HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 5 BLOCK 5A LOT K GALATYN LODGE FKA GARDEN OF THE GODS 1980-1989 LEGALT'ea r;
Project Application
Project Name:
Project Description:oOi
contact person and rno"" 47(f - O9)-2
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
APPROVAL
'/* ,,
lE - r'/. O /- \+o lul
Summary:YELt"ottJ ccuo,.2- {4> /'AEpt1 u)t t-+-
-1 r
C 1+/-.1-. t 'N,fdtr 4r.rF4 '7" tett 70
lf St L F RESvbh tJ- t,) r t ))
6a.f '( 4 _ y f U4u./ t< t\l /2. '' d\)
64c J:- , tt- BAL-c-o/) Y -'
tr,1
3rt'r**)v.aL.- ;)t:
6ttz' tb r/ )'4i-
Statf Approval f/ uT' I s ,S
74*t6)
r 2'L"U/:''4a 4
Ll, ,,t
.;'l,1i,lr Lit fi
ii -t ,iLt ! aiIi t f o
lili
75 south lrontage road
vail. colorado 81652
(303) 476-7000
i:rne l7, .l983
lnne Nolan
Garden of the Gods Club
P.0. 8ox 2994
Ya il , C0 8]658
Re: Garden of the Gods
Dear Anne:
0n June .l5, 1983, the Design Revjew tsoard denied the Garden of
the Gods repaint as subrnitted. The Board however, did approve
an alternative color scheme, with Ala l4ode being exterior sto
co1or, GR-7 Green on the'interior wall, and ET-B Brown for the
trim.
Sincerely,
/1 /f 7-v'^-
Jlm 5ayre
Town Planner
JS/uu
Garbe n of tlreC'obs Cfub "VilP.O. Bo- 2994.Vcit. Color',ado A1€lS?
dt,;ut* 7, lq'*' 3
To *l*fa*rn eL ltili.
I
1 t te- .3n^r'r&"
fi;u..*J" i'. :,
, U.,' ..i
,. .. II s.r, r-{ ja
I
.."n. *p; I
I
?
It.*'.. i {
i. 'J.tt d t,'' /'. t I
I
,. :' r 1 t
i f" { {.i.
/
€*e,*r" t+'
{3.+tt,t., ,#
tlcr.' ; ,
6"it'
','-?ij- \
1! !' ' /
I t, ;)trr1g,-[r,t'r l'1',+Lat''.r^ F r il r
' .\ t"- i- r e I' tr..i{il .r''
llI /.
| ' iV : I I \
{.; rr"r. r d, r..
o
Jl','. JlLru g..q{,U
3525 LuuL Co""k 91,1. fi gCA
9"ll,.'. Leor^ 75219
February I, I983
Mr. Jim Sayre
Town of Vail
75 South Fr:ontage Road
Vail; Colorado 81657
Dear Ur. Sayre,
In regard to your letter of January 28' 1983' please
be advised that I am surprlsed that you rtere not presented
the plan dated 10-5-82. The bids were so high on the
orlginal plan EhaE the wal1 and terrace had Eo be omltted.
We will definitely be planting the shrubs and the
six-foot spruce (I hope co get an elght or t.en) as soon
as sprlng pernits. Since I do not have thls origlnal plan'
would ic be posslble for you Eo leave a coPy showing the
exact location wi.th Mrs. Anne Nolan at the Garden of the
Gods Club? Ihls will prevent any further errors.
We will be looking forward to your inspcction on
July I, 1983.
S incerely,
IOIH: kl
cc: Mrs. Anne Nolan
Garden of the Gods Club
Vail, Colorado
o
75 soulh tronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
January 28, 1983
l,largaret H il i
3525 Turtle Creek Blvd. #13-BCD
Dal las, Texas 75219
Dear Mrs. Hill:
In the second week of January, 1983 Mr. Frank Payne of Beck &
Associates gave me a revised'landscpaing plan for the Garden of
the Gods. This is the first time I reca'll seeing this plan; the
Design Review Board had approved a more elaborate plan with a wa1l,
a relocated spruce and an iron gate.
The drawing that l''lr. Payne gave me, dated LO/5/82, is now staff
approved with two conditions: that the "shrubs" onthis plan be specified and that one,six foot spruce tree be planted
in the approximate location as the one that is shown in the original
Design Review Board approval . This will help screen the pool aiea
from the street.
A Iancscaping inspection will be scheduled for July 1, 1983.
have any problems in p1 anting this tree, please contact me.
Si ncerel y,
,k"v4v-
Town Planner
J5:df
If you
Profect Applicatlon
()/'
Proiect Name:
Pro,ect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
3l*. .-il[*t 9. .q{il h /
3525 IutL Co*k gl,l" B gCD glv\/
Aolb, guas 75219 ,'
*g*bn
2r
Gra
5'
February I, 1983
Mr. Jln Sayre
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Co1-orado 81657
Dear Mr. Sayre,
In regard to your letter of January 28' 1983, please
be advl-sed that I arn surprlsed that you were not presented
the plan dated 10-5-82. The bids nere so high on the
original pl-an that the wall and terrace had to be omitted.
We w111 definltely be plantlng the shrubs and the
slx-f,oot spruce (I hope to get an eight or ten) as soon
as spring perml-ts. SLnce I do not have thJ.s orlglnal plan,
would i.t be posslble for you to leave a copy showing the
exact locatl-on with Mrs. Anne Nolan at the Garden of the
Gods Club? This w111 prevent any further errors.
lle w111 be looking forward to your inspectlon on
July 1, 1983.
S incerely,
MHH:ki
cc: Mrs. Anne Nolan
Garden of the Gods Club
VaLl, Colorado
11111
I
lrun u UftI
75 soulh lronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
January 28, 1983
Hargaret Hill
3525 Turtle Creek B'lvd. #13-BCD
Da'f 'l as, Texas 752I.9
Dear Mrs. Hill:
In the second week of January, 1983 Mr, Frank Payne of Beck &
Associates gave me a revjsed landscpaing plan for the Garden of
the Gods. This is the first time I recal'l seeing this plan; the
Besign Review Board had approved a more elaborate pl an with a wall,
a relocated spruce and an iron gate.
The drawing that Mr. Payne gave me, dated 10/5/82, is now staff
approved with tlo conditions: that the "shrubs" 9pthis plan be specified and that one,six foot spruce tree be planted
in the approximate location as the one that is shown in the origina'l
Design Revierv Board approval . This will help screen the poo) area
from the street.
A lancscaping inspection will be scheduled for July 1, 1983. If you
have any problems in planting this tree, pl ease contact me.
Si ncerely,
,h"&7-'"-'
Town Planner
JS:df
l--
>J
75 soulh frontage road
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
January 14, '1983
Mr. Jack Lambert
2800 Thanksgiving Tower
Dal1as, Texas 75201
Re: Garden of the Gods agreement
Dear l'lr. Lambert:
P'lease find enclosed the employee housing agreement as amended.
Sorry about the confusion and delay in its execution. Hope we
can now get this fina'l ized. Thanks for your cooperatjon.
Sincerely,
APP: bpr
Encl .
cc: Beck and Assocjates
;. -';ffi;'"/'il
Senior Planner
4.
PEC -4- 9/13/42
Rcnuest f or exterior al tciaiion an(l tir'Jdif ica Lion in CC I I I) istrict f or shcrp
_.rjnsqfrjl-qrr.q j.i9-tr-5-P'..Lt]9lD-fit..rr.:tl"ftt-i!-Ll-.!",ti A-'ipiTAnt:Jtwii sheridarr
Jim Sayre revievred the meeting of July 26 when the app] icant first appeared
with the request, lle explained that sorne of the objections at that nteet'ing.
had been meti--the elevatjon of the cornplete building was now presented and there
has now some variation in the facade.
A1 len Tafoya, of the Ruoff-Wentlorth Architects office, presented the net't drawings
and explaihed that Performance Ski was adding only 2BZ square feet. He added
that he felt that enclosing the area behind Bart and Yeti's with a gate \^ras
an asset, for the gate wouTd hide many items and trash that were stored there,
Trout objected to the tightness of the corner space, and the inability to sec
the buildings beyond the court
Vie'l e moved and l,lorgan seconded to approve the request as presented in the ncmo
dated 9/7/82. The vote was 4-l (Trout agdinst) in favor. The motion passed.
Jint Sayre reminded Tafoya of the parking fee that t'tould be assesed the addition
of square footage at Performance Ski
5.Request for a setback variance in order to const woul d
encroac eet 'into a reou side se ack a
pp l 'rcan ert
Peter Jarnr showed the site plan. Frank Payne of Beck and Associates, contractor
for the appl icant, showed dravlings and photographs of the proposed area' tle
explained that there t'tas already an existing deck over the area proposed to
be'a greenhouse, but that the greenhorrse would extend a little beyond the deck.
He added that the building was substantially belovt in GRFA, and that the new
addition would have little impact on adjoining property ovlners.
Donovan felt that there was no hardship demonstrated and Viele agreed.
Morgan moved and Trout secondcd to approve the request for a setback variance
and cited the reason that there are except'ions or extraordinary circurnstancesor conditions applicable to the site of the variance'that do pot appiy generally
to other properties in the same zone.
The vote bJas 3 jn favor, 1 against (Donovan).and Corcoran abstained.
Ryan pointed out that other buildings lveren't enjoying the sarlte privilege of
Uuiiding in setbacks. Corcoran felt that perhaps there should be broader
crjteria to determ'ine a variance from hardship.
6. Request for amendrnent to the municipal code to disallotv the review of an
a txtfi ca ffi; n dTTenl]l n q a n-d- E n v iio rr nren ta I C orrrirt i s s i on
Tf*tl-e-appt-iciTl'on-is lu-bitanTfiTIy s-irrli-iar-fo-qr'. 11eu-isrye-d *ifh-in -tF-u pI"f:of:
j/eq l-:-*Tpith-' c.d n il- -rown oi-Va il
Peter Jarnar explained that there had been a number of instances where an applicant
had re-app1 ied for sorne type of approval rr'ith the sarrre appl icatjon that had
previously been denied. I'iorgan felt that perhaps one year was too lottg a tinle
franre, that they were dealing with rigir'cs--the public had a right to re-app1y.
Jannr said that the leqal staff had revicr,red the amendutent.
a-qreenhouse tha
October ll, 1982
To: Jim Sayer
Town of Vail Planning & Zoning Staff
Vai l , Colorado
J im:
In regards to your concern about the minor infringements
of the Garden of the Gods Club sidewalk over the Vi]la Valhalla
property lines at the north-east corner of our lot, I wou'ld like
to assure you that the Villa Valhalla Condominium Association is
not concerned about this minor infringement. Basically these
infringements have existed for some time and they present nodifficulties to the owners of the Villa Va'lhalla Condominiums.
Therefore, as President of the Villa Valhalla Condominium
Association, I give my approval for the sidewalk and cribbing in-
fringements as detailed by T'im Clark on October sth, '1 982, on the
improvement survey by Eagle Val 'l ey Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
dated August 23rd, .|982.
Si ncerel y ,
arry Craddock
Pres i dentVilla VaIhal16 Con dominium Association
oo
a\*
\%*
*a
P
f
-t-$+$
v!l
-I
s-t--
*
T
g
-t_
no-{.
-f.
dT
A
\
E-
{\
x
d-I
.c
rU
--JJil
T
\-F
C!/r ttl[
.-O
0
PbP-<
o
fv
'atb
(\
d\a
--{-$+
r. t't$l
T
$
*
T
g
J_
n
o
L.rt)T
\
\J
E_
-l-
r\r
)(il)
Liitil+t
st
J]J I
__J
JIJ
fl-l- |dr
t\
T
{T
{
l-u
t
,9
./s
I
Ill
-{
$sbor
.-<fl
3
d
Jo
€nF
-@'-
il
I o-
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT dated tn.'& a"y of
0**, +-, 1982, by and between rhe TowN oF vArL,
U
COLORADO, hereinafter referred to ae ,'VaLLr,' and A. G. HILL,
hereinafter referred to as "Hill."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, HilI is the owner of the property
described as:
Lot K, Block 5A, Vail Villagerrifth Filing, County of EaglelState of Colorado,
hereinafter referred to as the 'rsubject propertyri and,
$IIIEREAS, Vail has requested that certain
restrictions regarding enployee units be placed on the
Subject Property.
NOt{, THEREFORE, for Ten Dollara ($10.00, and other
good and valuable considerationr the sufflclency of whlch is
hereby acknowledgedr the parties hereto agree as follows:
r. The accommodation unit known ae unrtf ,nffiffi*
the dwelling unit located in the gouthwegt corner of the zh'/a-""+./.'4
rze orfiQ{no",. reetr ":3f q
the improvements located on the Subject property t--t't*
(collectively referred to as the I'Employee UnItB'), ahall
not be sol ., transferred, or conveyed separately from the
other improvements located on the Subject prop,erty.
2. The Employee Unlts ehall not be leaged or
rented for any period of ress than thtr W (KN:f"i andr if
it shall be rented, it shall be rented only to tenants who
are full-time employees in the Upper Eagle Valley. The
Upper Eagle Valley shall be deemed to include the Gore
Valley, Minturn, Red Ciff, GLlman, Eagle-Vail and Avon, and
their surrounding areas. A full-time enployee Le a person
who works an average of thirty (30) hours per week.
II
I
3. The restrlctions contained hereln ehall remain
ln effect until September L, 2002 unless earller terninated
-fooxtpvan' A^tDf+l€ Pbffirv aD{F;€'by mutual consent of the igrte.-
4. Hill, or his heirs or aeaigns, mayr ct-+l'e
diaa:efiqr, move such Employee Units to other locations on
(syaafe"n)
the Subject Property as long as such new employee unlts are4\rwa,Jz I 'substantially the_ t^i{#iFVu."
"tle .old employee vni:cst#aL*al
t' 77., "P/ r/d"/# affi,c/*"^ /)
TOWN OF VArL, COLORADO
Attest 3
STATE OF COLORADO )) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
By
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before
me this day of , 1982, by _,and _, - ,of theffiotonao6-fa-'ifriliTlcTp5T-c offi d onbehalf of said corporation.
My conunission expires:Notary Public
AddresE
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
"Hil1"
f -n r+rsA. G. HTLI
was acknorlcdged before. L982, by A. c. HILL.
ss.
The foregoinq instrument
ne this a-OP day of \u^-^, l_
My comurission expires :
\-
*ffiffiTtr"
2,
s: 74; 442/J4 a uxntd -nzafg u-4-%:FH#z
d --{ttz'zz /
/m
A-'
,!LJ
PRESENT
t{i1l Trout
Diana Donovan
Oan Corcoran
0uane Piper
Jim Viele
l ater:
Jim Morga.n
ABSENT
s?6TFEdwards
lhn Corcoran, chaitman,
PLANN ING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COI.Ti,IISSION
Septeder '13, 1982
STAIF. PRESENJ
Dlck Ryan
Peter Patten
Peter Jarar
ilim Sayre
Betsy Rosolack
c0ulrgrt REP
Ron Todd
called the nceting to order at 3:00 pm.
l Approval of minutes of meeting of August 2-3-' 1982.
Donovan moved and Piper seconded to approve the minutes of August 23. Vote was 5'0'
I ication exterior alteration and rndification in CCI District to encl ose
a a third floor conqomln um at cyrano's.cants:a
Dan Corcoran explained that five letters had been rece'ived from adjoining property
ohners in opposition to the proiect.
Peter Patten gave sone background on the Cyrano's building and reviewed the memo.
Jim Qolombo,architectfor the project made the board familiar with various com-
ponents of ihe request. He adiled that making the Cyrano's building higher . nnde
the building come'closer to the height of the Gold Peak House, He stated that
the app'licait was interested in keeping as much transparency as possible along
Seibert Circle a.nd Hanson Ranch Road.
He showed with transparencjes how the bu'ilding would look when the glass-roof
and ual'l s wer€ in plice. The windows and roof were to work electronicall.y'-and
could be taken off'completely in the surdner. He explained that the third floor
was set back to retain t}e two story feel ing of the building. Colottbo po'inted.
out that only 1 /? of 1 window on thL east side of the Gold Peak House was blocked
by Cyrano's proposal , and that there are 4 or 5 other windows on the same wall
that were already blocked.
Corcoran read a letter'from Rlck Halterrann, lhnaging agent from Arthur Bishop
and Company, ranager fon the Mill Crebk Court Building,'stat'in{i that as long as
the ordinairces of the Town bf Vai'l were adhered to, tne llill Creek Court Building
Association did not have any object ion to the proposal .
-2- el13l82PECo
U
Jack curtin, representing himself and Mrs, cort'landt Hill spoke and nnntioned
;trat;'inii'ti.t itir.'*Ete 2 residences-on the second floor which were changed
to the restauranr aiii lini-oi thi reasons given uas that.residences did not
wi"i"in'ltrat space,
" cu"iin-poinieo-out thit Gyranoi..El not finished landscaping'
inh"tt.t-iirs-iliii piri.Jd oi-ine-easi stde. le added that there rns a sreat- .
possibjliw that tn.'iiJoing'tuitis ano.rooii would become frozen shut and would
remain shut ontne souin'aecti. He asked why a model hadn't-been required to.
be shown in the propoiat, Curtin iiso malirtained that until the view corridor
review was made, there should be no.r"taiittcni of existing vier'is. He felt
that it was djfficuit-to f,ia" the fact ihat there was-a 3rd floor., that-the--
building as it was ni*-iouta-Ue charmint if it r.re.cleaned up, that a 3rd floor
uoutd block 4 or 5 niiiioo*i'ir'rli iii ana-ventiiatea hallravs in the Go'ld Peak '
House. Curtin tef t'iirii.itrere-wouiO Ue incieased tnaffic ,because of tnore people
ln the larger "estarilni iia iaOiiionat ptopie in the condominium, especiallv
if thb condo were rented out. He added lftii it wou1-d- shade the stream considerably'
iu"iln,i-iiit iemar[i-*"re-itrat the app'licint should F asked to finish what
[[L:i'ii.i"'iti"t"a ueiore being grantei' further appronls'
Kit cowperthwaite, representing Jack llhitehead, owner of the Red Lion condominium,
said that it was ltr.-Wtriienead;s presence and icts, after purchasing the.condo'
that disso'lved a law suit between Mrs. iitt anA tn6 fqr of Vai'|. He added
tfat'Mr. l,lhitehead rtooi-to-ioii +O-SO% of his view d-Vajl Mountain with the
addition of a 3rd.6;i;; -CoupertriwaiiJ iiaa iection 18.24.05sA3 qf the code and
fett that jt was not being complied with.
Viele felt that more information was needed. Piper ftlt that the view corridor
should be pursued more, that the previous-items lnatma been approved^shou'ld
66-iirpiitia uerore-griniins_iuitherappro-va'ls. He q't that leaving Cvrano's
at two stories atfowiO-eii.it"nt relief of spaggs.. Pher was concerned that
tfre-aici enctosures";; ;i;iliJ t"ansparent--90% trasparent as u{as presented'
lhnovan felt that the al]ey seemed to be a glgsh-a'tlr that there ms'a definite
i;;;;i iigfrt to tfre-eoiO--peik House,__that there unsanoral obliqation on the
p"rt it 'cv"iano's noi i-o';d'd;h" aia hoor, because uf Hast documented action of
frr.-pirfs, and thai-wiitr togging up,.theri would be J{tle transparency-to,the
;i,irbild-,ieiri, tt'it"ii" iiii"iEncb'in the heishtsor0vrano's and the Gold Peak
House was interestiigr,inJi'no'pioiect of Cyraio's to date. had been completed,,
and that the street ii.ioir"" nitn-tn. 3rd iloor was oerwhelming.. -She added that
a larger restauran; ;;;i$a more deliveries, espec;allx., of perishables.
Corcoran agreed with Jack Curtin in that the preserrbftiOn by'the applicant was
lacking .compared with other appl icants.
columbo pointed out that even with the 3rd story ?.li4i-that there was still
;-iil;t aiiterence
-i" -'tieighi-between
lv1ang' :. "n9 Fg'td_Peak House' that
tnire would be *ore'iciiuiiy generated-in Seibert cidb and Hanson Ranch Road'
gtit-tii"-ippticant-wiJiq'udi..i-io all 5 conditions" ardradded that there had
ievdr-ue"ii'i right to-pririi"-uiewi. He added'thai itras.hard to=see.the view unless
oni weie-in-the-Cfoil Tover area. He explained thatt{le windows would not frost
up-Ueiause they wouid be of l " or l|" ThLrmopane, .adthe.heat from the inside
sfioula-miit-inv sn6w.on-tfii iop-imni'oiatety.' Coiu*osaid that-a mode'l would
--
"-';i:.-i&. '
Pt3- e113l82 i
i
I
\
r
I
3
I;l?
t:rJ
be no problem to make, but that it should have been brought up when the applicant
appl ied for the approval
Jim l,lorgan arrived.
Patten, replying to some of Curtin's remarks, stqleq tfra! lfre staff did not
state that there would not be any impacts. He added that the enclosed decks
rould add to the activii, ln tfre corb arei. ihere had been complications concerning
finishirlq the area to the east of the building, but that there was nofl an agreement
that it must be finished by 0ctober l. . . '
Rvan stated that the request must be dealt with under the current criteria'
iit'ioi"i?6ui"ii"-iio|;';;;i vjouia-travi io ue compteted bv June I ' 1983'
CorcoranmovedandDonovansecondedtodenytherequest,.Corcoranstatingthat
that he.did not t""f-i[ii'-t[ii-present.iid'r *u-i ii'aetaired as others in ccI, and
that he did not r""i i"i"a-iiool ionao wii uppiopriate ]! lhat area when the verv
strong argurnent nur'ri"i'irtii-it aian't"i6"['itreh ttre conversion was'made on the
2nd floor.'I th'ink inii"-i-i"ias alone i"" ti"ong enough for nV motion' and I
reirerate the items il;ildi;'iiitin; -rr'e-voie wis 3-2-(Trout & Piper) to
deny with Morgan abstaining.
view corridor review hadn't been.finishgd, qnd Ryan answered
*is'nol ioniiOent wi'ttr ttre procedure' that it would not
He iAaeo that this nas one oh the subiects to be discussed
on Tuesday, SePtenber 21.
3. Request for variances for G8F4 gll;etbacks in order to construct an additionrJ' iii't".t
Patten explained that the request has been revised since the 'last meeting'.in
that the i"equest now-was for'onlytheairlock on the west side and to expand
the front deck to the south'
.lim trhnning, representing the applicants, showed site plans. Discussion followed
concerning snow removal and storage.
lrlorgan moved and Viele seconded to approve the variance request for the setback
for-the airlock as wel] as the setbatk for the front deck. The vote was 3-3
with morgan, Viele and Trout in favor, and Donovan, Corcoran and Piper voting
against. The motion did not Pass.
Donovan moved and Piper seconded to approve the variance request for the airlock
on'ly as per the stafi recormendation. The vote was 6-0 in favor. The applicant
waireminOea inat he had. 10 days in which to appeal the decision to Town Council.
Piper and Patten left at this point,
Curtin asked whY the
that the legal staff
stand up legallY.
at the Joint meeting
C
-4--9/13/82aPEC
o
4- Reouest for exterior alteration and modification in CCII District for shop
eridan
Jim Sayre revibwed the meeting of July 26 when the app'licant first appeared
with the request. He explained that some of the obiections at that meeting ,
had been med--the elevation of the complete build'ing t*ts now presented and there
was now some variation in the facade.
Allen Tafoya, of the Ruoff-Wentworth Architects office, presented the new drawings
and explaiired that Performance Skj was adding only 282 square feet. He added
that he felt that enclosing the area behind Bart and Yeti's with a gate was
an asset, for the gate would hide many items and trash that were stored there..
Trout objected to the tightness of the corner space, and the inabi'lity to see
the buildings beyond the court.
Viele moved and lrlorgan seconded to approve the request as presented in the memo
dated 9/7/82. The vote was 4-l (Troirt against) in favor. The motion passed.
Jim Sryre reminded Tafoya of the parking fee that would be assesed the addition
of square footage at Performance Ski.
5. Reouest for a setback variance in order to construct a greenhouse that would
of Ehe GodF elub.
Peter Jamar shored the site plan. Frank Payne of Bebk and Associates, contractor
for the applicant, showed drawings and photographs of the proposed area. He
otplained that there was already an existing deck over the area proposed to
be a greenhouse, but that the greenhouse would extend a little beyond the.deck.
He added that the building was substantially be'low in GRFA, and that the new
additlon would have little impact on adjoining property owners.
Donovan felt that there was no hardship dernnstrated and Viele agreed.
llorgan moved and Trout seconded to approve the request for a setback variance
and cited the reason that there are exceptipns or extraordinary circumstancesor conditions applicable to the site of the variance'that do not appiy generally
to other propdrtles 'ih the same zone.
The vote was 3 in favor, I against (Donovan) and Corcoran abstained.
Ryan pointed out that other buildings weren't enjoying the same privilege of
buildlng in setbacks. Corcoran felt that perhaps there should be broader
criteria to detennine a variance from hardship.
6. Request for arendment to the municipal code to disa'l low the review of an
aDDlication bv Desiqn Review Board and Planninq and Environmental Comm'ission
-.'It Ene ajpllcation is suDstantlal ly s]m] lar to one revreweo wlf,nln fne prev'rous
year. Applicant: Town of vail
Peter Jamar explained that there had been a nurber of instances where an applicant
lnd re-applied for some type of approval with the samr application that had
previously been denied. Morgan felt that perhaps one year was too long a time
frame, that they were dealing with rights--the public had a right to re-apply.
Jarnr said that the 'legal staff had reviewed the amendment.
I
PEc -5-or 3/s2
Trcut had the same rcaction the Morgan had concerning the time elenent and suggestedper!1Rs 2 or 3 months. Jannr pointed out that th'is amendment did not prevent
apgl;icants from appealing. Ryan added that this amendment was the resirlt ofdirection from Council. l'lorgan felt that it was overkill. Viele felt that therewere.getting to be too many regulations. Donovan generally was in favor of the
amendment. _She pointed out that the Covered Bridgi building was another example
when.the applicant asked to table his request until the nexl meeting wfien one'of the absent board members would be there, Corcoran added tlrat another exanple
was the pool bubble for the Lodge at vail. viele answered that that was the '
right of the appl icant.
i{organ-moved and Viele seconded not to recomnend the zoning amendment to Town '
counci'|. The vote was 3-2 (corcoran and Donovan against) in favor of not
recorrnending the amendment to the Town Council. -
6, Request
ToF-oilE
for annndrpnts the municir olsDla or ven
code to revise submittal I ations
canE:own of va
until Septerber 27, The
written on ways to
the next neeting.
to
ou
C
Peter-Jamar explained that the Arterial Business District was not included, buttnat it may be at a later date. He added that the crbssed out items were not
needed in the amendment because vending siands were not allowed, kiosks werecovered-i1 thg sign ordinance, and accEssory outdoor dining teriaces were coveredoy-c-ond,itional uses. Awning and windbreaks were addressed in the Urtan Desiqnel!9".Plans; The question ias raised as to penarties imposed upon zoning ioieviolations, and Ron Todd refemed to Section'1g.6G.025.
Ryin explained that this amendment would cut doh'n the time it would take toget apprqval,, It becomes a staff situation. Viele asked about the time e]ement.and Jamar replied that there was not time involved, rather a'location question,
and the permit was issued to the lessee with the 'property owner's apprbval.
The discussion which followed concerned whether or not it was a good idea tohave a new ordinance, whether it was costly'to ask for an improvemnt survey,(it-was decided that most buildings have iirproverent surveyr), wrteirrer-itre-i6nncould rcrely include this information in buiiness licenses.
Jamar suggested that perhaps-the regulations could be included as a part of.anapplication for a business'license 6r license renewal
Ryan suggested tabling this item for further study.
Viele moved and Trout seconded to table the requestvote was 4.0 in favor (l,lorgan had left).
Corcoran asked the merbers to look at the menp Dick had
speed up the meetings and rnke additional suggestions attle suggested meeting a half hour early to diiiuss this.
Corcoran felt that attendance was important at each nrceting and staying untilthe meeting was over was also importint.
..+
Ryan reminded the members of the joint neeting on Tuesday, septenbCr 2l andBetsy asked which menbers courd go to the Nl.,cdOc meetr:rrg-on Oct 15 & 16.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:00.
a
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Septerber .|3,
1982
2:00 pm Site visits
3:00 pm Publ ic Hearing
'l . Approva'l of minutes of neeting of August 23.
2. Application for exterior alteration and modification in CCI Distrlct to
enclose two decks and add a third floor condominium at Cyrano's building.
Appl icants: Bud and Grcta parks
3. Request for variances for GRFA and setbacks in order to construct an addition
on lot 9, Bighorn Terrace. Applicants::, John and Debbie 0dum
4. Request for an arpndment to the municipal code to disallow the review of
qq aPp'lication by Design Review Board and Planning and Environrrcntal Conrnissionif the application is substantial]y similar to oni reviewed within theprevious year. Applicant: Town of Vait
5. Request for_exterior alteration and modlfication in CCII Distriict for shopotpansion along Lion's pride Court on the first floor.Applicant: Steve Sheridan
6. Request.for anendments to the mun'icipal code to revisErsubmjttal'.reguTationsfor outdoor display and outdoor vending. Applicant: Town of Vail -
. 7. Request. for setback variance in order to construct a greenhouse that would
encroach'10 feet into a required side setback at Gardin of the Gods Club.Appllcant: Mrs. Albert c.'Hill
Published in the Vail Trail Septerber 10, I9g2
ts@cR
AND ASSOCIATES INC PO Bcx l4l3 V:il Cobrodo 81658 (303)827-5%0
September 10, 1982
To: Planning & Environmental CommissionFm: Frank PayneRe: Garden of the Gods - Setback Variance
Gentl emen:
In regards to the recommended denial of the Garden of the Gods
variance request, I would'l ike to make one more point before a decision
is rendered. The proposed greenhouse falls directly under an existing
balcony. It is not as though a separate structure is being added to
the building as'indicated by the drawing supplied to you by the Community
Development staff.
To illustrate ny point more clearly I would'like to present the
included photographs and architectural drawings.
Yours
Frank Payne
Beck & Associates, Inc.
fplkm
Encl osures
truly,
Desgrrers/Buirders. Corstruction Mor@ers
o
IGI'IORANDIJM
T0: P'lanning and Environrental Cormission
FR01'l: Oepartment of Cormun'ity Development
DATE: September 3, 1982
SUBTIECT: Request for setback variance in order to construct a greenhouse that
urculd encroach l0 feet into a required side setback at Garden of
the Gods Club.
Applicant: Mrs. Albert G. Hil
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant wishes to construct a greenhouse of approxirately 160 square feet
adJacent to the northwest portion of the Garden of the Gods club. The proposed
addition would encroach l0 feet into a required 20 foot side setback. (See
site plan.) The Garden of the Gods Club is located in the P6lic Accormodation
Zone District. The applicant believes that the variance is "justified in light
sf the fact that other adjacent buildings currently are using space that violates
the setback'limitations far more than our minor variance would allow." (See
attached 'letter. )
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
ew of Criteria and F'indin ion 18.62.060 of the Municipal Code
n
vqliance based upon ng factors:
Consideration of Factors
Thq rglationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential usesqlllstructures in the vicinity.
-
Jh'e proposed greenhouse addition would be located approxirntely 30 feet away
from the nearest structure on the Villa Valhal la site to the west of Garden
of the Gods Club and ten feet from the comron property line between the twobulldings. 'The Villa Valhalla would be the only building affected by the addition.
The
men
ree to which relief from the strict or I iteral
a sDecrfled requla on 1S necessa acnt eve
amonq s'ites n the vicln
rant of s rlv
interpretation enforce-
un ltorTnc
nd
nd
g
a
0ne-of.the development objectives of the Town is to prevent the overcrowdingof land with structures. One of the tools to carry but this objective is the
minimm setback requirement imposed within each zone district. All new development
or additions which'have been cbnstructed since the adoption of the zoning code'
O" of Gods -2- s/3/Bz
in 1973 have had to comply with the setback requirerents or be granted a
variance based on exceptions or circumstances which would nake it difficult
to construct improvements upon the "bui'ldablel portion of the lot. The zoning
code states that structures which were constructed prior to the adoptionof the zoning code that do not conform to setback requirements may be enlarged
provided that the enlargerent fully conforms with setbacks. Garden of the
Gods Club build'ing was constructed in the .|960's and does encroach into several
setbacks on the north, south, and west portions of the property. The factthat the buildilg alrea.{y encroaches into these setbacks.and that _other structures
within the Town are nonconforming in terms of setbacks js not sufficient
neason t0 grant a variance. It should be pointed out that the distance between
the east side of the building and the propbrty line varies frcm 80 feetto 30 fedt.
The eff of the sted variance on and air distribution of
acil ities
No impact.
Such otl'ler fqgtors and criteria as the cormission deems applicable to the
proposed variance,
FINDINGS
The Plannlng and Environnental Commission shall make the following findings
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of specialprivilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classifiedin the same district.
That the granting of the variance wi'l'l not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materia'l 'ly injurious to properties or improvements
in. the vicinity.
'That the variance is warranted for one or mone of the following reasons:
The strlct or 'litera'l interpretation and enforcerent of the specified regulationmuld result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inion-
sistent with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appl jcable
to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties
in the same zone.
The strict or I iteral interpretation and enforrement of the specified
fgulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by tne ownersof other properties in the sane district.
,,o. ,fous) -.,- zt tr')L
STAFF RECOilEMATTONS:
The Departnent of Connrnity Development staff recdmends denial of the
reqnested setba€k variance. The granting of the variance uould constitute
a jrrant of special privilege becaise there are no extraordinary circumstances
or-condjtion! applicable to the site which uould iustify the need to encroach. into the setback.
;,,
o
AND ASSOCIATES, INC PC Bcx l4l3 Wil Cobrodo 81658 (3O3)B2i-57v)
(t
GK
August 16, 1982
Town of Vail
Frank Payne
Planning & Environmental Commission
Proposed greenhouse addition, Garden
Elock 5-A, Vail Village 5th Filing
Gentelmen:
0n behalf of Mrs. Albert G. Hill, we are requesting a variance
to zoning regulation 18.64.050A, regarding enlargement of existing non-
conforming buildings and their required set-backs. The proposed greenhouse
addition on the west side of the building would encroach on the required
set-back line approximately ten feet as indicated on the site plan.
[e are asking for a variance that would a'l low this encroachment
based on the following factors:
. A. The living space provided by the addition is similar to the
use of other adjacent buildings within the vicinity
B. The minor variance being requested grants no special-privilege.It seems that in the interest of achieving comPatibility and
unifomity of treatment, the variance would be iustified inlight of the fact that other adiacent buildings currently are
using space that violates the set-back 'limitations fii more
than our minor variance would allow.
Therefore, because we fee'l that the strict or literal inteiFietation
and enforcement of regulation 18.64.050A would deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same disirict.
We hope that you will see fit to grant the required variance.
Sincerely,
?
Frank Payne
Beck & Associates, Inc.
fplkm
To:
Fm:
Re:of the Gods C'lub, Lot K,
Desgnes/Burlden. CorstrLlctton N/orag€Ys
(o o
' :fr '.tai: r"' '.:9
'.rr l,r.tlr,n C.;tltl..(.,,r p.rt,.r.d l,r.
._- t'rr lr lr r,,i .r
ira. rrrl rh.rl lt lr [,] tr' r'.r atll.d sFrn
rr rrattaa autoat ltr.r,vt'i-,'t lto?!.,
nrai ,rn lha .rb.rv. dc\. I !1,..1 t!.r..t[ ,to ahlr
..r..tt rtllltty cLtntr.,it ,.\,.r. cnt(!alv
cpl Jr rlhrYtr, tlraa ahrr. rrt r|.D arrctoach-
trrrnE t!r orr .tat rdl,,rnlt't frcalrc.r .l-
rtF.ta.nt avldatrla or rttn .'t .r||t rasr!-lla
.acal, .r.aP( aa no3- '
\A
-R
Daanla l;rtaoaaa
C.'lot.do L.S. t't: t
6-Zs:b
DRtve (40')
@RE
. FACJ
2t4
/
'/
//
\\
\
',f l'
i/
)'
CREEI<
.2-'e'cO '(aora.-)
Fo.Jt< ar7aeY37retJ€7a'/'<e
I.
APPLICItTION
This procedure is required
The application will not be
FORI'{ FOlt 1i VARI.l,lrlCl'l
for any project reguesti-ng a Variance.
accepte<l until all information is submitted.
A.
B.
NA}IE OF APPLICANT Mrs- Albprt G- HilI
ADDRESS 3s25 Trutle Creek Blvd. #.|3-BCb. Dallas. Texas PHoNE (2.|4)528-1888
75219
NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Beck & Assocjates. In
ADDRESS Box .l4.l3. Vail, Co. lmNE 827-5960
c.AUTHORI PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE !l*{,[A
ADDRESS 3525 Turtle Creek Blvd. #l 3-BCD, Da'l las, Texas HoNE(2.|4) 528-1888
LOCATION OF PROPOSAI,
ADDRESS 365 Gore Creek Road
/52t9
D.
0.,'/dl
, {''\t*
u'
ol'r.
LEGAL DESCRIPTfON lot block 5-A ri'.i 'l .i n n V. V. 5th
FEE. $I00.00 plus an amount equal to the thcl current first-c1ass
rate for each property owner to be notified hereunder.
A fist of the names of owners of all property adjacent to
subject Property and their addresses.
Vorlaufer Villa Vahalla
postage
the
Lots '14-I8, V. V. 5th Fi 1 i ng
Vorlaufer Condominium Association
Tom Faxon - President
Box 6.12
Vail, Co. 81658
r--/)
I tnnL. '
o ) L 6'Lre-,-
l)o5
l3-., L z 1
Lot J, Block 5-A, V.V.sth Filing
Villa Vahalla Condominium Association
J. Barry Craddock - Presjdent
300 Garden of the Gods Road
Colorado Spri ngs, Co. 80907
-42, ^17 *,/''-
Jr'-:^.Appti-catio"
I.
APPLICATION FORM FOR A VARII.T{CT:
This procedure is required for any project requesting a Variance.
The application will not. be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Mrs- Aln..t e - f i'l 'l
ADDRESS 3525 Trutle Creek Blvd. #13-Bcb. Dallas. Texas PHONE (214)528-1888
75219
B. NAME OF APPLICANTTS REPRESENTATIVE Beck & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS Box 1413. Vail. Co. IIONE
c.AUTHORI PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS 3525 Turtle Creek Blvd. #13-BCD, Da11as, Texas puess( 214) 5zB-1888
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 365 Gore Creek Road
827-5960
D.
E.
r.r('!T -
LEGAI DESCRIPTfON lot block 5-A Filing V'V'5th
FEE. $r00.00 plus an amount equal to the then current first-class postagerate for each property owner to be notified hereunder.
A l-ist of the names of owners of all property adjacent to thesubject property and their addresses.
Vorlaufer Villa Vahalla
Lots l4-18, V.V.5th F'il ing
Vorlaufer Condominium Associati on
Tom Faxon - President
Box 612
Vai1, Co. 81658
Lot J, Block 5-A, V.V.5th Filing
Vil la Vahalla Condominium Association
J. Barry Craddock - President
300 Garden of the Gods Road
Colorado Springs, Co. 80907
-T,oJl - B.U L..z.i.*
B-r 627
t)*:\, C-.
S lCds B
ts@ck
AND ASSCCIATES, INC
August .|6,
1982
To:
Fm:
Re:
PO Bcx l4l3 Veil. Coiorodo 81658 (3O3)827-s%O
Town of Vajl P1 anning & Environmental Commission
Frank Payne
Proposed greenhouse addition, Garden of the Gods Club, Lot K'
Block 5-A, Vail Village 5th Filing
Gentel men:
0n behalf of Mrs. Albert G. Hil1, we are requesting a variance
to zoning regulation 18.64.050A, regarding en1 argement of existing non-
conforming buildings and their required set-backs. The proposed greenhouse
addition on the west side of the building would encroach on the required
set-back line approximate'ly ten feet as indicated on the site p1 an.
lie are asking for a variance that would allow this encroachment.
based on the following factors:
A. The'l iving space provided by the addition is similar to the
use of other adjacent buildings within the vic'inity.
B. The minor variance being requested grants no specia'l privilege.It seems that in the interest of achieving compatibility and
unifonnity of treatment, the variance would be iustified inlight of the fact that other adjacent buildings currently are
using space that violates the set-back limitations far more
than our minor variance would allow.
Therefore, because we feel that the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement of regulation 18.64.050A would deprive the applicant of
privileges enioyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
l,le hope that you will see fit to grant the required variance.
Sincerely,
Frank Payne
Beck & Associates, Inc.
fplkm
Desgrreru/Builders . CorstruCion lVorrogers
ts@Gk
To:
Fm:
Re:
AND ASSOCIATES, INC PO. Box l4l3 Vcit Cdo'odo 81658 (303)827-5950
August 16, 1982
Town of Vail Plannjng & Environmental Commission
Frank Payne
Proposed greenhouse addition, Garden of the Gods Club, Lot K,
Block 5-A, Vail Village 5th Filing
Gen tel men :
0n behalf of Mrs. Albert G. Hil'|, we are requesting a variance
to zoning regulation .|8.64.0504, regarding en'largement of ex'i sting non-
conforming buildings and their requ'i red set-backs. The proposed greenhouse
add'i tjon on the west side of the building would encroach on the required
set-back line approximately ten feet as indicated on the site p'l an.
l,le are asking for a variance that would allow this encroachment
based on the fol'l owing factors:
A. The living space provided by the addition is similar to the
use of other adjacent buildings within the vicinity.
B. The minor variance being requested grants no special privilege.
It seems that in the interest of achieving compatibility and
uniformity of treatment, the variance would be justified in
light of the fact that other adjacent bui'ldings currently are
using space that violates the set-back limitations far more
than our minor variance would allow.
Therefore, because we feel that the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement of regulation .|8.64.0504 wou'ld deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
We hope that you will see fit to grant the required variance.
Sincerely,
Frank Payne
Beck & Associates, Inc.
fplkm
Desgneryelilders. Conslruclion Morngers
AND ASSCCIATES INC PO. Bcx l4l3 Vcit Cdorodo 81658 (3o3)e7-5e5o
August .|6, .|982
To:
Fm:
Re:
Town of Vail Planning & Env'i ronmental Commission
Frank Payne
Proposed greenhouse addition, Garden of the Gods Club, Lot K,
Block 5-A, Vail Village 5th Filing
Gentel men:
0n behalf of Mrs. Albert G. Hjll, we are requesting a variance
to zoning regulation .|8.64.050A, regarding en1 argement of existing non-
conforming buildings and their required set-backs. The proposed greenhouse
addition on the west side of the buildjng wou'ld encroach on the required
set-back line approximately ten feet as indicated on the site pl an.
l,le are asking for a variance that would allow this encroachment.
based on the following factors:
A. The living space provided by the addition is similar to the
use of other adjacent buildings within the vicinity.
B. The minor variance being requested grants no special privilege.It seems that in the interest of achieving compatibjlity and
uniformity of treatment, the variance would be iustified in
light of the fact that other adiacent buildings currently are
using space that violates the set-back limitat'ions far more
than our minor variance would al'l ow.
Therefore, because we feel that the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement of regulation .|8.64.050A would deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
We hope that you will see fit to grant the required variance.
Si ncere'ly,
Frank Payne
Beck & Associates, Inc.
fplkm
Desgrrers/fu ilders . Corstruction lvloragers
O ero|""t Application
Garden of the GodsProject Name:
Dale September 7,1982
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
owner. Actdress and phone: l,lrs. Al bert G. Hi'l 'l . Box 'l 677, Co] orado Spri ngs . Col orado 80901
(303) 636-3766
Architect, Address and Phone:Tim C]ark, Box 14'l3, Vail , Co. 8.|658
(303) 827-5s60
(303) 827-se60
legal Description: Lot K , gtock 5-A , ritlng Vail Vil]aqe 5th , zone -!:4:-
comments: New window to be of same color and manufacturer as origina'l
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Su mmary:
Date:
Town Planner '{"*uApproval
O Rro|""t Application
Garden of the Gods
pr1" September 7..|982
Name:Project
Proiect
Contact
Descriplion:
Person and Phone
(303) 827-5960
Owner, Address and Phone:
(303) 636-3766
Architect, Address and Phone:Tim Clark, Box 1413, Vai'l , Co.81658
(303) 827-5e60
.Legal Description:Lot K Brock 5-A , ririns Vail Villaqe 5th , zone P.A.
window to be of same color and manufacturer as originalcomments: New
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Dale:
Town Planner ,tD'(\" Approvar
E==:==--:- ?
LJ
,\\,-ey;C,...,. vi'.. : ttli;
t
---
lL__1,
,' cii'^
,.lCb- ?
r\t\f-,., G?;*d.a:: 1/
(o' ,/t'
v8a
t'H'o.
i c,t
( Frcli:'e
AND ASSCCIAES iNC PC Box l4l3 V:i, Coorodo 81658 (3O3)82l-596C
August 17, 1982
To: Town of VailAttn: Jim SayerFm: Frank PayneRe: Garden of the Gods Club Remodel
J im:
Attached are the revised plans for the Garden of the Gods CIub
showing the proposed greenhouse addition fa1 ling with'i n the required
set-back lines. Please note that the proposed changes to the east elevationof the building (double doors, patio, privacy walls and landscaping) have
been el iminated.
Also attached is one page of plans show'ing the alternate greenhouse
which encroaches on the set-back.
As we discussed on Monday, August l6th, we would like DRB approvai
Wednesday, August 18th, on the set of plans which show the greenhouse wjth-jn the set-back limits. hle would also like, per your suggestjon, DRB con-
ceptual approval on the alternate plan which would allow us to receive finalstaff design approval subject to receiving a variance from the planning
commission on September l3th, .|982.
Yours truly,
-Frank Payn e
ociates, Inc.
. l.iargaret H i1 1
Beck & Ass
Enc I osurecc: lllrs
fplkm
Designes/Burldes. Co^srucf on N,'loncgers
El evati on
West
North
GARDEN OF THE GODS REMODEL
(PROPOSED EXTERIOR CHANGES)
Descri ption of Exterior Changes
.,-,/- Add new greenhouse area. (Detailing and color of frame-
work to match exjsting entrance greenhouse foyer on east
e1 evati on. )
Add one (l) set of double flush doors for access to trasharea. (Doors to be painted color of existing stucco.)
Add new concrete patio area. /
Add new stone walls on two sides of new patio (stone walls
to match existing walls at swimming pool).
Add new Robert Leper designed railing and gate at poo'l
side of new patio.
Add new rock veneer to existing stucco walls at jacuzzi
area. (Rockwork to match existing walls at swimming pool
Move existing stainvell door at greenhouse to south side
of stai rwel I .
/Detail wall overhang to match adjacent wall. (Stucco to v
match exist'ing in texture and co1 or).
Install new door and sjdelight with beveled glass to match
existing windows. (Door to be color of existing stucco).
Change existing f1 at and sloped roof situation into single
sloping roof line.
Add skylight to new roof area. (Skylight frame-work to be
dark anodized aluminum to match existing windows).
L,'
g^rXu\7
t/
.)
Garden of the Gods Remodel
Proposed Exterior Changes
El eva ti on
East
Page 2
in p1 ace of t/
window frames. )
Description of Exterior Changes
- Add new double doors with full glass lights
existing windows. (Doors to match existing
- Add new concrete patio ur.u. ? -Jl-
- Add new masonry and stucco privacy walls.(Col or and texture
to match existing.)
- Add new landscap'ing adjacent to patio as indicated on site /
p1 an.
- Add new indjrect accent 'l ighting at entry.
I
Date
Project Application
August 3, 'l 982
Project.,Name:Garden of the Gods Reirrodel
Convert exisling rest,iurant to Aparblent, ;nnv:!'t existing storage
rc:m to cnnl oyee ki ichi:n.Projeci Description:
Contact Person and pnone Ssck li lt:sociatns. Inc. 8i7-5908
Owner, Addressand phone: l,'rs- A1f'rtrf C- ti il'l , 8nx 'i677, [nlor,rilo Sprin[rE- Cn]orado 80901
Architect, Address and Phone: Tin C14fli., ll, r'X 111? Vai'l , a{'lof:dO i,.:7-646fl
Legal Description: Lot K. , Btock 5'.{ , Fiting V.V' 5th zone P.A.
commenls: Refe r io attached 'l jst for sun::nry rrf extcrior charrges.
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded
o^t"'ll.tq. 't,/./
oy:
DISAPPROVAL
C)- O
Summary:
t*:,tl,f F}L"J Otkltz F,i L 4ta,0
"--l . "../E statt Approval
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 4765613
department of community development
August 23, 1982
Tim Clark
Box 1413
Vai'l , Col orado 81657 RE: DRB Submittal of 8-18-82
Dear Tim:
0n August 18, 1982, the Design Review Board approved the exterior
alterations to the Garden of the Gods. The full length greenhouse
addjtion on the west received conceptual approval pending Pl anning
Commission approval of the required setback variance. If the Pl anning
Conrnission dobs approve the setback variance you should submit p1 ans
for the greenhouse to the Staff.
Sj ncerely,
1/'i"<"-- *--z_-Sayre ' \
Town P'lanner
JS:df
6ne*1 str (F=s
iM- |*Lh/r,46 p*z-nn: . in ,,4^qw ! +spfr bl/,*
'l84e/4=
7//aar.4zt { k/n-,-/I
/ /.* d,7w
ltro I7t4
f'fL. ' *l*i'- il/- - lr--
Z,t;^^"+ ^.i..,,l,W,+r[f ,*,;/.l./.*:t"^t1 t",*-J--
<-T- r l. I, I 12,{11 S exrsf^. GRtrft---'---J- X'6'l'+ "f-;
o
a.T.4
G AR,D P. O. Box 1677
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901
(303) 632-5541
August 7, l98l
ames R.Kane
Manage r
Dear |4embe r s and Friends:
We are considering a new plan of operat ion for the Garden ofthe Gods Club at Vail. As members of the Garden of the GodsClub or as former guests of our Club at Vail, your react ionand express ion of possible interest in the pian underconsiderat ion would be very helpful to us.
0n October l, 1981 , the Garden of the Gods Club at Vail willbegin accept ing l0 year advance reservations for each individualsuite at Vail, These guaranteed reservat ions will be forspecific /-day weeks and the prices will vary depending onthe suite and the week selected. Costs will-be tased ipontodayr s rates and will be f ixed for the ten year period.
The only additional and variable charges wili be utility andhousekeeping assessments. Financing will be available oncerta in weeks .
We bel ieve there are several advantages to this plan. Fromour standpoint, we will be able to accurately forecast ourrevenue and will be able to commit the capital required torefurbish the lodge and to maintain it at its expected levelof excel lence. The guest wil I have the guaranteed use of someof the most prestigious accommodat ions in Vail for the nextten years at todayts costs.
Please return the enclosed informat ion sheet with your commentsat your conven ience.
Very truly yours,
u r(ar^e--
Gene ra I
Enc .
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMEb{TAL COM}IISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMETIT/JAI4ES A. RUBIN
DATE: 9/4/80
RE: zone change reguest for Garden of the Gods club from public
Accommodation (PA) to High Density Multi-Family (HDI4F)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The- reguest is to convert the Garden of the'Gods cl-ub from a privatecl-ub to a condominiurn project. As part of this request, B Aclonrnoda-tion units would be converted into 4 Dvrelling (condominiun) unitsand the small restaurant facility and two employee sleep:i-ng areason the first floor woulcl be convert-ed in'i:o anotirer Condclrniiriunr Unit.'Tno other employee sJ"eeping areas on the first floor are jntencledto remain in that use.
The history of this matter is that in JuJ.y of 1976, the pJ-anning
commission and the Torur council approved a conclj.tionaf use Requestto convert the Valhalla Lodge into a Private Club. Tha only c*ondit.icriof this approval was th.at the smarl resta.urant facility be I-imitedto a seating capacity of 80 people.
STATISTICS
A.Number of Units
l.
2.
3.q
6!r'
Existing
16 Accommodation Lrnits4 Ernployee sleepingl roomsI Penthouse Uni-t
Sroposed
g dwelJ-ing units
-+-einB+eyee--s.leepin g rooms-F1 L penthouse unit
12 dwelling uniLs
GRFA
I. Existing
12,87! square feet
2" Propgsed
L3r292'square feet
3. Alleweq
1.3r208
"q.r.re feet
r i! h trC iJdrj r
I larT ct) E tJ
.\
.\
.\
B.
'r'iFl
Garden of the God.s - 9/4/80 - page tvtoMemoo
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
The Depaitment of Community Development recommends approvaL of this
reguest with the conclition that 84 square feet of GRFA be removed,
either from an Employee Sleeping Area, or from one of the Dwelling
Units, so that the requested changes would cornpletely comply with
the High Density Multj--Iamily DisLrict requirements.
This request is in fact a Do\^n Zoning in that the Public Accommodations
Zone District has a higher denisty factor (.80) than lliglt Density
Multi-Fami-ly (.60). This request-. r'rould not be considered spot zonr,ng,
because there is abouL an equal amount of HDMF and PA in that area.
HDMF properties include the Row llouses, Vorlaufe.rf All St-'asons, Vail
Trails East and West, and the Texas Townhouses. PA properties include
the Rams=Horn, Tivoli, arrd the Christianja. The Villa" although zoned
PA, is Condominium use and should be zoned HDMF.
The::e is one remaining question, which j-s whether or not the Garden
of the Gods Club shoulcl be considered a l.,odge. If it is determined.
to be a Lodge, when it would have to conply with Ordinitnce I'Ic. 24'
Series of 1980, which retricts Lhe number of days that air o\.Iner can
use his unit, and requires the Lodge to p:-'ovicle the sante senrices
that it presentl.y pr:ovides. Our ::ecomme-nciation is that since it isa Private C1ub, open to membelrs onJ-y, and not open to the generalpublic vra}king off of the street, that it would not be considered
a Lodge.
'rftr
l;1.',1,i
l;;..(:i.lij
Garden ftt'e Gods Cl ub Remodel O
, ,l ltlrl.: l.; il 5.. i;lr, rl .-5:A I Ij.ijjt ' V.V.5th..
i1., ot; ),I'(;il.r.i .-. .cgnygfs.ion -g.f__tqltaurant to apartment.
BEST -;+'
COPY.*truABLE
'Jlrt' fr, l!'. rri,i irrf'orrr:rt iotr i:;
lii-rltrd lrL illr' !l l: j.trlr I ;t1l1ll'ov;r I
Existing & t'lew
A. lilill,l,liii; !'l^'fl;lllALS
Roof
Siding
Oth cr l'Jal I l"lat cr i al s
l'ry-_g{_:.l,
L
t j,_',!!_l_
Cedar Shingles
lt:r;rt iy'r'11 f.'<lr' :;rrlrr,,tt.t:lI lr)' 1lr<: itP|lir':rrtl to tllo l)c:; ilir: ll.r'vjr.'..'
(::)!r lr(' 1; i V trrt :
(,o itlr
Fascia
Soffits
l{indorrs
l\tindow I'rin
Doors
Door l'rint
Hand or Deck Rails
F lues
Flashi.rtgs
Chinneys
Trash Encl osures
Gtccirhorts es
Other'
None
Stucco Light Beige & Tan
l.lood Light Beige
l^lood Light Beige
Gl ass Clear
Anodi zed A]umi num Dark Brown
Woqd w/glassl ights Dark Brown or Beige
l,Jood Dark Brown or Beige
tJood Dark Brown
Metal Light Beige
l4etal L'ight Beige
Stucco Light Beige
Stucco Light Beige
Anodized Aluminum Dark Brown
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
Existing & New
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
Botanical Name Common Name
Aspen
Aspen
Aspen
Blue Spruce
Bl ue Spruce
Bl ue Spruce
Fir
--ium--Per---
Yel 'low Fl oweri ng----mhes-----
Quanti ty
35
z
-Tr-t5
Si ze
l5'
25'
l0'
25'
t0
t0
12'
6'2
20'
SIiRUBS
Junipers(new)4'
,,
6lra)i riifl
c0v[.R5
sa,n roorA.:
SOD
l,li scel I aneous wi I d and domesti c
fl owers.
All areas besides flower gardens, SQUARE FS6TAGE
patios, drainage swales etc. are
currently in sod.
SQUARE FOOTAGESEED TYPE
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
Hose & Sprinkler
TYPE 0R METH0D Miscellaneous rock-lined drainage swales
OF EROSION CONTROL
c. 0,n""/[Ii3rtJlfl" r"utu."s (retaining wails, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify.
- l,li scel I aneous f 'l ower beds.
- I',lative stone retaining wal1s.
- Swinrning pool and patio.
- Sp'lit rail fences.
- Flower boxes.
- Assorted rocks and bou'l ders.
--!rtEo tfztlrz?1*1
6:F-60/25 -@-
c{'a' F/o*
3u" 'l
Z'" /'
/o //
,/afl- ee* ?4 my' * .9a{azn<-
(LLar-t, ffi /7,) z'not = fiofr
ex, " /3 6sL
'trr+ E€v{ 3?7/
/r3
Z-aII
/ss/. {
7s7/.
77ts
/3tL3Z
rr/ = .-Sd{a-c x Z{d u. '- /Z d.a 4Z*r"/
/7 d. u. z Z/ A.u.3 a/h,rr/'@ = za /.u,k ar /o/.u.3/ -+ / /,u.Tda, .
/ lrrt"- d.a a//-*P atd 3?7/rtffi42/4.
do
.
=/
-" - " -' IF-
Vrss{13s/,(
787t,
/ $'aa2
/,4/f
b,12,
/z.n'
623,(c%.f
g-zb
3qU
s70
3qQ
fuc*{o4.{
/
/
.7?.al
.77
.7(
/
/
1zo fuaar-
e .?7
7lfGz{js7,{
//
(
.77
.n
?r+
afs
a7?
,77
.8/
I
I ,7./g
ftarL 2,0.7
fuu
GARDEN OF THE GODS CLUB
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
l. Convert existing service area jnto washer-dryer and mud room.
2. Change existing commercia'l kitchen (106) area into smaller
kitchen and large fu'll bath.
3. Convert existing dining room (102) into living room with
added greenhouse area and patio.
4. Convert existing dining room #2 into master bedroom area with
new french doors and patio.
5. Convert exjstjng mens and ladies restrooms ('126 & .|27) into
one large bath.
6. Enclose te'lephone equipment.
7. Relocate 'laundry chute and doors at lobby area.
8. Instal'l small kjtchen in storage room (113) and add door for
access to studio (109).
GARDEN OF THE GODS CLUB
ZONING EVALUATION
Points to be made:
z.
Cument zoning for the property is Publjc Accommodation District.
The project is essentially be'ing operated as a lodge which is a
pennittiO use under the current zoning ordinance. (.|8.22.010)
3. Accessory eating establishments are also a pevm'i tted use within
the Pub'lic Accommodation District. (18. 22.020)
4. Although an eating establishment is be'ing converted to dwelling
space, both uses are permitted uses within the district. Therefore,
it seems that no variance or special consideration is necessary.
5. In addition to the above'logic the proposed proiect also meets all
of the follovling requirements of a 'lodge:
A. That it have more GRFA devoted to accornmodation units than
it has devoted to dwe'lling units "and in which all such unjts
are operated under a single management providing the occupants
thereof of customary hotel services and facilities". ('18.04.210)
B. That it shall "not exceed twenty-five dwelling units per acre
of buildable site area". ('18.22.090)
C. That it shall not cover more than fifty-five percent of the
total site area. ('18-22.'130)
D. That it shall have adequate parking as per the Parking Re-
quirement Schedule ('18.52..|00). If anything the proposed
changes reduce the number of required parking spaces.
GARDEN OF THE GODS CLUB
(Lot K, Block 5-A,
Zoned: Public
V.V. sth Filing)
Accommodation
GRFA Analysis
Lot area
Allowable GRFA
Exi sting GRFA
Proposed GRFA
Site Coverage Analysis
Allowable site coverage
Existing site coverage
Proposed site coverage
Unit Density Analysis
Al lowable dwell ing units
Exi sti ng dwe'l I i ng uni ts
Proposed dwelling units
Parkjng Analysis
Actual parking spaces
Exi sting required spaces
Proposed required spaces
22,004 sq. ft.
17,603 sq. ft.
I3,340 sq. ft.
15,229 sq. ft.
- 12,102 sq. ft.- 5,736 sq. ft.- 5,781 sq. ft.
.505 ao.es)
80% of 1ot area)
4285 sq. ft. dwe'l I ing )
9055 sq. ft. accomnodation)
6962 sq. ft. dwelling)
8267 sq. ft. accormodation)
-26-26-24
12.62 (.505 acres
l'l't't.5
(15 at building,
55% of 22,004)
x 25 units/acre)
I I across street)
GARDEN OF THE GODS CLUB
GRFA ANALYSIS
LEVEL EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOI.IED
Accom. Units
I 980 sq. ft. 192 sq. ft. Under definition of a2 375r sq. ft. 3751 sq. ft. 1flFfl""[t:;:l;1tl],1!"3 4324 sq. ft. 4324 sq. ft. must exceed the GRFA
4 _0_ -0_ of dwelling units.
Sub Total 9055 sq. ft. 8267 sq. ft.
Dwel'ling units
I -0- 2677 sq. ft. 17,503 sQ; ft. -,., based on 80# of 22'004
' -v- -u- sq. ft. lot size.3 -0- -0-
4 4285 sq. ft. 4285 sq. ft.
Sub Total 4285 sq. ft. 6962 sq. ft.
Total l3r3!9 9q. ft. 15,229 sq. ft.
GARDEN OF THE GODS CLUB
UNIT DENSITY ANALYSIS
A. Proposed
Proposed accom. units = 17 = 8.5 dwelling units per (18.04.030)
Proposed dwelling units = J = 3.0 dwelling units
Total = l'l .5 dwe11 ing unj ts
B. Existing
Existing accom. units = 20 = 10.0 dwelling units (18.04.030)
Existing dwelling units = 'l =_]rg dwelling units
Tota'l = ll.0 dwe]ling units
C. Al I owab'l e
Al'lowable units per acre = 25 x .505 acres = 12.62
a
GARDEN OF THE GODS CLUB
PARKING ANALYSIS
A.Proposed
3 dwelling units w/6962 sq. ft.
l7 accom. units w/8267 sq. ft.
B. Exisiting
I dwelling unit w/4285 sq. ft.
20 accom. units 3/9055 sq. ft.
Restuarant w/517 sq. ft. + l5
AvailaFle Spaces
Total spaces available
(15 at building & ll across
3 x .5 space'Per dwe'l 'l ing
69.62 x .1 space Per 100 sq. ft.
17 x .4 space per accom. unit
82,67x .l space Per 100 sq. ft.
Total required spaces
= 1.5
.= 7.0
= 6.8
= 8.267
= 24.0
,r.!t)
I x .5 space per dwelling unit
42.85x .l space Per 100 sq. ft.
20x .4 space per unit
90.55x .l space Per 100 sq. ft.
34.47 occupancy load * l0
Total required spaces
= .$
= 4.28
= 8.0
= 9.055
= 3.45
= 26.0
c.
26.0
\.J r..--r- I \)f-:_-l
dtt
_tr!=*(i .,1:$.f->
I
t
Hfl*
$iris
tI
0-'
----r-.-.
I_t{
j
Ii
Il
I
II
--*r-*---j
I
j
I
@r
a
\
dP Vt*==
---t-----
o0
l\.r
o$
:)\ss
/\
AMENDMENT
AppI-icatlon Date'r
Publlcatlon Date
Publlc Hearing Date
TO
TOWN OII VAIL
APPLICATION FOR
ZONING DISTRICT
?o
(REZON ING )
Name of Applicant
Name of Owner lf
Cor4
different fron Applicant A. € Httt.
Matling Address
Te I-ephone
Le ga1- DescrLption:
- L6S
tot K , Bloik {4, Flling Vu;t/ s-r(
If Proper t.y is Unplatted, submlt metes & bounds descriptio.n as
exhib it )
Appltcation is hereby made for an Amenclment to the Zonlng Dlstrict
Described as folLows:
atur/ of Appy'icant
fi'l
APPLICATION WILL NOT'BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOIJING:
1. Iiearing Fee - $100 + $f.40 for EACH addressed envelope.
2. A LIST OF TIIE OWNERS OF Tt{E PROPERTIES within 300 f eet in a Single-Farnil'
Res jdential ; Two-Faurily Residential ; or Two-Family Prirnary/Secondary
Residential Zone District; or adjacent to t,he subject proPerty
in a1l- other Zone Districts
3. Maps and other documents as required by the Zoning Administrator.
4. A description of the precise nature of the proposed change and
an explanation of why it is being proposed.
r. ,\
\F)#"--'n \-Lr
I\,IEMBERS PRESBNT
pnuurr0aND EN'TR.NMENTAL .o*rrrlo
Minutes of September 8, 1980 I'leeting
STAFF PRESENT
Gaynor l,liller
John Perkins
Gerry White
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Jim lilorgan
the'meeting was called to order by Gerry White.
1. Approval of .
Roger Tilkemeier corrected the minutes saying that he had abstained
in the vote on the Lionshead Gondola building, making the vote on that
6-0, with one abstention.
Roger also felt that he had voted in favor of item * 6, a setback
varianie for Lot 34, Block 1, Vail l'leadows Subdivision, Filing 1.
That vote would then be 6-1 in favor of denial .
,fOhn Perkins seconded--the motion for adjrournment for that meeting.
EdDragermqzedthese minutes be approved subject to the,above changesr
Roger gilkemeier seconded, the vote was ?-0 in favor of approval
2. Approval of minutes of September 2, 1980 meeting-
Dan Corcoran moved these minutes be approved, Ed Drager seconded,
and the vote for approval was 6-0. Gerry Vlhite abstained.
3.Villaqe Center Buildin Tract C, Block 58, Vail Villa e 1s! Filin
.Tim Rubin
Betsy Rosolack
COUNCIL MEMBER PRESBNT
-
Ron Todd
Density Control Variance and an Exterior
a 2,900 square foot commercial space and
Modification to
a 1, 10 0 sciuare
constructfoot manager's
apartment addition.
Jim Rubin presented the staff memorandum stating that this item had been
postponed until the second floor was redesigned. He felt that perhaps
it ltroufa be postponed another 30 days to permit a look at the bus and
walkways.
Discussion followed suggesting two concepts: The inclusion of a second
story with a smalLer foot print, or a one story with a larger foot print.
Some felt that it may be better not to discuss this now, since they would
have to go back in ab aays to see what Jeff Winstcin of Gage Davis Associates
had planned.
Gerry White felt that in all fairness to the applicant, he was entitled
to find out the commission members' reaction to the Plan.
-PEC Minutes - 9-8-AO nJ Z
Fred Hibberd said he'd like to hear the comments on either of the twoproposals, and commented that the 2 story was actualLy L-I/2 stories.He added that, for the record, they might want to wait to see where thebus route would come in.
,Jim Rubin stated. that the Urban Design Guide PIan used one story as a guide.Discussion of height. followed, and Fred felt that there was an inaccuracyin the urban Design Guide Pran outline of Building D. He repeated theidea that they wait until the bus route was known.
John Perkins added that there would be high vehicular traffic on thiscorner, and that might influence their decision :,
Conments from the rnembers:
Jim Morgan: I feel that the original presentation was a better transitionin roof line.
Ed Drager: rf the guide lines suggest one story, r feel we shourd staywith the guide lines. If the applicant wants something larger. I feel heshould say why it should be Iarger.
Dan Corcoran: I prefer the first presentation without the top floor and.with a larger .open area
'John Perl<ins: I favor the first presentation, but f 'm not srrre if I favorit without the 2nd floor or not. I can'approve of it vertically, but withoutknowledge of bus routes, etc, we don't have all the pieces to m-aie a decision
Gaynor: I agree with Jirn and John, the orignal plan is the mostaesthetic and can be worked out. r can't commit to a decision, but thestepping down of the roof seems less stark.
Roger Tilkemeier: I prefer the first to the second plan.abrupt. We should wait to see where the bus routes come.
Gerry: r feel that the originat urban Design pran with a story added toit is my choice. Until we know what is needld for busses and wilkw-ys,we cantt make a decision.
Fred Hibberd requested that the item be tabled until the october 13meeting.
John Perkins moved that the item be tabled until October 13 at the requestof the applicant,. Roger Tilkemeier seconded.. The vote was unanimous. Z-0in favor of tabling.
4. Cyrano's, application for an Exterior Alterat,ion and ModificaLion toallow an addition onto the existing Gondola Ski Sho buildinq.
Jim Rubin presented the staff memorandum and the staff recommendationwith the three conditions as stated in the memo. Jemy Greven of Cyranotsshowed plans and elevations. Jim Rubin stated thab, it was nonconfoimingin that it covers more of the site than presently allowed. He ad.ded thatthe site coverage requirement c,an be-supirceAea lf the chanqe isa positive one. He added that the stafi feels trrit-ttre-p;ti; ifr ttre tracfis a positive contribution since it is on the south, and that the area
It is not as
P'nC r,runites - 9-8-80 nC ,
for which it is ProPosed is not
parking spaces were discussed, and Jerry was rerninded that more spaces
may be required (the Payment for them).
The Northwest corner of the building was felt to be an eyesore and that
Mr. Colombo must address this part or tne design. Members were unhappy
with the visibility of the trash dump and the parking sPace'
Gaynor Miller moved that the commission approved the addition of 120
"qi,.r. feet rrrith the staff recommendations included. Roger seconded
tliis, and the vote was 7-0 in favor ofthe application'
E Vail villaqe Inn, Unit 128, Conditionat use Per:mit to alIow lhis unit
turY 2I ReaI Estate Co'
Jim Rubj-n presented the staff memo and.explained that the staff recommended
denial because of the 50 parking sPace deliciency existinSt now and because
to approve could add to the congestion in an already congested area.
Discussion includeit the fact that the 3rd phase would bring the parking
"pi.u" into confot*u.rr"., but that it was unclear when or if the 3rd phase
would be built. The applicant, van Ewing stated that this office would
not generate any additional auto traffic, and Lhat parking was- provided
for this unit now. He added that his employees would park in the parking
structure. Mention was made of Mike Palmerts office and that it was not
to generate auto traffic, but that I or 2 cars daily were ticketed there'
Motion to deny for the reasons outlined by the staff was'made by Dan
Corcoran, seconded by Jim Morgan. Vote was unanirnous, 7-O'
6. Garden of the 6,ods C1ub, zone change request from Public Accommodation
(HDMF) '
Jim Rubin presented this and mentioned that there. had been changes since
the memohadlbeen wriLten. Onb sleepingunit'woufdberemoved & made into
a managler's apartment. AIl changeJ wouta be interior with the possible
exception of a couPle of windows.
Gordon Pierce, ardhitect for the project, stated that there would be fewer
people, fewer cars, no restaurantl aia ttrat each unit would contain extremely
smatl kitchens. The owner was requesting the change because financially
the private lodge rvould not work out.
Roger T. mentioned that a lodge was favorable in the cornnercial core'
.nd romp-red the situation in Lionshead where Lhere are few todges in the
core, and that condo owners tend to stay in more. The building is in a key
Location. The feeting of some of the members was that it could be changed
to a public lodge.
Gordon pierce stated that this was not in Lionshead, but in an area where
there is already a good mix of diffcrent uses. This was a small private
club rnade into i few apartments. He felt that. lhe commission wasn't con-
sistent, that this was down zoning, and felt that iL was a good move on the
Townrs part.
now very aesthetic.
PEC Minutes - 9-8-80 - paqe 4o
Gerry felt that the need for accommodation units was important in a resort.that. the number of accommodation units was what made a i-esort work.Ed Drage:: felt that if they were changed to condo units, the accommodationunits would be lost forevei. Dan pointed out that there was a differencein down-zoning and change of use. More discussion of the effect of removinqaccommodation units not being good for the town. ilohn Perkins did.rot -----'
agree with the others. He fe1t, that this was a special reguest thatdid not quite fit as p.A. units as they are presently used] ue fel_tthat if it were changed to condominiums, the nurnber of people wou1d belessened who wourd have an impact. He also fert that the iown has nooption to gain public accommodations.
gerry white disagreed, ancl mentioned that he had had 4 peopre come tohis lodge from the Garden of the Gods requesting lodging alconunodations.Others suqsested that it be chanqed from-the prLvate-club to public lodgingto keep tir6 use coniistent-*iiir'Li,e zone aistrict.
Gordon wanted to know how the Town coulcl object to down zoning, and theanswer seemed to be that it was the use thal was object,ed to, not thedown zoning. and that these units would not serve tfie pubric.
Roger Tilkemeier moved to recommend to the Town Council that the zoningchange of the Garden of the Gods from Public Accommod.ation to nigh oensityMulti-family be denied because lodging units are vital to the well being -
of a resort community. Dan corcoran seconded this. The vote was 6-lwith John Perkins voting against denial
Gerry told the applicant 1tra! this wourd be brought to the councilon september 16. Ed Drager moved. that the staff send a memo to thecouncil explaining the commissionrs position, Roger seconded this, andthe vote was 6-1, John perkins agaiust. tt. idea. -
Gordon requested a copy of these mitrutes.
More discussion of the item followed.. Gerry felt that to grant thechange would set a dangerous precedent, Ant hotel courd be convertedto a privaLe c1ub, and then converted into iondominiums
Ron Todd felt that Gordon did have a point with regard to inconsj-stenciesin Town actions. He felt that if tfreie had been real concern that thi.scould happen, the time to show it would, have been at the time that theapplicant asked to be a private club.
,f,ohn moved to adjourn and Dan seconded. Unanimous vote.adjourned ab 4:45 p.m.The meeting
o
TO:TOWN COT]NCIL
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/JTM RUBIN
DATE: Septeinlcer I0' 1980
RE:planning and EnvironmentaL Commission R.Ecolunendations on Garden of
the Gods Rezoning Reguest.
The Planning anil- Environmental Commission by a 6-1 vote (John Perkins
opposed) re;ommended denial of the Garden of the Gods Rezoning Request frcm
PubLic Accommodations (PA) to lligh Density Multi-I'arnily (HD{F) . Their
vote reflected very strong feelings that the Public Acconmodations zone
should not be dirniiished inil that-Lodge rooms were a vital part of the
Vail community. They furthermore stated that the Garden of.the Gods
previous chan-ge of u-se to a private cl:rb should have no bearing on this
iequest. ttteir recornmendation was that the Gardens of the Gods Cfub'
if anything, be converted. back into a Hotel./Lodge use'
,fohn Perkins felt that it wasnrt presently'being used as a lodqe' so
that.the requested change would not be rernoving existing lodge units'
tu
Qa WfrL)U\W
,A-t(^/ n5 T.q'/
> Q"'lL- aae-a.W*-
0"'L I q16 U:t-dr^'A A<
Pr*-4 fr.I?r-a (0'.+
D6<!4 4 grzs 5
Il a.^fz"f- ry'l,a-Jt h.4 \r1*',u.+a,
16 oz--a.av+1r 4j/re,
frtr"-"n
7.1
al
I
^T4TLG7*- |
7 TLa^
lR?& .+..Lo
d/-4fu1
| / 1bg -'T\l
3r'txI
ttrL'{
,4-.*^ %*fu"a*
a,4 16
/l,s11
l4?L/x
(J-T x
7s-s V
t6k
/(-J-5= lq?
8-; l3a
5-?s Y
1Ll
aI
L.+ 7+'*
7\ro(>
lq.t Y4x
L*J,o i*ilasA
//ut&-
7-"s=
7.)f=
7I A
'J-}r\n-rx tt :
f5f.O>o
I 81
a S7. >s
I @-t. ->
96 I.2s
5ro
13, b'"a
/
-j= w^l
pr,allN rOaND EN'rR'Nr{TJNTAL "o*r* ,oo
Minutes of September 8, 1980 Meeting
MBMBERS PRESENT
Gaynor Miller
John Perkins
Gerry White
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Jim Morgan
STAFF PRESENT
Jim Rubin
Betsy Rosolack
COUNCIL I{EMBER PRESENT
Ron Todd
The meeting was calIed to order by Gerry White.
1. Approval of minutes of August 25, 1980.
Roger Tilkemeier corrected the minutes saying thatin the vote on the Lionshead Gondola buildj-ng, making6-0, with one abstention.
he had abstainedthe vote on bhat
Roger also felt that he had voted in favor of item # 6, a setbackvariance for Lot 34, Block 1, Vail Meadows Subdivision, Filing 1.That vote would then be 6-I in favor of denial .
John Perkinr: seconded .the motion for adjournment for that meeting.
EdDragermozedthese minutes be approved subject to the above changes,Roger Tilkemeier seconded, the vote was 7-0 in favor of approval'
2. Approval of minutes of September 2, t9B0 meeting.
Dan corcoran moved these minutes be approved., Bd Drager seconded.,and +-he vote for approval was 6-0. Gerrv White abstained
3.Villaqe Center Buildin Tract c, Block 58, vail Vi11as_g__rE!_IgincDensity Control Variance and an Exteri.or Modification to constructa 21900 square foot commercj_al space and a 11100 square foot manager'sapartment addition.
Jim Rubin presented the staff memorandum stating that this item had been- postponed until the second. floor was redesigned. He fe1t, that perhapsit should be postponed another 30 days to permit a look at the bui andwalkways.
Discussion followed suggesting two concepts: The inclusion of a secondstory with a smaller foot print, or a one story with a rarger foot print.
Some felt that it may be bet.ter not to discuss this now, sj-nce they wouldhave to go back in 30 days to see what Jeff Winston of Gage Davis Assocj-ateshad planied.
Gerry White felt that in all fairness to the applicant, he was entitled.to find out the corunission members' react-ion to the pJ.an.
:::.::::::"-,:;:-::,:"E: to hear rhe comments orQ*her of rhe rwo
proposals, and commented that the 2 story was actuaLly 7'l/2 stories
if. .aa"a that, for the record, they might want to wait to see where the
bus route would come in.
.Tim Rubin stated that, the urban Desigrn Guide Plan used one story as a guide.
Discussion of height followed, and Fred felt that there was an inaccuracy
in the Urban nesi6n Guide PIan outline of Building D. He repeated the
idea that they wai-t until the bus route was known'
,John Perkins added that there would be high vehicular traffic on this
corner, and that might influence their decisj-on
Comments from the members :
lTim Morgan: I f eel that the original presentation was a better transiti-on
in roof line.
Ed Drager: If the guide lines suggest one story, I feel we should stay
with tfre guide 1inei. If the appiicant v/ants something larger, I feel he
should say why it should be larger.
Dan Corcoran: I prefer the first presentation without the top floor and
with a larger oPen area.
John Perkins: I favor the first presentation, but I'm not sure if I favor
it without the 2nd floor or not. I can approve of it vertically. but without
k;;I;a;;-of bus routes, etc, we don't have alt the pieces to make a decj-sion
Gaynor: I agree with Jim and John, the orignal plan is the most
aesthetic and can be worked out. I can't commit to a decision, but the
stepping down of the roof seems less stark.
Roger Tilkemeier: I prefer the first to the second plan. It is not as
abrupt. We should wait to see where the bus routes come'
Gerry: I feel that the original urban Design Plan with a story added to
it i; my choice. Until we lnow what is needed for busses and walkways'
we cantt make a decision.
Fred Hibberd requested that the item be tabled untj-l the october 13
meeting.
,John Perkins moved that the item be tabfed until October 13 at the request
of the applicant. Roger Tilkemeier seconded. The vote vras unanimous, 7-0
in favor of tabling.
4. Cyranots, application for an Exterior Alteration
allow an addition onto the existing Gondofa Ftci'--Ettpf
Jim Rubin presented the staff memorandum and the Ftaff recommendation
with the three conditions as stated in the memo. Jerry Greven of-Cyrano's
showed plans and elevations. .Ij-m Rubin stated that it was nonconforming
in that it covers rnore of the site than presently allowed. He added that
the site coverage requirement can be superceded if th-e change is ..a positive one. - ge aldded that the stiri feels that the patfo in the back
is a positive contribution since it is on the south, and that the area
and Modification to
buildinc.
F4
p'rc
for
Munites - 9-8-80 illte 3
which it is
Parking spac.es
may be required
proposed is not noll very aesthetic.
were di.scussed, and ,ferry was reminded that more spaces
(the payment for them).
The Northwest corner of the building was felt to be an eyesore and that
Mr. Colombo must address this part of the design. l4embers were unhappy
.with the visibility of the trash dump and the parking space.
Gaynor Mifler moved that the commission approved the addition of I2O
square feet with the staff recommendations included. Roger seconded
this, and the vote was 7-0 in favor ofthe application.
5.Vail Villa e Inn Unit 128 Conditional Use Permit to allow this unit
to be used as a real estate photo gallery for Century Real Estate Co.
Jim Rubin presented the staff memo and explained that the staff recommended
denial because of the 50 parking space deficiency existing now. and because
to approve could add to the congestion in an already congested area.
Discussion included the fact that the 3rd phase would bring the parking
spaces into conformance, but that it was unclear when or if the 3rd phase
would be built. The applicant, Van Ewing stated that this office would
not generate any additional auto traffic, and that parking was provided
for thj-s unit now. He adcled that his employees woul-d park in the parking
structure. Mention was made of Mike Palmer's office and that it was not
to generate auto traffic, but that I or 2 cars daily were ticketed there.
Motion to deny for the reasons outlined by the staff was nade by Dan
Corcoran, seconded by Jim Morgan. Vote was unanimous, 7-0.
6. Garden of the Gods Cfub, zone cha
Jim Rubin presented this and mentioned that there had been chanqes sincethe memohad.been written. onb sleepingunif wouldberemoved a madd intoa managerrs apartment. A11 changes would be interior with the possible
exception of a couple of windows.
Gordon Pierce, architect for. the project, stated that there would be fewer
people, fewer cars, no restaurant, and that each unit would contain extremely
small kitchens. The owner was reguesting the change because financially
the private lodge would not work out.
Roger T. mentioned that a lod.ge was favorable in the commercial core'
and compared the situation in Lionshead where there are few lodges in the
core, and that condo owners tend to stay in more. The building is in a keylocation. The feeling of some of the members was'that it could be changedto a public lodge.
Gordon Pierce stated that this was not in Lionshead. but in an area where
there is already a good mix of different uses. This was a small private
club made into a few apartments. He felt that the commission wasnrt con-sistent, that this was down zoning, and felt that it was a good move on the
Town's part.
PEC l"linutes - 9-8-80 - page 4
vGerry felt that the need for accommodation units was important in a resort.that the number of accommodation units was what mad.e a resort work.Ed Drager felt that if they were changed to condo units, the accommodationi units would. be lost forever. Dan pointed out that. there was a dj-fferencein down zoning and change of use. More discussion of the effect of removingaccommodation units not being good for the town. John Perkins did notagree with the others. He felt that this was a special request thatdid not quite fit as P.A. units as they are presently used. Ile feltLhat if it were changed to condominiums, the number of people would belessened who would have an impact. tle also felt that the Town has nooption to gain public accommodations.
Gerry White disagreed, and mentioned that he had had 4 people come tohis lodge from the Garden of the Gods requesting lod.ging accomrnodations.Others suggested that it bb changed from the private club to public lodgingco Keep Lhe use consistent with the zone district.
Gordon wanted to know how the Town could object to dovin zoning, and theanswer seemed to be that it was the use that was objected to, not the
down zoning. and that these units would not serve th.e pu-blic.
Roger Ti-l.kemeier moved to recomrnend to the Town CounciL that the zoningchange of the Garden of the Gods from Public Accormnoclation t'o uigh oeniitytrIulti-faniily be denied because lodging units are vital to the well bei-ngof a resort cornmunity. Dan Corcoran seconded this. The vote was 6-1r'rith .lohn Perkins voLing against denial .
Gerry told the applicant glag this would be brought to the Councj-I.. on Septenber 16. Ed Drager moved. that the staff send a memo to .theCouncil explaj-ning the commission's position, Roger seconded this, and' the vdte was 6-1, John perkins against the idea.
Gor:don requested a copy of these minutes.
More discussion of the item followed. Gerry felt that to grant the
change would set a dangerous p::ecedent. Any hotel could be convertedto a private club, and then converted into condominiums.
Ron Todd felt that Gordon did have a point with regard to inconsistenciesin Town acLions. He felt that if there had been real concern that thiscould happen, the tj-me to show it would have been at the time that theapplicant asked to.be a private club.
,John moved to adjourn and Dan seconded.. Unanimous vote. The meetingadjourned at 4:45 p.m.
'.llF lt
PT'BLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that A.G. HilI of the HiIl DeveloPment
Company has applied for Rezoning of the Garden of the Gods Club
located on Lot K, Block 5A, Vait Village 5th Filing from Public Ac-
conmodation (PA) to High Density Multi-Family (HDMF)
Application has been made in accordance with Section 18.56.I10
of the Vail Municipal Code.
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 18.56.050
of the Municipal Code on September 8, 1980 at 3:00 P.M. before the
Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Conunission. Said Hearing
will be held in the Vail Municipal Building.
The application and information relating to the proposed change
is available in th'e zoning Administrator's office during regular
busniess hours for review or inspection by the public.
Jim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
TOVIN OF VAIL
DEPARTI'{ENT OF CO},lMttNITy DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail- Trail, August 22, L980.
TO: TOWN COUNCTT'
FROM: DEPARTMBNT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/JIM RUBIN
DATE: Septenlcer 10, J-980
RE: Revisions and corrections to Garden of the Gods Club
rezoning memorandum
Several mistakes were made in the Memorandum'to the Planning and Environ-
mental Commission dated Septernber 4, 1980 on the Garden of the Gods Cluc
Rezoning Request. There were also some revisions to the orj-ginal plans'
which adclress some of the concerns stated in the Department's Recommeni3t:cn.
These changes were all discussed at the Pu-blic Hearing before the Planning
and Environmental Commission.
In the first paragraphs under Description of Request, the 8 Accommodation
Units should be changed to 12 and the 4 Dwelling Units should be changed
to 6. Also in the first paragraph, the last sentence should be changed
to stat,e that one of the two other employee units would. be remo'/ed with
the other one being converted into a Managerts Apartment.
In the Statistics sect,ion, under Number of Units Existing, the 16 Acconno-
dation Units should be changed to 12. Under the Proposed' the B dwelJ"i:rg
units shoutd be changed to 7 and the 2 Employee Sleeping rooms should
be changed to t Manager's Apartment. Under the GRFA, the Proposed should
be changed to read 13,110 square feet. This would put the GRFA under
what is allowed in the HDMF Zone District, so that the reguest v/ould
completely comply with the HDMF District requirements.
t
PT]BLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that A.G. HilI of the Hill Development
Company has applied for Rezoning of the Garden of the Gods CIub
located on Lot K, Block 5A, Vail Village 5th Fil-ing from Public Ac-
commodation (PA) to High Density Mu1ti-Family (HDMF).
Application has been made in accordance with Section 18.66.110
of the Vail Municipal Code.
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 18.66.060
of the Municipal Code on September 8, 1980 at 3:00 P.M. before the
Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. Said Hearing
will be held in the VaiI tilunicipal Building.
The application and information relating
is available in th'e Zoning Administrator's
busniess hours for review or inspection by
to the proposed change
office during regular
the lic.
Jim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMI'NITY DEVELOPMENT
gust 22, 1980.,-^
/ 6 I u tSr
r A f- P^ ,;ffi' /2'l
\ / /2,1a. rt f d.c L.tt --tS n - /: .. o(
\/ Or / G t, I tz /' ,1 ,z , /' C.".J, /r"ttc,v -' Pu F"x rrb.s' /Jt#t:E-'
7^/*,/1.I cr
Published in the VaiI Trail,.At)
t3di 76,ui.v /r? rt("/
<l/r/ruo/, Loal+{Lts
)uf:e z t
,//\/ t//a\/ | tt
-.t t
e.,/rr ChYt s f( ^ /7 t r-''
f;::ffTu&,- ":'
Qr c ud,4 u,9) p v
f3, x '-7 {t'
L----- "-l-c, :
Fcbruary 17, 1976
!,1r. Tim Garton
Box 705Yafl, Colondo
Rc: Valhallr Lodge
Dear Tln:
As we.dlscuscad, the permltted uses In the publlc Accomnodailonc
:91,! I.n whlch the Vathaila ts located, Include loogii (a;ii;;;'-Deloyt) and a naxlnum of 2ar acccssory restaurant, 6ar dnd retallu3es.
Lodse - A bulldlngoccupancy prlnarl lyor fanl I les, eltherIn whlch the grorstlon unlts exceedg
dwel I I ng unl ts , onda glngle managementhotel servlces and
0r group of rssoclated bulldlngs deslgned foras the tenporary lodglng place of lnllvtdurls
I n acconmodatl on unl ts or dwel I I ng unl ts ,rerfdantlal floor rrea dGvoted to icconrnoia-the gross resfdentlrl floor area devoted toIn whlch all such unlts are operated under
_p19y!dtnE the occuprnts thereof curtomaryfacllftles.
Pll!!llq ulll:.lny room or.9!oup of roosrs tn a nrulil-fanflyDultdrng wtt! dttchen frcllltles deslgned for or used as r iwel-llng by one faartly qr rn lndepeqdent frousekeeplng-unit irrictr'uiy!lq!gd" one rttached-accommoaitton unii-no'iilgii ttran one-thtrd(l/3) of thc totrl floor trai;- -
4ccglnmgfatlqn |Jnlt - Any room or group of roonc wlthout kltchenfrcttt!tgs dcstgnad for or adapted to occupancy by guests andaccess{ble fron common corrldors, rrlks, oi. baic6irlis wlthout.parslng through another rccommodsilon unlt or dwelting unii. -
Elther.lype of unlt nry be condomlnlunrlzed wlthout belng subJactto subdlvlslon or zonlng-regulatlons so long ar the tougr-iiii-of management and oparrt{on-renlln.
Slncerely,
DTPARTIIIENT OF COI.IIIU}I I TY DEYELOPIIE}IT
0lana S. Toughf I I , Zonl ng Adml nl strator
I
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
DATE OF MEETING:
NAME:{;!:t tt
ADDRESS (MAILING)
NAME OF PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
FILING
PLAN #:
t /rt
NEVIEI.l BOARD
September 15, IflT
o
DES
b.l 1t Drrnf flJ.L.ll rrLr\r^ 4
Lou Parker
BiLl BishoP
Ron Todd
Abe ShaPiro
a
IGN
DATE OT
I{EI,IBERS
,
TIl TTT}Il:.
DD nqt?llT .
5ll,rrv!.! . .
AgIION TAKEN BY BOARD:
MOTION:
Garden
ABSTENTION:
APPROVED:I
DISAPPROVLD:
SUI'lIlAnY: A
e
DESIGN REVIEW BOAND APPLICATION
NAME: P u, ttl
ADDRESS (MAILING).
NAME OT PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION OI' PROJECT :
, BLOCK_, FTLTNG
DATE OF MEETING:
PI,AN #:
tr.a
DESIGN REVIEI'I BOARD
DATE ON TIEETING ' ?. '1
. 27.
}IEII{BERS PRESENT:Bill Ruoff
Lou Parker
Bill BishoP
Ron Todd
Abe ShaPiro
ACTION
S.'JBJECT:
VCfIE:
APPROVtrD:
DISAPPROVED:
AGAINST:
ABSTENTION:
SUlrlllARY:
Eiii'fi'nxti-ol' tlrc Uo:tld
DESIGN REVIEIY BOARD APPLICATION
It
DArE oF MEETTNG , ilk /;'* // / ? 7',/
ADDRESS (MATLTNG)_-?e??
NAME OF PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
LOT_, BLOCK_,IILING
/tlf-/
.,,1PLAN #: t
DDSIGN nEvIEi\' Bo[!q
DATE O[ IIEETING:
ITEMBERS PRESENT:
September 1, 1977
Bill Ruoff
Lou Parker
Bill BishoP
Ron Todd
Abe ShaPiro
SIBJECT:Garden of the GodS---- n
AGAINST:VOTE: TOR:
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
-r
ABSTINTION:
SUlrllt{ARY:
oz
t
=G,
uJo
oorn
oo
<\l
oo
!-{
oc)o
(r)
o
IJJ
uJ
lJ-t
=E
uJo.
ffi+Y,lvf u I
I
I
I
$
I
sl_\
N-R
INs\ib
s
I
l_
t?ro
I
I
I
IFt<
rF|.tz
t=
lotz,zlq
I
oo
ah
4t^'=in-ul o.
2v
21lo
3*€+,o9
=lz+tOur
o,o
6
!(6
V'+,
rdI
c)td
(F
E€)
a6
c,l-
0)c)lJ-
()q,
UJz
=o
ulIF
oz
l!)
IJJo
=I
l-
Fzoo
o
E
u,lz
=o
t!o
o
o)
q)
E
-9-o(t
.9
CL
CLo
c!o
F
o
o()o
o
6
o
O
o,
E
@
E
o
=c
-io
o
o
!
.9
()
o)'6
o
sio
oo
oa'5
o!
o
!
(E
o!
'E
oN
o)
ct
E
()
o,
q,
E'=
.o
6
<t)
=(5
(,
(!
o
E
o
4,,oo
(il
€
3
F
(u
z
3
9o(6C
6(!
E.E6^6
cFcti
o'-aP
oi,
E5a;(J>(!a
EE;U6€EarEEoo,o(u
+,o
E
oo
.9ao.:
oo
o6
o)p
.9
E
E
fg
E
co
6
E
o
(D
.;
o
oI
.9
aE
o,
0)
C'
=(!
-c
oo)E
o);o
.Yo(6
o{)
o
rn
o?
O!r\
(\.1
oq
rf)
(7)
oo
osf
oIocf)
oo
rrlori
oo
rtt
cc
c
(\ror\
r\
<\
F
uJ
z
J
x
UJ
z
J
F
llt
ut
zo
d
2
C)
uJ
=
u.lrll
z
tr
utEo
r.lJ
.D
B
IJJt
UJclzo
UJ
Fa
UJo
z
uJ
()
x
F
UJ(h
at
uJ
uJ
E
=
UJd
bF
('zo!
f
ao
-t
9EFoul
UJ
z6
=
E
J
2
Iolu
=
NOrrvQlVA
lr+
t-elct:ol!t l=S IENl
r llJrg. r.
s.i
= x_a:= -+-v, zEt o'Fof,+
ECo
E=
*E
H3
=>E
--
= all
=o
z
ho-
trcao7z<)zl!<o*
9UFO
l-
.E|Pu,
=o!
P
=a)
I
+.'
=
!
!o
(|'
6
tn
=
(r)
tF
ro
o
od
z
tr
F
o
e.
uJo-
t-
ooo
lJ)r-l
o-
uJE
z9troo
z
EE
UJ
=tuz
/'1
\
g
F
J
a
J
?E
4
uJ
ut
o
uJ
tr
ooo
=
E
J
R
S
Fd
=d.F IIJ
Eo-z
e9
Z)f<(,()ze.
=<HgEeooo
Ez
z
tr
ig
3
-
(
L
rf)
Fl
=r>
I o-
F
Jv
,}\
J
-JF55
JFY
uJ
r-{
cr)
,.ta
r{
Y-l,)
)
(\I
@
Io(r1
I
@
llJF
o
uJFoooazo
Fo-
UJY
uJ
dt
or
tr
=IE
UJ
t!o
o-oo
I
uJFoz
&!n
=
uj
l!
:!{E:E<cIf,€8B9at ir
'e=EE itE !Er
=FE 65P 5pt x>E EF
o-irri
ul
cooF
IT--
z
.n9
=<
=zJOaI t!
=E==fii6- -': LUcotr>
E
=Elrlo-zoF(JfEFazo()
ol
=.1olull
5l
<l>l
t!lol
zl
3l
9l
-l
zl
ol
uJlEI
zl
=lolFI
(u!o
od.
UI'('oC'
(u
.p
(F
o
(l,!l-(o
ii
=z
F
,ll
{lI|
ol
zl
3l
9lFI
I
I
I
I
I
.lol
..1
ol
Lul
1l
<l>l
u-lolzt ..:
=I :Ol urFI F
>Y;();s
!zu-o
uJ
tsI
<FCO
IJJ <zE
IJJ F(42oo
Jt<o(JF
l.<i, E
--2
oFO
Fz
(J
z
-Ol,lj
*Eo2.EEE'
o
o
(Dc
q)
(s
=o-
$
3o
t--
o
0)(Jc
(6 .Y',tt "6
tl ]Jc_$no,^ o)
Eo
.:o
Y-(l,o:
;.o
_tt
-c_
>6qN
;()o
a
q).:
:J(t
q.)
a(u
d)p
c
(o
o
o)
'5
cr
c)
(:
';
(\:
E
.E
0)
==
;:l
Eg
i
aulFoz
oz
oJ
ld){
od
o.zzlo
J
Sl
il-
F
g:
F.
v)z
=
)
G{!
o!:)
c)
(
UJ
LUl!
t:
tr
LIJ
i::z.
t!
.Jd
=r
uJ
z
zi:<Soar<oo- t!o!u
;>
>(Joz(Jf,
F
i--: r'rJ< E?g=a'
5rq.>gtlorrroo-z
o
om
g
LU
a
o
Do\
lri
O
F
ft
cr
oEo
@
hl
;,.{(,
"4\"
2
f
tr
o
o
C]
II
I- tlr'l
Fz
l
z
J
Bo
t
o
.L:
z
tll
LUu-
=.s
LU
o-
F
F
oJ
:lo
z
.D
:)
z
I(J
uJ
=
NOtlvnlv
zIl-
5az
-.1
'f
1ll
$l
{l
q
\lol
Jl
trlsl
q
;
o3
z
t:
cr
tllo
ct:,ul
LIJ
^=\q
ru*
<C\
\-J
z
^6
(ro
(Jz
o-fo
o
(\l
'\\)
z
i:
f,
(ts
F
z
;
tl,)
?t
E
CL
E
a
E
Oo
th
;F
z
E
Lf-
=
v,
4 -tH;5il.ul
I
I
I
i
I
I
ol
(9t
ull
5t
3l
LLIol
;l 5ol ur
Fl l-
zl.loluil
it
=l<l>l
XI
zl
3tpl
I
I
I
I
I
I
cilzl
olrul
:l
al>lluol
zl
3l
FI
z:itr
ul;:
-J(,
UJJ
=1(Jl
url
1l
=l4I>l
LLIol
gl
olFI
o
t ir
L!-Lo.:|'- r-
K
<FdOtjt <zx.TUFAzo()
.(OOF
:-<
t]J=
-oJro
o:
z. t-
:<z(r
(I /-\
c)
E
F()
c(
l--z
()
.{
i.t
I
ltl
:.;
0
0
o'l
14
!
LTJ
(r
LUz3o
t!IF
z
c:(J
0)
oo
!
e
o:cf
o
3
OJ
OJ
o)
o
0)
l
t!,
,u1
"c
.c)
o
(u
U;-
$
c(d
.9
(g
E
;
t
6.
L:
o
c)c,
(O
d)
(u
97
(g
o
c,
o
6)
Eo
(o,
uN;
6J(I)
a)
ag
:
liJc
c)
r,)1:
G'
'
0)
o)
I
'Pi
z
,ra 9
a<m(]>z:ffJO
O- LLnnr
J.-i5VU;
= o'ft
.lF-
=ulli6 fi;i
tr
e.r!
o-
.)r UttroyzE<o, loy)
B9
=>: tt| -.'5 Er(J:r=
o <*
-9u-cuO
ii o*_
xul
-J!ii
u!dt
ot-
f-O,-|)i:
:E
c(
6
-
E
TUz;:
LI
{
ii
ll
ui-tr i
.r{
.l
rl
r'-1,:)
gu'bk'zo
UJFa
@
-)
z
t-(L
uJY
F
F
irul
o-
tt- |:\l
n\lx \It\l
bq
ffi.
t{l
n-
?
O
F"()
:
TYt-(rt
€-
e)t)
r. ''l l-- -
' Jl..r| ! l'- -\. i/ I--
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
rNs CTION REQUEST
/ll
TOWN OF VAIL
a.' ./'J l .-.r (.----CALLER
INSPECTION:MON TUES
JOB NAME
THUR FRI AM PM
',i .)
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
t] SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
,"Ji"'oN REOUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLEB
TUES THUR FRI AIi|
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
T] FRAMING
tr
tr
E]
tr
FOOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
-
tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
TTIECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
E
tr FINAL tr FINAL
,,'(-ot"touto, CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
4
,*#"rlbr.r REouESr
^ -/il 'oW o'?l-o''"'J^
DATE ? t1-i n
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
,.-.-'<*:-\.
'{y51)THUR FRIWED
.1-=..AM (.. PM )\r--_-/
BUILDING:
T] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
FOUNDATION / STEEL tr
tr
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL k,icrif/tr
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr rifer tr FINAL
..t-
4TAPPROVED
' coRREcrloNS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
'N#CTION REQUEST
OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
INSPEGTION:'MON
CALLER
TUES)WED
I'
THURREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
E FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLU[IBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
T] ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FBAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
D
tr
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
D
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
a urf(u tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORREGTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
*
INSPE CTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
7'27 -t L-JOB NAMEDATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MoN af@ WED THUR FRI
----@,,
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER;{rnnrtrrruo tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
GAS PIPING
NAIL POOL / H. TUB
FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL -N FINAI
tr APPROVED /-{orcnppaoveo 4,fiss1vsPEcr o N F Eeu I R ED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
'*rt"toN neouisr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES WEDI THUR\-../.FRI PMAM
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH/WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED I] REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,ru#"rroN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES iru^ t FRIWED PMAM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUNO
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
1-l ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr
tr
tr
n
GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n ..fi.1-,, ; c-, r.r
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
IIEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n,
tr SUPPLY AIR
n
n,{Kot tr FINAL
ED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE
REOUEST
VAIL
DATE
BEADY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATf ON: ) i: :' ' j' | " /
CALLER
TUES WED ; FRITHUR
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL EI ROUGH / D.W.V.
o'iroucH / wATERC] FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION C] POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
D HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr coNourT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
CPAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,"#"'oN..7 TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
,' /l
,!li,
r:1' t.. 'CALLER ' ;.1'I (
ruES ,fiCo; rHUR
,1,' /'
ilrrill ''
,i L,'JOB NAME
MON
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
ON / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEEB
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
-
O
_tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
/APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
o DlgAiPRbvED B REINSPECTION REQUIRED
:.
DATE lo"77*rr.Grqff*ry ,pF ro{f-' d,.-r1gi
t
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
wED @ FRI
----@
PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MqN
CALLER
TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W,V.
tr ROUGH / WATERd rnnurruo
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
n
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL/ H. TUB
r'l
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
D
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT (suenrv atn
tr-_O'K tr FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
oerc //-Z 6 - P-- rNSPEcroR
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN,OF VAIL
/^/, L,toeDATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
NAME
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR
CALLER
TUES AM FMftt-
BUILDING:
E FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
ATNSULATTON
tr SHEETROCK
E-
tr POOL/ H. TUB
NAIL tr
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
D ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr
tr SUPPLY AIR
n
osK tr FINAL
'{fupaoveo tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
/, CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
,*#"toN
TOWN OF
REOUEST
VAIL
IL:
I
CALLER/'': '-i' TUES'|
'. ili.i' iitt
/
DATE
.'-|., ,JOB NAME il I
READY FOR
LOCATION:
WED THUR FRI i,-, 'PM'
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH /WATEB
ON / STEEL
tr
rl
F
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr POOL/ H. TUB
NAI L_ tr
tr tr
O FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRI CAL:MECHANIGAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
PROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION BEOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
/
INSPECTION
1, i[7\* o'
o
REOUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES WED THUR
JOB NAME
MON
.n ,4c(t
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr
tr
tr
tr
FOUNDATION i STEEL
FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
Y rrrunl tr FINAL
PROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
t
PErNs CTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUB FRI /O,?rt rffi-> / pu
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
o
UMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
tr
r'1 FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
o
tr
tr
ROUGH tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIB
E FW{-tr FINAL
F/APlRovED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIREO
INSPECTOR
DATE
,*#"rroN
TOWN OF
REOUEST
VAIL
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI AMWED.READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
T] UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V,
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDAT
tr FRAMING
ION / STEEL
n 199.f^&^s-H.EFn...- tr cAS prprNc
-
" PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB -tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
-
r---
EI FINAL tr FINAL
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
-nn
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr,APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOB
oz
F
=EllJo-
oo
r.r)t\st
atul
IIJu-
F
=t
IJJo-
-11e 9A
Td
1l
!(
$t\\\
\(
t
1
J
ll
!l!l
\tnrco
lHi15t
l*
I
I
I
IIrl
t,g
!p ->
lE a'
'ro -v
i=;
u,lF
o
Eo
e
Iz
=
(,z
in
lrJFoz
2
=o
.6
o
=
tulz3
ulI
F
z
c;
c)
0,
I
-o(!
.9
CLclo
'oF
(Dc
O/tuooc
G
Eo
og
o
C'
0tEoo
ol
.s
=
c0
o
=cl
dq)
ooo
G;
,(D
E
-i- o c
iEt9
E.E R€*tgs
-.= (! F
- J_.: Oe 6E:0c-o>'c g sE
=
gi;
c96FIoSo
iEi F
Et gE
E!sect (g ct-
SE; e
oFEors€e€
E6:n
EEEg_cL;o
6 0'-.is; @ o? -E ,-
E't€!
: gi.E
rfi5i9rE o -eEg:
- o (6:
coo
@
F{
@
F
=ctl,c
=oJ
-ot!I(Jz
o-
J
EFoulJul
z
@
=DJo-
=
C)
uJ
=
UJul
z
tr
gJ
G()qJ
E
oa.
oo
=g
u,
2(,
U'qJo
F
al,oo-
UJoc
=2
uJJ()
x
F
UJol
.tl
IJJullt
ts
=c
UJ
o-
J<rFoF
oz
J
o
J
9c
L)llJJ
UJ
('z
.D
E
J
J
Iz
Eo
uJ
=
NO|lvntA
.,lullol
L1
:1?1(ol
o1
=l
5a't
qJ
E
(l,
o)!-
v
G,
;t!
zo
Fo-
E()
uJ
J
E
uJz
IJ,J
:
rtr>t)
ra:4)E;:
zzoo
F^alt3A
=t/, oz>.89u-<
\J=H6-8
.i .,i
c,
.6
.u
+J(o
=oc
+)
=
lt'+,a
c
zIF
fJ
l!
cc
ci
to
gJ
rf)r\.ir
@
E
o-
ll,tG
z9Eoo
z
9
F
E
UJFJ
i
uJz.
q,
trzlz
tr
o
:
oo
at)F2
=Jllt
=
oulo
J
LIJc
oz
Flt
=F
I
UJ
ul
J)
UJzYII
JJ
=F
u,
oo
=
ir IEt I2tl-l
=,)
'rl_l
o
F
at)
cil!
uJ
uJz
ts
u,lo
J
z
E
I
zF
U)
ID
\
ul
cft
I
I
t1tltltllollzllcj|I utl
l5lt<llilt:la3lEoltq Fl
;l
1l
?l>I
?lolFI
z
oultr
J
lt
z3oF
lltl
l;llil
IH
<\,f\f.-r.o
I
l--(\l
P()o
u.t
(U
o
ao
IJJ
L+)
L)(u
UJ
I
a!
(t
c.)
+J
(F
!L
.u
i'i
=zo
-)
it'
uJ
=z
ro
=
2?
E3fFd6
C)
(EoF
E.Fzo(J
L-Etr
=o2
)
I
F()
uJ
-Jut
E
-rO<Fd()uJ<zq
IIJ Fa6
o
u,lF
o
uJ
tsocloazo
Fo-ulY
UJo
oF
b
Eut
o-
l!o
o-oo
UJFoz
z
.rPze
c0o
=z=r=dP
dfi
=fi=B;H
tr
ut
bEqE<3A;eE9tl ir
sg
F EE: >o-i 8u9 !utE XO-f x>t q-
€=
UJdl
oF
-I
-
E
=E,lrlo-zIF(JfEF,
zo(J
!!tr
!Er
l$I c6 l_
i ti=bJr
FY;-\
#igi
at)t!
UJ
t4.
F
=
o-
t!L
=c<trl
Fo
nct66
ci a,
E-Oq)()=
Fqt
O.O(/|eto.
;3
lF.:('
e!
: Ol
)ol. (rl
iEo
q)
o
E
iu
o()
ct)
F
J
D
?
t.
J
D
)
t
u;fl:OE58";
3$gD c ().
: 6';i=t'
r )€ |
i; ,.i
;=(
-'eI'E sl.-.: <>F:
Q.N (
9'c Ev l=oo::Fo
s'e E
-*o 69-oo-ctc
E! q,o66c o a'rt()-
=.!O)
aoJ:3(D
,ctc
;c€
!J
.'s- u.e9
op
9a-rr (E
"-3(Dq')';(!q)
rJ
rCD
rC
o
l
t
Q'
o
qt
3o
q)
a- Ou-;:
jgot>ttruE
1.9 or_ oi !?o
:r-=
e:qr-
r i'
.PF.>=g.!
5 3.1
al! - \E Q.'r-Ea
E6:;sj
-Cr
-- €i
19 cL-
: o-:Eolr- c
0 c!E'.Orco:O()t=.!
ri=
r: (,
c)4r
=(/,sE''i o:i5''
5s ioo iOC(-nt-o -:Qrc'(;:;€J I
d:EE
=(us5c.a
r- Itt!g)
ssc\-
-a,o(!
=!l!'t:c9,
5 c'1o,9 :
!1 $-esl:!icc\
9Es
E!s
+.- t
a*'E;
a=E
:#Fses
l t-;
:(5i.a€i6sa9ar---
l(!c.
3'5:() >\':(!= i
E e*i
B8;6e5eocQrc
8Fl
lE'IEt:tg
IE
f*tsil:st ccls;135
I o(EI CLr.EFgr!
Ee
GI
;t/|g)D
.gt-
-4.(E 0.
O a):
flgi;8,o (!i
€sisRa
\JE.cl or:g c\Gotrq
-oc
l2Itlo;
I lr u.lt:i
ar \J
FI<l-2a,9:1'
><xxxxxxxxxxxxIL
G
"l5lvl6l
E
o
I
\
.o
z
;acd6F0a9c
Y(,vz6f
t!Jo- (,>()FO;a$
-,I<l
2l
2l
u,
UJzYo
F
l2
F
J
z
Ie[<
tslc
I
I
It:
l<
oltrl
ol
:il
t>lot-I<
l!r',5l<l
I
-l3il
uJ tlztl
-. >lo
rlJ
rutuz
a,F
u.l
J
z
ouJ(L r!ao o
l!o
oIY
IE
t!o
o
=F
r!
?/
tu
z
-t
J<oo.nt! uJ
-rO
or
N
xo
I r/l
q.,
L
T'
=tr:(J+J
NF\F\to
IF\c!
@
E/r. 'rt[<
>ado(J
-J
J(f
5P
T<oF1!=da
:F
5-#d5o
GJO<Ftro
uJ <
UJFgtzo()
Fouj
?o
oF?oi.o
C)
Fo
Fzo
C)
Izr()
u.l
=
=oJdr- lF
Ll.J -O OcL.l'(Jc
Ct 'F OZr- O.a:-. O- C +,JO_ .OFr.trq-clr-,. .- 1l'
cl:.F ur O_Ovr:nXt!(Jc(u
O.FO!n=(U
LJJ (, tE +)o<Lot! !F Irrl o. -o_ |
=E'.E 5 |(,)OOu I>-'' CJ F I
=sBE I
=,:'.,, IO .+. g) |J'Loc ,J<u .F JO+J t, =.:<fu-+J.}J.d Ll(Uotd
='-
-F {F-$Jl
ro
N
.o
s-
F
olt
.('
=ct
=
Je
J
"38o-ES-rOi
=5ilCOUJ>
ts
GIIF'o--.
bH
.E<zta<:Z#.G'
oFX
c'-!r
dt-
rftlH=fd=El&tl(Eol
i u.rl
=J^ |
J;Au
XJ.JYJ
L
'oJ0,
Cfl
)z
Lo
<l-Jl Dtrtr
I
:
€
t>< >< >.xx ><
tr8D
t
NSPPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE , JOB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION: MON
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr
tr
tr
tr
rl
GAS PIPING
B INSULATION
O SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
o
u FINAL FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
T] ROUGH B
E
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
ci rrruer O FINAL
E APPROVED
I
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
,t.
tffit
DATE INSPECTOR
oz
ts
=tul
o-
2
{'
a
l,LlIul!
tr
=t
uJo-
,/-/ ''/ '-- / / ),, -t ,l , /
/..','/-;': v ,1/ sll .)
l!.u
trt!o
z
6
utF
F
Fcz
o
zz
oltlFoz
oz
6J
dl
.O
oz
za)
-:- o c l+ot:6.Y, ||!
r ;€;E I;
EEg:i TIF
€ gE,g ia lE
ir*$i .lE
;E;iE " lE=
EtsF€ \:,f iEg";Ee€ lg?
o!Pov(EPoeo
€ E ='giP6,! 6 6iio F lioi Ei 6 p
:iEi;
E=c)(aE
e*it€
;ri;e
Efi E: A
iEgg i
\J
,:\)
N
N
Mt
(^\
lvtvj
I
N
IN
)c\\
\s\
Istt
r-
r)
N .Jc))
rr)
F\
rot'\
CJ
E
E,llJo-(,zo
=
-C)Iu
oz)
J
F
ut
tr
('z
=
oz
gJ
=
UJtuu-z
tr
utE
tr,lt
.0
3g
uJ
z
9,
uJ
o
o-
uJ
z
ul
x
F
IJJof,
tn
UJ
UJ
lJ-
ts
=t
uJ
o-
J
FoF
z
J
co
J
I
F(J
uJ)
IJ,J
z
J
C)z
UJ
=
NOtrvntv^
I
I
I=l>E.L
-rrotai r.r,r .t R=@<vfi
=r&
15zzt4-O OOU
F^AZq 5 >*EE"Pz >- (,itu89 ?b{ +e-I tsaq trd(\t0
z
E
{l!
o
uJ
F
E
UJ
z
Eoo
x
z
tr
UJ
=UJz
tltltltl
trz
z
L- Ulkoo<
=FR'rUo<z
aFz,.
9='iF
tro}EOI
ullJ
oulzY
iF
z
F
-(tz
J
?3
F
uJ
o
B
JI
tr
z
zl
.. >l
IJ
llJ
llJulz
=
I!
z
E z
Fa
J
[[]I l"lol<lf lo
l;,>oP
(:)
a*r
ut
tr
U)oo?zo
Fo-
uJY
uJo
oF
E
GLU.)O,--l
t! c"o-> -.:
Oa,oi
-..'i
Hur:^Fr!,zo
z
?,t =Z*.oo
=z
(L LL
..i5
=F==oi=uJXdil=
=
uJo.
o
ut
z
o
U)
o
cEo-
JFtu-h=
dr!>o-Ol!9o
\ l.lJ
x>Er-l
lJl
d)
o
co
Ecloo
Bt
.E
t
E
EoIJ
i\o
=lrlcoDEf=E
=t:o
-!
ts
=E
1lI
o-z9F()fEFv,
=o()
NDF
.lol
=.1olurltrl
JI
alilol
zl
=lolFI
?l(,l
IJJIEl
Jl
al>l
rrlol
zl
3l
9lFI
dl
5
itol
zl
3l
9l
I
I
I
I
I
cil
=.1oll|ll
5l
<l>l
tLlol
Zl ,,t3l -.r-ol t!FI F
5
1J
ca
+,
q-
r,:-(o
C5
ii
=z
o
nt
E
(f
(Y-)(,
I
(.:-)
F\
I
I
flttlol
zl
=lPI
+,()
+t
L
(,ozf-
=#)z
o
z
=I
uJ
=
o
t;\
=b2
Iu
T
d.
E
<F
r.! <zEUJF(42
9tv
F
LIJJ
J<(Ja?.3E
'6
a!tr!
rnJLctoNTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAILr,.'
JOB NAME
MON
i r ''' i
INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FBI :,,/, ii a! AM pMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr
tr
tr
tr
n
ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
rl
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL g FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
IIEGHANIGAL:
tr
tr
tr
n
HEATING
tr ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n
SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr-FINAL
,E APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
{:))f,-t,,):J
uJFo
d)oazo
Fo-
IJJY
llJo
F
tr
CEl|| o.)
^6.. ol
o
a@
Ooo=t-guJbkzo
z,"oz\cDo
=z
dP
ix
*r=-: i\ J-
B d'=il
ts
acul
o-
IL
IuJEO9zE<ctl€ue9
IJEae.Etr
=>: IJJ :-5 E=(,l;E =EE EbI \urE XO-E X>6=Fe-!'-iIri
uJ
d)
oF
---
ts
=Elrl
o-zIF(J
EFozoo
ntE
oz
ts
=g.
IJJ
o-
:E Fgg
Hx: e:
ees;E
(E0'-:-!; o U, tr
6Ei g€
EFigE
I
I=l>El,-
-rolNiureld
=oold
#
B9ZZu->o oo(gtr ^ 62-
E p
=EEZ7) gg
fl= 6oF3 3E-8 itn
F.NO
Jl<ltrl
zl
zl
.. >lo
IJJo
uJ
uJz
tr
Eul
o-
J
z
E
=c)
tnEo(.5
a,
+)
(tso
cc,El-.t'(5
il
=zo
-)
Io-
(d
ts
o
+,q)
=L.p
v,co(J
oth
c,!.oJ
=tr
I
I
I
I
.lol
=.1olull
5l
al>l
rLlq
zl
3lolFI
I
Iol
..1
olull
5t
il
zl
3lolFI
cil
IJJI
.El
-Jl
<l>l
a|.lol
zl
3tolFI
I
I
I
.l
OIzl
ol
:lil
3e
I
ILl'
I
IUIul
cl
3=
trOOZF
=<ZE
fF
dzo
o
EFz
F
C)
uJ
E-
-rO<FlrOuJ<ztr
LTJ F.42oo
(.b
=F=o
()
Dn!
oz
E
=G,
lLj&
I
$
0I
$.
I^
(n
UJ
UJlt
L
=ul
@uj
F
z
z
J
€
z
z
(r
UJz]
u,lI
z
rt
ujo
2r
II
Fz
ac
UJz
3
ul(E
fF
o
c,
()
(!
\.
\o):E.
o
o
cnc
==(D
E
o'-
l
o
o
3't
o
(5
I
o
N
,>
EFl
c'l
;
o
:J
ttt
.9c
:=
!;
3(u
c(u
oc
o
3
t-
(u
3
E
o
o
a
lfc
c
'-
E
;
-c
3
E
o
io
:ti
;o.-o
:sEiha.: c)cr'- (to(u€o(D
=Eg'5
cP
?rd6'=It(E
'!:o(gar
'-o
(g
c)6
(6C
-a60
gO
\J, (l'E:;3odt
i< --o'-(gD
>9.oo)(D;
L=9Er-o
-(,
p
9
t\
vl
{
Y]
ry
a
I
\
\I
e\U
a
0
Cr
\
U
\
\
\
(^
(
lr9
c(
L
=
uJo-
z
!
o
Y(Jlu
oz
d
-9G
()
qJ
uJ
oz6
=
J
9z
UJ
=
u.lulu.z
9
F
ul(r
uJE
=g
u.l
z
tr.t
F6oo-
llJo
o-lz
uJ
o
x
F
uJ
U'
u)
UJt!u-F
ul.L
J
FoF
z
o
(o
9E
Fou,
ul
o
=
o-
9z
UJ
=
\
NOr].VntVA
i
i
(
$
(
\
I
-'
oB
Z|,J,-ooAz>9
G()
UJo
UJz
UJ(,
ol
=>E
-I
z
=i. aL
FY661>(-' (J<)z(r-<
v=
o- !.4
FO.ini
z
tr
cc
lu
t-
c
lr,l
e.
z
Eoo
Tz
9
F
IJJ
3
uJz
lltltltl
tszlzOa
E IJJ<oo<
=PHt!5o<z
tz ..
24"iFdo3trOI
uJ| If I Ijt
I<t I?t I"ll
-ll
et \ot I
Ft It>f-FrrJt Io-L I>t I'll
ll,ll
o
3
zl
.- >loulo
lll
UJz
(nF
(r
llJ
o-
J
z
E
o
zz
F
T
Ol I q
<t I ait 5 | i
2t 3 | ;oo
cc
t--f+
-t
-)
UJt-
U)
o-'
zo
F(L
uJY
UJct
oF
L
=(r
uJ(L
u-o
(L
oo
I
HurirF
z
.n9>_i(Do
=z
a.,g
ifi
|ra:i(Ji
=
tll ;dd=
DND
L
tr
:.v!E:E<afaulG2BgE' iI
cd
-!E ;t5 h=o dtr: >.L:ot!E 909 5 tr.tEXIf x>o=F
!D _':'lt ,.=
ut
F
F lb
= l:E. l-uJ r-
o-zIFo3El-cn'z,o.ors
\ v/ilE=
'Y1J3
=
i
I
I
z
tr
c$
$
\n
$
$
*
\i
r;
=z
(D
I
I
t_t.!lo-
I
I
)
fr
B{J
EO
I
I
OI
=.1(9l
u.tlcrl
il>l
u-lolzl
3lolFI
olzl
cilull
14
J
:lolFI
ll
td
i:lEol(!I FI
I
I
I
I
I'l
bizl
utl
1l
at>l
rLlol
zl3olH
I
I
I
I
I
I
cil
z.l
uJlEIJl
<l>l
u-lolzl ..:3t 5Ol uJFI F
UJF'r
G
--r O<F
uJ<ZG|.UF(42o
J
d.
F
LU)z
C)
z
'r
(J
tl-J
=
=
Oz
J<()(, ?.3o'
nnD
Proiect Application
Project Name:
Project Description;
Contact P€rson and Phone / t/"FS€
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Desc.iption: Lot Block Filing Zone
-Commenls:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPHOVAL
L
,:::164ilO t'(
:-';q() To S
,, ., ,;1,.r.
ci2
E
=E
IJJo-
oo
(f)
<\l
otr)
r-l
buc
:J-o()
r''
kl{
,{
U'
uJ
UJ
lJ-
E
=Elu
o-
- )|e - al q"St
b \t-,te j*?fS I
I
I
ss
ei
I
/'{
ls
T\v
Nt
I
l_
,Ft<to
I
I
l.
Ite.
tbz
IE
l2
@ulF
z
o2
=)o
.6
oz
t!J
IUo
i
tot!
toFo
Fz
o
c
.9
E.glcE
ii -c
8fi
eG;o'64't o.€o-oc;B
3F
EE
cD-CO
ot-c
o
!tcE
q,Eoo
ct!c
=o
E
o
=l
d
c,
o
CL
CLr!
3
.9
o
o
6
oo
6ooo
(!
€
o
=oF
a!
E
'=
-o
cL ot.,.9-p.E6
CO6(J'E|!
9orFL
96.s:ooE.s
-Ct'ip
.:.5o.oEoo€oEotr
-Go-
Qt lt:'6'g
o
EE5Esb-oc.9
.- rtEEE'.
EFcL'- <t,(ro€o
=€.j';cP'- o.
-iCo.9
E(!otr
'FOcc
eeEi
o(E
sF
Eg
-(BE6oroLc
O(Eie-c6
-E60
oglr, (E
ot:8o6CetF60>gllo9a
OEr-o
-o
oo
(Ost
oo
rosf
E
=EqJ
o-
z6J
:f,o
I
tu
z.
Jo-
otFo
UJ
tr
(,z
ao
=:)Jo.
9z
out
=
tuu,
z
9F
luE
C)
u.lg,
ao
=uJt
UJ
G,z
6uto
Eatoo.ur
o-
z
UJJo
x
F
UJ
<tt
(n
IJJ
UJ,t!(F.
t
UJo
J
El-
oz
-J
J
I
F
uJ
uJ
oz
(ot
J
J
=
C)
uJ
=
\
{s
NO[Vn'lVA
.ll\l
I5,- |
s ivl
=fDNl
JEa9IZ Z tLFo o o>
5;
=;E., O c(lz>o89 ^$*b{ :<Eg g
r(\l(,
zo
F
J
E
c,
ui
F
oo(f)(\I
uJ
a
J
z
Eo
z
9F
e,
UJF
3
UJz
tltl) | l
F
= .^2_=7
=
FBgIE
=gE58ed?<aoofrlltl||rl.^ v,t -- !a.5 = E99 3=d.g[=gE
oo()-z
zIF
5.ttz
UJ
?
F
u.l
o
ii
IJJJ
uJ
3
J
uJzx
s2IF
(D
Id.
uJc
q=b
il9
L
-c
o?zo
Fo-
IJJY
uJo
oF
F
=G
IJJ
0.
t!o
HHzo
z
o9z4dto
=z=))dg
;Ei
dd=
tr
Eulo-
tl-
EE2ZE<ol€EB9EL
EEt>E dEE FE
= >o-i 8bE irE ;E6. ulolI'E
IIJ
dt
oF
I--
F
=^Elrl
o-zIFo3EFazo()
:
tfc
=.1ol
IIJI
:l
<l>l
:l
PI
d
ql
5l
|rIol
zl
3tolFI
(5
=It
o-c
<uo!ct
U''(to(5
(u
.tJ
r,l-o
(l,g
L
nt
ii
=z
c)
=.1ol
ootno
(o
.Yo(l)
=tr
=.1ol
IJJI
5l
al>l
I
I
I
I
I
el
cilurlEl
JI
<l>l
t!lol
=l
sol utFI F
OOz, l-
=f--"6
O
G,
<F(r()r!<zFLII F(42o(J
J
EF(-)
ulJ
UJ
z
I
L!
t-E ir
=*Eo2
!!!
FS-.rl
\+
fO I tr'
tE 3;
U'!u
LUl!
E
=G
UJ
o-
qt
EgEE
.;{,-i .c
8X
aE6s'64't o-E6ttc
aEsF
FEg;
C.too,NO
ffi
PE
E€oo3o6cD
o.S
=t,
!E
aoE,b'-=
ol
=rJ.6 9.eg
tt o.tr6
"3stg
EE
'ri: g
O?: G
'=g,(,'
g8E
cogt.9; 3E9cc.= ag
€sE
:eEc96'- ot
ESE
E E-E500
E*fl*Er"
cEi
E6:geE
g E-6
EEF- o,.urrC6 0'-!= oe-E
gEi
S Ilo
H{E
-b; e
lo -o. oEEE50cD
-o6
o
UJl!t!
ts
=|r
uJ
o-
Fot-
;Eo;ttozo
a-
EIuloJ
E.lllz
uJ
=E
-|'tur$
EN
z9a93=90
o
z
ct
=
-..,
=
z
trc)
2
o
lllo-
F
z2=EEf8
FFg8a.zof
lr. .g3 EgI =d: EHOUJO0()lz
z9F
Ee
=8OE(,crid
tq
s-l-2L
=24
=id{
=qo(,
zIF
Jf(hz
I
I
I
.lol
e
uJl
5l
<l>l
!l
3lolFI
ctz
ci
uJE
J
a
ltoz3oP
I
I
I
>l
CEl
Jl
>l
bl
=l
sC,l lrlHF
t
n
5
g
I,Ir,rUiG
t:
t:{
!I
I
o
4
uJc
ct
ou,G
!
t!o
zl
3lolFI
t).a/}.l)
u;
=zoo
c
-rO<FGOLu<zg.t!FL,Zoc)
JC<oC)F
=oif;FazEoc)
E
2P
s33Fd8
q)
oF
t
Fzo
z
T
I.IJ
=
J<c)og.3H
NJFl
"{o(3
o
=E
=GluG
-'o
Fo-ulY
u,
oF
F
=TE
IJJtl-
!uF
o
I
uJFoz
z
oPze
60
=zde
J
EEi
AHE
=Eul
o-tto
EgE<c)€ua9tra
E5ttr:Jr-E H=c,rr{rYo dtr: =oE 8t9 lurE XO-E HTa -.1!r
UJEoF
EI
-a:-D
F
EElrl+zIF(JfEF0zoo
trtrD
?at
t
tr!n
75 south trontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 oftlce of communlly development
October 6, L987
Mr. Jay Peterson
Box 3l-49VaiI, Colorado 8L658
Re: Garden of the cods Special Development District pECSubnittal
Dear Jay:
The staff reviewed the subnittal for the Garden of the Godsproject. The folJ.owing inforrnation should be subrnitted byOctober 21st to our office:
l-. Documentation of the parking arrangement for the spacesthat are located to the east of VaiI Valley Drive.
2. A survey for the property.
3. Existing floor plans and elevations
4. A height analysis
please feel free to call me.to review this project at
4 - wG - l^Jc. ,.n .,r.1
o.r.r urrtr*ce Q. \U.
If you have any further questions,At this tine, the staff is planningthe PEC rneeting on November 9th.
Sincerely,
4(*f^hh-\*g. q...\.-.- e-
\\]Sl"' S\u.!l'Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP: br
I1u.Jr/,r ;.-,<i:-
::i'nr33*6":
;r.:l'.*lts:.x*
,^r\r.\ ,^re o.^rc \Lr L,.* 0.-|\e r-c*c.scA GFFA.- !.*k P.r^""
i:: 3;vFrco
<a!,lZ;rii3.
:<9 <li:w
ll!lr<F1<:
-i:"?
< :. : z FIFF<{,Fl,. z
I
I
l_
,Ft<t6
I
I
I
I
I,
IFt<(e,rFto2
t=lo
tz
J
Eulzuro
Y
=Zv-
6z;o
to
J++L]
1
I
I
I
o
=t-
=G
uJo-
oz
F
IJJ-)o
I
zoz
,rPzeoo
=zd9
,"iE
=E==oi-u1 E6il=
tr
=t
IJJ
o-
lto
uJc
F
co
EILoEg
'E
=E
E
8
f\o
=) |,t=5>Ef=E
=8:o
-E
E
=Elrl
o-zoFo
EF(nzoo
DNE
UJF
6
|l
tltltlll
lmltcltal<l>t llo.l <lEt >l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-l
uJlclolol<lJI
<l
>l
I
I
I
I
lolorl-lxlol6l
IIA
U)|u4
ol<l
J
E
!
U'go(J
c,taol-
,ttJ
Ec
II
.o
=(-)
artEo(5
o)
+,
q-o
o
!|!(5
ui
=z
-)
tr6
=+EFFo2
z
T
O
IIJ
=
oozts-
=fJZrr- o
J
=FOulJ
F
uJ
=
E
-.r O<FEC)
r,u <ztt!F
( r,l z
'6
at
€
t
ntrn
rNsilhiroN \
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
TOWN OF
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MoN @ WED THUR FRI ____@ PM
BUILDING:PLUMBlNG:
FOOTINGS / STEEL tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
n
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
E
tr
tr
tr
n
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
GAS PIPING
NAIL POOL / H. TUB
f r^^t --------.O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
LJ
D
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH E
o
n
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
"FK O FINAL
\PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
D^rE /2-?*-'? rNsPEcro
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
@ WED THUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUTTIBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W,V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
n
FRAMING tr
tr
tr
n
ROUGH / WATER
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
GAS PIPING
NAIL POOL / H. TUB
d ,,*o.tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr
B
CONDUIT o
tr
SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL ,4 O FINAL .4
,'-furtsnepRovEDtr APPROVED TION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
.rrtl'
l'3
DArE //- /A - f/ rNSpEcroR
DATE
t
JOB NAME
rINSPECTION,' TOWN OFn /1 | \.'',' ll /1 /:
4 P , */t -t/ -4.-
REOUESf
VAIL
-----q)INSPECTION:
CALLER
MoN (fuEF WED THUR FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr BOUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION E GAS PIPING
E POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER
MECHANIGAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
tr
BOUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr} SUPPLY AIR
tr
NAL N FINAL
tr SHEET
E FINAL
' (,y|'aeeaoveo
.. CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIBED
INSPECTOR
:
F:
F
5cz
j
B
2
t-
F
z
7
3
F
-t
Ft
:r;
<r:
x^i,;:<
t^ rL
7.= -xFF
:<U|,2.
c><c
z
zz
o
Fqz
o
z
I
I
I
I
I
t!J
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.,
to
It!-rx
tvt(5tzr6
r5
(n
UJ
uJ
L
=G
LIJ
=
d
z
o
)
0c
z;
l
o-
9z
I
E
uJ
z
tr
o
B
!g
z
6
uJ
-ano
uJ
(L
2
uJ
o
tn
uJulu-
F
=
u.l
.J
F
-
z
o
F
uJJ
o
o
=l
cD
E
UJ
tlJ
z
=
NO[VntvA
UJ
F
t-
o
z
E
F
=:
uJ
z
()
o,
..,J
$l
S
RI
<t
tsI
H
rl-l
.rJ Iel
Y
-ZZr!-
tr ^ 6z9 A tod o 6F
@o(tsz>-ooo!?QzXr!<oq {
i6 s
i-.)-t!dN(,
- :r .Yt
zo
:
G
ao-
UJx
z
;-o
z
tr
r!
r.tl
F
?
2Z
<EAe6 f
-EE!',P,> s;68o==Jr!PSEPdgSi"2
COEro2:
a?zaGaz3 l rU$,:9zd;
J<=+crgEE g5:
ooorzQ
Fz
z
tr
oo
()
O
zo*
.Jf
<hz
z
-
F
o
q4.3'R)t-X
lLl
oz
E
=ul
z
F
tI,'1og.
(L
UJF
o
aOz.{
I(i
ItJ,
i
z
j
I
:<
.J
co
F
(o
)v
x
,,)<\,!
\s
s
,b
eR\I
6
ui:.(
in
(.)
\]A.o1\l
AI
;
$l
?,1n,*
9
d\
aj\
u
ll
.Jct
T.
o-
\)\.\J
t:cir
goa
o-
t:(-)
R\I
?q
$
s.<
c(ii
\^
'tI
E
o
c'o
q
F:t-
:L
o-
{
s
I (!
cr.oo
nF
I
o-
,_:g
a
c)
cl
a
Io
t-:(::
cco
I(!
:-al
i.o
c)
-:.t
f:o
L:
tr
LLIz
tIJt:
:c
O
o:.
E.
<FO:(Jur<
7- tx
LU l_-'-o
t)
-J C:<oI (JF
I :<
l-,, r-)t-* ;_ilv \J
E
zt-;i(J
)*-:<
(J
<;qtr
e1
ct
,' tr.
(,i
J
'.. Ci
U
z
z(,9
4ZcoO
=z
O- t!
z;.
J\J
@Ur
E
q)
:>
o r-L
3dt:>
CL
.U
F
H
TJ,JLzo
FO
F-az,
O
L)
nL,l
t-jr
L!
_slL:_
-e' o'c: --
* +n"** t/rtv,
EYf gtt^t& c*)ca4'lE
7 ,y'
\
t)tao
who will be invjted-to bid on the project. Davjd Kanally commented that the fifteenpercent cap may exclude some of the competition. A vote was taken and the rtionpassed unanimously 7-0.
The next item was 0rdinance No. 40, series of 19g7, first reading, regarding arequest to rezone the Garden of the Gods_Il.ttb from public accommoiatjin zoning to aspecialdeveiopmentMlewas.biauvMayorJohnston.tristan
Pritz stated what changes would be made to the Garden of the Gods Club, the neasonswhy a special deveiopment district was being requested, and why staff recorrenAeaapproval contingent upon three condjt.ions:
. 1. The app'l jcant shal'l provide written, 1ega1 documentation of the Garden ofthe Gods'right to use the parking spaces on ihe last side of the vait vitiey-oriu"on a parcel called P-2. Staff must have written documentation as we] 'l as anattached map to scale showing the area of the P-2 parcel whjch is attocatea to theGarden of the Gods. This agreement must also be approved by the other members ofthe P-2 Condominium Association. This document must be submitted and approved bythe staff before the project proceeds to second reading of the ordinance'.
2. The applicant must submit a revised employee housing agreement with afloor plan that clearly indicates the location, iypL of unit,-and square footage ofthe employee housing units. This information musl be submitted and approvea ti ttreowner and Town of Vail before second read.i ng of the ordjnance.
. 3. The applicant shall submit a written statement agreeing to restrict perthe Subdjvis'i on Rental Restriction, Section L7.26.075, 6 lock-ofi accommodationunits, 10 free-standing accommodation units and one dwelling unit as indjcated onthe PEC plans. This wri tten agreement shall be submitted and approved by staffbefore the second reading of the SDD ordjnance.
she noted changes in the ianguage on page 3, Item 5 Density. she also stated the
PEC-recommended approval 4-0, wjth one abstentjon. Jay Peierson, representing theapplicant, gave additjonal expianation as to what the ipplicant was trying to do andthe upgrades that would be made. After he answered queriions from Councii, KentRose made a motion to approve the ordinance with the wording changes, ana goraon
Pierce seconded. A vote was taken and the motjon passed 6-0, with piul Johnstonabstaining.
The seventh order of business was the Amphitheatre lease agreement between the Townof Vail and Vail Valley Foundation. T-ar-ry-fs6iil-stated ihat at the Work Sess.ionearlier that day, some language had been changed and a paragraph 28 had been added.John Slevjn stated he would like a shorter leise period or levelop a review.yit.tfor the lease term. Tom Steinberg stated his concerns about the term of the leaseand how one sided the agreement was. He suggested language change to have a way outno matter if it costs the_Town. Brad Quayle agreed ttrit itre Towi was giving it awayand they better be sure of what they're gLtting and they must have an is.api valve.During this time Hermann Staufer stepped out for a momeit. John Slevin made amotion to table the agreement until the next Evening Meeting, and Eric Affeldtseconded. A vote was taken and the motjon passed 6:0.
Under Cjtjzen Participation, Mayor Paul Johnston stated he had enjoyed working willeveryone. Dan Corcoran comnented he had enjoyed working with Pauj lnd HermannStaufer, too.
under-the Town Manager's Report, Ron phillips stated there would be anorganizationa'l meeting of the Council at the next Work Session Tuesday, November 24,2:00 p.m. He then stated it had been a real privilege working with Plul and Hermann
over the last few years, and congratulated Gail, Keni, Tom and Merv on thejrelection.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m.
Respectful 1y submi tted,