The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5C LOT C LAZIER ARCADE HONG KONG CAFE DEMO 1986 LEGALoz t =c UJo- tnr\(\l (v ; c <\l c\l (f, an LU uJttt =E uJ -T-W-,, 1rr tr.s 75 rc6€#2n I I, .Ft<r6 I I I EfliIi lol \(\I'(\l[u d3 A >lM (5 I \ il\<\ UJz3o r.lJ'r z t|-Julo =trorL UJ 'Ku tb hd' 8s. F =Iz. L!,J E 0t q) G .9 CLo.(u 3oF o) at)o(, .6.to' o o E ruE o ; = dl E o =l E(l) o (d 3 .q E oti (!.Y' '=O('X<*toiE8F"; =.e *8 Ht E S-.= 6 -Ffc: E gE.3 E::E =€8:i= >=:.9oEIoSor o o >'= t EieE!Eo :€ 8E gq.eP $!seo.(! 0--sEasoiE-ol =fi:€PAo6 :EEH EtEg .c;oo ar tD !.9 BEISg 3 3e6Ht:cF=-t6F9 ;g:E eEg: - o (E-: r. lr'tf) r\ C\Iol N c(I rf)(v (f) rr (\l(o Ft cvr-l Ol c! tr Ettlo- a5z 6 :. lu oz o- 9uFoql ul z E J C)z UJ = qJ qJ l!zo F r|JE() trJe, ot o co =uJ IUEzo ulo IL IJJ z tu x F uJo tf Lr 2 F o o an uJ uJt!t =uJ J F F o = = F uJ uJ oz a! =J J oz To u., = NO|lVn'lVA :< =lf. z F o-e UJ J uJ2tu r.4 F.Jtjlrt= >E -Ed)Et!,S =aDN F; =6Az!-89r!<ogH6-8 -j(\i z tr Ill- o uJ F o Nr) uJ ) z E z tr u.lFJ =>< =UJz v) z zoq1 <Oa< =vx rr-Uci<z <,)Fz,. 9z tro3tr I ul f o,a UJzY - F 2 FI az I f.) I F)F co E o 3 zl .. >lo u!o u,ll!zoF tflrlIL zo F oo (r tr [- = dIq'q 1 s))-.tl :l 8l r)r-{ r-{i1 H oz Ytts (f) I ')q,OJ q,t* $Jt-".F (\J Ocf u.lF Qoo zcooi Fc\tn\\ul LO Yur5oo :@ ,]^y^ 4 ,/)./i i,/aa "-1& O t-"tt-b: Frf =E uJtL bg>) Esqc-) iil- -lrlgur 23 = I u),1lvz/.o F oz f II rX l_:E J (Jc)z& NF J(.) -,JO I.IJ (,z co =J r>'{t-x F =qJ t! EUYzE<clf€ae9?'Lbe bcE ;rE h=l, # iii: >o-: OLE ooE iut x>E q- oi!; UJ @oF F =g, lrJo-zo F(J :)EFazo(J '{) J oz T uJ = gz Jtr ! 'l-TtP lv1fr I ld =JJJ d!."rrrH+{P I I I I I .. .--lri'i4 ]L rtsa,c ''c!!te = { LrJ =z .Do l+ cL Or'Fl c{q c.lnq(nclo {{ 'lI|o-.1 n(-J i1t\4E .lo "l 1==4= F f. I l(i al b u'tz ^-- z,t! z, l-l !q d aD IJJEo J = t.-l>- F Fz t(lJ lerg N r-l C\J C\I I(o (t E() Eq ) I el ol.-l HlsJllo 3lau-l\olq =lotiFl I )l/ls.l ;--fl Ij d o l! 5l sl bl zl 3lolFI uJ LrJF oz ciutG Ja II z3 F tr z IJJ J iol zl =loH =Etr z UJ : a ll-o z =l9l lU Jul E UJz =l t-o uJL E -rO<FE<) IJ,J <ztu.l F(, Z, J(1! F: 8i t!( i( 7 =3l gF 5E:z) *8 z 'r C)tIJ = ) IY t t,. =FEo2 J< (.)a?.53 EF<KI ts<t r.:<'<J at) =I (r F F G !! 3 UJrF oz hY J-loJE i();= :i .t- 141tE :)(,/cl,c'cl :.s'E ,i ! oE crcIj c Ef I] ;q) ! .Y', "c') :-lt(/' -(J: )65: '(E ta '- lFr:9,c'}:)o'F .C -.1 *r O((Jr a( tt, c =:'I v:- -J r/i o!;$c -ql J::U trl J€ 2 ',,lo t- r3,o ;_- )dl i- i;r> C i a a c : 5 =l i: F,o-(J- o!!: atll :o ): ;0, -f :r )(E:n iE:-t-o .: rE ;E =. (l q)- !c i ;( ;( gl fi CC Eq Eg O.t Uc, ^- iu c.9o_ 69e.: cr (l)(E :-t o.o (l)C 6-C (! -' o(E : ...!: If g: >(): l!rt i -q) -oq): !oc -(ld 6 o l z (J o - t z 6 lrl 9 F E E (J u.J i.! z o- \.)(J c:l ; {rr NOIvn']vA Ye - _B:41!9ooi " 67Y = 5oF O Ftr g(JG :>(JY(Jv)\r2LUr!<(O .,, f,i(JE> (J tJJFOZ-^i 3 dt bil-t E >cE -= z tr o-l UJ Nki -, >l olurll i UJ o- J zo; dUJ F 3 F : (J I F tr J f <n azlz9,o <() ZEo:oo<z trz. 9z_iF r! (t}E oa o_ trJ l z E :r tr F ( -1 Lu Izl o i|I z I I l l_ t<ro I \{l s W I I I I I I F 2 LU uJ lJ_ F Ll-I F t! F U' UJF z =o .J lcl = uJ Xdn = UJ tto C^-o; E< ooc|- :F-rE E>"g;r- F h> (,'Jg ; :d -YIcvOqJ F .._5 6s |oYF IUo F t_ I, nlI It -._c a) \z \- o /q\I r*',lE \'-,1 ll=\IE ,t= z =< =z O- lr- J!< ^;<'-: a r -r'. ttuJE z 0a =,^Go2 <; :FZO O; >3 ZY ;(J =$ --u((J <oOF;Ot<ir E JO<F lu< <32 F ulF xtIJz = U zJ<(Jo<nLu ul --.r O I I I I I I 9l ,;l utlcl JI ?l>l u-lol ]l 9lFI Iol =lollrjl 5l <l>l ol fl ol 'l(,l uJl (El JI <l>l q.lIil YI I I I I el ol H'l <l>l u-Iol il 9lFI I I I I .l ?l -u.ll TI <l>l u-l 2l xt : bEc lIJ ol o oz u =o '!Ea?!-J. ?i Z=e v l: e - - -E .= = ; .+ t:rT. tE i+ . a5E-.= E E. = a 2== y.i a' t -=iZ F.! i=.>^:at-. i - u- -I::..: i d.: ; : -5 / !.:= ! a =:::- J - -- : =; !; j ;- i= lz.lz-a^Z ', 2 ..f i : u a:l-'! 2 2=.aE : : E;: j"r;5 :: * 9 - C 1- -i:: r ! I : a!F.- a E;:; I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I +Jt(I, l(UlL+J)tnt-t.-lro l=trr, lC\ll* I I I l+rl.^ 1*tq)iotliol=l'rI>...-sl,Full .dLl> aJlct . +.rlc)!- tofl..IU(-)o:zl- I I :,.E =E , (f) I +J .6! ill.|J vloe. Lr- (5 (o o +r cr.) F{ (r) tdI,L (J (5z, v. (5 z. z r!kt-a\ .i. ,-o F-'-ulH9:- ._J ,.. v\ rr /\\v!-zz!a<< Jnzarat, H. \J F-2UQ-3i|rr F--ri r/t ;^fszq.-V a\ lrJ !/- a< ,.3P>> ). 'itr\a <F<= a< c4 ca5=oo)r z Lr.,J F- -t--*r{{H9ii-2.---<V..5IJY?O:*Z>F=<-P -J-'?Eqi!5-FX KJ F*o>E*Fi-Yr<3b+< =+t-.-\t-=la\,,f-^-SoxxFZe:ffi=LU:XH.,'FY*Ffi5it--\-]>a- {-rF -aA. -aIF?*+f.tt X.f. FR ENts -rtsa -lalJ Fr{H -t.f- I+<,F tF. fh\.-,V :.-+Flt -E|e ts\ -dLI IP -E *Fl L.Hft\E' rFl FL+ Ar *rf etLI rlJfH .lJ*rt }{6. € F - (\r\st<\l U F z E bo (o or qr Fl Lo-o (l,u (uo3'o cU D r.o Ol oq. Ltt uJFa @o-zo F0-lrlY uJo oF F E lrJ o- IIo o-oo uJFoz uJ o z .!9 =Edloo ==€TY =E:=()i=uJ;dd= = H l! EU =zE<af€uB9EEaeEtrE -ttF h=E tffE :+-E Ub9 iuE q*I q*o-i!tr uJ .0 F --- F =&,lU o-zoF()fEFozoo nnEl t =g uJo- ,Q6, cl F | 9try. L r- lts s l*ilE riFt lE3 i3e t.E lo lzti ,z Z.\9=o< E. =>8, !tu z =ir O- F9ano1>!l()9Zrr<o*a-otoFO i<ri Jl<l trl zl zl .. >lout llJulz at)F uJ J z Eo (, =Jtr l-INlo) l* Hl *rl xlol-l qt s,]t-Fl "-F .rtol> J><FEO I I I lnl' I I Jatt |JJlEI CIdqJ Eo 4o.r: @ @ I(o I<l(I)l <\t I-l ;l 1l sl tl-l 9l e|Fl (J = E.c) CE = F) tltltltltllollzlI cjlI r.rJlI5lt<lI>lI ltlloltzlc3l HPI tltltllltlt.l lelIOII utll.EltJlt<ltilloltzl =t =ltrl 0lILI FI =.1('l sl <l>l 5l zl 3l FI I I I I cil =.1 rl-l>l rLlolzt ..t pl E E -rO<F IJJ <ZEt!F(tt Zo() ) c UJJ r.lJ F E z F g Fi- \JZ nntr !- 3 OJ OJ Yll x i' ffip s.1 X s $ s,.il X "$ X s fi .vl '11q] uJ u,J LL E uJ I tn I Qr\!$r, \rtr \,t \.< t \: t\ltl N € z z o rUFoz o Jj 0: F Fa cr uJ ; LUzi LL .i 0, (J (6 3oF q) o 1t o o ; l E o f E o 6 3 0, .= g ,/, airrLE!o-rOc -|;(J(E/) c sr o9 ;6E'r.= G -SrcX ; 0) Y.9c-o>'- (/, =o(Ecy!- 3:-e:.r,Y - ci'-o _; >.xHq:X:F= i:6;.9o.rjiq-i",.Y- (!; o-(! d- '--c:o - O- O)E eo.E (ECrr So = I,-qv=oro!'"* - E I' :=g- - oi 9, c; (l) ./) -- a, Z tl) E -:-.o: =E'3 u >.=- tEFs >. -: ^ ;,69:;v o-o -;ico(/, LIJIF oz .J \.,\ F z J l Y i(J z J E F gJ z =lJ - I uJ UJ z tr uJ IJJ 3 UJt!! z 6 UJ ul ?z -) x F !Jal d $ $. \, \ ul LIJ !,L-t-' E,Ei o a F uJ IU =@ =- ul5 ) t-- roF NOuVntvA ol p:G : zz i -o- A :fE9 0 ch0Zy6Yr!< t-3 d (\i =>cE v \ 1\ttrl)g ) t t(l z tr l { G o- (J gJ F i o-lul 1I EE F trtt iI4o r!I 1l ll}I u., Izl c u.cuIIz U,t tuc azI!o {{ IX R=r! Cs. T \+IQ tol.-il=l:dl?lE F]JI<(/)tcol0- 0.)F- =rE u, /f-- o- (F r-rC5 O-.F .O tt) rl- 6 -u-vCX.e 0Jd3 OqroCJLr- (,.) l-.rJ(n-o oJO< L! C- L)z.oa-.r = aur-9= c5 Lq- ^ = t+- o v) c7) O o).+J 'rJ+J CJ =J .F) Lo (E lllF o >( oF F tlJ tl- o I t!F z UJItl--FF{(\ LJJ IL F\ LIJIr) \4 z =e =z O- tL J ,^*-s>.=z 'aES--:.\.! coil> DTF LTJ LJ. LLJ F :Z oa = >< Ld-F LJE. LTJ = F= -J Lr- lrJ an rJJ J o o qt o c oo o ) .l< lc q fi ql= I I t_ld I I I Jq,u{ dcf I E(J tltltltltttlt.lloll-ltolI urll:ltall>lI tltloltzl =31qol tltttltl l"lllltolI uill:ll?ll>lI trllollzl Et x u-l Fl I I I .l =.1 utltrl JI <t>l EIol zt ..1 F|i .5^ ll <= llY9 'f(J O1t- =F -=n ll =fi ll oc =Y ll =? ll E ? =E li =tr ll * E =2 II 9= ilbtz ;z \r zo-o ll Eo ll ocJ ll -o ll (J TD! '^ 2 r/<-('-V l(>4/JJ I tNs n JE--- ^ -.ItLt - l at lilf E\, I l\rlI TOWN OFPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT/..D^TEil!! I ; REQUEST VAIL READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: JOB NAME MON '',1/ l\ CALLER TUES WED THUR -) BUILDING:PLUMBING: tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr FOOTINGS / STEEL UNDERGROUND ROUGH / D.W.V.FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING !icns PTPTNG .----, INSULATION SHEETROCK tr POOL/ H. TUB NAIL tr D FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING -tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr 7Frrunr tr FINAL -/fennove- ]@RRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED AND ASSOCIAES INC PO Bcx l4l3 V:il Colorcdo 81658 (3C3) 827'5in March 13, 1986 Gary Murrain T.0.V. Building DepartmentVail, C0 81657 Subject: Meeting ot 3/L2/86 on construction process Kong Cafe, HilI Building (not represented), Ga ry, 1. No trash dumpster on job site. 2. Four foot construction fence at areas Any permanent plywood barricades to be .,z-.'fo(!ls.@djs), Hong and #l Vail Place. I. appreciated the opportunity to solve some logistic problems concerningthe various construction activities surrounding ttre Fbunders plaza Area] I am listing below the criteria that you have indicated will need to be adheredto: a of activity. Snow fence acceptable.of color specified by T.0.V. Bui lding Dept. 3. Access to Plaza site willvia Hanson Ranch Rd. Flaqthis area. 4. Limited access to Founders Plaza area. No permanent fence at walkway between Hill Bldg. and Plaza Lodge Bldg., to remain accessable toT.0.V. Fire Dept. 5, Probable use of T.0.V. snow dump site east of Ford park for trashdumpster location and mini-staging site. 6. Staging possibilities are: A. Plaza decksB. Vail Associates landC. T.0.V. snow dump site 7. Prior to issuing Bui'l ding permit T.0.V. will need: A. Construction scheduleB. Site plan showing construction fence locationC. Type of fence to be usedD. New ut j'l i ty l ocations be acceptable from upper bridge street people will be required when access by Gcnurol C-ontroctors l{e at Beck & Associates appreciate the grief that core construction can cause,but it is our intent to soften the blow-by getting the bulk of the "heavy,,work accomplished in April and May. Si ncerely, eu/- C-"$@J Bi I I Anderson Project Manager Beck & Associate's Inc. BA/Khcc: Clark }Jillingham Snowdon & Hopkins o?"o*orroN oF RESrRrcrrvE toQ*o*" THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTM COVENANTS - is made and en- tered into this - day of rity''igdb'- uv and'between David li' Irish whose r"etl tailt"=- it 'p ' -o-' 's"" 2294' Vail' Colorado 81658, and H K c Limited Partnership' *tto=u l-ega] address is 22i I4.a11 Street, vail, Colorado- aro;i'r"'uecfarants"), arrd the Town "i-v"if, a Colorado municipal corporation ' WHERBAS, David K' Irish and H K C Linited Partnership are the owners of the foltowing d'"*cribtd real propertv (the "Proper'- ty") situate in tt" Cot"'ty of Eagle and State of Colorado ' to wit: A part of Lot C' Block 5-C' VATL VILLAGE' FIRST FIL- fNG, County of Eagle '-Stttt of Colorado' more partic- ularly described as follows: Comnencing at the Northeast corner of f'"f g' said Block 5-C; thence Westerlv along tt'' noltneriy line of said Lot B' b*- ing on a curve to the left having a -':adlus of 582 ' 79 feet, a central tt'grJ tilg degrees 03 ninutes 06 se- cond's t an arc distance of 86'48 feet; thence South 10 degrees 30 ninutes i6 =u"""as East' 134 '00 feet to the true poi'nt of be'ein;ing; thence continui'ng along theaforesaidcour="-Ji:lo-ti-heet;thenceNorth?9de- grees 29 minutes 44 =""o"a" East' 44'00 feet; thence North 10 d'egrees 30 linutes 16 seconds West ' 42 ' 00 feet; thence South Zd'^atJ"""s 29- m-inutes 44 seconds r+."t, i-'OO fttt; thence South I0 degrees 30 minutes 16 seconds East' 6'06 feet; thenc-e South 79 degrees 29 minutes 44 t""o"it west' 40 '00 feet to the true po j-;; ;f begi-nning ' *"r"""- "r Vail ' Countv of Eagle ' state of Colorado ti=o known as 225 Wall Street' Vai1, Colorado 8165? ' WHEREAS, the Declarants wish to demolish the exisiing building located upon the aforesaid Property; and WHEREAS, the Declarants wish to construct a new building upon the ProPertY; and HEREAS, the Declarants wish to construct a certain exteri- or buildirrg ,.f-i'-( ffr" ;'W*f f " t "iti"ir- tj-ll co*pti." the west side of the new building; and IIHEREAS, the Declarants wish to construct i|: Y:il i:":::l a manner that ifs construction wi'I1 not comply with the require- nents of the Uniform Buitding C-Jat "= adopted bv the Town of Vail, in that ii *i11 not be " io"-itour f ire-rated wall on ac- eount of the inclusion of certain tittdo*" in the Wall; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail is willing to consent to such construction so -lo"g as the DJarants publish and deelare cer- tain term=, "oJ""*t*s, eonditions ' easements restrictionst usest -1- oareservations, limitaLions and obligatioiE, alL of whieir sharl bedeened to run with the Property described above; NOW, THEREFORE, Declarants do hereby publish and declarethat the following terms, covenants, conditions, easemenEs, .e-strictions, uses, reservations, rimitations and obligati.ons slralLbe deerned to run wi th the property d.escribed above , shal 1 tre aburden and a benefit to the Declarants, or any of them, theirpersonal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns and anyperson aequiring or owning any interest in the property and anyinprovernents built thereupon, their grantees, personal "*pr"="rrltatives, heirs, successors and assigns. 1.Consent. TheDeelarants to consr,ruc!four-hour fire-rates Wal1 in the WaLl-. Town of Vail hereby agrees to all-ow thethe Wa1-l , such that the Walt is not adue to the inclusion of certain windor+s t': 2. Agreement. Declarants hereby agree that in the eventthat Lodge Properties, Inc., shall desire to develop its properLyto the fullest extent permi"tted by applicable zoning and buil-d.ingLaws and regulations up to the common boundary between the Lodgeproperty and the HKC property, Declarants agree to nodify thei.iall such that it is brought into compliance with the provisi.onsof the unif orrn Building code as i.t exists on the date of execu-tion hereof . . 3. Covenants Running With Land. These terms, condi-tionsl res€rvations, restrictions and covenants shalL at al-1tirnes be construed as a covenant running with the land and may berevoked only by the recording of an instrument d.uly executed andacknowredged by al1 of the owners of record of the duprex units. - 4. Notice. Declarants shall_ register their nailing ad-dresses with the Town of vail and aLL notices or demands intendedto be served upon Declarants shall be sent by certified mai1, re-turn receipt requested, addressed in the name of that Declarantat such registered mairing address. rn the alternative, noticesmay be de-livered personarly to either or both Declarants, if inwriting. 5. Enforcement and Remedies. (a) Each provision of this agreement shall be en-forceable by the Town of Vaill by a proceeding for a prohibitiveor mandatory injunetion or by a suit or action to recover d.am-ages. rf court proceedings are instituted in connection with therights of enforcement and remed.i-es provided for in this agree-ment, the prevaiJ_inE party shall be entitled. to recover his orits costs and expenses in connection therewith, lncruding itsreasonably incurred attorneys' fees. (b) The parties hereby agrees that any and aLl ac-tions in law or in equity which are instituted to enforce anyprovision hereunder shal-f be brought only in the courts in andfor the County of EagJ.e in the State of Co.l_orado. -2- ot ( c ) Fai.lure to enf orce an-y provisions of this a-greement shall not operate as a waiver of any such provision, theright to enforce such provision thereafter, or of any other pro-vislon of this agreement. 6. Suecessors and Assigns. Except as otherwise pro'idedherein, this Declaration sha.ll- be binding upon and shall- inur.e tolhe benefi t of Declarants and each ohrner "nd th. heirs, personalrepresentatives, successors and assigns of each. 7 . Severabj.Iity. Invalidi-ty or unenf orceabiLi.ty of anyprovision of this agreenent i.n whole or in part shal1 not effectthe validity or enforceability of any other provision or any va-rid and enforceable part of a provision of this agreement. 8. Captions. The captions and head.ings in this instru_ment are for convenient reference only, and sha11 not be consi-dered in construing any provisions of the Deelaration. L Construction. When necessary for proper construc-tion, the mascul-ine of any word used. in this agreement shal-l- in-clude the feminine or neuter gend.er, and the singular the pluraland viee vers&. rN tion of WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have executed this Declara- 1986.Restricti-ve Covenants. this day of May, By: H K C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP David Ir.. Irish General Partner David Il . lrish Indivi.dual ly STATE OF COUNTY OF COLORADO EAGLE Subscribed 1986, by DavidPartnership and Wi tnes s rny ss. and sworn to before me thi-s K . Irish, as General partner individual-1y.ofH day of May, K C Linited hand and official seal . My commission expires: Notary Public -3- Address rt Tlry l, tqf, P.O Box 1208 Vail, Colorado 81658 303 / 476-1818 Office: 303 / 476-7970 0t-/nn N ^J\/,1 Yfu/vLat "L)I ?"t ry(,f ctf*'^.t) 'Yo.)u 4 L)^^t) ^/)ft€, A.fft*artl'J -f-, tuXl'utV /"1""'e / /lb t*, 4fu-. n44.aLa,u/ur V,- hl*q rLrl C"F f**r*hr/ Ut rc) "ty^-fu t)."f T? k+,-t V:^ ztvt'zt-'ut) d I /yt J a'.t ,A- 4flrr4ucaL.*t) P ,o/2't/La""'t'''ee-' $ a' IIMIA^'rz 7 pt n'ui. Jnz thlt xztufu*lx), w$4^j-d- Y* 0t- Wptn-u/ rk a/144t ,4,(4 a,- ru/kh.z/ m uw zL{,tr*d-u{-7zt-^tr^"'t, Nr(c .zu>dzoah.-rdv th"J Crts /*+ou*hfri<) 7g//n-r*,/ .uL zza/ a- /r*U P c-j7L4h",-czt4"d atruaL t'jal a- /ril'fi,u*rtt rrr+a,f l;L pn-7ila-or- fu/-* ed=ttz.rdu-1u ant{ l'r4^"'") -b/wr,/, frc /t 7'*unW, AL*'4#'";L' ,As t Pa'tt H{-C . r? M,+/ 7, fla< t (*v,y fhuvrAin -lChie{ RrikJ,'u:c, OS,c'AL Tcxrrru 'q Vni f V+t l- , (olr:vAclo Re, \e^.rj.fi,r^ .>{+ne il.,,5Kr*l (4f€ \=*u. {Y\a /hurr4itu'. BEft\G. Av..ry U.y*wu *L ,lov^K be.4tyu,a oN] { he l-lo*a Ko^r.1 /,+Sa': eo,usJru*ou <,fe ', t ha Fl.ern i:15 wl LL be E;a.vver! u.,'r*l^, Lcoru:fyuc*roru 4enge. -T lris bartricrq.{e w'rLL be rnrq',^lt+i^.1e./ rua.r A 7u*EI,r erucl , urooKr,r"lqwl, Kra rvrANN€r. cluvi^11 +ytl- VONr=*tAruJ shsLL av^e-<-Luc.[e *ha LnsuoL pAssarz b7 {*i* evrJterr\ula * uea -5ob,=}'l= R,e=pa.lf.Ly, f>nL(/ . -E'ngov,Tr.:<-.4,%leffi t ]NTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVi EI,,J DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date //- z 5-- &d Comments: /-,/o" ie.:z'/ f4-r,./t4*,<r 2- Fznt-PaV r. /tc<-a1.4 ."1 .t/^2..2-. / o"z-ZB) (u ) -a.-.^ror.)f2,,"2- n/f'*'d- tz1'L/B' AK, 6a3 ?.7nut.-4- "t<-<'444 6 "'7 7"{ zJ 4: 30 " 'et-"ooo- yzE"'"J*'' I'f/n 7 5)" //'2 d ^'/ 4"4'.z- ' J-/"'/"+ z/ 5. Q' ,3t2?r rer"'al 'i1{-- f t 2o o ult;- z{' '(fantorZ {1lia ' c/<"-aFt ('' *'"- n t- r^rr-, 724i4 eko'T4 7 Q: a'oouy'z- /r./42,*.,72-r.J $' 'fa'7ta'/ '*' POLICE DEPARI}IENT Revjewed by:_ Date Comments: n tZ"*.-' ? t**'yo- / &t-r-//n"n' t:o'""-t- 4'3 i: :,' ;;:.-::/":;-ii*' '221.<'a -t':- /-'"zr't-"t7 6r szizrz'o4 ls'-a"< s) ,/Z- O, 4<.2/nzt'. ts 24at'r ?'u l5!Fa6a ,/j A: cay/z/e7'7^2' derzs*'-T 4-ds<'/rz'ilrta'vv' O'/1 ' /q /,rr'n -,,rt,4.4.,.q -ri/s7- *i:t,, :"o l, fgl ,^-,, ,.n,,,.2 sr*z< /,f. o?.- ,/c,,tzz.-z 5-v'aausf -y''- r'o' / 4'az--7 d"'/ c2"'"2 sr8zS'' RECREATION DEPARTMENT Reviewed by. Date Comments: ,r/. .fr5ft*7 ,,/*1,-'aa-zv2'/P'*z-/t" s'tJT - *Ar/s e-//a"'n''outo/nza aJ1"-'/ -Dutu-'------- ' - ^-fu fiztrz:' au ,,tzr ,,2.,,? oun z'o 'a-"4-4t a'/ ^tZ ' , 1A t PRIJECI: .4' DATE SUBMiTTED: COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BRITF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: PUBLIC WORKS Reviewed by: Comments: F]RE DTPARTMINT . ,Z Reviewed bv: 2-'<"-''>-' oI Er"1 g^"il / II] $ + s (r luFFtuJ :E .= boN oo: o-q:;3e.E o! or\g'lt o'OH .:.! 6 '!N i L.i=N -!aYr ! -- ('bs Y Ao s s t : 9 : til 6 ! 9: i:],:j*lr!t':;,,n.ro fufJg7taaD;:ii T;flff i "'1'd n s c e n I e r 303/476.2170 LETTHR Date ez MAq p*- Xf*'ffi? ffiH"l*" fteere :ii: h b r-or'{o rc€ iZbt ffiE fu@z- Dexlv--w '' 'vv' r2 VAU VuXg rcaoat.ct> at 'l)16 ?ptu+ F 1T+t, Ma-io l+ +o ^*ry.+4 y*tF A trwe cLANeE, TIE r+M. I+ kA{ra> O* 'f>1€" P# @{4^.V, RA1 (sz\, Agsr 4tffi OF ?_cy^,A, ,,^ ft' t . -r^ V tl 'A{*Ie ALL@ Ouf A9 7-2ttO, -TH6 karl Ltxstut_ av+ar:._ WH;"ffiL,yHa/ M'rn{, rueu,"l fuNr{&tloA9 Akl anu_- W: Cc' Ja'4gu hlqetgtorl l_] Please reply I No reply necessary 1_t7_:.+_l) \PF:-Fmez\ 2( nu.er DeLr> ) M FoNM 146.2 Ara,tabre rio6 l&EJ/toc. G,oton. MAss or.5o LETTER r'ik!.' ra6.? r_ ,.,"u.e r,J, . i!t,,r' ,r. ""lj, w..ss or.rsu N 'lWA eqog--r or Jer4fu? tu*l4rz*t1or_ln+b ffiFre ktas W+4 AsvED -fo A,*1,$ffiFwtvE- Forz 1>+€ 4-#2aa5 E"o*1+f+ ree- ?ruar fle, 4tFE€. * tqlz+o F*tl*r* reE n+*oc+ Ut€. 4- + 6tz+> prdq+=b ,*+ N fi-xW+0fi1v6.Itr 1o,; lAva ANLI qt)ffiio,+s ?Ee2^{zr>tu=,, -tut+ t'Wrtlo "t#g Co*.rk=r .17+1+ oF?ca. I Please repty 6r"ot, necessary l,r, l. , rrginr.:cring, inc,r.( ] r). tneadow dr, Suitc n-Iocrr/ssroads shopping center vart, colorado 816 57 303/ 476-2170 MIeuto,@ Date ll JUA)€ t?*- suorect ME\z{o ,AiNo rgTnL 11 t-4A:, Lqga W +lal6, #--e- fqe, eAyo,+laAtuL2#4rc* 1 llonztFl+' ?4t @€8. &ees wu€.VHt-,@(ne-*oo 6t61 rNs CTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL NAME READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: CALLER MON TUES WED APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED BUILDING: FOOTINGS / STEEL d tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr HOUGH / WATEB tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING r_r ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR CORRECTIONS: DATE INSPECTO il r* INSPE 'l PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE READY FOR INSPECTION: LOCATION: r ,i,' CTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL * JOB NAME MO|_r,l |,1 CALLER /lUES,: l.t , THUR FBI BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND t I\FOUNDATTON / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr BOUGH / WATERtr FRAMING fr ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING l tr INSULATION - tr POOL/ H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr_ tr E tr FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING r* tr ROUGH E EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr {rrrunl tr FINAL APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORBECTIONS: * PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL DATE JOB NAME READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: CALLER MON TUES BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER - ROOF & SHEERu PLywooD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL o tr FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANlCAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr tr.FINAL tr FINAL . pTAPPRoVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUTRED INSPECTORDATE READY FOR INSPECTION:.4ilri AM ai; LOCATION: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL H uruoeRcnouruo tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING |-1 ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK tr POOL/ H. TUB NAIL tr tr tr tr FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRIGAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr tr,f rNAL tr FINAL ', 1i. .'F;'APPROVED , CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSP ..,. I r.,,1:t,r,i.l! CTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL F\i.. \ '. .\ READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: CALLER TUES GD THUR AMFRI PERMIT NUMBER OF FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB tr FINAL tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR APPROVEDI CTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTO It?7 / t-- P DATE b { L JoB NAME INSPECTION REQUEST, TOWN OF VAIL'/|v / / ..-\ /\ i.' *" .7 CALLER READY FOR INSPECTION:MON TUES WED .I!uj) Fll -AM PM1@ BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS tr FOUNDATI tr FRAMING / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATEF ON / STEEL n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING _tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION - tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL -trb 7- ,; ,. r f t+'Igl ,f-.\r> L t.t ft\' o tr FINAL tr FTNAL ELEGTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANIGAL: tr HEATING tr BOUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr tr FINAL FINAL , APPROVED )RRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIFED ECTIONS: I '1 x /,(^DATE t/1 '/O*Y''--u ,NS'ECTOB DATE READY FOR INSPECTION: JOB NAME MON CALLER TUES F INSPECTION REQUEST' TOWN OF VAIL \\\\ l \\\.. \. t \ wED @ PM q-. PERMIT NUMBEB OF PROJECT LOCATION: a BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEE. tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER - ROOF & SHEEBu pLYwooD NA|LING cAS plptNc . - i, t -i ,Z_. .i --li:c; tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr D tr tr tr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr qfrNAL tr FINAL ED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIBED CORRECTIONS: oete ,.'t :. '',4 tNSpEcToR - INSPECTION REQUEST T TOWN OF VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED . THUR FRI , AM PM LOCATION: BUILDING: D FOOTINGS / STEEL tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING ,_ ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr INSULATION - tr SHEETROCK NAIL - ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER - PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W,V. tr ROUGH / WATER D GAS PIPING tr POOL / H. TUB o tr tr FINAL tr FINAL MECHANICAL: D HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUppLy AtR _ trtr tr FINAL O FTNAL .tr,,APPROVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED DATE INSPECTOB rNs#ctoN, TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL oare 7''-),"' ,.f6 JoB NAME l READY FOR INSPECTION:MON TUES WED THUR FRI PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT CALLER LOCATION: d nppRovED_.., CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND _ tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr tr FINAL tr FINAL MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr FINAL INSPECTOR I'L'n'i r\ t ".ic!PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT-REQUESTVAIL } t tNs READY FOR LOCATION: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND Q*BOUGH,i.D,W.V. tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING n BOOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PtPttiG tr INSULATION tr POOL i H. TUB NAIL tr F tr FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr/ FTNAL _tr FINAL 1/fiiceenoveo ldRREcrrons, tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CTIONS: rlrrspEcrcih t^,,I\en I/^\ \ r\; PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT N OF rNs REQUEST VAIL\* \.- -t$DATE \ a-\J \): aJOB NAME -___\ .ALLER READY FOR TNSPECTTON: l.Ygg./ rues _____ __{,_1(D PMWEDTHURFRI LOCATION: -/, BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS i STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V. D ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING n BOOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB K tr trl SHEETROCK tr FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRIGAL:MECHANICAL: tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr tr FINAL -\PPROVED RRECTIONS: tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR IN CTION TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL I I READY FOR INSPECTION:ruES gb.,t rHUR I NAME MON FRI LOCATION: PEBMIT NUMB BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. D ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING T] GAS PIPING E INSULATION tr SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr tr tr tr tr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr tr FINAL APPROVED.- .-.-tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED COBRECTIONS; s,,o" TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL ,ir= '. , , t ..\ j.i\t JoB NAME rNs -.'-e-MON TUES TWED - THUR FRI I I READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:t!AM TPM PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND'ilnoucH / D.w.v. BFOUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETFOCK NAIL o tr tr tr tr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANlCAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH T] EXHAUST HOODS tr coNDUrr tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr FINAL E FINAL VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED i CORRECTIONS: DATE tNs TION TOWN OF REQUEST VAILECT JOB NAME INSPECTION;MON F PROJ :\') I + CALLER TUES THUR FRI@ AM €.,READY FOR LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER O\r-.DATE \ at,.A BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGBOUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER-. PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION - tr POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr tr tr FINAL tr SHEETROCK {::lvg tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECH.ANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr_tr ssr!tr FINAL TryPRovED ]OFRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIFED INSPECTOR tNs )''\ THUR FRI ( CTION REQUEST r TOWN OF VA|L r I or e'D(of tu=s wED nHEcrrorus: tr DISAPPROVED ., uJ,r* F *uC oereE- /l-?Lr rNspEcr REQUEST VAIL '! tNAME CALLER READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:MON @ WED THUR FRI AM@ BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER _ BOOF & SHEER " pLywooD NAtLING tr GAS PIPING -tr INSULATION _tr POOL / H. TUB E SHEETROCK NAIL tr n tr tr tr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr FINAL SUPPLY AIB \PPROVED RRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED t * INSPECTION TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL IPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE JOB NAME INSPECTION:MON I -^. t l CALLER 11 f._ READY FOR LOCATION: ruES _Gt THUR FRI BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: U FOUNDATION / STEEL tr UNDEBGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH /WATERtr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB E] SHEETROCK NAIL n tr tr FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: O HEATING ( tr tr tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr FINAL ED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION BEQUIRED CORRECTIONS: INSPECTOR TOWN OF REOUEST t VAIL I t.JOB NAME 7 READY FOR INSPECTION:-/.---"-tMON ( TUES \WED\*____./\.---...//LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ,or, "l/t// /[ BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER -/PLYWOOD NAtLtNG x TNSULATTON _ GAS PIPING -tr POOL / H. TUB flsHeernocx NAIL tr tr tr tr tr FINAL FINAL ELEGTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr. 4f'*o,-FINAL r/,|PPRovED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED i:/ '''/g , i PERMIT NUMB OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL DATE 'ff ,o, *o*,?r /, I * 4. READY FOB INSPECTION: LOCATION: MONy',.o"-TUES THUR BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS i STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr BOUGH / D,W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER n HOOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION - tr POOL / H. TUB _ tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr_tr_ tr FINAL tr FINAL ELEGTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING -f,goucn tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr FINAL tr FINAL APPROVED CORRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIRED f") ) ,.7', f) /D^rE { - 1 L/ " 4r/; tNSPEcroR rNsPERMIT N MBEB OF PROJECT DATE JOB NAME READY FoR INSpECTIoN: MoN TuES .wED ff-r^-) FBt "ia.{: eu pM LOCATION: . ut"z'T 4ut l" t,.tt r"..-('x---- TION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING frr.rsuleloru _tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL o tr tr FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL: tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr_tr_ tr F/fiAL,ii . - tr FINAL al aiffPRovED /oh6r.t,.,r*. tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIBED CTIONS: *Fh (Y'-')',,/{,i.8 l--rn,<, J,J t(L ,or= ?' ]{-/=- tNspEcr I REQUEST' ? I READY FOR LOCATION: WED THUR FRI PM a', A BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr BOUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr !fENAL tr FINAL OVED E DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: INSPECT PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT.l_"'t'-.._', .\^ DATE \.\. (J.\ L r-.\C, JOB NAME TION TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL t I ...'. CALLER READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: MON ruES (u#o ,THUB /.'''..,\ (FRr.: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D,W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n BOOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANIGAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS o coNDurT N SUPPLY AIB tr O FINAI-FINAL t APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION BEQUIRED DATE INSPECTOR * ,*r#"toNTOWN OF REQUEST VAILPERMIT^NUMBER OF PROJECT '''., _ ..r'i _'\ JoB NAMEDATE \ i.TX \,. CALLER .I.\:-i INSPECTION: .---1MoN TUES -Wro "r rxun FRIREADY FOR LOCATION: / 1./' Il\4' I BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr FOUNDATION / STEEL E UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. E ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUBI Q SHEETROCK t-tr-- tr FINAL - tr n D FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWEB MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr dlrrrunl tr FINAL \PPROVED BRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIBED INSPECTO -\\'. ; *INS P, .'.' CTION REQUEST oor= ' '"'.-\''. -\..'\ I READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: JOB NAME MON TUES WED rHUR lr*i t: PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr BOUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL D FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION ("*=.-*o"* tr POOL / H. TUB tr .tr tr trD FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MEGHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr tr o']rrrrrnr-tr FINAL PROVED tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: INSPECT f\/ t'1 j.=zY t *' J rNS#cnoN REeuEsr , PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL JOB NAME \ I CALLER READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:MoN rurs {p rHUR FRI PM ', ,. /D ln /i"IDATE 7/"//J V BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: C] UNDEBGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr trtr tr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL:MECHANIGAL: [re"r. tr ROUGH tr HEATING tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT T] SUPPLY AIR tr tr FINAL tr FINAL tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED(' CORRECTIONS: il tNs TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL \ f CALLER MoN TUEI( wED rtluR FRI \'-- ---.----..-- - -' on{-" ;r ', PERMIT NU OF PROJECT DArE 4 - tl-'kQ^ JoB NAME READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: BU trl trl trl nl trl trl tr PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER -tr GAS PIPING tr POOL / H. TUB tr FINAL tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING tr CONDUIT tr FINAL PPROVED COBRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED f-> DATE '-l - ,tO - bh tNSpEcToR INS CTION TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL I \ *DATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:TUES 9 THUR JOB NAME MON CALLER FRI -@'" PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ,/ ir s fFl BUILDING: O FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr BOUGH / D.W.V. tr BOUGH /WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING - n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION E] SHEETROCK D POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr FINAL tr tr FINAL ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL: tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING tr EXHAUSTtr ROUGH - HOODS D SUPPLY AIR tr FINAL tr FINAL tr coNDUrJ _ o LLt' AJ" \ r ,APPROVED 4',l tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS:" DATE INSPECTOR rNs TION REQUEST . TOWN OF VAIL \ t DATE JOB NAME MON CALLER I' :'.-r-' \ nenov FoR tNSpECTtoN:\ \ocnrroru: TUES rfiE-o--l rnun FRI AM trr') BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH / WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr tr D trtr FINAL FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB tr A FTNAL _________-______FINAL f./ '^ppRovED€f';f,tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: INSPECTORDATE !t II,o.,' CALLER TUES T", fr nEa-rnrlf E\, I l\rll TOWN OF REQUEST VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT oor=\-33-i$,.! JoB NAME READY FOR INSPECTION:uP,'""MON FRI .4,AM (EN!-,' I-OCATION: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH i D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK D POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr D EI{r'*o.FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR tr_tr trFINAL FINAL tr APPROVED DISAPPROVED CTION REQUIRED DATF^. i{-,' l( \ Cr-t., INSPECT rlh,),:{2r ,r, rr".9i t ot/ Uo INSPECTIONTOWN OF REQUEST.I VAIL ft PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT III NAME CALLER READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION:MoN @ *to rHUR FRI BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER |-1 ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING -tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK N POOL / H. TUB NAIL n tr FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR -tr_tr_ ? FINAL tr FINALqf@"r-o cbRREcTtoNs: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTO /> \\\$,, cc\ \ \.\ PERMIT NUMEER OF PROJECT oor.\ -AB-:-$\s JoB NAME BEADY FOR INSPECTION: MON -\r\\*/INSPECTION REQUEST l* -ltrt CALLER TUES ; ! '::' 0b.) rHun FRI AM q!4-l TOWN OF LOCATION: BUILDING: tr FOOTINGS / STEEL PLUMBINGT tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL r] FRAMING tr ROUGH /WATER n ROOF & SHEER* PLYWOOD NAILING O GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB . NAIL o cl tr tr{r'r.rer-FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP, POWER MECHANIGAL: tr HEATING tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR FINAL FINAL tr APPROVED DI '!" REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: rl \ \ A4TF. l+sn fi PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE READY FOR LOCATION: INSPECTION: JOB NAME CALLER TUES v * INSPECTION TOWN OF REQUEST VAIL a WED THUR r\rQLI @) PM Bt tr tr tr tr tr tr tr t F. LDING:PLUMBING: tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D.W.V. tr ROUGH /WATER FOOTINGS / STEEL FOUNDATION / STEEL FRAMING ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING INSULATION SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr FINAL tr tr FINAL drEcrRrcar: tr TEMP. POWER MECHANICAL: tr HEATING - tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT E SUPPLY AIR -tr_ trirFrNAL tr FINAL /'PPROVED IRECTIONS: tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOB tl TILE COPY ApFn"osEFFtB e 1998 3. A request for a density variance from Section 12-78-13, to allow for the construction of a two-bedroom dwelling unit, located at 227 Wall Street (Hong Kong)/Lot B & C, Block 5C, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: ASI Vail Land Holding, L.L.C., c/o Base Mountain Sports - Brett Barnett, represented by Kathy LangenwalterPlanner: George Ruther Galen Aasland recused himself. Greg Moffet disclosed that he sold advertising to the applicant, but felt that it was not a conflict. Greg Amsden disclosed that he knew Richard Rosen, but saw no conflict. Ann Bishop disclosed that she once had an office in Wall Street Building, but saw no conflict. George Ruther disclosed that he was purchasing a home from Richard Rosen, but that it didn't influence his decision, to recommend denial. He then gave an overview of the staff memo. George said notification was mailed to the adjacent property owners on 12124197 and he then read for the record, the adjacent property owne/s list. He said the item was tabled, so additional notification could be made and that the notice was published on January 9, 1998. George then read from the code regarding notification and said that staff believed that all notifications had been made in accordance with the code. Greg Moffet advised that the agreement mentioned in the staff memo would not be discussed, since the PEC was not a Civil Court. Rick Rosen, an attorney representing ASl, Base Mountain Sports, explained that the applicant was here lo request a variance to allow for a residential dwelling unit, since the Master Plan encouraged increasing the bed base. He said that the variance section in the Town Code stated that variances were permitted to prevent practical difficulties or hardships resulting from the size or shape of the site. He said that this site was carved out and Bretl inherited it and that this variance would not be a problem to other structures or uses in the Core. He said the degree of relief would not be asking for a special privilege, as they were not asking for more square footage, just the right to go ahead with a residential unit. He said that anytime you grant a variance, you give a special privilege. He said, regarding light and air, that the applicant had the right to build up, so long as they didn't violate the height restrictions. Planning and Environmental Commission Mnutes January 26, 1998 Bretl Barnett, the Owner of Base Mountain Sports, explained that they were adding a 6-person additional bed base and that the building needed to be improved. Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. Jim Lamont asked George Ruther for the date this was platted. George Ruther said in 1979, it appeared this site was created out of a portion of the Lazier Arcade. Jim Lamont said there was nothing in the Town records saying it was platted. Mike Mollica said the parcel, if ever platted, appears to have been done afler July 1979. Jim Lamont requested title information and if this was a separute parcel. He asked Mike if the units per acre in the memo was an interpretation based on having a whole unit if it was a dwelling unil or a fraction of a whole unit in order to build an accommodation unit. Jim felt that part of the rationale to meet this code interpretation was of the magnitude of legislation for the Council, not the PEC. He said if there was not a whole unit, the property owner would be deprived of their right. Jim again said an interprelative matter needed a legislative remedy. He stated that light and air came into play under the conditional use pefmit. He said that issues of view were not at play, but light and air were. Jim said ihe EVHA argued that the Core had to be a mixed use of commercial with residential. Greg Amsden stated thal any upward building beyond the second floor required a conditional use, except office space. Jim Lamont said to check the code: thal commercial use and residenlial uses needed a conditional use. He said there was an appearance of rendering an opinion in the memo on the agreement that was decided was not an issue of the Town's. Jim said that until the standing of the subdivision was resolved, the zoning density could not be determined. He asked how staff could arrive at their numbers, wiihout knowing how it was zoned. James Kurtz-Phelan, an attomey fepresenting the owners of unit #308 and #309, thought it was important that the applicant intended to build another story which flowed out of the variance request. He said the issue of light and air must be considered, as it did have a negative impact on the units and would affect their use. He said granting the variance required a finding that the granting would not be materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. He brought up the letter from Amy Jorgensen-Conlee stating that other variance requests had been turned down. John Schofield asked for specifics of who had been turned down. James Kurtz-Phelan said he didn't know, he was just quoting Amy's letter. Rich Traverse, an attorney representing the Lodge Condominium, stated there was no hardship that had been mentioned here and if approved, it would be setting a dangerous precedent. Jack Curtin, representing Mrs. Hill who was the President of the Condo Association at 244 Wall Street, stated with property rights, if a variance created a density change, then all the owners would like to have it in writing, as they would like the same thing. He said the One Vail Place owners would like to have that same change, if approved and that if approved, the owners would go io Council to have the same privilege. Planning and Environmcntal Commission Mnutes January 26, 1998 Greg Amsden said each variance request needed to be reviewed on iis own merits. Jack Curtin said this variance would create a significant density increase of 7%. Greg Moffet reiterated that it should be presented then, not now. Mike Mollica stated that mixed use development was encouraged in the Core, but that there was no requirement that stipulated mixed use on a particular property. George Ruther read the code regarding allowed conditional uses. He said the need for a conditional use permit would depend on the primary access; whether it was on ground level or up stairs. George also said he couldn't find when this property was subdivided, but that it was subdivided prior to 1986. George said a way to resolve the platting issue was to allow the applicants time to research it by tabling this item. He said the acreage figures came off an lmprovement Location Certificate and also, that zero setbacks were permitted. Greg Moffet clarified thal if access was by the 2nd story, then it was a use by right. He said that uses on the 3rd story require a conditional use permit. Jim Lamont asked if there was sufficient agreement on the site area. George Ruther entered it into the record, an ILG submitied by Johnson Kunkle Associales. Jim Lamont asked where the main entrance would be for this project. Mike Mollica stated thai the applicant was not required to submit drawings at this time. Jim Lamont asked about building a whole unit. Mike Mollica read from the code, that 25 units are allowed per acre and that the definition of accommodation unit was very clear. Jim Lamont said it needed to be made clear that the applicant didn't have a whole unit. Rick Rosen said staff was correct regarding accessing by either the 2nd vs. the 3rd floor. He said the project would be accessed by Eaton Plaza , which is the 2nd floor. He said there were specific SDD districts which deviated from the density requirements, but that process causes more controversary. John Schofield asked if the applicant had looked elsewhere to trade 130 sq. ft. with the Town. He said the owners do have the right to go up. Greg Amsden said he cEn't see a reason to grunt a variance to absorb that 130 sq. ft. and so he recommended an AU, an EHU, or locate that land elsewhere for a trade. Rick Rosen asked that this item be tabled in order to talk with the Town. John Schofield made a motion to table this until February 23, 1998. Ann Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0-1. Planning and Environmental Commission Mnutes January 26, 1998 Ann Bishop asked staff to make sure this was being calculated in the proper manner and would also like the comments of the adjacent homeowners. Rich Rosen stated they had talked to the property owners. Mike Mollica offered to answer any queslions that the PEC needed answering, or to meet with any of the PEC members. Ann Bishop stated that this project was fairly complex. Diane Golden said the PEC's hands were tied, but she would like to see EHU's. Greg Moffet said he sees a clear use by right. He said, as it related to a DU, he didn't see how it was not a grant of special privilege and that the lot being too small was not a hardship. Brett Barnett asked what the difference was between a variance and a special privilege. Greg Moffet explained that you had to establish that granting a variance was not a special privilege. He gave the example of Pepi's application; that if a storm sewer went through the property, it was a hardship. Kathy Langenwaltef asked why Pepi was allowed to build. Greg Moffet said he was building a lot of AU's. George Ruther said that 27o/o ot the buildable lot area for Pepi's was in a floodplain which satisfied the finding of a physical hardship. Planning and Environmental Commission Mnutes January 26, 1998 t t Ftd. t c&P y 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39 FAX 303-479-2452 D e partment of C omnunity D eve lopment February 9, 1994 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Davey Wilson, Manager Hong Kong Gafe 227 WallSlreet Vail, CO 81657 RE: Two illegal banners at the Hong Kong Cafe Dear Davy: I am writing this letter to iust remind you that putting banners outside of the Hong Kong Cale is not allowed under the Town ol Vail Sign Code. Banners are only allowed for special evenls which etfect the entire community. These events require a special events permit which is reviewed by the Town Clerk's Office and other Town of Vail Departments. In addition, I have enclosed the sign code sections related to chalk boards and menu boxes, Your business is allowed one chalkboard and one display box. I have noticed one additional daily special board outside by the menu box. I need to emphasize that if the banners or additional menu boards are put up again, our slatf will have no choice but to cite you for the Sign Code violation. We prefer to explain the rules to a business owner and then rely on their cooperation to comply with the sign code. It I can be of any further assistance to you or answer any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at 479-2138. Have a greal ski season! Sincerely, Kti+'^ ?h Kristan PriE Community Developmenl Director xc: Planners ";+r Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone ,"," l\ 14 4 \ Project Application .( t: Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone; Legal Description: Lot B lock Filing Zone - Com ments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: D ISAPPROVAL l\t) Summary: $ .,t, Approval -E-nF Gntl L16 fff o A,rr.. .", : slggl PUBLIC HEARING Date: rNTER- DEPARTI'IENTAL REVI EW PROJECT: DATE SUBI'{I COUUENTS NEEDED BY: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE POSAL: PUBLIC WORI(S Revlewed by: Conrnents: 1l'^r7 ./;),-e r// r--"J \ r 3,(ov* d daur' Ut+*k o^ z-l s' l.o,J rt, ) Revlewed by: Comments: Comments: Coroments: POLICE DEPARTMENT RevLewed by: _ Date: Date: RECBXATTON DEPARTHENTRevlewed by: -. revlEed 3/LL/9L Date: 'sNowDoN & HOPKTNS AgcHtTECTS,. ,ii.: SItFIB"J t,LETT|B @F T',RANSnfl ITTAL TO (303) 476-220r > WE ARE SENDTNG yOU ff ettactreO E Under separate cover via ^\"e;nt'$ etans E Samples D Change order E the following items: ! Specifications! Shop drawings tr Copy of letter E For approval d Fo, you,. ,se SAs requested ,[ For review and comment tr tr FOR BIDS DUE I Approved as submitted 0 Approved as noted I Returned for corrections E Resubmit_copies for approval tr Submit_copies for distribution E Return -corrected prints 19- ! PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS SIGNED: THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked betow: Piooucrtas? /@ hc, e.dd. rs orl,l ,t adcro5u.ar ,.r rot rs noted, kindlrt notilyt ua at oncc. 'urto rr roig "r4@it ml qua r0zz-9zf (808) zsgr8 00vuo10c "ilv 0^lro leerc eroe I0z ,r,r.3ili[HfrB['o* ------3rvo. A8 03XC3HC I Project Application Date Proiect Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner. Address and Phone: Archilect, Address and Phone: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL D ISAPPROVAL b a,uW1 D Stati Approval {anrlw lPnn Yotnrtrna ' Uqb I c,ttroll D rE lfflftuIPP!I lroN/ffiN,rNo r?PLl9lllroN (Plcaaa NN{I OF NN{E OT IDDRESS NAXE OT ADDRE9 ftontrml ot lpclTroN or DESCRIPTtrON t Prlnt or tlpe) PAqtEqI PERSOH EUBUITTIHE ONE -01r a OH OTI|lR DROJECT /, OF DR*TECT THE foLIsl{INc INFoRHAIIoN IE BEQUjIEED FgR SUBHIITAL EI TllE APPI,ICNIT PRIOR EO THE REQUESi EETNC SCHEDUIID BEFORE THE DESIGII REVIEW BOARD. I. DE9CRIPTION OF T}TE PROJECTING, ETC}, SICN/AWNXNC (FREE ET}}IDINCT l{ALIJt INCIJI]DE BIGN XESSAEE. ll EIGN OR IWNING I{ATERIAL EIZE OF OVERALL EICN,SIZE OF I.ESTERING AIID I.OGO thtt, , HEIGHT OT DESCRtrBE SIGN TBOVE CRADE TENGTH Or BUSINESB tnoHTAcE (nll CONDOT{INIUI{ ASSOCIATI9N APPROVAI' 4r trEE: t20.00 PLus $1.00 PER SQUARE rooT 0F SIGf, AREA' PAII) c. D. E. F. G. B. LIcHSrHS (EXTSIINC 1. - 2.- 3r-{.-F.-6.- Sltc Planiilu"iioih rhovlnE txatrt locatlon of ;lgn or lmlnel on thl bulldlngir,il6iriilrs- itroring pioporcd locatlon Colorrd lcalr drawlng Sauplr o! Droporrd Datcrla1r Dhotograph- ot- llgn lf rvrllablr otfltER OR FIXED Date: Cllent: Area: SPECIFTCATIONS q -1c, -q \\ ".. ILAJ\e-? Er=ar+:fu| I MFGR: $".*'=l ca *,J coNTAcTs (L,Z) -,*,- 'l l2t - ttta ' ilI r, ri- t--, rq |l-T-tNr.1 I I I t \Ufc. NO. z L17xJ_- r9rsrzE: (O''* 7 o, CoLoR: bdUrt* t t'b,A/--r.t= DESCRII{IXON: TINISH! NOTES: }.5a ',*) i .l \'--4 c=::.'tr r'j (zr I =-/+-_-1! \-,, I ril-1.i_* Unit Cost:Revislon Date: Cost:Total EI Pendants downlight & wall wash series 4000s/H Used commercially lor years in restaurants, showrooms and offices, these f ixtureE work equally well in residential applications and are widely used in kitchens, dining rooms, playrooms, children's rooms and work areas, Available in downlight pendant or wall wash, these tixtures are beautif u lly engineered to provide e{f icient, eve n, wide. spread illumination. In addition to the familiar standard dome shape, avail- able in 5 sizes, we have 4 other. styles ts choose f rom, Hang them in rows, in groups or by themselves. On a cord, a chain or on a stem. Wall wash lixtures can be hung from the ceiling or stem mounled f rom the wall, Finishes: White porcelain shade and reflector. Electrical: I feet of black or white 3 conductor cord and 5" diameter semi-gloss white canopy. Custom opllons: Special mounting, matched color, black qoil cord and wire protective guard with or without hand hote. Potished chrome available on special order in large quantities. HamGiUin Lrghtirrg 305 E 60 Street Ne"r York, N.Y, 10024 21?_-v51-71.1Q 'Silvered bulb inside trosted o ASSOCTATES ilr . 1516 BLAKE ST, . D!NVER, CO. 80202 . pHONE 5ad.4444 i,)i\ \o ,N -r '.1 J-.lfi.\\:d\ '.\-,,, --t--.t \ \-sTe !e Es {i$i i+ t+ sag =s- s. 'S't-!+-s.FR \c ;TFi+ rO+rs=\) EeRE-G= A ; .K- .Sss.- t\-<i Ss-s-\ rt. ' G c.: \)+- -rJ-,= \S *-='>GS\5 SC.3 ,! IT-f:r.ttr\t*?:.ii11 n J' rt?i +. i;,!: : (fi r',n1 "[-.r r-YS $ {( * ll s."t*q\{}tl N.-r_\.srs ,l-\1$ I\sa / it '\ ...Mi $i$-J { 'i' di t+st. \-rItN {N$ ,O', \J/ -.- .--\. --.. 'i'' l'" i lsr- r3'i *)_ r,J,.st $..{r-1-a rt SSs "t ,-_ { ut Iu-r 'r-7(n ,\) \ -l +-,- \ I ( r\\ .t ;- \t\\' .-, {, .l r -r' \\ \ t\ i'rt :r! li -, " t , f-', 'l, -,*-\ $tr'l rl i \\'.1 x11rfit. **\\r'., ,l .irr 'l \\-{-l rl.t|r I j'r.i fti . il:L \ \)1? {:Lt *,0T -l-"q $\r- l_{ trr J *{I -\< $$($* t:l$r $u t r{ al- {\{ "l r $$'ll F-{1{ \\\ .N {.1r .-1=s t r-'.. s,i5!s \r_, s. *-^* .\*-jl = +l\Sqs s9 NS ,FJF -\-<t \-.'- EE B.trs-d' Ss t EXEMPTED SIGNS Chapter 16.24 EXEMTTED SIGNS Sections: 16.24.010 Designated. 16.24.010 Designated. The provisions of this title shall not apply to the following signs: A. lVlernorial signs or tablets, names of buildings and date of erection when cut into any masonry surface; B. Ofhcial governmental notices ?nd notices posted by govemmental officers in the performance of their duties, governmental signs to control traffic or for other reguiatory purposes, or to identify streets, or to warn of danger; C. Works cf fine art, as defined in Chapter 16.04, which in no way identify or advertise a product or business; D. Temporary decorations or displays, when they are clearly incidental to and are customarily and commonly associated with any national, local or religious holiday or celebration; provided, that such decorations are maintained in an attractive condition and do not constitute a fire hazard. as determined by the administrator, subject to review by the design review board; E. Temporary or permanent signs erected by public utility companies or construction companies to warn of danger or hazardous conditions, inciuding signs indicating the presence o[ underground cables, gas lines and similar devices; and F. Signs displayed on trucks, buses, trailers or other vehicles which are being operated or stored in the normal course of a business, indicating the name of the owner, business and location, rvhich are applied to moving vans, delivery trucks, rcntal trucks and trailers and the likel provided, that the primary purpose of the vehicles is not for the display of signs, and provided that they are parked or stored in areas appropriate to their use as vehicles. (Ord.9(1973) $ l?.) 256-23 (Vr;l7-2lrt2, FRG'E CT SPE CtrFI C,AITONS 'Date: q-Zaal ClLent: Area: lp.ttw 5ll'h*-l ![FGR: U*1 AJ"l v.Jnb surp ro: \^1.=-rlcnl- al l=i.eEb FNve-, b- eeb CONTACTs (4b- la,,e t r''u&M: A'+J'nlq . DESCRTHTTo$: A | ._ 2L'b"lv% r{Ic. No.: 4ffi ISIZEc 4 r^trpe X 4vt1 .\',b*t'llt/ V 3 tht*f LDo..;= Cost F+sr (. IJL 1007cAcrylic Woven Marine Fabric GLEN RAVEN r',lrUlS, rr.rC. Ll a 46 inches u ide. 9.2i: or.rnc*s per -oquare yard. o Solution d.ved to give exce)lent fade and u'eather resist.ance. o Put up in 50 yald rolls and 300 1'ard ca rtons, o Also atailable in rrrde val l(': \ of str: pes. O , il-,-t-. OsLnDtelta' 4601 . Pacific B 4602 - Sunflower Yellow !637 - Forest Green* 4600. Erin Green 4638 ' Coral*4639 - Mauve* 4603 -Jockey Red 4604 . Natural 4605 . Hemlock Tweed 4606 - Dubonnet Trveed 4607 . Charcoal Tweed 4608 . Jet Black 4609 .Orange 4610 . Turquoise 4611 -Sea Spray 4613 - Brou'n*New Colors MOrUfR,r',: i,. .i I I ii-'. i :, october 7, 1988 Mr. Rick Pylman c / o 'I'own or v al- r 75 So. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: HONG KONG CAFE REMODEL@ Dear Rick, As illustrated on the enclosed drawing, we are proposing some remodeling to the Hong Kong Cafe. Primarily, we areproposing the removal of the stairway at the north wall Ieading from the bar to restaurant level. This revision calls for a new second exi-t from the barlevel. We propose to do this by adding a new entry at the southeast corner of the building. This will reguire some reworking of the patio area andstairs that occur on Town of Vail property. We are requesting the council's permission to alter the Iease agreement as .it presently reads Lo allow for this change. Thank you for your assistance on this matter. MAH/lmh Sincere I Planning and Environmental Commission November 14, L9g8 PRESENT ETEiESonovan Bryan Hobbs Pan Hopkins Peggy Osterfoss Grant Riva Jim Viele ABSENTsfGnurtz The meeting was cal1ed to order by STAFF PRESENTPeter PattenKristan PritzRick {rltnanMike Mollica Betsy Rosolack the chairman, Jim Viele. 1. 2. Diana requested a rnoved that aII ofBryan seconded the Rick Pylnan Diana moved stated that theand seconded change on page 3 of the minutes of g/LZ and.the above rninutes be approved as corrected.motion and the vote was 6-0. exterior alter tion in I Core f for applicants wish to table the itento table. Vote was 6-0 in favor est for side front setback variances and fo ae in order to construct an addit onresidenceBiqhorn Estatescant: Ro and et Mccue Betsy Rosolack presented the proposal . she stated that thestaff recornmendation was for appioval of the side setback andsite coverage variances, uut aenial for the front setbackvari-ance since ttre front setback included a request foradditional GRFA through the 2so ordinance. Bir-r pierce,architect for the applicants, stated. that the McCues hadoriginally planned to ask for more GRFA, but had reduced thereguest at the advice of the staff. siit stated that the Townhad inposed duplex zoning on the property even though it dienot comply with the zoning regulalions. He pointed out thatanything constructed on Lot 3 would be in thl setbacks. Bill then added that the kitchen addition would be constructedtotally under the existing roof. He read a retter frorn theneighbor to the west, Joh; v. Seaman, givi"g-his-ipprovar oethe reguest and of further conternprai.ea adaitions.-- Birrstated that there qrere physicar hlrdships which included thesnall size of the lot and the fact that construction anlmhereon the lot would entail a required variance. 4. crant Riva stated that he had no objections to the variance reguests. Peggy felt that although the request was a minor one, it, was difficult to know where to draw the line. She saidthat her understanding was that with the 250 ordinance. there were to be no variances. She did feel that redesigning thekitchen would be the thing to do. Diana supported Peggy's concern. Pan felt that since the roof already existing, she did not have any problern with thereguest. Jin did not have any problens with the reguest. Grant moved and Bryan seconded to approve the side, front andsite coverage variances. The vote was 4-2 with Peggy and Dianavoting against the reguests. st for an amendment to eV Code too and Breakfast o cts. Applicant: Town of Vail Peter Patten presented the proposal . He described thedefinition of Bed and Breakfast (L8.04.035), regulations for Bed and Breakfast operations (18.58.3L0) and additions to Single Family, Prirnary/Secondary and Duplex lists of conditional uses. Peter then reviewed the criteria for arnending the zoning code and the Land Use Plan policies related to the reguest. He pointed out that since each Bed and Breakfast application would have to go through the conditional use process, the PEC would be able to add conditions of approval, if they so desired. He also pointed out that the staff felt the adjoining duplex owner should be notified. Peter stated that the staff recommended approval of the amendment. Parn felt that each B&B should be reviewed annually. Peter responded that the PEC could place that stipulation upon the cu approval . He added that the PEc could also place a stipulation on the approval that stated rrlf rnore than one complaint, the approval will be called up for review. r' Diana suggestedplacing a time frame or timiting the number of complaints that would necessitate an autornatic review. She htondered if tbe process could be moved up so that tbose already in business could rent when the ski season started. Peter explained that they hadn't planned on having those already in business, but that those businesses would be grandfathered. Peggy felt that at least initially, the applicant should come through the PEC, and that those who needed review because of cornplaintsf etc, could reviewed by the staff. Grant felt it was a good idea that at least initially, the applicants cone before the PEC, and Jirn agreed. Diana rnoved and Grant seconded to reconmend approval to the Town council per the staff memo, with clarification ofrradjacent property ohtnerrr and with the stipulation that the 1e Secondarv and Duplex zone TO: FROM: DATE: Planning and Environmental Commission Cornmunity Development Department December 1_2, L98g suB"TEcr: Reguest for a minor exterior alteration on part ofLot C, Block SC, Vail Village First Filing 1n orderto construct a srnal} addition to the existing HongKong Bar and Restaurant.Applicant: phil Hoversten I. THE PROPOSAL The appricant is proposing an r-8 square foot addition tothe southeast corner of the upper Ievel of the Hong Kongcafe building. The southeast corner of the buildiig is-currelt1y cut back at a 45 degree angle and was designedin this manner to alLow some open space and land.s"apingand to reduce site coverage of the Luilding. Theappricant wishes to square off a portion oi ttris corner inorder to add another entrance to the building. The actualentrance would be in the existing anglea watl thatcurrently contains window openings just to the west of thecorner of the building. By adding an entrance in thislocation, the owner would Lhen be-able to remove one ofthe interior staircases and still meet building codeegress requirements. The area that the applicant desires to enclose currentlyexists at that cornei as a sky light at grade level whichallows light into the lower restaurant 1eve1 . There arealso severar mature aspen trees which provide a buffer tothat corner of the building fron the Founders, praza area.The.applicant feels that these aspen trees may be savedduring the construction. II. COMPLTANCE WITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF THE CCI ZONE The commercial core r zone district is intended to providesites and to rnaintain the unique character of the VaiIVillage cornmerciar area, with-its mixture of lodges andcommercial estabrishments in a predominantly ped6strianenvironment. The commerciar coie r districi is intendedto ensure adequate light, air, open space and otheramenities appropriate to tne perinitte-ir types of buirdingsand uses. The district regulat,ions in al-coraance with {hevail village urban Design pLan and Design considerations- - prescribe site developrnent standards ttrit are intended toensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightlycrustered arrangements of uuitaings fronting on pedeslrianways and pubric areenways, and to ensure coitinultion oithe building scale and irchitectural qualities thatdistinguish the ViIIage. This.proposal, as a minor addition, is in cornpliance r+iththe intent of the purpose of the CCI zone dislrict. III. 9gYglrNcE wrrH rHE VILLAGE There are no sub-area concepts which relate directly tothis area of the proposal . IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATTONS FOR VAIL VILI,AGE The purposes of the comparison between the proposal andthe considerations is to show how the new designstrengthens or detracts from the overall intent of theDesign Considerations. Pedestrianization The Hong Kong Cafe is located adjacent to two najorpedestrian areas: Wal1 Street, which is a majorpedestrian walkway, and Founders, pLaza, which is arnain pedestrian plaza area. The staff felt that theoriginal Hong Kong Cafe project had positive impactson pedestrianization on both WaLI Street and theFounders' Plaza. We did feel_ strongly that thedevelopment should maintain sorne buffering fron thePlaza and frorn Wall Street on the southeast corner.The staff feels that this is an important pedestrianarea which needs and benefits frorn the existingIandscape buffer. We feel that the proposed minoraddition in and of itself is not detrirnental to thisconcept, but would request a guarantee that theexisting landscaping remain in place during and afterconstruction. Vehicular Penetration This urinor addition will have no inpact uponvehicular penetration within the Vail village area. Streetscape Framework The_streetscape framework criteria speaks to thepositive contributions of the infill of comrnercialstore fronts and expansion of existing buildings inorder to generate street life and visuat intertstalong pedestrian routes. The criteria, however, alsorefers to the irnportance of landscaping, gtrass,flowers, and tree planting as a sofl fiarneworklinkage along pedestrian ioutes. The staff feels A. B. c. D. E. tl G, H. I. that the southeast corner of the Hong Kong Cafe asexisting, .benefits the pedestrian experience throughthe existing landscaping. The angle of the buildingand the existing landscaping contribute to thepedestrJ-an experience as one is approaching thebuilding frorn WalI Street. The stepping eifect ofthe building presents a dramatic opening intoFounders' Plaza and we feel serves i.ts purpose well.Although the addition does encroach somewhat intothis open area, it does not substantially impact theexisting design. Street Enclosure This proposal has littIe impact on street enclosure. Street Edqe The _street edge criteria encourag'es building designto form a strong but irregular edge to the itreet.The staff feels that from an urban design aspect,the existing corner of the Hong Kong caie dols a finejob of meeting this criteria. The proposed additionhas little impact on the existing design with regardto street edge. Buildinq Heiqht This proposal has no inpact on building height. Views There is no impact from Service and Delivery No inpact. Sun/Shade No impact. this proposaL on views. ZONING CONSIDERATTONS A. Landscapinq Section L8.24.1_70 of the CCI zone district statesthat trno reduction in landscaped area shall bepermitted without sufficient cause as shown by theapplicant or as specified in the Vail village DesignConsiderations. The applicant has stated that this addition may beaccomplished without removing any of the exist3.ng tt B. c. landscaping. The construction of the proposedaddition is extrerneJ.y close to the ex:.ltinglandscaping, and the staff feels that, if approved,the applicant should be reguired to guarantee theexisting landscaping. Proiect Statistics Lot size for the Hong Kong Cafe Buitding is I,608 sf. Existing site coverage is 9O* which is over theallowable maximum of 808 site coverage erithin CCI .This proposal does not actually increase sitecoverage, as it is a second story addition over theexisting dining roon. Parkinq Parking reirnbursement will be deterrnined at buildingpermit. Parking fees will be assessed and paid intothe parking fund for all square footage tnai isadded. VI . STAFF RECOMMENDATION Although we feel this small addition provides no positiveimpacts for the building, the staff recommendatio-n forthis request is for approval . Although we feel that theexisting design of the- southeast corner of the Hong KongCafe_is_superior to the proposal from an urban designstandpoint, we feel that the impacts are too minimal towarrant a reconmendation of denial . We would request thatthe Planning and Environmental Conmission place Jcondition on the approval that guarantees that theexisting landscaping will be either maintained or replacedduring construction of the addition. g I I a)[)o I | &p^rt- e-lat11 q or.-icLc4e :LeC o?H.1/,'\ ./\ Existing Bar Ne .v 1,ng, - 2b.j14 C ,^t '/(r,'4 E ,an'* 41-(+ tfr,le- ?6t;.a*5 ex,<.f, vrrrpowa )l i''i li I'*il'-l?:A*'Ta r.,'\f t.\ 7xt.i1, .. tIfl Nev Floaa - 2,i,..d4" _p1o.qaLLoy,J\ErAL re-w crt_, i, /i*., bxr+i. 4rrnu .- 4-* - --. Fx rsT ;ar.rc -t 4 3€r,.a-q r r- f"."-\1' tt*o. t'Atlf , €xl<-t GA M.. -) -- \ : .-J zt,, ! Existing pa tio. IJ4 r 1'-o' t oannPI ing and Environmental Commission December l-2, 1,988 Diana Donovan Bryan Hobbs Pam Hopkins Peggy OsterfossGrant Rivasid schultzJin Viele The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Jirn VieLe. l-. Approval of ninutes of i_l_,/L4 and 11128. Bryan Hobbs moved and Jirn viele seconded to approve the minutes.The vote \.ras 7-0 in favor. 2.Ar est t t1 annexed arcel commonly known AS e UIb l-6 and L9, to Hillside Res I Rick Pylrnan pres request. He stressed that this was STAFF PRESENTPeter PattenRick pyhnan l4i-ke Mollica Diana Donovan The vote was moved and Peggy seconded to approve the zoning.7-o in. fa 3.Are st or an exterio aI ti-on in Cornmercial Cofore Hon Cafe. 1 Hov not a subdivision request at this time. Furthermore, the staffreconmendation of approvar was not a grrarantee of a specificdensity or level of development, nor guarantees that theproposed access to the property will iernain unchanged. Jay Petersonf.representing the applicant, had nothing to add tothe presentation. Rick.presented tEe request. He exprained that the area that theapplicant wished to enclose currenlly existed as a sky light atgrade level which allowed J-ight into-the lower restaurant level.He stated that the existing landscaping wou1d. be saved. Rickalso added that the staff requested- th;t the existingIandscaping be preserved as i condition of approval. Hereviewed the memo, listing the criteria of aiirovat. Mike. Hazard, representing the owner, agreed to guarantee thenarntenance of the landscaping. Diana moved foi approvar withtwo conditions. 1) A 2-yelr guarantee of the trees-and 2) thatthe DRB review the rands-apinq. peggy seconded the motion. Thevote was unanimously in favor. PRESENT Ifo4.oonestr a condorniniun conversi for the Bell Tower Bell Tower Associates fnc. Rick Py1nan presented the request. He stated that the applicant had agreed to restrict the housing units for employee housingfor l-5 years for R3 and R4. Rick reviewed the criteria andstated that all building code reguirements must be met. Jay Peterson stated that the building was not rrentirelyrr up to code. Peter Patten clarified the employee housing question. Diana moved and Grant seconded to approve the request per thestaff memo with two conditions: 1) final condominiumdeclarations to be recorded must contain appropriate languagerestricting Units R-2 and R-3. This language will be reviewed by Town staff prior to recording. 2) The applicant mustsatisfy the building inspection report reguirements. The vote was 7-0 in favor. 5. Preliminary hearing to determine review period for exterior alterations in Comrnercial Core I. l,Iike Mollica presented the Sitzrnark Lodge appJ-ication and recommended a 60-day study period. Diana moved and Grant seconded to approve a 60-day process for the Sitzmark. The vote was 7-0 in favor. Discussion followed concerning exterior alteration reviewperiods. Sid questioned whether there should be a restricted time period in which ccl exterior alterations can be considered. Diana felt applicants should plan ahead. Peter felt that if the change is significant, the Novernber and May deadlines usually worked. He felt it rnight be a hardship for snaller projects, however. Jirn felt there rnay be room to rrliberalize the windowrr for subnittals, possibly keeping construction out of the busyperiods. Peter stated that the present nethod worked well for regulating the construction when there were many projects. Diana suggested putting a notice in the newspaper as a rerninder to those who may be contemplating construction. Hospital Expansion Discussion Pam asked about height linitations. Peter responded that there were no development standards, but that the PEC reviews a site master plan and q develop standards for the long run on this site. Diana felt only one parking structure was needed, not two. DESTGN REVTEW DECEI{BER 3:00 BOARD AGENDA2L, L988 P.M. SITE VISITS2:45 P.M. 1.Hong Kong AdditionVail village (Fina1) STAFF ABSENT GrftVtb\/ * t^4-:'nz-'^.) 5/Jr€'/ - lrz'4-f) ,\fffu'vs'p n2 :,r6'4lT<D ?-o STAFF PRESENT STATF APPROVALS: Gold of Vail Awning - Vail Vi1lage.fnn, formerly Alpine GoldWicked West storefiont Repaint --l_,ionsheua-ii"ii' " Island Water Sports Signs - A & D BuildingArnesen Fine Art, Ltd. Sign - Treetops Coirn. B1dg. Project Application ProJect Name: Pro ject Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Arch ilect. Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Com ments: B lock Filing Zone - Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL D ISAPPROVAL Town Plan ner !Staff Approval tu i' T{fkt}'{ 0F LJg r [_ Pliscel lares.rs f,sh Ir9-18-tL 14:4f,:58, E*reipt * Eff$lf;: F'.--':,lr"rnt. # t:li * {,1S9 st't[httlflil gHi:, HIrFF; I I'j5'...SFFL I l:pTI $t{ FEES Hrrl':un i ?+nds red :' ??, :Et Iiem paid Rnowrl peid ft18*ff*411f,8F-18* 58. EE n 1$r-1ff84141 SRSF :it . :lfi i:h€ng* r* lr:rn*,J ,! g, Lli:t THFIhI|< lfffU \'t*u r ':.tsh i er Jilfrt/ TOWN OF'VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SALESACTIONFORM '-'/ / //"' / (1 )DATE: / / /- L I 0l 000041330 0l 0000 41540 0r 000042415 I]NIFORM PLIJMBING CODE 01000042415 0l 0000 42415 01 0000 42415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 0l 0000 42415 01000041548 0l 0000 42412 )GROX COPIES /STUDIES 0l 0000 41412 01000041330 0r 000041413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE 'f .t .a?; TPPIIC.f,TION DATE II GN /I}-NI}IO IDPI.TCITIOH (Plcase NN{E OT TN{E OT IDDRESB lftnE oF ADDRESS tlolltTsru ol IPCATION OF DEsCRIHTION Prlnt er 8y?c, PROJEqI DERSON SUBHITTTNC owlfER a -O/.f Orl|lR DROJECf, OF PRqTECT ) THE rOLIFI'IING IHFORHATIoH I8 BEoUTRED FoR SUEI-IITTAL BI TtlE IPPLICAIIT PRIOR TO trHE REQUEST EEINC SCHEDULED EEFORE TIIE DESICN REVIEW EOARD. I. DESCRTI{IION OT THE EIGN,/AWNING PROJECTING. ETC}, INCIUDE SIGN (FREE ETNIDING, TAI&, IGSSAGE. OR AI{NING I.I}TERIAI., EIZE OT I.ETTERING }lID IPGO B. C.SIZE OF O'trERALL HEICHT OT DESCRIBE F. G. ll . F SIGN ABOVE GR,ADE /, LIGKrING (EXISTrNG OR PROPOSED) {4[4/t( 5IGN,h,H. ,&: ,tfM n. 'Fl llt a D. 8. taNcTH oF BUSINES8 IROHTACE (rr) CO}IDOITINITIII ISSOCIATION IPPROVAL FEE: 120.00 PLUS 11.00 PER SQUAIE PooT l. - 2'-- 3.-l.-5.-6'- 81ta Dlaniilitli"iit thoulnE rxtct locatton of rlgn er awnlnE on th. bulldlng ir,Jt'Jgtiitri- itroulng P;oPoteil locatlon Coloridl rcalt drawlnE Sauplc gt DropotGd DltGrlalt Photograph ot- rlgn lf tvallablo i ,, l;J+l EIGN -h' \ $"1,{.N' )* *"1 $rtr -\\l i\i l; rl\l _\ $1.{ I -tt -\ ,N c\ $ \ \ r\*\ =l { \ t- I -'\ts lo\l- I Il' 7:n\, F _$ 1"-:l- *l .$- s-L '-1,1-1{ \i\-ri Nl {ttrl-r v .t$". {\, $:L u \_ $ "N {, Kj oo f llarrn\hw|"fr,' ?,r;rwai,qu' fa fu, rolsovtrA '//.t '.i r.-i,/ O "erri, ed 6/LB/9L COLORADO THIS }FPI,XCATION WILIT NOE gE ACCEPBEDuNlrl Arrrr REQUxAX fllt-Hrou-r d suBlt{rllED DRB APPLICATION - TOIIN OF VAIL, DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED IDATE OF DRB MEETING: ****rt**** P,F,OJECT INTORMATION : A. DESERTPTTON. TYPE OF REVIEW: c. D. jf property is <iescribdo bydescrip: io.n, please provide fiurJ!1! D > I LEGAL DESCRIPTION:T ^+ Subdivision NAME OF APPLICANT:Mailing Address: BIock a meet s and boundscn a separate sheet IegaI andattach io this applitation. /t IzONING:. lU I - LOT AREA: If requlred, applicant nust,sLamped survey showing tbt area: , a current ui H.NAME OF Mai l ing Phone APPLICANT'PRESENTATIAddress: J, 11 '#?'7,t,- $ 10,000s 50,000s 150,000s 500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000/ 000 0rn'!J f1l lsr i 2 19 gi DESCRIPTION: _.-New ConsLruction (9200.ool _,f,l uinor Alterat,ion ($20.00)Addition ($50,0O)Conceptuaf Review ($0) Phon'e NA.I.4E OF OWIIERS : *STGNATURE (g) :Mailing eddresl Ph nha Condominium Approval if applicabte, ?H i?:: ?1"^,ll:ll_?: "lo1l_above, are Lo be paid at,, qrg 9l!l:.,!.ll: of submir!iL of onn-ippiicarion.appr yinf ; ;. - ;-;; ; i; !";'o:H, i:'; i :::l"l;"". lil"fi,"n"n:iiy':::..::ry:iign or irrl p.opb"ti. --in"-i"ii-ir"vairy the will adjust. Lhe ree accoiolng-ii-the tabteensure the correct fee is paiO.-ensure the correct fee is paIa. FEE SCHEDULF; VALUATION (n'ru-,s 1.0,001 -$ 50,001 -Cl Rn nArv.|.j/V I VVJ. -$500,001 -$ Over rovidZ+. s500.00 $100,00 *NO AFPLICEIION WILL BE PROCESSED WITHOUI OWNER' S SIGNATURE NAME OF PROJECT: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONI LOT BLOCK 5A SUBDIVISION STREET ADDRESS: 7 DES0RIFTION OF PROJECT: I Thb foi towing Review Board informalion isbefore a final required approval subniltal be given:to the Designfor can A. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED BUILDING MATERIALS: Roof S iding 0:her WaIl Marerials Fa sc ia Soffits Wi ndows Window Trim Doors I\nnr 4'*i a Hand or Deek RaiIs Flues F I a shings Ch imneys Trash EncLosures Greenhouses t1.lrar LANDSCAPING: Name PLANT }4ATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES MA COLOR Qommon Name Ouantitv Size* ofD. Botanical Name /t/,,(---t---_-t-_\r * Indicate caliper for deciduous trees, I ndicat.e nmuyr . se s?nV( ._ Designer: Phone: PLANT r"rnrERrf : PROPOSED SHRUBS cornmorlame ouantitv Size* EXIS?ING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED * Indicate size5 qallon.of proposed shrubs. S-quar Footage GR,OUND COVERS qnn TYPE OT' IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OFEROSION CONTROL 0THER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaini:pool-s,-"t;:i"'ir"""" snF.^irr,,-"??-11r]!r fences, swimning l"ljl; *$::T::-n:lil!-;;_.'liri"Iii;i; i;:nl:;";iSiii : "i!; l,."i'it::,:;:: l:l; ;ilsillii'lii,i;:":;',:l:Tilil; rs 5 feet.i.t:":;.,Maximum i"ish.-ir";;ii""::l:;r:l: :;"ih"setback isproperty PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 12/8/86 COMMI SSI ON PRESENT Diana Donovan Byran Hobbs Peggy Osterfoss Duane Piper Sid Schultz Jim Viele ABSENT lah--nopfi ns Braun expl ai n request as l ong vote was 6-0 in est. Byran Hobbs moved and Hong Kong restaurant agreed STAFF PRESENT Peter Patten Tom Braun Betsy Rosolack Viele seconded to grant wjth the request. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Duane piper- Approval of minutes of llovember 24, .l996. A correction was made on item #3. Donovan moved and Viele seconded to approvethe minutes with the correction. The vote was 6-0 in favor. Con derat ion r a minor amendment o the Hon Kon Cafe opment aEe . 2- Tom the The as the favor. eal of a staff 't s'l 0n concernt n the i EZmar tch tation of street lev Duane Piper moved to the audience and Jim viele chaired th.i s .i tem. peter Patten explained that the Sitzmark wanted to expand an existing office spacewhich the staff believes is a nonconforming use because the spice is on lhefirst or street level . He pointed out tha[ there were many situations similarto the one at Sitzmark, such as the plaza Lodge shops, the east side of theBell _Tower-Building and the Fountain cafe in itre creetside Building. Theapplicant is appealing the interpretat'ion of street level and feel the officeis on the second level . Duane Piper, representing the applicant, felt this was more a consjderatjon ofdegree. He felt that many of the exampies shown to be similar were lessextreme than that of the Sitzmark, the greatest difference.i n grade being 4,asopposed to the 8 feet at the Sitzmark. He added that if this ilas f.i rst i1 oor,then there must be a basement. piper stated that there needed to be a moredefinitive explanation in the zoning code, for the street was well below thestreet level . Sid schultz said that it was difficult to look at the zoning code and try toapply floor levels as therein described. He felt that stre;t levels couid be a a request cati on o Ameni can t at a number of different levels in different p'l aces, but that the intent of the code was to have retai1 shops near the pedestrians. ldith the design of the berm, the intent at the Sitzmark was to get people off of the street. If the berm were removed, and shops placed at berm ievel , he would see jt as street I evel . Diana Donovan agreed with the staff memo. Byran Hobbs abstained. Peggy Osterfoss stated that she would like to see the code clarified, that technical ly, if one has to walk up 8 steps, it would be 2nd'leve'l , but she felt that the intent of the code was to interpret this as first level . She repeated that she would like to see a rewording of the definition. Jim Viele agreed that the definition needed to be cleaned up, but in the meantime would go along with the staff interpretation. Di ana Donovan moved and S retati on.e sta nti ons. 4.Pre'l iminary review of exterior alteration proposals for the following bu'i I di nss: a. b. c. d. e. I BUILDiNG Cl ock Tower Casino Building P'l aza Lodge Bel I Tower Lionshead Center Sitzmark Lodge LENGTH OF STUDY PERIOD 60 60 90 90 90 90 days days days days aays qays PEC L2/8/86 -?- Project Application Proiect Name: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Archilect. Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL D Statt Approval Project Application Project Name: Proiect Description: Conlacl Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board APPROVAL 'IDate . ; '' DISAPPROVAL E star Approval )t ^t+sttaputroHa vtl4ns?A1 amv dr>> 4qaa( /,?Yl+fft1k w:wTwa 41Ap+ r4wTma +law hlr/al-L HPN %II,IHA {2? flWY. aY I-?N ?Y#f NAWIa 3? 44',4?ltlq -Ia d>tarl Nf K"ryJd* afo\? aBTF v't/ atOt l17A ?av? u?Id 7x147fi1a wNwQlt+l1(?A?eh # qo.au' %t&lrta aAtp\??Qtfltib r vil ?aas4 t*vw-9-lp,4n" h fl?lAh7?ZD Ai-tr2ary\to? vr-fi?Affi ADPAIHt/4iltw 7?vt4?p 4sxrevYIhte ' ero;""t Application Project Name: Project Descriplion: Contact Person and Phone Description:bt 0 ,ar:"x , =r^" ful Comments: Design Review Board tlDil. .y*ltL DISAPPBOVAL 'l-.a *l I Motionby: h/ fg"1-) Seconded by: APPBOVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Env.i ronmental Commjssion Community Development Department March 10, 1986 Reguest for an exterior alterat.i on on part of Lot C, Block 5C,vaiI village 1st Filing, in order to construct a free stand.i ng twostory bui lding. Appl icant: Hong Kong Cafe partnership A.Al I ey Treatment I. INTRODUCTION The exterior alteration application for the Hong Kong cafe wasorigina1 1y heard by the pianning and Env.i ronmenlal C6mmission on l:llllrn to, .l986. During discussion of the p"oporii, three sign.ificantissues were raised, Those .i ssues are: 1. The aesthetic treatment of the a1 1ey way that wiil be createdbetween the Hong Kong building and the Lazier Wall Streer. bu il di ng. 2. Locatjon of trash facjljtjes for the Hong Kong cafe. 3. concern over enforcement of conditions requested by the owner ofthe third floor condominium in the Laz.i er wall Striet buildinq. Fo1'l owing discussion of these issues, the applicant requested the planning andEnvironmental commissiol !"!].. this froposai until the'March lOth meeiins""t - which time the applicant felt he wouid be better able to discuss these issues. IL AppLIcANT'S RESPONSE T0 ISSUES R The applicant has submitted drawings that indicate a six foot highfence with gate wilr be constructed from the Hong Kong nuiiaing Iothe.Lazier Building in order to encrose the altev wav. it ii t.n..wr l be constructed 9!-the same siding material as the proposedHong Kong cafe and will include a gat6 for access into the'a11eyway. Trash Faciljty Several alternatives for placement and handljng of the trashfacility were discussed jh the previous planniig conmissjon.meeting. Several of those alternatives invotvea ,.ii"n..-rponuti I i zati on of Lazi er property and,/or easements. The appl i canr,upon studying the situation, has decided it wourd oe ueii to teeptrash faciiities compretely independent of reriun."-rpon-oih.,properties. .The applicant is proposing to instalt a irisfr-compactor and trash storage room in the basement level oi il,l.proposed lons Kgng cafe building. The trash removar company wil ltake the trash directly from this room. No other exterior !tor"g"is involved in this proposal . This proposal , jf bujlt to oroo"r. c. standards, has been reviewed and approved by the Environnental Health Department. The applicant has contacted the trash company and has indicated to us that removal on an every other day basiswill be satisfactory to meet their needs. Requested Conditions Between Lazjer BuiIding Condominium Owner and Hong Kong Cafe Partnership At the February 24th meeting, an attorney for Mr. Edward Bleckner, the owner of Units 308 and 309, residential condominiums in the Lazier Arcade building, requested that the Planning and Environmental Commission place several conditions upon the approval of the Hong Kong Cafe Partnership. A'l though the Hong Kong Cafe Partnership had agreed to these conditions, Planning Commission felt uncomfortable in being placed in the position of enforcement. The attorneys for both parties have drawn up a contractual agreement detailing these conditions. This contract has been reviewed by the Town Attorney. Exterior Building Modifjcations Related to These Issues In order to comply with the contractual agreement with the owner of units 308/309 Lazier Arcade, the building height and sky lights have been sljghtly lowered. This change is reflected on re-submtted elevations. A1 I ingress/egress points have been eliminated from the Lazier al'l ey. All access points are located on HKC property, on the south elevation at the plaza level and on the northeast corner of the lower dining 1eve1 . The north elevation of the building, for a length of 16 feet- starting at the northeast corner, has been pulled back 8 inches to accommodate any future stairway that may be proposed for the Lazier aliey. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff feels that the issues discussed in the February 24th meeting have been adequately addressed and recommend approval for the exterior alterations of the Hong Kong cafe as submitted and modified. Staff would at this pojnt defer to the staff recommendation and requested conditjons outlined in the PEC memo dated February 24, 1986. D. III. t------:t1A'v ."-! il-- ---4g ------ -,-----' l fifrI l-,, t -* !: r/ |\,:-:t/ ,-/r .ri ii IL:-:l Berridge Associates, I nc. Planning . Landscape Architecture March 27, 1986 Craig Snowdon Snowdon and Hopkins 201 Gore Creek DriveVai1, Colorado 81657 RE: Tree Lransplanting for the Hong Kong Cafe Dear Craig: At your reguest I have prepared this letter describing some general transplanting procedures for the one l0' Spruce and the 6- 2" Aspen. It is my reconmendation and a preferred horticultural method to hand dj-g these trees rather than the useof a tree spade, It is almost impossible to take allthe roots of these trees but as a general rule the diameter of the root ball in feet should at leastequal the diameter of the trunk in inches. At the newsite, the previously dug receiving hole should be pre- pared with a mixture of peat moss, soil and a balancedorganic fertilizer, then mixed with water to form aslurry. The slurry mj-xture is forced to fill any voids around the root ba11, eliminating all of the air inthe pocket. The need for guying and staking of thesetrees will depend upon how tight the ball stays duringits move. Following its move the deciduous treesshould be pruned back to compensate for root loss. A standard watering schedule should then be esLablishedfor the first two years. 245 Vaf leio St. . San Francisco, California 941 1 1 . (41 5) 433-2351 1 000 So. Frontage Rd. West, Suite i 00 . Vait, Cotorado Bt 63Z . (303) 476-0851 Craig Snowdon March 27, L986 Page Two These are simply general guidelines for transplanting and shoul-d not be used as specific planting specifications. Transplanting is a shock to a tree under the best of cir- cumstances and is a job to be undertaken onl-y by exper- ienced nursery staff with adequate equipment. I would recommend Rocky Mountain Tree Experts of Denver,Colorado. They have had great success with transplantingtrees of all sizes in the Vail area. If you have any more questions or if I can be of anyfurther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sj-ncerely, BERRIDGE ASSOCIATES, INC,drr/*aM Dennis Anderson DAldb T OF MATERIALS NAME OF PROJECT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STREET ADDRESS: DESCRiPTION OF The fol'lowi ng Board before A. BUILDING Roof Si di ng MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL information is required for submitta'l by the applicant to the Design Review a final approval can be fiven: COLOR Fasci a Soffi ts I,li ndows I^lindow Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails . Fl ues ..r tasnlngs . Chi mneys Trash Enc'losures Greenhouses 0ther B. LANDSCAPING: Name Other lJa'l I Materi a'ls PLANT MATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES EXISTiNG TREES TO BE REMOVED Existing Treesto be trans-planted of Designer: Phone: Botanical Name Dennis Anderson Berridqe Associates, fnc. 303:476:0851 Common Name Ouani tv Size* Pofiulus Tr-emuloides Populus Tremuloi.des Picea PunsensGlauca Quaking fLi5P gr r Quaking A qrra ni-g=iL-Colorado Blue Spruce 3" Ca1. 2" Cal, r 72'. *Indicate caliper for deciducious trees, Indicate height for conjfers. (over) o 'A;1cads esEaLd ('cla's1ood 6ulrumlils'sasuaJ:'sl[pr"r 6u1u1e1ar) s3unIV3J 3dv]s0Nv1 ulHI0 '3 10ulN03 N0isOul l0 00HI3N u0 SdAI 'r.rralsr{s 6u11S1Xa esn N0IlV9iUUi' l0 ld^r nffc uu> su3A03 0Nn0u9 a6pJ-xool a.t*En6s . auld o6nw 9lr r\l - snq6n-hloqbnw snuTdu0E ,,8T 9 TTo+-t--@ - EsaJ'r{n:rJ-pa+uerdsue'rr-' frqqnrqs ETTT?uelod " , :' 3B 0l s8nuHs 9NIISIXS -1-iE5-r -r ..-ad.runT -Fat'trpEo-rE;rooupeorg EUTqES snradlunl.fej-S E euTf5n-m ---sn-q-nntrtJJe$o oq6n6 snurd 'TeOg B 11oganbu13 PsocTtrnrd SBNUHS dqqn*qg pTTTlua?ou (+,uoo)s4ts --Titupn0 . arxpN uourile aureN teriilEm :S'tVIU3lVt{ lNv'ld ,. LIST OF MATERIALS NAME OF PROJECT: LEOAL DESCRIPTION: STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF P Roof Siding Other t,lal'l Materi al s The fol lowing information is required for submittal Board before a final approval can be f.iven; A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL by the applicant to the Des'ign Review COLOR Fasci a Soffi ts !'|i ndows t^li ndow Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Fl ues Fl ashi ngs Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses 0the r B. LAN0SCAPING: Name PLANT MATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES dur Bota Desi gner: nhnna. nical Name Common Name Size*Quan'i ty EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED *Indicate caliper for deciducious trees. Indierto hoiahi fn,. .n',ifo,.. \',p.9 Date of Application January 2Zr 1qg6 Date of pEC Meeting February 24, tqg6 APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I.This procedure is requireduse permit. The appljcatjon will not be for any project required to obtain a condjtional accepted until all information is submitted. A. NAME OF APPLICANT e Partnershi ADDRESS p. O. g"x 2294, Vail, CO PH0N E_:1I6_I9ZQ_ E. FEE gt00 THE FEE MUST ACCEPT YOUR adjacent to the subject propertv and their mail ing addresses. OWNERS AND CORRECT ADDRESSES. B' NAME 0F APPLICANT's REPRESENTATIVE so"o* *o Hoor.in"-a.or,it ADDRESS fH0NE_!25_zeor C, NAME 0F 0I^JNER(S) (print or tJpe) Flone KonE Cafe 7, David K Ol.lNER(S) : SIGNATURE(S) ADDRESS D' L''ATI0N 0F pR'p0sAL: LEGAL- L0T--! BL.CK 5-c FILING w rsr ADDRESS e2T nast Watr Street, pxtoJn lsL cK #*3t17 av \rn0^-k n-(- -BE PAID BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I,JILLPROPOSAL. F. A list of t!g_1q1es of owners of ail property. INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STNEEiiiTHE APPL]CANT I,IILL BE RESPON'IiJIr rON CONNrii II. PRE-APPLICATION CLAUSE A PRE-APPLICATION CONF-ERENCE I,IITH A PLANNING-STAFF MEMBER iS STRONGLY SUGGESTEDT0 DETERMINE IF ANY-ADolrior'rnl-ir'iriinr'rlrrol is-nriorii."-ilii nppr-rcerr0N rlillBE ACCEPTED uNLEss-II I! couprEiE ii'iij'sr lnclloE-lti-irgi',is irrquiRED-Bi iHE'zorvrruc :,ADMINISTRAToR). IT-is rHEAtpliinr'ri; i"nispor'riierrii io-i,inre _4N_ApporNTMENT .il.lrrH THE STAFF T0 FrND oui nboui"iiooiiiOr..ret 'imr,.riiini"n'E00inEMENrs:- ...'-'.. i,PLEASE N0TE THAT A,qr||gF.llptIgAIIgI l,lrLL STREAMLTNE THE AppR0VAL pROcESsFOR Y0uR PR0JEcr ev OEcF-EAstre irli lluubEn cr ccruoiiiori5 0F AppRovAL THAT THE i t5i'-Hil.tlif;,YiitiS rALL coNDiiioi'is ijF'iFi;nolni"i'iuii'[i"c,iuprrED wrrH.BEFSRE A . / OVER A. A description of the precise nature of the proposed use and: its operiting charactlristic"l-""a-^Jl,=*u" proposed to makethe dse comparible wirh orhe.'pil;";IJ" i" itu'"i.irriiy. . B. A site tl1" :h?.linq proposed developmenr of the site, incluCiag. ', toposraphy, building- rolatio,l", ;;;ii;;; rraffic circurarion.. i useable open space, rand,sc"p"a'";;;;;A utiriri.es and drainaoc a- f gatu.res ' s's crtr\4 s4s.rrq Y e . | ..c' Freri'minary-bu-ilding plans and, elevat:-ons sufficient to indicatethe dimensions, gerr5rit "ppearance, scale, and il,terior plan of, , , ,,1,, all buildings. - Any-additionar mat,erial necessary for the review of the applicationas delermined by the zonins-A;;iii"trator. IfI . Time requirements The Planning and Environmental commission meets on the 2nd and 4thMondays of each rnonth- An -application-witn--trr" necessary accompanyingmarerial musr be submi*ed ro-ut ;";k; ;;i;. to the date of themeeting. II . Four (4) copie! of the following ilformation: a \fi%ER-*..s .. ........''- that he was a Planner with the Town of Vaii, who had worked on the annexation process. He further testified that prior to his employment with the Town of Vai1, he was a Planner for the County of Eag1e, Colorado. He testified he was familjar wjth the apea to be annexed, that the area had a community of interest with the Town of Vai1, was urban in nature, and was capable of being integrated jnto the Town ofVail Further, Mr. Pylman stated no parcei of land was being divided by the annexation, nor was a parcel twenty (20) acres or greater included in the area proposed to be annexed. Mr. Pylman testjfied no other annexation proceedjngs by another municipality were underway, and this annexat'i on represented no attachment of land from any school district. Richard Pyiman was the last witness, and Larry Eskw'i th stated he had no others to present to the Council. Mayor Johnston requested corments from the public. Michael Cacioppo, after identjfying himself as a residentof the area proposed to be annexed, requested that he be named as an Election Commissioner, based on a petition he held with signatures of twelve (12) Matterhorn residents. Larry Eskwith explained that the governing body, in this case the Town of Vail, actually petitions the Distri ct Court to order the election to be held and to appoint the Election Commissioners, but that jt was entirely appropriate for Mr- Cacjoppo to request his own appointment as an Electjon Commissioner before Judge Jones'i n District Court. Ensuing discussion took place with the followingparticipants: Kate Krause, Jack Phelps, Ron Phjllips, Larry Eskwjth and Michael Cacioppo. Larry Eskwith then requested that testimony be closed for the public hearing. A motion was made by Dan Corcoran, seconded by Gordon Pierce- The fifth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 15, Series of 1986, a second resolution regarding the proposed annexation of a portion of the area known as West . Vail through an annexation election. The eiection is being ca1 led for ,lulVE-,-t986, ana will be conduETEd-Tn-tfie priV6fe residence of Joe and Charlene Marquez, 1785 Gore Creek Drive, and will reflect the desires of the inhabitants of the area jn l.lest Vail commonly known as Matterhorn. A motion for approval was made by Gail tr.lahrljch-Lowenthal and seconded by Dan Corcoran. The vote was unanimous for approval 4-0. The next item on the agenda was actjon to be taken regardin easement. This was table to a later date. Und Citizen Participation, Loyette Goodell initjated a discussion regarding Lot 40 14*-and 1oca1 participation in cleaning up this open space. Furthery Dave Pelkey, Dan Corcoran, and Ron Phil1ips regarding the ltqtus of thjs_parcel-of-ground-e!-d citizens concerns that it be kept as a park. Mike.--Cacioppii then requested informatlin as to what-srtecifi-c seiviCes the Town iMj ki--Caciofpo ftren requesied jnfoitat]on specjfi-c seiviCes the Town of Vajl would be able to provide for the residents of the area proposed to be annexed and known as Matterhorn. Mayor Johnston indicated the following: Fire and pof iceprotection, bus service, resident rates for passes through the Recreatjon Department, snow removal and maintenance, among others. Under the Town Manager's report, Ron Phjllips stated that Doris Steadman, Youth Services Coordinator for the Library, has been named Employee of the Month for May. Bus ridership on the Town system was down overall 16% from May of'86 compared to a year ago. Addit'i onal 1y, a copy of the Town of Vail Employee Va1 ues was reference by Mr. Phillips. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Respectful 1y submitted, Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyei, fown Cleik Minutes taken by Pamela A. Brandmeyer utilit -t- of Application Nov. 25, 1985 PHONE 476-1818 B. NA}4E OF ADDRESS PHONE 476-2201 NAME 0F 0WNER (print or type)Hong Kong Cafe Pantnership SIGNATURE ADDRESS p. 0- Box 2294, Vail , Cctorado g165Z pHoNE D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION t of theBlock 5-C Vail ViIl I Date APPLICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCI) r- This procedure is required for arteration of an existing buildi-ngwhich adds or_removes any encrosed. floor area or outd.oor patio orreplacement of an existing building sha11 be subject to review bythe Planning and Environm6ntal Corunission. The application will not be accepted until all informatj-on is submitted. A. NAME OF APPLICANT Hong Kong Cafe parlnership APPIICANT'S RNPRESENTATIVE E. F FEE $100. o0 IMPROVEMENT SURVEYOF BUILDING AND ANY PAID {.,K\ - OF PROPERTY SHOWING PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE LAND. LINES AND LOCATION G. A LIST OF THE NAME OF OWNERS OF AI-,L PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THESUBJECT pRopERTy and their mailing addresses. rr' Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the folLowing information: A' The site plan shal1 be d.rawn on a sheet size of 24,, x 36,, at a scaleof r" = 2b'; a variat:.on-or *t" "rt..t-=i""'or scale may be approvedby the Community Oevetopment Department if justified; ADDRESS P. 0. Box 2294, Vail , Colorado 91657 Appricarior ,orQrerior Arrerario,-, o. ModJl ccr pase 2 " .'./*l ' B. The date, North arrow, scale and name of the proposed development shall be shown on the site plan i C.. The existing topographic character of the site including existing and proposed. contours. This condition wj-1l only be requred for expansion area where there is a change of tvro feet of gr:ade; D. The location and size of all existing and proposed builclings' st-ruc- tures and improvements; ' E. The existing and proposed landscaping; F. The location of a1l- elisting and proposed buildings, structures and patios or decks - III. The applicant sha11 submit in wrj-tten and graphic form, a preponderance of evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commissi.on tha.t the proposal is in conformance with the purposes of the CCI District and that the proposal substantially complies with the VaiI Vi-ilage . Urban DesJ-gn Guide Plan. A, If the applicant is proposing a major change.i:r the Vait Village Urban Design Guide PIan, the procedures for change are noted j-n . Section L8.24.220 (B) . IV. The applicant'must also submit written and graphic supporting materials that Lhe proposal substanLially corrplies r"rith the fol-lowing Urban Design Considerations section of the Vail Village Design Consirlera-uian. A. Pedestrianization . B. Vehicle Penetration C. - SLreetscape FrameworkD. Street Enclosure E. Street EdgeF. Building Hej-ghtc. ViewsH. Sun Shade Consideration Many of Lhe above items .should'be addressed. in some graphic means using sucfu tools as sketches, simulations, models (inc]-uding nej-ghboring buildings) , photos, etc V. The Town of Vail Zoning Code for CCI also d.escribes other zoning issues that the appl-icanL must respond to in written or graphic form- VI . Applications for extcrior alteratj.ons or nroclifications in CCI catt' are only reviewed semi-annually. They need to be submitted. beforetbe fourth Monday of May or November. For more specifics on thereview schedule, see Section 18.24.065 A-5. *tPs g t'{tCt --' ! II I If-,,\ 2 \ I l sNowDoN.An-o^xfis ARCHITECTS I ffiTtR @F T'RANSnfl[TrrAL 2Ol Gore Creek Drive vArL, coLoRADO 81657 (303) 476.2201 "^" tl k{/y{ l'"'"o TTENTIONllp R,r-k /lu,.on tr Plans E Samples the following items: tr Specifications tr TO WE ARE SENDING YOU [,,ftacna E Under seDarate cover via tr Shop drawings tr Copy of letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked betow: E For approval D For your use &drequested ! Prints n Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION /tr/s:/rs 1r {7o,ter- k.Hea ( I ,/Allc'-A.toliroA.;" feFnt (r ro) *qAeeKq,//:tirs 5 'r:( ' / /-f ZanS + ?/.elafiorts, I i A/,trr 3ut Ue.' tr Approved as submitted tr Approved as noted E Returned for corrections I Resubmit-copies for approval ! Submit -copies for distribution tr Retu rn -correctred prints E For review and comment n tr FOR BIDS DUE 19- tr PRINTS RETURNED AFTER toAN To US REMARKS SIGNED: Pnoqjcr2aoz /@ t||i, €{tur flB olln lf anclosures ,r9 not ,s notad, hindttt notity r,' at onca. Snowdon and Hopkins 201 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado Architects 303-476-2201 81657 Novenber 25, 1985 l&. Rick fillrnan Town of Vail Planning Department 75 South Frontqge Road Vail , Colorado 81657 Re: Hong Kong Cafe a part of Lot C, Block 5-C, Vail Village First Filing, Vail , Colorado Dear Rick: Ehclosed are four (4 ) sets of jnformation on our proposed request for theredevelopnent to bhe Hong Kong Cafe. Ihe applicanf, Hong Kong CafeParbnership, is requesting exterior modificafions and alterations whichrequires submibt'al of fhe proposed requesb to the Tovn of vail planning Department by Novernber 25, 198j, as per ccr zoning (section 18.29.065)-.This proposal provides for major upgrading of the existlng property. Theredevelognenf, however, wourd require approvar of three items as per the ccrzonlng:1. A conditicmal use permit would be required for incorporabion ofan at grade dinixg pat,io as per Section 18.24.030,2. An approval by the Torrm of Vail for use of Tovnr of Vail propertyfor a portion of the above nentioned dinjng patio.3. A variance request for sit,e coverage (Section 18.24.150) will berequired to try and t,ake advantage of existing patio wa11s andconditions. The redevelopnent of the Hong Kong cafe farls withjn the guidelines of thevail village urban Deslgn Guide Pl-an and ccrnrnercial core i zoning and upgrades portions of the properby which are presently ui:used and isconsistent with the purpose (Section 18.24.010) of CCI. The existing and proposed permitted, aecesqory and conditional uses (Sectj-on 18-24.020 thror;gh 18.24.050) for basement, first floor and second floorLevel are majntained. However, as previously noted, a conditional use ggrmft will be required lo have and operate an outdoor dining patio(Section 18.24.030) at street level_ (Founders plaza). This, however, ishighly encouraged by the Vail Village Urban Design Guide plan. the Iot area and site dimensions (Section 18.24.100), and height (SecLion 18.24.120) conditions and requirements. The 1ot area(1608 square feet existjng), however it isnot impact the proposal. 1 8.24.090); setbacks (Section will be consistent, with existi"ngis below m jr imurn requirenents an existing condltion and should t Ihe Densify Control (Section 18.24.130) is unaffected as the proposal doesnot involve any residential space or GRFA allocations. The coverage (Sectlon 18.24.150) of the property with buildlng, ground 1eve1patios and decks will be unchanged. presently, a majority of the site iscovered with building (755 square feet ) and patios and walkways (745 squarer9e!). we are replaclng amajority of the patio and walkway hard surfaceswith new building, irnproving the appeaances of an unsitely below grade patlo and adding activity to aIl pedestrlan levels. The proposal is notdecreasing whaf landscaping is presently on Lhe sibe and is providing abovegrade planters on the building facades. The proposal , however, woulddisplace scrne landscaping on Toun property (replacing this portion wlLh abgrade patio area), while malntaining a landscape buffer to Founders pLaza. Parlinq and Loading (Section 18.24.180) will be consistent with existingcondit'ions. No on-site parking is provlded and additional parking spacesfor the increase in restaurant and bar space would, as per Tornm of vailstandards, be purchased by the applicant. Loading'requirements would beconsisLent with bhe existing condltions even thor:gh the restaurant/bar areais increased (the same servj_ce colpanies would be supplying thisestablishment along with adjacent propertles ) established loading zones onGore Creek Dnive would sti]l service the restaurant/bar frorn the Wall Streetat-grade access. Elnergency access would be unchanged, using trlal1 Streeb andthe established fire lane directly west of the property. As per the Vail Village Design Ccnsiderations:1. Pedestrianization is rei.nforced by the use of existing walkways,proviAlngi-ffi-elernents ano glirnpses of act ivity pr6 ject ing- atlhe end of established pedestri-an ways. Access to itie propoialat street, tevel (Fourders plaza) happens off the maincirculation path lhrorrgh Founders plaza wlthout interfering withlts norrnal f1ow, while maintaining the existing enclosure or tnePlaza by the cwvilinear sltting wal1. providing access to thebar/restaurant from Fot_rnders plaza also adds an actlviuygenerator and reinforces the pedestrian nature of the plaza, encouragjng its use more Lhan existing condltlons. St{egtsqape Framework 1s reinforced by providing activity, color vehiculaf Penetration is unaffected by this expansion of an@ed use and will use all establishedtraffic and access patterns. and landscEpfig on-Ell levels and faces of the nroposedexpansion. Areas of the property which in the past have beenvery unsightly and a cold visual blank in the streetscape willbe fllled with actlvity t,hrorghout Lhe year. Existing open spaceand landscaping shall contjnue fo give a sofl eOge to tneproperty. ltrowever, with a backdrop of lights, color andactivity of the new proposal , new life and focal points will beadded to the pedesLrian ways. Views info and frorn therestaurantlbar levels will add exciternent, and vitality t,o thepassing pedestrian and draw the passerby up the walkway orthrough the P1aza. The slightly raised djning patio ailows forviews into the adjacent pedestrian ways and takis aOvantage of Nhe magnificant views and sunshine while providing a buffer tothe passerby. 4. Sbreet Ehclostre is improved by providlng an enclosure to the no?'E6EgA;fT-oulders Plaza, raltr"r than an rmoccupied hole. The expansion also provides a stepped down edge frqn the three sbory Lazier Arcade Bullding and developes an enclosure to boththe easf and west walkways by providing a cou:ter to Lhe three story Plaza Lodge (east) and one story Lodge wjng (wesf). This also provides for a desirable enclosure to both walkways by narcowing dowr the pedestrians? view (Lhe canyon effect) and then explodlng the view to the Plaza and the mountain slopes. 6 the Sbreet Eclge is rejnforced by varying the facade, creatlnginterest and activity along the streets, walkways and Plaza. The step back of the southeast conier allows for glimpses of what is beyond without Siving the entire panorama urtil the topof the staircase is achieved. The creation of the patio alcoveoff the maln plaza provides for an activity pocket off the main pedestrian way. The continuation of Plaza materials toward the main entry eary the street edge toward this activity generator. 6. Frj-Iding rbight is eonsistent with bullding faces on opposite edges of the Plaza, providing a gradual step up to adjacentbuildings. the building is rnrel-l- below any height requirements, and due to the smal-l scale of the building, too large a roof would be out of proporNion. Steppirg back the northeast norlhwest corners also soften the bu11dj::rg edge. 7. Views frcm the adjaeenl propertles east and west are unaffected ffiE-Eo larger (3 and 4 sfory) buildings on each side. The views frcm the P1aza norbh are unchanged due to lhe existing envelopeof the building directly north of t,he expansion. Itre views frcmthe south as one approaches Lhe buildlng ane narowed, but only as the stairs are approached. Prior to this point, the Lazier Arcade Bullding is controlling all views. As noted in item 4 the views are reopened as the top of the stair cases are reached, providing Lhe expansive views of bhe mounfajn andslopes. These views will be lmpacfed if future expansi-ons asproposed on other properbies are pursued. Views from the adjacent building (Lazier Arcade Building) will be impacted abthe second 1eve1 by the expansion, however, these corrnercial cotrdomjniums presently have other views to cormter the loss ofthis exposure. The third level residential condcrnjnium unit views will have mjnjmal obstruction, as the majority of thebuilding will occur below the existing solid balcony railjng ofthe uni-t. Service and Dellvery is unchanged and is ccnsistenl with the Toun Plan 6V us@ existlng loadirg and parking zones presently established along Gore Creek Drive. Ehrergency aecess istnaffected and will continue to aecess the property frcm theh/all Street and Lodge side easqnent. 9. ,S-n and ,*rade are Laken jnto consideration by placing theomAoorEEfu area south of the expansion. -srloing will occur on the pedestrian sLalrcase innnediaLely east of the expansion, as it would with any expansicn above Wa1l Sbreet level . This shadlng would occur during the tate afternoon hours. Srading ofadjacent property patios and walkways is mjnimized by the mass and proposal due bo higher (3 and 4 story) buildings directly east and west of the property. Architectural and Landscaping considerations will be addressed during the design review stages of approvals and shall not be expanded upon ab thistjme. I hope the enclosed jnformaLion is adequate to begin the planning process. If you need more jnformaLion or have any questions on the projecf, please let me loow. S'i nn anal rr-'" '- A fryWfur,flrt Craig N. $rovdon, Partner Srowdon and Hopkins - Architects CNS/mp TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ ECT: III. o Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department February 24, .l986 Request for an exterior alteration on a part of Lot C, Block 5-C,vail village First Filing in order to construct a freestanding twostory bui1ding. Appiicant: Hong Kong Cafe partnership I. THE PROPOSAL The applicant, Hong Kong Cafe partnersh.ip, is proposing a tota.lredevelopment.of the existing Hong Kong bire site. ThE existing HongKong cafe is located on two diffeient properties. The din.ing aiea iilocated within the basement of the trr|a'l i Street Building, and the bar areais an addition to that building, yet located on a fee iimple 160g squirefoot parcel of land. The redevelopment proposal entails a 3,000 square foot freestanding, twostory bu il di ng l ocated on the fee s impl e parcel . The bui l di ng wi l T'consist of a sub-grade basement area for storage and accessory uses, akitchen and dining area at the existing bar level with a second story barthat will access at the Founders' Plazi level. The bar area includei anoutdoor dining patio located to the south of the proposed building,adjacent to the Founders' Plaza. This patio will encroach partiaiiy ontoTown of Vai1 property. This encroachment will be handled tirrough a-leasearrangement between the Town of Va.i I and the Hong Kong Cafe. The conmercial core I district is intended to provide sites and tomaintain the unique character of the vail village commercial area, withits mixture of lodges and commercial establishm6nts in a predominantlypedestrian environment rhe ccl district is intended to ensure adequate1ight, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to tire p"rr.i tt"d !yp"l gI buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance w.iththe vail village urban Design Guide plan and Design considerationsprescribe site development standards that are int6nded to ensure themaintenance and preservation of the tighily clustered arrangements of bu'i ldings-fronting on pedestrianways ana puutic greenways, lnd to ensurecontinuation of the bui'lding scale and architectiral quiiit.ies thatdi sti ngu'i sh the vi I I age. This proposal is in compliance with the intent of the zoning for theCommercial Core I zone distr.i ct. II. There are no sub-area concepts wh.i ch redevel opment proposal . relate directly to this DES IGN VI LLAGE IV. from qOMPLIANCE l,lITH THE OES IGN IDERATIONS FOR VI LLAGE The purposes of Cons i derati ons the comparisonis to show how between the new the proposal and the design strengthens or detracts the overall intent of the Design Considerations. A. Pedestrianization Applicant; Pedestri anization is reinforced by the use of existing walkways, providing design elements and 91 impses of activity projecting at the end of established pedestrian ways. Access to the proposal at street level (Founders Plaza) happens off the main circulation path through Founders Plaza without interfering withits normal f1 ow, while maintaining the existing enclosure of the Plaza by the curvilinear sitting wa11. Providing access to the bar/restaurant from Founders Plaza also adds an activity generator and reinforces the pedestrian nature of the P1aza, encouraging its use more than existing conditions. Staff: This proposal is located adjacent to two major pedestrian areas; lJall Street, which 'is a main pedestrian walkway, and Founders' P1aza, which js a major pedestrian plaza area. The staff feels that the proposal reinforces the pedestrian experience in both of these areas. The fenestratjon of the building will allow the pedestrian on l'lall Street the ability to view the activity generated by the interior dining and bar areas. The exterior deck accessed from Founders' Plaza will generate further activity thatwill comolement both the Plaza area and Vendetta's patio. B. Vehi c'le Penetrat ion Appljcant: Vehicle penetration is unaffected by this expansion of an existing and established use and will use al I established traffic and access patterns. Staff: This proposal presents no further impact upon vehicle penetration within the Vi lIage. All loading and deliveri es wjll take place from established loading zones. As the use is substantialIy the same as is existing, tri p generation is not expected to increase. C. Streetscape Framework Applicant: Streetscape framework is reinforced by providing ictivity, color and Iandscaping on a'l I Ievels and faces of the proposed expansion- Areas of the property which jn the past have been very unsightly and a cold visual blank in the streetscape will be filled with activity throughout the year. Existing open space and landscaping shalI continue to g'ive a soft edge to the property. However, with a backdrop of lights, color and activity of the new proposal , new ljfe and focal points will be added to the pedestrian ways. Views into and from the restaurant/bar levels will add excitement and vitality to the passing pedestrian and draw the passerby up the walkway or through the Plaza. The sl ightly raised dining patio allows for views into the adjacent pedestrian ways and takes advantage of the magnificent views and sunshine while providing a buffer to the passerby. Staff: The criteria related to streetscape framework states that D. new construction should "improve the quality of the wa1 king expefli ence and give continuity to the pedestrian ways, as a continuous system, two general types of improvements to the adjacent wa1 kways are cons'idered: l) open space and landscaping 2)'i nfill commercial store fronts, expansion of existing buildings." This proposal attempts to meet this cri teria by maintaining the existing planter box on the lower west side of the ltlall Street staircase with the second level of the bujlding cantileveredpartjally over the planter in order to bring the activity and vital ity of the bar area closer to the pedestrian way. The staff also agrees with the applicant that the infill of the existing oatio contributes to the streetscaoe framework from both l.lall Street and Founders Plaza, and that the proposed building designwill contribute more to the streetscape than the existing addition. Street Enclosure Applicant: Street Enclosure 'i s improved by providing an enclosure to the north edge of Founders P1aza, rather than an unoccupiedhole. The expansion also provides a stepped down edge from the three story Lazier Arcade Building and develops an enclosure to both the east and west walkways by provid'i ng a counter to the three story Plaza Lodge (east) and one story Lodge wing (west). This also provides for a desirable enclosure to both walkways by narrowing down the pedestrians' view (the canyon effect) and then exploding the view to the Plaza and the mountain slopes. Staff: Street enclosure is being altered by the infill of the existing patio area as well as by the addition of a second level . From the pedestrian experience on h'|all Street, we feel that the proposal accentuates the "canyon effect." h|e feel , however, that as a short connecting fink, this is an area where that effect is acceptable. ll|e also fee'l that the proposed patio improves the street enclosure area from the plaza area. The existing area consists of a deep landscaped pocket and a recessed patio. The raised patjo and landscape barrierinvolved in this proposal add both definition and activ'ity to the Founders Plaza. Street enclosure from the Lodge walkway is also strengthened by the removal of the existing greenhouse addition and infill of the existing patio. The proposed bujlding wi11 provide a stronger street enclosure from this pedestrian access into Founders Plaza. E. Street Edge Applicant: The street edge is reinforced by varying the facade, creat'i ng interest and activity along the streets, walkways andplaza. The step back of the southeast corner allows for glimpses of what is beyond without giving the entire panorama untiI the top of the staircase is ach'ieved. The creation of the patio aicove off the main plaza provides for an activity pocket off the main pedestrian way. The continuation of plaza materials towand the main entry carry the street edge toward this activjty generator. Staff: The proposed building's facade, landscape treatments, and exteri or patio will imnrove and reinforce the street edqe on both Wal I Street and the Founders Pl aza. The uti I i zati on of simi I ar materials continujng from the walkway and plaza into the proposed 3 F. patio and building reinforce street edge while maintaining adistinct architectura'l vernacular. Building Heisht Applicant: The building height is consistent with building faces on opposite edges of the Plaza, providing a gradual step up to adjacent buildings. The building is well below any hejght requirements, and due to the small scale of the building, too large a roof mass would be out of proportion. Stepping back the northeast and northwest corners also soften the building edge. Staff: The height of the proposed two story building ranges fromffi za feet. This vari ation is due to thi grade changei around and along the structure. These hejghts are well within ljmits al]owed in Commercial Core I. G. Views and Focal Points Applicant: Views from the adjacent properties east and west are unaffected due to larger (3 and 4 story) buildings on each si de. The views from the Plaza north are unchanged due to the existing envelope of the building directly north of the expansion. The views from the south as one approaches the building are narrowed, but only as the stairs are approached. Prior to this point, the Lazier Arcade Building 'i s control 1ing all views. As noted in item D, the views are reopened as the top of the stair cases are reached, providing the expansive views of the mountain and slopes. These views will be'impacted if future expansions as proposed on other properties are pursued. Views from the adjacent building (Lazier Arcade Building) will be impacted at the second level by the expansion. However, these commercial condominiums presently have other v'i ews to counter the loss of this exposure. The third level residential condominium unit views will have minimal obstruction, as the majority of the building will occur below the existing solid balcony rai'l 'ing of the unit. Staff: Views are affected for a pedestrian moving south on either lllall Street or the Lodge wa1 kway, as well as from the second and third floors of the hlall Street Building. Views south from hlall Street are currently 'l imited by the lllall Street Building. The additjon of a two story Hong Kong Cafe will further limit those vjews, with the plaza and mountain views not appearing until one reaches the top of the }'|all Street staircase, adjacent to the Hong Kong Cafe. The proposal produces a similar impact to the southeast oriented view as one moves south on the Lodge wa1 kway. The view from the second floor condominium of the Lazier building 'i s seriously impacted by the adjacent wall of the proposed Hong Kong Cafe- This condominium is a commercjal office space, which somewhat offsets this impact. A view analysis from the third floor residential condominium has. been submitted with th'i s proposa'l . Thjs analysis shows little impact resultjng from the proposal , as the control points appear to be a balcony railing and the peak of the One Vail Place Building. Overal1, we feel the architect has attempted to mitigate thlse viewproblems through building hejght and design control. H. Servjce and Delivery Applicant: Servjce and delivery is unchanged and is consistentwith the Town Plan by usihg existing loading and parking zonespresently established along Gore creek Drive. Emergency access isunaffected and will continue to access the property-from the l,lallStreet and Lodge side easement. Staff: The current utilization of this area is as abar,/restaurant. This proposal will not alter or impact currentservice and del ivery to th.i s property. Del.iveries will useexisting approved Ioading and parking zones. Emergency access isnot affected or further impacted by thjs development. - I.Sun/Shade fPpl icant: Sun.and shade are taken into consjderation by piac.i ngthe outdoor patio area south of the expansion. Shad.i ng wiil 0..u.on the pedestrian staircase immediately east of the exiansion, asit would with any expansion above wall Street level. ihis shadingwould occur duri ng the late afternoon hours. shading of adjacentproperty patios and walkways is m.inimized by the proposal due tohigher (3 and 4 story) bu.ildings directly eist and west of theproperty. Staff:. The addition of a two story element on this parcel hassignificant shading impact upon th! l'lall Street area in the lateafternoon hours. The March/September 4:00 pm d.i agram detajls aminor shade encroachment upon Vendetta's patio, ind a completeshading of the Wall Street staircase. In.analyzing this diagram, it appears that lowering the buildingheight by I to 2 feet or removing the eastern parafet walr wourdeliminate the shading of vendetti's patio. There would still beconsiderable shading upon the wall street stairs, but as a shorttransition area, we feel that thjs is acceptable. The impact to the Lodge walkway w.i ll occur .i n the early morninghours. _ The March/September 9:00 am analysis shows an ida.i t.ional qofeet of shading, thus lengthening the sniaing caused by the wallStreet 8ui1ding. Any development of this parcel will create sun/shade .impacts tothis area and we feel that the proposed builaihg desig;'ii--sensi tive to thi s issue. V.ZONING CONSIDERATIONS Project Statistics Lot Size: 1608 sq ft Site Coverage: 90% - This is over the allowable maximum of 80% site coverage within Commercial Core I but is not a change from the existing site coverage. Staff feels that due to the existing situation, no variance is necessary. Bui1ding Square Footage:Approximately 3,080 sq ft Parking: Parking requirement will be determined at building permit. Parking fees will be assessed and paid into the parking fund. VI.STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recornmends approval . Although this proposal presents jmpacts upon the view and sun/shade criteria of the guidelines, we recognize that any redevelopment of this site will create sone impacts. ll|e feel the designof the bu'i lding reflects a serious attempt at meeting the design guideline criteri a and minirnjzing impacts. We feel that the bar and patio located at the Founders Plaza level will add positively to the activity of the Plaza and that the infil'l contributes to the pedestri an experience on Wall Street. The Community Development Department staff would respectfully request the following conditions be p1 aced on this project, should it be approved: l. That the applicant not remonstratedistrict if and when it should be against any special improvement formed for Vail Village. on the approval of this proposal2. That a three year limit be placed 3. That a lease agreement be formalized with the Town of Vail for use of the patio area located on Town of Vail property. Thjs lease agreement may reflect any increased snow removal costs incurred by the Town of Vail. t ,I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ ECT: Planning and Environmental Commissjon Community Development Department February 24, ,l986 A request for a conditjonal use permit in order to construct anoutdoor patio in conjunction with the redevelopment of a part of !o! C, Block 5-C, Vail Vi llage First Filing. Applicant: Hong KongCafe Partnershi o I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE Section 18.24.030 of the zoning code of the Town of VaiI lists outdoorpatios as a conditional use in the commercial core I district. Theredevelopment proposai for the Hong Kong cafe, as discussed in anaccompanying memo, involves creatjon of an outdoor pat'i o at the FoundersPlaza level , iust south of the proposed building. the pat.io is locatedpartially on Town of vail land. The vail rown council i.ras grantedpermission to the applicant to include this encroachment onto Townproperty in thejr exterjor alteration proposal . The patio js approximately 500 square feet, with about half of that area located on Town of Vail property. II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 18.60, the Communjty Development Department recommendsapproval of the conditional use permit based upon ine roilowing factors: II.RelationshiD and imDact of the use on devtrwn. - ilr.O"n Design Considerat.ions, as an.integrai part of the VailVillage Urban Design Gujde plan, are a reflect.i oh of thedevelopment objectives of the comrnunity for the commercial core Iarea-. These Design Considerations state as the.i r intent ,,to guidegrowth and change in ways that will enhance and preserve theessential qualities of vail village." The following statements areexcerpts from the section of the Design considerations that pertainto decks and patios: 'Dining decks and patios, when properlydesigned and sited, bring people to the streets, opportunities tolook at and be looked at, and genera'l 1y contribute to theliveliness o! a lqsV street--miking it a rjcher pedestrian experience than if those streets were empty.,' Given these statements from the Design considerations, we feel thatthis proposal does indeed meet the divelopment objectives of the Town. A , 2' " ig- r.c/ transportation facilities. utilities. schools. parks and recreation \J \ !c/ t,ran spo rtat'l on faci litles, utl litres. schools, parKs and recreaElon.Y- .#-)' facilities, and other public facilities needs. r \\''Xrt' .py'lie proposed outdoor patio has no effect on any of the above L> L/ -monfinnod cni*or ir ovcant fnr narhane dictrihrlfion of nonttlaI^/-mentioned criteria except for perhaps distribution of population. ftr'' The proposed outdoor patio will create an act'ivity pocket adjacer \ tq.but removed-from the Founders Plaza area. _Staff feels that tfan act'ivity pocket adjacent area. Staff feels that the addition of this patio will add positive reinforcement to the activity of the Founders Plaza area. ?Effect u on traffic with rticular reference to t ion ve and Dedestr 1 an safetv an conven 1 ence tr ow and con f,ro access . maneuvera remova I o street an parKl ng areas , |,'Ihile the proposed patio is adjacent to a naior pedestri an way within Va'i I Vil1age, the location and design is such that we feel that there will be no negative impacts to pedestrian safety or convenience, traffic flow or control or access. The creation of this outdoor patio will impact snow removal from the Founders Plaza area. The Public Works Department is currently quantifying thatjmpact. If this outdoor patio is approved, the lease arrangement with the Town of VaiI wil'l reflect any increased costs to the Town caused by snow removal inpacts. 4. Effect the character of in which the e ls ocated nc luql n the sca ulk o on to surroundi n uses. The Community Development Department staff feels that this proposed use will have a positive effect upon the character of the area as an activity generator adiacent to the Founders Plaza. The use is compatible with the surrounding retail and restaurant/bar uses and we feel will complement the ex'i sting Vendetta's patio area. B. Such other factors and critelia as the Commils!on deems applicable to the In considering an app'l ication for a conditional use permit within Commercial Core I District, the following development factors shall be appl i cabl e: A.-- Effects of vehicuiar traffic on Commercial Core I distri ct. This proposal presents no impact to this criteria. Reduction of vehicular traffic in Commercial Core I district' This proposal presents no impact to this criteria. Reduction of nonessent'i al off-street parking. This proposal presents no impact to this criteri a. R nU, 1.- E.(< F Control of delivery, pickup, and servjce vehicles. This proposal presents no .impact to th.is crjterja. Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians. The-proposed patio will serve as an activ.i ty pocketpublic places. The staff feels that the paiio w.illimpact on the vitality of the plaza area. Continuance of the varjous commercial , resdiential ,in Cornmercial Core I district so as to maintain thecharacter of the area. This-proposal is harmonious with the deve'l opment objectives of ccIand is compatible with the adjacent uses. Control quality of construction, architectural des.i gn, andlandscape design in commercial core I district so ai io miintainthe existing character of the area. The proposed patio is an erement of an exterion arterationsubmittal and will be reviewed relative to the UrUan OesilnGuidel ines for CCI. adjacent to the have a positive and public uses exi sti ng c. 7flrll. There are no related policies .i n thjs proposal . IV. FINDINGS The Community Development Department recommends that the conditional usepermit be approved based on the following findings: That the proposed location of thethis ordinance and the purposes of I ocated. use js in accord wjth the purposes the distri ct in which the site is and the conditions under which itnot be detrimental to the publicly injurious to propert.ies or of That the proposed location of the usewould be operated or maintained wouldhealth, safety or welfare or material improvements jn the vic.i nity. That the proposed use would comply with eachof this ordinance. The environmental impact report concerni4g the proposed use. if an Not appl i cabl e. of the appl icable provis.i ons a V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As this proposal is submitted in conjunction with the redevelopment plans for the Hong Kong Cafe, the Community Development Department recommends approval . Community Development staff feels that the proposed outdoorpatio is a positive element of the redevelopment proposal and that itwill contribute to the pedestrian experience and activity of the area. A. _rC'. PRESENT Ei-BTiner Diana Donovan Bryan Hobbs Pam Hopkins Duane Piper Si d Schul tz Jim Viele P LANN I NG order by the and March 10 AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION February 24, .|986 STAFF PRESENT FaGF-Fatien Tom Braun Kristan Pri tz Rick Pylman Betsy Rosolack tne the meeting was called to meetings of January 27 chairman, Duane were approved Piper. The minutes of with corrections. 1.uest for exterior alter on of the Hon Kon ^-s\,al I in order toconstruct a storv bui anq a con n oroer t0ave an o Rick Pylman explained the request-opment proposalincluded a 3,000 square foot freest'inding,two story building. He reviewecl the Va Urban Design Consjderations and said that the staff recommended approval. Craigsnowdon, architect for the project, showed f1 oor p1ans, s.ite plans'andeievations. He said that the inow removal from the patio wouid take place toward the west, not toward Founders plaza. -Snowdon then told the commissioners that he had been meeting with the owner ofunit 309 in the Laz'i er Arcade, Mr. Bleckner, and made some ilterat.i ons in thedes'ign that had been presented to staff. His firm found that they could lowerthe peak 30" in order to get the peak below Mn. Bleckner's deck riiling anO alsocould drop the perimeter .lg,,. Thjs wou)d improve the sunlshade w.i th the resultthat there would be no shade on Vendetta's deck and no shade on the stairs untilthe late afternoon. Snowdon stated that he found that the restaurant would not have the use of theal ley north of the building nor would they have access to the trash dumpster ofthe Lazier building. Th'i s would eliminate the door that had been proposed toaccess the staircase. He proposed to solve the problem by locat.ing the door onthe southeast corner and putting trash containers in a covered area near theplanters on the east side of the building, with daily pick up. He proposed alsoto keep the access to the alleyway open for the LazjLr building and build a wallto match the Hong Kong exterior with a gate to cover the al 1ey. James Fallin, representing Mr. Bleckner, sated that his client did haveobjections to the design as it was originally proposed, but that the changeswere amendable to Mr. Bleckner. He wished tir makb the changes a part of theconditjonal use request as follows-: 1. The top of the skyl'i ght would be no higher than 6', below the railing ofthe deck of unit #309. (The rai1ing.i i z5', above wa1 1 Street-) 2. The top of the major roof line no more than 6" above floor'l evel of Un.i t309. 3' The top of the spokes in the skylight no more than 18,'above floor levelof Unit 309. or on Lot C. Block onq cate Partners i_ The exhaust hood fans will be located on the southwest corner and screened from view of unit 309. A1 I skylights shalI be bronze tint and inoperable. No exit shall be located on the north side of the building on the Znd fIoor. 7. All mechanical equipment placed on the roof shall be hidden from v'i ew from Unit 309. 8. Skylights on the north half of the building shall be shaded at night and shall be made of dark material . 9. No direct up light shal1 be used on the second floor. 10. The fireplace flue on the top shall be no wider than .l8" Brian 0'Rei11y spoke for the applicant and l'i sted some agreements the applicant had with Robert Lazier. Bob Lazjer stated that the applicant came to him and showed hin the proposed building. He had not known the trash plan before that time, and felt that the proposed solution of the Hong Kong using the Lazier Arcade Building's trash dumpster was unacceptable. He a.l so did not want an access between the two buildings because he wanted this to be a buffer and for flexibi I ity for future construction. Steve Simonett, manager of One Vail Place, said that the Owners of One Vail Place were concerned about the construction to be taking place at the Hong Kong and at the Plaza Building. Their intention was to redo the paver bricks on their property in the spring and d'id not want to allow access for construction trucks or vehicles in the area between One VaiI P'l ace and VaiI Ski Rentals- Snowdon said that he did not foresee using this access, but would access from the al 1ey or from lllall Street. Bryan Hobbs liked the buiIding, but was concerned about the a1 leyway and what would be constructed in front of it. Snowdon replied that at present there was a blank wall. The alley would be torn up duri ng construction, and afterward a wall could be constructed to match the building material of the Hong Kong and that it would be at least 6 feet high and would tie into the Lazier Arcade- Hobbs asked wondered if the Town had any problem with a lease agreenent with the Hong Kong and Snowdon replied that the Council had heard the request in early 5. 6. .b.. January. Patten added that requests in both villages are common for this typeof use, and that the Town would allow encroachment onto Town property for Ainingdecks, but not for structures. It was usually done in a lease. Tom Eriner had no problem with the a11ey, but was concerned about the locatjonof the trash. He suggested using a compactor or perhaps putting the trash onthe west side. Snowdon stated that he had the access problem and the need to work with theexist'ing patio wall. He felt that he could design something to entirely hidethe trash. viele liked the proposal and shared Brjner's concern about thelocation of the trash. He asked about the drainage of the building and Snowdonreplied that the building would be drained to the insjde and so thi snow nroblemon the roof would be self-contained. viele asked about a parking study, andPylman replied that he was planning to wait until he had rece.i vei wort<ingdrawings before trying to figure out the amount of parking fee requ.i red. Donovan agreed with v'iele and also suggested that any agreements between twoadjacent property owners was outside of the commissioners, jurisd.i ctjon. shealso stressed that the wall must look permanent. snowdon replied that thiscould be handled by the DRB. Donovan was also concerned about the locatjon oftrash, and would have liked to have seen it placed on the west side. she alsowould have liked the length of approval shortened to two years rather thanthree. sid schultz's concerns were with the a1 leyway and the location of the trash. Duane Piper agreed and stated that since the-locatjon of the trash was jn effectan llth hour decision, he would like to see further study before making adecision. Tom Briner asked if the drawings presented to the board refTected thechanges made in response to the neighbor,-and snowdon replied that they didnot. Bob Lazier stated that currently all trash from the Hong Kong came out of theeast side without a compactor. He felt that the few aAAitionat people who wouldbe served with the new building would not result in much more trash. Heexpressed the desire to have the project start as soon as possible. Dave Irish, one of the owners, felt that the trash dilemma could be worked out,but if there were a delay, there would be a late start on construction. Hesuggested two a'l ternatjves: l, screen the trash on the east side, or 2, put thetrash on the west side. Snowdon asked Irish if he could agree to access from the west side.i n order toput the trash on the west side. Irish replied he could, but needed to hear fromLazier. more di scussi on, meeting on March applicant requested to request unti 1 thefho 'tn tabl e the secondedrch 10. The v te n favor w one abstenti on After next unti I Donovan moved and Viele to lable the request tree Hote z.A request to rezone Lot 2, Block l, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filinq from Hiqh Density Multiple Family to Special Development District in order to veloo an add'i tional 92 Iodqe rooms niuma. and approximatel uare feet of meetinq/conference ce as Phase II of the ted Partners Tom Braun showed site plans and elevations and explained the reguest. He said that the PEC action that day would be advisory on1y, and the final decision would be made by the Council on March 4. Braun described the zoning analysis of the Doubletree. The end result of the request would be a density of twice that allowed by the underlying zoning and a parking shortage of 50 spaces. He reminded the board that this was a request for a special development districl and that SDD's had been proposed in Vail to allow for the development of s'i tes that would be unable to do so under conventional zoning. Braun explained the criteria to be considered as stated in the memo which included design issues, pedestrian traffic, open space and 'landscaping. He also revjewed the zoning considerations using the underlying, HDMF zoning. Braun felt that it was unfortunate that the Doubletree Inn was not located within the Vail Village study area, and that a Town-wide land use plan was only in its early stages of deve'l opment and not near completion. This would have provided the staff with a better understanding of the implications that this project may have on other development potentials in the Valley. He added that the concern of the staff was how th'i s request related to Town-wide development issues. For example, what would a cumulative impact have on the Frontage Road if s'imilar requests for additional density increases were to be allowed in this area? Braun showed the setback encroachments on a sjte p1an, and discussed height' site coverage, landscaping and parking. He explained the method used to determine the amount of parking necessary for the site. Even with a 5% multi-use reduction and a 50% reduction for the required parking for the meeting room space, the result was a deficit of 50 parking spaces. The staff recommendation was for denial because of the shortage of parking and because of the amount of increased density requested. Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, introduced several employees of the Doubletree Hotel. Jeff 0lson and Anthony Pellechia, architects on the project, showed s'i te plans and answered questions. Peterson stated that both the staff and Jeff Winston had expressed no problem with the design of the project. He added that the basic parking ratio had been retained with the addition. He also said that at present the Altitude Club was the place for locals to go and there was no control of parking. He felt that underground parking would not invite the casua'l user of the bar or restaurant to use it. Peterson stated that his studies showed that 75% of hotel patrons arrive by automobile and of those 75%, 75% keep their auto with them during their stay, resulting in 55% of hotel guests keeping their autos. He felt that the existing proiect worked with its parking even though much of the parking was uncovered. Peterson went on to quote the parking study that had been done in the Vi11age. He said that it stated that there was a 20-70% vacancy rate jn private parking lots. He added that Doubletree guests could use the Lionshead parking structure if there were no parking spaces left on site. Peterson also said that the Marriott had 25% fewer parking spaces and no parking problem except in summer. ?t for an ex or alteration o Kon Cafe in orconstruct a two stor buildinq. a ermi tave an age Viele moved and Hobbs seconded to approve the uested exterio Iteration andtiouse w the conditions per the staff nrerno.ndi ti ons were; Rick Pylman rem'i nded the board that they had first heard the proposal onFebruary 24th at which time 3 significant issues had been raised which were: 1- The aesthetic treatment of the a1 1ey way that will be created betweenthe Hong Kong bu il di ng and the Lazj er l,lal l Street Bui ldi ng. 2. Location of trash facjlities for the Hong Kong cafe. 3- concern over enforcement of conditions requested by the owner of thethird floor condominium.i n the Lazjer Wall Street 6ui1ding. Pylman stated that the applicant had submjtted drawings that jndicate a eightfoot high fence with gate to be constructed between t6e two build.i ngs and touldbe made of the same siding material as the proposed Hong Kong cafe. He then explained that the applicant was now proposing to install a trashcompactor and trash storage room in the basement levei of the proposed HongKong cafe building. If it was bu'i lt to proper standards had been'reviewed andapproved by the Environmental Health departnent and trash would be removed onan every other day basis. Pylman also stated that attorneys for the owner of the third floor condominiumand for the Lazier hlal'l Street building had drawn up a contractual agreementdetailing conditions and the contract had been reviewed by the Town Ittorney. Craig- Snowdon, architect on the project explained that after conversatjons withGary_Murrain, ch'i ef Building Officjal , more exits and stairways were added. Inmodifying the jnterior, the elevation was changed which resulied.i n 30,,rore ot"less being subtracted from the hejqht. 'I That the applicant not remonstrate against but will participate in anyspecial improvement district if and when one if formed for Vail villiie. That a three year limit be placed on the approva] of this proposai. That a lease agreement be formalized with the Town of vail for use ofthe patio area located on Town of vail property. This lease agreemen!may_reflect any increased snow removal tosls iicurred by the Town ofVail. 2. ,( The VO was 4 in favor and I aqainst the a vot because s was not novan voted aqainst therova I . a;a]Tonto0wnof Va opertv. n favor of the ona I use permit en c roacn 1 n 4-Are uest to amend the develo I an of Crossroads and for ack ances n order to enc tose an ex sti n ninq deck a at cant:uest Pylman stated that this request was original ly heard on 0ctober 24, 1985 and had been tabled severaj times since that time. The request is to enclose 454 square feet of an existing exterior dining area on the south side of the building adjacent to East Meadow Dri ve. He added that there was no real development plan because the building had been constructed prior to being zoned Commercial Service Center, and the staff required the existing s'i te plan be submitted as part of the application jn an attempt to update the developmentplan. In the original request, the applicant replaced the enclosed outdoor dinj ng with other outdoor dining and the staff supported the request using the Urban Design Gu'i de Plan as criteria. Now the outdoor dining was not being replaced and the staff recommended denial of the amendment to the development p1an. Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, stated that the applicant felt that the retaining wall would have been too high in the original appiication. He also pointed out that if the wall were to be moved, one tree would be lost. He said that the appljcant planned to place benches above the wall where diners could sjt if they wished to be outside. Peterson pointed out that Crossroads was not in Commercial Core I and should not be judged with CCI Guidelines. He stated that most of the pedestrian traffic was across the street, that many semi-trucks drove through the area, and that the Commercial Serv'i ce Center was 'intended to be a service center w'i th lots of vehicle access. The code stated that al1 activity must be located inside. Peterson said that the deck was located in a hole, and was not used much. Pylman pointed out that the Haagen Daz deck was encouraged and that the use of the Urban Design Guide Plan was used for the Haagen Daz deck and that the guidelines were used for other propertjes which were not in CCI or CCIi, but were adjacent to it. Patten added that the Guide Plan was intended to encompass this area as well. Viele felt that it was unfortunate that the applicant could not do the deck' He added that there vvas some inconsistency in evalua'uing the proposai uriaer rhe Urban Design Guide Plan without Commercial Core I zonjng. He was not sure if it was good to plan an outdoor deck when the zoning did not call for outdoor decks. Donovan read the zoning and stated that it sa'i d one could st'i ll do outdoor decks. Peterson replied that authorjzation was needed to have outdoor activity. He felt that the Haagen Oaz deck was not used much. Donovan stated that one could also argue convincingly that this use could be grandfathered. Larry Eskwith, town attorney, stated that nothing in the Commercial Service Center zone description says that one cannot have decks. Peterson replied that the zone code spoke of permitted uses and then conditional uses are listed with the addition of "any use permitted which is not conducted entirely within a bui1ding." Piper stated that the staff encouraged the Haggen Daz deck and Kristan Pritz added that this deck was for the use of all of Crossroads. Donovan pointed out that the whole area had slowly changed to that of a pedestpi an area, with nearly as many pedestnians as on Bridge Street. Schultz asked if the exterior dining was being enclosed because some of the interior dining had been lost and Snowdon and Hopkins o Architects 201 Gore Creek Drive 30g-476-2201 Vail, Colorado 91657 February 12, 1986 Mr. Rick fuIman Tovnr of Vail Planning Department 75 South Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81657 Re: Hong Kong Cafe Suhnlttal for February ZU, 1986 pEC Meeting Dear Rick, Ehelosed is the addi.tional information you requested in your February p, 1986 letter for the Hong Kong cafe Redevelognent. r hopb the irformat,ionprovides you with the data you need to complete your review. The enclosed new drawings help Lo demonstrate graphically (1) view impact,and (2) sur/shade considerations r,ulrich you were concerned about. Alsoirc{gded 1s a copy of the title report (Schedule B) and a signedconditional use permlt form for an at grade patio and use of towr property 1n eonju'rction with the restaurantrs outdoor patio. -rn response fo your inquiry conce.ning the new staircase between the HongKong cafe and the Lazier Arcade (wa1l street ) Building and as per ourtelephone conversatj.on last week, we are proposing (ii conjr.ncblon with Mr.LazLer) a stairease to service Lhe second 1evel oi ootrr uuildiags. Thisstairease has been requested by Mr. Laz ier to access several cqnrnercialcondorniniums on the second level of the eastern and southern portlons of hisbui-j-ding. The Hong Korg cafe o!,iners are more than willing to work with Mr.Lazier to acccrnplish his goa1s, however, a final solution has not beenagreed to. The stair shor,in on the drawing was established to give anindication to the ohners (and to the tor.nJ what could be done ano what trreconstrailts were if the stair was wrdertaken. This staircase, T wouldhoper should not be an elsnent Lo hold up the review of bhis subnittal_.Mr- Lazier w111 need to bring this proposal along wiLh his other designideas before the PEC as a separate proposal. Tha Hong Kong cafe wouldhowever consider accessing the staircase r"rhen and if it was construcled. A1so, enclosed is an @cupancy calculation (existing and proposed ) which may help you evaluate the parklrg requirenents for the expansion of the building. I hope this informabion answers your questlons, and if you should need more information or have any questions concerning this subnitbal, please feelfree to cal] me. Sincerely, /twftuwud*r Cralg N. Srowdon, Partner 9rordcn and Hopkins, Architects CNS/mp ce: Mr. Dave lrish Etclosures Snowdon and Hopkins 201 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado Architects 303-476-2201 81657 January 27, 1986 1.4r. Rick Pylman Tol'in of Vail Planning Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail , Colorado 81 652 Re: Hong Kong Cafe a part of Lot C, Block FC, Vail Village First Filjng, Vail , Colorado Dear Rick: Erclosed are four (4) set,s of inforrnation on our proposed request for the redevelopment to the Hong Kong Cafe. Ihe applicant, Hong Kong CafeParLnershipl is requesting exterior modifications and alterations whichrequires subrniftal of the proposed request to the Tornnr of vail planning Department for revj-ew by the PEC. This proposal provides for majorupgrading of the existing properLy. The redevelopnent, however, wouldrequlre approval of fhree j.ttrns as per the CCf zoning:1. A conditional use permit would be required for incorporation ofan at grade dining patio as per Section 18.24.030.2. nn approval by the Tor^ar of Vail for use of Town of Vail propertyfor a portion of the above menticrned dining patio.3. A variance request for slte coverage (Section 18.24.150) will berequlred to try and take advantage of existing patio walls andcondllions. The redevelognent of the Hong Kong cafe falls within the guidelines of thevail village urban Design Guide plan and ccmmercial core i zcning andupgrades portions of ihe property which are presently unused and isconslsient with the purpose (Section 18.24.01 0) of CCI. Tle existing and proposed permitted, accessory and conditional uses (Section 18.24.020 thror:gh 18.24.050) for basement, first floor and second floorIevel are maintained. However, as previ.ously noted, a conditional usegg"ti! wif] b9 requlred to have and operale an outdoor dining patio(Secticn 18.24.030) at street level (Fot.nders plaza). This, however, ishighly encouraged by the Vail Village LJrban Design Guide plan. The lot area and site dimensions (Seciton 18.24.100), and he\ght (Section 18.24.120)condltions and requirenents. The lot area(1608 square feet existltg), however it isnot jmpact lhe proposal. 18.24.090); setbacks (Seetion will be consistent with existingis below minimul requirernents an existine condltion and should 2 The Density Control (Sectitrr 18.24.130) 1s unaffected as lhe proposal doesnol irrvolve any residential space or GRFA allocations. The coverage (Section 18.24.150) of the property wi.th buildlng, grourd 1eve1patios and decks will be urchanged. presenbly, a majority of-the site 1s covered with buildjng ftjj sqllare feet) and patios and walkways (245 squarefget). trle are replacing amajority of the patio and walkway hard surfaceswith new building, improving the appeaances of an ursitely below grade patlo and adding activity to all pedestrian Ievels. The proposal is notdecreasing what landscaping 1s presently on the site and is providing abovegrade planters on the buildilg facades. The proposal , however, woul-displace scme landseaping on Toran property (replacjng this porticn with atgrade pabio area), while maintaining a landscape bufier to Fourders praza. Par\ing and Loading (section 18.24.180) will be consistent with existingconditions. No on-site parklng is provided and additional parking spaoEsfor the increase in restaurant and bar space would, as per iown of vailstandards, be purchased by the appllcant. Loading'requirements would beconsistent with the existing conditions even thotigh the restaurant/bar areais jncreased (the sarne service ccrnpanies would be supplying thisestabl-ishmert along wlth adjacent properties). sstablibired loading ztrles cnGore Creek Drive woul"d sti1l service the restaurant /bar frcrn the Will Streetat-grade access. Einergency aecess would be r..nchanged, using l'laLl street andthe established fire lane directly west of the property. - As per the Vail Village Deslgn Ccnsiderations:1- Pedestrianization is reinforced by the use of existing walkways,pro\ffimg ?ese-elements and glimpses of activity pr63ecting atthe end of established pedestrian ways. Access to Lne proposalat street level (Fouriders plaza) happens off the maincirculation path thror-rgh Fourders plaza without inferfering withits normal flow, while maintainlng the existing encrosure of thePlaza by the curvirinear sitting warl . providlng access to thebar/restaurant from Fourders plaza also adds an ictivitygenerator and reinforces the pedestrian nature of the pLaza, encouragixg its use more than existing conditions, 2. Vehlculal. Penefratio{r is r.maffected by this expansion of an@ed use ano wirr use arl estabrishedtraffie and access pabterns. Stlegtsqape gramework is reinforced by providlng activify, colorand landscEplng-on-Ell levels and faces- of the proposed expanslon. Areas of the property whieh in the pasi have beenvery u:sightly and a cold visual blank jn the streetscape willbe fllled wi-th aetivity thror_ghout the year. Existing open "pr..and l-andscaping sha1l contj.nue to give a soft eOge to tLeproperty. However, with a backdrop of ljghts, color andaetivily of Lhe new proposal , new life and focal polnts will beadded to the pedeslrian ways. Views into and frcm therestaurant/bar levels will add exeibemqrt and vi.tality to thepassing pedestrian and draw the passerby up the walkway orthrough the Plaza. The slightly raised dinins patio ailows forviews into the adjacent pedestrian ways and takes advantage ofthe magnlficant views and sr.lrshine while providing a buffEr tothe passerby. E 4.Street Ehclosure j.s i-rnproved by providing an enclosure to thenoiEFEfof-Fouders Plaza, ""ftrer than an unoccupied ho1e. The expansion al-so provides a stepped dor"m edge frcrn the threestory Lazier Arcade Building and developes an encloswe to boththe east and west walkways by providing a counter lo the threestory plaza Lodge (east) and one story Lodge wing (west). Thisalso provides for a desirable enelosure to both walkways Uynarowing doun the pedestriansr view (the canyon effect ) andthen exploding the view to the plaza and the mountain slopes. The Street Erlge is reinforced by varying the facade, ereatinglxterest and activity along the sbreets, walkways and plaza. The step back of the southeast eorrer allows foi glimpses ofwhat 1s beyond without giving bhe entire panorama i:ntil the topof lhe stairease is achieved. The creation of the pabio alcoveoff the mai.n plaza provides for an acfivity pocket bff the mainpedestrian way. The conLinuation of plaza maLerials toward themain entry carry the street edge foward t.his acLivlty generator. 6.E+ildinq Height is consistent with building faces cn opposite fg:l .of the Plaza, providing a gradual step up to adjacent 8. Servlce and Delivery is urchanged and is consistent wlth theuslrlg existlng loadlng and parklng zones presently along Gore Creek Drive. Elnergency aecess isand will continue to access the property frun theand Lodge side easement. buildings' The buildirg is welr below any height requiranenus, and due to lhe snal1 scale of the building, too targe a roofnass would be out of proport,ion. lngllng back the northeast andnorthwest corners also soften the building edge. 7 - views frdn the adjacent properties east and west are uraffecteddFto rarger (3 ano a si,ori) uuiiaings on each slde. The viewsfrcm the Plaza north are r-mchanged duE to the exlsting envelopeof the building directly north of the expansicn. The vlews fromthe south as one approaches the buildlng are narrowed, but onlyas the stairs are approached. foior to this point. the LazierArcade Buildlng- is controlline all views. As-noted in itern 4the views are reopered as the top of the stair cases arereached, providing the expansive views of the mourtaln andslopes- These vier"is w1ll be impacted if future expanslons asproposed on other properties are pursued. Views from theadjacent building (Lazier Arcade Building ) will be impacted atthe second level by the expansion, however, fhese ecrnmercialcondominiuns presently have other views fo corurter the loss ofthis exposure. The third leve1 residentiar condominir.m uritviews will have minirnal obstruetion, as the majority of thebuilding wil] occw below the exlsting solld bilcony railing ofthe urit. established uraffected Wal1 Street, 9. S.m and Sfrade are taken jnto ccnslderation by placing the A&d-oor GEl'o area south of the expansion. Sradjng will occur on lhe pedestrian stairease inrnediately east of the expansion, as it would with any expansion above Wa11 Street 1evel . This shading would occur during the late afternoon hours. SYrading of adjacent property patios and walkways is mjnirnized by the proposal due to higher (3 and 4 story ) Uui.t_0ings directly east and west of the property. Architeetural and Landscaping considerations will be addressed during the design review stages of approvals and sha1l not be expanded upon at thistime. f hope the enclosed information is adequate, and if you need more information or have any questions cn the project, please let me know. Sincerely, ln, ul/l.. t{ lll/ldlll{MltlL, ' t.rttt ttr.uv I-ltt ll'urarg N. anoviqm, rarEner Srovudon and Hopkins - Architects CNS/mp HONG KONG CAFE Lodge a! Vail - Lot A, B, Block 5C, VV 1st (174 E. Gore Creek Dr. ). The Lodge at VaiI. 174 East Gore Creek Drive. Vail , Colorado 81 657 Lazier Arcage-Wall Sl"*L_e"f$gg - Lot C, Block 5C, W lsb (225 WaIISreeE-t--- . hlall Street Condo Assoclation. "/, Brandess & Cadmus Real Est,ate. 281 Bridge Sbreet. Vail., Colorado B'l 657 Plaza Lggge - Lots G, H, I, J, K, Block 5C, W lst (291 Bnidge Sfreet ). The Plaza Lodge. P. 0. Box 68. Vail , Colorado 81658 Lot 1, Fourders Plaza. The Town oT-Tail t l(, ,'r Vail Place ) . P. O. Box 100/ 75 S. Frontage Road. Vail , Colorado 81657 Village Plaza Building - Fesub of LoL C, Block 5C, VV lst, (1ffi % Steve Sjrnonette P. O. Box 41t, Vail ,Colorado Bl658 5C, VV 1st (311 Bridge St,reet)H1II Buildjng - Lot I, Block.-TFs. Banche C. HiIl. 311 Bridge Street. Vail , Colorado 81657 Casino 9uildjng - LoLs DEF, BIrck 5C, W 1st (250 Bnidge Street ). Enidgeslreet Condo Association. ft Brandess-Cadmus Real Estate. 281 Bridge Street, Vail , Colorado 81658 G .:l'* ^'t MEMORANDUM (-/ Z 1,+l TO FRCIM DATE REF Hon 722 ft. o area, which the paraddition does PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION DEPARTIUXNT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 24 April 1928 Hong Kong Cafe request for parking Variance inLazier Arcade Building existin Cafe net atin. The floor plan submitted sltowsdinCode rvould allow a maximum of ts. onng requj-rement is based.e proposed greenhousenot make the structure more non-conforming inany other way. Based upon the ents for Cormtercial Core 1the par Use Permit CONSIDBRATION OF FACTORS (Section 18.62.060) -;' r s have beenanted in CCl because of t-EE-E-esire of strianizee area an nr the lltal1 Act. 1. ?he relationship of the requested. variance toother existing or potentiai uses and structuresin the vicinity. There are severar restaurants with open patios that couldrequest similar pernissi6n to enclose existing patio area. Thestructure is directly adjacent to the pru,za aiei ueing acquired.by the Town of vail and ihourc be studied^ in conjunction with *t3^l|."lLaza rand,scaping and the c;;;;i"-i ""oE".ropment proposedby Vail Associ.ates. 2' The degree to which rerief from the strict or riteralintetrpretation and enforeement of a specified'regulation is necessary to achieve cornpatibilltyand uniformity of treatment among sites in thevicinity or to attain the objectives of this ordinancewithout grant of speeiat priiri-lege. strict interpretation of the ordinanee woulat not a1lowthe proposed buildlng additlon on the site. A number of parkingvariances have been granted in ccl (Red Lions, e.n"ion rsabel,Covered Bridge SLore, Cyrane,s, Sliier BIdg.,'Sheika,s;. Page 2. Memorand. Hong Kong Cafe ' Grant of the parking variance requestwi-th treatment of other sites in the area. 4-24-78 The propr>sed amendment to CCl would not a11ow on-sitepar}<irtg but wou!_L _reggi-re. that parking be provideE-ff:elleer that money be contributed prior to issuance of alffi --------.-Permi-t to provide the public parking spaces necessary to servethe demand generated by the expansion. 3. The ef,fect of the requested va.riance on light andair, distribution of populati"on, transportation andtrafflc facj-lities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. We foresee no ?dverse impaets with the exeeption of thepossible additional d-emffi-Tor b c parking. FINDINGS The Planning Commission.shall make the followingfindings before granting a varj-ance: L. That the granting of the variance will not 'constitute a grant of special privilege inconslstentwith the limitations on other properties classifiedin the same distri ct. See items 1 and 2 under consideration of factors. ;'is consistent 2. That the granting of the variance will not be d.etrimentalto the public health, safety or welfare, or materiallyinjurious to properties or i.mprovements in the vicinity. See General Comments relating to consideration ofcompatibility with the Town Pl.aza and Gondola r redevelopment.lfe feel that Eldon Beck should review and comment on the proposal . 3. That the variance is warranted for one or moreof the following reasons: a. The strict or literal interpretation andenforcement of the specified regulationswould result in practical difficulty orunnecessary physical hardshlp inconsistentwith the objectives of this ordinance. The proposed amendment would make the parklng varianceunnecessarv. The Department of Community Developmentthe requgsted parking v4rianee with the conof a the propose roval PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN THAT Thomas F. Gilbertson, representing the Hong Kong Cafe, has applied for a temporary conditional use permit and a temporary parking variance in order to allow enclosure of patio area with a greenhouse structure. The parking variance is from the provisions of Section 18.52.090 and the Conditional use permit is required by the provisions of Section 18 ,O4,ZgO of the Municipal Code for the Town of Vail. A Public Hearing will be held before the Town of Vail Planning Commission on November Zg,7g7T at 3:00 p,m. in the vail Municipal Bullding in accord with section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code. Zoning Administrator Published in the Vail Trail November 11, L977 a S. Toughilt a a APPL ICAT ION FOR VAR IANCE And/0r CONO I T IONAL USE PERI..1 I T Ord i nance llo. 8 ( Seri es ot l97i) Applicallon Hearing Date F1n3; Decision date for Town Councll (we ) Phone ty) bef ore the Vai I ll/ 776-Ary U/K P lann i ngdc hereby request permission to appearCommission to rqquesf the following: X 1 y;;!;';; " - +,:G A,rt i c | €_,) Zon ing Change from $J Park ing Va r i ancep Condilional Use Permit Section TO'w7 For the Fl li ng C lea r ly to allow ln f o I lo N umbe r v/ i ng escribe DUTDOS and i nten of this ?Fl u feel is the bas is for hardsh i p in -this case? ffiLZ:-;Z.q ignature of pp I icant 'ilr']rl 75 south lrontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 February 4, 1986 office of community development Crai g Snowdon Snowdon & Hopkins 201 Gore Creek Drive Vai1, Co. 81657 Dear Craig: The Communjty Development Staff and members of other departments have reviewed the revised drawings for the Hong Kong Cafe submittal . l.rle haveidentified some areas where additional information would assist us in reviewing this proposal . Those areas are: 1. A view analysis from the area of the l,lall Street staircase adjacent to the existing Hong Kong entry ways; thjs should be done in some sort of graphic manner- 2- A graphic representation of the sun shade considerations preferably in a site plan format that would show us exjsting and proposed sun shade impacts. 3. A title certificate (schedule B) l isting any easements etc.that may be on the property. 4. More information regarding the staircase between the lllall Street buildjng and the Hong Kong Cafe. i believe these are the only areas that need further revjew. If you couldget us this information by February 13 jt will allow us to review thisprior to our scheduled meeiing date in February. Thank You. 5i Ri To RP/bl f