HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 BLOCK 1 LOT 9 PART 1 LEGALTOIiIN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 8L657
970-479-2L38
Description:
INTERIOR REMODEL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMI]NITY DEVELOPMENT
(af| Ate,r
l/ ftt A
'JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: 800-0049
Status...: ISSITEDApplied..: 04/05/2oooIssued...: 04/24/2000
Ex;rires . .: Lo/2L/2a00
Phone: 970-949-1800
Phone: 970-949-1800
TOViComm. Dev.
NOTE: THIS PERMIT
ADD/ALT SFR
MUST BE POSTED ON
BUILD PERMIT
.lob Address:
LocaE,ion. . . :Parcel No. .:Project No.:
705 FORBST RD
2LOL-072-LL-022
PR.Jo0-0042
APPLIEATiIT BECK & ASSOCIATES, INT
P O BOX 4030,'VArL CO 81658
CONTRAETOR BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC
P O BOX 4030, VArL CO 81558OWNER ILLIG ELIFF
1-1-504 Paurnee Circle, Leawood KS 66211
FoR sEcoNDARy irNrr.No ExrERroR clean-up Deposit Refund
Singte Family Residenc€Prirl\ied
Type V Non-Rated ,. r
Add Sq Ft: L;* '-;
FireDlace Information: ReBtrictsed: YEs *of eaB Appliarlce6:*of ea6 Logs:*of wood/Palleg:
FEE SUI,IMARY
TOTAT, FBES----- 3,904.00 BAI,ANCE DUE---- .OO
It,EM: O51OO BUILDING DEPARTIIEIIT DCPE: BUILDING DiViSiON:o4/L3/2000 KATITY Action: NoTE Routsed Eo ch-arlie
04./L4./2OOO CIIARIIE ACTiON: APPR CIIARLIE DAVIS
ie am;' 05460 -Fr,arttiNg DSFARTMSNT DepE : PT,ANNTNG Division:04/L3/2000 KATITY Action: NOTE RouE,ed to Allison
04'/1-4'/2000 AoeHs Action: APPR inEerior & mechdoor onlyiEam;'05coo--Frnr DEeARTMEDTi Dept: FrRE ' Division:
04/1-3/2000 KATIIY Action: APPR N/Artam:',05500 PuBLrc woRKs Detrt: PUB WORK Division:04/.t3/2000 KATITY Actsion: NOTE Sitse/Staging Eo LeonardO4'/I8'/2000 LSANDOVA Act.ion: APPR APPROVED-
;.;
"
;;. ;. ;;
"
;; ;;;;' ; ;;;; ;;;;;;;. ;;.;;;
DECI,ARATIONS
I her€by ackno$1edge tshag I have lead ghi6 applicatsion, filled ouf in fulI tshe informalion required, colrp1etsed an
plan, and Btafe that all the informacion provided as required is corrcct, I agree to comply wilh lhc infornation
to comply with aLl Tolrn ordinances and Etate la!,s, and to build Ehi6 6Erucgure according to the Town's zoning and
code6, deBign review approwed, Uniform Building code and other ordinancrB of lhe Tovrn applicablc thef,ebo.
Occupancy: R3
T)pe Construction: V N
Valuation:400, 000
4J!,--.
Building----->
Plan Check- - - >
Inveatigagion>
will call---->
Reaeuarart Plan Review- - >
RecreaEion Fee------ ---->
clean-Up Dcpo6it- - -- -- - - >
Tocal calculaled Feee- - - >
AddiCional FeeB-----____>
ToCal Perurit Fee-------_>
Paymenta--____-
1 , 940 .00
!,26L -OO
.00
3.OO
.00 3 . 904 .00
.00
3,904 .0O
3,904.00
DRB F6e-------- 200.00
.00
500.00
accurate plot
and plot plan,
eubdivieion
g:00 ll.l 5 :00 PMREQUESTS FOR TNSPECTTONS SHATIJ BE MADB T,WENTY-FOUR HOURS rN ADVANCE BY TETJEPHONE AT'.419-2L3e O) AT OUR OFFICE FROi'l
Scnd Cl.an-ltp Deposit To: BECK AND ASSOC O sreNATuRE ", #nn oR coNTRAsroR FoR HrusEr,F AlrD oriNER
Page 2********************************************************************************
CONDITIONSPermit #: 800-0049 as of 04/24/OO Status---: ISSIIED********************************************************************************
PermiE Tlpe: ADD/ALT SFR BUrLD PERMTT Applied--: 04/06/2000
Applicant--: BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC Issued---: 04/24/2000
970-949-1-800 To $qrire z LO/2L/2OOO
ilob Address: 706 FoREST RD
LocaEion- - - :
Parcel No-- : 2LOL-O72-LL-O22
Description:
INfERIOR REMODEL FOR SECONDARY I]NIT,NO EXTER]OR
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COnditiOng * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
]-. FTELD INSPEETIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.
2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BBDROOMS AIiID BVBRY STORY
AS PER SEC.31"0.6.1 0F T'rrE 1997 I,BC.3. THIS APPROVAL IS FOR TNTERIOR WORK ONLY.
MAKE NOTE OF CORREETIONS ON PI,ANS
_
*******lt:r****t***l***t*****************r*****!t**********i*t*t***
TOIIN OF VAIL, COIJORADO Statenmt
**l*************t*********r*+**t**********!r**t**,1********,1******
gtaternnt Number: REC-0619 Amount :3,854.0O 04/24/OO !3 1]-7
Pa)ment lrtethod: CK Notation: *4279IBECK & ASS Init: LC
Permit No: 800-0049 Type: A-BUILD ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PE
Parcel No: 2101- 072 -lL-O22
Site Addrees: 705 FOREST RD
This Payment
Total Fees:
3,854, O0 Total ALL PmtB:
Balance :
t***lt**t***ti*tt*tt***a**tA*t*t**t********at***i:llll*****.1*****
Account. Code Deecription
BP OO1OOOO31111OO BUILDING PERMIT FEES
DR O01OOO031122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES
PF OO1OOOO31123OO PLAN CHECK FEES
AD Dz-DEPOS CLEANUP DEPOSITS
WC OO1OOOO3112SOO WILII CAIJIJ INSPECTTON FBE
3,904.0O
3, 904 . O0
.oo
Amount
1, 940 . 0O
150.00
1,251.00
500.00
3.OO
Foz.a
'Foz
'oOE
F-2
doFOoFIF
Fl(/)zo
;;
!1
=Fo
E
o
F,
Fi
F
lrl
U
UF
o
,1
o
a1
FIE
Era
o
FI
o
oo
O lrla
QFzz
FTE
tsr
FFIzzElb:oFE
a
az
Fr=
I
FIF/2
ooA:
FI
F
F
2
F
EO
zFl
t rtlo oFrF qo(n do
UU
F
p
U
o
F
d
2
q
FI
o
;
E>
E={.
!lo3
?YYFP
;=: :1 Jg;;i EH
6.= l ! 3 =6'.9 Y : E:b: > ! h:s(/)Q,u:xo
sba=E lS.= o'3 L e.=
2 a -ai. ??"c -9 '; :: ; q
: :': *.! :
iu3;bs
3Ei.34!# hg EBicc9i3xPF:f f ;
=lQ'=-c,=I X >!- v
=
5 g E Eb-oE p !i: qigEE;.E- g ar;l .!{
'ij= HE F;5E:H*:
_ldI
YI
.l
o
E
z
z
.r'1
U
li
-
r)
a"
L
c.)fv.
;l
<D
u
>\\J
U
0)'a
r..q
(n
0.)
5
I
I
I
.,1
liI{/l
9i vl:I xllul'I
ai r \l
'0, 3 'El
.:9 |>\ tr rJ<l
-clE 6,1T;. EJI /- t-l-o. : ;ilat ! \JJl
?l - ,-, IE.= 6b tl
: >,.: tl;= 3 .Hl!'j ! .=l
v @.8 Jlb5E n, <l.E€E \lr6i El
= ". ., -rl< x!; xl;'- ", vl
=_e1 Hlx:: xl
d ='J 6'lg.c : Yl
/ <t'E 6JlOF! EI6ri .61
:CE PI
*-\)9.xl
9I: =lh |,;5 I
!.:= I'=82
IIee' I
op= I
: ., tr 6i1;E} .F:.i o Yia
X-P \J
:t\!i|Eo x6r'o .Y'-c9 !.e€ E .i
o ^nG tl
d=-=\r),ei'p :==;---Eb3 Eril.i E'i o,)+1" (! tr
-2>tr-(E
HUz
(
P{
DUUo
F{o
HH
14
UH
fr{H
HfrHU
\
o l.\
db I:E{9(^
-=S
F< tJ
:-]s
LJ-{
=,
=F:--{
d'
()
l.)
t-
U
\
€'
(
bO
\
tt)q)
tJt
OJl-
(E
l-D;agp-22-9Ef 14.31 FROM. TOV- COM-DEV-DEPT. I D,97a4?92452 PAGE
ff rowN oF varu OrusrRucroN pERMrr npptamoN F.RM
'trt II{FoR.,\IATIoN MUsr BE coMpLETE oR TaE AppLIc.4,TIoN wrLL BE REIECTED
t/7
Contact the Eagle Courfi Assessors Qffice at 97632E-ail0 for Parel#
Parcetf ?)cl A 1-?-ll_9.*-2-
Darc: 2-L Permit #
lobName:
Arcfiitect:eaaress:1?C
'-l -, '
PP.loo .004.L
E Oo - oo4Q
Vri,:f
*Ty 6fl u)
R€f:ir
ta\ | ,1 A/' l Ipro6 ,\t ; z+<l I llcV.-l
al.. - n .'\ / '1 .1, t
S -P +oa ,cC<' -.anl
inrcnbr
Nunber and Tlpe of Fireplaccs: @s Appliatccs
Work Class: New ( )
Numbcr of Dwelling Units:
Town of Vail Regisradoa No-
OTHEK
TOTAL
Tswn of Vail Regisaion No-
AddrEss:
Phooc #
Address: .&' A,'r- ttw'; Xa,. . ft; \(,;?+;
Pno',e* (t1u ) :i49 ' ttLaC
Ad&ess: LA\IWX2/' l 't I
Mcchanicel contrecrnr: L. n LxPr p1€c ta
t ,') /> /)
Town ofVail RcgiscrationNo. / O"/- f Phone #
FOR OFFICE I,.|SE
BUILDING:
SIGI.IATURE:
ZONING:
1, V p-e,;='t Atn c1,?.-i1,Lt Ajzi1obAddrcss; ?o L, VvaxFkyesl- V-ra,!l
Buildhg( )Plumbing ( )Elcsricai ( )Mccfrarical ( )
t,ri
Ohcr t4 )utf-.u''t t', v-
'4rkgal DcscriEiorr Lot_: Block I \;til Vrt[ci (J'r*nooo',
ownersName; CI,+Y gllr r;Address: lO
Description of Job:I c,v.a.-nl t)|tb2-u-
lu,.
Numberof AccommodationUnirs: trl i X
Gas lngs \l'ood/Pcllct
VALUATIONS
,l ..^t..) n(,(,BUII,DING: g T't?)., v"'ELECTRICALT g' 'T lV, Cctg
PLIJMBING$ L'tk,CJ,t MECIIAMCaL$ '? ltCjc
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
tra -,}=
Electrical Contrrton
LL
SIGNATURE
Ai-,;- 1t rj /rll.Jtl
.MAR-22-99 14 '31 FROM , TOV-CO EV-DEPT.1D ' 5"64752452
ALL CONTRACTORS CLIRRENTLY RECISTERED WTn] THE TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBUC WORKS A}lD COI/f,\4UNITY DE\ELOPEMENT
JA}\'[JARY 1. t999
CONSTRUCTION PARKNG AND IVTATERIAL STORACiE
Rcad ad adoowledged by:
M-D
o
PAGE 2/?
.I LJ:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBIECT:
CODE *2-10: DEFOSITS ON PIIBLIC WAYS PROEIBITEI)
A- Unlawtrrl deposits: Subjccr ro subsection C thereo{ it is uulas'fuI for any person to lincr,
t-ack or deposrq or causc to be lifiered, tracked or deposired, sand, grave! rockg nud, di4
snow, ice, or anv cnher debris or marerial upon any sueet, sidevral( alley or public placg or
any ponion thereof.
B. Notice; Abatqne.lt: The Dircctor of hrblic works may nc*ifr and rqquire any persou who
violares or causes another to violale the provision of subsection A hered or who bas in the
Dire<tor's enploymcnt a person wbo violaes or causcs another' o violate rhe same' top
remove zuch salrd gravel, rocks, mu4 dirt, suow, ice or auy other dcbris or material within
uency four (24) horus after receipt of said notice by rhe Direqor of hrblic Worts. In the
wed the pcrsou so nqtified does n<r comply with the notice within tbe period oftime herein
specified the Director of Public Works, or other authqrized aged rvty c:ruse any sqch sand,gnvel, rocks, mud, did, sow, ice, debris or any otber rnaterial to bc removed from any street
or allcy atthe erycnsc of the notified.
C. Exceptions: The pro'isioru ofsqb,sestion A hereof sball not be appiicable:l. Witlia &e immediate area of any corrsttction, mairdeoance or repair project of any
sueet or allery or of any q13161 rllpin, sewer main, etecrricity line, gas line, Glcphone line
or ary aPPurt€Iiutce tieretp:
2- To deposits of sand, dirt or marerials necessary for tbe protection of dre public safcty; and
- 3- To public areas desig."te6 6ot gr" &unping or depositing ofsaid marerials.D- Slmnons; Peoalry: As an alternative to the nodce for ranoral provided in slbse$ion B
abovq any
pcrscm who violates or causes anotLer to violarc the sarng may be issued a summons !o
appear bcforc rhe Municipal Court of tie Town for said violaions, and rryon beiog found
guilty of a violaion hereuadcr be prmished as provided in Sectioo l4-l of this code.E. Notice: Penaltr It is unlawfrtl for any person to 9iI e1 1e,fu5r to comply with the nodce of
the
Direcror of Public Works as provided in subsection B hereo{ arrd aay sucb person sball in
additioa to paymenr of the orpeosc of removal incurred by rhe Director of hrblic worls, as
providcd in zubsectioa B hereot upon bein€ found guilty of a violation herermder. be
punishable as provided in section l4-l ofthis code. (1997 code: ordimnce G (19?9)
PositionorRoladonshipro notertt (arlr'atlt,v.
(i.a conuacror or omer)
4/l\I l-', I 4)DilE: "l2lI1:t'
fiAR-22-39 14,32 FROM, TOV-COM -DEV-DEPT.
TOWN OFYAIL
D epartment of Community D ev elopmew
75 South Frontage Rool
Vail, Colordo 81657
970-479-213E
FAX 970479-2452
tD , s7@47 52924o
PAGE 3/?
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUAI\CE TIlvtE FRn't\lE
IfthispermitreqrrhesaTownofVailFireDcpaltmedtApproral,Engine<'s(PublicWorks)
review and approva! aPlaming Deparureat mi€l, of Healtll Depaonient review, and a rwiew
by the Building Depaltmeut, thc Flimated time for a total rwiew rnay take as lcng as threc (3)
weeks.
Allcommerpial(Iargeorsnall)andallrrnrlti.frmilypermitswillbavetofollowrheabove
mentioned ura<imum requiremedts. Residemial aid sfitall projects should take a lesscr amount of
timc, However, if resideotral or smaller projccs impact the various above mertioncd
deparmeoswfthregardtotrecessaryreview,theseProjectsmayalsoakethetkee(3)wEek
period-
Everyarrcmptwillbernadebyrhiqdepaltrgel|t!oorpcdiBtbispcrmitulssoonaspossible.
I, tbe rmdersipe4 understand the Plan chetk procedure and rime franre- I also undcrstand &at if
the pcrnrit is not picked up by the o<piration dare, tbal I rilst still pay the PIan chcck Fee arnd
tbat if I fail to do so it nay afect fuure perrnia tbat I apply for'
Agre€d to bY:
Project Narue:
o^n zfetlrrD
work ShJtvras 6*.a i*o rh. Cormrnity DwdopmentDcpt'
'- elr u\r'1 c. L-, W nrtcuu
S"ao-rua
AR-22-99 14. 32 FROM,TOV-COM-DEV-DEPT.1D ,9?@47 s2324
a
PAGE 4/?
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDTIM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OFVAIL PI]BLIC WORKS
JANUARY I, 1999
WITEN A .PIJBLIC WAY PERMIT: IS REQTJIRED
4.
5.
o.
7.
8.
*-lL h l
JoBNArvrE: 1-lli(\ l/-<rrlr.d_* I
-->- t ' ,,/DATE: ':/ .V I l-<>rt
PLEA,SE A}.ISWER TIIE FOLLOWNG QTIESTIONNATRE REGARDING TIIE NEED FOR .4*PUBLIC I'AYPERMIT':
l. Is this a neer r€sidence? yES NO X-
Is deruolition work beiag po'forued rlat rcqles the usc of the Rigtrtof-way, asernetrrs orpnblicpropeny? YES_ NO X_
Is ary udliry wo* necdcd?YES V NO
Is tie drivcway bein g rcyaved? yES NO )(_
Is a diferent acccss needed to rbe sie oder rhm the exi*ing drivenay? yES NO ><
Js;y a*acg ryrr beiry dme tha afeas tbe RigLrof-way, eas€rnctrts. or public properqv?lES NO v
Is a "Revocable Rigbtof-Way Permit* required? yES NO__V
lF fu Egn!-.I'way, cascments or p'btic property ro be used for staging parking or felcing?YES NO )1
Pr__If NO to 8A, is apa*ing gzging or fancing plan required by Comnunfu Developnear?YES_ _- NO__X._
If you answered Y'IES to auy of rhcse questioLt a'hrbtic way permit''oustbe ohained-
?ublic way Pcrnrif' applicarions oay be obuined at the hrblic work's oftce or al commrmry
Developureof lfyou have any quesioDs pteas€ call Loonard Sandoval from hrblic Wo*s at 479-Zl9E.
I HA\IE READ Al.rD AlrswERED ALL Tr{E AtsOlE QUES|IoNS.
Cont'actof ComparyName
.//D'r* 3 /st /tl)
%Bffi
lurfloe ttJonr 0Prr{-
ru*'gffiar
To:
PO Box 4030, Vail GO 81658
Phone (970) 949-1S00 Fax (970) 9494335
The Town of Vail
Subject: Illig Residence Remodel
From: Chris Meister
Pages: 1
Date: March 31,2000
Staging Plan Details:
Trash to be removed by trash tntck every week
Portable toilet location on the west side of the garage
Parking on site for 6 cars
No construction trailer on site
No exterior work at this tirne
Material will be stored inside the hottse or garage
-
--llr-lllr
BECK
/-7
-(
.l\
s\r;\-{./ru
'- *'_: _l
'lr)tdll t' il'J ll ii i
APR 0 6 ZuUO ,rj
----a.l\l
\)
..>
$,\. ,t
s
\-r$Ji'ii',,:.ii:\t . ..,. r.tt,:'r..o,,'.,.,,1)i..tt,.
[:,1:;l'lNj,... ,,,
-irn)r,.'lr,rj_*
)l
f:... r
$r
\,) -
\ i\ r*c\ i\ \
\', 1
\ '\ \
.t\
\
tl,
\
\
\
,clli,t
\d
\r
\i
i?
A
IDr-t
N.
\ts
I
\'r-t'
\-=', -' --\---
\tl\ r ''\i \
o- , \'\ \\)'\ \ r ,[:J\\ r -r-
\ \ ,1
''* tt ,\-''n
\ r41 Yi:i\
\ --{ 1.,r. i.,\
t
- ti \ \.:\., I r
,) \* \\ii ,i:r. ii' \ .tt liX i'tu. ,-f, I\=l\F"\ r\ l"\r$I lrl\ilJ\ il 1\ [\ rh' l\ret \tfrl *
o\
\
\
II
I
I
I
\I
I
I.t
t1
j
It
\\
|)r
J-f6
.\;/,..c-'7 \,
\
t'i'
ffin
l9'
\\
\\
'i'\
L\
t\rtr
Ar!,'
rl
.,$
=iSi
q
\=l=l-,/g
6?vl
a\W
To:
PO Box 4030,
Phone (970) 949-1800
The Town of Vail
Illig Residence Remodel
Chris Meister
1
May 17,2000
Staging Plan Details:
Trash to be removed by trash truck every week
Portable toilet location on the west side of the garage
Parking on site for 6 cars
No construction trailer on site
No exterior work at this time
Material will be stored inside the house or garage
Vail GO 81658
Fax (970) 949-4335
Subject:
From:
Pages:
Date:
TOI.{N OF VATL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2L38
DEPARTMEI T OF €OMMI'NITY DEVELOPMEIiIT
APPLICAI\M BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC
P O BOX 4030, VArt CO 8t-658
CONTRACTOR BECK & ASSOCIATES, TNCp o Box 4030, VAIL co 8L558
OI{NER
NOTE: TI{IS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
.fob Address: 706 FoREST RD
Location. - .: 7O6 FOREST RD
Parcel No. . : 21,01,-072-LL-022Project No. : PR.T00-0042
IttIG CLIFF
1l-504 Pawnee Circl-e, Leawood KS 662LL
,JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: 800-0107
Status...: ISSUEDApplied..: os/30/2000Issued...: 05/02/2000
Phone: 970-949-1800
Phone : 970 -949-1800
TOV/Comm. Dev.
ON
Description:
EXTERTOR REMODEL AND ADDITION
Fileplace Information: R€gtsricted: Y
occupancy: R3 single Family nesiden?Bproved
Ty;le ConsLruction: v N T)pe V Non-Raced a.:i-' 'rl'ii
valuation: 400, 000 Add sq Ft: 350 L'iiill'l
*of cas Applianced:
Raehualent Plan Revies-->
DRB Fee--------
Recreati.on F€e------ ---->
Clean-Up Deposit------ -->
Total. calcula!.d Fe65- - - >
Addicional Fees-- ------->
TotsaI P€rrnit Fee--- ---->
Paymenls-------
#Of Gaa lrogs:
FBE ST'MU.AX.Y
Building----->
PIan chcck- - ->
Inwestigation>
will call---->
1,940. OO
r.,251 .00
.00
3 .00
- oo
200.00
500 .00
Clean-up Deppsit Refund
zeL: _
#of 9lood/Pall-et:
3,956 -50
.00
3,955.50
3 , 9s6 .50.'."'"".";;'.;;;;;;;;;;TJ;;;;;..',.."'.i:3ii;i'..';#';ff;;;;';l;;;,."'."
05/30/2000 .JRM Act.ion: NOTE PLANS TO ,JR!,r06./02./2000 JRT't ACTiON: APPR APPROVEDITbM'' O54OO PI,ANNING DEPARTMEIiilT DEPT: PT,,ANNING DiViSiON:
O5I30/2OOO iIRM ACTiON: APPR PLANS TO A],LISON05/30/2ooo AOCSS AcEion: APPRIt-bm:'.05600 FIRE DEPARTTIENT Dept: FIRE Division:05/30/2000 JRM Action: APPR N/ArtbM:'OssOO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT: PUB WORK DiViSiON:05/30/2000 JRM Action: APPR N/A
See Page 2 of this Document for any condiEions thaE may apply to this permit,.
DECI.ARATIONS
f horeby acknowledge tshat I have r€ad this applicalion, filled out in ful1 the inforuation required, compl-etsed an accurate Plo!
plan, and at'atse that all Ebe informalion provided ae required is correct. I agree to corply with the inforuagion and ploc pl,an,
to colrply with all Town ordinancee aid sLate lass, and to build Lhie stlucture according Lo bhe Town'6 zoning and subdiviEion
codes, deElgn review approved, gnifortr Building code and oEher ordinanceE of, the Town applicable lhereco.
REQUESTS FOR iNSPECTIONS SIIALIT BE I4ADB TWEIfTY-FOUR HOURS II{ AD1IANCB
send Clean-UD DeDo€i.t to: BECK AND AESOC SIG!,IATURE OF OWNER OR COITTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF IND
Page 2********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS
Permit #: 800-0107 as of 06/02/Q0 Status---: ISSIIED********************************************************************************
Permir Ttrpe: ADD/AIT SFR BUILD PERMTT Applied-*: 05/30/2000Applicant--: BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC Issued---: 06/02/2000
970-949-1800 To Ercpire: LL/29/2OOO
ilob Address: 706 FOREST RDLocation---: 706 FOREST RD
Parcel No-- : 2L0L-072-LL-O22
Description:
EXTERIOR REMODEL AIiID ADDTTION
************************************** Condit,ions * * * :r :r tl * * * * * * * * it * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 . FrELD INSpECTIONS ARE REQUTRED TO C-IIECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
2. SMOKE DETEETORS ARE REQUIRED IN AI,L BEDROOMS A}ID EVERY STORY
AS PER S8C.310.6.]. OF TIIE 1997 UBC.
)rr,r.ust \ta-r--
9n*"ar*"*
\rCI l'.t- ''-
v
at*****t****f ****************+**************t***+***************
3; 956.5O 06/02/OO 09:.25
Init : iIAR
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO '.Statemnt.
t*l**:l*ttrll*****a*****l***********at*t**t*t:r*******it:l**t*******
Statennt Number: REC-0636 Amornt:
Pavment Method: cK Notation: 1144
Permit No: Bo0-0107 [rpe: A-BUILD ADD/AL.,T SFR BUIITD pE
ParceL No: 2101-072 -L1-O22
site Addlese: 706 FOREST RD
L,ocation: 706 FOREST RD
Total Fees:
3.956.50 TotaL ALL Pmts:
Balance :.o0
**********l*!t**!r****+l******i******!t*****+**********************
Account Code DeEcription
BP OO].O OO 031].].]-OO BUII.DING PERUIT FEES
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES
PF OO1OOOO31123OO PLAN CIIECK FEES
AD D2-DEPOS CLEA}IUP DEPOSITS
RF 11100003112?OO RECREATION FEES
ltc 00100003112800 WILL cAtL Il{sPEcSIoN FEB
Thie Payment
3, 956 .50
3,955.50
Amount
t_,940.00
200.00
L,26L.OO
500.o0
52.50
3.OO
,t{oz.oOE
-.
F
;-z
I
zo
(,0
.;
!l
Bt{o
E
Q
FT
F
U
UF
o
Ei
F
E
F
o
o
FIo
FI
()
'tF
oo
EI Ti
E
22
r:l E
rrl
FFI2ZETDEOFE
QZdproFE
HZ
AE
F
riF
NFi
2o
FT
E(J
zhl
E14
UO
o
F
F
FT
z
F,
o
;:
j
=>FlE14
140I
AppucArloNt ,- no, BE AccEprED rF IN..MPLETG q],,Jg+t?^" iiJiici *4 fl4i.-oD-=cc {'= , =auiiOing Permit #: FOo - Olo?
97 O- 47 9 -2749 (InsPectionu )
I[JIW\:IilEYAIL
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vall, Colorado 81657
S bing' mechanic*l' etc'!
Office at for Parcel *
Farcef #2lolo1Lil0L2--
JobAddress: -?06 Vt trw6l WaAtily Wddlnc-pr
rirlns:Vil\it{
' t afto 42.b . 60 99Address: frQOf I
Engineer: lAonrO e' i. Nc$et
description of work: v emll d-d.
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Renrodel
ffin EHu o.iilit this location: Yes ( ) No
Work Type: Interior ( ) b<terior
ffi; A.."tt"dauon Units in th's building: !-No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: !--
ffiVes() NoXr
D6es a fire Rlarm exist Yes ( ) No
CoMPLETE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERIqIT (Labor & Materials)
OTHER: $ELEfiRICAL:$ \4,00<:
TOTAT: g A4o oO O
PLUMBING: $ h0 ,QOp MECHANICAL: E Qt_00 U-
REFLIND CLEANUP DEPOSIT TO:
CONTRACTOR INFORMATIOI{
Wr;' *q 600
F:/everyone/forms/bldgPerm
q
\:t;/J
6Z
-{-\s\ffi
MEMO
PO Box 4030, Vail CO 81658
Phone (970) 949-1800 Fax (970) 949-4335
Town of Vail Community Development
Bill Anderson
Application for permit
May 19,2000
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Attached you will find 2 stamped sets of plans for the Illig remodel on X'orrest Rd..Note
that we currently have another permit_for.lhej4eriq"-ggce. This project has gone thru 2
separate appeals at theTOV Council and passed unanimously at both sessions..Because of
this process the project has been on hold for some time..[ am hoping that the permit can be
available as quickly as possible.
Thanks.
.4.Wa
Bill Anderson
Questions? Call the Building Team at 479-2325
Department of Community Development
Project Name:
Project Address:
All pages of application is complete
Has DRB appro\61 obbined (if required) Pmvide a copy of approval furm
Condominium Association letter of approval attached if project is a Multi-Family complex
Complete site plan submitted
Public Way Permit application included if applicable (refer to Public Works checklist)
)anct:?ur^td&-l
y/ This Checktist must be comDteted before a Buildind Permit aruilication is
arcotd.
,{
,{o
/
tr
,s/SAging plan included (refer to Public Works checklist) No dumoster'oarkinq or material storaoe- allowid on roadwavs and shoulders without written aooroval . | \y' lswtatest and results submitted if demolition is occurring (co?'t a-vt^rheA )/ Archited., stamp and signature (All Commercial and Mulli family) |
'y' fn floor plans including building sections and elevations(4 sets of plans for Multi-Family and
' Commercial)
y' winaow and door schedule
zd fun*ructural plans, including design criteria (ie.loads)
,{ SVudunl Engineer stamp and signature on structural plans (All Commercial and Multi Family)
o Soils Report must be submitted prior b footing inspection
t/X o Fire resistive asemblies specified and penetntions indicated
,{ Smov.edetectors shown on Plans
' y' ,rro and quantity of fireplaces sho,,rn
Applicanfs Signature:
5/tz_ /ooDate of submittal:
Received BY:
-F:/e\reryone/fiorms/bldperm2
NWNOF
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works)
review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review
by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review will take as long as three (3)
weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi-famif permits will have to follow the above
mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small pQects should take a lesser amount
of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
departments w6h regard to necessary review, these projects may also take three (3) weeK to
review and approve.
Every attempt will be made by this department to oFedite this permit as soon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. I also understand
that if the permit is not picked up by the expiration date, that I must still pay the plan check fee
and that if I fail to do so it may affect future permits that I apply for.
Agreed to by:
Project Name:
Date:
F:/everyone/forms/bldperm3
WHEN A *PUBLIC WAY PERMIT" IS REQUIRED
PLEASE READ AND CHECK OFF EACH OF THE FOLLOVVING QUESTIONS REGARDING THE NEED FOR A
"PUBLIC WAY PERMIT":
o Is this a new residence? YES
o Does demolition work bdng performed the Rightof-Way, easements or
tlpublic property?
r*NO
require the use ofNo-ts-
No_x_
o
rt
o
o
TT
Are there any improvemenB being done to the drivevvay ? YF-s NO2g
Is any utiliW work needed? YES
Is a different access needed b the siE otier than the o<isting driveway? YES- NO >'-
ts any drainage workleing done that affecB the Rightof-Way, easemenE, or public property?YEs- No--x-
/-Is a'Rerocable Rightof-Way Permif'required? YES- NO
Is the Rightd-Way, easemen$ or public property to be used for slaging, parking or fencing?
YES NO__*E
If answer is NO,is farkinO, staging or fencing plan required by Public Works?
If you ans,wered YES bo any of these guestions, a "Public Way Permif' must be obtained.
"Public Way Permif'applications may be obtained at the Public WorKs ofhce or at Community
Development (a sample is attached). If you have any questions please call Leonard Sandoval in Public
Works at 479-2198.
I HAVE READ AND ANSWERED AI.ITHE ABOVE QIJETIONS.
If')f.ul./'t)ecV ..rt49acid,]€8. )n c-
Job or Project Name:
Date Signed:
Contractor Signature
F:/everyone/brms/bldperm4
PUBUC WORKS AND THE PUBLIC WAY PERMIT PROCESS
How it relates to Building Permits:
If yes was answered to any of the questionS then a "Public Way" permit is requircd. YOu
can pick up an applicauon at either Community Development located at 75 South Frontage
Road or Public Works, located at 1309 Elkhom Drive.
uulities prior to signing applicauon. Sonre utility companies require up [o 48 hours notice to
schedule a locate.
> A consfiuction baffic contol/staging plan must be prepared on a separate sheet of paper.
An approved site plan may also be used. This dan will strow locations of all traffic control
deviies (signs, cones, etc.) and the work zone, (area of consfuction, S€ging, etc.). This
plan will o<pire on November lst and will need to be resubmifred for consideration for
approval thiough the winter. Be aware that your resubmision for winter may be denied
depending on the location ofconstruction.
and depth of work). this may be drawn on the traffic control plan on a site plan fur the job.
> Submit completed application to the Public Work's office fur review. If required, locates will
be scheduled for the Town of Vail electricians and inigation oeur. The locates take place in
the morning, but may require up to 48 hours to perform.
> The public Work's Consfuction Inspector will review the application and approre or deny
the permit. you will be contacEd as to the stahjs and any requirements that may be
neeOeO. Most permits are rdeased wifrin zl8 hours of being received, but please allow up
to one (1) week to Process.
F As soon as the permit is approved, the Building Department will be ndified, allowing the
..Building permif'to be released. Please do not confuse the "Public Way Permit" with a
"Building Permif.
) NOTE: The above process is for wot* in a public way ONLY. Public Way
permits are valid only until November 15th. A nerr Public Way Permit is rcquired
each year if work is not complete. Re-application each Nonember 15th does not
mean an automatic renewal.
I have read and understand the above.
F:/everyone/fo rms/bldPerm5
lltl"h //'- f.oz;tt
U DateSlgned
DRAINAGE AND CULVERT INSPECTIONS ARE REOUIRED BY PUBUC WORI(S!
Please read and check offeach of the items below:
o The Town of Vail Building Depaftment has developed the follovving procedures to
ensure that new construction sites have adequately establbhed proper drainage
from building sites along and adjacent to Town of Vail roads or sheets.
a The Town of Vail Public Works Department will be required to inspect and approve
drainage adjacent to Town of Vail roads or streets and the installation of temporary
or permanent culverts at access points ftom the road or street onto the construction
site. Such approval must be obtained prior to any requests for inspection by the
Town of Vail Building Department for fooUngs, temporary electrical or any other
inspection. Please call Leonard Sandoval at479-2198 to request an inspection from
the Public Works Department. Allow a minimum of 24 hour notice.
o Also, the Town of Vail Public Works Department will be approving all final drainage
and culvert installation with resulting road patching as necessary. Such approval
must be obtained prior to any Final Certifiote of Occupancy issuance.
Agr€ed to by:
I.t
\"lilt r a:rn A^ da*+oq
Print Name
o / /4'7,,,|tr
5rgnailre
Project Name:
Date Signed:
F 1 | e{ qy one I 'dinns I bldperm6
NVt{0F
Please read and check d each of the items below.
(Copies of complete to<t are avaihbE upon request)
CODE 5-2-10: DEFOSITS ON PUBLIC WAYS PROI|IBITED
o Unlawful deposits: Subject to subsection C thereof, it is unlaMul for any person to litter, track or
deposit, or cause b be littered, tracl€d or deposiEd, sand, gravel, rocks, mud, dirt, snow, ice, or any
other debris or material upon any street, sidewallq alley or public place, or any portion thereof.
o Notice; Abatement: The Direcbr of Public WorK may notiff and reguire any person who violates or
causes another to violate the provision of subection A hereof, or who has in the Directot's employment
a person who violates or causes anoffrer b violate the same, bp remor€ sudt saqd, gravd, rocks, mud,
dirt, snow, ice or any otier debrb or material within twenty bur (24) hours aftdr recgtOt of said notice
by the Direcbr of Public Works. In the arcnt tfie person so noffied does not comply with the notice
*ittrin tne period of Ume herein specified, tie Director of Public Works, or other au$orized agenL may
cause any such sand, gravd, rocks, mud, dirt, snow, ice, debrb or any other material to be relnored
from any street or alley at the o<pense of the notified.
o Summons and Penalty: As an alEmative b the notice for removal provided in subsection B abore,
any person who violates or causes another b violate the same, may be issued a sumnEns to appear
Oeioie tne Municipal Court of the Town for said Molations, and upon being found guilty of a violation
herzunder be punished as provided in Section 141 of this code.
o Notice and Penalty: It is unlarvftrl for any person to fail or refuse to compf with tie notice of the
Director of Public Works as prwided in subsection B hereof, and any such person shall, in addition to
payment of the o<pense of renpval inanrred by the Director of Public WorK, as proMded in subection B
heieof, upon beini fuund guilty of a violation hereunder, be punishable as prwirled in Section 14-1 of
this Code. (1997 Code: Ordinance 6 (1979)'
CODES 7-3A-LAND 7-3A-3: PARXING OBSIRUCTING TRAFFIC & IMPOUNDMEIiITAUTHORIZED
o No person shall pa* any vehide upon a street or at any other dace witiin this Municipality in such a
manner or under such conditions as b interferc with tfie free movement of vehicular U"fiic or proper
street or highway rnaintenance' (Ord. 2(1968) 5 1)
o Whenever any police officer finds a vehicle atEnded or unattended, sbnding upon any portion-of a
street or upon iny place within this Municipality in such a manner as to constihite a violation of any
section sf this Artiile, or left unattended for a period of twenty four (24) hous or ffiore and presumed to
be abandoned under the conditions prescribed by Colondo Revised Stahrtes section 4241102, as
amended, the offcer shall reguire the vehide b be removed or cluse it b be rermved and paced in
storage in the nearest ga6ge or other place of safety designated or maintained by thb Municipality, and
Ure cirarges for towind anl $onge oi such vehicle shall be charged to the owner of the vehide in
addition b a ten dottai($lg) impoundment charge. (Ord. 2(1958) 5 3: Ord. 28(1981) g 1)
I have read and will comply with the above code provisions:
Position or Relationship to Project:
Date signed: f{Wt b't*OO' 't\
F:/everyondformdbldpermT t"/
7,.----
.""ftT"Ix*'
l:cbruary' 18. 2000
Beth l-evine, Architect
1'}.0. Ilox 1825
Avon. CO 8 1620
*'u o\01
too'
Rt::Asbcstos Sampling and Rcsults
706 W. Forest Rd. Vail. C0
ND- None Detected
As requested, Family Environrnental Conrpliance Sen'ices, lnc. conductcd asbestos sampling and inspection at the
above referenced location. Tlre purpose ofthe asbestos sanrpling \\as to docullenl $'hat materials may cotrtain
asbestos prior to any scheduled ienouation . Famill Environmental Cornpliance Services- Inc' revieu'ed lhe
analyticai results to assist the arclritect in developing an abarenrenl strateg-v- belbre any dernolition or renovalion
activilie s could commence. The following table is a sunllnarv of our findings'
I
3650 Chestnut Ptaee ' Denver. Colorado A0216
Phong3O3-296-6O22' Fax:3O3-292-1451' E-mail:famonv@aol'c'om
Compliance
Serviees, Ine.
SUMMARY OF
TAlll-E I
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
706 W. Forest Rd. Vail CO r
-
Sanple
Number
Date Description PLM Results
SMOI 2/t4n000 Tape joint garage mech/u'ash room Trace Chrysotile
SM02 2n4nooo Surfacing nralerial at tape joint right side enttl' near
rock u'a ll
27o Chrysotile
SMO3 2/14n000 Surfacing material at tape joint main floor front ri,qht
window
ND
SMO4 2/14/2000 Surlacing malerial at tape joinl east rear bedroon')
wall 2nd floor
ND
sM05 2/14/2000 @of east bedroom 2no
floor
ND
SMO6 2/14D000 ffi'ND
sM07 2/t4/2000 ffifloot ND
3C0l 2/14t2000 f,ast U"aroonr cciling 3'd floor ND
3C02 2/14t2000 Bathroom ceiling 3'o floor ND
3C03 2/14/2000 W.st b.droor ieiling 3'd floor ND
SM0l-Vail 2/t6/2000 Point count SMOl sample ND
SM02-Vail 2/16/2000 Point counr SM02 sample ND
a
I
. Statc and l:cderal regulatorl, agcncics rcquirc lhc rcmoval ofashesros if it will be disturbcd during building
renovatio, or demolirion o.riuiri".- In gtncral. asbcstos falls into trvo (2) categories'
l) Friable asbeslos, which is asbcstos lhal catr be e'asily crunrbled undcr hand pressure' Friable asbestos is strictly
rcgulated and ntusl be rentoverl lry a ccnilied asbcsl()s abalelnenl colltracl('r prior to buildirrg renovation or
de"molition. No friable asbesros sas idcntificd al 706 W' Forest rd
2) Non-Friable asbestos that can easill bcconrc friable if danraged. lhele,larerials 3re
also strictly regulated and
nrust be removed by a certificd asbeslos abaletlcnl aunto"lo, prio, to buildin,lr renovalion or demolition' No non-
friable asbeslos was identifiec.
Elased on our review, Fanrily Environnrental ('onrpliance Services, Inc. rccomnrends the following:
The original samples both containcd a sntall amount ofasbestos and were point counted by another laboratory here
in Denver. The point counts were non detecl. This meanS that though there was a lrace it is below the I7o regulated
by state and federal regulations. Our onlv rccomntcndation-is that you keep dust and debris to a minimum and air
no*. If l,o, find any,iut"tiul you ,rtp"it bc surc to have them sampled and analyzed'
Reasonable effort was made b)' Farnill'I:nvironmcntal Compliance Services' lnc' to locale and sample suspect
rnalerials. llorvever, for any stn,cture. thc cxistcnce ofunique or concealed asbestos conlaining materials and debris
is a possibility. Family Environnrental docs l'lot warrant, guaranlee, or profess t() have the ability to locate or identify
all asbestos containing material in this slruclure'
I have attached copies ofthe laboralorv rcsults and my cenification'
Should you have any questions or rcquirc additional information' please feel free lo contact Bernard Hurley or
Samuel Rolf at (303) 296-6022 -
Sincerely,
Samuel Rolf. Asbestos Building Inspector
Family Environmental Compl iance Services. I nc'
-"J
FAMILY AN LABORATORY
o
SE RVICES, INC.
3650 CHESTNUT PLACE
DENVER, CO 80216
(303) 297-0019
(303\ 296-6022
February 15,2000
Sam uel Rolf
Family Environmental Compliance Services
3650 Chestnut Place
Denvcr. CO. 80216
Re: Vail-Remodel
Dear Mr. Rolf:
Attached are the results of Polarized Light Microscop),analysis for the presence ofasbestiform minerals
contained in the bulk sample materials subnined to this facility on 02-15-2000.
The methods involved for this evaiuation include a macroscopic inspection using a slereoscope to
accurately determine surface physical properlies. Any surface, inclusion or debris detected within the
sample that exhibits physical properties differenr and unique from the original sample submitled for
analysis is considered a 'Layer' and, ifseparable. analyzed as a single material contributing to the content
of the total sample. Each material is then anall,zed by polarized light microscopy (PLM) in compliance
with the guidelines established by the EPA in its Inrerim Method for the Determinalion of Asbestos in Bulk
Samples as found in 40 CFR, Parr'163, Subpart F. Appendix A (EPA/600/R-93|l16). Family Analytical
Laboratory Services, lnc. is currently accredited for bulk asbestos analysis by the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) ofthe National lnstitute ofStandards and Technology
(NIST). Our NVLAP laboratory code number is 200448.
Through the procedures noted above, the sample is separated according to homogeneity and layering and
the principle fibrous and non-fibrous components in each sample are determined. The fibrous components
are then classified as either asbestos or non-asbestos and a percentage composition range is determined for
each asbestos rype identified. A total asbestos content for each material and an overall/total sample
percentage is then calculated. Further evaluations are made to determine size and morphology ofasbestos
materials identified. For identification purposes, asbestos includes chrysotile, cummingtonite-grunerite
(amosite), crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite and anthophyllite. Asbestos "fibers" are generally classified as
crystalline material, which occurs within in one ofthe commercial asbestos categories noled above, has
physical dimensions longer than 5 micrometers (um), and has a length-toldiameter ratio of 3 to I or greater.
Results of these evaluations are listed in the following REPORT OF TEST RESULTS. These results
pertain only to the samples referenced in this report and none other.
This report is confidential. Details of this report will not be discussed with any person or agency not
associaled with you or your organization. This report must be reproduced in its enlirety and shall notbe
copied in part. Ifyou have any questions regarding the content ofthis report, please call us. If Family
Analytical may be offurther assistance in other health and safety areas ofconcern, please let us know.
ANALYST
o
ALYTICAL
.J
"J
fr.&,n7
Tim Bergqu isf, C6ologisr
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
Fa m ifA n
" li;:?: :#":l?.::'"1 ;"'u"' I n c'
I'l-lr4 Ilulk Asbestos Analvsis
lient & Pro.lect ID: Vail-Renrode I
Corlplcted: 02-15-00
LGN: 000079 l0F4
Sample No:sM-01 LAYER 2 LAYER 3 sM-02 LAYER 2
Description:JOINT
COMPOUND
DRYWALL TAPE SURFACE
JOINT
COMPOUND
BASE JOINT
COMPOUND
Lavers:YES-30%3Oo/o 40%YES.60%30%
Physical Prop €ntes
Color:WHITE WHITE TAN WHITE SAME
Texture:Cementicous GYPSUM FIBROUS Cementrcous
Friable:YES YES YES YES'
Visible Fibers:NO YES YES NO
Est Asbestos:0 0 NO 0
Homooeneous YES YES YES YES
% Asbestos Fiber Conlent
Chrvsotile:z
Amosile:
Crocidolite:
Anthopholite:
Termolite:
Fiber Content z ND ND ND 4
70 Non-Asbestos Fibers
Cellulose:20 98 1
Fiberqlass:4 2
Synthetics:
Vermiculite:
Other (sDecifv)
Total Non Fibrous:75 z 97 95
Asbestos Overall Total
o/o
I|a
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: All unique material layers within the same sample are analyzed and reported individually and the
overall / total sample 7o asbestos content is then determined and reoorted.
ND=Done Detected
Anarvsr: {x-fu"K.{Date:0211512000
i
Famill Analltical Laboratorl' Service, Inc.
Report of Test Results
PLM Bulk Ashcstos Anall sis
-rllicnt & I)roiect lD: Vail - llcnrodcl
Conrplctcd: 02- l5-00
LGN: 0000792OF4
Sample No:SM-02 LAYER SM-03 LAYER 2 SM.O4 LAYER2
Description:TAPE JOINT
COMPOUND
DRYWALL JOINT
COMPOUND
DRYWALL
Layers:lOYo YE5.60%40%YES-50%500k
Physical Properties
Color:BROWN WHITE WHITE WHITE WHITE
Texture:FIBROUS Cementicous GYPSUM Cementicous GYPSUM
Friable:YES YES YES YES YES
Visible Fibers:YES NO YES NO YES
Est Asbestos:0 o n
Homogeneous YES YES YES YES YES
% Asbestos Fiber Content
Chrysotile:
Amosile:
Crocidolite:
Anthopholite:
Termolite:
Actinolite:
Fiber Contenl ND ND ND ND
% Non-Asbestos Fibers
Cellulose:98 2 60 OU
Fiberglass:
Synthelics:
Vermiculite:
Other (specifv)
Total Non Fibrous:z 98 40 99 40
Asbestos Overall Total
o/o
z 0 0
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: All unique material layers within the same sample are analyzed and reported individually and the
overall / total sample 7o asbestos contenl is then determined and reoorted.
Date:j2/15/2000
\J
Familv Anal_r,'tical Laboratory Sera,ice, I nc.
xeporr or Test xesurts t
PLM Bulk Asbeslos Analvsis
Complctcd: 02-15-00
I-GN: 000070 3OF4
Sample No:sM-05 LAYER 2 sM-06 LAYER 2 SM.O7
Description:SURFACE
JOINT
COMPOUND
DRYWALL SURFACE
JOINT
COMPOUND
DRYWALL JOINT
COMPOUND
Layers:I YES-40% | 60o/"T YES-6b%--T4o%--+-lNo
Phvsical Pror rerties
Color:WHITE WHITE WHITE WHITE WHITETexture:Cementicous GYPSUM Cemenlicous GYPSUM CementcousFriable:YES YES YES YES YESVisible Fibers:NO YES NO YES NOEst Asbestos:o 0 n U n
Homogeneous YES YES YES YES YES
o/o Asbestos Fiber Contenl
Chrysotile:
Amosite:
Crocidolite:
Anlhopholite:
Termolite:
Actinolile:
uontent ND ND ND ND ND
o/o Non-Asbeslos Fibers
Cellulose:50 1 70 2Fiberglass:
Synthetics:
Vermiculite:
Other (specifv)
Total Non Fibrous:100 oo 30
Asbestos Overall Total
%
0 0 0
Date:jzl1512000
Tim Bergqui
ADDITIoNAL GoMMENTS: All unique material layers within the same sample are analyzedand reponed individually and theoverall / totar sampre o/o asbestos content is then determined and reported.
ND=Done Derected c
Analvst: 6r/,
Fa m i r5t n'
l"';:?l kT":iilTi:"U'' I nc
I'l-M Bu lk Asbestos Analvsis
lient & Pro.jcct lD:
('omplctcd: 02-15-00
LGN: 000079 40F4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: All unique material layers within the same sample are analyzed and reported individually and rhe
overall / total sample %o asbestos contenl is then determined and reported.
ND=Done Detected
Anarl,st:fih*ryZ/
Ti m Bergq uist.r'fil'frosiopi st
Date:02/15/2000
CEILING
TEXTURE
% Asbestos Fiber Content
% Non-Asbeslos Fibers
Asbeslos Overall Total
o/o
Fiber Content
^-^ ^fl'n r:r .
bilVUA.lJJ LAB NU. tolusb.U
AIHA LAS I D
'0153:'
,ASa€S7OS rEx. PCB. PLr'l. SEM
HTfALS AA. F LAME,'FI)RNACE
AINEORNE PART'CULAfES
SPEC'AL PA NTICL E
'V./lI 'S'S
ResenvorRs ETvTnoNMENTAL
Senvrces, Iruc.
t
fi27 GEANf STREEf OENVEN. COLORADO 8O2OJ (800t 67E-7371 (303t 830-1986 FAX (303) 853-9196
February 17, 2000
I',iL. Bernard Hurley
Family Environmental
f-nrnn l i :nr-o Qorrli r-ac Tnr-
3550 Chestnut Place
Denver, CO AOZI€.
RE: RES Job No. 56828-1 - Vail Remodel - Bulk Samples: SM-01-Vail
and SM-02-Vai1.
Dear Mr. Hurley:
Reservoirs Environmental Services, inc . (RES, Inc - ) Ilas poin-'
counted two bul-k material samples by Polarized Lrght Microscopy
(PLM) for asbestos content as per your request. The samples v.rere
received on February l- 6, 2OoO, and initial results were teLephoned
to your office within 24 hours of receipt. PLM was used to analyze
the bulk materials in complrance wiLh guidelines escablrshed by the
USEPA (EPA/500/R-93/ l.r5). The Analytical Results are presented in
'IaD_Le 1.
RES, Inc. has assj-gned job number RES 66828-1 to this study. Thls
report is considered highly confidential and the sole propercy of
PamiJ-y Environmental . RBS, Inc. will not discuss any part of this
study wit.h personnel oLher than those of the client. The results
described in this report only apply co the samples anal)'zed.
Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless 'l onger storage
is reguested. The US EPA guideline was developed for use on
friable building materiafs and recommends the use of additional-
analyses for non- friable materj-al-s such as floor tiles. RES, Inc.
recommends addiLional analyses Lo confirm negative PLM results on
fLoor ti1es. This reporc is not to be reproduced, except in fui-,
wit.hout specific wri-tten approval by RESI . This report must noi be
used to claim endorsemen: of products or analytical :esulcs by
I$/T,Ap -r Anw a.'pnc\..' of r iro rI S - GOve::nmenc .Only the PLM
microscopy results contained in thrs report are subject tc NI,/LAP
accreditation, other inf ormacion presentecl is not NVLAP a,:c::::ji',+d.
I
:h lepo:-L, pl-ea se f eeI
o
t^Tf \.rnrr shnrrld h,:v,,.1v*free to calf me at
Sincerely,
i
/'1r' z t't''':J
,T,.:: n n 6 Qrronnor Arr
Vice President
PKTI/clr
--,, ^.,^^F i ^-^ -Lany quesr lors aDou L
830-1966.
rw8.ffif*A"
Anafyst (s) :Brett S. ColbertPaul F- Knappe
Paur u . Lo sca-L zoLiu Wenlong
i
aesOor*s ENVTRoNMENTAL T.**r,C.,"".
NVLAP Accredited Lab 1896
TABLE 1. PLM BULK ANALYSIS. PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY POINT COUNT
RES Job Number: RES 66828-1Client: Family Environmental
Client Project: Vait Remodel
Date Samples Received: February 16, 2OOO
Analysis Type: PLM, Point CounrTurnaround: 24 Hour
Client
Sample
Number
Lab lD
Number ASBESTOS ASBESTOSLAYER MINERAL CONTENT
ANALYZED Point
Count
(%',
SM-01-Vail
SM{2-Vail
EM 464927
EM 464928
ND
ND
ND = None Detected Analyst: PDL
Trace = Asbestos observed but not counted under point count protocol, less than O.25o/o
F
',, J
I\S BIiS OS
C EIt' t'I l.' I L- z| l] t O N
S'tr';\'I'Il Oii COLOI{ADO
(-lr'lc:':lrlo l)cp:':.i': ::cttt crl llrrl:l!c I Ic';rlt It'
:'rrt tl l:. :ili t'ctt it:tlt: t
'\ ir' l)cr!!li{!i:: Co:ttrcl l)ir isiort
'l'his i, :'iil'its llr;it
Srtl .:ul liolt'
i-', I :ri;,.,,1i, l{t:r. 151 ':i)-il9l
jrti.; r::.1 1!l(l t' r:i .!(':::r':iis t. -:-l--i07' (-' li'S' :tirtl .,\!l' (')ri:tji{-l
(..r-':iil,'i (-r-i;11;::i:'li-'.t li'.:llil:,:. -:t .rr-'' li. it:lt t i"' :ttltl is ):':t t'l)-r'
Crri:ri,:rj l-lt l!:r'r,:,lt r-;i'(-'('1,-.'.,ilt) ilt tl:C i'Ollt-lrl'irr:i ti iSr-!t:lillt::
ljt. I I-lJ l\(, INsllli(- L-o lL'
' '!':: !s tt:tij'itr::t i:
spcc .:it'! ':!.t: '.
/'\ ,J,,. "\
\-/-/ t-l\''',r-\ / r--J ..-)\\-.-X o'r\,v:=.-\1i; -.9j:-'':-'':{'J- - -
...,,, i,.,, i,, r ,.,,|ii.''D).i, ;.r ., , r'r:' r i. c
()
:i:r' 1.t' t::.':,: ,'f c:::tt::!.1jjL;i-'t ('::i-ii(;::it':: ": :!:"' ;li:'ti;:lit:t'
Best
copy
Available
Qo" I'\p
Sdgtxra TurU-J
50%
ytu
'',r?.--:-' \J''v.'
^'r,;iu' o lt /--A V/,l/
--'O--
ti
07
t,/.'
,r 8!ti'"'', // '---tl
-l
a(
t
n
It
F.*ffi,*
- \ -- /, /
.//z2/i)''l /
- t t'i-', / /
at {: -t /
" - Q;)r:-',
e tr.
!- l;.d
tt ,'6
4
|c:lf4 -
O^ ei.t'fl
E*lJt
I
:;.4#ilt
,--\ _-Jr,frr<- \irt \
\'o'* - d {
\ - jF"t=:
W
rf )-.--t
'l
Q\t
A
'-ft.5'.
:9., -'t:l--- ,-- - --:4 | -a3o(Tt-- i ,.' t
,'-;l+,tE --ty' | /
'*aa
7ilS*a*\.t(\>Xi-'-''")/$,.-/e
?\
, ,(.wffi
*-;-i=
xa;e'>. Ct+-ldl
lwL
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 8A657
97 0 -479 -2138
Job Address:
Location. . . :
Parcel" No. . :Project No.:
APPLICANT BEEK & ASSOCI.ATES,
P O BOX 4030, VAIL
CONTRACTOR BECK & ASSOCIATES,
P O BOX 4030, VArL
OWNER
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVETOPMEIVT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON ,JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
DEMO. OF PART/ALL BI]DG.Permit #: D00-0006
706 FOREST RD Status. .
706 w FOREST RD (west uniApplied.
2L0L-072-LL-022 fssued..
Expires.
ISSIJED
03/03/2ooo
03/03/2ooo
08/30/2ooo
Phone: 970-949-1800
Phone: 970-949-l-800
Ks 6621j. TOV/Comm. Dev.
Clean-up De it Refund
approved
fof Oas lroga:
Total- Calculated F€es--->
AddiEional FeeB--------->
TotaL Permit Fee-------->
Pa] nenta-------
TOTAI, PEES----- 945.00 BAIdNCE DUE---- .00
Dept: BUILDING Division:
DepL: PLANNING Diwision:
Depts: FIRE Divi-sion:DCbI: PIJB WORK DiViSiON:Debt: HEALTH Division:Debt: CLERK Division:
;;.;;; ; ;; ;; ;":;;.;;;;; :;;;;;; ;;; ";;;;.;;; ;;;
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknorledge that I have read tshis appl.ication, filLcd out in full t'he infornaEion required. coEPleted arl accutatc plots
plan, and statc that alt tshc infor,aation providcd as required is corlect. I ag:.ee bo corqrly with the r-nfonoation and Plot plan,
tso cortply *it'h all Aosn ordinances and state 1aes, and Eo build tshis stsruceurc according to thc Totn'g zorting and eubdiwiaion
code6, dedign review approwed, Uniform Building code and other ordj-nances of che Torn applicablc thereto.
REQUESTS FOR TNSPEEIO}IS SHALL BB IIADE T'!{ETITY.9OUR HOURS IN ADVANCE SY
send clcan-Ub DeDosit To:
INC
co 81558
INC
co 81658
ILLTG CLIFF
1-l-504 Pawnee Cj-rc1e, Leawood
Description:
II{:rERIOR DEMO "only"
Occupancy: R3
TIpe Construction: V 1-HR'I\pe Occupancy:
ValuaEion:
Fireplace Infontration: R€slricted:
40,000
*of eas AppLiance6:
Restuarant Plan REwiew- - >
Recreation Fee- --- -- - -- ->
Clcan-Ulr Depo8it- - - - - -- ->
*of wood/Pallec:
420 ,00
273.OO
. oo
3 -OO
.00
.00
.00
250.00
946 .00
945.00
946.OO
APPROI/ED
N/A
sinsle Fami-t-y nesiaeflfBou nt
rypa v l-Houi date
Add Sq Ft:
FEE SUMMARY
Building----->
Plan chcck- - - >
Inv6stsigation>
wilL call---->
ITCM: O5].OO BUILDING DEPARTMEI T03/03/2000 .lRM Action: APPRIt,EIn3 O54OO PI,ANNING DEPARTMEI{T03/03/2000 'JRM Act,ion: APPRITEM: O55OO FIRE DEPARIMETITII,CM: O55OO PI]BLIC WORKSIIEM: O57OO ENVIRONMEIiTTAL HEALTIIItem: 05900 LIQUOR
********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS
Permit # r D00-0005 as of 03/L4/00 Stat,us: ISSIIED
********************************************tr****************************:t******
PermiE. Tlpe: DEMO. OF PART/AIL BUDG.
Applicant: BECK & ASSOCIATES, rNC
97 0 -949 -1"800
Job Address:Location: 705 W FOREST RD (west unit)
Parcel No: 2101-072-1,L-022
Descript,ion:
IN:TERIOR DEMO IIonlY'l
Applied: 03/03/2OOOfssued: 03 / 03 /2000To Elq)ire: 08/30/20A0
CondiEions:
1-. FrRE DEPARTI4ENT APPROVATJ rS REQUTRED BEFORE ANY WoRK cAN BE
STARTED IF THERE IS A FIRE ALARM OR SPRINKLER SYSTEM EXIST-
ING IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCT]ON. THIS SIILL PREVENT FALSE
ATARMS.2- FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
3. ASBESTOS TEST RECEIVED AND IN FILE
v
llil**:tir**lit+*ta**:lt*f1:l**lltA**rl+t*l**tilt*******t*rti++*ta*****
TO!{N OF VATIJ, COLORADO Statemnt
************irll***********l******)r******a**********'r*****a:rt***t
Statemnt Number: REC-06L0 Amouxt :945.0o 03/L4/oo L4:.3O
Pa)ment l{ethod: C}IECK Notation: *4098/beck Init : RIriW
Permit No: D0O-0006 Tlpe: A-DEMO DEMO.
Parce.L No: 21-01- 072 -1-]--022
SitE AddTEgs: 706 FOREST RD
Location: ?06 W FOREST RD (weet unit)
Total Fee6:
OF PART/ALL BU
This Pa)ment 946.0O Total ALL Pmt€:
Balance:
**************ttrl****l*********+*t**t:ll***************t***+t***l
Account Code DescriDtion
945 - OO
946 . OO
.00
AmounE
420 - OO
273 . O0
250.00
3.00
BP OO1OOOO31111OO BUIIiDTNG PER!'IT FEES
Ptr 00100003112300 PLAI.I CIBCK FBES
AD D2 -DEPO8 CLBANUP DEPOSITS
WC OO1OOOO31128OO WILI, CAI,L INSPECTION FEE
oo
'H!E.oOI
iotzODd8
E
Al4
o
o
oo
o
al
o
<;
al
F-2ilDd8Er,Hoi020
dEoo
E&
E{
Eg*
E
Eo
P
o
o
ct
o
rt
c.l
at
o
oo
o
6a
uE
o
t,
!laqt
D
F
t
H
6
oEt{
EcU
Et,:r
6
o
aEH
olsl
{HHxroUOtsAa!lo
OE
aglee
H8&a
cEL
'(
E{ lree
Egl[ra
IE
P
X
E
HHrrz
Ei
E
EI
Eo
*
zo
FI
HECIUaaZE
gEIH8 EEI SCE 6-
H
Ho
U
E
iE
E
29
EE
FI
P
AE
F9
E6
=>E-rr.dd o1EaoaEO t
i,\Fr-o3-oo 03:23P ]'r5raune ck.--Rd- Ros.rn --P-ZgtE-?stst3
TOIVTI OF VAIL C(ITI8TRUCNON PERT|TAPPLICATIOI{ FORN
q!rclIrflN lqsrlF cmLtlforr+ AFuCr:ttoil rlr,ryE'n.llEt
P -C)2Gry3 'aa?
tfr, fn 4, Co|rf fsrst Ortu A 97O-'iW F M ]Ht-zlal -07L arr - 6:Y
nciq
p-x*, d)rl4-
-
16'r*
I
relocstli* ,t-Lsg*J-
m-x*4tr# lllr
xge',fublzttt
I}-ilrtood
wcb r5( I rrr-|6 rvel( )llri( )
lwcDr&crr* | aAa,4 L d)r1lo..l lEtcffffi!ffbl&-
lfirrdDfdfal- errfbcr Oslrrt wodrE|lr
.. /.\ore: t-j{U B>---=-
T('TAL 3 '/
ulq( )n$r( )
ESEfgrEfr
D.lqrEdls:
TcrdVrtl4idarb
xffiqrry
Torodvdn:i*rbNa
Pcrid( )rBr-rt( )(Ils( )
^-qh-qt-tbt8
rw q2o'4q
oh( ) (Ur r-C
lllgnrcrl t
IGCHANICAL
'Frrn crqrFrrYlil
A&uc
ht
A&
br
ttcf
EOB.gESAIE
.6h ll,t*a
'awncc CivCle
GLEilq[F4frEEf.uP.rIl: ,-.
-
-.
M€-E:_Og_- O_g O3:Z3P 1151 June Ck- Rd- Flo.scn 9t7o-9t26-2993oo
To:
rrilt
I'AIE:
IIIBIECT:
coor, sr-rc- EGIll q llLrIG V^llitlolEllr
A frdrrat dnotr SbtEb J[bdi8 C ticcof ir L rt'qr't fu ry gcrro o tiu'
mct c rlopcir' -cif,ifra"d'-d a drdE4 d' !n,cl' rodsb n4 dEl'
o* ha csy orr l*b q'"ra;.rw6uy 3d' d&rc&' ellt'Y cptru. ubq c
rypctictratdB Ndic lE* Tb Duad|dhtrbcrt'clr-w rsld rrqtllt q- 1m rb
rdc a c.,E d;;;I*-i-r"'ti- .f glsti r 'nc
c rb br i rtc
otro.' caloyu ;d. d"fitct c cs da to viorc 6c aD' !09
rqrrt nct a' galt.-ro*, uri Cgl'st'iecol-drr&rr c grrl rilb
F,4 hr eo 5' .i-=;; r.i'l-ta-- w o. Jrg.oa d 15lic $'otb. I! rb
G;il;; ; ;d; ;ffi-.qly.fr io ui,o -ur bG Dcrit'c of, tiE btciD
*i6ed, & Dirarifrtbwd' i bt to-i*l {cG urrv'arrc.ry rrh s{
F;ffi*- ;{' atg ;;i* a& c r-" oc' |!Ia:rl n bc tuuwd ffir 4 s(r
i. Uyrtry.drt:si6d-
c. hgrirr nt Ppltri.t ;;bt"do A baef&l nc bcdic-b:
r. gtoci-d-ri ffi, c*ds ra.ret ll?&grric ofrr
rura r rtky cd;;;Al"-r-il aocri*V liq 9s bc, Cobc lh'
awIlEtEFEF - ..t.---:- J*,- n{a-2 To dacc c-+ EFi-t|r, H'|ryhtcssiu d6c pt|b t.trv; rd
3. Topdie rc lbtrfrtt -fi 9t-1?-t rfsdsur.
D Sglmq Fcolr rsl rrualircr&ldrfilag'/at eot'Ua b sbrrin B
-oGrEYgs rb vidlr t qrs rldor ro virhclb llr' ury Dc irral I r@'r5 b
ffi ;a; 6. rt-fiiaffi * l- t* viotric' rd re hior tuld
=mfrffiffidxuxg:ffi#il#tu'
fb*r t* Worlr I rovild-ir dcsb B hrlc' rd qv or\ran n'[' b
r&icoprpardl-G;-,tawnrintradlut.Drno$nli.rvorc'rr
qovided b rbcb tlffi -bttog taeg.lv er vrllb tsd' tc
frffffi-hGt"Er;ai; c"d drz coc (}rrbre6 (ree)
P.03
Alt CONII^GKnS qnnE{ILY nEGLrrnED vrrtr TrG Toslrt (F VAIL
ru,lt oF v [,E EiG rurs Aro co]oflBtrrrDEvE.oEriElrr
HNUTNY T. I,,9
O(trTSIIUCTKT{IAIXING AI'DMAIEII L $m/rGE
WndUrfialrr;ctY
ffil*&riior; = i lu&1'
Oc.wcmtn.?'4'P
M+r-03-OO 03:.24P rrsldrnc ck. Rd- Rosen s7o-i5t-zse3
m/Wffi
/frryurrntt {c.arurit;, W'a$
75 W fivnrlr Rat
l&riL Wrdo E165,
97W79-ZIt6
,ax 97rL4792452
llfi,.Drlfc l[lril ls$ltx{cE lU }rA.rD
Iffr! f.iln |Euirco r Tcra of, vril Firc Dt3brt rE ova\ F gr..t!"I ohblic wstr)
IGVtar d rpoal, e nufu Dsprrwl rcvicx ofHrrttt D+|rffi ilvict' d e rcvicr
tytG eild{ Orytarc, 6: crincd rirc fq t tdl rcricr rny dc s bl erlbn (3)
?E&t,
A[ wrirl (b lc 6 tndl] rld a[ nrtrt&ilv P'rlril dI b'! to 6llil lb rbot'c
gfurrf roiorn ru5!@. nsidCil rd roll Foicrr Afrlt CE r tcr rmrrr of
ric- llorrrrr, ifnridaiet rrlLt!fiicdr iqa,rtc vriflt rDort uaiond
daure rtl rt|rrt o rcrrcy nwign' |lto tsUilErt r|y .bo *G 6! ttE (t) !"f
D.rioc
E'rsy &?3 riu bcD& b 6b d?.rd b -ito(&! |lir prairer lo |. pciblc.
r. tc ndrrrirec4 rra&sd &o Pho ctc* rwcole ed tilE !rB. I rlro rndrrgd thn if
Oc p.rrril & not piAai ry by rb apilio dle rh- | uf $lll Drv tte Plo S*k Fcc d
rbt if I IUI b & s ir cy rftc fiotr gtrub br I agly fc'
Alrdtofy:
F'F'LG /lltq [he4/ue
* a+'90
tckrrwoc'@Iteff*
P.O4
4rcg-'rs
MF_{:99:O.O o.?224P ll5l June Ck- Rd- Roscn 97o-9t26-2993
tqFIflG
DATE
IE:
IDNAIG
r.tl@ll0ur
^LLGC'TRACTqSrowll 0F vA!. ro[.Ic s(xf,s
ta{nRY L l'9,
t I€f A ?U8JC wAYEllllr: 5 BEqInE
P-05
DA!E: . a',zad
'tlrrsE
a{sflElrE FCLow!{G aiJEsttoorAsE raorrD[ro TE I{EDD FOn A
'?tE.tCgAYPEltIf: .J
l. ltrlirralibcc? Y'ES- !S--C-
2.r34DUlriltd|3Dfuilrq$rbcd'bri|rd-rrlt''CEIEq
FflEFF ? YES- lP i.- |
Xt. tl-rcrqtrddn tES- *-J
4. lrrLtirrryui3ryt'd? ltS._ !{O,..\"-
7.
a,
5-
lr al'4t E3ryrf : rE - '-vJLr- v
!r I |tfta E Dld o t:irfi ti!tucfrit*&rr*lf fEi- !{g..:L
t. ry dlrfC rdFt dc lh& lb ni![*Wry' cxl' cfdic pqa'?
YEs_ lD4_ \/brra,o*niaId-wuwnltrt t'Es- !04-
A. b rtl lifLd-wry, rocilb fV o boud tu silg fdq! I ariu?
YEtt_ lp-a. fF-lo lA ffir rrhr ctrnll ilrtrliliDt Crl4t n:c$clt
YES_ ts-
frilsrrd tT$ 5 ry o(*r' grric, r?ltliswrv Pr-f nrlc d*d
?te wryI|edf |ttlic|dEEr t aurdl tl Hic ltd'r olicc c n cm{y
DreryL $clrry g:dsilE- cILs 5&d nul\flic sut la7}zrri
I EAI/E IEAD A}D
^I{T,EIED ^LL
IE
^M1'EQT]E!ilONS'
fu&r. b,utrc- -, Fet+ teYine, 4rchrb.t
Cffi3trn OqEyNc
Mar-03-OO 03:24P ll5 ne ck Rd-*o*:
:"5"-=""=famllg
Environmental
vf
As rcquesrc:d. Farrrily lirvinmrncnlat c(|rnFliance survices' tnc. conrtuctcd anbcstos srmpling and insDeclion al thc
abovc rcfcrrnctxl lq:atinn' r frl p"tr"t* iitftt d$rsros sanrPling was to &:lcumcrrt wlral lnirlcrials nrry contoirl
&shs$los pri(tt to nny srhcdulcd i:llovation ' Fanrily €nrimnmcnial (lompliurcc Scrvic6' hK- rtvi€wr:d lhc
analyrical rcsulls to ui.$asl tfre oichitccf irt devcloPin8, an abatemcnt Sfratcggt beforc alry dcnrolition or rtrrovation
o"Aiirl* "ruf.f
otnur$ncc. 'l'hc following rablc is a sutttmary uf our lindingr'
lJuo P.06
Fctrurry lt. l0l)ll
llCth l,cvrnc. Archilccl
P.O. lh:t ttl25
Avon.('()tl(r2O
Itlr: Asbc{os SsmPlidt and l(csults
7(l(r W lirnst lld. Vail. Co
Compliance
SIJMMARY OF ASIIFSTOS CONI'AININC MATERIALS
'l'apc joint garag,e mcchAvash nrom
S.,rfacit gjttot"rial al lspc joinl right sidc entry near
nrch rrall
:inf*';c ma*ti"i-ar up loint main floor fiont righl
Tnuc Chr;xolilc
Sildi,tB .tl"ti0l tr tupe joinl east n:ar bedroom
5-tr*ing;;G;;Il"t* *indow of easr bcdmom
Bathruom ceiting lN fluor
Wcst bcdroom ctili
SMOl-Vail
ND- Nonc Dcl€clcd
3650 Choelnrrt Place ' Derwcr' erilrrrgd{-e02l6
Phone: 3oi{-2g6'b\22' t"*rgOS-292'1451 o E-rnail frncnY@'ol.rrrrn
Mar-o3-oo (,32z4P r rsrdrnc ck- Rd- Rosen -92o970 6-?993
. Statc an(l lrrlt:ral rcgula(rrr-v apt:ncicr rrrquir.) th{: rcrnov;rl ofashcsrx it'it tvill be disturbcrl dr,rinlr lrriltlirtu
(rnnvrtion or dcrnolition ctivilir's. lrt gcncral. ashrrstor lhlls into trvo (2) catcgiorics,
l) Friabtc asbcstos. which is ashcstos lhal can hc casilr'' crunrblcd undcr hartd prcssurc. Friehlc asbcsos ir stricll-v-
rtr'.ulatcd anal [txsl bc rcttt$vcd hy a cenificd ash:slrx abatcntcnl c()otrdclor prior tO buildillg r|:lx)Y lirnl |'|r
dcmoliliorr. No friablc astxstrn was idcntified ut 706 W. Forrst rd
2) Ngrr-ljrhtblc ashcstos thst can casily hccomc l'riablc it durnagcd. l hesc nralcrials arc also strictlv rcgulatcd and
musl bc rcrtl.rvfd lry I ccnilicrJ llsbcstos rbirlcrrcrr cortrucl(|r pri.I trr building, rcoovglion tu dr:trtrtlilirttt. No non-
tiiablc asb(':itrrs was idcnlil'icd.
llascd un our revicw, ljnrnily linvironmcntal (irmplian(c Scrvicc'ri, lrtc, tecommends thc followin.q:
Thc original samples both containcd a small mount ol'ruhtstos and wctt point counlcd by nnollnt laborator-v trcrc
in Dcnvlr. lte ;xrint counls wcrc rnln dctcul. This ntcatts lhat lhough thcrc was s tracc il is below thc 19" rqulatcd
by slatc anlt lirdcral rcglulations- Our only rccomnrcndntion is lhat yorr keql du5t and dckis lrt a trtitrintuttr and ;rir
flow. Il-yuu find arry rnittcrial you suslrct b,c suns to hnvc them Sarnpled and unnlyzed'
Rcas.moblc cffon was made hy fhmily Frrvironmcntal ClotDpliancc Sewiccr, Inc. lo locate t ld -ramplc suspcr:l
malcrialx. llowgver. for rny strtrclurc, thc cristcncc ol'u iquc or coflcealcd csbcstos corttining malcrials and dctris
is a ptssibility, f'anrily F)nvinrnmcntrl dous rxrl rrdt rarrl. *,uirrantcc. or pnrltru to ftavc tlc rbility 1rr louatc or idcnlily
all asbcslos containing mutcrial in thir slruclure.
I have auachrd cqrics <rf the labrxatory rcsulLs ard my ccrliticalir.rn.
Should yru have arry queitions or rcquirc rd.litionol information, plcarc fccl frcc to conlacl Rcnrrnl llrrrlcy or
Sunuef Roff at (30312'ril6il22.
Sinccrcly,
Samrrel Rolf, Asbcsttts Building lnsg*&tr
f amily Environmentrl Complimcc Scrviccs, Inc.
P -O7
-6,
Mar-03-OO OS : z/tP I l5 ne Ck. Rd. RoscnlJuo s7ot6-zess
FAMI LY ANALYTICAI, LABORATORY
-11650 CHR,STNUT PLACE
DENVER, CO 90216
(303) 297-0079
(303)29G6022
l;ebruary 15, 2000
Samuel Kolf
l;alnily Hnvirunrrrntlrl (in11plin46c Scrvices
3650 Chcslnut rrlacc
Denvcr, (:O. t0?16
Rc: Vail-Rcrnr,xlcl
Dear Mr. Rolf:
Anachsd srE lhe rcsulrs of polurizcd Light Micnxr:opy analysas for thc prclicncc of ash:slifonn nrincralrcontaitd in thc bul[ sanrFle orurerials submined o rhis fmility on 0?_i-5-2000.
The mcthods involvcd for this cvalualion includc a rnacmscopic inspcctirm using a srcrcoscopc rolccuratcly dclcrmilrc surlacc phy:iisal pnrpcrties. Any surfacc., inclusion tx <|c$ris dctcctc.l within thcsrtnllc lhd crhibits physical propsnic-r differcnr and unique from thc original samplc submittcrt foraniysis it- rxn-sidcrr"rl a 'l aycr'and, if u:prablc, analyzrd as u singte matcrirt coniributing t1 rhe contcnlo|thc toral samplc. l:ach malerial Ls hen.nslyrtd by polarird fifit m;croscopy (pl.tr,lj ii comptiancewirh rhc guidelincs csrahlishcd by th,, EpA in its tnrerim Mcrft<rd for thc Dctc.rmination of Asbesios in Bulk
liamPlcs as firund in 4(l CFR. Pafl ?63. Subpart F. Appcndix A (EpA/600/R-g3/l t6)- Family Anatyrical
I aboratory ServicL':i' lnc. is currenrly accrcdircrl tirr irulk asucsos analysis hy the Ndional Voluntury
f.!3to-q Agryditation Prqgrum (NVLAP) of thc Nutional lostitutc of Starrrluds and -l cchnology(NtSl). Our NVt .AP trhoratory code oumbcr is 2fitrl4E.
'!t-ugh lhc pmcedurcs noled rbovc. thc srmplc ir iclnnatcd according to homogen€iry ro.l layering and
dte principle fibruus and non'fitrruus comporrcnts in etch sample arc rlrlcrmincd] Thc-filrous conrprrncnls
arc thcn .:llssificd as cirher a^sbeslos or non_ash;ilos and a pcTEcntagc cornJrrsition rarrgc is daennirtut for
cuch asbcstos typc idcntified. A blal asbcstos contcnt for each rutcrial and un onerallTtotal sumptcperccnlugc is thcn calcrrlatcd. Furthu.r cy:luation$ lrc madc to daenninc sizr: and morphoh€y oiaslxstos
matcrials idcnlilicd' l'br idcntification purFrsas, asbcskrs includcs chrysotih. cummingtonlli-g.unerirc(am<xitc). crocidolilc. rr.trx)litc, acrinolite lnd anthophyllitc. Asbesroi 'fibcrs' ere gcierally classified uscrystallinc matcrial, which occurs wilhin in one of tht commcrcial asbcslos caregoril n<{cd abovc. hasphysical dimcnsions krnger lhan .5 micrumatcrs (um), and has a lcngth-todiamcrtr ratio of f to t or grcatcr.
Rcsulls of thcsc evaluations arc lisled in rhc l'ollowing REItRI'OF'TEST RESULTS. Thesc n:sultspcnsin oltly to thc samplei refercnced in this rcJnn a-nd none orher.
This repon is corrtitlcnr ial. Dcrailsof ttris repon will nor be discussed with any pcns{rn or agency nor
rssocialcd with y_ou or your organiiarion. .Ihis reJrcn must be reprodrrccrt in iis entirety unri shail nor bc
copied.io pnrt. lf you-have any lwsfions rcgarding thc comart ui'lhir t"pnn, pleasc call us. lf I'brrrilyAnalylicsl may be (}f funhcr assisl ncc in orher hcihh and sot'cty arcas oiconccrn, plcasc ler us know.
ANAt.Vtilftltypz
Tim Bergquis( (icrrlngisr
stlRvtcEs, lNc.
F. OA
l)lR[:CI()RI.AI]ORATORY
fr&a
'tim Bergquift /
Mar-o3-oo 03:25P rrsrarne ck- Rd- Roscn 97o-5t-2ee3
Family Analytical Lahoralory Scrvicc, lrrc.
Rcport of 'l'cst Rcsults
ltl.M ltrtlk Arlnsltru Annlvsis
(llient & Prr{ccl ll): !.ril-Renrodcl
(irmplctcd: 02-15-00
f .CN: 0fiX17,l0l:4
Al)l)l'llONAL COMMHNTS: All uniquc marcrial layers withiu thl, ssmu samplc arc analyzcd and reportc{ individually and thc
orrcndl / total samFle'/o asbcstos utnlcnt is then dctcrmined and reponed,
ND"Dorrc Or.:tcctcd
l)atc:02/1512000
P-O9
GYPSUM
% Asbeslos Fiber
2 ND
75
Mar-o3-OO 03:25P llsl Juna Ck- Rd- Roscn 9t70-9?6-2993
nuritfanalyticat Laborztory s**t, lu..
Report of Tcst Results
Pl.M llulk Ashcsos Analysis
Clicnt & Pnrir:cl ll); y31jl- Rcn11ntg.!___
(irmplctcd: (,1- | .i-(Xl.
LGN: 0(xx)79 2( rlj.l
Physical
wHrTE
Cemeniirpus
YES
NO
0
YES
FbGr Comct
?6 NorFA sbestos Fibers
ADD|IIONAL COMMFNTS: All unirlur: mareriat hycrs within rhc same sarnpl6 n1g analya;d urxt rsprncd individually and thc
overall / total sanlple ',ro asbcslor content is ticn detcrmined and rcporfut.
ND-f)tne Detccted
Arnlyst: T"* I Dale:02/1.5/2fl)0'l'int llcrgq icroscopist
P- lo
sYF
Lh
o
Asb6stos
%
Mar/.-O3-OO O3:Z5P 1151, June Ck- Rd- Roscn 97o-9t26-29t93
r"riilnnatyticat l,aboratory s"r"i? r n..
Rcport of 'l'est Rc.sutts
Pl.M ltulk Asbcsros Analyers
Clicnt & l'rrrioct lD: ldj!:-Rcqrlldgl-
(Jomplclcd : 02:15:00_.
L(iN: {f0(l{}70lOl.'4
sM-05
P-lf
-s-uirace-'
JOINT
r-ayrh-?--
ORYWALL
6gYo
lSMo6 luyrrrz -lsr"iffi; -Tbniwnr_r_-
I JOINT IIr:oMPourun Il-vfuv.ll{fL
COII'POUND
wHtTE "-Tilrrrril
GvpSUM- T-cemenrffiVFs -
-Tves -YF..T TN6_-!r ._ l0 _YES IYES
96 Asbestos
ADDITIONAL C:OMMI:N'|'S: Alt uniquc materarl hyerc wilhin thc sarnc samplo aru unrlyzcd anrl rcpnrred individually and 0rcoverall / total sample 96 rrsbcstos cont€nt is thcn detormincd and n:porrcd.
ND=Dole Lhkcrcd
-f'{Analyst: /rtq.t Darc:o2/1.5/2(XX)
Mar-O3-OO 03:ZsP r rsrdune ck- Rd- Roscn 970-9t26-29tsts
It
Family Analytical Laboratory Sclicc, Inc.
Rcport of Tcst Results
Pl.M Bulk Ashestos Analysis
(:licnl & Prrt;ccl ll):
(lrmplclrd: lJl-15-00
LGN: 0(l(X179 -l0l14
Vail- llt'mrlrt"'l
CEILING
IFXTURE
AfrDlTlONAl, (l()MMliN l'S: All uniquc matrrial luyers within the *trne sanrple arc srulyzrd anrl rcporl('.I individually rnd thc
ovcrall / total sa rplc y. arbcslos co,nlcnt is then dctennincd arrd rcponcd.
NfFDone Dacctcd
Datc:02/lSl2fiX)
P. L2
Mar-o3-oo ()3:25P I l5l rrc Ck - Rd - Roset.|97o 6-?99t3Juo-92o P- 13
.Sttsto$. fEt, Pc,', 4r. sEl
a|IfaLS aA, J,
^AF.aU',x,'c,ra,|'ioi ltE
"aa
f ,cuLat Es
stE6l a taf Trcl r aLttaS
NV0JAp L E*o.'o,cct'
RrsrnvorRs ETvvmoNMENTAL
Senvrcgs, Inc.
rO, ca^xt SIFEET oENYEn, cotoe^oo urot la/,{,t 3rjrTra lt0i4 no.tw |^x lJ[,ll n -rr,.
February 1'7, 2(,00
Mr. Berir:rrd llurley
Farni Iy Etlvj. ronmen t aJ
Complianr:c: Ije': r'v it:es;, Inc .
3 6 5 O Chcst rrrr l. Pl ace
Denver, C:O ao2'1 6
RE: RES ilob No. 66828-1 - Vail Remodel
and SM-02-VaiI.
Bulk S:emF3.es: SM-OI-Vail
Dear Mr- Hurley :
Reservoi.r$ Euvironmental. Scrvic:er.;, Trrc-'- (RES, lnc. ) tttrs poi nt'
counted two lru'lk nraterial sampics by fr<-rlarized Light Flicroscopy
(PLM) for ersbesLo.':; c:c)llLent as pcr your rcquest: - The samples rrtere
received on !'cbruu r:y ]-6,2000, atld initial rcsull$ were t-elepl:oned
to youf office within 24 horrr.r: cl l' r'ec:t+ipf-. PLM was u:;ed L<) 6na1 yze.
thibltlk materi.rlr J-rr cr.xr;t I ianr:e vrj t:h guidelincs est,.;rl:l i r;]ted by rhe
USIIPA (EPn,/6OO/R -g'l/1.7O. t')re Analyr.icaI RcsuIt-!.: a!'e preselrted i.n
Table r-
RIJS, IDc- has assigincd job rturnl:er IrF:t'; 66828..1 to tltili r.;t..ridy- This
rcport is cor:s:iderEcl hi-ghly corrf idc:ntia] and the solc Proltti?_Ly- of
pairi t y Errvircrnmental . nAS, Inc . wi l. I rr()l- discuss any pirr-|.. of []ris
study- with per.sorurt:l ()t-her t-han tlicrge of the Cl jerrt- - I'he resulEs
deeciibed in this rcport on.l.y ayrPl y !-o the samples analyzed'
Sarnples will be disposed of aLLer' $ixt.y days unlcss Iongcrr $Loritge
is recluer:f.ed. The Us EPA guitlclilre warr developcd f or usc: on
f riable lrrti l.dlng materials .-tnd rr:.-:otnrnend.s the use of addit ional
an4lycer: l.r:r non.friable matcrials 3_rgclr a9 floor tiles. RHli, Irrc.
rccomrnerrcJ,.t ;rrid i.r.ional analyscs to c:r.rrt f j r'nt negative LlLl'1 rcsults on
floor t ilr.:s, T):i l: repor:f- is not to bc lclrroduced. except- in tuII,
withouE. r;5re:r:i I ir: vrriir-etr approval by RESI - 'l'tt.i !; r'eport ttlust not be
used to i:.1 ai m ettclorsement- of product i,t ()r analytical rcsults by
NVJ,AP (.)r arry .ag.rtlcy of thc U.S. (-:ovr'i t t)rnenf.. Only l.' h(r Pl,M
r0i C ros;c-'opy results contaj.ncd in thin r'eport are subj ci(.:L l-o NVIiP
trcr.:red!f-ition, otlrer: intorruri: iOn ;rrr:r;.:rrt:ed is not NVl,Att .'r(:'C.'l:€fditC'd.
Mar-O3-oo O3:25P ll5l Juhe Ck. Rd- Roson
v
s7o-i56-2es3
T I you r.rltr.rttJ.cl lt.tvt: atty qtteJ,l. i r>rn; ,rtrrrtrl l':-;ii3 g1:-'po1'1 . Pl e.-.rrrtr f et: I,
f ree t <.r r:.r | | lnr.r ;.r1. tl30 1986 .
flincert'ly,
' .-f./.fg it...t "+ t (L-''
,,-.,,rrrr* li1.rr.rrtr.:c,r' Orl
Vi r:r+ P rcri i.ctent
RKlt,/sk
fd,,*A A 8l*1"
Analyst- (s) :
Rrett $. Ccrl bert. Pattl D. Lo .'lc:a'l zo
Paul l.'. Krtirp;re T,i.rt Werll tlrrg
P.t4
Mar.-OS-oO ()3:26P 1tst ^Iunc Ck. Rd- Roscn 97o-E 26-299t3
vv
TESERVOIBS ENVIROITIMENTAI SEBVIGES, I'IIC.
NVLAI) Accrcdited Lab 1 llgfi
TNELE I. PLM BUI.K NNNLYSIS, PERCEN'TA(:h (:OMPO$ITION BY POINT COUNT
RES Job Nurnbcr: llts 66EZB-IClienr: Fflrnaly Envttonrnrxrtad
Clierrt Projcct: Vail Ramrxlcl
Dale Sanrgrles Rr:ceivtxl: Fcbrrrory I 6. 2000
Analysis Typu: PLM. Point Cortnt
TurnarouM: 24 llout
P-l5
Client
Samplc
Numllcr
Lab l0Nurntrcr ASBTSTOS ASBI:S'IOS
I AYTIT MINERNL CONTENT
ANALYZED Point
Count
l'Yol
SM.OI Vail
SM O2-Vail
EM 464927
EM 464928
ND
ND
ND - Norrs Dutcctcd Analyst: PDI
I racc -- Asbcstr)s ubserved but rrrt counacd urrder p.riot count prolocol, lcss than O.25%
Mar.-Os-OO O3.26P nc Ck- Rd- Roscrr 970-926-2993]' t5l Juo P. t6
s' l';\
( 'r'
li.r'. ,', !
(.'r.,:.i:r..i
ur. r: iir ri
- -::,i; rt!::i;.r3.'.1 ::. _'.,..'..
r ., r. i, ,-l :- -' r.l r'.
1) 1, 1:r 1l ''r 'r'l : :
r\ S ll l:.S''1. OS
( . I:, It' l'l Ji tCA'1" [( )N
O t. COI".OIII\ l) o
::::i't:t crl' l)rrir!!r-: I lr-:i!! lt
.i':r ir ttt'llttt'tlt
.: (-'o:rlrtil J)ii'i::tirt
: :iities tltril
.'ul. lioll.
lcr. l."'l -:if ';-.'-') |
.. :-'j-.-0'i. (.'.li 5-''1i1'l "\:r' (.)ri:'riiii'
'.. i l\o. ii. l': Lr't ii' :rl:r'! :": l:ulr''l)1'
..: ,lr'r irt 1!1c' iir!io'.r it::1 tii'rr:ii:lil:r':
; INSP l1(- l'( ) li '
,_/) .4,
(-X.r',., !-lY
"i)rn-!,-\
-
",,t'..,,
;',i':'iiii!i' ;': r'''rt'ri' r'
.,. :r :,':f ),t'., ,t,:,.j t:;:rrt:t '!!ll!;.'l t;t:6|e"';'i1'"1 'r 'i:" t::'t:Pl;,:''
Best
coPY
Available
I
I
I
_l
Mar-OS-OO 03:ZsP 1]'5l Juna Ck. Rd. Roscno
P.O. Bor 1!45
Ad\OOff6A0
P|EEglDdSOe
Fsg,r0$&2r|
97A-926-2993o P-Ot
Farr
J, F, Mona Fr BdtLqiE
rfs- +n- AqB +_,,- lA
rG fyynr ln*lqor cc:
trtlrd or-K'{*,o-', fl-,wr fllbf-td.
€ornrtE
q
ll
rrj Tav {un
f'trb ,4SLyelo> [h1auL,
fharlt yw
a- ink n'an
{r* ltlo, *l
&wahh'o'w
We adoi'+
f vna],
F{lnt Mlt woln 4t't'1'/ (arcshbus'
I budtv 5'rb'd' &o*' aur (onvovgt*'au s
/Aot ft'> lxr*ti* wi/ | tx Qtu i/ehte'
al4 /,tot"lo7' ?'0'a 1'7u bts Yo'
futL ,yte ,-
_/a_, kS
ff :trt..'
1a:13 osal666
tf
Date
Attention
Company
Telephone
Fa:r
From
Subject
Message
MONROE NEI4ELL
Monroe & Newell Engineersr luc.
70 Benchmark Road, Suitc 204
Avon, Colorado 81620
970t949-776E 9701949405t1Fax
E-mail: avon@monroe - ge-we_l 1 . com
FACSMILE TRA].ISMITTAL LETTER
C rLrAee Pages (including tansmittal)
.e>, L.q,t|.lE,,AFc,t+ffHf
PAGE 67/42
2
HE|sTqL
Vorc*vevl, cqls .'b*+A€€oc-.
7eus"1.?_ rerephone 111t I *grec=
3 Fax 147qag 1fi,1335
R:,Project * 42:ll
StcLc>->Ett:
1z"E"llcfi> gfpUsfUp+L
?s : Ca-"P tt xlsfto['.*t/
U.G
AorLS Erlat{=ry_
If transmittal is not as indicated please notifi sender
A6/t7/2AAE 18:1.3)t
0
n#\til\
a66A6AA MONROE NEIdELL
Jos
SHE6T NO,
CALCUTATED IY
PAGE A2/42
Co-Zo, @
Monroe & NeweII.*--Ettg)rcers, Inc.
OF
CHECKEO BY
DATE
DATE
Oct-12-OO 02: IOPlltf LEI'$ua lb:'j /1151 J.rne Ck -
vwDqac
Rd. Ro.sen 970-9?6-2993ro.RG f€€r
Ivloruoe & Newellliqgmr" h.
Ocbb€r 10,2000
Bctblcvinc, Architoct
POBox lE25
Arao't CO 81620
AItn:Ms. Bclb l,eeinc
mig Rcsidatc" (M&tt#lt2s)
Dar Ms l-arinc:
Ths :ltuctwrl &uaing of tho ebow rcoddc u/$ obscwcd by Moroe & Ncu'ell
EoefuFcsr, lnc- duing coDstntdion"
ft ir onr opinion, brscd oo our linitcd vinrd obrorerrioot, 6l tc fiuing of tb
raridcrcc is coosarrrcd subrU1ially io coryliose with thc inlo of tbc coortuction
locrncnts pcptod by ogr ofhcc. To rhc bcst of orr lcnowledgg rny dcfcieucics foqod
Arhg onr obccwrrior hrw bcco conctcd
lf pu hrrc ry qlrc3tiotu or coellcnts, plcere cdl-
Vcry|nily1.oms,
MOT.IROE & MUIELT ENOINEERS, INC-
vr,l, Colenlo
Drn'cr. Coaorrdo
Dlltot . C('l.rr.do
r -uzpAG€ a6/84
Rr:
/.-L*l fu'
CbirlopbSp.clr
Elginccr
70 ncnche,ir& Xgaat . Suit< 20{ . p.O. Box ltgr . Avon. ColorrdD B1620(.976t 9a9.776a. PeX (9lO) g4g-alta. .inril: rvooamonr.)€- -.r*rltt.(o.t
0C.[ t 8 7'1;lq;
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FROIiflTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 8L657
970 -479 -2L38
APPLICAIiTT
EONTRA TOR
OWNER
.fob Address:
LocaE,ion. . . :
Parcel No..:Project No.:
NEW ELECTRIC INC,
P O BOX 957, AVON CO
NEW ELECTRIC INC,
P O BOX 957, AVON CO
ILLIG CLIFF
11504 Pawnee Circle,
706 FOREST RD
705 FOREST RD
2L0r-072-LL-022
PRJo0-0042
8L620
8L620
Leawood KS 662LL
Status...: ISSUED
Applied..: 04/24/2000
Issued...: 04/25/2000
E>cpires - . : LO/22/2000
Phone t 970-949-465L
Phone:. 970-949-465L
DEPARTME}CT OF COIWI]NITY DEVELOPMEI{:T
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON .]OBSITE AT AIL TTIIES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT PermiE #: E00-005L
DCSCTiPTiON: ELECTRIC FOR PRIMARY/SECONDARY ValuaLi-on:5, 000 . 00
Elecbrical---> 90.00
DRB Fee .0O
Investigation>
Will Ca11-- -- >
.00
3 .00
TOTAT, FEIS- - - > 93.00
IEem: 05000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMEIfI DepE: BUILDING Divisi-on:
O4/24/2OOO KATHY ACTiON: APPR APPROVED PER.KWIEbM'. 05600 FIRE DEPARITVIEN'I DEPE: FIRE DiViSJ-ON:04/24/2000 KATHY Acrion: APPR N/A
FEE S!'I4!'ARY
Totsal Calculated Pees- > 93.00
Additional Feeg--- ------> .00
TotaL Permit Fee----- ---> 93-OC
Payltrenl6- __ _-- -
BAT.ANCE DUB .OO
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIEI,D INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
DECI,ARATIONS
I hereby acklowledge !hat' I have read thig appLication, filled out in full tshe infofltraeioE required, conPleted an accuratc PLol
p1an, and slaE.e thac all che information provided as required is correct - I agree to co$ply *ith the infontration and pfot p1an,
tso comply lriEh all Tonn ordinances and stace lawE. and to build t.hiB stsruccure according to che Town's zoning and subdivision
codes, desj,g?! revierr apploved, Unifon Building code and otshe! ordinances of che Town aPPlicable therelo.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SBALT, BE MADE 1$?ENTy-FOriR HOnRS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-213e OR AT OttR OFFICE FROM g:00 AI4 5:00 Ptl
+rl+ *rr* *rl * rl* * rl* * +ta tl I * * * f* * ** ** I ** ait *rl* * t ** * rt * *:* ** * rrt ** * * * ** *tt * *t
TO!{II OF VAIL, COIORADO Statennt
*t***********+********it*t*i*********l*******************+i**f ***
Statemnt Nuober: REc-0520 Amount: 93-OO 04/25/00 09:34
Palment [ethod: 28560 NotaElon: NEW EIrEqfRIc Init: iIN
Pennit No:
Parcel No:
site Addr.ess :
Location 3
I'his Payment
. TotaL Feee:
93.00 Total ALLr Pmts:
800-0051 Type: B-ELEC EITEqIRICAIT PER!,IIT
2L0L- O7 2-]-L- O22
705 FORBST RD
7O5 FORE T RI)
93.00
93 .00
.00Balance:
*t*!r*****t**t*****t**t******t****t**i******t******t************+
Account code Description
EP OO1OOOO3111-4OO BI,ECTR,ICAI, PERUIT FEES
wc 0010000311.2800 !{rlr cArJL rNspEcTroN FEE
Anount
90.00
3 .00
AppLrcATroNe[. no, BE AccEprED rF rNcoMprErj* rn*
Project #:
Building Permit #:
mwvwvAn
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657 PnauL#arc/* o7a- // - oea,
Electrical Permit #: qC)6. Octsl
97 O- 47 I - 2149 ( Inspections)
Conbd Asrcsorc Office at 97O-328-864O or visit for Parcel #
Parcel # (Required if no bldg. permit # is provided above)
rob Name: -Tl/_a'6 'tbrrl1e rob Address: 7,/"d#TT r?n"
Legal Description Lot:q Block: /,"ti^sYf,f1fa 6.6, ffi suoaiuirion,
owners NametCLttF zLLlh 11mdress:f f;ou{*Wffi? "?frl.lonon (qn\-41|-/6 67
Engineer:Address:Phone:
Detailed description of work: p4a4iAUa-erv;efua Eev iec=
/Z,qoM- oF uatt-f,- ,+Po uP42G' oF
WorkClass: New() Addition( ) Remodel ffi Repair( ) TempPower( ) Other( )
Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Aotn [{Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No X)
Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) Duplex P{ wutti-famity ( ) Commerciat ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: a No. of Accommodation Units in this buildinq:
Is this permit for a hot tub: Yes ( ) frfo bd
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes bQ No ( )#STr^o'.^ll Ooes a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No X
COMPLETE SQ. FEET FOR NEW BUITDS and VALUATIONS FOR AtL OTHERS (labor & Materials)
ELECTRICALVALUATION: $ €, ooo, ooAMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE:
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Electrical Contractor:
r{Eu a-ecZzic, -%)e .
Town of Vail Req. No.:i/o€ -Contact an/ Phone #'s:HH Qzo) qvq- </65 /
Contractor Signature: q-. /r/l_ ])/Lbte..,
****t *.t*****r.**'t*****rr***********i!**r.*'rFOR OFFICE USE ONLY**********rrrr****************-r********
F:/everyone/forms/elecperm
o
U
tr
o
f
o
Amendment to the 1999 N.E.C. Town of VailOrdinance 10-1-6,
Overhead services are not allowed in the Town of Vail.
Underground services have to be in conduit (PVC) from the transformer to the electric meter,
switch and to the first electrical distribution circuit breaker panel.
The main disconnect switch shall be located next to the meter on the exterior wall of the
main disconnect
structure easily
accessible.
All underground conduits are required to be inspected before back-filling the trench.
In multi-family dwelling units, no electrical wiring or feeder cables shall pass from one unit to another. Common
walls and spaces are accepted.
NM Cable (Romex) is not allowed in cor:nmercial buildings or structures exceeding three (3) stories.
No use of aluminum wire smaller than size #8 will be oermitted with the Town of Vail.
TOWN OF VAIL ELECTRICAL PERMIT GUIDELINES
All installations of exterior hot tubs or spa's require a DRB approval from planning. This application will
not be accepted without a copy of the DRB approval form attached (if applicable).
If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on a new elevated platform or deck over
30" above grade, you must also obtain a building permit.
If this permit is for installation of an exterior hot tub or spa on any existing deck or elevated platform,
a structural engineer must review the existing condition and verify that it will support the added
concentrated load. Please provide a copy of the structural engineers wet stamped letter or drawing
with this application.
If this is a remodel in a multi-family building with a homeowners association, a letter of permission
from the association is required.
e If this permit is for a commercial space, two (2) sets of stamped drawings are required.
I have read and understand the above.
If you have any questions regarding the above information or have additional questions,
pf ease contact the Town of Vail Electrical Inspector at97O-479-2L47. The inspector can be
reached on Tuesday, Thursday and Friday mornings between the hours of 8am and 9am. You
may also leave a voice mail and the inspector will call you back.
HCW DID WE RATE WTTH YOU?
Town of Vail Survey
Community Development Department Russell Fonesl Darector,
(970) 47e.213e
Check allthat applies.
1. Which Departnent(s) did you contact?
Building _ Environmenhl_ Housing_ Admin
Planning _DRB rtrL
2. Was your initial contact wiih our stafiimrnediate_ dow _or
no one available ?
3. lf you were required to waii, how long was ii before you were
helped?
4.Was your prolect reviewed on a timely basis? Yes / No
lf no, why no0
Was this ycur first time b file a DRB app_ PEC app
Bldg Permit N/A
Please rate $e performance of the staff person who assisted you:
54321Name:
(kncwledge; responsiveness, availability)
Overall efiectiveness ofthe Front Service Counter. 5 4 3 2
What is the best time of day for you to use the Front Service
Counter?
9. Any comments you have which would allow us to beter serve you
nexttime?
Thank you for taking the time to compleG this survey. We are
commited b improving ou service.
7.
R
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FROI TAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81557
970-479-2L34
Plurbing-----> 330.00
Plan Check- -- > 42.54
InvestsigaEion>
WilI call---->
.00
3.00
DEPARTMEIiII| OF COMMT]NITY DEVELOPMEI(|
NOTE: THfS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE
PermitPLI]MBING PERMIT
AT ALL TIMES
#: P00-0021
OhINER ILLIG CLIFF
l-1504 Pawnee Circle, Leawood KS 6621-l-
COIiTTRACTOR CONCEPT MECHANIEAL, INC
P.O. BOX 11-65, AVON, CO 81-620
APPLICA.I{T CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC.
Phone:. 970-949-0200
DCSCTiPTiON: RE-ROUGH DWV,hIATER TO BATHS,NEW GAVAIUATiON:,/21,500.00
FEE SUI4I4ARY
ilob Address:
Localion. . . :
Parcef No,.:Project No.:
705 FOREST RD
706 FOREST RD
2LOL-072-tL-022
PR,Jo0-0042
status. .
Applied.
Issued. .
Expires.
Total calculated FeeB-_- >
Adaitsional Fees- -------- >
ISSIIED
04/1,3 /20Oo
04/2s /2000
10 /22 /2000
ResglraranE Plan Review- - >
AOTAIJ FEES.. - - -
415 -50
.00
accurate plo!
and plot plan,
sulrdiwision
8:0O AM 5:00 PM
. oo
415 .5 0
Total Permit Fee-_------> 415.5O
Paymen!s------- 415 -5o
BAI,INCE DUE . OO
rtem: 05100 BUILDING DEPAR1MENT Dept: BUTLDING Division:
04/1"3/2000 KATHY Action: APPR APPROVED PER-KWi€am;' o5eoo- r'ins DEPARTT{EM! DepE: F1RE Division:
04/L3/2000 KATI{Y Action: APPR APPROVED PER-KW
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CIIECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.
DECTARATIONS
I he-eby acknolrledge lhag I hawe iead this application, filLed out in full the information required, comPleEed an
p1an, and state thaC all the inforltlacion provided as required is corlect. I aglee co conply *iEh the infoftagion
OF OWNBR OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF A.AID OWNER
Lo coEply t{ith aI1 Toen ordinanceg and staLe lays, and to buiLd this sErucbure according !g,e-tt--""i.*.-3<oning and
codee, desigrr revies approwed, Uniforn Building code and other oldinances of the Town ?dticable theteLr.,/-"/ -aRBeuEsrs FoR rNspEcrroNs smr,L BE MADE TwEMry-FonR HoURs rN ADVANCE By 'rrynip:c'aNEr^\: ,{7 9 - 2 13's oR AI'guR oFFrcE FRoM
rt***a**i**t*******r'*t**t*i**a*i*ta******atl*********t*l******t*
fO!{N OF VAIL, COLORADO statenme
iit***l****lt ta !tt* *tt***t*****11!t*t*t**t**tt******tl*************t
statenmt Nunber: REC-0620 Amount: 415'50 04/25/00 ]-5?25
Pa)meng ltetshod: 5548 Notation: CONCEP! MECHANIC hit: JN
Permit No: Poo-0o21 Type: B-PLMB PLUUBING PERI'IIT
Parcel No: 2101-o?2 -LL'o22
SiIe A dTCES: ?O6 FOREST RD
L,ocatsio[: ?05 FORBST RD
Thi6 Pa)menc
Total Fees:
4l-5.5o TotaL A]JL Pmta:
Balance :
415.50
415 .50
.o0
t * a t * ** t ** * ** *'l* * t il * * * * * ** * * * * !l * + I *l + i * t * a t * * * * + * * * f *t * t * * :t * * * *t
Account Code Deecription llmounE
PP o01o0oo31112oo PLIjI'BING PER!'!IT FEES 330 ' 00
pF OO1OOO031123OO PlAri[ CHECK SEES a2'5O
wc oor-oooo31128oo I{ILL CALL INSPEqTION FE8 3'0o
npF 13 OO Ol:33P ConcePt llechenical, Inc. (g?OJ 9{9-O3OO P'"
ApR-rs-eo tr:23 FRor.ror-"fo"r-o"rr. ,o'"""a""..f ,,AGE r/3
l*l,
L\l I
L.'''''''':^'!,
avrf a, wt aaYua
75 S Fronbg: RC.
Vdf Colredo &1657
AppucArroar wtLL lroT 8E AccEpTEo tlr nlcoilPtErE oR,
Pnrjcct t:
numiltg Pemltf:
97!-.?9--(IFecdoc)
Igutugf VAIL PLU
co]IPtErt vALltATro[f FoR Pl'l']llmc Prltlrr (ltoor r raetbts)
2/rt
(Wr@zt tY'Blt #
f
:oonaes TO$A/.
u.*,0.-t*t- lt* ? t*, I lairnjArlltil&64rslq{,"l!{Il----:
Erq'/*n NIA -Nts'-FaU)N[,k S Odzt t I aIfne:
F*
wbilrlrF< r{€$( ) ^{qg{] _ rFrduo"@
@ns luilding: W 1./lttr,.otA@.rr,trtlitbounitshdtisbuikfng: O
rro 0C,_
PlJrlglt\tg: f Zl,5@9
F/fiFt/E ttt pat!$pt'|tt
coilTR^Cton rilForrATraltl
77at ffn''i'qfr-az@aatqzl
npF l3 oo o1:33P Concept, l'lechanical r Inc. (S7OJ S+S-O3OOta P. r
MESSAGE:
Hr. fte,* b dtu\- pltmbiS P'rt't^^'+
utrflicafirru *1^ h'* iob' ry J'nera/
(pnilDc{2. u B"rA iru-'+"a'U'nt'
Tt(t h, +wtr,,ryfir ry-ryL.6xrn";f :'+ouru, b,r#'h,&t/ h T''*\L %,hwf /ogs eabl, boitm Buru'- /"#"-'ftek'Un',fleat.e oA/( n/v a-t (V?-ozt; 4"W,*
knorrt ft"z ft'e ,fi' +7.1"/4
Wr'nlf
';l;^,qr^fuA f7^*4 fu \F
Concept Mechanicalr Inc'
#H;1
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
DArE: ?t'/Z -AO us, Tlltg Reude/
ro: faautf l/nu FAX: W?'2492
coMpANy t (oant.l2dtr-PAcEsroFollow: I
FRoM: Ti nt(ate,l
dait
thb llrrinilc tnngnirrio it lttt|rdd r.r uc rors urrEE ". -.- ."-'-Er-.JLrra
Ln. yqr .tr brlby ncifod $lr ny *o
:fr#l;;ruff5;mtg.ffitry;5J;l-,u fr i* r.....orv. pe*r'c ri v''
hrgr...durd rbir trnrnirio b enr, y'aso di0 ur.brdi'dy Dy t;;-i-;itOi ruorm tta-ol ot" cixi-t
rr.r-r;rri- to ro l6c rboE rd.F ty dun Dl' TDnx yt'll
--
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 8L657
970-479-2L38
DEPART!,IENT OF COMMIJNITY DEVEI,OPMENT
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON i'OBSTTE AT
MECHANICAI., PERMIT PETMiE #:
NOTE: TTIIS AIJIJ TIMES
M00-0088
Job AddresEi. . . z 706 FOREST RD
Location......: 706 FOREST RD
Parcel No..... : 2L01-072-LL-022
Project Number: PR,l00-0042
APPLICAIiIT CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC
P.O- BOX 1"165, AVON, CO
CONTRAETOR CONCEPT MECIIANICAI, INC
P.O. BOX r.165, AVON, CO
TO4AL PEES. - - -.
ISSI'ED
08 / 02 /2ooo
09 /t4 / 2000
03 /L3 /200L
Phone z 970-949-0200
Phone: 97O-949-O200
2L,2OO.O0
l+of wood/P6llct:
553 .00
Total P€ruit Fec-------->
Status. .
Applied.
Issued..
E>qrires.
8L620
8L620
OWNER ILLIG CLIFF
11504 Pawnee Circle, L,eawood KS 66211
Descripts j-on: ValuaEion:
NBW BOILER FOR BASEBOARD HEAT,INSTAI,L HWIDTFICATN
Fl,r.pl.cc Infornetlonr R.6trictsed: Y lfof cla6 Applianccg:*of ctaF Log6:
PEE SU}'MARY
Machrnical - -- >
PIan ch6ck- -- >
Inv.sligatsion>
RcsCurrant Plan ReviGtf-- >Total calculatcd F6Gr- - - >
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
4{0.00
1,10.00
.00
Additional Fcc€------ ---> .oo
.00
Will call----> 3.oo P.yocnba------- 553.oO
BATANCB DrrB- - - - ,/5i'.\t
ttrtrtrttrttt*t
ITCM: O51OO BUIIJDING DEPARITVIENT DEPT: BUILDING DJ-ViSiON:08/02/2000 KATHY Action: NOTE ROIIIED TO CI4'RLIE
08./LO'/2OOO CHARLIE ACt,iON: APPR SEE CORRE TIONSribm;'05600 Fine DsplRTt4ENT Dept: FrRE Division:
O8/O2/2OOO KATITY Action: APPR N,/A
FIELD INSPE
INSTAI-,I,ATIOINSTAI-,I,ATION MUST CONFORM TO ITANI'FATO CIIAPTER 10 OF THE 1997 TMC, CHAP
ea,s -apFr, ralreBs - sniilil fi 6 -vrffEb fc-ConolhG - t6- ctnptEfl- 6 AND'
SIIALL TERMINATE AS SPECIFIED IN SEC,8O5 OF THE 1997 TJMC, OR
BOILERS SIIAIL BE ]
UNLESS LISTED FOR
OF THE 1997 IMC.
NONCOI,IBUSTIBLE CONST.BLE FLOORING.
FLOORS OF NON
ON COIIBUSTIBLE5. DRAINAGE OF MECHANICAL
SUPPLY BOII,ERS SIIAIL BE
CONTAINING HEATING OR HCIT-VIATER
PPED WITTI A FLOOR DRAIN PBR SEE.
TO22 OF THE L997 I'MC, OR oN 1004.6 0F THE 1997 rMC.
********************************************************************************
DECI,ARATIONS
f hcrcby acknoiledgc lhag I have read bhi! application, filled ou! in full thc inforuation rcquired, cooplctcd an acculat'c plots
1.2.
3.
4.
5.
FIELD INSPEETIONS ARE REQUIRED TO
INSTAI-,I,ATION MUST CONFORM TO MANU
IRED TO CHECK FOR CODB COMPI,IANCE.TO ITANI'FAETURES INSTRUSTIONS AND
TMC. CHAPTER 10 OF THE 1997 IMC,
NTED AEEORDING TO CHAPTER 8 AND
plan, .nd ltrts! tshrt dl tshq infonlation provid.d as rqquircd iE corr.ct. r agree tso cdtrrly vlfh tshc lnforrrtiqr .nd plot plan,
tso cdlr1y rl.tsh all ToIn ordinanccr lnd rlaEe lars. and Eo bulld ChLa atruccurc according to the Tom'a zonlnE and subdiwiaion
cod.E, d.oign r.n'i!r rpprov.d, Itniforr Building cod. |nd othar ordinqnc.. of thc fo|.n .pplicablc Charclo.
RBQITESTS FOR ITSPBCTIOHS SHAIJL BB I|ADE Ii|EIITY-FOUR HOITRS
SIoNATT'RB OF OWNER OR CIICIITRACTOR FOR HIUSE'JF AID ONNER
Al OlrR OFFICE FRO$I g:o0 .All 5:00 Pu
!7
**t*****t****l**rrit*ir*t*ra*ttti********rrr****t****t****i*r*t*
TOI{N OF VArr,, COI,oR.ADO Statemnt
***tt**t*r*****tt*tt*t******tt**t*ll****rl***+**!t***********i**i***
gtatemnE Number: REC-0677 Anount :5s3.0o 09/L4/OO 13129
Palment Method: CK Notation: *5145ICONCEPT ItlE Init: Lc
Permlt No: M00-OO8a Type: B -li[BCH II{ECHANICAL PERMIT
Parcel No: 2101-072 -tf-O22
Site Address: 706 FORBST RD
Location: 706 FOREST RD
Tota1 FeeB t
553.00 Total ALL Pmte:
Bal-ance :
t**t****ll*****!t*t*rll*ll.1**:t********t*****ilt:lat**il*t*ttt**r*tir*t**
Account code DeBcriptsion
This Payment
553.00
553.00
.oo
Amount
440.00
110.00
3.O0
MP OO1OOOO31111OO MECIIANICA], PERMIT FEES
PF OO1OOOO31123OO PLAN CHECK FEES
IlC OO1OOOO31128OO WILL CAIJII INSPECTION FBE
tD ' 9704792452 PAGE 2/ 3APR- l3-OO I I ' 23 FROM: TOV-CO!i!-DEV-DEPT.
mwxopytn
75 S. Frontaqe Rd-
Vail, @lorado a1557
97 O 47 9- rB (Intpcctions)
Permit will not be accepted withoui ihe following:
Provide uecftanical Room tayorrt drawn to scale to indude:c l,ledran ical Room Dimeni<xrs.J combustion Air Duct Size and Locationi: Combudon Air Duct Size ancl l€tiono Flue, Vent and Gas Une Size and Locatiooc Heat Loss Calcs"
= Equipment Cut/spec Sheets
Conbct ,,tlry Aitu at gzo-gz&-8&O aryisit for hrel S
no b6g. permit# isprovidedabove) ZtO /OZZ
Job r,fame: E//r'4 RC444il4 robAddress: Wy$.*
Fitirct t,v.64
Address: Leooraod. la &ztt
:'?"#hfriffitr!h6;1i*?/tu;'dt
WorkGass: l€w( ) Additton( ) nteratonlJ Rqair( ) Otfrer( )
Soiler Locatlon: tntenor (d) B<terior ( ) Ottre. ( )Does an EHU odsr at :his tocadon: ves ( ) t\tc
Type of Bkl-o; Sngefamity ( ) Dupler ( ) r'-{ti-,.ari,iy ( ) Conrnerciat ( ) Rsauranr ( ) O$.r
No. of Exisiing Dt^€lling UniB in this building:No. of Acmrnmodation lJnits in this building:
No/TypeofFireplacesProposed:GasAppliarrces.( ) GasLogs( ) wood/Pelteril woodBumlng(NOTALLOWED)
I5 this a cotwersion from a wqod to an EPA Phase II derrce? Yes ( ) No
CoHPLETE VALUATIoN FOR MECHANICAL PERMTT (r.abor& Materrats)
******** L*x***t*******.**FOR OFFICE USE ONLy*+*16********+**t* **********
b.t
**
rr|ctro
f -2i
\o eeP'%tanlP
Town Of Varl Reo. No-:,c.-^/8?+
F:/crrcrFnc/fur|3/madrFcrm
RECDoCT022000
CONCEPT MECHANICAL,
PLUMBING . HEATING . SYSTEM DESIGN
P.O. BOX l165 AVON, COLORADO 81620
September 2E,2000
Town of Vail CommunityDevelopment
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail. CO 81657
Timothy J. Rosen, P.E.; V.P./Searctary
Concept Mechanical, Inc
Encl.
Cc: Beth Levine, Architect
Bruce Norring Project
PHONE: (970) 949-0200 FAX: (970) 949"0300
,^w
rD
Jaj"'6 DKK
5{oo/W
\.)
RE: Illig Residence; 706 West Forest Road; Parcel #2101-072'll-022
Vail, Colorado
To Whom It IVtay Concem:
For the record, due to increased snowmelt area as requested by the Owner of this project,
we will be installing two Lochinvar B#ZSO boilers (or equal) each at 250,000 Btuh
input at sea level. These boilers will be si and venting and combustion alr
requirements will be per manufacturer's
enclosing a cut sheet on this boiler.
These boiler selections supersede those
to the Town of Vail-
and code stipulations. I am
as outlined in my July 31., 2000 letter
Please call with any questions or comments. Thank
Superintendent, Beck and Associates, [nc'
Elficicnryi Boiler Dimengions & Specificotions
s r/6'
150,000 t26,m0 lt r11i
RECDoCT022000
{
tn 15 rfi6:
o rrTre'l- o
06
at1+'I o -
o
199199 t68,000 13 Ihr-I V,i l9 rl,16:
8il250 250,000 2t0,000 nh(l0 rtlf 23q(
Emm m,000 25Lm 3l ttf 258llt/(231 (
l,lote 'N' equals Nah/nl G4.': Change 'N' to ,L'Iot LquA pr\rprv
Air inu dirneLsiens quab tent dizneer
Stondcrd Jcrlurot:
. Bumer Flame Observation Pon
. High Efficiency Stainless Steel Bumers
. Two-Stage Firing (M9)
. Two Adjustable Operators (High and Low
Firq M9)
. Fixed High Limit
. Hot Surface Ignition
. Terminal Strip
. Gasket-less Heat Exchanger
. 30 PSI Prcssure Relief Valve
. Pump Relay
. Galvanized Steel lacket
&iler &sign ceiified by
A.G.A. as hot water boilers
l0r boifi mtural oas and
prcpane oas.
. Conventional Vent Increaser
. Air Inlet Cover
. ASME Certified to 160 PSI rVorking Pressure
. National Board Certified
. AGA Design Cenified for Closet Installation
Oplionol Equiprnent:
. Veftical Direcr venting-50 equivalent feet
r Horizonal Dfuect Venting-50 equivalent fee
. Multi-Stack Frame (see accessories section)
r Low l7ater CutOff (probe type)
. Row Switch
. Manuai Reset High Limit
. Pump Delay Switch. Intermittent Pump
. Alarm Bell
. Indoor/Outdoor Control
lld.tro?L
txt50
Efrrryfu l& fotudGo tpt
Thh is a 15O,Un BTU tatural gw
Elkk t y+ biht.
ti.S. and forvign pEnlt pluiing.
(
momo€r
-vlgEna
frilnchirrrar
High Efficiency Water Hcaters Ard Boilers
The Builrln Advantaee
lochinvar Corporation . Nashville, TN 37210 . 615/W..W/F^X 615/854403
All models comply with
ASME Boiler Press!re
Vess€l Code, Section lV,
160 psiwo*lng pressure
and reorslered wilh lhe
NationalBoafd.
(D
Yj,/
Canadian Gas Associalion
PraS S-oo42.
fn oo - ooSECONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC.
PLUMBING . HEATING . SYSTEM DESIGN
P.O. BOX 1165 AVON. COLORADO 81620 PHoNE: (970) 949-0200 FAX: (970) 949-0300
July 31, 2000
Town of Vail Community Development
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
RE:Illig Residance; 706 West Forest Road; Pu:cel#2101-072-ll-022
Vail Colorado
To Whom It May0oncern:
I have completed my heat loss calculations for this prqiect. The heat loss for this home is
approximately 65,lt} Btuh. My calculations are based on 70 F interior temperature at all
house zones, 50 F interior at the garage, and a -20T exterior design temperature.
This is an existing home (secondary unit), which is being converted to a gas-fired boiler
system from electric heat. We will be instatling two Teledyne Laars boile_rs each rated at
'iZS,OOO Btuh (sea level input) to heat the home (nine zones of baseboard), provide
"n.igy
for domestrp hot water prottuction via two 80 gallon storage tanks, antl prodile
energy for project snowmelt.
There will be two 4' diameter type'8" flues installed sideways. Combustion air will Ae -'9t
two 14" wide x Stigh tfucts--cne high anal one low pYr code. Enclosed withtlislett€r
are our mechanical pirmit application and a schematic layout of the boiler room'
Please call with ar.ryquestions or conunents. Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Timothy J. Rosen, P.E.; V.P./Secretary
Concep Mechqnicd, Inc
Encl.
Cc: Chris Meister, Tro,iect Superintenilert; Beck and Associates, Inc.
To.vn olYail
;;": ,;: COPY
fficDAUG022000
CONCEPT MECHANICAL, INC.
PLUMBING . HEATING . SYSTEil DESIGN
PO. Box 1165 Avon, Colorado 8l620
Phone: (970) 949.0200
Far: (970) 949-0300
SHEET I.IO.
-oF
f
OATE
"^!trH CALCULATEO BY
CHECKED BY
SCALE I
C PBODUCT2OT
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
vArL. co 81657
970-479-2138
ou*'rr,r*T oF coMrv^rN,r" ouur.o'ilu,
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Pcrmit #: A00-0034
Job Address: 706 FOREST RD VAIL Status . . . : ISSUED
Location.....: 706 Forest Rd Applied. . : 10/18/2000
Parcel No...: 210107211022 Issued. . : I li0ll2000
Project No : f €-Soo - ooqz- Expircs . .: 0413012001
OWNER ILLIG, CLIFI'ORD w. & BONNIE 70/l.8/2000 Phone:
11.504 PAWNEE CR
I-,EEWOOD KS
662TT
CONTRACTOR THUL EIJECTRONIc SYSTEMS LA/i8/2000 Ptrone: 970-949-4638
P O BOX 534
AVON, CO
8L620
License : l- l-2 -S
APPLICANT THUI, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS IO/L8/2OOO PhONC: 970-949.4638
P O BOX 534
AVON, CO
8r620
Desciption: Install low voltage smoke detectors and panel
Valuation: $ l -000.00
FEE SUNIN,tARY *********t*tr*'**if*t:t**rt'***:!:.*****)t'tra*****l'**'*:*t!)t'rr**'l*'******rt
Electrical-----:-
DRB Fce--->
Invostigati on->
will call->
TOTAL FEES-->
Total Calculated Fees->
Additional Fees----->
Toial Pemrit Fee--->
Palmenls-------->
BALANCE DLE._-.>
ss0. o0
90.00
so-00
93.O0
s53 , OO
50.00
553. OO
$s3. oo
90.00
Approvals:IEem: 05000 ELECTRICAI DEPARTMBII
Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMEIfl|
l0/3L/2000 tmraugtran Action: AP
LL/0r/2000 460 Action: AP first attempt to issue failed in sierra
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
*ffi;;*| ****:i:i*rt**t(*'*:i"'i)t+'r)t*tt)t***'t*'i*'t******r'***
I hereby acknorvlcdge that I have read this application. filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and
state that a1l the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town
ordinances and state larvs, and to build this structure according to thc towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved,
Uniform Building Code and other ordinances ofthe Torvn applicable thereto.
REQr,'ESTS FOR TNSPECTION sl{ALL BE MADE'IWENTY-FOUR IIOI,'RS IN ADVi\r\CE BY TELEPIIONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OIJR OFFICE FROIvt 8:00 AM - 5 PM.
--'\ =--{t-2*{-\ V
L SIGNAUJRE OF OWNER OR CONTRA.CTOR t'OR HiMSELF AND OUAIE
+*********++*******{.*******{.*+******** **,t**************+****+**********)t************+*******
TOWN OF VAIL, COLOMDO Staremenr
*. **,r *** **** * ir * +* ***** *** * ** * **** *** **** !* * * ** * * ** ******* f** * * *** * ***** * *** * * ** *****'f *** * * ****
statement Nuriber; R000o00150 Amount: $53.00 r1/oL/2olooa:24 pM
Pa).ment Method: Check Init: JMN
NoEation: THIIJ EITECTRONICS
Permit No : A00 - 003a fype : AITARI'| PERUTT
Parcel No: 2L0L072LI022
S1te Address: 706 FOR-EST R! VAIIr
Location: ?06 Forest Rd
Total- Fees: 553.00
Thie Payment; 953.00 Total ALL Pmts: $53.00
Balance: S0.00
**** '1.*++ ** {t* ** * **,} **** * ** * ** * * *. ** *:}*********{. '} *:F** ** *r. d.***** * +* ** +*:}* * *** *:t** * ***+++** + *****
ACCOI.INT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descriotron Current Pmts
EP OO1OOOO31i14OO TEMPORARY POt^lER PERMITS
t,\ic OO1OOO()31i28OO WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE
50.00
3. 00
ri;- ;b ;llllr i tns;51,;+'l.i*n Regue*t ttep&rti nS
.-, .,1r-AlL._S.CI,_-_lc!1',$.(}r -,
l'4aqu:s *xi l*tllract mrte; fl,ursdny. .:rll9 1ii, 2i)0'l
Ar:lured ! c.: CDAWS
trcs $rt"c.J6tr lype; BLDG
ll ii{ r, L'c;i(rn i\reir; CE
f lrni ,lddress: TtlS f CIRF:S i ilD VAil-
7116 FoltF.i-iT ll{l
\).,.-^-( C.. \\..,
X,-
<"
\.o\ 't, -B\\( \
Ft$jtT
5:^!0 ur:r
4it3iLJ.,:!nlesgg
4t',tfvftc f{)1}.!X4'; f i/pr: r"'tsiJtl [,' $1!i'lyF]€: ,"\,', .tiR
'.:rtrllt l v6i|: Llkr iilf*nilr U$$j V Il
Paicsir ? lt]'!(17? t iO?;.j\pf"{kritlt: fJfC K & A*q$fJ.clA"f t:S, ti'S: i:t'.+r rri. 9l&.i}{9 1*fl#(lMmr: ir"l$i it,lFl:
ir:,frtf F${&I,.*.SE*;{ *l 4SSrX)t.qTH:j, tfx.. r}!rni.si|: F:.tf,,[.r4S-i{li{3
Da$:".)Il,l'ti+i i lNTLiFiOFl RE $OBE i.. i; iif i $€{l i}"rli}P, F{Y UNIT.N$ €XTE Flh?i?
i-.1ir E€rri lli: Fl!:iltilvt:i.r !/ir tl:i4 - +OAilir,,
8eqtl.e.sie:ilu!ffi g{rill
It+.ri'!: 5i! gliic"i'lr3l itt<tuestsJ l'lnter il811i$ ,1fd
il,*flfisrfl${; f.{*i{: & Ai.X}C( lA rF.$. !l'd f3l!.'a,e: .l?il!i4li'18$O
{)r.,{dfi}entsr FJRI C;k Wii 9S1-1;l{fi
A"qsionEd'l'p: {:|),4\,}'J i:,nt'irrd [ty: l:!Ft..{:,liH{| K' As'tlon: 'l rmo {xr,l
tteftCwr.rntllf$: FF,:ffiiiF'l$rufiPFL${}.t,rA1-.$EQr"rlRF;'bdKafl:ElCfE8tQtqW{}iqHc*Mpl-ETfil
IwSTT-LL [i.EA$ l3Cy,T OR Flt.,- 0{.1t1R PENETRATIO|I AT', qe r} r,flC'F. TS (;Aqflcl':
.t.qFETY Ll!'AUll,tG ::IEilUlltH,,:1 :t{ tsflt tnOMiS WTT'l{ln, :' Oii f,l}O'it 4.!tC AT 'ffe'O il*.[fif"rnM
L{h'lATKtf'1.9''* nLtCTRtCAL Fli{AL }i.4;},JEp:fi OtrBIANED Hf"\ft'Ff/El{ RFtUi.re F{,iM: tiOr BEHI: eFltTiR[tl
f.r'r* F€ft l,iir.g Pt,t-!s "*"'
S?nbm;: lSStJFU.t
insp,1r$'sl CD
lrrseg*i8-a-S.|"[g&ff
ItFn:: lfl Sl".nc.Friotiil$,rr$|{st ttil{toDdl!tlrrfi: t{lBll}f-Frxty*lathuv$lFcl if,Jcqi+rulili6nr' 5t'i Pl.-Al*lLC. Foundglim S.hrr iFleq$Firl)
0$,10100 |ns$c,:iofl Ai t.ts{'jri
Cr,fr'ffi sFtr: AFt4?$VElf
" ApprovaC "' 'Actbn: APPR ApFfI'"}\|E D
lieirl: 5?Ct pLAl+lLC Sne flbn f l?0q|rlri,{1, " AFprovBd "l0il?ii'1 irrr.orr.trx: ai &c'l|rrn: AFAPPRSVHI]Itrm 3fl Bl[.$-Fra$iitq {Qatitxul. " 8pp(oved "
ltv 1S/ilO -!lru*r:l;i: ,:cfrsvls Artbn. lrF API''(OVEI}
C.ornfi nnti: Incdoli ottlt +rrrtr.,s
r;{r1ifirle'l& ll r blft:itlr4 16';L11 lnsuhlcn
Itsrl); Sr.i Elt-{X' insutsligfi t'i}!P.icria:i ' r:pprov€d "l$d::iro0 lnsusclof. .iRM Adlon: lU],\FFlRCutD
ft{,rrn ti{} Bl-1Ti-$h$€f{xl' f.lsfl r0&{nr6r} " Apuoved "'
X Oi?qit}} In$Exrr-l$,: GftG Actie,rr. FA ltllRTlAt ApPI{*$Ai-
Cttnft$nis: Clr'irlrOet' r:i-rqs.r hl i'!rt, 4c'.,i€f .
1 lrL't3'OO lnsocc1,ff i f.$ Acthnr nFr,R .nPFllicvEndefi, ?O Blllft-fnirr i'.i?rFL\l'ifi
Itr'.fi}' g-1 8{$G-tjsnal iH*etirfii;ffaroaill hlF$c5rv. cd$*.is Acthn: fi'N FLnfil:U
Comm?.I}to: E4,ANNING AFf'tr{SiLqr" IIE#IJIRELI OR ALi- f:XTEFlld!ft WCRI( i.Oi!!trl.gTEft
iFIiTA^t,L f €At:.E4il.T {Jf,l FILL. DOCr{n pf;i.lETfl,qTt0il .qT l:'f::F f,'lx}rl TC} GttllAGH
$AFfTy ili-frifltf.t(i ii(rt;f"rtnEt) N wli{Dor/dti if}'tr}tBl 1' (lF BoilR ifi{ ,4T 'nil/o FSHSHS*$i?
t'
o o
oo
oo
-,1
REPTl31 Run Id: 370.-,
-
31f,?-3oot lnspec$on,FequF-s! lfJrorting eage z
RoqFstod rnsp€#+s:
E$tu{obrua'y
02, 200'l
lnsDsctlon TYDo: ilIECH
Inioeetlon Arba: CD
Slto Address: 706 FOREST RD VAIL
706 FOREST RO
&E0lnrorudbn
ADUP
97S9490200
970-9490200
Slatus: ISSUED
Insp Arca: CD
c
lnspoctlftn Hls{oty
Itcm: 200 MECFI-Roudl h (ODtlmal)' ltqn: 240 PLMB.GTS PiDiho 'tootiondtt * ADDrorcd *
0925/00 lnSector: JRill Action: APPR APPROVED
Comrncnts: APPR 15#TEST TAG LEFTItcm: 310 MECH-Heatino {ODtlonal}ttcm: 320 MECH-E$rau* Hoocls ' (Ootlonal)
09f25i00 Inspostor: JRM Adion: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Commenls: APPR BATH FANSItem: 330 MECH-SuDDIv Air (OotiorNal)
09/25D0 - InsDoctor: APPR Adlon: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Comments: APPR PARTIALItcm: 340 MECH-Misc. (Optional) * ApDrovcd *
09/25rc0 Inspoc'lor: 'JRM Ac'tion: APPR APPROVED
Cornncnts: PARTIAL HUMIDI AIRf 1005/00 Insrcctor: GRG Action: AP APPROVED.. Conunents: SNOWMELTDECK,2NDLEVEL3SIDES,S0#' llcm: 390 MECH-Final (Reqired)
0ti00 Pl|
90+1297
LCAMPBELL
REPT131 Run Id: 370.-.
v o
02-02-2001 Inspecti-on
Rrslost.drnrpo#+S: t$Silfebruary 02, 2001
Inspoctlon Type: PLilIB
lnspectlon Arba: CD
Slte Address: 706 FOREST RD VAIL
706 FOREST RD
A/P/D hfomatlon
l'lctivitv: P0G0021
Const TyDa:
PEiiol: 210107211022
^ Type: &PLMB
occupancy:
SubType: ADUP
use:
O{iln€r: ILLIG CLIFFt Apdicant: CONCEPT MECHANICAL. lNC.
Coirtractor: CONCEPT MECHANICAL: INC Phone: 97094$0200
Descriotion: RE-ROUGI{ D{,W,WATER TO BATHS,NEW GAS BOILER,FF,BBO
lnsDec.tbn Hlstory
ItGm:210
Item: 220
Item: 230
I
240,ttn
260
290
wr"'6'
(Optional)-(ODtimal)
(Optloiml)
(Rcquircd)
Entcrcd By:
* ADpro/cd "' ' Action: APPR APPROVED
Comments: APPR UNE
PLM&Rouoh/Vvater
0925/O0 Inspec,tor:
Cornments: APPR 80 #
MN TESTiral) * ADDrovcd "A.fion: APPR APPROVED
Comments:
PLM&Gas t
fi:00 Pt
90+1297
LCAMPBELL K
Status: ISSUED
Inso Aroa: CD
Page I
Carolyn Erickson
4567W. AOp St
Minneaplis, MN 55437
NSA Investments
4975 E. Preserve Ct
Grcenwood Mllage, CO 80121
NeilAustrian
22 Ballvrtood Dr.
Old Greenwicfr, CT 06870
John Paoffinan
4707W.561h St
Prairie Village, KS 66207
Clitr lllig
115O4 Pawnee Cr.
Leawood, KS66211
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTTCE lS HEREBY GTVEN that the Town council of the Town of vailwill hold a public hearing
in accordance with Section 12-11-10 ol the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on Aprll 11'
2(Xt0, at 2:fi1 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of:
An appeal of a planning and Environmental Commission approval of variances from Section
1 2-6b:6 inO r z-iJ-6, fown oi vaiiCode, to allow fgJ an ext'ended deck expansion, located at
- ^ 706 West Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6"' Filing'
Leppticant: Cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine
-_ t ApPellant: NancY ShaPiro Adam- Planner: Allison Ochs
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspe-ction,during regular
office hours in tre pioject planner's otfice l6caied at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call479-2114 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information.
Gommunity Development Department
Published March 31, 2000 in the VailTrail.
, r5o
NSA lnvestmentsr lnc.
4975 East Preserye Court
Greenvrrcod Village, CO 80121
30&770-0779
Fax 303-770-8918
BY FAX ANd CERTIFIED MAIL--RETTIRN RECEIPT REQIJESTED
970-479-2452
March 17,2000
Ms. Alison Osch, Town Planner
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. CO 81657
Re: Variance for 706 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado
We are the owners ofthe Primary Side of this property' Pursuant to the Town of Vail
Code, we request an appeal to the Town Cogncil of the granting of the variance
application Uy ttre Planning and Environmental Commission on March 13, 2000'
Please advise when this matter will be set hearing by the Town Council.
Thank you,
NSA Investments. Inc.
ffi,f*;an, 4*raigr.-
{s*7 w' Xl'r* tr'
f'f p,+. idtN ss+*;
l0z* iwe;fr*a"w*,
,qq7y €, fr*g*soe #'
,ltrawatad ii,W # ffirZi
#tvr*r**, fi'tei i
{f ffi*[r'arwa fu.
*:st iir**wr;si;,t '3T t%&'7*
1}t't rEM MAYAFFEcT;3H* PRoP?-Y
NOTICE tS HEREBY GTVEN that the Planning and Environmental commission of the Town of
Vaif *if inofO a pubtic nearing in iccordance riith Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
io*n of Vaif on feOruary i8] ZOOO, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building' In
consideration of:
A request for final review of a proposed major amendment to-special Development District #4
(Casiade Vilage), tocated ar iogb S. Frontage Road West (Glen Lyon oftice Building)/Lot 54'
Block K, Glen LYon Subdivision.
Applicant: Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects
Planner: George Ruther
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow lor the conversion of existino hotel rooms into
;;6yE nousing unlti, iocitel it zit t ru. rrontag" Co. twest Vail Lodge)/Lot 1 , Vail das
Schone #3.
Applicant: Reaut CorPorationPianner Brent Wilson
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of an addition to the existing
raw water intake structute inO prtp station, located on Black Gore Drive/Lot 8, Heather of Vail'
Applicant: Eagle River Water and Sanitation Dislrict
Planner: Brent Wilson
A request for variances from Section 1 2-6C-6, Section 1 2-6D-6, and Section 12-14-6, Town of
Vail Code, to allow tor an exte-nOed entry,.trash enclosure and deck expansion, located at 706 W.
Forest Roacl/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6" Filing.
Applicant: Cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine
Planner: Allison Ochs
A reouest for a variance from Sections 12-6H-6 and 12-14-6, Town of Vail Code, to allow for the
aOO-iiion of gross residential floor area and balconies within required setbacks'
Applicant: Vicki Pearson, represented by Ron Diehl' Architect
Planner: Ann Kjerulf
A request for a minor suMivision, to allow for an amendmglt t9 a previouslyplatted.building'eri"ei-ope anOi revGeO tot accesi, located at 1452 Lionsridge Loop / Lot 4, Ridge at Vail'
Applicant: Mike YoungPlanner: George Ruther
The aoplications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
tegria;"offi;; hours in the project planner's bttiie tocated at the Town of Vail Community
Oduetophent Oepartmenl,'iS Soitn Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information-
Sign language interpretation available upon-request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
Zg3O, fe-tephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
",it' i;l' -l 'i"',
/r' ,', '/ / ' 9r;-/ /'' t'ffit+/'rJ\---.--.---r rt- /
'wrltnt AC vt fl I r/
Published February 11, 2000 in the Vail Trail.
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
ProjectNumber: Prj00-0042
Owner, Address, and Phone: Cliff Illig
11504 Pawnee Circle
Leawood, KS 66211
913-491-1668
fuchitect/Contact, Address, and Phone: Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Avon, C0 81620
970-926-5299
Project Street Address: 706 W. Forest Rd
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block 1o Vail Village 6th
Parcel Number: 210107211022 Buildine Name:
Comments: Received variance on March 13
Project Name: trlig Residence
Project Description: Remodel and Addtion
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Board/Staff Action
Action:
Limit of disturbance be established at rear of lot.
past this point in future
staff approved with
conditions
No development to occur
Town Planner: Allison Ochs
Date: March 20,2000
Project Name: Illig Residence
Documentl
DRB Fee Paid: S50
rua'NrDate Receive
Rd- Rcrscn g,7('-9i26-2es3JAN 31 2000-os
Quc:fioru? Crlt thc plraninl Suill. ?r.ll2t
J-n-Z7-OO 09:l7A llsl June Ck
mw0F
GENFqJL NFOtlriATroN
wt/+
APPLICATION }PR DESIGN REVIEW APPR,OVAI,
?hir. q{cjdair ftr nl poiorr re5driry Dcsig Rcvicw rpprcv.rl. Aqy pojccr acqutoing &rign rcvior arrsa?cucivc Dcrito tcvicr qtg]ovJ fnrr O atlnrlti|| 0or a buildin8 pctadr. por qrcdfie iafonn.tiou. scs ltrc ,ubniElttcs*l'notb fr rhc lrtrculr !ofr. r.c rru ;s rcqriccrca nc fri.o,cr;;i; ;.rc unril rll 16c rG.,,ircdinfotmeior u arb'litod. Thc prt*n m.y Jro nqrt to bc rwicrtrl by rlc Togn Corrril .n&q. ilE pl$n tq l .rdEnvirqrrcrbt Comnrirncr. Dcdp ncrtcl lcrt ogprevrl crpr'rrr o.c tar rfl? lfral rpproorl rrlc .. rhill4 perrtrr' bted iliclr|tAhr t rrr.CC'.-
r:) TE;r'y,2111"\4*I;^ @, ;ffioB, LocAnoN oF pRoFosAL: L't:J_rtcr'x,_ WryA-i4d,,prvsfcAL^Dwe$' 7k p, futtt. Fcswc. ---v----76/t**)
c. TARCEL st ZialeZ?taZZ.(conrr|jrb9r-ao Assccrorsorficcag?sl2s.t6ao,,",.l*."f nD. ZOiI,ING:TU0 Atntll- Df)tt-ate N^MEoFow$a$: Z/i// vM4- T
e'€l
o*l{EnG)
Plrof{E:@:@
NAME O? APPl,Gitt{T:
M^ILNO
PIIONE: {
0 ifhor Alrerrdor -
Agilicdimh . ' OfaXo64to,
,',
@:
TYFE OP RAY|EW AND fE8:
Q- i{cr Carrrcrtor - fl0ly{ddtrril - f ro
I
f,aungi(n d'e ncv buildiqj.
lncludcr rry ddlior ricrc rqrn fou4gc ir ecldcd kr rny rsidr:ndnl orcoorrcid tuillirry:3t0 Includct minor chrIrggt to buiftIng rd ritc irnrrrovgncts, rrch ee
rcrwfurg. pnndag, *indo* rdditiors, trrrlrcqi4. tinocr srd rc,iritdrrysrlls. 9c.
DLufcc!rrctob.tlrrr|rtlrctlmcof*bnittnl. Lercr.whcnapptyin3forahritdingpconh.ploaridordfr
rhc.ccurdc v.&rdi.'r o, rbc roict, nrc Town cf veir wiu adr,n'rhifcc rcrrdtng to drc priiat "u,rooi.
PL€AIIE sutillr rllls AtFLlcATtol{, ALL sl,Bull'rAr. RseulruMENTs artfD Tllt FEE n) THET'E?ARTUENT Or CO}I}IIJNITY DtsYELOPiTEIiIT. Zi SOrrrX TTONTACE ROATDvatL. coLOnADO llr37.
"nr, Si?,9D cxr-l-I.elj1uyr G4l- !++i,,!
z0'd 99:9I 00, 8e uPr 0t?s-I63-lI6: ;xel brlll auuo8 t ++lll
\
l7A ll51 Jun. Ck. Rd. R.rscn
Qucrrrim*? Call ric plrnning Strfi rt 4?9.2 | lt
AFPLICATION FOR PI.ANNINC AND ENWRONMENTT LCOMMISSION A??R,OVAL
GENSRAI lNroRr+\ttm
lltir riplkrrion ir for ry pnict rcgririog rgrovrl by rhc ltlnring 11d Eaviromsnrl conrnrision. For *0o:i6eiofotrt,.icn' 0GG os $b'!'lrrl ttaut{aaru riiilro p.rilcrur rilrrovst lh|t ls ft.{ucrrc.r rlc lrpflcrrion can nrl bcrc'cPlc{ lnlil tll togl"sd
'nfrr|uuo,l
is ruhndficc. Thc prcjcct mry dro occd ro lx rcv,crcd by rhc Town co rncilrCa thc Dcri,lt Revlcr Eorrd,
A. TYPE OF APPLICATTON:O Addaridrrl OR.FA (250)O BCud BrceUrtQ CodriottUrlcmirEl Meiror tr MinssubdiviriqrO RcarirU
lli3nVrirrc
Yrb.rcc
Zcnia3CodcAmcrdnol
OF TItrRSQUES?:
c
Ancndrrrcnl lo u Agpovcd Drvclqrrrnt plra
Ernplor/cr-.]llouriag Unir (Tpc: _._;M$c a O Mimr CCI Errcric lttcrrriqr
(Vru Viflqr)
Mqicr a tr Miro? Ctn E*criot Altcration(Uottind)
Sf.cirl Dflclo?;Ett Dbic{
M{oror O llinorAtrodlwrron gDD
o
ct
tr
o
o
o
B.
c.
D
E.
LOCATION OFPT.OFOSAL ? etcr;rrJ:__ FLrNG 'al hil -o /7,-
ADDRETS:EUILDING NAME: :--
ZONING:'/bttdar
NAMESOWNER($:{/
owNErG)8rcr^
NAI{E OF REFRESENIA
PDIONE:ZtZ-tu'r=
--.44_H EE . SEE TIIE SUEMTITAT RI(IUIREMENT3 FOI. TXE APPROPRIATE FE€"
DUIUI' TII33 A'?UCATION. ALL SUErftTTAL NDQUInIi|ENTS A iID TIf E FEE rO TIIDDfpART*ilT OF C'rrurnv DEvErr?u-ENr, tr so-Ti-rio,{iicE noarr.
Date Receive
JAN S : 200a9r0-9?6-e993 P.O2
4tw */b.zk
t ft,la'
I.ff.,';
61111 euuog ? +JIIf,
TTNIIOF UAU
I0'd Zg:9I 00, 8e uPf OlfS-16?-916: xej
Sent Byr
aa
NSA#INVESTMENTS#INC ;t 303770891 8 i Feb
o
-26-00 9: |2AM;Pag€ 1/1
Fl Inuulmenltr lno.
4975 Eecf ft'lEowe Cdrtt
Grucnrcod vllagc' CO 80121
30+770{1779
Fax 3ql-20-8018
BY FAX 970479-2452
Febnrary 25,zWO
To: AllisonOchs, Plmner, Town of Vail
Re: 706 Forcst Road, Vail, CO
tharik pu for fte npssage ttat ths Plauring ed krvirmntal Conrnission trcari4g
qr tlre aplicafln for t *ift* submi1cd by the owners of the Secondary Unit at tbis
p-ff-trnra"f"O for Z pmonfrlonday, February 28, 2000, has beenwithdraun-
We approciate yourfollow throu$ on this mafier'
Very truly yours?
NSA InvcsMs,Inc-
%,u,fi/o*r0ru*//"-/
By: NancyK. Ador4 President
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2 r38
FAX 970-479-2452
an\
February 28, 2000
Nancy S. Adam
NSA lnvestments, Inc.
Fax: 303-770-8918
RE: 706 Forest Rd
Dear Nancy:
I received your fax regarding the Planning and Environmental Commission hearing on
the variance application at 706 Forest Rd. I just wanted to clarify that the item has been
tabled to the March 13, 2000 meeting to give you and the representatives for Mr. lllig a
chance to discuss the proposal prior to the Planning and Environmental Commission
hearing on the request The application has not been withdnwn.
Singprely,
/Ulin'
Allison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
rely,
{P ""'"'uo 'n"*
' Re., L^tru f-i it-t {,uAxAN rEE l)r t.,i- ).,/ !,flFr,irEr I rUrD,l9?o4764634 |A,JL V l
PACE 2/g
t.
)
3.
FonD AOICII
OurOrdetNo- v26fi38 Schcdule A Anouut S1.E00,000.00
Prryfiy l,iklrco: PCL C, LOT9,8LK t, VAILVILIJCE, 6TH FtG
Policy Date:
Name of lcurerl:
May 13. 1999 at 5.00 P-M.
CLIFFORD W. N I IG AND BONNE A. IIIIG
fhe €sete or idcF$ h thc land deecdbcd q rtfcfieit to h ttds Scbeiiutc aad wfnch is co"ca€d by fhie poliq is:
A Fco Srnple
ltlc tO thc cstde or lutertSt covercd by tlis porcy * 6. dite lEsf ts vcnod ia:
CUFFORDIV. TIIGA}TD BONNE A ILLIG
5, Tbe land rtfcrrcrl to tn this pottgy is itcstribcd ss folbs:
A PORTION OFLoT 9. BLOCK I, VAIL \IUIACE, STXTII FILING, ACCORDING To TITE
RECORDM PIAT TIIEREOF, DESCRIBBD AS:
pARcELc, TqGBTITERWTn| AIv uNDTVIDED oNFrncln nrrERBsrIN Ar.ID To PARCEIS AAI'ID
e-i es o*cnnED nI TowlutousE DEct-ARlffIosr RECoRDED MAY 11, l98I IN BooK3z AT
PActs 880, couNlY oF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
Tils PolicJ wdfO oly if Scbe{c B is derDed-
lead Trtlc Gu.rrrtte CoDPrnt
Rcfscntiog (ncago Trde Imrance Coapeny
LfG Poltcy No. CIEH265638
.6 .-j6 .. Rr-,' ir-Anrir .i.i ilt "aro*onraa
-' '-.!/ .,rFir i ,f1 I l-!,
ID.197O4764s34
rA\)L A'J
PAqE 3/E
l.
2.
I.
s.
6-
Fomr AO/CEI
orrffierNo. V2&5638
Schedule B
This policy docs lot i6urc "sliy'sr loes or droage (and tbe Coopaay will uot pay coss, att()rrgys' fccs or c4enses)
$tich adse by reasm of
Geueral Excqtions:
RigDa or dains of panics in poscssiol lor sbowa by tle public ttcords-
Encroaclneus. oved:ps, bcnoaary lile diryutcs, ot orlcr prrrcrs cAich w@fd be alisclotod by u accrrnre sor6y "r.t
iagcction of fre pnoiscs.
Eameo$, or cldms of c.scoeors. ror $ow! by tbc public reccds.
Auy lieq or ri3!t O a lica. for s'irvipcs, labc, or m crid bdctoft'rc ot bcreafter tur| lSa4 inpoged by trw aDd
mr shown by ihc Fblic t!cor0s-
1999 TA'GS NOT YST DUB AND PAYABLE.
RIGIIT OF PROPRIETOR, OF A VEIN OR LODE TO E(TRACT A}ID REMOVE HIS ORE
THEN.EPROM SIIOI'LDTIG SAMEBE FOUI.TD TO PE}ISIR^TE ORINTERSESf TrIE PRE}IIISES
A.S RESERVED IN UNITBD STATES PATENT RECORDBD SEPTEMBER 04' IIZ}, IN BOOK
93 ATPAGE 98.
RIGTIT OF WAY FORDITCIIES OR CA}.IAIs CON'TRUCTED BYTHE AUTIIORITY OF TI{E
UNITP STATES AS RESERVED N.I UNfrED STA1ES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04'
I93. IN EOOK 93 AT PAGE 9E.
RESIRTCTTVE COVSNA}TTS. WHICH DO NOT CONTAI}I A FORFEITI'RE OR REVERTER
CIAUSE. BUT OMTTING RESIRICTTONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACB. COLO& RELIGION'
OR NATIOT.TAL ORIGIN, AS C\CNTAII.TED I}T INSTRUMENT RECORDD IUNF 05, 196II IN
BOOK IE3 AT PAG:E 1 AI{D AS AIUSNDED IN INSTRTIMB.IT RECORDED
'IJLY
1'1, 1964' IN
BOOK I83 AT PAG'E I4I.
I0 FOOT UTITJTT AITID DRAINACE EASEVIEI\IT ALONC TIIE SOUTIGRLY LOT LINES OF
SI'BTECT PROPERTT.dS SHOWN ON THE RECORDE) PIAT OF VAILVILIAGE, SOTTII
F]IUNG-
^FF]FCTS
PARCEL A At{D A-1
EASEMEI.ITS, RESERVATIONS AND N.ESTRICTIONS AS SHOXn.I OR RESERVED ON TIIE
BECORDED PI-AT OF VNLVII.IAOE. SDTTTT FIIII{O.
7.
9.
r0.
! ^|\_.. | - t/i,r6, -]j rxu-rr-ir-;nij -ii?lc
"uA*onrrE
t'--'t ''t1Hr irV-I I r,-
Forp AO/CHI
0wordrrNo- Y265638
S<bdqte B
TERMS. CONDITIONS AI.ID PROVISIONS OF TOWNHOUSE DEq-ARATION RICORDED MAY 22,
rgET IN BOOK 3?2 AT PAG 880.
EASEMENTS. RSSBRVATJONS AND R,ESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN ORRESPRVED ON TIIE
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND LEGAL DESCRIMON RECORDED MAY 04, 1981 IN BOOK 322
AT PAGE 541.
THE EPFECT OF DECK BUILT ONTO PARCEL A.I AS SHOWN ON II{E AIPROVS{ENT
LOCATION CERTACATE DATED MAY ,l', 1999 PREPARED FY PEAK LAND CONSULTA}TTS,
INc- loB NO. 4381.
THE EFFECT OF IMPRO\EMENTS BUILI ONrc PARCEL A AS 5119WN ON IMPROVBMENT
I,OCAIION CTRflHCAIE DATED MAY 4, 1999 PREPARED BY PEAK T3}ID CONSULTAITS,
INC. JOBNO.438r.
DEED OF TRUST DATED AFRIL 26, 1999, PROM CUFFORD W. IITIG AND BONI\IE A.
II,I.IG TO TITE PUBUC TRUSTEE OF EAGTS COUNTY FOR TIIE USB OFMERCET'ITILB
BAI.IK A KANSAS BAI{KING CORPOB^TION TO SECURE TIIIE STIIT{ OF SI..IIOO'OOO.OO
ascoRDED MAY 13, 1999, UNDER RECEmON No- 695v33.
IIEM NOS. T TTIROUGII3 OFTIIE GENERALEKCEPTIOI{S.qRE HEREBY DBLETBD.
ITEM NO. 4 OF T1IE G\BR,AL D(CEPTIONS (S DELFIED AS TO A}TY IIENS RESULTDIG
FROM WORK ORMATER1AL CONTR,ACTED FOR OR FTJRNISIIED AT TITE REQUEST OF
I{ICHAELE. IIERMAN AND KAREN M. HER,MAN.
CHICAGO TII1E NSf,TRANCE COMPAI.IY SHALL IIA\IE NO IIABIUTY FOR ANT LIENS
ARISING PROM WORtr OR MAIIRIAL FURMSHED AT THE REQTJEST OF CLIFFORD W.
TLUG AhID BONNE A. ITTIG.
rAuL g4
PACE 4/A
lt-
12.
t3.
14.
15-
,rA''-z t:gs 16,ss FRolr,LAND TrrLE .'AFAHTEE "'."-. .r;,.;;
irnlr""ouan
tAiID TITLE GUARANTEE COilIPAI1IY
ESIDORSEUENT 103 .2
case v.265638
PoTicy es8e,55638
Loas #
Property Address PCt' c, rbT 9, BLK 7, vArL vxr'IAGE ' 672 EtE
otfr.er cr'rn?Ono r- tI'r'rc AI@ AOTUII A. Zr'LtG
ThC Cw)ary beteby r-Qsures agalnst lo.ss or danage wLLch cbe TnsuJ-e1
shalf Rustain
ia the ev€rlc taat Ehe ourzez of adj oining land sDall cottpeT. purgua,2t
to tinai j udlgf(f|ac or courc AecEee, tbe forced rsnovai of az7'porc{on
of Ele i-ry)rov@@.Es O' tae tlsured TaJo.d stbtch @croa6& uPoa €taid
adi atniag .l and as refersed Eo in gshedu 7e B'2, Paragxaf,b (s )
t3,7.4
?he cot,el. liaDitity of the canpany urdcr said Polic?'aI.d ety eDdortedents
tlCreiA shaff aoC exceed, ia Cle tgg:regaxe. tbe face arnoulzE of said. PoTtc:.
ard cores wtrjcD the Cdry)any is ob.U lga ced tfrde'- the CaadtEions aaat Stipula cjeas
therg€.f xo pay -
this adots(Itelc is Dade a parE of eaid poricl' and jg gubj ecc Eo cae
Scicdufes, Coaditio!.s aACI SeJpu.tacicas tberei A. qceP. ag rcdificd. by Ehc
prov:isioEs lereof-
Ihis fg:futsqnent is llloc to be cotstrued as irsuritg C&c citl€ co said
en'ute or inEerest a.s of ,By.Zater tial] the dste of said Pricl, cxcePt eF
.bcfei! e4tressly prowl.ded a5 to c.he svbj ect fficter lrcreof-
Representing Ghicago Title lmrrrnct Company
rA(.rL U5
PAGE s/8
[AT{D TITLE GUARAT{TEE COMPAIIIY
EllDORSEllBrT 103 - 1
cate w6s63e
P67tct C3fr265638
Loaa #
PropertrIr Address Pg, C, I'qT 9' BLK L. vAIr' utLIaGa, 6Ts ?I'G
Owr.er CLIFiORO tl- IWIG llqD BOlEltE A- TLLIC
t'b.e @)any herebl' tartu.res agei!,st Jocs ot datuge r,rit-i ch ele I'?sured
shall dustaiD
a.s a reru.L C of aay exarcise of xbe ,rghc of usa or tlaingeta'Bce of
the aaseaerE rrqfeffed Eo 7a paragraph(s)1
ot Schedule B or th')ugh said lal2d-
we totaf TiabtTtq. of *a C@ay tmdat said policY aad any endorgcoeats
tbaratn sha-Ll .aOC e*ceed, jt EDe aggregaEe, tj]e tace rhounC of tlid plfcy
ard cosos rvhicb c,le CqPany is obligrated ulder tle Coaditi?Dt and SEiPulattoBs
zl.er6ot to pay -
t'bis €E.doteaea t is .Eedc a Smre of saiCl po7ic!' and is sabj ect eo tbe
Sctredule5, Coadi u:loas aad StttrtufaEioas clereia, e{cel't as "6dified by Ehe
pztovisioas l€teof.
t ,rlrC AE
PAGE 6/9II ILE GUARANTEE tD. 19?04?64534
Reprasenting Chirago Title Insurance cowany
,r .2'!L L' !'r t*f I lFil r TerITLE GUARANTEE ID,I9?@4?E4534
IAND TITI.E GUARAiITEE GOMPANY
ENDOSSB{EIT 100.31
Case fr65638
Po]'jqz CT&,55638
Loan #
PtoE erty eddress Pct' c, rDT L BrrK t-. raIL wLAqE, 5aT nc
Oemet QEIFToRD fl- Ir't'ra rIlD Aorort A. Ir:ETtr
Ttre Cwpnny hereby' l.nctures che Iasured agrainsc f ols b'hi cb t'he It.sured
3!a.zJ suscain by r6e5lc'r of pwsicrf , bve nox aestaetic, 6arn!ge Eo t6,prov'naaEs
exTgaingi o! tDe .l a.ad aE DaEe of eolicT ot coaseruced thereoa thereafcer '
']eauLl
ng frqn Eha exercise au.bsequeD C Co tie pete of PoIiCy of, aD$ TigltBs
to u'se EDe Su:rface of the la$d ulder chc niuera] ljlteresr referred to ia
ExcepcicE !Yo. -g of Scledulc B ("the '||.i-neral- righcs"). avbj ect,
hov€rf:er, to tae fol,towt g germs aad csnditioaa '
.<(rrt ' LAIYIJ PA(,L b7
PACE
"/E
7- lbe rasured sbal r Eocify che cqtany pr@pcly iD !.'ri ci:!g/ {n case
IOowledge shal.I corne to lln .rasured trcf€utdet of Uy accuaT or
tlrea tered exercise of t&e /fi.i',eral tights.
2- the Cqtany taall .Eave cke righE, ac its cdsz. eo cake tny actiorr
rrDIcDilj-EsoPi.ojonlrEybcrzecessa.r).ordesira.b}eiaordetfor&e
Conpaty co avgtd ot mirli-tr ize clre ertelrE of ics TiabiTiEy uader rh-fs
@dorsett?erl c, includiagr, buc Eot Tinit& Eo, ey or '77 of gbe
folLc&'i!.El
b)In t&e Cowany's oro rigbt, or in the naae of ehe
Tn slrred for che Cqttar:y's baa,etix. Eo IDstieuce,
prosecute a4d tr2u-rsuc co finaT detctmiaactoE aly
proceedingrs at .Ial' or tn cquity, os before aay n-nt etpal'
a&tr"lslrative. or tegrulaxo4 cj'-'i.},v'ral or taoard;
b) & the co6qta:.ly's otn rig]lt t or t-n rle name ot xhe Insur:ed
tor che C@pany's bcnatic, xo cqtPeT the glwizg ot
sea.rri cy bond, or utdcfta.kj..alf W Ehc petsoD or perso'''
trofr |'ho/r tie Iasured Is eulit-Ied by lat co guc-h
sec'url-Ey, boad or uEderEaliag. azd ln tbe s:ll?' arDgullc
or iurloutrEs co r'6"i cA l-he l,;o'Evted would hawe 'been 9o
.atig.l ed Dad Enis etrdorsea'cat ,3oc been !ssued,' aad
Page a o! 2
Representirg Chicago Titlo lnxrarce company
r< ui'r 'Lii!r I ILE GUARANTEE tr 'J.,L L' L?r)Fa ,:F<r I T !ID.19704"6453a
lrl
LAI{D TITLE GUABAI'ITEE C0MPAilY
EilDoRsEn?ryr 10o-3'
Eo retair or be paid out of ary .sucb secvtixy- bond ot
udtdejrt,aki-D.g, or out of any c@pe!.gacioa or funds
recowered by t},e Cottpany or xhe Insured' such amouat
as rtiJl rcinburse the CorWaW for all l,Eynngtxg ,nacle
to tle ZD.s.ured by che cqflE ady by reason af che insura.uce
afforded. * unis el.dorserneat, xogethet vill alf, costg
atd e.)Qcries incurred by tbe CofiPady in coa'ectS-on
cbcreni rlr, incTuditg attoraey's feeg.
3. lto righEs, b@efits or dafenaes are iatended co or sAaII be deetted
co tlcIer or be I/:E!de awal7ab7e co ary persoa or ertiEy oc,ber- cha.E
tbe ID.sured by raason of ehe Ilsuraace afforded Dy clis @doxse-
menc. and cae .rDgured agrees + rrag all of the IEnlred's tigbie
and reraedi es agaiDse chird parEies relaxing to Ehe subj act
nacEcr of Ehis @AorsefrteJgt sha7l be doemed eo bave t€Inaiagd
jEcacc, jp tle saac rnazlaclr as if tr'is cadorsaoeEt Iad dox been
issued_
This endofrgtr,cnt {.3 nade a part ot satd Pltcf atd is sttbi ecc to Eha
Sciedu.les, Co''dlxio',s cad gclpulatioas clareia, axcepc as rtodt fied by zhe
paowisioas helr€o.f -
Page 2 ot 2
Represontirg Chbago Title lnurance Compary
f- AlrL rJA
FAGE 8/a
!.L'- 9r^JIJ
Brue D. Arapman
Dr-',L t/ -tiar 'Fl t r!
o BRUCE D. CHAPIO'I
coulsEtr't! t Al"ttrRNsrs A? uw. P.c
Post OIfice Box 6500
vail, CO 816Se
(9701 926-t roo Facsimile (g7ol g26^tt36
e'rn sil : bdcfalaillRw. con
FACSIMILE TRAT{SMITTAL
SHEET
l'a9L U./,
OfOounscl
Mary Isorr
David F. Roct
(AdEltt€:(t irr Colorado
and Ccoryta
To: Eeth Lwine F.,t 92G2SS3
Rc:ilb
Detc: t24tOO Prgce: 8
O Urgrnt D For Rentrw E ptrrto Gorrmnt D pbrc Frpty O Pblre ircpte
lrc |ismu DcN c(I.'I llED w l}|s q65666 yggg46 6i |.frExom onry FoR r]rq usE o rHE iorvtlJel nrrqp 4pyg 11,9r]€ pEw ec.c
# "Y,ffi1flifffJ$ ]{ y:gl;! il fr* ^crl ., REcErvhE i+i Frc6 LE oR
^r.,y
or ER RsDGnoF ''C F^csrr€ B fi,o?
'nG
NA"..D REqp€vr. oi rr* s,*.oyEE oR **, #ffffiHffi'ffirKrffiffi ilffi I31 A:S."'g r.s *{irnrc rb* }, ERR*.
fot,ro.
ft"nb for a copy of the fo< to cliff. The oopy of the titls insuranoe policy that you ,€quested
Thanks,
Bruce Chapmen
a Coirr-ntl
.a o !o"'"un.*n, "tt8ffll,l o.u" rop'O
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
ta
Name: $.trt, garx-r4pt,a""";ptNo. {0Y(7
Address:
ero;ecr: 0L.th1 -'l [ ( ( //
| ;t, Pl$6 marie checks payabre to the TOWN OF VAIL
o^t"-LL-ZL-L\t
Account No.Item No.Code #Cost Each Tota I
001 0000 314 1110 Zoninq and Address lvlaps ZA $s.00 '
001 0000 314 1112 Uniform Buildinq Code - 1997 - Vo.ume 1&2 CB
001 0000 314 1112 U niform Buildinq Code - 1997 - Volume 3 $s7.20
001 0000 3141112 International Plumbino Code - 1997 UE)$36.00
001 0000 314 1112 lnternational Mechanical Code - 1998 $3s.00
001 0000 314 1112 Uniform Mechanical Code -1997 aa2 an
001 0000 314 1112 Uniform Fire Code $36.00
001 0000 314 1112 National Electrical Code CB : $37.00
001 0000 314 1112 Abatement of Danqerous Bldq.'s 1 997
001 0000 314 1112 Model Enerqv code - 1 995 $10.00
001 0000 314 1112 Analvsis of Revisions to '1997 Uniform Codes $12.75
001 0000 3141112 Other Code Books
001 0000 3 r4 1 21 1 Blue Prints/Mvlar Copy Fees tr,7 $7.00
001 00003141111 Xerox Copies $0.2s
001 0000 314 1111 Lionshead Master Plan ($1.80/$1 .60)IVS $40.00
001 0000 314 1 t 11 Shrdies. Master Plans. etc.IVS
001 0000 315 3000 Penaltv Fees/Be-lnsDections PN
001 0000 311 2300 Plan Review Re-check Fee ($40/per hour)PF
001 0000 31s 2000 Off Hours lnsoection Fees OH
001 0000 312 3000 Contractors License Fees CL
001 0000 312,1000
q
0t
or
lSign Application Fee
.rarq --e9!l
rion €e
!r
0(
0(
L
DEPlO
.^t 4."
e
s Tax
Tom of Vril*rr CuST0lfR RECEIPI rlr
DflrE: t/31/93 Bl RECEIPT: 9002765
0n Ailoulll Tp lltI $50.06 rpu cK
0(
o(
0t
^|
^.
oc
nn
00
00
oo
00
DESCRIPTIIIII
FEC UORISIUE FEE
BE1H ITUII{E
TE}IIIER DETRILct( 1366
IHTE: 1/31/99
TOTRL CHECK
A}I{IUIIT IEI{DEffiD
3?50.00
TIIIE: l{:4{:?1
€5S.00
$50.00 neno
rHAilr( Ytlu F(lR Y0UR peYlttllT!
001 0u00 319 3100 lGre€nstar Proeram
sP I $2o.oo
5f.
DR
PN
AU
RL
SA
TP
MS
PV $200.00
PV $200.00
PV $200.00
PV $500.00
PV $1,500.00
PV $1,000.00
PV $200.00
PV
PV $250.00PV $2s0.00PV $200.00
Other -MS
I TOTAL:
comments:
U b'riaute -e- C(,,'/4 .Cll,tq ,
cash
-
Money order #
-
checkr / JU U Received by: l-c.
F:/Everyone/Forms/Salesacl.€xe
I o f o"'",,,n"n, "rt;H,illil o"u" .p'l
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail. CO 81657
I(
AL4Atl9.At'' /A,-i,,-< 4l' l-
;S:
t:
I l|) PEase make checks payable to the TowN oF vAlL
a"""tptNo. 508(7
o^t (t}l tcra>
Account No.Item No.Code # cost Each Total
001 0000 314 1110 Zoninq and Address Maps z $s.00
001 0000 314 1112 Uniform Euildinq Code - 1997 - Volume 1&2 aQ cEn o{
001 0000 314 1112 Uniform Buildino Code - 1997 - Volume 3 $s7.20
001 0000 314 1112 International Plumbinq Code - 1997 $36.00
001 0000 3141112 lnternational Mechanical Code - 1998 $3s.00
001 0000 3141112 Unrform Mechanical Code -1997 $33.60
001 0000 3141112 Uniform Fire Code CB oJo.vv
001 0000 314 1112 National Electrical Code CB $37.00
001 0000 3141112 Abatement of Dangerous Bldq.'s 1 997
001 0000 3141112 Model Enerqv Code - 1 995 $10.00
001 0000 314 1112 Analvsis of Revisions to 1997 Uniform Codes $12.75
001 0000 314 1112 Other Code Books vo
001 0000 314 1211 Blue PrintsiMvlar Copy Fees BF $7.00
001 0000 314 .l 111 Xerox Cooies XC $0.2s
001 0000 314 1111 Lionshead Master PIan ($1.80/$1.60)MS $40.00
001 0000 314 111.r Studies. Master Plans. etc.MS
001 0000 315 3000 Penaltv Fees/Re-lnspections PN
001 0000 311 2300 PIan Review Re-check Fee ($40/oer hour)PF
001 0000 315 2000 Otf Hours Insoection Fees OH
001 0000 312 3000 Contractofs License Fees /-l
^^^^ 4<o,r^nn tSion Aoolication Fee
00
00
00
00
00
0c.I
0
o;U;
(
(
_ olica,
:wB rrdF-l- -:-7
*n, iij,,#i8,€;,i#il,, #,,,*
)EP1O
?p!e
e
s Tax--
,sff?ffifli,,fl,,
oIY Afi0ultT Ip Tir f50,99 rDR c[
'ffiri,if#n
rriE:tst.89
l1:{3:J9
f50.00
t58.00 \mend
Amend
I THf,ril Yru FtlR Ytt* pRYiEilTl
001 0000 319 3100 lGreenstar Prooram
SP
SP
U|-1
PN
AD
.00
FTL:;5A
TP
r7
MS
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
PV
$20o.oq
$200.00
$200.00
$500.00
$1 ,s00.00
$1 ,000.00
s200.00
s2so-oo
$2s0.00
$200.00
Other -MS
TOTAL: :O.
comments: 11 r tl .Tlt..
I \t.l I /A\((.^
Cash _ Money Order #Received by: LCheck #L'
F:/Everyone/Forms/Salesacl.exe
ko
-tI
i " ;r. ..,. a- ui"3€* !^l;
i:;:5 j Er:!;:g!,iE gii;;:i
r : r :.i
h;il, .
{ r-)i 'ttr r r1l ilitffisi $$*dis ;t+
$ftn {i
{fit . t}*r${$ $is:p!F r-rl]-
(
ErL€$i+ft+aTp
+-.[b
o
PE
$fgr
R$
sE6t{.a{I{
R
o
!
:1-c
{f
: i-cJ2r\iit 6 'EiE
i rsi
t!t\rili l
3
Ai
z
a
2 ,'. ai t !?i- ='-
: : : -lr-i.:
=:,!r
qi:r..;-i: ;: i_i_
=
Jp]:i-!
trf$i EI :; ilE I*_s b-;
L ;i iii lril $!
ila
$;1i
\)l
L-r
<;/trljJIuJl'l
I
{I
)I
s
s
FKi
t
J
o
!:c
r)
-!f
t-t
T
t_
s
T
r
Flf
{
0i
:.
si
-.4
1i
a,
{
tt
.s)
L-\ll i.f
il 'rlt l,) r\'_: ) .t{- !} "^ {.i> L\ ,Ft "i
^$ri$') ci: P:
l,;U)9:'',1 qr
o
-li:!r 5 \-.o Z \it:I I ..
6i* 5
;t :8:9^: ig:il -ia'i i8r
.r i i;i
0
-d
: ''["o
rt- "Rali
$s'^q1lr
tD
T
L
I
Iul,.-l'I
{':
:
I
I
I!)l
i.r r 'ln '- lilbl
I | ., i'trl.l .. l-:e * t:l
Jll,-"l'' Y9l
l-J "' t.\lll 1v 'll''2 ul
-, L,>"
-
t>2t'
!rrl
,il r.- i <i
'l .$I-t
i r\\;''l,ii
;' a i
.,it
iu .;rl
:
\ \-'--'
:{6o
.i-
t
"ll'bt
{rl
grf
6'Pt
it
j
"
:ir' \ :i1.,:-\
:{ h4'r A9.
\,II\Y
..(5.
li, u-.n
:F\)::'
l.^ '... -.: .1 "a\.
&t
sc
ffG
r\
6- q-'
..\\
-'-:. ''
'.a. .i...
\
'(iqtslol
^\IU\\\o!
'sr. O
-i (\
\\o,i\\ (\..o \r
. ,.;,, '
1i".i .
'.t--+\:
t,*
I
\"
t ,\
ilr:Jr' 8.:r
r:.--
tI
.
I
I
'
i
I
;l
'.i
a
. tl
I i l.t-'-. tl' *i-
t1
o
o
d 'hi.'tit!
.
I\, . .
'| I
1cC LL'(..;:
o
1Ae i+E z7*
|,, i. t/.1-'fiWu'
'"".,'{r- /'' | '' /
' \'l
oC't
''""""
H
|J
U
a
j
#
Mar- lO-OO ()9: 1 SA Investmclrrts. Inc-5AN
o
P.A2
L/^*f rn
NSA Investments, Inc.
4,97i E6sr Preserve Court
Greenwrxcd Vi)lage, CO 8012.l
.;0.1-770-0779
FAX 303-770-8918
\4arch 10.20110
'l t' Tosn of Varl--Planning and Environruenrai Cornmissiou
Re Applicalron tbr Variiurce on 706 Forest Road
Ws arc lhe owuers ol'the Prirnan Unit al 706 Forest Road, Vail. Colorad<r. The
Apphcant is thc ourrer of the Secondary Unrt at this address.
We did not rccciue noticc that this application was being presentcd urrtil March 9,
2000. Unfbrtmately. I atn out of tou'u and am unable io attcnd this heanng rn person
to present our oblections to the Application. Accordrngly. wc have asked our
arcfttte$ts' Fntzlcn, Pierce, Snrith, to atrend this meetiug on eur behalf and to present
the issues raised m rhis letter
we reqtrest thar thc Application tre denied lbr thc reasons set forth in thrs lener
llackground:
70b Forest Road is zoned Prrmary-secondary. As part of rts onplnal dcsiglr, the
deleloper ocated, scparatiorr of space betwrxn the tu.o unrts by spaculg the unrts--thc
Primary' Unit was constructed closer to tlre sareer and tlre Secon<iary. Unit was set back
fronr the slreet and f.rrther into the backyard Thrs separatiun of *p""e has afforded
pnvac: between thc uruts, defined the units' space and creatcd iur aesthetic dctail to theproperty. All of'the Pnmaq'-secondarv propcrlies located on west Forest Road
maintain a separatiun of space bet*,sen the enrranccs to the trvo units
The'applicant. clifflllig. purchascd the SeconrJar] Uuit rn 1999 flom, what rve
understand. a close friend in an unlisted trarrsaction. Thc property is sublect to
Townhouse Declaratiorn which rcquire the new purchaser to inquirc ol'tlre olhcr owner
wlrcther there arc outstutding issues and which reqrrire the other ()r,fner's consent trlan!'exterlor changes ro lhe property
Mar- lO-GO 09: I SA Investmcnts, Inc,
ltior to the Applicant's acguisrtron. liis seller and the othel ovoer lrad sperrt substantral
atclritecnual tbes in rvorking on plans to renrodel this proptrty. His Seller drscovered
that due lo set back lrmitations and xpmre footalie lunitatrons. there u'ould be very
lunjtcd cxprursion pokntlal c'f thc Scconclan' Unrt and sold the unrt to rcmodcl a siuglu
lamrlr properq.' ou Beaver Darn. Surce the Applicant rs u'orlting, r*'rth the same
nttonlcy, Etruce Chaprnan. who represented lus Seller ur the pnor rcmodel plans. we
can onl;' assume that the Applicant knel rrr should have known about the desrgrr
lrmiratrons of this ftoperty
Contrary to hts duty under the Townhouse Declaration. the Apphcant trever inquired
of the Prima4' Unit Ovmer as ro iuty mattsrs Havrng chosen to ignore his tlutl to
tnquire, the Applicant is charged with knowledge ot'the infonnation he riould lnre
recened had hc inquircd.
\l'lr€n thc ftrrnary Unit Owner learned in February thar the Apphcant was pianning to
clunge the exlenr:r of the Secondary Llnit, our clicnt requesled copics of the prcposecl
pians, aslied to nrscl with thc Applicant and sought to resolve outstancirng issues Lhat
extst-nantely, restthttion to oru chent lbr damages sullbred as a result of the Secondar-v
lJuit Owner's aclions drring the prior ranodels ro the property. ln fact a lien rs
recorded against the Secondary lJnrt as a resuh of ttrc Secondarl, tlnit Owner's tarlure
to rcrmbtrse ttre hunar-v Unit Ovarer for damagc to thc ltrmary Unit that oceurred tllc
Itrs: titnc thc Sccond.try Lrut r'lid cxtcnor work. Again. with thts lien recorded against
lulr prope6'- prior to hrs purchasrng the Sect>ndary llnir. thc Apphcanr had notrce tha!
alt isstu extsted tlrat needed to be resolved arrd has chosetr to lgnore thrs rr,atter as well,
We b€lieve it rs rearcnable ro rcquire the parnes to resolve the ourslanding issues frorn
piior renrodel damages caused ro the hirnary Llnrt (Jwner by the aclions of th€
Sec<mdarv l.ftrit owner before anv furiher work is pnrposud by- the Applica::t
Title
fitle to lhe Pnrnarv-Secondary prr\peny rs a bit confusing. hach ollrrer is given sole
tltle to the land on wlrrch their tu:it is acrually corlstnrcted. Hor+ever, the exterior land
ot'the property ts tflled Jointlr *ilh each ouncr having titie ro an tmdlvlded onejralf
urterest rn this land. Inasmrrh as the Apphcant is seeking a \ anance tr.r u1pun.1 heyond
the extstirig four walls of his unrt, hc is not the sole owrrer of lhe land atfccrcd by hrs
applrcatron As the joinr owner of the tand affected by rhis applicatiou, NSA
lnvestments. Irrc.. reguests tlre denral of this application.
5AN
o
P. 03
Mar-lO-OO 09: I SA Investmcnts, l nc..
Applicant's Failure to Comply With I)uties:
iLrstnnt to Tol*n of Vail t-'ode. lhe Applrcant is required tu givr turrcl.v.. notrco of the
applicalion to the adlouunB propertv owner. The Apphcant fbiled tci do so ior this
hcanng--thc adioining ouner only' learned of this heanng last Thursday as a result ot-
a phone call wrth Ahson Osch at the Planrung Dcpartrncnt.
Pursuant to the Toruriltouse Declarations. the Applicant is required to oirtain the
consent of thv Pnmary Unit Orvner bei-ore imy exterior runcxlel r+.qk cau be donc The
Applicar:t has farled to do so Based upou last Tluusday's pholre call rvrth Ms Osch,
it appcars that thc plans suburitrcd to thc '['ou n uf Vail iuc substantially different fi orn
tlte plans fbrwarded to our client rn February. The plans submrt(ed rn Februar_v u,ere
preliminary, hand draun rndications irnposed upon the originai blue prints of the
Property--cnnfusing at best lf morc dctailcci, accuratc, clcarcr plans c"xisi, thcu thc
Appltcant had a dut1,to provrde us wrlh a set tbr our rewew pnor to this healrng.
\Mten our cbent first leiurred of the applicaut's deslre ro rernodel the Secondary Urit,
tlur client sent a detailed ietter outlining the outstaildrng issues betrteen the propcflics
aud asking lfrr the plans. Evenhrally, our client rcceired the prehminarl'. couftsing
plans Ou'cliont prorynly requestcd a msrtrng lcr drscuss thc issucs--ofl-ering lo rneet
on Friday, March 3, 2000 ai 3'-i0prn Rather than grve von the seap opera detarls o[
our clicnt's good lbitlt attempts to ueet with ttre Applicant, suffice it to sa-v that the
.Applicant did not even ltave tlre courtesv to conlirm or reschedulc the prtrposcd
rnceting. Our sltsnl has tried to rn€et with lhe Applicarrt to discuss these matters, lrut
dte Applr,"'arrt has stone-walled these efforts. choosing instead tu oharge tbnvarri with
this hearing tryirrg to force upon the Pi'irnary tlnit ou'ner a remorjcl that is nut
accuptaLrLl for many reasons.
Objections to Front Set Back Vrriance:
A.pparently, the Applicanl seeks a variance to the ttont set back to extend lris entnwal
towtud the street. We oblect lo thrs variance ftrr scveral reasons.
Fust. tlrere is no necessiry lo cxpand the tonr enul'of the secondary l-lnit The sguare
footagc siz* of ttus ellu)'rs comparable to thc sguare tbotage srze of the pn,rian, i.i11.
This srze was a knorvn Iact whcn thc Applicant purchased the unit last sprrng l'he
ztxring lurutations on expursion into the setback ordlnance were l,,:rown cr wcr.rld havr:
6,\N
o
F -04
Mar- lO-OO 09: l6 SA Investmelnts. lnc.
treen known at the ttme of acqursitron had the Applicant ct'rmpleted the dtre diligcnce
assocrated wrth purchasing thls propertv.
Second, tlrc desigrr of the prooerr;* is to use the set back of dre Secondary, lJnit to atlord
priv.{-:jcv irnd separation of space between tlre hvo propentes AJlowing lhe entrl to the
Secondary Ilnit to nrove forrvard rnlo the front set back rvrll defeat this fundamental
desiglr tbature
The Applicant lnconectly suggests thal because we recelved a vanancc for our rr:rnrxlul
rn 1998, thar they should recei'/e one as rvell Let's clanl-y the facts, Our front cntr1,
is in exactll'*te sane footprurt. the exacl sarne sqrufe footage it has always been Thc
onlv front set back vanancc u'e received was to enclosc an small porch arca on thc
thrrd floor of this propcrty'at the east end of the propertv. Ou conrmon rvall rs in the
mtddle, By elrclosing thrs porr:h area on the eilst cnd of tlrc propcft)', the enclosure was
rnadc at the oppositc end of the building--far away ti'onr cornrnon wall and the
Sccondar_r' Unit. Our enclosure did not have any irnpact <rn the pnvacy, use,
euJoynlent, light. air or views of the Secondary lJnit
ln contrast, the Apgrlicant's rcqusst tu cxpantl his crrtry iuto thc; front set back will hale
a direct and adverse irnpact on our properly. It rviil invade the pnvacy cnjoycd b1' the
two units. lt nrll create confirsion to peopie who corne to the propen;* since tlrc cnrn
to the Secondary Urut wtll rrot be clearly defined. We believe lnany of their guests will
be nnEng our dorrrboll siuce otu entry will be the only clearly defineil cntry from the
street. The proposal wrll rnake the entrre prop€rty louk more like a sirrgle farnill' rather
than maintain the true Prirnary-Secondary definition it hir-s
Trash Enclosure Varirnce:
while we do n(rt oppose the idea of the .{pplicant creating a trash enclosure on lhe
west sidc of thc Seondary lJnrt, we do oblecl to ths massive expansion proposed sinc:c
it rs substantially more space lhan needed tbr a simplc trash enclosure A quick walk
up and down the street will confinn that all of the trash cncloswes created in rhis
nei$rbortrocd are small, conftred spaces that contain one or tu'o trash cans anti rnaybe
a stack of rccycting bins The rnassive enclosure that is proposcd ir: the srtle set back
ts excessive and unnccessarv A reasonable. cortrparable enciosrlrs u,,cruld nol lre
oblecled to. Agnrn, this rssue is an cxarnple ofone ofthe nrattcrs that could havc bcen
addresscd and rescrlved in a mccdng berween the owncs if only, the Applicant rvould
AN
o
P. 05
Mar- 1O-OO 09: l6 SA Invcstmer]ts, lnc.ANo P. c)6
have made some effon to meet or conununicale.
C)ur Dormer Variance ;
\le hare heard asscrtiotrs that becarrse we sought to expand our Joorth floor ilomrer
into thc fronl set back. then the Applicaut should be allowed to expand nrc the fronl,
s€t back Horvever. a retiew of record will oonfinn that Mr. Chapnran. on bclialf of rhe
Secondan unrt owncrs, attended the hearing and vehemently oblected to our
application [n response to tbcir objections, we wrthdrew this aspecr Ji<un our
appiication. Accordilgly, our actrons confinn our eftbns to work *ith and uddress rhe
obleclions of the Secondary Unit We request the sanc consideratic,rr
(lonclusion:
As titlly drscussed above, we are the .yoint owncrs of the lsnd affectctl
applrsutlon. As the co-owners of tlus reat estate, we rcrlucst tlre denral
appLcation.
h additron, wc do not beher'e rhe Codc rxluireurenls of rrecessity have been ntet wrlh
ttus apphcailon. Further, the grantrng of a varjance would create special treatrnenl to
the Apphcant that has not been aflbrded to thrr co-owuer of thrs propcrty nor tfte
sunoundurg neighbors An1 hrudship srrffered hy the Applicant as a result of {eniai of
the applicatron is a risk the Apoticant assumed when hc puclnsed thrs propc.rty--he
lcncrv or could easily have tbutd oul the liuured expanston possibilrties silce both his
Seller and otuselves had speut substantral timc and architeclural fees analvzing t5e
propertv and rts developmcnl potatlial. Flaung assumed tlus nsli tlre Applicanr should
ruot conrplain of the consequrrnces.
Altemahv$ly, ue requesl drat this nntter bc tabled runtil thc next PEC hcaring on March3l' 1000. when *'c car be prescnt 'r person to stale orrr conocms and answer anl
cluestions.
Respectfirlly subnrit red,
by- this
of' rhis
'#I
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of Cornmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
I ',.
February 8, 2000
Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Variance request for 706 W. Forest Rd./ Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th
Dear Beth:
The Community Development Department has reviewed your variance request at 706
W. Forest Rd. / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6'n. The following comments and concerns
must be addressed prior to the Planning and Environmental Commission hearing:
1. Please provide a site plan at a scale of 1:10 or 1:20. Also, please provide
reductions of the site plan for the Planning and Environmental Commission
memo. This reduction must be clean and legible.
2. Retaining walls cannot exceed 6 ft in height. Any wall over 4 ft. will need stamped
approved drawing from a licensed P.E. Maximum wall height is 6 ft., then a
bench is required before another wall. The width of the bench is determined by
the height of the second wall. A minimum of a 3 ft. bench is required. Adjust and
revtse.
Please indicate the top and bottom elevations of new retaining walls.
Please show a limit of disturbance on the site plan. This will need to be
delineated in the field with a construction fence.
4.
E Please show the dormer addition on
new roof ridges on the site plan.
extension.
the site olan. Include the elevation of all
Also include the height of the chimney
o.An additional variance is required for the new deck expansion. Your application
has been modified to indicate this.
7. Some form of Erosion Control is required to be submitted prior to building permit.
Provide detail information on plans to stabilize the earth on the south and west
sides during construction.
{p r"n"uo ro"",
The Community Development Department has reviewed your variance request based on
the survey and Primary/Secondary zoning. The analysis provides the following:
Lot Size:
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Standard Allowed ProposedGRFA 7525 sq. ft. 7303 sq. ft.
Primary 4430 sq. ft. 4232 sq. ft. (no change)
Secondary 3095 sq. ft. 3071 sq. ft.
Site Coverage 8775 sq. ft. 3866 sq. ft.
Parking No change
All of the above comments and concerns must be addressed prior to the Planning and
Environmental Commission hearing on lhe variance request. Please submit all changes
and revisions by February 21 ,2000. Your Planning and Environmental Commission
hearing is scheduled for February 28, 2000. Should you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact me at 479-2369.
"Wror"M-
Allison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
o
Qr
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
February 22,2OOO
Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Avon, CO 81620
RE: Variance request for 706 W. Forest Rd'/ Lot 9, Block 1' Vail Village 6th
Dear Beth:
The community Development Department has received letters from the adjacent d.u0]9x
owner at 706 w. roresi io. regarding the proposed variance requests. while it is the
policy of the community oevetoipmeniDepartment to not get involved in private mafters'
staff would like to see resolution on this matter. Staff would recommend that both
partiesgettogethertodiscusstheproposalpriortotheP|anningandEnvironmenta|
commission heanng onini. item. T'he community Development Department does not
require agreement on tn" piopotal. However, it witt Ue beneficial to all parties involved
to discuss the request prioi to'action being taken by the Town of Vail reviewing boards' I
hope you will consider mY request.
Planner ll
Town of Vail
MWN OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
{p **o"n"o
Sent By: NSA#INVESTMENTS#303770891 8;-21 -00 3:58Pil;Page 1
llSA lnvcrilmcntr,lltc.
rSfSE".ilP*"-*Cqrri
Grrcnwod vllrgD, CO 80121
30+zo0z9
Fu:3Gr-770t918
BY FAX nO47%2452
Fetrnury2l,2000
To: Allison Ochs, Planner, Tovrn of Vail
Re:706 ForcstRoad" Vail, CO
We apprcciate yow initiative in calling today to anaqge a meeting with Beh kvine,
the architect for tln ownens of dre Secondary Unit at ttris property- Encloserl is a copy
of the letrer sont by fax to ber last woek. Slre has not yct rcqpoded to tris fax'
Pleasc confirm whofter or not tlre hearhg on the aprplication for a variroce will bc
proceeding on February 2E, 2000, or wlrcthar they bevc withdrawr/postponed this
nntter as rEqucsted.
Thanl( you for yorn time and attclttitxt to these rrnttcn.
Very truly yor.rs,
NSAlnvesfrnentg Inc.
-iltt r'rUrl"-*Qr',t r//'^t
By:Nancy S. Adam, Presid€nt
INC
o
Febo
ffiA fnYsrftncrrtt, Ino.
Sent By:NSA#IIWESTI'ENTS#3037708918;-21 -00 3:59PM;Page 213
4975EastPrGsE Corri
Greea$ood Vllage, CO 80121
30+rr0-029
Fax 30$77D891E
BY FAX 970-926-2993
Febrrury 18,2000
To: Beth l-cvine, Architect
Re: 706 Forest Road, Vait CO
We receivcd the plans you fonrarded to us rhis week conceming the eryansion plans
prcpo$d by you. Based ryon owbnef rtn'iew offrro phrs, wo have sevonl conoErns,
objections and questions which nccd to bs addrcsscd
TIre irylications of any rmdel ofthc Somndary Unit arc fuportdtt to us and warrant
our an€rtkn to d€tail in this process. Unfortnrately, we arp not availablc to meet with
you or othern'ise give this mattcr thc attention it deserves at this tirne duc to prior
conmitrnents. However, I will be in Vail and available to nrcet on Friday, March 3,
2000 at the property at 3:30p. Drrcs this thtc and time wurk for you and your clicrrt?
Please confirm-
In the rnadinr, we request that Jtou pospore prr applicatim beforE tlr Plfltrtfu€ and
Etwirunrrtal Cmrnission and my Desigr Rwiew Board trcarinp umil after we have
a chance to meet and discuss your phns and ou cornments thereto.
Likewise, it wouH soem pndent for your clicrrt to discuss with his attomey the
desinbility to "clean rry" the Townhouse Declaration Just as a renrcdel can irymve
upon the existing structure, today's sttromeys can draft much clearcr, rnorc precise
documeirts to replace the existing docunont. To do so mey wen e:pcdi,tc your
goveflrnental rsvicw pmces$ by rcsolving outstandiag title issues.
It would scem prudcr4 economical and cfficisnt fot us to wo* tog*hcr to resolve
fise rnafers as well a.s to nn€t to discuss otn corrumgnts to yorn remodel ideas rather
INC
o
FebI /
Sent By: NSA#INVESTMENTS#INC ; 3037708918;
v
-21-00 3:59Pil; Page 3/3
than forcc us ido advcruarial proceedingp tlnt may rcsult if you try to pursue thc
cufierf design which is not acceptable for many rcasons.
IVe are forwarding this letrcr to you since you cliemt has chosen not to bc in contact
with us directly and since you soern to have assumed the responsibility of
comuicatingwith us.
Notwitbstaoding anything contained in this lettcr, we res€rve all n&ts and rqnedies
availablc mdcr th€ 'lbwnhouse Declaration as well as at hw md/or in equ$
Please contfum whether the trpetirrg at 3:30 prn ur Friday. Mrrch 3. 2000 at the
property is acccptable to )rou and yow client ard nrhcther you and/or your clied will
postponc your gpvemmcntal rwiew procgss rntil such tinre as wc havc a chance to
rneet ard discuss your plans and our commnts thereto.
Thank yorq
NSA lnvestrrnts, [nc.
By: Nancy S- Adan1 Presidmt
Febt
norfuiE
FEB 1 ? 2000NSA lnvestmentsr Inc.
East Praserve Court
Viffage, CO 80121
303-770-0779
Fax 303-770-8918
February 12,2000
By Certified Mail--Retum Receipt Requested
Planning and Environmental Commission--Please Distribute to All Members
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: 706 Forest Road, Vail, CO
Lot9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th Filing
706 Forest Road is a property zoned primary-secondary. We are the owners of the
primary unit at this address-. In today's mail, we received notice from the Town of Vail
that the owner of the secondary unit is going before this Commission on February 28,
2000, seeking a variance in the Town of Vail Code.
We understand that the Commission does not want to get in the middle of disputes
between adjoining landowners. However, we need to make the Commission aware of
the factthai the ipplicant may not have the legal right to proceed with his application
for several reasons. We are not merely the adjoining landowners but may in fact be the
joint landowners to the property affected by the application. Since the applicant has
"fuil"d
to provide us with his proposed plans, we have to rely upon the description in the
Town's notice that indicates the affected property may be owned jointly with us'
When the property was developed, the owne$ of each unit unit received sole title to
the portion-of the property their unit encorpassed, with the remaining exterior property
being conveyeO jointly to both unit owners. To the extent the applicant is attempting
to extend the secondary writ into the existing land outside the unit walls, we may in fact
be co-owners of the property affected by the application and, as such, do not agree to
or otherwise support such application.
Further, the Townhouse Declaration which encwnbers this property requires the
consent of the adjoining owner before any exterior modifications can be made to the
property. The applicant has failed to comply with this requirement. The applicant has
failed to provide us with the relevant information, including architectural plans, for us
to review, comment on or approve. Having failed to comply with this fixrdamental
requirementthat govems any improvement of the property, the applicant is premattfie
in submitting this matter to the Commission at this time.
We respecfily request that the Connnission deny this application and otherwise table
this matter until the applicant has conplied with all of the lepl requirements to proceed
with any exterior work on this property as well as the applicant being able to establish
that he has exclusive title to the property on which this work is proposed to be done.
Due to prior out-of-town commitrnents, we will not be able to attend this hearing to
voice these matters in person but request that the issues raised in this letter be heard
and relied upon in denying the application.
Respectfully submitted,
NSA lnvestments. lnc.
IA1A't!'pkd//*1 /ru"rlunIIv
By: Nancy S. Adan\ President
oo oo
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBUC IIEETING SCHEDULE
Monday, March 13,2000
MEETING RESULTS
Proiect Orlsntation / PEC LUNCH - Gommunitv Develooment Deoartment
Driver:
KEH
/.
't. .rr1
31t/
a
11 :00 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Galen Aasland
Brian Doyon
Tom Weber
Chas Bernhardt
MEMBERS ABSENT
John Schofield
Diane Golden
Doug Cahill
Site Visits :
1. Vail Mountain School - 3160 Katsos Ranch Road2. Pearson -303 Gore Creek Drive f2-C3. Vail Athletic Club-352 East Meadow Drive4. Gore Creek Promenade
5. lllig -706 W. Forest Road
6. Donovan Park - South Frontage Road and Matterhorn Circle7. Lot 4, Ridge at Vail- 1452 Buffehr Creek Road
12:30 p.m.
George
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinnor lrom 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearlno - Town Councll Ghambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a minor subdivision, to allow for an amendment to a previously platted
building envelope and a revised lot access, located at 1452 Bufiehr Creek Rd./Lot 4,
Ridge at Vail.
Applicant: Mike YoungPlanner: George Ruther
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND:Chas Bemhardt VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That the developer submits a complete set of engineered plans for the required
improvements to the private drive. The plans shall be required to comply with the
applicable Town of Vail Development Standards. The plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the Town ol Vail Public Works Department prior to appearing
before the Town ol Vail Design Review Board for final review.
oo
2. That the developer records an amended plat for Lot 4with the Eagle County Cterk
& Recorder's office prior to the issuance of a building permit.
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6, and Section 12-14-6, Town of Vail Code,
to allow for an extended entry, trash enclosure and deck expansion, located at 706 W.
Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6' Filing.
Applicant: Cliff lllig, represented by Beth LevinePlanner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND:Chas Bemhardt VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That a limit of distubance be estauished at the rear of the unit and no development
is to occur beyond this line in the future.
A request for a variance from sections 12-6H-6 and 12-14-6, Town of vail code, to alloit
for the addition of gross residential floor area and balconies within required setbacks,
located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, VailTownhouse #2-ClLot 2, Block S, VailVillage 1d
Filing.
Applicant: Vicki Pearson, represented by Ron Diehl, ArchitectPlanner: Ann Kjerulf
MOTION: Tom Weber SECOND: Brian Dolon VOTE:4-0
TABLED
A request for a work session to discuss a proposed major amendment to Special
Development District *t4 (cascade Village), located at 1000 s. Frontage Road west (Glen
Lyon Otfice Building)/Lot 54, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant:
o
4.
Planner:
Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects
George Ruther
woFKsEssroN-No vorE
A request for an exterior alteration and a conditional use permit for a fractional fee club
and a parking variance, to allow for the redevelopment ot the Vail Athletic Club, located at
352 East Meadow Drive/A part of Tract B, Vail Village 1'r Filing.
Applicant: vML, L.L.C.Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Chas Bemhardt VOTE:4-0
APPROVED W]TH 8 GONDITIONS:
1. That the developer submits a complete set of engineered plans for the required
streetscape improvements. The plans shall be required to comply with the
applicable Town of Vail Development Standards. The plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the Town of Vail Public Works Department prior to appearing
before the Town of Vail Design Review Board for final review of the
streetscape improvements. The plans shall receive final approval prior to
the issuance of a building permit
2. That the developer records a deed-restriction for the new Type lll Employee
Housing Unit in the Vail Athletic Club & Spa with the Eagle County Clerk &
Recorder's office prior to the issuance of a building permit.
)
5.
I oo oo
3. That the developer submits an application to the Town of Vail Community
Development Department for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction
of one new Type lll Employee Housing Unit in the Vail Athletic Club & Spa and
that the permit be approved by the Planning & Environmental Commission prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
4. That the developer submits a tree preservation plan to the Town of Vail
Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
5. That the developer submits a construction staging and access plan to the Town of
Vail Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the
issuance of a building permit. The plan shall include the location of a construction
fence and erosion control fence to preserve and protect the Gore Creek riparian
corridor.
6. That lhe developer pays the Town of Vail $13,620, as previously agreed to, for
previous streetscape improvements already completed by the Town of Vail on
behalf of the Vail Athleric Club & Spa.
7. That the developer submits a comprehensive sign and exterior lighting program
lor the Vail Athletic Club & Spa to the Town of Vail Community Dcvelopment
Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. That if the height increases after the DRB review, it will come back to the PEC for
another review.
A work session to discuss a conditional use permit to allow for a proposed expansion at
Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail
Village 12'n Filing.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz ArchitectsPlanner: Brent Wilson
WORKSESSION . NO VOTE
A PEC review of proposed modifications to the Gore Creek Flood Plain, located at the
Gore Creek Whitewater Park, Gore Creek Promenade/Tracts | & A, Block 58, Vail Village
1$ Fiting.
Applicant: Vail Valley Tourism and Convention BureauPlanner: Brent Wilson
woRKsEssroN - No voTE
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the conversion of existing hotel rooms
into employee housing units, located at2211 N. Frontage Rd. (West Vail Lodge)/Lot 1,
Vaildas Schone #3.
Applicant: Reaut CorporationPlanner Brent Wilson
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND:Chas Bernhardt
APPROVED W]TH 10 GONDITIONS:
6.
7.
8.
VOTE:4-0
oo oo , r1. The approval will not be valid unless the Vail Town Council approves the pending
proposal to amend Section 13-7 ("Condominiums and Condominium Conversions") of
the Town of Vail Code. This amendment is necessary to allow for the conversion of
accommodation units to condominiumized employee housing units. The applicant
shall demonstrate compliance with all provisions of the Town of Vail Subdivision -
Regulalions.
2. All employee housing units created with this proposal will be deed-restricted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 12-13, Town of Vail Code ("Employee
Housing"), prior to the issuance of a building permit for any improvements on the
property.
3. The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail a pedestrian easement for the existing
sidewalk located at the south end of the subject property along North Frontage Road.
4. The applicant shall complete and improve the existing unfinished retaining wall at the
north end of the subject property. This improvement is subject to approval by the
Town's Design Review Board.
5. In accordance with the anticipated impacts generated by the provision of employee
housing units upon the Town's transit system, the applicant shall provide a pedestrian
stair connection between the berm at the north end of the pafting lot and the existing
Town of Vail bus stop along Chamonix Lane. This improvement will be contained
entirely on both the subject property and the Town of Vail right-oFway. This
improvement is subject to approval by the Town's Design Review Board.
6. Landscaping along the parking area and lot perimeter will be provided in accordance
with the provisions of Section 12-11, Town of Vail Code ("Design Review").
Compliance with these provisions will be determined by the Town's Design Review
Board.
7. The applicant will obtain an encroachment agreement lor the placement of any
parking facilities within platted easements. Additionally, the proposed parking ptan
shall comply with the town's development standards and will be approved by staff
during the design review process.
8. The applicant shall complete additional exterior improvements (if applicable) to be
determined by the Town's Design Review Board.
9. That the pedestrian path be formalized in the notthwest corner.
10. That There be more screening, in the form of laMscaping to the noftheast comer of
the lot.
9. A final review of the proposed changes to the Town of Vail's parking pay{n{ieu policy and
proposed amendments to Chapter 12-10, Town Code.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Brent Wilson
TABLED
f 10. rinar reuit,n?o*n or Vait's revised parking n";*,.?ratysis and proposed
amendments to Chapter 12-10, Town Code.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Brent Wilson
TABLED
'l 1. A joint work session with the Design Review Board to discuss the proposed development
plan/master plan and a conditional use permit for a park and recreation facility for an
approximately 12 acre unplaned parcel of land zoned General Use and Residential
Cluster, commonly referred to as the lower bench of Donovan Park, located south ol the
South Frontage Road and east and north ol Matterhorn Circle.
Applicant: Town of Vailf/ail Recreation DistrictPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
wonKsEsstoN - No vorE
12. Information Update
Four, two-year term PEC vacancies - (Galen Aasland, Brian Doyon, Diane Golden and
Tom Weber).
PEC REPRESENTATIVE AT DRB FOR 2OOO.
Dous cah'r - #-sfl'33- Jul-Sep '00- Oct-Dec'00
13. Approval of February 28, 2000 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular otfice hours in the project planner's otfice located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign hnguage interpr€tauon avaihble upon raquest with 24 hour notilbation. Pl€aso call479-2356, Telephon€ for the
H€aring lmpair€d, for information.
Community Darclopm€nt D€partmsnt
oo
Planning and Environmenlal Commission
Community Development Department
March 13,2000
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6, and Section 12-14-6, Town
of Vail Code, to allow for an addition and deck expansion, located at 706
W. Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6'n Filing.
Applicant: Cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine
Planner: Allison Ochs
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, Cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine, is requesting variances from Section
12-6D-6, and Section 12-14-6, Town of Vail Code, to allow for an extended entry, trash
enclosure and deck expansion, located at 706 W. Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village
6'n Filing. The addition is proposed for only the secondary unit and includes two dormer
additions at the back (do not require a variance), a dormer addition in the front, a trash
enclosure beneath an existing deck, an extended entry, and deck expansion. The existing
duplex was constructed in 1980. Because the lot has slopes in excess of 4oo/o, the house
is built into the front setback, which was allowed at the time of construction. The primary
side of the duplex received a variance in June of 1998 to allow for the enclosure of a deck
within the front selback. Originally, the primary side applied for a variance which would allow
for a dormer addition in the front setback. A motion was made by the Planning and
Environmental Commission to deny the variance requests. However, the motion failed due
to a lack of a second. The applicant then requested to be tabled and the dormer addition in
the setback was removed from lhe proposal. The variance for the deck enclosure was then
granted with one condition: That a limit of disturbance line be established at the rear of the
unit and no development was to occur beyond this line in the future.
The following is a description of each of the variance requests:
. Dormer: adds mass in the setback, but does not alter the existing footprint of the
building. (12-6D-6)
r Trash Enclosure: decreases side setback from 15' to 6', but is benealh an
existing deck. 127.5 sq. ft. of GRFA is added in setbacks. (12-6D-6)
. Deck: expands existing front deck around to meet the existing side deck and
adds approximately 122 sq. ft. of deck area into front setback. Does not change
existing front deck setback. (12-14-6)
. Entry-way: increases foot print of building, and adds mass in the setback. Does
not extend past existing building and is in the location of an existing deck. 64 sq.
ft. of site coverage and approximately 120 sq. ft. of GRFA is added in the front
setback. (12-6D-6)
I o o U'hq ' &un w[M'd#tu^
MEMoRANpuM 2M t (haq
Tr\.
FROM:
DATE;
SUBJECT:
4-o
il.
oo
The proposed dormer additions at the rear of the unit do not require a variance.
Approximately 350 sg. ft. of GRFA is added from the additions. Reductions of the plans,
along with the applicani's statement of request have been attached for reference.
Conespondence from the adjacent property owner has also been included for reference.
STAFF REGOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department rccommends apprcval of the rcquested setback
variances (Section 12-6D-6 and 12-14-6) to allow for the entry addition, trash enclosure,
dormer addition, and deck expansion subject to the following findings:
1. That the granting of the setback variance does not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with lhe limitations on other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Zone District.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is wananted because there are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not
apPly generally to other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone
District.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose lo approve these variance
requests, staff recommends the following condition:
1. That a limit of disturbance be established at the rear of the unit and no development
is lo occur beyond this line in the future.
ROLES OF THE REVIEWING BOARDS
Plannino and Environmenial Commission:
Action: The PEC is responsible for final approval/denial of a variance.
The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
lreatmeni among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without
grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transpodation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance.
il1.
r)
Desiqn Review Board:
Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a variance, but musl review any accompanying
DRB application.
The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB proposal for:
'l . Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings
2. Fitting buildings into landscape
3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography
4. Removal/Preservalion of trees and native vegetation
5. Adequate provision for snow slorage on-site
6. Acceptability of building materials and colors
7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms
8. Provision of landscape and drainage
9. Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures
10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances
1 1. Provision of outdoor lighting
IV. ZONING STATIST]CS
Lot Size: 58.498 so. ft.Zoning: Primary/Secondary ResidentialHazards: Slopes in excess of 30%
Allowed P/S Existinq ProposedGRFA: 7,525 sq. ft. 6,951 sq. ft. 7,303 sq. ft.
Primary 4,430 sq. tt. 4,232 sq. ft. no change
Secondary 3,095 sq. ft. 2,719 sq. ft. 3,071 sq. ft.
Setbacks:
Front: 20' 9' 9'
West Side: 15' 15' 6'Rear: 15' 175' 172'Deck: 15' 8' 8'
Site Coverage: 8,775 sq. ft. (15%) 3,866 sq. ft. (7o/o)
V. CRITERIA AND F]NDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Regarding the Setback Vaiances'.
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
Staff feels that there will be no detriment to other uses and structures in the
vicinity. All of the proposed additions are minimal and will only serve to
enhance lhe surrounding uses and structures. This proposal will also help
to match this unit with the improvements done to the other unit in 1998.
Currently, ihe stain of the siding does not match, nor do the deck railings.
The applicant is proposing lo match all materials and colors of the other unit.
Staff feels that these improvements will be a benefit to the neighborhood.
z.
oo
ln addition, the Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the plan at its
March 1,2000, meeling and had no negative comments. The DRB has
directed staff to "staff approve" the proposal should the Planning and
Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance requests.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified rcgulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of turatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objec,tives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Due to the extremely steep slopes in this neighborhood, staff feels that there
are extreme circumstances which wanant the requested variances. Staff
feels that it is important to minimize site disturbance to these extremely steep
slopes at the rear of the house, vyhich pushes development to the froni of the
house. The house was originally allowed in the front setback due to these
steep slopes. There are other residences in this neighborhood that encroacfl
into setbacks, via either variances or built under regulations which allowed
these encroachments, including lots 10, 12, and 13. The other unit at this
location received a variance to enclose an existing deck in the ftont setback.
While staff recognizes that these requests are beyond a deck enclosure, the
proposal does not encroach any further into the front setback than the
existing building. Staff does not believe that this is a grant of special
privilege.
The effec't of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impasts associated with
this proposal, if constructed, on the above-referenced criteria.
The Planning and Environnrental Commission shall make the following findings before
gnnting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. Thal the variance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would resull in practical difliculty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objeciives of this title.
3.
B.
J}
OOOI
b. There are exceptions or exlraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable lo lhe same site of the variance that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in lhe same districl.
ro
Beth Levine, Architect
P.O.Box lE25
Avm, CO 81620
(970p26-5099 (phone)
(970't92G2993 (tux)
Illig Residence Remodel
706 W. Forest Road
Vail, CO E1657
Lot:9 Block: 1
Filing: Vail Village 6d
Parcel:210107211022
Written Statement
l-31-00
The Duplex at 706 Forest Road was remodeled on the east side in 1998. The ownpr of
the west balf would like to rerrodel the west side. The east side did an extensive remodel
and t}us left the west balf looking very poorly because the east side no longer matches
the west side. CliffIllig's intent of his remodel is to make both sides look like a common
horre again Cliffs intention is to match all tbe east halfs new details with regard to
railings, color and expansive dorrren. Thus, the west half would like to have a variance
for an expanded entrance and a trash enclosure as was done on tbe east half. The remodel
on the west half will belp the entir€ strusture to coryly with the T.O.V. regulations by
making both halves read as one struchre again. There will be no further effect of light,
air, distribution ofpopulation, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities or public mfety on
Forest Road as a result ofthis additior
t
^(\Yri.
lr;(/)
rt I
.t't\
ri :.-
:'a= 33:
E {o-
F! i;l
nr $
., '{] i;
,<E$ lr
,f iot-- .il : -ri 'lL i"
-o, r )', 1
.': r ...t: ,.n| ;
il\l
I
o9i-r :i r i .l j
:rl : \"
.;t a ''a:& i
oIr:r. .\,".{- :.il'
il,, ;..o(. i
i-,
\'l,),, I,
= \'-l{ \'! l?sl. --<li :
+.1)l r
- -i tj ct{^q
-- ullu '-
j
+ r'i
;
..l
i
r')
'li
rir {,
ir-<
b
,_j
Ir. Iiilr.-i!: i\.ki.
r \'|'r.'; -r rl\ i'. o. ' i| -'L r
,-_14:"; lj-: r I'-.,.9' '' 4'
It) .ii i
h
L
inc
I{-
tli
{
i{
',,1
r 5$JFd
\'
\ \-
r\
1:' /'- \
! si. o!
^\.\)\r,r$l
'"': O
'c\-:N
\r\ :('\, i.r11\o
\r
\--
".i rl\.
i- \
l'
s
I{
I
I
'.i
i
\"
, i 1...!\f'l\lii.'9 tf) !'i '.1
7i\PI,
I
I
\
t
ItSl:lN '
lf
lF
ITl'
i.l:r'
;T
F
I
ti
I'F
.16
i6
Ir------
E
t
T
tI
s
!
T
4(
F
d
III
5t-$
d
_tA .'i
6t> ifFl:qr=
I
g:i:iiEiiii?E
t
I
z
,,..
61t
l'r ,i
-' liii iil. : I't
sA'tit'.t:;
'{t,Ir
i-
$ ,\i uigi I{ ..r!l its ij I{ 7-i -3.- r! |r et i;5 iE 't*,,_ i'tir33 |
'':j.
;
:
is
*
oo
Beth Levine, Architect
P.O. Box 1825
Avon, CO 81620
(970)926-5099 (phone)
(970)926-2993 (fax)
Illig Residence
Remodel
706 W. Forest Road
Vail, CO 81657
Lot:9 Block: I
Filing: Vail Village 6'n
Parcel:210107211022
OO
Photographs of Existing Duplex
l-3 l -00
The remodel of the west half of the duplex, the
Illig Residence, will be built to match the remodel
done in i998 on the east halfofthe duplex.
'-lo h /t Fa-:r-
l?'--P1- t2-'-l
+i
trf,{h,bT
4N v/^1-)
6Nf*
IY\IQ
- t-,-
E \"+.i-:
oo
:
OO
'4li L'l:;' I
,, il,oi' ' '
:.: ..-+;,
06
11n(!'"g*.t*u
lq
oo
N|SA Investmenlsr lnc.
East Presene Court
Village, CO 80121
303-77G0779
Fax 303-770€918
February 12,2000
By Certified Mail--Retum Receip Requested
Planning and Environmental Connnission--Please Distribute to All Members
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: 706 Forest Road, Vail, CO
Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th Filing
T06ForestRoadisaproperlryzonedprimary-secondary.We^aretheownersofthe
prirnary gnit at this addrerr. ftttoa"y's mail, we received notice from the Town of Vail
that tlre owner of the secondary unii is going before this Commission on February 28'
2000, seeking a variance in the Town of Vail Code'
We understand that the Commission does not want to get in the middle of disputes
between adjoining landowners. However, we need to make the commission aware of
the fact that the applicant may not have the legal right to proceed with his application
for several leasons. We are n-ot nrerely the adjoining landowners bqt may in fact be the
joint landowners to the froperty "f"-tt a Uy the application' Since the applicant has
failed to provide*.*ithi',i$*p.sedplans, we have to rely rpon the description in the
Town,s notice ttrat indicates ttre affected propefiy may be owned jointly with us.
when the property was developed, the owners of each unit tlnit received sole title to
the portionof tt
"
p*p"tty tfreir rurit encompassed, with the remaining exterior propelty
*lrrg .onu.VeA jointfy to both unit o-ogit. To the extent the applicant is attempting
to extend tlre ,""orrda; unit into tlre existing land orfrside the tnrit walls, we may in fact
be co-owners of the property affected by the application and, as such, do not agree to
or otherwise support such application'
Further, the Townhouse Declaration which encurnben-this property requires thrc
consent of the adjoinin! owner before any exterior modifications can be made to the
momnu
FEB 1? 2000
oo oo
property. The applicant has failed to comply with this requirement' The applicant has
failed to provide us with the relevant information, including architectural plans' for us
to review, comment on or approve. Having faiied to comply with this fi:ndamental
requirement that govems any-improve*.nt oith. property, the applicant is premature
in submitting thii matter to the Commission at this time'
we respectfully request that the commission deny this application and otherwise table
this mat3er until the ";li.; has complied with ail of the iepl requirements to proceed
with any exterior work on this property as well as the appliiant being able to establish
that he has exclusive title to the property on which this work is proposed to be done'
Due to prior out-of-town commitrnents, we will not be able to attend this hearing to
voice these matters in prrron but request that the issues raised in this letter be heard
and relied upon in denying the application'
Resp ectfrrlly submitted,
NSA Investments, lnc.
-4t^^-rpera^-", ?ru"rlt^t--
U
By: NancY S. Adarrl President
oo
NSA lnvestrnentsr Inc.
5 East Preserve Court
Village, CO 80121
303-770-0779
Fax 303-770-8918
February 12,2000
By Certified Mail--Retum Receipt Requested
Design Review Board--Please Distribute to All Members
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: 706 Forest Road, Vail, CO
Lot9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th Filing
706 Forest Road is a property zoned primary-secondary. We are the owners of the
primary unit at this address-. hrtoday's mail, we received notice from the Town of Vail
it ut tttt owner of the secondary unit is going before the Planning and Environmental
Commission on February 28,2000, seeking a variance in the Town of Vail Code' We
have been told that thi secondary unit owner has already been before the Design
Review Board on this matter as well.
We understand that the Design Review Board does not want to get in the middle of
disputes between adjoining iandowners. However' we need to make the Design
Review Board u*ur" of the fact that the applicant may not have the legal right to
proceed with his application for several feasons. We are not merely the adjoining
iandowners but may in fact be the joint owners to the property affected by the
application. Since the applicant has failed to provide us with his proposed plans, we
have to rely upon the description in the Town's notice that indicates the affected
property may be owned jointly with us.
Whenthe property was developed in 1980, the owners of each unit unit received sole
title to tfie portion of the properly their unit encompassed, with the remaining exterior
property being convey"a loi"tty to both unit owners. To the extent the applicant is
atte-nrpti"g to ."t*O the secondary unit into the existing land outside the unit walls, we
may in f*t Ut co-owners of the property affected by the application and, as such, do
not agree to or otherwise support such application.
m G i=cOi
FEB 1? 2000
oo oo
Further, the Townhouse Declaration which encumbers this property requires the
corsent of the adjoining owner before any exterior modifications can be made to the
property. The applicant has failed to comply with this requirement. The applicant has
failed to provide us with the relevant information, including architectural plans, for us
to review, comment on or appfove. Having failed to comply with this fundamental
requirement that governs any improvement of the property, the applicant is premature
in submitting this matter to the Commission and/or the Design Review Board at this
time.
We respectfully request that the Design Review Board deny this application and
otherwise table this matter until the applicant has cornplied with all of the legal
requirements to proceed with any exterior work on this property as well as the
applicant being able to establish that he has title to the property on which this work is
proposed to be done.
As to the specffic elements in the design ofthis project, we will forward our comments
to these matters once the applicant has provided us with the drawings for our review.
ln the event the applicant has already appeared before the Design Review Board
seeking approval of any such plans, please be advised that we had no notice of any
such hearing and" thus, were prevented from attending or otherwise commenting on the
plans.
Respectfirlly submitted,
NSA Investments. Inc.
aL^-^--#r!"'* Q rru^ir"t
By: Nancy S. Adarq President
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons) Approved with conditions
co-fiity Development Prun notg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall or Leonard Sandoval, Public Works
Retum To:Allison Ochs
Date Routed:2nt00
Return By:ASAP
Project Name:
Project Address:
Project Legal:
Project Description:
Illig Addition (front setback variance)
706 W. Forest Rd
Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th
Addition and front setback variance
Retaining walls cannot exceed 6 ft in height. Any wall over 4 ft will need stamped approved drawing from license
PE. Max wall height is 6ft, a bench is required then another wall is allowed. The width of the bench is determined
by the height of the second wall. A minimum of 3 ft bench is required. Adjust and revise. Show on site plan.
Site plan shall be on a scale of l ": I 0' or l": 20' . Show on site plan.
Show on site plan, Top and Bottom elevations of new retaining walls.
Show on site plan a limit of disturbance/construction fence.
Some form of Erosion Control is required to be submitted and Building permit stage.
Provide detail information on plans to stabilize the earth on the south and west side during constructlon.
Date received:
Reviewed by: Leonard Sandoval Date reviewed: 2-8-00
F:\EVERYON E\DRIP\ROUTINC\g8ROUTNC\P UBLICWO\ I MASTER.FRM
'I
1tl
Is thc property non-conforming?
efihry q'{rwkalkil
qw
O
,i
ZONE CTIECK
out"' Cl3lA\
Legal description: T,ot
Addrcss
Owncr
Architcct
Lot sizc
Allorved Existing Proposcd
-444(--JJ_t1)_
+ (425) (675*) =
,)114n W.zt' u t (,,- +
Sccondary CRFA
-
+ (42s) (675*)=j-!M-
* 675 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition
How much of thc allowcd 250 Addition is uscd with this rcqucst?
Sitc Covcragc
Hcight
Rcar
Landscaping Minimum
Rcaining Wall Hcighrs 3. / 6'
Parking Required TGaragecrcdit (300) (600) fsoo{Azool
Drivcway pcrmitted Slone
Proposcd use
TOTAIGRFA
PrimaryGRFA
Total
1+o+
'wq7--
Vbl l
Rcmaining
4/f7,/' (/ (.'/
wq
z+
'A rl
Docs this rcqucst involvc a 250 Addition? | t U
EnvimnmcnhlAlazards
\715/-s(3W)/
= gg4t +4fr
4 , , ,, \tlo [uk ( qira tfl7
ri
CIt--
Enclosed
% Proposed Slopc _%
I5'
,rnvcway pcrmittcd Slpe_
ComplicswithTOVlightingOrdinance ycs__1 No
Arc finishcd gradcs lcss than 2: l (50%) y., / No
a) SnowAvalanchc
c) Dcbris Flow
Prcvious conditions of approval (chcck
q u,l^ti;h
nrd {nr n ty
>2i7l) Pcrccnt Slope(<>3}%) . ,-ro
2) Floodplain
3) Wctlands
4) Water Coursc Setback (30) (50)
5) Geologic Hazards
b) Rockfall
e
DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Projcct:
O SURVEY
I
-
Sctilc
tr rrooRpreNs
Bcnchrnark
Legal dcscription
Lot Size
GRFA
250 additional GRFA
Scalc
CtawMttic Spacc
E SITE PI.A}.I
BuildableArca
Eascmcnb
Topography
100 yr. flood plain
Watcr Counc Sctback
Environncnhl Hazards
Trccs
Utility locations
Spot clcvations
Scalc
Building Hcight
Ercroachmcnts
Sctbacla
Sitc Coveragc
EavcVOvcrhangs (4)
Dcclsl3alconics
Garagc connrction
Sitc Gradc\Slofic
RchiningWalls
Fcnccs
Parking/Garagc
Tuming Radius
Drivorray (acccss and gndc)
'Snow Storagc
Firc Acccss
EHU
O BUTLDINCELEVATIoNS
Scalc
_ ColorMatcrials
RoofPitch
tr LANDSCAPEPLA}.I
- Existing trccs
Pmposed tces
Legcnd
MISCELLA],IEOUS
Condo Approval
Titlercporr(A &B)
Utility verifi cation form
Photos ofsite
Building material samplcs
C.O. Verification
'Sun\Shadc Angles
Utilities (underground)
Vicw Conidon
Vuianccs
Plat rcstrictioru
Memo to Housing Planner if an
EHU is proposed
i-
a4laLtt 09:13999o MONRE I.EhELL
Monroe & Newell
Engineers, Inc
March 31. 1999
Gteat Divide Construction, Inc.
PO Box 1292
Gypsum, CO 81637
Attn: Mr. Tom Webq
Re: Hernran Residence (706 Forest Road), Vail, Colorado (M&N #427t)
Gentlemcn;
As drscussed, the rctaining wall repair has becn pcrforrned installing soil anchors and
adding a new concrctc wall to the face of the cxisting trmber wall.
we.have prevrously provided criteria that 4'-0" o1r center spacing each way for soil
anchors with 30,000 pouud tension capacity was appropriatc.
The concrfie wall reinforcing should be #5 at I '-4" each way with one #5 above aud
bclorv each soil anchor end plate.
Ifyou have any qucstions or qoruncnts, please call.
Very kuly yours,
ENGINEERS,INC.
PAGE OIIEI
70 Benchmark Ro3d . Suitc 20{ + P.O. Box
(97o) 949-7768 r FAx (970) 9.{9.,{05{ .
1597 . Avon, Colorado 61620
email; mncnSrs@vait..dei
APF-!3-9El e!9:3El Ftr!
OLD REPUBLfC NJ\TTONTIL TITLE fNSURANCE COI'IPANy
ALTA COMMITME!IT
SCHEDULE A
Our Order # v25o058-3
For Inforrnabion OnlYITOT9BKlVVSTII
- Charge8 -Alra Lender PoLicy g].,ol7.oo {RErssIrE RATE}
Tax Roport $20.00Endorsement 335.6 (Alta 8.1") S30.OOEndoreeme"!lofuioL- - stl333:33
*+* THIS IS NOT AII INVOICE, BIIT A}I BSTII{AIE OF FSBS, INT{BN REFERRING
TO TTTTS ORDER, PLEASE RBFERBNCE OUR ORDAR NO. V26OO58-3 **T
tr\o'JQh aLr,Pfltr
1- Effectiwe Date: JW 5:00 P.M'
2. Policy eo be issued, and propoEed Insured:
IAIJTA,T Loan policy 10_12_92 9906, ZSO .OA
Proposed Insured:
CHERRY CREEK MoRTGIACE co., INC., , itE EucceEsore and/or
aFFignF
3. The egtate or intereaE ln Ehe land deEcrilred or refeffed to in
thi6 Comflritment and covered herein is:
A Fe€ Simple
4. ricle co the estsatse or inceresc covered herein is at che
effective date hereof wesced in:
NANCY SHAFIRO .AIIAIVI
5. The land referred to in trhis CommitmenE is described as
follows:
A pORTfON OF IJoE 9, Block 1, VAfL VTLIAGE, STXTII FfL,U{G,
ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED FITAT TITEREOF, DE$CRIBED AS:
PARCEIJ B, TOGETHBR WITH .AN I]NDIVIDED ONE-}IAIJF INTEREST IN ANI)
TO PARCEI.S A trND A-1 AS DBSERIBED IN TOWNHOUSE DBCI.ARATION
RECORDED MAY lt, 1981 IN EOOK 322 AT pAgE 880, COUNTY OF FAGr,E,
STATE OF COLORADO.
PAGE 1
04/1.3/98 09:47 TX/RX N0.2451 P.002 I
:":-t:-:"
oe:3Er P.Rolr. r-A}|n-.rr r'LE cuaI"ANfE.E vArL rD. e6 jI"Ei 4s3c PAGE
ALTA COMt'IITMENT
SCTIBDULE 8.1
(Requlrements) Our ord,er S v260O5B-3
PAGE 2
04/13/58 09:4? Tx/Rx N0'2451 P.003 I
L.
APP- t 3-9Cl 69= 3El FtOtf .
A
'tt}e
TLE GUAIIAN'EE I,AJL rD' 3O
COMMTTMENT
34o ?E 4534 PAGE 4
STGNS TO SECURE THE S{',r"'
SHAPIRO ADAM
IJYNCH CREDIT
oF $9OO, OOO. oo
C TRUSTEE OF'EAGLE EOUNTY
its succesgors and/or
LA}|D TIoLTA
SCHEDULE B-1
(Reguirements)Our Order # v260058''3
followlng are tlre requirements to be compli€d wiEh:
PavmenE Eo or for the accounts Of t'he grantorB Or mortgagor$ oE
lftl-'lrif -"ottsi.a"."tion for Ehe €statse or interest to be
insuredl .
Pro,per instrument (s) creatirrg -tlre esEate or iatserest to be
insured mu6ts be erle"rri.e and-du1y f,iled for record, to-wit:
RELEASE OF F TRUST DATED Deceftber 14, 1
EAGI,E USE OF MBRRIIJIJ
IF THERE rS A C:flAr,rrGE rN ol{NERsHTP oF I}lE PROPER?Y T0 BE INS{/RED Hl:RErN FROFI
THE VESTED OWNER sET FORTH IN ITEM { OF SCHEDULE A IiEREIN, 't'Ht:.I'ERMS.
PROVTSTONS AND CONDTTTONS OF TET TOI'N OF VAII' TRA}ISFEIT TN( MAY AE
APPLICABLE.
NOTEr EFFECTI\rE SEHfEMBER 1, L99'7, CRS 30-r"0-406 REQUIRES
TI{AT AI/IJ DOCUMENTS RECEI,VED FOR RECORDING OR FIIJING IN THE
CIJERK AISD RECORDEN' S OFFICE SHAI]I, COIITAIN A TOP MARGIN OF AT
I.EAST ONE INCH AND A I.BFT, RTGtrT A.hID BOTTOM MAJTGII\T OF AT
LE.A,ST ONE-TiAI.F OF AN INCII . THB CLERK AI{D RECORDER I"IAY
RBFT'SE TO REEORD OR FTLE ANY DOC1'M8MT THA,T DOES NOT CONFORM'
EXCRPT TI{AT, TIIE REQUIREMSIfT FOR T|IIE TOP MARGIN SHATL NOT
Applry TO DOCrMEX'rS TSING FOR${S ON wHICH sPACE IS FROVIDED
FOR RECORDING OR FII.ING INFOR}TATION AT TIIE TOP MARGIN Ot' TIIE
DOCUMEIIT.
a,
TO !'IIE PUBLIC TR
CORPORATION, ITS
RECORDED DEC , 1995, IN EOOK E 938.
DBED OF TRUST FROM NAD.{CY SHAPIRO ADA}! TO T1IE PUBL
FOR 'l',IIE USE OF CHERRV CREEK MORTGAGE CO-r rNC''
essign6 TO SSCURE THE slm OF $906,25O-0O.
PAGA
04/13/98 09:4?TX/RX NO.2451 P.004
!t9: 39 FROI{. LAXD Tr TLE l,Af L lD' 36
MENT
3ao 7E 4434 PAGEAPR- I 3-gCI
t
ArrP coMMrr
SCHEDULE 8.2
(ExcePEions)Our Order # V25OO58-3
the cofilpanf:
1. SLandard Excepgions 1 Ehrough 5 printed on Ehe eover Bheet
5. Tax6a and aFsesgmerlt's noE yeb due or payable and EPecial
aEsessmentg not yets cerbified to Ehe treasurer'S Offiee.
7. Arry unpaid taxes or a6geEEments againgts said land'
S. Iricns for unpa id rtater and serter charges, tf any'
The policy or policies to
following unl"ess che Eame
]-99S TAXES NOT YET DUE OR
TREASURERS OFFICE,
10. RIGI{T OF PROPRIBTOR OF A VEIN
TI{EREFROM SHOTru THE SAITIE BE
AS RESENVED TN I'NTTED STATES
^AT PAGE 98.
be issued will eoneain exceptions to t'he
are disposed of Eo Ehe saEigfecEion of
PAYAELE AITD ASSESSMBNTS NOT YET CERTIFIED TO TTIE
OR LODE TO EXTFACT AND REMOVE HTS ORE
FOUND fO PEN TR.ITB OR INTERSSCT TI{E PREMISES
PATEIIr RECORDED SepEeldber 04, L923, fN BOOK 93
**ENDORSEMBilT 1OO.29*r THE COMPAI.TY BAREBY INSITRES AGAINST LOSS $IHICH ftlE
INSSRED SITAT.t SUSTATN BY REASON OF DAS4AGB TO EXISTIIiIG TMPROVBMEIETS,
INCITUDTI{G LAUINS, SHRTTBBERY oR TR.BES, REST'LTTNG FROM THE EXERCISE OF ANY
RIGFT TO USB TIIE SI'RFACE OF SAID LAI{D FOR THE EXT?AETTON OR' DEVELOPMEMT OF
rHE MINERALS EXCEE{rED Ffl.OM TI{E DESC]R,IPTI'ON OF SAID LAIiID OR SHOltlN AS A
RESERVATTON TN SCHEDI'LE B-I-
11 . RIGHT oF WAY FOR DITCIIES oR cAI\rALg CONSTRUCTED BY THE AIIfiIORITY OF THE
I'NITED SfATES AS RESERVED IN TINITED STAT€S PATEI{T RECORDED SEPTEEIbET O'I '1923, IN BOOK 93 AT FAGE 98,
*I*SNDORSET/IEIiEr 103.1*r* TTTE EON'PANY HEREBY INSURAS AGATNST TOSS OR DAMAGE
wlIIcFI THE INST'RBD SHAI.I. SUSTAIN AS A REST'IT OF .AI.IT EXERCISE OF 'fiIE NIOIfT OF
UgE OR TUAINTEITANCE OF THE EASEMNII REFBRRED T'O ABOVA OVBR OR TI{ROUGH SATD
LAND.
t2. RES?RrclrrvE covENAMIS, WHrCH DO r@T COritTAIN I FORFEITTTRE OR REVER?FF
CLAUSE, BlIr OMITTING RBSTRISrIONST IF ANY, BASED ON RACF' COLOR' RELIGION,
OR }I}\TIONAIJ ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN TNSTRIJMFI\IT REEORDED JtrNE 05, 1964, IN
BOOK 183 AT pAcE X A^ltD As Ar{ENDED IN INSTRLI.{ENT RFCORDED Jrrly 14, 1964, IN
BOOK 183 AT PAGE I41.
13. 10 FOOT IITILITY AND DRAINAGB EASEMENT ALONG THE SOIIIHERLY IJOT TJTNES OF
SUE.IB T PROPERTY AS SHO9IN ON THE RACORDED PIAT OF VAIL VTLL.D.GE' STXTH
FTLING.
PAGE
04/13/98 09r4?TXIRX NO.245r P.005
APt- t 3-9Cl 09:39 F.totf .
A
L.AI|D TToI-,TA
tlArl- rD. 36
MENT
?6 4594 PAC.E
I,A}ID IS
RF,ASON
34oCOMMTT
SCHEDI'I,E B-2
(Exceptions)Our Order # V25O058-3
IAF'FECTS PARCEI, A AIID A. 1)
14. EASEMENTS. RESERVATIONS A}ID RESIRICTIONS AS SITOI{N OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VIIJLAGE, SIXTI{ FIIJING'
15. TBRMS, CONDITIONS AI',ID PROVISIONS OF TOWNHOUSE DECLARATION RECORDED May 22'
1981 rN BOOK 322 AT pACE S80-
16. EASEMENTS, RESERVATTONS AI.ID RESTRICTIONS As sHotcN oR RESER\rED oN TIIE
TMPROVEMEMT SURVEY A$tD LEGAL OiSCt,rptloN RECORDED May 04, t98r IN BOOK 322
AT PAGB 541.
17. TTIE EFFECT OF TMPROVEMENTS EUIT,T OMTO COId|{ON A.R'EA AS SHOWN ON TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP pREPARED irULY 22' 199? BY PEAK LA}ID sURvEvIhIG, INc., JoB No^ 438.
1g. MEcrrANrc,s r,rEN As svrDENcED BY gTATEMENT oP soufHwEsr BUTL,DERS' L.L'c' rN
THE AIr{OIrI\rT oF S1O8,650.5? nnCOnOip October:'7, 1996, Ill BOOK ?08 AT pAGE
739.
19. tTS PENDENS IN THE DTSTRTCT COT'R? TN A.IVD FOR IiIIE COUI\]INT OF EAGLE| Eh'TTIILED
souTIrWEsT BUILDERS. L.L.C., A coLoRAIn LIbIITED T-'IABII"Ify coMp.LlrY,
PIAMTIFF(S), VS NAIiICY sltAPIRo ADAM ET AL,, DEFEI|DANT(S), RECORDED iranuery
13, Lgg7, IN BooK ?15 AT| pAGB 975' cIvIL AcTIoN No. 96cv442.
***E}TD0RSEME}|:T 1O1.1**f THE C0Tr!PA TT BEREBY TNSURES EGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGS
INCURRED BY REASON OF TIIE ENFORCEMENT OR A TEMFTED ENFORCEMENT OF flTE
HECHANICS lrer,ltii AND/oR LIs pBNDBr.r(S) sHowN rN THB ABovE rrEM(s).
SAID BIIDoRSEMBNjr FORM TO1.1 IS APPI,ICABLE TO THE MECIIAI\TIC,S I.IEN /\ND LIS
PBNDENS SHOWN ABO1I8.
ZO. DEEp OE TRUST DATED.fanuary 29, agg}, FROM I'IANCY gHApfRO ADAJLI TO fHE PUBtfC
,1RUSTEE oF EAGITE COUNTY FoR THi USB OF SHERRY CREEK M6RTGAGE CO., INC To
sEctIRE TIIE gw oF $906,25o.oo RECoRDED February 10, 1998, ITNDER RECEEITION
NO.646807.
****i t i trriENDoRsEllENT 335 . 5*t***ti**t *
THB INSI'RAI{CE AFFORDED BY THIS ENDORSB}IIEMT IS ONIJY EFFECTIVE IF TIIE
usED oR rs To EE ussD PRTMARrI.,Y FOR RESTDET,ITTAL PURFOSBS.
TI{E COUPAI{Y INSTJRBS fiIE I,NSURED AGAIbIST I.oSS OR DAl{ASd SUSTAINED BY
OF I^ACK OF PRIORITT OF T'IE LIEN OP TITB INSUNED MORTGAGE OVERI
(A) AI.ry EIIVIRONMENTAL pRoTEerroN LIEir $IHICH, AT DATE oF POLICY, IS RECORDm
IN TttOSE RECORDS ESTABLISHED UNDER STI'TE STATUTES AT DATE OF FOLICY FOR fHE
PURPOSE OF IMPARTING CONSTRUffIVE NOTICE Otr' I4ATTBRS RELATING T0 REAII
PROPERTY TO PIJRCI{ASERS FOR VALUE AND Wf?HOUT KNOWL,EDGE, OR FILED rN THE
RECORDS OF TIIE CLERK OF TIIE UNITED gTATEg DISTR.IEI COt'RT FOR THE DISTRICT
IN WITICT{ THE I,AND IS IOCATED, BXCEE,"T AS gET FORTH IN SCHEI)ULE B; OR
PAGG 5
04/13/98 09:47 TXIRX NO.2451 P. 006
*.-tl:_"t ee=40 FRoL' L.'}|Df I rLE GUA.FIANTEE vArL tD, 363-4?Ei 1t5311
UAI,TA COMMTTMENT
FACE ?
SCI{EDULE B-2
(Exceprions) Our order S v260058-3
(B) ANY ENVIRONMEMTAT PROTECTION T,,,IEN PROVIDBD FOR BY AI{Y STATE STATUTE IN
EFFECT AT DATE OF POtIgY, EXCEPT EX\I'IRONMETqTAL PROTECTION LIENS PROVIDED
FOR THE BY THE FOLLOWTNG STATB STAT{IIES: NONE
THfS EMORSEMEI,IT rS MADE A PART OF TIIE POIJICY AND rS SUBJECT T0 AI-L OF THE
TERMS A}ID PROVISIONA TIIEREOF AIID OF A}tT PRIOR SNDORSEMENTS TITERETO. EXCEPT
rO TIIE EXTBNT EXPRESSLY S?ATED, TT NEITHER MODIFIES ANY OF TIIE TERMS AI{D
PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY A.T{D A$Y PRIOR ENDORSEMEMTS, NOR DOES TT EXTEND THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THB POLICY A}ID AI$Y PRIOR ENDORSEMENTS, NOR DOES IT
INCREASE THE FACE AMOUNT THEREOF.
ITIOTEI: TTEMS 1..J OF GENERAL EXCEPTIONS ARE IIBREBY DELEI'ED. FORM TOO.DO TS
IIEREBY AT:rACHED A.!ID BECOMES A PART OF TIIE POTJICY. IN WITNBSS WHEREOF, THE
COMPA.bIY IIAS CAUSED TITIS EIIDORSEMEMT T'O BE STGNED AND SBALED AS OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATA OF THIS POLICY, TO BE VAT.,ID I{HEN COIJNTERSIGNBD BY AN
AIII'TIORIZED OFFICER OR AGBMT OF TIIE COMPAIIY, AI,I, IN ACCORDANES WITH ITS BY-
LAWS.
PAGE 5
04/13/98 09:47 TX/RX N0.2451 P.007 I
T:-:,3-:B
os'48 Ftrord ' LAflDdr rLE GuARANTEE vArL rD= 3oL4?B 4s34 PAIIE a
LAND TTTIJE C}UARANTEE- COMPANY
DI SOT,OSURE SIATBMBIIT
Required by Senace BIII 91-14
A) The subJect real properEy may be locaEed in a special Eaxing
district.
B) a Cerclflcatre af, Taxes Due ltstlng eaclr caxing jur:isdiccion
mty fi-"[iiinea from the County Tieaeurer lrr th€ courrBy
TreaBurer's aubhorized ag€nE .
C) The information regardinE Bpecial d.isE,rictse andt lrhe boundarieg
of euch di*t,ricts tay lre-obtalned from Ehe Board ot County
Commissioners, Ehe caunEy Clerk and Rec<:rder, or the County
AsBeEAof,.
Required bY Senate Bl11 92-143
A) A cerEificaEe of TaxeB Due llseing each ta:cing jurls-diclion
shall be obtained frdl tshe county Treasurer or Ehe county
Treasurer'F auctrorized agents .
04/13/Sg 09:4? TX/RX N0.2451 P.008 t
I
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
April 15, 1998
Kristi
Sheet A102, Zoning Allowance
4 of each
Date:
To:
Item:
Quantity:
Kristi
Please replace these sheets with the ones submitted. I have also attached a
zoning study which may need to go with the plans.
Call if you have questions. Thanks for your time and aftention.
Regards,
#97 O.47 6.6342 (ext.1 6)
Planning.Architectureolntedors
1650 East Vail Valley Drive, Fallridge C-l r Vail, CO 81657 r &b@colorado.net . fu<(970).4'76.4901
(970\.476.6342
\\Admin\C\9747-Adam\Faxes-Transmittals\TRNSTOV04 I 398.doc
Date Hecetveq
APR I5 lggE
-^_ .-------
co**ility Development nan noutilg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimer, Public
Mike McGee. Fire
Works
Return To:Christic Bafton. ComDev
Date Routed:516t98
Return By:?i98
Project Namc:Adam Residence
Proiect Address:706 Forest Road
Project Legal:Lot 9. Block I, Vail Village 6th
Project Dcscription:Setback variance request - front setback
Assuming PEC approval, these are DRB comments:
Approved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditions
Please differentiate between proposed and cxisting contoul's on thc site plan.
On the south side ofthe residence, it looks as if you arc proposing removing the cxisting timber wall and keeping
the patio at the same clevation of 53.9'. Pleasc show thc new grading lines betwccn the patio and thc existing 64
contour south ofthe patio.
The new deck proposcd south ofthe residcnce and cast ofthe patiojust descdbed is shown with and elevation
of 62.1' . The bouldeL wall supporting the gradc above it shows a top of wall clcvation of 72' . Thc maximum wall
hcight allowcd in thc Town is 6.0' in hcight .Additionally. all walls over'4.0' in height must be dcsigned and
stamped by a registcred engincer. Please revisc .
Plea.se provide an clevation for the proposed planter east of the home so that top and bottom of the bouldcr walls
can be established.
There appcars to bc a largc grade differencc bctween the deck elevation shown to the east ofthe residcnce (54')
and the proposed grade lines that fie into thc dcck (clcvation 60') . Please reevaluatc and resubmit.
The existing wall shown on the cast corner of the residence is shown at 6.0'on thc survey. The new wall proposed
looks like it would be at least l0' tall. Please bcnch the wall back so that each wall bench does not excced 6.0' in
height. Also please havc an engincer design and stamp the wall(s).
T. L. Patch Received 5/6/98 Reviewed 5lIl/98 Returncd 5ll2l98
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION
DORMER ELEVATION
PARCEL B, A PART OF LOT 9, BLOCK
VAIL VILLAGE, SIXTH FILING,
TOV'/II OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY,
COLORADO
1,
REMOVED PORTION
OF DORMER ROOF
BASIS OF ELEVATION:
SEWER INVERT EL. 8123.7'
PREPARED BY PEAK LAND
ELEVATION : 8176.9'
TOP OF MODIFIED 2,, X 12"
1Z-_-l
"MICRO-LAM"
NOT TO SCALE
AS SHOWN ON
SURVEYING INC.
THE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
DATED 7_31_97
l, Richsrd E. Borden, do hereby certify thot I om o Registered Lond
Surveyor licensed under the lows of the Stote of Colorodo, ond thot
oll the informotion hereon is true ond occurotely shown to the best
of my knowledge, informotion ond belief.
Dote: July 7, 1999 "ng g
Richord E. Borden
[#o.teo.^l leFq u'<'
T.L.c.
PAGE 1 OF 1
JOB # 99-048 5
Bor
5
1544
Starbuck Sureyors & Englneera
..()1 Saratcb Road, guite ?05, Eagle, CO 81631 . (9?0)328-?208
I
De sign Review Action Form
TOWNOFVAIL
Proicct Name: Adam Residence
Projcct Description: Remodel
Owner, Address and Phone: Nancy Adam
4975F,. Preserve Court, Greenwood Village, CO 80121
(303) 770-s383
Architect/Contact. Address and Phone: Fritzlen Pierce Briner
1650 E. Vail Vallev Drive. Vail
476-6342
Projcct Strcct Addrcss: 706 Forest Road
Lcgal Description: Lot 9, Block I, Vail Village 6th
Parccl Number 2l0l-072-l l-021 Building Namc: nla
Commcnts: Project received PEC approval for a variance on 6/8/98.
Motion by: Clark Brittain
Secondcd by: Hans Woldrich
Board / Staff Action
Action: Approved
Votc: 3-0 (Pierce and Weber recused themselves)
Conditions: Approved as presented
Town Planncr': Christie Barton
Datc: 7lll98
I
DRB Fcc Prc-Paid:$50.00
't6-77-L9*) 72tsnn 7v7A47H981 P. E7
Q'rrqtiorrr? CdI tht Ploming, $tlff- at 4?9-2l2t
!
APPIJCATION FOR DESICN:REVISW APPR(I\'AL
i
CENER^L TNFoIMATTON ; -
ttis aOflicatian is fc any pojctt rtcFrinqg Dcdgn Rrticur qrprornt rny Jrojc* requinog dcsign lct/iil, rurst
rceilc Dcrigr. Rsvicrr ayprorlal Fic b fibdtliqg &,r t bdlding F.oit Forbccifc irbmrrtioa- rea rtre irbmrt6l
rcquircmcnb for thc particuler rpro+al that i* rcqrxsted" Tbc a!$lication candot be accfocd trntit alt ttc rrquircd
iofrruaiao is nbtittcd- Thc Fits nray aho nccd lo be rcviiva hy tho Tinin Coumil and/of tLc Planniag and
Bwiroor.rt'flt Coourisioo- D.clel Rwtcr Bgrd lpprorral crplrcs cr. yepr rfttr finl rgprovsl rrtcos t
DddlgpGrrlif blgxdzad oBlrustiol ir rbrE l- i
DESCruPTTON OF TI IE REQUETiI:
(Co0H F-rgrc (jO- Asutgsorr Olllcc at 970-128-86t1{l folfrrcel 9)
TD
B.LOCATION OFFROTTOSAL:
c.
D.
E
F.
c.
.ZONIN(} I
NAMEOFOwHq{s}
rrdArLrNo
O I|i|NER{SI SIGNATUfl ,E(S) :
NAMEOFAPPI.ICANT:
MAILINC
TY?EOFREVIanrANDFEB
cl' Nsr Coclrrcdu.- i20lf, romeon-
EI Mimi Altcrrtian - gZ0
PHONE
PHONE:
}I.
Ooogtructio,o of e ncnr tnlding- | .rrrtrc ry q44ltianwkusquerc fqo.r3eis sddsif to dry (E*ialsdal orr.-,rr$rcrcll r.:.ifihng i
Includcc adna r;b'.s*" to Uri$ditgrdsd rllc insrovwrb, srsh rs.
rcroding" lninffug. windmr ddidqrs- land<.-fing fc cr:r and rrrabirg -.rrll|, cta Ineasetur Res&r- s0 [tr-ffii&Y$ffi&."JffiHlHffi*
dedgngdddineg.,Tbe DRE,dEca mt luotc c conccpnnl revicq6,
DRB fcrsam ro be prid at rba drrr of doind- ISEr.urtro apply.qeLa boildiigpcfuilph6c idoilirytbc eccrrefo rdrr*ior offtE F|bjd. Ttc Torm ofl/dl will rdl.irEi rSc-JLc ccoorCtngro drc ptiic,r "*.oe oi"
IPH'A,EE ilJaldrr THIS AfPLICATION. .rr.r sUDMrTraL REeu6,iMENTs
^ND
TtrE r1EE To rHEITEAITIVIEFIT Or COMDRTTfIrC DC\'EII}FNiEilR Zi EO{rg FRON"ACE ROAD,YA!IiCO[0RADOEI65T. .
06/17 /98 12"49 TX/RX N0.3398 P.001 I
o
LIST OF PROPOSED MATERIALS
BUILDING MATERIALS:TYPE OF MATERIAL:
'Td.,''",rt t \-{
CQ.LQ.R:*
Roof
Siding
Othcr Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Dcck Rails
*'lir !-,l .+r:rr-."
t\
t\
fgJ-[tl
t,
ll
Si l'i +t-l'-'It
lr
K";\'a --:*'-1J
It
Flucs
Flashings
Chirnnrys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting**
Other
tl
Ir
* Please specify the manufachrrer's color, number and atlach a small color chip
** All exterior lighting must meet the Town's Liglting Ord,inance I 8.54.050(J). ii exterior lighting is proposed,
please indicate the number offixhres and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identifo each fixture type and provide
the height above grade, lumens output, luminous area, and attach a cut sheet ofthe lighting fixhres.
r!
It
.\ ^ | ;l\ li*Eli ,l'rrlrl i lN-_rz r
I
Ka{''ozrr- 6ar .
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
Botanical Nanrc
A\f1ue rrt{zr. r[
Common Namc Ouantity
\\
Sizc*
Ir/.<"
,!.2''
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS:
EXISTINC TREES TO
BE REMOVED:
au.vL 4
,lta
I
-;-
I
I
*M inimum requirements for landscaping:deciduous trecs - 2 inch caliper
conifcrous trccs - 6 fcct in hcicht
shrubs - 5 gallons
Squars Footasc
GROUND COVER
SOD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimnring pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicatc top and
bottom clevations of retaining walls. Maxinrum height of walls within the front setback is 3 fcet. Maximum height of
walls elsewhere on the property is 6 feet.
& A,e>Je
6 {bbL 3_
6bN
7@L -g
r -.- \l\-{_
r'.4\t
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
June 8, 1998
fFrourD BY rHE
TOWN OF VAIL
PI.ANNING AND
ENVI RON M ET.TTAL COM M ISSION
DATE:
PLANNER:
/; 4,61{
gl)
A requesi for a front setback variance, to allow for an additional 82 square feet of
GRFA in the front setback (on an existing house 6' into the front setback) for a
residential addition, located at 706 Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th
Filing.
Applicant: Nancy Adam, represented by Dale Smith of Fritzlen Pierce Briner
Planner: Christie Barton
I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REAUEST
This application has been revised lo remove the proposed dormer addition from the froni
setback. The variance application has been revised to a deck enclosure in the front setback (82
square feet).
An overview of the remaining improvements which are not part of the variance include the
following: lhe ground level will be expanded to accommodale an elevator and mechanicals (107
square feet (SF) addition); level 2 will have the elevaior and a storage closet (85 SF addition), an
exterior slairuay will be added to access level 2: level 3 will enclose the deck area in the front
setback to expand the dining area (location of 82 SF variance), expand the living area, construct
a new deck, and replace a timber retaining wall with a concrete wall (an additional 461 SF
addition). Level 4 will expand the living space by enclosing a deck, constructing a new deck and
adding a dormer (455 SF addition). This dormer has been moved out of the front selback.
The duplex was originally built in 1980 and located on the north edge of the lot due to steep
slopes. The regulations in effect at the time of construction allowed a 10' front setback due to the
40% slope.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential District
Lot Size: 58,498 sq. ft./1 .342 acres
Standard Allowed
GRFA: 7,525 sq. ft.
Primary Unit: nla
Secondary Unit 3,095 sq. ft.
Building Heightr 33'
Setbacks:20' (front)
Site Coverage: 8,775 sq. ft. (15%)
Landscaping: 35,099 sq. ft. (60%)
Parking: no change
Existino
5,739 sq. ft.
3,020 sq. ft.
2,719sq. ft.
JZ
9'(front)
2,970sq. ft. (5.1%)
52,300 sq. ft. (89%)
Prooosed
6,929 sq. ft.
4,210sq. ft.
No change
33'
no change
no change
51,804 sq. ft. (88.5%)
,-m
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A VARIANCE REOUEST
Upon review of Section 12-17-6, Variance Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested front
yard selback variance. The recommendation for approval is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The proposed encroachment of the deck enclosure on the third level into
the front setback will have minimal impacts on existing or potential uses
and structures in the area. Bulk and mass will noi be increased by the
proposed enclosure as it is currently substantially enclosed. The project
will not impact adjacent property owners as lhe house will remain a
residential use.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
Due lo the existing steep slopes on the property, staff believes that this
proposal will not be a grant of special privilege. Many of the homes in lhe
area are built close to the road in order to reduce the impact to this site
and these changes will be minor. lf an addition was done in the rear of the
house, unnecessary site dislurbance would need to occur. Limiting
disturbance in the area of steep slopes to the rear of the structure will
reduce the potential for erosion and damage to the environment.
The effest of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will have little or no effect on these issues. This proposal
maintains the residenlial atmosphere of the neighborhood.
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before
granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same districl.
That the granting of the variance will not be delrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properlies or
improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
B.
1.
2.
3.
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistenl with the objectives of this Title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same sile of the variance thai do noi apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Upon review of Title 12, Chapter 17 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Community
Development Department recommends approval of the proposed variance, subject to the
following findings:
1. That the granting of the variance will not conslitute a grani of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That there are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to olher properties in
lhe same zone.
The recommendalion of approval is also subject to the following condition:
1. That the applicant shall maintain a limit of disturbance line as shown on the site
plan. No building addilions shall be allowed beyond this line in the future. This
limit of disturbance and any associated variances will become obsolete if the
duplex is demolished and rebuilt.
f :/everyone/pec/memosl98/Ada m. 608
EXISTIN6
#YLI6HT
VAooz08:35 FAI 970178,1901 FRITZLEN PIERCEoa/05/98
ffi;iiin
iH'fi#fiLlll'liilffilhh
!!rialta
fl!
ri!idffifi*!*rihililillllllll
e
\
--4-t-
tl{i
,'tr"rffirWW
I
I
&ililiriurocEIB
r|.-rE.rl
- rrr-rrl LE a
I Ea t !1irl tln -tra r
3CN:tGtS:lU I|VOV
ll.'
* ,-'
'a -'ft ,-'
v:;'
ir
rftcoPY
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Monday, June 8, 1998
FINAL AGENDA
Project Orientation / LUNCH - Communitv Development Department
12:30 p.m.
1. Vail Associates - Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1st.
2. Adam - 706 Forest Road
3. Grand Traverse - Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision Filing #1'
4. Dayco - 1315 SPraddle Creek Road
5. Rad Five L.L.C. - 4469 Timber Falls Court
6. Accardo - 1998 Sunburst Drive
7. Bass - 345 Mill Creek Circle
George
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6.00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p m
Public Hearino - Town Council Ghambers 2:00 p'm'
1. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the expansion of
the fiont entry, located at 2005 West Gore Creek Drive/Unplatted'
Applicant: Tom Thomson, represented by John Perkins
Planner:Christie Barton
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
2. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the construction of
a residential addition, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd.
Applicant: Nate Accardo, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce' Briner
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
Updated 6/09 lOam
11:30p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
John Schofield
Galen Aasland
Ann Bishop (left at 5:30 Pm)
Brian Doyon
Tom Weber
Site Visits :
MEMBERS ABSENT
Greg Moffet
Diane Golden
Driver:
@
'r?.dr! .;o;
Updated 6/09 lOanr
1. That the construction signage be brought into compliance with the Town of Vail
sign regulations.
3. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the conversion of a
garage to GRFA, and for the expansion of the mechanical room, located at 345 Mill Creek
Circle/Lot 14, Block 1, Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Lee M. Bass, represented by Snowden and Hopkins
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Ann Bishop SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the Town of Vail Public Works Department review and approve the proposed
Parking Plan.
4. A worksession to review an amendment to a previously approved plan for the Timber
Fal|sDeve|opment'|ocatedat446gTimberFa||sCourUunp|atted'
Applicant: RAD Five L.L.C., represented by Greg Amsden
Pianner: Dominc Mauriello
WORKSESSION - NO VOTE
S. A request for an extension of a conditional use permit for the Lionshead Children's Tent,
generally locateo-nextio the Lionshead Children's ski school/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1st.
Applicant: Vail Associates' represented by David Thorpe
Planner: Christie Barton
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22,1998
6. A request for a minor subdivision to amend a building envelope, to allow for the
installation of a gazebo, located at 1315 Spraddle creek Road/Lot 12, Spraddle creek
Estates.
App|icant:DaycoHo|dingCorporation,representedbyDavidArgoofNoName
Architects
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
7 . A request for a major amendment 10 s-pecial Development Distri-ct #22, Grand Traverse,
and a request toi i major subdivision for Lots 5, 6, 7, g, g and 10, Dauphinais-Moseley
Subdivision Filing #1.
APPlicant: Patrick DauPhinais
Planner: George Ruther
Updated 6/09 lOam
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0
APPROVAL FOR RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL- MAJOR SUBDIVISION
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0
APPROVAL FOR RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL WITH 3 CONDITIONS -
SDD #22 MAJOR AMENDMENT
1. That the maximum garage credit for each of the primary units constructed in the
development not exceed six hundred (600) square feet, unless and EHU is
constructedonthelot'inwhichcase,anadditiona|600sq'ft.garagecreditbe
allowed.
2. That the maximum number of outdoor lights permitted on each of the lots in the
development not exceed 15 lights total'
8. A request for a front setback variance, to allow for a proposed residential addition'
located at 706 Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th'
App|icant:NancyAdam,representedbyFritz|en'Pierce,BrinerArchitects
Planner: Christie Barton
MOTION: nnn Aiship sECOND: Gaten Aasland VOTE: 4-0 (Tom weber
recused)
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the applicant shall maintain a limit of disturbance line as shown on the site
plan. No tjrirJi.g additions shall be altowed beyond this line in the future. This
limit of disturbance and any assoclated variances will become obsolete if the
duPlex is demolished and rebuilt'
g.Arequestforaworksessiontodiscussamajoramendmentlo.SpecialDeve|opment
District #6, Vait Village Inn to allow for a hotei redevelopment, located at 100 East
Meadow Drive, Lots M and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st'
Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22,1958
10. A request for a side setback variance, to allow for ihe construction of an additional
g"rui", located at 813 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 1, Block 1' Vail Potato Patch'
Applicant: Liz & Luc Meyer, represented by William Pierce
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22,1998
Updatcd 6/09 l0am
11 . A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a bed and breakfast operation, located
al 1779 Sierra Trail/Lot 18, Vail Village West Filing #1.
Applicant: Malin Johnsdotter/ Robert Zeltman
Planner: Christie Barton
TABLED UNTIL JULY 27, 1998
12. A requesl for a final review of a major amendment to SDD #4, to allow for a fractional fee
club and a change to the approved Development Plan, located at 1325 Westhaven Dr.,
Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A'
Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represenied by Robby Robinson
Planner: George Ruther
WITHDRAWN
'13. Information UPdate
14. Approval of May 18, 1998 minutes'
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22,1998
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
;;;;il;il;; hours in tne project planneds'office located at the Town of Vail Community
De:velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road'
sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification Please call 479'2356' Telephone for the
Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 5, 1998 in the Vail Trail
21 May 98
Adam Residence
GRFA Calculations
Lot Size;
Site Coverage Allowed;
Site Coverage Existing;
Site Coverage Proposed;
Site Coverage Remaining;
GRFA
Base GRFA Allowed;
60%/40% Prim/Sec.;
425 Credit (ea. side);
Total GRFA Allowedl
Primary GRFA
Total Allowed;
Total Existing;
Total Proposed;
Total Remaining;
58,498 square feet
8775 square feet(15%)
2,970 square feet
3,619 square feet
5,156 square feet
ARCHITECTS
6,675 square feet r#-' f u "
4,005 12,670 square feet
425 square feet each side
4,430 Primary / lt00-Secondaryu45
lo+,Y';,#"'{^L
qTl
K:\9747-Adam\TOV\PEC I \pecgrfa.wpd
PlanningoArchitecturealnteriors
'1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-l r Vail, CO 81657 . fpb@colorado.net . fax (970) 47 6-4901 . (970) 476-6342
41430 square feet
3,020 square feet
'*,23?squareteet (L(Q
{4}8 square feet
Garage Existing GRFA Propose GRFA TOTAL
Level One 517 130 _ns- wv K ne-4fl z.s
Level Two 675 85 760
Level Three 1364 s43 1907
Level Four 851 s{VAf ns6 13c.tC
3020 \-+2{F 4232
U
0l June 1998
Christi Barton
Town of Vail, Community Development
Re; Adam Resiclence
ARCH IT ECTS
Christi.
Attached are the plans ofthe Adam residence reflecting those changes requested at the initial
PEC meeting. The changes include;
Providing additional landscaping east ofthe new proposed decl<.
Moving tl.re proposed roof dormer up the roof, or.rt of the front setback. Flashing will be
added adj acent to this dormer to prevent runoff d ivcrsion to any acljaccnt properties. The
dormer is still within the height limitation.
The lower level mechanical room has also been nroved south out ofthe front setback.
The changes have been inclicatcd by "clonds" orr tlrc drau'ings. If there' is rnything else you need
please call. Thanl<s lirr vour assistrnce on this project.
o
a
OeC ttu4r-
Dale Smith
Architect
D'lt*T?Tiy'd
K:\9747-Adam\TOV\cb0 I 0693.Ntd
PlanningoArchitcctrrrealnteriors
1650 EastVail Vallcv Drive FallridgeC-l r Vail,CO81657 r iPb@colorrdo.nct . fax (97(l) {7(r-4901 . (97O) 476-6342
21 May 98
Adam Residence
GRFA Calculations
Lot Size;
Site Coverage Allowed;
Site Coverage Existing;
Site Coverage Proposed;
Site Coverage Remaining;
GRFA
Base GRFA Allowed;
60%/40% Prim/Sec.;
425 Credit (ea. side);
Total GRFAAllowed;
Primary GRFA
Total Allowed;
Total Existing;
Total Proposed;
Total Remaining;
./
58,498 square feet
8775 square feet (l 5/o) /
2,970 square feett ,
3,619 square feet V -
5,156 square feet /
^t6,675 square feet v
4,005 /2,670 square feet /
,
f@ square feef each side /
4,430 Primary l++40 SecondaryM5
ARCHITECTS
4,430 square feet
31020 square feet
4,232 square feet
198 square feet
K :\9747-Adam\TOV\pecgrfa.wpd
PlanningoArchitectureolnteriors
1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 r Vail, CO 81657 o fpb@colorado.net . fax (97O) 476-4901 . (97O\ 476-6342
Garage Existing GRFA Propose GRFA TOTAL
Level One 517 130 r29 2s9
Level Two 675 85 760
Level Three 1364 543 1907
Level Four 851 455 1306_5:=\-
3020 t2t2 4232 )
06/2t/sE 14:50 F I s70470{901 FnITZrEl{@oo1
Fax Cover Sheet
Datq May22,1998
To: Christi Barton
Eutt 479-2452
Rc: AdadResidence
Sendcr: Dale Smith
Thatrks fot taking time out to rcvieurthe Adnm GRFA wiih mc r
opp*trrity to bster faniliadze Vouwiththe|rou1:.T1tbtt *
importantthat I had the
some to an agr€cment.
di"* tlat-tne parties thatreqrresteat this urting failed b is shorrld bring closre to
this srrbjcot
Attachcd is the a copy oftbe urrmben we agrecd ol If youhavg questions or ifthsrE's
anything else I can do plcase 661[. Jhanlrs 1s{ havc a great wcclcend!
receive 2
li:u?47:Atlrtr\TO'VU'1r.Dz ttl.wPe
Planning o Archiecture '
1650 Last Vril vrlley Drlve Falkklpc C-r r Vail, Co 81557 r bb@cnlardorat
fue(s) inctuding this cover sheet lf y'- nl"o"ecall O7$47&l6342F;xl'.7
ARCHITECTS
do not rcceivc the pages,
tCM&,1t*
Dale Smith
&chifect
cc; Nancy Adarn
ldark Donaldson
f:r (970f /tz6-i9ot . (9m, +7ffiin2
UAY, -lJ' 98 [tED] l5:50 VlilD ARCo }l ITECTS
- May 13,l99E
TEL:19i09495205
One psge sent by facsirnile only.
P,00t
00{E E SErvea crEtx lLvD
Sulrt 207
D0x 5500
lvott, C0 81G20
970.9q9.5?00
vmd@roil.nat
F4r.9q9.5205
lvfs. Christllc Barton, Planrrer
Departmcnt of Community Devclopmcnt
Town of Vail
VNil,CO
Re: Nanry Shapiro Adam Variancc Rcqucst
706 Forest Road
Vail,CO
Dear Ms- Bartorr
On behalf of Michacl and Karen Herman, pleasc accept this letter as a formal r€qucst of the Town
of Vail Dcpartrncnt of Community Deraelop,mcnt to srrange to rcvicw with us thc method of calculation of
GRFA for the Adam Rcsidcnce on sitc.
It is ogr imrdon lo hmor the rcqrnst of tbc Plaruing snd Envirormcntal Cornmission by cxploring
all feasible maMr of readring agecnrcut bcturecn the tw partrlcs regarding trc aborrc rcfcrcncod
application. Rcmoving any discrepancics of GRIA calculations uould be of grcat valuc to this process-
Thank you for 1l9u etteution to this mttEr and I took forward to hearing from you as to the best way to
coofdinatc such a rwieur.
I will be available to cmrdimte a time that *orb for all parties ircltding pursclf, Dalc Smi0r,
Bnrcc Chaprnan and whomarr clsc rnay wish or accd b ottenrl a walk through lo confirm cxisting GRFA
areas. Wc will bring the plans rrc have availablc !o a$i$ in fie process-
hcs idcnt/Diroc{or of Des i grt
VICTOR MARK DONALINON ARCHITECTS
Michacl and Karcn Hcrman
Bruce Chapmil, Esq.
Dalc Smith. Architcct
ANCflIIECTS
BRUCE D. CHAPMAN
COUNSELORS & ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P,C,
Post Oflice Box 6500
Vail, CO 81658
Bruce D. Chapman Of Counsel
David F. Rock
(Admitted in Colorado
and Georgia)
M. Barry Leitz
(Federal Tax Matters-
Admitted in Georgia)
May 11,1998
Christie Barton, Planner
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
Vail, CO
Re: Adam Residence Variance Request
Unit A, Lot 9, Block 1,
Vail Village Sixth Filing
Vail, Co
Dear Ms. Barton:
I am the attorney for Michael and Karen Herman who are the owners of
Unit B. On behalf of Michael and Karen Herman, I wish to express their
objection and complete dissatisfaction to the entire application (noted above).
The primary objections are as follows:
1. The design proposed seems to distort the original design without
adding character or value to the entire structure. lt is true that when the
Hermans attempted to redesign the entire structure for the benefit of each duplex
owner, they failed to satisfy Ms. Adam with the solution they and their architect
created, but did sincerely address the values and potential for each owner. This
proposal clearly does not.
2. Enclosing the third level balcony only makes bad massing worse.
3. The new entry roof proposes to shed snow and ice onto the Herman
property near the entry which does not exist today. lt logically would not be legal
for such a condition to be created.
4. Further encroachment into a pre-existing non-conforming use is not
acceptable and the excuse of steep slope is out of context with the proposal as
designed.
5. While the rear yard is identified as too steep, it is no steeper than the
side yard which is proposed for new construction.
PHONET 197O) 476-o07 5. FAXr l97O) 476-o07 8. E-MAIL bdc(rvail net
-2-NIay 1 1, 1998
6. A hardship has not been demonstrated for the variance requested. lt
is our experience that the Town of Vail has historically treated variance hardships
very seriously. Many special uses, separations and variances have been
thoroughly and completely denied due to a finding of a lack of hardship with this
range of topography and the remaining alternatives to quality redevelopment.
This site offers other opportunities for expansion and redevelopment, particularly
if each owner cooperates with the other. The granting of this variance will be the
grant of a special privilege.
7. The granting of the variance will be materially injurious both in the
practical and monetary sense, to properties in the vicinity, Unit B.
8. In attempting to respond to the request by Ms. Adam to approve her
remodel plans to Unit A, the Hermans became aware that an application had
been filed with the Town of Vail to approve of the same plans he had been sent
personally for approval. Mark Donaldson was then sent the same reduced plans
and began to request a copy of the application that had been filed from Fritzlen
Pierce Briner and the Town of Vail. He was then sent the same plans he already
had from the Town of Vail and FPB referred the request to Ms. Adam who sent
him a third copy of the same plans with no attachments. Now having three sets
of the same reduced plans with no attachments, he continued to request a copy
of the application that had been filed and was sent a copy of the Staff Report on
May 7th, but not a copy of the application. Again the application was requested
and received on May 8th. This variety of information poses the following
questions:
9. The Public Hearing Notice speaks to a side and front yard setback
variance request. What about the side yard and is the Notice technically
correct?
10. The townhouse declaration provides that the owners of Unit A and
Unit B own the common area jointly. lt also provides that an owner can not make
a structural or design change without the written consent of the owner. The
Hermans have previously responded to the applicant stating that they do not
approve of the proposed changes. The Town of Vail has required such
provisions to be complied with if there is joint ownership of the property into
which the construction will encroach. An arbitration proceeding is presently
pending in regard to said issue.
Sin
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
May 11, 1998
A request for a front setback variance, to allow for an additional 3{oot
encroachment into the front setback (on an existing house 6' into the front
setback) for a residential addition, located at 706 Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail
Village 6th Filing.
Applicant: Nancy Adam, represented by Dale Smith of Fritzlen Pierce BrinerPlanner: Christie Barton
I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, Nancy Adam, is requesting a variance f rom Title 12, Chapter 6D-6 in order to
construct a new elevator and to expand the living space of the house, for a total addition of 1,010
square feet. An exterior stairway will also be added to access level 2. The ground level will be
expanded to accommodate the elevator and mechanicals (1 '12 SF addition with 12 SF in the f ront
setback); level 2 will have the elevator and a storage closet (85 SF addition); level 3 will enclose
the deck area, construct a new deck, expand the dining area and replace a timber retaining wall
with a concrete wall (461 SF addition with 82 SF in the front setback). Level 4 will expand the
living space by enclosing a deck, constructing a new deck and adding two dormers.
The duplex was originally built in 1980 and located on the north edge ol the lot due to steep
slopes. The regulations in effect at the time of construction allowed a 10' front setback due to the
407" slope.
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning:
Lot Size:
Standsrd Allowed
GRFA: 7,525 sq. ft.
Primary Unit: nla
Secondary Unit: 3,095 sq. ft.
Building Height: 33'
Setbacks:20' (front)
Site Coverage: 8,775 sq. ft. (15%)
Landscaping: 35,099 sq. ft. (60%)
Primary/Secondary Residential District
58,498 sq. ft./1.342 acres
Existino
6,171 sq. ft.
3,452 sq. ft.
2,719 sq. ft.
9' (front)
2,970 sq. ft. (5.1'l.)
52,s00 sq. ft. (89%)
Proposed
7,181 sq. ft.
4,462 sq. ft.
No change
JJ
6' (front)
3,619 sq. ft. (6.2"/")
5l ,804 sq. ft. (88.s%)
Parking:no change
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A VAFIANCE REOUEST
Upon review ol Section 12-17-6, Variance Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested front
yard setback variance. The recommendation for approval is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The proposed encroachment into the setback of the front entryway will
have minimal impacts on existing or potential uses and structures in the
area. The project will not impact adjacent property owners as the house
will remain a residential use.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement ol a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the obiectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
Due to the existing steep slopes on the property, stall believes that this
proposal will not be a grant of special privilege. Many of the homes in the
area are built close to the road in order to reduce the impact to this site
and these changes will be minor. ll an addition was done in the rear of the
house, unnecessary site disturbance would need to occur. Limiting
disturbance in lhe area of steep slopes to the rear of the structure will
reduce the potential for erosion and damage to the environment.
3. The ettect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will have little or no effect on these issues. This proposal
maintains the residenlial atmosphere of the neighborhood.
B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before
grantinga variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or wellare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specilied
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Title.
2.
e
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The slrict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Upon review of Title 12, Chapter'17 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Community
Development Department recommends approval of the proposed variance, subject to the
following findings:
1. That the granting ot the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be delrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinily.
3. That there are exceplions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in
tne same zone.
The recommendation of approval is also subject to the following condition:
1. That the applicant shall maintain a limit of disturbance line as shown on the site
plan. No building additions shall be allowed beyond this line in the future. This
limit of disturbance and any associated variances will become obsolete if the
duplex is demolished and rebuilt.
l:/everyone/pec/memos€8/Adam.5' 1
iifiR'E;E$ il gFo#st nolD tod d
ll|'
iee
5fip
.llJ I
nrq
gl
b
tIt
I
I
t
I
I
I
tt
!
I{
I
t
t
I
IJ
5I
I
I
I
it
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
:l
I
II
I
It
tI
It
I
t
-l
I
:l
!i
I
I
I
II
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:l
!i
--*<-L--{I I tlr
-1_-L--i *2-;R
tdl
I
t
F
h
rl
l:t;il!r::tF
iiiili
$l *n
ti
Ij-
'w-r \-:
.-rt
<J-rs
*+\ -\-\)
,\5(E-
Bq
n/
!
a
r
$
I
t
$p
IE
[iIII[
o
i<
Tt
!"r
ffiJl
)
(Ls
+,1J
,
6E
$iIi
rE
HLI !.
l.'| ,.'-
| ,/a
I
fi
o*P
(w,{'z}
ifF8:i.)itTL)'i'y.,fr.-j4. iI ::-::>
w .ls#' .9;"s8,-"',..:
ffit
84
/(-.-- I
.24,--1 g4 3
(n
s.!
tI
lr
I
I
I
irlr
nh
:l!
llI
Ti
_F
z
I!l
It
tltl
I
-J-_T
l_I
_Ll-
ll
tl
t a---------rtlllllll
o.
Ii
ti
======jft-,l--
j=h
_fi_ t[
qs
--:---:----fr-=-i-I-l-
l*tffiffimlt
-l -ffiiJ'ffi
t-] Ert-l-l-\.i llFJ:ir | |Cl lloll ' o nl l*l I_______T______ ttr rt | | |
-l-l--:-Ii--l--l-t/rltl
--+--I
O
oo
/T\vt
@ilr
iir
_t'
--lal
o-l
il''ft'
t1I
ru
ilo
r li
l0 ii
lIi
PT-
fl
@
9:,-
oo
@---o--
@--
@--
o--
e5t
[xP
ll ,-#/-
f--l!I
;t
$i
t li
lE
o
$r
s
I
?
$e
{i
I
erl9
ffi
f
ffi
q
I
t!
@-e-
@-
@-+tX
!5
ET
I
-----\-------\i
@-
@-l-l
$$t3
tI
j!
I
I
I
I
Jql
:l
rti
1lo
o
-l'l
fr$
e--
*
I
I
@--
@--o--H
@-o--
@---
$
@----
L--_J}J
o-
o-
*il.
lrttBSrHsoo
Community Development Plan Rou
o
ting Form
Approved Denied (cite detailed reasons) _x-Approved with conditions
a
Greg Hall, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works
Mike McGee, Fire
Routed To:
Christie Barton, Community Development
Date Routed:
Proiect Name:
706 Forest Road
Lot 9, Block l, Vail Village 6'h Filing
Setback variance request-front setback? (It looks like the side setback to me)
COMMENTS
l.)Please provide a stamped topographic survey to determine grading andretainingwalls around the new addition.
2.)Show how drainage is addressed.
PEC ok
TL Partch received 4ll6198 retumed 4/20/98
f:\everyo tE\domvoulfonn
ZONE CHECK
5-64s
Legal description: Lot / rmng vv b+b
Address' 7-d
* 675 = 425 credit plus 250 addition
Does this request involve a 250 Addition? rJO
How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this request?
?ffiO+:W = zbtl 5rSe
3>
20'
15'
l5'
4ZVdO -11u
Site coverage 16o1'
Height
Setbacks
a+74
polorl
Front
Sides
Rear
3', /6',
73 o
_j__q_V'tg G'7rt7^'1
ZZ-t lb
z r5'
o6a(tL?05Landscaping
Retaining Wall Heighe
Parking
Garage Credit
Driveryay
Complies with TOV Lighting Ordinance
Are finished gndes less than 2:1 (50%)
Environmental,4lazards
Yes_y'._
Yes-
1) Percent Slope
Enclosed
No-
No-
1.rlov"1, @,>ffiI^
^)
(./2) Floodplain
3) Wetlands NO
NO
r'/0
Minimum 36tyl
^i^ r- lRequjred- NQ-C @-
(300) (600) (e00) (1200)t.-b C'1,'.1
I
Permined rrop"L9ffWposed slope
-%
4) Water Coune Setback (30) (5$ / /R
5) Geologic Hazards
a) SnowAvalanche
b) Rockfall
c) Debris Flow
hevious conditions of approval (check property fileL--
Is the property non-conforming? Describe:
NA
DE SI GN REVIEW CIIECKLIST
A SURVEY
/
"/
,/
./
/
ttAIA
4_e
J
-/
./
-rz-
tr SITEPLA}I
/
,,/
/
;
,/
./
t/
Scale
Benchmark
Legal description
Lot Size
BuildableArea
Ease,ments
Topography
100 yr. flood plain
Water Couse Setback
Envirronmental Hazards
Trees
Utility locations
Spot elwations
Scale
BuildingHeight
EncroacbmenE
Setbacks
Site Coverage
EaveVOverhangs (4')
Decks/Balconies
Garage connection
Site Grade\Stope
ReainingWalls
Fences
ParkingiGarage
Turning Radius
Driveway (access and gnde)
Snow Storage
Fire Access
I
."/
llt CondoApproval
4t
dle
-lt
'/
r'[*
,/
,./
lJz Memoto Housing Planner if a'n
,,./
.,/
t/
O FLOORPIAT.IS
(/ Scale
'l/t/ GRFA
,/
d4
4/l 2s}additionalGRFA
C)awl\Attic Space
EHU
Q BTJILDINGELEVATIONS
/u Scale
,/ ColorMaterials
,/ RoofPitch
tr LAI.IDSCAPEPLA}I
Z- Existingtee.s
/ Proposednees
./ Legend
MISCELLANEOUS
Title report (A & B)
Utility verification fomr
Photos ofsite
Building material sarnples
C.O. Verification
Sun\ShadeAngles
Utilities (underground)
ViewConidon
Variances
Plat restrictions
EHU is proposed
79tu4?&W7 P.@7
Cilr|artalrnieg*f,a4?*2t3t
ArtDtr{vrr(}xulilTrl'.
@E" "FFarcl<h
irer ry pr[ccr nq*io3 qrs?d ty tu Phrdl3fid Bti
fdcJifo. r* g--*-,ff.tr.f+eountrfu ttcptbtrrrfittal ||qFf
ruriloF
Cmdln-Fc*6
TL{$trFdbr
raorFrt d dl rqful ifuu ir nHltsd- Trspotctqr dro old bonviamdtly tbTo*t€mc!
rdlr6cDotDRcrtorBa{
APFIICATIOIF|ON,
TYTE(FriFTJCAII(*{:cl Add|idcRFA(Zto)EI Bcd,rdffilf GdrldusFtrolEl lrl1lcc Elrea&iftrldo
EI Rdqstr qFvdncc
F vtreEl Znigc{*rsH
D8$mIPIt(yN (]F TflB B.BqltBSn 'A/,'o/L
CUP/?A'Z,? /K)
LOCAIIfhIOFPROFOSAL:
Affilp AtgorEdDilr{.lEdllr
eq|oP tht(rlrs ,. \
llrjcctl CClbicAtEdo
(Vrit
MC*ctr Of,trEdsrtlHio
tr XdcaEl Ail-aGdrodSB
,UL ,r2al
flAr( ao3. -1'?o
trfl*91
qrzf'
wr3-H.ffi.-J-VA/L y/QJOE (t,"
gtl
El
tr
E
tl.
( UJr'c to(
TDTAL P.A1
D.
E"
F.
G,
^Dw,q* 7ol" F{zEtf fuAP .- "ry.nr'ollrc
ZOIIIN(}
NATGOFWTq(s|:
(}wlEnfi)se{A
.NAIIE(F
FE' - G nra $bunrAr-*Bqurrnfiirrs Fn rrrri
SUmT 1f,lr lrilJCArG{, ILL gm[|ITrAI.
Dfllilmm fr lllr5ltrrffi:r DGYE/tpI,lEltI, ?lt
YiNLGOD(ilADOtfffrr.
04/09/98 08:11 TXIRX N0.2402 P.00r
13 Apr 1998
Town of Vail
Planning and Environmental Commission
Re; Adam Residence Variance Request.
ARCHITECTS
The variance request is based on the fact that the home is currently built within the front setback
limits of the property. We are proposing a small addition to a portion of the front of the
residence, which by definition will be "increasing an existing non-conforming" item. To respond
to those issues noted on the PEC application;
1. Given the minimal proposed addition to the residence (see plans), we feel this has no
impact on the Town's development objectives.
2. No issues noted here are impacted.
3. No issues noted here are impacted.
4. In terms ofcharacter ofthe building and surrounding area;
The building is currently of a 1970's contemporary style. It was built, apparently,
prior to the crurent zoning requirements. Due to the steep hillside in which the house was
constructed, it was placed closer to the street. The proposed addition actually only in-fills an
existing exterior deck, therefor not altering the existing implied mass.
The proposed dormer and fenestration begin to alter the appearance only is a much as reflecting
the current "alpine" aesthetics, as well as greatly reduce the visual scale of the elevations. The
addition impacts views from no other adjacent property.
The reasoning for the addition being located as it is proposed is due to the existing site slope and
terrain. Providing an addition to the east is the only legitimate area of potenfial expansion. The
addition only slightly impacts the front setback as noted above.W
Dale Smith
Architect
(/zrsw-,7r:-,
(ldrtQi Funa"''
ealy'
)
lr//
K:\9747-Adam\PECO4 I 398.wpd
PlanningaArchitectureolnteriors
1650EastVail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 . Vail,CO81657 r fpb@colorado.net . fax (970\ 4764901 . (97O\ 476-6342
JqF]l-gB-gB tBstE FFOI|: LA'|D TTTLE CUAPANTEE III ' t9?o47Et4534
vv
PAGE 3/9
Thc irformation below is effective through tvltrch 25, 1998. The addresscs shown firaJt
not bc current. For ctrnemt addresscs coiltact the Eagle County Assessors office.
Lot 5At Block 2 Lionshead Partners
12770 Merit llr. , Suite 4@
Ddlas. TX 75251
Lot 58, Block 2 Tec<as Tetwisiorq Inc.
One Shoreline Plaza, Sirite 2700 South
Corpus Christi, TX 78401
Lot 6.'4, Block 2 Roger V. And Sally M Cadol
t9 Donaldson St.
Fort Bragg- NC 28307
I-ot 68, Block 2 Colmar, ANeur lersey Gcncral Ptnshp
251 Fowlcr Road, Farl:Ells
Somersel NI 07931
Lot 8, Block I Neil R. And NanryR. Austrian
22BallwoodRoad
Old Grccnrlich. CT 06870
Lot 9C. Blook I Micbael E. Artd Karcn M. Herman
6201 Waru Parlnray
Kansas Ciw. MO 64101
Lot l0A Block I MchaclD. Erickson
5980 Pinc Grovc Road
Edina- MN 55a36
Lot l0B, Block 1 Cbarlcs S. Ackerrnan
1130 W€st ConmyRoad
Nonlnnsst, GL3O377
04/08/98 15:05 Tx/Rx N0.2384 P.003 I
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that ihe Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on May ll, 1998, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for front and side setback variances, to allow a proposed residential addition, located
at 2625 Larkspur Lane/Lot 1 , Block 2, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Shawn WeyrauchPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for front and side setback variances, to allow for a proposed residential addition,
located at 706 Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th.
rpplicant: Nancy Adam, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Architects
TDnner: Christie BartonI
A request for a minor CC1 ederior alteration, to allow for a change 1o previously aPp_rolqq ..
plans, located at 286 Bridge Street, A & D Building/Lois A & B and Part of C, Block 5-A, Vail
Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Lee Hollis, Golden Bear Store
Planner:George Ruther
A request for a setback variance, to allow for a deck expans_lon, located at 83 Willow Place,
Rivei House Condominiums/Lot 3, Block 6, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: MFI Investments, represented by Larry Deckard
Planner:Dominic Mauriello
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unil, located at
45 Forest Road/Lot 33, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: BMS ParlnershiP
Planner: Christie Barton
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular'office hours in the project planner's 'office
located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
Community Development Department
Published April24,1998 in the VailTrail.
April 13, 1998
Adam Residence
Zoning Study
Zonrng District; Primary/Secondary
Lot Size:58,498 Square Feet
Site Coverage Allowed (20o/o); I1,700 Square Feet
Gross Residential Floor Area (GMA) Allowed
25%o of ftst 15,000 sf (.25 x 15,000) :3,750
l0% ofnext 15,000 sf(.1 x 15,000) = 1,500
ARCHITECTS
5o/o of wea in excess of 30,000 sf (58,498-30,000 :28,498 x .05) : 1,425 sf
Total Base GRFA:6.675 sf
Total GRFA Allowed
Primary Unit (60%):4,680 sf
Secondary Unit(40% max) = 3,345 sf
Existing GRFA
Primary Unit: 3,452 sf
Secondary Unit: 2,719 sf
Remaining GRFA
Primary Unit: 1,228 sf
Secondary Unit = 626 sf
Garage Allowance - 600 sf per unit
Existing Garage Use
Primary Unit - 515 sf
Secondary Unit - 452 sf
Tolal GRFA added to Livable area:
Primary Unit = 1010 sf
SecondaryUnit-0sf
Total GRFA added to Garage:
Primary Unit - 85 sf
Secondary Unit: 0 sf
Total GRFA for each category is within the allowance required.
K :\974 7-Adam\Contract\grfa#2.wpd
PlanningoArchitectureolnteriors
1650 EastVail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 . Vail-CO81657 o fpb@colorado.n et . fax lgTol 476-4901 . (g7O) 476-6342
Io
IL
rtl
nNqo$[H
oz
={
luil.
luo
il_
llJ
o\)
llJF
6
Ros
Atu
oJudPsff
.f; s
u6 Ir(\J aFtU J9; t
r
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
\i\\1 ,\I It3\r9_u _l
' revtsed LOl5l92'(
I.
o
EPPLTCATION FOR A \IARI.NICE
This procedure is required for any project requesting avariance. The application will not be accepted until allinformation is submitted.
Application Date
PEC MEETING DATE
A.NAME oF APPLrcAnr, l?4/vc/ A2A/4
ADDRE55 +? 15 E. pre€Ep.lE Cf
owNER(S) (rype or prlnr\ A/r'NC/ &//t?24 ,4,D1
srcNAruRE (s, ,5& ./\raurg? 2/:c lY24
PHONE
D.LOCATION
BLOCK /
OF PROPOSAL:
FILING
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO}": LOT q
}rjJ l-'Jl"IT D D
E. FEE $25O. OO PAID cK#
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. Stamped, addressed envelopes of the names of owners ofaII property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDING
PROPERTY BEHIND AND AcRosS STREETS, and a lisI of theirnames and maiLing addresses. THE AppLICANT WILL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILTNG ADDRESSES.
rr. A pre-application conference with a planning staff mernber isstrongly suggested to determine if any additionalinformation is needed. No application will be acceptedunless it is complete (nust include al1 items required bythe zoning administrator). It is the applicant'sresponsibility to make an appointment with the staff to findout about additionaL submittal resuirements.
]II, PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPI.ETE APPLICATION W]LL STREAMLINE THEAPPROVAL PROCESS TORTG-FNOJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBEROF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATE. ATLar/\rt^Th-^rtUUNUI..I'I.UN5 oF APPRoVAL MUST BE CoMPLIED WITH BEFoRE ABUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED.
FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THEVARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION IWOLVED. THE
STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
1. The relationship of the requested variance toother existing or potential uses and structures inthe vicinitv.
BY
?2r2;',U/JqtO y't4zlrr aa ZUztrnona 361 7?O538a
ADDRESS
,fut a &a5,^ pHoNE_/7z__o 3fr-
NAME oF AppLrcANy s REpRESENra.rwt frrf26t //Qd H/,uElL
/b56 /i. lr'/C b//U{/ t2A ku/.,e//2. ' I€-/
C. NAME OF
OWNER (S)
ADDRESS
a?-2a-L935 A7:31PN FR3t1
t'rh"
"rtdf'J DBdTCiIf
IJ L'17@4761?,23 P. E at
lwllir'BAiRD AFtLlot?ro[t -rotrr! or vltL, @LoRtDo
DATE IT'CETVID:
DITE OF DRA IFf,TtrTIG:aattrallart
rtt llrrlrl \t6
I,
t.
A.
c.
D.
Q.
r.
T.
.t'
:rcuscq -mrl'rqrO$.:
DESCREPIIDr|r
f.lGfL DISCnII'TION: t,oB
Srtbdlvlctorr
Block
e tnects Btd. bouDds l€Ealon 3 rep.ra>.e tllcct rnd attagh
s
Y
It groperty is deaeribed'bydage"tpLioB, Itle.lsC provideco thi! apDlicat,ion,
xAr4 0Fl|al.ltttt
NN{e 0tl,tallinq IDDL'EA!|5' g
Addrctgl
HrHs or rmflf {91:
OElratl SrGqrurlt
tpPDtul?Ioru f,flIit rw s! prcesgg&t rrwom omEnrs stfintutt
Condcqirlte rpprovrl irt ap'gticabte .
nRF FB8: DBB_fees, ts rhoun tbgve, :rre to bc peid at UhEtttl| of 'rjhittill of .the Dng apPltcarton. tater. wtrendgDlylog for a butldlng pemitr plcase ideatlfy the accuratcvrllrttiofr of tha propo6r1. fhe ttown of vail wlll adjuct ttrercf aecor6laE to thc tablc beio,r. to e!!ur€ tha corraet fa€lr pald.
Irl,8CEBPF!:yALUltroDt o-t ro,ooo010.001 -l 50,000t50,001 "t 150,000ll50,0o:. - | 500,ooof500,001 - $t,000.090I Ovcr ll,O00,oO0
9!!lor rEtrrEr EoilD ADpBOnlt tirrrltlTlgIrrl Et<r r turortml Plrut! iitr lErrtrD,
rBE
s 20_00I S0.00
t100.00
3200.00tr00.o0
tso0.o0
osc rEAn tFrun tanLttruD ro e8sTrlilJftc
E.
P.
zoul$c? htfe<^ -
APPLre.lNr: €lddrglsr
rOTflL F. i
V IrrST OF MATERIAIJS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT_I BT,OCK suBDrvrsron VV. hf+..
STREET ADDRESS:
The fol.lowing informat.ion is reguired for submiE.t.al to t,he Design
Review Board before a final approval can be given:
OFA.COI,ORBUIIJDING II!.ATERIALS :
Roof
Siding
Other wall MaLerials
Fascia
Soffits
windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
"ur,U or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Ret.aining WalLs
ExLerior Lighting
Other
TYPE MATERIAIJ
Designer:
Phone:
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of
Single Family
ZONE CHECK
. FOR
Residence, Duplex, Pr
ZONE DISTRICTS
o
imary
BUILDABI,E
Exis Linq
/Secondary
Subdivision
P}IONE
PI{ONEARCHITECT
ZONE DISTRICT
1F,B' '*9:-neiehcJ$31
TOt,Al GRFA
E,ltdo (A) Prirnary GRFA
N,gtde Ca) secondary GRFA
Setbacks
PRoPosED usn Pl9
Lor srzg l,?hoto ar =8211? \LOT AREA
Proposed ToLaIAllowed
(30) (33)
+ 425 =-5131_ fu+ 40 30M
20'
15',
15',
Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
complies wj.th T.o.v.
wat,er coursc Setback
Do Finish Grades Exceed 2:1
Ilnv i ronrnen t.a 1,/Hazards :
YES
Slope t
No
NO
1)
/-t
'l\
trlood PIain
PercenL Slope (< > 30%)
Geologic rlazardsa) Snow Avalanche
b) Rockfall
c) Debris Flow
4) Wetlands
View Corridor EncroachmenL: Yes NO,
Does Lhis reqriesL invoive a 230 riddiLiolr?
How much of Lhe allowed 250 Addition is used wich chis
Previous condiLions of approval (cbeck property file):
0cques
V.
DA'E: Yeb.zz ,qv
I,EGAL DESC PTION: Lot,
ADDRESS:
OI^INER
)6tt +- tft B?o+ 5('bl +o 6tDl
EtL
3i4'b
FronL
Sides
Rear
+ lE --h!Lb_ Lh,"o Ltt5T
r' si ue coverage Tbolo t Ar+ LlTo 4p ^.btc
Landscaping
ReLaining waII lleights 3t /gt
b neqra
(3oo) (aool tsoolffiDl-
Permitted Slope % ProPosed
Lighting Ordinance Yes
e-L? /!!:Qt+
10
E?
E$ff
I
I
Hr-o$F
{
5
$-
f$
.l=
:10
i11
t*
l1{
IF
ttc
ryF@'Pa_w, lerpp?y.
. 81657 303.
$ff
f-llF- -
p
q
$
FN
l$
F
I
I
AJ"AM ?ft16>6=-
h,gn Review Action ttrn
TOWN OF VAIL
catesory Numbe{Jt-:
,/
PrgectName: frd(wtS
Building Name:
Description:,7,
ArchilecVOontact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot ? Bbck
Projest Street Address:
Comments:
Motion by;
Board / Staff Action
Vote:
Seconded by:
! Approval
Ll Disapproval
TffGtatrRpprovat
Conditions:
L,.,/'fl .'l *<- , /'' ? f DRB Fee pre-paa",eu (10 I k
TE-:3@!-E4S-8353 REgiFT 9ERUICEE*'*;::";
t" EomD rppr.rcarrn - Ferr op
Dmr rtctlurE^TF OF gll TE:rIlEil...aOOll,
vlill!.GiltrftE
r *t r tr r-riEI
A.
tf+ftcF, rH_rgEF .E5or..
n.rrfi 0F r|Yltts;
---49-gg[.|tnrction {t}00.00t
-"-.,;r'ddittat l160. onl -Kx*or lrrer+El,oo,- coFccyuBr acv3cu {1r0.00trt0lc.
D.
E.
Fr
t.
lnn8es$i
tlctrL
Edr6lvirlos :. ldc
t€ prcperrr Is CsecrL5og 5rr,doacri ptL66r ptdajs DrovidaLo lhiE rDptlcrtioO.
I nGGt Oad, 5q|rDdr 1q|r,oqre eqrelrt'e rbFeE |!al lttlc,b
igul|lrRi !
Mt{E Atutlt iag J|rFlJClI{i!
lddsa-E!
'tt.
.t--F.:
I
rq.tll! uFllo5llnq APFIiIO,,TI*T'Jrddrclli
ilru{E qr f,Dt8(r} I
-qFfiilst Jrdfliqgrst !:
ntfufctfronr nl,h+ twr rrtfoT rmrs trgqtba
:condffiirirtrr rFprdvar il appltsabl..
huE TEE: DRE !q€8, cs ongr rbcvc.l rr8 tg be llrll1l at Cbrrlrc of firbRtlErl €!.Ll.e B,B-tppftF.Eicql. &LEE8. rtcq[IrF, yl ng ?or q btr i.hliug p|!rllr,-,- pflerc ldosElnl'Flylng ?OF e brr ildjtJ.lg p|lfrrlt, E't-rtc ld€gEtly BltO I.lEUtr EevaluaBlou of thc proposal . Ttr* tum o! Y.rl rlu |dlufE Eba$Jurl, Elrfco .ccoEoinq En r.hc r!!ln bethr. ta t[gu!! tE cotttct ltail Dii6,
ItriF
e
llE#c'lrrDlr,la. VTLSiTTIODI? s I iorDoc+rurool'f to.truo
|50.001 .+ 190,0oCfllu.ool, . f )0o.0uo
fs00.o0r - tl.coo{000S gt$r 11,C00r000
nitslclf RfirEEf il:rn! AED|'fl|I}Ir EEIIll
,rI?&uVeL llu.r$s r DUTIfIllC *AET 13
rrt fntrlD,
ttl
+ rcrile| 3T.0e
tleo,0{l2!9-9s,. 1100.00'tt0c.0e
eIE llll'rrtTr tnell
SSFEID rrD df,irffi
I
DRB IPPLICATION
DATE APPLICATION RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB UEETING:
*****T'ITIS APPIJICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL TNFORMATTON
IS SUBI.{ITTED*****
I.PRE-APPLICATION }TEETING :
A pre-application neeting with a planning staff menber is
strongly suggested to determine if any additional
information is needed. No application will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items recruired by
the zoninq administrator). It is the applicantrsresponsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additional subnittal requirements. Please note
that a COMPLETE application vill streamline the approval
process for your project by decreasing the nurnber of
conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL
conditions of approval nust be resolved before a building
perroit is issued. Application witl not be processed
without Ownerrs Signature.
A. PROJECT DESCRIT{TION:
OF PROPOSAL:B,I.OCATION
Address
Legal Descriptj-on
Subdivision
C. NAME OF APPLICANT:
Mailing Address:
Phone ?/o-.ez- ( car-.)
APPLICANTTS REPRESENTATM: >;1 4a-t' -D.NAI,TE OF
MaiI_ing Address:
E.NAME OF OWNERS:
SIGNATURE (8) :
Mailing Address:
F.DRB FEE: The fee witl be paid at the time a building
FEE
$ 10.00
$ 2s.00
$ 5O.Oo
g1oo. 00
$200. O0
$300. O0
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBI.TISSIONS TO THE DRB:
A. In addition to neeting subnrittaL requirements, the
applicant must stake the site to indicate.property
tines and building corners. Trees that will be removed
must also be rnarked. This work must be completed
before the DRB visits the site.
permit is recruested.
VALUATION
$ 0-9 1O,OOO
$1O,OO1 -9 5O,OOO
950,001 -S 15O,OOo
$150,001 - $ 5OO,0Oog5oo,oo1 - $1,ooo,ooo
$ Over $1r 000,0OO
a
Zoning
Phone r'26- !o78
II.
-,
B.The review process for NEw BUIL,DINGS will nornally
involve two separate meetings of the Design Review
Coard, so the lpplicant should plan on at least two
meetings for a final aPProval .
Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review
il;;e-;g their schedured-ieeting and who have not asked
for a postponement wilt be reguired to be republished'
At the discretion of the zoning adroinistrator' the
iollowlng items nay not have to be presented to the
Design n6view Board. They, however, have to be -tres6ntea to the Planning Departrnent for approval:
a. Windows, skylights and sinilar exterior changes
that do not-alter the existing plane of the
building; and
b. Building additions that are not viewed from any
other tot or public space, which have had letters
subnitted froin adjoining property owners approvLng
the addition; andTor appr-val frorn the agent for'
or manager of a condouriniun association'
You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies
on youi propeity. You should check with a Town Planner
before proceeding.
c.
D.
E.
I
t
I.
I{ATERIAL TO BE SUBI'{ITTED
NEW CONSTRUCTION
A. firo copies of a topooraphic rnap and site plan at a
scale of 1rr = 2ot or larger, of the site containing the
following:
1. Licensed surveyorrs stamp.
2. contour intervals of not more than 2r unless the
parcel consists of 6 acres or nore, in which case,
5r contour intervals may be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks
with diarueters of 4tr or more one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural
features (large boulders, internittent streams,
etc. ) .
5. Avalanche areas, centerline of stream or creek,
creek or stream setback, l00-year flood pJ.ain and
slopes of 4ot or more, if applicable.
6. Ties to existing benchrnark, either USGS landnark
or segrer invert.
7. Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site,
showing size and tlpe of culverts, swales,
etc.
b. Exact locations of aIl. utilities to include
existing sources and proposed service 'l ines
from sources to the structure. Utilities to
include:
Cable TV
Telephone
c. Property lines
and a basis of
Sewer Gaswater Electric
showing distances and bearings
bearing
8.
9.
d. Proposed driveways with percent slope and
spot elevations
e. AII easenents (Title report must also include
existing easernent locations)
Existing and finished grades.
All existing and proposed irnprovements including
structures, landscaped areasr service areas,
storage areas, wal.ks, driveways, off-street
parking, loading areas, retaining walls (with spot
elevations of top and bottom of walls), and other
site inprovements.
Elevations of top of roof ridqes (with existing
and proposed grades shown underneath) to deternj'ne
height of building. AII ridge lines should be
indicated on the site plan.
10.
B.Landscape Plan (lrt = 2Or or larger) ' 2
1. Show the location of 4rt diarneter or
other shrubs and native plants that
site and the location and design of
landscape areas with the varietiesplant rnaterials indicated.
copies required
larger trees,are on the
proposed
and sizes of
NOTE:
2. Courplete the attached landscape materials list.
3. Designate all trees to be saved and aII those to
be rernoved.
As much of the above infornation as possible should be
indicated on the site plan, so that the inter-relation
of the various components is clear. The landscape plan
should be separate. The existing topographic and
vegetational characteristics may be shown on a separate
map. The apolicant rnust stake the site to show lot
lines and buildinq corners. Trees that will be lost
during construction rnust be taoqed. The work rnust be
completed before the DRB site visit.
Siqnature from each utilitv companv verifying location
of service and availability (see attached).
Prelirninarv titLe report to accompany aII subnittals,
to insure property ownership and aII easements on
property.
Architectural Plans (L/4" = 1r or larger) 2 copies
required.
1. t{ust include scaled fioor plans and al1 elevations
as they will appear on conpletion. Elevations
must show both existing and finished grades.
2. one set of f loor plans rnust be rtred-l j.nedrr to show
how the GRFA was calculated.
3. Subnit one set of reduced (8 L/2x x 11rr) floor
plans, elevations and site plan for inclusion in
memos to Planning Commission and Town Council.
4. Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be
specified and submitted for review on the
materials list (attached). Color chips, siding
samples etc., should be presented at the Design
Review Board neeting.
F. Zone check list (attached) nust be conpleted if project
is zoned Sing1e-Family, Prinaryrzsecondary or Duplex.
c. The Zoning Adninistrator and/or DRB nay reguire the
submission of additional plans, drawings,
specifications, sarnples and other naterials (including
a rnodel) if deened necessary to deternine whether a
project will conply with Design Guidelines.
II. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUTLDINGS.
Photos or sketches that clearly indicate what is proposed
and the location (site plan) of the proposal nay be
submitted in Iieu of the nore forrnal requirenents given
above, as long as they provide all irnportant specifications
for the proposal including colors and materials to be used.
c.
D.
E.
of a higher inpact than single-fanily and two-farnily
residences although projects of that nature shall not
be excluded frorn the opportunity to request a
conceptual design review.
The followlng infornation shall be submitted for a
conceptual review:
a. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a nininun
scale of one inch equals twenty feeti
b. Conceptual elevations and exterior material-s and a
description of the character of the proposed
structure or structuresi
c. Sufficient inforrnation to show that the proposal
conplies with the development standards of the
zone district in which the project is to be
located (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations,
nurnber of parking spaces, etc. ) t
d. Completed application form;
e. Planning and Environmental Commission and or Town
Council approval if required.
Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for
conceptual design review, the Department of Community
Developnent shall revieht the subnitted rnaterials for
general cornpliance with the appropriate requirements ofthe zoning code. If the proposal is in basic
conpliance with the zoning code requirenents, theproject shall be fornarded to the DRB for conceptualreview. If the application is not generally in
cornpliance with zoning code reguirements, the
application and submittal materials shall be returned
to the applicant with a written explanation of the
Department of Community Developmentts findings.
The DRB shall review the application and supporting
material that has been submitted for a conceptual
review in order to determine whether or not the project
generally conplies with the design guidelines. No vote
of the DRB vrilL be required unless requested by the
applicant. The property owner or his representativeshall be present at the DRB hearing.
2.
III. ADDITIONS . RESIDENTIAL OR CO},T},TERCTAL
A. original floor plans with all specifications shown.
B. Two sets of proposed fLoor plans (L/4" = 1r or larger)for additions.
c. Trro copies of a site plan showing existing and proposedconstruction. Indicate roof ridge elevations withexisting and proposed grades shown underneath. .
D. Elevations of proposed addition. ''
E. Photos of existing structure.
F. Specifications for all materials and color samples on
rnaterials list (attached) .
At the reguest of the Zoning Adninistrator you nay also be
reguired to subnit:
G. A statement from each utility verifying location ofservice and availability. See attached utility
Iocation verification forn.
H. A site improvernent survey, stamped by registeredprofessional surveyor.
I. e preliminary title report, verifying ownershj-p ofproperty and lists of easements.
IV. FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building permit has been issued, and when theproject is underway, the following wiII be reguired before
any building receives a franing inspection from the Building
Departnent: Two copies of a certified inprovement survey
showing:
A. Building locations with ties to property corners, i.e.
distances and angles.
B. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot
c. A11 utility service lines, as-builts, showing size of
Iines, type of rnaterial used, and exact locations.
D. Drainage as-builts.
E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
F. AII property pins are to be either found or set and
stated on maP.
G. A1l easements.
H. Building fLoor elevations and all roof ridge elevations
with existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
V. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEI{
1. Submittal requirements: The owner or authorized agent
of any project requiring design approval as prescribed
by this chapter may subrnit plans for conceptual review
by the Design Review Board to the Department of
Connrunity Development. The purpose of a conceptual
review shall be to give the applicant a basic
understanding with respect to the design concept and
the compatibility of a proposal with the Design
Guidelines contained within this chapter. This
procedure is recomrnended nainly for those applications
LIST OF I.fATERIAI,S
NA].[E OF PROJECT:
STREET ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPIION: IOT- BTOCK SUBDTVISION
DESCRTPTTON OF PRO..TECT:
The following infor:mation is
Review Board before a final
A. BUILDING I'IATERIALS 3
Roof
Siding
Other WalL ltaterials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trin
Doors
Door Trim
1F!. Deck*Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chirnneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.I,ANDSCAPING: Name of
PI.ANT MATERIAI,S:
PROPOSED TREES
reguired for submittal to the Design
approval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAL COI,OR
m-/.enoz ,-:// /-ltcz-- 7-- J.Jr.kz;ta
ac€ r-./*-.--1 tA,.'-t A n ^1/ tr4 -
lo"t:- 6,n /1 - 4.-J zor'Z
Designer:
Phone:
ouantitv Size*
EXISTING TREES TO
BE RE},IOVED
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Mininun caliper for
deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous
trees. llininun heicht for coniferolls trees is 6 feet.
PLANT MATERIAL.S: Botanical Name Common Name ouantity Size*
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXTSTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Mininun size of shrubs is
5 qa}lon.
Tnoe Square Footacre
GROUND CO\rERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR I.{ETHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c. OTHER IANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swinrninq
pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwalls. Maximun height of walls within the front setback is
3 feet. l{aximun height of walls elsewhere on the property
is 6 feet.
I
@
aProject Application
Prolect Nam€:
Proiect Descrip{ion:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Logal Descriptio n: tot 7 , "ro"* / , rrrrnn
Zoning Approved:
f:i,,t/st-
.J-
Deslgn Revlew Board
7-7-EO
DISAPPROVAL
r'c ,y'-4,, ,1,
t r{1, r-z.t-+ *a{2
/ /-t
Chief Building Off icial
I.aU-'
\id4--')a-, <) at*
o
Project Application
l,/"*g ,
- Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Archit€ct Address and Phone:
q
Legal Description: Lot lo , g;e61
Zoning Approved:
Design Revlew Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Chiel Building Oflicial
.. | .: '''
602 East 8th Street
Pueblo, Colo 8.1001
(303) 54&1 1s0
P.O. Box 1427
Glenwood Springs, Coto 81601
(303) 94$6020
86 Flosemont Plaza
Montrose, Colo 81401
(303) 249-7838
P.O. Box 1 882
Grand Junction, Colo 81501
(303) 242-8968
P.O. Box 1 643
Rock Springs, Wyo 82901(307t 342-2649
1?
UrrcolnDeVore
1000 West Fillmore St.
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907(303) 632-3593
Home Office
Tridel and Company
Box l5l3Vail, CO 81657
Attn: Peter Sherowski
Re: Soils InvestigationLot 9, Block IVail Village, 5th Filing
Gentlemen:
June 5, 1980
At your request, Lincoln-Devore personnel have examined the
nature and consistency of the soils in the area of the above
referenced construction site. Two test pits were placed acrossthe site, located as shown on the enclosed Test Pit LocationDiagram. The location of the site itself has been indicated onthe enclosed General Site Location Diagran.
Although Lincoln-Devore has not seen a set of construction
drawings for the proposed single fanily dwelling unit, we feelthat it will be basically a frame structure of more or less con-ventional design. Foundation loads for structures of this nature
are normally light to nediun weight in magnitude.
Generally speaking, the foundation soils encountered during our
subsurface exploration program can be divided into a two-layersystem. The upper layer of the soiJ- profile consists of the lowplastic silts of SoiI Type No. 1. Soil Type No. I was encoun-tered at or near the present ground surface in both test pits
excavatedr iDd extended to a depth ranging frorn about 5 to 7feet. Generally speaking, Soil Type No. I is of low permeability
and low density. These soils have a slight tendency to expand
upon the addition of moisture, with swell pressures on the orderof 400 psf being considered typical. While this magnitude of
expansion should not be sufficient to affect the structural mem-bers of the building, it can cause some novement beneath lightly
loaded floor slabs on grade and other flatwork. It will have adistinct tendency to settlenent and long term consolidation uponapplication of foundation loads. Therefore, inposed foundation
Ioads should never exceed 1200 psf, and building balance should
be carefully rnaintained. Soil Type No. I contains sulfates indetrinentat quantities.
F
Vail Village
June 5, 1980
Page -2-
The second layer of the soil profile consists of the silty sandsof SoiI Type No. 2. These sands were encountered at a depth
ranging fron about 5 to 7 feet below the present ground surfacein Test Pits No. 1 and 2. soil Type No. 2 is perneable, of lowplasticity and nediun density. These soils also have a slight
tendency to expand upon the addition of noisture' with swell
pressures on the order of 300 psf being considered typical. This
nagnitude of expansion is generally sufficient to affect lightly
loaded floor sLabs on grade and other flatwork. Granularnaterials such as these have a tendency to rapidly settle under
the initial application of static foundation pressures. However,
these settlements are characteristically fairly rapid in nature,
and should be virtually conplete by the end of construction. fn
any event, if the al-lowable bearing values given in this rePort
area not exceeded, and if recommendations pertaining to
inspection, reinforcing, balancing and drainage are followed' itis felt that differential novement as a result of settlement can
be held to a tolerable magnitude. At shaLlow foundation depths
across the site, these soils were found to have an average
allowable bearing capacity on the order of 2000 psf. These soilsare relatively free of sulfates.
It is recomnended that a shallow foundation system consisting of
continuous footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spreadfootings beneath colunns and other points of concentrated load,
be used to transfer the weight of the proposed structure. Such ashallow foundation system may be designed on the basis of a maxi-
num allowable bearing capacity of 1200 psf as an overall siteaverage. A mininum pressure of 400 psf will be required.
It shouLd be noted that the term "footings'as used above inclu-
des the wall on grade or 'no footing" type of foundation system.
On this particular site, the use of a more conventional footing,the use of a "no footing", or the use of voids will dependentirely upon the foundation loads exerted by the structure.
This site is on a relatively steep slope (up to approximately 67percent). Although the site appeared stabl-e at the tine of theinspection, it is felt that lateral movement in the forrn of a
gradual downslope creep can be anticipated. This gradual
downslope novement will- create a strong potential for differen-tial rnovement throughout the structure. Therefore, opposingexterior l-oad bearing walls should be cross-connected to provide
additional rigidity.
where a shallow foundation system is used, we would recommendthat the contact stresses be balanceil beneath the foundation
cotnponents. t{ost buildings are invariably more heavily loaded on
sone walls and colunns than on others. The amount of thisvariation nay tend to be quite high. We would recommend that thesize of the foundation component be varied in direct relationshipto the actual load being carried, thus maintaining approximately
Vail Vlllage
June 5, 1980
Page -3-
the same pressure on the soil at all points. Using the criterionof dead load only for single story structures or dead load plus
one-half live load for multi-story structures and structures con-taining basements, we would reconmend that the contact stresses
beneath the load bearing walls be balanced to witbin +300 psf atall points beneath the foundation wall. Isolated interior column
pads should be designed for pressures of about 150 psf more thanthe average of the pressures beneath the load bearing walls.
To help ensure that the structure moves more or less as a singleunit rather tban in a differential manner, we would reconmendthat all stem walls be supported by a grade beam capable of
spanning at least 15 feet. This grade bean would apply to bothinterior and exterior load bearing walls. Such a grade beam
should be horizontal-Iy reinforced continuously around the struc-ture with no gaps or breaks in reinforcing steel unl-ess they arespecially designed. Beams should be reinforced at both the top
and the botton with the najor reinforcenent being placed near the
botton of the section. A11 interior bearing walls should rest ona grade beam and foundation systen of their own and should not be
allowed to rest on a thickened slab section or nshovel" footing.
Where the sten walls are relatively shallow, vertical reinforcingwill probably not be necessary. Eowever, where the walls retainsoil in excess of about 5 feet in height, vertical reinforcing
may be necessary to resist the active pressure of the soils alongthe wall exterior. to aid in designing such verticalreinforcing, the following equivalent fluid pressures can beutili zed:
Soil Type No. I - 50 pcf
Soil Type No. 2 - 32 pcf
It should be noted that the above values should be modified totake into account any surcharge loads applied at the top of thewalls as a result of stored goods, live loads on the floor,
machinery, or any other externally applied forces.
Should the building be cut into the hi1lside, the uphill wallwill be a retaining wall. This wall must be designed to retainthe bank. The equivalent fluid pressures provided above can be
used for the purpose of designing this wall.
Where floor slabs are used, they may be placed directly on gradeor over a compacted gravel blanket of 4 to 6 inches in thickness.
Under no circunstances should this gravel pad be al-lowed to act
as a water trap beneath the floor slab. A vapor barrier is
recornmended beneath any and all floor slabs on grade which willlie below the finished exterior ground surface. A11 fill placed
beneath the interior floor slabs must be compacted to at least
90* of its maximun Proctor dry density, ASTM D-598.
VaiI VilLage
June 5, 1980
Page -4-
All floor slabs on grade nust be constructed to act independentlyof the other structural portions of the building. These fl-oorslabs should contain deep construction or contraction joints tofacilitate even breakage and to help minimize any unsightlycracking which could result fron differential movement. Floor
slabs on grade should be placed in sections no greater than 25feet on a side. Prior to constructing slabs on grade, allexisting topsoil and organics must be removed from the buildinginterior. Likewise, aII foundations nust penetrate the topsoil
layer.
Any interior, non-load bearing partitions which will be
constructed to rest on the floor slab should be constructed with
a minimun space of 1 inch at either the top or bottom of thewall. The bottom of the wall would be the preferred location forthis space. This space witl a1low for any future potential
expansion of the subgrade soils and will prevent danage to thewall and/or roof section above which could be caused by this
movement.
Adequate drainage nust be provided in the foundation area both
during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water.
The ground surface around the building should be graded so that
surface water will be carried quickly away from the structure.
The ninirnun gradlent within 10 feet of the building will depend
upon surface landscaping. Bare or paved areas shoul-d naintain a
minimurn gradient of 2*, while landscaped areas should maintain a
mininum gradient of 5$. Roof drains nust be carried across allbackfilled areas and discharged well away fron the structure.
A subsurface peripheral drain, including an adequate gravelcollector, sand filter and perforated drain pipe, should be
constructed around the outside of the building at foundation
level . Dry wells should not be used anywhere on this site. The
discharge pipe should be given a free gravity outlet to the
ground surface. If "daylighto is not available, a sealed sump
and punp should be used.
Should there be any retaining walls constructed on this site,
they should be equipped with an adequate drain system to insurepositive drainage of the retained soil. this drain system typi-
cal1y would consist of a properly filtered gravel- collector and
discharge pipe, with the pipe having a free drainage outlet todaylight. An alternative to this type of systen would be to use
an adequately filtered gravel collector behind the wall with
"weep holes" through the wall to provide an outlet for moisture.
However, care should be taken with this type of installation suchthat noisture from "weep holesn does not saturate the soil imme-diately in front of the wall. It should be pointed out that the
equivalent fluid pressure values given previously assume that thesoil behind the waII is in a drained condition.
Vail Village
June 5, 1980
Page -5-
To glve the buildlng extra lateral stability and to aid in therapidlty of runoff, aII backfill around the building and in uti-lity trenches in the vicinity of the structure should be con-pacted to at least 90t of its naximum Proctor dry density, ASTMD-698. The native naterials encountered on this site may be usedfor backfilling purposes, if so desired. All backfill nust be
compactecl to the required density by mechanical means. No waterflooding techniques of any type should be used in the placementof fill on this site.
At the time of the inspection, the stability of the slope on thesite appeared to be adequate. Owing to the steepness of theslope, however, we must recornmend that no cuts or fills should be
made on the site in excess of 5 feet without specific examinationof each proposed cut or fill base. The natural slope should be
disturbed as little as possible.
Sone of the finer grained soils encountered across the site were
found to contain sulfates in detrimental quantitiesi therefore, a
Type II Cement is recomnended for use in all concrete which will
be in contact with all clayey foundation soils. Under no cir-
cumstances should calciurn chloride ever be added to a Type II
Cement. In the event that a Type II Cement is dlfficult toobtain, a Type I Cement may be substit.uted, but only if it isprotected fron the soil by an impermeable menbrane.
As mentioned previously, any topsoil or debris should be rernoved
from the construction area prior to beginning construction of thefoundation. In addition, should any pockets of debris, organicnaterial or areas of unusually low density soil be encounteredduring excavation for the footing, this material should be renoved
and replaced with backfill cornpacted to 95t of the naxinumProctor density, ASTM D-698.
Owing to the relative steepness of this site (sJ"opes up to
approximately 57 percent) r and the subsurface materials
encountered, it will be inherently susceptible to novement, bothvertically and latera1ly. Lateral movement is felt to consistprimarily of a gradual downslope creep as discussed previously.
Rapid rnass tnovements are not likely if proper drainage of thesite is achieved, and cuts and fills restricted. The possibilityof rapid mass movement must be recognLzed, however remote it naybe. fhe recommendations provided here are intended to decreasethe potential for movement, both vertically and laterally. The
founclation design reconmendations given in this report are speci-fically ained at minimizing the effects which soil novement would
have on the building.
Should the project characteristics differ fron those assumed inthis report, Lincoln-Devore would appreciate the opportunity to
review the nature of construction such that changes in the recom-
nendations may be made if necessary.
1Vail Vlllage
June 5, 1980
Page -6-
The open foundation excavation must be inspected prior to tbeplacing of forms and pouring of concrete to establish that ade-quate design bearing materials have been reacbed and that nodebris, soft spots or areas of unusually low density are locatedwithin the foundation region. AlL fill placed below the foun-dations nust be fully controlled and tested to ensure that ade-quate densification has occurred.
It is believed that all pertinent points concerning the subsur-face soils on this site have been covered in this report. Ifquestions arise or further information is reguired, please feelfree to contact Lincoln-Devore at any time.
Respectf ul-Ly subnitted,
TINCOLN}VORE TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
{""4By: Francis MagifussenCivil Engineer
FMrzlab
LDTL Job No. GS-1389, 34031cc3 LDTL - Glenwood Springs
Re signann, P. E.
TEsr n-oue no.
TOP ELEVATION
i^. L..
C.L-A,YEY.,
It., eLAYF-f,.
g.FT TO T,Ln{r:
ta.Uc
@
SOFT TO T.B.
Ylc = ,6."lo
Plo\gT.,
BCAYIERIbc'6gEL6s)
bARKgRA\^/x.,
HO\ST TO
VERY Ftor3T.j
@SE.8Rlr.j
9R.,
C,LAY6Y.,
w/qu.eurcogB[ES,r'
neNUl^.bet(€ tr.()
T. B.SK.,
CLAYI'Y.,
tg.
ta.9.t6At/o
to @ w/sc^'tlrg
Sb"6*.,e lo
V€RY
d, oec-.'gdrLb€'Rs'.,
l.16ru}(be s\T(.,
llor€T To
LY. BRO\./(
l5 VER'Y m6l5-l5
LT. ERqr4l
zo ?o
25 ?5
coLonADO: COLOnADO SPRlr|OS ;
PUEELO , GLE WOOo SPRIl{0S 'oRAlt o JutloTlot{, Iol{TROSE 'ltYoillt{6: ROcK SPRlt{09
LINCOLN
D€VORE
Eil G l|{€ 8R3.
GEOLOGIS:TS
Prr l_ocs
i
SUMA4ARY SHIET
Soil Sornple IrL Test
Date
No. 34o3r
Lpcotion Vrtu Vr LLAo,c 5-22-&
Boring f.lo Deprh , ' 4-'1P1a.ru)
Sorple No. I Test by
Noturol Woter Confeni (w) lsg o/.
Specific Grovity (Gs)In Place Density (fo) pcf
SIEVE ANALYSIS:
Sieve Nb.o/o Possing
I t/2!
t1
3/4::12:
loo.o
t0 96.9
20 a9.e
10 a4.l
100 7/.5
200 6t.l
}TYDROMETER ANALYSIS:
Groin size (mm)o/o
ozo a1.r
oo5 tg5
Plosfic Limit P.L^ a"" *
Liquid Limit l. l- 'z.t o/o
Plosticify Index P.l. la3 %
Shrinkoge Umit
Flow lndex
Shrinkoge Rotio
Vo I umetri c Chonge----96
Lineof Shrinkoge o/o
MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD
Optimum Abisfure Content - w*o
lvloximum Dry Density -rd-rocf
Colifornio Beoring Rofio (ov)-J6
Swef l' z DoVs-*--Yo
Swell ogoinst4,-psf Wo goin a'6 9o
BE,ARING:
l-louse I Penetrometer
Unconfined Compress
(ov)---!-aoo.----+sf
ion (qu)-psf
Plofe Beoring:pf
lnches Settlement
Consolidofion
PERMEABILITY:
Vo under paf
K (ot
Void
2Pc)
Rotio
Sulfotes 2ooot PPM.
SOIL ANALYSIS Ll NCO LN-DeVOR E TESTI NG LABORATORY
COLORADO SPR! NGS, COLORADO
I
8oL1 SamPIe gl{Test
Date
TeEt
No.g-
ProJectJ!:l5 VrLlra.r; b 6-2?-60
Saqrle Iccatlon t.p. t t @ g'(.s.rercg)by I. b.
EoH
E
)'rm
&
FIzHh
E:{2
frlU&9lA
100
90
80
70
5
5
3
2
I
t\.5,"V+J
,o
tl
.r_ (#"l
#200 -a #20 #{o #t@ Sleve No.
Nonplastlc to Plastic
sample No.z
Speclftc cravlty
Uolatute Content 293
Effectlve slze o.oo7s
?66.67
Cc
Plneneaa l,todulus
L.L. za.z % P.I.
BE,ARINC ZOOO
_:.?__3
psf
S\./€u- ^ 3oo PS+
o.zo
Sl"erre Slze % Pasalng
1
lx
L/2"
7t.9
3/4:-n.t
L/2!71.9
3/a"5s.1
4 65.5
10
20
40
52.6
A6.e
r00 t9.a
0200
oo5
t9.?
8.4
Sulfetes etu+
GR.AIN SIZE ANALYSIS LINCOLN-DEVORE TESIING IABORATORY
coLoR,ADO SPRTNGS, COLOR.ADO
t
coLoRA00r co|-oRADO SPRIt{GS,
PUEELO, GLEllwooo sPRlt{G3 ,
GRAilD JUilGTIOil , I{OIITROSE ,
wYo u | ]'t G ! ROOK SPR lllGS
LINCOLN
DEVORE
ENGIilEERS.
GEOLOGISTS
Gtrrq,\u S,te Loc.^-,ou b,o"qAr',.
F.n rer ftoes
N
COLORADO: OOLORAOO SPR IIIGS r
PUEBLO, 6LE llwooo sPRll{G3 ,
GRtflD JUrGTlotl , tollTi0sE 'wYo lN6 : ROOK SPRlttlcs
LINCOLN
DEVO R E
ENCIIIEERS.
GEOLO G ISTS
TE*' Prr Lo*t,o^, b'oc.^ot
TP.tra
T.P.t a
9--
DESCRIPTIONS'
CONGLOMERATE
SANDSTONE
SILTSTONE
SHALE
CLAYSTONE
COAL
LIMESTONE
DOLOMITE
MARLSTONE
GYPSUM
Of her Sedimenfory Rocks
GRANITIC ROCKS
DIORITIC ROCKS
GABBRO
RHYOLITE
ANDESITE
BASALT
TUFF A ASH FLOWS
BRECCIA I Olher Volconics
Olher lgneous Rocks
GNEISS
SCHIST
PHYLLITE
SLATE
METAOUARTZITE
MARBLE
HORNFELS
SERPENTINE
Other Meiomorphic Rocks
OLS 8 NOTES'
9/2 Stondord pen€lrofion drive
Numbers indicole 9 blows to drive
the spoon 12'into ground.
ST e- l,/2" Shelby thin woll somple
Ule Noturol Moisture Conlenl
llJl Weothered Moteriol
Free woter toble
70 Noturol dry densily
T.B. - Disturbed Bulk Sompla
@ Soiltype reloted 10 somplss
in report
Top of formolion
gTesf Boring Locotion
EE Test Pit Locotion
t_zt-r Seismic or Resislivity Stolion.
Lineolion indicotes opprox.
lendh a orientotion of spreod
( S = Seismic , R= Resislivify )
Slondord Penelrotion Drives ore mod6
by driving o stondord l.n" splil spoon
sompler inlo the ground by dropping o
t4o lb.wsight 3o". ASTM lesi
des. D- 1s86.
Somples moy be bulk , siondord split
spoon ( bolh disturbed ) o, ,'r12" l.D.
ihin woll ('rundislurbed rr) Shelby lube
somples. See log for type.
The boring logs show subsurfoce conditions
ot the doles ond locolions shown ,ond it is
nol worronl€d thol lhey ore represenlolive
of subsurfoce condilions ol olher locolions
ond times.
SOILS
{;7
DESCRIPTIONS'
@e9 oEscRrPflo
-
Topsoil
-
Mon-mode Fill
GW Well-groded Grovel
GP Poorly-groded Grovel
GM Silty Grovel
GC Cloyey Grovel
SW WelFgroded Sond
SP Poorly-groded Sond
SM Silty Sond
SC Cloyey Sond
ML Low-plosticity Silf
CL Low-plosticily Cloy
OL Lorrrr-plosticity Orgonic
Sill ond Cloy
MH Higtrplosticity Silf
CH High-plosficity Cloy
OH High- plosticiiy
Orgonic Cloy
Pt Peot
GW,zGM Well- groded Grovel,
S illY
GVGC Well-groded Grovel,
Cloyey
GP/GM Poorly- groded Grovel,
SiltY'
GPIGC Poorly*groded Grovel,
Cloyey
GM/GC Silty Grovel,
C loyey
GC,UGM Cloyey Grovel,
SiltY
SfuV/SM Welt - groded Sond,
SillY
SW/SC Well-groded Sond,
C lo yey
SP/SM Poorly-groded Sond,
SiltY
SrySC Poorly- groded Sond,
Cloyey
SM/SC Siliy Sond, Cloyey
SC,zSM Cloyey Sond, Silty
CLIML Silty Cloy
xxx
xxx
Grond Junction.- WYO.- Rock
EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS
AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS
ICi I t{J{T I /,t-'l r'.l Lil
tu1{ oF 1rj1 s..::rn
t soiLR lif ttE c!-qqi.llsl
:r-_ccK
f l {i5l uJ-*-_- ru:t Lrt-cx f)-_ _t_C'\
'slnifT /O]!tsswt_ 7 -
EttLt16 ,o:|iEss
l.
2,
q.
5.
6.
7.
8.
g.
J0. -i'
?-
3.
tt.
t
FASEletff
Jsr noon
lro rlo:r
']D
FLMR
PASE3J'
Jsr rlmr'lro rlo:r
)iD FLo;R
PASS-'tr\.*T
Isr rLcs?
?o ncoa
)RD FL@?
a srtt 8 ToILET-(s:E rx-r grmJ
DCIPA SIIiKS
' Ftrl SilH(s-c.',= oR TLB.
?Jlsn{, Ioll.iT'
Sf"OtoS)
KITC€iS
DlSv;{r$3S
[J$ORtES
be.a risrsJ
lcl t'ArdlliEs
StrLt\tAS
xrrg cecLr=s t
t:AtE FCU{iAlis
Srlili'ltllc F\DLS
J^CUZ,I
CU'SID:.}IqTER.O.lltt,.llt oF c€)
. -t_-RIL EATIS -_ j
8C0s
KIIO9I
DIS.t1;'sI€R
i-r.uvaarrs
CN,'TSIDE HATFX
1.9)
,E
J.6
2.50
1.m
.50
,6
.E
.1)
5.m
l:E
3..p'. =
l.m =
Ilil
=x' .50'=
x l.fr| =
Rccrs (it'll trs Pcrr-s,
x =-. ]/. o 9
x l.tr = /2'o r)
5.oo
Ox
/2-
2_
)
2-
-t-
2-
/7
o-
7
3i
x
x
x
= -2. Po-
;'-J-:-.Q-a
x
5?
.<-o
x
x
x
WLi'ffit2-z''?o
rcxlc,{tr:G 'lls cc}?Le[tcrt c: cc:sTnlsTll:..gi.t't^t-tr:rrrrs' n'= DtsliitcT sll\ll
t" trciJl A ftl/Slc-/r tl,;,'rci'rci-ci'r.,j ir'-'rls:s ;o cl'i:;ltlil Il: lru!:r[s cF Foll:Ts
'to l\c r6!ts::D ^ct.-rul;:'i
iol'i r*rir i":D SZi'ei i'? r:'' '"';D lv\IE 3:ri-J!'r'-E' ;s
;.r[r:r\l'r i.'i'J ll:: ols;;llcr'ir';r: i i:tti 't'I .''nJ-ujI';ilis t:if t55;'?Y lri Tl€ c'jtl6l;l''l-
r/J' t 1.t- f,\lD. n,rr t;':oiotolsir"j-r- t'La) o:-lt;illl;C nt: DUIL'tlfi o"lti's l liR
iiru sctin ',LRvtce cJr liLE'
T TAI-' 10.m
,TOT'L
POlt{TS
IlisPL OR
TI
.LIsr or uarnnrnls O
NAME OF PROJECT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DEscnrprroN oF pRoJEcr Ffr/rl0Ry *SECoxlDRRy DU EX
e t zQr<>RF:5 t
LOT BLocK I
. ,/- -2N-)L,t_-
G FILING
Theto
a.)
following information
the Design Review Board
BUILDING MATEBIALS:
Roof
Sj-ding
Other Sall Materials
Iascia
Soffits
trlndows
Window Tri-m
Doors
Door Trim
Eand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Encl-osures
Greenhouses
Other
-t-,
,i- , f-;-\ ;)r r-\i 1z',2-r i\ ,'" /--/.,-V.= t-\-, ) 11 c r-r! -/\ -.,e, \-., e' .--<-lu RS €S
i3or.rerl r-E
?EL4. I3RourN IRO^., CLf)
tx Nj(2v/+ Sco'(A REalJoc?-D
B. ) PI"A,NT MATERIALS(Vegetative, Landscaping MaEerials. and Ground Cover)
?otanical Name Coumron llame
I?SPC N !L) '
Quantity
-.-4-
a
i-\ .--
i!_-/ !
is required for submittal by the Applicant
before a final approval can be given.
Tvpe of Material Color
(1,eoaR- :-'h1AP€S
including Trees, Shrubs,
Size
oGH Strr.r
EO QCY)I>
FKD )', ED til /:-tD/^.-i6
t'rFf
Page 2
Plant Materials Concinued
Botanical Nane SizeCormon Name Quantitv
c.)OTITER I.ANDSCAPE FEATI]RES
in i"i"irg Wal1s , Fences , Swirming Pools, etc ' )
(Please Specify)
la lu 'rz Dr+ luooxs:TowrF
LLS o r,J N
4 F
D nt Zorto, Zonzr, Appr.nneur'r
BARRISTERS & SOLICITOR S
ELVIO L. OEL ZOTTO FRED J.T, ZORZI
MARTIN l. APFLEBAUM DANTE M.D.MONTE,O.C.
SAUL I.GLOBER HOWARO SAGINUR
PATRICX A. DUCO RICXLAND A. R.CARLETON
MARVIN S. N,GEIST GERALD B,YASSKIN
1225 ST. CLAIR AVENUE WEST
TORONTO, CANAOA
M6E IBO
Attention: Miss Diana Toughill
,Building and Zoning DePt.
Dear Sirs:
Re: teo Delzotto purchase through Vail
Associates, Inc., Lot 9, Block l,
vail village 6th Filing, vail,
Colorado.
we are solicitors representing the purchaser of the
above noted vacant property which is outlined in red on the xerox
sketch attached hereto.
Our clientrs purchase is conditional upon certain
matters and we would be most giateful if you would kindly advise us
at your early convenience:
(a) Would a building permit be available upon submission of the
appropriate plan and lplcifications for the Lonstruct1on of a 2-unit
Uirilai"g coniaining ab6ut 5000 square feet on the subject property;
(b) would a building permit be available upon payment of the normal
uuitaing permit fee only or are any levies required to be paid by the
Town before the permit can be issued;
(c) Are services, includinq water, hydro and sewers available to the
lot line of the property, and finally
(d) Provide us with details of any restrictive covenants of the Town
of Vail affecLing these lands.
I
T
Town of Vail,^2^March 4, 1976.
As this transaction is slated for conpletion on the
27th March, L9761 four early reply would be esteened a favour-
Yours very trulyt
DEL ZOTTOT ZORZT| APPT,EBAUM
Per:
WS,/9en
encl .
MItilliam Scott
-FEB.6.26@t
FEf -O€-ol 18 t 2'l
t.
I, 4345PN.. -.BECK FND NSSOCOCINTESttun. rev-l,-"o- --- -rDt9?O4742'ra3
. l,E:uBr-rJFEn @ lAt
q,-*h5ff[flmgl:
cir vnu Oeninaftcr cd
WH€REAS, fie oe'/tloper' T a T$q91 ot approval ! Y''#** aiffiWic ilii-rnt" a oorcnpa rmpro/ement
Agreernrnc utcl
W{EREAS,ncDa/c|op.fbob|igtsted.to.provtdeseqrntyo?@||atera|sr.rfticienrinthc
Iudgrnent ot fic Town m'mlG'ro.onOre ptsU.S,i" fot ctl'npfUon of cenain improvemenfii
sdtor[t bclo/: ano .
W{EREAS' Ure Dancbper wishcs b pft'tde colldcrel P gy'aFllee pcilorrnance of
htE rgreement rn luo"lfi"#fi"jfr th"ib#ffiiln:"c iri'protomotfu bv means ol the
folhsrftig:
fiffi,*ff-*;'"*'H*tr-Tfi:effi:fl'il;lliffoY*"
*++8artO.
\vAL\OA?A\EvERlOllaFoR[lsDlAcAs]tDoc
I of4
IMEBAVIUENI
? ,Ahd*d lAleq,\Wil
fitl0;ur
o a zllrol
,D.aw
c sHODEPosrfonil r
*ttt4-wL
--FEB. 6.?AAT 4:46PM-- -,EECK RND RSSOCOCIATESFil'gt-C I lE I 2€l IFODI 3 rsv-t'-t.|laO 24e2tt D r t"€{?9 N0,63? "P.3
NOW, THEREFORE hT cortsidcraion of thp foltowing rnsnJal covcriants and
agrrem;G: t e Ocvctoper atrtt $e Town agro€ ts tollou'c:
The Developer eorc.e' il dle solc co$ d ?!!P'1'-b-lT-:l*tt' cquipment
"''d;;;;'r;A;6Joomd'tc{TpY*15::i:*9iliil:'ffifi ;':Eii;,ill'd'i"ig"oc.yg-"1'11LEi1"19
rnDrovo'|tEnE rs rsrEs rnevEr ..r,.r'!r* 'w "*y;;;iVA,
eric o do allworthcijentalli6e-Coitn""iV DevghPrncnt 0'Frfipnt'*ftt
tffib-;;fu,U to and in comp|irnce with t1c followit€:
a Suctl ou|cr deshns, dtawin$' nuPs' spcificatons' gpqi* atd ofts matter
$rbmittsd bv tre Dardop.r to DG aPi'6"-td bt'ttv.?il:.ltov'{efe?enc'd
gorrerr,n cn-tlt-ir1i6: {r1saU onrii-nan m ioni under.6e im'€cdon of, and
to ue srrrsrifsfrrni;ihdie'"t endmecr' rtc rovrp.a-u!l!t19 otficial' or otpr
offidal trcm tre Tomm or Vail' as arfiffi'iiipicill qiEtlic6 or seMoe dlsfrlil'
as thcir respellve inhrcst mav ts;il;a iirll n0199 g9emeU compbte utttil
.pp?ov.d lff;;d;d; co-!ilCtco W frc-rornrr Vril communfi
De,reloprnent oepanmsnt ar|(l Pubb l{od(l D3patEnent
2.Tos.cureudguararneepgn-b'rilanceo|its.obtfafiong||sscrlonhlrefcin'thc
D€wlopor agreles to prwioeeiolttV and coldcral s bllowc:
A eash dcposir accounr In ihe amoum d !4Pe-._.10. bE hctct by the Town,
|' orr-Jil&,t]6ii iiiiol r;il*il. _4ru-ine'oremenF set tod) above
n r,crc ir aiaaiitiunob he Agccrtrettt w Da/3topgr'
3. The Dgvgloger rnry at.ary sme eubefirte the oltatenal orlelnallv set fonh above
for anofis form ot co[;;fi-aEfJbteio m" rrtr b guaf.ntee the tall
tE . improvcrnen6 re#;;-;;tin anO ttc
.0.
*-,io ot fie b6l3 of $1e Agtcorncnt'
Sr.rcfi accrptance by Ut" Tffi-J-i6mrm" coi;d;bltibe tt tho Town's rote dsctrtion'
4- Thc Totrvn shall no[ nor chall any offtrr or efltplolf f1:ot' bc-sable -oJ - '-
,aspo.tsibrc ter any ac#;ililg9-6? dffiaec nAei.xffi 91ocar-'1ngro-1re
wofk spccilicd in
trb Agr.er€nt pdor b frI'#iFf"t"" "tC-1gf'P[.."e-"t
lhl samc' nor Crall the Tgtln' nor
any otfic.r o, cmpovce-o-ereoi. oe nore ror arry'frat s ii ptopenv !iI..t by rsason of fie
natun of saH work but lit?A;-ti"bild* $afr ;ld-al. heibv rium* uv ne Dadoper'
Th3 Dsrclopsr hcreby eEru+ to indomnify
"qd.hold Pgl-TIt !r9 Town' erd any of 'lts
officars, agerrb atd efiDloyact againgt etty hssA-d'itls' danEges' or fitbirtdcs to whidl me
tlErrgrrcn5FRr/!|wc^ltl.F0
2d4
-'--FEB. 6.?g@t- 4.46Pn.- _.BECK AND AS$COCIRTES!EE-e6;9r l3'23 ?lolr'r'Pv-e"'U' --' -'rr)'a?o17Ee4E2 NO.537 "P,4
Town or anv of il3 officers, qg?S. oI TqEjYt *y b'come s{d lo..
insolar as anv $'dr
|osse0, ctairrE, oa'ag6 ;rTabi|iua (or bgdorr.in-lispegr rncraoti tlet eds3 out 0t o' are
barcrr upon any pcrror;#eTir{ b"rcrry ffiffi;.d ttr'c ggyetoeershar rctrnbunse
the Town ioranv arr d legrl or 9fg,e1qeg iliiinalU iltufed bv treToun in
liliiion-*v,r,*oq'$frU,Y.#r",T*inn:,#ml,rum,t'""U:m
This lndsmnlty Provbio
heve.
srrarraritiorucf .;iffi Hflg,g#'*i!i'i#f :1ffi{ffifrl!Ti'I"Hl'*,H'E-1fr...'
improvrment at rucn fre-diuar imprcvernr#it6 *itt "tta
in como$ance vuilfr all Plarrs
and spectficattons r., ,eri6rcd r*jrc.r -i.ilifi]6i-dc ro*n. under no condrtion
wi' fie amounr or u,r iiiaifr-nat g ocir,s h.-H-il-;61;;i bclow ffre ilmount mccssaty to
gomPlet3 suct hProvements'
6- lf the Tovun deteminss' at hr :9b dboretur' q+ ?tty-olol irnprpvcments
oonDrnetarcd rrr*d; ;ff ffii^,cr.a, iitliiiijiii ys *i eF. and specitrca$ons
sor torth in ura nerceilriJnii orrot" tn.ooofiiilttt it i"aerah 2' thc Tovun mav' but
shal not be r*utrtl "' &ffi fiA! 91frt ;nlrscetv io comole*c frle untinlshed
imprcverrenE. me dihliial rctease sudr tdiai upon ",rqgi
trc,rcai from ilre Tovrn statng
thar urc me*,.rn",trii'l ;t b;[;ttet"#;-ffi ;;Jt tS tst"E|n'nt rhe Bank
srrafl not ruc,rirc nc fi;lilrrcc & ne dad&;ffiJ nc6se ot nt tun(ts F the Toill nor
$!ilt fic Bank br "fi# il;ttitdtp*d;ffi fr; ntd,| imFo-v'ments hara not becn
oomprdrdarr.qurj'Lidr'ili#i,.uiiuut"drln fiJiliurl' ruttorsorev upon theTswn-s
\ufttpn rcquc€t'
|fthecostsofcomp|cthguilcm'kexceodthcemoumotfisdeDos'Lhee,Ga$'
:ffi#$ff#ilt#ffgffim'i*H,l5tffffisuffirs
a"",
coll*tctt in uc sane"mfr"ias ottneugg valorcm taxc levied '
hc oonnn holdcttars o'q"F3-"Yggt;Ailp 8td rirrcsc4ilno" ac defined tn thls
araprr. s,rcrr faifu;i renlsar shall DB consiiJ-;ti"iarion of thc Zon'rrp code'
7. Thc Do/eloper wanantr al ytt td mddial-for-a'91loO of one year afcr
aocaprencc or al wi'r?-&6i to; ura mrJ&ilitili-rti-rJ*n ii^'tu€hwod('ut localgd on
Toun ot Va[ propcnv or rvttrin Torn ot v.ir rfrii6i-i'i'v runuenr n Sec{on 17'r 6'250'
t- Thc pudce hordo muilalvrgrcc tlattlE Agt?T:llmav be amended ftom
tnre ro timc, p.ovHef,ffi;dL- attdnOmk'#ii itt- wnitit g inO rrsnec by all panies herptr'
FflrEFYOttEKtRf -\DlAclsll'oos
3 of4
srArE*offi*d6'*l\
;;*6^df*ir'r'"if
, Theforsgolgl
-?t-daV d+
Wltness nry hend afld offblal scal-muBERlf AlDf glElrElrlg
Prblo.ilobrySod
My commbslon oxplns
Wtnecs nry hrnd and officJal scal'
trly commbcion o$rrs:
STATEOFCOLORADO )
) ss.
couNwoFEAGLE )
Trre forosue Dorc|oPor |'flptwoment Agre.Frentw?s ackngw|cdgad bcfotl m€ tt|is
'- { ,t---.=;77;""'"'n 'w il ''<'^:')'^'"< '
No.63z t'P.s'212432olDr9?Oe6.M'._ 4.4?PI1 ^-BECK Ft{D ffiSOCOCIRTES
r G r 29 FROI!! I Tgv-cutraniv-e"' - 't,
' Datsd tro day ald yeat ftts! sbow wdtton'
-FEB.fl'-:"'"'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tlE\,EFrcNeFrtil]trDlac glr.o9c
{ of4
75 S. Frontags Road
Vail, CO 81557
4.U ?' o.t 4L-b-rE/-
4lease make checks payable to the TOWN OF VAIL
"ja
Account No.Item No.tCode#iCostEach
001 0000 314 121 1 Blue Prints/Mylar Copy Fees
obtbooo'st+ttti iierox Copies- - -
ooi ooob sia t t t t' tionsn&o rvrasrer ptan tSr -eo/$1.60f
0000 314 1111 lstudies, Master Plans, etc.
0000 315 3000 tPenalty Fees/Re-lnspections
001 0000 311 2300 .Plan Review Re-ched( Fee
I 0000 315 2000 lOff Hours Insoection Fees
001 0000 312 3000
001 0000 312 4000
001 0000 312 4000 Additional Fee
rt^,,;at, e,- -.1 Fae /pra-naid)
001 0000
0000 AD
RL
S,q
1 0000
001 0000
0001 To*n of
ili"[f*Jl"*
Vai i
filLLll'{ {i{
RECEIFT: BB8t4i,r
'0o1 0001
001 000(
[-rsI0f,r]i- L0C8Ii0[ Att0uflf
ffff fli3:cs;ll;i,'.," lfli'u
Tt, i1'1*AD tf,
ETLJ000(
0001 PV $200.00
000r TtllDtR DflfiILLii ,1(.1
ii+[i ,fi{Ei,ui
..|I!OUIIi TE}IDIREO
rHAf{Ii YOU FOR
000 r4s8e.50
TIIIE: 9:07:3i
f488t.58
i4888. 50
Y0uR t'0rnENil
000
1 00c
001 00c
100(
00(
MS
PN
OH
CL
SF
SP
caecx* R7/n3 Received
12120t2000
FRofl o
r_HE.gARDEN CENTER OF EAGLE-VA|L
THE-GARDEN CENTER OF GYPSUM
di"isi,cnsA Moffhews fr Associoles LondScOping, InC.
Londscope Architesture ond Construction
Box 3567 . Voll, Colorodo 81650 U.5.4. . (970) 9a9.5O77 . (970) 9a9-5079 FAX
Gypsum Office r (97O) 521-0733 . (97O) 52!-5503 FAX
6 , A2Atl
ILTG RESIDENCE
Vail, Colorado
LANDSCAPE IVIATERIAL TAKE.OFF
Item
TREES
,Sprucc
Aspcn
SEED
Gruss Sced
IRRIGATION
lrrigadon
.
MISC.
Stakc",t/straps
.Soi| Pcp
Qtv Total
s859.38
5S97.32
$227.6E
$ r,799. 1 1
$36.o7
$E6.4i
S3.906.(x)
xri
t2 foot I
2.0 inch 6
1
,,
l0
cuh
na3.{
-=l
4tocL6
ELf;a=
tniJErfi cilJ|Ho;
'f,Bn-5OEcllc]EoaruH
o(E-). I
rn
rll
EL
ru
o
c]a
zg
u,
vl
ot€€?3dT>*<*ir
N9rb
oal
?i€72a59i3E-r
AO2)i rA *-
IIJ EI tll*8.?oo
a4E
'{\a
aSS
\
z
tt
F
tr
z
t\
ir
e\a.)
F
E
V
oz
Yolllr()
o
=vi>UzL5<HgF=9E?;EC)<xl.,r-
EzsEq
;3P<8
=E!ro
Yo
UJ
!0
'(V)
(o
F(\l
z
q,
-siP
=5-s8E
8=-F
$>*
o,JJ
u,l
B
Ou)()
,qNUco
U, str--l
+J
7
U
U
(t)
ft(ot\(\
G
0)
M
j
auLr)Fr r.A(UNv
Zdco>m<r,
3
F1rl
E
F]t\)
OH
Fl
Fl
LN
(\
O
I
t-1
t.rl
c{
O
t\
ltk
c)Fi>t
rl
at lJi> --\
d;
o
r-+Al al
O}.',o>
o
'Floa
n|I
FozU'D.o
e
E
o
o
|n
F-z
{o
FFI
11(/lzo
OA
o
r;
E
I
0
cq('
F
N
a)F
6
GiEF
fi
6
()
A
ts
A
H
lnro&l|e. A
'{a F
HgOErr..{ tr
'ag{ lrr.l o lrlODt)
98
N-
al.
AHza
!.oH'E4
a
F
La
FI FIa2ED
F9@.1
tl4
rrFOE40i9H.GloIEo
FFHZc|D
88E.
HH
r)(
EFa
I
lr
2
HtHTET<,,
z9 AEl-Io c'EF. CAI 59E A-
r
E.
F
E
HI
E
AzD
g
FIt{
HEo
aaI
:n
OD
ddI}
&trqda o4Ca(, cHO tEE OAAIT
{'/tv I
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPI4ENTTOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 8a657
970-479-2]-38
Building----->
Plan check- - - >
Investigation>
Ln+"i Uiit L/ i L -k
ON .]OBSITE AT ALL TTMES
Permit. #: 89B-0343
NOTE: THIS PERMTT MUST BE POSTED
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Job Address:
Location. . .:
Parcel- No. . :Project No.:
705 FOREST RD
706 FOREST RD
2L01-O72-tL-022
PRJ98-0277
StaLus. .
Applied.
Issued..
E>cpires .
ISSIIED
1"1/ 03 /t99tar/20 /1998
0s/1,9/].999
APPLICANT GREAT DIVIDE CONSTRUCTION PhONC: 97O4752072
P O BOX 1,292, GYPSIIM, CO 81637
COMTRACTOR GREAT DIVIDE CONSTRUCTION PhONE: 9'704762072
P O BOX L292, GYPSIJM, CO 81637
OUINER HERMAN MICILAEI. E & T,AREN M
6201 WARD PK TY, KANSAS CITY MO 641-13 TCV/Comm. Dev.
DescripLion:
REDO FAII.ING RETAINING
Occupancy: R3
T)pe ConsEruction: V N
Valuation: 50,000
Fileplace Informat.ion: ResElicted:
WAL,I-, (SAME
Single
T)rpe V
Add sq
Clean- un Deqqsit RefundAS NEXT DOOR) ' - l-17i",( ! r\rrLrrrrr
apprn\1ed f{.uu.-.n- L.l_
FamiIy. Residenger it U ntNon-RaLed
dat{:}
Ft,:?lr<l0r
*Of Gaa Logs r *of wood/Pal1ec:*of cas Appliances:
FEE SUMMARY
490 - 00 RestuaranE Plan Revi.ev-->
31S.5 0 DRB Fee--------
-o0 ToEal calculaEed Fees---> 1,111.50
50.00 Additsional Fees---------> .Oo
-00 Recreation Fee----------> .oo Total Permit Fee-------_> 1,111.50
3.00 cl6an-UpDepoaits-------->250.00 Pa).menEe-------
TOTAL FEES----- 1,111.50 BAI,ANCE DUE_-'. .OO
II,CM: O5].OO BUILDING DEPARTMENT DEPT: BUILDING DiViSiON:11./03,/1998 .fRM ACLiON: NOTE PLANS TO CHARLIE1,I./20./1-998 .]RM ACTiON: APPR APPROVED PER .fRMIIbM:.O54OO PI-,ANNING DEPARTMENT DEPI: PI,ANNTNG DiViSiON:1.I/03/1998 JRM ACTiON: NOTE PI-'AN TO PI,ANNER
1-O'/ 04 /L998 BWILSON Action: APPRIE.qm;'.05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FTRE Division:1-l/03/L998 ,JRM Action: APPR N,/AITbM:'O55OO PI]BLIC WORKS DCPE: PUB WORK DiViSiON:LI/03/L998 ''fRM ACTiON: NOTE PI.,ANS TO TERRILA/Tg/L998 TPARTCH AcLion: APPR APPR
; ;; ; ;; ; ;;:;;; ;;;;;;;;;; ;; ; ;;;
DECLARATIONS
f hereby acknowledge chae I have read this application, filled ouE in full the informaEion required, compleEed an accurale plo!
p1an, and 6tate that all Ehe i.nformation provided as required is correc!. I agree to cr. -r, itl. the information and plot plan,
Lo comply rith all Town ordinanees and scaEe lawe, anil to build lhis stlucture according to the Town'B zoning and eubdivi.eion
!glnd Clean-Up D€posit. To: CinEAT DMDE
Page 2
*****************************************ikL************Jr************************
CONDITTONS
Permit. #: 898-0343 as of L2/L4/9e Status---: ISSUED*****************************************************************************'***
v
SICNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AI{D OWNER
Permit Tl4ge: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT
Applicant-- : GREAT DMDE CONSTRUCT;Cii
97 047 62072
Job Address: 706 FoREST RDLocation---3 705 FOREST RD
Parcel No-- : 2LOL-072-11-022
Description:
REDO FAILING RETAINING WALL (SAME AS NEXT DOOR)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COnditiOng Jr * * * * lr fr * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN AI-,r, BEDROOMS AtiID EVERY STORY
AS PER SEC.121-O OF THE 1991 I'BC.
Applied-- z \t / 03 /1,998rssued---: tL/20/L998
To E><pire z 05/L9/1-999
ti t tf t I tt i .}i r tt t *t i*+ t t+ a ttt tt t.r I t i t:la *tt, 'r trr r ** t * r.l1*. * * a ra rr 1
TOIIN OF VAll,, COLORADO sLrecunE
t r * rr tt t tt t * t r ralr ra r rr i rr r**t rt I t t tt t t t tttt r.r !t * r ** * r r * | r* *rr r a *rt
gErtdnnt unber: REc-o{gs lnounE 3 1,111.50 t2/14/9e
'-3rg2PayEcnl tlethod: CK lfoErEion: 12783 IniE: itRtil
Pcroit No: 898-0343 Ttp.: A-BUILD ADD/ALT SFR BUITD PE
Palc.l No: 2LOL-O72-LL-O22
Itite Addless ! 706 FOREST RD
t ocatlon: ?05 FOREST RD
Tgbal Fccs I
ttris PayE.ng t,111.50 Total ALL Put6:
Bal,rnce:
1,111.50
1r 111.50
.00
* ** lr t J rt r tt t ** t * t a *
lccoung code
BP 00100003111100
DR 00100003112200
PF 00100003112300
.ID D2.DEPO8
vfc 001000031.12600
Dcac!ipt,ion
BUIIJDING PERI'IT FEES
DEgIG!' RE\TIEI{ FBES
PLN{ CTIECK FEBS
CLENiIUP DEPOgITS
WII,'J CAIJI' INSPECUON TEE
Amounu
490.00
50.00
318 .5 0
250.00
3.00
..7:!ET=.L:.r-f-.:81: counr.v r..r"ls Cfflce O
ff , r;'tf t? " W tgH":l Xlll, :iili3fi ";l#,-l\' :io/ - ol2'r,, aZZ DATE: ---------'
,l ApptIcATIoN MUST BE FILLXD ouT coMpr.FrEl,y
ff
* * * *, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ir,t * * * :r * * * pERMr r TNF.RMA . r:; :: Wi.f-:."ffiiill i - - - -, - "
PER\IIT /J
Owners Nanre:
Arc,ritect:
General De scrj.ption:h,ft zol
Ilork Class:_ [ ]-New [ ]_Alteration
Nuruber of DweILi;g'Units: ---:-
'*l--^'"*""'
'r MEcttANrcAL: $.---
ft,******** t **** *rrE;;;; ;; ";;;;:;:i:::-2:}}**,CONTRACTOR INFOR}IATTO:
' tl-Building J3-rlunrbing tl_
Contractor:
"ffi;;W_:idress: t: rsa^a/ /.* u/,._- _o,=p\;y_7c.zrzr!aaQ9
ae alI ViEi,QTo tfi7-rl'q
?.eadress
, / - ;2" o '-"ii ij ''"ril."irr.--
,
{h
t l-Additionat ffi-Repair 1 1_(th",
Slectricat- [ j-Mechanibal tfi-otn",
TOTAL: $
loyRlglgR INFORMATIoN * * * * * *.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ik * * *
'"-----J-_
Nurnber of Acconmodation Units: -
d*:| l"u
**" o,f Fifeplaces: cas Appliances- Gas Logs- wood/pe'-1er_
q*'t**************l**********:t****** vALUATToNg ***rtJ,rt*?r ****rr**ik******** ******,r**
BUfLDfNG: $iiul6il;; i.-_- . :gSTlI:l:: i--- orHER: $- {eoaa.
Address, /J ffIl".fr"i*!l,""Jif2.J#LEl.ectrical_ contractor:A(.dress: _
-
Town of Vail Reg. No.Phone Number:.Plunbingcontraccor: N l_Addresia - Towir of VaiI Reg. No.Phone Nurnber:
l,let:hal ricaL Contractor.:.
Addrel s:
PiTiMB NG PERMIT FEE:
ME Ji{A] TCAL PERMIT T'EE:EL]CT} ICAL FEE:
OT,{ER IYPE OF FEE:f)trR trrr.. ;
Town of Vail_ Req. No.Phone l.lurnber: .
FOR OFFICE USE * * * * * :t )t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * rr * * * * ;rBU.ILDTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE:
.P],IIMBING PLAN CHECK FEE:MECHANICAL PI,AN CHFT-K FT'F,.
R-ECREATIOW FEE-:
CI,EAI.i-UP DEPOST?:
TOTAL PERMTT FEES:
BUTLDING:
STGNATURE:
ZONTNG:
SIGNATURE:
.7ob liame: lerau t{e8.2,\t t-U
Legal Description: to{ ?
'; l) nqE n qr'r
var.uartoN
!
! !I^'.li ILqzuHD rC:
3
$
d
GREAT DIVIDE CONSTRUCNON, INC.
P.O. BOX 1292
GYPSUM, CO 81637
970476-2072
,?ba.n (rE,i,r,
- --fi|e)ael l/e'anery
2aa Forrf '(/'
Ua;/ (o g/6{>
loil,'y
,,t/"il- &P,>t.
t2at wod /rA oa.
Kctscs &Tf
=oa
fotfr ailo's are 7' be
,l:/,i:'"'-: #,,$';
y'r0aa,
_\_r
" r',r.,,y.;,f
"(;i,iif;i,7*'
lq/t?*"*(
A;rl eactL's ,/'ne7'l
/,t, 7ei-t.11+./ ff ' rca.*t
: Irnh//.7ro, .rlr// L 6,fstuc/ *,( ly a.'TJ*bt rV '
fu f/ /ttld/< 't*
40c4 I tta
-lr ll. oJ.;' ,r*
- A t^t- - \. t lI
| | tl-r- r-- -l 3
,/f .re-lc. r-+.r z.! af.---
,tJi.rii lJa dr.i {
OFffieF fr#i::i.",
\(/\t
.{
s{
s fl:Jae / #e'ana4
2ad For.rf '(/'
(/a; / to g/6i>
tloi li4 s :
t P1t irtord 2rA 0y
Kc$qs ('7, //o/ l.t/t7
Faot ,Truo-lu"c/ ,"'r" o/f'o'
rt.,:e4) # 6eoEa{bice/ teViTr,
4n h, TasT resrrfr aP1 /rai'ta|e
c-/
GREAT DIVIDE CONSTRUCTION, INC,
P.O. BOX 1292
GYPSUM. CO 81637
970-476-2072
hhraon
forfr ar'alo's a/e To be
",,\ni:,"r.ij fy',,ff';
/rVa't,
4;il/ *"*('efr;iD,r
=oa
+f
;7::;;:'fu;;{;i/:
Je TaEn( TaforTl 4n
?o Ky lnifrT<
loo/,
Kh *g
Cllct
&/r4
ftt*trtf/tur,rNil.rr
ffit-afu*-
Helical Pier(f . Mudiacking. Concrete SawingFax 97 0-47 6-2072 grdivide@vail.net
NOV-02-94 95222 Pn
. lE,r-12_t398 L7i2i
AT. DIVIDE. CONST. INC
Ee*cbmnrk l{(u4 t Suia. i0{ ' P() Aox
(i:o] e{$-?7'i8 . l^x (9701 t{9 {0t'l .
GREo o47o97 6 2472 P-A2
Ax
t,- !.#F.1tIfT' l'
Nlonnre & Ne
Iq;lt*{$, Inc.
P.0i
Ityt . Avr)f . fAlnrndl] 81620
cfltil: n:ncn8rrfiir'ri'.ncr T^TH p. r-tz
\\'ell
Novcober2. 1998
Orcrr Dividc Constructioil\ bs.
DO Ilor 1292
Gypsuut, C0 t1637
Attn: Mr. Torn Webc
Rc: Ilernrrn Rccidsnc'e (706 Forcsr Road)' Vel, Colorado (M&N #4171)
Gcntlcmcn:
Monroc & Ncwcll Engiuoorl hc. hls rad$vld lha ddiSn sletdl grepared by 1ou for
rtabitization of 6e eristing lirnbcr site rvall'
The wrli <ierigrt r: rkctchcd ir occcpteblc fr tbc loading v-o *'ould urtioipato on thc woll'
!f you have nny qucstionr ot connentl, ploue call'
Vcry truly Youn,
,I,N{CINEERS, hIC.
NOV-62-9€} A3=22 Pn GREo AT. DIVIDE. COHST. INC 97 75 2A72 P. €tlU
Pax:
Revieu & conrmenE
Fevteu,cohnenL t
Per your request
F.0.80x t292
GYPSUM, CO 0t037
n0-a76.20?2
r'tf rirr*+a*rtttirrtrattt rtraatrrttrlttrrrararf tf **rtt*ttrrarr
FAX TRANSVITTAL
| | ilrl a*t lrrtlr*t+t*taaf aattartttt*tarlrltattraltltif arrr*ilrt
To:Dacer :? t/,z-2F
Company:
Phcnc:
Ncr. of paEes lncludtng this cov6r!7--
RE:'n,f ty'/,','+7.a-t
Ple,rsc cgnf i rm No respon6e requifed
For your revlen cnly
return
Comnenr s
Far q70-47G..107)Helbal Piaring . Mudjacking. 6*^1o 5"n nO grdwtle i8 vail.ttcl
8-@4:1999 I l:@6AM ,a P. 1
O048 E BE^VEN CR€C x BLvD
SutrE 207
Box 5 300
AvoN, C0 8r520
970.949.5200
vmd@voil.nct
Frx'949.5?05
VMDAJOB NO.1bL9
5
W'E ARE SENDING YOU VIA
tr DELIVEREDBY
O SHOPDRAWINCS
tr SPECIFICAilONS
THESE AI€ TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
O FORYOURAPPROVAL O REVIEWED BYVVIDA O AS REQUESTED
II REIECTTED
IJ.FOR REV'IEW AND COMMENT
x
(nnx s
*t,kofrl fnW.VWh
ATTACHED tr PICKUPORDELIVERY
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
PRINTS tr PRODUCT INFORMITIOI\I] CHANCE ORT'ER
COPY OF LETTER 6i L AtBt
o
r]
t
t.;
trI I:URNISH AS CORRECTED
COPIES
O PRINTS RETURNEDAFTER LOAN TO US
I
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ro UtVFp lour,rfitnolrntc .-- DA"IE ?'b'aa- Mttw. ArrENnoN#rdrrr
4lr-'rlrt*
x FOR YOUR USE
O REVISEANDSUBMIT
# COPIES DATE DESCRTPTION
46fi frx e@rtrf-9 ?w|-4amatz W.
REMAR,JTS
r',
COPYTO SIGNED tlhtAt d{@l
€-€44999 1l ,@6AM
aQt gJ, L't, 1{. '+.'
,o t-- z.
PAIL VLIVLuJ\r{+, rt r*t_L
Monroe & NarellEngln€erq lrc.
70 Dacfnerf Bo.C fultr 204
Avo[' Colorrdo E1620n0M*?]16[ 9 ND19-4{d!1Frx
D.ualD avonGnoaroc;Fewell . com
FACSIMII.E I?AI{SMITIAL LETTER
Due _Lfi)fr
C.@4 "=-
VNilD
Pagcs (bcluding Fm|milsl)
Afieotion
Coqaoy
Tslcphonc
Fax
From
Subjcct
Message
Telcpbone
F8
Pmicdr +jZL
If traasmital is uot ar indicacd glcasc acify secrtc
d
eroz
'o
E
o2
.o
FI.,2
40
FF
za
:
F
E
tr
oF
o
F
1UO
(,91
F
o
F.
F
FI
z7
EI:
FT
FFz?rtl 5EOFE
D
bFiAVroFE
(ao
t-. z
ooAE
AI
F'
a
F:
FI
F
zo
F
E()
Z lt7
:FTo (,FlF EA
UO
FT
F
F
o
2
o
;
;
E>
rrlo'cco
TOWI\ OF VAIL
Project Name: Illig Residence project Number: prj00_0042
Project Description: Change to landscape plan
Owner, Address, and phone: CliffIllig
11504 Pawnee Circle
Leawood, KS d62ll
9r3-491-1668
Architect/Contact, Address, and phone: Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Avon, CO 81620
project Street Address: 206 w. Forest
970-92G5299 fax: 92G2993
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block l, Vail Village 6th
Parcel Number: 210107211022 Building Name:
Design Review Action Form
Board/StaffAction
Action:staffapproved with
conditions
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:Limit of disturbance be established at rear of lot.past this point in future
No development to occur
Town Planner: Allison Ochs
Date: June 20,2000
Project Name: Iltig Residence
Documentl
Comments: Received variance on March 13
Changes to original submiffal
DRB Fee Paid: $50
o
ProjectNumber: Prj00-0042
Design Review Action Form
TOWNOFVAIL
Project Name: trlig Residence
hoject Description: Remodel and Addtion
Owner, Address, and Phone: Cliff Illig
11504 Pawnee Circle
Leawood, KS 66211
913-491-1668
Architect/Contact, Address, and Phone: Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Avon, CO E1620
970-926-5299 faxt 926-2993
Project Street Address: 706 W. Forest Rd
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block I, Vail Village 6th
Parcel Number: 210107211022 Building Name:
Comments: Received variance on March 13
Changes to original submittal
ILC req'd
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Board/Staff Action
Action:
Limit of disturbance be established at rear of lot.
past this point in future
staff approved with
conditions
No development to occur
Town Planner:
Date: Mry
Project Name:
DocumeDtl
Allison Ochs
17,2000
Illig Residence
DRB Fee Paid: $50
?
TOWN OF VAIL
Depa,'tment of Community Dev elopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
May 11,2000
Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Avon, CO 8'1620
Fax: 970-926-2993
Nancy Shapiro Adam
4975 East Preserve Ct
Greenwood Village, CO 80121
Fax: 476-9194
Dear Beth and Nancy:
The Town Council has voted to uphold both the Planning and Environmental
Commission approval of the variance requesls and Design Review Board approval of
the lllig Remodel.
Should either of you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 970-479-
2369.
Sirperely,
lU///x
Allison Ochs
Planner ll
Town of Vail
{p'"*uo""
DESIGN FEVIEW BOAFD AGENDA
Wednesday, April 5, 2000
3d)0 P.M.
MEETING RESULTS
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department
FII t gof ,,
MEMBERS PRESENT
Clark Brittain
BillPierce
Hans Woldrich
Melissa Greenauer
Doug Cahill
SITE VISITS
MEMBERS ABSENT
11:30 pm
1:30 pm
1. Daly -782 Potato Patch Drive
2. Young - 1452 Lions Ridge Loop
3. O'Brien -2992 A Bellflower4. Vail Golf Course pump station - 700 S. Frontage Rd. East
Driver: Brent
PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Swearing in of reappointed DRB members, Clark Brittain and Hans Woldrich.
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk.
2. Election of 2000 Chair- Clark Brittain
2000 Vice-Chair- Bill Pierce
VOTE:5-0
3:00 pm
5-0
5-0
3. Vail Golf Course - Pump station.
700 S. Frontage Rd. Ea'st/Tract A, Vail vatley 4n Fiting.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Jim Meyers
MOftOru: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:5-0
Ann
Ann
TABLED (Staff shall review based on the applicant revising the building materials and proposing
additional landscaping)
4. O'Brien residence - Separation request for detached garage in setback'
2992 A Bellflower/Lot 10, Block 6, Vail lntermountain
Applicant: J.P. O'Brien
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the large conifer by the power pole on the northeast corner of the property be preserved.
7.
d.
lllig residence - Appeal of staff approval of remodel and addition.
706 W. Forest RoacULot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6'" Filing.
Applicant: Clitf lllig, represented by Beth Levine
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Hans Woldrich
MOTION APPROVED TO UPHOLD STAFF DECISION
Scalise residence - Final review of proposed dormej changes.
2567 Arosa Drive/Lot 9, Block E, Vail das Schone 1*.
Applicant: Dennis Scalise
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Doug Cahill
Allison
VOTE: 4-0 (Pierce recused)
Allison
VOTE:5-0
George
VOTE:5-0
APPROVED W]TH 1 CONDITION:
1. That there be a clipped hip on the west dormer and the easternmost & westernmost roof .
Mountain Haus - Exterior paint color change. Allison
292 East Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Mountain Haus, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Architects
MOftOru: Doug Cahill SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
Landmark Condominiums - Exterior paint color change. ., Allison
610/612 West Lionshead Circle/Lot '1, Block 1 , Vail Lionshead 3'" Filing.
Applicant: Landmark Condominium Association, Inc., represented by_Geotf Wright
M'OTION: Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED W]TH 1 CONDTTFN:
1. That the General Store accent color be reviewed by the DRB.
9. Young residence - Conceptual review of new single-family residence with an George
employee houslng unit.
1452 Lions Ridge LoopiLot 4, Ridge at Vail.
Applicant: Mike Young
CONCEPTUAL_NO VOTE
Vail Athletic Club - Final review of a redevelopment plan.
352 East Meadow Drive/A part of Tract 3, Vail Village 1'' Filing.
Applicant: VML, L.L.C., represented by Tom Braun
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Doug Cahill
APPHOVED WITH 3 CONDITIONS:
1. Provide a fireplace layout to verify the vent location'
2. That a landscape plan be provided prior to building permit'
3. That an outdoor lighting plan be provided.
Daly residence - Final review of residential remodel. Brent
782 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 16, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch'
Applicant: Andrew Daly, represented by Gwathmey Pratt SchulE _
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE:5-0
10.
11.
\
APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS:
1. An additional stone column will be added adjacent to the entry stairway to be consistent with
the columns proposed for the new garage.
2. The stone wiil be carried to the top oi the southeast corner of the home on the first level.
3. A "limits of disturbance" fence and some form of erosion control will be added to the site plan
prior to building permit issuance.4. A P.E. stamp will be provided lor the combination retaining wall detail drawing.
5. The earthwork behind the garage addition shall have a finished grade not to exceed 2:1.
6. A drainage swale will be provided behind the garage to provide positive drainage away lrom
the structure.
12. West Vail Lodge - Conceptual review of a proposed redevelopment plan'
2211 N. Frontige Rd. (Wilst Vail Lodge)iLrit 1, Vail das Schone #3.
Applicant: Reaut Corporation
CONCEPTUAL_NO VOTE
13. Perot residence - conceptual review of a new single-family residence.
84 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 31, Block 7, Vail Village 1-'.
Applicant: Jim Morter
MOTION: SECOND:
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 19. 2OOO
VOTE:
Brent
George/
Ann
Ann
Ann
Allison
Allison
Dominic
Allison
Staff Approvals
One Track Mind - Temporary event window signs
392 Hanson Ranch Roid/Lot 1, Block 54, Vailvillage 1"' Filing.
Applicant: Tom and Ken Gart
Base Mountain Sports - Temporary event window signs.
100 E. Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1'' Filing.
Applicant: Tom and Ken Gart
Vail 21 - Remove wooden facades.
511 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead 1"'-
Applicant: Vail 21 Condominium Association, Inc.
lllig residence - Remodel and addition.
70-6 W. Forest Rd./Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6'n.
Applicant: cliff lllig
Lionsquare Lodge - Remodel ol pool area.
660 West Lionsiead Place/Tract A, Vail Lionshead 'l"t Filing.
Applicant: Lionsquare LodgeCondoAssociation
Slifer Smith and Frampton Real Estate- Flat screen TV inside window.
230 Bridge Street/Lot'B, Block 5, Vail Village 1"t.
Applicant: Brigit Taylor
Christoffersen residence - Patio enclosure.
4770 Bighom Road unit B-2A/ail Bacquet Club Townhomes.
Applicant: Ralph and Barbara Christoffersen
Ann
/
Thomburg residence - Exterior window replacement and deck alteration.
14608 Greenhill CouryLot 20, Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Tom Thomburg
lllig residence - Addition of exterior door.
706 W. Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6' .
Applicant: cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine
Nye residence - New hot tub.
2581 Larkspur Lane/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Richard and Kristen NYe
Dowie residence - Interior conversion.
795 B Potato Patch Drive/Lot 26, Block 1, vail Potato Patch 1st Filing.
Applicant: Robert Dowie, represented by Eric Johnson
Willaman residence - Additon/attic space conversion above garage.
1458 Greenhill CourUlot 21 , Glen Lyon Subdivison.
Applicant: Verne Williman
Lyons residence - Addition to living room under existing porch roof'
4415 Bighorn Road, unit #1iLot 1 , Victorians at Vail.
Applicant: Gary and Jan Lyons
Allison
Allison
Ann
Ann
Ann
George
The applications and information about the proposals are availab_le for public_inspection during regular oflice
hours'in the project planne/s otfice, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 lor information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Teiephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT;
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
March 13, 2000
A request for variances from Section 12-6D-6, and Section 12-14-6, Town
of Vail Code, to allow for an addition and deck expansion, located at 706
W. Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6'n Filing.
Applicant: Cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine /
Planner: Allison Ochs
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, Cliff lllig, represented by Beth Levine, is requesting variances from Section
12-6D-6, and Section 12-14-6, Town of Vail Code, to allow for an extended entry, trash
enclosure and deck expansion, located at 706 W. Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village
6'n Filing. The addition is proposed for only the secondary unit and includes two dormer
addilions at the back (do not require a variance), a dormer addition in the front, a trash
enclosure beneath an exsting deck, an extended entry, and deck expansion. The existing
duplex was constructed in 1980. Because the lot has slopes in excess of 4Oo/o, the house
is built into the front setback, which was allowed at the time of construction. The primary
side of the duplex received a variance in June of 1998 to allow for the enclosure of a deck
within lhe front setback. Originally, the primary side applied for a variance whictr would allow
for a dormer addition in the front setback. A motion was made by the Planning and
Environmental Commission to deny the variance requests. However, lhe motion failed due
to a lack of a second. The applicant then requested to be tabled and the dormer addition in
the setback was removed from the proposal. The variance for the deck enclosure was then
granted with one condition: That a limit of disturbance line be established at the rear of the
unit and no development was to occur beyond this line in the future.
The following is a description of each of the variance requests:
r Dormer: adds mass in the setback, but does not alter the existing footprint of the
building. (12-6D-6)
r Trash Enclosure: decreases side setback from 15' to 6', but is beneath an
existing deck. 127.5 sq. ft. of GRFA is added in setbacks. (12-6D-6)
r Deck: expands existing fronl deck around to meet the existing side deck and
adds approximately 12. sq. ft. of deck area into front setback. Does not change
existing front deck setback. (12-1+6)
. Entry-way: increases foot print of building, and adds mass in the setback. Does
not extend past existing building and is in the location of an existing deck. 64 sq.
fi. of site coverage and approximately 12O sq. ft. of GRFA is added in the front
setback. (12€D-6)
fri\)t$t
nvndvtnfP
[.
The proposed dormer additions at the rear of ihe unit do not require a variance.
Approximately 350 sq. ft. of GRFA is added from the additions. Reductions of the plans,
along with the applicant's stalement of request have been attached for reference.
Correspondence from the adjacent property owner has also been included for reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback
variances (Section 12€D-6 and 12-144) to allow for the entry addiiion, trash enclosure,
dormer addition, and deck expansion subjecl to the following flndings;
1. Thal the granting of the setback variance does not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations qn other properties in the
Primary/Secondary Zone District.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental {o the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted because there are exceptions or extraordinary
circumstances or condilions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not
apply generally to other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone
District.
Should the Planning and Environmenlal Commission choose to approve these variance
requests, staff recommends the following condition:
1. That a limit of disturbance be established at lhe rear of the unit and no develooment
is to occur beyond this line in the future.
ROLES OF THEREVIEWING BOARDS
Plannino and Environmenlal Commission:
Action: The PEC is responsible for final approvaUdenial of a variance.
The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for:1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to atlain the objectives of this Title without
grant of special privilege.
3. The effecl of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.4. Such other faclors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance.
Design Review Board:
Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a variance, but must review any accompanying
DRB apptication.
The DRB is responsible for evalualing the DRB proposal for;
1. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings2. Fitting buildings into landscape3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography4. Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site6. Acceptability of building materials and colors
7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms8. Provision of landscape and drainage9. Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures
10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances
1 1. Provision of outdoor lighting
IV. ZONING STATISTICS
Lot Size: 58,498 sq. ft.Zoning: PrimaryiSecondary ResidentialHazards: Slopes in excess of 3oo/o
Allowed P/S Existinq ProposedGRFA: 7,525 sq. ft. 6,951 sq. ft. 7,303 sq. ft.
Primary 4,430 sq. ft. 4,232 s9. ft. no change
Secondary 3,095 sq. fl. 2,719 sq. ft. 3,071 sq. ft.
Setbacks:Front: 20' 9' 9'
West Side: 15' 15' 6'
Rear: 15' 175' 172'Deck: 15' 8' 8'
Site Coverage'. 8,775 sq. ft. (15%) 3,866 sq. ft. (7%)
V. CRITER]A AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Regarding the Setback Variances'.
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
Staff feels that there will be no detriment to other uses and structures in the
vicinity. All of the proposed additions are minimal and will only serve to
enhance the sunounding uses and structures. This proposal will also help
to match this unit with the imDrovements done to the other unit in 1998,
Cunently, the stain of the siding does not match, nor do the deck railings.
The applicant is proposing to match all materials and colors of the other unit.
Staff feels that these improvements will be a benefit to the neighborhood.
In addition, the Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the plan at its
March 1,2000, meeting and had no negative comments. The DRB has
directed staff to "staff approve" the proposal should the Planning and
Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance requests.
The degree to which relief frbm the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objec,tives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Due to the extremely steep slopes in this neighborhood, staff feels that there
are extreme circumstances which warrani the requested variances. Staff
feels that it is important to minimize site disturbance to these extremely steep
slopes at the rear of the house, which pushes development to the front of the
house. The house was originally allowed in the front setback due to these
steep slopes. There are other residences in this neighborhood that encroach
into setbacks, via either variances or built under regulations which allowed
these encroachments, including lots 10, 't2, and 13. The other unit at this
location received a variance to enclose an existing deck in the tront setback.
While stafi recognizes that these requests are beyond a deck endosure, the
proposal does not encroach any further into the front setback ihan the
existing building. Staff does noi believe that this is a grant of special
privilege.
The effec't of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facililies and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impacts associated with
this proposal, if constructed, on the above-referenced criteria.
The Planning aN Envircnnrenhl Commission shall make the followirry findings before
gnnting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitaiions on other properlies classified in lhe same
district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimenlal to the public health,
safety or welfare, or malerially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
o
b. There are exceptions or edraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to he same sile of the yariance that do not app|y generalty
to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified.regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
5
Beth Levine, Architect
P.O.Box 1825
Avon, CO 81620
(970)965099 (phone)
e7qnG2993 (fax)
Illig Residence Remodel
706 W. Forest Road
Vail; CO 81657
Lot: 9 Block: I
Filing: Vail Village 6'h
Pucet 210107211022
Written Statement
l-31-00
The Duplex at 706 Forest Road was remodeled on the east side in 198. The owner of
tlle west half would like to remodel the west side. The east side did an extensive rernodel
and thus left the west halflooking very poorly because the east side no longer matches
the west side. CliffIllig's intent ofhis remodel is to make both sides look like a coulmon
home again. Cliffs intention is to match all tb€ east balfs new details with regard to
railings, color and expansive dormers. Thuq the west balf would like to have a variance
for an expanded entrance and a trash enclosure as was done on tbe east half The remodel
on the west half will help the €ntire structure to cornply with the T.O.V. regulations bi
making both halves read as one structue again There will be no firrther effect of light,
air, distribution of population, transportation, tafrc facilities, utilities or public safety on
Forest Road as a resuh of this addition
Beth Levine, Architect
P.O. Box 1825
Avon, CO 81620
(97 0)926 - 509 9 (ph on e) .
(970)926-2993 (fax)
Illis Residence
Remodel
706 W. Forest Road
Vail, CO 81657
Lot: 9 Block: I
Filing: Vail Village 6'h
Parcel:210107211022
Photographs of Existing Duplex
1-3 l -00
The remodel ofthe west half of the duplex, the
lllig Residence, will be built to match the rernodel
done in 1998 on the east halfofthe duplex.
'"lc e ut5tr
,t=F:
.-irF
E:,=-t =!ttbT
l
i
t^V
--==:--;
o.a-.
v
':,4t-,, ,.
t., ' l
',il /
,. t: i-j,1 i
i', f ,-qQdh,,,'
I
(,,Y'
4D(!
O'rW
Itt
E-omlu
FEB 1? 2000
IUSA Investments' lnc.
East Preserve Court
Vill4e, CO 80121
303-77V0779
Fax 30&7G8918
February 12,2000
By Certified Mail--Retum Receip Requested
Planning and Environmental Connnission-Please Distnbute to All Menibers
Town olvuil
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: 706 Forest Road Vail, CO
Lot 9, Block t, Vail Village 6th Filing
706 Forest Road is a property zoned prirnary-secondary' -k-*" the owners of the
prirnary unit at this uaOr"rr. In tod"y', mail, we received notice from the Town of Vail
that the ownef of the secondary *ti it going before this Conrmission on February 28'
2000, seeking a variance inthe Town of Vail Code'
We understand that the Commission does not want to get in the middle of disputes
between adjoining lanrdowners. Howevet, we need to make the Conrnission aware of
the fact tlai tfre ipplicant may not have the legal right to probeed with his application
for several reasons. We are not nrcrely the adjoining landorvners but may in fact bt -fu
joint landowners to the property affected Uitfre application. Since the applicant has
i"rua to provideus.witbirisffisedplans, we have to rely rryon the description infte
Town's notice that indicates the affeited property may be owned jointly with us'
When the property was developed the owners of each unit unit received sole title to
the portion-of *t" p.p"t y treir rlrit encorpassd with *re rernaining e*erior property
being conveyed j;intly to UotU unit owners. ,
To_ the :f"T the.applicant is attempting
to extend tlre se"orrdaryunit into the existing land orfside the rrrit walls, we may in fact
be co-ownen of fte property affected by the application and, as suctr, do not agree to
or otherwise support zuch application
Further, the Townhouse Declaration which sncurnbeE this ptoperty requires thrc
conseniof the adjoining owner before any exterior modifications canbe made to the
-/ o o
/
. .y' propefi. The applicant has failed to c.omnlv with this.re.luirement' The applicant has
, failed to provide us with the relevanr inromlation, including ":.hj1::T1 tlSt*:-T;T;t"$,"J;;;"; o' o, uoorove. Having faiied to complv with this fimdamental
requirement that governs any-improvement olthe property, the applicant is premature
in submitting this matter to the Commission at this time'
We respectfrrlly rcquest ti'rat the Commission deny this aPPlication and otherwise table
this matter until the uppti.*, has complied witt, ait of ttre iegal requirements to proceed
;ili;;;il*ort orrtrri, property as well as the appliianl being able to establish
that he has exclusive title to the properfy on which this work is proposed to be done'
Due to prior out-of-town commifrnents, we will not be able to attend this hearing to
voiCb these inatters ;;;il1"t r:equest that the issues raised in this letter be heard
and relied upon in denying the application'
Respectfully submitted,
NSA Investnents, Inc.
?"u^lt^t-
U
By: Nancy S. Adarr! President
NSA lnvestm , lnc.
o
ents
4975 East Preserve Court
Greenwood Village, CO 80121
303-770-0779
Fax 303-7704918
Ove*Pl b-rlT- Cca,t t €R-
BY FAX 97 0-47 9-2452 --and HAD[rDEtfvERf
March 23,2000
To: Allison Ochs, Planner, Town of Vail
(:lloe
Re: 706 Forest Road, Vail, CO
we are the owners of the Primary unit at this property. Enclosed please find a
duplicate copy of the formal request for an appeal b9fo1e the Town of vail Town
cormcil of the-granting of the uu.i*." applied for by the Secondary unit owners'
We are submitting this letter to formally object to your staff approval of their remodel
plan despite notice of our objections to ,ittn Ot* despite-our.repeated efforts and
requests to meet to discuss these matters, and without ever affording us an opportunity
to be heard on these matters.
For more than two months now, we have been corresponding with you as the Town
Planner, and Beth Levine, the architect for the o*"it of the Secondary Unit a! this
property, asking for a meeting to discuss oru concerns about any exterior remodel of
the Secondary unit. we were surprised to leam yesterday-that you staffapproved the
f-por.O remodel witho't a formal Design Review Board Hearing and without gving
us an opportunity to express ow objections. The fact that we did not receive the
corstnrction drawings frfm Ms. Levine until three (3) days ago--apparently after you
had staffapproved this project-means we were not afiorded an opportunity to review
or commerf to the proiosed project prior to your staffapproval despite our repeated
requests to be heard on this matter.
In light of the numerous written and verbal notices you had as to our concems about
anyremodel ofthe secondary unit and our repeatedrygrlsts for an opportrmity-to be
heard on these matters, *" fird your staff approval of this project without any formal
Design Review Board Hearing objectionable and request your withdrawal of approval
and the scheduling of such a hearing with notice so we can be present at the hearing.
When we first spoke, I pointed out to you that outstanding title and restihrtion issues
remain to be resolved. The Secondary Unit Owners do not have sole title to the
property affected by their variance application. With notice of the joint ownership of
this land and notice that the co-owner of the land objects to the proposed project, we
are surprised that you would proceed on the variance application at a hearing for which
you had notice that we could not be present and then follow that up by giving this
rnatter staffapproval wittrout notice to us nor any formal Design Review Board hearing
on this matter.
We are particularly concemed to learn that the Plarming and Environmental
Commission did not timely receive either of our letten formally opposing this
application and requesting that the matter be denied or at least posQoned to a later
hearing date so that we could be present to voice our concenui
We question whether the Design Rbview Board was provided copies of orn formal
objection letter dated February 12,2000. Please advise.
Since we fust leamed about their desire to expand the Secondary Unit we have
consistently and responsively fried to be in contact with you and Ms. Levine. We have
tried to cooperate with the Secondary Unit Owners in their desire to expand their
property while maintaining the desig!, li$t,
"o,
privacy, and views that the urits have
enjoyed for 20 years. We have repeatedly asked for and made ourselves available for
meetings. Our offers of dates and times have rotrtinely NOT been responded to,
leaving us sitting at the property waiting to meet with the other party but no one has
shown nor even been so courteous as to call and advise that they would not be there.
It is inpossible to meet with someone who refuses to show up and meet or to respond
to offered meeting times.
last weeh we offered at least 5 different meeting times when I am in Vail next week
formyfarnily's springvacation Again, Ms. Levine has chosento leave tovm withott
responding.
On Monday, we received from Ms. Levine the construction drawings. We have
reviewed the same an4 in addition to the outstanding legal issues as tb title to the
property and restitution for damages caused to the Prirnary Unit by the Secondary Unit
dwing the prior remodels, we raise the following concems:
1. Front Entry: We object to the expansion of the front entry into the front set
back for several reasons. First, it is contrary to the design fi:nction of this Primary-
Secondary Property. One of the biggest criticisms and concems with Primary-
Secondary Properties is the lack of privacy and separation of space. A quick walk up
and down West Forest Road will confirm that the Design Review Board has been
sensitive to this issue by approving projects which maintain a separation of space
betweenthe entrances to the two units. Every Primary-Secondary Property located on
West Forest Road has a clear separation of space between the entry areas for each unit.
The original development of 706 Forest Road was designed to separate the two trnits
by building the Prirnary Unit forward towards the street and recessing the Secondary
Unit back towards the hillside. The stepping of the two trnits is maintained consistently
on both the front and the back sides of the property.
The proposal to expand the Secondary Unit's entry into the front setback brings the
entry space into the same plane as the Primary Unit's entry, defeating the separation
of space and privacy so finrdamental to the design of this property. The fact that the
door to the Secondary Unit will be a side entry does not overcome this encroachment.
In fact, a side entry will only create more problems--when visitors and delivery people
only see one door fromthe street, they will mistakenly assume there is one entry and
ring our bell or leave us packages when the Secondary Unit is the desired location.
The Design Review Board's desire to avoid expansive single plane designs was
addressed last spring with the Maniott's proposal. I was at the hearings when the
Marriott was required to break up the monotonous plane and step back part of the
project along the bike path. We do not wrderstand why you would staffapprove the
Secondary Unit's encroachment into ttre front set back to achiwe a specific design flaw
that the Design Review Board objects to and has required other parties to avoid.
Clearly, a compromise can be achieved if a real "necessity'' exists to justifu the
gnnting of a variance:that would be to build out the Secondary Unit's entry just
enough to bring it to the same plane as its garage and leaving the entry door facing the
street to clearly differentiate between the two entries. This compromise will enable
some expansion of space while maintaining the firndamental design feature of this
property.
We heard your rationalization for the granting of this aspect of the variance on the basis
that it affords like teahnent for the gnnting of tlre variance to enclose our comer deck
However, critical differences exists in these matters. Our deck enclosure was on the
east end of our property-far away from the Secondary Unit. The enclosure had no
adverse irryact on the Secondary Unit and, to oux recollection, was not objected to by
the Secondary Unit Owners.
Further, our enclostne of the comer of the east deck was just tlnt--enclosure of the
existing deck. In contrast, the Secondary Unit Ownen are seeking to enclose the space
under their deck PLUS an additional3 feet into the front set back. Their request is
more expilnsive and invasive into tlre set back than our application.
In applying your concem for comparable treatnent to both variance applications, we
again suggest the following conpromise: allow the entry to the Secondary Unit be
expanded to enclose the space under the deck which would bring it to the same plane
as is garage and leaving the entry door facing the sheet to clearly differentiate between
the two entries. This compromise will enable some expansion of space while
maintaininga linear separation of space which is such a frrndamental desrgn feature of
this property.
2. Trash Enclosure Variance: The Secondary Unit Owners have applied for
a variance to build a trash enclosure on the west side of their unit. We rmderstand and
appreciate the desirabilrty to have a trash enclosure. However, we again ask that this
matterbe limited to wbat is reasonably necessary and what is consistent with the hash
enclosures allowed throughotrt the neighborhood. A quick tour of West Forest Road
will confirmthat the hash enclosures that have been constmcted are limited in size and
space to store the necessary hash cans and recycling bins. The enclosure requested by
the Secondary Unit owners is massive in conparison. It is far more invasive than is
reasonably necessary to achieve the purpose for which it is requested. Ag"tn, we are
willingto work with a conpromise on this matterthat would enable the Secondary Unit
Owner to constmct a trash enclosure in the connnonly owned land that is reasonable
in size and design
3. Front Dormer and Chimney Extension: Ms. Levine has conveniently used
the 1980 blueprints to superinrpose her renrodel upon. In doing so, she has failed to
modifu the Primary Unit to show the current design of this unit and the adverse inpact
her design will have on our li$t, ah ventilatioq views and privacy. There are
operable windows located along the west wall of the Primary UniL the fimction of
which will be adversely affected by the massive dormer proposed by the Secondary
Unit Owners right in front of these windows. We reasonably object to this adverse
impact being inrposed upon ow property.
When we designed our remodel of the Primary Unit, we did so with sensitivity to the
aesthetics of the property, increasing our window space while maintaining a balance
and proportion in the use of windows and siding. We find the proposed expansive use
of glass on the south wall of this property to be excessive and inconsistent with the
design and look of the property.
The predecessors in title to the Secondary Unit wanted to do a glass and modern
project on this property similar to the expansive use of glass in the current proposal.
However, after spending over a year trying to come up with an acceptable design, they
accepted that such a look would not be compauble with the property and decided to sell
the unit to the current owners so they could do their own project on Beaver Dam Road.
The current owners knew or should have known of such design limitations and should
not be allowed to pursue such an inconsistent approach to the current design of the
property. Again, we ask that any exterior changes to the Secondary Unit be as
sensitive and consistent with the current design of the property as our remodel
achieved.
In summary, we object to the massive use of glass and massive height of the front
dormer. Both the height and volume of glass is disproportiornte and inconsistent for
the design ofthis property. The adverse impact such work will have on the design of
the property and on the privacy, air, ligfot, ventilation and views of the Primary Unit
preclude our approval of this aspect of the proposed remodel.
4. Addition of Deck and Dormer to Southeast Bedroom: As previously
discussed, our design of the expansion to the Primary Unit was approved because of
its sensitivity to the use, privacy, enjoyment, air, light ventilation, and views of the
Secondary Unit We designed our expansion of space to be on the opposite end of the
propertyfromthe connnon wall. We did not advenely impact any of the views, light,
air, ventilation, orprivacy of the Secondary Unit. A substantial distance exists between
the common wall and the space added to our unit .
In contrast, the Secondary Unit's proposal adds a deck and dormer to the Southeast
bedroorn The effect of this desrgn will be a direct and adverse inpact on the aL
light, privacy and view of the two of the westem bedrooms in the Primary Unit. For
Gr" ,.uro*, we object to this portion of theirproposal.
5. Addition of Deck and Dormer to Southwest Bedroom: For the reasons
discussed above, we do not object to the addition of space to this bedroorn Like our
remodel of the Primary Unit, tlrc addition of space at this end of the Secondary Unit
does not adversely rrpact our ligtrq air, views, ventilation or privacy. Subject to thg
conditions discussed for any rernodel of the Secondary Unit, we do not object to this
portion of the proPosed Project.
6. Replacenent of Railings and Matching of Siding: Likewise, we appfove
of and encourage the proposal to replace the siding and the railins to match the work
done to the PrimarY Unit.
7. New Door and Window on West Wall: It appears tlr,at the proposal includes
changing out the existing sliding glass door and replacing it with an operable door and
wittrl *indo* abovelt along the west wall of the Secondary Unit. Subject to otlr
concerns for any exterior tt*odtl of the Secondary Unit, we do not object to this
aspect ofthe proposed remodel. In contrast to the excessive, disproportionate arnount
of glus proplsed for the front side of the Secondary Unit, we ttrink that the opposite
diJproportion exists in the plan for the west side of the rmit' We encourage the
s"corroa.y unit owners to c-onsider expanding the glass incorporated on this side of
their unit to take advantage of the aftemoon sunligft, sunsets, ventilation and beautiful
westem views to be enjoyed from this rnit-
E. Additional Matters: We have tried to be thorough and responsive to the
aspects of the proposed remodel as we can determine from our review of the
constnrction drawins received from Ms. Levine on March 20,2000' If there are other
aspects to the proposat that we have not addressed" we ask that you point out these
matters to us and we reserve the right to address them at ttrat time.
g. conditions Precedent to Any Consenf Finally, please note that the
Townhouse Declaration that encurnbers this property requires the consent of the other
unit owner prior to any exterior remodel of a unit. Our willingness to consent to any
exterior changes to
-the
secondary unit is conditioned upon resohtrion of the
outstanding legal issues first. These issues include restitution to us for the damages
caused bv ttt" Secondary unit owners during the prior remodels, resolution of the title
issues, and adequate insurance/assurances that the Primary Unit will not suffer
additional damage as a result of any remodel to the Secondary Unit. We must not be
put in a situation in the future that we are currently in-of having to file liens and
lawsuits as a result of damage to our unit by the actions of the Secondary Unit Owner.
For the numerous reasons set forth above, we ask that you withdraw the staffapproval
you have given to this project. Your failure to do so rnay necessitate the filing of a
lawsuit to enjoin this project fromproceeding, an expensive and adversarial process we
have been working diligently to avoid.
By copy of this letter being sent by fax to Ms. Levine, we are gwi.tg notice to the
owners of the Secondary Unit of our denial of consent pursuant to the Townhouse
Declarations and our request for an appeal to the Town Council of the granting of the
variance and issuance ofstaffapproval on this project.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Very truly yours,
NSA Investnents, Inc.
cc: Beth Levine--BY FAX 970-926-2993
o
lnvestmentsNSA
303-77tr0779
Fax 30$77G8918
BY FAX and CERTIFIED MAIL-.RETURN RECEIPT REQTJESTED
970479-2452
March 17,2000
Ms. Alison Osch, Town Plarurer
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Variance for 706 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado
We are the owners ofthe Primary Side of this property. Pursuant to the Town of Vail
Code, we request an appeal to the Town Council of the granting of the variance
application by the Planning and Erviroilnental Conrmission on March 13, 2000;
Please advise when this matter will be set hearing by the Town Council.
Thank you,
NSA Investnents,Inc.
,-/4J-^-e,.flufu-n,
Cnpr r)ln *l'
By: Nancy S. AaanL President
4975 East Preserrre Gourt
Greenwood Mllage, CO 80121
o
4975 East Presenre Court
Greenrrvood Village, CO 80121
303-770-0779
Fax 303-770-8918
BY FAX and CERTIFIED MAIL--RETIJRN RECEIPT REQUESTED
970-479-24s2
March 17,2000
Ms. Alison Osch, Town Planner
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Variance for 706 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado
We are the owners ofthe Primary Side ofthis property. Pursuant to the Town of Vail
Code, we request an appeal to the Town Council of the gnnting of the variance
application by the Planning and Environmental Commission on March 13, 2000.
Please advise when this nmtter will be set hearing by the Town Council.
Thank you,
NSA Investments. Inc.
h^rCaP, ulz '/-
President
NSA Investments, Inc.
By: Nancy S.
Mavi-30-€o ()4r34P Nl Investirlen_t_:,. Inc.
REQUIRED Fon RLING AI{ AP?EAL or A srArfr, DESIGN RDvrDw toAnD onPIAITINING AI{D DNVTNONMDNTAL GOMIIIII|SION TCT|ON
P -O7tAcE 2rS
TTNNOF
.A-
1 Llr,.i
,,-ff rt
t-
) r"7-'.,-#t
BEING A.:14
u[-
'- l(t
.!t'>l t
c'l' rt
DATeoFAcrror{/DEcFtoN;lJ.r, gc_4lriil" I l.-,i a*,B.
c.
t-
N^ME OF BOARD O* PERSON RENDERNG flE DECNION/TAKNG ACTbN:
A rl
NAME OFAPFEII.AI{T(S),
3 {'.' i:);v.s,Lr('-C t t r-l r (T-c: t-t 1 (.r :(LtAILD.IG
PTTYSrcALADDRESS tNV \ l(n H h-i, r.e,d.. c,
I.EOAI DESCRIPTIOT.I OF
^F.?ELIA{IE IROPERTY IN VAIL:\ . t 'l.ri\ V,(trik [;'', L-t;
sIGt{^lURE{gr
P1gc I of2
crf "i
Li l/
'4t.1'1'70-ct'1
, lf /t"'','sx
l') (.,,: g
E
rMarr-.3O-OO
04:34P NO Investm€nts, Inc-
Docs &ir .pp!.| iarolvo r qgcifc Frcct ef lud? Ja, [ycr. fla* prwi& rtc folloea'a3 infrroricr: -
rr),ururdjrcnrpropcrtyomar v.,,L, no- h1-;'it:)Y'1'.^l:.:J'.""'' i'f' tl [)')r'-tto'r
{.rf'-l Ju( [,1\:J)<', tcl-
lf aq givc r dcrrilod ryhdm of hov yor lrc rr "rggricverl a dvcndy *ri* ,rt*" ".{ggricvctt or
rdvcody dftcad psro- marr uy pcnor who will lrf,cr ra dranc cftcr to ra iasrrr lttmd n
fitttlctcd by this tidc. ILe dlcgcd rdvcrre inrcrtt mry be strrcd ia comnm wftt ulc uorbcrs drhc
contriltrity rkBc.bu,rbdt crcctdbdcjrc.tistcocnl irrtscgbcoranrunity 3ultl$rulby dl D!r:dl5.
P-OA
F.
G.Proyidc dr rrc rnd drlnrscs (bab pe-non's nrilirr3 nldrcs rnd progary'r ptysicel edrtres in Vril) of ell
ormes of popcrty wlict rrc &c nrbjcu od thc ryirel rnrl rtl rdjurr prrogsrty oyncrs (imtudia ]ropcfticsrtprretcd bv r rigln-of.rrry, rtrer4 or or[c innrwoiag b.dicr). Atso fovirlc rddrrsca ud Jfucd arrlcropcs for
_crlprqrr1g*nrmtblin
h rryra sb o(tro6- sp.cify tb Fcbc Dutll of fu rDc.l. Flc* cic rpeific codc scufors hrving
tclcvrttc,C to thr uiolr bciry egpcdcd"
F-EE: 3000
It
Pqc 2 of2
P -tz
rumf0r
L
APPI'AI S r.ORlf,I
RDQUIRED TOR NLINC AN A"PIEAL OF A STAFF, DDSIGN REVTEW DOARD ON,PI.A!{MI.IG AIrID ENV|nON!,DFT]AL COMT}IISSION ACIION
D^TEOFACTTOMDECTVOW
NAME oF BOARD oR pEnsoN RENDERTNG THE D€crsloiurAKNG ACTrcN:_
T\4 rrrr irv, z1 lirl t-:.n v, r,,.r^ l.rra lt l<.f fff
NAMEOF^PFEIJ,ANT(S).
' l-S t . P rv' :g ,7:{('f:2, ,+, (.-f.t-(;t 1LL,t .<r t 1.,. ll fi;tz i
B"
c.
IUAILING
PFYSICAL ADDRESS TN VAIL -/tr(,. /l F ?-,1-., ,:r ilt (, c,,r[
slGNAtuRF.(S):E
pRop6RTynrvru.: t-rr-l' d:t . lt(t,r".p- / , ---
17:(. rl
LECAL DHiCRIPTK}N OF Af?EIIAlrr.S
Pqe I of2
Ma!:.--3q: .ro- 04:-35P .lril$ rnvcstmcnts' rrrc-U
Docs fir.ppcd involvc e gecifc prrcct of lrad?lf yer pl*c povidc thc follorirag io&rurion:
rtyogurdjrcarpopcrtyourt? V*,}- no
It".l 1t'c jzr''{ 6r.L'r4'r irr' t( lrt . ltlg.l ,l
Ifuo,gircrdrrdldcahdonoflrovydrlErrstllfi€v€dBadrurclyrfrctcdDcf!or"-'Attrisvcdor
Avcrsdy Ccd pcrm-ncus zyplttoo who witl $t ftrrr ltrsrc c&t rer inEslttFoEdc
firrdrcrcd uy6irddE Thc zllctld eivctc incc$ mryte frrcd b corunn wi6 cbcr msubc$ offic
courrrig r lrrgc. tur ${l crccd b da3rcc $E EElcrd il!!!tsr b coorrrrnity 3Fd rhrcd by ell ptrsors-
Provrdctlc nrqeadddnsc (bcb prlon'e mlilinjddnssud poecry'tDtyricd.ddrtrr in vdl) ddlwrurr of popatY vliA ue tic arbjar o'f rtc Sed rndrtt rdjrrnr pr,qrty o*ncrs (irfudirg p:3p.rticaqrrrd by a dglc+6q, lw.r'L or uhcr irravaing bsic$). Also povi& erlircscrt rrrd lrapcd alvclrycs for
?Apgrryornrorhclis-
Qn rgrt3 r[rrs of n 0c. {cciry th! DrELrc uurc sf tf,c ry9crl. Pl€|e oiG tPccift codc sccriors lningrdcrurc ro thr rcrior bciag Spcat€d,
FEE: t0.00
P- t3
F.
G.
H.
Pge2of2
Sent 8y: NSA#IIWESTMENTS#INC ;o 3037708S1 8;23-00 5:35PU;Page 1/8Mar -o
Ilgl lrrrctrrentrt Itlo.
4975 Easl ftercne C;our
Gtsu,ood Vf hgp. CO 0Ol 21
30t?nolofTg
Far: Slrtl$lS
BY FAX g7V7g-24s2 -md HAND DELIVERY
March 23,2000
To: Allison Ochs, Plarner, Town of VaiI
Rc:705 ForestRoad, Vail" CO
we are the onmers of the ftimary unit at this property. Enclosed pl€asc- find a
A,rpfittt copy of ttrc fott"f ttq*t for an ryrylt b€foT ftc Town of Vail lown
i"*rn ortfre-g'dingortn" "ttittte applierl for by the Sccondary Unit Owners'
we are nfimittirrg ftis tetter to fonmlly object to yorr staf approval of thsir re'lltod€l
plendespibnoticeorornobjectiorsto*r'n'*dcspiteorr.repeatedeff|ortseld
;.q|g,;rr*ttodccus- aese,rnrers, ann wftorn wer affordirrgw an oppottnity
to be hpard on thesc rnattcrs.
Forrnorc ffuntwomonths ru)w, we havc been withyou, agrho Toyn
planrer, ad B61h I;tr", G ;nbile for tbe owo"n of tlrc $econdarv Unit Et &iE
prropcrty, asking for a m*iog to disctss our conocftls abo$ any "'dcrior
f€model of
rbe Soccndry U"ft. W" ;lryris"d to lcam yestarday that you staff appmved 0ro
Foposed ffirod8t *i6orf a format DcsiSn neyiew Boari Heuing and witbout giv'IDg
rsanopportrnityt"',e**'"objecdq:Ttofaathatwedidnotrsceiveth€
c@s6.rctior d"awi'S-il; Ms. tsvirp rdil thrco (3) daysagp-appam'dly aftcr you
lud statrapprrwedbisproject*manr we worc not aftbrdod rn oportunity to rwicw
or corrgprt t t" p*ioJ project prior to your stafrapproval despitc our repcated
rc$rests to be beanrl on this natter'
h ligtt of the mnrerorrs written and veftal notic€s pu had a: to our concsrns about
dy ffidel ortro sc"ona*y unit afd oy rcpeatdTgt|*ts for an oporturity to bc
heard ur tnese nau"ril;fftgux g"g' opit*tl of tiis project witborf any fonrnl
Sent By: NSA#IWESTMENTS#INC ;o 303770891€;3-00 5:38P ;
Dcsigt R€v*,wBmdHearingobjectionablc anri reqrrcst pur withdrawal of apploval
and fte schoduling of such a heering withnotice so we cmbe prc$€nt at the bcsring;
Wh€n we first spoke, I poirrted ott to )rou that or$standing title and restihiliort ie8r|es
remein to be resolvcd. The Seoondary Unit Owrcrs do not have sole title to tbc
property afrectcd by their variance application. Widr notice of the joint ormership of
ttls-Una anO notice that the oo<twner of the lrnd objects to the prcposd prujec[ we
8r€ surpriscdth* pu uruuld pnocccd cn drcvariuce applicafon at a hearing for uthich
you had notice that wc could not be prrcsclt sod tlrcn follow that rry bV gvng Otis
tnaflEr shffappronat withou noticc to us oor my foffil Design Rwiew Board tFsring
mthis matt€r.
We are particularly concemed to leam ttnt tbe Plarrring and Enviromrcntal
Conmission did not tinrly recsivc cithsr of our leficrs fonrally opposing thic
applicrtion and requostirrg 6at the mattor be denied or at least posQoned to a latcr
heariqg dele so thst we corrld bc prcsent to voice oru concsrns
Wc question whther the Desip Ro,iow Boatd was pmvidod copi6 of orr fomnl
objection l€osrdated Febnury 12,2000. Pleasc advisc.
Since we ftrst hard aborn their dcsire to etpcnd the Secondary Unit, we have
cqaistcotly md responsivelyticd to be in codaot wilh yorr rnd Ms. Lovirc. We havc
tricd to coorperate with the sccondsry unit owrprs in th€ir desire to e:gad tbcir
pmpcrty u,hil€ rmirfainingtre 4esig, li&t, air, priracy, and views ttatthe rnits have
e4oyeA for ZO ycars. Wc have nepearedly ackod for and made oursehes rvaihblc for
nrcetingS. Or"r offem of dates ard tirncs have 1gtltincly NOT bcen respondod to'
leaving us siting at 0rc prqerty rvaitingto mcet with the otlrcrpertybut no one has
showr nor w€n leerl so cowteoru as to call and advise thd they would not bc thcrc.
It 1$ iryossfrbto rd with ssrrcorc uiho rsfirscs to show q and rneet orto respond
to ofrered meeting tfurrcs.
Last urce! wc offercd at least 5 ditrercnt nruting tirnes wbcn I am in Vail neld weck
formyfui[rs spri4gvacatiuu AFrn, Ms. Lsvinp has cltossr tro leavc town witborf
responding.
on Monday, we reccived from Ms. Levine the construction dnwings. w" hryt
reviewed thc sarre an{ in addition to thc outstanding lcgrl issues as to title to the
Mar-2
o
Page 218
t:". tt: NsA#IWEsrMENrs#INb 303770891 8;Itlan- 23-00 5:36PM;Page 3/8
propqty md rcsifiXim for damgps ce6od to trc P1ir6ry Unil by ttrc Secodary Unit
duringthe prior remdels, we rrisc the following concems:
r. Frut EEt'y: lVe objec't to trc expaosion of tho fiqrt €ffiy into fto frun set
bask for snrcral rcasurs. first it is comary to tbc design finstion of this Prfutary-
Secondary Propcrty. One of the bigast criticisrns and cmcerns with himrry-
S""*&ry Pr.rdrfi* is thc lack of privacy and seearation of spaco. A qutg! wal-k uF
and down Wost Forcst Road will confirm 6at the Design Rwiew Bostd hrs bccrt
sensitive to tfd6 issue by rpp'roviqg projccts which maidain a seprration of space
bctril€enfueltrrrcestoihetrrounlt". f"cryPrimry-SeomderyPropertylocatedon
West Forcst Road has a ctear scpardinn of spaoe bctrveeo 6c €tilry areas for each r[lit.
The original dovelopnrcnt of 706 Fore.S Road was dcsigrrd to reparatc thc two units
Uy Uuilding fte nirnary Unit forrvard toward$ th€ strcet and receesing tho SecondrY
fi"it tact t""rarts dE hilsnb. The S€epiqg ofthc two 'ntts is maintaincd consistatly
on bothtbe frrd and thc back sidcs of the propcrty.
Thc prorposal to expand the Secordary Unit's edry iilo the front setback bringp ttc
.,my- spi* ino mi same planc ar tlrc Primry Unit's entry, defeati4g the separatim
of spa.L rnd privacy so firndaurersal to tbe design of thle pmPc]ty. The fsct ftat the
doorto ep $rqdaty Unit will be a side €ffiy &es not orrerc,ome fhis cncruachmeNt
In frrt, a side eo[.y will mty crEab morc pmoblerns.-when Yisitors and delivery pcopla
o111l sec one dooifiornth suc€t, theywiUniSatenrty assunrc th€re is onc effryand
tiog o.rr bell or leave us packages whcn the Secondary Unit is the desired location
Tbe Desigl Rwhw Boatd's desire to avoid eiparsivc siqgle plane dcsigrc was
addrcssed-last ryrqg with the Manid's proposal. I was at thc lrcodngp uften ftc
Maniott was requinO to break rry thc rxnrctonous plure and stc,p back part of the
prcject ahng thc bike path We do not undcrstand why you wotrld Saffapp'rove the
ScionOaty U"lt's cncmochred imo tre fiont s6t bock to achieve a ryecific design flaw
ftrt the firosigp nwiew Board objecb to aud hrs rcquirEd othcr partics to avoid.
Clearly, a comprcmise oan be ashiwed if a real 'tecessitt'' existr to ju$iryfte
Sf""thg of a varianco--tbat would be to build o|lt thc S€cotdary Unit's €ntry just
*",rOt"ttUgittotte mrephne as its garap and leavingthe entrydoorfacirrgth
sto"t to cleariy differ€ntiote between the two cnties- Thie coryrmise will enabh
somc cxpansim of space wtrilc maimining thc firndsrsrtal desigR feaurc of 6is
ptoperty.
t..n. tt: fl sA#ItwEsrtlENTs#INl 3037708S1 8;ilar - 23-00 5:37P[;Page 4/8
lYe heard yorn ratimalizatirn f0 tp grdrling of &b arycC of trc variance ou fte bssis
thd it atrods litce treffi for the grdntg of 6c variance to enclose our corner deck
Howwor, critical diffe,rerrces erdsts in thcsc rnanem. Our deck enclosut€ was om tho
east eDd of our property-far away fiom thc Sscondary Unit. The eoclosunc had no
adverse iryedmG Sicduyunit an$ !o orr rccollectim, was not objectcdto by
6c SecodaryunitOwnffs.
Furttrer, our enclosurc of the corner of tlre east deck was just that--cttclonrre of thc
cxistingdeck In coffiast, thp Sccarduy(ffiOwers are seckingto enclorc the space
undcr tlrcir d€ck PLUS an additional 3 fc€t irilo 6e fi,odt sct beck Thcir reqrrest is
mrc €xpansive and invasive into tte setbackthanornapplicatim-
In applyiag your conccm for coryarable treatnent to borth varirnce applicetiom, we
again suggsst the following coryrornisc: dlow trc cntry to thc Secondary Unit bc
erpordeA t" enclose the space ruder the deck u&icl uould bring it to tbc earc phrrc
as irc ggnagp and l€wi4gmc ertydoor hcmgfu sfiEctto charly ditrcrcntiatcbstween
lhe trro cntries. This coryronrise will mable sm elgansion of space uihih
mifufisfuia a lincar sepontion of space which is such a findamemal design feahrre of
this propefy.
2. Truh Enclorurc Verlrnce: Tte SecmdaryUnit Owners have appliod for
a rrariarcs to build r trrsh enclosrrc on thc west side of their unit. Wc rnderstarul and
apptciab fte dcsinbility to have a tash englosure. Howwcr, we againaskthst ftis
naferUe linitedto uilrdis rcasqnbty noccssery aod what is cqsisteff with thc trash
crrclosues allowcd throrqlrout thc nsigbbotltood. A quick torr of $re* Forest Road
will corfrm&sttbetraSenslo$restrathavebwn cmsfiuct€d arc limitcd in size and
space to storE thc nccessuy trash cans ard recyclingbins. Tlrc etrclosur€ reque$tcd by
tbe Secondsry Unit ownsrs is mrssive in conporison. It is far mre invasive rlrrn is
reasaublynecossary to achiwc tbe pupose for which it is reqrrcsted. AFfo\ we art
wi[ingto wotkwiha oornpgniseqoftic milt€f thdlwuH coablethe Secmdary Unit
Ormerto sonctnrct a trash cnclosur€ in tlre coumnly ownpd lard thlt is reasonablc
in size aod design
3. F1an6Do16er rnd Chiurcy Erbrdon: Mf. L^slrhe has corweniently uscd
the 1980 bluc,prints to spcrirpose hcr remodcl upon Itl doing so, shc hrs fail€d to
gDdiry fte hnnary lhit to show trc c|Irrsnt d"sigrr of this unil and the adverse irPact
her design will havc on our liglt, air, ventilation views and privacy. Thprt are
opcrablJwindorvs locatcd almg the west wall of the kimary Untt, tfrc firnction of
Sent By: NSA#ITWESTMENTS#INC,;o 3037708S1 8;Man-23-00 5:38Pft;Page 5/8
which will bG advenely afrest€d by the rna$sive donrrcr proposed by tto Sccodary
Unit Owners rigft in frorrt of these windows. We reasonably objeot to this adverse
itrFct behg iqosed upon our propelty.
Wtrgn we designed our rernodel of the Priuury Unit, we did so with sasitivity to the
aesthatics of tb propcrty, increasiag our window space whilc maintaining a balerce
and proportim intbc rse ofwindorvs and siding; We find lhc prWosed opillsive usq
of gIEBE {rn tho sordh wall of this proporty to be cxcessive snd inconsist€d withthe
d€slgn and look of thc pmpetty-
The predec*som in titfe to the Secondary Unit wnrted to do a gfass ad mdem
projoct on this ptrop€rty similer [e ttrc erpansivc usc of glass in thc srrrctil propoeal.
tt nrt"er,afr€fsp€odhgwerayeartyingtocomerpwittranacceptabledcsigatlsy
scceptodtnt $rcha look wuuHmt be co,npatibh with&e prirycftyad &citod to soll
fre urit to tF clrr€d owrm so fiey could do tlpb orm psoject on Beaver Dam Road.
Tb curcrlonlm lneworstrould have known of such design limitations and should
not bs allowod to pursuc such sn inconsistcnt approach to the cunent design of the
property. ,tgFiG we ask that any er(€rior changes to &s Sccondary Unit be as
s€nsitive and consistent with lte srrrcnt design of thc property as orr rmdel
achiwod.
In sgnmrary, we object to thc mssive usc of 8ilass and rnrssivc heigfr of tbe ft'o^It
domrar. $th thu tui$t and volr"'." of glsss is disprtorportionatc md inconsisted for
tre desigp ofthis pmperty. Thc adverse iryoct such work will have on the fuign of
trc propedy and on the privacy, air, ligls vodilatim and views of the PrimaryUnit
precltde our approval of this aspect ofthcp'raposed rqnodel.
4. Addttlon of Dcck end Ilornpr to Southcgt Bcdroom: As prwiu$ly
discusee( orn dcsign of the elpamion to the Prinary Unit was apprwcd bocausc of
its sensitivity to tlre use, privacy, enjoymcril" a4 ligbt, vcntilaboq and vicws of ttre
Securdaryunit. We desigrrcd or€Qonsim of rpacc to be on tbe opposite eod of thc
prroeerty fiun the cwm wall We did m advecely rryact any of tre views, ligb,
air, vcmiUnoq or placy offu S€cmdsrJuniL A s$gafial disbnce cxists bctween
the cmnwall ard the spaceadded to ourmit.
In contrast, tte Sec@dsry Unit's proposal rdds a deck and domprto Orc Sbldheast
bedroom- The efrGct of this design will be a dirwt arrd adverse inpact on thc alr,
Sent By: NSA#INVESTMENTS#INC_;o 3037708918;llan-23-00 5:38PM;Page 6/8
liehl Drivrcy and view of the two of 0re westErn bedrcomg inthc Primary Unit' For
f ii.t"J", we object to this portion of tlnir pr'ryosal
5.AdditionofDcckrndDormertosouthteltBodrmu:Fort}teleasoos
discussedaboveweoonotoujeottotpadditionofspace"giy.*ilkcour
rcnrodcl of tfre nirnai'U"i,, il
"dditirm
otspace {qit end o.f drc Sccondarv Unit
does not adverscly irrpact oratig[6, ar, vl"*slvcmilationorprivacy' Su\iectto$
condtions diss.sscd f;;y;;d;l oittrc St.-A"ty Uniq ;e do not objcct to thb
portim of the Pro'Posed Pmjsct
6. Rcpleccnent of Rdllagr end Mebhtng of Sfdiry1.l'ikevisc' we sPprove
of and eocorragE Ur" pr"prJ to ,ipt""" tre siding-and the railings to nntch fte wott
done to the PrimarY Unit-
?.Nc*IrocrrdWindorvmWgtWrltBapearsftatteproposalPtLd":
ctraging ort Oc cxt*lng-sfiAlqg glass door aod rcpf"cutg ft Ytr * oPcrable door and
;th; iinOo* aboe-it dtd tI* we$ wall of the Secon6ary Unit' Subject to otu
conccrrs for arry €xtpfior rdodet of thc sccordary unit we do not object to this
aspect oftbe pnrpocedrcsFd8t In corrtrast to the exccssive, disproporrtbnatc arrcrnt
of glass proposcd for t|o fiDtt side of the socmdrry u^nit, wc tbink tbat tbc oppositc
disproportion exists io trtu pran for the west side- of the unit. wc e'ncourap the
secordary unit oqrcrs to considcr craading tht das* incornqpbd onflrb side of
fuir tnit to tals .fr"rilt8t of fre aftemoon t-fidtt, slnsetst verrtilation and bcalifitl
westerrrviews to bc enjoyed fromthis rmir
t. Addidond Mrtlers: We havc ficd to be frororreh and responsive 1q"
aspectsofscplDPosed'Emodelallwecandcterurirrcfrmourrwiowofthe
consn.ctftn draumr* ;oeived ftom Ms. l^wim qr Mareh 20, 2000' If thcrc arc ofihcr
aspectstotheprqosalthatwchavonotaddrece€d,weask0ratyoupoiffonthese
.,no,to*aru*"rcsewetherigfrttoaddressttE|natthattfur.
g. Condllionr prcccdent to Aly Conren$ Finally, plEese notE tltat fte
Toudorse D.rlsrd;G cncrmbsr$ grL propcny-rcquires tbe sons€tt of tbe other
w orn"r prior to *v ercrior remodclgf a |trllt- on willingncss to cffi€d to dly
ersterior chrngps t"-Jlhc; i..-O"ty Unit is oonditioned rpon rcsolrdion of thc
f,.1|;;ftrg 6bf tr,"r finil Thesc iss$s include rcstituionto rs forthc dsnagps
cruscdby&esccudaryrmourrcrse'rirrybEpri9ra:ldels,rcsoltsimoftbetitle
i's'cs, arrd adeq'ate
'irsurance/asr,r,"r,ri tt"t n" Prin'ry Unit will rot stfier
Sent By: NSA#IWESTMENTS#INC-;
.tt
3037708S18;Iar-23-00 5:39Pil;Page 7lA
additiqral dannge as a resuh of sny r€model to tbe Secoudary Unit. We mrst not bo
put h a sinratiJn in thc fiSre drat we are crntdly fotff 9"qg.to file licns and
L"r*lt* tt a rttrrt of darmgp to or rnit by$o actions of the Sccondary Unit Owrcr'
Fortre nurtnms tu16ons sd foffi abwe, we askfrlt you wifrdraw tbc staffapprwal
yotr havc Fven to thic p'rojoct Yow faihnc to do so may nrygsitato ffre filing of a
L*s,ritt"-ioindrisprojectfmmprocccding ancxpolsivo mdadvenarial Prcccss wP
havc been worthg diligpdly to avoirl
By copy of rhis le1pr bGing scnt by fax to Ms. Irvfip, we Enc gvtg noticc to the
owners-of tbe Secondary Unit of otn denial of conscrrt prrsustrt to &c Toumhouse
Declr61bns md orn rcquest for an appeal to the Town Conroil of tbc grding of 0E
variance and issuance of stafrapptwal on ttris project
We look forward to hearingfiom you.
Verytrulypur*
NSA Inverfrrcms, Inc.
4^*
By: Nancy S.
cc: Beth IivitF-BY FtXnG926-2993
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8
FAX 970-479-2452
cnpr
March 28, 2000
Beth Levine
PO Box 1825
Avon, CO 81620
Fax: 970-926-2993
Nancy Shapiro Adam
4975 East Preserve Ct
Greenwood Village, CO 80121
Fax:476-9194
I
Dear Beth and Nancy:
Here is a summary of the process for the lllig Variance and Adam Appeal:
1. The appeal of the staff approval will be heard at the Design Review Board's April 5,
2000 meeting.
2. The appeal of the variance will be heard at the April 1 1, 2000 Town Council meeting.
This date is required to meet the 30-day requirement for an appeal hearing. Should
either of the parties involved need more time to gather information, they can ask for a
continuance. This can be done either in writing or at the meeting. I will forward a
copy of all proceedings dealing with the variance to the Planning and Environmentai
Commission at their April 4,2000 meeting. A letter should be submitted at this time
if a conlinuance in requested and they will make the decision at this time.
Should either of you have any questions regarding the procedure, please feel free to
contact me at 97 047 9-2369.
{,7 "u"'"*o 'n'o
Mar-3o-oo ozl:3zlF NL rnvcstm€nts, rnc.
NSA Invesfrnents, Inc.
4975 E Presenre CT
Greenwood Village, CO 80121
303-TtV077e
FAX 303-77G89t8
March 30, 20fi)
BY FAX970-479-245?
Ms. Allison OchE Plann€r U
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontagc Road
Vail. CO 81657
Re: 706 Forest Road, Vail, CO
Lot 9, Elock l, Vail Wlagc 6t Filing
flear Ms. Ochs;
Wc arc srbmitting this letter pursuant to Clause H on thc Appcals Form you forwarded to u$ on
Marctr 28,2000, to appeal the granting ofa variance by the Planning and Environrnentsl Commi$ion
f'PEC') conccrning this propeny at thc hearing on Mardr 13, 2000.
Wc are the owners ofthe Primary Unit at 706 For€sl Road, Vail, Colorado. It is our undcrsarding
that Clifford and Bonnie lllig arc the owne'rs of thc Secondary Unit at this addrcss and ture appticd
for and bccn granted a variance to do an addition to the Secondarv Unit which will oncmach inio the
front rnd wes sidc sct backs.
We ssnt lett€rs to the PEC dated Fcbruary t2, 2000, and March lq 2m0, requestirrg thtt the
epplication for thc variance be postponod or withdrawn for the several retsons, inoludiq, th€ fact
that despite our rcpeated rqlucrts and offers of mccting dates and timeq the Applicants chor uot
to meot with us and that I could not be present ar the hearing scheduled for March 13, 2000, due to
a long standing oul-of-town cornnritment ud requested thal the hcariug be postpon€d for two weeks
to cnrblc me to bc prcsclrt to addrecs the issues in person. Notwithstanding our rcquc$tq the PEC
rulcd on urd granted the variancc applied for.
we s€nl noticc on March 17, 2(X)0, and on March z3.zC/|/|, rcquesting an appeal to the Town
Council of the granting of this variance- On March 28, 2000, you forwaraeA !o us the cncloscd
Appeals Forms which wc heve now had rn opportunity to filt out rnd rcturn with this tetter.
Pursuant to Clause H of thc Appeats Form. wc are zubmitting this letter to idemi$ the i$u€s on
P.09
Mar-30-oo 04:35P NL Investmctnts, Inc.
apPeal- There arc thrae aspects ofthc vrriance applicd for which we witl address: the front cotry
encrqschtnsnt into the front sctbaclg the extcnsion ofthe second floor declc to wrap around thc fiom
ofthe Secundary Unit which ensroaphcs into the front and wast side setbacks: and thc construction
ofa trash enclosure into the west sido setback.
fitlc lcruct
First and foremo$t, w€ must identiS the legal titlc issue in this application. Titte ro propcrty urtside
offour walls of cach unit is titlal jointly to both the Primary ud Socondrry Unit owDcrs. The land
aFectcd by the variance applicetion is outside of the four walls of the Sccondary Unit and, as rucft,
is jointly owrral propcrty. fu the joint owners of an undivided onehalf intefiest in this rcal cstate, wo
do not support this application and request that it be denisd.
Entrywry Erpenriort into Front Sctbrct
With respect to the entry area expansion sought to be eocroachcd into the front setback, wc object
on the brsis that there is no ncccssity nor hardship argumat to justi$ the granting of a vrriance fir
this aspect of the Secondary Unit owners' design. Thc existing €otry arca is comparable in size crd
$prce ss otists wifh thc Primary Unit-which mcans thse is ample space for sevenl peoplc to cntel
tbe unit, talc offtheir coals, hang up thcir coats on coat hookdracks, have a berrch for ritting on arrd
to othcrwise rccomplish thc rcasorsble purgres of an antryway.
For design rcarorx we object to thc cxpansion of the cotryway into thc front setback. Thc
fundamgnal deeigt of this Prirnrry-Secondary property is to provide $paration of space and privacy
betwccrr the units by building the Primary Unit closcr toward the strect and setting the Sccondary
Unit bad further towrrd the hillside. Separation of spacc. prirncy trctwcen the urdts and
identificai<x ofthe separate units is achieved thruugh this stepping back ofthe propenies. To altow
the Secondary tlnit to expand its €ntryway into the front *tback defeats this fundamentd dcsigll
fcatwe in an unnccesstrJ, and undesirablc way md must be objected to.
In"ry""h as thc Applicant carlnot establish a harrdship nor neccssity to jusri$ thc granting of a
variance to cxpard the entrywry hto tlre frort setbaclq this portion ofthe variancc spplication must
be dcnicd.
Sccond Floor Dcck Erprurion into Sctbtcln
When we sought approvr,l to remodel the Primary Unit in 1998, wc sought to extend our second floor
dcck around ths front ofthc unit to the ea$. '[hc o$.ner$ ofthc Secondary Unit objecrcd rc this
portion ofour project bccsuse ofthe encroachsrent into the front setbactc In rcsponse lo thcir
objections cnd the PEC's epparent support of thair objection, we withdrcw this aspcct frorn our
rpplicrtion. For thc ssrrte rcasqng ac we w€rc doried the opportunity to ortcnd our second floor deck
.horn the front of our unit to the sidc ofour unig wc objecr to thcir request to do rhc samc work to
thcir unit' The granting of a variance lo enablc thern ro procced wirl this aspecr of thcir projd
P. 10
Ma|'.-3O-OO 04:35P Nl Investm€nts, Inc-
wu'rld amount to lhe granting ofa spccial privilry whcrc no hardstrip nor necessity is cstabtished.
Trarh Endcurr in SctbecL
Ite Applicant seehs to aonstruct I tnsh encloeure in the side sstback of thc unil. Whilc we
appreciatc the ralra ofa tnrsh enclosure and would agree to thc constructaon ofa trash enclosurc that
is reasonablc in size, we cumot agree to thc encloqre proposcd by the Applioant. The Fasl
eaclosure variarrce applied for is excessivc in scope arrd beyod whar ir reasonably necessary for lhe
limited ptrposca of r trash eflclocure. As proposcd it ig lbr morc spacious rhan is rcasonabty
nece$nDf for the limited prrposes of storing trash cans and rccycling tftu and is significantly largcr
than the trash cnclosurcs that have bccn pcrmined to bc installed by the other propcrties in ihc
neighborhood, 1'he granting ofthis aspect ofthe variance smounts to a spccial privilege whcn no
lurdship nor necessity can bc cstablislred.
Conclurion
Wc appeal fte granting of tbe rariance applicd for by the owners of thc Socondary Unit and requcst
ther the Town Council r€versc this sction ficr the fullowing reasons:
I . The joint owners of the lrnd upon which lhe vtiancc is rought do nor srppon or rgree
with the rcqu$ted variancc;
2. The Applicant failcd to establish arqr nccessity to justiffthc grurting <fany rspect ofthese
variances;
3. TheAppllantcsnnot esbblishany hardslriptojusti$thegrurtingofanyrspectofttrsr
variances: and
4. Thc granting of a variancc to ext€rd thc second lloor deck elong lhe setback amourrs to
the grutittg of a special privilege since tbc Primary Unit was recently dcnicd their rcqucrt to
do comparablc wo* ro the Primary Unir.
Acoordingly, we lcquest thc granting ofthc rariarce applied for by the owners of the Sccond61'y Unit
be rcvcrsed oa appcal.
Respectfu lly submitted,
NSA Invcstmcntq lrrc.
.l
'-.'/n .\/ ." ")- /'l. ti ti t L t. YI r( r'(, t s.,/ 7, ..,r,.(( N-
.it
By: Nancy SlhaarD, Pr€sident
P-l1
Design Review Actio.! Form-TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: trlig Residence Project Number: Prj00-0042
Project Description: Addition of exterior door
owner, Address, and Phone:
fllfit$"9"".e circle
Lelwood, KS 662f f
913-491-1668
Architect/Contact, Address, and Phone: i$*:"rtl;
Avon, CO 81620
970'926'5299
Project Street Address: 706 W' Forest Rd
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block l, Vail Village 6th
Parcel Number: 2lDl072ll022 BuildingName:
Comments: Interior remodel has no elfect on GRFA
Board/Staff Action
Action:staff aPProved with
conditionsMotion by:
Seconded bY:
Vote:
Conditions:Material to mltch existing
Town Planner: Allison Ochs
Date: March 3l' 2000
Project Name: trlig Residence
Documentl
DRB Fee Paid:
Beth Levine, Architect
P.O. Box 1825
Avon, CO.81620
(970) 926-509 (Phone)
(970)926-2993 (Fax)
Hand Delivery
April4,2000
To: T.O.V.
Allison Och
From: Beth Levine, Architects
Beth Levine
RE: 706 West, Forest Road
Vail. CO 81657
CliffIllig, Owner
Secondary Unit
The proposed remodel for the west (secondary) unit at 706 Forest Road has been
designed to complement and complete the east unit's remodel whiclr, was done in 1998.
The extensive east rernodel left the overall design ofthe two halves disproportionate and
extensively inconsistent. Although Cliffwas not involved in the 1998 Remodel, Cliff
feels a responsibility to restore the balance ofthe design for his remodel. The proposed
remodel would match the proportions, expansive dormers, trash enclosure, color and
railing ofthe east halfto once again create a unified overall design.
The original design intent of the two sides of the 706 Forest Road duplex was to provide
a primary east unit and a secondary west unit with a solid party wall, building setbacks,
and defined view directions. Thus, the original design did not have any windows in the
party wall; and the east unit's view directions were nortlq east, & soutlr; while the west
unit's view directions were north west & south-
The proposed remodel for the secondary unit bas been designed with the original duplex
design intent for design, proportion, light, air, privacy and view. The 1998 remodel of
the primary unit did not respect the original design intent with the resulting proportions
and the addition ofthe west frcing windows. At a substantial proposed investment by
Cliff, the proposed remodel for the west unit reunites the design with similar dormers,
railings, stone, siding and color.
The secondary unit has been trying to coordinate tlre design with the primary unit for
more thantwo months while also following the TOV design process. Nancy's architect,
Fritzland, Pierce & Smith were first contacted on February 2,2000. Nancy left Beth
Levine a message at that time indicating that she would be unable to meet the month of
February. Tlre secondary unit's owner volunteered to postpone the PEC February 28s
meeting until the March 13fr meeting at the request of ttre primary unit's owner, Nancy
Adam. On March 1, the proposed remodel was a unanimously given DRB conceptual
review approval with the staffallowed to provide the final approval. On March 136, the
PEC gave the requested variances unanimous approval. It was at the PEC rneeting that
Nancy's representative first pmvided the secondary unit a list of objection written to the
TOV, and the PEC upheld the unanimous approval. The TOV staffthen provided the
proposed remodel the staffDRB approval. Nancy has since appealed both the PEC and
DRB approvals and has provided more design objections. The secondary unit has
provided the primary unit drawings and opportrmities for meetings. The resulting 1998
primary rernodel, which left the project in such disproportion, also reveals the lack of
cooperation the primary unit has for the overall project. The unanimous support to the
TOV DRB, PEC, and Community Development staffofthe secondary unit's design is in
sharp contrast the extensive list of detail criticisms as offered by the primary unit.
Although the 3-23-W NSA letter to the PEC was not addressed to the secondary unit, the
design considerations are as follows:l. The separation of space and privacy are maintained at both units' entry by the primary
unit's entry dormer whic[ was expanded in the 1998 remodel. The
enclosure./expansion ofspace occurred under an existing deck for the secondary unit,
thus using the secondary unit's originally designed space.
2. The trash enclosure has been designed to bahnce the primary unit's 1998 design by
creating an opportunity to carry the common stone around the building: in addition to
providing trash enclosure space.
3. The front dormer and chimney expansion have been added to the secondary unit to
balance the primary unit's 1998 expansion. The original design intent of the duplex
was for a complete party wall separation without any windows on the party wall
plane. The 1998 primary expansion violated the originally intended privacn air,
light, ventilation and views by adding west facing windows. The primary unit's view
windows all face nortb east and soutlr" Ttre west window in question for the primary
unit is a srnall 3'x4'window at the top of a stair landing. Whictt, does not appear to be
a view window and any views from this window are blocked by the secondary unit's
chimney (as is seen in the primary unit's elevation drawing).
4. The southeast bedroom dormer has been designed consistent with the original 1980
building designed set back between the two units.
5. The southwest bedroom dormer was acceptable to the owner of the primary unit.
6. Placement of Railing and Siding was acceptable to the owner of the primary unit.
7. West wall windows and door were acceptable to tlre owner of the primary unit.
8. Additional Matters: Nancy first dimgreed with the deck expansion on the northwest
corner in a meetrng between Nancy and myself on 3-28-00. The deck expansion has
been designed to balance the architecture.
9. Condition Precedent to Any Consent: The outstanding legal issues involve the
previous owner ofthe secondary unit.
The intent once again for the remodel of the secondary unit at 706 Forest Road is to
complement and complete the east rurit's 1998 remodel. The only way to accomplish this
goal is to completely rebuild the exterior ofthe secondary unit, at great expense. The
TOV unanimous DRB and PEC approvals, more than support the strength and
application ofthe design intent. CliffIllig is a resident ofKansas, and was able to attend
the March l3d'PEC meetmg. However, the owner of the primary unit did not attend"
althougb, the meeting was postponed from February 28b to March l3o at her request.
The applicant respectfully asks the Town Courrcil and TOV board members and staffto
uphold the DRB and PEC approvals and allows the secondary units the opportunity to fix
a Forest Road eyesore.
Please forward a copy of this letter and the included picture to all Town Council
members and applicable board and staffmembers.
Inclusive pictures:
706 Forest Road 1980 design building elevations - two sheets
1998 Primary unit's remodel - color rendition
1998 Primary unit's remodel west elevation
Proposed Secondary unit's remodel illustration sketched on top ofthe 1998
Primary unit's color rendition
copy:
CliffIllig
Bruce Chapman
NSA Investments
Jim Powell
A4lAU2gga 11: 30
Bucc D- Chspnalr
976-926-
o
1135 BRI..CE D
BRUCE D. CHAPMAN
courSElIlRS ! ATNtRXsrS AT l,As, P.C.
Post Oflice Box 65OO
Veil, Co 61658
CI{APMAN
o
PAGE A2
Of Couurcl
UryIsm
Dwirl F. Rock
{Admittcd i!, Cold.ado
adOrr6le)
Apdl4,2000
via facsimilc 479'2452
Allison Ochs, Planner II
Depanment of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: 706 West Forest Road
Our File No. 28361
Dear Ms. Ochs:
The pu4pose of this letter is to rcsPond to the inaccuracics set forth in
the letter frorn-NSA Investmenrs, Inc.,("NSA'1 dated March 23, 2000. Nanq'
Adam is president of NSA and she lives in Greenwood village, colorado which
is a suburb of Denver. N*.y Adarn and NsA have failed to panicipate in the
Town of vail's review p.o..r, of cliff lllig's application. To the octent Nanqy
Adam and NSA feel that they have not provided inPut to the process it is theil
own fault. Despitc thc allegaiions of Nanry 66em and NSA that they have not
been able to piovide inpui, you and Beth Levine, Cliff's ardritect, havc been
constantly .*it.Ut. to *..i with thern personally to discuss their concerns'
They have had ample opPortunity to discuss the applicatiol *it Cliff IUig i1
p.r*n or by telephon..- bespite iontinuances to accommodate Na.ry Adam's
i.h.aU. to aUo; her to attind hearings, Nanqy Adam has failed to attended
any or the public meerings in regard to the application, Not having
panicipatea "rd t ot liking tie result, ihe has now appcaled the matter to the
Vail Town Council,
cliff's archirect, Berh Levine, first discussed the proiect with Nancy
Adam on February 9, 2000 and inquired how she could prwide her with
copies of the drawings for the proiect. On February I l, 2000, Beth forwarded
to Nanry Adam cop-ies of the-proiect drawingp by E9{Ex t'rioritl o,et"ight
along with her lettei stating tn"i Ciiff netded io stan his constructron early in
the ieason because of thc li:nited availability of contractors and to avoid the
prolect dragging on all sunrmer. Beth stated that cliff would need to start
D:\WPDOC]8[ALRESV836 I lctrct 4-l!0 do<
PHoNE:19701926'lro0'FAx:19701926-r136'E'UAlLbdo@vrill"'con
g4lB4lza6A 11:34 97fJ-926-o
1136 BRI.JCE D CHAPMAT.Io
PAGE 63
-2-March 25,2000
constfuction by March 15, 2000 and would nced the consent of Nancy Adam
by that date. Beth invited Nancy to contact her if she had any questions
;g;di"f ahe proiect. Nanry Adam responded that shc would not be available
todeal with thc matter until March.
Inanefforttobeopenandcooperative,BethLcvinealsoinformed
Nancy Adam of Cliff 's submittal m the bown of Vail seeking appro'al of the
,.*oi.t. Thus, cliff caused Nanry Adam and NSA to be aware tlat the
applic"tior, was pending even bcfoie they received notice from the Town of
Vail. Their decision not"to panicipate in th. pto..ss is their responsibility and
not the Town of Vail's or Cliff lllig's-
As indicated in the Ietter dared February 12, 2000 from NSA to the
Planning and Environmental comnrission ("PEc"), this matter was sdrcduled
to be coruidered at its February 28, 2QOO me€ting' In Nl{-s- letter to Beth
Levine dated February 18, 20'00, NSA requested thT- Slff-Postpone -the
hearing before the PEC scheduled for February 18, 2.000: cliff agreed to
portpol.,.a the PEC hearing untjl March 13, 2000, Despite the_postponement
bf tfre nearing, neither Nairy Adam or anyol-re else on behalf of NSA met with
cirher Beth 6r Cfiff prior io the Marclr, 13, 2000 PEC mecting to prwidc
input as to any .or,..ir,, they rniglrt h19 ryth the proposed -dt1tg"' Beth has
been available to meet continuouiy and Cliff Illig was at the duple"r in Vail the
wcck of March LZ, 2OOO and left ieveral telephone rnessages for,Nanry Adam
in an attempt to errange a mecting. Nanry Adam did nor meet with Cliff while
he was in Vail during ihe week oi March 12, 2000. Beth suggcsted to Nancy-
Adam in her fax to illSA on March 3, 2000, that Nancy try to conuact Cliff
iifig airectty at his home phone nu'rbcr which was provided_ in the fax' If
Niry Adam or NSA weri really interested in discussing and resolving any
issues, one would thirik they would have called cliff Illig to discuss any
conceff$ regarding the proiect with him.
The first indication of any conc€rns thac Nancy Aaam o1 flA had \'Yith
the application came in the fori* of a letter addressed to the PEC which was
distributed at thc PEC hearing on Marctr 13, 2000 and was not received by the
Community Development srJf in tirne to be included in the Commissioners'
packet. NSA did noi provide Cliff lllig or Beth Le'ine with a coPy of th€ Ietter
and tney did not have an opponunity to see the letter until the hcaring on
March 13, 2000. Despite the ia.1 that the PEC hearing had been delayed from
February 28,2QOO at^the rcquest of Nanry Adam, sne oio not attend the PEc
hearing,on March 13, 2000- Lynn Fritzlen, NSAs architect, did attend the
herrini and discussed NSAs oblections to the application. Since NSAs letter
w:rs not included in the Comnriisioners' packet, the meeting was adiourned to
D:\WpDOC\RE LRESU696 l htut 'a'340.do(
64lE4l2ZAA 11:36 76-926-o 1135 BRI.EE D CHAPI|hN PC
o
PAGE A4
March 25,2000-3-
give the commissioners time to rerriew the letter. The PEc reconvened end
ipproved the application unanirnously.
Nancy Adam and NSA complain that the DRB approralllas gtu1 -by
staff and implied that the DRB dia not review the application. The DRB did
,review the application and directed that the final review and apprortal would be
by staff
Nancy Adam and NSA complain- that they were- not provided
construction drawings until after steff DRB approval' O^ yTth., 17 ' 20OO'
Beth forwarded to NSA a set of pre-corutruction atawings by FedEx Priority
Overnigirt to NSA. Orr February i r, ZOOO,-geth had previously sent a set of
ar"**in[ Uy FedEx Priority O".inight to NSA' The drawings sent on March
17, 2060, were pre-constiuction diawings and the only architectural drangc_s
from those furnished on February lI,2-000, were the rvrdming of the south
dormers from i0' lo I2', eliminaiion of the proposed new dccks on the south
side, adding stonc on the trash enclosure ana aaaing snow melt on tl.e decls'
These are not significant architectural differences'
NanqyAdamandNSAinsistonatuibuti'utoCliffllligt}redisputesshe
had with the former owne(sr Mike and Karen Herman. on several occASiOnS
Nancy Adam has stated that she will not consent to cliff's proposed rcmodel
until unrelated issues that they claim to have with the Hermans have been
resolved to her satisfecion. fhe issues betwccn thc Hermans and Nancy
Adam, including any claims for restitution, were setded approximatdy " *9ryh
ago and the lailsuit that had been pending between N"nry Adam and t-Le
Hermans has been dismisscd.
Nancy Adam and NSA have atleged that theft is a title issue which
should have precluded the PEC from granting th9 valancg requested' The
party wall "gieem.nt
regarding the propeny provides t*.d: common area
associated wi-th each hali of tni aupiex is to be used exclusively by the owner
of that half of the duplor despitc *re f"a that it is common area' When Nancy
Adam made her app'lication in regard to her remodel, she made this cxact
aryument to justify'her construction and rcquest for a variance in the common
area. Now she attemPts to argue fractly rhi opposite position to opposc Cliff
Illig's application.
Nancy Adam and NsA have allegpd that the application should not
have been approved becsuse NsA has not consented to the remodcl Pu$ullt
to the p"ny-at declaration, cliff Illig feels that NSA has been unreasonable
in its refusal to provide that conseit' In any went' the Town of Vail's
DWVPDOC\REALRESVSSoI l.tet t-3{0.ds
0418412466 11:34 7A-926-
o
1135 BRTJCE D CI+FI{AN PC
o
PAGE 05
-4-March 25,2OO0
consistent position has been that it will not interiect itsdf in disputes
concerning private covenants Such as party wall agreements'
N*.y Adam and NSA allegc that the prior ovrners: y!"-itd K*
Herman, desired to remodel the pioperty in a manner that is ardritecturdly
;i^ii"t to Cliff's proposal bur reaiized that sucS architcctural style would not
b" .ompauulc wiih tr,. prop.rt1, As the Hermans' attorney I can tell yorl the
reason the Hcrmans "Ua|Aor-,.i
the remodel was not because they thougltt it
wiN not compatible with the PrcPerty, but because they {eciae{ after a year
that they *o.,ta never be able io riach an agreement with Nancy Adam'
Nancy Adam and NSA allegc that thcy had propgsed at least j differerrt
meeting ti#s but Beth Lcvine ch-ose to leave town without responding' Again
this is not uue as you can se€ from tlte cnclosed fa:r. In the enclosed fax, Beth
asltc Nanry Adam to confirm that I;00 p,rn' is- acceptable and *lt -n" will be
goi,.go.,.,oftownfrornMarch20-24forafamilyvacation.Bcthmetwith
NancyAaam on March 27'h'
It is my understanding that NSA hasrecently hired-a 19w lttomey.a$
requested .r.o^
jt ttre "ppe t""th; V"it tottt Council schedr-rled for April I 16 be
poitponea. This ls'merely another attemPt to delay this proiect and the
i.qnitt for the continuance should not be granted'
Nancy Adam and NSA have ttpeT:dly referred to ttyl*t as tlre
owner of the "Itimaqf Unit" and ttrat itiff IUig is the own:r of the "Secondary
Uoif, primary and 6econdary do not imply iuperior *d inferior but merely
the relative ,quar" footage albwed for eaih unit. The basis for the obiections
that NsA has made at this late date is not clear but the thrust is that if oiff
ntig it allowed to renrodel his half of the duplci tt
"-pP:oTd
by the PEC and
DiB, it might look as nice as her half of the duplex which she. reTd' Rnished
**oa.[tglNancy Adam and NSA have had their opPoftunity for input into
the applidtior, dnie* and approval p-r9!ess, their substantial input has been
.o*ilirea, and botJr the DdB'ana fbC have approved t5c application' There
is no basis for overturning their decisions'
cc: Nancy Adam and NSA lnvestments, Inc'
D:\WPDOC\!ALn!5V83O l t.tt t 4-t-00 doc
04164/29A6 11:30 976-926-Lr36
Mar-I7-oo 04:laP rrf cuntr
BRIJCE D Cl{AFltlA},| PC
ck. Rd. Flosan e I 926-2993
PAGE 06
F. ()2
BETH LEVII.I& ARCHITECT
P.o. 1825
Avon, CO 81620
(s7 o\ 926-5 0ee(P) (e 70 ) e2G2ee3 (F)
TRA}.ISMNTAL
3-17{0
TO: NSA lnvcstments, [nc
49738. Freserve CT
Greenwood Village CO 80 t2l
303-770-0779
Fax ?70-8918
FROM: BETH LEVINE ARCHITECT
RE: 706 ForertRoad
Vail, CO 81657
INCLUSIVE:
OnesetofPro4orrtnrctionfhawin&cfolthgwostunitof?06Fore'rt
Road"
Sheets: C,ln'717
NOTE:
Enclos€d arc the Prc4orstnrctionDrawingr fol thc westrnit of 706
Forcst Road. The "*rritect,,ur
changgs from thc provioS dralvyrus irrclude:
wideningthe rouf, aorme"s ftom f O6" to l2'0rr' climination of.the decks on
tir" *"fiaorra*, "aii.,g,t"* on thc bosh enclosurs, and adding snorv
rnolt on the deoks-
Themodificationofthewestunithngbeendesignedtggompleteand
complimcnt the east *rit* ,""roocl. Tho intent is to rnatch all the details on
the esst unit
As You may kmw, tlrc intcriorrernodet 5 Pft:tnJlurde^rwaY' We
hgvenowh8dtheopponunitytorevicwyorrrdcieiledcommcntslnyour
64/a4l2AOA 11:36 978-925-1135 BRLICE D CHAF}4AN PC
rrrar-l7-oo tl4:18P rJ .rune ck- Rd- Ftosen 9O-e26-2993
PACE A7
P. 03
m€mo to the PEC. We ars arxiotts to digcuss thc cmedor modificgtion 80
thoi *o o4n minimiz€ the druation of tbe constnrction dilruptio-n at thc site'
I understand that you hsd tho opporhtnity to talk to ClifrIlliS today. I
also understand that you would like to mect on Matoh 2f . I would bs
"n"inUft
in the aftemm4 preftrably at l;00p'm' Please fax me back a
r*i"."tio" ofthe rneeting. Ci"uoouf collsfiUction schedrrlc, please frit a
copy of pur conconn to Cliff and rnyself prior to the nrcting
piease provide mc with copies ofthe details and spec^ifcations so can
rrntch your rid" f-, miling dotails and wood typc on thc railinp' rd siding
rmterisl and stain color.
I will bo on a femily vaoation ft'om March 2U24'
Copy: Cliff ltlig, Bnrce Chapmaq and Jim Powcll