with three conditions, and referenced the staff memo to the PEC, dated March 24, 1gg7 , for i complete
description of the request. Lauren noted the request was also scheduled for DRB review.
Applicant' Michael Ditch, who is proposing a new restaurant for the space, presented drawings and a model of theproposed alteration for review by Council members.
Pepi Gramshammer, an adjacent property owner, was concerned about how trash would be removed from the site.
Paul Johnston then moved to uphold the PEC approval of a Major Exterior Alteration at the Creekside Building, with
a second from Ludwig including conditions as approved by PEC. A vote was then taken which passed, s-1, Rob Ford
vaiI ToHn counciI Evening l,teeting Minutes Aprit 1, ,!997
,r .. . ] *\\, "rvoting in^opposition_ -^. ^oTenth on the agenda was a report frohthe Town Manager. In addition to his written report, Bob Mclaurin distributeda final draft of the 1997 community survey and asked for council "orr"nt.. Bob also presented the council witha proposed budget for the west Vail roundabout and asked council to authorize him to enter into a contracl with thelow bidder, Ducktes Construction of Steamboat Springs to move forwil;il the $5.37 million projecl. Minor mattersare still pending with the army core of engineers, Bob said, out ne expeaeo those issues to ti. il"orr"d very soon.
Ludwig moved to authorize the Town manager to enter intd a contract with Duckles construetion contingent upondiscussions yet to be had with colorado Department of rransportafion, ine Arrv c"i"
"] eiiin""", anct otherproperty owners. Paul seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 6-0.
A motion was then made by Ludwig to adjoum into executive. session to discuss personnel issues. Rob secondedthe motion. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at approxim"Git i6:;il.r.
llinutes tEken by lotty ccutcheon
(*Nanes of certain indiyiduals $o gavp Dublic input ftaJ be inaccur.te. )
Respectfully submitted,
ATTEST:
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Vail To!,rn CounciL Evening Meeting Minutes Aprit 1, l99Z
I
b)o]"
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 1997
1:30 P.M. ATTOVCOUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to
determine at what time Council will consider an item.
3.
1.
2.
Holly McCutcheon
4.
Larry Grafel
Todd Oppenheimer
Pam Brandmeyer
George Ruther
5.
Andy Knudtsen
6.
Russell Forrest
Tom Braun
Executive Session - Negotiations and Legal lssues. (30 mins)
Interview for Local Licensing Authority members. (15 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:Appoint one new memberto serve
an unexpired term ending January, 1998.
BACKGROUND MTIONALE: The following citizens have apptied for
appointment on the Local Licensing Authority:
William F. (Bill) Bishop
Debbie Kay Nicholson
Interview for Art In Public Places Board members. (15 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Appoint two new members with
three-year terms to expire February, 2000.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The fotlowing citizens have apptied for
appointments on the AIPP Board:
Nancy Andresen (reapplying)
Jim Cotter (reapplying)
Donald G. DeLaria
MikkiFuternick
Jerome B. Jacobs
Sara A. Newsam
Jerry Schildroth
Cathy Zaden
Ford Pait Discussion. (30 mins.)
Update on the Public Works seasonal housing development. (5 mins.)
Review of existing Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) policy and
possible alternatives. (1 hr.)
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCTL: Review the anatysis of the
altematives and the recommendations of the planning and Environmental
Commission and staff.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: The Vait Town Council directed staff to
evaluate the existing GRFA system and determine whether this is an
effective and appropriate tool for regulating mass and bulk when
compared to other alternatives. The purpose of this work session is to
revievthe analysis of three alternatives to the existing GRFA policy for
single family, duplex, and primary/secondary type structures only. This
t.
8.
7.
Susan Connelly
o
10.
11.
Dirk Mason
12.
Lauren Waterton
work session is intended to describe: how to implement each of these
alternatives; what homes might look like under each alternative; and to
identify considerations that would need to be evaluated for each
alternative. On March 1Oth, the PEC, in a 4-3 vote, recommended
altemative 1 with several conditions. At the April 1st work session, staff
will review the alternatives with council along with the recommendations
from the PEC and staff. At the evening meeting on April 15th, staff will
ask Council to select a preferred altemative. Once Council decides on a
preferred altemative, staff will begin the implementation process. This
could include addiiional research to answer questions relating to the
prefened action and would include developing proposed code revisions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has three recommendations: 1)
lmplement new design guidelines regardless of the prefened altemative;
2) Out of the three alternatives, staff is recommending alternative 3
"eliminate GRFA'and modify site coverage to prevent homes from
becoming significantly larger; 3) lf altemative 1 should be chosen. then
staff recommends that it apply only to existing homes built before the
date this policy would go into effect.
Development Review lmprovement Process (DRlp). (15 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Update and overview of DRlp
effort and review schedule. Approve/Modify the proposed
problem/opportunity statement, goals, and givens for the DRlp process.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: See proposed DRlp problem/opportunity
statement and proposed goals and givens.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed
problem/opportunity statement, goals, and givens for the DRlp process.
Information Update. (10 mins.)
Council Reports. (10 mins.)
Other. (10 mins.)
Site Visit - An appeal of a variance approval (4-2; Moffet and pratt
opposed, Aasland absent) made by the Planning and Environmental
Commission on February 1 0, 1997. The applicant was granted a front
setback variance of 5' - 6" to allow an additional one-car garage to be
constructed at 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, VailVillage 7th
Filing. Appellant: Diana Donovan. (30 mins.)
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCTL:Visit site.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: See the attached staff memo and other
materials for a comprehensive overview of the appeal.
Site Visit -A Town Council call-up of a planning and Environmental
Commission unanimous approval (6-0) of a major exterior afteration
located at the Creekside Building, 229 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 58.
VailVillage 1st Filing. Applicant: MichaetDitch. (10 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Visit site.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On March 24,1997, the pEC approved,
with three conditions, a request for a major exterior alteration to allow for
1,050 square feet of an existing deck area to be enclosed. See the
attached staff memo to the PEC, dated March 24, 1997, for a complete
description of the request.
Adjournment - 5:30 p.m.13.
al
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING STARTTIIIIIES BELOW:
(ALL rMes ARE AppR"i'Tl.
iT:rr*rro oHANGE)
THE NEXTVAIL TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSTON
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,4El97, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. lN TOV COUNCTL CHAi|BERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,4/15/97, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 P.M. tN Tov couNctL GHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGUI.AR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,4/15/97, BEG|NN|NG AT 7:30 P.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.il|||l
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332voice
or 479-2356 TDD for information.
C:\AGENOAWS
\
- a ^{tt e+ 1., -.sc+6a.t cAziqnalro^*
-oq.*u.n tt
Nz' 4
Tec,t &e,eb--
&n.,^-Q
,/ 9-7Var/ o-. -c,;sr'ao'Q-
6'.^* ,l Spec;.9 }.-*lt4-
l/-J:k;p u>1 4ol ;ll*s*Jag
- *41 ;,"Fci.4
' /r+ ;j lro{ utn,'n',,r-' t (.['iL
- 4 t,.& ,.-*illl nq{' *J a.tt&s pL'a frO'.
- 2."*c.rQ 6.xs{n'o"od Ton A, .hJ $|.sdt
- fi,-,
. .r2 c-Jur';n
?x
wo.9J4,4 -//' ftJ^l
'r< a .o** ol /^*.
I
1l- @s Jz."='*-
o.J{h.J .u $L orla,n-f
,-.,'*d 4 l^[n" -
.-;-Q
t z- t6 - 76
/ -t3.?7
Z- ro-7Q
?- b-?n
3 -./-?7
#.bl.& ,-J.,'l z- /o- ??
-/^tt.l *-*.,q-/ -71
-
r'lr-f{ppl;a..{*^ D+ts :
S-hJ..06Q m\
FE< mcr*2 :
f,^t,.(--*n..9,..
IIt
It
lr-"a,
Au,r.
AK
{rf ho'*"- c..ec.ct
Z c,.a.r 9a,,1eS
f o". Qn"t {L*
A.*d"L C',,-9,.
/{oo F
.--r----
,*a,r,e j- 4- L.A -1--l^*
,t
a.F-
.-gt^zs. ad
+"t*-J.,t{.M,
@ a- grk--.-#*
@ - d-.- 4tr'+ -+(-J+--4 I *
O-xrL"rU6
,/A-A.-.atb
UazZ'
4l.qpL 4
acx.^t^;-'.
?."J't3
{-o
{*tt* o.-- ?- v -( et /1
t.
,t"elc;ry--w
o
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 4. 1997
SUBJECT: An appeal of a variance approval made by the Planning and Environmental
Commission on February 10, 1997. A front setback variance was granted to allow
an additional one-car garage to be construcled at 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5,
Block 5, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Appellant: Diana DonovanPlanner: Dirk Mason
I. SUBJECT PROPERW
Kelton project. Located at 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
II. STANDING OF APPELLANT
Staff believes the appellant has standing to file an appeal in this case as the appellant is an
adjacent property owner.
III. BACKGROUND
The applicants requested a lront setback variance of 5' - 6" to construct a garage addition of 206
sq. ft. on the subject property. This single{amily home currently contains 2 enclosed garage
spaces and this request would add a third. The allowable front setback for this site is 20 feet
and the proposal is for a 14' - 6'front setback . The Planning and Environmental Commission, at
their February 1 0, 1997 meeting, approved the setback variance with a 4-2 vote (Moffet and Pratt
opposed, Aasland absent) and made the following finding (see attached minutes and
transcription of the motion):
1. That the PEC finds practical site dilficulty in locating the garage in any other
location on this lot.
This site originally had two dwelling units, a single family structure with a detached two-car
qaragg and a secondary dwelling unit above the garage. The current structure consists of only
the original single family dwelling unit and has since attached the garage into a single structurd.
This structure also currently encroaches into he north side and rear sehacks by less than one
foot. This is a pre-existing nonconforming condition and is not affected by the pioposal.
IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL
The appellant is appealing the PEC decision approving the front setback variance. The appellant
has indicated the practical difliculty on the site is a self imposed hardship of having too miiry
cars. The appellant has referenced Chapter 18.62.060, Criteria and findings, ot th! Town of Vait
Municipal Code as justilication for overturning the variance approval. The consideration of
factors have been addressed by the appellant and are summarized as follows:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
Appellant response:
Many neighbors have more cars than garage space available. Therefore, they park in
the paved areas in front of their homes. Parking vehicles on the street is not a regular
occurrence, most olten occurring in the summer. Grounds for a variance is not the
number of cars a property owner possess.
Staff response:
Staff believes that providing enclosed parking for residential units is a benefit to the
neighborhood. Most homes constructed in this neighborhood have two-car garages.
Eight homes have access off Homestake Circle. Seven of these homes have two-car
garages and the eighth has a one-car garage. Additionally, the adjacent properties to this
site meet the required front setbacks. Statf believes that the requested variance would
not be in harmony with the structures in the vicinity, and would be a grant of special
privilege.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement
of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without
grant of special privilege.
Appellant response:
All of the adjacent properties have irregular shaped lots, thus making this property similar
to the neighborhood. The degree of relief could have been reduced by shortening the
garage, however, this was not included in the motion made by the PEC. The variance
criteria requires the minimum relief necessary where a hardship is lound.
Stafl response:
Staff believes that the layout and orientation of the existing structure do not make this site
unique. The site exhibits no physical characteristics or constraints which constitute a
hardship, therefore, statf believes the proposal would be a grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and tratlic lacilities, public lacilities and utilities, and public safety.
Appellant response:
Several letters reterenced the issue of snow removal and parking on the street. The
narrowing ol the street in the winter is due to property owners pushing snow into the
street rather than storing the snow on the property. Snow storage can take place on-site.
Setback areas are often used for snow storage and should not be diminished.
Staff response:
Staff concurs with the comment that setback areas can be utilized for snow storage to
reduce the effori necessary for the Town of Vail to remove additional snow. The Zoning
Code requires on-site snow storage areas. Public safety could be compromised due td
the additional amount of snow placed in the Town of Vail right-of-way. The proposed
garage will reduce the available snow storage on-site. Staff believes that this proposal
has minimal impact on light and air, however, it may have impacts on adjaceni pr6perties
and the right-of-way due to the reduction in snow storage.
Other issues:
Staff believes the nature of this variance is very similar to the Campisi variance on Sandy Lane in
Potato Patch. The specific appeal was different, however, the hardship illustrated for boin
properties were self imposed. The Town Council upheld the Planning and Environmental
Commission's denial of the site coverage variance with a unanimous vote in that case.
Also, it appears in this case that all, of the PEC members were contacted by the applicant for the
variance request. The PEC must act as an impartial quasi-judicial body when reviewing a
variance application and, therefore, these contacts by the applicant and may have unfairly and
inappropriately biased the PEC.
Staff can find no justification for the hardship based on the Zoning Code criteria for granting a
variance.
The appellant has also provided additional information for the appeal, which is attached.
V. REOUIRED ACTION
Uphold/Overturn/Modify the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a 5' - 6"
front setback variance.
The Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with Section 18.66.030 (5)
shown below:
5. Findings, The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of
fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of
fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the
requirements of this title have or have not been met.
Further, if the Town Council chooses to uphold or modily the PEC approval of this variance, the
Town Council shall consider the following factors and make the following findings related to the
granting of a variance:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities,
and public safety.
B. The Town Council shall make the following findings before granting a variance:
'l . That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
irnprovements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the tollowing reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone,
c. The stricl interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Town Council overturn the Planning and Environmental
Commission's approval of a 5' - 6" front setback variance and recommends that the Town
Council make the following findings:
'1 . That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 18
(Zoning) have not been met.
2. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations On other properties classilied in the same district.
3. There are no exceptions, extraordinary circumstances, or conditions that are
applicable to this site that apply generally to other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential zone. In addition, any hardships which have been
presented, have been self imposed.
4. The strict interpretation, or enforcement of the specified regulation does not
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential district.
F:\every one\pBcvnemo\kslton.304
7
Submitted by the appe
o
llant,Diana Donovan.
I.I. NATUITD OF APPI]AT,
According to the draft minutes of the February 10, 1997 Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting, the motion to approve the request does not rneet the requirements
of Chapter I 8.62.060 Criteria and findings: the motion includes no criteria or findings.
The motion refers to 'the plan" which by itself can not show an application meets the
criteria. There are three findings essential to the granting ofa variance and not one of
thenr is referred to in the motion.
The practical difficulty on the site is really an inconvenience due to a self-imposed
hardship of having too many cars. A self-imposed hardship is not a finding for a variance
and "inconvenience" is referenced in 18.62.010.A as follows: "Cost or inconvenience to
the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for
granting a variance."
The majority of PEC simply ignored their responsibility to review specific factors and
make the findings required to grant a variance.
The factors to consider are:
I. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE TO OTHER EXISTING
OR POTENTIAL USES AND STRUCTURES IN THE VICINITY.
Steinbergs, Giordanos and Donovans all have more cars than garage space,
Steinbergs and Giordanos park in the paved areas in front of their homes. The Donovans
stack the cars in front ofthe garage: never less than three and most often more. The
Keltons are the only ones who park on the street and that is not a regular occurrence,' most often in the summer and seems to be because it is easier to leave a car in the street
than juggle cars in the driveway. Parking on the street is a choice, not a necessity. Even if
they had four residents and seven cars it would not be grounds for a variance.
2, TILE DEGREE TO WHICH RELIEF FROM THE STRICT AND LITERAL
INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF A SPECIFIED REGULATION IS
NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBILITY AND UNIFORMITY OF
TREATMENT AMONG SITES IN THE VICINITY ORTO ATTAIN THE
OBJECTIVES OF THIS TITLE WITHOUT GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE.
All ofthe adjacent properties have irregular shaped lots, Several suggestions were
made to decrease the "degree" of the requested relief. Amsden suggested "a shorter
length" to minimize the encroachment and Morter suggested l7' 4" but that was not
included in the motion.
7 Submitted by the aRRe$, Diana Donovan.
3. THE EFFECT OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ON LIGHT AND AIR,
DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
FACILITIES, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY.
Several letters refer to snow removal and parking on the street. The narrowing of
the street in the winter is due to individual properties pushing their snow into the street
instead of storing it on the property. Most often the setbacks serve to meet the
requirement that snow storage be accommodated on your property so setbacks should not
be diminished. It is illegal to park on the street no matter what the reason and is not
grounds for granting a variance particularly when a driveway and double garage are
available on site .
The PEC must make three specific findings and they mention none. It is not possible to
make those furdings for the above stated reasons. Any "practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship" is really only inconvenience and not allowed as a basis for a variance.
All ofthe reasons given by the applicant as reasons for granting the variance "apply
generally to other properties" that are adjacent. A third garage would give them privileges
not "enjoyed by the owners of" adjacent properties.
Please call ifthere are any questions.
r
Submitted by the upp.rro?, Diana Donovan.
There are other real issues that are not the basis for an appeal but have everything to do
with why our process is criticized. I hope they will be addressed by council.
I was at PEC all day but left when they adjoumed for supper feeling more than certain that
there was no basis for a variance, based on my 14 years on PEC.
The following comrnents respond to specific comments in the draft minutes in the order of
their occurrence.
Every board member stated they were contacted by Morter or the Keltons, It is clear
from the letters that the neighbors were also contacted. My calls from Morter and the
Keltons were full of inaccuracies that I would have accepted if I were not familiar with
PEC. Some of the inaccuracies I addressed above. In addition, I was told the staff
suggested that the garage be placed in the back yard but the applicant said that would
require a driveway and the loss of trees. The staffs purpose or responsibility, I believe, is
to show where the applicant has available building space and that it could be possible to
reconfigure their application. A common tact for applicants is to present the worst
concept imaginable as the alternate to the applicant's request. This really is a dishonest
approach especially when there are many alternatives. The variance procedure is meant to
be used when nothing else "legal" will work.
Threatening the loss of lrees is quite insulting since I have watched them cut down several
(4?) specimen spnrces the last couple years: they were the middle of a solid row between
the two remaining spruces on the west of the garage. I am now wondering ifthey were
just planning ahead. The few remaining spruces are either offtheir property or all but on
the property line. None are indicated on their plans.
. Not all the "facts" presented by the architect are facts. There are different ways of
looking at things but specific, hard facts must be accurate. Anything less is dishonest and
leads to mutual distrust.
NO PEC member can state in a public meeting that they are "uncomfortable with the
regulations" that they are swom to enforce. PEC may not ignore or give their own
interpretations to the judicial laws and process of the adopted plaruring regulations of the
Town of Vail. Lawyers love those comments! It was clear to me after watching and
listening to PEC for 4.5 hours on the lOth that several ofthe members have no
understanding of their sworn role as a Planning Commission member. It was equally clear
that on occasion that role is simply ignored. It was also quite clear to me why they chose
to ignore certain regulations on certain applications. They can not make exceptions
without substantiation.
There is no such thing as a little bit pregnant or a minor variance. Pregnant is pregnant
and a variance is a variance!
r
Submitted by the ,pp.rfil Diana Donovan.
No one ever HAS to park on the street in our neighborhood unless there is a party or
unusual situation. The actual inhabitants have plenty ofspace in driveways or garages.
We all occasionally park in the street for convenience only.
One of the rules of thumb we always used to understand all the legal language is that if
everyone on the street can qualif, for the variance then it is not a hardship but a regulation
that is meant to be observed.
It is also my observation that people who have been denied an application or who have a
particular conflict with a decision should not be appointed to the board. It appeared to me
that they are unable to see past that issue.
Please call ifyou have questions.
Sincerely.-Utp.*rUor4ooaJ
Diana Donovan
l0l4 Homestake Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
476-35t1
FAX476-2789
7',
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: February 10, 1997
SUBJECT: A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, located at '
1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing'
Applicant: Art and Elaine KeltonPlanner: Dirk Mason
I. BACKGROUNDAND DESCRIPTION OFTHE REOUEST
The applicants, Art and Elaine Kelton, are requesting a front setback variance ofapproxim-ately.
5'-6', id allow for a 14'-6" front setback, in orcier to construct a garage addition of 206 sq. ft. This
site is currently improved with a two-story single family structure with a 452 sq. ft. two-car
garage.
This site originally had two dwelling units, a single family structure with a detached two-car
garage and secohOary dwelling unit above. The current structure consists ol only the original
iingle lamily dwelling unit and has since attached the garage into a single structure'
This site currently meets the Town ol Vail Municipal Code's off-street parking requirements by
providing 3 parkihg spaces. The current parking regulations do not require enclosed off-street
iarking ior iesiOentiai units. However, enclosed pait<ing is encouraged by allowing a 600 sq. ft.
credit for enclosed parking on this site.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Use: Single-Family residence
Lot Size: 11,983 sq. tl.
Standard Allo'ved Existino Prooosed
GRFA: 3,421 sq. tt.' 2,888 sq. ft. 3'029 sq' ft.
Site Corerage: 2,397 sq. ft. (207.) 1 ,98+ sq. ft. (16.5%) 2'352 sq. ft. (1 9.67")
Landscape area: 7,190 sq. ft. (607") 9,226 sq. tl. (77%l 8'701 sq. fl' C/3e/")
Seibacks:
Flont: 20' 24'-11" 14'6"
Sijes: 15' 14'-2" (nodh) & 20'4'(south) nlc
Rear: 15' 14'-7" nlc
Parking: 3 spacas requir€d 4 spaces (2 Enclosed) 6 spaces (3 enclosed)
' Includes 425 sq. ft. credit
'!oo
III. CRITERN AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.62.060, Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code' the
Cbmmunity Development Department recommends denial of the requested front setback
variance. The recommendation for denial is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationshap of the requested variance to other existing or
potentlal uses and structures in the viclnity.
Staff believes that providing enclosed parking for residential units is a
benefit to the neighborhood' Most homes constructed in this
neighborhood have two-car garages' Eight homes have access otf
Hoirestake Circle. Seven oitnese homes have two-car garages and the
eighth has a one-car garage. Additionally, fre adjacent properties to this
siie meet the required front setbacks. Staff believes that the tequested
variance would iot be in harmony with the structures in the vicinity'
Z. The degree to which rellef from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a speclfied regulation is necessary to achieve
compatlbility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the obiectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
staff believes that the layout and orientation of the existing structure do
not make this site uniqud. The site exhibits no physical characteristics or
constraints which constitute a hardship' therefore, staff believes the
proposal would be a grant of special privilege'
3. Ths etfect of the requested variance on llght and air, dlstributlon of
populatlon, transponation and traflic facllltles, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff believes that this proposal has minimal impact on light and air'
however, it is not significant enough to effect adjacent properties and the
right of way. This pioposal does not have any impact on the other lactors
of consideration.
B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the followin9 findings
before granting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unneoessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this tite.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstiances or conditions
applicable to thb same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The sfict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive ine applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in fte same district'
IV. STAFF RECOIIMENDATION
The Community Development Department statf recommends denlal of the applicants'
lront setback variance request subject to the lollowing findings:
1. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsist6nt witfr tne timiAtons on other properties classified in the same
district.
2. That there are not exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to this site that do not apply generally to other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District.
3. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation will
not deprive fie apiticant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
llevcyoneFecVnemos\kelton.21 0
l. o,ua* NATT.NAL O
FO REST
UNDARY
EtPri {-s}toP
..'
. u1l:
TOWN OF VAIL
MAINT. SHOP
INT€RSTATE 70
VAIL VILLAGE 8th
NATURE
CENTER
60,
620
SOCCER FIELO
TRACT A
\IL VILLAGE 7rh. FIL]NG
-is*t-"F-
-
Qll1ffi-;*f{' I i fr--:rE', n | "\ Iit H i t9' I
lili\l
| ..1s AI r -i.
\r
Irli
)'
I$iI
tg
il
il
1l
$l
fl
$
tr
$I
l
3
d
tt
)lht
r*ft$s
{[
-Jtlnrr.rl.
$[
?tl
Tilg
ttt ll
il
$l
Ell
9tltr
o o
?*,*7 Z Pqz
:l
I
lAt;Lrr1(zda,,)
/0// t ;/.)
la 39vd NvAtI{0o/No9vl'lAfNoH
I
ttt: /'t-"r* "dJ^J Qan'baczt a* /N/
aa'r- e'uh'dz-6 -/^t *
hr^' 4.4r* a,te) woutdt)<-
% rfu t rD tu^;'^, ; y"'"> Prfft a'42-)
e,/".t"IaL -
-lrL^-dtrrrt a/z/r'd {o -lu *-t 4*M;,r;'hh. Jt *,De a/,#d,L W ;
grua-"b { n4u'*Z /rr;rrf-f, /" qln^t -frtaiUa'ua*'u-
/d^' "t *"ta+ @ ryf+ ru'*, Y ryrc-
&' qMA a/ *J1r' uau-ir'rt-u-t'
e^rffiurwrta^)
6ALZgLVAL6T 6t.zz L66llzrlrg
ruy"mftlOfi[ffipi
DONNA GIORDANO
1107 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
Mr. Dirk Mason
Town of Vail
Community Development Department
75 So. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Mason:
The Keltons have shown me the plans for their proposed garage at 1034 Homestake
Circle, which I find both workable and in keeping with the feeling of the Golf Course.
As a neighbor,(we share backyards) I enthusiastically support their request for a
variance .
I do, however, strongly object to the alternative ofputting a garage in the backyard
behind their existing East garage, as it would require the cutting of trees, and be unsightly
for us as we enjoy the use ofthe decks on the bacl<side ofour home all year.
g'J*
oo
^t ei e\n [o o{2 o€ '(*€
.!L€:-:re,^l r7-Aa$q L &o D--5cai! €-l-1li--qte---LN- *-lg-
&lqg*o. , eLb!3*-
,'Asr<rJ6 Fott-c-€. \* AS>,'
Cos
),oJ9 o .9ze J
vcf e A*,cl q (.J |-
'/
\ rrgtL(:t r(
L-E Y t q.te A-rt> At-Re
'9 {trr,46c-_ __q-ltlt{.L}_
@:t ircetr
e$ L.,*n.e t.-lher^,-Vt- [er--Fo,n\\ 5
eCe99t f,.l , hot" h'ry fb
b-.i""tr-
kL v A.(L#.S {er.s o^\ 9,
e- sfra"-t
rJ clJ A<-e L otoJ,
:ir oJ a^ d wottzg
z.t{-rtclcS J.
t ^ tltaalz^Jl 0-,p<>9 ,-\1Ap--<- \No-ft-
)\r*..4 onJ {1^o:\ceet pr"o<r-'tb Qt-wtph
oo
S Vzat,
4'* '\9 A.J
Z-rle sorZ-€ "rb v\Ad- oa- -<*L FJs i9h bo<l+ooo
lo"raStJ<"
fu,rn_- -
tturr,''.r L*l.n &v
Grrr*t
loq a-ck
o 6t,f
(eL',- ++b--+bfb
,{,q-r/ /\*'-'{'/''14" 'q .Z/r.4-/- -=3.7_:7/2- -27'L'/-2'z'zz'z-e'', 4 "
-/*;Z'C *- )'J";-''y'L?t-r.fu4 zre
3/-*O,t;;;-'{4'-*'?/tu
,*'z',b ' ,,,, ,?,e-/z-.,/2ut-a-7a-z-=o'u''-/ -/n-rL f*72* */Z?a---4,-/?4"3*%;.-&)*9r
-4'-4t'4*-/..*-44*z':?2"'"*kf @'"7-4h2*,4offiry-2"=7
4/b -fl 4^.2'<-- "2'"-@t^-2;7fVe'' -, t
-z4Z';?7zzz2fz-Zr-z*'"-*<(-z/*4'/za'-/z /ff".Z- tr"'- .f"%-* -'//^(-
;;/,4*-*z- 2/4-" ff -n fu--
,ti,ffi.2", ;;;' -n /B-'oL-e '/''2"'
ZZ'-2r' )"t -z"z(1"/"-^1 *- 47
,4a-t-ztl -z/z' 7e*'<-21'1r-ez--z'c?
4frtr,t/a-z ;52- -a'{-242 /'
-,n/u/., &a,-,;ffi2;fu' 4
I -'''za/t'-( 'r//
/J.,,.eo/? .///+- )'74o<a=n-. O
' ..a-''-af-a/2v'2"4' t -/oz'-n=' y
";t6ffi; /-+-'2e"2''''
z/1,-2.- tu*ffiryt ffi
:Z;;z-e- ,c--2,-L
7Za/-4/-/-z/--
'Z/aZE- .
oo
-Az-trzHcQ,4-z ,..t -t 2&'Wffire
SAM B. COOK
238 MAOISON STRE ET
JerreRsoru CtrY. Mrssounr
February 6, t997
Mr. Dirk Mason
Town of Vail
Community Development Departrnent
75 s. l'rontage Road West
Vail, colorado 81657
Re: Requested variance for garage at LO34 Homestake Circle
Dear Mr. Mason:
As a neighbor adjacent to Honestake circle, I strong).y support the
Keltonts-request for a variance in order to build a third garage.
Parking on Homestake and Eagles Nest Circle is al-ways very l-irnited'
particularJ-y in the winter, and to be able to put another car
inside a garage would be helpful to us all.
The garage will be situated in an area where, I understand, there
never has been any snow stored.
(1012 East EaglesVaiI, Colorado
Nest Circle
816s7)
sBc/pg
Thank you,
FIL T
3. A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage' located at
1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing'
Applicanl Art and Elaine Kelton
Plantier: Dirk Mason
Dirk Mason gave an overview of the staff memo and said that staffwas recommending denial' as
they believed-that this was a grant of special privilege. Dirk said that they. had received 5 letters;
one io opposition and 4 in favor, however, two of the letters came from the same property'
Greg Moffet disclosed for the record, that he was contacted regarding this request'
Greg Amsden said he was contacted.
John Schofield said he was contacted by Jim Morter.
GeneUselton said he was contacted.
Diane Golden said she was contacted.
Henry Pratt said he was contacted.
Jim Morter, with Morter Architects, pleaded the Kelton case by stating that Art and Elainc Kelton
with their two daughters had a total of 7
"utt
used by the whole family, with 3 of them on the
property at all times. Jim stated that the properly was originally zoned in 1973. The reasonable
alten atiues, suggested by the PEC, were-neither desirable by the Keltons or the neighborhood'
He then showed illusnations of the two alternate locations. He explained the first as being a
tandem arrangement that would take out a grove ofaspens andlhe second alternate location was
a tandem arrangement taking out an existing spruce ftee' Jim felt it was unreasonable to take out
landscaping. Iie said both iltemates wouldn't work from a functional standpoint, as they usethe
.r,
"urry
iuy and the alternates would be for storing the cars. He said the backyard is shared
visually by the neighbors and the neighbors were not in favor of either tandem arrangement' Jim
said the applicant ielt they had a hardship, regarding desfioying the rytotl landscaping, as the
reason fo; gpnting a vari;nce. He said, regataing the tbree findings that-l' a grant of special
privilege --SSW oith"sites were larger than this site in the zone distict; 2. that the neighbors
wanted to see this happery and 3. - iipresented a practical difficulty to maintain desirable living
standards.
Planniog and Environmental Commission
Minutes
Fobruary'10, 199?
cCIP y
l.I
Dirk Mason said, regarding the proposed locations with the garagc in the-rcar, that staff hadn't
evaluated any proposal *iit', u tuna"rn garage. He clarificd that 7 out of the 9 lots wcrc lcss than
15,000 sq. ft. and many were betwecn approximately I1,500 sq' ft' to I l'000 sq' ft'
Jim Morter said that another house in the neighborhood had violated three of the setbacks and
violations did exist.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was none'
Diane Golden said she felt the garage proposal was within reason and that it wouldn't look
obtrusive. She said she felt unJomioriutG with the regulations, as the Town wanted to get the
cars off the street. She felt this was a minor variance and she would approve it.
Henry pratt said that there was a lot in what Diane said, however, he had a hard time getting past
the special privilege finding' He suggested putting a heated parking pad in'
John Schoheld shared Diane's philosophy. He demonstrated the practical difficulties of parking
enforcemcnt and said that thcy did not want to be overly restrictive whcn a goal was to gct cars
offthe street and under covcr'
Dirk Mason read from Scction 18.62.010 regarding a practical difficulty and how it related to thc
size of thc sitc or a site that had physical limitations.
Gene Uselton said he was in favor of this rcquest, since Section 18.62.010 provided justification'
Hc stated that this was not a grant of special privilege'
Mike Mollica mentioned staff had uscd existing, mature landscaping as a hardship in thc past'
Greg Amsden said thc existing landscaping made it difficult, thcreforc, he was in favor of this
request.
Greg Moffet stated that there was a practical diffrculty, however, he still thought it was a grant of
speclal privilege, especially when there were practical alternatives. He stated that the setbacks
were there for a reason und h" didn't see a compelling reason to go into the setback' He said that
if this was granted, he didn't see any way not to grant everyone-the same in Homestake Circle'
Gene Uselton said if other people were able to show a hardship, they could have the same'
Greg Moffet stated the PEC would see everyone wanting the same and then a front setback
wouldn't matter.
Mike Mollica said if this site didn't have a garage, it would be different, but he said that a 3-car
gaxage was pushing the enveloPe.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
Februry 10, 1997 15
Greg Moffet said the applicant could put in a covercd carport'
Jim Morter stated the carport would cncroach into the setback'
Mike Mollica said a carport would fall under the deck category, as it was opcn on three sidcs'
Diane Golden asked if the applicant would consider a heated carport.
Jim Morter said the Kelton's would not be interested in a heated pad. He agrecd with Gene's
argument. Jim advised to use the rules to improve the neighborhood and that particular
neighborhood needed what was being done.
Greg Amsdon said, after hearing Greg Moffet's comments, that a carport would work.
Gene Uselton felt that the neighborhood would object to a carport, over another garage'
Greg.Moffet reminded everyone that the PEC was constrained to act within the code.
John Schofield moved that we approve the request to allow for a guage, in accordance with thc
plans and that the PEC found a practical diffrculty on the site'
Gene Uselton seconded the motion'
Greg Amsden asked what thc minimum rcquirement was for thc length of a garage.
Dirk Mason said there was no minimum requirement.
Mikc Mollica explained that it could be as srnall as l6', sincc it was not a required space'
Greg Amsden sald a shorter length would minimize the encroachmcnt into the setback'
Jim Morter suggested going from l9'4" to 17'4" in length'
Dirk Mason said if it was flush with the front of house, it would encroach 2' into the setback'
The motion passed 4-2 with Greg Moffet and Henry Pratt opposed'
Planning and Env ironmental Commi ssion
Minutes
February 10, 1997 L6
PEC Meeting. February 10. 1997
Transcription of motion on Item #3, Kelton Front Setback Variance Request
(Tape 3, - l8l3)
John Schofield - made a motion to "approve the request in accordance with the plans
submitted with the Staffmemo.
Greg Moffet - " John, just because this has been a little bit contentious, would you .,.
John Schofield - "speci$ that the square footage is ...
Greg Moffet - " no, actually, would you specify that you don't find the special privilege...
that the ..
John Schofield - " I would definitely speoiff that we find a practical difficulty in locating the
garage in any other location on this lot."
Gene Uselton - seconded the motion.
Discussionfollowed regarding minimizing the encroachment in the setback by reducing the
lenglh ofthe garage.
Greg Moffet - " Greg, as I understand it, are you asking John to amend his motion?"
GregAmsden- "No,.."
The motion passed 4-2,with Greg Moffet and Henry Pratt opposed.
o
P.C.HAYES, PHILLPS & MALONEY,
Altorneys at bw
Suite 450, The Market Center
1350 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202'1517
(303) 8254444
Telecopier: (303) 825-1269
Jobn E. Hayes
Herbert C. Phillips
James S. Maloney
M. Susan l.ombardi
Bradley N. Shefrin
Corey Y. Hoffrnann
Kendra L. Carberry
EX PARTE CONTACTS A}.ID QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISIONS
WHAT IS AN EX PARTE CONTACT? Broadly defined, an ex parte contact is any
written or verbal conrmunication initiated outside of a regularly noticed public hearing
between an official with decision-making authority and one or more of the parties, but not
all of the partias, concerning a particular subject matter which is under, or which is about to
become under, consideration by that official, and which seeks either to influence, or Present
information relating to, that maner which is the subject of the decision. The term is usually
used in a courtroom context; the judge cannot discuss a case with either party or their
attorney without the other party and the attorney being present. Thc term is also equally
applicable to any quasi-judicial matter pending before a local governmental body' An ex
paire conract miy include discussing an upcoming hearing or decision with the staff.
wnY ARE EX PARTE CONTACTS BEFORE MAKING A QUASI-JUDICIAL
DECISION IMPROPER? .
l. All parties are enritled to have the matter heard by an impartial person or body.'At the very least, ex parte contacts, whether the contacting person is an applicant or a
protestant, call into question the impartiality of the decision maker.
Z. Every quasi-judicial decision must be supported by findings of fact, and the
findings of fact must be based solely upon the evidence as it appears in the record of the
proceeding. The record of the proieeding consists only of matters presented at the hearing'
not anything presented before or after the hearing. Thercfore, to have a defensible record,
only evidence presented during the hearing, on the record of the hearing, may be relied upon
in reaching the body's decision.
9/t0t96 - ZBw
EXPAEIECON
3' In some instances, the parties have the right of cross-examination of theopposing side. fiey cannot cross-examine an ex parte contact
4' In the evenl :i? pin{ challenges the finar decision, you can be sure any exparte cornmunications will be included rs o* of the grounds roiieie"sing the decision.
WIIAT DO I DO IF SOMEONE ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT ME BEFORE AEEARING?
l' Stoo the Person. Ifit is a verbal contact, advise the person that you are sittinsas a judge in the matter and you cannot listen to or review anything ;;;;il"'il;;;';;the hearing.
2' Disclose the contact. At the next public meeting or prior to the hearing on thepublic record, advise the remaining members or ttre uoara unJ"r],,;pT,t-ies of the contact, yourresponse' and whether,or.notyouthink you can make an i-priia a."ision based on theevidence presented at the hearing despite the contact.
3.*.."...". ,,,.".,,cr urc .Ex rane uo'tacj Kequires Abstention. An ex parte
;:T._,::I"t:it o ururt nor,"no require you ro absrainfrom vodng on the issue. Each indi-viduar "on,u.i,nuri;;;;;'H; iffi#,#,i"#:f,#it affects your impartiality or ability ,o lo^iau trtr *rti.r r"-irij,'*t ettre, ir creares anappearance of impropriety, whether it creates a conflict su.rt trrullou cannot participate inthe decision-making process, or wherher it orherwise
"1f"..r, q,; ;d;, of rhe parties seekingthe decision to "firndamental fairness" o, du" pro""* in the decision-making proceedings.
4.Consider Adoptinl?*ilol:l*9'!li"i !3T.',r-i"o"p. rt is difficult ro re[ a neighbor or a
ir:yr*:lj*::.::^:y-"lt"nio-*_"uout_i*,u"ril;;tb";;ffi il:,,iJ,,ft:il*,"llT j":Tjl,:T:. jl":iur.,"""o.^il'r_,"T;;H;,':##ffii?[:Xff*
ffi1Ji*:':Jl,:]:::T,::-:"'".:':i."i**'*;i#1ffi;:ffi ;,H1J"TI#;l:l'*i*:.:ff iT:l:f^.gt,*ft ;.rh;;";;;Gi"#;HHffi e"::ffiil:Hf::'" *1:T1.:ll':Te *:. '"^";l; ";';L"ir"" " i"iil'o';5;*'T, ltry",mi?l:ip".*:pqtrl:"oradministrari""irru*r.-rijJ*iffiffi rn?ffi:sure all board members handleix p.rt" .ont..ts in the same manner.
9/JO/96 - 2:IEpa
EXPA RTECON
o -t
5. Seibert Circle. (15 mins.)
Nancy Sweeney
Kathy Langenwalter ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide recommendation for
selection of an artist to design the art piece for Seibert Circle.
6. Vote for and Appoint One Local Licensing Authority member. (5 mins.)
7. Vote for and Appoint Two Art In Public Places Board members. (5 mins.)
8. An appeal of a variance approval (4-2; Moffet and Praft opposed,
Dirk Mason Aasland absent) made by the Planning and Environmental Commission
on February 10, 1997. The applicant was granted a front setback
variance of 5' - 6" to allow an additional one-car garage to be constructed
at 1034 Homestake Circte/Lot 5, Btock 6, Vait Viilage 7th Filing.
Appellant: Diana Donovan. (40 mins.)
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCTL: Uphotd / modify / overturn the
PEC's approval of the variance request.
BACKGROUND MTIONALE: See the aftached staff memo and other
materials for a comprehensive overview of the appeal.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council
overturn the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a 5'
- 6" front setback variance and recommends that the Town Council make
the following findings:1. That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements
of Title 18 (Zoning) have not been met.2. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.3. There are no exceptions, extraordinary circumstances, or
:t#l?fi ililifi ,xy3:*:;"".9ilf ,yil:ifJlf;:"#:tl;
addition, any hardships which have been presented, have been
self imposed.4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
does not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of
other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential district.
9. A Town Council call-up of a Planning and Environmental Commission
Lauren Waterton unanimous approval (6-0) of a major exterior alteration located at the
Creekside Building, 229 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 58, Vail Village
1st Filing. Appticant: Michaet Ditch. (30 mins.)
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCTL: Uphotd / modify / overturn the
PEC's approval of the major exterior alteration request.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: On March 24,1997, the pEC approved,
with three conditions, a request for a major exterior alteration to allow for
1,050 square feet of an existing deck area to be enclosed. See the
attached staff memo to the pEC, dated March 24, 1992, for a complete
description of the request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recornmends that the Town Council
uphold the Plannirrg and Environmental Commission,s approval of a
major exterior alteration.
10. Town Manager Report. (10 mins.)
11. Adjournment, 10:10 p.m.
ft, )a
VAILTOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL ,|, I997
7:30 P.tl. lN TOV COUNCIL CHAiIBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Times of items are approximate, subiect to change, and cannot be relied upon to
determine at what time Gouncil will consider an item,
1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (10 mins.)A. Vail Youth Award Presentation to Alissa Feni and Chad Sewell.
2. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1997, first reading, an ordinance amending
Dan stanek section 15.02.020(c) of the Municipal code of the Town of Vailto
Provide for the Adoption of an Annual Elevator Inspection Fee. (15
mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Approve/deny/modiff Ordinance
No. 7, Series of 1997, on first reading.
BAOKGROUND RATIOMLE: lt is appropriate to consider an increase in
the elevator permit fees and the building department recommends
adopting those set forth by Northwest Colorado Council of Govemments.
Consistent with other provisions of our Code these fees once cunently
adopted will be maintained with the schedule of construction fees in the
building division of the Community Devetopment Department. Future
increases in fees will be adopted by resolution.
srAFF RECOMMENDATTON: Approve ordinance No.7, series of 1997.
on first reading.
3.Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1997, first reading of an Ordinance
Tom Moorhead Establishing a Traffic Ofiense for Failure to Provide a Complying policy or
Certificate of Self-insurance. (15 mins.)
AcroN REOUESTED oF couNcrL: Approve/Deny/Modifi ordinance
8, Series of 1997, on first reading.
BACKGROUND MTTONALE: Councit directed the Town Attomey to
prepare'a proof of insurance ordinance consistent wilh that provided in
the State Model Traffic Code. This will enable violations of this ordinance
to be prosecuted in the Town of Vail Municipal Court.
srAFF RECOMMENDATTON:Approvar of ordinance No. g, series of
1997, on first reading.
4- Resolution No. 13, Series of 1997, a Resolution Approving and Adopting
Larry Grafel the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, which is an amenJment to the -
Todd oppenheimer 1985 Ford Park and Donovan park Master plan. (15 mins.)
Pam Brandmeyer
George Ruther AcrloN REQUESTED oF couNclL: consider Resolution No. 13.
Series of 1997.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Foilowing a two year process involving
leaseholders and stakeholders, whicfr was facilitated by staff, the 19SZ
Ford Park Master Plan is completed and presented to Town council for
approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATTON:Approve Resotution No. 13, Series of't997.
FEB- 72-A7 FROIt ' TOV- Colt
o
.DEV.OEPT,
TOWNOF
A.
B.
c.
DAIEOFACTTON/DECISToN t Fof,rua-| /0, tQ?7
NAI\4E OF BOARD OR PERSON RENDERING T}TE DECISION/TAKING ACTION:p P/ann,i En vtl /u
D- NAMEOFAPPELLA}.{T(S):
2/ | |
ACTIOWDECISION BEING APPE,ALED:
rvtAILINc ADDRESS:- /0 /q hb n /al
PHYSICAI ADDRESS IN V.AIL:
8 tLs7
PROPERry IN V.A,IL:
E.
'(1b-'3stt
Page I of2
.FEE-12-97 11, O5 FROM. TOV-COm-DEV-DEPT.
v
PAGE 3/ I I
Docs tbis ipps.l invohe a spccif,c parccl of land? ,r/ -6rr4tcase providc the followurg inforurrtiou:
.,,
arc I'ur an adjrccot prcpaty o*ncr? Ycs -!1 nc'
--If no, give a &eild aplaaion of how you aro an "aggriat cd or advcrsely affccrt pccson.- "Aggricvcd or
advccrdy afrccted pcrson" moaos ary p€rson wbo wrll $fLr o advcrse efiocr ro ao intrrcsr proteuted or
fiutcacd by tfis titlc. 'lto rllcgcd advcrsc intcrcn orry bc sbarcd in comroo wi& otDec nrerrrbc$ of tbe
coeEutriry at largc b(|t Eldl cxceed ln dcgce tbe gcncral intrrcst i.u communiry good sbaral by rll pcrsons.
G. hqtd& tbc oatoes and adGeescs (botb pcrson's nuiling addrcss and propcrty's pby$cal addrcs in vail) of all
owncrs oflmpcrty whrcL ew tle rubjcct of tb" apcal and aU adjaceot propcrty own<lr (including popcrues
scpaard by a djfu'of-way, sDcan. or otber iff.ilcning barrtcrs). .AJso provide addresscd ard sa;pcd anvelops for
lactr prcpctty owncr ou tbc list
l{. ft scpantc $ccts of papcr, specrf tbc prmsc nsnrr" of rbc appcal, Ptcaso crtc qecific codo scctioos baviqg
rclevanc! to tb€ action bcing appcalcd
I. FEE: $0.00
to , g'704792q52
o
F.
Ptge2 of2
H. NATTJRE OFAPPEAI,
According to the draft minutes of the February 10, 1997 Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting, the motion to approve the request does not meet the requirements
of Chapter 18.62.060 Criteria and findings: the motion includes no criteria or findings.
The motion refers to'the plan" which by itself can not show an application meets the
criteria. There are three findings essential to the granting of a variance and not one of
them is referred to in the motion.
The practical difficulty on the site is really an inconvenience due to a self-imposed
hardship of having too many cars. A self-imposed hardship is not a finding for a variance
and "inconvenience" is referenced in 18.62.010.A as follows: "Cost or inconvenience to
the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for
granting a variance."
The majority of PEC simply ignored their responsibility to review specific frctors and
make the findings required to grant a variance.
The factors to consider are:
1. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE TO OTHER EXISTING
OR POTENTIAL USES AND STRUCTURES IN T}IE VICINITY.
Steinbergs, Giordanos and Donovans all have more cars than garage space.
Steinbergs and Giordanos park in the paved areas in front oftheir homes. The Donovans
stack the cars in front ofthe garage: never less than three and most often more. The
Keltons are the only ones who park on the street and that is not a regular occrurence,
most often in the summer and seems to be because it is easier to leave a car in the street
than juggle cars in the driveway. Parking on the street is a choice, not a necessity. Even if
they had four residents and seven cars it would not be grounds for a variance.
2. 'fIlF. DEGREE TO WHICH RELIEF FROM TT{E STzuCT AND LITERAL
INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF A SPECIFIED REGULATION IS
NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBILITY AND UNIFORMITY OF
TREATMENT AMONG SITES IN THE VICINITY OR TO ATTAIN TI{E
OBJECTIVES OF THIS TITLE MTHOUT GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE.
All ofthe adjacent properties have irregular shaped lots. Several suggestions were
made to decrease the "degree" of the requested relief. Amsden suggested "a shorter
length" to minimize the encroachment and Morter suggested 17' 4" but that was not
included in the motion.
3. THE EFFECT OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ON LIGHT AND AIR,
DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
FACILITIES, PI.]BLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY.
Several letters refer to snow removal and parking on the street. The narrowing of
the street in the winter is due to individual properties pushing their snow into the street
instead of storing it on the property, Most often the setbacks serve to meet the
requirement that snow storage be accommodated on your property so setbacks should not
be diminished. It is illegal to park on the street no matter what the reason and is not
grounds for granting a variance particularly when a driveway and double g€uage are
available on site .
The PEC must make thrree specific findings and they mention none. It is not possible to
make those findings for the above stated reasons. Any'fractical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship" is really only inconvenience and not allowed as a basis for a variance.
All ofthe reasons given by the applicant as reasons for granting the variance "apply
generally to other properties" that are adjacent. A third garage would give themprivileges
not "enjoyed by the owners of" adjacent properties.
Please call ifthere are any questions.
There are other real issues that are not the basis for an appeal but have everything to do
with why our process is criticized. I hope they will be addressed by council.
I was at PEC all day but left when they adjourned for supper feeling more than certain that
there was no basis for a variance, based on my 14 years on PEC.
The following comments respond to specific cornments in the draft minutes in the order of
their occurrence.
Every board member stated they were contacted by Morter or the Keltons. It is clear
from the letters that the neighbors were also contacted. My calls from Morter and the
Keltons were full of inaccuracies that I would have accepted if I were not familiar with
PEC. Some ofthe inaccuracies I addressed above. In addition, I was told the staff
suggested that the garage be placed in the back yard but the applicant said that would
require a driveway and the loss of trees. The staffs purpose or responsibility, I believe, is
to show where the applicant has available building space and that it could be possible to
reconfigure their application. A common tact for applicants is to present the worst
concept imaginable as the alternate to the applicant's request. This really is a dishonest
approach especially when there are nrany alternatives. The variance procedure is meant to
be used when nothing els€ "legal" will work.
Threatening the loss of trees is quite insulting since I have watched them cut down several
(4?) specimen spruces the last couple years: they were the middle of a solid row between
the two remaining spruces on the west of the garage. I am now wondering if they were
just plarming ahead. The few remaining spruces are either offtheir property or all but on
the property line. None are indicated on their plans.
Not all the "ftcts" presented by the architect are facts. There are different ways of
looking at things but specific, hard facts must be accurate. Anything less is dishonest and
leads to mutual distrust.
NO PEC member can state in a public meeting that they are 'bncomfortable with the
regulations" that they are sworn to enforce. PEC may not ignore or give their own
interpretations to the judicial laws and process of the adopted planning regulations of the
Town of Vail. Lawyers love those comments! It was clear to me after watching and
listening to PEC for 4.5 hours on the l0th that several oftle members have no
understanding oftheir swom role as a Planning Commission member. It was equally clear
that on occasion that role is simply ignored. It was also quite clear to me why they chose
to ignore certain regulations on certain applications. They can not make exceptions
without substantiation.
There is no such thing as a little bit pregnant or a minor variance. Pregnant is pregnant
and a variance is a variance!
No one ever HAS to park on the street in our neighborhood unless there is a party or
unusual situation. The actual inhabitants have plenty of space in driveways or gamges,
We all occasionally park in the street for convenience only.
One of the rules of thumb we always used to understand all the legal language is that if
everyone on the street can quali$ for the variance then it is not a hardship but a regulation
that is meant to be observed.
It is also my observation that people who have been denied an application or who have a
particular conflict with a decision should not be appofufed to the board. It appeared to me
that they are unable to see past tlrat issue.
Please call ifyou have questions.
Sincerelv."tili)Uor.1it)J
Diana Donovan
l0l4 Homestake Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
476-3511
FAX476-2789
A Prof€ssional CorDoration
143 East Meadow Drive
Crossroads at Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
970/476-5105
FAX 970/476-0710
MonrenAnclrECTS
February 26,1997
Mr. Dirk Mason
Community DeveloPment
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Hello Dirk,
Because of travel conflicts, I hereby request that the appeal of the front setback
variance granted by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission
on Monday, February 10,1997 for Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village Seventh Filing (the
Kelton Residence) be tabled from the Vail Town Council's meeting of March 4,
1997 to its meeting of April 1, 1997 .
Thank you for your cooperation.
-' --_-a
. Morter, FAIA
R ARCHITECTS
CIPI?CT,TDir,,,,4R 1 0 Bg7
FIL I COF Y
3. A request for a front setbaok variance to allow for a new garage' located at
1034 Homestake Circleilot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing'
Applicant Art and Elaine Kelton
Planner: Dirk Mason
Dirk Mason gave an overview of the staffmemo and said that staffwas recommending denial' as
they believdthat this was a grant of special privilege. Dirk said that they. had received 5 letters;
one in opposition and 4 in favor, however, fwo of the letters came from the same property'
Greg Moffet disclosed for the record, that he was contacted regarding this request'
Greg Amsden said he was contacted.
John Schofreld said he was contacted by Jim Moder'
GeneUselton said he was contacted.
Diane Golden said she was contacted'
Henry Pratt said he was contacted.
Jim Morter, with Morter Architects, pleaded the Kelton case by stating that Art and Elaine Kelton
with their two daughters had a total of 7 .ffi used by the whole family, with 3 of them on the
property at all timei. Jim stated that the property was originally zoned in 1973. The reasonable
altorratiu"s, suggested by the PEC, weroneither desirable by the Keltons or the neighborhood'
He then showed illustations of the two altemate locations. He explained the first as being a
tandem arangement that would take out a grove of aspens and th9 second altemate location was
a tandem arrangement taking out an existing spruce tree. Jim felt it was unreasonable to take out
landscaping. He said both alternates wouldn't work from a functional standpoint, as they use the
.*, .n.ry doy and the altemates would be for storing the cars. fle-said the backyard is shared
visually by the neighbors and the neighbors were nolin favor of either tandem arrangement' Jim
said the applicant felt they had a harJship, regarding destroying lhe ryhrr9 landscaping, as thc
reason foi granting a vari-ance. He sai4iegarding the three findings fhat-I. a grant of special
privilege --gSX ofth" sites were larger than this site in the zone district; 2' that the neighbors
wanted'to see this happen; and 3. - iipresented a practical difficulty to maintain desirable living
standards.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
Fobrr:ary 10, 1997 L4
Dirk Mason said, regarding the proposed locations with the garage in the-rear, that staff hadn't
evaluated any proposal ,"iin a t oA"* garage. He clarified that 7 out ofthe g lots were less than
15,000 sq. ft. and many were between approximately 11,500 sq' ft' to I l'000 sq' ft'
Jim Morter said that another house in the neighborhood had violated three of the setbacks and
violations did exist.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was none'
Diane Golden said she felt the garage proposal was within reason and that it wouldn't look
obtnrsive. She said she felt *io*fotiuUti with the regulations, as the Town wanted to get the
cars off the street. she felt this was a minor variance and she would approve it.
Henry pratt said that there was a lot in what Diane said, however, he had a hard time getting past
the special privilege finding. He suggested putting a heated parking pad in'
John Schofield shared Diane's philosophy. He demonstated the practical difficulties of parking
enforcement and said that they did not want to be overly restrictive when a goal was to get cars
offthe steet and under cover.
DirkMasonreadfromsection l8.62.0l0regardingapractical difficultyandhowitrelatedtothe
size of the site or a site that had physical limitations.
Gene Uselton said he was in favor of this request, since Section l8'62.010 provided justification'
He stated that this was not a grant of special privilege'
Mike Mollica mentioned staffhad used existing, mature landscaping as a hardship in the past'
Greg Amsden said the existing landscaping made it difiicult, therefore, he was in favor of this
request.
Greg Moffet stated that there was a practical diffrculty, however, he s]ilI thought it was a grant of
spec-ial privilege, especially when thlre were practical alternatives, He stated that the setbacks
were there for a reason uod tt" didn't see a compelling reason to go into the setback' He said that
if this was granted, he didn't see any way not to grant everyone the same in Homestake Circle'
Gene Uselton said if other people were able to show a hardship, they could have the same'
Greg Moffet stated the PEC would see everyone wanting the same and then a front setback
wouldn't matter.
Mike Mollica said if this site didn't have a garage, it would be different, but he said thal a3'car
garage was pushing the enveloPe'
Planni:rg and Environmental Commission
Minutes
February 10, 1997 I5
Greg Moffet said the applicant could put in a covered carport'
Jim Morter stated the carport would encroach into the setback'
Mike Mollica said a carport would fall under the deck category, as it was open on three sides'
Diane Golden asked if the applicant would consider a heated carport'
Jim Morter said the Kelton's would not be interested in a heated pad. He agreed with Gene's
argument. Jim advised to use the rules to improve the neighborhood and that particular
neighborhood needed what was being done.
Greg Amsden said, after hearing Greg Moffet's comments, that a carport would work'
Gene Uselton felt that the neighborhood would object to a carport, over another garage'
Greg Moffet reminded everyone that the PEC was constrained to act within the code.
John Schofield moved that we approve the request to allow for a gaxage' in accordance with the
plans and that the PEC found a practical diffrculty on the site'
Gene Uselton seconded the motion.
Greg Amsden asked what the minimum requirement was for the length of a garage.
Dirk Mason said there was no minimum requirement'
Mike Mollica explained that it could be as small as 16', since it was not a required space'
Greg Amsden said a shorter length would minimize the encroachrnent into the setback'
Jim Morter suggested going from l9'4" to l7'4" in length.
Dirk Mason said if it was flush with the fiont of house, it would encroach 2' into the setback'
The motion passed 4-2 with Greg Moffet and Henry Pratt opposed'
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minut€s
February 10, 1997 r.6
PEC Meeting. February 10. 1997
Transcription of motion on Item #3, Kelton Front Setback Variance Request
(Tape 3, - l8l3)
John Sohofield - made a motion to "approve the request in accordance with the plans
zubmitted with the Staffmemo.
Greg Moffet - '3 John, just because this has been a little bit contentious, would you ...
John Schofield - "speci$ that the square footage is ..,
Greg Moffet - '( no, actually, would you specify that you don't find the special privilege.'.
that the ..
John Schofield - " I would definitely specifr that we find a practical difficulty in locating the
garage in any other location on this lot."
Gene Uselton - seconded tle rnotion.
Discassionfollowed regarding minimizing the encroachment in the setback by reducing the
length ofthe garage.
Greg Moffet - " Greg, as I understand it, are you asking John to amend his motion?"
GregAmsden- "No..."
The motion passed 4-2,with Greg Mofet and Henry Pratt opposed.
ao
tDr'o^r
.'<,t{ u"e){-.
*,,t'1it, y'te+o,,-
a,,*,*/uhk / "ofr,
tta"J^L- , {avr, #/"q?f*e
{/oJ ?"*Je
P^/r N
Sl.', f#"y44J;r #4<--V7P'{zoQ
,u,or/ q fa*<.*ge
',.r/.'/, i.,{;* /F. {" qa
'rto/' o ,r*/ /"V*-//*"/%
/..1"772,
orrt'L*6a/
r&"j.
\-Ar '
&"0 :
6ns
y'""'
lvt, ,s,Utf^dr"J
//"{
-#'
.4o
*udu
a."?rq
# t/*,- y/d6A
,E'*ts/ -€J*o&4
/"/un
4
rz€tfu--
oa
q{.' &T
7uo- #i,de,-
k"le4 ?
\4,^
&r-t
4lrht'c*&+
.-?/ .cV7*A '-J"s
rw2.+e/ J"t ,\, p^Sq
'=,'\, 4.4hs.
e/7+n-<
o
K"&1^ '?ac y't"7zi
{/// Ao. rp-<-el*4 / 2&.'
/ - oflfo*- +. '#, \]o/ra,,r<.o L.o* 4 uro.^0d 6* c^.
e-*J.v5 .,f <po..J prrc&y - .ct\a.-r,* (u.;A
4 - /t l^t* 4 tl' a9poxa g1a,r.naa ct* -6
d^L Prtr1, /4/,latn-
' EQk's 4)eqt (.*."J
FEB_L6_L997 TL..N
sBc/pg
BCC: Elaine Kelton
d*to mcHrTEcrs
The garage vill be sj.tuated in
never has been any snor.t stored.
P.@.
sAM B. COOK
836 MAOISON STFIE ET
Jerr;nson Crrv. Mrssounl
february 6, L997
o,,cit"l
i.i '
Ur, Dirk Mason
Town of Vail
Connunity Developtrent Dgpartuent
75 S. Frontage Road Westvail, Colorado 8L657
Re: Requested variance for garalJe at 1.034 l:onestake Cj'rsle
Dear Mr. MaEon:
As a neigbbor adjacent to Hornestake circle, I strongly support the
Keltonrs requesC for a variance in order to build a thlrd garage.
Parking on Honestake and Eagles Nest Circle is always very linited'
partic-ularly in the winter, ald to be atle to put another car
inside a lJarage would be heIPf,uI to us aLI,
an area whet'e, I understand, tlrere
Thank Ytlut
.-,:-rrt i:i. -
! t.? '
(1012 East Eaglesvai!, Colorado
Nest Circle
816571
TOTAL P.02
Ddver: George
@
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
'LANNTNG
AND ENVTR'NMENTAL coMMrss.oJscndr
lasr rcviscd 2/6/e7 lr arn
Monday, FebruarY 10, 1997
AGENDA
Proiect Orientation / LUNCH - Communitv Development Department 11:30 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERSABSENT
Site Visits :
1 . Brooks - 1502 Buffehr Creek Road2. Swiss Chalel - 62 East Meadow Drive3. Austria Haus -242 East Meadow Drive
1:15 pm
Public Hearino - Town Council Ghambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a worksession to develop a prelerred alternative for Gross Residential
Floor Area (GRFA). (2:00 - 3:00 p.m.)
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Russ Forrest
2. A request lor a worksession with the Design Review Board for the establishment of
Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, located at242East Meadow Drive/on a
part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon PiercePlanner: George Ruther
3. A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, located at
1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
. Applicant: Art and Elaine KeltonI Planner: Dirk Mason
4. A request for a worksession to discuss variances from Sections 18.22.060 (Setbacks),
18.22.140 (Parking), 18.04.130 (Common Area) and 18.22.020 (Percentage of Accessory
Uses) to allow lor an entry addition at the Swiss Chalet, located at 62 East Meadow
Drive/Part of Lot K, Block 5-E, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Henry PrattPlanner: Lauren Waterton
O
Agcnda hst rcviscrl2/6'197 8 arn
5. A request for a major amendment to SDD # 29 to modify the planed building envelopes
and create 1 primary/secondary lot, located at 1502 Bulfehr Creek Rd./Tracts A-1 & A-2,
Parcel 2, Lions Ridge 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Harold BrooksPlanner: Lauren Waterton
6. A request to amend the Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan and adopt the Gerald R. Ford
Park Management Plan.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Larry Gralel, Pam Brandmeyer, Todd Oppenheimer.
. Planner: George Ruther
7. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a Fractional Fee Club to be located al 242
East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pie]ce
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 24, 1997
8. A request for dn interior remodel to the secondary unit utilizing the 250 ordinance, located
at 778 Potato Patch Dr./Lot 18, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: Fred BartlitPlanner: Tammie Williamson
STAFF APPFOVED
9. A request for a residential addition for an expansion of the living room, utilizing the 250
Ordinance, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lol 19, Vail Valley 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Nate AccardoPlanner: Lauren Waterlon
WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA
10. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a Type ll EHU, located at 392 Beaver
Dam Circle/Lot 4, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Howard KoenigPlanner: Tammie Williamson
WTHDRAWN FROM AGENDA
ililililil111. Information Update:
12. ApprovalofJanuary2T,l99T minutes.
' The applications and inlormation about the proposals are available lor public inspection during
regular olfice hours in the project planner's otfice located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language inlerpretation available upon request wilh 24 hour notification. Please call 47$2114 voice or 479-2356
TDD for informalion.
Community Development Department
Published February 7, 1997 in the VailTrail.
t a
rl*- A*rt zie7,,r4ex 4 At" a;.
:
dG(a,*.&
fu.
k
-
I I I ;-r-r,bo lJ Of I' I --=-t'
-
|
, t ----.- /: ?o' -/ t ,/ z-?
@ /**7 o^/ 5* P.a.)
O
*a* .g--"^€
,/\/.#)\--
@ aA P'*A + (t^ #*,) -6 ."!J&Cery+
@-ea*.t ft,"(-*t\)/,</ 7 ap g:Zx4
+L ,^"/ 7{.,.gn,-.,' a- /L*. @., /*- /y'zVz s
f -.o
VJ-'=
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
February 10,1997
A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage' located at
t O3a'Homestake Circle/Lot 5' Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing'
Applicant: Art and Elaine Kelton
Planner: Dirk Mason
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUESTt.
The applicants, Art and Elaine Kelton, are requesting a lront setbacl ult]11." of approxim-ately .
5'-6", to allow for a 14'-6" front setback, in order to c-onstruct a garage addition of 206 sq' ft' This
site is currently improved with a two-story single family structure with a 452 sq' ft' two-car
garage.
This site originally had two dwelling unils, a single family structure with.a.detached two-car
girig" andiecoirdary OwLf fing ,nit abou". trE cuneni structure consists of only the original
iingt-e tamity dwelling unit and has since attached the garage into a single structure'
This site currently meets the Town of Vail Municipal Code's off-street parking requirements by
providing 3 parkiirg spaces. The current parking regu.lations do not require enclosed off-street
paixing ior iesiOeritiat uniti. t-towever, ericlosei paixing is encouraged by allowing a 600 sq. ft'
credit for enclosed parking on this site.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning:
Use:
Lot Size:
Slandard
GRFA:
Sile Coverage:
Landscape area:
Selbacks:
Front:
Sides:
Rear:
Parking:* Includes 425 sq. ft. credit
Primary/Secondary Residential
Single-Family residence
1 1,983 sq. ft,
Allowed
3,421 sq. ft.'
2,397 sq. ft. (20%)
7,190 sq. ft. (60%)
20'
15'
15'
3 spaces required
Exislino
2,888 sq. ft.
1,984 sq. tl. (16.5%)
9,226 sq. ft. (77"/")
24'.11- 14''6"
1a'-2" (north) & 20'-6" (south) n/c
14'-7" n/c
Prooosed
3,029 sq. ft.
2,352 sq. ft. (19.6%)
8,701 sq. ft. (73'/.)
4 spaces (2 enclosed)6 spaces (3 enclosed)
.-, a
III. CR]TERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of section 18.62.060, criteria and Findings, ol the Town of Vail Municipal code' the
CommunityDeve|opmentDepartmentrecommendsdenialoftherequestedfrontsetback
variance. The recommendation for denial is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
l.Therelationshipoftherequestedvariancetootherexistingor
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
Staff believes that providing enclosed parking for residential units is a
benefittotheneighborhood.Mosthomesconstructeo|ntn|S
neighborhoodhavetwo-cargarages.Eighthomeshaveaccesso|f
Homestafe Circle. Seven oitneJe homes have two-car garages and the
eighth has a one-car garage. Additionally, lhe adjacent properties to this
site meet ineiequired'tron1 setbacks. Staff believes that the requested
variance would dot be in harrnony with the structures in the vicinity'
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibilityanduniformityo|treatmentamongsitesinthevicinityor
to attain thsobiectives of this title without grant of special privilege'
staff believes that the layout and orientation of the existing structure do
not make this site uniqu6. The site exhibits no physical characteristics or
constrarnts which conititute a hardship, therefore, stafl believes the
proposal would be a grant of special privilege'
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traflic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and Public safety'
staff believes that this proposal has minimal impact on light and air'
however, it is not significairt enough to effect adjacent properties and the
right of way. This pioposal does not have any impact on the other factors
of consideration.
B.
before granting a variance:
o That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special . .
piiuii"gu inconsi-stent with the limitations on other properties classilied in
the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, sifety or wettare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
2.
3.
a -r aa
regulation would result in practical dilficulty or unnecessary
il"Gi""l il;tnip inconsiitent with the objectives ol this title'
b.Thereareexceptionsorextraordinarycircumstancesorconditions
afplicable to th'e same site ol the variance that do not apply
g'eherally to other properties in the same zone'
c. The strict interpretailon or enforcement ol the specified regulation'
would deprive tn" "plii.ini
of privileges enjoyed by the owners ol
other properties in the same district'
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The community Development Department staff recommends denial of the applicants'
tront setback viriance request subject to the following findings:
l.Thatthegrantingofthevariancewillconstituteagranto|special.privi|ege
inconiiit;nt witf fie limitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
2. That there are not exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
uppri"uor" to inis site that do not apply generally to other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District'
g. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation will
noi cepriue the apblicant of privileges enioyed by the owners of other
Properties in the same district'
I leveryone\p€c\memos\kelton.21 0
,.it^,'{",.S y,4t
",rr{ k.."^ 4
i.-,.\
c-p+. *.**J' F"-.--
o
NATIONAL FOREST
I-E RIVER
UNDARY
ffil fe{oPl
. \Al'-
TOWN OF VAIL
MAINT. SHOP
INTERSTATE 70( lloT tN T.o.v. )
VAILVILLAGE 8th
NATURE
CENTER
601
SOCCER FIELD
TRACT A
\IL VILLAGE 7th. FILING
975
3r
a4
990
o
GE
I
920
tn IIrl
I ltl
I r;
i\t
.II
f
$
I
5
\6
i
iri
!
T
1l
+l
$
il
$tT-l
]_I|
s
TI
(
5iltll\l
{
tii'- sF
tl{ ii iiFcir:\d
riI
tiI
oo
?**/
lA-l,611a,ta>,)
I
"t : la-rt td'l^J uantbztczt a* /N {
ur?ta^bAa io Ja;laa^q-> -ii Jn n
n"'U--n-|/
/"r*g-/Da/'. #/*J,* -Ar,/r "qr*-" -d'r-t
-lrh-aarrtt a//r'aA> {o -tu "--fM
-,;^-*
f ag**z d/e'/' gtn^^*|4*iu**
7 /?e7
;l
A^, "t-u*jfu7 ry"f^+ ry:/affa'zt
&' q/ffi1 a/ *J, ua*th-nu--t'
Ao*"" n2-
I-Lrn$iluw+ta.)/-/a/q /-r+ruah-/' ht)
NV O.IOO,/N[pV||IA3NOH 68LZ9LiBL6I 6ttzz L66T/ZT/rgta 39vd
a -':'-' t' ' t'"/)/
'ffitr72;*"5?)*qf*/-'*"-"i"-r')-"
%222"a..E ztt4o ;4.-zzz- '"'ffi7h2-Y-7/'*-z
.r//b:d Z,-o,e- *- -3#%-,u ,
a,-zz-tz- --*Z: '
*ffi 77t-*,,..,.2.,.'ffir;z
..2-zz{- *;:rizQiu':, 1t%i,'%ffifii.'ffiffi,p*"#r"tu"Ji,l/t4-a7-(ffiift24 z
ry4_
k%ffi-
'd,4^2 . tft--oa--zh-JtrSv-z-*-zf'"y&,z^u %
??*%22^ffiffi2
,.rrffiffi7,.lad6)
L{\\- tEB -? lss?
TCIVlC0|ihi,StY 'jl ' - ft62u4< I <f' rr q+
-fr.:Ni- Se1^ Bvr.- \ i^la p"J b -tu.l{ -THey +raa
,As l< r. ^\ 6' €oa- A './ +a, i4n\ c-6 . ! - AQ D,'i-,," "" \ h*-'l"
.oJSc gse.;^ -ata- pl*" t=N- &r.agkuc-h-e,^l..,,,....
lAAy tzo\ r
"r<
9 o J = F 44 4E !e-1!-. ERr= &!
(-\tor,og' { u
\, :-fJ"!F(q ->- --\ir,"rr !"<Q pt14!49 t>\) -blu'uus}o.lzo-
'-vd,e -e1i--D- --i-i$sa€ 6>4e -T\Jr'e 5*<r+e-€ -q2ct{e D
AUu_=_ Yt qts _A^r_ .Q!A_=_11p_y 4r{p*r <_4, g LVe_-+ ._-[-r+-,ee
.lnAda -be.r, L.sg*-*$e1,1- j=" lk:r"-+>*-b-rt
lJec,e99, f',, h*.1. hto.> Tb oa,r'l< .,s {1,.-^ St r€L+-o-- 11-
h7{Z- g,aa11-a"t! {e-rrS o'..\ 9,
-itn +-_ cr-c *lto -: \.n"i _pr',"u1 {. _pg pLCe
o
3
ftnQke'=S a,ro
tlligs (*n-rc-€ r,ol (;', |r1: - w |rae-
SV t ol,
2./5 zt'4A 4o.{4_e- L^riu_.- _;:_o( G€ _a.W_aauee-n tn ttL* -/znr,v.A*.-_ Nan- _qrgq_',_t4otL _fr.i__
tvt o>{ LqSe- - fu!-:.1--v t9f g:6-.- yvr Sr5_-o,r$-_.
.l rl I r,' 'L-t-ounat$J(e_ _L_l_ce] e _
-_-fd^$u o ,rl lhr>nnetL*l.n CrV 4 u-
Gva-,u
loq
ai
e--CVole-
o 616
(cL','- ++b''t{bfb
I
f*"m*y[pgr1,fttr,i
DONNA GIORDANO
1107 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
Mr. Dirk Mason
Town of Vail
Community Development Department
75 So. Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Mason:
The Keltons have shown me the plans for their proposed garage at 1034 Homestake
Circle, which I find both workable and in keeping with the feeling of the Golf Course.
As a neighbor,(we share backyards) I enthusiastically support their request for a
variance .
I do, however, strongly object to the alternative ofputting a garage in the backyard
behind their existing East garage, as it would require the cutting of trees, and be unsightly
for us as we enjoy the use ofthe decks on the bac$side ofour home all year.
g,L,
ORIGINAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environrnental Commission
Community Development Department
February 10,1997
A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage' located at
toC+'Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, VailVillage 7th Filing'
Applicant: Art and Elaine Kelton
Planner: Dirk Mason
The applicants, Art and Elaine Kelton, are requesting a lront setback variance olapproxim.ately .
5,-6,,, to allow lor a 14 -O''fiont setbaiX, in order to c"onstruct a garage addition of 206 sq' ft' This
in" il-"riren1y improved *itn
"
t*o-story single family structure with a 452 sq' ft' two-car
garage.
This site originally had two dwelling units, a single family structure with.a.detached two-car
girafilno"recoirdary o*eiiing unit ioou'e. rn6 curreni structure consists of only the original
irgllliriffOwelting unit and-has since attached the garage into a single structure'
This site currently meets the Town of Vail Municipal Code's oft-street parking requirements by.
providing 3 parking tp"".t. The current parking regulations do not req,uire enclosed Off-street
Faifi.g i"i
'ttiiOe'itiaf
units. However, enclosed paiXing is encouraged by allowing a 600 sq' ft'
credit for enclosed parking on this site.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
L
Zoning:
Use:
Lot Size:
Slandard
GRFA:
Site Coverage:
Landscape area:
Setbacks:
Front:
Sides:
Rear:
Parking:
' lncludes 425 sq. ft. credit
Primary/Secondary Residential
Single-Family residence
1 1,983 sq. ft.
Allolved
3,421 sq. ft.-
2,397 sq. 11. (2VAl
7,190 sq. ft. (600/.)
20'
t3
15',
3 spaces required
Existino
2,888 sq. ft.
1 ,984 sq. ft. (16.50l")
9,226 sq. ft. (77o/"1
24',-11- 14'-6"
14'-2" (north) & 20-6" (south) n/c
14'-7" n/c
Prooosed
3,029 sq. ft.
2,3s2 sq. ft. (19.60l.)
8,701 sq. ft. (730/"1
4 spaces (2 enclosed)6 spaces (3 enclosed)
III. CFITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review ol section 18.62.060, criteria and Findings, of the Town of v-ail Municipal code' the
Community Development Department recommends dinial of the requested front setback
variance.Therecommendationfordenia|isbasedonthefo||owing|actors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
Staffbe|ievesthatprovidingenc|osedparkingforresidentia|unitsisa
benelit to the neighborhood' Most hornes constructed In tnls
neignOornooO ha-ve two-car garages' Eight homes have access oft
Homestare circle. seven oitneJe homes have two-car garages and the
eignm nai-a-on"-."iS"i"S". Additionally, the adjacent properties to this
site meet iniieiulr"O"trfrt!.tbacks. S{aff believes that the requested
variance would riot be in harmony w1h the slructures in the vicinity'
2.Thedegreetowhichre|ief|romthestrictandlitera|interpretationand
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatability ano unitormity o1 rreatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain tne'oUlectives of tliis title without grant of special privilege'
Staffbelievesthatthe|ayoutandorientationoftheexistingstructuredo
not t"t .'mit iiiJunique. The site exhibits no physical-characteristics or
constraint;;nici, conititute a hardship, therefore, staff believes the
proposal would be a grant ol special privilege'
3'Theeffectoftherequestedvarianceon|ightandair,djstributionof
population, transportation and traffic facilities' public facilities and
utilities, and Public safety.
Staffbelievesthatthisproposa|hasrninima|impacton|ightandair'
however, it is not significant enough to effect adiacent properties and the
right of *"y.-fnis pioposal does iot have any impact on the other factors
of consideration.
before granting a variance:
l.Thatthegrantingo|thevariancewi||notconstituteagrantofspecia|
privilege inconsiltent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2.Thatthegrantingofthevariancewi||notbedetrimentaltothepub|ic
health, sitety oiwelfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinitY.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
B.
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement ol the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or. unnecessary
pn"vii"iihardship inconsiitent with the objectives of this title'
b.Thereareexceptionsorextraordinarycircumstancesorconditions
applicable to tn, ."t" site of the variance that do not apply
gbherally to other properties in the same zone'
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the sPecifi'e'lreO-ulation
rorfO-Oeptiue ihe applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners ol
other proirerties in the same district'
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The community Development Depaltment stafl recornmends denial of the applicants'
front setback variance request subject to the following findings:
1 . That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant ol special. privilege
in"oniiitEni*itf tne timitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
2.Thattherearenotexceptionsorextraordinarycircumstancesorconditions
"ppfi""nf!
O tnis site tnat OJnot appty generitly to other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District'
3. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specilied regulation will
noi O-epriue tne apiticant of iuivileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district'
I leveryone\p€cvn€mos!(ellon.21 0
TE RIVER NATIONAL
O
FO REST
NDARY
ffiD f'gloP I
. \AIL
?OWN OF VAJL
MAINT. SHOP
INT€RSTATE 70
a VAILVILLAGE 8th.f=--deb<
NATURE
C€NTER
60t 1
SOCCER FIELO
TRACT A
/AIL VILLAGE 7th. FILING
3
t(4
,990
1-t't ---:+
1-*l!
L.
rFIt r.rI I rll
^ II lri
\l ++i'"' ll
/f
r\,
$l
{T.
IT$I
$
I,
l(
1I
:l?lnt
J
\t
ui{" eF
iis i iig9iB:{s
fil
flt
iilr.l
rl
iI
iilq
$|I-?
utll
ill
ql
Etl
9tltr
ta
?*, Zr?qz
LLr;,bzr1a,^da,u
I
a.: h-r,f "dhJ @A/n4u, tub /Nt
hahta o Jt-.ta;qo -.* Jn A
n " ' (l- , n- 0 /
Jr{^la"/- oap e,uhc.la-6 -/^, .o'ta-d .J/t-
lrr^' 4 -4r* ana) wma*)'<- er/h/;P#aA-er-T%-'/m**,frMr I
-lr(r^-atrrtt a#'a,D {a -lrt ,*T q*MM^'bf"d4tt &/,haddl/
affh4aba,4.)J4 ":. Jt r.A"b arrl4lar rLry,"i
yn^"b $ a7r**r* /"D./-f, /" q/n^t -#u'alua*a-"cz'
fuau"uj@ ry"F+ryJ'r'fau-)U- q@ o/ iJ1L, uau-iz-rt^u-t'
Amu^ol,-
IJrnAnilwoa.)
/o// /T4n/AhJ", &;Jr)
T8 FVd W\tr{lg,rMpvMr.[H 6ALZ9LtgL6r 6r=ZZ LEEr/ZllTA
DONNA GIORDANO
1IO7 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
Mr. Dirk Mason
Town of Vail
Community Development Department
75 So. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
DearMr. Mason:
The Keltons have shown me the plans for their proposed garage at 1034 Homestake
Circle, which I find both workable and in keeping with the feeling of the Golf Course.
As a neighbor,(we share backyards) I enthusiastically support their request for a
variance .
I do, however, strongly object to the altemative of putting a garage in the backyard
behind their existing East garage, as it would require the cutting oftrees, and be unsightly
for us as we enjoy the use ofthe decks on the baclcside ofour home all year.
rt
Das=s-tglDiA-6 - *Llss TUgI t++JG
-ryLea--&c-a+ar:*--u.t--=tr--cp-*916r-c-A---4!---
I > ih oou -A',s r', 6 olp \q-Ej,atrD- \ g^ el!q-@ 4-e - -
|4II---!€T. Er<t4=-1in)q1- -Fd.'>-, -ast{--auef- *aq
-Asr<rJ6 FoQ- a ,./sa,r++$c-6 , 1", I!QD-,-h-',s \ hqr,r.=
[tu-se"!--ff - du:- =L* wE]ruch-e l-- -
W\+.\.rr.,,e9 - o-d-at< 44 4ryfqLm(C&ga)
f.--tu"ry-:
\ .-Stgg-r->- \iutl.a --grt,"+fo-e -t-r:> -b!ryaes!*E -- -q- :sL.-s €ttz-44E urorrqlr
Auuevt n'ha -4-g-t--q=tly 44-qDIQ, s Vee-t 5d€.4.€
ffiF^/€ $ro -t Lrleg--sr-hs^--{+-- l1=:rer!-ti +
rJee,r-g9t -e-P 'lrL^ svul*
k<- v *rz-#,.S "Ce€rg Dns 9.
T-r o'J A\ A vt o'LzS
ftl-tc-+r-rD- L +141+4-o-t+{L9 '\p-< tatatu
AfiqeA-pri *!q j_V""f _B{''u$- G- 91{,?:-ib _---_--
;NJ
ct^tt tlrec Vet+"..]c
rt
- - 3 . .-t+\€ <b,,r-O--el!gr\ -41)-qo-,ur,ftLter-
$Lt5-1fi4- -Lq--Wep euf{- "* qq #4a-
9Vtel,
-1+-4M-
I-MLD ) g+-
\ r l^
. 'Ib- ]AAC- e-!L-4-*-€ l.Je r*lQ u"c-Hooo
\\gL++ gP+ {i:rg!E _luls:--oL
fu"s-Lj<"-Ciq.k-
lh>.rt,re L*l.u Av
=F0-&u
loe .4--Akc,le
r/q.j 80
el e ssYze
!!
CeL',
4ADo _gwf _.- +'+b-qbfb
-/"- ;/"<'Z' -2"t-',o-++-zQ2''-zz --4^(-
A,, ,,..,4--; zl-z-.; -4" - 7/,r_.,oz-a-ar/Z--ffiffi4-"-effiz-C6/e-^."- 47':%rz4;ry,
a&z'/-tFz tk;^' -ffiz'.*-rluy',,,A*r,ffi*i*4&"/
oo
2V2fu"at4 +,qffiru;;tuffinWt*2ry.6=/-z;--
ap_zzc zz-2.-- "jz t __ALI-ffi;<z y=
-/-.ncz-
Dcfl,wfl,Stcm b,
T'r. I (i' '' .:.
tl),) l" i ilr'. i ';lll\,t iLt-i! ,tEB .- I isil ' .'J
I$V ' f,0i{ihi, Ui:i i;il t'
t
SAM B. COOK
238 MADISON STRE ET
Jrrrrnson Crry, Mrssounr
February 6, L997
Mr. Dirk Mason
Town of Vail
Community Developnent Department
75 S. Frontage Road West
Vail , colorado 8L657
Re: Requested variance for garage at LO34 Homestake Circle
Dear llr. l[ason:
As a neighbor adjacent to Honestake Circle, I strongly support the
Keltonrs request for a variance in order to build a third garage.
Parking on Homestake and Eagles Nest Circle is always very linited'particularly in the winter, and to be able to put another car
inside a garage would be helpful to us all.
The garage wilt be situated in an area where, I understand, there
never has been any snow stored.
(1012 East Eagles
Vail, Colorado
Nest Circle
81657 )sBc/pg
Thank you,
ot
o-- -.-- ---,4 <6' tr//
, -1'4-444 4/zAq?
ffi &"/
o
ul u2+s awDC_
(zt el'ttz)7ffi4 -'-zz e4- -zLz4.?*/ V*ry-T^7;- -,v//^- '-.r',"--tO- '-"2f 7C '
/-Va'}.r-z
4ffiffi-rv:
FEB-IS"-Lgg? LL|z?TER M{ITECTS
sAM B. COOK
A3A MAOI3ON STFE ET
Jerr;nsor Crry. Mrssounr
february 5, LggT
ur, Did( llason
Torn of VaiI
Connr.rnity Develop[ent D.epartnent
75 S. Frontage Road l{estvail, Colorado 8L657
Thank Yttu,
Re: Reguested variance for garagie at Lo34 t:onestake Circle
Dear llr. lilagon:
As a neigblror adjacent to Honestake Circle, I strongly suBpo*' tbe
Keltonts-requesd for a variance in order tc' bul.ld a third garage.
ParkinE on Honestake and Eagles Nest circle ie always veqr linlted,
particlrlarly in the winter, and to be atle to put another car
inside a garage would be helpful to us aLl,
The garage rrill be sLtuated in an area whet'e, I understand, tlrera
never has been anY snow stored.
P.@
$EB 1 r isql
f.l -..'-.i,: ;r , '
Lil;ilr"'''
11012 East Eaglr:s Nest Circle
VaiL, Colorado 81657)
t' lYr il. \'
s6c/pg
BCC: Elaine Kelton
TOTAL P.Az
MORTER ARCHITECTS NEICHBORING LOTS KELTON RESIDENCE
Lot 3
Florence A. & Thonras L Steinberg
P. O. Box 13
Vail, CO 81658
Lot 4
Gerald L. & Deanna E. Stempler
10733 Tucker Street
Beltsville, MD 20705
Lot 6
John F. & Diana M. Donovan
l0l4 Homestake Circle
Vail, CO 81657
I,otT
Gilbert R. & Donna Giordano
Woodside Box 53
Iothian, MD 2071I
rHrs rrEM "i"rtifffilYouR
PRoPERTY
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental commission of the Town of
Vaif *itt hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail od January 13, 1997, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building' In
consideration of:
A request lor a worksession to review the proposed changes to the Development Review
lmprovement Process (DR lP).
Public Works Dept., Fire Dept. and Community Development Dept.
Susan Connelly
A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new.garage, located at
1034'Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Art and Elaine Kelton
Dirk Mason
A request for an amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Land Use Plan'
located south of the Lodge Tower/T.SS., R.80W., Sec' 8, Lot 2.
Applicant; Lodge Properties, Inc.Planner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a variance lrom Section 18.58.320, Satellite Dish Antennas, D1, 3,4, 6, to allow
two datellite dishes to be installed at the northwest corner ol the Vail Commons property, located
at 2099 N. Frontage Road WesV Vail Commons.
Applicant: KTUN RadioPlanner: Tammie Williamson
A request to amend the Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan and adopt the Gerald R. Ford Park
Management Plan.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Larry Grafel, Pam Brandmeyer, Todd Oppenheimer.
Planner: George Ruther
A request for a side setback variance in order to construct a two car garage, located at
4532 Streamside Circle East/Lot 15, Bighorn 4th Addition.
Applicant: Lillian and William Bresnahan, represented by Kathy Langenwalter
Planner: Lauren Waterton
A request for a minor subdivision to relocate the common property_ line between Lots 7 and 8,
locatbo at 666 and 696 Forest Road/Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Vail Village 6th Filing.
Applicant: Neil and Nancy AustrianPlanner: Lauren Waterton
,(
. ,|.'l'ij"'it rt-
lt7t1,,1i|-v 1..tL t. t (Lv" t?'l ' ,'.u.,/ t r"
A request lor a new Special Development Districl, No.33, located at 1521 and 1631 Buflehr Creek
Road/Lots 3 & 4, The ValleY, Phase V.
Applicant: Jim and Ronna FlaumPianner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a worksession to discuss establishing a Spec'lal Development District overlay to lhe
Austiia Haus, located at242EastMeadow Drive/ on part of Tract C, Vail Village First Filing'
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, lnc., represented by Gordon Pierce
Planner: George Ruther
A request to amend section 16.20.020 and to add section 16.04.065 of the Sign Code to allow for
electionic signs as Public Intormation Signs.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Dirk Mason
APPLICATION W]THDRAWN
A request for a conditional use permit utilizing_![r9 250 Ordinance, to allow for a Type ll EHU'
locatbd at 186 Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Mike FlannetYPlanner: Dirk Mason
APPLIGATIoN WITHDBAWN ,r*rttl
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection.during
reguldroffice hours in the project planner's office located at the Town ol Vail Community
Development Departrnent, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretataon available upon requesl wilh 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD
for information.
Communily Development Department
Published becembbr December 27, 1996 in the Vail Trail.
G. fut &ElaineKehon (propertyowner)
1034 Homestake Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
Donna& Gil Giordano (adjacen|
ll0TVailValleyDrive & 1081 VailValleyDrive
Vail, C.olorado 81657
G€raH & Deanna Stempler
1044 Honestake Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
Tom&Flo Steinberg
Box 13
Vail, Colorado 81658
Joht & DianaDononan
1014 Homestake Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
1022 Eagles Nest Circle
A Prolessional Corporation
143 East Meadow Drive
Crossroads at Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
970/476-5105
FAX 970/476-0710
MonrnnAncnrECTs
SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST
TO ALLOW FOR A GARAGE
Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village
Seventh Filing
Town of Vail
ln keeping with the Town of Vail's long-standing policy of encouraging
garages Jt residences; and in keeping with the town's established
[recEAent of granting front set back variances to allow for garages at
residences, the applicant requests a minor front setback variance to
construct a garage at their home at Lot 5, Block 6, vail Village seventh
Filing.
Because the applicant's lot is quite small (11,987 square feet) which is
less than the 1'5,000 square feet required in its Primary/secondary zone
district to allow two dwelling units; and because of existing conditions on
the site, the minor front setback variance is required'
As proposed, the new garage will have only positive effects on other
existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The new garage
will enlbte all required parking (three spaces) to be enclosed, and have
no negative effects on light, air, distribution of population, transportation,
trafficiacilities, utilities, ind public safety. Enclosing all required parking
is appropriate and desirable in a neighborhood of such small lots.
The applicant requests no granting of special privilege' The proposed
garage'is sized only for the parking of a car, with no additional space for
storage, or other uses.
oa)t
APPR0$$DJANzl
€91
2. A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, localed at
1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Art and Elaine KeltonPlanner: Dirk Mason
Dirk Mason stated that the applicant requested that this item be tabled until February 10, 1997.
Planning and Envirornruotal Commission
Minutes
January 13, 1997
a o
AfY
Greg Amsden made a motion to table this item until February 10' 1997.
John Schofield seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
Planning and Environme al Cornmission
Minuies
Januarv 13. 1997
t+a o
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Departmenl
DATE: January 13,1997
SUBJECT: A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, located at
1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Art and Elaine KeltonPlanner: Dirk Mason
I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicants, Art and Elaine Kelton, are requesling a front setback variance of approximately
5'-6", to allow lor a 14 -6" front setback, in order to construct a garage addition of 206 sq. ft. This
site is currently improved with a two-story single family structure with a 452 sq. ft. two-car
garage.
This site originally had two dwelling units, a single family struclure with a detached two-car
garage and secondary dwelling unit above. The current structure consists of only the original
single family dwelling unit and has since attached the garage into a single structure.
This site currenlly meets the Town of Vail Municipal Code's oftstreel parking requirements by
providing 3 parking spaces. The current parking regulations do not require enclosed off-street
parking tor residential units. However, enclosed parking is encouraged by allowing a 600 sq. ft.
credit for enclosed parking on this site.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residenfial
Use: Single-Family residence
Lot Size: 1 1 ,983 sq. ft.
Standard Allowed Existino Prooosed
GRFA: 3,421 sq. ft.' 2,888 sq. ft. 3,029 sq. tr.
Site Coveraie: 2,397 sq. ft. (2trl.) 1 ,984 sq. ft. (16.s%) 2,352 sq. ft. (1 9.6"/")
Landscape area: 7,190 sq. ft. (60%) 9,226 sq. n. F7o/") g,7ot sq. ft. (7gol.)
Setbacks:
Front: 20, 24'.11,' 14'-6'Sijes: 15' 14'-2" (norrh) & 20,-6', (south) ntcRear: 15' 14'-7" nlc
Parking: 3 spaces required 4 spacss (2 enclosed) 6 spaces (S enclosed)' Includes 425 sq. ft. credil
o
III. CR]TERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.62.060, Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code' the
Cbmmunity Development Department recommends denial of the requested front setback
variance. The recommendation for denial is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
Stafl believes that providing enclosed parking for residential units is a
benefit to the neighborhood' Most homes constructed in this
neighborhood have two-car garages. Eight homes have access off
Hoirestake Circle. Seven of these homes have two-car garages and the
eighth has a one-car garage. Additionally, the adjacent properties to th.is
site meet the required front setbacks. Stafl believes that the rerlltgslg6
. variance would not be in harmony with the struclures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief lrom the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation ls necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
Staff believes that the layout and orientation of the existing structure do
not make this site unique. The site exhibits no physical characteristics or
constrainls which constitute a hardship, therefore, staff believes the
proposal would be a grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, pubtic facilifies and
utilities, and Public safety.
Statl believes that lhis proposal has minimal impact on light and air'
however, it is not significant enough to effect adjacent properties and the
right of way. This proposal does not have any impact on the other factors
of consideration.
before granting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially iniurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinitY.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
B.
tv.
physica|hardshipinconsistentwiththeobjectivesofthistit|e.
b.Thereareexceptionsorextraordinarycircumstancesorconditions
"ppii.aure
ioin'e same site ot the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone'
c.Thestrictinterpretationoren|orcementofthespeci|iedregu|ation.
*oiri'06'pii". ine ippricant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other proirerties in the same district'
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department staff recommends denial of the applicants'
front setback viriance request subject to the following findings:
1 . That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special. privilege
inconiist5nt wittithe timitations on other properties classified in the same
distlict.
2. That there are not exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
"ppfi.iOfe
io tnis site that do not apply generilly to other properties in the
irimary/Secondary Ftesidential Zone District'
3. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation will
noi deprive the apblicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
Properties in the same district.
l:\evaryons\pecvnemos\k€lton.1 1 3
TE RIVER
o
NATIONAL FOREST
o
NDARY
UNA-ATTED ffil l-snoP I
. vllL
TOWN OF VAIL
MA'NT. SHOP
INTERSTATE 7O H
o
lENNIS VAILVILLAGE 8th
TRACT F
t*9
VAIL WATER
A
Y 620
soccER
TRACT
FIELD
/AIL VILLAGE 7Th. FILING
[lr----r-Ceil
NATURE
CENTER
501
-sl
-l
:il
xl
,il
f"Tll!
J't--.
rii ,. ig
it{ li iiI$iB5{d
f,3
A Prolesslonal CorDorallon
143 East Moadow Driv€
Crossroads et Vell
Vail, Colorado 81657
970/476.510s
FAX 970/476.0710
MonrenAncnrECTs
January 13, 1997
Dir* Mason
Community Development
Town of Vail, Colorado
DearDi*:
We formally request that the Kelton project be tabled until the Planning and Environmental
Commission me*ing on February 10, 1997. Andr€w Abraham will be available for today's site
visit to review tbe locatioos of the proposed additions. Thank yor for this last minute change of
plans and we look forqrard to presentiag the lGlton project in February.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
January 13,1997
T\LE $SP\t
SUBJECT: A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, located at
1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Art and Elaine KeltonPlanner: Dirk Mason
I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicants, Art and Elaine Kelton, are requesting a front setback variance of approximately
5'-6", to allow for a 14'-6" front setback, in order to construct a garage addition of 206 sq. ft. This
site is currently improved with a two-story single family structure with a 452 sq. ft. two-car
garage.
This site originally had two dwelling units, a single family structure with a detached two-car
garage and secondary dwelling unit above. The current structure consists of only the original
single family dwelling unit and has since attached the garage into a single structure.
This site currently meets the Town of Vail Municipal Code's oftstreet parking requirements by
providing 3 parking spaces. The current parking regulations do not require enclosed off-street
parking for residential units. However, enclosed parking is encouraged by allowing a 600 sq. ft.
credit for enclosed parking on this site.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Use: Single-Family residence
Lot Size: 11,983 sq. ft.
Standard Allowed Existino Prooosed
GRFA: 3,421 sq. ft." 2,888 sq. ft. 3,029 sq. ft.
Site Coveraie: 2,397 sq. ft. (20ol.) I ,984 sq. ft. (16.50l") 2,gS2 sq. ft. (19.60/.)
Landscape area: 7,190 sq. tt. (607.) 9,226 sq. ft. (77v"1 8,701 sq. tr. lTgo/.\
Setbacks:
Front: 20' 24,-11" 14'€"Sides: 1 5' 14 -2" (north) & 20,S. (south) n/cRear: 15' 14'-7" n/c
Parklng: 3 spacss required 4 spaces (2 enclosed) 6 spaces (g enclosed). Includes 425 sq. tt. credit
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section '18.62.060, Griteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code' the
Gommunity Development Department recommends dJnial of the requested front setback
variance. The recommendation for denial is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
l.There|ationshipo'therequestedvariancetootherexistingor
potential uses and structures in the vicinity'
Staf|be|ievesthatprovidingenc|osedparkingforresidentiS!unitsisa
benefittotheneighborhood'Mosthomesconstructed|ntn|s
neighborhoodhavetwo+argarages.Eighthomeshaveaccessoff
Homestafe Circle. Seven oitneie homes have two-car garages and the
eighth hasl one-car garage. Additionally, the.adiacent properties to this
site meetini required'fron-t sebacks. Staff believes that the requested
. variance would riot be in harmony with the structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which retief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and unitormity o1 treatment among sites an the vicinity or
to attain thaobjectives ot ttris titte without grant ot special privilege.
Staff believes that the layout and orientation of the existing structure do
not make this site uniqu6. The site exhibits no physical characteristics or
constraints which constitute a hardship, therefore, staff believes the
proposalwould be a grant of special privilege'
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and Public safety-
staff believes that this proposal has minimal impact on light and air'
however, it is not significant enough to effect adjacent properties and the
right of way. This pioposal does not have any impact on the other factors
of consideration.
before grantino a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privitege inconsi-stent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or wetlare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
B.
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specilied
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the obiectives ol this title'
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
afpfiianfe to th'e same site of the variance that do not apply
g'eherally to other properties in the same zone'
c.Thestrictinterpretationorenforcementolthespecifiedregulation.
woufO Oeptiue ine appicint of privileges enioyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district'
IV. STAFF RECOTIIMENDATION
The community Development Department staff recommends denial of the applicants'
front setback variance request subject to the following findings:
1 . That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege
inconiiit6nt witlithe limitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
2. That there are not exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
"dtd;b[ rc iniJ sire tn'at do not apply generally to other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District'
g. That the strict interpretation or enforcement ol the specified regulation will
nof olprve ttre apiticant of priviteges enjoyed by the owners of other
Properties in the same district.
f:\averyon€\pecvnsmo6\ketton.1 1 3
JrrE RrvER NATToNnSonEST o
]o NDARY
UNPLATTED ffi} lsroP l
. \AIL
TOWN OF \AIL
MAINT. SHOP
TNIFRSTATE 70 H
VAILVILLAGE 8th
C*r*
VAIL WATER
NATURE
CENTER
601
Y 620
s0ccER
TRACT
FIELO
VAIL VILLAGE 7Ih. FILING
!
$l
-t
<l
,ll
di
fFll-!
\
FIr|.fii
l3
{[l{\t
l{
R
i +---------..'
}.ltl
lt{s
i$s
=5d
rl
til
!ll
$f
!ll'-llaf.LI
iil3
utl
_\lI-Tll
ll ltl
\\ II
--tl
ql
$iltr
o
A. TYPEOFAPPLICATION:
tr Additional GRFA (250)
tr Bed and Brealdast
tr Conditional Use Permit
tr Major or E Minor Subdivision
tr Rezoning
tr Sierr Variancer,\ Vaiance
tr Zoning Code Amendment
APPLICATION FOR PI,AIINING AND ENVIROI{MENTAL
COMMISSION APPROVAL
tr AmendmeNrt to an Approved Dwolopment Plan
tr Employee Housing Unit CIY?c:
--Jtr Major or tr Minor CCI Exterior Alteratiott
(Vail Village)
tr Major or tr Minor CCII Ext€rior Alt€ration
(Lionshead)
tr Special Dwelopment District
tr Majoror E MinorAmendrnenttoan SDD
G.
H.
I0rN 0Fvm,
Ou{f Ca[ the Planning Staff at 479-2138
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any pr-ject requiring approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission. For specific
infomution. see the zubmitaliequiroments for the particular approval that is requasted- The application can not be
accepted until all required inforrlation is submited- The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council
and/or the Desigrr Rwiow Bord.
{s.DESCRIPTION OF TTIE REQUEST:
LAa.a\E F.> cF crF.tr6-<t_ e.e-.+.P r.-'\-i*\-> Ft4sr trEf!ba<i.-.
c.LOCATION OFPROPOSAT: IOT_L_ELOCKJ2 .FILING 7:!L
ADDRESS: ta?rt llca,Es-rayrE- <a€A_€- BUILDINGNAME:
D. ZONhIG: FErn^E-Y'/=€z e- --#7' (u|€-E- \€a@ *tB\
E.NAME OF OWNER(S):e\-5rFsE--.r-AlF< llI\-:RS
MAILINGADDRESS:<AF'A=.
q-la.\'?4'. trt\t
-l r.OWNER(S)SIGNA
NAME OF REPRESENTATM: F^G*-=_,aFzr.\=G<F
MAILINGADDRESS: \\3'E|L'='T \aEAtalE> EF\'E- \A\-co A\aS]
PHONE:n-?o'\'14'$lD€
FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRTATE FEE.
suBr\drT THIS APPLICATTON, ALL SIJBMTTTAL R.EQUREMENTS AND TltE FEE TO TIIE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMIJNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD'
VAIL, COLORADO E1657.
For Office Use Only:
FeePaid: 2g). 60 cw:1CbL
"r.
Application Date ,12'lb- qb PEC Meeting Date:t -tb-1?
Revi.d 5D6
{
,
o
SUBMITTAL REQIJIREMENTS FOR A VARHNCE
I. PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE
A pr.-rypfi"atl*.onfer*.r *ith a planning staffmember is stnongly encouraged. No application
can be accepted unless it is completc. It is the applicant's responsibility to makc an appointm€nt
with the staffto deterrnine additional submittal requirements.
II. SI.]BMITIALREOUIREMENTS
FEE: $250.00. The fee must be paid at the time of submittal.
Stamped, adrtressed envelopes Agd a list of the names and mailing addresses of all property ovmers
adjacent to the subject property, including poperties behind and across sfieeb. The ryplicant is
rcsponsible for correct names and mailing addrcsses. This information is available from the Eagle
Countv Assessor's offi ce.
O A written statement ofthe precise nature ofthe variance requested and the specific regulation
involved.
O A written stdernent addrcssing the following:
. The relationship ofthe requested variance to other existing or potrntial usqs and struoir€s
in the vicinitv.
. The degree to which relief ftom the slrict or litcrdl interpretation and enforcoment ofa
specified regulation is necessary to achiwe compatibility and uniformify of teaffnent among
sites in the vicinity or to afiain the objectives ofthis titlc without grant ofspecial privilege.
. The effect of tbe variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, baffic
facilities, utiliti€s, and public safety.
. How yourr€quest complies with Vail's Comprehensive Plan.
ft rz ss A preliminary title report, including schedules A and B, to veriff ownership and easements.
" H*J*-aoliF,}-ffi approvar (ir appricabre).
tr Any additional material necessay for the rwiew of the application as detennined by the
Adminisfrator.
Four (4) copies of the following:
A topogr4hic and/or improvement sunrey at a scale of at least l" = 20' stamped by a
Colorado licensed suneyor including locations of all existing improvemants, including
grades and elwations. Other elements which must be shown are paking and loading areas,
ingress and egress, landscaped areas and utility and drainage features.
A site plan at a scale ofat least 1" = 20'showing existing and proposed buildings.
o
tr
Page I of2
o
o
Building elevations and floor plans sufrcient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance'
scale and use ofall buildings and spaces existing urd proposed on the site.
For interior modifications. an improvemort sun ey and site plan may be waived by the Administntc
PLEASENOTE THAT ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS CANBEACCEPTED. ALL OF
THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ORDER FOR THIS
APPLICATION TO BEDEEMED COMPLETE.
TIMEREOUIREMENTS
A The Pluming and Environmqrtal Commission meets on thc 2nd and 4th Mondays of each
month. A complete appticdion fomr and all acconrpanying material (as described above)
must be accesed by the Community Dwelopment D€prunent by the appropride submittal
date, which is a minimum of four (4) weeks prior to the datc of the PEC public hearing.
Incomplete applications (as determined by the planning staff) will not be accepted.
B. All PEC approved vriances shall lapse if construction is not commenced within one year of
the date of ryproval and diligently prrsued to conpletion, q if the use for which the
ap'proval is granted is not commcnced within onc yea.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW Al.fD FEES
A. lfthis application requires a separate review by any local, SAte or Fede'ral agsncy other than
the Town of Vail, the applicdion fee shall be incrEased by S200.00. Examples of such
rwiew, may include, but re not limited to: Colmado Deprtnant of Highway Access
Permits, Army Corps of Engineen 404, etc'
B. The applicmt shall bc responsible for paying any prblishing fees which are in excess of
50% of the ryplication fee. If, at the ryplicanfs request, any maficr is pos$oned for
heaing cagsing the matter to be re-publishe( then, the entire fee fon such re-publication
shall be paid by the applicant
C. Applications deemed by the Community Developmeat Departrnent to have design, land use
or other issues which may bave a sigrificant impact on the coimmunity may r€quire revicw
by consultants in addition to Town stafr. Should a dccrnrination be made by the Town staff
firat an outside consulhnt is neede4 the Community Developm€nt De,portm€Nrt may hirc the
consultant. The Departme'lrt shall estimate the amount of mon€y n€essary to pay the
consultant 8nd this arnount shall be forwarded o the Town by the applicant at the time of-
filing an ryplication. Expenses incr.ured by the Town in excess of the amormt fuwarded by
the appticant shatl be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days ofnotification by the
Town. Any excess funds will be retumed to the applicant upon rwiew completion.
III.
rv.
V.
Prge2 oI2
4\'1\
ro
o T
it
rl
$
tr
f
\
$l
\$
i$
u
FI
Nl
s.z
\rl
J
il
ill!l
1l
fl
,r/Ft\
).P i =tr
$t+ ir $t-
t$5 g ii$9;B:sd
\
o
$
nl
t\J\t
{lI-.1llilktilltl
.l
$rltl-\n
-::=rl
o
hg
*P
$$
+1
o
o
1," c"Y
trJGF
J
5:t tL
F.()
EF
,--
e!'"-e
CIl
rd(9
JJ
J
S.
,-
o 5
ilJ
)tE
Lril
6'
FI
JI43U13
t%^s
3n-
F-
-6
oJ(D
zq
F
F
E
tlJF
3
J
F
CN
rO
o)q-=
o
r)g
8t
iq
@
Nl_
\=
,is
og
Bl
c
;
o
14
OrO
rQ
))t
/.
\QJ
o
F()
EF
ctrf ol
O)
@'$
\y
IH U,il',
967 9
liTRACT
co
A
6
)5
x,+t3/
f o55
4@x.,s\+*
3'
IO45
AooT:r
,4r 5
@ < t s,.oo Q
€
30
',trrrt@#
@ 4:g-;
il06
9
g?
o
7
loSf
!r
I
,,?(
g,l (::-'/4
TRACT D
I
I
98 I
rotT 6
ttf9
4@
992
3o
?c
996
975
Ll,lilffi"*l#"f-ffiY;;;
il Tsrs Dnrn, !fiedethtc 27th dryof ,January .
..il re z o , betreo \IArr. AssocrATEs , rNc. ,'
'il
'il a cornorauon duly orggnized and airting under and by vir'lne ol the lrrr
11
of tne Stato of CoLorado of the tirrt parL snd
ri ARTIITR M. KELTON, ,JR.
Rccordcr'r Strnp
riln D0iltf,iln m
+ou-rns,-
to the said party of tbe lirst part in hsnd paid by the lrid Darty of the second part, t}e receipt whereol lr hersby
confessed and aclnrowledg€d, h6th gxanted, bargained. rold and corveyed, end by these ptgents doth 8lant' bargain'
rell, convey and confirm unto the raid part y of the recond part, his heirs, end asriglr forcvcr,
all of the following described lot
County of Ea g le
or parcel of laod, rituata, lyi:ng aoil beingl in tha
snd Stst€ of Colorado. to wit:
TOGETTTFR with all end rinsular the hereditaments end appurtenances thereunto belolSing,6i i! anywice
aDDertainins. and tlre reversion oi teverrions, remainders, rentsl -issues and profits tlereof; -aad all the estate'
rijtrt, tlUe,Iirterest, claim and demand whatsoever of the caid pqrty of t'he first part, either in law or equity' ol' iB
and to the sbcve ba;gained prer:alses slth the b€reditsments 8xd rppurteneDees.
IJot 5, Block 6, vail vi11a9e, Seventh Filing
TO EAIIE AND TO SOLD tho raid premiset above bargained and described, with the appurtenances unto tbe
heirs and asrigrr forever. Antl the sald
party of the firgt part, for itrell,
and its successors, doth covenant. grant, bargain, and agree to 8nd with tho said part|of the eecond par{
his heirs and aglgns, that at ths tfune of the enrealing and delivery of thsss pr€rsnts it,io wsll
rises ebove ootriev'ed. as of a sood. rure. oer{ect. absolut€ and indcfeasible estate ol inheritance. laseized of the premises above conveyed, as of a good, !ure, per{ect,
law, in fee siuple, and hgt}r eiood right full power and lawful aut
eetate of inheritance.
law, in fee siilple, and hgt}r eiood right fult polier and lavrful authority to gteot, bargain, sell and convey the eamc
in manner and fo'rrtr aforegald. ond that the same are free 8nd clear from all fotmer and other grants, bsrgainr,in manner and fo'rrtr aforegald, ond that the same are free 8nd clear from all fotmer and_ other grants, bsrgainr,
sales, liens, tareE, alsessments and incumbrances of whatever kind or nature aoever; gu! jgct to gen-
eral taxes and special assessments for 1970, payable in 1971 and
al-l subsequent taxes, and subject to lhe easements and protective
covenants of record.
the first part hath caused its corporate name to be hereuuto
cor?orate reol to be hereunto affixed, ottested by its
said part y of the secoud part, his
Vail Associates, Inc.
A ss istan
before "-dme this d./
al
DEc 23 870
of tle county ot Eagle and state of
of the second part:
WITNESSErII, Thet the gaid party of the first part, for and in conglderation of the cum of
Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration
o"" or,funu
No. 408. WARnANT! ItEElH.trcntior. -Br..dtord Publithtns Co- ltzl-tc Stost gt!..q D!ot.r, Colol.do
"$
:l.t
cncoo
9'r!>
:*;
ps
zo
3tr('
.o!qa
/,
to
of
I
;Lq
g,
tita
gil
:
3li
)tt'
6-rtIooo
a-
t
3
o
=r8
if,
F
Ia
cdT1n')It;-|fi
v
ere,P;bii,i:A tr,- e Ll0i
L,\
-!-r-rr--,!t-! r-!F r---lF! I l-
l'!i sr+1. I .3neau=: f,3:t-:
i :'-' i .r '':!''1ai,'
l'-,. ,.l r' r +! :'i-:':lii:
,:!, . -,i ,,-' 'i ,lt i- f. rE -)t: 'i-'
ilt;:l-i.il ll; i l:l ii-r! i, Iii I l! lF 1 r-Jill :i:
it,r,, , 'rt i r ,''. -i- '-'lrJ
-rd'ir1 - i:il:i
r, r-zt,j. Fzai ffg'g111 P=id
-.!t:,,:4 i!r:':
-!-HFt-{t4 t-'rfil-l
r.r-,,i. -:!-1,: ' r'-i"l!':l
r':1 i,.:rt!:il!:li!'!i 1
-:rat1i1!1lr:l
_l':rr,, i,:, r'rr tr rrr'':'-l
Anerican I
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY
STEWART TITLEGUARANTY COMPANY
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for
valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in
Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate
or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the
premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions
and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of
Ote policy or policies committed for have been inscrted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either
at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all
liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof
or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the
failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
Signed under seal for the Company, but tliis Commitment shall not be valid or binding until it bears an
authorized Countersignature.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to
be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on thc date shown in Schedule A.
STEWAITT TITLE
GUAMNTY COMPANY
Chailman of the
P.O. Box 2000
Vail, Colorado 81658
(970) 949- 101 l
Count.ers ignaLure
ART TITLE OF EAGLE COUNTY, INC.
1.
/,.
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or
other security instrument.
If the proposed Insured has or acquires acrual knowledge of any defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other lnatter affecting the estate or interest or
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in
Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in
writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage
resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced
by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insurcd shall disclose
such knowledge to the Cornpany, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual
knorvledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,
the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment
accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company frorn liability
pleviously incun'ed pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
Liability of the Company under this Commitnent shall be only to the naned
proposed Insurcd and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the
form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in
reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements
hercof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or
create the estate or interest or rnortgagc thereon covered by tliis Cornmitment. In
no event shall such liability cxceed the amount stated in Schedulc A for the policy
or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring plovisions, the
Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of
policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured rvhich ale hereby
incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitrnent except as
expressly modified herein.
Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may
bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or
interest or the status of the mongage thereon covered by tlis Comrnitment must be
based on arrd are subiect to the Drovisions of this Commitment.
STBWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
All notices requiled to be given the Company and any statement in rvliting lequired to
be furnished the Company shall be addlessed to it at P.O. Box 2029,I-{ouston, Texas
77252, ard identify this courmitmcnt by its plintcd COMMITMENT OIIDER NUM-
BER which appears oll the bottom of the front of the first page of this coniniitment.
3.
A
Order Number: 96072580
o SCHEDULEA o
LEGAL DESCNPTION
BTock 6,
VAIIJ VIIJIJAGE SEyt;IlJiIH FIL'ING
COUNTY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLORADO
r'd SCHEDULE B
Seoion I
Order Number: 96022580
REQUIREMENTS
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account ofthe grantors or mortgagors of thefutl consideration for the estate or
interest to be insured.
Iten(b) Properinstrument(s) teatingthe estdteorintercst tobeiruuredmust beexecutedand du$filedfor
record, to wit:
Z, .IIONE
.: .):
Order Number: 96or2sgo
SCHEDULE B
Section 2
EXCEPTIONS
The policy or policies to be issued will contain erceptions to the follovting unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of rhe Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easen;ents, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for sertices, labor or mcterial heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
-t. Defects, Iiens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appeaing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this cornmitment.
6. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance thereof;
water rights, claims or title to water.
7. lny and aJJ anpaid Eaxes aad assessments and any unredeemed Eax sa.Ies.
8. The effect of inelusions ia any general ot specific vra|er conserwaney, fire
proeection, soiT conserwaEion or othet district or inelusion ia aay water
serwice or stteee improrre.men t area .
9. Reservatjons or excepeions eontained in t..9. paCerres, or in AcEs authorizing
Ee issuance theteof, recorded May 27t I926 in Book 93 ae Pagre L46, resetwlng
7) Righes of the proprietor of a vein ot Tode eo extract and remove hjs ore
Eherefrom and 2) righEs of way for dlEches aad canals constructed urder Che
auehoiiCy of the Vnited Stsaees.
70. EasemenCs, resErictions and rights-of-ways as shov'l on Cie .t,l.aC of VaiT ViTTage
SevenEi FiTing, reeorded December 77, 7965 as Receptjon No. 702780.
77. Tetms, condiCioaa, reserraEions, resbriceions aad obTigaEions as contajned in
Covenanes for VaiT ViTTage Serenth tiTing recorded December 77, 7965 in Book
787 ae Page 575 a.s Receptior: No. 702778.
72. A Deed of Trust, dated .ranuar.l 23, 7996, executed by Art]rur M. Kelton jr.,, co
Ehe PubLie lruscee of EagLe Couney, to secure an indebtedness of S45O,OOO.OO,
in favor of FirstBank of VaiT recorded Tebruary 7, 7996 in Book 687 at Page 522
as Reception No. 583524.
Orier Number: g6ot2sso
SCHEDALE A
L Effectivedarc: December 72, !996 at 8:00 A.t4.
2. Poliq or Policies to be issued:
(a) A.L.T.A. Owner's (Exteaded)
Proposed Insured:
- 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is desuibed as follows:
SEE ATTACEED LEGAI, DESCRIPTXON
Purported Address:
Amount of Insurance
,t
STATEMENT OF CIURGES
These chargu are due and payable before a
Polic'y can be issued.
@) A.L.T.A. Loan (Exteaded)
Proposed Insured:
(c) Leasehold
Proposed Insured:
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is
fee simpTe
4. Title to the f ee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective dae hereof vested in:
ARlIEUR M. KEI'TON' 'JR.
t'
tnn Review Action FClt
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
Project Name:
Building Name:
ll I / t, ,'-t
Project Descriplion: Ktr.-n-", 1 a/ '/ // ar,t, "r r-=
Owner. Address and Phone:
ArchitecVContact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot etocx ( sudaiviston L/'o, I I /1,r, r ,7li't Zone District 4r:
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motion by:Vote:
Seconded by:
! Approval
yK^pp.r^t
! StafiApproval
t,. /VFft't€
(i/,
DRB Fee Pre-paid
a
F|LE Coii
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-28q479-2139
FAX 970-/f79-2452
November 6, 1995
Department of Community Development
Mr- Arthur Kelton, Jr.
1 0tl4 Homestake Circle.
Var, CO 81657
Ref DRB Application for Tree Removal
Dear Mr. Kelton,
While Town staff were trying to secure equipment to remove the tree on your property that you
sr.drmitted a DRB application to remove, we were informed by a resident that you had already
removed the 40 foot spurce. This complaint was confirmed with a site visit to your property on
Friday November 3, 1995. The VailTown Code in Section 18.54.030 states that no person shall
commence removal of vegelation... without Design Review Board approval. This regulation
exists to protect tree resources on both private and public property which are considered
important in maintaining the alpine character of the community. The removal of the tree on your
pr@erty without DRB approvalis a violation of the Town Code and subject to citation. Please
consider this letter a warning and further removal of trees on your property without DRB
approvat will be subject to citation. lf you have any questions regarding the Town's regulation in
regards to this issue, please feel free to conlact me at 479-2146.
Sirrcerely,
Susan Connelly
Tom Moorhead, Esq.
Code Enforcement
Legal Files
x.c.
Senior Environmental Policy Planner
{g *"nt *ruo
t/tqq- U,*L'LUL- -t.vt..A 8ll7lga
DESTGN REVIEI{ BOARD
\d10'[qnll{l|{m't
AP
I.
A.
c.
D.
B.
- TOIW Or , COITORADO
TNCOMPI'EITE APPIJICATIONS I'IAY NOT BE SCHEDWED FOR REVIEW.**********
TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction ($200.00) Minor AlLeraLion ($20.00)
Addit.ionrffil.o0)Conceptual Review ($0)
ADDRESS:o F-\ =--
<
I.,EGAI., DESCRIPTION :5-
Subdivision
If properLy is described by
descripLion, please provide
to Lhis applicaEion.
a meets and bounds
on a separate sbeet
legal
and att,ach
ZONING:
DESCRIPTION:
E.
F.NA}48 OF APPI,ICANT:
Mailing Address: Lo
-\ C.-
APPIJICNIIT ' S REPRESEITTTATIVE:G.
H.
NAI'{E OF
Mailinq Address:
I.
,t.
Phone
NAIqE OF OWNER(S):
OTINER(S) STGNATURE:uailing Address:
--_\--
APPIJICATIONS WIIJIJ NOT BE PROCESSED WITHO\E OWNERTS SIGIIjA
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at the
time of submittal of the DRB application. L,ater, when
appLying for a building permit, please identify Lhe accurate
vil-uation of the proposal. The Town of Vail will adjus! the
fee according co the table below, to ensure the correcE fee
is paid.
FEE SCHEDUI,E:
VAI.,UATION$ 0-$ 10,000
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$50,001 '$ 150,000
$150, 001 - $ 5oo, ooo
$500, 001 - $1, 000, 000
$ Over $1,000, 000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPIRES
APPROVAI, I'NI.ESS A BUII,DING PERMIIT IS
IS STARTED.
FEE ,,-/$ 20.00 -
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00. 00
ONE YEAR AFTER FINAIJ
ISSUED AND CONS1IRUCIIION
o
FRE.APPIIICATION MEETTNG :
\"
rr.
A pre-application neet,ing with a member of the planningsLaff is encouraged to deLermine if any additionalapplication informaEion is needed. It is the applicanL'sresponsibility bo make an appointment with the staff todetermine if there are additional submit,tal requirements.Please note that a COMPIJETE applicaEion will st,reamline thereview process for your project.
III. IMPORIAI{T NOTICE REGARDING AI.TIT SUBMISSIONS [O EHE DRB:
A. In addition Lo meet,ing submittal requirements, theapplicanb musL stake and tape the project site t,oindicate property 1ines, building Iines and buildingcorners. All trees to be removed must be taped. Allsite t,apings and staking musE be complet,ed prior Eo the
DRB site visit. The applicanE must, ensure bhat staking
done during the winter is noE buried by snow.
B. The review process for NEw BUIIJDTNGS normally reguires
two separaLe meebings of Ehe Design Review Board: a
conceptual review and a final review.
C. Applicants who faiL to appear before the Design Review
Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not
asked in advance that discussion on their item be
postponed, will have their items removed. from the DRB
agenda unLil- such time as Ehe item has been
republished.
D. The following items may, at the discrebion of the
zoning adninistratorr be approved by the Community
Development Department staff (i.e. a formal hearing
before the DRB may not be required):
a. Windows, skylight,s and similar exEerior changes
which do not alter the exisLing plane of Ehebuilding; and
b. Building addiEions not visibLe from any other lotor public space. AL Lhe Lime such a proposal is
subnit,ted, applicanEs must include leEters from
adjacent property owners and,/or from the agent foror manager of any adjacent condominium association
sbat,ing the associat.ion approves 'of the addition.
E. If a property is Located in almapped hazard area (i.e.
snow avalanche, rockfall, flogd plain, debris flow,
wetLand, eLc.), a hazard study must be submitted andthe owner must, sign an affidatit recognizing the hazardreport prior to the issuance of a building permit.
epplicants are encouraqed to check with a Town Plannerprior to DRB application to determine Ehe relationshipof the property to all mapped'hazards.
f'. For all residential construction:
a. Clearly indicate on Ehe floor plans the inside
face of the exherior strucLural walLs of the
building; and
b. rndicaEe with a dashed line on the site plan afour fooE, disLance from the exterior face of Ehe
building walls or supporting columns.
G. If DRB approves the application wiCh condiLions or
modifications, all conditions of approval must be
addressed prior to Ehe applicagion for a buildingpermit.
o
NEW CONSTRUCTTONIV.
A. Three copies of a recenL t,opographic survey, st,amped bya Colorad.o Professional L,icensed Surveyor, at a scaleof 1" = 20, or larger, on which the followinginformation is provided:
1. IJoL area, and buildable area when different Lhan
1oL area.
2. Iregal description and physical address.
3. Two foot contour intervaLs unless the parcel
consists of 6 acres or more, in which case, 5 |
contour int,ervals may be accepted.
4. Exist,ing trees or groups of trees having Erunkswith diameters of 4" or more, as measured from apoinc one fooL above grade.
5. Rock outcroppings and other significant naLuralfeatures (1arge boulders. intermittent streans,
etc. ) .
6. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall., etc.),centerline of streams or creeks, reguired creek or
stream setback. and 100-year flood p1ain, ifappLicable. Slopes of 40t or more shaIl beclearly delineated by cross batching.
7. Ties to existing benchmark, either uscs landmarkor sewer invert. This information must be clearly
stated on the survey so that all measurements are
baged on the same starting point. This isparticularly inportant for deEermining building
height and driveway slope. See Policy on Survey
Information, for more information regarding
surveys.
8. LocaEions of Ehe following must be shown:
a. Size and tlpe of drainage culverts, swales,
eEc.
b. Exact location of existing utiLity servicelines fron their source to the structure,including: ,
Cable :I,v Sewer GasTelephone wat,ef ELect,ric
c. All utility meter locations, including anypedestals to be locaLed on site or in theright-of-way adjacent to the siEe.
d. Property lines - disLances and bearings and a
basis of bearing.
e. Indicate all easements ident,ified on thesubdivision p1aL.
9. Frovide spoL elevat,ions at the edge of asphalL,along the street frontage of the properLy aEtwenty-five foot intervals (25,1, and a minimum of
one spoE elevaEion on either side of the lot.
B. site Plan
1. Locations of the following must, be ghown:
a. Existing and finished grades.
b. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
c.
c. Proposed driveway, including percent, sLopeand spoL elevations at, the property Line,garage slab and as necessary along thecenterline of the drive to accurately reflect,driveway grade.
d. A 4' concrete drive pan aL Ehe edge ofasphalt for driveways Lhat exit, the street in
an uphilI direcLion.
2, alL exist,ing improvements including structures,
J.andscaped areas, service areas, storage areas.walks, driveways, off-street parking, loadingareas, retaining walls (with top and bottom of
wal.1 spot elevations), and other existing site
improvements.
3. In order t,o deLermine proposed building heights
elevat,ions of all top roof ridges, and eaves when
determined necessary by Lhe zoning administraLor,shall be indicaLed on the site plan with existing
and proposed conLour lines shown underneaLh.
IJandscape PLan (1u = 20'or larger) - 3 copies required1. At a minimum, bhe following information must beprovided on the landscape plan:
a. Location of existing trees 4" diameter orlarger,
b. Type, size and location of all existing and
proposed planE maLerial,
c. Location of all Lrees to be transplanted,
d. A detailed legend of al1 proposed planE
mat,erial including common and Latin names.
2. The locaLion and tlpe of existing and proposed
watering sysLems to be employed in caring for
planu material following its installation.
3. rxisting and proposed contour lines. Retaining
waIIs should be included with the contour
information with top of waII and bottom of walI
eLevations listed.
4. CompLete the attached l-andscape maEerials list.
Sign off from each utilitv comnanv verifying the
l-ocation of util-iLy service and availability (see
at,tached utiLity verificaLion form) .
A preLiminarv t,it.le report Schedul.e A and B must
accompany all subnibLals, to insure properLy ownership
and identify all- easements affecting the subjecEproperty.
F. Architectural Plans (1/8u = L' or larger, t/4" igpreferred scale for review) 3 copies are required.
1. Floor pl.ans and aLl elevaLions of bhe proposed
development drawn to scale and fully dimensioned.
The elevation drawings musL show both existing andfinished grades.
2. One set of fLoor plans must, be rrred-lined" to show
how t,he gross residenLial floor area (GRFA) was
calculated.
3. Exterior materials and colors sha11 be specified
on the abtached materials 1ist. This materiaLslist, musL be completed and submitted as a parL of
the application. Color chips, siding samplesetc., shall be presented at the Design Review
Board meeting. Detaits including, but not Limited
D.
E.
to fascia, trim, railings, chimney cap, meterlocations, etc. must be shown graphically andfu1J.y dimensioned.
Zone check list, (attached) must be compleLed if theproject is located within Lhe Single-Family,
Primary/Secondary or Duplex zone districts.
Photos of the existing site and where applicable, ofadjacent structures.
The Zoninq A&ninistrator'and/or DRB may reguire the
submission of addiLional p1ans, drawings,specifications, samples and other maLerial-s (incLuding
a model) if deemed necessary to determine wheLher aproject will comply with Design Guidelines.
vI.
MINOR AIJTERATIONS TO THE HKTERIOR OF BUIIJDTNGS.
Photos or sketches which clearLy convey Ehe redevelopmentproposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopmenLproposal may be submitted in Lieu of Lhe more formal
requirements set, forLh above, provided all importanL
specifications for the proposal including colors and
maberials to be used are submicced.
N)DITIONS . RESIDENTIAIJ OR CO!,IMERCIAIJ
A. original floor plans vrith all specifications shown.
B. Three seLs of proposed floor plans Lf9'= L' or larger(t/An = 1r is preferred)
C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and
proposed construction, IndicaEe roof ridge elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
D. Elevations of proposed addiLion.
E. Photos of the existing sbrucLure.
F. Specificat,ions for all maLerials and color sanples on
mat,erials lis! (aUtached) . )
At the request of the zoning adninigtratoilyou may also berequired to submit:
G. A sLaLemenL from each utility verifying location of
service and availability. See attached ut,ility
location verification form.
H. A site irnprovement survey, sEamped by regisEered
Colorado ProfessionaL lJicensed surveyor.
I. A preliminary Uit,le report, t,o verify ownership ofproperty, which lisls all easements.
vrr. EINAL-.9.[[,EII4N
once a building permit has been issued, and construction is
underway, and before the guilding Department will schedule a
framing inspection, two copies of an Improvement Location
Certificatse survey (rLC) stamped by a regisLeredprofessional engineer must be submiLLed. The following
information must be provided on Lhe ILC:
A. Buil-ding location(s) with ties to property corners,i.e. disEances and angles.
B. Building dimensions Lo the nearest tenth of a foot.
G.
H.
I.
v.
All ut,ility service line as-bui1ts, showing tlpe ofmaterial used, and size and exact location of lines.
Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
A11 property pins are to be either found or set andstat,ed on improvement survey.
A11 easements.
Garage slab elevations ancl all roof ridge elevaLionswith exisbing and proposed grades shown under Ehe ridgelines.
VIII . CONCEPTUAI, DESIGIN RE|IIIEIV
A. Submittal requirenents: The owner or authorized agentof any project reguiring design approval as prescribed
by this chapter may submit pLans for concepEual review
by the Design Review Board to the DepartmenL of
Community Development., The conceptual review is
intended to give Lhe applicant a basic understanding of
the compatibility of Eheir proposal with the Town's
Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommendedprimarily for applications more complex than single-fanily and Lwo-family residences. However, developersof single-fanily and two-family projects sha11 noL be
excluded from the opportunity to reguest a concepLual
design review. Complete applicalions must be subnit,ted
10 working days prior to a scheduled DRB meeting.
The following information shaIl be submit,Eed for a
conceptual review:
1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum
scale of one inch eguals twenty feeE;
2, Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials
and. a descript,ion of Ehe character of the proposed
structure or st,rucLures;
3. SufficienL informaLion Lo show the proposal
complies with the development standards of the
zone districL in which the project is to be
locaLed (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations,
number of parking spaces, letc.);
4. completed DRB application form.
B. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for
conceptual design review, the pepartmenE of Community
Development shal1 review the submitEed materials for
greneral compliance with the appropriaEe requirements of
the zoning code. If the proposaL is in basic
compliance with the zoning code reguirenenLs, theproject sha1l be forwarded !o'the DRB for concepLualreview. If the application is noL generally in
compliance with zoning code requiremenLs, theapplication and submitt,al maLerials sha11 be reLurned
Eo the applicant, wiuh a written explanation as bo why
the Community Development Department staff has found
the project, noE eo be in compliance with zoning code
requiremenEs. Once a complete application has been
received, the DRB sha11 review the submitted concepEual
review application and supporting materiaL in order to
determine whether or not the project generally conplies
with the design guidelines. The DRB does not voLe on
conceptual reviews. The property owner or his
representative sha11 be present aE Ehe DRB hearing.
c.
D.
E.
G.
H.
I,IST OF UATERIAIJS
NAII{E OF' PROiIECT:
LEGAIJ DESCRIPTION: LOT_ BIJOCK _ SITBDMSION
,STREET ADDRESS:
The following information is required for submit,t,al Lo the Design
Review Board before a finaL approval can be given:
A. BUILDING !|ATERIA&S: TYPE OF MATERIAL COIloR
Roof
Sicling
other wall Maberials
Fascia
Soffi ts
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining wal1s
Exterior Lighting
OUher
t-r
B. LAIIIDSCAPING: NAME Of DESigNET:
Phone:
o
Conunon Name
o
PIJAIiIT MATERIAIJS: BoE,anical- Name OuantiEv Size*
PROPOSED TREES
AI{D SHRUBS
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliperfor deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height forconiferous trees. Minimum height, for coniferoustrees is 5 feet.**rndicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimun size of shrubs is
5 qaLlon.
TvDe Square Footage
GROI'ND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROI,
C. ITAIIDSCAPE LTIGHTING: If exEerior lighting is proposed, please
show the number of fixLures and locations on a separate
J.ighbing plan. Idencify each fixture from the lighting pLan
in the space beLow and provide the height above grade, tlpe of
light proposed, lumen output, luminous area and a cuL sheet of
the light f ixture. (Secsion 18.54.050 ,J)
D. OTHER IJAI{DSCAPE FEATURES (retaining waIIs, fences, swimming
poo1s, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining
walLs. Maxinum height of wal1s within the front setback is
3 | . Maximum height of wal1s elsewhere on the property is 6' .
revlge{ 8/17 /91
'JOB,I{AME
trOTIN OF VAIIJ UTII'ITY IJOCAEION VERTFICATTON FORM
SUBDIVTSION
LOT BI,OCK FIIJING
ADDRESS
The form is used t,o verify service availabiliEy and location. This
shouLd be used in conjunction with preparing your uLility plan and
scheduLing instalLacions. For any new consErucEion proposal , the
applicanL must provide a completed utility verificaLion form.
The location and avail-ability of ut,ilit,ies, whether they be main
trunk lines or proposed lines, musL be approved and verified by the
foLLowing ut,ilities for the accompanying site p1an.
AlL auLhorizing signatures need bo be originals.
Authorized Siqnature Date
U.S. wesL Conmunications
468-6860 or 949-4530
PubLic Service Company
949 -613s
Gary HalL/Rich Cooley
Holy Cross ElecLric Assoc.
949 -5892 Engineering Depu.
Ted Husky/Michae1 lJaverty
rITCI Cablevision of Lhe Rockies
949 -t224
Mark Graves
**upper EagJ.e valley WaLer
& sanitation DisEricE *
47 6 -7 480
Fred Haslee
ttA Eite plan is required. Physical i.ocagion of known utilities
nust, be showlr on the site plan. Utility locations nay or may noE
offer senrice to the property line. Any utilittl extension required
sba1l be tbe responsibility of tbe propertsy owner.
NOTE: 1. If a uLility company has goncerns with the proposed
consLrucLion, the utility'representative should not
alireculy on Lhe utility vqrification form LhaE Ehere
is a problem which needs t,o be resolved. The issue
should then be spelled out, in detail in an aEtached
LeLter to Lhe Town of vail. However. pLease keep in
nind that it is the responsibility of the utility
company Lo resolve identified problems.
2. If Ehe utility verification form has signatures from
each of the ut,ility companles, and no commenLs are
nade directly on the form, the Town will presume
Ehat, Ehere are no problems and thau the development
can proceed.
3. These verifications do noL relieve Ehe contracLor ofhis responsibility to obtain a street, cut permit
from the Town of vail-, Deparement, of Pub1ic Works
and to obtain utilitv locations before digginq in
any public right-of-way or easemenL in Ehe Town of
vail. A buildino oermiL is not a street cut oermit.
A street cut permiE muse be obLained separatseLy.
4. InsLallation of service lines are at t.he expense and
responsibiliLy of the Broperty owner'
DATE:
ZONE CHECK
.FOR
Single ramily Residence, Duplex, Primary/Secondary
ZONE DISTRICTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot
-
Block
-
Subdivision
ADDRESS:
ZONE DISTRICT
ARCHITECT
I,OT SXZE
P}IONE
PIIONE
PROPOSED USE
-
I{eight,
TOEAl GRFA
Primary GRFA
secondary GRr'A + W=
' SeLbacks FronL 20'Sides 15'
BUIIJDABIJE IJOT AREA
Allowed ExisEinq ProDoscd Total
/
15',
+425=
Rear
SiEe Coverage
Landscaping
Retaining WalI lteighLs 3'/6'
Parking
Carage Credib
Drive:
Reqrd Encl
(300) (600) (900) (1200)
Permit[od sloPe % ProPosed Slope %
Complies with T.O.V. LighLing Ordinance Yes No
WaLer Course SeLback (30) (50)
Do Finish Grades Exceed 2:1 (501) " YEs- No
EnvironmenLal./I{azards: 1) Flood Plain
2) PercenL SLoPe (< > 30t)
3 ) GeoJ-ogic rlazards
a) Snow Avalanchq
b) Rockf aLl.c) Debris flow
4) wetlands
View Corridor EncroachmcnE: Yes No,
Daes lhis req'riesL invvive ,n 250 titiriiLir.ru? .::-ll;;-*Gh-of ttre allowed 2S0 lddttlon 1s used wlLh shis roquest?
Previous condit'ions of approval (check properuy fire) :
tt
TOWNOFVAIL
DEPANTUE}iT OF COMMU}iITI' DE!'ELOPMENT
7/'/,^*1-_27 v,5
CHECHS MADE PAYABI.E TO TOWN OF VAIL
ACO'I'NTN{'.ITEM lr(I Tlx ' cqntr'a roTll.
0l 00fi) 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $5.O0
0t 00()042415 UMFORM BUILDING CODE s54.OO
0l 0fr)0 424 r 5 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE !iJ9.00
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE ti37.00
0l 000042415 I.JNIFORM FIRE CODE sl6.o0
0l 00(X)42415 NAT]ONAL ELECTRICAL CODE s17.00
0 | 0000 4241 5 OTIIER CODE BOOKS
0l 00m 41548 BLUE PRINTS (MYLARS)s7.00
0l 00tn42412 XEROX COPIES $0.25
0l 00()042412 STUDIES
0t 0w 424t2 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM $5.00
0l Oftn 42371 PENALTY f EES / RE-INSPECTIONS
0t 00(n 41332 PLAN REVII]W RE-CFIECKFEE IS4O PER HR.I
0l 00ffi 42332 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
0l 0000 4 1412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
0t 0000 41413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE $20.00
0l 0000414t3 ADDII'IONAL SIGNAGL FEL, tSI.OO PER SQ.}.T.1
0l 00004:
0l 0008-4
VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE 5(O.
0l 0000 42371 I}IVESTIGATION FEE (BUILDINC)
3100m45 0 I(-)V PARI(I NCi }UNL)
0l 0tr)0 22027 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPENSER FUND* 0t 0000 2llt2 'I AXABLE (a) 40lo (S'IATE)* 0I 0000 410t0 'I-AXABLE (a/ 4% (TO\\'N)
0l 00m42371 BUILDING INVESTIGATION
OTIIER
PEC APPLICATION FEES
0l 00(n41330 ADDI I-IONAL URFA "]50"s200.00
0l 00q) 41330 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT s200.00
0l 00(x) 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION ILESS TTIAN IOO SO.FT.I $200.00
0l 0000 41330 EXTER]OR ALTERATION IMORE TITAN 1OO SQ.FT.$500.00
0l 00m 41330 SPECIALDEVELOPMENTDISTRICT I'NEWI $1.5$.00
0l 00m41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TMAJOR AMEND s I.0(ru.00
0l 0000 41 330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IM]NOR AMEND s200.00
0l 00004t330 SUBDIVISION
0t 00m41330 VARIANCE $250.00t0l 00fi) 41330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS $250.00
0l 00004t330 Rb - ZONING $z00.otl
OTHER
OTHER
ltuti\Li €-/g '
t,tllt
cAsEr-,*.r, ltl' l,".ot,u,,'"fllul"
I I
a.-.
.d,il.-.-,:."; ' ---,r* '
Tfll^l}{ crF (rFl.I l-
' l'liscel la-reoug Cagh
I P_r-;,Li- :r L|
EecE i ,,i t. +[ i E "'.':'.,Fc':*uii r h rJi.. ft .t r_1r-t i ,
ffPriiile HEL;:ll i i!'EF'f;I[ i:F;= F=E
Flrn,::,un t 'i.Bnde i-*rj .:' :!i, l:t:;
f r.ern pa: d
B 1fl8fi84:.:f,:.:lriii
f,h.::rrg;: t-:! l.f i : j,:r'.j .,
THFTF{I{ 'JBIJ]
I,rc'r-, r :.ssh ie r i"iEiE,i
frmgun? pai,J
j;J. Lll:1
FJ.&8
Best
coPY
Arailable
Proiecl Name:
Proiect Oescription:
Owner, Address and Phone:
o
Project Application
3q4^s e.s qhevL
of
zo'=
Architect. Address and Phone: ' f
Com ments:
Contact Person and Phone
Legal Descriptioni Lot
Design Review Board
Motion bv: ' B-L kd<
s."ono"o or, K{4.y LooJen*oC/,f 1o pre =-e
{-21-'6(<{M!lf* L
E statt Approval
oo
DRB APPLICATTON - TOI{N OF \'tArr,, COLORjADO
O '"0"" d, slalsL
*tt'O OUt O too"
I.
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB IMEETING:
I********f*
TSIS APPLICATTON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
T'NTII. AI|IJ REQUIRED INAORMATION IS SUBITITTED**t*******
PROTfECT TNFORMATION:
IA. DESCRrprroN: \ytg_, rcrylogtA
c.
D.
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction ($200.00)Minor Alteration ($20.00)
Addition (S50.00)Conceptual Rgview (t0[
va,,-G-ADDRESS lb3 ^ atbsTLEGAL DESCRIPTION: LoT S BIocK @ . T
subdivisio" V ft+ U \/ eUu n ro= f7T! fiulNE
ff property is described by a meets and bounds legaldescription, please provide on a separate sheet andattach to this application.
&gAenhhl
F.
G.NAME OF APPLICANT:
ZONING:
LOT AREA: If required,
st.amped survey showj.ng
applicant must provide a currentlot area.
NAME OF
Mailing
iling Addres'q:
APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATTVE :
Address:
H.
I.
Phone
Condominlum Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE| DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe time of subrnittal of DRB application. Later, whenapplying for a building permit, please identify theaccurate valuation of the proposal . The Town of VailwiII adjust the fee according to the table below, toensure the correct fee is paid.
FEE PATD:
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION0 - $ 10,000
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$ 50,001 - $ 150, ooo
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ Over $1r 000,000
J.
K.
{v beFEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
9400.00
$s00.00
* DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR EFTER FINAL
APPROVIII UNI.ESS A BUILDING PERMIT IS TSSUED AND CONSTRUCTTON IS
STARTED.
r*NO.APPIICATTON WTLL BE PROCESSED T{ITSOUI OWNER'S SIGNATURE
1
*SIGNATI'RE (S) :Mailing Address:
^_
NA}{E OF PROJECT:
I,EGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P
The following information is
Review Board before a final
RaiIs
BLOCK
wr
reguired for submlttal to the Design
approval can be given:
LOT_
A.BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Mat,erials
TYPE OF I,TATERIAL cotoR
Fascia
Sof.f its
l{indows
Window Tri.n
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck
FIues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
LAIIDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
Phone:
PLANT I.IATERIAIS: Botanical Name Comrnon Nane Ouantitv Size*
PROPOSED TREES
B.
.. f EXTSTTNG TREE^f rO
2K BE REMovED C ,r:\ - - I.(l ) zc'r:-Sgttue-
*fndicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimun caliper fordeciduous trees is 2 inches. fndlcate height for coniferoustrees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet.
-.. traLr .l '\r rd f'!.u.ellsx -4.*
PRoPosEDQRut
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minlnum size of shrubs ls5 qal"lon.
Tvpe Square Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterlor llghting is proposed, please
show the number of fixtures and locat,ions on a separatelighting plan. Identify each fixture from the light,ing plan
on the list below and provlde the grattage, height abovegrade and type of light proposed.
D. OTHER I"ANDSCAPE rEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimmingpoo1s, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwalls. Maximum height of walLs within the front setback is3 feet. Maximum beight of walls elsewhere on the propertyis 6 feet.
!.llllUllUt I lY dltleol
/{
Rtc'D oEC 5 tew
DRB APPIJTCATTON - TOWN OF VATL,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED:
DATE OT DRB UEETING:
COI.oRADO
/2-1-qz
I.
rrrrs rPPLrcAr#; ?r1;:iio, ", A..EPTED
UNTIIT AIJIr REQUIRED fNSORllATrON I8 SUBUITTED*t*aal*a**
PROJECT INFORIIATION:
A. DEscRrprrow: ln t4w- r'\tN"'-)r,OJ t*t ?t-kr
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Constructlon
Addition
ADDRESS:c.
D.
V uinor Alteration
-
Conceptual Review
I,EGAL DESCRIPTION: LoI 5 BIocK (1
Subdivl-slon \/AIL Vtt-t-W 1T'l fztNG
If property is described by a meets and bounds legaldescription, please provide on a separate sheet andattach to this appLication.
ZONING:
LOT AREA: If required, applicant
stanped survey showing lot area.
G. NAME OF APPLICANr T Ag EEEENMaillng Address'. * !rc,tu^E +:f,Phone 47b. 24Gb
NAUE OF APPLICANTISMailing AddreEs:
\./A,lL t-11,>47
,$id
E.
F.must provide a current
\,/.^tL
REPRESENTATIVE:H.
I.
Phone
Phone
NAI.TE OF OI{NERS:
*8IGNAIURE(8I SMalllng Addlss:
\/ArU-
condominium Approval tf appricable . ,tht A fafeh,
DRB FEE: DRB fees are paLd at the time of issuance of a v
buildlng permlt.
,.o
*Project Application
o^r" t4y'/z
Proiect Name:
Project DescriPtion:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
4q33
y'za:z/az
Architect, Address and Phone:.rez .'canbrT '/tskdt a/ate
LesalDescriprion,tot y' ,Btocx C . ,ru,^n l/a"/k//nqc ?4 ,r"^. //S
Comments:
Design Review Board
,^," s/y'/1 z
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAT
i#
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Slaff Approval
I
JI
r.
O O revised s/4/sL
APPLICAUoN - TotlN oF \IAIL, COronooffiq MAy Oq pp
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED a 4,72DATE OF DRB MEETING:
O reviced g/4/gL
DRB
**********
TETS APPLIqATION T|ILL NOT BE ICCEPTED
I'}fTIL AI.L REQUIRED INFORIIATION IS ST'ETfITTED**********
PROJECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPT]ON:
New Construct j-on ($200. OOI !=ruinor Alteration ($20.00)
Addition (950.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
C. ADDRESS:
Block Q ,
Maili-ng Address:
H.NAME OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE:Mail+ng Address: t4\ <- t FEOMTAT
YAJ| . CO Phone
I.t
NAME OF OWNERS: A4 4 etai(l6 ZATOT,.L
*SIGNATTIRE (S} :Mailing Address:
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe time of submittal of DRB application. Later, whenapplying for a building permit, pl-ease identify the
accurate valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vailwill adjust the fee according to the table below, to
ensure the correct fee is paj-d. I nnp.
EF.F'PAI,D: S b lu'
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION$ 0 - $ 10,000I 10,001- - $ 50,000
$ 50,001 - $ 150,000
$150,001, - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ Over 91,0001 000
* DESIGN NAVTEW BOARD EPPRO\ZEI EXPIRES ONE YE,AR AI'TER ATNAL
APPROVAIJ I'NLESS A BUU'DING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND CONSTRUCTION IS
STARTED.
**NO APPI.ICATION WILL BE PROCESSED IIITEOUT OIfNER'S SIGNATT'RE
TYPE OF REVIEW:
D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Subdivision
If property is described bydescription, please provide
attach to this application.
a meets and bounds legal
on a separate sheet and
E. ZONING:
NAME OF APPL]CANT:
LOT AREA: If requi-red, applicant
stamped survey showing lot area.
must provide a current
FEE
) ZU. UU
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
,A(U/
,yfr\,
-a
-PRE-APPLICATION MEETING :II.
A pre-application meeting with a member of the planning
staff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additionalapplication information is needed. It is the applicant'sresponsibility to make an appointment with the staff to
determine if there are additional submittal requirements.
Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamfine theapproval process for your project.
III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
A. In addition to meeting subnittal requirements, theapplicant must stake and tape the project site toindicate property lines, building lines and buildingcorners. A11 trees to be rernoved must be taped. A11site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the
DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking
done during the winter is not buried by snow.
B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires
Lwo separate meelings of the Design Review Board: aconceptual approval and a final approval . Applicants
should plan on presenting their development proposal ata minj.mum of two meetings before obtaining fj.na1
approval.
C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review
Board on their scheduled meeting date and who frave not
asked in advance that discussion on their item bepostponed, will have their itens removed from the DRB
docket until such time as the item has been
republished.
D. The following items may, at the discretion of thezoning administrator, be approved by the Community
Development Department staff (j-.e. a formal hearing
before the DRB may not be reguired):
a. Windows, skylights and sinilar exterior changes
which do not after the existing plane of thebuilding,' and
b. Building addition proposals not visible from anyother 1ot or public space. At the time such aproposal is submitted, applicants must includel-etters from adjacent property owners and/or fromthe agent for or manager of any adjacent
condominium association stating the association
approves of the addition.
E. If a property is located in a napped hazard area (i.e.
snow avaLanche, rockfall, flood p1ain, debris flow,
wetland, etc)r a hazard study must be submitted and the
ohrner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard
report prior to the issuance of a building pernit.
Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Plannerprior to DRB application to determine the relationship
of the property to al-l- mapped hazards.
F. For all residential construction:
a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the inside
face of the exterior structural walls of thebuilding; and
b. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan afour foot distance from the exterior face of the
bui-lding wa1ls or supporting coJ-umns.
c. If DRB approves the applicaLion with conditions ormodifications, all conditions of approval must be
resolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit.
I
I
.f
\
V
rv. r"r.i*rr*u.G
i A. Three copies of a recent topoqraphic survev, stamped bva licensed survevor, at a scafe of L" = 20' or larger,
on which the following information is provided:
1. Lot area.
2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcel
consists of 6 acres or more, in whj.ch case, 5,contour intervals nay be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunkswith diameters of 4" or more, as measured from apoint one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant naturalfeatures (large boulders, intermittent streams,
etc. ) .
5. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.),centerline of st.ream or creek, required creek or
stream setback, 100-year flood plain and slopes of40t or more, if applicable.
6. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmarkor sewer invert. This information should beclearly stated on the survey so that all
neasurements are based on the same starting point.
This is particularly important for height
measurements. See Policy On Survey Information,for more information regarding surveys.
7. Locations of the following:a. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales,etc. must be shown.
b. Exact location of existing utility sources
and proposed service lines from their sourceto the structure. Utilities to include:
Cab1e TV Sewer GasTelephone Water Electric
c. Show all utility meter locations, including
any pedestals to be focated on site or in theright-of-way adjacent to the site. RevocabLepermits from the Town of VaiI are requiredfor improvements in the right-of-way.
d. Property lines - distances and bearings and abasis of bearing must be shown.
e. All- easements (Title report must also incfudeexisting easement Iocat ions )
8. Existing and finished grades.
9. Provide spot elevations of the street, and a
minimum of one spot el"evation on either side ofthe lot, 25 feet out from the side property lines.
B. Site Plan
1. Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spotelevations must be shown.
2. All existing improvements incJ-uding structures,
landscaped areas, service areas, storage areas,waIks, driveways, off-street parking, Ioading
areas, retaining walls (with top and bottom ofwall spot elevations)r and other existing site
improvements.
V
and proposed grades shown underneath). These .
elevations and grades must be provided in orderfor the staff to determine building hei_ght. Allridge lines should be indicated on the site plan.Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicated
on the site plan with corresponding finished andexisting grade elevations.
4. Driveway grades may not exceed 8* unless approvedby the Town Engineer.
Landscape Pl-an (1rr = lQr or larger) - 3 copies reguired
1. The following information must be provided on the
Landscape pLan. The l-ocation of existing 4t'
dj-ameter or larger trees, the location, size,
spacing and type (common and latin nane) of allexisting and proposed plant material. All treesto be saved and to be removed nust also beindicated. The plan rnust also differentiate
between existing and proposed vegetation.
2. Complete the attached landscape materials list.
3. The l-ocation and type of existing and proposed
watering systems to be employed in caring forplant materj.al following its installation.
4. Existing and proposed contour 1ines.
In order to clarify the inter-rel-ation of the various
development proposal components, please incorporate as
much of the above information as possible onto the siteplan.
Siqn off from each utilj-tv companv verifying theIocation of utility service and availabilit.y (see
attached) .
A preliminarv title report must accompany allsubmittals, to insure property ownership and locationof all easements on property.
Architectural PLans (1/8" = 1r or larger, 1-/4" ispreferred scale for review) 3 copies required,
l-. Scaled floor plans and all elevations of theproposed development. Elevations must show bothexisting and finished grades.
2. One set of floor plans must be I'red-lined" to show
how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was
cal-cuIated.
Reductj-ons of all elevations and the site plan (8-
L/2" x L!"1 for inclusion in PEC and/or Town
Councll memos may be requested.
4. Exterior surfacing materials and material colorsshall be specified on the attached materials list.This naterials list nust be completed and
submitted as a part of DRB appli-cation. Colorchips, siding samples etc., shouLd be presented tothe Design Review Board meeting.
Zone check list (attached) must be completed if project
is located within the Single-Fami1y, Primary/Secondary
or Duplex zone districts.
Photos of the existing site and where applicable, of
adjacent sLructures.
j
NOTE:
IJ
.r. rhe zonif Administrator and,/or onely require the- submission of additional plans, drawings,specifications, samples and other materials (including
a nodel) if deemed necessary to determine whether aproject wiII comply with Design Guidelines.
V. MINOR ALTERJATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS.
Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopmentproposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopmentproposal rnay be submitted in l-ieu of the more formal
requirement.s set forth above, provided all importantspecifications for the proposal including colors andmaterials to be used are subnitted.
VI. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A. Original floor plans with alI specifications shown.
B. Three sets of proposed floor plans L/8" = Lt or larger(I/4" = L' is preferred)
C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and
proposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
D. Elevations of proposed addition.
E. Photos of the existj.ng structure.
F. Specifications for all materials and color samples onmaterials list (attached).
At the request of the Zoning Administrator you may also be
required to submit:
G. A statement from each utility verifying location ofservice and availability. See attached utilitylocation verification form.
H. A siLe i-mprovement survey, stamped by registeredprofessional surveyor.
L A preliminary title report, to verify ownership ofproperty, which lists aII easements.
VII. FINAL SITE PLAN
Once a building permit has been issued, and construction is
underway, and before the Building Department will schedule aframing inspection, two copies of an Improvement Location
Certificate survey (ILC) stanped by a registeredprofessional engineer must be submitted. The followinginformation must be provided on the ILC:
A. Building location(s) with ties to property corners,i.e. distances and angles.
B. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot.
C. A11 utility service line as-builts, showing type ofmaterial used, and size and exact location of lines.
D. Drainage as-bui1ts.
E. Basis of bearing Lo tie to section corner.
F. A11 property pins are to be either found or set and
stated on improvement survey.
G. A11 easements.
H. Building floor efevations and all roof ridge elevations
with existing and proposed grades shown under the ridge
1ines.
VIII .CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEI!
of any project requiring design approval as prescribed
by this chapter may submit plans for conceptual review
by the Design Review Board to the Department of
Community Development. The conceptual review is
int.ended to give the applicant a basic understanding ofthe compatibility of their proposal with the Town's
Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommendedprimarily for applications more complex than single-family and two-famj-1y residences. However, deveJ-opersof single-family and two-family projects shall not be
excluded from the opportunity to reguest a conceptual
design review. Complete applications must be subnitted
10 days prior to a scheduled DRB meeting.
The following information shall be submitted for a
conceptual. review:
1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimumscale of one inch equals twenty feeti
2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials
and a description of the character of the proposed
structure or structures;
3. Sufficient informat.ion to show the proposal
complies with the development standards of the
zone district in which t.he project is to belocated (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations,
number of parking spaces, etc.)t
4. Conpleted DRB application form.
B. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for
conceptual design review, the Department of Conmunity
Development shaLl review the submitted materials forgeneral compliance with the appropriate requirements ofthe zoning code. If the proposal is in basic
compliance with the zoning code requirernents, theproject shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptualreview. If the application is not generally in
compliance with zoning code requirements, the
application and submittal materials shall be returnedto the applicant with a written explanation as to why
the Community Development Department staff has found
the project not to be in compJ-iance with zoning coderequirements. Once a complete application has beenreceived, the DRB shall review the submitted conceptual
review application and supporting material in order to
determine whether or not the project generally complieswith the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote on
conceptual reviews. The property owner or his
representative shal1 be present at the DRB hearing.
The owner ?.u.norized alent ,
t
o LIST OF MATERIALS
NAME OF PROJECT:
IEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK SUBDMSION
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The followj-ng information is required for subnittal to the Design
Review Board before a final approval can be given:
A. BUTLDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATER]AL COLOR
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
9{i-ndow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
h-l lchl tt r..r c
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
Phone:
PLANT MATERIALS: Botani-ca1 Name Common Name Ouantity Size*
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees, Minimum caliper for
deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferoustrees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 5 feet.
PLANT MATERIa: Botanical Name
PROPOSED SHRUBS
Ouantitv. Size*
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size5 qallon.of proposed shrubs.
Tvpe
Minimum size of shrubs is
Square Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
soD
J I!]:, U
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please
show the number of fixtures and locations on a separatelighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting plan
on the list below and provide the wattage, height abovegrade and type of light proposed.
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimmingpools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwalIs. Maxj.mum height of wall,s within the front setback is3 feet. Maximum height of walLs elsewhere on the property
is 6 feet.
D.
;SUBDIVISION
LITY LOCATION VERIFICATI
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The location and availability of utilities, whether they be maintrunk l-ines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified bythe folfowing utilities for the accompanying site p1an.
Authorized Siqnature re.
U.S. West Communications
t-800-922-L98't
468-6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
9 4 9-57 81
Gary HaI1
HoIy Cross Elect.ric Assoc.
949-5892
Ted Husky/laichael Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.V.
94 9-5530
Steve Hiatt
Upper Eagle Val1ey Water
& Sanitation District *
4'7 6-'7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE:This form is to verify service availability and
Iocation. Thj-s should be used in conjunction withpreparing a utility plan and schedulinginstall-ations.
For any new construction proposal, the applicant
must provide a completed utility verification
form.
3. If a utility company has concerns with the
proposed consLruction, the utility representative
should note directly on the utility verification
form that there is a problen which needs to beresolved. rf the issue is relatively complicated,it should be spelled out in detail in an attachedletter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep
in mind that it is the responsibility of theutility company and owner to resolve identified
problems.
4. If the utility verification form has signatures
from each of the utility companies, and no
comments are made directly on the form, the Town
will presume that there are no problems and that
the development can proceed.
5. These verifications do not relieve the contractor
of his responsibility to obtain a street cutpermit from the Town of Vail, Department of Public
Works and to obtain utility locations before
diqqinq in any public right-of-way or easement in
the Town of Vail. A buildinq pernit is not a
street cut pernit, A street cut permj-t must be
obtained separately.
* Please bring a site pfan, fLoor plan, and elevations when
obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation signatures. Fireflow needs must be addressed.
o
SFR
DATE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot
ADDRESS:
ZONE CHECK
FOR
, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRIC
Block _ Fiting
o
TS
a
I
OhINER PHONE
PHONE
ALlowed Existinq Proposed TotaI
(30) (33)
ARCHITECT
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
**LOT SIZE
He j.ght
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course Setback
Site Coverage
Landscaping
Retainj-ng Wall Heights
Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
+425=
+425=
20'
15,
15'
(30) (s0)
/
3'/6'
Reqrd
(300) (600) (e00) (1200)_
Permitted Slope 8* Actual Slope
Date approved by Town Engineer:
View Corridor Encroachment: Yes No '> a')
Environmental,/Haz ards :1) Flood Plain
2, Percent Slope
3) Geologic Hazardsa) Snow Avalancheb) Rockfallc) Debris Flow4) Wetlands
Previous conditions of approval (check property file)-i
Does this resuest invofve a 250 Addition?
How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this request?
**Note: Under Sections 18 .12.090 (B) and L8 .1,3.080 (B) of the Municipal
Code, lots zoned Two Farnily and Primary/Secondary which are less than
15r000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The
Community Development Department may grant an exception to this
restriction provided the applicant meets the criteria set forth under
Sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code including
permanently restricting the unit as a fong-term rental unit for fult-
tj-me employees of the Upper Eagle Valley.
1n
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SALES ACTION FORM
*^*, \N**.."^t"S,\,N
ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS01 0000 41540
UMFORMBUILDING CODE01 0000 42415
UMFORM PLUMBING CODE01 0000 42415
UMFORM MECHANICAL CODE01 0000 42415
01 0000 42415
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE01 0000 42415
OTHER CODEBOOKS01 0000 42415
XEROX COPIES / STUDIES01 00M42412
PENALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTIONS0r 0000 42371
PLAN REVIEW RE-CHECK FEE t$40 PER HR.0l 0000 41332
OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES0l 000042322
CONTRACTORS UCENSES FEES0r 0000 41412
0l 000041330
SIGN APPLICATION FEE0l 0000 41413
ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE FEE I$I.OO PER SO.FT.0l 0000 41413
VTC ART PROJECT DONATION0l 0000 42,140
PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE0l 0000 41331
CON'DITIONAL USE PERMIT0l 0000 41330
EXTEzuOR ALTERATION0l 0000 41330
EXTERIOR ALTERATION TMORE THAN 1OO SO.FT.0l 0000 41330
0l 0000 41 330
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMAJOR AMENTD0l 0000 41330
SPECIAL DEVET,OPMENT DISTRICT IMINOR AMEND0l 0000 41330
0l 0000 41330
0t 000041330
0l 0000 41330
0l 0000 41330
\\ b.rv,, '. \E\cn 'ts
oa
'l
tf
t/,ar
/TffLE,/D€,@
o++ceg- {: o
€lc'N."tl L,t{Cons
PROJECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPTION:
ra."aL
;t,
()
IPP&ICATION - TOHI$ OF VAIL, COIORADOpffn [,lnv n A ,^^^ -)rDo[tTD MAY O4 pW
"".DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED !: /f,1A
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
reviged 9/419L
**ttttrt*t
TNIS EPPLICITION WILL NOT BEI'NTIL EI,L REQUIRED ITTFORTdATION*****t**t*
ACCEPIEDIS ST'B}IITTED
I.
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction
Addition (950.00)
ADDRESS:
($200. OOt -!]'*.-uinor Alteration
Conceptual Review
($20.00)
($0)
D.
F.
G.
LEGAL DESCRIPT]ON: LoI 5 Block (n
subdivisi." Y*tt.. @Aaa W
ZONING:
LOT AREA: If required, applicant nust provide a currentstamped survey showing lot area.
NAME OF APPLICANT:Mailing Address:
NAME OF APPTICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:Mailing Address:. l*tt 4, FEONI-A\(All .- CO - Phone
If property is described bydescription, pJ"ease provideattach to this appli-cation.
a meets and bounds legal
on a separate sheet and
.T.
K.
NAME OF OWNERS:
*srcl{AtuRE(s):
Mailing Address:
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe time of submittal of DRB application. Later, whenapplying for a building permit, please identify theaccurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vailwill adjust the fee according to the table below, toensure the correct fee is paid.
FEE PAID: $
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATIONs 0 - $ 1o,oo0$ 10,001 - $ 50r 000
$ 50,001 - s 150,000
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500r 001 - s1r 000,000$ Over $1r 000,000
FEEs 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
9s00.00
* DESIGN REVIE}J BOARD EPPROVAI EXPIRES ONE YEAR II'TER TINAI.
TPPROVAI, I'NLESS A BUILDING PERMII IS ISST'ED ATTD CONSIRI'CIION IS
STARTED.
**NO APPTICATION TTILL BE PROCESSED VIITEOUE OgfI{ER'S SIGIIATT'RE
oz
F
=t
UI
o-\
C.l
U)
uJ
uJu-
tr
=t
uJ(L
\$\ss
@o\
F
zH
E
,tlcd,aI o1...
l-t" takholo:
l>iq
lrlll8sr{k
tP 32
15'1=
i3 HEr= E=
u
z
C
z
:
0
s
:
l5
I IJJ
^to; t>
o t-
: \|l-
.O rr Jl*3\)\lxA\Yo- \ lFts ,liC \1.1B, il5o-. tt-F\ \\lx
{, -\JI-5 -tBlEb\);o \o8lx
(! IUJc . ucrtr -t/l.r -\ l<: \2
ec-.'-19
E
6
0)
o) ,."
.E .f:
=//a!/6 r, I
- lr Y
e t)z
J / '-./6,,)'/$.'
I otla Fl!
S ^li3 -ll
.lP zl I> <llI rdll- -rl I()lo
ot:6.Y''=oU)X(disn9EEa
F e *€.;E E 8F!Ec
€ 6P:ec-o>'' I s:E^ S=:gF:; >=:
c :'" t!
35;5
EEiR
=Fq,^*OOc
.j; o >
eoeF
Elseo, (5 o--$E; e
oiEot
s €:€
i!: s Eo tsE'"Z;):9EEi:
-*::6 0'-.:
.fr (D €.=
-s,F € 5
or ? 3c
=E>.=o(6=;
E:FJJ;*;E9E-o -
P 5 gg
.if ca(\
co
e
F
=
uJ
o-
z
=l
xo
UJ-oz
.J UJJllJ
2
=
(L
J
z
u,
=
u,l
uJ
z
tr
UJ
uJt
(D
BuJ
5
II,J
z
6
uJ
F6
UJ
:)
2
uJJ
x
ul
f
al',
uJ
UJl!t
=
u,c
J
F
F
oz
oJ
(D
9EF()
J
II,J
z
C)
=J
2
IIJ
E
F.l
FT
H
NOTMIVA
I
It=r',>EF
-r")6Eu.t*F
= o or lr
;E
]Ezze-a
F O. 4R;; =ilZ;()P? Bo q i'c'g Erq fFaorO
()2HHaHt
z
tr
s
LL
o-
c
IIJ
N
a
L!E
z
E
o
NUz9
e
uJF
3
z
ll
=zlzOatr rr.J<Oo<
5H
xrLbo<z
trz
2=
d6BtrOI
ql
-lfti
llJzY
O
F
F
2
tr
5
U)z
I
I
-+
_l
I
;
Fl
F
il
Fl
zl
zl
.. >loulo
TU
uJzaF
(r
LU
)
z
Eoo
z
F
d
c.t
I
r!tr
Fl=*i
z
(t=
=e
=2.
(! lJ-
F
ltl(L
ILo:!!dvE<
^-rog)E2e9tt ir
?r
EFo14otr
\rl'=AO=5+, H'EE 5
=E R
=s E
=i i
UJoo
|>lnnl#!
I
l
.o
Fo
Ht\
trl
s
FfH
Ff
r-'.1
o
=u-
Ha
z
H
F-l
UJ
zo
'_)
HI
F.1l
Frlvl
HI4l.l
IIJI
=4
illrdlt4I<lt-r I@l
EI
!El
*dsti
I
3l
CTI-{
=
\o-$(\
I
-
l
t
FlH
F g
(4urcl
q{
E Eo
H
z
HH
F
anz
(!
tr
I<lllFl
-1 |-l
I
^l>l
anl
uJl
1l
<l>l
rr.l
>l
BI
:71FI
\f
CN
I
c!
EE
E
H
J
lt
z
3
F tr
(
uI
F
=e
z
ci
LIJ
)
l!oz;o =E
lJ-
z
oul
J
l!
z
3
F
uJ
LUF
uJz3
F
UJ
tsa
<FCOuJ<z.t[!Ft,l z
<o()F
-<-E;F-2.
^o-o
zF-
=dfF)z(IO
<;
:IF?Q
=tYZ
=g
E
t-E i;
=
\JZ
i <_>fifl=a
$
1
F
2
I'i
/'1
4
/1't
/.
ltt
Eoooa
z
FILlllY
UJ
c0
o
Ft
TE
Hg|!q
i.;
x>1\., <rE
I
Hurbkzo
E lB
= liE. IJlfl l-
o-z9l-o3
E,Fazo()
rR|r..lYlSv/J=
aftul
UJ
lJ-
F
=llJ
(tuFoz
o
=o!f
d)€
I
I
I
I
rG
IPt<
lv,z
t=lo
lolz
lttIJtu,lqIE
lt
oFo
Fzoo
aco
ulz3\.tr
{l!P
,.. B
cr- o)uJt- 't<Fz^
YZ(,r<
3; *.5.:;61?d
gEE-"8 T
*;cEN
FSEEg !
ifEENlii;HsN
:EF;E.d
flii!,F-d
fiEFF
=o6o6E
9B 5 3t:crEEoP
i;.E;E:x.E f o
-c;ot,,tr
es;:i
E ia=EE{E:i
ef.eFI
es$e;
==
u,l
(5z
o
J
o
o
3qJ
uJ
z
6
uJ
F
UJ
:)
z
u,
att
UJtl,
u_
F
F
ulq
F
F
l
z
=
=(ON
zo6sF9
lJ' 01>!2()rJz5iHdt(JFO.jni
llJ
J
z
=oo
.- >l6utoululzo
=
u,l
.J
zo
=oo
z
tr
EqJF
3
UJ
FoJ
I
t.
l'
I
I
,)t4ul
d
CIf,<l=EC'
I
I
I
I
,;lzl
ol
3l
3l
t!lol
zl
3I
FI
I
-I
ot1!l
ccl
JI
fl
aH
I
I
I
?lolrul
CEI
JI
3
bl
zl
3lI
uJ
E
z
-rO<F
uJ<zg.IIJ F(aZo()
9Fg3
=trd6
C)
oF
Fzoo
z
t
uJ
=
,
=\,=4CXFFOz o
C)
^c-.. tJ OF --r .eHao +,E<,6EC) clrl H rOAJ-40,(5 o- x
=<cJJIL aFa F. g)
lr- v <
&. .3oc.ot!(4!-
|./| -(f
Odl!(Do o .aJur! (ul
UJ CFIzocll() Elv, ol-'E 'l<5 L r+- |:Z tF o-l
I
=Lv)lo(l)rJlJ+) qJlJ +) (/) |
R_3*l
r.,.i tc<=<cut91 tr
\-/ llao5fuF^S
954I r.u O
-F lc
!E O-;H:
E= Hodtq
;Bg;jU
=H\trlr-X
8.H qe.r<f
" t1tr
=u,-(oIoiF**
-c=
lrl
F .-r (\J
o
tA
Ir
uJF
U'oo?zo
Fo-
UJY
uJ
@
o-F
F
G
uJ_.^\.r!Go\>\
*-so
u,F
><
I
u.lFoz
tI
lfi$
E
=
uJ
tl-
LU
F
F
=Elrl
o-zo
l-
C)
:)EFazoO
4-tc.69a
,*"-t-0
'+- 51,/p/rt
b t:ct4
) n'!a
d
PF€F(qt
o1.
(-/, /
,lN
N}
o
: il
N;.\i
)r
ii
tltl
il
ii
ti
il
ti
ii
it
li
li
il
9V.taUTrclq
e
SPE
Ilu-r) FRr
IN CTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
oarc .- I t' ii'f
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
PLUMBING:
.4\ JOTINGS/STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n BOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
-. .:' r', I
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
INSPECTION:
o
SPE REOUdST
VAIL
DATE e' lf I JoB NAME
IN
/\
CTION
TOWN OF
,,it'
CALLER
MON TUES WEDREADY FOR
LOCATION:r.,,f61 I
\f_l-Li_D FRI
,- t L\-
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH T] EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOL-
t
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE - r ,'' t- JOB NAME
INSPECTION: MON
i l ..t. t,
t
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FBI t)READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
E FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
D
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
C] TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONOUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
REQUE$T
VAIL t/PERMI
DATE JOB NAME
{- *Yoa;
T NUMBEB OF PROJECT
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI ,, ,,. (lA\l)READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:WED
BU
trl
cll
trl
Itrl
tri
Ell
tr
ILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr
tr
tr
POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELE
trT
trF
trC
tr-
CTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
It APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOB
, lii]-":. ',,. \ . \INSPECTIONTOWN OF VAIL
a
.u
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
MON (- TUES)READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:WED THUR FRI
.,*.
.- -, a\.
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
O FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
T] INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH E EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
,:7,il/ CORBECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
r . ) c-r\ l\. (,
INSPECTOR ,..:,u-- .11 ' ,'" ' ''. ''--....-. -.
',/
' In'Prln|.ty/vall
DATE
0rNsftcnoN REouEst
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES WED // ,.!AA
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL tr FINAL
<---.1:fileeenovED
/ coRRECTToNS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
.-)INSPECTOR -DATE
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
INSPECTION REQUEST .
TOWN OF VAIL
AM PM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
E UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL o
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTION
a
REQUEqT . ..
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
\ -- ;,\.-_.:{, _DATE ... Y, ;i. ,' \- JOB NAME
TOWN OF VAIL
CALLER
INSPECTION:MON TUES WED THUR PMFRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
E
tr
u
tr
tr
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL.I H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
r'
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
_/\=:it,,( III APPROVED
/ CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIBED
\INSPECTOR -
,ALiill
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
g41g '-,= ..', JLp JoB NAME {-, el\.^,
clllen \ J', r
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON TUES , WED THUB FRI
^U
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
"t... r:' :-,\
REOUESTvAtL r
,\
PMAM
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
dnoucr / D.w.v.
ET ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
O SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
o
tr FINAL FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr frNAL tr FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE t.-
INSPECTOR
PERMIT NUMBER OF
alt
-) 't/U
INSPECTION1., TOWN OFj,i
1.-.,. -.( i'i) Lt
REQUEsTvAtL r
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
.L
INSPECTION:
NAME
MON
CALLER t'- / i-i i- r
TUES G'THUR FRI
l) ",t
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEI
Q rnnurruc
-\ Roor a s
tr
tr
tr
tr
D
tr
ROUGH / WATER
& SHEER GAS PIPING" PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIH
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR.:
, i- \,--, (; \v' I---(- ; /
o a
r'2
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
,-
REQUESTVAIL tt
IDAIE -1 I ). | ,ll' L JoB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES t il,;JREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
r'a j t/''1 ,) ,r''
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH .2ti r'1 t t i tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED ,./tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED't.,;
CORBECTIONS:
,/;DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
REQUESTvAtL r
I
f
tk
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
t.t.rr-l
JOB NAME
MON,
CALLER
TUES WED THUR
l-. ,
FRI
if
PM
LOCATION:
.-\
'l ,l
4
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBlNG:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W,V.
tr ROUGH /WATER
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
F{ii':9
- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
lrr.rsutolo*tr POOL / H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL E
tr
FINAL T] FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
n tr
tr/FINAL tr FINAL
\PPROVED
RRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTORDATE
I .i-"[i'r
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
r i',, t.n
DATE ' -r-".- i.\i) JOB NAME
rNsPScnoNTOWN OF
REOUESi
VAIL
I
t ,
CALLER . ,... 'r. ...
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES ,, WED . THUR FRI\. -'
.- '\AM ( PM\
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
t t'./tr HEATING
( roro"O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT O SUPPTY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
ONNOFtNs REQUESTVAIL .t
oor.
-_.F
I i: '1., JoB NAME
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
CALLER . \'.\
TUES WED THUR AM
LOCATIoN: "'r'.', I \
'r (- ---
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
'F ROUGH / wArER
F & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTORDATE
i#tro,..Fr.r trrFft iqFFirg,' tbfl;ttFFr.ul
REO
OF VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT\-:-r..,-{\..,DATE, \ \-JV \N JoB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON
LOCATION:
(.ffirm -----@ PM
CALLER
TUES WED
F \-'.,S.\\" \\\\\
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
T] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr,
tr
tr
GAS
POOL
PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
/ H, TUB
NAIL
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
U TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr coNburT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
u W^L FINAL
{et'eaoiro
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOB
OF PROJECT
I
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
REQUESTVAIL Tt
tl
{ ^ )'1t l).{<DATE itr
READY FOR INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
E FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr BOUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERD FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL o
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODSru
D TNAL tr FINAL
tr SUPPLY AIR
5l(ppaoveo tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
lt
INSPECTION REQUE$T I '
TOWN OF VAILPERMIT NUMBER
DATE
OF,PROJECT
JOB '1
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:AMTHURWED ,t i.,(
MON,
NAME
CALLER
TUES
' j' i
,. FRI ,PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL D
tro
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
El APPROVED ..
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
I
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
REQUE$TVAIL q
I ((.
tt
tr
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
oete ,,t,,'/// fi'JOB NAME ,4'tj{
a
(/)L
READY FOB
LOCATION:
INSPECTIoN: @D
CALLER
TUES
/'(, :l
WED THUR FRI
/ '/'>,, r,.r'/l/'u
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
',\.f.-,,^ '$?n el-
1.,
DATE
n.r-\1-D^i,|.l A)o\
INSPECTO
._t -e-J
l :.:
--INSPECTION REQUE$T I '
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
READY FOB INSPECTION:MON
LOCATION:
?
TOWN OF
I
VAIL
oor= ' 'tr- \[, -t:i:,\ t, JoB NAME '1 o /''
CALLER
TUES WED THUR AM
:'/ )1
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
O FRAMING
/ STEET
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
N ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
E ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
\ETAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTORDATE
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
.]'.\
DATE \, . ' i.l.r JoB NAME
)
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
I
t'
REQUE$T I
VAIL
,
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES WED THUR , -FCi)
' :- ' t' !\"\
.MON
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATEBtr FBAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING E GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr tr
trbFINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
o,ilNer tr FINAL
ryfPPRovED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
t\
DATE INSPECTOR-
oz
t
=E
UJo-
!,
+
Dr)
o
O
o
Lr)
c
u
(\
c(lF
alt
uJ
IJJu-
=
=E
uJI
O 2^tEsre.'ra
\4/o/s P d
(o
@
cf)
<t
z.
d.
=
d
ao
ur cO
F\.
J
x,=
!l<
^d,o-
==oc)JF
llJ
E
E
Iz
=6
zz
uJF
z
oz
J
6
c6
zz
Lr-
uJo
i
oFo
trFzo
o
uJz
=od
u- uJaz;tcvf rJ,l
<FZr:
YZo<
ltl 4t8 c-|yEh..4
YAlaailo ig v rf^/
1?x
leO.nr!=
Eeg:
(J
I
E9r-ls{
!rFoT-c. i
;={:ct;it
E$E\
:'l5)
6
FEff,
EEE:
EEE6c-o>
i EF;'i'; = P
c Y'- r!
-*io!B5t:
E EEB
-.O O-E
5;;E
Elaeo-(! 0--sFieoiEorE€:€
:o'vO
:EE g
E6E:
6 0'- .=5ae I
s€;E
tg=-=9 daE
Ifi E;9E o: -e5g*
- () (!:
ro
rJ)sl
tr)
r\c\l
C\I
A
oo
(o
@
coT\
|r)
@
o
(\t
c
)ottN
rOs'-
@(f,rf,
ts
=
UJ
z
I
.D
Y()
4'
z
J
9EFo
UJ
lll
z
lJc
9z
()
llJ
=
LU
uJ
z
tr
uJt()
ur
o
3IU
uJ
zo6
UJ
FItoo-
UJo
z
UJ
C)
x
F
UJol
an
uJ
UJu-
==e.
UJ
o-
J
FoF
z
J
9
F
uJJ
IJ,J
oz
co
=)
2
UJ
=
F
F
NOtrvn'lvA
;
3
l!oz
tr
&
uJ
e.
uJz.
UJ
^=-\ (}\7'Y *:-@
ftn.S
=oot
zz
io- AxtzEP o
ooZt-89r!<o*
CVIEj(\i
tt
s
L!cr
z
tr
{
cr
UJo-
F
c
(ct\
a
uJ
z
E
zotr
uJF
=UJz
u)FzlzO(,)
koo<
=Eztxxu-Uci<z
a
trz ,.
9z
tro}E
!+tttl
t]
t+
t1f-Ttl
toltoltdl
llJ
lJJ
cc
(!)
U)utzY
iF
uJIL
F
z
tr
Jl
z
Ol
I6,
FF
(tt
J
i
F
llJ
r)IE
t--
c!
!-
I!-
co
t--
oo(r
o
o
=
dFz
z
uJ
uJ
uJzaF
(r
IJJ(L
J
zo
F
o
,: ).
A
Tt-f
-'-l
I
t-l
__J
l
uJo
(rt\
z
q
g)
I
I
I
Iolzl
EI<l(!l
I
l;,;
(t
I
&,
t. /'7,..-u'4J.{E
Vt ?-.u) -J'4d.UO
// C)4a
nl)u//,t-
P4 U,2Eau/1'F 6s
t-'\ftS
'6
3
H=
oF I-UrE
=oGlu
o.
E-lrql
a) ;-; I
- \!lY>lrlguJbkzo
E
=E
uJ
ltoEqE5€8B9.lra
CE
=>:r!:-E h=R f c- o- LlJ
= >dE 8bl! H u.tE XO-t x>t q-o.irrE
uJ
oF
I--
E
=E,l!
o-zot-()
E,Fazoo
JJJolont
lat-l'Et>9ot2
i\J:tr
lrl(J
z,
Lrl
t/1
Ld
z.OFJtu:z
ui
=z
1(Dlo
EI
orlol
PIs-l
!
4
P
U7
(u
ct)
L
@@(\t
uJ
J
=
(o\og
(\l
I(o
(o
F()
JJ
T
d,
tr
+l
e
LL
U1
o
(a
an
uJ&
J
:E
rot\r\(0
I(o
i
F()
c;z.
c;(-)
Jtnz.o
a;j
E
tr
.t
(t
utiEi
--t!
<t>jttlq
zl
3l
9tFI
r)
Y'
I
N}|
IJ
J
Ld
.a
z.
co
=J
F
t!z.
=ccl
tr
z
.;
uJ
J
l!
z3o
F
C\
Ll
IF(\
clt{J
LTJ
oa
4F-1
E=J
F
UJzq
=cd
E
tr
o1
uJE
=
t!oz3IF
lrlJ
l,rJF
t.uJ
lJl
oU
(5z.
coE
=J
t--Ft!z.&.
=tr
.i
2
uJ:
ttoz
3l9 =E
o2
dItl
J
l!
z
3oF
UJ
uJF
uJz
=o
Fo
uJtr
E
-.r O<FE()uJ<zEL!Ftrr Z
o
J
(J
F
C)
uJ
IJtt
j
a
J
E2?
E3fFd5()
i3:IF7<)4<
-= ?t
Y,Z
=g
E
tYir
IIJ
-II,r- 1-Oz<oo!2
-.
z,^ozecoo
=z=l=.L L!
ifio()=
=83_': ?\ J-
=Hg
P<P<r"-1rxt_zjLl
t4t4t4l>< |:rl l><
!
rFo
1
s
\
x
s)
{
f\
L...
\>
t;tttl
l"l
l: IIrll\ |l\lt-l
lhltl
X
t\
\
a
\
,
")
o0
X
\
:
\)
\s\
F
T
U)
uJ
uJu-
tr
=
UJ
I
I
\91x
*
I
Go
Frhz
=o
z
2
I
i
'.$l
N
)\5
I
-rl/
ll
.$l
N
\r*
o
uJF
z
z
J
f
€
=zo
;- o c ll+
B;E;E \l=
F e Rt= s.{19
EE E:N\F
€ ;E g:al \lr
:iEiEl$lF;i:iedlr
isii*{g;ei;;;= IEEa-ii-! l<n<o=-o"(o X o-!.o=E 9Ec O-.! ":EEP3"(/'.eOO
:E.E H?,
EEEg=-a€r;
c=o(/)triei:€
-Q ? =EJ3 u >.=do (5= - q)c - !+- >r{5:i
s{:F9
iE$eE
0
(,
Vi
\^
$
s
N
N
N
o
N
!
0
r\'$
oI
\t
t/:-
s
so
6
cj
0
0
\\
s(
s
Ql
cc\
\-v
kq
trb\
d
.I
(F
t'
u,l'T-?
F
uJ
z
(o
YouJ
oz
J
9
()t!
tr
z
El
)
z
c)
uJ
E
|l,l
,.-z
tr
UJ(r
UJE
E
3g
z
-rn
lrJ
o
uJ
z
x
F
ul
CNf
!
U'
IIJ
uJt!
L
uJ\
J
F
z
J
9
ul
uJ
E)
=f
2
l!
=
J(
l--
ro|-
NO[Vn']VA
;d-\o\l\eZN
O\
ba
LUzL!
q9 !,--9
=C)61
zz
|:.o. EXfEg o
60z>-
a)zl!<
si*dFOdoi
z
9
g
q
I
E0
UJ
F
ol
o'
R
Nr-
-ll0rila
IX-J<ltzllo
F
ll<
il^il-llzotr<
llF
ll-
lt^il;il:l
oazlz
tr
lt!z
z
3o
u,
uJ
tr
oz
F
z
I
6I
ll+
ll,+
NI
i"l
t9l
lll
fJJ
U'atrtz
it-
Jl
U)z
\
i
:
|:--itl{\
l
/\\s\
N
:
N\
\_-$
\
o
3
.. >louJ-oululzo
=
lu
z
O(.)
<q
Jl<l
trI
zl
zl
[-
z
F
J
d}
z
c
r.cr
tfr
)
\
JJ
3
!t
u.
N
E16 tn
t!.F C OCL-o- q- +,(5 O-.F .E
= .gv Erl]
F--{ .r O) O-
tr_ v C X.- 0Jo..=
u- (4 !- .P(4-O O,o<rJl (uo-oo{-rE
LU -(' (u OLrl gr (J
CJEov) o=- E u+r
(5 L(F -
z. tt o 6
=\tn=O O .t'-r 'rJ+J(U=J {-' !,.t .tr
O C.' L!- J (\.t -('
oF
F
(r
ut
o-
tJ-o:
o
I
TJ-^^F '-{ c!
gur
:^F\,zox
.l
LLI
tt)
E.
=
x
LJJ.r
F
d.
LlJ
=
F
J
J
u-
rlJ
t /',
LrJ
c,
o
6'
=
oIJ
o
z
ze
>z
. o-\ l!
EN!Fl
>l
Fl ,.=E
3I
=EEHl =96=l -i 'i L!ik q d.>
NNN
I
I
\L
F\lJ\)
\a
F
uJF
I(J
tljz3
UJ
z
I.\|.
\9
I
N+-
i
J
F
)
\|
.J)
U
\,1
L'\D
\
>
\
I
\\
$
I
I
I
I
ctl
=.1olurl
5l
gl
ttlol
FI
{
s\
$e
v
tr(
\s
l-
b
I
t\
rE
OI
=.1
OI
uJl
:l
<l>l
:l
9l
N
N\,\
'4
I
t\
\\
\l
I
ol-l
ol
uJl
5l
al>l
bl
zl
3l
9IFI
$\
I^
j
I
I.-r\
0\
=.1ot
uJ I
1l
<l>l
ltlol
zl
3lolFI
I
^l:l
l,uJrclJl
<l>l
lIIol
Zl ..t3t fol uJFI F
*)
(,z
=t!
e.hgX
(.,z
=IOuJ
F()
z
o
>Y
>a]F-JZo-O
<o(JF;s
XF
-tN z
-ovo
<F(r(JuJ<
.aZo
--A-\\., \:s\'\*{'&/ \L\_\ \._t3.f\.
\qt** \*,, \b\
Cdi;. 0rder
Date:Sept. 23, 1986
Art lielton
I-.ocation; 1034 Horne circle, Vai1, CO
I, Art Kelton, understanci that because of the Lack of hea.ci
clearance, and the snovr ancl ra1n, that r,1111 fall over the new roof
of the kitchen of mv nev,'ad(rition yri11 rrnottr be nsed as a sun deck,
or i,orch of any kinci. This flat roof rr'111 remai.n as a roof. f will
nor+, also ellrninate ihe I uard raj-l as sh o1,,rr on the approved plans
by the tov/n of Vail Buildinl:, De;.rt; since thls a roof and not a porch.
The thirty two inch, bv seventy tvro inch glass wlndow, off the
rriaster ba.th to the fla.t roof }'rl 11 us;e as a flre egress, and build-
ing malntance only. I hold no claims of any liabilittes from any
kind of a-ccident tha.t mav occur in the future totr'ards the Torvn of
Ve-1l, or V.G, Cons. Co., Inc, for making; thls change frort porch to
roof.
I(eL ton
<\{st".
oo
,l r L' tr ,
Owner, Address and Phone: flr t I''. r a *r w
(ra_t,
Profecl Appllcatlon
Project Nsme:
Project D€scription:
Contact Person and
Architecl. Address and Phone:
Comments:
Design Revlew Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Staff Approval
.,*H:- :.,
Projecl Name:
il Project Apptication Ot
\:,\i... \rr \, .*
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Descriplion: Lot Block
Comm€nls:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL--i--.--:::::-:=-DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
E Statt Approval
oo
Zoning Check
Kelton Additiortlt zno
Doto: Lot_1._-Block 6, Voil Villoge Zfh Filing
Zone; Prinory/ Secondory Residentiol
18.13.050 Lot Areo ond Site Dimensionr
oo
6 Morch, 1979
FuCr1 AF( fa,--tO=l
Actuol
Site is copoble
18. 13.060 Selbocks
Areo:
Frontoge:
of encloing 80'
Front Setbock:
Side Setbock:
Reor Setbock:
18. 13.070 Distonce Between Buildings
Minimum 20' between
dwe lling on odioining
r8. 13.075
r8. 13.090
18. t3.080
dwelling on one sile ond
site. O.K.
Minimum
15,@0 sq.fl.
30'
squore
Minimum
11,986.01 sq.ft.
76.23 ',
Actuo I
33'
16.9'
10.5'
20'
l5'
15,
Height
30' moximum height; Actuol
Site Coveroge
Moximum 20o/o of site = 21397.2 sq.ft.
Actuol = 1,518.5 sq.ft.
Density Cotol
GRFA moximum 25o/o of siie = 2,996.5 sq.ft.
Actuol = lr 98l .4 sq .ft.
One of the two units not to exceed l/3 of ollowed
GRFA = 998.8 sq . ft.
Actuol = 4f,4.2 sq. ft.
Allowed Addition = 2,996.5 - 1,981.4 = l,015.l sq.ft.
GRFA
Af fowed Addition to Site Coveroge = 2,fV7TTffi|S -
878 .7 s9. ft .
oa oo
'Gordon R.Pierce . Architect . A.I.A.
List of Materials
NAME OF PROJECT AKf l€.tj-au uotpe nwtrnoxt
LEGAL DESCRTPTTON: r-,Or .5 StOCx 6 FrLrNG us,tt- utt-tzt+ 7+l F q*tG
DESCRIPTION oF PROJECT soo Fxt|+<y t ''-tN/,e &c_s xtp 4a . 4.
by
be
The
the
following information is required for submittal
Design Review Board before a final approval can
Type of Material
the applicant to
given:
ColorA. BUILDING MATERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffi ts
window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
FJues
Flastr i ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
1FT a .* <f-< Tr nra.lzta ettafl-
ntw.<ep @ prrt T? n>tr'. FttFG
f,,F n*f (cnhn 1Z- tttttZ,, n.'.ertt
F4crT pNrL
I
tO l-.E'rZtr d.tba'Z'
14ETA.L
1000 South Frontage Road West. Vail, Colorado 81657'303/476-6176
oo oo
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone:
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
SHRUBS
Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size
SQUARE FOOTAGEGROUND
covERs
oo
soD
SEED
oo
SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR
METHOD OF
EROSION
CONTROL
C. OTHER
etc. )
oo oo
LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls' fences' swimning pools,
Please specify.
OI oti 0iir - (litCK
for
Lega I
0vJ0€F
Descr i p ti gn :Lot
Zone District
lot Size
Hei ght
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks:
Front
Sides
Rear
l'ia ter Course
S'i te Coverage
L andscapi ng
t'arl( l ng
Credi ts :
Garage
l-'lechani cal
Ai rl ock
Stora ge
Solar Heat
Stora ge
Dri ve: Slope Permitted
Invi ronmen ia l,/Fla za rds :
Proposed Use
Al I or.red
( 30) (33)
20,
15'
15'
(30)(so)
lJ,r"+^X
Proposed
?C>'
zY'(7
2o//
/r
3=l\k/
\O:
-xlAJs)-{
3y
-s-'o
///,+
/-;
-4b
3oo) (6oo)
eoo) ( 120o)
(so)(ioo)
(2s) (so)
2oo) (4oo)
Slope Actual
Aval a nche
F'l ood P'l a i n
Sl ope
sFR, R, R P/S 7011E DISTRICIS
4, t .YL, 5 Brock Ce Filine l)U , 't'--'
Archi irt G-?.R^-*
Corn:nts:
hpproved/ D) sa pproved10nt n
\l
Ca te: <-\ r g[ 8S-
fg'd4 (u
a^o
$ i*lt
l- t*| zrorX tE | -,''iiF :=l:g
iB rEl;e
l!J
uJo
=I
t!
t!
u,l
z
isiEi
q=#ov(sPO-Eo-E or9
:sEgl
-G
=zzs-o ootr ^ 62q 5 >eF 9 OE.toEz>-ooo?ezx
l!<9q ?uJ ti-R 2
HNO
^.'St \t t\>t\g-yj;+-
ftn,{
=cool
-J:r
-t
1
oz
t
=l- -tI I I.IJ@ lo-@lo?rzo
F(L
IJJY
ulo
oF
ts
ct
IrJo
tto
> (Y)o-@
f-) \-xo
l\,r(o
Hur
2E
z
'n9
=<mo2z
JOa! rJ-
if;=dd=
=:
llJ
6;l!E:E<4f60toB9Eir
'Ef
F-Jr-:ui:-E h=E :*: =o-i 8rI itnE XO-t x>t q-o-i!tr
UJ
o
---
F
=E,
lrJo-zoF()f
E,Fazoo
trtrn
+JN
(l,
|tt
(o
d
Fo
lJ.l(Jz,Ldo
anIJd.
z
F.J
LJJsz
uJ
z
co
-)
!
+)l-
uJ
z
>l
t!l
lrj(n
z,
a/,
=
=cl!
=.1OI
IJJI
5l
;-l
u-l
zl
FI
=.1(rl
uJl
5l
al>l
rl.lol
zl
3l
PI
=.1(5l
tlJl
1l
sl
EIol
zl
fl
I
I
I
I
I
dl
=.1olutl
5l
<l>l
t!lol
il g
ol ulFI F
uJF
E
-rO<F(r()ur<ZE
IJJ F(rzoo
Fo
tFzoo
)
E
uJ
E
E
>Y
=f4ZrJ- o
o
zo
C)
z.
To
uJ
=
t-&irg
\JZ
<c)an
-rt 3 atrnn
\
I
I
;l
I
oz
E
=so-
tc
€e
5
U'ul
UJl!
F
=
UJ
TIJF
o
J
tr!r-ooz
6
5ct
uJ
F
F
z
=
zz
tltl
t{lNI r'l
lvl
t^l
I lsI sl .\-
I t-\
ld*l5\I Z r'.t
lZslg'l5lol"d\
IE?lzto IIN
tr
i
o
1L
oFO
lL,z3otr
tL tll6z;:Gv:r ul
<FZn9z(/J<
atq,
A
E
c)i
o
c(!
o
o
E
d)
E
=cl
(D
o
'.9
c,
atq)
Eo
att
6
N
t
F
o
o)
=
ooo(6
o
f
o
an
.9
-c
=
C'
o
'(E
'=9(,'
g3E
c^ .2 *'=xy9;:b=E
c-o
.g: ;-do
=pF; >=
c96
d5]_= >.9 q;
*oo
e;9F5;.=- (E
o(E o-cL= -oE oqr- clr-;E
-(l'C
:t,)'"
t E.oo)$:l -:XEKE
+vC
+ E-co.g-OrdrCE L=oi3
!6>.
-x;EHp s>Y z.io;
9r E- or
ib;'
-o(g
Nv)
q
\^
\
9
\I I
t
a
i(J
\
(^
N
l.;
N
F
=g
ut
o-
z
Y
C)
UJroz
J
-F
uJ)
UJ
z6
=
J
z
I
IIJ
=
UJ
uJ
z
tr
E
(E
o
az
o6
=g
lrlEz('6llJ
F6
UJ
z
(lJ
x
F
ul
<n
an
UJ
uJu-
E
t
UJ
o-
J
F
F
z
!l(D
o
F
qJ
llJ
z
J
J
z
o
LU
NOrlvnrv^
C
x
BZZe-
i o- 9<Xr>YE I of,
ooEZ>-()z1 ir ttt6> xt!<oq dH5 x:R 2
rN(,
\6"1-9
= ll, cn
l.l
H
H
z9F
l
{IL
CE
ulo-
F
\
,R
\n)
gJ
z
Eo
z
9F
g.
ul,-
B
UJz
'ltttl
=zf,zOotrU<Oo<
=HRtr6o<z
F.z ,.
Oz
":F
d(9i6
UJl
J
uJzY
iF
ut
F
z
9
F
J
l
z
Ii
N
\
l-"11
?l:ltlulI
I
I
I
l"
stl Y
K
R
I.lcol<uJ|^
ula
LUFo-lL<ioH
Fl
F
Jl
-l
zl
zl
.. >l
UJolrl
UJz
lnF
{u
z
E
o
oz
tr
J
z
IL o
M
c\
N
t--l
?
-I
J
f
UJF
o
utFo
oa
z
FoulY
utdl
oFt
(r
11,
o-
u-o
o-oo
I
UJFoz
z
.rPzz(Do
=z
CL r.r-
)dfi(,()=
=e*i6il>
F
ut
o-
u-o.r' UJE()
E<
ooEge9sc
CE
E-tt-
=lr|:-5 E=o dE: >o-Iorr-
=()/^lE ricxcr x>.!::lF
o-!tr
llJ
E
-rE
F
=E,l!
o-zo
Fo3
oaFazo
C)
trDu
-
D!
r
Ir
frtdco-il
lR-tE
t;F-.i
JlL
\)\<
\Qt-
--l
SJ
><
uJ
z
o'-I
-+-
;X
Ii!t'-r-iI
1u.l
=4
crg
\
o
c_l\\
vlUIul
dctn{
=
R
($
$
)
t-lS
F =lii
oItE
o-
Fo
\J\4
Q
I
-F
\4
-J.<
=d
--1
Y
=.)
ull
1l
?l>l
tilol
zl
3l
FI
a
I
"\lf-'$-
!
t\5c(")
ul
tiJF =6
olzl
sl
5l
<l>lalol
zl
3l
FI
€
tr
oz
otr,
?
r!q
z139
uJ-)
u,tF
=g
I
I
I
.lzl
(,l
ull
5l
?l>l
r|-lol
zl
BlolFI
=tr
I
I
I
I
I
2l
sl
5l
<l>l
l!lol
3l col u,FIF
Ll.Jz
=.o
I
F-
ulL'r
E
--,r O<Fftour<zt
I."U F.n Z.oo
t9
iE4'-l
(,c)zt-
=<1t
]F)z
C)
<FYFz()z<+c
iz
=g
trirg
\JZ
)<O<5 g.
foKDN
c\\S
\G-
o
IJJ5o trd il+
f ;r
,,{ i}I$b-S -... 5
{
ut
r
T
Fz
u
t-(\l
t
--st
o
N
A
SHlt=+!iri
-kc(,o-O )
< l. : z Fr;;'!
Hi;:-frUq::?:
;<azo
^zzA)3::g;
<oclz:;iEii5e6'iFge:3lFr<cO> -(/)<o*-qrl.=<
d<'J
llJ
F
z
z
UJF
E
F
EFoz
o
(,zz
a
uJ
uJu-
F
=ul(L U'
UJllr
lJ-
E
=E
uJ
o-
J
F
F
=
E.luc
z
dJ
CO
z
Jo-
E
o6
3!utut
z
6
uJ
UJtuu.
i
o
z
U''
.a
LUF
B
(,ozz
s9AH6 f
-26*'rP=slfaP 3 FPdBfiEo9@E'!Z=
FO? * ,i
= I IHff
z " E ; "d c*r= 955o9(,oEz(J
z3z
-k
E z
F
az
UJ
E.
2Z
ho- AX=EP o
aOz>-OO<)zE<oq
o-H-x
;c.j
z
trq
Eoo
UJ
zo
e
t
(L
UJt
z
E
z
F
uJ
J
=uJz
(.t)
<n
LUzY
iF
1,,
-J=<r!x=o
JF=
!J
al
IIJI
ol
1t
<(l
>l
al
uJl
ol
1l
al
=l
ut
oo
a
aa
u,.l
o
=
ol
jl
r(l
=l
I
Il*
l.
I
I
,)atlu{q
ctq
:i<l =E()
s\
.-.>
oz
Jtr EoF
EFz
()
z
T()
IIJ
t-G. ir
=i-E Fo2
>Y
=<zt]FJZ
LLO
-.r O<F(r()uJ<zE
I-U F
FO
IJJt'rJ<oaQ56
togto
olz.
oz
ts
=&Iuo
I
oz
Fo
LlJ-)oGo-
tlj
F
o
zoz
rn !lze
. =z\.xN!trr-l
=l r
Fl "dgHl =f;f^l =i--()
=l
;;E
Eo
Ecto
6'
G'!
.E
t
E
EoC'
o
tro
E
otlo!
F
=E
UJ
o-zo
Fc)fEl-azoo
:
-E !uD
{nq5tpermitNo.
ii fj 0 3 3
VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT lnrn
METER INSTALLATION PERMIT
METER TO BE INSTALLEO BY LICENSEO PLUMBEB WITH TOWN OF VAIL.
NAME OF JOB Art Kelton resi rienr:e
ADDRESSAND/ORLEGALDESCRgpIgg;{ 1034 HornSilver ,/ Lot 4 , V.V. 8th
PLUMBING CONTRACTOR Burnett Plumbino Ltc. No.P-IO O
Metersize 3./ 4"Met€r Mak€
M€terNumber #I09142 BittthisAmounttoptumb€r
e/L3/78Dsto l89ued
CALL FOR PHYSICAL ANO METER INSPECTION WHEN INSTALLED 476-5613 EXT. 230
,t
t\ \u
t-/./1 ./t / //'a '.' \ Lr" kt -
Vail Water & Sanitation District
Bldg. D€pt. - Whit6; - Wat6r &Sanitation -Canary; - Contrector - Pink; - Accounting- Gold6nrod
lh. rth|..t/va'l
/1
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMI1
TI{E TOWN OF VAIL
{Appticant fill in tlria gcctloa only)
addtcEs_Ho,n=rfh<e Ct ALUS
Applicetion 7 -79-Cg
Addreos
Addregs b-city \)AiL Tel.
Name f1-r-rLr=Trr L-o
Addrccs
city DENVEQ- - Tel. No.
kt
A
Bo
srJ
h
BUILDING INTORMATIOI!
NewJ A
Altcration Rcpaire
Type of ocffacylg639p5s!
(All parte of buildtn?l e.'='t"TA l-
r'
sUII-,orNc ouMEr.{sq.rys.E' \r l&rlllr!\, r/aavra, rt e& '!v I
Total floor area_( sq ft)-."o>Q-
No of gtories a Ha:
:
-i
No. of roome;/-No. batheJ
|,
rnt.
c!o
No. of water cloeetg
't'r,l'; ''
\7
-i.No. of Familier 3
(Circlc correcr[ clegs - ,(--\Typc of congtruction I. II. III. I V (}/-
Occupancy group A. B. C. D. E. F. C(Qf. f.
(Pe
Approval by plenning and architectural control committcc to obtain building
pcrmit.
Datc Signeturc
BUILDING INSPECTION
Certificate of occupaacy & compllencc
I-lUII,DING PIiRMIT
\.'ai1, Coloracio
l )r. t'n.:1
I't'rrtti:r:;irttt 1. lr t' r r'lry 11r:r nte'r'l
r at. _sfi4i_41__ t,' -6!*
/ui ',t n _,.n /et S j/aa.f 61 4,A/.Ur
' rlclr'r,:,,' /at r. t/n fe €ri^c,/c
ln :1c'<:ordatrcc lvillr tlre provis ions set f orth by the Vail ..,r rchitectrrtal Conllol
(,t>trt'irittt'c, srrl>]t-ct to tlrc lules arrcl legrri.ations as sr:t Ior:th in tirer VajiV:llar{r,
l)rrr1 r't lir.t Clt'ivr'r.t;tt-ti:s, :tti<l in ( ()n:Ipliancc "vith the I964 l-inifr>rm Plrilrlrng (,'trit.
j 1,1,, r'i ( i ,itr.t trtr'lt,r,t -r G r r'rr r t)/-/
'
r I 1-r t. rl ,,t c cl
Va it I-l uilrLirr,t Inspect
to
, .(a.bc, /
INSt'i C'r'l.i.t )J RI: CC RI)
(1.,'or L)c1:a rl.r'rcrttal use On)y)
I N SI'1]l)l)Il()v..\ .i..
I':
'ii
/l
| ,.,t,,,,,,;
t.,_IIN
lt ()l
irl
.:>
:);I'' IN ,' I,
Irotr(;l I
FIN.']
"rwiB
ng wj
wi th
1967 edi ti on.
I am in the process now of
and they wi 11 be furni shi ng
drawi ngs.
worki
you
Yours very tru'ly,
Executi ve
Young
Vi ce Pres i dent
vail/ colorado BrasT
August 26, 1969
Charles G. Bynum, P. E.
Vai'l , Co'lorado 8'1657
Dear Mr. Bynum:
With reference to my home under construction herejn Vail, this house has been designed and will be
bui I t i n accordance wi th the Uni forn Bui l di ng Code '
th the plumbers
the necessary
July 28, 1969
IJarrisou- I( irnlrlc, Dccigacrr
?785 North Specr R!vd.Derver. Colorrdo
Dear Sirs:
Re: Ycung Reclde
,, _.. .-.- -- ]
Followlng
l.
,
1
4.
{rre comments on
l ypical wall sdction
Need
flditlon.
al
aubjccy'glanr:
chow reintorccmcntr.
lc not lndicated.
and pl bing planr.
thet ltrc houar wlll be built tn'e Unlform Buildtng Code, lg6?
Since
TH['':
;
il
I
:l
,li ,I
,, i
tl
.I
I
i
i
ll
I
.i
Charlen G. Rynum, r'. Ji .Ruildlng Offtcial
CGB/car
Sest
n:;ii!Iq
cc: J. Robtrt young, Vell. GO