HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 3 VAIL 21 CONDOS 1972 GENERAL LEGALa;a
-I the TAG ossociotesI orchitectsta2.6Jh suir,e3lo deTbi$
Ed Struble
Municipal offices
Town of Vai.l
Vai1, Colorado 81657LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: 23 t(av 1972
Re: vail 21
Gentlemen:
We ane tnansmitting the following:
One copy of resoonse to ICBO Plan Check
Thank you,
Theodor A. Grossman, Jr.
the TAG associates, anchitects
THE TAG ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
82O sixteenth stneet suite 31O
denver, colonado eO2O2
(3O3) 534-6905
22 May L972
I.C.B.O.
5360 Soutit I'lorkman Road
iJhittier, California 90601
ATTN: Mr. Koyamatsu
Dear Mr. Koyamatsu:
$le are enclosing our reply to your plan ched< of the vail 21 buildlng,Vail-ilions Head, Colorado, dated aI May 1972.
I'le will be looking fonrard to your further renrarks concerning this matter.
q i nraral rr
,(\,A "| . / | v"/ N-Y;'vtL''i.'"=---
Theodor A. Grossman, Jr.
Enclosures
2 letters
Addenda 3 and 4
Dravring SD-l
Fireplace informatlon
c. c. to:
Ed Struble
Charles Rosenquist
TAG,/cap
RESPONSE fO I.C.B.O. PLAN CHECK
VAIf, 21 CONDOMINIUM
GE}']ERAL CO}OIENTS
-g, 1. A11 plan layouts must be approved by public building officiars in theVail area.
Z.For the contemplated uses of the lease space, at th;is time it appearsthat this statement is val-id.
In a recentr.eetingin Vail , 15 l4ay 1972, with building officials,property lines on south, easL and north have been worked out to thesatisfaction of all. Regarding the property line to the west, the
owners have applied for a variance because of adjacent building being
6' -0" tro* property lines. v,te will show a revised site plan show"ing
these changes as per suggestlons in meeting.
lJe have appli-ed for a variance on this item. In accordance wl th the
Town of Vail procedures for varlances ln this question, a variance will
be applied for.
NONSTRUCTURAL COIIIqENTS
1. .dr U,zT, type class I'A asphal t shingle roofing has been substi tuted forfire retardant shingles. In accordance with Vail standards and building
methods, all wood used in the roofing system shal1 be fire retardant
treated .
b. Duckboard floor is to be fire retardant treated in accordance withlocal building precedent.+
2. Our specs called for shingles to be fi-re-retardant treated.
labeled " l,/ood Shingles" under Section Roofing Systens,'.
The specification for applicatlon of wood sbingle cold roof
described in this section. However, as mentioned prior, westituted U/L t]pe Class [A't asphalt slr,ingl e roofing in place
shingles.
n4'
S ection
is also
have sub-
.of wood
3. a. Note that shaft enclosure is composed of 6" concrete block, 2 layersof l/ztt type x dryrrall protecting all joists, I layer ot 1./2 type xdryvrall O each side of 1" coreboard O partitions separatj_ng janitor
closet from all shafts, arrd that openings from tfre exterlor.shall be
ho11ow metal franed irBr' labe1 doors with self closi_ng device.b. door to Machine Roorn 1C7 shal1 be 'tBr' 1abel (t)f hour) labeled
,assembly as called for in door: scheduler Sheet A-2.
4, The trash chute terminates on level 3 in a room separated from the corridor
( exterlor) and the remainder of the building by con@rete block (6"), The
door ls a rrBt' l-abel- self closing assembly.
dr Public toilets wi]I be provided as lease-hold improvements by tenan tsin lease space, The toilets shall be reviewed for confonnance with
code at time of application for lease hold improvemen t pennit. Note,toilets 108, 109 are considered employee toilets, not public facilities.b. The access for the handicapped to the bullding is provided by the
grade 1eve1 walks from the east property line to the ,'2rr leveI. This
matter has been discussed rrri th and verballv approved by the local buildino
vr l. J-\-J-A.L .€
Ihis is not a public toilet. t|,t
B. A11 openings within 2Ot of the property lines abut " open space,' (See
Vail Zoning Code) and wil-l be subject to vari-ance, ALy/. # ry,9. Our specifications call out a1l. steel colunns, girders and beams to be
sprayed with fire proofing spray (I,iono-Kote) as manufac tured by Con-
struc tj-on Products Division to provide a 2 hour ratingr An amendmen tshall be made calljng specifically for the following:30 COlUmnS - l%n thick coat of lliono-kote
b. bearns - 7,/8" thick coat of rliono-kote
The test nunber for this material- is ASTM E-119. Our details wiJ.1 complyto the thicknesses indicated above.
10; I'i'e have specified bathtubs "Fibresheen". These units are manufactured
in accordance vlith USA Standard Z 12a-.2-I967. The material is 25% qlass
fiber and rfleets FHA standards.
11. The project has no shovrer or bathtub doors, etc.
12, Note! specifications call for 2 layers of 14', type x gypsum board
screwed to suspended furring channels O 16t' o.c. Addendum to thisspecificalion rsj-l1 be nade, conforming to item no. 11, table 43-6,
U.B.C. if requi-red bj' I.C.B.O. The original spec r.ras in accordance wi- th
U.S.G. sp€co7 test i;USG LB9-FT-G1,IH. (S) ULD is 221-2 hr. (f).
13. i.lono-kote spec vrill be amended to read 7 /Btt cover f ;:r bear,rs. 1t ' coverfor columns. (ASTfi"E-119). If I.C.B.O. will indicate specific
th j-ckness requirema-rt, we vri1l comply.
74'' This comment is not clear - a1I colurnns are individually fire protgcted,
and all electrlcal outlet boxes shall be steel , not exceedinq 16in- in
area - tor G/3-3 co.L. see Det. 2,/Af 1 .
15. The owner is requircd to submit final partition layouts and details in
lease spaces prior 1:o jnstallation - by ordinance (this wilt be done).
16. l,/e vrill enclose all the available j-nformation on this prefab fireplace.
t'Je shou]d add that :his r.rnit is rvidcl.r used in similar installatj.ons in
been al)proved by Vail building officials.
77: The windolv area reqrrired for an assumed 24x38 module is approxinrately
L00 square feet. We have generously provj-ded for window area with an
average of about 300 sq. ft. per 24,x39t module. For ventilation pur-
poses, we have indicated approximately 54 sq. ft. of area (openable,
see Sht. A-14) plus door openings.
6.
7.
o
18. The wa1l which separates the boiler room from the rest.of the buildingis 1 layer of k" tlpe x drywall on both sides of steel studs. Thereare two exits out of the boiler room each with .B' rabel doors and steelframes. There i.s no ductwork piercing this wall-.
19. The riving room, dining room, and kitchen area compose one large openspace which.is approximately 360 sq. ft. I/2O x 360 = 6pps6ximately
18 sq. ft. of reguired ventilation needed. b/indow w-l gives ra sq. rt.of area and the sliding glass door to the balcony is approxJ_mately
16 sguare feet for a total of 30 sq. ft. of ventiLation. rf the dining-kitchen area is considered a separate space ( 1i.2 sq. ft. ) then windowuJ-l is sufficient for ventilation.
20, The mechanical ventilating systern in the baths of condominium providesfive air changes/hour directly to the outsj-de. The fan capacity is
50 c. f .m.
,,pit Ey'its
ao As mentioned previously vre have applied for a variance on this iten'in accordance with the Town of Vail procedures for variances.
b. Ail exit doo.rs are openabJ.e from the inside without the use of a key;special knowledge or effort. There are no surface mounted flusl: orsurface bolts specified.
co Plans have been rev:-sed showing exterior exit barcony conditions.1. North vral I of lease rvall 106 is a blank concrete blk. wa1l.
ltrest waIl of lease space L06 fronts directly onto exteri"or public
sta.irvrays leading to permanent open space.
East rrrall- of lease space 106 faces directly onto space which is,
though covered, unheated and openj.ng directly to the exterj-or viapublic staj_r M and stair H.2. South wall of lease space 101 faces directly onto space which,tho:gh covered, is unheated and opening directly to the exterior
vi"a stairs L, J l,I and H. Furt rermore, note on south elevation
A-B that an open space 3,-O,t high x width of said space, protected
by an open rail is provided.
3, South wa1l of lease space 110 faces onto exterior spaces which,
though covered, is unheated ancl opens di-rectly to the exteriorvia public stai-rs LrJrt"l and H, which lead directly to pubric outside
space.
4, See revised spandrel on Sht. SD-l- which is more than 65% open to
{-}ro av}ari a-
5. East wa1l of lease space 102, the 4r-8" area of the southeastcorner of lease space 102 faces di_rectly to space whj-ch though
covered is exterior and leads to permanen t open space via stairsLrJrl,l arld H. The glass wall faces directly to space vrhich, thoughcovered, is exterio.r and leads to permanent open space via stairsL,Jrl.I and H.
d. The landing dir.rensions. on stairways are alr shown on the stairschedule (sht. A-L2). The minimum landing vridth is 3,-8'r which is thedinension of the stair vrj.dth , /g.il,t. y r- A '
€r At stair At 1evel 2, rrote folding lockabie gate across down stair
aS i-ndicated On Sht. A-3. Stair C leadS not to a basement" but topublic exterior space, though covered, and leadilg directly to permanent
open space via stair J.
f. The Vail code allows handrails Lo be 39 inches in height vthich is
the dimension we have shovrn on the drawings. The spacing be trveen
intermediate rails or balusters complies with the !,i" ninirum cl"earance
standard .
gr This lra Lch is not recluired for snokeproof enclosure stairs as
mentioned in 3305 1 (stairs Cand D). The other stairs are exterior
stairs. Thus, v:e are assuming that the hatch (16 sq. ft. with a minj-mal
dinensi-on of 2 feet) is not needed t d"I
h. S tainralr enclosures
1. rr v-ised spandrel- detailing sD-l shoufd gualify exit blaconies as
exter,j.or. Stairs other than stairs C and D are open exterior
^ r-- .i -^>LCIM,.
2. S.jre as llo. I above.
?- Sinr-c, .sfai rs mentioned above are now "exterior" r this note should
no longer apply.
4. A11 enclosed exits exit onto a comidor on the ground floor
e:<1_c_ clj,ng to the exterior, A1i construction of the corridors is of
2 hour fire resi-stive construction.
5. see 21 (e) above.
This stair has been revised by Ed Strub.l-e, Vail building officiaf and has
been construed as opening onto an exter.Lor exit balcony. see note on
No, 4 of general colnnen ts re: variance for loft leveIs.
23. Complete exit light system connected ahead of electrical main switch is
provided. All exit fixtures have 2 lamps.
24;. IJI sleeping roonis below fourth floor are provided rvi th windows con-
forming to section 1304 for elTrergenc)/ exit or rescue.
25. OLrr dravrings show a 7t-4tt x 7r-8r' manually operable steel lor:ver for
venting.
26, Ou,r roof drainage system complies vrith this section requilement. the
building drainage syster| ties into a storn sewer iocated to the south
of building complex.
27. F.i.re_ ex_tiryryishing s)'s_ten
ao Our drawings shovr a dry standpipe sysLem.
-r{
'h 1.;6{'sl-
been waived State of Coloracio.
e from coqe enrent is euclosed
c the local
buitding official by. subcontractor responsible for that port-ion of the
r,.rork .
JOHN A. LOVE
Govatnor
JAMES M. SHAFFER
Exsculivs Dltoctot
GnnrivENT oF LAE;oR nf evnLoYMENT
DtvtsroN oF LAtsoR, stF€IY sEclrcJv
2OO EAST NINTH AVENUE
DENVER, COLORAOO OO2O3
t97t
Jif#fi,n:;,.di
November 3, 1971
llr. Don n. I"larek
Ricc-i\tarelc-Ilarral & Associate:, Lnc.Consulting lingineers
2785 i'Iorth speer B1vd., Suite 140Denver, Colorado 80211
Dear llr. Ilarek:
IVe are j.n receipt of your lcrtter of November I, 1971 regardinginstallation of standpipe sl'stems in condominiums.
lfter a discuss: on of this ilatter with l'{r. Thomas Epson,Supervisor, Safi ty Inspectic,n Branch, it is our:opinion thatthis is acceptai le as out,Iiited in your letter. Iiowever, theFire Department and Building Department in your area must bethe final judge because of considerations of fire fighting ancllife safety.
If this office can be of further assistance, please feel freeto contact us.
Sincerelv($/r,O t\rr \r \Vt,tYAl"N,,D)-t\
F. I^l . Shepirerd\
Safety Inspector:
Fws/dr
,..':'.,,"
ii,r'. ; . 1,'j. : trcl)berd, i'afcty Iuspcctor
: ':i[cl:jr ltrsl:e ction t';ranch
Irivisiou oi Labor
ra|cty InsPcctiou ilirttrch
200 i:tst gth i;trecl
L,cnvel" Coloracio [0203
DEI'I :itw
ccl ii'1r.G Aococtatos
Novembcr 1' 19?1
llel Stanciplpc i:yetem in Coudomitrlums
SinccrelY,
Don [. Marelc
Lcar' 1.\'cB !
"i,iiis lciter rvill coniirm our tclcplroae coi'versation of Cctober 28, 19?1 , regar(l-
lug installatlon oi stanciplpcs ln r'"ulti-otoiy corioonrlnium unlto'
Gcircr.ally rvircn ii.C Conclonriulurn ttnits arc scrvcd fronr oulpicje s"alrs and outsitio
coiricioro, ihe units n'ray be icgi'.r'i'ie<i ao oinglc family cirvclllugs locatecl onc above tho
othc.r a'd, as euch, do uot reclulrc a vci.ticai stantlpipe syotent. If. on the otlrcr baudt
llie uoits ar.e apartm(Lts scrvecl *'li,.ir lnier'lor stalri an4 interlol corridors' a etaud-
plpc systcm rvould delioltely be rcclu['ed'
1.1:ccificall5r, ihe proScct vo are currctitly woliiing on ie a nrultJ-story condouriniuru
builiiag locaied on I:lnst Llonsheacl circlc in veiI, Coloraclo' lhto partLcular proJcct
rvill have c>ltcrlor. sts.irs and cxtcrior corriclofg ecrviug each of thc coodornlnium unlts'
Aioirg the iinc of rcaconing statcd abovc,- we aie proceocilng wttb ths desiStn of thie
proicct wiihout ihc tustallatton of a otanc\:ipc $ystem'
ia oui. tclcplroi.rc coitvergatloil of t:r:tobcr 28 you had lnclicatcd tirat you rvould tahc thle
item ulcler cousicleration anci aov! ;c usr of your ftndlngs. If yotrr findinge ars other
tbaai:ocribcdabovo,pleasocont,'ctussttllcear.lleetposelblotime.
Thanli you for your assistauce in 'lrio matter'
24 llarch 1972
Vail 21
Condominium - Commercial
Vall , LionrB Head, Colorado
3.
4.
ENDUM No. 3
1. Substitute:
2. De1ete!
8.
9r
10.
l'I.
12.
13.
74.
15.
Deleter
@ss:
s:
Substitute:
Substihrte:
Substitrrte r
Substitutel
Delete:
DeLete:one year maintenance requirement on elevator installation.
Substituts: . otj.s hydraulic passenger elevator #+tpA-2000 for Dover
5. Substitute:
elevator specified.
Aluminum wire on service gauges in lleu of copper
wire specified,.
Competlti're 91rade outlets and s$rltches wittr lvory metal
covers for that specified.
CompeLitive grade light fixtures for that origJ.nallyspecified. New fixtrrrea to conform wlth orlglnal ln
"general f,urrction and appearance,
Overhead llght fixtures in bedrooms.
One (1) switched dupler outlet @ each bedroqn.
Round roses for square @ all dor hardware.
Resldential grade butt;r (US 10 g) in lieu of that
specified.
Standard duty locks in lieu qf H. O. where us;d.
Round knobs @ all door hardware (uS IO B).
Insulation on breechinq.
5. Substituter
?. Substitutes
U/T, fype Class I'At' asphal t shingle roof i"ng . . .. Bird, Firescreen" or equal for fire retardant shlngles
as specified and detailed. Approxirnate welght of
asphalt shingles to be 325 1b. per 6cluare.
1/16" galvanj.zed sleeve on fireplace flues as detailed.
S ecure un-reinforced chirneys wi th adequate guy wires
to roof.
SilI cfocks as per lettei from Bickel Constructlon Co.
14 March 1972.
I'Flberglassicstr tub enclosure for that epeclfledr16. Subslituter
17. 9lg!gg: Gate valves to S-13.
18r Delete! Vents on fin hrbe radiatlon and uae posltlve bleedero
19. Delete: Access doorso
20. Delete: Gauges on plnmps.
?7, Su.bstitute: 6,0001000 BTLI boiler'for 810001000 Bn, boller.
22. Substi_tute: Paint grade birch doors @ exterlor and mahogany doora
@ interior for that specifJ-ed.
' 23. Substitute: D grade pine J.n lieu of C grade.
24. SubstitutEl gll..6tt x 2 !/2 finger jointed base in lieu of 1x3.
. 25. gggg: In storefront nse standard sil1 , International
window unit, er:posed door closers and.plain alumlnun
franes.
26. @tr: In storefront, raise sill up.from floor 16" with
concrete block to allovr for residential filr tube.
...27. !S!it"t"t ResldentiaL grede fin tube @ commercial areas for that
specified.
2e, !g!:!:lge: Fire rated (2 hr) 2 x 4 exposed grid ceiling @ corwnerclal,
space for that specified.
29. SES!!$1!g: I'tood frarne, wood siding suncreens and balcony raillnge(with extra structuraL steel framing) for pre-cast
concrete as shovm on drawings. See drawi.ng SD - Ifor revised de cails.
30. $$li!1$t Steel columns trnd concrete piJ.asters for pre-cast
concrete as shown on the drawings. See drawing SD-lfor 6teel colurn location, flreproofing and comection
details.
31. Deletei Waterproofing on walk deckg.
32. Deletet Sand ln party wal,ls.
33. Ig!g: Provide colored mortar at all masonry walls. Mortar
color to match block hue aa closely as poseible.
Vail 21 Building
Vail , Lionrs Head, Colorado
Page 1 of L
27 April 1972
ADDBiDIJI.I I'lo. 4
l. thanql:: Elevator heiqhts as shown on sheet A-13 from 16r-8'rto t1r-4r' ( above level6). Verlfy Ilr-4I dimensions
with elevator manufactu.rer.
2. DelctA Steel beans and 4f floor slabs in upper part of elevator
tower.
3. Delet,: 2r-8r' x 2r-8" access door ln north wall of elevator.
4. Deletg: Ladder nlngs on north hral-l of elevator.
5. @S3 6?' blod< walLE on exterLor balconies to 8( block(frachrred) .
t
DU[-A=G10,MODEL M
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Use froming detoils
shown ot right. Moke oll
meosurements from top of
{inished heorth, os fireploce
musl be elevoted to this
position. Woll covering moteriol
should come only io the inner edge
of f romed opening.
9T0R
@
coLL^\
-r
r-----1.
ROOF
FLASHINO
clt tMt{ EY
START€R
sEcTr ol{
2. Posilion fireploce so side flonges ore
flush with finished woll (see illustrotion
below). Secure to studs by ongle noiling through
perforoted spocers eoch side.
3. Instoll fcceplote over finished woll ond noil into ploce.
A non-cornbuslib le surround moteriol moy then be opplied.
A 6" minirnum widlh by 3/e" thick surround is required.
A speciol foceplote
ovoiloble. A f roming
for full mosonry
depth ot 241/2"
focing is
is required.
FRAXTE rorr:ltu behind
Log-lighter stub (72" pipe)
stud focing.
is used, recess fireploce l3lo"
{inish woll.
is locqted 7" obove finished heorlh ond 7" behind
Nole:\"/hen thit foceplote :-' :.(., tJ.t
t,t ") .- -.'. '' . ,l
v,l . \r,
- n., ,,. '
.l', i:' )
-,.-r .1i- :, .j
\-) j- .li .,
G ct .-:. 'cl"r\
(,
The Menlo fireploce hos been tested by independent tesiing loborolories ond is
opproved by Internotionol Conference of Building Ofriciols. Report No. 1802.6.
oPTt-oN/\L l-___1
22+- oFFsEr i::_-rt
Al.t M-2 A'iODEIS USE
CNLY DURA.GLO 9"
CHIMNEY (DG9)
I
II
to tEvEt of x€aiYli
DURA-\'ENT COIIPC IIATIOhE
OF CAIIFORNIA
O, BOX I28O _ 2525 EL CAMINO REAL
REDI.'OOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94064
PHONE: (415) 3*-29L2
P.
Litho in USA
EURA-GL@, UENt=e 2-Co
n
sroR,, L-lCOLLAR\
,r^rrrorT-
SPACER
CHIMNEY N
smnren z,] |sEc.o*ll
tJ
llooELs l,il R I M2-0L (coRNER oPENTNG,
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTION{i
Corner Model MENLO Fireploces
ore designoted by the letter "C"
of ter lhe model number "M2".
The letlers "L" ond "R" indicole
left ond right hond unils. Pic-
lured on this poge is r,A2-CR
(right end open). The fr :ming
ond woll surfocing moy b,. com-
pleted (right) before the fireploce
is inslolled, if desired. l: indi-
focing is qvoiloble. Dimension "A" is then 43tA" ond "8" 241h".
OPTIONAL
zz{ orrser
OFFSET A O
STRIP THE
THICI(NES3 OF
FINISHEO WALL
iMr .
@
coted below by the cut-o,voy drow-
ing, there is odequote rcom before
instolling foceplote to rerch in obove
fireploce cobinet ond gui,le chimney irrlo
ploce os it is lowered fro'n obove. Wl-en froming,
figure meosuremenls fronr finished heorth ond provide for
roising MENLO to heorth level. (Upper illustrolion). A non-combustible surround ol leosl 6"
wide is required on this model, The fcrceplote shown below is designed bosicolly for use
with tife. slole, gloss. morble, etc. A non-combustible heorlh ot leost 3/a" thick wifh the
the minimum dimensions shown obove is required on inside corner instollotions, When
corner fireploce is instolled on on oulside corner (L-shoped room), heorlh must extend ot
leost | 2" on eoch side of opening ond 20" lo lhe front. A speciol foceplote for full mosonry
I( OAS LOE LIGHTER
conNEcT loN
HEARTH AREA AI{D WALL ADJACENT TO
CLOSED ENO OF FIREI'LACG T'UST BE
COVERED VIITH A I{ ON - COMBUSTISLE
ITATERtAL AT LEAST 3/s,,tHtCK.
DURA-VENT CORPORATION
OF CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX t2a0 - 2525 EL CAMrr.lO REAL,
REOWOOD CITY, C;\LIFORNIA 94064
PHONE: (41s) 368"2912
n= 4t*
e. zzt
H= 37"
' -: -Rit^ Siles. , .,:r ci\iri:l'::':l-i
AtL M.2 MODEIS USE
ONI.Y DURA.GIO 9"
CHIMNEY (DGe)
t'5"titr
37"
1
I
I
I
A-_
,^:\;II
1lltltltll
ti f,
I
I
ilrq'tz
|"itt
_1
22{
_J
Ala\>a/
FIREPLACE TO LEVEL OF
Fl-54 Lirho in U.s.A.
I
i J"
Lonterence
lt
1j.'.
itt,,," \i t'r
I ntern atio n
-l
,1
of Building Officialsal
s360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD ' WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601
Itay L8, L972
1213) 699-0541
oFFrcgRs
PRESIOENT
PERRY C. TYREE
REGIONAI. BUILDING OFFICIAL
coLoRAoo sPFlINcS, coLoRADo
FIRST VICE.PRESIDENT
EUGENE B. PESTER
SIJ PERI NTENOENT, DEPARTMENT
OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
POMONA, CALIFORN IA
SECOND VICE.PRESIDENT
NEWELL POCK
CHIEF BU I LOING INSPECTOR
YAKIMA. WASHINGTON
TREASIJRER
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENOENT OF BUILOING
VERNON. CALIFORN IA
JUNIOR PASI PRESIDENT
TED E, DUKE
BU ILD ING OFFICIAL
BILLINGS. MONTANA
EXECU"TIVE DIRECTOR
T. H. CARTER
5360 S, WORXMAN MILL RD,
WH ITTIER. CAL LFORN IA
MANAGING D IRECIOR
JAMES E. BI HR
5360 S. WORKMAN MII-L RD.
wlllr-llER. cal-l FoRN la
DIRECTORS
GAYLORD C, DOWD
orREcfoR oF tNsPEc.rtoNs
KALAMAZOO, M ICH IGAN
DONALD A. ERICKSON
DIRECTOR
OEFARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF EU ILDING INSPECAOR
PIERCE COUNTY
TACOMA. WASH INGTON
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CHI EF BU ILD ING IN5PECTOF
MOIJNIAIN VIEW, CALI FORN IA
VICTOR L. TAUGHER
BU ILDING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
HAYWARD, CALIFORN IA
JACK D. vt/H ITE
BU ILOING CODE ENGINEER
KANs45 CITY, M ISSOU RI
VINCENT R. BIJSH
SUPERINTENOENT OF BUILDING
VERNON, CALIFORNIA
DICK T. JORDAN
DIRECTOR
BUILDING OEPARTMENI
AUSTIN,'TEXAS
RAY J. NOKES
BUILDING OFFICIAL
COUN'TY OF SANiA BARBARA
SANTA BARBARA. CALI FORNIA
OFFICES O' iHE
EXECUTIVE DIiECTOR
T. H. CARTER
MANAG INO DIRECIOR
JAMEA E. BIHR
'"8:t:iiiig"6l*
Pl-an Check No. 8552
TP..-?E"-L:Tffill#rT6%iE-ffi:1
L970 Uniforn Buil<Iing Code
STRUCTI'ML REVIEW
Ed Struble
Building Official
City of Vail
Box 100
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Struble:
Structural data has been
Uniform Building Code and
STRUCTI'RAL COMMENTS:
revier,red for compliance with the
our cofitrnents follow:
1. Special inspection in conformance with Section 305 is
required for the foll.owing work:
(a) Structural concrete where the design is based on
an ultimate compressive strength in excess of 2000
pounds per square inch.
(b) 4L1 welding except where done in the shop of an
approved fabricator. Note the extensive field weld-
ing including studs and decking.
The foundation investLgation report mentioned in p1-ans
was not included in data for:nrarded to us. It should be
submitted for review.
Des ign-vertical Analysis.
(a)Reference 8-L/2 by 1-1 design criteria sheet.
1) Tr^7enty-one-pound per square foot weight for 2-U2
inches of concrete fill on floor decking requires
100-pound per cubic foot flraximum density for con-
crete. General Note 2A on Sheet 51 of plans
should be clarified on this ooint.
2.
3.
-2-
ElastizeL is not considered a structural concrete in
the sense that allowable stresses can be used per
Tabl-e No. 26-D. The l-iquid foaming agent must be
fully justified as an admixture under ASTM C260-69 if
this is to be pursued. Idealite aggregate is per-
missible provided there is cornpliance with U.B.C.
Standard 26-5. (ASTM C330-60T). This cormnent is made
because of General Note No. 2A on Sheet Sl of plans
aod the possibility that the fill may act as struc-
tural slabs in the lateral design.
Floor live loads:
- A11 public corridors and public balconies, including
Ehose on the upper levels, require a 100-pound per
square foor live load. Table No. 23-A.
- Lease space on the first leveL shouLd be designed
for an approximate 1-00-pound per square foot live
load unless the specific use is noted on pLans.
See offices and stores in Table No. 23-A and third
paragraph of Section 2302 (b).
4) Subsequent calcuLations should refLect any revised
loading resulting from the above cormnents.
(b) Reference calculation Sheets 2 of 27 and 2 to 5 - Clarifi-
cation is needed on where this framing is noted on plans
since we cannot locate it on Sheets 55 or 57.
(c) Reference calculation Sheet 5 - Continuous beam should be
skip loaded in conformance with Section 2302 (c).
(d) Reference calculation Sheet L7 and General Note 4 on Sheer
sl-.
Plans should specifically state lightweight block.
Vertical No. 4 at 4 feet 0 inch on center and standard
Dur-O-lrlal alone at 8 inches on center do not conp1-y
r'rith Section 24L8 (j)-3. There is no assurance of wal-L
openings. Details do not always call for special rein-
forcement specified in calcul-ations.
3) l,ive l-oad reduction formul-a should be based on the basicrather than reduced l-ive Load in the denominator.
2)
3)
1)
2)
-3-
(e) Reference calculation Sheet 37
should comply with criteria in
note that existing lateral soil
should also consider the total
tion to the moment.
- Constrained base des ign
Section 2905 (f)-1. Also
pressure calculations
horizontat force in addi-
(f) Reference calcul-ation Sheets 42 to 47.
1) Use of column formula is predicated on ties and comply-
ing reinforcement, incLuding four rebars. Section
24L8 (k)-3.
2) Reducing column capacity by 50 percent for sma11 colrrnns
should inc lude re inforcement. ALso note that colrrnn
capacity must be reduced by another 50 percent for un-
inspected masonry per Table No. 24-H.
4. Lateral Des ign.
(a) Reference calculation Sheet 49 - Wind zone of 35 pounds per
square foot is required per your instructions. Calculations
should be revised accordingly.
(b) Reference calculation Street 50 - A more compl-ete lateral
analysis is reguired to properly substantiate the structural
system in resisting lateral 1oads. The following comtents
reflect some of the items in question. Reference to direc-
tions are based on the north arrow shown on plans rather
than directions used in the cal-culaEions.
1) Using Sections Dl2 and F/3 as typical examples of dia-
phragm connections to shear wall-s, there is no positive
connection. As now detailed, the steel deck welding to
the joist and the joist welding to base plates is the
only means of transfer. A continuous angle or similar
member paralleL and at the wall to transfer deck shear
is necessary. Reference is rnade to Cormnent 3 (a) 2) if
the conctete is used for diaphragm purposes.
2) Wheeling TensiLform 50 is not approved for use as a dia-
phragm. See the enclosed research recomnendation. An
approved deck should be used or the concrete fill should
comply. For the Latter, doweling to the wal-1 will be
nece s sarv .
3)
4)
s)
6)
7)
-4-
The lateral analysis in the north-south direction
vithin reference Lines D1r G, 3 and 5 appears quite
critical fron the roof to the second 1eve1. tr0111
on Line 5 should be checked for axiaL compression
due to overturning forces plus the dead and live
loads supported.
AlLowable shear in masonry shear wa11s is limited
to 20 pounds per square inch on the net area based
on Table No. 24-H, Section 2303 and uninspected
mas onry. Higher shear stresses shouLd be based on
horizontal- reinforcement acting as stirrups in re-
sisting all- shear. Dur-O-Wal and similar wire rein-
forcement cannot be used for this purpose.
The major change in vertical shear-resisting elements
between the first and second 1eve1s require a detailed
analysis to determine whether second f 1-oor diaphragm
connecEions to walls are adequate for the redistribu-
tion of 1ateral forces betlteen waL1s. The redistribu-
tion assumes a structural concrete fill in conjunction
with the steel deck. If a nonstructuraL fill is used'
a tributary diaphragm analysis similar to wood is re-
quired which would negate any redistribution of shear
at the seoond Level. The actual response of a non-
structural fiLl on steel decking would be somewhere
betrtTeen the two l imits .
Overturning forces should be properly considered on
al"1 shear walls. While there might not be uplift'
axiaJ. compressive stresses will aLso result and should
be cornbined with axial stresses resulting from dead
and live 1oads. Wa11s and foundation soil pressures
shoul-d be checked.
Using DetaiL FlZ as an example, the precast coltrnn
cannot be used to resist overturning forces in the
wa11 because there is no means of transferring the
force across the cold joint with a continuous key.
If the logic is used that the connection is u leces-
sary since Ehe c oh:rnns contain the wa1l- and prevent it
fforn rrcartwhee l ingrt, the columns must then be justi-
fied for flexuraL stresses in resisting this force.
6.
-)-
No corments have been made on the parking structure calcula-tions since they are not a part of this report.
Plans .
(a) Reference General Note 44 - Stone aggregate concrete
should be clarified as to max imr:rn aggregate size, etc.
Reference is made to U.B.C. Srandard No. 24-24-70 (ASjl{ C404)
where maximum is limited to one-half inch. Sieve analvsisis al-s o required.
(b) Details and sections where diaphragm connections requirecLarification per Comnents 4 (b) 1) and 2) are as follows:
1) Details A to D on Sheet 2.
2) Details E and F on Sheet 53.
3) DetaiLs D, E and G on Sheer 54.
4) Derail H,/5.
(c) Reference El 2 arrd A/5 - netaining wa11 design should befurnished and should consider hydrostatic pressures unless
back wa1L drainage is provided. Al"so see Comtrent 3 (e).
(d) Reference C/ 3 and. E/5 - Jusrificarion is required for anchor-
age in reference to Section 2313.
(e) Reference Details C/ 3, D/3, s/4 and J to Ll 4. Jusrificationis required on how precasE fascias and connections resistwind 1oads, both lnward and outward. Using Section D/3 as
one example, unless the panel is capable of spanning 24 feet
horizontaLLy between perpendicular walls, it must cantiLever
frorn the floor deck. Connection, as a cantilever, wouldthen require justification for moment and shear.
(f) Reference DetaiLs D and El 4 - CLarification is needed on
how continuity of vertical qra1l reinforcement is maintainedat steel beams.
(g) Reference Detail E/5 - Clarification of verrical waLl rein-forcement connection to the steel- beam is needed.
-6-
(h) Reference Detail C/5 - Connection to concrete requiresjustification by Table No. 26-I.
(i) Reference 5th and 6th leveL framing plans - WalL on LineF, 5tb 1eveL; and C, 6th leveL shoul_d be justified forlateral- support at openlngs. Same is true for steel beamseast of these openings for compression fi.ange support.
A'L1- data is being hel-d pending further instructions frmr you. Ifinstructions are not received, data wilL be returned in 90 days in
conformance with Section 302 (b).
In c onf omance with existlng policies, we wil-!. not discuss thisletter with anyone other than fron your department unless permissionis specificaL1-y granted by you.
Please feel free to contact us if there are any questions.
Yours very truly,
IMERNATIONAL C CAIFERENCE
TJK:JN:hb
Koyamatsu
Plan Check Engineer
International Conference of Building Officials
5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD ' WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601
June 12, L972
Ed Struble
Building Official
City of Vail
Box 1.00
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Struble:
(213) 699-0541
OFFICEA OF THE
EIECUTIVE DIRECTORT. H. CARTER
ltaNAGtxo otiEcToi
JAMEg E, BIHR
"3:t:ti.ig8l"'
Pl-an Check No. 8552
Project: Vail 21
Seismic Zone No. I
1970 Uniform Building Code
STRU TURAL REVIEW
OFFICERS
PRESIDENT
PERRY C. TYREE
REGIONAL BU LLDING OFFICIAL
COLORADO SPRIN6S, COLORAOO
FIRSI VICE.PRESIDENT
EUGENE B. PESTER
SUPERIN'TENOENT, DEPARTMENT
OF EU ILDING ANO SAFETY
POMONA, CALIFORN!A
SECONO VICE-PRESIDENT
NEWELL POCK
CH IEF BUILOING INSPECTOR
YAKIMA. \l!'|ASHINGAON
.IREASIJ RER
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINIENDENT OF BU ILOING
VERNON, CALIFORN IA
JUN IOR PAST FRESIDENT
TEO E. DUKE
BIJ ILO ING OFFICIAL
BILLINGS, MONIANA
EXECU'TIVE OIFECTOR
T. H. CARTER
5360 S. WORKMAN MILL RO
u/HITTIER. CALI FORN IA
MANAGI NG OIRECTOR
JAMES E. BIHR
5360 S. l/\|ORKMAN MILL FID.
v\/H ITIIER. CALIFORN IA
OIRECTORS
GAYLORD C. OO\,VO
DIFECTOR OF INSPECTIONS
KALAMAZOO, M ICHIGAN
DONALD A. ERICKSON
OIRECTOR
DEPAR'TMENT OF INSPECIIONS
MINNEAFOLIS. MINNESOTA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF BU ILOING INSPECTOR
PIERCE COUNTY.IACOMA. WASHINGION
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CHIEF BU ILOING INSPECTOR
MOUNIAIN VIEll|, CALIFORNIA
VICTOR L. TAUGHER
EU ILDING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF ALAMEOA
HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA
JACK D. WHITE
BU ILOING COOE ENG INEER
KANSAS CITY. M ISSOURI
VI NCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENOENT OF EUILDING
VERNON. CALIFORNIA
OICK T, JOROAN
DI RECTOR
BI] ILOING DEPARTMENT
AU6.IIN. TEXAS
RAY J. NOKES
EU ILOING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF 5AN'TA BAREARA
SANTA BAREARA. CALIFOBNIA
This Letter supercedes our structural review letter for
the subject project, dated May 78, 1972. The structural
data has been reviewed for compliance with the Unlform
Buildlng Code and our cqnments folLow:
STRUCTUML COIIMEMS:
1. Special inspectlon in conformance nrith Section 305 is
required for the follovring work:
(a) Structural concrete where the design is based on
an ultimate cmrpressive strength in excess of
2000 pounds per square inch.
(b) A11 wei.ding except where done in the shop of an
approved fabricator. Note the extensive field
welding inc luding studs and decking.
2. The foundation lnvestigation report mentioned in pLans
was not included in data forwarded to us. It should
be submiEted for review.
3. Combustibl.e roof construction does noc meet require-
ments of Type II construction. Dead Loads for a non-
combustible one-hour fire-resistive consE,ruccion with
a fire retardant roof covering shoul-d be justified for
the 19 pounds per square foot used ln design.
4. Structural changes will be required to corply with exit
conditions mentioned in Nonstructural Comment No. 2 (a)
of our letter dated May Ll, 7972.
-2-
5. Design-vertical Analysis.
(a) Roof joists per ca1-culation Sheet 2 requires steel joist
12H5 at 2-foot c€nEers where spans are 24 feet. Framing
plan on Sheet 56 shows 5 each, L2I14, between Lines 1-2
and 2-3. Clarification is required, See aLso, 6 1eve1
frarning p1an. Note also that any change resulting fron
Conment No. 3 ab ove should be considered.
(b) Floor Live Loads:
1) A11 public corridors and pubLic balconies, incLuding
those on the upper 1eveLs, require a L00-pound per
square foot live load. Table No. 23-A. Roof joists
1-2H6 spanning 24 feet have a live load capacity of
1-55 pounds per foot. With spacing at 2-foot centers,
a 200-pound per foot capacity is required at exlt
balconies. See, for example, 6 1evel franing plan,
Sheet S6. Note that Ln accordance with Sheet 8 of
calculations 12H6 spanning 24 feet should be spaced
at l8-inch centers. Balcony beams shouLd also be
redesigned for 1-00-pound per square foot live 1oad.
2) Lease space on the first 1evel shouLd be designed
for an approximate 1-00-pound per square foot live
load unless the specific use is noted on plans. See
offices and stores in Table No. 23-A and third para-
graph of Section 2302 (b),
(c) Sheet 5 of calculacions specify I,t16X31 roof beam at Line 5
beEween B and C. Plans show WL6X26. Clarification is re-
ques ted.
(d) Design for W12X58 on Sheec 13 of calculations accounts for
concentrated loads and roof and floor loads imposed from
above but disregards dead load of 8-inch concrete block
rral-ls extending for four levels above. Clarification is
reque s Eed.
(e) Reference calculation Sheet 14 and General Note 4 on Sheet
sl'
1) PLans should specifically state lightweight bl-ock.
-3-
2) Vertical No. 4 at 4 feet 0 inch on center and
standard Dur-0-Wa1 aLone at 8 inches on center
do not comply with Sections 24L8 (j)-3. There
is no assurance of wall openings. Details do
not alvays caLl for special reinforcement speci-
fied in calculations.
(f) Reference Sheec 15 of calculations. Third 1eve1 floor
beam is supporting rnasonry walLs frqn four level-s rather
than three at the north wing.
(g) Design should be provided for concrete beam shown on
Sheet 57.
(h) Calculation Sheet No. 21 specified a W10X25 roof beam
at Line 2 near 81. Plans show W10X21. Clarificatlon is
required.
(i) Plans shoul-d clarify locarion of W10X33 ridge beam be$reen
Lines B and C cmrputed on Sheet 25 of calculations.
6, LateraL Des ign.
(a) Reference calcuLation Sheet 48-5L: I'Iind zone of 35
pounds per square foot is required per your instructions.
Calculations should be revised accordingly.
(b) Reference calculation Sheets 52-57. A more conpLetelateral anaLysis is required to properly substantiate the
structural system in resisting lateral loads. The follols-
ing corurents reflect some of the ltems in question.
1) Using Sections D/2 and f/3 as typical exaurples of
diaphragm connections to shear wa1Ls, there is no posi-
tive connection. As now detailed, the steel deck weld-
ing to the joist and rhe joist welding to base plates
are the onLy means of transfer. A continuous angle or
simllar member paraL1-e1 and at the wall to transfer
deck shear is necessary.
2) Wheeling Tensilform 50 is not approved for use as a
diaphragm. See the encl-osed research recormendation.
An approved deck should be used or the concrete fiLl
should cornply. For the latter, doweling to the walLwill be necessary.
3)
4)
s)
6)
7)
-4-
The lateral anal-ysis in the north-south direction
within reference Lines Dl, G, 3 and 5 appears quite
critical from the roof to the second 1evel. Wal1
on T,ine 5 should be checked for axial conpression
due to overturning forces plus the dead and live
loads supported.
Allowable shear in masonry shear walls is limited
to 20 pounds per square inch on the net area based
on Table No, 24-H, Section 2303 and uninspected
masonry. Higher shear stresses should be based on
horizontal reinforcement acEing as stirrups in re-
sisting all shear. Dur-O-Wal and similar wire
reinforcement cannot be used for this purpose.
The major change in vertical- shear-resisting ele-
ments between the first and second Leve1s require
a detailed analysis to determine whether second
floor diaphragm connections to walLs are adequate
for the redistribution of lateral forces between
wa11s. The redistrlbution assumes a structuraL con-
crete fill in conjunction with the steel deck. If
a nonstructural fill is used, a tributary diaphragm
analysis similar to wood is required which would
negate any redistribution of shear at the second
level-. The actual response of a nons truc tural- fill
on steel decking would be somewhere becween the trto
1 irnit s .
Overturning forces should be properLy considered on
all shear waL1s. while there might not be uplift,
axial compressive stresses will also resulE and
shoul-d be combined rrith axial stresses resulting
from dead and Live Loads including snow Loads. I'lalls
and foundation soil pressures should be checked.
Using DetaiL F/2 as an example, the precast column
cannot be used to resist overturning forces in the
wa11 because there is no means of transferring the
force across the cold joint rrith a continuous key.
If tbe logic is used that the connection is unnecessary
since the col-urnns contain the wal- l. and prevent it frornttcartwheel ingtr, the coLurms must then be justified for
flexural stresses in resisting this force.
7 . Pl.ans .
(a) Reference General Note 4A - Stone aggregate concrete
should be clarified as to max imr.m aggregate size, etc.
Reference is made to U.B.C. Standard No. 24-24-70
(AS114 C404) where maximum is limited to one-ha1f inch.
Sieve analysis is also required.
(b) DetaiLs and sections where diaphragm connections re-
quire cl-arification per Comnents 4 (b) 1) and 2) ate
as follows:
1) Details A to D on Sheet 2.
2) Details E and F on Sheet 53.
3) Details D, E and G on Sheet 54.
4) Detail H/5.
(c) Reference E/2 and A/5 - netaining wal1 design should be
furnished and shoul-d consider hydrostatic pressures unLess
back waLl drainage is provided. Also see Conrnent 3 (e).
(d) Reference C/3 ar.d E/5 - Justiflcation is required for
anchorage in reference to Section 23L3.
(e) Reference Derails Cl3, Dl 3, E/ 4 and J to Ll 4. Jusrifica-tion is required on how precast fasciae and connections
resist wind 1oads, both inward and outward. Using Section
O/3 as one exampl-e, unLess the panel is capab1e of spanning
24 feet horizontally between perpendicuLar walls, it musE
cantilever from Ehe f l-oor deck. Connection, as a canti-
lever, vould then require justification for rnoment and
shear.
(f) Reference Details D and E/4 - Clarification is needed on
how continuity of vertical waLl reinforcement is maintained
at steel beams.
(g) Reference Detail E/5 - CLarification of vertical wall re-
inforcement connection to the steel beam is needed.
-6-
(h) Reference Detail C/5 - Connection to coocrete requires
justification by Table No. 26-I.
(i) Reference 5th and 6th 1eve1 framing plans - Wa1l on
Llne F, 5th 1eveL; and C, 6th level should be justified
for lateral support at openl.ngs. Same is true for steel
beams east of these openings for cornpression flange sup-
port.
A1-1 data is being heLd pending further inscructions from you. If
instructions are not received, data rriLl be returned in 90 days in
confotmance with Section 302 (b).
?l"ease feel free to contact us if there are any questions.
Yours very truly,
IMERI{AT IONAL CONFERSNCE
OF BUILDTNG OFFICIALS
TJK:hb
. Koyamatsu
ef ?1an Check Engineer
o ?/Gdil /4
MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION ril-,
Jurisdiction of
Applicant to complete numbercd spaces only.zl
t[se: ertrcn:o sxe:rlI oE3Ci.
ZIP PXONE
I. CENSE NO.I P*
AF CH I TEC'T Oi O E5IGN ER VAIL ADOFESS
'
PHONE !ICENSE NO.
ENGINEEi MA|L AODR€S5 PHONE
MA|L ADDR€ss EiANCH
USE OF 6UIIOING
8 classof work: Xtt* EADolTloN DALTERATI0N n REPAIR
Type of Fuel: Oir ! Nat. Gas E[r lPC. E
PERMIT FEES
Type of EquipmentSPECIAL CONOITIONS:
Air Cond. Units- H.P. Ea.
ion Un its-H,P. Ea.
Gas Fired A.C. Units-Tonnsoe Ea.
Forced Air Systems--B.T.U. M Ea.
Gravity Systems-B.T.U. M Ea.PLANS CI]ECK€O AY
F loor Furnaces-B.T.U. M
Wall Heaters- B.T.U. M
Unit Heaters-B.T.U.NOTIC E
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 OAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONEO FOR A
PERIOD OF 12O DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCEO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REAO ANO EXAMINED THISAPPLICATION ANO KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND COR RECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS ANO ORDINANCES GOVERNING THISTYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEOHEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT OOES NOTPRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THEPROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATINGCONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
3I6'F1IUF€ O' CONTRAC.tOI OF AUTHORIZEO AGENT
Ventilation Fan
Air Handlim Unii-
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SP
PERcK. M.O. CASH
WHITE _ INSPECTOR CANARY _ AU DIT PIN K _ APPLICANT GOLDE N FIOD _ TEMP. FILE
tnternational Conference of Building Officials
-REc'%
4, 'O
' t &,r.
5360 MILL ROAD WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601
9, t972
Ed SrrubLe
Building Officlal
City of Vail
Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Struble:
Plan Check No. 8552
YaiI 2L
STRUCTI'RAL RECItrCK
I{e have received a Letter from the engineers in ansrter to
the questions raised in our letter dated June 12, L972.
The following coments are listed in the same nrnnerical
sequence to that letter and t.o the engineerrs letter dated
JuLy 2L, 1972. The cmnrents of the engineer are weLl
taken. Our cournents concerning the calculations are made
where we do have reason to believe that there is not con-pliance. Tn order to properly review structural plans there
must be calculations prepared except where standard items
are involved. Our response to revised data submitted indi-
cates why the questions lrere raised.
STRUCTI'ML CCMMENTS:
1, (a) and (b) For your information.
2. The soil report indicates that the nature of the soil
is such that a quallfied person should inspect the foot-
ing excavations prior to pouring the foundation. Tt is
highly recommended that this procedure be fo1lowed.
3. Comrent remains. No plans showing this change were sub-
nit ted.
4. This cqfiment should have made reference to Nonstructural
Cormtrent No. 21 (a) instead of 2 (a) as indicated in our
letter of June 12. We understand that the architect has
applied to your buil-ding department for a variance on
this issue.
(2't3l 699-0541
nOFFICERS
FRESIDENT
PERRY C. TYREE
REGIONAL BUILDING OFFICIAL
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
F I FISI VICE-PRESIOENT
EUGENE B. PESTER
SIJPERINTENOENT, DEPARTMENT
OF BU ILD ING AND SAFETY
FOMONA, CALI FORN IA
SECONO VICE.PRESIOENT
NEWELL POCK
CHIEF BU ILDING INSPECTOR
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
TFIEASURER
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENDENT OF EU ILDI NG
VERNON. CALIFORNIA
J UN IOR FAST PRESIOENT
TED E. DU KE
BU'LDING OFFICIAL
BILLINGs, MONTANA
EXECUTIVE DI RECTOR
T. H. CARTER
5360 S. WORKMAN MILL RD.
WH ITTIER CAL IFORN IA
MANAG ING O IRECTOR
JAMES E. B IHR
5360 S, WORKMAN MILL RO.
l,lr'H ITTIER. CALIFORNIA
DIRECTORS
GAYLORD C. DOl/l|D
OIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS
KALAMAZOO, M ICH IGAN
OONALO A. ERICKSON
OIRECTOR
DEPARTM ENT OF INSPECTIONS
M INNEAPOLIs, M INNESOTA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECIOR
PIERCE COUNIY
TACOMA, WASHINGTON
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CH IEF BUILOING INSPECTOR
MOUNTAIN VIE\/l/, CAT.IFORNIA
VICTOR L. TAUGHER
TUILOING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF ALAMEOA
HAYWARO. CALIFORN IA
JACK D. v,HITE
EUI LD ING CODE ENGINEER
XANSAS CITY. M ISSOURI
VINCENT R. BUSH
sUPERIN rENOENT OF BU ILOING
VERNON, CALI FOFINIA
DICK T. JORDAN
DIRECTOR
BUILDING OEPARTMENT
a us'r r N, TExas
RAY J. NOKES
BUILDING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF SANTA EANBARA
SANTA BARBARA, CALI FORNIA
OFFICES OF IHE
EXECUTIVE OIRECAOR
T. H. CARTER
MANAGINO DIRECTOR
JAMES E. BIHR
.rECHNICAL OIRECTOR
D. R. }I/ATSON
-2-
5. (a) Comment satisfied for 1oft.
(b) l-) Cotrment satisfied.
2) Our corrnenE remains.
(c) Comnent satisfied. The engineer states that the joists
span 14 feet instead of 20 feet indicated in the calcula-
tions .
(d) Ctrment satisfied.
(.)Comnent sat isfied.
Comlent remains. The requirement in the Code is not
necessari1y a question of stress in the reinforcement.
(t) (e) (h) (i( CorrnenEs satisfied.
6. (a) Comnent satisfied. We have been informed by you that your
wind load requirement should be for a 3O-pound per square
foot wind zone instead of the 35 pounds in your original
ins t ruc t ions .
(b) 1)Coment satisfied. The problem, however, is how the
shear in the concrete or steel deck is transferred to
the joist chord at the wa1l, At 254-pound per joist,,
the deck weld at the joist appears sufficient.
Comnent remains. An application was made r'o the ICBO
Research Conmittee for consideration of Tensilform as
a diaphragrn in 1967 vith the same data presently sub-
mitted for this project. The request ltas not granted
due to lack of sufficient data. Subsequently, data
nas submitted for Tensilform 125 and 75 decks vrith 2-
inch lighEweight concrete fiLl which were approved in
May, L969. These decks are covered in the current
Research Reconrnendation No. 2259. In viev of the
sequence of events we are not in a position to state
that our original conunent is satisfied. Diaphragm
shears are admittedly 1ow but a1loltance of the Tensil-
form 50 decking as a diaphragm without sufficient data
wouLd be inequitable to other proponents who are re-
required to supply substantiating data.
1)
2)
2)
-3-
3) Comnent renains. The cal"culations were based on an
uncracked section where tension does not exist due
to the overturning moment. Vertical rebars require
check on area to resist this tension.
4), 5), 6) and 7) Colrments remain.
7. (a) Cotrment remains.
(b) (c) (a) (e) (r) (e) Comrents remain.
(h) Corunent remains in reference to a shear friction theory
justification for the fol-lowing reasons. Reference is
nade to the encl-osed ACI c onmentary on this subject.
1) Calculations show that there are six No. 4 rebars.
Detail C./5 indicates four No. 4 rebars, two of which
are not normal to the assuned shear force.
2) Anchorage for the assr.rned reinforcernent should be
justified. The detail if velding is intended should
consider aL1 eccentric conditions. Other means of
connecEion also require justification.
3) Coefficient of frictlon should be of .7 in lieu of
the 1.4 used.
4> Use of the shear friction theory which is being eon-
sidered for incl-usion in the 1973 Uniform Building Code
is for your approval under Section 106.
A11 data is being held pending furEher instructions from you. If
instructions are not received, data wllL be returned in 90 days in
conformance with Section 302 (b).
?lease feel free to contact us if there are any questions.
Yours very truLy,
IMERNAT IOT{AL CONFERENCE
Koyarnat su
Plan Check Engineer
TJK:JN:hb
o
THE TAG ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
82O sixteenth stneet suite 31O
denven, colonado 8O2O2
(3O3) 534-6905
14 July 1972
i1r. Ed S truble
Building Officj-al
'rolrn of var_t
3ox 100
Vail , Col-orado 8L557
Dear Ed:
We have receivd the second re-check for the Vail 21 Condominiums and
Conmercial Building fron f. C. B. O., dated JuIy 7, L972, In revj-ewing
the reniai:rir:g connents, it appears that further correspondence with
I. C. B. Oo regarding this matter can now be curtailed. Naturally,
it is a more convenien t operation to communicate with you personally...
and it appears that the remaining comments on the I. C. B. O. re-check
can be settled between the two of us.
Thank you for your he1p.
Theodor
TAG/mg
A. Grossman, Jr.
K[t\'o)
..,. 'o,lllL t r ez2Y
QgrED
-t
Meeting Called fo 0rder
A. The meeting was called to
Building.
B. The fol lowing members were
Young and Strub le ( ex-of f i
C. The following guests were
Dick Brown, Ted Grossman,
John Gavin.
order at 9:20 in
present: Messrscio).
p resent: Messrs.
Me I Sorenson, B ud
1,,)o'
the Mun ic ipa I
. Knox, Viele,
Ch uck Rosenqu ist,
lnr:nr-o anrl
r"t.
I
I
L-
BOARD 0F ZoNtNG, APPEALS AND EXAMINERS
MINUTES OF IIEETING
J une 8, i912
l.
tl 0ld Bus iness
A. Case Z-5-72 - \antage Poinf request for l0r setback variance
on south property line in lieu of l5f . This setback was
discussed at the last meeting and a preliminary variance was
granted. Mr. J im Vie le mad a motion that the variance begranted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Knox and passed
unan imous lv bv the Board.
B. LionsHead Centre (Sink Building)Mr. Bud Lorance met
informallv w ith the Board to d i scuss all items which must
be corrected bef o -e a permanent certif i cate of 0ccupancy
can be issued by the Building Department. Mr. Lorance
commenced by giving the Board some background on this build-
ing which was started in 1969. The building design was
started before the property was with in the Town limits and
was then annexed. The f irsf plan check was made by Mr. Charlie
Bynum in August ol 1969 at the time of annexation. On
September 3, 1969 Mr. Bvnum issued the first letter of non-
conformities on this project. There ensued a disagreement
between the arch i tect (14r. Sink) and Mr. Byn um as to the
n o n - co n f o r m i t i e s . The plans were then sent to 1.C.8.0.in November of 1969 which was also returned in November.
Mr. Sink sent his reply -fo ihe Town of Vail with a request
for a hearing in December of .,969. More information was sent
to 1.C.B.0. in December,. and on December ll a second review
was received from l.C.B.O. 0n January I, 1910 Mr. Sink met
w ith the Board of Appea ls and many var iances we re granted.
Construction was terminated on March 3l and Mr. Lorance was
retained by legal counsel on April 24, 1970 to review plans
in order to solve some of the prob lems. Work was commenced
aga in on J une 4, 1970 at wh ich time a new building permit was
issued as the original pe rm it had expired. In meet ings with
Mr. Bynum, lv1 r. Lorance and he worked out solutions to some
of the problems and a letter was jointly written by the two
wh ich was dated J une 4, | 970 ( copy attached ) . Nea r the end
of the project, Mr. Bynum retired and 1,1r. Struble made the
f inal inspect ion so that a ceriif icate of occupa ncy could be
issued. At that time he wrcte a letter to Vail Associates
dated December 31, 1970 (copy attached), The items on this
lette r were d iscussed with the Boa rd so that everyth ing can
be reconciled and a certif icate of occupancy issued. By item:
(l) The second siair will be insta I led from the exit ba lcony.(2) The windows as installed do comply (Mr. Struble will
check). (5) Variance granted on th is item on January 8, ,970.
(
'r' Tiltlilil;l
,|,
i'
I
Page 2
Board of Zoning, Appeals and Examiners
Minutes of Meeting - June 8, 1972
(4) This item was accepted by Mr. Bynum in letter of June 4
and Mr. struble aqreed that it canrt be remddied at this Time.
(5) Same comment as (4).(6) Mr. Lorance has recommended
thai th is vent i I at ion be insta I led. (7) Th is item has been
corrected. (B) Var iance granted on January B, 1970. (9) Has
been corrected. ( l0) Mr. Lorance pointed out that these
bathrooms are quasi-public, but he will recommend the instal-
lation of tile. ( ll) Has been corrected except one hole
where there was a frozen sprinkler. (lr2) Will be covered by
a separate building permit when this area is finished.(ll) Mr. 'Lorance will be recommending th at th is i tem be
installed. '(14) llr. Strub le will accept th is item as is
because it is not a hea lth or safety hazard. (15) Has been
corrected. ( l6) Variance granted on January B, 1970.
( l7) Has been corrected. Mr. Strub le then stafed thaf he
would make a f inal inspection when it is requested and if
all of the items are satisfactorily completed, he wi ll issue
a Conditional certificate of occupancy. He does not feel
that he can put his signature of a certificate without some
qua I if icat ions.
lll. New Business
A. Case B-4-72 - Yai | 2l application for va r iance not to con-
sider lofts as a story. The architect, Mr. Ted Grossman,
presenred drawings to clarify loft a rea. He feels the units
should be considered as single family dwel ling since there
is f ire separat ion and the occupancy load will be low'
Mr. Grossman then went on to explain that he had contacted
both the Denver and Aurora building departments concern ing
lofts and they both permit larger than l/3 floor area with-
'out requiring the extra exif. lt was the consensus of the
Board that the nature of use of a con dom in i um in Vail is
much d i fferent than that in a large c ity and fhat occupant
loads tend to be much larger in a resort area. lhey also
.pointed out that they as a Board, cannot change the Code,
but can on ly approve a lte rn ate methods of accomplish ing the
same thing. Mr. Grossman and Mr. Struble differed in opinion
on the def inition of mezzan ine and what is included in fhe
calculation of the mazzan ine area and allowab le area. A
ca I I was then made fo 14r. Koyamatsu of | .C.8.0. to clarif y
th is point. lt was then determ ined fhat they must inc I ude
all f loor space in fhe loft a rea, inc lud ing the closets and
bathroom; and that the area to be used for the l/3 calculation
can include only rooms that the loft opbns directly onto,
those that are 50/ open to that area and not the bathrooms,
etc. that Mr. Grossman was us ing for his calculation.
The Board then discussed several solutions to the problem of
a second exit from the loft area. lt was the opinion of the
Boa rd that some safety precautions we re necessa ry in th is
case. A motion was made by Mr. Young that the mezzanines
be cons i de re d as a nothe r story, but tha t the lofts be allowed
as planned provided that: smoke and heat alarm systems are
installed in lofts and that either a sprinkler system or
a second door to the roof be p rovi ded in addition to the
smoke and heat alarm systems. Mr. Grossman is to inform board
t-..,.
tIt
I
I
J
"li
r'
Page 5
Board of Zoning,
Minutes of Meeti
Appea ls and
ng - June 8,
Examiners
| 972
(
(
tv.
I n wri ti ng wh ich of the two
and also mus t s ubm it revised
by Mr. Knox and approved by
vote .
Case Z-6-72 (Prel iminary Hearing) - Bank of Vail request for
7 l/21 setback in front on Main Vail Road in lieu of l5r.
Mr. Me I Sorenson presented the draw ings to the Board and
explained that the only parts of the bui lding that would
project into the requi red setback are the p lanter boxes
and a ba lconv and door canoDV. The Board informed Mr. Sor-
enson that they will recommend aPproval of the variance since
there will be at least 501 between the Bank and any other
buildings on that side.
Case B-5-72 - (Preliminary Hearing) - Apollo Park request to
use habitab le basement space as laundry rooms and recreaf ion
room and not have it considered a story when determining the
type of constructi on. They have agreed fo use a concrete
occupancy separation between basement and remainder of each
bui lding and to continue wet standpipes into basement. The
Board wi ll recommend approval of the variance as there is
no safety hazard involved.
Case 7-7-72 - fhree Willow Place (Preliminary Hearing)
Request for roof to overhang tract land, Bishop rs land and
Edelweiss land, and to allow F.A.R. to exceed l:00 to l:00
by approximately l%. The Board reviewed previous variances
for th is project and noted that 4 | setback variances were.
granted for stair area but that there were to be no pro-jections closer than 4r of the properfy lines. The other
corner of the building in question which has no setback from
Fhe tract land has not been gi ven a variance. The Boardrsposition is that we cannot g rant the requested va r i ances as
it is not within its power to do so. The Board cannot change
the F.A.R. requirement--this must be done by amending the
Zoning Ordinance by the Board of Trustees. The Board cannotgive permiss ion for a building to encroach upon otherrs
p rope rty .
Othe r Busi ness
A. Contractorrs licenses approved
Submifted by,
TO|,{N OF VAIL
G, APPEALS AND EXAMINERS
4.cd .
a lte rnat i ves he p I ans to use ,olans. The motion was seconded
the Boa rd w i th one d i ssent i ng
B.
c.
D.
tti'
I
!..r
t.
t
{
dw
e
tnternational Conference of Building Officials
5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601
r972
(213) 599-0541
OFFICERS
PRE6IDENT
PERRY C. TYREE
REGIONAL EUILDING OFFICIAL
COLORAOO SPiIINGS, COLORADO
FIRST VICE.PREEiIOENI
EUGENE B. FESTER
€UPERINTENOEN'I, DEPARTMENT
OF EUILDING ANO SAFEIY
POt\aONA. CALIFORNIA
SECONO VICE.FRESIDENT
NE\IVELL POCK
CHIEF EU ILOIN6 INSPECTOR
YAKIMA, WASHIN6T0N
TREAs;URER
VINCENT R, EU6H
€UPERINTENDENT OF BUILDI NG
VERNON. CALIFORNIA
JUNIOR PASA PRESIDEN'
TED E. DUKE
BUILD ING OFFICTAL
BILLIN6S, MONTANA
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
T, H. CARTER
535O S. WORKMAN MILL RO.
WH IITIER. CALIFORN IA
MANAGING OIFIECTOR
JAMES E. BIHR
5360 5. WORXMAN MILL RO.
WH ITTIEF. CALI FORN IA
DIRECTORS
GAYLORD C. DOWD
DIRECTOR OF INSPECIIONS
KALAMAZOO, MICH IGAN
DONALD A. ERICKSON
OIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
MINNEAPOLI6T MINNEAOAA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF BU ILDING INSPECTOR
P!ERCE COUNTY
TACOMA. WASH ING'ON
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CHIEF BU ILDING INSPECTOR
MOUNTAIN VIEl.|, CALIFORNIA
VICTOR L TAUGHER
BUILDING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
HAY\vARD, CALIFORN IA
JACK D. WHITE
BUILDING CODE ENGINEER
KANSA5 CITY, M ISSOURI
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUFERINTENDENT OF BUILDING
VERNON, CALTFORNIA
DICK T, JORDAN
D IRECYOR
BUILOING DEPARTMENT
AUSTIN, TEXAS
RAY J. NOKE6
EUILOING OFFICIAL
COUNYY OF SANYA EARIARA
gANTA BANBARA, CALIFORNIA
Plan Check No. 8552
Vail 21 Condqninfu:m and
C orrne rc ia 1
SECOND RECIIECK
Ed Strubl-e
Building OfficialCity of Val1
Box l-00
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear }lr, Struble: ]
Revised data for the above project io tt" form of a letter
prepared by the architect has been reviewed with referenceto our Letters of May Ll and June 8, L972, and to thearchitect ts letter dated June 22, L972. The coranents arelisted in the same nurnerical sequence with that of ourpast letters and consider only those which were not pre-viously resolved. Man5r of the items which follow wil"l-
read trCornnent remainstr sLnce revised plans were not sub-
mi t ted.
NONSTRUCTTIRAL COMI,IEMS :
1. Cdment rernains. The use of fire retardant wood sleepers 7and the acceptance thereof are f or your decisi ort. . tt i t '-..r1
July 7,
X,
a
OFFICES OF THE
EXECUTIVE OIRECTOR
T. H. CARTER
ANAqING OIRECTOR
JAMES E. BIHR
TECHNICAL DIRECTOF
D. R. WATSON
z.a do. Vl i;7 ,.2. Corrnent satisfied.
3. (a) Conment renains.No revised p1ans.
4. Conrnent remains.No revised plans.
5. Comtrent remains. Note that No. 18 gauge aluninlzed steelconstruction should be justified for equivalence with No.L8 gauge steeL.
6 through 10. Coments remain.
w111 verlfy these c@nents.
Architect states that vou
tft 1 O otz
Qot9
o
13
16.
12.
-2-
Conment renaLns. The system speclfled ln ICBO Research Recm-
nendation No. 1497 ustng a single Layer of Ll2-lnch Firecote rrCrl
sheetrock ls for a one-hour fire-resLstive assembly. Justiflca-
tion for a two-hour assenbly is required.
and L4. Cornnents remain.
Cmrent saEisfied if fireplaces are speclfied to be in cmrpliance
with Research Recosmendacion No. 1802.
18. Contment satlsfied lf the system is specifically ca1led out for
courpliance wlth Research Rec orrlenda t lon No. 1497.
21. (a) through (h) Cments remain.
22. Cment remains. No revised plans.
27. Comment remains. No revised pLans.
?lans and other data are being held pending receipt of further Lnseruc-
tions fron you.
?lease coDtact this offlce if there are any questions.
Yours verY trulYt
INTERNATIOML CONFEREIICE
OF BIIILDIT.{G OFFICIALS
t Jr't
T. J.
(ghrer
Ko5/amatsu
Plan Check Engineer
TJK:hb
(
Hr:"#
June 8,L972
-+llat!.-g\""k No. 8552
ECll-?l.l c ondomln lura and' Corncnerc lal
RBCTIECK
1970 Unlforo Bulldtng CodaEd Struble
Dulldlng Offlclal
City of VatlBq 100
ValI, Colorado 81657
Dcar Mr. Struble:
Revfued data for the above proJect ln the foro of a letter
prepared by the archltect hae been revieved ulch refer€nceto our letter of May 11, 1972. Hany of the lrens whlch fol-
1ow w111 read |tComent renal.ngtr becauae revlaed planr were
noe subuitted at thlc tlure. The cments are lleted ln the
sano nuoerlcal eequence nlth otrr letter of l{ay 11.
9ENERAL cCstr{E}lTs!
'/t, For your declslon. - ,1.4-1,<{.*tz/:.*V^.--
'/ 2. Arlnptlcn rtandr. . ti4,1L
V3 and 4. C6r6entr remafn. ti).,* ..-rt-,- t+) t*,,-.*..
NONSINUCTT'RAL CGSE}TTS :nt-
"r ,J/
^,r{/- t. r(a) CccmenE sarlafted lf, rooflng lg a Claer ',A,'bullt- r
Ca'J up aeaenbly.
- .LL
. -*" .f-,^Il7 -(U) CcEoent rernalnl. Plrc retardant rrcated luubcr 1!
.-I.,-r',',e t noc constdered noncoobugtlblo.
n - t.lr'tr:f, iJ" -2. c@ent renqlns. ,."L ' ..'
$ - "1.J't3. (a) comenr renalnc.' / (b) Cono€nr satloflcd.
VJ "1**l'"-'"^+'4+''z
*.4i-"*'n ct"t- '<tLt +'eL--s-1
.tJ
.r, til*l, t*iiz . a J'+"''-iut*'t
-2-
and 5. Comentt lenslq.
(a)(b) Cc,'z:ents reostq. If theae a"e no! publlc tollett' other. . -
eorap ly lEg tollets Efi:s: be prf'lded to trl{!€ t che requl'r€Gont.
ccr,,lncnt re1a1n3. T!..e tolle: r"ot]:c 103 8nd 109 - not6 that thcse
wotrld r,.ot ba coasider3d xi;Ete :ei,1ets.
Ccrr:teot re$ala!.
cfisrent reoa inr ultll thc Lnfot':catlon sPectlled by ttle archltoct
ln hlc let;.:t ls ctc'-rr on rbc Pl4n!.
Ccnrrenr relralnc trnlesa U.S.A. Stacderd Z 124'2-t9('7 tr approved
by the l,nternatlonEl A.soclatlo of Plrrib{ng and }iachanlcal
OfflctaLs.
utrcn lnfo:ra:lon 1r provldcd on tho plant.
- ! ,t lt-i*:''i "t '.
:
"*tC
/.o /r/
ofi";
fi.lf
*;;'vriJnP"',
d*3:
t*f;'
l*,.(p
^6rro.
./pr
\,J
tr}l
/tt, Cqdneni: saclsfied. The lxchleect ttace$ the $hat{err Or btthtubS
do not tave doora.
.lr,(nr'l-rll2 and 13. Cogmencr reoeln rrntll ltrfolrat,1on {a ahosn on the planl.
Y,fl' lloie that beana rrqulic a nLni.Ersl o! l-lneh e-ovef fot tlto'hotlsIU
6I.'. ),protecilon.
l.rru/ t+, (a) Thls casgnt concoroa portloas o! the colar:na 6bove tha 6u!r'
.ru/:.A pended cetllng level.
/ (b) llec:tlc bov.aa of i5 sqrrrc lnchea {n arca ore pcnnlttcd ln' e"ch 10C oq'.ure fcnf, of; aucienCed cel!'lng arca'
/tS. tror futurc referonca.
, rl9
t(t,' 16. Coumeut recaLne.
' . F;" I
r0!i"'ffZ. Cccr*ni sarlsfled lf the lnforoatlca rpeclflcC by th€ arehltoct ln-," hlc lc{:te! {s p:c*r!.cerl
18. C(rnent .-enalns. Cnc la'rer of \l?-lrrch $?a I dr-woll o botlr
gldeo cf steel 8tu(lr !.s rrot ltrled ln tablc 11e. /:3-B ac a onc'hour
^.-!.{ -t^6
Ccc!'Errt cetlefie,i.
Corrent satltf lcd
-J-i'.: Ii" !' ''
' t \':
't : ' : i
- 1'1r ,4.4L)
r!'
,(.:v'Fl','t
/ rs,
r*/ 20.olit .;t"l
i}';.\t'
21. TG'Cment rcoalu.
C@ent satlrfled shen lnfornatlon ,,r provlded oin theplant.
Revleed plans ere oecersary. to revles th15 {ten. , - ,.
a,4 .e/ri4'L.azAa< -/..<z rL -<.a.c.< .- :..4a.r.a.<,t' et n7,Vz.--' .'-r- f ."^*3.Lf" L z4v'<"
Cment ratllflcd. Intonoatlon ls on cchedula Sheet
A-12.
,*"(*. col
r,$fi.<'| .vr" O,l*i <"1
S{" tu>
f".'\r.
r ,".^r' zf .j;.:*
Ort '/ 24'
/ (") Cmnent tatl.af led.
/(t, Cq@ent satisfled eccordlng to Vall Ordftrancc No. 6.
, rlo
S* Ctl Colnent reoalnt. ';,nL" i..,n,441etLf,/4i- */)Ui**<.1-a*!-.&L+,(4, b,cl'-u'*cl 'a h'.
/"pY (h) 1), 2), 3) aad 4) C@€nrr rematn. ?.L\v-
I 3, Cor'*nent catlrfled.
Corooent. remalnl.
Com€nt ratlrfled wben laforcatlon fu provlded on the ptanc.
tdzz'
25 and 26. Courentr satleflcd.
(a) Archltcct stares rhat dt7 rtsndplpe systemr are
on ghe planr; Clarlf,tcatlon ia requerted.
LJ -l(b) Ccment re"'alos. Any nodlflcatloo to thlg Codoncnt 1r for your conrldcratlon.
v (c) For your lnfonoatlon.
ghorn
r€lulre-
STRUCNMAL CO&TE}fTTI:
Slnce we have recclved
the structural portlonat thl8 tl[s.
rcvfued plaot or co$oente concernlngthla proJect, no connentl w111 bc nadc
lourr very truly,
IITT"RI{ATIONAL COBIRERENCB
OE SUILDING OTFICIAIS
l. J. Koyauatru
Cblef Plan Check Engloccr
oo
of
TJR:bb
International Conference of Building Officials
5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD
June
r WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601
I, 1972
(213) 699-0541
41/
OFFICERS
PRESIDENT
PERRY C. TYREE
REGIOI{AL BU ILOING OFFICIAL
COLOFADO SPRINGS, COI-ORAOO
FIRST VICE-PFESIDENT
EUGENE A. PESTER
SUFERI N'ENOENT. OEPARTMENT
OF EU ILOING ANO SAFETY
POMONA, CALIFORNIA
SECOND VICE.PRESIOENT
NEWELL POCK
CHIEF EU I LDING INSPECTOR
YAXI MA, l/vASHINGTON
TREASUREF
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENDENT OF BIJ ILOING
VERNON. CALIFOSN IA
JUNIOR PASI PRESIOENT
TED E. DUKE
BU ILDING OFFICIAI.
BILLIl{GS, MONTANA
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
T. H. CARTER
5360 5. WORKMAN MILL RD,
WH IITIER. CALI FORN IA
MANAGING DIRECTOR
JAMES E. BI HR
5360 S. lvORNMAN MILL RD.
v/HITTIER, CALIFORN IA
DIRECTORS
GAYLORD C. DOWD
OIRECTOR OF INSPECTIO S
KALAMAZOO, M ICHIGAN
DONALD A. ERICKSON
D IRECTOR
OEPARIMENI OF INSFECTIONS
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOIA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF EU ILOIN6 INliPECTOR
PIERCE COUNTY
TACOMA, u|AgHINGTON
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CI'IEF BU ILOING INSPECTOB
MOUNTAIN VIEl/l'. CALIFORNIA
VICTOR L. TAUGHER
BU ILDING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF ALAMEOA
HAYWARO. CALI FORN IA
JACK O. WHITE
EU II-DING CODE ENGINEEf|
KANSAS CITY, M ISSOURI
VI NCENT R. BUSH
SUPERIN-TENOENT OF BU I LD ING
VERNON. CALIFORN IA
DICK T. JORDAN
OIRECTOR
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
AOSTIN, TEXAS
RAY J. NOKES
BU ILDING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF SANTA BAREARA
SANTA BARBARA, CALI FORNIA
OFFICEA OF THE
EXECUTIVE DIiECTOR
T. H. CARYER
xaN^ort|o ortEctoiJATE3 E. EII'IR
TEC||XIqAL DIRqCTORD. R. WA?3ON
Ed Struble
Building OfflciaL
City of Vail
Box 100
Vai1, Colorado 81.657
Pl"an Check No. 8552
Yai-L 2l Condoniniun and
Comnerc ial
RECHECK
1970 Uniform Building Code
Dear Mr. Struble:
Revised data for the above project Ln the form of a l-etter
prepared by the architect has been reviewed with reference
to our l"etter of May Ll, 1972. Many of the items which fo1-
1ow wilL read rrComroent remainsrr because revised plans were
not submitted at this time. The comrents are listed in the
same nurnerical sequence with our Letter of May 1L.
GENERAL CO}IMENTS:
1. For your dec is ion.
2. Assuoption stands.
,i " '! ' i/,\l3 and 4.' Coments rehain.
NONSTRU TURAL COI"IMENTS :
1. (a) Cdment satisfied if roofing is a Class tAtrbuilt-
up assembly.
(b) C@rent remains. Fire retardant treated Lrrnber is
not considered noncombustible.
2. Coment remains.
3. (a) corment
T-
remains.
satisfied.(b) Cmrent
-2-
4 and 5, Comnents remaln.
6. (a)(f) Corrnents remain. If these are not public toilets, other
conpLying toilets must be provided to meet the requirement.
7. C@ment remalns. The tollet rooms 108 and 109 - note that thesewould not be considered private toilets.
8. Conrnent remains.
9. conrnent remains until. the information speclfled by the architectin his Letter is shown on the plans.
10. Corent remains unless U.S.A. Standard Z L24.2-L967 is approvedby the International Association of plumbing and MechanicaLOfficials.
11. comtrent satisfied. The architect states the showers or bathtubsdo not have doors.
12 and 13. comtrents rema in untiL information is shown on the pLans.
Note that beams require a min imum of l-inch cover for two-hourprotection.
14. (a) This c qrurent concerns portions of the columns ab ove the sus-pended ceiling leve l-.
(b) Electric boxes of L6 square inches in area are permitted ineach 100 square feet of suspended ceiling area.
15. For future reference.
16. Conment remains.
L7. cd'rent satisfied if the information specified by the architect inhis Letter is provided.
18. C qrurent reseins. One layer of 1/2-inch \zpe X drywall oo bothsides of steel studs is not listed ln Table No. 43-B as a one-bourpart it ion.
19. Comnent satisfied.
20. connent satlsfied when informatron is provided on the pLans.
2t. (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cofiment
Cotrment
plans .
Revl sed
Cmnent
A.I2,
-3-
remaina.
satisfled when Lnformatlon is provided on the
pLans are necesaary to revlew this item.
satisfied. Infonnation ls on schedule Sheet
(e) Cment satisfied.
(f) Comrcnt satisfied according to VaiL Ordinance No. 6.
(g) Connrent remqins.
(h) 7), 2), 3) and 4) Cments renaln.
5) Contment satisfied.
22. Comrent reualns,
23. Corrrmerrt satisfied when information Ls provided on the plans.
24, 25 and 26. Cmrenrs satisfied.
27. (a) Archltect states that dry standplpe systems are sholrn
on the p1ans. Clarlflcation Ls requested.
(b) Coment remains. Anv podification to thi_s Code requirg
ment is for your consideration.
(c) For your lnfornation.
STRUGTIIRAL CCDIMEI{TS:
Since we have received no revlsed plans or cotrments concerningthe structural portlon of thls project, no coments wiLl be nadeat thls time.
Yours very truLy,
IMERT ATIOT{AL C ONFEREIICE
tsu
Plan Check Englneer
TJK:bb
L
A,Ll
N(r)
\)
22 fi.rte 1972
liro Ao J. Koyanatau
I.C.B.O .
5360 South Worknan Road
lrhittler, Callfornla 9O6O1
Dear SIr. Koyanrotsu r
IhG follgtidng lc a lnrlponse to yqrr plan re.check #8552 datcd 6 JLnc 19?2
coverlng the "Vsll 21 Cqrdomlntun Btrlldlng" r Rsrponse ts nede ln aecordancc
wlth dcclglqrs ard recqutendaticrs resul tint frcr a cdference botuncn
Hr. Ed Struble, Bulldlng OfflclaL, Vell , Colorado, and me on 21 June 1972r
General Cor,u,ent
l-. ThLs lctter w111 hre considered ln the aa.ne nanner as an addendwr to
thc eontract D ocumenta usuld be conFldered. the 1oca1 br:lfdhg
offlclal w111 fleld verlfy staterxcnts made here for conpllancer
Rerpqlse to I.c,B.Or check:
A vaiiance aUorrlng fLre-retardant trcated wood aleepers Bnd ottrcrnolllng a69sibl,1e9 for "co1d roofr, cqtEtnctXor w111 be applled for
through prop€r Vall channelsr
Note: tjrls cmont relttrsed to i*l ae per lrs.rr telophcnc cqrversatlqrlrlth Ed Stnlbl,a, 2l June Lg72o.
(a) Space bcbfi.n clnrtes and surturrdlng ccrcret. f,loor alab at all.
leveLs rdll bc fully granted hrlth eqlcretc ae per yor:r telophore
cfirvarsqtl'on wXt}| Stnrblor ?l June f972r
A teto hcnrr ratd celllng rdll be lnctaU€d at the ,'3 level" tr&sh
srd ltn€ri .Eoo@gr fh15 celllng ntll, lun diractly to each chute,
Nt'Nd s6al aaf,u! fr1otl spncc abovc.
A tm ltqlr rft d yrl.l ahalL bo birtlt ot each loveL r"rhere traah andllncn chuter occur. lhLs wall thall creat.e a r.ptrate encLoeure for
each cttrto ylthln thol,r rcrpectlve t,ro€ag!'r Only the door to th,o chrtGln cach caso ahall trrcnetrate tlr!.g r*s11+
Noter epeclflcatlonr call for ill6 grr rlwrlnlsed rt,el conttJuctlctfor ctnrteeo Intake doors arc to ba hard opcrated, hopper t!'p.r bocrlngIII trrr ?50o f. V&. B lab€I.
1o
Jr
4f
(
t - te fs"ar .(e',r"'
*'l;{ t\1",'r ,''' rrr
v .r*' '
5,lr ?rr 8.r 9rr l0r !l Stt!$ll tdll ttftlt.
l?1 Eyltrl 6.lld tgs fo gllr nt +*lflc:tfsre co&for"rs to f.C.a.or
, Vq I nnrs mradrttb #l{gtr r$cdng rlnglc lcycr, $.5ro. tri''
, */ *W, lsl'tcl€*,r !$roilr rCo rrr rtr 4rrlry cf$rrnelc ,r t4"crCrv f-ll3rr llr Fd Stnrbh rdll ysrlfyr
I0r ?traplt€rr trrrr. l€ef.or r.D.rt f,l00trCr
l8r oras trcrrr flrc rertrtrer tr nt lry alr C!o.ln!O rd rpclllcrtlcr
cdt.tne for etaOtr llyor UrErOr rf rhrptpc*q {trrcoia *cfl an loftst
r{dcr of 3 5.1.8" mtrl rbdrr Hohr c}f iPtglffcrtlsrr dld not crll
fc* lrd' ttrsrnoflber lound rttmrtlf,r, Silrtt SLrr rhrll bllmtnllGdr f,of fr€rBrS. trailttilr fioryrtdltlon lrL6??r J/1LL *--'----- /
!l. (r' V|'fi|Gr frrl b..l €a|lrt*t lJ| thlr Gr|ilr, nll$ @dltldt| b bf
- gttrflr{r Dd Etnrblt rd,ll urrllyr
(d nGYfrf rfcrcrrf dotrll (rht SBrfl grtrldil for "rxtGlcr ed,tbdstf dl.tlnr Yrrlrrrcc rdlf b. rgpffd for ttrqrltr F${p.r, Vrll churrlr tof X otr Etrgr Faqu!.rad rAcra rpplkablor
(g) Strtr "A* wlll bc rwt5ed to cafsn to "crrlomd ftdrFG$drryltar i lr#cr rd,l,l be Inrtrllrd to tht rsf 'i ftdr 'D"
/L ln cmfsarncc rdth vsll Awrdroont ri6r Ed St*ble tdll rrurllyr' r//
,*,.f , J (h) L $trta "A" trlrtr b. rrrl,tad to csrfom to ''errlorqt ltaltsrttrr- ' ' t't' I Sd.Stnrble ytlt vorllyr
nrQ' y i,. f - [ 2. A v.rleG ytll, br rgpll*l fcl tfuangh ftsopGr 9rl,l ctrurclrer
'n n f ,l' \ urlng "Gi)ttrsr", toctlolr 330S (rl 1 usBrc.
lrf"L a'tV,6 X 3r &rl s?rubla hrtrt yerlry.
l, v', alt" tl
ur*' .l[uNl {e srrvl,&fs* to t.}rp p}rn ri,trl hp eeArr nd stnrbtri d"l,l ylti*yr
,2 nlltr*,{22. $talt .'D" r*ift rarAr* rperdrrl, 6ftal,l lltlfd nrltd open srtD *Gtrtui*
.ilft brlecf ed til|rr t*tlr cmrnt |[Fu,l( nc leqnr rprytyr_, Ed
StnrDL rfff ulfyr- Jltza'.-*' J-hJ .]Z /{/4t"1''' 'ti'(/
v +'dfr/.'-l-u {
2tr E{ 5tnltr dll v*l,fy.
27t ($ (b) bt&.|. dry rtxtplpr .lt|tr| d,f,l b. dG*f9flGd ald ln trlldll Utll.A&tOr Drrlla{r dlf b. riln0ftrrf f* rtrdcwr Ed strtrblc rclllycrlfyr
5lrurillt1
ttfalalor ir dsocrnra*r ,ilrr
(iBr Ed StnrD&.
Ch!|rl.s ftocfiq|r|,rt
"rGlfto
I
ZEILEFI ANrr GIFIAYT lNE.I22 EASI I91H AVENUE
oENVE R. COTORADO 80203
c0ilsul.Tlil0
International Conference of
Building Official s
5360 South Workman Road
Whittier, Cal ifornia 90601
ATTN: Mr. T. J. Koyamatsu
Chief Plan Check Engineer
t-\RE: lVail 2lland L'ions Square IIIr--J
LOnOOm] nl UmS - Va t I , LO tO.
Gentl emen:
In response to your structural
above job, we have enclosed a
c1 arify the questions you have
JCZldb
Encl osurescc: The TAG Assoc.
Mp. Ed Struble
t il 0lll t t Rs
corments contained in the
detailed list of each item
brought up.
PHONE, 303'222 8668
July 2l , 1972
p1 an check on the
in hones to
We apolog'ize for any problem you may have had in coordinating the calcula-
tions with the drawings. However, the plans are correct, and we do feel
the need to "justify" each item not specifically appearing in the calcu-
lations is somewhat unwarranted and an unnecessary additional cost to every-
one involved in the project. It is one thing to question an item which
you have found by your own check to be structurally unsafe, but we feelit is unreasonable to ask us to justify the safety of each structural item
on the job through calculations. This'is especial'ly true of detajls and
connections which we have used repeatedly in the past and know from ex-
perience that the item works. There is neither time, money nor necessity
to make lengthy calculations justifying their use.
I do hope that in the future any calculations that are to be submitted to
you wil'l be made more complete;, however, I also hope that future checks
witl be more concerned with the plans and specifications and not a crit'ique
of the calculations. If you shou'ld have any further questions on any of
the items, please let us know.
Very truly yours,
ZEILER and GRAY, INC.
au,h
cr "lY
4r/4J
/'$.k't!" '
i Dvtt!t:;s-,r- r : .'1
RESPONSE TO ICBO STRUCTUML PLAN CHECK . VAIL 2I
lb.
2.
3.
The contractor has hired an inspector to satisfy the inspection requirements
of Section 305.
The foundation investigation report by Kal Zeff and Associates accompanies
this response.
The combustible roof shingle has been changed by the architect to a C'lass A
aspr,iit-ifingt". The wei!ht of the asphal['shingles are approximately.306
ill;as pei iiuu"" wh.ich c6mpares,with the : pounOs per square foot used in
desi gn.
There is no Nonstructural Comment No. 2 (a) tisted'in your letter of
Nii it,1972; however, there is a Corment No. 2l (a)-relating to exits
reiuirea tn itre lofts. The architect has successfully applied to lhe .
Vait guitaing Department for a variance of this issue. Consequently, there
wjll be no. structural changes required.
Desi gn-vert'ica'l Analysi s
a. The steel joists noted l2H4 on the "6th Level Framin5j P'lan" and the
,,Loft and noot Friming P'lan" (both plans are located-on Sheet 5-6) _
aie iupporl'ing the 6tF and Tttr flooi''lofts respectively and not roof
construction.
b. Floor Live Loads
r) The 12H6,'10H2 and 8H2 steel ioists used in corridor'locations' sitisti 6oth stress and defleition c.iteria for 'live load de-
flectiirn of L/240 for loading of 100 pounds per square foot. The
allowable live load is 233, not 155 PLF.
?) The use of the lease space on the second level has not been' determined by the ownei' yet. Consequent'ly' a 'letter will be
sent to the 6wner, with i copy to Ed Struble, indicat'ing t!..yqg
of the space-must'comply to tiUte No. 23-A of the Uniform Building
Code with the maximum'ailowable live load equal to 75 psf'
4,
5.
c. The calculations indicated the load on the beam was from
spanning 20 feet where, in fact, they-were only spanning
cir'lculai,ions have been-corrected. This reduction in loacalcu'lations have been corrected.s reduction in load allows the
}J16X26 to satisfy the design criteria.
joi sts
14 feet. The
Grade "Utt ,
#855 as
d. The Wl2X58 steel beam was
beam size. l^lhen applying
inc'luding the masonry wa'll
supplied by the beam. (Mo
basically used because it matches an adJ.acent
the ]oadi wh'ich are distributed to the beam'
, the actua'l plastic moment js less than that
= 248 k-ft actual vs. 260 k-ft al'lowable).
Reference calcu]ation Sheet l4 and General Note 4 on Sheet S-l
I ) The specifications call for the concrete block
Type I and equal to ASTM C-90 grade units and
to be
to be
o o ',ii$rcBo j,i$':
Vail 2l Pase - t ';ii1i
(Cont. ) ,,'":il
' ,;oICBo ,..,;
t. ) , ,riil
';rl'
liiil
'I;;i1;r:.'1i
manufactured by the Denver Brick and Pipe Company. The Denver ':lii:
Brick and Pipe'Company did, in fact, get the bubi:ontract for the ,,i:,.,
b'lock and the weight of the block correspond'ing to #855 with cells ,li.:il 'at 48" fil'led with grout is 47 pounds per square foot of wall heightl I
This weight relates directly to the 46 pounds used jn design.
,f,lii
2) The plans call for vertical reinforcing of #4's at 4'-0 on center ', l
and horizontal reinforcing of standard Dur-o-l,lal at 8" with 2-#4's '",':
,anq nOr1Z0nf,al relntOrClng Of Slandar0 Uur-O-Wal aE 6" wlf,n Z-f{'s i li,i'r ':, lin continuous bond beams'located at each floor. This reinforcing ,:'::
prov'ides a total area of stee'l of 0.164 square inch per square foot ,; ;.llr
compared to the code requ'irement of 0.183 square inch per square
I
l,r,,lllPql EU t\, Lrlg g\,Ut f trqU lI ElllellL Ul \.,.l()J )qugl tr lll9ll ysl JYuCrl s , ',l,i.i',:lfoot. Since we have used high strength reinforcement (yield " rri,
strength = 60 ksi), we feel lhe area-of steel provided is equivalent l1i, .to using 40 ksi - #5 bars at 4'-0 on center. This would g'ive a : ;,ri i',r,u uSt g .tu K)t - tt aJ uctr ! dL .t -u ult Ltrr|uEr. rr|r) wvuttr 9tYs Er ,;l :.tota'l of 0.214 square inch per square foot and satisfy minimum area,'..1 ',r
rgquirements. This wou1d, however, give no added strength to the ',
'':rpqurremenfs. Inls V'loulo, nowever, g1ve no aooeq sf,rengrn Eo fne ,',::,'li'
walls and only increase the possibility of confusion on the iob '. '.,r".,,',
by having different grade of reinforcing steel at the site. The ,','t,'''iuJ llOY l1l9 Ull ltlCllL gl-due Ul ttllllUtllllv Jl,EEl qu Llls )rvs. lrrs . .,,1'. 'l
larger bars vlould also increase placing costs and jncrease the .,1; r":'
difficulty in grouting around the bars. Additional reinforcing i;,'l'
around opiningi has b6en specified in the General Notes on tn.;1 5-1.''iii.,1
f. The W12X45 steel beam has been checked with four floors of masonry wall. ],i,. ll
load; however, the full 'live load reduction was not used which compen- " ,",,
sates for the additiona'l wall weight. (Actual Mp = .|87. k-ft vs. ^allow- ij,,'iliuie-mo-: it4 i:iii: The calculaiions riuve-6".n"co".."teo io ritieci: ";liilrthis change. , ,
i ii,l:;-'''S. The design for the concrete beams shown on Sheet S-7'i s'l ocated on ":l,
calcu'lation Sheets 14, 16 and 24. :,,,..''h. The resisting moment for a W10X2'l steel beam is larger than the actual lilii,,,The resisting moment for a W10X2'l steel beam is larger than the actual ,.,ii,lmoment.Theca]culationshavebeenchangedtoreflectthis.
r r, i:t
i. A l,t'10x29 will satisfy the loading condjtjons for the steel beam at the ', rl
ridge line. The W10X33 shown in the calcu'lations was for a preliminary ,li,r,,riage iint. rne m 0-x3g shown in-the calcu'lations was for a prel iminary 'i,;.i'irll,ioiil spin. Thi ca'lculations have been corrected. ',," ''''t''
1r
r':'i:1!ri
., ' :l1t'
Lateral Design ',1 rd
'Ia. The structure was des'igned for a wind zone of 30 pounds per square tool ..;;r i'.',$
as indicated jn the Uniform Building Code. The corresponding wind velocity ,r;i
, r - -- r ----l |t! ^- F'l ---- "i !!
joist span. The ca'l culations have been corrected. ' ',i,r,,r;,,
.i:..
t,..1Lateral Design ' ,, , ,,,
for a pressure of 30 psf is ll0 miles per hour at sea level. At an E1eva:,, iir
tion oi 8000 feet, thb w'ind velocity fbr 30 psf pressure may be increased' ;. j
by l0 per cent to l2l miles per hour. In a check with the Rocky Mountain ,' :'l
Forest and Range Experiment Station, the maximum wind velocity ever re. ' I
corded near Vail was 76 miles per hour. Consequently, we feel the pressure' : i1
used in desion is conservative and there is no iustification for a hiqher;,r,i:.,,l;'used",in design is conservative and there is no justification for a higherr,tir :iil
wind 'loading. ,:,;i,lili,ii
: 1
i li,:ri
,i ,-, "' 't il :li:\l
a o :"''rr:it
'il lrlr .,.{l!'lrICB0 ,,tl';!'{|l'rVail 2l Pase-, ,l,llii#[,
(cont. ) ,;li;;ii,:l{i;
,:,r:irii'lil I
b. Reference ca1cu'lation Sheets 52 - 57
'i'i:lil!]i
.l':1,1, ,i ;l'jiI ) The method of shear transfer is as detai'led in the sections where ,rliili.lii;i
the shear load is transferred from the deck to the ends of the i,,,';il'::,lr t
fng Snea|- lOaq l5 f|"atn5Teff'eq TI'UIll Lfle ueuK LU LIIE tllu) vl r'llt l'ir l'joists which are welded to bearing plates. The load is perpen- ;ii;,'.,,
i',,dicular to the joist and must be transfemed through the ioist , t,;i.r- rL^ ii'chord members. -Calculations have been included which indicate the :'l i rl
chord members are not overstressed. .i',,'ii
i,,,.;''
'1;i,11ir, '
;,l,lilr,:d,i.t,,i
, ii:
2) Wheeling Tensi'lform 50 qill transfer lateral load providing the :l; tr''
correct-weld pattern is used. If you check the specifications, ';,r I
.,^.. ...3't1 -^rJ^- .r.L^ ..,^!.1 -^+.^-- --^^i3i^,{ --+ia€ia.. *ha m:nrr- -':
'ilyou wi'l'l notice the weld pattern specified sat jsf ies the manu- ,i,,,lil'facturer's recommendation, which a.re included with this response. ,'1,,1,i,
',i'lii,ii":
3) The walls on line 5 have been checked for axial compression due ,. i:lr',','ir ,
to overturning forces and vertical loads, and the total compressive::lr',i
JI Itlg Wdll) UII llllt
"
flqvg Utgll tvllEle^Eu lvl alllqr vvrrrPr s""rvlr \'i'E '- i.'",',to overturning forces and vertical loads, and the total compressive:,1i,,
,
stress for the fully grouted wall is 117 psi which satisfies 'l:iil
sdction 24'18 (J)2, irhich yields an allowable stress of 320 psi. : 'r',''t
t! iii
4) All critical shear-wa]ls, 'i.e., short walls in north-south ,,
direction have all cells fully grouted. Maximum'allowable shear ,,'i , iolrecElon nave all cel ls Tul ly grouEeo. rlax llllulll dl luwclulc >lredr' ',, i' .,. ,'
on the ful'l area on any of these walls is 7.5 psi which is well
',1"1below 20 psi allowed. " '!
lf.:,1:,,]l5), It is the jntent of our design to transmjt all lateral loads l ':r:ll, lJ 9llg llll,tllV \,l (,tll r.rgat lvrl 9v 9l lllrlrrrr , .r,ii.'
through continuous vertical shear walls to the foundation. ' 'i,l,'ll:i .ii
''1"1"Section F-3l3 indicates how studs on steel beams are used toJt:LL lLlll f _.)/J lllU IVqLE) flUW Jlu\l) l.,ll Jl,tc t |.'sqlllJ qr s u''r-s ev
transfer the shear force from one level to the next. l'{e, there- :i'l ::
fore, cannot see where there is a major change in shear resisting ';',' '
e'l ements . ' ;;ir ij
a. * The .qpec'ifications indicate that the maximum size aggregate to be used ,l':ii, 0. I llg .:t yEr, | | lt.qU lt,alal tll\r l\,(l|,s r,rt[f 9 9lls rllrr/\
t,i i,n.bdira ueams.and^masonry unit c.ells.shall^be 3/8", which comp'lies with ill
1,.
ir " "'i",jj j
, ,. 6) 0verturning compressive forces have been cons'idered on all walls iii'ii' used as sh6ar wills in conjunction with the applied vertical loads :i, i'-,._ _rr I i! 't rr, ' and al1 of the result'ing pressures satisfy code requirements' The 'll, ' ill
maximum condition occuri it ttre wal]s on line 5 which were dis- ,,.,i;r. llr ,r t^i
and al1 of the result'ing pressures satisfy code re
, i,,;ll;:l,l
cussed in ltem 6. (b)3). '::,i:,.
lllr t
7l The precast co'lumns, or in some cases steel co'lumns, may be used .,''Ito rlsist overturning forces for two reasons: 'l). Besides the i,l,:
bond force between the masonry and structural column, there 319 r,,, . ii;';,
metal anchors from the column-to the masonry as spelled out tn an. ,,;,1,,
specifications. 2). The columns are supporting structural beams ,i i
which are directly attached to the wal1 preventing up'lift. -The ;'
load in the beam tan then be transferred directly to the column.
tle have also changed note on section F-l/2 to read: Provide ; ', I
2" x 6" x 6" keys at 12" on center - full he'ight of wa1 l. .l 'i,
7. Plans lll
Uniform Build'ing Code Standard No. 24-24-70.
o
l) thru 4)
The partlcular sections
where the load must bejoist. An analysls has
are we]l below allowab'le values.
noted in your plan check relate to Item
transferred through the chord member of
been made which indicates the combined
Page - 4
were included in the
for hydrostatic pressure
at the site provides
The calculations for
original submittal.
necessary because the
adequate drainage.
the retaining wall design
There were no provi,sions
porous .material present
The reinforcing required 'in the masonry walls, as stated
is to be continuoui through the floor slab to secure the
slab. Ed Struble will be-notified to specifically fie'ld
forci ng.
The pr€cast concrete fascia panels, shown in
have,been designed to span horizontally the
in the original calculations.
details onfull 24 feet
Sheets 53 and
as indicated
The wal'l reinforcing will be 'lapped
of the steel beam. Ed Struble will
check the dowel reinforcing.
we
to specifical'ly field
Ito the flangeswith dowels
be notified
I ded
See Item 7. (f).
formu'las as showi in section 2702 of the Uniform Building Code. The
The masonryun:l.l,Sat the opening to the lofL at the location. in questionr
are considi:red reinforced'non-bearing walls whjch satisfy the maximum
ratio of unsupported he'ight to thickness ratio, as stated in Table
N0.24-I. Usiirg 18 feet-of unsupported height, we get an L/t ratio
of 27 vs. 36 a]iowed. The steel beams to the east of the openings were ,
itt.it"a-to" corpiiince tor latera'l support with the beam griphs.[rinted
'in the AISC Design Manua], which were'derived wjth identically the.same ,
actual moment js 65.8 kip feet with the unsupported length 9quq1 !9
The allowable load for a'lrll6X26 at this unsupported length 'is 69 kip
CHKO,
lre 6 - 6,@l).
Frrro t\T\rx. LoAo T(zANStAtfTc-o
AilLl €tJo oF JotST
lfiAf . oc-oud-s
otJ (. I I
Ft^to
t"ot | )
Jorrl ePgs fuANsf€E Laao To Vntt
Laeo /Jsr.. t,/O "o.rt7 r/lr =
NA= J,s(o.a-t-+): o'a7q x'"
fr/ooo = a, e ? \"./z :. o, ts lc'
lV1 Prt Epo E€AcTtau Q J!T.
Q: e(o,ora' c.c.,{)/ra)* J.alo
Laae oa Ea. OtAGc,t,/Et, g,ro , ij.j- (l
JarsT: f aH5, /zo,t73
IN LOFT A'
' 7,q
Q - aaz3e) 4)
b. ! 4 (rorac rP t4' wrac
tAufED To €AcH
^LL
3 6,l/t-- 9,osx
Loae Otgft
Et'lO lrJ '{T
. t?
1
I
I
Av€ '
b
Fa
+y
trb
a: c,4b?
- l'9L/o.tlt
+;10,31)':3!.-1ft,):t' =
3 6it, :, ?' )
.4 t4 4t6 A
rJ.?So + o. 78 :':-l
lrern - r.(b) '3). h'lauu oN Lrr'r€ g
Oveetunut*tG fllan. t ft,7n''
rMA L.L LeeTU :- 1LO
e FFecrrv€. N€T wta rH tF waLL = 1tb-1{ A€r'ats*
t.o3 0.K
AL.L CEL+,'
5. fn: 1,62s (S+rr/6
{s = 1t' 7(DYfi6 7
= F2L1 L3.
=. tbe Ptr
C o.fiP,
tt1 ?ra < l1f ?t1
;rdset ' ?/A r P' a7'02) ' Ai
$3 + on= Ean 22ffi'.."1"1.rr'
+e..4..:,tP-:)-L
'-.i,i'l '"i .'
-l r-- lrern 1(h).
Aeen
I
sxeer no......3..,.....
rca xo...2.1,f4.:.1-
.. .{4.!.h.....?.!.....
,o !9nC,CHEcr( , Cotuuicrtaat oF . tr66L 6mp
Aceoa?lN| . ta 5ta4e' - Fretc.fttat feeo'ey
I
l
CoNTE t6oT/ NG
:
To Q*nt.: 14(a\t
?= o,ot (a*r\, ta.rfu
6t, J
i
=a.f3*-
M(6) ra( E):
,F 7'7,r1
Q eecnou t o,t.ts[.?0a\(o,l 5z) t + &i ( o'r/a)tru )/u,
Qr t9. rK
RFrps, i
An, , ,Vu" 0\?
t3.r(t,rt)"
o,&r.
4 P'r s'
t14
at. )W;
ReruF. i
L L To lo, t'tt
. /3,5
6,729
c(o, a) :l. ? ,-L
(o.t€L\(1.12i,364
e, N /
t.a(o. er)(t,\( t.e), i?k
i ;;i
il Matdliah Testing gervice
MATERIALS REPORT {or
Job No. or L D. 520-1
Dorc Tcsred: 7lL4l72
Mix l.D.: 5t saclSlu'p'
Wotcr Tamp.:
Toto I Yords :
Wotcr Raducer:
Win d:
Tima Botchcd:
TESr CYLTNDERS 52O
3 DoY
l.
2.
4.
Averogc
REMARKS:
lYPe
MountaLn Constructor I e
Air Tcmp.:
Toto I Wotcr:
Air Entro in in g:
Humidiry:
Timc P loccd:
(13-18)
7 DoY
285)
3OO8
293r
II Cemnt
'P.O. Box l2l3
Boulder, Colo. 80302 825-5261
2531 West 8th Ave.
VallLocolion:2Li
Denver, Colo. 80204
Tickct tr
Lcvel 2 floor
A ir:4tt Wt/Cv.Ft.: Y ie ld:
Concreie Temp. :
F A Moisfurc:
Co lc ium:
Weothcr:
. Time Tcsted:
14 Doy 28 Doy
eEcE?e\
d JUt a4 E7z
Q,"r{q
|VIOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTORS, lNC.
P. O. BOX 1788 ' PHONE 476332',t ' VAIL, COLORADO 81657
EF0moQe4w{xtpErFDiuotExF5)soaxram()uo([E{6t$9(p00(}0{)4(w
JuLy 20, L972
To!./n of Vai I
Munic ipal nui lding
vail, Colorado 81657
Attention: Mr. Ed Struble
Gentlemen:
On July L9, L972, T, as representative and empJ-oyee of Mountain Constructors,
Inc. did perform a general inspection of the structure known as Vail '21r
in the company of Dick Snodgrass, Superintendent of saiil corporation.
The following descrepancies were found in the existing structure (constnrction
now proceeding on the third level of said structure. )
In general. weld.ing of stnrctural membe rs (steel to steel,
steel to concrete, and concrete to concrete, are inadequate
and not performed per drawing and specification.
Failure to grout under precast c olumns prior to erection of
structural- membe r of third level.
3. Fai.lure to natch bolt hole at beam and column connection
(Column line F bethreen Column line 4 and 5. )
Failure of adequate penetration of plug welds, "Tensilform"to joists, prior to pouring of concrete decks.
t.
2.
4.
SIJMMARY :
Sincere 1y ,
Failure to clear work area of ileleterious material prior to
pouring decks.
It is intended that the above mentioned deficiencies will be
corrected prior to subjectj-ng the nain lower supporting
membe r to additional loading. A closer inspection of all
structural work per plan and specification will be initiated
inmediatd ly.
MOI'NTAIN CONSTRUCTORS,
L. Sheley,
DT-S / rr
cc: File
::"%4t! , to
d. 'ei a;a1
Yp. !y
INC.
//2,'5.
Jurisdiction of
PLUMBING PERA,IIT APPLICATION
numbered spaces only.
cK. M.O.
(LlsEE ATTACHaO gHCEr)
ZIP PHOI.IE
FHO|{ a ttcENsE xo.
rtEct oi DE9tcNEi I rcEN3E rO,
E|{GIiTEER ! | cENSE li O.
USE OF 6UILOIN6
8 CIASS Of WOrK: tr NEW C] ADDITIOT{ tr ALTERATION tr REPAIR
Typr ot Faxtura oa lttn
WATER CLOSET (TOILET'SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
LAVATORY (WASH BASIN}
KITCHEN SINK & OISP.
APPLTCATION ACCEPTEO €Y:
WATER HEATER
UR I NALNOTICE
THIS PERMTT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN B) DAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENOED OR ABANDONEO FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCE D.
ORINKING FOUNTAIN
FLOOR--SINK OR ORAIN
GAS SYSTEMS: NO. OUTLETS
WATER PIPING & TREATING EQUIP.
WASTE INTERC€PTOR
LAWN SPRINKLER SYST€M
SEPTIC TANK & PIT
WHEN PFOPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
cAsH PE RM lT VALIDATIONPLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE _ INSPECTOR CANARY - AUOIT PIN K - APPLICANT GOLDENROD - TEMP. F ILE
International Conference of Building Officials
5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD . WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601
, May Lt' L972
(t''
J ,i't
!.
\
Ed Struble
Building Official
City of Vail
Box 100
Vail, CoLorado 81657
Dear Mr. S Erub 1e:
Data for the above projecE has
with the Uniform Building Code
lows:
GENEML COMMENTS:
Assumption has been made that the uses and materials in
the lease areas wilL be compatible with an F-2 Occupangy.
This should be conf irmed to your satisfaction. 1if,-"t-''< | 4r::,{
/ ( . c'- t-
Occupant Load: 302
Valuation: $968,000.00 (Suggested)
1970 Uniform Building Code
Seismic Zone No. I
been reviewed for conformance
and our comtrents are as fol-
OFPICES OF THE
EXECUTTVE qtSECTOi
T. H. CA,RTER
MANAGING OIFECTOF
JAMES E. EIHR
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
D. R. WATSON
and F-2
Cormnent 4)
Ft.
,t'i r,'
(213) 699-Os41
Plan Check No. 8552
Project: Vail 21
Condominiurn and Corrnercial
Type of Construction: IT
Occupancy Classif ication: H
Fire Zone No. 3
Stories: Seven (See General
Total Floor Area: 44,000 Sq.
OFFICERS
PRESIDENT
PERRY C. TYREE
REGIONAL BU ILDI NG OFFICIAL
COLORADO SPRINGS. COI-ORAOO
FIRSI VICE-PRESIDENT
EUGENE B. PESTER
SUPERINTENDENT, OEPARTMENT
OF BUILDING AND 5AFETY
POMONA. CALIFORNIA
SECOND VICE.PRESIDENT
NEWELL POCK
CHIEF BU
'LDING
INSPECTOR
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
TREASURER
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENDENT OF BU ILOING
VERNON. CALIFORN IA
J UN IOR PAST PRESIDENT
TED E. DU KE
BU ILD ING OFFlCIAL
BILLINGS, MONTANA
EXECUIIVE D IRECTOR
T. H. CARTER
5360 5. WORKMAN MILL RD.
WH ITTIER. CALIFORN IA
MANAGING DIRECTOR
JAMES E. BIHR
5360 S. WORXMAN MILL RO.
WHI'TIEF, CALIFORNIA
OIRECTORS
GAYLORD C. DOWO
D IRECTOR OF INSFECTIONS
KALAMAZOO. M ICHIGAN
DONALD A, ERICKSON
DIRECTOR
OEPARfMENI OF I NSPECTIONS
M INNEAPOLIS. M INNESOTA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF SUILDING INSPECTOF
FIERCE COUNTY
TACOMA, WASHINGION
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CH IEF BUII-OING INSPECTOR
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA
VICTOR L. TAUGHER
EU II-DING OFFICIAL
COUNTY OF ALAMEOA
HAYWARD, CALI FORN IA
JACK D. WHITE
BU I LD ING CODE ENG INEER
XANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENOENT OF BUILOING
VERNON, CALI FOFIN IA
DICK T. JOROAN
DIRECTOR
BUILD!NG DEPARTMENT
AUSTIN, TEXAS
RAY J. NOKES
BUILOING OFFICIAI-
COUNTY OF SANTA EARBARA
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFOFNIA
ll'
{:,
1.
t ,t, ,,,
),
2. In the absence of uses specified on f loor pLans for lease t ..-../r.,,areas, the occupant load has been based on one per 100 -Lr'r r' /r// 4
square feet for these areas. The validity of this should
be confirmed to vour satisfaction.
3. Cl-arif ication regarding propercy lines is required on the
site plans before exterior wal-1 and opening requirements
may be reviewed. Note, for example, that sEairs G, H, K
and L appear co extend to property lines. Public ways
should be clearlv indicated on the site plan.
4, In accordance with your Ordinance No. 6, this buiLding is
considered seven sEories. Note Ehat the loft area does
not ccnply as a mezzanine per Section 414 artd is considered
a storv.
2.
3.
4.
5,
-2-
NONSTRUCTI]ML CO},II"TEMS :
1. Type II buildings should be of noncombustible construction.
(a) CombustibLe material such as shown in Detail 2/A-LO
and the details on Sheet A-9 do not conply.
(b) Duckboard floor shosm on Sheet A-LL does not comply --':,
Roof coverings should be fire retardant. Sectlon 1704. De-
tails or specifications complying vith Section 3203 (e) are
required. Notq, that specifications call for wood shingle. .rr. ,-t rroof. f "h -rt,.; ('t(,
Enclosures for floor openings should courp ly rrrith Table
No. 17-A and Section 1706.
(a) Details shown in UA-4 does not comply.
(b) Opening Lo eLevator shaft shoul-d be protected lrith one-
and- one-ha l-f-hour labeled assemblies.
Rooms in which rubbish chutes terminate should be separated
frqn the remainder of the building with a one-hour occupancy
separation. Section 1706 (c). Note special" treatment of
chute for shaft protection as it enters the rubbish room.
Openings into rubbish and linen chutes should not be located
in required exit corridors or stairways. Section L706 (c).
In accordance with the 1971 suppl-ement to the Uniforrn Building
Code, provisions should be made at the lease area 1evels of
t\,ie building for the physically handicapped.n
, il
,,''(a) Public toilets should be provided with conpartments not
Less than 3 feet by 5 feet and equipped with grab bars
on each side. Compartment doors should open outwardly.
Section 17L1 (a).
(b) BuiLding access for the handicapped shoul-d be provided.
Section 3301 (l-).
7. Nonabsorbent finish and backing for toilet room floors, vaL1s
of toilet cornpartments, and wa1ls around urinal-s should con-
forrn with Section 771"7 (a). Reference toilet rooms on level 1.
Concrete block does not conply.
8.
9.
-3-
Openings in exterior walls within 20 feet of property
lines should be protected with three-fourths-hour fire
assemblies. Section L903 (b).
Fire-resistive constructLon for structural el-ements in
the exterior wa1ls should conply rdith Footnote No. 1 of
TabLe No. 17-A and Section 1903. See Section L7O2 for
clarification. Beam Detail 10/A-L2 should be justified
for a minimum of two-hour fire-resistive construction.
10. Fiberglass tub enclosures should comply with a specific
ICBO research reconmendation or be otherwise justified.
11. Doors and panels of shower and bathtub encLosure should
comply with Section 1711 (c to e).
Floor-ceiling assemblies for Type II buildings are required
to be of two-hour fire-resistive assemblies. Unless the
system shown is in accordance with a specific item in
Table No. 43-C it shoul-d comply with a specific ICBO re-
search recomrendatinn or be otherwlse justified.
The struclural- frame of Type 1I butLdings should have two-
hour fire-resistive construction. The thicknesses of
Monokote indicated in the specifications should be speci-
fied to comply with ICBO Research Recmrnendatlon No. L578
for the two-hour protection of the various structuraL ele-
ments. Indicating the flre rating only wouLd not be con-
sidered suff icient informatLon.
74. Enve 1" ope ceilings should satisfy the foLlowing condl-tions.
Sectlon 4303 (b)-6.
L2.
13.
l"*tt'
(a) Columns should be individually
exampLe, see G/3-3.
(b) El-ectrical outl-et boxes should
greater than 16 square inches
fire protected. For
be of steel and not
in area.
15. Final- partition layouts and details ln lease spaces should
be submitted prlor to installation to justify compliance
with occupancy, f ire- res is tl.ve, structural, and exit require-
ments.
16.
L7.
18.
-4-
Justifying test data in conformance rtith Section 106 or
an ICB0 research recormendation is required for the Pre-
fabricated fireplaces.
Light and ventilation for lease spaces should comply with
Section 1105.
A one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation is required
between a boiler room or central heating plant and the rest
of the buiLding. Section 1L08. Duct work piercing waL1-s
should be fire damoered.
19. The openabl-e portion of window W-L is questioned. Note
that it should be a minimum ot L|ZO of the room floor area.
Section 1305 (a).
20.Mechanical ventilating system in baths of condomlniun units
should provide five air changes per hour direcEly Eo the
outside. Section 1305 (a). Fan capacity should be specified.
Exlts.
(a) Two conforming exits are required from the lofts-a! 6 JLeve1 plan and 7 1evel plan, Sheet A-6, Sectlon 3302.
Unless revlsed to conply as rnezzanines defined in Sec-
Eiofl 4L4 they are considered stories. ?1ans as shown
provide no cornplying exits fronr these levels.
(b) Exit doors shoul-d be openable from the inside vithout the
use of a key, special knowledge, or effort. Section
3303 (c), Note also that surface mounted flush or sur-
face boLts are prohibtted. Autonatic flush bolts are
allolred on pairs of doors provided the door with the
flush bolt has no knobs or surface mounted hardware and
the unlatching of any Leaf requires only a single opera-
tion.
(c) Interior openings into corridors should be protected as
set forth in Section 3304 (h). thenty-minute rating for
door assemblies requires cmpliance rdith a specific re-
search recormrendation or a labeled fire assembl-y. The
latter would result in a 45-minute rating since it is
the minimurn presently label-ed. Note that concrete span-
dreLs shown on riTest and north elevations create interior
2L.
.it l
(pr-' *.lt ''
, cd-'
-Y,.-"r;t"t'
-r-
corridor conditions for what are intended as exit
balconies. Note that openings other than doors are
limlted to 25 percent and this condition should be
corrected at:
L) North east and west wal1s of lease space 106.
2) South wa11 (Line Dr) of lease spaces 101 and 102.
3) South wall (Line D) of Lease space l-10.
4) vJest r,ta11 (Line 4) of lease spaces 204 and 205.
5) East wa1l (f,tne 3) of Lease spaces tOZ and 202.
(d) Landings on stainrays should have a dimension in the
direction of travel equal to the width of the stairway
but need not exceed 4 feet. Section 3305 (f). Plans
should clarify.
(e) Basement portion of staintays shq.rld have an approved
barrier where continuous to upper floors in an exit
enclosure. Section 3305 (g).
GuardralLs for stairs, balconies, and landings should
conform with Sectiot L7 14. Note that max imurn cLearance
between intermediate rails is 9 inches and.rai1 height
should be 42 inches. '41i ,, !.1 ' f. , |, 4 .
(g) A11 required interior stairhtays which extend to the top
floor in any building four or more stories in height
shal1 have provided at the highest point of the stair
shaft an approved hatch openabLe to the exterior not
less than 16 square feet in area-witl1 4 min inuru dimension
of 2 feet. Section 3305 (1) . /^/.,k, ( , K.
(h) Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 3308.
Reference stairways rtAtr and riBrr. Two-hour fire-
resistive wa11s are required. This includes the side
where stairs open to the exit balcony.
Enclosure protection should be provided for stairwaytBt' from where it interconnects to other stairways
at Level 4.
(f)
1)
2)
22.
-6-
3) Doors should be labeled one-and- one-half-hour
fLre assemblies with additional requirement of
maximum 450%., temperature rl"se above ambient
after 30 minutes of fire test.
4\ Exit enclosures should incLude a corridor on the
ground floor extending to the exterior. Fire-
res Is tive c ons truc ti on and opening protec tion
should be as requlred for the exlt encLosure.
Only exit doors are pernitted to open into the
corridor. Extension of enclosure is necessary.
5) An approved barrier is required at the ground
floor to prevent people frorn accidently continu-
ing to the l-over level.
Stair tDtr sbould be a snokeproof enclosure complying with
Section 3309 as amended in Vail 0rdl.nance No. 6. A conply-
ing vestlbule shoul-d be provided at each level-. This scair
should aLso be accessible to the loft level shown on Sbeet
46.
Exit signs should be provided in c onformance with Sectlon
3312 (b)(c).
Every sleeping rocrn below the fourth floor should have one
openable wlndow or exterior door conforming to Sectlon 1304
for emergency exit or rescue.
Venting is required for elevator shafts extending more than
two stories. Section 1706 (d). The larger ot 3-Il2 percent
of the shaft area or 3 square feet per elevator should be
provided .
23,
24.
25.
26. Roof drainage sh ou1-d be conducted under the public sidewalk.
Section 32A7 G).
27. Fire Extinguishing System.
(a) Dry sEandpipes are required in buildings four or more
stories in height.
(b) Wet standpipes are required as specified in Section 3804.
(c) Fire-extinguishing system plans should be submitted to
you to deternine compl-lance with applicable building,
plumbing and fire codes.
-7-
Structural comlents wiLL be forwarded to you as soon as they are
cmpLeted.
May we suggest a vaLuation of $9681000 since there
cified. Please inform us of your declsion so that
can be lssued to cover our services.
In c onf ormance with existing poLlcies, we will not
letter with anyone other than from your department
sion is speciflcaLly granted by you.
was none spe-
an invoice
discuss this
unless permis-
Please feel free to contact us if there are any questtons.
Yours very truly,
IMERNATIONAL CONFEREINCE
OF BUILDING OFFICIALS
Tfi:hb
Koyanatsu
Plan Check Engineer
"li i;" ":'""-^.o . (q.sesa=D
THE TAG ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
82O sixteenth stneet suite 31O
denven, colonado 8O2O2
(3O3) 534-6905
5 September 1972
re: Vai-l 21 Condominiums
Diane Weygandt
Building Departnent
Town of Vail
Vail , Colorado 81657
Dear Diane:
C.sr1 oe cr.C. Cajagl
5ea.'..l or tt67;:q-J6s .
t r, Lr- Ma,u 13 fr+.,
4r"p Lreg
H&. C" r.orsA aJ
D€YT.
I or,J*
We are submitting the following specification for fire-retardant
treabnent for the wood sunscreens and balconv fascias as cal-Ied for
by Ed Strubleo
1. apply one (1) coat ollmpic seni-transparent stai-n to all \
exposed wood surfaces. I n^r-2. apply one (1) coat of 'tFlame-Crete" (clear, flat) at the rate |,, "'-=
of 175 5.p./9a1. over stained surfaces. ) , r3. apply one (1) coat !'F1ame-Cretett overcoat (clear, flat) at the /-ttt rfi.-
rate of 600 s.F./gal. over stained r and I'r1ame{retet' treated Isurfaces. ' )
ItFlarne-Crete i-s manufactured by the I'Flame-Crete Co." , Niagara Fal1 ; ,
N.Y., and has a Canadd-U oL. Iistfug #3381{. "FLame-Crete" is an
j-ntumescent coating (wontt flame, and does not produce smoke), and
the I'Flane-Crete'r overcoat is an iner{enanel (does not promote
comtnrstion). The product is handled by the distributor of rta15i-painUr
( approved by Ed S truble for use on I'The Antlerst'). This product
has also been approved by the City of Denver for use on exterj"or
wood waII facings in the dobmtown area.
Dj.ane, we will hold issuing ttris specification to the Contractor for
a reasonable time pending comment from tJle Building Dept. in Vail.
we appreciate your assistance jr this matter.
Thank you.
TGlMg
coc o Chdsr Rosenquist
Bob Wi-lson
eodor A. Grossman Jr.
REct>
d=tz br?
9r vxV
crtof|offraoleA]l StAtlcoqolADo
Ofilo of nilfrtOftLl
REQUEST FOR INSPECTION&W,a 7' aa W
llllllla
EGAV Trfl
-E!G||rrnE
--EnAxrlI ----o
irrrtl|N
nrE
---Jlurx ----€snrnt
---E
f,run
rdE| .----€€ fllrr|. --..*-.8
tElYEtt
--tr
3rl ------o
turglqn .. trErr-..-.€tB. --_Jlirl. -----Jlcdntrrc --.El llowr
---E
Iqr|| U
fl'|ts|| I
'UIUTESrqfn.
-y't-4,.--41e,U
Orldr
- nrtt - ce$oo'
-{l . F
-rllor tt2aQrrox -- - -A*f,,-AIr. rra t- (tu' ) D {;/-fuc\--l^.r. /4//41J.11<
tlaDacdoo /
P-O. Box l2l3
Bouldcr, Cob. 80392 825 -5261 2531 West 8th Ave.
MATERIALS tEPOnT for HrLn
Job l{o. oc t. O. ,4.1
Dotc Tcrtcd: W t, :l9rZ
Mix l.D.: 5f ttn II
Wotrr Tcnp.:
Toto I Yordrr
lVotcr Rcduccr:
Wind:
Tirno Bcrchod:
TEST CYUXDERS
Sli.rmp:
Locotion: YdL 2f
.
Ylr/Cv.Ft.:
Denver, Co|o.80204
Ticlrr r
Y ic ld:
Dov
zrt$
z1t5
ML
Corltnstirr
w
Air:
Air Tonp.:
Totol Worcr:
Air Eniroining:
Hurnidity:
Tino Plocrd'l
lJ
3O7 Dov
N7
?973
2325
zffi
todstlo lal].l.
Concrclc Tcmp.:
F A I'loisturc:
Co lcium:
lVcothcr:
Timc Tcstcd:
14 Doy
l.
2.
3.
1-
Avrrogr
REIIARXS:
3 Doy
Fnnl tl
di6 ;s,,',r
.i?'€.".9
t-O Box l2l3
Boulder, Colo. 80302
ilATERIALS REPOiI for
Job No or t. O. 53&nl
Dotc Trrrrd: Js 29r L/12
Mix r.D.: 5jl rlyp. Xt
lYotrr Tcmp.:
Tolql Yardr:
Wotor Raduccr:
Uind:
Tinr Borched:
Slump: lr A ir:
Air Tomp.:
Totol Wotcr:
Air Entro ining:
Humid ity:
l
Tirnc Ploccd:
7-t2
3Q7 Doy
1911t
Ln6
Ly36
J$n
(Loor & E$rt statl
llrutrla Ccdnston
825-5261
Locotion: VS!.l a
Ylt/Cu.Ft.:
Concrctc Tcmp.:
F A Moisturc:
Co lc ium:
lYco thrr:
Timo Tcctcd:
14 Doy
'!
Denver, Colo. 80204
Tlctrt I
Yicld:
,aa Day
36c6
3545
)bL6
3522
2531 West 8th Ave.
TEST CYLINDEPS !&
3 DoY
l.
2.
3.
4.
Avcrogc
REIIARKS: lcLL6 lpa rall.
,!s7z
. . ..*-*..T1*
253r West 8th
Boulder, Colo. 803O2 825 -5261
Mounteln Conatnrctor I sMATERIALS REPORT lor
Job t{o or l. D. 520-1
Dotr Tcstcd: 7lL$l72
Mix l.D.: 5t rcclStmp'
llotcr Tcmp.:
Toro I Yordr:
lVotcr Rrdueor:
lYind:
Timc Eotcfird:
rEsr CYL|NDERS 52O
3 DoY
l.
2.
3.
1.
Avaogr
REIIARKS:lyp. II
Locotion: Va[1 21
Ylr/Cu.Ft.:
Concrclc Temp.:
F A Mois turc:
Colcium:
Wcothcr:
Timc Testcd:
14 Doy
)Ut+8
3567
3508
Denver, Colo. 8A204
Ticlor n
I3lrlcl 2 f1oOt
Yicld:
28 Doy
b237
40I0
,+f'2?
4t' Air:
Air Tcmp.:
Totol Wotcr:
Air Entroining:
Humidity:
Timc Ploccd:
(13-18)
7 Dov
2853
3008
293t
Ccmnt
ftilatellals Testing S0rvice
t2l3
Boulder, Colo. 80302 825 -5261
MATERIAL3 REPoRT for lbuntal'n Congtnrctort g
Job l{o. or t. O. 520-1 Ticlor I
DotaTcstcd: 7lL7 l,TZ Locorion; Vall 2l--baeemnt floOr
Mix l.D.g| gggl3 Slump: 4tr Air: lVt,/Cu.Fr.: Yicld:
lYotcr Tcmp.:
Toto I Yords:
lVolcr Rcduccr:
Wind:
Timc Botchcd:
TEST CYLTXDERS 52O
3 Doy
l.
2.
3.
4.
Avcrogc
REIIARKS:
Iyp. II
Air Tcmp. :
Totol Woler:
Air Entro ining:
Humidity:
Timc P loccd:
(Le-24)
7 DoY
450
2*r
z)95
Ccmnt
Concrcle Tcmp.:
F A Mois turc:
Cclcium:
Wcother:
Timc Tcstcd:
l4 Doy
3?r3
2954 '!
w3
'iir
2531 Wesf 8th Ave.
Denver, Colo. 80204
E Doy
)590
36t+9
36].9
*:t
f
BEAFTDSLEY. DAVIS ASSOCIATES. INC.
May 19, 1972
Mr. Ed Struble
Building Inspector
Town of Vail
Post Office Box .|00
Vail, Colorado 8'|657
Re: Vai'l 2'l, Rosenquist Project at Vail/LionsHead
Dear Mr. Struble:
This 'letter is in response to your request at our neet'i ng on Monday,
Map 15th, to c'larify the intent of the Vai'l/LionsHead Master P'lan with
respect to the subject s'ite.
In October of 1970, we prepared for Vail Associates a preliminary site
analysis for the First Filing, Lot 3, commonly referred to as Sites A, B
and C. The purpose of this design guideline was to identify for prospec-
tive developers the design criteria and master plan intentions. Thjs
information is often a part of the contractual agreement between the
developer and Vail Associates. Because Mr. Grossman, the architect for
Mr. Rosenquist, has generally followed these gu'idelines, contributing to
some extent to the present setback dilemma, the follovling information may
be of help to you in reaching an equitable decision jn interpr"etation of
setback requi rements.
The attached site analysis discussed above, indicates a recormended setbackfor Site B on the east of 15', the south of l0', the west l0', and none to
the north.
Our rationale with respect to the south was that a 10' s{back would be
adequate for Tract C as it provides a substantial amount of open space
and will be utilized only by pedestrians and emergency vehicles. The west
setback of l0'was suggested for similar reasons for Parcel I is also
dedicated as open space and Parcel 2 was intended for service and entrance
use.
Because the adjacent structures wer€ on the sarn site as the parking structure
which services all three sites, we believed the northerly setback require-
ment would be adjusted with the understanding the necessary fire separation
I23O ACOMA STREET DENVER. COLORADO 80204 303 892.5566
,
Mr. Ed Struble
Town of Vai l
May 19, 1972
Page Two
requivements be met based on Fire Zone 3 as defined in the Uniform
Bui'lding Code. This consideration, I believe, was further reviewed with
the Town of Vail by Hawes and Associates in preparing their feasib'i'l'ity
report on the parking structure in November of .|970.
Although I clearly recognize the site analysis recommendations do not
take precedence over the Tovn of Vail Zoning Ordinance, they do respectI believe, the master plan intentions for LionsHead and will perhaps
c1 arify the rat'ionale behind our sideyard recommendations.
If we can be of further help in the fjnal resolution of this problem, by
provi di n addi ti 1 information, p'lease let rB know.
y you
En cl os ure
w/o encl .
Mr. Char'les Rosenquist
Mr. Theodore A. Grossman, Jr.
Mr. Robert Nott
Z -./-7 >
APPL ICAT iON TO APPEAR BEFORE TH;
BOARD OF ZON ING, APPEALS AND EXAN4 INERS
Date Aoplication Fiied May 15, 1972
t Chuck Rosencrrristtt - -:-:- '--- -1 -':'an+in^ Vail2l' .'':
-
, respectf ully req uest a variance
f rom ihe requiremenfs of Secf ion l- Ord. I ( !97Q) of f he Vail
Zoning 0rC i nance in order to use l0r setback onwest s ide of
proposed building in lieu of l5r as required.
and/or Sect ion of the Un i form Bu i I d ing Code as
amended and adop;ed by the Town of Vail in order to
In rnaking a determination
hrrdchin. naai.l (r.,v, vr,,,r, ,Jr Tne Pro
p roposed variance w ith the
ment of the area andi heal
tants of the Town.
ln h"i lniaa rai,a,-,,.r ---- varlances
of a lte rnate materials and
on zoning, the Boa rd cons i de rs only unCue
posed variancel compatibility of the
surround ing areai e f fect on future. deve lop-
th, safety, and the we I fare of the inhab i-
, the Board may cons ider on ly su iiab i I lty
methods o.f construct ion and; reasonab ie
interpretafions of the provisions of fhe code!
The administrative of f ici'al may challenge any variance g ranted which
goes beyor,d the scope of the powers of the Board.
It is understood that a fee of $25.00 payable in advance and that a
fen ( l0) day posting period is required prior to a public hearing on
the above req uests .
L. z,o,
VA
S igned:
Va,ut ,7 . /r , ut
May 16, 1972
Mr. Robrrt T. LtzlorVall, Colorado
SubJect: Vcr I cncc
Dear Bob:
Thls ls to Inform
been scheduled for
Off I ce.
lcatlon - Vall 2lApp I
you that a rpcelcl varlenceFrlday, May 26 at 9:00 a.m.
meei I ng has
in the T,own
oppl led for
red l5 r on
!4r. Chuck Rocenqulst on behalf of Vall 2l h6sa trtback verlancc of l0r In llcq of the rcqul
thc _rcgt rl de of the ner bul ldlng.
lf you nl:h to protcsf this vartanco, plcase be prescnt atthe mceilng or: fl lo your protest by ccrtlfled nial I bcfore
Dl ana l{yge ntfor RobErt Clark, Chalrman
dr
CERTIFIED I,IAIL
Mty 25.
Yourg truly,
BoARD OF ZoNtNc, APPEALS ANo EXAMTNERS
of the Board
o
rI,n
4rl
ra
J
,
o
cr
I
ct
h
0
m
2
$
D
6
R
I
6
Ro
OG
J
I
3
co
ra
ln
ch
tb
ho
0tt
mc
25
$
D
6
Ro
IF
!,1r.P.'0
Yol I
SubJ
Dec r
Thls
bcen
0f f I
I nfa
msct
Mr. .a lrcoft
lf v
the
May
Your
BOAR
0l anfor .
dr
CERT
in Cu
Box
'Colo
I
6
6
t:
lm:
r nce Appllcatlon - Vall 3l
rm you fhai o spcclal varl€neo mortlng hrs
for Frlday, May 26 at 9:00 a.m. In tho Torn
d appreclat-o lt lf you rould notlfy othor
lcs In the Vantagc Polnt ProJect of thls
qu lrt on beh'c I f bf Va I I 21 hos app I lod f or
nce of l0r f n lleu of l5! on'tho rcat.cldc
protca+ ihlg varlance, pleaso be prcsent et
fI le your prot.st by certl fled nal I beforc
, APPEALS AND EXAMINERS
k, Chalrman of the Board
st
chs
st6
9.
uck
acl(
.bu
wl
rtl
c
0
d'o
3
o
d
I
n
sh t
o
r
I
I
I
I
tru I
0Fz
ilygo
bert
IED
moct I ng.
Mr. . Ch uck .Rorcnq u I rta gctback'varlanqe ofof tht bulldlngr
on beholf bf Uall0f In lleu of
o
| 2l has app I lrd for
l!! on':thc rcst sldc
-
\t
' Mr. Jfhr Cunnlngham
, P.'0. Box ll6
Ya I t, Colorado
SubJectr' Varl once App I I catlon - Vel | 2 |
Oear J I m:
Thlg ls to Inlorm you fhaf a spcclol vlrlanco mcctlng har
bccn schgdulcd for Frlday, May 26 af 9:00 c.m. In fho"Torn
0f f lcs. l, rould cpproclat-. lt I f you worlld notl f y ofhcr
Intercctod' parflcs In the Vantagc Polnt ProJcct of fhls
lf you'vlgh to protqgt thlg varlance, pleaee be prtrent at.fhe mcrtlng or flle your protest by certlfled mall bsforc
May 25.
YourE tru ly,
BOARD OF ZOI{ ING, APPEALS AND EXAM I NERS
0lana llygonf
for.Robert Clark,ChaIrnon of thr Eoard
dr
CERTTFIED MAIL
May,l6, 1972
Mr. Robert Nott
Val I Aseoclatcr, Inc.P. O. Box 7
Val l, Colorado
SubJcct: Varlanco App I lcatlon
Dcor Bob:
Thls ls to Inforn you that a speclaf
becn gchcdulcd for Frlday, Mey 26 at
Of f I co.
Mr. Chuck Rosenqulst on behalf of Val
a scfback varl ancc of l0 r In l l eu of.,
the rsgt slde of thc neu bul ldlng.
Ydurs truly,
BOARD OF ZONING, APPEATS ANO EXAMINERS
- Val I 2l
varlance
9:00 a.m.
l2l hot
the requ I
nreetl ng
'ln the
appllod
red 'l 5 r
has
Torn
f or.
OR
D I ona l{ygant f or
dw
Robcrt Clork, Chalrrman of the Board
ROSENQ,UIST & ASSOCIATES
VrMg*@"il d dfufd"zad d"**
P. O. E|OX 686 VAIL, COLORADO 8I657
May 18 , 1972
Mr. Ed Struble
Building Official, Town of VaiI
VaiI , Colorado 81657
Dear Ed:
Thistetter is to memo our meeting of 5-15-72 about
side I ire restrictions and F.A.R. ratios for the VaiI 21
Building. It is my understanding that the Town Manager
Terry Minger has been consulted with and the side yards
are acceptable as shown including stairways with the following
exceptions:
a. North line which will be changed to include the
parking section on the north of the building.
b. A portion on the westerly line abutting Bob Lazier.
We have filed for a variance and will appear before
the committee on May 26 at 9:00 am to solve this
problem.
The F.A.R. which you arrive at requires a net square
footage with the 1.25 applied of 38,743 square feet. Our
square footage lot allocation is as follows:
Site B.
Parcel 1. 2,800@ 48.85%
Parcel 2. 2,09I @ 26.59"/"
Area 2.
Area 3.3,323.32@50%
Area 4
Total
32,068.22 t|mes 1.25 + =
We hereby agree to use (as shown above) only the
percentage interest of the parcels that have been deeded
to usfor computing the FAR on VaiI 21.
Your trulyffi/
15, 532 . l1
I, 358.00
1,367.80
I ,770.00
1, 661 . 60
10,378.65
32 ,068 .22
40, 085 . 28
Chuck Rosenqui
-r'--*-----...,/ \.
t\,r4J I 'tp, \ i/J
t.l
{.i
July 26,1912
f,lr. 8ob fllron
Mountoln ContfructorsP. 0, 8ox 1562
Vol l, Colorado
Ed $trub lr
Bul ldlag Of llclal
dr
cc! Ghuck Rostnqulst
Dear Bob:
As of thlt drt., thr bsl I dlng ptr*lt rntf plan chlck focot f 1,iltt.79 pl ur f400.00 clrraup deporlt havo not b.rnpald for thc Voll 2l proJrcf.
Pf.r!€ ser thrt thccr fert lrr peld noi lr?or thrn July 51.lf no?, a doublc frc yl ll be rcqulrcd rr al lored In Srctlon!05 (cl of thr 1970 Unlforn Bull'dlng Codl.
Your Inlrdlrte tttratlon to thlr naftrr rlll br rpproclatrd.
Slncrrcly,
TOn}| 0F VA|L
O t ,zbz'/4/ .//__ 4
MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION ril ,
Jurisdiction of
spaces only.
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATEO (IN THIS SPACEI THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PERMIT VALIDATION
Applicant to complete
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION cK. M.O. CASH
'a;/ J
{!se e errecxeo sx::r )I DE3C i,
PXON E LICE|IsE NO.
Aictat TEcT ot oEttcNEi LlcEfrsE NO.
l! AD Dt €5S PHONE
USE OF BUILOINO
8 CIASSOf WOrK: ENEW fI ADDITION EALTERATION N REPAIR
I Describe work:
Type ot Fuetr o'tt E6' Nar. Gas D t-pc. E
PERMIT FEES
SPECIAL CONOITIONS:
Air Cond. U nits-H.P, Ea.
U nits-H.P. Ea.
Gas Fired A.C. Uniis-Tonnsoe Ea.
Forced Air Svslems-B.T.U. M Ea.
Gravity Sysrems-B.T.U. M Ea.
Floor F urnaces-B.T.U.
Wall Heaters- B.T.U. M
Unit Heaters-B.T.U.NOrlcE ( |
THrs pERMrr BEcoMEs NULL ANo voro rr wb a*. oR coNsrRuc-
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITI+'{ @ DAYS. OF IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK ISSUSPENDEO OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCEO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ ANO EXAMINEO THISAPPLICATION ANO KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS ANO ORDINANCES GOVERNING THISTYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIEO WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEOHEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT OOES NOTPRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
Air Handlim Unit- C.F.M.
WHITE _ INSPECTOR CANARY _ AU DIT PIN K _ APPLICANT GOLOEN ROD _ TEMP, FI LE
Octobcr 19, 1972
Vel I Assoclates, lnc.P. 0. 8ox 7
Val |, Colorado
SubJcct: Enclosure Bul ldlng and 0fflce for Chalrllft f8
Gentl.mon!
I have chscked the plans for the ebove proJecf In conformance
slth tho 1970 Unlforn Bulldlng Code and flnd the follorlng ltems
rhlch must be correctcd by revlsed plang or addendum:
lcclosure Bul ldlng: Suggcstcd valuatlon $1,978.00I, Slll plotc to bc trectcd wood or foundatlon redrood - soctlon
2516 (c)3.
2. Anchor bolts to bE ll?" x l0rr mlnlmum, embedded Ttrlnto
concrete - Sectlon 2518 (a)
t. Studs sholl be l6n on center - Secflon 2518 (f).
4. Raf targ: 2rrxl 2tt , 24tt on center I I | | not support requ I red
65 pound llve load plus l0 pound dead load wlth l8f sPan -
Tsblo 25.5, Shor header detal I obovs a | | open I ngs.6. Shor rafety guordrrrl lg oround movlng equlpment.
7. Shor cantl levcr detal l.
0fflco: Suggcstcd valuailon $2,553.00l. Slll pliie to be trested vood or foundotlon redrood - Sectlon
2516 (c)f.
2. Anchor boltg to bc l/21'x l0'r mlnlmum, embedded Ttrlnto
concrole - Scctlon 2518 (a).
3. Studs shall'bc l6r'on csntsr - Sectlon 2918 (f).
4. Provlds reather rcclrtlve barrlers over gtuds - Scctlon
1707 ( a) .5. Raf tcrs z 2n X 8r', 24r' on ccnter wl t I not support re qul red
65 pound llvs load plus l0 pound dead load ct l0r spon -
Tab le 25.6. Show headcr deial I abovs a I I open Ings.
7 , Shor Intcrlor bearlng wa I I dctal | .I, Show are chan l ca l p l an.9. Provldc letter o? bcfhroon facl I ltleg authorlratlon of usage.
Yours tru l y,
TOI{N OF VA I L
Jcrry L. Aldrlch
J une 12, 1972
I'Jr. Th€oclor A. Grossman, J r.TAG Agsoc lates
15 l VIIlags Road, Route IParker, Colorado g0 lj4
Subject: Vall Zl proJect
0ear Mr. Grosernan:
The followlng revlE, of subJecf building performed by thlsofflce concsrne onry rocar irdrnances-such as parking, setbacks,etc' Ar I comrnunrcations regardrng this rstter gha t bo to thrsofflco. Any corimunrcatlons-""Julolng your archrtecturor andenglneering plan check shoulO 6c-Clrected to l.C.B.O. rlthcoples to thlg of f lce.
Your pormrt has becn rssuod to Mountarn consfructors subJect toPert.l,.choptor 3 0f the unliorr-oui rdrng codc, r970 Edlfronas odoptsd ond anendsd by the Tovn of volt. In reviowrng yourplans and documentg wrth regiro-io rocar ordrnances, I have thefo I lor I ng comments:
t.Pleaso submlt vour Condomlnfun Declaraflon as requlred bycororar,o Revts6d statuie iie:il-i to the Torn of vat .Erell ag to the sfate so that re may defermrne owner$htp ofcommon areas, r€spoftc l b l l l ty for ma l ntenance, "t..ln accoreiance w lth Sect lon
9mploy a speclal Inspector
<lur I ng construcf lon on th€
: . Concrsfe, I nc I ud i ng reb. Mason ry, I nc I ud I ng re Ic. Structura I stee Id. Procast conc rs te
505 (a) and tb), the ounEr shal Iwho shall be prosent at al I tlnresfo l loy lng types of work:
I n forcement
nforcemenl
Thls Inspector shail, n?1 g" snyono ernproyod by the "ont"o.to.dolng the work and shat t. b" ;;;;;ved by thts offico prtorto cornmencement of work l;;ri;;;: He gho' report to thoBuildlns; 0ffictat.in wrtttnt ;;;;"g any Code vlotartone andother roq u i red inforrnotlon.
Page 2Vail 2l plan Check
J une lZ, l972
r. J?;i,iJ-?:Jl?:"1:"::ro*ed to soclon 305 (c) resardrng
4. Subr;rlt ne*, slte plan showlng.entlre property Inctudtngparktns area rhar rs one ".litsroui ;;;;;i: As dtscussedrith Mr' Rosenqurst, 1,i.-*r r r-iuii"iv'irn.*. and setbackrequ I renronts. There are 5g, porring-r;":;; requ I red; th I sofrrce has.bean rnro.*"J iiri ue. rici;;;;-tn the parkfnostrucrrire fhat ls beion-oui rt.ir..ri viii-in'"on;unctron ir*,the Llft House and Lazici-iro.yects,
s' Pfease be Informod thof the burrdrng srte rhere work rs rnprogross 0r..msferrar rs bein6 etoroi ,u"i u" foncsd and nrorkes:i;irilHard Hat Areo'-'irii".izea-peiE;"""r"5"ry,, rype of
6' *:fli"",;"llJ;J:frtiij:i:ron or Land Aroca?ron rerre*fns
7 ' Tortet fact rflss on frrst fl?of. are of lnsuffrcrent srzero sGrv€ tho qccupangv road of.tir. iriit'"iJ second froorlesee spac€. applni i;, c-;; un I form p I umb I ng Code.8' Suffrclent vcntirotron and llyrrbfng- rough-fns shourd beingtar ted rn, rease iJir."l'a[rrng tnftrai construefron to3;:::"1"'ii:l::;.'n ;";;in;'cooi ai'n'i"tJl"iare vhen rhc
9' crorrficsflon-cf bolrer srze to be ugcd rs requrred such;;';':;i;l;il':ff,;lilg;"ii. ;-.;; r iil"r' i,'i", ns p.o,ii"a
ro. ?f;llfrJ;fllli.rlji:"*, €re ailored on 5,r verircar siock.
rr' I:":li:r"1,1il"t":(l':drarn and venr prprns on o sf nsre
Please submlt fhe above requrreci InlgrT"llon as soon as possrb rotn order ro avord rurrhe;-;;;;;;. I r r;rs-orii"J'"un be or any;;:i;l;1";,":.;i:"ti"'i"g";;;;; thrs prore*, ji"."" don,t
Yours tru I y,
TOWN oF VA lL
Ed Strub te8ul tding 0fflclal
cct Mountoln Constructorg
7 "BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Jurisdiction tt ftUl"t Ol U*;l
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
/b-o/I
u;/,
1[set rrrrcx:o sx: er I
I o Es cr.
MAI L AOOR E3S ZIP
2 V")/ z
MAIL AOOiESS FHONE LICENSE NO.
/v
aacHrrEcr oi 0 eytcNE R MAIL ADORES S FXON E LtcEl{3E NO.
MAI L AODRISs PXONE L IC EXSE NO.
I L ADOiESS EIANCH6 N/4
USE OF BUILOING
8 Class of work: Xlgw XnoorrroH tr ALTERATION O REPAIR f] MOVE E] REMOVE
9 Describe work: /- -1, -+ : J-
l0 Change of use from
pERMrr FEE ./ r'1l Valuationof work:$ 5bO.@
SPECIAL CONOITIONS:
Slze of Bldg.
(Total) Sq. Ft.
Flre SDrlnkl€13
Reoulred flyss !16PLANS CHECKED 8Y APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE AY:
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:
NOT ICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ANEIREOUIRED FOR EiIEC'TRICAL, PLUMB.
ING, HEATING, VENTILA\ING OR AIR CONDITIQ'OING.
THIS PERMIT SECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZEO IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF
CONSTBUCTION OR WORK ISSUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 OAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCEO.
ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS ANO OROINANCETYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A I
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATPROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAICONSTBIJEI ION j)R THE PERFORMANCE /.<
FI RE OEPT,
SOIL REPORT
OTHER (Spoclty)
PLAN CHECK VALIDATIOI\
WHITE - I NSPECTOF
WHEN PBOPERLY VALIDATEO (IN THIS SPACE THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PERMIT VALIOATION
PI NK - APPLICANT l?,, ,,..CANABY - AUDIT GOLDENROD -
a a
Nor" 6o n
t\' U66*{
\Ut^,yo,.rr
tlItt oF
.t a r
tl-
I
;
rL.
a
r-l
O
@O
@
@
z
August 17,
cc Robert Nott
Terry Minger
Larry Robinson
f0 filSURAtlCt C0VERAGI PR0Vl0t0- ,sco othor ide)
NoT foR tNItRIAIloNlt Att ro,o: ,.70._t.,..r.
Very truly yours,
Kent R. Rose, P.E.
Town Engineer
Ii..'i;T, ttoo
rrlrl tuu . rcrr, tvrlr.gtrv aroo, . ,ituo.c76-5613
L972
l{r. Chuck RosenguistVail, Colorado 81557
SUBJECT:parking structure for nLionshead Arcadern
and "Lift House."-
Dear Mr. Rosenquist:
Reference ls made to the meeting on april 27, L972 with Robe:t
Lazier, Chuck Rosenquist, tarry Robinson, Ed Struble and Robert
. N-ott in attendance. 'The subject of the discussion was the tine
llable reguired for construction to eommence on the joint-use
r ilarking structure for the three above mentioned buildings
Robert !!ott'represented the position of Vail Associates tlrat in
accordance with those understandings set forth in the contracts
nade with the building owners, construction of the structure
ras to commence during the surnmer of L972. Further, Nott stated
that Vail Associates would not support any variance application
on the part of Lazier and Rosenquist to defer construction of
thls structure untj.l a later bui'lding season.
To this date, the Torvn of Vail has not received an applicationfor a building permit or a complete set of structual plans and
calculations for approval. in regard to this structure. Structured
parklng must be provided for these buildings in order to comPlywlth the zoning and parking regulations set forth by the Town
of lail.
Time is of the essence in the commencement and completion of the
construction of the joint-use parking structure as absolutely
no permit of occupancy will be issued for "Lionshead Arcader"
"Vail 2Ir" or "Lift House" until parking is supplied.
Please submit the required plans, specifications and calculati.ons
as soon as possible to avoid further delays. If this office can
be of further assistance at any tirne regarding this natter, please
contact us.
t
RECEIPT FOK CERTIFI MAIL-30c (plus postage)
ex?rc lcc rcquir
nETUnH \ l. Siows to thom and d.t! d€liv.r8d . lldli:ttli )' .'"Jli$;:li"'"'"l'.'iilJ'li'*;". 3llSERVICES Z Wrtl ,r€t lery to addressee onrv ........ 85i
qr7
rAr
PROJ ECT
The signatures below certify that the following excerpts from
the 1970 Uniform Building Code, as amended and adopted by the
Town of Val l, Colorado, have been read, understood and wi ll be
adhered to:
Sect i on 302 (a) Approved p lans shal I not be changed, modif ied,
or altered wifhouf written authorizstion from the Building Officlal
TOI.JN OF
BU I LD I NG PERM IT
Sect ion 304 (b) The Inspection
VAIL
S UPP LEME NT
permit does not glve
code, or any other
0f f icial from ihere-
card shall be read, filled out
y in the waterproof holder furnlshed
not cover up any work not signed
LDING SHALL BE USED OR OCCUPIED EITHER
UNTIL THE BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS ISSUED
AS PROV IDED FOR HERE IN.
any s i gn ( tempo ra ry o r pe rmanent )
shall be approved by the Town of Vai I
Gontracfor and ALL subconfracfors
Town of Vail Drior to the starf of
Section 502 (c) The lssuance of a building
authority to violate any provlsions of this
Ord inance and sha I I not prevent the Bu i I d i ng
affer requirlng fhe correction of same.
Section 506 (a) (d) N0 BUIffiRARtLY
A CERT I F ICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Ord inance l5 ( 1967) Before
in full andby the Bull
of f by Buil
may be used
Sign Review
Ord i nance 2
posted consp icuous I
d ing Department. Doding Inspector.
or posfed, lt
Comm i ttee
( 197 | ) Genera I
licensed wlth theshall be
any work.
wner
UA,.L
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
The foregoing affi
swo rn to before rne
davit and declaratl
, a Notary Public,
on tracto r
l) ss
1
on was
by
t9fhis
'My Comm i ss i on Exp i res
( sEAL )
71 - .
/l\y Co;irrriss cn e;.:,:irus r,rie:.,2d, I 9zJ
+a,
/in
-^ --t .t-r, irr.c. r-il. J-^;-
Octoben 20, 1972
Mn. .Tenny Aldnich
Building Official'rown or v at_-r
P.0. Box 100Vai1, Color.ado
Dean Mn. Aldnich:
This is to authonize the use of Vail Associates, Inc.
nestroorn facil-ities on the ground floor of the LionsHead
Centne for use by occupants of the lift housing buildings
to be constructed at the base of Chairlift #8. These
nestroom facilities arle within 200 feet of the proposed
structures.
Youns veny truly t
VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC.
J. F. Meadows
Ra6l- Estate Engineering
AREA CODE 303 476-560r BOX 7. VAtL. COLORADO 81657
box too r vail, colorado gt65z 303.476.5613
Decemben 12, 1972
Mn. Robent T. Lizien
Mn. Chanles Rosenouist
Vail, Colonado 81657
Re: Conditiornt Occupancy - Lift House "*@
Gentlemen:
ln accondance with oun agneement concenning the subject buildings, the
follouring conditions must be met in onden to allow occupancy of centain
commencial aneas of the Lift House ard Vait 21:
1. Tenants who ane neady to open befone the Chnistmas
season witl be ailowed to occupy the commencial space
-g!bl. No othen occupancy wilt be allowed until the parking
stnuctune is complete and a final inspection has been rrnde
and centificates of occupancy issued. It is undenstood that
the fotlowing tenants will be neady to open unden the condi-
tional occupancy: Hanvest Table, Puncellrs, Gonsuch Ltd.,
Gone Valley Titte, LionsHead Ski Rentals, the Genenal
Stone, The Place, Knisrnan, and Sassy Set.
2. Each tenant who wi.shes to move in beFone this deadline
sflatt be nequined to ncti.fy the Building Depantment and it
will, at that time, be detenmrned if adequate parking is
available. In each case, the Buitding Depantment will take
into considenation the public safety, numben oF spaces
nequi.ned and available, adequate access to those spaces,
as well as considening if atl Buitding Code nbquinements
have been met and a final inspection made of each shop.
3. No occupancy wilt be allowed fon any condominium anea
in eithen building until the panking stnuctune is complete and
a final inspection of the stnuctune has been made.
,i.. \.'./L. n.so ncmind you that all ta.p iccs i,i-ri. r)e pard beFone
a conditional occupancy penmit will be issued and the tenant
allowed to ooen fon business.
Paga 2
Mn. Robent T. Lazien
Mn. Chantes Rosenquist
Decemben 12, 1972
5. Constnuction debnts and piles of dint and snow must be
nemoved befone we will considen the panking useable. Tl'te
anea on the nontheast side of the Vait 21 building which is
being used fon constnuction debnis m.rst be fenced ofF fon
pubtic safety and to deten use of the nonth entnance to the
Vait 21 building. Doons exiting into constnuction aneas must
be rnanked rrFon Ernengency Exit Onty.tr
Inspections will be rnade on a negulan basis and summons will be issued to
the pnopenty ownens fon each violation of the above condittons.
Town Managen
TJM:th
cc: Hanvest Table
Puncellrs
Gonsuch Ltd.
Gor.e Valley Title
LionsHead Ski Rentals
The Genenal Stone
The Ptace
Knisman
Sassy Set
ao
zz
mo
Sincenely,
Fob ruary 8, 1972
Mr. T. J. Koyanatsu
lntornational Conference of liul ldlng Cff lcials
I 16O South ltorkman I'l | | | Fload
i{hlttler, Cal llornla 90601
5ubJect: Prellmlnory Plon Checks - Vall 21 , Itol lday llous6,' and Antlers
Jear Tak:
ln reference to val I 2l General coroments, liern l, pleasc note
In our 0rdinance 6 that any floor rhether lt ls underground or
not ls classlflerj E5 a story lf lt ls uced for hobitatlon of
irfiy forn. ltem 4, Frel inrlnary commsnts, agaln rlth rcference to
our 0rdlnanco 6, it ls a llttle more rostrlctlve regardlng
etandplpos. This rhould be polnted ouf on al I prellmlnory
checks, esP€clal ly rhere our slmendfiont uculd apply and yours
wou ldn rt i n regard to storl es .
\.,1 | th ref ercnce to t'lo I I {ay Houg€, I tem 5, l{on-Structura I Comments,
wood dccklng an<l bcoms, Holldoy House Plans t9 upply for a varlance
on fhlr polit. Although I agree wlth you on ths requl remont'
Vall has a uniqu€ problen In as nuch as thoy are trylng desporofely
to keep tha archlfecture alplne In chlracter. The varlance bo'rd
has had nony moetlngs on thls and are of the oplnlon at thls
polnt that if lt ls heavy tlmbor and flre rotordant freated at
roof level only, fhat this rould be reasonably safo' I wlll l6t
you knorv fhe cutconro of this varlonca. There wl ll be anOthor
prollrnlnary coorlng to you call€d I'Lodge at vallll thaf ha5 a
slrnllar condltlon that the varloncs board rll I hear tonorrow.
For your infor6atlon, we wlll heve another a6rendrnent to the COde
shortly which wlll lnvolve tho followlng:
l. All vonti latlon and exhoust equipnrent shall be enclogcd in
a shoft onclosurs anc vented through the roof. The shaft
enclosure shall bo In accordanc. rlth Sectlon 1706 (-s) and (b).
shlps ladders l{ill no l.onger be allowed as pormitted ln our
Ord i nance 6 .
2.
Page 2
| . c .6.0.
Feb ruary E, l91Z
Ed 5frub letiul ldlng Of f lcial
dw
3' Ouard rarrs shalr be not ress ?han 5g'hrgh In ,eu of 42'rhlgh as provlded In Sectlon 1714.
rl€ are also arJoptrng the rgTr supprement. rf you nave any gu€s-tlons or cornrnenf s regardrng the se rovrslons, we wourd apprecf atehearlng f rom you.
He are srso In fhe proceSs of revrslng our zoning ordfnonce whrchI undersfand you have nothrng to oo wittr as fo. J, pran checks'rre concerned; how6ver, thore ls one thrng r"gurJing zoning thftl^lll:l_r"",11 !:lp tf you *"rr,r-remtnd peopte of and rhailssetbecks. An ex6mpre wourd be-rf rhere ls more rh;;;;;'u,1irolne,;:r;::"oll::_:l^o:?l:ily,:f- r"o bu | | dr nse-w r ir,-a'property | | no
?:t::;1, ::::--' n e I ther' case ;-'';; i ;,;;";; lo i"oltfi;i";;Y' I i li"
J,n.gt9slfs, glvo.John nry thanks for the copy of the artrcro onva | | I n the Los flnsg rgs'r lmeil- He rn l ght bo r ntereste<J to knowthat slncE th-lr arf'E6 *r-;tnled, varf lras ayordod the t976olymplcs (orprne evsnfs) whrch wril tro herd about s€ven milesfrom hsro at [Jeaver creek. N;"liess to soy fhtg ut t quadrupreour bu I ld i ng ln th ls area
Also, lt rs of interest to note that rasf year *,€ drd a totar of$6'c00,0oo in constructrGn whlch Incruded iig riitng rnrts prugco'nmercial end rernoder work. Thfs yeor we have had archffeefgfn fhls offrce wLin tr"ti*inory"prnn" ror appro"i'i.t. ry 75e unrts,
;:1."?:ll'If;,:":f;rci a | , etc. 's!, you can took roryord ro a busy'
Yours tru ly,
To}iii OF VA I L
l:*ll\":'iTT-v
.Iob
.f t e"so- /.) a. i^ /i.,n ,r./ -ft: " f
'l{r*e-e are dc-,te*a,.{ .f a{p,",.,4;'
"ltrf ,'!n ,a{ fi4"1 drzA '?at//:.-t"*
lrEo. A l//*F*ttt(t o.-,// i- a,r,
k'-e,:?:e- &pV ,Fac,rtt_tc f
f oLlF,t:d ,9R I 0 E_ -i-o v/lR_t/|t/( 4:-
Fe'7eR/r?//:-,fl*f/^N ApF pd,ue
A:,' \./dV k or..t)tJ EtS* & /p?.+i/
({tl.ue T? F /.' Ffu(.47et.
:-
..1
,Above ite-ms
Soatt 3s
shall be co
P4 t*3(€
-2-
PRELIMINARY CO{MEMS:
1. Reference Sheet A/L. In conpliance with Section 1903 (b), all
openings in exterior wal1s within 20 feet of property lines
should be protected with 20-minute labeled assemblies. It
appears that only the north portion of the east side fronts on
a yard or street having the necessary width. A11 other eleva-
tions will be affected bv Ehis c otrEnent. This includes balconies.
2. Exits:.
(.) An exterior exit balcony should be 50 percent open to the
outside in order to quaLify for this classification. Sec-
tion 3301 (c). Based on the 9-foot 8-inch fLoor to floor
height, the concrete spandrel, and the wood raiL in Detail
7lA-7, the minimum opening has not been furnished. A1-
though not related to exit requirements, we should also
mention that the opening to the exterior should be 65 per-
cent if windows along the balcony are intended for required
light and ventilation. See Exception 3 under Sectlon 1305(a).
As srmrption wiLl be made that plans submitted for final re-
view will properly indicate these minimrrms.
(b) Corridors should comply with Section 3304 (h). Attention
is directed to the glazed openings along corridors formed
by retaining walls at Ehe firsc level-. The conment is
valid as long as the retaining walls and other obstructions
reduce the openings to the outside Eo less than 50 percent.
The same situation holds true at corridors on other 1evels
where doors should be 2O-rninute assemblies and windows
glazed with wire glass fixed in steel sash.
(c) Stair "At' is considered an enclosed stair and therefore
subject to the requirements of Section 3308. Two-hour
wal1s and one-and- one-hal-f-hour 1abeled door assemblies are
required as cuc-offs fro'm the balcooy area.
(d) Stair rBtt should also be enclosed as required in Section
3308 since it serves more than one adjacent floor as a re-
quired exit to avoid a dead end condition in excess of 20
feet. Additionally, the corridor at the fourth 1eve1 from
the foot of the stairs Eo the exterior exit balcony at the
north should conply as a Ewo-hour exiE enclosure. This in-
volves a corridor serving other f l-oors which is noE exempt
under Exception L of Section 3308 (a).
3.
-3-
(.) Based on the north elevation, occupants for stair I'Arr must
proceed along the second 1eve1 trbalconyt' behind the re-
taining wal-1 to have access to stairs leading to grade'
Reference is made to our exterior exit balcony discussion
in Corrnent No. 2 (a). If ccnpliance is not possible,
windows and doors to the Lease area must be one-and-one-
half-hour Labeled fire assemblies to comply with Section
3308 (d).
(f) Sleeping roqns below the fourth story should have windows
conplying with Section 1304.
(g) Openings beEween intermediate rails are limited to 9
inches. Section 1714. See Detail 4l A'12.
The building shoul-d c omp 1-y as a Type II structure.
(a) A11- floor openings should be enclosed with two-hour shaft
wal1s.
1) Reference Section ll A-4. In order to provide the
proper cut-off between the shaft above the third LeveL
and the trash and linen roons at Ehe third level, No' 18
gauge co!.lars or mineral wool packing, or equivalent
protection should be provided as a cut-off between the
duct face and the perimeter of che opening at the fourth
leve1.
2) A1-1 openings into duct shafts should be protected with
one-and-one-haLf-hour label-ed assemblies.
(b) The trash room at the third leveL should be separated from
the rest of the building arith a one-hour separation' Door
A-2 should be a labeled one-hour assembly. Section 1706 (c) '
(c) A11 fLoors should be troo-hour fire-resistLve construction
and roof one-hour fire-reslstive construcEion. Use of fire-
resistive ceilings to achieve this is permissible provided
all requirements for the ceiling are complied with. This
includes limitations on areas of ceiling openings such as
recessed Lighcing and air registers in addition to being
p rotec te d.
- IL-
(d) We note that specifications are geared to U. S. Gypsun
products of which we have many fire-resistive ceilings
covered under research recorrnendations . Eowever, use
of Type C L/2-inch gypsum board in certain areas for two-
hour fire-resistive construction may be in question.
Substitution of any type in the approved tested system
are subject to challenge.
(e) A fire-retardant roof is required. Wood shing1e roof
on 2 x 2 sl-eepers does not corply. Fire-retardant roofs
using wood shingles or shakes require specific installa-
Eion procedures under Research Rec onnnendat ions 2453 or
2638 for Koppers or Baxter roofs.
(f) Speciflcations for sprayed fireproofing on structural
members are possibLe under several research recorrmendations.
However, we guestion the use of this type of fireproofing
under conditions indicated in details such as 4 & 8/A-9
and 7/A-10. Attactments for architectural treatments appear
to interrupt the continuity of the fire protection.
Wet and dry standpipes are required as set forth in Chapter 38.
5. Reference Details 5 and 9 on Sheet A-9. Duct board deck requires
compliance with Section 1904 (a). Attention is also dLrected to
prohibited locations under Section 3309 (f).
6. Reference Detail 4/ A-9. Use of multiple layers of wood blocking
exceeds that intended under Section 1705 (d).
7. Dwelling units shoul-d have windows, including openable portions,
complying with SecEion l-305 (a). If this is not furnished mechani-
cal ventilation as seE forth in the same section should be conplied
with.
8.
o
Reference General Note No. 1 on
pound per square foot l-ive l-oad
balconies as seE forch in Tabl-e
Sheet S-1 of pi-ans. One-hundred-
is required for exterior exit
No. 23-A.
Smoke-proof encLosure should extend to the roof. Section 3309 (a).
A11 data ls bel.ng
PLease feel free
held pending
to contact ua
-5-
further
lf there
instructlons from you.
are any questlons.
Yours very tru1y,
INTERNATIOML CoIFERENCE
OF BUII"DNTG OFFICIALS
T.IK:JN:bb
cc: Theodor A.Grossman, Jr. (TAG Assoclates)
Koyaoatsu
Plan Check Eog Laeer
//20 I
Jurisdiction
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
WHEN
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE - I NSPECTOR
BUILDING
Y VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE THIS IS YOUR
PERMITcK.
I oE5 C r.fi[ste rrucx:o sr:erl
MAI L ADOiESS "'iYg- s^'o
MAIL AooiEss /14 t_ [olo .
CHITECT OR O E3I CN Ei 9fl"a u;ie3/o LlcEt{5E lto.
4-! La- tr
ENGINEER LtcENSE l{O.
t1-1t. /94
MAIL DOiESS EiANCH
IJSE OF BIJILDING
7 (.o Arro 0
8 CIASSOfWOTK: ETEW trAODITIOil trALTERATIOil trREPAIR trMOVE DREMOVE
l0 Change ol use from
Change ol use to
11 Valuation of work: $PERMIT FEE
Occupancy
^Group R € F2
Slz€ ot Bldg.
(Tolal, Sq, Ft.
::""" ec L Flre Sgrlnkl€rt
Requlrod E\.os ENo
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:
NOTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REOUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB-
ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AtR CONDITIONING.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCEO WITHIN @ DAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 OAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCED.I HEREBY CERTIFV THAT I HAVE REAO ANO EXAMINED THISAPPLICATION ANO KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE ANO CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THISTYPE OF U/ORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEDHEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT OOES NOTPRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THEPROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATTNGCONSTRUCTION OR THE/PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
'&----t '/-3,/-1'L-3IGNAYUiE OF CONTFACTOi OF AUTqOiIZED AGENT IOATE
HEALTH DEPT.
/ f, 7s-. z"
CANARY - AUOIT PIN K - APPLICANT
ALIDATIO
P/t
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Jurisdiction
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
WHEN PROPERLY VALIOATED
cK. M.O. CASH
CANARY - AUDIT
q '/ttzl//
| 0EscR.
(LlsEE arracx Eo sx€Er,
2tC PHOXE
PHON E LICENSE NO.
AFCHITECT OR OESI'CN€F L ADDREs S FHON E I I C EitSE NO.
MAI L AODiES5 PHONE LtcENSE lt O.
MAI L AODRE5 S BRANCH
U5E OF EU I!OI'{ G
8 CIas oI worK: d,,* ! AODITION tr ALTERATION I] REPAIR f] MOVE D REMOVE
l0 Change of use {rom
1l Vafuation olwork: $ J OO0 . "o PLAN cHEcK ree /1.
SPECIAL CONDITIONST
Slze ol Bldg.
(Total) Sq. Ft.
Flre Sprinklcrs
Requlred lyss lNq
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:No. of
Dwelling Unlts
NOTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS AEE REOUIRED FOR ELqCTRICAL, PLUMB-
ING, HEATING. VENTILA{'ING OR AIR CONDITI
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORIIDB CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCEO WITHIN 60 OAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENOEO OF ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCE D.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINEO THISAPPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORFALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS ANO OROINANCES GOVERNINGTYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIHEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT OOESPRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCELpRovlsroNs oF AN\/ orHER STATE oR LocAL LAw REGULdcoNsTRUcTIoN oR THE PERFoRMANCE oF coNsTRUc']
M.4..
d. a oPLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE - INSPECTO R PIN K - APPLICANT NROD - TEMP. FI LE
ZEILEFI AN GiFIAY lNc.o
El
I22 EAST I9TH AVENUE
D€NVER. COTORADO 80203
PHONE: 303 -222 - 8668
November 10, 1972
Mr. Jerry Aldrich
Building Inspector
Town of Vail
Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Jemy:
Thank you for the time you spent with me Thursday, November 2, 1972,
dlscuss'ing the llail 2l and Lions Square III projects. As per our
agreement, I haveJfrET-uded a response to the "comment remain" questions
submitted to us by ICBO. In our meet'ing, we reviewed these questions
and lt was felt that through our submlttal to you, the ICB0 p'lan checkwill be satisfied.
If you have any questions about any of
The submittal is attached along with a
asked by ICB0.
Thanks again for helping us. It was a
was one of the few experiences I have
from a building official.
the items, please ca'll us.
copy of the original questions
pleasure meeting with you and
had in getting positive answers
Sincerely,
ZEILER and GMY, INC.
PRP/db
Encl s:
cc3 The TAG Assoc.
Paul R. Pennock,
Pri nc'lpal
VAIL 2I CONDOI',IINIUMS
RESPONSE TO ICBO PLAN CIIECK
The item number corresponds to the question number on the original ICB0 p'lan
check.
Item 3. The combustib'le roof shingles have been changed by the architect
to a Class A asphalt shlngle which has been approved by your office.
The we'lght of the asphalt sh'lngles are approximately 306 pounds per
square whlch compares with the 3 pounds per square foot used in the
oriEinal design.
Item 5(b)2). The owner is aware that the maximum llve load in the un'leased area
is 75 pounds per square foot. Thls wi'll a1low the space to be used
for such occupancies as offlces, retail stores or hotel accomnoda-tions. ln thd space leased to the restarant, the ioists in the
kltchen have been checked for concentrated loads and will be satis-
factory for the given arrangement.
Item 5(c)2). The plans cal'l for vertical high strength reinforcing of #4's at
4r-0'on center and horizontal reinforcing of standard Dur-o-wa'l
at 8" with 2-#4's ln continuous bond beams located at each f'loor.
Thls reinforclng provides a total area of steel of 0.164 square
inch per square foot compared to the code requirement of 0.'183
square inch per square foot. Since we have used high strength
relnforcement (yie'ld strength - 60 ksl), the area of steel provided
is equivalent to using 40 ksi - #5 bars at 4'-0 on center which
satiifies code requir6ments (0.2'14 square inches per square foot).
t,Je use the same grade of reinforcing bars throughout a proiect
to eliminate the possibility of confusion by having different
grades of reinforcing steel on the site. The larger bars also
increase placing costs and increase the difficulty in grouting
around the bars. Additional reinforcing around openings has been
specified in the General l,lotes on Sheet S-1.
Item 6(b)2). ICBO has not given approval for the use of "Wheeling Tensilform 50"
as a shear diiphragm because thejr laboratories have not specifically
tested this product. However, the laboratories at l'lest Virginia
Universities'have conducted tests on "Tensilfonn 50" and have
determined that the steel deck will provide an ultimate shear load
for ioist spacing up to 3 feet on center of 2ll pounds per linear
foot. [hen'a faitoi of safety of 2.4 is applied' the allowable
load becomes 88 pounds per linear foot. The maxjmum shear force in
the build'lng occirrs in the stair wall on line (Br) at the roof
level and'is 65 pounds per linear foot. t{e have-included a copy
of the tlheeling catalog sheet which shows the same values for
d'laphragm loading as the l,lest Vlrginia tests indicated.
"Whee'ling Tensilform 50" is a popular steel deck in the Denver area
and has 6een used on a number of previous buildings 'in Vai'| .
Page
Vai 1
-2
2l Condominiums
ttem 6(b)3).
Item 6(b)4).
Item 6(b)5).
Item 6(b)6).
Item 6.(b)7).
Item 7(a).
Item 7(b).
lle have included in the submittal a calculation sheet show'ing that
the stresses in the unll on line (5) do not exceed the code
allornble. UsinE a cracked moment of inertia to calculate the
overturning stresses and adding the total vertical load on the
wall, the maximum stresses are 230 psi which'is less than the allow-
able 249 psi. Therefore, the wall is satlsfactory.
All critical shear walls, i.e., short walls ln north-south direction,
have all cells fully grouted. Maximum allowab'le shear on the full
area on any of these walls is 7.5 psi which is well below the 20 psi
a'l I owed .
It is the intent of our design to transmit a'll lateral 'loads
through continuous vertical shear wa'l'ls to the foundation.
Section F-3/3 indicates how studs on the top and bottom of the
steel beams are used to transfer the shear force from one ]eve]
to the next. Consequently, there ls no maJor change in shear
reslstlng elements.
Overturnlng compress'ive forces have been consldered on a'l 'l walls
used as shear walls ln conJunction with the app'lied vertical 'loads
and all of the resulting pressures satisfy code requirements. The
maximum condJtion occurs at the walls on llne (5) which were dis-
cussed in ltem 6(b)3).
The precast columns, or 'ln some cases steel columns, may be used
to reslst overturning forces for tro reasons: l). Besides the
bond force between the masonry and structural column, there are
metal anchors from the column to the masonry as spelled out in
the specifications. 2). The co'l umns are supporting structural
beams wh'lch are direct'ly attached to the wa11 preventing uplift.
The load in the beam can then be transferred directly to the column.
l,le have also changed a note on section F-l /2 to read: Provide
2" x 6" x 5" keys at 12" on center - fu'l 'l height of wall. The
contractor was aware of this change and has buj'lt the structure
accordingly.
The Unit Masonry section of the spec'ifications indicate that the
maximum size aggregate to be used in bond beams and masonry unit
cells shall be 3/8", which complies wjth Uniform Building Code
Standard No. 24-24-70.
This item refers to sections on the draw'ings which relate to the
question in ltem 6(b)l). The sections were originally quest'ioned
by ICBO as to how the shear load was transferred from the concrete
siab to the masonry walls. In our response to 6(b)l), we explained
how the force was transferred through the end of the stee'l ioists
without exceeding the allowable stresses. lle sent calculations
to them to verify the loads and they agreed with us, since Item
6(b)l ) was satisfied. Consequently, the sections are satisfied as
well.
Page - 3
Vai'l 2l Condominiums
Item 7(c).
Item 7(d).
Item 7(e).
Item 7(f&g).
Item 7(b).
The calcu'lations for the deslgn of the retainlng wa1ls are shown
on $heet 44 of our orlElnal calcu'latlons. Because of the porous
rntenlal retained by the wal1, very lltt'le hydrostatic pressure
wil I occur. Hov',ever, lf the wa] I should retain water, the stresses
wll'l not be exceeded. Mlnimum relnforcing is satlsfled for a'l'l
loading conditions.
The anchorage of the masonry wa'l'ls shown ln sectlons C/3 and E/5,
as required by Section 23'13 of the Unlform Bullding Code, is
provlded by the wal'l reinforclng whlch is continuous through the
concrete slab. The bearing force on the #4 reinforclng bars
prcvldes-'l/2)',(2Ut'1.(750 psl) /4' = 240 PLF which satlsfies the 200
PLF minlmum requlrement of the code.
The calcu1ations for the concrete precast balcony railings are
shown on Sheet 45 of the original calculatlons. They lnd'icate
the panels are not overstressed when spannlng the full 24 feet.
As you ane aware, the concrete panels were swltched to non-'load
camylng (except for the wind) wood panels whlch are also capable
of spannlng 24 feet.
Where the contractor could not pass the relnforcing bars past the
steel beam, he wi'l'l provide dowe'ls welded to each flange that wi]l
lap wlth the unl'l reinforcinE.
The stee] beam to concrete beam connection shown in section C-3/5
does not uti'lize embedded anchor bolts, and therefore, does not
fa]'l under the jurisdiction of Table No. 26-I. The connection
was designed by the Shear-Friction Theory and Ultinnte Strength
Analysis and provides an allowab'le u'ltimate load of 20.7 kips.
The actua'l ultimate load is 2'1.2 kips. l.le have inc'luded a copy
of the calcu'lation which indicates the connection will satisfy
the loading requirements.
n
t,'i:
,;,iill'
:il,
, rilt,l
'"1 'r l,
I'iii
,'tj,
ir|l
',,'i','1:. ri , firt
' :l 11,;
,,i!
i,ir;li
:l,rrliil
,,',.i
, ,iil'i'
, ;,,'li"
'iiitl''t
',"0],;,,
,l,.ll: :;rrii
{r.ii:il
;;i!;lr
. ,,il
'.,r1,,r
1;,;1ii
':,';1,
r!r'll
June 12, 1972
Ed Strubla
Bulldlog Offlelal
Ctty of VotI
Bot 100
ValI, Colorado 81657
D66? Mr. Strublo!
Plan Check No. 8552
Project: Val.1 21
Solosrlc Zone No. 1
1970 Unlform Bulldlng Codc
STRUCTUTAL RBVIEI,'
lbla letter eupcrcodeo our otructural revlew lottar for
the oublect proJect, dated l{ay 18, 1972. Thc structural
dsta hae boon revler'red for cmpllanco wlth the Unlforo
Dutldlng Code end our c@enta foll$,r;
sl&usFst,Q0li4Ntsi
1. Spoclal tncpeatloi'ln eonforrnance ntth Sectlon 305 ts
requl.red frr tbe fol.lorlng work:
(o) Strrrctural concr€t€ nhere the dealgn ls baged on' an ultloate conpreaaive Strength ln exeeee of
2000 pouodo par oguero lneh.
(b) A11 reld{og eacopt shere dsne tn the shop of an
approved fabrlcator. Not6 the axtenslve fleld
ueldlng Includl,ng aluds and decklng.
2. Ttre f,oundaclon Lnvee r,l.gacion repof,t montl.oned ln plane
waa not lnoluded ln daca fonoarded to uo. It should
be ssblaltted for revlew.
' Coobugttble roof conotructlon doea not rneet, requLre-
ments of, Typo II conotruccton. .Dead loads for a non-
cmbuEtlble gro-hour f tre-rea lgtlve eone truc t lon trlth
a ftrE retardsnt roof covurlng phould be Juotlfled for
the 19 pounda per squaro foot ueed ln doolgn.
4. Structural changes wtll be regutred to coopLy wtth oxtt,
co'ndltlonc rnenttored ln Nonatnrctural Cannent No. 2 (a)
of, our latt€a datcd l,lay 11, 1972.
,'.!l
.r,liil
'dr.
.1!,t
.,:.1
.s
't:
i
.2-
Dra tgn-6tglcal Ana lyr 1r.
(r) Roo! ,otrti por aalonlallon thtst 2 requlreo atecl Jolrt
l2H6 at 2-toot oentatl wtrere lpam are 24 feet. Freolng
plen oa thect 86 shotra 5 each, 1284, betsaeu Ltnes 1-2
and 2-3. Clarlflcatloa le requtrrod. See aloo, 6 lavel
frerolng plan. Nogc alao that any chaage resultlng fro
C@€nt Io. 3 above ehould bo concldered.
(b) Floor Ltvs Loadrr
1) A11 publte qorrldore and publlc bal.corrlee, lncludlng
thote oa the upper levele, requlre a L00-pound pcr
square foot llve lood. Table No. 23-A. Roof Jolotr
12fi6 rpanntng 24 foet have a l1ve load capaelty of
155 )pornda per foot. lJLth epactng at 2-foot ceatert,
balconlee. 8oo, for oxaorplo, 6 lovel framlng plan,
,,''r Shget 86. Noto that, tn accordance lrlth theet B of
calculatl,ons l2lt6 opamrln;j 24 feat ehould be epacodat X8-loch ceat@re. Balcony beame ehould aloo be
redeatgned 1o1' 1Q$-pormd per equare foot ll.vE 1oad.
2) laaee opace on- tho f,trst level shotrld be deslgned' for an eppronrlnate 100-pound per equare foot llve
load unloss the epectf,te ueo le noted on plane. 8e€
offlcee and atores ln table No'. ?3-A and thlrd para-
gtaph of Sectl.oa 2302 (b).
' (e) thr6t 5 of, caleulatlone apeclf,y w16lt31 roof bean at
bewego B aud C. Plano eho'r wt6X26. Clarlflcatlon
quoetod.
(d) llerlga lor lll2X98 on thoet 13 of calculatlooa acaounts for
conceutrated loads and roof and floor loaila lmpoaed frm
abwe but dleregar4a dead l,oad of 8-1nch concrete block
taalle srtendlng for four levelo above. Clarlflcatlon le
roqueetsd.
(o) Refereoes cglc$latl.oo Shset 14 snd General Noce 4 qr Sbeot
sl.
1) Ptano ohquld epeclfloally ctate llghtwolght block.
(^.
Ltne 5
1r rt-
'* ,. :,.- ?;F:,
' J: .t.
, 'li :
' | 4'.
"''4irl,i.;,. Jlr'Iitr
:':'r'
I
.r;,\ i:,
,{i;r..1iiir
':iilJr'; '
'!.
. ,i;lJi .
', iilf:
i:'luL
Il"
liit,rr
ir!
t, i
' t,,
' 'i1 ';;'''
'
'rfirir..,,;"ili,
, r;f,,1 ,i,,
, lrrj11lrr
,i.ti..r.
.. , ,,,,,,i,
.'Iii'ri't.
,,i I I' Ii lii:1. '
',ii;,:;
'i ;r,;' '
,,ii
iril
'ii:,
1F
'f ,ii
,ir!,, ,,,it.
' i
jtl'
r,l1,rq
'.i
'{lir
+. .:">.
I
i
li.rr
lt{lt .'
i.
t'li ,t l, ,
i
,i'i,
,. i, I .,, rtlf" !,ilr,n; i rl^,t r!
-t-
(t) Vcrtlcal llo. 4 at 4 fcst 0 lneh on contsr and
gtandard Dur-O-l{at alona at I lnchea oo ecotsr
do not Gosply ttlth gcctloos 2418 (J)-3. Therc
1o no aecurance of yall openlngs. Dstallt do
not alwayg oall for specLal rslnf,orceueat ep€sl-
fl.ed ls calculatlou.
(l) Relcreoeo $bcot 15 of calculsttonr. Thtrd levet floc
bee ls erppoftlng cqcenry walls fr@ four levele raehar
tban thrGo at tb6 nortb ulng.
(g) Ile0lgn ohold bo provlded for ooncrete bean ehqln on
th€6t 87.
(b) Calculactorr Shcat No. 8l rpectfted a ItlOX?5 roof boan
&t Llnq 2 noer 81. Plana rhow H10te1. Clarlflcatlo 1o
requfred.
(f) Pbna ebqrld olarlfy locatlon of Itl0:O3 rldge beam betweca
Llnoa I and C cmputed on ShsGc 25 of salculatlme.
6. tatoral Dealgn.
(a) Bofsronce oolculision the€t 48-511 Wtnd zone of, 35
poqrds per aquare foot le raqul.rcd per your Lnetfuctloa!.
Celculattonr thould be revlacd accordlngly
(b) Refcrcncc calculetlon theste 5?-57. A morE coopletelateral enatryal,e te requlred to prop€rly aubitenrlatc thcctnletural gyatco ln roeletlng lateral loade. fhe follor-
lng csllraat8 rsf,lect s@o of, the ltema ln questl,on.
1) Ualng Seceloos D/2 aad F/3 as typlcal exarnplea of
dlephrepr conneoGl,ooo to ah6ar natlo, there 16 no pool.
tlve connectton. Ac ncnr dotalled, thE steel deck reld.
Log to tho Jolot and rho Jo{st valdlng to baee platea
ate the only rneanc of tranafer. A coatlnuoua englc or
e &nl,lar aonbcr parallol and at the raa11 to Eranafar
deck ehear ts neceesory.
i2) Wbeellng Tensllfolrn 50 1o nor approved for uee al a" dfaphragm. Boe thr oncloaed reeearch recornsndo cloo.
An approved dEck ahould be uaed or the concrete f111
should coply. Fof th€ lott€r, dorellng to the uEllutll be neeersary,
rfl
t.'il,
ll:,i
!l'r
o
.4-
{ !) lb latotal rnalyck h thE Rorth-oouth dlroctl,on\-/' ulthh rrforince Llnea D1r G, I aod 5 appeare qulte
crlttcal frco tbe roof to ths tecond lavel. nell
on Ltne I should b6 chackad for axlal cmpreeolon
dus to oFotturnlBg fotccq plus the dead and llve
loado oupported.
Allswsblc 6bsar ln Eeaonry ebsar ualls ts ltnlted
to 20 pounilc por oqunrs lnch su the ne! area baaed
oa lablo l,Io. 24-f,, Scectsn 2303 and unlnspeeeed
a88oary. BXgttgr abaat otresaeo sbould be basod on
bcrleootal |:otofotceDont acttBg as rtlrrups in re-
clating cll chear. tlur.(FWBl and Efunllar slre , ,,,,.1.'teloforeo@nt earsot ba uoed for thte purpooe.
l'hc oaJor cluago ln verclcal oboar-rosisttng ele-
uents bstmea tho f,lrst and iecond levela regulro
a detallsd nualyclc to de8orql,ae whotbsr soeondfloor dlaphuagn €o$nsatLonc io $allg ere adeqrratefot thg redf.sBrlbutlon of lateral forcee betrveeosalls. Tb,s redlecrlbstlon osgurBes a Brructural coo-
sroto flll tn cooJunctLon v{th the rteel deck. lf
a nonstrsqtrrral tlll la uood, a trlbutar? dlaphtaggl
aaalyole olnllar to wood le requlred whlch would
oe8aee any redleerlbutlqn of ohear st the secondle'uel. tho ac:ual ranponoo of a nonscructural ftll
oa stssl decklng sould be ocmewbore botwsen the tlro
'J)
rsii
Itslta.
.61 Ovcrturnlng foroel obould bc properly conaldered on
all rhsar walle. Whlto thera nlght oot be upllft'
artal ompreual,vc atroogoc tl1ll eloo result End
lhould be cmblncd ulth aniat ctreoa€a rcaultlng
froo dead ead llve loede lncluding snc'!, loade. I.toltt
and foundotl,oo goXl prcEouros rhould bs ebscked.
, 7); Oelag DsBgu. F/2 ac an eraoplo, the pr€cart eolrur
eonnot bs uncd to realEt worturnlng forces !.n thesall becauco there tl no neeao of tranaferr!.ng the
torce acrose Ebs cold Jolnt ylth a cortluuoua key,
lf thr loglc le uEod that tho. eoanectlon lc rmncccosary
sfuc,s thc colrgro gontaln tho sall and prevent lt frourrcartuheetlngrrp tho colrono $urt then be J.letif {ed for
f,lo*ural atresost tu rce!.etlng thlo force.
o
)
.5.
7. Plans.
(a); Relcnenec Gsatral Note {A - Sto,ne cggragate concrote" shorld ba clerlflcd or to morlus aggrogata r$o, 6to.
Bofersloe lo osdc !o U.B.C. Srsnderd No. 24-24-7O
(AS[!l C404) robsro aa:rtroun is linlrea ro one-half lncb.
Slevo analysfu ta alao roqtl.red.
,.(b), DsBslla and scetlons whore dl.aphnlgn eonuacriona re-' qulre olarlflcarlou Der Csss€Err 4 (b) f) and Z) are
ao follws:
1) Dstaur A to D or ghG6r A.
2, tbtsllr E ond t on Sbser 33.
i 3) Detalls D1 E and G en gheet SA.
4) t atatl n/t.
(O gsfarenae'E/i and VS - Betalnlag wall deqlgn ahould bafuraltbsd asd rho{rld oostder hydroatattc pioosurer-untcrl
back sall dralnago lc provldad. Also aee Colmont(l (a)...\ i
'(9) Rofetooso e/3 and ii 3 - .furtfflcarl.on ls regu{red for' , -----i''aaelrraga ln roferenc€ to geetlfir 2313. ..<'
r(e) Rslcrcnes Dototls cl3, Dl3, E/4 ond J Eo H4. Jusrlflcr.clou & requtrad m hoy praedat faaclas srrd cmnectlqarr€ofut rftd loadc, boCh lnraaed and outwErd. Uclng gecrloo
D/3 ac ono onanpler unlese the panel le capatrle oi epannlng
24 fcst horbontally betlroon porpeodlculer walla, lB Errttcaqtllsv€r froor the floor dcck, Connoctiern, es a cautl-
lerver, sould thoa rcqulro JurttftcstLoo for mcarEnt a,ud
ehaar.
(l)r Retoranoc Datelle D and E/4 . Clarlfloation k ncedsd orho oontinutty of rrortloal rall relnf,orceseat te Datntalngdat otool bomr.
Befefencs Dt6tl 8/t - Clarttloatlon of vcrttcal woll rc-tnforoeosnt agrmoctlqr to tho 6te€l bean le neaded.
ri
^"
1i i"i'if..l :r'
,i.ri,,., ,
.'i
:
I lfl'
'ltl, - -'
,,i.).,.,
.fl ,
-r'
j-<-6.
Bgfcrense Detall C/5 - Coonsatlon 3o concreto requlrs'
Juattfleatlon by TEble No. 26'I.
Belcrsocs 9tb end 6th levEl frantug plane - Wall qr
Llac 91 5th lawll and Cr 6eh leval ehould be Juettfl,cil,
for laieral auPport at openlngt. Saso lg true for seeol
bssnt €aet of tbege openlnga for copreeoton flangc enp-
PoaG.
All date la belng held pending further trnstrustlonc froro you. If
lnatnrottoa8 aro not tocelved, deta wlll bs retumod ln 9O riaya ln
csaforaaoce sl.tb gecclon 3OZ (b).
tlcase f,esl lreo !o Gootact ur i.f therc are eny guesgloot.
Youfe v8ry truLyt
I}TTERIATTONAL COI|trERENCE
OF BUII,DINO OF'FICIAI"9
T.lK:hb
t. J. Koyaroateu
Cbtef, Plan Check Englnoar
((,i)
(r)
:i! .
i. I
.tl ;
'lh
lll ",t .-
'.,:,rl.
'1
"
j
ll:1
t
i ,
:{,,
Ilri ,
Hr;; I
o ^r E...6-.:. ) e i-{r.r,
!rern 7,( h).
C llce4! caNNccr?o^/ c,F freet 6€a7,i
f1 ccanplNc Ta st€aa. . FateTt'a, rd€cr,/
AoeA CIN-,EtfroTlyc, To Qtu, = /4(1eb n(t)
Q: t3, f4
(1 € trtr,ttAn, " Yv' 0{7/*
,tVw= r3,r(t.f?)s t.1,;tt(P'o'Er
f^+ 3 : 4 o F t'
y''^- = o.7
A._ . at,).I
---- = /,o,b tL
$, ?rha\(o,l)/
A crvA L t?.er^.,F. :s(t+ o, za-z)(o,e\.l,r? 3 *'
ao Ccta,
Q eacno^t .d, 7?t f ? Ct a\ (0, / 5 Z) f + ( L', (,'/st)( u i/1,
Atc.o,r. llu =!'"=? (at,t>= 2c.,7<
t^, 1%overz=:S':'' - 2,4'A
e0,1
WHEELING }","ORM / ROOF SLABS
WIILDII.IG PATTITITNS
sFlNs UP lo 4'-6' O.C
Welding paftern No, l.- tor spans up to 4'6'
wEl.o tN torToM otftult r ctfrftt oF sHE6t
wE(o tN BottoM oFttult Al 5r0t t PS
Welding pattern No. 2 - lor spans over 4'6"
ipexsovtr r,.c. r,,X€,lJirt""iJr"$rt*,
ryELp PATTERNS, LOCATTONS AND SpACTNGTensilfornr requircs /s round or etluivaicnl weltls, spaced
15" on center on all supports to providc <liaphragm designfor base sheet. 1,'or standard wt:lding pattcrni wjthout
diaphragm base see specifications. IJor data and all ultimatc
shear stretrgth values covering I'ensilforrn, plus lightweight
fill, refer to Wheeling Corrr.rgating Co. sales rcpreientative.
DIAPHRAGM DESIGI$*'I.*
K,/7::{---/,-/
__-.-lr. .;p/ cacurci-\ '/' TartERN No. I
ArPtox.30' o.c.
ArProx.30, o,c.
wEro tN ooTToM ofttuta aT StoE t Ps
SHttIS Al tHO l^PS ,i/
ERtGflOH
PATTIRN NO. 2
I
E
3',0' 3'6" 1.0' 4'6' 5'0' 5'6' 6'0. 6'6' 7'O' 7'6. 8'f"l. span teet
I
r -l:1ln':n".r.,0."r.:rlues ar; fequired, contact Wheeting Co.rogating Company.
"'.lhe.shear strenglh vajues sho$n !re lor bare sheels. Strenflth ol form ard h ara,varl.bl?upro I/rJU tDs. port00t trrdelarled Intotmal.on torta(t yoLa lvf€?trngSrles RCpresentaliv, olnearest lvheeling olfi ce
fo delermine tho Ulhmate Shear Str€ngth, locate lhe slan in leet at tho bottom ot thc ch ,t.
It9l€cr a lne.upward trom thc span lo-lne desired gage Then draw a l,nc lroft tho gage to rrre|l margrn w-nere lne Uttrrnale Shear StrenBth is Indicaled. (See page ?, ',oiephrae-m-O6sit ,
lor melhod of calculalrng salely lacto,.)
FIRE RESISTIVE RATINGS FOR FLOOITAND ROOI'SLAB FORMS
\
i
I
Wire Vent CIip lor
TF.I25 #3?22
Z " vcrmiculite plaster
%' vermiculate plaste
,/s " acouslical lile
,;" accustical lile
None
i'{ " peflite plaster
aggregate
7!'perlite plaster
aggregate
l'acoustical lay-in
panels
.#3E40 tor 4"
1i3845 lat 4Y1 '
#3850 tor i"
wrro ulducr r.u
sHtflS AT tND IAPS
"he foliowing patterns are recommended for Wheeling' 'ensilform when used with Reinforced Concrete Slabs.Placement--Place'lensilform sheets end-to-end begin-
r ing at corner trf buildir-rg, rnaintaining alignment. When
c ne row is placecl cnd-to-erd, bcgin another, nrakfirg align-r.tcnt adjustments if neccssary. Place sheets with eJges upand end lappe<l to a minimurn of 2 inches for weklei
< onstruction or top clrord width for clin a112a1r-"rl1.
Oenter end laps ovcr suplrrts and make side lap one-half
< omrgation.
Welding -- Weld sheets to supJrorting steel immediatelyafter alignrnent, Gusts of wind mav displace sheets and
endanger workmen lrclow. All sheets must be welded beforeend of working day. tsroken bundles must be tied or
r reighted down to prevent wind blowing sheets-
D.esign Basis - Using welding patterns 1 and 2, the
oesigners may design on a continuing slab basis. Under
these conditions ACI and lhe Urriform Buildins Codeallow liL2 ncgative momcnts (spans 10,0,, or ldss) forthree or more sl)ans uniforrnly loaded. For other desiernconditions tlrr: designer should determine the applicalile
code coefficient and refer to Note I (c) (d) 1ei bf SUfTable 3 for conversirrn of load values to comDensate forvariation in nro rr rcr rts.
Sqf -tnpp.ing Screu,s Wireeling Tensilform may also beerected uslng scll-tal,ping s{.r{rws.
COMPLETF] LINII OF ACCES,SORIES
/*J
w
#3825 tat zri"
#3830 for 3"
i3835lo( 3/2"
High Chair Washers
U.L. Design
#11
u.L. Design
#53
U.L. Design
fl22?
U.L. Design
lltl
ZYz' sand, grauel,
concrele - l:2.8:4 mix
2%' sand, grauel,
concrete - 1 :2% :3% mix
3" sand, lmestone,
concrete - I :2ii :3i4 mix
2" sand, gravel,
coocrete - I:3.1 mix
U.L. Design
#RC.t
U.L. Design
#RC.ll
U.L. Design
#RC.2
U.L. Desien
#RC-6
3euir', Vermiculite
c0ncrcle
2% " Class A, B or C
built-up roof covering
3%'Class A, B or C
built-up roof covering
2'Class A, B or C
built-up rool overing
Rool 0nly
lasl tv/o drSits indicale depth ol slab. EramDle 25 -2.5"
lr
International of Building Off icialsLOn terence
5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD . WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601 l2't 3) 699-0541
November L0, L972
OFFICERS
PRES ID E N'
EUGENE B, PESTER
DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY O€VELOPMENT
POMONA. (]ALIFORNIA
FIRST VICE.PRESIOEN T
NEWELL POCK
CH IEF BIJI LOING INSPEC-TOR
YA KIMA. WASII I NGTON
sECOND V]C€-PRESIDEN I
JACK O. WH ITE
BUILOING COOE ENGINE€R
KANSAS C ITY, M ISSOU R I
.fREASURER
VINCENT R. BUSH
SUPERINTENDENT OF BU ILOI NGVERNON CALIFORN IA
JUNIOR PAST PRESIOEN TPERRY C TYREE
REGIONAL BU ILO N6 OFFICIAL
COLORADO SPRINGS. COLORAOO
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORT. H, CARTER
5360 S WORI(MAN M]!L RO
WH ITTI ER. CALIFORNIA
MANAG ING OIRECTOR
JAMES E. B IHR
5360 S. WORKMAN M ILL RD.
WH ITTI ER. CALIFORNIA
OIRECTORS
GAYLORD C. DOWD
D IRECIOR OF INSPECIIONS
XALAMAZOO. M ICH ICAN
OONALD A. ERICKSON
DIRECTOF'
OEPARTMENi OF INSPECIIONS
M IN NEAPOLIS. MI NNESOTA
BILL P. HORN
CHIEF BU II-O' NG INSPECTOR
PIERCE COUNTY
TACOMA. WASH INGTON
ROBERT B. FELONER
SIPERINTENDENT OF
CENTRAL INSP€CTION
W ICH ITA. KAN5AS
CHARLES R. HINKLEY
CHIEF BU ILD ING INSFECTOR
MOUNTAIN Vt EW. CALIFORN IA
VICTOR L. TAUGHER
BU ILD ING OFF ICIAL
COIJNIY OF ALAMEDA
HAYWARO, CALIFORNIA
VI NCENT R, BUSH
Si]Pf RINTENOENT OF BI,ILDING
VERNON, CAI.I FORNI A
OICK T. JORDAN
O IRECTOR
BUILDING OEPARTMENT
AUSTIN.'fEXAS
FLOYO G. MCLELLAN, JR.
OIRECTOR OF BU ILO NG
ANO SAFETY
COUNTY OF OFANGE
SANTA ANA CAL]FORNIA
OFFICES OF THE
EXECUAIVE DIFECTgR
T. H. CANTER
MANA6I NG OIRECTOR
JAMES E. EIHR
IECHNICAL DIFECTOFI
O. R. WAYSON
Plan Check No. 8552
Project: Vail 21
Jerry Aldrich
Building Official
City of Vail
Box I-00
Vai1, CoLorado 81657
Dear Mr. Aldrich:
We ate returning all data to you under separate cover
on Ehe above project ln accordance with our letter of
August 9, 1972.
Please feel free to contact this office if we can be
of further ass istance.
Yours very truly,
INTERNATIONAL C OI.IFERENCE
TJK: hb
tsu
Plan Check Engineer
o
t-..
6hr-^-**--, i'rc. -.,-n,r,i" -,ri*.-*- tJ ",
May 22, 7972
Ms. Diana WygantBuilding Departnent
Town of VailVail, Colorado 81657
Dear Diana:
This letter is for
cussed at a neeting on
Chuck Rosenquist, Larryin attendance.
the purpose of reviewing natters dis-ApriI 27, L972 in which Robert Laziet,
Robinson, Ed Struble and nyself were
The subject of the discussion was the time table requiredfor constructi.on to commence on the joint-use parking structure
which is intended to accommodate the parking denands of build-ings completed, under construc'; ion or scheduled to conmencethis sunner on portions of Block 1, Lot 3, Vail/LionsHead FirstFiling. These buildings are known as "LionsHead Arcade Build-ing", under the ownership of Bob Lazier; nVail 21" building,
under the ownership of Charles Rosenquist; and "The Lift House"building, under the ownership of Bob Lazier.
Robert H. Nott represented the position of Vail Associatesthat in accordance with those understandings set forth in the
contracts nade with the building owners, construction of thejoint-use parking structure was to be cornmenced during the
summer of 1972. Furthermore, Robert H. Nott stated that Vail
Associates would not support any variance application on thepart of Lazier and Rosenquist to defer construction of thisstructure until a later building season.
Yours very truly,
vArL ASSoCTATES, INC.
Robert H. Nott
Vice President - Real Estate
F"
l'
F
Tt
*
I
i
i
/jn
AREA CODE 303 476-5601 BOX 7. VAtL. COLORADO 41657
telephone 303 - 922-8238
eraocI
Q,eou$iesrine.1390 west evans ave. -denver. colorado 80223
November 6, 1972
F.ce: VAru 2'
Mr. Jerry Aldrich
Box .l00
Vail, Co]orado 81657
Reference: Ce'if ing Grid at
Vail '21' Project
Dear Mr. Aldrich:
Thank you for your call last Thursday regarding the UL c'lassification
on Donn Products DU-424 cross tees. As I indicated at that time' we
received improperly labeled packages from the manufacturer.
I have ta'lked again with Donn Products and confirm that the DU-424
cross tee is identical in every respect to their DVL-424 cross tee which
bears the identica'l UL label as the DVL-24 main tee. The attached brochure,
pages 6 and 9, indicates equal dimensions, load strengths, etc. Both tees
are made of .0.| 5" cold rolled, electro-zinc coated, steel .
As you are aware, the only functiona'l difference between fire-rated
and standard grid involves the main runners having fire expansion cuts.
There is no difference in the cross runners.
I hope this letter will clarify the matter. Again, I apologize for
the confusion caused by th'is labeling error.
Vice President and
General Manager
JRB:mf
Attachment
ames R. Blair
ecoustical ceilings - integrated ceiling systenxs - dryuall partitions
/
'fi6rvru fir-Varu
l N t PEc ft oxr i; r<E'auEtT
F t''*
/o= Na.rwe \/r u i r[2aar
Ti-= (66s-rrzea lrr 45 745,a py1 C.a.uue.ra-
6u,rr,rru
D FoolNc-
n Fourua+1ton
D FFAMINa
D FlNn u
E P.ot<n^u
Locnltor.t:
C orere
Req. €a1,nrc---
tr 1v+ey<o.x
D Veneer<
D Koor
En Zr.1'^.
Loc,<1roxr:
{?-LJv1g,ir".tG
lJ t<ou6{+
U ?TarNvPt?€ vae-
I_J FTNAL
E Tarzyrt>u
LOcaltonl:.
MEct lantrcAL
flr/eu1,.,qront
! L{eo.1r*rc-
D Hooa+
I
E7o,r<1iat-
Localrorrt'.
! oluere
@I=:)Tue
El Aa1'a"- Localonr
Vs rzv For+ 3-r,t1?E<\-\oN-
VEV THU€ Frcr ../ / '^,,. Au T7m
Covrvenl+.
D A"?Rove?{n+a?vr?ovE?
,\ la
W< e li.'l+t 'E{T
'.\|
Co""a.loNt
€,+-e
Ft'* or-
lN tPEcrloN r<rouErT
Paar
T*= (66Errz=e-AM pF.C.a.sue.re-
t\/dog NA)v1E \:,/.t. : 4'
6u,ro,nra
D Frolntc-
tr Fouuaaltor.r
tr FtravrHc-
M ftr.ln r-[ P,, r\\ .'/
E Atcpou
Locnltotrt:
Co*r==
Req l?a:1,nrc--
n fneey<orx
tI VeHeEn
tr Koor
El Z^=1'o.
Loc,+1ron r:
?ruMglNc-
U 2la.nverer tvac
p Frr-.ra.r (p,,_r\
l]
E ?ar<1ta,-
LOcaltor=t:.
MEcuaxrc^ L
I Ve*r1.a1ronr
D Hea.1rr..r c-
f Hoor+
n
BVo,,r<1ian-
Localrost:
v
TUE
! o'per<
5'r'
Mont
Covrrre*1-.
THUK Fr<r
El /^r<1,,o,r. Locaaront
Vea.rz v Fot<- 3- xt +?E aTl-eN-
./=1fEjF-..
\-----"
a ?t+A?t'r?ov e ? xu* r;4 F"s{,T/\
7a-=
THE TAG ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
820 sixteenth street suite 31O
denver, colonado 8O2O2
(3O3) 534-6905
1 December 1972
llrs. Diane Toughill
Vail Building Department
Towr of Vail
Vail , Col-orado 81657
RE: VAIL 21 CONDOI{lNfUl.l
Dear Diane:
This letter is to verify our telephone conversation of this morning
re: Vail Varj-ance Board provisions for lofts pertaining to the
subject job. It is our understanding that:
1. a smoke-heat detector and alarm system is required
for each 1oft.
2. a second exit to the roof or sprinkler system is to
be provided for each loft,
3. that the exit system (doors to roof-balconies de-
signed j.nto each loft are acceptable) ... that this
system would be used in lieu of a sprink fer system.
Thank you Diane,
Si.ncerelv.
L .',r-
^ Du^ )'.' 0 '*n^\v -/ t"\Y'nr ,'"'C lr'v\
TAGlkw
cc: Mr. Charles Rosenquist
rf'A t1WIw*,-
Theodor A. Grossman, Jr.
tt"7 \
BUILDING PE T APP ON
Ju risdiction
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE - INSPECTOR
WHEN PEOPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACEI THIS IS YOUR
PERMIT VALIDATION
PINK _ APPLICANT
?*n.e-Qat-o*Rslrr t Br.le.L i o NSHEgD
tT-.l!EE ArracH ED gHEEr)
$r. Jnr -+Vni.- Al
ZIP FXONE
VA ILI ADDiESS PHON E LICENSE NO.
AiCHJTECT OR OESIGNER
.?FFr!c- 'Kt-tcttclrl DcSr@rlgQ,- M^,LaroREss b*
MAIL AOORESS BRANCH
AUILDING
Ctas of work: Xruew D ADDITTON D ALTERATION D REPAIR tr MOVE N REMOVE
10 Change ol use from
Change of use to
PERMIT FEE11 Valuarion ol work: $ /- a lt A o o
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Slze ot 8ldg.
(Total) Sq. Ft.
APPROvEO fOF ISSUANCE BYI
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:No. of
Owelling Unltr
OTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE FEOUIRED FOR ELEC'RICAL, PLUMB-
ING, HEATtNG, VENTILAT.}Nh oF AIR cONDITIOXING,
THIS PEBMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZEO IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANOONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 12O DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCE D.
RUcrloN "rl .y "FYgi
HEALTH OEPT.
SOIL REPORT
OTHER (Spoclfy)
CANARY - AUDIT LDENAOD _ TEMP. F ILE
/6/7 I
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Jurisdiction
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
1[sre errec r:o sxeet). LECAL
I oE3Ci.
ztP PxOt{E
MAIL ADDRESS PI{ON E LICENSE NO.
AiCH ]TEC'T OR OE5I6NEF MAIL ADORESS FHON E LICEI{5E NO.
ENGITIEER MAIL AODRESS PHON E LICENSE NO.
MAIL AODRES S EiANCH
U5E OF BUILDING
8 Class o{ worK: dNCW tr ADDITION ! ALTERATION D REPAIR tr MOVE tr REMOVE
10 Change ol use trom
PERMTT FEE JZ .a al1 Valuation of work: #t2 o)
PLAN CHECK FEE '.J'
SPECIAL CONDITIONST
Slze of Bldg.
(Total) Sq. Ft.
Fire Sprlnklers
Required !ye5 !l1q
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:
OTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE\EEOUI RED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB.
ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OH AIR CONOITIONING.
THIS PERMIT EECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK ISSUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 12O OAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WOBK IS COM.
MENCED,I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REAO ANO EXAMINEO THISAPPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE ANO CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THISTYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEDHEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT OOES NOTPRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
SICNAIURE OF CONTRAC TO
F I RE OEPT.
Y VALIDATED IIN THIS SPACEI THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE - I NSPECTOR
M.O.PERMIT VALIDATION cK.q3f ud
CANARY - AUDIT PIN K _ APPLICANT GOLDEN ROD - TEMP. FI LE
Best
copy
Available
t507|,--I
BUILDING PERIVIIT APPLICATION
Jurisdiction o
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
Trie- QeueEtJL €7crF-E- - VrytL- Zl fuDq Lror.JSNtZ.A>
q[stt ttrtcxto sxeerl
I oEsci,
,"*""Lar(5 i{oak_. "^'E'H?zs /A, -''"
PHONE
41/.^=zztt
3 < a.ve-
LrcEx3E t{o.
AiCHITEC' OR OESIONER MAI L ADDiES 5 PXONE !ICEN9E NO.
MAt L AODi EsS ''XONE
MAI L ADOiESS
'RANCH
USE OF 6UILOIN6
8 Ctassof work: D NEW E{OOtrtOl trntrennrtoH tr REPAIR D MOVE D REliloVE
9 oescribe work, ,4T)D1 l tflJ eE
-{ ={+e-ut.tlto<" Z<r L{I.ALLS
l0 Change of use lrom
Change of use to
1 1 Vaf ustion o{ work: $ A <- oOt-> -
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Slze of Bldg,
(Total) Sq. Ft.
aPPLICATION ACC€PT€D 8Yl APPROVED
'OF
ISSUANCE BY;
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:
NOTICE
TE PERMITS ANq REOUIBEO FOR ELECYRICAL, PLUMB.
ING, HEATING, VENTILAqNG OR AIR CONDITIONING.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOIO IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 OAYS, OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WOBK ISSUSPENOED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 12O OAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
MENCED.
SOIL REPORT
AIUiE OF
WHEN PROPEBLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PLAN CHECK VALIDATIOh
WHITE - INSPECTOF
PERMIT VALIDATION
CANARY - AUDIT PIN K - APPLICANT GOLOENROD - TEMP. FI LE
o
Drct$or l l, l97t
,:!:.'.{for tir 3r.ry grt Gol ffuru""'.:'Ing lr irrrrby rpFfgvrd forloerfrt.ln faF.by rpFlrv.d for tir 3r?br.'Yrll !l'but tdtng ta Va Vrlrll , Golorldo.
Illl^rAot lr tocrtrd In Comcrctrl, il roar i::::"L:tl?!:__ tf you-havr fuilirr er.frtont. ,,e,su t, ...eu.: ry .yeu naya ?ui?Dar efaftlontr llrrta. con_
,. t'i'' Yourr tittyr, '.
zon I ag-irriiiii
dt
PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION
Juridiction of
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
/e at $,a-s:
1[lel rrrecrto sxe:r;
I DE3C i.
MAI L ADOhfSS PIION!LICENSE NO.e?,
AiCHIYECY OF DESI6NER MAI I ADOiESS PHONE LICENSE NO.L,
ENGINEER LICENSE NO.
MAIL AOOIE!;S JRANCI{
USE OF BUILDING
I Ctas of work: D NEW n AoDlTloN AALTERATIoN n REPAIR
Typ. ot Fixtur. o. ltrrl
WATER CLOSET ITOILET'SPECIAL CONOITIONS:
LAVATORV (WASH BASIN}
KITCHEN SINK & OISP.
OISHWASHER
LAUNORY TRAYAPPLICATION ACCEPTEO BY:o foF rssuANcE aY
CLOTHES WASHER
WATER HEATER
U R INALOT ICE
THIS PEBMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOIO IF WORK DR CONSTRUC.
T|ON AUTHORTZED rS NO\ 9OMMENCEO WTTHTN\oo OAYS, OR rF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK\.8 SUSPENDE D OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 12O DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTEB WOBK IS COM-
MENCED.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REAO ANO EXAMINEO THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO AE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THISTYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEOHEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOTPRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE
PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATINGCONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
atuRE oa con-taactoi oi auTHoRf:ED GEN
ORINKING FOUNTAIN
FLOOR .SINK OR ORAIN
SLOP SINK
WATER PIPING &
WASTE INTER
VACUUM B
SEPTIC TANK E PIT
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IIN THIS SPACE THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PERMIT VALIDATION
/
WHITE - INSPECTO R CANARY - AUOIT PIN K - APPLICANT
qtqa'
GOLOENBOD - TEMP. FILE
t50G
I
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
ot \/Ar,=Juridiction
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
Ve,'t- ? t
{I ISEE AIIACHED TXEET}
| 0Esci.
zrc FHOta
MAIL ADDiESS PIiOXE LICEN3E NO.
AFCHI'EqT Oi DESICNER MAI L ADDIESS IICENIE NO.
MAI L ADDE E55 PflON'LICENsE IO,
MAt L AOotEsS al^l{cH
U5E OF BU ILOII{G
8 Cras of work: D NElt/ tr AoDlTloN ! llftnerton tr REPAIR tr MoVE fl REMoVE
I0 Change of use from
PERMIT FEEI I Valuotion of work: 0 l. 5oo\
SPECIAL CONOITIONS:
Slze ol 8ldt.
(Total) Sq. Ft.
Flrq Sprlnklort
Roqulred E\/esAPPLICA'ION ACCEPTEO 8Y:
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES:
OTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS AFETEOUIRED FOR E
ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZEO IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF
CONSTSUCTION OR WORK ISSUSPENDED OB ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM.
I HEREAY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REAO AND EXAMINEO
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BETRUEANOCORALL PROVISIONS OF LAN'S ANO OROINANCES GOVERNINGTYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECHEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT OOESPRESUME TO GIVE AUIHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEI
PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULICONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUC
sr6NATuhgOt CONTiAC
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE - INSPECTOR
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS THIS IS YOUR PEBMIT
cAsH PERMIT VALIDATION
CANARY - AUDIT PIN K - APPLICANT GOLDENROD - TEMP. F ILE
t
t a
'L'..-2''
tli{-
10"."
.:,: s
'.r..., .j[', t J
I
I.t
Ina-l
,.. ;.;|'l
/l
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I,tl
--,
fi
I
I
I.. 1
i
Tlll ll
-{
'
t
I
lF:;ri: ' -l; 1
,- iili:",,#li.ril3 ";. , i
Lt
I
,l
1r".r)-. i
\$
.f
. 0*
EgE
i *t!i ,,.
I
I
i
I
i
Ii
I
T
I
I
I
LI
lt:
r-j
-!I
P
{
<r\t.\
\)
tl.
i\
.>
Y
J*
I
J
.a
I
*.
t.
d
.-b -r.o-\\
t
{
a.'6
.D'2
f +-.-.--- --l- _.r -.---r.-.j{
.lI
I{
aqI
J !{
ly2
,f:, 1s
J
a
Fod
- -.- C\- .-,-
a---.-.--70
+-s
tl
\ll-ts
i
<---S-_i>,
t".*,.e
-{
.l\
.i- )
\.-
C, d i/6 7-t
I
I0 tili]l.
r:l's
It
I
i
+--lD
h=1-
3E
I
I
I.l.l
I____J\
*?;
,4t tlenue/
tldoua lu/e t/.
I
I
i
oo
I
I,
!t
fl
>-<1.-
:)
-:tirlA.iJ
^l
.Ut---\
s
atu
l{Jr
fr
:)!
d
v
\A
on
n
)
:}
-F-
v
a!
IJ
{
I
o
\A
I
I
t4af"
1*.trtJq
,u.IJI
...J
r:.r-
es
ts
r-{.U
aci'irl4r
I
I
I
I
'1.
I(\tlr
r)1
\gJ
I
Ii
I
__+
t,n
-:'],
-J, -: I-.: t
tu.....
) -,< i,:
..iJ ^.Lt"- -;
\J
J
a4
'+JtL,
NerJ
.0t
+-
V
\r
IJJ
r})
i^$
\!6rT
$
c)lisohs
\v\{' ! -5t-* \ )\ \
h-os \: I .l\'., : I j aA"ir : q\ r*t'lSil l;:,i
"i e €tt ('i€-t
!
\
J
stt
Ur(
\
tt
)
\
oqo
\
,c[
\
\
\s
AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEl,l BOARD
MAY 6, 1976
f crossroads_Sign variance - Request to use words "shopping center,'' Jeff Nichols
l- Kaleid.oscopq sigl variance - Request to move existing sign from Gold' Peak House to Slifer Bui'lding
3. Malmuth Residence - Lot l, Block 2, Vail Valley First Filing
Ben Strahan
4. Voliter Residence Remodel
Bob Vol iter
Y. Shapiro/Pettee Duplex - Design revisions
Abe Shapiro
,(. Children's Corner - New sign' Carousel I i
. Slevin [,esidence Addition
Jim Slevin
8. Frank Rogers Residence - Lot 7, Block 2, Bighorn Sth Addition
9. Vail 2l - Trash Enclosure
10. Christy Sports - Exterior modifications
Gore R
vgrli REAL ESTATE
P. O. Box 1528
-Vail, Colorado 81657
303/476-2482
Denver Line 623-7110
PBOPERTY MANAGEMENT
P. O. Box 3639
Vail, Colorado 81657
303/476-1350
Denver Line 623-7110
t
64,
{g
c'l
ttu
q.
.5
.t) 'j:
+e
ff
;
L1
rl\
-+
t.
?<
o)
{
-+-
s
I\
C
4
\s
I
,'=l
c=\_+r'
\.4 €
'^s'f r
<xt
a
-+\A ,;'(!
.J
.\
,6 \
'-
!,-+
n.<;qre rJ
-i\\Js
II
litirll
rii;{ i
lilfii
r,
o
I
s\
'\i
\+j
v] |
L
f
'h4u'/ffi
ffi,
ffi-ffi'ffi,
o4:?24
p--f er-z "/
aJ
'"'nl* d-
tL*-<*-z.-L:'
2t
,' 21'7 +t/a.-i.Zt*
'/;r
j;-
, fII b"t y'
rbocarlr-
q"N
q
I
tu
,a(0 .$r
,,?
_9s9a-gg6
7qa
Jae^ -,,t
z (va? - z/tJ
vza
---(. /e-2 Orratzt/
4i'Ir.iii4q 3'itrEd
dnH;E;T?-3:6e=Fl
H il E J FJ ; ;
"
g tr i;€EE
F 5 i?5-xE5u $sgg-*4 :zf <<Y(l
H
B
$
g
H
si
H
tss
Y1
tr
6
ffius
H
ts
Y
H
6l
L]
E
'n
-o<
lLt : o-rzt 52f - joo
d.
d iErlr F<F u-cz E3.:*
d. g<
n 39
r! !=
o*o!
g
.F
t-
J
TL
L"J
d,
a1
+ t)r7rH.: ii^d i*:.il;lOg8"53t;i iEi.= !,1i i,:.:= r:s .
FFIE
an
Ell
P-"tL'
l,;*l(s
S)
$*rFlt&-.r
(J
L-- !rs
F=
nddtr
E{Cltr
EltE
*o-;ot;uqJ vr
1
g' .*.t.'' i
)'.' - .r-i'{' .'i' . :"-",1- ----J
;
ar
.'l
I
EXHIBIT ''A'I
TO R.ECEIPT AND OPTION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN VAIL 21 AND PURCHASER
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
SITE B
A parcel of land lylng in Block 1, Lot 3, Vail/LionsHead, Flrst
Fillng, a subdivision ln tl're Town of Vail, County of Eagle, CoLo-
rado, described as: Commencing at a point at the East end of the
most Southerly line of said Lot 3, thence N 4035'58" W 77.00 feetto che true polnt of beginning; thence continuing N 4035t58fr W
56.00 feerl rhence s 8s!24'o2n'w 50.00 feet; rhence N 4035r58'r t{
67.27 feerl thence N 85024t02t1 E 59.00 feer; thence N 4035'58" w
30.00 feet; rhence N 85024toz',t E 70.18 feet to a point on the Eastline of said Lot 31 Ehence along sald East line, S 10o34t18" E
83.52 feet to a point of curvel thence 23,96 feet along the arc of
a curve to the left whose radius is 59.82 feet and whose central
angle is 22o56t57rtto tlre most Easterly corner of said Lot 3;
thJnce s 85024r02rt w 22.50 feetl then"L s 4o:sr58rr E 47.5o feet;
thence S 85024rO2r' w 72.50 feer to the true point of beginning,
containing L51532. 11 square feet or 0.3566 acres more or less.
Parcel 1
A parcel of land lying in Block 1, Lot 3, Vail/LionsHead, First
Filing, a subdivision in the Town of VaiL, County of Eagle, Colo-
rado, described as: Commencing at a point at^the East end of the
most Southerly line of said Lot 3, thence N 4'35'58" W 77.O0 feet
to the true point of beginningl thence continuing N 4035t58" I^I
56.00 feet; thence S 85024'02rr W 50.00 feetl chence s 4035r58'r E
56.00 feet; thence N 85o24tj2t' E 50.00 feet to the rrue point of
beginning, containing 2,800.00 square feet or 0.0643 acres, moreor less.
ParceL 2
A parcel of l-and lying in Bl-ock 1, Lot 3, VaiL/LionsHead, First
Filing, a subdivision in the Town of Vail, County of Eagle, Colo-
rado, described as: Commencing at a point at fhe EasL end of the
most SoutheJly line of said Lot 3, thence N 4035'58" W 133.00 feet;
thence s 85o24t02'r W 50.00 feec; ihence N 4035158r' W 33.27 feet ro
the true point of_beginning; thence continuing N 4o35r58tr W 34.00
feet; thence S 85024'02t' w 61.50 feet; thence s 4035'58" E 34.00feet; thence N 85o24'02rr E 6f.50 feec to the true point of begin-
nl-ng, containing 21091.00 square feet or 0.0480 acres more or 1ess.
TOGETHER WITH a non-exclusive easement for the right of ingress
and egress over Tract C as more specifically referred to in Para-
graph 2.2.3 of the Protective Covenants of Vail/LionsHead, First
Filing recorded on May 18, 1970, in Book 2L7 atPage 675 in the
records of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado. The
Seller reserves the right to grant other non-exclusive easements
over and across the said Tract C or to dedicate the said Tract Cor any part thereof to the public without the consent of the se-
cond party or his successors in interest or assigns,
all in Eagle County, Colorado.
.,1
CtFcve
*t4!4
--..-..-
--'"--/
L rotsH eao
.-..\.-----_--
'-t-. ';--r-*1_t---**- -t
I
s
i\h,>{t
Nfhrrl,\
^\^\ )i
t N:
\..\t \)
\, Q .]
ssr
i$t-0
$ \,'
i{ t'.
d\J
{N
5
()r
="3.:
E6
'trl:aZ A
*z aiuJ -
o>
<.
()g
t6
a
iNr( ((\!T\ Q\
i'i i, ' iiF|.-|- F
o6c|(]
\ il
;. \ \'4\' \ <\
',';:;i;\booo
;;t:frooooo
z
\\
;
l\\tl('\
It
r{
b\
^'\(
Fltr\tr ii\
6z
@
c)\
u or-J i . roqrJrlo:.D rJi!n
L .!ofaolrt!F ri< - c -{e!
e o.rN r{J:c!o x cr. :l, oraonctaolaJidicf
sO!oz{{oll-.
d>lLl 4 fq6r^a
vp: ..dCi646u.or. 10 rrrio tit6. . a
.tt ! '|q!.d68 q
d o t6 s a lvr:at<1. o tr a t €.Jao o I t r a t.4, I C aJ u-dstao !oot,l
a q rQE o/ a$q-ti I' I " it'? '.1.d s-aa|l o >ae l-l g - j'.." Ii 3:ta1..|.'|I !
o>oar. i 4uiotii(J a* C o O oYa! q t q.c
ct, o baoEid.-r6 oo
tad,.an I dAtI(
xorJ::!Ll
.6!-r!. !q o trt-dHvrN I
H 6 ' ! FA
-it&od't
LO ! u C
d.{o !J!l i3o!!
rr o d: ! o,:<o(J o.{
oq e- o - !N a
- l-r
.l; ll g(oN o-l . !.31*;Sz"i*zt9{
\
\t\
rl\t
s1\l
S,r
la
$
(J
t^
1..
t-(j
--?-{
\.)
!'l
!\
a \ it.\l
fl l..tl !-\t 9e
^ "ll ii
s:1.5 i
,,\:!€ t i
\t .--il'il\.i16 !"\)Ji: r\itt ?'
cr,
gta
loa
i.lar,a
|-a
3-lhoa!atc- os'a li. t-
.g t
cr o
La.
rD i, o
9E a
oe
E9
. zt ( ! on ot : 6 !o Pl e.!.
,{ <t \!!Ol q a, E|. HI +-o.a
o Fl 6 t, F
o Drla ot F!!
\
\i
\
1...{NI\
"l ;\\
t\ ir$
\\ \\\,-\
iri
f.
..' \
t\
.il\-\l \ n$l$t<l r\
^l \\
ill N\|\l ln l\\l t'l 'n\l \'$
-' ''- oo'"'
\
-(\)
-'.J
-F,te...
,.-----Y=-
(\
\___)i1
\\
\\8\ ii\\
\\\\$ \\r\ \| \* |t \t\----- - r-
tN\ I
(,.e. aa
a
!o a 6a 4..3 a
t).. A c*t:.o: o a o
H dr ;z toi F
< !.r ar 3N:Er.. /..J
F(.) .i.d!,a
\E (', ! c] \- o !
<o'.Aroco
6 s .4 cr z o E
:J:. i: O
;'ii-
E C tZ:.. r.
do l. o .. c t g
i .u o c-{E i
c l!dgr6ze.a c t.i o .
O !24 O.-.c.'
c -€€q!N-
er d o; 6of-
c.o t io t
9\'.
olc iro, . 6
.i> 5{ol* ozl.oaq ea(tt,J
(, o - (rd.Jo7 a .. E C - .cl
t-l eNo -l I adr/| o
tr c : - o cl .J o: a!1 O ldra d a 6 o-ort
0 z eo 6I-rro. o 6o!., ia !o6 u!! J . ae r< o .4 c o c
z ico o u..N d t c -
E Cdul .]\ r{ o J': c, ! .ooFl 0- eu c|.'!i{ ru Fo.tt."c
> (). ! ?
rt O e.tz rN r o oz loee Fo doo
ioo.6.ro\uoqore
zoe
. -!3- ooo >rr. o
i -:6c- or.6Nc
! € 4{ j-l o
|J Orrd t r, J o o N
..6d4-e.!!o@!>.rr :!,.-
!rtt ,c r-6o n c ea)d . o o . c
c -L.c6 0 ca,ez:ao
d:t ! oco cr a,
E> 6ig: o.i u .:or r: ! I.o@oiEx4 I 06
to.!, co ct 'J>'-..oa > }- o. .., c , ua: .)i o.ci .9 u e 6eJ eJ .N a
raarte !q6- \oo .tO..1 orlHoo ,-r olzolN,<r6l o o . ozl; o aoh -l- o .: 4 rol c c-c k ar cJ .- o .c€rtoHl or!o r.=o6
c.l d d!|.! 6 (!s vt oHJ 4o6o aJ-Fd a,: a,,lil 3_ul < c e .c cr l5 <oL id!Jll.on c6 uar4l >i d dlar..av
nt-o c ! !F6 r -ti cr'\ c c
<l :: E ! u .. ! i te c ! {cl .i dijrc{-rc !l>e{uo,
Jl !l dr@a47 ta ,:l'o..Jq uq.
s\\
I
1
#it
rlnl