HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5B LOT C AND D COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING 1994 COUNCIL PEC AND DRB APPROVALS LEGALt'
1
I
r
ss-|s:- ?
)I
rLs
2
---t
-REs
$li.
rrHHt
9|.F
33Ir
AH
5=
pfr
=.1.T
L7
E!!I
-0,<.
R|-
Esr
5b'
gFl
{il3
ffi
rll
=
,d4lrl
I
rr.
;
(?
(,
t,lrl
\(
:l;
)!F
1rl
lrl'
l:l
U
oo
't/'
r
IFtEl
5r{.tzthsr6.
(J
t_
I
I !'oEhtgYFrl
1
d
\t--9.-
6'
E5
ui
Il--
rL
--+--,9
INI la tu\,
rght5, ara
:
or
e
:(L,l!o
9t:91 ffil'l g6-9t-Jc0z0'd
E
I
!
I:I
I
(
I
ill5
,Hr!
ig
id[
iH$
k
h
B
h
II
tr.
P
r
(
g
s/
.e/
$,/
b
d
u
Hs^I
II
$v,
I
/
$,
!e,
:??.
d
$
&'
!+f tI
$f'E
$ry;E.i:
il
I st$
I
/#A
w
'stgffi
I
I
l8' {r S{$^$;qtsg
' ). sL(''
,d,';t'q
$tpl- \
Ll",l*aog
OL|L7/95 15:30 GWATEI{EY PRATT SCEULTZ ARCH..r'- oo 3)4t 75-161I(30 P. 001
rF YOII 1IAVE ANY
CALI. FOR ABBY.
TEI..ECOPIER ( 303 )
QUESTIONS OR PROBLE}IS
47 6-1612
REGARDING TII15 FAX, PIJEASE
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
NUMBER
9ltp SaUtWz .
CwMrd? Ww*-Wt$-_ \r Jfi-l 'ea ...-- - - -t/)or PAGE$ {INCLUDING CoVERI: :L
-
ot/17 /95 15:30 GWATE}ITY PRATT SCHULTZ ARCE.ao (303 )476-1512lo P. 002
vla'ltp.
EYtEtl9lott,.
Tt'tttFpw
\'i1?Wffi,#,W,Y,
r_ rZx N. pA*,T 1v
r-* PATtfi d-ry 4 ?awo
ffi
l'lll
iltl
titl
I t li-- EXtqTHa qls^L
'1 treodt\
iltl
ll ll tx ro KAtLi 4s'' 6.trhc#
ll ll tfrFrf,,ffi1#,zr{6,b
LEil +?6Tyi, @ LIILEW.. l/.Lt'
COVERED BBIDGE BUILDING
227 1AIDGE STBEET
VAIL, COLOBADO
AX
h"?
l,l7,1b
0L/Lg /95 oB | 46t
I
GWA TIII{EYo PRATT SCHULTZ ARCII.t303)475-1612 P. 001
Docombcr el, 1994
Mikc McGce, Firc Metcholl
Town oJ Vail Firu oepartm€at
Vail, Colol'odo
RE: Gotrnd ldtlgn futdng
227 &l(|gf, su$t
vd, co
Dear Miks:
Thank you for 6ll your carelul attention and repeated offorts to work with tfie Fire ProtGctlon and Alatm
sygt€ms cornractors for the cworgd Baidge BJilding this tall, The following is a request from the
Aichite*, $wners (Eastflest Partnersl, the Design Review Boad, and the Planning Stsft tronl the Town
of Vail regarding the abo.r€ Project, As outlined in the errclosed lgttar from the Departm6nt of
Cornmunity Daneloprnent (ltem 3), final approvat of the Projecr is conditiorral upgn trJrsuing this request'
1. Fequest to lower the height of the existing 6'dry stand pip€ ald 4' boqeter ptp€ to lhe
mirimurn reouirtd bv the Fire Code and vour Department, lt i$ reque$ted this height abov€
thc planter grade be similar to the instatlatiorr directly ocrose tha street vt/hifi b 1G12"- We
nrnnose ro rcdrrca thi prrn€nt height of 27" and 36' above grad€ to match the condirion at
Nick's, The present tocation of rhe 2 pipes is close enough to the street edge as to not auow
:ny significant lendscsing that $ro(rlrl ohncr rc rhe pipns (perennial flowets mlvl.
Furthermore, it woutd be sdpulated that no scrooning b€ allowed to block direct viow.
We respe€ttully $ubmit the above requests in en €flort to satisly all interested pirties. We cncourage any
ond oll questkrns ond cuggestion+.nr
i a ,)j,.-ta
a t-a ta aN.
zHt I I
/f Petcr Oann
EA$TA/VEST PARTNERS, INC,
Sidn€y Schultz
GWATHMEY/PRATT/SCHULTZ ABCI.IITECTS
Enclosurei IUV Lctter (12/115/94!
oLlre 1:5 o8:47 TTIMEYo PRATT SCHULTU ARCE.( 303 )476-1612
OJ
P. 002
,
MWUOFVATT
75 South Fronnge Road
Vail, C<tlomdo 81657
303479-2138/ 47e.2t3e
FAX 30i-479-2.tJ2
December 16, 1994
Deprnnent
Mr. Eric Johnson
Gwathmey Pratl scnu|tr Archltects
1000 south Frontage Roarl wosl
Vail. CO 81657
HE: Covered Bridge Euilding
Dsar Erie
Thank you again for att€nding the December 7, ]994 Design Ftevierv Board-(DHB) meeting-to
rariew'a vanety ot iSStEs reg-uding the Oovorod Btidge BrjiEing' AS you are aware' the DRB
approved the final colons for-he UultOing/ranings. The vote for approvalwas unanimous (5'0).
Tiris approval canied with it the following lour conditions:
1. That tha two entry lights localed adjacent to the lonrer level reHil space be
removed ana tnai ml previouely apiroved "coach lightsn bc installed. The DFIB
dd recognize that the existing lights ware only telrporary, and would be in
pace only until such time as ttre permanenl lights eorrld be deliverod and
installed.
2. That he ADA required lltt, adjacent to BrHge Steet, be modified by adding
wood cladding to the 1ft and 6y painting anl exposed m€lal surfacss the
'Nevaio Red' lo metch the ralling color on lhe building.
4.
That ho dovoloper work with lhe Town of Vail Fire Department.in ord€r to lower
the two stand phes which ere located in the planter at ho southeasl cofnel0f
ttre buildhrg, ailjirco,'t lu Erirlge Str'eet. The DR€ quastioncd whetrer the height
of lnJ rUr[' pbes was actualy determined by the Fke Code? Geneially, the
DRB feh ttrai tire btand pipes ietactctt trum the aosnetc quahty of lhe building
and stronolv recommenitid hat thBy bs towerEd. The DRB has.required that'
sfroufO tneri be some code requirement which would not allor he stand pipes
to be lowered, then the dFlrelnrler of the Covered Bridge Building would need l0
corne back lo tre DRB with an 'adequate' screening plan for lhe stand pape$-
That ltre developer of he covered Bridge Building discuss with he prop9fiy
owner tO Ue SoLn {PBpl Gramsharnmer; t1e ;russiDility ot rumoving the "yellow-
colored stucco', adiacent to the southeast comer ol he Covered Briqe -guilOng, and siUstitute claOOing or stucco paintd to match thE Covered Bridge
Building.
6.tr'T"D+
f--"I**'t$
A ri"*iirlz i,'
0L/L9 /95 08 r 47\GvIArHr'fl PRArr scHULrs ARCH. (30U6-1612 P.003
Mr. Johnron
Decernber 16, 1994
Pagc Two
lf you snouH heve any que$ion3 or commontg r€garding any ot tha above, please teel tree to
contact me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
llrA l'lrlA*
Milto l'lollica
Acting Dircctor ol Community D*dopment
xc: Petet Dann
\,!
*
$
\
R
\
$[
G$il*tj
.i ,$
"9rIt | -\rF K\S
F.:(f-
l-Llf=>;lllC)
E;r5(:>dJ
=:-S>]--
(/)
bHO6s.. "
g
Hss i?
H\.^,El \\ r,/"
F rllJ?\\rr1 (D
COP YFf!-t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138 / 479-2r 39
FAX 303-479-24s2
December 16. 1994
D e p aru n e nt of Comntun iry D eve lop me nt
Mr. Eric Johnson
Gwathmey Pratt SchulE Architects
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Covered Bridge Building
Dear Eric:
Thank you again for attending the December 7, 1994 Design Review Board (DRB) meeting toreview a variety of issues regarding the Covered Bridge Bu-ilding. As you are aware, the DRBapproved the final colors. for the building/railings. The vote for approval was unanimous (5-0).
This approval caried with it the following fourionditions:
1. That the two entry lights located adjacent to the lower level retail space be
removed and that the previously approved "coach lights" be installed. The DRB
did recognize that the existing lights were only temporary, and would be in
place only untilsuch time as lhe permanent lights couldbe delivered and
installed.
2.
e
Thatlhe ADA required tift, adjacent to Bridge street, be modified by adding
wood cladding to the lift and by painting any exposed metal surfaces the"Navajo Red" to match the railing color on the building.
That the developer work with the Town of Vail Fire Department in order to lower
the two stand pipes which are located in the planter at the southeast corner of
the building, adjacent to Bridge street. The DRB questioned whether the height
of lhe stand pipes was actually delermined by the Fire Gode? Generally, the
DRB lelt th.at the stand pipes detracted from the aesthetic quatity of thebuilding
and strongly recommended lhat they be lowered. The DRB has required that,
should there be some code requirement which would not allow the stand pipes
to be lowered, then the developer of the Govered Bridge Building would need to
come back to the DRB with an "adequate'screening plan for the stand pipes.
That the developer ol the covered Bridge Building discuss with the property
owner to the south (Pepi Gramshammer) the possibitity of removing the "yellow-
9ol9l9d stucco", adjacent to the southeast corner of the CovereO Biidge
Building, and substitute cladding or stucco painted to match the coveied Bridge
Buildino.
4.
o
Mr. Johnson
December 16, 1994
Page Two
lf you should have any questions or comments regarding any of the above, please feel free to
contact me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
U'A /4'%-
Mike Mollica
Acting Director of Community Development
xc: Peter Dann
oo
-b K-l3
Fn;. \rL*.-- aq-/{-4,;4 *^Z/ -/4-..<- o' Tr.
12,'7,?4 C-."--l b
ry 4A c-J4/+s<-f*.
+f/^*-4
?#f^ "y";/
-7*4
0 o-,* zy'+ ar+z- ,U -4/)a *'t/" f*
/6 ".#*/ . l ov.,cr( -
Q f<t^.,".^, e,J rtTt-t-at-V'A 4 f-< b^4-- -r
e,z>w-1 /r-'t .t bl"-|
@ \*;..--- --/ /f -,-v.'-?{< '2e* cJt;r I
' (Z-(
zd'l- 5+ll.y ' /
/tk-, >4
t.rr..A 7 /14 /9a
DESIGN VAIII,REVIEW BOARD APPLTCATION . TOI{N OF
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
********tt*
t l-<
Il4[/ DEl'/, DEPI
B,rtLDrr._y-z&t
ITD
I.
tl****!r****
PROJECT INFORMATION | @,,@ED
A.DESCRrprroN: A.,llzvr\i__?*..,s1""
B.
D.
TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Const,ruction (9200.00) X*rinor AlreraEion ($20. O0)Addition ($50.00) Conceprual neview (g0)
C. ADDRESS:22.1 p?J,tw.
LEGAL DESCRIPTTON:
Subdivision IJO t,Block
If property is described bydescription, pleiase provideto this applicat.ion.
E. ZONING:CC- 7.
a meets and bounds legal
on a separate sheeL and aLtach
NAME OF APPLICANT:P*ftvp.c=Mailing ^Q,ddress:*vo'r-^,
G. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:C^o?> A.'-ctiu1ury'+
Mailincr Address: LoOO +,vaLt c- ---
H.NAME OF OI,IINER(S) :
Mailing Address:t^-J, l''>r*-
Phone
APPLrcATroNs llil'L Nor BE PRocEsssD wrrfiow.orrtrrEe,s srGNA?uRE
Condominium Approvat if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are Lo be paid aE theLime of submitt.al of the DRB applilation. l,iter, whenapplying for a buirding permit,-ptbase identify Lhe accuratevaluation of the proposal . The town of vail will adjust thefee according to the Eable below, to ensure the correct feeis paid.
I.
,J.
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
4 n ,l. .r r\ n^n.y v o r\r.trrru
$10,001 _g 50,000
$ s0, 001 - $ 1s0, 000
$1s0, 001 - $ s00, 000
9500, 001 - $1,000, 000$ over $1,000,000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPTRES
APPROVAI, IJNIJESS A BUIIJDING PERMIT ISIS STARTED.
1r't-
FEE
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
ONE YEAR AFTER FINA!
ISSIJED AND CONSTRUCTION
f**
ftc,/l.
@--
November 28, 1994
Mike Mollica, Senior Planner
Town of Vail, Department of Community Development
11 1 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Covered Bridge Building
227 Bddge Street
Vail, GO
The following is a request lor staff rauiew of minor alterations to the above previously approved project.
The items presented are a result of field adjustments required during construction, clarifications to DRB,
and Permit Drawings.
1. EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME
MATERIALS TYPE COLOR
Roofing Cedar Natural/fire retardent
Sidins/Sof f it/Trim Cedar Olvmpic 726llt. Mocha
Fascia/Beams Cedar/D. Fir Olvmpic Tlll0otlee
Stone Rainbow Mix Varies
Stucco Off-White La Habra X-17lMistv
\Mndows/Doors Clad Kawneer Redwood
Deck Railings Cedar Olvmpic Navaio Red
Metal Railinss Steel Kawneer Redwood
Flashings Copper Natural
Chimneys Copper Natural
This represents the items broughrt to our attention by the Town Planner, Suppliers, and the Contractor to
date. We hope these items are minor in nature and that the original intent ot the approved project is
intact.
Should the opinions or observations of others differ, please submit them in writing or call.
Sincerely,
Gwathmey/Praft/Schultz, P. C.a,
Eric Joh
B,r
c))
0Et 7 19s{
Address: 221 8ntllp (f-
Account Number: 01'0000-22026
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
1t)\r i,jllii,,i' DEV'
GASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
Legaf Descriprio n: Lov!- Bloct< 9-.8
Subdivision U*rl V;lleta lgt Filing 1
Dats of E xpi ratio n:_LJ,F!9-
and
OF
THIS AGREEMENT, made and eqtprpd into this ?t! Oay ofD-cg9mber-..- t991! by
among covered Bridqe Bldq{dfdrBinaner called the "Developer"), and the TOWN
in condominium
VAIL (hereinafter called lhe "Town").
WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval of the Tco for covered BridgeBuildingplans, dated lhecer"lep 12. ,19?1, wishes lo enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, lhe Developer is obligated lo provide security or collaleral sufficient in the
ludgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of cerlaln improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral lo guaranlee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
following:
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit with the Town of Vail in a dollar amount
of $ 4 4 . zs0 - (1257o of the total cost of the work shown below) to provide security
for lhe following:
IMPROVEMENT
The following measures reguiredBridge Build.ing:
1. Installation of firewindow2. Flower boxes
for the completion of the Covered
3. Slate on 4th level deck4. Siding on 4th floor west side of condominium5. Chiller enclosure doors6. Painting of roof vents7. Landscaping8. Signage
Total
x 125t $44 ,7 50
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mulual covenants and
agreements, lhe Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cosl and expenses, to fumish all equipment
and material necessary.to perform and complete all improvements, on or beforeJnne tr 5 , @*A tlrrllihe Developer shall complete, in a good workmantike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the Community Development Department, the Town of Vail, and to do all work
incidental lhereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specificalions, sketches, and other mafter
submilled by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other
official lrom the Town of Vail, as aflected by special districts or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Development Department and public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee perlormance of its obligations as set forth herein, theDeveloper agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
$3,000
$1,500
$4,000
$5,000
$1,500$ 500
$9,800
$9, 500
;3p,*# 35,roo N
Pag€ 1 ot 3
A cash deposlt account in lhe amount ol $ aa.zso.oo to be held by theTown, as
escrow ag6nt, ahall provlcle the rocurlty lor thc lmprovements sot forth above lf thoro l!
a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set lorth
above for another form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guaranteo the talthlul
completion of lhose improvements relerred to herein and the performance ol the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternalive collateral shall be at lhs Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shallnot, nor shall anyofficer or employee lhereol, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specilied in
lhis Agreement prior to the complelion and acceptance of lhe same, nor shall lhe Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property iniured by reason of the
naiure ol said work, but all ol said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless lhe Town, and any of its
oflicers, agenls and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or olher expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or delending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addilion to any other liability which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize lor partial release of the collateral deposited wilh the Town for each category
ol improvement al such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amounl of lhe collateral lhat is being held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town determines that any of lhe improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set forth herein by the date set
lorth in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall nol be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary to complele the unfinished improvemenls. The
Town shall release such funds upon the wrilten request of the statf of the Community
Development Deparlment stating lhat the improvements have not been completed as required
by lhe agreemenl. The Town shall not require lhe concurrence of lhe developer prior to the
release of the funds, nor shall the Town be required to verily independently that the
improvements have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon lhe request of lhe Community Development Department.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collecled by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle Counly to be
collected in lhe same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. tf
the permit holder fails or refuses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapler, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violalion of the Zoning Code.
7. The Developer warranls all work and material for a period of one year after
acceptance of all work refened to in this Agreement by the Town pursuant to Section
17.16.250 il srrch work is located on Town of Vail property or within Town ol Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to lime, provided that such amendmenls be in writing and execuled by all parties hereto.
Dated the day and year first above wrilten.
Page 2 of 3
o
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING, LTD.
DEVELOPER
By: East-WeatSTATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLOHADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
uodsted 0128/94
Partners, Inc. rGeneral Partner
ss.
d."'fi l"ii'""i::'?:1":':iiqi,8i"P::llH"ffi:'Ui:of East-West Partners, Inc'., general Partner
Witness my hand and officlalseal. ' Ltd'
My commisston exptres:
t'l - 1A ' I
kl/. h"1z:-
PLANNER. COMMUNIW DEVELOPMENT
of Covered Bridge Building,
before me this
)
) ss.
)
Witness my hand and officialseal.
My commission expires /qq y
Page 3 of 3
,,4!)/ CASH DEPOSI,f FORMAT'
Legal Description: LoF-| Block'B
T t, r\, Subdivision t/$l ullB<. l?t_ _ Filing r
I Uy . t utrrn, dt y, dilffi,: :, *;,;::,ffi#-
Account Numberl oi -oooo-22028
, , .!b,-
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
I-Frnt"rr-Fr-''.
0t.u '!, .,.,.
THIS AGREEMENT, made and etleled into this JtL A^y of pecember , 19g4, by
and among covered Bridqe Btdg.fiEfleinalter called the "Oevetoperl, anO tne fOWtt
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the 'Town").
WHER-EAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval oJ 16" TCo of covered
HdrH dated )ecer^Le,c- ra- , 19fr., wishes lo enter into a Developer lmprovement
r
u
B
B
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated lo provide security or collateral sufficient in the
Judgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certaln lmprovements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, lhe Developer wishes to provide collateral lo guaranlee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
to"o*'nl.u,
,or", ^sfi:o;:lirl,' *sh deposit with the rown or Vair in a dorar amount
of $>3soi4{- Sf,5l{rcfi{hato{aboostskthc$mkxhswnficjorul>lo provide security
for the following:
In the even e tree northeast of the covered Bridge Building dies because
Nr\c'of damage created during the construction of the Coiered Bridle Building,Developer shall replace said tree with a ne\d tree at a maximum cost ofrl r-aafoTn'r>r'--b8€C- In the event damage is caused to the tree in association withthe Town's activities, including but not limited to the reconstruction ofthe Covered Bridge, then the maximum amount which shall be expended upontree replacement shall be g2,900, or one half of such value of the treeshall be later determined. The Town and the Developer agree that theestablished replacement cost of the tree has been a-complished by theTgwnrs expert and, in the event the Developer i.s able to provj-de the Townwith a report of an expert, and supporting documentation, establishing alower cost of replacement of the tree, the amount posted with the Townhereunder shall be reduced in accordance with such ne\,ir amount.
NOW, THEHEFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, lhe Developer and lhe Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and_ material necessary tgBBplorm and complete allirnFnolamanbxsnlxbeloraobligations onor before Dec. 1, . 'frleoDeveloper shall complete, in a good workmanlike manndr, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the Community Development Department, the Town of Vail, and lo do all work
incidental thereto according to and in compliance wilh lhe following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specificalions, skelches, and other malter
submilted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, lhe Town Building Official, or other
official from lhe Town of Vail, as aflected by special districts or service districts,
as their respectlve interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Development Department and Public Works Departmgnt.
2. To secure and guarantee performance of its obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide security and collaleral as lollows:
idgeilding
Page 1 of 3
5'? 5'1'a-e \'1{-
A cash deposit accounl in the amount of W94-- to be held by the Town, as
escrow agent, shall provide the security for the lmprovements set forth above if there ls
a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any lime substitute the collateral originally set forth
above for another form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithlul
completion ol those lmprovem€nts referred to hereln and the performance of the terms ol thls
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative collaleral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
.4. The Town shall not, nor shall any ollicer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible lor any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to lhe work specilied in
this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property Inlured by reason of lhe
nature ol said work, but all ol said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any ol its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or olher expenses reasonably incurred by lhe Town in
connection with investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply lo the Town and the Town
shall authorize lor parlial release of lhe collaleral deposiled with the Town lor each calegory
of improvement at such time as such improvemenls are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount of the collateral that is being held be reduced below the amounl
necessary to complele such improvements. The collateral shall be releasedif the subject tree is tiving on December 1, L996.
6. lf the Town delermines that any of the improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set lorth herein by the dale set
forth in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall not be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary lo complete the unfinished improvements. The
Town shall release such funds upon the wrilten request of the staff of the Community
Development Department stating that the improvements have not been completed as required
by the agreement. The Town shall not require lhe concurrence of the developer prior to the
release of lhe lunds, nor shall the Town be required to verily independently that the
improvemenls have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon ths request of the Community Development Deparlment.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed lhe amount of lhe deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the lreasurer of Eagle County to be
collected in lhe same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf
the permit holder fails or refuses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning Code,
7. The Developer warrants all work.and material for a period of one year after
acceptance of all work relerred to in this Agreement by the Town pursuant to Section
17.16.250 if such work is located on Town of Vail property or within Town of Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties hereto mulually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and execuled by all parties hereto.
Dated the day and year firsl above written.
Prge 2 ol 3
+k The for-egoing QeveloPer lmPh\ a^y ol D,i,er.-',.,Q.r. '. rgtioYof East-West Partners, Inc'., general
Witness my hand and official seal.
l,rly commission explres: q- l'.} - q S
COVERED BRIDGE BIITT.DTNG. T.TD'.
DEVELOPERBy! East-West Partners r Inc. , General Partner
ackn this
of Covered Bridge Building,
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNry OF EAGLE
)
) ss.
)
ss.
By:Tit
partner
Lrd.
4* het-
PLANNER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
fu- o X"",t:'SfiIt
ot8[o:r lffi ve5 .As-?9em$tv?s qcknowredsed berore me th is.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commiss ion "roi, "ffi!/
updsted 92864
Page 3 of 3
7J South Frontage Rosd
Vsil, Colorado 81617
103 -47 9 -2 1 t 8 / FAX )0t -47 9 -2 1 66
D ep artm e nt of P ub li c lI'ork s /Trans portat i 0n
}IEUORANDT'U
To: Ton lloorbead, Towtr AttorneyFron: Todd oppenbeiner, park SupirintendentDate: Decenber 2, 1991REs Covered Bridge Building Maintenance Agreement.
r had an opportunity to speak with peter Dann this morningT:?:fgiy .three topi-s conclrnins tr," - c""".J'srid;"- ";ii;i;;tmprovements. Attached is sketc-h plan of tne covered BridgeBuildi-ng improvements arong nriage street. peter Dann has reviewthis sketch and is in agreement riitn tne i-ntoirnation it contains.
so, the finar agreernent shourd be as we discussed with Greg Harland Mike Molrica at our rast neeting ,ith-i;; covered BridgeBuirding ovrners . maintaining the steps and ar1 constructedimprovements to the south. - The Town wilr. then naintain arlconstructed inprovements north of the steps ., ""ir as maintain theflowers in the three beds indicated and tie iriig.tron in alr fourbeds' constructed -irnprovenents incrudes p"".i-,'rtonework, walrs,railings and heat_ing- systems. Mainten-ance Jr the constructedimprovements includis - creaning, snow removar, repair andreplacement. Greg Halr suggest!' having rnteirntuntian draft nysketch on to the p1an. sh_ee!, ii, prace of J formar regar descriptionfor the improvements includear ii the Revocaure niqht-of-way permit.
The second topic of discussion was the i*igation mainline to berun through the..building crawr space. peter Dann agreed thatbecause of the difficulti involvea in gaini"g-""""rs to the rinethat the covered p5idve etiiraing owner wourd rernain responsible fornaintaining the tine.-
Finarly, r have increased the amount of the corrateralization forthe darnaged tree due to .r "r.oi in rny "iigi""i-farculation. Theamount of the bond or retter of credil shorita be s5800.oo. peterDann had discussed this with lvrike Mollica prior to or* conversationand it was agreed that the anount that r airived at wourd be bondedfor now and that peter nay hire a certified Tree Appraiser at alater date.
Hopefully this inforrnation will assist in completing the easenentsand agreernents needed to grant the T.c.o. for itre uu:_taing. preasecall me if you have any guestions.
xc. Greg Hall
Mike Mo]l_ica
'J*0a
&
@
q
t\,-\rl.
q
U
P"lq
g
AP
$ot€
^ltJ \, €Z 9 E
4{ ao:2 6SF E
nrZ IEE P
-.+-J5 * r.."(rFQ: --C
rd:a2l1.- 2\ii !P: ?
d r$5
\9u, o,
o
2l4sl
IA
)
alar{2,{
r.lzcl+
Yl
U9Zul4f
3gFo
i E,;tsg
s$itk4
"r 3t2doI r-Qrg
33r
cui
ir$
--<rl
j.iza( 9;I .tli o'Tzo2r{r <it'
2.aF.F- ; $ rf,l **t-.T$ r {-5ji: L, Gt -Gd dl *Ft..^1r 9a 'f rI Xl rr !,i;? 'dts zzIF.q o- se i*d*, i4 if ff;' .. ,iF i,i i\,
$ di.., Eg r:6dL-+6 " )F4 0F * *lr,l " ri rll
)l
d
4&
t-
u)J\)oo-
i
)
o
I
q
4u
-,
ZaJ
1
cA
,
4
q
d
id
fl
er
dl
/lnl
rr{
ii
75 Sottb Ftontagc Road
Vtil, Colorado 81657
t0t -47 9 -2 r t 8 / FAX t0t -47 9 -2 | 66
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Dcpartment of Pfilic llorkslTrtnsportttion
MEMORANDUM
PETER DANN, TONY FAULHABER, TODD OPPENHEIMER'
GREG HALL AND SKE ITOLLICA
CHARLIE DAVIS
DECEMBER 2, 1994
TCO FOR COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
The following items need to be completed before a TCO will be released by the Town ol
Vail Public Works Department:
1) Verity that staging on Town of Vail pocket park area is allowed through the winter
verify this with Todd Oppenheimer.
2l Construction trailer is to be removed trom Gramshammer property. Tony
conveyed that the trailer will be removed on 1213F4.
3) The traffic control device in Gore Creek must be removed.
4) All easements and survey work relating to this must be complete. Please work
with the Town atlomey, Tom Moorehead, on this'
5) Bonding for all incomplete landscaping including an amount for a tree that has
been dbmaged during excavation. This same tree must be stabilized (guyed
down).
6) All materials, tenting and debris must be removed from the Bridge Street side of
the Covered Bridge Building.
7l All brick paver work must be complete. lf it isn't @mplete, it must be bonded'
I will not be available during the week ol 1215194. lf there are any questions, please
contact Todd Oppenheimer at 479-2161.
Thank you,
Charlie Davis, Town of Vail Construction Inspector
l
TOWN OF VAIL
7 5 Soutb Fronttge Road
Vail,, Colortdo 816J7
t0t -479-21 t 8 / FAX )01 -47 9 -2 1 66
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Department of Public VI/orks/Transp ortn tion
\iIEMORANDUM
Mike Mollica, Acting Director of Community Development
Todd Oppe n hei me r, Park Su pe ri nte ndenVlandscape Arch itect
November 22,1994
Inspection of Trees on Covered Bridge Pocket Park
d"'
At your request I have made an inspection ol the Spruce trees on the Covered Bridge
Pocket Park site. The purpose of this inspection was to determine what, if any, darnage
has been done to the trees during the construction of the Covered Bridge Building. Any
damage to the trees as a result of the construction activity is to be collateralized by the
developer prior to issuance of occupancy certificates in accordance with the development
agreement.
A considerable amount of work and construction staging did occur in the vicinity of the
trees on the park site. Some pruning was allowed to remove dead and interfering
branches during the course of construction. All pruning was approved by myself and was
completed by a qualified arboflist. The staging of construction materials does not appear
to have caused significant root zone compaction on damage to the trees.
During the excavation stage of construction and associated with the stabilization of Bridge
Street one Spruce tree received considerable damage to it's root system. This damage
was documented by Charlie Davis, Construction lnspector. This tree should be
collateralized by the developer.
The tree damaged is located at the southwest corner of the Covered Bridge. lt is a
mature Spruce with a double trunk 10 inches and 12 inches in diameter. This tree is an
important element in the established view corridor o{ Vail Mountain from the Village
Parking Structure steps. This gives the tree some historic significance. The tree had
received previous root damage but was not showing signs of decline.
Page 2
Mike Mollica
Inspection of Trees at CBpp
To determine the monetary valve of this tree a professional plant appraiser, atfiliated with
the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers should be consulted. An independent
third party appraisal will probably be more acceptable to all parties.
In an effort to clarify the scope of the valve in question I have applied the "Trunk Formula
Appraisal Method" formula to this particular tree. Keep in mind itrat this application is for
reference only. I am not a professional plant appraiser. The factors used in determining
the valve inclyle species, condition, location, size and replacement cost of the largeJt
normally available tree. In my calculation this particular tree has a monetary valve of
$1,890.00.
The valve placed on the appraisalfactors in somewhat judgmental. lstrongly recommend
that a professional plant appraiser be consulted to determine an appropridte amount tocollateralize. I will contact the Council of Trees and Landscape Appraisers for a list ofqualified appraisers at your request.
cc:Tom Moorehead
Larry Grafel
II
COVERED BRIDGE
PROPERTY COVERED BRIDGE
BUILDING TENANT,
COFFEE COI''{PANY
227 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
PRO.]ECI COVERED BRIDGE
8r657
COFFEE COI'IPANY
DAIE NoVEMBER 4, 1994 Vail, Colorado
TOTAI. PARKING FEE g 12,600.00
fn installnents after dat,e, for value receivedr I promise to pay
to the order of the Town of vail at, the Office of the Finance
Director, Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado,
TWELVE THOUSAND SIX HUMRED AND NO/IOOTHS-----Dol1ars
Totaf Parking Fee
Down Payment I 2,520.00 with interest of ten percent per annum
on the unpaid EaianceJ payable in yearly installments as follows:
First installment of $r.tzq.gs due and payable on LLl4/95
Second installment of 9:.rzg.gs due and payable orL nl4196
Third installrnent of $g.rzq.gs due and payable o\ lIl4l97
Fourth installrnent of S:.tzg.qs due and payable on ll/4i98
ft is agreed that if tnis note is not paid when due or declared
due hereunder, the principal and accrued interesL thereon shall
draw int,erest at the rate of 18 petcent Per annum, and that
failure Lo make any payment of principal or interest when due or
any default under any encurnbrance or agreement securing this note
shall. cause the whole note to become due at once, or the interest
to be counted as principlal, at the option of the hol'der of the
note. The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive
presentnent for payment, protest, not,ice on nonpaymenE and ofprotest, and agree to any extension of time of payment andpartial payments before, dtr or after rnaturity, and if this note
or interest, thereon is not paid when due, or suit is brought,
agree to pay aLI reasonabte costs of collection, including
reasonable attorneyt s fees. IE is further agreed that the Company,
Kendra Iloover and Julie Iverson are 1iab1e hereunder, jointly and severally.
of
Date:
Covered Bridge Coffee Conpany
NovEl'lBER 4, 1994
JULIE Iof Covered ridge Coffee
yan
NOvernber 4 r994
C ornpany
\
I
' Covered Bridge
o
Coffee Shop
PARKING FEE $12,600.00
INITIAL PAYMENT $2,520.00
PORTION FINANCED $1O,O8O.OO
INTEREST RATE 1Oo/o
YEARS FINANCED 4
DATE OF DOWN PAYMENT 11104194
PAYMENTAMOUNT $3,179.95
TOTAL
PAYMENT DATE PAYMENT # PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENT
11104194 Down pymt $2,520.00 $2,520.00
11t04t95 1 $2,171.95 $1,008.00 $3,179.95
11104t96 2 $2,389.14 $790.81 $3,179.95
11t04197 3 $2,628.05 $551.89 $3,179.95
11t04t98 4 $2,890.86 $289.09 $3,179.95
$12.600.00 $2.639.78 $15.239.78
PKINSTC.WK4
STA|E OF
o
CO LORADO
Roy Romer, Governor
Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH, frecdive Oirector
Dedicated o protrcting nd improing tlr' hea/ry', and environmentol the Pple o[ Cobndo
4300 Cherry Creel Dr. S. [aboraory Building
Denver. Colorado 80222-1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue
Phone (303) 6e2-2ooo l;$T6r.:*f;" *220-3716
November 21, 1994
Peter G. Dann
Covered Bridges Building Limited
P.O. Box 5480
Avon, CO E1620
CERTIFIED MAIL NO.: P 162 E29 082
RE: Final Permit, Colorado Wastewater Discharge Permit System
Number: COG47U22 - Covered Bridges Building Limited
C,olondo Dcpartrncnt
of hblicfledrh
rndEnvimnmsrt
Dear Mr. Dann:
Enclosed please find a copy of 0re permit and your certification which was issued under the Colorado Water
Quality Control Act. This permit requires that specific actions be performed at designated times. You are legally
obligated to comply with all terms and conditions of the permit and certification. It is especially important to
note the effective date which can be found on page one of the Certification. It is illegal to discharge per the
conditions of this permit until that date.
Please read the permit and if you have any questions contact this office at 692'3590.
il.;a-
Robert J. Shukle, Chief
Permits and Enforcement Section
Water Quality Control Division
xc: Permits Section, Environmental Protection Agency
Regional Council of Government
Local County Health Department
District Engineer, Field Support Section, WQCD
Derald Lang, Field Support Section, WQCD
Enforcement Office, Permis and Enforcement Section, WQCD
Permit Drafters, Permits and Enforcement Section, WQCD
Enclosure
RIS/mlb
A, *'. coc,7w
Faciliry No. COG47O422
Page I
CERTIFICATION
AATHONZATION 71O DISCHARGE ANDER THE
CDPS INDASTRIAL GENERAL PERMIT
*,,"f f ,sflxtr:;i:"tr:yiffi {8""::#yf*t;:f l:'if !o},*,0,
This pemit speciftally awhorbes, Covered Bridges Building Iinited
Paer G, Dann
P. O. Box 548o
15 Highlards lzne, Beaver Creek Resort
Awn, CO 81620
(303)+%9s071
with the facility contact of, Sant as above
to dischargefromfacilities identifed as rtc Covered Bridgc BuiUing Foundation Drain and Coohng System Disclurge
proiect, locaed in the NW 1/4, Section 8 , T5S, RWW, Eagle @unty, 227 Bridge Snea, Vail, @lorado as shown infgure 1
of the permit, Jrom Dbcharge Poiu identified as 0OI as shown in figure 2 of the permit and Junher identifed and described in
rhb table,
,t",;,5t[;fi;grit:
.: :,::,,1,,: a,' :: P bi nt :, :,:,
.l
t,.l..f..i'b;;ffi
.i .:'
N1 Discharge from the smling basin prior to enteing Gore Oeek Avg. : jg tO^
Man : 350 gpm
This General Permit will cover the discharge until the Individual permit is issued for this sitc. Perminee must request
inactivation of this General Permit once the Individual is issued.
The discharge is to Gore Cnek, Segment 8 of the Eaglc Pjver Sub-basin, Upper Colordo River Basin, found in 3.3.0
Classifuatbns atd Nwneric Standardsfor the llpper Cobrado River Basin (5 CCR l@2-8), as atncnded Septenber 7, 1993.
Segment 8 has been classfied for the following uses: Recreation, Class I; Aquatic Life, Class I GoA); Agricuhure; Water
Supply.
Salinity QDS) monitoring of the discharge will be required.
Phosphorus monitoing of the discharge wiII not be required.
Antidegradation review does not appty to this permit. New load will be less than 10% oJ baseline load.
Refer to page 4 of the permit Jor applicabk limitatians and to page 5 for nnnitoring requirements.
All conespondence relative to this facility should refererce the specfu faciliry nwt'tber,COG47L422.
Efrctive II/2!E!__ Cenified Lexer No._L !62 829,882-.--__...-
Tom Boyce
October 6. 1994
Thi-r facility pernil coruains 18 pages.
tPagc2
Pcrmit No. COG47000O
CDPS GENERAL PERMIT
FOR CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING OPERATIONS
AUTHORIZATION TO DISCIIARGE {JNDER TIIE
COLORADO DISCIHRGE PERMTT SYSTEM
In conrpliancc with thc provisions of thc colorado warcr Quatiry control Act (25-8- tol cr. se4. cRS, 1973 as amcndcd),operdlions cngagcd in construction dcwatcring of ground watcn (cxcluding minc dewatcring adivil.ics) arc authorized lodischar-r:c from approved locations throughoui rhc srare of Colorado ,o .p..ifi"a watcrs of *rc srate. Such dischargcs shallbc in accordancc wirh tbc condirions of rhis pcrmir.
This prmit spccifically authorizes thc facility lisrcd on pagc I of this pcrmir to dischargc groundwatcr from consrrucri.ndcwr(cring activities' as of this datc, in acnrdzne with thc pcrmit rcquiremcnrs and conditions sc! forth in parts I and tthcrcrrf' All discharges authorizcd hcrcin shall bc consistcnt with thc terms and condirions of this pcrmit.
Tlris permit and.thc aurhorizarion lo dischar_ec shall cxpirc ar midnight.
Scprcurber 30, 1998
lssued and Signcd rhis 5ch day of May, 1993
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
y'. p[vid-Elotm, Dirccror
.{Vatcr Qualiry Conrrol Division
o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
A. COVERAGE TINDER T}IIS PERMIT
B. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONTTORING REQUIREMENTSl. Effluent Limirations
2. MonitorineRequirements
3. Footnot€s
c. REPORTINGREQUREMENTS
t. ReoresentativeSamnling
2. Reoortine
3. Tcst Proccdures
4. Recordine of Results
6
6
5. Calculations6. Rccords Retcntion
7. Additional Monitoring by Permincc
7
8
8
PART tr
A. MANAGEMENTREQINREMENTS
l. Cbanee in Discharec2. Soecial Notificarions - Definitions
9
9
9
9
0
3. NoncomolianceNotification
4. Submission of Incorrect or Incomplete Information .....15. Bloass .
6. Bwass Notificarion
7 . Uosets .
8. Removed Substanccs
9, Minimization of Adverse Imoact
10. Discharge Point
ll, Reduction. Loss. or Failurc of Treahcnt Fsciliw12. Prooer Ooeration snd Maintenance
13. Discharee Efifluenr Samoline
14. Siqnatorv Reouirement
....10
. . . . .ll
. . . . . . ll
I. RESPONSIBILITIES
l. Inspections and Riebt to Entrv l3
l3
l3
l3
l3
l4
l5
2. Dutv to Provide Ipformation
3. Transfer of Owncrshio or Contmt4. Availabilir.v of Reeorts
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Permit Violations
Prooert], Riehts
10. Sevcrabilitv
ll. Renewal Aoolication
12. Confidentialitv
13. Fccs
Modification. Suspension. or Rcvocation of pcrmits Bv the Division
Oil and Hazardous Substance Liabilitv
14. Reouirine an Individual CDPS Permit
15. Reouestine an Individual CDPS Permir
l6
l6
...16
.1616. Reouestine Coveraee Under the General Permit
-2a-
PART I
Page 3
Permit NO.: COG470000
COVERAGE UNDER TTIIS PERMIT
l. In order to bc considered eligible for autborization to discbargc undcr lhe tcrms aDd conditions of this permit,
the owuer, opcrator, and./or authorizcd agent of any facility eogaged ia construction dewatering, and desiring to
discharge must submit a complacd application form obaincd from rle Wster Quality Cootrol Division. Such
application sball bc submincd at lcast thirty (30) days prior to the aaticipatcd datc of first dischargc to:
Colorado Departmcnt of Hcalth
Wetcr Qudity Contml Division
wQcD-PFB2
4300 Cherry Crcck Drivc South
Denver, Colorado n222-1530
Aucotion: Pcrmis aad Eoforccment
The pcrmit issuiug authority sball bave up to thirty (30) &ys affcr reccipt of thc above application to lEgucst
additional rlqra as6l/e1 dcny thc aulhorizatiou for aay particular dischargc. Upon rcccipt of additional
information thc pcrmit issuing authority shall havc an additional 3O &ys to issuc or deny authorization for any
particular dischargc.
If thc pcrson proposing thc dischargc docs not reccivc a rEquest for additional information or a notification of
dcnial from tbe permit issuing authority within thc specified time framc, authorization to discharge ia
accordaae with the conditioos of thc pcrmit sball bc decmcd graatcd. Authorization to dischargc sball bc sitc
spccific and not tramferablc to altcmativc locations.
If thc pcrmir issuiug authority dctcrmhcs tbat thc opcrstion docs not fall under the au&ority of thc gcneral
permit, then Oc iaforaation rcccived wi[ be treatcd es ao individual pcrmit, discbarge is not dlowcd unril 180
days aftcr Oc application bas bccn rcccivcd.
Authorization to dischargc undcr this gcocnl pcrmit shdl co--cncc on Octobcr l, 1993 and shall cxpire on
Scptcmbcr 30, 1998. Thc Division must cvaluatc this general pcrmit oucc cvery fivc (5) ycars aud must also
reccrtify thc appticant's autbority to discharge uodcr tbc geacral pcrmit, at such fine. Tberefore, a permince
dcsiring continucd covcragc under thc gencral pcrmit must rc-apply by April I, 1998. Tbc Division will
dacrminc if the applicant continues to operatc uodcr teros of thc gcneral permit. An individual pcrmit will be
reguircd for any facility not reautborizcd to discbarge un&r tbc reissucd general pcrmit. For facilitics wishing
ro rerminatc autborization undcr tbc ncw pcrmit, provisions of Part II.B,5 will bc appropriate.
2. This pcrmit docs not constitutc authorizatioo uudcr 33 U.S.C. 1344 (Scction 4Ol of thc Clcan Watcr Act) of
ary stream dredging or filliag opcrations.
In ordcr o bc coosidercd cligiblc for authorization to discbargc uudcr thc trrns snd conditions of tbis permit,
tbe owuer, opcralor, and/or authorizad agent of ely facility desiring to dischargc must submit, by ccrtified
lettcr,- the discbargc application form, available from thc Watcr Quality Control Divisiou, which gcnerally
requires thc following ioformatioo:
l. Name, addrcss, and descriptivc location of thc facility;
2. Nr"'c of principal ia cbargc of opcration of the facility;
3 . Name of watcr(s) rccciving tbe discharge(s);
4. Descriptiou of the typc of activity rcsulting i.n the discbarge including tbe anticipatcd duration of activity
and./or tbe discharge, aoticipated volumc, aod ratc of discharge, ald the source of water which is to be
discbarged;
a .iPART I
Page 4
Permir NO.: COG470000
A. COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT (CONT'D.)
B. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS A}.ID MO/MTORING REQUIREMENTS
l. Emuept Limitations - Constructiou Dcwatcrins Ac{ivities
5. Description of any wastc watcr tricshcot systcm and rccyclc/rcusc utilizcd; and,6. A map or schcmatic diagram showing tbc gencral arca and/or orring of Oc activity.7, Aaalysis of thc warcr to bc dischargcd8. Slorage of petrolcum or chcmicals on site.
Efflucnt Paranctcr Dschargc Limiations
3Gday averagc g/ Tday avcrage !/ Daily Maximum 9/
Flow, MGD N/A N/A Rcport
Total Suspeodcd Solids, mg/l 30 45 N/A
Total Dissolved Solids, mg/l
Colorado Rivcr Basia Onlv
N/A N/A Rcport
Total Phosphorus (as P), mgll
Sec Part I.C.?.C.
N/A N/A Rcport
pH sball remain between 6.5 aod 9.0 s.u. g/.
Oil and grcasc sball uot cxcccd l0 mgll,p/ nor chall thcrc bc a visiblc shcca f/.
a' Thcrc sball bc no dischargc ofany process geoeriatcd wastc waters cxccpt thosc waste wate6 resulting
from dewatcring of grouodwatcr and/or surfacc nrnoff from constructiou sitcs.
b. Tberc shall bc no discharge of sadtary w?stc waters froo toilers or related facilities.
c. No chemicals 8re to b€ sdded !o tbe dischargc unlcss permission for the use ofa specific chemical is
gnrt€d by thc Division. Ia gaating thc use of such cbcmicals, additionat limitations and monitoring
requirements may be imposed or an individual permit m8y bc rrquired.
d. Bulk storagc stnrcturcs for pcrroleum prrducts and othcr chcmicals shall have adequatc protcction so 8s to
contain all spills and prevent the material from eotcring discbarged waters or waters of lhe State.
Additioual requiremenls ere ser forth in Section 3ll of thc Fcderal Cleau Watcr Act.
O*r,
Page 5
Permit NO.: COG47000O
3. EFFLI'ENT IIMITATIONS AND MONITORINC REQUIREMENTS (CONT'D.)
2. Monitorine Requircmcnts - Construciion Dararcring Astivilics
In ordcr to obr-in an iadication of thc pmbablc oompliancc or aoncompliancc with thc cfflucnt lirnitations
spccified h Part I.B.1, thc pcrmiucc shall monitor all cftlucnt panmerers at the following rcquircd ftrcqucncies.
Sclf-monitoring samplcs taken in compliancc with thc monitoring reguirements specified abovc shall be taken at
thc point of dischargc prior ro enrcri.og watcrs of thc Statc.
'
3. Footnotcs
{ Thc thirty (30) day average shall bc dercmincd by lhc rrithrngtic m"^n of all sdmples collected during a
thirty (30) consecutiveday period. Samplcs shall not bc us€d for more than one reporting pcriod.
!/ - Tbc scven (7) day average shall be dercrnind by tbe arithmaic mcan of all samples taken oa sqrarate
days in a seven P) consccutivc-day pcriod. Sanplcs sbdl trot bc used for more than one rcporting period.
S/ - This limitatiou shall bc dercrmiled by a singlc samplc or set of samples as rcquired by Part I B. 2, Sampte
TyPc.
d/ - -Whca the mcasurcmcnt frequency itrdicated is quartcrly, thc samples shall be collected duriag March,
Junc, Septcmbcr and Deccmbcr, if a continual discbarge occurs. If the discharge is intcnnittent, then
sanplcs shall bc collccrcd duriag thc pcriod that discbargc occurs. If the lrrnittcc, using thc approvcd
alalytrcal melhods, monilors any parameEr morc ftoquently than required by this permit, then the results
of such monioring shall bc iocluded in thc calculation and reporting of the values required ir thc
Discbarge Monitoring Reporr Form or othcr forms as rcquired by tbc Division. Sucb increased frequency
shall also be indicated.
t
Efflucnt Parancter Mcasurcmcnt Frcqucacy {Sample 1}pc 9/
Flow, MGD Wcckly Instan'tancous or Contiauous
Total Suspcadcd Solids, mg4 T\,r,icc Monthly Grsb
OiI and Grcase, mg/l Wcckly Visual or Grab
pH, s.u.Monthly Grab
Salinity g/, b/arrlrtcrly Grab
Total Phosphorus (as P), mgll
Scc Fart I.C.7.C.
Quartcdy Grab
t
PART I I
Fage 6
Permit NO.: COG4TOOOO
B. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
9/ - Definitions of Samplc Typc
l. A 'coEPosite' sample, for monitoriag rcquircmcnt!, is a 'nini'num of four (4) grab samples
collected at equally spaced two (2) hour hGrvds and proportioned accordiag to flow.
2. A 'gtab" sanplc, for monitorbg requircmcnts, is a eiagle .dip and takc" sanple.
3. An 'instantancous' mcasurcment, for monitoring rcquirements, is a singlc leading, obscrvatioa, or
Ecasurement pcrformcd on sitc.
4. A 'coatinuous' mcssurenc[t, for flow mooitoriag rcquircmcnts, is a mcasurcment obtaincd frgm an
automatic recorditrg dcvice uAich contiaually mr"urcs flow.
5. Aa 'in-situ' mcasurcmcnt, for mouitoring rcquircmenls, is defincd as'a singte rcading, obscrvatioo
or tne:$urcrncDt takea il thc ficld 8t the poilt of dischargc.
6. A 'visual' observation, for oil and greasc monitoriag rcquircmcnts, is observing the discharge to
check for thc preseucc of a visiblc sbeca or floafiag oit.
fl - lo tbe cvcnt aa oil shccn or floating oil is obscrvod, a grab samplc shall bc collected, rnrtlzed, and
reportcd. In addition, corr€ctivc actioa sball bc taken immcdiaaly o mitigate ihe dischargc of oil and
grease.
g/ - Wherc based on a minimum of 5 sanplcs, thc pcrmiucc dcmolstralrs,.to thc satisfaction of rhe Water
Qualiry Conuol Division, thar thc lcvcl of Total Dssolvcd Solids CfDS) in the cfttuent can be calculared
based upon the level of clcctrical conduaivity, thc pcrmittcc rnay rncasure and rcport TDS ia tcrms of
clectrical conductivity.
!/ - Total Dissolvcd Soli& monitoring is required only for discbargcs to thc Cotorado Rivcr Basia. See
specific facility certification rationale to dctcrmine wbaher TDS monitoring is required.
C. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
l. Reoresentativesamoline
Samples eDd measuremcnts takcn 8s tequir€d hercia shall bc rcprescntative of the volume and uature of the
Dronitor€d discharge.
PART I
Page 7
Permit NO.: COG470000
C. REPORTING REQUREMENTS (Coatinucd):
2, Reoorting
Monitoring Esults for cach calcndar qusicr 8r€ duc by tbc 28th day of the following month. Tho t*ults Ehsll
bc sunmarizcd and rcportcd on applicable dischargc monitoring rtport forms (EPA Form 33n-D, posbarted
no Latcr than tbe due date. If no discbarge ocarn during tbc reportiag pcriod 'No Discharge' shall bc
rcportcd. Duplicatc signcd copics of thcsc and dl otber rcporrs required hcrcin, sball bc submiscd to the
Ragiooal Adoinistraor and thc Statc st the followiag addrcsscs:
Colorado Pceamcat of Hcalth
Wstcr Quslity Control Division
wQCDPE-B2
4300 Cherry Creck Drivc South
Dcnver, C,olorado U?22-l5n
Atcntion: Pcrnitr and Enforcemcnt
U. S. Environmentel Protaion Ageacy
Onc Denvcr Placc
Suite 5OO
999 l8th Strcct
Denver, Colorado Wnz-2&s
Ancatioo: Watcr Maaagaocot Divisioo-Compliancc Branch
EWM.C
Failurc to rubnit the reportr sball coastiotc e violation of thc permit aad grounds for revocatioo of tbe
permiucc's ccrtification to discbargc under this permit.
3. Test Proccdurcs
Tcst Pnoccdures for thc analysis of polluunts sbdl conform to regulations published pursurtrt to Seclion 304 (h)
of thc Act, and C;olorado Statc Effluent T imitatio[s (10.1.t, under nfrich such procedures may bc required.
4. Recordine of Resulrs
For cscb mcasurcEcnt or sample taken purs',qnt to thc rtquircmcnts of ttis pcrmit, the permifcc shall record
thc following informatioo:
a. Tbe cxact placc, &tc, and timc of sampting;
b. The dates thc analyses were pcrformed;
c. The pcnon(s) wbo pcrformed the aaalyses;
d. The analytical techuiqucs or mctlods usod; and
e. Tbe results of all requirad analyses.
5. Calculations for dl limitations which require avcragirg of measurements sball utilize an arithmetic me:n unless
' othcrwise spccified.
o
PART I
Page 8
Permit NO.: COG470000
C. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
6. Records Retcntion
All records and information resulting from the moaitorilg activitics required by this permit iucluding all
&alyscs performed and calibration and maiulcaancc of instnrmcntatiou and recordings ftom cootinuous
Eonilorfurg instnrmentation shall be rcraiocd for a minimum of threc (3) ycars, or longcr, if requcstcd by thc
Regional Administraror or lhe Water Qudity Contnol Dvision.
7. Additional Monitoring by Permiae
A. If thc permittec mooitors aDy potlutatrt rt thc loc8tior(s) dcsignatcd bcreir morc frequcurly thaa required
by this pcrmit, using approved aoalytrcal mahods as specified lbove, the results of such monitoriag sball
bc includcd in the cdculatior ard rrporting, of tbc vdues required in thc Dischargc Monitorilg Report
Form @PA No. 332&l), or othcr forms as rcquirod by tbc Dvision. Sucb increased frequency shall also
bc indicat€d,
B. The Division rescrvcs thc right to requcst further monitorbg of any pollutanG outside thc rcquiremcnts of
this pcrmit, as describcd b Part 1.C.7. of this pcrmit, !o ctrsurre thar tbc conditions of thc gcncral permit
ar€ mct and./or to cnsurc lhal thc antidegradation presumption is ovcrcome by sirc specific reasons
spccified in Sectioa 3. 1.8(l)(cXD(iixiii) of Tbc Basic Standards and Merhodoloeics for Surfacc Watcr. If
aay of thc additional monioring indicatcs pollutans of couccrn that nay impact the recciviag v,alers, or
necd limitations set, theD the Dvision shdl dcrcroiuc tbat etr idividud pcrnit is required and reservcs
thc right to rcquire that the dischargc ocasc until en iadividual pcrnit is ia cffcct. Tablc A dcscribcs thc
additional monitoriag lhd wil bc rcquircd for tbis facility, Additional monitoring sbdl bc includcd witb
thc Dischargc Monitoring Rcport @MR) and sball bc subjcct to thc p€nnit's monitoring and rcporting
rnquirements.
C. Total phosphonrs (as P) monitoring is rcquired for facilitics which dischargc into thc following drainagc
basins: Cberry Creck basin, Cbatfield Reservoir upstrean of the USGS gage st Watertou and ou Plum
Creck, Dillon Reservoir basin (i.c. Tcn Mile Crcck, Snakc River, Blue River, all tributaries !o tbc Dillon
Reservoir), and Bcar Creek basin. Thc Dvision also rcserves thc right to iictu.de phospbonrs monitoriug
for any receiviDg waters that may later entcr into phosphonrs moniroring requirements. If pbosphonrs
mouitoring is a requircment of the peroit tban it sball bc includcd within fts terms and conditions of thc
individual Certification Rationale of tbe pcrnit. Additional monitoring for pbosphorus sbell bc iacludcd
on thc Dscharge Mouioring Report @MR) aad sball bc subject to tbe permit's mouitoriug and reporting
rcquircments. If phosphorus monitoring is requircd tbc mcasurcmeut frequency shall be on a quarterly
basis, taken as a grab sample.
o
Page 9
PERMIT NO.: COG47000O
PART II
MANAGEMENT REQI,NREMENTS
t . Chauee in Discbarpc
The pcrmiccc sball inform thc Dvision @crmits and Eoforccment Scction) ia writing of any inant b cotrstruct,
install, or alar any proc€ss, facility, or sctivity that is likely to result in a acw or altcrcd discharge and shall
furnish thc Division such plals and spccifications uAich thc Dvision dccms reasonably neccssary to cvaluate
the cffecr on thc discbargc and recciviog srream.
Thc pcrmitte sball submit this noticc within two (2) urccb aftcr making a detcrmination to pcrform tbc tlpc of
activity refcrred !o in thc proccding paragraph. Proccss modifications bclude, but arc not limitcd to, tbc
iatroductioo of aay new pollut8rt not prcviously idcntified in thc pcrmit, or eny other modifications wbich may
result ia e dischargc of a quaatity or gudity diffcrcot fnom that wtich was applicd for. Following such notice,
thc pcrmincc shall bc roquired o submit r new CDPS applicetion and thc pcrmit may be modificd to speciry
6a! lirnil eay polluta*s not previously linitcd, if the ncw or eltcrcd discharge migbt bc inconsisrcnt with the
conditions of tbc existing pcrnit. h no casc shall tbc pcrmittce implcmeot such chaogc without first noti$iug
the Division.
2. Soccial Notificarioos - Definitions
a) Bypass: Tbc intcntional diversion of wastc str€aos from any portion of a tr€atnc[t facitity.
b) Scverc Pnoperty Damagc: Substantiat physical damagc to propcrty 8t thc tr€atment faciUties wtich causes
|hcm o become inopcrabtc, or substautial and pcrmaneot loss of natural nesourc€s which caa reasouably
bc expcctcd lo occur ia tbe abscocc of a blpass, lt docs aot mcan cconomic loss causcd by dclays in- production.
c) Spill: Ar uuintcntional relcasc of solid or liquid oatcrial nAich may causc pollution of sratc watcrs.
d) Upscr: Aa exccptional incidcnt in whicb thcre is uni"tcntional aud tcmporary noncomplialcc with pcrmit
cffluent limitations bccausc of factors beyond tbe rcasouablc control of Oc peroinec. Al upsa docs not
iucludc noncomplialoc o thc exteot causcd by opcrariooal crror, impropcrly dcsigncd trcatment facilitics,
imdequate treatmeDt facilitics, tack of prcvcntative EaiDtcnaDce, or carelcss or improper operatiotr.
3. NoncomolianccNotification
a) If, for any teason, thc pcrmiucc docs not cooply with or will bc unablc to comply with any maximum
dischargc limitations or statrdards spccificd ia this permit, tbe permincc shdl, at a roinimum, suboit in
wtitiog to tbc Warcr Quslity Contlol Division aad EPA within five days of becoming aware of such
conditions, the following information:
(i) A dcscription of tbc discbargc aad causc of noncompliancc;
(ii) Thc period of noncompliancc, includiog ex8ct datrs and timcs aad./or the anticipatcd tioe when the
dischargc will rcturu to coEpliatrcc; 8trd
(iii) Stcps bcing takco !o reducc, climioatc, and prcvent recureuce of the noocomplying discharge.
b) The pcrmittec shall rtport thc following instaaces of noncompliancc orally witbia tweaty-four (24) hours
frou thc timc thc pcnnittcc bccoocs aware of thc noncompliancc, aod shall mail to the Divisiou 8 report
within five (5) &ys aftcr becoming aware of the noncompliancc:
PARTtr I
Page l0
PERMIT NO.: COG4700@
A. MANAGEMENT REQLIIREMENTS (Continued)
(i) Aay iutancc of aoucompliancc which may end^nger hcaltb or the euvironmeot; .
(ii) Any une "ticipatcd bypass;
(iii) Aly upset which causcs atr cxceedancc of any cfflucnt limi6ii6a in thc pcrmit;
(iv) Any spill which csuscs atry cfflucnt limiatiou to bc violarcd;
(v) Daily maximum violuions for aay toxic pollutanc or hazardous subsrrnccs linitcd by PART I-A of
this pcrmit and spccificd as rcquiriag 24 hour notification.
c) Thc pcrmiacc sball report dl otbcr instanccs of aon+ompliaacc not rrportd under A.3(a) or A.3@) at the
timc Dischargc Monioring Reorts arc submittcd. Thc rcports shall contain thc samc information listcd in
sub-paragraph (a) of tbis sccrion.
4. Submission of Incorrect or Inoomolete Information
Wherc the perniucc failcd to submit any relcvatrt facrs iu a pernit application, or submitted incorroct
iafomcation ia a pcrmit application or r€port ro thc Dvision, thc pcrmiucc shall promptly submit thc relcvant
application informarion which was not submilcd or aay rdditiooal information nccded to conect atry e11oneous
information prcviously submitred.
5. Bvoass
The perainec may allow any bypass to occur which docs not csusc emuent liEitatiotrs to be excccded, but if
and only if it is for csscntial oainteaancc to sssurc efficicot opention.
Blpass is prohibitcd, 8!d thc Divisiou may takc caforccmcnt aaion against a pcrmittec for bypass, unlcss:
a) Bypass was uuavoi&ble to prcvcrt loss of life, pcsonal injury, or sevcre pr6pcrty rlam3gs; strd
b) Thcrc werc no fcasiblc altcrostivcs to thc blpass, sucb as thc use of auxiliary treatmctrt facilitics, r€lctrtion
of untreated wastcs, or Eaintcurcc during normal pcriods of cquipmcnt donrntime. Tlis condition is not
satisficd if the pcrmiucc could bavc insullcd adeguatc backup cquiprncnt !o pr€vcnt a bypass which
occurred during aormal periods of cquipmeut downrirnc or prcventativc maiatenaocc; and
c) Tbc perminec submitted notices as reguired ia'Bypass Notification., pan tr.A.6.
6. Byoass Notification
If the permince hows in edvancc of thc accd for e blpass, a noticc sball be submittcd, at least tcn days bcforc
the date of the bypass, to the Division and thc Eavironoeotal hotcction Agency @PA). The blpass sball be
subject to Division spproval and limitatioos inposcd by thc Division aod EpA.
NO.: COG47000O
A. MANhGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
7 . Upscts
a) Effecr of ao upset
Aa upsa constitutcs an ef,Ernstivc dcfeosc to an action brought for aonoompliaacc with pcroit effluent
limitarious if thc requircncas of paragraph @) of this scction are rnct. No dctcrmilation nadc during
administrativc rcvicw of clairnc ihat noncoopliaocc .uras causcd by upsot, atrd bcfors an sction for
noacompliance, is filal adrninistative ection subjcct to judicial rcvicw.
b) Coaditions neccssanr for a demonstration ofuoset
A pcrmiucc wbo wishes to cstablisb thc rffirmativc dcfcnsc of upsct shall dcoonnratc through popcdy
eigncd coatcmporaacous opaatiDg logs, or othcr rclcvant cvidcncc that:
G) i{n upser occurrcd aad that tbe pcrniucc can ideoti$ tbe spccific causc(s) oftbc upsa;
G) TLc pcrniucd hcility was at the tinc bcing propcrty opcratod; aod
(iii) Tbc pcroircc submitod ooticc of thc upscl ss requirod i! Part II A.3 of this pcrmit (2Ahour ncitice).
(iv) Tbc pcrmittcc complicd with any rcmedial Ecasurcs rcquired undcr Scctiou 122.7(6) of tbc fedqal
rcgulatious.
c) Burdcn of oroof
ID eny cnforccmctrt procccditrg thc pcrmiucc sacking !o cstablish the occusrucc of str upset has thc burdeu
of proof.
E. Rcmovcd Substanccs
Solids, sludgcs, or othcr pollutants rcmovcd ia thc coursc of trcatment or control of wastcwalcn sball bc
disposcd of ia a mrnner such ss to prevcnt any pollutant from such matcrials from cntcring watcrs of tbe State.
9. Minimization of Advcrse Imoact
Thc permittcc shall takc all rcasoaablc stcps to ltirinizc any advcrse inpsct to watcrs of thc Statc rrsulting
from nonmopliancc with any efflucnt limitgtioos specified in this permit, including such accelcrated or
additional oonitoriug as ncccssary to dctcrnirc thc satur€ and impact of lhc noocomplyiog dischargc.
10. Discharee Point
Any dischargc !o thc waters of thc Satc ftom a point source othcr than specifically autborizcd by this pcmit is
prohibitcd.
o
PART tr
Page ll
PERMIT
i
NO.: COG47@00
A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
I l. Reduction. I-oss. or Failurc of Treaiment Facilitv
The permiuee has tbe duty to halt or reducc aay aaivity if ncccssa4f to EaiDr.in compliancc with'thc effluent
limitations of thc pcrmit. Upon rcduaioa, loss, or failurc of thc tr€atmcnt facility, thc permittee shall, to thc
cxtent nccessary o maiatain compliance with ia permit, control produc{ion, or all dischargcs, or both until thc
faciliry is rcstored or an dtcroativc nabod of lrcatment is providcd. This provisioa for cxample, applies to
powcr failurcs, udcss aa altcraativc powcr soutcc sufficicnt ro opcrstc the wastcwatcr coutrol facilitics is
provided.
It shatl not be a defensc for a pcraiucc in an cnforccncnt action that it would bc noccssary to halt. or rcducc the
pcrmitred activity ia ordcr to maiutain compliencc with the conditions of this pcrmit.
12. Prooer Oocration and Mainrcnancc
Thc pcrniucc shdl 8l aU ti.ocs properly opcratc and D8itrtaitr dl frcilitics 8Dd syste'ns of trc8t6cnt and control
(and relared appurtcnanccs) ufiich ere insalld or uscd by thc pcrmiue to achievc complianoe with the
conditions of this pcrmit. hopcr opcration and maintcoalcc includcs cffcctivc pcrformancc, adcquatc funding,
adequatc opcrar,or sbffing 8.od traidrg, and adcquatc laboratory ard proccss @ltFols, including appmpriate
quality assurancc proccdurcs. This pmvision requires tbc opcratiou of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar
systens only *ten neccssary to achievc compliaacc with thc oonditions of thc pcrmit.
13. Discharec Effluent Samoline
Discbargc poios shall bc so dcsigncd or modificd tbat a samplc of thc effluent caa bc obuincd et a point aftcr
thc final trjeatrDent proccss and prior o discharge to stetc u/atcn.
14. Siepatorv Rcouiremeat
All reports required for submittd shall bc signed aad ccaificd for accuracy by Oe peroittcc ia accord witb the
following critcria:
a) In tbc case of corporations, by a priacipal cxccutivc officcr of at lcast thc lcvcl of vicc-prcsidcnt or his or
her duly authorizcd rcprcscDtativc, if such reprcscntarivc is responsible for the ovenll operation of lhe
faciliry from which the discbargc dcscribcd ia thc form origioatcs;
b) ln the casc ofa pannership, by a gcncral partncr;
c) [u Oe casc of a rclc proprietochip, by thc propriaor;
' d) tn the case ofa municipal, state, or otbcr public facility, by eitber a priacipal cxecutive of,ficcr, ranking
clectcd official, or otbcr duly autborizcd cmploycc.
Within sixty (60) days of ccrtification thc pcrmiucc shall file a statemcnt with the Environmental
Protection Agency aod tbc Watcr Qudity Control Division which shall conain thc names of thc penion or
persons who are dcsigoatcd to report conditious on discbarge Eouil,oring reporb 8Dd as noted in
"Noncompliaocc Notificatioo", Part II A.3. Thc pc.rmittec sball continually updatc this list as changcs
occur at tbe faciliw.
o
PART II
Page 12
PERMIT
NO.: COG470000
o
PART tr
Page 13
PERMIT
rl. RESPONSIBILfiES
l. Insoeclioos and Rieht to Entrv
The pcrmieee shall allow the Director of thc Statc Water Quatity Control Dvisiou, tbc EPA Regioual
Administrator, atrd/or their authorizcd nepr€scotative, upoo tbe pr€scntatioD of crcdentials:
a) To eutcr upon the pcrmiucc's premiscs whcrc a rgulatcd facility or activity is locatcd or in wbich any
records are required to be kept under lhc tcrms atrd conditions of this permit;
b) At r€asonablc times to have acccss to atrd copy any records required to be kept utrdcr the lerms aDd
conditions of this permit and to inspect aay monitoring equipment or monitoring method required in the
permit; and
c) To cntcr upon thc pcrminec's premiscs to iavcstigatc, witbin rcason, any actual, suspected, or potcntial
courcc of watcr pollution, or any violation of tbc Colorado Walcr Qudiry Control Act. Tbc invxtigation
' Eay includc, but is uot limitcd o, rhe following: sa-mpliag of auy discharge and/or proccss watcrs, lhe
tntring of photographs, intcrvicwiag pcrmiucc Etaff oo dlcgcd violation, scccss to any and all facilitics or
i1p35 v/ithin the perminec's prcmiscs that may havc eoy afrec1 on the discharge, permit, or allcged
violation.
2. Dutv to Provide Information
The permitrcc shall ftrruish to thc Divisioa, within a reasouable time, any informatioa which thc Division may
r€quest ro detcrmioe uAerber causc cxists for oodifying, revoking and reissuing, or tcrminatitrg this permit, or
lo dcrcrnine compliaacc with tbis pcrmit. Thc pcrmittcc shall also furnish to tbe Division, upoD r€qucst, copies
of records required to be kept by this pcrmit.
3. Transfcr of Ournersbio or Control
A pcrmit may be transferred to a trcw pcrmincc if:
a) The current permittee notifies tlc Division in writiug 3O days in advance of the proposed transfer date;
and
b) Tbc noticc includes a wrincn 8grecsrent bctwccn tbe cxisting and new permittccs coutaining a spccific date
for transfer of pcrmit respoosibility, coverage and liability bctween them; and
c) Tbc current permittee has met all fec requircmeDts of the Statc Discharge Permit System Regulations,
Scction 6.16.0.
4. Availabiliw of Reoorts
Exccpt for data determined to bc confidential undcr Scction 3OE of thc Fcdcral Clean Water Act atrd
Rcgulations for tbe Statc Dscharge Permit Systeo 6.6.4 (2), all reports prepared in accordarce with the Grms
of this pcrmit sball be available for public inspcction at Oe officcs of the State Water Quality Control Division
and thc Regional Administrator.
o
PART tr
Page 14
PERMIT NO.: COG{70000
B. RESPONSIBILTTIES (CONTINUED)
5. Modification. Suspcnsion. or Revoqation of Pcrmits Bv tbc Division
All permit modificatiou, tcrmistion or rcvocstion and reissuaacc actions shall bc subject to the requircmeots of
the State Discharge PerEit Systcm Regulations, scctions 6.6,2,6.6.3,6.E.0 ad 6.16.0, 5 C,C.R. lOO2-2,
cxcePt for minor modificatioos. Minor modifications may only corrcct typographical errors, requile a changc
in thc frcquency of monitorhg or rcporting by lhe pcrmiucc, changc aa iarerim &tc in a schcdulc of
compliaucc or allow for a changc in owucrship or opcrational control of a facility ircluding addition,
dcactivation or docation of dischargc points whcre thc Dvision daermitrcs that no other change ia lhc pcrmit
is neccssary.
a) This permit may be modificd, suspeDded, or tcvokcd ia wholc or il part during its tero for reaso1s
detcmined by tbe Division including but not limited ro, the followiag:
(i) Violation of any tcrms or conditions of thc permit;
(ii) gbr'ining a permit by misrcprcscltation or failing to disclosc any facr rryhich is mstcrial to thc
grantiag or deoial of a pcmdt or to thc cstablishmcnt of tcrms or conditions of the perait;. or
(iii) Materially falsc or ioaccurzrc shtcEents or iaformation ia tbc appucatioa for thc pcrmit; or
(iv) homulgation of a toxic cfflucnt stardards or prohibitions (including any schcdulc of compliancc
spccified in such effluent staodard or prohibition) which are established under Secrion 307 of rhe
Cleen Watcr Act, wherc such a toxic pollutant is prcscnt in tbc dischargc aud such st8rdard or
prohibition is morc stringcnt thau aay limitation for such pollutant in this permit.
This permit may be modified in wbole or in part due to a change in aay condition that requires ei&er a
tcmporary or permancDt rcduction or climinatioo of thc permitted discharge, such as:
C) Promulgation of Watcr Quality Statrdards applicable !o waters affectcd by the permitted discbarge; or
(ii) Effluent limitations or other requirements applicable pusuaut to the State Act or federal
requ ircments; or
(iii) Control rcgulations promulgated; or
(iv) Data submined pursuaot to Pert I.B indicates a potential for violation of adopred Water euality
StaDdards or stread classifications.
Tbe certification for the individual facility authoriziug discharge under the general glermit may be modified
to allow for a change in orvncrship or opcratiotral cootml of a facility including 8ddiriotr, dcactivation or
rclocation of discharge points where thc Division detcrmiocs no cbange in the general permit is nec€ssary.
At lhe rcquest of tbe pcrmince, tbe Division may modi$, or tcrmiDat€ this permit if the followilg
couditions arc met:
(i) ln the case of termination, the perminee uotifies the Division of its intent to terminate the permit 90
days prior.to the desired datc of terminatioo;
i
b)
c)
d)
PART tr
Page 15
PERMIT NO.: COG470000
B. RESPONSTBIUTTES (CONTTNUED)
' (ii) In the casc of tcrminarion, thc peroiucc has ccased any and all dischargcs to stalc witcrs strd
demoDstratcs io tbe Division thcrc is no probability of furthcr uDcontroiled dischargc{s) ufiich may
affec't waters of the State.
(iii) The Rcgional Administraror hes been notified of thc proposcd modification o, tr.rio.tioo and docs
nor objcct iu writing wirhh rhirty (30) &ys of racipt of uotification;
(iv) The Dvision fuds that &c pcrmificc has shbwn reasonable grounds coDsisrent wi& tbe Federal and
Srarc staliltes and rcgutations for such modification, aoendment or tcrminrtisl.
(v) Fcc requirements of Scctioo 6.16.0 of Statc Dischargc Permit Systcm Regulations havc becn met;
and
(vi) Rcquircmcnts of public aoticc hsvc bcca md.
6. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liabitiw
Nothing ia this pc-rmit shall bc constnrcd to precludc thc institution of any tcgal action or relicvc thc permittec
from any responsibilities, liabilitics, or pcaaltics to uAich thc permittcc ii or nay bc subject to undcr section3ll (oil and Hazardous Substancc Uability) of rbe Clcan Warcr Aa.
7 . State [-aws
Nothiug in lhis pc_rait sbstl bc construed to precludc thc iastitution of aay legal action or relicve thc pcrnittec
from any responsibilitics, liabilitics, or pcnalties cstablishcd pursusrt to any applicable Statc law or regulationuudcr authority grantcd by Scction 510 of tbe Clcan Waar Act.
8. Permit Violations
Failurc to comply with sny tcnos aud/or conditiors of this pcrmit shau bc a violation of this pcrrrit.
9. Pmocrtv Rishrs
Thc issuance of this permit locs no1 convcy any propcrfy or warcr rights in cithcr real or pcrsonal properry, orstream flows, or any cxclusivc privilcges, nor docs it authorizc *y i"luty to privatc property or any invasioa ofpcrsonal rights, nor any infringcoeat of Fcderal, State or local taurc oi regulations. -
10. Sevcrabilitv
The provisions of this pcrmit arc scvcrable. If any provisions of this permit, or the application ofany provisionof lhis pcrmit to aDy circumsr'rcc, is hcld invalid, tbc application of such provisiotr b;ther circumstaaces and
tbe applicatioa of thc reoaindcr of rhis pcrmit shalt aot bc affcctcd.
I l. Renewal Aoolication
If the permittcc desires to contiouc to discbarge a permit rencwal application shall be submittcd at lg:|st otre
hundred cighry (180) days bcfore this pcrmit expires. If tbc pcrmittee anticipares thcre will be no discbarge
afrer the expiration date of this pcrmit, the Division should bc pronptly notified Eo that it can rermiaate the
permit in accordancc with P8rt tr.8.5.
PART tr
Page 16
PERMIT NO.: COG470000
B. RESPONSIBILMIES (CONTINUED)
I2. cotfideptjelily
Any information relating to 8ny secrcl proc€ss, method of manufacture or production, or sales Lr markaiug
data, which may bc acquLed, asccrtaincd, or discovcrcd, whether in any sampling invcstigatioo, emergeucy
invcstigation, or otherwise, sball not bc publicly discloscd by any mcmbcr, ofhccr, or cmploycc of thc
commission or the Division, but shall be kept confidentid. Any pcrson secking to iavoke thc protection of this
Subsectioo (2) shall bcar thc burden of proviog its applicability. Tbis scction shall acver be interpraed as
preventing full disclosure of cffluent data.
13. Fecs
The pcrmiuce is requircd to submit payncnt snd rnnual fcc ss sct forth in &c 1983 arnendoents to the Water
Qudity Control Act. Section 25-8-502 0) (b), and Sarc Dscharge Permit Regulations 5CCR 1002-2, Section
6.16.0 rs amcnded. Failurc to submit tbe requircd foc ufrcn duc and payablc is a violation of tbe permit and
will result in cnforccmcot aaioo pursuant to Scclion 25-8-ffl d. scq., C.R.S. 1973 as amcnded.
14. Rcouirine aa Individual CDPS Pcrmit
Tbc Dirccor may requirc any owncr or operator covcrcd uadcr lhis peroit to apply for and obtaio aa individual
CDPS permit if:
a) Thc discharger is not in compliancc with the couditions of this Gencral Permit; or,
b) Conditions or statrdards bavc chaaged 60 thal thc dischargc ao longer qualifics for e General Permit.
c) Data bccomes available which indicates watcr qr.rality sta[dards may bc violatcd,
The owner or operator Eust bc Dotified i.n writing that an application for atr iadividual CDPS pcrmit is
rcquired. Wben an individual CDPS permit is issucd to atr owuer or operator othcrwisc covered under this
Gcueral Pcrmit, the applicability of the Gcneral Pcrmit to tbat owncr or opcrator is 8ur;Eatically terminatcd
upon thc cffective date of thc individual CDPS pcrmit.
15. Reouestine an Individual CDPS Permit
Any owner or opcrator covered by tbis Geaeral Pcrmit may rcquest to be cxcluded from the coverage by
applyiug for an i:rdividual CDPS Peroit.
16. Reouestins Cover?se Under the General Permit
Tbe owncr or opcrator of a facility cxcluded from covcragc by this General Pcrmit solely bccause that facility
already bas an individual permit may request tbat the iodividual permit be revoked and that the facility be
covered by rhis General Peroit. Such request shall bc cvduatcd by tbe Divisiou pcr criterioa specified i! Part I
of Ois pe rmit.
o
l-r.l
E.t!
oo
t+ t-lQZ-
o-5<J>fo
|lJFITJE=(9>=dooE
LL>(D
lllJ| | tE
,l>l sY
E*t 1tZ Y | ,.,?3s?O'I<()ooov)
o<Za-out-
CE t-.1lll FtUlZa(tzu9r
cc<otlJ_@oF+ o
a@o-5NcJ t
+=sq6oY;.rr otZ.;ixH5
ri
-l
;)
U
l{ irl I
trdt\r5i
)litIqI4tiF
,';'
Ii,
WJ
i
r.)
'::;;! i,d
, ;':!oJECr
PACE 17
i
Jlrt<I>t-,z
E,_oolr-ZrO
LoYt,t.n6
tllOt-E6oo*-fiQ
IJ'_ E 0.( -rur oJ(J>Je<oo
TL|.t-(J()
llllItl
c#{dq q"ll
zY-?fis?EI<Oo(Jo(n
o<zo
-Oui-(f t-r
IIJ F
Lll =
=a(tzuHl
CE<OF-r--Pi;N
-.\@o-f N<-: r
F=o.g6.9eA a-z;
=xHo
UJJ
()a
o
F-
F-oz
4
Corared Bridges Building Limiled
C O,\ S?'R U CTI ON D EWATERI NG P ROJ E CT
coG470122
PAGE 18
z
Pa
EHa'nOJ(J=
?gt1
gfi
.F
-QHJ>50
olrjIY
Itl
o(J
FIGURE 2
l:,z
)
=o
trJoo
(D
frl9
HH
6O
V=
8h
uJo
= lrlF(L
o
tt-
==o-
6o
)J
ILl-
o
(
\
:ilttrt I
,t_, I:
ht Ici(9\
RENEWAL OF
CONSTRU CII ON D EWATEN NG
OPERANONS IN COI,OMDO
GENERAL PERMTT FOR DISCHARGE
MNONAIE
cOLoRADo DISaHARGE PERMIT MJMBER: coG47M
Uodate
fiis is the seotd rcnaw,l oJ the gcncral pamit for C.onstrrrcTbn Derwtcriag Opcratiotts r+hich was originally ksued
Novembcr 2, 1983.
Thc Gcaeral Pcrmit gtstcnt for regulathg disclurga fiom thc construction opcraliorlt has workcd wcll for thc State.
Thc nlost signiflcant changa ia the sccond rcnawl arc aJ Iollov,s:
A. Thc Divkion l:as reasonable concerrlt with corctruction dewatcring sita ncar areas with potenfial groundwuer
pollutants conributd by lcaking underground ii6ragc rank, ladflt arcas, surfacc ground contatninotion Jrom
gasolinc and diacl spilk, chonical dumping arnr:t. etc. Groutdwarcr charactcrktics ond movcnunt may change
because oJ e:rcavation atd grourd*aner pw4oing rctivities. In somc cdtes thc cotzstruction dcwatcring areas may
indicatc a potcuial problan wirt groudvntcr pllutat* cncring iruo hc sitc afcr acavaion as a raul! oJ pumping.
Additiondl monitoring shouU aid ia cwluathg possibh dnnges in groutd',+vter conditiotts during the pumping
activiry, hsuriag tlut the cotditbns oJ the gaural pamit qe wld, and aho irdicatc if a situuion es,ists whcrc an
individual pcnnit should be bsued This requirenuu witl be imposcd wherc thc potcuial for problems exist.
B. Additional nonitoring nuy be rcquntd to cuurc tlu the antidcgrdddtion prcsumption is overcomc by sitc specifc
rcasons specifed in Scction 3.1.8(I)(c)(ilGi)(iii) of The Basic Standard.s and Methodoloeies for Surface Water, as
furrtcr aplai4cd in Pan I.C.7.B of thc permit.
C. The oddition of phosphons (as P) nonitoriag Jor Jrcilities whbh discharye hto drainage basins that have phosphorus
nonitoring and reponing requircnznts and for drainage basins thaL,uy lancr becone areas Jor phosphorus
monitoriag, as funher e:plaincd in Pan I. C.7.C. . of thc pcrmit-
D. Thc daily naxbrurm swpended solid.s limitation of @ mgll shall no longer apply. The suspended solids limitation of 30
mg/l; 30-Day Averagc and,45 mg/l;7-Day Averagc, shall apply 6 pcr rhc Srate Efrlueu Regulatiors Secrion
10.1.4.(l). Thc dejnitions of 30 day ad 7 day avcragt climinue thc need for a daily maimtnz-
Reauthorizdtion
Pan I.A.I of the pcrmit spccifcs tlut authorkatbn to discharge urder this gcneral pcrmit wiII cxpire on September 30,
1998, thus Jacilities wbhing couinual covdrage under this pcrmit trutst rcapply by April I, 1998.
' Robcn Cribbs
January Il,1993
o
RENET{AI, OF
CONS IRUCTIOI{ D EX.IATERING
OPIRATIONS IN COI'RADO
GENERAL PERhIT FOR DISCHARGE
R.ATIONALE
COLOR.ADO DISCHARGE PERMIT NI,UBR.: COG-OTOOOO
Upda ce
This is for renegal of the general perolt for Coostructloo Deirateriog
Operatlons ritr i ch vas orlgloally issued Novenber 2, L983.
The General Pernit 6ysteo for regulating dlscharges froo the construction
oPerations has worked rlell for the State. In the past discharges fron oll andgasoline Sroundwater cleao-ups have beeo included uuder this geaeral perDit.After a review of thi6 procedure a decisioa. was oade to discongiuue this
allowance. Such facillties do ooq fall under the defiDltion of Coost:ructLon
Dewateriog operatioos aud thus cao oot be regulated under this perruit.
Most of the other conditioos of the orlglnal peruit and ratlooale are stillapplicable, a copy is attached for reference. The oost slgnificant change isthat of the defioltloo of the 30 day average liuitatiou for total- suspendedsolids. Ihe previous peroit used a defioition based upon the oean of aoloiouo of three saoples nbile the ses deflaltloo ls the Deao of all saoplescollected. rtre sigolficaoce of .thls chaoge ls that if ouly one sanple ii
collected iu a oooth, coopliaoce iri th the 30 ug/l liEj.r 1s required.
Reau tb or 1za t i on
Part .I.A.1 of che pernit specifies that authorlzacioo to discharge under rhisgeneral peroit will erpire on Septeober 30, 1993, thus faciliEi.es erishing
coatiaual coverage under this peroit oust reapply by April I, 1993.
Pa tricia Nelsoo
Maureeo Drdley
Juae 15, 19BB
Public I'lotic e CoEoloen ts
Thls percit, as origlnally public DoElced on July 15, 1988, coDtaioedllnitations aod oonitoriog requireoents for oil and gas grouudwater clean-upoperatioos. EPA comoeoted that lnclusloa of such clean-ups r.ras beyood the
scope of this general pernit. After revies the Divisiou concluded that this
nas true. Thus the geoeral pereit has been revised; the requireoeuts for
clean"up operatioos currently cerEifled uoder this general sill be converted
to iodividual pernits durlug the recertificatloo stage.
Pacrlcla Ne lson
August 17, 1988
)
I
\
.t
-.
-
CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING
OPERATIONS IN COLOMDO
CENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGE
MTIONALE
COITRADO DISCITARGE PERMIT NWBER: COG-O7O0OO
Excavation dewatering ln conjunctlon sith constructlon activlties often resultsin teEPorary dischargea to eeters of the unlEed sEates. These dlscharges aresubject Eo Ehe requlreoencs 25-g-l0t ec. seq., cRs, 1973 as aoended. obcaininga discharge permlt oay be esseotlar to che "onscrrr"tlon actlvlty and rcsschedullng. Aduinlsrrative delays ln the lssuance of a perort olghtelgnificantly lnpact the clolng and cosc of a project. Sltuatloos have arisenln che pasc where perolt processrng delays, or anticlpation of derays, haveresulted in apprrcancs discharglng prlor to receipt of authorrzatr.oo. Theintent of a General Peruit for-cois lruc tion de!,ar€rlng 1s ro. facllitate thescheduling of chese activlEle6 by reduclng the adninliErarlve delays in theirauthorization' to estabrish . ,r.rlfo* criteria for uanagenen! practlces andeffluent llnitatrons for discharges fron these accivitles, and pro'ote aconsisEent PerEiEting and enforcetrent posture wlch respect to these actlvltles.
The General Peroit regulatlons provide for the issuance of General pemltswhere covered facL ll t ies:
1. are involved in substantlally the same cype of operarionsl
?. discharge rhe saue type of ,"".";
1' require che same effluent liEicatlons or operatlng condltioDs;
!. require sinllar Donltorlng; and,5. are Eore appropriately controlled under a General per'rt thanlndivldual per:oits.
Appl icabili rv
Thls category' 'constructlon deuacering-, will lnclude dewatering fron bulldlngconstrucEl.n, general constructlon, hlghway, brldge and tunnel construccion,aBong others considered approprlate by the Divlsion. The devacering associatedwlth chis conscructlon actlvrty wlll Le relatrvery shorr-teru and wirl notinclude any pollutancs other chan chose whlch normar physlcar disturbance,punping, or construcclon actlvity olghc creaEe. overburden retrovar is notconsidered a. construcclon activity. The Division retains the authority toindivldually perruic facillties deierraloed co be in noncoopllance rrith rheconditlons of this General perult or noE qualifying for a Generar pennit, (seePART II, B. 5, page 13 of che peroir)
-l
MTIONALE - page 2
Perolt No: C0c-070000
Coverage Under This Pern i t
An applicant r.tishing to discharge under the general perroic nust first suipfy
background informacion on che activity. The perolt provldes thlrry (30) daysfor the Division co deny discharge authorlzation or request addit.ional
l nfo rua t io n.
' This permit does not consElEute authorizatlon under Ehe provisions of 33 U.S.C.
1344 (Seccion 404 of che Clean l{ater Act), of any slreao dredging or filling.'
oPera c ions .
The following list shoss soue of the crlteria under shlch an lndlvidual pertric
uay be required lnstead of a general peroic.
1. Proxioity of che operacion to a landflll or srlne and oill taillngs;
2. Evidence of non-coopliance under a previous peroit for the operation;
3. Presence of dor.mstrean drinking uater intakes;
4. Preservarion of high qualicy water;
5. Addicion of tlocculants (settling agencs or cheolcal additives) to waterprior !o discharge.
6. Tlre use of land application as.a neans of discharge.
7. The bulk storege or use of chemicals on sice thac could be discharged
through the conscruction deeaterLng operation.
Peruic Rationale
The ormer, operaEor and/or auchorlzed agenc for a facillty desiring co
discharge shaIl subuit an applicatlon as provided by che l,later Quality Control
Division. This application rrill be evaluaced. If the general peroit is
applicable to Ehe operaEion, then a rationale will be developed and the
facillcy will be cerEified under the general pemlt.
MTI0NAIE - Page 3
Peralt No: COG-O7O0OO
The certlflcaclon racionale sball lnclude at a miniouo the nade and address of
che contacE person, a discussion of coopliance under the previous peroic-, 1f
applicable, the receiving t.rarer for che discharge, number of discharge polnts'
a deEeroinaclon of che need for salinity Eonicoring and the explration date of
the general petoit certiflcarion for the speclfic facilicy.
If afrer evaluatlon of the applicatlon, it ls found that the general Penolt is
not applicable to the operatlon, then che application gill be processed as an
tndividual perolt. For an individual per:olc, up to 180 days ui1l be requlred
co process the appllcation and issue the perolt. In this case dlscharge cannot
take place untll the Peruit ls issued and becones effectlve.
The general perult ltself r.r11l contaln the effluent liEltations and the
' Eon{torlng requlreoenCs for the peruiCted discharge points. The follor.rlng Cext
detalls the racLonale for the condltlons of the genelal perolt.
Effluent LiDltations Crit eri a
The follosing table presenCs a cooparison of effluent linitations based upon
State Effluen! standards (sEs) and Water Qrallty Standards (l'lQs):
sEs !!g
Total Suspended Solids, ug/l 30145
oil and Grease, rng/I I0
pH, s.u. 6.0-9.0 6'5-9'0
Sallnity
Effluent llolrarions in che general perrnlc are based on che sel€ction of che
oosC stringent lioilafions Presented in fhe above table. The Peroit
Conditions section chat follons discusses the lioitations for each Paraueter.
Perult Conditions
The principal pollucancs of concern ln consErucEion dewacering are:
1. Sedioents (Tocal Suspended Solids);
2. Oil and Grease (frou puups or exEraneous sources); and,
3. Mded flocculents or cheroicals co asslsc ln seccling.
t
MTIONALE - Page 4
Pernir No: C0c-070000
Total Suspended Solids
In the absence of.grooulgated Federal BAT, BCT or BPT linitaLlons, che State is
required co place State Effluent Linicarions in this Pernit. For TSS these
linlratLons are 30 rng/I for a 30 day average and. 45 tq/l for the 7 day average
Iinication. It should be poinced ouE that operations covered under this perEir
prioarlly control runoff in a oanner sioilar to sand and gravel, and coal
ninlng operatlons. Setcling of suspended naterlal would be rapid and nuch like
dlsturbed grouod nater associated wich a sand and gravel oPeration. The
Dlvlslon has found general coopllance lJtch the 30/45 TSS liuitations for sand
and gravel minl.ug facllltles shich are properly operated.
Data are avallable for tno construcCion dewaCerlng oPerations. These data shov
the following:
3O-Day Average
Arithoecic Hean
Thus, it appears that TSS lioits ot 30/45 are appropriate. With the linited
data available, the application of nore sEringenc linits is inappropriate.
For the purpose of facilitating conpliance oonitoring activities' a daily
oaxiuum llnltaclon of. 5O ag/L has been sec. Honitoring shall be specified as
twice uonthly. This should be adequaEe to ProcEcE water quallty.
oil anil Grease
OiI and Grease uay be present in Che discharge as the result of puop lubricant
contaoinacion or conEaoinated extraneous runoff enterlng the discharge. A
lioltation of 10 ng/l for Oil and Grease is recoooended based on the Colorado
Regulacions for Effluent Lirlitations. This level can generally be attalned by
convenllonal oil skionlng nethods or a suboerged overflos. Further, at l0 ug/I
of Oil and Grease a vlslble sheen nornally becooes evident. Monitoring shall
be weekly for 0i1 and Grease.
E
The pH range of 6.5-9.0 for slate water quality standards (WQS) ls Che effluent
Iirnitation appropriate for this pertrit. Though some streaE segrnents in the
slate have a WQS of 5.0-9.0, a sufficient nurober of streaos have the ruore
scringenr linitation of 6.5-9.0 Ehus warranting ioposition of this liaitation.
llacers nornally encouncered are aE a pH of 7.0-8.0. Natural surface and
groundwaters in a few locations ln che scate will not bd ttithin these liroits
and a facility at such a locaclon will very likely be considered an abnornal
operation and therefore required to obtain an individual penolt.
FIor,,
Flor.r nonitoring will be requlred under this penoit. FIow voluoes will be
5.98
Dal.ly Maximua
36.18
ta
MTIONALE - Page 5
Pernic No: COG-p70000
.deternined by punp rate or other nethods. chac che Division finds accept'able.
The frequency of flow ooniloring is discussed in the body of the pertrit..- Theretrill be no lioiraclon on the flow volurue discharged under the general peroit.
Flocculants
Because of a side variety of available chenical flocculanEs, the use of such
seEtling aids ousc be subject to prior approval by the permic issuingeuchorLcy. However, since line and aluru are che Eost frequenEly used aids for
setcling and typlcally their use results in no slgniflcant effect on otherpollutanc parabeters, pernl.ssion for thelr use uill not be required.
Salinlty
Sallnicy, Tolal Dissolved Solids (TDS) is an issue in the Colorado River Basin
r.rhi ch trarranCs sotre discusslon.
RegulaEion 3.10.0, Regulaclons for Inplernentation of the Colorado RiverSalinity Scandards Through che Colorado Discharge Perult Prograo addresses thedischarge of salinity to che Colorado River Basln. It is a requlreuent of theregulaclon that che saLlnity of each discharge in the Colorado River Basin be
evaluated for impacc on the syscetr. Generally, the neE inpact on sallnity cothe basin froo consEruction deuacering is negli.gible because che waters arecypically shallos grounduaters shich eventually reach the river. Nonetheless,the state reserves the righc to refuse che appllcablltty under the general
discharge pernit of any constructlon deuaterlng operation, if ir appears thatthe discharge rill not be consiscent uith regulacions. Addltionally, guarterly
ruonicoring for sallniEy uil1 be a peroit requireoent for a1l facllities locacedin the colorado River Basln. Should rhe daca identify a probleo, the stateo'il] have the righc to require rhe faciricy to obrain an individual pernlt,
whereby a study addressing the econorqic feaslbility of salt reooval can berequired. The certificatlon ratlooale thar acconpanies the pemic sha1linclude the Divislonrs determlnatlon of vhether or not salinlcy oonicorlng isrequired.
Monitoring Requireoencs
Monitorlng r:ill be required of each activity resultlng in a discharge. Theroonicoring frequencies are stated on page 5 of the pernit. Because Eost
discharges are of short dura!ion, frequent moniEoring is necessary co decernine
changes in che qualiry of che discharge.
SpiIl Concainment
As Dost facillcies provide bulk storage of sooe volune of petroleun products or
ocher chetricals, the peroic r.ri 1l require adequace procection fron spilrs for
such facilities so as to prevent loss of rhese uraterials into dischargedrtacers. such procection can take various foms, houever diklng in most caseswill prove ro be the Dost cosc effective. Thi.s provision is required as the
Divlsion incerprecs proper operation, as properly addressing pocenEial
polluCant sources before probleos occur.
(O (o
MTIONALE - Page 6
Pernit No: COG-070000
Spill Containnenc (Continued)
Reporcs will only be requlred in cases of noncoopliance rrlth perDlt
conditions. The pernlttee wll1, however, be required to ual'ncain Lts records
for a period of three (3) years. Such records nill be subjecC co inspeccion by
EPA and/or che Warer Quality Control Divlsion.
Report ing Requirepents
The resulCs of saople uonl.torlog shall be reported once each year to the
Dlvision as discussed in Part I C (4) of the Peroit. Should the effluent
concaln concenErations of any paraEeCer in excess of PerEit llnltations, the
perEitEee shall notlfy the Divlsiou trlthln 5 days of becooing aware of the
slcuarlon. The perulttee.shall lnoediately notify the Dlvision of the
occurrence of any discharge or spill not covered by Che condltlons of the
perui E.
PeruiC Duration
The peroic shall not exceed five years in duratlon.
Other Conditions
The peroittee Eay add or uove discharge PolnEs under lhe authority of Che
general pertriC so long as the discharge polnts are associated nlth the saEe
consEructlon site and go to the saDe recelvlng streao.
Should the perElttee wish to discharge inCo a differenC stream' a requesC for
peroit nodificacion slll be requl'red
Should the perroiEtee wish to dlscharge fron another construcCion si'te, a new
appllcat.ion sill have to be subEiEted to the Dlvision.
\ '' .
{l ,o
RATIONAIE - Page 7
Perroit No: C0G-070000
Special Connenc
Uost const.ruccion acEivities are perforoed in a reasonably lioited area.
Certain accivities however cover slgnificanr areas of land i.e. selter line
construction, stream rechanneling, etc.
Pasc and present land use can be extreoely varled along rhe route i.e.
landfllls, old lagoons, etc. and nay severely iopact che local grounduater
quality. Though the discharges are of short duracion, voluoes can be extreoely
hlgh and of low quality. Additionally, the Division's experience has been chat
contraccors roust begin construction shortly after the contracEs have been let,
which ln turn Ieaves insufflcient tlEe for collection of necessary da!a and
permic issuance. Barrlng poor quallcy groundwater, lhese accivities fiE rrell
lnto thle general perolt cacegory.
To accooooda!e !hese types of acclvicies a specialized applicacion approach 1s
ln order as follows:
f) Penoi c applicaclon should be by che facility onner. A transfer of the
perrrit Eo che contractor can then be accoroplished, if they are co be
che responslble party.
2) A pre-applicaclon conference uith Ehe Division is essencial. This
r.'iII all.ow che Division an opportunity Eo idencify special data which
r.rill be necessary for a cooplete application. Special data ln general
ri11 consisc of groundwater analysls for C0D and specific conductlvicy
at specified disEances thioughout the acCivity area, possibly every
300 feer.
Should generaEed daUa identify probleu areas, either Ehe entire activity niIl
require an individual pertriE r.rhlch takes 180 days co obEain, or Ehe probleo
segEents will be excluded frou certificacion dnder che general perulc.
Jon C. Kubic
Donald H. SioPson
March 18, 1983
2.
FIL[ $EPY
Ann Flepetti, who lives at 1001 VailValley Drive, stated that she was very concerned
about what would happen at this site. She stated that she and her family were not
opposed to limited residential development (i.e. single fami$, duplex or
primary/secondary) but would hate to see anything more than that. She pointed out
that she lives in a duplex. She stated lhat she would not like to see a pocket park on
the property.
Jim Curnutte responded that the requesled change to the Low Density Residential
designation would limit future construction to either one duplex, one primary/secondary
or one single family structure.
Dalton Williams felt that there was no need for additional park space in this area' He
said that residential use for this site seemed to make the most sense. He stated that
he would like to see all equipment from the former water treatment plant identified and
removed from the property.
Pat Dauphinais stated that with regard to the removal of whatever inlrastructure was in
place, that it may be easier to leave certain elements in place as opposed to tearing
up the entire site.
Jim Curnutte suggested that a sub-surface invenlory be conducted and then they could
determine what would need to be removed.
Jeff Bowen stated that because the site was triangular, he felt that a single lamily
residence would be the most appropriate option for this site.
Bob Armour felt that a sub-surface inventory would be a good idea. He did not feel
that there was a need for another park on this site. He felt that this site would be a
good buffer between the residential area and the park that surrounds it. He agreed
with Jeff's comment regarding the future zoning and said that we may want to consider
restricting the GRFA on the property.
Bill Anderson and Greg Amsden agreed with the other PEC members comments.
Greg also said that the sunounding topography creales a natural separation from Ford
Park.
Pat Dauphinais stated that they did not wanl the GRFA on the site restricted in any
way because this would directly affect the property's value. He pointed out that they
will most likely request Primary/Secondary zoning for the lot, not single family. He
stated that it is a perfectly buildable lot and the only restrictions should be as a result
of taking the future building through the Design Review Board review.
A review of the trash removal plan for a proposed colfee shop (restaurant), located in
theQomrd Blidge Euiklirg i at?27 Bridge StreeuLots C and D, and a part of Lot B,
Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: East West HospitalityPlanner: Mike Mollica
It should be noted that Jeff Bowen abstained from this request.
Planning and Envionmenlal Commission Meeling Minutes
october 24, 1994
_l
3.
Mike Mollica made a briel presentation per the staff memorandum.
Julie lverson, representing Covered Bridge Goffee, stated that they did not envision
that there would be excessive trash as a result of the proposed coffee shop. She
explained to the PEC what they anticipated the proposed contents would be.
Mike Staughton, manager of Russell's Restaurant, asked why the Gorsuch alley was
being proposed, as opposed to behind Pepi's.
Mike Mollica explained that here was no public right-of-way behind Pepi's building and
that the Covered Bridge Building was the only building in the Village without an
alleyway.
Peter Dann, of East West Partners, explained that there were limited options with
regards to the trash removal plan for the Covered Bridge Building.
Dalton Williams stated that if he had known a restaurant was going into the Covered
Bridge Building, he would have voted against the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge
Building. He felt that there should be a condition added that would restrict Covered
Bridge Coffee to the brewing of coffee only.
Julie lverson explained that since residential space was located two floors above
Covered Bridge Coffee that they were not allowed to cook any food and that this
restriction was in their lease.
Bob Armour and Bill Anderson were in lavor of the addition of Dalton's suggested
condition.
Dalton Williams made a motion to approve the trash removal plan for the proposed
Covered Bridge Coffee per the staff memo with the three conditions outlined on Page
2, with the additional condition that no on-site food preparation be allowed except for
the brewing of cotfee. Bill Anderson seconded the motion and a 4-0-1 vote approved
this request with Jeff Bowen abstaining from this item.
A request for a final update for the Main Vail Interchange Roundabout Landscaping
Proposal. The Town of Vail reques$ the Planning and Environmental Commission's
input on the cuceptual approach to landscaping the roundabout. Signage and lighting
plans will also be presented for discussion.
Applicant: Town Council, represented by the Vail Public Works Department and
Winston Associates, Inc.
Planner: Randy Stouder
Randy Stouder introduced the consultants, Leif Ourston and Paul Kuhn. He then
turned the floor over to Greg Hall, the Town Engineer.
Greg Hall gave a brief history of the Main Vail Interchange and the process that had
led to the proposal of the Roundabout concept ol the four-way stop. He stated that the
main issues were signage, lighting, landscaping and traffic flow.
Planning snd Environmental Commission M€ding Minutes
October 24, 1994
i
, Rolo.4 z ,f c* f =
/, t ,,"-X n.tr, ,)
\f
t. L7b"6ff'":
R"..a',** t U/,1;
= 2,51b
o.84
gx 'l5,om
# 12, boo.ot
btl
ll
II
.lt_ -_
I
I
I :',i1,A
- t .:fe ,?2c,a':t Ei
\-1J/ l-l V
F!!- t COP Y
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
October 24,1994
A review of the trash removal plan for a proposed coffee Shop (restaurant),
located in the Covered Bridge Building, aI227 Bridge StreeULots C and D, and
a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: East West Hospitality
Planner: Mike Mollica
I. BACKGROUND AND DESCBIPTION OF THE REOUEST
On March 14, 1994, the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) approved a request
for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge
Building. The PEC approval carried with it eight conditions. lt is two of those conditions that
involve further review by the PEC today.
Condition No. 7 of the PEC approval stated that "no motorized vehicle be allowed lo use
Bridge Street for trash removal." Condition No. I stated that "the PEC would need to review
the addition of a restaurant as tenant space and its proposed trash removal plan."
The Covered Bridge Building is currently under construction and one of lhe proposed tenants
is Covered Bridge Goffee, This is proposed to be an upscale espresso shop and full service
coffee bar, also seruing various pastries, (including muffins, bagels and croissants). The shop
would be approximately 488 square feet (gross) in size. Although lhere may be some debate
as to whether or not the PEC intended to classify a coffee shop as a "restaurant", the State
Health Department, as well as the Town of Vail's Environmental Health Department, does
classily this type of operation as a "reslaurant". lt is for this reason that the proposed
Covered Bridge Coffee is coming belore the PEC in order lor the trash removal plan to be
reviewed by the PEC, prior to the issuance of a building permit lor a tenant finish.
II. PROPOSED TBASH REMOVAL PLAN
The owners of Covered Bridge Coffee anticipate that over 857" ot what is sold in the espresso
shop will be "to go" and they also anticipate that the average weekly amount of trash
generated from this store will be approximately 80 gallons. The applicants are proposing to
use four 21-gallon containers to store their trash. Additionally, the applicants are proposing to
install recycle bins for plastic and aluminum and are intending to provide porcelain cups and
dishes for those customers wishing to sit inside.
The following information has been provided by the applicants, and is their analysis of the
proposed contents of their trash:
1. Trash located behind the counter:
.Paper cups;
.Plastic milk containers;
.Espresso grounds (dry);
.Aluminum foil.
2. Public/customer area:
.Paper cups;
.Sugar Packets;
.Napkins;
.Stir straws.
The above information has been reviewed by Paul Reeves, the Town's Environmental Health
Officer, and Paul believes that the applicant's estimales ol trash quantities are accurate.
Trash generated from Covered Bridge Cotfee will be moved (on a daily basis) to the trash
room of the Covered Bridge Building, located at the lowest level and at the west end of the
building. East West Hospitality has estimated that trash for the entire building will be picked-
up approximately three days per week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday), and possibly four
days per week in the high season. The trash containers for the Covered Bridge Building will
be carried by hand, or by hand cart, to the alley on the east side ol the Gorsuch Building
(adjacent to Gore Creek Drive). East West Hospitality has agreed that no trash containers will
be left unattended in this location, and that the trash will only be brought lo this location
minutes before the trash truck arrives. This will be coordinated with BFI when trash pick-ups
occur on the adjacent properties (i.e. Creekside Building, Pepi's, etc.).
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation is for approval ol the applicant's trash removal plan for Covered
Bridge Coffee. We believe that the applicant's eslimates of their quantities of trash are
generally accurate and reasonable, and additionally, we feel that the overall trash removal
plan is acceptable. The staff would recommend the lollowing three conditions of approval:
1. That no trash container(s) be left unattended at the Gore Creek Drive/Gorsuch
alley location for any period of time.
2. That routine inspections will be performed by the Town's Environmental Health
Officer to ensure that the trash quantities and proposed disposal methods, as
presented in this memorandum, are in compliance.
3. That any spillage of trash during transportation to Gorsuch alley shall be
immediately cleaned-up by East West Hospitality.
c:\Dgc\ngmos\ra8h 1 0,24
-lst"*:
I
;fr&*.&-.
. "4, zryb 3- d..t*.h' .- -l " )-&*-;**1s
j;l{2g
r. t
T0: TOWN OF VAIL
FROM: COVERED BRJDGE COFFEE
RE: TRASHREMOVALPLAN
Covered Bridge Cofee will be an upscale espresso shop in the new Covered Bridge
Building. The goal ofthe store, at this location" is to draw the pedestrian offofBridge
Street and into the retail stores of the Covered Bridge Buildfurg. It will offer the luxury of
a qualrty drink while encouraging shoppers to linger in a comfortable atmosphere. The
store will also provide a valuable service for the thousands of skiers daily that cross the
Covered Bridge.
Covered Bridge Coffee will b0 a full service coffee bar. Wcwill dso be s€rving vadou
lnsnies, induding muf,Fns, bagels, and cmicsants. AII of thc food items wil be preparrd
pffsitc and will be scwed as take out itenrl. From our experience with other coffee
stores, we anticipate that over 85% of what we ssll will be "to gon, and the average
weekly trash for our store will be approximately 80 gallons (according to BFI this is
minimal). Following is a plaq outlined in detail, that should address any concems about
our trash.
WHAT IS TNOURTRASW
BEHINDCOUNTER.
Paper Cups
Plastic Milk Containers+
Espresso Grounds (dry)
Aluminum Foil*
OUTSIDE COUNTER (CUSTOMER).
Paper Cups**
Sugar Packets
Napkins
Stir Straws
* These items are recyclable and bins will be provided for plastic and aluminum. We have
spoken with We Recycle, on S. Frontage Road, which is open daily for drop off
We also have a procedure for compacting our milk containers which minimizes the space
they take up.
** Porcelain cups and dishes will be provided for those customers wishing to sit in the
store and enjoy their coffee, so no additiond trash will be produced by having seating.
'/ cf
/1nt 5 t-
ffin5n (cnlatu6
t ,"tz z K'l v"/
-"'-_"-'.\-/\/.\,1 --.5 \..
t- \t-
-
I
-
l
-l
-/-./
,/\ rtzo ,/', /'
\----
rrrrrar..l,trarvrrJ wvlllU l9t r>
v
ll.0/261a 0,1
ldnou l0lliI.l3svtt (3!Cgtcc2
35aV36ll
Squrrc Untouchrbli' Conrrlncrr
. 0uroble cnd cr6ck rgsitlrnt,
svfn ultder tou0h rndoor/ouldoor
condilions.
o Combina wilh contomporory X
colorod lopt tor function rnd
good looks.
. Swing tops, which k?ca rfssh
oul of 6i9ht !nd tunngt topi
!vrilrblo.
. Wolcone oddition lo hotel
lobbier, rhopping mclle,
rcrlroom6, r0ttturtnls cnd
snrck tress.
Routi Uitouclcblof Conlr inrrs
. 0ttcr tcms loughntts rs Squnre
Untouchcblo contajnrrs,
' Avtilrble with lunnel or
swing lops in !ccfnl gofor'6.
. Frt s|ma locolions rr Round
Untouchrble contsiners.
lhll Eound rnd Slim Jim.
Conlri'|cr|
Prdcct for tighl rpots.
'. Swing top lidr cv!ilrblo lo( Stim
Jim containrrr.
rll-- -r-.--
Bcioe, Blue, Brow_n, 0.'ry
€t6
35,?4
3568 l4Z" sq. x 24" h. ]9 Sr
oal. 5mE3ge rel:{. x 3{1 h. 50.sll_
-5008
_9p,c1-Q,cy
9ru!,-G,lt--
Beigo, 8rown, Gny
3!.40
31r0
35 60
| 5t.1{
4
-7938
0q.
t604 20,d" rq x l6X" h. Fit6 39!9,395S?67 rsy"-oir. Fir-.I947,3i46ttil zov.l x itri x lx' h Firs gi{0
-'esla.0a 20,," i I tr; 4y;"-i-iG isil-'rvs t8^ dia.
-
riuEollis Grcy
I
I--l 11.?2
22.78
4
24.88
13 02
3i?i 15" sq Fns 3568,3!Eg | 29,82
rl ,.
8rown, feel
,35
COLORADO. GEORGIA . NORTH CAROI-lNA . VIRGINIA. WASHINCTON
october 21,1994
Mr. Mike Mollica
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mike:
As of our latest discussion in regard to the trash removal for the Covered Bridge
Building, East West Partners, as managing partner for The Covered Bridge Building,
Ltd. Partners, will have a 90 gallon trash container wheeled to the back alley behind
Gorsuch/Slifer, Smith and Frampton office buildings. They, too, will remain there with
our representative until they dump into the BFI truck.
Sincerely,
Peter Dann
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
BeaverCreekoResort. l00EastThomasPlace .Drawcr2770. Avon,Colorado 81620. (303) 845-9200. FAX (303) 845-7205
EASTWnST HospIrRrtrY
"__r;6r
B e a v e r C r e e k@ ^RT$SguYfN
H,"- sr1 si Y "rni,l,.rlru\ Ut\'UtrvArL T0\l .\rvt""''TO:
ATTN:
FROU:
RE:
TOWN OF
UTKE }'OLLICA
EAsr wgsr HosPrrALrrv @
TRASH REITIOVAL PI.AN FOR THE COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
P.O. Box 5480 . Avon, CO 81620
(303) 949-5071 . Facsimile: (303\949-55'25
@Pr rted on recycled paper
DATE: SEPTEITIBER 30, L994
The Covered Bridge BuiJ-ding is requesting an approval for their
trash renoval plan in order to allow a coffee shop to^ lease a
portion of the lirst floor, as required by the Town of Vail during
initial building approval.
The Covered Bridge Building Coffee Shop, as it wilt be called will
have a maximum stating capicity of L2 persons. Coffee, cappuccino
and etc., will be prepared on !ite, while bagels and pastries are
delivered. In addition, there will be a snall deli center for
preparing sandwictres for take out.
AII garbage fron the coffee shop will be in a closed plastic bag
in a-garbige container with a lid. The trash containers will be
kept in the Covered aridge nuilding trash room with in the
building.
Trash will be picked up 3 days per week, tentatively !ton, Wed, Fri
and possibly 4 days per week in the hiqh season. East l{est
Hospitality Management Company will coordinate wj-th BFI to remove
the garbage from the Covered Bridge Building trash room by way of
Bridge Sfreet within the existing Town of Vail trash removal
schedule. If accessing the lower half of Bridge Street is not
acceptable to the Town of VaiI, the trash will be rolled up to Gore
creek Drive in containers and then picked up at an acceptable
location.
dir/;e/r*r-,
?47-2/?7
$iP 2 3 ,:E4
oo
EASTWEST HOSpnnrruv
-- // Beaver CreekoResort/ (-.)
{
,t-J u-) C'\,-
ltlV '0uivri'ii' Dt'\/' DtPtr'
Septenber 23, L994
Dear l{ike }lolLica:
The Covered Bridge Suilding reguests review and approval by the
P.E.C. of the Covered Bridge coffee shop trash removal plan.
lfe are targetlng the october 24th P.E.c. neeting. Please notifyus if thiE will not be possible.
Silryerely,
I/*
l,(w
Peter Dann
Covered Bridge Building Ltd.
PDlpf
P.O. Box 5480 . Avon, CO 81620
(303) 949-5071 . Facsimile: (303) 949-5526
@ Printed on rccycled pape,
Category Number l2-
Csign Review Action FO-
TOWN OF VAIL
Date /0'1b:14
Projecl Name:
Building Name:
Project Doscription:
Owner, Address and Phone:
4x,6@cona"t, Address and Phone: F ' , \ ,-/'-". '/o AP(' A:*.--t
Legal Desoiptiontysw 4c,b Bbck 5-8 Subdivision t4 _ ZoneDistrict cc}
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Motion by:
Board / Staff Action
Vote:
Seconded by:
n Approval
3 Disapproval
\(staff Approvat
Conditions:
14 ', klrL,-
DBB Fee Pre-paid # zo, o!
o
,rjt\|
_i
. 'nT
,; r,,-i l.}, r, I1u .: ' i "lr i'E'_lVI v,,'
RE:
1.
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
227 Bridge Street Vail, CO
Town of Vail, Department of Community Development
Mike Mollica, Senior Planner
1 1 1 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building
227 Bridge Street
Vail, CO
The following is a request for staff review of alterations to the above previously approved
project. The items presented are a result of field adjustments required during construction,
clarifications to DRB and Permit Drawings or errors discovered in the lmprovement
Location Certificate from Eagle Valley Survey dated 1Ol20l94.
Level Three- Penthouse Balcony at Bridge Street
Request is to accept the balcony as shown on the ILC having a dimension of 17'-1"
x 6'- 6".
The DRB and Permit drawings show a dimension width of 15'-7" but no depth
dimension is shown (the drawings scale 6'-6" from the door/glass line). An error
was discovered after steel was in place and concrete poured with snow melt
tubing, A field decision was made to simply reduce the railing to fit the original size
and leave the structure in place. '
Roof Plan- Penthouse Stair Roof
Request to accept reframing of roof over upper stair as shown on the ILC having a
ridge elevation of 8200.3 feet.'
The DRB and Permit drawings show a ridge along the East side of the upper stair to
the Level Five Master Bed. The steel floor and roof structure did not allow adequate
headroom above the top stair landing. A field decision was made to shift the ridge
to the middle of the stair and bring the valleys to the outside corners resulting in
higher ridge elevation but below the maximum allowable.
2,
Roof Plan- Flat Roof @ Master Bedroom
Request to accept the enlarged (approx 3'-0" x 11'-4"1 flat roof
the ILC @ elevation 8200.1'feet.
The DRB and Permit drawings show an undimensioned upper
elevation 8200.5'that scales 11'-4" x 24'-O". The structural
centered to the 1 1 '-4" dimension but as the roof detail shows
area as shown on
flat roof area @
steel beams were
the roof transition
3.
from flat to eloped aligned to the outside of the beam, The 3' extension is a r€sult
of a correction to th6 roof drainage. The East Elevation still remains as approved.
Thie represents th€ itsms brought to our att€ntion by the lLC, the Town Planner, and the
Contractor- to date. We hope thege items are minor in nature and that the original intent
of the approved proiect is intect.
Should the opinions or observations of others differ, please submit them in writing or call.
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY/PRATTISCHULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
Eric Johnson, Architoct
EJ/kc
,ts/,6'tL
IT
*.$
$s55
f
_t
dr
'o
=s*i
$$
I'
I
t
I
d'lei
1-$
T*
r!
rtrlF
I
v
I
-f-
tqll
tuh.E-
fJFJt4+
A h-l ; L/4rl
(*z{EF t
4?re?Qauree +zpqFYfWFLftdl
'#:wftP
?elw; p41s1lt@
r * ea-d77A=
I
L
fFnT 4t&
COVERED BBIDGE BUILDING
227 BRIDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO
AX.z+
q
^
/a4
r€vised 6/L8/9L
COLORADO
tolth/rlL
. .) ''1j u .\..
I.
DRB APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAIL,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
r'rs rPP't""tf;iTi#il, "" AccEPrEp
UNTII. }LI. REQUIRED INFORMAIION IS SUAMIITED
****t*t***
,, _ ;
DESCRIPTION:At*e,r{rtl-ir'.ii
TYPE OF REVIEW:
New construction ($200. OO) -KMinor Alteration (920 ' 00)
Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
D.
Subdivision
ADDRESS: zz--r ' Br-u*F Btv<r-:t-
LEGAL DESCRTPTTON: t'oX at zt? Block E'v
If property is described by a meets and bounds legal
Aestriptioi, please provide on a separate sheet and
attach to this aPPlication.
F.
ZONING:aol
LOT AREA: If required, aPPlicant
stamped survey showing fot area.
NAME OF APPLICANT:E>rt/ w.s
Mailing Address:
NAME OF
Mailing
must provide a current
Phone
APPLICANI, S REPRESENTATIVE :Cefu Ft,.t*+q*+
Address: tPo 9'
Phon
I.
J.
K.
NAME OF OWNERS:
*SIGNATURE (S) :
Mailing Address:
Phone
Condominium Approval if applicable '
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at
r.16 r-imo nf crrtrmiit.l of DRB applicaLion. Later, whenthe time of subrnittal of DRB applicat'ion'
id at
oQ- tit/4 ()s7
ippfylng for a building pernit, pJ-ease j'dentify the
uti"iut6 valuatlon of ine proposal. The Town of vail
wiII adjust the fee according to the table below' to
ensure ihe correct fee is Paid.
FEE SCHEDIJLE:@
r t'//.t
fQ /
90s 10,001
$ 50, ool
$150,001
s500,001I over
VALUATION
$ 10r 000
I 50,000s '150,000
$ 500,000
$1,000,000
$1r oo0r 00o
BE PROCESSED
FEE
$ 20 .00
$ s0.00
9100.00
$200.00
s400 .00
ss00.00
VTITEOUT OI{NER' S SIGNATURErNO APPLICATION TIILL
South
North
West
Town of Vail
11 1 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Pepi Gramshammer
Pepi Sports
231 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Dave Gorsuch
Gorsuch, Ltd.
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Ron Riley
Russell's Restaurant
228 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Rod Slifer
Slifer, Smith & FramPton
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Beth Slifer
Slifer Designs
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Chuck Rosenquist
Gore Creek Plaza
3777 Mt. Veder
Napa, CA 94558
East
il atlq+ -
ro/ b Iq4'
q{tPg-sI\,
sLrr art o I
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwillhold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the MunicipalCode of
the Town of Vail on October 24,1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
1. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed change to the Land Use Plan from
Park to Low Density Besidential (LDR) for a parcel owned by the Vail Valley
Consolidated Water District, located at 967 Vail Valley Drive/Tract C, VailVillage 7th
Filing.
Applicant: VailValley Consolidated Water District, represented by Pat Dauphanais
Planner: Jim Curnutte
A review of the trash removal plan for a proposed coffee shop (restaurant), located at
227 Bridge StreeVlots C and D, and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: East Wesl Hospitality
Planner: Mike Mollica
3. A request for a conceptual review meeting for the Main Vail Interchange Roundabout
Landscaping Proposal. The Town of Vail requests the Planning and Environmental
Commission's input on several conceptual approaches to landscaping the roundabout.
Applicant Town of Vail Public Works Department and Jeff WinstonMinston
Associates. lnc.Planner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for front and side setback variances lo allow for a new residence to be
located at 1788 Alpine DriveiLot 1'1, VailVillage West 1st Filing.
Applicant: Thomas TheysPlanner: Jim Curnutte
tign Review Action FQn
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Nrmber / 2 sab 7' 1' ?4
PrcpcaNamei C,v-e'"."-.I Bn':/4a T< ,''/ /' ir'/
Building Name: -
")
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone:tr^-, M^X fr'Ea^-t
@ffiii&Vec*ct, Address and Phone:
L€gal Description: Lot5l-!)- Block 5-B Subdivision ZoneDistrict c( 7
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motion by: 6 a-rz,--t Vote: -F- O
Seconded by: Uv/tl-i I
$neotou"t
! Disapproval
E StaffApproval
Conditions:
Town Planner
Date: ?, ?' 7+DRB Fee Pre-paid # za,o-e
e
AArre#-.,OK .6t -tt-.,-,r< ^","*t -4*-t*; 4 D 24
. .-r,, J./a &a-A-; +
?''1- ?4 ' Qrt'-J
T*t e- = .Jq Vf^*/ - /"%.^'r - 4J^r'/4 G\I- /^/2,-/1* b t.+z
Zd,_ fl*4
Vt{e, I A
n r=-fr2r=O r\ -= q;LETTIER (oF'f RANSMITTAL
WE ARE SENDING YOU XI Shop drawings
I Copy of letter
n
D
Attached
K
!
I Via
Prints/sepias
Change order
Plans
Originals
|z'o-) bVvr,.- rhe folowins lems:
Samples ! Specitications!
!
DATE t/Clq+ lroauo.ro: T.o.V.
Hit'- |.1o il,-+
RE; Avu -A bn;Jr- BIJ-
\l o
DATE NO,DESCRIPTION
I qA/q1 F6.. Plr^-s A r.4 ELtrrt* ..' A a.t
+/r /+ct"ttt"".-. EU^rt$:-. - Nlir.-{-.. + @+}itb
I q lr /q*qA^l;Al*Dzt?i t
THESE ARE TBANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval
For your use
As requested
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Fleturned for corrections
For your records
Revise and resubmit
For review and comment
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
!
!
!
tr
x
!
!
!
f
!
!
!
FOR BIDS DUE 19
La+ "'CRE[,,|ARKS
ll enclosurcs arc not as noted, kndly notily us al once.
Na rT!'+ =>r-_'tAT te;-t
l/4.rt
Cofrez1w4 -Q?AHaAFfil*
J Eae? UIHE
-,?1l) * Cto-7er:rnil)
.7P,7-Pv€f a*e ( rr )-
--l * ce ezt?t*b c-,tN,)(r'7e4 To flP1C1A, , I-ta aeeJe'z)
to a?t*-1 6a1p.rx).. ^-- | |t't ATa H
r -?r kPP
'&vEFeP p>Vrp@,
a)tuerr-lGe
-2T+te vq*l*];e;g=-
@e-.*aU e* ta11*t-)
-pena-\!^ -14.1 Aul.-_-l;tFl 6 -._
!xao
.' ,b?tD@a azt4e
AX.
t /w /q+
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
227 BNIDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO
vu!^ >/h el.WF FllHEDt^lt
.V . el l-t /.-_EJ?*I
; -Fl++trrHr--
;bor1e6
(4tD= €'rn)
6-tl Vo-zz\€u7? bJ /-
IELP<#,/ ,---
=.agu\lE? Fr#u
-TO *\aa4--:-+IlH?aA 6V?'
,FI$,EFb|;I]
''/ \.''.\
r , -\ | t tl I I I\Lo)-:/e. T(re | x,' toY7. eqfi*xss
\t
. 7r=
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
227 BRIDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO
\
o o
\-=oF-t
'iz HAflHEF-wYaA>\v
wvav F.V6
bl,- 1.1
4TAt? Llr
He?ft+ eUevATLG2*)
.-,*"W
I4e?ytce P@3.2, f
I l, .r^,l, r_F !r-;^ . ,. ^.t ,l -
ht/?11 _
tsMu
I
II
1l'
go'ftn
4V
:co?reJz?aF e
c2ltvua?
b1t-1ptr
A/ r>ir..rTEp HETAT.- AeLt+
Tproaw alHlweF Euc-t-abu?e -tht
Ax.
2A
qy'/q+
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
227 BRIDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO
l-
-'l
l1lJT-H/AFlE. 7p711-1-
? tn taATr lF{eJuh)'ffirrg by.
rr)e> 4 tH f7zq]-; of
-?EllltaFJ. vaprtf
FJE- aF-ff11;u7P,;si€|4lf, atAF*,a2
=W*g%H *re-tb!es,
fel
4.?,'
rH
(
\
-*-QrveetJ/e--_
t'/:rr.?tY1
I
,DR:-ewa.t_tr-a
t-ouTLtHE fr 3t-6ap-_ -
.hAaJ@ /t- dtt
-l -eawL)Hl+ -
c"TAl-LhTI,.atJ.
1/ t /q*
I' /""
ou6o
I
t
F
D
'lr
5
F
2cou
=lr,t
p
el$
nl-l
E"
IE
i>
o
2g
Et
Fe
,:ff
t
;E!ii
Ilr:F
()
troa-(,
IIE
UJ
?L
€EF
-o+,o
t?
-PooIoN
o
=ct
C,
I FEoIIotro
El-o
.lr,5
lrlo6
I!
5
I
s4$J
)
-2
=s-)
<;l.:ate revised 6/L8/91
DRB APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAIL'
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
ttt*aatt**
TIIIS APPLICATION IIII.L NOT BE ACCEPTED
rrN r r L Ar.r. REQU r Y* *t*Y*O*Rj':|t
r oN r s suBl'lr rrE D
Ct-i F\^r4€I{/ e1-
TYPE OF REVIEW:
I.
lhlg
H.
LOT AREA: If requi.red,
stamped survey showing
K.
FEE
$ 20 .00
$ 50.00
s100 .00
$200 .00
$400.00
$500 .00
}IITEOUI OI|NER' S SIGNATURE
r0
L
coLoRAPp'n 4y6 11tw
DESCRIPTION:
New construction ($200. O0) XMinor Alteration (S20 ' 00)
E. ZONING:
must provide a current
Addition ($50.00) Conceptual Review (90)
ADDRE''. a?,1 ;rit2, gl , _ _
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 4,.?,6}BJ.OCK 6 - b
Su'.,divrsi"" tloit tlit(Ta'Rit+
If property is described by a meets and bounds legal
oesiriftioir, please provide on a seParate sheet and
attach to this aPPlication.
NAME OF APPLICANT:
Mailing Address:
Phone
NAME OF
Mai Iing
APPLICANT,S REP SENTA IVE:
Phone
I. NAME OF OWNERS:
*SIGNATURE (S)
Mailing Phone
J. Condominium Approval if applicable'
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are Lo be paid aL
ii" ii*" of submittar of DRB applicaLion' Later, when
ippfyl"g for a building permitl- pleasb identify the
"iiri'ui. valuation or [ne proposar' The Town of va1l
wiII adjust the fee according to the t'able below' to
ensure ihe correct fee is paid. - --r-,, A
FEE SCHEDIJLE:
VALUATION
$ o-s 10,000
s10,001 -$ 50r000
$50,00L-$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ 5001000
$500,001 - s1, oo0,0oo
$ Over $1r 000,000
*NO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED
applicantlot area.
/Ll
^/
.t oCign Review Action Filh
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Nurnber l2-
Project Name:
Building Name:Ad-=a
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone:
@ontact, Address and Phone:
Legat Desoiption: to6l-D" Blocr 5-B subdivision Zone District C( Z
P@ect Street Address:
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motion by: 3 .r,,*< Volrit 4 - O
Seconded by: Tn-' " I
p{nnrovat
I Disapproval
! Statf Approval
Conditions:
Town Planner
oate: '7, 6, 74 DRB Fee Pre-paid $ eo.*
oo
'?'b-?-1 Gte.e-( T^.ut-o R^:ZS'-_ 5K73
d
qbre t/e'7"t
1--
e'ftV? FeFt*ta bJ /
de*11l-t, 4vt? P-iAtE
),tr,t1>+A.JG V'at?t ie d
w" A4efl (b/>q.r)
lXtz-
<-cr6AI-AFJT-
-
14kzz, b1F-v l'lFtur+
PAuu€T+
w I avT a-tT
FAnF|.-I
i.,.Ct+'/2" P5Ftez- F/(t\ tl-rtt ?valAbrL
V-lAvv .*e*1 (l/Ac'.1\
VJ / ?/eu ?HtA,tt-te ( r.,o.)
zY lz-dw
lprt-1
$.re
€*rgU-
l&, N=
?ra aeflv+l
?ifi?O+e-e a,-taafflFlg crtAe oA
qtrl(ave- fi-Y F'IBF{ 7f *l?rt(- evoqulqa AL{eue
_----+ .)2ft t/b,t/ FT
71tu? Acherl. ( t/AA.t\
(l- +1wv ?4n ( h 4)
ntuH aHtpa (z tr\
,&) itu
MECH SHAFT DETAIL Lt l-t'
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
227 BNIDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO
lF]TEFt+^1€I \ ,/ Ca"?e? lFlTEFa
lN.r/ ?*tn rra4r
l\b,/| \ 2- aAC 2t t- tt ar -:a-
PQrrrr'r TC2 *fA#revised 6/L8/sL
/ffiowA'--
DRB APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAIL'
DA?E APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
tt***t*tttt
THIS APPLIqAIION IIILL NOT BE ACCEPTED T
I'NTIL AI.L REQI'IRED INSOBIIATION IS SUBMIEIED
ttaa*ttai*
JUIi 1 :;
I.
A. DESCRIPTION::.rbrt {',rhc-92('c.-,-,-
2. qvt ++.
EI TYPE OF REVIEW:
D.
Subdivision
E. ZONING:
Frh;
mus! provide a current
&F /d*;
J.
K
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are Lo be paid at
the time of submittal of DRB application. Later' when
applying for a building permit, please identify th-e. - ,^.kuttui'ut6 vafuation of ine proposal. The Town of V'ail ..6\4'will adjust the fee according Uo the table below, to 91t-
ensure the corre"t #ffiZ$ "rr "oro, sZo'-
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
$ 0 - s 10'000
I 10,001 - $ 50,000
$ 50,001 - $ 150,000
s150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000I over S1,000,000
*NO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$1.00.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
WITEOUT OWNER' S SXGNATURE
COLORADO
Nesr Construction (5200.00) X Minor Alteration (S20'00)
Addition (S50.00)Conceptual Review (S0)
ADDRESS: Zzr brr\e - €rt-'
LEGAL DESCRTPTTON: Lot rh:: Bf ock 6',?
If property is described by a neets and bounds legal
aescribtion, please provide on a separate sheet and
attach to Uhis aPPIication.
LOT AREA: If requiredr aPPlicant
stamped survey showing lot area.
NAME OF APPLICANT EA* /6)
Mailing Address:>o Phone
NAME OF APPLICAN T, S REPPESENIa,
I.NAME OF OIONE
*SIGNATURE (S) :Mailing Address:
Phone
IVE:
J
o?",nn Review Action Ftn
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number oate 6'/1.74
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
owner, Addressanapnone: T-e-tpr, \ a^,n-
e@Address and Phone:
LegatDescription: Lotsj)D BtocR3'-I\s Suoaivision VyJ U,/Lnt l4 zone District cc>/
ProjectStreetAdAress: ?Z'? Tt)J.( 3'*,
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motion by:
Seconded by:
fl Approval
a Disapproval
Ss,"tnoprou",
Conditions:
Town Planner
DRB Fee Pre-paid # zs,e
C'rrrt 13lss.
APPLICATION DATE
SI GNIATYIIING APPLI CATION
Ptint or
PROJECT
PERSON SUBMITTING b?- f.o- ,nonr--*16'll3ll
(PIease
NAME OF
NAME OF
ADDRESS
NAME OF
ADDRESS
O}INER
SIGNATI'RE
LOCATION OF
DESCRIPTION
ooo q.
?.o.
OF OYINER
PROJECT '?-2-
OF PROJECT
snoNn-313-. Eo.Jl
8k z-o
FOR SUBMITTAI BY THE
SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN
?4/r\
THE Fol,l,owruc rllrbRMATroN rs REoUTRED
APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BE]NG
REVIEW BOARD.
A' 3R33lliTi3) 3[.]:"il:il(t''!lN'H$i.!l*ff1-Sct *it;"',*-
**l--- t. 6 -? TaWu\ ll *r= T7@
DrB ^ ?,b'?i.---+ a. to +?Tarvr +i il cs*r#ryl
SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL , fy-Y e4,,'r l <d
Fletr I (,)It Pi+ .r
SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO
D.
IJ
O q.4" x +ot' . 6, <F &-, bf llt'a.+,
C) 6en x 5+" ' r'ee sF
QIHEIGHT OF SIGN ABOVE GRADE ,/
DESCRIBE LIGHTING (EXISTING OR PROPOSED) @
LENGTH oF BUsrNEss FRoNTAGE (Fr) Eo pt"
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIAT'ON APPROVAL IO,,OC"' N
FEEr S20.00 PLUS $1.00 PER/$QUARE Foo
pe-ro f, *S cHEcK no. ll Z q oF srcN.AEEA.^ WTffiu/rrfiv
Site Plan
Elevations showing exact location of sign or
awning on the building
ehotolraphs showing proposed location
Colored scale drawing
Sample of proPosed materials
photograph of sign if availatRf,,-ol;-:i
lfr; t," I ''
lffi;.
t$N
1
z
J
6 - i. i" ''r :'t. ,
J(.r irift,..;lil
' ,i r '
eg11JUl'l 'OVER
Tn\/. rlvv-V iiv, D#t,
Sign Adninistrator
TO: SIGN APPLICANTS
When applications for signs are submitted, the following
information is required:
1. A completed sign/awning application (attached) .
2. A site plan showing the .gI3S! location where the sign' is to be located
. 3. A photograph if possible and building el.evation showingthe location of the proposed sign.
4. A scaled drawing which details the design of the sign,
as follows;
(a) Oolored exactly as sign wl]I be.(b) A list of. naterials to be used in sign (metaI,
wood, canvas, paint, etc.)(c) Photograph of sign if available.(d) Specific lettering sty.Ie and size.
5. If an awning is proposed, submit drawings showing
exactly how and where the awning is attached to the
building and how the awning is to be constructed.
5. Description of lighting that wiII be used in
conjunction with the sign or awni.ng. If proposing an
awning, Iighting is not allowed to shine through the
. entire awning which calls undue attention to thebusiness. Lighting may spotlight only the actual sign
Iettering on the awning
RECOMMENDATIONS OR POINTERS
1. Check sign code - verify'site, height. etc.
2. Be specific. vagueness on design, size, construction may
delay the approval of Your sign.
3. Measure frontage of business.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL.
If this application requires a separate review by any local,
State or i.'ederal agency other than the Town of VaiI, the
application fee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of such
review, may include, but are not limicect to: Colorado Department
of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees
which are in excess of 50t of the application fee, If' at the
applicantts reguestr dDy matter is postponed for hearing, causing
the natter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Conmunity Development Department to
have significant design, Iand use or other issues which nay have
a significant impact on the communit.y nay require review by
consultants other that town staff. Should a determination be
made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to
review any application, Community Development may hire an outsideconsultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to
pay him or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by
the applicant at the time he files his application with the
Com'nunity Development Department. Upon completion of the revierq
of the application by the consultantr dny of the funds forwarded
by the applicant for payrnent of the consuft.ant. which have not
been paid to the consultant shall be returned to the applicant.
Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of i he amount forwarded
by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant
within 30 days of notification by the Town.
Bg
zo
z, cBEgK.1P
#
z-t
fi9'19 '
--.
f-z.
o_
L.JLa
#
rZloIF (J
f lrJEZI b#I zoRovuJ
IF Fzs_ Jo,.!'- a lrE!fi3< 9F_. 3=
u- lr
UP
'L--8 -
*,u I
F i:- |oiiu-F /'\a=lzLn I
8''-
t)a
r, fi)(l.oiI
L]E
\
Foc)Jz
U-Jro ut prh
.$ ff.'ff
e gX-
J ogti -mj(q
o-le-JJO
TF00
$J
Cftl^712*t^.t t-1gF-- .
oIo
=lrJE
Llqt
F
olrj
lrJEF
$
7.
0
a_
rllIL
7-
oi:
t-
ua
F
0
7.
e
\t
+
o
uJt-6
att
UJi
o0
f-
t\.
I
ir]
o
v
a)'
COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
227 BNDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO
JIJ.}'|-1=-94 l'tOh|H I GHT,ECH
"-+
*
111hrht ?*lc-?l!u^A
tl^re { DtJ.- 1a1+*w\
36, y24, =rlZoft<4: G,O t
'.
a
i.
I
i
I
L
I
:
JlJ.tl:- 13-94
o$
6b rt
/r lE
|s,**
t
N
et+A
s
(r
T-TFg
JIJt.{_IE_94 FIOH
';-+itlJ
Oo'
B"t'i'ir
HIGHTECH s r cNf
:A
P - A4l.toF,,|J r_lr-'r - I =-.94
3t
ri i
D
r;
ri)tJ
(-
I
.l
'r*tt.1
y#
-a
I{'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Dan Stanek and Gary Murrain
Mike Mollica
April 15, 1994
The Covered Bridge Building
}or{e to,zA,1.+ --t1'
The following are the conditions of the approval for the issuance of a building permit for the
Covered Bridge Building:
Prior to the Town conducting a lraming inspection on the project' an
lmprovement Location certilicale (lLC) shall be submitted to the Town of Vail
Department of community Development a minimum of forty-eight hours prior lo
the requested inspection. The ILC shall certify the footprint of the building as
well as identify all roof ridge elevations.
Prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary certificate of occupancy (TCO) for
the covered Bridge Building, the developer shall post a bond, cash escrow, or
letter of credit, in an amount necessary to insure the completion of any
outstanding improvements, not completed at the time of the requested TCO.
Said guaralntee for completion of any outstanding improvementlshall be in
accoriance with Section 18.54.070 (Per{ormance Bond) of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code.
Prior to the Town's issuance of a TCO for the covered Bridge Building, the
developer shall grant a pedestrian and landscape maintenance easement to the
Town, for the purposes of pedestrian access to the pocket park and
mainlenance of the planters and pocket park landscaping.
Prior to the issuance of a TCO for the project, the exposed northeast elevation
of the Gasthof Gramshammer, adjacent to Bridge Street, shall be finished with
stucco and painted to match.
Per the Design Review Board (DRB) approval, and according to Sidney
Schultz, project architect, the five retaildoors (doors 1, 2,11,12, and 13) will
have divided lighls,
According to the March 16, 1994 DRB approval, the developer shall paint a
small sample of the railing color for further review by the DRB and for final
approval.
No signs are currently approved for the Covered Bridge Building. The DRB has
recommended that the developer make an application for the review of a sign
program for the entire building.
2.
3.
4.
c,
6.
D'^e tt'tU'11 _--+ 7.
8.Prior to the issuance ol a TCO for the project, the Town's Landscape Architect
shall complete a sile inspection to ensure that the existing large evergreen
trees, in the adjacent pocket park, have not been damaged during the
construction process. lf the Town's Landscape Architect determines that any
trees are damaged, then the value of the trees shall be collateralized, at full
replacement cost, for two growing seasons. lf, after two growing seasons, the
damaged lrees do not return to full health, then the developer shall replace said
trees with a similiar tree(s) ol like species and size.
IF YOU HAVE ANY
CALL FOR ABBY,
TELECoPTER (303)
QUESTIONS OR PNOBLEMS
476-1612
REGARDING IIHIS TJAX, PLEASE
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE!
NUI1BER Of PAGES (INCLUDING coVER): --.- I
+.v0*mlwt-
rltow t)wr1
O O rD
- rA ng'" o/J-fA:rz o .. Xb ,!.L,
LIMITED LICENSE AND EASEMENT AGREEM M
ThTS LIMITED LICENSE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT iS MAdE ANd
entered into thls 12th day of Aprit, 1994, by and beteteen the TowN
OF VAIL, COLORADO a Colorado munlcipal corporatlon. (the "Town") 31O
covERED BRIDGE BUILDING, LTD., a colorado Limlted PartnershiP
( "Developer" ) :
WHEREAS, Developer desires to demolish and redevelop
.Lmprovementa on a parc:el of real ProPerty..f.t th: Town of Vall more
paiUlcularly described as Lot "c" ana f,oU I'dir and the southwesterly
4 feet of Lot "b", Block 5-8, Vail Village Flrst Flling (th9
"covered Bridge Property" ), and, ln as_sociation with such
demolitlon and redeveltpmentr'the Developer deslres to use, and the
Town requires lmprovemLnts to certaln land proposed for use by
n"".fop.t, and thL Developer 1s w11Ilng to expend slgnlflcant sums
In imp-rovements to, certitn real proplrty owned.by the Town and
.o.. iurticularly descrlbed tn SxnlUtL A attached hereto and made
a pait hereof itnt "Toi{n Property"), and to -provlde llmlted
assistance to th; Town Ln associatlon wlth removal of a structure
known as the Covered Brldge, belng a part of Brldge Street wlthin
the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS,theTownlswlllingtograntto.Developerallmlted
license agreenent to permtt constructlon on the Town Property' to
allow sali lmprovemerits to remal.n on the Town Property for the
perlod of ttme- set forth herein, and ls further will,ing -to permit
[,ne os" of certaLn other property owned by the Town of vall as more
fully set forth hereln;
Now,THEREFoRE,lnconslderationofthemutual-promisesand
covenants contalned hereln, the partLes agree as follows:
1. Grant of License for Cpfrs!.ruqtlo-n Use' ,The Town grants
to neveto for the use bY
Developer bt tne Town Property for the following uses:
For constructlon storage' a staglng area' mal'ntenance of
construction equipment, and constructlon of improvements upon
the Town frop-erly and the Covered Brldge ProPerty, ln
accordance wlti thL plans of the Developer as more fully set
forth hereln.
2.
grantsfor the
uses:
Grant of License and Easement for UtIIlty Use.
to Deve @er a non-excluslve ll ted llcense and
use by Developer of Lhe Town Property for the
The Town
easementfollowing
For the installatlon, malnlenance and repalr- of underground
,ttfffty llnes and facilltles (and such above-ground facilltles
a3 may be necessary in assoclatlon wlth such underground
utility linesl serving the Town Property and the covered
Bridge properiy, lncludtng but not necessarlly limlted to
elec[,ricity, water, sewer, telephone, natural gas, and cable
television.
The Town of Vall agrees that 1t wlll grant a permanent easement for
ine naintenance of- such utility facilities to such utllity company
or companles at such pernanent location, as approved by the Town of
Vai1.
3.
5.
DeveLoper'
Developer
for Use of Streets The Town grants to
Developer the use bY DeveloPer
of t,hai portlon of Bridge Street north of its lntersect'ion with
Gore Creek Drlve and Gore creek Drlve for the followlng uses:
For constructlon actlvlty and for dellvery of construction
materlals as requlred by and conslstant wtth the flnal deslgn
plan for the demblltlon and reconstruction of improvements on
the Covered Bridge Property.
The use of Gore Creek Drlve and Brldge Street noted above shall be
permlt,ted on the fottowlng condltions:
a. Removal and delivery of materlals shall occur and be
completed between the hours of7:00 to 11:00 AM and 2:00 to 7:00 PM
eacir day, in accordance wlth the requlrements of the Town of VaiI
Builctin!-DepartmenL for the Commercial Core I zone district.
b. Except durtng perlods of removal and dellvery of
construction materials, the eastern slxteen (15) feet of Bridge
Street shall remain unobstructed durlng the perlod from the lst day
of July, Lg94 ' through the 5th day of September ' L994 ' At aII
other Limes durlng the perlod of the llcense granted under thls
paragraph, the ea-stern twelve (12) feet of Brldge Street shall
remaln unobstructed.
4. Construction of ImDrovements . 04 Tojrtn PrgperFv' . . -I"conJunctlo develoPment PIan, :16"
Dev6loper shal} construct lmprovements on the Town Property in
accordlnce with that plan approved by the Developer and the Town of
vail and attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Town Property
Improvement Plan" ) .
Restoratlon of Town Propertv. At the conclusion of the
reO Brtdge ProPerty, the
shall restore the surface of the Town Property and anv
Grant License
ffii as possibl", to its natural state, with the
FxGFtl3n of that portlon of the Town Property whlch ls improved to
othei standards under the Town Property Improvement Plan.
ino the foreqolnq, 1n the event the To!4 reeenElEus!
roves some Portlon of tle surface o
1lc inEludinq Uut not timited to gllet!-lrnE t
ffiek Drlve and the covered Bridoe
ana for That reason the Developer would experlence s
eTf pay o',rer to the Torcn ,g-ug-h--arnountffi the restoratlon qf rh
surface of the Town Propertv and Publlc wavq.
6. Mqintenance and Repalr of ToHn- oJ VilI Prgpertv'Developer onsible for the maintenance
and repalr of the lmprovements located on the Town Property.
DevelopLr shall be responslble for any danage to the To$tn Property
caused by the placement and operatlon of the lmprovements on the
Town Propertyg blic W Notw a
the event the Town reconstructs or i roves some rtion of the
rovements to the Town Property a I{avs ncludin
rovements on Br Street,t$reen Gore
overed Br el w l.tOU otherwise
requl.r o be res the
savlngs, then the DeveloPer shall.
Dav over to the Town such amount as Is savecl ano wot
exDencleo ln e restoratl'0n o rovements to
Property and Publlc vlglE_:
7.Use of Crane for Benefit of the Town of Vqll:The
Developer w @ate a construction crane on the
Tovtn Property in assoclatlon wlth lts construction actlvity as
required-by and consistant wlth the flnal design plan for the
demolltion and reconstruction of improvements on the Covered Bridge
Property. The Developer wlll provide the use of that constructlon
crane, within the llmits of lts capacity, to assist the Town in the
rbmoval of the Covered Brldge from its present locatlon to a point
wlthin reach of the craner and the reconstructlo
Brldge, and not tnterferlng wlth the Developer's construction
ffilEy, provJ.ded, however, that the Town of Vail shall be
responslble for the dlsassembly of the Covered Brldge ln such
manner that the capacity of the construction crane is not exceeded
ln the removal of the Covered Brldge materlals. --In the event the
crane available to the Developer is unable to assist ln eiLher the
whether because of absence o e crane,ercapac
e, or anv other reaso
obllgated to bdy to the Town up to $51000 toward the cost of crane
ruction of the Coverecl Brlctge, or an
8. rnsurancg, rggulTgl.nents 1 Developer shalt obtaln
comprehenslvepuffisurancecover1ngDeveIoper's;;ti;ili;I- "" in" Town Propertv in the amount of one million
dollars ($1,000,0'oOiJot tu"h tnitoent glvlng.rlse to a clalm for
bodtly InJury or property damage' The -Town shall be named as an
additlonal lnsurdd -and a ceittftcate of lnsurance shall be
furnished by DeveloPer to tfre rlwn and kept in full force and
;*;;t throrighout th; term of thls agreement '
.o o'?'no, '?i::t""tt';i:"'$:?a:Ii:!alt liabtlities, Judgments, costs (including reasonable attorneys
fees), damages, "riii6, claims and actions oiany kind or nature by
reason of lls use of the Town Property'
10. Revocatio4. The llmited llcense granted in Paragraphs 1
and 3 may be t.lrffiur l;. i';; In the fofowtng manner: rn the
event Town of v"Ji- aetLrntnes t,hat a default has occurred in the
performance of tne oniigaiio^" of oevelopgl' tl9 Town of Vail shall
provlde Developei(;;a;-i-i o-eveloper proiides the Town of Vail with
the name and .JOi.""' of nevelo-per ''s construction lender' that
constructfon fenaerl,- a-notice of defautt, ldentlfylng -the. nature
of the default. ;;'.i"peiinarr have ten (10) day-s wl-thin whlch to
curesuchdefault,andDeveloper'sconstructionlendershallhave
an additionaf fiJJ JiG *it'nli which to cure such default' rn the
event the default i; not corrected within such Perie6, then
DeveloPerwlllremoveatltsexpenseallimprovementslocatedonthe Town nroperiy within ten (1-0) days aftei.receiving notice of
the rermtnation .it'ln"' ii.ll.A'ifi"n"6 granted 1n Paragraphs 1-and
3 hereof. The ""^p"iitions under this laragraph shall not include
Sundays and ho1ldaYs.
ll.Removaloflmprovements.Intheeventtheremovaloftheimprovementson@snotaccompl1shedwithintwenty(20) days of t'ne- compigtiol of- the lmprovements to the Covered
Brldge Property and the Town nropeity' .lht Town ls hereby
authorlzed to t".ou. same and strati nave the righ-t- to make an
u"".i"tn""t against the Covered Bridge Property and collect the cost
of removal in the same manner as g5neral taxes are collected'
rovisl.on lncurred the Tostn,less the amount whlch the Developer
ncls on e rovlslon O o ffi for tne removal 0r
construc ono e Covere e, calcula e basrs o
hal -day or grea er useaqe .
12, Terminatlon of License as to conltruclien- AcF-iviligg:
The limit cense granted In ParagraPns 3 hereof shall
cornmence on APril 18, 1994' and
following schedule:
shali tLrminate according to the
4
a. During the perlod fron Aprll 18, L994, through November
20, 1994, the limtted llcense granled ln Paragraphs l and 3 shall
be 1n effect.b. During the period from November 21, L994' througlt APtll
L5, 1995. t.he limlted llcense granted ln Paragraphs l and 3 shall
be 1n effect, provlded that exterlor actlvltles shall be limlted to
the following hours:@c. ouiing the period from April 15, 199!, through JulV f,
1995, the 11mlt6o ttce-nse granted ln Paragraphs I and 3 shall be I'n
effect.
13. Termination of License and Easement as to utilit
Actlvlties.granted in ParagraPh
t--GlE-fl-T-ommence on the date of this agreement and shall not
terinl-nate except by agreement of the Tolvn of Vat1, the owners of
the Covered Bridgi Pr-operty at the'time of termination, and any
affected utillty -company, provlded, however, that the locatlon of
any utillty lfnes LnA alsociated llcense may be changed by
agieement o-t the Town of Vail and an affected utility company
wlthout the consent of the then owners of the Covered Bridge
Property if the servlce to the covered Brldge Property is not
relocated or otherwise adversely affected.
14. Tlminq of Acttrrtt,:Lgg_:. It ls agreed that the actlvities
contemplat@ 5 of this Agreement may occur at
any time duri-ng th6 term of the Llcense as to constructlon
AcLlvities as deftned in paragraph 15, provided that the only
activities occurlng during the period from November 2l , L994,
through Aprll 15, 1995, snitt be deliverles to the covered Bridge
tropeity to be used !n lnterlor constructlon, which deliveries
shall occur withln the tlmes stated ln Paragraph 15.
TOWN OF VAIL,
a Colorado munlclpal corPoration
By:Title:
rp\llcagnt. tov
12 April 1994
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
DeveloPer
By:East-tlest Partners' Inc.
Title: General Partner
By:
TitIe:
EXHIBIT A
A11 of that portlon of Lot "b", Block 5-B' vall Vlllage First
iiiitg, Li".pl tne-southwesterly 4 feet of said Lot "b"
EXHIBIT B
The Town ProPerty Improvement Plan Is deflned as that plan whlch
h;; ;;;; appio..r"d nv-tG iown or vail for the inprovements to that
illrtf." .g-iog ',6'ir' gfocf 5-Br Vatl Vlllage Flrst. Flllng, except
fi;-;;;d;"t""ry E tler of said Lot "b", at presentrv on f ire wlth
the Town of ValI.
t
,'ilsign Review Action Ftm
TOWN OF VAIL
Date 1'/2, ?.1Category Numbel lz-
PqectNarnet ( ?v-e--..-l T\ AiAZ 7 "4/r
Building Name: ' '' '
Projest Description:
Owner. Address and Phone:
@"onact,Addressandphone: 3'j < ' '/i +^u' '^
Legal Description: LoVJ-talLBbck 5' R SubdivisiondJ1\ /
ProjectStreet Address: I ' /122 V
Zone District aC )
Board / Statt Action
Motion by:
Seconded by:
fl Approval
! Disapproval
\ stattRpprovat
Y\
Conditions:
Town Planner
Date: 4./2, 74 DRB Fee Pre-paid { zt.gt
,
TO
- lqfl otr \rlr!,TPDLTNilIIfi
PIION:
DATE APPLICATION RECEI\|ED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
tarttl*tr*a
A.
&4-s]F-1yj4 1u:51Ftf't t*t
o
0 1991
?r\\r ^Atrtl 6111 n;67t!EIS fDPllCfTlON fllti! fo|! EE ICCEPtID
IUV - UUlVllVl, UlY, UlilFrr. rr& nroutnrD ilrronlttrtor rs sugrrrrED' *t*t*attttr, P-BgirEcT rNEoRtdaTioN! ';
J 4?6L6Lz P.az
v revlred glUgl.
coro8rDo
B. TYPE OF RE\ITEII:
New Congtructl-on ($200.00) -la-uinor Alteration
:,lddttton ($50.001
c. ADDRES$, _..421
Conceptual Rcvier
D. LEGilL, DASCRIPTION: Lot 9etoctr 5-b
Subdlvislon NE
If propcrEy. te descrlbed by
( s20. 00 )
($0)
deccrlpt,loai pleBse provldcattach tcj -thls appllcatlon.
a nre€t8 and bounds leEal
on a aeparate aheet and
e1E.
F.
AONINGS
NAl.lE OFtlailing
IIOT AREA: If regulredl
stanped surirey ahoulng
applicantlot area.
nuat provide a curent
G.
H.
NAI,IE OF APPLICAI.IT
Addieas:
APPLICANT, S
I.OWilERS!
Condonlnl.un Approval if appltcable.
DRB FE8: DRF feeel ae shown abover are to be pald atthe tlne of subnlttal of DRE applicatlon. Laterr when
'\VALINTION FEEI 0-s lo,ooo $2o.oo
$101001 -9 so;ooo Sso.00$ 501001 - $ 150,000 $100.00s150r001 -$ 5001000 9200.00
$5001001 - 91,000;000 $400.00$ over $1,000,000 $S00.00
applytng for a bullding pernlt, please ldentify the ntaccurate valuatlon of the proposal. The Torm of Vall ru. .wiII adjugt the fee accoratngto the tabl€ b€torr,to | -
ensure thc correcr fee ts pald. tt' pAtD: g ,20da 11* ,(97
EEP SCHEDUITP! \ W t-7 'rl l016u\ 1ll1 11
r DISICN RElrrEN t(DRD.rlPNO\rl& t,(PIRIS OUE TEIR IFIER ErfILeDDRs\rrL Elrr,tg8 r BtEtDSne ptstrt 13 tgggED rm ccn$grRgcTrs rsSTAREED.
rgtottEBE(8): IMalllng Addieee;
>P'
Project Name:
tr
Category ruumUer 3-
ol",nn Review Action F*"
TOWN OF VAIL
BuildingName: 10{Ll.- v V v :' "
project Descriptio"' fhnu - NbUi[l
r Af6r
Legal Description: tott' fti"$ -,r erocr 5$ sruoiui"ion Vnr-0 V,lhq0 \fr zone District (6
-\1 O-r-clU
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
r,rotion uv, 8DL $vn[ u"", f D [\t!c,ll0
seconded ov, \U^tt< trJatclr'.Jr
$APProvat
n Disapproval
! StaffApproval
Conditions:
Town Planner
Date:DRB Fee Pre-paid 2oo, U
o
----Ino{idAr-Xil
s<acil, \Ur6
(
=1
9.2.71
P,---d
brG b,
52(
T{6.
b/(I5
Tt/.{
5r:4
tY/, A,
5Af
7/.-
No,'-,
I - )R6
OK
cA &- d"./. /1../4.* dAr42
Nl( a*f *"X/ ,h /"-fi-/
'4 / o\ 4 ai^^e ft o|- V44te 5X.
'4 Z1#. /ftl (/-^.t .*4.ry- ,
fl: .4 {, aL.a..,._ "r,.2',r7-* /-.(/ frt t*l
Il-" 4-*141r I frX ;f ,
ya- a'-'.1 f>A-* z-Jr- ^* zZ44 , o-il * /tf'a-
,;t -44^ 5e./4/zA.-27
R,ai r",*affi iX T * /*./,<4 .
f.U</*L/4\#4
Kt"f ra*/aaf^; fu fr * .N:F\D
T,rk -& Cn4,tln.'fu ", -t';d"X* /) ,/ .* 4 )
,.;4.e.w ry
Ot.rtr.C slrlgL
goloRtDo
Rtc'DFEB 161994
r*tttttttt
TBIS TPPLICAIION rtlJTr NOI BA ACCEPIEDUNIIL lI.|L nEOUInlD ItTtORutItoH Ig SuBUIrtEDa*t*i**tt*
A.DESCRIPTION:
l'DRB TPPLICTIION - 8mU Ot VtIt,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIT/ED :
DATE OT DRB MEETING:
I.
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Constructl.on ($200.00)Mlnor Alteration ($20.00)
Additlon ($50.00)Conceptual Review (90)
C. . -ADDRESS:z
D.LEGAIJ DESCRIPTION:Block 9'b
Subdivlsion ET
If property ls descrlbed bydeserJ.pt,lon, please providiattach to this applltation.
a meets and bounds legalon a separate sheet and
E.
F.
G.
LOT AREA: If reguired, appllcantstamped surJrey showlng lol area.
ZONING:
NAI.IE OFMaillng APPTICANT:
Address:
?iY{'tuwt ?Prir %ilNrz
,t. Condomlnium Approval if appllcable.
K. DRB FEE: DIB fees, as shown above, are to be pald atthe time of submlttal of DRa-applicitiorr. Later, whenapplytqg for a. building- permitl - preas- - iaent.iit-;fieaccurate valuation of the proposll. The town 6f vairwilr adjusr the fee according to the tiure berow, ro 4#slensure the corect fee ls paio. 1i; ": t
FEE SCHEDULE:
- TEg EI'IZ 3 }40+ fuET(@
$ ;Tuttto o, ooo s 53Too \---"/'
110,001 -$ s0,o0o $50.00I 50, oo1 - $ 150; ooo $1oo. ool1fg, 001 - $ s00,000 $200. o0$500, 001 - s1, 000, oo0 s400.00$ over $1, 000; OO0 $sgg:00
r DESIGN RIII'ITET| BOARD TPPNOVI! EXPINES OIIE IEIR, I}IER FI}IAI.APPROUT& UNIASS A BUrIDING PESI|IT rS ISSUID llrO CONSTNUCTION ISSTTREED.
H.NAI'IE OF APPLICANT'
Address:
OWNERS:
tsrGNttuRE(9):
Matli
**No lPPLrctrTroN tfrr.r. BE PRoctssED rrraoUlt o|yrrER, s srGlIATt Rt
1
I.
current
Condomlnium Approval if appllcable.
7
PLAIiIT ITIATERIAI @ Comrnon O Ouantitv Size*
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate
5 qallon.
GROT'ND COVERS
proposed shrubs.
TvDe
sLze of
IYPE oR METHoD oE V? 1A{ EecaEROSION CONTROL
soD
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterlor lightlng ls proposed, please
show the number of flxtures and locatlons on a separate
lighting plan. Identlfy each fixture from the lighting plan
on the li-st Uefow and provide the wattage, height above
grade and t,ype of llght ProPosed.
c.
D.
Mlnlmum slze of shrubs ls
Sguare Footaqe
'''48Qhg.o*r.,y'.ot;,* <u$PeL
l4rrut*tuUr,r/ Z{ 0, t, lz0faexV ht>*'l
oTItER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retalning walls, fences, swimminq
pools, etc.) Please speclfy. Indicate helghts of retainlng
iraffs. MaxLmum height-of wltls withln the front setback ls
3 feet. Maximum helght of walls elsewhere on the property
l-s 6 feet.
7.'.o
NA!,IE OF PRO.IECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTC arocx 5.8 suBDrvrsroN lu-la,
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTTON OF PROiIECT:
The following lnformatlon leReview Board before a final
A. BUILDTNG DIATERIALS:
reguired
approval
IYPE OF
for subnittat
can be given:
MATERIAI
to the Design
Roof
Sldlng
Other lfall Materlals
Fascia
Sofflts -
l{indows
lll.ndow Trim
Doors
Door Trl-m
Hand or Deck
Flues
Flashlngs
Chinneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.LANDSCAPING:Nane gf DesJ.gner:
- phone:
Rails
Co* p*)
D Fznlttt
tfu>
PLA}TT !,IATERIAI,S:
PROPOSED TREES
Common Name Ouant,ltv Size*
7
-a_
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
?eea A: Jwetla, P r rn.(;\,.,..rt.
*Indicate callper for deelduous trees.
trees.
Mininun calioer forheight for conLferous
COLOR
Indicate
| .. tri-'. I tI -- * .,li1!
l/l't
TO:
FFIOM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Departmenl
March 14, 1994
A request for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopmenl of
the Covered Bridge Building located a1227 Bridge StreeVLots C and D and a
part of Lot B, Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East Wesl Partners
Mike Mollica
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicants are proposing a major redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located
at227 Bridge Street. The project would be considered a "demo/rebuild" which would involve
the demolition and removal ol the existing slructure and the construction of the proposed
building on this site. The proposal calls lor major design modifications to the front entrance
(east elevation) of the existing commercidl spaces, the creation of-lowe,I-]gYf:lcgl!CIelgjal
spaces which would be accessible from slairs direclly on Bridge Street, lhe infill ol the
northw€St section of the property, the addition ol an elevator at the west end of the building,
and the addition of two upper level floors to accommodale one condominium. The exlerior
materials proposed for the structure would be predominantly stucco and wood, with a wood
shake shingle roof. A snowmelt system would be installed in all pedestrian areas on the
property and the snowmelt system would also extend to the two exterior stairs (sandstone) on
Bridge Street. These areas would be finished with concrete unit pavers, in the approved
Streetscape design.
As a result of the two previous PEC worksessions, the applicant has shifted the entire
structure back to within 6" of the western property line, and has further shiited the fourth and
fifth floors lo the west approximately 4'. The Bridge Street (east) elevation ot the structure is
now proposed to be located approximately 7 feet back from its currenl location. The fifth floor
has been modified to provide an east-facing "double dormer", which further conceals the flat
roof portion of the structure.
As a part of this redevelopment, the applicants have also proposed to upgrade and improve
the Town's adjacent pocket park to the north. The original design for the pocket park was
completed by Winston and Associates and has been recently modified by the staff and Todd
Oppenheimer, the Town's landscape architect. Final Design Review Board approval of the
pocket park design shall be necessary.
Also included in the redevelopment, the entire structure would be brought into compliance with
all of the current building and lire codes, (the building would be fully sprinkled)'
Due to this project's location within the Commercial Gore I zone district, approval by the
Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) of a malor GCI exterior alteration is
required. The staff has reviewed the applicant's submittal, and agrees that the proposal as
redesigned would comply with allof the Town's development standards for the Commercial
Core I zone district. No variances or view corridor amendments are required for this
redevelopment.
II. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
. On August 27, 1990, the PEC approved a major CCI exterior alteration for the
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building.
. On August 29, 1990, the Town's Design Review Board (DRB) granted final design
approval for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building. Although there is no
time limit or expiration for the previously approved major exterior alteration, the final
DRB approval for the redevelopment has expired.
. On February 14, 1994, the PEC held a joint worksession with the DRB to review the
major CCI exterior alleration proposal.
. On February 28, 1994, the PEC held a second worksession to review the major CCI
exterior alteration proPosal.
. On March 2,1994, ihe DRB held a conceptual review of the proiect.
o
III. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of the development standards for the proposed redevelopment of
the Covered Bridge Building:
She Area:
Buildable Area:
S€lbacks:
Heighl:
Commm ArEa:
GRFA:
Unils:
Site Coverage:
Landscadng:
Parking:
Loading:
Cromnrercial Useg:
Gross Floor Area:
COMMERCIAL
CORE I
ZONING
N/A
-N/A
Per the Vail Mllage Urban
D€sign Guide Phn
60%: 33' or less
rO%: 33 fi. - 43 tl.
1,265 sq. ft.,
or 35% ol allowabl€ GRFA
3.614 sq. lt. or 80%
25 units per acre,
2 unils for lhis properly
3,740 sq. lt., or 8(P/o
Per lhe Vail Village Urban
Design Guide Plan
Per th€ Town of Vail
Parking Slefldatds
P€r the Town of vail
Loading Slendards
N/A
N/A
EXISTING
PROJECT
4,675 sq. tt.
4,518 sq. tl.
N: 0'
S: 1'
E: 7'
W: 0'
43' lo ridge
762 sq. ft.
0 sq. n.
0 unils
3,650 sq. tt., q 7gf/c
Sarne
Requir€d: 22.1 spec€s
Required: I
Exisling: 0
8,867 sq. ft.
9,629 sq. fi.
PROPOSED
PROJECT
4,675 sq. lt.
4.518 sq. ft.
N: 1'
S: 0'
E: 14'W: 0'-6'
60.5%: 33 tt. or less
39.5%: 3il lt. - 43 tl.
1,265 iq. tt., or 35%
3,614 sq. lt., or 8f6
1 unil
3.726 sq. tl., or 79.7o/o
Sarne
Requhed: 28.1 spaces
Fequired: 1
Eristing: 0
7,671 sq. tl.
12,5$ sq. n.
lv.
The nine criteria for Commercial Core I exterior alterations shall be used to judge the merils of
this project. In addition, the PEC shall also utilize the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village
Urlcan Design Guide Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan and the purpose section of the
Commercial Core I zone dislrict.
As stated in Section 18.24.010 of the Town's Municipal Code, the purpose section ot the
Commercial Core I zone district is as follows:
"The Commercial Core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the
unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges
and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment.
The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air' open
space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and
uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urban design
guide plan and design considerations prescribe site development standards that
are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly
clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public
greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural
qualilies that distinguish the village."
The Ptanning Stafl finds that the Covered Bridge Building application for a major exterior
alteration rneets the Gommercial Core I purpose, as stated above.
V. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VA]L VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
Although not specifically categorized as a sub-area, the Covered Bridge Building is specifically
identilied in the Vail Village Master Plan as follows:
"Although it is a goal to maintain design continuity in the Village core, there will
be change in the core areas built environment. This is mostly due to the
number of properties that have not exercised their full development rights. The
most notable among these properties are the Red Lion Building, the Cyrano's
Building, the Lodge at Vail and the Covered Bridge Building. lf each of these
and other properties developed to their full potential, there will undoubtedly be a
significant increase in the level ol developmenl in the Village core."
There are many goals, objectives, and policies which are identified in the Vail Village Master
Plan that are applicable to the development of the Covered Bridge Building. The staff feels
that the following specifically address this project:
Goal #1 : Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
communitY and identity.
1.2 Obiective:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
1.3 Obiective:
Enhance new development and redevelopment through public
improvements done by private developers working in cooperation with
the Town.
1.3.1 Policv:
Public improvements shall be developed with the participation 0t the
private sector working with the Town.
Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist inEustry and pror.note year-round ecgngmic
health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole.
2.4 Obiective:
Encourage the development ol a variety of new commercial activity
where compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policv:
Effiercial infill development consislent with established horizontal
zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide activity generators,
accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and streetscape improvements
to the pedestrian network throughout the Village.
2.5 Obiective:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation, and maintenance of
existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of
our gues$.
Goal #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughout the Village.
3.1 Obiective:
' Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and
other improvements.
3.1.1 Policv:
Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and
seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
3.4 Obiectives:
Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
3.4.1 Policv:
Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall not
further restrict Public access.
Goal #4: To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspace
oPPortunities.
4.1 Obiective:
lmprove existing open space areas and create new plazas with
greenspace and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each
type of open space in forming the overall fabric of the Village.
4.1.2 PolicY:
The development ol new public plazas, and improvemenls to existing
plazas (public art, streetscape features, seating areas, etc.), shall be
strongly encouraged lo reinforce their roles as attractive people places.
The staff believes that the proposed redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building would
further the above Vail Village Master Plan goals and objeclives.
VI. COMPLIANCE WITH THE STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN
The Streetscape Master Plan concepts identified for the Covered Bridge area include the
following:
"slairs connecting Bridge Street to the pocket park and Gore Creek on the
north side of lhe Covered Bridge Building are needed. The pockel park should
be improved so that it could function as a picnic area or performance site in the
Village."
The Streetscape Master Plan addresses paving treatments in the Village as follows:
"The demarcation between the public right-of-way and private land may be
appropriate to dissolve or emphasize, depending on the individual project site.
The result will be to create a varied street color and texture that allows private
property owners creativity, but also establishes a comprehensive design context
to work within. The primary paving material for the right-of'way area of the
Village core is recommended to be the rectangular concrete unit pavers. The
herring bone pattern, which is proposed for most areas, is edged by a double
soldier course. The intent is to satisfy the need for a simple slreetscape
. treatment wilhout being monotonous. The double soldier course also creates a
point for starting and stopping pavers proposed by private developers that will
be compatible with the overall phased paving design."
Although the specific details of the proposed streetscape and pocket park design are
described in Section Vlll of this memorandum, overall, the staff believes the proposed
improvements make a positive contribution to the qualily of the area and are in compliance
with the Town's adopted Streetscape Master Plan.
vil.
vlil.
The Urban Design Guide Plan Sub-Area concepls identified for the Covered tsridge area
include a pocket park to the north of the site (with benches and planters). A "feature area"
with specialty pavers is also identified for a small area immediately southwest ol the Covered
Bridge.
The staff believes that the applicant's proposed modifications to the Town's pocket park,
including the viewing platform adjacent to the Covered Bridge and a new entry stair into the
park, are in conformance with the Urban Design Guide Plan Sub-Area concept and are a
positive public improvement.
The following are the nine Commercial Core I exterior alteration design criteria, as listed in the
Urban Design Guide Plan, to be utilized by the Planning & Environmental Commission when
evaluating CCI exterior alteration proposals:
A. Pedestrianization
Staff believes that the proposed redesign for the Covered Bridge Building will improve
the pedestrianization in the lower Bridge Street area. This section ol Bridge Street is
basically a car-free pedestrian area, however, due to the large numbers of pedestrians
utilizing this area at peak times, it is not unusual for the street to become congested.
The modifications proposed for the Covered Bridge Building, as well as the
modifications proposed for the adjacent Covered Bridge pocket park, would improve
pedestrian circulation and would also provide additional public seating areas.
The project architect has designed the building so that it would meet all the current
ADA requirements for disabled access. A "lift" would be located at the southeast
corner of the property, adjacent to the south side of the main entry stair to lhe second
floor retail level. The lift would be located behind a raised planter, which will assist in
screening the lift lrom Bridge Street. The lift would provide disabled access to the
lowest level of the structure, as well as to the pocket park. From the lowest level, it is
possible to access the main elevator at the rear of the building. All levels of the
building, with the exception of the fifth tloor, would be accessible from this elevator.
Staff has suggested that the design of the "lilt" be modified to better reflect the alpine
character of the Village, and the applicant has agreed to modify the design, subject to
final Design Review Board approval.
At the request of the DRB, the applicant has redesigned the southeast corner of the
site to eliminate the exposed lower level commercial space, from the main stair, south
to the Gasthof Gramshammer. This area has been fitled so that the Bridge Street
elevation would exlend up to the face of the building, thereby enhancing the pedestrian
experience. This area would be finished with conirete unit pavers (with integral
snowmelt), in the approved Streetscape design. A raised stone planler would be
added in front (east) ol the lift, and a bench would be added to the area.
Staff believes the proposed new pedestrian access into the Covered Bridge pocket
park, as well as the proposed safety railings, will be a major improvement over the
existing conditions.
B. Vehicular Penetration
As recommended in the Urban Design Guide Plan, and in conjunction with the
pedestrianization objectives listed above, the major emphasis regarding vehicular
penetration in the Village is focused on reducing auto penetration into the center of the
Village.
Loading and delivery for the Covered Bridge Building is currently, and will in lhe future,
be handled in the same manner as any other building within the Village core. All
loading/delivery vehicles are required to park in designated loading/delivery zones.
Hand carts are then necessary to transport the goods to the individual businesses.
One particular concern that slaff, and the PEC, has identified has to do with trash pick-
up for the Covered Bridge Building. Because the only legal access for this site is via
Bridge Street, stafl is concerned that trash pick-up would occur on Bridge Street. Staff
believes that this would be very undesirable, given that lower Bridge Street is
considered a 'no-vehicle" area. As discussed in more detail under the ServiCe and
Delivery section of this memorandum, the staff would strongly recommend that the
owner of the Covered Bridge Buibing discuss with the adjacent property owner, Pepi
Gramshammer, the possibility of allowing for service access through his site.
C. Streetscape Framework
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan recommends that it would be desirable to
have a variety of "open and enclosed spaces, both built and landscaped which create
a strong framework for pedestrian walks as well as visual interest and activity."
Further, lhe direction of the Guide Plan is not to enclose all Village streets with
buildings, nor is it desirable to leave pedestrian streets in an open and somewhat
undefined condition.
Statf believes that the applicant's redesign for the Covered Bridge Building creates a
positive streetscape framework for the lower Bridge Street area. Along with an
enhanced pedestrian experience in this area, the redevelopment would also create
new commercial activity generalors (i.e. additional street life and visual interest) with
the addition of the 'visible" lower level commercial spaces. ln order to provide a visual
connection between the lower level retail commercial shops and Bridge Street, the
applicant has shifted the east elevation of the structure approximately 7 feet back from
its current location. This not only provides lor a visual connection but it also allows lor
landscaping to be located in front of the building. The stalf believes thal the exposed
lower level commercial spaces, at the northeast corner of the structure and along the
pocket park, work well given the lower grades in the pocket park area. We support the
DRB's request to inlill the southeast corner of the site to eliminate the exposed lower
level commercial space, (from the main stair, south to the Gasthof Gramshammer).
Staff does not believe that split-level commercial provides a comfortable enclosure for
the street, and also does not provide the character and "Village feel" that the Design
Guidelines recommend. Statf agrees with the DRB, that the infill of this area will
enhance lhe pedestrian experience along lower Bridge Street.
With regard to the architectural considerations, the staff has reviewed the project with
the Town's design consultant Jeff Winston (Winston and Associales). The initial
design concerns identified were that the majority of the structure'S mass and bulk
should be concentrated on the western half of the property. Additionally, staff felt that
the building should step down as it approaches the easlern portion of the property
(Bridge Streel). Further, staff felt that the overall roof design should be simplified and
that the proposed fifth floor should be architecturally inlegrated into the rest of the
structure. Staff had also expressed concern regarding the relationship of the proposed
fourth and fifth floors to the existing Gasthof Gramshammer lodge rooms (and exterior
decks) to the south.
Since the two PEC worksessions, lhe applicant has modified the building's design to
reduce the length of the solid wall, which would have extended out (east)
approximately 8', from the edge of the Gramshammer fourth floor deck. At the request
of the PEC, the applicant shifted the entire slruclure 5' to the west, to within 6" ol the
western-most property line. Additionally, the Covered Bridge Building's fourth and fifth
floors have been pulled back, to the west, approximately 4', so that any potential
negalive impacts to the Gasthof Gramshammer would be lessened, or eliminated, and
so that the relationship of the Covered Bridge Building, to Bridge Street, would also be
improved.
D. Street Enclosure
In order to provide a more comfortable street enclosure in the lower Bridge Street area,
the PEC recommended (at the initial worksession) that the applicant consider shifting
the building to the west. The applicant has complied with lhis request and has shifted
the building approximately 5 feet to the west, up to within 6 inches of the western-most
property line. This modification, coupled with stepped-back fourth and fifth floors'
provides an external street enclosure which adds visual interest, and according to staff,
provides a very comfortable pedestrian scale, which is the desired condition in the
Village.
Due to the Covered Bridge Building shifling to the west, the staff would recommend
that the exposed northeast elevation ot the Gasthol Gramshammer, adjacent to Bridge
Street, be finished with stucco and painted to match the Gasthol Gramshammer. lt is
also recommended by staff that Mr. Gramshammer consider adding a retail window in
this wall area.
E.Street Edge
As previously mentioned, as a part of this redevelopment, the applicants have
proposed to upgrade and improve the Town's adjacent pocket park to lhe north, as
well as the building's frontage on Bridge Street. A total of three, raised, stone-faced
planters would be located along Bridge Street. In addition, two new planters would be
9
added at the lower retail level elevation, (please see the landscape plan). Plant
material proposed for the planters would include 3 Aspen, 4 Juniper, 7 Chokeberry, 3
Alpine Current, 10 Kinnickinnick and assorted mixed-perennials. To further the Vail
Village Urban Design Considerations, the staff would recommend that the applicant
consider the addition of flower boxes to the balconies on the building.
The design for the pocket park calls for the creation of a viewing platform/seating area
adjacent to the Covered Bridge. The Streetscape Master Plan recommended benches,
lighting and paver design would be utilized. A new entry stair into the park would be
constructed at the southeast corner of the park, which would provide pedestrian access
to the park and to the lower level commercial spaces in the building. The entire park
area would be re-seeded and irrigated as a part of the proposal.
In order to accommodate the redevelopment, the applicants have proposed to remove
the two existing evergreen trees which are located adjacent to the north elevation of
the building. These trees are very close to the building and have grown "one-sided".
The Town's Landscape Architect, Todd Oppenheimer, believes the two trees could not
be relocated successfully. No other vegetation is proposed to be removed with the
construction.
The Town will be responsible for mainlenance of the planlers located up at the Bridge
Street level, as well as maintenance of the planter and landscaping in the pocket park.
The developer of the Covered Bridge Building will be responsible for maintenance of
the lower level planter in front of the building.
F. Building Height
The Vail Village Master Plan has identified this property as having an acceptable
building height in the range of three to four stories. A story is defined as I feet of
height and no roof is included.
This property is unique in that there is an 8-foot difference in elevation between Bridge
Street and the pocket park area north of the property. During the review of the 1990
redevelopment proposal, the applicant had requested that stalf analyze and interpret
where building height base elevations would be calculated from. In 1990, the staff
made the following building height interpretations, and these interpretations were
subsequently upheld by the PEG:
1. That the Covered Bridge Building site be divided €qually, beginning at
the northeast corner of the property with a line running diagonal to the
southwest corner of the property. The statf and the PEC believe that
this analysis provided for a fair and equitable review of building height
because it allows for the Bridge Slreet elevation of the structure to be
based upon the grades on Bridge Street. lt also allowed for the
elevations of the building which lront north to the pocket park, and west
to Pepi's parking lot, to be based upon existing grades in the park area.
10
2. That the base elevation of Bridge Street (8,161 feet) will be used to
determine heights for areas of the building which fall into the
southeastern 50% of the divided property.
3. That the base elevation at the northwest corner of the Covered Bridge
property (s,153 feet) will be used to determine building heights for the
northwesl 50% of the structure.
During the PEC's 1990 review of the Covered Bridge Building redevelopment, the
drawings were submitted, and were certified, showing that the proposed design could
be built within the parameters of the height interpretation, and that the building would
not encroach into any Town adopted view corridor. lt was in late 1993 that the staff
learned that the 1990 approved drawings were not accurate and that the structure
could not be constructed without a height variance and a view corridor encroachment.
Although the stalf continues to believe that the above interpretation was an equitable
solution to a difficult problem, (given the unique topography surrounding this structure),
the staff has acknowledged that this interpretation has driven a design solution for the
site which does not appear to be compatible with the design standards for the Village.
From a design perspective, and from a practical point of view, staff believes that a
majority of this building's upper level mass should be localed towards the rear or
western portion of lhe site. However, the 1990 building height interpretation listed
above forces a design solution with a majority ol the building mass centered on the
property. This is necessary in order lo meet the 60-40 roof area percentages.
During the February 14, 1993 PEC worksession, the PEC again reviewed this
issue,and subsequently determined that the building height base elevation for
the Govered Bridge property could now be calculated solely from the Bridge
Street elevation (8,161 feet). This PEC decision was based on the understanding
that the applicant would redesign the structure so that the entire building would be
shifted back approximately 5' to the wesl, and additionally, that the 4th and Sth lloors
would further step back to the west.
G. Views and Focal Points
View Corridor #1 is the view corridor from the steps of the Vail Village Transportation
Center extending over lhe Village towards Vail Mountain. This view coridor was
intended to provide unobstructed views of Vail Mountain and key architectural features
such as the Clock Tower and the Flucksack Tower.
As proposed, the highest point of the Covered Bridge Building's redesign would 4!
encroach into any of the Town's adopted view corridors. ln order to avoid a view
conidor encroachment, a portion ot the fitth floor is designed with a flat roof. Although
this has been a very difficult design problem, the stalf believes that the redesign of the
fifth floor roof form, and the addition of a 'double dormer' adequately conceals the flat
roof from most pedestrian areas adjacent to the building. Because the project architect
has recently redesigned the roof form, at the request of the statf and PEC, the slaff is
comfortable delaying the view corridor certification until Building Permit.
't1
tx.
H. Service and Delivery
Per the Town Code, an additional loading space is noi required for the redevelopment.
No loading area exists for this site. The proposal includes a trash room lo be located
at the rear, or west, side of the building. Trash pickup is proposed via Bridge Street,
as this property has no legal access through the rear, or Children's Fountain area.
Again, it is strongly recommended that the applicant discuss with Pepi Gramshammer,
owner of the property to the west, the possibility of allowing for service access through
his site. Pepi Gramshammer has recently submitted plans to develop his propefi
(currently a surface parking lot), by adding an enclosed parking garage with
approximately I lodging rooms and two condominiums above the garage.
l. Sun/Shade
The applicant has provided a sun/shade analysis for the winter solstice (December
21st), and lor the spring and fall equinox (March 21st and September 21st). The
analysig was conducted for the existing building and the proposed structure, and
revealed shading patterns for 10:00 AM, 12:00 noon and 2:00 PM.
The proposed slructure will cast increased shade patterns on the adjacent pocket park
site to the north and northwest. The staff believes that this additional shade will have
minimal impacts due to the fact that the area of the additional shading is mainly lo the
northwest of the building, and this area is heavily landscaped with large, mature
evergreen trees.
There will be some additional "late day' shade (2:00PM) cast on approximately 4
square feet of Bridge Street, in the area of the proposed new stairs to the pocket park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends approval of the applicant's request lor a major CCI exterior
alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building. The slaff
finds that this redevelopment proposal, over the course of two PEC work sessions, has
developed into one which is in compliance with the Urban Design Considerations for
Vail Village as well as the other Comprehensive Plan elements described in detail
above. Staff believes that the proiect will have a very positive etfect on lower Bridge
Street and the entry to VailVillage. The staff's recommendation of approval includes
the following conditions:
1. That prior to lhe Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the
redevelopment project, the applicant shall verify that lhe proposed roof
design does nol encroach into View Corridor No. 1. This work shall be
completed by a registered surveyor in the State of Golorado.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy (TCO) for the redevelopment project, the applicant shall post
a bond, cash escrow, or letter of credit, in an amount necessary to
insure the complelion of any outstanding improvements, not completed
12
3.
at the time of the requested TCO. Said guarantee for completion of any
outstanding improvements shall be in accordance with Section
17.16,250 ol the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy (TCO) for the redevelopment project, the applicant shall
grant a pedestrian and landscape maintenance easement to the Town
for the purposes of pedestrian access to the pocket park and
maintenance of the planters and pocket park landscaping'
That the applicant add "divided lights" to the retail doors on the first and
second levels of the structure, subject to DRB approval.
That the applicant add flower boxes to the balconies on the building'
subject to DRB approval.
That the exposed northeast elevation of the Gasthof Gramshammer'
adjacent to Bridge slreel, be finished with stucco and painted to match.
It is recommended by staff that a retail window be cut into this wall.
4.
5.
6.
c:\pscvnsm6\bidg€.314
13
M MENtr
;,:,: riiii ,i ri fii
@_*Mi
#jjji *
ww#iiiffiN
""*c)'r' -;k i,l ,i jffilryriil
i$
,i' L---:::r:l-i. 11ffi i-:-----J ; .
.\"rtllr i :. jj i \\- 39-,
- 1i-.- .l
i.' . \'
,tA
.:21 1
::/1\tr1 |
:'.,:A Ioii
ir
o1Ir(,
frZ>a9j\,/D
6lQ
lrllrl
QO
OF(
F(E
ili;iii,iilmI rJilir-.-tll
F
t!
F
u
o
o0vu010c 'llYA
.El8ts 390lus Lzz
0Nrc-lrn8 l00lu8 0lu3AO3 @hoil
e
I
Ir
I
t
T
5
1
ct
t
t
4I
It
{t
tt
I
t
I
It
a
I
I
It
A
ct
;l
;l
1
cl
Ehgli
I
II
I
EI
ul
#1.
Ll?'Et?
ol=
GOfafr
Cfr99'1
#tE.eElEEa
r- +-
33oir5tt
3I
HE
F
fr1
f,l
g
tt
U)
frl
U
a
H
H
n
!25'
6
6
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
I-
.l('
ct(,
H
q
@
I
to
cx
|\
,l
o
o
xIt
| __ 9__
bIRlo
I lr-tx
i.
I
ot
cx(.)
o
Es-
FP*$t-r o
$.
dT
4;
Ha i*
-J-' J-f*-s , $ o56 S: o
:..\i
I'l.l
.g
r$-'$sIsnS
-a,?4f 7,i'i,--l-,'tP+-Q ,e 'p-Tqetq+
lfI
I
I
fiEr
tr(
iTFIt$
rq0
,/J
,21' biL
I
I
I.ll
=s
7.
\
{-
{.
.,f,
r\l
_J
N
F
0
t\)l
!$$J
T ,l/tb 'tb ,6-rbPIb.F ,z/fr'P
\l-l'lalsl
$l
EI
sl
sst
$lp
rtF
LJ"- - -J
T\
\
\
\
\
\
rclt c$r,Y
7-0.
Item No. 5 was a Vail Town Council appeal of a maior CCI exterior alleration, to allovrl for theredevelopmentoftheffi227)BridgeStreet,LotsCandD,andapartof
Lot B, Block 5-B, Vail Village First Filing. Mike Mollica reviewed the memorandum dated March
14, 1994, from the Community Development Department to the PEC, explaining In detail the
proposed project as requested by Applicants, Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners,
and Informed Council of PEC's recommendation for approval with the six conditions as listed In
staffs memo. Mike further stated two conditions were added by the PEC. The first condition was
lhal no vehicular access down Bridge Street would be allowed for service and delivery or lrash
pick up. The second condition stated that if a restaurant were added to the building, a trash
removal Program must come back for PEC approval. Sid Schultz, architect for ihe projecl,
entertalned questions. Ross Bowker and Peter Dan of East Wesl Partners explalned construction
activity and timelines for the proposed project, stating construclion was expecled to begin in April,
wilh a completion by Thanksgiving. Landscaping issues and concerns were discussed. Mike
Mollica suggested lhat a lree inventory be done. Any non-surviving trees could be required to be
replaced. Council agreed. Plans for the upgrade and additional improvements to the Town's
adjacent pocket park were discussed. Mayor Osterfoss stated Council members had discussed
commencement of the Streetscape Plan for lower Bridge Street in conjunction with the Covered
Bridge Building redevelopment. Paul Johnston moved to uphold the PEC's approval of the
redevelopment project, with a second from Merv Lapin, with the condition that any trees in the
area which did not survive during the two years after redevelopmeni be replaced by the
applicants. Mayor Osterfoss added the staging plan would be discussed at a later Work Session.
Mayor Osterfoss directed staff lo return to Council with suggestions as to how to proceed with the
Slreetscape lmprovements if a water line replacement would be necdssary with the project. A vote
was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. 6 on the agenda was a report lrom the Town Manager.
Merv Lapin made a motion to direct staff to amend, the SDD ordinance, eliminating
resldentlal/single lamily projects from qualifying for SDD stalus. Paul Johnston remlnded Councll
lhere was a petition currenlly circulating regarding an SDD issue and suggesled Council wait until
June to address the issue. Jan Strauch seconded the motion as made by Merv. A vote was laken
and passed, 6-1, Paul Johnston opposed,
Tom Stelnberg added he had recelved calls regarding illegal parking and towing off private
property. Mayor Osterfoss asked statf to investigate the situalion.
Jan Slrauch requested a timeline for the prioritization of goals. Bob Mclaurin updated Council
of status to date and suggested March 22, !994, as a date for completlon. Mayor Osterfoss
requested a copy of the document prlor to the meeting.
There being no furlher business, a motion to adiourn the meeting was made and seconded.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Holly L. McOutcheon, Town Clerk
Mhrfr| hkcn by Holly L lilcCddlcon
Vrll Town Coqdl Ertdng ilcctlng Mlrutr. 0t/.l5itl
I
\'i
3'/5.7.1 Ttu C*^4
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 15,1994
7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
7:35 P.M.
Chris Anderson
7:,10 P.M.
Jim Curnutte
8:25 P.M.
Chris Anderson
8:35 P.M.
Mike Mollica
l.
2.
EXPANDED AGENDA
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION-
Consent Agenda:
Ordinance No. 6; Series ot lc)94, second reading, an
ordinance amendirE the Investment Policy set forth in
Chapler 3.52 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail,
Ordinance No. 7, Series ol 1994, lirst reading, an ordinanoe
providing for the establishment of Special Development District
No. 32, Cornice Building; adopting a development plan lor Special
Development District No. 32" in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of
the Vail Municpal Code, and setting fonh details in regard therelo.
Applicant: David Smith represented by Tom Braun.
Action Reouesled of Councih Approvs/deny/modify Ordinance
No. 7, Series ot 1994, on first reading.
Backoround.Rationale: There was a site visit early this date
dufing Woft Session. Please re-revial previously distrifuted
materials.
Stalf Recommendation: Approve Odinance No.7, Series of 1994,
on first reading.
Resolution No. 8, Series ol 194, a resolulion designating Dana
Inveslments Advisors, lnc., as a money manager tor the funds ol
the Tourn ol Vail as permitted by the Chafler of the Town ol Vail,
its ordinances, and the slatutes ol the State of Colora6.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Besolution
No. 8, Series ot 1994.
Backoround Rationale: Changes to the investment policy
currenlly being approved permit the use of an indeperdent
investment manager. This resolution names one of those
manager.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 8, Series of 1994.
Vail Town Council Appeal of a major CCI exterior alteration, to
alloil lor the redevelopment ol the Covered Bridge Building (227)
BriJge Stree! Lots C and D, and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail
Village First Filing. Applicant: Hillis ol Snowmass, lnc. and East
West Partners.
Action Reouested of Council: There was a site visit early this
date during Woft Session. Review the exterior alteralion requesl
and uphold/ovenum/modify lhe decision ct the PEC regardirE the
CCI exlerior alteration. Re-revigfl materials previously
distributed.
3.
4.
9:35 P.M.
9:50 P.M.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends apprcval, with the
conditions lisled in statf's memorandum to the PEC.
6. Town Managefs Repon.
7. Adjoumment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
oaooooo
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL BEGULAR WORK SESSION
wlLL BE ON TUESDAY,322194, BEGINNING AT l2:dl P.M.. lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,4/5194,'BEGINNING AT 1:00 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAilBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
W|LL 8E ON TUESDAY,4l5l94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
ooooooo
C:\AGENDA.TCE
(Request form must be given to the Secretary to the Town Manager by 8:00 a.m. Thursdavs.)
MEETING DATE: March 15. 1994
(Prepare a separate Agenda Request for each agenda item. lf the
agenda item will be discussed at both a Work Session and an Evening
Meeting, be certain to check both boxes in this section and indicate time
needed during each meeting.)
o
0tr
Work Session
Site Visit
Evening Meeting
TIME NEEDED:-
TIME NEEDED:-
TIME NEEDED: t hour
WILL
B
K
i
THERE BE A PRESENTATTON ON THIS AGENDA TTEM BY NON.TOV STAFF?
NO.
YES. Specifics:
WILL THE PRESENTATION OF THIS AGENDA ITEM REOUIRE ANY SPECIAL
WILL THERE BE MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET FOR THIS ITEM?
NO.
YES. lf yes, is the material also for public distribution?
$. Yes.
O No.
ITEIII/TOPIC:
Town Council appeal of a major CCI exterior alteration, to allow for the redevelopment of the
Covered Bridge Building (227 Bridge StreeUlots C and D, and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail
Village 1st Filing).
Applicant:Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Review the exterior alteration request and Uphold/Overturn/Modify the decision of the PEC
regarding the CCI exterior alteration.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
Please see the Community Development Department's memorandum to the PEC, dated
March 14, 1994, included in the Council packet.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommendation is for approval, wiih the conditions that are listed in the staff
EOUIPMENT?
\-I i rn\- r\\.r.
O YES. Specifics:
Oq
fL't htt-:memorandum to the PEC.
Mike Mollica, Community Development
oFil '
Eric Berg, a neighbor, stated that he does nol understand why the fence has been
ailowed io remain in place as long as it has. He said he was opposed to the granting
of a variance for this lence.
Jeff Bowen stated that the fence did not comply with the Town of Vail's Zoning Code
and therefore would need to be taken down.
Greg Amsden stated he was not in favor of the fence and that it needed to pulled back
to the 20 foot setback line. He said that any fence to be erected on the site would
need Design Review Board approval.
Bob Armour stated that he would like to see the fence pulled back to the 20 foot
setback line.
Bill Anderson stated that he had no further comments.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she had no further comments and that she did not Jeel
that a hardship existed on the site.
Kristan Pritz suggested that should the PEC vote against this request that they should
put a time limit as to when lhe applicant should make application to the DRB.
Jeff Bowen stated that he would like the fence to be removed within seven days from
today's date or else the applicanl be cited for violating the Town of Vail Zoning Code'
Kristan Pritz stated that the applicant would have the right to appeal the PEC's
decision to the Town Gouncil within ten days of today's meeting-
Jetf Bowen made a motion to deny the applicant's request for a variance to allow a 6
foot fence and that the applicant has ten days to remove the fence with Bob Armour
seconding the motion. A 5-0 vote denied this request.
3. A request {or a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the
ru|bcatedat227BfidgeStreeVLotsCandDandapartofLot
B, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, lnc' and East West Partners
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a presentation per the statf memo. He siated that the number of
required parking spaces would be fine tuned at the time of building permit. He
summarized that staff was recommending approval ol the request and that it meets lhe
nine criteria listed in the staff memo. He stated that statf was recommending six
conditions in conjunction with the approval for this project.
Sidney SchulE, the architect lor this project, stated that the applicants did not have
any problems with the six conditions outlined in the staff memo.
Pl.nnlng lod Envltmmanl.l Comml.ion
lrrrch 14' 199'1 3
a
Jefl Bowen was concerned about the presence of a lrash truck on Bridge Street as a
result of this project. He also was concerned that should a restaurant be proposed to
be located in the Covered Bridge Building at some future date, that it be required to
come back before the PEC. He added that the construction staging for the project was
also a concern to him.
Ross Bowker, of East Wesl Partners, stated that during construction they would leave
a minimum width ol 12 teel on Bridge Street.
Kristan Pritz stated that the applicant has been working with Community Development
and Public Works and that all parties agree that Bridge Street needs to remain as open
as possible.
Jeff Bowen stated that with the continuing work towards increasing summer business,
he did not want to see Bridge Street become a "battle zone" during the summer
months.
Kristan Pritz stated that staff and Town Council shared the same concern.
Jeff Bowen stated that he would like to see some limitation placed on the amount of
time that Bridge Street would be 'cut off".
Peter Dan, of East West Partners, explained to the PEC how they envisioned the
slaging area to function.
Greg Amsden stated that he would still like to see Pepi Gramshammer work with the
applicant to resolve the trash issues that exist for this site, but that he would not vote
against this project if a resolution could not be reached with Pepi.
Harry Frampton, of East West Partners, stated that he had met with Pepi and Peggy
Osterfoss earlier and that it was possible that Pepi would agree to some "creative trash
solution'. He added that it did not appear that Pepi was planning to redevelop his
building this year.
Kathy Langenwalter inquired how far in lront of Pepi's building would the lence be
located.
Mike Mollica stated that the fence would be located approximately 15lo 18 feet out in
front of Pepi's building.
Greg Amsden stated that he was nol opposed to the proposed construction fencing.
Bob Armour stated that he agreed with Greg concerning the construction fencing' He
said that he did not want see anymore truck traflic on Bridge Street. He stated that he
was hopeful that Pepi would work with the applicants towards a solution to the trash
issue.
Planning rnd Environmenttl commiasion
i|rrch 14.100l
4.
Bill Anderson stated that he was opposed to trash trucks using Bridge Street and that
trash should be hauled to the intersection for pick-up. He said that he agreed with the
six conditions staff outlined in the staff memo.
Kathy Langenwalter stated she did not have problems with the proposed construction
barriers. She suggested getting school children involved with painting the fence for
something fun and creative. She stated that trash trucks on Bridge Street should not
be allowed and that the applicants should submit an acceptable solution to this issue
at the time of building permit. She stated that the PEC was not opposed to a
restaurant in this location, but that at present, lhe trash situation did not seem to lend
itself to restaurant use.
Kristan Pritz stated that it was not the deliveries that were a concern but that removal
of trash was an issue. The applicant would need to utilize the Town of Vail loading
areas. She stated that a trash removal plan for a future restaurant, could be brought
before the PEC.
Bill Anderson made a motion to approve the request for a major CCI exterior alteration
to allow for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building per the staff memo and
including the six conditions contained in the staff memo, with the addition of condition
7 that: 'fuo motorized vehicle be allowed to use Bridge Street for trash removal. He
added Condition 8 that: "The PEG would need to review the addition of a restaurant as
tenant space and its proposed trash removal plan.' Greg Amsden seconded this
motion and a 4-1 vote approved this request with Jetf Bowen opposing because he did
not feel the proposed construction staging plan was appropriate for Bridge Street and
that a coordinaled development plan needed to be done for the Gramshammer ancl
Covered Bridge Buildings.
A request for a worksession {or a major exlerior alteration, site coverage and setback
variances for the Lifthouse Lodge commercial area, Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st
Filing/S49 West Lionshead Circle.
Applicant:
Planner:
Bob Lazier
Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte made a presentation per the staff memo. He reviewed the three requests
(selback variance, site coverage variance, and major exterior alteration). Jim reviewed
the criteria to be used in evaluating this proposal with the PEC.
Galen Aasland, the architect for this project, stated that they were attempting to
improve this site through this proposal. He explained the rationale for the proposed
rekord doors proposed lor Pizza Bakery and Bart and Yeti's.
Ross Davis, owner of Bart and Yeti's, stated that he was concerned that there be an
efficient construclion process so that his business is not negatively effected.
Planning and Environmental Commission
March 14,1994
ot.
@rz ftn
@ *zn - Nd-Y
3,t4,71
e
FtrC
,/e /2,4/ 6. \
Rr* R*L- n*. ,^^24 6rt- & ,64 /z' \/-// fre
6T A. 5.afV y
t>4 +. Afr-l "
Ov'-
13/x/ A, - No ,h4.1
T^--/- - tu/.r/ -X .,4 - I'h &, h--L
t't"a;
lM a^-l t
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
Applicant:
Planner:
i:!_ [
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Mike Mollica
"[cFYTO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
March 14, 1994
A request for a major CCI exterior alteralion to allow for the redevelopment of
the Covered Bridge Building located at227 Bridge StreeVLots C and D and a
part of Lot B, Block 5-8, VailVillage'lst Filing.
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicants are proposing a major redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located
aI227 Bridge Street. The project would be considered a "demoirebuild" which would involve
the demolition and removal ol the existing structure and the construction of the proposed
building on this site. The proposal calls for major design modifications to the front entrance
(east elevation) of the existing commercial spaces, the creation of lower level commercial
spaces which would be accessible lrom stairs directly on Bridge Street, the infill of the
northwest section of the properly, the addition of an elevator at the west end of the building,
and the addition of two upper level floors to accommodate one condominium. The exterior
materials proposed for the structure would be predominantly stucco and wood, with a wood
shake shingle roof. A snowmelt system would be installed in all pedestrian areas on the
property and the snowmelt system would also extend to the two exterior stairs (sandstone) on
Bridge Street. These areas would be finished with concrete unit pavers, in the approved
Streetscape design.
As a result of the two previous PEC worksessions, the applicant has shifted the entire
structure back to within 6" of the western property line, and has further shifted the fourth and
fifth floors to the west approximately 4'. The Bridge Street (east) elevation ot the structure is
now proposed to be located approximately 7 feet back from its current location. The fitth floor
has been modified to provide an east-facing "double dormer", which further conceals the flat
roof portion of the structure.
As a part of this redevelopment, the applicants have also proposed to upgrade and improve
the Town's adjacent pocket park to the norlh. The original design for the pocket park was
completed by Winston and Associates and has been recently modified by the slaff and Todd
Oppenheimer, the Town's landscape architect. Final Design Review Board approval of the
pocket park design shall be necessary.
Also included in the redevelopment, the entire structure would be brought into compliance with
all ol the current building and fire codes, (the building would be fully sprinkled).
Due to this project's location within the Gommercial Core I zone district, approval by the
Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) of a malor CGI exterior alteration is
required. The staff has reviewed the applicant's submittal, and agrees that the proposal as
redesigned would comply with all of the Town's development standards for the Commercial
Core I zone district. No variances or view corridor amendments are required for this
redevelopmenl.
II. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
. On August 27,1990, the PEC approved a major CCI exterior alteration for the
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building.
. On August 29, 1990, the Town's Design Review Board (DRB) granted final design
approval for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building. Although there is no
time limit or expiration for the previously approved major exterior alteration, the final
DRB approval for the redevelopment has expired.
. On February 14, 1994, the PEC held a joint worksession with the DRB to review the
major GCI exlerior alleration proposal.
. On February 28, 1994, the PEC held a second worksession to review the major CCI
exlerior alteration ProPosal.
' On March 2, 1994, the DRB held a conceptual review of the project.
III. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of the development standards for the proposed redevelopment of
the Covered Bridge Building:
COMMERCIAL
CORE I EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING PROJECT . PROJECT
Site Area: N/A 4,675 sq. fi. 4,675 sq. tt.
Buifdable Area: N/A 4,518 sq. tt. 4,518 sq. tt.
Selbacks: Perlhe Vail Village Urban N: 0' N: 1'
Design Guide Plan S: 1' S: 0'
E: 7' Et 14'
W: 0' W: 0'-6'
Height: 60%: 33' or less 43' lo ridge 60.5%: 33 tl. or less
40./.: 33 tr. _ 43 1. 39.5%: 33 lt. - 43 tt.
Common Area: 1,265sq. ft., 762 sq. ft. 1,265 sq ft., or35%
. tr 35% ol allowable GRFA
GRFA: 3,614 sq. tt. or 80% 0 sq. tt. , 3,614 sq. lt., or 80olo
Units: 25 unils pEr acre, 0 units 1 unil
2 unils for lhis prop€rly
Site Goverage: 3,740 sq. ft., or 8ff6 3,650 sq. n.,ot78% 3,726 sq- tt., o( 797v"
Landscaping: Per the Vail Village Urban Same Same
D6sign Guide Plan
Parking: Per the Town ot Vail Required: 22.1 spaces Fequked: 28.1 spac€s
Parking Standards
Loading: Per the Town of Vail Requited: I Required: I
Loading Slandards Existing: 0 Exisling: 0
CommerdEf Uses: N/A 8,867 sq. tt. 7,671 sq. ft'
Gross Floor Area: N/A 9,629 sq. tt. 12,550 sq' ft.
IV. CRITERTA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
The nine criteria for Commercial Core I exterior alterations shall be used to judge the merits of
this project. In addition, the PEC shall also ulilize the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan and the purpose section of the
Commercial Core I zone district.
As stated in Section 18.24.010 of the Town's Municipal Code, the purpose section of the
Commercial Core I zone district is as follows:
"The Commercial Core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the
unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges
and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environmenl.
The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light' air, open
space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and
uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urlcan design
guide plan and design considerations prescribe site development standards that
are intended lo ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly
clustered arrangemenls of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public
greenways, and to ensure continuation ol the building scale and architectural
qualities that distinguish the village."
The Planning Staff finds that the Covered Bridge Building application for a major exterior
alteration meets the Commercial Core I purpose, as stated above.
V. COMPL]ANCE WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
Although not specifically categorized as a sub-area, the Covered Bridge Building is specifically
identified in the Vail Village Master Plan as follows:
'Atthough it is a goal to maintain design continuity in the Village core, there will
be change in the core areas built environment. This is mostly due to the
number of properties that have not exercised their lull development rights. The
most notable among these properties are lhe Red Lion Building, the Cyrano's' Building, the Lodge at Vail and the Covered Bridge Building. lf each of these
and other properties developed to their full potential, there will undoubtedly be a
significant increase in the level of development in the Village core."
There are many goals, objectives, and policies which are identified in the Vail Village Master
Plan that are applicable to the development of the Covered Bridge Building. The staff leels
that the following specifically address this project:
Goal #1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique
architectural scale ol the Village in order to suslain its sense of
community and identitY.
1.2 Obiective:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
1.3 Obiective:
Enhance new development and redevelopment through public
improvements done by private developers working in cooperation with
the Town.
1.3.1 Policv:
Public improvements shall be developed with the participation of the
private sector working with the Town.
Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic
health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole.
2.4 Obiective:
Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity
where compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policy:
Commercial infill development consistent with established horizontal
zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide activity generators'
accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and streetscape improvements
to the pedestrian network throughout lhe Village.
2.5 Obiective:. Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation, and maintenance of
existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of
our guests.
Goal #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughoulthe Village.
3.1 Obiective:, Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and
other improvements.
3.1.1 Policv:
Private development projects shall incorporate slreetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and
seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
3.4 Obiectives:
Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
3.4.1 Policv:
Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall not
further restricl Public access.
Goal #4: To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspace
opportunities.
4.1 Obiective:
lmprove existing open space areas and create new plazas with
greenspace and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each
type of open space in forming the overall fabric of the Village.
4.1.2 Policv:
The development of new public plazas, and improvements to existing
plazas (public art, streetscape features, seating areas, etc.), shall be
strongly encouraged to reinforce their roles as attractive people places.
The stalf believes that the proposed redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building would
further the above Vail Village Master Plan goals and objectives.
vr. GoMPLIANCE WlrH THE STREETSCAPE U.ASTER PLAN
The Streetscape Master Plan concepts identified for lhe Covered Bridge area include the
following:
"stairs connecting Bridge Street to the pocket park and Gore Creek on the
north side of the Covered Bridge Building are needed. The pocket park should
be improved so that it could function as a picnic area or perlormance site in the
Village."
The Streetscape Master Plan addresses paving treatments in the Village as follows:
"The demarcation between the public right-of-way and private land may be
appropriate to dissolve or gmohagize., depending on the individual project site.
The result will be to create a varied street color and texture that allows private
property owners creativity, but also establishes a comprehensive design context
to work within. The primary paving material lor the right-of-way area of lhe
Village core is recommended to be the rectangular concrete unit pavers' The
herring bone pattern, which is proposed for most areas, is edged by a double
soldier course. The intent is to satisfy the need for a simple streetscape
treatment without being monolonous. The double soldier course also creates a
point lor starting and stopping pavers proposed by private developers that will
be compatible with the overall phased paving design."
Although the specific details ol the proposed streelscape and pocket park design are
described in Section Vlll of this memorandum, overall, lhe staff believes the proposed
improvemenls make a positive contribution to the quality of the area and are in compliance
with the Town's adopted Streetscape Master Plan.
vil.
The Urban Design Guide Plan Sub-Area concepts identified lor the Covered Bridge area
include a pocket park to the north of the site (with benches and planters). A "feature area"
with specialty pavers is also identified for a small area immediately southwesl ol the Covered
Bridge.
The stalf believes that the applicant's proposed modilications to the Town's pocket park,
including the viewing platform adjacent io the Covered Bridge and a new entry stair into the
park, are in conformance with the Urban Design Guide Plan Sub-Area concept and are a
positive public improvement.
vilt.
The following are the nine Commercial Core I exterior alteration design crileria, as listed in the
Urban Design Guide Plan, to be utilized by the Planning & Environmental Commission when
evaluating GCI exterior alteration proposals:
A. Pedestrianizalion
Statf believes that the proposed redesign for the Covered Bridge BuiHing will improve
the pedestrianization in the lower Bridge Street area. This section of Bridge Street is
basically a car-lree pedestrian area, however, due to the large numbers of pedestrians
utilizing this area at peak times, it is not unusual for the street to become congested.
The modifications proposed for the Covered Bridge Building, as well as the
modifications proposed for the adjacent Covered Bridge pocket park, would improve
pedestrian circulation and would also provide additional public seating areas.
The project architect has designed the building so that it would meet all the current
ADA requirements for disabled access. A "lift" would be located at the southeast
corner of the property, adjacent lo the south side of the main entry stair to the second
floor retail level. The lift would be located behind a raised planter, which will assist in
screening the lift from Bridge Street. The lift would provide disabled access to the
lowest level of the structure, as well as to the pocket park. From the lowest level, it is
possible to access the main elevator at the rear of the building. All levels of the
building, with the exception ot the fifth lloor, would be accessible from this elevator.
Staff has suggested that the design of the "lift" be modified to better reflect the alpine
character of the Village, and the applicant has agreed to modify the design, subject to
final Design Review Board approval.
At lhe request of the DRB, the applicant has redesigned the southeast corner of the
site to eliminate the exposed lower level commercial space, from the main stair, south
to the Gasthof Gramshammer. This area has been filled so that the Bridge Street
elevation would extend up to the lacg of the building, thereby enhancing the pedestrian
experience. This area would be finished with concrete unit pavers (with integral
snowmelt), in the approved Streetscape design. A raised stone planter would be
added in front (east) ol the lift, and a bench would be added to the area'
Statf believes the proposed new pedestrian access into the Covered Bridge pocket
park, as well as the proposed safety railings, will be a major improvement over the
existing conditions.
B. Vehicular Penetration
As recommended in the Urban Design Guide Plan, and in conjunction with the
pedestrianization objectives listed above, the major emphasis regarding vehicular
penetration in the Village is focused on reducing auto penetration into the center of the
Village.
Loading and delivery for the Covered Bridge Building is cunently, and will in the future,
be handled in the same manner as any other building within the Village core. All
loading/delivery vehicles are required to park in designated loading/delivery zones.
Hand carts are then necessary to lransport the goods to the individual businesses.
One particutar concern that statf, and the PEC, has identilied has to do with trash pick-
up for the Covered Bridge Building. Because the only legal access for this site is via
Bridge Street, staff is concerned that trash pick-up would occur on Bridge Street. Staff
believes that this would be very undesirable, given lhat lower Bridge Street is
considered a "no-vehicle" area. As discussed in more detail under the Service and
Delivery section of this memorandum, the staff would strongly recommend that the
owner of the Covered Bridge Building discuss with the adjacent property owner, Pepi
Gramshammer, the possibility of allowing for service access through his site.
C. Streetscape Framework
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan recommends that it would be desirable to
have a variety ol "open and enclosed spaces, both built and landscaped which create
a strong framework for pedestrian walks as well as visual interest and activity."
Further, the direction of the Guide Plan is not to enclose all Village streets with
buildings, nor is it desirable to leave pedestrian streets in an open and somewhat
undefined condition.
Staff believes that the applicant's redesign for the Covered Bridge Building creates a
positive streetscape framework for the lower Bridge Street area. Along with an
enhanced pedestrian experience in this area, the redevelopment would also creale
new commercial activity generators (i.e. additional street life and visual interest) with
the addition of the "visible" lower level commercial spaces. ln order to provide a visual
connection between the lower level retail commercial shops and Bridge Street, the
applicant has shifted the east elevation ot the structure approximately 7 feet back from
its curent location. This not only provides for a visual connection but it also allows for
landscaping to be located in front of the building. The stalf believes that the exposed
lower level commercial spaces, at the northeast corner of the structure and along the
pocket park, work well given the lower grades in the pocket park area. We support the
DRB's request to infill the southeast corner ol the site to eliminate lhe exposed lower
level commercial space, (from the main stair, south to the Gasthof Gramshammer).
Staff does not believe that split-level commercial provides a comfortable enclosure for
the street, and also does not provide the character and "Village feel" that the Design
Guidelines recommend. Staff agrees with the DRB, that the intill of this area will
enhance the pedestrian experience along lower Bridge Street.
With regard lo the architectural consideralions, the staff has reviewed the project with
the Town's design consultant Jeff Winston (Winslon and Associates). The initial
design concerns idenlified were that the majority of the slructure's mass and bulk
should be concentrated on the weslern half of the property. Additionally, staff felt that
the building should step down as il approaches lhe easlern portion of the property
(Bridge Street). Further, staff felt that the overall roof design should be simplified and
that the proposed lifth floor should be architecturally integrated into the rest of the
structure. Staff had also expressed concern regarding the relationship of the proposed
fourth and fifth lloors to the existing Gasthof Gramshammer lodge rooms (and exterior
decks) to the south.
Since the two PEC worksessions, the applicant has modified the building's design to
reduce the length of the solid wall, which would have extended out (east)
approximately 8', from the edge of the Gramshammer lourth floor deck. At the request
of the PEC, the applicant shifted lhe entire structure 5' to the west, to within 6" of the
western-most property line. Additionally, the Covered Bridge Building's fourth and fifth
floors have been pulled back, to the west, approximately 4', so that any potential
negative impacts to the Gasthof Gramshammer would be lessened, or eliminated, and
so that the relationship of the Covered Bridge Building, to Bridge Street, would also be
improved.
D. Street Enclosure
In order to provide a more comfortable street enclosure in the lower Bridge Street area,
the PEC recommended (at the initial worksession) that the applicant consider shifting
the building to the west. The applicant has complied with this request and has shifted
the building approximately 5 feet to the west, up to within 6 inches ol the western-most
property line. This modification, coupled with stepped-back fourth and fifth floors'
provides an external streel enclosure which adds visual interest, and according to stalf,
provides a very comfortable pedestrian scale, which is the desired condition in the
Village.
Due lo the Covered Bridge Building shitting to the west, the staff would recommend
that the exposed northeast elevation of the Gasthof Gramshammer, adjacent to Bridge
Street, be finished with stucco and painted to match the Gasthof Gramshammer. lt is
also recommended by staff that Mr. Gramshammer consider adding a retail window in
this wall area.
E. Street Edge
As previously mentioned, as a part of this redevelopment, the applicants have
proposed to upgrade and improve the Town's adjacent pocket park to the north, as
well as the building's frontage on Bridge Street. A total of three, raised, stone-faced
planters would be located along Bridge Street. In addition, two new planters would be
added at the lower retail level elevation, (please see the landscape plan). Plant
material proposed lor the planters would include 3 Aspen, 4 Juniper, 7 Chokeberry' 3
Alpine Current, 10 Kinnickinnick and assorted mixed-perennials. To further the Vail
Village Urban Design Considerations, the staff would recommend that the applicant
consider the addition of flower boxes to the balconies on the building.
The design for the pocket park calls for the creation of a viewing platforrn/seating area
adjacent to the Covered Bridge. The Streetscape Master Plan recommended benches,
lighting and paver design would be utilized. A new entry stair into the park would be
constructed at the southeast corner ol the park, which would provide pedestrian access
to the park and to the lower level commercial spaces in the building. The entire park
area would be re-seeded and irrigated as a part of the proposal.
In order to accommodate the redevelopment, the applicants have proposed to remove
the two existing evergreen trees which are located adjacent to the north elevation ol
the building. These trees are very close lo the building and have grown 'one-sided'.
The Town's Landscape Architect, Todd Oppenheimer, believes the two trees could not
be relocated successfully. No other vegetation is proposed to be removed with the
construction.
The Town will be responsible for maintenance of the planters located up at the Bridge
Street level, as well as maintenance of the planter and landscaping in the pocket park.
The developer of the Covered Bridge Building will be responsible for maintenance of
the lower level planter in lront of lhe building.
F. Building Height
The Vail Village Master Plan has identified this property as having an acceptable
building height in the range of three to four stories. A story is delined as 9 feet of
height and no roof is included.
This property is unique in that there is an 8-foot difference in elevation between Bridge
Street and the pocket park area north of the property. During the review ol the 1990
redevelopment proposal, the applicant had requested that stafl analyze and interprel
where building height base elevations would be calculated from. ln 1990, the statf
made the following building height interpretations, and these interprelations were
subsequently upheld by the PEC:
1. That the Covered Bridge Building site be divided equally, beginning at
the northeast corner ot the property with a line running diagonal to the
southwest corner of the property. The staff and the PEC believe that
this analysis provided for a fair and equitable review of building height
because it allows for the Bridge Street elevation of the slructure to be
based upon the grades on Bridge Street. lt also allowed lor the
elevations of the building which front north to the pocket park, and west
to Pepi's parking lot, to be based upon existing grades in the park area.
't0
2. That the base elevation of Bridge Street (8,161 feet)willbe used to
determine heights for areas of the building which fall into the
southeastern 50% of the divided property.
3. That the base elevation at the northwest corner ol the Covered Bridge
property (8,153 feet) will be used to determine building heights for the
northwest 50% of the structure.
During the PEC's 1990 review of the Covered Bridge Building redevelopment, the
drawings were submitted, and were certified, showing that the proposed design could
be built within the parameters of the height interpretation, and that the building would
not encroach inlo any Town adopted view corridor, lt was in late 1993 that the statf
learned that the 1990 approved drawings were not accurale and that the structure
could not be constructed without a height variance and a view corridor encroachment.
Although lhe stalf continues to believe that the above interpretation was an equitable
solution to a difficult problem, (given the unique topography surrounding this slructure),
the staff has acknowledged that this interpretation has driven a design solution for the
site which does not appear to be compatible with the design standards for the Village.
From a design perspective, and from a practical point of view, staff believes that a
majority of this building's upper level mass should be located towards the rear or
western portion of the site. However, the 1990 building height interpretation listed
above lorces a design solution with a majority of the building mass centered on the
property. This is necessary in order to meet the 60-40 roof area percentages.
During the February 14, 1993 PEC worksession, the PEC again reviewed this
issue, and subsequently determined that the buitding height base elevation for
the Covered Bridge property could now be calculated solely from the Bridge
Street elevation (8,161 feet). This PEC decision was based on lhe understanding
that the applicant would redesign the structure so that the entire building would be
shifted back approximately 5' to the west, and addilionally, that the 4th and 5th floors
would further step back to the west.
G. Views and Focal Points
View Corridor #1 is the view corridor trom the steps ol the Vail Village Transportation
Center extending over the Village towards Vail Mountain. This view corridor was
intended to provide unobstructed views of Vail Mountain and key architectural features
such as the Clock Tower and the Rucksack Tower.
As proposed, the highest point of the Covered Bridge Building's redesign would @!
encroach into any of the Town's adopted view corridors. In order to avoid a view
corridor encroachment, a portion of the fifth floor is designed with a flat roof. Although
this has been a very ditlicult design problem, the staff believes that the redesign of the
fifth floor roof form, and the addition of a "double dormer" adequately conceals the flat
roof from most pedestrian areas adjacent to the building. Because the project architect
has recently redesigned the roof form, at the request of the staff and PEC, the staff is
comfortable delaying the view corridor certificalion until Building Permit.
11
tx.
H. Service and Delivery
Per the Town Code, an additional loading space is not required for the redevelopment.
No loading area exists for this site. The proposal includes a trash room to be located
at the rear, or west, side of the building. Trash pickup is proposed via Bridge Street,
as this property has no legal access through the rear, or Children's Fountain area.
Again, it is strongly recommended that the applicant discuss with Pepi Gramshammer,
owner of the property to the west, the possibility of allowing for service acrcess through
his site. Pepi Gramshammer has recently submitted plans to develop his property
(currently a surface parking lot), by adding an enclosed parking garage with
approximately I lodging rooms and two condominiums above the garage.
l. Sun/Shade
The applicant has provided a sun/shade analysis for the winter solstice (Decembei
21st), and lor the spring and fall equinox (March 21st and September 21st). The
analysis was conducled for the existing building and the proposed structure, and
revealed shading patterns for 10:00 AM, 12:00 noon and 2:00 PM.
The proposed structure will cast increased shade patterns on the adjacent pocket park
site to the north and northwest. The staff believes that this additional shade will have
minimal impacts due to the fact that lhe area of the additional shading is mainly lo the
northwest of the building, and this area is heavily landscaped with large, mature
evergreen trees.
There will be some additional 'late day' shade (2:00PM) cast on approximately 4
square feet of Bridge Street, in the area of the proposed new stairs to the pocket park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends approval of the applicant's request for a major CCI exterior
alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building. The statf
finds that this redevelopment proposal, over the course of two PEC work sessions, has
developed into one which is in compliance with the Urlcan Design Considerations for
Vail Village as well as the other Comprehensive Plan elemenls described in detail
above. Stafl believes that the project will have a very positive effect on lower Bridge
Street and the entry to Vail Village. The staff's recommendation of approval includes
the following conditions:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the
redevelopment project, the applicant shall verify that the proposed roof
design does not encroach into View Corridor No. 1. This work shall be
completed by a registered surveyor in the State of Colorado.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certi{icate of
Occupancy (TCO) for the redevelopment project, the applicant shall post
a bond, cash escrow, or letter of credit, in an amount necessary to
insure the completion of any outstanding improvemenls, not completed
12
al the time of the requested TCO. Said guarantee for completion of any
outstanding improvements shall be in accordance with Section
17.16.250 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
That prior to the Toirun's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy (TCO) for the redevelopment project, the applicant shall
grant a pedestrian and landscape maintenance easement to the Town
for the purposes of pedestrian access to the pocket park and
maintenance ol the planters and pocket park landscaping.
That the applicant add "divided lights" to the retail doors on the first and
second levels of the structure, subject to DRB approval.
That the applicant add flower boxes to the balconies on the building'
subject to DRB approval.
That the exposed northeast elevation of the Gasthof Gramshammer,
adjacent to Bridge Street, be linished with stucco and painted to match.
It is recommended by staff that a retail window be cut into this wall.
4.
5.
6.
c:\pecvnemo6\bridge. 3r 4
13
@HNE
Y=-"
FT
o
z
I
t
tIi
6
III
^t'.
=a--Effi
l!"""" Iq---"
.l,irfi,l
gilj::i*ffi,
.)i-ii{i
_l
00v8010t "Iv
1338IS 390irE /ZZ
9Nt01n8 3C0tu8 03ul^ocNl.ld SdvSscN\al
tl<l\,-J
-l I
aII
3tI
I
i
i:I}r9
ir
i$
olrl9
frz>a
9d\./D
6F
IrlFl
Q(,
F(la
F
I!
F
oo
06vuo'rol "lv^
ll3uls 3901u€ 1zz
gNrolrn8 3901u8 03U3AOC @iloil
Ii!
aI
.!
t
9l
?I
tq
i
-
t
a
d
e3
It
It
t,
3t
!t
I
@
|JI
arl'l
?l
3l
I
b0
trl
Ehgli-t-
I
o o,
HF
Gl,fr| c?99t<
EH'
EFI
--iz- /'-/ e-
- sq-'cd
tZIEI' E;,lf;'- -3r 1
o ;{5il3
5g
t-
f,l
frl
fr
t-,t
U]
F]
U
aHg
n
,'eF'
6
g
c,
:
I
I
s
I6
I
q'
o:(,
Il|clIo
.l
c
I(,
o
.0
c.l
e
.5
t\
I
o
o
YIJ
o
I
I
-T
Y_
ss-t-t*s3o
$_ET
$$\5
i*
tT
g=
E$
J-'
9-s5s
\l-l
+'l'
'=
o
$l -'
$$il
I
I
I
u7/,6'tL
e$6Ttlr.{
:fo
lr
o1l It"otlluxTr+ittI00
i
g
,2tr b'1L
$
7.
\
i-
{.
,r
t\J
-J
N
F
0
t$l
P/,b'P ,z/tl'l''
9t\j
"1"
I+
\l'l
a.l
$l
FI,$if
i-g
i$
i*
I .u-
hE
H$,
(,
I
JTI
\\
F
bt
ulD
r+-Ed"
o
tltn* tP t tlq{
e"ue,/ I E. F,
Pz e, **f 6^;-r7c /7*t /ft*l /A';/J7
oFt[-f, ffitrFY
Kathy Langenwalter asked that the four evergreen trees be relocated so that the trees
would be located along the back of the proposed addition.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the requested side and rear setback variances
per the staff memo with Conditions 3 and 4 being deleted as conditions of aPproval.
Greg Amsden seconded the motion and a 7-0 vote approved this item.
3, A request for a worksession for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the
redevelopment of the ||-;f;Cf|q located at227 Bridge StreeVLots C and
D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a presentation to the PEC and stated that the purpose ol this
worksession was to discuss the progress that has been made with the requested major
CCI exterior alteration. He stated that the fifth floor was a significant issue on this site'
Jeff winston, the Town's design consultant, stated that he had spoken with the
appliqants and staff several times since the February 14, 1994 PECworksession. He
said that there were still some concerns with the proposed mansard and flat roof
forms.
Mike Mollica stated that fifth floor double dormers would be repeated on the back side
of the building as well as the front.
Jeff Winston stated that the double dormers were positive. He stated that in his
opinion, a view corridor encroachment still appeared to be the most favorable solution
for this site.
Ned Gwathmey stated that they would like to find a solution that would allow the
applicants to proceed with construction activity on April 15, 1994. He stated that he
felt that he had designed a solution that would work for the site without necessitating a
view corridor encroachment.
Bill Anderson stated that the double dormer approach was positive. He stated that the
architects had done a good job modifying this request since the February 14, 1994
PEC worksession. He stated that changing the tifth floor roof line was an
improvement. He said that he would support a view corridor encroachment lor this
site.
Bob Armour stated he would be in favor of a view corridor encroachment.
Kristan Pritz suggested that the PEC keep the view corridor encroachment criteria in
mind, during this discussion.
Pbnnlng rnd Envlronmcnttl Commi3llon
Fcbrurty 28, 199{
Mike Mollica reviewed the five view corridor encroachment criteria and the purpose
section of View Corridor #1 to the PEC.
After hearing the criteria; Bill stated that he was still supportive of the view corridor
encroachment.
Greg Amsden stated thal he would support a view corridor encroachment as long as
the Covered Bridge Building's roof line did not extend past or above that ol the
adjacent Gasthof Gramshammer Building.
Jetf Bowen stated that he agreed with Greg's comments. He stated that a sloped roof
would be preferable to a llat roof and that the addition of the double dormers was
positive. He said that he would support a view corridor encroachment.
Allison Lassoe stated that she favored the peaked roof but preferred no view corridor
encroachment.
Dalton Williams stated that either of the two roof forms were acceptable to him. He
added that a single peaked roof was preferable to a double dormer approach. He said
that he could support a view corridor encroachment.
Kathy Langenwalter felt that the double dormer/flat roof design would be acceptable,
as the flat roof would not be visible, and further stated that she would not support a
view corridor encroachment. ,
Ned Gwathmey stated that they would pursue the double dormers. He said that he
would prefer not to pursue the view corridor encroachment'
Pepi Gramshammer stated that he was concerned with the ice build-up between the
two buildings and that he would like to see this issue addressed along with the current
request before the PEC.
Ned Gwathmey stated that they would slope the roof away from Pepi's building to
solve the ice build-up problem.
Greg Amsden inquired what Pepi was proposing to do with the back of his building.
Kathy Langenwalter asked Pepi if he would work wilh the applicants on the exposed
lront wall area (on Bridge Street).
Ned Gwathmey stated that the building has a trash holding room for the entire buiHing
and they will have the ability to bring trash around the building and bring it up on the
lift. He stated that trash cans would not be lelt on Bridge Street.
Kathy Langenwalter suggested that the Covered Bridge Building could be restricted so
that a restaurant could not be located on the site, due to the extensive amounts ol
trash generated with such use.
Plsnnlng and Envl.onmeoial commltllon
Fobtutry 28,1994 4
Ned Gwathmey stated that he would need to discuss this issue with the applicanls.
Dalton Williams asked Pepi how he proposed to take care of trash for his building.
Pepi stated that he did not have enough room on his siie to get involved with the trash
situation at the Covered Bridge Building. He stated that he did not feel restricting
restaurants in the Covered Bridge Building was appropriate.
Mike Mollica asked Pepi whether he would consider allowing the Covered Bridge
Building owners lo have access to trash trucks via his property.
Pepi stated that he was completely opposed to becoming involved with the disposal of
the Covered Bridge Building's trash.
Jeff Bowen stated that he would like to see the trash disposal for both buildings
coordinated in such a way that trash trucks would not be on Bridge Street.
Dalton Williams staled that he did not want to see the PEC put a use restriction on a
building that could not be removed in the future.
Allison Lassoe slated that she was concerned about the trash trucks coming down
Bridge Street. She stated there were also safety issues associated with a trash truck
backing down a narrow road. She stated that a deed restriction (for use) did not seem
necessary at this time.
Jeff Bowen stated that a partnership between Pepi and East West Partners to address
trash disposal, would be beneficial for all concerned parties.
Greg Amsden felt that East West Partners would address trash disposal properly, as
they do in Beaver Creek. He stated that a deed restriction was not necessary'
Mike Mollica stated that staff was concerned that the proposed window design may not
meet the Design Guidelines for the Village.
. Kathy Langenwalter stated that the upper floor windows possibly could be broken up
but that relailwindows needed to be able to be retail windows, i.e. the panes should
provide lor the display of merchandise. Other commissioners agreed with Kathy.
Jeff Winston stated that the small window panes that are present on many of the
buildings give Vail a unique feeling. He stated that small window panes should be
located around doors.
It was suggested that the applicant use smaller panes on the doors.
Plsnning sod Enviionmonld Commlllion
February 24, 1004
I
2'27. 74 7EC 14,/9
'| I tfl4 - qr,U /^ y^X 4,t.-._/
>"Zt^ ,- 0K .-/ :r;./,q ")4-*;^. A a;t. ( / /
-f/--r{ r'r*-^,^ D4",4 i
'/ /
Klr/f - 4 f /,,/n K,^"".2A 7
aa-_-,r _rr(,
;
K4 - "".*'4 ry ft fr ,&**4//.x ---'-7
i;
iivo rt.1 a> ,ffiI. M ft*,ttl, [/ | /
/;tr
aft
b?
w
1r/7/
A/hi
& 4y1t4r*b/^/ " Q,A/.-/,f")
T/"*/ /^,'*-- fuf
u'.'
0f /,;Jr* p. dK
a>ah*a
o
3.A request for a loint worksession with the PEC and DRB for ? p?jot CCI exterior
nnFI'
alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the aI227
Bridge StreeVlots C and D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a presentation per the staff memo. He stated that this proposed
redevelopment involves no variances at this time. He summarized Section lX'
Discussion, of the staff memo.
Ned Gwathmey, the architect for this project, stated that they have been \vrestling with
this site' since 1990. He said that the applicant has spent a great deal of time
studying the feasibility of this project.
Bill Anderson stated that the view conidor line should be adjusted to accommodate a
sloped roof for the Covered Bridge Building. He also supported moving the building 5
feet to the west property line.
Saundra Spaeh, architect represenling Pepi Gramshammer, stated that Pepi was
concerned with the fifth floor.
Greg Amsden stated that he was concerned with the proposed staging area in the
pocket park.
Mike Mollica explained the staging plan to the PEC.
Ned Gwathmey stated that they had approached Pepi about doing the Covered Bridge
Building construction at the same time as Pepi's building is under construction.
Saundra Spaeh stated that Pepi is adamant about not using the area behind his
building as the staging area for this project.
Greg Amsden inquired whether moving the building height interpretation line was an
option.
Mike Mollica stated that staff was open to amending the line and discussed the statf's
reas0ns.
Peter Dan, of East West Partners, staled that the applicants were open to shifting the
lourth and fifth floors to the west.
Allison Lassoe inquired whether the building height interpretation line could be moved
horizontally.
Ned Gwathmey stated that such a change to the project would delay construction for at
least one year.
Plannlng llld Ervlronmfi|!l Commladon .
F.btulty la' 1994
r lt r| :t I
Dalton Williams asked the applicant that if the project was approved, could they be
flexible on which root form they used, depending on whether an encroachment into
View Corridor #1 is approved.
Ross Bowker stated that this would be okay with them.
Bob Borne, DRB representative, asked whether the building would be out of the view
corridor if the buibing was shifted back 5 feet to the west.
Mike Mollica stated that the building would still be located in the view corridor.
Jeff Winston, the Town's design consullant, stated that he lelt moving the building back
5 feet would help this project. He questioned whether the whole building would have
to be moved back.
Ned Gwathmey stated that they could not do this and still satisfy the ADA requirements
for disabled access.
Jeff Winston stated that a small portion of flat roof may be acceptable but that it must
not appear to be flat. He said that another concern that he had was that the buiHing
did not appear to be one piece of architecture and he suggested that the applicant lie
the roofs'together in some way so that the different sections of the building do not look
so segmented. He stated that the Town did not intend for the line of View Conidor #1
to etfect this site in the way that it has. He would like to see the upper portion ol the
building be reworked in order to avoid the flat roof as well as tie it to the rest of the
building. He said that the proposed design of the building resembles the Gateway
Building and that the architectural design needed to relale better to the Village core'
Jeff suggested a more unified approach to the building. He added that he also
supported the applicant pursuing an encroachment into View Corridor #1
Dalton Williams supported changing the building height interpretation line, or
eliminating it entirely.
Mike Mollica stated that the PEC and staff have some llexibility to modify the line. He
stated that the 60%-40% for roofs was a hard and fast standard that had to be
followed. A variance would be required if the roof departed from this standard.
Sally Brainerd, DRB representative, stated that her concerns are mainly wilh the
slorefront. she is concerned with the split-level retail. she stated that the building
design is not in keeping with Vail's guidelines. She stated that she did not feel the
separatbness of the upper levels was ideal. She agreed with Dalton's comments about
the building height.
Bob Borne agreed with Dalton's comments. He added that he was concerned about
the construction activity occuning during the summer.
Pbnning rtld Environmenbl Comrisdon
F.bruery t4, 1904
Bill Anderson staled that he agreed with the previous comments concerning the roof
height line. He said that he would like to see the building go back to the west at least
5 feet. He added that the staging tor this site would be difficult. He added that he
understood Ned's concerns about proceeding through the variance process. Bill said
he would be willing to approve the project if Ned brought the roof issue back to the
PEC for a view corridor encroachment assuming the top portions of the buibing were
shifted to the west.
Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see the building height interpretation line
moved. She said the building needs to be moved back and that this will help widen
Bridge Street in this area. She lelt the criteria for view corridor encroachment could be
met but not if the view conidor line became the height limit. She stated that an
altemate location would need to be determined for trash removal and that it should not
be via Bridge Street.
Greg Amsden stated that he did not want to see the building height interpretation line
set it this stage ot the game. He was in favor of shifting the building back. He added
that he would like to see the staging area located to the west of the Covered Bridge
Building.
Jefl Bowen stated that the view corridor has been considered lrom the Transportation
Center and that the view lrom upper Bridge Street is also atfected. He said that he
would like to see a different roof form. He added that he would like to see the building
dropped down from the north so that the building will appear less massive.
Allison Lassoe said she would like to see the building pulled back 5 feet and that this
would help the building appear less massive. She stated that she felt that Dalton's
previous suggestion could help the roofs for this project.
Dalton Williams inquired whether there was a way to internalize the trash removal on
the Bridge street. He said that he likes the way the front of the building looks pushed
back but that he is concerned what that would do to the Bridge Street shopping
experience.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she agreed with the other Board members comments.
She added that more integration of the roof forms is needed. She is concerned about
how the roof lorm will look. She said that shifting the building back 5 feet is positive.
She stated that trash removal will be difficult because this site is "land locked". She
added that the staging for this project will be difficult and she did not feel that it would
be acceptable to lose a mature tree due to construction staging. She said lhat she felt
that there was a way to do this project without a height variance. She stated that the
diagonal line could be stepped.
Ned Gwathmey stated that he did not want to advise his clients to go lorward with this
variance. He said that it would be helpful for them to have an interpretation of the
ordinances from the PEC. He said that this site is very tight.
Phnrlng ||d Erwhon mcott I Commbrlon
F€brutry 14,1994
Dalton Williams suggested that they. eliminate the diagonal line and go off of Bridge
Street with lhe 60/"-4Q/" and a view coridor encroachmenl'
All the members of the PEC agreed that this was acceptable.
Ned stated that this would not necessarily help them get this project going.
Kristan PriE stated that staff had sat down with the architects for this project previourly
and it was deemed by the Town Attorney that a modification to lhe 60/o-40/o rule i+'
not possible without a variance.
Peter Dan stated that he would like to shift the building back and go off of Bridge
Street to determine heights. He added that they would like lo connect the roofs on the
fourth and fifth floors together.
Bob Borne summarized that the applicant wants to get this project going and that the
main issue seems to be the roof and that the PEC seemed to be generally in lavor of
the design of the building and that some caveat be made regarding the roof.
Jeff Bowen stated that the Covered Bridge Building is the entrance to Bridge Street
and the Village and that he would like to see the building mass lessened, the building
shifted back, and the roof element changed.
Jeff Winston stated that the building design was a result of the diagonal line and that if
the line were to be eliminated, then the roof forms could be integrated.
Kathy Langenwalter inquired about the transition of siding to stucco'
Dalton Williams made a molion that the PEC has reviewed the prior PEC determination
regarding the building height interpretations and that alter careful review, and that
since View Corridor No. 1 determines the Covered Bridge Building maximum height'
the building is restrained by the view coridor. Due to this, the height calculation can
be taken lrom Bridge Street with the understanding that the mass will be pushed to the
west and that the building be stepped back.
Greg Amsden seconded the motion.
Kathy Langenwaller restated Dalton Williams motion,
A 7-0 vote approved the height determination from Bridge Streel as staled above.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that there were still issues and details that had not been
discussed at this worksession which would need to be discussed in two weeks.
Pllnnlng lnd Envlronmentrl comrrltdon .
February 14, 1994
-til I [?rY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUII
Planning and Environmental Gommission
Community Development Department
Village lst Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
February 14, 1994
A request for a lolnt worlcesslon with the PEC and DRB for a major CCI
extdtior alteration to allow for the redevelopment ol the Covered Bridge Buiffiing
focated at227 Bfidge streevLoF c and D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8. Vail
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Mike Mollica
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicants are proposing a major redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located
al22i Btidge Street. The project would be considered a 'demo/rebuild'which would involve
the demolition and removal of the existing slructure and the construction ol the proposed
building on this site. The proposal calls for major design modifications to the front entrance
(east eievation) of the existihg commercial spaces, the creation of lower level commercial
ipaces which would be directly accessible lrom stairs directly on Bridge Street, the infill of the
northwest section of the property, the addition of an elevator at the west end of the building'
and the addition of two upper level floors to accommodate one condominium. The Bridge
Street (east) elevation of the structure has been shifted approximately 3 feet back from its
curr€nt location.
As a part of this redevelopment, the applicanls have also proposed to upgrade and improve
.
the Town's adiacent pocket park to the north. The design for the pocket park was completed
by Winston and Associates and has been approved by Todd Oppenheimer, the Town's
landscape architect. Finat Design Review Board approval of the pocket park design shall be
necessary.
Also included in the redevelopment, the entire structure would be brought into compliance with
all of the cunent building and fire codes, (the building would be fully sprinkled).
Due to this proiect's location within the Commercial Core I zone district, approval bythe
Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) of a malor GCI exterior alteration is
required. The statf has reviewed the applicant's submittal, and agrees that the proposal as_
Oeiigned would comply wiilr all of the Town's development standards for the Commercial Gore
I zone district. No variances or view corridor amendments are requested as a part of this
application.
t\
II. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
On August 27, 1990, the PEC approved a major CCI exterior alteration for the redevelopment
of the Covered Bridge Building. On August 29, 1990, the Town's Design Review Board (DRB)
granted final design approval for the redevelopmsnt of the Covered Bridge Building. Although
there is no time limit or expiration for the previously approved maior exterior alteration, the
final DRB approval for the redevelopment has expired.
III. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary ol the development standards for the proposed redevelopment of
the Covered Bridge Building:
Sile Area:
Buildable Area:
S€lbacks:
Heighl:
Common Ar€a:
GRFA:
Unils:
Site Coverage:
Landscaping:
Pa*ing:
Loading:
Commerdd Uses:
Gross Floor Area:
COMMERCIAL
COFE I
ZONING
N/A
tl/A
EXISTING
PRO'ECT
4,675 €q. ft.
t1,518 sq. n.
Per lhe Vail VillagB Ulban N:
D€sign Guide Plan S:
E,
w:
o
7'
o
PROPOSED
PROJECT
4,675 sq. n.
4,518 3q. tl.
N: l'S: 0'E: 9'-6'W: 5'-6'
60.1%: 3il tt. or less
39.9%:3il ft. - 43 tl.
I,265 sq. tl.
3,614 sq. fl., or 8(P/.
1 unil
3,726 sq. tt., q 79.7%
Same
Required: 28.2 rpaces
Requircd: 1
Existing: 0
7,703 sq. fi.
12,582 eq. ft.
6070: 3l]' or l€ss t|:}' lo ridge
rO%: 33 ft. - 43 ft.
1,265 sq. n., 762 sq. ft.
or 357o ol allowable GRFA
3,614 sq. fl. or 807o 0 sq. lt.
25 unils per acre, 0 unils
2 unil. lor lhis prop€.ly
3,740 sq. tt., o. 80% 3,650 sq. tl.. q 789"
P€r the Vail Village Urban Samo
Design Guide Phn
Per the Town ol Vail Required: 22..| cpaces
Pa*ing Slandards
Por the Town ol Vail Roquired: I
toading Slandards Existing: 0
N/A 8,867 3q. n.
tVA 9,629 sq. lt.
IV. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
The nine criteria lor Commercial Core I sxterior alterations shall be used to judge the merits of
this project. In addition, the PEC shall also utilize the Vail Village Master Plan, the Urban
Design Guide Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan and he purpose section of the Commercial
Core I zone district.
As stated in Section 18.24.010 of the Town's Municipal Gode, the purpose section of the
Commercial Core I zone district is as follows:
'The Commercial Gore ldistrict is intended to provide sitss and to maintain ths
unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixturs of lodges
and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment'
The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open
space, and other am€nities and appropriate to the permitted $pes of buildings. and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urban
design guide plan and design considerations prescribe site development
standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the
tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and
public greenways, and lo ensure continuation of the building scale and
architectural qualities that distinguish the village."
V. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
Although not specifically categorized as a sub-area, the Covered Bridge Building is specilically
identified in the VailVillage Master Plan as follows:
"Although it is a goal to maintain design continuity in the Village core, there will
be change in the core areas built environment. This is mostly due to the
number ot properties that have not exercised their full development rights. The
most notable among these properties are the Red Lion Building, the Cyrano's
Building, the Lodge at Vail and the Covered Bridge Building. lf each of lhese
and other properties developed to their full potential, there will undoubtedly be a
significant increase in the level of development in the Village core."
There are many goals, objectives, and policies which are identified in the Vail Village Master
Plan that are applicable to the development ol the Covered Bridge Building. The staff feels
that the following specifically address this project:
Goal #1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while pr€serving the unique
architectural scale of lhe Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and identity.
1.2 Obiective:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
1.3 Obiective:
Ennance new dwelopment and redevElopment through public
improvements done by private developers working in cooperalion with
the Town.
1.3.1 Policv:
Public improvsments shall be developed with the participation of the
private sector working with the Town.
Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic
health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole.
2.4 Obiective:
Encourage the development of a variety of norrr commercial activity
where compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policv:
Commercial inlill development consistgnt with established horizontal
zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provids activity generators,
accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and stre€tscape improvements
to the pedestrian network throughout the Village.
2.5 Obiective:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation, and maintenance of
existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of
our guests.
Goat #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughout the Village.
3.1 Obiective:
Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and
other improvements.
3.1.1 Policv:
Private development Projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lightlng and
seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
3.4 Obiectives:
Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible
green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access'
3.4.1 Policv:
Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall not
further restrict Public access.
Goal #4: To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspace
oPPortunities,
4.1 Obiective:
lmprove existing open space areas and creale neu, plazas with
greenspace and pocket parks. Recognizs the differenl roles of each
type of open space in forming the overall fabric of the Village.
4.1.2 Policy:
The devetopment of new public plazas, and improvements to existing
plazas (public art, streetscape fealures, seating areas, etc'), shall be
strongly encouraged to reinforce lheir roles as attractive people places.
VI. COMPLIANCE WITH THE STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN
The Streetscape Master Plan concepts identilied for the Covered Bridge area include the
lollowing:
'Stahs connecting Bridge Street to the pocket park and Gore Creek on the
north side of the Covered Bridge Building are needed. The pocket park should
be improved so that it could function as a picnic area or performance site in the
Village."
The Streetscape Master Plan addresses paving treatments in the Village as follows:
"The demarcation between the public right-of-way and private land may be
appropriate to dissolve or emphasize, depending on the individual project sile.
The iesult will be to create a varied street color and texture that allows private
property owners creativity, but also establishes a comprehensive design context
to work within. The primary paving material for the right-of-way area ol the
Village core is recommended to be the rectangular concrete unil pavers. The
herring bone pattem, which is proposed for most areas, is edged by a double
soldier course. The intent is to satisfy the need for a simple slreetscape
treatment without being monotonous. The double soldier course also creates a
point lor starting and stopping pavers proposed by private developers that will
be compatible with the overall phased paving design"'
vil. GoMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN FOR VAIL VILLAGE
The Urban Design Guide Plan Sub-Area concepts identilied for the Covered Bridge area
include a pocket park to the north of lhe site (with benches and planters). A "feature area"
with specialty pavers is also identified for a small area immediately southwest of the Covered
Bridge.
The staff believes that the applicant's proposed modilications to the Town's pocket park,
including the viewing platform adjacent to the Covered Bridge and a new entry slair into the
park, would be in conformance with the Urban Design Guide Plan Sub-Area concept and are
a positive public improvem€nt.
VIII. COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERANONS FOR VAIL VILLAGE
The following are the nine Commercial Core I exterior alteration design criteria as listed in the
Urlcan Design Guide Plan.
Pedestrianization
Vehicular Penetration
Streetscape Framework
Street Enclosure
Slreet Edge
Building Height
Views and Focal Points
Service and Delivery
Sun/Shade
rx. prscussroN
Because this a joint worksession with the DRB and tre PEG, the staff will not specifically
address each ol the exterior alteration criteria listed above. The statf would propose however,
ftat the PEC and the DRB focus their discussions regarding his redwelopmenl on the
following issues:
A. Bulldlng Helght and Masslng:
The Vail Village Master Plan has identified this property as having an acceptable range
of building heights in the three to lour story category. A building height is defined as 9
feet of height and no roof is included.
There is an 8-foot diflerence in height between Bridge Street and the pocket park area
north ol the property. During the review of the 1990 proposal, the applicant had
requested that staff analyze and intetpr€t where building height base elevations would
be calculated from. ln '1990, the staff made the following building height
interpretations, and these interpretations were subsequendy upheld by the PEC:
1. That the Covered Bridge Building site be divided equally, beginning at
the northeast corner ot the prop€rty with a line running diagonal to the
southwest corner of th6 property. The staff and the PEC believe lhat
his analysis provided for a fiair and equitable review of building height
because it allows for the Bridge Street elevation of the structure to be
based upon the grades on Bridge Street. lt also allowed for the
elevations of the building which front north to the pocket park, and west
to Pepi's parking lot, to be based upon existing grades in the park area.
2. That the base elevation ol Bridge Street (8,161 feet) willbe used to
determine heights for areas of the building which fall into the
southeastern 50% of the divided property.
3. That the base elevation at the northwest corner of the Covered Bridge
property (8,153 feet) will be used to determine building heights for the
northwest 50% of the slructure.
During the PEC's 1990 revisw of the Covered Bridge Building redevelopment, the
drawings were submitted, and were certified, showing that the proposed design could
be built within the parameters of the height interpretation, and that the building would
not encroach into any Town adopled view corridor. lt was in late 1993 that the statf
learned that tre 1990 approved drawings were not acturate and that the structure
could q! be constructed without a height variancs and a view corridor encroachment.
Although the staff continues to believe that the above interpretation is an equitable
solution to a difftcult problem, (given the unique topography surounding this structure),
the stalf does acknowledgs that this interpretation has driven a design solution for the
site which does not appear to be compatible with the design standards lor the Village'
From a design perspective, and from a practical point of visw, staff believes that a
majoiity of this building's upper level mass should be located towalds the rear or
westsrn portlon of the site. However, the above building height interpretation forces a
design solution with a majority of the building mass centered on the property. This is
necessary in order to meet the 60-40 roof area percentages.
The staft has recently discussed with the applicant the possibility of modifying the
building height interpretation in order to achieve a design which is more compatible
with the Town's design guidelines, and which would not negatively impact adjacent
properties. Staff has suggested modifying the 1990 height interpretalion so that the
"building height line" would divide the property east and west through the site. Given
the design considerations, the statf would like further direction from the PEC regarding
lhe 1990 height interpretation.
B. Vlew Corrldor f1
View Corridor #1 is the view corridor lrom the steps ol the Vail Village Transportation
Center extending over the Village towards Vail Mountain. This view corridor was
intended to provide unobstructed views ol Vail Mountain and key architectural lealures
such as the Clock Tower and the Rucksack Tower.
As proposed, the highest point of the Covered Bridge Building's redesign would 4!
encroach into any of the Town's adopted view corridors. Howsver, it should be noted
ftat a tairly significant portion of the fifth floor is designed with a flat root. The
applicant maintains that the flat roof design is necessary so that the structure would
not encroach into View Corridor #1, while still providing for a fifth floor.
The applicants have presented an optional sloped roof lor the fifth floor, which will be
presented with the scale model at the PEC meeting. This sloped roof option does
however, involve a view corridor encroachment of approximately 4-6 feet. The
applicants have stated that architecturally, they prefer the sloped roof design, and that
given support by the PEG for a view corridor encroachment, they would file an
application to encroach into View Corridor #1.
C. ArchltecturalConslderatlons
In order to provide a visual connection between the lower le\tel retail commercial shops
and Bridge street, lhe applicant has proposed to shift the east slevation ol the
structursapproximately 3 feet back from its current location. This not only provides for
a visual connection but it also allows for landscaping to be located in front ol the
building.
With regard to the architectural considErations, the stafl has revievved thE project with
the Town's design consultant Jeff Winston (Winston and Associates). As previously
stated, stafl believes that the m4ority ol this structure's mass and bulk should be
concentraled on the western hall of the property. Additionalty, we feel that the building
should step down as it approaches th€ eastern portion ot the property (Bridge Street),
and that the building should'also step down as it approachss the pocket park to the
north. Further, we feel that the overall roof design should be simplified and that he
proposed fitth floor should be further architecturally integrated into the rest ol the
stucture.
Staff has also expressed concem regarding the relationship of the proposed fourth and
fifth floors to the existing Gasthof Gramshammer lodge rooms (and exterior d€cks) to
the south. The current design creates a solid wallwhich would extend oul (east)
approximately 8'from the edge of fie Gramshammer fourth floor deck. Staff fsels that
the Covered-AriOge Building's fourth and fifth floors should be pulled back, to the west'
so that the impaci to the Gasthof Gramshammer would be lessened, or eliminated, and
so that the relationship of the Covered tsridge Building, to Bridge Street, would also be
improved.
Other architectural considerations, as listed in the Urban Design Considerations'
include:
.Boofs - pitch, overhang and materials.
.Facades - transparency, windows, doors, trim, materials' color.
.Balconies/Decks ' size, mass, color and matsrials.
.Accent Elements - signs, awnings, flags, accent lighting, painted wall graphics,
flower boxes, elc.
D. Landscape Corciderations
As previously mentioned, as a part of this redevelopment, the applicants have
proposed to upgrade and improve the Town's adiacent pocket park to the norlh' as
weli as the building's frontage on Bridge Street. Two new planters would be located
on Bridge Street. The applicant is investigating the possibility of eliminating the railing
along Biidge Street and providing a two tiered planter that could lunction as an
attraitive ptanter barrier. The design for the pocket park calls fqr th9 creation of a
viewing platform/seating area adjacent to the Covered Bridge. The Streetscape Master
Plan r&ommended benches, lighting and pavers would be utilized. A new entry stair
into the park would be constructed at the southeast corner ol the park, which would
provide pedostrian access lo the park and to the lower level commercial spaces in the
building.
In order to accommodate the redevelopment, the applicants have proposed to remove
the two existing evergr€en trees which are located adjacent to the north elevation of
the building. These tre€s are very close to the building and have grown "one-sided".
The Town'i Landscape Architect, Todd Oppenheimer, believes the two trees could not
be relocat€d successfully.
Because construction staging lor the Covered Bridge site is very confined, the staff has
requested a staging plan at this level of the planning review. As a part of the
construction staging.plan, which includes the Town's pocket park, the applicant has
requested that they be allowed to relocate one large evergreen tree to another location
in the pocket park. The evergreen in question is approximately 40-45' tall. The intent
of the iree relocation is to provide a pad for the conslruction crane. Although the
staging site is very restricted, tor construction purposes, the statf is opposed to
allowing the applicant to attempt to relocate the evergreen'
Other landscape considerations, as listed in the Urtran Design Considerations, include:
.Plant Materials - trees, shrubs and annual flowering plants.
"Paving - concrete unit pavers (streetscape design) vs' asphalt.
.Retaining Walls - height, materials.
E. Sun/Shade Analysis
The applicant has provided a sun/shade analysis for the winter solstice (December
21st), and for the spring and tall equinox (March 21st and September 21st). The
analysis was conducled for the existing building and the proposed structurs, and
revealed shading patterns lor 10:00 AM, 12:00 noon and 2:00 PM'
The proposed structure will cast increased shade patterns on the adjacent pocket park
site io me north and northwest. The staff believes trat this additional shade will have
minimal impacts. The area of the additional shading is mainly to the northwest of tho
building and is heavily landscaped with large, mature evergreen trees.
There will be some additional shade cast along Bridge Street in th€ area of the
proposed viewing platform/seating area,
F. Service and Delivery
Per the Town Code, an additional loading space is not required. No loading area
exists for this site. The proposal includes a trash room tO be located at the rear, or
west, side of the building. Trash pickup would be via Bridge Street, as tttis property
has no legal access through the rear, or Ghildren's Fountain area. lt is suggested that
the applicant discuss with Pepi Gramshammer, owner of the property to the wesl, the
possiOitity ol allowing for service access through his site. Pepi Gramshammer is
currently considering developing his property (cunently a surface parking lot), by
adding an enclosed parking garage with lodging rooms and several condominiums
above the garage.
G. ADA ComPllance
The project architect has designed the building so that it would meet all the cunent
ADA'requirements for disabled :rccess. A "lift'would be located at the southeast
corner oi the property, which would provide access to the lowest level ol tho structure'
From this point, ii is possible to acc€ss the main olevator at ths rear of the property.
All levels 6t tne ouito'ing, with the exception of the fifth floor, would be acc€esible from
this ele\tator.
A cut sheet of the "lifl" is attached to this memorandum, staff has suggested that th€
design of the "lift' be modified to better reflect the character of tha Village. The
applicant has agreed to look into this.
c:\p3cvncm6btidga.2l,l
10
M @E]NE
--+'
,'1-tt - -' i
BI
h
=E.fl
HI
@l6o
F99uF
F3F
:EH
5';
;3
/roul. c?',6'r
tl
\
h!l
e
ft
h
0
H
0
eH
R
a
otrl/
T
i(lllrll
'i tll
;ll,tl
@l.illlitl
tr :1
liliilttl
Ejl
lll
1ll
ltl
Jil
--r--=-_-_-_-_-_-_-l-_-_-_-_-_.ri iItlrtl
rirrl _<_J___
"#
M MilTtr
|r
u
rqr
iEl
o
w$
\$
M MnrE
'li
iEl'
Jlo
w$
\$
ll
l-€
oo
M MMil[tr
..,li
Hti:l
El
O
oo
oovlr6l@ 1rA
E3UIS 3o0tu8 tzz
cNro'ltn8 3o0tu8 03u3AOC
"li
s|'
El
O
@ilrE
rl
l lttl
ooo
"lfr-ll iFi-ii-
dfr.f l o*,ot,nr roo,r, or'rrno,-l@fl il f E
tr,trD
oo
oowfio3'TV
J:l38lS SCO|US IZZ
cNtolln8 3c0tu8 03u3^o3 @ilTE
El'
oI?
.-€
I
-1-€
Ii-€
,,0-.9618 0 :r,olu
/l
.F.l
o'b:
L
:-o
lclx
Jf;I
o,
c-ot
lz-\ll=-l' .I lll + |\Jl'< |
lg
I
I
e
'1,
I
t
Jt
,a
tr ttti l!
rtfi
ll
.l
I
iI
I
il
I
l
I
I*i
I
I
I
-l
I
-. EF
T,fl*
F
!r
I
Itt
o
O
trIWne
frl n terms ol normal day-to-day*J mobility, stairways can present a
significanl problem lo the physically
challenged.
lnclinator Co. of America, lor 70years one of th€ leading
manufactu rers of residential elevalors
and slair litts, has a cost-eftective
solution lo the accessibility problems
laced by people wilh physical
limitations. Our LIFI-ette is a durable,
lotrquality, superior designed verlical
platform lift capable of lifting a wheel-
chair, its occupanl and an atiendant,
up lo twefue feel.
Whelher it's gaining access to a
building or rioving from floor to floor,
the LlFIcIte can be adapted for botr
indoor and ouldoor usage, making it
pertecl for schools, churches, meeting
halls, office buildings, and residences.
Every LIFT-ette is conslructed in
accordance with the Inclinator
Company's well-known guidelines for
quality assurance.
Breakthrough engineering, which
has becorne lhe hallmark ol lrrclinator
over the years, has allowed us to
creale a specially designed, quielly
operating model. In addition, it's easy
lo install and service. As with all
Inclinator products, the LlFfcile can
be expected lo deliver years of
dependable service. For turther
information, visit your nearesl
Inclinator dealer or contact us directli.
INCTINATOR
;il::"H F\if,IAMERICA
P.O. Box 1557 v
Harisburg, PA 1710$1557
Phone 717-234-8065
Fax 717 -234-0941
G 1992lrclnrror Co.npr^y ol An€nc.. P O gor 1557. Hrr',sblrg. PA 17105 All R€nts Reserved
PERANON FEATURES
Most oJ the LlFf-ette's mechanics
are different from other unils cunendy
available. The lifting mechanism, a
double row ball screw, is secured at
the bottom via a flexible mount bear-
ing, and al the top by a self€entering
high quality bearing, which also sup-
porls lhe driven pulley. The molor,
brake, solenoid and controller are all
localed at the top of th€ tower to make
servicing the unil easier. Access is
gained through a removable access
panel located toward the lop of lhe
bwerlrontpanel.
The guiding system is one of the
more importanl innovations. Support
for the tower and guiding is accom-
plished ihrough lour, round vertical
members, two per side. There are no
rolling members. The typtcal guide
wheels have been replaced wittt four
slide blocks per sirJe.
The side plates hous€ lhe dual bro-
ken screw satety. This salely is
unique to litls of this type. lf there
should be a failure of the screw, nut,
or other parl of the lifting mecfianism
which would cause a decrease in ten-
sion on a sensing plate, lhe satety
dogs will engage the vertical suppotls,
hold the platlorm, and disconnect
power lo the motor.
All LIFT-ettes fealure removable
lower base legs. With the legs in
place, lhe lower is approximalely 40"
wide. When removed. the lower is
only 24" wide, which allows the unit to
pass through a normal doorway. In
addition to strut supports, eight-, ten-,
and twelve-foot units have brackets
tor attaching the lower to a slructure.
INCLINATOR
ffiffirfnmence
Harrisburo. PA 17105.1557
Phone 717-234.806S
Fa\ 7 17 -234-0941
SPECIFICATIONS:
STANDARD EOUIPMENT
DESIGN: ls designed to me6l or exceed
th€ requirements ol ANSI 417.1
CAPACITY: 750 lbs.
SPEED: 10 FPM
TRAVEL DISTANCE: Up lo 12 tt.; up to 4
stops
MOTOR: 3t4HP,1725 RPM. 120 VAC. 60
HZ, 10 AMPS, single phase, lime delay
reversing. Conveniently localed at tho iop
of the iower. 20 AMP designaled service.
DFIVE: Recirculaling ball scr€w selt-
cenlering driven pulley, three V-8elts with
broken bell safety switch. Manual raise and
lowering.
BRAKE: Spring applied, electrically
rel€esed brake is mounted directly to the top
of lhe drive screw and prevents coasting
upon application.
OVERSPEED SAFETY: The speed
sensor/governor, it activated, keeps lhs unit
within th€ designed operating sp€ed.
Resels automatically.
DUAL SAFETY DOGS: Secures the plat-
form lo lhe guiding rails if th€r€ should be a
tailure ot the litling means.
LIMIT SWITCHES: UD and down limit
switches wilh a tinal limil lo disconnecl main
power in th€ event ol an overrun.
CONTROLS: Up/Down paddle switch on
platlorm and at landings. Keyswitch, alarm,
and emergency stop switch on units lor pub-
f ic inslaf lalions. 24 VAC.
TOWEF: 16 ga. auto steel wilh wealher
resistanl cbating. Femovable base legs
make handling and inslallation easier.
Upper service panel removable for quick
access to motor, conlroller and brake.
Spliced lower skirl on 10 tt. and 12 fl. models.
PLATFORM: 12 sq. tl. (15 sq. tl. optional).
42' high sides. Handrail on each long sid€.
Platlorm floor and ramp have non-skid sur-
faces.
PLATFORM SAFETY DIAPHBAGM:
Suspended lrom bottom of plattorm.
Stoos downward motion of lhe unit it an
obstruction is encountered.
SHIPPING: Unil is shipped parlially
assembled and pre-wired.
TESTING: All unils are insoecled and run
wilh capacity load beJore leaving the tactory,
WARRANTY: Has a limiled warranty.
Please conlact Inclinalor Co. lor complete
intormation.
OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT
ALTERNATE POWER: 12 voll DC
PLATFORM GATE: 42'high wilh interlock
LANDING GATE: 42" high with interlock
AUTO FOLD RAMP: On platform which
locks in the up posilion to acl as a guard.
STATIONARY RAMP: To be Used at the
lowef landing it no pit is provided.
NINETY DEGFEE EXITS: Platlorm can
have entry from one, two, or lhree sides.
CUSTOM SIZES: Plattorm size can be
cuslom ordered for special applications
(max. "D" dimension is 36"; max."W" dimen-
sion is 60").
SPECIFICATIONS OF EOUIPMENT SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUI NOIICE.
Mlnatot s LtFT-elt€ is reattily inialted in he tone, with the elrElcity to titt a wheelchab
aN pass€ngu uPtot relve t@L
/*fr-- +*/ 4
,rfu
te-V M^/',
0
o
/*,J-( /4r/' ,& +Zr"X,
,d-e /-ry@ Z;u" *: /Y4 "4-,
^,b1
'-/ pn '"2- tu4x4 -/*-* h ",e4- ,a Vq;
&; A -4e' " *6,-^ .A ,-.- l--".*-L-* I/:6 e ot"-b-*^ rt a--- /--r-.c*.tp-,-* .l
' y't^ D/^#1 .s{.o A d 4a, * h,/
54
r{1
/.A;- dY\ /-# ,rr'-Arrr**^. ,/'M laff '4L4'
-rk *? /,^'tln-4" sx. -""1 , .bq .6
tJ,.a*, c"-L^ "d:h 6-/{*+4zx ZrdfrA
u - e* bo/to >r"zf ,42":i 7-oo hA -*,- ilft Rry s8 s'.
TOWN OFVAIL
7J Sottb Frontagc Road
Vail, Colorado 81617
t03 -47 9 -2 I t 8 / FAX t0t -47 9 -2 I 66
,RfC,t
Works/Tratsgortati,
February 9, 1994
l,!r. Ric FieldsFieldscape
P.O. Box 1821Avon, CO 81620
RE: Covered Bridge Building / pocket park plan comnents.
Dear Ric:
rhank you for taklng the tine to discuss ny pranning conmentsearlier to{ar1.- r ap-orogize ijain for the aeiav in getting backwith you. Forrowing-is Jbrief-s1mop=ir "i:ttl-ii.r" we discussed.Please call ne as soon as possibl-e i?-inv or-trr"-r!-"otes are not toyour recollection.
1' Moving of the, ex.rstilg spruce in the niddre of the park srtewill not be arlowed. rfr"r6-i.- no reason to move it since theconstruction staging prans are being "ni"g6a.-- tilis tree should beincluded in the lree -prot"cifon lfun
2. Show the 10, T 30, trailer parking space on the plans along withthe tree protection fencing. 'trr" e"""i'";-;"d H;1'railer will haveto connect in severar prices. _rencirig--"rr""ra
-rc placed in arectilinear fashion at riast one toot beyond the drip line of eachtree within the construction area.
3' The wall of the ptanter along eridge street should be raised toelevation 60.5 0n a-tl sides. rirt" h,i-tr n;-ke lnii'pranter related_i".th".Eridge street tevel ratrrlitnan trr"-rtroJ-ie-ver. The Town ofvail vill naintai-n this_ plant"i ir an annual fiower bed. rt shouldbe connected to the park?s i*rlaiion ;Fi;;.-;lliernrn.tion fronthe Buirding Departnent wilt- have to be nade regarding thepossibility of a railing at this location.
4' All pavers shourd b9 as- specified in tbe streetscape l{aster prandocunent. These are standTa pi""t" in trrl ;t;ii;i.nd,, coror rnix.soldier course Davers- are_Aralahoe Blend coror onry. A sampre of:lg actual. pavlrs should bd =rruritt.a prior to instarlation.Pavers at street revel shourd ue irre eonn dntckness, ottrers can be60nn if desired.
5' All retaining warls shourd be of the same c.r.p. concrete with
stone veneer and cap construction.systen behind the walls.Be sure to show the draLnage
6. Subnit the railing design for approval prior to construction.Only the niddle sections of ttre railing need to be detachable.Allow for a nininum opening width of 2Or. Allow for the railing toreturn to the Covered Bridge to close off the drop off that existsat that location.
7. Revise the seatinlt area, planter and steps to not inpact thefloodplain as dLscussed.
8. Move the TOV street light frorn the planter to the southeastcorner of the seatl.ng area. Add a trash receptacle to the seatlngarea also. Trash receptacle design should be consistent with the
Streetscape design. Subnit a catalog or cut sheet on the productfor approval prLor to purchase.
9. f have one comnent which f failed to mention on the phoneearlier. If Bridge Street is cut to perform water lineinstallation or to nake a water tap, f would like to extend theParks irrigation systen to existing planter along Russellrs walland along the creek below Russellrs. Please nake allowance forthis when deslgning the irrigation systen.
Please call ne if you have any questions regarding any of theseconnents. My nunber is 479-2161.
SLncerely,
1al{Clpz*hrir,v^ .
Todd Oppehheimer
Town of VaiI
Landscape Architect
cc:
Ha11
JAH-31-94 l.toH :3A t1?o
,,.4BTIST6 IN COMMEBCIAL -
FE$IDENTIAL I-ANDSCAPING & MAI NTENANCE
JAITTUARY 3I,1994
TO: CRAIOFRT,NIZ
FROM: JODYDANIELS
RE: BRIDOE STREETOFFICEBTJII,DING
It i! in Ey opinion that 0rc 25.30' qnrco cao be movcd with e 50/50 drmcc of surrriviltg
provided tho following proccdures ro followsd:
l) Ball eizc diamctrr nccds to be 8-10" ger cetiber Indr of ts€e trunkZ) Ball depth nceds to bo as dscp or lsss ifmot sfiuotsrr ir not cignifioant, duo to hard pan
qr cltseso rcelsy coflditisns.3) Ball needs to bo sccurcd ciihc,r by wira useh or woodcn bo:r, so that ao soils arc
distrbed &uing lihing urd uarplutirg opcratisrc.4) Lifting of feo rugt bo ftom lhc Iower put of the ball, go tlu no sipificant damago to
balt oasurE uihflc ransptanthg5) To miaioizo transplant shock; stan ft!ryIandng ia early rpring( ttc carlicr thc bottr)
apply wilt pmof to foliago as soon Ns wcalhcr wErE! to above fteezing t€npcBtuscs ild
watee thoroughly wlco a weok, also guy trso soanoly with hoce and tr'ire tie downr ct
fourpoints.
Sabelle has been transplanting large epecimen hccs in this arca sincg 1992 witt a 90% snaccst
rab. Thcre will bc an abovc avtrago lost of nc0auoi lhc fil8| sd secfid year of tansplmting
but gcnerrlly on a rco with hcarry foliagc fir io not a ugticablo problcao.
If 1ou havo ury firth* guc*ions in rogflr& to ttris Eatt€r, plcaso fool fi€e to sontac;t Ee at
32&64er.
SinocrolS
SoBolls Landecaping & Maintenaoe Co.
FOS' 7A&0209 2901 SOUTH SANTA FE OFIVE ENGLEWOOO. CoLORADO 60110 FAX (303t 78&0507
(7'lgl 606.1840 €180 LEHMAN DRVE COtOiADO SPFING8,COLOFAOO e0907 FAX rnq 59A.3460
P-A2
I4NDSCAPff 9
MAINTEIIANCE
Joily Danlels, Rcgional Managc
Ctrmtcl Err$;
CHUCK ROSENQUIST BETH & ROD SLIFER RON RILEY
GORE CREEK PLAZA SLIFER, SMITH & FRAMPTON RUSSELL'S RESTAURANT
3777 MT. VEDER 230 BRIDGE STREET 228 BRIDGE STREET
NAPA, CA 94558 VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
DAVE GORSUCH PEPIGRAMSHAMMER
GORSUCH, LTD. PEPISPORTS
263 E. GORE CREEK DR. 231 BRIDGE STREET
vAtL, co 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
a) r r 1e + - "cJ tsrrt Cft tr
,'I
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUB PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on February 28, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration of:
1. A request for a major CGI exterior alteration for the Laughing Monkey to allow an
addition to the south side of the Creekside Building located at 223 East Gore Creek
Drive/a part of Tract A, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant Jose GuzmanPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
1 2. A request for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow lor the redevelopment of the
& Govered Bridge Building located a1227 Bridge StreeULots C and D and a part of Lot
D\ B, Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st Filing.7
Applicant Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Planner: Mike Mollica
3. A request for a variance for required parking to be locatd off-site for a single family
residence located at2642 Cortina Lane/Lot 6, Block B, Vail Ridge.
Applicant: Hans WemannPlanner: Randy Stouder
4. A request for a wall height variance and driveway slope variance to allow for a
driveway to exceed 8% located a12445 Garmisch Drive/Lots 10 and 11, Block H, Vail
das Schone 2nd Filing.
Applicant Steve Sheridan and Adam SzpiechPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
5. A request for a variance to allow for a 6 foot fence located in the lront setback and a
variance to allow alternative materials not listed in the Design Review Board Guidelines
for a fence located at 51 18 Gore Circle/Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn Sth Addilion.
Applicant: Robert SchonkwilerPlanner: Randy Stouder
6. A request for a side and rear setback variance to allow for an expansion to the existing
residence located a12757 Davos TrailAot 1, Block F, Vail Das Schone 1st Filing.
Applicant: Juergen Krogmann and Monica Roth
Planner: Randy Stouder
I
7.A request for a minor subdivision and to
Residential to Low Densi$ Multi-Family,
specifically described as follows:
rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
A D|'cet ot hrd h th! Southro.n Ou|n!. d Soctim 14, TownshF 5 Sout[ turyr 8l U,brl oa tho 6|h Pdn*d M.tldtn, ]no,e prtdcubtly d.|ctt.rt !
togous:
Beglnnhg d s polnt wh.rE 8 trs$ c.p 3rt lor r ltn..3 corn r lo( lh. l{lrt Ou|l|cr ol t|ld S.Clon la' b.s3 (Nodh 29 degrrca 28 mln|nr3 5l t omda
rvrtr, tgrr.oe ioqt oecot (No|fl *t Dogt€- t5 r||d!3 @ tlcqldr w..l 915.€,8 l€d lbu{r!q: ndE Nodr t4 dogtler os nhut6 tg !ecm& E|!l'
10.?S tsqri Th.no. 183.82 het rlong iha rc of I qJrva lo thr dglf whlci art auulnd! r chont badng Notlh 88 dlg|!.. 12 nhuft $ !€condr E|!|,
l8t,78 tett; Th.ic. SoUi 7, drg|lrr 4t) mlndr 2l !.aoodt €|d, 8aZ t t; th.i.a l,a7.,ag |||t dq{ li! .rc ot r cuw! to th3 bil whldl.tr tttren& a
.fiord borrhg Nodh 6 tbgr.n 38 ml ,ter 17 sccood! E.|t, r4Aqt |.|l; Ttlltr. Norlh m d!!f.n 5C raulor 55 tocood! Ed, 06.55 hati Th ce 51.10
tolt rbr0 th. r|c of I cuw! to thc delt rvfth |lr rubtlrdt r dod baulne Soudt ,1, drgr!6 20 mlnu.| 37 lcondt Est, .44.2014!t Thrnc. South t,a
d.g,.er 25 mlnut|| g) !.conl't Wff, 1t051 lrcl;
Thfice South 88 d!9|tar 18 dflt.. 91 !!cond! Wrtl. 320'm ld:
Thri€ No h rO dcgr..t (I, nlnd. (,5 !.ootb W*l glfi) Itdi
Thrnco South 7? degrla! 48 dnugt 4l rrcofitt Wbrl, 10.18 txl;
lhtnc. Sodh lO d.gn . 53 dnu!| 93 !!s|dr Wh, 38,48 ha:
Th.nc. Nonh 87 dcgrra 40 Dlnutla 08 raca.dr Wbtl 337.72 tatl;
Th.ncr (Nonh tl degnq 52 mhd.r t3 |.cqrb Er! lg',q, b.l D!.dl tlotlh'li d.grtr 55 tnftrrb 3l $cq|dt E4 12'.75 L.l Mflur.d) lolh.
POINT OF SEGINNI'{G.
B.rhg ttofi c.LO. rc(o.d lor South h.I ol Srdlon In. bdwrc|| S|(iloor 'l+16. (G.LO rftord Sosur tX doe|ior E),2 mhul|| EaS (Sqrn 0f d.gt€!| 38
mhtn.r 32 Fcorar E|.t Uor!,!d,
8.
L
A request for a variance from Section 18.69.040 (Development Restricted) of the Vail
Municipal Code to allow lor the construction of buildings on slopes greater than 40%
located at 4335 Bighorn Road/Block 3, Bighorn 3rd Fillng.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Juanita l. Pedotto
Andy Knudtsen
Michael Lauterbach/BAB Partnership
Jim Cumutte
Walter Kirsch
Randy Stouder
A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamsids Circle WesVlots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM
7 February 1993
Town of Vail, Office of Comrnunity Development
Date:
Place:
Present:
Re:
Mike Mollica y'
Greg Hall
Charlie Overend
Todd Oppenheimer
Govered Bridge Building
Sidney Schultz
Peter Dann
Ross Bowker
Ric Fields
Craig Bruntz
Staging:
Greg feels the width remaining on Bridge Street with the construction fence in place is
too narrow. He wants a minimum 12 feet of clear width during the peak summer
season (June - September).
The construction trailer is not acceptable along the bank of Gore Creek as shown.
Craig will look at relocating the tower crane east toward Bridge Street and positioning
the trailer west under the trees. Care will be taken to protect the roots of the trees
from concentrated weights and other construction damage.
The Staff felt that the Town Council would not allow Ford Park to be used for staging.
Peter will look at the possibility of using the Christiania/VA lot or the VA Golden Peak
lot for staging,
Any modification to the flood plain will require FEMA/Corps of Engineers approval.
Todd will check into the requirements for a 404 Permit and stream stabilization.
There was a concern about on-site storage of materials after the beginning of ski
season. Greg pointed out that the area below Bridge Street would not be available
since that is a snow storage area. The Pocket Park construction may not be completed
until Spring '95.
Conference Memorandum - Covered Bridge Building
7 February 1993
Page 2
Covered Bridge:
The schedule for reconstruction of the bridge is not definite. East West expressed that
the tower crane could be used to help with portions of the bridge construction if that
work was coordinated with the Covered Bridge Building construction schedule.
Water Supply:
The question of adequate water supply/pressure to the building needs to be resolved'
Contact will be made with Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation and the Vail Fire
Department.
Design lssues:
Mike explained Jeff Winston's concerns about how the diagonal line through the site
(used by Staff to calculate building height and percentagesl had controlled the massing
and design of the building. Sid explained that Staff had previously said that they would
not support a deviation from these requirements, so the building was designed so as to
not require any variances. lt was also questioned whether the flat roof of level five
would be perceived from pedestrian vantage points,
Landscape lssues:
Greg suggested a railing design at the bench area that permitted the railing to be first
removed from the posts, and then the posts from the stone cap.
Mike showed a re-design of the Pocket Park by Winston showing a stair to the Retail
Level and another stair to the Park. Todd and Ric will work together on a revised plan
incorporating elements of both designs, relocating elements to stay out of the flood
plain.
Landscaping in the planters was discussed. Mike strongly urged the use of at least one
or two aspens along Bridge Street. These should be located so as not to interfere with
the roof above. Ric will have a revised plan ready for the meeting on the 14th of
February.
The foregoing constitutes my understanding of matters discussed and decisions
reached. lf the interpretation of others varies, please inform us in writing'
4/by'/t
SS
aa
,:.
2. t,?4- -'l C*r*1 fuJa,- f^ra 6",
o
""t-"r*\
il ++--^ elf +hJ
il
il
it cU1 . ( 2<_ 4- O-/&-tet-at^-.-f -W,
i
t.
I r r'- t I | , I I
;ia) tz-{t L/</ r"-."1 a2zL6* f-r.,.,--
li />1r\ c-<r\r-1 a{ ftr.S y5 ,.,,,n-k ,*/ f/*--,i -I /,'' 'ii Czv>.---.*.-tR
:!rili \nil:l f / t' ,.-, / ll /\6 ) (-4Vfc,t -tz /< D7 /CD4 d y<l' / (l ,
'i --t^r- e *,^*aly<--/',,n , Q ** yl-."a {>it a /
:i
i:
1/7y'"n'ap )r:n
.^1ry 2 oA (V
I
1.21.?i
75 South Frontage Road
Vtil, Colortdo 81657
t 03 -47 9 -2 1 t 8 / FAX t 0 t -47 9 -2 1 66
Department
.fu z T+L.
uEuoRAltDulr
To: Mike Mollica
Froms Todd Oppenheimer
Date: ilanuary 24, L994
Re: Covered Bridge Building subrnittal
I have reviewed the tatest subnittal for the Covered Bridge
Building, which included a Landscape Plan, shadow Analysis plan'
Site pfiir and Topographic Survey. Following are my cornments and
concerns regarding the project. Please call ne if you have any
questions. -I did speak witn Sianey Schuttz early last vre_ek and
igreea that a neeting with you, Greq Hal], Sidney and myself would
be a good idea.
1. See revised plan for Pocket Park seating area/stairway. Removal
of the existin-g Spruce next the Covered Bridge is unacceptable.
The seating arel his been shifted south and west. One set of steps
is eliminaled and the planting areas are combined. The two foot
shift irest provides laaitional space for street maintenance
activities. ihe additional planter at street level adds landscaped
area and eliminates the trdeadil corner vlhere the street light is
located.
2. A plan for construction staging still needs to be agreed upon.
I am Loncerned about using the pocket park for staging because of
the grade difference between the park and Bridge Street and because
of the number of mature trees on the site. Grading in a ramp,
stockpiling soil and other naterial and damage from construction
equiprnent witt seriously conprornise the health of the trees.
3. I am assuming that the developerrs Landscape Architect is going
to provide conltruction details and other plans needed for the
conitruction of the Pocket Park inprovements. The details and
plans are referenced further in these comments.
4. The referenced irrigation system should be extended over the
entire park area. This should be an autonatic system with a water
tap, meter and backflow prevention device.
5. The entire park should be resodded with a rninimum of six inches
of soil preparation.
6. Repair eroded sections of streambank with Permamat Fabric and
TOWN OFVAIL
of Puhlic lllorks lTran tportat io n
I{
boulder placenent. f will provide details and specifications to
the owner's Landscape Architect upon request.
7. The area for asphalt patchback on Bridge Street should be shown
on the plans. Check with Greg HalI for the nininum width of patch
required.
8. Modify planters per attached cross section sketch and plan notesto reduce slope of planted areas.
9. Provide a cross section drawing through planter lthere indicated
on the plan.
10. Provide construction details as indicated on the plan. I canprovide the Owner's Landscape Architect with information upon
request.
11. l.faintenance of the tvo planting beds irnmediately between nridge
Street and the building will be the responsibility of the property
owner. Please note that on the plan. The Tov will uraintain thepark area and planters at the stairway. A separate irrigation
systen will be reguired.
1'2. Subruit irrigation plan and detaits. Use the following
equipnent.
Rainbird heads w/ flex pipe connectors.frritrol l'lc-Plus controller
CL 200 pvc nainline
NSF rated poly laterals, 1rr min. diameter
14 GA UF wire
13. Subrnit information on how icing problems on walking surfaceswill be handled/nitigated. All areas where icing could occur are
very shady but the handicap lift is of particular concern.
I
l
i
;
I
!
-1 |.'1'.. -
:t:
lt-tiIi,
rl.it-tl^l
:
I
I
COLORADO. GEORGIA. NORIH CAROLINA o VIRGINIA o
January 17, 1994
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Attn: Planning Staff
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are writing concerning our proposed redevelopment of the Covered Bridge
Building and the establishment of a "pocket park" on the Town of Vail's land adjacent to
this building. This letter will serve as the commitment of Covered Bridge Building, LLC
(CBB, LLC) (an entity being formed by Harry H. Frampton, lll to acquire this property
from Hillis of Snowmass) to construct these improvements substantially in accordance
with the Landscape Plan by Fieldscape daled 1/12/94 (copy enclosed).
Assuming all approvals are granted and the project moves forward CBB, LLC will
make these improvements at its own cost and expense conditioned upon the following:
1) A maximum price not to exceed $92,000. (The current plan is far more
expensive than the original, and exceeds our budget by $a5,000.)
2) An appropriate use or license agreement with TOV for CBB, LLC for the use
ol the land North of the Covered Bridge Building and the atfected portion
of Bridge Street for the duration ol the of the construction of both the
building and the park and requisite access thereto from Bridge Street.
3) Acceptance and operation/maintenance of the park upon completion by
TOV.
For:
Covered Bridge Building, LLC and
Harry H. Frampton, lll
r') (-' i,r,,- ,, l', \r. -lrL ) ) r' \.._,',- (. , t i ,..
Ross E. Bowker
Mce President
REB/klm
BeaverCreekoRcsort. l00EastThomasPlace .Drawer2770. Avon,Colorado 81620. (303) 845-9200. FAX (303) 845-7205
WASHINGTON
INTER.OEPARTMENTAL REVIEW OF THE COVERED BRIDGE BUILDING
All previous comments regarding on-site, roof and adjacent to site drainage'
utilities, snow shedding, deliveries, trash, etc. apply.
Provide detailed engineered plans for improvements abutting Bridge Street.
These plans will belased on surveyed information of adjacent area required.
Two trees next to building will not be able to be saved - too close to building'
too close to each other, too big to survive.
Pocket Park plan needs to meet winston Associates plan as revised by Town
of Vail staff.
Need construction access/staging plan.
Coordinate improvements with reconstruction of Covered Bridge'
while Govered Bridge is under construction, a detour will be going through the
pocket park and use tne existing stairs. lf they will not exist, need alternate
solution.
Provide sprinkler system, resodding and stream bank erosion stabilization' In
reconstruction of pbcfet park, Town of Vail will evaluate pocket park plan.
currenfly, it does not function well for snow removal. Tree next to covered
Bridge wiil be lost. Remove paver stones on west side. Evaluate street light
requirements.
Provide detailed building plans once complete'
Columns on wesl lower level block access to building.
Look at pulling deck back on master bedroom level to step building lace back.
Fire Department Comments. Januarv 12. 1994 (Mike Mcceel:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
L
10.
11.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Question exit(s) from third floor.
Building will require 100"/o fire sprinkler and fire detection system'
Four inch water line (on Bridge Street) is subject to replacement, pgnding
UEVW & S hydraulic'analysii, ClP, and review and approval by UEVW & S'
Staging during construction should be specified.
l-tz'7.1 f ,4-l b 9J 9/*/r-
5. All comments from 6/90 (except #4) apply'
6. plan assumes 4 inch water line, sewer and utilities will run beneath the building
from Bridge Street.
7. Third floor use (i.e. office) may have to be deed restricted due to lack of exits.
Design as proposed will not support other more dense use due to occupant
toaO. t.C.fi.O. review and/or conference with Building Official is recommended.
8. Class 1 standpipe is required in the NW stair'
9. Fire Department connections for standpipe and fire sprinkler system use
required to be installed on Bridge Street side of buiHing'
10. Trash storage and removal looks inadequate for that much retail. Difficult
access to trash room for trash, fire'
Fire Department Comments. June 20. 1990 (Mike Mccee):
1. New and existing structure required to have fire sprinkler system throughout.
2. Fire detection system must be expanded.
3. lnsure adequate water supply for fire sprinkler system'
4. No display will be allowed beneath exterior stair on Bridge street.
5. Provide exterior floor drains at basement level lower gallery'
6. Phase I recall on elevator (minimum) required.
7. class I standpipe with valves at each landing required in NW stair.
c:Vnike! etbrs\bridge.1 1 2
JOH N \/\/, OUNN
ARTHUR A. AEPLANALP, JR.
ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN
OIAN E L. HERMAN
ROHN K, ROBBINS
TELEPHON E:
(303) 476-0300
TELEcoPIERT
(3O3) 476-4765
LAw OFFICES
DUNN, ABPLANALP & CHRISTENSEN, P,C.
VAIL NATIONAL BAN K tsUILDING
5u rrE 300
I08 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST
vArL, COLORADO a I 657
14 January 1994
SPECIAL COUNSEL:
JERRY l^'. HANNAH
Mr. Mike Mofllca
Tovrn of VaiI
Department of Conmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road west
Vail CO
HAND DELIVERED
Re: Development Proposal for Lot "c" and Lot "d",and the southerly 4 feet of Lot "b", all in
Block 5-8, Vail Vlllage First Fiting
Dear Mlke:
In accordance wlth the request of Ned Gwathmey, you wiII find
under cover of thls transmlttal the tltle report relating to the
above property and the adjacent property comprising what has become
known as the parkJ.ng area for Gasthoff Gramshanmer (part of Lot
"a", Block 5-8, ValI village Flrst FIIing).
In order to make this report more intelligible as it relates
to the above property, I have deleted those references to the
parking area, as I understand that does not concern you. I have
teft that informatlon readable, ln order that you may be assured
that I have deleted nothlng whlch actually refers to the above
property.
Please contact me lf you ha questlo
Arthur A.analp, Jr
Enclosurexc: Mr. Ned Gwathney
ery truly
A L T oO" o M M r r M E N r
SCHEDULE A
our Order No. V22819
For fnfornation OnIY
s1s5. 00
s1s5. oo
PLEASE REFER TO OUR ORDER NO.v228L9. ****
- Charges -
ALTA owner PoIicY
Info Binder
--TOTAI-,--
****WITH YOUR REMITTANCE
1. Effective
2. Policy to
ilALTAI Ownerrs
Date:November 3o,
be issued, and proPosed
Policy Lo-L7-92
1993 at 8:0O A.M.
Insured:
Proposed Insured:
3.
5.
..+:7 HILLIS OF SNOM'{ASS, INC. A COLORADO CORPORATION AS TO PARCEL
2
The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this Commitnent and covered herein is:
A Fee Sirnple
Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
EIIARLES: II: RESENQUIST AT{E FETER 3: SIITTZER; A''ARTNERSIIfF AI{D'
€ftsTHer €ruwsHruq{bR, IN€t, ft €eLeru\De eeRPeru\EJel{-r i\E Te PJ\ReEL
-j-HILLIS OF SNOWI{ASS, rNC. A COLORADO CORPORATTON AS TO PARCEL
2
The land referred to in this Cornmitment is described as
follows:
?*R€BL 1:
* FAf{f €F LeT "a" BLOCI( 5 Ei VAIL VILL*€Ei FIRST'ILI}|€; €OU\TY
fbffrefi*
PAGE
ALrP"oMMrrMENr
SCHEDULE
Our Order No. V22819
65 DEGREES ]-8 MINUTES OO SECONDS EAST AND ALONG THE NORTH
OF SAID LOT IIAII A DISTANCE OF 390.19 FEET TO THE POINT
BEGINNTNG' THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREES 18 MINUTES OO S DS EAST
AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT I]A1I 108.; THENCE
SOUTH 77 DEGREES 11 MINUTES OO SECONDS EA DTSTANCE OF
73.03; THENCE SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MI OO SECONDS WEST A
DISTANCE oF 75 FEET; THENCE No DEGREES 19 MINUTES OO
SECONDS T{EST A DISTANCE OF 2 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26 DEGREES
41 MINUTES OO SECONDS DISTANCE OF 74.36 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH OO DEGREES 09 ES OO SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 9.98
FEET; THENCE SO 9 DEGREES 17 MINUTES OO SECONDS WEST A
DTSTANCE OF -11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 43 MINUTES OO
SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES
L7 ES OO SECONDS WEST A DTSTANCE OF 45.06 FEET TO THE
PARCEL 2:
LOT C AND LOT D, AND THE
BLOCK 5-8, VArL VILLAGE
PLAT THEREOF, COUNTY OF
SoUTHWESTERLY 4 FEET OF LOT B, ALL rN
FIRST FILING, ACCORDTNG TO THE RECORDED
EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
t't'i \) D
ALrP"oMMrrMENr
SCHEDULE B-1
(Requirernents) Our Order No' V22819
The following are the requirements to be cornplied with:
1. Pa]tnent to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of
the fuII "ottiid"t"tion for the estate or interest to be
insured.
2. ProPer instrunent(s) creating the estate-or interest to be
insured must be eiecuted and duly fited for record, to-wit:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLy, AND NO POLICY WILIJ BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
THE COUNTy CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE REQUIRES RETI'RN
ADDRESSES ON DOCI'MENTS SENT FOR RECORDING! !
PAGE 3
ALTOO"OMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B-2
( Exceptions )Our Order No. V22819
The poticy or policies to be issued wiII contain exceptions to the
follbwing-unleis the sarne are disposed of to the satisfaction of
the Conpany:
t-. standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet.
6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special
assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office.
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land'
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any'
g. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JUIY 13, ]-899' IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
uNrrED srATEs AS REsERVED rN uNrrED srATEs PATENT REcoRDED Jury 13 ' L899 'IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
].]-. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHTCH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE' COLOR, RELIGION, OR
NATIONAL ORIGTN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRI'MENT RECORDED AUgUSt 10, L962 1 IN
BOOK 1.74 AT PAGE 179.
L2. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES.
13. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRTCTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING.
(ITEMS 9 THROUGH 13 AFFECT BOTH PARCELS)
].5. UTILTTY EASEMENT
NORTHEASTERLY LOT
OF VATL VILLAGE,
TEN FEET IN WIDTH ALONG
LINES OF S ERTY AS SHOWN
AND
RECORDED PLAT
TERLY
ON THE
PAGE
ALTOO"OMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B-2.
(Exceptions) Our Order No. V22819
Reguired bY Senate Bilt 91-14
A) The subject real property nay be located in a special taxing
district.
B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction
may be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The infornation regarding special districts and the boundaries
of such districts may be obtained from the Board of county
commissioners, the county clerk and Recorder, or the county
Assessor.
Reguired bY senate Bill 92-143
A) A Certificate of Taxes Due Listing each taxing jurisdiction
shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
@
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ALT^O"oMMrrMENT
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions)
A DEED OF TRUST DATED August 10, 1984 FROM HILLIS OF SNOWI'IASS, rNC' TO THE
PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUIITY F'OR THE USE OF JOHN A. DOBSON AND CATHERINE
M. DOBSON TO SECURE THE SI'I!'I OF $1,908,593.77, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE
UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED August 13, L984, IN BOOK 392 AT PACE 295'
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTTON WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
August O4, L987 , IN BOOK 467 AT PAGE 221 AND RECORDED AUGUST L7 , 1987 fN
BOOK 458 AT PAGE 63.
SATD DEED OF TRUST I'IAS ASSIGNED TO UNTTED BANK OF DENVER NATTONAL
ASSOCIATTON, CO-TRUSTEE IN ASSIGNMENT RECORDED August 15, 1988, IN BOOK 489
AT PAGE 112, AS TO AN UNDTVTDED L/2 TNTEREST.
A DEED OF TRUST DATED August 03, 1987 FROM HILLIS OF SNOWMASS, rNC., A
COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
VAIL NATIONAL BANK TO SECURE THE STIM OF $255,OOO.OO, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS
PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOP, RECORDED August 04, L987t IN BOOK 467 AT
PAGE 220.
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
August 04, Lg87,IN BOOK 467 AT PAGE 221 AND RECORDED AUGUST L7' 1987 IN
BOOK 468 AT PAGE 63.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSTGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
August 17, L987, IN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 52.
EXTENSION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SATD DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
August 31, L992, fN BOoK .588 AT PAGE 35.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
August 31, 1992, IN BOOK 588 AT PAGE 36.
(TTEMS 15 AND 16 AFFECT PARCEL 2)
our order No. v22819
16.
1,7 .
18.
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
SECURED PARTY, RECORDED
EMP f RE SAVf NGS BUI LD I NG-,Prl$D-I€+rrffiSSOC I ATI ON, THE
Auqust 2l--++9ff,--IN-BOOK 536 AT PAGE 455.
19. D
€eptember l9r, 1988 flr Beeli 191 ftR Fl\eE 453r
PAGE
I
Return to /46 //;ca
Town Planner
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVI EW
HEARING t t. /4t /1r/f
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
>-.-/rtrfu/
^2/ ldt 6.
ov4tJ&' Date:-
on h; lc,,lsifl,Xl, r, *,
1\d,"wyo, n/. /, hrs, rJc'
el.. offlf
z) Prur,'Je dz/a,'hJ €1f.r'.erraA //^, fi, c',+.fto ttO"'-t:15
o.brIL"X .?',.J7, flno+.-/k* po/o^, *r// 'l* b.*J u,' surcdLt'/ J^fo ot-"4M! 'fEWi-L
u,/J;p "-ri '7--r* '/'L lJt"' 5*'+t
-TZo c(o*- J- b-'/l"r';'- 't{' l- co'a oJkt"Tu ^'/
L $u/sr"{
u! *^P"&{*,?th *?/; , ryJs /. lrrtf uin5/aa A>so",-L, p/^
') ^t;i
*;;i*:],J:'
^:r{,, /,1o,,^ ?z^a) *gd;A"h t"^pro,,c*ii ut,rl 0 nl."onsJ,ua/,,-1 ol cour.. J
^",P{!ftr:- Date:-
Comments:l) wh;L Cauct'eJ ts,,.r^e fg an &, ,*slrn.J.'n J A
oLlour t ,",,;// be Ao,fr -//-" 7 t^ Jf, f)or/--/ ,oarlc-
anl us<- JL. e r;tJ;A "rJ^.',\ . "rJ Jk/ *'nJ ""'1, *,J
.ol/cr,*L
s) P*u,'J- S7r,xb /- ,/ r/.*., r46oJ/:r. a- ) sloo-.- p...r,-
e fl oa; r^
S J n L,./: .o/ :.u, . -z 4 re.an<rJ 7_.T.. r ,':""'.::"* -: .*nttrueJ'on o{ foeblp*L-'",7n o+ lL / vv,,ll N"t€u.,lr ._L pact_/ p*k- p/on,. Cunrt^!
/
a& h 'b" {,r-rron ,^-e-L( {* sno,*, /e h,,ou- r . *Ttuz- |vvr* oovt.c! bn Jy. ;:;i Lo /o, l. pcn
,)T:.L'#.:,,;;,,# irto1,,'irj,' *r1; ;"'' -'; :;,,'*' - ^ J
\
Gomments: I *tt prcti ws 00,-,"',t n /s rcs uJ'fi
@
5 ho,-*: ' -,VJ ",.X7 *l; ar:es ,7ro ,V
h) co/u,nn5
a) /""L *(
+ thl
oh
"*
Qr//i^q/0
/o*.
du-l-
{,*
L-'tt
h*t
b*/"
o
ftor- 2,o,, I b- ugn_
tP . l,tulr bJr*-- b,*f
b'r.'lJ'T
I
Beturn to ho//i.,q
Town Planner
INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT: C
DATE SUBMITTED:
6./P-- %*
f4i\^- -
,*J -J*,J -,'l-L
\
CoMMENTS NEEDED BY: F./., 2, /7?4
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
-bt^-/ Kt44 - Jo,,-, /l?0 cr^-""*L ,.''L dft-&,///.
PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Comments:
Date:
P.evies,eduy:fr'n.n <:> oateb'27'1o r ^,,
Ccn'iients: Nfpli..*^-.f p>,laov<-\ y'v,*o-.tJ'7. 3
^
\-k4tht-'Jt1'
apr+.r- {": A-a"\-,'.-
' U^^r fL.-^ ;;r- *{-*!2-., {**-t of
-, Ct*.1pf* a.'J A 5'.-lJl., tr {..,,+t" |Lyr: f^_.-,_, ;Jl .., '1r.^, p^-.\*-0 ln, 1-t-- prw,p,>u. )! 'rS' J,rr.---1,*-t pn**1 , *i ft*' 'r-'. | ,t S*'L -ry.,t*
F"^.t^-L'i..,f':ai i'f suur vi r,-cV T^-- e-,.t ^-.
: ft"--(',,,-.'"li ".-t"J\. a tl\ln.Tf-^ ^-.\t- %.^ \-. a-V, p, "{F.-+\ . \ p ?L^1"J.^_.-_{4:'*t r: ,1p f|''f f:: TL ;"^^l- ;!\rr-l it, &"".l.t +tJ?itr*RlpuKltl tJ,r-I' ; €; .L.*'-ztcibiW ^it,r
Revi ewed by: -------------Date-
!
Conlants:
P?OJECT:
DATE SUsI,IITTED:
CCI."i{ENTS }IEEDED BY :
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC }IORKS
POLICE DEPARTI4ENT
Revier'red by:
Connerrts:
Date
i
li
n
tl
l|'tl
ll
I1
tl
I
RECi:!ATi OII DEPARTI.::NT
Reviewed.by:
C,qw.nts:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date
!
a o
Retum to Alo/ lica
Town Planner
DATE SUBMIfiED:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEAAING F"1. /1, /??.{
COMMENTS NEEDED 8Y: r'}. z nu
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
--).. I-Or-,--/ Kz/^..A/ - J",-, t?70 oc,"--u-t a.tz *hJ./
t).4
,'J/ ,,-') " z-- -1 /?
z)8 ,r/) ..,.!. L /.?-? ia71,2-z 2..:. - n., 4 *.r' --
,1/ir'i);,':*';;': to-.&a,.t* 12't'o'zer) z: s*'ert*t &
,"y/.'-ez,".z-,1,,/'uJ -'i 77;yzy' ? S'/('77t''- - " v -"tc7c's'
.; d/ tze..,.v.-'/ ff'- '" '42 t/':uz/'J
'/-,-
,4.-.^/:r'a:-z' ''7" 'et'"7 /ot-' '4/''/r )'
7) sor'./ri. "t';-' 1'r"r "ri"/'' ) 'z'":
z/'zt E 2t'< l- /'t'zs ' Z2^" "7-'
('-.,a'.'L|J'' r"L''^ /"'"'-( "'4'tJ
;/i"'?
- /'/ /
-{< . 8. c' tvt v r e-'"<'/ 7 -"/7A z<''1/zz "u "'"-
., ?''iiifi'i:"'" "'*o,-''::' ,;-,i,"'!</
;'r '(
' ?) ./;""- '4v"" ''t'"";7 Ca, dJ
;:l :--':,-:';'':: ; ';"
^t:::
,'/-[2' ) z'r/-J '/li- 4"- :
t-bd ',tr,,2 / o r'-'7
-. ,n./<r, .,.-,44?.o. /
"/^
,,IJt.' ,.nr. z^ ,4,2:4'L.
' 't ;
/)Al:r'/ [v't)'?'U'!z- ]ft;'7'l'/''iL I
e,./../ "';- -1 "--* o' '-/?-4) 1 E''{'n1 7/af 7tz'e; / /""' '
f-a-
P?,OJECT:
DATE sUsr4lTT ED z 1y'i!: t-O---
CCI'',i4ENTS i|EEDEO BY :_.----
ERIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
I NTEP.. OEPARTIIENTAL REVI EW
DATF.,,OF PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC }IORKS
P.ev'iersed by:
Connents:
Date
5 January 1994
Mr. Mike Mollica, Planner
Town of Vail Community Development
1 11 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Govered Bddge fuilding
Dear Mike:
Attached please find the remainder of the submittal materials for our PEC hearing on the
restoration of the Covered Bridge Building.
Since we are submitting well in advance of the 17 January deadline for the 14 February
PEC meeting, we would very much like to schedule a work session with the PEC as soon
as possible. Our client is on a very tight schedule, and the pending sale of the building and
subsequent redevelopment is contingent on them having a certain feeling of comfort from
the Staff and PEC prior to the closing date.
After reviewing the application materials, please give me a call so we can arrange a work
session date. lf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Thank you.
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY/PRATT/SCHULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
EMG/ad
Enclosures
copy to:Ross Bowker
Harry Frampton
Edward M. Gwathmey, Jr.,IA|A
ot.
Statf is recommending 90 day review periods for all of the following proiects:
A. A request for a major CCll exterior alteration and a height variance to allow for
the enclosure of thb elevator shaft for the Antlers Condominiums located at 680
West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing'
Applicant: AntlersCondominiumAssociation
Pfanner: RandY Stoudel
Randy stouder stated that the applicant would be working with the existing
elevator area so that it would be possible to access each floor without going up
a||ightofslairs.Aheightvariancewi||benecessarytoa|lowforthe
modification to the existing elevator shaft.
B. A request for a major ccl exterior alteration and a height variance to allow for
the redevelopment of the covered Bridge Building located a|227 Bridge
StreeVLots i and D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail Village lst Filing.
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, lnc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica stated that since this request was advertised, it has been
determined that a height variance will not be necessary. The applicant desires
to "fast track" this proiect in order to begin construction in the spring of 1994'
c. A request for a major ccl exterior alteration for the Laughing Monkey to allow
an addition to the south side of the Creekside Building locaied at 223 East
Gore Creek Drive/a part of Tract A, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Jose Guzman
Planner: ShellY Mello
Andy Knudtsen said that the applicant is proposing to modify the existing patio
of the Laughing MonkeY.
D. A request for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance to the
Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates
oflices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead lst Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen showed the PEC where the proposed expansion of the Vail
Associates offices would be located.
Planning and Environmontsl Commission Minrnes
Decemb€t 20, lggg
E. A request for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance to allow for
the expansion of dwelling units at the Lionshead Center Building located at 520
Lionshead Mall, Units ZdA,ZOe,308 and 309/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st
Filing.
pp|icant: Victor Cano Faro, Transcon |nvestments, |nc., and Jose Luis
Chain
Planner: AndY Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen stated that this request would allow units.on the second and
third floors of the Lionshead center Building to expand. He stated that GRFA
was available at this site.
F. A request for a major CCll exterior alteration to allow for the construction of an
addition to the Lionshead Arcade Building located at 531 East Lionshead
Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 3, Vail Lionshead lst Filing'
Applicant: Robert Lazier
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte showed the PEC where the proposed addition was to be located
on the site plan for the Lionshead Arcade Building. He said that the applicant
may alter the proposed addition prior to presenting it formally to the PEC.
Kathy Langenwalter requested that the applicant work out the technicalities
prior to this item being presented to the PEC.
Diana Donovan made a motion to approve the staff's recommendation for 90
day review periods for the above-lisied projects with Dalton Williams seconding
this motion. A 6-0 vote approved the siaff's recommendation for 90 day review
periods for the above-listed proiects.
6. A request for a wall height variance to allow for the construction of an avalanche
mitigation wall located al 4229 Nugget Lane/Lot 6, Bighorn Estates'
Applicant: Helen Dickinson
Pianner: Shelly Mello TABLED INDEFINITELY
Jelf Bowen made a motion to table this item indefinitely with Diana Donovan seconding
this motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this item indefinitely'
7. Approve minutes from December 13, 1993 PEC meeting.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the minutes from the December 13, 1993 PEC
meeting with Greg Amsden seconding the motion. A 6-0 vote approved the minutes
for the December 13, 1993 PEC meeting.
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
December 20, 1990 I
3. A request for a worksession for a variance to build in 40h slope and for a wall height
variance to allow for a duplex to be located at 2560 Kinnickinnick Road/a parcel of land
located in the N 1/2 ol lhe SW 1/4 of Section 14 T5S, B81W of the 6th P.M., Town ol
Vail, Colorado.
Applicant: Bobi Salzman/Carl DieE
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
4. Update on the Environmental Strategic Plan.
pta
ffierminationforthereviewperiodsoftheExt.eriorA|terationrequestSintheCC|
and CCll zone districts: '
Staff is recommending 90 day review periods for all of the following proiects:
A. A request for a major CCll exterior alteration and a height variance to allow for
the enclosure of the elevator shalt for the Antlers Condominiums located at 680
West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: AntlersCondominiumAssociation
Planner: Randy Stouder
-,r'---\-\fA. ) )e request for a major CCI exterior alteration and a height variance to allow for
lL_Z/ the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located at 227 Bridge
StreeVLots C and D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing'Vr-J fu?o+Y
/*^ c.
/o*", (p'o
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
A request for a major CCI exterior alteration for the Laughing Monkey to allow
an addition to the south side of the Creekside Building located at 223 East
Gore Creek Drive/a part of Tract A, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Jose GuzmanPlanner: Shelly Mello
A request for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance to the
Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates
offices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead lst Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
D.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
December20, 1993
AGENDA
No lunch will be served.
Site Visits
Ogilby
Salzman/Dietz
Drivers: Andy and Kristan
Public Hearino
C@b,f cz'49
2;00 p.m.
1. A short presentation by the applicant regarding a request to rezone a tract from
Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850
Kinnickinnick Road/more specifically described as follows:
A parcel ot tand in rhe Soulhwesr Ouaner of Secfion '14, Township 5 South, Range 8l Wssl ot the 6lh Principal Meridian, more
parlicularly described as lollows:
Eeginning al a point whence a brass cap set lor a wilness cornar for the West Ouarter ol said Section 14, bears (Nonh 29 degrees 28
minules 5l seconds Wesl, 1073.08 teet Oeed) (Nonh 43 Degrees 15 minulss 02 seconds Wes|,915.95 fest Measured): Thence Nonh
74 deg.ees 05 minules t9 seconds Easr, 10.76 feet; Thenco 183.62 feet aJong the arc ol a curve lo fte righl which are sublends a
chord bearing Norlh 8g degrees 12 minules 30 seconds Easl, 18'|.76 feelt Thence Souh 77 dogrees 40 minules 21 seconds Easl,
62.77 leeli Thence 147.43 feel along the arc of a curve lo lhe leh ri,hich arc sublends a cho.d bearing North 86 degrees 36 minules l7
seconds East, 145.60 leel; Thenco Nodh 70 degrees 52 minulos 55 seconds Easl,406.55 f6et; Thence 54.10 teel along lhs arc ol a
curve to the right which arc subtends a cho.d boaring Sorrh 47 deg.ees 20 minules 37 seconds Eas1,44.20 lgol Thence South 14
degrees 25 minules 50 seconds Wesl, 110.51 leel;
Thence Soulh 68 degrees 18 minutes 91 seconds Wes1,320.00 feer;
Thence Norlh l9 degrees 07 minules 05 seconds Wesl,50.00 feel;
Thence Soulh 77 degrees 48 minules 4t seconds West, 160.18 teel;
Thence Sourh l0 deg.ees 53 minutes 33 seconds Wesl,36.48 feel:
Thence Nonh 87 degrees 40 minules 06 seconds Wesl,937.72 teel:
Thence {Nodh 1l degrees 52 minutes l3 seconds Easl, 130.00 feel O€eO Nodh 1l degreos 55 minuos 31 secrnds Easl, '129.75 leel
Measured) lo lhe POINT OF SEGINNING.
Bea.ing from G.L.O. record lor South half of Seclion line belwsen Sections 14-15. (G.L.O. record Souh 01 d€grses 30.2 minues East)
(South 01 degrees 38 minutes 32 seconds Easl Measured)
Applicant: Juanita l. Pedotto
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
2. A request for a worksession for an amendment to a previously approved development
plan at The Vail Swim and Tennis Club, 2893 Kinnickinnick Road and a request for a
conditional use permit for four employee housing units/a portion of the SW 1/4, Section
14, T5S R81W of the 6th P.M., Town of Vail, Colorado.
Applicant: T. Charles Ogilby and Stanleigh H. Cole
Planner: Shelly Mello
Re:
20 December 1993
Mr. Mike Mollica
Town of Vail Community Development
1 11 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Govered Bddge Building
Alterations in CC1 - PEC Schedule
Dear Mike:
Enclosed please find 'l 14" floor plans for the above project for your consideration. The
elevations and model will follow as well as Corky's view corridor analysis.
Based on our understanding of the Ordinance and the Design Guidelines, we are in
compliance and do not need any variance to build the enclosed project.
Due to the complexity of the project, we would request the hearing process begin as
soon as possible and, therefore, to be on the 60 day calendar, lf a work session is
appropriate, it may give the developer some comfort in proceeding with the working
drawings.
We have about six weeks to do working drawings and construction of the project must
begin the day the mountain closes for ski season.
Sincerely,
THMEY/PRATT CHULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
Edward M. Gwathmey.
EMG/ad
Enclosures
copy to: Harry Frampton
Ross Bowker
4i Date
Date
APPLICATION FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I
VAIL VILLAGE
M@?tol;:Fvrt5 Ibn1o W- ffl€t/l\L-
ll.rs(lr*s # too 'Qfr-
or ]r ication
of PEC Meetin
I. Planning and Environmental Cornnission review is requ'ired for the a'l teration
of an existing building which adds or removes any enclosed floor area or
outdoor patio or the replacement of an existing building L0CATEO IN THE CCI
DISTRICT. FOLLOT,IING PEC APPROVAL, THE PROJECT MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE DRB.
application'wi1l not be accepted unti'l a'll information is submitted.
.. /' ,, I I'r/ t,/
NAME oF AppLrcANT cl cfi.:f /esy ,r'a^Y2,,'r, , / | 4 I *
I
The
A.'Anlfh't,Et-khN)eoosess aea,ta& 2770. .tO
J -^ /-:rf ltaa/ c) 6/L2-o PHONE
'4 '7B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTAITUC flfO5S € {)PU}/AT
/1 ,/ t-" /t r, t
ADDRESS oaX 54&). 4/0nJ, CO , Yti"zr
Pnone 'i4? - s'at/'
8/ ,#1/11<€/1 DuL?/'/
SIGNATURE( S)
ADDRESS
c. NAME 0F ot.lNER(S) (
PH)NE f7//732-
D. L0CATI0N 0F PROP0SAL: LEGAL Bwi- F 13 5-b
AoDRESS 4?',1 l&rEra 6TFv19r .
E. FEE tr?f* emotnD/ cr*(bb "M
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I,IILL/ (ry
REVIEl.l YOUR PROJECT.
II. PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO OETERI'IINE IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION I.IILL
BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINT-
MENT I.IITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION I.IILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS
FOR YOUR PROJECT BYTMRMSING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT
THE PEC MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE
A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUE-D. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. Improvement survey of property showing property lines and location of
building and any improvements on the land.
B. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject
, prtperty INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACR0SS STREETS, and their mailing
AddTeSSes. THE APPLICANT |.JILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
OVER
ccI
III. Four (4) copies of a site p'lan containing the following information:
A. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at a scaleOf I,. = 20. SHOWING EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE. Avariation of the sheet size or scale may be c..pproved by the CommunityDevelopment Department if justified.
B. The date, north arrow, scale and name of the proposed development
l,lITH ITS LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N shall be shown on the'site plan.
C. The existing topographic character of the site including existing
and proposed contours. This condition wi'll only be required for-an
expansion area where there is a change of two fbet of grade. NA
D. The existing and proposed landscgping, patios.
E. The lrrcation of all existing and proposed bui'ldings, structures
and improvements.
F. .A tit'le report to verify ownership and easements.
IV. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITTEN AND GRAPHIC FORM A PREPONDEMNCE
OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION INDICATING
THAT:
A. THE PROPOSAL IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PURPOSES OF THE CCI DISTRICT. AS SPECIFIED IN 'I8.24.0I0.
B. THE PROPOSAL SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN
GUIDE PLAN REGARDING:
" l. Pedestrianization2. Vehicle Penetration3. Streetscape Framewofk4. Street Enc'losure .5. Street Edge .6. Building Height7. Views8. Sun Shade Consideration
MANY OF THE ABOVE ITEMS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY GMPHIC MEANS, SUCH
AS SKETCHES, SIMULATIoNS, MoDELS (INCLUDINc NEIGHB0RING BUILDINGS),
PHOTOS, ETC.
IF THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A MJOR CHANGE TO
DESIGN GUIDE PLAN, THE PROCEDURE FOR CHANGES ARE
THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN
NOTED IN SECTION18.24.220(B).
C. THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE I.IITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
V. THE TOI.IN OF VAIL ZONING CODE FOR CCI ALSO DESCRIBES OTHER ZONING ISSUES
THAT THE APPLICANT MUST RESPOND TO IN i,IRITTEN OR GRAPHIC FORM.
VI. THE ZONING ADMINISTMTOR MAY DETERMINE THAT ADDITIONAL MATERIAL IS NECESSARY
FOR THE REVIEhl OF THE APPLICATION
VII. APPLICATIONS FOR EXTERIOR ALTEMTIONS OR MODIFICATIONS IN CCI INVOLVING
M0RE THAN 100 SQUARE FEET 0F FLOOR AREA ARE ONLY REVIEWED SEMI-ANNrAlli. lrrv
NEED TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FOURTH MONDAY OF MAY OR NOVEMBER. THE PECH0LDS A PRELIMINARY REVIEI.T sESsIoN wITHIN. zl DAys 0F THE susNiTTnL onrl.' n
PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE HF!.D I.IITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE PRELIMINARY REVIEI.I SESSION.
APPLICATIONS FOR THE ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT ADDS OR REMOVES ANY
ENCLOSED FLOOR AREA OF NOT MORE THAN lOO SQUARE FEET MAY BE SUBMITTED AT THE .
REqUIRED TIME OF THE MONTH FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REVIE|'l.
FoR MoRE SPECIFICS 0N THE REVIEl.t SCHEDULE, SEE SECTIoN 18.24.065 A5.
Govered Bddge Building
Adiacent Property Owners
North
South
East
West
Town of Vail
1 11 Soulh Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Pepi Gramshammer
Pepi Sports
231 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Dave Gorsuch
Gorsuch. Ltd,
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Ron Riley
Russell's Restaurant
228 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Rod Slifer
Slifer, Smith & Frampton
23O Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Beth Slifer
Slifer Designs
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Chuck Rosenquist
Gore Creek Plaza
3777 Mt. Veder
Napa, CA 94558
lla'rlq4 - odfao-rrs sLrr ou eN
o0o+THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and. Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordancs with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on February 14, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration of:
1. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Road and 383 Beaver
Dam Circle/Lots 2 & 3, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Applicant: John Tyler/John Tyler, Jr./Robert Tyler
Planner: Mike Mollica
z. A lbqutisl, tul d, yyurAsgsslo iut il lrli4gt \r\.,11 I'^lt ttvt dltvlat|(J aru Jiir.9€.ur\ vdllqrtvtj
to the Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates
offices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, lnc.Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a worksession for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance
to allow lor the expansion of dwelling unils at the Lionshead Center Building located at
520 Lionshead Mall, Units 208,209,308 and 309/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st
Filing.
Applicant: Victor Cano Faro, Transcon lnvestments, Inc., and Jose Luis
ChainPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle WesVLots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
Applicant: Walter Kirsch
Planner: Randy Stouder
5. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit to be
located at 1 358 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 21 , Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing.
Applicant Chris KempfPlanner: Randy Stouder
6. A request for a worksession to discuss proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District; Chapter 18.32, Agricultural and Open
Space District;and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District of the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Jim Curnutte
ao
A request for a worksession for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located at227 Bridge Streeulots C and
D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, VailVillage lst Filing.
8.A request for an SDD to allow for the redevelopment of the Comice Building and a
conditional use for the off-site relocation ol three existing employee housing units,
located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A part of Tract "B" and a part of Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, Slale of
Colorado, more particularly described as follows:
Commencino at thc Nodheasl corncr of Vail Villane, Firsl Filino: thence Norlh 79'46'00" West alono lhe
soulherty ltne ol u.s. Hignway No. ti a dtstance ot 3ti/.uti leet to lhe Noflheast cornet ol sad lract d ;
thence Soulh 10"14'00" West along the Easterly line of said Tract "8"; a distance of 198.31 feet to the
Souheasterly corner of said Tracl '8"; lhenca North 79"46'00' West along the Southerly line of said Tract
"B'a distance of 100.00 feet to the true poinl of beginning thence north 09'10'07" West a dislance ot 41.67
feel: thence Soulh 88.27'11" West a distance of 75.21 feel: lhence Soulh 27"13'37" Easl of distance of
77.37 teeti thence North 57'24'00" East a distance of 55.1 1 feet, more or less lo th€ true point of beginning.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicanl:
Planner:
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Mike Mollica
David Smith
Jim Curnufte
Rod and Beth Slifer
Kristan Pritz
9.
10.
A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved
exterior alteration proposal for the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeuPart of Lots B and
C, Block 5, Vail Village lst Filing.
A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Roacl/more
specifically described as follows:
A parcol ol lard In thE Southyr$t Ou.,t.r ot Sodlon 14, Torynshb 5 Souti, Rangs 81 Wo6l ol the 6lh Princlp.l Moddhn, moro Prniculsly d$ctb€d r8
lollowB:
g€ginnlng at a point whonca a br.s3 €p sat tor a wln.$ co.ner lor lh. W.3t Quane, ol rdd Secfion 11, b€rft lNonh 29 degFes 28 minules 51 s€co(|dl
West, tO73.Og leot Doed) (No(h,43 D.grr6 15 minuleg 02 seconds We3L 915.9€ l€€l M€.suioo: Thoncc Nonh 7,( d.9...3 05 mlnulos 19 sacods E.st.
10.76le€t: Ihonce 183.62 foot.bng the.rc d a c! o to lhe dght whlch ar. lubtends . chord b€.rlng Nodh 88 dig|g€r 12 mhules 30 seconds E.sl,
tgt.76 leeq thence Soulh 77 degr€eg ,40 mlnures 2l secon& EGt, 62.n fs€l; Thence 147-43 leet dong tho stc oi s .!rye to the lett wfibh rts lubten& .
dtord berrhg North 86 dgg.oes 36 mlnutC 17 seconds Easi, 145.d) tgqq lhotre Nodh 70 deg,ees 52 mlnut6 55 leconds Easl, ,l(S.55 l9€t Thttct tt.10
te€t .long the..c oI s cuwo to the dgll rvhlch .rc subten& . drord boatln! Sot Ur ,17 degre6 20 rdndsa 37 lgcond! E.st .14.20leet: Th.nco So{nh l,l
degr€es 25 mlnuEs 5l) s€con& Wesl 110-51 fest:
Th.n6 Sodh 68 deg.€€r 18 dnue€ 9l 3sconds Wost, 320.m hol;
Thanca Nonh 19 degre€s 07 mlnd6 G5 3econds w€6t, g).00 le€l;
Thenco So|.nh 7l dege€s 48 rnlnut€3 41 stconds l{te* 160,18leel;
thencs South l0 degrec! 53 mlnule! 3i3 ssconds West 38,,18 le€li
Thgnce No.th 87 degrges 40 mlnul€5 06 seconds Wes| 337.72 lggl:
thenca (Nodh I I degroos 52 mloutei 13 5.conds E|st, 130,m leol D6od) Nonh i I degroes 55 mlnulgs 3l secon& E3st, 129.75leet Me3sured) lo the
POINT OF SEGINNING.
B6erh9 l.om c.L.O. rocord lor South h.f ol Sedlon fine betwe€n Sodbn! l+ 15. (G.L.O. record South 01 d69r!o3 30.2 mlnues Esst] (Souh 0t dogr"$ 38
mlnut€ 32 s€cgrds E.st Msasurd)
Applicant:Juanita l. Pedotto
\oo ot
'l 1. A request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an
enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza
Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st
Filing.
Applicant Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom
ArmstrongPlanners: Randy StouderiShelly Mello
12. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road EasVan unplatted parcel located between VailVillage 7th Filing
and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
fi::::l" I:1,'1i':ly::'n "Tl"i::: :,::;:';::::^
13. A request for preliminary plat approval of a major subdivision (Trappers Run) on Lots
16, 19 and 21, Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally located north
of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge Subdivision.
Applicant: John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway Development
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED TO THE MARCH 14, 1994
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION MEETING