HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5D LOT M O VAIL PLAZA HOTEL VARIOUS LEGAL DOCUMENTS BACKGROUND INFORMATION PART 2 LEGALVAIL PI.AZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INCREMENTAL REVENUE IMPACTS
RECURRING AT PROJECT COMPLETION
IINAL DRAFT DATED 9-9-98
U
PROPEFTY TAXES
4% SALES TAXES
4% SKI LIFT TAXES
1% REAL ESTATE TAXES
BUSINESS UCENSES
GOUNTY SALES TAXES
CIGARETTE T$(ES
ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND
SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES
FRANCHISE FEES
TOTAL INGREMENTAL REVS - VAIL PLAZA HOTEL
B-2
$64,928
1 ,163,213
46,679
11,760
11,632
43,620
388
15,026
3,246
4,202
$1.404.696
RECURRING AT PROJECT
VAIL PLAZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INCREMENTAL REVENUE IMPACTS
FINAL DRAFT DATED 9-9-98
General Assumptions:
Retail/ResVLounge Value - Sq. Ft.
Retail/ResVlounge Sq. Ft.
Hotel Value per Room
Hotel Rooms
Interval Sq. Ft,
Interual Units
Condominium Sq. Ft.
Condominium Units
Condo/nterval Value per Sq. Ft
1. RetaiURestauranVlounqe Space - Vail Plaza Hotel
Actual Value Retail, Restaurtanl, Lounge
Assessed Valus @ 29%
Tourn Mill Lwy
Town Prcperty Taxes
Town S.O. Taxes @ 5olo
2. Vail Plaza Hotel (lncludinq Conf, Ctr. & Amenities)
Actual Value Vail Plaza Hotel
Assessed Value @ 29%
Town Mill Levy
Town Property Taxes
Tovrn S.O. Ta,res @ 5%
3. Fractional (lnterval) Club Units - Vail plaza Hotel
Actual Value Fractional Club Units
Assessed Value @ 9.74%
Town Mill Lwy
Town Property Ta<ee
Town S.O. Taxes @ S%
B-3
(Continued On Next Page)
$27s
21,145
$1s0,000
276
1,900
15
5,S2
1
$1,000
$5,814,875
$1,686,314
4.91
97,2s7
$364
$41,400,000
$12,006,000
4.ffi1
$51,87E
s2,594
$28,500,000
$2,275,90O
4.32'l
$11,9!,s
$600
VAIL PLAZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INCREMENTAL REVENUE II'PACTS
FINAL DRAFT DATED 9_9_98
4. Condominium Unit - Vail Plaza Hotel
Actral Value Condominium Unit
Assessed Value @ 9.74%
Town Mlll Levy
Torn Property Taxes
Town S,O. Taxes @ 5%
5. Total Assessed Valuation - Vail Plaza Hotel project
Assessed Value Retail Restaurant, Lounge
Assessed Value Hotel and Arnenities
Assessed Value Fractional Club Units
Assessed Value Condominium Unit
Total Assessed Value - Vail Plaza Hotel Project
Town Mill Levy
Town Propefi Taxes
Tor,m S.O. Taxes @ 5%
7, Net Incremental Assessed Valuation & Propertv Tax Revenues
Tolal lncremental Assessed Value - Vail plaza Hobl p
Town Mill Lwy
Town Property Taxes
Town S.O. Taxes @ 5%
8. Countv Road and Bridoe Fund Revenues @ 1 Mill
9, Constuction Permits @ .0075 x $At,s00.0OO
$5,5,[2,00O
$539,791
4.321
$2,932
$117
$'1,686,314
$12,006,0fl)
$2,775,900
$s39.79'l
$17,008.00s
4.921
$73.492
$3.67s
6. Deduct Existinq Assessed Valuation - Properties to be Reolaced:
Assessed Value - Buildings 3 & 4
Assessed Value - Building 5
Assessed Value - Dwelling Unit # 4@
Total Agsessed Value - Bldgs. 3 - 5 and Unit #400
Torn Mlll Levy
Torvn Property Taxes
Town S.O. Taxes @ 5%
$&t9,178
$832,625
$sno.000
$1.981.60s
4.321
$8.563
$428
$15.026.202
4.921
864.928
$3.246
$1s.026
$48t,.750
B-4
VAIL PI-AZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INCREMENTAL REVENUE IMPACTS
FINAL DRAFT DATED 9_9-98
General Assumptions:
Hotel Booms:
Number of Rooms Available for Rent
Average Daily Rental Rate per Foom
Average Annual Occupanry Rate per Room
Average Persong Occupying a Boom
Increm€ntal Percons Generated Annually
Average Taxable Daily Ependiture
per Person (Excluding Lodging)
Fractional Club (Renbl Portion - 24 weeks/year):
Number of Fractional Units Available for Rent
Average Daily Rental Fate per Unit
Average Occupancy Rate per Unit
Average Persons Occupying a Unit
lncremental Pergons Generated Annually
Average Taxable Daily Expenditure
per Person (Excluding Lodging)
Incremental Petsons Generated Annuallv
Average Taxable Daily Expenditure
per Person (Excluding Lodging)
1, Sales Taxes Generated from Hotel Operations
Taxable Salee - Annual - Lodging
4% Sales Tax - Annual - Lodging
Taxable Sales - Annual - Retail/Rest
4% Sales Tax - Retail/Restaurant
Taxable Sales - Annual - All Sources
4% Sales Tax - All Sources
(Continued On Next Page)
276
$1eo
80%
1.75
141,036
$100
15
$s0o
80%
6
12,096
$100
Fractional Club (lnterval Ornership Porilon - 28 weeks/year):
Number of Fractional Units Available for Occupancy 15
Average Dally Rental Rate per Unit O
Average Occupancy Fate per Unit gV"
Average Persons Occupying a Unit 6
15,876
$100
$15,312,,,t80
$612,499
$14,109,600
$564'1,14
$29,416,080
$1,176,e+3
B-5
VAIL PI.AZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INCREMENTAL REVENUE IMPACTS
FINAL DRAFT DATED 9-9-96
2. Sales Taxes Generated from Rental Portion of Fractional Club
Tacable Sales - Annual - Lodging
4% Salss Tax - Annual - Lodging
Taxable Salee - Annual - Retail/Rest
4% Sales Ta,r - Retail/Restaurant
Ta,rable Sales - Annual - All Sources
4% Sales Tax - All Sources
3. Sales Taxes Generated l?om lnterval Portion of Fractional Club
Taxable Sales - Annual - Lodging
4% Sales Tax - Annual - Lodging
Taxable Sales - Annual - Retail/Fest
4% Sales Tax - RetaiVRestaurant
To<able Sales - Annual - All Sources
4% Sales Tax - All Sources
4. Sales Taxes Generated from All Sources:
Ta.xable Sales - Annual - Lodging
4% Sales Tax - Annual - Lodging
Taxable Sales - Annual - Retail/Rest
4% Sales Tax - Retail/Restaurant
Taxable Sales - Annual - All Sources
4% Sales Tal( - All Sources
To<able Sales - Annual - Lodging - 78 Rooms
4% Sales Tax - Annual - Lodging - 7g Rooms
fuinud Persons Generated from 7E Rooms
@ 51Y" Occupancy
Taxable Sales - Annual - Retail/fiestaurant
4% Sales Tax - Annual - Retail/Bestaurant
Taxable Sales - Annual - All Sources
4% Sales Taxes - Annual - All Sources
6. Net lncremental Taxable Salee & 4% Salee Tax Re\renues
Taxable Sales - Annual - Lodging
4% Sales Tax - Annual - Lodging
Taxable Sales - Annual - Retail/Restauranr
4% Sales Ta< - Annual - REtaiUREstaurant
Taxable Salee - Annual - All Sources
4% Sales Taxes - Annual - All Sources
7. County Tax Rebate @ .0375
8. Ciqarette Taxes @ ,0089
9. Franchise Fees @.0038
@
$1,008,000
$40,320
$1,209,600
$48,384
$2,217,600
$88,704
$o
$0
$1,587,600
$63,504
$1,587,600
$63,504
$16,320,480
$6s2,819
$16,900,800
$6"/6,032
$33.221_2!!0
91-g29€5r
$1,600,000
$e[,000
25,409
$4,540,948
$101,638
$4140€19
$16s,638
$14,720,480
$588,819
$14,9s9,Es3
$574,394
$29.080.333
$1.163,213
$!|{! 624
$388
$44.202
$11.632
B-6
VAIL PLAZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INGREMENTAL REVENUE IMPACTS
FINAL DRAFT DATED 9_9_98
General Assumptions:
Annual Skier Days/FFU
Annual Skier Days/Hotel Room
Efiective Rws/Skier Day
'1. Ski Lift Taxes Generated trom Hotel Rooms
Number of Hotel Rooms
Skier Days
Taxable Lift Fevenues
4% Ski Lift Taxes - Hotel Rooms
2. Ski Lift Taxes Generated from Fractional Units
Number of Fractional Units
Skier Days
Taxable Lit Revenues
4% Ski LiftTaxes
3. Ski Lift To<es Generated from All Sources
Skier Days
Taxable Lit Revenues
4% Ski LiftTaxes
Skler Days
Taxable Lift Revenues
4% Ski Lift Taxes
5. Net Incremental Skier Davs & 4o6 Ski Lifi Tax Revenues ,
Skier Days
Taxable Uft Revenues
4% Ski Lift Taxes
B-7
4. Deduct: E<btino Skl Lift Taxes Generated from properties to be Replaced:
Number of Hotel Rooms Zg
253
'138
$37.s0
276
38,088
$1,428,sCK)
$s7,132
15
3,795
$142,313
$s,693
41,EE3
$1.s70.613
$e2.s2s
10,764
$403.6s0
$16.146
31,1'19
$1J60€0s
$46.679
VAIL PI.AZA HOTEL
TOWN OF VAIL INCREMENTAL REVENUE IMPACTS
FINAL DRAFT DATED 9_9-98
I% REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TN( REVENUES
General Assumptions:
Interval Weeks ior Sale per Unit ZA
Number of Units ls
Number of Interval Weeks forSales 4ZO
Ave. Price per lnterval Week $7O,OOOSecondary Sales Rate 4,OO7o
1. Sale of Fractional Fee lnterval Weeks
Taxable lnitial Sales $29,,t00,000
1% RETT Taxes - Inidal Sales $294.000l%RETTTaxes - secondary =@
B-8
Vail Plaza Hotel
96r070.00
Levd 8
Level 8
Gross Square Fmtngc 2,0i0i:l.N
Dwellinp Unit Arca Deck Area Kevs Bedrnoms Plllows
Dwelling Unit (upper level) 1,516.00 70.00 0.00 1.00 200
Other Areas
Mechanio.l (Rooftop) 306.00
Totrls
Dwclling Unit Net I ,5 I 5.00
Other Net 306.00
TolalN€t 1.822.m
Neucr6Dltr€rcnce 185,00 9l%
Zehrcn and Associates. Inc.
wl99
ORIGINAL
Page I
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
I-evel7
Level 7
Grcs Square Fooiagc 9,f6f.00
Dwelline Unit Area D€ck Area Kevs Bedrooms Pillows
Dwelling Unit (lower levcl) 4126.00 /104.00 2.00 4.00 12.00
Club Units
Unit Number Arca Deck Area Kevs Bedroorns Pillows
Cl$ Unir l(upper hvcl) 59200 146.m l.m 0.00 Z.W
Club Unit 2 (upper lcvel) 432.W 88.00 1.00 0.00 2.m
Cl$ Unir 3 (uppcr lcvcl) 43200 88.00 1.00 0.00 Z.@
Club Unit 4 (uopEr lcrell 59200 f46.00 1.00 A,!0 2.m
Sub-Totai Chb Unlts 2,q&00 46&00 4.0O 0,00 &m
Other Arcas
Coridor (public) l,l la00
Con (alcv$cchanical,shaft) 150.00
Con (stair) 137.00
Mechanisal (rooftoo) T13.86
SubTolal Ar€a z.nLW
Totels
Dwclling Unit Net 4 I 26.00
Club Unit l.lct 204E.00
Othcr Net 282fi.
TotdNet &346E6
Ncucross DiEereme Ef4.14 9l%
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
wt99
Page 2
Vrl Flza Hotel
96r070.00
Level 6
Grnr Square Footage
Club Units
Unit Number
Club Unit | (lowcr icvel)
Club Unir 2 (lbwer level)
Club Unit 3 (lower level)
Club Unit 4 (lower level)
Sub-Total (lower level)
Club Uni( 5 (uppcr lcwl)
Oub Unit 6 (upper level)
qub Unit 7 (upper level)
Club Unit 8 (upper lcvel)
Club lJnit 9 (uppi;; lerel)
Club Unit l0
Sub-Total (upper Leyel)
Accomodation Units
Unit Tyne
Acc. Unit A
Acc- Unit B
Acc. Unit C
Acc. Unit D (suirc-corner)
Acc- U tE (suite- ccnter)
Sub-Total Acc. Unlts
Corridor (public)
Core (elev,mechanical,sbaft)
Maid
Core (stair)
Mechatical (roofiqp)
Sub-Total Arca
Club Unit Ner
Accomnodatiotr Net
Other Net
Total Nei
Net/Gross Difierrnee
Deck Area Kerrs
2.00
2.00
2.00
3.!9
9.00
t.m
t.m
1.00
1.00
1.00
?nn
8,00
Total Area
324;15
r,984.50
0.00
736.94
614.m
3,660.r9
Level 6 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
'/j/99
r9J47.0O
Area
I,395.00
I,214.00
1,477.00
1.792.00
5"878.00
550.00
5t9.00
445.00
519.00
569.00
r.807.00
4,409.00
Unit Area
324_'15
330.75
357.75
368_47
307.00
2,510.00
4?8,00
t97.00
2t4.OO
263.00
3,662.00
10,287.00
3,660.19
3.662.00
17,@9.r9
r537.Er
Bedrooms Pillows
3.00 6.00
3.00 6.00
4.00 8.00
4.00 10.00
14.00 3r.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
528.00
Keys
1.00
6.00
0.00
2.00
2.00
11.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
Decks
1.00
Lffi
2.00
z.m
2-OO
LN
8.00
18.00
Deck Area Total Deck
55.00 55.00
z.@
3.00
s3.00 106.00
10&m 16r,00
Page 3
Vail Plaza Horel
96r070.00
Level 5
Level 5 Zehren and Associates, lnc.
ll7t99
Gross Squaft Footage 32,672.W
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Pillows
Club Unit 5 (lower level) 1,388.00 2.$ 3.00 6.00
Club Lhit 6 (lowcr level) 1,533.00 2.m 4.00 8.m
Club Unit 7 (lowff level) 831.00 0.00 zN 4.00
Club Unit 8 (lower level) 1,546.00 2.00 4.00 8.00
Club Uni!9_09rrqr_lcvcl) 1.169.00 a@ 3.00 604
Sub-Total Qower Level) 6,4fl.N t.00 16.00 32.00
Club Unit I l(uppcr level)' 526.00 88.00 t.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 12 (upper levcl) 431.00 88.00 1.00 0.00 2_00
Club Unit 13 (upper level) 43i.00 88.00 1,00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 14 (upper level) 5?6.00 88.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 15 (upper levelt 2.309.00 109.04 5.00 4.00 10.00
Sub.Total (upper leval) 4,223.00 461.00 9.00 4.00 16.00
Accomodation Units
Unit Tvoe Unit Area Keys Total Area Dccls Deck Area Total Deck
Acc. Unit A 324:t5 3.0O 974.25
Acc. Unit B 330;15 t9.00 6,284.25
Acc. Unit C 35'1J5 2.0O 715.50
Acc. Unit D (suite-comer) 368.47 4.0O t,473.88 2.00 34.00 68.00
Acc. Unit E (suite- ceater) 30?-00 4.00 t,228.00 2.00 4O.@ 80.00
Acc. Unit F (curve roofl 432.00 2.00 864.m
Sub-Total Acc. Units 33911 34.00 rr539.EE 4.0O 14t.00
Other Areas Area
Coridor (public) 4,481.00
Core (elevator, mech. shaft) 850^00
Mdd 194.00
Core (stair) 28?.00
Mcchanical (rooftop) 263.00
Sub-Total Other Areas Gt75.00
Chrb Unit Ncr 10,690.00
Acclmmodation Net I 1J39,88
Other Net 6-075.00
Toral Net 28J04-EE
NeLlGrms Diffcrence +367.12 8I7o
Page 4
V"!1 Plaza Horel
961070.00
Leve! 4 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
w/99
Level 4
Grms Square Footage 35J72.0O
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Pillows
Club Unit I l(lower level) 2,005-00 2.00 4.00 8.00
C'lub Urit 12 (lower lsvcl) 1,155.00 0.0O 3.00 6.00
Club Unit 13 (lowcr level) I,188.0O 0-00 3.00 6.00
Club Unit 14 (lower lcvel) 1.587.00 3,0S 3!00 e@
Sub-Total (lowcr level) 5935.00 5.00 13.00 26.N
Accomodation Units
Unit Tvoe Unit Area Keys Total Area De*s Drck Arca Total Dcck
Acc. Unit A 324.75 7.00 2,273.25
Acc. Unit B 330.7 5 2'f .OQ 8.930.25
,\.;c. Urit C 357.75 8,00 2,862.00
Acc. Unit D (suite-corner) 368.47 7.00 2,519.29 3.00 34.00 102.00
Acc. Unit E (suite- c€oter) 307.m 8.00 2456.00 4.m 40.00 160.00
Acc. Unitc (curve) 370.85 4.00 1,483.40
Acc. Unit H (suitc-cony'towcr) 7l'1.50 LQQ 717.50
SubTotal Acc. Unils 343JE 62.0A 2130l.69 7.00 26zN
OtherAreas Area
Corridor (public) 4,7l'1.00
Core (elevftor, mech. shaft) 1,147.14
Maid 194.00
Cor€ (stair) 287.00
Sub-Total Othcr Arcas 6345.14
Club UnitNet 5,935.00
Accomurodation Net 21,30t.69
OtherNet 6.345,14
TotalNct 33581.83
Nercrosi Difierenc€ L''m.t1 94/o
Page 5
Vail Plaza Hote!
9610?0.00
Level 3
Gross Square Fooaege 38J6f.00
Accomodation Units
Unit Tvpe Unit Area Kevs Total Area Decks D€ck Ares Toral Dcck
Acc. Unit A (wet bar) 324.'15 8-00 e598.00
.\cs. Unit B (kitchercnc) 330.75 3Z.W 10,584.00
Acc. Unir C (snire-master) 35'1.75 13.00 4,650.75
Acc. Unit D (suite-cornd) 368.47 10.00 3,684.70 4.00 34.00 136.00
Acc. Unit E (suitc- c€nter) 30?.00 12.00 3,684.00 6.00 40.00 240.00
Acc. Unit O (curve.) 370.85 4.00 1,483.40
Acc. Uoit H (suiF-cony'tower) 717.fi 1.00 7l?.50
Acc- Urit | (suitc-codr/tow€r't ' 531=@ 1.00 531.00
Sub-Tol8I Acc. Units 344,66 E1.00 n,%335 10.00 376.00
Other Areas Area
Conidor(public) 5,670.00
CoIe (elevator, mccl|" shdt) l,082.46
Maid 218.00
go-El$at) 265.00
Sub-Totrl OthcrArers 7235.6
Accommodation Net n,933.35
Other N€t 't -235.46
TotalNet 35,168,8f
N€VGro$ DilfereDce 2J92.19 927a
Levei 3 Zehren and Associates. Inc.
1t7t99
Page 6
Vail PIaza Hotel
961070.00
Level2
Gross Square Footage '
Accomodation Units
Unit Tvne
Acc. Unit A
Acc. Urit B
Acc. Unit C
Acc. Unit D (suire-comer)
Acc. Unit E (suite- center)
Acc. Unit G (curve)
Acc. Unir | (suire-con/tower)
Sub-Total Acc. Udts
Adminstration
Execud ve Olfice
Accountins
Sub-Total Admin.
Restaurant
Specialty Rcst. (indoor)
Cocktail Lounge
Sub-Total R?steurant
Outdoor Dining
IOther Areas
-:::.--::-:J8rerlrrc [lrcnen (Jpeclally)
Rcgtrooms/CoaEt/Service
Loading Dock
Coddor (public)
Corc (elevaror, mech. shafl)
Core ($air)
.
Sub-Total Other Areas
Totals
Accommodation Net
Admitx$rarion Nct
Restaurant Net
Othfi Net
Totrl Net
Net/Grcs Difierence
l,135.00
t.135.00
zgo.oo
Area Occ. Factor Occ[panls
2,r 16.00 25.00 w.64
1.673,00 18.00 92.94
3t89.00 r77.sE
33"269.00
Unit Area'
324.75
330.75
357.75
.368.47
30?.00
370.85
531.00
'343,2E
2,i84.00
980.00
0.m
r,659.00
4,388.00
796.00
,<t 6r
E,074.6r
16,820.50
2,n0.w
3,789.00
8.V14.61
3O,954.lr
2314l.9
Level 2
Keys Total Aree
6.00 1,948.50
18.00 5,953.50
9.00 3.2t9 .7 5
5.m \u2.35
6.00 1,842.00
4.00 1,483.40
r.00 531.m
49.00 16,820,50
25.00 87.36
Decks DeckArea Tolal Deck
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
v7/99
r36.00
240.00
376.00
4_00
6.00
10.00
34.00
40.00
PageT
Va!! Plaza Horel
961070.00
Level 1
Level I
Gross Square Footage 36,497.00
Accomodation Units
Unit'Iyne Unit Area Kevs Total Area Decks Ileck Area Total Deck
Acc. Unit A 324.75 6.00 t,948.50
Acc. Unir B 330.75 14.00 4,630.50
Acc- Unit C 357;75 7.00 2-504.25
Acc. Unit D (suiB-comer) 368.47 5-00 1,842.35 4.00 34.00 136.00
Acc. Unit E (suite- ce$ter) 307.00 6.00 1,942.00 6.00 40.00 240.00
Acc. Unit I (suire{qg{lqs9d 531.00 l.m 53f.Qo
Sub.Total Acc. Unils 340.99 39.00 r339t.60 10.00 3?6.00
Retail
Unit Tvpe Area Units
Retaii AreaOne 1,045.00 1.00
Retail Arca Twe 3E8.00 , 1.00
Sub.Totsl Retail 1.433.00 2.00
Adninstration
Admin. Area Area
Front Oftice l.'112-00
Restaurant Area Occ.Iactor Occupants
Main Restaurant 2,737.00 20.00 136.85
!4b!xger 1.729.00 2o.oo 86.45
Sub-Tottl Restaurant 4,166.00 223.30
Ourdoor Dining* 757.OO 20.00 37.85
xincludcd in south outdoor area
Other Areas
Lobby (indoor) 1,913,00
Conidor (public) 8,69t.00
Sarellite Kitch€n (Main) 1,933.00
Reshooms/Coats/Scrvice 0.00
Servicc 0.00
Core (clevalor, mech- shafr) 676.00
Core (stair) 121.00
SubTotal Other Areas FJ34.00
Totals
Accommodarion Net 13,298.60
Retail Net 1,433.00
Adminislntion Net i.712.00
Restaurant Ner 4,166-00
()ther Net 13.334.00
Totaf Net Area y.2A3.&
Nel/Gross Difrerence 2253.40 94%
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
1t7t99
Outdoor Areas*Area
Page 8
Vail Plaz a Horel
961070.00
Structural Deck (nonh)
Strucmral Deck (south)
Total Structural Deck
*Deck arcas beyond gross area
Parking Provided
New Valct
E:risting Phase lll
New Full Size
SutsTotal Parking Pmvided
I1,614.00
3.634.00
15,248.00
lo
o
6l
Level I Zehten and Associates, Inc.
v7t99
Page 9
vaii Plaza llorel
961070.00
Level 0
Groas Square Footage 57265.W
Reteil
Unit Tvpe Area Units
Retail Area Tbree 1,390.00 1.00
Retail .An'n Four 420-00 1,00
Retail Arca Five 1,526.00 1.00
Retail Arca Six 1,275.00 1.00
Rehil Arca Scvcn 1.04?-00 l-00
subToral Retdl 5,65E.00 5.0o
Conference Facilities Area
Mair Ballloom* 10,162.00
Junior Ballroom 4,864.00
P.r€-CoDLelL{Publ& trrc_Llsda4 5.983.00
Sub-Total Convention 2f ,(p9.0O
*Includes 1,722 sq. ff. circularion with partitions in closed position
Kitchens
Unit Tvpe
Mair Kitchen 3,000.00 1.00 3,000.00
Barquet Kitchen 2,000.00 1.00 2,000.00
Barouet Satellite Kitchens 594.50 2.00 Lt89.00
Sub-Total Khch€tr 4.00 618900
Food and Bcverage Stora€e 1,741-00
Other Areas
Core (elcvator, rnech. shaft) 676.N
Core (stair) t43-00
ServiceCoridon 4057-00
RestroomgfTeklrhones 5CO
Total Othcr Areas 51556.00
Partine Provided
Valet Spaccs O.00
Parking Spaces (Iull Size) 23.00
.Pdfoc ft-as9{gamgeci 8.oo
Sub-Total Par&ing l3}5fi.00 31.00
Totals
Retail Net 5,658.00
Conference Nel 21,009-00
Kitchea Nct 6,189.00
F&BNct 1,741.00
Othsr Net 5,556.00
hrkins and Ramo 13-50?.00
'Iotal Net 53,660.00
Net/Gross DifrGrerrcc 3,605.$ 94Vo
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
v7t99
Page 10
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Level Minus One
Gross Square Foolage
Emolovee Facilities
Penonncl
Employce Facilities
SubTotd Employ€e Arers
Service Areas
Receiving/S torage/Trash
Laundry
Housekeepine
Sub-Tolal S€r"ice Arcas
Other Areas
l.'lcchanical (second story)
Core (elevator/mechanical)
C-orc (sIair)
Elcvotor l-obby (coridor)
Club Owner Storage Closets
Stomg€(SerYice)
Service Comdor
Sub-Toaal
Parklns Provided
Valet Spoces
Patking Spaces (Full Sizc)
Parkine Soaces {Compact)
Sub-Total Parkhg
Totals
Employee Net
Servicc Nct
Other Ner
Parking and Ramp net
Tolal Net
Nct/Gross Ditrercme
Area
34F53.00
Level - I Zehren and Associales, lnc:
lnB9
52,8rr.00
1,000.00
43m,00
3,300.00
3,t00.00
493s.00
t.723.W
7,75E.0O
1.606.00
312.00
2TI.N
30s.00
l,8l1.00
661.00
500.00
5,471.00
Smces
2.00
64.00
33.00
9.00
Area
3,300.00
7,758.00
5,471.00
34.553.00
51,082.00
r'7zt.w
o
Page 12
Vail Plsza Ho&l
961ffi0.00
Level Mlnus Tso
Grm $quare Footoge
Admtr&dratfrxr
SalcslCatcring
Servlce Areas
Brgincering
Mechatrical Plarf
ScrviEG 8ub-Total
Sm Areas
Er€rcise EquiFEnt
AsobieRmm
SobTot t Spa
Ottr Areas
Club Ourer Storage. Closeu
Cotridor (Fblic)
Corc (ckvarr, qEcll sbaft)
Core (slair)
SubTotrl Oatcr Ar€as
arg
Levcl -2 (cmt)
rmffir
sub.Toiel ltrkia
Totrls
A&dcirftation Ncr
SarviEe Net
Sps Net
OttEr I.Ist
Partinc ind Ratrp Net
Toid Nct
NetrErocg Dltrcrence
45,670.00
2,146.00
r,954.00
6.993.00
&947.00
2,936.00
2"943.00
5r79.00
|,710.00
5 387.00
324.N
379.00
7,t0o.00
rE954.00
Area
4146.00
&947.00
5,r/9.00
7,800.00
18.954.00
43;r?,5,N
1,94400
3.m
3.00
000
.14.00
20.00
64I|0
'!N%
Level -2
r,073.00
978.6't
981.00
Zehren and Associates. lnc.
\n89
ruE13
Vail Plaza Ilrtel
961070.00
Level Minus Three
Gross Area
Spa Areas
Pool Area
Pool Deck Arca
T$a!Dg!qL!&r sesms
Sub-Toaal Spa'
Retail Areas
Retail Arca Eighr (Salon)
Restaurant Areas
RestauranVJuice Bar
Other Areas
Club Owner Storage. Closets
Conidor (public)
Core (elevator, rnech. shafi)
Core (stair)
Sub-Total Otter
Parkinq Provided
Valet Spaces
Parking Spaces (Full Size)
Parkins SpacesiCompact)
Sub. Total Parking
Tolals
Spa Net
Retail Net
Restauant Net
OdEr Net
Par*ine and Ranp Net
Total Net
Net/Gr6s Difference
Level -3 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
w/99
49F66.00
3,025.00
E,268.00
10.630.00
21,v23,W
l,174.00
498.00
1,649.00
3,3t5.00
325.00
v7.00
5,66r.00
Area
2t,923.W
I,i74.00
498.00
5,66r.00
18.761.00
€,017.00
r549.00
1.00
1?.00
18.95
29.29
87.00
0.00
43.00
4!0rEt61.00 63.00
Page 14
Vail PIE:a Hotel
9610?0.00
I*vel tr!ilbus Fdr
GrcAlcr
Level 4,-5
Psrking Prod.ld
Vobtsp.css 0.00
ea*iog Spaccs lfun Sizel 45.00
HhgSrc(Conpscr) 30.00
S$-To,tnl Psrking 9,391.00 ?6.00
(Xhir Alcos
Chb Owrcc Slffiryc. Clo6ets $5.m 18.56 45.00
CodidDr{pobuc) 445.00
Colo (ahre, nrsch shoft) l5l,00
Colc(shir) 130.00
SrD-Tohloihcr L561.00
' orhti{et r.56t.00
h*ing 'id Rrmp Ncr 9.391.00
ToLl Nn4 ro952.00
NetlGro Mllcrocc 52&0|} 9s
Zehren and Associates. lnc.
WM
Page 15
Vdi Plaza Hotel
96r070.00
Parkine Reouired
Dwelline Unit
Dwelling Unit I
Club Units
Club Unit l
LiuD untt I
Club Unit 3
Club Unit 4
Club Unit 5
Club Unit 6
LIUD UNTI /
Club Unit 8
Club Unit 9
Club Unit l0
CIub Unir I I
Club Unir 12
Club Unit l3
CIub Unit 14
Club Unir 15
Total Club Units
Accommodation Units
Accommodation Unit A
Accommodatioo Urf t B
Accommodation Unit C
Accommodarion Unit D
Accommodation Unit E
Accommodation UIIit F
AccommodaDon Unit G
Accommodation Unit H
Accommodation Unit I
Total Acc. Uoits
Restaurant
specidty Resraurant
Mlin Restaurant
S@Juice Ba!
Total R€stauraDl
f,ounge
Cocktail Lounge
Lq-bby qa!
Total Lounge
Retail
Toaal Rerail
Conference
Main Ballroom
Total Required Parkins
Parking Summarv
P-S*-Fas!AI Park.Reo'd
>2000 250
Zehren and Associates. Inc.
t/7t99
Alqa
5,642.00
Area
1,987.00
.1,646.00
l,909_00
L384.W
l,93 8.00
2,052.00
Ln6.00
2,065.00
1.738.00
1,807.00
}jr r.00
l,586_00
I,619.00
2,113.00
2.309.oo
28,960.00
Park. Factor
500<2000
500<2000
500<2000
>2000
500<2000
>2000
500<2000
>2000
500<2000
500<2000
>2000
500<20(n
500<2000
>2000
>2000
Park. Rea'd
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.00
2.50
2.W
2.00
2.50
2.54
33.00
Uniis
31.00
I16.00
39.00
33.00
38.00
2.W
12.00
2.00
3.00
n6.N
Seals
M.64
136.85
29.29
250.7t
Seats
92.94
E6.45
179.39
Unit Area la!k-!ac!g!
324.75 0;72
330.75 0.73
357.75 0.76
368.4't 0.71
30?.00 0.71
432.00 0,83
.370.85 0.n
717.5Q t.t?
609.19 l.0l
343.44 0J4
Sealinq Arca
2,1 16.00
2,737.OO
49_8 00
5,351.0O
Occ. Factor
?5.00
20.00
17.00
Park. Reo'd
22.47
w.7't
lv.))
2.5.36
26.81
1.66
9.25
2.24
3.03
205.19
Park. Factor
l:8 seats
l;8 seats
l:8 seats
Park. Req'd
t0.58
17.1t
3.6
31.35
Seatins AIea Occ. Factor
t,673.00 18.00
uze.w ?q.q0-
3,402.(X)
Reail Ar€a
10,162.00
Ea&,Fae1gI Park. Reo'd
l:8 seats Ll -67
l:8 seats 10.81
22.42
Retait Area Ba*-XaelsJ psrk_8cq_d
8265.00 l:i00 sq. ti. nss
Par*. Factor Park. Req'd
I :240 sq. ft, 42.!4
Page i 6
Var'l Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Total Drvelling Unit
Total Club Unirs
Total Accornmodation Unis
Total Restaurant
Total Lounge
TouI Conference
Total Retail
Sub-Total Parhing Req'd
Parkinq Deficit (Prev. SDD)
Sub-Total Park\ Req'd
Mixcd Use Redpction (10%)
Total Partiug R€quired
Total Parking Provided
Parking Dillerence
Dwelling Unit
Club Unit
Accommodation Unit
Retail
Restaoranl
LoungdBar
C.onfere.nce
Kitchen
Food and Beverage
Front Of,6c€
SaleYcate{. (mslti-use)
Accounting
Executive Office
Recciving/Storage
Persormel (of6c€)
Employee Arcas
Laundry
Housekeeping
Engincering
Pool Decl
Exercise RoorrtE
Total Net Arca
One Berth/ 75,000 s.i
One Berth/ ?5.00O s.f.
Sub-Total Loed Berths
Mixed Use Reduction
Total Loading Berths
Parkine ProYided
Level One Patldng
Irvcl Z€rc Parting
Level Minus One Parking
I-evel Miaus Two Partins
Parking Summary
Valet
l9
0
0
Page 17
Zehren and Associates, lnc.
y7t99
2.50
33.00
205.19
J I.J)
42.34
27.55
364.3s
75:00
43935
43.94
395.42
3r4
-tlz
5,642.00
28,960.00
94,554.21
8,265.00
5,351.00
3,402.00
15,026.00
9,102-00
1,74i.00
t,712.00
2,146.00
I,135.00
1,135.00
3,.100.00
1,000.00
2300.00
2,935.00
t;123-0n
I,954.00
8,268.00
1E79.00
205,330.21
75,0m
130.330.21
I
6
-J
?
Full Size
42
@
M
Compact
0
a
33
20
Total
6l
99
&
Vail Plaza Hotel
961070.00
Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
ffit99
Lcvel Minus Three Parking 43 20 0 63
Level M!!!us !q!L!4ki!g 46 30 0 16
Total Parking Provided 262 l1l 2t 394
P€rcentage 6Vo 28Eo S% l0Qio
Page l8
o
Vail Plaza Hotel
96r070.00
Dwelline Units
Dwelling Unir I
CIub Units
Club Unit I
Club Unit 2
Club Unit 3
Oub Unir 4
Club Unit 5
Club Unit 6
Club Unit 7
Club Unit 8
Club Unit 9
Club Unit l0
Club Unit I I
Club Unit 12
Club Unit l3
Club Unit 14
Club Unit l5
Toaal Club Units
Accommodation Units
Accommodation Unit A
Accommodation Unit B
Accommodation Unit C
Accommodation Unit D
Accommodadon Unit E
Accommodation Unit F
Accommodation Unit c
Accommodario n Unit tI
Accomrnodation Unit I
Total Acc. Units
Totsls
Restaurant
Specialty Restaurant
Outdoor Dinine (Specialty)
Sub.Total Spcclalty Restauranl
Main Restaurant
Outdoor Dinins (Mainl
Sub-Totel Mein Restaurant
Sub-Tolel Spa Juice Bar
l otal Rcstaumnt (Indoor)
Total Rcsouram (Outdoor)
Total R€staurant
Lounge
Program Summary
Upper Area Lower Area Total Area
1.516,00 4.126.00 5,642.00
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
It-il99
Bedrooms Pillows
5.00 , 14.00
Bedmoms Pillows
3.00 8.00
3.00 8_00
4.00 10.00
4.00 12.00
3.00 8.00
4.m 10.00
2.00 6.00
4.00 10.00
3.00 8.00
3.00 8.00
4.00 10.00
3.00 8.00
3.00 8.00
3.00 E.00
4.00 !qs9
50.00 132.00
_Brdrsslq! Pillows
3r.00 62.00
I 16.00 232.00
39.00 ?8.00
33.00 66.00
38.00 76.00
2,m 4.00
t2.00 24.00
2.00 4.00
3.00 6.00
276,W 552.U)
Uoper Area
i92.00
432.00
432.00
592.00
550.00
519_00
445.00
519.00
569.00
1,807.00
526.00
431.00
431.00
526.00
2.309.00
r0,6E0.m
Raom Arca
324.15
330.75
35'1 .7 5
364.47
307.00
432.4O
370.85
7 t7 .50
609.19
3/.3.4
Lower Area
1,395.00
1,214.00
|,47'1 .00
t,192-W
r,388.00
r,533.00
831.00
1,546.00
1,169.00
0.00
4005.00
1.155.00
I,I 88.00
1,587.00
0.00
rE,2E0.OO
Rooms
31.00
I 16.00
39.00
33.00
38.00
2.00
t 2.00
2.00
3.00
n6.@
20.00
20.00
20.00
17.00
2t.34
44e.
22.05
18.00
20.00
Deck Area
4'14.W
Deck Area
146.00
88.00
88.00
145.m
88.00
88.00
8E.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
88.00
109.00
1,457.00
Deck Area
Kevs
2.00
Keys
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
t.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
43.00
K!y!
31.00
I r6.00
39.00
33.00
38.00
2.00
12.00
2.00
3_00
276.00
321.00
Total Area
1,987.00
r.646.00
1,909.00
2,384.00
r,938.00
2.Q52.00
1,276.00
2,065.00
r,738.00
r,807.00
2,531.00
1,586.00
1,519.00
2,I 13.00
2.309.00
2E,960,0O
Total Area
10,067.25
36,367.00
ll0<, ,{
12,159.51
t 1,666.00
864.00
4,450.20
1,435.00
t.827.s7
94J48.7E
129,39O,74
Seats
u.64
u.i6
172.00
t36.85
!-E5
til4:70
29.29
250.78
t25.2.1
375.99
92.94
86_45
Page 19
5?8.00
r,066.00
1,644.0O
3,575.00 331.00 698.00
Searing Ar€a Occ. Factor
2,116.00 25.00
2.184.00 25.00
4,300.00 25.00
o:;ifrf*-
2;137 .00
757.N
3,494.00
498.00
5,351.00
2.941.00
8,292.N
1,673.00
1.729.00
Vail Plaza Hotel
96r070.00
Total Loung€
Program Summary
3,40400 1t.96 179.39
Retail Retail Are4 Units
Retail lrvel One L433.00 2.00
Retdl Level Zero 5.658.00 5.0O
Retail l-evel Minus Three .!.174.00 1.00
Torai Retail 8"265.0,0 t.00
Conference Facilites
Main Ballroom 10,162.00
JuniorBallroom 5,595.00
Prc-Convenc/Public Circulation 5.451.00.
Sub-Total ConYention 2130E.00
Sos
Spa l*vel -2 5.&79.00
Spa Level -3 2f..923.00
TotdSpa ?,802.00
Storage Closets Total AI€a Clos€t Are_4 Closcts
Levcf -l Club Storage Closet l,8ll.00 20.82 87.00
kvel -2 Club Storagc Closets 1,710.00 19.00 90.00
Levcl -3 Club Stornge Closets 1,649.00 18.95 87.00
Level -4 Club Stola€qlelq!€E 835.00 lEJ6 45.00
Tolel Club Slorage. Cloccts 6,0O5Jn l9A3 309.00
Parking Provided
Level One Parking
Level Zero Parking
I*vel Minus Onc Parkiog
Lcvcl Minrs Two Parking
Level Minus Three Parking
Level Minus Four Parkins
Total Parking hoyided
Percentage
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
tnt99
Full Size Compact valct Toral
420196l
23 8 0 3l
&33299
4420064
432n063
46 30 p. 16
2.62 llt 2t 394
6% 2E% S%
Page 20
lr EEF d:
r$s':
E
rfi
i; i: *i,,8?cEs9;iei$iis$s??ir*isg3'$ifuggi iE EE
9r I:o F
I* 8
i* e
g
9B I
:. qEX C
:* 4ss F
3s 3
!r 8:He pd
i* E
a-
is
t5F
Erg-
s$ ii$Fga3EFsi33i!;iiiiiiEaiFFgaiE$3ca:a$
?Eg s IJ,le 3 - 3
l|e €e = 8 ce :g: iF F : EE I
qt t aH! Fd s g BB a-qr:' i; F i f : ES
dF EE : - a8 s!gR iqi i ! ER !*
na rs ^e ie qI5 ?|f,. FeE -{n vii i :F 4$
at'?: fi F;: sqiE r *- 6-' F rA
flE E 3i g FE 3 e: ^8 iril q i:. * :.= 3 Fi 5A 3
-4t sarce 3 e g ee tg* liinq i i -i g; E E 3
as E E:s: Eelg 3 IJd *
== -q;':.
rl 3 qqqq-s ceeclq e Iga *Ci$l EEIF*i 3*
TE g ii EE:FEF i$st i i3 ""i."'!-j c
'?l e 3 r 8te E qe8g I3! i 5 s*g n nillq i
1€ 8 seqa I3: iEEnE 3
tt
otu26i
bT
tg
0
a!o-g
*-r!
E ilil
=Ellifralll
1^v
€,Ho=r
GN6&
'a
tro
(!
oE
)
L--\
r s3 i : i gi i ! :I ll r { I t r E t E
! . :!: ? :.
E I It
i
I
I
I
I
t!-l:
€tttE
I<t
t)IL
!
I
I
I
-'l
I-)
l-i--1_
!
Itl
(
I
I
I(
tn
.9:E{\8-^aQJ 'IE
t/Lv
!i
II
I
I
I
(
L;
(
t-\
I
I
I
t
i-l
lrC
(
.lLr
I
I
(
I
I
!
-Ecoi()';
=-|!q
€)+JoT
G
N6
a=
6d
i
t<
I
;
I
i
ii-;: EEqEttti!ltt!iiiii Hii
i $:I = =I lill ! !i iiii 4 i
g itii
n iiir
ets
th5seb
€iz.l_s
€,
oJ
/^\Y
€)4JoTd:=o
ffi€i6::
CI->
"E
r 3ti!llr ar E lti
u]|=Eili
il?E!:
(
2t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I\
)
(
I
I
-_-__--)i- - ^'-/
,'--" - t
I
r"-
i
r---11----itt I
llriii--.'lltllltltlrfllttta,I
III
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
It:=:::-.:J
I
I
L----_-_--____rlr
r!
t--------
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
,
(ugst-t-
@a5CEr
<a!zs
@
€)
/v
(a)\. +=r')O
JL_o." \-"' REr,) G::
l\_=\o_ >
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
\ .--rlrlr
)
(
I
I
-'--"')
I
I
I
t.-'
l\L----------___ J
)
)
I
I
I
I
I
rE
a-
\..
\r, ,-
". -)
--l
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
L__
E Alii
I !iir
(!-tFHHHc:]El:
lrl
L-----:
('--
t'
\ ---j
tl
I\
)
(
.--"--t
o
3t_r-
@
=3eB
n
=5<-g
(u
oJ
/L\Y
I
I
I
-__j
I
I
(
)
€)4roT.-l-
6d
N
-Etu
G
o
F6g
=d
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-l
I
-
E Alii
n ilir
\"'' ."-",
\ ''-' ',, -.-.." ',..-^-.\\--
\r-*------_l
qqqqs! ltx llt qrou!!
Jf$ rrc ssc [U[[
ld
ES
F
I
\
)
(
I
I
-------t
I
I
o
o L|4b
.=+E,
o
oJ
1\t
o
o
:-
o
6dE',.Ni3
.: 6 I-:\,F S'!::
G
f----_-----
I
r ilttlrllrl!tlL-------- -------- -:----::---::___---J I
('--'--t
I
)
(--r
I
!----r
f
f[lll
9b
I
ttlii
etoN
o
oJ
ott
Fo-=9
{!l
€J4Jro=tr
t€iN
_cL
I
i
L
IIL--- --- ----
IIItII
IF-:--"---Iti
,---i 6d
LL-l.)
g ilil
n iiir
I
!i
Jl
atl
't
t!bg
.a ,l
:lj-a!
r;Iii
fr!iir
(u
=o
o
oJ
1^v
@Po:i-
6
N
_qo-
:6
(
-
rtl\ii .,,j
i
I
,'{
.l
!
!!td
€
atl6g
E+
nt
r 3llid
=
il.I
5 l;;lNU!I;
o
3l_
(D
oJ
/^v
€)
o-tr
-l G
NG
L
"E
t
t
I
T
!
I
?
t'
REu16:r
E3
E ilii
n !iir
og
[_l-
E
(DJlL\v
€)Ho
I
rd
i
7t1/l
E
=O+LLd
s!?n
CJJ
/v
o
RErG::Es
E Elil
=
iiir
€)Po
tl
6
t
I
#-11 |
HI
</l
L
tl
?
lttbg
l!
F AIiI
=
iiirN?{I;
{ak>
llr\_
CI
€)z1
/v
g
b
._r_
G
N
_q
o-
G
I-
I
{x
f iF i(: I'(D {diJ
t!
:a
=.!
E alil
=
Iiir
nr i IIi
/Lv
€)+-roT+:3
6N
_€L
G
I
ffi
-
Y)
e
@
ot41
o
alJ
,ErgE-
N5grg_-;
nt-
@
6
I
fg
.^
b
J
i6
Hxiii
?
tl
Enlbg
.--t -
(!
r Stitd, S ldr
n !iir
s.s
UJ
€)
oJ
/^\v
a)
O
ll
G
N6
AE:
6d
-
IEIGlEs\.* {'CIs
o,cM
o
NErEJ
E Alil
n !Eir
/^\v
€)Ho
T
"E
-
c
_c
a=
+.J Ee:EEa'E g+T'g'-
bo gt
oEtr
==6
/\v
!!!qisi::::'l,iltiitltt I .nd t
IoT
6E_Nil6d:i
n
6d
E:
ii,:tilti;i-.' ,l
ft
=
Stiis 3:.3
=
liiiu?ili
' ,'m' ,''4,
t!
I
I
I
I
ii
.L_U \I
rnMl,lt,
I
1...
=_qLg
ortr!c)*
oa
ts7v
d.E
F$;tG::F's
zE!!l
H s;ti
H liit
@Ho
=
(g
---1
44
&
\
#i
I
!
4r
#
ef
ffi,q
$
tr/
#
#
%
e
e
_€
tu
Asioi.E;
-GT
u
U
//^v
@
o
J
dtHlY"nt\.q;G:3
CI->
E elii
=
liilruElii
(6
''
==Y,
€
G
o--\
C6
k?\!, dt
Ut-
@4=J
CI--tl
€
N
_qAt+
ed
/^\v
a,c-egoi(J-
'tg
h*fiiii: - lxe
iu ? lli
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
i
{
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
l
I
l
I
i
I
I
^ai..Y
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-,IY
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
i
I
I
1
l
I ,1tl\,/' tl
t
b
:tt
-cItll
€
EeB,q;
=
h*liti
c'
L
Eo
_€
=U
U
/Lv
@Po-r=
6
N
-Ga=
6
T.
F
it.
t!
a
U)
'e
-l(l)+ir-t €.-€\Fl €\
f{ Fr
cBaNh6l-EFEFrg
-O.-Z
.ct
fi!i$'ru?!
ffi*
U1
IA
{
F!)
|rl(l)+.i-r €.- o\Fll €\
ftli Fr
c{3
Na5\I €FErrg
Fl .O.42
.ct
:IiiiF
rrt? E
l,r'TF..flT;i; ";i;1':' i.. );I Fi-,S..
t\I
an
art
B
Q)
Frl(
C)+.e8FF €\
l-l Fi
ccHNhcl ^E
-EFrg
-.O.-z
.6l
lii:e
ffie
cl
an
u,h
>{)
€g\
6\
?a
!i(Ds
!u
z
:il1ir
Nii
ffiE
-c){r)oH)rl
GNc!FI
Fr
-l.!l
.Gt
(?
e,
,h
B
at)
,.':',
:,rrJ:.'l.
,. t::
r, i. i,
l:. :: :' :a ;li
i,.: fiiiir;'l.'"j
.. i ti"
:!t.,i,:. ::.. i., :r
:.ii:,i L: : r. -, ' '.. ,.....t:.
;'r r. -
".
:.
.'.
Ti
€)lr),lY
FFtfr|
ctNGFr<
Fr
-.-
.G
€g\g\
(a
L
€)
q)
z
lili$
€ffi*
(a
0
AA
cl
F6)
€g\g\
(a
lio
{)
z
-4q)+)AYHH
GN
cgFlA.
-
-l.i
,cg
Iriiip
';' 11;, {ii; Biffi Fr' .q,. r.:-:t: :-:',.
ffi
rii
u)o
7c)
Frl
€JtF)A6v€\f+l a\l{-'|daNaEUF
-Er{g
-.ooAZ
.6t
:iiE$-
t,ti E
r+
tt
IA
'6)
-0)*r)A€.ri o\FFI €\
Fl tll
ca
Nuqo
zir EHg
-O.iz
.Gl
:iliii
ruiE
FEt'ENi
rf)
a
o
'0)
€o\o\
(.)
li{)€
(|)
z
-lq)
*.AY
t-i
6tNG
-lrlFt
Fr(.!l
.Gt
:iiiii-
r,..r? E
-tq)
{rJ
-r€.\q€\FF C'\
FI FT
63Nh
Gl.E:lr El.t{ g
-g.-Z
c!
rlilib
r..r1 i
bffe
\o
e1
o
B
€)
-q)
*lAG.\q cnFtl 6\
f{ Fr
G3Nh
Gl^E
-EF.i g
-.O.42
.Gt>
ze!: "c rr
Xc iiiil
;9 EE|;I
'3 Ei!l
Nl E
\o
u)
.a
qt
Fe
(De\€\
cr)
li
Q)
€)
oz
-(l)
{.4A'YIril-l
GN
CB
-F{
E.E
G
tii!!i'
Nl E
tr
t)
t)
al
F(D
(F
€Ac\
(?)
h{)
()
oz
-q)
.{rr
AYFFF(
6tNG
-A,
-
-.l
.G
;iiiiii
N:5
trffiH
r\'
tn
o>
ct
'o
(p
C'\q\
ra
Lq)
€
O
oz
rl()+rArvHt-l
GN
c!
-A.
Fl.Fl
6l
:iiiii'
H?Eo
€
0
.r2
B{)
€€\o\
(a
lr
l|J
q)
oz
t-lc)
'{raol+lt*r
€\tN6lFl
Fi
-r-
G
Ililir
lxl
t\
,i \\
\\\i
.,'i \.,t
rj'1,),,\
N
-JZSS
EEi
8=E
,(\
\\
f .'1
iii
{ '.,
l--:t+ I
EiiliagE
tiiilEErE9*('
o
t
=EFzIFotuv,
IJJEoO
uJ(,
<tJJ
=o
=ao
=o
=oJfE
q"
%
%
>"r-&rfu
,,r*
Jan O6 39 O4:O3p CHHRLES R. LIPCON 1 -S70-4?6-8G8 I
ORIGINAL
JOHN BREYO
Vail Gatenay Unit 3
12 S. Frotage Road
Vail, Co. 81657
Jmuary 5,1999
George Rlttrer
SeniorPlmer
TolmofVsil
Fax:479-2452
Re Vail Village lnn
DearMr- Ruther
Ttis is to confirmthe following:
L I am the ovrmer of Unit 3 in the Vail Grtervey. It is ilirectly adjaco to the Village h HdeL
2. I hsve not reoeiverl ruittem notioe from the Town of Vril nor from Stoltz l\fimegement aborn the
Village h proposel u abon any Plming md Envir@tal Comissim meeings I object to any
meetings without properr and achral unitten notice.
3. I purchased my unil relying in part on thc orising ma*er plan aad exi$ing SDD rpptovnl
4. I object to the Village h violrting tre mrster plu" the SDD approwt rd blocking the visw
corridor towards Gold Peak
VeryTmty'Yourg
ffirt"Brpr,^
JohBreyo \J
p.1-trF"'tr''
JAN-€?-1999 L6t46 SIEVEN JFN1ES RIDEN AIA AR ss 949 A3U P.A?
PboE o?0.'|r,{21
FAX 9?O9{!10rxrrrril rlle€lYdtDd
Grcr nc,
lbcffi.r Bfigls viil co
Er@&4tr
{166&fiEdffi|fi.
$/ednesday, January 6, l9SS
I\fiembers of the Tovn of vail plannlng ard Bnulronmeutal cmudssior
Departonent of Community Deyelopment
vail, CO 8t65z
Re VailPlazaHotel
DearMembers
I luve been asked to make an objegtive eyaluAfion of the proDed Vall Dlsza
Hotel arul analize the pOtenflal dekinenE tOn the rcalizadon sf this dgrrelopmetrt_ I
have reviewed the subnitbl aod the buowingam commeuts tor -\e re@It
I\dy Rrst observation ls as to tte ovel?ll '4asshg and sr.qre of the rleveLolment.
The scale !s far beyond what I see as cmuntible wlth tbe surmrurriing strustrrEs the
proposed proJect absolutsly dwaffi the Vail Gateway and rlses far above any otler
structuE in tbe lmmediate area . The prcposal indicales thatthere rf,iU be large nassirg
at tlre ealges of the bonnderlee ofthe proBerty end wlthout any requil€d.setbacb ftom
the adjacent Durk[ugs uor is tlerc any steppllt dthe sh&ture ln a retationehtp b the
exi$Ung bufldlngs- It would. seen tbat thts ls not the htenUon of atry of the prwlous
approvals or atry of tlle underllnlng mning from wbtch the sDD has been baseal
AU 0f the pedfstriatr sllace is surloufited by structure that ts often 40 to ?0 feet
rtr belght creating areas thatvu be pernaneuEv in shadorv and ofrrtnE very lttfle
openness or landscaping and unless you are withitr the buildlng rbelf tlere is not any
protection from the micro dlmates llr tne area Eeated by the nBw stnrcture such as
wind- This desigu 0oes not create any eueloilre.
33gs(ss fhe applicans ormshrdy of the shadows, the fton@e mad worildstqo
remain ia shadov and vlsually create a rrall dstructue that pmhtbits any view
beyond" What ever haBpened. to view corrldor that hlfla\y l"shicted the development
surrounding the roundabout? Those restrlcH,ons have bem in place since the earltegt
Broposals hr this area were trrtsentril It ls obvtous tbat the lntent ofprevious revienr
decisions hetdthe heleht to matntatn thrs vlef,..
I stoulo lrke to quesuon tne vaudlBr of such a gross devtauon b tle aplrwed
SDD espectauy wh€n tt appears that tbls prdect slgntflcanw lncreases ttre size abovc
the Brevious approval and etsentialy ftubles the ilensibl and height ofthe undarlirdng
JHN-i4'/-1:r:rJ L6=4'l SIEVEN Jf]]'IES RIEN RIff RR s3 949 A3U P.A3
zoning. Js thic the wqr the lvla8ter Ptan ttlteltded the devel0pmeDt to Droeeed? I believe
upon carem €xamtnaflon you wlll !fll tl|ts Droject does not meet that crtterla
Additionally I would like to touc,h trtrnn ottrer aspests of tltc propml. According
to the submittal, the traffic stu(y inficates that there would be lltfle eftct upon the
dsdng conditions, but I vorild terd to diftF on tlls lggsuse rhis prqlect would only
besn t0 set a Brecedent for othea that would evenfirally maxinize the camcit of the
roundabout and tt ls clefi'that rhis qor, creates an attev out orthe froutase rmil and
diminishes the cbaracter qf tlre entance to the vilage- The moilel utilizedhr thtc stuo,
does not take this lnto consid€rztior-
Generally the re$est b $egdncanfly reduee tbe setbacks require the aDDltcant
to show tjrere would be a bardshlp. I cannot *e the hanl shlp in this case- Agatn there ir
very little consid€ration glrren b tlp rrgighhodng dev3lopmenl
A nnal questiou. Wes not a silmllar but smaller DrcJect for fhis alea ferdously
rcjected by the council and plannlng comtrission? And what bas charge to make tus
approval?
Sincercly,
Steven James Riden AJ.A. Archttect
TOTRL P.63
/ail Village Inn
Subject: Vail Village Inn
Date: Thu, 7 Ian 1999 22:0'7:14EST
From: Sealaw@aol.com
To : ford@vail.net, "George Ruther" <gruther@ci.vai1. co.us>
CC: bryanwachs@pobox.com, John Dunn <1ex@vail.net), LEdwal234@aol.com,
Hanna@aol. com, David <DavidHanna@sota.com), kinney@sequelvc.com,
JFlamont_EVHA@email.msn.corn, palrnos@privatei.conq sriden@vail.net
CHARI-IES R. LIPCON
Vail Gateway Unit 5
L2 S. Frontaqe Road
Vai1, Co. 81657
re1 . (970) 4?6-5151Fax. (970) 476 - 8581
.fanuary 7 , L999
Mayor Rob Ford and Town Couocil Members,
Planning and Environmental Commission,
and George Ruther, Senior Planner
_t o$rn ot var" t
Faxz 479 -2452
Re: Vail Village lnn
Dear Sirs and Madams:
One or more of the residentj-al property o\dners at the Vail- caLeway have thefollowing objections to the Vail Village Inn A Major Amendment to Special
Devel"opment District *6 as foilows I
1. The application for Planning and Environnental Comnisslon Approval was
signed by Jay K. PeLerson as attolrney in fact on April 13, 1998. I received a
copy of the Limited power of attorney signed by Waldir R. prado as managingdirector on Jan. 4, L999. A revie$/ of the power of attorney indicates that;
THE POWER OF ATTORNEY IS SPECIFICALLY LIMITED TO CHAPTER L2-9a-2. THIS CHAFTER
DEALS WITH DEFINITIONS. THE POWER IS INVALID ON ITS FACE TO AUTHORIZE JAY
PETERSON TO SIGN AN APPLICAT]ON FOR PITANNING AND EWIRONMEMAL COMMISSION
APPROVAL WITH RESPECT TO A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO AN SDD. FuTtheT, theTe isnothing in the record with the town that wouLd indicated that Waldir Prad.o was
the duLy appointed managing director of Dalzmer Corp. or that DaFer Corp. has
through it.s board of direcLors approved. the granting of a power of attorney to
Jay K. Peterson,
2. In spite of numeroug requesls, nej.ther I nor any of the other residential
owners in the Vail Gaterrray, to my knowledge. have been given notice of any
hearings what so ever in front of the Planning and Environmental Comnission.Notice to Stoltz Manaqement is not adequate since they do,/did not in turnprovide notice to the owners in t.he Vail- Gateway. This information aboutlack of nolice was previously provi.ded to you. YOU HAVE ACTUAL., NOTICE THAT THE
GIVING OF NOTICE TO STOLTZ !4ANAGEMEMI DOES NOT IN TURN RESUI.,T IN NOTICE TO THE
CONDOMINIUM OWNERS IN THE VAIL GATEWAY. This is specially troublesome in lightof the fact that Stoltz Management or their principals ldas represented by Jay
Peterson who is also the clained aLtorney in fact and bhe attorney for Daymer
Corp ,
3. The Tovrn of Vail ordinance 12-3-5 C. dealing with notice constitutes adenial of due process and equal protection of the law for the owners in thevail- Galeway and other adjacent condominiurn owners since it does not provide
for actual notice to them as adjacent property owners. YOU tiAVE BEEN
PREVIOUSITY INFORMED THAT THE GIVING OF NOTICE TO STOLTZ MANAGEMENT DOES NOT IN
TURN RESUI-,T IN NOTTCE TO THE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS IN THE VAIL GATEWAY. As such
of4 1i8il99 8:24 AM
Vail Vi[aee Inn
l.t is uncons t i tuti onal . A letter from John Breyo, owner of Unit 3 in the Vail
Gateway was faxed to you indicaLing lack of notice as well as retiance on t.hemaster pl,an, zoning, etc.
4. The amendment violates the ,'view corridor'r from the four way stop (now
roundabout) established in the SDD approval for the ViLlage Inn. Based on this
'rview corridor'l , the height of the vail Gatehray was reduced. In Rick pyl-man's
(Town Planner for Vail) letter dated Feb. 15, 1988 discussing the Vai]
Gateway, he stated! "SLaff feels strongly that this buildins (Vai! Gateway)should present no encroachment into the view corridor that is estabfished bythe approved Vail Village Inn developnent.. The existing design will requiresubstantial revisions to maintain the view parameters estabi-ished by t.he WI . "
It would be unfair, arbitrary, and unreasonable to have reduced +-he heiqht ofthe VaiL Gateway based on the ,'view corridor,' in the SDD ordj-nance for theVj-llage Inn and then to turn around and ignore the same requirernent for t.heVillage Inn ihself. The agreement betrdeen Joe Stauffer and the Town of Vail as
document,ed in the SDD approval constitutes a record.ed real covenant that
i-nures to the benefit of the adjacent land owners who rel"ied on this real
covenant. The SDD approval provides for a three story bui.lding in the ,'view
corrj-dorr! area. The SDD approval was the result of give and take negotiations
between the Town of VaiI and Joe Stauffer. Joe Stau€fer agreed to two storybuildings on East Meadow Drive and Vail Road in return for a five storybuilding on Frontage Road. In adoition to constltuting a real covenant, the
SDD approval constitutes a contract between the Town of Vail and ,foe Staufferwhich inures to the benefit oE adjacent olrners as third party beneficiaries.
5. The amendmenL violates the Town of Vail Master P1an. The master plan stateswith respect to the Vail Village Inn: "Mass of fuildings shall step up fromexisting pedestrian scale alonq Meadow Drive to 4 5 stories aLong FrontageRoad,..,Design must be sensitive to naintaining view corridor from 4-way stopto Vail Mountainu The WI proposal will directly i,mpact t.he character of thevail vi11age. If approval of the amendmenE is alLowed, where will it stop.
Wonrt the owners of the Holiday House property, the gas station and otherswant to have the same massive size to maximize the value of their properties.
Perhaps the vail Gateway would like to add another 4 floors a1so. The entranceto the Vail Village wou1d be a rnassi-ve canyon of buitdings more in keepingwith a large city rather than a unique ski vil}age.
6. The Villaqe Inn project does not coordinate well with the Vail Gaterrray. Itcuts off its pedestrian access and drastical"l-y reduces its visibility. Thiswould be particularly harmful to the commercial tenants in Lhe buildinq. The
Town of Vail j-n ccnsidering the Varl Gateway SDD application required that a
major entrance be placed on the side of Lhe building facing the Village fnn.
That entrance would be virtually worthless under the Vil-lage Inn proposal .
The Vail Gate$/ay would be facing a large wal-1 that goes up 95 feet which wouLdonly be a few feet from the Vail cateway property. A canyon would be created.This is not in keeping with the initial representation made by the Vail
Vj-lLage Inn to the Town of Vail, that: "The architects Zehren & Associates
were challenged to accommodate this program in a configuration harmonious tothe inmediate neighborhood and add Lo the Vail Character. " There is nothing
harmonious abouE this project as it relates to the Vail cateway and it iscertainly not in keeping with the VaiI Character. Tt is a bj-g city project
being urged on a sma11 village.
During the appLication process for the Vail cateway, it vras required thaL a
najor entrance be pfaced for access from the Village Inn property. Tn Rick
Pylman's (Town Planner for vail) letter dated Feb. 16, 1988 he st.ated: 'twefeel t.hat. 1t will be important that this project anal the approved Vail Villaqe
Inn project when built, have a stronq pedestrian connectj.on. we recognize Lhe
need f or the developer of the WI pro j ect to relat.e hi s pro j ect to the Vai 1
Gateway. We do want to ensure, however, that the design of the Gateway allows
Lhis pedestrian connection to occur, "
7. The Vil1age Inn project comes withj"n 2 feet or so of the Vai.l Gateway
2of4 l/8/99 8r4 AM
'ail Village Inn
driveway where cars enter t,he garage and deliveries are made. It would creaEea large alley that would cause auto and diesel fumes Lo accumulaLe and enterthe Vail Gateway. this wouLd be noxious, odorous, harmfuL to health, and
perhaps deadly. A study should be done to determine the buil-dup of carbon
monoxide and other ilangerous fumes that woul-d enter the Vail Gateway and theViliage Inn fron this area,
8. The Village Inn project would cut off sunLight and air for the Vail
Gateway. The Vail cateway would for the most part be in the shadow of theVillage Inn.
9. The traffic, noise, and accompanying pollution in the area of the
rouDdabout. VaiL Road, and Frontage Road rlrouLd increase dramatically. The
roundabout presently backs up ah cerbain times of the day, and the increase in
the number of cars will only exacerbate the problem. The Traffic ImpactAnalysis done by Feisburg, Hutt & Ul]evig is based on the assumpti.on that 50%of the traffic is internal and as such reduced their trip generation figuresby 50%. This ignores the fact that the Vail Villaqe has a free transportatj.on
systen that is unique. Even assuming a 50t reduction, the overaLl traffic
increases from about 1050 trips per day to 3100 trips per day. THIS IS A
TRIPLING IN TRAFFIC. ff the assumed reduction figure is wrong Lhen the
increase could be as nuch as six fo1d. An increase percentage of 2% was usedto indicate that the traffic would go to 4600 vehicles durinq the PM peak hourin the year 2015. This assunes that further large hotel projects sinilar tothe Villaqe fnn will not be approved, which would be unrealistic if thisproj ect is approved. Tbere wouLd be a Domino effect.
L0. No studies have been filed to refLect the polluLion 1eve1s that would comefrom the increased traf f ic .
11. The owner of the ViLlage Inn knew at the tine of its purchase what was
allowed and what was not allowed under the SDD approval in place at the time.
The Village Tnn proposal would change the rules and \^rou1d greatl-y increase thevalue of the Village Inn property and at the same tlrne dirninish the value ofthe Vail Gateway pxoperty as well as other adjacent property owners. It would
be unfair to provide the Village Inn ov/ner with a financial- wind fall at the
expense of the Vail Garehray owners.
12. Owners in the Vail cateway purchased their properties and spent moneyfixing them up relying on t.he approvals already in place for the Village Inn,including the view corridor, as well as the master plan. As such changing
these items would constitute an inverse condemnation of the ownershipinterests of the vail Gateway owners. The val"ue of the VaiI Gateway owners
would be reduced so as to provide a windfall to the owners of the Vail Village
fnn .
1-3. The Vail master plan which was enacted by ordinance cannot be violated
under the guise of an SDD, withouL chanqing the master plan itself. Attorney
,John Dunn has previously submitted a rnemorandum of 1aw on this issue. The
Villaqe Tnn acknowledge this when they submitted a I'Revision of Vail Village
Masier Plan- Conceptual Building Heiqht P1an...D on Nov. 30, 1998.
14. The Village Inn proposal has not discussed the hazard of a fire spreadingto or from bheir buildings to the Vail Gateway in lighL of their extremelyclose proximity. (The fact thab the proposed Vail Village Inn has exteriorfireproofing does not apply to the Vail cateway and the Village Inn Condo
which does not have special fireproofinS.) What further problems would thiscreate for the fire departnent if a fire had bo be fought? AIso there is no
showing that the Toh/n of VaiI fire department could handle a fire in abuildinq of this size and height.
15. What assurances has t,he o$rner of the Villaqe Inn provided that it has thefinancial and real estate capability to build what they say they want tobuild.? What assurances have they provided that t.hey are trustworthy and rrrill
of4 1/8t99 824 AM
Vail Village Inn
do what they say they will do? Dal.mer Corporation N.V. has reportedly beenpreviously invoLved in litiqation where cLaims were made of wrongful conductby Dalrmer. Dayner should make a full disclosure of prior litigation and itsoutcome to properly assess its trustrrrorthiness. Also its true ownership sbouldbe revealed since it is a Netherlands Antilles Corporation.
16. The sinulated pictures submitted by the Vail Village Inn are nisleading.View anaLysis number three shows a nine story VaiL Vill-aqe Hotel- not rnuchhigher than the adjacent five story Vail Gateway. If the true height of theVail Villaqe fnn was depicted the r,rhole of the Golden peak area would beblocked. Even the incorrect picture submitted shows that the view of the
Golden Peak area wouLd be alrnost completeLy blocked,
17. The sal,es tax revenues projected to the Town of vait are based on numerousassumpti.ons. What guarantees or bonds have the Village Inn offered if theirprojectlons are wrong. If the Village Inn j,s seeking to notivate the Town ofVail by the promise of addi-tional funds, certainly they should stand behindthe numbers and provide a guarantee or bond from a fi.nancialty sound thirdparty to back up their numbers.
18. The Village Inn should provide compensatj.on to the adjacent property
owners, whose values will go down as a result of the Village Inn viol,ations ofthe master plan as well as the agreenent between the Tohrn of Vail and JoeStauffer as codified in the SDD approval .
19. The Vail- Plaza Hotel Fact Sheet is mj.s1eadj.ng. It indicates that the 1992approval allowed a buildinqr heiqht of 57 feet. IL does not indicate that thisheight applied to the building on Frontage Road and does not apply to thebuildings that would be south of the Vail Gateway. (Between the Vail Gateway
and the ski mountain)
20. The report of the Town Planner is expected to be done by the end of theday on Friday Jan. 8, 1999. It. is unknown if sufficien! time wiLl be availableto review the report prior to the PEC rneeting scheduled for Monday Jan. 11,
1999. As such tbe right to object on this ground is reserved until such timeas the report has been provided and studied.
21. No view corridor analysis was done other than provj-ding photos so of
which are misLeading. A view corridor analysis was requested in the memorandunto the Pl-anning and Environmental Conmission dated June 22, 1998.
22. No urban desi.gn analysis was done. An urban desiqn analysj-s was requestedin the memorandum to the Planning and Environnental Commission dated ,June 22,
1998.
23. The Town Planning departnent was unable to locate the original SDD
approved drawings for the Vail Vil1aqe Inn referenced in Ordinance No. 7,
Series of I976. These are needed for review and reference particularly in
terms of the View Corridor.
Where applicabLe the same objections are being made to the Faessler Amendmentsto the Publ.ic Accornmodation Zone Districc.
Very Truly Yours,
Charles R. Lipcon
4ot4 li8l99 8r4 AM
January 7,1998
Mr. Rob Ford
Mayor, Town of Vail
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Fax;970.479.2452
Dear Mr. Fonl and Mr. Ruther.
I would like to formally object to the proposed Vail Village Imr's Special Development District
as defined for the Vail Village Inn (VVD site. As a year-round resident of the Village Inn Plaza
Condominiums, which are adjacent to the proposed Vail Village Inn development, I am disturbed
with apparent disregard for the curent planning guidelines and the magnitude and armgarrce of
the proposed development
As proposed the site, referred to as Special Development District Nurnber 6 (SDD #6), grossly
exceeds the APPROVED development standards conained in the SDD #6 legisiation as well as
some guidelines in the Vail Village Master Plan. Specifrcally, at issue are the Gross Residential
Floor Area and the heiglrt of the proposed building. Currently, the proposed plan violates an
established view corridor tbat has a controlling effect upon buildings in SDD #6. Likewise, the
proposed plan totally disregards the Vail Village Master Plan height guidelines.
As the owner of the southwest unit in the Village Inn Plaza Condominiums, fte proposed plau
l) eliminates all western exposure to the mountains and the sun,
2) places truck docks literally against a bedroom wall,
3) eliminates any privacy from my patios, and
4) zuggests traffic patterns that will be unacceptable.
Does the proposed plan compensate my potential loss in real estate value? Does the pmposed
plan cornpensate me for several years of dirt and consffuction noise? Can you boldly eliminate
values that were developed to protect my neighbors and me?
I am not opposed to change. I also believe that a quality hotel would, in the long run, enhance the
core of the Village" What I am opposed to is the blatant and reckless disregard to guidelines *rat
were established to preserve the integrity of Vaii Village and to protect individuals such as
myse lf. Is your intent to build another Beaver Creek? Constnrct a cement city in the mountains?
I rust fiat good judgment and a true sense to preserve the value of Vail Village will overcome a
purely greedy and irresponsible decision.
Youn tuty,
Kinney L. Johnson
CC: Village Inn Plaza Condominium Association
Easr Vrrracn HoivlnowNERS AssocurroN. INc.
Directors
Officers: Prcsidcnt - Bob Galvin Sccrctary - Cretta Parks Treasurer - Pahick Cramrn
ludith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Eilie Caulkins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
From:
Date:
RE:
Mayor Rob Ford and Town Council Members
Planning and Environmenla I Commission
Jim Lamon! Executive Director
January 7,1998
Special Development District 6 - Prado Amendment
Public Accommodafion Zone Diskict - Faessler Arnendments
The Homeowners Association obiects to the proposed Waldir hado Amendmenr to Vail Villase
Irur Speciat Development Districf 5 (SDD6) and to de Jbirannes Faessler Amendments to the Public .{c-
commodations Zone Distict On the basis of tlre following factors the Association recommends denial of
both proposals as currently proposed. There are merits conitained within each proposal. However. the cu-
mulative scope of fte proposals suggests that a comprehensive master plannins prbcess should be undertak-
en to amend the Vail Villige MasteiPlan in order to substantiate he c6ncepts-uirderlvine trese proposal
wid:in the broader context of Vail Village and fie economic needs of the community. f[e cominunity's
long held vision of accommodating appropriate and timely development within tre iontext of conroll-ed
master planned grorvtr and the established characler of tr-e communitl/s neighborhoods should continue.
I. Special Development District 6 - Prado Amendment:
l. The Prado amendment significantly exceeds the requirements of lhe existing SDD6 that its ap-
proval would be considered a breacfi-of faith
-on
the part of tre Town of Vail to fulfill fte ierms of zonihp
agreements it adopted, subsequent to negotiation with propertv o*ners. for the Vail Village Inn and Vail
Gatgw.ay s_itgs. Thesg.zoning-agreemenli and standardi w'erebased upon detailed plannin-e and zoning
analysis of dre site, adjacent sites, fte surrounding neighborhood and Vail Viilaee in senerlt. The Ari'end-
ment causes a degree of departure *rat does not infoin to fie requirements oftre Vail Vill8ee Master
Plan or follow trre requirements to amend the master plan. In order to arnend tre Vail Village l4aster Plan
a, comprehensive revibw of conditions, opportunities,'and consequences is required for the sitq adjacent
sites, the surrounding neighborhood and V-ail Villaee in order to deterruine tre impacts and compatibilitv
of he Prado proposalupoi *re established charactei of 6e surrounding neighborh6od and Vaii Viltug". -
2. The bullc, mass, height and selbacks of tre proposed stucture is incompatible and inconsistent
witt.the surrounding neighborhood. Certain functional aspects of the proposal, subh as taffic flow, air
quality and pedesaian routes will cause the potential for ohgoing dysflrnitional and detimental activities
lo occur on or adjacent to the site. The current proposal shoutd & reduced in order to overcome these and
other detrimental effects upon adjacent properties, dre surrounding neighborhood and Vail Village.
. 3. The degree of ecorromic benefrt is prejudiced towards the Prado Arneridment at the expense of
prior property owrers and all adjace-nt prgpqlty own€rs. These property owrers have been or are-subject to
more onerous requirernents enforced by ttie Torvn of Vail fian *ould b-e Prado. If aoproved &e resrilt will
be a grant of special privilege that creaies a windfall economic benefit trat will accrud solely to the gain of
the Town of Vail tlrough increased tax revenues and the current property owner through inireased d'ensity
and buildins size.
U. iublic Accommodation Zone District - Faessler Amendments
1. In established residential neiehborhoods where fte Public Accommodation Zone Diskict occurs
fre proposal will cause radical changes-in tbe characterofftiese residential neishborhoods. The degree of
the increase in bulk, mass and uses wouid aggnvate existing noxious conditions and fierefore would be
dekimental to these established residential neighbo*oods ai'A Val Village in general.
Post Oflice Box 238 Vail, Colorado t1658
Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAx: (9?0)
827_5E56
o
EVHA/TOV - SDD6 and Public Accommodltions Zone Disfrict Amendments lnt:.ggg
.. 2- The proposal creates the opporfunity to concentate an aggregation of commercial sDace on sites
adjacent to the main entrance t9 Vajl The scope of tris opportunityluggests that a comprehedsive masterplanning proce^g should be undertaken to amerid the Vail Viltage tvtust&'ptao in ora"i-io'pio;il;iliJ;""to the,scope of development being proposed. The Vail Village-Master Plan was adopted in 1SSO ;nC ls
consroereo a comprehen$ve tong range master plan.
_ _ l. .The proposal to grant increased exterior rebil uses should continue to be limited to the interiorof a building or to buildings tut front established pedestrian precincts or have ample required setbacksfiom roadwivs.
4 ; plopglal in deregulating lhe amount of commercial space is inconsistent witr tre purpose
and intent of fre Public Accommodations Zone Dishict and as well, the proposal denies the sum" orii-ilurteatnent to all similar types of lodging facilities and d'rerefore appears tb create a grant of special
privilege.
5. There are aspects of the Public Accommodations Zone Disbict development standards frat are
in need of reform in order to encourage the development of short term accommodations and affordable
housing. However, the degree of change advocate'd in the Faessler Amendrnents are far reaching and may
nave unrnrenoed consequences.
III. Cumulative Effects:
. I The.proposals appears to reinforce and aggravate.*istitg infi'astucfural problems in Vail Vil-lage. At a muumum, any proposal to increase the density, size or uses on anv site must include resuire-
ments to absorb, on lhe site, a portion of surrounding nei-ghborhood and Vail Villaee infrastructtxal needs.
For example,.a pressing_intrasFuctural ploblqn in Vail Village is &e need for disp-ened off-steet loading
and delivery facilities. Loading and delivery facilities should'to be incorporated into new developments
lhat serve.on-site, neighborhood and Vail Village needs. As well. tre hoirsing of employees gendrated by
nerv oeveropments snoutc De requred.
-2. Ifnot prop.erly master planned, fte aggregate impact from increases in commercial square foot-
age and tme share untb may dilute the value of existing businesses and rrooerties with {re latent affect of
reducing Are overall economic healfi of fie community: Furfier, it would b'e useful to know the number of
new hotel rooms that are required to offset losses in re-cent years in the rental of condominium units and
from the migration of local ionsumers down valley. Additibnalv', efforts should be undertaken to reform
tax codes and sales tax rates so as to sfimulate the condominiurn-renhl market or to entice businesses to en-
courage customers to pay their fair share of sales tax.
o
IEI\ I 6I ;AI I UfiNE.Itr d-UU ; II;I'U i U /Ut /trl /bD-t
JO|{N W_ OUNN
ARTHIJR A. AEFLA}IAL4 JR.
OIANE H€RIAN XAURIELTO
CJTRRI( A. ITENOON
SPECtA! COUilSE!:
JERRY W! HAI|HA}I
L^w OFFrcE5
DuHN, Aepuaruar-p & MauRreluo, P.C.
A tiOtEUOra r aartoi tr6t
WFSTSTaF BrNx Bu rlot xc
rog Sourx FnoxtareiE RoAo WESI
sut?E s6o
Vatr, COlonaoo atesz
January 8, 1999
Ceorge Ruther, Scnior Plarncr
'Iown of Vail
75 South f rcntagc Road
Vail Co
VIA FACSIMTLE4T9-2452
Re: Vail Plru* flotel Project
Denr Oeorge:
Chuck l.ipcon tclls nrc thd a copy of my lctrcr to thc Planning rmd Enviroruncntal'
Comrnission, datcd Junc 2, 1998' is not in the filc in connostion with the above mattsr- A copy
ol'it therclbre lbllows, and I ask that it, together with this letter, be put in the lile.
It is our interr( [o have the ho',rring beltrre the Plarming anrl Environmontal
Cummission transcribed by a court re,porter" a[ our own expense of course. We will shurs any
trsnscript with you and ask Lhat it be rnads a parl ofthc rccord.
Thanks for your help in cormection with this rnalter-
Yorrrs very tnrly,
DrNN, ABPLANALP & MATJRIELLO, P,C.
ll
I
Joiln W. Dunn
Ljwd:ipsc
cc. Mr. l.ipcon
Mr. Moorhead
i: i ,.-'l:l ':1TEL€PHONE;(9ro) 4?6.. 0300
fAcstxtLE: _ri
lgzor 4r6-4?as
|(ARE l,i, DUNN
CtFIf IEO lEsra
^llr3r^xt
:-.."..o||vru!1.Ig
L-.aw Or'F,cEE
r,rtt-ItzIr-|t,'Q I U2 t Va.'t91
' lf Ul rt
JOHI St Ouittl
,tntxui r ^aFl N^LE JR.
ALLE a C, CHFttrExgE|a
arlr|E L, {aRvara
R. C. STEP}iE Sql|
!llC|l{. CO|lralEl:
JEFFY T$ HANT{^H
TELdFHOt{EI
(t7G'1 /t7€-oJcro
facsr rraLE:
L70, 176-17a6
r^tEx Na. oul|ta
CEltlllEO EO|r. rlt!|!.rY
D u N r.r, AapuaH.ALp :._cg =tE NsE N, P.c.
166 SouTH FFOr|faGE Roro Wesr
Surrs Joo
VAIL. CoLaE^oo ''G!t
Junc 2, 1998
::,' ri'
Plaming rnd Envimnmental Commisiou
Town of Vail
75 South Frontagc Road
Vail CO t1657
Rc: Vail Plaza Hotcl ProFst
Dcar Commisuion Mernbers;
We rcpresml thrce residsrtial unit owners at Vail Gateuny Plaa and hane beed
requcrted by them to providc you with written conuncnt with respcctto the application of
Daynrcr Corporation for a major amandrrcnt to Special Dcveloprncnt Distric #6, the Vsil Village
lnu Sito ('thc Veil Plaza Hotcl Prqicct" or *thc Projcct"). tllvitrg ffiilrs/Ed thc plans sbnittcd
to the Toryn wp wish to sct foTth our concsru with rcspoct to the rdafionstrip oftbeProjcct lo;
thc Vril Villrgp Master Plan.
Frpm our rwiew of the p|rln, it apperrr thet tte p<rrtioos oftbe @iea locred
irrmediarcly adjrc€nt to Vail Grtanay pkzE will bc 60 to 84 fcet above thc f"i!ti!g grldc to the
south of Cr*alay Plrza on Vail Road and ?0 to I00 ftd abovc the qfuting gradc b the cast of
Grtcway Ptaza on Frontage Road. This proporcd hildlng hcigh is rot rn couforrity with tbc
Corrccprual Building Hcight Plan of thc Vdl Villagc Mrstcr Pls4 urhich cst$Ifuhcs a buildiqg
hcight euideline on those psxcds rdjaccrrt to Grtarray Plaza of 34 ($t€ppcd) building storis.
Inrsnuch as the Conceptual Buitding Height Phn defines "building stor;f as nine fccl the
oomcponding buildlng hcight guidclincs ar€ 2? to 36 fcct. Nor is the proposed building hdgE io
conformhy with thc Sub-fuea # | - I Plan t r4gc 37 of thc Master Plaq which rcquires that the
rnaro of buildings'step-up' ft'om pedestrirn scato along Meadow Ddvc to +5 stori€s rlong
Frontagc Road. Consruing the two togethcr, thc rtructurc to thc south of Gateway Pha could
nor by sny interpretadon qcecd four rtorics or 36 fGGt.
Thc proposcd buildiq hcightr brdreProjcct adjaccat to CrafcwayFlrzathcrdore
cxceed mastcr plur limitations fo as rnrch rs 33 to 4E fcet ou Vlil Road aqd 43 to 6,4 frst or
Frontage Road. In other wordl, the phn propocer a hrilding thd is at least twice thc h€igh
timitrtioru of the Vril Viftge Msstcr Plrtt on thorc parcds.
Jtr\ I DI ;AI I I'IIIEI J ; I- O-Ui' ; II.UU ;u ru+ /oa /oor at lu(l IiM*OZ'tf 'u I
Section l2-9A-E ofthc Vail Municipal Code includcs as part ofthe desigrr critcria
for approval of an SDD'sonformity with applicablc eleflrerts ofthe Vail f,o6pplp6ivc p164
Town policier rnd urban design plans" and prwidcs, with rcferencc to those standar&, thd:
"It shall bc thc burdcn of'tlrc applicant to dernonstritc that srbmittal mtcrial and
the propmcd dewlopncot plan conply with cach of the following rtandardr, or
demonstratc thrf onc or morc oftheur is uot applicablc, or that a pncticd $h$ion
oonsisent with tfie pblic intcrcst hs becsr achiev€d: . . ."
Wc rrc rct able to find anything in thc applicrnt'$ $bmitd to suggest thst tle
height limitadons of th6 mrsu plan arc not rpplicable or that thc rpplicant is p,ropocing a aohrtion
to theconflict with thc mrstcr plan which is oonlistcrrt with the publis intoreat Wo cal only
conclude that the applicant is asking that tlrc trdght lirnitations of themasts planbe ignored for
purpose of the application. It is therefors thc purpwe of this lettcr to proride you with a raicw, , r
of Colorado law on thc relationthip bctwccn nrastm plars and mning in6furling in paciarlar thc
type of zone distrid know as the ' planned unit dwelopmurt" CP{JD'') or, as it is loown h Vaq
the rpecial developmmt distria ("SDD"). Brsd upou our rEview ofthal laq it ie our bcliefthit
the rnrster plan rnust be striotly adhered to in the consideration 0f SDD zouitU; ald rrc
respcctfully rrqu€st thil your Gommiision so daerminc rt dte ouhct ofits coniid€mtion of$€
application
The Colorado Supremc Court firrt addresred the effcct ofa master plrn in
Theobald v. tuad of (\nnty Cotnfi'rs. 644 V .U $42 (Colo. I 9E2). In that casc. rhc coufi hcld
that r marter plan ir advisory only and thaq in ordcr for it to hrw a direst cfrct on property
tights, it murt bc furthcr implanentcd through zonhg. mpre*cr, m Beow,r Mfu v. fud
of Cwnty (ioam'n,70gP.2d 928 (Colo. 1985), thc coud held that, whilc arua$crplan &r ar
advreory doqrmcnt is not nece$arily bindirq on thc zoning dircretion of Egorrernm€ilal body, it
ir binding when thc zoning lcgislrtion requirer compli$cswith it.
Moct rcccnrry . ia Ewnl of Cnnty Cmm'n v- Catb. Wl P.idl339 (Colo.
1996), our suprcmc court wrs faccd with a subdivision applicdion which confuncd with
applioable zonins but nol with the county mutcr plao, wlrich had bccn sdopted as a "guidditd'
by tb flrbdivision re4rtrrtiors. Over tws disscotsi the court hdd tbst the cormty could Gufuce
thc mrscr plan compliancc provision lcgiCrtively adopted rs part of the subdivisioUqubdonr.
Takcn togAhcr. lhosc cases tdl ur that, to thc extmt thst zoniry is ircuristat with tb nrstcr
plan tlre rruster pLn will prevail, providcd compliancc with it is rcquired by sonc reguldion. '
Wc rccognizc $at thc Town has grcat nc*ibility in thc ancndnmt of sposial
dcvelop'rrrcnt di*riot zoning nnd that a purporc of an SDD zonc disilris{ is to oncouragc fltldbility
and ocativity in thc development ofland in ordcr to promotc its mort appropriatc use. We also
recogrizc that our losal distric{ court har uflrcld the Tou,'n corurcil's adoption of SDD zoning
ovcr t chdlenge brsed upon the argumcrnt thrt thc adoption of it corutituted *spot zodngl in
contravention of the Town's mrster plrn. Howwcr, $rc Nrc not atguitrg thal thc prcscd
applicalion violstes objectivcs or policics of tlr master phtt which uc aspirationel in mhrc
Rather, we rre rrguing thrt no zone dbttist withia lhe to*u rnay violda I vtry spccific higtt
.iil+ trt'.-. . 8r
. .: :.r.,.
'
SEM BY:ATTORNEYS ; 1- 8-gg ; 11:01 ;8?0474176F,
timit*ion impod by rhc master ptr4 &€n thc mrster phn'r incorporrtion i'to the Town'r .
mning including SDD zoniag
It should also bc rrfltioncd thrt, so Ar Es wc arc awue, tbere hrs nol bcen dirtfu;t'
Of coursc. lhe Town's nn$cr planr meybc amcndcd, but that procesr sbould ottly
bc initiatcd by thc Town council. hrsuant to g 3t-27-207, C-R-S.. *catrcfirl rnd conprchauive
sul€ys arrd studica of prcseirt condilions rnd funre grouilh' rre required. Ilitidioo ofthst
proces$i we beliarc, ought mt be motivatcd bry r singlc epplication.
It is our understamding that the rpplicant belierrcstlnt the cconomic bcocfit ofib
project to the oommunity, including hotel accorsuodatfuru md coofereocc Wac€, qut$€ig[ tho
of mlster plan compliancc. lo lhlt connEdio& i3 i$ wEIl to bear in nind the pupos€$
ofthc Towrt's zortirtg rcgulatioru as tlry ar€ sct fttrth h $ l2-l-2, Vail Muoioipal Codc:
'thcsc rcgulations arc cnactcd forthc purpose of pomotiug tho hcsltb lafcfy,
morols, urd gcneral wclhre of the Tonq and to pronotethe coordinced rnd
harmonioru dcvclopmcnt of thc Town in a mrnncr tbd will coucery€ sd cobre
its nanrral cnvirorunent and its c*ablirhod chrractcr u e rgdt and ruridsnt'rl
commrnity of high qurlity."
97a4752452t# 5/ 6
,,g,'i;4r. rf,:
court revicw of r rezoning in this county d'llrr,, rfu Cm&r decidor hior to thrt dcsitio!, it
might have becn rrgued thu ot SDD zonc disfict, bccEus€it cgablirhcs spcdd rulEforthrt
zmc dirticL may ovenidc mascr plan rcquircrnccns. tloutcver, nCm&r ths curt afrrned , -
krimcr County'r dcnid of an rpplication frr a PI.JD ruMivislln brs€d upon tbe srbdivirim'r
creation of dcruity in confliu rrith thc county rrrster plaC weir though (rs the coun emphasized)l
the proposed usc of thc land wes in compliance with thc cotrry's zoning resolution It must
thcrcfore bc comluded that, if the entircty of tlre Larimer County zoniug rcsohrtim could not , ,
baw lhc cficcl of oveniding thc county nrstcr phq PUD or SDD zooing cartd aon hnw ttu -
eftst.
SENT BY:ATTORNEYS ; 1- 8-99 ; 11:01 ;8704?64765.8704782452;# 6/ 6
That purpo*, wc suggesl is imsaded to prescwe the charaster of tbc towa and rct to p,rooote .economic deraloprrcnt.
Youn vcrytruly,
JWD:ipse
cc. Mr. Lipcon
Mr. Johnston
i,
Jan-08-0e 03:0tp FrorF0X l|Oilil f CAERilI 2r?70s023r r-17? P 02
ECb|.^!A r. FG|r
Joirr F rgnaaa
fiEEll|t& .q gaFEn.rl
^..DaOa.V E, 95vt€
fl5rElB L TEF!.|Enc
naP EL ^ Ci.t*ai.^
^rAi F Jo|.ar5Cnt
ireFarir F Jl!rna?€'l|
|(^t-!tai F, il.ko^'i
FloE:ti (: it.iGcb.e
CDsiO C daF-€r rtR
CrrFTc|iD a Fa?.!*€rFF !,Fl
ct r€TqFt|r 'r Eltt €rrF
EIXr.T|OC r. TAEtcl
Ot co{ri5E!
LataE|- elil€vra ir
FOX HORAN & CAMETTINI LLP
c)NE €Ro^DwA'
NEw tORx. NEW Yc)t( tOOOrr
Jaauary 8, 1999
Dear Mr, Ruther:
IIe repxesenE KnighE8bridge Coqporaeion, owner of gnic No.the Vail Gatehray Condoml-aium. -
This is_t,o express our client,s adamanc oplrosiCion to Eheproposed vail plaea Horef, projeer. which ii decrineucal roTown of vail and contrary to r,be Vaj-l Village Masrer plan.
The proposal should be rejecced ouc of hand-
Vi-a Fax
l,{r. ceorge Ruther
Town of Vail
MFJ:lc
t-7300':
"
TgLEFRcrxE.
TETECOPTEnE-
2aE
che
-Office of the Tbwn Attorney
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
97 0-47 9-2 I 07/Fax 97 0-47 9-2 I 5 7
September 14,2000
DELIVERED VIA FAX
J. Scott Lasater
Lasater & Associates. P.C.
8122 South Park Lane
Littleton, CO 80120
Randall M. Livingston
Bailey & Peterson, P.C.
1 660 Lincoln Street #3175
Denver, CO 80264
Re: Dates of Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission and Design
Review Board considerations of the Vail Plaza Hotel
Gentlemen:
Attached you will find separate lists outlining the dates of hearings on the consideration
of the Vail Plaza Hotel before the Vail Town Council, the Vail Design Review Board and
the Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. Each of these hearings is believed
to be recorded, and we will be producing the transcripts of those hearings.
After each Design Review Board and PEC consideration any action taken or the results
of such hearings is reported to the Vail Town Council at its next scheduled meeting.
That would have been the following Tuesday, excluding any Sth Tuesday of the month
when there are no Town Councilmeetings.
On April 4, 2000, the Town Council held a public hearing on a related matter to
determine whether there was a violation of the Town Charter because of Greg Moffet's
interest in Tiga Advertising. That hearing was held due to the complaint of Charles
Lipcon alleging a conflict of interest.
{g u"nuoru"*
It ie my understanding that this completes all the infonnation you need to meet the
requirernents of the disclosure. Please feelftee to contac{ me with any questions or
mmments.
Very truly yours,
R. Thollee Moorhead
Town Attomey
Worksessions
l-27-99 WS
3-9-99 WS
12-7-99 WS
12-l+99 WS
12-21-99 WS
VAIL VILI,AGE PLAZA HOTEL
Town CouncilMeetings &
Worksessions
TC Meetings
10-20-98 TC I'r meeting
r-r8-99 TC
2-16-99TC
4-20-99TC
I l-2-99 TC
I l-16-99 TC
t2-7-99TC
r2-2t-99TC
l-400Tc
l-t8-00 Tc
2-r5-00 Tc
3-7-00 TC
4-4-00 TC
4-18-00 Tc
5-2-00 TC
8-l-00 Tc
I
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
6/8/98
#9 request work session for amendment to SDD #6
tabled toBl22l9f3
6n?l98
#4 request work session for amendement to SDD #6
no vote memo attached re: description of request
10t26/98
#6 request work session for amendment to SDD #6
tabled to 11/23198
1A14198
#4 final review of amendment to SDD #6
tabled to 1/11/99
1t11t99
#5 request for final review of amendment to SDD #6
approved with 10 conditions
4/1',99
#10 request for final review of amendment to SDD #6
withdrawn
9t27t99
#4 work session re: redevelopment within SDD #6
no vote
10/11/99
#1 work session re: redevelopment within SDD *6
no vote
10/25/99
#2 request for final revienr
no vote
11/8/99
#4 request for final review
tabled to 12/13199
,
11t22t99
#5 request forvtork session
tabled to 1?13199
1A1Ugg
#2 request forfinal review
approved with 21 condilions
2t28t0o
#2 request forfinal revieur
appruved with major amendment recommendation to the council
t
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
10/6/99
#13 conceptual novote
10P0/99
#8 conceptual novote
11/3/99
#12 tabled
11t17t99
#8 conceptual novote
1211199
#5 vote 34 recommendation of approval with conditions
azoo
#7 tabled to2l16l0O
a16too
#9 tabled to 3/1/00
3/1/00
#11 tabled to 3/15/00
o REPORT OF EXPERT WITNESS
John W. Dunn, Esq.
Duuu & Abplaaalp, P.C
108 Soutb Frontage Road Suirc 300 vail CO gld57
l- I an an aftomey licen-sed to practice hw in the srare of Colorado, having beenadmined to l]le bar rn 1964._ For rhe pa$ 35 years, my pracdce has ernphasized real estate andland use issues, and a significant pan of my irme iras bcea devored to rire represeoranon ofgovernmcaral gndiics' as lvell as psrsons having business before goveminenal bodies. I haverryresented Lalce County, dre Cit-v of Leadvilie, rhE Towas of Buina Visra, Vail, .tvon, RedClif[ Mionrrn ani Dilloo and several special districrs. From 1980 ro t998 I was TownntrorncyofrheTownof Avon- FromlgTr to ig93 IwascountyAttorrreyof Larcecounty_ I;;;;;'presideru of rhc Colorado 9*ty Ailortreys' Association and a jasr Cnair of fte MuoicipjAnorfleys' Section of the Colorado Mr.rnicipal League-
2' At rhe requcst of Cbarles R Lipcoa and in rtie capaciry of a.n cxpen wimess, Ihave reviewed files of rhE'lbwn of Vail relating io the Town's:"ppro.rjof *re Vail plazaHorelbyordinanccNo. i,s{es^of_?-000,adopredJanuary Ig,2000,r.rdo.dio*.u}io.4,seriesof
2000' adopted May 2,2000- I fi.rrtber have reviewed ordinances of rhc iown of Vail relating ro
lhe Vai] Village I"r/V+ ptaza Horel sire , rbe MuniciFal Code of rUe Towa of Vail, Jre V ailTowa Charter ar:d the Vail village lvlasrcr Plan. I lrave also *"c" ;;dry
"i the publisher of rhevail Trail aad have obrainca$rn him cogies of ordimces rltos. I andi. series of 2000,publisbed n The Yail frail- I also have r&iewed rhe expert *i,n"r, ,.port of Roben L. Arnoldof Robert L. ArnoldArchirccr, p.C.
3 ' Based upon my examinarion of the foregoiag aod my knowiedge of che law ofzoaing and plann-eg, I bave rcached rhe folorving couclus-ions-:.
u' ftr.1oT failed to compry wirh rhe nodce requiremen* of colorado stanre,the Tows''s Muaicipal code and the coosrirutiocal re3ug9qr.la oraue piocess in rhe adoptio' ofordinances Nos' i and AJeries of 2000, approviug the Vai] pluz.tHoiei as a major amendmenr
lo.feelia Der.elopmem Distlict No. e . T1rc foilure of ihe Town in rhar regeO consisred of rhefollowing:
i. Secriou r2-3-6(Cx2), vair Munic,par c-ode, r:quires rhar norrce of hearing bythe Plann:ng and Environrnentar comm.i.ssion (.?EC')
"f ;; p;;;;r-;j;endmenr ro a sgeciardevelopment crstriet t1 yire{ o.a jaceni piop.ry o*rr.o and rhar, rvhc: rhe adjaceu proparyts a condominiun proje-r, aocice 'Tnay" be u:-ailedro n. m*"gtng .g.oi o, ,r," condominiumassociation' The rowa did causc notice to be mar'led ro. rhe manag:ng agenr of rhe adjac.-nt vailGateway Plaea con'domirium io corureci;."t,I't the pEC's rl.rriig--in ii. ordinacce lareradopted by ure Torvg councii as ordinsrce No. r., series of 2000, J" l*".cr i g, 2000.\ *:::_.:Jl_.- o$*:*"c was an incorrecr, our-oGdare address, anci rhe nor:ce \uas ror receivedoy lhc olvners ' The Town had been adviscd of rhc facr rhar orvncrs *o= ,.,o, receiving nodces ayeer before in' connecrion wiih an earhc, applicarion. The Tor.un rrevenhelsss made no effon rocause nodce Io bt seEt io a correcr address or ro ildividual o*";; in;;;.ecrioo rvirh rhe pEC.;hearir:g on that ordinance. t con.tuoe ,irui unct *rore circ:rnsianccs, ce maied norice lailed ro
z- 5-Q1i 1Z.(JzPM;
\iur" u. '\tU i *. [64za,.0iJ e "rj t&^o"W .Cuot-.*
;3O3 937 OO9 7
r-orr r uarvo
\ktu
I >u.
40:'1,'
'.r.rulr*
ryof.'$ltV*'<, /l"\t
O ono
'.,rq?/r('- AV-\,Ptoh^s ^ tni2r- s0"O h- b"uQ -_--
; 3O3 937 OOST
May 2 ordinance d.id not cr:re rhe due process deliciencies associared "ith rh; January l g
ordinancc.
satisfy tfoq consiiturional requiremenrs of due process, rirar norice be ..reasonably calculated"rlrder sll circumstances' to apprise intelesied iarces ofrhc pendenry oit l"rioo aod afford
_{1n_g-opomrniV ro presenr their objecions :, tu{ullane i. C*rit i*ii Trust Co.,339u.s,306,ll5 (1950)
ii- The Town staff riid matr(e an effon to correcr rhe omission descnbed above iaconneclion with the PEC's hearing on ordinance No. 4, Series or zooo, aaopied by &e Towacouncil on May 2, 2000. Howevcr, rhe purpose of rhar ordinanc. ;;;t;; provide on-siteemployee housing ia compliance "rith condirions iraposed by rhe Council on January l g; ir isciear in rhe record that the decision ro approve rhe Vail Ptaza Hotet * t"Uutla *as made qn
{f:y -I1.
and no1.1c N1uy ?- r ncrcfoii conclude rhar rhe efforts made in connecrion with the
* 2/ 4
o
4' Because thc Torvn failed to corr.ply rvith rbe nodce requir*nen1, of coioradostanrte' :he Town's Municipal code and the constiiuiional requirennents ior due process, rherown council lacked jurisdicdon to consider ur" o.oio*.., adopreci by i.r, causing them to bevotd' fIo,v Dev.. Inc. v. Board_of Co"rty coi-ir.'i40-coro. ss, :+2
-i.zJ iill, ltjj6 (r959)l
*::rj-:_91l of Centrat,!,ezp2d+iz,'+iifc"i". ooo. lee'). rhefactiharanyowncrorhisor ner r3p:esenra;ive oarricipated in some of the proceedlngs does nor relievc rhe Towr:. fromstricl conrl.iance .rirh noilce requrcmenrs- ,[al at ,l_r g.
iii' At this rime, I am unable to locate any aotice of Town Couucil's .ooria"rall-iofOrdinancel.io, I,Serresof2000;bcforeirsadoprionouJanuar_v Ig,2000. Th*";;;;;;la nodcc in $e '[own's ordinance file, where such copies ordinariivar" t.pi *a the publishet of fThe vail rrail is rrne[]s J6 rocare any cogy in ,be lewspaper', *o-.gu. ";;;u prxenr dare. Thefonly norice of the Town Council's considerarion of ordinance 1".7, !..i* orzooo, before irs tadoptioa on lvlay 2' 20o0,.was rhe usual nodce of publicuioa or aoy oidi;;;. being considered If9r finaladoption required bv secrion +-r0, vaii ri*n chaner, *rtirn *t.. ,r* o'"ui"irJ--' Ielevca days ic advance of considcradon ofir on final reading. sor." ii,;+, Gffiui;i;d ICode, establishes a requirement of publication and mailing.Jrno,i..-of u orooor.o amendmenr Ififtcar days in acivanci of rbe heariog. rnar secrioi,r r-f,iguo* .; ;;;"t;.i* rt applies to Iheariags before &e Town councir, q._"9tlce rr.visions arhlde onty . ,rr"iic although orher Ipans of rbar secrion refer ro.borh the pEc aaa'rrre council. IJowcvcr, q iz-1-o6a; v"u IMunicioal codq srarcs rhar ''whec rcguired by srarure or by rhjs Titre, il;;g, before rhe tPlanning and Environmentar cornmisrion *d tir. io*a cl$ncil shal be .oocu.r.I'i""'=e<
'ccord'icc wrtu rrrep,oviJoil;*.rH';;T" il,F@;$Xiil. ,"flff ,T*m
i:::j,t:::n]1lr.:::t::,0. grveu of &eii."r,iJp,"., sr any heanns on amendmenrs rozoning reg::tarions before the governiasuoay orfi:mil;;iil::.:i;#ffiffi,ryj'f"H*.a u$31-l-!01(6),c.R.s.,soasroincludelome-rulernuniciparities. whireVairasahome-n:icmuaicipaliry rray havc *re pow6 r9.ad9'r conrar,v regrlirions,'.ir. ,ufui."-enr of g r2-l-6(4)of che Code makes sale satute appticauie. i rireiefore coacluclc, on rhi basis of borb g l2-3-6 of
n'r"? ff .'i:ig#.tti ffi :; :l'Jrffi; ;;; ;: p u b i is he c auti mal ea n ori c e wa s re q uired,
;303 a37 0097 t, 3/ 4
r-0 r {r4l!r t--u:3
o 5' The Town Corurcil further exceeded irs jurisdiction and rhe lirni131i6n5 6f 1ftgVail lvfr:dcipai code in rhar rhe prans approved by ir for t[. v"iipr"." [#r exceed rheqnximum heighr r.irnirarions of rire vaiivitiage lit"sro er.+
" f"rt or-tu"-io*o,"cocprchcnsive Plan. According ro Mr. .crnoid's repon, rhc uoirarng ir!*erauy 77 feet inhei$rt rmd ltas a ro*'e lv'hich is approxinutcly 99 frcr ia heighl itit piopir.a buildi'g hergbrk q* conformitv wirh. tfe concbtuat Buiiaing Plan oithl v.iivurlg;Master plan, whichestablishes aluilding hcighr-guidehre oo rhose p-arcets adjaceor ro caci"y plaza of r-+GPt-{ building siories, which, according ro !ulr. Araold should resr:lr ; a 5u11a;,''g berween 45aod 50 feet in heighr' giveathe CouccpnraiBuilding Heighr pran a.nriii.n or .-uuiliciug srory"as niac feet' As nored by vt. .tmold,ihc agproved-build-tlg ircighr ioirh" Irorel is a sixtyperccnr increase qver whar is perm ineci under the Masrer plan.
secrion 12.-9A-s(D), vaii Mruricipar_!9de, rcrurres rhar aay speciar developmenrdisrict conform with applicable elernents olthe Vail Comprebensive plur. That section isconsisreru wirh 5 24'67-lo4(lxD, c.Rs-, apart or-rhc prr,to"o uo,r p.i"tpro* Act of 1972,whicL requaes that any plannfr y, a*etofu"ur (rhc definirlon oi"rt i.u il.pr.nen6 a specialdeveloprnctt disrrict) bc aqproved onty upon a frnding lxar rhc ptan is ia general conformity withaoy masrer plao or comprehensive plan of rhe aporoviig **;.;pa;.y--iJ" o k" toiri
"J iorr]Com'rt v. Conder, g2z p.zd l l:?9 (Colo. f 99e, The planned Unir Developmcnr Act of l9?2,gursuanl rg ! 24-67-r07(r),.9,9s- is ap-olicabre ro home-rule ;;6"il; unbss ir issuperseded by cbarter or ordinance *uit"nerlt. The Town oi vail has'nor raken any accion rosupeFode rhe Aq, an4 as.I bave nored abovg rhe To."rr', o,"r.o.,ilg;;;,;rio". are consisrentwirh the Acc I concrude rhal rrrl approved prans fo, ,t. v";t pt*. rrir-.-u-ro oc exlenr rhar rheypermir the height of rhehoret to biiixryp**,o o*ss of rv.har is peonined by the vailviuage Masrer praq ate ncr in generai'"6Gr"iry *ith, and cenainly do aot compry withn rheMasrsr Ple", causing the approvat of them ro be LroalO-
6. The comp.ensadon ro be paiC for my repon and ies*lrony is bascd upon acharge of 5225 per hour- Publicadocs b]r; ;ril rhe pasr ien years are as follows:
, Wesr Publishing Corapany, 1997.
"CBA Presideat's Message to Me,"be*,,, The Cglorado Larwer, Juiy, I993through Jwre, 1994.
Gereral Ed,itor. Cotorad",!TIi*
lrlTS.and Colorado Reai Esrare Fonrs,puolis;:ed.'oy l.Q*iGop.rutirfNilhi;g=
My tcsrirnony as an expert wirness within ibe past four yeers is as
Cese no. 95 CV 180, Eagie Couary Disrricr Cor.rn,
Cese co. 94 CV 271, Eagle Counr_v Disrricr Courr.
fo llow's:
Curler.v Trading v. Rudy.
Anirervs v. Daniel v. Heindel
i 1z:(l:lPMi ; 3O3 637 OOST 4,/
o DATED Jaouary lZ,2001.
'' t ,j CQ,:;,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 00-D-779
CHARLES R. LIPCON,
Plaintiff,
TOWN OF VAIL, amunicipal corporation;
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL;and
DAYMER CORPORATION N.V.,
a Netherlands Antilles comoration
Defendants.
DECLARATION OF GEORGE RUTHER
George submits the following declaration:
l. I am employed by the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Community
Planning and Development Department. I am the Chief of Planning on the Town's staff.
I had primary responsibility lbr overseeing the applications of Daymer Corporation, N.V.
to amend Special Development District #6 inthe Town of Vail in 1999 and 2000.
2. Both the Town's Planning and Environmental Commission and Council
held work sessions in 1999. Work sessions of these bodies are open to the public. Notice
of issues that will be covered during Town Council work sessions is given by posting the
agenda of the meeting at the beginning of the week of the meeting on a bulletin board in
the public hallway in the Town of Vail offrces. Agendas for work session meetings of
the Planning and Environmental Commission on October ll, 1999, October 25, 1999,
and November 9, 1999 were posted on the Town Council Chamber's door on the day of
the work session. Agendas for work session meetings of the Town Council in the
aftemoon and evening of December 21, 1999, were posted before the sessions.
3. Following passage of Ordinance l, Daymer Corporation, N.V.
demonstrated compliance with a condition of the Ordinance regarding employee housing.
As a result, the Town passed a subsequent ordinance, Ordinance 4 (Series of 2000), that
repealed and reenacted Ordinance I. Passage of Ordinance 4 followed the Town's
procedures for a major amendment to a special development district.
4. In order to implement the Town Code's with notice requirements, I
contacted Wes Jensen of Mountainaire Properties, which is the local agent for Stoltz
Brothers Management. Stoltz Brothers Management is the managing agent for the
Gateway Building Condominium Association. I obtained from Mr. Jensen the current
addresses for notice to Stoltz Brothers Managoment. Those addresses were: Gateway
Condominium Association, Keith D. Stoltz, Stoltz Bros. Ltd., 3828 Kennett Pike, Ste
212, Wilmington, DE 19807-2331 and Stoltz Bros. Management, Attn: Wes Jensen, PMB
233- 19000, Avon, CO 81620. Mailed notices of the February 28, 2000, meeting of the
Planning and Environmental Commission regarding Daymer Corporation, N.V.'s
application to amend Special Development District #6 were mailed to those addresses.
5. On April 7, 2000, the Town published notice of the first reading of
Daymer Corporation's proposed amendment of Special Development District #6 before
the Town Council would be held on April 18, 2000. On April 18, 2000, the Town
council continued the second reading to May 2,2000.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
that the foregoing is true and corr€ct.
Executed on lulyf.l 2001.
George Ruther
o
o
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on June 8, 1998, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. ln
consideration of:
A request for a worksession to discuss a major amendment to Special Development District
f t9, Vail Village Inn, to allow for a hotel redevelopment, located at 100 East Meadow Drive, Lots!}!t and O, Block 5D. VailVillage 1st.
-,- \ Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay petersonPlanner: George Ruther
A_leqqest for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Bed and Breakfast operation, located at
1779 Siena Trail/Lot 1 8, Vail Village West Fiting #1 .
Applicant Malin Johnsdotter/ Robert ZeltmanPlanner: Christie Barton
A request for a major amendment to Special Development District #22, Grand Traverse, and a
request for a major subdivision for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision
Filing #1.
Applicant: Patrick DauphinaisPlanner: George Ruther
A request for a side setback variance, to allow for the construction of a garage, located at 813
Potato Patch Drive/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: Liz & Luc Meyer, represented by William PiercePlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for an amendment to a previously approved plan for the Timber Falls Development,
located at 4469 Timber Falls CourVunplatted.
Applicant: RAD Five L.L.C., represented by Greg AmsdenPlanner: Dominc Mauriello
A request for an extension of a conditional use permit for the Lionshead Children's Tent, located
next lo the Lionshead Childrens ski school/Tract D. Vail Lionshead 1st.
A request for a minor subdivision lo amend a building envelope, to allow for the installation of a
gazebo, located at 1315 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 12, Spraddle Creek Estates.
Applicant;
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Vail Associates, represented by David Thorpe
Christie Barton
Nate Accardo, represented by Frilzlen, Pierce, Briner
George Ruther
Dayco Holding Corporation, represented by David Argo of No Name Architects
Dominic Mauriello
A request for additional GRFA, ulilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the construction of a
residential addition, located at 1998 Sunbursl Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd.
. ,/it \"",w- ,i
rr.,lffi
A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for lhe conversion of a
garage to GRFA, and for the expansion of the mechanical room, located at 345 Mill Creek
Circle/Lot 14, Block 1, VailVillage 1sl.
Applicant; Lee M. Bass, represented by Snowden and HopkinsPlanner: George Ruther
' A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the expansion of the q .''enlry, located at 2005 West Gore Creek Drive/Unplatted. i /
Applicant: Tom Thomson, represented byJohn Perkins E
Planner: Christie Barton
A request for a final review of a major amendment to SDD #4, to allow for a fractional fee club
and a change to the approved Development Plan, located at 1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven
Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A.
Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby RobinsonPlanner: George Rulher
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planne/s office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon requesl with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for lhe Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published May 22,1998 in lhe Vail Trail.
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town o6 f,,-,-
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the -j
r
Town of Vail on october 26, 1998, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In f t
consideration of:
A request for a Major SDD Amendment and Conditional Use Permit, to allow for a
"transportation business" within SDD #4, located at 1295 S. Frontage Road/Cascade Village.
Applicant: Thrifty Car Rental, represented by Rudy & AssociatesPlanner: George Ruther
A rezoning and major subdivision for property previously unzoned and owned by the United
States Forest Service and transfened to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land Ownership
Adjustment Agreement lo Primary/Secondary Residential District and Natural Area Preservation
District (NAPD), for property located at Rockledge Road/ Lots 2, 4, 7 ,8A, 94, and 15, Block 7
Vail Village First Filing; Lots 3A and 38, Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vail Village Firsi Filing;
Lot 10A, Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 138 Resubdivision of Lot
13 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; and Govemment Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South,
Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian.
Applicant Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A rezoning and major subdivision for property previously unzoned end owned by the United
Slates Forest Service and transfened to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land Ownership
Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District and Natural Area Preservation
Distrist (NAPD), for property located at Ptarmingan Road/ Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, Vail Village
Seventh Filing, and Governrr.'ril Lot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of
the Sixth Principal Meridian.
A.pplicant: Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a front and side setback variance, to allow for a residential addition to an existing
single-family residence, loccforl at 1755 west Gore Creek Drive / Lot 6, Vail Village west #o
Applicant: Daniel and Karen Forey, represented by the Keating PartnershipPlanner: Jeff Hunt
A request for a front setback variance, to allow for the reconstruction of a garage wilhin the front
setback, located at 756 Forest Road / Lot 12, Block 1, Vail \/illage 6'n Filing.
Applicant: Emmet and Toni Stephenson, represented by Kevin EbertPlanner: George Ruther
A request for a site coverage variance f16m Qaarian 4t ^ ' ' ' - 't rhe z:,,,,,o i,-;ulations anrt 3
front setback variance, lo allow for the construction of a new single-family residence with a Type
ll EHU, Iocated at 756 Potato Patch / Lot 4, Block 2, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Wolfgang Berndt, represented by Steven RidenPlanner; Allison Ochs
A request for a worksession to discuss a major amendment to Special Development District
1No. 6, VailVillage Inn, to allow for a hotel redevelopment, located at 100 East Meadow Drive,
.!#t " M and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st.
F$pticant: Daymer corporalion, repfesented by Jay petersonP':inner: George Ruther
A request for review and comments of the proposed Lionshead Master Plan.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner; Lionshead Master Plan Team
The aPplications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planne/s office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published October 9. 1998 in the Vail Trail.
ATTORNEYSATI,AW
- vArL NATIoNAL BANK BLD9' -- ---- iotso,r.iiia-oxrlcn nonp wEsr' sUITE 307
VAIL coLonADO 81667
.tr
o
cateway Condominium Association
c/o StoLtz Bros. ' Ltd'
r'lOO tlarket Street, Suite 3o0
Slilnington, DE L980L
Attn: Keith D. Stoltz
Vail Village Inn PLaza
Condninium Association I & IIc/o Slifer Management
1-43 E. Meadow DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Village Inn Plaza Condorninium Assoc.
Phase III & Vc/o Joseph Staufer
l-00 East Meadow DriveVail, Colorado 8L657
Colorado Department of Transportatron
c,/o Jin Nall
606 S. 9th Street
Grand Junction, co 81501
VAIL COLORADO 8T667
IUO FT'U'IH fI'ONTACE ROAD WEST, SUITE SO7VAIL, COLOnADO 8t6r?
.i^rplne standard
;:_yorrlh Frontage Road Westv€tllr Colorado 6foSz
FirstBank
17.VaiI Roadv€lrIr Colorado 81G57
o
Ylll!, rJtr!\,r6yv e---.
Sonnenalp HoteI62. East Meadow DrivevElrl r Colorado dg1652
Holiday House Condominiums9 Vail RoadVaiI, Colorado 91657
.u.r+, iIiRRn.'IG & PptnnsoN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPONAfl ON
l,,ffiH,H'#*T"".
rO8 SOt.rTH FNOI||:IAGE ROAD WES'T, SUITE 307
VAIL. COLORADO 81657
LPY, HANNII\IG & PETERSON
}orrssroHar."conror.errou
VAIL NATIONAL BANK BLDC,
08 SOUTH FNONTAGE ROAD WEST. SUITE 307
vArL, coLoRADO 81667
Trevina Ltd.
C/o Maxine MiIIer
143 East Meadow Drive, Suite 499AVaiI, Colorado AL657
Crossroads Condominiumc/o Maxine MiLler143 East Meadow Drive,Vail, Colorado 9j,657
Association
suite 499A
o
o ORDINANCE NO.l
SERTES OF 2000
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SPECTAL
DEVELOPMENT D|STRICT NO. 6, VAIL VILLAGE tNN, PHASE lV, TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE VAIL PLAZA HOTEL: AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS lN
REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, In 1976, the VailTown Council adopted Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1976,
establishing Special Development District No. 6, VailVillage Inn; and
WHEREAS, Section 12-9A-10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments to
previously Approved Development Plans for Special Development Districts; and
WHEREAS, Waldir Prado, dba Daymer Corporation, as owner of the Phase lV property,
has submitted an application for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail
Village Inn, Phase lV; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to adopt an Approved Development Plan for
the Vail Village Inn Special Development District, Phase lV to allow for the construetion of the Vail
Plaza Hotel: and
WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the Special Development District is in the
best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Town of
Vail Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the
Planning & Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the major amendment application;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Environmenial Commission has reviewed the prescribed criteria
for a major amendment and has submitted its unanimous recommendation of approval to the Vail
Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have been sent to
the appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the VailTown Council considers it in the best interest of the public health,
safety, and welfare to adopt and re-establish the Approved Development Plan for Special
Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase lV, Vail Plaza Hotel; and
Ordinance 1. Series of 2000
o
Whereas, the approval of the major amendment to Special Development District No. 6; Vail
Village Inn, Phase lV, Vail Plaza Hotel and the development standards in regard thereto shall not
establish precedence or entitlements elsewhere within the Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Puroose of the Ordinance
The purpose of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2000, is to adopt an Approved Development Plan for
Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase lV, Vail Plaza Hotel. The Approved
Development Plans for Phases l, lll & V remain approved and unchanged for the development of
Special Development District No. 6 within the Town of Vail, unless they have otherwise expired.
Only the Approved Development Plan for Phase lV, the Vail Plaza Hotel is hereby amended and
adopted.
Section 2. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled. Plannino Gommission Reoort
The approval procedures described in Section 12-94 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled,
and the Vail Town Council has received the recommendation of the Planning & Environmental
Commission for a major amendment to the Approved Development Plan for Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase lV, Vail Plaza Hotel. Requests for amendments to the
Approved Development Plan shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 12-9A of the Vail
MunicipalCode.
Sec'tion 3. Special Development District No. 6
The Special Development District and the Major Amendment to the Approved Development Plan
for Phase lV are established to assure comprehensive development and use of the area in a
manner that would be harmonious with the general character of the Town, provide adequate open
space and recreation amenities, and promote the goals, objectives and policies of the Town of Vail
Comprehensive Plan. Special Development District No. 6 is regarded as being complementary to
the Town of Vail by the Vail Town Council and the Planning & Environmental Commission, and has
been established since there are significant aspects of the Special Development Distrist that
cannot be satisfied through the imposition of the standard Public Accommodation zone district
requirements.
Section 4. Development Standards - Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn,
Phase lV, Vail Plaza Hotel
ordinance 1 . Series of 2000
Development Plan-
The Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase lV,
Vail Plaza Hotel shall include the following plans and materials prepared bv Zehren and
Associates. lnc., dated November 23, 1999 and stamped approved by the Town of Vail, dated
January 18,2000:
A. Site lllustrative Plan
B. Site Vignettes Key Plan (noted"forillustntion purposes ong)
C. Site Vignettes
D. Site Plan (revised)
E. Level Minus Two
F. Level Minus One
G. Level Zero
H. Level One
l. Level Two
J. Level Three
K. Level Four
L. Level Five
M. LevelSix
N. Roof Plan
O. Roof Plan (Mechanical Equipment)
P. Street Sections (Vail Road Elevation/North Frontage Road Elevation)
O. Plaza Sections (South Plaza Elevation/East Plaza Elevation)
R. Building A Elevations
S. Building A Sections
T. Building B Elevations
U. Building B Sections
V. Building Height Plan 1 (Absolute Heights/lnterpolated Contours)
W. Building Height Plan 2 (Maximum Height Above Grade/lnterpolated
Contours)
X. PoolStudy(PoolSections)
Y. Vail Road Setback Study
Ordinance 1 , Series of 2000
Z. Loading and Delivery plan
AA. Street Entry Studies (Vail Road/South Frontage Road)
BB. Sun Study
CC. Landscape lmprovements Plan
DD. Off-site lmprovements Plan
Permitted Uses-
The permitted uses in Phase lV of Special Development District No. 6 shall be as set forth in the
development plans referenced in Section 4 of this ordinance.
Gonditional Uses-
Conditional uses for Phase lV shall be set forth in Section '12-7A-3 of the Town of Vail Zoning
Regulations. All conditional uses shall be reviewed per the procedures as outlined in Chapter 12-
16 of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations.
O Density- llnits per Acre - Dwetling lJnih, Accommodation llnits, & Fractional Fee Club llnifs
The number of units permitted in Phase lV shall not exceed the following:
Dwelling Units - 1
Accommodation Units - 96
Fractional Fee Club Units - 48
Density- Floor Area
The gross residential floor area (GRFA), common area and commercial square footage permitted
for Phase lV shall be as set forth in the Approved Development Plans referenced in Section 4 of
this ordinance.
Setbacks-
Required setbacks for Phase lV shall be as set forth in the Approved Development Plans
referenced in Section 4 of this ordinance. The front setback along Vail Road shall be 20'.
O Height-
The maximum building height for Phase lV shall be as set forth in the Approved Development
Plans referenced in Section 4 of this ordinance. For the purposes of SDD No. 6, Phase lV,
calculations of height, height shall mean the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or
finished grade (whichever is more restrictive), at any given point to the top of .a flat roof, or mansard
roof, or to the highest ridge line of sloping roof unless othenryise specified in Approved
Development Plans.
Ordinance 1 , Series of 2m0
Site Goverage-
The maximum allowable site coverage for Phase lV shall be as set forth in the Approved
Development Plans referenced in Section 4 of this ordinance.
Landscaping-
The minimum landscape area requirement for Phase lV shall be as set forth in the Approved
Development Plans referenced in Section 4 of this ordinance.
Parking and Loading-
The required number of off-street parking spaces and loading/delivery berths for Phase lV shall be
provided as set forth in the Approved Development Plans referenced in Section 4 of this
ordinance. In no instance shall Vail Road or the South Frontage Road be used for loading/delivery
or guest dropotf/pick-up without the priorwritten approval of the Town of Vail. The required
parking spaces shall not be individually sold, transfened, leased, conveyed, rented or restricted to
any person other than a tenant, occupant or user of the building for which the space, spaoes or
area are required to be provided by the Zoning Regulations or ordinances of the Town. The
foregoing language shall not prohibit the temporary use of the parking spaces for events or uses
outside of the building, subject to the approval of the Town of Vail.
Section 5. Approval Aorcements for Special Development District No. 6. Phase lV. Vail
Plaza Hotel
1. That the Developer submits an Employee Housing Plan to the Town of Vail Community
Development, within 30 days of the approval of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2000, for the
review and approval of the Plan by the Vail Town Council and/or reviewing Boards and
Commissions, prior to the issuance of a building permit. At a minimum, the proposed Plan
shall include, but not be limited to, housing altematives, with at least one altemative
showing 38 beds and at least one additional plan showing 19 beds on-site and within the
Special Development District for the consideration of the Town. The required employee
housing units shall be located within the Town of Vail and comply with the Town of Vail
Employee Housing Requirements (Title 12, Chapter 13, of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code). The Developer shall provide deed-restricted housing for a minimum of 38
employees, and said deed-restricted housing shall be made available for occupancy, and
the deed restrictions be recorded at the Office of the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior
to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Vail Plaza Hotel. Nothing
Ordinance I , Series of 2000
contained herein shall obligate the Town to approve such a Plan, nor shall the Developer be
reguired to remove existing proposed uses or densig in order to construct the employee
housing units on site. The Developer agrees, at the determination of the Town of Vail
Community Development Department, to make all necessary applications and proceed
through all required development review processes resulting from the proposed Employee
Housing Plan.
2. That the Developer submits detailed civil engineering drawings of the required off-site
improvements (street lights, drainage, curb and gufter, sidewalks, grading, road
improvements, etc.) as identified on the off-site improvements plan to the Town of Vail
Public Works Department for review and approval, priorto application for a building permit.
3. That the Developer submits a detailed final landscape plan and final architectural elevations
for review and approval of the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to application for a
building permit.
4. The sdd approval time requirements and limitations of Section 12-94-12 shall apply to
Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2000. ln addition, the phasing of the construction of the hotel
shall not be permitted.
5. That the Developer submits the following plans to the Department of Community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application for the
hotel:
a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plant
b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;
c. A Stormwater Management Plan;
d. A Site Dewatering Plan; and
e. A Traffic Control Plan.
O 6. That the Developer receives a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of Type lll
Employee Housing Units in Phase lV of the District, in accordance with Chapter 12-16, prior
to the issuance of a building permit, to provide housing on-site, if the application to amend
Special Development District No. 6, pursuant to Condition of Approval #1 above, is
approved by the Town of Vail.
7. That the Developer submits a complete set of plans to the Colorado Department of
Transportation for review and approval of a revised acoess permit, prior to application for a
Ordinanoe 1 , Se]ies of 2000
O
building permit.
E. That the Developer meets with the Town staff to prepare a memorandum of understanding
outlining the responsibilities and requirements of the required off-site improvements, prior to
second reading of an ordinance approving the major amendment.
9. That the Developer revises the plans to comply with the required 2O-foot along Vail Road
pursuant to the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail. The revised plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
10. That the Developer submits a complete set of plans responding to the design concems
expressed by Greg Hall, Director of Public Works & Transportation, in his memorandum to
George Ruther, dated 12l13/99. The drawings shall be submitted, reviewed and approved
by the Town Engineer, prior to final Design Review Board approval.
11. That the developer records a public pedestrian easement between the hotel and the Phase
lll Condominiums and between the Phase V Building property lines. The easement shall be
prepared by the developer and submifted for review and approval of the Town Attorney.
The easement shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorde/s Office prior to
the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupanry.
12. That the Developer record a deed-restriction, which the Town is a party to, on the Phase lV
property prohibiting the public use of the spa facility in the hotel. Said restriction may be
revoked if the Developer is able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town that
adequate provisions for vehicle parking have been made to accommodate the public use of
the spa. The restriction shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit.
13. That the Developer submits a final exterior building materials list, a typicalwall section and
complete color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board, prior to
making an application for a building permit.
14. That the Developer submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza
Hotel for review and approval of the Design Review Board, prior to the issuancE of a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
15. That the Developer submits a roof-top mechanical equipment plan for review and approval
of the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-top
mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the overall design of the hotel and
Ordinance 1. Serbs of 2000
O
enclosed and screened from public view.
16. That the Developer posts a bond with the Town of Vail to provide financial security for the
125o/o of the total cost of the required off-site public improvements. The bond shall be in
place with the Town prior to the issuance of a building permit.
17. That the Developer installs bollards or similar safety devices at the intersection of the
delivery access driveway and the sidewalk along the South Frontage Road to prevent
conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate
of Occupancy.
18. That the Developer studies and redesigns the entrance on the north side of the hotel across
from the entrance to the Gateway Building to create a more inviting entrance or a design
that redirects pedestrians to another entrance. The final design shall be reviewed and
approved by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit.
O 19. That the Developer coordinate efforts with the owners of the Gateway Building to create a
below ground aocess for loading and delivery to the Gateway from the Vail Plaza Hotel to
resolve potential loading and delivery concems at the Gateway. lf a coordinated effort can
be reached the Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community
Development Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
20. That the Developer revises the proposed floor plans for the Vail Plaza Hotel to provide
treight elevator access to the lowest level of the parking structure. The revised plans shall
be submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and
approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
21. That the developer redesigns the proposed elevator tower to create an architectural feature
atop the tower and revises the proposed building elevations and roof plan prior to final
review of the proposal by the Design Review Board. The Board shall review and approve
the revised design.
22. That the Developer, in cooperation with the Town of Vail Public Works Department design
and construct a left-tum lane on Vail Road and reconfigure the landscape island in the
South Frontage Road median to eliminate left-tums from the loading/delivery. The
construction shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy.
Ordinance 1 , seri6 of 2000
23.That the Developer provides a centralized loadingidelivery facility for the use of all owners
and tenants within Special Development District No. 6. Access or use of the facility shall
not be unduly restricted for Special Development District No. 6. The loading/delivery facility,
including docks, berths, freight elevators, service conidors, etc., may be made available for
public and/or private loading/delivery programs, sanctioned by the Town of Vail, to mitigate
loading/delivery impac{s upon the Vail Village loading/delivery system. The use of the
facility shall only be permifted upon a finding by the Town of Vail and the Developer that
excess capacity exists. The Developer will be compensated by the Town of Vail and/or
others for the common use of the facility. The final determination of the use of the facility
shall be mutually agreed upon by the Developer and the Town of Vail.
That the Developer submits a written letter of approval from adjacent properties whose
property is being encroached upon by certain improvements resulting from the construction
of the hotel, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
That the Developer executes a Developer lmprovement Agreement to cover the completion
of the required off-site improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Section 6.
lf any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 7.
The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided
in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occuned prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other aclion or
proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted.
The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 8.
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
24.
25.
Ordinance I , Series of 2000
O inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. The repealer
shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof,
heretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE lN FULL ON FIRST READING this +tn day of January, 2000, and a public hearing for second
reading of this Ordinance set for the 18rh day of January, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the
Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ludwig Kuz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READTNG AND ORdERED PUBLTSHED this 18fr day of
January,2000. .r
Ludwig Kuz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
Ordinance 1 . Sories of 2000
10
o
o
/'
/\=* /'
).7--_=--_
ri
--_\