The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 LOT B HOLIDAY HOUSE AKA 9 VAIL ROAD 2000 - 2008-1 LEGALlu /,7,@ ' fT*g ! hat' 16 //"4:/r4 /iot" a(a- Ehfu,ftolJaa-W sir*^*a!r€tRop|sff ilasign Reyiew Soard ACTIOT{ FORI{ g€partrnent of CommlJfi lty DevelsBme$t f5 Sou$ Frontage Roedn Vlil. cslorads 8163? tsl: 970.479.2119 fax: 941.479.245? wEb: wwtr.vailgsv"csm Project Name: HOLIDAY HOUSE (9 VAIL ROAD) Project Description: REVISE LANDSCAPE PLANS Participants: OWNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 06/05/2008 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 9003s APPUCANT NEDBO CONSTRUCTION P,O. BOX 3419 VAIL co 81658 License: 251-A CONTMCTOR N EDBO CONSTRUCTION DRB Number: DRB080197 06/05/2008 Phone: 970-845-1001 06/05i2008 Phone: 970-845-1001 Location: 9 VAIL ROAD HOUDAY HOUSE Pruject Address: Legal Description: Parcel Number: Comments: P.O. BOX 3419 VAIL co 81658 License: 251-A 9 VAIL RD VAIL Lot 9-B Block: Subdivision: 2101-071-0600-1 Mouon By: Second By: Votei Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION ACtiON: STAFFAPP Date of Approval: 06/11/2008 Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 (PIAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3: APPEALS. Cond: 202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $2O.OO g6/08/2448 . .i ,, rl, . 9794765863 1:20Pil1 PAGE OLPiA4:16c., 21lg PTARMIGAI.I MA.IAGEMENT [; :402 ffi Addltlons-Racfdenttat o r Commcrclal +prication noibedsn Revtew rtCt oagr|rnont ct ccrimunity D.^ctcamert 75 Sa.clr Fonbgc noil, Vrll, Coloodo 8l6j7' Ur 9m.179,ZtZE lrr,! r703n}452 Il|*l rftvrv. YilEov.@n C.n nl tnfonnrdonl ll9rqE- T$ltlnt cdln rwlaw murt trcrlrn rpprorrl Drtor to rLorntung ! bulldhg'p.nrt lpp,fcaion. ptorEo rcfar trht tubfiftlrl lqdtcmmb for Sro prft'nJu rmovrt tilt E rrqucstld. -An rpplcioon rtr LU+en tvro, dniot reaprd. unul.r! rrquirrd Inbrmlton l! ,rcfh.d 'Uf Uc cornrnunli mcrcprnrni'Ci'p.rtrncni m $ojoct mDy rbo nrrdto F rwlg*ld by trr Town Coundt Ind/or fr pnhtng rnl :nvircfuntrl Onlltle*h. IrotF ;,il ail;;ll.g;;unlr t lulldlng ptmlt tr hurd ril conrttcuir conrnrrrcr ir*rt onl vrry ir Cirpporrr,. tecrEm of thr Proporef r Lotr-Elockr_ suwtwon: &rc,e/ r4o-olE Phyrlol Add?C||t F{lt(|dfla,! dld/4?/a G@ /.-2K?J)'i4,ErgtcCa, AcsersorEt 970-328.E6.t0 tof P!rc!' no.)t' xcrrrkqla lQ,t ,. ihno(r)of Qwnrr(r)r ' 'r(- Haru / t&.- rA {......--. ..- xrllnrAdAu: own.l(f) glgn|h|rr(r): ilrnc of Appllcrntt l.lrlllng Addrt|ft Phonr: ?yp. ot Rcvlrw rnd F.ti D Sieng tr ConaFrtl t.vlaw O ilcar CoortnrciooD A!tsIUo E MlrprAlbrtion (muli-hnrty/commcrdd) D Mlnor Alt$auon (ftd|.rlntV/duptcy) f50 llr 11,00 Dct rqurri fd of t?nl lgn rtu. No fur t650 Ftr srfirucflon of ! na|^/ bullolng or dtmo/EDrJll6,f300 For rn rdiltlon whFr! rq$r! loobga I tftLd to rny rclldcntirl or otnm€hl Mlldnt (lr#ud.t 150 rddllonr !. lnorior con\€ftlonr). 1250 l0r m[Dl. chrnglr t0 Dulttlngt tM dtr inp|oirrmfr, fr]dt tt, rFnoilng, prh{4, wlrCew rddEonl, irndsctphg, ldrrr 1nd Ebhloo wrlb, nc.t20 Fix mlflor olangcr a buildlngs rnd sltr lrnpmvcmmur 4fh u, ronrofirg, pclning, wlndovr dCilgn& trnd*ephg, 'lrtcer rnc clehing wrlb, ec. I( Ctelr96 boAg/e\,rC pbnt For tlulot6 !o plmr rL!.dy lppovrd i Pbnnln! Strlt or dle Dostn n.\rc|r Dottd.tr SrprnHon RrQurn s20 l,lc Fra f-r @ J g TLoz =oF] €.€,etcl ljto .=.3 ( '- ^tb-MlL w Receipt funds to: Name: Nt)*r-4.^rln *^ r^2. Maifing Address: ?o Bry 34tQ!ill ,r't 8tLi8 Legal Subdivision: Address: Developer: Permit Number f16ry - 600|7 Proieci Number. ,4/1+ PRa d6:oQt2.Project Number:___: lmprovement Completion Date: l;nX?- THfS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this L,H day ot /l/n[F*aKEK. ,zOOn. byand among /U€t2tsA (oil.\T/aJena'u i;K:. (the 'Deveioper"), and the Town of Vail (the "Town"). WHEREAS.the Developer,of approval of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for (address, legal description, and project number) wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the judgement of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certain improvements set forth in the attached estimated bid(s) in accordance with the approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of this Agreement, including completion of the all improvements refened to in this Agreement, by means of the following: The Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in the amount of $ 3?. {ad,od as collateral for thecomp|etio-nofa||improvements@ment'intheeventthereisa default under this Agreement by the Developer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows: 1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to furnish all equipment and materials necessary to perform and complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement. The Devefoper agrees to complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement on or before tne Lsr dayof futl ,nAt. The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all improvements refened to in this Agreement, in accordance with all approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail, and to do all work incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following: a. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and to the satisfaction of, the Town Planner, the fown Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or service districts, as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\Adminislrative_Actions\DlA cash formatj-1a2007.doc Page 1 of 5 complete until approved and accepted as completed by the Community Development Department and Public Works Department of the Town of Vail.2. To secure and guarantee performance of the obligations as set forth herein, the Developer agrees to provide collateral as follows: A cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in the amount of $ 32,,too-Oo as collateral for the completion of all improvements referred to in lhis Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer. 3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth above for another form of security or collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful completion of those improvements refened to herein in this Agreement and the performance of the terms of this Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative security or collateral shall be at the Town's sole discretion. 4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the sarhe, nor shall the Town, nor any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the nature of said work, but all of said liabilities shall be and are hereby assumed by the Developer. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such losses, claims, damages,or liabilities (or actions in respect thereoQ arise out of or are based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in connection with investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action. This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer rhy have. 5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply for and the Town may authorize a partial release of the collateral deposited -wii6 ine Town for each iategory of improvement after the subject improvement is constructed in compliance with all plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no condition shall the dollar amount of the collateral that is being held by the Town be reduced below the dollar amount necessary to complete all uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement. 6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements referred to in this Agreement are not constructed in compliance with the approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail or not accepted by the Town as complete on or before the date set forth in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement, the Town may, but shall not be required to, draw upon the security reiened to in this Agreement and complete the uncompleted improvements refened to in this Agreement. Pursuant to Section 12-11-8, Vail Town Code, the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy referred to in this Agreement may be revoked until all improvements referred to herein are completed by the Developer or the Town in accordance with this Agreement. Flcdev\FORMS\Pemits\Planning\Administrativa_Actions\DlA cash format 5-16-2007.doc Page 2 of 5 t Dated the day and year first above written. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF EAGLE The foregoing D_eyeloper lpprovement Agreement'} Day of M00yy-tl>h, , 2o&by _ Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires Town Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss.coUNTYoFEAGLE ) The foregoing Developer lmprovement Agreement was acknowledged before pe this 14 Diy o1 Uc'rr.<-zHt'-.,"-,2o@oy -8..."--,.--^-t> C<-<r\S<--,^. \Mtness my hand and ofilcial seal. My commission expires: --=D .--'{^--,- -> C-otcL'-'- Notary Public F:bdev\FoRMS\Pemits\Planning\Administrative_Aclions\DlA cash format_F16-2007.doc Page 4 of 5 ' '+ lf the costs of completing the uncompleted improvements refened to in this Agreement exceed the dollar amount of the deposit, the excess, together with interest at twelve percent (12o/o) per annum, shall be a lien against the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf the Developer fails or refuses to complete the improvements referred to in this Agreement, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations), of the Vail Town Code, and the Developer shall be subject to penalties pursuant to Section 12-3-10 (Violations: Penalties) and Chapter 14 (General Penalty), of the Vail Town Code. 7. The Developer shall warranty the work and materials of all improvements referred to in this Agreement located on Town property or within a Town right-of-way, pursuant to Chapter 8-3, of the Vail Town Code, for a period of two years after the Town's acceptance of said .improvements. Flcdev\FORMS\Pemits\Planning\Administrative_Adions\DlA cash format_5-1&2O07.doc Page 3 of 5 ATTACHED COPIES OF THE ESTIMATED BID{S} F:\odev\FoRMs\Permits\Planning\Administrative_Actions\DlA cash tormat-5-16-2007.d0c Page 5 of 5 avvl' lr lvlllF ' JrIJ J-1 .rErrl rufEia:rr:N0, lq+y r, f.c ##PV &L ft( ttAs Upp.r Crugt Landscapingl Jnc, PastffieaBcr geg Ayptun r fulotada 81632 97 o-52u8[50 t gT0-52a.DEj1 fax w t3,2oo7 Ncdbo tVtilM V![ViltlgEZrflhg'goucrMac;D*cd 6/tt/7 Loadrcqp ph L-l lDcfrfu I-2 sEcnoN A. nHoAnoil 8YrltM. tOB DE8CRIFIIOIII fit, Udcrground rslor1dd rygtssr wlttr pop up bcodr ccttldng tllc rulcc ccdl of md (Raiu Bid 1104) d psnsnhl *& mA gpitrdcowf $fdEn (Ilda Eid 180_5 e lt12) ({,959 rq $. TY1p &|p EDto *'icalwltt *46 th !r4& oftccr 66d rbrubf out*b of pop pp er. tfpitr Gtsr l^caAresghg hs wlll nrypf ^tn cqapl oloc& r'rd codttglor't idntara rpnlir't"t ax pot * ry c i,ldlc tooai|ii c@ollcrfiout8rb Binf Toro, Ilgerbl &d ftlu win * ruct ity*rn r+ro nf h b bbun orn wi6 oorpa$ & (s,futcriad) arcry t[ !o prcrE* lic hs Gcnl cotrdor or o*lcr b tt4oldlc for ud{cddhg t ftrn, opphtug rgd -4rtfrg bcldow prarudor, tuuilrc rcduglll, !!cisl|, dsy{grt l;0' dhrercr ptpc qlla rourr! rtfh rillt ftiht ol cod, ponrr to cloclr' foirrlt rlect/Et rdrr &trrowry rad dlcuiler rad udlity bcde fioa hour to rfiscl. srn'Jlll, ID, Z[ltJ/u I:lof[/lJ|E{ tfiJst tJ+utrp-lfE-3Ei-Dc5i I rJ.9..tr,r;tf | > r.?rufEcrvyr:fi0. l++y r, [,5- U.CUprge?ofl Ncdbo/evdl 7ny07 EESNONE. IIWDTCAIIHG. JOB DXSCXDTION #1, t utdqitglid ttgfu !ftr rll lroldlt, gtrr rl oonfiuo.t'pn rprrc E_lttqq dchh twrrcd oa 6u& grdo-ra rop"lry.rAEfuc ;qt r- Eoutdcrpn0etrrE rgl ptrnr artaid.curylrriry ar! nor ucnlud t co*. fuc ri u rltuH to FI!tr$'itf,coqo_tt Elod hlo b#I tic! aqEh l, Cccp nta wood dtpr, Fh, gndl rcd ure riC It$*d: heprn prmard grdar nrur conpon iroo tro or ;ti, pr- F;rdrrr rIE ErurEh.t" r+ftr[ T'ooal chlpr, Iortdl_rtcol dsfogbEhylcaphorrog hdr rd Bh$ dcrr, Apety trglrlfrcrAlladabL ro ed[zsd. gir. almrd-ot![ lgiclr actsir. Mrtrild . Spnna 8enrc6 lryro Apcn Alpco Ftancrausurpb Dogiurood Pc!&gcohcutcr Floebcl4ircr UtrI fEbs fhcr Wbitonontbcrry L{ufo doo Gbbrrpuco Pcrsulrlnix Pcnanlrhnix/grouodcour Fadliz.tr god $oat c{gngs'ftpkrticcry Conpoil Wood chlpr COE?I Slfr9gl.00 MANEnIALLIBT gln 12il 15fi 2,0'dlro 2J'dhn 3.0r'dhn 7tFlt$l 5sd 5gd 3 grl 5Fl 5rd 5sd rgd 225rdbn lrrornl I 2 4 5 5 It 2I 21 u 6 3 300 4t0 15lV 2,000qft 230ht 20 mydr 26 oydr /+r- Kn^rl,,l 4t ,.[^l' bd 6/s/a THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered ilto tnis lflryday ot Qfcf Pyg-O among {l/En(o /o.4/ir.,2.,,:rp-1/7.?c (the "Developef), CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT o Qr*l*.Legal Subdivision: Address: Developer: Permit Number: Proiect Number: lmprovement Com pletion Date: DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT and the . t' n-.*t$c6,'.txYke ul'rl4 Iock (J-' Receipt Name: Mailing ,200v, Town of Vail (the "Town'). WHEREAS, the as a condition of approval of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for /L /80/u/Jlu-v (address, legal description, and project number) wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the judgement of the Town to make redsonable provisions for completion of certain improvements set forth in the attached estimated bid(s) in accordance with the approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of this Agreement, including completion of the all improvements referred to in this Agreement, by means of the following: The Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in tie amount ot $ J .frfrOOrb0 as collateral for the completion of all improvements referrdd to in this Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows: 1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to furnish all equipment and materials necessary to perform and complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement. The day of ,20on. The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all improveffients/referred to in this Agreement, in accordance with all approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail, and to do all work incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following: a. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and to the satisfaction of, the Town Planner, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or service districts, as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed Flcdev\FORMS\Pemib\Planning\Administrative-Actions\DlA cash format-5.1S2007.doc Page 1 ot 5 complete until approved and accepted as completed by the community Development Department and Public Works Department of the Town of Vail. 2. To secure and guarantee performance of the obligations as set forth herein, the Developer agrees to provide collateral as follows: A cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in the amount of S A5,0@'Oo as collateral for the completion of all improvements referred to in this Agreement, in the event there is a defauli under this Agreemeni by the Developer. 3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth above for another form of security or-collateial acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful completion of those improvements referred to herein in this Agreement and the performance of the ierms of this Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative security or collateral shall be at the Town's sole discretion. 4- The Town shall not, nor shall any offlcer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accidenl, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the sarhe, nor shall the Town, nor any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injurgd by reason of the nature of said work, but all of said liabilities shall be and are hereby assumed by the Developer. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the Town or any of its omcirs, agenti or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon any performance by ihe Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse the Town for any-and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in connection with investigating oidefending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action. This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer my have. 5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply for and the Town may authorize a partial relea6e of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category of improvement .afier the subject improvement is constructed in compliance with all plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no condition shall the dollar amount of the collateral that is being held by the Town be reduced below the dollar amount necessary to complete all uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement. 6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements refened to in this Agreement are not constructed in compliance with the approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Tovvn of Vail or not accepted by the Town as complete on or before the date set forth in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement, the Towr may, but shall not be required to, draw upon the security refened to in this Agreement and complete the uncompleted improvements refened to in this Agreement. PupuSlt to Section 12-11-8, Vail Town Code, the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy referred to in this Agreement may be revoked until all improvements referred to herein are completed by the Developer or the Town in accordance with this Agreement. F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\qdministrative-Actlons\Dl,A cash format-s-16'2007'doc Page 2 of 5 lf the costs of completing the uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement exceed the dollar amount of the deposit, the excess, together with interest at twelve percent (12o/o) per annum, shall be a lien against the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf the Developer fails or refuses to complete the improvements referred to in this Agreement, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations), of the Vail Town Code, and the Developer shall be subject to penalties pursuant to Section 12-3-10 (Violations: Penalties) and Chapter 1-4 (General Penalty), of the VailTown Code. 7. The Developer shall warranty the work and materials of all improvements referred to in this Agreement located on Town property or within a Town right-of-way, pursuant to Chapter 8-3, of the Vail Town Code, for a period of two years after the Town's acceptance of said improvements. 8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from time to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto. F:\cdev\FoRMS\Pemits\Planning\Administrative_Actions\DlA cash format_S-1A,ZOO7.doc Page 3 of 5 Dated the day and year first above written. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF EAGLE ss. 'jgBXXl?wowilqy:^"";tEt*tri*T-f"€p:lz:'* Witness my hand and official seal. A < i tr-. My commission expues /l !'rrt \ 11 . L-0 t ( rpires 4n ,u\.\2" Town Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) couNTY oF EAGLE ltt' The foreooino Developer lmprovement Agreement was gcknowledged befpre me thist3 ia1 o-f \ ecz-v-'.-t<.,^ ,20'!-hy t-D',lLi a,'w',' q.tbtc>--- U Witness my hand and official seal. My commissi on "*pn"", l-/.rt I l1 ?-o I ( F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\Administrative_Actions\DlA cash format_5-16-2007.doc Page 4 of 5 ocrfitlslYsgYa.sHE {r Design il,eview Eoard ACTIOH FORH nspartm€nt of Community Dovelopms|lt 75 South Frontate Roid, Vail. Colorado 81657 tel: 970,47$,1139 frr: S70,479.2,+5? webl www.vailgov.com Project Name: 9 VAIL ROAD SIGN Project Description: Participants: Project Address: legal Description: Parcel Number: Comments! DRB Number: DRB070700 FINAL APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGN FOR 9 VAIL ROAD OWNER HOLIDAY HOUSE CONDO ASSN. l2lIOl2OO7 Phone: 970479-7100 PO BOX s733 VAIL co 816s8 APPLICANT LYON DESIGN r211012007 PO BOX 637 EDWARDS c0 81632 9 VAIL RD VAIL Locat.on: LoU 9-B Block: Subdivision: 2101-071-0600-1 Phone: 970-926-8682 9 VAIL ROAD HOUDAY HOUSE BOARD/STAFF ACTION Modon By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: Planner: Bill Gibson Action: EXPIRED Date of Apprcval: DRB Fee Paad: $56,00 n )Lin *--f * --:LWV|. -JOL, Sign Application for Design Review Deparbnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 97 O.479.2139 tax: 97O.479.2452 web: www.vailgov,com General Information: All projeds requiring design rwiew must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the partio-rlar approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The projed may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmenbl Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. of the Request: LocaHon of the Proposal: Loh ?'6ebct' Physical Address: -.-Parcel Uo.' ltO /A7 / ALOh | (Contact Eagle Co. Assessorat 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) €/) Name(s) of Owner(s): ._--Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant:Da tull ulrl Mailing Address: f 7o- fa6-96FJ E-mail Address')atcts @ l/A tL, tix f o n) sJg oN o/o o)tn"^ Tgrc of Review and Fee: E" Signs tr Coreptual Revievv D New Constructiontr Addition tr Minor Alteration (m ulti-family/commercial) Minor Alteration (single'family/duplo() Changes b Approved Plans Sepantion Request E] tr n $50 Plus $1.00 persguare footoftohl sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an additjon where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, slch as, rer@fing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 fur minor changes b buildings and site improvemenb, such as, reroofing, painting, window rebining walls, etc. landscaping, fences and $20 No Fee For revisions to plans already Design Review Board. 1llll /o otc Staff or the /ofq. VdieWttaqr-Ft 7/$laryl4**IDesign Review Board ACTIOH FORM Department of Communaty Development 75 South Frontage Road. Vail, Colorado 81657 tel:970.479.2139 fax:97o-479.2452 web: www.vailg{rv.€om Proje€t Name! 9 VAIL ROAD CHANGE Proiect DescripUon: Project Address: Legal Description: Parcel ilumber: Comments: FINAL APPROVAL FOR A CHANGE TO THE APPROVED PLANS FOR AN ADDMON OF POOL EQUIPMENI CHANGE TO SHUTTERS ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND CHANGE TO LOCATTON OF EAST FENCE AT POOL AREA Participants: OWNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON OBI2II2OOT 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 90035 APPUCANT FRTTZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 0812t12007 Phone: 970-476-6342 1650 EASTVAILVALLEY DR, #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001,102 ARCHITECT FRfIZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 0812U2007 Phone: 97 0-47 6-6342 1650 EASTVAILVALLEY DR, #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 9 VAIL RD VAIL DRB Number: DR8070432 Location: 9 VAIL ROAD Loft 9-B Block: Subdivisioni HOUDAY HOUSE 2101-071-0600-1 Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Apptoval= 0911812007 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s), Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Apprwal of this poject shall lapse and beonre void one (1) year blbwing tfie date of final approval, unless a building permlt is issued and constniction is commenced and is diligenUy pursued torard omple$on. Cond: CON0009365 The pool fene shall not a(eed 6 ftet in height. @rd: CON0009366 Prior to construction of the clranges, the applicant shall coordlnate all landscaping in the easements wfth the applkable utility companles' Planner: Blll Glbson DRF Fee Pald: l20.OO New Construction Deparffi ent of Community D€velopment 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2128 fa><: 970,479.2452 web: www,vailgov,com Physicaf Address: 4 llx,, P-o,^t rlltr- L0 6/A51 Parel No.: atotn'r rndoot - azb (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-e640 for parcel no.) Zonlng:R$ u,tt Aee. a *.qLTaaryra^t fr *f r<t e r Name(s) of Owner(s): Malllng Address: General Informatlon: All projqts requiring design review must receive approval prior to submttting a building permit application. please refer to.the submithl requirements for the particular approval hat is requested, nn application ior Design Rwiew cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community oeveiopment Departmint. Theproject may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmenhl commission.Decign reniew approval lapses unless a building permit is lssued and cdnstruction comnences withinone year of the approval, Descriptionof theRequstz i[porrtoN Op Q.*t Fe ,.,,p. Ppp+_elJ*1gl-_ Locadonoftheproposal: t-ot: 6 elock:-suooivision: V*rlVaule* 74Frelr.vr6 tr, 8o \, z TP ^\ E r ! ii -.. \, ' t.irj I TOWN OF VAIL R Ii itrj Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: Maillng Address: Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs E Concephral Revielv tr New Constructlontr AddiUon tr Minor Alteration (mulU-famlly/commercial) El Minor Alteration (singlefamily/duplex) $ cnanees to Approved Plans tr Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For aonstruction of a neu buildtng or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & int€rior conversions).$250 For minor changes to buildlngs and site lmprovements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenb, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by planning Staff or the Design Rwioar Board. No Fee E-mail Address: For Office Use Only: FeePaid: 2A -= qtq*".'/VL(/ *:G ""*nnor*, f'( ?-o) *r*l-sD Holiday House Condominium Association (dba 9 Vail Road Condominiums) 9 Vail Road PO Box 5733 Vail, Colorado 81658 January 12,2006 Town of Vail Planning Commission and Design and Review Board As Managing Agent for the Holiday House Condominium Association dba 9 Vail Road, I have been asked to convey to the Town of vail Planning commission and also the Design and Review Board that the Association's Board of Directors has approved of the construction project which is cunently being designed and accordingly submitted for the interior and exterior renovation of the buildins located at 9 Vail Road. Board President :1, -,4' z'-<-'-J- "i"'-al Gwen Scalpello 970 476-t788 9 Vail Road Managing Agent Ptarmigan Management -/ /e... ( /i<,r.Lr+/ 970 476-3328 .fe Gon f i rmat I on Report -Fttt coPr IIEVELOPIf,IIT Memory Send Page Dat6 & T ine L in6 I E-ma i I lhch ine I D 001 Aur27-07 0l :45pm 9704792452 ToHil 0F VAlt CSltUl{lTY Job nunbor Date To llunber ol pages Start t i|||B End t ine Pages sent S tatus Job number : 600 600 Aur27 0l:43pn 4s476190r 002 Aur27 0l :43pu Aur27 0l:45pm 002 ()K *** SEND SUCCESSFUL ++* nowNoF75 Sourftvatl, CO 3l974-479-213eF.az 9ao-+79-2a52 COhIII\IIf'FiTTFY DE\TEI.OPNfiEN:T FA:T T:FT.dNSIVS:FTAI. SEIE'ET CIOIIIPAITIIY !IAITdE: AA.X TEf,,tPEIrr'l\fD ETlOlIII= er L R-o.d. DATE' St/21 # oD P^,G;E6i M Do(srrll|4lEr|ff. Cr\r€yl. IIYcLttIrEYG cro\ztiR gErEETr-4--- nEgProD{gE n E QnJIB.EI>? SEI{TEY ?cDftzN oF \r^rr. c'CDl\/twffr!{rfY xtt\zt1;opl\rlE!{:r E/rt< + qEo'1.14-.21.a TrOlraFI OF \'AIL C:OL[l\lfItNXfg Itt\ZELrOpnZtrr{T TELEPEOIraE *_-.e2ctat4EE_ sPE{rAr- cola\&iAaTs A.r{D NcDTtg= Ftsc- D=,1- c.an*t-,vfs - From: To: Date: Subi*t: CC: Mike Vaughan BlllGibson 0812712007 1:36 PM nlne vail road revisions Flre_Inspectors I notioe that the dans Indhates an Intent to relocate the backflow pra/entor, sprinkler rratve and other rebted appurtenanc out of the elevator equipment room. 'the plan does not indlcate where this equlpment is to be r€located too, Can you get me some feedback? Thanl6, Mlke, Mlke Vaughan ueutenanVHre Prevention Offlcer Vrt'l Fire & Emergency Services 970-47y2252 Flomi To: Dtte: Subject: Chad Salli Bill Gibson; David Rhoades; George Chalberg 0911212007 8:18 AM Re: 9 vail road changes DRB07-0432 just one comment, they need to coordinate with utility companles on landscape within the easements. Chad q|ad Salli, PE Project Engin€er Town of Vail - Public Works ffic€ 9701q79-2t69 Cell 970/376-2389 Fax 97O1479-2166 >>> Eiff Gibson 0911212007 8:05 AM >>> any commenb on the recent change to approved plans application? thank, bill ZONECHECK. b\Sot - obz, Filing J Exlsting , proposcd Total.(ft P ty- -+torsltdts.l- / UMllill @ Rcmaininq I ," Total GRFA 11 primaly CRFA Horv much of thc Sitc Covcragc Hcight + (t!,rf(67s*)a $-r",0**, /' ^ 1fi,(/,4 ltryq ( fs') w- tF Front Sidcs Rqr th/io - ,, Minimum ,'A:DN? + 675 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition itjon is uscd with thir ". ?0' -p .-R'.7 2,; ----? fr' r7payr> A"fkBZD' \ L^rndscaping RctainingWall Hciglh Complics Mth TOV Ligbting Ordinancc Arc finishcd gpdcs lcss than Z:L (50%) Enrironm cn hLlllazards Prq'ious conditions ofapproval (cbcck propcrty filc); n on-conforming? Dcscribc: JLILL- il,lzo il,d'" /,blLNVwvta (w**- *aw banta*"dU_ Pcrrwncdlqq,c_%Proposcd Slopc _% Z,vW ftWffi 1) Pcrccni Slopc (<>30% 2) Floodplain 3) Wctlands '4) Wdtcr Course Scback (30) 5) Gcologic Hazards a) Snorv Avalanchc b) RocKall c) Dcbris Florv 1'/6'(oe-\ xqunea (4 CI..q" {a aqp,ouul Ftor^s >(Bo7 - o?zz e/n/"'t T1 Phonc Pbonc hoposcd usc Brrildable arca vc a 250 Additr- lLtr7cll /S ^br ffrwqm tM1-- 7o g..N TT ssLI.-fI e \o + r[\.\ T F "ls st F NI: s\*! 6. R$ A frs * H )J sq$.{l$s 'aa 4a Ur* 7a 7y b{.q\ \-\o\ 0 a J\ T ls 6 $ 0 J* J: Jt o V ooo o a) Dfrco?- o37J i- Bmign Revleur *oard ACTrOll fo*,tl DEsartment of C.omm unity Development 75 $outh Frontage Road, llail. Eoloredo 8tr657 t€t: S7tt.479.2139 fax: 97O"479.?,iSZ rryeb: www.vailgov-com Prctect llamer 9 VAIL ROAD POOVI-ANDSCAPING Protect Descrlptlon: RNAL APPROVAL FOR POOVSPA RELOCATION, FENCE/WALL, IANDSCAPING Participants: OWNER gVAILROADCONDO.ASSN. O3lZ3l2OO7 Phone:970-479-1788 GWEN SCAPALLO PO BOX 5733 VAIL co 81658 APPUCANT FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS C3,l23l2OO7 Phone: 970-476'6342 1650 EASTVAILVALLEY D& #C-1 VAIL co 81657 Liense: C000001,102 ProjectAddress: 9VAILRDVAIL location: 9VAILROAD Legal DescripUon: Lot: 9-B Block: Subdivision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 2101-071-0600-1 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION DREilumber: DR8070104 Action: APPROVED Date of Approvalr O4l04'l2OO7 Motion By: Second By: Vote: CondiUons: DUNNING DANTAS 4-0 Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written @nsent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). @nd:0 (Pl,{N): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building, Please consult with Town of Vall Bulldlng personnel prlor to construction activities. Cond:201 DRB apprwal shall not become rralid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of thls project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completlon. Cond: 113 All development applications submitted to the Town after the effective date of Ordinance 26, Series 2006 shall be subject to the pending emplo,yee housing regulations in whatever form they are finally adopled; prorlded, however, that if the Tovvn fails to adopt the pending emploryee housing regulations by April L5, 2:007, this Ordinance shall not apply to such dwelopment aPpllcaUons. Cond: CON0008826 The applicant shall plant one additional 15 foot spruce tree on the south property boundary preserve and relocate one existing spruce tree on the east property boundary, and plant one addltlonal 15 fmt spruce tree on the east property boundary as noted on the plans at the publlc hearing. Ptanner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Pald: $20.00 New Construction Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970,479.2728 faxi 97 0.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: AII projects requiring design re^/iew must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. nn appticaUon ior Design Rwiewcannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Departmlnt. Theproiect may also need to be revie\ /ed by the Town council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses untess a building permlt is lssued and c6nstrucion commenoes within one year of the approval, Physical Addrcss: Parcef No.;ztolmltoAo*e *at & (ContactEagleCo.Assessorat9T0-328-8640forparcel no.) Trrning:?trfuurr Aee or^"ottarrz:n DLE-l-Kt* r Nam{s)ofowner(s):lVov RA e.-uf: * ,(C.f'',6,^ ,( tf"ur} Malling Address: Name of Applicant: Mailing Address: lYpe of Revlew and Fee: tr Signs E Conceptual Review n New ConstructionO Addition tr Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) tr Minor Alteration (sin gle-family/du plex) ( Changes to Approved Plans'o sepactjon Request s/rc/a7 7 6tovo .\b e, $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of tobl sign area. No Fee $550 For conshuction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square foobge is added to any residential or commercial building (lncludes 250 additions & interior conversions).$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemeng such as, re-rooflng, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc.$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvernents, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc.$20 For rsr'isions to plans already approved by planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee \.. I Owner{s) Signature(s): E-mail Address:70- q7{*4qot gff* 8Y ,nE,,".,t43/8 *. BG ProjectNo.: A)-o'oY Design Review Board ACTIOil FORI,I Department of Communlty Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vall, Coloredo 81657 tef: 970.479.2139 ta'.: 97O.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com Project Name: 9 Vail Road - temp site dev sign Project Description: FINAL APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE-AN ADDMON TO PCSTING LOBBYTOWARD VA]L ROAD Pailicipants: owNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 0712512007 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 90035 APPUCANT NEDBOCONSTRUCION 07/2512007 Phone:970-845-1001 P.O. BOX 3419 VAIL co B16sB License: 251-A ProJectAddress: 9VAILRDVAIL Location: gVAILROAD Legal Description: [ot: 9-B Block: Subdivision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 2101-071-0600-1 Comments: SEE CONDmONS DRB Number: DRB070357 Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION ACtion: STAFFAPR Date of ApprovaF 0810112007 Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Entry: 08/01/2007 By: RLF Action: COND 1. The applicant shall remove approved signs prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Rachel Friede DRB Fee Paid: $62.00Planner: 75 South Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 97 0-47 9 -2r3 8 / 47 9 -2r 39 FAX970-479-2452 August 1,2007 Nedbo Construction PO Box 3419 Vail, CO 81657 Re: DRB07-0357 Part of Lot A, B, C, Vail Village 2nd Filing 9 Vail Road Condo Association Department of Community Development Dear Rollie, Thank you for your application for temporary site development sigrage at 9 Vail Rd. The purpose ofthis letter is to inform you that your application has been staffapproved with the following condition: I . The applicant shall remove approved signs prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. A DRB Action Form is included for your records, If you have any questions or concems, please feel free to contact me. Best, .,a) r tJ)(Jla.l^dfr,*Q" Rachel Friede Town Planner (970Y79-2440 Rfriede@vailgov.com Attachments: l. DRB Action Form r il't ''i Sign Application for Design Review Deparhnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 te/; 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479'2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested, An application for Design Review cannot be accepted untii all required information is received by the Community Dwelopment Department' The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction @mmences within one year of the approval. DescripUon of the Request: v \. vvq sn*dl Ol \ MEG hl .jul tJti WN OF VAII Location of the Proposah LoH-Block:- Subdivision:0zta'/ltuse Physical Address:t/.4/( SoQa U/4/L Parcef No.: J/A / oqru 6 OO/ 4h(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: lULlLfl n'b/n/Lf Name(s) of owner(s): 7 / '- n ^ Co-',rao-or '. "rlnn 4tgact4no-' Mailing Address: Name of Applicant: t/.4iL (c-t F/ar> Mailing Address:flu/ E-mail Address: Tyjeot Reviewand Feerq sisns E Conceptual Review tr New Crnstructiontr Addition tr Minor Alterauon (multi-Fa mi lylcommercial) tr Minor Aheration (single-family/duplex) tr Changes to Approved Plans tr Separation Request (o Phone: Fax: Plus 91.00 per square foot of total sign area' 3' * { ' For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any Elv .ii;L z 4 ?B0l $s0 No Fee $6s0 $300 commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions)' $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painung, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee 1 SIGN APPUCATION SUBMITTAT REQUIREMENTS General Information This application is for any sign that is located within the Town of Vail, Specific requirements are available from the Department of Community Development. I. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Name of Business: B. Building name and physical addressi C. Written approval from condominium association, landlord, and joint owner, if applicable. D. Type of sign (check all that apply): FFreestanding Sign tr Building Identification $ivafl sign co.ttg-r24n4-v Frt4clLtr Mural QHanging / Projecting Sign tr Window Sign [Display Box tr Sign Program trDaily Special Board trJoint Directory Sign QSubdivision Entrance Sign Number of signs existing: / tr Gas Filled/Fiber Optic D Temporary Sign (ottrer E. F. \J, H. I. J. K. L. Number of signs proposed: Sign message: 4)ul c Sign and lettering dimens o^h. (attach a colored scaled schematic 1at'-u?'? 5 ions for each proposed sign3'4v' a"drawing@7+"=1'): Length of business frontage: Height of sign(s) from grade: \ F' Sign Location (attach a site plan and an elevation drawing or a photograph clearly indicating the proposed location of sign(s)): Materials and colors of sign (attach samples):lluze.4-uy/ ozu (^l/t r^ Sign lighting plan;A,/a Ate r/r/-ur* o Indicate type, location and number of fixtures.u Include height above grade, lumens output, luminous area.o Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture. M. Dmwings showing how and where the sign or awning will attach to the- building and how the awning wir be constructed. /Tfinrlj !I ]f,lt.-.j N, The Administrator and/or DRB may require thefr[bmi$iii:df-pdaitional.pfans, drawings, specifications, samples and other materials (incldinf. b model) if deemed necessary to determine whether a project will comply with Desigr Quidelines or if the intent of the proposat is not ctearty indicated. i\, S ttCn F:\cdev\FoRMs\Permits\Planning\DRB\si9n-apptication-rr-or-roor.Ool' 'r^n).rQ{f rzt05l2oo5 'lt.r}'.I NOTESTO ALL APPUCANTS Time Requlrements The Design Review Board meets on the lst and 3rd Wednesdays of each month. A complete application form and all accompanying material must be aGpted by the Community Development Department prior to application deadlines. A schedule of DRB meetings and associated application deadlines may be found on the World Wide Web at www.vailqov.com. Review Criteria The proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Design Guidelines as set forth in Title 12 (Zoning Regulations) and Title 14 (Development Standards) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Desiqn Review Board Meetino Reguirements For new construction and additions, the applicant must stake and tape the project slte to indicate property lines, proposed buildings and building corners. All trees to be removed must be hped. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not burled by snow. All site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the day of the DRB meeting. The applicant or their representative, shall be present at the Design Review Board Hearing. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB agenda until such time as the item has been republished. If the DRB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be resolved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff Aporoval The Administrator'(a member of the planning stafi) may review and approve Design Review applications, approve with certain modifications, deny the application, or refer the application to the Design Review Board for a decision. All staff approvals are reviewed by the Design Review Board and any staff decision is subject to final approval by the DRB. F :\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Planning\DRB\sign_application_1 2-05-2005.doc Page 4 of 4 1210s/200s {r.ire | 07.23.07 1::)i1;l)it!ty Tom Henderson Nedbo Const. Angelo Veraldi N lr0r * l:ii )tj i .: llX :c fic 845. t00 | tom@nedbo.com nedbo/2007/tyrolean(9.vail.rd).ai Tom - Here is the info :: layout for the signs you need: size :: 3'w x 4'h qty:: I pc ea:: single sided mac :: die-cut vinyl, l/2" MDX colors :: black & burgundy texc white text cost:: $ 305.00 ea + tax design :: $ 30.00 TYROLEAN CONDOMINUI,IS 400 E. Meodow Drive voil, CO 81657 Permit # 8rc7-0051 Generql Conlroctor aa-tF nril,w tattt I I I tlttaa lcrll,l1lt|f,t(i11(!-dt t?fts$-lo0l www.NEDBO.com Please review this and let me know how you'd like to proceed. lf you have any questions or concerns, please contact me, lf you would like to approve this proof or make any changes, please complete the form at the botom and return via the email button included. Thanks - Angelo 'T1 ll l' ; CoailtlltlrY tEltELOPlEllt Design Review Eoard ACTION FORI'I Departm€nt of Community trevelopment 75 South Ftontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479,2139 tdxi 970.479.2452 web: www-vailgov.com ProJect Name: Project Description: FRITZLEN PIERCE 9 VAIL RD DRBNumber: DR8070340 FINAL APPROVAL FOR A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCNON SIGN FOR FRITZLEN PIERCE Paticlpants: owNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 0712312007 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 90035 APPLICANT FRmLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 07 I 231 2007 Phone: 970-476-5342 1550 EAST VAIL VALLEY DR, #C.1' VAIL co 816s7 License: 000001402 ARCHITECT FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 0772312007 Phonet 970-476-6342 1650 EAST VAIL VALLEY DR, #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 ProJectAddress: gVAILRDVAIL Location: 9VAILROAD Legal Descrlptlon: Lot: 9-B Block: Subdivision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number! 2101-071-0600-1 Comments: Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION ACtiON: STAFFAPR Date of APProvalz O7l24l2N7 Cond: B (PI-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the wriften consent of Town of Vail statr and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Entry: O7l?412Q07 By: RLF Action: COND 1. The applicant shall remove approved signs prior to the issuance of a temporary celtificate of occupanry' Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become vojd one (1) year following the date oi hnal approvat, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced Department of Community Dwelopment 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 97Q.479.2t39 f axi 970.479.245? web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design revbw must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal rcquirernents for the particular approval that is requesGd. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Da/elopment Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Decign rerriew approval lapses unless a building pemit is issued and construction oommenoes wiurin one year of the approval. b]dktl I ffil?l 1;7,j)' "lf,4- Y cofl6t'r's *4 ( p;1 sie^,ri Sign Application for Design Review oP(t,ev o Cr.RoDescription of the Requqtl aI 9 .,Jdi t Ftz,: 6 ?4,T ol Locatlon of the Proposal: Lot: .*, B tc. Block:_ Subdivision : PhysicalAddress: * v{tI Fc#s{d parcel No.: 2:lol a-7 | O G O O l' o,?^1 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning:PA t{ame(s) of owner(s):9 Va, i !,lcacl" Cq, '',c ,,1 -' s. + i: , "{ t'.i + ' 'l Maillng 1661sss; e/o G",e ,t Sral gdx =/tJ Vc, r c6r 8l b6 9-7o 41 a l78g Owner(s) SignaUre(s): frfame of Appli un1. f rttzlevl ?tevx € .4""{r"t (-..f .o rf,f i'l108;*'LbEa e .\d, I YatLey Pv- ?-/a Aab - 0342-8t t"s-t Phone: E-mail Address:Faxi tr tr tr tr TyF"t Review and Fee: E Signs Conceptual Review New Construction Addition Minor Alterauon (multi-family/commercial) Minor Alteration (single.family/d u plex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request $50 Plus $1,00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenb, such as, reroofing painting, window addfions, landscaping, fences and rebining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemants, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee tr tr ,.ffi SIGN APPTICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS General Information This application is fror any sign that is located within the Town of Vail. Specific requirements are available from the Deparbnent of Community Development. I. SUBMITTAT REQUIREMENTS A. Name of Business: Frl\ zle-n Pt e(ee .^ /tht+e(+6: B. Buildingnameandphysical addressi 9 Vdl| K.oaA ,? vdil Poad tva\lt'o8165'7 C. Written approval from condominium association, landlord, and joint owner, if applicable, D. Type of sign (check all that apply): s\lvted aPY ' trFreestanding Sign lWall Sign l'lHanging / Projecting Sign trDisplay Box DDaily Special Board trJoint Directory Sign r,"lSubdivision Entrance Sign Number of signs proposed: tr Building Identification tr Mural tr Window Sign tr Sign Program tr fras Filled/Fiber Optic dTemporary Sign tr Other Number of signs existing: O E. F. G. H. t J, K. L. Sign message: Prl t-z le,a P(e(cr. .W tsc|s t 9 vz'r I Ecacl Sign and lettering dimensions for each proposed sign (attach a colored scaled schematic drawing@1/+"=l): Length of business frontage: -\l/A Height of sign(s) from grade: +of a4- ttoivt a+ +''Y ol kvce Sign Location (attach a site plan and an elevation drawing or a photograph clearly indicating the proposed location of sign(s)): Materials and colors of sign (atbch samples): U,/A Vl/.)Yi Sign lighting plan: tr Indicate type, location and number offixtures,o Include height above grade, lumens ouQut, luminous area.o Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture. Drawings showing how and where the sign or awning will attach to the building and how the awning wiff be constructed. zItp *es .l-o cc.?€iruztr<an 1arte e applEation_12-05-2005.d0c Page 3 of 4 : tl T0'Sdtj ' ,Jtu Adrniolttrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional plans, drawings, nf.SlGf\ lqpqqlfiptipqrs, samples and other materials (including a model) if deemed necessary to iinf f AHdbiftfiiidllvhether a project will comply with Design Guidelines or if the intent of therr t' ". proposal is not clearly indicated,ot pfifIF:t210s12005 &Tl''.! F:c^^a;o*l si?^ fc t':^c ,u^if.=\ E-o^-$- 'rtnw'llqefi * t*n"ry fl-'- colllttTY tEllEletExt Design Review Soad ACTIOH FORl,l Oewrtment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road" lteil. Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 fax:970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com Prcject Namel 9 VAIL ROAD CHANGE Prorect Descriptlonl Change to approved plans for revised scope of work which was previuosly approved by DRB. New scope includes lessened new entry covering and exterior renovation. Subject to conditions of public works approval from previous submittal. Participants: owNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON tvr4l2006 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 90035 APPLICANT FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS tt I L4 12006 Phone: 970-476-6342 1650 EASTVAIL VALLEY DR, #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 ARCHITECT FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS ltl 14 1200f, Phone: 970-475{342 1650 EASTVATLVALLEY D& #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 Project Addrcss: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 9 VAIL ROAD Legal Descriptionr LoU 9-B Block: Subdivision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 2101-071-0500-1 Comments: DRB Number: DRB060530 Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTIOI{ Action: APPROVED DaE of Approvalz lUtT/2006 Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and bemme void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: 113 All development applicaUons submitted to the Town after the effective date of Ordinance 26, Series 2006 shall be subject to the pending employee housing regulations in whatever form they are finally adopted; provided, however, that if the Town fails to adopt the pending employee housing regulations by April L5,2007, this Ordinance shall not apply to such development applications. Planner: DRB Fee Paid: S2O.OO New Construction Application for Design Review Depaftment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teli 97O.479.2t28 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application, Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is reeived by the Community Development Department. The pmject may also need to be revier,l/ed by the Town Council and/or the Plannlng and Environmental Commission. Design rcview approval lapses unless a building permlt is issued and construction commences within one year of the appronal. Ilescription Req Locationof theProposal: tot: f\ glock: Physical Address: Parcel No..2toto1 t D t ()c^r - oLz (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor ai gT0-328-8640 for parcel no.) Name(s)of owner(s): 1Var, RA C.,nf.. At-- " (C,O,4,,oul Lulrno*o) Malling Address: Name of Applicant: Mailing Address: zoningz?u3,utt Aae . rar,oaTtav D*?lr;t* r -Phone= clTO-4-7b'4HZ $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction ofa new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an additjon where square footage is added to any residential or commerdal fuilding (indudes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc,$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window addltlons, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. d u O(}r'oh 0,,,o \:l Type of Review and Fee: n Sbns tr Conceptual ReMew tr New ConstructionD Addition D Minor Alteration (mulil-family/commercial) E Minor Alteration (single-fa mily/du plex) S Chanees to Approved Plans tr Seoaration Reouest Owner(s) Slgnature(s)! E-mail Address: APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR f - oolZ EoC. oo Y7 7Project #: OF LDING IT PLIC Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION COMPLETE VALUATION & Materials For Parcet# Contact at 970-328-8640 or visit FOR OFFICE USE ONLY F: \cdev\KIRMS\Permits\Building\bui ldingjermit. DOC .uJf4uc f'7'7 -o2cr /Ho34S H1 ./2ae3a BUILDING: $ l,t6,acso- $\' TOTAL: $ I.tOO' ootJ- 6,.. Jto /67ry(i6ot: Job Name: ? frqrj R)JobAddress: ? uZic /&"4t L/A/L (o 3 /erv Legal Description Subdivision: l/', rm 4y /traa i Q Uatc Po44 : /6,5-0 .r..+rL-'z/76 4Jqz- E><rr zt cttz srL/co6 E, 4.,.-.u €72r *r, . f,l.6 5 i'7< t.4.Jt-4t:_ 7,4tt-4 L_ 3 /.f f,.2 -a-\ ,aoa.zsF, -v(ta/t S t U1,r( T Work Class: New (ition ( ) Remodel Repair( ) Demo( ) Other( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both (l\Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No ( ) Type ofBldg.: Single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Multi-familyD( Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building:No. of Accommodation Units in this building: p 2 No/Type of : Gas Apoliances ( ) GasLoos( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Gas Loqs (,.l.} Wood/Pellet Od Wood Burnino (NOT ALLOWED r= la.tFl\-ilti lUttulU V 2006 tF tl 10 oH, nEcilll - - |i1 MAR Utl TOWN Page 1 of 15 From: To: Date: Subfect: Mike McGee Lynne Campbell 031291200612:05:50 PM Re: 806-0047 (9 Vail Rd.) dedeuct four hours at $58 / hr. >>> Lynne Campbell 03,/29 10:46 AM >>> How much should we keep for your time? >>> Mike Vaughan 03/29 10:45 AM >>> I had looked at the plans, as well as Mike. I think some deduction would be ruananted. Mike. >>> Chris Gunion 03/28/06 9:45 AM >>> Just to let everyone know, I Vail Road has withdrawn their building permit application. The applicant is requesting a refund of the plan check fees. I had a few initial meetings, but never started my plan review. lf anlone else has time into this project, we may want to think about deducting that from the refund amount. I Chris Gunion l.C.C. Plans Examiner Town of Vail Building Safety and Inspection Services 970.479.2369 counion@vailoov.com CG:Fire_lnspectors v-t /:t Vo*Wlz7'rtu7 > Design Review Board l* 7n ACTIOII FCRlrl D€partment of Community Develpgment 75 South Frontage Road, Va*l, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.8139 fax:970.479.2452 web; www.vailgov,qom TNffiItrIffN g{**trsarY oEvELoFuEXt Project Name: 9 VAIL ROAD RENOVATION Project Descripdon: FINAL APPROVAL FOR AN EXTERIOR RENOVATION Participants: owNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 0210612006 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 9003s APPUCANT FRFZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECIS 0210612006 Phonet 970476-6342 1650 EASTVAIL VALLEY DR, #C.1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 ARCHnECI FRTTZLEN PIERCE ARCHmCTS 0?/0612006 Phone: 970-476-6342 1650 EAST VAIL VALLEY DR'' #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 Project Addrcss: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 9 VAIL ROAD Legal Description: Lotl 9-B Block Subdivislon: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 2101-071-0500-1 Comments: BOARD/STTAFF ACTIOI{ DRB Numben DR8060027 Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 03/01/2006 Motion By: Dunning Second By: Donruard Vote: 3-0-1 (Fritzlen recused) Conditionsr Cond:8 (P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (PI-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction adivities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of appronl. @nd:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date New Construction Application for Design Review All projects requiring design rwiew must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. nn appltca on ior Design Reviewcannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Develbpment Departmlnt. Theproject may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and cdnstruction commenc€s within one year of the approval. General Information: Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81552 teli 970.479.2728 fax: 97 0.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construcUon of a ns/,, building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, palntlng, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc.$20 For minor changes to buildings and slte improvements, such as, re-rooflng, painting. window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc.$20 For revisions to plans already approved by planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applacant: MaifinsAddress: /&-$O "t llarL-Vazrcv Dp. Qxtu (fr &l&,67 Phone: ,F,|.i:.,_LP ffiffi \$Type of Review and Fee:tr Signs D Concepfual Review New Construction Addition Minor Afteration (multi-family/com mercial) Minor Alteration (sin g le-fa m ily/du plex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request tr K tr n tr FEB 06 2006 rowN ol-yalL Phone: 70-4ab-6342 E-mail Address:47 6- 4qol Holiday House Condominiurn Association (dba 9 Vail Road Condominiums) 9 Vail Road PO Box 5733 Vail, Colorado 81658 January 12,2006 Town of Vail Planning Commission and Design and Review Board As Managing Agent for the Holiday llouse Condominium Association dba 9 Vail Road, I have been asked to convey to the Town of vail Plaruring commission and also the Design and Review Board that the Association's Board of Directors has approved of the construction project which is currently being designed and accordingly submitted for the interior and exterior renovation of the buildins located at 9 Vail Road. Board President q h.*-<+J "7.e- lrl Gwen Scalpello 970 476-1788 9 Vail Road Managing Agent Ptarmigan Management 970 476-3328 Buildino Materials Color ffi4 04 /7 /. )A rrs A\4 t'|.- //.8 Fat L{T l\r2JA lW t -lr r.\L-Ot<- fr/vi fr /7 Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting Other ful anrea FEP EM /-tC - /L8 fAv#TL1rJE ft*&a d"-P to,-t-,r^l t L*r -J P Notes: Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. 1v+ PROPOSED MATERIALS Tvoe of Material etn/"1* Jfz.l,."-6 ?scE*.*fK- GrArt fuulEErE AL-LIrvr)FL)tY1 Zxzffie fA{z *x:r-qtt- ALuort-/ury\, FooPl ZJ-t|E--: zxcEp^e Es- pg74-, - Z XaE c*np rae,e- CE:aO, - n2*tz.c ?'ft)cE-^ ]U a,ae"&ae_ F{tz'-{ F<t4-f, €ecza4 hl-ulalNun - lr'J t+ tTE Page 6 of I2lo2l07lO2 1v* PROPOSED TANDSCAPING Botanical Name Common Name OuantiW Size PROPOSED TREES -*Efr-A@re- AND SHRUBS DCSTING TREES TO BE REMOVED Eptemntt€rnre Z 4o', z5t Minimum Requirements for Landscaping: - Deciduous Trees - 2" Caliper Coniferous Trees - 6'in height Shrubs - 5 Gal. Tvpe Square Footage GROUND COVER SOD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL Please specify other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Pase 7 of I2l02l07l0Z New Construction Application for Design Review RECEIvED JAN I ti 20ffi Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 97 0.479.2128 f axi 97 0.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Rwiew cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, The project may also need to be revielrred by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is lssued and construction commences within one year of the approval, Description of the Requestl (7?Location of the Prcposal: Lot: F glock:- Subdivision: Physicaf Address: 4 lJx,, P.e.^V,ltrr- Lf A/A4.-l Parc.€; No.. 1tota1 t n Aocrt - aLb (Contact Eagle Co, Assessor at 970-328-85,10 for parcel no.) Name(s)of owner(s): lVot- RA C.,nft-, At-o.- (C,O,6,,ou,i gr:,trnrro) Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s) : Nameof Apptiunt, fr,rr-rtrrt?sptr- Ar.^+rrerrs (C,O. &u, ?t ep<ce) MaifineAddress: /650 { l' v Ve,rt-ev D^. \t t, (O 8/6,57 Phone: 'l70-4-7b'1342 E-mail Address:Fax: ?Zo- qz 6- 4 qol Type of Review and Fee: Signs Conceptual Review New Construction Addition Minor Alteration (multi-family/com mercial) Minor Alteration (singlefamily/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request _ Phone: ,/ /c" g o 6-sI\o D F tr! D $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial buildlng (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc, $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and rebining walls, etc.$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Rs/lew Board. No Fee rl tr Holiday flouse Condominium Association (dba 9 Vail Road Condominiums) 9 Vail Road PO Box 5733 Vail, Colorado 81658 Januarv 12.2006 Town of Vail Planning Commission and Design and Review Board As Managing Agent for the Holiday House Condominium Association dba 9 Vail Road, I have been asked to convey to the Town of vail planning commission and also the Design and Review Board that the Association's Board of Directors has approved of the construction project which is currently being designed and accordingly submitted for the interior and exterior renovation of the buildins located at 9 Vail Road. Board President -.4rn-,Jl'c'-t ;'i /" ^'7-o7':('--_i/ Gwen Scalpello 970 476-1788 9 Vail Road Managing Agent Ptarmigan Management Tom Saalfeld 970 476-3328 .-- I _lz''J'llllu4u I Iln-' I IlFtrl | |td- I IIr.i-o- I I+t-- o cU c) t! Z a{ -. q ffiffi U) E -, :E Eo U (! : \- ch o rd (J LtJ .JoV) \c3 -:c rt E '- c oU (! =fil Ot - ---- ---- l--lz1'l.llllHu I Iifrcz I IlFl,.r I I l.l- I IItro I I 'j=(t L! (t trl - (n := E I't -CI fld : tzultluJu I IlNe I IlE,..t I Itn- I IlrJ-A. t I F(! c.) LU t/) 0) .5cO a.l f U) tr :s E -o U c0 u fft O) !59r90(moEf nvtrilr or€ -wM w CVOU IIVA 6 zo tr{ tuJtu TFlooi.l zo F tuJu I l-- v_oz ___ _\ '-_lEu \ l[ liitFtr \ ti i",lr; \ t! iii zo F IuJlu F \t){ tu zo tr luItu Folu :..to{'!|gvm^r'v^ cvot lrv 6 ryn /ry(" /'{"12t"'/ -*'X.6ft) 7, fufrd 1)haz'tt:AAfr/'* 7 ./e Maru ffi;/";;;6;4:-ak"-T * 7/(/Zpzt -".,frM-hru' "h4A** '/-z/ 7'*-"*ff3',fu./4 b-L k/q ' Zv ,fr* /-fr{r*(,ffi/ n "/ o-,,/rdfi,,rtZ -,' //4//44/..12 .{anJ 7W -ru1atz@;7;'/;;b'* &* (,,q / //r,-/Lt*/4 h aott* / 6tdlt 7 /,4 , fi ao*1la"ea:z/'/f- , y',,. ,/ z 07ry' ,/rr-q* T1^-*- ,rr* r"r# 4t4-:f,0ruf ula'U,aad, 7'o/" 4 ?r*z47* r,*& -*|.lFrrylx r ,/.,- 'r 7,r / .f ')l ,Irl ii9 *-t I I j.. .'.'' rl # # .L t€lrl- -t '-jar-- ilT rrn I I T \:: .,J -'t, rll"' 't:: I a ,"+ a' t'.' tl € : /\) NJo- n (-) =: a .? t-.)-t\ l-J a'ia Z -lr+ J m] o |J =f. I -\JE =f. J +h N) T'fl_FmlpN nin mZ : /\) |a\ -) \/ ra ) ='J C' a .< cl cl\ a (- r+ rTl o 0r =l'. I ^\-/ !J. + N) T T] mf FN t,m mZ : /\) 9J(-\ o J =') ='J a a) -1 c rn OJv) rn o gJ !:'. In L/f. + NJ !'r| ml FN rlm mZ \o : /\) LIJo- ^ \., \4 =' -' (n >aoa rn o gJ cr'. = I ^7\ =1.. + NJ !T1 rnf FN r tm mZ February 20, 2006 Mr. Bill Pierce Mr. James Ohlson Fritzlen Pierce Architects 1650 E. Vail Valley Drive, #C-1 Vail. CO 81657 Fax: 970.476.4901 Re: 9 Vail Road Condominiums Minor Exterior Alteration Application (DR8060009) 13 Vail Road/Lot 98, Vail Village 2- Filing Dear Sirs, Thank you for attending the Design Review Board hearing on Wednesday, February 15th, of a conceptual review for an encroachment into the front setback at 9 Vail Road. The Design Review Board made the following comments regarding the proposal: ' The curent request to minimize the amount of encroachment (-21 square feet) into the front setback was appreciated by the Board. ' The Board encouraged further study of this proposal and requested that 3D representation be brought before the Board at the next hearing of this item to befter describe the nature of the new lobby space. Thank you for continuing progress with this application. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that arise before final review submittal. Best regards, Elisabeth Eckel 970.479.2454 ' , I' 1 7 Department of Comnunity Development 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www,vailgov.com January 19,2006 Mr. Bill Pierce Mr. James Ohlson Fritzlen Pierce Architects 1650 E. Vail Valley Drive, #C-1 Vail, CO 81657 Fax: 970.476.4901 Re: 9 Vail Road Condominiums Exterior Alteration Application (PEC060005) Lot 98, Vail Village 2m Filing Dear Sirs, Thank you for submitting an application for a variance from the front setbacks and an application for conceptual review of an addition at the referenced address. Please note that although a Planning and Environmental Commission application is required for a minor exterior alteration, the actual application will be reviewed only by the Design Review Board, provided the following numbers can be verified: 1. The addition of new floor area must encompass less than 1,000 square feet; 2. The proposal must comply with the maximum site coverage requirement of 65% of the total site area; and 3. The proposal must comply with the minimum landscaping requirements for a lot within the Public Accommodation (PA) zone district of at least 307o of the total site area. Provided the above numbers can be verified, the proposal will be reviewed as a minor alteration by the Design Review Board rather than the Planning and Environmental Commission, pursuant to the following section of the Vail Town Code: 1 2-7A-1 2: EXTERIOR ALIERAfTOTVS OR MODIFICATTOITS.' A. Review Required: The construction of a new building or the aftention of an existing building shall be reviewad by the design revlew board in accordance with chapter 11 of this tiUe. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee club units, any prcject which adds morc than one thousand (1,000) square feet of commercial floor area or common space, or any project which has subsfanfla/ off site impacts (as determined by the administrator) shall be reviewed by the planning and environmental commission as a major exterior afteration in accotdance with this chapter and section 12-3-6 of this title. Complete applications for major exterior al|.r-rr,tions shall be submifted in accordance with administratlye schedu/es developed by the depaftment of communify development for planning and environmental commission and design rcview board review. Furthermore, the Design Review Board will also be privy to the review of the proposed encroachment into the setback, pursuant to the following section of the Vail Town Code: {p ^t"""rto r r"^ 12-74-6: SEIBACKS; ln the PA district, the minimum frcnt setback shall be twenty feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be twenty feet (20'), and the minimum rear setback shatl be twenty feet (20'). At the discretion of the planning and environmental commission and/or the design review board, variations to the setback standards outlined above may be approved duing the review of exterior alternations or modifications (section 12- 7A-12 of this afticle) subject to the applicant demonstrcting compliance with the following criteia: A.Proposed building setbacks provide necessa,'y sep aration between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. B.Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail village uhan design guide plan and design considerations. C.Proposed building setbacks will ptovide adequate availability of light, air and open space. D.Proposed building sefbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent propefties. E.Ptoposed building setbacks will rcsult in creative design solutions or other public beneftts that could not othetwise be achieved by conformance with prcscribed sefback sfandards. However, the following issues must be addressed before a final hearing occurs with the Design Review Board: 1.Please submit existing and proposed site and grading plans. On the site plan, please indicate the existing and proposed layout of buildings and other structures including decks, palios, fences, walls and roof overhangs. Indicate the foundation with a dashed line and the roof edge with a solid line. This will allow me to finalize the sile coverage calculations. Please submit a landscape plan that details any plantings to be removed or added as well as any work that will be occurring within the planter along Vail Road. Please submit a roof height plan if the proposal includes an amendment to the existing roof height, as I heard it might, along with the proposed roof ridge lines on the roof forms that are changing as a part of this application, with contour lines shown underneath. This will be used to calculate building height. Please provide the existing and proposed architoctural floor plans for each level, particularly the lowest level. This will allow me to verify the site coverage number that was requested earlier in this correspondence. Please submit a section of lhe new entryway foyer for further clarification of the proposal. Additionally, please verify the possible addition of a covered egress stair that may be constructed to the north of the proposed lobby area as this may result in an increase in site coverage as well. Please calculate and submit any change in parking needs that will result from the increase in floor atea. Please submit a site and grading plan, speciflcally detailing the proposal along Vail Road. Please include on that plan any proposed changes to the entryway drive including percenl slope and spot elevations at the property line and as necessary along the centerline of the driveway to accurately reflect grade. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. Please be aware that the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District has requesled to be party to the easement that extends from the north to the south edge of the property along Vail Road. I would suggest contacting Fred Haslee at the Water District for more information regarding this sub.point (fhaslee@erwsd.oro). 10. Please indicatq a 4'wide unheated concrete pan at the edge of asphalt. 11. Please indicate the location of limits of disturbance fencing. 12. Please indicate all snow storage areas. 13. Pleas show on the site or landscape plan the location of all proposed exterior lighting fixtures on the building and amongst the landscaping. 14. Please indicate on the architectural elevations all proposed exterior materials. Additionally, please provide exterior color and material samples for the final Design Review Board meeting. Thank you for addressing these concerns. Please submit all required information to me at least ten business days prior to the meeting at which you would like this item to be heard as a final review. Meanwhile, I think that we have enough information to proceed to the Design Review Board at a conceptual level on Wednesday, February 1"t. 2006. Elisabeth Eckel 970.479.2454 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TaiL Colorado 81657 970-479-2 t 38 MX 970-479-2452 www.vaugov.com February 3, 2006 Mr. Bill Pierce Mr. James Ohlson FriElen Pierce Architects 1650 E. Vail Valley Drive, #C-1 Vail. CO 81657 Fax: 970.476.4901 Re: 9 Vail Road Condominiums Minor Exterior Alteration Application (DR8060009) 13 Vail Road/Lot 98, Vail Village 2m Filing Dear Sirs, Thank you for aftending the Design Review Board hearing on Wednesday, February 1tt, of a conceptual review for minor exterior alteration and setback encroachment requests. The Design Review Board made the following comments regarding the proposal: . The Board was quite supportive of the proposal to alter the exterior of the building through the addition of window shutters, new siding, new deck railings, chimney caps, brick pavers upon the driveway and other applicable elements of the exterior alteration. ' . The Board agreed that the re-development or re-fagade of this building was a necessary improvement, and likely a public benefit, due to its location at Easl Meadow Drive and Vail Road. . The Board requested that an alternative proposal be brought back to the Board which does not reflect any encroachment into the setback. Certain members of the Board felt that the proposed building setback would not result in a "public benefit that could not otherurise be achieved by conformance with (the) prescribed setback standards" of twenty feet (20') along the front property line. As we discussed, the Design Review Board must evaluate the validity of any setback encroachment request proposed within the Public Accommodation District according to compliance of the proposal with the following five criteria listed in Section 12-7A-6 of the Vail Town Code: A. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary sepantion between buildings and riparian arcas, geologically sensrliye areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. B. Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail village uhan design guide plan and design considerations. C. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. D. Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacerrt properties. {p ^""".,to rt,"* E. Proposed building setbacks will resuft in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otheruise be achieved by conformance with prescribed sefback standards. Please note that Stafr will confer with the Town Attorney to evaluate the level of subjectivity involved with criteria item E. Staffwill contact you once clarification has been received. lt may be mosl helpful to have two different proposals for the Board at the nelrt meeting. The Board may then use the same criteria to evaluate the weight of each different proposal according to its success as 1) a design solution; andlor 2l a public benefit. I have attached applicable elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan which reference the enclosure of first level spaces along pedestrian and vehicular ways. Thank you for addressing these concerns. Please don't hesitate to contiact me with remaining questions or concerns. 970.479.2454 enclosure cc: Matt Mire, Town Attorney; Town of Vail il L SUB.AREA CONCEPTS EAST MEADOW DRIVE 1. Short-term improvements, to upgrade entry appearance and nanow Vail Road to divert traffic east or west along the Frontrage Road. lmprovements include: - planting bed expansions to fill voids, uni! entries - island to nanow Vail Road - lree planting to further restrict views dor,vn Vail Road 2. Future study area. Long-term assessment of entry improvements in conjunction with South Frontiage Road improvements and Phase lV & V of Vail Mllage Inn. 3. Traffic circle fum-around to limit penetration of lost traffc. Convey a "dead-end" rcad closure appeaanoe from the Frontage Road, and at the same time create a major landscape focal point for west end of E. Meadow Drive as linkage to Lionshead. Traffic south of circle reduced by clear sign directives. Location of circle dependent on long-range plans for Ski Museum (see #5). 4. Landscape island to enclose circle, screen Bank parking, and make visual linkage to Lionshead. Bank ownership, coordination required. Potential loss of four parking spaces 5. Ski Museum site improvements. Outdoor display area framed by tree planting.- Raised paving surface wilh planters on front (circle) side for low-maintenance entry. Pedestrian walk. conflnues around to west. Long-term expansion potential limited, Further study needed to determine site suitability. 6. Pedestrian walk, separated ftom roadway, reinforced by tree ptanting, continues on north side of E. Meadow Drive to Lionshead. 7. Landscaped open space, approved element of Vail Village Inn special development district. Pedestrian path connection to Frontage Road and Town Hall. 8. Pedestrian walk, separated to Gore Creek path. 9. Further study needed. Potential commercial infill - 1 story. Further study to address size and placement of built structures, parking, and ac,cess considerations, Within specified constraints by infill development could: -complete E. Meadow Drive, to its natural Vail Road terminus, as an atlractive pedestrian slreet with a variety of landscaped open spaces and pedestrian scale shops - effectively extending the character of the core. to Vail Road - complete the framing of the Vail Road intersection as a defined open space, giving loose order to a presenUy nondescript area - preserve the views of VaihMountain and Gold Peak, screening out the parking lot impact - due to topography, allow for belowgrade parking under the infill bullding, with rear-access service 10. Plaza linkage across E. Meadovv Drive uniung commercial area. Feafure area paving, planters, kiosks, benches, etc. Further study needed, integral to infill development in *19. 11. Bus shelter. r\ D. STREET ENCLOSURE While building facade heights should not beuniform from building to building, they shoutdprovide a "comfortable' enclosure for thi street. Pedesbian streets are outdoor rooms whose walls-are formed by the buildings. The shape and feel of these 'rooms' are ireated by tire u.ld"ty . of. heights and massing (three_ dimensional variations) which give much of thevisual interest and pedestrian scale unique to Vail. Very, general rules, about the perception ofexterior spaces have been develooed(empirically) by designers, based on the characteristics of human vision. They suggest that: an external enclosure is most comfrortable where its .walls are approximately % as high as the width of the space enclosed; if the ratio falls to k or less, the space seems unenclosed; and if the height is greater than the width, it comes to resemble a canyon. I il il i1 il ii tl 1l il :l Materials Wood balconies are by far the most common' Vertical structural members are the most dominant visually, often decoratively sculpted' Decorative wrought iron balconies are also consistent visually where the vertical members are close enough to create semi-transparency' Pipe rails, and plastic, canvas or glass panels should be avoided. Construction Cantilevered beams, beams extended to support the balcony, are most often visibly exposed on the underside of balconies. As such hey are an expression of structure and tie the balconies to the building visually. 23 ar3€s6s9\ ?Ecoe ooct Attn: From: CC: Attached Please Find: _Progress Prints Specifications x Plans Shop Drawines Other The ltems Listed Above Are: For Review and Comments x For Your Use x As Requested _Returned After Review Other inarks: Elisabeth, These drawings show the changes that where needed per the request of Chad Salli at the Public Works Department. We have also made changes to the lobby design per the request of the DRB. We did find that there are currently portions of building that are with the 20' setback. We based our new design off of that existing encroachment. lf you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. Thank you, James ir.l:ii,r i \,..ri: \',]i,.\ l)|,,, l,;ii|r1q, i l I t,l i .ri, rii.ltf rili , lr. ""r, .l i,1,ll . I ri , ' .i;ir .l'rrll i. riri' ji.r'i.!il.rJ\ iIi.r i\ii, \'\',!,', \.:ti,lli i1,iI i.. i ',,1 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Monday, February 13, 2006 TOV Community Development Elisabeth Eckel James Ohlson 9 Vail Road FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCH ITECTS VAIL, COLORADO EtrGEr"=n fil FEB 1s 2006 U TOWN OF VAILTo: Re: Item No.No. of Copies Description 1 4101 with changes per Public Works 2 1 A2O1 wl changes per DRB request. - 9 Vail I From: 'James Ohlson'<johlson@ailarchitects.com>To: <eeckel@vailgov.com> Date: 0211012006 9:07:42 AMSubiect: 9 Vail Road Elizebeth, I have attached an updated site plan and first floor plan. We found on the survey that there are portions of the building that are currently in set back. With lhe new design we are still encroaching into the setback but only as far as the existing building does. The site plan attached has changes made per a meeting wlth Chad Salli. lwill forward the site plan to him for review as vwll. lf you need a paper copy of the drawings let me know and I will drop them off on Monday. I will be out of the office from 11 :00 through the end of the day. lf you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. Thank pu, James Ohlson Fritzlen Pierce Architects 1650 East Vail Valley Dr. #C-1 Vail, CO 81657 p:970476$M2 f:9704764901 johlson@vailarchitects.com ..#.', if; -*- ,am lflt i'-- i l fr ll5i'*rfl!tl$ ll 5tr; 1$ il Itil 3t 9 VAIL ROAD Y^rvtt cr?frD fir.5lc vaL c(}l Gtro d65r r|.t t \:fry t g zqrlr oo$anol Tv}ulr .Nr rjranl^ nv clvou llvn 6 tl il il zll<tJIILll MI 8ilJtlll-ll. Fili @ *r re? L' p it;n t:l i i;ilirlEl -sh rf, * ! i' is i liTriv/)/ -J Status: I Approved Gouuuuw DEvELopMENT Rourttc Fonm I Approved with conditions S Denied Routed To:Chad Salli. PW Date Routed:01/18i06 Routed By:Elisabeth Eckel Date Due:01t25t06 Description of work:expansion of main lobby requiring variance request from DRB, site changes Address:13 Vail Road LeEal:Lot:I Block:Subdivision:Vail Valley 2no filing Gomments:Date Reviewed: 1/25/06 Need additional review bv Fire 1 . 4% maximum centerline grade for 1"' 1 0 feet from back of walk for vehicular access per Town t'. at Lcgal dcxription: Lot-l-2 ,tAddrcss I5 Vft ZONE CHECI( Filing Phonc Phonc Proposcd usc .P ZO,+ z,s -I,lt"2-. '06 BlockA'+-lt L-/ Onncr Architcct Zonc Lot sizc Total GRFA Primary GRFA * t(ftt + (425) (67i* + 6'7 5 = 425 crcdit plus 250 addition ddition is uscd wirb thic '"qri Horv much .of tlc al Sitc Covcragc Hcigbt {/s.,ur.s Front Sidcs R$r th/)o , Minimum .'Ur)!4 20' L:rdscaping RcainingWall Hciglts Conrplics rvitb TOV Lighting Ordinancc Arc finishcd gradcs lcss than 2:l (50%) | ) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >30%) 2) Floodplain 3) Wctlands 4) Watcr Course Sctback (30) (50 5) Gcologic Hazards a) SnorvA b) Rockfall c) Dcbris Florv involvc a 250 Addit'i t' t a' /furwrry- Saau kata,ls,wrdjU-- l!,tto /, blL nu6pxa7 (ok) Rq""cd l{4 ____-*1]0ulG00xee0){1aD ._--_ Pcrmittcd SloDc t//'/- ' - Yes-- No lww ftu7lP6 Enr.i ronm cn laL4lazards Pro'ious conditions ofapproval (chcck propcrfy flc); Is thc propcrfy non-conforming? Dcscribc: v,, 4 No % Proposcd Slopc =--__% Parking ItIfTW /S ruor fffv{W fu fft/h.- Buildablc Arca Eascmcnts Topograpby l00yr. floodplain Environmental Hazards Trees Utiliry Iocations Spot clcvations / ,^" -{ cotorw^t*a, / - RoofPitch 6 r.l.voscerE pr-Alr ,/ JCatc tJt- Building Height / En"ro "h^ns -/ s"ta^u, --/. ;urcouenga( t zFavcsl}vcrhangs (4) -1 P..Stralconics 4 oorrconncction Eisting rccs Proposcd fces Lcgcnd MISCEL US Utili ty-verifi cati on form Plotos of,sitc Buil ding matcriil samplcs r-.v. vcnltcagon Sun\Shadc AngJcs Utilities (un d crgrorrn rl) Vicrv Corridors ?.'(/ vui^ccs ( UVtt tp ".t KryP'o'16'/ fl/ P PIat rcstricions xk )L \ y,) - . Site craac$iopc i/2 gA RchininglVatis I lfr F^"", X,A/ Put,ngauug mf'r4u* gFruuu, v Drivcrvay (access and gndc) WW*.u Firc Access ,*t*^ B{ bPV ,a TOWN OFVAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frantage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www.ci.vail.co.us March 6. 2006 Mr. Bill Pierce Mr. James Ohlson Fritzlen Pierce Architects 1650 E. Vail Valley Drive, flC-1 Vail. CO 81657 Far 970.476.4901 Re: 9 Vail Road Condominiums Minor Exterior Alteration Application (DRBO6OO09) 13 Vail Road/Lot 98, Vail Village 2m Fiting Dear Sirs, Congratulations on Design Review Board's approval on Wednesday, March 1tt, of a final review for an encroachment of the front lobby into the front setback at the 9 Vail Road Condominiums. The Design Review Board attached no conditions of approval I have withdrawn the Planning and Environmenlal Gommission variance request that was submitted simultaneously. Please expect a refund check from the Town's Finance Department within three weeks. Additionally, I have enclosed both the PEC and DRB action forms for your reenrds. Thank you for your patience hesitate to contact me with any remaining questions or concerns. 970.479.2454 enclosures {g *""ouor^rt* --ffi Planning and Environmental Commission ACTION FORM Department of Cornmunity Devdopmert 75 South frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452 web: www,ci.vail,co,us ProrectName: 9VIALROADLOBBYVARIANCE PECNumber: PEC060005 Project Description: FINAL APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE.AN ADDMON TO EXISING LOBBY TOWARD VAIL ROAD - variance request withdrawn; no longer needed since rsriew of setback encroachment within the PA district ls subject to Design Rodew Board review only. Partacipants: OWNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON OUL6I2O06 8542 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES cA 90035 APPUCANT FRI]ZLEN PIERCE ARCHffiCTS 0111617:006 Phonez 970-476$342 1650 EASTVAILVALLEY D& #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 ARCHfiECT FRI1ZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECIS 0LlL6l2W5 Phone: 970-476-6342 1650 EASTVAIL VALLEY D& #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 ProjectAddrcss: gVAILRDVAIL Locationr 9VAILROAD Legal Descrlpdon: Lot: 9-B Blodc SuMivlsion: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 2101-071-0600-1 Comments: BOARD/STAFFACrIOil Motion By: Action: WITHDRWN Second By:Vote: DateofApproval: Conditions: Cond:8 (P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review commlttee(s). Cond: 300 PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days followlng the date of approval. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel PEG Fee Paid: $500.00 .. /t , /b uoum Frontage Koad, vall, colorado 6165/ I ',1 AN'i'\'/ tel: 970'479'2139 tax:970'479'2452 lly.r. V,/. \ web: www.vailgov.com ttnr T''rP/eeiierat Information: ^n l\\!U'\' ,l /t' Nl projects requiring Planning and Environmental commission review must receive approvat prior to submitting a ,.1'l J, ,a|Jlf ' building permit application. Ple6e refer to lhe submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. ll|),, ,\ trtlt d rl An application for Planning and Environmenlal Commission review cannol be accepted until all .equired information if N\iy lU\- is received by the Community Development Department. The projecl may also need to be reviewed by the Town I JJ' ,, Council and/or the Design Review Board.4P JN" .l'uilI \ fyp" of Application and Fee: " hf'' { , ,il\, . Rezoning $1300 . Conditional Use permit $650 i\il$ \ . Major Subdivision $1500 . Ftoodptain Modification $400 I u \ Minor Subdivision $6s0 . Minor Exterior Atteration $650, \ Exemption Ptat $650 . Major Exterior Alteration $SOO l, Minor Amendment to an SDD $1000 . Development plan $1500 I\ , ' New Special Development District $6000 . Amendment to a Development Plan $250 il V , . Major Amendment to an SDD $6000 . Zoninq Ccjde Arnendment $1300 U \ . MaiorAmendmenttoansDD $12s0 () vaaaie $s00/t \ (no erterior modifications) - Siqn Variance $200 '), \. ,tu twT'1. \'p1v( u/u" l? -1A 'b J "v'tr .. 1& Apptication for Review by the -&tl wP|anningandEnvironmenta|GommissioiECElvED f$l,fNfifmllp DepartmentorcommunityDeveropment JAN 16 flF .. ri . 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657.h ^.,\tN/ / tel 97O 479 2139 tav. e7n 479 rAA, it t (no extenor modifications) -. Sign Variance $200 (v . ,et,l\P \rll lfl",f,\$} Descriptionof theRequest AVo'T,oF 7a EyKtnt+ b*gy Ta,,^>+A\$u,{\\n V*r, F,aAs l\t ; \\ l\1",vLocationofthePropos"t,t-ot{FB|ock:-suooiui,ion.V@ physicatAaareds: flNarr?.r,nt.Varv . L0 4,t h.f j x) oor oo o CtlParcef No.: ? t otcZ p6oat- o28 (Contact Eagle Co. Assesor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: Rrtser Acr^r,raep,q-rraV DS tRt5T Name(s) or owner(s): l Vat R.ot C^-,n - l u- (C.itu 4*"ns"or **) Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: Mailing Address:Lo 6l Phone: q70'41b- /=342 $H ,\I}' $\}f || Mt"' Location of the-Proposal: E-mail Address: 06 Holiday House Condominium Association (dba 9 Vail Road Condominiums) 9 Vail Road PO Box 5733 Vail, Colorado 81658 Januarv 12.2006 Town of Vail Planning Commission and Design and Review Board As Managing Agent for the Holiday House Condominium Association dba 9 Vail Road, I have been asked to convey to the Town of vail Planning commission and also the Design and Review Board that the Association's Board of Directors has approved of the construction project which is curently being designed and accordingly submitted for the interior and exterior renovation of the buildins located at 9 Vail Road. Board President L ,4.*<-'.-l , j.* ! Gwen Scalpello 970 476-1788 9 Vail Road Managing Agent Ptarmigan Management t:/'|/J,e a" { y'-L.// L,__ 970 476-3328 Lynn trilzlen. AlA. Afrhtiecl Willinm F. F!ei"ce, Arcflit{ct K.rl hy l'{eslirrqir, l}r sire:: s Manager January 12,2006 FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS VAIL, COLORADO NARRATIVE FOR APPLICATION FOR SETBACK VARIANCE 9 VAIL ROAD, LOT B, VAIL VILLAGE 2ND FILINC DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF VARIANCE The subject Property is zoned Public Accommodation and the Applicant is requesting ref ief from the 20 foot setbacks described in Section 12-7 A-6- The applicant desires to expand the current one story Lobby on the east side on the existing Building, along Vail Road. The proposed expansion is above portions of the parking level of the existing Building. The encroachment is about 80 square feet. At the time the Building was erected the setbacks were I 5 feet. Both the existing Building and proposed expansion are more than I 5 feet from the property line. The maximum height of the proposed expansion in the encroachment is l5 feet.,# Section 12-7A-6 provides for variance to the 20 foot setbacks if the following criteria are met: A. The proposed setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian, geologically, and other environmentally sensitive areas. B. The proposed setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Urban Design Cuide Plan and Design Considerations. C. Proposed setbacks provide adequate light, air and open space. D. The proposed expansion is not adjacent to any other private property and is compatible with uses on adjacent properties. E. The proposed setbacks will result in a creative solution to identification of the Building entrythat could not be achieved without relief from the 20 setback. The DRB, during Conceptual Review, encouraged the Applicant to enhance the arrival sequence to the Building. The existing "front door" is concealed by the existing building when approached from the main Vail Roundabout, the most common point of access for guests. The proposed addition moves the "front door" to a more visible location. SUPPORTINC STATEMENTS A. The proposed encroachment is not adjacent to any private property. B. In the immediate area, numerous Buildings are within the 20 foot setback. Granting of this Variance would not be granting of special privilege. The encroachment extends only to the existing foundation wall and is a one- story addition. 1650 [ast Varl V{1ile,l Drive, Fallfid$e C |, Va!1. COlo{ilrlo li} 957 ?,974.476.6342 r: 97$.476.4 901 [: in{a<.vail;: rch it{{l.s.rori www.va:!,ti{hitf,{tr.c0rlt c. D. FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS VAIL, COLORADO There is no detrimental effect on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, or public safety. The proposal complies with many aspects of the Comprehensive Plan, particularly with those provisions requesting upgrading of existing properties. 1650 E.15t Vail valley flrive, Failfidge C'-l , Vail, Coloradc 81657 P.974.4t6.631? f: 970.476"490 i t: info(Ova ilil rrilite{ls.{r)rl www.vai la!'chil€{Is.cofi Page I of I . .'tZ-ZA-6: SETBAGKS: In the PA district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be twenty feet (20'), and the minimum rear setback shall be twenty feet (20'). At the discretion of the planning and environmental commission and/or the design review board, variations to the setback standards outlined above may be approved during the review of exterior alternations or modifications (section 12-7A-12 of this article) subject to the applicant demonstrating compliance with the following criteria: A.Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. B.Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail village urban design guide plan and design considerations. C.Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. D.Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. E.Proposed building setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not othenivise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. (Ord. 23(1999) $ 1: Ord. 50(1978) S 2) http ://www. sterlingcodifiers. com/COAy'aiv I 600700 1 000006000.htm 11t412006 t t e.r#i;g t'"\-, gITE PLAN \ 9CALE, '-3O-O', o t5' ?o 60' ,>.1 ir-.-, \.. r9r9 00/ton1 5f C]VOU IIVN 6- a N =[<tlJtlLll qI P$,1 i/---:\--- rl s[r b? "' t!/! I r; 9lr ! NE 6ovilgJu,r','1 l,vA l,v fSNOH i\vo l-loH i :l . :.,i1: il:. ,i ! . \s\ --L I I !l { I I "\lar{(*! -l II i 1r t , \ \f-\S \ i !' l; ii iiliHH r5eLt o6v!o10 lrv sing o{a ir9rr!,\ lva cvod lvn 6 I! I =ll $il qI lLrl Fllotl oil xilr @ l s rr ! ! m _s s * t9- 9 Vail Road Condominiums J.tn r,.r tv 16, 2Ot)b North Elevation 9 Vail Road Condominiums ldnuary 16, 2006 South Elevation 9 Vail Road Condominiums J,rru,iry 15, 2iXX) East Elevation 9 Vail Road Condominiums l.tl ru"r ry .16, l(XX, West Elevation , CVOU IIVN 6 Ni iiiHH zo F lu -Jtu IFlooi:l zo tr ]UJ tu IF v_oz T !r9(r oordorot 1rv r.n1r oNt l5Ylll^ rrv cvou llvn 5 ili iliHE ll ll il llzll otl trLl >IlulJIrul FIol<l Lllr LIfla Friizlrn, .A.iA, Ar,*il{d:i. l\4!lii:lr t'. P;frr€), Ar{}titi,'(l KaJ:y Heslin;g- llu;irrorr l|,4a:r.i4er FRITZLEN PI ERCE ARCHITECTS VAII, COLORADO Lot H. VAIL VILLACE FILINC 2 VAIL FIRE PROTECTION DIST 42 MEADOW DR vAlL, co 81657 VAILVILLACE FILINC 2 LOT: A Mlla Cortina VAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC s0 s sxrH sT sTE 't480 MINNEAPOL|t MN 55402 VAlt VILLACE FILING 2 BLK:LOT:A & LOT:C SUB:VAIL VILLACE FILINC 2 BLK:- LOT:B Chateau atVail VAIL DEVELOPMENT tLC s0 s srlrTH sT sTE 1480 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 VAIL VILLACE FILING 2 LOT C First Bank of Vail 17 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 VAIL VILLACE FILING 2 LOT 9A Alpine Standard ALPINE VENTURES INC DBA ALPINE STANDARD C/O TAYLOR'S ACCOUNTI NG 1780 KIPLING ST [AKE\ /OOD, CO 80215 VAIL VILLAGE FILINC 2 LOT N Cateway VAIL CATEWAY PLAZA 12 VAIL RD sTE 600 vAtL, co 816s7 VAIL VILLACE FILINC 2 LOT M Daymer Corporation Valder Pndo 100 E, Meadow Drive Vail, CO 816s7 Josef Staufer 746 Sandy Lane Vail, CO 81657 I t:i .1 [as1 V,.:i! Vailr+ |]riit, l.\:iidi+t (- i, \;.::i. Col.rr,:d. , lt: 1i.5i P: ili0-.!7r.{.,141 F: l:l71).ri 76."i(ra) i F: iri fole]ve:lJ r,:.hitt-J s.f0.n \r'1r*'.v;ti iar( :l ti l{i-11.c(rn) aac scHooL1t9 fl.*"",*n r".. LJr2! SPMDDLE CREEX ES SUBDIVISION RESUBDru. LOT D AIL FILING 2 lcDd", lRG acz VAIL VILI-AGE FILINC 27 t5a ; />.-\ 26 tE5 /-- e5tla / ---r-t3t lr. -'5/t I 186 SONI{ENAL' VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project #: ,'-$l Buifding Permit #:_.- -$;; il;'." P"; ;#':Et*og3 ? 97 (M7 9-21 3 5 (l n spection s) Fire Sprinkler shop drawings are required at time of permit submittal and '5 S. Vail, Frontage Rd. Golorado 8 lll (min) stamp. Plan Registration form. Plans must be submitted by a Registered Fire Protection Gontractor. COMPLETE VALUATIONS ERMlT * ** *** * ***** ** * ** *** **** ****** ******** *FOR OFFICE USE ONLy******** i***** 'inlsr; *: it"tr t|) a a CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Assessors Otfice at 970-328-8640 or visit le-countv.com for Parcel # Parcel #1-lrri.. 1'- JobName:, Wu ?>Job Address: g Vit r- CO Legal Description r-otQ(Block:Filing:'74,L VdI U, Fhon 'otlo- 33 Engineer:Address:Phone: DeFiled Location of work: (i.e., floor, unit #, bldg. #) Yf|Fg,tt< L6t€t- Detailed description of work: noD4 €45ruq Dsv ,ffigwp€. Workclass: New() Addition( ) Remodet ( ) Repair"gd Rero-fit( ) Type of Bldg.: Single-family ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: Does a Fire Alarm Exist Yes ( ) No ( )Does a Fire Sprinkler System-Exirt: Yes ( ) ttop4. \\Vail\datarcCev\FORNf S\PERMITS\\- ;r KPERM.t)OC 01124/2002 ' . ,1 {' u r-, l.l ,t (303) 629-0221 (303) 623-7830 2617 West Holden Place, Denver, Colorado . 8O2O4 RONTIER FIRE PI3OTECTION rrrc. DATE: 8_5_05 F|FE PROTECTTON ENGTNEERS AND CONTRACTORS TO: Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail. CO 81657 PHONE: FAX: ATTENTION: plan review RE: Fire Protection for -- Transmitted herewith REMARKS: 9 Vail Road or under separate cover 3 sets of our shop drawings 3 copies of our submittal data copies of our hydraulic calculations copies of for your review and approval application for permit and check no. for your use please return at your eantest convenience , ate: in the amt of . r.lit I :' ,f;{[3,?3r'.f#g* , i! PLANREGISTRATIONFORM Date 8-'i i-- Contractor Registration Numbe r tfr /q* Contractors Na^ y'r! .:ifi{, MailingAddrett E re't J r i| , /{Ct's.iri',i fL <.- zpcode #e$4 Telephone No., Nameof System Test Signature Certification No.(Cenified Fire Suppression Inspector) Jurisdiction Comments (for additional comments use separate sheet) 'rtiStribution: Original copy goes to-D- ivision of Fire Safety upon totalcompletion of form. copy to local fire departrnent..{".!1cor1';ractor and copy tc building owner upon cori,pfetion and sigi_off. - t:: PHONE: (3m)629-0221FAX: (303)623-7830 2617 West Holden Place, Denver, Colorado . 8O2O4 BONTIEIS FIBE PROTECTION rNc. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS Dry Standpipe Equipment Submittal For 9 Vail Road 9 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 80658 h I i't 4&8" *l'{ ,,tir. r. ' TWO.WAV CLAPPER IilAE' An Auxiliary Inlet Connection with 500 G.P.M. minimum inlet capacity. Used to supplement fire protection water supply. Flush design enhances appearance and provides unobstructed passage. SlAlrDARD EoulpmEill: Cast brass body, double clapper inlets, brass plate' adap'. -ters and plugs with chains. Select size and outlet connection by Figure No. sPECIFY ?IIIIEAD ttnd BNAI|DI]|G. 6010-6042 F- c ---lI r----'l-l--T6mlEJ-l!J]F- ^ -_-__{ r- n --1ffiHlffil 15+ /- $fffi?,"6T)mernaD- "Auto. sprinkter'' - "combination standpipe and sprinkler oP?tolrtat FtlttSHE3: PB - Polished Brass PC - Polished Chrome Plated orL u5t:D Y BOA|ID OF Jttl'fDAlD3 AlrD APFllla lF ROrrlD TWO.WAY CLAT'FER IITILEI WIIH STLLCOCI( An Auxiliary Inlet Connection with 500 G.P.M. minimum inlet capacity, flangs hole for sillcock connection. Used lo supplement fire water supply enhances appearance and provides unobstructed PB PC I I Sillcock connection, adapters and plugs chains. Select size and outlet connection by Figure iio. spECtFy ?trRGID BNAl|DING. BRAr|Drilc: "Stanopipe"Auto. Sprinkle/' - "Combination Standpipe and Sprinkler Systems" SIaI'IDARD E(lut1'mEl|t: Gasl brass Brass Chrome Plated F- c ----l I +-----------J I Iff-'.' ,^:i..'1 |[-i-/ ti-J iE5UJ]F-- r ---lro -iffi-I l\ i? yiTl iE--ffi31 F-- .E _- Fo--l E n ldouble clapper inlets, plate with hole for ul Lt3tt! rav EOlrD Ot ttrraolrDt lr|D tP9llra rt9EolrlD Page G-g Wheatland Schedule 40 Pipe Page I of\ i Wheatland ASTM A-53 Schedule 40 Pipe Wheatland Steel pipe is made by specialists who understand that it's the small details that make the difference between average producb and superior products, At the Wheatland Plant most department heads and foremen have been employed in some phase of pipe manufacturing for 25 or more years. This kind of specialization, experience and knowledge pays off.,.in workable, threadable, uniform pipe. Delivered clean. Delivered promptly. Wheatland specializes in manufacturing black and hot dipped galvanized welded steel pipe in 1/2" through 6" nominal sizes. Available inventory in 1/8 to 12 pipe sizes produced to various ASTM standards is maintained to meet your pipe requirements. UL Listed & FM Approved - Wheatland ASTM A-53 Pipe is UL Listed and FM Apffied, sizes 1" through 6" nominal, for use in Fire Sprinkler Pipe Applications' ir+ , Care, pride and personal concern are bonus features that go into every inch of Wheatland Priie. Don't settle for less. Make surc it's quality. Make sure it's Wheadand. Standard Pipe Schedule 40 llominal Pipe Size Outside Diameter (inches) Inside Diameter (inches) Wall Thickness (inches) I weight per foot (Lbs.) Plain End Threads & Couplings IrrB l .405 .26e ll .068 .24 r/4 .540 i64_ll- "oBB .42 .42 318 .67s .493 .091 .s7 ll .57 I tlz .840 .622 .109 *=__ll .85 314 1.050 .824 .113 1.13 1.13 F1 1.315 1.049 .133 1.68 1,68 t-Ll4 1,660 1.380 140 2.27 2.28 L-Ll2 1,900 1.610 145 2.72 2.73 2 2.375 2.067 2.469 154 3,6s 5.79 3.68 2-L12 2.875 .203 .216 5,82r3.s00 l - 4.000 l-3.068 I 7.58 7.62 3-tl2 l- 3s4B I .2?;6 9.11 9.20 >4 4.500 4.026 .237 10.79 10.89 5 5.563 5.047 .258 t4.62 14.81 htto: //www.wheatland.com/marketing/pipe/sch40.asp 8/4t2005 GROOVED FITTINGS rft?r)\:-/ LISTED protection @@ LISTED APPROVED services request submitt€l GRS 1.3 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS: GAST FITTINGS: DUCTTLE |RON ASTM A536 SEGMENTALLYwELoED Flrrtt{Gs: AsrM A53 oR A135 STANDARD wEtcHT EXcEpr E-9 ts scH 10. FORGE STEEL FITTINGS: ASTM 234 WPB/ASA 816.9 AND ASTM A53 ORA135FlNlsH: RUsr tNHtBtflNG oRANGE PAINT oR Hor DtppED GALVANIZ|NG pERAsrM Als3. FLOW DATA: SEE TECHNTCAL SUPPORT DATA PAGE 4r. WORKING PRESSURE For fire 11/4^ -3"14" - 18' NOMINAL stz € ti,|. cnm) CE NT EN to END lN rmrnr APPROX. WE IGI{T EACH Lbs rx.,r CE NT ER to END lN {mml APPPOX. WE IGH I E ACH Lbs.1r.r) CENIER lo END lNtrrml APPIOX, WE IGH T E ACH Lbs.rol CENIEN fo END lN rmmt APPROX. WE ICHT T ACH Lbs.n<ol CENIER to END lN rnnnl t ,r,1 1t4 32 2J5 70 1.1 1.75 44 0.8 OA 1.75 44 0,80l 1.37 0.5 2.75 12 1ln 40 2.75 70 1.2 05 1.75 44 0,9 OA 1.75 44 1.0 137 0.7 OJ 2.75 1.8 0a2 50 325 2.009 2,00 ol 1.5 0.7 2tn 5l 1.6 o.7 1.37 0.9 OA 325 2.3 102ln 66 3.75 95 2.9l3 225 22 10 2.00 2.1to 150 38 .5 3.75a6 3.0 IAJ rr.u. oc 3.75 3.1 1.4 2.25 .9o MA wA rvA I{/A IVA rvA 3 80 1-25 l08 4.3 20 2.50 64 s,2 2.25 3.1 1A 150 38 2-0 0.9 425 r08 3.6to4t65.00 127 8.7 3.9 3.00 76 5.: 2,6 28771 5.4 2A 1.75u 3.3 1.5 5.00 127 3,7 1,75l2s5.50 140 11.9 325 83 8.2 2.88 73 7,8 2.(x) 5l 5.0 5.50 1&43 2.0665) 166 18.2 3.50 89 1t.0 50 3.12 79 8.3 3A 2.00 5t .5 .9 6,s0 td) 10.7 496.5 0.0.Itu 6.50 r65 15.0 6.8 3.50 69 112 5.1 TI/A tvA NYA rvA TVA I.VA 826 7.75 t97 32.2 t4.6 4.25 l@ 20.4 93 337 98 17.9 8,1 2.00 5l 10,0 7.75 197 20,8 9A10289.OO2A 49.0 4.75 t 2]315 14.3 +75l2l 30.0 l.r,o 2.12u 14.5 6.6 9.002n 29.0 13212 3m 10.00 254 70,0 31.8 5,25't33 44,1 20.o 4.U 124 40.4 18.3 2.25 57 18,7 8.5 10.(x, 2 33,0 r 5.0l4 350 " 2fi8o 18{t.0 8 t.6 *$105.0 47.6 5.00 127 .til,0 I9.5 3.50 E9 25ll tvA t\YA 16 4@ * ndo 2m,o 99.8 *r9 o 11s.0 52.2 5.00 127 5(l.0 22.7 4.00 1U2 42.O 19,r wA N/A 184g * troo9o 280.0 127,O * tl#t 1it5.0 65.8 5.50 140 60.0 27.2 4s0 t14 s0.0 22,7 IyA t\YA 20 5@ * 38590 ir50.0 158.8 * 13ifl 180.0 I r.6 6.00 i52 70.0 31.8 5.00 t27 65.0 295 hl/A IVA 24 6m * tto9o 480.0 217.7 * t*90 2il.0 I l3l . 7.00- t78 105.0 47.6 6.00 152 95.0 43.1 rvA wA SW = SEGMENTALY WELDED STEEL* FORGE STEEL DRAIN ELBOW HAS A STANDARD 1" FEMALE NPT OUTLET DRAIN ELBOW IS SGH 1O STEEL PIPE Page 6 GROOVED COUPLINGS @ LISTED protection @@ LISTED APPROVED services requost submittal GRS 1.3Forfire MATERIA- SPECIFICATION : HOUST NGS: DUCTILE IRON CONFORMING TO ASTM 4536BOLTS: OVAL NECK TRACK BOLTS PER ANSI/ASME 818.10. STEEL PER SAE J429 GMDE 5. THREADS PERANSI 81.1 UNIFIED STANDARD COARSE CLASS 24. ZINC ELECTROPLATED PERASTM A164.NUTS: HEAVY HEX PER ANSI/ASME 818.2.2, STEEL PER SAE J995 GRADE'2' ORASTM A563 GMDE "A" OR "B'. ZINC ELECTROPLATED PER ASTM A164. C.3 COUPLINGS USE HEX FLANGE LOCK NUTS. STEEL PER ASTM A194. ZINC ELECTROPLATED PER ASTM A164.GASKET9: EPDM OR NITR|LE (SEE PAGE 33 FOR TECHNTCAL DATA) FINISH : RUST INHIBITING OMNGE PAINT OR HOT DIPPEO CELVNHIZII.IG PERASTM A-153. THE C-4 RIGID COUPLING IS LIGHT WEIGHT, ECONOMICAL AND DESIGNED FOR RIGD PIPING APPLICATIONS. CAST IN PLACETEETH BITE INTO THE PIPE/ FITTING SHOULOER TO FIRMLY RE. STRICT 'VOVEMENT.@l WOP K INC P .S.t./ PIPE END WE |eHT E ACII 1. Working pressure and/orend load are toblallowable, based on standard weight steelpipe, rollorcut grooved. 2. One time field test pressure may be incGased to 1.5 times the figures listsd above. ' 3. \ brking pressures on other pipeschedules may b€ found on page 42. - CONTACT STAR PIPE PRODUCTS FOR SIZES LARGER THAN 12" Page 2 , tt';\(., INCORPOMTED "% Fig. 200"Trimline, eajuitabte Band Hanger Size E_ange_ 1/2thru 8 inch pipe.yhld . Carbon Steer, ruii.Glivanizeo to G_eospecifications. f',fi:39 *il,lf :f'l*':: Id-other sen era I pipins adj ustrne nt aft e r i n staltralt9ii nu t des i g n p ermits ha n g er Featur€s . (1/2 tfuu 2 inch) Flarpip€_ty.pe1andoti;;i?S"',ff ?1":?i,"r,fJarationrorarabrasion. Captured de separating ,1116 6"no"lt'g.l-!leps adjusting nut from around pipe. - r' nanger is easily installed !z-tQt\ru.8 inch) Spring.tension on nut hotds it :trff y#|""ff erberoriinstarr"ii"i.'iirlilii"'!""rt'. Approvds _ Undenlriters, Laboratories Listed (1/2,,.,... thru 8') in the U.S. (UL( e*:fy: '-'#; ;#'"|30'3ilf" t"'u tor sieet F:3*iT#rilH*g{,+.g''.-,,,it#:i$'#r,, Manufacturers Standan ySxjn_\un Temperatut {1fi'?;#t;3:i;;'f et""t'int"'"steermateriarsurder By_ Figure number and pipe size. APPROX. WT3/4 1 8mm oil 8mm or lomm 3-t/8 3-1/8 2-5t8 2-1/2 2-5t8 T2THRU 2INCH PIPE noo stze 1-1 1-1/2 2 2-1/2 400 400 laq. 400 400 400 600 600 3/8 3t8 3t8 3/8 3/8 orl omm orl66E 8mm or iomm 3-7/8 or 1Omm 1t2 10mm lomm 5-7/8 1 '7 1 11 11 122-7, 2-7t8 \' ta 14 to 27 29 34 4 6 I 1/2 1t2 1/2 1omm 12mm 12mm 12mm 7 9-1/8 10-1/8 13- 6-1t4 6-3/4 8-3t4 1000 1250 1250 1250 \tC 66 73 136 .31. Hilti Drop-In Anchor Advantages Shalbw €rnb€dmenl dspth Internal (temale) lhread ,Anchor is flush with base malerial (HDr) IUlaterials Installation I nstructions 1. Adiust Depth Gauge 4. lnstall Setting Tool. f HDI Sjzes: Regular HDI Sizes: Stainless Steel c"ftnr*--.]i9escfttlon Anchor Slze Overall Length Hitti-ffi --ffi- Length Quadllty Per box s490048 HDI(SS3ooYr-1l.L_--1tl slan 7ha"100 5490056 HDI (SS303) s/8 :(1%e'Va'5la'50 ilg0064 HDr (5180€16-'tl2u --\e{*-e'11/re'50 *90072 ---4tr1 (SS3o3) Ye 7e'2etrc"25 --w6{o HDI (SS303) 3L 314'3%e"13hn 25 Hand Setting'licols for HDI Anchors Gatalog No.Descdptlon Sets Anchors Size 5454504 HST 6 Setting Tool Vr'FtDl s54s20 HST 10 Setting Tool {e'HOl 5431530 HST 12 Setting Tool 'Va" HDI 541t536 HST 16 Setting Tool 1s" HDI 5454540 HST 20 Setting Tool 1e'HDIJ @ @;@ Fig. 5l side Beam Bracket ror uFpa Rod And Fastener Sizing Size Frng*3/} and 112 inch rod, 1/2 thru 8 inch pipe' Materhl4arbon Steel.'iii"tirr+nommended for aftaching hanger rod to side of UEa^J or *"lls. Designed to accommodate current rod schedlle and fastener rpElirements per National Fire Frotec'$on Association (NFPA) Pamphlet #13' . .'Aioroalsl)nderwriters' Laboratories Listed in the USA iii[i*c c"n"da (cUL), and Factory Mutual Engineerins Approled. Finisfr-Plain' lriote-AvaitaOle in Electro-Galvanized and HDG finish or Stainless Steel material. OrderBy-+igure number, rod size, and finish' e, ( HOLE SIZE MAX, REC. PIPE SIZE ROD SIZE A 'l12 >2'8 -2-4-6 I 3f 7l 70 3t4 314 a4 3/8 318 112 1t2 2 2 2-112 2-1n 7116 9/16 9i16 11/16 7t16 7116 9/16 9/16 700 700 1250 1250 -2r- eA / V;r,uVtt4" 2'a1/-n'ffi TOI,IN OT I/AITFP General lnformation: Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel 970.479.2139 lax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The I project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. a-, Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences wlthin I' Ioneyearoftheapprovat' .-. - . --r ,-, -. .\- - \a, Description of the Request: Location of the Propos",, ao,, fto"*,su bd ivisi on :]{A*rdr.a*,-AU_6rda- Physical Address: parcel No.: Aab1ld{.o&,! {h- (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) zonins: -AenE- ---Y-Name(s) of Owner(s): t{woq ow Ua Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: Mailing Addressl il"itAdd;,fr.-apqtt,fcf---rax:-S9:-{*1c1- Type of Review and Fee: Plus $1 .00 per square foot of total sign area. For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee $50@ UOCU $300 $250 $20 :dffi* New Construction Addition Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) Minor Alteration (singlejamily/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request lii1= '€ H Fi ,7 'talr'| 9 VAIL ROAD - PROPOSED Status: I Approved Contlnluuw DEVELopMENT Rounruo Fonur ffi Approved with conditions I Denied Routed To:Public Works Date Routed:07t't3t05 Routed By:Elisabeth Eckel Date Due:07t201o5 Description of work:Patio and landscaping changes, exterior building material changes Address:9 Vail Road Leqal:Lot:A I Block: I Subdivision:VailVillase 2- Filing Gomments:Date Reviewed: Need additional review bv Fire Show Limits of disturbance and proper erosion control devices on July 22, 2005 Mr. Bobby Ladd RAL Architects PO Box 1805 Edwards, CO 81632 (Fax) 970.926.4969 Re: 9 Vail Road Conceptual Design Review Application 9 Vail Road/Lot A, Vail Village 2no Filing DR8050325 ilLE ErJPr Dear Bobby, Thank you for attending Wednesdays Design Review Board hearing during which the Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the proposal for several e)derior changes at the aforementioned location. For your convenience, I have summarized the Board's comments and suggestions below: ' Several of the members on the Board mentioned the visual appeal of the horizontally-placed bamwood siding that currently exists on the exterior of the building. . The stucco was viewed as an overall good addition, but the Board suggested that since its texture will be quieter than that of the siding that exists, some attention should be paid to enhancing the entryway to the building as much as possible. . Regarding the entry, the Board suggested several means of enhancement: I the inclusion of a mural on the eastem fagade;. the addition of more distinctive window treatments;. the addition of heavier materials on the overhangs or fascia (which Ms. Scalpello mentioned would not be possible);. another method of enhancement that might be preferable to the applicant and strengthen the entry as much as possible. . Finally, the Board suggested that the entry door be replaced with a door that is more consistent with the Bavarian sgle of the proposal. Please feel free to call me with any questions regarding final submittal materials. I will look fonrvard to seeing the final plans as soon as they have been submifted. Thank you, as always, for your patience in what is not always a simple design review process. Best Regards, Elisabeth Eckel 970.479.2454 cc: Mrs. Gwen Scalpello PO Box 160 Vail, CO 81658 (fax) 479-7330 Hey you. I am not able to get the routing form to clear from the previous comments. Here 1ou go. I can also bring a copy of the letter for the architect if you wish. 1 . Relocation of the fire department connection. Inaccessible since construction of planter. We can meet to discuss allernate locations. 2. 9 Vail Road Condominium Association is has been issued a letter that states in part "The system is hereby declared defective so as to constitule a clear and present danger''. In short, we are not going to approve further cosmelic or physical changes at this property until such a time that we see measureable progress on both the fire alarm and relocation of F.D. connections. You may share this email with the architect, or if you wish have him contact myself or Mike M. He will be out of the office until early next week. Let me know how you wish to proceed. Mike. >>> Elisabeth Eckel0712712005 3:21:37 PM >>> Hi Mike: Just a brief e-mail to follow up the conversation that we had this morning. Exactly what does 9 Vail Road need to do to be in compliance with the Fire Code prior to receiving any design review approvals for their proposed exterior changes? | promised the architect I would give him some specific feedback to work from. Thanks in advance. I have attached the routing form for your convenience. Elisabeth From: To: Date: Subject: <gscalpello@attglobal.net> RAL Architects <ralarch@vail.net> 07l29l2OOS 9:18:15 AM Re: Fwd: Re: I Vail Road Don't sweat the response from the fire department. Both issues are in the process of being addressed. Frontier Sprinkler s!€tems will work on the standpipe and hose access connections in two weeks. We have already paid a deposit to Acme Alarm for work on the fire alarm system. l'll be sending a formal response to Mike McGee, who has been out this week. Gyen ML Architects wrote: > Hey Gwen, > | received this from Elisabeth today. She had a departmental meeting and > told me she would get something in writing as to what the Fire Department > is going to require in order for us to proceed with the plans. > | will respond to your other email tomorrow. l've been on the run the past > two days and am still, but should have time tomorrow to answer all your > questions. > Thanks. > Bobby Ladd > >X€riginal-To: ralarch@vail.net > >Delivered-To: ralarch@vail.net > >X-ASG-Debug-lD: 1 1 22501 0&-22730-5-0 > >X-Barracuda-URL: http://65.38.1 28.1 94:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi > >X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.0 > >Date: Wed,27 Jul 2005 15:50:15 -0600 > >From: "Elisabeth Eckel" <EEckel@vailgov.com> > >To: <ralarch@vail.net> > >X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: 9 Vail Road > >Subject: Re: 9 Vail Road > >X-Virus-Scanned: by VailNet Spam Firewall at vail.net > >X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -0.41 > >X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-0.41 using per-user scores of > >TAG LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BAYES_0S > >X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.02, rules version 3.0.2785 description >>lo5% > >Hi Bobby: > >Here are the comments, verbatim, that I received in writing from the > >Fire Department today regarding what will need to occur at 9 Vail Road > >prior to any approvals being granted. Please let me know if further > >clarification is necessary. Thanks! > >1 . 'Roloc€tion of the fire department connection. lnecc€sslble since > >constuction of planter. We can meet lo discuss alternate locations". > >2. I Vall Road Condominium Association is has been issued a letter > >that states in part The syEtem is hereby dedared defective so as to > >constitJte a dear and present darqe/'. In short, we ar€ not going to > >apprwe further cosmetic or ph!6ical changes at ihis property until such > >a time thatu,e see measurable progr€ss on boh ftefire alerm and > >relocation of F.D. connections". > >Elisabeth > >Elisabeth Eckel > >Planner, Torm of Vail > >75 S. Frontage Road > >Vail, CO 81657 >470.479.24iloic > >97O.479.2452fax GG:< Eeckel@vailgov.corn > Project Name: HOLIDAY HOUSE PARKING Project Description: Patticipants: DRB Numben DR8050037 Location: Nine Vail Road WV'/la7-$1,tT *- /Jzriaal /lawao Design Review Board ' /rf fA ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontaqe Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel : 970,479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us OWNER VAIL ASSOCIATES LTD 6711 MONROE ST STE A SYLVANIA oH 43560 License: APPUCANT Nine Vail Road Condo Assoc 02/03/2005 Phone: 479-l7BB 9 VAIL ROAD Vail, CO 81558 License: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Common Element -add 4 new spaces with heated concrete pavers (Pavestone - Old Town Blend/Denver in Plaza I/II/Giant Heritage Random pattern) to Meadow Drive side of 9 Vail Road Condominiums. Relocate garage sensors, add new stone veneer wall with 02/03/2005 Phone: Lot 9-B Block: .Subdivision: HOUDAY HOUSE 210107106026 see conditions Project Address: Legal Description: Parcel Number:_ Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Second By: Vote: Co.nditions: Rogers Mathias 4-0-0 Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 03/16/2005 Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0007027 qi . The applicant shall assure that the wall is constructed with a finish to match the , . ' existlng river rock wall and associated cap located at the east side of the 9 Vail Road Condominiums. Entry: 04/1{2005 By: ee Action: AP.., Cond: CON0007028' Prior to requesting a final inspection of the project from the Community Dwelopment Department, the applicant shall assure that all utility boxes and Fansformers located to the north of the proposed wall are painted gray. Entryt 04lLL/2005 By: ee Action: AP Planneru Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: 320.00 l *m Additions-Residential or Commercial Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 97 0.479.2139 tax: 97 0.479,2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit the submittal requiremenb for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approvat. Description of the Request: Fls#HiVi*[.i l-[t-] iJ rl i:i5 T'EV.GSM.SEV. Location of the Proposal : ult?'9 etocr: Jl Physical Address: Parcel No.: Zoning: Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s):I (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) 4tl*, t oa-l Phone:tt'7 o lt.! /.lot, brt'l 4ause C bdfl,u/,rn {J<snt a Va-'t il^, Vd $s0 No Fee $6s0 $300 $2s0 $20 C*"ti*q /ai/G*"l* Name of Applicant: Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs tr Conceptual Review tr New Constructiontr Addition E Minor Alteration (multi-family/com mercial) fl Uino, Alteration- (single.family/duplex) D Changes to Approved Plans n Separation Request KKK{n rlF For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 25b additions & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee Page 1 of 12104128104 I { 'i Status: I Approved GOMUUHFY DEVELoPMENT Rounxc Fonnn ! Approved with conditions fr Denied Routed To:Public Works Date Routed:03/02t05 Routed Byr Planner Date Due:03/02/05 Description of work:Request for the addition of 4 new parking spaces Address:9 Vail Road Legal:Lot: l98 lBlock:Subdivision: I VailVillaqe 2"o Filinq Comments:Date Reviewed: lssues.Need additional review ly / Show spot elevations for proposed driveway at all kei locatidns. ( existino W. Meadow Drive. Utilitv oad elevations. etc... Show spot elevations to show how the new heated drive will malch existing conditions and fulure condilions ol W. Meadow Drive. Show currenl TOV W Meadow Drive streetscape alignment. icant can contact Public Works to obtain a coov of currenl alionment. all dimensions of Show turning movements of vehicles. All turning movemenls shall take place within propeQ How will lhe oroposed oradino etfect the utilities? Show Limits of disturbance and erosion control Wriften approval is required from by the installation of the site (Holy Cross, QrvesQ. Applicant must meet standard set back requiremenls of the ulilily companies for obstructions located near their infraptructurg, easements may be needecs for obstructions located near their infraFtructurg, easements may be needed for utility access to their infrastructure. a//iliorwl Lonfu'fion Public Way Permit from Public Works reouired orior to start of construction. I Heated drive will need to be broken in zones separating private and public property. Right of Way must be on a separate zone than the portion on private property. The portion of drive to be heated in the right of way will need to have separale zones separating the portion of the future W 12' width) and the drive behind the back of walk. Proposed site wall will need to be located lo accommodate future W Meadow Drive sidewalk (12' width). see TOV W Meadow Drive Status: I Approved Couuur.rry DEVELopMENT Rounruc Fonna n Approved with conditions fi Denied Houted To:Public Works Date Routed:02/09/05 Routed By:Planner Date Duel 02t16/05 Description of work:Request for the addition of 4 new parking spaces Address:9 Vail Road Leqal:Lot: l98 Block:Subdivision: I VailVillaqe 2"o Filinq Comments:Date Reviewed: ent lssues. Need additional review Show and proposed qrades of drivewav. Show spot elevations lor proposed driveway al all key (Grade Breaks, corners of W. Meadow Drive. Util Show spot elevations to show how the new heated drive will match existing conditions and future conditions of W. Meadow Drive. show all dimensions of drivewa turning movements of vehicles. All turning movements shall take place within property boundaries. How willthe effect the utilities? Show Limits of disturbance and proper erosion control devices on plan. Show conlours. Status: I Approved COUUuruFY DEVELoPMENT RourIruc Fonna ! Approved with conditions I Denied Routed To:Fire Date Routed:02/09/05 Routed By:Planner Date Due:02t16t05 Description of work:Request for the addition of 4 new parking spaces Address:9 Vail Road Legal:Lot: | 98 | Block: I Subdivision: I VailVillaqe 2no Filinq Comments:Date Reviewed: Need addilional review tPurr"rton" Commercial lPave Stones lPlaza Stone Series Fn|E SrlOiE$ Flnza Stone $eries All products are not available in all markets; check with your local Paveslone Manufacturing Office for product svailability. Plaza Sbne Scfies Plaza Slone is a timeless paving stone with an impressionistic embossed surface proflle. lt creates a genfle and warm effect by combining the soft curved edges of the rectangular and square stones. Plaza Stone is available in many colors and in standard or Heritagem Series (tumbled) finish to accommodate the most discriminating tastes and desires. Plaza Stone uses large-scale patterns to create interest and drama to commercial landscaping, while the stone's texture and paftern harmonize wilh sunounding buildings and site furnishings. Composition and Manufacture Plaza Stone is made from a "no slumD" concrete mix. Made under extreme pressure and high frequency vibrations, Plaza Stonen has a compressive strength greater than 8000psi, a water absorption maximum of 5% and will meet or exceed ASTM C-936 and freeze-thaw testing per Section I of ASTM C-67. Heritagen Series may not comply with ASTM C-67 freezethaw durabil itv. APPLICATIONS Sidewalks . Garden Pathways . Patios . Esplanades . Medians . Plazas . Terraces . Pool Decks . Gazebos . Porte Cache Enhancements . Hotel Entrances . Residential Drivewavs . Golf Cart Paths . Pedeslrian Malls Plaza Stone is available in eight (8) sizes. Page I of4 PRODUCT INFORMATION http ://www.pavestone.com/commerciaVpaver_plaza I . html 2/2312005 ickness 60mm B0mm = 3 1t8* Rectangle Stone (60mm = 2 U8" & 80mm = 3 1/8") 138mm x 208mm = 5 716- x 8 3/16"* (60mm = 2 3/8" & 80mm = 3 1/8") 138mm x '138mm = 57t'16"x57i16^ Plaza | (60mm= 2v8") Square - 138mm x 138mm = 5 7/16" x 5 7/16-' Roctrngle - '138mm x 208mm = 5 7l'16" x I 3h6"* Sq.rlg. Rec. Bundled Together @s 3/4 Roc./Half Square bundled Together 60mm Pcs./pallet 80 SM. REC. 560 1/2 SQ.Wt./pallet 2800 lbs. Sq.Ft./pallet 100 Large Citcls - 138mm x wedge = 5 7/16" x wedge* Small Circle - 138mm x wedge = 5 7/16'x wedge* (Right and Left) 3f4 Rectangle - 138mm x 103mm = 57h6'x41116 Lg. & Sm. Cilcle/ U4 Rec. bundlod togsther 60mm Pcs./oallet 300 LG. ctR 300 sM. REc. 120 SM.C|R. L 120 SM. CtR. R Wt./pallel 2856 lbs. Sq.Ft./pallet 102 Giant Plaza (60mm = 2 3/8') 278mm x 208mm = 10 15/16" x I3/16- Giant R.c. Only 60mmWt./Piece 17.41 lbs. Pcs./Sq.Ft. 2.28 Pcs./pallet 160 Wt./pallet 2828 tbs. Sq.Ft./pallet 101 f'-*il :9,";l--q " Pavestone Commercial I Pave Stones ] Plaza Stone Series Page 2 of4 INSTALLATION PATTERNS http ://www.pavestone.com/commerciaVpaverjlazal .html 212312005 Paveslone Commercial I Pave Stones I Plaza Stone Serics Page 3 of4 rl *- . rll - .1. rl. :l rl 'I :Ll t :l' ,3. :l;t :t.l- 'J ,l- 'l-'l \) rl, ll & Giqnl Heriloge'" R Plaza Stone HeritagerM Series is sold on pallets or in bags. There is approximately the same square feevpallet in each bagged producl affer lumbling. Packaging may vary from plant to plant. Contact your Pavestone Company manufacturer for packaging details, Plozo ll Heritoge'" Runner Bond Plqzo | & ll Herifage'" Rondom Plczo I Heriloge'n'Musler 'K Plozo Fon - | -,rl -l -,- _T- I I. J: .t 'I -_r[ http :/iwww.pavestone.com/commercial/paverjlazal .html 212312005 'Product Colors I Denver, CO I Denver Pavers 2 f >aF r. ,: f-i1C'-i ..tFaR!,iA-i. l SEND TrllS PAGE TJ A FRiEND OR COLIIAGUE http://www.pavestone.com/commercial/prod colors denver p2.html ttr:ri!irlir:IIt fri Page I of2 Denver, CO Manufacturing Facility $tandard Pave $tone Colors ttl il:lil :l -i.:.i:-.- { _t.i;rr !.,.-.i-r*-.._-4. - i i i f !,-l f---j [,, .-- i, i I i . ,..,.r i , i. , I I I r .+4- { -- i l;-ii l. -.i , ,( OLD TOWN BLEND - D*viurr PEWTER - l)r:rrlrr'-r i i i i i r- I ' i- l- i-r-+ t f- , i i i i " i .iirJlli:lliii l-i_ tl, iir -- T- I- i , ri:l :, '; i i - ;l=-.-i i l--_-l ;i l"r ; I t-*--=,l-.*l i-J----.l-i t; I i i-1,',-it.{I.[:JIr : ill THREE TONE BftO$/l{ - fjr,nf r.' WINTER ELEND - Dl vr' { Pre.v rLr= Fage ,t,2 BACK TO MANUFACTURING FACILITIESIPRODUCT COLORS 212212005 I )t I I \ \ ,) .;ii" ,' ,'-1. ,"'1. ).."..'1,: ii,hl ,' "':.t:. ..i {; l ,' ;) .. -t ..1,t:1, /, ; ,r4r I ,idl\ I #1,/ "' =l " /=i" ,/"\ ry4 1+ l'J$ffi 3 + -;\ i, i ,o-,?'i- t \:ri'".rr; Itirii ., ,,,/ i ' f ''-' r-T\in+'91,'| !)'.!,i 0r 16 )--- - -,r';) .i :; 4r+ iiiL |",-/l /i i' :t lrl':,, I x :j- t >g'/ 46 / t.D, lo ''l-' \,.,, \,i',y . '1 /, ;, /\A' r'^..(tl.9' , ,/ \-'/ \ i:,' / / i,./i'i/ 1 ':/ r/ 't'/i / t''; / ii.".,ti../ ,.Ni, ar:it=N iiir =ililz ,i ,rll q t +) ,' ': i)' .,:., -{: ltJi ,/' ,, '/ z/' /71 < I = ,t^ n 414.t= = 5 E s-lF 3 5 o-P *- t a at3 rgg 6-,'ao- >R B.o-' 3 ="€i:* eo oa r' 6Hb* c) f. { z =Jo g no 0,o-oo Jo-o =. ql E' 3 :F-?oNO--oXEH& rigXff{ .:3 i='aB E si i+asSAESi 4=ii -=' 'q =S {bJ, 4' it .'/ .-l '-t ?-E3a !rxcl 6-< -q 4' il .1 -7 ,F\ s# s sN^\h v/ S r (/1, $rd $F \ '+' ''i 1' ,I! aa a. Depaltment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www.vailgov.com March 2, 2005 Mr. Tim Losa Zehren and Associates, Inc. PO Box 1976 Avon. CO 81620 (lax) 970.949.1080 Re: 9 Vail Road application for additional parking spaces DRB05-0037 Dear Tim, Thank you for attending today's Design Review Board public hearing of the a-bove-referenced application. As you know, the application was tabled by the Design Review Board until March 1{, 2OO5,with direction to further explore with the appropriate utility companies the amended placement and/or screening of the transformer and electrical equipment. The Design Review Board is particularly concerned with this application due to its very visible location within a highly-utilized area ot Town. However, the Board commented quite favorably on the idea to install a rock wall for screening purposes and also felt that the amount of landscaping being proposed was adequate for this tight location. Per our conversation this afternoon, I will be in touch with Jefi Vroom at Holy Cross before the week is over to communicate these concerns and to see if an agreement can be reached which accommodates the needs oi g Vail Road, the Four Seasons, and the Town of Vail. I am conlident that an agreeable solution is not too far in the future. Additionally, I have enclosed a list ol the comments lrom the Public Works Department addressing lhe ilems which must be submittg.d prior to any final approval. Because I didn't receive the amended site plan until Thursday, February 24"', today's group meeting was the first time during which their comments (on the ameded plan) could be obtained. Though you and I have discussed some of these items, please be sure that all are addressed within the amended submittal. Hopefully this is information that you have available but thal simply has not yet made it into my hands. As always, please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. In order to be appropriately preparedtortheMarchl6,2005meeting, lmustreceiveall informationbynextWednesday,Marchg'n. lfthat timeline is not gen€rous enough to make changes to the plan, please let me know and we can agree on a more feasible Best {p ^""r"uo "n,"^ 970.479.2454 enclosure: Routing Form from TOV Public Works Department cc: TJ Brink, Vail Development LLC Gwen Scalpello, Holiday House Condominiums: 970.479.7330 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Calorado 81657 970-479-2I38 FAX 970-479-2452 www.vailgov.com February 16,2005 Mrs. Gwen Scalpello PO Box 160 Vail, CO 81658 (fax) 479-7330 Re: 9 Vail Road: new spaces application Lot 9-8, Vail Village /o Filing DR8050037 Dear Gwen, Thank you for submitting an application for Design Review Board review of the proposal to locate four new parking spaces along West Meadow Drive. In response to our recent conversations both this morning and last week, I thought it best to detail the series of events that have transpired regarding this application and its processing. An application cover sheet was submitted for a f,nal Design Review Board review on February 2nd, 2005, in time for lhe March 2"d,2OOS meeting. The project was then assigned to meit our February 8rh meeting. There was no mention made on the application of a conceptual review nor were there any plans attached to the application. However, after plans from the 2003 review were found in our office and upon our conversations last Friday (the I 1m) you requested that perhaps a conceptual review could be scheduled. I responded that Public Works comments had not been received and I wasn't sure of the possibility that a conceptual could occur. However, on Monday ( the 14h) | placed the application on the agenda as a conceptual review for the February 16h agenoa, subject first to review by the other members of Stall at our upcoming meeting on February 15'n. Staff was concerned that the approvals given in 2003 by both the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council were taking precedence over the concerns of the Design Review Board at that time. The Design Review Board had voiced concerns about a lack ol landscaping and the possible negative impacts that may result for the pedestrian traveling along West Meadow Drive. Because new plans were not submitted as a part ol this application, Statf was skeptical about bringing the project lor review since it was obvious that the Board's initiai concerns had never been addressed. Therelore, it was unanimously decided that the application would remain on the March 2no agenda, as originally scheduled for final review. I have enclosed the memorandum, agenda, and minutes from the June 9, 2003 Planning and Environmental Commission meeting, which also highlight the Design Review Board's concerns during the conceptual reviews that occuned during that same time period. ll there is other information which you might find helptul, please don't hesitate to contact me and I will endeavor to provide that for you. Additionally, you are more than welcome to contact George Ruther, whom I have included in this correspondence, with pressing concerns. {""rr"gUA 7Zr.'t, 970.479.2454 enclosures:Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum, agenda, and minutes (dated June 9, 2003) Copy of most recent application cover page (submined on February 2, 2005) George Ruther; Town of Vail Chief of Planning ijp ^""r.uo r^r"^ doj,' February 16,2005 Ms. Elisabeth Eckel Town of Vail Communily Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: 1 - I Vail Road New spaces application DR8050037 2 - Your letler dated February 15, 2005, same subject Condaminiums in Ydil Yilhge Formerly the Holiday House Dear Elisabeth: It appears thal there is some history to this application of which you are unaware and which may be affecting your handling of this application. Allow me to provide some background: 1 - The developer of the Four Seasons, Nicollet lsland Development Company, was required lo relocate 4 parking spaces currently located at the northwest corner of the 9 Vail Road Condominiums (Holiday House Condominium Association) property, 2 - As you have correctly identified, the a joint application from I Vail Road Condominiums and Nicollet lsland Development Company went forward to the PEC June g, 2003 after conceptual reviews with the Design Review Board May 21 and June 4, 2003. The application was for a variance to allow relocation of the 4 parking spaces currently located at the northwest corner ofthe 9 Vail Road Condominiums property to the southwest corner ofthe property adjacent to the driveway access lo the 27 spaces inside the 9 Vail Road Condominiums building, there being no other localion on the property able to contain four parking spaces without introducing a new curb cut on Vail Road. This required a variance, as the 9 Vail Road building technically has two "front setbacks." The PEC did not approve that request. They approved 2 spaces on 9 Vail Road property and 2 spaces in the Four Seasons property with the requirements that the applica'nts: 1. Retum to the DRB for review prior to receipt of a building permit and 2. Revise the application to include only 2 spaces per the staff recommendation that 2 spaces be relocated on I Vail Road property and 2 spaces be located within the Four Seasons property. 3 - 9 Vail Road Condominiums escalaled that decision to Town CouncilJuly 1, 2003. The Town Council made a site visit lo review the space plan. The proposal you have in front of you was lined out in the grass with orange paint as it had been for lhe PEC site visit. There was no confusion regarding the absolute details of the proposed layout. I refer you to the minutes of lhe Town Council evening meeting (aftached) which state: "...Greg Moffet made a molion to modify a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) decision which approved a variance to allow for two parking and loading spaces in the front setback at Nine Vail Road with two other parking spaces to be located within the parking structure of the adjacent Four Seasons Resort. ln modirying the PEC decision, all four parking spaces will be relocated to the Nine Vail Road parking garage entry ofi Meadow drive with a landscaping plan to be approved by the Design Review Board. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0...." This decision, daling from July 1 , 2003 established the variance for 4 parking spaces per the plan you have in front,of you and the effective date of the variance at July 1 , 2003, not the June 9, 2003 date you have been assuming. 4 - October 6, 2003, Nicollet lsland Development Company, I Vail Road Condominiums and the Town of Vail executed a Compromise and Release Agreement which states specifically: -..-ry--- "...Whereas, in connection with the entitlement approval process and as a condition of approval fiown ofl Vail has required that Nicollet provide for the relocalion of four (4) exisling surface parking stalls located on the I Vail Road Property to a different location on the g Vail Road property [bold added in this letter for purposes of highlighting the issue] and has required certain unspecified parking rights whose current location on the Nicollet Property is uncertain;..." NINEVAILROAD 9 Vail Road ' Vail, CO 81657 SOOI 8?2-7221 97Ol 4?9'7r0o nncm:hi'F* Fri 1? i,i-i TOV-C0flt.DEV.D RSosoo3 ? This reiterates the variance granted for 4 parking spaces to be relocated on 9 Vail Road property, not 2 on 9 Vail Road property and 2 on Four Seasons property as stipulated by the PEC and overturned by Town Council. 5 * A Construction Easemenl and Temporary Construction Agreement, exhibit to the aforementioned Compromise and Release Agreemeni to which Town of Vail is a party, stipulates the location of the 4 relocated parking spaces to be adjacent to the driveway leading to the underground parking at 9 Vail Road Condominiums. 6 - The Construction Easement and Temporary Conslruction Agreement further specifies lhat the parking spaces'be relocated prior to demolition of the existing spaces or oflhe access drive leading lo those spaces. Since the access drive will be blocked off for demolition, these spaces will have to be built this spring. 7 - Ordinance No. 9, Series 2003 stipulates in Section 5, item 21: "That the developer is responsible for 10oo/o of final design improvements along West Meadow Drive from the cenlerline ofthe road back to lhe Four Seasons properly line from Mayors' park to western most property line of the Four Seasons [bold added to highlight the fact that the landscaping associaled with the relocated parking spaces is, by definition, part oflhe overall landscaping plan for the Four Seasons and should be reviewed as part ofthe overall landscaping plan, not as an isolated piecel, including any drainage and grade tie-ins beyond the west property line. This includes all improvements, including, drainage, lighting, art, streetscape enhancements, edge treatments, curbs, heated walks, etc. Final dans shall malch and be coordinat€d with the proposed Town of Vail Streetscape plan br West Meadofl Drive and shall be provided for revierv and approval by the Design Revierfl Bosrd.' It is the intent of Nicollel (now Vail Development LLC) to include the 'front selback" of 9 Vail Road Condominiums on West Meadow Drive in their total landscape plan. I regret lhat Staff has not seen fil to fill you in on the background of this application, and I find it most interesting that "Staff was concerned that the approvals given in 2003 by both the Planning and Environmenlal Commission and the Town Council were taking precedence over the concerns ofthe Design Review Board at that time." Staff was not at all reluctant to foster the concerns of the DRB to either the PEC or the Town Council in the variance hearings. This indicates that staff thinks the DRB should be able to overrule the PEC and the Town Council. I was nol aware that power was in their job description. .'r4+'z-c-*/ Gwen Scalpello President, Holiday House Condominium Association d/b/a I Vail Road Condominiums Cc: Mr. T.J. Brink, Vail Development LLC Mr. George Ruther, Chief of Planning, Community Development Mr. Russell Forrest, Director of Community Development VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETTNGMINUTES TUESDAY, JULY I, 2OO3 The regular rneeting of the vail rown council was called to order at 7:00 p.M., on Tucsday, July I, 2fi)3, in the Vail Tovm Council Charnbcrs. . MEMBERS PRESENT: LudwigKurz, Mayor STAF'F PRESENT: Rod Slifer, Mayor Pro-Tem Dick Cleveland Diana Donovan Bill Jewitt Creg Moffet Chuck Ogilby Pam Brandmeyer, Int€rim Town Manager Matt Mire, Town Attorney The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Torn Steinberg appeared before the Council to offer his r€luctant support for the ternporary use ofthe Ford Park softball fields ftx ski season parking. Steiuberg suggested thar a contract be signed between tlre towr and Vail Resorts in which the two parties would agrce to certair terms and conditions. He srrggested the use be temporery. pcrhaps a minimum of thrce years, and thar Vail Resorts be requirod to restore the fields to their natural state at the end oftlrc contrno period. Steinberg's apprehension, in part, is due to safe.ty concerns, he said. Steinberg suggcsted the need for a safe pedestrian route, such Lc across the Manor Vail bridge or the strcamwalk, rather than alongside the Frontage Road or Vail Valley Drive. While noting some I'undamenlal disagreements about the town's pa,rking role, which he said lies squarely with Vail Resorts, Joe Staufer also said he would find use ofthe lislds at Ford Park acceptable to people so long as the u$e is lirnited to t'ewer than five years, the cost is bonre by Vail Resorts and rhe fields are restored to their natural state orrce the use is comple.tc. Staulbr also suggested the need far a contractual ogreement to avoid misunderstandings in the firture. l'lo Steinberg expressed opposition to using the t'ields for ski season parking, criticizing Vail Resorts for its decision to coilinue to attract day skiers to the resort. Steinberg said thc company's actions will cause overcrowding situations and will negatively impact the destination skier rnarket. Kaye F'etry of the Vail Charnber and Business Association (VCBA) presotted the organization'* parking recomrnendstions in preparation ibr Town council consideration of the 2003-04 winter program. The vcBA recotnmend$ restbration of tlrc 90-minute free parking progtram ond the retum ofFreo After 3. [n addition, Ferry said the group endorses alternative parking options, such as usc ofthe Ford Park softball fields, to keep cars ofr the Frontage Road. Bill Hanlon exprrssed.$upport for returning to the Free Atter 3 parking program, ac well as other parking options, $uch as the Ford park proposal. lf parking is allawed on the Frontage Road next sea.ron, Hanlou suggested shortening the tirne allowed on the roadway, saying the l l p,m, allowance is too long. With the parking structures ernptying out after the litis close, Hanlon said vehicles ftom the F'rontage Road could be moved iuto the structures. which would also improve late-night pedestrian safety, On behalf of his farnily's busiless, John Gorsuch also expressed support for reinstating thc Free After 3 parking pt'ogratn, saying it contributcs to the town's vitality. Gbrsach also stressccl the importance of having ample customer parking. Paul Rondeau emphasized pcdesldnn saf€ty concems in suggesting the towd eliminate parking on the Frontage Road during ski season. He noted the town's liability, be it moral or legal, in the event of a tragic accident. The second itcm on the agcnda was the Consent Aganda re; June 3 and June 17 Evening Meeting Minutes. Greg Moft'et moved to table approval of the June 3 meetiog minutes and to approve the Juue 17 minutes. Dick Cleveland seconded the motion. The Council asked that revisions be made to the Junc 3 minutes to clarify its discussion on the fire services agenda topic. The third itsm on the agenda rvas a Tax liquity and Fiscal Re.sponsibility Hearing Act (TEFRA) Hearing. To rneet the technical requirements of tlre Intemal Revenue Servioe Code, the Council couducted a puhlic hearing to solicit comments on the town's rolc in the issuance of private activity bonds for thc Middle Creek Village housing developrnent, No testimony u'as ol'iered, The fourth itcrn on the agcnda (originally item #12 on the agenda) was the second reading of Ordinance #15, Scries of 2003, regarding Private Activity Bonds forMiddlc Creek, authorizing issuancc of a nraximum of $18.5 rnillion in bonds by the town for tlre Middle Creek Village housing development. Greg Moffet moved lo approve the ordinhnce as read. Bitl Jcwitt seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1. Diana Donovan opposcd. ln voting to approv€ the ordinance. Courrciknenrbers said the town's rolc was to $erve as a conduit !o obtain tax-exempt status' There is no debt or oblig'ation on behalf of the town. Bond proceerts will be loaned to Middle creek village , LLC., which will be solely responsible to pay ibr detrt service on the bonds as rvell as issuancc costs. In voting agairut the ordinanca, Councilmernber Diana Donovan said the Middle Creek project doesn't serve the tonrn's irtterests and would bc turned down if it went to a public vote. The n€xt itenr on the agenda was a discussion on th€ Nsvember Election, During tho discussion, Inaerim Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer had arked the council to sonsider adding an additional .61 mills to the ballot messurc for stdfrng and operation of the third fire station. noting that a lirnding source for thc anticipated $325,fiXJ in annual expenses is yet to be identified. At the suggesrion of Dick Cleveland, the Council majority said it prefened to exclude operational expenses frorn tlre ballot so as not to inhibit consolidation discussions with other emelgcncy selices providers. During the public cotnment period, Paul Rondeau said that while he was an opponent of a 4 rnill property tax increase which was placed on the bnllot by the Town Council last ycar, he would be a proponent this time. largely because ofwhat he dcscribed as a "bite-sized" proposal. Rondeau said a property tax for fue and first responder services in the new Millcnnium would serve a need to help rcstore the split in sales tax revenue allocations between town operatious and capinl costs. More specifically, he said a third frre station woukl meet an established need in that it woulcl: l) stratogically locate a fire station on the north side of I-70 and on the west end of town; 2) providc more uniform, fast response time for firc and t'irst responder seruices along the l0 mile long town: and 3) provide needed back-up when multiple emergency services ev€ut$ occur in town or on I-70. Rondeau said he would support adding operational expenses to the ballot measure so long as an annual audit coul<l be conducted tojrdge productivityand effectiveness. He also suggesfedthat a fire cornpany citizeus academy be fcrrmed to add a volunt€er cornponent to the department's operation$. Also speaking was Rick Scalpollo who suggested that a demo- rebuild of the Main Vail fire station rnay be more cost-effective than a remodeJ. Dick Cleveland moved to dirpct staffto prepare m ordinance for the November ballot that w<lrld contain a property tax of fewer than ,lll mills which would be used to construct and cquip a nerv fire statiou in West Vait and to rebuild the Main Vail fire station. Creg Moffet secorded the motion, A vote was taksn and the motion passed 5-2. Bill Jewitr and Diana Donovan opposed. In voting against the motion, Bill Jewitt said the town should tind a way to firnd core services, such as fire station improvements, out of existing revenues rather thar rcly on voter sentimetrt, wlrile Diana Donovan raised questions about the need for a third t'ire station. The mill levy would sunset after the bonds are retired. ln voting to lowqr tln .81 rnill lcvy rate, the Council majority asked that a new rate be established that would correspond to a modified construction budget of $3.2 rnillion for rhe nerv t'ire station. The .81 mill levy rate had been calculated based on a $4'2 rnillion fire statiorr budget, The next itern on the agendn was n Request to Honor F'allen Cyclist Brett Malin. The Council approved a r€quc$t by Adam Palnrer and other memben ofthe cycling community to erect a memorial plaque on the Dowd Junction rtcreational path bridge to horror Brett Malin. who was killed on June l8 when he was hit by a tractor trailer while comp€ting lbr Team vail during the Racc Across America cycling event. The plaquc will bc erected on or befbre July 13 to coincjde with a communitymemorial servici The group was asked to coordinate details with Interim Town Manager pam Brandmeyer. Tlrc next item on the agenda was the Ole I'lousc Awnirrg Appeal. Allison ochs, town planner, presented the appeal to the council, stating the applicant was appealing to overturn Desigrr Review l3oard denial ofa plastic shade on the dining deck at the Ore House and to direct stalTto explore a regulatory componeflt for future applications. Ochs stated the Orc l'Ioule shnde was inteuded to shield patr,ons during inclement weather. During his appenl to the Towr Council, applicant larry Anderson, rnanager of the Ore House, snid the shade/awning had been in place fbr 4 to 5 years and had.caused no harm to anyone. The device is never used in the winter, he said, and is used sparingly during the surnmcr. ln additjon, Anderson said his restnurant has no interest in enclosing the outdoor dining deck and is prohibited from doing so. Andeixon also raised an equity issue. notiug that a similar plastic awning is in use at Pepib. While noting the shade/arvning has been in use for several yeam, Mayor Ludwig Kurz also noted the businesses'tailure to receive town approval, which was acknowledCed by Anderson. During the public hearing, John Corsuch urged the Council to allow the plastic awning, noting its utilitarian f'unction arrd its widesprend use at otlrer resorts across the country. Also speaking in favor of the appeal was Kaye F'ery of the Vail Chanrber ald Business Association who said the plastic awnings, which are discouraged by the town's guidelines, would be less intrusive than tlre allowable canvas mat€rial. Ferry likcned fte arvning request to an umbrella and urged the Council to be a proactive partner in responding to business needs. Greg Moftbt rnade a motion to overturn the DRB decision subject o design guidelines. Bill Jervitt secrmdcd the motion. A vote wa.s taken and the motion passed 6- 1, I)onovan opposed. In voting to overtum clenial of the application, Clouncilmembers fiound that the plastic shade.s meet the intent of the desip guidelines. In votingagainlrt the motion, f)iana Donovan expressedconcenrs atroul an evenhral deok enclosure and the lack ofconditiorrs tied to the application. The next itern on the agcnda was an appeal ofthe June 9, 2003, Planning and Environmental Comnrission decision to approve with conditions a request for a variance for Nine Vail Road Parking and Loading. Thc Nine Vail Road parking issues surtbced during review of the redel'elopme nt application for tlre adjacent Four Seasons Resort property, which originally hu{ a joiut parking plan. Final approval of the Four Seasons redevclopment plan by the PECI ha{ been contingent on approval ofa plan for the four piuking $pace.s at Nine Vail Road. Greg MotTet made a motion to modifr a Planning and Environtnental Cornmission (PEC) decision which approved a variance to allow foi nvo parking and loading spaccs in the front;etback at Nine Vail Road wift nro other parking speces to be located within ths parkiug structure of the adjacent Four Seasons Resort. ln nrodifuing the PEC clecision, all tbtu parking spaces will be relocated to the Nine Vail Road parking garage erttry off Meadow Drive with a landscaping plan to be approved by the Desigrr Reviow Board. A vote wa.s takon and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. !'ollowing the vote, Councilmembcr Diana Donovan suggested prop€rties be gran<lt'athered when similar circurnstances occur rather than declare properties to be non-cottforming as was the case with Nine Vail Road. Jim Larnont of rhe Vail Village llomerrwner's Association offered similar comments, saying the town should &ccomrnodate pruperties to nulce tlrcm,whole again rather than declare thern to be non-confonning. The next item on the agenda was a 2004 Allocation Request for Commission on Special Events. Creg Moffet rnoved to approvc a $565,000 funding request from the Vail Comrnission on Special Evexts to bs included in the 20M budget. Bill Jewitt seconded the motion. A vote was taken on the rnotion and the rnotion passcd unanirnously, 7-0. Requcsts for a ()3-04 parking pess, oonfinued legal zupport and copying service.s also r"'*eived approval. Creg Moftbt made a motion to authoriz.e $50,000 in the next 2003 supplernentnl budget appropriation to help the Vail Valley Chamber and Tour.ism Bureau (VVCTB) establish an icon event for Vail as the exclusive resort sponsor ofthe Professional Cycling Tour, the nation's largest pro cycling serics, which draws crowds of 300,fi[ during its established stops in Philadelphia, New York and San l-rancisco. Bill Jervitt seconded the motion. t)uring an overuiew, Rick Chastain of thc WCTB said the annual Labor Day weekend event would have an inrnediate return on investrnent fbr Vail and would be financially self-supporting by 2006. While Chastain had asked for consideration of a $100,000 rcquest from the town, Councilman Greg Moffet $uggestd a cost-share between the town's budget and funding from the Vail Local Marketing District. A vote was taken and the moliorr passed 7-0, h voting to approve the $50,000 allocation from the town, Mayor Ludwig Kurz said the cycling eventwould be similar in marketing magnitude as that of the Ne.w York Philharmonic. The next item on the agenda was firct reacling of Ordinance #6, Series of 2003, An Ordinance to Allow TySre II Employee llousing Unit as a Permittod Use The Council voted 5-2 (Donovan and Jewitt against) to approve first reading of an ordinance to alkrrv a Typc Il employee housing unit as a permitted use and to eliminate a Type lI employee housing unit as a conditional use iu the tnwn's residential zone districts. Inpresenting the recommended changes, Bill Cibson, a planner in the Community Development Deportrnent, said the pruptxed text atnendrnents would improve elficiency of the developrnent rcview proces.s and had bcen recomtnanded for approval by the Planning and Environmental Cornmission. However, in voting against the motion, Councihnember Diana Donovan questioned the ration{le, saying sorne cmployee housing unit applications have been inappropriatc and. thercfore. shor.rld continue to be evalualed as a conilitional use. Shc also called tbr additional rclbrms by the town to entbrce occupancy requirements. ln voting to appnrve the ordinance, Dick Cleveland said he consirieted it to be an appropriate change with minimal dow4sides. During thc public comrnent period, Jim Lamont of the Vail Village Homeowncls Association asked the Council to defer final rcading of the orclinance until thc outcome of the CRFA {gross residential floo'r area) discussion has concludql. Dick clevcland moved to approve ordinanoe #6,slbject to findings in the starTmemo. Greg Moffet secondetl tie motion, A vote wastaken and the nroti'n passed 5-r, Bill Jewiit a*d Diana Dorrovan rppo*ro. The next item on the agenda was the first rearling of Ordinance No. 16, an ordinance toallow the separate sale or transfer of rype II Employec l{ousing unit. Greg Moffet recused hirnself fiom the discussion due to a contractual relationship with fre applicant. Councilmetnbers Bill Jewitt, Dick Cllevcland and kxl Slifer expressed concsrns about maintaining atlbrdability of the units as well as the impact when duplencs becorne triplexes as a result of the sale. Diana Donovan also eipres.sed opposition, guestioning the 1,500 sq. ft. nraxinrunr sizr, as well as othcr issues. 'In offering suppori rot tttu change. Councilman Chuck Ogilbypointed to the town's existingjode which allows for thesdle of Type III housing units on lrigh-dcnsity residential and-commercial property. To be consistent, ogilby said the town should also do the same for Type ll units in 0rl lower{ensity residential zone districts. The appricaut, Greg Amsden of AMS Development, had proposed thc change as an incentive to address the noed to create employee housing opportuuities for profeesionals in vait. Dick cleveland made a motion to deny the ordinance # l6 on first reading, Bill Jewitt seconded the motion. A vole was takcn and the motion passed 5- l-1. with Chuck ogilby voting in favor. chuck ogilby encouraged the council to contiuue to work on an acceptnble s6lstion. The next itern on the agenda was the frrst reading of ordinmce #14, an Ernergency Ordinance to Authorize Creation of Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation and the Making of a Loan to Acquire Property. Mafi Mire' town attoJney, and Nina Timm, housing authority administrator, presented the ordinance to the council, stating this emergetrcy ordinance was to authorizc creation of thc Timber Ridge Housing Corporation and the making of a $lmillion loan l'rorn theTown of Vait (proceeds from the Miller Rangh sale) to the Timber Ridge Affordable llousing corporation for acquisition of the Timber Ridge apanmenrs. An additional g2l million in debt wifl be issued by ihe corporation, The action was initiated in April when the Town C,ouncil votod 7-0 to pass a resqlution to scek a fricndly coudemnation of thc lgti-unit property. Acquisition by the town.enables the properly to be maintained as employee housing in perpetuity. Bill Jewitt motioncd to approve Ordinance #14 as an emergency ordinance. Greg Moffet seconded the rnotion. A vore was taken and the motion passcd unanirnously, 7-0. The next itern on the agenda was the Town Manager's ReJrort. In reviewing the Town Manager's Report, the Council nrodified a staffrequest for town use ofthe Donovan Pavilion, adding a May 2004 datc fbr the town',s ctean-up day, eliminating a request for use on New Year's Eve as well as requests by thc Police Department ftrt training; Also, duing its review of the Town Manogerh Report the Town Council votsd 7-0 to approve a requcst by Interim Town Managel Pam Brandmeyer to authorize a 2.5 perccnt nrcrit increase for town ernployees. While the increaser, represcnting $250,000, had been carried in thc 2003 budget, Brandmeyer had askod for Clouncil approval prior to implcment*tion, In rcsponse to a third item on the Tovm Manager's Reporr, rhe Town cormcil votod ?-0 to endorse implemurration of a resowo Jrotice ol*cer program. A question regarding a F.ry. otlicerh autlnrity to cany e wsapon wa.s rei"trid to potice ctrief dwight- Henninger. As there was no further brrsines, Rod slifer rnotioned to adjoum. Bill Jewiu e€conded the motion. A vote was rakcn and the motion was passed unanimously, 7-0, and the meetirrg was adjourned at 9:30 p.M. Respectfu lly submittod, Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson. Town Clerk Mar. 9.2005 12rl9Pli{ ZEI{RXN AND ASS0CIA l{0. 5388 P, I/1 From: 1652 772 E H R E N ^NoAssochrEs,rNc. - Atf,Ht|tcruff . I'lJ\r{NrNg , Nln r(J*t . lAr'{nEC rF^RCHlrtCTURt FA)( Drte; Much 9,2005 TotalPeger: 7 fo: Efllabeth Eckd Phone: 479-2138 Town ofVrll Fexr 47Y2452 Frorn: Timlosa Pbone: 97|0.9494257 Zehrcu and Asrociater, Inc. Frxl 97lF9rl9-10t0 ProJectr Nlnc Veil Roed Project No,: 20051652.00 Co,pies Tor frlc Re; Ihelrformer Requiremonts Bncloscd is the requested Transtbrmer infumation, Architecturc . Phnnlng. Iutcrlors r Landecape Archltocture P'O. Bor 1976 Avon, Colondo tt620 Notify the sedor iarmcdlncly ot'any cro$ or imccuracice iu the above or artqchtd inforaution . TOV050309transfonmrTl.doc ltar,.9. 2005 12:19P}rI Z0I|REN AND ASS0CIA N0,5388 P, 2/7 From:1652 Section 4. l. 4. (continued) b. lf ascess to the room does not Permit the use of Holy Cross Energry equlpmcnt for lrmoval, relocation, and installarion of facllities, it shall be thc respontibility of the conglrmer to provide the means to remove, rclocate, and Install Holy Cross Energy's facilities. Transformers can weigh 20,000 pounds and require large'boom" rrucks and trailen for trirnsportation. c, Arthe expense ofthe consumer, the room shall be suirably illuminared and a convenlence outlet pro\rided, d. Consume/s equipment, fuses, etc. shall not be installcd in thc room. e. The consumer rhell provide a Holy cross Energy approved' separate ventihtion system tothE outside air. lt mu$ har,€ a manurl /auto conrrol to close on temPeraure rlse. Under no clrcumsrances will the room vutllation ducts be ticd into thc building \rtntildion syttem- f. Transformcr rooms shrll be plovided with a retrining or holding tank system to collect any oil spillage. Any water entering'the room mutt be dralncd awey frgm the room Sepante ftom any oil. Provisions mu3t be made !o pump any oil collected in tfie sump from lhe room. s. Provide permane means to install or remove rranslormer (hoilvttolley cftne, elc.). h. Providc l' cgnainuous condut from junction box mounted beslde elecrric meter to main tclephone board for telcphonc lmerface rvllh €lectrlc meter. i, Thl$ room shall be designered for the transformcr only and will nq[ cont.in .ny other eguipmcnl or sloEge. j. Holy Cross Eneqy will nor eherglze any transformer room in a building for_temporary or- perinanent scrviEe until rU roon specificrrions rrc mct. A flnrl chedrlFr ofroom ipecificrdons Ir approved by the assignld Holy Crsss Energy enginecr, and the room has been turned owr to Holy Crofs Energy for occupency. k. Dedicatcd 3eparate firt alarm 2one circuit lor the transfo.mer rcom to buildinE fire alarm panel. l. Becrure of the vtrlcry of special problemr arising during the construcdon of a tansformer room in a building, only the mort general specilicatlons coverlng thelr deslgn and ar?angemens arJpresinted herran. Holy Cross Energy mu3t, therefore, be con ulted u/ell in advance of any proposed projcct J. TMNSFORT{ER/EQUIPMENT INSTALI.ATIOI{' PAD MOUNTED Holy Crosg Energy will provide an outdoor pad.mounted transformer for s€rvice to consumert, such a5; sho'pping centeri, office buildings, schools, large apenment buildings, etc., under ths following condidons: l. Holy Cross Encrgy witl orr/n, operare and mainrain the primary underground installa{on beMeen the adjicent disrribriiion faclllrles and the ransformer. including primary cable, ducts. transformers and prorectve equipment. Z. Holy Cross Encrgy will conncct all conductors and maintain the low volage connection at the transform€R sccondary terminals. 3. propeny shatl be to final grade (plus or minur 6 inches) exc€pt at equipment location, which.shall Ue io exacr linal grade, Pioperty comer pins are to be in place with the sttuctur! staked or the foundatlon in, prior to instrllrtlon of the pad-mounted equlpment and gplice vaults. 4.6 l{ar,. 9, 2005 l2:19P}rt ZEIIREI.I AND ASSOCIA Section 4. J. (continued) 4. Holy Cross Energy ghould be consulted well In advance of any proposed project for apprwal of location and transformer capacity. 5. In rhe €vent, and In theJudgment of Holy Cross Energy's engineer that the consume/s selected location for the installation of the pad'mounted equipment is not adequetely protected from traffic when direcred by publlc authorlty, consumer shall provldc rnd install ether e fence, guardrail, or guard posu to protect the pad-mounted cquipment. The installation shall, so far as practlcal, confotm to the drawing3 in Section 8. 6. Holy Cross Energy will not petmh current $qnsformers In Holy Cross Energy ovvned I g transformers, 7. Vehicle access ro transformer must be provlded. Funher dereils retaring specifically to transformeG will be found in the separate transformcrs section ot rhis guidebook, Section 5. Drawings showing typical transformer installatlonr and cleaEnces are cgnnloed h Segllon 8. K POINT OF DEUVERY h ls the pollcy of Holy Cross Energy ro own, op€rils, and meintain the electlic disffbution facllirles up to the point of deliwry. This policyis applicable to service rendered from either orerhead or undcrground facitities. All such facilities will be installed in accordance wlth Holy Cto3t Erurgy3 ExRn3ion Pollcy and Rules and Regulations on tile at iti main office in Glenwood Springs. In general, the point of dellvery will be conslderrd tg be at rha point of anrghmcnt and conncstion to the service'rltast rnd servlce entrance conductors for consumers service supplied by an orerhead service drop. The polnt of dcllvery for a consumer served by an underground service lateral ls the pad mountcd transformel consumer installed reryice lnstallarions shall be 500 kcmil conducor, (600 kcmil compressed), or smrll€r, for termination to Holy Cross Energy faciliiies. The number of conductors rhat may be terminated is llmhed by rhe rypc of lnsrallatlon as follows; l. Overhead secondary risers are limitcd ro three (3) condults pcr bracket (3 conduib racked together on one pole srand off bracke: - see drawing in Section $. Each conduit shall contain . conplete set of clrcult conducgrs. 2. A maximum of two secondary (6 conduits max) risers can be atached to the Holy cross Energy pole provided rhey meer all Holy Cross Energy required speclficrtlons. Ser climbing space. clearances and other requlrcmcn$ In Sectlon 8. t. Underground service larerals from a rhree phase pad-mountcd trrnsformer ar. llmlt d to flftccn (l 5) conduitors per phase (50O kqmil - 6Oo kcrnil compressed). tf a transformer lcrves multlple lots, thcn servlce latcrals are llmhed by thc ratio of conductors pcr lot; i.e. S lots wsuld allow each lot to have a maxlmum of 3 conduc:ors per phase. 4. Underground :ervige larerals frgp 5lnglo-phrse pad-mounted transformers are limhed to 5 conductors pcr phase - 500 kcmil maximum size (600 kcmil compresscd). Conditions olher than above should be discussed with Holy Cross Energy's edglnecring dcpertrnent Fot requiremen$ greater than th€ limilations above, special arangements must be made wlth Holy Crots Energy for the inslallation of bus ducr, larger conductor, or other high Capaclry slrulcl rnlrlncQ wiring meihods. This arrangement may be made by contacting the Holy Cror! Energy engineering department. The cngineer assigned wlll assist in the design of these high capaciry entrances. No,5388 P. 3/1 Fron: 1052 4.7 lfa r,- 9. 2005 l2: l9P1i{ZEHREN AND ASSOCIA SECTTON 5 Transformers A GENERAL Holy C/oss Encrgy shrlf not bc rcquircd to furnish primary transformerr unlesr thcy arc of standard size, volt|ge and impedance as established by Holy Cross Energy for the locality where the service 15 renddcd. Holy Cross Energy must be notified in advance of any change in the consume/s load requirements lhal may rflect rhe installEd tnnsforner current or voltage rating, Umitatlons on the number and slze of secondary conductors are discussed under the headlng of'Point of Deliverf in Section {. Capeciwa. lf the consume/s power requirements wlthln slx months afer the Installation of lran:formrs pKrves to b€ 6ignificantly grearer or less :han shown in the appllcation for tctuice, Holy Crbis Energy mry make a change in ihe installed rransformer caprcitY.nd the consumer may be required to pay l'loly Cross Energy the cort of mrklng the chrnge. b. An incre$e in the trgnsformer caprclry wlll increase the available faulr current rnd mighr affect rhr int€rrupthg capability of rhe maln disconnect. Refer ro the 'Fault Currenf heading in Section z for more information on fauh curent PAD IIOUNT Clearancq A minimum often feet clearance, for hot stick operation, shalt be malnrrlnecl in front of tlre doors of thc pad mountcd transformer. Transformers will not be located under,any ocrhrng (rsol brlcony, stalrs, etc.). Rear and side clearances wlll bc crtrblEhcd by the appropriate Holy Cross Energy engineer in rccordance wlth Holy Cross Energy constnrction standard3. P.d mounRd transformen requlrc alr clrculrtlon for cooling, Clearance end screening requiremgnrt ate shown in Appendix I andJ. Clearances rcquircd in specific cases mly be obtained from Holy Cross Energy's englneerlng depanment. tnsralletlon Ceneral requirements concerning in$allarlon rnd operation of transformers is discussed under dte heading of 'Transformer/Equipment inrtallation. Ped Mounted" in Section 4. Transfotmers in bulldings is discussed under the headlng of Transformer Installations (lnterlgr Rooms!' in Section 4. Veults Precast concrete veulB ale located bcncath cach pad mountcd Fansformer. Thc vauh prwldcs sprrn to allon extrr lengrh of primary (l 4,/O0 volo cable to be coiled in csse tenninatorr need to be replaced. thc nuli rlso contains th! ground rod and grounding conducor for the primary distribution sptem. All services fed from rhls uensfiormer will alro occupy rpace in the vault. Rcfcr to 'Underground Service' in Section 4 for additional Information. No.5388 P, L/I From:i052 l. t. t. 3. il. s.l It{a r.- 9. 2005 l2:2OPlt ZEHREN AND ASSOCIA N0,5388 P. 5/7 From:1652 Appendix H HOLY CROSS ENERGY ENGINEERINC DEPARTMENT 3799 Highu/ay E2 - P. o. Eox 2150 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 (970) 945-5491 EOUIPMEI{T SCREENING SPECIFICATTONS All proposed derigns or proposed alterations to cxlstlng rcreens shall comply with the folloting specifications'. eroiosils (plans alnd spetniatlons) shall be submined io the Holy Cross Eneigy Engineering Deplnm-eot for wrlnen apjrwal piior to consiruction. Compliance and approval shall be the sole determinarion of thr Holy.Cross.Energy. firbineert'ng Deprnm€nt, Noncompliance with thisi spccifications or failure tg gein writttn approval, shall result in the dcnial of r plrmanent meter connection or the dismantling of nonconforming screen9. Appendix I and J are examples of suggested equipmcnt screcnl. Gcneral Specific.tions: I . Holy Cross Encrgy shall not be liable for any damage to screens. Z. Soien construciion and maintenance shall be the rcsponsibllity of panies other than Holy Ctogs EnstgY. 3. The area inside rhe screen shall be kept clern, There shell be no materid of arry klnd rrorcd insidc th-c scGen. 4, Holy Cross Energy equipment will be i'nstelled in lccordlnce wilh Holy Cross Energy installetion speclflcations. Design Speclflcatlons: l, All equipment shall be readily accessible by Holy Cross Ene.gy personnel, Z, All consiruaion shall be permanent In naturc, ahd shalt not inGrfere with operalion and mrlntonlncr of Holy Cross Energy facilities.3. Thera shdibe a maxlmum of | 0 feet hotizortal dlstlncc from equipment to nealest vehiclc acce3s way to permit removal or replacement of equlpment. 4. . thsrs shatl br a minimum of t O fcei lerrcl, unobstructed, hoiizontal dlstance in fronl of equipment doors for maintcnancc and opera ons actlvities.5. waier, snow and ici buildup shall be prerrented. Ploper dreinrge shall be providcd. The area lnslde the encloiure shall be gravel oi concrere.' Snor removrl'by panies-other than Holy Cross Encrrgy may be teguired. Equlpment wlll notle located under rooflines where water, snow or. ice buil<lup and dnina-gc qlay oclur, 6. Eduibmcnt shall not be covered In any manner for I 5 feet directly abow the rquipment. i-f In the.opinion of ttiVCross €nergy, the size and/or wiight of equipmeng to be insalled may present handllrc problems, rdditional access and clearance may be required.7. T}crc shrll be no doors or moving pens atsocleted wirh the scr.en, 'E. ltllls shall be l maxlmum qf 6 fe€t in Hght. 9. Thrre rhall bc no wells within l0;ect of cqulpme.lt sldes heving doorc. 10. Equipment doors shall be able lo open fully, I L Prbpir equipment venrilation (mlnlmum + irrr frcm eguipment pad) shall be maintained. Thls mry require snow remoral by parties other th.n Holy Cross Energy. I Z. ihruLt inU t..u! iin all stages ot gmwth;, ornamcntii decoration, landscaping or any oiher camouflage shall conform to all specificatlons.13. Con:act Holy Cross Energy for equlpment and pad dimcnsions. ' Door' rtc dircoeAgcd. ltorvtt,ct, in ,oma c|r€t, such :i locrlloni naat schools. doots may b! lPProvad for aquiPmeDl rcftaallng. Door ruDsofir rh.[ bc ccncrctc bloch cr cenctcrc, Doot6 6hrll ba ol srurdy ron*ructton rnd opln onto rn rtel Ehr! 15 k€pr lirr of !norv.ud.ica. iuifi i plih"E tir, iiG-r6ii, jc oooir ittitL trrin removrblc hrnjes and b. locktd wiih r.Holv c'osr Entngv le€k' lt rtcblcrnr dcvclop t^'lth door o!.irtion, thr doo1r sill be dismrntlcd. }lar" 9,2005 l2:20Plr{ZEIIREN AND ASSOCIA N0,5388 P, 6/7 From:1652 PLAN VIEW F'RONI VIFW .Nuitl (he ltr' rtot'mvrtr drgtonce 10 vthrclc gccggSwoy requramQhr mcy Dc ochttvod lfom eqviprne,ll S'ilCi Othor thoo lhc onc rhovn nb(ivo APPENDIX I TRANSFORMER SCREEN (Not to Scale) OATE:r, 2001 RE/6Eo APRIL l. Z00Z $ "o.t cRoss ENERGY lla r., 9, 2005 l2: 20Plt ZEHREN AND ASSOCIA N0,5388 P. 1/7 Frotn:1652 l--.r0' Mt'I$Ur,^srotttlwrt0llullurl.t!r..lit FRONT VIEW tbE l0' nlrnDd di elrE lo rilalt aalrlatAy 4lQsna.nlFl aot b! tx r.!vl!C l.!tn radthtnl ?tl.t !h.J lhon ll|! ur|. tlftrn ob-!. TRANSFORMER SCREEN r4l$rulr val HLtCUt rs 6l 1.2 (Not to Scale) i$ not" c^oss ENERGY I0m{0Fltut Depaltment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www.vailgov.com April 11, 2005 Mr. Tim Losa Zehren and Associates, Inc. PO Box 1976 Avon, CO 81620 (fax) 970.949.1080 Re: 9 Vail Road additional parking spaces DRB05-0037 Lot 9, Vail Village 2no Filing Dear Tirn, Thank you for the application lor additional parking spaces at the 9 Vail Road Condominiums. I took some time lo return lo you the approval lorm from the March 16'n Design Review Board meeting hoping that some of the Public Works issues which I had addressed with you prior to the approval would be handled and subniitted to our Department. At this point, however, I have simply added to the approval the conditions that the Design Review Board specified at their meeting several weeks ago: 1. The applicant shall ensure that the wall is constructed with a linish to match the existing river rock wall and associated cap located at the east side of the 9 Vail Road Condominiums. 2. Prior to rcquesting a final inspection of the project from the Community Development Department, the applicant shall ensure that all utility boxes and transformers located to the nofth of the proposed wall arc painted gray. Additionally, I would like. to lorewarn you thaf the following items are still needed before any construction to add parking spaces may begin: 1. A grading plan must be approved by the Public Works Department which indicates limits of distutbance fencing, existing and proposed grades of driveways, and proper erosion control. 2. Written approval from affected utility companies should be submitted to Community Development Department Staff before commencing with construction. 3. A public way permit must be obtained from the Public Works Department prior to commencing with'construction. I assume that these items will not be hard to generate and are, most likely already on hand. My intent in overlooking Staff's receipt of these items was twofold: to expedite the review process for you and Ms. Scalpello, and to keep atlention locused on the most important aspecls of the proposal, which the Design Review Board deemed to be the landscaping and the wall placement and style. {g u.""""o rtr"^ .. ,. t> Thank you for your patience throughout what is not always a simple design review process. As always, please :**Hro conlact ^.frn anY remaining questions or concerns.*ffiowfuo( ,41/ Elisabeth Eckel 970.479.2454 cc: CrwenScalpello, HolidayHouseCondominiums:970.479.7330 enclosul€ lt-(" THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Vail Town Code on June 9, 2003, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at g Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a seasonal use to accommodate an educational, recreational, and cultural use, located at 530 S. Frontage Road/Ford Park, Unplatted. Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, Inc. Allison Ochs Town of Vail/AlPP, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Allison Ochs A request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Condiiional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a private outdoor recreational facility, located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1"t Filing. Applicant: Vail ResortsPlanner: Bill Gibson A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to amend the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Town of Vail, represented by Greg HallPlanner: Waren Campbell The applications and information about these proposals are available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department office, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation held in the Town of Vail Community Development Department office and the site visits that precede the public hearing. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for additional information. This notice published in the Vail Daily on May 23, 2003. '#ffi= .-! TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Town Council Community Development Department July 1, 2003 An appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision to approve with conditions a request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, lo allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Appellent: NineVailRoadCondominiumAssociationPlanner: Allison Ochs il. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is Public Accommodation zoned lot, located at I Vail Road / Lot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. STANDING OF THE APPELLENT The appellant, Nine Vail Road Condominium Association, has standing to file the appeal as owners of the subject property. REQUIRED ACTION The Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval with conditions of the request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, io allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, VailVillage 2nd Filing. Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Gouncil is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based direaly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12) have or have not been meL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, Inc., submitted an application for a variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for four surface parking in lhe front setback. Section 12-74-11 states: Off street parking and loading shatl be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this tv. i v. title. At least seventy five percent (75"/") of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. No at grade or above grade surtace parking or loading area shall be located in any required front setback area. Below grade underground structured parking and short term guest loading and drop off shall be permifted in the required front setback subject to the approval of the planning and environmentalammission and/orthe design review board. BACKGROUND The Planning and Environmental Commission voted to approve (4-2, Schofield and Bernhardt opposed) the request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, with the condition that only two parking spaces and the minimum area required for a turn-around be located in the front setback, while the remaining two spaces be located within the parking structure of the proposed Four Seasons Resort. The staff recommendation was for denial of the variance request. Staff's recommendation of denial was based on the belief that there were alternative designs which would be less impactfulto the neighborhood and to the Wesl Meadow Drive pedestrian experience. Staff believed that a variance was warranted, but not to the degree al which it was requested. A copy of the June 9, 2003, memorandum has been attached for reference (Attachment A). Nine Vail Road Condominium Association has filed an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's June 9,2003, decision, which has been attached for reference (Attachment B). Minutes of the June 9, 2003, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting have been attached for reference (Attachment C). CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The staff memorandum of June 9, 2003, outlines the criteria and findings for evaluating a variance request of this nature. The Town Council must review an appeal based on the same criteria and findings that the Planning and Environmental Commission uses to evaluate a variance proposal. A. Consideration of Factors Reqardinq the Setback Variances: 1 . The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformily of treatment among sites in lhe vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and tralfic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the lollowinq findinqs vt. before orantino a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsislenl with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious lo properlies or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranled for one or more ol the following reasons: a. The stricl literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceplions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do nol apply generally to olher properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properlies in the same district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends lhat the Town Council upholds the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval with conditions of the request for a variance from Section 12-7 A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front selback, located at Nine Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Should the Town Council choose to uphold lhe decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission, slatf recommends the following findings: 1 . That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this Tille have been mel in the Planning and Environmental Commission action on this variance request. 2. That the granting of the variance will not conslitule a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on olher properties classified in the same district. 3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental 10 the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interprelation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical a x. hardship inconsistent with the objeclives of this title. b. There are exceplions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in lhe same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. In addition to lhe findings above, staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the condilions of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Specifically, staff recommends the following conditions: 1. That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant musl return to the Design Review Board for final review and approval oI all improvements. 2. That the applicant shall revise the plans, subject to Design Review Board review and approval, to indicate 2 surface parking spaces and the minimum area required for a functional turnaround within the iront selback, adjacent to West Meadow Drive. The remaining 2 spaces shall be provided in the structure of the Four Seasons Resort. ATTACHMENTS A. Planning and Environmental Commission Memorandum of June 9, 2003B. Appeals Form, received June 11, 2003C. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes of June 9, 2003 Planning and Environmental Commission ACTION FORM Deparfnent of Community Developrnent 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L9 fax: 97 0.479.2452 \ /eb: www.ci,vail.co.us Project Name: parking and loading variance PEC l{umben PEC030026 Project Description: Common Element - Variance to relocate four parking spaces in front setback Participants: OWNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 05/1212003 Phone: 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES CA 9003s License: APPUCANT Nine Vail Road Condo Assoc &05/1212003 Phone: 479-L788 POB 160 Vail, CO Gscalpello@attflobal.net 81558 License: Prctect Addrcss: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Location: Nine Vail Road Legal Description: Lot: 9-B Block SuMivision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 210107106001 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Doug Cahill Action: APPROVED Seond By: George Lamb Vote: 4-2 DateofApproval: 06/09/2003 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s), Cond: CON0006902 That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant must retum to the Design Review Board for final revieur and approval of all improvements. Cond: CON0005903 That the applicant shall revise the plans, subject to Design Review Board review and approval, to indicate 2 surface parking spaces and the minimum area requild for a functional turnaround within the front setback, adjacent to West Meadow Drive, Planner: Ailison Ochs PEC Fee Paid: $500.00 .DATE: SUBJECT: .MEMORANDUM ., Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department June 9, 2003 A request for a variance from Section 12-7 A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lol C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Development, Inc. Allison Ochs 'l;r, , SUMMARY / The applicants, Nine Vail Road Condominium Association arlft!icotet lsland Development, Inc., have requested avariance from Section 12-7A-11 , Pdrking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Staff is recommending denial of the request, subject to the criteria and finding, outlined in Sections Vlll and lX of this memorandum. DESCRIPTION OF REOUEST 'Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, Inc., have requested this variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking in the front setback. The applicants' statement of request has.been attached lor reference (Attachment A). Section 12-7A-11 states: Off street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with chapter 1 0 of this title. At least seventy five percent (75%) of the'iequired parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. No at grade or above grade surtace parking ot loading area shall be located in any required ^ front setback area. Below grade underground structured parking and short term ,,*[ 7ti'!li#,,!f;if:;i:,"ft'::!:,1f,'#'::iih*:;;i:J::::;;i?;:x::,';:"3ri:fl , ,li,r,, .';'"'::1, $1'' board' / ,., I il - g ,lthe application is in response to the proposed Four Seasons Resort development. The [,]#'t ![, ',ficurrent access to lour surface parking spaces is located on the Four Seasons Resort /'\1" ,J,.d,u- *A v property. As part of the development application, the current access is proposed to be\'/ ," lf i .,.r,.fi' 'i) removed and the palking lor Nine Vail Road relocated to West Meadow Drive. A vicinity Altt i .fft.lr-or', map is attached'for reierence (Attachment B). As Nine Vail Road is currenly non- '/t .rllrf #t' conforming with regards to the number of required parking spaces, these parking spaces W'"rnltu{l' U cannot be eliminated. Chapter 12-1 0, Off-street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code Jt .tV' would require 38 parking spaces. However, there are currently 31 spaces provided for Nine il. Applicant: Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland ilr. tv. Vail Road. Three of the proposed parking spaces would be located in the required 20 ft. front setback. l Section 12-2-2, Delinilions, Vail Town Code, provides the following definition for a "front lol or site line": The boundary line ol a lot or site adjoining a street which provides the primary access or street address of the site, or adjoining the primary access from a streetto the lot or site. As a resull, Nine Vail Road, according to the Zoning Regulations, has lwo front property lines: adjacent to Vail Road and adjacenl to West Meadow Drive. As a result, lhere are lwo front setbacks for Nine Vail Road. Therefore, a variance is required lo locate any surface parking in the area proposed. Reductions of the plans have been attached for reference (Attachment C). BACKGHOUND Information regarding the original construction of Nine Vail Road is limited. According to the legal file with the Town of Vail Community Development Department, construction of Nine Vail Road, originally called the Holiday House, occurred in the early 1970s. Since that time, development activities on the site have been limited to minor exterior alterations. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Planninq and Environmental Commission: The PEC is resoonsible for evaluatinq a proposal for: Action: The PEC is responsible for final approval/denial of a variance. The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: 'l . The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which reliel from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Tltle without granl of special privilege. 3. The effecl of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Desiqn Review Board: Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a variance, but must review any acco mp anyi n g D R B applicati on. t, V. Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by lhe Town Cguncil. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or ovenurn the board's decision. UIATT: tfreGtatt is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements ol the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as lo compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a stalf memo containing background on the property and provides a stall evaluation of the project with respect to lhe required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or deniai. Staff also facilitates lhe review process. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Zoning Regulations 12-7 A-1'l: PARKING AND LOADING: Off street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of thistitle. At Ieast seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. No at grade or above grade'surface parking or loading area shall be located in any required front setback area. Below grade underground structured parking and short term guest loading and drop off shall be permitted in the required front setback subject to the approval of the planning and environmental commission and/or the design review board. Section 12-1 7 Variances (in part) 12-17-1:PURPOSE: A. Feasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size; shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon;from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. 12-17-5: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION: Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a variance application, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submitted or may approve the application subject to such modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the application. A variance may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission may prescribe.7,1 ,-l 12-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT: Approval of the variance shal! lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two (2) years from when the approval becomes final. Streetscape Master Plan PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS The preliminary concepts for West Meadow Drive Focused on defining the existing pedestrian circulation patterns. This need to define the pedestian circulation system led to the development of the following preliminary concepts. . Use different paving treatments to create in-street pedestrian paths at the roadway level. This concept builds on the idea that part of the charm and fun of Vail is the ability to walk in the street. A streetJevel walk system is easier to maintain, but it was felt that the high volume of cars, buses and trucks using West Meadow Drive would create street-level pedestrian paths that would appear to create an even wider road without providing pedestrian safety. . To construct sidewalks of equal width on both sides of the street. Since this is the pattern that most people are familiar with, itwould be user friendly, but would result in relatively narrow walkways and increased pedestrians walking behind parked cars. ln addition, itwas felt that this system would do little to break up the monotony of the street. It was obvious from the first design study that all of the proposed options for the streetscape improvement would need to leave the existing vehicular circulation patterns intact. This was due to the number of private homes on the street and the need to maintain adequate access for Tawn buses and emergency vehicles. PR EFE RRED STHE ETSCAPE PLAN The concept that received the broadest public support was to create a primary pedestrian path (10' - 12' wide) on one side of the street and a smaller sidewalk (5' wide) on the other. The primary pedestrian path crosses from the north to the south side and then back again, to avoid the head-in parking. Curb and gutter would be used to define the street which has been narrowed to the minimum width of 26', curb-to-curb. Design Concept: Early on, it was recognized that, in Vail, people enjoy walking in the street. Because of safety concerns along West Meadow Drive, it became essential to create a separation between the pedestrians and vehicular traffic. The concept is to, in essence, create a new pedestrian street that is designed in such a way that it will be a more exciting pedestrian space than the existing asphalt street. The design calls fro intense planting along the',pedestrian street" to bring back the landscape character which still exists immediately adiacent to Gore Creek. This approach will also carry the landscape design I theme from West Meadow Drive through to East Lionshead Circle to strengthen the aonnection between Lionshead and the Village. A second design concept is to add to the pedestrian experience by creating an "artwalk" along this corridor. This idea will also compliment the existing artwork located on east Lionshead Circle. The intent is to involve artists and the neighborhood residents in the fina! design of the "artwalk"to allowfor site specific art pieces. The pedestrian street character is illustrated in Figure 7. The final plan, illustrated in figure 6, includes a number of unique features: . All pedestrian paths be constructed with concrete unit pavers to clearly distinguish them from the roadway. The primary pedestrian path may be a different color and/or style of unit paver than the minor walkway. . Having a walkway width of 1 0' to 12' was thought ta be important to allow groups of people to walk comfortably on the path (Figure 8). Thewidth of the primary pedestrian path also makes it possible for the path to be plowed by a small truck or tractor. lf this separated pedestrian system is lo be successful in keeping pedestrians out of the roadway, it must be kept clear of snow throughout the winter. . A "pedestrian priority crosswalk" has been planned near the Holiday lnn where the path crosses to the south to avoid head-in parking at the Skaal House and the Alphorn. This raised crosswalk keeps the pedestrian path at the same level as it crosses the street. The traffic is carried over the walkway by gently sloping ramps. Not only does this type of crosswalk give the pedestrian priority; it provides visual interest while slowing traffic. Design consideration should be given to maintenance and snow-plowing needs. Seating is provided at regular intervals and at bus stops. Opportunities for public art should also be considered at these points. The seating must be designed with careful attention to location, views, landscaping, etc., to insure the seating will be used. A neighborhood entry feature has been designed at the beginning of West Meadow Drive, near the fire station, to act as a psychological deterrent to unnecessary vehicular traffic. The fire station apron provides an opportunity for these cars to turn around. While this treatment will only discourage the lost visitor from continuing west on Meadow Drive, it was felt to be a reasonable compromise between a card-activated gate or manned control gate. The Plan calls for extensive right-of-way landscaping to soften the corridor and reflect the landscape character of nearby Gore Creek. The landscaping should be used to add as much visual interest and natural character to the sidewalk and seating areas as possible. Dense plantings are proposed to create a sense of enclosure for this pedestrian corridor. Some landscaping on private property will be necessary to q I achieve this effect. Additionally, planters have been proposed east of the fire station to help define the roadway and reduce the amount of asphalt. ) VI. ZONING ANALYSIS Zoning: Public Accommodation Land Use Plan Designation: Transition Area Current Land Use: Residential Development Standard Allowed/Reouired Existinq Proposed Lot Area: 10,000 sq. ft. 28,346 sq. ft. no change Setbacks: Front (Vail Road): 20 ft. 17 ft. no change Front (W. Meadow): 20 ft. '12 ft. no changeSides: 20 ft" zft. no changeRear: 20 ft. 12ft. no change Density: 16 du 27 du" no change.This property is nonconforming with regards to use as there are no au's. Landscape Area: 8,504 sq. ft. (30%) 1 1,368 sq. ft. (a0%) 1 1,160 sq. ft. (39%) Hardscape Area: 1 ,701 sq. ft. (20%) 1 ,700 sq. ft. (15%) 1,428sq.ft (13Y.) Parking: 38 spaces 3.1 spaces no change VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use ZoninqNorth: Mixed Use SDD #36 w/ Public AccommodationSouth: Mixed Use Public Accommodation Fire Station General UseEast: Mixed Use SDD #6 w/ Public AccommodationWesl: Mixed Use SDD #36 w/ Public Accommodation VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideration of Factors Reqardinq the Setback Variances: 1. The relationship of the requested variance io other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff believes that adding parking in the front setback will negatively impact the West Meadow Drive streetscape by allowing parking lo be within 1 ft. of the front property line and 21 ft. of the edge of pavemenl. The proposed streetscape plan for West Meadow Drive encourages significant landscaping in the right-of-way and on private property, where necessary. As proposed, staff does not believe there to be adequate area for landscaping. While staff supports the idea of additional site walls to screen the surface parking area, the proposed walls also limit the opporlunity for significant landscaping (i.e. 2. large spruce trees.) The Design Review Board conceplually reviewed the associated Design Review applicalion at their May 21 ,2003, and June 4, 2003, hearings. The Design Review Board felt that other options should be explored in the design of the parking area. Specifically, they felt that locating additional parking along West Meadow Drive would negatively impact the pedestrian experience. The Design Review Board expressed great concern that there would not be adequate landscape buffering area lo screen the proposed surface parking. Title 14, VailTown Code, states (in part); Particular attention shall be given the landscape design of offsteet parking lots to reduce adverse impacts upon living areas within the proposed development, upon adjacent properties, and upon public spaces with regard to noise, lights, and visual impact. At the J une 4, 2003, Design Review Board hearing, the applicants presenled a design which included 6 ft. site walls. The Title 14, Vial Town Code, states, in oart: Fences, hedges, walls, and landscaping screens shall not exceed 3 ft. in height within any required front setback area, and shall not exceed 6 ft. in height in any other poftion of the site, provided that higher fences, hedges, walls, or landscaping screens may be authorized by the Administrator when necessary to screen public utility equipment. A variance would be required for any wall in excess of 3 ft. in the setback. Staff believes that there are other opportunities lor the applicants which will not negatively impact the pedestrian experience along West Meadow Drive. Staff believes that there may be alternative designs which, while still requiring a variance, would minimize the impacts to West Meadow Drive. The degree to which relief f rom the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement ol a specilied regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. Many of the properties along West Meadow Drive currently have parking in the Jront setback and in the right-of-way, including lhe Alphorn, and the Skaal Haus. Both of these properties are residential uses, and are zoned High Density Multiple Family zone district. In addition, the First Bank of Vail, which is zoned Public Accommodation, also has parking located within the lront setback. Finally, the Vail Fire Slation, zoned General Use, also has parking located within the front setback and lhe right-of-way. All of these properties are existing non-conforming with regards to parking space location. These existing non-conformities have had negative impacts to the West Meadow Drive streetscape. Photos of the above-mentioned properlies have been l 3. attached for reference (Attachment D). Staff believes that the granting of this variance would be a grant special privilege as there are other options that exist {or this property which would not require a variance of this nature. The proposed Four Seasons Reson has excess parking capacity in the proposed structure, which could ,be allocated to Nine Vail Road to replace the 4 surface parking spaces. ln addition, staff believes thal there are alternative designs which stalf believes could be appropriate which would still require a variance. For example, staff believes that locating 2 parking spaces and the minimum area required for a turnaround in the front setback would allow for significant landscaping which would successfully screen the parking. The remaining 2 spaces could be located within the Four Seasons parking structure. While this option would still require a variance, staff believes that it would be the minimum deviation necessary without a grant of special privilege. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes that there will be no negative impact on light and air, distribution of population, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes that the elimination of the curb cut on Vail Road will positively impact the transportation and traffic facilities on Vail Road. The parking area adjacent to West Meadow Drive has been designed to accommodate a lorward motion for exiling, thus minimizing the impacts to West Meadow Drive. However, the proposed parking spaces will add vehicular trips to West Meadow Drive, which staff believes to be a negative impact to transportation and traffic facilities. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Staff believes that other options exist which would minimize or eliminate the need Jor a variance. Specifically, the parking could be relocated within the proposed Four Seasons parking structure. The Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the proposal to relocate the parking at the May 21,2003, and June 4,2003, hearings. The Design Review Board was split in their opinion of the proposal. Some members felt that with adequate landscaping and site walls, the proposal could improve the experience along West Meadow Drive and successfully tie in with the proposed West Meadow Drive streetscape improvements. Other members slated that adding surface parking in the fronl setback would be detrimental to the Town of Vail and did nol believe that there would be adequate room to screen lhe parking area. The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before qrantinq a variance: 4. B. l.' !L tx. :l . That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special prlvilege inconsistent with the limitations on other ,propefties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the followino reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result In practical diificulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsislent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to lhe same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by lhe owners of other properties in the same district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends denial of the request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at Nine Vail RoadiLot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance, the Community Development Deparlment recommends that the following finding be made: 1. That the granting of lhe variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granling of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety or weliare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The stricl literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistenl with the objectives of this litle. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance, staff recommends the followino condition: 1. That prior 1o application for a building permit, the applicant musl return to the Design Review Board for final review and approval of all improvements. 2. .ATTACHMENTS A. Applicant's Statement of Request B. Vicinity Map C. Reductions of Plans :D. Photos of Adjacent Properties E. Publication Notice 't. 10 Altachment. B Attachment: C '1 ""i itFifg I ti lnrIrj t,/ :a n (!.c ar ;il*'l -: u)6 1^,\\t llt) E(ood,pHn ftl ,q .r / -)Eo> z zYtiscil M=Ed Il;i N?II J ! i-x g? U:(A 4)EECri l/.^v -o (goEg - gg S€i/ -f io> 2 ZzEEi rJrr:iS MZ|AT THI{,;?Erl x?Eii r:l '.----.- I t:) I * _ll c) .outl) -o (do&,e =Ep-(dE$) r'Fo> -z !t:tIi EI 1 EB Ei rE 5r (d X IJ.J 1^v v{r"zEt!d! =Ei:?i nq li tltlll.---' ';, 1 t tl c) l! lt, -o (dod,n =€H-(u Es) =Fos- 2 r;ffi MSlEz =EiiiNZI!: -lJ (\,r *IIJ 1^.\v \ rf; (! a) <b 0Jio-v(UrrU-ttt .. 9'=CU(sr /^v EGoM.eXcr =-EF{Ei/ i*(l)> 2 ;fi! {ifi ?ir: z !u UJ N 'ill ))-=- I i \=o qJ i. ($rru=v7 ..E#d; /^'\v !!EbH6* '€- : !!:i li rl!I rE z2E t4 --EP.;tu?t;8t:?i Nii -o ($ ou (s o 2 I \ \ I I \ I \ r!? \ I K-4, Attachment: D p0004685.tp9 (1536x1 024x24b jpes) I p0004686.jpg (1 536x 1024x24b jpeg) t,, p0004687.jp9 (1536x1024x24b jpeg) p0004690jp9 (1536x1024x24b jpeg) p0004691 .jp9 ( 1536x 1024x24b jpeg) p000a692jpg (1 536x1024x24b jpeq) p000a69a.Jpg ( 1 536 x1024x24h jpes|l po004695jpg (1 536x1 024x24b ipes) ;1, /ail Sateway Plaza Condominium \ssn 'O Box 19157 rvon, CO 81620 )AB InvestmenL lnc /b/a Holiday Inn Chateau Vail 'O Box 11939 )enver, CO 80211-0939 ,yman, Sylvia Rebeca c/o Johnson, lrown & Speigel rttn: Brenda Brown 00 Bishop St .A5 .tlanta, GA 30318 'illage Inn Place - Phase V )onclominium Assn 00 E Meadorv Dr 'aii, CO 8i657 ,S Condominium Assn 0403 W Colfax Ave ,akewood, CO 80215 'VIP 502 603 Annaway Dr dina, IvOi 55436 'illa Cortina Condominium Assn O Box l0t2 'ail, CO 81658 leadow Vail Place Condominium .ssn 1W Meadow Dr ail, CO 81657 ico Vail Inc 'o Slifer Mgmt 13 E Meadow Dr Ste 360 ait, CO 81657 sakis LLC o Watson & Co Inc )670 E Bethany Dr Bldg 4 urora, CO 80014 Attachment; E Village Inn Place - Phase Itr Condominium Assn 27 Windward Rd ,:, 143 E Meadorvs Dr Belvedere, CA94920 Vail Village HOA POBoxT3 Recliff, CO 81649 , Gail M. & Stephen R. Rineberg 7475 Guney Ranch Rd 9E y"-Vriffift iientat MgmtScottsdale, A285258 Staufer Commercial LLC 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Sonnenalp Properties Inc 20 Vail Rd Vail, CO 81657 Daymer Corp NV 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Claggett/Rey Gallery LLC 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Hanlon Family Pertnership 385 Gore Creek Dr Vail, CO 81657 Vail i08 Ltd c/o Westar Bank l Admin Center . ::; .1. P O Box 1210 Cypsum, CO 81637 Masters Gallery At Vail LLC 70 S Potomac St Aurora, CO 80012 Red Sands Corp c/o Vail Home Rentals Inc 143 E Meadow Dr Ste 397 Vail, CO 81657 Robert M. Euwer & Barbara D. Euwer Revocable Trust 7 E Gallup St Littleton, CO 80120 Maureen T. O Dea 16450 W Sunset Blvd 302 Pacific Palisades, CA 9021 2 Linda C. Dickinson Qualitied Personal Residence Trust 9200 Hollyoak Dr Bethesda, MD 20814 David G. & Cathy L. Crane c/o D.G. Crane 2485 Broadway San Francisco, CA 94115 Thomas F. Sheridan, Vincent D. Walsh 1808 Swann St NWr' \ington, DC 20009 Ponch Inc - Trio Inc c/o Jefferson P Knoght PA 777 Bricknell Ave #1070 Miami, FL 33131 Eugene, Jr & Sue B. Mercy 1111 Park Ave New York, NY 10128 Vail 214 Corp 44 Meadow Dr 44 Vail, CO 81657 Meadow Place Inc c/o Invicta America Attn: Suzett€ P O Box 551600 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33355 i,, Pencles Realty Inc 44 W Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Obering lrrevocable Trust 5251 DTC Parkway 425 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 I William A. & Ronnie N. Potter 1130 Park Ave New York, NY 10128 William W. Graham 11661 San Vincenle Blvd 401 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Charlene Caruso Revocabl.e Living Trust 2428N i2th Cr Ft Lauderdale, FL 33304 Judith & Joel Baker 20 Dolma Rd Scarsdale, NY 10583 James W. & Eilen V. Pinkard 3440 Youngfield St Ste 351 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Pericles Realty lnc c/o Otto Peterson & Post P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 Spraddle Creek Properties Inc. c/o James B. Newman 150 Govemment St Ste 2000 Mobile, N-36602 Hilda O. Farrill Avila Attn: B. Brandon Ansbacher House Jennet St George Town Grand Cayman Cayman Islands BWI David William Hanna Trustee c/o Hanna Capital Management, Inc 620 Newport Center Dr Ste 500 Newport Beach, CA92660 Luis P. & Huguette D. Bustamante c/o Vail Realty & Renral Mgmt 302 Hanson Ranch Rd Vai1, CO 81657 Margaret T. Fuller 5i23 S Perry Cir Littleton, CO 80123 RL Exempt Corp c/o Frederick S. Otto P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 JAF Industrial Dev P O Box 6688 Somerset, NJ 08875-6688 Seviher Corp c/o Burke Mgmt P O Box 2631 Vaii, CO 81658 William & Ann F. Loper 22 W Meadow Dr360 Vail, CO 81657 Michael S. & Iris Smith 2 Sedwick Dr Englewood, CO 80110 Richard T Liebhaber and Kirsten E Liebhaber Personal Res. Trust P O Box 8210 Mclean, YA22\06-8210 Meek Family Trust John F. & Jerris P. Ferguson, Terry O. Meek 5326 Clayhill Dr Spnngfield, MO 65804 575M LLC 18 Springfield Ln Sarasota Springs, NY 12866 /ai1 sundiar r_p yli[^li['r##]'fu'*"* Leo parmas ,/o Russell Standard consulting Group 2775 ris Ave ' o Box 479 g05 Bricknell Bay Dr ste 230 Boulder, Co 80304 I )ridgeville, PA 15017 Miami, FL 31131 Whitebay Marketing Ltd /ail Gateway LLC c/o George D. Pedman Holland & Timberline Commercial Holdings , Worid Financial Center Knight LLC 2th FL 701 Bricknell Ave Ste 3000 12 Vail Rd 600 {ew York, NY 10285-1200 Miami, Fl 33131 Vait, CO 81657 /ail PBK LLC ccc LLC Kilmur LLC 92 Mill Creek Cir P O Box 5963 P O Box 5963 rail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81658 Vail. CO 81658 ames R. & Karen W. Johnson 9 Churchill Rd Vail Gateway Plaza Vail Village Inn Inc ,itrsburgh, pA 15235 12 Vail Rd Ste 600 100 E Meadow Dr 33 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 )iane Gamel Lighthall a r_ ,, _-_ ^ . patricia Ann Gabriel 293 W Oberlin Dr Meadow Dnve Venrures Inc )enver, co 80235 irSri:i;ig,6552 - ^ if"3::,'f,torurr-oru, Karin Wagner Revocable Inter )laus W. Fricke Revocable Trust Vivos Trust Staufer Commercial LLC ldna N. Fricke Revocable Trust Karin Wagner Trustee 100 E Meadow Dr 31 O Box 1557 405 Bonrona Ave Vai1. CO g1657 lagle, CO 81631-1557 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301 ylvan M. & Frances Tobin Marvin J. & Karole A. Frank ol Cheswold Ln 5-D r/a}mer LorP l\ v ravedord, pA re041 l,t;l;fr*.lne Rd 26 3113")":f;t#:,- fiT:H*ft'a Jane Schellet corol G. Jones trusree Guiseppe & Mercedes cecchi .'enrown, pA 18104 a:i!*:, nxr.;;, ili,:sT'ii' :fr::" /illiam P. & Lynda B. Johnson Michael P. & Patricia J. Glinsky \/.;r \/i1._- T-- ^75 Inca parkway 3200 cherry creek s Dr ste 230 vail village Inn Associates ourder, co 803b3 Denver, co 8020e gt?"j::lyfrte & co r,. Denver. CO 80206 llvia Ito de Zaragoza Gary J. & Dorothy Farrell Cordes 302 WI Inc :. O Box 220349 28 Trentino Rd, Turranurra 2074 I Paso, TX 79913 NSW Australia ci o freq urio - uito reterson d( rost P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 , Barbara Wdinstein 78 Joyce Rd P' view, NY 11803 ) Richard T. Liebhaber P O Box 8210 Mcl-ean, YA22106-8210 Kirk D. Huffard 8 Maher Ave Greenwich, CT 06830-5617 Patricia Ann Gabriel 1 E Ridgewood Ave' Paramus, NJ 07653 Staufer Commercial LLC 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Colando CO Priv Antonio Chedraui SA{ Col Encinal 91180 Xalapa Veracruz Mexico Barbara & Charles Dillman 18316 Mainsail Pointe Cornelius, NC 28031 Red Sands Corp c/o Vail Home Rentals Inc 143 E Meadow Dr Ste 397 Vail, CO 81657 Charles M. Harmon, Jr. - Traditions LP 11380 Long Meadow Dr W Palm Beach, FL334I4 f lil-td c/o Bustamante, Luis Paolo Priv. San Isadro 44 Col. Reform Social, Del Miguel 11650 Mexico DF A.J. Property Trust c/o Dreyer Edmonds & Assoc. 355 S Grand Ave Ste 4150 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3103 4725Ltd 80 w 78th Sr Ste 133 Chanhassen, IVft{ 55317 Daymer Corp NV 100 E Meadow Dr Vai, CO 81657 Paul A. & Penelope N. Leseur Somerset Bridge, Sandys SBBX P O Box SB90 Bermuda Town of Vail c/o Finance Dept 75 S Frontage Rd Vail, CO 81657 AlexanderFamily Trust Judy Lynne Alexander Trustee 2i2l N Frontage Rd W Ste 254 Vail, CO 81657 S.C. Geroca 100 E Meadow Dr 101 Vail, CO 81657 Kinney L. Johnson 1100 Homsilver Cir Vail, CO 81657 Raymond J & Mealnie Rutter Family UDT Raymond J Rutter Trustee 760 Via Lido Nord Newport Beach, CA92663 Pedro A. & Adelaida Petunia Ramirez Cond. Caparra Classic Ph-2 105 Ortegon Ave Guaynabo PR 00966 Michael J. Zaremba 6200 Plynouth Ct Downers Grove, IL 60516 Oliver M. & Diana L. Keamey 7565 Spanish Bay Dr Las Vegas, NV 89113 Chris J. & Jennifer A. Anderson 103 Anemone Dr Boulder, CO 80302 John & Rebecca Moore P O Box 728 Del Mar, CA92024-0728 James E. & Jeanne Gustafson P O Box 5010 Norwalk, CT 06856 Floyd L. & Elaine E. English 571 Millbrook Dr Downers Grove, IL 60516 Lario lnc c/o Vail Village Inn 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Lublan S.A. c/o Banco International SA 437 Madison Ave 17th Fl New York, NY 10022 Enchanted Mesa Exempt Corp c/o Frederick S. Otto P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 Douglas Deane Hali, Jr. 2000E 12th Avenue Box 4 Denver, CO 80206 I ierardo ScJuoeder Gonzalez - DE 'atricia Inzunza Schroeder 1 Tunapuna Ln loronado, CA 92i18 ) loger L. Reisher 400 Cheny Creek S Dr#405 )enver, CO 80209-3258 )huck Lipcon )ne Biscayne Tower ,uite 2480 diami, FL 33131 A.J. Property Trust c/o Dreyer Edmonds & Assoc 355 S Grand Ave Ste 4150 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3103 Jeff Moellentine Alpine Standard 28 S Frontage Rd Vail. CO 81657 Firstbank of Vail 17 Vail Rd Vail, CO 81657 Charles Upcon 430 N Marshra Dr Key Biscayne, FL 33149 Approved 6/23103 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Monday, June 9, 2003 PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Gommunity Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT John Schofield Erickson Shirley Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill George Lamb Rollie Kjesbo Gary Hartman Site Vlslts : MEMBERS ABSENT 1:00 pm 1. Ford Park-530 S. Frontage Rd. 2. Front Door 3. Alpenrose - 100 E. Meadow Drive 4. I Vail Road - 9 Vail Road 5. Lionshead Mall- 600 Lionshead Mall Driver: George NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 Publlc Hearino - Town Councll Ghambers 2:00 pm 1. A request for a conditional use permil, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a private outdoor recrealional facility, located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1"t Filing. Applicant: Vail ResortsPlanner: Bill Gibson Bill Gibson gave an overview of the staff memo. Jeff Babb stated that he will let the proposal stand on its merits from last year. The Commission had no comments. Gary Hartman made a motion for approval with 6 condilions: 1. The applicant shall be prohibited from using ouldoor lighting in association with the operation of the trampoline. o Approved 6i/23/03 2. The applicant shall install a post and rail fence 1o enclose the trampoline area, in the same manner as approved by the 2002 conditional use permit and design review approval of the trampoline. 3. The applicant shall be prohibited from installing and displaying any form of advertising signage in association with the operation of the trampoline. 4. The applicant shall install decoralive flower pots, in the same manner as approved by the 2002 conditional use permit and design review approval of the trampoline. 5. The dates of operalion of the trampoline shall be mid-June 2003 through mid- September 2003 and mid-June 2004 through mid-September 2004. The hours of operation during these dates shall be 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Thursday, and 10:00 AM to g:00 PM, Friday through Sunday. 6. This conditional use permit approval shall expire, and become null and void, on September 30, 2004. George Lamb seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village lnn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Vail Town Code, to allow for a change in use, to increase the GRFA and to increase the number of dwelling units, located at the Vail Village Inn, 100 E. Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Edna & Claus Fricke, represented by Fritzlen Pierce ArchitectsPlanner: Matt Gennett Matt Gennett presented an overview of the statf memorandum, noting that the application is a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6. David Baum, representing the applicant, had nothing to add. Rollie Kjesbo asked about the parking mitigation. David Baum stated that he believed the owner was taking steps to address the parking. George Lamb expressed his concern regarding the parking situation. Erickson Shirley asked about the existing parking spaces and that none would be eliminated. Gary Hartman had nothing to add. Doug Cahill stated that an additional condition regarding the parking would be added to this proposal, which will require 3 additional parking spaces. Chas Bernhardt agreed with the other commissioners and stated that the 3 parking spaces would need lo be deeded with this property. John Schofield stated that there should be a deed restriction on the parking spaces, so that it is deeded with this property and asked if a parking plan could be required ol the applicant. Matt Gennett stated that a parking plan could bera reQuirement. Approved 6i/23l03 Doug Cahill clarified that with the 3 new parking spaces required, a parking plan needs to be submitled. Doug Cahill made a motion to recommend approval to the Town Council with 1 condition: 1. That the applicant provides a detailed parking plan depicting where Alpenrose's parking spaces are on sile, as well as those (3) required by the new residence, at the time of the lirst reading of the amending ordinance to the Vail Town Council. Rollie Kjesbo seconded the motion. The molion passed by a vote of 7-0. 3. A request for a variance from Seclion 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front selback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, tnc.Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs presenled an overview of the staff memorandum. Gary Hartman recused himself. Allison Ochs further detailed issues staff has with landscaping and front setbacks as detailed in the staff memorandum and said that slaff is recommending denial of the applicant's proposal. TJ Brink, representing the applicant, gave an overview of existing parking and circulation conditions and the possible alternatives, including their preferred one, using a site plan made visible to the PEC. TJ Brink also described the situation with the existing transformer boxes and how they are working wilh Holy Cross Energy to find a workable solution to the unsightliness and logistical problems posed by their present location. Mr. Brink then went into the criteria of the Staff memo and how he believes lhose criteria are in fact being met. Gwen Scalpello, 9 Vail Road, presenled an argumenl of how the proposed surface parking fits into the context and character of the neighborhood. She then summarized what she is asking is for 4 well-landscaped surface parking spaces. She further stated thal she is not asking lor much in regard to the 4-Seasons proposal and that this concession is not too much to ask for considering the fact that she has a 3-story wing to her building surrounded by very tall (proposed) buildings. Erickson Shirley lhen asked for clarification on the necessity for another curb cut. Gwen Scalpello answered the question using the site plan. Erickson Shirley asked Allison Ochs for staff's preferred alternative. Allison Ochs described statf's preferred alternative. Gwen Scalpello gave the reasons g Vail Road believes the logistics of staff's preferred alternative are an issue for the guest experience. TJ Brink added that those surface spots are only for overflow. Erickson Shirley then stated that people all over town work oul deals to share and swap parking J Approved 6/23103 spaces thereby mitigating parking problems off-site. TJ Brink stated why that will not work in this instance. John Schofield asked for public input, but received none. Doug Cahill agreed with the applicant's concerns and gave comments on several alternatives. He stated that adequate screening and landscaping is paramount considering the work to be done with the Slreetscape plan and placing only three spaces instead of the four would enable adequate landscaping and screening, as well as a sidewalk realignment. He said he does not support the proposal as written. Chas Bernhardt said that parking is always an issue, especially in that area (9 Vail Road). Chas stated that he does not agree with the need for the 4 surface spaces being requested and he further slated that he does not support the application as proposed. Rollie Kjesbo stated he is in favor of statf's recommendation. George Lamb concurred with lhe comments thus far and said he appreciates where the applicant is coming from in terms of not having any spaces in the 4 Seasons, bul that it is a viable solution and should be accepled. Erickson Shirley agreed with staff's recommendation and believes that the 4 Seasons will be true to their word and provide the requested 4 spaces. John Schofield stated that staff has offered an alternalive that decreases the degree of variance being requested and that the Four Seasons has also been accommodating with their offer of spaces in their facility. He further stated that he thinks the applicant should go back and look at the allernatives. He said it is great that you folks are working together to try to resolve the situation, but the proposal is not supported. He then asked if there was any further question or commenls from lhe board and went on to state the choices for Gwen. Doug Cahill made the motion to approve the applicant's request with the conditions listed in the staff memo:1. That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant must return lo lhe Design Review Board for final review and approval of all improvements.2. That the applicant shall revise the plans, subject to Design Review Board review and approval, to indicate 2 surface parking spaces and the minimum area required for a functional turnaround within the lront setback, adjacent to West Meadow Drive. Erickson Shirley asked for clarification on the conditions. George Lamb seconded. John Schofield asked Gwen Scalpello for clarification on her intentions considering the modified approval. Rollie Kjesbo asked for clarification on what is being voted upon with the conditional approval. . Allison Ochs provided clarification. The motion passed by a vote of 4-2, with John Schofield and Chas Bernhardt opposed. 4. A requesl for a conditional use permit, to allow for a seasonal use to accomrnodate an educational, recreational, and cultural use, located at 530 S. Frontage Road/Ford Park, Unplatted. 4 Approved 6/23103 Applicant: Town of Vail/AlPP, represented by Braun Associales, lnc.Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs presented an overview of the staff memorandum. Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicants, stated he has nothing to add. Gary Harlman had no further comments. Doug Cahill stated he does not believe there should be any on-site parking at the building. Chas Bernhardt stated he likes the proposal and what it does for the building. Rollie Kjesbo had no furlher comment. George Lamb had nothing to add. Erickson Shirley liked the proposal. John Schofield stated he thinks it should extend only to November 15th of each year. Rollie Kjesbo made a motion for approval with 5 conditions: 1. That the applicant shall operate the proposed seasonal use lo accommodate an educational, recreational, and cultural use, during the months of May 1 to November 15, annually. 2. That the applicant shall allow no more lhan one vehicle to be parked at Ford Park for the artist in residence. Any additional parking shall be accommodated at the Village parking structure. 3. That the applicant shall allow no exchange or trade of goods to occur within the limits of Ford Park, as prohibited by the Ford Park Management Plan. 4. That the applicant shall limit all vehicular delivery to the structure to the hours of 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. 5. That should the Planning and Environmental Commission find that lhe proposed conditional use is being operated in violation of the conditions outlined herein, or thal lhe proposed conditional use is being operated in violation of any of the requirements of the Ford Park Management Plan, this conditional use permit may be revoked, as outlined in Section 12-16-5: Planning and Environmental Commission Action,Yail Town Code. Chas Bernhardt seconded. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. 5. A request lor a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendmenls to amend Chapler 12-13-4, Requirements by Employee Housing Unit (EHU) Types, Vail Town Code, to amend the Type ll EHU requirements and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicanl: AMS Development Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson Approved 6/23/03 Bill Gibson gave an overview of the staff memorandum. Greg Amsden stated that density is not an issue in this discussion. The applicant is asking for only lwo changes to the definition of Type ll EHUs. Greg continued and stated he does not agree with staff's reason for recommending denial of this application and said should the PEC be concerned with the size of lhe EHUS, the applicant is willing to delete that portion of the application. John Schofield then opened up to PEC discussion and deliberation with a preface oullining the discussion held during lhe pre-meeting. Rollie Kjesbo stated he believes il is more of a change in zoning and Type ll EHUs were written in the way they were in order for them to be ancillary uses. George Lamb stated he is in favor of the concept but also sees the potential pitfalls of its application Erickson Shirley asked if lhe applicant tried to put together the comments and conditions of approval that have been discussed and developed thus far. Erickson stated that if the applicant would put togelher language thal covers all of the comments and concerns voiced thus far that he could be in support of the proposal. Erickson further stated he does not want to keep on going through work sessions to discuss this over and over again and if staff is at a loggerhead with an applicant, you should say so and recommend denial, but offer language that would be acceptable if approved. Bill Gibson identified where the applicant's proposed language and statl's recommendation were noted in the staff memorandum. Gary. Hartman said he is in favor of the concept, but feels there are conditions, such as one covered parking space, that must be incorporated with any approval. Doug Cahill agreed with all of Gary's commenls and had nothing to add except that a minimum lot size, perhaps 25,000 feet, should be imposed. Chas Bernhardt stated he is in favor of the concept, but it needs more massaging and to sit down wilh staff to work it all out. John Schofield gave a recap of the thoughts expressed so far and the reasoning behind why some of those issues have been raised. He continued by summarizing how manyType ll EHUs have been built thus far and why. He said that the floodgates will not open as a result of this application being approved as proposed, and it is the PEC's job to make sure that they do not. He said specifics should include a 25,000 sq. ft. lot size minimum, appropriate parking and storage be provided, and that the language concerning the EHU being physically and aesthetically integrated into the slructure. John Schofield then ceded the Chair to Erickson Shirley so that he could make a motion. John Schofield then made a motion to approve the applicant's proposalwith 4 conditions and language suggested by staff in the memorandum: 1. That for-sale Type ll EHUs shall be a conditional use. 2. That Type ll EHUs shall be required a minimum of one enclosed parking space and adequate additional storage, as determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission. That Type ll EHUs shall be physically and aesthelically integrated into a primary residence ol the property. That the minimum lot size required for a for-sale Type ll EHU shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission. 6 3. 4. Approved 6/23103 George Lamb seconded the motion The motion passed by a vote of 6-1, with Rollie Kjesbo opposed. Erickson Shirley ceded the chair back to John Schofield. The applicant asked for clarification concerning the motion. John Schofield gave clarification on what the PEC believes should be part of the standards and criteria. Slaff also asked for clarification on the motion. John Schofield provided such. 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to Title 'l2,Zoning Regulations, VailTown Code, to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulalions in the Hillside Residential (HR), Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two-Family Residential (R), Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential(PS), ResidentialCluster (RC), Low Density Multiple-Family (LDMF), Medium Density Multiple-Family (MDMF), High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF), and Housing (H) districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vicki Pearson, et.al.Planner: BillGibson Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Chas Bernhardt stated that he is in favor of eliminating GRFA and feels like the problems of any alternative will not be any worse than those today and wants to see the integrity of homes being built protected. Doug Cahill is in favor of simplifying GRFA and said to get rid of credits and would like to see a comfortable definition of basements if they are not to count. Gary Hartman would like to see GRFA go away and use setbacks, height, FAR and said that gross square footage should be used which would include everything such as garages, mechanical rooms, storage rooms, closet, etc. Erickson Shirley leels like they have spoken about this before and would like to see some solid language for basemenls and such. He said he feels like this is going no where and feels like they can work through the basement question in terms of a definition. George Lamb stated that he attended the focus group meeling and felt that they were very beneficial and thought it was great to hear what others think of GRFA. Rollie Kjesbo stated that he also attended a focus group meeting and thought lhe Greg Cummings house was a good example and feels they should do away with GRFA. John Schofield stated that the locus group should be focusing on what and how GRFA should be eliminated and maintain the integrity of the homes being built. His goal is to approve a regulalion which will work and not need to be changed in a couple years. He said that the Commission was clear about eliminating GRFA and pul in place a system which protects homes as they are being built today and that the Commission still wanls an analysis of the 200 lots and how lhey would be affected if GRFA was eliminated. George Ruther asked a queslion regarding how slopes and hazards would be taken into accounts in the 200 lots. 7 Approved 6/23103 John Schofield explained his logic. George Ruther explained how slopes and other hazards are addressed in designing homes and how they affect the lot. Some hazards can be mitigated; others can not. John Schofield stated that volume measurement has many problems and it is not a good tool and to make the replacement simple and flexible. He said he shares Erickson's lrustration that the project cannot move forward, however, going a little slower may produce something lasting. He feels that the DRB and PEC should have a joint worksession to ask DRB what they need to keep things in line if GRFA is eliminated. Doug Cahill asked to see some data on how many houses are maxed out on site coverage. John Schofield responded that a report was done earlier. George Ruther slated that lols over 21,000 square feet do not have site coverage as a restriction as much as smaller lots. Chas Bernhardt asked staff to look at all lots under 21,000 square feet and see that they have architectural integrity. George Ruther stated that at the focus sessions, stafl was surprised to hear architects speak to the positives of GRFA. John Schofield wants language drafted which will obtain good design and he also heard that basements should be excluded. George Ruther stated the issues regarding basements are not counting towards GRFA and it was discussed that leaks can be found in most language. Erickson Shirley reiterated lhat he just wants to see some language, so that the board can respond. John Schofield discussed the addition of an amnesty period for people may have illegal space they want to make legal. He then went through the questions in the staff report and gave guidance. The board gave a thumbs up on the questions. Chas Bernhardt stated that with setback, site coverage, and height, all we need to do is add an architectural integrity layer. George Ruther staled that GRFA is FAR in other communilies and why does it not work here. Gary Hartman stated the difference is that an FAR does not have credits. George Ruther continued that we give credits to people after they hit the limits ol their buildable atea. Bill Gibson asked if anyone had any design criteria language. John Schofield stated specific language from the DRB is needed. Chas Bernhardt made a molion to table this application lo June 23,2003. The motion was seconded by George Lamb. The motion passed by a vote ol 7-0. 7. A requesl for a worksession to discuss the following applications: a recommendation ro the Vail 8 Aporoved 6/23/03 Town Council of a text amendment to Section 12-7B'-13, Density Control, Zoning Regulations; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed rezoning of Lols P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village sth Filing from Public Accommodation'zone district (PA)io Parking zone district (P); a requesl for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council forthe proposed zoning of an unplatled parcel of land commonly referred to as the "trade parcel" and Lots 1 & 2, Mill Creek Subdivision to Ski Base Recreation ll zone district; a requesl for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code, to allow for the relocation of lhe common property line between Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village Srh Filing; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Code of a proposed major subdivision, pursuant to Section 1 3-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the platting of lhe "lrade parcel"; a request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 16, Title 12, of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a "private off-street vehicle parking facility and public park" to be constructed and operated on Lots P3& J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5'n Filing; a request for an exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-78-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Lodge at Vail; a request for a variance from Section 1 2-21 - 10, Development Restricted, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 17, Variances, Zoning Regulations, lo allow for the conslruction of mulliple-family dwelling units on slopes in excess of 407o; and a request for the establishment of an approved development plan to facilitate the construction ol Vail's Fronl Door, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (A more complete metes and bounds legal description is available at the Town ol Vail Community Developmenl Department) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Jay PetersonPlanner: George Ruther George Ruther gave a presentation per the staff report. Jay Peterson stated thal he had nothing to add. The only change was that the loading and delivery spaces were removed. John Schofield asked Jay if the removed loading and delivery would show up in the Vail Front Door project. Jay Peterson stated, yes. Andy Litman, has an office in the Village and is representing Lwelyn Wells, who owns several units in the area who is not opposed to development, but is concerned over loading and delivery and how it is going to work. He said the first request would be to wait to vole on these conditional uses untilthey see Vail's Front Door, as he was concerned over how and where the 14 bays will work al Vail's Front Door. He was also concerned over consolidating all the loading and delivery until the information to make a good decision is present and finally, in looking at the transportation master plan the goal is to consider all sites. Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowner's Association, said the Association has been in favor of revitalizing the Village and Lionshead and the two proposed large truck bays at this location would have caused problems, as all the movement could not take place on site. He said homeowners in the area have promoted vans and trucks being used for deliveries and he feels the projecl is well within the goals of the homeowner's association. He said the notion of a public park does nol mean publicly funded, but accessible to the public. John Schofield asked Jim how the vehicle size should be addressed. Jim Lamont responded that lhe Swiss Chalet site and Vail's Front Door will be privately run. Jay Peterson talked about the need to get approval at the July 14,2003 meeling and he is fine with the approval being contingent on Vail's Front Door. Rollie Kjesbo asked who would maintain the park? tl fuproved 6/23103 Jay Peterson said the condo association for parking space owners. Rollie Kjesbo asked who will controlthe small vehicle loading at this site. George Ruther stated that there is no loading & delivery on site and il it is felt that there needs to be space for vans and small trucks, we need to have that discussion. Chas Bernhardt suggested that maybe all the merchants should get together and purchase a spol to serve as small vehicle loading and delivery and share it. Jim Lamont slated that an option might be that the Town should purchase a space to serve as loading and delivery. Rollie Kjesbo asked about snow melt on Hanson Ranch Chute or sidewalk? Jay Pelerson staled that the sidewalk is heated, but the road is not, unless it becomes a steeper grasde. Greg Hall stated that this slope would require heat if it were built today. George Lamb asked again about loading and delivery. Greg Hall addressed the question. Erickson Shirley had a concern over the narrowing of the area on Gore Creek, where vehicles currently park illegally and is concerned over enforcement of no parking. Jay Peterson spoke to the narrowing as a result of discussions with Greg Hall to not provide a large enough area to park and he also added that they could park in that space in the structure. Erickson Shirley asked if the space is occupied, where are they going to go. Discussion ensued regarding the heated pavers that will be there. Erickson Shirley brought up the idea of offering the spots up for resale to people in the area for firsl refusal by the condominium before opening the sale to just anyone. Jay Peterson stated that was the intention and a list will be kept by the association. Gary Hartman is glad to see loading and delivery gone, as he thought it was a bad idea and glad to see the plat will be cleaned up. Doug Cahill is glad lo see the plat cleaned up. He menlioned the underground parking under the Hanson Range Chute and what the Town will receive for that use. Jay Peterson stated that that discussion will occur when you look at the off-site improvemenls beyond those required by this project. Doug Cahill said he would like to see the right of first refusal for people in the area whenever a parking space comes up for sale. Chas Bernhardt likes the project and thinks heating the surface deck and Hanson Range Chute should be done. Jay Peterson stated that walkways are heated and would like to come to a conclusion on the road with staff. l0 Approved 6/23103 John Schofield recapped the comments and talked about new language lor maintenance and first refusal on resale of parking spaces. He asked Jim Lamont to provide some ideas on how loading and delivery should begin to be incorporated into these projects. Rollie Kjesbo made a motion to table this until June 23, 2003. Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. 8. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for an amendment to the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and setting forth delails in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg HallPlanner: Warren Campbell Warren Campbell gave a brief presentation per the staff memorandum. Greg Hall gave a presentation on the history of the project. Joe Kracum gave presentation of the proposed West and East Meadow Drive streetscape designs. He identified how the proposal responds to the goals and needs of the neighborhood and Town. He said lhe new streetscape designs addresses pedestrian needs, drainage, traffic flow, and public plaza areas. Doug Cahill asked about the design of the Talisman parking lot. Joe Kracum stated that the design reluctantly allows vehicular access to the Talisman. Greg Hall commented that no gates on the street are a preferred alternative and stated that the street furnishings and lighling will be reviewed by the DRB. He made a presentation on the proposed Vail Village streelscape design with the major focus of the effort to improve the design along the Lodge Promenade and improve the connection from Meadow Drive to Gore Creek Drive and Vail Village. Greg discussed improvemenls to Wall Street and the Children's Fountain. Jim Lamont stated that the proposed plans are a vision for Vail and staff has delivered a qualitative plan that works for Vail. He said the question remains, however, how do we pay lor these improvements, as all of these improvemenls are financially justifiable. Jim urged that the Commission to approve the project and that the Council fully fund this project. Gary Hartman was in favor of the master plan addendum and the plan musl address the disconnect between Vail Village and the ski yard. Doug Cahill believed that this was a great master planning tool. He asked how the plan addressed the eastern most end of East Meadow Drive. Greg Hall talked about the improvements that Vail Mountain Lodge and the Mountain Haus have already installed and were recommended improvements. Chas Bernhardt asked what the main street surfaces would be? Greg Hall staled that most slreets would be a form ol decoralive pavers. Rollie Kjesbo stated that he believed that the plan was on the right track and agreed with the use of a combination of paver materials. ll Approved 6/23103 George Lamb believed that the most important aspect of the proposal was lo ensure continuity amongst the improvemenls. Erickson Shirley stated that implementation was the key to the plan. He questioned the need to heat our streets. John Schofield commented that he agreed largely with the comments of Jim Lamonl. He slated lhat funding and implementation were an unresolved issue. He asked for options for funding alternatives at lhe time of final review. John stated that snowmelt could be problematic in the absence of a cgordinated operator. Gary Hartman made a motion to table this to July 14, 2003 George Lamb seconded this motion. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. L A request for a conditional use permit, 1o allow for an outdoor dining deck, in accordance with Section 12-78-48, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, located at the Vista Bahn Building, 333 Hanson Ranch Hoad/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1" Filing. Applicant: Remonov & Company, Inc., represented by Knight Planning Services, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson TABLED UNTIL JUNE 23, 2OO3 10. Approval of May 12, 2003 minutes 11. Information Update The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office localed at the Town of Vail Community Developmenl Department, TS South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Community Development Department l2 ZEHREN AND ASS9CTATES, rNC. May 9,2003 Allison Ochs Department of Community Development Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Nine Vail Road Variance Application Allison: This letter is to describe the nature of the variance requested and the specific explanation of why the variance is required and why the strict or literal interpretation of the specific regulation would result in a physical hardship or practical difficulty. Additionally, it is the intent of this letter to address items a. through d. as described in the application submittal requirements. The requested variance is an exception from Section 12- 7A-11of the Vail Town Code excluding parking and loading from required front setback areas. Nine Vail Road Condominium Association currently has twenfy-seven indoor parking spaces accessed fidrn rffest Meadow Drive and four outdoor spaces accessed from the adjacent Chateau Vail site. No legal easement exists for vehicuiar access to these outdoor spaces rendering the parking unusable. Reasonable Engineering practice would not allow for access to the existing spaces within the current property boundaries along Vail Road. A strict or literal interpretation of the specific regulation would result in either: ^rF , /'' 1. A further reduction of deficient parking standards on this site through elimination of the four" spaces or; 2. Allowing the four spaces to be located within a front setback along West Meadow Drive as identifred by town staff. Items a. through d. of the application submittal requirements: a. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The requested vaiance would have no efect on existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity becawe it would utilize and existing curb cut and driveway on West Meadow Dive. ARCHITECTURE . PLANNINC . INTERIORS . LANDSCAPT ARCHITECTURT Zetren and Associates, Inc 20021471.01 Nine Vail Road Variance Criteria ) 5/1212003. i b. The degree to which relief or from the slrict or literal interpretation and enforcem€nt of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title rvithout grant of sp€cial privilege. Relieffrom the strict or literal interpretation and enforcentent of a specified regulation would be necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the ficinity. Other sites within the vicinity thal currently albw for parking witltin the front setback urea in violation of the zoning code are the Vail Fire Station, Vail Village Inn, Alphorn Condominium, Skaal Haw Condominium, and Meadow I/ail Place Condominium. c. The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic, facilities, utilities, and public safety. There would be no ffict on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, factlities, or utilities. The effects of the vaiance on trffic and public safety would be beneficial in that an existing curb cut, driveway, and intersection would be eliminated from Vail Road; a higher sp eed, higher capacity thoroughfare. d. How the request complies with the adopted Town of Vail planning policies and devclopment objectives. The req'uest complies with the atlopred planning polices and development objectives in that it would provide for: o Public improvements on Vail Road funded with pivate monEl . Intreased vehicalar and pedestrian safety along Vail Road. . Integration of public and private streetscape improvemenE aloag Wesl Meadow Drive. t Neither an increase nor decrease in compliance with adopted parking standards (required number of spaees). Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the information presented. Additionaily, if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerelv. Timothy R. Losa, A.I.A. Senior Associate Zetren & Associates, Inc. Site Area Nine Vail Road Public Accommodation (PA) Zone Percent of Site Area Total Areas Existinq Landscaoe Area Landscape Area Hardscape Area Prooosed Landscap€ Area Landscape Area Hardscape Area Exislinq Parkino Existing Indoor Prooosed Outdoor (Reolac€ment) Total Parkinq Reouirements Condominium Units Existino Parkino Parlcng Deficiency Site Area 24346 Site Coveraoe 65% 18,424.9 Area I 1 ,368 1,700 Area 11,160 273 Landscaoino Hardscaoe 30% 20% 8,503.8 1,700.8 AllowableArea Difference 8,503.8 2,864 1,700.8 1 AllowableArea Difference 8,503.8 2,656 1,700.8 1,428 Total Parkinq al 3l Parkino/Unit TotalParkinq 1.4 37.8 31 6.8 Condominium i Project t{ame: ProJect Description: ,r-m Participants: OWNER HOUDAY HOUSE CONOMINIUM A5504/2612004 phone: 476-3328 9 VAIL ROAD VAIL co 816s7 License: APPUCANT HOUDAY HOUSE CONOMINIUM A5504/2612004 phone; 476-3328 9 VAIL ROAD VAIL co 81657 License: ProjectAddress: 9VAILRDVAIL Locauon: 9VAILROAD Legal Description: Lot: 9-B Block Subdlvision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 210107106001 Comments: Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co,us DRBNumber: DRB040149 REMOVE LARGE LOMBARDI POPI.AR TREE LOCATED SOUTH OF BUILDINGS FRONT DOOR ALONG VAIL ROAD. BOARD/STAFF ACTTOil Motion By: Rogers Second By: Hanlon Vote: 4-0 Conditions: Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 05/05/2004 Cond: 8 (P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail sbff and/or the appropriate reniew committee(s). Cond: 0 (P|-AN): DRB approval does not constihlte a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB appro\ral shall not become valid for 20 dap following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0005413 l.-,-ffi of the Request: L UTT,LF63 F|L Locauon of the proposal;ot: B anct: Physical Address: Zoning: Name(s) of Owner(s):AIL IIOA RECEIYE-T; .,.' i' .' ,: q,lA) E-mail Address: Application for Design Review Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us General Information: All poects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. please refer to.the submittal requirements for the particulir approvat that is requesied. An a-pptication for Design Reviewcannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community oevel'opment Depaament. Theproject may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the plannini and Envronmental commission.Design review approval lapses unless a building p€rmit is issued and construction commenes withinone year of the approval. Lonnfnntr ?oPq (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: Mailing Address: 8 tar7 Type of Review and Fee: n Signs/ 0 Conceptual Review tr New Construction E Minor Alteration (single-family/du plex) \,/_-.;GDlanges to Approved Plans Ftr Separation Request (5n No Fee $6s0 $20 $20 No Fee Plus $1.00 per sguare foot of total sign area. For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such at reroofing, painung, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For revisions to plans already approved by planning Staff or the Design Review Board. For Office Use 0nlv: . . - t Fee Paid: -'? (\t}:' check No.f6V I b By: /IOl. DRB No.: }S Cc,-"d,1 ;{"sot- Dati: -f Planner:Project No.: iLb Page 1 of L3ltLlLT/o3 w buV 0q""* *****r.1.****:f X**1.*******:** j.rF***************rr**rr*rrt **{r******{.****tr*rt *:tt r.'F:t*{.,r****x***{.*!r.****** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemenr *****{.,1.*******{.1.****r.*{.*t!******!fr**************ir****{.*'},}****{.**{.*,*,***{.:t ***{.*****r.************ Statement Nuriber: R0400O5682 Anount: $250.00 04/26/2OO4O4:02 pM Palment Method: Check Inits .fS Notation: #15456/HOT,IDAY HOUSE CONDO ASSOC, Permit No: DRB040149 Tt4)e: DRB-Minor Alt, Cornm/Mult i Parcel Nor 210107106 0 0 t Site Address: 9 VAIL RD VAIIJ Irocation: 9 VAIIJ ROAD Total Fees: $250.00This Palment: $250.00 Totsal AIJIJ Pmts: $250.00 Balance: $0.00 *****{.rr****,r****:t ***,tr********!t ****:i*****t ,r*****:r*****r.*************rf *rtr}*rtttr}**,t:}**++**++'t!t**+ ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code DescriDtion Curnent Pmts DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES 250.00 tl Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Devdopment 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www,ci.vail.co.us Prcject l{ame: Holiday House hot-tub replacement DRB Number: DRB030385 Project Description: Replace existing fiberglass hot tub with new stainless steel B x 13' hot tub with Trex covering in "madeira". Participants: OWNER HOIIDAYHOUSEASSOCATION 09/05/2003 Phone:479-7100 9 VAIL RD VAIL CO. 81657 License: APPUCANT PTARMIGANMANAGEMENT 09/05/2003 Phone:476-3328 62 EAST EAST MEADOW DR vAIt- co 81557 License: Project Addrcss: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Location: 9 VAIL RD tcgal Description: Lot: 1 Block Subdivision: VAIL VITIAGE 2ND Parcel Number: 210107106000 Comments: seeconditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Mouon By: Action: SrAFFAPR Second By:Vote; DateofApproval: 09/18/2003 Conditionsr Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review commitee(s). Entry: 09/18/2003 By: EE Action: AP Visible sides of hot tub to be covered with composite decking material to match existing pavers, Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: $250.00 i/ i TOI44VM one year of the appnoval. Descriotion of the Requestl t'..1€^/C Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2739 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us General Information: All prqects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Depatment. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Desagn r€view approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within .-Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Name(s) of Owner(s)r ttousE Corbo Location ofthe Proposal: Lot: Physical Address: parcef No.: TtwTrodozl Type of Review and Fee: D Signs E Conceptual Review D New Constructiontr Addition ,{ Minor Alterationt \(muhi-family/commercial) tr Minor Alteration (single-family/du plex) tr Changes to Approved Plans tr Seoaration Reouest 'fttL Pd4) $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans Design Review Board. No Fee already approved by Planning Staff or the >l<9wner(s) si gnature(s) : WrcZ. ffi JOINT PROPERW OWNER WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER I0il,hi I, (pri , a joint owner of property located at (address/legal description) I t/4r,- pa+r, provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Depaftment for the proposed improvements to be completed at the address noted above. I understand that the proposed improvements include: I further understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations. Q -orl-oz (Date) Wfulbuse nt name) 1{o4' Page 2 of r2lO2lO7lO2 Th9 t+;r -DtB /rlecls to % Rtpt*=r?l Atf*-zAe OF Lc"+ktt{ 6 PC,,wtBd 6 t.-F Nor,t Nq:,,^l Vz H"f-rr,^-b t{or n^q A.4ar* t6" t'Jruu ft? trJ TR,s t'x t)' I n^Ail . ft Aute G4.+\g . /{aca Ail\ \,0 tut, \ 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 970-479-2\38 F|\X970419-2452 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMf,NT ryA-X TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FA.,Y FRO]VI: DATE: .}TnflI'. d/>^- # oF PAGIS rlt DOCUiVmNT CNOT TNCLUDTNG CO\rSR SEEET) RESPONSE REQUIIIID?r ..Zp SENT BY TO\YN OF VAIL CO}IIVIUNITY DEYSLOPMNNT X'A,\ # 970479.2452 T0lvfl oF YAIL CONtrYIIINITY DEyTLOPMENT TELEPHONE #__:zo-r.Zg:Agq_ AND NOTES: F:EVERYONE\FORMS\FaxSh€.t ? 75 Sourh Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 970-479-2138 FAX970-479-2452 C OI:YIMUNITY DE YEL OP]VIENT FAX TRAT{SMITTAL SIIEET COIVIPAT{Y NAlVlE: FAX TELEPHOT\E NUMBER: FROM: # oF PAGES rN DOCtftr[NT CNOT TNCLIIDTNG COyEri. SHEET) RISPONSE REQIIIRED? SENTBY TOWN OT,VAIL COMI'yIUNITY DE\ruLOPMENT FA-.X # 97}479-2452 TOIYN OF VAIL COtflvrIINIIy DEVELOPMENT TELEPEONE #_s70-4ze-319!_ SPECIAL COTVI}IENTS AND NOTES: ,l F :E VERYONE\FORIvIS\FaxShed t Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 faxj. 970.479.2452 web: www.ci,vail.co.us Prcject Name: Holiday House hot-tub replacement DRB Number: DRB0303B5 Proiect Description: Replace existing fiberglass hot tub with new stainless steel B x 13' hot tub with Trex covering in "saddle", Participants: OWNER HOLIDAYHOUSEASSOCATION O9l05l2OO3 Phone:479-71ff) 9 VAIL RD VAIL CO. 816s7 License: APPLICANT PTARMIGANMANAGEMENT 0910512003 Phone:476-3328 62 EAST EAST MEADOW DR VAIL, CO 81657 License: ProjectAddress: 9VAILRDVAIL location: 9VAILRD tcaal Descriptlon: Lot: 1 Block: Subdivision: VAIL VILI-AGE 2ND Parcel Number: 210107106000 Comments: seeconditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By! Action: STAFFAPR Second By:Vote: DateofApproval: 09/18/2003 Conditions: Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Entry: 0911812003 By: EE Action: AP Visible sides of hot tub to be covered with composite decking material to match existing pavers. Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: $25O.OO clnt i rmat I on Reeort - Memory Send Page 0ate & T lme L ine I E-rai I Machine lD 001 Sep-|8-03 0l:43pm sl047s2152 T0lll! 0F VAlt Ctlil'lul{lTY DEVELOPIf,IIT Job nunber Da te Tor Nurnber of pages Start t ime End t i|||e Pages sent Status Job number : 379 JTU Sep-|8 0l:41rur 491765803 002 Sep-l8 0l :41pn Sep-I8 0l:43pn 002 OK *** SEND SUCCESSFUL +*+ ) . 75 So\:th Frorriag. R.oad'- vail. CO 4a6579'7o.4'79-2739E.A><.970-4?9-2452 co1.f1r$4rrr{r:fY DE r/Er-oPtvrEr{T 4-.. -*^ srvET:fAr- srrEET DATE:tnt'E,,, 4- - # o-'pacEs rr\r Dctcrttw:E:N'r Gqol:mrcr-ripr.r6, g g1rga1 sr*r:r-zr -/ RESPO]STSE TEQIJ"EED ST1\[T BY Tcrlv!{ oF \zArr- 1ro.5/r\r oF'ltA.E- C Olvnw[rFrf,r:r. Dt\ZEI-CtPr\.lEI{tr FA- *f COlr',I1\dIIIt{I1ff DE1aEI-OFA&I{ar Ttr-EPE(O!{t € I014,[,tn Proiect Name: Project DescripUon: Proiect Address: Legal Description: Parel l{umber: Comments: OWNER HOLIDAY HOUSE ASSOCATION 0910512003 Phone: 479-7100 9 VAIL RD VAIL CO. 81657 License: APPLICANT PTARMIGAN MANAGEMENT 09/05/2003 Phone: 475-3328 52 EAST EAST MEADOW DR VAIL, CO 81657 License: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teh, 970.479.2L39 far:. 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us DRBNumber: DRB030385 fiberglass hot tub with new stainless steel 8 x 13' hot tub with Trex covering in Location: 9 VAIL RD LoB 1 Block Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE zND 210107106000 see conditions Motion By: Seoond By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Approval: 09/18/2003 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Entry: 09/18/2003 By: EE Action: AP Visible sides of hot tub to be covered with composite decking material to match existing pavers. Cond:0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Planner: ElisabethEckel DRB Fee Paid: 325O.OO Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-21 38 FAX 970-479-2452 www.ci.vail.co.us August 21,2003 Gwen Scalpello PO Box 160 Vail, CO 81658 RE: 9 Vail Road Condominlums / Part ot Lots A, B, and C, Vail Village 2d Filing Dear Gwen, The Holiday House and Holiday Inn were developed during the same time period and by the same developer, according to the information documented in lhe Town ol Vail files for these two properties. However, currently, the properties are subdivided and owned by separate entities. In recent history, the development potential for each site has been based on the lot area of each individual property. Statf does not believe that it has been adequately demonstrated that g Vail Road Condominiums has a legal right to additional parking on the Chateau property. The documentation provided to the Town ot Vail indicates that 9 Vail Road has had a revocable easement agreement for access across the Chateau propefi, to the 4 parking spaces on 9 Vail Road Condominium property. lf you have other documentation, indicating that you have legal rights or a lease for parking on someone else's property, staff will be glad to assist you with your parking issues. I hope this letter provides you with the information you need. lf you have any further questions, please do not hesilate to contact me at 970-479-2369. I would be glad to discuss this with you further. Sincerely,4, ,. /' /11//r"A- Allison Ochs, AICP Planner ll Town of Vail {S o"n"uor ru, .,' ,-ffi ACTION FORM Department of Oommunity Development 75 South Fontage Road, Vail, Colomdo 81657 telt 970.479.2139 fa><: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail,co.us Project l{ame: DRB Number: DRB03014B Project Description: Common Element - Relocate four parking spaces in front setback Participants: OWNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 05/1212003 phone: 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES CA 90035 License: APPUCANT Nine Vail Road Condo Assoc &05/1212003 Phone: 479-1788 POB 160 Vail, CO Gscalpello@attflobal.net 81658 . License: P|otect Addrcss: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Locataon! Nine Vail Road Legal ltescription: Lot: 9-B Block Subdivision: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcel Number: 210107106001 Commenb: BOARD/STAFF ACnOil Mo6on By: Action: CONCEPT Second By:Vote: DateofApproval: Conditions: Cond: 8 (P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate revieur committee(s). Cond: 0 (PIAN): DRB approval does not consUtute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Planner: Allison Ochs DRB Fee Paad: $25O.OO .i S"^lplt" r-.-1"f-' :ISDO ,,.../,/ / /'h///05 , CArzrl ,,-ffi Name(s) of Owner(s): Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Appli".n,, {i ("J Mpflinsaaa."'.'f-4E:d!9,V,ilfa.8lU-SSl gZty\,.L{L A',.. S..^*t , $u:L. 4oo, innarAtis. lnN- sfqbz- . Signs $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.. Conceptual Review No Fee . New Oorstruction $650 For construction of a new building or demo,lrebuild. ' Addition $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residenlial or MinorArteration $2s0 Hlffi:?if#lil',J'[:lil1il"'fl.":,tj 1ff,:J:S:K:ffi::*)(multi-family/commercial) reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and Minor Arteration $20 l:tlilil3'X?iiffi1iio buiunss and ste improvements, such *r, R E C E I V E 0(single-family/duplex) reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retainins watts. etc. MAY ! ? 2003 Changes to Approved Plans $20 For revisions to plars already approved by Planning Staff or itie' Design Review Board. Separation Request No Fee Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.21 39 tax:. 970.479.2452 web: wwwci.vail.co.us General Information: Al projects requiring design review must receiv€ approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Ple6e refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Re/iew cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences withln one year of the approval. of tfie Request: l.h'n Location of the Proposa,, Physical Address: p",""1 11o.,ffUu65 A tO t0ll? . " o rnn.ro*^-hi^ lf nnAfrorf s- l" '\r- .>> HOrJ __ Phone: .l D- 1t'l-f tl6 I bfL- a>L-Ya E-mair Addres", gs6,lprilg€rrl*4rtrl.,r+t- __rar,_a7o_w.22s_[_!4?:-2:_z+zl rype or Review ino ,""' I fu?gt''kh'.I co'v' For Office Use Onlv: Fee Paid: 45-D :- check No.: Application Date: 5/QD Plannec No.: A.ru* Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Mailing Address: o Zehren and Associates, Inc. 20021471.01 Develooment Standards Site Area Nine Vail Road Public Acmmmodation (PA) Zone Percent of Site Area Total Arcas Existino Landscaoe Area Landscape Area Hardscape Area Prooosed Landscaoe Area Landscape Area Hardscape 4rcq Existno Parkino Existing Indoor Proocsed Outdoor (Reolacement'l Total Parkino Reauirements Condomlnium Units Exislino Parkinq Partlng Deficiency Nine Vail Road Condominium Zoning Analysis 5t12t2003 Site Area 28,346 SiteCoveraoe Landscaoino 650/o fiYo 18,424.9 8,503.8 Area Allowable Area 1 1,3ffi 8,503.8 1,700 1,700.8 Area Allourable Area 11,160 8,503.8 273 1,700.8 Condominium Parftinc/Unit 27 't.4 Hardscaoe 20% 1,700.8 Dlfference 2,SU 1 Difference 2,656 1,428 Total Parkino 27 4 31 Tolal Paftino 37.8 31 6.8 From Land Title (M8) Fri 09 May 2003 01:0G:01 pM MDT Page 1of 8 Land Tifle Guarantee Company CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION Dare! 05-09-2003 hoperty Address: 9 VAIL ROAD VAIL, CO E165? Our Order Nunber: VC50000EE1 TIB DEYEI.0PMU\T CO, 82T MARQUETTE AVB{UE surrE 6rn MINNEAFOLE, MN 55{Y2 AEt; TJBruNK Phom: 6lll-332"150 Fs: 612-82-U28 Sem Vta Fgx tumtEJ\'Fr .From Land Title (l\il8) Fri 09 Mav 2003 01:06:01 PM MDToo Page 2 of 8 l.and Titl e Gnrarte hpary 'rrx.R@{rrcTs Drtc: 05-09-2003 Our Order Number; VC50000EE1 Property Address; 9 VAIL ROAD VAIL, CO E1657 Buyer/Borrower: TOBE DETERMINED . Seller/Owner: HOLIDAY HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. ON BEI{ALF OF ALL TTIE OWNERS If you heve eny inquiries or r€quire further assistance, pleose contact one of the numbers below: For Closlns Assistance:For Title Assistance r Vail Title DepL Sarah IL Dorman 10E S- Fronrqge Rd- W. #203 P.o. Box 357 Vail, Co 81657 Phone: 970-476-225I Faxz 970-476-4534 Email: S'dorman @ltsc. conl Need a map or directions for your upcoming closing? Check out Land Title's web site at www.ltgc.com for dirertlons to any of our 40 office locations. ENMA-IECF-IITIEE Alta Owners Policv 10-17-92 TC'TA s0.00 Form COlgtAq!TEANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! . From Land Ti t l e (lt/18)Fri 09 May 2003 01106:01 PM MDT Page 3 of 8o Chicago Tifle hsurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule A Property Address: 9 VAIL ROAD VAIL CO 81657 1. Effective Date: April 21, 2003 at 5:00 p.}W 2. Policy to b€ Issued, and Proposed Insured: 'ALTA" Owner's Policy 10-L7-92 Proposed lrsured: TOBE DETERMI}IED Our Order No. VC50000881 Cust Ref. ! 3- The estate or lnterest ln the land described or refened to In thls Commltment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4- Tttle to the estat€ or interest covered herein is at the effective date her€of vested in: HOLIDAY IroUsE coNDoMINTM ASsocIATIoN, oN BEHALF oF ALL TIIE owNERS 5. The lend referred to ln this Comrnitrnent is descrlbed as follows: COMMON AREA, TIIE HOLIDAY HOUSE, ACCORDING TO TTIE CONDOMINruM MAP RECORDED JT]LY3, 1973 IN BOOK229 AT PAGE 936 AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN TIIE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED ruLY 3' 1973 IN BooK 229 AT PAGE 935, COUNTY oF EAGLE STATE OF COI-ORADO. From Land Title (M8)Fri 09 May 2003 01:06:01 PIU MDT Page 4 of 8 ALTA COMMITMEN T SchtuIe B - Secdon 1 (Requlrements) Our Order No. VC50000EE1 The following are the requirements to be complled with: ften (a) Psyment to or for fhe accortrlt of Orc grflrtors or rnortsagors of tlre firll corsidemdon for the estate or lnterest to be insured- Item (b) Proper irstrunen{s) creatirg the eshte or lnterest to be imued nrust be executed and duly nled for recorr4 to-wit: Ifem (c) IlsJ'rnent of all tuxes, clnrges or essessrEnE levted srd assessed agdnst the subject premises wldch ere due and pryable. Item (d) Addidornl r€quirernenb, if aqz disclosed below: TIIIS COMMITMENT TS FORINFORMATION ONLY. AND NO FOLTCY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO '?,?''7'*''7.?,"*i,)'' NOTICE OF FEE CIIANGq EFFECTTVE SEPTE&IBER L, 2OQ). *I***V**:I** hlrsuant to Coloredo Revised Stqrhrtc 30-10421, 'The courty clerk and recorder shall collect a surcl|arge of $1.00 for each docrrnent received for recording or filirg in his or her office- T?re surcharge shall be in addidon to any other fees pendtted by staftte. " From Land Titl e (l\48)Fri 09 May 2003 01:06:01 PM MDT Page 5 of 8 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B - Secdon 2 (Exceptlons) Our Order No. VC500008E1 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of th€ Company: 1. Righb or claims of pardes in possession not shown by the public records. 2. EeserDenb, or clalrns of ertemenb, not shown by tlre pfillc records. 3. DiscrcPanci€s, conflicb tn bourdary llnes, shortage in area, ercmaclments, {rd err5/ fecfs wldch a con€ct survey snd irrsPection of the prcrdses would disclose and rvldch arc not shown by tlle pubtic records. 4. Any lierl or right to a lien, for servlces, labor or meterial theretofore or hercefter nrrnished, imposed by la\r and not shown by the public rccords. 5. Defecb, liers, enombrurc€s, adverse clairr or other rmt&rs, if arry, create4 first apeari4g in the prblic records or sfieching suhequent to tlre etTecfiye dqte ftspof lgt pfior to the da& Are pnroposed irsured acqdrcs of record for value tlrc €strte or intercst or moftgage tlErron covercd by tlds Conmihnent 6. Taxes or special assessments whtch are not shown as exlsflng lterB by tre prbtic records. 7. Liens for unpold water and sewer charges, if any. 8. In addilioq the ownels policy will be subJect to tlE mortgage, if any, noted ln Secdon 1 of Schedrrle B hereof. 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE TTIE,REFROM SHOUI,D TFIE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT :IHE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATEIS PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04. 1923. IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 9E. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANAI.S CONSTRUCTED BY TITE AUTTIORITY OF THE LINTTED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNTTED STATES PATM.{T RECORDED SEPTEMBER. 04, 1923, IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98. 11. TER]\{S, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF TIIE CONDOMINIIIM DECI,ARATTON FOR THE HOLIDAY HOUSE(A CONDOMINruNI, RECORDED ruLY3, 19?3 IN BOOK229ATPAGE 935. 12' RESTRICTIVE Co!-ENANTS, WHICII Do NCIT CoNTAIN A FoRFEffURE oR REVERTER CLAUSq BUT OMITTINGANY COVENANT ORRESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLO& RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS ORNATTONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO TTM EXTENT TT{AT SAID COVE.{ANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CTIAPTER 42, SECTION 3607 OF TIIE T]NITED STATES CODE OR (B) REIATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST IIANDTCAPPED PERSONS, AS CO}.{TAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JtrNUARY 09, 1963, IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE 431 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRI,MENT RECORDED AUGUST 2i1, 1964, IN BOOK 1E3 AT PAGE 239. . From Lahd Title (M8)Fri 09 May 2003 01:06:01 PM MDT Page 6 of 8 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedile B - Secfon 2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. VC50000Et1 The pollcy or policies to b€ issued will contaln exceptlons to the following rmless the sarne ere disposed of to the setisfaction of the Comparry: 13. RIGIIT OF WAY EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TEI,EPIIONE AIID TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBM.2O. 1969 IN BOOK216 AT PAGE zUI,. 14. Fj.SEMENTS, CONDnONS, COVEtr{ANTS, RESTRICIIONS, RESERVATTONS AND NOTES ON TIIE RECORDED PI.AT OF TIIE HOLIDAY HOUSE" 15. TERIVIS, COI{DITIONS AND PROVTSIONS OF EASEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 28. 1991 IN BOOK56T AT PAGD 54. NOTB SAID EASWIENT IIAS AN EXPIRATION DATts OF JLhE 9, L99?,- EJ(TENiISION IN CICNNESIION WTIII SAID EASEMENT WAS RECORDED SEPTEMBE'R L7. L992 IN BOOK589 AT PAGE49O. 16. TERMS, CONDTNONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT RECORDED TJLY 29,1997 IN BOOK 733 AT PAGE 2t9. 1:1. EXISTINGLEASF^SAND TTNANCMS. lE. ANY AND AIL LIENS AND ENCUMBERANCBS ON SUBJECT PROPERTY. . From Land Title (M8)Fri 09 Mav 2003 01106:01 PM MDT Page 7 of 8 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuent to CRS 10-11-122, notice is lrereby given that A) Th€ subject r€at pmperty rmy be located ln a sFcial taxing dishict. B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listirg eacfr taxiqg Jurisdlcfion may h obtdned from the Corurty Treasurct's authorized agent C) The lnformation regarding special dlsb:lcb and the bourdaries of such disEicts Insy be obtained ftom Ote Board of Comty Conunissioners, the Cornrty Clerk and Recorder, or tte Cornty Assessor. Note: Effecdve S€ptumber L, L997, CRS 30-10-406 requircs that all doclfircnb received tor recording or filing in lhe clerk and recorder's office sball contain e top nrargin of at least one inch urd a lef! right and bottom rnargin of et least one half of an inch T?rc cled{ and necorder nray refrrse to record or file any docunent that do€s not confonn, except tha! the reqdr€ment for t]|e top Im€in shalt not apply 0o docrtrnents using fonns on which spa.ce is provlded for recordfurg or filirg infomlAdon st the bp mergin of tlle docunent Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Reguladorrs 3-5-1, Parqrryh C of Article Vtr requires that'Byery tifle entity slnll be resporsible for all mstlers which appesr of rccord prior b tlrc time of recording whenever Are dtle entity conducb the dosing and is resporsible for recordng or filing of legat docrrnents r€sulthg ntm the transaction whlch was closed". Pmvid€d |het Larxl fifle Guarantee Cornpony conducts dE closlrE of flre irsured fansacfion [d is resporsible for recordirg t]re Iegd docrtrDf,nts fmm the tansactiorS excepion runnber 5 witl not rylEer on tlre Orrner's fide Policy and tlrc Lenders Policy when lssued. Note: Affirrnttive rnecharric's lien protecflon for the Owrrr rmy be available (tlScally by deletion of Exc€ption no. 4 of Sched e B, Section 2 of tlre Cornnltrnent ftom tlE OwnerJs Pollcy to be issued) upon complimce wi0t the followlng cordidons: A) The land describ€d in Schedule A of this corrrfhnent rrnst be a single family residence which indudes a condominirrn or townhouse rmit B) No labor or rnaterials have been frJrnished by rnechanics or material-nen for puposes of consftucfion on the land described in Sclrcdule A of this Cornrnitsnent n'ittrin tlre pmt 6 months- C) fhe Cotrymy must rccelve ur 4propriate affidavit tndermrifyrry fix Compary qairst rrrfiIed rneclnnic's ard rmterial-En's liers- D) The C-ompony must receive psyment of the sFpropriete premiuD. E) If drere hss been co[s[:ucflorl irrymverretrb or roaJor repairs urdertaken on the propefty to be purchased within six monlts prior to the Date of the Conrnitnen! the r€quirenents to obtain coverage for rnrecorded lierrs will lrrcIude disclosure of certain corrtuction lrtronmtion; finurcial information as to the seller, the bdlder sd or (he conbactor; psFnent of the apprcpriate premirrn ftrlly execr$ed Indernrfty Agreemenb safisfactory to the conrp{ry, an4 *ry additionsl rcquircnrents as may be nscessary after an exdnination of tlrc afor€said lnfonmlion by tlrc Comptrry. No coveiage wlll h given wder ury cirqnrstances for labor or rmterial for which the irsured has con8acted for or agreed to pay. Note! Pursuant to CR.S 10-11-123, nodce is lrcreby given: A) Thar fher€ is rccorded evidence tlnt a rdneral estet€ has been severe4 l€ase4 or otheffis€ conveyed fmm the surfsce €stof€ and thgt there is a substanfial lik€lihood drat a third porty holds sonn or sll intercst in oil" gos, olher minerals, or geotrerml energ/ in tlrc pmlertyi snd B) That such mineral estete msy include the dght to enter {rd use the pmpefty without the surface owner's pennlsslon Tlris notice splies to owner's policy commitrnenb containing a mineral s€versnce irsftrrnent exceptioq or exc€ptions, in Schedule B, Secton 2- Nottdng herein contained will be deerned to obligsne the comparry to piovtd€ any of tlre coverages r€ferr€d to herein urless tlrc above conditions ar€ firllv sadsn€d- Fosr DISqLG{IRE Og/OL/Oz . .From Land Title (M8)Fri 09 May 2003 01:06:01 PM MDT Page 8 of 8 JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY Fidelity National Financlal Group of Companies/Chicsgo Tltle lruurance Company and Land Tltle Gu&rontee Company July 1, 2001 We recognize ard r€srct lhe pdvecv exrctations o[ lodav's consunrcrs and the requirerDenB of anDlicable federal and stete priv-ecv laws. t\re believti drat riraldip vou awsre of liow we rse vour norr.mbfic rrcrsonal infofrmtion ('?ersonsl Inforinetiona), and to whom it is dlsclos€4 'wtlt form ttre basis for a rilafiorshhi of orftt htween us and the'publlc that we serve. This hivacy Statement provides that exflanation. We reserve thE right !o chenge this Privacy - SEternent from drne to time consistent-with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may oollect Personal lnformation about you from the following sources: + FmIn applicatiors or other fonre ve receive fiom you or your authorized nepnesentative;* From yb-r.rr Uarsactiors witrn or frcm tlre servlces hing frfonnea by, us, o'ur emlh&s, or otlren;* From 6ur internet web sltes:+ From the prbllc records rmintained by govenrnenEl entities that we either obtein direcdy fmm those enddes. or from orn'{ftilirfies or olhe-rsiard* Ftom consunrr or other reportirg agericies. Our Policies Regarding the Protection of th€ Confldentlality and Securlty of Your Personal Information We maintain ptrysical, electronic urd procedual safeeuards to rotect your Penonsl Infonmdon tom unuthodzed access or intsrsfolL We limit access td the Personol Iifonmtroir onlv t6 flrose ernDlovees who rrced such access in corutecflon wldr providrg pmducts or services to you or for other l;gitrmte tr.rsineis puposes. Our Pollcies and Pracdces Regardlng the Sharlng of Your Personal lnformatlon Wa lo"y slane your Personal ktrormdon wiflr our a:ffilier.s, such es irsu.^urce componies, agents, snd olher real estst€ setdenent seMce pmylders. We also nra5r dsclose y<iur Persornl Infonrntiori: t to qenb, brckeF or reprsentalives to provide you with services you have reqrrsted;T !o ffid$srtv conEactois or_servlce pmilders w-ho provide seMcds or perforni rna*6urg or other fr.urctiorB ori our beMf: andx to others with whom wd enter into Joint nnrtredng agreernents for producb or services tlnt we believe you n|ry nrd of inbrest In additioq we will disclose your Personel Infonnalion when vou dirEct or siye us rndssioll when \f,e are reouired by law to do so. or when we-susrct frflrdulent or criminal ac-tivities. We eEo mgv'disclose vriur Persoml Infornreflon whbn otlrercrise pnirinea W apdicable privacv laws such as, for exainple, vheh disclosure is needed fo erforc€ our rights arising 6ut of ary "gd&o""C nitrsaction or reladonilrlp wlth ybu qrle Cf UP tmporhrt rcsporBibilities of solne of our affrlletrd comperies is to record docrumnts in the public dornain Such docunents nny contain your Persornl Inforrmtioo - Rlght to Access Your Personel Informatlon and Ablltty to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletlon CJrhin states dord you lhe dght to access your PeNoneI Irfonmtion and, uder certain circunstances, !o firrl out to whom yorn' Persorfol Informition lns beei disclosed- Also. certsin statel dford vou the risht to reflrlst conectiori, arnendnent or deletion of your Personal Irtronmtion We reserre tlrc rfghg wlrer{ penninid ry lar , !o clurge a riasonable fee b cover tl|e c6sts Inctrrftd ln r€spondlng b such reql|esb. - All-rcguesb submithd to Orc Fidelity Natiornl Firnnclal Gmup of Corryanies/Chicago fitle Lsurance Company shell ti tn writirg, and detivered to-tre followirg address: PriYacf, CrrtrDllance Offi cer Fld€tit? Nsddnel Elnanclal. Inc. 4050 Calle Rfal. Sulte 220' Sorta Barbara. CA 93110 Multiple Products or Services tr we proYid€ you v'ith mor€ than one finmcial pmduct or service, you rmy receive more than one privacy notice fmm ft. We eiJ'ologize for any incorwenience tfis may cause yor.t. For& PRw.POL. CEI Planning and Environmental Commission ACTION FORM Deparfnert of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel : 970.479.2139 fa<: 97O.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail,co,us Prciect llame: parking and loading variance PEC ilumber: PEC030026 Proiect Description: Common Element - Variance to relocate four parking spaces in front setback Pardclpants: OWNER PARRISH, DOROTHY H., GORDON 05/1212003 phone: 8642 GREGORY WY LOS ANGELES CA 90035 License: APPLICANT Nine Vail Road Condo Assoc &05/1212003 Phone: 479-1788 POB 160 Vail, CO Gscalpello@attfl obal.net 81558 License: Project Addrw: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Location: Nine Vail Road tegal Description: Lot: 9-B Block SubdMsion: HOUDAY HOUSE Parcell{umbeff 210107106001 @mments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Doug Cahill Action: APPROVED Second By: George Lamb Vote: 4-2 DateofApprcyal:06/09/2003 C,onditionqr Cond: 8 (PI-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).. Cond: CON0005902 That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant must retum b the Design Review Board for final review and approval of all improvements. Cond: CON0006903 That the applicant shall revise the plans, subject to Design Review Board review and apprwal, to indicate 2 suface parking spaces and the minimum area required for a functional turnaround within the front setback, adjacent to West Meadour Drlve. Planner: Allison Ochs PEC Fee Pald: $500.00 O Rezoning 91300tr Major Subdivision 91500n Minor Subdivision 9650tr Exemption Plat 9650E Minor Amendment to an SDD 91000tr New Special Development District $6000E Major Amendment to an SDD $6000E Major Amendment to an SDD 91250 (n o euterior m d i fr cation s ) Minneaoolis. Minnesota 55402 Phone: 970-479-17888 and 612-332-1500 Ilescription ofthe Request A variance from Section 12- 7A-11 ofthe Vail Town Gode excludino oarkinq ard loadino areas from required front s€tback areas. locaton of the Proposal: Lot: Parts of Lots A, B, and C Block:_ SuMivision: Vail Villaoe 2d Filing Ptrysical Addrcss: 9 Vail Road Parcel No.! R0085 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoningr Public Accommodation l{ame(s) of Owner(s): Holidav House Condominium Association c/o Gwen Scaloello. President lrlailing Addrcss: PO Box 150. Vail Colorado Phone: 970-479-1788 (President) a - Owner(s) Signature(s) : Hame of Applicant: Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet Island Develooment. Inc. Mailing Address: P,O. Box 160. Vail, Colorado 81658 and 821 Marouette Avenue, Suite 600, $6s0 $400 $6s0 $800 $1s00 $2s0 $1300 $s00 $200 RECE IV EO MAY { 2 2m3 Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commission Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 faxi 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us General Information: All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Depaftment. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Design Review 8oard. Tlpe ofApplication and Fee: tr Conditional Use PermitD FloodplainModification tr Minor Exterior Alteration tr Major Exterior Alteration tr Development PlanE Amendment to a Develooment PlanD Zoning Code AmendmentX Variancetr Sign Variance E-mail Address: qscaloeflo@attolobaf .net and ti@brinklaw.com Fax. 970-479-7330 and 612-332-2428 For Office Use Only: FeePaid: 4pC CheckNo.; S,//eO By: Date: Pase I of 2-05112/03 afr/n TOI{NM General lnformation: This form is required for filing an appeal of a staff, Design Review Board, or planning and Environmentalcommission action/decision, A complete rorm ano associated requirements must be submitted to theCommunity Development Departnreni within ten iiol ousiness days of the disputed action/decision. Action/Decision being appealed: P(C Vtc, sro ^J ro ,*feau n, 'TAFF 4 t e-c- c etrly V4r L Ro e) €p.arte.f,)l ALL0(4 r/ il 4 e SpaC€S o.u SxiZ Appeals Form Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colondo g1657 tef : 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail:co.us J SPAeeS olF-Stzz tAJ 6tte .9e,cso *.,s Date of Action/Decision:J1t,tl a q zaa 3 Board or Staff person rendering action/decision:Pz *rt"l, ^t 4 r'nJ D €l v/e.td neuftaL Ca,nm,.ssrto! Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of landr (fO (no) If yes, are you an adjacent property owner? (yes) @ Name of Appellant(s): Mailing Address: Phone: Physical Address in Vail: Legal Description of Appeilant(s) Broperty in vair: Lot'fuffick:_subdivision:04rt- lr)ttect 2ub Et'"t6 Appellant(s) Signature(s) : (a list of if more space is required). n/2o G'u t^t )ettk Uo. fz.z_* bcur Submittal Requirements:1' On a separate sheet or s9-Oaratg sheets of paper, provide a detailed explanation of how you are an_ "aggrieved or adversely affected person,,.2' On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, speciry the precise nature or the appeal. please cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appeared.3. Provide a list of oarnesand addresses (both mailing and physieal addresses in yait) of all owners sfproperty who are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property o$rners (including ownerswhose properties are separated from the subject property by a'right-of-way, ltream,-6r otherintervening barrier).ul. Provide stamped, addressed envelopes for each property owner listed in (3.). PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM AND ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS TO: TOWN OF VAIL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657. Orl.ria.+ Nn . _ 8ttr, {6 For Office Date Received: Planner: Only: Attachment: B a Nine Vail Road Condominifms Appeal of June 9, 2003 Planning and Environmentral Commission o Decision Submittal Requlrement 7: On a separate sheet or separafe sheefs of paper, provide a detailecl explanation of how you are an "aggieved or adversely affected person." For thirty years, Holiday House Condominium Association (now d/b/a Nine Vail Road Condominiums) has shared a parking area with Holiday Inn/Chateau Vail. This parking area, designed for the use of both properties, includes four parking spaces and maneuvering space on Nine Vail Road's property with access through a driveway on Holiday Inn/Chateau Vail property. The Four Seasons' plan for redevelopment eliminates the driveway and, thus, the access to the parking area on Nine Vail Road's property. To facilitate the development of the Four Seasons, Nine Vail Road Condominium Association has agreed to relocate its four parking spaces. While four parking spaces will fit in an area adjacent to Nine Vail Road's garage entry on Meadow Drive, a variance is required to locate these spaces in a'front setback.' PEC has denied Nine Vail Road the opportunity to relocate all four currently existing parking spa@s on its property, instead requiring that two spaces be located off-site. Nine Vail Roaa conoomints Appeal of June 9, 2003 Planning and Environmential Commission o Decision Submittal Requirement 2: Qn a sepante sheet or separafe sheefs of paper, specify the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appealed. Nine Vail Road appeals the decision of the PEC to require it to relocate two parking spaces currently located on its property to an off-site location. Nine Vail Road has had actual use of the four parking spaces and the access drive since the original development. But for the Town's approval of the Four Seasons development plan, which eliminates the drive on the Chateau Vail site, Nine Vail Road would continue to have use of and access to these spaces. lt now seeks appropriate redress by requesting a variance to allow it relocate the four parking spaces to the only feasible altemative location on its property. Code sections on which the appeal is based are identified in italics, CHAPTER 17 VARIANCES 12-17-1: PURPOSEiA. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardshrps rnconslstent with the objectives of thb title as would resuft from strict or literal interyretation and enforcement, variances from ceftain regulations may be granted. A practical difficuw or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensrbns of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. The size, shape and dimensions of the Nine Vail Road site and the location of existing structures allow only 3 locations to be used for on-site parking: the current location now made inaccessible by the Four Seasons development plan, the proposed area adjacent to the garage entry on Meadow Drive and the configuration proposed on the plans approved by Council on 1"'reading, with 2 spaces on Meadow Drive and the remainder on Vail Road. Since the property is located on a corner and has two front setbacks, the requirement that no parking be placed in a front setback imposes undue hardship on the applicant in aftempting to accommodate the Four Seasons develooment. 12-17-6: CRITERIA AND F/ND/NGS: B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the foilowing findings before granting a variance:1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsr.stenf with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. No special privilege would derive from this variance. The request for the variance derives entirely from the Town's action in approving the Four Seasons development plan. Denial is inconsistent with similar use on adjacent properties. 2. That the granting of the variance wiil not be detimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Since all maneuvering would be accomplished on the property and not on Meadow Drive, there should be no impact on public health, safety or welfare. lt eliminates a curb cut and associated left turns on Vai[ Road, which were part of t-he configuration approved at 1$ reading. This configuration leaves a curb cut on Vail Road and requires left turns onto Vail Road from the parking area. This is more detrimental to public health and safety than the current shared parking area since users ofthe curent parking spaces are able to exit via the Frontage Road, an altemative no longer available under the approved configuration. Since the proposed usage is consistent with that on adjacent properties on Meadow Drive, there should be no material injury to properties in the vicinity. The total number of spaces is four. aNine Vail Road CondominlUms Appeal of June 9, 2003 Planning and Environmental Commission o Decision Given that 27 gange spaces at Nine vail Road are already accessed from Meadow Drive, the effect of 4 additional cars on Meadow Drive is negligible. 3. That the variance is wananted for one or more of the following reasons.' a. The stict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficufty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. Strict interpretation of the regulation and the action taken by the PEC June 9 require that the parking be located off-site. This is in conflict with " 12-10-6: PARKING; OFF-SITE AND JOINT FACILITIES: All parking and loading facilities required by this chapter shall be located on the same slfe as fhe use for which they are required ... Pior to permifting off-site or joint parking facilities, the council shall determine that the proposed location of the parking facilities and the prospective operation and maintenance of the facilities willfulfill the purposes of fhis chapter, will be as usab/e and convenient as parking facilities located on the site of the use. .." Parking off-site in the Four Seasons structure introduces logistics problems for both properties. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other propefties in the same zone. The irregular shape of the site and the fact that it has two front setbacks create unusual circumstances that do not apply to other properties in the same area. c. The stict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would depive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distict. Other properties in the area are currently parking in the front setback on Meadow Drive: 1o Bank, Vail Fire Station, Meadow Vail Place, Alphorn, Skaalhus. Approved 6123D3 Doug Cahill clarified that with the 3 new parking spaces required, a parking plan needs to be submitted. Doug Cahill made a motion to recommend approval to the Town Council with 1 condition: '1. That the applicant provides a detailed parking plan depicting where Alpenrose's parking spaces are on site, as well as those (3) required by the new residence, at the time of the first reading of the amending ordinance to the Vail Town Council. Rollie Kjesbo seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. 3. A request for a variance from Section '12-7A-1'1, Parking and Loading, Vail Tovrn Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail RoadAot C, Vail Village zno Filing. Applicant Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, lnc.Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs presented an overview of the staff memorandum. Gary Hartman recused himself. Allison Ochs further detailed issues staff has with landscaping and front setbacks as detailed in the staff memorandum and said that staff is recommending denial of the applicant's proposal. TJ Brink, representing the applicant, gave an overvierr of existing parking and circulation conditions and the possible alternatives, including their preferred one, using a site plan made visible to the PEC. TJ Brink also described the situation with the existing transformer boxes and how they are working with Holy Cross Energy to find a workable solution to the unsightliness and logistical problems posed by their present location. Mr. Brink then went into the criteria of the Staff memo and how he believes those criteria are in fact being met. Gwen Scalpello, 9 Vail Road, presented an argument of how the proposed surface parking fits into the context and character of the neighborhood. She then summarized what she is asking is for 4 well-landscaped surface parking spaces. She further stated that she is not asking for much in regard to the 4-Seasons proposal and that this concession is not too much to ask for considering the fast that she has a 3-story wing to her building surounded by very tall (proposed) buildings. Erickson Shirley then asked for clarification on the necessity for another curb cut. Gwen Scalpello answered the question using the site plan. Erickson Shirley asked Allison Ochs for staffs prefered alternative. Allison Ochs described staffs preferred alternative. Gwen Scalpello gave the reasons 9 Vail Road believes the logistics of staffs preferred altemative are an issue for the guest experience. TJ Brink added that those surface spots are only for overflow. Erickson Shirley then stated that people all over.town work out deals to share and swap parking J- Attachment: C o spaces thereby mitigating parking problems off-site. Approved 6/23O3 TJ Brink stated why that will not work in this instance. John Schofield asked for public input, but received none. Doug Cahill agreed with the applicants concems and gave comments on several alternatives. He stated that adequate screening and landscaping is paramount considering the work to be done with the Streetscape plan and placing only three spaces instead of the four would enable adequate landscaping and screening, as well as a sidewalk realignment. He said he does not support the proposal as wriften. Chas Bernhardt said that parking is always an issue, especially in that area (9 Vail Road). Chas stated that he does not agree with the need for the 4 surface spaces being requested and he further stated that he does not support the application as proposed. Rollie Kjesbo stated he is in favor of staffs recommendation. George Lamb concurred with the comments thus far and said he appreciates where the applicant is coming from in terms of not having any spaces in the 4 Seasons, but that it is a viable solution and should be accepted. Erickson Shirley agreed with staffs recommendation and believes that the 4 Seasons will be true to their word and provide the requested 4 spaces. John Schofield stated that staff has offered an alternative that decreases the degree of variance being requested and that the Four Seasons has also been accommodating with their offer of spaces in their facility. He further stated that he thinks the applicant should go back and look at the alternatives. He said it is great that you folks are working together to try to rEsolve the situation, but the proposal is not supported. He then asked if there was any further question or comments from the board and went on to state the choices for Gwen. Doug Cahill made the motion to approve the applicant's reguest with the conditions listed in the staff memo:1. That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant must return to the Design Review Board for final review and approval of all improvements.2. That the applicant shall revise the plans, subject to Design Review Board revienr and approval, to indicate 2 surface parking spaoes and the minimum area required for a functional tumaround within the front setback, adjacent to West Meadow Drive. Erickson Shirley asked for clarification on the conditions. George Lamb seconded. John Schofield asked Gwen Scalpello for clarification on her intentions considering the modified approval. Rollie Kjesbo asked for clarification on what is being voted upon with the conditional approval. Allison Ochs provided clarifi cation. The motion passed by a vote of 4-2, with John Schofield and Chas Bemhardt opposed. 4. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a seasonal use to accommodate an educational, recreational, and cultural use, located at 530 S. Frontage Road/Ford Park, Unplatted. 4 7.? TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Town Council Community Development Department July 1, 2003 [. ilt. An appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision to approve with conditions a request for a variance lrom Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the lront setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2- Filing. Appellent: NineVailRoadGondominiumAssociationPlanner: Allison Ochs SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is Public Accommodation zoned lot, located at I Vail Road / Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing. STANDING OF THE APPELLENT The appellant, Nine Vail Road Condominium Association, has standing to file the appealas owners of the subject property. REQUIRED ACTION The Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Planning and Environmenlal Commission's approval with conditions of the request for a variance from Section 12-7A-1 1 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front selback, located at I Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12) have or have not been meL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Developmenl, Inc., submitted an application for a variance from Seclion 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, VailTown Code, to allow for four surface parking in the front setback. Section 12-7A-11 states: Off street parking and loading shall be provided in acwrdance with chapter | 0 of this tv. kutu", Wrqa+YryW Wqffi{' ud ffi-b V. title. At least seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. No at grade or above grade surtace parking or loading area shall be located in any required front setback area. Below grade underground structurcd parking and short term guest loading and drop off shall be permitted in the required front setback subject to the approval of the planning and environmental commission and/or the design review board. BACKGROUND The Planning and Environmental Commission voted to approve (4-2, Schofield and Bernhardt opposed) the request for a variance from Section 12-7A-1 1 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, with the condition that only two parking spaces and the minimum area required for a lurn-around be located in the front setback, while the remaining two spaces be located within the parking structure of the proposed Four Seasons Resort, The staff recommendation was for denial of the variance request. Staff's recommendation of denial was based on the belief that there were alternative designs which would be less impactful to the neighborhood and to the West Meadow Drive pedestrian experience. Staff believed that a variance was warranted, but not to the degree at which it was requested. A copy of the June 9, 2003, memorandum has been attached for reference (Atlachment A). Nine Vail Road Condominium Association has filed an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's June 9, 2003, decision, which has been attached for reference (Attachment B). Minutes of the June 9,2003, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting have been attached for relerence (Attachment C). CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The staff memorandum of June 9, 2003, outlines the criteria and findings for evaluating a variance request of this nature. The Town Council must review an appeal based on lhe same criteria and findings that the Planning and Environmental Commission uses to evaluale a variance proposal. A. Consideration of Factors Reoardinq the Setback Variances: 1 . The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in lhe vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and unilormity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a granl of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other faclors and criteria as the commission deems applicable lo the proposed variance. B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followinq findinos vt. before orantino a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with lhe limitations on other properties classified in the same districl. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public heallh, safely or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvemenls in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretalion or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsislent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceplions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict inierpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Developmenl Department recommends that the Town Council upholds the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval with conditions of the request for a variance from Section 12-7 A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at Nine Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Should the Town Council choose to uphold the decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission, staff recommends the following findings: 1 . That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this Title have been met in the Planning and Environmental Commission action on this variance request. 2. That the granting ol the variance will nol constitute a granl of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classilied in the same district. 3. That the granting of the variance will not be delrimenlal to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the lollowing reasons: a. The slrict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical 3 hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not applygenerally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same districl. In addition to the findings above, staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the condilions of lhe Planning and Environmental Commission. Specifically, staff recommends the following conditions: 1. That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant must return to the Design Review Board for final review and approval of all improvemenls. 2. Thal the applicant shall revise the plans, subject to Design Review Board review and approval, to indicate 2 surface parking spaces and the minimum area required for a functional turnaround within the front setback, adjacent to West Meadow Drive. The remaining 2 spaces shall be provided in the structure of the Four Seasons Resort. ATTACHMENTS A. Planning and Environmental Commission Memorandum of June 9, 2003B. Appeals Form, received June 11, 2003C. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes of June 9, 2003 MEMORANDUM ORIGINAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department June 9, 2003 A request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, lo allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs SUMMARY The applicants, Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, fnc., have requested a variance from Section 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at I Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2no Filing. Staff is recommending denial of the request, subject to the criteria and finding, outlined in Sections Vlll and lX of this memorandum. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, lnc., have requested lhis variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow for parking in the front setback. The applicants' statement of request has been attached for reference (Attachment A). Section 12-7A-11 states: Off street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with chapter 1 0 of this title. At least seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking shallbe located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. No at grade or above grade surface parking or loading area shall be located in any requircd front setback area. Below grade underground structured parking and short term guest loading and drop off shall be permifted in the required front setback subjectto the approval of the planning and environmentalcommission and/orthe design review board. The applicalion is in response to the proposed Four Seasons Resort development. The currenl access to four surface parking spaces is located on lhe Four Seasons Resort property. As part of the development application, the current access is proposed to be removed and the parking for Nine Vail Road relocated to Wesl Meadow Drive. A vicinity map is attached for reference (Attachmenl B). As Nine Vail Road is currenlly non- conforming with regards to the number of required parking spaces, these parking spaces cannot be eliminated. Chapter 12-10, Off-street Parking and Loading, VailTown Code would require 38 parking spaces. However, lhere are currently 31 spaces provided for Nine Attachment: A 1il. tv. Vail Road. Three ol the proposed parking spaces would be located in the required 20 ft. front setback. Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, provides the following definition for a "front lot or sile line": The boundary line of a lot or site adjoining a street which provides the primary access or street address of the site, or adjoining the primary access from a street to the lot or site. As a result, Nine Vail Road, according to the Zoning Regulations, has two front property lines: adjacent to Vail Road and adjacenl to West Meadow Drive. As a result, there are two front setbacks for Nine Vail Road. Therefore, a variance is required to locate any surface parking in the area proposed. Reductions of the plans have been attached for reference (Attachment C). BACKGROUND Information regarding the original conslruction of Nine Vail Road is limited. According to the legal file with the Town of Vail Community Development Departmenl, construclion of Nine Vail Road, originally called the Holiday House, occurred in the early 1970s. Since that time, development activities on the site have been limited to minor exterior allerations. ROLES OF REVIEWNG BODIES Planninq and Environmental Commission: The PEC is responsible for evaluatinq a prooosal for: Action: The PEC is responsible for tinal approval/denial of a vaiance. The PEC is responsible for evalualing a proposal for: 1. The relalionship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformily of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public tacilities and ulilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Desiqn Review Board: Action: The DRB has NO review authorig on a variance, but must review any acnmpanying D BB application. v. Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or nol the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. Stafl: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conlorm to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Zoning Regulations 12-7A-11: PARKING AND LOADING: Af street parking and loading shall be provided in amrdance with chapter 10 of this title. At least seventy five percent (757) of the required paking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. No at grade or above grade surface parking or loading area shall be located in any required front setback area. Below grade underground structured parking and shortterm guest loading anddropoff shallbe permifted in the requhed front setback subject to the approval of the planning and environmental ammission and/or the design review board. Section 12-17 Variances (in part) 12-17-1: PURPOSE: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practicat difficulty or unnecessary physicat hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical mnditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limiktions, street locations or nnditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. 12-17-5: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION: Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a variance application, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submifted or may approve the application subject to such modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the application. A variance may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission may prescribe. 12-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT: Approval of the variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and nnstruction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two (2) years from when the approval becomes final. Streetscape Master Plan PBELIMINARY CONCEPTS The preliminary concepts for West Meadow Drive Focused on defining the existing pedestrian circulation patterns. This need to definethe pedestrian circulation system led to the development of the following preliminary mncepts. . Use different paving treatments to create in-street pedestrian paths at the roadway level. This concept builds on the idea that paft of the charm and fun of Vail is the ability to walk in the street. A street-level walk system is easier to maintain, but it was felt that the high volume of cars, buses and trucks using West Meadow Drive would create street-level pedestrian paths that would appear to create an even wider road without providing pedestrian safety. c To mnstruct sidewalks of equal width on both sides of the street. Since this is the pattern that most people are familiar with, itwould be user friendly, but would result in relatively narrow walkways and increased pedestrians walking behind parked cars. ln addition, itwas felt that this system would do little to break up the monotony of the street. It was obvious from the first design study that all of the proposed options for the streetscape improvement would need to leave the existing vehicular circulation patterns intact. This was due to the number of private homes on the street and the need to maintain adequate access for Town buses and emergency vehicles. PREFERRED STREETSCAPE PLAN The concept that received the broadest public support was to create a primary pedestrian path (1 0' - 12' wide) on one side of the street and a smaller sidewalk (5' wide) on the other. The primary pedestrian path crosses from the nofih to the south side and then back again, to avoid the head-in parking. Curb and gufter would be used to define the street which has been narrowed to the minimum width of 26'. curb-to-curb. Design Concept: Early on, it was recognized that, in Vail, people enjoy walking in the street. Because of safety concerns along West Meadow Drive, it became essential to create a separation between the pedestrians and vehicular traffic. The concept isto, in essenee, create a Wpedestrian street that is designed in such a way that it will be a more exciting pedestrian space than the existing asphalt street. The design calls fro intense planting along the "pedestrian street" to bring back the landscape character which still exists immediately adjacent to Gore Creek. This approach will also carry the landscape design theme from West Meadow Drive through to East Lionshead Circle to strengthen the connection between Lionshead and the Village. A second design concept is to add to the pedestrian experience by creating an "artwalk" along this corridor. This idea will also compliment the existing artwork located on east Lionshead Circle. The intent is to involve artists and the neighborhood residents in the final design of the "artwalk" to allow for site specific art pieces. The pedestrian streetcharacter is illustrated in Figure 7. The final plan, illustrated in tigure 6, includes a number of unique features: t All pedestrian paths be constructed with concrete unit pavers to clearly distinguish them from the roadway. The primary pedestrian path may be a different color and/or style of unit paver than the minor walkway. . Having a walkway width of 10' to 1 2' was thought to be important to allow groups of people to walk amfortably on the path (Figure 8). The width of the primary pedestrian path also makes it possible for the path to be plowed by a small truck or tractor. lf this separated pedestrian system is to be successful in keeping pedestrians out of the roadway, it must be kept clear of snow throughout the winter. c A "pedestrian priority crosswalk" has been planned near the Holiday lnn where the path crosses to the south to avoid head-in parking atthe Skaal House and the Alphorn. This raised crosswalk keeps the pedestrian path at the same level as ft crosses the street. The traffic is carried over the watkway by gently sloping ramps. Not only does this type of crosswalk give the pedestrian priority; it provides visual interest while slowing traffic. Design consideration should be given to maintenance and snow-plowing needs. t Seating is provided at regular interuals and at bus stops. Opportunities for public art should also be considered at these points. The seating must be designed with careful attention to location, views, landscaping, etc., to insure the seating will be used. . A neighborhood entry feature has been designed at the beginning of West Meadow Drivq near the fire station, to act as a psychological deterrent to unnecessary vehicular traffic. The fire station apron provides an opportunity for these cars to turn around. While this treatment witt only discourage the lost visitor from continuing west on Meadow Drive, it was felt to be a reasonable compromise between a card-activated gate or manned control gate. c The Plan calls for extensive right-of-way landscaping to soften the conidor and reflect the landscape character of nearby Gore Creek. The landscaping should be used to add as much visual interest and natural character to the sidewalk and seating areas as possible. Dense plantings are proposed to create a sense of enclosure for this pedestrian corridor. Some landscaping on private property will be necessary to 5 achieve this effect. Additionally, planters have been proposed east of the fire station to help define the roadway and reduce the amount of asphaft. VI. ZONING ANALYSIS Zoning: Public Accommodation Land Use Plan Designation: Transition Area Current Land Use: Residential Development Standard Allowed/Reouired Existino Prooosed Lot Area: 10,000 sq. ft. 28,346 sq. ft. no change Setbacks: Front (Vail Road): 20 ft. 17 tr. no change Front (W. Meadow): 20 ft. 12ft. no changeSides: 20 ft. zft. no changeRear: 20ft. 12ft. nochange Density: 16 du 27 du* no change 'This property is nonconforming with regards to use as there are no au's. Landscape Area: 8,504 sq. ft. (30%) 11,368 sq. ft. (40./") 1 1 ,160 sq. ft. (39%) Hardscape Area: 1,701 sq. ft. (20%) 1,700 sq. ft. (15ol") 1,428sq.ft.(13p/d Parking: 38 spaces 31 spaces no change VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use ZoninqNorth: Mixed Use SDD #36 w/ Public AccommodationSouth: Mixed Use Public Accommodation Fire Station General UseEast: Mixed Use SDD #6 wi Public AccommodationWesl: Mixed Use SDD #36 w/ Public Accommodation VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideration of Factors Reoardino the Setback Variances: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity- Staff believes that adding parking in the front selback will negatively impact the West Meadow Drive streetscape by allowing parking to be within 1 ft. of the front property line and 21 ft. of the edge of pavement. The proposed streetscape plan for West Meadow Drive encourages significant landscaping in the right-of-way and on private property, where necessary. As proposed, staff does not believe there to be adequate area for landscaping. While staff supports the idea of additional site walls to screen the surface parking area, the proposed walls also limit the opportunity for significant landscaping (i.e. 2. large spruce trees.) The Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the associated Design Review application at their May 21, 2003, and June 4, 2003, hearings. The Design Review Board felt that other oplions should be explored in the design of the parking area. Specifically, they felt that locating additional parking along West Meadow Drive would negatively impact the pedestrian experience. The Design Review Board expressed great concern that there would not be adequate landscape buffering area to screen the proposed surface parking. Tille 14, VailTown Code, states (in part): Particular aftention shall be given the landscape design of off-street parking lots to reduce adverse impacts upon living areas within the proposed development, upon adjacent properties, and upon public spaces with regard to noise, lights, and visual impact. At the June 4, 2003, Design Review Board hearing, the applicants presented a design which included 6 ft. site walls. The Title 14, VialTown Code, states, in part: Fences, hedges, walls, and landscaping screens shall not exceed 3 ft. in height within any required front setback area, and shall not exceed 6 ft. in height in any other portion of the site, provided that higher fences, hedges, walls, or landscaping screens may be authorized by the Administrator when necessary to screen public utility equipment. A variance would be required for any wall in excess of 3 ft. in the setback. Staff believes that there are other opportunities for the applicants which will not negatively impact the pedestrian experience along West Meadow Drive. Staff believes that lhere may be alternative designs which, while still requiring a variance, would minimize the impacts to West Meadow Drive, The degree to which reliet lrom the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specilied regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. Many of the properties along West Meadow Drive currently have parking in the front setback and in the right-of-way, including the Alphorn, and the Skaal Haus. Both of these properties are residential uses, and are zoned High Density Multiple Family zone district. In addition, the First Bank of Vail, which is zoned Public Accommodation, also has parking located within the front setback. Finally, the Vail Fire Station, zoned General Use, also has parking located within the front setback and the right-of-way. All of these properties are existing non-conforming with regards to parking space localion. These existing non-conformities have had negative impacts to the West Meadow Drive streetscape. Photos of the above-mentioned properties have been B. attached for reference (Attachment D). Staff believes that the granting of this variance would be a granl special privilege as there are olher options that exisl for this property which would not require a variance of this nature. The proposed Four Seasons Resort has excess parking capacity in the proposed slructure, which could be allocated to Nine Vail Road to replace the 4 surface parking spaces. In addition, slaff believes that there are alternalive designs which staff believes could be appropriate which would still require a variance. For example, staff believes that locating 2 parking spaces and the minimum area required for a lurnaround in lhe front setback would allow for significant landscaping which would successfully screen the parking. The remaining 2 spaces could be located within the Four Seasons parking slructure. While this option would still require a variance, staff believes that it would be the minimum deviation necessary without a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and tratfic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public salety. Staff believes that there will be no negative impact on light and air, distribution of population, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes that the elimination of the curb cut on Vail Road will positively impact the transportation and traffic facililies on Vail Road. The parking area adjacent to West Meadow Drive has been designed to accommodate a fonvard motion for exiting, thus minimizing the impacts lo West Meadow Drive. However, the proposed parking spaces will add vehicular trips to West Meadow Drive, which staff believes to be a negative impact to transportation and tratfic lacilities. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commissaon deems applicable to the proposed variance. Staff believes that other oplions exist which would minimize or eliminate the need for a variance. Specifically, the parking could be relocated within the proposed Four Seasons parking structure. The Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the proposalto relocate the parking at the May 21,2003, and June 4,2003, hearings. The Design Review Board was split in their opinion of the proposal. Some members felt that with adequate landscaping and site walls, the proposal could improve the experience along West Meadow Drive and successfully tie in with the proposed West Meadow Drive streetscape improvements. Other members slated that adding surface parking in the fronl setback would be detrimental to the Town of Vail and did not believe that there would be adequate room to screen the parking area. The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followinq findinos before orantino a variance: 1 . That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classilied in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this tille. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properlies in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends denial of the request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11, Parking and Loading, VailTown Code, to allow for parking and loading in the front setback, located at Nine Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlllof this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance, the Community Development Department recommends that the following finding be made: 1. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant ol special privilege inconsistent with the limitalions on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The strict literal interprelation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. Should the Planning and Environmenlal Commission choose to approve the variance, staff recommends the following condition: 1. That prior to application for a building permit, the applicant must relurn to the Design Review Board lor final review and approval of all improvemenls. 2. That the applicant shall revise lhe plans, subject to Design Review Board review and approval, to indicate 2 surface parking spaces and the minimum area required for a functional turnaround within the front setback, adjacent to West Meadow Drive. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Applicanl's Statemenl of Request B. Vicinity Map C. Reductions of Plans D. Pholos of Adjacent Properties E. Publication Notice 10 ZEIIREN AND ASSOCTAT[S, tNC. May 9, 2003 Allison Ochs Departrnent of Community Development Town of Vail Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Atbchment: A Re:Nine Vail Road Variance Application Allison: This letter is to describe the nature of the variance requested and the specific explanation of why the vmiance is required and why the strict or literal interpretation of the specific regulation would result in a physical hardship or practical difficulty. Additionally, it is the intent of this letter to address items a. through d. as described in the application submittal requirements. The requested variance is an exception from Section 12- 7 A-ll of the Vail Town Code excluding parking and loading from required front setback areas. Nine Vail Road Condominium Association currently has twenty-seven indoor parking spaces accessed from West Meadow Drive and four outdoor spaces accessed from the adjacent Chateau Vail site. No legal easement exists for vehicular access to these outdoor spaces rendering the parking unusable. Reasonable Engineering practice would not allow for access to the existing spaces within the current property boundaries along Vail Road. A strict or literal interpretation of the specific regulation would result in either: 1. A firrther reduction of deficient parking standards on this site through elimination of the four spaces or; 2. Allowing the four spaces to be located within a front setback along West Meadow Drive as identified by town staff. Items a. through d. of the application submittal requirements: a. The relationship of the requested varianc€ to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The requested variance would have no effect on existing or potmtial uses and structures in the vicinity because it would utilize and existing curb cut and driveway on West Meadow Drive. t RncHrrECruRE . pLANNTNC . r\TERroRs . r,ANDScApr ARO r rLcTURr PO. Box 1976 . Avon, Colorado 81620 . lgTU g4g 0257 . FAX (970) 919-10S0 . e-rnail: vriloflc@zehren.com . rv$'rv.zehren.com Z,ebren and Associates, Inc 20021471.0r Nine Vail Road Variance Criteria 5/t2/2003. b. The degree to which relief or from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofa specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of fteatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Relieffrom the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofa specified regulation would be necessary to achieve compatibility and uniftrmity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. Other sites within the vicinity that cunently allow for parking wilhin the front setback area in violation of the zoning code are the Vail Fire Station, Vail Village Inn, Alphorn Condominium, Skaal Haus Condominium, and Meadow Vail Place Condominium. c. The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportafion, trafhc, facilities, utilities, and public safety. There would be no effect on light and air, distibution ofpopulation, transportation, facilities, or utilities. The efects of the tariance on trafic and public safety would be beneficial in that an existing curb cut, driveway, and intersection would be eliminated from Vail Road; a higher speed, higher capacity thoroughfare. d. How the request complies with the adopted Town of Vail plaru:ing policies and development objectives. The requesl complies with the adopted planning polices and development objectives in that it would provide for: o Public improyements on Vail Road funded with privale money. o Increased yehicular and pedestrian safety along Vail Road. . Integration of public and pirate steetscape improvements along ll/est Meadow Drive. c Neither an increase nor decrease in compliance with adopted parking standards (required number of spaces). Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concems regarding the information presented. Additionally, if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerelv. Ilt'^ TimothyR. Losa, A.I.A. Senior Associate Zehren & Associates, Inc. Attachmenl B ct(!r cL= E*i;8 /^,v it -+-+!- - )t- - - -1 ++ ti r.. f1Itt r1 o Ep6s gs tt(uou G' o -2 riii ? lt! 7 tll g =tll N *?, I I 'It IIt tltl IJlll) ilE it la (E:=rr- I 9+ (! _J,u:th a)-?t -6E# ru //L\v E(!od,e =€$€E=- - =)Eo> .Ez z2E? Lll.rrl =i;i xiil : L Y t tl o |gutJ) o EeE:' 3l fr:tE trl;i -o rd xlJ.l /^v T'(ooM =(E osb 2 tlllll I -.- 'T)\4 n ll q) (€ (Jatt EGoUe =EF-G Es) +lo>? 2 Fii ?lr x IJJ 1^\v z tlt M A tll N -; ! 6 o ll tu(t(,q, o Ep ES F- H!! ail (\t E oo-ctIvtT'tr(\t /^v tll M tlt N T' G'oe, G o? 2 I / ^4 tt+ o v _ o a!(Jtt) -o ruoE,E =EF-(EEt') ='3o>? z z* oa- G'(Jta E(dr /^,v tll Nl= tlJ I I I \ I I \ t \ I I l?; \ ttl K/ ,.t..,t.( )..' T I , __4, oN? 'i' Attachment: D p0004685jp9 (1536x'1024x24b jpeg) , . ri i,l:i.- j \Er+ oo p000,1690jp9 ( 1536x 1 024x24b jpeg) p0004691jp9 { 1536x1024x24b jpeg) p0004692jp9 ( 1536x 1 024x24b jpeg) p0004694.ip9 (1 536x1024x24b jpeg) p0004695Jp9 (1 536x1024x24b laF-g]- O Afiachment: E I Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Village Inn Place - Phase Itr Village Inn Place - Phase IVAssn Condominium Assn Condominium Assn P O Box 19157 100 E Meadow Dr 100 E Meadow Dr Avon, CO 81620 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 DAB Investment Inc d/b/a Holiday Inn Chateau Vail Moellentine Land Co LLC p o Box 11g3g 461 Fifth Street vail Fire Protection District Denver, Co 80211-0939 New york. Ny 10017 vail' co 81657 Zyman, Sylvia Rebeca c/o Johnson, Brown & Speigel Gary A. Syman - Azita Raji Family Vail Village Inn Plaza Attn: Brenda Brown Trust Condominium Assn 500 Bishop St A5 27 windward Rd 143 E Meadows Dr Arlanra, GA 3031g Belvedere' cA94920 vail. co g1657 Jim Lamont Village Inn Place - Phase V Vail Village HOA Condominium Assn p O Box 73 100 E Meadow Dr Rectiff. CO 81649 Vail. CO 81657 BS condominium Assn Gail M' & Stephen R' Rineberg BeaverRoad Inc 10403 W Colfax Ave 7475 Ganey Ranch Rd 9E Lakewood, co 802rs scottsdale, Azsszsl ;i"rX%*:i.|"& Rental Mgmt Vail. CO 81657 WIP 502 Edna N. & Claus W. Frickeiff":ffiil3ii,' idi%Tffi/la'L,-u il,::6ii'1,31-1s57 Villa Cortina Condominium Assn p O Box 1012 Sonnenalp Properties Inc Vail Corp Vait, CO 81658 20 Vail Rd P O Box 7 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81658 Meadow Vail Place Condominium Assn 44 W Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Daymer Corp NV 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Vail 108 Ltd c/o Westar Bank Admin Center P O Box 1210 Gypsum, CO 81637 Nico Vail Inc Claggett/Rey Gallery LLC Masters Gallery At Vail LLC c/o SliferMgmt 100 E Meadow Dr 70 S potomac St 143 E Meadow Dr Ste 360 Vail, CO 81657 Aurora. CO 80012 Vail, CO 81657 Osakis LLC Hanlon Family Partnership Red Sands Corp c/o Watson & Co Inc 385 Gore Creek Dr c/o Vail Home Rentals Inc 10670 E Bethany Dr Bldg 4 Vail, CO 81657 143 E Meadow Dr Ste 397 Aurora, CO 80014 Vail. CO 81657 Robqrt M. Euwer & Barbara D. Euwer Revocable Trust 7528EGallup St Littleton, CO 80120 Maureen T. O Dea 16450 W Sunset Blvd 302 Pacific Palisades, CA 9027 2 Linda C. Dickinson Qualified Personal Residence Trust 9200 HollyoakDr Bethesda, MD 20814 David G. & Cathy L. Crane c/o D.G. Crane 2485 Broadway San Francisco. CA 94115 Thomas F. Sheridan, Vincent D. Walsh 1808 Swann St NW Washington, DC 20009 Ponch Inc - Trio Inc c/o Jefferson P Knoght PA 777 Bricknell Ave #1070 Miami, FL33131 Eugene, Jr & Sue B. Mercy 1111 Park Ave New York, NY 10128 Vail44 Corp 44 Meadow Dr 44 Vail, CO 81657 Meadow Place Inc c/o Invicta America Attn: Suzette P O Box 551600 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33355 Pericles Realty Inc 44 W Meadow Dr Vail. CO 81657 Obering Irrevocable Trust 5251 DTC Parkway 425 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 William A. & Ronnie N. Potter 1130 Park Ave New York, NY 10128 WilliamW. Graham 11661 San Vincente Blvd 401 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Charlene Caruso Revocable Living Trust 2428 N 12th Ct Ft Lauderdale,FL33304 Judith & Joel Baker 20 Dolma Rd Scarsdale, NY 10583 James W. & Ellen V. Pinkard 3440 Youngfield St Ste 351 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Pericles Realty Inc c/o Otto Peterson & Post -P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 Spraddle Creek Properties Inc. c/o James B. Newman 150 Govemment St Ste 2000 Mobile, N-36602 Hilda O. Fanill Avila Attn: B. Brandon Ansbacher Honse Jennet St George Town Grand Cayman Cayman Islands BWI David William Hanna Trustee c/o Hanna Capital Management, Inc 620 Newport Center Dr Ste 500 Newport Beach, CA92660 -Luis P. & Husuette D. Bustamante c/o Vail Realty & Rental Mgmt 302 Hanson Ranch Rd Vail, CO 81657 Margaret T. Fuller 5123 S Perry Cir Littleton. CO 80123 RlExempt Corp c/o Frederick S. Otto P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 JAF Industrial Dev P O Box 6688 Somerset, NJ 08875-6688 Seviher Corp c/o Burke Mgmt P O Box 2631 Vail, CO 81658 William & Ann F. I-oper 22 W Meadow Dr360 Vail. CO 81657 Michael S. & kis Smith 2 Sedwick Dr Englewood, CO 80110 Richard T Liebhaber and Kirsten E Liebhaber Personal Res. Trust P O Box 8210 Mcl.ean, YA22106-8210 Meek FamilyTrust John F. & Jerris P. Ferguson, Terry O. Meek 5326 Clayhill Dr Springfield, MO 65804 575M LLC 18 Springfield Ln Sarasota Springs, NY 12866 i Vail Sundial LP c/o Russell Standard P O Box 479 Bridgeville, PA 15017 Vail Gateway LLC 3 World Financial Center 12rh FL New York, t{Y 10285-1200 Miami, Fl 33131 Q"n,r" River Acquisition Corp q c/o Manuel Martinez ww ' Leo Palmas consulting Group 2775 Iris Ave 905 Bricknell Bay Dr ste 230 Boulder, co 80304 Miami, FL 33131 Whitebay Marketing Ltd c/o George D. Perlman Holland & Timberline Commercial Holdings Knight LLC 701 Bricknell Ave Ste 3000 12 Vail Rd 600 Vail PBKLLC 392 Mill Creek Cir Vail. CO 81657 GGGLLC P O Box 5963 Vail, CO 81658 Vail, CO 81657 KilmurLLC P O Box 5963 Vail, CO 81658 James R. & Karen W. Johnson 19 Churchill Rd Vail Gateway Plaza Vail Village Inn Inc piusburgh, pA rs23s it"It's$,::r.t lo"r.|6T*;t", Diane Gamel Lighthall Patricia Ann Gabriel 5zg3w oberlin Dr Meacow unve ventures lnc Denver, co 8023s ni;i::;trtr; - ;f"3::,"$ir 76s3-0268 Karin Wagler Revocable Inter Claus W. Fricke Revocable Trust Vivos Trust Staufer Commercial LLC Edna N. Fricke Revocable Trust Karin Wagner Trustee 100 E Meadow Dr 3l P O Box 1557 405 Bontona Ave Vail. CO 81657 Eagle, CO 81631-1557 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301 Sylvan M. & Frances Tobin ,t-_ rr' Marvin J. & Karole A. Frank 101 cheswold Ln 5-D Daymer Corp NV Haverrord, pA 1e04r l,*,tliltt';-e Rd 26 31?:"|":f;Trt'- Emest III & Lisa Jane Scheller .1^-^, ,\ r^-^- i*,-1^^ Guiseppe & Mercedes Cecchi 751 BennerRd Carol G. Jones trustee Ailenrown,pA r8r04 a:ffi:H8..;; ffifff?f :f't,^ William P. & Lynda B. Johnson Mchael P. & Patricia J. Glinsky Vail Village Inn Associates375lnca Parkway 3200 Cheny Creek S Dr Ste 230 Boulder, co 803b3 Denver, co 8020e ffi"J::lil#te & co Denver, CO 80206 Silvia Ito deZaragoza Cary J. & Dorothy Fanell Cordes 302 WI Inc P O Box 220349 28 Trentino Rd, Turranurra 2074 c/o Fred Otto _ Otto peterson & post El Paso, T)(799l3 NSW Australia p O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 Barbara Weinstein 78 Jdyce Rd Plainview, NY 11803 Richard T. Uebhaber P O Box 8210 Mclean, VA22I06-82I0 Kirk D. Huffard 8 MaherAve Greenwich, CT 06830-5617 Patricia Ann Gabriel I E Ridgewood Ave' Paramus, NJ 07653 Staufer Commercial LLC 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Colando CO Priv Antonio Chedraui SA{ Col Encinal 91180 Xalapa Veracruz Mexico Barbara & Charles Dillman 18316 Mainsail Pointe Cornelius, NC 28031 Red Sands Corp cio Vail Home Rentals Inc 143 E Meadow Dr Ste 397 Vail, CO 81657 Charles M. Harmon, Jr. - Traditions LP I1380 Long Meadow Dr W Palm Beach, H-33414 Bede Ltd c/o Bustamante, Luis Pablo Priv. San Isadro 44 Col. Reform Social, Del Mguel 11650 Mexico DF A.J. Propeny Trust c/o Dreyer Edmonds & Assoc. 355 S Grand Ave Sre 4150 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3103 4725Ltd 80 W 78th St Ste 133 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Daymer Corp NV 100 E Meadow Dr Vai, CO 81657 Paul A. & Penelope N. Leseur Somerset Bridge, Sandys SBBX P O Box SB90 Bermuda Town of Vail c/o Finance Dept 75 S Frontage Rd Vail, CO 81657 Alexander Family Trust Judy Lynne Alexander Trustee 2121 N Frontage Rd W Ste 254 Vail, CO 81657 S.C. Geroca 100 E Meadow Dr 101 Vail, CO 81657 Kinney L. Johnson 1100 Homsilver Cir Vail, CO 81657 Raymond J & Mealnie Rutter Family UDT Raymond J Rutter Trustee 760 Via Lido Nord Newport Beach, CA92663 Pedro A. & Adelaida Petunia Ramirez Cond. Caparra Classic Ph-2 105 Ortegon Ave Guaynabo PR 00966 Michael l.Zaremba 6200 Plymouth Ct Downers Grove, IL 60516 OliverM. & DianaL. Kearney 7565 Spanish Bay Dr I-as Vegas, hIV 89113 Chris J. & Jennifer A. Anderson 103 Anemone Dr Boulder. CO 80302 John & Rebecca Moore P O Box 728 Del Mar, CA92O24-0728 James E. & Jeanne Gustafson P O Box 5010 Norwalk, CT 06856 Floyd L. & Elaine E. English 571 Millbrook Dr Downers Grove. IL 60516 Lario Inc c/o Vail Village Inn 100 E Meadow Dr Vail, CO 81657 Lublan S.A. c/o Banco Intemational SA 437 Madison Ave lTth Fl New York,I{Y 10022 Enchanted Mesa Exempt Corp c/o Frederick S. Otto P O Box 3149 Vail, CO 81658 Douglas Deane Hall, Jr. 2000 E 12th Avenue Box 4 Denver. CO 80206 Gerardo Sclhroeder Gonzalez - DE Patripia Inzunza Schroeder A.J, Property Trust Firstbank of Vail c/o Dreyer Edmonds & Assoc 17 Vail Rd 355 S Grand Ave Ste 4150 91 TunapunaLn Coronado, CA 92118 I.os Angeles, CA 90071-3103 Rogerl. Reisher Jeff Moellentine z+oocnerrycreeksDr*r40s i*tjT,:lil;S.Denrrcr, CO 80209-3258 Vait. CO 81657 Chuck Lipcon One Biscryre Tower Suite 248t) Miarni, FL33131 Vail, CO 81657 Chades Upcon 430 N Marshra Dr Key Biscayne,FL33L49 U rrEM'tl,$i'119J;3H- PR.PEIY ' NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Vail Town Code on June 9, 2003, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: . A request for a variance from Section 12-7A-11 , Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allow l_for parking and loading in the front setback, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot C, Vail Village 2nd Filing.v fi Applicant: Nine Vail Road Condominium Association and Nicolet lsland Development, Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a seasonal use to accommodate an educational, recrealional, and cultural use, located at 530 S. Frontage Road/Ford Park, Unplatted. Applicant: Town of Vail/AlPP, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs A request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a private outdoor recreational facility, located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1"r Filing. Applicant VailResortsPlanner: Bill Gibson A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to amend the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Town of Vail, represented by Greg HallPlanner: Warren Campbell The applications and information about these proposals are available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department office, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation held in the Town of Vail Community Development Department office and the site visits that precede the public hearing. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for additional information. This notice published in the Vail Daily on May 23, 2003. 6u*1t''f:7,o*?ref o= Department of Community Development 75 South Frcntage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2 138 FHX 970-479-2452 www.ci.vail.co.us fu topr September 17,2001 Annette Mackie 100 Lamed Road Summitt, New Jersey 07901 Dear Annette. It was a pleasure meeting with you and Gwen Scalpello the other day regarding the possibilrty of creating lock-off accommodation units at the Nine Vail Road Condominiums. The purpose of my letter is to provide you with written conformation of the zoning mafters we discussed. As you will recall, your ability to construct lock-off accommodation units is regulated by the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. According to the information contained in the Town of Vail property files, the Nine Vail Road Condominium property is considered to be a legally established non-confonning site and structure. The designation ofa non:conforming site and stnrchre arises out ofthe fact that the condominirrm building contains more dwelling units and too few parking than is otherwise allowed by the Town's current zoning regulations. To add additions accommodation units would further exacerbate the non-confomrity and this is not permitted by our regulations without the granting ofa variance. Variances applications for non-conforming sites and structures are reviewcd by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Cornmission. Should you choose to pursue a variance please contact me as I am happy to discuss such an application in greater detail with you. I can be reached most easily by telephone at 970- 479-2145, or by e-mail at snrther(alci.vail.co.us. I am hopeful this letter confimrs our discussion. Should you have any questions or concerns do not hesitate to give me a call or drop me a line. Sincerelv. George Ruther, AICP ChiefofPlanning Town of Vail {p r""r"uo r^ro TOWN Gr'jVfrII-r 75 S.FRONTAGEROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF CO ITYDEVELOPMENT NOTE: OhINER HOIJTDAY HOUSE ASSOCATION 9 VAIL RD VAIL CO. 8155 7 CON:TRJACTOR TRE, INC. 11.890 WEST 35TII AVENUE IIIHEATRIDGE, CO enn?? License : 261-8 APPLICANT TRE, INC. ]-].990 ViIEST 35TH AVENUE WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 Desciption: REPLACE ALL WINDOWS Job Address.: Location......: Parcel No....: Project No...: Occupancy: Type Construction: Type Occupancy: Valuation: Fircplace Information: Restricted: 9 VAIL RD VAIL ENTIRE BLDG 210107106000 Rl Multi-Family II-FR ?? $82.763.00 Add Sq Ft: # of Gas Log: 0 arnount o date FtrE SUMMARY Building-> Plan Check-> lnwstigation-> will call-> Restuarant Plan Review-> DRB Fcc---> Req!'alion Fcc--_-> Clean-up Deposit_-_> TOTAL FEES--_---> s0. o0 9100.00 90.00 s250. oo Total Calculaled Fees-> Additional Fe€s--> 'l otd Permit Fce---> Palments.----> BALANCE DT'E_----> 91 ,433 . 75 $8O. O0 $1, s13 . 75 $0.00 9555.00 s425 .75 $3-oo Approvals:Ii6m: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENII TO/20/20OO JRM Action: AP APPR WITH CONDITIONS Itsem: 05400 PIJAIINIIIG DEP.ARTMEIiIII 1-0/20/2A00 ao Action: AP Item: 05600 FIRE DBPARTMEMT Item: 05500 PIIBLIC WORKS See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. r ') Lr * Br 0c-.\ c, L\ou^rs\Y/ \bL&"7 '*.^,-^--o THIS PERMIT MUsr BE PosrED oN JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES (J C-z__-..r_..r. \ ADDiALT MF BLIILD PERM]T "'::;t .ff"'.:;q%-t' ,hmDev up Depgsit Refunci/ed 7k- # of Gas Appliarces: 0 Permit #: 800-0296 Status.....: ISSUED Applied-..: 10/2012000 Issued -.,: l0l3l/2000 Expires...: 04129/2001 1,0/20/200A Phone: 419-71,00 t0/20/2000 Phone: 303-239-S155 # of lvood Pellet: 0 TRTea -03of proved DECLARATIONS I b€reby acloowledge that I have read this application, filled out in firll the information requirod, completed an accurate plot plan" and state that all tre infomration as required is correst. I agree to comply with the information and ptot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this sfiucture according to the tovms zoning and subdivision codes, desip rwiew approved" Unifqm Building Code ard other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FC'R INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY.FOTIR HOTru IN ADV OUR oFFIcE mOM 8:00 AM - 5 PM. Sqtd Cl€crbup D€posit To: TRE INC ORFORHMSELFAND OWNE PAGE 2 *** * * **** * * **** r. ** * *******t' 'fi ***,* *********** * * * ***** **t*** 1.* * +** **** * ** *** * **** * ** *** * * + +*+ *+ * {. * * ** * ***** CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit#: 800-0296 asof10-31-2000 Starus: ISSUED *++** **** ******** *x***** * ***{' ****** * ***** *** ** * * * * * **:t * ** * * + i.+ * +*+ * * * * * * * * * * ** * t * * * ** * ** * * * * * ** +* * * * * * * * Permit Twe: ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT Applied: 1012012000 Applicant: TRE. INC Issued: 10/31/2000303-239-8156 ToExpire: 04/29/2001 Job Ad&ess: 9 VAIL RD VAIL Location: ENTIRE BLDG ParcelNo: 210107106000 Description: REPI,ACE AI,L WINDOWS Conditions: Cond: L2 FIEr_,D TNSPECTTONS ARE REQUTRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE. Ent.ry: t0/20/2O00 By: JRM Action: CR SAFETY GI..AZING PEQUIRED AS PER SECTION 2405 IJBC Cond: 14 AT,T, PENETRAT]ONS IN WALLS,CEILINGS,AND ELOORS TO BE SEAI,ED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond:16 SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQU]RED IN ALL BMROOMS AND EVERY STORY AS PER SEC.310.5.1 OF THE 1997 UBC. Cond: 1 FIRE DEPARTMEIWP ApPROVAL rS REQUIRED BEFORE A]\ry WORK CArr BE STARTED. Cond: CON00A4429 EGRESS WIIIDOWS ARE REQUIRED rO I,IEET 1997 tiBC SECTTON 3L0.4 Cond: CON0004430 SAFETY GLAZrrirG AS REQUIRED PER UBC SECTTON 2405 Cond: CON000443L LIGHT AND VENTILATION REQUIF€D AS FER 1997 IJBC SECTION 1203 APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project #: ?rroo,ota?Building Permit #: 97O- 479-2t49 (Inspections) 116o ' c')L( 75 S. Frontage Rd.Vail, Colorado 81657 Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical. etc.! Conhd As*ssrc Offrce at 97O-328-8640 orvisit for Parcel # Parcel #?lo10t /06m0 robName, fhWJ / e? robAddress: ? ttt/ PJ, //,il &) s/[s7 Legal Description Lot:I I Block:Filing:subdivision: t/tll Ulil* til Owners Name: rl I"/t ll II|huy&,ulfftte llw,Address: q Ur;l ru Phone: 4vlJ lrrla Architect/Designer:Address:Phone: Engineer:Address:Phone: Deta{edfescrrpFion pf work: I MtYilhtt kjftttptwut< a )OO' O21b WorkClass: New( ) Addition( ) Remodel }(J Repair( ) Demo( ) Other( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both (5J Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes ( ) No ( ) Type of Bldg.: single-family ( ) Two-family ( ) Mutti-famiiy ft) commerciat ( ) Restaurant ( ) fther ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: %No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/Tvpe of Fireplaces Existinq: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Logs ( ) wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burninq ( Noffype of Fireplaces Pro@!ed: Gas Appliances ( ) Gas Loos ( ) Wood/Pellet ( ) Wood Burninq (NOT ALLOWED) Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No ( )Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No ( ) COMPLETE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT (Labor & Materiats) /'t--, BUTLDTNG: $ y2,71r3.-ELECTRICAL: $OTHER: $ PLUMBING: $MECHANICAL: $rorAL:s fl .7L3 -REFUND CLEANUP DEPOSIT TO: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Town of Vail Req, No.:Contact and Pfpne #'s: Ofu. n3Qn-8/56 3a3-855-34 *r.**********************i**+***********FOR OFFICE ONLY*'r*L**r.**** )s************** F :/everyone/forms/bldgperm RECD oCT 18 2000 3265 Soulh Wadsworlh Blvd,, Latewood, C0 80227 Phonc 984.20?3 Far (303) 984'1912 Anendon: Company: From: Date:,/O'26.4A FACSIMILE Message: der'tra hrz A Ptrc Numbcr of pagcs including thi$ pagc:4a lf this facsimile did not ransmit succossfully,'plcase call 303-984'2m3' ?&t"tes conftdcn|i|to|ic!:T.t!t,ocu]r|rnlollcco.rw|yiotfihtor.eorr|rrccrfrdarrirllnfnn|ico.*hishitb|'u,Fi|ilc|r{t.lllci|r'on|lrttonlr ,nrrno.d lor ]tu usc of dr inrcndcd ,.ipii*h,i,iuor* lf yor rn ncr raa'inrridrJ *ir,onr" you uuh:itby.rrotifird th r|rt ditclorufr' idprrng,. 6'11nb'on or rac raf inf or-t"*ilffi;"t*';,t"-;rrnu * Uir iJcrcolc4 iiio-it6oo t*cOr. ig iircl dclivcry to th! mc1d'd Irc,DEnr nlnG! Oott ir tldcllt Ptgnlb!.!d. lf ,ca hrw nccivcC thil lu l" "ilPk;illt $ inncdb;l' b' ElcPl|dtr l0 rmnlc fof tnE ,Gtum ol lha onFml doc$mcrl(t, to u3. Lgl t6/ 26idl L'2i b4 3b39841t 72 RENEhJAL DEN PAGE g2 SPECIf ICA]ION5 ANO ITCtINICAL MANUAL tntcrconncction ofharacteristic; Rcnml by AndcrrrF window prcduca arc dcsigncd end buik aording to a cffcfulty ddined inttrconnccdon of charecsisrics. Eac.h dcrncnt i'l .nall',cd nnd bnlenccd ro crtarc thc most cffcctivc totd Prcduc. Extcnciw tcating is pcrfomrcd to rnatrt sua cvcry window wc insall mccre or occods indusuy cundrrds ud our onomcrd cryectrtiom' Ths cccrion of thc srerrud discurscs in cesy to undcrctrnd tcrms dr rcttrlicrl erpccu rnd bcncftts of drc meterids usod h R'ncw-rl b,' Andcncno windmr' Isr.rcttiectiou of Cbtrac uti ttltt 4,- ReY. 05^)9 Confidemial Tedrnical oau 8-3