HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 2 LOT D CHRISTIANA AT VAIL 1972-1987 LEGALc//R/sr/4v/4
LO&E
cH&l,rn4#4
/Od:fI
to oo
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Developrnent Department
DATE: May 11 , L9B7
su&TEcr: Reguest for density and setback variances in order toconstruct additions to the Christiania Lodge located at356 Hanson Ranch Road on Lot D, Block 2, Vail VillageFirst Filing.Applicant: Paul Johnston
r. DESCRTPTION OF PROPOSED REMODEL
Mr. Paul Johnston, owner of the Christiania Lodge, isreguesting to add a third froor of five accommodation units,. to rearrange the existing lodge units, and to add corunonarea. This request requires density and setback variances.Below is a list of the expansions and adjustrnents made toeach floor.
A.Ground Floor (Garden Level_)
Expand Unit l-05 and cornbine Units l_07 and L09 for anincrease of 95 square feet of GRFA.
Convert l- dwelling unit to housekeeping office, 3OOsquare feet.
New laundry space, 379 square feet.
First Floor
Expand Unit 205 and cornbine Units 207 and 209 for anincrease in GRFA of 83 square feet.
L,obby and storage area: Lg6 square feet.
Lobby office: 103 sguare feet.
Sarahrs Bar: 366 square feet,.
Second Floor
Expand Unit 305 and combine Units 307 and 309 foradditional GRFA of 83 square feet.
Add Unit 30LA = 4l_8 square feet.
Common space: 402 square feet
Third Floor
B.
c.
D.
Five new accommodation units : ZrOLS square feet GRFA.
oo oo
Loft expansion for existing dwelling unit of 284 squarefeet.
Common space:. 344 square feet.
Essentially, three accommodation units and one dwellingunit are being lost due to the re-arrangement of rooms.Six new accommodation units are created through theexpansion for a net increase of 1 accommodation units.
E. Parking Lot paving and Landscaping
The proposal also inctudes the upgrading of the existingChristiania parking lot located across the street fromthe 1odge. V.A. owns the entire lot and uses thewestern portion of the parking area. The Christiania'leases the eastern half of the lot from Vail Associates.t: The owner proposes to asphatt his portion of the lot as
i ", welJ- as to add landscaping to the entire property.,. . , ,, Landscaping is proposed for the south and north sides of
r',., .'i"'.' the lot.L,y"t'r' i F. Mill Creek path Landscaping, Trash Enclosure
A foot path with a small seating area is proposed to bebuirt along the east side of Mirl creek. -rhe path wouldbe an informal stepping stone path with a seating benchadjacent to the creek. The path would be locatedbetween the christiania split rail fence and Mill creek.The owner is arso proposing to create a trash encrosurethat screens the todgers trash area from this path aswell as frorn pedestrians on Hanson Ranch Road. Alandscape buffer wour.d arso be added on the west side ofthe trash area.
IT. DESCRIPTTON OF VARIANCES
variance is leeded foi the additional acconrnodaEionts
A. Densitv Variance
The property is located in the public Accommod.ation zonedistrict which allow 9 dwelling units or l_8accommodation units. (please note that 2 accommodationunits or units without kitchens : one dwelling unit or aunit with a kitchen. ) Ihe existing lodge has 25accommodation units and two dwelling units which equals14.5 drrelling units. This creates a nonconforrning-situation in that the property is already S.S dweilingunits over the arrowabre 9 dwalring unit3. The propoialcall-s for a total of 28 accommodation units plus- onldwelling unit r.rhich equals l-5 dwelling units-. A
unit (.5 dwellin
-2-
B.
oo oo
The request does not require a GRFA variance. The lodgemay have up to L3 t232 square feet of GRFA. The existiig
GRFA. l: 2,397 square feet. proposed GRFA inctud.ing the-new third floor would be LO,O75 square feet. Theproperty would have 3,1-57 square feet of GRFA remainingafter the rernodel is built.
20? Common Area Variance
Common area includes halIs, closets, lobbies, stairwaysand common enclosed recreation facilities. The allowedcommon area is 2,646square feet of cornmonl-r955 square feet ofaccessory office, andfor the 1,574
square feet. Presently, 2t255area exists. The proposal addsadditional hall space, lobby area,
-storage. A variancg is necessaryfeetof cornnffiare feet.
Setback Variances
The Public Accommodation zone district requires 20 footsetbacks on all sides of the property. Tlie existingfront setback is L5 feet due to the encroachment of thenorthwest corner of the lodge. A zero setback exists onthe east side of the property as the Christiania Lodgeconnects directly with the Christiania Cond.ominiums tothe east. A L7 foot setback exists on the west side ofthe property as the southwest corner of the buildingencroaches three feet into the 20 foot setback area.The rear setback is 20 feet.
The proposal maintains all of the existing setbacksexcept for the front and west side setbacks. Asecond €loor cantilevered office and acconnodaEion unitover the Christiania,s maioot encroa t into the 20 foot front setback. The 3foot encroachment requlies-E- vEilance.
A proposed porte cochere off of the nain entrance wiIIhave a support column that wiII be located at theproperty line. A zero setback is needed for the supportcolurnn. the roof of
overhang would not extend beyond thE-tIsEIng 3 foot
The new third floor of accommodation units expands anadditional 3 feet into the west setback creating a fa
planter encroachment.
foot setback. A variance is necessa
owable of
encroachment.
-3-
for the 3 foot
oo oo
rTI. CHRTSTIANIA LODGE ZONTNG STATTSTICS
Zone District: Public Accornmodation
Site Arear .3797 acres or L6r540 sf
Density: [25 dwelling units (d.u. )/acre] [2 a.u. = 1_ d.u. ]
GRFA:
Allowed: l-8 a.u. or 9 d.u.
Existing: 25 a.u. + 2 d.u. or 14.5 d.u.
Existing units over allowable: 5.5 d.u.
Proposed: 28 a.u. + i. d.u. or L5 d.u.
Difference: 1 a.u. or ,5 d.u.
Total anount over
allowed after rernodel: LZ a.u. or 6 d.u.
( .80)
Allowed:Existing:
Proposed:
Remainingafter addit.
208 Common Area:
Allowed: 2,646 sfExisting: 2,255 sfProposed: 4,22O st
Amount overallowed: 11574 sf
Note: 80 sf of common area
condominiums
L3,232
7 ,397
10, 075
3,157
(.20 of allowable GRFA: Hal1s, closets,lobbies, stairways, cornmon enclosedrecreational facilities)
(30 I as opposed to 20?)
is added to the Christiania
GRFA)
10? Accesso
Allowed: L323 sfExisting: 780 sf
Proposed: 1146 sf
e, Rest Bar, Recreational Retail: (L0? of
-4-
oo ot
Setbacks:Required, 20r all sides
Existing: Front: t5 r
E. Side or
W. Side L7 r
Rear 2Ol
Proposed:
Front:
Porte cochere, support columns and roof = OlRoof overhangs 3r on T.O.V. right-of-way
Second floor office + a.u., 3r encroachment:l7r setbackExpanding third floor, 4 | encroachment, rnaintainsexisting encroachment = L5| setback
East Side:game, 0 setback
West Side:
Expanding third floor, additional 3 | encroachment = 14 r
setback
Rear:
Same, 20t setback
Site Coveraqe:
Allowed:Existing:
Proposed:
Remaining
Landscaping:
Reguired:Existing:
Proposed:
Height:
Allowed:Existing:
Proposed:
Under by:
(.55 of sj-te area)
9,O9'l sf
5r235 sf
6,090 sf
3,007 sf
(.30 of site)
4,962 sf7f490 sf
61635 sf or 408 of site
48r sloping roof, 45r flat roof
36t
40r- 6|'
7t- 6n
-5-
oo oo
PARKING
Grd Flr
lst Floor
2nd Floor
3rd Floor
Use
I a.u.
L d.u.
I a.u.
Sarahts 7]-4
9 a.u.
1 d.u.
0
# spaces
5.27
2.O
5.27
sf- 6.00 7L4
5.85
2 .00
Proposed
Use
7 a.u.
7 a.u.
sf + 32 seats
9 a.u.L du + loft
5 a.u.
# Spaces
4 .97
4 .69
L0. 00
6.15
2.00
4 .02
Christiania
Condos 5a.', .1i8i,, .: | ...-'.. ?ir:.P::
'"i' i::'?) )t
or'36 spaces
26.39
9. 00-55 .se
reguired
31. 83
9,00
40. B3
4L spaces reqd
- 36 qrandfathered
5, spacesfor addition
is handled on site. Andue to the restriping of
33 on sile \3 spac{lrandfathered\
T!?.1?r parking requirement of 5 spacesadditionat two spaces are also availablethe lot and the use of valet parking.
IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Consideration of Factors:
A.The relationship of the resuested varLance to other existinor potential uses and EtrucEuEE n the vic
upon review of criteria and Findings, section i-8.6r.o60 ofthe municipal code-, the Department-oi cornrnunity Developmentrecommends denial based upon the following faclors:
Density Variance:
The remodel of existing rodge rooms and the new accommodationunit are very compatible wittr ttre existing "r"" u"astructures in the area. A view analysis irso inaicates thatthe third froor addition willr have iini*"i irl""l= o'views
iT:I adjacent_p-roperties. The surrounding proierties areerrner zoned pubLic Accommodation or corunerliai core r. Bothzone districts promote lodge uses.
-6-
oo oo
The 20? conmon area variance is directly related to thedensity variance. fn order to add new rooms and upgrade theIodge, it is necessary to add adeguate lobby, hal-lwiy, andaccessory office space. The additj.onal common area that isproposed will inprove the functioning of the lodge and is notin excess of what is a reasonable amount for these uses.
Setback Variances:
Front:
The porte cochere support colurnn and roof overhangprovide an improvernent for the entry to the lodge. Theencroachment is an unenclosed structure which decreasesthe irnpact of the encroachrnent. Town of Vail public
Works and Fire Departments have also reviewed the
encroachment and have no problem with the location ofthe structure. There is also an existing planter inthis area that encroaches three feet beyond the propertyIine. The porte cochere would not extend theencroachment beyond this point.
The second floor office and accornmodation unit expansiondoes decrease the 2O foot setback to L7 feet. However,the front setback is already 15 feet at its narrowestpoint. For this reason, staff believes that the secondfLoor expansion will have no negative impacts onadjacent properties.
The expansion of the third floor merely rnaintains theexisting front setback of 15 feet.
IVest Side Setback:il
The expansion of the third./floor decreases the westsetback from 17 feet to-:Jfeet. However, an existingroof overhang and second floor balcony already create a14 foot setback. It is felt that the new third floorbay windows that create the three foot encroachment willhave minimal impact on adjacent properties.
East Side Setback:
With respect to the zero setback on the east side, thisencroachment maintains what is already existing on theproperty.
In general, the staff believes that the setback variances donot impact the property or adjacent uses any more than thepre-existing setbacks do. For this reason, the setbackvariances are considered to have no major negative impacts onadjacent properties.
-7-
B.
oo
treatment amonq sobjectives of
oo
the vicinity or to attain thee without grant of special privil
-8-
Densit,v Variance:
To approve the additional accommodation unit under theexisting review criteria for a variance would be considered agtlnt,of special privilege. However, staffrs opinion is thatthis is,the type of proposal which the Village -nlan isdesigned to encourage as long as zoning standards are met.Due to the fact that the village plan is not approved, thestaff must continue to work with the variance -ciiteria.
Given this situation, the approval of the accommodation unitis considered to be a grant of special privirege as there isno hardship that warrants approvil of tle project.
Setback Variances:
The staff believes it would not be a grant of specialprivilege to approve the setback variinces, as th"encroachments due to the remod.el do not increase beyond thosethat already exist on the property except for the westsetback which has mininal inpacts, as the encroachrnent is dueto several third floor bay windows,
The effect of th" r.grg:t.d y.ri.n.@opulation, transportation and trafflc
"safetv.
This proposal will have no inpacts on this criteria.
D.Such other factors and criteria as the commission deemsapplicabletheroposed var
Vail VilLage Master plan
Even -though the Vili.age plan is not approved at this tine,staffrs opinion is that the plan,s prelirninary goals andobjectives generarry reflect the opinions "i in5-pranningcornmission and Town council as weli as community members whohave reviewed these statements at pubric neetinis. The planemphasizes the upgrading of lodgesl tne additioi ofaccommodation units, the irnprovement of the pedestrianexperience, as well as the Lnhancement of opLn space.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literalinterpretation g.+a entoat"""=arty of
oo oo
This proposal supports the plants objectives by inprovingeyisting lodge units and adding new units while complyinqwith site development standard.s. The paved parking aiea andlandscaping improve the appearance of an existing eyesore ina very visible portion of the Village. The pedestrian path
and seating area also enhance open space for pedestrians.Please see the attached list of Village plan coals andObjectives which relate to this project.
Urban Desiqn Guide PIan
Sub-Area Concept No. 8: MiIl Creek walking path, west sideMilI Creek. Path completes linkage from pirate ship andmountain path to core Creek Drive.
The Urban Design Guide Plan calls out for the path connection
between the bike path and Hanson Ranch Road. The ownerproposes to add a stone foot path which is a positive
improvement to the pedestrian experience in the Villagearea.
Even though the path was originally proposed for the westside of MiIl Creek, staff believes that the east sideprovides a nicer walking experience. The west side of thecreek has a trash room for Cyranors as well as severalutility boxes which make it an unpleasant area to walkthrough.
Parking Improvernents
The proposal includes upgrading the parking 1ot by addinglandscaping and paving. The owner leases this parking spacefron Vail Associates.
It is true that under any expansion plan for the lodge, evenif it did not require Planning Commission review, the staffwould request that the parking area be landscaped and paved.
However, the owner is also proposing to 1andscape therenainder of the parking lot which is owned by VailAssociates. It is felt that this landscaping will provide a
much needed buffer between the parking 1ot and adjacent uses.
The Pl?nning and Environrnental Cornmission shall make thefollowinq findings before qrantinq a vafiahce:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grantof special privilege inconsistent with the lirnitations onother properties classified in the same district.
-9-
oo oo
That the granting of the variance witl not be detrirnental tothe public health, safety or welfare, or materiarry injuriousto properties or improvements in'the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of thefollowing reasons:
The strict or riteral interpretation or enforcement oftfe specified regulation would resul_t in practj_caldifficultly or.unnecessary physical hardsiripinconsistent with the objeclives of this titfe.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances orconditions appricable to the same site of the variance' that do not ippfy generally to other properties in thesame zone.
The strict interpretation or enforcement of thespecified regulation would deprive the applicant ofprivileges enjoyed by the owners of othei-properties inthe same district.
VT. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
staff reconrnends approval of the setback variances and denialof the density reguest. The setback variances can besupported, as the encroachments are not increased frorn thoset|3! nresently exist on the site. Due to the fact that thevrl-rage Pran is not yet approved by the Town council , stafflp gniP+" to support the density reguest. our opinion isthat this is the_lvee of proposll that the villale planencourages' as alr_ zoning standards are basically rnet. staffwourd like to be able to support this type of prject once thevillage plan is approved. However, the-itaff i"6rs that wemust try to be consistent with our decision naking and. usethe existing criteria for variance requests. n"i thesereasons, we must recommend denial of the project.
rf the Planning commission approves this request, staff wouldrecommend the approvar- include the forlowinf conditions:
1. The christiania parking lot be paved and randscaped. Theproposal would arso includ.e landsclping the western-portionof the lot owned by Vail Associates.
2. The owner would comprete the pedestrian path between theexisting bike path and Milr creei< court nuiiaing. This pathwoul-d also include a smal_I seating area.
-10-
lo ol
3. The existing trash room on the northwest corner of thesite would be enclosed and screened by landscaping.
4. One of the new accommodation units wiII be restricted asshort term rental units permanently and witl not be taken outof the short term rental program at any time. Therestriction wiII continue to apply even if the project iscondominj-umized or the ownership changes. This conditionshall- be written in a legal statement subnitted to staff bythe owner before a building permit will be issued.
- 11-
oo oo
APPLTCABLE VAIL VILI3GE PI,AN GOALS AND OBJECTTVES
Goal #1i Encourage high guality redevelopment whilepreserving the unigue architectural scale of the village inorder to sustain Vailrs sense of cornmunity and identitf.
obiective #2: provide incentives for the upgrading andredevelopment of residential and cornmerciat-racitities.
Policy: Allow increased levels of development asidentified by the Action plan orconsistent with the Vail Village MasterPlan.
GoaI #2: Foster a.strong tourist industry and to promoteyear-around economic heaLth and viability for the irillage andfor the community as a whole.
oF-iective #3: Increase the number of residential unitsthroughout the Village area available for short-termovernight acconmodations.
Policy: The development of accommodation units arestrongly encouraged. Any residential units thatare developed above existing density levels shal1be designed or rnanaged in a manner Lhat makes themavailable for short-term rental .
qbjeg!+ve_19! Encourage the continued upgrading andrenovation of existing rodging and commerciar ficilitiesto better serve the needs of our guests.
9Pjective. #F: rdentify and irnprenent improvementsthroughout the Village to embellish the pnysical designfeatures and ped.esstrian amenities of puLric "p-""".GoaI #3: Recognize as anaintaining and enhancingthe Village.
top priority the importance ofthe walking experience throughout
9!iegl+e-4: Physically irnprove the existingpectestrl_anr/vays throughout the Village by landicaping andother improvements.
Pglicy: Require streetscape improvements in andglo{r9 pedestrianways in conjunclioin with anyinf i.11 development- proj ectsl
-12-
oo oo
Goal #4: Preserve existing open space areas and expandgreenbelt opportunities.
Objective #1: Recognize and improve the open space
found throughout the Village (landscaped buffers,plazas, parks, active recreation areas and open space)
and to cognj-zant of the different role each p1ays.
Goal #5: Improve the transportation system andinfrastructure by increasing both its capacity and efficiencythroughout the Village area.
Objective #L: Meet the parking demand throughout theVillage by the utilization of both public and privateparking facilities.
-13-
o
PRESENT
J.J. Collins
Diana Donovan
Bryan Hobbs
Peggy Osterfosssid schultz,fim Viele
ABSENT
Pam Hopkins
The neeting r^rasJin Viele.
Planning and Environmental Cornmission
May LJ-, L987
STAFF PRESENTxrIEtan-EIEZ
Betsy Rosolack
caLled to order at 3:OO p.M.by the chairman,
1.A recruest for densit andconstructaddons to356 Hanson Ranc RoaFirst Fi1
s in order toe located a
Va I Villa
Kristan Pritz explained -the. reguest and showed. view analysi-sdrawings, elevations and site and froor prans. she exprainedthat the staff recommended deniat, but ii tne pEc approved therequest, the staff recomrnended 4 conditions of approval .
ilohn Perkins, architect for the project, stated that theproject was not giving the chrisii.ii. a lot oi ieimruisernent,but was more back-of-house space t" inpr"v"-tr," lperations.
PauI Johnston, the. applicant, stated that up to this time, theChristiania had not.LlA enough conmon area, that whoeverdesi-gned the christiania did not design u-iuig"-.nough entryand robby area. He mentioned that colnpetitioi has escar-atedamong lodges. Regarding the l_andscapiirg ot tfre-parking areanext to Hanson Ranch Roid, he felt tirat-the ranolcapi"{ *ightnot survive because_of snow p1ows. Kri-stan answerea that the
1?13=:lting may need more aeiiqn work but could re aesigneawlErt snow removal considerations.
sid questioned how rnuch landscaping courd be put between theparkinq lot and street. ne feli tfrat sinc"-til"-pl"n basicallysugno5tgf the goa)-s of the village Master plan, ie rert i.t wasnot.right to penali-ze the appricint because the plan was notfinished. sia teft amenitil-s should be encoui;g;;.
PauI added that the addition to Sarah,s was nainly forserving breakfast. He also mentioned. that he has had ongoingconversations with vA concerning naki"g ih"--purri"q rot intounderground parking, but that s5 far the conversation was rnoreof a monol_ogile.
ck variancstiania
o
Peggy agreed with sid. J.J. wondered why the christiania didnot take advantage of the attic space and add even more roomsto rnaximize the iaaition. paul responded. that the basic roofline shourd be maintained and that the attic space had a veryrow ceil"ing. J.J- fert that the unit developrnint was not. anj-ssue ds;€RFAr.landscaping and site coverage standard.s wertc-- ..r._maintained. Jirn viele agreed. Diana felt the DRB should find "''-.:..out which trees would be removed and which saved.
J.J. moved and Bryan Hobbs seconded to approve the reguest withfindings including trthere are exceptions -or extraordiriarycirumstances or conditions applicaLre to the same site of thevariance that do not apply generally to other properties in thesame zone. rr Also given as the reason was the tact that theproposar conformed to the virlage Master plan. The vote was 6-o hrith conditions I through a in the memo and landscaping mustbe addressed at DRB, especially trees that will be 1ost.
2.reguest for an amendment toastrict in o rtoc e a tennot at Vail Run Reso SDD5Applicant: Mr. Will an F1e her
cial develos court to a
Kristan 3ritz presented the rnemo and showed a site plan. shestated that the staff recommended approval of the rEquest.
Bill Fleisher, the applicant, added inforrnation about thepresent parking situation. He proposed building a berm with awall of railroad ties with Br-l-or trees. rf tbere is no berm,he proposed that the trees be t5' high. He said he may alsoput trees in front of the bubble.
Ann_surlivan, manager of sirnba Run to the west, distributed andread a letter of protest stating that noise, lighting,pollution, and reducti.on of varue of sirnba Run londolniniurnswere the reasons for the protest. A letter r,,ras alsodistributed and read from Nichoras Giancamilli protesting theparking 1ot.
Bill Fleisher responded that he felt the parking lot would beL5 feet fron the property line and that there wis another 30feet to the simba Run building. He felt that the upper simbaunits would not be affected because people look out, not down.He stated that there were two courts in the t,ennis bubble. Healso stated that the parking rot would be used nainly for carswhich park alr day long, so the noise factor would b6 nininatand that Vail Run did not experience undesirables in theirparking lot. He felt that Simba was aware of the propety linewhen they built their units.
Ann surlivan repried that the 12 units that she was referringto would look down at the parking lot. She did not feel thatL5 foot trees would buffer the parking lot from the higherunits.
-2-
o f,i-fa n
PI.ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
May 11 , L987
2:ls P.M. site Visits
3:00 P.M. Public Hearing
- 1. A request for density and setback variances inorder to construct additions to the ChristianiaLodge located at 356 Hanson Ranch Road.Applicant: Mr. paul Johnston
' 2. A request for an amendment to a specialdevelopment dist,ict in order to change a tenniscourt to a parking lot at Vail Run Resort (SDDS)Applicant: Mr. William Fteisher
3. Work session on Blurs and Sweet Basil deckenclosures
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SURTECT:
Applicant: paul Johnston
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REMODET_,
Planning and Environme
Community Development
May 11, 1987
Request for density and setback variances in order toconstruct additions to the Christiania Lodge located. at356 Hanson Ranch Road on Lot D, Block 2, VaiI ViIIageFj-rst Filing.
Mr. Paul Johnston, owner of the Christiania Lodgte, isrequesting to add a third floor of five acconmoaation units,to rearrange the existing rodge units. and to add cornmon
lrga. .This request requires density and setback variances.Below is a list of the expansions ana adjustnents made toeach floor.Addbr(r.
htl'q,L3 A.\f .
6pnrn o[ ]fDl.)
tAaAr{5 gAp_
I $ U.- A. Ground Floor (Garden Level)
Expand Unit 1o5 and conbine Units t_07 and LO9 for anincrease of 95 square feet of GRFA.
Convert i- dwelling unit to housekeeping office, 3OOsquare feet.
New laundry space, 3Zg square feet.
B. First Floor
Expand Unit 205 and combine Units 207 and 209 for anincrease in GRFA of g3 sqluare feet.
Lobby and storage area: l_96 square feet.
Lobby office: 1O3 sguare feet.
Sarahrs Bar: 366 sguare feet.
Second Floorc.
Expand Unit 305 and conbine Units 307additional GRFA of 83 square feet.
Add Unit 3ol_A = 4LB square feet.
Common space: 402 square feet
Third Floor
and 309 for
D.
Five new accommodation units = 2ror-5 square feet GRFA.
Loft expansion for existing dwelling unit of 284 squarefeet.
Common space: 344 square feet.
Essentially, three accommodation units and one dwellingunit are being lost due to the re-arrang:ement of rooms.Six new accommodation units are created throuqh theexpansion for a net increase of L accommodati6n units.
Parkinq Lot Pavinq and Landscaping
The.proposal also includes the upgrading of the existingChristiania parking lot tocated across ihe street frornthe lodge. V.A. owns the entire lot and uses thewestern portion of the parking area. The Christianialeases the eastern half of the lot from Vail Associates.The owner ses t his lon the lot as
AS 1 e entlre
soutn and no
r.sides ofthe lot.
f. Mil-1 Creek Path Landscaping, Trash Enclosure
A foot path with a small s
I The path wouldseating bench
located
and Mil} Creek.
o stepping stone path wadjacent to
between the
the creek.Christiania The path would besplit rail fence
PA
rh also pro to createscreense J.odcte s th asas trom escr ans on Hanson Ranch Road.I pe ef I.7O d also bea 0 t side ofthetrasharea.
VARIANCESIT. DESCRTPTTON OF
A. Density Variance
The property is rocated in the pubric Accommodation zonedistrict which allow 9 dwellin
rr1l6LD(r
JS A(t I au-
€gnIBpdalia:urdts dwellinq units or 18
fficcommodation
LIow 9 9lveltinq units or 18
--=.s;-.;rr.rxr. qIE. \5rscrl'e rtrJus LIlctL z crgL:(JfllmoqaE]_onunits or units without kitchens = one dwelling unit or aunit with a kitchen. )accommodation uni alseThistionthatproperttaIIdwEF.Id9 dwell units.The proposalcdttg- i-orr-i-IifrIts plusdwelling unit which equals L5 dwe]ling unitsi Avariance is needed for the additional-accorunodaD-
one
on
-2-
[o 6LfA The request does not reguire a GRFA variance. The lodgemay have up to L3,232 square feet of GRFA. The existincr
3,\5)r0,,^l0l*inltenia 11 z,isz =qoli. feer. proposed GRFA includ.ins rhe-, fJnew third floor would be LO,075 square feet. Thevproperty would have 3,1_52 square feet of GRFA remainingafter the remodel is built.
B. 204 Conmon Area Vari.ance
Pqd-d.0-- k?
F?Dur \5'. l+'ffi D', o'
lJISlr l)l i{'.
paar AD' ;LD
Comnon area includes halls, closets, lobbies, stairwaysand common enclosed recreation facilities. The allowed
cornmon area is 2,646 square feet. presently, 2,25ssquare feet of conmon area exists. The proposal adds1r965 square feet of additional halL spa-e,-lobby area,
The new third floor of accommodation units expands anadditional 3 feet into the west setback creatinq a J_4foot sel,bac
encroachment.
ltlrK;,frl^l.
Oun'r Dsdb*Lj'hl€,t\o)€column. the roof of the poffi
overhang would not extend beyond the ExIEEIng 3 foot
accessory office, and storage.is necessafor the 1,574 e feet of e
c.Setback Variances
The Public Accommodation zone district resuires 20 footsetbacks on all sides of the property. tlie existingfront setback is l-5 feet due to the encroachrnent of thenorthwest corner of the lodge. A zero setback exists onthe east side of the property as the Christiania l_,odgeconnects directly with the Christiania Condominiums tothe east. A l-7 foot setback exists on the west side ofthe property as the southwest corner of the buildingencroaches three feet into the 20 foot setback area.The rear setback is 2O feet.
The proposal maintains all of the existing setbacksexcept for the front and west side setbacks. Asecon{ floor cantilevered office and accommodalion unitover the Christianiars entrance creates a OAoot encroachment in 2O foot front se ck.Theencroachment re
A proposed porte cochere off of the main entrance willhave a support column that will be located at theproperty line. A zero setback is needed for the suDDorc
planter encroachment.
-3-
ITT. CHRTSTIANIA LODGE ZONING STATISTICS
Zone District: public Accornmodation
Site Area: .3797 acres or !6,540 sf
Density: [25 dwe]-Ling units (d.u.) /acre) [2 a.u. = 1 d.u.]
GRFA:
Allowed: l-8 a.u. or 9 d.u.
Existi-ng: 25 a,u. + 2 d.u. or 14.5 d.u.
Existing units over allowable: 5.5 d.u.
Proposed: 28 a.u. + l_ d.u. or L5 d.u.
Difference: l- a.u. or .5 d.u.
Total amount overallowed after remodel: 12 a.u. or 6 d.u.
( .80)
Allowed:
Existing:
Proposed:
Renainingafter addit.
20e Common Area!
L3,232
7 ,397
1"0, 075
3 tL57
(.20 of allowable GRFA: Ha1Is, closets,lobbies, stairways, conmon enclosedrecreational facil ities)
Allowed: 2,646 sfExisting: Z,2SS sfProposed: 4,220 sf (30 g as opposed to 20?)Amount overallowed: 1,574 sf
Note: 80 sf of common area is added to the Christianiacondominiurns
, Recreationa], netail: (10g ofGRFA)
Allowed: l-323 sfExisting: 780 sfProposed: 1146 sf
-4-
Setbacks:Reguired, 2Or all sides
Existing: Front: L5 |
E. Side Ol
W. Side L7'Rear 2Ol
Proposed:
Front:
Po*e cochere, support columns and roof = O,Roof overhangs 3r on T.O.V. riqht-of-way
Second floor office + a.u., 3r encroachrnent=i_7r setback
Expanding third f1oor, 4 | encroachment, rnaintainsexisting encroachrnent = l-5t setback
East Side:
Sertre;-Tsetback
West Side:
Expanding third floor, additional 3 t encroachment = l_4 |
setback
Rear:Sete, 20r setback
Site Coveraqe:
Allowed:Existing:
Proposed:
Remaining
I-,andscaping:
Required:Existing:
Proposed:
Height:
Allowed:
Existing:
Proposed:
Under by:
( .55 of si-te area)
9,097 sf
5,235 sf
6,090 sf
3,007 sf
(.30 of site)
4,962 sf
'7 t49O sf
6,635 sf or 408 of site
48r sloping roof, 45r flat roof
36,
40t- 6rl
1.- 6r.
-5-
PARKING
Grd FIr
lst Floor
2nd Floor
3rd Floor
Use
8 a.u.1d.u.
8 a.u.
Sarahrs 714
9 a.u.I d.u.
o
# Spaces
5.27
2.O
5.27
sf= 6.00
5. 85
2.00
USe
7 a.u.
7 a.u.
7L4 sf + 32 seats
9 a.u.I du + Ioft
5 a.u.
# spaces
4.97
4 .69
t-0. oo
6. 15
2.00
4.02
Christiania
Condos
26.39
9. O0
rs Jeor
36 spaces required
33 on site3 space grandfathered
3l-.83
9. 00
40. 83
4L spaces reqd
- 36 grandfathered
5 spaces
rooms and the new accommodationthe existing uses and
'/-' ' t '\ for addition
Irl:,new parkins requir. "$**#;n!#gi$\ianarea on sfte. An
I l::r:1:"?r.ry." spaces are also available due to the restriping ofr Ene roE and tlre use of val_et parking.
IV. CRTTERIA AND FTNDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section l_B.6t.060 ofthe municipal code-, the Department-oi corurnunity Developmentrecommends denial based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors:
CCX+ PA'
$',ru uieu)*,id,
Density Variance:
The remodel of existing lodgeunit are very compatiUfe wiitrstructures in the area. Athe third floor
romeither zon-
zone districts promote lodge uses.
lso indicates thatminimalon vJ_ewsThe surrounding propEitlEs-Erec Accomnodation or Commercial Core I. Both
-6-
Shd^-
The 2O? conmon area variance is directly related to thedensity variance. fn order to add new rooms and upgrade theIodge, it is necessary to add adequate lobby, hallwiy, andaccessory office space. The additional conmon area that isproposed will irnprove the functioning of the lodge and is notin excess of what is a reasonable amount for these uses.
Setback Variances:
, il i;; i,1. olr.^ :::5":l*"Xi':"3"fl#:-::T':ifi-"*il"Till"ffi:"t13" ",- | ' | *[.the structure. There is also an existing planter in,-lf,rtiH0/^cf0a(t\1,^0(';i;r=-;;;;-$;i encroaches three feer beyond the properrynH rdJ*JLQ-!I"l' line. The porte cochere would not extend the
encroachment beyond this point.
The second floor office and accomnodation unit expansiondoes decrease the 20 foot setback to L7 feet. Hor,,/ever.the front setback is already 1_5 feet at its narrowestpoint. For this reason, staff believes that the secondfloor expansion will_ have no negative impacts onadjacent properties.
The expansion of the ttrird floor merely maintains theexisting front setback of L5 feet.
ss*/A [@
l)' a\<qd$ il
ls'or' IJU)torruf
\ West Side Setback:
I rji\ j
W"00 rI ShdfR. The expansion of the third floor decreases the west
.erd$do-i' h{iq+\ ;::i":}":il:L':"5":1.
daruorl'hrr tDi\dd0J ii:iaffi"r.. rt is felr rhat the nernr third f100r':'PJ r, 14- foot setback. It is felt that the aeu__tnirO_:fqqgrl-ta b-afffinilohrs -€n-at Create the three foot encroachment w
El diU-k I trave rnini-nrat-irnq.1Q on_- a-trJIhg bok t' dq*f*_lu:" rni,ninal irpIc! -on
-a-o.U East Side Setback:A\ .trcllt L Dr{.rfl Detf'acK:
VtaU*-l"N*\\ with respect to the zero setback on the east side, this
0l$C0n,OS \ Ut$q encroachment maintains what is already existing on the
;\lto.dA. U Property'
\r- ,/, \
U In general . the staff believes that the setback variances donot impact the property or adjacent uses any more than thepre-existing setbacks do. For this reason, the setbackvariances are considered to have no rnajor negative impacts onadjacent properties.
. The porte cochere support column and roof overhang
|.,,provide an improvement for the entry to the 1odge. theaf- lf - ---- --'--t\-Yl-,."V encroachment is an unenclosed structure which decreases, the inpact of the encroachment. Town of Vail public
-7-
The deqree !o which relief from the strict and. literalint".p."t.!i o., i={ta"""."ry to oftreatment amonqi Eites e vj-cinity or to atta
\
objectives of ut
Densitv Variance:
To approve the additional accomrnodationexisting revielr criteria for a variance
rivil
unit under the
would be considered ag-r?nt.of special privilege. Howeverthis is the type of prop6sat wrrffi-E
Given this situation, the approval of the accommodation unitis considered to be a grant-6r speciar privireq"-as there isno hardship that warrants approvll of tlre proj6ct.
n Such
setback variances:dp ruf .irii{@lttbo.f I o<o+l
^_una{
si{a-
The staff believes it would not be a grantthe setback variances
of special
tfiF_talready. e]:ist on the propertv
secbaclc whj_ch has ninirnal irnpacts,
The effect of th@ on light and air,
utiliti"", a.rd prrblicsafety.
This proposal will have no inpacts on this criteria.
other factors and criteria as the comrnission d.eems
vair. virrase Master pr.an (Sn r^yyllrlh- l/r'11"6 lh^-60"!<
Even^though the Village plan is not approved at this tine,staffrs opinion is that the plan's prliirnirrury qo"ls andoDlectrves generally reflect the opinions of Lne planningcommission and Town council as well as community members whohave reviewed these statements at public ,o""Ci"ii=. The planemphasizes.the upgrading of lodgesl ttre additioi ofaccommodation units, the irnprovement of the pedestrianexperience, as werl as the -enhancement of opin space.r1qraip-lod*p hbb!,I'a\I, ,{*iisu,lt"r+*,"**
iulll- : -B- l*przqfturd ,,r , l
i^p,il{ t{d "9rp^u/^,1 fttt / lot-Up t"wrJ: b,ra.d{c"+-e\i
o,r^honq- 40t\ I0trtL * r'udix rik t{lv. fro^da^d^ 'r\V
apnl e to the roposed variance.
is that
e Village Plan is not approved,thestaff must continue to work with the variance -ciiteria.
e o approve as EIte
ond those
except
as the
for the we
to several third floor bay windows.
encroachment is due
This.proposal supports the ptanrs objectives by iruprovingexisting lodge units and adding nehr units while cornplyin!.with sj-te development standards. The paved parking area-andlandscaping inprove the appearance of ln existing eyesore in. y"ry visible portion of the Village. The pedeitrian pathand seating area aLso enhance open space for pedestrian3.Please see the attached lj-st of Village plan Goals andObjectives which rel-ate to this project.
-tir,\c.Jo ti,dr5\g sub-Area
' !,1i11 cre
i'do
Concept No. 8:Mi-ll Creek wa
path to core_-Cregk
The Urban Design Guide plan ca1ls out for the path connectionbetween the bike path and Hanson Ranch Road. The ownerproposes to add a stone foot path which is a positive
improvement to the pedestrian experience in tLe Villagearea.
Even thouqh
siae-6E-l,rir t$e, pq-th Wae origi.:ralf+r-propgsed for the west
wal l-ence.Ihe
room ror
an unpleasant area to walkt+'sougb-
Associates. ft
nuch needed buffer between the
The Planninq and E4]rironmental Commission sha1l make the
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grantof special privilege inconsistent with the lirnitations onother properties classified in the same district.
n* o^O n\c!- , prov6des a nicer
ut^tfiroilralt". ffi
f0ltv\. '
Parking Improvernents
The proposal includes upgrading the parking lot by addinglandscaping and paving. The orirner leases this p-rking ipacefrom VaiI Associates.
ft is true that under any expansion plan for the lodge, evenif it did not require planning Cornrnilsion review, the staffwould reguest that the parking area be landscaped and paved.However, the ovrner is also proposing to landscape theIl(Jweve.r, rne owner rs also proposlngl to Iandscape tremainder of the parking lot which is owned by Vail
-9-
That the granting of the variance will- not be detrirnentar totf'e pubric hearth' safety or welfare, or materialry injuriousto properties or inprovelnents in'the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or rnore of thefollowing reasons:
The strict or literat i-nterpretation or enforcement of!!r9 specified regulation wouta result in practicaldifficultly or unnecessary physicaf narashipinconsistent with the obj3cliies or this [i[r".
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances orconditions applicabl_e to the same site of the variance' that do not lppfy generally to other properties in thesame zone.
The strict interpretation or enforcement of thespecified regulation would. deprive the applicant ofprivileges enjoyed by the ownErs of othei-properties inthe same district.
VI . STAFF RECOMIiIENDATION
eVillagePlan
rnust
rf the Ptanning cornmission approves this reguest, staff woutdrecornmend the approvar incrude the fo1l0winj "onditi.orr=,r-- The christiania parking 10t be paved and landscaped. Theproposal wourd arso i-ncrude landsclping the western-portionof the lot owned by Vail Associates.
2' The owner would comprete the ped.estrian path between theexisting bike path and Mill creei, court guiidfig. this path!,/ould also inctude a small seating area.
e existing teria for variance
decision rnaking and useor trreseof the project.
-l,u-
3. The existing trash room on the northwest corner of thesite would be enclosed and screened by landscaping.
4. One of the new accommodation units will be restricted asshort term rental units perrnanently and wi}l not be taken outof the short term rental program at any tirne. Therestriction will- continue to apply even if the project is
condoniniurnized or the ownership changes. This conditionshall be written in a 1egal staternent subnitted to staff bythe ovmer before a building permit will be issued.
- 11-
APPLICABLE VAIL VTLLAGE PI.AN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goal #Ii Encourage high guality redevelopment whilepreserving the unique architectural scale of the vitlage inorder to sustain Vailrs sense of cornmunity and identitf.
Obiective #z: provide incentives for the upgrading andredevelopment of residentiar and commercial-tacitities.
Policy: Allow increased levels of development asidentified by the Action plan orconsistent with the Vail Village MasterPIan.
Goal #2: Foster a.strong tourist indust,ry and to promoteyear-around economic health and viability for trre irittage andfor the cornmunity as a whole.
objective #3: Increase thethroughout the Village areaovernight accommodations.
Policy: The development of accornmodation units arestrongly encouraged. Any residential units thatare developed above existing density levels shallbe designed or managed in a manner that makes themavailable for short-term rental .
ob-iectiye #5: Encourage the continued. upgrading andrenovation of existing lodging and coruneiiial ficilitiesto better serve the needs of our guests.
oFiective #6: rdentify and inplement irnprovementsthroughout the village to ernbellish the ltrysica:. designfeatures and pedesstrian amenities ot puific spaces.
Goal #3: Recognize as a
number of residential unitsavailable for short-term
top priority the importance ofthe walking experience throughoutmaintaining and enhancingthe Vi1lage.
obiectiye #1: physically irnprove the existingpedestrianways throughout tfre Village by landicaping andother improvements.
Pq].:igy: Require streetscape improvements in andalong pedestrianways in conjunclioin with anyinf ill development- proj ectsl
-'12-
GoaI #4: Preserve existing open space areas and expandgreenbelt opportunities.
Objective #I: Recognize and improve the open spacefound throughout the Village (landscaped buffers,plazas, parks, active recreation areas and open space)and to cognizant of the different role each plays.
9oa1 #5: fmprove the transportation system andi-nfrastructure by increasing both its capacity and efficiencythroughout the Village area.
O9jective #L: Meet the parking demand throughout theViIlage by the utilization of both public and privateparking facilities.
-13-
I
s-
*l
$
{
$
l
$
I
$
{
*
t
,rl
n
$
$
&
$
\
t
a
I
{I
s
il
1
\l
$.-..lIt-
t
$
f
t
f
T
irii:"ti1
e,-i8i
$,',{',r'
tr,t
it 4,i,l q
1{i
$' rY
*,! fr}il
I.i\# ri',l rt
t]. r$(tl i-thIt
^ rll{
$$
$t
\i
ii
L rrrl
o
o
)
I
#
ffi
$
lil
$I
-l
+
$
'o
#'
V
t
/fu r/&rean,il Pnncru€Lr
I L, l{b 7o-p.t.t-a-<-d /r-t ,!rt " 5/"' ' r,/ /' t / €r:, -.*'
{J-1,1dC^-",'-\ L -r ,. *',.,,-,oo..,r, f O.,U*;
| 7 o*)*..,. -l o 1r*., aL*"., - /
,lth'.- 1a Zazz{' f/f *iil Z1
O ,
tt.-n]
TT,-
u /./r,
5/8fr
o
.-.
-
,/'s/o
'H@4n'W,4'4
,rcZr"H / IW"T??/V' W zl**rtzYe fl -'T, ry
ry w t*+ v//) /1T ^['z* *zfL7-ffi
7f IFJ/=t'"7*'"TV f/22/ = T "'rq"n;vz.A Zo8. A/722
t aVZ/:nfZ/' py' / /Z * 'oFSt'7 = "''zo/n'f)/ * '"/ry
/-gS12
h/ f'Y . yta/--,o ././)A
d|rtrlrl s7 - ryrs "udry 5/ /'/7
'Wfl/."rre' "P fq q t/ /7,P4'Ynrns/
PresenttG viere
Diana Donovansid schulta
Peggy Osterfoss
Chuck Crist
Kathy warren
Pam Hopkins
Flanning and Environrnental Cornmission
August 14 | 1989
Minutes
Staff Present
Peter Patten
Rick Pylrnan
Mike MollicaKristan Pritz
The Planning and Environmental Comnission rneeting began atapproximately 3: 00 p.n.
Item No. 1 A request for a heiqht variance in order to place asatell-ite dish on the roof of the Lodqe at Vail, 174East Gore Creek Drive.Applicant: Lodqe at Vail
The staff was represented by Rick pylman on this item. He explainedthat the Lodge at vail was requesting a height variance in order toplace a 29 inch diameter satellite dish on the roof of the building.The proposal also included enclosing the satellite dish with four wallsthat would rnatch the siding and color of the Lodge at Vail. Rickreviewed the criteria connected with the proposal as per the staff
memo.
chris Farrington, representing the applicant, said that it was feltthat locating the satellite dish on the roof would be less noticeableand offered more security from vandalism.
sorneone from the audj-ence asked what side of the building the dishwould be placed on. chris said it would be on the side iacing theSitznark (on the north).
Chuck Crist asked why a satellite dish was necessary versus the use ofa cable. chris said that there was no type of ns461s' music that heknew of. He added that the Lodge had been using taped music but haddecided that the satellite would allow for a rnore eificient svstem thatwoul-d require less ernployee operation.
A motion was made by peggy osterfoss for approval per the stafffindings since the locaiion was thought to-be the ieast conspicuous,therefore the most favorable. Kathy warren seconded the motion.
Vote: 7-O
Item No. 2 A lequest for a setback vari,ance in order to build adeck on Lot 2, block 6, Intermounta n SubdApplicant: Stephen C. Beck
Kristan Pritz presented this itern for the staff. she explained thatthe existing building involved in this proposal encroaches 9 feet intothe 50 foot stream setback on the north side and 7.5 feet into the eastside setback, thus making an addition of a deck irnpossible without avariance. Two variances would be necessaryi one for a stream setbackand one for a side setback. Kristan went on to describe the criteriainvolved wj-th the proposal . The staff recommendation was for approvalwith the condition that the tree in the area of the proposed deck wouldnot be cut down.
Peggy said she was concerned with the side setback in relation to thepossibility of the pool being removed. A discussion took placeregarding the trees and the complaint of the adjacent property owner.
Peggy made a motion for approvaL of the variance request with theconditions that (1) the tree !/ou1d not be removed, and (2) that therewill be excavation and tree weLls installed for the trees between theproject and stream bank for the trees that show evidence of backfi11.The motion was seconded bv Chuck.
Vote! 7-O
Item No. 3 A request for a conditional_ Use permit in order tooperate a business office in the PubLic Accommodation
zone district, at the Christiana Lodqe at 356 Hanson
Ranch Road.
ffifTEa-iEJ- christiana nealtv
Mike Molli-ca presented this itern. lle explained that the intent of theproposar was to allow the christiana Lodge to open a smart businessoffice in the l-ocation of the front desk area. The office would beused as a real estate brokerage and management office. Mike reviewedthe criteria for the proposal and gave the staff recornnendation forapproval.
The applicant gave a brief description of the history of the businessand offices.
Chuck asked if there would be any change in signage. The applicantanswered that there would be one window sign on the front entrancedoors and that currently a directional sign was being used.
Peggy motioned for approval as presented in the sLaff memo. Chuck
seconded the motion.
Vote: 7-O
TO:
FROI'T:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Environmental Conmission
Cornnunity Development Department
August l-4, 1989
A request for a conditional use perrnit to operate a businessoffice at the Christiania Lodge, at 356 Hanson Ranch Road.Applicant: PauI Johnston
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE
The Christiania Lodge is located in the Public Accommodation zonedistrict. Within this zone district, professional and businessoffices are required to have a Conditional Use permit. TheChristiania Lodge is proposing a small- (72 square foot) businessoffice in the location of the original front desk area. Theproposed business office would be used as a real estate brokerageand a management office for the following properties: Christianiaat Vail, chateau Christiania Condominiums, Vi1la Valhallacondominiums, the Golden peak House, artd the..Garden of the Gods.
II. CRITERTA AND FTNDINGS
Upon review of Section
recommends approval offolloving factors:
18.60, the Conrnunity Development Departnentthe conditional use pernit based upon the
rr The
meet the intent of this in the Christiania Lodge willsection of the zoning code.
A. Consideration of Factofs.
t.Relationshi and ct e use on develobiectives of e Town.
dens
proposed business office
Tbe pu-pose section of the Pub.lic Accommodation zonedist-ict (sectT6-n rl:zz.oLo of thffing
Code) states that trThe public accommodation zonedistrict is intended t6 provide sites for l_qdges_andresiqenJial acconmodations for visitors, toqether w-i_Lh'
susL _pubfis_elaf_semiE@Iic facilities and linited
p ro f e s s i ona I o f f i c e s,--. .
_--.
a na iel at eE-iIilITo r --o r i e n t eduses as may appropriately be located in the samedistrict.rr It goes on to state that trAdditional
nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional useswhich enhance the nature of Vail as a winter and summerrecreation and vacation community, and where permittedare intended to function cornpatiblv with the hi<rh-
of the use on liohttranrtation facks and recreat
tr distributionutilities
2. The
ation
ties needs.
on fa
ties es, and other
of
3.
The proposed business office vill have no significanteffect on any of the above considerations.
The effect upon traffic with particular reference tocongestion, autornotive and pedestrian safetv and
The staff can find no significant effect on any of the
above considerations. There are no additional parking
spaces required as a result of this proposed businessoffice; the breakdown is as follows:
convenience, traffic flow and control . access
maneuverabil and renoval of snow from the street andparKLng areas.
Existing parking requirement
Proposed parkins r"*tr;l;li 35.39 spaces0.288 spaces
35.678 spaces
The Town of VaiI currently recognizes the Christiania
Lodge as having 36 parking spaces, hence the reason fornot reguiring additional spaces for this proposed use.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which theproposed use is to be located includinq the scale andbulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding
uses.
The proposed use will involve no changes to the existingbuilding, either interior or exterior and it should haveno effect upon the character of the area.
IIf. Such other factors and criteria as the cornrnission deems applicableto the proposed use.
rV. FTNDINGS
The Conmunity Developnent Department recomnends that theconditional use pennit be approved based on the followingfindings:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord with thepurposes of this ordinance and the purposes of the districtin which the site is located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditionsunder which it would be operated or maintained would not bedetrinental to the public heal-th, safety, or welfare ormaterially injurious to properties or irnprovements in thevicinity.
That the proposed use would conply with each of theapplicable provisions of this ordinance.
.V. SEAFF RECOI'TIIENDATION
The Cornmunity Development Department finds that this request meetsthe ConditLonal Use Pennit criteria, as stated above, and thestaff recommendat,ion is for approval .
fla'!,to* (W - Aff--<
?n! * Cl,v,K
I/a{. : 11- o
Project Application
Pro.ject Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone /,0" i f.oin,.,du*
",!'/{o - -tl.< l
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
zon. 7A
Design Review Board
Dale
Molion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Su m mary:
/"L:./* l"lr{{:
Date:
Staff Approval
6t rt oe /*;(
Fee Paid At-'' {
SIGiI APPLICiTTO;I
llame of Project
Nane of Person Subrnitting
Locetion of Project
Description of Pro:ect
The.fo'llorving infornai'icn is requirad for subnitta'l by the applic;nt
to the Des'i gi Re'rierv EoarC befcre a final apprcval can be givel-
S'i En subni tia l f ee i s 520 .00.
A. Sisn l,tateri.r 6ob\ p\a-sil
T\
I
\
a
C. Si:e of Sign
J-O. :
' APP I i ce"'i on it'c5er
Phone
l'la<r:iniinn J.:rl
-a
-+
';*
.)i'7
:'Jl
I
D.
E.
Lengih'of
x
,\t
*r
'r
}IATE,?. IALS SU 8ii !TTED I.JiTIi AP P L I CATI OiI
1. Siie P'lan,. Drar'rings slffiict locaifon ."/
z. urdllrng5 Silu'illllg t:^su r 'vu-:':"
--,.
3. Photogr:phs sho:rir:3 Propcssc l0c3;lo:1 L/
4. Aciual sign
-
5. Colored scale ora"ltng
-
6. PhotcgraPh of s'ign
).:n
APPrcved for t)RB Subnittrl
Disapp:'oved for ORB Subniii:I
--.. \r
-
s I gn A(mr n r s -.rlro-i-T-
t adt'(-l
_--'.----_-_.<\-----.---
ristia
:atty,
lllLl
I
I
DEFHRTMtrNT EFEEMMUNITV DtrVEL@FMENT
XXXXXXX sALEs AcroN FoRM XXXXXXX
ACcouNT #
01 0000 41330 COM. DEV. APPLICAT'ION FEES
1 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS
01 0000 +2415 19BB UNIFORII BUILDING CODE
01 0000 42+15 1988 UNIFORM PLUI,{BING CODE
r 0000 +2415 T9B8 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE
01 0000 4241s 1988 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
I 0000 42415 1987 NAT]ONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
1 0000 42415 OTHER CODE BOOKS
1 0000 41548 PRTNTS (M\rLqRS)
01 0000 4?412 0x coPlES / sruores
I 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES / RE-INSPECTION
1 0000 41322 OFF HOURS INSPECIION FEE
CONTRACTORS UCENSES FEES
1 0000 41330
01 0000 41413 ,SIGN APPLICATION
ea
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN ttrat the Planning and Environmental
Cornmission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section L8.66.060 of the municipal code of the
Town of Vail on August L4, L989 at 3:00 PM in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
L. A request for a height variance in order to place a
satellite dish on the roof of the Lodge at Vail.
Applicant: Lodge at Vail
2. A reguest for a setback variance in order to construct a
deck on Lot 2G, Intennountain Subdivision.
Applicant: Stephen C. Beck
3. A request for a Conditional Use pernit in order to operate
a business office in the Public Accomodation zone district,
at the Christiana Lodge, at 356 Hanson Ranch Road.
Applicant: Christiana Realty
4. Consideration of the Vail Villaqe Master Plan for adoption.
This will be a recommendation to the Town Council .
The applications and information about the proposals are
available in the zoning administrator's office during office
hours for public inspection.
TOWN OA VAIL
COMMT'NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on July 28, 1989.
t
CA/..t4;"-r R'-i4
0fr.:"1 : ?z + (*f tr e,/ *\
E4,;t-. 3.. "'1, 4
Date of
Date of
Appl ication
PEC l.leeti n
I. Thi s
use.
The
A.
B.
(itu, , fu S//g: pHoNE qT6:s6U.
77)r
APPLTCANT'S REPRESENTATNE r*LU/. fr-. ir/fo'T?tu
e-\
otlNER(S) I 'SIGNATURE(s
ADDRESS 3.;6
HoNE_{/6.J:4g
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:LEGAL- lOr_L ar0cL_z_FrLrNG ,T
NAME OF
ADDRESS
D.
f't
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT
procedure'is required for any project required to obtain a conditjonalpermi t.
application wil'l not be accepted until all information is submitted.
/ /,7
NAI4E 0F Appucnw LllKlbTtNtH {EruIv,jiL
ADDRESI 3# 44$ri RApatt ?,/ -
ADDRESS
E. iEE $]oo perc a,/a14 cK #atzL_
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE DEPARTI4ENT
ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. A list of the names of owners of all property. INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS:
THE APPLICANT I,IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECi
II. PRE-APPLICATION CLAUSE
A PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTEDT0 DETERMINE IF ANY ADDITI0NAL INFORMATI0N rs ruiEoeo. N0 AppLIcATror,r wirr-: BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT Is C0MPLETE (MUsT ilrci[oe-All-irEr'rs nEQurnEo-gy iHE zoNrNeADMINISTRATOR)._^It-rs THEAPPLTCAN!:s nrieor,rireriii io unrE An nppoir.rrNEilr$IITH THE srAFF T0 FIND ouT ABour ADDrTronnl iusmirrni nEquinEMENTS:- ""-"
PLEASE N0TE THAT A !94+IIq APPLICATI0N IiILL STREAT1LINE THE APPRoVAL pRocESS
FOR Y0uR PR0JEcr sv-oEeREEstNG THE NUTIBER oF coruorrioNs 0F AppRovAL THAT THEPEc MY STIPULATE. ALL c0N0ITIoNS 0F nFFnovel MUsr-BE coMpliED wriH'siione eBUiLDING PERHIT IS ISSUED.
adj.acent to the subject property
and their mail ing addresses.
OWNERS AND CORRECT ADDRESSES.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPM
)ve r
l/e,7tAu:1t'%, fJ:"/n ^'ffi ?n*:"a,,2 {7
ttr{la ba-t/ lrr/A (;r1, ;"L e,:z
% .es6, M+,+*t, lau/." P.{, f,,4o , b tasl
U4,/ ,lryouo/"e , no 6.x7l/a,, U. Flasry
//tv t-r.t -L h'lif-Ie.o/.'tr iqi"l 2. $rzr7aalso7', ,&rr:*o. e6lza
Q ru,to't' /i^ 1", /3qd 6.ksrl*rz frvrc-' ait* Eo,'-lr,i l, & f/as7
.-{-I L4 .-
ff[, Sour-t4J copies of the following information:
A. A description of the precise nature of the proposed
use and its operating characteristics, and rneasures
proposed to make the use conpatible with other
properties in the vicinitY.
B. A description of how your request complies with
Vail's Comprehensive P1an.
c. A site plan showing proposed development of the site,
inctuding topographyl ruifaing locations, parking,
-traffic iircufati.on, useable open space, landscaped
areas and utilities and drainage features.
D. Preliminary building plans and elevations sufficient
to indicate the dimensions' general appearance'
scale, and interior plan of all buildings.
ll
A.C/lK$rt ftpr4, Zt/c, ale
ll//a t/a/ia/b
t'/z f",an,
/oncz{zl . 7r,,kn/ F--sb/*
fuqsrrw)r+
tmtfua*f- w4""'
HP*'rk BlL
///tltas ffo- 4tata-77.:-
/Lrishatt,a nr' ha, /C+aTtuzt f/rrr-*t;,, /av"/a " ,
lJ"
/'l
ta-
*,1 /4r/ d5 a M '
(p,/r,4,vto / /-* E,ru,zrar6 /LAI. /uattol -
-1
D p/4
C)O
oz
E
=t
IJJ
o-
tLuIF
..\l
F{l
I
I
ol
NIlJrdr
F{ lJ(J,<
l(J
HIE
tr loH,Zt5
I
I
Il!!
rklo
I
I
I
I
lo.
IYtk
IFtaz
t=
t2
I l,lj
<F2.1g.=
u)<
lt
Jlrlo
=I
E
IL
o
o
EFzoo
=>E
3ut
ztr^
trYu>o
=>.6>.
t! <(o*
;-(J>()FO
=-z[('o oc?6 z'n5 oiloFo
=CJ3d
uJo{J
ax
uJ llzY
zl
.. >lo
|lJ
t!
IuzoF
(r
llJ(L
J
z
Eoo
I
I
I
I
I$l.(rl
ql
.t rl
!l
=tr
r-l
t{
]J
.-{
'rl.lJo.Fl
tr
(J
u;
=z
lo
_-t
,+
I
rl
o
Eo
:l
EI*l
trlol
s?lclal
;lr.t Ilt4
Lr{4oqg
=
I
"lolrJlutlcl
6l-l
--r I
$l
"l
ui
=4
El
JI
al>l
L!l
zl3lolFl
tltllltlttJI..J Ilol<) zl3dl;-.{ uJl
,l-',ld<l-{ >l
loltzl
=31qoltrt Fl
uJl
1l
al>l
6l
zl
EIolFI
I
I
Iol
=.1oluIl
1l
<l>l
tr.lol
pl I
oF
z
J
EF
tll
J
EgP
=<2ft
=F
^'6
t-"-(J
z
z
r
c)
UJ
=\,,/ z
co
co
I
@
I
UJF
(t,
dlo-zo
t-IL
uJY
ulo
F
F
t!
u-o
o-oo
I
UJ
t-oz
u.lF
o
z
zeslo>z
aL r.L
J."i6
=81
-'1 /\ !
=ulXdd=
F
tu
TL
-iEZE<
6U)
EC'B9fir
'=E
=o-F-rr-=u:-E h=rr dilE >(L., (Ju_E ooE 5st x>GHFOYo-i!E
ul(Il
F
I-E
E
=E,
lrJo-zo
FofEFazo(.!
nt]f
nEn
LJq,
tt,
E
o
lotFlot<
tFlzto
lolctIurtz
l=
,.E
..,3Eo
<E
3oY2qr<
I
&i
XX
.9
;ic}
\r gr
do,
tt-o(u
-.ld.uf&5('r
f!r.a tli
D l=..
Eor,!
-*.?-:oi3-v()
' rg .,;
'o
!91r: (a
GT
oo
ol
:
trl
o
=-f
oq)
i
;
!
ar(a:?
a:e
JcJq;
r35,co
:ai_
:o>ict>5
,'o
-ill
'! n'.- :'r3.= t
-2.5 io.N (
:FC
-_.L-Y0.--.
=- orO -T!dcrE
=.Fc,
= -E.oo
: o al
: .J C:I
:==
: =o
''.ho
El=-.:tt
!-\ q)
o9
t^B
oO35cro
':gr
-r(() -:: ..qr(a:
^:!(Jr!?
E3E
c) Y{,t-5;
.! trD
- t5Y:f5;.n
;3.:. >:
: O.N
: v l:
:l-
'C:r
o -.t
EEs
':.Jc
i =:
=.hO
3EJ.:B
=->Eoo
f,c(lJ'cDoO:,3 5:'c. o
:o'= q,
.9 -'_;
F-:
:crcs
o.i
= rot
o.9 :
:5;
:9-
9::
ocJ a
o'! 6
i.1 "
Jv=
r aJ-
,- =
a'l)6:.
!.='
3 s:o >.'
X O'r
-^li:- (
;:;
(J (i-!
3
E
q)
c)
lsllcrI c.,lElclo
F!f E'qLlo
Fc
ItH 5rtt -1n qlb <:E.ll'-(H =.i -.:5 t;t =:I *c
li;
| -=I (l4I o-==o-(!l!
ttt --
.rJ
c)cJ
cJC
-4.
=acl cr:i's:
E3;
9: ("x(>-; /
c)tre;oc
-aJ(:
anltFoz
o
J
o
4
zz.
l
I
I
''l
I
t9l<
I tt)
l=
I r.r
=t9
t_
t?to
I
l"l
lnQ-\,
rl
\s
-,,( I
.)u,ttfLt-
lLl
an
Ll-,
lt,
l-
r,Ll'
J
F
:l
;
(,
3
E(J
(J
=
()
ul
l)
q.
!l
x
UJ
<h
I4'
=z
z
tr
o
_E
(.)(J
.D
olz=
-lF--gl(J3i
zl
.. >lcl-
l,ruz
I
=>G
=."-= rl .A
e=Eg$ g
sE o
!3('8g.3furfo- (J>()FO
-,i '\i
u:)F
IIJ
J
zo
oC- tr>o
tu,lc-l>-l-titlt.- |iz"ol
qt
tDl
I
3
i
ll^
tl -||=
l|<llqtru,
Ilc<
il^[-l
llJ,r<l
OI
lolro
l'll
t:il
lo tl:ll
r!FltJtl<tl
X
3
Fg
o'
lrl
2t
E
J
<lolrl<tJ
6l=Ylo
'lt-
,.. UJ Ol- .J -F
HE).!JE( roqo EH=:."R I
=< cJ
-J U- r,H- 9,,--c1o. .'s lO c rllg-(^ LloH=lHosl
l4J 'g Cr IuJ c -l.=orlLJ EI3=31- P..-l
=F c.l
I3 L taiO or +Jl_J "J cJld;-ltr-revl
)-
s
ll,
UJ&-l
=E<(E
|lf(,4
-o:< u,.:E 9
€'5 a
i tJ O;_-F't- e:. .9
=:-:q:=>
E= Ioaau
=5+lrx
=-(')c.-F
5:j
-!Ji
-u,-€
*F.r
r,J
FH c!
\lf.
\0
C^
UJ
tr
@
o-)
zo
Fa-u,
utqt
o.F
ts
ul
-. o-
lL'o
o-oo
II
u,Foz
F
E
lrt'q
2ot-
C)f
(nzo
C)
fr
od1ll
a
E
X
z,"o
=<1302z
:J .o
J:x
YY=
6=5
c3ulE
r1-n
-r_-li-J
-
lt
il
fl
li
tlaql
#llrri\r, ll
,"'llJil!rliFl
IlIItl
I
I
6I
1
I
I
=jal
I
I
I
I
J
r.{
ct
:
ffi
Hq1
q.
I
fI
f,
_/f -
fl,\llJl
>l!Ftl6[
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IF
:
J
i
UJ
=
o
z
J
t1-
ri
IJ
HI
]>l
.,.Iol
zlil
z
o
au
:1
?l>l
r^lI;i3l
-l
*
lr
IIl
-x-
tl
Xo- ll
==E
ilr
-(f l,i;aF ll FYz ll o
=P tl\J ll
=c)=<
(J
ot-
C)
F
tJJ
lr- ll cII CJ II JOIUJ Il <F! F ll Ec)li ; ll r.! <I o [ *=lE t 6=lll u
-rtrt
75 south fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 479-2L.38 or 479-2139 oltlce ot community developmenl
TO:
I'ROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH TH8
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL puBl,rc woRKs/coMMUNlTy DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16, l_988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERTAL STORAGE
rn sumrnary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for anyperson to litter, track or deposit any soi-l, rock, sand, debrisor material, incruding trash durnpster-s, poriabre toilets andworkmen vehicles |pon any street, sidewaik, alley or public
e1?:" or any portion theieof" The righr-"i-*iy'in atl Town ofvar-r streets and.fgags is approxinateJ-y 5 f:t" off pavement,This ordinance wir-r be striilry enforcld by the Town of vailPyPli-c works DeparLment- pers6ns found vih.atirrq this ordinancewrrr be grven a 24 hour written notice to remove-sa.id material .rn the event the person so notified does not comply with thenotice within the 24 hour tirne specified, the il;ii" worksDepartment wilr remove said mat,eriat at ihe expense oe personnotified_. The provisions of this ord.inance sfrlff not beappricable to construction, maintenance or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the right-a_way"
To review ordinance No. o in furl, prease stop by the Town ofVail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for yourcooperation on this natter.
Read and acknowledged by:
t
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
TUES WED THUR
PERMIT NUM OF PROJECT
=-\\-,N\ JOB
CALLER
INSPECTION:MON a;>-\qt/
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H UB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
r-l
tr FINAL D FINAL
fLEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr_tr
fu^'tr FINAL
PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
Iuwn
75 south ,ronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
to, '5- +\q-*rlrft
FAX pHoNE 110.,
t{o.{-€? D - €5oB
$A"-,/)lr61s1a.g (Ai1kFROM:
DATE:V'. ao (n
l,l0. 0F PAGES IN D0CUMENI (NOT iNCLUDING COVER SHEET):
RESPONSE REQUIRE0?: NO
.T
lirl'1r
75 south trontage road
vail. colorsdo 81657
(303) 476-7000 ottlce ot communlly developmenl
August 29, 1988
Mr. Jin Hanna
Culpepper, McAuJ-isse, and Meaders
400 Colony SquareSuite L717Atlanta, Georgia 30361-
Reference: Christiania Parking Lot, View Corridor
Dear Jim,
Enclosed is the inforrnation relating to the view corridorfor your site. There are no specific dimensions other thanthe survey points and photo outlines for the corridor.I al-so enclosed the ordinance concerning this corridor,
ff you have any further
me at 303-476-7000 ext.
Sincerely.It I n\
{risfu^^YrFKristan Pritz
Senior Planner
guestions, please feel free to call
l_03 .
POINT
VIEW POINT iII
VIEI'I POINT ['2
VIEI{ POI}iT
VIEI{ POI){T
TMVERSE POINT
TRAVERSE POINT
r0136. 53
roi02. 26
VAIL YILL:IGE vlE; POItiT COoRf INATFS
NORTHING
r0EB5. r0
L0129 .7 2
lol89.l1
10361.6r
{i5
l!6
EASTI}:C
100i0. 70
100r8.99
I0r82.72
9669 . )?
10119.61
9319.01r
t]l
,A
oIJ
tr
IJ
rl
A
!J!O.co60tt a .r{
IA.f 0,1r!rno
,h
T
,{
b0
o
3r.l >1 {t ._l (n o'1 Gl O '{ O OkoOOOOCrF{tl1(1.1\t1a1NcO@oodco
q,.{
bt)
o
r-l
+)a-O -l (7't \t O\ d\N C') ln ClOO'noooooLr .tt \O O d) r?t
-qoO'.<-{Ft:l e.l c.t c\t c{ N
.lJ
i{o
trr
3
.r{
rn+ (u*uoutr.oC ..{ nl.rl oOOr !P{dri {UBd E(uo5riOlr>tt !,
at,llc .Flutr l, t11
0, -c o
t 'Fl r.ll-. O..cuJ ooo o ..{tr$ ol-{ Fq !t
rn
F{zH
C)
3
li
"%iru'oo
AN ORDINANCE AIIENDING T1ID VAIL VILLACE URBAN
DESIGN GUIDE PLAN - DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
VIE1V SI|CTION I';N VIUlY CORF'TI\''N \I..\P TO RIi!)I;CE
TIIB liU:':iil:R Ci: :'l.iJOil Vl'"it C')l':liDOtls '{ND'i'r')
ELIIIIII{ATEIIINoRvIEIvcoRRIDoRS;ANDSETTING
FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERSTO '
WHEREAS, the revision to the view section of the Urban Design
Guj.de Plan - Design Considerations and the Vierv Corridor l'{ap has been
under study by staff, Pla.nning and Environinental Commission and Town
Councll for a consid-erable time perioti; and
WHEREAS, it is the opini.on of the Town Counci] that preservation
of certain existing view corridors is essential to the character of
Vail as a mountain resort; and
-
IYHEREAS, the preservation of such views lvi11 .protect the
municipalities attraction to tourists and visitors and, therefore'
enhance and protest its economic vitality '
WHEREAS, it is the opinion of Council that the several most
importantvi.ewcorridorsbeentlrelypreservedastheyexist;and
\TIIEREAS,thePlanningandEnvironmenta}Commissionhasrecoul-.
mendedadoptionofthenineviewcorridors'onefocalpointand
a-menciments to the language in the view section to the Council'
NoIY,THEBET,oRE,BEIToRDAINEDBY.THETo\vNcoUNcILoF.THEToITN
OT'VAIL:
Section 1
Section G. Views of the Vail Village Design Considerations is
herebY amended to read as follows:
G. VIE\YS AND FOCAL POINTS
vai t? s mountain/valrey sett ing . is a .ry9ll3il"1-lii:-?: 1::
i { ' llli.itil""vi;;!";i-;i'"-;;unii:'n=1 :Ii-:1?l"i:..??l}3:}: ::3t"i:"'*, " :t::" ;::' ."ilili."i"'ii"aii""itli: y:l:ii;^:?:l:"'"':::"i?*'.:{
:.';ii4:, ili;.ti; ii=:-uiiitv, o"i"niu;l:l i:l:':i::,,:::"tl;-"::;l?:l b":i:i:"t
' r','iPj],;it, i:l;t;:: H:';i:;'."dp;;i;;i-.r'u'".t.' reatures, orientation rerer-
.,,'1fi,,ii,.! :,
"r."r and visual f ocal points.
::jiit-';The most sisnificant and obvious view corridS,I:,h.iY?,1::n',1:::*Ri::3
. ".,ii..:.t,i;l1ffii-#{:: ifl"rilE-ir-J"U;;iil; y;; i",-"i"'utt qr the vail villase urban Design
..'.ittlE#:r1;.Framew.'r.-pr'"J-;;* tl:::;llfl:::ll{.u'"*:,::::i (l*:t3?":'"1}}?ull.'.f':#.H.:it ;lJ^i;.;k plan) ano pnotog".prti""rrv.documented (photos on f ile in
':':il;i:g=-S-i.i. t;i;*;;;"nity Deveropmeni"Dep"rtteni). However, the view corridor
'.' .:.:-: :.? 'r1ki -.1'.!^+^,r an 1-ra6 ma,.ta en.t in ti.re ohotograDhs should not be consider..ii'.:ffi-tlr';;:*EH;"nity Deverobteni-oe-p""tt"nll . However, the view cotridors
ir:::i{.'''.:li;l :. depicted on 1,he maps and in tire photographs should not be considere| , iliiliii-.l" "ir'!-*ip"'"'l- il -!t:-t!:::*::t1: ?::::i"::'',1:,":ol:idered
proposal , first
't
I
't trJ
-2-
The offi-cial photographs and field surveys of the vierv corridors
and focal point contain the area'lo-uu protected.' No encroachment
wlll be allowed above tbe top ot ifre-uflck and white line on the
photographs or in the protecied *t"" u" depicted by the fierd
surveys. The field surveys ut" "n-iiiE wiitr -the Department of
Community Deveropment and will uJ u""o-to aid.staff and applicants
in determining the specific Atmeisiliif-t"=trictions produced by r.
the vlew corridors. Minor moairications to the roofs or structures
(i.e. a new flue) located above i;;-ii;;.tul-!: permitted if appro; '
priate approvals from the Communily oev"ropment Departrnent are 1, .
obt ained.
To demonstrate the impact on other views, all submittals should
include a visual impact anarys:-sl i;i;-analysis could be in the
form of sketches, photographic overlays, photographlc touch-Yl?:-
mocrels, or other'simulailon techniqt.L.' A means of demonstratlng
in the field (on site) the impaci-Jt-"i"*s wiff also be required
by the zoning administrator.
As circumstances affecting views change, Such as rezonings, variances
in helght or new buildings, the vi-ew |orridors will be revierved and'
if necessary, revised. If a conflict exists betrveen the maximum
' treight allowed and the view corridors, -the more restrictlve regulation
The following j-s a listing anO veiUai'description of the adopted will
view corridors and foca.l point: apply
$v.DESCRIPTION
point in this vierv.
1 This view occurs from two flights of steps above the photographic
point on the south side of tUE VaiL Tranlporta-tion Ceuter. The
view is slgnifj.cant in that ii contains the clock To*er and the
Rucksack to*J.-."--io"uf foints,-but also is one's first view of
the ski slopes as one comes oui of the Transportation center.
2 This is a significant view beca.use it allows one to see the ski
slopes trom ipper Bridge street as well as directing one to the
tic-ket and lift facilities in the Vi1la'se
SThisisaviewoftheGoreRange.fromHansonRanchRoadjusteast of tn.'iliri-c""!r.-e.ioge ina west of the Mj'll' Creek Court 81
6 This is probably the best known and most spectacular view in
the villae"-;"*'u. It is looking east t-o.the Gore Range f rom
Gore creek D;i;;'beiween The Lolge a.t vail_retail shops and
the Gore Creek Pi.'azr- Building' ihe Clock Tower is a focal
Section 2
Section 3
The Town Council herebY
this ordinance is necessarY
welfare of the Town of Vail
I
-3-
finds, determines
a.nd proper for the
and the inhabitants
and declares that
health, safety and
thereof
a
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be inva.tid, such.decision
shaLl not effect the validiiy of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Torvn Countit f,"t.UV declar6s-it would have passed
this ord.inance, and each part, """tiot, subsection, sente,n:::^"11::"
or phrase thereofl-regardiess of the fa.ct that any one or more pa.rrs'
sectlons, subsections, sentences '
-clauses or phrases be declared
inval i d.
The repea-t or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of
the Vail Municlpal Code al provided in thj.s ordlnance sha11 not
affect any right whlch has accrued, any duty imposed, &trY violation
ihat occuired-prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution
connnenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or
by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed or reenacted. The
rLpeal of any proiislon hereby shall not revive any provision or.any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated
herein.
)
regular meeting of the
The lrlunisipal Building
Town Council
of the Torvn.
of th
ATTEST:
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
th]..s 4/-a/day of , 1983.
ATTEST:
')^Jillu,lJJ I .{i,Jrud-;,It)J,.f,"+ t t'
PameLa A. Branqmeyer, 'rolvn UrerK
Sect i.on 4
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST BEADING, APPBOVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE IN FULL,trris {t/A public hearlng
, 1983, at thesha1l be held hereon on the A/re1 da-y of
Vail, Colorado, in
day or &r":/ , 1eB3'
, Town
i f or
'{-+
s
STN{
qs\
R$x$sd \
i${ H
tsi*i
N
$$$$ *
Project Application
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
&&/,lt il,
enon" ".io / oi 'P-( tft .:t"- v
Architecr, Address and phone: --\\ , i ,^
'
4-'' d- . n
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
Filing
Design Review Board
APPROVAL
?ll
DISAPPROVAL
Town PlannerL-oo", 8/ 3rr/f )/
E Statt Approval
APPLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DRB MEETII{G:
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION l^tILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBI4ITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application meetjng with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
determjne if any additjonal information is needed. No application wjll be accepted
unless it is complete (must jnclude al'l items required by the zoning administrator).It is the applicant's responsi'bility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additional submittal requ'irements. Please note that a COMPLETE appl ica-
tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is issued.
A. pR0JECT DESCRIPTION:. ..1,,c r2.,r,_,r_76 fcr:., F=/-<:7.,t;:i.z:lE -
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address .l.t C /-.t,t,j/-tS/;*r' A//.).,/,/a,/t /2(.ttz t
Legal Descript'i on Lot D Bl ock Filing l'>l
Zon i ng
C. NAME OF APPLICANT: /Ytt.',:,
Address ,:i..it; 1,/A,r't'6+r Zttz*rl+ L|Z.t .t tel ephone ;47** 5e z1.i
' /; '*tt /Et_,.4. ' .,t' >D. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:
Address '/1c, - ltt'y' ).L 6 UA.lL *c telephone '/r'? -lsA\
E. NAME OF OWNERS:
Si gna ture
Address /, j L a*z,r+-A-,.rL C'dLt tel ephone j/?"/ ./-;2 T
F. DRB FEE: The fee will be paid at the time a building permit'is requested.
VALUATION FEE
$ 0-$ 10,000$10,00i-$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ ,500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ 0ver $1,000,000
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$ 50.00
$1oo. oo
$200.00
$300 .00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the app'l icant must
to indjcate property lines and building corners. Trees that will
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB
si te.
stake the site
be removedvisits the
2. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetingsof the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. People who fail to appear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ i shed.
*^ -^ r^-^^- r.r.,n *zr ha nv.acon+ad +n fhc nccion Rpview Boafd,4. The following items no longer have to be presented-to.the Design^Review Boar'
iii"V,-no*"u.i, ftiu" to be firesented to thb Zoning Administrator for approval:
a. lljindows, skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing plane of the build'ing; and
b. Building additions that are not vjewed frory qny other lot o" p!b]i9.-:13:.'
which hive had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approvlng
the addjtionJ-anOloi ippiovaf from the agent f6r', or manager of a condorninium
associ at ion .
5. You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You should
check with a Town Planner before proceeding.
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
I. NEl,l CONSTRUCTION
A. Topographic map and site plan of site containing the following (2 copies):
1. Licensed surveyof's stamp.
2. Contour intervals of not more than 2' unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or
more, in which case, 5' contour jntervals will be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more
one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders,
i ntermi ttent streams , etc . ) .
5. Avalanche areas, 100 year f1 ood p1a'i n and slopes 40% or more, if app'l icable.
6. Ties to existing benchmark, ejther USGS landmark or sewer invert.
7. Locations of the following:
a, Proposed surface drainage on and off site showing size and type of
cul verts, swal es, etc.
b. Exact locatjons of all utjlities to include existing sources and proposed
serv'ice lines from sources to the structure. Utilit'i es to include:
cabl e TV sewer gas
Tei ephone water el ectri c
c. Property lines showing d'i stances and bearings and a basis of bearing
d. Proposed driveways with percent slope and spot elevations
e. All easements
8. Existing and fjnished grades.
9. All existing and proposed improvements includ'i ng structures, landscaped areas,
service areas, storage areas, walks, driveways, off-street parking, loading
areas, retaining wa11s (with spot e1 evations), and other site improvements.
10. Elevations of top of roof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath) to
determine he'ight of building.
B. A statement from each utility verifying location of service and avajlability. To
be submitted with site p1an.
C. Preliminary title report to accompany a1l submjttals, to insure property ownership
and all easements on property.
D. Landscape Plan (I" = 20' or 'larger) - 2 copies
1. Show the location of 4" diameter or,larger'treeS, .other shraubs,-aRd-iiative plants thaare on the site and the location and design of proposed landscape areas with
the varieties and approximate sizes of plant materials to be planted. i'
2. Complete landscape materials I ist.
3. Designate trees to be saved and those to be lost.
N0TE: As much of the above information as possible should occur on the site plan, so that
the inter-relation of the varjous components is clear. The landscape plan should be
separate. The exjsting topographic and vegetational characteristics may be a separate
map. The applicant must stake the sjte to show lot lines and building corners. Trees
that will be lost during constructjon must be tagged. The work should be completed
before the DRB site visit.
aE. Architectural Plans (1/8" = 1' or larger) 2 copies
. 1. Must include floor plans and all elevations as they will appear on completion. ' ..
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades
Z. Exterior surfacing materials and colors shali be specified and submjtted for
review on the materials list available from the Department of Community Develop-
ment. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented at the Design Review
Board meeting.
F. The Zoning Administrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional plans,
drawings, specifications, samples and bther material (including a mq4e]) if deemed
necessary to determine whether a project will comply with design guidelines'
II. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photos or sketches that clearly indicate what is proposed and the location (site plan)
of proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requ'irement: Sjvq! above, as
1on! as they piovide all important specifications for the proposed'i ncluding colors and
materials to be used.
III. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A, Original floor plans w'ith al1 specifications shown
B. Floor plan for addition - 2 cop'ies
C. Site plan showing existing and proposed construction - 2 cop'ies topos
D- Elevations of addition
E. Photos of existing structure
F. Specifications for alI materjals and color samp'l es on materials list available at
Department of Cornmunity Development
At the request of the Des'ign Review Administrator you may also be required to submit:
G, Statement from each utility veri fy'i ng location of service and availabiiity' See
attached utjljty location verification form.
H. Site improvement survey, stamped by registered professional surveyor.
I. Preliminary title report, verifying ownership of property and lists of easements.
IV. FINAL SITE PLAN
After a bu'i ]d'i ng permit has been issued, and when the project is underway, the following
will be requirei before any building receives a framjng inspection from the Building
Department: A certifjed 'improvement survey showing:
A. Building locations with ties to property corners, i.e. distances and angles.
B. Building djmensions to nearest tenth of foot.
C. All utility service lines as-builts show'ing size of lines, type of material used,
and exact locations. 2 copies
D. Drainage as-bu'ilts. 2 copies
E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
F. All property pins are to be either found or set and stated on map'
G. Ail easements
H. Building floor elevations and roof ridge el evations.
NAI4E OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P
The following
Board before
A. BUILDING
l,
LIST OF MATERIALS
a-tgtl-
t hx;ft-l/ E.rl_>/- 'r<+ (:>
I l1T BLOCK FILING
information is requ'i red for submjttal by the applicant to the Design Review
a final approval can be fiven:
MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERiAL COLOR
Roof
Si di ng
Other Wall Materials
Fasci a
)oTr r rs
Wi ndows
l'lindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
pnone:
PLANT IIiIATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botani'ca I Name
EX]STING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
Common Name Quani ty Si ze*
for con'i f ers .
( over )
*Indicate caliper for deciduc'ious trees.Indicate height
"PLANT ITIATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Nq!1e Quanity Size
(con't)
SHRUBS
EXISTiNG SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
Type Square Footage
GROUND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. oTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wal1s, fences, swimm'ing poo1s, etc.) Please specify.
UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVI SION
JOB NAME
t0T BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The location of utilities, whether they be nain trunk lines or proposedlines, nust be approved and verified by the following utilities for the
accompanying site p1an.
Authorized Signature Date
Mountai n Bel I
I -634-3778
l,lestern Slope Gas
Harry Moyes
Public Service Company
Gary Hal l
* Hoiy Cross Electric Assoc.
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Vail Cable T.V.
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Vaiiey Water
and Sanitation D'i scrict
Davi d Krenek
NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his
responsibility to obtain a street cut permit fron the
Town of Vai1, Departrnent of Public Works and to obtain
utility locations before diggi.ng in any public right-
of-way or easenent in the Torm of Vail. A building pernit
is not a stTeet cut perrnit. A street cut pernit must be
obtained separately.
This form is to verify service availablity and location.
This should be used in conjunction with preparing your
utility p1.an and scheduling installations.
* For new const
pl ease fj l l out
attached sheet.
TnNtr auEav
FND, SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
DATE:
LEGAL DESXRTMMN:TOL Bl ock F'if ing
ADDRESS:
Ot,,NER
ARCHITECT
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Al I owed
(30)(33)
Phone
Phone
Proposed
Hei ght
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
llater Course
Site Coverage
Landscap'i ng
Fence/Retaining'ilal 1 Heights
Parki ng
Credits: Garage
Mechani cal
Ai rl ock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: Slope Permitted
Envi ronmentai /Hazards : Aval anche
20'
15'
L5'
(30 ) (50 )
(3oo)(600)
(soo)(1200)
(50)(1oo)
(2s)(so)
( 2oo ) (4oo )
Slope Actual
Flood Plain
Sl ope
Wetl ands
Geoloqic Hazards
Comments:
Zoni ng: Approved/D isapproved
Date:
Staff Siqnature
$g
n
0{
t*
ft
r$
"j
I
\q
il
:a
FI
F
st
sl, ff
fisL\r
{e-
1i
ge
sufiq
ffiH
d-
't*,f
fp,
v6fr
'$C-F ,-i*[*
,ttFs
FTL$rs
I
H
II*: *fl -"l-
"l'g
i
-*r,lE*
il-?n
${.x
Sllt
l, -\
\T
I
.x\\\
,l
oz
ts
=E
UJ4
r7)
tr]c..l (r)
U)
UJ
uJl!
F
=
UJ
@
@
Or
tsA
rrl
z
E
7
F.l
prA
llt
z
z
og
zz
l€,oo
It9 r
t"l
lgii rE<ro
HI
A.s)l
I
sr la
i' Il-#:E;< |tt
GZEfl I=('.D a4 t,"-* tz5- rX
UAcEvfulFI<F
oz
-*.,\:-
--j
i5-.JA IAt.< +
-.\
u,
ro>
6t r
F.{ I I
Jul
=T
u-
Fo
z
o
u.l
4
F-l
'Bs
EO)
sc6oroE
6.9
o \&.'; oi'6o
-oc;€
!I)i4r@)*Eo
/a'E
tN
Eg
96
e=ooP!
PF
P€oo
Eo(!0D
or .S
=1tx'=rd)
figoo
vf
=d^o)99o-
c(Et=
qi o):;.!E
c)
6
o
G
<too
6
=
c
3oF
6/
5.;
>
E
(g
oa
lt
6
'F(!
E
o
;
=3
E
(J
OJ
o)(!
3tr
g(J
q.2
>.:C-rbs
'- (tto(t'5o
-g=r,.E>c9
d.s
6H
$o
o'^-'Ey
o(s<)P6F
APEcl
oo
OOic.cg
-o-(!0
()E
:, F63E8o6
iE(go
>goodt;
EF!o
-o
rt t-c{
.if.ir .4 co N<\
tl
6N
tq
F<tft
C\
E
.it
N
t
=
IUo-
z
:
I
u.J
z
J
J
o
F
uJ
(t,
z
E
J
J
z
I
tu
=
X
N(\
rut!
z
tr
UJ
o
LU
oE
o
co
=g
uJ
z
6iu
6
uJ
fz
Itl
o
x
l-
UJol
o
UJ
UJtl-
E
=E
o-
J
FoF
z
co
fr
()ul
uJ
(5z6
=
o-
J
Iz
o
uJ
F.l
t-roH
NO[VnlVA
le
t<
It.l.n
I t-r-
IE
lflr\IB
I.:v
EH
L,
ZYotstE.irE
=H;iB6rt)
3o.
3H
.! klo4
=>|r
=oGr
zzooFo- o;B 3
ur(.57x6y*s
;-(Jtc,FO
-iGi
zH
l,-,r.
z
t
z
E
>t
zp
.l
X
:t
z
F-
lJ_
r.i
o-l
uJ
.it |lJE
D+X>+
az
E6
z
Et
uJ
J
;
UJz
I
2lz
tr !.J<oo<
=Hxrrdct<z
utFz ..
o>z-
tur O3tr
(r
uJ
J
z
Eoo
LTJ Fo-tr<>oH
uJl
J
!E
zI
az tu
z
Y
z
tr
doE
tJ)
JJ
B
F
ul
@
C\tN
!&
..!)
(:r)
rr)
fJc)
r.lJFqoo-zo
F
uJY
ulo
oFtEco
GCOtlj 01
o- F-r
11.lO .ol>-lo-.lO e-rlo erltal
*t Fj
\J2.6
z
(J9ze
coo
=z
o-- P.}{--LI!tJLI
.J
."*5
=E=dd=
F
tJl
bE8
=zE<ol€frB9Eira9'Etr
FTEIFE fr=|) # i,'iE :FE 66t hurE Xo-t x>t q-o-itril
tu
a0
F
E
-Je
F
=E
lrJ
o-zoFofEFozo(J
v
,l
F
U)
t4
Fl
F-l
F]H
Fd
Hz
H(,
H
i;
=z
'-)
\?
I
j
o-
JH
A
H
Fl
tltlIItl(,/rl I(.'t IztlF{t Ivt Ic4tlr4l I*l
Iztl
Ol u,F-! | (/)l-| uJltd
teEI J
*cl g
-if
F-(a
-iI
I
F..ir
Icalllo't I
vl-l
'lolll|t
c(l
JI
<lilol
zl
e|Fl
MH
CA
H -$
I
CA\a
O'
I
I
r.r I
dlNl
I
I
ol
z.l
(5lul
1l
<l>l
LLIol
zl
3lolFI
zH
t
Fl
Htr{
FlFl
FlH
F
t\
F
I
\'
F-F
t'\
I
-so\
zH
Epil
Ft{
Fl
Fl
F-l
H
Io. IIlc.t I.-{ |
F-{ |
I
Iol.l(rl
uJl
-r-lal>l
ttlol
zl
3l
9lFI
I
I
I
I
I
olz)
ol
uJl
.cl
EI
Pl g
F
a
vl
E
FT
t
tr
G
<F
I,IJ <zEIIJ F(rzoO
JU<o(JF
t<irlr
-zilo
z
6
==
z
-
LU
=
!/ z
r-+d-r .Xr#KJLtg
bl sl tls
tn
LIJ
tu
!-
)<
F
o
F
UJ
c)
]
UJ
z
=
(5
!f
tt)
UJ
UJr!
F
=tl,
llrl
ll
t&
r T-1rllrir!J
--+r-H
\
laaIJtq,lv)t>
t-
lo
Ir!
oFo
z
o
F
a
X>(
c.9
Rci:-{J CJ
rt a)
oq,'.o,r- aEo.9
3R
f,\e
?i\o
f-\$int")olr(Jl
rr.6..
'.R\tff\o\T-
0)
x\-
E
G.
c,''t3
o
L}
o,
.Fp
m
E
o
-E)c
ioJ: 'l]')o
iLtJob
;p
)m
iE
o
f
o
0)
F.:
=f-
-c
-v
:(E
J..
:o
tu)
v,
=E-
,'5 I
oi
(
aa0i';sg
:o|4
r-E
UO
-P
l,L
t36oEF.
>=9(!
;il_ >\t(tt- Itr ql
!clo o'l
n' J.'
'i -a
-6:-={! o--
: o-
D- c
r'. O
:oo
;= ,E
r:f
oa1'5.g
'io
>,'i
6:()-
o-
:, i'i(3: i
io'=o
iuc.9o_
:OJcr
€71
=Dl
_5:
oc(
=:-t
Yn.:
=- (
1o c]:-
!r!a
?- c
::E
a 1rr..
:Eo
r ao5
E-_9
--!
c)r
3';(J>,
al'(!:.
x o-
.Zn
Eo
r--IUt.=!6I c.)
f-ldl"IE!bFEIsH :,t -lr =ril i;
4 -:r.=:t!15,I o.!I E;I oF
i -it-c
.Y n.
(!T()-==o-o
O. -!(!E
!-:(gE;()!
cJ.o
-E-.E05a
cl c)l
*' !s :
;3
O'-r(gD r
>. -9 (-o o j
:v o(dtr!j-oc
-alc
.Nouvn'lvA
d-l
UJ
LUulz
U'
F
5
rllq
J
zo
F
6-o
ll,
2
F-
(,/)
I
I
I
hz
29oFTU<(Jo<gd:E6:oo<=
i:
!<
t$
F-:l
;olol
Ftl
dflotl
=ll
IE
i.I
^l
=lvl
.rY
.at'l
S CIil
6Yx
Cl
? r.r-9o@z5o
d
3,
.o
u,z.ul 1
=tA €\
_i tu
I
eqd5
9a
=>\rz
t', 5o-()>OFo|; a{'o
o
i.
o-
3
ltl
... UJ OF -t
.-H (a .rrE( roo<u cl,.u H rctAJF.&?Z< c.r
-J 14 (,F. F-r OtlJ- v < iE . =lu- qr !-l
14 'o IO'n I
H o.El
L.rJ E 0,J It! C -lzoc_lU EI3=31ol,(5 L q-lzts ()_l
I3 L rrriO OJ +JI
__1 e old;-lt- _t cvlItrJ I- .lr- .-r cv F
z,"ov:-
=<EZ
fP
EULJ
u-r I
=F{,!aG
EbE< lt.., J- Y
F.-- sF>< It-4: r,r o;= F-F
'E.a- g
=:! >
F=d F
:- F
=8"< -t E;di t
5=3 0€tl Hr x;3-q'lg<=e lr.l =:-ut
-(oI,9
*
i N\'
EJ
2b?
X
-tp
tAn
u,
tro
d)oazo
Fo-
lU
IU
c0
t-
=
UJ
o-zo
F
c-)f
.l-ozo
C)
t,J:<J
F-;-\ J
J. tr.
' '.t ,
.tz '
75 south lrontage road
vail, colorado B.l657
(303) 476-7000
department of public works/transporta on
T0:.
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
rn summary, ordinance No. 6 states that lt 1s unlawful for any person Eolltter, rrack or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or macerial, includingtrash dumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles upon any srreer,sidewalk, a11ey or public prace or any porEion thereof. The righE-of-wayon all rown of Val1 sEreets and roads ii approxiroately 5 fE..off pave:nent.This ordinance will be strictly enforced by che rovm Lr vail public worksDeparlmenc. Persons found violating thls ordinance will be given 24-hourr{ritten notice to remove said naterial. rn the event the person so nocifieddoes not comply with the notice within the 24_hour time specified, thePublic works Department vril1 remove sald material at che expense of personnotlfied. The provisions of this ordinance shal1 noE be applicable toconstructlon' Ear-ntenance or repair projects of any sEreet or alley or anyutilities in the rlghr-of-way.
To review Ordinance No. 5 ln fu11, please stop by the Town of vail BuildingDeparEment to obtain a copy. Thank you for your- cooperation in this matcer.
'r'. | |'t rl
VAIL1989
MEMORANDIIM
ALL CONTMCTORS CURRENTLY REGISTERED WITH THE TOI.IN OF VAIL
TOI,IN OF VAIL BUILDING DEPARTMENT
lrARcn 16, 1988
ORDINANCE NO. 6
nead and !_c|lowlgleed
- .t"
e't o
1.
Town of Vail Building Department project Requirements
and Contractor Inforrnation
Building pernit application:
A.) FiII out work sheet,.B.) Subnit two complete sets of p1ans.
* If fast-tracking project see fast-track apptication.
* No permits, including Fast-Track, will be issued without.written approval from planning department for on siterequirements.
rt All design review board, planning commission and towncouncil approvals and conditions, if applicable, betweenthe Town of Vail and the developer, shall be acquiredwith written agreenents concerning these matters beforebuilding pennits are issued.
:t condorniniuro approval for gny work in a condorniniumized.building
Architects & Engineers stamps reguired on alI plans:
* Exception: R-3 single farnily & duplex.R-1 one story structures
contractor registration gith Town of vail building department:
A.) $1 nillion liability insurance.
B. ) Workroen compensation insurance.C.) T.O.V. registration.
rr AL1 insurances rnust be kept up to date if working in theTown of Vail ,
On site project requirements i
A- ) Posting of permit in a crear weather protected cover,visibre from road or hallway if condoiriniurn or townhouse.B. ) Set of starnped approved plans must be on site forduration of project. No inspections can be done if pransare not on site. Fast-Track projects to have plans 6nsite as approved.
2.
3.
4.
5. Reguired insp.ections:
A. ) Excavation and footing rebarFoundation rebarMasonry fireplace ( structural design-& chimney liners )Underground DwV, water, gas, & eleciric )Temporary electric serviceRough plumbing ( DWV, water, gas, & hot tubs)Rough electric ( see ordinance no. L2 )Rough nechanical t g?s ,Bn vents, duct work, combustion ){ air, f ireplace fl-u masonry & type 'rA" IRoughsprink1er(hangers,1o-ation,etestini)
Rough fire alarrn
Rough frarning ( property improvement survey when req. )fnsulationFireproofing ( if required for structural components )Sheetrock screw / nail offExterior lathFinal plunbingFinal mechanicalFinal electricalFinal DRB ( _Iandscapinq, exterior finishes, paving,Final f ire departrneirt i' it ,"q,rii"a-j------Final buildinq
6. Property inprovement survey:
A. ) Reguired on all new construction.
B. ) submitted and approved before rough framing inspection.c.) rmprovement-survey to include treigrrt of ridges,'base--sLab elevations, property 1ines, ind footprint'of newconstruction. Survey must. be stanped by a licensed.engineer.
7. Fire department inspections:
A. ) Shop drawings on fire aLarrn system.B. ) Shop drawings on sprinkler systen.
'* shop drawings to be subnitted. to building department and.must be approved before work is started.
8. Street cut permits:
A.) fssued by the Town of vail public Works Department.No work may start without first obtaining i perrnit.
* Dates: Street.cuts are permitted between April 15 toNovember 15 on1v.
't.
9. Townbuilding
and L987
A.)
of Vail amendments to the l_985 editions of uniformcode, uniform plumbing code, uniform mechanical codenati.onal electric code:
ordinance no. 12 LggT I Amendments to the 1982 NationalElectric Code for the Town of Vail .
1.) A11 electrical wiring in groups A'B,E,I e Hoccupancies as defined in the Uniforrn BuildincrCode, shall be incased in conduits, racev/ays,or 1l approved armor. AII wiring in group R_lshall be encased. in conduits, riceways or inapproved armor to the circuit breaker box foreach unit No aluminum wire or copper_clad,aluminum wire smaller than size I witt fepernitted within the Town of Vail .
2.') Persons engaged in the installation of remotecontrol, low energy power and signal circuitsas defined in articl-e 7ZS and 26O of 1987 NEC,need not be licensed electricians; however, ai1such persons shall be registered wittr the stateelectrical board. proof of registration shal1be produced when asked by the Town of VaiIBuilding Official .
3.) Al1 such installations of remote control, lowenergy power and signal systems are subject tothe permiL and inspection! requj-rements ofsectlon L2-23-lL6 C.R.S.. Accordingly a1linst.allations of remote control, Iow energypolrer and signal systems must be performed.- inaccordance with the rninirnum standlrds set forthin the Nationat Electric Code.
B. ) Underground gas piping:
L.) public service co. requires al1 gas pipinginstalLed underground to be weld6A, the Town ofVail_acknowledges and supports thisregurrernent.
2.) U.p.C. reguires a 60 psi test for 30 minutes.
C.) Firep.lace chirnney chases:
f..) Afl fireplace /wood stove chases to besheetrocked with S/A" Type X gypsun board andfiretaped. Inspections are recruiiea.
.t'o
1-0. Inspection requests:
A. ) 111 inspection request shall be calledin advance by the -elqctrical contractorn. J A rel_nspection fee may be assessed forreinspection when such portion of workinspection is called is not cornplete orcalled for are not made.
1.) EJ.ectrical reinspection g44.oo2.) Building plurnbing & mechanicalreinspection 93O.00.
c. ) Electrical inspections are on Monday, wednesday & friday9n1y, 8:o0 AM to 3:30 pM. No specifii al,r or pMinspections can be granted during pealc uuiiding season.
11. special construction request for vair- virlage & Lionshead:
A. ) Approvals from the Town of Vail Cornmunity development,Po1ice, Fire and public Works departmenti is .".Iir:.r"a'before construetion is to becrin.B.) Any heavy equipment ie: cran6s, backhoes, concretepumps etc... used in the core areas must be pre approved.by the building departrnent.
12- Horiday crosures for vail Village & Lionshead core areas:
A. ) No construction work will be conducted during thefollowing holidays.
L. ) Menorial Day ( three day holiday weekend )2.) Fourth of JULY
?.1 Coors Bicycle Classic ( as scheduled )1.1 Labor lay ( three day holiday weekend )5.) Speeial Events ( proper notice will be given )
in at least 24 hr
each inspection orfor which
when corrections
13. construction working hours in for Vair village & Lionshead,core areas:
A.) Monday tbru Friday Z:OO A.M. to 7:OO p.M..B.) off season and summer core closure l-1:00 A.M. to 2:00 p.Mdaily, no vehicres are arrowed into these core areasduring these hours. rn addition no loud noises such asjackhanmering and other noisy construction activitieswill be allowed during this time.c. ) Deliveries of construction rnaterials and trash removalshall be between the hours of 72oo A.M. to 1r.:00 A,M. and2:00 P.ItI. to 7:00 P.M. .
o
14.Certificate of occupancy.
A.) Certificate may be issued when it is.found that thebuilding or structure complies with the provisionsof the U.B.C., U.M.C., U.p.C., U.F.C., & N.E.C. asadopted by The Town of Vai1.B.) No building or structure of group A,E,f,H,B, or R-Loccupancy, shall be used or occupied, and no change inthe existing occupancy classification of a building orstructure or portion thereof shall be rnade untj_l the
. buil-ding official has issued a certificate of occupancy.C.) ryo R-3 occupancy shall be used or occupied until a-finilinspection has been conducted and approved by thebuilding official.
D. ) lemporary Certificate of Occupancy nay be issued providedno substantial hazard exist in the buitding or structure.
September 16, 1988
Town of Vail Building Department
Paul R. Johnston, President
- Chrlstlania r Inc.
Remodel/Denolition Permit
TO:
FROM:
RE:
As or.rner of the Christiania and managlng agent of
the Chateau Christian I hereby authorize rrRusty Spike"
to perform the demolition and [er^r construction as per
approved plans of architeet, John Perkins.
ChrisEi-ania, Inc.
Christiminl atvait
.ji6 L llrttunt littrtlt Kil \ "ti!. (.f itt|uth, '\l/.,5-'i :t)I l]-i);()'jl
.$
$$
$t
$f;
$I
$'t$,tln
JII
l,
0
utttiaTUS
-(t.td
.ll'rf3lr rl z-Jl
:i:rfv
lli )J'f, F' I.Y J. Itt lt r\t tl
f tl-
-lr I lT|'
-^!r- -ltll.I t rF $l
l-+
\\
N
\
..?',2 lall rI
Iti
:it
b
ijl
j$g
\-)\j---l
o<
-g*-
$T.trl 5c.\
\\-""it)t
\t
'.>
s
oa
o
4,.tr-' i:c-;.11.tlp \;o <;rf.A. ,r,l>L9
ItuLl ,+ral$c.{Eb-t
t||l l-{jt'l, Libr5
,t.1 az+,to.
/ treg*.l.pr
tl
I'w
- -t
Ir:
I
-J
2*'|}'+ (a- tb" aC-.
2 1'rllra
CArJ.., blaaL t!rL{-
4*- W)p\)
o
#Vr tt Wbit'.,nt/t, -.F,.v'Frq
f9wr44 bY::s
rr;r?rE/ x'& V4t/a'*
a-r*-frta. g lbr o'u,?"no A'/Y--=*ft4 toa-Jr. .rrr'tLa { ztO 3r'lr'J uel-
;t+ j.+'-*qlrtx
t.
Ffd'flr, ! ,L, Ftl,&lrJ,A
'1 e-*
lrb r't+brwA <r+t trur.la',eelf-pd-w*.,
Ff 4-
ls tZ Lf;lerlrE*
-'-- Qo ,-ttU-, tlItAM
F{t,+.,|>lj.rrlt'
lqt' 7a-rrut-*
l+6 bLo&.i/]q4
L++rq. F ,'Lirf /
t+a \rrd g l(2" a c.
wi
I4pa+talJ (,alts-?r. 4faLL
o o t o
t-rLtFJq C,tF
r.--l
+t>ublp i fotttJltHo 2ta'<
I
I
1.4'^ (aaU*rra,l fl"rrrr lr.rJ?,r'l ^\Wnr$
r4c2 ba:;bgc, La!,fa,-fj.U\
\l2+b )atql;
t'-l-'t bto. al*ql€l.,.
arS
Zr (t
, hrr-.t bl'Lqt l.
" 1-1\ i iJt'r.
.dg1gc, '-)t,&1.
r1
=pt=,r l-e rl I
=\l\
tll lu
rtl
!r €lrrell\
+:[
if
71rl0
J)
Ijt
it-+tlr
$$r'tl00
?T
j
)It
l-a
Ii
It
H
ta
ii
!
tItt
Fa
$l
1
1
I
tit
1
!l$
$
il
+I
-t-
'
l(
r$
$,$
L
1t
I
dIII
ts
t'ti
aj
JI
Lt-+I1N
Tt
aas
I ii rr'
:' I i tti!
'ljl3,i,lti I ii if:l
:'llr'it l
:iiti.',::il:li
o o
o o
o
fJ_oN- $EouEsr
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
MON TUES WED FRI fxM,./ \*/'A'f ,--rl€r*TrAt
PM
j+- qft/.- SrrV i\
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
N ROUGH / WATER
fFoorrrvcs / srEEL
ffor*ootoN / srEEL
tr FBAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION D POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr tr
trtr FINAL FINAL
MECHANIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING .
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
F.F#AL _--.-
tr
tr FINAL
PROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
{i:",{s t I
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT\tr -\.i. -QfiIDATE \V \ \ \}T\ JOB
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
*orr i'l -
colre*'N
MoN Gg, wED THUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
E SHEETROCK NAIL
\.rr''"rr
h..: .r:r ::' '-::tr
trtr FINAL
-
FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING -
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
E CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,/ -l
'r.-_*.tr
RECTIONS:
INSPECTO
trorrr REeuEsr
DATE
BEADY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES .WED )THUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEE.E ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING N GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION -tr POOL / H. TUB
E SHEETROCK NAIL tr
D
tr
tr_
tr FINAL FINAL
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL
tr APPROVED fforsorenoueo
hr"
[ff neruseecroN REeut RED
CORRECTIONS:
31gt ,*rttroNTOWN OF
DArE \o/';!q- JoB NAME duf:.i:r, at,i lg. '.
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
REOU€ T
VAIL
- 6t8c-
READY FOB
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGI{ / D.W.V.
F
'E
E
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATEB
D
tr-
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING I1 GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SI,IEETROCK
tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr
tr
tr
NAIL tr
tr
trrrrvAt FTNAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
E ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
/sArl.rlvvtrL
6nnpct'.,n
N DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CTIONS:
INSPECTOR
4/3f ION REQIJEST
OWN OF VAIL
\
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON ruES 6;)
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
E] TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
T] HEATING -
tr ROUGH -tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR -
tr
tr
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTO
ilroru REeuEsT
TOWN OF VAIL
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
. JOB NAME
MON WED THUR FRI
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr ROUGH
HEATING
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL FINAL
.E)AtrPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTO
-/J J -4)
PERMIT l.tUtr4eEn OF PROJECT
0ror.r REetJEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
At
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPEGTION:MON TUES wED @ r*'
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W,V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
-
tr ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING /ans PTPTNG -
tr INSULATION T] POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
trtr_
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH -tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr F)Y,L FINAL
/){Kppnoveo tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
ION REOUEST
VAILPEBMIT NUMBER OF PBOJECT\\ - \,.*.ri-p4Tg \r- \ 'r* \t-'";gg
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
NAME \=-
CALLER
MON TUES WED THUR Q)
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
CI ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr
r-t
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
D ROUGH
O CONDUIT
tr,Ff{AL FINAL
fuRovED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
,"$i"iho,
TOWN OF
A-/t\ l q,
REQUEST
\/Atl
tr
PERMIT NUMBE
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES -----@ PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEE
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER9wt-,(Pnnlrrrnc t-fl,"-t- " tf b<tr ler
_ hOOf & SHEER ,,l.,eokl& SHEER ,/1.'eol4tr ijiv'virobi'"r'ii L r r.r o tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
O SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
E HEATING
tr ROUGH
-
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
o E
tr FINAL _tr FINAL
/-TdPPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
3 s-s <'
PERMIT NUMB R OF FROJECT
qlr 1 JoB NAMEDATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
LOCATION:
*! +
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOW
O, l-:L
VAI
CALLER
TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
N FOUNDATI
D FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
U ROUGH i D.W.V.
tr ROUGH i WATER
ON / STEEL
- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NA|LING D GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
4-MEcHArutcet'
D HEATING
tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
FINAL
Tppaoveo I <- tflt DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
FINAL INSPECTION'S COMPLETED
The below jtems need to be complete beforegiving a permit a final C of 0.
Please check off in the box provided.
IT_T
FINAL MECHAN I CAL
DATE:\\ l/-\\ \--
(-\\N'\
S+
FINAL BUILD]NG
CERTI FICATE OF OCCUPANCY
TEMP0MRY C of 0
FINAL PLUMBING
FINAL ELECTRICAL
oz
L
=e.
uJo-
-.i (\
(t>
UJ
uJ
tJ-
F
IJ.J
esfift /u* #TD
Io,o@r @O{ Or
IP.ie .
N,N
I>r >r<r <E'E
I
zlt-1' z<r <&t-,,i-Zp4rSF
EItrF4lu-
>.,ioM
d,zPrc,|6d
lu
E
F
l.-Iz
=z
inutFoz
oz
I
l
06
oz
z
u-J
IJJo
i
tl-
o
Fo
Fz
o
aro
.Eulz3od
r!UJiz:=
Evf|rl
<F2^oz
6<
I
$wl!
JC
\
)
FiI
..9t\$!
\a
.l)
\
tn
\a)
'.i
z
14
F-l
^(l,
(E
(E
;ot-
o
ot
o
E
c
o
O
o)
==:
E
o
=l
o
o
3
.q)
3ig$9UF;coaP
;E E 8
EiEs.9 XE'Ac-o>':2 -E
:EFi; >= >.PoE.l of, o,r5;:
EEAREIEo- Q otiEoSgcsF
$iSeoo o-
SE; s
oi6-or
E.9 p.!(!cvP6 (! 6oE: x- c.Y x
*:E Ea(!!:
--t=(6 o'- is= o s)e-E,-
ef;; E
ss1:O(d=X
*5 F"
;*;:9E or -e5g:
-$!n e.l c{
c.l
.*
E
Eu,(L
z
J
l
d)
Y(J
uJ-oz)
ct-
!r,.1)
uJ
z
6
=
oz
Io
.IJ
=
ul
uJ
TL2
tr
UJ
ll.lg.
o
;g
UJEz
6t!o
F6
|lJ
z
uJ
x
F
UJo
U'
uJ
UJLrt
=
uJa
J
F
F
z
o
=f
EF(Jlu.J
UJ
z
=fJ
J
oz
I(J
UJ
=
Fl
Er
NO[Vn']VA
Fl
H
f,r
9sZZu--
^ ^ ^El:a = -r>F ^ q> z=.
? d 3Ea6 6 E,^,Z\-().i89 fr5LL<35 3Ei5 PHr(vclE
=>E
-I
t+.
F-]
z
t4B
m
El{z
Fl
F-]
F
zH
z
z
tr
{
LL
cc(,
o-
E('
|lJ
E.o-
I'JE
z
Eoo
Xa
Q9zotr
E
lrJ
=uJz
izlz
F
oo
o
O
O
I
U)
t-.
zl
=aul3o
ul
)(!
uJElr
oz
F
z
FI
uJI
III
tl
IItEltoltqlItrl
uJl
J
cc
uJz
cr
uto
F
zIF
J
az
I
-,1
t4z
z
I
-|
--l2rl
:I
o
-(t
Jl<li
z
z
o
gJ
LU
IJJzoF
(r
UJ
o-)
z
Eoo
=Fa
I
lq;
| ;.',l>oH
I
tlll
-ls I6.4
|
lEltitIEl'tolzi- --:
Ju-
H
FT
ztrl
E
H
z
Er
z
-
ii
=z
co
-')
zl
ol:lHI
<l
:l
>l<l4
z,
z
COz
CO
<n
uJ
J
=
I(L
+l
Ff
L(J
g
LIJ
o6
=
Io-
F (x
oz
(,
u,lc
J
ILoz
3l
9l tr
o
out
t!oz
31
9l
zH
E
F-lA
F-t
F-]
(/)
>1
rI]-
=E
I+
oz
utE
J
a>l
tl-l
\JI
zl
=l91r-t
F.
It(\
L/,i.J
IJJF v
z
IJJ
.J
a
l!
z
=t-
=t
o
=.)
t!
1l
<l>i
I
3lpl
UJ)
l!F
.Y
uJz
=
F
LUF
T
E.
E.
<F
trJ <ZE
TJJ F(nZ
)t<oOF
ES
XF-,2
= ,-r
IO
ZY
=#-) l-J7o-O
J t\.<^Otrza)
=#iiz
=g
E i,
=
\.z
<Osil=l
uJFo
coo-zo
F(L.ul Y
, lrJlo
oF
F
IYHosco
|!oro-
o_ o\o-o p.rr<r=
HuJbkzo
."*3\./ \,, =
=83dd=-t<__EUU
F
tr
uJ(L
lt
?!{FZc<ofo96 "-!B91l i!
ci-
EJF5 b=(J*i-
o<*., v u-E ooE 5+t x>6t;Fct "ilD-itttr.H
o
-et
z
zQ
c0o2Z
dr
F
=Elrlo-zo
F(J
:)EFazo
CJ
t]ftn
t
=ca
@
at,l!IJ
lJ-
==
tU
u-
.A
EIFoz
=
-Jldl
.6
=z
N
F
F
t!
Jt!
o\
-\o!u .c
!oq(a
JOIY()
^c
.Erb
!c)
)o'Etc:agio
loio
'oD
ii'5
E
o
tr
o
o
3.;
q)c
E .ola3
E.mu)
qx
cO
o.:
3€
-ol
- :'r3.: i
>3t
Q-N (i,rrl,;i
isi
l"il-rIOtc
'.E o
:Pjr:!. xli Xt'
;(EC
'f :
o,t o'=b
pJ
':D6O
o9
tI
qio3';(gE
-o
(J::oo
C)m
2ul
^P
th
n36ocF
>=
r5
5 3.
=o
1t
.aEr
) a.,'- |
'o-lr- |r-'I
os
E.y
'Er
>.'i
F^o-o-
(|)qt
=3GJ:
EE
f:
:o
.9u
t! t,
E'-u=
- attq)a!
_c)
:';
-o-
'=
:!-o
)'--=ls
!(s
i(!i
(!I
'?! Ic.:
(Ui
*-c
o)+
65o>
(E:
Y()
=.,trTOU
ldTo,
l'=
.JadI t1,
lclo
leItslx
t'-l(D
.s
f,o.
!:g
=,
cl
(!r
a(
I
(E'
-;
GiC
t! 0J
:'!5
;3
>.9oa)
ro
-o
$\
\
\J
lttu,
UJ
o
uJ
zo
=
o
c<
t
=uJ
z
=UJ
_|.|,
o-
uJ
+
l!
5
z
)
NO|lvn']vA
1
.jt
I
t,')-<l''
iiF1,:]
Jl
I
I'raIr/tft\
i-'
oa
Zt
trvlql
I -rl3al
3;lil'-ilzrll
ur---..1
n:
TA €\\)v{
- E Qr'\
(\I
z2OO
i\ O- =<f,=^=lL:
9oF5\)z*s
.*3>()FO
-ioi
1
f,o
--rl<Itrl
z1
.. >lotu
t!
UIz
<t,
=E
uj
J
zo
FlU
F
ru
l
J
I
F
ahFz
z
!f('F IIJ<()o<
> il:EE
61oo<z
aD
tr2..
z=
-F
rlj(53 r.r
:
ioltrl;lol<l
E
=lrt
i
r
tr
\
F
\\\-
\/l
\{
v
I
I
I
I
II
IY
J
I
lr
I
I
I
F
q
Ia
71)
L.y
s
N
:lvl
I\JI
$il
,llFtl
otl
f
.l
ol
I
I
J
14
dcl
JaE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I\l
\'l
I:l
trl
I
I
&l
f,-l
1
zl.l(rl
url
1l
<t'>l
rLIol
=lH
I
I
I
I
I
I.l
=l
t?l
ql
<l>l
bl
zl
Bi
YiFI
\
E
I
I
I
I
\l
=l
EI
J
EF
tlJ
<Fc()uJ<
TIJ FOZo
C)ulL.r
C)
:9
5t.\-
;JZ
C)
F_
Fz
2
I
LU
v
t-
uJ
,Et- l-
o
=Fea 4.
\-/ LEO5$g z
5sfr :fr.i=i E?;:5 ifi!i;E tr[!F -.t- J t-l
='= uJ :-l5;b =l _r;35 Fl ."i$:+3 rl i#*
EI; :I ;$I
sq * EtDiu,-loIo+F+
^c.. UJ OF --.t.-H CEI +JE< roEUclrJ >-. ,uCL.J-o- cr<5 o- )<Z< q)
Ju- (/|
|<H g)trv C
ca.=Oc.6U-raL(,-EOro It-.:J .n Io onlt! E 0.J Ilrl E -lzoo-lLJ FI
-
a
><XX
Nl
N
N\
m
H 3=3o(/) <5 Lq-(D zF o9 E.-z 3Sto :{: <z)r E -5 c...,
IIJ lrl:<=.ur --cvql
oF
ts
Itl\-
Hoo;coolor
tv)
HFo!Zc
uJ
x
F
E
E,llto-zo
Fc)fEF.azo()
/. ('t'?'.-- J dt- J
)
INSPECTION
TOWN OF
l,: r'\ .- I
REQUEST
VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
JOB NAME
INSPECTION: MON
CALLER
TUES WED THURBEADY FOR
LOCATION:
D^rE s"/-2 (.
{: r, tt ,i '' ' : lrl
r\'Ii, J.t" l')
\._.1 r)
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
R6oucu / D.w.v.
DrouGH / wArER{irY'}g
rr'ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr tr
trtrFINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr FINAL
/l tr FINAL
/fttnoveo
]ORFFCTION
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
ECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
t
INSPECTION REQUEST
VAILPERMIT
DATE :
READY FOR
LOCATION:
-'-i-i- JoB NAME
TOWN OF
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES WED PMAM
NUMBER OF.PROJECT
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
,tr UNDEBGROUND
O FOUNDATION / STEE-ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr HEATING _
tr EXHAUST HOODS
-tr SUPPLY AIR
VED
co RECTIONS:
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
INSPECTOR
IN
I
SPE
d4
CTION
TOWN OF
,-fot
REQUESTPERMITNUMBR OF PROJECT
DATE w
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
rr ROOF & SHEEH- PLYWOOD NAILING I] GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
r] SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
PROVED
co RECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
:
jop" rti Fertins/Architect, A.lAlvo,, |lo.ron 1000 Lions Ridge Loop/ ,.fr*roit, coto. s16ss/g03- 476-ss1s
7 July 1987
Krlstin P.r,itz, Town Planner
Town of VailN. Frontage Road W.Vail, Colorado 81657
Chan in Sco f the e Remodel
Dear Kris;
The following changesof the Christiania:in scope :*?-ve been decided upon by the owners
The elevator and top floor addltlon are eliminated.
The elimination of the 0Z rooms (tO7, 2OT, BO7) has beendropped. These rooms wilf remain,
The corridor improvements have been eliminated.
The density variance granted by the plannlng Commissionis no longer needed.
Phase II (office and l accomodation unit) and phase III (eliminationof 1_dwelting unit and 1-aundry and restaurant additions) will bappenas planned presented and approved by the planning commission. TL;off-site improvements (parking lot and Milr creef pedestrian path)will be reduced to just transplanting any mature trees need.ed to beremoved to the north side of the parking lot, please d.iscuss thisand advise me as soon as possible.
YoU '
M. Perk
cc: Paul Johnston
Andy Beck and Associates
st iania
':loo
x-)5,5
-r'il.JIprV.
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
o a
,.o lg\,n,Mo"" a l'U,/u F
Project Application
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
I '.,ILegal Description: Lot .17\ , Btock d^ , Fiting
Com ments:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:IVC\
APPROVAL
tl
\--l
I
I
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
El Statt Approval
lnttn
75 south lrontage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 oftlce ol communlty developmenl
May 2L, LgA?
Mr. John M. perkins
P.O. Box 266Vail, Colorado BL658
Re: Design Review Board Approval of the Christiania LodgeRernode} , May 20, L9AT
Dear John:
9t M1y 20,.L987,_the Design Review Board gave final approval tothe christiania Lodge rern5der with the roirowing conditions:
1. A revised landscape and parking plan for the l_ot to thenorth of the christiania Lodge wirr ue subrnitted. before a?:illil? permit wilt be reLeased. rhis new arawinf ino"iarndicate parking spaces, property lines, and proposeitlandscaping..
_ The ptan sfr-oulal also show trees that will berost due to the remoder and trees that wilr be removedfrom the Christiania site, but replanted in the parkinglot area. The board. also suggested that as much wid.th aspossible be maintained. for ttr6 tanascaped area arong theparking 1ot.
2. Vail Associates will need to provide a letter approvingthe-landscaping and-paving prin ror trre-f;;ki"g'iot. - -.
Staff wiII aLso need to knoir exactly whal work will becompleted on-the west side of the 16t. This informationmust be subruitted before a build.ing p".ril-rirr u" ------
. released.
3 ' Drawings for the trash encrosure should be submitted assoon as possible. Staff may approve these drawings,loy9tg., the inforrnation sh6uld be subnitted before abuilding pernit may be released.
4' You wilr need to make a finar selection on which entrydesign you would rike to use, The Design aeview Board
requested that the staff show the final entry design tothen infornally at a Design Review Board *""iirrg. Thisshould also be completed before a building permit rnay bereleased.
5. The Board requested that if the overrid.e for the erevatoris increasea, it must be reviewed t-ih; o""ig" ReviewBoard. Any increase would be considered to be anythinggreater than what was shown on the drawings at the May 20meeting.
6' There was a great dear of discussion on relocating thepedestrian path along Mirl creek on the west side of thecreek. The Board did state that the paLh nay go on theglst side, but they definitely preferied the'west side, asthey felt construction would Le^ easier. ih;y also feltthat it would.!" " good idea to try to landslape and cleanup the west side of the creek. Hoirever, the finaldecision on the location of the path, the design of thepath, and who wilL ^be responsibfa fo; ruifaing-the pathmust be decided before any Uuitaing permit wiff Uereleased on the project. I also t5ei trrat ii wi1l Ueimportant to review the path desitn riit-it"-Design Revi.ewBoard.
The DRB also mentioned that they Liked the idea ofbuilding a small stone foot path d.own to a smal1 seatingarea on the east side of the creek. In general , tnoughi fbelieve that.the Design Review Board preierred to see themain pedestrian path on the west side of the creek. They
1+=g- suggested that perhaps the path could be built in asr-mrrar way to the concrete path that is on the west sideof the MilI Creek Court Builaing.
If you decide. to work with Cyranors on this path, it doesappear that the__path was parl of two previoui approvalsfor Cyranors. However, I am not =rrr"'exactiy whatapproved proposals they actually constructedi Furtherresearch will be necessary on tlris issue.
A1so, I wanted to rernind youthat:of the PEC reguirernent that stated
Thefor
rrone of the new accornmodation units will berestricted as a short term rentaf unii-peiianenttyand will not be taken out of the short i;il rentalprogram at any tirne. The restriction wili contj_nue
!_o "ppry even if rhe projecr is "";;;*i;ii*ir"o o,the ownership changes. ihis condition straii newritten in a legal staternent submitted to -iatt Uythe owner before a building pernit wiff Ue issued.n
restriction should be recorded at the county on the deedthe property.
congratulations on a well-done project. I appreciate yourcontinued effort to get inforrnalion to me on Lime duriirg thereview process. r know that there were many l-oose ends to tryto keep track of. Thanks again, John.
Sincerely,\/ I f\ rx. I t./'l
lnttc\Yfrl+Kiistan plttz
Town Planner
KP:br
I
dur\o,r,to-
l
.
LIST OF MATERIALS
LODGE REMODEL
O?" 12, L'BT
NAME OF PROJECT: CHRISTINA
DESCRIPTION OF P
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS;
The following information is_required for submittal by the applicant to the Design ReviewBoard before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
\
Roof
Si di ng
Other },lall Materials
Fasci a
Soffi ts
Wi ndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
B. LANDSCAPING:Name of Designer:
phone:
Dennis Anderson Assoc. Inc.
PLANT MTERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES
BE REMOVED
Picea Pungens
Glauga
Popufus
Tremuloides
TO TRANSPLANTED
eTcea Fungens
GIauca=-..---.-...-HJ_ nU S Contorta
latifolia
Colorado
Br.ge_S!_g-S-se
Quaking
A q rran:::-tr:ji-
Colorado
Blue Spruce
Fo-8fl6p-5TE- eine
Quani ty
8
Botanical Name Common Name Sf ze*
f 0'
3l 24" car
20,
*Indicate caliper for deciducious tnees. Indicate hejght for conifers.
(over)
20'
PLANT I'IATERIALS:
(con't)
SHRUBS
o;
Botanical Name
(rrri nrrr
vulgaris
Conmon Name
Common Purple
Lilac
Quani ty
q
Si ze
3-4'high
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO 8E REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
TYPe
River rock (2-4" )
Square Footage
200 s.f .
s0D 950 s.f .
SEED
AutomaticTYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES
Random
(retaining wal l s,
set Sandstone
fences, swimming pools,
Path, redwood bench,
etc,) Please specify.
and boulder
reca.ln ng wal]s.
o
coM[roN/ACCESSORy SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATTONSfor the CIIRISTIANIA LODGE
BEMODEL AND ADDITION
28 Apri_l 1982
Pro
Space
Corridors
Stairwe 11s
Lounge ft.crtlv'-Office
Airlock
. Mechanical
Storage
Sub-totals
AIb'rrad
Space
Corridors
Elevator core
Laundry /
Lounge i
StoraEe
s.f./floor to GRFA
Sub-totals
sed Additional Lod.e Common,/Accesso Use Areas
Common
1102 .5
230 .0
72.O
36. O
180. c
1620 .5irs.
Cornrnon
2S5.5
40 .0
52.O
377.5
-250.5
L27.o
Accessory
769.25
447.25
r2L6.5
Accessory
378 .0
378.0
756;O
Existing Christiania/Chateau/Vit1a Front Desk Common S
Front desk, officesPublic restrooms,Corridors & stairs
Sub-totals
,lleo.
R]677.O
677.O
Pro a Front Desk Common S
Office, Lobby,
Maintenance
2nd floor office,Corridor
Sub-tot a1s
271.05
454.00
725.05
1e!_4-s
Existing conmon
Proposed common
Total common
,^7 7 7?5)
./
fr!
3.149.5 s.f.
Existing accessory
Proposed accessory
Total Accessor
L r2L6.5 s. f .
756.O
L.972 .5
$IWdr;- site coverage )i6( e
Proposed site coverage
4 1882.1
777 .9
Total site coverase 660. O s. f.35
l-,d*rdscaped area w/o pool area 5,418.6 s. f . ( 33% )
2 r297 .5
-e hLt
-l
LIST OF ADDITIONS
Basement Floor
378 s.f. house laundry
Conversion of Room 100 to housekeeping office
Conversj.on of o1d laundry to ski storageConversion of Room 300 bath to public men's room/vending areaElimination of Room 107 - merges into Room 109Elimination of 76.5 s.f. of storage - merges into
Room 105Elevator service
First Floor
. 378 s.f. to Sarah's Lounge. Ellmination of Room 207 - merges into 209. Elimina.tion of 76.5 s.f. of office - merges into 10b. Elevator service. 100 s.f. new office space. 25 s. f . mai_ntenance closet. 156 s.f. new lobby space
Second Floor
-lt{
ulddl",
. Elinination of 302 - merges. Eliminat i-on of Z6 . 5 s. f . of. 3014 new A.U. 394 s.f.. Office and corridor 454 s.f.. Elevator service
Third Floor
. New floor. 5 new A.U.s/1962 GRFA. Storage 52 s.f.. Corridor 285.5 s.f.. Elevator Service. Dormer windows w/window
into 309
storage - merges into 305
seats on the south elevation
+t
fgyjffi,.,/ t'euj'bftaJ
qp46+ r]f {' hi*
CHRISTIANIA LODGE REMODEL 1987
The Christiania Lodge currently has 27 public accomodation unj-ts,phase I of the 1987 remodel results in a net loss of four P.A. unitsand a new gain of one P,A. unit, resulting in a gross loss of threeP.A. units.
Pha.se II results in a net ga.in of f ive P.A. units, therefore withthe completion of Phases I a.nd II, the Ghristiania Lodge would havea final totar of 29 P.A. units, a gross total addition of two uni-ts.
-De"nSAty allowable indicates 9 dwelling units, or 18 accomodati,onunits are al1owed. This application would request a variance forthe existing uni-ts over allowed density and the two new units to beadded.
A froqt s9!q.?_-'e.'l< ygqiancethe office iitiilti"on andarea. This would cover
Parking units are as follows:
1D.U.
28 A.U.
Exist ing GRFA (7 ,232.8 s. f , )
New GRFA (2 ,635.2 s. f. )
New lounge seating (32 seats)Chateau (by agreement )
Tot al
is requested to al1ow a 3' cantilever ofP.A. unit above the entry/office/front deskthe entry sidewalk. *
1.5 spaces
11.2 spaces
7.2
2.6
4.O
9.0
35.5 spaces
A re-configured parking layout will be submitted as soon as possible.
The 1980 parking lot configuration shows a totar of 33 space. It isbelieved that the north lot can be re-configured to allow an addition-al two spaces, and the west lot can handle an additional one space ina valet parking system as is being used in that 1ot currentry. rt isbelieved that a parking variance is not requlred.
Height considerations are as follows: The present ridge line is 36'above grade at the fowest point. The new ridge line is 40'-6" abovegrade at the lor,vest polnt. A height varlance 1s not required. Ere-vations will be shown on the site p1an.
* A porte coehere bearing support will be founded inside the existlngplanter approximately 3 to 4 feet inside the north property 1ine.Additional site survey information is in process and will be submltted.A. S.A.P.
t
Pm,"": fuu/hN[\ a^I 0.x
+ tl4. 0lo,v. ur*}. ;gt
* 4,"d rbn Boan. f?d^
+ Nr U+r\t^" in \D?+ 1:
\-r+ Iuoqd + Y''fLuJ lp"-cq,c
l
p;iL ba,-L
!*b".!t'
+ fqsA1 L'* Irhr"d **1 .
6{o{ND
;i-tt
;l
rKD\silnD\)
ii6t**
iiUN IT5
tttfha.
''0mrr\'
.6LTA
ilt/c;t
I
/aDO -' ,
lcDo
E
?EO -t^"lry.,
Err4
lr4t, tT5
ilws-
:-
i'.i
- iii,
', tl
:l
!i
l?, :!
!:I'
3rt
ects+
1n (.+ lr.i(-
D
!
li
i!
t
fuaq1
f A,tL.c
ei5l A, (.+ I D,U,lro
Ia
'( v-L. 2y
t;lJ.t"-
*
I ,1.[.^
,L-.-
I oo
hnst{,t5u^dl,yilf*$. uJln."ell Q A, (1, = | 0. r{)
AIhreJ 'o
q 'D. bL, cr [5, l,U ,
(u(tt.lU; .if il,tl*+ I ilL'er F.-f P,{1,
Ptx?Dlo', g A,0, 1 1.0.e,,r lf OlI,
DIFF , l, t,0- Ctr. ar" ] A , ldr,
lJ 4,tlr.
€}\1-I\NL t, bq )"
pQip0ftD to,01I
e€IYl. $lfTte [00: 315]
a{ zY "l-
eD% (omrc'un F+. F:X Ailour, 6wA) ffh.*SIS_A,tUf:',:-[\uf,r ], ad,{6ufiiM d, tlf r.f'
t oDt{# l, m+I,f,
ao
@
Acass
Io{bo.Ls,
r"68Athuq
(l"rlT
fl{f,,'?,fP
tE4'.ed,
€R"utr$6,
JD' a\\ s','dla
ff.hffo'' P, n,y'.3*i
, s,$
f[D].]T;
6*rtr,
P€DP.
tQ\AtNtttfr:
€.5rD€:
$. so,k-
5i€b.gr
o
At\o,lrej t8'
tiirl
ii
ii
i:
ii
i.
ri
oo
d War
u,q7
),rJ ftur I
I
ir lt r2:-t-., f-'L .,1 / L J
il , t''\'. . c;J*.
r *,i(, . t, lt
I D,it+ /#t 2
U
.J
,nd c td, u ,( 0*
,1,1, J?I 3/. 83
?
'|c '13
r
"3q
-i
t,fta
r?&
') t{o
\
t,
4,
Ir
q
tl
l
I
/ ezo
(\
i.,' i'..' r
i'l
\,'_-1 1., :: " i, I I ,.
1, , .!i ', ,l
I
lli ril ,; i i',
I
l/,{''
t
t;
I
.:i
r
a
ry
trA,ft =
---.a;iai---;--!
-:
ot
hotr,\d T\*r,
<OnVna,rl
)Toe, t ,e l8'
rld-.[L 1'2t lJ4'
tTDu 6' * lJ-
Jlo1" tl.fv f,
Iurrilf. t{.. B(2}.f
lez
)13nz
tbo
JoS
l00L
lLt ti@
'l}- ,( ttt 'llf
\D,t r- tl,S-r ltD
l\r iq :
5.S-t 6.f
5,t tf .'t " je
,t\ JLI\. t:Y
=@
l}-xA).t "@
0"
\CI ,r
*f"t'l+--f
$,.'as
tu1:
,iloa,
luq
,ha'
PAo
lot 1r8
agL
lD5'-
3Dt
3Dt
lD3
lbz
tD.{
ru6
@n^rv\.
lgr-
lzf
3L
tDr.
trll{lzr-r.*})sl?,fu\l'5:-2Dl
L rr t)- LY
lr.l v 11 :g,5'4sf
Sd/vl\o. ar l[It-
ll rf},f,
IDS= rt.t*r.tYr ltl \ -L.fr tl . .l|[/y,b\
tr St ?. f. . yt )\-t
brifl, r:l.tr-l{'tr
S.s r-lf.f
tI
(:
oI
3oSuf
lw
l{o
282
*t
f0,ftd f2. 3 |
l-o.s
ll
I
I
li
ll
oo
dnJY\oiu LX'
"}o t
^(Yto} a&L L1,fu8) {.r* q)-'}6Dla \r"
.lDr . t{D
)o? tio
JDq J}5
Jor luf
)Dh 3u;
1i:t [ ]D5
IDL t}t
^trtao
J,l r}.o{. tDt{
jqra(r\ .s I \
#lir'iie ,$
N,*ft 3,r3la,{l -JZ
o
-SDI{
,D'
.,'.*-
oa
el8
Y>
lt. l;r lt-- l6q t t)r 3 /t,S
] yiS ll lo El'/.t nf
rv
lo- tory-]. :*q9 ^l I rr-Fff, dt Y.)
Itto.
I
a
GRFA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS AND BREAKDOIfNS
foT the CHBISTIANIA LODGE REMODET AND ADDITIONS
27 April 1987
Floor by floor and room by room GRFA breakdo'rrlns:
BASEIIENT FLOOR GRFA
Exist ingRoom No.
101
103
10s
-107
1C9
-100 p.lj.
ro2
104
106
262
276
188
186
233
Proposed
+76,5 (stor. )
e l iminat ed
+'07.C (common
room to become
wa11)
off ice-311
27 4e|-.)
308 ?.,:r.'
302 .:' '
Sub-totals:
7 A.U.s 2 ,030 ,I
FIRST FLOOR GRFA
+83.5
Proposed
+76.5 (office)
room to be eliminated+07.0 (common wall)
Room No.
204
203
205
-207
209
202
204
206
Exist ing
262 ?,t,
270 2t?
190
r87 1'.'L
233 n'.'',".
2741''.,
308 '"', .
3o2 ^:i"Sub-totals:
7 A.U. s 2,ozl 7'l1t'
SECOND I'I,OOR GRFA
Exist ing
0
262 >l'b
371 rr;u
19O r
186 j-i::,
233 )j',
4801
924 i,;.:
27 4a't':
308 '',''1
r93.5
Proposed
+'394 (new room)
.r 5O ( deck )+76.5 (stor)
room to be eliminated+07.0 (common wa11)
''' tJ t
Room No.
+ 301A
301
303
305
-307
309
300 (D.u. )
302
304
306
308
.. )\
302 ,'.
Sub totals:
9 A.U.s/1 D.'tJ. 2,929
Dil\'>
l'
)
+527.5
Room No.
3OO (1oft)
4At
402
404
406
408
PROPOSED TIIIRD FLOOR GRFA
Exist ing
250
o
o
n
0
0
Proposed
426
433
336
337
428
Sub-totals:
5 A.U.s
Totals:
Rooms
250
Existing GRFA
+L,962
Proposed GRFA
2,656.528 A. U. s/1 D. U. 7 ,232(29 units)
ab[{qlD(6'rt,"''l tI ,I rt l.irl": rn iToroSd-l' SU'JIi,ARIES
l0 )"
fu^r
Lot area 151938.61 s.f.
Maximum al1owab1e GRFA 12,750.88
Existing GRFA 7,232.80
Proposed additional GRFA 2,656.50
Proposed total CRFA 9,889.30
Itaximum allowab1e common space ( .2O'/,) 2 , bbO.1Z
Existing cornmon space 3,280 s.f.
\ Proposed additional common space 21567
\- Proposed total cornmon space _ Sr84Z s. f .)-)-.---.-\\ a,' (qoungg, trccerlrricaA, ski storage, laf,ndry, front desk, 1obby, staf foffti-es, maintenance, linen storage, stairwells, elevator shafts,public restrooms, and corridors.)
Allowable site area covered by buildings ( .SSy">&anf! 6Total proposed (efisting and proposed) areacovered by building
Required area to be landscaped (.302)
Landscaped area (treed & sodded areas,pool and sun deck)
8,766.23 s.f .
5,660 s.f.
4,781.5
7,2L8.6
u.N.
\o^dI
I o
Aprll )A I9B7
Ms. Krlstin Pritz
Comnunity Development Department
Town of Vail
Vail , CO 8f657
RE: Condominlum Assoclation Approval on Chrlstianla Remodel
Dear Kristln:
As managing agent for the Chateau Chrlstlan Townhouse Assoclation'
Inc. I have been authorized to advlse you of consent frorn the
Assoclatlon Board of Dlrectors for the remodeling of the Christlanla
Lodge and the conectlng llnkage wlth the Chat.eau Chrlstlan bul1ding.
Do not hesitate to contact me 1f you gave any questions about this
approval . The Associatlon Covenants and Declaratlons authorize the
board approval under Sectlon 3:11, 7:1, and 9:7.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Utristiilnin: atvait i
i
I lart.sott llttrtcl.t ltrl. \'t.r.i!. (.ttlttratlrt ,\ l(')t7 ( )0.J ) i7b 5(t i I -j
I
.a
U^d1 Iornuno;
o
n^I \ n /l ri ,.
\Ifl4,4 - - n\rrz,/ rntil/ tlli+[, hi,il^/t-""\ \ tx{cf ^ v'v2+ vv\ Ir\ tvyYY\ll ( |vv
i.
'vv
--- -m"54 D^,,'Q- !aodh'r. n4'dps"!-.^fl=- :
1 - l^fl"-h"'Ll ---
o
iit$+ t\nltr{r PD.&, t J$\ ttd'fud lle- ebn
,C\^d@r tbemrvrk on\ t sp.,ot ftiu^ Okl {\r},,0v ll v
4S{Fwq B*\-d""t,
I+\isb @qqr no\> +\'* {{o6 , ,
;,trurdlcnpd I sD't ruur\ bl_ ta,'ndsra+d ,
;;Gr,nrnor,-' €i , fuoq- , {M efia" Ntlo r"l, N\h}eJ,
t.U, {l }slft
." Sr ,to.ltqpip Lhnr{ guu\ ru rilo* rh rr./t'\ tu l
J-IApplication Date '-Apart_ tb, tqD')
PEC MEETING DATE VIAY IIT Iq6T
APPLICATION FOR A VARiANCE
I. Th'is procedure is.required f91 any project requesting a variance. The applicatjonwjll not be accepted until all iniormation is'submitied.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT PNL *Jo$HSlter.I
ADDRESS Ec E?. ilnrqsExt par.Jc+{ ppl,o
YAILI cbtpe@ r 6t6s1 pH0NE4Zr- Sc4,l
8. NAME OF APPL]CANT'S REPRESENTATIVE JAUT*1 V!^. PEPFIh.rS
ADDRESS T?o. @* 26b
VAla 6 8r6sb PH0NE q44 - 4e''
C. NAME OF OWNER(S e or prin 4 SA,l V rjatt|.t
)'l
ADDRESS 3 e.l-taxtsEt..t kAl.tcF+t?aAtrt
PHoNE 41c'-@P|
n LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS bSCa E.l{,\t*ls,tsl*l F*xfH l2aq6
F
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT b BLOCKi Ftllrue Ftesr ( uteL utUee)
FEE $i 00
THE FEE MUST BE
YOUR PROPOSAL.
PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT l,,lILL ACCEPT
F. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject propertyINCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND AcROsS brnLrrs, anl their mail.ing uiaresses.- '
THE APPLICANT |^JILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECi MAILING ADbRESSES.
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE hIITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTEDTO )DETERMINE IF ANY'ADDiTIONAL iNFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION W]LL BEACcEPTED uNLtss IT-Is_COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE nrr iirni REQUTRED By THE zgNrNGI9IINItIR4Igts). Ir IS THE APPLicANIs RESpoNSrBrLriy T0 Mnre nn nppoiruir,rEnrt,/JTH THE STAFF TO F]ND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMiiiR|. NEqUINTMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION 14|ILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FORYOUR PROJECT BY-DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNINGAND ENVIR0NMENTAL C0MMISSI0N MAY sTIPULATE. nLi coruotrr0NS 0F AppRovAL MUsr BECOMPLITD l^JITH BEFORE A BUILDING PTNI,IIi_TS-iSSIJE6.--''-'
IlI. F0UR (4) COPIES 0F THE F0LL0WING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEMTNT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THEREGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
l' The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potentialuses and structures in the'vicin.ity.
?, The^ degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation andenforcement of a^specified regulation js.necessary to aitrieve compatilirityand uniformity o! treatment afrong sites in irre vitlnitv-o. to attajn theobiectives of this tiile without grant of speciat pi.ivitege.
DEPARTMENT
OVER
O va.iance
3- The effect of the variance on light and ajr, distribution of population,
transportation, traffic facilities, uti lities' and public safety.
B. A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at'l east lrr - 20r stamped
by a Col orado I i censed surveyori nc1 udi ng I ocat'ions of a'l 'l exi sti ng improve-
ments, 'i ncluding grades and elevatjons. Other elements whjch must be shown
are parking and loading areas, ingress and egress,'l andscBped areas andutility and drainage features.
C. A site plan at a scale of at least lu = 20' show'ing exj sting and proposed
bui ldings.
D. A11 preliminary building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate
the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces
existing and proposed on the site.
E. A preliminary title report to verify ownersh'ip and easements
F. If the proposal is'l ocated in a multi-family development whjch has a homeowners'
association, then written approval from the association in support of the
proJebt must be received by a duly authorized agent for said associatjon.
G. Any additional material necessary for the revjew of the application as
detennined by the zoning administrator..
* For interior modifications, an improvement survey and site plan may be
waived by the zoning administrator.
IV. Time Requi rments
The Planning and Envjronmental Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays
of each month. A complete application form and all accompanying materia'l
(as described above) must be submitted a mjnimum of 4 weeks prior to the date of the
PEC public hearing. No incomplete applicatjons (as determined by the zoning
administrator) will be accepted by the planning staff before or after the desig-
nated submittal date.
.jl
j: i.r.' t:i i'f:i
i
o
: " rtorur simncr ,
n r A r l'I f I 'rr.,n I O n, .nt,
Jnd. ftbdr (aC,t0UQf-- +0( \ I-\tL {- yailW 0ffiic!-fL-I- f,..- \'i *p nU n ^- . 1^.^^l ' t^ -,^- W
tbr,4L_ bc-[6t(,- N* n uarpbiad, Jpart.
,3r& Ao'r lJ\&[, *% *r^ilb -o!
I
,-.*."... .- ..,- !
PUBLTC NOTICE
NolrcE rs HEREBY GrvEN that the planning and Environmental
comrnission of the Town of Vair wirl hord a public hearing in
accordance with section 18,66.060 of the municipal cod.e of the
Town of Vail on May 11, 1987 at 3:OO pM in the Town of Vail
Municipat Building.
Consideration of:
l-. Request for density, setback and parking variances in order
to construct additions to the christiania Lod.ge located at
356 Hanson Ranch Road on Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village lst
Filing.
Applicant: paul Johnston
2- Request for an amendment to a special development district in
order to change a tennis court to a parking 1ot at vair Run
Resort (speciar Deveropment District No. 5) located at r-023
Lionsridge Loop.
Applicant: Mr. William Fleischer
3. A request for a density variance in ord.er to enclose g
balconies and 2 decks at the Treetops condominiurns rocated. at
450 East r,ionshead circle on Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Li-onshead
First Filing.
applicant: treetops Condominium Association
4- A request for a conditionar use permit in order to expand the
outdoor dining deck at Brurs Beanery Restaurant l0cated at
193 East Gore creek Drive on Tract A, Block sB, vail village
First Filing.
Applicant: Blurs Restaurant
The applisations and inforrnation about the proposars are avaitabre
in the zoning administratorrs office d.uring reqular office hours
for public inspection.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THOMAS A. BRAUN
Zoning Administrator
Published in the vait Trail on April 24, L}BT
ooADttrsr wwYlg-DNEP.S
C}\hrf!"atJ cll2tsflANllA AS*-{.CrF,$1DHc/o fAV (D*, trEErs.
IIOQ BPANboN EaAD
Lr,)lLnnlN@rcnr t fu-.
lqbo-)
VAIU ASSOCjAffiS
Eox r
V/qlL, (D.
Ela+6
VIL\A UAL t+rLA AEsscr*$leh..l
o/a. Bn'.r'.PV cPAbocl<bt eA€bE+_t * tl1z- crt)s PoAb
(:,oLoRsso snalNcrs ) c_,oL_oeADo
&q7b
St\, ,^ ilkL
t'tryiff'flH
{'+t;Pi^tihd'1dil'*o*'*
45a,VS'
Yp.
mlLL (eaeL (oOq
c/o Agr|\ue' blaHcp 43oZ l+trN\eh-,r RANI:I-\
VA\L I Cb "
&taso
/--'' Cqt,l qtl 5
\" 1-/E-'L
''kthryb,hl
L"tr-
ayqt"; $1
{)'- li U0li
-. ..., d,t ft"^ I< yb !
FqscqtrFf-toh-l
@.
Pc>Ar<> O VV 1r+ g\tr t , totj
/r't'iJ ( n -,- ,' 1
BlL\,1.d I
,. 3-'n, .(:" / Y/ u/f l
MEMORANDUI{
TO: PLANNING AND BNVIRONMENTAI, COMMISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMIINITY DEVELOPI,IENT
DATE: 8/2L/80
RE: Parking variance reguest for Paul Johnston to add a 21800 sq
ft adclition to the Clrristiania Lodge located on part of Lot D, Block 2'
Vail Village lst Filing, in a Public Accommodation (PA) zone district.
DESCRI.PTTON Or VARTANgB REQUESTBp
The Ch::istiania is re-arranging and adding floor space in their loclge.
No additional units are being created, just larger units and some offj.ce
space for internal operations of the lodge" Building heigltt is being
raised in cerlain places, but not so.as to negatively affect view corridors
or to violate zoning retrictions
The parking situation for the Christiania has been the problem in the
study of this proposal . Parking facilities for the Christiania existin two locations: A gravel lot across the street (Hanson Ranch Road),
and a small area West of the Lodge. Complicat.ions arise when the parking
requirements for the ChristianiaCondominiums, located East of the lodge'
;rre figured in, because they also use the lot across the street from
the' Lodge,
In the last few days, questions over the amount of parking spaces whichtlte condos have a riqrht to in the lot have arisen. If, as presented'by Mr. Johnston, the condos have a right to only one spot per unit,
no parking variance \,rould be needed by the Christiania Lodge for theiraddition. The Lodge is 3 spaces short rohen the new addition i-s figured
in along with the norrnal allotment given to the condos according to
zoning (15 sp-qggs). There are 9 condos existing, so if they only have
rights to 1.u6;ia-, the Lodge makes up 6 spaces and needs no variance.
The Staff is reguiring written proof of the parkj-ng arrang'ement withthe condos before the waiving of the variance is granted.
The memo is being written, and PEC is considering the matter undertlre assumption that, at the time of the hearing, no written agreementj-s produced. The 3 space variance would be subject to the $151000fee.
Christiania-2-8/e0
CRTTBRIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, section 18.62.060 of the MunicipalCode, the DeparLment of Community Development recommends approval ofthe requested Variance based upon the following factors:
-
Consicleration of FactorF
l. The relationship of the requested. variance to other existi-:rg orpotential uses and structur6s in the viciniLy:
Vail Associatc;s has indicated their possible desire to consiructa 1od.ge on the existing gravel 1ot. As a potential use, parkingfor the christiania complex wourd. need to be taken care oi at that.tiute in a sufficient manner. The planni-ng staff is not aware ofany major existing parking problems in this vicinity.
2- _ The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretationand enforcernent of a specified regutation i.s necessary to achreve compal:-bility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or toattain the objectives of this title without grant of special privi.lege:
we feel that quality lodge space is an important goal for the Town,
and. that, in actuality, no ad.ditional generation of cars may resurtfrom this proposal . The number of units is not changing, ano thisis an important. factor in determining the potential ior increasedparking problems. Also, the architest has made a new proposat forarangi-ng .the parking spaces in a more space-efficient manner to
accommodaLe more spaces in the existing rot, our opinion is thatno special .privilege woutd result in approvjng the request.
3' The effect of Lhe reguested variance on lighL and airn distributionof _population, transportation and tr:affic faciiities, public facj-litiesand utilities. and prrblic safety:
As stated above, no effects upon distribution of population is foreseerbeca-use the n.'rmtrer of unit,s is notibeidg increased, No compoundingof parking problems in the virrage is foreseen lrith the grantingof this variance.
Such other factors.and criteria as the Commissi-on deems applicable, _"the proposed variance:
The proposal is not located in ccr, and thus is not subject to revievrby the PEC under the Village Desgin Guide P1an. The exlerior alteratio:tswill go to the Design Review Board. if the planninq and EnvironmentalCornmission approves the parking variance.
4.
to
. l I chEistiania - : - flao
, FINDINGS:
. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the followinqfindings. before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance wilt not constitute a grarit ofspecial privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in ;the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to thepublic healtho safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propert.ias'or i-mprovements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for the reason that the stricl: orliteral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regul-ationwould result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardshii>inconsistent with the objeclives of this title
j\*
MINUTES OF
I{E}4BERS PRESENT
Gerry White
Ed Drager
Dan Corcoran
Gaynor Miller
.Tohn Perkins
ilim l"lorgan
Roger Tilkemeier
o
PLANNING AND
August 25,
ENVIRONMENTAI CON.ISSION1980 3:00 P-M.
COT]NCTL PRESENT'
'none
S?AFF PRESSNT
Peter Patten
Jim Rubin
Dick Ryan
Bebsy Rosolack
'Dan Corcoran moved to approve the minutes, seconded, by Ed Drag;er,vpte was unanimous.
2.Exterior Modi-ficati.on to ttre r,ionsheaci Goiciota Bu-i-ld.in
Jjm Rubrn presented. the project as explained in the memoranrluur andstated that the staff recommenced approvar. B. J. Britton, ornryrer ofA Place on Earth, -shor'necl drawings and clescribed the snow pir.d highin the vrj-nter in front of the Uuifaing. He menbioned that the tvio storefronts were conceptual , that there !/ere rro tenants as yet. Discussi-onfollowed concerning the fact that the barrier in front of the buil<iingseparated the building from the malr, and that it was so wide that itlacked people perspeciive. rt vras felt that this; modi-fication r.ras needed.for the r-,ionshead commercial exposure. Dan corcoran moved to approve,subject to the conditions noted. in the stafi i"g"it, Ed Drager seconded.the vote was unarrimous.
t Set,back variance tq build a d.eclc on Irot v.villaqe 7th
Jim Rubin presented the projec! and, after expl.anatio:-r, stated thaethe staff recomrnendea aeniai. because no hardshj-p existec.. Ei}een schillin,explained the dr-ar^rings further, and po.rnted out that a ne.ighbor (Davj_s)was given a variance to extend, a cleck and bui-l-cl a garage. Further,neither of her 'eigirbors objectec, and t.he oLtr*t. orrrlel of herdge,tex wrote a leLter rcqueitit g that Eireen be arrovred to build onthe I{est in orcler not to-intrucJ on his pririacv. shq poin.Eed out thatthe reason the deck lras not propos;ed for the blck was to save the treesthere, and because the site vras-steep, Discussion forlov,,ed about thefact that there is no- neighbor to the west bccause it is an avalanchearea' and will .never be occupied,, thererore won't impa-t ,rrr1,or.rr"-
Roger Tilkemeier moved to approve this variancc,r, John pe::kins seconrle,{and all voted for approval except for J-tm l,Io::gan who abstained *rr,t'^ii"'Dn:.9er rrho voted agai-nst app::ovil because he iel.t no hardship existea.
Q2e!i!:-tr @er' Peter Fatten pre.sentec tire reqr.resL explaining that it r^ras Dot in ccl.PaulJohnston meut'ioned that Ctrere was a past parking ugr*.*,,11t betweerntlic Cirristian.ia Conclos, the VA, an<l chateau Ctrlistianial nog.r Tilkemeier
, .-l pdc uinures - 8/25O- page 2
said'that he wasnrt aware of an1' agreenrent with the Christiania Conclos,but.that the agreement was wiLh the christiania Lodge, VA and the Kendallresidence. PauI added that on11' one space has been deecled to one condo.He went 9n to explain that the units he wanted to convert were verysmall and also that 3 units had. only showers. The pran was to reduce9 units to 6 larger units, thus impioving the guest rooms, and change2 y"-ttf -on the- ground level to housekeeping quarters and storage. .Tohnasked, if a parking variance was needed.. others did not see the needfor a-parking variance., expecially in light of the fact that there maybe a letter verifying the |arking-agreement. peter and Dick felt thatit may be good to give a plrking variance so the applicant rvourd.n'thave to come back igain. -otheri felt that since paur- wasnrt und.er atime duress, he dj-dn?t need, a vote now.. Ed Drager moved that consj-dera-tion of the variance be postponed, and Roger T. seconded. The voteto postpone consideration r+ai unanimous.
5. Vail Associates Cond.itional Use. permit to place
for theon Lhe Upper Golden peak Tennis Courts
Peter Patten presented the study and mentioned that it was the samerequest as last year' and the stafr reeommended approval . Discussionfollowed about the.parking staIls cuL into the bank irlegally, and thefaet that the parking stails had been there 2 or 3 years. glri, Halnedsaid it was vA's intention to fix up the bank beyonh b.he parking. andthat_Lhe parking rvas supposed to be'for trr".ra!"-personner. Requestyas.fgr-one year at a time, until such time as VA will bu-ilc1 peimanentfacilities for smaLl worfd. Tom had a letter from pat Dodson inclicatingan agireement with the Recreation District.
Dick Allis of Manor Vail spoke to say that they lvere noL ba.sically opposed
!? !L"-:!ructure.' nor to smarr ir'orldl but was lo::cerned about the amounror:farr+g 3nd the spsed of sorne of the traffic in tha_t area. ire alsomentionqd-the inpact on his parking. He asr<ed for a speed b*mp. cerryWhite fel{: thai: the council would read these rninutes an<l- recei-ve thecomnents. Diek felt the need for some sort of trad.e-off since he retthe shi crub use 4 pari<ing spacesi. He felt, that it was tire--onrv-partof vail that has retained. ilrL character tha{: vair started out to be.
Dan corcoran moved to approve the conclitionar use pernit srrJrject tothe conditions noted in-Ltre staff repor-u. Ed, Dra-ger seconcled. ald thevote was unanimous with Roger t. abslaining.
6.Setback Vari.ance t--o build an eidition onto an existin re si-clenceon Lot 3 Block .1 Va'i-I ltleadows Srib v1s.10ll F_;_1i.r:
temporary structure1980-Bl ski season.
Peter patten presentccl the staff fi.ndings an<l tl.re staff reconnrend.al:io1of denial . lilark Donald.son sho'ec1 plrotoi of various s;ides, sayinq thaelJtt ploj"cLcd aciclilion woulci impact Lhe site the reast. The discussionthat followed quesLioned the reiso:r fo:: putting tire gar.age in -,hat positio:or in Lhat place, and it rrras genererly rert tirit tne-gar;g"-.."ia'u*moved a little to keep it niLhin the ietlrack.
Ed Drager moved for clenial, seconCc,J b1, Roger Tilkenreiet:, arrd, the votefor dcnial vras unanimous
75 south trontage road
yail, colorado 81657
(303) 476_7000
April 8, L9A7
offlce of communlty dcyelopm€nl
Mr. John perkins
P.O. Box 266Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Christiania Lodge
Dear John:
In order for the Christiania Lodge to construct moreaccommodation units, a request for a variance of d.ensity rnust beapplied for. The PA zone allows for 25 units per acre, and theChristiania Lodge property contains .365 acres. .:eS x 25 _ 9units which are allowed on this property. Since the christianiaalready contains rnore than 9 unilsr- it is considered anonconforrning situatj_on.
I am not sure if a parking variance would be needed, but wewould study the parking situation at the tirne a density varianceis requested.
Sincerely, n,4.i"^/./ f ,r'' /^ //'J-h1 ,Lb["4a-I'Betsy dosdlackPlanning Technician
oo
75 soulh trontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476_7000
April 3, L9B7
Mr. John perkins
P.O. Box 266VaiI. Colorado 81658
Re: Christiania
Dear John:
At the prelininary hearingDesign Review soaid had tfle
oo
offlce ol communlly development
of the Christiania remodel , thefollowing concerns:
l-. The stairway on the south must be addressed regardingraili.ngs and landscaping.
2. The gable on the south would be better plain.
3. A model would help visualize the addition.
4. A roof plan should be subnitted.
I. will l.<1ow bV Monday whether or not the addition of anotherstory will have !" S9 through pEC. fn ord.er to schedule you forthe April 1-5 Design Review ioard rneeting, please subrnit al-1changes by April _i-0 to give us tine to ieview the changes. ff,on the other hand, you wi1l need to go through pEC, we willdiscuss another sched.ule.
ff you have any questions, please feel free to cal1.
Sincerely,
/ Jerr 1Betsy Ro6olackPlanning Technician
of oo
APPLICATION DATE: 2q mopc,|I IQb-]
DATE 0F DRB MEETII'IG' t arpatL tlD-)
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION t,JILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-applicatjon meeting with a plann'ing staff member is strongly suggested to
determ'ine if any additional information is needed. No application will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator).It is the applicant's respons'i'bility to make an appointment with the staff to fjnd
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE applica-tion will streamline the approva'l process for your project by decreasing thb numberof condit'ions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resol ved before a bu'i 1di ng perm'i t i s i ssued
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: cil.pTSnANIA I.€E**e tt)IsHEs TD ,Ast2; ts?b s.F.
l"lr,tr.toer (egs,u cnlne wrr*nw) **a s.r. eenreer parn /nea,e ulurmcrr)
oltFtcb, d l-oBF+/) e sE A.lp F{-@ as oFFt€. r r-ap[Jc,|3 .t p.h.rrutr(3?!.5 GEEAr)
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Addres s
Legal Description Lot 2 Block 2 Fil inq FtESI-
Zoning !a.lax, aaa*rrroltrcU
C. NAME OF APPLICANT: h;T- ooltxrsroFl
Address
D. NAME OF
Address
E. NAME OF
Si gnature
Address
F. DRB FEE:
VALUATION
telephone 4rE-gAl
APPL ICANT 'S REPRESENTATIVE : ..bTT+-I IV\. EEEIF}S
tel ephone q44-4ca)
The fee will be pa'id at the time a building permjt is requested.
FEE
telephone 4t--9.1.
stake the site
be removedvisits the
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$ so.oo
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant mustto indicate property lines and build'ing corners. Trees that wjll
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRBsite.
$ o-$ 1o,ooo
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ .500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ Over $1,000,000
2. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetingsof the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. People who fail to appear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ i shed.
ll LIST OF MATERIALS oo
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P
llcrfEL t-ctDfae.
The following information is required for submittal by the appficant to the Design Review
Board before a final approvai can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Roof
Si di ng
0ther llall Materials
_-w. slrAEEs
t-.-EaEP,b 4{ Ecllat{' "(o" 'b"'to" es$lbcrt\ M.E.
€trt C.-o cFF rrllrtts= M.Er -
Fasci a
Soffi ts
f'J'i ndows
llindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chi mneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
B. LANDSCAPING: Name
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
of Designer:
phone:
Botanical Name
l?'s. cEbFE, *rl-bEc^oEnfi\re, crtr rYl.E.
*4( FLYrrJooc> M.e.
E|trfl-lulo @Fr1 ylA.B
W, b*s
P.s. cepsp. eenv u.g
u"urp srkklE 4 crr-*s *6 h .E- M.ts
Fl /b.
Lt /b.
N/A
h{ /b
ttlo oE Wtulll- % pE L^crcF*Efo
Quan i ty Si ze*
EuEreCzeE€Ff {€EES
cLt t{,Et treaEett{
Common Name
t
for conifers.
(over)
*Indicate caiiper for deciducious trees.Indicate height
SIEGAL REMODEL
ADJACENT PeqlERrI-oliIIERE
Christiania Lodge
Paul Johnston
iia n. Hanson Ranch Road
Vail , Colorado at657
Vi11a Va1ha11a Condo ' Assn '
Same as above '
Tivoli Lodge
Bob Lazier
Box #627
Vail , Colorado 81658
Mi11 Creek Court Assoc'
Arthur G. BishoP & Co'
3O2 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail , Colorado'81657
Town of Va11
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Lot D-1, Block 2 Vail Village 5th
Vail Associates
Box 7
v.ir, colorado 81658
Red Lion Inn - Commercial
iii"rt."a N. Brown, Jeff SelbY'
Charles Rosenqursr
Box 1528vrif, Colorado 81658
Red Lion Inn Residential
Edwin C. Whitehead
66 Vista Drive
6i""n*i"t, Connecticut 06830
,\r.l : f' I I
t-f.-dcr'-* L ftvr 5 II o'n'ru
,'".1u nil \,r.,[ \L,.^ [1',,,
",l.'ltr llo\11\\"'/
I V
'r zrtr'J''
S-"' -\tu ' 1 tt-
6^ l. '+t \L--'
')
oz
ts
=t
UJc
oo
oro(\l
a
IJJ
UJu-
F
=E
lrJ
o-
"'-;tfil,f'Ft
(0
@
=f,
d!!5
=
(o(.'
lr.JIF
lo
trt!
z
oJ
uJ
l6lyrIFxl>
El='.n | =zl )
=lc0Ol.!<1."2lzzl7
i(J
o)
o()
.9
E(t)
o
g)
6
q)
o
E
uJz
Eo
ul-Foz
J
uJ
U)
=
l!
ulz
Bo
c;
o
6o
-c
c(g
o
o
f
=o
E
o
=cl
E
o)
o
='t
o)
lo
a;
F
o.c
o
olc
o
o)
o
U'
.2
-c
a
fo
o
4;
3(E
o(!
at,
($
o
c
'-o
-(g(oO
Eo
pF
l. .:(Ei
-(!EF6tra.e
;o--cO#
s.=?=o>,(!=
(5X
:o
Eq:EEo0,o(It
I
a
o)
c
()
(E
<,,
Eoq)
o
(E
=cx,
(5
oo
c,
o
Lr,sf
oo
Lr)sl
=
=E
UJc
z
6
=
YoluIoz
Jo-
.J
E
LU
tr
oz
co
=f
c
J
2
I()
rtJ
=
u,l
lLl
z
tr
UJ
u.i
o
3
uJ
uJ
z
6
|.lJ
tru,
o-
UJ
o-
2
LIJ)
X
r-
utg)
U'
UJ
tIJu-
=
=E
uJo
J
FoF
z
J
J
IIJJ
uJ
z
=J
9z
c)
IJJ:
NOlrvnlvA
J
I
J
'1
(
+
(
a
T
n
YE
=TLo
z.o
Fo-
G
8
UJ
-
e.
IIJz
UJ
=>E
L
=@N
zz
Fo- A;a
=66Fr6Zl,r- <oo-
E8
H(\
I
I
I1l.l
?l1llBl-{ elqotolt!l
I,-l
JSIqol
Jclql
.t''l:l .al
rl€l
1..l
z
E
LL
tr
o-
o&o
UJo-
ao-
UJ
J
z
E
z9t-
t
uJFJ
=tuz
I
I
l
q
a
UJ
5q-t!(E
tr
oz
I
I
I
I
(!)tz,
9z
do3tr
U)Fzlz
tr
5
I
lu.l
ozg
o
z
F
m
ti{(-)r-e{
C)
Cf,
(oo
<tr{
lllFo
cDoazo
Fo-
UJY
IJJ
dI
oF
F
Etu
o-
tto
o-o
C)
uJFoz
uJF
o
z
o=ze
=z
o-- I
dt
2?1-- ?r.J-
=HE
!tr!
=
=ru
t!o
59E<o-l60EoB9It irieEE
=>=uJ-E h=(, +:.'i.':x>c!
E 66
I \tnE XO_E X>t q*
o-itttr
llJ
F
z
!
t!
(-)
t-(J
Lr.lJ
r.lJ
z,
FUI
-o
i,j
=z
.--')
I
I
I
l-
l"
I
)v\rq
6i
sj>
Eo
c
{J
aAc-co
5(d
a-
r{
=4
olzl
ol
UJI
1t
al>l
bl
zl
=lotFl
I
=l(ul
=l.l
I
=.1ol
uJl
5l
<l>l
LLIol
zl
3lolFI
I
I
I
Iol-l
olttll
1l
<l>l
u-lol
fl
tlIItltll"ll-lt(5lI UJIllltall>lI u-lloltzl
EFI
I
I
Iol
=.1(9l
uJl
1l
;l
Pl r
<F(r()
IIJ <ZEt!F<42o()
>Yg?zE:Fd6
z
-t-
TIJ
=
E.
F
Fz.
=
\JZ
F
=E
lrJ
o-zo
F(J
EF(nzo
C)
NET
IEl.Jlu,Iv)IE+
(L
o
F
at,
!
E(u
o
l
.i
qJ
rugJz
g)!:
uJ
o-
J
zo
FUJFo-L<>oruF_r
Ittl
)F
tL
cc
u
o-Ifl
9l6t
:<
o
=o'z
\'t'*
E>E
furS
^il-
ta
ILu
I* lllt^ltll-l
<l
Ftl
otl
<lt
^tl
l;
;
P
=l<i
oo
3to
l2o
F-
g)
I
leto
I
,YJ
I
I
I
I
J
ri
!-o
-ao'=
:x
toJ
rQ.,
E
()
+J
q
=L!
,ro
i.*
,<,
'=
L
.lJ
Eo().
q-
Or
Ivtt
v7a
t
C\J 'I
=(JJ'-
: .o.
J la-
(JI
o!- t+(Fc
Lr,
u0
(u_J C\
oF
tsE
LIJ _cr.\
"*Nl
E,\t\
P!u,\F25x
f-
LLI
.J
lt-
O.
r.lJo
lJ-lt!z.
t/,
=tr
=!.J.lJ+
O(
LJ- -
It-t-l>
LlJ
u_
(r,I(LIil
;;
r/,:<
E
x
r!l_t
t-l:.1
=lLrJ I*l
s*-l
IFI
=l- t',ll
-r ll
14- ll
Iurfat) !
J
c,
o
J
u
at)
F
z
z
J
.lt
(9
z
I
I
I
I
I
Irca
JF
l.^z
l=to
tz
I
I
I
tJ)
trJ
UJrL
UJ
J
F
F
x
F
tr.to
CL!u
z
(J
ct
i
ttr,
z
a
UJ
UJ
z
F
rU
CN
UJIL
F
t!
o
\J
\ll
=F
l!
z
zQ
EZ
d8
-t-f<
z=zoF+
couJ>
z
I
E
z
EllJ
F-rC!NOtlYnlvA
LJLJLJ
\
z
IL
I
I
I
I
5 lu
UlF
F
Fz
C)I
z
o
IU
Tt/
bl
ZI
xl
z
ct
E
-J
<F
uJ<
oz
lv
vN\tJ
g
-lrUlt_- |'t]
UJ
z
olzl
.;l
HI
--rl
<l
?lE'
zl
3l
9lFlEo
(J
Fzoo
z
o
UJ
JI
5lttlol
zl
3lol
.il
zl.l
sJl
J'
<l>l
(Ll
ol
zlilolFIE
F()
Fz
c(n
16 7/.
| 1.,./|| |ttt IL/IDAIE llllY/d'2 JOBNAME
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
!'r s..h ^ ,".irr..
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
,,tv' J /,_+ lt
;(neenoveD .,,:',tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
PERMIT NUMBER OF PBOJECT
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
T] UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr BOUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
(nouen -tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
-
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
CORRECTIONS:
oor= //- /'7'-/"l rNSpEcroR
..\
EST '
lPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
' '/r.l
TUES WED THUR
JOB NAME
,{9i o3 'l
a
, INSPE_CTION_ RFOU
r-.-. ,i TOWN OF VAIL
a/\ /i I r 1J-t i, .\,
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.O FOUNDATION i STEEL
tr FRAMING tr
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
F ROUGH ..tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr\UPPLY AIR
-
tr
tr
tr
CONDUIT
FINAL
E.
tr FINAL
tr REINSPECTION REQUIREDDISAPFBOVED-t:'_ffeenoveo,
CORRECTIONS:
-/ /_'/ --.' i./ - ,f / l:r i '- -r ! t.' INSPECTOR
}J
cr)(v
Oc)
u.lFooo-zo
F0-ulv
lrJo
9.',-coFol
=-Eu.l roqr{bt>€Eqo9rl
HFroEzo
z(,9z4
=z
a-,P
,.*-5\., \J
=
=Fe= ;'i'i ()
A;E
tr
EIu
IIo
uloz
oo
t-
E
E
JFUJ;h=:(tso- uJ
=LOL9oiutX(Lx>Er-)
J.tr
uJ6
F
co
Eco
o
6'at
.E
3
E
EI
o
ts
=Elrlo.zoFofE
6zo(J
ft]I
o
=t
=E
uJo-
.7w_ 56/8////
IH
l6
I
I
I
I
I
I
t_,,
r<td
IE
I
I
tu,,Ft<ro
I
I
I
I
lo.
t?
laz
l=to
lotz
J
at
=ZZtLo oo
F^AZI q ;onl6E
l/,(.,dZt-O9onlJZXlr<t1 0-J:-rltxEi6 siq 6da\ta
EIqlllqEl''1.9
If,
(t)
J
=F
uJ
Etr<-oE
J
c)+.t
L-c
z
j
q-
Fo
EL
C')
Lr-
G'
C]
+)
ii
=z
.Do--)
I
ILl-
I
J
EI
q
:a
=o
tltlll,ll"tl
tdI rIJlI03tqtcrt<
EI 3E
lrtl
l.llzlI cil
Irltall>l
t5l
del Et
tl=llol I'5t
I(,I Iot I+rl Iot Il-t .lo-l Ollzl
=l dl'- | "-l.=l ilcl >l(Ul |!lOI OIlzlEAtLLI FI F
tltll.llol| =.1| (tltulI ccl
lil
l3l
el el Ei
uJ
J
uJF
IIlltltltltlldll=lt(,lI uJl
t5lt<ll>lI ll-lt9
Et :lrl-l Fl
I
I
I
Idl>l
ntl
CEJ
JI
alilol
Zt ,.tBI :Ol rrrFI F
=E
lJ-
(ts
UJz
=
LlJF
E
<Ft<)
I.JJ <zF
I.IJ F6Zo
5P
t<i.' t;:iF",2:oro
rn R
zt-
E?zE
d6
-) tY
6P?a)
=$Y,z>U
E
Ei
=IIYttr|!, z
O
<Oo14u] H-Jna!
x>< >< xx>..
l_
l<lo
I
$-
ll
\
<nt!
IL
t--
UJ
I
I
I
I
lE
IPt<
IFl9zl=
t2
t=IY
<4
UJF
2
oz
J
.6
z
N
J
z
(J
lr,l
=
z
:
J
F()
u,
Y
2
=
UJ
z
(D
ts
lJ.l-'q+t
bHlrJ<.o
Zt-/'t<:z)a,ry
oFX€.o.!
iF
#l
H=tdEEI*-al
160li u:l
d---l3-,- '
YJFD.
o
o
cl
@T'
E
co(,
o
q,
i_
'o)0)
Cn
\-/
(-
o
nrrn
z
oPz4
tDQ
=z
dP
,J,"i6
;sFJ(Ji
=uJxo|rJEr-J-UUIILJ
lc
lgl-ltr, | .o | ii I
;t *tsl;lslilr
$/frtitfi
\Jt=
.\ll t!
' Jl1. \/l<
l=l> rEl> -
=uJ
z
E+E5F(rgo.i>xoYE5furfo-(J>c,r-O
J
UJz
UJ(J
I
I
I
I
I
i
+
6'
I
I
I
I
I
Il.,,t z
u
.il=
:6fl ;
\L
e
ol!E
oz
3 ll *8 | EE f-'X
JE0F ll sp | 3F
5F il F3 I iF ilg i
HF fi i3 | $E [$ S
,'r:''.,t'-
Q'r, ,,
",at'i' ,'it' ,y'! '
r
i'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A part of Tracr E, Vail Vil1age, Fifth Filing, a subdivisionrecorded in the office of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk andRecorder, being more particularly described as follows:
- Beginning at the norfhr,,/est corner of Lot d. Block 2. Vail-Vi11age' First Filing, a subdivision recorded in the office of theEagle county, colorado, clerk and Recorder, thence along the southerlyright-of-way of Hanson Ranch Road S51o 35rW 17.lB fee!; thence
s30'01 tE 37.49 feer; rhence N59"59'E 17.00 feet Eo the wesEerly lineof said Lot d; thence along said westerry line N30"01 't,I 40.00 feetto the point of beginning, containing 660 square feet or 0.02 acres,more or less,
Dat e
I
. ''' ') ';') ,/ t)
E, Stenmark
Colorado L.S. 16844
'L.
box lfi)
yail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
department of community development
June 7, 1982
John Perkins
P.0. Box 266
Va'i I , Col orado 81658 RE: DRB Submittal of 6-2-82
Dear John:
0n June 2, 1982 the Design Review Board approved Sarah's Deck
Addition and Beer Garden. The Board suggests that brick pavers
be used jn the beer garden area; they also suggest that potted plants
be provided to enhance the ambiance of the garden. Not wanting
to discourage the fulfillment of a good idea, the DRB enunciated these
items in terms of suggestions, not requirements.
Si ncerely,
-,/,ft /-?--'.-_
Jim Sayre
Town Planner
JS:df
Project Application
o"r" /-7 ffi?r /"?63,
project Name: 1anri, 't Crrh, Adltibn i.i,-j &ee,r fu/,*-.t
ziLaa*.
-,lsrtrt ln ,Psb.t-,47e *W5Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
''*/oo/las *7e, - Se&/
?#.m' P*r,Ltng F.*. &r*, '&6
,.r'p.,/, 6 - *lAS&> 47:,- bStS
/'j
Legal Description: Lot #etocx 4 rlins /{, Zone
-
commenrs: ,ry -z x z:.,t '6 s-e,# ,-/ e" y'a an .g-x.tq&t??
,**4, Sr at:'a dgl . r</.ezt {ca.a- .aez*Aan- la
Design Review Board
Motion by:I a\1,,-\
Seconded by:
HT\4{.DISAPPBOVAL
Summary:
ba$fi[:$ Aat;* ) gutJ J g4.)Gt-l -t tA t 4:r€/'- ;f4-AsJ{xV t r"."1 1Efi{:a-an\ R}'f !" S+t}ru{) 4E-
f,.zpturnti E:, Ct,.\ fr. ft7 l f;x|t !:_ AO jAL-fttT- -tts
E statt Approval
-i/ I t. LIST OF MATENIALS-
u.iLe ?.tilNF 1qS2 *
NAIIE OF {ROJECT snnn's orcr nNo sEE
LECAL DESCRIPTION D----LOT 2------BLOCKVAIL VlLLAGE 1ST------+'ILING
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECl'ApprTroN oF A pEc E-
FENCING oI AN EXISTING fARKING AREA
The following information 1s required for submittal by the Applicantto the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given.
A. ) BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other lYa11 Materials
CoLor
TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING
<r - 7t
Fasci.a
Soffits
Wlndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck RaiLs
Flues
Flashings
Cblmneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
Type o{ llaterla].
N/A
1X4 V/OOD SLAT SIDING TO MATCH
N/A
114
N/A
N/A
2X6 REDWOOD CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EX-
@
N/A sc - 721
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
B.)PLANT MATERIALS N/A
dscaping Materialsr)
Conrnon l{ame
(Vegecative, Lanand Ground Cove
iricluding Trees, Shrubs,
SlzeBotanical Narne
t
1_
I
q00 s.F.
c.)OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES(Retaining Walls, Fences, Swirmning Poo1s, etc.)
(PIeasei Speclfy)
ADDIT1ON OF OPEN SPLIT RAIL FENCING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
EXIbTING PAR(ING LoT To MATCH EXISTING sPLIT RAIL FENCING.
..
RE-USE dT EXIST|IruE VERT]CLE WOOD SLAT FENCING TO CLOSE
r ! i i,
OFF.i PARKING iAREAJFOR SUMMER USE ONLY.ii',J:l
t
Botanical Name Cormnon Name Qugnrltv S ize
cp.outto covrp.; z/4'r wASHEn cRAVFt ovFR EXisTTNG AspHALT
crlr NArr\/F qANTTSTONE FIRFpt acF/BARBFQUE plT SEE SAMPLE
Macerlals Continued
t3/ L //b
o >\- ./) '<3Y.-91 c s<
Iflr\\I c LaiRr
i3:E=<ts 3 <:
< i zt-
:8il
Ir-.5i_<C(,
Y
3ZZtL
h o- 4=x r =Yc 9 6F
ooEZs-()OoglQzXrr- <o+ 2L!:?c!{ii-x
i(\lo
I.-+q,q
"lrHq-1
vl3olgq..{Id+rl
I<alldi?qcl
l=l(,q
'q*6; oP
:99
126E
<F-oazOs
=oq5P38Sn<68
z
;i.i<;c-<(, o-
Pgilcotq$
itr9<oz
'JlZ=
t4ot
C:l
I
I
I
I
I
oz
L
=culo-
oz
Fo
uJ-)o
.L
drlNr{rl
".1
LUF
o
Jz
z
.n9
=rmo
=z
dP
."i6
>Y*=
^FS
dd=
o
o
o
o!
!r-E=o;()i
€lu-r.O
oiE>EFF
CL
rDt
o
Fo
=E,F(nzoO
nnt]
--3
z
.J
u-
6
I
Ic
IF
(l)
o
(tJE
(I,
.ci
.d
vt
!
ui
z
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
slurl
jl
<l>l
.L
FF;i
al
u.Jl
ololjl
=l
lltltlilqlanl8l3l
orl
=l'Ft I.6t I.|-,l (4l11 s/.llf, d-lot tt
=l xl-t <l
=l
Jltr|atrlEl
t-
=
lrz
t
F
Fz
z
I
O
LU
=
<FEO[!<zE
o(J
F
EFz
J
EF
t!
J
LU
>Y
=#:)FJZ('l-O
O
nEt]t
X
-t:Ci,J!- i_
:; ! !4:
-i ^ .)::,r
:<:z:itz;-:; ! <;:
FFF3N
-.:?--lil;i7<t <
li.,<eo> *m<ar'j!,:;cr<rc<]..:
U)ulut
l1-
F
E
L-I-J
d-
!_
&
o-
(1z
:
l
ol
(J
I(-)
c5
=crl
:5:)
a-
Io:
FO
Iz
:1:o
e(
ott
t
z
a
o
ii
7
i::.{
'-l,l
o:
F
o
l'-
(Jz
:lol
NOttvnlvA
zz
io-AXl;co
u) a5Z5-
<)z
t!<oo-,', :f
t()
iC\i
z
F
l
c
f,
c
LU
o-
F
L{.7
ZIt:o
zz
S--A==V' IJ
'L-85-R
= f ;qE
E s + 96au,tr(JuruJ<OZ
E Z ^12t.Hq: = trYf
:HZiQ: < g + HHd,r+6tr{3coEo6oo(Jrz<J
Fzf
;
o
(J
z.
tr
J:az
;
F
FIo
3
Ll-t
F
z
'l
?
G
ll'
z
IIF
z
et-
F
rd
f
z
:30Y()
,-t.Jqul
Ll
r-i
I
I
I
oz
a
l1lF
(1z
zc
(]
.J
=zz
t--
ul-l
o-
Jz
z
=<cnoEZ
(L LL
i=/n / \ Y
=11-r --: trJ.6d=
Er_rr.r
Lrntr
q)
qtt
f,r.F=E t\.o ii-
OLL-o
ts >-.
(!
oE
HEg'
Lrl '
fL.'
z.o
F(J
:]EFazo(J
lel
*
F\
tUF
o
I"nl
'I
z
t!
:<
J
F
J
ni
z
mt
5
:
t--nq
-n'.:
<-/
=
.J-
Y
d2
-z
')
.d
ul
-sl
rat
ul.
fl,l
EI
<l
I
=l
;-s
..'rf
Io-
f<l))
I>-l
O]
n-1
-:
g
u.l
+'f
,<
1
=
tr
-p
N
*
a.:
E
o
=
l'
;t,1
2
tlJE
t-
4
=tr
oo
aE
l
LL
Eud
U>
a g
UI
o
a
=
s
caoo
=
g
:c
o-
=C)
(r
Lt",z
3
)"
Fo
LUL'r
(J
.<F
tlJ <ze.
AZ
<o
-<
*l
Zr-
5#
)z(l-o
C)
<^
=F7Q;<
=3
E ir*)- (v
FF-<(J(50
UJ LU
JO
Project Application ;
Project Name:
Project Description: _
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block , Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Revlew Board
l
I
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
Oate:
-
Chief Building Officiat
HOWARD gTRAUS
xgEFKtqoS 385 Gore Creek
x)(4nlryiEsxiuf [xEJ€orx6llrr
VAIL COLORAOO 81657
Dr.
Flctg?3BlD hotatttol|a! ENotxrEn TEL. aoo -X.#d(lGXX
47 6-4827
october 28, 1980.
Planning Cornmission
Municipal Building
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Gent lernen:
I read in a recent edition of ',The Vail
Trail" that the ohiners of the Christiana building
have requested permission to build 2800 square
feet of floor space on the top of their present
building. The cornment in the newspaper was that
no views of the mountain would be obstructed.
Additional height ro the Christiana
would in fact obstruct the view for the owners
of the apartments in our building and the adjacent
houses.
Yours Eru1y,
,"
lt
l'
Project Application ,^," ?/7/go
Project Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
f"r'rNUrBs or pLtlNG AND ENVTR'NME*'* .ot?,ro*
MEI4BERS PRNSENT
Gerry White
Ed Drager
Dan Corcoran
Gaynor Miller
John Perlcins
Jim [torgan
Roger Tilkemeier
August 25, 1980 3:00 P-M.
COUNCII, PRESENT
none
STAFT' PRESENT
1. Approval of minutes of Auqust 1I
Peter Patten
rlim Rubin
Dick Ryan
Bebsy. Rosolack
1980.
'Dan Corco::an moved to approve the minuLes, seconded by Ed Dragier.
vpte was urranimous.
2" Exte::iqr Modificatio_*_lp ttfg Lfqnshgan Go lllg-,-
Jim Rub'in presented thr: project. as expl;rined in the mefirorarr(l,un ernd
stated thaL the sLaff r:ecommended appror;al. B. J. Brit.Lon, or'*'ner of
A Pl.ace on Earth, sho\.,'ecl drawings and descrj.l:ed. the sno\'r pil-ed trigir
in the v,lj..nt.er in front of the building. He mr:ni:j,oned tlrat the two stcire
f ront,s hlcre concep{-uai, bhat there were }1o t-enernls as yet. Discussion
fol-lowed concernirrg tire fact th.ai". the barrier in fr:onb of the buildinry
separaterl the buil-d.j-ng f::om the ruall, and fhat it r^ras so vri.de thai: iL
lacked people per:spectj-v=. It r,ras felt that thi".; moC,i"fi*at-i-on ivas needed
for the Lionshead comnre::r: j-al exposure" Dan Corcorarr nol'r:d" to s.pFrove'
^:r1-,: -.^.!- 'l-^ J-L^ ,...) rr,J J c,\-.,, L.!., ,-rr.J -:r:dj.ticrt,s: note d .in t.irc staf f rep(trt, f,t1 Dr.rge:; l,ecol'Idedr
tl)e vou;c was urrnniTaous.
$etback varience to hui-lrl a clcch on I.oL I Hl-l{. g V,Vi]..Laqe 7th
T.l * n,., 1--: -^"-r-r)rr'r l..ha nrfiin(-J- ^'^r -.rr, - -. " i i:r,r r;.f ..1,Fr,61 f |,21UJ.Ltl l\LI.'J.J.rr I,r-L L:i'Jljlt L!:L( Lrrt-. ir-!_!rJUL.e A!lt{p d.I l" tj! u,!r-',,.,rrat L.ILJ,L i) t-.1-\-r^ Lrru
the staf.i! reconrinencied denial because no lrai:dsh-i",':i ex:i-st-ed" Eii-e:cn Schillini
ex1>Iaineii the d:r:ar':ings frrrther, trn<l po-r-n-1-ed ci.tf i:ira.b a ne"ighbor (Davis)
I'ra s givet: a varj-ance to e:itencl a ciecli anr-i buj-ld a garrillTe. Iru:!:';l'!el:,
n()j thL.r <-:i her rtcigi.bor':; o).rjcct.lC, and I-i'c otlr,lr- o\\rii:i: tri. het:
ci-uple;< r'/rotc a J.ei:L.er:r:c<tucs.h'ing l.haL lJ-il-eren be allowed to bu:L-r-d on
the !'i'ei:t. irr r:rtlc.:'not to j"ntru'le on irj.s Frj-vacy. She poin'bed or-rt Lhai
Lhe r:ea..;ct-r. 'Lhe Cr.:i--.li ',,.'a ri nnL lll <.r g.rp p;u,6 f or: t-h* l>ack wils L.o r,;ave the trees
i-here, ancl because thc si-t-.e vnat sj stcrclj. i).i:;cutr,j-cn f ol.1ov,,ec1 ab*r-rt Lhe
fact tirat therr:. is r:o nei,ghbor: l-o 1-he l,ieFj.t; becauso it. :Ls an a'.r';i-La.nche
ar:ear a.ncl roil.I rici-g.,1' be crccupicii , {:her:ef ore \,lcn't impac L onloil.:: "
Roge:: '.tl:i.l-i;i:i*c j.er mcrrecl t-o apprc;rre tir:is rr;rr-i.a.ncr*, Jchn Pe::Jci-ns secondedn
arrd all vi> tccl f or app::r-rv a 1 exccrp i: f o:: J:i,rr l'lo-r:g;in i';ho ;'ibs{:;r:Lned iiiicl 8,1
Dralger ul:c vo Lec'i. ag;rinst-" app::ov;:.1- l:i:causc hr: f r:"t- i: no hi:--dl;hip c:x j-sled.
i Chr:i r:ti.a.nia Locict e L'.:.r:hin \I:l:i ance Lo A.lkr';i a 2&00 .qQ ft /irtli"tiot-i
I'(':.tel: Fai {-,<:n plo.,;r:nIed. the reqrrcr;t e;.;1>.1.;:.:r':ing t:}r;-i.. i f- v,'a.,s no.l, :i.n CCf .
Par-r1 .,rohnstt-o:: i:r*irt-. j-oncd t.ilat .L-]i,::.'re $ras .: Jr;:Ls'i; pa::kincJ aqrccnteir-i: betweem
tl:* ChrisLj.;.u-li-a Cr-:ndos. t:lte V1r. a;rd Ch:it'-r:i:..r Cir-r:'-i.sLiiinj.;r. Roger:1llj,l-liemeier
,' PEc Minutes - g/zs} page 2
said that he wasn't aware of any agreenrenl with the Christiania Condos,
but that the agreement was with the Christiania Lodge, VA and the KendalL. residence. Paul added that only ens space has been deedecl to one condo.
He went on to explain that the unit.s he wanted to convert were very
small and also that 3 units had on1.y showers. The plan was to reduce
9 units to 6 larger units, thus improving the guest rooms, and change
2 units on the ground level to housekeeping quarters and storage. John
asked if a parking variance was neecled. Others did not see the needfor a parking variance, expecially in lighL of the fact. thaL there may
be a letter verifying the parking agreement. Peter: and Dick felt thatit may be good to grve a parking variance so the applj-cEuit rvouldn't
have to come back again. Others felt that since Paul wasn't under atime dures$, he clj-dn't neeC a vote now.. Ed Drager moved that considera-tion of the Vari.ance be postponed, and Roger T. secorrde<l . The voteto postpone considcration vlas unanimous.
5. Vail Associates Con<litional Use. Permit to pl-ace tenlporary structureon the upper Golden Peak Teqn:l q Qogrtslqlliie 19q0:Br ski_se
Peter Patten p::eseirted the study and mentioned that it was the samerequest as last ycar, and bhe staff recornniended approval . Discussionfollowed abcut the pa::kincf stalls ci.ri: it:i-o the ba:rk i)-ieg;rl 1y, and thefacL that the parking statls had been there 2 r,tr 3 year:s" Tom lla::rredsaicl ii was VA's j.ittenLj-on to fj-x up the bank be1'ond'Lb.e f irrl<iirg, andthat the par:iring r.J,rs supposed to Jre for the race pe:rs<;nnel" Requ.est
rvas for one year 6.ti a Eime, until such tinre ers VA v,'i11 l:uitc1 pr:.,-:m.anentfacilities for Smal-l l{orld. Tom ha.d a l-etter from Pat }J<;cicon lncl,icatinqan aql:e{}ment with t,he Recreation ijistrict
Dick Allis of l.lanc,r Vail spoke to s.ly Lhat they r.rere not basicall-y opposeclto t.he structu::er nor to Srnail irlorl.C, ktr.it \ra €i coficerned. abcilt the amoun l:of traffic ernd the spced of sor,e cf the trailf:i.c in thert at:c:)a.. I{e alsomentioned the i"nrpcct on his parl:in,;. iie askrlcl i"er a speer'l Jrrr.rnp. . Ge::ryI{hite fel.t that the Councit vouli{::ead those ni.nlr-te.s a.nci;:ecei.vr: tirr:
coiTi:tionts" Dick felt. the need, for scir:re rior.t of trade-off si-rrce he let
t.he Slri Clul: use 4 parltiirg space!'," Ile ferlt tl:;tt'.it wcrs i:l:r-: only part-of Va:-1 that has i:c:'"a:i-tred t.ir.: cirar::acte:: thai:. Vr:i.t- s{:ar:'uc <} aut -Lo be.
Dan Corcor:an tnorzeci {-6 ;r.pp::6r,'e t}re concliti,ona]- u.sc perrir:i.L nii-b jec'l; +;c>
the conCitions troterd in the sLaff :..L-pori. llcL Dt:r.!jer gec.:i:nrj.r,,:d, ancl. {:he
vot-e was unanimou$ r.rith RE:ger T. abs;Lai.nincl.
6.[;a l:hacf. Var j at:,c': t o l>r.rir d an i:.cil j,ti.c!r o*{:o arr exisr+...ir:l ::e s:i-cicn.ceon Lol:,llr, Rl-t-:l:;l .l-i'tt: Lric,i,: s S i.'rl j,v;i-li.r:'I':- "L i.r-.. q .i..
Peter Patt.r'rtr prc serrr.l:cd th-e s'l.n.f f :f :i ndil-rgs; ail<l |lte staf f ::ec cnr:nen cla i: ic]nof ci.cn-ia1. Iia:r:h l)on.a.-Lds,rn sltoi'red 1:1.ro i..c,'s c:f r.r;,:r:.i e-;L1s :ii.11cg,. *ayilq th-;itthc p:ojcc{:cll ;rairlj.ij-c,tr r;ciul .i in.':rct L'r.rc :.:: tt: Lirr: Lt':l 9t " l.'h- d j-ruussion
1-hal- fol.lcwccl quesLjrrntrcl th,: rcaso:: i:o,': put"L;i.ng ther gil:i'.!;e :i n that- posiLi.<xor j.t: that pi.aceo ar:Ld- it \r.rsl qenL:l::11..v feti- tiut-.Lhe g,rnaEc ccr:1.r1 bcmorrr:d a f.it-t-i-e t-o Lc,cp it rvit.hin i:h*: srcr{:jrai:k,
Ed Draqer niorrcil fc:l t1cni.a.1, seccldcd b:' F.ogt=r-' Ti--lliemci-*r, i;.i:cl thc I'oL.e
f or r,r.crriaJ. lra E; utra,rr :i-:rioug
rl.-,^
,i,'_:.,,,, ,",,r, , ,,.,1 '. tO aO{,...',.'''. \'L ,' .,,'ToJ, ' PLANNING AND ENVIRoNMENTAL coMMISSIoN ,v,
i .ri . TFROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE; B/2L/80
iL
':' r.: ,\ REI Parking variance request for Paul Johnston to add a 21800 sq
'l ^ r* ft addition to the Christiania lodge located on parL of Lot D, Block 2,
r I VaiI Village 1st Fj-ling, in a Public Acconunodation (PA) zone district.':
I
..,. DESCRIPTTON OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
\\
The Ch::istiania is re-arranging and adding floor spaee in their 1od.ge.
No additional units are being created, just larger uniLs and some office
space for internal operations of the lodge. Building height is being
rd,ised in certain places, but nol so as to negatively affect view corridorsor to violate zoning retrict,ions
The parking situation for the Chrj-stj-ania has been the problem in thestudy of this proposal. Parking facilities for the Christiania existin two locations: A gravel lot across ttre street (I{anson Ranch Road) ,. and a small area West of the Lodge. Complications arise when the parking
requirements for the ChristianiaCondominiums, located East of the Lodge,are figured in, because they also use the lot across the street fromthe Lod.ge.
In the last few days, questions over the arnount of parking spaces lchichthe condos have a right to in the lot have arisen. If, as presented
by Mr. Johnstqn. the condos have a right to only one spot per unit,no parking variance would be needed by the Christiania Lodge for theiraddition. The Lodge is 3 spaces short when the new addition is figuredin along with the normal aflotment given to the condos accordinq tozoning (15 spaces), There are 9 condos existing, so if they only haverights to 1 unit, the Lodge makes up 6 spaces and needs no varlance.The Staff is requiring written proof of the parking arrangement withthe condos before the waiving of the variance is granted.
The memo is being written, and PEC is considering the matter underthe assumption that, at the time r:f the heari-ng, no rrrritten agreementis produced. The 3 space variance would be subject to the gl5r000
fee.
I
.Christiania - 2 - 8/2J?oo
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060Code' the Department of Community Development recommendsthe requested Variance based upon the followilg factors:
Consideration of Factors
of the Munj-cipal
approval of
l. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing orpotential uses and structures in the vicinity:
Vail Associates has indicated their possible d,esire to constructa lodge on the existing gravel lot. As a potential use, parkingfor the christiania complex would need to be taken care of at thattime in a sufficient nanner. The planning staff is not aware ofany major existing parking problerns in this vicinity.
2. - The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretationand enforcement of a specifiecl regulation is necessary to achieve compati-bility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or toattain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege:
?'1e feel that quality lodge space is an important qoal for the Torrn,and that, in actuality, no additionar generaLj-on of cars may resultfrom this proposal . The nrrmber of units is not changing, and thisis an important factor in d.etermining the potential for increasedparking problems. Also, the archi-tect has made a new proposal forarranging the parking spaces in a more space-efficient manner to
accommodate nore spaces in the existing lot. our opinion is thatno special privilege would result in approving the iequest..
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribut,ionof population, transportation and, traffic facilities, public facilitiesand utilities, and public safety:
As stated above, no effects upon distribution of population is foreseenbecause the ntrmber of units is notibeing increased. No compound.ingof parking problems in the village is foreseen with the graitingof this variance.
such other factors and c::iteria as the commissj-on deems applicablethe proposed variance:
4.
to
The proposal is not located in ccr, and thus is not subject to reviewby the PEc under the Village Desgin Guide plan. The exlerior alterationswill go to the Design Review Board if the Planning and. EnvironmentalCommission approves the parking variance.
Christiania-3-8
'i
FINDINGS:
oo oo
. The Planning and Environmental Commission sha1l make the followingfindings before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant ofspecial privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to thepublic health, safetyr or welfare, er materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for the reason that the strict orliteral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardshipinconsistent with the objectives of this title.
PUBLIC NOTICE
- NO?ICE IS HEREBY GMN that PauI Jotrnston
f,.o4Se has requested a Parking Variance for both the
ancl the covered parking requirement to a'Llow a 2'800
adilition on t}.e christiania lJodge. The christiania
located on Part of Lot -D, Block 2' Vait Village 1st
in a Public Accommodation (PA) Zone District'
- A coPY of the ProPosal is on file
Community Development between the hours of
MondaY through FridaY
TOVIN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMT]NITY DEVELOPMMiIT
Jim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
of the Christie
number of sPace
square foot
todge is
Filing and is
in the DePartment of
I : 00 A.l{- and 5 : 00 P.l{'
Sherman & Sterling
APublicHearingwillbeheldinaecor.dancewithSection
18.66.060 of the Vair Municipal code on Aug. 25, 1980 at 3:00 P-M-
beforetheTownofVailPlanningandEnvironmentalCommission.
SaidHearingwillbeheldintheVailMrrnicipalBuilding.
Mail-ed to:
Mi1l Creek Court Assoc.c/o Arthur Bishop and Company
302 Hanson Ranch Road
Chateau Christiania Condominiurn Assn.Rich Allen, Pres.
1512 Rolling Road,
Salisbury, Md. 21801
l,eewar{ Corporation
c,/o Strupp, David,
153 East 53rd St.
lif.ew York, L0A22
Vail Associates
Box 7
Vail
I
<c'i
o
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoTIcEIsHEREBYGIVENthatPaulJohnstonoftheChristiana
LoqgehasreguestedaFarkingVarianceforboththenumberofspaces
andthecoveredparkingrequirementtoallowa2,800squarefoot
addition on the christiania Lodge. The christiania Lodge is
locatecl on Part of Lot D, Block 2' VaiI Village lst Filing and is
in a Public Acconunodation (PA) Zone District'
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section
18.66.060 of the Vail l4unicipal Code on Aug' 1I' 1980 at 3:00 P'M'
beforetheTownofVailPlarrningandEnvironmentalCommission.
Said. Hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal- Building'
- A copy of the proposal is on file in the Department of
CommunityDevelopmentbetweenthehoursofS:00A.I't.and5:00P.}1.
MondaY through FridaY.
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP]'IB{T
Jim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail 'fuly 25' 1980'
{
I
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoTIcEIsHEREBIGIVENthatPaulJohnstonoftheCtrristiana
LodgehasrequestedaParkingVarianceforboththenumberofspaces
anilthecoveredparkingrequirementtoallowa2,300squarefoot
adcrition on the christiania Lodge. The christiania T,odge is
locatecl on part of Lot -D, Block 2' Vail Village lst Filing and is
in a Public Accolrunodation (PA) Zone District'
APublicHearingrn,illbeheldinaccordancewithSection
1g.66.060 of the vail Municipal code on July 28, 1980 at 3:00 P-u-
beforettreTownofVailPlanningandEnvironmentalCommission.
Said Hearing wilt be held in the Vail Municipal Building'
' A copy of the proposal is on file in the Department of
CommunityDevelopmentbetweenthehoursofB:00A.I{.and5:00P.1,1.
MondaY through Friday'
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMB'IT
Jim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
Published in'tbe Vail- Trail
llailed to:
MiII Creek Court Assoc.c/o Arthur Bishop and Company
302 Hanson Ranch Road
Chateau Christiania Condominium Assn.
Rj-ch Allen, Pres.
1512 Rolling Road,Salisbury, Md. 21801
July 11, 1980-
Leewar4 Corporationc/o Strupp, David,
153 East 53rd St.
Niew York, L0022
Vail Associates
Box 7Vail
therman a Sterling
Information on Christianiais 'in the Council Chambers
Parking Lot, Lot P-3, Blk 5-A, Vail Village 5thplan cupboards under "C"
t
Project Application
Project Name:
Project Description: _
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Zoning Administrator
7,ozz
fto
aI%o Ind.,lnc.
Manufacturers
lffn W€ct Evans Ave., Suite D
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Phone: 30$93+2163
Douglas A. Schyck
Execuiive Vic€ Presidenl
.w"
ffix
nYAl,4rfe
frs Fae laio,
CEtl/7,fr"€O 44d
Eeuor*O ft2 Lc'airl
$h+
€-b'klLjut+^l
e
\
\
/
lo'1'- ProjectApplication
Proiect Name:
Project Description: _
Owner Address and phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
ing Administratoi (1Chief Building Officiat
I
w.nfi,mn*:c"p.lm$Ny
August 29, L980
Mr. Paul JobnstonChristiania at VaiIP. O. Box 758Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Johnston:
As President of the Chateau Christian TownhouseAssociation, Inc., I am responding to your request forinformation. As an original owtei and presid;nt of theassociation, it is my opinion that the und.erstanding inregard to parking spaces was that each condominium wasentitled to one parking space in the lot across HansonRanch Rd., the lot shared with the Christiania Lodge.If I can be of any further help, l_et me know.
tA.A ./t!'/%Ul^---Allen -\-
RMA: tkm
Richard M.
?*^*"1 ,/8",9*r{*rhy Zrk* laad
I
I
I
-lq
"1
I
1
oz
F
=Et!o-
ti
lhrIrlsl
hr
tr t$
I
I
l_
IEto
I
I
I
I
I,
IFt<
IFl@
Ng
NOIIVN]VA
rQ
l=\ utYm
z
tr-
aalrOZr,L <
dQ
FOj$i
:<
=Z tt-
6zto
E()
uJ
J
E
uJz
LU
olol
F,tltlol
ccl
z
'I UJulBooFTz6<n<\Fgroul
s i9
uJ<OGOZ
I
I
Ij
s
6f.4
+l
z:tr
J
q-l
I(u
(c
cd'r{-P
a,rl
'H
r-i()
rri
E
zz
d
.Fl
.tJ
a.rl
UJ
z
qirq({
6{dfi|ll(F{ f..oNsol -qo-
odl
ol crol C
rDl
3l
<l
j
E()=tr
ffi
q
J
E
io-
=
a1
'n€
p
v)
o
.P
d
tr
I
f'.1 rn,l o
XIolot ot"
u>lua .1IJJI ;(xl 'r'1ol d?l >
Jg5 E
=
o
fr
o,]
<l
>l
o
tr
a
frl
1l
<l
>l E
at
UJEo
==e.tr
uJ
oo
J
=
I
o-
F
Lu
Eo
F
t.lJ
=T
E
E
<F cOE() t
l-rJ < ;z.t 3rrr F- \:
i.j_2-
<oOF
trsffi
C)
E
9P
=f]Fd6
C)
<x
vt-?<)
=<+e
Y,z
-o
toE,h
=J- (lFtro2
<o
EK
"..1q
'iltl
1
ciz
Fo
HotL
Jq_*l
qq
-l-+
,.{
UJF
o
Jz
z.n9*
=r- ^1a< x
=zT=fitJO;O-rLH
ifi(Je=
==3-: /\ J-
dd=
=
=
IIJ(L
II
uJ
F
q,
E
CLo
o
o
.E
=E
EI
o
F
=EIrl
o-zo
F
C)fE
6zoo
trnF
-E nnn
l*
IE
I
I
I
I
I
[e
lo
lHStr
rr= iF-<Pvrl
<:9:i
::"F<(4ts?u: 7-:
LrFqYlY(r 4 E:1 "ioYic
;{ozAAzz;:;c <;::
!aFF3:!U<C,<cr":zY
>i;1;i0i::-:
; <ou9olO
a> _?
|,l!arj<.a<]J
olz
a
LU
LU
F.
LU
tl-
ciz
F
E,
uJ
1l-
Lll
F
-za
o
=
I
4
(f
=
l-rl
| (_)t-lu-
lo
tzr6
:f
cn
o
l--
Lll-')
oo
u,F
(]
Jzoz
.n9z\
>z
=:)JO
O- ]L
--l <
(J(J=
;;S
- /\ r'
co u.r =nnn
trD
q,
o
:t
E
Eoo
.l|
.Dro
I c::t
." L
!
7
L()
Goo
a
L
t.|-j
rl.
L!
o-
F-
g
\Jl-.#. irH'(
F;:o2
6p
$E
tr(Jc)zt-
=<1M
fF
G:
F<F
uJ .t.ZK
uJ r'(rz
F()
u-tLIo
Q:
J<()sil
t
x
o-
z
)
J
or
Lu
E
=
2
I
uu
u
F
c
F6
o-
LU
O
l
tu
(J
<nut
tlJ
TLt
=(Y
trl
F-
o:l
:f
Qc
Fo
lll
tu
('z
co
II
NOrlvn'rvA
(rl
(\l
\l
z
6
z
z
9:, o-
;o
Zs-oaJ<)zt!:<
i6r-O; $,i
z
tr
f z
u
o-o
LU(l
z
F(,vt?z
='ut@Y _ lJl5 < [?F9 3 =d";:SH!EH
H:>trIL;5u-OtuOO
z
'r Itd3ao
t- :fazu,
o==Y<Fo'(atrtl_J uJ(!cco
I
I
I
I
Fzlz
tr
o
5
(J ;
u_lIL
o-
FtIo
v)
.g
LUF
)
a
z
O
F
5a
u,l
a
tLlF
z
(J
o-
cr
a(L
G
J
z
Eo
z
t:
K,
LU
=z
O
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ivt
ul(]:l(-jq<I-{
<l
a
\,,(5z
J
ill
5l
aJl<l
rl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I6lal
ri.JI
6l.{l
<l
Hc{q<l
-,|ala:
p r4-g1,.. r''[rsr 11{
.r' ^.rr i'\ [q g {rt r , -
oo
DATE a /t"zl +=JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON -o''@)'
rNsiletroN REeuEsr.
WED THUR FRI
TOWN OF VAIL
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNPATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr D
s+{nr tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT.tr SUPPLY AIH
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
TO !tEO!,t XT HAY COI{CBRNT
Ed StrrrbleBullding Offlcial
dtr
BUILDING PERMIT
Vail, Colorado rate St"f Z? ry
-
7aPerrnit ?7Orf,{
Pe rrnis s ion
as &l 73,
is hereby granted <eP, / Bczt*ra/
to,,- :@ E7, Ctrgafl/c sto ry
on C He$ 7/4A)/4
-.4 ddre s s U&t-.
In accordance with the
Cornroittee, subject to
Prote ctive C ovenant s ,
Type o{ C onst ruction
pr ovis ions s et f o rth by the Vail
the rules and regulations as set
and in cornpliance with the 1964
t Group
A rchitectural Control
forth in the Vail Viltage
Uniforrn Building Code.
Contractor tFVW
,A,pproved
Vail Building Inspector
INSPFCTION RECORD
(For Departrnental use Only)
INSPECTICN .\ PPROV-A L COMMENTS DATE & SIGN/TURE
FOUND-iTIONS
bo
F
,
FRAMINC
FINA L
ROUGHa)
FIN,A L
ROUGHalfl
0"FIN,^ L
ROUGHl-d
0)
o
a
FIN.A L l2 2/7d
+ -r J.,
a
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
THE TOWN OF VAIL
cant fill in this section onl
to
F
6o
BUILDING INFORMA
New Addi
Alteration eoair g
Type cuPancy--.--
(pa rts of building)
NUTT,OiNC DIMENSICNS-
Total floor area (s
No of stories
E
U
l.{
odL
F
u
No. of a
No.ater closete
No, bathe
No. of Families
ESTIMATED COST 4-Lot oF coNsTRUCTIoNiLBlock{Materiele & Labor)
Subdivision
(Cirele correct classificationl
Type of constructlon I. II.III. M.
Occupancy group A. B. C.D. E. F. G.H.I. J.
Approval by planning and architcctural control committee to obtain building
permit.
Date Sigaature
Receipt of PLans
BUILpATG rlrsPEgTION
Approval of Plans(2 sets reouired)Date
Amount of Permit fee t fai - naid: Cash g
Amount oI Clean up Fee $Paid: Caeh $Check $
nl
h0
q,
Fl
Date
Check $
Amount3:j:,0j-:T::i1l.u s-F rap ree p.aid-r.rDalrnspection_ I f Gonetruction
Building addregs
Date of Application 2,/:a
Addre s s
City _ L-/-.r^ Tel. No.
Address
Tel. No.
Address
Certificate of occupanct tr co;pifficd clean-up