HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5D LOT M O VAIL PLAZA HOTEL 1999 MAJOR AMENDMENT REQUEST REVISED PART 2 LEGALVail Plaza Hotel Zefuen and Associates. Inc.961070.00 rclF,{/s
Circulation (continued)
Every effort will be made to encourage properfy owners within the district to upgrade their properties
especially with regard to surface paving materials.
Buildine Entrance
The porte-cochere and hotel entry on Vail Road has been reconfigured to address the commissioner's
comments regarding the pedestrian experience and sense of entry to the hotel. The sidewalk configuration
at the north side of the site adjacent to the Gateway has been revised and incorporated into the design of
the entry area.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments regarding the information presented
or any additional materials that you may need in writing your report.
Sincerely,
It- |
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
:J
i
ii
!t
')l
Oo'x6i
-c'ON|Jh
l!!>U
r 3ti!Y 316z
=
IilrxEili
tf)
o'E
(Jav1
oo
(/)
€).t-J
O
I
G
Nfg
Lr--
=rg
G'
IJJ
E
q.)
.ho
LL
?
z
3
Etl
6
o)
IJ.I
(!
o)bo
nt
A_ cJ
>F
@
.9trr(uY(n '-€iN6
L
//L\.3
Oo'
E$
€siUb.*
sd
fral1i
n lii;
@
O
J_
GN
_trL
G
--t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:l !P X
-q;3 'E
=16 5>t oJt-
-.1 Lu
(d
N
o-
(g
|lI
g?.:;
>F
(!
q)
lrt
N
u)
g=
=-H
-o-.E
;Pt€0-5
b
I
Oo,x6
o ..1Ub
sefii
=EllixElli
ta
.9
rs
@
tJJ
@
=o
"=
m
/'\v
@J-J
O
ru
N
-Go=
6
|-
OJ
tJ.t
v)
;i
()
LIJ
o
ttthF,FFFFir t: tl
+++
t
i!
I
t
i!ar
+
OJ
4J
6)
IIJ
z
tl
(li
Oo'
t!o
Ets
o ..Y>rJ
r ;liia. f li!
=Ellix?E!E
.t,
.9
U
€)(n
bo
.E
=E
t----=-:
@P
O-tr
6Nrg
IJ-
6
Y(!
U
c
{(!t>-iI=
I',Yo\-,r
.E
o
lrl
-
ct)
.9'o(n(!
EE:
au
EY>ool >._Frr.r 5
{Jz
ttttL$$*$ $
t
?i5
i.F
5F
ta
o
G
@
l.rJ b
b
L-r-l
boItra
E
{^\v
@
OE
r StiisSldr
=$iliN?i!;
6
N
o)
|IJ
tt,
.F
oE
vlq)
=
EJ
clg
IJ,J
E
z
e
iLi
Oor
-l Oilior
EX
>o
=-';.'li
r $:l;
=elllN t llr
thg
.g
Uo@
@
@
E
"=_'-1
(..\v
@
o
A
fg
N
16
Lr-
Fg
-
€(J(E l->(ooJ>_lt-
f,v
tt)
x9,E5
fi.q(l)v
4
Ell
$frEE'lr 'lt
tl
Iltljir ir i! !! !!99+++
+
sll
r
+
E
tl
r
++eo* *E*l! 'lr lr 1lr rrr
(! r->(!o>
'J-J ;€oFf]6-z
(t(!
(uE
|rJi
HU|rJ
=d3Lno;4JE
@-'
r^v
@.t--Jo-r
go'dEFNfi6:€
o->o
=G
f ;li:
N'fffiiiattt''ffi el
J---:r=-ru(N-/
^a\-1,--/ |\J
€_
ll
0)
cE$NiFrs -ix-{3lJ---
r;lii
s=Jdr
=!ilrx?lii
o
=l_
V,
=g
=E
€)J
/'L$
@
o
I
rs
)
(
)
t
rI
--'1
I
-
I
I
I
I
)
)
\)\(
\ --
l-.(
I| --
II
r
In'tiitil
| .--
\
tt-' tt
-
\_ :".
:
T
U
I
I
E
I:_
1
I
-
:_
:_
i
L
IT!
--l
-L
.i
_i_
n-i-
+
T
'A
Lr
t)Lr
ti
L.
T
,
0
' --l
.il
I--1
I
-)'-l
Ilr.J
I
l ls I .ll 3l: l ill! I i | :ll : l: I :ll I
+l il --ll i l:l 1ll lli lrll;1.'1.
t
F
JI
5
J
I
@
ta
eb
<3 :-.2.)? uf
€)
@
(..\v
Oo6E$NiFiru_-{
o_>o
fi;iii
4 =lE.
=Eili,I e ll!
@
OT
6
E|
il iill0$0iili il
Illd
d
{
g
:
J
:
't!
a
.i.
o
oN3
?O-
\94J
f,v
u
o
L Os'6E$NiFirs .{
tus5
#r\ii
tr l;iix?lli
6
n n(nna-'rdna1 r.\r..\v vlv \r' v \r'
OOTOOOOOOO
ooloooPooo
o ooooCIoooo
n A tr n..rl,r r. .r r'v t|/ \,, \J vtv \_, \_/ (_,
tloooqooo0ooo
ooodooo0oootl
F. T llE
l:- tl
,
TIo
Il$
L:
:
W
€)
r) '-
i6
€,
qr'a
(..,\v
Oorx6
EXUb5
to
F il!;
=$ilixr i il!
@
O
I
6
N
cd
LI-
6
l-i(\
\V
-{lsi
fi]1
ffil
/
a
,j
)
I
I
I
ll nsl I'
wi$lil_J tl
j" ei
^6o''z,o lfr
I
mn
't
I
)
I
I
-)
:1_:mtr___-;=-+ffi+:
>x--L:---t-'i{:'-
K
$
ts
#.."'"'..q. r''''q\
/^\^Avo o o v o
O '1 f', C'l r-) ,'l
a1 ar ._rE -\ ._\ .i\,/v\.,t(-,veoooooo
^c b o ^0!J oo (J
l..w,;ffi
F:I
60
tl=lr0
I
ffiw
E.E
P_H
H=qF-t
bE
r'F
o
b
u-j
€) .qJ
(,\v
a)-E)o
f
Oo'
6dE$NFIrs_.+
n->o
G
E ilii
TEili
- a !rlN?ii;
t{
I
I
r)
I
I
I
I
W,,
W
ffiW
I_l
€)6)
-3 ;
o;
€)dJ
//v
a)
o
IE:i-
dES\w : -NFFirs .{x.-{tLr---
6
r;li:
d 3l6t
=EiiiN?l!:
N
rEl
F=4
t
.."2>
." t\)
oLJ- ?
O:-
€)sJ
(^,v
a)
O
I
Oo\6EENI€sidii
fl-2"
G
r ;tiie 3td?
=Eilrr.r ? i!i
\(t\)
^'-i-'-
-'t
il
@H, Iffilli.il l
"$ffi;wi
\
t1
ffi
E|
o
Ll- ?
€)i
@.i
r..,v
a)-E
O
I
rdE$N€FfdYT
^ S6
G
frAii.
=Eiil
..-
^ E!F
i'-r ? t ii
N//--::>,
..t \
.x
@b -@ii(u:Ja
(.^\v
@
oT'
Oo6E$
N.t € :i6Yi
-=
ItLsd
6
Etlii
=Eili-- a !rEx?ili
N|
-rJ
I tlu I
\ \ l,/ \l/
l-1'ry'
€
n
D
€
€=F\
- r\/-
rs
CI=J
oiA-9
Mn
@
o
I
Oo'dEEN€s;*UIrv _.6
n-->o
G
r:q;i
'$fr!;ii
t-rli
;l.(rIl
,(Tl
f-htllIU
I
^l
rg
g
@_€Eq
@ +3;T stir+ !E..
h/a F f,Ee - =-'
m
//a'v
@
o5Fi
Oo,
6dEE
NFT6"',.{
nI2v
r;tii
e=,8!
- E ld^*erll
Nzii;
G
I
I
I
I
lit
I
IriI:
t;
i,!
ta
lii
li
ril
'f
o
a
E'.
-o tl&.'-
.9;
ii q,
!u
5
Ocr
CEENEF6'".{
tusd
r;li:
s=ld3
-=
$ ili
r...r ? il!
N
.soE
bo
.=
=CIo
ltta'v
a)H
O
I
6
4
,r,
A
I:ii\"t
I
I
), t
,' i
/-z' ?lt
\,.\(
s{4'{tF
*-n
$-7,,)
,lt
l/
i\
t1
li
F
)r;^,t
Oo,
E5
O6r
(, L
i:.)
g Eiil
=
Eili
x?lii
e
_qL
o@G
GL
LJ
:rs
g
CIu
oU
fl^v
@
o
Id5
6
N6
L-r-
6
re
&
irffffg
!
-ftl
IYGcttIE,
frrIW
4
V
-;t---litil
,-i,/n(:-.--{I\U
miul^ i,/a(-l.sr
I
o
eVADctt''
Hlmff' P'H'lt
(5rtyr.rxra'/'
p1*nr+/
@) @ts{
srcruc r{/
5#r9l7rll'lil V||LfiiAt{dq-
14DD.oo
Aareili A>:ccrrrlM@,nqqSAri f-'frd"
U
e4E' t2''11't|r
,6'.?,\y+'/
5hr-e-n'Hr
^fr\ /4.1/
,rc1\U6l
=GrC. lz:h'rr
Srtxre, E'lt{' Fr
\[rfr,t?A tbra-
{6top.ooMibffi-.,t[.c.effi-zo,ttq
AAE lu'b'o'
F&
I9u=J =-F9E tt ;-Ri e$$a
E $sF$H* S" .S''
r0
o
\
lI
/
o
.?9E?=c!,?5 e
GI 9F1? |
XaF
6l(DxE 2=a=tr
=FHq/ltua
-(1)r|)
O o.,fl €\r{3
GodN:'eg6
-€A. O
-EEo
G
lr;ii;
q)A'F
?=.1
d()-r? |
JAT
dq.)x
rn:trtr59
=tc,)a*a
o\o\
ao
€.)
-lq)+)
IiJi
-NFI
-FtFrl
-.-
tll
: " ii 3ttu.":?::; i i t!.
":;:;:ir? ! i ;Aio : : 6iUJ" EE iixri i
.3eE3=A
ci 'J -!l=r
t6"'
Q=tr
=y(JqA9.C
00
q,)
<)
||r i::i,::iiil
=; ;i jit
m: :; lB_Ni!
-(c)*.
IFf*,i
-Nta,
-FIf-l
.-
FI
--.r,-: r :'.
trj-li,iiir rl
jr r'-:: ::l
.29tr
ct(Jtr=<;5
q)-r L
U] L6tro!?It L rl/
o\
q)
q)
<)
t-a()+)
FI
F,Li
-NFT
-,.t,
-.-A
uL; i ! ii!, l I !-rr":;l;ii19;i lEi; i: EiLu; : E :'sr'ri !
.29tr
cE<Js-
^*;61
d oE
tro!{
= L. \.v
o\
o\
a
q)
<.)
=-= !
'; !i;io,; ' 1 lti
;H;ii;t
u.t ; I : ii
N:i
€,)+r)
:it I
-N
-
-Ft,
-l.ts
-
NI
.2.Qtre==
6(J,'trp<iF
c! (|.).Q
c,)E6tro?aEa
o\o\o\
00
frq)
<,o
-c)-F),-,
HF,l
6nN
cq
-/^.
/-1.-
cq
:ii!iE,
-E ;! I!l
."3 i; l!
t^t? i
NI
.2,QtrSEsEF;
TE;
.E fr€a e6
;EA
-l€)+)
.O orFl €\l{ o\
GodN:cl!6
-roAO-E;o
G
=l;ii;
.?9tr
?E .F
l€tEfr€O Eb
;E'g
g\
o\o\
00
tr(u
q)
riiiii
-(l)
.+.)
A
HH
-a
N
cg
-F.'t
El.l
.ct
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
One Storv Areas
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setabck
Length*Average
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setabck
Length*Average
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setabck
Length*Average
Total Length*Average
Average Setback
One Story Arcas Zehren and Assoctates, Inc.
t0/19199
Road Prop. Line
10.15 15.44
I 1 .31 r2.Ol
21.46 27.51
10.73 13.76
198.51 254.47
12.00 l 1.06
t3.54 5.68
25.54 t6.74
12.77 8.37
376.72 246.92
13.78 9.67
14.18 6.29
27.96 15.96
13.98 7.98
258.63 t47.63
833.85 649.01
PL + Road
25.59
23.38
48.97
24.49
452.97
23.06
t9.22
42.28
21.14
623.63
23.45
20.47
43.92
21.96
406.26
1482.86
2230
Leneth
18.50
29,50
18.50
66.50
t2-54 9.76
Page I
O Three Story Areas
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setaback 12.80 25.87 38.67 26.50Length*Average 339.20 685.42 1024.62
Road Profr. I ine PI + Road I .ength
t2.o9 28.28 40.37
I 3.5 I 23.45 36.q6
25.60 5t.73 77.33
13.51 20.39 33.90
13.5q b.l3 29.32
27.tO 36.12 63.22
Average Setaback 13.55 18.06 31.61 9.94
Length*Average 53.39 7 t.r6 t24.54
North Setback 13.59 t5.73 29.32
South Setback 14-36 q.23 23.59
Total Setback 27.95 24.96 52.91
Average Setaback 13.98 12,48 26.46 35.63Length*Average 497.93 444.66 942.59
North Setback 14.36 9.23 23.59
South Setback | 4.43 12.45 26.88
Total Setback 28.79 2t.68 50.47
Average Setabck 14.40 f 0.84 25.24 3,94Length*Average 56.72 42.7 | 99.43
North Setback 14.43 36.51 50.94
South Setback 14.4q 35.78 50.27
Total Setback 28.92 72.29 l0l.2l
Average Setabck 14.46 36.15 50.61 4.00Length*Average 57.84 144.58 ZOZAZ
Totaf Length*Average 1005.07 l38S.S3 2393.60 74.01
Average Setback 13,58 18.76 32.34
Page 2
Four Storv Areas
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setaback
Length*Average
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setaback
Length*Average
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setaback
Length*Average
North Setback
South Setback '
Total Setback
Average Setabck
Length*Average
Total LengthiAverage
Average Setback
Road Proo. Line
9.04 51.09
9.3s 50.22
18.39 l0l.3l
9.20 50.66
36.78 202.62
9.35 26.18
9.61 21 .51
18.96 47.69
9.48 23.85
37.45 94.t9
9.61
I1.85
21.46
10.73
382.31
11.85
12.00
23.85
11.93
46.98
503.52
10.60
21.51
15.00
36.51
18.26
650.43
t5.00
I 1.06
26.06
13.03
5 1.34
998.57
2t.01
PL + Road
60. 13
59.57
I 19.70
59.85
239.40
35.53
3t.12
66.65
33.33
l3 I .63
3t.t2
26.85
57.97
28.99
1032.74
26.85
23.06
49.91
24.96
98.32
1502.09
31.61
Lensth
35.63
47.52
4.00
3.95
3.94
I Three Storv Areasv Road Proo. Line PL+Road Length
Total Length+Average 1005.07 1388.53 2393.60 74.01
Average Setback 13.58 18.76 32.34
Four Storv Areas
Total Length+Average 503.52 998.57 1502.09 47.52
Average Setback 10.60 21.01 31..61
Total Averape Setback
Total Lngth*Average 1508.59 2387.10 3895.70 121.53
Average Setback 12.41 19,64 32.06
a,
Vail Plata Hotel
961070.00
Level 6
Gross Squrrc Footege
Dwelllnq Unit
Dwclling Unit (uppcr level)
Club ijnirs
Unat NumDer
Club t nit 39 (Uppcr lrvel)
Club Unit 40 (Upper kvel)
Club Unit 4l (Upper l-evel)
Club Unit 42 (Uppcr Lcvel)
Club Unit 43 (Upper l-evel)
CIub Unit 44 (Uoper bvel)
Sub-Totd Club
Corridc (public)
C-ore (clevator)
Maid
Corc (stair)
Mechanical (roollon l
Sub-Totrl Arct
DwElling Unit Net
Club ljnit Nct
Oth€r Net
To1|l NGt
NeUGrosr Dilfcrcncc
kvel 6 Zehren and Associates, lnc.
ro/r9t99
o
7,791.W
Aree
2,002.00
Arcr
4.00
814.00
860.00
715.00
814,00
814.00
4,t31.00
0.00
150.00
0.00
0.00
222.N
372,00
2,002.00
4,831.00
372.@
7,205.00
5t6.00
Deck Area
0.00
Deck Arce
| 01.00
l0 r.00
r 01.00
101.00
101.00
101.00
506.fl)
Bedroom
1.00
t.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
t.00
6.00
. LrlKit
1.00
t.00
l .00
1.00
1.00
1.00
6.00
Pillows
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
440
24.00
Kevs
0.00
Kevs
l00
1.00
t.00
1.00
r.00
1.00
6.00
Bedrooms Lvns Rn Pillows
1.00 0.00 2.00
Page I
Vail Pl,"a Hotet
' 96 r 070.00
Levcl 5
Gfoss Squrfa Footlgc
Dvelline Unlt
Dw€lling Unit (lower l€vel)
Club Units
Unit Nuober
Club Unit 32 (lJpper l-evel)
Club Unit 33 (Uppcr L€vel)
Club Unit 34 (Upper l-evel)
Club Unit 35 (Upper lrvel)
Club tJnit 36 (tjppcr Irvel)
Club unit 39 (Lower bvcl)
Club unit rl0 (t orrcr l-cvel)
Club Unit 4l (lrwer L€veD
Club Unit 42 (I-ower Level)
Club Unit 43 (I-ower Level)
Club unit tl4 fllrver level)
Sub.Totd Club
Othcr Areas
Corridor @ublic)
Core (elevaior, nrcch. shaft)
Maid
Core (stair)
SubTotrl Othcr Arces
Dw€lling Unit Net
Club Unit Net
Otber Net
Totrl Nct
NcUGross Dilfcrcnce
Level 5 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/t9/99
r5,t9t.00
Arcr
3,033.00
Ar€a
814.00
814.00
814.00
E 14.00
814.00
913.00
n9.00
486.00
1,369.00
992.@
99z.00
9,80t.0o
Arcr
I,616.00
151.00
0.00
128.00
rt95.0o
3,033.00
9,E01.00
1.E95.00
14,729.W
r,159.00
Deck Area
450.00
Dcck Arre
154.00
154.00
154.00
154.00
154.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
770.00
Kevs
4.00
Kevs
1.00
r.00
r .00
1.00
1.00
2.N
2.00
1.00
3.00
2.N
2.@
t7.txl
Bedrooms
3.00
Bcdroom
l -00
1.00
1.00
1.00
t.00
2,M
2.00
L00
2.00
2.OO
2.@
16.00
Studio Plllows
1.00 8.00
LR/Kit Plllows
t.00 4.00
r.00 4.00
r .00 4.00
1.00 4.00
t.00 4.00
o.m 4.00
o.00 4.00
0.00 2.00
1.00 6.00
0.00 4.00
o.00 4.00
6.00 44.00
Pzge 2
Vail Plaza Hotel
.961070.00
Level 4
Gross Square Footrgc
CIub Units
Unit Number
Club Unit 19 (Upps l,evel)
Club Unit 20 (Uppcr lrvel)
Club Unit 2l (Upper l",evel)
Club Unit 23 (Flat)
Club Unit 25 (Upper Lcvel)
Club Unit 26 (Uppcr lrvel)
Club Unit 27 (UpFr Lrvel)
Club Unit 3l @aQ
CIub Unit 32 (Ilwer trvel)
Club Unit 33 (Lower Lrvel)
Club Unit 3{L,owrr Lwel)
Club Unit 35 (I-owcr Level)
Club lJnit 36 (rwer kvel)
Club Unit 37 (Flat)
Club Unit 38 Glat)
Sub.'Totel Club
Accomodation Unlts
Unit Type A
Othe r Areas
Conidor (public)
Cor,e (ele tor)
Maid
Corc (stair)
Sub-Totrl (Xher Arers
Club Unit Net
Accornmodation Nct
Other Net
Totrl N€t
NeUGross Difference
Level 4 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/L9/99
o
26,28t.00
Aree
790.00
790.00
790.00
983.00
790.00
790.00
1216.00
I,095.00
513.00
r,034.00
1,034.@
t,034.00
979.00
r234.N
tr34.o0
14306.00
Avc. Area
371.58
Area
2,915.00
t 50.00
209.00
379.U)
3,653.00
14,306.00
6,3r6.79
3.653.00
24,275.79
2,O12.2r
Deck Aree
101.00
t0t.00
t 01.00
250.00
l0l.00
101.00
101.00
10t.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
101.00
101.00
1,159.00
Bedrooms
1.00
t.00
1.00
r.00
1.00
L00
t.00
1.00
1.00
2.O0
2.00
2.00
2.O0
2.00
2.OO
2t.00
Pillows
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4,00
4.00
4.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
62.00
Kevs
t.00
1.00
1.00
2.W
1.00
1.00
t.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.O0
2.N
2.@
2.N
2.@
23.00
Studio
1.00
t.00
1.00
1.00
t.00
1.00
t.00
l 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
t.o0
L00
10.00
Kevs Totrl Arer
17.00 6,316.79
Page 3
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Level 3
Gross Squrre Footagc
Club Units
Unit TVpe
Club lJnit 45 (Flat)
Club Unit 46 (Flat)
Club Unit 17 (Flar)
Club Unit l8 (Flat)
Club Unit | 9 (tower L,evel)
Club thit 20 (I-ower t evc)
Club Unit 2 I (Lowr Lcvel)
Club Unit 22 (Flat)
Club unit 47 (Flat)
Club unit 24 (Flat)
Club Unit 25 (Lower L:vel)
Club lJnit 26 (t ower t-cvel)
Club thit 27 (I-ou/€r lrvcD
Club Unit 28 (Flao
Club Unit 29 (Rat)
Club Unit 30 ffla0
Sub-Total Club Unlts
Accomodrtion Units
Unit Type A
Other Arees
Maid
Corridor (public)
Core (elevator)
Core (stair)
SubTotrl Othcr Arcrs
Totals
Club Net
Accommodation Net
Oth6 Ner
Totrl Net
Nct/Gross Difference
Level 3 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/t9/99
o
11759.00
Area Deck Aree
1,160.00 l0l.00
1,164.00 101.00
7&.00 8l.m
1214.00 81.00
593.00 0.00
1,0EE.00 0.@
1,060.00 0.00
1,t29.00 142.00
975.00 0.00
978.00 0.00
978.00 0,00
97E.00 0.00
97E.00 0.00
95t.00 0.00
r27S.0O 8r.00
t234.OO 81.00
16519.00 66t.00
Studlo Pillows
1.00 4.00
L00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 4.00
0.00 2.00
0.00 4.00
0.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
0.oo 4.00
t.00 4.00
0.00 4.00
0.00 4.m
0.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.@
9.00 66.00
Kevs
1.00
1.00
2.O0
1.00
r.00
2.W
2.00
r.00
2.00
2-00
2.00
2.W
2.W
2-00
2.00
2.N
27.O0
Bedrooms
l 00
t.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.O0
2.00
1.00
1.00
r.00
2.00
2.N
2.N
1.00
2.@
2.O0
24.W
AYe. Arer
368.62
278.O0
4,632.00
150.00
444.@
sF04.00
16,519.00
9,584.00
5.504.00
3t,607.00
1,1s2.00
Kcvs Totel Arce
26.@ 9.584.00
96Vo
Page 4
Vail Plaz Hotel
961070.00
Level 2
Gross Squerc Footege
Club Units
Unit Tvoe
Club Unil 4 (Flat)
Club LJnit 5 (Rat)
Clubtnit6(Flat)
Club Ljnit 7 (Flat)
Club Unit 8 (Flat)
Club Unit 9 (Flat)
Club Unit l0 (Flat)
Club unit ll (Flat)
Club Unil 12 (F1at)
Club Unit l3 (Flat)
Club lJnit 14 (Flat)
Club Unit 15 (Flat)
Club ljnit l6 Glat)
SrtsTotrl Club Urits
Accomodetion Units
Unit Type A
Other Aroas
Maid
Conidor (public)
Core (elevator)
Core (stair)
Sub-Totrl Other Arers
Totels
Club Net
Accommodation Net
Other Nct
Tot l Not
NcUGrocE Dilfcrcrcc
l*vel2 Zehren nd Associates, Inc.
t0^9/99o
33,947.W
Area
t,t92.00
982.00
l, | 93.00
I,485.00
t,042.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969-00
951.00
|,27 5.OO
| 22t.O0
r+rtz.oo
Ave Area
362.85
300.00
4,328.N
150.00
491.00
5,269.00
14,182.00
12,336.E0
5269.@
31,7t7.80
2JS9.m
Deck Area
81.00
0.00
Et-00
142.00
0.00
200.00
0.00
81.00
8t.00
81.00
8t.00
81.00
8t.00
90.00
Bedrooms
2.N
2.00
2.M
2.00
2-OO
1.00
1.00
t.00
t.00
L00
1.00
2.00
2.OO
20.00
Studio
r.00
0.00
t.00
t.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
l.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
11.00
Pillows
6.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
62.O0
Kevs
2.00
1.00
2.00
2-00
I .00
2.00
2.00
2.@
2.W
2-N
2.@
2.00
2.@
u.00
Kws Total Are.
34.00 12,336.80
7.
Page 5
vail Piaza Hotel
96r070.o0
Level I
Gross Squere Footage
Club Units
Unit Tvpe
Club Unit I (Flag
Club unit 2 (Rat)
Club Llnit 3 Glar)
SutsTotd Club Units
Accomodrtion Units
Unit Type A
Retail
Rctail Thrcc
Relail Four
Sub-Totrl Rctdl
Restruratrt
Main Restaurant (Buffet)
Sp€cialtv R6burant
Sub-Totrl R6taurrtrt
Lounge
Lormge
Other Arers
Corridc @ublic)
Kitchen/Servicc
Truck DocldAuto Circ-
Restrmrns
Maid
Core (elevator)
Core (stair)
Sub-Total Olhcr Arees
Totals
Club Nct
Accomrmdation Net
Retail Net
Restaurant Net
[,ounge Net
Other Net
Totrl Nct ArGa
NeUGross Diflererce
Level I Zehren and Associates, Inc.
tut9t99
o
42,028.00
Arer
|,297.00
1,25 t .00
1.542.00
4,090.00
Ave. Aree
353.76
Aret
875.00
0.00
t75.00
Deck Arcr
81.00
81.00
t42.@
304.00
Bedrooms
2.00
2.N
2-00
6.00
Kws
2.00
2.O0
2.00
6.00
Studio Pillows
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
t.00 6.00
3.00 t8.00
Arer Occ. Frctor Occupr r
2,155.00 18.00 119.72
1.648.00 25.00 6s.92
3,t03.(xl 1t5.64
KeYs Total Aree
2!.00 7,429.00
Occ. Frctor Occuprnts
r 8.00 68.22
@
r22E.00
5,1,14.00
E,132.00
6263.00
589.00
293.00
275.OO
546.00
21,u2.00
4,090.00
7,429.00
875.00
3,803.00
r328.00
2t -242.N
3t,667.00
3,361.00
Page 6
Vail Piaza Hotel
961070.00
l,errel 0
Grosr Squ.re Footrg€
Reiril
Retril One
Rrtail Two
SubTohl Retril
Lobbv Bar
Iobby Bar
Lobbv
tobby
Administrrdon
Frmt D€sk
Accountinq
Totd Administrrtioo
Soa - Menrs/Workout
Mefl 's lrckers/Facilities
TrEatsrEnt
Deck
Excrcis€/Workout
Sub'Totel Spr
Coufcrence
Main Ballroom
Pre<qrvenc
SubTotd Confercncc
Servlce Areas
Ertcrior Circulrtion
Covered Ramp (North)
Covered Auto Entry (West)
Covered Pedesfian (East)
Totrl
Other Areas
Restsooms
Cce (elevator)
Corc (Shir)
Corridorcublicl
Totrl Otber Arcrs
Perkinq Provided
Valet Spaces
Level 0
Occuo.
32.3s
Occuo.
t0.t?
Occuprnts
466.93
355.00
Zehren and Associates. Inc.
t0n9t99
r1t,675,00
1,615.00
1.330.00
2945.00
Arce
647.M
Arca
2,425.N
2,192.W
l3/t0.00
3532lto
3,150.00
2447.N
1,392.N
1.686.00
8,67s.00
Arer
7,004.00
2.485.00
9,4AD.m
6J18.00
I,008.00
5,264.00
1.368.00
7,6,t0.00
sE9.00
275.W
568.00
3.740.00
5,r72.00
12.00
Occ. Fact.
20.00
Occ. Frct
30.00
@-Eer
15.00
7.00
Page 7
Vail Plaa Hotel
961070.00
Totrls
Rcrqil Net
Bar Nci
lobby Nct
Administratim Nct
Sp. Net
Conference Nct
Scrvic. Nct
Extaia Circuhtim Net
Othcr Nct
Totrl Net
Ncl/lGrorr ltiflcrcrcc
2,945.00
647.00
2,426.00
3,532.00
8,675.00
9,489.(n
6318.00
7540.W
s.172.00
46144.00
t,831.00
Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0n9t99
o
95'/e
Page 8
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070-00
Levcl Mlnus One
Gross Sq[rr€ Footegc
Spg
Worn€n's Lockers/Facilities
Treatmsnt
Deck Ar€a
Excrcisey'Workout
Pool Area
SubTohl Spl
Conference
Breakout
Pre-conv€ne
Sub-Totrl Confercn.€
Service
Other Areas
Mechsnical
Coridor(Public)
Core (elevrtor)
Core (stair)
Public Restooms
Sub-Totrl
Parkinp Provldcd
Valet Spsccs
Parking Spaces (Full Size)
Parkins Spaccs (Coqrpact)
Sub-Tobl Prrkirg
Totals
Other Ar€as Net
Spa Net
Conference Net
Service Net
Parkine and Rafip Net
Totrl Nct
Net/Gross Dllfercnce
kvel -l
Occ. F.ctor OccuDrptr
15.00 224.27
7 .W 355.00
llq Arrdsp.cc
2r,2t9.O0 367
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
loil9t99
s5,39t.00
Arcr
3,150.00
2,090.00
5Jl1.00
7E6.00
2.872.00
r4,609.00
Arcr
33s.00
2.485.00
5,t49.0n
797t.N
I17.00
2289.00
2'ts.oo
568.00
589.00
3"838.00
Sprcc3
2.00
49.00
7.O0
5t.00
@
3,838.00
14,609.00
5,849.00
7,97t.O0
212E9.00
sr556.00
r,835.00
Page 9
Vail Plaza Holel
961070.00
Level Minus Two
Gro$ Squ$c Footrge
Other Areas
Mechanical
Conidm (public)
Corc (clcvator)
Core (stair)
Srb.Totrl Oaher Ar.ri
Arer
Valet Spaces
Parking Spaces (Full Size)
Parkinq Soaces (Cornpactl
Sub.Totrl Prrbng
Totals
Other Net
Parkinq and Ranp N€t
Totrl Net
Nel/Grocs Dilfcrcncc
Level -2
270.9259259
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
to/l9/99
0.00
225.N
150.00
285.00
650.00
53,2?t.00
l04.00
85.00
0.00
rt9.00
Arca
660.00
5 | 205.00
s1,t65.00
r,406.00
Page l0
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Dwellins Units
Dwelling Unit I
Club Units
Club Unit I (Flat)
Club Unit 2 (Flat)
CIub Unit 3 (Rat)
Club Unit 4 (Flat)
Club Unit 5 (Flat)
Club Unit 6 @at)
Club Unit ? (Flar)
Club Unit 8 (Flat)
Club Unit 9 (Flat)
Club Unit l0 (Flat)
Club Unit ll (Flat)
Club Unit t2 (Flat)
Club Unit 13 (Rat)
Club Unit 14 (Rat)
Club Unit l5 (Fla0
Club Unit 16 (Flag
Club Unit l7 (Flat)
Club Unit l8 (Flat)
Club Lrnit 19 (Two tevel)
Club Unit 20 CIno l".vcl)
Club Unit 2l (Two l-evel)
Club tlnit 22 (Flat)
Club Unit 23 (Flat)
Club unit 24 (Flat)
Club Llnit 25 (Two trvel)
Club Unit 26 (Two L€vel)
Club Unit 27 (Two Lcvcl)
Club Unit 2E (Flat)
Club Unit 29 (Flat)
Club Unit 30 (FIal)
Club Unit 3l (Flat)
Club Unit 32 (Two L:vel)
Club Unit 33 (Two trvel)
Club Unir 34 (Two lrvel)
Club Unit 35 (Two Llvcl)
Club Unit 36 (Iwo hvel)
Club Unit 37 (Flat)
Club unit 38 (nat)
Club Unit 39 (Two l-evel)
Club Unit 40 (Two l,evel)
Club Unit 4l (Iwo lrvcl)
Club Unit 42 (Iwo tevel)
Club Unit 43 (Two kvel)
Club Unit 44 (Two Level)
Club Unit 45 (Flat)
Club Unit 46 (Flat)
Club Unit 47 (Flat)
Totel Club Perking
Parking Summary
Tot.l Arer Park. Factor Park. Req'd
5,035.00 >2000 2.50
Zehren and Associates- Inc.
to/t9/99
Totsl Arer
|,297 .00
1,251.00
|,542.00
I,192.00
982.00
I,193.00
1,485.00
r,M2.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
9s1.00
|,27 5.O0
r22r.00
764.00
|,2t4.00
1,383.00
1,E78.00
1,850.00
l,129.00
983.00
978.00
r,768.00
t,768.00
2,194.W
95 t .00
1,275.00
1,234.W
1,095.00
r,327.Q0
1,848.00
1,848.00
1,848.00
1,793.00
1,234.00
|,234.00
|,727 .00
|,793.00
1,346.00
2,084.00
1,806.00
r,606.00
1,t60.00
I,164.00
975.00
63,729.00
Frctor Sps
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.N
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.N
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.M
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
50{K2000 2.N
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<200,0 2.00
500<2000 2.N
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
>2000 2.50
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2-00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
5fiX2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
>2000 2.50
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
95.00
Page I I
Vail Plaza Hotel
96t070.00
Accommodrtion Units
Total Acc. Units
Restaurant
Tolal Restaurant
Lounge
T06l l..oungc
Reteil
Total Rctail
Conference
Main Ballroom
Brcakout
Totel Reouircd Sorces
Totrl Drrelling Unir
Totll Club
Total Accofirnodation
Totol Rcstaurant
Tolsl Irunge
Totrl Rctail
Confeicnc€
Addl SDD Pa*ing Required*
Ps*inq Deficit (Prcv. SDD)
Sub-Tolrl PrHng
Mixed Use Reductior (10%)
Tohl PrrHng Requircd
Totrl Perking Providcd
Prddrg lrlffcrctrcc
Parkine Prodded
Previous SDD*
kvel Zero Parking
l-cvcl Minus Onc Parking
I-cvel Minus Two Parkine
Totd PrrHng Provlded
Pcrccntrgc
Parking Summary
Soeces
7487
Scrts
rE5.64
Serts
65.92
Se!!!
466.93
224.27
Valet
0
t2
2
104
llt
32./.
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0il9t99
&
35,666.59
Arer
3,803.00
ATCI
1,875.00
Arer
3,820.00
@
7,00f.00
3,3&.00
2.50
95.00
74.87
1a'r1
8.24
12.73
43-20
70.00
75.00
4|'d.75
40.4't
!64
371
7
Full Size
ltt
0
49
E5
246
6U.
Kevs
98.00
Sert Frct.
20.49
Sert Frct
25.00
&r
l:300 sq. ft.
Seat Fact,
15.00
15.00
Cornpact
0
0
7
a
7
2./.
Total
tt2
t2
58
189
371
lw.
tr'rctor
l:t seats
Frctor
l:8 s€as
Soeces
23.21
SDrc€c
8.U
Spracs
12.73
Frctor Sprcea
l:16 seats** 29.18
l:16 seatsr' l4.0i,
* I 12 total spaces exist (42 owned by phase IV)
*rassume 50% intemal/public bansportetion/pedestrian tsaffi c
Page 12
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Unit I
Club Units
Club Unit I (Flat)
Club Unit 2 (Flat)
club unit 3 (Flar)
Club Unit 4 (Flat)
Club Unil 5 (Rat)
Club Unit 6 (Flat)
Club Unit 7 (Flat)
Club Unit 8 (Rat)
Club unit 9 (Flat)
Club Unit l0 (Flat)
ClubUnirll(FlaD
Club unit l2 (Flat)
Club unit l3 (Flat)
Club unit l4 (Flat)
Club Unit 15 (Flat)
Club Unit l6 (Flat)
Club Unit l7 (Flat)
Club Unit l8 (nat)
Club Unit l9 (Two Level)
Club Unit 20 (Two t€vel)
Club Unit 2l (Two l-evel)
CIub Urit 22 (Flat)
Club Unit 23 (Flat)
Club Unit 24 (Flat)
Club Unit 25 (Two level)
Club Unit 26 (Two Level)
Club Unit 27 (Two l-evel)
Club Unit 28 (Flat)
Club Unit 29 (Flat)
Club Unit 30 (Rat)
Club Unit 3l (Rat)
Club Unit 32 (Two Level)
Club Unit 33 (Two t vel)
Club Unit 34 (Two trvel)
CIub Unit 35 (Two kvel)
Club Unit 36 (Two I-evel)
Club Unit 37 (nat)
Club t nit 38 (nat)
Club Unit 39 (Two tevel)
Club Unit 40 (Two I-evel)
CIub Unit 4l (Two bvel)
Club Unit 42 (Two kvel)
Club Unit 43 (Two trvel)
Club Unit 44 (Two lrvel)
Club Unit 45 (Flat)
Club Unit 46 (Rat)
Club Unit 47 (Flat)
Total Club Units
Program Summary
Upper Area Lower Area Total Area
2,002.00 3,033.00 5,015.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
to/t9/99
LR/I(it Pillows
10.00
LR/Kit Pillows
l.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
I .00 6.00
1.00 6.00
0.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
l.00 6.00
0.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
| .00 4.00
1.00 4.00
I .00 4.00
I .00 4.00
1.00 6.00
t.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 8.00
t.00 8.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 6.00
2.O0 10.00
|.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 4.00
l.o0 4.00
0,00 4.00
4s.00 266.00
Uooer Area
t,297 .00
1,251.00
1,542.00
| ,192.00
982.00
l,193.00
1385.00
t,o42.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
951.00
t,275.00
| 22t.O0
764.N
1214.00
790.00
790.00
790.00
I,129.00
983.00
978.00
790.00
790.00
l:16.00
951.00
|,27 5.00
1,234.O0
r,095.00
814.00
814.00
814.00
8t4.00
814.00
\,234.00
r234.00
814.00
814.00
860.00
715.00
814.00
8t4.00
1,160.00
I, t 64.00
975.0Q
47,729.00
Lower Area
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
591.00
I,O88.00
1,060.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
97E.00
978.00
978.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
513.00
1,034.00
1,034.00
1,034.00
9?9.00
0.00
0.00
913.00
979.00
486.00
l,369.00
992.00
992.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16,000.00
Total Area
t,297.00
I,251.00
1,542.00
1,192.00
982.00
1,193.00
I,485.00
t,042.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
951 .00
| 275.00
t22r.00
'tu.N
t,2t4_oo
1,383.00
1,878.00
r,E50.00
1,129.00
983.00
978.00
1,768.00
t,768.00
2,t94.00
951.00
r275.OO
1,234,00
1,095.00
|,32't .00
1,848.00
1,848.00
1,848.00
I,791.00
1234.00
1,234.00
l,'t27.00
1,793.00
1,346.00
2,O84.00
1,806,00
l,806.00
I,160.00
I,164.00
975.00
63,729.0O
Page I 3
Deck fuea
450.00
Deck Area
81.00
81.00
t42.00
81.00
0.00
81.00
t42.O0
0.00
200.00
0.00
8l.00
81.00
81.00
81.00
81.00
81.00
81.00
8l .00
l0l .00
101.00
l0l .00
142.00
250.00
0.00
l0t.00
101.00
101.00
0.00
8l .00
8l.00
l0l .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
l0l .00
101.00
101.00
101.00
101.00
l0l .00
l0l.00
101.00
| 0l .00
101.00
0.00
3,727.00
Kevs Bedrooms
4.00 4.00
Keys Bedrooms
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
2.OO 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
2.O0 2.00
1.00 2.w
2.00 1.00
2.OO L00
2.00 1.00
2.O0 1.00
2.00 1.00
2.N 1.00
2.OO 2.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
2.OO 2.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 1.00
2.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.m
3.00 3.00
2.00 1.00
2.N 2.00
2.00 2.N
2.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
2-00 2.u)
2.W 2.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.w
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
2_00 2.00
4.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 l.00
2.00 L00
98.00 EE.00
Vail P|aza Hotel
961070.00
Accommodrtion Utrits
Totrl Acc- Unitc
Residcntirl TotrlE
Restaurrnt
Main Rastaurant
Speci8ltv Restaurant
Totd Rertaurrnt
Lounce
I-obby Bar
Conferonce Fecllltes
Main Balhoom
Breakout
Prc-Convene
Totrl Convention
Soe
I*vel Zerc
kvel Minus One
Totrl
Retrll
Retail One
Retail TWo
Retail Thre€
Retail Four
Tot l R.tril
Admlnstration
Program Sunrnary
Totrl Arer Deck Arer
35.666.59 0.00
SGrts
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0ll9/99
o RoomArcr Rooms
t63.94 98.00
Satins Arer Oca. Frctor
7,@4 15
3,3U 15
4.no
1sJ38
E,675.00
14.609.00
23,2t4-0O
l6l5
1330
E75.00
0.00
31t20.00
3532.00
Kevs
9t.00
200.00
Bedrooms
98.00
190.00
Pillows
196.00
472.00104,430.59
Scrtilq Arer Occ. Frctor Serts
2,155.00 18.00 n9.72
1.64t.00 25.00 65.92
3,t03.00 20.19 185.64
1,648.00
467
224
355
Page | 4
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Dwelling Unit
Club Unit
Accommodadon unit
Retail
lrbby
Restaurant
[-ormge/Bar
Conf€rsnce
Pre-Convtere
Kitchen
Food and Bevcragc
Front olhce
Saleycat€r. (multi-use)
Accounting
ExecutiYc O{fice
Receiving/Storagc
Personnel (oIlice)
Scrvicc Arcss
bundry
Housekccping
Engineering
Trff$:t'
Spa Clrlatln€nt)
Pool D€ck
Pool Arra
Exscise Roorns
Corridor (public)
Corridor (scrvice)
Corc (clcvator)
Core (stair)
Parking (spaces, rarp)
Club Unit Storage Arca
Restrooms/CoatvEic.
Loading Dock
Seruice Storage
Maid (Ssrellite)
Sub-Total Nct Arers
Cross-Net (wall) Area
Gross-Net Factor
Level -2 Level -t
53271.00 55,391.0O
3,164.00
2,4E5.00
Level 0 Level I
48,675.00 42,Q28-00
Level 2 Level3 Level 4
33,947.00 32;159.00 26288.00
Level 5
15,89E.00
3,033.00 2,002.00
9,801.00 4,E3t.00
1,616.00 0.00
151.00 150-00
128.00 0.00
Area Summary
Level 6 Totel
7J91.00 3t6,048.00
225.00
t50.oo
285.00
5l,205.00
l,406.00
97%
I 17.00
3,t50.oo
2,090.00
5,711.00
2,412.OO
786.00
2,289.00
2'15.00
56E.00
2t289.00
589.00
t,835.00
97yo
2,945 M
2,426.00
647.OO
7,004.00
2,4E5.00
2,192.N
l,340.00
3, r 50.00
2,447.00
1,392.00
1,6E6.00
3,740.00
275.00
568.00
7,640.00
I,831.00
96yo
4,090.00
7,429.00
875.00
3,803.00
r,228.00
s,144.00
275.OO
546.00
3,361.00
92V.
4,32E-00
150.00
49 t .00
2,t59.20
94%
4,632.00
150.00
444.00
1,152.00
96V.
14,306.00
6,3t6.79
2,915.00
150-00
379.00
2,0t2.21
92%
0.00
t4,729.0O
I,169.00
93%
o.00
7,205.00
586.00
92%
5,035.00
63,729.00
35,656.59
3,E20.00
2,426.00
3t03.00
I,875.00
r0J6t.00
4,970.00
0.00
0.00
2,r9L00
0.00
r340.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
442r.N
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
339.00
6J0o.qo
4,537.txt
7,r03.00
z,ETLOO
1472.On
24,t89.00
0.00
1,726.00
3,409,00
80,r 34.00
0.00
t,761.00
5,263.00
0.00
1.080.00
300,536.s9
15,51t.4l
950/"
14,182.00 16,519_00
12,336.t0 9,584.(x)
7,9't t.00 6,3r 8,00 E,132.00
0.00 0.00
5t,t55.00 53,556.00
589.00 589.00
6,263.@
0.00 293.00
,t6,8,14.00 38,667.00
300.00 2?8.00 209.00
31,787.80 3t,607.00 24,275.79
Page 15
'--_-
tnttr
Vail Plaza Hotel
Proposal Comparison
(revised l0/lll99)
The following table provides a comparison bctwcen the 1998 Vail Plaza Hotel proposal and the most recent 1999
Vail Plaza Hotel proposal
Development 1998 SDD Malor '1999 SDD MajorStandard/ Amendment Proposal Amendment Proposal Plus/llinus
Lot Area: 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft. No Change
GRFA: 133% or 200,460 sq. ft. '117o/o ot | 75,666 sq. ft. 16h or 24,794 sq. tt.
(129,156 sq. ft. proposed) (104,362 sq. fL proposed) (- 24,7!X sq. ft.)
Dwelling
units per acre: 0.29 du/acre 0.29 du/acre No Change
(276 au) (98 au) - 178 au
(15 ffu) (aa ffu) + 29 tfu
(1 du) (1 du) No Change
Site coverage: 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. No Change
Setbacks:front: 12' 6' - 6'sides: 5', 0', 8'& 6' 5',0', 2', & 5' nc, nc, -6, -1rear: 8' 5' - 3'
Height: 85.75' sloping 73' sloping - 12.75'87.5'(arch.proj.) 73.75'(arch. proj.) - 13.75'
Parking: 394 parking spaces 256 parking spaces - 138 parking spaces
(218 ne\,v parking spaces)
(42 existing parking spaces)
Loading: six berths five berths - one berth
Com m ercial
sq. footage: 23h or 47,226 sq. tt. 26% or 46,124 sq. tt. +3% and - 1 ,102 sq. ft.
Gross Building Area: approx. 395,862 sq. ft. approx. 295,557 sq. ft. - 100,305 sq. ft.
Conference/ MeetingFacility: approx. 21,009 sq. ft. approx. 15,338 sq. ft. - 5,671 sq. ft.
Spa Area: approx. 27,802 sq. ft. approx.22,827 sq.lt. - 4,975 sq. ft.
F leveryon e\pec\memos\wi pc
g-, ,a i- *
:gl ;g 1 -|-{? t
EEI +s5 # . sFgE ;
Efl $E3 i $ .*.ffiFg$ $ H
n
cit,
(oNN
|.j!f
o
IL?t'PO.Fe6oll:R
.=bv'ni
EEl aSgl Hg rr q
iggfglg.=r$g
rl
do
(o
ct)dclrX b
n\J.-Uh .a |.t-9= dt=A 5 E.E= a*- E (,o-- oYf u,-a-H *sP 9 E
=55 tsg SS;= C *
*r 6'E
-+ tr .E;.9 E sEl hdE 1"El .E SrJ S
-Hl H drr s FE:Il or :;;E=l *i bsH * by'=l ixp._--€ N,trEl 9gOOX q,
.El :El gEEr
EEI fi 9'" g .B q
{!l Ei ifl E s e;
EEI3Af;5ERRR$EirE$
o,a
o
Eo
.9,
o(r
lr
EA;ii, Hg
35;
Er, :.; -F g,:#g
gf| {E Ec J$ F F
Eo
oU>?';soo(!-Cr1-:<
'.i
,:s
c{ Al
8R(rto(0 rf,
OsooIt rDhoEb
F. '!(o()rlt;s,
td
.Na
J
s,EP 2? '99 tT"44 FR FHU 93 72L A832 T0 L9?A949Lge6 P.s2/tt
FELSBURG
H
U?o 3LT &
-LEVIG
€ngineezing paths rc transPortadon soh.tions
OLT
LLEV
September 27, 1999
Mr. Tim Losa
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 1976
Avqn, Colorado E1620
RE: Supplemental Traffic lmpact Study
Vail Plaza Hotel
FHU Rcference No. 99-199
Dear Mr. Losa:
This letter repon has been prepared to address eccess issues associated with the proposed
Vail Plaza Hotel. The scope ol work for this repon is summarized as follows:
. Updare the site trip generation associated with the current land use program and
compare the estimated trips with the previous trip generation identificd in our
September 1998 traffic impact study. Trip generation estimates for the existing
development will also be identified.
. Assign site generated vehicle trips to the currenlly proposed access intersections along
both Vail Road and the South Frontage Road.
o Address traffic eperations at each of the propos€d access inlersections to derermine
levels of service and any necessary improvoments.
r Address other access issues identified by the Town of Vail.
This lener report supplements the findings of th€ tralfic impact study dated September 1998.
303.721.r440
fax 303.?21.0E32
fhu@lhucng.com
Grccn, ood Coryonte Plaza
7951 L Maplewoo<i Ave. Sre. 20O
Eagte'rrxd, CO 8011I
-,v
, s,EP 2? '99 T1.244 FR FHU
September 27, 1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 2
383 ?2r 9832 T0 L9?g949rAAA P.A3/L1,
Site Trip Generafon
Vehiclc-trip ratcs and cquations documented an Ii@lion, (lnstitute of Transportation
Engineers, Sixth Edition, 1997), were used to estimate the vehicle-trips generated by the
existing and proposed development. A 50 percent reduction was applied to the traffic
generated by the proposed restaurant, lounge, and retail areas. This uinternal" trip reduction
is based on the assumption that hotel patrons and condo residents will be the primary user of
these areas and that they will walk to these areas. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation
esrimates associated with the existing development.
Table 1
Existing Trip Generation Estimates
As shown in Table 1 , it is estimated that the site currently generates approximately 1,O42 trips
per day, with about 76 trips during the AM peak hour and 9O trips during the PM peak hour.
Table 2 summarizes the trip generation associated with the current development plan. As
shown, rhe currently proposed plan is expected to generated approximarely 1,457 trips per day
with a total of 85 trips during the AM peak hour and 127 trips during the PM peak hour.
Condo/
Townhouse
23o 22 Dwelling
Unhs
124 3 7 10 7 5 12
Hotcl 310 58 Rooms 478 20 12 32 19 17 36
Restaurant 831 2 1,OO0's
sq. ft.
86 I o 1 5 z 7
Lounge/Bar'836 I r,ooo's
Sq. Pr-
26 o o o .t 1 4
Market 852 2 1,OO0's
Sq. Ft.
324 't6 17 33 't6 l5 31
Total Triga 1,O42 39 37 76 50 40 9()
ITE - lnsrhute of Tfansponation Engineers
' PM peak hour trips for Lounge/Bar 15% of Daily
o
SEP 2? '99 L1.'44 FR FHU
September 27,1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 3
3A3 721 A832 T0 L9?g949LAAg P.A44L
Relative to the September 1998 plan, the current plan will generate about 50 percent fewer
vehicle-trips. While the currently proposcd plan includes an increased number of condominium
units, lt represents a significant decrease in the number of lodging units and commercial uses.
The net effect is a significant reduction in trips generated by the Vail Plaza Hotel relative to
the previous proposal.
Teblo 2
Trip Gencration Estimates - Propoged Plan
ForccasEd Trallic Vofuncs
ln the previous (September t 9981 development plan, access to the proiect was only provided
atong the South Frontage Road- ln the current plan, the primary access has been moved to
Vail Road, and access to the project site along the Frontage Road will be limited ro
delivery/employee vehicles (refer to the site plan on Figure 1 ). However, access to the existing
Vail Village Inn Phase lll will continue to share access along the Frontage Road.
ljii :i; i; r:rlr,liilJ i iijpj ririii; ' ; iiir
,':;tir#
li,dufujr-lllsl'#
Condo/
Townhouse
230 50 Dwelling
Units
293 5 17 22 17 10 27
Hotel 310 100 Rooms 423 34 22 56 32 28 60
Restaurant 831 4 1,000'5
Sq' ft.
180 z 0 2 lo 5 '1 5
Lounge/Bar'836 2 1,OOO',s
5q. Fr.
80 o 0 o I 4 12
Speciahy Retail
Center
814 4 1,000's
Sg. Fl.
81 2 3 5 6 7 l3
Total Trips - Cunenr Plan 1,457 43 42 85 73 54 127
Total Trips - Previous (Scptember 19981 Plan 3,081 104 73 177 144 115 259
Difference - 1.624
G 53%t
-61 -3r .92
t. sz%t
-71 -61 - 132
(- 51%t
ITE - lnsritute of Ttansponation Engineers
r PM peak hour tips lor LounEe/Ear '15% ot Daily
, SEP 2? '99 11:45 FR FHU
September 27,1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 4
3A3 ?2L 4832 T0 L9?q949LA8A P.A5/LL
The distribution estimates identlfied in the September 1998 raffic impact study were used to
assign peak hour site traffic (from Table 2) to each of the proposed access points. The site
generated traffic assignments are summarized on Figure 2.
Background (non-site related) traffic volume forecasts for the year 2O15 were atso obtained
from the September 1998 traffic impact study, and these forecasts are summarized on
Figure 3. The traffic volume forecasts shown on this figure also include traffic Aenerated by
the existing Vail Village Inn Phase lll condos.
The peak hour site generated traffic volumes from Figure 2 were combined with background
traffic volumes to obtain the total forecasted (year 20151 traffic at the site access
intersections. These volumes are summarized on Figure 4.
Traffrc Opentions at Propond Access lntersections
Site generated traffic associated with the previous development plan was estimated to account
for less than 2.3 percent of the total traffic entcring the roundabou in thc year 2015. The
current dcvelopment plan will account for less than 1.5 percsnt of the total entering traffic.
Given this slight change and the significant reduction in forccasted site traffic, the traffic
operational conditions identified in the September 199E traffic study for the roundabout were
not specifically updated. Instead, the traffic analysis specifically focuses on the site access
intersections to determine future levels of service and needed intersection improvements.
The analysis o{ the proposed Vail Road access intersections was conducted assuming a
counter-clockwise circulation pattern (internallyl through the entry area of the site. The results
of the capacity analyses are summarized on Figure 4 and indicate the following:
o The inbound left-turn along Vail Road (at the southern access) will operate with a
LOS B during the peak hour with a combined through/left-turn lane.
. The outbound turning lane onto Vail Road (at the northern accessl will operate with a
LOS D during the peak hour.
r The inbound left-turn at the Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS C or better
during the peak hour.
r The outbound turning lane at the Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS E
during the peak hour. Overall, a relatively low volume of tralfic (less than 15 vehicles
per hour) will be subject to this delay. Also, the cxisting median lane can bc used by
lett-turning vehicles as a "hatbor" area while waiting for an acceptable gap to merge
with westbound traffic.
o
sEP 2? '99 11:45 FR Fru
September 27, 1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 5
3A3 ?21, 0832 T0 L9?A949LA8A P.A6/Lt
Access lssues
As requested by the Town, we have evaluated the close proximity of the proposed "exit"
driveway along Vail Road to the existing driveway to the Galeway Building. From an
operational or level of servic€ standpoint, it makes little difference if the proposed acsess is
an 'entrancc' driveway or an "exit driveway". From a safety standpoint, however, it may not
be desirable to make the nonhern access an "entrance' driveway since it creates an
overlapping left-turn conflict area (i.e. drivers making a nonhbound to westbound left-turn into
the propeny located west of the project site would have difficulty determining whether a
southbound driver was turning left into the Gateway site orthe Vail Plaza Hotel)- Therefore,
it is recommended that the nonhern access be an exit only. The access driveways along Vail
Road need to be constructed to allow for no sight obstructions (walls, trees, shrubs, etc)
between them. This will maximize driver visibility and improve safety.
Along the Frontage Road, trucks will need to be able to back into the delivsry area on the north
side of the propeny. Due to on-site space limltations, this maneuver would be done from a
proposed parallel (detachedl turning lane along the souttr side of the Frontage Road. Since this
parallcl lane is separated from the through tratfic on the Frontage Road by a raised i5land, we
do not anticipate any off-site trafflc conflicts. Howcvcr, in order to ensurc one.way opcration
along this parallet access, it is recommended that "Do Not Enter" signs be posted at the east
end near the edge of the Frontage Road.
TheCo|oradoDepartmentofTransponation's|CDoT|Wwasutilized
to determine if auxiliary right-tufn acceleration and deceleration lanes would be required for the
proposed Fronlage Road access. The State Code requires right-turn deceleration lanes when
the forecasted right-turn volume is greater than 50 vehicles per hour. A righr-turn acceleration
lane is only required by the State on single lane roadways with posted speeds greater than 40
mph and a right-turn volume greater than 50 vehicles per hour. Based on the forecasted taffic
volumes identified on Figure 4, none of the State's auxiliary lane requirements would be met.
Summary
. The current development plan is expccted to generated approximately 1,457 trips per
day with a total of 85 trips during the AM peak hour and 127 trips during the PM peak
hour. The current plan will gcnerate about 50 percent fewer trips than the previous
{september 19981 Plan-
. lt is recomm€ndod that the northern site access along Vaal Road be an "exit" only, as
proposed. The outbound turning lane onto Vail Road will operate with a LOS D during
the Peak hour.
#P 27 '99 11:45 FR FHU
September 27, 1999
Mr Tlm Losa
Page 6
3A3 ?2L 6S32 T0 t9?A949t68,4 P.A?/Lt
It is recommended that the Sguthern site access along Vail Road be an 'entrance" only,
as proposcd. The inbound left-turn will operate with acceptable levels of service
(LOS Bl during the p€ak hour with a combined through/left-turn lane. A left-turn pocket
should not be needed along Vail Road.
There should be no sight obstrustions (walls, trees, shrubs, etc) between the northern
access and the existing Gateway access along Vail Road to minimize potential turning
conflicts.
The inbound left-turn at the Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS C or better
during the peak hour.
The outbound turning lane at the Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS E
during the peak hour. Overall, a relatively low volume of traffic (less than 15 vehlcles
per hourl will be subject to this delay. Also, the existing m€dian lane can be used by
left-turning vehicles as a uhatbor" area while waiting for an acceptable gap to merge
with wcstbound traffic.
No off-site traffic conflicts are anticipated between rhe proposed parallel access lane
and the Frontage Road due to the proposed raised lsland. However, it is recommended
that'Do NOt Enter" signs be posted in orderto ensure one-way (eastbound) operation
along this parallel access.
o Based on rhe forecasted traffic volumes identified on Figure 4, none ol the State's
auxiliary lane requirements would be met. That is, neither a right-turn dcceleration lane
or a right-turn acceleration lane would be warranted according lo the State HighwaJ
Access Code.
lf you have any questions regarding our findings, please call.
Sincerely
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
Lawrence C. Lang
Attachments
K<;
,SEP 2? '99 LL'46 FR FHU 3A3 ?2L 9832 T0 t97o949La,8,@ P.Ag/tL
fGp!
=(LirE
ct)
flEro
E?It\t
I
o
o
o€o'4 DF>6*s;i'-'J
o
at
U!
:E
!
t
K<!
3A3 ?21, AA32 rO I97A949LABA P.69/tIw 2? '99 rL:.6 FR Fl-{.J
224
NEge
o) --l! cD'6o
o
(o
o--a
fx
t-r
7?
fn
o
lltl
t\?
N
Crl
t-g<-1\rg
elt
loIs
nt{-*
Vail*4 ara
x8IT
6
ao)cI()
8.9
F=
=€:aq:6-6 .sq) .Lo-F>.9o-(,
Itl
ozut(5
ulJ
$f
E
!
l
le
?
a
!
t
3A3 ?2L A832 T0 L97A949LAAA P.TA/LLSEP 2? '99 L1.'46 FR FHU
(o ui, odrFoso traN 5ii=t
E
=r|-oLF
Ec5oL(t)
J()
(6o
EE-
-9> I
-r! =?s.EF:t
,- >E
t
I
I
I
1!,outNrO
tl
t-g
1-6
tltl
tw
o
6A|
oioo
rg\\$\o\
:
.9
o6('
5l.>ft:3;:vJ
N.
ooeI
.s2
E
f
l<6o,(L
EG
u
xxx
K<!
F
eI
eI
Bs
E
T
!c
s
.c
6-
393 ?2t AA32 rO L9'-?A949LABA P .1_!/LL. sEP 2? '99 ttt46 FR FHU
1742-t
aDg
.9
--Ecooo
(s
(d
,o
$!os56GlE-dI
I-t
E
\roz+
(g\\Il\e\\'
66-\
75E -----
L-g3- 976
I xl
frr
i
\*.,
6l
C.lu)
C\I
c(o6
{
p'3
Esi=E9tr-3
=iooTI
-v-g=66.:3re3z>9(L(LC/'
llllI
ol
$7
|odod3h>n)Ei#o=
XX TOTAL PAGE.11 XX
()romt OFVAIL
Department of Community Deve lopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452
October 21,1.999
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zebren & Associates, Inc.
48 East Beaver Creek Boulevard
Avon, Colorado 81620
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
Dear Tim,
Thank you for appearing before the Town of Vail Design Review Board on Wedncsday, October 20, I 999, for a
second conceptual revicw ofthe proposed Vail Plaza Hotel.
The purpose of this letter is to provide you rvith a written summary of thc Board's comments. The following is a list
of the comments:
The redesigned tower at the southeast comer of the hotel still does not provide adequate pedestrian circulation.
The towcr design needs to be incorporated and integrated into the design of the hotel. The goal of the redesign
is to significantly open up the space and reduce the restrictive nature of the currcnt design.
The spaces between thc buildings (Phase III, Phase V & Gateway) are not acceptable. The walkway along thc
northside of the hotel leading to the Gateway Building must be provided. The design of the walkway shall be
interesting and inviting. The drivcway ramp leading down into the parking structue should be increased in
slope to thc maximum allowed to increase the siz.e of the plaza area above. The proposal to incorporate
archways and gates in the areas betwccn thc buildings is good. The archways and -qates should varying in size
and appcarance, yet maintain an overall recognizable themc.
Thc walkway between the pff)l area and the Phase I buildings must be increased in width. The goal of the
change is to improve lhe 1'eel and flow of pedestrian traffic throughout the District. The proposed open rail
design is good. Please provide section drawings of Lhe pool dcck retaining walls to illustrate landscape planter
design antl sizes. Overall, the pool deck design with the cascading pools is yery attractive.
Grcater articulation must be introduced along thc South Fronrase Road. As desigred the street-edse is ttxr
straight and lincar and does not conibrm with the Vail Village Urban Dcsign Considerations. A rninirnurn of a
l0-foot offset shall be pnrvided.
The Vail Road and South Frontage Road propcrty linc discrepancies must be resolved prior to the Board
cornmenting on the proposcd Vail Road setback. The Board is interested in cnsuring that the streetscape along
Vail Road is atfactive, wellJandscaped and inviting.
{p *""rrr"o rnro
The Vail Plaza Hotel is tentatively scheduled for a third conceptual review by the Desip Review Board on
Wednesday, November 3, 1999. In order to remain on the Board's agenda you will need to submit revisions by no
later than noon, Thursday, October 28, 1999 to the Community Development Departrnent.
I hope this ietter is helpful in clarifoing the Board's comments. Should you have any questions or concems, please
feel free to call. You can reach me by telephone at 479-2145.
Sincerelv.
IJ-r*n- R,'o*,
George Ruther-, AICP
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Xc: Vail Town Council
Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission
Waldir hado
/
A.
B.
.l E H tt E,\-
Ai!t,/ A:isi.,(,t,{ I [5, I i'.,,
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
(jeorge:
This is a written description of off-site inpacts and their proposed mitigation as requested by your letter
dated l0/13/99.
C.
Pedestrian Impacts -Vail Road. We will be providing sffeetscape improvements in accordance
with the streetscape master plan for the eastem side of Vail Road from the corner of East Meadow
Drive to the northem most property line of our site. These improvenrents include new "Village"
light fixtures and standards, curb and gutter, and a six-foot wide brick paver sidewalk to match the
color, pattern, and size of the existing sidewalk at East Meadow Drive., Additional landscape
improvements and final sidewalk conliguration will be provided in accordance with design review
zoning regulations.
Pedestrian Impacts - East Meadow Drive. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape lmprovements in accordance with the streetscape master plan for the northem side of
East Meadow Drive fiom the corner of Vail Road to the westemmost of the Vail Viilage lnn Pirase
IA structure to mitigate pedestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements include
replacement of the existing cube fixtures with new "Village" light fixtures and standards and a srx-
foot wide brick paver sidewalk to match the color, pattem, and size of the existing sidervalk at the
comer of East lVleadow Drive and Vail Road. Additional landscape improvements and irnal
sidewalk configuration will be provided in accordance with design revidw zoning regulations.
Pedestrian Impacts - South Frontage Roatl. 'fhe Vail Plaza llotel is proposing to provide
streetscape lmprovements in accordance rvith the master plan lbr the southem side of the South
Frontage Road tiom the comer of Vail Road to the westerrunost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase
V dlivervay to mitiuate petlestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements inch rde nerv
"Village" li-sht fl.\tures and standards. curb and gutter. and a six-foot rvide bricl< paver sider.valk trr
Iuiitcir the color. pattcri.i. and size ol'the erisrinc sidervalk aI alonq thc South Fronlace ltoad.
.\cidiirorlal landscape improvelueuts lnd linul srdewaik conirgurarion rvrll be provrdcd ur
accordance rvith desigrr revierv and other apphcable zoning regulations as ivell as Colorado
Department of fransportation.
Petlestrian Impacts - South Frontage Road. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape improvements in accordance with the master plan ibr the southem side of the South
Frontage Road from the eastemmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase V driveway to the
westemmost comer of East Meadow Drive (Crossroads) to mitigate pedestrian impacts in this area.
The proposed improvements include white concrete standard curb and gutter. and a six-foot wide.
four-inch thick, reinforced. white concrete sidervalk. These improvements specifically exclude
utilily relocation. engineered skuctures for retai:iing earth or support of the sidewalk. handrails,
1kr.l1t ii:1 li.-l<t 'i;l ,\:\ilii.:t,,tj,.il-!:!i11.rii.r.L,.\)jljl)r-,-\i.1 ,\i<[.] llli.1..fl- i,i
D.
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Zebreu and Associates. Inc.
10t19/99
I
guardrails, or walls meant to provide for the safety ofpedestrians on the sidewalk, and/or drainage
systems meant to control surface water runoff. It is assumed that the items specifically excluded
will be provided by another entily to be coordinated with the proposed sidewalk. Additionally it is
assumed that all improvements along the South Frontage Road will be at the discretion of the
Colorado Department of Transportation.
Public Transportation Impacts - East Meadow Drive. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to
provide public transportation infrastructure improvements in accordance with the streetscape
master plan for a new bus stop adjacent to the westemmost portion of the Vail Village Inn Phase
[A structure to mitigate impacts in this area. The prooosed improvements relocation of fixed bus
signage and fixtures, and a bus stop similar in size, materiais and character to the existing bus stop
located on the south side of the roadway. Additional landscape improvements and final
configuration will be provided in accordance with design review and other applicable zoning
resulations.
It is our understanding that the existing surface water runoff from the existing structures and the proposed
structures on the site is would be in the same quantities and would drain to the same locations as currently
exist. Additionally, we would assume no increase in surface water on our site would occur from the design
of proposed drainage stuctures on the South Frontage Road. Therefore would assume that no major
drainage infrasbucfure improvements would be necessary to accommodate the proposed structures.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
-l-*-- Il- --
Tim Losa
Proj ect Manager
Zehren and Associates. Inc.
z E ll R I f-.j
\ i.i t__r .\-(S(i(.1/\f [,i li..j(
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Developmen t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
George:
This a final written statement as requested by your letter dated 10/13199 to address design criteria A
through I as outlined in section 18.40.080 of the town code. It is our understandine that these nine (9)
criteria are to be used in evaluating the merits of the Vail Plaza Hotel, the final phasi of tfre Tiil-hf-age
hn Special Development District.
Design Compatibility. We believe that lhe hotel is designed in such a way tl'rat is both compatible and
sensitive to the environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties.
Setbacks are consistent with the underllng zoning in that they maintain an average of twenty feet
(20') from most adjacent properties to the primary building walls. Additionally, the structure maintains
setbacks consistent with adjacent properties along both the Frontage Road and Vail Road.
Mass and bulk are sensitive to adj acent structures in that the hotel is designed to step up in height
and bulk from both the sheet and adjacent smaller shuctures in order to maintain a comforlable
pedestrian scale while maintaining consistent heights with adjacent struchlres roof lines and ridges.
Additionally, we have purposeflrlly hipped most of the roof forms at or along public streets and plazas
to provide a consistent bulk plane at street level. The stepping and broken ridge lines, along with
variations in materials and wall planes act to break down the overall mass and bulk of tl're project and
relate the hotel to the surrounding neighborhood.
The alchitectural design is meant to be both compatible rvith both thc Gateway buiiding and the
remainder of the special development district while providing some identity to the botel as both a
recognizable and viable commercial slructure within the community.
Uses. Densitv, antl Activitl'. The Vail Plaza Hotel is the last phase ol'the Vail Village Lrn Special
Developuent District ancl as such rvas alrvays nteaut to be lhe anchor or lnost denselv developed
oot'ticrn rlt the districl. .\s a firll sen ice lrotel. l hich includes conl'erence. ,spra. restaurant. ancl
cl)lllmerclai actlvitles, the hotcl nreaul to act as a "rrtagnet'' thaf dr alvs people thror-rgh the other
smaller, commcrcial based stnrcturcs in thc special developn-rent district, (including tire Gaterval'
burlding). Additionally. the hotel is legally required to provide loading and delivery seruices,
autornobilc' access, and parking fbr the lemaindel of the special developrnent distnct.
Parking and Loading. We believe our parking and loading facilities are in compliance with the
requirements of chapter i 8.52.
We are providing six (6), 12' x 25'x 14' underground loading berths. The maximum required is
five (5) 12' x 25' berths in accordance v/ith 18.52.150. We believe our parking facilities meet required
number of spaces required by zoning chapter 1 8.52.
,\f,,(.i {'tr 'l i ,iit .llt .\i.li.tii\ri jili,ii iti.,ii!!i,\il_):(_\pl:,\f{clrlltt_ii,iit-
L.
Pl-), B()\ iir, i; " -,(ir'r. (",;ir;r.r:irr tili'l{,r r r,jr;!;j ir.i'/.i.jt 1
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/19/99
D. Conformity rvith Nlaster Plan. We believe our development substantially complies with the goals
expressed in the various plans contained within the adopted Vail Vitlage Master Plan.
Tlrc Land Use Plan indicates our site as Medium/High Density Residential and as such
recommends a lodging orientation with a limited amount of accessory retail.
We are proposing to provide an increased amount of "urban open space" or public plaza and
buffering greenspace in the areas indicated as such in The Open Space Plan.
We believe that our project complies with the recommendations in The Parking and Circalation
Plan. We are proposing an intemal connection to the Vail Gateway shared pedestriar/auto area as
indicated, an improved pedesbian connection to East Meadow Drive including new bus facilities as
indicated, and a secondary extemal pedestrian connection to Vail Road between phase five and our
project. Additionally we would be providing sidewalk improvements from the new bus stop on East
Meadow Drive to the Gateway on Vail Road, and BikelPedesbian sidewalk improvements from the
Vail Gateway to the Vail Transportation Center on the Frontage Road.
We believe that our design substantially complies with Building Height Plan in that the plan
indicates buildings offive stories both to the east and west of our site along the frontage road and north
and south of our site on Vail Road. Our design maintains this four to five story relationship with our
neighbors. We feel as though the three to four story designation is inconsistent with current conditions
and are not applicable as they relate to our site. It is our understanding that these heights indicated in
the plan were based on preserving views to Vail Mountain from the four way stop at the Intersection of
Vail Road and the Frontage Road prior to development of the Vail Gateway and the Roundabouts.
Because these views no longer exist with the development of the Vail Gateway as acknowledged in the
plan, and because stopping to view the nrountain is achrally discouraged by the movement of haffic in
the roundaboul we feel that these standards may no longer apply.
The Actiott P/az indicates our site as an area for potential residential/lodging infill in accordance
with previous town approvals with which our proposed project is consistent.
The Vail Village Sub-Areas 1-1 of the Vail Yillage Master P/an indicates our site as the final
phase of SDD #6. kr doing so, it identifies a series of goals, which we believe we comply with.
Itetn 1.2 €ncourages "the upgrading and redevelopment of residentiai and commercial facilities."
Item 2.3 "strongly encourages the development short term accommodation units" and recog:rizes that
when units are "developed above the existing density levels, they should be managed in such a way
that allows for short term overnight rental".
Item 2.4 encourages the development of new commercial infill compatible with existing land uscs.
Item 2.6 encourages the development ol affordable housing units and may be required as part of arry
redevelopment project requesting a densify over levels allowed by existing zoning.
Itent 3.2 recognizes the rvill to "reduce vehiculal trafllc in the village to the greatest extent possible".
Iletn 1.1 encotlrages the improvement ol existing open space ro creare ner,v plazas with greenspace.
[tettt 5.1 rect,'gnizes thc treetl arrd ,-lesilc to plor,irJe ti;r parkrnu demands on sitc antl rr,ith rindergrouurl
eutl rrs uall;, concealed patl\lnq.
Item 6.1 recognizes the need to provide sen'ice and delivery lacilities lbr existrng and nerv
development.
E. Natural Hazards. We believe there are no natural hazards that may affect development of this site.
F. Site and Building Design. We believe rve have addressed this issue by compliance with the Vail
Viilage Master Plan.
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Zehren and Associates, lnc.
to/t9/99
U.
H.
Pedestrian/Vehicular Circulation. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance with the
Vail Village Master Plan. Additionally, traffic studies indicate that vehicular circulation pattems are
considered safe and have relatively little impact on existing vehicular circulation systems.
Functional and Aesthetic Landscaping. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance
with the Vail Village Master Plan. Additionally, we believe we have substantially improved on the
amount and quality of publicly accessible plazas, greenspaces, and pedestrian circulation systems.
Phasing Plan. The development will be constructed in one phase with completion anticipated for late
fall of200l.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concems regarding the information presented.
Additionally, if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
-r - -t| * ---+---"
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
/: F: ll t?. r: i' j
,.\ l'.r L) A:i5{.}(-t,\ f E5, I i.r'
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
PEC/DRB Comments
George:
This is a written description responding to each of the issues raised by both the Design Review Board and
the Planning and Environmental Commission as outlined in you letter. dated l0/13/99.
Vail Road Setback.
It is our intention that the proposed struchres along Vail Road both be consistent with other structures
located along Vail Road and meets the "spirit" of the zoning requirements specifying setbacks. The
existing slreetscape is one in which the majority of stuchues along Vail Road maintain an east-west
orientation along their primary roof ridges with their sheet frontage at a maintaining a north-south
orientation creating a non-uniform setback along Vail Road. Additionally, the buildings siep up in height
from south to north as they approach the Frontage Road. ln the desigrr of the Vail Plaza Hotel we have
tried to maintain a similar orientation, setbacks, and height relationships along Vail Road.
In order to maintain the "spirit" of the zoning we have attempted to maintain an average setback of twenty
feet to the primary building walls at Vail Road exclusive of one story architectural projections. In
exarnining our setbacks lion'r Vail Road, we have calculated the followins:
1'he one-story portions of the shucture are non-habitable, non-encloscd, architectural projections added tbr
visual interest antl meant to enhance the pedestnan streetscape. For this reason they were excluded liom
the average setback calculation. Chapter 18.58 addresscs similar architectural projections that may extend
into the required setbacks.
The public benefit most specifically assocrated with this deviation fi'om the underlyrng zoning is an
enhanced pedestrian streetscape along Vail Road. Additionally, public receives an increased number of
short-term o'emisht *'":'ffl,1]i:l,Tl]::::::'"ifx
Iil:::,::,i:,::1":*.T;i,:llli' '-"
o
Average Property
Line Setback
Averase Curb Setback 'Total Lensth of Walls
One Story Frontage 9'-9"11' i'l 66'-6"
'f'hree Story Frontage l8'-9"JZ -+74',-0"
Four Story Fronta.qe 2 t '-0"31 '-8"41' -tr"
I , \,,'crase Setback (3 & -l skrri,
I areas only)
I !)'-3"ll I '-{r"
/
o Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Zehren and Associates. inc.
t0/t9/99
Buildine Heieht
Great care was given to ensure the residential units and commercial entries located within the Gateway
plaza receive direct sunlight. This was the primary concem at the time when the side setback was
increased the building height lowered from the previous proposal to the current proposal. The lowest levei
of residential units located on level three of the Gateway Plaza receive direct sunlight at 12:00 noon on
December 21, the day at which the sun is at the lowest point in the sky. The ground floor commercial
entries adj acent to Vail Road also receive direct sunlight from 12:00 noon on December 21 due to the fact
that the proposed sbuchrre steps down and to the east at Vail Road. Additionally, because the opening
between the existing Gateway Plaza and the proposed hotel face west, the amount of direct sunlight
increases on the Gateway Plaza as the sun sets in the day.
Any negative impacts due to the length of the proposed ridge would not substantially benefit the Gateway.
Breaks in the ridge wouid provide only a narrow slots of direct sunlight to pass to the Gateway that woul<l
move across the fagade as the sun moves across the sky. These slots of light, intense differences between
light and dark areas would induce glare and may b€ an undesired effect on lower portions of the Gateway.
The perceived building height adjacent to the Gateway Plaza will be forty-five feet, the same unintemrpted
wall height as allowed by underlying zoning for flat roofed stuctures. This is due to the fact that the eave
is located at an elevation of 210' and the adjacent gradc is located at an eievation of 165'. The distance
between the structures does not allow enough distance to perceive the proposed hotel ridge liom any point
between the two structures at ground level. Additionally, projections from the primary buiiding wail,
planters and lower floors step to break up the perceived mass of the wall.
Circulation
The hotel entrance at East Meadow Drive has been re-oriented to address some of the commissioner's
comments regarding the width and nature of the hotel entry. This area will continue to be studied for
additional resolutions to the issues raised.
The circulation path between the proposed hotel and Vail Village lnn Phase V has been redesigned to
provide for an improved pedeskian experience.
The space between Vail Village lnn Phase III has been redesigned to create a linear "finger" park betrveen
the strucfutes that will connect proposed pedestrian circuiation systems located at the north and south
portions of the site.
The pool area adjacent to the southem plaza has beert redesrgnccl to urcorporate a series of stepped
retaining rvalls. pools ar-rd seating areas. l'.[o conlinuous *'nlls over tlve teet iu hcighr e:,rst c.",cept at tite
e,Ktl'eltic uorthwest corner of the pool. Raiirngs ltave been reduced lo stonL' bollarcls and more transparent
steel railings and balusters to reduce the apparent height of ',valls. Poois cascade ti'om one level to another
plovidiug "white noise" that may alleviate any concems over noise. Sunishade studies have been provided
to help alleviate any concerns over sunlight in the area.
The plaza south of Building B has been redesigned to increase the restaurant fiontage, architechrrally
identifu the entry area through both piaza configuration and building elevation, and identi$ clear
circulation paths.
Vail Plaza Hotel Zehren and Associates, Inc.961070.00 l}/tgtgg
Circulation (continued)
Every effort will be made to encourage property owners within the district to upgrade their properties
especially with regard to surface paving materials.
Buildine Entrance
The porte-cochere and hotel entry on Vail Road has been reconfigured to address the commissioner's
conxnents regarding the pedestrian experience and sense of enty to the hotel. The sidewalk configuration
at the north side of the site adjacent to the Gateway has been revised and incorporated into the design of
the enbry area.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments regarding the information presented
or any additional materials that you may need in writing your report.
Sincerely,
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates. lnc.
To: George Ruther
From: Greg Hall
Date: October 19' 1999
Subject: Vail Plaza Hotel
I have reviewed the latest submittal of the Vail Plaza Hotel and have the following
comments that will need to be addressed.
l.The site plan layout should be conected to reflect the survey provided. The curb
shown for the frontage road is actually the pan and the existing curb is 2' further
towards the site. This reduces the landscape area by the 2' width and also
compromises the ability to tum out.
The curb line on Vail road is inaccurate as well, with the existing curb closer to the
building as is shown, this is most pronounced at the gateway property line. The width
of Vail road will need to drawn correctly as the width is 28' at Phase 5 not 36' as
shown.
The loading and delivery schsme will need to address the vehicles we had previously
stated which included placement of the following AASHTO design vehicles, l,
WB6o semi (65' long) offof the travel way, The current configuration does not allow
for this vehicle to maneuver into the space. If it does park in the lane for the loading
and delivery it will block access out and may cause cars to exit the wrong way which
is a very dangerous situation.
The ability to maneuver and park:
2, WB-40 sernis (50 feet long) the WB-40 cannot use the drive lane as drawn.
3, SU-30 single unit trucks.(30' long).
In addition the hash system will need to be identified and its operation shown
independently ofthe loading and delivery operation. The previous underground
tunnel to the other phases ofthe plan has been rernoved. It should be reinstated.
The site plan needs to show the maneuvers of the 40' over the road coaches.
Provide the site improvernents discussed previously and show these. Curb gutter and
walk to crossroads, including street lights, improvements to the bus stop and E
Meadow drive, sheet lighting consistent with the village streetscape lights,
landscaped median to the frontage road, any necessary drainage improvements
associated with the offsite improvements. The material and extent of these
improvernents will be discussed once shown.
The parallel roadway scheme is inconsistent with the adjacent improvements of the
frontage road. It creates a hole and additional asphalt in an area where the goal is to
lessen the visual affect of asphalt not increase it. This will need to be studied once
the driveway and site plan are corrected to meet the suvey and standards to
determine the affects of the frontage road and roundabout operations. How will we
4.
5.
6.
ensure one way operation? Left tums out may be prohibited. It will need to be
approved by the state DOT for an access permit.
9. This access is inconsistent with the driveway standards for commercial developments.
The minimum angle with the frontage road is 70 degrees or a variance from 90 of 20
degrees. This must be held for 30' before the drive can angle greater than allowed.
Since this driveway does not meet these standards additional restrictions on the access
of the operations will be required to prohibit left turns in and out. A landscaped
median will need to be provided to accomplish this.
10. This plan also moves the access 40' closer to the roundabout where the concern of
rear end accidents is an issue.
I l. The driveways will need to provide for adequate sight distance of l0' by 250' sight
triangles measured back from the flow line of the roadway.
12.The driveways will need to provide 8' wide concrete pans.
13. The drive beyond the pans can onlybe at a maximum of 4% forthe first 30'.
14. This developmant will need to address the offsite roadway impacts that have been
applied to new approvals in the Lionshead area this equates to approximately $3788
for each additional unit, the town has then paid 20% ofthis fee. The Conference area
and Spa will require additional payment, but it is not known at this time. Some of the
offsite improvernents may be credited against this dollar amount ( the landscape
median beyond the site, and depending on how employee traffic numbers and parking
spaces are provided or not the sidewalk to Village Center Chute).
15. The close proximity of the west exit driveway to the driveway of the gateway is an
issue. The right out and gateway left out tuming movernents with little separation for
allowing reaction time is a safety issue.
16. The shading of the walks and the need to heat the walks and drives will be required.
17. The width of the walk on Vail road will need to be 8' per the Vail Streetscape plan
and with what exists. The width of the walk along the frontage road is 6 '. The walks
are to be heated paver walks along all ofthe SDD boundaries. Beyond the boundaries
match existing or provide concrete.
18. The alignment of the walk along the frontage road will need to be better designed to
avoid vegetation and remove the huge curve at the east property line where it crosses
the exit driveway.
19. Please address the impacts during construction.
20. The requirsment to provide the access to the condos to the east drives a lot of this
design. It appears that they have access and providing them access but not
convenient access does it meet their requirements? Are the two parking structures
connected as required by the original SDD? The will need to be connected to allow
vehicles to flow form one to the other.
21. The grading plan will need to show spot elevations to the nearest tenth ofa foot along
the length of the road way frontage and whsre adjacent properties are met.
22.T\e plan needs to show existing and adjacent vegetation being impacted.
,-I
MEMoRANpuM FIL E C0PY
TO: Planning and EnvironmentalCommission
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: October25.1999
SUBJECT: A request for a worksession to discuss a major amendment to Special
Development District #6, Vail Village Inn, to allow for a hotel redevelopment within
Phase lV, located at 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M' N' & O, Block 5-D' Vail
Village First Filing.
Applicant: Waldir Prado, Daymer CorporationPlanner: George Ruther
I. INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Waldir Prado, represented by Jay Peterson, is proposing a major amendment to
Special Development District #6, Vail Village lnn. The malor amendment is intended to facilitate
the redevelopment of the existing Vail Village Inn, Phase lV Condominiums and allow for the
construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel. The current proposal amends Phase lV of the Vail Village
lnn Plaza only. No amendments are proposed to Phases l-lll or V of the Vail Village Inn.
The purpose of the worksession meeting is to:
. continue discussions on the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel,o pf€sent the revised parking plan, off-site improvements plan, loading/delivery proposal
and the vehicle circulation plan to the Planning & Environmental Commission and the
community,. inform the Planning & Environmental Commission of the issues discussed between the
applicant and the Design Review Board on October 20, 1999, andr forurard direction and input on the various aspects of the proposal to the applicant.
During the previous two worksession meetings, the applicant and the Commission have
discussed employee housing requirements, the proposed development standards and deviations
and site planning issues. Staff recommends that the following issues be discussed in
anticipation of a final review and recommendation by the Planning & Environmental Commission
on Monday, November 8, 1999:
. Parking Plan. Loading/Delivery Plan. Off-site lmprovements Plan. Tratfic Circulation
DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicant is proposing a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail
Village Inn. The purpose of the major amendment is to amend the approved development plan
to allow for the construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel in Phase lV of the District.
The Vail Plaza Hotel is intended to be a mixed-use development. Uses within the hotel include
residential, commercial and recreation. The applicant is proposing to construct 97
accommodation units (hotel rooms), 47 part-time fractional fee club units, and 1 free-market
condominium. The fractional lee club units are to be considered palt time, as during the summer
months the hotel will retain ownership of the units to rent as short-term accommodation units,
and then during the winter months the units will be sold as fractional fee club units. The Vail
Plaza Hotel also includes two restaurants, 3,820 square feet of accessory retail located within the
hotel, a 15,338 square foot conference facility, a 20,355 square foot full service spa and health
cfub facility and approximately 247 new underground parking spaces.
tII. BAGKGROUND
The following is a summary of the existing phases and development with the Vail Village Inn
Special Development District:
Phase l-This phase consists of the buildings located at the southeast corner of the
District. Phase I includes one residential drrvelling unit approximately 3,927 square feet in
size and nine commercial/retail spaces.
Phase ll -This phase consists of three residential dwelling units totaling approximately
3,492 square feet in size and three commercial/retail spaces. Phase ll is generally
located in the center of the District.
Phase lll -This Phase consists of twenty-nine residential dwelling units totaling
approximately 44,830 square feet in size and six commercial/retail spaces. Phase lll is
located at the northeast corner of the District.
Phase lV - This is the original and oldest Phase in the District. This Phase consists of
one residential dwelling unit approximately 5,000 square feet in size and seventy-two
accommodation units comprising approximately 16,585 square feet of floor area. Phase
lV is generally located in the northwest corner of the District.
Phase V - This Phase consists ol eleven residential dwelling units and three
accommodation units totaling approximately 9,972 square feet of floor area and four
commercial/retail spaces. Phase V is located in the southwest corner of the District at
the intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive.
A map illustrating the location of the various Phases has been attached {or reference.
The following is a brief summary of the amendments to Special Development District No. 6 since
the original adoption:
. In 1976, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 7, Series 1976, establishing
Special Development Districts No. 6, Vail Village Inn, to ensure the unified and
coordinated development of a critical site to the Town of Vail, as a whole, and in a
manner suitable for the area in which it is situated.
In 1985, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 1, Series 1985, providing certain
amendments to the approved development plan for Special Development District No. 6.
The amendments included a requirement for a minimum of 175 accommodation units and
72,400 square feet of GRFA devoted entirely to accommodation units in Phase lV.
In 1987, the VailTown Councilpassed Ordinance No.14, Series 1987, which amended
and modified Section 8 relating to the allowed density of the development plan for Special
Development District No. 6. This amendment broke Phase lV into two distinct phases;
Phase lV and Phase V. This amendment established the maximum allowable GRFA for
the entire District at approximately 120,000 square feet. Further, the amendment
reduced the minimum accommodation unit requirement to 148 units and 67,367 square
feet of GRFA.
In 1989, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No.24, Series of 1989, amending the
density controls of the District. This amendment increased the allowable GRFA to
124,527 square feet and allowed Unit #30 to be created in a commercial space. The
amendment maintained the previous approval requiring a minimum 148 accommodation
units and 67,367 square feet of GHFA devoted to units in Phases lV and V.
ln 1991, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 9, Series 1991 , providing lor
certain amendments to the approved development plan for Special Development District
No. 6, which relates specifically to Phase lV.
In 1992, the VailTown Councilpassed Ordinance No.2, Series 1992, allowing for
modifications and amendments to various sections ol Special Development District No. 6
which related directly to Phase lV, and which made certain changes to the approved
development plan for Special Development District No. 6 as they relate to Phase lV.
When originally considering deviations from the underlying zoning in 1976, the Town Council
found that such deviations were acceptable as the community was to realize a substantial
increase in the hotel bed base. An increase in short-term accommodations has been a long
standing oblectivd of our resort community.
According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the applicant's property is zoned Public
Accommodation. Pursuant to the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Public Accommodation Zone
district is intended,
" to provide sites for lodges and residential accommodations for visitors, together
with such public and semi-public facilities and limited professional offices, medical
facilities, private recreation, and related visitor oriented uses as may appropriately
be located in the same district. The Public Accommodation District is intended to
ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with
lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable resort qualities of the District by
establishing appropriate site development standards. Additional nonresidential uses
are permitted as conditional uses which enhance the nature of Vail as a winter antl
summer recreation and vacation community, and where permitted are intended to
function compatibly with the high density lodging character of the District.
The Public Accommodation Zone District is intended to provide sites for lodging units with
densities not to exceed 25 dwelling units per acre. The Public Accommodation Zone District,
prior to January 21, 1997, did not permit interval ownership. On January 21, 1997, the Town
Council adopted regulations allowing interval ownership subject to the issuance of a conditional
use permit. Previously, interval ownership was only allowed as a conditional use in the High
density MultFlamily Zone District.
On October 5, 1999, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1 999,
amending the development standards prescribed in the Public Accommodation Zone District.
The amendments included an increase in allowable GRFA up to 150%, an increase in site
coverage, the elimination of AU's and FFU's in the calculation of density, revised setback
requirements, and other various aspects in the development of properties zoned Public
Accommodation. The allowable building height, landscape area and limitation on commercial
square footage remained unchanged.
IV. ZONING ANALYSIS
The development standards for a Special Development District shall be proposed by the
applicant. Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density
coirtrol, site coverage, landscaping and parking and loading shall be determined by the Town
Council as part of the approved development plan, with consideration of the recommendations of
the Planning and Environmental Commission. Before the Town Council approves development
standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it shall be determined that such
deviations provide benefits to the Town that outweigh the effects of such deviations. This
determination is to be made based upon the evaluation of the proposed Special Development
District's compliance with the Review Criteria outlined in the following section-
The Community Development Department staff has prepared a Zoning Analysis for the proposed
Vail Plaza Hotel. The Zoning Analysis compares the development standards outlined by the
underlying zoning of Public Accommodation (revised), to the existing development, the
applicant's proposed 1998 major amendment and the 1999 major amendment. lt is important to
note that the comparison is based on the entire area of the Special Development District.
A copy of the anallsis has been attached for reference.
For comparative purposes, the Community Development Department has also completed an
analysis comparing the 1998 proposal to the current 1999 proposal. The purpose of the analysis
is to-provide a direct comparison of the 1998 proposal that was rejected by the Vail Town Council
to the applicant's revised proposal.
A copy of the analysis has been attached for reference.
V. THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRIGT MAJOR AMENDMENT PROCESS
Chapter 12-9 of the Town Code provides for the amendment of existing Special Development
Districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose of a Special
Development District is,
'To encourage flexibility and creatlvlty ln the development of land, in order to
promote its most appropriate use; to improve the desiign character and quality ol
the new development within the Town; to tacilitate the adequate and economical
provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open
spacs areas; and to further the ovsrall goals of the community as stated in the Vail
Gomprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development
District, in coniunction with the properties underlying zone district, shall establish
the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the
Special Development District."
According to Section 12-gA-2,a major amendment to a Special Development District is defined
as,
"Any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the
number of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any
approved special development district (other than "minor amendments" as delined
in this Section), except as provided under Sections 12-15-4, "lnterior Gonversions",
or 12-15-5, "Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance)" of this Title."
The Town Code provides a framework for the amendment of a Special Development District.
According to the Town Code, prior to site preparation, building construction, or other
improvements to land within a Special Development District, there shall be an approved
development plan for the Special Development District. The approved development plan
establishes requirements regulating development, uses and activity within the Special
Development District.
Upon final review of a proposed major amendment of an existing Special Development District, a
report from the Planning and Environmental Commission stating its findings and
recommendations and a staff report shall be forwarded to the Town Council, in accordance with
the provisions listed in Section 12-16-6 ol the Town Code. The Town Council's consideration of
the Special Developmenl District shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Town Code
and approved by two readings of an ordinance.
An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses, and
activities of the Special Development District. The development plan shall contain all relevant
material and information necessary to establish the parameters with which the Special
Development District shall adhere. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to:
the approved site plan; floor plans, building sections, and elevations: vicinity plan; parking plan;
preliminary open space/landscape plan; densities; and permitted, conditional, and accessory
uses.
The determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning
and Environmental Commission and Town Council as part of the formal review of the proposed
development plan. Unless further restricted through the review of the proposed Special
Development District, permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be limited to those
permitted, conditional and accessory uses in the property's underlying zone district.
The Town Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in
evaluating the merits ol the proposed major amendment to a Special Development District. lt
shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed
development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more
A.
of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been
achieved. The nine SDD review criteria below:
Design compatlblllty and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood
and adiacent propertles relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height,
buffer zones, identlty, character, visual integrity and orientation.
Uses, activity and density which provide a compatlble, etficient and workable
relationshlp wlth surrounding uses and actlvlty.
Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Ghapter 12'10 of
the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Contormity with the applicable elements of the Vail Gomprehensive Plan' Town
policies and Urban Design Plan.
fdentitication and mitigation of natural andlor geologic hazards that aftect the
property on which the specialdevelopment district is proposed.
Site plan, buiHing design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functlonal development respOnSive and sensltive to natural features,
vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
A circulatlon system designed for both vehlcles and pedestrians addresslng on and
oft-site traff lc circulation.
Functional and aesthetac landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
presen e natural features, recreation, views and functions.
Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and
efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development
distrlct.
vt. prscussroN rssuEs
The Town of Vail statf has completed a preliminary review ol the plans submifted for the
redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn. Upon the completion of our review, which included input
and analysis from Jeff Winston of Winston & Associates, the Town's urban design consultant, a
number of issues with regard to the proposal have been identified. The Community Development
Department would recommend that the Planning & Environmental Commission, the stall and the
applicant engage in a dialogue on the issues that have been identified. The purpose of the
discussion is not to resolve each of the issues at the meeting. Instead, the purpose of the
discussion is to continue the dialogue and provide an opportunity for all interested parties to have
their issues and concerns heard.
Parkino Plan
The parking requirements for the redevelopment of Phase lV, Vail Village Inn are prescribed. the
Zoniirg Regutations. Section 1 2-10-1 0 of the Zoning Regulations outlines the off-street parking
requir6meit based upon the differing types of uses proposed. For example, an accommodation
c.
D.
E.
F.
G.
units requires 0.4 spaces per units, plus 0.1 space per 100 square feet 0f gross residential lloor
area, with a maximum of 1 space per unit.
In addition to the parking requirement outlined in the regulations, there is an additional
requirement for parking in Special Development District No. 6. Pursuant to the approved
development plan, the redevelopment of Phase lV shall be required to provide 75 parking spaces
to meet a deficit parking situation within the District.
The Town of Vail is currently in the process of studying parking generation within the Town's two
commercial core areas. The purpose of the study is to determine the approprialeness of the
existing parking requirements for the various qpes of uses and to propose amendments if
necessary to the parking schedule if necessary.
For comparative purposes, the staff has evaluated the parking requirement for the Vail Plaza
Hotel based upon the current regulations and the recommended rates proposed as a result of the
parking study.
Parking Bequirement (existing regulations)
Use
Dwelling Unit 'l
Accommodation Unit 97
Fractional Fee Club Unit 47
Conference
Restaurant
Retail
Parkino Spaces
2.5
74.9
95
43.2
23.2
12.7
254 (x 5olo reduction for mulitple use (12) )
-12
- 42 (existing spaces to remain)
200
75
70
345 parking spaces
Parkino Soaces
1.1
97
47
86
ZOS 1no multiple use credit applies)
- 42 (existing spaces to remain)
227
75
70
372 parking spaces
Existing Deficit
Existing Spaces
Parking
Use
Dwelling Unit 1
Accommodation Unit 97
Fractional Fee Club Unit 47
Conference
Restaurant
Retail
Existing Deficit
Existing Spaces
Grand Total
Requlrement (recommended changes)
Quantitv
Quantitv
10,368 sq.ft.
5,678 sq.ft.
3,820 sq.ft.
Subtotal
10,368 sq.ft.
5,678 sq.ft.
3,820 sq.ft.
Subtotal
Grand Total
The applicant is proposing a total of 289 parking spaces. Two hundred, forty-seven parking
spaces are provided in two levels of an underground parking structure accessed off Vail Road.
Forty-two spaces are existing in lhe structure underneath the Phase lll Condominium Building
and they are accessed off the South Frontage Road. Of the 289 parking spaces, 106 are valet
spaces, 7 are compact spaces and the remaining 176 are full-sized spaces. The applicant has
proposed short-term temporary spaces located at the front entrance to the hotel. since these
spaces are temporary in nature, and not intended for long-term parking, they can not count
towards meeting the overall parking requirement.
Due to the multi-use nature of the hotel, the multiple use credit permitled by section 12-10-12 ot
the Zoning Regulations shall apply. In the case of the Vail Plaza Hotel, a 5% reduction shall be
applied to the overall parking requirement for the hotel. The 5ol" reduction shall not be applied to
the 75 required spaces nor the 112 existing spaces, pursuant to the approved development plan.
Loadino/Deliverv
The Zoning Regulations outline the requirements for loading/delivery facilities. Pursuant to the
regulations, the applicant shall be required to provide a minimum of five loading and delivery
berths. The five berth requirement takes into account the multiple use credit since the proposed
facility shall serve as the sole otf-street loading and delivery area for the entire District.
Upon review of the proposed loading/delivery plan, the staff has identilied a number of issues
that must be resolved in order for the facility to function properly.
The loading/delivery plan contemplates access to the site off the South Frontage Road. In order
to gain access and provide maneuvering capabilities without intenupting the tratfic flow on the
South Frontage Road the applicant is proposing to construct an additional lane parallel to the
South Frontage Road. A portion of the additional lane will be constructed on the applicant's
property and a portion will be constructed in the CDOT right-of-way. During a recent Town
Council update on the status of the development review process for the hotel, several Council
members expressed concerns with the current proposal. Of greatest concern was that the
parallel access road scheme was inconsistent with the improvements on adjacent properties
along the South Frontage Road. The Town is currently considering South Frontage Road
improvements to lessen the negative visual impacts of the vast amount of asphalt in the area.
The applicant's current proposal increases lhe amount of asphalt. Additionally, safely concerns
were raised regarding large delivery vehicles attempting to cross multiple lanes of traffic to head
westbound on the South Frontage Road (lefttum). Staff anticipates that a right-turn only from
the loading/delivery area will be required. Staff further anticipates the need to construct a
landscape median east of the roundabout to prohibit left turns from the hotel site.
The access to and from the loading/delivery area does not comply with the Town's adopted
driveway standards for commercial developments. The entrance and exit driveway angles do not
meet minimum standards. Failure to meet minimum standards results in unsafe situations and
the possible need to implement restrictions on turning movements. This issue must be
addressed.
The loadingidelivery facility must be designed to AASHTO standards. The current configuration
does not permit adequate maneuvering for the q/pes of vehicles delivering goods to the District.
The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer and shall be granted a
revised access permit by CDOT.
The applicant is proposing to use the loading/delivery area to accommodate the occasional
passenger coach bus arriving at the hotel. In order to determine if the area can accommodate
the maneuvering requirements of the coach bus, the site plan needs to show the turning
requirements of a 40 foot bus. The front drop-off area on Vail Road can not accommodate a bus
as designed.
A copy of a memorandum from Greg Hall to George Ruther, dated October 19, 1999, has been
attached for reference.
Off-site lmprovements
fn accordance with Section 12-7A-14 of the Zoning Regulations, the applicant is required to
mitigate substantial oftsite impacts resulting from the proposed redevelopment. Pursuant to
Section 12-74-14,
"Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts
of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation shall bear a
reasonable relation to the development impacts. lmpacts may be determined based
on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public
amenity improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevelopment and will
be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission in review of
development proiects and conditional use permits. Substantial off-site impacts may
include, but are not limited to, the following: deed restricted employee housing,
roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape
improvements, stream tracvbank restoration, loading/delivery, public art
improvements, and similar improvements. The lntent of this section is to only
require mitigation lor large scale redevelopmenUdevelopment proiects which
produce substantial off-site impacts."
Attached for relerence is a copy of a letter to George Ruther, from Tim Losa, dated October 19,
1999, outlining the off-site improvements proposed by the applicant. Staff agrees in concept with
the improvements proposed. However, further discussion and greater detail will be required to
fully understand the extent and financial responsibilities of the proposed off-site improvements.
Since this is a proposal to amend an existing special development district, detailed drawings are
required to be made part of the public record. The drawings shall completely illustrate the
improvements to be constructed. Additionally, a Developer lmprovement Agreement identifying
the improvements and the financial responsibilities shall be required prior to second reading of
an amending ordinance.
Traffic Circulation
The applicant has submitted a revised Traffic Report. The report was prepared by Felsburg, Holt
& Ullevig as a supplement to the earlier Traffic lmpact Study. The following is summary of the
report:
. The currenl proposal will generate approximatelyl ,457 trips per day with a total of 85 trips
during the am peak and 127 trips during the pm peak. The current proposal will generate
approximately 50% fewer trips than the previous 'l998 major amendment proposal.
. The north driveway, adjacent to the Gateway Plaza Building should be an exit only to
maximize safety and reduce vehicles from stacking up into the roundabout.
. The south driveway, adjacent to Phase V should be entrance only and should not require a
dedicated left turn lane on Vail Road.
| "l
. Adequate sight distances need to be maintained along Vail Road to minimize potential
tuming conflicts.. The in-bound left turn lane at the South Frontage Road access to the loading/delivery area
will operate at or above Level of Service "C" (expected delays of 15 - 25 seconds) during
peak traffic periods.. The outbound traffic at the South Frontage Road exit driveway will operate at Level of
Service "E" (expected delays of 35 - 50 seconds. A relatively low volume of vehicles (<15/hr)
will be subject to these delays.r No off-site conflicts are expected between the parallel loading/delivery lane and the through
traffic on the South Frontage Road.. Neither acceleration nor deceleration lanes are required pursuant to the State Highway
Access Gode.
Staff would recommend that the applicant describe the on-site traffic flow of vehicles. Most
importantly, the applicant should describe a guest anival scenario and how the vehicles flow
throughoul the site.
VII. STAFFRECOMMENDATION
As this is only a worksession, the Community Development Department will not be forwarding a
recommendation at this time. A formal recommendation will be provided at the time of a final
review.
10
a
U
:i
TILE COPY
Vail Plaza Hotel
Attachments
(revised 10125199)
o
o
ZEllREt.,"
Al'l l) ASsr)(.tAI[5, tN'
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
George:
This is a written description of off-site impacts and their proposed mitigation as requested by your letter
dated l0/13199.
Pedestrian Impacts -Vail Road. We will be providing streetscape improvements in accordance
with the sfeetscape master plan for the eastem side of Vail Road from the corner of East Meadow
Drive to the northem most prop€rty line of our site. These improvenrents include new "Village"
light fixnres and standards, curb and gutter, and a six-foot wide brick paver sidewalk to match the
color, pattem, and size of the existing sidewalk at East Meadow Drive. Additional landscape
improvements and ftnal sidewalk configuration will be provided in accordance with design review
zoning regulations.
Pedestrian Impacts - East Meadow Drive. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape lmprovements in accordance with the streetscape master pian for the northern side of
East Meadow Drive from the corner of Vail Road to the westemmost of the Vail Village lnn Phase
[A skucture to mitigate pedestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements include
replacement of the existing cube fixtures with new "Village" light fixtures and standards and a six-
foot wide brick paver sidewalk to match the color, pattern, and size of the existing sidewalk at the
comer of East Meadow Drive and Vail Road. Additional landscape improvements and final
sidewalk configuration will be provided in accordance with desigrr revi€w zoning regulations.
Pedestrian Impacts - South Frontage Road. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape improvetncnts in accordance with the master plan for the southern side of the South
F'rontage Road from the corner of Vail Road to the westernmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase
V dlivervay to mitigate pedestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements include nerv
"Village" light {r.\tures and standards. curb and gutter', and u six-firot wide brick paver sidewalk to
ruratcir the color. patte m. and sii:e of' the c.risting sider." alk at altxg the Soutli Frorrtaqe Road.
Additional landscape itnprovements and linal side',valk contiguration rvill be provrded in
accordance with desigu rcvierv and other applicable zoning regulations as rvcll as Colorado
Department of Transportation.
Pedestrian Impacts - South Frontage Road. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape improvements in accordance rvith the master plan for the southern side of the South
Frontage Road from the easternmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase V driveway to the
westernmost comer of East Meadow Drive (Crossroads) to mitigate pedestrian impacts in this area.
The proposed improvements include white concrete standard curb and gutter. and a six-foot wide,
four-inch thick, reinforced. white concrete sidewalk. These improvements specifically exclude
utility relocation. engineered structures for retaining earth or support of the sidewalk, handrails,
,rkr. lJl il:t l1.,lit ilrl.q:{r:iti\aJ.li.rMl()lt5rt-^,,ii)tr(_,At'lAli(,i-itii.{..I.,iFll
A.
B.
D.
1,.!j B0). li:i,'tr. \.,r,rr ,. r:inr rLjr.i i.rlr,j{j ' i!l;i)l 94q-{)li; " r:,\)i,,t:{)r,r.i1r-ir-Jlt{)
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/19/99
guardrails, or walls meant to provide for the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk, and/or drainage
systems meant to control surface water runoff. It is assumed that the items specilically excluded
will be provided by another entity to be coordinated with the proposed sidewalk. Additionally it is
assumed that all improvements along the South Frontage Road will be at the discretion of the
Colorado Department of Transportation.
E. Public Transportation Impacts - East Meadow Drive. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to
provide public kansportation infrastructure improvements in accordance with the sheetscape
master plan for a new bus stop adjacent to the westemmost portion of the Vail Village Inn Phase
IA sfructure to mitigate impacts in this area. The prooosed improvements relocation of frxed bus
signage and fixtures, and a bus stop similar in size, materials and character to the existing bus stop
located on the south side of the roadway. Additional landscape improvements and final
oonfigruation will be provided in accordance with design review and other applioable zoning
regulations.
It is our understanding that the existing surface. water runoff liom the existing structures and the proposed
stuctures on the site is would be in the same quantities and would drain to the same locations as currently
exist. Additionally, we would assume no increase in surface water on our site would occur from the design
of proposed drainage stuchrres on the South Frontage Road. Therefore would assume that no major
drainage infrastuchre improvements would be necessirry to accommodate the proposed sfructures-
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
-__._lr-lj -- --_r--
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zefuen and Associates, Inc.
't
zEilR[_f..]
,r. :.j l.),\:)(,,.1,\I!:\ 1i..,
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Rr.rthdr
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
George:
This a final written statement as requested by your letter dated 10113/99 to address design criteria A
through I as outlined in section 18.40.080 of the town code. It is our understanding that these nrne (9)
criteria are to be used in evaluating the merits of the Vail Plaza Hotel, the final phase of the Vail Village
Inn Special Development District.
A. Design Compatibitity. We believe that the hotel is designed in such a way that is both compatible and
sensitive to the environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties.
Setbacks are consistent with the underlying zoning in that they maintain an average of twenty feet
(20') from most adjacent properties to the primary building walls. Additionally, the structure maintains
setbacks consistent with adjacent properties along both the Frontage Road and Vail Road.
Mass and bulk are sensitive to adj acent structures in that the hotel is designed to step up in height
and bulk from both the street and adjacent smaller structures in order to maintain a comfortable
pedestrian scale while maintaining consistent heights with adjacent structures roof lines and ridges.
Additionally, we have purposef.uliy hippcd most.of the roof forms at or along public streets and plazas
to provide a consistent bulk plane at steet level. The stepping and broken ridge lines, along with
variations in materials and wall planes act to break down the overall mass and bulk of the project and
relate the hotel to the surrounding neighborhood.
The architectural design is meant to be both cornpatible with both th€ Gateway building and the
remainder of the special development district while providing some idcntify to the hotel as both a
recognizable and viable commercial sFucture within the community.
Uses. Densit-v, and Activity. The Vail Plaza Hotel is the last phase of the Vail Village htn Special
Developmeut District and as such rvas alr.vays n'leilr'It to be lhc anchor or lrost densely developed
Dortton of the district. .\s a firil service htrtel. l hich inch-rdcs conl'erence. spa. re -sraurant. and
ccrmmercial activities, lhe lrotcl nrcilut Lo .lct irs i.l "rnagnet" titar drarvs people thlor-rulr tlie other
snraller, commercial based stnrctures in the special development district, (including tire Gaterva_v
building). Additionally. tire hotel is legally required to provide loading and clelivery serrices,
automobile access, and parking tbr the remainder of the special developrnerrt district.
Parking and Loading, We believe our parking and loading facilities are in compliance with the
requrements of chapter 1 8.52.
We are providing six (6), 12' x 25'x 14' underground loading berths. The maximum required is
tive (5) 12' x 25' berths in accordance with 18.52.150. We believe our parkins facilities meet required
number of spaces required by zon.ing chapter 18.52.
\l,i{.itliirt liri(l:.t'j ,\i.lr..iii'ri,,!i,, lt-lilt.rtit ,1.\i.ll_r!r_ript,,\l{{_lrtI[(_]Lii!:
ir.tJ. Bo' i1r, {., .,i!!r!i. {_,)i,j!:!:i i|i,11., r r,Jiijr 9.i'l i-jjr- .l:-..i;y:'r;-1; ',j-il'.it)tl(j
ts.
o L.
Vail Plaza Hotel
96 1070.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/19/99
D. Conformity with lllaster PIan. We believe our development substantially complies with the goals
expressed in the various plans contained within the adopted Vail Village Master Plan.
The Land Use Plan indicates our site as Medium/lligh Density Residential and as such
recommends a lodging orientation with a limited arnount of accessory retail.
We are proposing to provide an increased amount of "urban open space" or public plaza. and
buffering greenspace in the areas indicated as such n The Open Space Plan.
We believe that our project complies with the recommendations in The Parking and Circulation
Plan. We are proposing an intemal connection to the Vail Gateway shared pedestrian/auto area as
indicated, an improved pedestrian connection to East Meadow Drive including new bus facilities as
indicated, and a secondary extemal pedestrian connection to Vail Road between phase five and our
project. Additionaily we would be providing sidewalk improvements from the new bus stop on East
Meadow Drive to the Gateway on Vail Road, and BikelPedest-ian sidewaik improvements from the
Vail Gateway to the Vail Transportation Center on the Frontage Road.
We believe that our design substantially complies with Building Height Plan in that the plan
indicates buildings offive stories both to the east and west ofour site along the frontage road and north
and south of our site on Vail Road. Our design maintains this four to five story relationship with our
neighbors. We feel as though the three to four story designation is inconsistent with current conditions
and are not applicable as they relate to our site. It is our understanding that these heights indicated in
the plan were based on preserving views to Vail Mountain from the four way stop at the lntersection of
Vail Road and the Frontage Road prior to development of the Vail Gateway and the Roundabouts.
Because these views no longer exist with the development of the Vaii Gateway as acknowledged in the
plan, and because stopping to view the mountain is actually discouraged by the movement of haffic in
the roundabout, we feel that these standards may no longer apply.
Tlte Action P/an indicates our site as an area for potential residentiaVlodging infill in accordance
witl previous town approvals with which our proposed project is consistent.
The Vail Village Sub-Areas /-1 of the Vail Yillage Master P/an indicates our site as the final
phase of SDD #6. In doing so, it identifies a series of goals, which we believe we comply with.
Itent L2 encoulages "the upgrading and redevelopment ofresidential and commercial facilities."
Item 2.3 "strongly encourages the development short term accommodation units" and recognizes that
when units are "developed above the existing density levels, they should be managed in such a way
that allows for short term overnight rental". '
Iten 2.4 encourages the development of new commercial infill compatible witl-r existing land r.rses.
Iten 2.6 encourages the development of affordable housing units and may be required as part of any
redevelopment project requesting a density over levels allowed by existing zoning.
Itenz 3.2 recognizes the rvill to "reduce vehicular traffic in tl-re village to the greatest extent possible".
Itetn ,l.l encoufages thc irnprovement of eristlng (lpen spa!:c to create rrerv plazas with grccuspace.
[tettt 5. I recognizes tl]e trc'rtl iurd rlesilc lo pr.or,ide tor parkir-rg deniands on site and rlirh r-rndr:rglor-nrci
rnd visually concealed palking.
[tern 6.1 t'ecogntzes the need to provrde serrioe and delivery i'acilities lbr existing and nerv
development.
E. Natural Hazards. We believe there are no nalural hazards that may affect development of this site.
F. Site and Bui-lding Design. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance with the Vail
Villaee Master Plan.
o Vail Plaza Hotel
96 1070.00
Zehren and Associates, lnc.
to/19/99
G. Pedestriat/Vehicular Circulation. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance with the
Vail Viilage Master Plan. Additionally, haffic studies indicate that vehicular circulation pattems are
considered safe and have relatively little impact on existing vehicular circdlation systems.
H. Functional and Aesthetic Landscaping. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance
with the Vail Village Master Plan. Additionaily, we believe we have substantially improved on the
amount and quality of publicly accessible plazas, greenspaces, and pedestrian circulation systems.
I. Phasing Plan. The development will be constructed in one phase with completion anticipated for late
fall of200l.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concems regarding the information presented.
Additionally, if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
-- _ -t| *-. ---r--'
'l'im Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
/' s lJ t-) tj \l1- !- | I l\. l- l-r
'\i'l I_r A:;5(J(:t,\tE5, ti.t .
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
PECiDRB Comments
George:
This is a written description responding to each of the issues raised by both the Design Review Board and
the Planning and Environmental Commission as outlined in you letter. dated 10/13199.
Vail Road Setback.
It is our intention that the proposed structures along Vail Road both be consistent with other structures
located along Vail Road and neets the "spirit" of the zoning requirements specifoing setbacks. The
existing sheetscape is one in which the majority of structures along Vail Road.maintain an €ast-west
orientation along their primary roof ridges with their street frontage at a maintaining a north-south
orientation creating a non-uniform setback along Vail Road. Additionally, the buildings step up in height
from south to north as they approach the Frontage Road. In the desigrr of the Vail Plaza Hotel we have
tried to maintain a similar orientation, setbacks, and height relationships along vail Road.
In order to maintain the "spirit" of the zoning we have attempted to maintain an average setbaqk of twenty
feet to the primary building walls at Vail Road exclusive of one story architectural projections. ln
exarnining our setbacks liom Vail Road, we have calculated the following:
fhe one-story portions of the stnrcture are non-habrtable, non-enclosed, architectural projections added tirr
visual interest and meant to enhance the pedestrian skeetscape. For this reason they were excluded liom
the average setback calculation. Chapter 13.58 addresses simrlar architectural projections that may extend
tnto the required setbacks.
The public benefit most specifically associated with this deviation ft'om the underlying zoning is an
enhanced pedestrian streetscape along Vail Road. Additionally, public receives an increased number of
sbofiterm overnight accommodation units associated with the redevelopment of this site.
,\hr i'lillr-ii,tl 'f i- \i.. i. I ii, , i;.1 iLtlL-)ll.r"i.r\i'ltlrl)(..ii',.\lir-l illt-i-Ii,rl.ll
o
Average Property
Line Setback
Average Curb Setback 'Total Leneth of Walls
One Story Frontage 9'-9"66'-6"
'I'hree Story Frontage t8'-9"32'-4"74'-0"
Four Story Fronta.ce 2l'-0"3l'-8"47'-6"
, \.,,eJ:age Setbercl< (3 & 4 stor;.,
areas only)
I 9' -ft"i 2'-{) "l2l -{r"
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0/19199
Building Height
Great care was given to ensure the resrdential units and commercial entries located within the Gateway
plaza receive direct sunlight. This rvas the primary concem at the time when the side setback was
tncreased the building height lowered from the previous proposal to the current proposal. Ihe lowest level
of residential units located on level three of the Gateway Plaza receive direct sunlight at 12:00 noon on
December 21, the day at which the sun is at the lowest point in the sky. The ground floor commercial
entries adjacent to Vail Road also receive direct sunlight from 12:00 noon on December 21 due to the fact
that the proposed structure steps down and to the east at Vail Road. Additionally, because the opening
between the existing Gateway Plaza and the proposed hotel face west, the amount of direct sunlight
increases on the Gateway Plaza as the sun sets in the day.
Any negative impacts due to the length of the proposed ridge would not substantially benefit the Gateway.
Breaks in the ridge would provide only a narrow slots of direct sunlight to pass to the Gateway that would
move across the fagade as the sun moves across the sky. These slots of light, intense differences between
light and dark areas would induce glare and may be an undesired effect on lower portions of the Gateway.
The perceived building height adjacent to the Gateway Plaza will be forty-five feet, the same uninterrupted
wall height as allowed by underlying zoning for flat roofed structures. This is due to the fact that the eave
is located at an elevation of 210' and the adjacent grade is located at an elevation of 165'. The distance
between the structures does not allow enough distance to perceive the proposed hotel ridge from any point
between the two structures at ground level. Additionally, projections from the primary building wall,
planters and lower floors step to break up the perceived mass of the wall.
Circulation
The hotel entrance at East Meadow Drive has been re-oriented to address some of the commissioner's
comments regarding the width and nah-Lre of the hotel entry. This area will continue to be studied for
additional resolutions to the issues raised.
The circulation path between the proposed hotel and Vail Viilage Inn Phase V has been redesrgned to
providc for an improved pedestrian experience.
The space between Vaii Village lnn Phase lll has been redesigned to create a linear "fingcr" park bet'uvcen
the struchres that rviil connect proposed pedeshian circulation systems located at the north and south
portions of the site.
The por.rl area adjacent to thc southem piaza has been redesignerl to incotporate a sedes of steppetl
retaining lvalls. pools and scatilc areas. i'Jo c()ntlnuolls l.alls over live feet in hcight e,.i.lst exccpt at tirc
extfellle llofthwest corner of the pool. Raiirngs have bcen redr-rced lo stone bollar-ds and urole transparent
steel railings and balustels to reduce the ap'parent height of r.valls. Pools cascade ti'om one level to another
providing "ivhite noise" that may alleviate any ooncems over noise. Sun/shade studies have been provided
to help alleviate any concerns over sunliglrt in the area.
The plaza south of Building B has been redesigned to increase the restaurant frontage, architecturally
identif, the entry area through both plaza configuration and building elevation, and identi$r clear
circulation paths.
Vail Plaza Horcl
961070.00
t' I
ZeruenandAsso.iil?#! t
Circulation (continued)
Every cffort will be made to encourage property ourneni within the district to upgrade their properties
especidly with rcgard to surface paving naterials.
Building Entsance
The porte-coclrere and hotel eaty on Vail Road has be€n rtconfigurcd to address the commissioner's
cornnrenb rcgFrdiug the pedestian expericnce and sens€ ofentsy to thp hotel. The siderryalk configrnation
at the north sidc ofthe site adjaceirt to the Gateway hss b€€n reviecd and incorporated into the desigr of
the entry arca.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions tr comnrcnts regarding the information presented
or any additional materials tbat 1ou mayneed in writing pur reporf
Sincerely,
Timl,ose
Proj€ct Managcr
Zehren and Associatcs" Inc.
3
'4i
?9,Eo.E
(Jow,
oo
rl')
Odr
;6
ON
>o
@.t--JoT'd::=
6
N
ru
o-
G
(!
c)
I.lJ
o.bo(!
YLL
-E
z
r;ii!
E/ t iir
=Eiliis ? iiE
>-E
E
d
q)
a
I
I
t
OolT8
€R
l}
>o
z2t2
tlJ ;-l!azirl
+Hfi;?l!
Nzi!
tot
=o
(J
@@
GN
_trL
(,.,\v
@
o-i==
T
6d
N6
Lr.-
6
N|
Hi5 .e
=16 ::sl {)_i iE
(!
N6
Iu
Er
=B:f
o
c,
IJJ
d
N(d
(n
-g=
=F'-
EE-
TPHg6-3E'
rn
o
rg
o
ll I E
,43
bo*F8
=m
{^v
|-
o
LlJ
UJ
Oo!
6dE$NiF'c:€
o->o
c)
J-.J
O
ll
6
OJ
tl!
v)
E
'{=
E
E
z
7 A E?e:<E;i; PiBi
=Eilrr\ t tli
N
lllFTtFIEE+ii ii g!sst!+++
t
5
tF
J!
+
+ + + ++****ftlE l! lE l! lEF F F FI"
I
I
tl
o
OorTS
o.{
E8
zzll
tll .i rl
s 3ld.= E:6i {:i
t\,1 : f :
6
=o.,=
UoIn
b0
.g
=€
'EP
O-r
d!-
G
NG
l--r.-
6
-
>oo-'
--
=v
v1
*Y
XEE3
l/),:
0J L/
-i-LLr
=HrY
(! r->(!o>._!.
-f
Ff)
z
it.atis1i ti
+
qi
F
I
ta
E
rs
(u
LUA
bmI
cCI*tr,H
=
€
f,\v
Oor
6dE$NFFru_-€
n->o
@
o
I
ru
iT
-'t
v)
OJ
Ill
c)
q)
IIJ
LIJ
1-
z
5;lii
.-* E l!'
5aili
r".r ? iii
N
9ff
'lr 1! '11
ttl
f
l!
r
I
3
t:
1!l!t
9f
Etlr-ft;
:l
I
e
q
Oar
E$
_9 <;o.{
_-€
to
L ZtZ
rlr;-Eg
,wald
=
Eti
NUE!
.t,
o
@@
€
b0g
=g
{^\v
@
o
I
ed
N
-ELL
6
c
?EU>(!o>.
-=
=\Jvt
tx
,r-r =rt,:
OJ \J
+:L$
il
+++d++.f,-I.llt**-+ EEEEEl! lr lr lJ 1 ']tr rf rrF
t t t tr
$$$$$
3:l'd
'11
r
+el
T
EY>(!o>
-?--f
Ft)
=vz
-cd 3a=T
| T :
{JE
@-'
r^\v
@.t-t
\J-x--
I
Oo\dT*tv k -NtR;iiUFr\, _- z
o-.to
rs
5;iii
M<IBI
=
!i3lNZili
J=-->.=-/snt-t!N/.
o
>t-
@
e'o
< -:-
2.)? U:i
€)-
€)Jr^v
@J_Jo
-L OdrrdE$
lNEX6.i(JIrv _- 6
Es8
:
e6
)
)(
_)
)
! r- ---
--"1
!
It-
l._.
L--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
i
I
I
I
-I
I
I
i
I
I_)
I
I! _=-| _-"-1-__
giii!
=Eili
..- a !rFNZEi;
:
:
:
I
I
:
U
I
I
I
:
q
:
.t
-:
1
r
It
I
I
I
L
+
I
t
t
- -'l
t
I
il
T
l>
LT
IEtJ
L,r'tat;L.
T
t
;
--l
rl
- -'l
-l
I;l
.J33lr l: llt ll ll lli I Il rlll I il illi li
:l:i rf,il il iililil:ilil:l:ll:li
3i 5t iil 3tit ril !t :t iilit:t 3lt i
,
J
,
!
i i + I ? i
El4l40i
i I q I ilf i
lt 1a; ;
Odr
GEENE!ru _.€
n_to
r;tii
e:Sldt
=
Eili
,'=, e EIEr\ i ttE
@#)
OT'
6
l--ltllltltft,
tE
t
lttii
J
I
Ali
i
I
_.
a*--=
- ---
Nll
uN3
?€):
q),HJ
f^,\v
(
,)
f'
I
I, r-
OorfdE$NFF16"-!
o-s6
@
OT
G
t
I
d
r:iii
(v a ld!
=EillN?Elt
w#
tloooqooo0ooo
o oQooqoooo
OOTOOOOOOO.r A .r l/^' ,,.\l.r ^ ^ ,'r\,, v \,, \-,,,.rt,\-,, v \_, \_,ooroo,ooooo
o o6oodooooooodooo6oootl
}, I KE4i rr "E
tl
! J ii a^\! i ils"z
IrI
r--r \ \
!,t_-..-t,r\trT;Tr:-'|inr \:
-i
; ./ f Vn:\-U .i- f:-,V |(ll'll)N |'t=-rn-p ii r" zf jie t-r!-!r ii ffiE .+
o
rl t
i6
6) .-
(uE
r..,\vk
.
{\\\\\)-
t,.,
)(
@
o
tl
Oo\cE$NFFirs__€
o_>o
=eg
=;lii8z i lit
=Eilix?ili
t
\
qF
-1
I
I
.-) cc Iavo () (] v oooc'oco
a\ /-.r .r;'-\ /-\ .-\,/v\,rs\,rvvooo600
6 C^O^O 6 o
o*o-o-
FI
F=drI-o Et=!;t-ffi
E_+
l,-H
L-
H=rfF1
h=H
n',8
ffi#
6#
o
l-Y b
@j
fl)3Ju)
(^\v
@
O
I
Oo'
6dE$NtR---l U hru .{
-=
ai
r'l
rg
5:iii
dSldr
=[iliru?ii!
Nll
€)g
q.- ix
6):
€, 'i;J
1^\v, \t(
@.t--J
OT
Oo\6E3Niic:€
o->o
6
z9E\t;;lli
4 ?l.Ez
=Eili
.: ^ lrF
N t IiE
Nll
t
€).t--)o
I
Ootd€8rv x -NiFiru -{
n EAt4
€
fr'^lli
,$ffilli
c==7--l\1
@
l_r_ +
€)1
a,i
(.,\V'\ ''ii
\'---it
@
O
OorcE$NFFirs -i
o==s6
6
n;lii
e=l1z
=Eifu
:
^ !rl
t*iZ iii
NIffa
1/r*
x
@?
eO-r
U;J,N
r^\Y
@
o
I
G
r;liig=IEI
=EilrileEl!
n
Oot
noE$
NFFicd:€
o-.>o
-LtIf{|
\ \t/ \t/
?'ry@'
,/]1/---) |\l-r
t---hL]
t-IL l-r
,/h\_--l I\J-i
-) --_-.,
:-----
N
6
e=J
o-Ag
M#
//..\v
@
o
t
Odr
rtsE$L-l 30r\,q Irs_-€
o->o
6
fi srii
'$trfili
--'i
.lAi\!>r(tl\J\\lkit-.-'Yti
r -,j '
'\. ,),
I
il
I'/
E;T-}itilI tl
OotfdE$NFF6:{
o->o
e
-EL
"s€)E
bo
=
@
1^v
a-t--J
O
Ie==
ru
I
I
t?
li
s i!;i
F{iie
r\,! i {!E
' ri ,,-\i,-.''I l.'l, ,'i i\,
$-, /; )-24
/Avt In_I-in;/ll
<"' 't il\F
-__t_l,l ,ftflJ
..r E
Nll
hJ I+Jt*E3Eoi
@ H=-T- 5i
bo Ei
l- -c c)
-g E-
Ans
(^. sv
Oor
6dE$
NFErg -. .fi
o-sd
5 SIiEe=lE.
=Hiliilall!
@
O
I
'6
i
't
:t
I
Ir
I
I
\
I
J
j
I
1
I
I
I
ti tri I
titq
i:l
U: I L-:
f'-l-t
/Vtr /r&t
'l u,
t)I
I
I
I
), I
lr-
t/
F
't..\S
!r2''.4r' j
(#
'z*
,ur/q
in,,q
r|,utl-ri-- tYCf -
s.E
=_q
a=
o@fg
tlt :-l- -r;
:-
:UrE=
='ia
€)U
oU
(^.v
aJ----t
O
I
Oo'dEENii6:{
A to
=rs
n;li:e=lq!
sEili
x?iii
N
ffff#$
!!t,qsftt!
tB.
LE JI,
ftrr\ffi
4
(:l :T-littfI tl
I
al
Ei
o
(\mav'n'w
@tmtil'/'
o)afm\t4"{
@\ teets+f'
1^#, f4'/
5.Rrf- l?"ltt'rtl VA-nAAHdE-
16oP.oo
Aareili As:.rrr
R@,nw3A8r f-'Zud"
ZgG'ee'lz-t'{' t'lr
,#E-12''11'$
,(5a\71'f
5hr'-E-n'Hr
fl ^# r+/
IElltr{
ZsPrc,'wh'w
:,rbrE l/-14'Fr
o
VAl|.r,aat tbrrr-
{6lop.oo
M+bffi-.tft1-.dffi_a,nq
€AE lu=b'o"
I. t$-irt --'F -Y
5 ^ $s.$< U 4LL.-
3s.#Wa53*Hf,
-=(' ^u{ v \,
--:>- \J
o
o
.3eE?=ca,,?5€cl 9FE? 1
;67
6t(|)x
u)=trr 53-lro).r'rtuc
-q)r{r)
Ootl+l a\ll o\
Cg of,Niclt5
-.4F{€Eod
=iliiiNI
oa)tr
?=e:
tr? t
.;aT
a==tr 53
=tc)AF\A
oo
r<o)
CJ
dc).F.
Hf{
ta
Na
FI
FI
-.-A
z9 7
rr !:.:*3 ;J iE,o': ; i i::.-x -:; :: !!;:i;?t
...9 :: Ei-;:! !:-xri i
.2eE
ct '-, Fr
=7 r
Jdd.'
.4xtr
=yc,=_- q)
Al\t^
oo
q)
<J
z!.iu"
uJ. ;; !;u :: ;:rfti i; ii:r;;;;ii
ur.;!i3
Ni?
-c)+l
tsi
NA
A,
f-(.-d
.29tr
e:<J
<;Fi
U)=F,trog
= t- \.,
o\
€\
co
0)
<J
z,: ;.
: ": :u
; i; a:.
oa.r ; ; ;;;
:tri Ji i; i6 i r ;iuJ. i E :"i
N?:
-()*)
f*l
d
Nd
Ft,
-.Il
d
illl
.?9F
"==a4-
-.Hl\JG()tr?<tsFota't
a-
-l
F IZ)lra=.
-etrog.;&d
C1
o\
lrc)
q,)
=i.'' iiii.o: !! ;:;
-L,i .i i i9 !
'; i!;ir-ti i
-F)
H)li
d
Nrl
-AF{
-.-
,t
.2Ptr
sle,,.'tr-<.!F
4) v) L
el ()-Q
ax?,tro?.AE;
€\o\o\
Lq)
c.)
ul i; 1id 1:;3rtf; " i li;
" !t !:ir3 !i;li6;:6eru: :; :a
Ni;
-lq)
-aJ
Hf+l
Ft
Nrt
/,\,
.=
d
.99tr
8E 5cic();eFf#I
'lO 'E d)
.E fr€-'aq)
;EA
:i;iil
€).ar)
.\q o\Ft €\tl s\
Cq odNiGl 6
-.QAOr-l E;o
.cg
.99tr
ts i
XEi
E fr€(/lzi.',
;gA
o\e\o\
€
!(u
CJ
Flq)
.+.|a
A
hairr
cq
N
cqE
F.{
-.x;l
zvir; !: i:
:;siiii,: si!l
Vail Plaza Hotel
96t 070.00
One Story Areas
One Storv Areas
Road Prop. Line PL+ Road Leneth
North Setback 10.15 15.44 25.59
South Setback I L3I 12.07 23.38
Total Sctback 2l.46 27 .51 48.97
AverageSetabck 10.73 13.76 24.49 18.50
Length*Average 198.51 254.47 452.97
North Setback 12.00 11.06 23.06
South Setback 13.54 5.68 19.22
Total Setback 25.54 16.74 42.28
fl
Zehren and Assocratcs. Inc.
t0/19t99
Average Setabck
Length*Average
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setabck
LengthtAverage
l2.n 837 2t.t4 29.50
376.72 246.92 623.63
13.7E 9.67 23.45
14.18 6.29 20.47
27.96 15.96 43.92
13.98 7.98 2t.96 r8.s0
258.63 147.63 406.26
Total Length*Average 833.85 649.01 1482.E6 66.50
Average Setback 12.54 9.76 22.30
o
PaBe I
Three Story -A reas
North setback Y.on @rro t'fo.,, I ensth
South Sethack 13..51 23.45 3d.q6
Total Setback 25.60 51.73 77.33
Average Setaback 12.80 ZS.B7 38,67 26.50Length*Average 339.20 685.42 t024.62
North Setback 13.51 20.39 33.90
South Setback 13.54 . 15.73 29.32
Total Setback 2'1.10 36.12 63.22
Average Setaback 13,55 18.06 31.61 3.94Length*Average 53.39 71.16 L24.54
North Setback 13.59 15.73 29.32
South Setback 14.36 9.23 23.59
Total Setback 27.95 24.96 52.91AverageSetaback 13.9E lZ.4S 26.46 35.63Length*Average 497.93 444.66 942.59
North Setback 14.36 9.23 23.59
South ,Setback t4.43 12.45 26.88
Total Setback 28.79 2t.68 50.47
Average Setabck 14.40 10.84 25.24 3.94Length*Average 56.72 421 | 99.43
North Setback
South Setback
Total Setback
Average Setabck
Length*Average
14.43 36.51 50.94t4.49 35.78 50.27
28.92 72.29 l0l.2l
t4.46 36.1s 50.61 4.00
57.84 144.58 202.42
Total Length*Average 1005.07 t3Bg.S3 2393.60 74.01
Average Setback 13.58 18-76 32,34
Page 2
l' ,l
Four Storv Areas
Road Prop. Line PL + Road Lcngth
NorthSetback 9.04 51.09 60.13
. SouthSctback g3t 50.22 59.57TotalSetback 1E.39 l0t.3t 119.70Avcntcsetrbrck 920 50.66 59-t5 4.00LcngthrAverage 36.7t 202.62 219.q
North Selbact
South Sctback
Total Setback
Average Setaback
Length*Average
North Setback
Soutt Setback
Total Setback
Averege Setebeck
LengthfAverage
North Sctbsck
SouthSctback '
Total Sclback
AvcngcSetebck
lrngthtAvcrage
9.35 26.tE 35.53. 95r 21.s1 3r.r218.96 47.69 66.659.48 23A5 3333 3.9537.4s 94.t9 . 131.63
9.61 21.51 31.t2
r l.Es 15.00 26.8s2t.46 36.5t s7.n10.73 1EJ6 28.99 35.63
3E231 650.43 1032.74
11.85 ts.00 26.8512.00 11.06 23.0623.E5 26.06 49.91il.93 13.03 24.% 3.9446.98 s1.34 98.32
Total LengthrAverage 511352 99857 1502.119 47,52
Averege Setback 10.60 21.01 31.61
t!
Three Storv Areas
Road Proo. Line PL + Road Lenetli
Total Length*Average 1005.07 1388.53 2393.60 74.01
Average Setback 13.5E 18.76 32.34
Four Story Arers
Total Length*Average 503.52 998.57 1502.09 47.52
Average Setback 10.60 Zl.01 3 I .61
Total Averaee Sgtback
Total I ngrhtAvcrage 1508.59 2397.ro 3895.70 lzr.53
Average Setback 12.41 19.64 32.06
l!
' Vail Plslir Hotel
961070.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
1Oil9t99
Gross Squore Footege 7,791.00
Dwellins Unit 4I9f Deck Arca Kevs BedroomE Lvnq Rm pillows
Dwelling Unit (uppcr level) 2,O02.W 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club ijnits
Unit Nurrbcr Arcr Deck Arer Kws Bcdrooms . LrlKit pillows
Club Unit39 (Uppct tcvcl) 814.00 101.00 l.0O 1.00 l.0O 4.00
Oub Unit 40 (Upp€r l-evcl) 814.00 tot.oo 1.00 l.0O 1.00 4.00
Club ljnit4l (Upper lrvcl) 860.00 101.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit42 (Jppcr Level) 715.00 tOl.OO. l.0O t.0O l.O0 4.00
Club Unit43 (Upper l-evel) 814.00 10t.00 t.00 l.OO 1.00 4.00
Club LJnit /|4 ftlpp€r t vcl) 814.00 10t.00 1.00 l.0O LlB 4.00
suLTorrl clrb 4f31.00 606.00 6.m 6.00 6.00 24.00
Conidor(public) 0.0O.
Corc (clevator) tio.oo
Level 6
CoI€ (stair) 0.00
Mechanical (roollord 22?.OO
Sub'Totel Arcr
flualling Llnit Net 2,002.00
Club Unit Net 4.831.00
Othsr Nct 372.00
TotdNct 7,205.00
NcUGrors Difierence 5t6,00 92Vo
FILE COPY
Level 6
i
Page i
Vail Plaza Hotel
,96 t070.00
Level 5
Grols Squrre Footrge
Dwellirs UEit
Durclling Unit (owcr lwel)
Club Unitc
Ulit Ntrpbcr
Club Unit 32 (Jppcr lrvcl)
Club Unit 33 (Uppc Levcl)
Club Unit 34 (Upp€r LcvcD
Club Llnit 35 (Upper kvcl)
Club Unit 36 (Uppcr lrvcl)
Club tlnit 39 (Iauar Levcl)
Club Unir 40 @ower kvcl)
Club Lrnit 4l (Iawcr l-evcl)
CIub unit 42 (I-owcr l-evcl)
Club Unit 43 (-oum Level)
Club Unit l|4 flrwcr kvell
SrbTotd c|rb
Other Arces
Conidor (public)
Co'r (cl€vator, nEch. shafr)
Maid
Cott ($trir)
Sub'Totel (Xhcr Arces
Dwelling lJnit Net
Club ljnit Nct
Othcr Net
Totrl Net
Nct/Gross Dillerence
Levcl 5 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/19D9
t5it9E.00
Artr
3,033,00
Arca
814.@
t 14.00
Et4.(X)
814.00
8 | 4.00
913.00
979.00
486.00
r,369.00
992.00
992.00
91t0r.00
Artr
|,616.00
t5l.m
0.00
t 28.00
rt95.00
3,033.00
9,801.00
t.E95.00
14,729.0O
I,t69.|xl
Deck Aree
450.00
DeckAne
154.00
154.m
t 54.00
l54.00
154.00
0.00
0.00
o.00
0.00
o.(rc
0.00
770.fit
Kcys
4.00
Kcf,s
t.00
L00
r.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
zJA
t7.|n
Pillows
E.00
Bcdroors Studio
3.00 1.00
Bcdroons
1.00
t.00
1.00
1.00
L00
2.W
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.N
2.N
16.00
4.00
44.O0
LR/Kit Pillows
t.00 4.00
l.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
|.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
0.00 4.00
0.00 4.00
0.00 2.00
1.00 6.00
0.00 4.00
0.00
6.00
93'/o
o
i
I
Page 2
)
Vail Plaza Hotcl
.961070.00
Lqel4
Grosr Squrrc Footrgc
Club Units
Unit Number
Club Unit | 9 (Upper Levcl)
Club thit 20 (Upper lrvel)
Club unit 2l (Uppc|' Irvel)
Club Unit_23 (Flao
Club Unit 25 (Upper l-evel)
Club Unit 26 (tjppcr L€vel)
Club Unit 27 (Upper Lcvel)
Club Unit 3l (Flat)
Club Unit 32 (Iawcr Level)
Club Llnit 33 (.ower L,evel)
Club Unil 34(I-orver Inrcl)
Club Unit 35 (I-owcr I-cvel)
Club Unit 36 (Iowr l-crcl)
Club Unit 37 (FlaQ
Club Unit 38 (Fla0
sub-Totil crhb
Accomodrtion Utrits
Unit TlpeA
Other Arrrs
Conidor (pubtic)
Core (elcvstor)
Maid
Cor€ (stair)
Sub-Totd Oth€r Arerj
Club ljnit Net
Accomrnodation Nct
Otber Net
Totrl Net
Nevcross Dilference
Level 4 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0^9199
26,28E.00
Aree
790.00
790.00
790.00
983.00
790.00
?90.@
r:16.00
t,095.00
513.00
I,034-00
I,034.00
t,034.00
979.N
1,234.@
t234.00
r4J06.00
Ave. Arer
371.58
Area
2,915.00
150.00
209.00
379.00
3,653.00
r4306.00
6,3t6.79
3.653.00
24,275.79
2,O12.21
Deck Area
10t.00
101.00
101.00
250.00
l0 t.00
101.00
101.00
101.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10t.00
101.00
r,159.00
Bedrooms
t.00
l 00
t.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
t.00
1.00
2.00
2.W
2.00
2.W
2.00
2.00
21.00
Pillows
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
62.O0
Keys
1.00
1.00
t.00
2.@
l.00
r.00
l.00
2.W
1.00
2.O0
2.W
2.00
2.@
2.N
2.00
23.00
Studio
1.00
1.00
r.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
r.00
0.00
0.(X)
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
10.00
Kevs Totrl Aree
t7.00 6,316.79
Page 3
Vail Plaza Hotel
96 t 070.00
_ Level 3
Gross Squrre Footrgc
Club UniG
Unlt TvDc
Club unit 45 (Flag
Club Unit 46 @ag
Club Unit 17 (Fbq
Club Unit 18 @ag
' Club lJnit l9 (I-owcr Lcvcl)
Club Unit 20 (Ircrcr Lcvcl)
Club Unit 2 I (I-owcr l-cvel)
Club Unil 22 (Flat)
Club LJnit 47 (Flat)
Club Unit 24 (Flat)
Club Unit 25 (lrwer Irvel)
Club LJnit 26 (Lower Lcvcl)
Club Unit 27 (Lowrr lrvcl)
Club Unit 28 (Flat)
Club LJnit 29 (FIat)
Club Unit 30 (Flar)
Sub.Totd Club Urits
Accopodrdon Units
Unit Type A
Other Arers
Maid
Conidor @ublic)
Corr (clcvator)
Corc (stair)
SubTotrl Other Arces
Totals
Club Net
Acco[unodation Net
Othet Net
Totrl Nct
NcVGross Difference
Level 3 Zehren and Associates. Inc.
r0n9t99
317s9.Ut
Area
1,r60.00
1,164.00
764-W
| 2r4-0o
593.00
1,088.00
I,060.00
t,t29.00
975.00
978.00
97E.00
978.00
978.00
951.00
r275.0O
tr34.00
l65l9.oo
Ava Aree
368.62
278.00
4,632.W
150.00
444.@
5504.00
l6Jt 9.oo
9,584.00
5.504.00
3t,607.00
I,152.00
Iteck Arce
101.00
l01.00
Et.00
81.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
t42.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.m
t t.00
8 t.00
66t.00
Bedrooms
t.00
1.00
2.00
t.00
1.00
2-OO
2.@
t.00
1.00
t.00
2.W
2.OO
2.00
t.00
2.N
2.@
2400
Plllows
4.00
4.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
6-00
6.00
66.00
Kcys
1.00'
t.00
2.(n
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
t.00
2.00
2.ffi
2.W
2.00
2.00
Studlo
1.fl)
L00
t.00
r.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
t.00
l.a0
9.00
2.N
2.W
2n0
n.00
Kcvs Totrl Arer
26.N 9,584.00
960/0
Page 4
1
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Level2
Gross Squerc Footege
Club Units
Unlt Tvpc
Club Unit 4 (Rat)
Club Unit 5 (Flat)
club unir 6 (Fhr)
Clubtnit7(Rat)
Club Unit 8 (Flat)
Club Unit 9 (Flat)
Club Unit l0 @aQ
Club Unit ll (Flat)
Club unit 12 (Flat)
Club Unit 13 (Flat)
Club Unit l4 (Flat)
Club Llnit 15 @at)
Club unit l6 fflat)
Sub-Tot l Club Units
Accomodation Units
UnitTpeA
Other Arees
M.id
Corridor (public)
Corc (elevator)
Core (stair)
Sub.Totel Othcr Arc|3
Totrls
Club N*
Accommodation Net
Other Net
Totd Net
Ncl/Gross Dillerence
33,947.00
Aree
1,192.00
982.00
I,193.00
ry'85.00
1,042.00
%5.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
95r.00
r275.N
t22l.N
14182.00
Avc. Aree
362.85
300.m
4,328.00
150.00
491.00
5,259.00
t4,182.00
12,336.80
5r69.00
31,787.60
1rs9.20
Dcck Area
81.00
0.00
8 t.00
142.00
0.00
200.00
0.00
8r.00
8 t.00
E 1.00
81.00
81.00
8l.00
990.00
Level 2
Kevs
2.W
L00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.W
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.N
24.00
Bedrooms
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.O0
2.00
t.00
1.00
r.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.N
2,N
20.00
Strdio
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
t.00
|.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
I1.00
Pillows
6.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
4.00
4.(n
4.fl)
4.00
4.O0
4.00
4.00
6.00
6.00
62.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0/L9t99
Kws Totel Arer
34.00 t2,336.80
Page 5
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Level I
Gross Square Footrge
Club Units
Unit TYDG
Club Unit I @at)
Club Unit 2 (Flat)
Club Unit 3 Glar)
SuFTotrl Club Urltr
Accomodation Units
Unit Typc A
Rctdl
Rctail Thce
Rchil Four
Ssb-Told Rct ll
R€strurrnt
Main Restaurant (Bufret)
Sp€cialtv Rcstaurant
Snb-Totd Rcr*eurrnt
Lourqc
tanmgc
Other Arees
Conidor (public)
Kitchedscnric€
Truck Dock/Auto Circ.
Rcsroons
Maid
Core (elcvrtor)
Core (stair)
Sub..Totrl Othcr Arcrs
Totals
Club Net
Accornmodation N€l
Rctail Net
Restaurant Net
l,ounge Net
Other Net
Totrl Nct Ar€r
NcUGross DilTerence
Level I Zehren and Associat€s, Inc.
t0/t9t99
44028.00
Arrr
|,297.00
l,251.00
1542.00
1,090.00
Ave. Arcr
353.76
Arca
875.00
0.00
t75.00
Arcr
t22t.o0
5,144.00
E,r32.00
6263.W
589.00
293.OO
275.00
546.00
2t,242-00
4,090.00
7,429.00
875.00
3,803.00
I,228.00
2t.242.OO
38,667.00
3J6r.00
Deck Arcr
E 1.00
81.00
142.00
30{.00
Bedrooms
2.00
2.N
2.W
6.00
Studlo Pillows
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.m
3,00 18.00
Kcvs
2.00
2.00
2.N
6.00
!@ Occ. Frctor Occuprtr|!
2,155.00 18.00 119.72
r.648.00 2s.00 55,923.t03.011. 1t5.6/t
Kevs Totrl Ar€r
2 r .00 7 ,429 .OO
Occ. Frctor ('ccuputr
t 8.00 68.22
Page 6
Vail Pl"'- Hotel
961070.00
Level 0
Gros! Sqlrr. Footrge
Retil
Rctail One
Reizil Two
SutsToal R€hil
Lobbv Bar
Lobby Bar
Lobbv
l-obby
Adn nlstredon
FurtD6k
Accountine
Totd AdminirFrtlotr
Spa - Mcn'Vworl(out
Men's lrclcn8acilities
Treatmcnt
Deck
Exerrcisey'Wokout
Sub-Totd Spe
Confcrcnce
Main Ballroorn
Pr€-cdlvcnc
Sub-'Totd Corfer€nc€
Senice Anees
Exterior Clrculation
Covered Ramp (North)
Covered Auto Entry (West)
Covered Pedestrian (East)
Total
Other Areas
ResEooms
Core (elcvalor)
Core (Stair)
CorridorPublic)
Tot l Other Areas
Perkine Provided
Val€t Spaces
Level 0 Zehren and Associates. Inc.
t0/19/99
4E,675.qt
1,615.00
1.330.00
2943.OO
Arer
&7.M
Arer
\426.N
2,t92.W
1.3it0.00
3532.00
3,150.00
2,U7.W
rJ92.00
1.686.00
&675.00
Arer
7,004.00
2.485.00
9189.00
6Jt t.oo
I,00E.00
5:64.0O
1.168.00
7,640.00
589.00
275.00
568.00
3.740.00
5,172.00
12.00
Occ, Fact.
20.00
Occ. Fact.
30.00
OccuD.
32.35
Occul.
&t.t7
Occ, Factor Occuprnti
15.00 466.93
7.00 355.00
Page 7
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Totals
Retail Net
Bar Net
I-bby Net
Administration Net
Spa Net
Confer€nce Net
Servic€ Nct
Exlerior Circulation Net
Othcl Nct
Totrl Net
NeUGross Dillerclcc
2,945.N
647.00
2,426.00
3,532.00
8,675.00
9,489.00
6,318.00
7,640.00
5.172.00
16,U4.00
t,t3t.rx,
Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/19t99
960/"
o
Page 8
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Level Minus Onc
Gross Squsre Fooirge
Spe
Womenl l,ockers/Facilities
Treafilent
Deck Arca
Excrgiscy'Workout
Pool fu€a
SutsTotal Spr
Conferencc
Brcakout
Prc-convcne
Sub.Totrl Conf€rcDcc
Servlce
Othcr Arees
Mechanical
Corrido(Public)
Cor€ (elevato4
Corc (stair)
Public Restrooms
Sub"'Tot!l
Perkins Provided
Valet Spaccs
Parking Spaces (Full Size)
Parking Snaccs (Compact)
Sub-Totrl PrrHng
Totals
Other Areas N€t
Spa Net
Conf€r€ncc N€t
Serrdce Net
Parking and Ramp Nct
Totrl Nct
Net/Gross Difference
Level -l
Occ, Frctor Occuornts
15.00 224.27
7.00 355.00
Arcr Arer,/Sprcc
21,289.N
97%
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
loll9/99
s5J9r.00
Arca
3,150.00
2,090.00
s,7l1.00
7E6.00
2.a72.W
14,609.00
Area
3J64.0O
2.485.00
5,849.0O
7,971-OD
I17.00
2,289.00
27s.00
568.00
589.00
3"838.00
Sneccs
2.OO
49.00
7.OO
5&00
Area
3,838.00
14,609.00
5,849.00
7,97t.OO
21.289.Q9
53"556.00
r,$5.00
367
Page 9
I*vel -2
(l
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
ton9fixt
Vail Plaza Hotcl
96r070.00
LcvdMbmTryo
Gror Squerc Footrgc 33,271.N
Grtlcr Arts
Mcchrnicel 0.00
Cddrlr(Fblic) XE.X)
Colt (clcvrffi) 150.00
Cq! (rtrh) 2&t.m
Srb-TotrlOltcrArx a6ll.l0
Ag
ValctSpoc€s 104.00
Puting Spaccr (Fhlt Siz) 85.00
Pr*ine Soaccs (Comlctl 0-00
SrbTotel Prrlirg ft,IO 5r'205.0tt 270.925Y259
OtlcrNet 660.00
Pr*inq rd Rrtrp Na 5lr05.m
TorrlNcr 51165.00
Nst/Grog Dlficrcrcc f10600 nU.
Pagc l0
I
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Dwellinp Uuits
Dwelling Unit I
Club Unitr
Club Unit I (Flat)
Club Unit 2 (Flat)
Club Unit 3 (Flat)
Club Unil4 (Rat)
Club Unit 5 (Flat)
Club Unit 6 @at)
Club Unit 7 (Flat)
Club Unit 8 (Flat)
Club Unit 9 (Flat)
Club Unit l0 (Flat)
ClubUnitll(Rat)
Club Unit 12 (Flat)
Club Unit 13 (nd)
Club Unit 14 (Flat)
Club Unit 15 (Fl8t)
Club Unit l6 (Flat)
Club Unit 17 (trat)
Club Unit l8 (Flat)
Club Unit 19 (Two l-evcl)
Club LJnit 20 (t|o I-evel)
Club Unit 2l (Two Level)
Club Unit 22 (Flat)
Club Unit 23 (Flat)
Club tjnit 24 (Flat)
Club unit 25 (two bvel)
Club Unit 26 (Ino t evcl)
Club unit 27 (rwo LrvcD
Club Unit 28 (Flal)
Club Unit 29 (Rat)
Club Unit 30 (Flat)
Club Unit 3l (Flat)
Club Unit 32 (Two Level)
CIub Unit 33 (Two kvcl)
Club Unit 34 (Two kvcl)
Club Unit 35 (Two l-evcl)
Club Unit 36 (Tlvo l,eyel)
Club Unit 37 (Flat)
Club Unit 38 (flat)
Club Unit 39 (T\yo Lcvcl)
Club Unit 40 (]-v/o l4vel)
Club Unil 4l (1'wo Levcl)
Club Unit 42 CIwo t-evel)
CIub Unit 43 (Two level)
Club Unit 44 (Two l-evel)
club unir 45 (Flat)
Club Unit 46 (Flat)
Club Unit 47 (Flatl
Total Club Prrkitrg
Parking Summary
Totel Area Park. Factor Park. Req'd
5,035.00 >2000 2.50
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0/19t99
Totrl Arer
t297.00
1251.00
1,542.00
I,192.00
982.00
I,193.00
1,485.00
I,042.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
951.00
t275.00
r22r.00
764.00
r:14.00
1,383.00
r,878.00
1,850.00
1,t29,00
983.00
978.00
1,768.00
1,768.00
2,194.00
951.00
1275.O0
1,234.00
t,095.00
1,327.00
1,84E.00
t,848.00
1,848.00
I,793.00
|,234.O0
r,234.00
1,727.00
I,793.00
1,346.00
2p84.00
l,806.00
1,806.00
I,160.00
1,t64.00
975.00
63,729.00
Frctor Snecc!
500<2000 2.w
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.w
50F2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
5004000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.w
50{K20fi) 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500{000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500€000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.o0
>2000 2.50
500<2000 2.N
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.o0
500<2000 2.M
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.oo
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.o0
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
>2000 2.50
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
500<2000 2.00
50G2000 2.w
95.00
Page I I
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Accommodatlon Units
Total Acc. IJnits
Rastlurent
Toirl Rcstauranl
Lornqc
Totrl lrungc
Retril
Total Rctail
Conferencc
Main Ballroom
Brrakotft
Totrl Rcodrcd Sprc€J
Toul Dq/rlling Unit
Toral Club
Tolal Accomodatiql
Total Restaurant
Tobl lrungc
Total Retail
Confcrcncc
Add'l SDD Parting Requircd.
Prrtins Deficit (Prsv. SDD)
Sub-Totrl Prrkirg
Mixed Usc Reduction (l(P/")
Totrl Perking Required
Tolrl Prrbng Provldcd
Parking DilIcrercc
Parkins Provided
Previous SDD|
IJvel Zero Parking
kvel Minus One Parking
I-pvel Minus Two Parkine
Total Parking Provided
Percentage
Parking Sunrnary
Soaces
74.E7
SertJ
1E5.64
Sc!
65.92
ScNtt
466.93
224.27
Valet
0
t2
t04
u8
326/o
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
t0/r9t99
ATCT
35566-s9
ArGI
3,803.00
Arcr
1,875.00
&
3,E20.00
Arce
7,004.00
3J64.00
2.50
95.00
74.t7
23.2r
8.24
12.73
43.20
70.00
75.00
104,.75
4.47
w
371
1
Full Sizc
tt2
0
49
85
246
66Vo
KeYs
9E.00
Sert f,'rct,
20.49
Sert Frct-
2s.00
f,'rctbr
l:3fi) sq. ft.
Scrt Frct
15.00
15.(rc
Corllpact
0
0
7
a
7
2"/o
Frctor
l:8 s€aa
Frctor
l:t scars
Sorces
23.2r
Solccr
8.24
Sorccr
tL73)
Frtior Sorces
l:16 scats.r 29.18
l;l6scats:r l4.Oz
Tolal
|2
t2
{!
189
371
t00%
*'l 12 tolal spaces exist (42 owned by phase IV)
riassume 5070 intemaypublic txansportatior/p€destsian traffc
P^Ee 12
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Dwellius Units
Dwelling Unit I
Club Units
Club Unil I (Rat)
Club Unit 2 (RaD
Club Unit 3 (Flst)
Club Unit 4 (Flat)
CIub Unit 5 (Flat)
Club Unit 6 (Flat)
Club Unit 7 (Flat)
Club Unit 8 (Flal)
Club Unit 9 (Flat)
Club t nit l0 (Flat)
ClubUnitll (Flat)
Club Unit 12 (Flat)
Club Unit l3 (naO
Club Unit l4 (Flat)
Club Unit l5 (Rat)
Club Unit l6 (Flat)
Club Unit l7 (Flat)
Club Unit l8 (Flat)
Club t.hit l9 (Two Level)
Club Unit 20 (Two Lcyel)
Club Unit 2l (Two kve l)
Club Unit 22 (Flat)
Club Unit 23 (Flat)
Club Unit 24 (Flat)
Club Unit 25 (Two kvel)
CIub l.lnit 26 (Two kvel)
club Unit 27 (Two l-evel)
Club Unit 28 (Flat)
Club Unit 29 (Flat)
Club Unit 30 (Flat)
Club Unit 3t (nat)
Club Unit 32 (Two Level)
Club Unit 33 (Two l,evel)
Club Unit 34 (1wo kvel)
Club Unit 35 (Two Level)
Club Unit 36 (Two kvel)
Club Unir 37 (Flat)
Club Unit 38 (Flat)
Club Unit 39 (Two l-cvcl)
Club Unit 40 (Two Lcvel)
Club Unit 4l (Two Level)
Club Unit 42 (Trvo L-evel)
Club Unit 43 (Two Level)
Club Unit 44 (Two l,evel)
Club Uni145 (Flat)
Club Unit 46 (Rat)
Club tJnit 47 (Flat)
Total Club Units
Program Summary
UoperArea LowerArea Total Area
2,002.00 3,033.00 5,035.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
l0/19199
LR/Kit Pillows
r0.00
LR/Kit Pillows
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
0.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
r.00 6.00
0.00 4.00
I .00 4.00
1.00 4.00
l.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
r.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6-00
r.00 6.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 4_00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.o0
1.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 E.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
t.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 6.00
l_00 6.00
1.00 6.00
1.00 8.00
1.00 8.00
I.00 6.00
2.OO 10.00
r.o0 8.00
LOO 8.00
1.00 4.00
1.00 4.00
0.00 4.00
45.00 266.00
Upoer Area
l297.N
I,251.00
|,542.00
I,r92.00
982.00
I,193.00
1,485.00
|,042.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
951.00
r2't5.N
122t.00
764.00
12t4.00
790.00
790.00
790.00
r,129.00
983.00
978.00
7m.00
790.00
| 316.00
951.00
r,275.00
1,234.00
1,095.00
814.00
814.00
814.00
814.00
814.00
|,234.OO
1234.00
814.00
814.00
860.00
715.00
814.00
814.00
I,160_00
I,164.00
975.00
47,729.00
Lower Area
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.o0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
593.00
1,088.00
I,060.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
978.00
9'.18.00
978.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
s13.00
|,034.00
1,034.00
l,034.00
979.00
0.00
0.00
913.00
919.OO
486.00
I,369.00
992.00
992.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
t6,000.00
Total Area
1297.0O
1251.00
t,542.00
I,192.00
982.00
I,193.00
1,485.00
1,042.00
965.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
969.00
95t.00
| 275.00
r22l.0o
764.00
I,214.00
1,383.00
1,878.00
1,850.00
t,129.00
983.00
978.00
1,768.00
1,768.00
2,194.00
951.00
t,275.00
|,234_00
1,095.00
|,327 .00
1,848.00
r,848.00
1,848.00
1,793.00
I,214.00
I,234.00
|,'72't .00
| ,793,00
1,346.00
2Jt84.O0
l,806.00
I,806.00
1,160.00
1,164.00
975.O0
63,729.N
Page 13
Deck Area
450.00
Deck Area
81.00
81.00
142.00
8 t.00
0.00
81.00
142.00
0.00
200.00
0.00
8l.00
81.00
81.00
E1.00
8r.00
81.00
8l .00
81.00
101.00
l0t .00
'101.00
t42.00
250.00
0.00
t0t.00
101.00
101.00
0.00
81.00
81.00
r0|.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
101.00
r01.00
l0l.00
101.00
l0 r .00
101.00
101.00
101.00
l0l.00
101.00
0,00
3,727.00
Keys Bedrooms
4.00 4.00
Kevs Bedrooms
2.O0 7.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 2.0Q
2.00 2.00
2-00 2.00
1.00 2.00
2.00 1.00
2.00 1.00
2.00 l.o0
2.N 1.00
2,00 1.00
2.O0 1.00
2.M 2.00
2.N 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 t.00
2.00 . 1.00
2.00 t.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
2.00 t.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.oo
2.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2_00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.oo
2.00 2.oo
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.O0
3.00 3,00
3.00 3_00
2.00 2.00
4.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 r.00
2.00 1.00
98.00 88.00
Vail Plara Hotcl
961070.00
nttl|l
- Rctail One t6t j
RctailTwo 1330
ReiailThree. 875.00
Retail For.n 900
Toad Rctril 1t2&0a
AdnlmFetion 3S3Lf
Progrun Sunrnary
lt.
Zchrcn md Associalcs, Inc.
tur9t99
oAccumodrtion Udtr f,mu Arcr Rmr Tord Arct lt.ctArc. XlE Bcdrmu IU&E
T.bl AGc. Urlt f3.t t 9&|(l 35,66a$ 0.0t tt 00 t0.00 196.00
rrl&rllrl Trtrl roaJato5t 0.[ z',tn ttotoo
f,rrtrmrt lr.rdf,AE o.G.h.'br s*
Ittrin R.lourlrt 2,155.00 18.00 ltg.tz
SDcsidtv Rca,t]mt 1.6tt,00 25.00 e!,gA
Trtrl Rshrnrt .lrc.m n.0 I'sL
Lounsc
kbby Br I f48.00 25.00 65.92
Confcrence Frcllltcr Scedn Arce occ. Frctor S.rgMrhBrllmom ?Jtra 15 $7
Brc.b||t 3&1 15 XU
Plc€mrcnc 1gn L 2:E
Trtrl Corvcll.r fsr:titr
Spr
I,evel7fro E,675.0O
IrvelMinl|sonc r4-6tlo.m
?3''','|
Page 14
Vail PI'za Horel
961070.00
Level 3 Lcvel4
32,?59.00 26,288.00
Area Summary
Level 6 Totel
7,79t.00 316,048.00
D\'{cllin8 Unit
Club Unit
Accommodation Unit
Rrtril
L,obby
Rest&urant
Lounge/Ber
Confcreircc
Prc€onvictre
Kitchcn
Food ard Bcveragc
F ont office
Sal€s/Cater. (rrulti.use)
AccourtinS
Exccttive Oflicc
Rccciving/Stcagc
Posonncl (office)
Servics Arcas
I:un&y
Housekecping
Engineering
Mechanical @lant)
Q*"" c*'"*ol
Spa CfrEatrn€nt)
Pool Dcck
Pool ArGa
Eracisc Rooms
Corridor (public)
Corrirtor (service)
Core (eler|ator)
CorG (stair)
Parkmg (spaces, rarnp)
Club Unit Storagc Area
R6troorns/CoatvEtc_
[-oading Dock
Seruice Storage
Maid (Sarelli!q)
Sub-Total Net Areas
Lcvel -2 Level -l
53 27t.oo 55,39t.0o
225.OO
150.00
285.00
51,205.00
o.oo
5r,865.00
Level 0
4E,675.00
1J64.00
2,4E5.00
2,945.00
2,426.00
647.W
7,004.00
2,4E5.00
7,t92.00
l J40.00
I 17.00
3,150.00
2,090.00
5,7 t 1.00
2,872.W
786.00
2289.00
3,r 50.00
2,441-W
1,392.00
r,686.00
3,740.00
275.OO 275.OO
568.00 568.00
21289_00 7 54O.0O
589.00 589.00
0.0o 9___AQ
53,556.00 46,844-00
Level I Level 2
42,028.00 33,947.00
4,090.00
7,429.00
875.00
3,803.00
t,z28.w
t4,182.00 16,519.00
r2J36.r0 9J84.00
4,328.00
r50.00
491 .00
t4,306.00
6,3t6.79
4,632.OO 2,9t5.00 1,616.00
Lev€l 5
15,89E.00
3,031.00 2,002.oo
9,801.@ 4,831.00
222.OO
7,97 t.00 6,3 I E.00 8,r 32.00
5,144.00
275.OO
546.00
589.00
6,263.OO
.l,l6l .00
92%
l5l.o0
12E.00
0.00
150.00
0.oo
5,035.00
63,729.00
3s,fi6l,9
3,E20.00
2,426.00
3,flt3.00
r,E75.00
r0,3dt.00
4,970.00
0.00
0.00
1r9L00
0.00
rJ40.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22,421.0O
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
339.00
6JrXr.o0
4,537.00
7,t03.00
1E7L00
\472.00
u,&i,gro
0.00
t,726.00
3,409.00
t0rt34.oo
0,00
t,767.00
6,263.00
0.00
1.0t0.00
300,536.59
15.51l..tI
t50/d
150.00 150.00
,144.00 379.00
i,s35.00
91%
I,331.00
96Vo
] lSAtn
94%
r,1i2.00
,bo/"
2,n t2.21
92r/o
0.00
t4,729.0t
I ,169.00
93V.
sia
7,205,00
i86.00
9216
293.00 300.00
38,667.00 3t,787.80
27E.00 209.00
31,607.00 24,275,79
(iross Nct (rvall) Area 1,106.00
Goss-Nct Factor 97Y.
Page 15
I
I
!
L
I
I
il
!l
,T
I
\
,llt
(.oq) (vou ltrv
Vail Plaza Hotel FILE COPY
Proposal Comparison
(revised l0/lll99)
The following table provides a comparison between the 1998 Vail Plaza Hotel proposal and the most recent 1999
Yail Plaza Hotel proposal
Development
Standard/
Lot Area:
GRFA:
Dwelling
units per acre:
Site coverage:
Setbacks:
front:
sides:
rear:
Height:
Parking:
Com mercial
sq. footage:
Gross Building Area:
Conference/ Meeting
Facility:
Spa Area:
1998 SDD Major
Amendment ProDosal
150,282 sq. ft.
133% or 200,460 sq. ft.
(129,156 sq. fL proposed)
0.29 du/acre
(276 au)
(15 ffu)
(1 du)
62% or 92,637 sq. ft
'12'
5"0"8'&6'
85.75'sloping
87.5' (arch.proj.)
394 parking spaces
six berths
23"h or 47,226 sq. ft-
approx. 395,862 sq. ft.
approx. 21,009 sq. ft.
approx. 27,802 sq. ft.
1999 SDD MaJor
Amendment Prooosal
150,282 sq. ft-
'117o/" or 175,666 sq. ft.
(104,362 sq. fL proposed)
0.29 du/acrs
(98 au)(tttu)
(1 du)
62% or 92,637 sq. fr
5"0"2"&5'
73' sloping
73.75' (arch. proj.)
256 parking spaces
(2'18 new parking spaces)
(42 existing parking spaces)
five berths
26oh or 46,124 sq. ft.
approx. 295,557 sq. ft.
approx. 15,338 sq. ft.
approx. 22,827 sq. ft.
Plus/Minus
No Change
16lo or 24,794 sq. tt.
(- 2d7s4 sq. ft.)
No Change
- 178 au
+29ffu
No Change
No Change
ro
nc, nc, -6, -1..:
- 12.75'
- 13.75'
- 138 parking spaces
- one berth
+3% and - 1 ,102 sq- ft.
- 100,305 sq. ft.
- 5,671 sq. ft.
- 4,975 sq. ft.
Fleveryone\pec\memos\wipc
ri
ag ;gE E €aEE iegl,Fs .H x r. ,E"gEs fi
Eg $E3 i 3 .*.3[ Fgg E $
q
GF.-6 Irlr ii3l s8Er :o' : a 5;!l Eia H -.: * b.!14.1 , sl -i r.- 'i X-s*.r c - s .g[g fXEI H-RH E "r sc E - EH€l {breSa;iogEEp.6UtEld;:-=b:!;9EEEeIl x $sr ; I - b 8q *o ." sE€l EPt s ii Isaosb$ -; R
.E
Ei
at,
(0
;-l s)
-v o$;i-oYe= s.9E E &.== 9 -,-e F Os*S *gd 5 b
sss bg EEE C *
6
, a-E
Ei* 'o '.EI X#E V
-El € Sce g
Ol .: rd,.*H I srr g Eg=l tX Lcnco E -;>l K oPn9=l ct ;e 3'i; ! SX-cl 6 nr=H tr F.tlf zt @ =, i.? c\ (f)
,g $ ,q fr fr t
EE|E! €ff rn s $ e;gflggg5*kRR$f[rs$
Esin bg
3 E;Fg g$ gc gus#tF
F
Lg)
6)
xJ
_)
a<t-
ll,r
o,e
o
Eo
.9,
otr
c6>,'';3o'ait! -cf1-:<
..i
o*urd
ni olocoor c\lt'r-d(D U)
O trtho6bNo
-@ rt)tt;c.i
it.!o
.?i:iilg
engneering Parhs lo ttcns?ottatioa soludons
September 27, :999
Mr. Tim Losa
Zehren and Associates, lnc.
P.O. Box 1976
Avon, Colorado E1620
RE: Supplemental Traffic lmpact Study
Vail Plaza Hotel
FHU Reference No.99-1 99
Dear Mr. Losa:
This letter repon has been prepared to address eccess issues associated with the proposed
Vail Plaza Hotel. The scope of work for this repon is summarized as follows:
r Updatre the site trip generation associated with the cufrent land use program and
compare the estimated trips with the previous trip generataon identificd in our
September 1998 traffic impact study. Trip generation estimates for the existing
development will also be identified,
. Assign site generated vehicle trips to the currently proposed access intersections along
both Vail Road and the South Frontage Road.
. Address traffic aperaligns at each of the proposed access intersections to determine
levels of service and any necessary improvements.
' Address other access issues identified by the Town of Vail-
This lener report supplements the findings of the traffic impact study dated September 1998.
303.72t.\ffi
(ar< 303.?21.08]Z
lhu@{hucng,c(!ut
, sEP 27 '99 LLt44 l-t< FFIU JUJ rzr UOJ4 | u L).4>e>LgJozt r . <)1. lL
,{d0c I lf J
Greenwood Cor?orete Plazr
795I E Maplewmd Avc- Ste. 200
Engle,wtrd,@80lll
sw 27 ',99 tL|44 FR FHU
September 27,1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 2
JV5 '(2L WJl lU LA (V>4> Lt/lEttA t'.t4J/ LL
Vchicle-trip ratcs and cquations documented in Itlpseneration, (lnstitute of Transportatlon
Engineers, Sixth Edition, 1992, werc used to estimate the vehicle-trips generated by the
existing and proposed development. A 50 percent reduction was applied to the traffic
gencrated by the proposed restaurant, lounge, and retail areas, This'internal" trip reductign
is based on the assumption that hotel parrons and condo residents will be the primary user of
these areas and that they will walk to these areas. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation
e$imates associated with the existing development.
Table 1
Existlng Trip Generadon Estirnates
As shown in Table 1 , it is estimared that the site currently generates approximately 1 ,O42 trips
per day. with about 76 trips during the AM peak hour and 9O trips during the PM peak hour.
Table 2 summarizes the trip generation associated with the current development plan. As
shown, rhe currently proposed plan is expected to generated approximately 1,457 trips per day
with a total of 85 trips during the AM peak hour and 127 trips during the PM peak hour-
Condo/
Townhouge
230 22 Dw.llhg
Unit!
r28 3 7 10 7 5 12
Hotel 310 58 Roomr 479 20 12 32 19 17 35
Rc$aurant 831 2 1,OO0's
Sc. Pr.
86 1 0 I 5 2 7
Lounge/B.t '836 1 1,000's
sq- ft-
26 o o o 5 I 4
Markel 852 2 l,OOO's
Sq. Ft.
324 16 17 33 16 15 tt
Totel Tr&c 1,UZ 39 37 76 50 Ito 90
ITE - Insrhute of Tfansportation Engineers
' PM peak hour trips for Lounge/Bar 15% of Daily
5W n ',93 1,1,2 44 FR FHU JtdS ',(ZL busz lU Lv'4J4tLt46t4 r.w'+/LL
'r I
September 27, lggg
Mr Tim Losa
Page 3
Relative to the September 1998 plan, the current plan will generate about 5O percent fewer
vehicle-trips. While the currently proposed plan includes an increased number of condominium
units, it represents a significant dectease in the number of lodging units and commcrcial uses.
The net effect is a significant reduction in trips generated by the Vail Plaza Hotet relative to
the previous proposal.
Trble 2
Trip Generation Esdmatcs - Pruposed Plan
,tr,t'$u.qP'i;,{tf,$#HFl:':,Hs iPil{$fiii
lil;,+i:iii:'
ii;+,6t#;,ti-iii';$liilr'b,.#iiii'j
fiifii;Irlib,,':,:;+ ::' :, t
-.nof1g$r,il
;r:r':elff gfi {i-jisiiE !i{
'f.,|'l'.: .,:::.,.--n
i'i;ruiiititj-r'lt,ffi;lwi $ffilfiffiffi
Condo/
Townhouce
230 50 Dwelling
Units
293 5 17 22 17 10 27
Hotel 310 100 Rooms 823 34 22 56 32 2A 60
Rcstaurant s3r 4 1,000's
sq. ft.
180 2 0 2 10 5 'ts
Lounge/Bar'836 2 1,000's
sq. R.
80 0 o I 4 1Z
Specialty R€tail
Centel
814 4 1,0O0's
Sq. Fl.
81 2 3 5 6 7 13
Toid Tdps - Cunent Plan 1,437 43 42 85 73 54 127
Total Trips - Previous (Seprember rg98l Plan 3.O81 104 73 177 14 115 259
Difference - 1.624
(. s395)
-51 -31 .92
(- 52%)
-71 -61 - 132
(.51%)
ITE - lnstitute of Transponatioh Engin€Ers
r PM peak hour trips fol 19q99/Ee4!:6 !! 3
Forccasted Tnffic Volumes
ln the previous (September 19981 development plan, access to the project was only provided
along the South Frontage Road- In the current plan, the primary access has been moved to
Vail Road, and access to the project site along the Frontage Road will be limited ro
delivery/employee vehicles (refer to the site plao on Figure 1 ). However, access to the existing
Vait Village Inn Phase lll will continue to share access along the Frontage Road-
se 2?'99 11:45 FR FFIJ
September 27, 1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 4
3A3 72L 6832 T0 L97A943LBAA P.A5/LL
The distribution €stimates identified in the September 1998 traffic impact study were used to
assign peak hour site ttaffic (from Table 2) to each of the propos€d access points. The site
generated traffic assignments are summarized on Figure 2.
Background (non-site related) traffig volume forecasts for the year 2Ol5 werc also obtained
from thc September 1998 traffic impast study, and thesc forecasts arc summarized on
Figure 3. The traffic volume forecasts shown on this figure also include traffic aenerated by
the existing Vail Viliage Inn Phase lll condos.
The peak hour site generated traffic volumes from Figure 2 were combined with background
traffic volumes to obtain thc total forecasted lyear 20151 traffic at the she accsss
intersections. These volumes arc summarized on Figure 4.
Traffic Opetations at Propord AcceEE trrbraectiont
Site generated traftic associated with the previous development plan wa6 estimated to account
for loss than 2.3 p€rcent of the total traffic entering the roundabout in the year 2O1 5. The
curren? developmcnt plan will account for less than 1.5 percent of the total entering traffic.
Given this slight change and the significant reduction in forecasted site traffic, the traffic
operational conditions identified in the September 1998 traffic study for the roundabout were
not specifically updated. Instead, thc traffic analysis specifically focuses on the site access
interscctions to determine future levels of service end nccded intersection improvements.
The analysis of the proposed Vail Road acces3 intersections was conducted assuming a
counter-clockwise circulation pattern (internally) through the entry area of the site. The resuhs
of the capacity analyses are summarized on Figure 4 and indicate the following:
r The inbound left-turn along Vail Road (at the southern access) will operate with a
LOS B during the peak hour with a combined through/lE t-turn lane.
r The outbound turning lane onto Vail Road (at the northern accessl will operate with a
LOS D during the peak hour.
r The inbound left-turn at the Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS C or better
during the peak hour.
r The outbound turning lane at the Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS E
during the peak hour, Overall, a relatively low volume of traffic (less than 15 vehicles
per hour) will be subject to this delay- Also, the existing median lane can be used by
left-turning vehicles as a "harbor" area while waiting for an acceptable gap to merge
with westbound traffic.
sEP 1( '99 11:45 FK rF|U
September 27, 1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 5
Jt'J fz.l q,l5Jz I u L> ( 4)qJ LIJAZ)r.ua. LL
Iccess lsszes
As requested by the Town, we have evaluated the close proximiry of the proposed "exit"
driveway along Vail Road to the existing driveway to the Gateway Building. From an
operational or level of service standpoint, it makes little difference if the proposed access is
an "entrance' driveway or an 'exit driveway'r- From a safety standpoint, however, it may not
be desirable to make the nonhern access an n entrance" driveway since it creates an
overlapping left-turn conflict area (1.e. drivers making a nonhbound to westbound left-turn into
the propeny located west of the project site would have difficulty determining whether a
southbound driver was turning left into the Gateway site or the Vail Plaza Hotel)- Therefore,
it is recommended that the nonhern access be an exh only. The access driveways along Vail
Road need to be constructed to allow for no sight obstructions (walls, trees, shrubs, etc)
between them. This will rnaximize driver visibility and improve safety'
Along the Frontage Road, trucks will need to be able to back into the delivery area on the north
side of the propeny, Due to on-site space limnations, this maneuver would be done from a
proposed parallel (detached) tuming lane along the south side of the Frontage Road. Since this
parallel lane is separated lrom the through traffic on the Frontage Road by a raised island, we
do not anticipare any off-site traffic conflicts. Howevcr, in order to ensure one-way operation
atong this parallet access, it is recommended that "Do Not Enter" signs be posted at the east
end near the edge of the Frontage Road.
TheColoradoDepartmentofTransponation,s|cDoT|Wwasuti]ized
to determine if auxiliary right-turn acceleration and deccleration lanes would be required for the
proposed Fronrage Road access. The State Code requires right-turn deceleration lanes when
the forecasted right-turn volume is greater than 5O vehicles per hour. A right-turn acceleration
lane is only required by the State on single lane roadways with posted speeds greater than 4O
mph and aright-turn volume greater than 50 vehicles per hour. Based on the forecasted traffic
volumes identified on Figure 4, none of the State's auxiliary lane requirements would be met.
Summary
. The curent development plan is expected to generated approximately 1,457 trips per
day with a total of 85 trips during the AM peak hour and 127 trips during the PM peak
hour. The current plan will generate about 50 percent fewer trips than the previous
(September 1998) Plan.
r lt is recommended that the nonhern site access along Vail Road be an 'exit" only, as
proposed. The outbound turning lane onto Vail Road will operate with a LOS D during
the Peak hour'
w 2? '99 L!,45 FR Ft-tu
Septcmber 27, 1999
Mr Tim Losa
Page 6
3143 ',(ZL ZIELJZ rU L> ('4>era Ll,il[J r.g(/ LL
It is recommended that the southern site access along Vail Road be an 'entrance" only,
as proposed. The inbound left-tum will operate with acceptable levels of seruice
(LOS Bl during the peak hour with a combined through/left-tum lane. A left-turn pocket
should not be needed along Vail Road.
There should be no sight obstrustions (wall3, trees, shrubs, etc) berween the northern
access and thc existing Gateway accsss along Vail Road to minimize potential turning
conflicts.
The inbound left-turn at the Frontege Road access will operate with a LOS C or better
during the Peak hour.
The outbound turning lane at thE Frontage Road access will operate with a LOS E
during the peak hour. Overall, a reladvely low volume of traffic (less than 15 vehicles
per hour) wilt be subJect ro this delay. Also, the existing meclian lans can be used by
left-tuming vchicles as a 'harbor" area while waiting tor an acceptable gap to merge
with w*tbound traffic.
No off-site traffic conflicts are anticipated between the proposed parallel access lane
and the Frontage Road due to rhe proposed raised island. Howcver, it is recommended
that'Do Not Enter' signs be posted in orderto ensure one'way (eastbound) operation
along this parallel access.
Based on the forecasted traffic volumes identified on Figure 4, none ol the State's
auxiliary lane requirements would be met. That is, neither a right-rurn deceleration lane
or a right-turn acceleration lane would be warranted according lo tlhe State Highwav
Access Code.
tf you have any questions regarding our findings, please call.
Sincerely
FELSBURG HOLT & ULTA/rc
Attachments
Lawrence C. Lang
FCos
=o-flE
U)
s,FP 2'l ',99 1L:4b FK rFflJ JYJJ (aL tsfoJa, r|. L2 a Z)71>LEJO!J
o
o
tl
o
E!
rl
\-3
o
Eil
K<!
e!!I
a
-i
-tt
K<!
VP 2? '99 1.TI# FR FHJ
*ts.a4> -_/2J-
343 ?2L 6832 TO L9n949tffi P.W\L
Srg
t-g<-l
66J Vail
NEPo-tED=traa
cn
C)
(6
o
6
fx
t-1
f2
fn
o
tlTL
rl-t
t
\<7
N
6\l
ryo
#*sra
ll rl
xSTT
€
q,
6'c
o
<t
8.9
F=B€
+r1:o8,3o_F>.9o- (/)
oz
lJl(t
urJoao45h>
n:-rai
=\.rJ
oj
e/
+Yr
E
3
t
i
!4
t
w3 ?21 8832 TO L9?E94.9LtcE,sl P.LV/TLw 27 ',99 LL.& FR Fl-{.J
o(l)
E
E
.9
o
F
=lc
=o
CDJ
C)(!
d)
a) |4tg5
6 C\lEhIE+:l=-i=E
!E=o>5irtz2E
i
I
I
I
rd
E
t-s
56
!tctlOC\|lI)
tltl
+f-tl
ig
c
6A|
oltt
@
rg\ul\o\
:
arto
E
s
.s2
E
T
.:<$.)(L
Eo.
tl
xxxo4a4,ft.)6:s
;:'i v/ J
o
r
!I
!
-.E
o-
93 ?21, g€32 70 LE?gyglAeA P . LL/LLsE 2? ',99 1-L.46 FR Fru
17424
.t)E
.9
=t,cooo
(E
(6
.o
$los5e(\lirbI
--"----------'l
\roa+
(g\\u\o\\'
66 --:l7€8-
t-g
..+976
I x{
J-i
t
\*.'
6l
rat6l
a@
@ .-(D
9.3
=6do>:oIges6FJ
=5oo
IJ.v:gg66.:48r?_
=>9L O- Cr)
ullI
l{,1
$7 oz
rJlolltJodo4Dt.)ai3i:ivJ
N.
a-./-
ro* TOTRL PRGE.11 xck
Ad0c I lf J
J.
To: Ceorge Ruther
From: Greg Hall
Date: October 19, 1999
Subject: Vail Plaza Hotel
I have reviewed the latest submittal of the Vail Plaza Hotel and have the following
comments that will need to be addressed.
l.The site plan layout should be corrected to reflect the survey provided. The curb
shown for the frontage road is actually the pan and the existing curb is 2' further
towards the site. This reduces the landscape area by the 2' width and also
compromises the ability to tum out.
The curb line on Vail road is inaccurate as well, with the existing curb closer to the
building as is shown, this is most pronounced at the gateway property line. The width
of Vail road will need to drawn correctly as the width is 28' at Phase 5 not 36' as
shown.
The loading and delivery scherne will need to address the vehicles we had previously
stated which included placement of the following AASHTO desigrr vehicles, I ,
WB6o semi (65' long) off of the travel way, The current configuration does not allow
for this vehicle to maneuver into the space. If it does park in the lane for the loading
and delivery it will block access out and may cause cars to exit the wrong way which
is a very dangerous situation.
The ability to maneuver and park:
2, WB-40 semis (50 feet long) the WB-40 cannot use the drive lane as drawn.
3, SU-30 single unit trucks.(30' long).
In addition the trash system will need to be identified and its operation shown
independently ofthe loading and delivery operation. The previous underground
tunnel to the other phases ofthe plan has been removed. It should be reinstated.
The site plan needs to show the maneuvers of the 40' over the road coaches.
Provide the site improvements discussed previously and show these. Curb gutter and
walk to crossroads, including street lights, improvements to the bus stop and E
Meadow drive, street lighting consistent with the village streetscape lights,
landscaped median to the frontage road, any necessary drainage improvements
associated with the offsite improvements. The material and extent of these
improvements will be discussed once shown,
The parallel roadway scheme is inconsistent with the adjacent improvements of the
frontage road. It creates a hole and additional asphalt in an area where the goal is to
lessen the visual affect of asphalt not increase it. This will need to be studied once
the driveway and site plan are corrected to meet the survey and standards to
determine the affects of the frontage road and roundabout operations. How will we
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
ensure one way operation? Left tums out may be prohibited. It will need to be
approved by the state DOT for ar access permit.
9. This access is inconsistent with the driveway standards for commercial developments.
The minimum angle with the frontage road is 70 degrees or a variance from 90 of 20
degtees. This must be held for 30'before the drive can angle greater than allowed.
Since this driveway does not meet these standards additional restrictions on the access
of the operations will be required to prohibit left tums in and out. A landscaped
median will need to be provided to accomplish this.
10. This plan also moves the access 40' closer to the roundabout where the concem of
rear end accidents is an issue.
I l. The driveways will need to provide for adequate sight distance of l0' by 250' sight
triangles measured back from the flow line of the roadway.
12.The driveways will need to provide 8' wide concrete pans.
I 3. The drive beyond the pans can only be at a maximum of 4o/o for the fi rst 30'.
14. This development will need to address the offsite roadway impacts that have been
applied to new approvals in the Lionshead area this equates to approximately $3788
for each additional unit, the town has then paid 20% ofthis fee. The Conference area
and Spa will require additional payment but it is not known at this time. Some of the
offsite improvements may be credited against this dollar amount ( the landscape
median beyond the site, and depending on how employee haffic numbers and parking
spaces are provided or not the sidewalk to Village Cmter Chute).
15. The close proximity of the west exit driveway to the driveway of the gateway is an
issue. The rigbt out and gateway left out turning movements with little separation for
allowing reaction time is a safety issue.
16. The shading of the walks and the need to heat the walks and drives will be required.
17. The width of the walk on Vail road will need to be 8' per the Vail Streetscape plan
and with what exists. The width of the walk along the frontage road is 6 '. The walks
are to be heated paver walks along all of the SDD boundaries. Beyond the boundaries
match existing or provide concrete.
18. The alignment of the walk along the frontage road will need to be better designed to,
avoid vegetation and remove the huge curve at the east property line where it crosses
the exit driveway.
19. Please address the impacts during construction.
20. The requirement to provide the access to the condos to the east drives a lot of this
design. It appears that they have access and providing thern access but not
convenient access does it meet their requirements? Are the two parking structures
connected as required by the original SDD? The will need to be connected to allow
vehicles to flow form one to the other.
2 I . The grading plan will need to show spot elevations to the nearest tenth of a foot along
the length of the road way hontage and where adjacent properties are met.
22. T\e plan needs to show existing and adjacent vegetation being impacted.
()rowx
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452
October 21, 1 999
Tim Losa
hoject Manager
Zehren & Associates, Inc.
48 East Beaver Creek Boulevard
Avon, Colorado 81620
Re:Vail Plaza Hotel
Dear Tim.
Thank you for appearing bcfore ihe Town of Vail Design Review Board on Wednesday, October 20, 1999, for a
second conceptual review ofthe proposed Vail Plaza Hote.l.
The purpose of this letter is to provide you rvith a written summary of the Board's cornments. The lbllowing is a list
of the comments:
The tedesigned tower at the southeast comer of the hotel still does not provide adequate pcdestian circulation.
The tower design needs to be incorporated and integrated into the design of the hotel. The goal of the redesign
is to sigificantiy open up the space and reduce the restrictive nature of the current desig!.
The spaces between t^he buildings (Phase III, Phase V & Gateway) are not acceptable. The walkway along the
northside of the hotel leading to the Gateway Building must be provided. The design of the walkrvay shall be
interesting and inviting. The drivcrvay ramp leading down inro the parking structure should be increased in
slope to the maximum allowed to increase the size of the plaza area above. Thc proposal to incorporate
archways and gates in the areas bctween the buildings is good. Thc archways and gates should varying in size
and appearance, yet maintain an overall recogniztble therne.
The walkway between thc pool area and the Phasc I buildings must be increased in r.vidth. lhe goal of the
change is to improve the feei and floi,v of pedestrian traffic throughor"rt the District. The proposed open rail
designis good. Plcasc provide section drarvings of Lhe prxrl tieck retaininswalls to ii.lustrate landscape planter
dcsigr and sizes. Overall. rhc ntx>l deck design rvith re cascading pools is verlz altrirctive.
(icater arlicularittu ilusi be rnilotiuccd irlilriLl ihc Soudi Fr'oirto!:e Roari. .-\s tirsr_slreti ihe !trcci,,logc is tu)
.strarght iurd lirtear mtl does irot contbrm rvitir lhe Vail Viilage Urban Dcsis] Considerarions. A rninimum oia
1{)-fbot of}\et shirll bc providcd.
The Vail Road and South Frontage Road propcrty line discrepancies must be resolvcd prior lo the Board
commenting on the proposed Vail Road setback. The Board is interested in ensuring that the suectscapc along
Vail Road is atuaslive, well-landscaped and invitins.
{go"ouor**
The Vail Plaza Hotel is tenatively scbeduled for a third conceptual review by tbe Desigp Review Board on
Wednesday, Novernber 3, 1999. In ader to remain ou he Board's agenda yor will need to zuknit r.uhlonc by no
later than noon" Thursday, October 2E, 1999 to the Cormrraity Dewloprrcnt Dcparurcot.
I hope this letter is helpful in clarifying the Bmrd's cocnnents. Shodd yur lrave any qucstions or concerns, please
ftd ftee to call. You caq reach me by telephw at 479-2145.
Siocercln
il^*-R.tlr-t
Geqge Ruthci,AICP
Senic Speciat Rojccts Planner
Town of Vail
Xc: VailTownConcil
Town ofVail Planning & Envhmmental Commission
WddirPra&
,
OFVAILOor,lry
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452
FILE r;r,P:r
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Tim Losa
hoject Ma"ager
Zehren & Associates
48 East Beaver Creek Boulevard
Avon. Colorado 81620
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel
Dear Tirn,
Thank you for appearing beforc the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission on Monday, October 25,
1999, for a worksession to continue discussions regarding the major amendment to Special Development District
No.6 and the redeveiopment of the Vail Village Inn.
In ligbt of our discussion yesterday, I thought it would be helpful for me to reiterate the general comments, issues
and concems, expressed to date, regarding the Vail Plaza Hotel proposal. .The purpose of this letter .is to provide you
with a written list of the issues.
The following is list of the issues expressed over the course of the developmcnt review process:
a The site survey and the site plan do not match. There is a discrepancy in the location of thc property line
relative to the location of Vail Road and the South Frontage Road. The discrepancy issue must be resolved
prior to any decisions or recommendations being made regarding the Vail Road setback requirernents and thc
loading/delivery access grades and required landscape screeni''g.
B A grading plam must be submitted for review. The grading plan shall be prcpared at a scale of 1"=20' or larger
and illustratc existing and proposed gradcs, the proposed foundation layout of all proposed buildings and
stmctures, the proposed driveways, including percent slope with spot elevations at the propcrty line, garage
slabs, entry slabs, deck elevations, top,&ottom stairway clcvations, and top,bottom retaining wall elevations.
tr The location, height and the design of the proposed retaining/site rvalls are importanr. Plcasc submit detailed
cross-section drawings and elevation drawings ofall proposed retaining/sitc walls.
o The Vail Village Masler Plan govems the development of the site along with the other relcvant Town planning
documents. It is important to clearly articulate how the proposal complies with the master plan (building
heipfut, sctbacks, circulation, urban design considerations, etc.) A compelling argument and pubiic benefits
shall be demonstrated by the applicant that outweighs the negative impacts ofdeviations from the underlying
zoning development standards.
o The parking plan needs to be revised. As presently designed adequate circulation is not provided to all the
proposed parking spaces. All proposed parking spaces shall meet minimum tuming radius requirements. The
{S*n*rr ro
proposed spaces ofgreatest concem are those spaces proposed at the very ends ofdrive aisles next to the
foundation wall.
The proposed parking at Phase V is problematic. The current design. requires vehicles backing out of the spaces
to back into an opposing traffic flow and across the sidewalk. A redesigned solution shall be presented.
The proposed loading/delivery area must be desigred to meet minimum traffic safety issues. These issues
include sight distance, acccss and exit angles, &iveway slope and width, tuming radii, etc. The minimum
standards for commercial development can be found in the Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook.
The specific issues with tbe loading/delivery proposal are also outlined in the memo drafted by Greg Hali,
dated October 19.1999.
The front entry porte cochere must be designed to meet minimum taffic maneuvering requirements. This
includes providing a 360 degree twning radius to accommodate a Chevy Suburbantype ofvehicle. This radius
shall not be impeded by parking spaces, landscaping, sidewalks, etc.
It is imperative that pedestrian site circulation be addressed. Attractive and inviting pedestrian spaces and
building entrances need to be provided. These spaces shall address pedestrian scale, provide minimum l0-foot
wide walkways, street lighting, landscaping, etc. A specific area that needs to be addressed is at the south east
comer of the hotel at the East Meadow Drive entrance.
The off-site improvements plan needs additional detailed information. Since the major amendment, when
approved, will become the official document illustrating the development rights of the property, detailed
infbrmation is needed. The off-site improvements plan shall illustrate the extent of the improvements, the width
of sidewalks, snowmelt system locations, the type of paving, the desigr of streetscape fumishings, the street
ligbt locations, etc. The Town will require a Developer Improvement Agreement prior to second reading of an
amendine ordinance.
B The proposed building height and mass adjacent to the cornmon prop€rty linc south of the Gateway Plaza
Building needs to be revisited. Options to breaking up the east-west oriented ridge line should be presented.
The purpose of breaking up the ridge line is to increase the availability oflight and air to adequately reach the
Gateway Plaza Building and the reduce the negative impact of the proposed building height deviation on
adjacent properties.
o The pedestrian sidewalk and building entrance on the north side of the hotel needs to be placed back on the
plans. The sidewalk shall be desigred to be as attractive and inviting as possible given the physical constraints.
In addition to the items listed above, please refer to concspondence previously sent on August 26, September 1,
September 30, October 13, and October 21. Many of the issues listed in this letter arc dcscribcd in grcater delail in
the previous correspondence. Please contact me ifyou need copies of the letters.
The Planning & Environmental Commission has requested that you respond to each of the issues identified to date
comprchcnsively at the next worksession meeting. I have tcntatively scheduled the ncxt worksession meeting with
the Commission for Monday, Novcmber 22, 1999. In order lo remain on that agenda, rcviscd plans addrcssing eacb
of thc issues rvill need to be submitted to tho Community Development Department by no iater than 9:00 am,
Nlonday, Novcmber 8, 1999. Pending the outcome of the discussions on Novcmber 22, the Torvn staffrvill be
rccommending ar final rcvicrv and recornmendation on Nlon&ry, December ll, 1999.
Should you have any questions with regard to the information addressed in this letter, please do not hesitate to call.
You can reach me by telephone at 479-2145.
Sincerely,
MR'*t*r
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Greg Hall, Director of Public Works
Jay Peterson
Waldir Prado
Xc:
)-t r,[ t r;rJP]r
Oro.rr.l-
favr.\
OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2 138
FAX 970-479-2452
November I I, 1999
Tim Losa
hoject Manager
Zehren & Associates, Inc.
48 East Beaver Creek Boulevard
Avon" Colorado 81620
Re: Revised Vail Plaza Hotel Development Review Schedule
Dear Tim,
Pursuant to our telephone conversation this moming, the development review schedule for the Vail Pl:"a Hotel has
been revised. The schedule has been revised at the applicant's rcquest. The purpose of this letter is to provide you
with written documentation of the revised schedule and amended deadlines.
The site visit and evening worksession schcduled for November 16th with the Vail Town Council has been
postponed. The site visit and worksession have been postponed until Tuesday, December 7ft.
The worksession scheduled for Monday, November 22nd with the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental
Commission has been tabled to the next available meeting. The next available meeting is Monday, December 13d
at 2:00 p.m. In order to remain on the agenda for the December 13'n meeting, please have all reviscd plans and
materials submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department by no later than noon, Tuesday,
November 23,1999.
The final review and recommendation by the Planning & Environmental Commission is now scheduled for Monday,
January 10, 2000. To remain on the agenda for the January l0'h meeting, please submit the final proposed set of
plans and materials to the Town of Vail Commrurity Developmcnt Departrnent by no later than noon, Tuesday,
Deccmber 2 I ".
The conccptual rcview by the Town of Vail Design Review Board is still scheduled for Wednesday, Novembcr 17'h
at 4:00 in the Vail Town Council Charnbers. Pending the outcome of the discussions at that meeting, we will
discuss and schedule a date for a t'inal review and recommcndation from the Desiprr Review Board to the Vail Town
Council.
Should you have any qucstions or concems rvith regard to thc information addressed in this lener, please do not
hcsitatc to call. You czur reach me bv teleohone aI479-2145.
Sincerelv.il .-,
I .).rn- r-c .-' Ku-Ll'*1
George RutheC AICP
Senior Special Projects Plan"er
Town of Vail
Xc: Waldir Prado (via fax)
{S u"n*or r"o
rlt
12-78^7
the building owner's authorized agent
or representative on a form provided
by the Administrator. Any application
for condominiumized buildings shall
be authorized by the condominium
association in conformity with all perti-
nent requirements of the condominium
association's declarations.
2. Application Contents: An applica-
tion for an exterior alteration shall
include the following:
a. A completed application form,
filing fee, and a list of all owners of
property located adjacent to the sub-
ject parcel. A filing fee shall not be
collected for any exterior alteration
which is only for the addition of an
exterior dining deck; however, all
other applicable fees shall be re-
quired. The owner's lisl shall include
the names of all owners, their mailing
address, a legal description of the
property owned by each, and a gener-
al description of the property (includ-
ing the name ol the property, il appli-
cable), and the name and mailing
address of the condominium
association's representative (il appli-
cable). Said names and addresses
shall be obtained from the current tax
records of Eagie County as they ap-
peared not more than thirty (30) days
prior to the application submittal date.
b. A written statement describing
the proposal and how the proposal
complies with the Vail Village Urban
Design Guide Plan and the Vail Vil-
lage Urban Design Considerations,the Vail Village Master Plan,
Sireetscape fulaster Flan, and any
other relevant sections of the Vail
Comorehensive Plan.
12-78-7
c. A survey stamped by a licensed
surveyor indicating existing conditions
on the property including the location
of improvements, topography, and
natural features.
d. A current title report to verify
ownership, easements, and other
encumbrances, including Schedules A
and B'.
e. Existing and proposed site plan
at a scale ol one inch equals ten feet,
(1'= 10'), a vicinity plan at an appro-
priate scale to adequately show the
project location in relationship to the
surrounding area, a landscape plan at
a scale of one inch equals ten feet
(1" = 10'), a roof height plan, and
existing and proposed building eleva-
tions at a minimum scale oi
one-eighth inch equals one foot
(t/r" = 1'). The material listed above
shall include adjacent buildings and
improvements as necessary to dem-
onstrate the project's compliance with
urban design criteria as set forth in
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide
Plan, Vail Village Design Consider-
ations, the Vail Village Master Plan,
the Streetscape Master Plan, and any
otheq relevant sections of the Vail
Comprehensive Plan.
I t. Sun/shade analysis of the exist-
I ing and proposed building for the
I spring/fall equinox (March 21lsep-I tember 23) and winter solstice (De-
I cember 21) at ten o'clock (10:00) A.M.
\ and two o'clock (2:00) P.M., unless
\ tne Department OJ Communiiy Devel-
\ opment of the Town determines that
\ ihe proposed addition has no impact
\ on the existing sun/shade pattern. The
11, following sun angle shall be used
\ when preparing this analysis:
1. Schedules A and B, referred to herein, refer to Schedules A and B of the title report.
1298
Town of Vail
t
12-78-7
Spring/Fall
Equinox
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Winter
Solstice
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Sun Anqle
40' east of south,
42" west of south,
Sun Anqle
3O" east of south,
30o west of south,
50" declination
50" declination
20'declination
20o declination
g. Existing and proposed floor plans
at a scale of one-fou rth inch equals
one foot ('/o" = 1') and a square foot-
age analysis ol all existing and pro-
poseo uses.
h. An architectural or massing mod-
el of the proposed development. Said
model shall include buildings and
major site improvements on adjacent
properties as deemed necessary by
the Administrator. The scale of the
model shall be as determined bv the
Administrator.
i. Photo overlays and/or other
graphic material to demonstrate the
relationship of the proposed develop-
ment to adjacent properties, public
spaces, and adopted views per Chap-
ter 22 ol this Title.
j. Any additional information or
material as deemed necessary by the
Administrator or the Town Planningand Environmental Commission
(PEC), The Administrator or the Plan-
ning and Environmental Commission
may, at his/her or their discretion,
waive certain submittal requirements if
it is determined that the requirements
are irot i'elevani io the croposeC de-
velopment nor applicable to the urban
design criteria, as set forth in the Vail
Village Urban Design Guide Plan and
12-78-7
Vail Village Design Considerations
and any other relevani sections of the
Vail Comprehensive Plan.
3. Application Date And Proceduresl:
Complete applicaiions for major exte-
rior alterations shall be submitted
biannually on or before the fourth
Monday ol February or the fourth
Monday of September. Submittal re-
ouirements shall include all informa-
tion listed in subsection A2 ol this
Section; provided, however, that the
archiiectural or massing model shall
be submitted no later than three (3)
weeks prior to the first formal public
hearing of the Planning and Environ-
mental Commission. No public hear-
ings or work sessions shall be sched-
uled regarding eliterior alterations
prior to the biannual submittal date
deadlines. At the next regularly sched-
uled Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting following the
submittal dates listed above. the Ad-
ministrator ihall inform the Planning
and Environmental Commission of all
exterior alteration submittals. The
Administrator shall commence with the
review ol e)derior alterations following
this initial Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting.
a. A property owner may apply for a
major exterior alteration (greater than
1OO square feet) in any year during
which he or she shall submit an appli-
cation on the February or September
dates as set forth in subsection A3 of
this Section. Said aoplication shall be
termed a "major exterior alteration".
c. \orwiihstandrng lhe ioreocrng,
applications for the alteration of an
existing building which adds or re-
moves any enclosed floor area of not
1. The submittal deadlines contained in this subsection A3 are hereby waived for project applications tor the
1998 calendar year.
Town of Voil
1298
()romt OFVAIL
Department of Community D evelopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 138
FAX 970-479-2452
November 16,1999
Waldir Prado
Daymer Corporation
100 East Mcadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Sent Via Fax:4764697
Rc: Revised Vail Plaza Hotel Dcvelopment Review Schedule
Dear Mr. Prado,
The purpose of this letter is to follow up on our meeting of this aftemoon to discuss the developmcnt review
schedule for thc Vail Plaza Hotel and to provide you with written documentation of the revised schedule.
At your requcst, I have revised the agenda for the December 13, 1999 Planning & Environmental Commission
meeting. The revised agenda includes your request for a firnl revicw and recommendation of thc major amendment
of Special Devclopment District #6 and the requcst for a conditional use permit to allow for the operation ofa
fractional fee club. The Town will mail notice of the public hearing to the adjacent property owners.
As promised, I have also scheduled a worksession meeting with the Vail Town Council. At this time the
worksession item has becn placed on the agenda for the Deccmber 14m meeting. I will confirm this date with you
once we bavc met with the Town Council on Decenrber 7s.
Should you havc any questions or concems, pleasc do not hesitate to call. You can rcach me by telephone at 479-
2145
Sincerelv.
R,r*l-a
Senior Special hojects Planner
Town of Vail
{P'"n"'"o'n'"r
../. ::ti:* i
Gateway Condominium Assoc.
stolu Bros., Ltd.
'0 Marker st., suite 300
inington, DE 19801Ih: Keith D. Stoltz
Colorado Dept. of Transponafion
C/o Jim Nall
606 So. 9'n street
Grand Junclion, GO 81501
Sonnenalp Hotel
82 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Trevina Ltd.
C/o Maxine Miller
143 E. Meadow Drive, Suite 499A
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Village Inn Plaza Condo Assoc.
r&tl
C/o Slifer Management
143 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Alpine Standard
28 South Frontage Rd. Wesl
Vail, CO 81657
Holiday House Gondominiums
9 Vail Road
Vail, CO 81657
Village Inn Plaza Condo Assoc.
Phase lll and Phase V
C/o Joseph Staufer
100 East Meadow Drive
Vail, GO 8165/
FirstBank
17 Vail Road
Vail, CO 81657
Crossroads Condo Assoc.
C/o Maxine Miller
143 E. Meadow Drive, Suite 499A
Vail, CO 8165/
g,if t:i i';i s39!gs3; 8sfr rq; ijSSSti$ te€:g tr j0ii iI $
F THIS ITEM MAY AFFE.T Y.UR PR.PEHT
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will-hold a public hearing_in qqcorda4ce with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on December 13, 1999, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipia eulHing. tn
consideration of:
A request for a final review of a major amendment, to allow for the proposed redevelopment of
the Vail Village Inn, Phase lV, within Special Development District No.'6, and a conditional use
permit, to allow for the operation of a fractional fee club in the Public Accommodation Zone
\ ,District, located at .l00 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N, & O, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
{ppti""nr' Daymer corporation, represented by Jay peterson
J Planner: George Ruther
A request for a final review of_a redevelopment proposal involving a rezoning, conditional use
permit revision and developmllnt plan approval for Ski Club Vail, located at 598 Vail Valley Dr./
Part of Tract B, Vail Village 7"'Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Ski Club Vail, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Brent Wilson
A worksession for a conditional use permit, to allow for the expansion of Buffehr Creek Park,
located at 1950 Chamonix/Lot 34, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Allison Ochs
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Devefopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published December 10, 1999 in the VailTrail.
VNL UILLAGE INN - VAIL PLAA HOTEL
To
Department of Community Development
Vail, CO
Att.: Mr. George Ruther
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel Development Schedule
Dear George
1 - The purpose of this lefter is to comment on your Nov.17 letter in which you wam us that "it appeam at
this time we will be wriilng a menprandum to tJre Planning & Envirornental Commission recorneoding
denial ofthe curent proposal".
2 - We would like to make a little recap of the facts:
a) - Aner various successive work sessions with PEC and DRB, we ended with recommendations on
specific items:
a.1) - They would like to see a "rnoreinviting" entrance from Meadow drive (where the liquor$or€ is).
a.2) - A detailed demonstration that the proposed delivery location on Frontage rd. func{ions well.
a.3) - They would like to see a demonstration of the average set back on Vail road and that the
radius of the lum around" at the Vail rd. entrance shoud provide for a suburban vehide to tum.
a.4) - The northeast poftion of the building on Frontage rd. should be pushed out some, to break the
continuity between our front facade and the Village Inn Condominiuns (phase lll) located to th€
east.
b) - Those issues, with the exception of item a.4, were adressed in the package that we submitted on
Nov. 8. On Nov. 1 1 we advised the staff that we would submit in the ne)d few days the solulion for the
recommendation a.4 and make minor changes.
c) As a consequence of 'b" above we worked with you and it was established thal we should submit a
new package until noon Nov.23.
3 - On your Nov 17 letter above mentioned you kindly ofier that nve could contact you by telephone to
schedule a meeting.
You delivered your letter to Connie Dorsey at evening of that day after the DRB meeting.
Early next day we started to call your office to schedule the meeting and left message. We
repeated the call a number of times during the day until late that day when we got a message that
you would not be available next day and the entire following week.
4 - Unfortunately we will have to submit the new s€t of plans on No\r. 23 as scheduled, without the
oportunity to prwiously go over it with you.
We are convinc€d that the concerns expressed in your Nov. 17 letler are satisfactorily resolved,
as they are in the package to be submited on Nov- 23.
In fact, in the meeting when we recefued your letter, the DRB alrcady expressed their satisfaction
with the solutions to their recommendstions.
5 - We will appreciate that upon your retum you set a meeting with Jay Pelerson and/or Tim Losa to go
over the plans for the next PEC meeting.
Wsldir Prado - President
Vail Mllage Inn
Thank you.
Sincerely
c0PyFIL E
Onry OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 t 38
MX 970-479-2452
MEMORANDUM
To: Town of Vail Design Review Board
From: CommunityDevelopmentDepartmcnt
Date: Dccember 1, 1999
Re: Vail Plaza Ho1el . Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council
In entioipation ofappearing before the Vail Town Council for first reading ofan amending ordinance tg allow for
the redevelopment of Phase IV ofthe Vail Village km Special Development District, the applicant has requested a
preliminary recommendation from the Design Review Board.
Pursuanl to the Towr Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demol.ition within the corporate limits
ofthe Town unless dcsip approval has been granted in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 1 i of the Town Code."
Should the Design Review Board choose to make a preliminary recommcndation of approval to the Vail Town
Council on the rcdevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, staff would suggest that the following finding and
conditions be rnade part ofthe recomrnendation:
"IJpon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board
finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structures, the hotel's surroundings and with Vail's
cnvironmenl. The Board li:rther finds that the proposal is in compliance wiLh the applicable provisions of the
Design Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 1l of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan & Urban
Design Considcrations. Therefore, the Board recommends approval of rhe redevclopment proposal for the Vail
Plaze Hotel. The Board's rccommendation of approval caries with it the following conditions:
1. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final of-site improvements plan, and outdoor lighting
plan in accordance rvith the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulations for review and approval of the
Design Review Board.
That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and
approval ofthe Design Revierv Board.
That the applicant submits a comprehensive sip program proposal for the Vail Plaza l{otel.
That the applicant submits a root'-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-
top mechanical equipment shall bc enclosed and screened from public vierv.
,l
4.
{,7 *'"'""o '^""
()rowx OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
VaiI, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
December 1, 1999
East Viilage Homeowner's AssociationAttn: Jim Lamont
P.O. Box 238
Vail, Colorado 81657-0238
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel
I)ear Jim,
Thank you for meeting with me this moming to briefly discuss the proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
As I mentioned, the Town of Vail planning & Environmental Commission will be holding a public hearing on
Monday, December l3th to make a formal recommendation to the Vail Town Council on thsredevelopment
proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
In the spirit of cooperation, and lcrowing the East Village Homeowner's Association's continued interest in the
redevelopment proposal, I am sending you this letter to request tho Association's input on the proposal.
Over the course of the development review process for the hotel proposai you have expressed concems on behalf of
&e Association. As I presently understand, the Association's primary concemr 3rg lsading/delivery capabilities,
traffic impacts and compliernce with the applicable land pianning documents. I would geatiy appreciate written
cornments from tle Association so that I may share them in advance with the applicant and incorporate them into the
staff memorandum. In order to share the written comments with the applicant and to incorporate them into the staff
memorandum I would need the comments by no later than Wednesday, December 8'o . I am hopcful you can fulfill
this request. However, if you are unable to fulfill my request, the Association's comments can be presented by
yourself or others at the public hearing.
If necessary, I arn available to meet with you and the members of the Association to go over the plans and answer
zmy questions you may have. If you would iike to meet, please contact me by telephone at 479-2145 to schedule a
mutually convenient time.
Again, I am bopeful you can fulfill my request and I look forward to the Association's continued participation in the
development review process for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
Sincerclv-
Senior Special Projects. Planner
Town of Vaii
{p *""nuororo
Aeoza<
3.
Pam Brandmeyer
4.
Steve Thompson
5.
Dominic Mauriello
Tom Moorhead
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEiIBER 7, 1999
7:00 P.M. lN TOV COUNG|L CHAMBERS
RH'EEDAGEI{DA .
NorE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon todetermine at what time Gouncil will consider an item.
1.
z.
CITIZEN PARTICIPAT|ON. (5 mins.)
CONSENTAGENDA: (5 mins.)A. Approve the Minutes from the meetings of November 2 and 16,
1999.
Appoint Two Members to the Vail Local Marketing District Advisory
Board. (5 mins.)
Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999, first reading of An Ordinance Making
Supplemental Appropriations And Budget Adjustments From The town Of
Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, And Health lnsurance Fund Of
The 1999 Budget And The Financial Plan For The Town Of Vail, Colorado;
And Authorizing The Expenditures Of Said Appropriations As Set Forth
Herein; And Setting Forth Details In Regard Thereto. (15 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance
No. 3, Series of 1999, on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This is the finat supptemental
appropriation for 1999. Supplemental appropriations are needed to
account for expenditures that were not anticipated when the budget was
originally prepared.
Many of the Town's required supplemental appropriations are caused by
and funded by unanticipated revenue such as grants and sales. All of the
supplementals in the General Fund are of this type.
Supplementals are also needed for unanticipated expenditures such as
the upgrade to the permits software for $66,000.
The balance of supplementals is needed for expenditures that will exceed
budget estimates such as the $120,000 needed for health claims. As you
may recall, we are self-insured for health claims and must pay what is
incurred up to a certain point. For many years, our health claims had
done much betterthan budget, but not this year.
STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: Approve Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999
on first reading.
Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1999, first reading of an Ordinance rezoning
for property previously unzoned and owned by the United States Forest
Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land
Ownership Adjustment Agreement to primary/Secondary Residential
District and Natural Area Preservation District (NAPD), for property
located at Rockledge Road/ A replat of a portion of Block Z, Vail Village
First Filing and Lot 2 of Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4,1 ,8A and 9A, Block 7, VailVillage First Filing; Lots 3A and 3b,
Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vait Milage First Filing; Lot 10A,
Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 VailVillage First Filing; Lot 138
Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7 Vail village First Filing; and Govemment
o.
Gary Goodell
Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range g0 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian.
and
A rezoning for property previously unzoned and owned by the United
states Forest service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the
Land Orynership Adjustment Agreement to primary/Secondary
Residential District and NaturalArea preservation District (MpD), for
property located at Ptarmigan Road/ Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, Vail
Village Seventh Filing, replat of Lot 4, VailVillage Tenth Filing and
Government Lot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range g0 West of
the Sixth Principal Meridian. (45 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF VA|L TOWN COUNCTL: Approve/Modify/Deny
Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1999 on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: See attached memo.
STAFF RECOMIi|IENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning
requests subject to the following finding:
That the proposed zone districts are compatible with and suitable
to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town,s Land Use plan
and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area.
Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1999, an ordinance amending Tifle 10, Building
Regulations, of the Municipal code, to provide for some relatively minoi
updates and "clean-up" amendments to the town's adopted building codes.
The ordinance is tentatively scheduled for 2nd reading on December 22 and
is proposed to be effective for all building permit applications received after
January 1,2000. (10 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions or
deny Ordinance No. 36, series of 1999, on first reading.
BAGKGROUND RATIONALE: The model codes that are administered by
the town should be updated on a regular basis in order to stay cunent with
changing construction technologies and the latest nationally recognized
minimum safety standards. Major new editions of the g model codes that
the town adopts are published every 3 years. The town updaled its building,
fire, mechanical and plumbing codes to the most current editions with
Ordinance 98-19, which became effective 111t99.
The National Electrical code, or NEC, is published on a slighily different
schedule. lt is proposed that the town adopt the most recent 1999 edition
of the NEC to replace our cunent adoption of the 1996 NEC. In addition, a
number of "clean up" amendments are proposed to eliminate some
inconsistencies in the cunent ordinance, which is found under Tifle 10 of the
Town Code.
srAFF RECOMMENDATIoN: The Buitding safety & Inspection services
Division Team recommends that the Town council AppRovE ordinance
No. 36, Series of 1999, on firs{ reading.
Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance
Providing for the Levy Assessment and Collection of Town Ad Valorem
Property Taxes Due for the 1999 Tax year and payable in the 1 999
Fiscal Year. (5 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCTL: Approve/Modifi/Deny
Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999 on second reading.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999
on second reading.
7.
8.
George Ruther
Tim Losa
o
Dominic Mauriello
An evening work session to present the redevelopment proposal for the Vail
Village Inn. The purpose of the meeting is to update and inform the Council
of the various aspects of the redevelopment application. (1 hr.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Engage in a diatogue with the
applicant and the staff regarding the future redevelopment of the Vail Village
lnn.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:The applicant has appeared on numerous
occasions before the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission
and the Design Review Board for work sessions and conceptual reviews to
discuss the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Village Inn, phase lV
building. The applicant is proposing a major amendment to Special
Development District #6 and a conditional use permit to allow for the
construstion of the Vail Plaza Hotel and the operation of a fractional fee
club. During the discussions, the Commission and the Board have provided
input, expressed their concerns and have recommended various
alternatives. A summary of the issues discussed to date is attached for
reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Engage in a dialogue with the staff and the
applicant to seek information and understanding of the current application
and proposal. Staff anticipates that the applicant will be before the planning
& Environmental Commission for a final recommendation on December 13
and will be before the Town Council in mid - late December for a work
session to continue discussions and to progress through the development
review process.
Proposed public process for development of a master plan/community
facilities plan for Donovan Park. (5 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF VA|L TOWN COUNCTL: Acceptance of
proposed process and schedule for development of a detailed master plan
for Donovan Park.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town has entered into a contract with
Odell Architects, Design Workshop, and Sasaki Architects to develop a
masler plan and building plans for Donovan park. This contract includes a
public process for aniving at decisions during the planning process. The
public process to begin in mid December includes: a programming work
session with stakeholders, public open houses (two) to confirm prioritized
program, public open houses (two) to provide input on potential design\site
plan alternatives, presentations on preferred alternative to the DRB, pEC,
Town Council, and public, and a series of hearings with the pEC, DRB, and
Council to approve final plans.
A detailed schedule will be presented to the Town council at the meeting.
Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.)
Adjournment - 9:40 p.m.
10.
11.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
laLL TTIES ARE ApPROI|IATE A]tD SUAJECT TO CHAI{GEI
THE NEXT vArL TowN c6ulc-rinE6ur_an woRK sEsstoNwfLL BE oN TuESDAY,12t14t99, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNcll GHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwfLL BE oN TUESDAY,12t21tg9, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL cHAMBERS.
THE NEXTVAILTOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwfLL BE oN TUESDAY,lzt21t9g, BEGINN|NG AT 7:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctl GHAMBERS.
Sisll-alguage interpretation available upon rfrues-t i'itn zZ ttour notification. please cail 47g-z332voiceor 479-2356 TDD for information.
t.
Ff[ t c0Py
Memorandum
To: Vail Town Council
From: George Ruther, Senior Special Projects Planner
Date: December 7, 1999
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel - Information Update
The purpose of this memorandum is to update the Town Council on the progress ofthe development review ofthe
Vail Plaza Hotel, to inform the Council of the issues discussed to date, to forward the preliminary recommendation
of the Design Review Board and to identify the next steps in thc development review process.
ISSUES DISCUSSED TO DATE
The Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission and thc Dcsign Revicw Board have held numerous
worksession meetings and conceptual reviews to discuss the proposed major amendment to Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village krn. The major amendment is intended to facilitate the construction of the Vail Plaza
Hotei. Over the course of the meetings and reviews the Commission, Board and staff have bad the opportunity to
cornrnent and provide feeriback to the applicant on the redevelopment proposal. Thc Commission and Board
comments are based upon review and consideration of the relevant goveming land use regulation documents. Staff,
while taking into consideration the land use regulations, has frrcused primarily on the technical aspccts of thc
proposal (i.e ., dcvclopment standards, zon.ing compl.iance/analysis, engineering standards).
The following is a summary of the comments and discussions to date:
Vail Road Setback
In general, the Commissioners disageed with staffs concem that the proposed hotel should be required to rnaintain
the required twenty-ibot setback along Vail Road or at a minimum meet the criteria rccently established for
determining setbacks for developments located in the Public Accommodation zone district. The Commissioners
believed tbat the setback rvas appropriate given the cxisting dcvclopment on adjaccnt propefiies. Several
Commissioners did express an interest, however, in reviewing a landscape plan to insue that tbe streetscape along
Vail Road crm be adequately provided and that the applicant address the setback critcria and demonstrate why a
setback oncroachment should be granted. Since the Commissioners last saw the plans and had an oppoftunity to
comment on the proposed Vail Road setback, staff has discovered a discrepancy in the survey information provided
by the applicant. The discrepancy in the survey data does not affect the proposed distance of the hotel from the
propeny line (setback), however, the proposed distance between lhe hotel and the street has decreased from earlier
submittals. The minimum distance proposed from the back of the curb is approximately 16'-6" and the maximurn
distance is approximately 26'. T\e width of the right-of-way (back of cwb to the property line) is approximately
10'-6". A reduced copy of the Vail Road Setback Study prepared by the applicant has been attached for ref'erence.
Buildins Heiqht
The staff had identified a concem with the proposed heigbt of the hotel on several portions of tho development site.
Gcnerally, staff believed that tho applicant should be required to mitigate the negative effects of the proposed hotel
height through design considerations. However, upon reviewing the plans, the Commissioners believed that the
proposed height of the hotel was acceptable. Several Commissioners did indicate that certain areas of the horel did
not respect thc cxisting developmcnt on adjacent properties and suggcsted that the applicant continue to explore
F:\everyone\council\memos\99\wi1 207 1
.l
:r, ",'i lt "t ti
solutions to the problcm. Of geatest concem was the height of the hotel in relation to the residential uses in the
Gateway Building and that the hotel tumed its back on the Gateway Building. In this particular location the relative
height of the hotel is approximately 68' tall.
Greenspace/Pedestrian Circulation
This pzrticular issue generated the most discussion, The Vail Village Inn Special Development District
contemplates an interior courtyard partially sunounded by commercial development. The courtyard is intended to
serve the guests and visitors staying within the Vail Village Inn as well as accommodate pedestrian traffic offof
East Meadow Drive. The Commissioners are most conccmed that the proposal does not provide adequate pedestrian
circulation throughout the District. The applicant has been asked to review the site plans and seck opportunities to '
improve circulation. Possible improvements suggested by the Commissioners included reducing the size of the pool
deck area, increasing the walkway widtbs near Phases I & II, introducing more retail frontage to the courtyard
creating a bctter pedestrian connection to the Gateway Building raising the furish elevation ofthc pool deck,
revising the tower design at the south entrance to the hotel and repairing the paven within the District. Since the
Commissioners last reviewed the site plans relative to pedestrian circulation the proposed site plan has been
redesigned. The purpose of the redesip is to accommodate pedestrian circulation as requested. The Town of Vail
Design Review Board has seen the redesiped plans and has passed along favorable comments to the applicant.
Buildinq Entrance on Vail Road
The Commissioners generally believed that the proposed enlrance desip on Vail Road was acceptable. Several
Commissioners did request that the applicant present additional drawings and details of the proposetl enlrimce
design at the next meeting. Depending upon the information submitted, improvements to the entrance maybe
requested. The concem with the entrance is that it may lack a sense of arrival and that vehicles could not adequately
maneuver within the desigrated area. Since the plans were last presented to the Commission thc applicant has
redesigned the area at the building's cntrance off Vail Road. Staff is cunently reviewing the plans to determine
whether the Commission's concems were addressed.
Acc ommodation Unit Reouirement
Over the years the Town has consistently requhed that accommodation units be provided in Pbase [V of the Vail
Village Inn. The rcquired number was once as high as 175 units. The existing ordinance requires no fewer than 148
accommodation units. The applicant's proposal includes 99 accommodation units and 48 part-time fractional club
units for a combined total of i 47 units. The Commissioners believed that given the types of units proposcd and the
anticipated operation ofthe fractional fee club units, that the spirit and the intent of the requirement was essentially
being met.
Parking Requirement
The applicant is proposing to provide parking spaces within the new botel. These spaces are rn addition to the 42
hotel spaces that are already provided and will remain in the parking structue beneath the Phasc III Condominium
Building. Therefore, tire total proposed parking spaces lbr the hotel is 290 parking spaces. The total number of
parking spaces proglsed for the entire Special Development District is 366. There is an existing requirernent that 75
additional spaces bc provided as part of the redevelopment ofPhase IV to meet an existing deficit within thc
District. Pursuant to the Zoning Regulations, 3 86 parking spaces are required of the hotel development. With the
exception of the 75 required spaces, there is no change in the number ofspaces provided for remainder of the
Dsiffict. Generally, thc Commission was f'avorable with the proposed parking plan. The Commission and staff did
request that the applicant frralize the program oftbe uses withh the hotel so a more accurate parking requirement
could be established. Staff anticipates discussing this mattcr in geater detail with the Commission amd the
applicant.
Development Standards Deviations
F:\everyone\cou ncil\memos\9g\wi 1 207
o The applicant is requesting to deviate from the prescribed development standards of the Public Accommodation
Zone District. According to the Zoning Regulations, in part, deviations from the prescribed standards may be
approved by the Town of Vail upon a finding by the Town Councit that the negative impacls associated with said
deviations are outweighed by the public benefit gained. L1 thecase of the Vail Plaza Hotel, the requested deviations
are, building height, setbacks;nd parking. The applicarit is proposing an additional 25'of buildingheight,upto 19-
foot encroachments in to thc required 20-foot setbacks and 20 fewer parking spaces rhan required by the Zoning
Regulations. The exact number of parking spaces has not yet been determined as a final building program has not
been provided for review. If deemed appropriate, the Council will need to make a finding to the affect that any
negative impact associated with requested deviations is outweighed by the public benefit gained.
Elnoloree Housinq
The applicant is proposing to provide emplope housing for a percentage of the "new" emplolees resulting liom the
hotel construction. Based upon an analysis completed by the applicant and providcd to the Community
Development Depanrnent, the new hotel is expected to generate 105 "new" emplolees. The "new" employees are
in addition to the 74 empkrlaes already working full-time or part-time at the Vail Village Inn. The applicant is
proposing to provide decd-rcstricted employee housing for 30o/o (32) of the "new" emplopes. Due to the
unavailability ofprivate vacant land resources within the Town limits, the applicant anticipates that all or a portion
of the dced-restrictcd housing will be provided in an out-of-town or down-valley location. In order to maximize the
benefit of the housing to the Town of Vail, the applicant has suggested that the housing will be available only to
Yall Pla:a Hotel employees. Il is further anlicipated that some form of transportation will be provided to the
emplolees from the out-of{own or down-valley location to the hotel. The Planning & Environmental Commission
has briefly discussed the employee housing altematives with the applicant and expressed that, based upon the
information providcd to date, the proposal seenu reasonable and appropriate. Staff will be discussing the matters of
employee housing with the applicant in greater detail. Staff and the Planning & Environmental Commission will be
providing a firnl recommendation to the Town Council.
Loadins & Deliverv
The loading and delivery altematives have been discussed at length tlroughout the development rcvicw process by
each of the parties involved. The Council has expressed concems regarding aesthetics, capacity/adequacy and
public safety. The Design Review Board has expressed concems that the hading and delivery f'acility rnust be
incorporated into thc dcsign of the hotcl and that il be aesthetically pleasing. The staff has reviewed the technical
aspects of the design (slope, tuming radii, access, etc.) and forward comments to the applicant. The Planning &
Environmental Commission has stated that the concept appears appropriate, howcvcr, the vchiclc
maneuvering/circulation and public safety concems must be ad&essed. The staff and the Commission have
requestcd that the report of the consulting tratfrc engineers be arnended to include analysis and recommendations on
the circulation and public safety concerns. As greater information is provided and design altematives are generated,
further discussions will occur
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION
On Wednesday, December 1, 1999, the Town of Vail held a meeting io review and to make a preliminary
recommcndation on the Vail Plaza Hotel to the Vail Town Council. Based upon the rcview of the plans, including
numerous conceptual review discussions, the Design Review Board ofthe Town of Vail has recommend approval of
the hotel proposal. Please refer to the attached memo daled l2lll99 for details.
NEXT STEPS
The next step in the development review process is a request for a final review and recommendation from the
Planning & Environmental Commission to the Vail Town Council. The fu:ral review and recommendation is
schedulcd for Monday, Deccmber 13. Thc applicant is thcn rcquesting anothcr worksession with lhe Town Council
F:\everyone\council\memos\99\wi 1 207
on December l4th. Staff anticipates rhat provided any unforeseen delays, the Council could be reviewing and
considering an amending ordinance in early January of 2000.
o
F:\everyone\council\memos\gg\wi'l 207
o
o
o
',i ti i ,.' L
:'; [".: ,i t" .,-'
I
I
\
! .--
)i
i.
d\
6
I
E
/
i-1"1lirlr.tj
i
o
.':|
D
l.ooe(D
,t
I
--t_
I!v
l!
EI
E
\T
et
<)o 4\F'
l}
9H23
'r'i
triii'
-1.:
f
-o-lrlv
-D]N
D?
l'.ll
F}(D
-
ll\J/
Fla
zYgP6rr
":.P
.rs6=
q :-r!i
;!f.d
@
@
@
@
A
s
lt<B=ot,r[cI
!tGIo
-&l\.@.
qnv
FEYF
N
I'Y
3
Llz
E iE>A$C)
H eE5Q(/)
E+" O:,BE'
o='s7
a!
el ci
h'6:iJoPrfog)F+r H(D
.&.ffiED6E;'w
F
z
oo
L-lz
t5
dri f< rr: o.
" ''i.3
^.o
^v)a)yU'?r.(n
o .o)5Eoa(DEIoO.5t-0*qHdxo
i'D =B.?
^4./846
EK
\EZol=l
L*]
3
z
Pt-
V)
F.l>
(D {<l<=og
0A^
v)o
F)
o
E
(A
!-}
','l
(D
(D
i*.l
H
L^JF
talzFj
l+t
5/-
ir(!3ut
Fat
oE
JARH6-a9(9 Fl!z 6'5
o
outU'
(D
N
Ft
o
(D(t)
(a
,iN
triiii
@htv
N
LltlH>
s?
-.
-Fg
-D9N
F]
Hf{off
tD
-
2.49 !o-
a-?er
B5
roi35
(A
tD
oq
tD
tD(n
.:/':.
'...
@
II.Y
F
N
.a\tgaFilH:ffi
..lt-
z0
rl
z
U)
ofrl
@
{O
< u)
oFi(DcL
F(D(n)
o=
qut
or_lo
(D
cJ
(}
(a
(D
I
@
-'v
a4
!.rPt-
5'>
OQ
Pi;0cts
0a-
rn lltt 6'Bts(}(Do=i
(A
U)
oq
o
(D
ah
H'Y
0
'-]
z
zz
Ello
H
za
J4Q'dv(JF)B=3.
F 8oi
oE-a6
(D:ig;ox.(D t-:
o<'{.o
R"&sai. Flca ='
oc
::N
;ii:3mZe:!-"
ifiiir;':! i: i';62
>ta>:/A:F
xa-
A) r,o F,|
<E'
<!'ooagR"
6vtHO
Fto
g?
0ax(D='
-.=sq
i6 JD
A)c)
O. F)
Zi oaDr c0,- (h9rn
D9F.
-H.Y
-Aq?N
D9
Hf{
4-Y
F+'
tD
-
7<YDd=
aarE5
N=
6P60
a
(D
oe
tD
(Drtt
o
a
o
Alra
-.
-
-'v
-i.lFNAq
-#
-Y
(D
F
ll
3'g
7-
=.i
c;
?z
+='ja
=a
z4
"iO
ci
=^
rtr$
D9
-.
-t'll
-lqtat
N
A?
tsl-.
vF}
tD
-
z{9p-d=
;Acb'
N=
.aX
aaot"
=ri r!Fln
a1
-:<
!:JF'
F9
-a
-HYFA.!;Nfi'r-a
F"r
-Y
Gt?
-
z4i!n
-t r^I^'
|i
I rt
U-N
g"
fE:e,gN
EgJo
=ofr
@
tlN
is=
rl"ffilaz
\v/*nFO_io
aE
E,
=
,l
II
ri
iitl
€€
'(
6)\
iiffiH
iiigr VV
g,
ieE
iiR
iBF'-=
g
@
\v/
^sb:<,ro
4tg7
x
tiNl0 _
lrrl3ar!'Fllaz
g
f=:F9HNleeo
=o
@
rf\v/
f(DF<;fD
€=
fD
,8
lr
t;
r!
itit
h,
(t
!l\: /ixi*
z4\,ri.ll
ii!uH
i!iIE
<
%
F;E+: Fe;igN:iFegd_Tod
@
\v/
F-s@F<;@-En=e
=
wI
It
art!rl,rt
IItl
z
t!9
r
-o
\1,
lzN
isxteml2-,f1 z-
g
sE
:F9gN
IprT
o
o
\v/
Fg' (D*<1(D
H+6eF
=oo
V@
-rEl@ITE|:rtcrDE[E[mr.rtF.-t'ir -rrr!f,rn IrrT.Errr Irrre'rn ImHr_ErmIECE
I i:mtrffr-Erlrm
Ffro-a
KE
ffi*c
Nl!'.,/\r/liffi H
ilig:
%
{eEtfsrleN;EFJEb--T
oefr
\v/
rF
E-;E-
eg
o
Eu @
ftil
trE
p*H
Hli
h.g
Els
t---TE
r_Em
|----m
7)
d_
I
\
)
tlN
is=iemlez
g,
feEl-^ Pr;+N;E F9FE---r.+g
@
\v/
F?aFi <;o
eo
o
il
[;
rg
r!lt
!B
oO ooooo O
O O QOOo6 .^r .nE\,..1v \., v E\-, \,, rJ
O O 6()0ooo oooooo
&.ws#
I'
o ooQoo opo o o
ooo0ooobooo
oooopooqo ooooooooioo
OOOOOOOTOOooooboodo o
ooooloooQo
's
)
()
I
i ---
.lt\i!
;iii;
g
FeE*fe,i gN
; IFDBo-Io
@
^\v/
F
FPFa-Ex=o
o-
I
;
L--
r'
I
2\
(
?
)f
)
iHN
ils=tJ;z
g,
E
E,N
F,
=ofr
@
\v/
-o
a_
==e,1/'
o
=(D
!,
(,)
6-
!,
CLoraroro
o
tl
o
0_
7tt
E
rl !| :ll i IIl: ll!le lrlrltil 813
z;
1'.'(l{T-{T-rt-ii I'
ilHiililiil
!i!;H
iIi'E
P"
:=; E+: e,lgN:T F'F6--=
o
@
\v/Fo
o
4
==TA+
€o
T-------*--
L__
ttt!llt!--.ll lli fl
----i'i
(\
)\(\\\\\a\
(
i
I
IJ
I
;L__.1
t
?
(
)(
)(
o
o
T
rI r I I I r'
x
I!i
Ifl---r-
I
I
I
I
F
i
;
;
a
--1--t! | f f r .. t rI r l f .. I f tf r |! f t;ll a | : | ; ll ! I : I i ll 3 | i | 3ll8 | t I It li
-t ,' -i I ir ll i! f t li 0 s f i I i ll jtl * l:: ll! fs I ilf; f i f !i \ t, i__;jr'il
- -t.t.tTr5ll | | i I ill f I[ | | It Bl
rIiili f: ti tff t: f; tf f tr trtf l I r tr tf r tr t:rE[' t't- ' t-t- ||- t' t'U* l-t- lt- t^ t-
_t-l Lf
a ;lil
.-l'-'l
l:lls ls lJ llr til;ll:. l: lslls l:lr lls l: lst;llE ls le lls la l6ll r la l8lll l* |: llE l: lnLTltf {<r r<t<t<t.[.t.t <s<t<t.H< t. | <B< t.t<:iJL'.i L'lL-l:HL'lf JL"Ltlr_'rl ,lt'lj lj
* lr lll lt li ilu a* I r llB lr t g ll: lE t! lli =ll!l3i*
< t<tt<t<l< < t< t<U< t<t<||< f <t<tt<i l: il:li l; ili l; l:ll: l:15 0r
I__)
z
f
m
q)
=.
f
m
0)
lT|
o
OJ--
+
qll
1
++++
iE iE iE ;T
{ rl .l1 d1111tttl
oa5
m
(D
g)
=.
v,
m
o
0)
=-
iffiH
El|;7Erlffi
zE1z
P"
E.
F9N
F9
=o
o
/f\v/
@
=g
rEFgq
E>em
fD
ED
6'
=(
Et
I
€s9=Fo;e-.'ll9
s+
+
r[s
1
i
fifi4Z
1'1
tlIiiFH
z
o3ot
Erni<o
iEo
sfErn5(D
Er<
o
g.
re
F'N
E,
=o6
m.A'L)9imfo
!J A)
rJ-o
at,oosotE-.?o
o,t <
a-8.o
IJ*5
++
I
J
IL;l?
JJ$*.F -t++
@g.
a
5'gq
(aoR
6'
=ta
o
tl
x
I
Iil
?t
tlIJ
**+s
J+*rF
z
m
F'
t'r't
F)IA
rn
o
$
=.t
o
m
o
!)d.
Vt
m
o
A,
t3ry
!rT,raiPm
EFz
g"
E
F,N
F'
=oR
@
\v,,Ee
g
=@
@
m
o
E9
5'
=v,
6s9=Fo|,=-r' q
r!,
E+
it.;
tl
5
rtt!
riI
iI
ta
I
J
T
F+
ttl
eea?iil+++
iiffiH
i\iifr
z
o3
E rttfs
d_8.o5
€
8E
$m-9|De6
o
ttl
JJJl:lrl&**!BF
I
J,l
f,IFc
J
*?<l
(/,
/ Co:rE-€6-oi<
atso
P=p
P)N
P)
=ofr
@
\V/,E
=.a
="@
@
(n
fDR
=.o
=tn
6rr--So:olr, O
rEr
€+
I
+<
<t
3
5
qqovo
0)
m
o
e.
t
@
tl
zo-
-1
gJ
@ov
!,
rn
(D
q)
!f.
N
%
p.
F,N
FD
=o
@
vr
=oo
(noo
6'
=(a
',Nl-+
:B;Eia
l'- ffil7z
6srt =:3-Fo
t\l =-i" g
r l!,Es
E
n
.'
ar
Ei,
E!
fgll
atoc
\t
q)
N!,
m
o
!)
6'2
m9'lt
3qt
N!,
m
o
qr
6'
|iiFH
g".
E
EN
FJ
Jo
@
/f\vt
E
E'N
ED(f,
fDR
6'
=tn
6slF{nr., =lro
E&
n-
ll
$
I@I
I
,l
I
)
lzN
li=
,g;
iJ'm
EFz
%
5sEi ..= gg
ii+N;iFD6iiII
@
\v/
E
=.a
.-=r 5'
FEE -=
;aa =E9'*d 9.Egtcna
)a =E
E9
=
t;l!I!cl
i!IE
,// /
ir,A
cl
I@
>)t.
I
I
i;ffiH
tlrsE
g*
FEE+: Feii {N
;+F,-T
g
@
/f\vlE
=.=E--=
il€=@
-:Qd Ilni o-
Ee: @;O 5{F+o--g
F'
=NJ
,// /
/i /1
+
$
IT
']
tttt
TTTT
NT{--v/-
. (t)'o:o
NT
tltl
,u,:o!o
at
!E
.a
ttt\
U)
()
oo
+
iF
I
I
it3 \ :F
iig*NFilaz H
:-
,u)
.(!;o
P'
]0
F'N
FJ
Jo
@
It
E
6sgFff'
I\J=-|,,9J!|
Ee
liig*.
A'.
9)o-
(
%
fcE
1-^ Pll*N:iF
Ig
o
tnocl+
-"t
a
tt,
.+hia\ oaf.l o
A)=t a\OUOo-
t'FF|;=u-d
.*Y
@
=a
ot
f1llltlrtl,Irf
a-Tm ,,'
// //o'.//o?."
n"bS(l:"o o
t..:agjJt3;
tt
GI
6
E
a
c
4
o
.-]
v7o
ts
o
r 8-|'E iJ"E'TrelEl"olF l^\f J,v/
t
$iiii
19'
H
D9N!l
H
F}(D
5fchqii
tsa
=D6e
o
o
o
M
Ir3
vttEroo
ti,
iii;H
iEiET -Pgq
5g
3
e,6!:{\
:Itr:
-t f
(D
v)o
0-.oo
"Fi5dOJs{
3'
o
.J'o
g.
oo
e
6!
BFrEig
q'
-0!:r Ictr!e!
ErthJ v,E
=.
qg_
TIg
mllc
=oX
P.
-tr
p,
N
9,
=o
o
tsg=I i)
NI:lro
rtr
Es
.,F
3!!ais.N
9:5!t
(t)
3
3o
v,o
tt,
=.oo
0
ah;9:t:f
.N
3
et
B;!iii8'3 cro
t\,
6l
--o;N
6rt
@E
=@
ea
I
-
'i I
.Dec. 2. 1999 4:29P1[ ZE[a[]l AlrlD ASS0CIA No. 1560 P. 2/2
rom:10?",{'
)
T
T
_lr
att
ts
lD
u7on
6-
(t9>D<-E
-!,-l.lOoooSo;94rr!i 0tJN-r
dql
ta
atr
.D
|D
Ur
.Do
6'
E
-{t
o-9>
5o<rr- d
TS
Etrr;giuJH
;r
|D$
IA
d
attoo
6'fo
til;H
iliil
E9
F;E
iE$EOT
o6
{}
?a
EF!rnx-(n
;lee-
q
e
I
CI{
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
mx 970-479-2452
MEMORANDUM
To: Town of Vail Desip Review Board
From: Community Development Departrnent
Date: December l, 1999
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel - Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council
In anticipation of appearing before the Vail Town Council for first reading ofan amending ordinance to allow for
the redevelopment of Phase IV of the Vail Village Inn Special Deveiopment District, the applicant has requested a
preliminary recommendation from the Desip Review Board.
Pursuant to the Town Code, in paxt, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate limits
of the Town unless design approval has been granted in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code."
Should the Design Review Board choose to make a prcliminary recommendation of approval to the Vail Town
Council on the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, staff would suggest that the following finding and
conditions be made part of the recommendation:
"Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board
finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structues, the hotel's sunoundings and with Vail's
environmcnt. The Board further finds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the
Design Guidetines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter I I of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plnn & Urban
Dcsign Considerations. Therefore, the Board recommends approval of the redevclopmcnt proposal for the Vail
Plaza Hotel. The Board's rccommendation of approval caries with it the following conditions:
l. That the applicant submits a flrral landscape plan, final off-site improvements plan, and outdoor tighting
plan in accordance with the provisions prescribcd in the Zoning Regulations for review and approval of the
Design Review Board.
2. That the appiicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and
approval ofthe Design Review Board.
Thal the applicant submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanisal plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-
top mechanical equipment shall be enclosed and scrccned from public view.
3.
^
tP *""'"'"o 'n"*
Ea.sr VIr,r,^q.cn HomEowNEns AssocIATIoN, INC.
The South Frontage Road and Vail Road are critical vehicular links to Vail Village and its surrounding residentialneighborhoods, C.urr-ently on Vail Road" during periods of high traffic, vehicles turning in"to p.ivaiJO.iu.*uv, "-gulcKly cause the back .!:F ot north and southbound traffic. This circumstance causes particular concern for
-the
:olsequer-t9es.affecting the main Vail roundatoul. Approving minimum building setbdcks Ao"g Vali noid-ri-our, *v
a|$rre optlon to make lmprovements to orovide for an efficient and safe traffic flow as rvell as fir an aestheticallyl*:*-*:'fi :T#r';iHJ.?'[!li.;,"*n#rusitr.rutr$:n,,:r;i;si*n*iil#".,*"
Rod near the east exit of the Main Vail-roundaboug createl the pot5ntiii foi att-o*r.""rr*y t "dh--d_
Ollicers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm
Directors JudithBerkowitz - DolphBridgewater - EllieCaulkins Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
To: Town of Vail - Town Council
From: Jim Lamont, Executive DirectorDate: December 7.1999RE: Vail Plaza Hotel Special Development District Amendment proposal
The Association's primary concems with ttre proposal fall within t'wo general categories.
o Impact upon t4e public traffic circulation and Vail Village loading & deliverv svstems.o Compliance withprior conditio.ns of.appr-oval, Vail Villige Maste-r Plan, underlying zone district
requrrements, and the relationship with adjacent properties and improvemants
1ne fo!.lowrp is recommended to provide sufficient information to make an informed recommendation to the Town
^c_";T:ll1$_t:1!:T1"9:::,p,1-+l.concerns..Thcse recommendations wiii have co"r.qo*iiJoirriu""t , p"d."n.iu"ano vehrcular clrculauon, bulldmg herghts, offsite impacts and related matters.
The growth in the visitor
Vail Village and Lionshead wil] req91t in a grgater demand upon the
gro$iln rn rne vrsrtor populatron due to lncreases rn, (recently approved or under consideration) densities forVail Village and Lionshead wil] reylt in a. qrggter demand upon the loaaing ind deii".t t;il fo;-GirV[[". rr,"
T:g?g,t?,ttlg9jtg:t-"lt loading and.-delivery system ale adverse to fie economii'-a;il;til*t"l'*Tueing orvatl- vlllage and rts surrounding residential neighborhoods. The mitigation of the cumulative effects from redevelonirenrVail.Vlla^ge and its surrounding residintial,neighbbr6ogds.-!-hgguugatron of thi ;umulative etrects fr;m reae""fopi.tent
f:**g_*n.ry1.9.-..1-ttre vrlitgl.pop;rtatron from the Vailllaza-Hotel and other r-titrr p;;i,;rti;;;;;;ip"iA --'
tlrough regulatory provisions providing for the mitigation of offsite impacG ;6tdt";did ffd a;ii".ry $;"..
The lack ofthe interconnection of interior circulation routes between earlier phases ofthe Special DevelopmentDistrict.and, llre proposed Vail Plaza Hotel places an inappropriate and unnecessary turden upon trJtfr" .ir*iution ooadJacent publlc _nght-of--ways. _Further, the configuration caules ttre unsuitable mixing of Bnis of vehicles. reducine theemqency and sate operaton of glt-:{e loadrng.an$ delivery facilities. The interconne-ction-df these routes and poin6 of
1:9:: yf anticipated and prwided for.in the. design and ionstruction of the earlier phases. No agreemeots restrain orpreempt me I own from requlnng these intercormections.
The compliance criteri4-such as the view corridor defined in the initial Special Development District establishedlor the srte, were tmposed upon the former orvners and adjacent property owners. The rational'ana criterii apptieC tor *re
Post Office Bor 238
Telephone: (970) 827-5680
Vail, Colorado 81658
Message/FAX: (970) 827-5856
ll,aTllt t ra:45!lr r
setting aside of the compliance criteria is a matter of frir, consistcnt, and equal tr,catnrent for former owners. adiaccot
PtroPcrtJt ownen and all property ownets in similar circumstances. Compliance critcria irrclude documeag and
-decisions
with rcspcct !o varios pluses ofthe Special Development District the Vail Village Mastcr Plan the uaderlvinc zmc
dishict and collatcral rcquircmcnts placcd on adaccnt popcrtics. Thc documcntation of chmmi and amcnimirts to thc
Special Developnrent District has been reported. However, lhe deviation or negation of compiiancc criteria has not beenjustificd as !o warranted changes in conditions, rcsulting effects, and the public prqposc scruil.
The Association has given testimony to the Planning and Ernrironrne'ntal Conmission rccardine the forcsoins matt€rs
within thc cmtcrrt ofthc wotft scssiins thcy havc conductcd wilh rgpcct to this itcm. Al thc a-rfhoriw t6 initiatc actiwithin thc cnntcxt of-thc wotft scssiirns thcy luvc coirductcd wilh r€spcct to this itcm. ei tnc a-rrlor;W ti inifiit" iction
on serreral of thcsc matters falls oulside thi jurisdictior of the Comnrission c stafr, they arc preseirrcd-to Council so as ton serreral ofthcsc matten falls oulside thi jurisdictior of the Comnrission orstafi, they are p'resen
rcspect its need !o give timely consideration to the concems rlised by the Associadior - It is ftxpecft[y susgested lhat
bccausc the;rc are a sufficicnt nurnber of new Town Cormcil mcrnbcri, ccrtain rrryorts by consuliants and stiff wiO rcspcctbccausc 0re;rc are a sufficicni nurnber of new Town Cormcil mcnrbcri ccrtain reoorts by consuliants anf, sdff wiO
to this propooal should be prcsented and considered ag a qualifier to irnalizins tfie Coricil's advisorv connrents. '
formcr Council, due to thC pording cxpiration of thoir tcrins, demurred on mikins advisory conrmeiris" sccilrins to
insteadro forward the responsibilifu to the newly elected Council. The Association is Fepared to girrc additiSnal
r@orul Dy cotrsutants and statt with rrsl
;tfie Coricil's adviso'ry coments. Thi
so as to
advisory conrmeiris" scanhg to choose
npporting trestirnony witli respect to these matters.
torT 'WbOFVAIL
Department of Community Developme nt
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452
December i6, 1999
Jay Peterson
Bailey & Peterson, P.C.
108 South Frontage Road, Suite 204
Vail, Colorado 81657
Sentvia fax: 476-0099
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel
Dear Jay,
Thank you for meeting with me yesterday to prepare for the December 2l$ Vail Town Council meeting.
Following our meeting I reviewed my notes. In reviewing my notes I believe I may have written down some
questions that we did not discuss yesterday. The reason for sending you this letter is to provide you with a written
list of the additional questions we necd to respond to on December 21" with the Town Council.
o How will the ownership structure ofthe fractional fcc club be developed and what control wiil individual club
members have in financially participating in capital improvements? Who determines capital improvement
needs and how do they get completed?o If a left+urn lanc were rcquired in the future, what impacls would there be on the proposed landscaping? Is
there in fact enough room for a left-tum lane? Please provide options and altemativcs illustrating the impacts.r Please have the trafiic consultant discuss the potential impacts of the shared vehicular access to Pbase III and
the loading/delivery dock.o What are the sutVshade impacts of the proposed hotel on the South Frontage Road and how are any negative
impacts being midgated?r How will recycling be handled in the loading/delivery area?. The final bus stop proposal should prcservc thc cxisting trces along East Meadow Drive.r What are the impacts of traffic on Vail Road?. Is the left-turn onto the South Frontage Road from the loading/delivery area safe? Please have thc traffic
consultant respond to this matter.. How were the traffic projections used in the Trafric Impact A:ralysis determined and how was that information
used in the report? Why rvas traffic only projected out 15 years?o Where will the handicap spaces be provided in the parking structure? How many spaces will you provide?o What is ttre justification for firther encroaching into the view of Vail Mountain from the roundabout?o What are the implications of creating an interior connection of the parking sEucture to the existing structure
undemeath Pbase III?
{g run"urror",
, Yqilil I jil
i /.L.-
Upon receiving my letter please grve me a call o-r ltontV the ofiice. I would like to briefly discuss these questims al^with you. You can reach me by telephone at 479-2145,
Sincerely,
I
fJt^q-R'-ter,,
Georgp Ruther,AICP
Senior Special Projects Planner
TownofVail
o