HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 7 TRACT B GOLDEN PEAK BASE 1995-1996 APPROVALS 2 OF 2 LEGALVA^lVJIyFry-tbJR x.A.d,F*[B* \q15 1116 W.
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Proiect Name: Golden Peak Ski Base Project Number: nla'
Project Description: Installation of magic carpet ski lift, relocation of mechanical shed, and
installation of summer stream crossing at the base of chair 12.
Owner, Address, and Phone: Vail Resorts, Inc.
PO Box 7, Vail, CO 81658
479-4008
ArchitecVContact, Address, and Phone: Jeff Babb
same
same as above
Project Street Address: 458 Vail Valley Drive
Legal Description: Tract F and B, Vail Village 7th and 5th filings
Parcel Number: 210f08109004
Comments:
Building Name: Golden Peak
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Town Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Date: 10126199
Project Name: Golden Peak Ski Base
Board/Staff Action
Action:StaffApproved
DRB Fee Paid: 20.00
Department of Community D evelopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8
FAX 970-479-2452
Ocrober 26, 1999
Jeff Babb
Vail Associates
PO Box 7
Vail, CO 81658
And
Adjacent property owners
Re: Minor Amendment to Golden Peak Development Plan to install a magic carpet ski lift,
relocate the mechanical shed, and install a seasonal summer stream crossing for vehicular
access to the base of Chair l2:Tract B and F. Vail Villaoe 5'n.
Dear Jeff:
Based on the findings contained in this letter, the above reterenced amendments to the
development plan have been approved by staff.
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST AND BACKGHOUND
The request is for a minor amendment to the Golden Peak development plan to allow for the
installation of a magic carpet ski lift, relocalion of the mechanical shed and the seasonal
installation of a stream crossing to access the base of chair 12.
II. CRITEFIA AND FINDINGS
A. Section 12-8D-OD: Amendments to the approved development plan will be
considered in accordance with the provisions ol Section 12-9A-10 of this
Tiile.
Section 12-9A-l0 is addressed below.
B. Section 12-9A-2: Minor Amendment (staff review): Modifications to site
plans that do not alter the basic inlent and character of the approved district
and are consistent with the design criteria of this Chapter, may include
changes to landscape or site plans that do not adversely impact pedestrian
{p *uno'o 'n""*
or vehicular circulation.
The approved Golden Peak development plan includes the Golden Peak
buildings, parking and ski runs. The proposed improvements would not affect
these elements of the plan. The proposed improvements will not alter the basic
intent or character of the ski runs. The proposed improvemenls are in keeping
with and would be incidental to the ski runs and adjacent properties.
C. Section 12-9A.10: Minor moditications consistent with the design criteria
outlined in subsection 12-9A-2 may be approved by the Departmenl ot
Community Development. Notification of a proposed minor amendment and
a report of stalf action shall be provided to all property owners within or
adiacent to the district that may be atfected by the amendment. Notification
shatl be postmarked no later than 5 days following staff action on the
amendment and shall include a brief statemenl describing the amendmenl
and the time and date of when the Planning and Environmental Commission
will be informed of lhe stalf decision-
As noted above, staff believes the amendment is consistent with the design
criteria under subsection 12-9A-2. Notification of the proposal was provided to all
adjacent property owners on October 26, 1999. This approval will be reported to
the Planning and Environmental Commission on November 8, 1999.
You should be aware that this approval could be called up for review by the Planning &
Environmental Commission.
Please also note that the realignment of Chair 12 and the proposed footprint for the Race City
building were approved as part of the original development plan for Golden peak.
lf you have any questions, contact me aI 479-2148.
Domin F. Mauriello, AICP
PlanningChief of
FIEVEFYONE\PEC\MEMOS\9g\GOLD.PK2
oo
,l\,r*
EXISTING
PAD
ocT-25-99 t 1 ,49
TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEE
E Ncw Consrucdon - Sll00
El Addi.ion' $50
trConccptudRcviow- S0
Construction ofa ncw building;
Includcs any addirion whcrc squarc footage is addcd to any rcsidcntid or
comnrcrcial building
Inctudcs minor ctungcs to buildhgs and ritc irnpmvomcnq such aS'
rcrooting painting, window additions, landsoaping, fcnces and rt*aining
walls, ctc.
For any applicatim whcrrc tbc appticrnt wisbe to mcct wittr Dcrign Rwicw
eoaraio i;tffnine wbahcr ornc thc pnojoct gencdly complics wi$ the
desig gridclincs Thc DRB docs not vots m conccptual rwiora
FRol{ ' ToV-CO}l\o -DEV-DEPT.lDtS?84732(|52 PAGE 2/IO
Qucstions? Calc ntrnning Staff rt 47g'2l2tl
WWNOFVAIL
APPLTCATION FOR DESTCN REVIEW APPROYAL
CENERAL INEORMATION
Thls applcado i. for any projod roquiring Dcsign Rcviw approval- Aly projoct rcqririlg desiln revicn'ntust
racci'c OoSgr eerric*' epjroval ptiri o srUminlng for a buiiding pcrmit, Fa sfr,scific infiormation' ecc thc submittal
."quircmartifor thc partiorlar approval rh,at is roqucstc,C. ttrc applisation cmnot bc acccptcd until dl thc roquircd
jnfLnration h srbmiicA fft" pid;ect may also ncod b bo rcviwcd by thc Town Grucil and/or the Planning and
Environmcnal Commirsion. licsigp neview Boerd rpprovd crpir6 onc ycer lfter fiud eppmvd unlcsf r
building pcrmit is trcucd rnd conctrucdon is dartcd.
B.
c-
E"
F.
G,
H.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:LOT: BLOCK: FILINGT
PHYSICAI. ADDRESS:
pApaCEL#t 7b i bY / nqM( (Cortarr Bagle Co. Asscsson O'ffica"at 970'328't6,40 for parccl #)
ZQNING:
PHONE:
owNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
NAME OF APPLICANT;
^-{iMAILING
PHONE:
'5
&<-
F@inorAttcration- $20
DRB foss ars to be rnid a the time of $bmittal. Latc, whor apPlyisg for a buikling pctmit, plcasc idstdry
rho rocqratc va;rration of t1c pojccL Thc Town of Vail wifl adjrst the foc according to thc projccr valu*ioo'
PLEASE SUBMIT TT{IS APPLICATION, AIJ, SUBMITTAT REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO TTIE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMI NITy DEVEITPMENT,75 SOUTH FRONTAGE R'OAD'
DESCRTPTION OF THE REQUESTT
vAtL,coLoRADO t1657.
COMMISSION APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring approval by thc Planning and Environmcntal Commission. For spccific
information, scc the submittal requirements for thc particular approval that is rcqucstcd. Thc application can not bc
accepted urtil all rcquired information is submittcd. Thc projcct may also necd to bc revicwed by thc Town Council
and/or thc Dcsign Rcvicw Board.
A: TYPE OF APPLICATION:
tr Additional CRFA (250)
tr Bcd and Brcaldast
tr Conditional Use Permit
tr Major or E Minor Subdivisiontr Rezoning
tr Sign Variancc
tr Variancc
tr Zoning Code Amcndment
B. DESCRIPTIONOFTHEREQUEST:
O
Qucsio$ Call thc Planning Staff at 479.21 38
APPLICATION FOR PI,ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
tr Amcndmcnt to an Approved Developmcnt Plan
tr Employee Housing Unit (Typc: _)tr Major or tr Minor CCI Extcrior Alteration
(VailVillage)
El Major or E Minor CCll Extcrior Alteration
(Lionshead)
tr Special Development Districttr Major orftMinor Amcndmcnt to an SDF,- SV bqe.Oe^
TOWN OF VAIL
c.
D.
MAILING ADD
H.
c.
F.OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
UeC"-NAME OF REPRESENTATTVE:
MAILINOADDRESS:ale.n>
PHONE:_
FEE - SEE THE STJBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
SUBTVTIT THISAPPLICATION,ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TOTHE
DEPARTMENT oF COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 soUTH FRONTAGE ROAD.
ate e0elVp;*o*,
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
PEC McctingDut"r l)z),f, f,.,
SEP 1 5 1999
APPLICATION FOR AN AMM{DMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY
A,PPROVEI' DEVELOPMENT PLAN
GENERAL INFORMATION
Use this applicdion for any modification(s) to a previously approved development plan. In additiur to this
application, approval by the Town Council and/or the Desigr Rwion Board may be requircd"
I. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE
A pre-ryplication conference with a planning staffmember is strongly encorraged. No application
can be accepted unless it is complcte. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appoinEn€ot
with the staffto determine additional submittal requiremots.
II. ST]BMITTAL REOUIREMENTS
The following information shall be required with this zubmital:
O FEE: $250.00. The fee must be paid at the time of submittal.
B Stamped, addressed eirvelopes and a list oftle names ard mailing addresses of all properly owncrs
adjacent to the subject property, including properties behind and across streets. The applicant is
responsible for correct names and mailing addresses. This information is available from tbc Eagle
County Assessor's offi co.
tr One (l) set of plans of the approved dwelopment'
O Four (4) sets ofplans showing the proposed changes. All changes must be clearly indicated on the
plan.
O A written explanation ofthe proposed changes.
PLEASENOTE THAT ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS CAN BEACCEPTED. ALL OF
THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MUSTBE SUBMITTED IN ORDER FORTHIS
APPLICATION TO BE DEEMED COMPLETE.
ilI. TIMEREOUIREMENTS
A. The Planning and Environmelrtal Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each
month. A compl€te 4plication form and all accompanying material (as described above)
- must be accepted by the Community Development Deparfnent by the appropriate submifial
date, which is a minirmrm of four (4) weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hcaring.
Incomplete applications (as detennined by the planning statr) will not be accepted-
B. The PEC ryproval shall lapse if construction is not commenced within one year of the date
of approval and diligently pursued to completion. or if thc use for which the appmval is
granted is not commenced within one year.
Page I of2
ry.ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES
e. tftnit upptication requires a separate review by any local, Statc orlederal agency other than
the Town of Vail, thi applicatibn fee shall be increased by S200'00' Examples of zuch
review, may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Departnrent of Highway Access
Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404' ctc.
B. The applicant sball be responsibte for paying any publishing fecs which are in exccss of
SOZ oitne apptication fee. If. at the applicanfs request, :my matter is poslponed for
hearing carsing the matter to be re-publishe4 the,n, the entire fee for such re-publication
shall be paid by the aPPlicanl
C. Applications deemed by the Community Development D€partment to have desigr, land use
- otho ioo.r *hich uray harre a significart impact on the comrrunity rmy rcquirc rwiew
by consultants in addition to Town staff. Should a determination be made by the Town staff
that an outside consrltant is needed, the Community Development Departnrcnt may hirc the
consultant. The Deparlrnent shall estimate the amount of money necessary to psy th€
consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time of
filing an 4plicdion. Expenses incured by the Tovm in excess of the amorrrt forwarded by
the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days ofnotification by the
Town. Any excess frrnds will be refrmed to the applicant upon rwiew completion.
Page2 of2
GOLDEN PEAK NARRATIYE NOTES
DATE: September 3,1999
General Statement: The proposed amendments or alterations to the approved
development plan do not : change usesl increase gross residential floor areal change
the number of dwelling unitsl or modify, enlarge, or expand any SDD. The
proposed modifications do not alter the basic intent or character ofthe Ski Base
Recreation District and are minor amendments for the purposes of Section l2-9A-10
and Title 12 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
1. Terminals, other than realignment and new foundation footprints, remain the same as
in the approved development plan.
2. T'lte Platter lift on West Golden Peak has been removed per the approved
development site plan.
3. New Magic Carpet for children located below tree island will be removed or covered
and blended to minimize slrmmer visual impacts. To be installed in the summer of
t999.
4. Beginners platform at Northwoods will have new handle tow replacing old children's
rope tow.
5. Bridge shown on site plan is summer temporary pending Town of Vail and other
approvals. The temporary bridge will be completely outside of the channel bed, not
impede stream flow, and will serve to permit closure or significantly reduce use of the
Chair #12 service road which allows for its revegetation and restoration.
6. The tent platform without the tent will remain for at least the 99-00 ski season
pending Golden Peak building use evaluation for events, team lunches, etc..
7. The race timing building footprint has been shown larger than currently exists to
accommodate a larger race facility. The new facility replacing the existing outdated
structures would consolidate timing, storage, team uses and similar functions into one
new building designed to be architecturally compatible with the Golden Peak Lodge
and the Children's Center.
Date Receive
sEP r 5 1999
o o
Town of Vail
.C91mu1 i! Devetopmenr Depr.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Pinos DelNorte
PO Box 69 / 600
Vaif, CO 81652
Condominium Association
Vail Valley Drive
Town of Vail
Community Development DePt.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. CO 81657
' ,...*'l:""*'t
Ram's Hom Lodge Condominium Association
416 VailValley Drive
Vail, CO 81657
oo o
820 Management Trust
Attention: Lee M. Bass, Trustee
201 Main Street
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Barbara M. Osbome
c/o Keith S. Jennings
Brown Brothers Haniman
1531 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
I
All Seasons Condominium Associatir
434 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Manor Vail Lodge Condominium Assc
595 Vail Valley Drive
Vail, CO 81657
o
oN
-aEssE
O:= al:t$xo>:
fiHS
oo oe
t-5o
oE,E+LO
H=R
EErERe
'iS.+ I
=o o<-J
Grand Prix, Inc.
386 Hanson Ranch Road
Vaif, CO 81657
Kay H. Chester
395 Mill Creek Circle
Vail, CO 81657
ILC Realty Ltd.
7979 Broadway, Suite 101
San Antonio, TX 78209
Elizabeth Ross Johnson Revor
c/o J. Epstein and Co., lnc.
Villard House
457 Madison Avenue
NewYork, NY 10022
lj-t
.eo^o)xfv
og
F;e
'fi -Alr G'6
sEe
E6 b<q
=588
Vail, CO 81657
Department of Community Deve Lopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
october 26. 1999
Jeff Babb
Vail Associates
PO Box 7
Vail, CO 81658
And
Adjacent property owners
Re: Minor Amendment to Golden Peak Development Plan to install a magic carpet ski lift,
relocate the mechanical shed, and install a seasonal summer stream crossing for vehicular
access to the base of Chair 12;Tract B and F, Vail Village 5'".
Dear Jeff:
Based on the findings contained in this letter, the above referenced amendments to the
development plan have been approved by staff.
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST AND BAGKGROUND
The request is for a minor amendment to the Golden Peak development plan to allow for the
installation of a magic carpet ski lift, relocation of the mechanical shed and the seasonal
installation of a stream crossino to access the base of chair 12.
II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Section 12-8D-6D: Amendments to the approved developmenl plan will be
considered in accordance wilh lhe provisions of Section 12-gA-10 of this
Tiile.
Section 12-9A-10 is addressed below.
B. Seclion 12-94-2: Minor Amendment (statt review): Modifications to site
plans that do not alter lhe basic intent and character of the approved district
and are consistent with the design criteria of this Chapter, may include
changes to landscape or site plans that do not adversely impact pedestrian
{g ror""ro r ""*
o oo
or vehicular circulation.
The approved Golden Peak development plan includes the Golden Peak
buildings, parking and ski runs. The proposed improvements would not affect
these elements of the plan. The proposed improvements will not alter the basic
intent or character of the ski runs. The proposed improvements are in keeping
with and would be incidenlal lo the ski runs and adjacent properties.
C. Section 12-9A-10: Minor moditications consistent wilh the design criteria
outlined in subsection 12-9A-2 may be approved by the Department ot
Community Development. Nolification of a proposed minor amendment and
a reporl of staft action shall be provided to all property owners within or
adiacent to the district that may be atlected by the amendment. Notification
shall be postmarked no later than 5 days tollowing stafl action on lhe
amendmenl and shall include a brief statement describing the amendment
and the time and date of when the Planning and Environmenlal Commission
will be inlormed of the stafi decision.
As noted above, staff believes the amendment is consistent with the design
criteria under subsection '12-94-2. Notification of the proposal was provided to all
adjacent property owners on October 26, 1999. This approval will be reported to
the Planning and Environmental Commission on November 8, 1999.
You should be aware that this approval could be called up lor review by the Planning &
Environmental Commission.
Pfease also note that the realignment of Chair 12 and the proposed footprint for the Race City
building were approved as part of the original development plan for Golden peak.
ll you have any questions, contact me at479-2148.
F\EVERYONE\PEC\I\,lEMOS\99\GOLD PK2
F. Mauriello. AICP
Chief ot Plannino
,[
lr,.*
.l
,) i,-'
)\
\ l/
I"\
I
4
il
Y.--
,;, ic
EXISTiNG
oAn
,--\(fl'
o
D esign Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Proiect Name: Golden Peak Ski Base
Project Description: Children's Lot Parking Control Gates
Owner, Address and Phone. Vail Associates, PO Box 7, Vail, CO 81658, Attn: Kirk Kelly
Architect/Contact. Address and Phone:
458 Vail Valley Drive
A portion of Tract F, Vail Village 5$ Filing
Buildins Name:
Project Street Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
Town Planner: Brent Wilson
Date: August 24, 1998
Board / Staff Action
Action: staff approved
F :r tIVIlRYONE\DRI ]t\PPROVAI-\9 ll\(iOLDPnAk. W PD
DRB Fee Pre-Paid: $20.00
I j' ' 'Qr..tio,rr0ll thc Pll;rn ing StatT rl'i 7i'l i 2 i't
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring Desigrr Rcvicrv approval. Any projcct rcquiring dcsign rcviov ntust
rcccivc Dcsign Rcviov approval prior to subnritting fora building pcrnrit. For spccific infornration, scc thc subrnittal
rcquircnrcnts for thc particular approval that i.s rcqucstcd. Thc application cannot bc acccptcd until all thc rcquircd
infornration is subnrittcd. Thc projcct nray also nccd to bc rcvicrvcd by thc Torvn Council and/orthc Planning and
Envirorrrncntal Corrrnrission. Dcsign Rcviov Board apploval cxpircs onc ycar aftcr final appt'oval unlcss a r
building pcrmit is issucd and conslruction is startcd.
DES RIPTION OF T E REQUEST:
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT:- BLOCK:- FILINC:
PEYSICAL ADDRESS: '"rr-4f-j161-.
revceta:ffi(ContactEaglcCo'Asscssorsofficcat970-328-8640forparccl#)'c.
D.
E,
F.
C.
ZONINC:
NAME oF oWNER(S): Vo-i\ Arso.
MAILINC ADDRESS:(65y
H.
PHoNE: |1.77- \oo't
owNER(S) STGNATURE(S) :
NAME OF APPLICANT:
MAILING ADDRESS:PO
PHONE:
TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEE:
E Ncrv Construction - 5200 Construction of a nerv building,
Includcs anyaddition rvhcrc squarc footagc is addcd to any rcsidcntial or
cornrncrcial building.
tr Addition -ss0
Odlino. Altcration -$20 Includcs nrinor changcs to buildings and sitc intprovcntcnts. such as,
. 1croofing. painting. rvindorv additions. landscaping. fcnccs and rctaining
walls, ctc.
DRBfccsarctobepaidatthctinrcofsubntittal. Latcr,rvhcnapplyingforabuildingpcnnit,plcascidcntify
thc accuratc valuation of thc projcct. Thc Torvn of Vaitrvill adjust the fcc accordrng to the projcct valuation.
PLEASE SUBMIT THTS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIRET\{ENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTTY DEVELOPIVIENT,75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD.
vAIL. COLORADO 816s7.
Aery'!s
TOlr/N OFVAIL
/'b/1.tv Dq .-'<f
I
BUILDING MATERIALS:
LTST OF PROPOSED MATERIALS
TYPE OF MATERIAL:COLOR:*
Roof
Siding
Othcr Wall Matcrials
Fascia
Sol'lits
Windows
Windorv Trinr
Doors
Door J'rinr
l{nnd or Dcck Rails
Flucs
Flashirrgs
Chimncys
Trash Enclosurcs
Grecnhouscs -
Rctaining Walls
Extcrior Lighting**
o*t*r ?r,^kt C-<}
* Please spccify the nranufacfurer's color, number and attach.a small color chip
**All cxtcriorlightingmustneettheTown'sLightingOrdinanccl8.54.050(J). Ifexteriorlightingisproposed,
plcasc indicate thc nunrbcr offixhrrcs and locations on a separatc lighting plan. Identi$ each fixture type and provide
the height above grade, lunrcns output. luminous area. and attach a cut sheet ofthe lighting fixtrues.
r\dtJa*
Updated 6/97
w
"OTlyN OFVAIL
a
a
cl
o
IvITNOR ALTBRATIONS TO TIIE.EXTEiIIOR OF BUILDINGS
AND SITE IMPROVDIIIINTS
CENERAL TNFORMATION
This application applies to changcs tnadc to a sile or exterior altcrations of a build.ing. Any altcration inrvhiclr additional building square footagc is addcd rvill rcquire an,.additions.'application.
I, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Photos or skctches rvhich Clgally convcy thc existing conditions.
Photos or skctches rvhich clcarly convey thc proposcd build.ing or sit e altcration(s).
All rclcvant specifications for the proposal includ-ing colors ancl lratcrials to be uscd.
Condonriniurrr Association approval (ifapplicablc). --
Ifthc intcnt ofthc proposal is no! clcarly indicatcd, thc Adnrinishator may dctcnninc that additional
lnatcrials arc ncccssary for thc rcvi*v of thc application.
V, STAFFAPPROVAL
The Adminisbator may revicrv and approve Design Rcview applications, approvc rvith certain modifications.
deny the application. or nray ret'er the application to thc Design Rcvierv Board for decision. All staff
approvals arc strbjcct to final approval by the DRB. Thc follorving types of Dcsign Rcvicl' applications may
be staff approved:
A. An1' application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent rvith rhe architc*ural dcsigrr.' Inatcrials and colors of the building. and approval has bccn rcceived by an aurhorized merriber ofa
condoniniurn associatiorr. i I appl icablc:
B. Anv application to nlodify an existing building that does not significantly changc the existing planes
of the building and is generally consistent with the architectural desigr, materials and colors oithe
building. inclLrding. btrt not lirnited to exterior build.ing finish materials (e.g. sronervork. siding. roof
tttaterials. paint or stain,). cxterior lighting. canopics or annings, fences. antennas. satellite dishes,
rvindorvs' skylights. siding. urinor cornnrcrcial facadc improvcrncnts, and othcr similar mod.it]cation s:
C. Anv application lbr site inrprovements or modifications iucluding. but not limitcd to. driveway
rnodifications. sitc grading. site rvalls. rcnroval or modifications to existing Inrdscaping, instailation
ol accessory structue.s or rccreational t'acilities,
'-<
-:=.=.*:===.--,1-.
&-+. JL t O GuU ?"rJ* AD"el-.^" c*,*L
?,,.^-.-q- + 0,tot -otA-3L --oo3
Vhi! v,Jl%D&S3o
h^rnV^[
\l,Jtt"0ED\
G* ) oL*^"l"J o
?"^"J- + Atot- o7)' o+'oo/
GM LJ'st R-*U C-*i-
\6ri Au"o
tacag Do.-k
?oqpod
o{ ff.t"
S"t"*._>
1...r*rf*r-
?*%
o
3
5
++€Cs
&4+5r Jd4+
o{,:, J 1flJ;31
ds 4
d6,a
s I 'v-r
3$d
llu V;tu.tefi/n1 {
6|tur1;Rtf Gntus
Pafticipants:
owNER 458 WD LLC 061221200s
4788 W COMMERCIAL BLVD
TAMAMC, FL 33319
APPLICANT NEDBOCONSTRUCTION 06122/2005 Phoner970-845-1001
P.O. BOX 3419
VAIL
co 81658
License: 251-A
Project Address: 458 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL LocaUoN: UNIT #4
L€gal Description: Lot: Block Subdivisaon: GOLDEN PEAK CONDOS
Parcel Number: 2101-082-7100-4
Comments:
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co,us
DRB Number: DR8050292
TOI4'NM
Project Name: Got/e.; ?Uk {1
Project Description: '15) uvD u3'
New fireplaces
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: DateofApproval:0612812005
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(P|AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this p$ect shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0007255
The applicant shall paint all vents, flues, and caps to match the adjacent walls.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $250.00
J\JN/20/240540N 04: I 8 PM
Jun.20.2005 2:34Pll
Descrlp0on ot tfie Requ€sG
,-ffi
General hfiDrmatlon!
All ptoiects rcquirln! deslgn rari€vv must recelve apprcrral prior F submt$ng a builcling permlt appll€tion. ptease
refcr F,Ure submiual requlremenb br the pardq,drr lpproval that b requested. nn aidrcaUon irji O*s" Rsvd;carylft be accepted unul Bll tequlE l lntbrnrauot ls received by tfte @mmunity Developmort Oeparrnenf Tte
proJect may also need b be reryiewEd Uy ilte Tom Cound and/or he plannini aM BMmnmenbt Commlsslon-D€elg.r tcvaew apprirvat tapsea unri a boatdrg ps.nn it iEued anrl cd|trn;tcHon oon||nen€ withanom year d the apprcyrl.
P.002
I{EDBO CONSTRUCII0I{ No,80i0 p . Z/z
lvlinor Exterlor Alterafi ons
Application for Daslgn Revlew
DaIErtfl ent of Communlty Delelopment
75 Sos$t Frontage Road, Vail, Colondo 8167
d: 90.rt79.2128 fax, 9P0,q79.24s2. web: r,ww.vall0c^r.com
a]4aL
Phyelcd Addrees:(),'7Vr'-
Patel lta,; Jlolof-ttt 9(t{(Conect eagh Co. Assessor it 97G3Zs-86.+0 for parcet no.)
Zoning:
NEme(E) cf Owner(s): 8J/l1O AG
ltlalllng Mdress:'4/>4de4e trl
uvner(s) Si gnature(c);
Nanre of Appllcant:
MailingMdressi &t 3//.?- ,/4/L t (o F,/..rr' Y
t-mailAddress:@axt-,,t3f-QQ ?.2
-
V I',fypa of Revlew and Fee:
^.
IrypcofReYlewandFee: ^iO Slgns $50 Pl$f$1.00 persquarefootoftotrl slgn area. L tD c-onceptual R*i€w No Fee V
E New furstnctioo f5S0 For onsrucdon ol a ncvrr buildlng or derp/rcbuild,tr Addftion $300 For an additlon where 3qu!e b6ee ir adfu to any resldenual or
\ , cormerdal hrilding (lndu.lg 250 lddluons & lflleriot @n/er,ggns).
I Minot Aleraton f250 Fsr minor dranges to br.dldlngs 8nd slte lrnpro€menB, sudl at' - (multl-Emlly/mmmerdal) reroofing, paindng, wlndow addltions, landscaping, fiencas and(multl-Famlly/mmm€rdal) reroofing, paintlng, wlndow addltions. hndscapr.ng, fiences .rO-O
Minor Alteration $20 FfHllltTS;rEto btrtHinss and dte loprornments, sudr as,lsnete-ramlly/duplcx) .eroottns, pBt-nurg wlnd& iogiuots,'lano.##fr:E& * nchansestoAppro€dpr.ng tzo ff'1ffi:t'.T'ans arready approv€d by p
separatlon Request * * *nn R.''leu' Board' 'lanning Sfeff or ne
Itr Separatlon Request
Ffffi?Y$?ig oea<no,:-49!G- sy, Mzd b a e,-rurL
Me6-nsDateT'ZO'OS
tL-
,, . JUN, I3.?AA5 9:31Rf4
Att: Town Of Vail
GOLD PK HOME OI,.]N 37@4798434 N0.580 P.1
c o LD E N i?* AI:,i ?,nf*o''*, u"
This letter is to clari8/ that the Golden peak Condomiriium Association is
aware of and approves the pending project involving David schack,s
penthouse # 4. Please issue any permits needed to move forward with rhis
qroject' Thank you Golden Peak condominium Associarion Manager,
Carrie Delain,
-1-\"."-^-|1, .dtu r
c.t\(- r\ n^'t/r-{-0-py\
458 V.ilL VALI-IY DRI\/E vAlL, Cc) gt6jz
r.o. lc)x 7, r tL. co Erq59 t7o-+7s.Bo:5 F$( g7o_47g.8034
I
RSS
fit&fr
it'('s.WI'
/)1'tt, fi{zy'vr lcE:
AO it'/-r r <a-t
t'v.:'i- /0 Olct€E'2 /OAL<'
i*/i6df-{. ,Y#.-,: :;- :c:f *- -, ,
-;.'*i@:.r":.: ,
I
6as
I
64rcc
//*rs-nac 64s
/ac''o
/ ctc4-t ("<'r
U)t Si- llt{ugrr"
I
P
I
I
ir
GA5 tsffiU/gIDE tsUFNER
9TOt'tE
r r rr rr EXI9TllllGr.lJll\E ELEC- Plr FrN^r TO REMI
-t-
EXI9
LIVING
LINE OF ./BALCONY AEV./
V ITT
EX
t
=xl9Tlt{GRE FLACE
Extgt|hlc
FIECI-.IAN ICAL HANIFOL
ACCE55 PANEL
DIRECI \GNT
TI]RJ EXT. IIALL
EXl9Tll.lc
I'1ECI-+ANICAL
I,IANIFOLD
EXISTING
rrA6TEF-EZTg
EXI9TINGHadTre cf-og=r
I tF
9TING
EXlSTlh&3
F.PJ-1ts.
+
ING
EXI9TII{GSTEAI,l
CENERAfOR
Fo
u,. oAFHot tolPRE-FAE ]CA3 FIRE PLACEIU/RAISED Ir-.lEARTl.{
|
I
RELOCATED
T.V. ENT. CAts.
EXl9Tll.lc
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO StatemeNrt
Statement Nr:mber: R050OOO9O9 Arnount: $250.00 06/22/2OO5O4:17 PM
Palment Method: Check Init: aIS
Notation: 28113,/NBDBO
CONSTRUCTION
Permit No: DRB05O292 Tl4)e: DRB-Minor Alt, Comm/Multi
Parcel No: 2LOL-OS2-7I00-4
Site AddreEs: 458 VAIL VALLEY DR \IAIL
IJocation: GOI,DEN PEAK CONDOS, #4
ToEaI Feea: $250.00This Payment: $250.00 ToUaI AL,L Pmts3 9250.00
Balance3 $0.00*****a+*++**l+t,l***+t*+at******t*+aXat***l**fff*+*ta*****l***********+***********t*t++++****
ACCOI,JNTITEM LIST:
Account Code Deacription Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO3TL22OO DESIGN REVIEVI FEES 250.00
Remote Controls
Standard Features
. Digital room remperature reading. Easy installadon. Built-in surge suppressor means Heat-N-Glo
remotes aren't affected by line volrage fluctuations. Heat-N-Glo remores are programmable and ideal
for mulci-unir applications. Remotes are Non-Directional and can be operated
from anpvhere within range. 120 minute "Sleep Timer" allows auromatic
shut-offif desired (SMART-STAI n,
SMART-BATT II, RCI,MLT II)
RC-ELEC
The RC-ELEC is uscd with
Heat-N-Glo clcctric fi replece
models. It can turn the
fireplace on and off.
RC.SMART II
The RC-Smarr nor only
turns rhc {ireplacc on and
offi it digitally displays the
tcmperaturc of the room at
all times.
SMART.STAT II
Hear-N-Glo's Remorc ControL
Thcrmostat conrrols dre
tcmperarurc of your room
by rurning rhc fircplacc on
end offwhcn ir reachcs a
sct rcrnperuura.
Terra Coaa Cap
Cool to the Touch
DVK.TVCD/SLK.99I DA
(Vcrtical tcrorirrarion)
Designed ro work wirh our gas
dirccr vent and B-veot sysrcms as
wcll u thc woodbuming 300 and
I 100 serics pipc, the Ttrra Cotta
Cap providcs a aarr-rra.l clay tih look
to cap off rhe homeowncrb chasc
and rcstore cheir homc's oLrtdoor
facade to a traditional look that
dr.rminum caps dont providc.
TCG375 for D\? Pipc, TCT375
ror ntuu )cfles rtPe, I Ll l l /)
for SL1l00 Series Pipe.
RCI:MXI II
Thc RCT-MII allows
homeowners to turn the
fireplacc on and off, vary
rhc blowcr spced and vary
rhe flamc hcight on cheir
0rcplace as well as
maintain the tcmpcmtrrre
In your toom.
SMART.BAIT II
The SMART-BAfi opentcs
completely on bartcrics. lt is a
Rcmote Conrrol Thcrmostar
rhar controls the remperacure
ofyour room by rurning thc
Iireplace on and offwheo ir
rcaches a sct tcmperaturc.
DRC-RADIUS
For use with DVK-0lTRD and SLK-0lTRD
(Decoradvc rouch for your home)
COOL.ADD
For use wirh DVK-0ITRD
(Cool ro the touch for high trafTic area)
CAP^ Finish Your Project in
,{ terminadon cap is required to 6nish rhe installadon of your new fireplace. Diffierent varieties are available ro suir rhc usre ofmosr consurners.
IHEAT.N.GIS'
No one bullds a better ttrg
,!-1,eg.+ "1['ffinJJt'li"i"#lititTi*to"t
\i^^( (.r*L(o;n- 51+
v&,Wlifr"
l-t!1
7
Legal Description:. Lol
Subdivision:
Address:
Developer:
Project Number:
I mprovement Completion Date:
DEVELOPER IM PROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGBEEM_ENT, made and entered intoJhis lilA ouv or Mil .zoo4,
by and among Vrre he "Developed'), and the Town of
Vail (the "Town").
(address, legal description, and project number) wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the
judgement of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certain improvements set
forth in the attached estimated bid(s) in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of this
Agreement, including completion of the all improvements referred to in this Agreement, by means
of the following:
The Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as
escrow agent, in t[e amount ot $ 6, 702 , (O (125% of the total costs of the
attachedistimatedbid(s))as"on@fal|improvementsreferredto
in this Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and agreements,
the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to furnish all equipment and
materials necessary to perform and complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement. The
Developer qgreeg to complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement on or before the _
dav of Ll 3o /
manneiZilil-fr:rovGments reteneo to in this Agreement, in accoidance with ;ll approved plans
and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of
Vail, and to do all work incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and to
the satisfaction of, the Town Planner, the Town Engineer, the Town Building
Official, or other official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or
service districts, as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed
complete until approved and accepted as completed by the Community
Development Department and Public Works Department of the Town of Vail.
CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
F:\cdev\Bilf\Proiects\DlA\OlA Cash draft 121202.doc Paae 1 of 5
' .'A ...
' \i"' '
;I i. .._ .
- , rlr.!.:^r' .
l
2. To secure and guarantee performance of the obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide collateral as follows:
A cgsbdgrosit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in the amount of
$ 6t7VJ (125% ol the total costs of the attached estimated
bid(s)) as collateral for the completion of all improvements refened to in this
Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth above
for another form of security or collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein in this Agreement and the performance of
the terms of this Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative security or collateral
shall be at the Town's sole discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occuning to the work specified in this
Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall ihe Town, nor any
officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the nature
of said work, but all of said liabilities shall be and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon
any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse the Town for
any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in connection with
investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action. This indemnity
provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer my have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply for and the Town may
authorize a partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category of
improvement after the subject improvement is constructed in compliance with all plans and
specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no condition shall the
dollar amount of the collateral that is being held by the Town be reduced below the dollar amounl
necessary to complete all uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement.
6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements
referred to in this Agreement are not constructed in compliance with the approved plans and
specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail or
not accepted by the Town as complete on or before the date set forth in Paragraph 1 of this
Agreement, the Town may, but shall not be required to, draw upon the security refened to in this
Agreement and complete the uncompleted improvements refened to in this Agreement. Pursuant
to Section 12-11-8, Vail Town Code, the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy refened to in this
Agreement may be revoked until all improvements referred lo herein are completed by the
Developer or the Town in accordance with this Agreement.
Flcdev\Bif l\Projecls\DlA\DlA CasF drall_121202.doc Page 2 of 5
lf the costs of completing the uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement
exceed the dollar amount of the deposit, the excess, together with interest al twelve percent
(12%) per annum, shall be a lien against the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be
certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be collected in the same manner as delinquent ad
valorem taxes levied against such property. lf the Developer fails or refuses to complete the
improvements referred to in this Agreement, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation
of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations), of the Vail Town Code, and the Developer shall be subject to
penalties pursuant to Section 12-3-10 (Violations: Penalties) and Chapter 1-4 (General Penalty),
of the Vail Town Code.
7. The Developer shall warranty the work and materials of all improvements refened
to in this Agreement located on Town property or within a Town right-of-way, pursuant to Chapter
8-3, of the Vail Town Code, for a period of two years after the Town's acceptance of said
imorovements.
8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from time
to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto.
Flcdel^Bif l\Projecls\DlA\DlA Cash drafl_121202.doc Page 3 of 5
Dated the day and year first above written O
V^t /Z*t pr*ttuul( Cr|-p-,
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
iW;xl :1
off
'
? Pi''' o'.ou"'
"
n!ffi [ t jy.i s:f l'['
7 .'.{ffi '$nilF
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNryOFEAGLE )
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:,tt I r .7 ud?
ss.
)
)ss.
fr5'+.i#
'f.ggl,.t9*gftaJ4
nowledged bFfore me this
Flcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\0lA Cash dntl_12'l202.doc Page 4 of 5
ATTACHED COPIES OF THE ESTIMATED BID{S)
FlcdeflBill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash draft_121?02.doc Page 5 of 5
AlR. 15 2ilC4,,i1:07AM{ nn VRDc coNSTRUOTICN 970-845_23581x N0, N0.6935 i. 2P, 02,'
filEwfzcolrP rtf
s65 N,Ton Mile Dtittc, Uttil A'1
PO, Aox 6536
Ffsao, CO 80:la9
e70458.{70o
Fa\: 070$88-9400
April 15,2004
Vitil Rcsorts DcveloPmurt QomPan/
Paul Schwaz
P.O. Box 959
l3? Bcnclunark Road
Avorr, Cotorado 81620
Re: Gol<lcn Pcaks Rikc Pah AsPhalt
Pattl
I Ierc is rlrc inhrnrarion you hrve rcqustetl for the TTlolt for rhc biko path that is
goi'g ro bc rcgoreoU onOiri*-"ffiiintt.tf"a undci the Goldcn Peala Project.
843 s/f C} $ 6.43 = $ 5420,4e
lf you havc ally qucstions plcasc contacl me'
H,#4
Sr. Supcrintcndertt
Tlrc WeitzConrPmY, LLC
Cc: Datr Vickers
MirttUnclcrwood
G$lEn^L ol$fn^Crui ' AES'C f'turlgel ' Cotrstnucflo't urt/J.cp,A
E|i{tvat . Colo,ado St'fitrya ' Ctofit*,o<t g4log# O" Mo,|es ' o/tah' ' P' tc,nfi' WaEl loln
'uat
GP Bike Path Bond 12.Apr.2004 00471951 6,782.40
Vendor Number Neme Totd Discounts
0000012588 TOWN OF VAIL 0.00
Check Number Drte Handling Code Total Amount Discounts Teken Total Paid Amount
168935 12.Apr.2004 PC 6,782.40 0.00 6,782.40
tlCUlI- The Tour ef tfl
.20_6(L
RECEIVED FROM 'tp f u* s
N9 55120DATE
ADDRESS
Police Reccipt Numbcn
16266902
IFozrib
N:E
'-'..
{D'o
-2
doF.ooFErHQr,7a
(,Q
F
I
EI
U
F
E
H
91
o{o
E
E
€{
d|
o
'rdlol{
ia4
:t rr
!l>ct {,a"
FIA AJ
(a
..5
4a vr>D
l]
FoF
AF.2Z
EO
F:I E
Ftrzz:oF=
p
frFA2dDroFIE
a2
ooAE
A
E.
o
t:lF
F
zo
F.
FlcEU
297
EI
=FrFr dovr do
(J()
o
po
F
d
FIc
z
FI
FI
I
ic6E>
E=rr.trd o
HO I
This packet contains all
information related to the
Town Council approvals of the
Golden Peak Ski Base
Revdevelopment APPlications.
TC worksessions: 11128195
r2l5l95
Evening meetings: l2l5l95 (lst Reading of Ord. 24)
l2ll9l95 (2nd Reading of Otd.24)
3119196 (Amendment to operational
mgnt.plan)
Jrf
\
li FILE COPY
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
March 19, 1996
7:30 P.M.
A.regular meeling of the Vail Town council was held on Tuesday, March 19, 1996, in the CouncilChambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:30P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:Robert W Armour, Mayor
Sybill Navas, Mayor pro-Tem
Kevin Foley
Rob Ford
Mike Jeweft
paul Johnston
Ludwig Kuz
TOWN OFFIC|ALS pRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorneypamela A. Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Town resident and pEC member, GregAmsden, requested Council to consider allowing private developers to propose Town of Vaildevelopments rather than hiring consultants to analyze projects and duplicate steps. Greg alsosuggested opening up the Vail Commons project to iocai tenOers.
Item number two on the agenda was the consent Agenda which consisted of the following items:
4 Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of February 6, 1996.B' ordinance No' 4, series of 1996, sJcond readinj oi an oroinance amendingChapter 18.18, Section 18.18.090 Density Control, UIOium-oensity Famity frraouffjDistrict of the Vail Municipal Code.C' Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1996, second reading of First Amendment to the Town ofVail Employees, pension plan.
Mayor Armour read the title in full. A motion was made by Paul Johnston to approve the ConsentAgenda with a second from sybill Navas. Mike Jewett requested the transcript of ltem No. Four ofthe.February 6 bvening meeting relating to discussion of Resolution 5, series of 1gg6, be attachedto the minutes as part of the approvar. A vote was taken and passed unanimousry, 7-0.
Third on the agenda was ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance AmendingTitle 16 (Sign Code) and Title 18, Chapter 18.54 (Design Review Guidllines) of the Vail rrrruni"ip"jcode' Mayor Armour read the title in full. Town oi vait ptanner, Randy Siouoer, presented the itemand-gave the following background: A Technical Advisory Commiftee,'("fnC"l, *'"r formed to gria"staff in lhe formulation of amendments to the Sign Code and Design Review Guidelines that willexpedite the development review process foiitems or minimai complexity. The proposedamendments were reviewe_d bY the DRB and the PEC, and include the recommendations of Staff,the TAC, the DRB and the PEC. The PEC unanimously (7-0) recommended that the Town Councilapprove ordinance No.9-attheirmeeting on March 1i, tggo. Staff recommended approval ofOrdinance No' 9, Series oJ 1996 on first reading with changes which were requested by Councilat their work session that day. Paul moved to approve ordinince g, Series or tsso on Rrst 1.""Jingwith changes as discussed and the motion was seconded by Rob Ford. A vote was then taken andpassed unanimously, 7-0.
Item number four on the agenda was Ordinance No. 10, Series of 19g6, first reading of anordinance amending Section 2.24.O20, Members-Appointments-Terms of the planning an-dEnvironmental Commission; Section 2.26.020 Arts Board-Appointment; Section 2.26.030 Members-Appointments-Terms of Town of Vail Arts Board; and seaion 1g.s4.o2o(b) Board Organization.Mayor Armour read the title in full. Assistant Town Manager, Pam Brandmeyer, presented the itemand provided the following background: At the time of fhe recent board appoinrments it becameapparent that it was in the best interests of the organization to have a consistent date of terminationfor the Planning and Environmental commissionl f pEc'), the Design Review Board, (,,DRB"), andt[9 nrtg Board, ("A|PP"). lt is believed that the date of May the t si, Ueing between t]re ,eaions,offers the best time for transition of members. Additionally, ine ntpp boari requested an increasein its membership due to the amount of interest in the community to participate and because an
Vail Torrn Council Evoning Mo€ting Mlnll.soor 9/96
'{rl
increased membership would ease the obligation of members to attend all meetings. Sybill Navassaid she thought many locals would be out of Town.on May 1, and suggesteO cnlangi;g ine daieto April 1, and other members agreed. Sybill also said she felt the last interview procesi didn't allowenough time to spend with applicants. Pam felt the recent ovennhelming number of individualsresponding to the Town's request for board applicants was a rare occurrence, and suggested thatin the future interviews could be staggered and could take place during two or three wo=r* sessions.
Mayor Armour suggested that increasing the number of AIPP members might create problems inlilling those positions in future years. Sybill then recommended changing tne epnt 1 date to March31 so date of appointment would not be April Fools Day. Sybill then rioved to approve with thecondition that the date be changed to March 31, and Kevin Foley seconded the moiion. A vote wastaken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Fifth on the agenda was Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinancerepealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1994, to all for the construction of a Type lllEmployee Housing Unit in the Cornice Building; to amend the development plans for SfecialDevelopment District No. 32 in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail tvtunicipat boJe;and setting forth details in regard thereto. Council was requested by the applicant to table this itemto the April 2, 1 996 evening meeting. Paul moved to table OrdinanCe t',to.
-g,
Series of 1996, io theApril 2' 1996 evening meeting with a second from Sybill, and the motion passed unanimousiy, 7-0.
Item number six on the agenda was a request to amend the Golden peak OperationalManagement Plan. Council was asked to approve or deny the amendment to the Golden peak
Operational Management Plan. A copy of a letter to Town Planner, Jim Cumutte, from DaveCorbin, Vice President of Development for Vail Associates, outlining the proposed amendment tothe Golden Peak Operational Management Plan was distributed to council members. TownAttomey, Tom Moorhead, presented the item along with Jim Curnutte, and Town tvtanager, nobMcLaurin, and provided the following background: Town Council was being asked to co-nsiAerareguest by Vail Associates, lnc., the applicant, to amend the Golden peak Operationa,Management Plan. The request would allow the 150 parking spaces in the parking struiture to be
9{ered as first tier parking memberships. This would be an increase from the prelenly permitted75 parking memberships provided in Section ll. Managed Parking Structure as apprbved in thedevelopment plan. The request did nal include a modification to buitOing plans, s1e or landscapeplan or any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential floor arJa; change the number'ofdwelling or accommodation units. The reguested amendment involved only thJoperation of themanaged parking structure. Dave Corbin, reviewed the goals of the appiicant, ine prevlouity
approved plan, and presented the proposed amendment to the plan. Janet Woodard, who was incharge of selling the project for Vail Associates, updated Council on the issues
"tr" *"" t""ing inselling the spaces in the proposed structure. Jim Lamont, representing the East VillJgeHomeowners Association expressed the neighborhood's desire to keep parking under control. Aftirguestions from Council members were addressed, Sybill moved to appiove the amendment to theGolden Peak operational Management Plan with a second from Mike jewett. A vote was taken andpassed unanimously, 7-0.
Seventh on the agenda was a discussion regarding Employee Housing Unit 58 at InnsbrookMeadows Subdivision. Prompted by an earlier phone message to Town planner, Andy Knudtsen,from local real estate salesman and PEC member, Greg Amiden, and receipt of a letter from locaireal estate broker, Sue Dugan, Council members received input regarding deed restrictedEmployee Housing Units in the Town of Vail. Mayor Armor stated that because Ordinance No. g
had been tabled, the Council was able to include this item on the evening's agenda. Discussionparticularly centered around Employee Housing Unit 58 at Innsbrook UeaO]ows,-ano tfre arlumeniof whether or not a potential buyer for that unit qualified as an Eagle County full time eritoy"".Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead reviewid definitions and qualificitions as ouflined in the TownCode, and referenced his memo to Council dated March 19, 1996. Andy Knudtsen informedCouncil as to how he anived at his decision that the potential buyer did not qualify forthe purchase
of the unit. Mr. Bob Borne, developer of the project, suggested revising the restrictive covenantform so that it would clearly state the criteria and to avoid iny confusion in the future. Sue oug;n,buyer's agent, felt the covenant was confusing and needed to be changed. Council concirnsregarding the various projects and varying requirements for different typeJ of Employee HousingUnits were addressed by staff. Town Manager, Bob McLaurin informed Councii r6rU"o tn"iwould have time during the upcoming work session on March 26 to further discuss these issues'.
Item eight on the agenda was a report from the Town Manager. Bob McLaurin stated he had
nolhing to add, but briefly reviewed his memorandum, asking council members to review a draftof the upcoming Community Survey. Sybill asked about the "expand street capacity" question
under the Transportation and Streets section, and asked if it was refening io the West VailInterchange. Additionally, she wondered if Question 14 should be includJd, and suggesteJ
Val Totri Councl Ev.nitC lltroting Mirr..O3,t1lD6
tl
rephrasing guestion 17 relating to'essential services". Bob McLaurin stated that staff would lookinto Sybill's concerns.
There being no further business Rob moved for adjoqrnment and the meeting was adjourned atapproximately 9:25 p.m.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Minutes lakon by Holly Mccutcheon
('Nam.! ol cortdn indlvldullr who gav. publlc Inp{t may ba Inlcqratc.)
Vlll lom Councll Evqlho moorino Miltnc|o3rr9A6
I
2
PT]BLIC NOTICE
VAIL TOW]\ COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday- March 19. 1996, 7:30 p.m.
Vail Municipal Building council chambers, 75 South Frontage Road
On Tuesday, March 19, 1996,ator after 7:30 p.m. the Vail Town Council will consider a request
by the applicant to amend the Golden Peak Operational Management Plan. This request is to ailow
the 150 parking spaces in the pa*ing structure to be offered as first tier parking memberships. This
would be an increase from tbe presently Jrermitted 75 parking m.,rnbeniips piovided in S.ction tt.
Managed Parking Structure as approved in the developmentplan.
This request does not include a modification to building plans, site or landscape plan or any proposalto change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the number of dweitin! or
accommodation units. The request does involve the operation of the managed parking .ttu"to".
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
!1SnlaryuaSe interpretation avaihbb upon requesl with 24 hour notiftcation. please ca1 47g-z114voice or479-2356 TDD for information.
t r. +-<vQa-U,a\*
g-.t"".q--
,Sso f
.r :,\} c^
-.1' \ d'5r $iJ-9.-.<
I
'!-,q,l.]
s
tl
!)
Ua
.ii,
B
Pti
z
-,L>';!,,.-'n{
Vs!"eV-
)C</ -$
I' .l'cr
1 ; "' *z . ii:.ll .1-,':^{
g^i=,.+,*
t\"r, 'i:i'Eg€h
$;
ET|\6{:.i:
RS
tr(!
Fi
N
C.l
PUBLIC NOTICE
VAIL TOWN COIJNCIL MEETTNG
va' Municipa, rffil'?! 3fi" Frontage Road
On Tuesday, March 19, 1996, at or after 7:30 p.m. the Vail Town Council will consider a request
by the applicant to amend the Golden Peak Operational Management Plan. This request is to ailow
the 150 parking spaces in the parking structure to be offered as first tier parking memberships. This
would be an increase from the presently permitted 75 parking memberirips provided in Section II.
Managed Pariring Structure as approved in the development plan.
This request does not include a modification to building plans, site or landscape plan or any proposalto change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the number of dweiling or
accommodation units. The request does involve the operation of the managed parking structure.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
!1S-n!1Su9Se interpretauon available upon request with 24 hour notification. please cail 47g-z114voice or479-2356 TDD for information.
NNoo
Iz
J.lr
F
B
A
Fo
Fj
tl6(uooqFErtu)
rt .dotrpc{
3U -if,
Ni{ +lF{oEl rdFlooln
E\t
eFiekl
Iub(s
t\
€
a
€I€
E\'
s
Fis
r&ct
sF
ori naerhuT
GdJb" fevk*R'ne2f +oi Pb'u le
#r*e fiqr J ;tet-TT
€rvl4: .lrs *ner-E
fS-fietE
.-._--*_\-_- ta:
,farce&,+t"' uP b lse Tet Z-
;fvt itl
.\ tr€ L - sft-i( oe Ae/e^ede-s
- 5'k; gc-lncyt( rv4"t**4"i',Fps
- CL itdrcr* c+,-,r6t' fut*t#g
{}^ lo ' ,* - , Oy'i* Ld;&, ,**
--n ,/sl n/q6-t /
o
,"n*Udc[gt f,L/&Yte,
Q,c'Ccs,
t "-Ce'rV{*
R*t
jo
t:1t
<{?x
tc, .
€
,k{"- :tr € u{,'(,>*{-o rs [-,rt^ cqD elogry,
bc wgcl,+ Jo nnvfrfr ,4,2,b{.o7
@*C." t$q ***rg|,fi9a."tn"& qs@
ad;uLA t!,t ;*/i €qf rr*'ln<yV*,wld!@ iu,7*ta'"'er{5 D #q fofurc--b
I L illy *"( qlouiiaf6d/w1 /e *suc;ae"< - 4at e F rgrt2 "-i; #;r& &=n /M*
.E<utiL-,Py, y"?t ,yitt J:;ff y'-ur'frn y 4 €
W-;t{i*}&tf gdev(iC,2tL, ^jit";t;;i h a#rc,1*'" 7-ofi,.iKt Vaor.rc:f
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 19,1996
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
1.
2.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
Consent Agenda:
A.
B.
c.
Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of February 6, 1996.
ordinance No.4, series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance amending
chapter 18.18, section 18.18.090 Density controt, Medium-Density Famity (MDMF]
District of the Vail Municipal Code.
ordinance No. 6, series of 1996, second reading of First Amendment to the Town
of Vail Employees' Pension Plan
3.
4.
ordinance No. 9, series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance Amending Tiile 16 (sign
Code) and Title 18, Chapter 18.54 (Design Review Guidelines) of the Vail Municipal iode.
Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance amending Section 2.24.020,
Members-Appointments-Terms of the Planning and Environmental Commission; Section
2.26.020 Arts Board-Appointment; section 2.26.03o Members-Appointments-Terms of
Town of Vail Arts Board; and Section 18.il.020(b) Board Organization.
Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Ordinance No. 7, Series ot 1994, to all for the construction of a Type lll Employee Housin!
Unit in the Comice Building; to amend lhe development plans for Special tievelopmeni
District No. 32 in accordance with chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code; and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
Request to Amend Gclden Peak Operational Management plan.
Town Manqgeds Report.
Adjoumment.
5.
6.
7.
8.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIi' ES ARE APPROXIXATE AiID SUB.'ECT IO CHANGE'tt||ttl
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSTONwlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 3126196, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwlLL BE oN TUESDAY,4t2tg6, BEG]NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL GHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwlLL BE oN TUESDAY,4tzlg6, BEG|NN|NG AT 7:30 p.M. tN Tov couNctl GHAMBERS.
|||l
Sign fanguage interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. please cail 479-2114 voice or479-2356 TDD for information.
C:\AGENDA.TC
7:30 P.M. 1.
7:35 P.M. 2.
7:40 P.M. 3.
Randy Stouder
8:25 P.M. 4.
Pam Brandmeyer
Kathy Langenwalter
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 19,1996
7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
CITIZEN PARTICI PATION.
Consent Agenda:A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of February 6, 1996.B. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance
amending Chapter 18.18, Section 18.18.090 Density Control,
Medium-Density Family (MDMF) District of the Vail Municipal Code.C. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1996, second reading of First Amendment
to the Town of Vail Employees' Pension Plan.
Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996, first reading of an Ordinance Amending
Title 16 (Sign Code) and Title 18, Chapter 18.54 (Design Review Guidelines)
of the Vail Municipal Code.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:Approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of
1996, on first reading.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A Technical Advisory Committee was
formed to guide staff in the formulation of amendments to the Sign Code
and Design Review Guidelines that will expedite the development review
process for items of minimal complexity. The proposed amendments have
been reviewed by the DRB and the PEC, and embody the recommendations
of Staff, the TAC, the DRB and the PEC. The PEC unanimously (7-0)
recommended that the Town Council approve Ordinance No. 9 at their
meeting on March 11, 1996.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approvalof Ordinance No.
9, Series of 1996 on first reading.
Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance amending
Section 2.24.02O, Members-Appointments-Terms of the Planning and
Environmental Commission; Section 2.26.020 Arts Board-Appointment;
Section 2.26.030 Members-Appointments-Terms of Town of VailArts Board:
and Section 18.54.020(b) Board Organization.
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, modify, or deny Ordinance
No. 7, Series of 1996, on first reading.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the time of the recent board
appointments it became apparent that it was in the best interests of the
organization to have a consistent date of termination for the planning and
Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board, and the Arts Board.
It is believed that the date of May the 1st, being between the seasons, offers
the best time for transition of members.
The Arts Board is interested in increasing its membership due to the amount
of interest in the communig to participate and an increased membership will
ease the obligation of members to attend all meetings. The Arts Board will
be meeting on Monday, March 18, 1996 to confirm the suggested number
of eleven members. The addition of the Design Review Board member is
consistent with what has been occurring in practice.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approvat of Ordinance No.
7, Series of 1996 on first reading.
8:40 P.M. 5.
George Ruther
Tom Braun
8:55 P.M. 6.
Bob McLaurin
Tom Moorhead
Jim Curnufte
Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance repealing
and reenacting Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1994, to all for the construction
of a Type lll Employee Housing Unit in the Comice Building; to amend the
development plans for Special Development District No. 32 in accordance
with Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code; and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCI L: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No.
8, Series of 1996 on second reading,
BACKGROUND: On February 12, 1996, Tom Braun, representing the
property owner David Smith, appeared before the Planning and
Environmental Commission with a request for a Major Amendment to
Special Development District (SDD) No. 32, to allow for the construction of
an employee housing unit, located at the Cornice Building, 362 Vail Valley
Drive/part of Tract B, Vail Village 1st Filing. In addition to the proposal to
construct an employee housing unit in the Cornice Building, the applicant
also proposed a change to the approved development plan with regard to
the outdoor lighting requirements. The applicant was seeking greater
flexibility in the outdoor lighting requirement than is currenily allowed by
Chapter 18.54, Design Review, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Upon review of the Major SDD Amendment request, in accordance with
Section 18.40.100 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Ptanning and
Environmental Commission approved a motion to recommend approval of
the Major SDD Amendment request to the Town Council. The Planning and
Environmental Commission recommended approval with the following
conditions:
1. That the proposed employee housing unit, within the Cornice
Building, not be eligible for sale separately from the single-family
dwelling unit.
2. That any previous approvals for outdoor lighting on the property be
voided by this approval.
3. That the internal access door between the existing garage and the
proposed employee housing unit be eliminated.
The motion to recommend approval of the Major SDD Amendment request
passed 3-1-1 (Bowen dissented, Amsden abstained).
A copy of the memorandum prepared for the Planning and Environmental
Commission, dated February 12, 1996, has been attached for reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the memorandum
prepared by staff forthe Planning and Environmental Commission (2/12l/96),
the Communlty Development Department recommends approval of the
proposed Major Amendment to Special Development District No. 32, the
Cornice Building.
Request to Amend Golden Peak Operational Management plan.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or deny amendment to the
Golden Peak Operational Management Plan.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Town Council has been asked to consider a
request by VailAssociates, Inc., the applicant, to amend the Golden Peak
Operational Management Plan. This request is to allow the 150 parking
spaces in the parking structure to be offered as first tier parking
memberships. This would be an increase from the presenily permifted 75
parking memberships provided in Section ll. Managed Parking Structure as
approved in the development plan.
This reguest does not include a modification to building plans, s1e or
landscape plan or any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential
floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units. The
request does involve the operation of the managed parking structure.
9:55 P.M. 7. Town Manager's Report.
10:00 P.M. 8. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(aLL nmElr ARE AppRoiTl=i.i i""*ro CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,3126196, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. lN Tov couNclL GHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,4/296, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXTVAILTOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,412196, BEG|NN|NG AT 7:30 P.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
|||il1
Sign fanguage interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information.
Cr\AGENDA.TCE
Vail Associates Real [state 0roup, Inc.FAft tr €
ffitrf00trf,Wr.ffiV'DEPT'
March 19, 1996
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
1301 Vail Valley Drive
Vail, Co 81657
VIA FACSIMILE 479-2452
RE: Proposed Amendment to Golden Peak Operational Management Plan
Dear Jim:
Vail Associates has continued to market the first and second tier parking
memberships for the Golden Peak base facility parking structure since the Council's
approval of the project in December. We have successfully marketed all of the 75
first tier memberships, but have only sold 16 of the second tier memberships. As
you may recall, the second tier consists of up to 450 memberships, 200 of which
were contemplated for the first offering to the public.
Clearly the market reception to the two memberships has been strongly weighted in
favor of the "guaranteed" parking space of the tier one membership. The objection
to the tier two membership is that the member can not always be assured that a space
is available for them and lacking that assurance they do not wish to substantially
invest in the membership which would pay for the parking structure. Given this
market objection to the second tier product Vail Associates proposes amending the
Golden Peak Operational Management PIan to provide for up to 600 members, an
increase of 75 members from the current 525 permitted. In addition, the applicant
proposes that the first tier could consist of up to 150 members who have a right to
park in an identified, reserved parking space. In effect what we are proposing is that
the operational management plan allow for both types of parking memberships, the
tier one and the tier two, but that the marketplace would determine the mix of these
memberships types and that theoretically all of the spaces could be sold as tier one
memberships.
Dcvchpe6ofvail,
,edr"r Crcel'Resort
Sa.helo/ G ul. h V i llage"
137 Benchmark Road . PO Box 959 . Avon, Colorado . 81620 . phone 970 845 2535 . fax 970 845 2555 tt
Mr. Jim Curnette
March 19. 1996
Page2
The applicant understands and presumes that the Town's concem with the potential
increase of tier one memberships will be the utilization of the spaces. Vail
Associates likewise does not wish to invest a very significant sum of money in this
parking structure and have the spaces stand idle. However, we anticipate utilization
of the spaces, whether tier one or tier two will be quite high. We have conducted a
survey of the existing tier one members and of the 36 members responding, 33, or
91Yo, indicated that they would either be frequent users of the facility themselves or
would participate in a rental pool and place their parking spaces into the pool for use
in their absence by the public under our operational management. Only 3 of the 36
respondents (9%) saidthey were not interested in participating in a rental pool.
Vail Associates further proposes to amend the Golden Peak Operational
Management Plan to explicitly provide for the creation of a rental pool program for
the first tier parking memberships. We propose adding the following language to
paragraph 2,page 7, beginning with the following as the third sentence:
The frrst tier members will be incented to place their parking space in a rental
pool program available to guests, members of the skiing public, employees,
or other persons who must call and reserve available spaces in advance. The
first tier members participating in this program would advise or notifr the
club manager of those times or occasions when they would not be using their
parking space and it would be available for rental by reservation. The
proceeds from the first tier rental program would be split so that 50% of the
revenues achieved would go directly to the member's account offsetting their
dues and 50% would go to the operating expenses of the Golden Peak
Passport Clubhouse, indirectly offsetting or reducing the dues requirements
of the members. Vail Associates as manager of this facility will directly
market these available parking spaces to parents of the Golden Peak
Childrens Ski School program, parents of DEVO and other special programs
participants, private ski lesson customers and identifiable front range guests.
Beginning in the 1996/97 ski season ski school clients will be able to phone
in reservations for the ski school and through a computerized reservation
system Vail Associates will offer daily parking in the Golden Peak structure
from the pool to these customers and guests and will provide a phone number
for parking reservations available to the public.
t,
Mr. Jim Curnette
March 19, 1996
Page 3
The combination of frequent use by first tier members, the financial incentives to
pool available spaces into a rental progmm, and the direct marketing efforts for these
pooled spaces should result in high utilization ofthe first tier spaces.
The creation of the underground parking structure has always been a unique and
complicated component of the Golden Peak development plan. A number of
planning and development goals hinge on the success ofthis unique structure and its
management. The neighborhood has sought a controlled access underground
structure to reduce traffic volumes, adverse traffic impacts and visual clutter in the
neighborhood. Vail Associates has favored the concept of this structure to achieve
this traffic control, as well as to increase the site surface areas available for skier
drop-off, skier and pedestrian circulation, and green space. The only complicating
factor for Vail Associates has been the creation of a mechanism to pay for this
extraordinary parking solution. The Town's goals have been to insure that there is
no net loss ofphysical parking spaces nor a reduction in utilization ofthese parking
spaces that would be equivalent to a net loss ofparking available to the public. It is
our belief that the proposed amendments to the Operational Management Plan will
continue to meet these multiple goals of controlling traffic, increasing the site surface
area for other beneltcial uses, and achieving high utilization of the parking
constructed. We therefore request the Council's approval of this proposed revision
to the Operational Management Plan.
Very truly,
VAIL ASSOCIATES,INC.
o*,;z L, cl___
David G. Corbin
Vice President of Development
cc: Jim Lamont, EVHOA
DGC:it
t,
THE l,A:sPoRT cLU BHoUsE
COLDEN PEA K
Charter Member Utilization Survey
03118/96 I l:59 AM
An informal phone survey of73 Charter members' expected utilization of their designated parking space at
the Passport Clubhouse at Golden Peak was conducted during the period of March 4 - 15, 1996. The
survey produced the following results:
I 73 Charter Members
o 36 respondinC e 49 7o response rate)
o 33 will be fiequent users or would participate in a rental pool concept for the following reasons:
o front range residents
o second homeowners in Vail Valley
r living in Vail Valley
o community awareness of parking availability
a 3 are not interested in participating in a rental pool
Percentage of utilization for the responding sample of members - 33 of 36 : 91,7y"
Frequent use was described as utilization of a designated parking space:
a multiple use during the week and over the weekends
o warm season use for various activities:
I Bravo attendance
r Village shopping
a Restaurant dining in the Village or at Passport Clubhouse throughout the year
278 HANS()N RANCI IIt('At) t(l B()X 7 VAI|. ( () !ll65it ()7O r7e 80OO IAX 97O-479 ll0l(l
_.rF t,ASSP()R I CLUtJIJO,,,I '.. -sF
(;OLDEN I'EAK
CHARTER PASSPORT RENTAL POOL PROGRAM
Description:
Charter Passport holders will be incented to place their parking space in a rental pool program available to guests of
Vail Mountain.
Rental Prograrn Market:
Children's ski school parents, DEVO parents, private lessons, and Front Range guests:
. Starting inthe 1996/97 ski season, ski school clients will be able to phone in their reservations. At the time of
confirmation, they can be prompted on whether they would like to have parking space at Golden Peak for the
day of their lesson, subject to availability of spaces in the rental pool for that day.
Incentives to Join Rental Programi
All proceeds from the rental program will be split as follows:c 5OVo goes directly to member's account offsetting their annual dues
c 50%o goes to the Passport Clubhouse, indirectly offsetting dues
More personalized service/better management of parking spaces
Community-minded
Operationa l/lVlanagement Tactics
Computer reservations system, similar to a golf tee time or hotel reservation system.
Users can call in using the phone key pad to type in menu choices. They will receive confirmation of a
parking space or they will leave a telephone number for the waitlist.
The system will assign parking on a first come, frst serve basis with the ability to prioritize usets based on
usage frequency.
The system will handle Signature membership reservations as well as Rental Pool reservations.
278 HAN\()N RAN( t1R()n I) I'() ll()X 7 VA . c() I|658 1)7(' 17tJ 8()(t(J I X !)7{) '17() IlOli)
Glalq,Q
GOLDEN PEAK OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
Vail Associates, Inc. (*VA') has filed an application to amend the Approved
Development Plan for the Golden Peak Base Facility. The amendments include
revisions to vehicular parking on the site, the design and function of both public
skier and Children's Center drop off, as well as alterations to employee parking, lift
capacity, and ski base operations. In the course of the submiffal, VA has made
certain representations regarding the physical site plan and the operations of the
portal. The Town of Vail Department of Community Development has requested
elaboration. This plan expands upon and supplements the application and, to the
extent it is inconsistent with the application, supplants it,
This Golden Peak Management Plan is intended to enhance the experiences
of guests to Vail and of the residents of the Golden Peak neighborhood in a manner
consistent with the goals and objectives of the agreement between the Town of Vail
(*TO\f') and Vail Associates to manage peak periods in this resort community. In
effect, the measures proposed in this plan are means of managing or controlling the
demands upon the Golden Peak portal and the impacts upon its surrounding
infrastructure. The concepts and principles of the Program To Manage Peak
Periods Agreement (the "Agreement") between TOV and VA are therefore
incorporated by reference into this management plan.
A reality that must be recognized in examining the creation of infrastructure
and operational systems for Golden Peak or Vail at large is that both the ski
company and the greater Vail community are engaged in the winter and summer
resort business. For reasons beyond the complete control of the community the
demands for and use of resort goods and s€rvices will always be subject to specific or
isolated events such as the Christmas holiday or a world class competitive or
cultural event. Events such as these will by necessity mean that Vail will experience
surg€s or peaks of visitor use that may be mitigated, but will not be entirely
overcome or eliminated by investment in hard assets. To the extent that such high
demand events tax the capacity of our systems and our collective patience, we must
also acknowledge that these events, if well managed, are also what give us life,
vitality, excitement and special appeal.
It is the effort to "manage well" that leads to the creation of this plan. In its
application VA has proposed significant physical improvements to the Golden Peak
portal. These include:
doubling the skier drop offzone capacities;
improving drop offflow and function;
giving locational primacy to public transit;
structuring and landscaping private auto parking;
improving lift access to balance portal use across the Village; and
improving base lodge facilities for the guest and local alike.
This major investment in hard assets satisfies to the highest degree possible the
programmatic requirements of the Golden Peak project's planning professionals.
The proposed management techniques which follow are meant to be flexible
guidelines and dynamic tools which may be altered, revised, enhanced, or even
eliminated over time as needs require to "manage well". And, while these
techniques are described in terms of VA or TOV responsibilities, it must be noted
that others, the greater Vail community and each and every Golden Peak neighbor,
must likewise contribute, act responsibly and treat others equitably in managing or
mitigating the impacts of use, growth and congestion during peak periods within
our community.
For their parts, pursuant to the Agreement, both VA and TOV have
immediate responsibilities to undertake growth management measures. Section III
(pages 11-16) of the Agreement outlines these immediate responsibilities under Tier
I of the Plan. VA's obligations include measures which might mitigate impacts at
Golden Peak such as providing bus passes to appropriate employees for use on the
Town of Vail system, encouraging carpooling, and pursuing Park and Ride sites for
employees. TOV's obligations, set forth in the Agreement, include controlling peak
traffic and parking issues, productive management of traffic circulation and parking
systems, creative allocation of the bus service, effective utilization of law
enforcement personnel, and better distribution of skiers to different base area
facilities.
For these purposes it is pertinent to note that in the Agreement "Peak
Periods" are defined as:
Christmas Peak That period which extends between December 26
December 31;
and
and
High Season: That period which includes Presidents'Weekend and each
weekend beginning the third weekend in February through the end of
March.
"Nonpeak Periodstt are defined as:
Those periods falling outside of the Christmas Peak and High Season and
which normally include the early ski season, Thanksgiving, the pre-
Christmas Period, the January to mid-February period, and the late ski
season.
Another pertinent concept in the Managed Growth Agreement is the
benchmark capacity of the mountain which has been defined as 19,900 skiers at one
time ("SAOT"). The theorX behind the Managed Growth Agreement is to
implement tiers of management techniques to control infrastructure demands and
operations at
consideration
or
is
below the 19,900 SAOT threshold. An additional factor for
the design day standard for Golden Peak planning studies and
infrastructure assessment which is 15,000 SAOT, a typical skier day count for the
current Christmas Peak The physical infrastructure of Golden Peak is designed to
accommodate the portal demands of a 15,000 SAOT event.
The Assessment Committee, described in Section VI of the Agreement, is the
entity charged with monitoring, evaluating, and refining the operations of the
community management plan. For the purposes of this Agreement, the Assessment
Committee is likewise charged with this responsibility, but it is understood that for
these purposes the Assessment Committee may delegate its review function to the
Vail Transportation Task Force or other designee and shall include representatives
of the affected Golden Peak neighborhood in the review process.
The project components or elements which might be considered for tiered
management techniques at Golden Peak include the following: (a) Managed
Parking Structure; (b) Public Skier and Children's Center Drop-off Areas; (c)
Employee Parking; (d) Mountain Operations; (e) Local and Community Programs,
such as DEVO; (f) Ski Club Vail Activities; (g) Adult and Chitdren's Ski School; (h)
Loading, Delivery and Trash Removal; (i) Snow Management; (i) Ticketing; and (k)
Special Events.
T. MANAGED PARKING STRUCTURE
The Approved Development Plan of 1984 depicted 130 surface parking
spaces, primarily located on the north side of Tract F along Vail Valley Drive for all
varieties of users of this particular portal and 6 interior parking spaces for the
residential condominiums. The Children's Center plan of 1988 required 12 spaces.
Taken together these total 148 spaces for drop off and parking. Presently the
surface lot existing at Golden Peak holds approximately 150 automobiles or less
depending on the amount of snow storage on the lot and the efliciencies of car
storage. Of these 150 spaces roughly 18-20 are used by employees; Spraddle Creek
Property Owners reserre and utilize E spaces; 4 spaces are used for Cross Country
Ski Van pick-up and drop-off; and approximately 118 spaces are available for use
by the skiing public for a fee.
Parking requirements for the Ski Base/Recreation District are addressed in
Section 18.39.230 of the Vail Ordinances which reads:
'oOff-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52
and/or as specified on the Approved Development Plan."(emphasis supplied)
The language of this section permits and contemplates a parking function and
design unique to this district and its development plan. In response to this unique
environment the parking structure proposed in this plan consists of 148 parking
spaces (including 5 handicapped or ADA spaces) located at or below the street
elevation and landscaped across the top to provide an aesthetic benefrt to the
development and the surrounding neighborhood. The fundamental concept of the
organization and management of these parking spaces, the equivalent of a Tier I
management technique, is to create a managed or reserved "right to park"
mechanism designed to control the availability and use of the spaces and hence cut
down on indiscriminate traffic flows while providing for and paying for the aesthetic
benefits of the landscaped structure. The mechanism formulated to provide this
managed parking product to the public is a non-equity club or association of up to
600 memben who would have the right to park in this structure for a fee. Two tiers
of membership in the association are contemplated. The first tier would consist of
up to 150 members who would have a right to park in an identified reserved parking
space. The second tier of members would be up to 450 people who have a right to
park in the structure based upon a monitored and computer controlled reservations
system. It is the intent of the applicant to initially offer 75 first tier and 200 second
tier memberships to the public, but marketplace acceptance of the tiered parking
products would determine the mix of the membership types and theoretically all of
the spaces could be sold as first tier memberships. Parking memberships would be
sold in the fall of 1995 contingent upon final approval of the Golden Peak Base
Facility Project by the Town of Vail and suflicient subscriptions to commence
construction ofthe parking structure in the spring of 1996, but no later than spring
of 1997. In the event that the necessaqr subscriptions are not forthcoming to
commence construction in 1997, VAI will initiate discussions with the Town Council
concerning payment in lieu of parking alternatives.
The first tier member would secure a right to use a particular parking space
on a year-round basis. Hence, the ratio of first tier members to parking spaces
reserved for their use would be I to 1. The first tier members witl be incented to
place their parking space in a rental pool program available to guests, members of
the skiing public, employees, or other p€rsons who must call and reserve available
spaces in advance. The first tier members participating in this program would
advise or notify the club manager of those times or occasions when they would not
be using their parking space and it would be available for rental by reservation.
The proceeds from the first tier rental program would be split so that 507o of the
revenues achieved would go directly to the member's account offsetting their dues,
and 507o would go to the operating expenses of the Golden Peak Passport
Clubhouse, indirectly offsetting or reducing the dues requirements of the members.
Vail Associates as manager of this facility will directly market these available
parking spaces to parents of DEVO and other special programs participants, private
ski lesson customers and identifiable front range guests. Beginning in the 1996197
ski season ski school clients will be able to phone in reservations for the ski school,
and through a computerized reservation system, Vail Associates will offer daily
parking in the Golden Peak structure from the pool to these customers and guests
and will provide a phone number for parking reservations available to the public.
The second tier members would have a year-round right to use a parking
space based upon availability and prior reservation, monitored by a computerized
rotation system to insure equitable and optimized use. The initial offering of second
tier memberships would constitute a ratio of approximately 2 members to every
parking space. These members would call the parking manager more than 24-hours
in advance to reserye their use of available spaces. A reservation list from among
the members would be compiled daily for the rnanagement of entry access by
personnel stationed in the attendant booth at the entry to the structure. Access into
the structure would be permitted upon presentation of a photo I.D. identifying the
bearer as a member and a confirmation of a reserved parking space on the parking
availability list.
In the event that all parking spaces are not fully reserved and utilized by the
club members, VA, as operator of the facility, resetves the right at any time of the
year to utilize unreserved spaces for other guests, members of the skiing public,
employees or other persons who likewise must call and reserve a space less than 24-
hours in advance. This short-notice use by non-members would be permitted only
on a daily basis by reservation. However, this managed operational feature would
expand the available user groups and increase the utilization ofthe structure in non-
peak periods without adding appreciable, unwanted traffic. Further, if the utility of
the structure can be maximized by offering additional memberships for sale, VA will
do so after the first year ofoperation establishes typical occupancies.
Itr. SKNERDROP OFF
Skier drop off occurs presently on the east side of the existing Golden Peak
structure and immediately to the north of the Children's Center. Existing
conditions provide for 21 head-in spaces adjacent to the Children's Center and 10
parallel, or active parking spaces, in a loop drop-off area for the general public,
totaling 3l spaces currently dedicated to all drop-off functions. The proposed plan
10
nearly doubles this capacity by providing for 30 head-in spaces dedicated to
Children's Center drop off and 29 spaces for general skier drop off north of the
proposed building, totaling 59 spaces for skier drop offat this portat.
(A.) Tier I. Management measures to be undertaken in a sequential fashion
concurrently with redevelopment include:
l. During the Christmas Peak period and Presidents' Weekend VA will
staff the General Skier and Children's Center drop off zones with 4 to 6
people, split between the drop offzones as trallic needs demand, during peak
arrival and departure hours or approximately from E:30 to l0 a.m. and 3
p.m. to 4:30 p.m. These traflic managers will direct traffrc, assist and
expedite the loading and unloading of passengers and equipment, encourage
the timely and swift departure of vehicles, and enforce restrictions against
unauthorized parking by calling for the removal or towing of offending
vehicles.
2. During the High Season period VA will staff the General Skier and
Children's drop offzones with 2 to 4 people, split between the zones as traffic
needs demand during peak arrival and departure hours.
3. During non-peak periods and during evening or night hours the drop off
zones would be staffed or managed upon the operational discretion of VA as
may be needed to prevent congestion or vehicle stacking into Vail Valley
I)rive or the bus lane. During these periods and times, except for special
1t
events, VA will permit parking by the general public in the drop-off zone
surface spaces consistent with the practice and use of other VA parking lots
such as North Day lot.
4. Permanent, static, signage at the top of Blue Cow Chute will be installed
by TOV indicating that there is no public parking at Golden Peak and that
only Children's Center and skier drop off is permitted.
5. In Section V (page 25) ofthe Agreement additional skier drop off zones
have been identified as "pressing current transportation and circulation
needs". VA will therefore coop€rat€ with the TOV in identifying additional
skier drop off zones elsewhere in the town including Ford Park, the Main
Parking Structure, Lionshead, and other locations which will be formalized
and improved by the Town of Vail. Initially TOV will develop and
implement a plan for general skier drop on the upper deck of the
Transportation Center utilizing existing physical improvements and facilities.
6. Upon the conclusion of each Peak Period and ski season the Assessment
Committee or its designee, will specifically assess access to and egress from
the mountain at Golden Peak, together with traflic and drop off impacts
associated with the skier movements and will make recommendations for
adjustments or improvements to the Tier I management techniques
described above.
t2
IV.
(8.) Tier II. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management
techniques above have been implemented and traffic congestion in the drop
off zones still results in vehicle stacking into the str€et or bus lanes to a
degree detrimental to the ordinary operation of the infrastructure, then the
following successive management efforts will be undertaken in the next
succeeding ski season:
1. VA and/or TOV will implement additional Tier I techniques which have
not yet been employed or will enhance those Tier I techniques already in use
according to the recomrnendations of the Assessment Committee.
2. TOV, pursuant to its general obligations in the Agreement to implement
pro-active management elforts in coordination with VA to control traflic, will
increase utilization of law enforcement personnel during peak periods in the
management of trallic at Golden Peak (Section Itr. A. 2. a., page l3).
3. Based upon the impacts oftralfic congestion and as transportation needs
demand, TOV will implement an electronic signage program which would
display messages on the town arterials regarding traffic conditions within the
town parking garages, drop off zone traffic status conditions and lift maze
conditions at the base portals.
EMPLOYEE PARKING
Presently 18 to 20 VA employees park at Golden Peak of the approximately
employees who are based there in Peak Periods. Another 25 to 30 spaces are500
l3
seasonally leased by VA from third parties for employee parking. The remaining
90Yo oI Golden Peak based employees park in public lots, use public transit, or use
other private parking spots.
(A.) Tier I. The following management techniques will be implemented
sequentially upon redevelopment to mitigate employee transportation
impacts and serrye the needs of the community's employees:
1. VA, together with TOV, will enter into negotiations with the Colorado
Department of Transportation to secure, if possible, an employee park and
ride intercept lot on Highway 6 in EagleVail. This lot would be used for VA
and TOV employees to park their vehicles in Eagle'Vail and utilize
established public transportation routes to continue on to their job locations
in Vail. In the event the CDOT site is not available or unsuitable, other sites
will be located and secured for a park and ride lot.
2. To the extent space availability exists during non-peak periods, V. A. will
permit managed employee parking by reserwation in the parking structure at
Golden Pealc
3. During Peak Periods VA employees will carpool to the soccer field lot
pursuant to the Holiday Traffic and Parking Plan as managed and operated
by TOV or alternatively as managed by VA.
4. During the Christmas peak period and, in fact, extending beyond it from
December 24 until January I in any given year, VA will implement its
t4
Holiday Trallic and Parking Plan. During this period VA will provide free
bus tickets for the Avon/Beaver Creek bus system to all Golden Peak based
staff. Parking in VA lots such as West Day Lot and North Day Lot, will be
available for free to employees who carpool. Employees not carpooling will
be charged a fee.
5. VA will add the Holy Cross Lot to its parking inventory for peak-period
employee carpooling.
6. As necessary, VA will assign employees carpooling locations in particular
lots among the West Day, North Day and Holy Cross properties and manage
entrT acc€ss into these properties.
7. VA will lease 20 parking spaces from a third party or, alternatively,
purchase 20 "blue" parking passes from the TOV for parking in the town
structures,
8. Upon the conclusion of each Peak Period and the ski season, th€
Assessment Committee or its designee will monitor the Tier I techniques
described above, assess the operational results, and make recommendations
for alterations or enhancements to the plan.
(8.) Tier If. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management
techniques have been implemented and employee parking and transit is still a
concern, additional methods of employee transit and parking will be
l5
v.
undertaken at the recommendation of the Assessment Committee or its
designee.
MOUNTAIN OPERATIONS
(A.) T!gd. Management measures to be undertaken during peak periods in
a sequential fashion concurrently with redevelopment include:
1. VA will extend its periods of mountain operations later into the day (e.g.
until 4;00 p.m.) to spread out the departure times of skiers from the
mountain.
2. Employee passes will be restricted during the Christmas Peak and
Presidentst weekend.
3. Improvements to the food and beverage offering at the base facility
restaurant, including apres ski and dinner offerings, will be designed to
attract the skiing public and stagger the public's departure from the portal .
4. VA will cooperate and coordinate with TOV and the Colorado
Department of Transportation regarding the installation of signage at base
facilities, including Golden Peak, advising departing skiers of road conditions
and, if conditions are adverse, inviting or advising departing skiers to stay
later in the village and draw out their departure times.
5. Upon the conclusion of each Peak Period and the ski season the
Assessment Committee or its designee will assess mountain operation impacts
t6
and make recommendations for adjustments or improvements to the Tier I
management techniques described above.
(8.) Tier II. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management
techniques have been implemented and congestion still exists in the portal
during peak periods, then the following successive management efforts will
be undertaken in the next succeeding ski season or Peak Period:
1. VA and/or TOV will implement additional Tier f measures which have
not yet been employed or will enhance those Tier I techniques already in use
according to the recommendations of the Assessment Committee or its
designee.
2. VA will continue to take operational measures to balance the
functionality and use of its portals, as well as on-mountain circulation.
DEVO/LOCAL AND COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
6'DEVO' is an abbreviation for the Vail Development Team, a Children's Ski
School Program consisting of300 children which offers specialized ski school classes
to the children of locals and front range skiers. The high concentration of locals
participating in the program results in an inordinately high drop off impact on non-
peak Saturdays which mimics peak conditions throughout the season.
(A.) I!9I-I. Measures to be sequentially undertaken concurrently with
redevelopment include:
VI.
17
1. The DEVO program does not run during the Christmas Peak or over
Presidents' Weekend. The program will continue to be limited in this
fashion.
2. Arrivals for the DEVO program will be staggered in advance of the
typical ski school or mountain opening times. DEVO arrival will be
scheduled for E:30 a.m., one-half hour prior to lift opening. Pick up will
likewise be scheduled earlier than regular mountain closure.
3. Drop offfor DEVO will be formalized and managed by DEVO instructors
in the Golden Peak skier drop offzones to prevent stacking into the streets.
4. VA will investigate splitting the DEVO program further and basing some
portion ofthe program in Lionshead or staging it at other drop offzones.
For example, moving the Freestyle Program, approximately 15% of the
DEVO skierso to another drop offzone such as the TOV structure will be
explored and implemented if alternate drop offs are created. Staging DEVO
out of the Lionshead Teen Center will also be explored with TOV, including
the creation of short-term, 30 minute, drop-off and pick-up parking spaces in
the Lionshead Parking Structure.
5. DEVO race events will be moved in whole or in part to other local courses.
6. Upon the conclusion of each ski season the Assessment Committee or its
designee will assess the impacts caused by the DEVO program and make
18
recommendations for adjustment or improvement to the Tier I techniques
described above.
(8.) Tier tr. In the event that some or all of the Tier I techniques have been
implemented and DEVO still adversely impacts portal congestion then the
following successive management efforts will be undertaken in the next ski
season or Peak Period:
l. DEVO will be relocated in part or in whole to other Vail Mountain
portals.
YII. SKI CLIIB VAIL
Ski Club Vail is a private, non-profit ski club which is not owned, operated,
or managed by VA. VA, however, provides on-mountain access for training and
racing events for Ski Club Vail. Ski Club Vail training accounts for approximately
60,000 gate starts per year and Ski Club Vail racing activities account for an
additional 15,000 gate starts per year. Generally racing activity, including Ski Club
Vail, runs from 8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. and frequently occurs seven days per week
during the ski season.
(A.) Tier I. Management measures to be taken concurrently with
redevelopment include:
f. Ski Club Vail programs will be coordinated with other special events, as
was done during thel994ll995 season, to prevent overcrowding ofgroups in
the portal at any one time.
l9
2. Start times for Ski Club Vail during peak periods and high season will be
coordinated so that Ski Club Vail arrival times will occur before the 9 a.m.
peak hour rush and will be terminated later in the afternoon to spread the
departure from the ski mountain.
3. VA will allow and encourage Ski Club Vail users to arrive and depart
using the General Skier Drop-off Zone.
4. Upon the conclusion of the ski season, the Assessment Committee or its
designee will monitor the Tier I techniques described above, assess the
impact of Ski Club Vail on the use and efficiencies of the portal and make
recommendations for alterations or enhancements to the plan.
(B.) Tier tr. In the event that some or all of the Tier I measures have been
implemented and Ski Club Yail still poses logistical problems for the
optimized use of the portal, the recommendations of the Assessment
Committee or its designee will be implemented.
1. Ski Club Vail will be terminated in whole or in part in its use of the
Golden Peak race courses and base facility.
VIII. ADULT AND CHILDREN'S SKI SCHOOLS
The Golden Peak portal is somewhat unique in that it supports a full
children's ski school, including nurserJ, as well as the adult ski school.
Approximately 37,000 ski school students per season, or an average 264 per day, are
serviced at this portal. The size and scope of ski school activities in the portal are
20
naturally constrained by the size of the base area facilities. The Children's Ski
School in particular is functionally limited by the building size and the ski yard
available for introductorv children's classes.
(A.) Tier I. Management measures to be undertaken in a sequential fashion
concurrently with redevelopment include:
l. Ski school classes will be coordinated with morning arrivals of other
special user groups so that ski school classes will sequentially follow the
arrival times ofother groups and activities and spread out portal arrivals.
2. VA will emphasize a "one stop shop" of lessons and equipment, including
overnight storage, which will reduce the need for arrival by private
automobile as well as reduce dwell times of automobiles which do arrive for
drop off.
3. VA will promote in its marketing materials the convenience of public
transit which senices the area.
4. VA will explore the implementation of telephone or electronic
preregistration in ski school, including the Children's Ski School, in an effort
to cut down the dwell times of automobiles dropping skiers off for ski school
registration.
5. Upon the conclusion of each Peak Period and the ski season, the
Assessment Committee or its designee will assess congestion in the portal
2l
related to ski school activities and make recommendations for adjustments or
improvements to the Tier I management techniques discussed above.
(8.) Tier tr. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management
techniques have been implemented and congestion associated with the ski
schools still results in crowding in the portal then the following additional
management steps will be sequentially implemented:
1. The recommendations for improvements or adjustments made by the
Assessment Committee or its designee will be instituted in the following
season or Peak Period.
2. VA will make improvements to its Lionshead Ski School facilities upon the
redevelopment of that portal taking pressur€ offof the Golden Peak portal.
LOADING, DELIVtrRY AND TRASH REMOVAL
The Golden Peak Base Facility requires the delivery of food and liquor for its
restaurant operations and trash and recycling pick-up for all functions located at
Golden Pealc Currently, food and liquor delivery takes place daily between 6:00
a.m. and 7:00 a.m. and again between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. The majority of
food and liquor deliveries are first sorted out at the Gondola Building in Lionshead,
then delivered to Golden Peak by VA employees.
Currently, there is no formal loading dock at Golden Peak which results in
the need for two (2) daily food and liquor delivery trips. In addition, there is a trash
compactor at Golden Peak currently which results in the need for daily trash
DL
22
collection at 7:00 a.m.. Recycling pick-up is done by VA and occurs as needed
concurrently with food and liquor drop-off. It is estimated that curr€nt delivery
times will remain the same to avoid interference with skier traffic, though the
addition of a formal loading area and storage may reduce the number of daily
delivery trips by VA from two (2) to one (1). The addition of a trash compactor at
Golden Peak should reduce the frequency ofdaily trips required for trash pick-up.
(A.) Tier I. Measures to be undertaken concurr€ntly with redevelopment
include:
l. Delivery times will be managed so that no delivery or trash pick-up will
occur during the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
2. The Assessment Committee will review and assess truck deliveries and
service at the conclusion of each ski season and make recomm€ndations for
alterations or improvements as necessarJi.
(8.) Tier tr. In the event that some or all of the above measures have been
implemented and if loading, delivery and/or trash removal results in
operational inefliciencies in the portal then the following management
techniques will be implemented in the next succeeding ski season:
1. The recommendations of the Assessment Committee will be implemented.
2. VA will endeavor to deliver larger loads directly to Golden Peak and store
additional food and beverage on site thus reducing the number of trips or
will arrange night delivery to avoid traffic congestion.
23
X. SNOW MANAGEMENT
Snow manag€ment at Golden Peak will be conducted in a manner similar to
that in other vA portals. Snow storage zones have been depicted upon the revised
snow storage map prepared and submitted with the Application.
(A.) Tier I. The following management elforts will be undertaken with
respect to snow storage and management during the ski season, including
peak and high season periods.
1. VA will by contract with third parties or through its own forces plow all
areas of vehicular circulation as depicted on the Snow Management Plan by
6 a.m. every morning upon a snowfall of 4 or more inches.
2. VA, through its own forces, will remove snow from sidewalks and plaza
areas depicted upon the Snow Management Plan by means of a bobcat, an
ATV and/or by hand between the hours of 7 and 8:30 on all mornings
following a snowfall of 4 inches or more.
3. VA will store snow in temporary snow storage areas within the drop off
zones and within two to seven days oI a 4" snowfall will use loaders and
trucls to r€move the snow stored there and transport it from the site.
Impacts on traffic congestion will determine the speed and frequency of
removal of snow from the temporary snow storage areas. VA will remove
snow immediately if snow storage results in congestion in the drop-off zones
causing auto stacking into the street.
24
xI.
4. At the end of each Peak Period and the ski season the Assessment
Committee or its designee will review snow removal performance during the
season and, as necessarJ, make recommendations for adjustments or
improvements to the Tier I techniques described above.
(B.) Tier tr. In the event that some or all of the Tier I techniques designed to
manage snow have not effectively cleared the snow from the drop offzones or
other public areas and/or have impacted circulation on the public streets,
then VA will implement recommendations made by the Assessment
Committee or its designee.
SPECIAL EVENTS AND SKI RACING
Golden Peak is the site of many ski races and special events during the course
of a ski season. Typically the racing season begins in mid-December and runs
through early April. Training for ski racing can be broken down as follows: Ski
Club Vail generates 60,000 gate starts per year; high school programs add 7,500
gate starts per year; and corporate/club training events add 7,500 more starts per
year. Actual racing starts for these three user groups are approximately 151000 gate
starts per year for Ski Club Vail, with an additional 2,000 starts per year for local
high school programs, and 10,000 starts per year for corporate and club racing.
These total roughly 102,000 gate starts per year and average 4.5 ski racing events
per weelc Daily activity for ski racing typically commences at 8:30 a.m. and
continues until 4:30 p.m. Of these race events two or three major televised events
25
occur each year, not all ofwhich are headquartered out ofthe Gold€n Peak counre.
These include the Pro Tour, FIS World Cup and North American Trophy Series
races. In 1999 the World Championships will be hetd at Vail and opening
ceremonies are scheduled for Golden Peak Race starts and demand for training
space have been growing steadily for the past decade.
Special Events which occur at Golden Peak, in addition to the routine racing
programs, include various snowboarding events which draw typicalty 100 to 250
people, the U.S. Pro Tour which draws about 500 people, and Hot Winter Nights
events which draw 500 to 1000 people typically in February and March and up to
3000 people during the Christmas holiday.
(A.) Tier I. Management techniques already utilized and in place at Golden
Peak or which will be implement with redevelopment include:
1. Snowboarding events typically held in non-peak periods are usually small
with minimal impact on portal arrivals or use. Arrivals and staging of event
participants will be managed with VA personnel on an ttas needed" basis.
2. Hot Winter Nights events are held during off hours and do not interfere
with other portal arrivals or demands on infrastructure. These will be
managed with VA personnel on an "as needed" basis.
3. Major events, such as televised FIS racing events, the World
Championships, major bicycle race events, and summer fireworks will be
managed through the standard special event permitting process of the TOV.
26
4. At the end of each Peak Period and ski season the Assessment Committee
or its designee will review and make recommendations concerning Special
Events and racing activities at Golden Peak and their impacts on the portal
and congestion in the surrounding infrastructure.
(8.) Tier tr. In the event some or all of the Tier I techniques have been
implemented and congestion has still resulted at the portal which advensely
effects traflic or surrounding town infrastructure then VA will implement the
recommendations of the Assessment Committee or its designee in the
following ski season or Peak Period. In addition the following successive
management techniques will be implemented:
l. Special events will be moved in part from this portal to down valley
locations.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Listen to the update
provided by the Vail Associates representatives.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In December 1995, The VailTown
Councilapproved, on 2nd reading, Ordinance No. 24, Series of
1995, repealing and reenacting Chapter 1g.gg (Ski
Base/Recreation Zone District) of the Vail Municipal Code and
approving the Development Plan for the ski base. During the discussion
of the project, Vail Associates representatives expressed concern that if
there were not sufficient pre-sales of the spaces in the proposed structure,
the entire project may be delayed or canceled. The Town Council
members requested that V.A. keep them updated regarding the progress
of the parking spaces pre-sales.
2:35 P.M. 3. Overview of Organization, Functions and 1996 Priorities of Town
Susan Connelly of Vail Community Development Department.
2:00 P.M. 1.
2:15 P.M. 2.
David Corbin
Chris Ryman
3:35 P,M. 4.
Tom Moorhead
4:35 P.M. 5.
4:45 P.M. 6.
5:55 P.M. 7.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996
2:00 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
PEC/DRB Review.
Update Discussion of Pre-Sale Commitments for parking Spaces in
the Proposed Golden Peak Parking Structure.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: None, for information only.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Part of orientation for new Council.
Revisit Discussion of Alpine Garden Lease.
Information Update.
Council Reoorts.
Other.
6:00 P.M.8. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING STARTTIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)|||l
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, i/16/!,6, BEGtNNtNG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VA]L TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwlLL BE oN TUESDAY,1t2s,. ,6, BEGTNNTNG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwlLL BE oN TUESDAY, t/I6/96, BEG|NN|NG AT 7:30 p.M. tN Tov couNctL CHAMBERS.ilttttl
Sign language interpretalion available upon request with 24 hour notification. please calt 479-2114 voiceor 479-2356 TDD for inlormation.
C:\AGENDA.WSE
This packet contains all
material
r2tr9lgs
related to the
Town Council
approval of the
Golden Peak Ski Base
Redevelopment
Application.
Application Received : 5l 15 /95
TC worksessions: lll28l95
t2l5lgs
Evening Meetings : l2l 5195
tzl19l95
See next page for conditions of approval.
Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment
Gonditions of APProval
At the December 1g, 1995 Town Council meeting, the Town Council approved the Golden Peak
SkiBaseredevelopmentapplicationwiththefollowingconditions:
.,/ 2.
../ 1.
,/ 3.
Prior to the Town's issuance of any Building/Grading/Demolition Permits for the
ieOeuetopment, the applicant shalibe required to enter into an agreement with the
Town. This agreement will specify the obligations ol he Town of Vail and vail
G"o.i"t"r as-they relate to ine dotOen PeLk redevelopm_ent, i.e., transfer of
easements, detaili on cost sharing, establishment of the Golden Peak
Operational Management Plan Assessment Committe' etc'
The Town of Vail and vail Associates agree that the 148-space parking structure
is an integral component of this project, and that it will be constructed as an
element o-t tne eoiOen Peak Ski'Ba'se redevelopment. lt is also acknowledged
that the construction of the parking structure may begin in the 1997 construction
season. lf any Certificate oiOccu[ancy for the redevelopment is requested, and
the parking siructure is not complbted, the Town will request that the applicant
provide su-fiicient collatoral to insure its completion at a later date'
staff is directed to prepare a memorandum to the Design Review Board identifying
the PEC and Town Council's concerns with the project and requesting that the
DRB focus theil review on the following issues:
* The roof material used on the mechanical covering/architectural element
should be the same material as used on the remainder of the building roof
area. This covering should be mounted on posts so that it is 6"-'12" above
the flat roof surface.
- The aisle widths in the children's center parking lot will be reevaluated
by the Town of vail staff and the applicant's representatives in an effort to
piovide a sidewalk of acceptable width, including landscape screening and
reaining wall design. The final design is subject to review and approval by
the Design Review Board.
-Comprehensivesignprogramthatdetai|sbothonandoff-sitesignage.
. Building colors, materials and details
* Landscaping, site details and materials
* Design of the Mill creek circle plaza will be reviewed with regard to
increaled landscaping, screening of the telephone utility box, and final
design.
The final streetscapeiroadwayibus lane constluction designs must be reviewed
and approved by the Public works and community Development Departments
prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project.
.t 4.
'r
6.
'/s.
n8.
v$.
The sidewalk proposed on the east side of Vail Valley Drive' tlg sigt11llf]om the
Children's Center to the soc;er field, and a pedestrian connection to the Ford
Farf parxing lot shall not be considered to be a part of he Golden Peak
i"C"Gfopr-"nt ptans and witl not be constructed in coniunction with the.G.olden
peat imirovements. Additionally, the final solution for improving the existing
Manor Vail sidewalk witt Oe Oetayed until the realignment of Vail Valley Drive is
complete.
The Environmental lmpact Report must be revised/updated and approved by the
Town, including the Mill Creek Geological Hazard Analysis, prior to the issuance
of a Building Permit for the project.
The applicant will complete construction of the vail Trail extension from its current
termirirjs, bcated OeniirO the Children's Center, to the western edge of the Vail
Associates property prior to the issuance of a Temporary Cerilficate of Occupancy
foi tne Uisd todge ia'citity. The design of this trail must be reviewed and approved
by the Design Review Board.
The design of the seasonal tent, proposed to be located near the ski race course
finish arei, must be reviewed ani aiproveO by the Design Review Board prior to
its placement on the Property.
The Golden Peak operational Managernent Plan shall be amended as follows:
A. Section Vl (B) (DEVO/Local and Community Programs):
Tier ll. In the event that some or all ol the Tier I techniques have been
irnp|ementedandDEVosti||adverse|yimpactsporta|congestionthenthe
foliowing successive management effbrts will be undertaken in the next ski
season or Peak Period:
7.
B.Section ll (Managed Parking Structure):
Any reference to the number ol tier I parking spaces shall be changed
from 50 to 75.
DEVO will be relocated in part or in whole to other Vail Mountain
.-' /-r/leL ,,
.-( ff/du <t
oaolritq*tc(
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE.ENACTING CHAPTER 18.39, SKI
BASE/RECREATION DISTRICT OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code describes the Ski Base/Recreation
Zone District and
WHEREAS, Vail Associates, Inc. has submitted an application to amend Chapter 18.3g
()f the Vail Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town oi Vail has
recommended approval of the amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS' the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and
welfare to amend said Chapter of the Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1,
Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby repealed and re-enacted to read as follows:
18.39.010 Purpose.
The Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District is intended to provide for the base
facilities necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allow multi{amily residential dwellings as
a secondary use il certain criteria are met. ln addition, summer recreational uses and facilities
are encouraged to achieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and provide for efficient
use of the tacilities.
18.39.030 Permitted uses.
A. The following uses shall be permitted within the main base lodge building in the Golden
Peak Ski Base/Recreation District:
1. Ski lockers/employee locker rooms.
2. Ski schooland ski patrol facilities.
3. Lift ticket sales.
4. Tennis pro shop.
5. Ski repair, rental, sales and accessories.
6. Restaurant/bar/srrackbar/candysales.
ORDINANCE NO.2'I
Series of 1995
7. Sumnier seasonal recreational, cultural and educational programs and otfices.
8, Meeting rooms tor owner use and community-oriented organizations.
9. lnjury prevention and rehabilitation facilities for owners, use.
10. Basket rental
'l 1. Special community events.
B. Retail and meeting room space limitation.
1. Retail sales space in the first two floors shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen
. percent of the non-residential gross square tootage of the main base lodge
building. Under Section 18.39.030, retrail shall be delined as tennis pro shop,
candy sales, ski repair/rental sales, accessories and clothing, basket rental, ski
lockers and storage for the public.
2. Meeting rooms shall be limited to a maximum of ten percent of the non-residential
. gross square footage of the main building.
C. Multi-family dwelling units within the main base lodge building if the following
requirements are met:
1. The dwelling units shall be a secondary use within the main base lodge building if
they meet the following criteria:
a. No residential use on ground level.
b' Visual impacts such as surface parking for the dwelling units shall be
minimized by providing at least torty percent of the required parking within
the main base lodge building or in an attached parking structure.
c' The maximum gross residential floor area (GRFA) devoted to dwelling
units shall not exceed thirty percent of the total gross square footage of
the main base lodge building.
2. Before acting on multi-family dwelling units, the Planning and Environmental
commission shail consider the foilowing factors in regard thereto:
a. Relationship and impacts of the use on development objectives of the
town.
b. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
lacilities, utilities, schools, parks, and recreational facilities, and other
public facilities and public facilities needs.
c. Etfect upon tratfic, with particular relerence to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traftic llow and control. access
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area.
d. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
urrounding uses.
3. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the findings set forth in
Section 18.60.060 B before permitting multi{amily units within the main base
lodge buitding.
D. Permifted uses within the Children's Ski Schoolbuilding:
1. Year-round child care and children's ski school and appurtenant recreational
facilities and programs.
2. Children's ski school services and programs.
3. Community events and programs.
4. Summer recreational, cultural and educational programs.
E. The following uses shall be permitted outside the main base lodge and Children,s Ski
School buildings as shown on the approved development plan:
'1 . Ski trails, slopes and lifts;
r : 2. Snowmaking facilities;
I 3. Bus and skier dropotf;
4. Surface parking lot;
5. Ski racing facilities;
6. Public parks, tennis and voileybail courts, and praying fierds, praygrounds;
7. Water-treatment and storage lacilities buildings;
8. Mountain storage buildings;
9. Ski school activities;
10. Special community events;
11, Food and beverage service;
12. lndoor and outdoor ski storage.
18.39-050 Conditionaluses.
A' The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the Golden peak ski
Base/Recreation District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.60:
1. Recreation room/minor arcade.
2. Addition or expansion of storage buirdings for mountain equipment.
3. Sumr;er outdoor storage for mountain equipment.
4. Redevelopment of water storage extraction and treatment facilities.
5. Redevelopment of ski racing facilities.
6. Redevelopment of public parks, playgrounds.
7. Summer seasonal communig otfices and programs.
. 8. Additions or expansions of public or private parking structures or spaces.
9' Seasonal structures to accommodate athletic, cultural, or educational activities.
10. Redevelopment ot ski lifts and tows.
11. Food and beverage cart vending.
12. Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 1g.5g.310.
13. Type ilt EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060.
14. Type tV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070.
15. Public, private or quasi-public clubs.
18.39.070 Accessory Uses
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation
District:
A. Accessory uses customarily incidental to permitted and conditional uses and
. necessary for the operation thereof.
B. Home occupations, subject to the issuance of a home occupation pennit in
accordance with the provisions ol Sections 1g.5g.1go through 18.s8.190.
18.39.080 Location of business activity.
A. All offices and retail sales conducted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation
District shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building except for
approved special events and food and beverage vending.
18.39.090 Developmentplanrequired.
A. To ensure the unified development, the protection of the naturat environment. the
compatibility with the surrounding area and to assure that development in the
Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District will meet the intent of the district. a
development plan shall be required.
B. The proposed development plan shall be in accordance with Section 1g.g9.110
and shall be submitted by the developer to the zoning administrator, who shall
refer it to the Planning and Environmental Commission, which shall consider the
plan at a regurarly schedured meeting. A report of the pranning and
Envirc;rmental Commission stating its findings and recommendations shall be
transmitted to the town council for approval in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Section 19.66.060 of the Municipal Code.
C. The approved development plan shall be used as the principal guide for all
development within the Gorden peak ski Base/Recreation District.
D. Amendments to the approved development plan will be considered in accordance
with the provisions of Section 1g.40.100.
E. The development plan and any subsequent amendments thereto shall require the
approval of the design review board in accordance with the applicable provisions
of Chapter 18.54 of the Municipal Code prior to the commencement of site
preparation.
1 8.39.1 1 0 Development plan - Contents
The following information and materials shall be submitted with an application for a
proposed development plan. Certain submittal requirements may be waived or modified
by the Director ol the Department of Community Development if it is demonstrated that
the material to be waived or modified is not applicable to the review criteria, or that other
practical solutions have been reached.
A. Application lorm and filing fee.
B. A written statement describing the project including information on the nature of
the development proposed, proposed uses, and phasing plans.
C. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions of the
property to be included in the development plan, including the location ol
improvements, existing contours, naturar features, existing vegetation, water
courses, and perimeter property lines of the parcel.
D. A tifle report, including schedules A and B.
E. Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations.
etc.), if appticabte.
F. A complete zoning analysis of the existing and proposed development including a
square footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces, etc.
G. A site plan at a scale not smaller than 1, = 20', showing the location and
dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, all p1ncipal site
development features, vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems and
proposed contours and drainage plans.
H. Building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than
1/8" = 1 ', in sutficient detail to determine floor area, circulation, location of uses
and scale and appearance of the proposed development.
l. A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in retation to all
adjacent properties at a scale not smaller than 1', = S0,.
J. Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating the
visual impact of the proposed development on public and private property in the
vicinity ol the proposed development plan.
K. An architectural or massing model at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed
development in relationship to existing development on the site and on adjacent
parcels.
L. A landscape plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20,, showing existing landscape
features to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and other site
development features such as recreation tacilities, paths and trails, plazas,
walkways and water features.
M' An Environmental lmpact Report in accordance with chapter 19.56, unless
waived by Section 18.56.030.
N. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Director of the
Community Development Department.
With the exception of the model, four complete copies of the above information shall be
submitted at the time of the application. When a model is required, it shall be submitted
a minimum of two weeks prior to the first formal review of the planning and
Environmental commission. At the discretion of the Director of community
Development, reduced copies in 9.5" x 11,, format of all of the above information and
additional copies for distribution to the Planning and Environmental Commission and
Town Council may be required.
18.39.120 DevelcpmentStandards/Criteriaforevaluation.
The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed
development plan. lt shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the
proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria.
'l . Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and
orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding
neighborhood.
2. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to
produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding
neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole.
3. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to
preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for
access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed
uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing
open space and recreation areas.
4. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, etficient
and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development.
5' Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the
project's Environmental lmpact Report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating
measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan.
6. Compliance with The Vail Comprehensive Plan and other applicable plans.
18.39.130 Lot area.
The minimum lot or site area shall be forg acres of site area, at least one acre of which
shall be buildable area.
18.39.150 Setbacks.
In the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District, front, side, rear and stream setbacks
shall be as indicated on the approved development plan.
18.39.170 Height.
Up to sixty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be built to a height of
thirty-five feet, or less. No more than forty percent of the building (building coverage
area) may be higher than thirty-five feet, but not higher than forty teet. Towers, spires,
cupolas, chimneys, llagpoles, and simihr architectural features not useable as gross
residential flo;i area may extend above the height limit a distance of not more than
twenty-five percent of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet.
18.39.180 DensityControl.
Total density shall not exceed one dwelling unit per eight acres of site area.
18.39.190 Sitecoverage
site coverage shail be as shown on the approved deveropment pran,
18.39.210 Landscaping and site development.
l-andscaping requirements shall be as shown on the approved development plan. All
areas within the area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan not occupied by building,
ground level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped.
18.39.230 Parking Plan and program
Parking Plan and Management Program shall be as shown on and described in the
approved development plan.
Section 2.
lf any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not etfect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance;; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and.
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invalid.
Section 3.
The Town Council hereby linds, determines and declares that this ordinance rs necessary and
proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town ol Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the etfective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted' The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or
any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 5.
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, therelofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE lN FULL, this 5th day of December, 1995. A public hearing on this ordinance shallbe
held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, on the 19th day of
December, 1995, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
ATTEST:
INTRODUCED. READ.
PUBLISHED (IN FULL)
ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
(BY TITLE ONLY) THIS ' :rt' DAy OF ,'r. . ., ,,..t. , , 1995.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Holly McOutcheon, Town Clerk
L'ft /G("'v"/
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Holly'McCutcheon, Town Clerk
o
hnpvcr*^,tfu,
I'lr*( &/ u,rya-aflltz
ftrW ary$^
M?rh/^L
Golob",,- ?edrQ be{. ffrq7
Cw +24
MonDIti > V&t t-. Ukvfts
84Dn:D: [trt4LHfra- JAudT
uorLi G - o
Mnrnqr Vc,^{ Wosv*aJQ - dd r,uitn [\L 4W Wrl
WtaLiU r& W [{ru\\r tff\,]A fPL {o (.?
+^^ L."- wtr^,,., \I'^tU rudf 'b *oar*keil lx c*nphl-/ -
hob lr^Li* - fudsuta'lV al,rovkt fu \tt^l,t *h"t"l +LL4N& srwtl)
Ldrdlhrrne * Z '. prwn6 ttwc*r,*=-
tnx \ - vP*o<o
MoTrN'4YEtt- NP,r,lnB
?.M:, tnv ft?D
VolU: b- o
r rcol 4v c'lruvry ngvU(ylna
Pree(
'"o) fr
/'/* -'
/-nf2XPtt- tu-u*-.<-tt-',v;Nfaaa44,
* /haarov' l/o,'C Cpg; arctft-d,<aL *r4
ikqgq_sfrp? fueC
-\)k ,-;6ro,qr;j6ra/ & g;y'"ta{k>
- rztL ller&,pd ,ue ee- takb e{ rjL
b-{ eqv-q4o rwtL{drpcid ,? *oL
uAlr *;,/{/P- a&et 0*/ tr t''orp#' Ot ryt*^,!:( * swd dd ^i,kpr-r'okh4euu' r
'ftaL qf9 f*\-lQ fQZ .T taflo$
?77- *'e!6 b"fifr"r.e%fs t,t/\'/w6/
n++d. et e;,21g,/a(k r
F- 7bL (azief- ugdv)Q,r,or(L /*( Vtlr'{nW6y rrten/ o ,ur-(d*C'-d
eitt<, rtt-aC K .
DrSCogs^ij a{
4.,'*,A (trtlL- tro.'{= O;t+s*+pq6-@tW eF*k{i u**,i( 4r^&;-r;x&n de.t4 M, ,s wnus>A&A
a
- P[,(("G{[*
l;bt'E-*"w4o /ll rde*&"& €rce(
Ecp- 4 2s- Lo-{ /16{ tv4o& Y{L&e€trVr Z =lDaQ.-s,o*L fu - a ko . f: ;,;{d'oo( /4.*M/wda*.*A@
q.e
V";,e(l fe.;q L
P./'l(,b s;'bdu*'-
-,+'Lr+r-/pt4-o{4.f V,4 *ql{i fu
',Zir i lt TrZ q ed -^ m d 6b
lvtl fr**sLy' t
#.nl- ff.? *dtiri,W Uc't6rtEt
tl(?ov S r ft,
W-e,-4 C;JunQ 6n/ft;
QlWat ^--. @-dtlr9(''/i; 6,*'T - ;E*J an,u kL'(, Li+ffi, - e,u .w+C-, &os47.t? l{,e,a
,4'i,e,w- s ta.^(e b g q g{tv e{,! /r{
#rgl? qQ q C C, - c-( d'---,F4T,a't ( , q, {- (/o svrGr.c frrft=r-4,b{. /4,tA kffic wc6 arrrQatd6v'@c
:'f rec (u4 g
u@ tt/\ Tlnee
--eCgd@ldcc-.@t ../tE Q*** c<- f(it\t, - z
- e Cgo(r@*, ( c.- g /S/a4g d
fr"A atYt'e,r/: Wg"ukerii @au*e*
-c*tqffi[ ottft^ q(a/a"g @
pAC - fu oG + (fiL e{n,n rttta.'
,0 rSc.-€;*p^l g€. s, /'r4n+ ;)gP ry*{O ? C I,'t Q{, e-'vs; c eal-ott9i4,,Luta/.fr , ,
- ii;i-J,L -Jlbad i*s lq ,<-!,-
L.uile- z <9 re,
L h oqQ- 4@ & rc,e,5 * btz r-77,bpY. (o= Nad by hrrre4
rtar.r)<- -fis ft =
3
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
December 19, 1g9S
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held
the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building.
7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
on Tuesday, December 19, 1g95, in
The meeting was called to order at
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Sybill Navas, Mayor pro-Tem
Paul Johnston
Kevin Foley
MichaelJewett
Rob Ford
Peggy Osterfoss
TowN oFFlcrALs pRESENT: Robert w. Mclaurin, Town Managerpamela A. Brandmeyer, Assistant fown Manaoer
R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
Anne Wright on behalf of the Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Joel Heath of the Vail ValleyTourism & Convention,pylelu.encouraged the Town Council to nerp find alternative sitesfor volleyball courts, in light of the fact trit tre existing courts at Gotoen peak are proposedto be removed with the redevelopment.
Second on the agenda was.secfg reading of ordinance No. 24, series of 1995, an ordinancerepealing and reenacting Chapter 18.39 (Ski dase/Recreation Zone District) of the Vail Muni;ip;lcode and approving t6e,Devetopmenl Plan ior tre Golden peak ski Base,4g5 Vail ValleyDrive/Tract F, Vair Viilage sth Firing, and rract B, Vair Viilage ztn Firing.
'
Jim curnutte explained that the ordinance was the same as the council reviewed at their lastmeeting with the exceptiolof one change on page 5, paragraph D. staff recommended passageof this ordinance with this change.
Dave corbin on behalf of the applicant stated he had reviewed the change and had no objection tothat revision.
Jim Lamont representing the East Village Homeowners Association stated that the change met theirneeds.
sybill Navas made a motion to pass ordinance No. 24, series of 199s on second reading with asecond by Mike Jewett. A vote was taken and passed unanimously 6_0.
At this tim.e. Fred wyman, a resident of All seasons condominiums approached the podium andexpressed his concern with the parking. Bob Armour informed nim'inat that matter would beaddressed a litfle later in the meeiing. -
Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton initiated discussions regarding the Developer,s Agreement,including agreements on cost sharing, the transfer of easements, the establishment of aneighborhood assessment committee, dtc.
Bob Mclaurin talked about the realignment of Vail Valley Drive before any decision is to be madeon lhe Manor Vail pedestrian crosswalk.
Paul Johnston stated he thought the sidewalk along the west side of Vail Vailey Drive should beheated.
several neighboring residents and condominiums expressed their concerns about the following:- lighting of VailValley Drive and the pedestrian walkways' heating and definition (color) of sidewalks in the areas' maintenance of the area
Vniln'wn Cou||,il Evcnir|I lvkrtitu Mi,utcl t!,/t9r'rt
trfitn t ..nu!].t lr.1'tt ,uu,"" O ,,,rrn,O u^,,O ,u,n
O
'srr'd 'B euor'oJeu\ 'lu'cildde aql ro ilpqaq uo ruasard sE^ u'roaH uorg
'dn-1Jec slq paluasaJd oUnuJnC urlf pup peaqlooti{ ujol
sE/',\ rsenbor ururad osn,reuo*or"';nJ;r"t"'AiJflrn!:Jr#"tTii[T,:?,?i,1iljjifrr:?i,rl:
palscor aq or..qnrc c1lqnd-1senb" e rol r'ro||e o1 iluuad asn puoul'uob'r10 ;eao:dde c3d eq dnttecol uoro.u e peno:dde s,oquiaur lrcunog ur'noj
"qr
d'urr"",iirrrrioJi"* nuu, .g raquocao aql lv
e6es1;1 *e^ 'z rcors '? i.rd.:-l"r'",tT[n"##ifi:s?
';ffiiltt?"f:lffJ" g,Tii []pup prt oql uo palecot aq ol lculsto auoz I oroc telcrg.yruog eqr iil.,,q.n1c c;lqno-;senb,, e roj Molleol lrurad esn reuorpuo3 pono:dde c=Jn to dn-11ec 1;cuno5 ur*oi'e sp' epue'e aql uo r{ltlJ
.se^eN
rrrq,{s,{q puocos e qlyrn ,sa6pnp uorcer3 ," 3,l"tiff#l:""1,i::,::j j!["Tt?,::il"1,1*Y
'aleurolte * *i*r.d_pl:1.!3y,1!t atuuean,e;og.Ieprlog ,rolseC Irpm tsuoy! uerexsr sabpnf to lsrt srlr .se6pnp uolcot3 iercedi 1o guaurlulod-dv i,,ir bb^ epuaFe oql uo quoJ
puocos e qlrrtr ourpeer rs.ru uo,urro,3g";Tr1iffi%""'r'""r1;fr$l"j,'r";;;'l yrff':J^:llilf3
e-q1 rq perna4ar eq
'!M-sr!un.1.1,1 1-o ",o li,l,:..!l,!?ll#iYi?il,1?j.l13:iffill,lil,jr:il|*ro aurquloc ol lsanba: e leql arnsuo lJgr,r, guarupuer.ue fasodord ,q.iirpoC 0u;uo7 or.ll to 0g,Bt:eldeqg qll' ocu'pro'p ur ,uJad as1 1euo11;puo3 p lo acuenssr ilt oi tr"tqn, ,osn r'uo'lpuo'ro pallurad raqloue rol /v\oile o1 s1cu1si6 auo711 ero3 1"'creuuo3 pue I oJoc rao,au,uoc or* ulroou puocas oql a^oqe pol'urrxrro aq ot slun uollooyurocce.ro ou;re/u6ilurod ol epo3 6u;uo2 aqiro uo*ualur aql s! , sa^arraq 11e13 's1cu1sig auo.4 ll€Joc r'roreruur'oc fu" lerog rprc,oruu,oc or{lfo suorlcas asn rpuo!,puoc pue pourr.uraJaqr lo uo'ualur eqt tno fui-Bf oreq lrrvl pue epoc 6uruo7aqr urrilr/vl rcuelsrsuoc aleaJc [r^ '(gi oso--tzjet uo[3as ot tueurpueure pasodo.rd aql sraar JrEls
'uou;soddo rf !?'on suell[M uolreo pue.u.apsuy 6e.rg srog.ueu uolssru*lloc 6u1uue16'uollepuaurruocor oqr
Lo_1.^Br u! 7-f ijel0; u-o1ss1.uuro3 reru"*iorri.lJpup ouluuerd aq|epeurse'v\ llcunoc u/t^ol ol luaurpueuP pasodo.rd iqr lo tenolbo" puiu,'ud,j., ol uo[ou, e ,uorssncsrp
^qlDual
p rsllv .luaurpuaup paqrrcsep oloq:
?10
,ro,r"1rroj-i"G*uortnu3 pue 0uruueJ6aql ol poluasard luaupedeg lueudolenag ryunuuo3 tt"n lo u^irrq, 'suor ,/z roqula^oN uo
l?lt?l9l! par'p runpu?ou,,au uors'rurro" ,",r"*ro,in'r!'il3ldi,lrl3li:i1,:lT;"J gs3i,j,feuoz ll aroc lelcrsuru:?9.::.I^?r-"c_pp.rJiu^[rojeq1lo suoilcegiin'Drduproc pu' pa*ursd aL'lo uotluslut aql lno &r"^"j'."j o1 pul-epog orrfrz
."-qr
u,r.lril,{"-u"tri"ro",r""r" ol apeu aq plnoqsluorlpuotllP sltll sa^allaq llels 'Jooll puo-ces'aL[.uo^sesn'ro| prnb, ,l qctLtM leql o1 :elrurrs loottpuocos aql e^oqe Joaroql uo;1.rod,{ue ro 1;un uoll:L:_3yo"iri ro'ourrpi,np 6u.1s;xe ,iue saleuJurlaLlcr.t' asn {ue ro1 il*I.rad esn leuougpuo3 e fyrylloe.r r*rr .pnriiii oi (s) o90.rz.gr uorcosol opeur oq prnoLrs luau'rpuaue up leql .en-";'"q ,pls 'acuBulpro !,qi p.1ur..ro raqlnu e'loeg
'slcrrlslo auoz ll aroc lelcror.lruoc lr:. !..-"]oc lplcJarlruo3 ul rooll puocas eq1 enoqeroe.laql uo;yod rue ro lun uo;1epouruoc"e.,o [rn ourllaanp bulrrr" rtri riulleururro rol sarnpeco.rd/yrau quor 6u;11as 'u'n Jo u^^or aql ,o apoc i;9y11ry.;rffi"4;;;;r.Br uorpas ourpuaueacueutpro ue '966t lo saras'92'ory erue{prg;o .urpear lsrg eur;;'"pua6e aql uo prlr{r
uarel ss/r^ elo^ v .proJ.gou,tq puooas e qsprir,6upaeu.u,,, o.tloL?$",1r?ilfifrffiff",j#:suolllpuoc aql qll' uey6 lue'rdola^apou"lea6 ueplog:aq'a;orooe-ol pa^our seneg 111q{g.ueIlr' se Iejs ptnoLts 1r geql paarOe
?l^l?]rr_lrrfp euos layp lo^o/v\otl ,lo orec uo)t'lsEM e 'oN uollrpuoc u; u6;sap toi ou*reo'pu" {"^"p,. ra1uai s,ua:ptrq",i,lr 1q6noq1 ulqroc oABc
'paz,lln sq plnoc 6u1u6rs ctuorlcalo yo ed^l
"ro.-:.9-:.qi?l teql pue enug
^a11e4
gpl uo-uopse'uocpue cllr'Jl reuorppe lnoq' uJocuociraql pecron sun,u*nopuoi pr, .iripir.r 0upoqq6leu snouen
'auo Joll ot peppy eq saceds_97 geql palsenbet seLl vn .ue1d lueueoeueur leuoueredoreed uapro' aq1 10 uoivod arnlcnrls ourlr"o',iqi puaue or irriibrnoiiv], ,"q, pr's rnou,rv gog
eJe/v\ sueil or{ pu' paprnord sern ;enorddy lo suolrrpuoc pepuauuocar
"q, , ,ro"5"rTi,""rrg
o
PaulJohnston asked Mr. Heelan how many members he anticipated to be in this club. Mr.Heelan said approximately 400. Paul Johnson asked how Mi. Heelan anticipated thesemembers would access the club. Mr. Heelan replied by walking from the parking stntcture.Paul expressed his concerns that the club m6mberi would -be dropped off 5n HansonRanch Road, creating more traffic and congeslion in that area.
Michael Jewett asked why the ch.ange in plans for the use of this building f rom residentialand office space on the top two floors to the cunent plans, Mr, Heelan ..ia it *m fooLeainto and ihis was a needed seruice for Vail guests and that use seemed to make bettersense.
Jim Lamont voiced his concern regarding policy issues. He stated that staff was biasedagainst dwelling units as opposed io acc-ommodation units and commercial uses.
Bob Armour asked about the horizontal zoning and Tom Moorhead and Jim Curnutteexplained the same.
Paul Johnston made a motion to overturn the PEC approvalol a Conditional Use permit wirh asecond !y SyOitt Navas. A vote was taken and tne m6tion taited 2-4, with Kevin Fotey, Mich;JJewett, Rob Ford and Bob Armour oplosed.
Kevin Foley then made a motion to uphold the PEC approval of a Conditional Use permit
with the two staff conditions. MichaelJewett seconded the motion.
Jim Curnutte informed Councillhere were two additional PEC conditions which were thatthe applicant have only a public liquor license and that the Conditional Use permit runconcurrently wilh the other approvals thal were granted in April. Kevin Foley amended hismotion to also include these two additionalconditions and MichaelJewett seconded theamendment. A vote was taken and passed 4-2, with Paul Johnston and Sybill Navasopposed.
Paul Johnston wanted it noted for the record that Hanson Ranch Road is one way going
east.
Sixth on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob Mclaurin asked Council ifthey were willing to have an all day relreat on Tuesday, February 27. Council agreeO. eoUalso asked members of Councilto let Anne Wrighttnow if they were interested in attending
either the OAST meeting or the cML - Elected otficials' wo'rkshop.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourn at approximately 10:02 p.m.
t
ATTEST:
Mlnutss lakon by Anno Wlght on behatf of the Town Clsrk.
l'Nama! ol codsh Indlvldulls nho gaw publlc Input mly ba lmcqrete.)
Respectf ully submitted,
rt W. Armour,
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Vnil lirtr[ O'It|!il Uv',,nlrtg ti,t{oth! MlNr$ l2l9tt
-)rr / C ', ("r>z+re.i
ao rl r-,r-- *
J"'a"--
A-/;
f4/'-
rill||$-||0r[
PHONE (970) 476-s646
416 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE
vArL, coLoRADo 81657 FAX (970) 47&0301
December 19, 1995
VaiI Town Counci I
75 S. Frontage RoadVail, CO. 81657
Dear Town Counci I Members
Over the course of the last two years we have been involved in
discussions with Vai I Assocjates and the East Vi I lage Homeowners
Association regarding the Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski
Base,In genenal, those discussions have been productive andinformative. As the project is reaching its final stages ofappnoval, we are pleased with the overal I appearance of thebuilding. lt appears that it will blend both from a mountain andresidential standpo i nt.
In oun support of the project, one of the elements that we werepleased to see proposed, was an underground parking structure withsurface landscaping. This we felt would in general enhance the
appearance of the development and area. of recent days, however,
v/e are advised of discussion that the parking structune may not bebuilt or that fees may be considered payment in lieu of parking.
Please undenstand that a portion of our support for this project
was the benefit of underground rather than surface parking.
Although we can understand the desire to pre sell spaces to off-set construction costs, we do not favor the pay in lieu of parking
alternative. Funther, if the structure cannot be built, we wouldrequest that the space be restricted to green space only. This iswhat we anticipated our view conridor would consist of w'i th thelandscaping proposed for the structure area.
Vai I Town Counci I
Page 2
A second matter of concern is the signage issue. Although studiessuggest that the vehicular traffic impact may not increasesignificantly, there is no question that Vail Valley Dr. willrealize a noticeable increase in traffic. ufe ask that the VailTown council, in its discussions with Vail Associates, provide foradequate electronic signage at the Golden peak ski Base as wel I ason Frontage Road that would minimize unnecessary traffic flow onvail Valley Dr. In particular if no parking is available, carsshould be directed elsewhere prior to coming down the Blue cowChute.
we are optimistic that these issues will be addressed in the finalappnovals of the Development Plan for the Golden peak Ski Base.
Sincerely
'/'1 ,t,\-",/h4r/&ntu.Niels W. Johnsen, President
Rams Horn Condominium Association
NWJ/d lm
12-18-95 l!:51 Pil iRO}I .R I{41{SE}I-BP iIAI'lSE}{T0 l[3
Jut-t,tx R. llANsEN
a rrorrlY Al'LAw
11s245b tn 1
p.o, Fox IIIt.ltARt tcToN, t|.l.u{ots (|0 t I
fol.116t.{r.o
lrlor,l..-- A'( t' 3 t3-7 1 | 1
VIA FACSIMIIJE NO. 970-479-2T57
frGrbar 18, .1915
Town of Vail Council
Ceni-Lernen:
F.egarding the Golden Peak Redevelopnrerrt F1 an (1995) t:he
utrdersigned, as a long time owner (1965) in the A11 Seasons
Condorninium, r€inreet Ehe Council to:
L, T*ke whaEever acEian is required (d9ed re€lriction, zoningprohibitiorr) to eneure that Eurfaee Xlarkiag ie eliminated
now and prohibitcd in thc futurc on thc propoecd J.andocapcd
area6 of Goldea Peak;
2. Nots deLcr,e gcction 18.39.75 (Prohibitcct uces) unlcss otsher
cgde Eectisns clearly anit specifically prohibiE Ehe
enumerat ed ucesi a$d
3. Proviile a reauonable uinre uoEificaEiotr tre acljuirtiug owtler'ts
of any proposed change conEl(lered by the zoning
atlmlnlstrator under eec. 18.39.090 D ancl provltle a slnple
hearinE proceEg if Ehe ownert fi.le a $rriEEen objecEiofl to
une proposed change.
The undersigned enthusiastically endorses the Golclen Peak
Redevelolment Plan with tbe above chanEeE.
cc: ilim Lramont,AI1 $easonF
DeparEmenE
c : \wl>50\epc\vai1
Condominiumof Conununity Development
.Itr
OcrrvroDEc 2 o tgg$
December 12, 1995
y-', C ""--'-j
$' aa a-
aVt'"-,/.''
).r"l "'"--"-'f ,/'
bo6
Members of Town Council
The Town of Vail
l7 S. Frontage Road, West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Council Members:
As a long time owner at Manor Vail Lodge I would like to express my concern and displeasure at
the suggested closing of the existing pedestrian crossing from Manor Vail to Golden Peak.
This pedestrian crossing has b'een in existence for a number of years and has worked in the past.
My concems are:
1. People will not walk to the proposed new north or south crossings, but rather,
will climb across the berm and'Jaywalk" to the opposite side of the street.
2. Visibility from the new proposed crossings is no better than the visibility from the
existing crossings.
3. The road cannot be widened enough to eliminate the visibility problems.
Perhaps all of the concems, i.e., liability, visibility, etc., would be better served if the existing
crosswalk were made more visible with increased signage, and a painted crosswalk.
I hope that you will consider our opinions on this matter before voting on this project.
Sincerely,
Arlt , A'ay'Ay
Betty Biszantz
cc: Vail Associates, Inc. - David Corbin Fax: 970-845-2555
East Villaee Homeowners Association - Jim Lamont Fax: 970-827-5856
)'*-IEIAS IOWNHOT]SE NSOCIATION' Vail, Colondo
c/oRibWootca
37(tr Frrt Almcda Avrnnil500
f,larver, Coloado t0209
303-388-s53s q Frx 3fif-32t-3760
DcmDcr 15, 1995
lbrra Couacil
Toum of Vail
by FAX: ?9fHl?E--2ts7
bdier rnd Gcntlcnrca:
At pur mqting in lbocnber 19, l9g5, tt tr our understrrrdiug that p'
will give linat consid€ratim b vsil Associatg rodevcloprnert gn rdcoref{- !9 tnve erprerced oui gancrrl ltrypoft ftr ttris ptoces!, espedalty ftrc
n€edd llft and bars facitiries
Onc of the necdsd bale facilitiae is irnprovcrt parking facilitis,
ryfidly pa*ing. Wc rtongly $Dport the conrtrucriolr of rtrs
qd€cFotnd hcility u proposcd by VA. We aln rnurgly oppos rhs cmqr
of rcplrcing 0ds unaergud ftciuty wih a surfrpe peuie rol. rnil wuto
t€Dlace temir cwar with qn - not a good Bnitch. Iltr *routc most seriouslyirrFct thebuildingr and homix trr onr wcst, such rs Ramrhorn, but rrould
effect our view as well.
- We_will attempt b be at the mcetiog in lnro; but uraoted b e*pr€si
our vicws for ttrc ffiod. Ihank you for lour mnridcration. And Hapiy
Ilotidays!
Prcrident
ild IreA2zg S5, SI f,3c
$rr^u i RAnDa
(},!|c
Vta.
J.X. SE!fuih, M.D.
RJ, Hr*lin4lt["D,
WJ, Ste|t ! tttD.
Ervlr
Jt{. ltouUtr,Il'LD,
T.F- S.hLfdr it D.
A rtA:rs-V.&
iF" llomld, M.D.
Ltl. Urnl II.lLD.
D.P. Vu Ernannrm, M.D,
R.5. Wrrtorln, .Dt D.
Sl. Wririr,M.D.
CotsroEPHuc|am
,,r r.L... r|.D.
+artrrt
EIt rlrl€.M.D.
,hJS"rr
l8l W Mcrdor Dr.
SulN Numh.r 400
Vr il, CO t1657
(970) t76.t t0o
FAX (y,o 47e-9JJJ
SENT BY:Xerox Te lecopiU20 ; t z-t g-95 ; l 3 5gpil ;
fl7ss555+
3031?S215?;il 2
Ji x
Dec@bn 15, 199J
Doar Tounr Cormcil Rcprosotrtrtivos:
Reocutty, I wao informod oftho intotiol to rcoovete ths brso of Crold Perk
uount8itr. Althoug[ thero aro mmy b€o€6te from t]is project, I lm c@ocrtrod
lbout thc offost8 or the Gold Perk smd vollcybrll coutts In thin bttc, I
woild like to eonv€5/ Eomc of the sdvmtsges ofnovitrg tho ssod coutts to
mother looetion in VriL
Tho initirl booft ic for tho n rnhcrs of orr om@tnity. As e participant in lhe
King ofthe Mormtrin vollcJibdl toumrur@t I cen dheAb relrte to the
inportance ofvolleybdl to the Vrilloorls This ryort providos rn inFortfit
rccrertiurl outlo forr nnmrou r6sidafits. Locds rnd tieods oflocEls
sho\ryctm Bomc ofthc bcst vollcybdl tdeot in the *ate eiqh srrrmc(. illrny of
the rtbletes play three or four times per week all summcr lmgl
,
In eddilion, the Kiag of the Morntrin volleybdl tounarrrcot 1g tls lonEost
rurniry two "'"tr volleryballfounnncnt in ths Ntlte of Colomdo, Foltnrcot5t
ftte" yparq teams hrve frequently tn eled ftom CaliftEiq Now Moxico, and
Utah to coqrsto agrind solce ofthe bcst pleyere in the region. Tbe
avaihbihy of rand courts mEkos it posliblo to rttngt this high lwal oftelcnr
Withott the open divieion, thc King of the Moontain tournemeirt would not
€xis.
fUTs mrn vollglbdl dso oftrs sons fuhtre ur*aing potentiel ltir spct is
one ofthe most excititrg rnil fa*ing Fowitrg ryorts in thc nation- With the '
cmetnrc{im of a.sw ernd corutr, wo hrvo a gr6it oppoftrtrify to proiloto
frtsr€ wqrtr to thc Vril Vrllcy.
I-rcly, the ftr"cial iupfiogtions of uen' eesd vollEfrdl courts Dake s lot of
s€nre. The direct ud rosirhnl rwcnuo pos$ilitios sro tr@cndous. Oac can
riryty loolt towardr Arpear rr r primo exrqrlo ofhow lucrativo r vollqiball
tounsmcnt can boSr a gkitonal Withthe rssistNnoe ofl,hc VRD, Vril crn
hod snc ofthc prcmicr vollrybdl tounrmmts in tho colmty. Fruthunorg
tho cmsuction cosr Bppear to be rehtively inergcnsive, I hope tlat these
bene.ftg are conridcrcd druing yoru noa toum racctiug. Thenkr ftn all ofpur
eforts.
Sinccoty,
kiW**o
WISirs
RECEIVEO OEC lts
MailoaVrlr.Qocr
December 15, 1995
595 Ensr Vrur- Vlr-LEy DRtvE VNL, CoLoMDo 81657
970-476-50{n F^x 970-47 6-4982
800-950-8245
Mr. Robert McLaurin
THE TOWN OF VAIL
17 S. Frontage Road, West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Bob:
I have been getting a lot of comments opposed to the closing of the existing access
point from Manor Vail Lodge to Golden Peak. While there appear to be no
objections to the proposed new crosswalks, our owners are concerned about issues
of convenience and safety by physically obstructing the walk that has been in
existence for 30 years. It has been pointed out by some owners that the location
of the new crosswalks are no less dangerous than the existing walk. Common
sense dictates that people will cross the road at the point closest to where they want
to go. Even today, many people by-pass the existing walk ways and cross at
places they perceive to be more convenient. Ignoring this reality may result in a
greater liability potential rather than a lesser liability potential as some of the
members of the Town Council think.
In fact, there has been some as yet unorganized discussion about directing me to
ask the Association's legal counsel to intercede on the owners behalf because the
Homeorvner's Association is concerned that the Town of Vail is encumbering
Manor Vail Condominium Association with a greater liability risk.
I urge you and the Town Council to reconsider your decision relating specifically
to the closure of this area.
Thank you,
MANOR VAIL LODGE
Robert S. McCleary,
General Manager
PRnsaN"rED 8Y VILLAGE REsoRTs
N{ NAcIRs oF RNE CoNDo]fll:uM PRoPERTTEs
12/1411995 19:29 3U14875 FROM TI'E
UBERGS
PAGE 6I
nY
Docciltbcr 14,1995
Membcrs of Town Council
ThcTown of Vail
17 S. Frontagc Road, Wcst
Vail. C0 816i7
f)ear (lnncil I\lcmbcrs:
As a blr6 time owner of Manm Vail l.odge I would likc to cxDrEss mv shock and disolcasurc
!! the suggcsEd closing o{ thc cxisting pcdcsrian cmssing frrim Manin Vsil to Goldin pcak
this pcdcstian crossing has been in existcncc for many fcan and has workcd very well.
My conccrns are:
l. Pcoplo will not wallclg thc proposcd nsw north or south crossiilgs, but rathcg will clirr:li
across the bcrm and 'Jaywalk" to thc oilposite side of thc shrct, which wiII iause great ilangcr.
Z. Vsi'bitity lrom the ucw proposed crossings is no bener than rhe visibiliry from thc cxisting
crcs$ngs.
3. Thc road cannot be widened enough to eliminatc the visibiliry problcms.
Pcrhaps all of thc conccns, i.e.,.,liability, visibility, etc,, would bc bcrtcr scrvcd in a simplcmunncr.if thc cxis-ting.crosswalk wcrc-made m<ire visiblc with incrgascd signagc, noting"pedcstrian cmssiog" and a paintcd crosswalk.
I fecl vcry srongl;y about this issuc and do nor rhink rhat thc town of Vail morallv cr lesallv has tlrarighttoblockthe..:cessroourprivatewalkroourcondominiums-Ihopcthatyouwifiafr,ccwirh
oui utrong obj€ctirvrs to this maner lrforc vodng ort this 1,r.rjecr
'l&il Assciaas, Inc. - David Corbin
East Villagc Horncowncrs Association - Jim l-amont
Jackhul - Attomey
Sydncy J. Roscnberg
l2/L4/06 TgU 11:lE FA-X 8042852563
TAEFtror{ECX/288{Xn
F Xt00{86+2563
BRYAN EROITERS,
Jf]HN FIANDOLFH HUTtrHEsON
55I B FAIJOUTH STREET. $JFE qI2
REHT.r)ND. VIRGINN Ag'O
Decembrr 14,'1995
INCo l G ooz
,-r- c
P.O. BOX 123.
RtcHt/pltD, vA 28r!o9
UeDbers of Tosn Council
:fhe Town of Vail
17 S. Frontage Road, west
vai]- , CO 8t-657
Dear Counoil ueubers I
As a long time owner at ltanor vail fndge I would like to express
fr c"ttcerln and displeasure at the suggfg_sled ctos_ing of the existing
platstriatr cro"=fng fron ltanor tiiif to Golden Pealc. Tbis
iedestrian crossing-has been in existence for a nunber of years and
has worked in the past. lly concerns atre:
1- People will not walk to ttre proPosed new north or eouth- cro-tsings, but rather, wiff cfinn acrqss the beltu and
rjaytralkn to the opposite eide of the street.
2. visibility from tlre new pfoposed crossings is no better than
the visib-ility f,ron the existj"ng crossings.
3. The road cannot be widened enough to elininate ttre visibility
problens.
Perhaps aII of the concerns, i.e., liability, visibilityp €tc',
sould be better served if the existing crosswalk Itefe made Dore
visible with increasecl signage' and a painted crosswalk'
f hope that you will consiiler our opinions on this hatter before
voting on this project.
t,
rZ
John SandolPh
Rossie Carterunit 215-15-u
Eutcheson
Hutcheson
JRH/bb
cc: Vai.I lseociates, Inc-,
East villag:e llo[eosners
oavid eorbin
essociation, Jib Laugnt
sincerel
{"'-r- u,rrEc- r s-es FR r ee
I ""
I
Membcrsof Town Council
Ttre Town of Vail
Dccctnbcr 14, 1995
t? S. Frontagc (esd, Wcsr
\ldil. CO E1657
Pcar Council lvlcmbcrg:
Ar r lonS dno owner of Manor vail Lodgc I would liko to lxp/rEss- my lhoct art$ dt-splqsqm
at thc eurcertcd cbsrng of;hcl-iititte p"d"tnian crossing mdm Manor Vall to Goldcn PeaI.
hiipAffifi;;ilil; 1*'n in i*isrcn"" for many fean and hasworlrcd wry wcll.
My corrcems arc:
l. people wlll nor walk to thc pmpoaed ncw north or south cro-ssin.gs, but rather,-will climb
"o*.r ,r,o-L-r-;J;'jeilsli; i"iti. "i,p.-iL sidc of the smet, which will causc gruat danger'
2. Visibility from thc ncw proposed crossings is no better than thc vrsibility from thc cxisting
crossings.
3. Ttrc road cannor bc widened enough to eliminate the visibility prOblorns.
perhsps rll of the concerfls, i.e., liability, vtslblllty. etc.. would lrc.bettcrscrvcd in a simple
.an,rli if the existing crois,r"ik ware-made more visiblc with incrcased signagc' noting
' pedcstrlan ctessing" and a paintcd crosswalk-
I fccl very strongly abour rhis issuc and do not think that thc town of Vail morally or legally l*. t:
rip.hr to block rh-e icccss to our privatc walk to our condominiums. I hopo thatyou will aF0cwith
oir snong objections to tlis mafucr beforo voting on this projoct
f/,,; )"li) N^! f*",1 f" 'ae /'*/ *'f/l
f 61rLe /ao t -,1/ tfr. cook^t'. r/ .,-td
-',t
;^i' //,nr* *o'i) 6, tu/ft- l'l'n 4 r" //' /d'/e' n
61^lk ^ll 0':; /l'.{-rh','l o'hJ a c/ott tu^il L"J"(
/efrn, 6\ "r ''l :;;''- 'r/i L' fo' Your h ou' o nol
"//eu" f{'onn"l*r f // /ourt /rtdy, , .-
6(t^^ C" '!:'n\-/ // ftu
Town of Vail
Robert Iferbs
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATEz".r
& Vail Associatesr lnc.
y'Alpine Engineering, fnc.
fe ,!,o clQ
I
I
(
l
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
\
I
\
i
\
sIdJEcr: Gorden peak ski Base Faciliry Test pit
.i'Alpine Engineering, lnc., Koechlein consulting Engineers, and Vaili Associates will be_ conducting a test for existin! gro-*d*rt*
conditions at the Golden peaft sti Base Faciliti ilear the proposed
parking shlcture location.
This test involves the excavation of an area on the south side of the
old tennis court. This is only a test pit and not the commencement ofconstrnction'
,,, L*(* Q?c**n -i;
The excavation wifl-bdnat 9:00am on Tuesday, December l9th, andwill.be c,ompleted6itn ail equipment offsite by-5;00pm on
Wednesday, December 20th.
Anyong.with questions or concerns regarding this test pit may contact
Tg _"t {pine EneT:?nng, Inc. (g70D}64il[Monday ttuough
Friday, 8:00am - 5:00pm.
'f,aS o14*7:..--
I-c-
'tr.<2e99 rh Le
/\-{tee-gF
a5
be
r/
lwKe ''r-/ A'"q €e t/'
To: Torn Gormcil
Torn of VaiI-
l{y vife anil r are ovners of one of tbe earlier houses in vall
shich ve built i-n 1966- Ife are located at 992 ptarnlgan Road.
lJe have beeu caring members of the co,,,,,runity and truly love thLs
area having contributed to the bur.rdlng of the var.l varley chapel and.
the vaLl hospital aud have been supporters of various skl fund benefits.
Our concern in the redevelopment of Golden peak is that ve,and other
early builders, may be denied a golf course bus going west into tov':
Ire have children, graudchildren and friends shon se reguest and insist
the use of the bus system to decrease the congestion at Gord peak by car
drop-offs.
r recall the drive vhen it sas suggested that we have only east-bound
buses vith the tranportation center as the destioation. r spoke before
the Tosro council as thls:. imposed an ua.oecessary hardship on tbose of us
vho took the chance and invested in property long before Vailrs great
growth- To. trackfrom the trnsportation center rrith grandchildren and
other s ''lL children sith ski gear to either another local bus or salk
Is a bardship.
Tbankfully the above plan was never instigated and se frank-you
for a cottnnon sence solution.
lfos ye are asking for an eqrrally coumou sence decision to retaiu
the sest and east bound golf course bus routes. I can realize the
mess if nu'erous condo owners Dear the vail Golf club as sell as the
NordLc Center group and many home ocner& 4J.ong.tte _routg. statt.u6fug...-
their cars for drop-off and pick-up.
We and others on the golf couree use the bus and ve eupbasize again,
use co@)rr sense, Keep tbe golf course buses runni ng both ways.
Respectfully,
Ray & l{ary Kelley
476-22s9 (vail)
DEC-14-95 THU 12129 pil
CoR
VArL LoDGE FA)( N0, S4?64e82 P,0l
December 13, 1995
Meurbers of Town Council
Tbe Town of Vail
17 S. Fronage Road, Wost
Vail, CO t1657
Dear Council Membcrs:
As a tmg time oqmer at Manor Vail Iodge I would like to express my colrcem
ard displeasuro at the suggested closing of the existing podestrian crossing from
Manor Vail to C"olden Peak- This pedestsian crosing has been in.oristence for a
mulber of years and has worked in the past. My concerns are:
l. People will not walk to the proeosod ncw Dorth or south crossings, but
rather, will climb across tbc berm ad Jaywalk" to,the qrpositc side
of the strect.
2. Visibility from the new proposed crossings is no befier than tbe
visibility from tbe existing crossings.
3. The road qmnot be widened enough O climinate tbc visibility
Problems.
Perbaps all of the con@rns,.i.e., liability, visibility, etc., wo,trld be better served
if tbe existing cros$valk were made more visibte with increascd signage, and a
painbd crtsswalk.
I hopc that you will consider our opinions on this matter bEfore voti'g on this
project.
Sincercly, \
tlrr".*U t),llW
Dondd H. Srillams
595 E. Vail Valley Drive, #103
Vail, CO 81657
cc: Vail Associates, Inc. - David Corbin Fax: 9704452555
East Village Homeownerc Association - Jim Lamont Fax: 97U82J'5856
i c.. )*a--
A:A\g:--t'l : '-
I ne cervEo oEc z o t99$
v c-', C av'-^t)
S u-t t--
aV4-t.,/.''-
g'- /
"/,*
f atn
boB
December 12, L993 .
Members of Town Council
The Town of Vail
17 S. Frontage Road, West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Council Members:
As a long time owner at Manor Vail Lodge I would like to express my concem and displeasure at
the suggested closing of the existing pedestrian crossing from Manor Vail to Golden Peak.
This pedestrian crossing has been in existence for a number ofyears and has worked in the past.
My concerns are:
l. People will not walk to the proposed new north or south crossings, but rather,
will climb across the berm and "jaywalk" to the opposite side of the street.
2. Visibility from the new proposed crossings is no better tlan the visibility from the
existing crossings.
3. The road cannot be widened enough to eliminate the visibility problems.
Perhaps all of the concems, i.e., liability, visibility, etc., would be better served if the existing
crosswalk were made more visible with increased signage, and a painted crosswalk.
I hope that you will consider our opinions on this matter before voting on this project.
Sincerely,
Arl^o &a3auy
Betty Biszantz
cc: Vail Associates, Inc. - David Corbin Fax: 970-845-2555
East Village Homeowners Association - Jim Lamont Fax: 970-827-5856
- Pdbted by L,arry Grafel
From: Todd Oppenhel.merTo: Ilarrfr Graf e1Srrbj ect 3 grtowrne]- C updaCe
1: 18prn
CC: ttim CurD,rrt,te
Here l.s some updat,ed info onI spoke wict.. Da\r€ yoder wl'o tstr€
hag
costss of El-e Che l,roposed enortrme I C syBtsetn.been desLgninE chese cl.l.ngfs for abouts 20lrearg .
lFhe operatingt cosgs in ghe ].asE E-mai1 are c].os€ buts Lrere ig gome mored6t'al_1ed l_nfo.
24 bours a day. Mo€ts, of Eh.l.Btstr€ I)avemenC grarm and at. fulf.
fo11ow.
A comrn6rc1a1 gffscem 6uch a.s cltLs tdou].d runtsime vrou].d be at- about' 509 capacl.t'y to ke€pcapacl.ty on1y duritag and a.f t'€r eacb stsorm-
AE capacl.Cy Dawe g'ave me a ru1e of tttutrib tso
90 .1L per X-OO sf p€r Lrour
He flg"ures abouc 3O trrs/week for 18 rreekg at' fu]'l. capacl.tsf/. lfha t' leawes 138lrre/week ac 5Ot capacl.cy ($0.O6l1OOaf /ttrl
?he maur for clal.s 5ooo6f sj'Bcem works our tso abour .iiilE,dta.r lzear. Daverl-so polnted. outs che imporganca of J.nsca]-].l.ng and hEa-T5li-torm gewerg 3'olaandle tsh€ me].t' \^raCer. Tl. Ls wL1]. add co tl.r.e owera]"]. cosE of t,he project.
+ lo^h*48.( -{==.c x s0M "( .d?o,op -g 4Z
3
I^ -lc,rT'
=
.A+ l'4zp Uo.ts
f qo,r*
-n \mr Y/2ala>Losr :
@ eof z, o-+ st^{ f ffilnf; tt++,uo
fa+*o
4,*,A-'zzzr
f4\g fumunSut Y a,o,s,ofO
Page: 1
- Printed bv Jim Curnut rz/ Lz/ Ya 3: 3Bpm
From: Todd Oppenhe j-mer
To: I,arry Graf el-
sub_i ect: WD snowlnelt
:::NOT'E::::E--E:E:-E:E12 / L2 / 9 s-]-2 | 36palr*
CC: .tim Curnutte
Here is some info on ttre vaia valley
Drive snowroelt system proposal . My
feeling ttre most logrical place for a
boile-r i.s An the mechanical room of the
eold peak parking structule. It makes
for somewtrat of a l-ong Eun for ttrepipes but there would be gas ser\,.ice
available and probably elrough room to
place the unit. ottrerwise r^re'd be
looking at an outdoor iDstallation
somewtrere l)ear Gore Creek.
T} e lenqth of tLre sidel.talk (excaudingl
vAC and Galatyn Lodqe) is about 5OOr-
At a width of 1Or that makes aborrt 5OO0
sf. The mater.iaa would be concrete
unit pavers In'llich cost a little more to
treat.
I tra\./e seen 2 tr)rices lately on srrowmelt
systems. These figtlres are for the
mectranical systems only and do not
inc]'Lrde the pa\,'ement. Breckenridge is
l- eating some irrtersections for S15lsf
and Rolrinson qfave rus 916/sf on Seibert
Circle. Desiq|n fees rurr about 1Ot of
installation costs.
I'or this project, rrith the lonq :rur| of
insulated pipe before qetting to ttre
.sidewa1k I would add at least 1Og to
the Seibert circle Price.
sooo sf @ sa-7.60,/sf - gaa, ooo
10* desiqn fees a,AOO
Total mecharrical S96, BOO
operatirrg costs .run between 51.60 and
92.25 per sf pe]r year based
rudimentary fig|ures I Irut together. I
ltotlld.use the trig*r€r fiqure to allow
ror llhe. conc unit pa\,'ers and the longpipe runs.
5OOO sf @ 92.25/sf - 911'25O lrer )'ear
r }- a\.re not yet treard t)ack fr<tm Dave
Yoder on the info t} at tre vras putj-ngl
toqether so . I dorr I t ha\/e any f igfures on
maintenaltce cost. It should Lre alrlrmore
than maintaining the boiler unit on any
buildirrq| heat irrql system.
D:da.
I ./',
iG-1 ,DRAFT
faurn CoD^d t
\Nur[SesSru]r
&vlq6
TL OL
TOV / VA COST-SHARING OF OFF'SITE IMPROVEMENTS
l. Improvements to Vail Valley Drive - west side only
The Town and Vail Associates have agreed to a cost-sharing at a ratio of 80:20 to cover all
improvements to the west side of Vail Valley Drive, as indicated on the approved Streetscape
Improvement PIan.
2. Steetscape improvements in front of ttre Gallitin
The Town will pay 100% of the costs associated with improvements necessary at the Gallitin
property.
3. Improvements to Vail Valley Drive - east side onb'
The of Vail will be responsible for 100% of the costs associated with improvements associated
with the east side of Vail Valley Drive.
4. Pedestrian path located behind the Tivoli Lodge
The Town of Vail will pay 100% of the costs associated with the construction of a new asphalt
path behind the Tivoli Lodge connecting the existing path with the new Vail Valley lhive
sidewalk.
Vail Assooiates will be responsible for 100% of the costs associated with the redesign of the
Manor Vail enty including new sidewalks, driveway and landscaping.
7. Vail Valley Driverealignment
The Town and Vail Associates will split the costs associated with the Vail Valley Drive
realignment in front of the Manor Vail property at a ratio of 80:20.
I
t4.h-
al^
"r_14 _
- rcL
u6tqrP)
5. Improvements on the Golden Peak property
Vail Associates will be responsible for 100% of the costs associated with all improvement " t Nt'lO
located on the Golden Peak property and the parcel commonly referred to as parcel no. 2, i.e. bus luT , rA
stoprelocation, Children's Centerparkinglotredesign, etc. y H
6. Manor Vail enty redesign
bo lzo
bl--
f:\weryone\jirr\pcodshar.d(X
8. Streetscape improvements to the Soccer Field
The Town of Vail will be responsible for 100% of the costs associated with the creation of
sfieetscape improvements from the Children's Center to the Soccer Field. However, Vail
Associates has agreed in principal to work with the Town of Vail to accomplish the new sidewalk
(including financial contributions) from the Children's Center to the Soccer Field. VA expressed
concern regarding a commitnent to the Soccer Field parking lot in the future'
9. Ford Park improvements
If immediate improvements are necessary, the Town of Vail will be responsible for 100% of the
costs associated with those improvements, however, VA commits in principal to work with the
Town to accomplish those improvements (including financially), with the exception of sipage
that may need to be installed immediately, Vail Associates will pay 100% of the cost of signs.
'3,.xq,t2
A"k
f :\everyone\jim\gpco$shar. d04
REVTSED 01.02.95
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
December 5, 1995
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail rown council was held on Tuesday, December 5, 1g95, in
the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. the meeting was called to order at
7:35 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:Bob Armour, Mayor
Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-Tem
Peggy Osterfoss
PaulJohnston
Kevin Foley
MichaelJewett
Rob Ford
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Robert W. Mclaurin, Town Manager
R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
First item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Rick Sackbauer of the Vail Valley
Consolidated Water Diskict congratulated new council members on their recent
appointments and presented a brief update on district projects which included: efforts to
consolidate the water district and sanitation district through an election process in May,
1996; progress on employee housing; Eagle Park Reservoir project and completion of
the interconnect. Mr. Sackbaur informed Council members he would come in after first
of the year with a more detailed update and thanked Council for their participation.
The second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda which consisted of approval
of the Minutes forthe meetings of NovemberT and 21, 1995.
Mayor Armour read the Consent Agenda in full. Sybill moved to approve the Consent
Agenda with a second by Kevin. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Thid on the agenda was ordinance No. 24, series of 1995, first reading of an
ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 18.39 (SkiBase/Recreation Zone District)
of the Vail Municipal Code and approving the Development Plan for the Gotden Peak
Ski Base, 485 VailValley Drive/Tract F, VailVillage Sth Filing, and Tract B, VailVillage
7th Filing. Applicant VailAssociates, Inc., was represented by David corbin. Mayor
Armour read the title in full. Town of Vail planners Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton
reviewed the application, plans for the redevelopment of the Golden peak ski Base,
and work sessions that had been held with the PEC and the Town Council regarding
the application. (For a complete analysis of the proposal, please refer to the November
27 , 1995 staff memorandum to the PEC, distributed to the council on November 29,
1995.) lt was further explained that staff recommended approval of Ordinance No. 24,
Series of 1995, and conditional approval of the Development Plan. Jim Curnutte stated
the purpose of the ordinance was to amend the text of the Ski Base Recreation Zone
District. sybill moved to approve ordinance No. 24, series of 1gg5 on first reading, and
the motion was seconded by Rob Ford. A vote was taken and approved unanimously,
7-0.
Discussion then centered around the proposed development plan and included: the
proposed new base lodge, the building of a 148-space parking structure, lift upgrades
and other on-site improvements, including a skier drop-off lot and a new children's
center parking lot. Council members reviewed a list of conditions attached to the
development plan from Community Development as modified by the PEC. Dave Corbin,
V,J I* C*"1U"i? n hrIt,,t- |2/05/q5
\
st'l(;o/u.rmbfwbq t*a -t ra
aql uo pesEq sBrv\ le^oJdde c3d aql pue 'gg/01/0 ! uo epeul serv\ cad eql Aq le^oJddE
uolleJellB JolJaua uv 'uotstcap leql papacald guc aql qurvl suotssss IJow\ aeJLll leLll
pue '6utM leuotleulalul aLll a^oldde ol0-g pelo^ BUO eLll g6llllt uo leql pauteldxa
pue lcafoJd eqlburpunolns fuolsti.l aql pel arnal uesplnu) i(puy,reuueld llen
lo un/\ol 'a^tJO laarC eloe 'f VLI F palecol 'l!En le e6pol aqg le 6ur11 leuo[euJelul
aql anordde ol uotstcap BUO e;o leadde ue se^ epuabe aql uo '/ .oN uall
'sJaquleu ltcunoc
|1e Aq penoldde sern pue uoqepuauuocal gels alll apnput ol uotlouJ Jaq papuoule
Od '0-Z '{lsnourrueun passed pue ualel sem alol e ,uorlor.u aql papuoces ssneN
llrqrg 'e6a;rnud lercads e elEeJc lou plp pue euailJc ecueue^ leeul ptp lsenba: aq1
leql lceJ aql uo paseq uotstsap s,c3d eql ujnua^o ol ssoralso r06a6 {q apeu servr
uotlout v 'Jora ueulnq porc puB auJog 'J1/\ Jo ro^el ur a10ds lauJv laeqcly\ ,luoprsol
lrBn'uorsrcap 33d eql ulnue^o ol uo[eJaptsuoc s,lrcunoc eq1 palsanbar A|;n;icadsar
auJo8 'J[/I 'rcpqles luo4 aql olur lueuqceorcue lool g't e pasnec peq JoJJa eql puE
.ro:.la our^aruns E ol anp lceqles aq1 palsanbal peq eql peure;dxa auJog qog ,1uec;1ddy
'apog buruoz aLll r.lllm lualstsuocut a6a;rnud lelcads;o 1uel6 e ul llnsal plno/v\ ecueuenaql;o 6ul1uer0 aq1 leq} 1a1 '[uap o] uorlor,x eq] Jo Jo^e] ur 6uqon sJoqurau eq1 paureldxa
a6:oag 'lsanbar ecuelre^ lceqlas luor; pesodo:d eq1 Auap o1 (6urluassro lalJoyr'pue
:nou.r.ry) z-g Jo olo^ sJaqulaul uorssltur.iloc ar]l pue burlaau c3d 966l ,/z Jaqtua^oN
eql pue leadde aql Jo punoJblceq eq1 pa/v\er^er Jaqlnu a6roe9 rauueld 1ie4;o ur,noj
'apog ledorunyl
llen lo u/r^or srll jo '020'zg'g t uo[cas o1 luensrnd ,lsanbe: acueuB^ rcpqlas luo{at{l Jo letuep s,uorsstruruoc lelueuuoJt^u3 pue 6utuue14 aq1 our;eaddB sE/v\ "CUl U61Se[
o)|u Jo pJaurerg r11e5 Aq paluasa:dar 'auJog qog '1uel1addB oLll .peou rcruurrruurxc zegzluorsr^rpqns s/r^opean rcnJqsuur 'g lo-1 uo uo[cnJlsuoc Japun ,{lluerrncacuaplsal eql JoJ pasodo.rd acueue^ reeqlas 1uo.rJ palsanber aq1 ruap ol uorsrcep
s,uolsslr.lruoc leluauluoJr^u3 pup 6uruue16 aq110 leedde ue se^^ epuaoe aq uo-qyrg
'g-2 'I;snoulueun passed pue ue1e1 se/v\ alol V .Uyvtaf
ally! ulo4 puoces e qlurn ,rfiuoqpy oursuacrl lecol aql uo Icuecen aLll llu ol urdeqSptneg lurodde ol pa^ou 1lrqIg 's1o11eq eql perllel uoaqeuCcy!,ttroH puipernqur.'f[
era/v\ slolleg 'uoslM raneg 'uerurleqc raulro, Jo uo[eufisar ar.{l Aq paleeic iroiiri.ibauo Jol sluecrldde eJa/r^ rallPM r.ua1.pue 'uollesn euag ,urdeqc'e^eo ,aqr"arluoqpy Bursuacrl rBco'r Jo luaulurodde
"q1
serrr
"puaoi aql uo s^rJ Jeqrunu ulall
oro^ v . se^e N | ilq^s,{q p uocas B qr!/v\, uqnh1jfT,"#fi::l lilj,ffi ffi.lifit ;::'2661 'reqruenop errdxe ol ruJal 'ssolalso .y lareoreyl Jo urel pe:rdxaun
"w "i"ia,uoiol Jeqruau ltcunoC e 6unca;a 1o esodnd eql JoJ uotpel3 lercadg e JoJ elep eq1 6u;gesuorlnlosau e ,9661Jo sauos ,/e.oN uornlosau sem epueOebql uo uail quno; aql
'9661, Jo satJes 'gZ ecueutpJg uo Ourpearpuoces eql Jo au[ eq1 le ;enordde s,1rcuno3 01 lcahns aq plno^/\ ueio fireuoolinapaq1 pea:6e sJaquau lcunoS 'suJecuoc.leq passe.rdxa puE suollsanb p"1.ensapuou Acuel 'lusprsal lrBn 'sJsu/vro rtyado.rd lenpinrpu; aq11o ,{1g1,qrsr.ilre, ",rt;illecueurpio ,{q teq pue slle/v\aprs urElurBr.u lou seop srJoM cllqnd lBrll lrcunoc pourJojurpeaqrool\l uJo|BAJe ALll JOJ le^ouJal &\ous uo paluauruloc ,uorle|cossv unrurr.uopuocuJoqsueu aql 6urluasardar 'ue611;r6 auero .slle/v\aprs Mgu pasodo.rd io ""u"u"iu;",i:o1 e;qrsuodsal eq plno/v\ or.lM Jo uo[ecrluelc Jo] parse ,uor]e!3ossv srauMoauoH
abeJlrTl lseil aql Ouuuasardar 'luoruer ulrf .sluouanordr.ur adecs 1i"r1, p"roJorj
Jo acueualureu pue ouueqs lsoc 'sluauranojdrur adecs laa4s papnlcur uorssncsrp
1o scJdol leuoflppv 'l! pllng lou salercossv llen plnoqs uaddeq plno/vlleq/v\ pue ernpnrls6ut4red pasodo.td aq1 6ulpleOaJ panulluoc uorssncsrc ';enordde alqrssod.ro; 6urlaeu.r6uru-ana rrcunoc 6L Jaqt,,aoec aqr ol 1qOno.rq aq uorlelado sr uo rrelop alou pa1sa06nspue palecrldrxoc aJoM sanssr 6ur1.red palels ep1 .pouad reart onq E JaAo u1 paseqd
aq rlqrssod prno^ ernpn.rls 6u11.red eql l'r.il paure;dxa ,1uecr;dde aq1 burluesalda.r
criteria for exterior alterations as well as an agreement which the Town had executed
with the Lodge relating to accommodation units and conference area within the Village.
Attorney, Jay Peterson represented the applicant, Lodge Properties, Inc., explained he
was there to request the 1983 DRB decision be upheld. Mayor Armour requested Mr'
Peterson and other lawyers present speak after the presentation by the applicant.
Applicant, Lodge Properties, lnc., represented by Greg Christian, distributed the design
of the proposed International Wng, and presented the proposed change of 1983,
adding 19 rooms. Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead explained that 1983 decisions were
still in effect. He further stated that any changes or modification to the original approved
application would have to be reviewed by the DRB. Ann Frick, on behalf of Lou Ann
Wells, adjacent property owner, that statutory procedures were not adhered to, and that
the 1983 agreement was illegal. Architect, Lynn Fritzlen, stated inappropriate procedure
was followed and that relying on a 83 planning approval was inappropriate after 12
years, Peggy Osterfoss asked what the time line was for approval. Tom Moorhead
informed her that in 1983 there was no time line set forth on exterior alterations, but
since that date there has been a two year time limit put into effect. Those opposed to
the approval of the lnternational Wing who gave input included: Attorney, Art Abplanalp,
representing owners of Unit #527 , Mr. & Mrs. Saltz, as well as three other units. Mr.
Abplanalp presented a map which he said depicted the proposed sight barriers of
certain private condominium ownerb and stated that Rick Rosen represented the
Cabinas, also adjacent property owners. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village
Homeowners Association, requestid council members take into consideration a new
opportunity, and requested this pr6ject be withdrawn. Jay Peterson, representing the
applicant, Lodge properties, Inc. addressed concerns and answered questions. Mike
Arnett, Design Review Board Chairman, was on hand to answer questions, as was Jack
Zehren, architect for the project. Peggy moved to uphold the DRB approval of the
project with the stipulation that additional staff-approved modifications be made to the
plan to improve sight and sound barriers on the building's west side. Kevin Foley
seconded the motion. A vote was taken and passed, 6-1, Mike Jewitt voting in
opposition.
Item No. B. On the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob asked council
members to check their calendars in order to meet for a special work session on
Tuesday, February 13, and reminded them of the Town of Vail's Christmas party at the
Marriott on Friday night.
Mayor Armour informed those present of his concern regarding raising the speed limit
to 75 mph and asked that staff research the issue and any possible alternatives. Bob
Mclaurin said he would discuss it with the new Police Chief.
Other topics of discussion included: the shortage of bus drivers and overcrowding; the
need for a voice mail system for council members.
There being no further business, a motion was made by Paul Johnston to adjourn, with
a s.econd from Kevin Foley at approximately 11:10 P.M.
(Names of cerlain individuals who gave public lnput may be inaccurate )
v
lly submitted,
W. Armour,
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
tl,J I* Co,uuJ t"*an W2 Tli"J$ t2105/q5
" tlfinoi*--
-5yL,'C ,r"*rr,-{LA"f fr*&-ot124ro-t3"C4
^ '1 f7ute al fel^ecPc e(e^
h - J", C t/aU*/ bn,h o
*, il"d'f 1-de6;621
"{4' c | *! r c.,odp v*% t'a*; {; -;Si,.rp-a X&,'c'* *r*J"-$
e-.<,'G -\J aK CyJ^L ,C4r4)d"o-eoK CuJ.L ,(o r
-_ te0ist4-o(f?pre€' /PCai"(atdastg:.;
(,\
tlt
Chapter 18.39
GOLDEN PEAK SKI BASEiRECREATION DISTRICT
Sections:
18.39.010 Purpose.
18.39.030 Permitteduses.
18.39.050 Conditional uses.
18.39.070 Accessory uses.ffi
18.39.080 Location of business activity.
18.39.090 Development plan required.
18.39.110 Developmentplan - Contents.
18.39.120 D€ign Development Standards / Griteria for evaluation.
18.39.130 Lot area.
18.39.150 Setbacks.
18.39.170 Height.
18.39.180 Densitycontrol.
18.39.190 Site coverage.
18.39.210 Landscaping and site development.
18.39.230 Parking.
18.39.010 Purpose.
The Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District is intended to provide for the base
lacilities necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allow multi-famiry residential dwellings as
a secondary use if certain criteria are met. In addition, summer recreational uses and facilities
'are encouraged to achieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and provide for efficient
use of the facilities. (Ord.38 (1983) $ 1.)
18.39.030 Permin€d uses.A. The following uses shall be permitted within the main base lodge building in the Golden
Peak Ski Base/Recreation District:
'1 . Ski lockers/employee locker rooms.2. Ski school and ski patrolfacilities.
3. Lift ticket sales.4. Tennis pro shop.5. Ski repair, rental, sales and accessories.6. Restaurant/bar/snackbar/candysales.7. Summer seasonal :FownofVaifrecreational, cultural and educational programs
and offices.8. Meeting rooms for owner use and community-oriented organizations.
9. Injury prevention and rehabilitation facilities lor owners' use.
10. Basket rental11. Special community events.
B. Retailand meeting room space limitation.1. Retail sales space, , in the first two
floors shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen percent of the non-residential gross
square footage of the main base lodge building. Under Section 18.39.030, retail
shall be defined as tennis pro shop, candy sales, ski repair/rental sales, and
accessories and clothing, and basket rental, ski lockers and storage for the
publlc.
2. Meeting rooms shall be limited to a maximum of five ten percent of the non-
residential gross square footage of the main building.
C. Multi-family dwelling units within the main base lodge building if the following
requirements are met:1. The dwelling units shall be a secondary use within the main base lodge buibing if
they meet the following criteria:
a. No residential use on ground level.
b. Visual impacts such as surlace parking for the dwelling units shall be
minimized by providing at least forty percent of the required parking within
the main base lodge building or in an attached parking structure.
c. The maximum gross residential floor area (GRFA) devoted to dwelling units
shall not exceed thirty percent of the total gross square footage of
the main stnreture base lodge building.2. Before acting on multi-family dwelling units, the Planning and Environmental
Commission shall consider the following factors in regard thereto:
a. Relationship and impacts of the use on development objectives of
the town.
b. Etfect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools, parks, and recreational facilities, and other public
facilities and public lacilities needs.
c. Etfect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area.
d. Etfect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.3. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the findings set lorth in
Section 18.60.060 B before permitting multi-family units within the main base
lodge building.
D. Permitted uses within the*eeendary Children's Ski School building:
1. Year-round child care and children's ski school and appurtenant recreational
facilities and programs.2. Children's ski school services and programs.
3. Community events and programs.
4. Summer recreational, cultural and educational programs.
E. The following uses shall be permitted outside the main buildif,g base lodge and
Children's Skl School buildings as shown on the approved development plan:
1. Ski trails, slopes and lifts;
2. Snowmaking facilities;3. Bus and skier dropoff;4. Surface parking lot;5. Ski racing facilities;6. Public parks, tennis and volleyball courts, and playing fields, playgrounds;
7. Water-treatment and storage facilities buildings;8. Mountain storage buildings;9. Skischoolactivities;10. Special community events;11. Food and beverage service;12, Indoor and outdoor ski storage.
(Ord.28 (1988) S 1: Ord.6 (1988) S'l: Ord.38 (1988) S 1.
18.39.050 Conditionaluses.A. The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the Golden Peak Ski
Base/Recreation District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60:1. Recreation room/minor arcade.2. Addition or expansion of storage buildings for mountain equipment'
3. Summer outdoor storage for mountain equipment.4. Redevelopment of water storage extraction and treatment facilities.
5. Redevelopment of ski racing facilities.
6. Redevelopment of public parks, playgrounds.
7. Summer seasonal community offices and programs.
8. Additions or expansions of public or private parking structures or spaces.
.
9. Seasonal structures to accommodate athletic, cultural, or educational activities.
10. Redevelooment of ski lifts and tows.11. Food and beverage cart vending.12. Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 18.58,310.
13. Type lll EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060;14. Type lV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070.
15. Public, prlvate or quasi-public clubs.
ffiie*
io'*
proposah
18.39.070 Accessory Uses
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation
District:A. Accessory uses customarily incidental to permitted and conditional uses and
necessary for the operation thereof.B. Home occupations, subject to the issuance of a home occupation permit in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. (Ord.
38 (1e83) S 1.)
ffi
iens
ffi
7: Any ether use not epeeifieally permited or eonditional in this zone dbtriet:
fefd*efl€8+F+)
18.39.080 Location of business activity.A. All offices and retail sales conducted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation
District shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building except for
approved special events and food and beverage vending'
(Ord. 21 (1986) S 2: Ord. 38 (1983) S 1.)
18.39.090 Developmentplanrequired.A. To ensure the unified development, the protection of the natural environment, the
compatibility with the surrounding area and to assure that development in the
Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District will meet the intent of the district, a
development plan shall be required.B. The proposed development plan shall be in accordance with Section 18.39.1 1 0
and shall be submitted by the developer to the zoning administrator, who shall
refer it to the Planning and Environmental Commission, which shall consider the
plan at a regularly scheduled meeting. A report of the Planning and
Environmental Commission stating its findings and recommendations shall be
transmitted to the town council for approval in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code.
C. The approved development plan shall be used as the principal guide for all
development within the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District.
D. Amendments to the approved development plan which do not+hangeits
st htafiee alter the basic intent and character of the approved development
plan may be approved by the zoning administrator or by the Planning and
Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing in accordance
with the provisions of Section 18.66.060.
E. gaenpnase+tne aeproved The development plan and any subsequent
amendments thereto shall require the approval of the design review board in
accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 18.54 of the Municipal Code
prior to the commencement of site preparation.
(ord. 38 (1e83) $ 1.)
. 1 8.39.1 10 Development Plan - Contents
preeose@tie+aelitie*
hndsrue€reas:
strueture(sF1: A massing model gf
flreriage|ine(+otsr€€'fs
1: Existing ard proposed eontours; after grading and site development;
€f€€fr
fifty feet; showing existing landseape featHres to be retained or removed;
loeations of uses within buildings; and the general seale and appearanee
@
Bas€i/neereation Bistriet addr$sing sld lift upErading; future potential
i@
(efd+at{€8+s+r}
The following information and materials shall be submitted with an application for a
proposed development plan. Gertain submittal requirements may be waived or
modlfied by the Director of the llepartment of Gommunity Development It it is
demonstrated that the material to be waived or modified is not applicable to the
review crlteria, or that other practical solutions have been reached.
A. Application form and filing fee.
A written statement describing the proiect including information on the
nature of the development proposed, proposed uses, and phasing plans.
A survey stamp€d by a licensed surveyor indicating existlng conditions of
the property to be included in the development plan, including the location
ol improvements, existing contours, natural features, existing vegetation,
water courses, and perimeter property lines of the parcel.
A title report, including schedules A and B.
Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans,
elevations, etc.), it applicable.
A complete zoning analysis of the existing and proposed development
including a square footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces,
etc.
A site plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing the location and
dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, all
principal site development features, vehicular and pedestrian circulation
systems and proposed contours and drainage Plans.
Building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than
1/8" = 1', in sufficient detail to determine floor area, circulation, location of
uses and scale and appearance of the proposed development.
A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in relation to
all adjacent properties at a scale not smaller than 1" = 50'.
Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating
the visual impact of the proposed development on public and private
property in the vicinity of the proposed development plan.
An architectural or massing model at a scale suflicient to depict the
proposed development in relataonship to existing development on the slte
and on adjacent parcels.
A landscape plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing existing
landscape teatures to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and
other site development features such as recreation facilities, paths and
trails, plazas, walkways and water features.
An Environmental lmpact Report in accordancewith Chapter'18.56' unless
waived by Section 18.56.030.
Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Director
of the Community Development Department.
With the exception of the model, four complete copies of the above information shall be
submitted at the time of the application. When a model is requlred, it shall be submitted a
minimum of two weeks prior to the first formal review of the Planning and Environmental
Gommission. At the discretion of the Director of Gommunity Development, reduced copies
in 8.5" x 11" format of all of the above intormation and additlonal copies for distributaon to
the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council may be required.
18.39.120 Eedgfr DevelopmentStandards/Criteriaforevaluation.
The development plan for tlE8ki Basdneereation Eistriet shall meet ea€h of the
tollowing standards
*: The develoeer ion
B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
K.
t.
J.
M.
N.
ize
pufpoeesi
fntl€tio'rli
F: l-edestrian traffie in terms of : safety separation; eonvenienee; aeeess to Foints of
ffi
@
€f(t+sfieffitg+)
The following criteria shall be used as the principal means lor evaluating a
proposed development plan. lt shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate
that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria.
1. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scalen massing and
orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the
surrounding neighborhood.2. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to
produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the
surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole.
3. Open spa.ce and landscaping are both functlonal and aesthetic, are designed
to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize
opportunaties for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering
between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible'
are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas.
4. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe'
efflcient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the
development.5. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in
the proiect's Environmental lmpact Report, if not waived, and all necessary
matigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development
plan.6. Compliance with The Vail Comprehensive Plan and other applicable plans.
1 8.39.1 30 Lot area.
The minimum lot or site area shall be forty acres of site area, at least one acre of which
shallbe buildable area. (Ord 83 (1983) $1.)
18.39.150 Setbacks.
In the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District, front, side, rear and stream setbacks
shall be as indicated on the approved development plan. (Ord. 38 (1983) S 1.)
18.39.170 Height.
Up to
sixty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be built to a height of ftirty-five feet, or
less. No more than forty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be higher than
thirty-five feet, but not higher than forty feet. Towers, spires, cupolas, chimneys, flagpoles, and
similar architectural features not useable as gross residential floor area may extend above the
height limit a distance of not more than twenty-five percent of the height limit nor more than
fifteen feet.
(ord. 38 (1e83) $ 1 .)
18.39.180 DensityControl.
Total density shall not exceed one dwelling unit per eight acres of site area. (Ord. 38
(1e83) S 1.)
18.39.190 Sitecoverage.
Site coverage shall be as shown on the approved development plan. (Ord. 38
(1e83) S 1.)
18.39.210 Landscaping and site development.
Landscaping requirements shall be as shown on the approved development plan. All
areas within fre area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan not occupied by buibing, ground
level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped.
(ord, 38 (1e83) $ 1.)
18,39.230 Parking Plan and Program
Off street parking shell be provided in eeeordanee with Ghapter 18:52 andor as speeified
Parklng Plan and llanagement Program shall be as shown on and described In the
approved development plan.
l:\svsrrone\i mtskibsse.{Ypd
.J
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1995
7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
1. CITIZENPARTICIPATION.
2. ConsentAgenda:
Approval of the Minutes lor the meetings of November 7 and 21, 1995.
3. Qdinance No.24, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Chapter 18.39 (SkiBase/Recreation Zone Disfia) of the Vait Municipat Code and appr*ini
th-e Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail Villey Drive/Trait f, VaiiVillage Sth Filing, and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. Appticant Viit Associates, lnc.,
represented by David Gorbin.
4' Resolution No.27, Series of 1995, a Resolution setting the date for a Special Election forthepurpose of electing a Council member to complete the unexpired term of Margaret A.
Osterfoss, term to expire November, 19g7.
5. Appointment of Local Licensing Authority Member.
6. An appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision to deny the requested
front setback variance proposed for the residence curently under construction on Lot 6,
Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision/2832 C Kinnickinnick Road. The appellant, Bob Borne,
represented by sally Brainerd of RKD Design Inc., is appealing the planning and
Environmential Commission's denial of the front setback variance request, pursuint to
Section 18.62.070, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
7. Appeal of a DRB decision to approve the Intemational Wing at the Lodge at Vail, located at
174 E. Gore Creek Drive. Applicant Town Council and LuAnn Wells-
8. Town Manageis Report.
9. Adjournment.
N orE u pc o Mr NG sfi"=JllspJ,*Rrrr M E s B E Low :
rHE NExr vArL rowN
"l,iriJ,L
l!or*" woRK sEssroN
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,lallgs, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAILTOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1219/95, EEG|NNING AT 2:ilt p.M. lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAILTOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,12t190s, BEGINN|NG AT 7:30 p.M. tN Tov couNctl GHAMBERS.
il|il1
S.lgn language interpretation available upon request wilh 24 hour notification. please call 479-2114 voice or479-2356 TDD for information
C:\AGENOA.TC
7:30 P.M. 1.
7:35 P.M. 2.
7:40 P.M. 3.
Jim Curnutte
Lauren Waterton
8:40 P.M. 4.
Holly McCutcheon
8:45 P.M. 5.
Holly McOutcheon
8:50 P.M. 6.
George Ruther
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1995
7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
Consent Agenda:
Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of November 7 and 21, 1995.
Ordinane No.24, Sedgs of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing
and reenacting Chapter 18.39 (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) of the Vail
Municipal Code and approving the Development plan for the Golden peak
Ski Base,485 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, VailVillage Sth Filing, and Tract B,
Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant VailAssociates, Inc., represented by David
Corbin.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No.
24, Series of 1995 on first reading and the Proposed Development plan.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In May, 1995 VaitAssociates submitted an
application and plans for the redevelopment of the Golden peak Ski Base.
Work sessions have been held with the PEC and the Town Council
regarding the application, On November 27, 1995, the pEC approved, by a
vote of 7-0, the redevelopment application and the Zoning Code text
amendments, with 13 conditions of approval. For a complete analysis of the
proposal, please refer to lhe November 27, 1995 stafl memorandum to the
PEC, distributed to the Council on November 28, 199S.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Statf recommends approval of Ordinance No.
24, Series of 1995, and conditional approval of the Development plan.
Resolution No.27, Series of 1995, a Resolution setting the date for a Special
Election for the purpose of electing a Council member to complete the
unexpired term of Margaret A. Osterfoss, term to expire November, 1997.
Appointment of Local Licensing Authority Member.
An appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision to deny
the requested front setback variance proposed for the residence currenfly
under construction on Lot 6, Innsbruck Meadows Subdivisionl2ggz C
Kinnickinnick Road. The appellant, Bob Borne, represented by Sally
Brainerd of RKD Design Inc., is appealing the planning and Environmentral
Commission's denial of the front setback variance request, pursuant to
Section 18.62.070, of the Town of Vail MunicipalCode.
ACTION FEQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold/modify/overtum the ptanning
and Environmental Commission's decision to deny the front setbaci
variance.
AAQKGROUND RATIONALE: At the November 27, lgg| ptanning and
Environmental Commission meeting the Commission members voted g-Z
(Armour and Motfet Dissenting) to deny the proposed front setback variance
request. The members voting in favor of the motion to deny, felt that the
granting of the variance may result in a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the Zoning Code. A copy of the memorandum prepared by staff for the
Planning and Environmental Commission, and the draft minutes from the
November2T, 1995 Planning and Environmental Commission meeting, have
been attached for your reference. Also, please find attached a copy of the
appeal request letter from the appellant, Bob Bome, detailing the reasons for
the appeal.
9:20 P.M. 7.
Andy Knudtsen
11:20 P.M. 8.
11:30 P.M. 9.
SJAITF RFCOMMENDATION: Section lV, of the memorandum prepared for
the Planning and Environmental commission by the staff, indibatbs staffs
recommendation for denial of the requested front setback variance.
According to section lv of the memorandum, staft believes the request does
not meet the Cdteda and Findings, listed in Section ill of the memorandum,
in order to grant an approval of the variance request. staff believes that the
applicant has met Criteria and Findings A1, A3, 82, B3a, b and c. Staff does
not believe, however, the applicant has met Criteria and Findings A2 and 81.
statf is specilically concemed that the granting of approval of the requested
variance may result in the grant of special privilege inconsistent riritn me
limitations on other propeniss classified in the same zone district.
Appeal of a DRB decision to approve the Intemational Wing at the Lodge at
Vail, focated al174 E. Gore Creek Drive. Applicant Town Counciiand
LuAnn Wells.
ACTIgN FEOUESTED OF COUNCTL: Uphotd/overrum/modify the DRB
decision of approval.
@: on 11/1/95the DRBvoted 5-Oto approvethe
lnternational wing. Three work sessions with the oRe prei6oeo mis
decision. An exterioralteration approval bythe pEC was made on 1o/10/93.
The PEC approval was based on the criteria for exterior alterations as well
as an agreement which the Town had executed with the Lodge relating to
accommodation units and conferenoe area within the village. Given-the
preceding actions of the Town Council, Town Manger, and pEC, the purview
of the DRB review related to aesthetics, as set forth in chapter 1g.54, Design
Review.
Town Manage/s Report.
Adjoumment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEENNG STARTNMES BELOW:(ltL TuES AnE APpROIU IE AltO SITBJEC?TO cl iCE)ililil1
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNC]L REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12112195, BBGIXNING AT 2:fit p.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGUI.AR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, Izt9195, EBGII{N|NG AT 2:fit p.M. tN Tov couNctL cHAMBERs.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
wlLL BE ON TUESDAY, 1219f95, EEGINNING AT Z:30 p.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAUBERS.
il||l
9LSI!qqrqg",ihterpretationavailableuponrequestwith24hournotification. Pleasecal 47g-Z114voiceor
479-2356 TDD for information.
Cr\AGENOATCE
o
l.
2.
Town Council Worksessron
Golden Peak
December 5, 1995
AGENDA
Verybrief overview
Mention text changes
These changes are in the ordinance that Council will be discussing this evening
Hand out new attachment #l- Staff recommends approval. We have agreement with VA
and Jim Lamont on all cbanges, except Prohibited Uses section (18.39.075)
Assumptions that were made early in the process
*On-site parking was acceptable, provided it was underground, no surface parling,,
*No daily fee public parking, however, managed parking is acceptable '16 al\alifu
* No employee parking on-site
*TDA analysis - increase drop-off areas, primacy to bus users - Davri.( 'zo[n.ls t/cF4
*Size of drop-off zones - Children's Center/General Skier UIYnf 4:OO 0t13,
*Vail Valley drive should not be one-way
PEC and staff worksessions
Staffrecommended approval with 14 conditions
PEC approved on November 27, 1995 with 13 conditions
Review project with the Criteria (p. 13)
Zonehange Criteria
Compliance with Comprehensive Plan
Development Plan Standards and Criteria
Criteria for Approving Multi-family dwellings
Issues that remain to be discussed:
Approval Criteria have been met with the following excqrtions:
Vail Village Master Plan recommends:
* Ped. Improvements to Ford Park and the Soccer field (p' 17)
Development plan criteria fu.31)* Reduce mass and bulk of the building - step building back on 3rd and 4th
floors on the east and north sides. Conclusion was to pull covered deck
areas back. Additional GRFA that has been added is causing the boxy
building. Too much emphasis on residential function.
* PEC recommended that the old tower be used on the south elevation.
.4,
,,
! 3.
4.
5.
(z
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,i
,_<--'/
Jc
Steetscape Mdster Plan recmrmends (p.18):
* East side sidewalk - in orout?
* ?lazaat Mill Creek Circle is not designed as the lvlaster Plan shoors Z
* Chil&en's Center sidewalk 4ft. Vs. 6ft.
* Sidewalk to Soccer field* Financial corrmitnents for off-site improvemeds
54/1/+ore
Develqler Imlrove,ment fureement needs to be entered into
* Outline TOVA/A financial cmmitnents
+ Transferof easements
+ Creation of a neighborhood ass$sment conmifiee
7. Conditions of approval
staffcditions and how the PEC modified them Wrv(
_J i*, L"r"-at_
7{,aL',L,'4.^ee .ugcg q,/P b*,4 M,r,ed. ft
; (-t^L gafi)n ftql o/&*i +h ert;q
' aeQue/^*vbt /e 4nyrwu( a*'e.d^ft
ulirq" eq* 1eCC"e,(,oru e € <Qsi*-.(
fryea,,{7 eo4,la/eASc
rJ --lrffiE
I
tf
ir,.,f
i
&dne*e.d ,<Je.qr -b,p ,fu #{
*cg{4^"fuwef.
;OR & 3[& (,L,{ r1;f4u,e',0 r'e
, lcebf$
.Q&
btr
, t a -'h^ gtJ@fsde_-
|
-t 'A ( L*Terrrc% u4-
-llnqr^g*-Jeic+-@ar Q,JA
€4
/q y" g6raiT4wcf'o 6s epa$F
t+ +by qreQr.LG # -h-,,& ffi4qt qt( -(-q- {u ),-agff1'cr,*n,{ Sb kS
e€ {(/* zfqsag V r+ w i C t G,tu s* A+={t
+*- "ta: k @ y,{-- 4Y - tu3f,6 rrr
cX tw^e p,v/ ,/<'YlA- [f" o*Prw*<
*Z+-"Ltp**'f f 4u' ,^>_A t.h L*y;;cc*da
---p=yt^eta{ )b (,ert - &i[, r,c.t)',Lor WI <e +.o hre d"t*,u*,'*,,nL e{ 9p diO.--R.qto.**e,**e{ 4rr< cp=€t^L fl k.4
9:pl=*..5 < (=,..urbrz ./'c\) t'lA +*Le
-e U.<L L
- C [^p, n ryee. -f€, 'dL //ra".<-tqgQ nrc.n d
dr^-;,{_^€. _f_
-?6a- flf*ry , -,.-&-
:t;h€+ Lo(,;* 11^+ q^Nig,e:>z q-
nvrqC,t,f ,,x'1gD /b ffQ-Mfutd f,.Ocelsq
+{"< **e '1 ufi<-* /e g,a- l* u-}ri otl
-+4tr (pc=, (t,;i*/" ecJ*r<' Pq{<rtr:f hc€> F*J +o Q+ ctsesso{
-.W>-e- =6,sc& f"Mn*. q,V.l^,+rcd-C q.^
| ,\_o
\>eL.6rq
?fufttrlr\
dm?- b4f CuwA4
\ .-r T\. \A,,vV '? ' r.:eB
')'^-
P .l/lDEc 6'ss 11:LccHrirff^Ttfon*"ousE
AssocloN
Vail, Colorado
c/o Riks Woofien
3700 East Alarncds A.venue #500
Derver, Colorado 80209
303-3 I 8-55 35 or F ss. 303 -322-37 69
December 5, 1995
Town Council
Tovvn of Vail
by FN(: 7904n-215'l
Idicg urd Oatlemen:
It is our undcrsAnding that you will rhortly bc conslduing the ra
development of Gold Peak, the rwiew prccess having becn underway sincc last
summer. Our asEociation has participaEd in mury of the dissrssions ud
meetings directly and also through ttre Esst ViUqge Homeowncrs Association.
We are pleased to add our general support b the plan, especially thc nccdcd lift
ud base facilitics as well as tre improved apccss frcm the parking structurc,
fiterc are two conc€rns that we wish h voice. First is the addition of
seven feet to the hcight of thc ncw base/condo building. As you may know, otu
building is immediately below the Gold Pcak basc, otr the qek bclow thc lovcr
tcnnis courts. Our concerns werc voiced in 1985 and hara been rcpeatcd tbis
yesr conceming the diminution of oru vien, of the mounhins. Frankly, I arn
not surt how high the proposed building is rclative to tho existing suucire. Io
1985, we were assurpd that the then proposed structurc would be no highu than
thc cxisting building. Now wE arc told that the Tontn staffreguircd that sc^r€n
ftet be addcd. Tlut sounds like our view will be impaired.
The secnnd oonoern is thc continued existence of Chalet Road on the
plans. It is our undershnding that Chalet Itoad is o be closed or re-routcd in
some fashion. As you know, East Gore Creek Drive was vacatpd some yec$
ego, so there is no through way for Chalet Road b follow. It has been dosed
in tlrc wintcr for years, although it is our dcsire to kcep a pedestrian path open.
We have offered b assist in thc rc-development and landscaping of the Chalct
Road right+f-way, urd stand rcsdy to do so.
Pleasc acccpt our sumort urd criticism of the Gold Peak Redcveloprrcnt
Plan as congfuctive and cmperativc. Ws worrld normally be attcrding tln
Council meeting today, but unfortunatcly none of our mornbcrg is able to be in
Vail today. Tlrant you for your considention.
RiLeD. Wooten
Pr$ident
--7oFe- VL,f e{ ,-e>{ €Je /;/r*4
*5/l Yl.t r'' / r'\l t A - /l5 a( SC2'-t(rcndl /co,yna'f ,Yr.
+dz t5nua1t re. n' i tr; cL?"a1"€d 44i
s,T,^Wf *f Smffi#.r?XW"mt
a a-vt
i
I
I
I
As-Cp.ptc] C ,,,';U dLQit
il
'I
jI
I-t
I
1
I
''1
I
t.l
I
I
I..t
I
I
nl{. I
r//
,+ ef
\'- )"+,piffuM,(e
b''''d,r,anJ e
GOLDEN PEAK PARKING ESTIMATE
This parking estimate is very preliminary. None of the assumptions that were made (related to
parking requirements for uses not listed in the TOV Municipal Code) have been reviewed or
conlirmed by the PEC or planning staff.
lJse Net Sq. Ft. Code Requirement
Olfices
lst floor - Lockerroom 5,220 sq. ft. I space per 250 sq. ft. = 20.9
2nd floor - Restaurant /Ivfgr. Office
2nd floor - Ticket sales / ski school
Retail
lst floor - Public lockers 16,321 sq. ft. I space per 300 sq. ft. = 54.4
2nd floor - Retail area
Private club area
Employee locker room
Eating & Drinking
2nd floor - Restaurant 5,455 sq. ft. I space per sq. ft'.llil& = 45.5
Meeting Rooms
lst floor - Rec room 2,301 sq. ft. I space per sq. ft"115/8 = 19.2
Condos
Unit I
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
Unit 6
Children's Center
Recreation Facilitv Reo uirement.
Total =
4,631 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per DU
3,339 sq. ft. 2.5
5,000 sq. ft. 2.5
3.295 sq. ft. 2.5
3,590 sq. ft. 2.5
3,596 sq. ft. 2.5
l5 spaces
35 sPaces (Perrecommendation from
TDA, V.A. TransPortation
consultant)
0*
190 sPaces **
* No parking requirement was assessed for the skiing activities of Golden Peak.
** A multi use credit reduction is not applicable
f:\everyone\ im\chara\ptparkr30
GOLDEN PEAK PARKING ANALYSTS
Existing
long-term spaces 150
skierdrop-off l0
children's drop-off 2l
TOTALSPACES 18I
Proposed
148
29
_30
207
Proposed
0
14.5
-15
29.5
SCENARIO#I
Staffbelieves that the short-term drop-off spaces are not equal to long-temt parking
spaces, since they cannot be utilized all the time. They will, however, be available for
long-term parking during the non-skiing months. Therefore, we recommend they be given
half credit for these spaces,
Existing
long-term spaces 150
skierdrop-off 5
children's drop-off 10.5
TOTAL SPACES 165.5
Difference = 136
SCENARIO #2
The staffand the Plenning Commission have determined that the parking scheme, as
curenfly designd results in no net loss of parking, as compared to existing conditions.
Therefore, if the parking structure is not built, then there would be a loss of 148 spaces.
148
_0
148 spaces lost
SCENARIO #3
If we assume that all parking spaces ile equal, and the parking sbucture is not built, then
there would be a total of 5 9 spaces on the property at the end of construction (3 0
Children's drop-offand 29 skier drop-off).
l8l Existing
=59 Proposed
122 spaces lost
SCENARIO #4
Since VA is preparing to start marketing the private club memberships immediately, it
may be possible to have an answer to whether or not the structure will be built very soon.
If it is determined that not enough sales have been made, should VA go back to the PEC
and Council to present a plan ihat shows no parking stucture? We would then have an
answer to this question prior to issuing a building permit.
SCENARIO #5
It may not be in the best interest of the Town to attempt to assess the impacts of the loss
the stucture at this time, without a more detailed professional analysis. If the structure is
not built in l97,but the remaining improvements are (with their associated traffic
impacts) what are the tue implications of that rather significant change to the previously
approved plan? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to make that determination at that time?
A cash payment to the Town may not be determined to be the most appropriate solution
the the issue at the time.
Sheetscape Improvements:
1. West side of Vail Valley Drive streetscape improvements, including:
A. Vorlaufer parking lot redesign
B. Improvements to the east side of the road, as may be required to establish roadway
C. Private landscaping redesign
D. All improvements shown on the steetscape plan zubnritted to TOV
E. Widen bridge across Gore Creek
F. Aesthetic improvements to bridge
G. Need ROW in front of Vorlaufer
2. Steetscape improvements in front ofthe Galatyn
A. Modifications to improved walkway to widen for ADA access and clearance
3. East side of Vail Valley Drive imprcvements
A. Sidewalk infill at Ramshorn
B. Sidewalk from Vail Trails to strearnwalk
C. AcquireROW
4. Mill Creek Circle / Tivoli Lodge connection to Village Path
A. Connection parallel to Mill Creek Circle
B. Connection parallel to the Tivoli property line
5. On-siteimprovernents
A. Mill Creek Circle Plaza'
B. Bike paths/sidewalks/tails
C. Skierdrop-offlot
D. Bus turnaround and Children's Center drop-offlots and bus shelters
6. ManorVail enty redesign
A. Enby realignment
B. Sidewalks
C. Landscaping
D. Close dangerous walkway
'l . Vail Valley Drive Realignment
A. Realignment from Mill Creek Circle to Manor Vail south entry
8. Steetscape improvernents to tle soccer field
9. Ford Park improvements
A. Signs
B. Construction of path
C. Maintenanceofpath
10.Sipprogram
A. On-site sips
B. Off-site sips
f
)^'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEIIBER 5, 1995
12:OO P.M.IN TOv couNcIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
Innsbruck Meadows/Bome pEC Appeat - Site Visit.
InternationalWing - Site Visit.
Susan Boyd Ten Year Anniversary.
PEC Review.
Local Licensing Authority lnterviews.
Committee Appointments.
Discttssion of Ordinance !9,2a, Series ol 1 995, first reading of an ordinance repealing andreenacting Chapter 18.39 (Ski Base/Recreation Zone Disfict) of the Vait Municipat6ode
1n.cl lqRroving the Development plan lor the Golden peak ski Base, 485 viit vatteyDrive/Tract F, Vail Village Sth Fiting, and rract B, Vait Viilage 7th Fiting. nppticant VaitAssociates, Inc., represented by David Corbin.
Information Update.
Council Reports.
Other.
11. Adjoumment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TTMES ARE APPROX|MATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
rHE NEXr vArL rowN
"l,iriJ,i-'rlou*" woRK sEssroNwfLL BE oN TuESDAY,l2l't2lgs, BEGINN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL GHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAILTOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12119/95, EEG|NN|NG AT 2:fit p.M. lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 12/19/95, BEG|NN|NG AT z:80 p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.il||l
lq-Eryugqe,interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please cail 47g-Zjl4voice or479-2356 TDD for information.
C:\AGENDAWSE
8.
9.
10.
t
t'
12:00 P.M. 1.
George Ruther
12:2OP.M. 2.
Andy Knudtsen
1:05 P.M.
1:10 P.M.
1:25 P.M.
1:40 P.M.
4.
5.
6.
VAILTOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1995
12:00 P.M. tN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
Site Visit - An appeal ol the Planning and Environmental Commission's
decision to deny the requested front setback variance proposed for the
residence currently under construction on Lot 6, Innsbruck Meadows
Subdivision/2832 C Kinnickinnick Road. The appellant, Bob Borne,
represented by Sally Brainerd of RKD Design Inc., is appealing the
Planning and Environmental Commission's denial of the front setback
variance request, pursuant to Section 18.62.070, of the Town of Vail
MunicipalCode.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Visit site.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: At the November 27, 1995 Planning and
Environmental Commission meeting the Commission members voted 3-2
(Armour and Motfet Dissenting) to deny the proposed front setback
variance request. The members voting in favor of the motion to deny, felt
that the granting of the variance may result in a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the Zoning Code. A copy of the memorandum prepared
by stafl for the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the draft
minutes from the November 27,1995 Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting, have been attached for your reference. Also,
please find attached a copy of the appeal request letter from the
appellant, Bob Borne, detailing the reasons lor the appeal.
Site Visit - Appeal of a DRB decision to approve the International Wing at
the Lodge at Vail, located al174 E. Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Town
Council and LuAnn Wells.
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCIL: Visit site.
On 11/1/95 the DRB voted 5-0 to approve
the Intemational Wing. Three work sessions with the DRB preceded this
decision. An exterior alteration approval by the PEC was made on
10/10/83. The PEC approval was based on the criteria for exterior
alterations as well as an agreement which the Town had executed with
the Lodge relating to accommodation units and conference area within the
Village. Given the preceding actions of the Town Council, Town Manger,
and PEC, the purview of the DRB review related to aesthetics, as set forth
in Chapter 18.54, Design Review.
Susan Boyd Ten Year Anniversary,
PEC Review.
Local Licensing Authority Interviews.
Gommittee Appointments:a. Northwest Colorado Council of Governments Board.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Tom Steinberg has served
as the Board Member on NWCCOG. Sybill Navas has served as
the Alternate. After discussion of this item, a motion should be
made as follows: "l move that _ be appointed as the
representative of the Vail Town Council on the Northwest Colorado
Council of Governments Board of Directors." The motion should
be seconded and voted by the Council. The appointment of the
Alternate will be similar.
Sybill Navas has volunteered to serve on this board.
I*t
9. _ Water Quatity/euantity Committee/NWCCOG Member.
ACTION REq,PESTED OF COUNCTL: Tom Steinberg has served
as the Council's representative on this committee. SfOitt ttavas
has served as the Apprentice. After discussion of thii item, a
motion should be made as follows: ,,1 move that _ be
appointed as the representative of the Vail Town-Councit on the
Appointment Committee to euality/euantity Committee/
NWCCOG.' The motion should be seconded and voted by the
Council. The appointment of the Apprentice will be similar.
Sybill Navas has volunteered to serve on this committee.
c. Vail ValleyTourism & Convention Bureau.
ACT_ION REOUESTED OF COUNCTL: Jan Strauch has served as
the Board Member on the VW&CB Board. Jim Shearer has
serued as the Altemate. After discussion of this item, a motion
should be made as follows: "l move that _ be appointed
as the representative of the Vail Town Council on the Vail Valley
Tourism & Convention Bureau Board of Directors." The motion
should be seconded and voted by the Gouncil. The appointment
of the Altemate will be similar.
A Town Council member is required. Meetings are held the third
Wednesday of each month, approximate hours 9:00 a.m. - 11:00
a.m. The time commitment is 2 to 3 hours per month.
d. Vail Transportation and Parking Task Force.
ACJI9N IEOUESTEP OF COUNCTL: Sybilt Navas and peggy
Osterfoss have served as Town Council representatives on tn6
Transportation and Parking Task Force. After discussion of this
item, a motion should be made as follows: "l move that
be appointed to represent the Vail Town Council on the Vail
Transportation and Parking Task Force." The motion should be
seconded and voted by the Council.
Kevin Foley has volunteered to serue on this task force. Meetings
are generally held once a month.
e. Golorado Association of Ski Towns Member and Alternate.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:Jim Shearer has served on
the Executive Board of CAST as the CAST member. Merv Lapin
has served as the Altemate. After discussion of this item, a mbtion
should be made as follows: "l move that_ be appointed
as the representative of the Vail Town Council for the Colorado
Association of Ski Towns.' The motion should be seconded and
voted by the Council. The appointment of ths Altemate will be
similar.
Meetings are held every other month around the State. There is
no set date or time limit. The Mayor should serye on this, with an
altemate.
f. Vail Recreation DistricUTown Council Subcommittee
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Merv Lapin and paul
Johnslon have served as Town Gouncil r€presentatives on this
committee. After discussion of this item, a motion should be made
as follows: "l move that _ and _ be appointed to
represent the Vail Town Council on the VRD/Town Couhcil
Committee.' The motion should be seconded and voted on by the
Gouncil.
Meetings are held once a quarter and a Council member should sit
on this committee. Paul Johnston is not longer interested in sitting
on this committee.
II
,I
t
S, Special Events Committee.
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCTL: Sybiil Navas has served as
Town Council representatives on this committee. After discussion
of this item, a motion should be made as follows: "l move that
be appointed to represent the Vail Town Council on
the Special Events Committee.' The motion should be seconded
and voted on by the Council.
Meetings are generally held twice a month, but sometimes more.
The meetings run about two hours. Sybill would like to continue on
this committee.
h. Bravo! Colorado Board.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Merv Lapin and Sybiil
Navas have served as Town Council representatives on this
board. After discussion of this item, a motion should be made as
follows: "l move that _ and _ be appointed to
represent the Vail Town Council on the Bravo! Colorado Board."
The motion should be seconded and voted on by the Council.
This board meets once a month tor 2to 3 hours and a Council
member is required. Merv Lapin continues to sit on this board until
1998, so if no Council members are interested. he will fill in.
i. Eagle County Recreation Authority.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Merv Lapin has served as
the Council's representative on this committee. Jim Shearer has
served as the Alternate. After discussion of this item, a motion
should be made as follows: "l move that _ be appointed
as the representative of the Vail Town Council on the Eagle
County Recreation Authority Gommittee." The motion should be
seconded and voted by the Council, The appointment of the
Alternate will be similar.
Meetings are nitd on the first Thursday of each quarter. Paul
Johnston would like to continue serving on this board.
j. Town of Vail Housing Authority.
ACT]ON REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Peggy Osterfoss has
served as the Council's representative on the Authority. Jim
Shearer has served as the Alternate. After discussion of this item,
a motion should be made as follows: "l move that _ be
appointed as the representative of the Vail Town Council on the
Vail Housing Authorig." The motion should be seconded and
voted by the Council. The appointment of the Altemate will be
similar.
Meetings generally are held once a quarter with one hour
meetings. There is the potential for more time when there are
special projects.
k. Channel 5 Vail Valley Community Television Board.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: SybittNavas has served as
the Council's representative on this board. After discussion of this
item, a motion should be made as follows: "l move that _
be appointed as the representative of the Vail Town Council on the
Channel 5 Vail Valley Community Television Board." The motion
should be seconded and voted by the Council.
Meetings are held the first Tuesday of every month. Sybill would
like to continue serving on this board.
tI
\I
I
l. Vail Valley Afts Council.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Jan Strauch has served as
the Council's representiative on this committee. After discussion ol
this item, a motion should be made as follows: "l move that
be appointed as the representative of the Vail Town
Council on the Vail Valley Arts Council." The motion should be
seconded and voted by the Council.
M€etings are held the first and third Monday of each month with
meetings generally from 8:30 a.m. to 1O:fi) a.m. A Council
member is required by ordinance.
m. Maud Nottingham Environmental Award.
ACTION REOUESTED OF COUNCIL: Tom Steinberg has served
as the Council's representative on this committee. After
discussion of this item, a motion should be made as follows: "l
move that be appointed as the representativ€ of the
Vail Town Council on the Mauri Nottingham Environmentral Award
Committee." The motion should be seconded and voted by the
Council.
Meetings are held twice a year in the spring. A Council member is
required.
n. Lodge at Vail Land Swap.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Merv Lapin, paulJohnston,
Bob McLaurin and Tom Moorhead have served as representiatives
on this committee. After discussion of this item, a motion should
be made as follows:'l move that , _,
be appointed as the
representative of the Vail Town Council on the Lodge at Vait Land
Swap Committee.' The motion should be seconded and voted by
the Council.
There are no scheduled mebting. Paulwould like to continue to
serve on this committee.
o. Vail Valley Exchange/Sister Cities.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Merv Lapin served as Town
Council representatives on this committes. After discussion of this
item, a motion should be made as follows: "l movs that _
be appointed as the representative ol the Vail Town Council on the
Vail Valley Exchange Commiftee." The motion should be
seconded and voted by the Council.
Meetings are held once a month for approximately one and one
half hour meetings. A Council member is required,
p. RegionalTransportationAuthority.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: peggy Ostertoss has
served as Town Council representative on this authority with Tom
Steinberg as the Altemate. After discussion of this item, a motion
should be made as follows: "l move that_ be appointed as
the representrative of the Vail Town Council on the Regional
Transportation Authority." The motion should be seconded and
voted by the Council. The appointment of the Altemate will be
similar.
Kevin Foley has volunteered to serve on this authority. An
Alternate is needed. A Town representative must be present at
every meeting.
I
t
2:40 P.M. 7.
Jim Curnutte
Lauren Waterton
5:40 P.M. L
5:50 P.M. 9.
6:00 P.M. 10.
6:10 P.M. 11.
q. Ford Park Management Plan.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Jan Strauch has served as
the Council's representative on this committee. After discussion of
this item, a motion should be made as follows: "l move that
be appointed as the representative of the Vail Town
Council on the Ford Park Management Plan Committee.' The
motion should be seconded and voted by the Council.
Meetings are generally held once a month. A Council member is
required.
r. The Chamber.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: PaulJohnston has served
as the Council's representative on this committee. After
discussion of this item, a motion should be made as follows: "l
move that _ be appointed as the representative of the
Vail Town Council on the Chamber Committee.' The motion
should be seconded and voted by the Council.
The Chamber meets the third Friday of each month, Paul would
like to continue serving on The Chamber.
s. Open Space/Charter Gommittee.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:This wiIIbe a new
committee following the November, 95 election. lt will consist of
one Council Member, a member of the Planning & Environmental
Commission and the Town Manager. After discussion of this
item, a motion should be made as follows: "l move that _
be appointed as the representative ol the Vail Town Council on the
Open Space Committee." The motion should be seconded and
voted by the council.
Discussion of the proposed amendments to Chapter 18.39 of the
Vail Municipal Code (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) and an
amendment to the previously approved development plan for the Golden
Peak Ski Base, 485 VailValley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village Sth Filing, and
Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.,
represented by David Corbin.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Hear presentation from statf and
the applicant regarding the issues related to the proposed redevelopment.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In May, 1995 VailAssociates submitted an
application and plans lor the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base.
Work sessions have been held with the PEC and the Town Council
regarding the application. On November 27,1995, the pEC approved, by
a vote of 7-0, the redevelopment application and the Zoning Code text
amendments, with 13 conditions of approval. For a complete analysis of
the proposal, please refer to the November 27,199S staff memorandum
to the PEC, distributed to the Council on November 28. 1995.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In preparation for the evening meeting,
staff recommends that the Council discuss the issues related to the
proposed redevelopment application.
Inlormation Update.
Council Repofts.
Other.
Adlournment.
't
\II
NOTE UPCOMING MEENNG STARTTIMES BELOW:(^rnr'Es
^RE^ppRox'TT ii ir"."toCH^NGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 1212195, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:dr p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAILTOWN CouNcIL REGUL/NI woRK SEssIoN
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, lZ19l95, BBGINtrI!{G AT 2:dl P.M. lN TOV COUNCTL CHAITIBERS.
THE NEXT VAILTOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 1z1gl95, BEG|NN|NG AT 7:30 p.M. tN Tov couNctl CHAMBERS.tttiltl
Sign language interpretalion available upon reguest with 24 hour notilication. Please call 479-2114 voice
or 479-2356 TDD lor informalion.
Cr\AGENDAWSE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
llEtrlORANIruil
Town Council
Community Development Department
tmrrnryC
Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment
Attached to this memo is the staff memorandum on the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base
fledevelopment, which was reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission on
November 27,1995. This memorandum is provided to the Council members as background
information for the discussion of the Golden Peak Redevelopment Application, which is
scheduled to occur on the afternoon of November 28, 1995.
Although the Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment Application is not scheduled lor a first
reading review until December 5, 1995, staff requested a brief worksession in order to familiarize
the council members with the proposed redevelopment project.
r)
TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REOUEST
(Request form InUSI be glven to the Secretary to the Town Manager by 8:00 a.m' Thursdays.)
MEETINGDATE: November23. 1995
(Prepare a separate Agenda Request for each agenda item. lf the agenda
item will be discussed at both a work session and an Evening Meeting, be
certaln to check both boxes In thls sectlon end Indlcate tlme naeded durlng
each meeting.)
TIME NEEDED: thour
Site Visit
Evening Meeting
TIME NEEDED:
TIME NEEDED:-
WILLTHERE BE A PRESENTANON ON THIS AGENDA trEM BY NON.TOV STAFF?
XX r.ro.
tr YES. Specifics:
WILL THE PRESENTATION OF THIS AGENDA ITEM REOUIRE ANY SPECIAL EOUIPMEI'IT?
XX r,ro.
tr YES. Specifics:
WILLTHERE BE MATERIALTO BE INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET FOR THF |TEM?
tr No.
XX wo* session
tr
tr
XX ves. lf yes, is the material also forpublitclisUbution?
XX Yes.
tr No.
ITEM/TOPIC: A worksession to discuss the proposed amendments to Chapter 18.39 of the Vail
Municipal Code (Ski Base/Recreation Zone Distict), and an amendment to the
previously approved development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail
Vatley Drive/iract F, Vail Viilage Sth Filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: VailAssociates, lnc., represented by David Corbln
Planners: Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton
ACTTON REOUESTED OF COUNCIL: Hear presentation from lhe staff regarding lheproposed
redevelopment. The presentation is intended to familiarize the council members with the issues
related t6 the project in preparation for formal consideration (first reading) at the December 5,
1995 Town Council Meeting.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In May of 1995, VA submitted a plan for the redevelopment of the
Golden Peak Ski Base. Worksessions have been held with the PEC and the Town Council
regarding the application.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A
Jim Curnutte
Lauren Waterton
Community Development