HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5 LOT A GALLERY BUILDING AKA P & R CONDOS GENERAL 1965-1981 LEGALPresent
Chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Ludwig Kuz
Kathy Langenwalter
Jim Shearer
Gena Whitten
Absent
Connie Knight
PI-ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
November 11,1991
Staff
Kristan Pritz
Mike Mollica
JillKammerer
Andy Knudtsen
Shelly Mello
Belsy Rosolack
Larry Eslnrith
The worksession was called to order by Chairperson Diana Donovan at 1:35PM.
1. A request for a worksession to discuss a conditional use oermit to allo^, a seasonal
olant oroducts business in the Heaw Service Zone District.
Aoolicant: RichardDillino/RichardMatthewsPlanner: Jill Kammerer
Jill Kammerer explained the request, and asked applicant Richard Matthews to respond to the
"items for discussion' from the stafl's memo. Mr. Matthews distributed a portion ol the survey
for the area, and indicated the lrailer would be a regular 8' x 20' sales trailer which he
currently owned, with the purpose being to keep the sales attendant warm. The sales area
will be secured by a 4' high snow fence. The lighting for the area would be 100' long strings
of white 'Christmas lights" with light bulbs every 10 feet and larger light bulbs at each tree.
Mr. Matthews explained these lights are sold by Christmas tree business wholesalers. No
more than 40 trees would be on lhe lot at any one time. The business would be open from
November 25 to December 24, and the hours ol operalion would be 10:30AM-7:30PM.
Kathy Langenwalter asked il the lights would be turned off when the business was closed.
Mr. Matthews said they might possibly leave on one string of lights for security reasons.
Regarding signing for the business, the applicant proposed using a banner, which he
illustrated by showing pictures to the Commissioners. Mr. Matthews estimated the size of the
banner/sign was approximately 2 feet by 12 feet or 24 square feet. The wording for the
banner was 'Christmas Trees". Staff informed the applicant that the maximum size the sign
could be in this zone district was 20 sq. ft, and ftat allowable sign size was based upon the
lineal frontage of the business.
Chuck Crist asked if music would be played during the hours of operation. Mr. Matthews was
not sure.
Jim Shearer asked when the trailer would be removed from the site. Mr. Mafthews replied it
would be taken out the day atter Christmas. Jim was concemed about storing 'junk,- (like
saw-horses or trees, which did not get sold). On site, particularly in the area behind the
trailer, Mr. Matthews repeated he would only have 40 trees on the lot.
Richard indicated the trees to be sold would be attached to rebars which had been pounded
into the ground. In response to a question from Chuck Crist, Richard indicated the banner
would be attached to the trailer.
The state requires the trailer be set back 50 feet from the North Frontage Road right of way.
Based on the site plan, it appeared the sales trailer would be approximately 50 feet lrom the
road. Gena Whitten believed it looked a little "tight." She requested the rest ol the survey be
presented. Kathy was concerned about knowing where the property line was, so that the
Commission would know where the trailer was actually proposed to be located and to insure
the business was located entirely on West Vail Texaco property and not in the state right of
way or on adjacent property. Kathy also asked how the fence would be stabilized. Mr.
Matthews said it would be attached to T-posts by black ties.
Diana Donovan believed it was important that everything be located on Mr. Matthew's
property, and that the trailer be removed as soon after Christmas as possible. Diana
suggesied all material be removed from the site by December 26th. Mr. Matthews stated he
had no intention of leaving anything up after Christmas but he was reluctant to commitling to
removing everything from the site by December 26th as inclement weather could make it
impossible for him to comply with this deadline.
Jill reminded the PEC that based on Ordinance 43, Series of 1991 which willallow plant
product businesses in the Heavy Service Zone District, the site must be cleaned with 72 hours
of the date the conditional use permit expires.
Kathy asked that the fence be kept in a straight, vertical position. She thought it would be
nice if the trailer had a red door.
2. A request for a worksession lor a conditional use oermit for an outdoor dininq patio for
the Gallerv Buildinq {Russell's Restaurant). located in the Commercial Core I zone
district. 228 Bridqe Streeya oart of Lot A. Block 5. Vail Villaqe First Filino.
Aoolicant: RonRilev/D.R.Fl.,lnc.Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica presented the request. As this was a worksession, no staff recommendation was
given, but staff raised several issues for discussion. Applicants Ron Riley and Mike
Staughton were present for the discussion.
Ron Riley pointed out that the deck would only be used for 90 days in the summer, and did
not believe it would obstruct views on Bridge Slreet. He believed a summertime
encroachment of 2'-1 172" was minor, stressing the fact that lower Bridge Street was 'sterile,'
and that the dining deck would add interest to the area. He believed that, due to the
popularity ol outdoor dining, a restaurant was almost required to have a dining area outdoors.
Mr. Riley advocated the deck since otherwise there was no visual penetration into the Gallery
Building, and because of that, people could not tell there was a restiaurant contained therein.
Ludwig Kuz was concerned about narrowing Bridge Street, stating it was easily one of the
most congested areas a greatdeal of the time. He was not convinced this was the best use
of public land. Mr. Riley reminded the Commission that this request was only for a 90-day
period each summer. He explained that, in the summer, people walk more slowly than in the
winter.
Jim Shearer was concemed with the use ol public land. He wanted to get Pete Burnett's
opinion on cleaning the streets. Mike said he had spoken with Pete, and Pete indicated that,
if the deck was in place, the south end of Bridge Street would require hand sweeping. Ron
Riley said the distance across Bridge Street would be 13 feet. Mike Straughton said he Town
did not clean the streets every week, but only 2-3 times per summer. Mr. Riley said he could
build the deck so it could be removed tor street sweeping.
Jim discussed the sterility of that end of Bridge Street. He asked what the Town of Vail would
gain lrom the proposal, and suggested Mr. Riley could do something to make the area more
inviting.
Chuck Crist agreed with Ron Riley regarding the sterile look, and liked the concept of a
removable deck. He was concerned with the loss of two Town of Vail planters, as well as the
bench between the planters. He indicated the bench had frequent use. Chuck also was in
favor ol narrower steets and the proposed rekord doors.
Ron Riley was frustrated because no service lrucks were allowed on this end of Bridge Street,
and indicated the upper end of Bridge Street became much more restricted when service
trucks were making deliveries than his proposal would make the area.
Gena Whitten believed that this was an important entrance to the town, and Mr. Riley could
achieve the transparency with a 3{oot wide deck and rekord doors, which would have the
leeling of an outdoor deck without going onto public land. She felt this was very valuable
space.
Kathy agreed with Ludwig and Gena, stating thai rekord doors would give better exposure to
the outside and better planters could be designed. Kathy could not support the construction
o{ a deck on public land, not wanting to further constrict the area. Ron Riley indicated fre
location of the restaurant's restrooms created an interior constriction, and rekord doors alone
would not achieve his objectives.
Diana could not support a deck on public property, but suggested pulling back fre deck. Jim
could also support such a revised proposal. Jim reminded the Commission that the Town was
running out of Village restaurants, and believed undulation on that side of the street was
imporlant, He strongly supported retaining restaurants in the Village core areas, especially
restaurants at street level. However, in this particular situation, he was concerned about
potential bottlenecking.
Ron Riley indicated he would investigate other possibilities to ensure he did not restrict the
area and would look lor a proposal which would enhance the area. He suggested a g0-day
trialbasis.
Chuck st'tpported this use for public land, as it would increase the vitality of an area which was
currently .ugly and dead."
Mike Mollica summarized the Commission's position and stated some of the members had
difficulty in supporting this use of pubtic tand.
1. A rgquest,to amend qection 18.52. Off-Street Parkino and Loadinq. of the Town's
==onino orqilq". !g "ilo*."r rrnt"t br.inmr". to lr"ir *rtin* i.th.
Commercial Core lll zone district.
Aoolicant: Peter Jacobs of Davs lnnPlanner: Andv Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen presented the request. statf supported the proposed amendment.
chuck crist asked if this amendment would allow more lhan one agency per property. He
asked for a simplification of the wording.
Diana Donovan was concerned with the wording regarding the term of the lease. she
requested that section be simplified. She belieied tanOscirping shoutd be required. Kathy
Langenwalter did not think an amendment addressing landscaping would be necessary, as it
was addressed in the parking section of the code. Andy pointed out that the parking iection
dealt only with new parking lots. Diana believed the Town should have the aiitity to- require
additional landscaping for this type of use.
Chuck Crist moved to recommend that Town Council approve the request to amend Section
18.52, Oft-Street Parking and Loading, of the Town's zoning ordinance to allow car rental
businesses to lease parking spaces in the Commercial Core lll zone district, incorporating the
Commission's con@rns into the ordinance regarding the ability of the Town to require
landscaping, allowing the length of lease to range from 1-12 months, and limiting bach
property within CClll to a maximum of one agency with a maximum of 15 cars. lim Shearer
seconded the motion. lt was unanimously approved, 6-0.
2' A request for a conditional use permit to allow a well water treatment tacililv in the
A9rjcultural/Ooen Space zone district. oenerallv located south of the Vail Golf Course
bridoe on vail Vallev Drive. and more specificallv described as follows:
T9 be located within 100{oot radius lrom a ooint on the riqht bank of Gore Creek
Whqnpe lhe northwest corner of Section 9. Townshio 5 South. Ranoe 80 WEst, 6th
P.M. bears North 73 deorees West. 2.080 feet.
Apolicant: Vail Vallev Consolidated Water Distric{Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica explained the request. Staff recommended approval of the request with the
conditions listed in the memorandum.
Discussion ensued regarding whether the proposed structure should become a shelter for
golfers or a utility building which disappeared into the willows. Kent Rose, engineer for the
project, indicated the proposed building was 14' x 24', and the size was necessary in order to
ru
tJ)
f,
E
z
{
=Ful
';E5/OC:ij ! * r=', t ii E::+,Ei E;i 9:€:;:€i; Hi
= ei;; !
r: : E ::
ss i:: ;i! I: i=
;;!+Eiziai.4i
.E. - E Ei
€is:i:
€dug:;i:-E E 5 E
rs:t:?;
T\
co
r.o
N
)
U
F.
c{'@ro
Fl
z
cfI
IE
NIco
(-')
I
El(ulxl
-l
=
U
(5z.
J
=cO
eLdJJ
(5
z
A'F Ya\ F-arH9!)f>x
at+
Edxa<vX/aFz"v)zJ
E=?,.=Qou:
i5=LrJ :\ -1<x=L! F. -J<h.a5=ooE z
UTE!:ir-{}ioBel=zf'. lL >
=o6rJ{.3Eu.r!l
FtrF5rrJ ,, -.:E*o>P;nO€ru3
HFIr\JFl\VEoIAFZU.-ffi<EOSXH
"nl-Y*F$3H
ts
-aA.
Fit,Ft
Hka
ilief
FR
mts
-rlJaH
ail-:t
-H
Fa
fF)
E't
tF.
sv
lF.
-:
--a11le
:aLIP-rat
*FlrpLfH
EY
tt{
11
6.
{rlaL.
flJtF{rlJtlrt
LrA.
€
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
{".aHe(/#.r'\/4 L
t--h4rz 72 "3
Owner, Address and Phone:
4"tO tDSa
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptio n,tor ttu4 , #x
Comments:
./ t,'
Filing Zone
-
5t...'r'/g"2.- -?t***l'^
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
(- oqL-J
Sum mary:
64l;.fft \' ,,9), Lf|^\V R\A.Z SLl /"r\.1" I d4 )
D Statt Approval
7
J
=T
c.
;
F
Et-
oo
.!
o
|r
Y
oc
L! tu
:;
:,!
F:
Z4a;a1
D.:i
.: X; |').i
-LIf-ifq)6 q c -:!Q(!(')Y
coo9!
.Yc 5 o9;o)co-o;.: (U - (g
eEP.eBc*o>u
Y'" =,o c:a: r 3
=-FJ
= -
\r'-;=c,u-c;'-(6c
:;i="
niioQ
'F g'P
-ooa:-E o B;:-^^Y: c =J d
"
* - J ,,
.:=((li:,:
,"i11 l:la.': -: r
iio ^c l.l OECv:-
", (B='" Y'; -go.:(dch:rJ
-C Ct s J=
_.:E50<u o'-: -
oal-::
0):BEr
35>.=Eo 6--; c)c - !+* >j(XtoqH;R-A-- ni v13 0>ioco
-oru-ct_9E"ar -fdl c o.l trt .!li b b': i
-o(d::
l
o
a
b
\'(
v
1\
"l
zq
l-
J:l
U'z
an
LIJ
UJ
F
ur
oz
L
t
UJ
tl
-l
=l
tr
ul
uJzY
iF
"1
t-a
'-)
zo
F(L
ul
:<
(D
ot-
L
=cc||l
u-
Ocn
tL u.)o c-t
-.+
I
o
'-uo
UJ
z
a
LUo-
J
z
ao
O
Hl IBl I
I,+l I$t Iut I'.lllHt I5l ol8l =lEt gt
ol Crltrl :l'xl alu>l?l xl
IItzl
rl ;'-r
r"l
|.r1
I
cr:'
ol,l
sl
cclrl
al>l(l.l
ol
zl
:'l
9l
z
(J=zzc)o
=z
d
.Ec
o
Lz,.
OzZ-
do3rt
U'
Ezlzo
F
oo
:ooo
I
I-l
H u.rbkzo
c{ lltr)ilorlF\ llIl|o\ll$llo\ ll
.tl
:ll
f-l
b
E
tt-l
o-zo
tr(J
:)EFazo()
.< ,i' a) :1
=(l
.{O(-) -
\.
('i'.
l|
r-.1.
:---
o
I
d
\.)
F
z.
o
l
lu
(Jz
z6
=f
r!
UJ
z
tr
UJ
E
=ul;
T'J
CC
o6
LUo
i-
t!o
?z
LU
a
L!
F
=
F
oI
l
@
J uJ
NOrtvntv^
Y
3
LL
z
tr
a()
!!lo
J
ulz
o
=>oa
-rt'l
zzo9
F^AXf,zF90
<toZ;O(J(JZrr<
>(J
tr
f,
CloE
ea
TJJE
?<
)
z
E
X
z
tr
ulF
X
3
z
9l
rl
al>l
tLlcl
'71
=la'
N|.n
F-
IO'\t
LJ
Edtr
:lol
uJl
rEl
Jl
al>l
tl.Iol
4,"
+J
o()
r{(s
$
a1
E
(J
a-:rt
Fl
::
.:
.rt
H!oor{r.r
Rz
JJo
c,
(u
.J
..1
(U
z1
LL
1l
tl
tlr
Icn,'-l
r-{
z
qJ
.J
a
lt-
zl
C
Zrc
iJ
":.
I
I
I
'l+Jl
EIIrl
r\l
I
cJl
cJl
EI
cJtavl
tllrlol
5lr\' I
I
':. :
_.-
..,.--{'at':
| +rl olEl Ilgl c| +Jl Ifl-l R.9 AoJ -I
r-l €'l ttrt .rl It4 l.{ |s{ cql -cl colt4l c\ |I C\lMI'I (/{ "Jd fl :..1
p.l EgtctJ
"j :a .)
o
JI
o
E
€t
r--{
t.'
o)
.-r
c,
J--! <
o(J=z=z
-5<
alL!=
EtsS
F
ul
o-
c{)
E<
o9
:9
cd
FJrE E=O u'l .i.ui;
: =o-LJ U-: oo
,*l
tI]
ot-
Joirn M Perkins/Architect, AIA/Voil Rufesort, 1000 Lions RicJge Loop/p.O.tNoil, Colo. 81652303-47&3515
13 April 1983
Steve Patterson
Building Official
Town of Vail
74 Sonth Frontage Road li'est
Vai1. Colorado 81657
Dear Steve;
This letter is to reiterate in writing the following points dis-
cussed and agreed upon in our joint meeti-ng on 13 April 1983'
Electr ical
A. A11 exposed work not in conduit will be replaced ln
conduit .
B. Areas not exposed may remain as is unless the elec-
trieal contractor has good reason to befieve that the
work is defective or is an overload of a particufar
circuit. Should this work be deemed to be defective
or overloaded, the cavity in question will be opened
and efectrical work will be replaced in conduit 'c. The floor/ceiling cavitles between basement and flrst
floor and between'first floor and second ffoor are
the two cavities least 1ike1y to be opened. No re-
wire in these areas w111 be required unless wiring is
found to be defective or overl0aded and the overl0aded
condition can not be corrected at the panel'
Automatic Sprinkler System
A. It is clearly agreed that no automatic sprinkler sys-
tem of any kind is required for the Gallery Building'
Re
1.
Ore llouse Bathroom Eequirement s
A. lr{ens: 1w.e., 2 urinafs, 1 J-av.
B. I!'omens: 2 w.c., 1 1av.
C. We will rearrange and revise our plumbing fixture
'fayouts to comply with A. and B. above.
Future Occupancy Calculation Considerations
A. For usable retail space at. the basement and first
f loors , 15 s. f . ,/person wi-11;be used.
B. For non-usable space @ the basement and first floors'
ie. storage, kitchens, back bar, disco control , video
. game r coat closets' etc. r 50 s.f-lperson will be used'
Fire Protection
A. An approved, monitorecl smoke and heat detection system
shall be installed per the Town of Vail's Retrofit Or-
dinanees,
B. A 3" dry standpipe shal1 be installed rvith access on
the east elevation of teh building to the second floor
corridor.
C. Flamable rva11 and ceili.ng materials in the first floor
restaurant shall be treated with Class "A'l flame re-
tardant product throughout.
D. Consideration sha1l be given to locating a door at the
rtest end of the second floor corridor ' Door to be e-
quipped rvith magnet latch and smoke closure device'
E. Fire extinguisher cabinets to be located at both ends
of the second floor corridor.
F. Seperation rvalL at the Slifer Building sha11 be built
of 8" c.oncrete masonry units to 8" above the Slifer
roof and 2x6" wood, t hour construction, with clerestory
windo'ws up to the Gallery Building roof .
6. Basement Exits
A. Northeast exit from basement must be redesigned to as-
sure that the door srving complies r'vith U'B'C' requrre-
menls.
Nlechan lcal
A. A11 mechanical work sha11 comply with aJ"1 applicable
mechanical codes including the 1982 Uniform }lechanical
Code.
Ternporary Certificates of Occupancy
A. It u'as agreed that T.C.O.s will be issued for the lower
floors (basenent and first floors) as these spaces are
suf{icientf}' completed to open for business'
B. It is understood that water damage or other problems
resulting from construction above could possibly result
in the closure of tbese businesses until such problems
are recl- if ied.
t.'I
Steve, Please circulate this
for their slgnature:
Town of Vail Fire Department
letter t.o the following departments
.Town of Vail llealtb DePartment
Town
Thank
of Vail
voll ,
Building Departme$t
ohn M. Perkins
luwn
75 south fronlage rtl.
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 475-7000
department of community development
April 11, .l983
John Perki ns
P.0- Box 266
Vail, C0. 81658
Dear John:
0n April 6, 1983 the Design Rev'i ew Board gave final approval to the
Gallery Bujlding Addit'ion and Remodel . Below 'i s a list of condjtjons
placed upon that approval:
1). Design Review Board will see revised east elevation (windols,
naterials) at their May 4, 1983 meeting.
2). Agreement needs to be reached with Town Councr'l concerning
encroachments on town property before a building permit is
i ss ued.
3). A parking fee wjll be assessed before a building permitis issued.
4). An agreement concerning the trash compactor should be drawn
up among interested property owners. Such an agreement and
a design and site plan for the compactor should be broughtto the DRB by Juiy 6, 1983.
5). Mill Creek should be protected from all construction activity.
A sturdy construction fence should be erected five feet from
the stream bank and mai ntained at all times durjng construction.
6). Public Works and Fire Departrnent approval shall be required
before a building permit js issued.
Any changes to the exterior design or materials should be brought to
the Design Review Board.
Good luck,
/-/-'"'-./^ /(Hm 5aVf e
Town Pi anner
JS/bb
1r,.*t-
l[;?:l.r.r.d to approv-o? variance as requeste::'rr:':jf: ,,..no second to his
Trou t moved to aDprove' a three foot setback variance which would allow for an
00 ntr.y, Pierce seco e vote was n tavor, I aqainst an, who feltis was beinq arbitra Corcora.n abstained. The motion pass
uest to modif the lain n lot A block 5 Vail Vil la e lst Add tionr to remo p1 icant:
berm would be placed
been considered as wel'l ,to Hydro-Triad, he wasculvert behind the Red
did not impact the
ey
Ron Riley.explat'ned that there were a'lmost no impact upon Gore Creek by the 6 inch!"*. Ruder added that the engineers sectioned the crbef Jvery 1O to 2O-i."i f"o*East Vafl to Intermountain whei they examined it for flooding.- Trout "anteJ-to knowif the Town staff had revjewed the itudy. patten remjnded him that the Town did notempioy a hyro engineer.
The rock wall was discussed, and Ruder stated that R_iley has agreed to landscapethe TOV-property as part of the approval process in DRB, but that the wall had beenadded. af-ter the fact. . Patten addeb that there was some question as to whether ornot the TOv had agreed to db the rock watl or-piit oi irrJ-rocr warr.
Pierce stated that he would like to take the plan one step further and place a hard
:!rrla99 under the-picnic table and between thb picnic tabie and the steps.--H* r.ttthat the TOV shou'l d build the wall as wett, tor'ilre iorne"-was an important one andneeded to be cleaned up.
Trout ntoved and Pierce seconded to approJsd-llq.-modilication to the floodplain as
+.uest to amend Chanter 18.69, Hazard Re ul ati ons of the Vail l4unici I CodenF.lavi toc with t minimum Federa standar s of Section oftonaoonsurancecanr:own of \/a
Jim Sayre explained the memo and his research on the subject. He said that the
lT:::-,:::.rll^l.l;tuil:_.to adopt a.new-set of maps unu io-uaopt regulatoiy ,nuusrres.:lI::^T:!! :Y:i.th. lensthv
'"'nb uno u^pi;i';; ;;5; ;;"'il";";5"#;;";;fi;i',' Fil;;;i
v
"io"'iii. p"i'li""r' III.i".i"r,and ihp l-lrrdr n-Tv'i:/ -+i,1., .^.^ rL^ |,i:1,,il:-ll9:o-lliug^:tudy.for ti,. wuit-vili ;;;".--Ii;;,';;-;";; ;;; #;;;; ,#;l;requirementS, the TOV nrult also adopi-"egulaiio;i .oniuining the substantiai
::ll:_ll_,tlructures.,jn. the ftooapta!n.' Donouun moved and pierce seconded to
rsYuIrErrrerrL5, f,rre luv rnust also adopt reguiations concerning the substantiai improve-ments of structures in the fl oodpla!;.'-donovan moved and Fi*... seconded roreconjrnerid to Council'5-u-;- E;-o@ffi ?7478-3lThe v o t e T./A S
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Aprill 'l'l , 1983
2:00 Site Inspections
3:00 Publ ic Hearing
'1. Approval of minutes of March 14 meeting.
2. Request for a sjde setback varJance in order to bujld an addition onlot 7, b'lock 7, Bighorn 5th Addition. Applicants: Davjd & Duanne Rogers
3. Request to modify the floodplain on lot A, block 5, Vail Village lst
Addition in order to remodel the Gallery Bui'lding. Appiicant: Ron Riley
4. Request to amend Chapter .|8.69, Hazard Regulations, of the Vai'l Munic'ipai
Code in order to comply w'ith the minimum Federal standards of Section'1361 of the Nationa'l Flood Insurance Act of 1968. Applicant: Town
of Vajl
Published in the Vail Trail April B, 1983.
FROM:
Tn.
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Department of Cormunjty Development
Planning and Environmenta'l Commissjon
April 7, l9B3
Request for floodplain modification for th' remodel of the
Gai1ery Building. Appl icant: Ron R'i1ey
Last summer the PEC approved a proposal to remodel and add a condominium to
the Gallery Bui'l ding. In conjunction with that proposal it was discovered that
part of th-e buildin! l ies within the .loo-year floodplain. The zon,jng code allows
a'lteration of the fJoodplain under certain criteria. The app'licable section
reads as follows:
r8.64.040 E.
The zoning adninjstrator may require any appl icant or person desiring to modify
the floodplain by fill, conltruction, channelization, grading, or other similar
changes, to submit for review an environmental impact statement in accordance
with-.|8.56 to establish that the work will not adversely affect adiacent properties,
or increase the quantity or velocity of flood waters. (0rd l2' '1978)
PROPOSAL
The app'l icant proposes an earth berm to the east and north of the bui] ding on
Town property for protection against f't ooding. The elevat"ions of the proposed,
berm meei thb required specifjiations according to Hydro-Triad, Ltd. The staff
fee'l s that the earth berm and assocjated landscaping is the best a'l ternative
to so] ve the problem.
BAC KGROUN D
ENVIRONMTNTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Please find attached Hydro-Triad's report addressing the criteria in '18.69.040(E)
R ECO{'IMEN DATION
The Department of Community Development recommends approva'l of this request to
alter the floodplain. In cases such as this, we must rely upon the experts (i.e.
the hydrologic engineers) with regard to the impacts of the proposal . They have
reported that negligible impacts would result. We feel that aesthetically theproposal represents the best solution.
Project Application
,i
' ':,: ,o f; i."'Proiect Name: ",'. ' " ' !'{4r {:' I il,' .
project Descrip r,"^ ig!')rnAk/ *--/ ,4"ta'/to--'
contactpersonand rnon" r-./atirs rh. F*,'rltas
,4,o &* 'tixp t-b,'/ 6 " D/ag, 6 4 7a " 3s/5
Owner, Address and Phone:rfn /71- fu ._5;
728 G.'dzrc sT,. /a, /' A " B/e7tb
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legat Descriptio n' ,o, P4zc/A ,
"ro"r
Filing /:E*Zone
-
Comments:
id\,/ Hal
ta4-it* (
;|.4 C 1r"l T-J
-l4f o\ A
Design Review Board
sr'r
/^i tl
CVL"f t Ft c A't€-. 0F uclwrt& ti c-!
\.d t+rrt Ht- L* /LJ'I J, t 5t-1y'4 (' " c-'
| :" ,o'iAJ ,J 41'4
DISAPPROVAL
Motion by:
Seconded by:
{Plb wtl.t
I tA;f Ff f rtNt, rtt ll4<
f RO IL(.T' HtLL ca_EEt<, r.zzoN) <,oNfia.e crtlJr,J
4L -t tvt T\/ , Lf N( f s- ' f.ao/_t E4
^)
\ ) r-t64f
tr't4tL rHE {.D t'lt-t*,tA a OUAJ C, / L-(otlLf a.
^l Lr F ++C.rto,gtil NX{'J o To\^J f tt2E-@P4L1 t'tr'lt'fu&utt- LD,\AR S ,jx'0 a
Et.-Y vA+to4 AnEetAtd-\
summary: !fr-As/+ f 4*r-qsv'a E- fl,arg Hxl.rr 4 No &btst t
^)
t"*'Tr"ffi AaP.apvAL - FEQvtrze' lJ Staft Approval
75 south frontage rd.
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
Apri l 4, 1983
T0 t'lHOl4 IT l'4AY C0NCERN:
The fol lowing is a summation of the Fire Department, Building Department,
and Health Department's knowledge of the wrongfu'l conditions in the
Galiery Building, Va'i1, Colorado. The information is divided into 3
separate occupant groups -- (tst f1 oor) Ore House, (basement) Dr. John's,
(upper floor) offices, which are then categorized as (1) mandatory'83
repairs before 7-83, (2) shall do within given time frame, (3) should
do prior to more extensive deterioration. Most items were discussed
'i n a joint meet'i ng with the leasees and on numerous inspections by
the Fire Department, Health Departrnent, and Building Department.
Enforceable action has been delayed due to anticipated remodeling of
the build'ing. However, future extended time periods because of antjcipated
remodel'i ng'i s not seen as a possibility in this case. The item #'s
will be taken by number from the attached information sheets from |V|ike
McGee and Ruth Cogan to Dick Ryan.
U.B.C. = BZ Uniform Building Code
U.F.C. = 82 Uniform Fire Code
U.M.C. = 82 Uniform Mechanical Code
U.P.C. = 82 Uniform Plumbinq Code
N.E.C. = 81 National Electric Code
N.F.P.A. = 82 National Fire Protection AgencyS.R. = State Reg.M.M. = Mike McGee LetterR.C. = Ruth Cogan Letter
Page 2
Should doItem #'s
1st floor
Ore House
Mandatory'83 Shall do by
3313 (A)
u.B.c.
3314(A,B,C)
U.D.L.
14.(M.M.)
B. (M.M. )
c . (M.M. )
D . (M.M. )
E. (M. |\1. )
F. (M.|\,|. )
2. (M.M.)
3. (M.M.)
4. (M.M. )
5. (M.M.)
6. (M.M.)
3303 (c )
U.B.C.
3301( c )
u.B.c.
3314 (A )
u.B.c.
3304(H)
u. B. c.
7. (M.M. )
8. (M.M. )
e. (M.M.)
10. (M.M. )
11. (M.M.)
410-3
N. E. C.
410-56( B)
N. E. C.
3202(A)
u.B.c.
380-4
N.E.C.
12.104 (B)
u. F. c.
300-5(d)
rI .E.L.
4204
u.B. c.
4305
u.B.c.
3305 (c )
u.B.c.
1i.404ra
1i.404
U.F.C.
Item #'s
12. (|'l.M.)
13. (M.M.)
14. (M.M.)
15. (M.M.)
16. (M.M.)
17. (M.M.)
18. (M.M. )
1e. (M.M.)
20. (M.M.)
21. (M.M.)
22. (M.M.)
23. (M.M. )
24. (M.M.)
25. (M.M.)
26. (M.M.)
27. (M.M.)
28. (M.M.)
2e. (M.M.)
30. (M.M.)
37. (M.M.)
110-2
tr.E.L.
380-15
N. E. C.
300-4
N.E.C.
Chapt.20
u.M.c.
See Health - Ruth Cogan
110-16
t\l tra
706 U.B.C.
i706 u.B.c.
4305
u.B.c.
3oo-5(d)
N. E. C.
Mandatory '83 Sha'll do bY
Can be done at meter
N.F.P.A. 96
10.315-(7-83)
U .F.C.
Page 3
Should do
Chapt. 20
u.M.c.
11.203(B)
u.F.c.
11.404tra
See Health - Ruth Cogan letter
74.r07
u.F.c.
See Health - Ruth Cogan letter
410-4
N.E.C.
N.E.C.
Page 4
Mandatory '83 Sha11 do by Should do
ord . 5 . 28- ( 1 1-83 )s.R. 7-101 ,7-202,
i0-402y
Item #'s
1. (R.c.)
Upstairs Offices
32.
2. (R.C.) Ord.5.28-(11-83)
s.R. 7-LlI,7 -202
3. (R.c.)
4. (R.c. )
5. (R.c.)
6. (R.C.) Ord.5.28
s.R.3-201
7.
8. (R.c.) 0rd.5.28
s.R. 10-402X,2-402
e. (R.c.)
10. (R.C.) 0rd.5.28
s.R. 10-402ddg,5-202
11. (R.c.)
12. (R. c. )
13. (R.c.) Ord.5.28
s . R. 6-702
14. (R.C.) Ord. 5.28
s.R. 7-402
ls. (R.c.)
Ord. 5.28-(11-83)
s.R. 10-402T, 7-501
Ord . 5 .28- ( I 1-83 )
s .R. 7-201
0rd.5.28-(11-83)
s.R. 4-302-306,10-402W
Ord.5.28-(11-83)
s.R. 7-602,L0-402dd2
Ord. 5.28-(11-83)
s.R.7-401
Ord.5.28
s.R.6-401A
Ord . 5.28
s.R.7-202
Ord. 5.28
s.R. 4-208
4305
u.B.c.
3306J
u.B.c.
Item #'s
JJ.
J+.
35.
36.
Mandatory '83
380-4
N.E.C.
Shall do by
t't.E.L.
N.F.P.A. 96
11-83
3302
u.B.c.-(11-83)
Page 5
Should do
11.201
u. F.c.
2608 (c )
U.D.L.
Chapt.20
u.M.c.
r212
u.B.c.
Chapt.
u .M.c.
Chapt.
u .M.c.
4305
u.B.c.
Basement
Dr. John's
38.
?a
40.
4r.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
300-5d
N.E.C.
300-4
N.E.C.
305d
384
N.E.C.
11 .203CFn
20
20
48.
49.
50.300-4
N.E.C.
74-107
U. F. C.
51.
Item #'s
52.
53.
qA
Mandatory
12.174
u.F.c.
Shal'l do by
Page 6
Should do
12 .103
u.F.c.
12 .103tra
'93
,"rt"*oN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
/1-''DATE 3lz "/rr g"
- a\.
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES THUR FFI
rZ
READY FOR
LOCATION:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
T] ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING -tr INSULATION POOL/ H. TUB
-tr SHEETROCK NAIL
ELEGTR!CAL:
T] TEMP. POWER
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
;f
I
*.,jn- *-
flre department
an and I conductedI have listed our
-lii {.
42 west meadow drlve
Ysll, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
DICK RYAN
MI KE McGee
ORE HOUSE
3/ 23/ 83
ME14O
TO
F R0t'l
RE
DATE
As per your request of 3/76/83, Gary Murrla " survey " of the 0re House on the 15th.
observations be'l ow.
ORE
l.*r< r z_//z/G)
:. 7z ttLl (l)
?c,r-3cl(-)
ta77.7s j(c-)
.- tZ - tlL/ (.-)
7< ilot. (4)
rc ,n ro"-o/t t 2 .
| 4zrVA,oi
1 e, r-3.3
-5. /.7 "e1'/z''l
ac, A3ef 3.
.< gi.t oz/ 4 .
e( gs.tolt s.
.r. e.f. to'/ 6.
,rj(- 33oi{:) 7 ,
7. J 3o'r' (c \
'. 7' "-71O",
8 '
--. -6;. t 3t/ 9 .
HOUSE
The exi ti ng i s i nadaquate due to;a. the exi t I j ghts a re outb. the exit sign over the front door is not the right sizenor is it lightedc. the two f ront ex'l ts are too c'l ose togetherd. one of the front exits is obstructed by the dfning table. the near ex'i t i s not markedf, the rear exit has no steps to grade (apx. 3'beIow the
The flame spread rating of the cedar pane'l ing and cork cei1ing
constitutes a serious threat to the occupants in the event ofa fire. 0dds are that the room would be engulfed in flame before
everyone could escape.
The cork ceiling does not have a fire rated back'lng in some areas
The light fixtures are hanglng by the wires jn the dining room.
T.he duplex e'l ectrjcal outlets on the walls in the dining room
need P rings.
fl oor
The water leak from the roof behind thewall drips into the electrical outlets.
Inadaquate headroom at the arch at the
Both front doors are deadbolted
pane I i ng on the sout h
hostes s stati on
r
i
There is open wiring in the overhang outside the front door
o
a(. f
lulln u llill
{2 wesl meadow drlve
vall, colorado 81657, (303) 476-22Os
ORE HOUSE
fire deparlment
-'< F ';. D't' 16
.nr.- 4 3 17,r/A ? (
. - ttta.- 1t- '1 . -'/
vn4.l I d
:c t<. )t{
./z< to 3t)
...'s- ; f. ,'ott'
't= <- ir f . 'o'r
,,ic- ?6
-4
-a
9 s-. ',o"
z3c 7a d
a< t 7--6
,.43o;'
10.
11.
L2.
13.
74.
15.
18.
19.
2A.
2t.
2?.
?3.
-2-
The l ight fixture needs a cover to protect from physical damage
The gas fireplace should be made to conform to UMC stds.
The shut.off for the gas i n the fireplace J s l naccessabl e-
The kitchen staff was 'cooking without the fj'lters to the
hood system in place
Draft stops are needed on both sides of the kitchen hood.
Electrjca'l iunction boxes in the ertry to the prep area do
not fi t properly
The main electrical panel ls not adaquat'ly 1abe1ed.
The entjre exhaust duct should be replaced because is is not
the right gauge meta'l , the seams are not'l iquid tight, the.
cleanouts ire-not seal.ed properly and the termination of the
exhaust duct is not iri compl lance Yi'th UBC, UFC, UMC or NFPA.
There is open wiring above and belou, the dishwasher
The makeup a'i r duct 1s't noperative-
They are still thaw{ng out frozen fi,sh and meat out in the open
The mai n eI ectri cal servi ce i s i naccessabl e and overl oaded
The rear stajr to Dr. Johns is an open and constjtutes an open
shaft. The kitchen exhaust duct friin Dr.Johns runs in the shaft
The ent'l re rear area of the 0re House i s not f i re rated (wa1'l s or
cei'ling )
0pen electrical above the walk-ln cooler
Very poor housekeeping ln the coo'l en room
There are no drains for the cooler or f'l oor to handel the conden:-
sation.
.+ //
- 24.
z.j1; zs.
26.
F
,.-t
42 west meadow drlve
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
ORE HOUSE
27. Compressed gas cy'l
28. They should cover
29. Install a floor si
30. Can 'lights in the
-3-
inders are not secured
and cl ean a'l 'l baseboard
nk below the prep table
cei'l j ng are not tented j
. -. ,31.i _-t*
fire departmenl
heaters
and dishwasher
n combustibl e const.
;.L- -
luwn n lltl
't,.c77.F7
,F. // //o/,/
UPSTAI RS
. 31.
r7B< tt 3.t i- 32 .
/it< //. 7oi 3 3 .
ft f ,Dzt 34.
35.
2fi',- 2 o 3d.
f/.,2-6'at7/
',8( 3i'f('')
,:=q5.i , :Y/
,,".: gf'til
..s c S;f tJ't
/::c ?ilsl
/;a /lLc3 <
Handrai I s
There are
The trashfi re rated
on the stajrs are mlssing.
hol es i n the ce i I i ng above the exteri or bad cony
enclosure for the rea'l estate office should be
The ice f'l ow should be removed from the electrical flxtures
The roof overhang needs better support
llood braclng beneath Dr.Johns kitchen exhaust vent ls illegal
nr. Johns
37. l,later is 'leak'ing out of the Ilght fixtures
38. Head c'l earance ls lnadaquate below the dance floor l ighting
39. 0pen wlring to the dance floor'llghtlng
40. Exposed broken I ight blubs on the dance f'l oor
41. 0pen wiring at the 0.J. booth
4?. Hain electrlcal panel ls not flush wlth box and ls wlre nutted
43. Storage in the boJ'ler room ls prohiblted
-,4 -
;.alrAL.1;. ,^Li.'-
./r'/A ? {
.,.c /O.St{
n? <. z o
^/,-?A 7 /
i.< /o. 3,o z
'rt<,24
'?4f (
ec- q3tf .
j< 33oz
F< E{
/ot '
f od
/07
n<74/./o7
fcr:2-,t/t/
/<-2 s. joL
,<|2-laj
'aa ,,2- ttc3
y'.-,"1t"
,/-1 2/.
44. The boller room door should have a self c.l osure
45. A spJash guard is requined between the deep fat fryerand open flame devices
46. The gri11 extends beyond the hood in violation of uMcUFC, and NFPA
47. 0ne make up air Vent is missing a cover1s obstructed
42 west meadow drlye
Yatl, colorado 81557
(303) tl76-2200
ORE HOUSE
48. Kitchen has missing cei I i ng
49. The stage has been replacedoccupant load was heard, andthe cond'ltion that the stage
50. The e'lectri cal wl ri ng to theof the El ectr.ical Code
flre deparlmenl
-4-
gri'l-1 and the other
ti I es
af ter an appea'l f or i ncreasedthe increase was granted on
be remo ved .
band equipment is ln vio'l ation
51. Compressed gas cy'l inders are not secured
52. The exit light at the rear door 1s'partia'l'ly inoperable.
53. Beer kegs are obstructing the rear exjt.
54. The egress windows behind the bar are inaccessab'l e; thiswould require the basement to be sprlnk'l ered.
These conditions have existed for over a year in some cases. Almostall of these v1o'lations have been brought to the iit""iion-of themanagers v'ia vail Fire Department corriction Notlces. Llttle or nocompliance has been achieved, despite "promises " to correct the same
cc : Dlck Duran
Gary Murrian
Steve patterson
John Perki ns0re HouseDr. Johns
t
.t _.
-.-.r,:.&: 1*L-
luwn u |lil
42 wesl meadow drlve
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
DICK RYAN
MI KE McGee
ORE HOUSE
3/ 231 83
flre departmenl
MEMO
TO
F R0r'l
RE
DAT E
As per your
a tt survey t'
observati ons
ORE HOUSE
reques t of 3/16/83, Gary {l.llan-and I conducted
of tn. 0re House on tn! fStn. I have 'listed our
be'l ow.
l.The exi tj ng i s j nadaquate due to;
il- i-t'"
-uiit 'li shts are out 3 3 t 3 rl
b. the exit sign-over the-f-ron.t-dooris not the rioht size
nolis it lidni"i' '"'r-3'ii4"s -' 3-3ls s 33i'/e
,"nr'ii'u two ironi ex.lts are too close together 33,o3 L
d. one of the froni exits ls onsiructed-by the dining tab1e33c:]!
;: iii" ""u" ex'it i s not marked 3 3 /// x.
f . the rear exit has no steps to -siua!,
\;yl'U3'be'low the f'loor )
The f1 ame spread rating of the cedar panefing and cork cejlins
const'i tutes a serious Ihreat to the otcupants-in.the event of
a fire. 0dds are that the room would be engulfed in flame before
everyone could escaPe
The cork ce.i 1 .i ng does not have a f j re rated backl ng i n some areas '
#,tto
-I'o'I
l$u- |
-J 3'
Net 4.
t"lnt u'
The 'li ght f i xtures are hangtn'g by the wires in the dining room'
The duplex ei
need P rings.
ectrica'l outlets on the xalls in the din'ing room
The water'l eak from the roof behind'the paneling on the south
wall drips into the electrical out'lets' 3 2d 2 '4
Inadaquate headroom at the arch at the hostess station
Both front doors are deadbolted 33/7 1)
There ls open wiring in the overhang outside the front door
rto'! L\496'381'q u"
1313-' :'
,"|Ff ^ 1'-.t*9 -n.
tt'v-
-roil a
at
10s
'!-
42 west meadow d rlve
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
ORE HOUSE
fire deparlmenl
-2-
The Iight fixture needs a cover to protect from physical damage
The gas fireplace shou't d be made to conform to uMc stds.
The shutoff for the gas in the fireplace'r s lnaccessabre.
The kitchen staff was'cooking without the filters to thehood system in place
Draft stops are needed on both sides of
Electrical junctjon boxes in the entrynot fit properly
The main electrical panel js not adaquat'ly'l abeled.
The entire exhaust duct should be replaced because is is not
!l: "ight gauge metal, the seams are not l;quia-iigl,t, th; -
creanouts are not seal.ed properly and the termination of theexhaust duct is not iri coinpliance with UBC, UFC, UMC or NFpA.
There is open wiring above and below the dishwasher
The makeup air duct 1s {noperative.
They are stl'l 'l thaw'tng out frozen fish and meat out in the open
The main electrical service is inaccessable and overroaded
Illrli'"rii"I i.ifl"iffi I i.i
"l3;'ol:s"
;;l' :l;:'i; iil".3fr i *
The-entlre rear area of the 0re House is not fire rated(wa)ls orceiling )
4. 0pen el ectri ca'l above the wa'l k- i n
the kitchen hood.
to the prep area do
cooler
er room
or floor to handel the conden:
-',o- U E' ts'
FVz.
10.
11.
72-
13.
14.
23.
,r:?_.-y,rv 25. Very poor housekeeping 1n the cool
26. There are no drains for the coo.l ersati on.
l,l'r:-M-r,
|yo-,f n.
^nc'4ilr6t 18
//l- grra rs '
20:
tuun u l|tl
{2 west meadow drlve
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
ORE HOUSE
27. ComPressed gas cY1
28. They should cover
29. Instal'l a floor si
30. Can ljghts in the
U PSTA I RS
31.
flre dep€rtment
._i
-3-
inders are not secured
and c'l ean al I baseboard heaters
nk below the prep tab'le and dishwasher
cei 1 i ng are not tented i n combusti bl e const '
L\'iY- 32'
33.
93;ts '
36.
,4 ur'
Handrails on the stairs are mlssing'
ThereareholesinthEceilingabovetheexteriorbalcony
The trash enclosure for the real estate office should be
fire rated
Theicef.lowshouldberenovedfromthee]ectrica]fixtures
The roof overhang needs better support
llood bracing beneath Dr.Johns kitchen exhaust vent 1s illegal
Johns
ilater i s I eaki ng out of the 'li ght f i xtures O&: Aor^stt-
Head cl earance j s .i nadaquate bel ow the dance f 'l oor 1i ghti ng
0pen wi ri ng to the dance fl oor i 19hti ng
Exposed broken light blubs on the dance floor
0pen wiring at the D-J. booth
l,lain electrical panel is not flush wjth box and ls wlre nutted
Storage in the boiler room is prohibited
,^tfr\Fzt'
/ Nf--38'
#{'-::
,Joo''r-! otT*t'
flq ./ fL-42'
if q ^'e 43'
fiI 'L
T
rt'
i,
It
i
J.-...-g
ttli
ORE
44.
45.
46.
42 wesl meadow drlve
ralt, colorado 81657
(303) 475-2200
HOUSE
fire department
-4-
self closure
the deep fat fryer
in violation of UMC,
cover gri 1.1 and the other
t i I es
af ter an appea'l f or i ncreasedthe increase was granted onbe removed.
band equipment is 1n violation
The bo'l I er room door shoul d have a
A sp,l ash guard i s requi red betweenand open flame devjces
The grill extends beyond the hoodUFC, and NFPA
-- <=--_-
0ne nake up ai r Vent i s mi ss i ng a
I s obstructed
Kitchen has missing cej'ling
The stage has been replacedoccupant I oad was heard, andthe condition that the stage
The e'l ectri ca'l wl ri ng to theof the Electrica'l Code
irli{Lcz '
,.1l--qa.| | t---
49 -
tlf=]
\ ldil-- so '
J-,w
a ^n-4Jv" 51.
52.
E?
'l_ s4.
I
Compressed gas cy1 i nders are not secured
The exit light at the rear door'ls-part.ialiy inoperable.
Beer kegs are obstructing the rear exit.
The egress windows behind the bar are inaccessable; thiswoul d requi re the basement to be sprl nkl ered.
These conditions have existed for over a year in some cases. Almostall of these vlolations have been brought to the attention of themanagers via vail Fire Department corriction Not.l ces. Llttle or nocompliance has been achieved, despite "promises " to correct the same.
cc : Dlck Duran6ary llurrian
Steve Patterson
John Perki ns0re HouseDr. Johns
I 1.ail. l)'
1)ir:.1-;:li'i
L;ai Icry
, Iil,.l lrii: li)i. A
lju].l d i.-rig Add it j (rn /l ir'nr)dc}
tirill: 5 I 1, lti(;
lil'; ttl; ]'J'L) li.i:i [lirjor' lrrl{iition rn([ rr{rrxl!)1, -o"f lhe exisilir};i C:iilory3ui1tlir:::.
'fl'c ic,l l,,,,inl inf,.;:'::; rtion i:;
l).:r:, r.d l.' lt':(: a fin:l ;,,,1,: t-,r,rl
A. . IllJ j l.l,li,rl li\.i i:lli.rrl-s
F.r.t,.ti
\1.-irno
0t lrcr i,'a 1l i'iaterials
Fascia.
Scffi ts
'l'iinCcr';s
Ir,I ]l (: i)\.J r r'lln
Doois
Dccr Tri rn
llanc ol lrecK .{al ls
Flues
F l5 <11 trroq
Ch ir:;ieys
T:i-a sh Ln:l osul'e s
6.1'c,l: rir ol rs es
Otirer'
B. LANDSCAPiNG
ft'ame of Designer:
Fhone :
PLANT I':ATTRIALS
Doiani cal ii= :e
.[.1c rrf i1:ri <:r'ia1
- Ballasted Fing]$- qernbrane.
Uq -t & g cle_ar y9r!-.-Sr'.
Sbucco (Sto)
r'()lor
Grave_l _-_ dark brown
Olympic scrrni-trans.
redvood #7L8
Sto #9108
y,.r1ni 1''.rl for ,i:i::', jtl.ri t',v lltc ::.1,|J i':r ri. 1o tltC Dt:'i:1il il' 1' j.,',;
c:r:i irc t; i r. t rr :
(l{atch Slifer B1dg. cqtor)
Redsood 2/12
Olyrpic sernl-transparent
.-..#Zaa
-
- -
-1S---eLe-a:r- -v€rt,--gain rdvpod . Ol5npic,sani-t rans . f,?18
__PeLla C1a4-GbL._elazeO _ _Pel1an&ita_clad. _flush 1x6 redvood Olynpic vhite solid color
_(e{t_: c-asing-)-__ _ QlyrlpiS_d7l€ serni*i_r.q4s.Pittsburgh D4642
__L{etel:_s!orp_eQ9_{s_(p4}r_2*L.8r!!stur$.l291Q-____
2| ryetql pqj:rta.r trjrn -- - --Pittsbur€h.-p2510- --
ef- - -9-1:@e-?18--.smi=trans .
O
Metal Painted Pittsburgh brt.
24 ga. ggalvarized nptal D4603
Stucco ([4atch Slifer B1dg. )
(to be presented at a later date)
N/A
Native natural stone planters to match other
Tlosn of Vail stoneqork.
Ignd- les tCns- bV- f Lfjsion -:-Glen E1 1 ison
476-3258
IRIiS PtLen R:nge1r5 . -_
Fopulous Tremlloides
!.o;4r,qn iiagg
Colorado gpruce -
Aspen
Qr_ant jly
tt
19
5-i re-
,8:1Q ft.
t-3/4" - 2-t/4" ca]r,
Ribes Alpinum
Gomus $tokrnilcrl
Ibt.cu t.i 1l a Fnx't. i<.oslr
Junilx-.rus Il, "W il tr,rni"
Alpine Cturant, .-
Bush Cintlrxrl'oil . _
Wilt.on.Iunig-'r _
2 5 g:rl
\7
I
5
5
tr1:r I .
grrl.
sQtJAi-lf .rtf ,;l_ 60_ l]. f .
400 s.f.
50D:Rluegrass Mix-SQUARE F00T.4GE _2000_F,:f . _
qFFn TVPF ar/^I]/J|sor ta eF FonTAnF
TIt!-91-^.. Idnse hihs in planter area^s
IRRIGATION
TYPE CR i.ltiH0D {a!_Lye_:ndrselpss_!&ld_elSqp,pkqqgts te be_pfeqgqtqlgly-Igd0F tROSi 0N C0iir ROL
_Cqrq5t!ir9_]vLs.?y_q4_ pg1ple_tyes: _ _ _
. C. Cii,e r l;,r', lsc;p? Fcai;rcs (r.-"-"irr'i ric r.,alis, i,:rrc?s, srii;,:,irr! f
,.,c:is, eic.) Fii;:-,c :;...-i;-v.
Erteriol_lrishting will be accomplished using concealed (in plante:s_)- incandesca.nt
"up 1ig5ht" units 15ow. lamps and conce:r1ed (in soffits) r'cce.:ssed cans at c.ntrios
to building and tlnvc lxrscxn--nt winclorvs on the north elervttion. Split pavt:rs at
bttilcling entry, lxrlorv lx:ncrh to hn 21."x7-3/4x77/4" "Ik>Iliuson lk,.d" @1or.
luwn u llal
42 we3l meadow drlve
Yatl, colorado 8'l657
(303) 476-2200
tire deparlment
M EI4O
TO
F R0f'l
RE
DATE
DICK RYAN
MIKE McGee
ORE HOUSE
3/ 23/ 83
As per your request
a " survey " of the
observati ons be'l ow.
ORE HOUSE
l.The exi ti ng i s i nadaquate due to;
a. the exit l'i ghts are out
b: itre exit si!n over the front door is not the right
nor is it lighted
c. the ttro froni exlts are too close together
;: ;;; ;i the front exits is obstructed bv the dining
e. the near exi t 'i s not marked
f. the rear exit has no steps to grade ( apx' 3'below
2. The f'l ame spread rating of the cedar paneling and cork ceilins
constitutes a serious threat to the occupants in the event of
a f.i re. 0dds are that the room wou'l d be engulfed i.n flame before
everyone could escaPe.
3. The cork ceiling does not have a fire rated backlng in some areas
4. The light fjxtures are hanglng by the wires in the dining ro0m.
5. The dup'l ex e'l ectrica'l outlets on the walls ln the dining room
need P rings.
6. The water leak from the roof beh'ind the paneling on the south
wal'l drips into the electrical outlets.
7. Inadaquate headroom at the arch at the hostess station
8. Both front doors are deadbolted
g. There 1s open wiring jn the overhang outside the front door
of 3/16/83, Gary Murrian and I conducted
0"" ilorse on thL 15th. I have listed our
s'l ze
table
the fl oor
42 wesl meadow drlve
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
ORE HOUSE
flre deparlment
-2-
10. The light fixture needs a cover to protect from physical damage
11. The gas fireplace should be made to conform to UMC stds'
12. The shutoff for the gas in the fireplace'ls lnaccessable'
13. The kitchen staff was'cooking without the filters to the
hood sYstem in Place
t4. Draft stops are needed on both sides of the kjtchen hood'
l5.Electrjcaljunctjonboxesintheentrytotheprepareadonot fit ProPerlY
16. The ma in el ectr.i cal pane'l i s not adaquatl y I abe'l ed '
L7. The entire exhaust duct shou'l d be rep'l aced.because is 'i s not
the riSht sursu-t.tii, the seams are not f iquid tight' the
cleanouts are not sealed property ald. the^termination of the
exhaust duct i;";"1';n-.ofipiiin.L with uBC, uFc, uMc or NFPA.
i8. There is open wiring above and belor the dishwasher
19. The makeup ajr duct 1s inoperative'
?0. They are still thawlng out frozen fish and meat out in the open
2I . The main electrical service is inaccessable and overloaded
22. The rear Stair tO Dr. Johns is an-open^and constitutes an open
shaft. The"f,it.i'"r'""Iitti ar.i ft6" O".Johns runs in the shaf
23. The entire rear area of the 0re House'i s not fire rated(walls o
cei 1i ng )
24. 0pen electrica'l above the walk-in cooler
?5. Very poor housekeep'ing 1n the coo'l er room
26.Therearenodrainsforthecoo.lerorfloortohandelthecondesati on.
/-
flre department42 wesl meadow drlve
Yall, colorado 8'1557
(303) 475-2200
ORE HOUSE
27. Compressed
28. They shoul
29. Instal'l a
30. Can'lights
-3-
gas cylinders are not secured
d cover and clean al'l baseboard heaters
floor sink below the prep tab'l e and djshwasher
in the cei'l ing are not tented in combustible c0nst
U PSTA I RS
31. Handrails on the stairs are mlssing'
32. There are holes in the ceiling above the exteri
33. The trash enclosure for the real estate office
fi re rated
34. The.i ce flow should be removed from the electrica'l fixtures
35. The roof overhang needs better suppont
36. tlood braclng beneath Dr.Johns kitchen exhaust vent Js jllegal
or bail conY
shoul d be
Dr. Johns
37. l.later i
38. Head cl
39. Open wi
40. Exposed
41: 0pen wi
42. Ha'in el
43. Storage
s I eaki ng out of the 'li ght f ixtures
earance is inadaquate below the dance floor'l ighting
ri ng to the dance f I oor 'l l ghti ng
broken 1 i ght b'lubs on the dance f I oor
ring at the D.J. booth
ectrical panel is not f'l ush with box and Is wlre nutted
i n the boi I er room i s Prohi bi ted
v o.
lltlluwn u
42 west meadow drlve
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 475-2200
ORE HOUSE -4-
44. The bol l er room door shou'l d have a
45. A sp,l ash guard is required betweenand open flame devices
46. The gri 1'l extends beyond the hood j
UFC, and NFPA
llre departrnenl
self closure
the deep fat fryer
n violatjon of UMC,
47 . 0ne make up a ir ventls obstructed is nissing a cover grill and the other
48. Kitchen has missing ceiljng tiles
49- The stage_ has been replaced after an appeal for increased0ccupant load was heard, and the jncreaie was granted onthe condition that the stage be removed.
50. The electrical wlring to the band equ'ipment is in violationof the Electrical Code
51. Compressed gas cyl inders are not secured
52. The exit Iight at the rear door is'partial'ly inoperable.
53. Beer kegs are obstructing the rear exjt.
54. The_egress windows behind the bar are inaccessable; this
wou'l d require the basement to be sprinklered.
Dlck Duran
Gary Murri an
Steve Patterson
These conditions have existed for over a year in some cases. Almostall bf these vJolations have been brought to the attention of themanagers via vail Fire Department correction Notlces. LJttle or nocompliance has been achieved, despite "promlses " to correct the sane.
a
HYDRO-TRIAD, LTD.
3 March, 1983
Mr. D'ick Ryan
Director of Comrunity Development
Town of Vail, City Ha11
P.0. Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81656
RE: Floodplain Analysis Ga'l'lery Building, Environmenta'l
Impact Statement
Dear l4r. Ryan:
At the request of the Town of Vail and in accordance with Zoning
Ordinance 18.69.040E, Hydro-Triad, Ltd. has prepared an "Environrnental
Impact Statement" for construction activities at the Gallery Building,
located in Vail, Colorado. A portion of the construction will takeplace w'ithin the 100-year floodplain boundary identified for Gore Creek.
Construction activities will consist of remodeling a porrtion of thebuilding and constructing protective measures to provide protection of
the build'ing against flood'ing.
A floodplain analysis has previously been performed for this site,
by Hydro-Triad, Ltd., dated May 13, 1982, Several a'lternatives were
developed to protect the bui'lding against flooding from the 100-yearflood. Each a'l ternative consisted of provid'ing a bamier against
flooding along Gore Creek for the length of the Gallery Building. Site
specific surveyed cross sections were obtained and water surfaceprofiles upstream of the Bridge Street covered bridge were ca1 cu'lated.
For a worst case scenario which consists of a vertical wal'l placed onthe Gore Creek bank, the additjonal rise in water surface elevationswill range from; a minimum of 0 feet at the Bridge Street bridge to a
maximum of 0.17 feet (2 inches) at a point 150 feet upstream oi Br.idgeStreet, Increases of these smal1 magnitudes will havi: neg'ligibleaffects on the upstream floodp'lain b6undaries
42687 WEST CEDAR DRIVE - SUITE .1OO LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80228 PHONE 303 989-,1264
Mr. Dick Ryan
3 March, 1983
Page two
Construction of a "flood barrier" wil'l not affect the drainage
basin characteristics and therefore will not increase the dischargein Gore Creek. An increase in flow veloc'i ty will likely occur for
a distance of approximately 150 feet upstream of Bridge Street. The
maximum'increase will however be slight, on the order of 0.3 feetper second which is an increase of approx'imately 4 percent.
Based on these ana'lyses, we feel that the construction activitjes,
as identified in the previous floodplain analyses, will not adverselyaffect the adjacent properties. If you have an.y questions, please
feel free to contact us at your convenience.
Si ncerely,
urce Engineer
RLH/RJN/l a
Ronald L. Halley,
Robert
Senior
Jay I
HYDf;O-TilirD, LTD.
3 March, 1983
l4r. Di ck Ryan
Director of Community Development
Tor,rn of Vail, City Hal'l
P.0. Box 100
Va i 'l , Col orado 81656
RE: Floodplain Analysis Ga1'lery Building, Environmental
Irnpact Statement
Dear l4r. Ryan:
At the request of the Town of Vail and in accordance with Zoning
Ordinance 18.69.040E, Hydro-Triad, Ltd. has prepared an "Environmental
Impact Staternent" for construction activities at the Ga'l lery Building,
located in Vail, Colorado. A portion of the construction wil'l take
place within the 100-year floodplain boundary identified for Gore Creek.
Construction actjvities will consjst of remode'l ing a portion of the
building and constructing protective measures to provide protection of
the bujlding against fiooding..
A floodplain analysis has previous'ly been performed for this site,
by Hydro-Triad, Ltd., dated llay 13, 1982. Several alternatives were
developed to protect the building against flooding from the 100-yearflood. Each alternative consisted of providing a barrier against
flooding along Gore Creek for the length of the Gal'lery Building. Site
specific surveyed cross sections were obtained and water surfaceprofiies upstream of the Bridge Street covered bridge were calculated.
For a worst case scenario which consists of a vertical wall placed on
the Gore Creek bank, the additiona1 rise 'in water surface elevatjons
wil1 range from; a minimum of 0 feet at the Bridge Street br.idge to a
maximum of 0.17 feet (Z inches) at a point 150 feet upstream of BridgeStreet. Increases of these sma11 magnitudes will have negligible
affects on the upstream f'loodplain boundarjes.
Mr. Dick Ryan
3l{arch, 1983
Page tvro
Construction of a "fIood barrier" wiI'l not affect the drainage
basin characterjstics and therefore wi'l I not increase the dischargein Gore Creek. An jncrease in flow velocity will likely occur for
a distance of approxir:iately 150 feet upstream of Bridge Street. The
niaximum increase wjll hov;ever be slight, on the order of 0.3 feetper second which js an increase of approximately 4 percent.
Based on these analyses, we feel that the construction activities,
as identified in the previous fioodplain analyses, will not adverselyaffect the adjacent properties. If you have an_y questions, please
fee'l free to contact us at your convenience
Si ncerely,
Ronald L. Ha'll
Pres i de lll"*,
Robert Jay 'ls
Senior llater Re so urce Engineer
rD> /l /rt
/,rt/z{Ury "-ey, Jr. , ,.r/
RLH/RJN/l a
o
N
N
OF
REQUEST
VAiL
oor, '4-//',f 3 JoB NAME
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
N ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION N POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL D
tr
I ^ 4^
S rmr f ELlf- ( ?O tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
Et
tr SUPPLY AIR
or{*ot
D
tr FINAL
{nppeoveo tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
*{...et4 t1:{i {)z; -. .-, t.y1 . f;'"f' ;: / t? 5: 3
cTl
TOWtl
PENS
il
I
READY FOR INSPECTI( I,-/< \
LocAtoN: *'-r').,'-i)P
t"t *to t*'* t*' 4
DATE ? - /Lt- t' V INSPECT
a
75 soulh lronlage rd.
vell, eolorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
January 4, 1983
JohnMcCoy
c/o Dr. John's
228 Bridge Street
Vai1, Colorado 8.|657
Dear John:
This letter is to inform you of the procedure that will be fol'lowed by the
Department of Cunmunity Development regarding i11ega'l signs. Starting im-
mediately, we will strictly adhere to the procedures outlined within the Vail
Municipal Code whjch state that jt is unlawful to disp'lay any sign within
the town without receiving Tovn of Vail approva'l . Violations are subject
to penalty and,/or fine, and we will begjn issuing summons for illegal signs.
In the past we have relied on a cooperative spirit in having signs that were
illeg1 removed without fjne or penalty. The proliferation of chalk boards
and temporary display boards and the repeated display of these signs by several
businesses has resulted in our decision to strictly enforce the sign code
regulat'ions. These types of signs are not al'l owed. Each restaup3nt rnd/or
bar is allowed a five square foot display box in which to post menus, current
entertainment, specials; etc. (see attached infornntion).
If you have any questions regarding exactly the type and number of signs you
are allowed, or if you would'l jke to apply to the Design Review Board for
a display box, pl ease contact me. Thank you for your cooperation,
I hope you have a happy and a prosperous New Year.
Town Planner
PJ: br
Encl .
luwn
office of the town managerbox 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-s613
January 4' l9B3
Larry Anderson, Manager
The Ore House
288 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 8.|657
Dear Mr. Anderson:
This letter is to inform you of the procedure that will be fo'l lowed by the
Department of Communjty D'evelopment.regarding i1.'lega1 slglt' Starting im-
nediately, we will strict'ly adhere to tne pi6cedur6s outTjned withjn the Vaj'l
tffii;;;;i'Code which-stite"that it is un1awful to displav.any sign within
the town without r"..iuing iourn of Vail approval. V1olations are subiect
ir-p"riity inalor tir", iia'*" *iif Uegin'issuing summons for i11ega'l signs'
In the past we have relied on a cooperative.sp'irit.]n hgyino siqns that were
illeqal removed wjthout fine or penalty. ihe'protiferation of ihalk boards -il;"ili;6iv=iirpiiv*;o;;;; ina'ir," rlpeated bisptay of these signs bv.several
busjnesses has resulied in our decjs.ion to strjctiJ enfortce the s'ign code
regulations. These types of signs.are-not allowed-' Each restaurant and/or
bar is allowed a five'!qru"" io5t aisptay Uox in which to post menus' current
entertainment, specia'l s, etc- (see attached information)'
If you have any questions fqsgrding exactly the. type and nurnber of s'igns you
ire"allowed, oi if Vou-noufa"tit. io appty to thtbesign Review Board for
u Jiipfiv box, pleaie contact me. Thahk you for your cooperation'
I hope you have a happy and a prosperous New Year'
Town Planner
PJ:br
Encl .
JOB NAME
cTl
TOW
!t
INSPE
i'.,, i lt,) t ,i.., it ;"'. ,)
N REQUEST
OF VAiL
l..- i'i'i';jDATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
CALLER 1..- ,' rl r..e;TUES ,..[-eO'..; rHUn PMFRI
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
r_1 ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
D
tr FINAL E FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
n tr
I rrrrrnr-tr FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED E REINSPECTION BEQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
'lr
oot= '2 -.-):ii -tj2* rNSpECroR
I
I
oz
t
=tulo-
c oOro
cccc\l
.n
LIJulu-
ts
=E
uJ
.eq*€e-l\ cr\
q4 RqE \ilfJ
I
+i
QL
\3
I
,l
(r
N
$
I
l_
,Ft<t6
I
I
I
I,
r9t?
IFl9z
IE
l_e,ztq
,in
utFoz
oz
6I
to
oa
ozzo
ot:(!.Y'
E EE:
:.e n€*ege.-.= Ct F
=4.=oE tsP:Ec-o>
=g.!s;
=EF;E.=_Pc96E
-*iott5;;
E E-F3
:€ 8E
gE9P
Elaeo- (5 cL-SEieotE-orsfi:€
E6:F
:EEH
ErrS
- o;9
d o'-.=.c; o s)
a' ol i.9
g5=:
5 (J >,'=
>J '. o_.O
xE=9
iE; e9Eor -Esgg
- o ds
s\)
{
Oro
Olr,
Oo
(f,
(f)
c
rJ)(r':
oo
oN
oo
o(\I
oo
c)
(\
F
LIJq
z
J
Yo
uJ't-()
z
o-
o
EFoa!
lu
z
=J
oz
-
uJ
=
IJJul
2
tr
IJJ
uJ
oE
o.o
=UJt
LU
z
6l!
Fo
ut
o-
z
UJ
C)
x
F
ulgt
CNu.lt!
s
=Etrlo-J
FoF
z
UJ
uJ
z
(o
=J
=
llt
NOtMlVA
I
': I
=9
z,-
Fit>
F!;tr
oc
*E
=s
=+uJ
$\.E
>E5;$
=6N-o-
zz
Fo- 4xrrP o
oo6boz
l!<o*x-o;()FO
z
tr
F
Aa
UJo-
OOoro
a
lu
z
E
o
z
E
t!
J
3
UJz
Itltrtlah'Z "zzYv; EFiefB
=E
g H8e39<6():)llttl||rI
:7-n5 < [?2 e=d.]<E iEsE3S3o(,or2
zI
J
fU'z
uJfJ
F
uJI
.t
(,
()
UJJ
Ltl
ooo
=
J
v,
ql
UJz
:<
iF
(f,
I
UJ
F
=<t!x-odiE
UJ
(4(\lc!
r{p
;::J
IJJ
tsg,oo-zo
F(l-
UJY
uldl
oF
ts
ccul
o.
b :rl
(L rol
_ r5lt-lH.',bkzo
"trtrtr
ts
ccul
0-
u-
E3yzE<of€aB9Eirb9'eE
)>E JF5 b=(, dtrE =*E Ubl! 5urE XO_t x>B q-
o-i!E
uttooF
-ctt
z
o9
=<d]o
=z
dP
."iE
=E=- 7\ r
aH=
F
=E
lrJ
o-zo
Fof&Fazo
CJ
(u
L
c(u
(J
{J
:z
anl-
oE
E
ui
=z
=.1(rl
uJl
1l
sl
+,
(u:z
o(n
tn
=E
I
I
I
.l
z.l
(9
HI
il
6l
zl
3l
9lt-l
I
I
I
I
el
olull
arlJI
<l>I
ttlol
zl
3lpl
FI
ol
=.1ol
uJl
5l
al>lulol
zl
aH
I
I
I
I
I
=.1olurl
1l
<l>l
ttlol
Pi e
F(J
uJ
-l_
oE
E,
-rO<F(E(JuJ<zEr,! F6ZoO
EgP
egZEfFd6 Fz
=Ft-o2
,<)
'1 9,';;9u:!Ir:.D9Ulu,;9
c <l or .Si i::lo 3 iil
?J sD c e.o
F.: $J.- rSFJciu
l:"o>q'* r,,) j: fi(l)aJSH-5!, il i:: Hi 4 o
a.: +rF.: >= )ic f t io8
r- * lrj -,: F
'.9
O"J>.Ff
-u F -a!; I*-? I c E
1-- c u BiIt()-'OOi
=9-Foii-Fqd
a ;11: Sr),li - o v
cJ ;ll o {" :o
oi6olcIo)--E'-liiEpg
:1 sr'" OObio F llo*fr'!6e'iei':-9fi5: r!; J=- o€ I;-l
..1: ;.i (|) .,, c
* ar:.9Pu)ii -c r: =g:;I]J
t (l \'iu
;-g!y-v;top:t;9-a'-;i ''! o-hii9fi,5
;i:s,i,jI
"-()({Yi:
\oN
N
Y*t
[o
i:
a;l
o
1U\) zr- /\<t rrr Y
L\ z:^ <r
:, ":..:-r. .-.\ ]
:1 \ o- L-[ \r,,
'> l<_jt_ l_ l-.1 Fl
.-: (rl'I ;11 r.r il:l -! rL!. rHl .:i .,..! rLl rrr,.::l ll.| ,i .; ., ''r ,5!. ':r 1.1t1 li t,;
!r :t .-\ !
'
i-,: r.-lv.\rr \
l\\\: llriA;J
()
a:
t-r)
{Y
F.O
l::):-t-
i)
u
::.
()
r}:,J(]
2: --.;(.)
-. aa
..t :/D- ci
t.)
tr-()
L)
,i\
3:t-
)i'
-_J{(!l
tr(-\
tii
.-J
Ll.l
rl:
..- i Q{i i-rl: i)
t_11 d
rr! !--
1,]
i..)
t!i
:I
rf
q
\
{
\
k -'lfl 3l
tE'$F | 4
l-: -Nl, I ;r(l ttl:t:.i , a{ K
-ija';<,z,
-.;F(J-;217- Lj: : o.'i - l, F-i'\uEq.-l ;: :t t2
oalQ:l:z
Z<)
7 J. *
:Yf'.r lLR:dli;Ail frE;"n>c) a: lrr ()(,) - :2 r)(J r-rj O :a.<or()5
i,l ar i.tv n I vA
>ci\ - r.\q
-: .r \'",t\(t ,. 'lB,
-1.< (\l- r\"\ ..\)
$oi- t;x:
F:lrlr ()
4>
{) iz
f- ()
_. ,i
o-
;.r
b
E
IL
LiJ
ri\
r_\ |
r*i
Sl!i
ti
\
l.|J
i"-ifo
L-
(I]
O')
7.
IL
llJ
tllo
F
h
IL
Lit
1J-
O
a-
c)
O
I
UI
fU
z.
$.*
, ':t:)
i;,"
LIJ
,"}
{;,.,
*...,
?,,,'
I L')
f:e
o
llil
75 soulh lrontage road
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
tntrn n
MEMORANDUM
TO: DICK
FROM: RUTH
RE: ORE HOUSE
Asyourequestedlhavecompi.leda.listofsjtuatjonsattheOreHousewhjchdo
not ieet the present Rules and Regulations:
1) I^lalkjn cooler,is made.of wood' 'has no cov'ing and no floor
a.uin *iinin five feet of the door'
2) Floors, walls.and cejlings of back prep area and back storage room
are made of hood
Need exhaust hood over high temperature dishwaher or convert dishwasher
io-fo* temperature chemical type'
Ce'il'ing at dishwasher needs repainting'
Interior of freestanding freezers are in disrepair'
Need a moP sink and a hand sinK'
Equipment js not 'i nstalled accordjng to spec'ifjcations listed in (w)
on page 63.
Need vegetable prep sink with an 18 inch drajnboard'
Locher and clothing change space is not prov'ided'
No running diPPer wel 1'
Using a seating capacity of 120' the facjl'ity is shortonewater
closet for the *o*"ni' ioo* ina'one.u.rinal for the men's room'
(N-8. A seating .uou.irr"ii' i)zvv"tra *;k; ii si'ort 2 urinals')
t.lal1 tjle at grill area is not light co1 ored'
Shed area is not totallY enclosed'
3)
4)
5)
6)
8)
e)
10)
11)
12)
1a\
75 south fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(3o3) 476-7000
14) Protective shielding required on
15) Insufficient light in all areas.
a'I1 1ight fjxtures.
Onl fuf. Ferkins/Architect, M&ol nun i.,, I . ons Ridge LooplF J.B,266/l1, Coto. 8165Z303-476351s
4 November 1982
llr. John J. Beaupret, president
Ore House CorporationP.O. Box 282
Sun Valley, Idaho 8ggb3
REt Vail Ore House
Dear John;
r had oecasion to walk through the restaurant yesterday withMike McGee, of the Tovrn of Vail Fire Departmeni, regard.ingour future additions and remodel work. Mr. McGee pointed-out the following problems, which he feels should be addressedimmediately. I detected a very real sense of urgency in hisattitude related to the opening of the lgg2-gg ski season.The areas of concern are as follows:
1. lYood siding lurmediately adjacent to the flame areaat the six-burner range. (I suggest application ofa tile surface eovering on the wall at least 18" awayfrom the flame area. )
Continuous fuel chain, or wood siding on the southwal1. (I suggest post application of a flane retardentspray with a listed Class A flane spread rating. Thisinstallation cost should be in the area of .EO per
square foot. )
Cork panels are sagging and eeparatlng from the ceil-inq in-the dinlng room. (I suggest repairing dry wallsubsurfaces under the cork wherever appLicable, and re-placlng cork panels.
The exlstlng extlaguishlng syetem is ln need of service.
2.
3.
4.
Sincerely,
L.r/|li" r /';.-. , 4,
John Il . Perkins , AIA
.F
5. fire exit locations do not meet code. Occupancy will be
reduced to 49 people if the exits are not brought up tocode. (Re Table 33-A and 3303(c), U.B.C.) (I suggest re-placing the exterior door in the southeast corner of thebar area.
I rej-terate the urgensy of the need to consider and rectifythese problems.
cc. Mike StaughtonI{ike McGee
Steve Patterson
Fi Ie
Utt
INSPECTION REQUEST
THUR FRI PM
TOWN OF VAIL
oor, 2-/Z- ?u- JoB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
ft,*ot
cl
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr-
tr SUPPLY AIR
"JK
tr
tr FINAL
VED O DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOB
oz
L
=G
IJJ
o-
o
o
ahL!
LutL
tr
=E
uJ
o-
.S;nsr-R p{JI
$
s
I
Jr
\^
)
' IltqIt'
Ni;
AIF
\E
r
o
IJJFoz
az
J
o
.0
ozz
I
IruJ
t?ro
I
I
I
I
I
ItE
IFl<Gl6z
r=lo
lg,zt9
-'l
1{
1
I
I
lr.
UJo
=I
ll-
Q)
()t
g
-oo
=
Ecs
o,Eo
ol
E
o
E
=l
oo
o
(u
3
.g
E
c)
(d
o
E
o
|-OJ(9<
-o
Ao!
-..E-!t
co.r().-6
9o
e6.:-
{)q,
E.e
-Ct'io
>'5
O-OEoo€oEoq#(!qr-6r(,'
P-G
o
E
oo
.2
(t
.=
E
o
(gE
Eo.
;
(5
(5
o
a5
u,
E
(l'
(Ea
o
o-
o)
o
oo(!
(6
ao
Io.
Eo
oo)
o
o
6
;
=
.g
o
tto
E(t
o.
G
.g
E6o
o
6
o
o
OtE
@
3oc.voo
()
o,
ro
F\
r.o
o?
Ol(\I
E
tr.
UJ
z
J
co
:.
UJ
I
z
.L
I
F
UJJ
uJ
oz6
=f,Jc
J
2
I
IIJ
=
!!ult!z
tr
UJ
uJ
6
to
3
uJ
tt
z
6
UJ
F
atoo-
uJo
o-
z
uJJo
x
Fr!
CD
(n
u.J
IIJt!
==(ts
uJo
J
FoF
z
o
J
(J
F
ulIul
(,z6
=J
(-)
z
-C]Itl
=
NOtM'tvA
\13
lo=lg>Glg:;;l-
Fq6E
#6 6EE
p a
=EE99 56p? Ha
sg #i(\lo
z
tr
J
o
o-
oE(,
UJc
o
tu
z
Eoo
x
z
E
UJFJ
utz
l|tl
"llll
= ^2zYYI iF5sIFEPE 5od>()()uroz<c0(Jf||lrttrl
F
LdaA n E 3l:E iE
Hf;E E9
z.
tr
tJ)z
t!
t-
llJI \
.\
oul
UJ
6
=S-
az.
UJz-
i
F
\
\)
GII
I-a
UJo
F
.tl
-JFgBir P
ul
c.o
r{r{OO
uJ
tra
coo-zo
Fc
uJ
]<
uJ6
oF
=E
uJ
o-bl> c,'.lo_ €i,O\t,_\ LrIl,, (Vrdgu,bkzo
z
o9zeoozz
=)l
o-- P
EEiA;E
ts
ul
o-
II
ul
z
oa,
oF
CEI
JFu.l :-h=-iG
o.t!>o
Ol!!ro
- lrJxo-:>fiF
JJq-
ullooF
og
IL
-9o
o
=t
.Ec5
E
EI
o.
co
E
atloIt--C-
ts
=Elrlo-zoFof,EFozoo
tr!n
I
I
3l"rJ I;lsl
sl
El
I
z
j
IL
Jdt
Fo
J
o()
(o,
+J
LJ
a,
L
E5
tir
=z
d)o")
(Ji
(Jl
=l_l
ol
UT
=4
I
I
l"
l"
I
JtttUI
H
{J>
:a(J
a
uJ
o6
=
v,
o
(U
-vqa
a
T!-la,l
=q
trl
FI
JI
al:l
ol
zl
6lFI
i
I
I
I
sl
OIl!ltrl
JI
<l>l
I!|ol
Pl e
?lol
uJl
5l
<l>lrtlq
zl
=lolFItr
tllltltlI c;lt-ltoltHlt-l
lsl
lbltzl
EFI =
tr
l,rJJq,l
F
I
I
I
I
.lot
=.1oluil
1l
sl
u-lol
zl
BI
OIFI
2
E
t.lJz
=o
F
C)llJ
=.r
(JE
E,
-rO<F(r()uJ<ztIIJ F(52o
JE<o(JF;()FS!zt18
9P
=<z.EfFr-6
6p
73
#=
=g
*.E
!JZ o()
dc>q.5trtrtr
l--
c
LU
c
alitul
LL
t-
(r
LIJ
o-
tlll
lr. INIt\l
IIn] :: (d .Y, I t!:li;el d l?d'iruF l+I ii in, 'oi l-c .gt ,o -!i * loo- Q X nr lra;6;.ia lct: :: '11 c: F ill
iffiln
:u3S<1s
tffiliilinpE '10?
rr ii 1.; g lv)'t(r1i * o u
$:o#.IJ:tI e't
;i''D'"oo$1] s RoikEis,
: k E 59
- s{ 9,*
J::O(/)c
o, ,u ;: .9 I
_q ,I ts1]J:; (J >.iTtO 4JX X q)
ibhegtH 6o 3>.:oc6Jid;iil "=,\i f 6 o.gr:6 b,? t
- {J cd i:l E
l-
')
\
,\
V)
\
((
Uq
N
\
fr
l.-
isl;\l I-\r I II trv I
t\t\
N
Iq\
}tt
I
1\.
l
F'
F
rytiia-'
=(f
J
5
G)
O
I
;l
o
,!
l--(-)
L!l
(t
co
{{
L)
{
:t:(-)
2
LUt!
o
tr.(
tx.)
6:
a
c):
iI)
g
0:
{
1rt
(l
F-
J
&
?z
'5
O
X
F
IU
U)
ita,l
ilq
ffio- ll-r ll<tlFiloll*ll
\i*
$tt;
lir'l
rP I g
{[lE(!
--J3l
9
()
-l
(t
m::)
J.t
O
:f,(J
Fl
'N
uo[vn tvA
I
I
'Ffl
F{lolol+.{.rll
a1l-l
(/llhl
9l
Eil
&l
Iol,i
8l
a0tt{
r.1l
8l
j
.ElYi
EI
I
:aEo
BZZU-ooo
F^ttz:i->(J
Er :J L] h
a(tE,Z1-L)Oott>r'jzH
lL <(9+ A.
^- .r o:>c)::
,-1 L!i(\to
>d
..\- :E n):ss
s:
z
t-
f-
r!:)oc((,
l
sl
0
\
\*-
n-
a(
;
c)i(l
C)
Iz9
c(
F
:
2
lif l-tttlIttlatt-= ,^2 vl:Y3atXd,^$!r5l;xliSoJiu.r3Ptr6()(]).(J!.)(u():z
llltlt{tttttttlrttrl
F?'{t:ina
z,lur i E?tt (.)-zv=€L
:1>Iryg:29r15u'oruoaro0rz
z
tr
I:u)
Lrl)
-
g:
l-
|-r]
:E
t
4
(J
co
>.
E
c)
rh
z
I
:cF \
"{A.
'-
\
Xlo'1 .Odict
\s
H
:"'1
r" 'J
r-J
rr'-l
r _)
, -')
Li.l
F'
U)
con
-,)
z
F-
Lt-lv
u-t
dl
F
L
(t
ut
r'r C-.1
>-:t(I .Jl
^6tX\\J OO
tlrl
lrlF-P
L,' .{
z
=7zz
o- u-
_..t-J .{
<{ (}
-r\i.r
r J .:l
m Lri :r:
ullf _l
I
cc
UJ
o-
u,o
aa
Ep
c.
0.
--1 t-
li>
o- llJ:: o-() u.Poqur
:>rtF
*J
u
ril
oF
c
AJ
E
qj
ct
tf
+:r
()
ru
lo
trf l+r"1 d;t;
L.r.j {**
f,t
*,.v
$'-
9*/n
7
L-J
,"a--\,/ , \ :a _\
i r at i-1..1I I i .+--U ilt*\ | ,f l---\r / l.i:-r-<,_.r,-/ r:_,:
Ii
CJtr
(:)
a:
tt
Lri::
':i
;;r)
I
Il.l*
I
I!./'l -rLr-'{ 'r13E
?tI.4 :><l l:
I
Il-
l"
)
g'
91:t -_
:-,1 O
f-_t-)
\',.'.
!:
C)l{d
I
"ltl("ll
:l:l
(rl
tvl
;rl
it
el
irj
|lIItllltll"l<l =l> stl'1 iiil
tJltall>lI tr-lloltzl:il ]lc] (]l
a;.1 Fl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c;l
=,|(rl
urlil
{l
;l
.!'
zl
3lpl
-E
F()
l-
Q
z
t
I
I
I
Iol
;l
Lrti
5l
3l;l
5l scl uFI F.
:j()
aa
-rO.{ F-tf. Qr-!J ..4
ul t-t,\ 7()
(J
x
i--()
0:
F.
O
J
I
CT
(-)
L'-lJ
LU
9
T(.)
o
;;, t..)
:Ti
C)(-l
(f.()
l-"()
fTt-
(i
a*)
,.r Oit fiC
irir.1t I
t .2),
(?-r
--f:
L
.4 ",t
,
a
FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS
GALLERY BUILDING
VAIL, COLORADO
May, 1982
Prepared for;
P & R ENTERPRISES
Vail, Colorado
HYDfiO.TRIAD, LTD.
12687 West Cedar Drive
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
--::fr
/),,ttkzr.
/-,4t-
(303) eee-1264
FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS
GALLIRY BTJILDING
vAIL, COL0RAD0
CONTENTS
Page
I-1I.I NTRODTICTION.
HYDROLOGY. II.1
HYORAULIC ANALYSIS .....III-i
A. Gore Creek ..III--1B. Mil l Creek. .III-3
IV. MITIGATION MEASITRES. ... IV-l
II.
III.
V.
vI.
IIIIII
IV
V
THE MINIMAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE.v-t
STIMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.. .... VI-l
TAB L ES
Comparison of Flood profiles
Effect of Retaininq l"tal I on F'l ood Profi les
F I GIIRES
Location l"lap
Channel Cross Sections, Gore Creek
Channel Cross Sections, Gore and Mill CreeksProtecti ve Measures
Protective Measures Alternati ves
HYDRO-TRIAD, LTD.
May 13, 1982
Mr. Ron Riley
Timberfa'l ls Corooration
4496 East Meadows Drive
Vai1, Co'lorado 81657
Dear Ron:
Attached is our "Floodplain Analys'i s Report for the Gallery
Building Vail, Colorado". At your request, we have made a detailed
study of the Gore Creek 100-year f'loodplain and the potential for
flooding from Mill Creek in the vicinity of the Gallery Building.
He have also examined different mitjgation measures for removing the
building from the floodplain, Our results are surrnarized below:
1. The 100-year flood flow in Gore Creek will result in a water
surface that is a maximum of approximately 0.8 foot above the
existing ground contact with the lower level building wa11of the Gallery Building. This assumes a partial blockageof Gore Creek at the Bridge Street bridge due to trash and
debris buildup. Should this b'lockage not occur, the
maximum water surface elevation wou'ld be reduced to approx-
imately 0.5 foot above the existing ground surface. The
most severe flooding will occur in the vicinity of the
stairwel'l entrance to the lower level near the northeast
corner of the building.
2. The 100-year flood flow in Mill Creek will resu'lt in a
shallow flow a'long the eastern edge of the building. Itis likely that this flow will enter the'lower'level through
the stairwell entrance at the northeast corner of the
bui lding.
3. The necessary protection can be provided by either a retaining
wall or an ed-th Ebrm. This barrier should have a maximum
elevation $f A1.7O.O)at the upstream end, resulting in a wall
or berm app-lUrinrafely 2.6 feet high at its maximum point.
This would also allow a freeboard of approximately 0.5 feet.
, Two possible locations for this barrier are shown in FigureIV. The exact location is not critical, but should be
verified with Hydro-Triad, Ltd. prior to construction.
12687 WEST CEDAR DRIVE-SUITE 4OO LAKEWOOD, COTORADO BO22B PHONE 303-989-1264
Mr. Ron Riley
May 13, 1982
Page Two
4. A means of drainage should be provided for the area
enclosed by the wall or berm. This may possibly be
accommodated by modifying the existing manhole located
north of the Ga1lery Building.
5. Should a mjnimal action alternative be taken, flood'ing in
the vicinity of the Gallery Bui'lding wi'l'l be shallow andwill result mainly in ponding in the lower level of thebuilding. It is our understanding that some inflow dueto seepage and groundwater currently exists within the .'lowerlevel and that a sump and pump system is used to removethis water. This system could be utilized to remove the
inflow from a 100-year flood event. However, it is likelythat water damage to the interior of the 'lower level willoccur. It is also possible that some structura'l damage
may occur and should be thoroughly investigated should
a minimal action alternative be taken.
lde are glad to have been of service. Please feel free to cal'lif you have any quest'ions.
Si ncerely,
TRIAD, LTD.
Ronald L. Halley, Jr.,
Pres i dent
t' l/ nt/'- J./ ',,/
t -,' /, -,//'L 't'''
Ruth Yeager
Water Resource Engineer
mk
o
FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS
GATLERY BUILDING
VAIL, COLORADO
I.I NTRODUCT I ON
The Town of Vail is located in the narrow Gore Valley, which is
part of the upper color"ado River basin. Gore creek is the major water
course f1 owing through the valley and is fed by many smaller streams
from the adjacent slopes. For reasons of aesthetics and sDace
constrictions, many buildings have been constructed alonq the banks- of
Gore creek and these trfbutari es. As a result, some of these sites
are subject to periodic f'l oodinq.
The Gallery Buildinq is located on parcel A, Block 5 of Vail
Vi11age. This site extends alonq the southern bank of Gore Creek,
from Bridge street to approximately the west branch of Mill creek, a
tributary of Gore creek (see Fioure I). According to the Gore creek
floodplain delineation, as determined by Hydro-Triad, Ltd. in lg75
(Reference 1), the 100-year floodplain boundary is located a't ong the
foundation of the Gallery Buildinq. Durinq a flood event, flooding of
the basement level may occur along with the possibility of erosion
i nduced damage.
A new addition and remodeling to the Gallery Building have been
proposed. This work is to be constructed adjacent to the existing
bui'lding and will encroach upon the 100-year f1 oodplain. Hydro-Triad,
I
- I-1 -
Bridge
Street
Bridge
Creek
q)o
(t)
Q)
OlE
a
I
I
c(ee| lrtve
GOf e ,-----
!-Cutnert for
I Mill Creek
I
I
I
N
r
No Scolc
Denotes Cross Section
Location ond Number
\-,,*.....-1' Denotes Ftow Directiut
ortheost stoirwell
entronce to
building
ffGore
G o llery
Build ing
Gorsuch
Bui lding
McBride
Buildinq
of Mill Crek
GALLERY BUILDING ADDITION
FLOODPLAIN AMLYSIS
LOCATION MAP
HYDRO -TRlAD, LT F IGURE z
MAY 1982
Ltd. has been reguested to investiqate the degree of encroachment
anticipated and to recommend al ternati ve miti gation measures. To
accomplish this, the existing floodplain has been analyzed in closer
detail with respect to the proposed addition. Based on this data,
various alternatives have been developed to protect the site from
floodinq. The effects of these protective measures on upstream con-
ditions have also been analyzed.
It is our understanding that seepaqe and groundwater inflow into
the lower level of the Gallery Building currently exists and that a
sump and pump system is used to remove thjs water. Althouqh this
constitutes a form of flooding, this report and analysis is concerned
only with surface f1 ooding and r.e'l ated protectjve measures.
The nethod of analysis used in this study is the same as for the
1975 floodplain study (Reference 1), but with more local detail.
Water surface elevations for the 100-year flood have been computed
using the HEC-2 computer model (Reference 2). This model uses energy
losses and flow characteristics between channel cross sections to pro-
duce water surface elevations. Cross section data along Gore Creek
and the west branch of Mill Creek were provided by Eagle Valley
Enqineerinq & Survey, Inc. This survey work was done in April, 1982.
The hydrology has been taken from the 1975 study performed by
Hydro-Triad, Ltd. (Reference 1).
-t-2-
I I. HYDROLOGY
The hydnology for the Gore Creek basin has been extensive1y ana-
lyzed in "Gore Creek Floodplain Information", a repont prepared by
Hydro-Triad, Ltd. in 1975 for the Colorado [,later Conservation Board
and the Town of Vail (Reference 1). This report analyzed the flood
flows generated by three sources of water - the general storm, the
thunderstorm and snowmelt.
The source of the maximum 100-year flood varies according to the
location and size of the drainaqe basin. For the design point of this
study, Gore Creek at Bridqe Street, the cumulative drainage basin is
approximately 66.5 square miles and the 100-year flood peak flow in
Gore Creek is 2,380 cfs. This flood is caused by snowrnelt. For the
analyses in this study, this peak flow was used.
For the west branch of Mill Creek above its confluence with Gore
Creek, the drainage area is approximately 7.56 square miles. The
maximum peak flow is caused by the thunderstorm. For the 100-year
thunderstorm, the 60-minute storm has a cumulative rainfall of 1.50
inches, of which only 0.?2 inches becomes runoff (see Reference 3).
For a time of concentration of 90 minutes, this results in a peak
runoff of approximately 800 cfs. This flow rate is conservatively
high since it is likety at this altitude that some of the precipita-
tion wil'l fall as hail or snow. In this case, the time of con-
centration will be lengthened considerably and the flood peak will be
correspondingly reduced.
- II-t -
o
thunderstorm occur
sma11, the flooding
can be treated as
Sjnce the probability of having the 100-year
at the time of peak snowmelt runoff is extremely
of Gore Creek and the west branch of Mi I I Creek
separate events.
- II-2 -
o
-ll
rjql
o
l-(r)
$o
\q
E
o$
6
E$i ts
S; E;
fi$ui;E
ssFesS I
I
K
"#
(
\
\
-:E \
st
isr
qj rr;
F*o
=
o.$
a.
(ao
Ur
o
q)sq
Es
0)o
I
\*l:lr
I
gHl-
I
1i
\c
\/
\i
w
r-{
st $ig -.1gi 'i{r
hJA
*()
s
oo|E
a
E
egso
RR
rri rri
38
tt tl..t -.1t{ l{J(/) CD!!
\r
t(\
v\\\\
e
trtto
6t
-Jtl.t(aI
\t
=o
R()
trjl
arrl
;t(r,ot$
(o
td
tf)
a
1l
\;t{
gl
€
5a
Io
a(D
a
.\
o
rO
6
o(o
CO
og
@
oI
@
o(ooF-
@
\
\
\
\
Irlq5(D
tr
cil-
aq
tt-
Io
aca
\
133 J Nt N0|1VA3''13I33J Nl N0tIvA3''13
ssfiu
E:H*til"s
\F*[3 Go,
isis
;$u Fts
s$$e 8S
I
$J
g
HFl
t{t5(t
\
.s
o
sf
s
aorSsi
Ni t'i
o
-ll
.tr}***"-
t
5(,
I rr)
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
Ot.sc
s
BF
'-\
*sE
o$$-.(ci(o
l/D lO
6Slt a!
o
tl
itt
bo
cr)
Eslo
(r)
5o
s.s{coo
co
$(u
(t)
$(,)
o
$
N
to
$u(r)
Eot$
I
N
R
I
k
K
II
..)l
Fl *
Hl 6*l
=8l R
$l *Y
I
Il'
I
(\t
i(o
a
ll
i
t{J
Or.\\.\
*-Qa.€!()ll)steoaQO
(
-t
K,
fi
I
(0
tri
tc)
s
h
i
l1.1
Frt
f,a.
b1
..-- S
s3
LJ t{qu)l=
C\tbo
\<{
=
olo
o
os
@
@
@
F
@
|r)
@
(o
@
a
{
aq
q
I
ctI}\,
\
kt{
\|q
$
li
lE-t\
ISlotq
IF
I
l3
tro
UJ(/)
(
I
b
R
N
I
trf\o
A=o:a\ts
o\u
CL\
133J Nt N0tlv^3''13133J Nt N0t1vA3-t3
F
I I I . HYDRAIIL IC ANAL YSES
l Gore Creek
The Gor"e Creek channel in the vicinity of the Gallery Bujld'inq is
approximatel.y 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep. Large r^ocks lininq the
invert and sides throuqh this reach result in a hiqh channel rouqhness
correspondinq to a Manninqs "n" of about 0.07. There are two features
in this reach that contribute to hiqher flood water adjacent to the
Ga1'l ery Buildind. The first is the covered footbri dge at Bridge
Street, which forms a constriction at higher flows. The second is the
presence of several larqe boulders located about 20 feet upstream from
the bridge. These boulders cause a constriction even at low f'l ows and
are conducive to trash and debris collection.
The HEC-2 backwater analysis of this reach is based upon six
cross sections taken along Gore Creek (see Figures I, ll and III).
Cross sections l and 2 (Station 0-68.2 and Station 0-33.3) are typical
of the channel downstream from Bridqe Street. Cross section 3
(Station 0+00) is just upstream from the Bridqe Street bridge and
shows the low chord of the bridqe and the invert of a gas pipeline
under it. Cross section 4 (Station 0+23.1) shows the major boulders
within the channe'l and cross section 5 (station 0+61.3) includes the
upstream end of the Gal I ery Bui ldinq. Cross section 6 (Station
1+49.3) is upstream from the west branch of Mill creek confluence and
is much wider and shallower than the sections downstreain. cross sec-
- III-1 -
tion 7 is located on the west branch of Mill Creek, just upstream of
its confluence with Gore Creek.
The water surface from Station 0-68.2 to Station l+49.3 was
calculated by the HEC-Z computer model. In addition to the cross sec-
tjonal data, the model also requires the flow rate, Mannings unu
values and startinq water surface elevation. A peak flow rate of
2,380 cfs was used and a roughness coefficient value of 0.07 was used
for the channel except for a 10-foot reach near the boulders (Station
0+23.1), where 0.08 was used. For the overbanks, a value of.0.05 das
used. These values are based upon the physical appearance of the
channel and are similar to those of the prev.ious study.
For the HEC-Z model , the starting water surface elevation was
determined to be 8155.5 feet. This is based upon the flood profi'l e
el evations from the 1975 study (Reference 1) for cross sqction 1,
Station 0-68.2. However, comparison of the cross sections at the
bridqe and the channel invert indicates that there is a difference in
datum between the survey of 1975 and the present survey for this
report. (The absence of u.S.G.s. bench marks in this area nrakes this
a likely occurrence.) The difference in datum elevation is approxima-
tely 1.5 feet. This difference is based on the invert or Iow chord
elevations given'in each survey for the l-beam of the bridge. As a
result, the beginning water surface elevation of 8155.5 has been
lowered to 8154.0.
- trt-? -
The backwater analyses for the sections used in the present sur-
vey resulted in a lower water surface profi'l e than given in the 1975
study. This is shown in Table 1. One reason for this difference is
that the 1982 survey data is much more detailed than the earlier 1975
survey and reflects local ized channel characteristics. Al so, the
earl ier study assumed some b1 ockage at the boulders due to trash.
l,'lhen the cross sectional area of cross section 4, Station 0+23.1, was
reduced to simulate trash blockage (see Figure II), the water surface
profiles matched more closely. This partial blockage was assumed for
the remainder of the analysis as a worst case condition.
Comparison of the water surface elevations with the ground eleva-
tion at the foundation wall of the Gallery Buildinq indicates that the
upstream end of the building could be flooded. The water depth at
this point would be approximately 0.8 feet, which would result in
shallow flooding alono the entire north side of the property (see
Fiqure I ).
B.Mi I I Creek
The west branch of Mill Creek channel has a capacity of approxi-
mately 500 cfs at a point 70 feet upstream from its confluence with
Gore Creek, cross section 7 (see Figure III). Although the peak fl ow
for Mil'l creek has been estimated at 800 cfs, upstream conditions pre-
vent this full peak fnom reaching the confluence. There is a $truc-
ture on llill creek upstrern that is designed to diver.t at least 50
- III.3 .
TABI. E I
Comrrari son of Fl ood Profi I es(ffi)
* These elevations have been adjusted downward 1.5 feet in orderto account for the datum differences. The stations do not match
exactly with those of the 1982 survey.
Cross Sect.ion 1975
Stud.y*
19BZ Surve.y Existinq Ground
El evation at Gal I ery
Bui'l dinq FoundationAs Shown
hli t h Blockaqe
BouldersAto.Stat i on
I
2
J
4
5
6
0-68.?
0-33.3
0+00
0+23. I
0+61.3
1+49. 3
54. 00
54. 50
57. l0
54. 00
54.60
55.15
55.33
56.07
57.05
54.00
54.60
55. 15
55.29
56.40
57.19
58.00
55. 60
55.60
I
I
I
N
percent of the f1 ow away from the west branch of Mi'l I Creek. A1 so,
even if this diversion becomes blocked, flow-splitting will probably
occur at culverts located at Gore Street Road and Hanson Ranch Road,
Despite the reduction in flow in the west branch of Mill Creek,
the potential of flooding from this creek still exists. The potential
for flooding of the Galiery Building site from Mill Creek is not
caused by a lack of channel capacity, but is rather the result of the
limited capacity of the culvert under Gore Creek Drive upstream of the
Gallery Building (Figure -I). This cu'l vert appears to have a diameter
of 36 inches or less, and will carry less than 100 cfs. The rema'inder
of the flow wil'l overtoo Gore Creek Drive. Some of the flow will be
diverted west on the road, while a portion of the remaining flow will
cross the road, flowing on the overbanks and back into the channel .
Althouqh most of the overbank flow will return to the channel , a small
amount of it will flow overland toward the Gallery Building. This
flow will be less than 0.5 feet in depth and will have a 1ow ve1 ocity.
If not controlled or rerouted, this flow may result in considerable
pondino on the east side of the Gallery Building and may enter the
lower level of the building via the stairwell entrance'located at the
northeast corner of the buildinq.
.III-4 -
IV. MITIGATION MEASURES
There are three major ways to protect the property from rr.fu."
floodinq. The first is to lower the flood profile, either through
general channel inrprovement or by removal of specific constrictions.
This method is not desirable'in the case of the Gallery Buildinq,
since the constrictions of the footbridge and the upstream boulders
are visual amenities. The other two methods, which witl be discussed
below, involve protectino the property by a wal'l or berm, or regradinq
it so that it 'l ies above the flood water surface.
The desired protection can be produced by a variety of retaining
walls or berm designs (Figures IV and V). The major qualification is
that the minimum elevations sugqested in Table 2 be met. These eleva-
tions are based on the water surface elevations obtained from .the
HEC-2 analyses pl us a minimum freeboard of 0.5 feet. Depending upon
the location of the wall or berm with respect to the Gallery Buildino,
the maximum heiqht will be either 2.6 feet or 1.5 feet (Figures IV and
V) , as based on the exi sti nq ground surface. From approximate'ly
station 0+40 to station 0+00, the wall height may be tapered from the
maximum to the existing ground level . Final selection of a design
will be based mainly on appearances and space considerations. A brief
description of each retaining wa11 and/or berm design is presented
bel ow.
- IV-l -
TABLE 2
Protective Measure Elevations and
Effects on Flood Profile
* Allows for approximately 0.5 feet of freeboard.
Cross Section Existinq
(l"Jith Blockaqe)
Retaininq }Jall
(l"|ith Bl ockaqe)
Suqqested r'l n.
Elevation for
Retaininq Wall*Stat i on
?
4
5
6
0+00
0+23. I
0+61.3
1+49.3
55.15
55.29
56 .40
57.19
55.15
55.26
56.42
57.36
56.00
s6:50
57.00
HYDRO -TRIAD, LT1 FIGURE
MAY 1982
1.A 6-inch wide retaining wall of reinforced concrete
construction can provide the necessary protection in the
least amount of space. It can be architecturally finished in
order to blend in with the building and grounds. Two
possible placements of this wal I are shown in Figure IV,
conceptual desiqns is shown on Fiqure V,
An alternatjve solutjon wou'l d be a timber retaining wa'l l.
The timber would be exposed on one side and would be sup-
ported by compacted earthfill and anchors on the other. The
earthfill can be planted with grass and concealed by bushes
or trees. The plan shown in Figure IV is sujtable for the
timber wall as well as the concrete one. Conceptual designs
of this alternative are also shown on Fiqure V.
A compacted earth berm could be used instead of a .retaining
wall. This option reguires more space than a retaining wall
but will be less conspicuous. A berm with a 2-foot crest
width and 1:1 side slopes could be used. If a qentler grade
is used for the side slopes, the benn will require addi-
tional area but will look more natura'| . It can be covered
wih grass or bushes. A conceptual desiqn of this alter-
native is shown on Figure V.
A fourth option would be to reqrade the property to raise it
above the high water level . The major drawback with this
2.
4.
- IV-2 -
o
option js that the upstream end of the Gallery Buildinq is
below the necessary elevation so the reqrading must match
the existing qround at the edqe of the bui ldinq. This
option may be considered to be an extremely wide variation
on the earthen berm, Alternative 3, and will not be con-
sidered further.
For all of the options described above, some provision must be
made for the drainage of the area between the Gallery Building and
Gore creek. One alternative that should be examined is the feasi6i-
lity of usinq the abandoned manhole (see Figure IV) for localized
drainage. If the final configuration of the berm or retafning wall
places the manhole between the Gallery Buuidinq and the berm, the
manhole cover may be replaced with a drainage grate thereby produc.ing
an area drain. similarly, if the rnanhole is located north of the berm
or retaining wall, an area drain could be constructed and pipe
attached to connect it to the manhole. Alternatively, drainage pipes
could be constructed in the wall or berm. These would have to have
flap valves on them to prevent flooding during high creek flows.
In developino protection measures for ftooding from the west
branch of Mill creek, it is recommended that the rear entranceway
stairwell to the Ore House Restaurant, at the northeast corner of the
building, be modified so that the steps down qo from west to east
rather than the present east to west configuration. A wall or berm
could be constructed from the northeast corner of the building and
- IV-3 -
n
n
tied into the protective measure along Gore Creek. A 1.5-foot high
curb, berm or swale will provide sufficient protection against
floodinq (based on the existing ground surface). This curb or berm
should be continuous with the improvements along Gore creek and should
be positioned such that the overbank flow from Mill Creek is deflected
into Gore Creek or back into Mill Creek. One possible desfqn is shown
on Fiqure lV.
Before a flood protection measure js chosen, it should be
recogn'ized that the placement of such a measure would be located orJt-
side of the Gallery Buildinc property line. It js our understan{ing
that the'l and alonq Gore Creek, north of the Galler.y Building, is
owned by the Town of Vail. As such, some form of approval for the
protection measures ma,y be needed from the town.
Placement of any of the above described protection measu.res would
affect the water surface e'l evations of Gore creek, both at the Gallery
Buildinq and upstream of it. The worst case condition would occur if
a vertical wall were placed at the top of the bank immediately adja-
cent to Gore Creek. To analyze this condition, the ex.i sting cross
sections were altered to conform to this condition. A berm or a wall
further frorn the creek wou'l d have less effect on the water surface
level . Table 2 shows that such a wall will have no noticeable effect
on the water surface upstream of the Gallery Building. At Station
1.+49.3, the rise is only 0.17 feet, so the upstream effects of these
improvements can be assumed to be neqligjble.
- IV-4 -
E
i$$*i
iss$i
J-$
be-q)'i- oeico
ssH
Et:
i$nE\T.P"gi Erl
F$l
o
o
1A\{,
-\'66=R
.Q R,
9c
*.s:3i:
.sltsc
'i3
oe
a
5a
\q
r{l
-Jl
-Jlql
(Dl
el
o
I
C\rs
o)
\q
E
}-
E$<{
aq
-l{
s
q
trJ
al
EI
|\I
s
trq
=
F..llql
{
Itloo>a
bs
c*€it
I
I
sa\q
FI
t{q5$
\
ilog
6up1ng ,(te11og
I *g-,1
s*
gE,
3Eacsbul'S*sS8.;l
6wp11ng tuqtog
,,9-,1
$E
iE
Ss\d
8
(a
o
9*ra (J
-Jt
o\
a\e'aqao
rll
v
o\o-\
o\tlI
t
I
I
I
I
oq)
q
-l<
b
o.
o
o
>ol-.
I
I
I
I
I
E
l{J
s
trlqo$
oL
L
=l{
L)
slalql
s
(t
=
=q
t{
"l-l
t{l>l
5lql
HIil
)qr,
t
.Fiee
,iR
aca
a.t)
s
o
t{J
t
o
a.
s
co
oo
o
bl.=
o(l)q
oco
o
3
\(bl:-tq)
(Jc.a(J
bq)o
o
q
(l'q
(o
€
o!J
lrl
'Pbh{
,$
lsr!
.?t!o!
I
I
I
I
I
oq)
q
t
o
a.
a
o
c!f
I
I
I
I
J
I
oq
.a
I
q
ot{l
ul-,?
=fra
Ftq
trt
s
q
=iql
N]
-.liql
gi
l{tI
(D
o|-]
l-
E$q
>lalql
trtua
\
l-
\J
=htl-l
$l
HI
=tl
t(
t
o
ECioosi,it
rysrc eJog
.l(
aa.
s
o
ial*.
.o
o€$cI
t
ot
q
q
s
o{
(a
opi.= eJ
-.J\
I
I
I\:r
rsl
il
-l
il
3l
il
-*ltr)
.'t$
.l
.}l
\l
ol
\q)
(J
a
ot
I(o
.ll
k)
I(0
I
qJ
lEer? oro geJogleergleerg erog
All of the berm and retaining wall desjgns described above will
protect the Gallery Buildinq from the peak flow of the 100-year flood.
The hydraulic analysis included in this report should be sufficient
for the Town of Vail and the Colorado Water Conservation Board. Due
to an extremely conservati ve interin pol icy, the Federal Emercency
Management Agency (FtMA) will presently not accept these designs as
the basis for floodplain map revision.
- IV-s -
v.THE MINIMAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The mitiqation measures described in Section IV protect the
Gallery Bui ldinq by routing the floodwater around the buildinq.
Another alternative, the minimal action alternative, is to leave the
buildinq within the floodplain, but to ensure that the flooding will
not cause undue damaqe. The floodinq adjacent to the Gallery
Buildinq, even under conservative assumptions will be shallow, Iow
velocit.y and of short duration. It may prove to be cost effective to
leave the buildinq within the floodplain provided the followinq con-
ditions are met:
1. A structural or foundation anal.ysis to show that temporar.y
inundat'ion will not cause structural damaqe.
sump and pump system, existing or upgraded, can handle
increased inflow occurrinq durinq the f'l oodinq.
All openinqs which could permit free passase of water to the
I ower level must he ahove the maximum water surface.
4. Flood insurance rates must not be siqnificantly hiqher than
for the other alternatives.
The critica'l sectjon of the Gal'l ery Bui'l dinq in the event of
f'loodinq will be the rear stairwell entrance of the northeast corner
of the building. During the peak of the flood, the stairwe'l I will
function as a broad-crested weir, allowinq as much as 15 cubic feet of
2. The
the
-v-l -
water per second to enter the lower level . Even if the sump and pump
system can handle this flow in addition to a rnuch higher than normal
seepaqe rate, the temporary presence of water may damage the interior
contents or cause structural danaqe. It is, therefore, advisable that
the stairwell be protected by a 1.5 foot hiqh barrier (based on
existing ground surface). This barrier could consist of an extra step
at the top of the stairs which would be connected with a barrier
around the railinq. This arrangement would protect the stairwell not
only from the 100-year event, hut also from 'localized runoff. The
barrier around the stairwell is the minimal protection necessary for
the bui Idinq.
-u-2-
7
I
VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLI'SIONS
The Gallery Buildinq, located alonq Gore creek in vail, colorado,
is sub.iect to inundation by the 100-year flood. Detailed analysis- of
the flood profile indicates that the high water level at the upstream
end of the buildinq will be at elevation g156.40, about 0.g feet above
the existins qr^ound level of the foundation of the buildinq. The
building can also be affected by floodinq from Mill creek, a tributary
of Gore Creek.
Conceptual designs for
detail in Part IV, and shown
have a mininal effect on the
Gallery Bui'ldinq.
ttre use of
utilizing these r€asures are discussed in
on Figures IV and V. These measures wil'l
flood profile along and upstream from the
The Gallery fuildinq can be protected from flooding
one of the followinq mitiqation measures:
1. A concrete reta i ni nq wa I I .?. A timber retaininq wall.3. A berm.4. Regrading.
by
An alternative measure would be to limit flood protection to the
stainwell of the Ore House Restaurant. This alternative is viable if
structural analys'is indicates that shal tow, temporary floodinq will
not cause structural damaqe.
l'
REFERENCES
tI.
2,
"Gore Creek Floodplain Information,,, Hydro-Triad, Ltd., 1975.
"HEC-Z !,later Surface Profiles,,, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers,Hydrolooic Engineerino Center, 1976.
."Gore Creek Floodplain Hydrolooy Report, Technical Addendum,,,Hydro-Triad, Ltd., 1975.
?
,^Or lr
,HYDiiO-TfiIAD. LTD.
3 March, 1983
Mr. Dick Ryan
Director of Cor'rmun ity Deve'lopment
Tovrn of Vail, City Ha11
P.0. Box 100
Vai'1, Colorado 81656
RE: F'toodp'lain Analysis Gallery Bui'lding, Environmenta'l
ImPact Statenent
Dear Mr. Ryan:
At the request of the Town of Vail and in accordance with Zoning
Ordjnance 18.69.040E, Hydro-Triad, Ltd. has prepared an "Environnrenta'l
Imnact Statenrent" for constructjon activities at the Galiery Building'
located in Vail, Colorado. A portion of the construct'ion tr'ill take
place within the 100-year f'loodplain boundary identified for Gore Creek.
Construction activities will consist of remodel'ing a portion of the
building and constructing protective measures to provide protection of
the building against flooding.
A floodplain analysis has previously been performed for this site'
by Hydro-Triad, Ltd., dated llay 13, 1982. Several alternatives were
developed to protect the building against flooding from the i0O-year
flood. Each alternative consisted of providjng a barrier against
fiooding along Gore Creek for the length of the Gallery Building. Site
specific surveyed cross sections were obtained and water surface
profi'les upstream of the Bridge Street covered bridge were calculated.
For a worst case scenario which consists of a vertical wali placed on
the Gore Creek bank, the additional rise in water surface elevations
wii'l range from; a minimum of 0 feet at the Bridge Street bridge to a
max'imum of 0-17 feet (2 inches) at a point 150 feet upstream of Bridge
Street. Increases of these small magnitudes wil'l have negligib'le
affects on the upstream f1 oodplain boundaries.
lr lr
l4r. Dick Ryan
3 l'iarch, 1983
Page two
Construction of a "flood barrjer" wil'l not affect the drainage
basin characteristics and therefore rvill not incredse the dischargein Gore Creek. An increase in flow velocity will l.i kely occur for
a distance of approximately 150 feet upstream of Bridge Street. The
maxinum increase will hor,rever be slight, on the order of 0.3 feetper second which is an increase of approximately 4 percent.
Based on these anaiyses, we feei that the construction activities,
as identified in the previous floodpla'i n analyses, will not adverselyaffect the adjacent properties. If you have an.y questions, pleasefeel free to contact us at your convenience
S'i ncere'ly,
Robert
Senior
Jay t5
l,la ter Reso urce Engineer
RLH/RJN/l a
lnlvn
75 south lronlage .d.
Yall. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7ooo
!4arch 9, 1982
l,lr. Ron Riley
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Ron:
The Planning and Environnental Comrnission
major upgrading of the Gallery Buildi.ng.final Design Revi.ew Board approval . Then
department of community development
Re: Gallery Building
has approved plans for the
The next step is to obtain
upon proper application, a
Sinc
Tor.'m Planner
PJ:br
lolryn
75 eoulh f ronlage rd.
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
March 3, l9B2
Mr. Ron Rjley
228 Brjdge Street
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Re; GallerY Building
Dear Ron:
The Plannjng and Environmental Commission has approved p1 ans for
major upgrading of the Gallery Buiiding upon receiv'ing Design
Review Board approval. The next step would be application for a
building permit. After meeting the building department require-
ments, a permit will be issued,
DICK RYAN
Cornmunity Devel opment Department
DR: bpr
Project Application
Project Name: 4"AlJ*EA>t &1vO /4 b
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
2.or:\ tt-E"t
Architect, Address and Phone:
/Aau:r-A
BlockLegal Description: Lot Filing Zone
Comments:
fraEt-t/'t/4 44 Design Review Board tl
'"" 3/ s/s2-
Motion by:
Seconded by:triz\^J1i\
DISAPPROVAL
$- <>
r APPROVAL I
-r
Su mmary:
€EALrl|S ; E *rtr>tot2- tt6erln)u, e*Te rztorz oa
0,\AqSTEA | '|F-EE< tN aL4frF - ; TvlLkl ilJ
Lt9 IA f- OF 4VE2J
HE1697 of- Atrtatrl t*lV wA.L S A N4HL ott ,aoui H/4rf"4!41-NLLD nA7 Eut4L-9 &Aa',a
E statt Approval
lul'ln
75 south lrontage rd.
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
March 3, 1982
Mr. Ron R'il ey
228 Bridge Street
Va'i1 , Col orado 81 657
Re: Gallery Building
uear Kon:
The Planning and Environmental Commissjon has approved p1 ans for
major upgrading of the Gai. lery Building upon receiv ing Design
Review Board approval . The next step would be applicatjon for a
building permit, After meeting the bujld'i ng department require-
ments, a permit will be issued.
Sjncerely,
Conmunity Devel opment Department
DR : bpr
DlCK RYAN
i'"' |
"o'n''uo
. LIST OF TIAT]
t
NAIIE OF IIROJXCT +nnrnrnu ar,rn nnunnw
3 March 1982
OF PROJI';CT' Major renovation addition and remodel of
the Gallery Building
LEGAL DESCRIIITI9.I Lot A, PXffiion of triggfqrP Vail Villase First I'ILING
DESCIIIPTIOI'I
The frrl"lorvj.ng infcrrnat ion
i,0 thc Desigti Re.viel Board
.{. ) EttI LDINc l'lATilll I ALS r
Roof
Sicllng
Other lfal] l'!alcri.als
Iaseirr
Soffits
Vilndows
I9indow Trim
l)oors
Door Trim
lland or Deck Rails
l'l rres
Flashi ngs
Chinneys
Tr:rsh Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.)PLANT MATERIALS
Picea PrLn g6 nqs
Pnprr'l rrs TtemUJ:O jdeg
Acer Gi nnaAa.
Qgr.nqF.-SLo lon i f e r: a
Pqtentilla FructicosaJuniperus SabinaTainaris-Cifolia
is rcquirecl fol suLmittirl by thc Applicant
bef ore a f 1na1 .rl)pr()val c:nn be 6ivcn.
Tyne of !!gterial Color
Era.vel /iruilo,ro . - "t"r' , (? L4il)*
Botanical Nsme Conunon llame
,ro.r,rr.,.,rr - ,tatrrtal I{X \*n{r\
stucco/sto white
cedar st ained
exterio-r--Blvwood stained -
-*double hung - yhite clad
redwood natural
gla.zed store doors
redwood
ryi A
---_.metal painted
met a.1 painted
stucco /sto
redqrood natural
N/A
lricludtng Trees, Shrubs,(Vegetative, Landscapint Materialsand Ground Cover)
Srsi-qi-tx Size
G1ieon SFrLln p
a
AsPo.t
Amrrr llTp.p_l.e
Red Twig
Dogwood*. _Gold Drop
Po!ent i1_Ia
Tam Jirniper
R
I.ra--...'-_-
(f
Ib
8t- .
'l rf _l arr
Z-aaL..
! g?1-:
-L-c?1:
5 ga1 .10
l| .. - |
o
Page
t
I
I
bt.r,
I
llaterlals Contlnued
Dotanical Name Cormnon Name qsselllr S lze
c.)i'
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES(Retaining 1,1a11s, Fences, Swlnrning Pools, etc.)
1,
(Pleaee:specffy)
r."'
.t-
Dan Corcoran
,lim Vie'le
Diana Donovan
Jim Morgan
I,ilil l Trout
(1 ater)
Scott Edwards
ABSENT
Du-ane Piper
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMM]SSION
February zZ 1982
PRESENT STAFF
Dick Ryan
Peter Patten
Peter Jamar
Jim Sayre
Betsy Rosolack
COUNCIL REP
Gail Wahrl ich
Dan Corcoran, vice-chairman, called the meetinq to order at 2:.l0.
l. Election of chairman and vice-chairman.
Diane moved and Jim M seconded to nominate Dan for chajrman. The vote was 4-0,
Dan abstaining. Dan moved and Jim M seconded to nominate Duane as vjce-chairmin.The vote was 5-0 in favor.
2. Approval of mjnutes of meeting of February 8, .l982.
lr|ill moved and Jim M seconded to approve the minrrtes of February 8. The vote
was 4-0, Jim V abstaining.
3. Request to amend zoning code to add new district called Arterial Busjness.
(Scott arrjved)
Dick Ryan exap'lained the memo and explained that the staff recommended that theVail Associates'west day parking loi not be included jn the rezoned'l and becauseof their reluctance to assure the Town that the area would remain parking.
Dick added that the staff did not inclrrde lodge rooms in the new zone district *
because the parcels were so small, and that oniy one site, VA service yard, wai lurge
enough to be considered possibte lodging. Dick went on to exptain thi diiferencesbetween this memo and thb previous oie.'
Steve Isom if I-plan, Inc., expressed concern over the addition of the sentence,"Surface parking shall be limited to 25% of site area.',
steve a'l so objected to the requirement of a pitch on the roofs of s/12, statingthat it severely restricted Udilaings to two storjes.
Diane expressed the concern that the area remain vehicular and for servicesnot ava'ilable elsewhere for residents. She was also concerned that there be
enough parking, as she felt there was not enough parking in town.
,a,o
Dick explained that the uses I isted were geared
uses rather than gift shops, and that there wasto be in the Texaco site.
PEC -2- 2/8/82
to more community-w'ide
a possible offjce building
The surface parking restriction was debated as vlas the requirement of the5/.|2 pitch and the fact that no lodges would be permitted. Dick then suggestedthat the surface parking restrictjon be removed.
The members were poiled about their feelings on the jssues. |.lill was infavor of a 3/12 pitch, 'l eaving the lodges 'in permitted uses, and strikingthe surface parking sentence. Dan had-no problem with 3/l 2 pitch,
Diane did not feel 'l odges should be fn that zone, and did not want too much'leeway for parking, scott felt the 3/12 roof was alright, and would liketo see the code allow certain parts of the bui'l d'ing hive flat roofs, andwanted to.see the_parking-restriction remain, and was in favor of strikingthe west day park'ing'lot from the djstrict. Diane added the concern that ihearea would.be upzoned so much, they wouldn't be able to put in the thingsneeded. Djck countered with the fact that now with the ileavy Service District,
one could come in and get an office building with more density.
Jim,added that perhaps they were forcing this the other way by requiring lessparKlng on tne surface, many businesses couldn't afford to come into the district.
Jim V' asked 'if it were truly down zoned, and Dick explained that jt was reducingbulk and increasing open land which was down zoning, and increasing the trses,which was up zonin!.
lJill moved and Scott seconded to approve the recommendation to amend the zoningcode as stated in the staff memo aitea z/17/92 with the fol10wing changes:a. A minimum pitch of 3/jZ be allowed on roofsb. Lodges be left as conditonal usec. Strike the 25% surface parking requirementd. Strike the west day lot from the total areae. Add convenience stores or grocery srores
The vote was 3-l in favor. Diane voted against the issue, because she feltthe 25% parking restriction should remain. Jim v and Jim M. abstained.
4. Request to amend Section .l8.54 Design Revjew Gujdelines
Peter Jamar explained that this was a recorrnendation to be made lo Council .After discussion, it was decided to remove Section .l8.54.085 for further stu-dy.
Diane moved and Jim M seconded to reconrnend to Council the revisions to thedesign review section of the zoning code with the exception of section'l 8.54.085.The vote was 6-0 in favor.
.J-O ? PEC -3- 2/a/Bzs trffi*#etF"
Jim Sayre explained-that this was the third time th'is subject had come before theboard' The first.time.there wis-no"iuoienc-e-participation, the second time therewas objection to the ticensingl-ro-ni, fi," iii"rii;gGri had been dropped. Hefurther explajned that the-sp"i.iii ij.u"ropment nirliiiii had been added ro thedistricts allowing arcades' .niir. siit<uauLr ait.i-.nori whether or not a spaceunder the Gondo'ra steps wourd be eiiiuaed fr;; h;v;;;-in''arcade in jr and wastotd that it woutd noi o"-iti"r"o"ir';il; iolitionl", .,'
The Planning commission ferb that it was not.necessary to.incrude any wordingthat related to establishments thai"served .l iquor,-ii.n..-rn"re were regulatedunder liquor 'licensing. s;;i; *ouua'una .:tm I'i seiono.i'to approve Lhe reconunendedi3ii:il::rr to the coae per-in;;;;; memo or z/jttsz-iiul tn" a"rinitions as
1.1., .18.04.252 l"|ajor Arcade"Major arcade".-shitt mean-a place of business where an individual , association,partnership or corporation ma;niains more ilun ir,.""'amusement devices.l.c. .t8.04.254
Minor Arcade
"Minor arcade".-shall bean a place of business where an individual , association,partnersh'ip or corporati on maintai ns t esi-ihan ioJ"-urrrement devices.
In Commerciar cores l gn{ r{, add.to paragraphs 1g.24-020 c, rg.24.080 E andi?;33;?'l.ii#':;"il:ii j;jj:r;-;rrJir'not-ne vrs inie i"o,, unv publ ic way,
The vote was 6-0 unanimousiy in favor of the amendments.
6.88
Peter Patten exprained the memo and added that the neighboring building, theslifer building, would be-tr.ii"a"it-u'separate issue, but was related as to3i.:il';rl;itl!;*. He expiainea -i[.-""i.o.;-i;;-";;;*Jnjin"g
the er im.inatjon
John Perkins representjnq ngn.Riley showed erevations and explained why he hadnoped to have the n9l^th 9:.k.to heip-ihe aesign or-the-nJrih etevation. He addedthat the appiicant T: igt strong-oi
"utuinind tne Jeit.- He snoweo srides andphotographs indicating the view ioiriao'.r ana-irow-t|rJ-ui"*, wotrrd be affected.
Ron Riley,'the olrner'.explained that in gctyglity he was armost rebui.lding, andthe costs were so high !;.orto noi-.;;ti $t0;'''o"io"".orird.ins the pocket park,lll-yg: willing to do some work on-il,e"bari. Jim v. was concernecr thar in theconstruction process, there wourd-o.unlo".**ent of the buirding codes. He wasassured there wourd be. Jim lt qu"tiror"a timing: Bil [;i;;, the person who wourdbe doing the construction..*pruin"j'til'proj".ted method. Ron.added that hehad to do all of the construction wiirin 6 months, and was pushing for 3 or 4nonths' lrlill wished^to__require f.aca.je ptans jf all the worlllr.'itijio":mj";r.l-,i?:id-nbi ai",qi=iFn a certajn am-ornr-iii [iil.iofi.d?!f,pgg ti*".
More discussion of the deck folrowed, with peter expraining that the deckwas an encroachment guqf town properiv, prrr ir'r i"ii-ii,.i"aecks on thenorth side jn senerat aia nol ;;;i";;ii and rhat was part of rhe reason forexcluding it from the recommendation. w:tt suggest.a-ihut"it be a p.lanter,John stated that that *oria nu-u...pi.ni".
Diane expressed concern over lack of an.open.feeling in the front of the buiiding,and the fact that the froni "i.uitio"-jio'not "..i'Jp"ii.linn exptained thatone couJd see the sky through ih;-;;;r;rgs and this accompl.ished an open feelina.
i:'o:"'til:o,ilfrt;il.'::::l"o ii.,ii}L?," rhe modifications to the Gariery buirdins
. amendment--that al ternate'ln rne-eventuality that the
DU'l tding season.
Scott added anBridge Streetthe end of the
c -4- 2/8182
plans be shown for thebujlding could not be
facade on
ffnished before
The vote on the amendment was 5-0 in favor with Dan abstaining.
The vote on the motion with the amendment was 5-0 in favor with Dan abstaining.
Peter Patten exprained the memo. Diane questioned whether or not the urbanDesign Guide prin encouraged the bi.nJing of buildinfi. -wirr Trout questionedthe fire code with regard to the coveri'ns";i ;f.';;;?. ui,"v. Ihe buildingqepartment was to mont.ioi th" -;;r;i;;.ijon
una tire-ons-r^/ou jo monitor the design.will moved to aoorove the request per the staff memo dated 2/17/g2 with Lheaddition that ii'be.go1i1rmei-;;; I;;r;ea ,thit '.,. pr"pJiJo oesrgn and con_struction does nor j.1 un, ,ryay at i"""iire. ua:aceni ;rii;fi;:; curyent conformanceto bui i di ng code, rire_ o-raininl"i-ini"ir.riiiil.ti"nr"o.rinrurance rating.)cott seconded this. Dan added unH"iarunt that iher"'noi o. access toEne st'rage room from.the i-ii.rt]i""offjce. -ih;;;;."ilr
4_r,with Diane votinsagainstn and Dan abstaining.--oiii."iht *,ut'oil,",. oriioiis, had been criticizedror being too iaroe.,. an-d sle .-di;-r;; vote_in rauo"-or'iuiiing. two buirdings andmaking them look -r ite one bui-t"a-in"g."""sor" rert [he'riir"--in rn.rs case was smarrer.
B.modification in CCI to remodel the
Applicant requested to tabre to the March g meeting. Jim v moved and l{iilseconded to table this item a;-r&;.;;. *re-voie-"ui'6-o in favor of tabling.
Dan moved and scott :f.glq.g to haVe Jim Morgan the rnenber to be on DRB for themonths of March, April and llay-ntifr-OJn', chairman, as alternate.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
o
ON
1.
a
PLANNiNG fu\D ENVIRONN{ENTAL COI'{VISSI
February 22, 1982
Election of chairman and vice-chairnan.
Approval of rninutes of neeting of February 8, lg82.
Request to amend the Town of Vail zoning code to add a new zone districtcalled Arterial Business for an area west of vail Lionshead including vailAssociatestwest day parking lot, Vail A5sociates' shop and yard area, LagleValley Water and Sanitation site, ol-d Town shop site, Chevron site, Floly
Cross Electricrs yard site, Texaco site, Voliter Nur.ser,v site and the 61en Lyonoffice building site.
Request to anend section 18.54 Desi.gn Review Guidelines of the zoning code
specifying information which nust be subnitted with the applieatj-on for <iesignreview board, setting forth design review board procedurei and details.
Request to amend the zoning code to include definitions of "maj or arcade,r'Itninor arcade" and "anusenent device. " The request is to amend the following
zone districts: conunercial cores I, II, and rI1, commerci-ar service center,public use, parking district, public accorunodation district, special Develop-
ment Districts 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10 and 11. Major arcades will be subject toconditional use revlew. In ccr and rr, rnaj or arcades will be restrictedto basement or garden levels
Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCI to remodel the GalleryBuilding (ore House Building) to add a condominiun on a new third level
above grade as well as redesigning the entrance to the Ore House, expand ingthe restaurant toward the west and adding and rernodeling second flooi officespace. Applicant: Ron H. Riley.
7, Request for exterior alteration and modification i:r ccr to renodel theSlifer Building in order to add storage space on the lst floor, office spaceat the rear of the 2nd floor and a deck and windows on the Znd fl"oor. Appli-cant: Rod Slifer.
8- Request for exterior alteration and modification in ccl to al1ow theLodge at vail to construct Harryrs Bar. Applicant has requested thatthis item be tabled until the Mirch Bth *""iittg. Applicant: LodgeProperties, Inc,
4.
6.t*\
'l PEC -3- ,fiu,t 5.Request to amend the zoning code to incluoe defjnitions of "nnjor arcade-,,nor a rca e. an amusement devi ce pla
lJT.l:tTn:-i]lli"f.'i:ulnlll'",]:'-lh:,.lli:!^t1ry,!nls subjecr had come before theboard-. The fjrst tjme there *ur-no,-urjlrrru Lrrrre Lnls suDJect, had corne before the
was objectjon'io-1," t.icenci.,n l:lt.,*. lllticipation., the second t;me itrereH;d:*.:l;il,llo'ff;"1,:;:,lf:,:l"ny"lli_iiitiijld,ijJ.i';.I"f;.!fi.:::Jlff 'l:liilli:,:,:liilil",l::,i*'i;s:ili"ijil"il;;,li'liiJll'iii'nli.olEi'.ff:lo:i.,n!
ffi 3'' i*: EIH:; :,.1i::;j:,,,ili:i"::ili::q,ti,.!J'i[]il'',f;ltnli"l".ll;0".:0.,::iii5'.;3i g*:11,,::f ;_:;:; f _;i,"{iiigil=i;;";:"iil';..1:::E! ?; ??,"i,'fi::told that it woutd noi oe arro*"a-in';ffi ioll'ri';;]
The Plannino conrrilsl'9n felt that ;a I::^l.i=lg:essafy to incrude any wordinsthat relatei to establishments ihat"served liquor, since these were reguiatedunder liquor licensing' s."ii t"r-a and Jim u r".onouJ-to approve the recomnendedilii:il:lt' to the codE per ih; ;;;;; memo or zttttaz-iith the derjnjtions as
l.b. .l8.04.252 fiajor Arcade"Major arcade"-shitt rnean-J place of business where an jndivjdual , association,partnership or corporation mainiains more tr-l.n irr."" amusement devices.l.c. .l8.04.254
Minor Arcade
"Minor arcade" shall bean a place of business where an individual , associat.ion,partnership or corporation mainiains ress inun ior.-umusement devices.
In Commercial Cores_I :nq jJ, add. to paragraphs 1g.24.020 C, 1g.24.080 E andl?;33;l'l,ii;i.:;:il:ii ::jj;i;";ha"ir'not-be visibre i.o,, uny publ ic way,
The vote was 6-0 unanimous.ly jn favor of the amendments.
6.
Peter Patten exprained the memo and added that the neighboring buj 1ding, theslifer building, wourd be tr"u'i"i"u-r". separate issue, but was rerated as to:i'til";"liit3!;o, He expiain"a -ir,u-""J'on' roi-'".;;;';;;s the er iminat jon
John Perkins representing Ron Ri]ey showed erevations and explained why he hadhoped to have the n911 jgci.to h;rp-tne oesign ot-ihe-north erevatjon. He addedthat the appiicant y:: lgt strong-on retaining the deck. He showed srides andpnotographs indicating the view iorr:a0., and-how t[u-ui"*, wor.rrd be affected.
Ron Riley,'the owner'.exprained that in gctyal ity he was armost rebuirdinq. andthe costs were so r,19i, 1;r;;;i;;;"."*it Sio,o"oo io.'r"or:rdins the pockei park,but was willinq to do sorne work on-t[6"part<. iim v.-*ui-ion.erned that in theconstruction piocess, there wouro-o".nio"."ment of the buirding codes. He wasassured there wourd be. Jim N qr*ri;or"u tir;ng. do[ R;;;, the person who wourdbe doing the construction.
"*pra'rtnuj'[i'i p.oi".ied method. Ron added that hehad to do att of the construction utnin'o irontfii, a;;';;, p.rshing for 3 or 4npnths. }rlill wished._to__Tq, jre fa66s1g plans jf al I the worxliritijio,^:H:.ir"!',ii:ja-;;; l;"ii=irn a cerrain amo,ni-b[ yi""i"L"d?!",p1[ ti'"'
O1 ?r- ,,ff,
More discussion of the deck fo] 'r owed, with peter explaining that the deck\q,as an encroachment gugf.town property, plus the fatt tf,al"Uecks on thenorth.side in generar did not *o.[-*uii and that was part of the reason forexcluding it from the recommendation. l.Jill suggeii"o'ilut-it be a planter,John stated that that would be u..uftuUi".
Diane expressed concern over lack of an.open.feeling in the front of the building,and the fact that the front e'revation-Jia'not..uo ip"n.'iJnn exptained thatone could see the sky through the openings and this i..orpiished an open feering.
Jim v moved and l{ill seconded !o-gpprove the rnodifications to the Gallery buildingas-per the staff memo dated 2/11'/82-
Scott added an amendment__that alternateBridge.Street in the.eventuat itv ifiul-iiethe end of the buildtng season.
plans be shown for the facade on
buj'l ding could not be finjshed before
/. Request fo" ""t _C!l_!q remodel thesl-.reTBuid-ils.
Peter Patten expiained the memo. Diane questioned whether or not the UrbanDesign Gujde Plan encouraged the utenJing of buildings. -il.ill
Trout questionedthe fire code with resard-to the coverJ;d ;i ;#';;;?" uiruv. -ir,"iriri;r.i'
department was to moni-ioi th"-;;r;i;;ction and rhe DRB "ouri'"*oniiil #'ljiYn".
Will moved to apDrove^ll: I:gr:rl per the staff memo dated Z/17/BZ with theaddition that it'be.confirmed and issured.that the proposed des.i gn and con_struction does not 'in any ;;t ;i;";";ile-adjacenr urlrjlng;s current conformanceto buitd'ing code, fire oroinini.i-ini".r.rliiiiJti"ni"or"inrurance rating.scott seconded this. D{ added an ir"iarunt that there not be access tothe storage roon from.the t"ui "tt.i. office- ii'. u"i.""-s 4-l with Diane votingagainst' and Dan abstaining'--o;."e'i*rt tirii oilre. rriioirg, had been critjcizesfor being too laroe., and sie.-;i;-r;;'vote in favor or taking two buirdjnqs andmaking them look i.I'ke on" bri"l"Jin"gl''usor" rett itre siat*-in this case was_smaller.
The vote on the amendment was 5-0 in favor with Dan abstaining.
The vote on the motion with the amendment was 5-0 in favor w.i th Dan abstainino.
8' 199!gs!.fgr,glel_ior arteratjon and moa;rication jn ccI to remoder the
-l=goge at Vail to con
Applicant requested to tabre to the March g meeting. Jim V moved and wilrseconded to table this item as requested. The vot6 "ur-o-o in favor of tabling.
Dan moved and scott seconded to haVe Jim l4organ the menrber to be on DRB for themonths of March, Aprir and May widr-oin, chairman, ur-uJtu.nutu.
The meeting was adjourned at b:40 p.m.
t,.
..7
pr -J.'t,
MEI0RANDLJI,I
TO: Planning and Environmental Conmis s ion
FROM: Departnent of Community Developnent/Peter Patten
DATE: February 17, 1982
SUBJECT: Request for exterior alteration under the Vail Village Urban Design
Guide Plan for the Gallery Building. Applicant: Ron H. Riley
THE REQIJEST
The Gallery Building currently houses Runours night club on the basement
1eve1., the ore House Restaurant on the first or street level ald office
and storage space on the second and top levels. The proposalfor remodeling the building includes a totally new exterior appearance of
stucco and redwood, a new third level l uxury condominiuu, addition of restauraut,offrce and storage areas and revisions to the entrances and exists of thebuj.lding. The proposal is sirnultaneous and harmonious with t.he exteriorncdification request for the neighboring Slifer Building (considered a separateapplication) and includes several improvements on public property r^;hich
are stipulated in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. 'l.'he improvements(via landscaping and several sitting benches) of the Toun-ou:re<l propertyto the north of the building is being proposed as well.
the follorving is a floor by floor detailed account of the changes proposed,:
.a. ' Basenent Level
t, Add 338 square feet of storage area to the east side.
b.
2.
3.
Add i30 square feet of dining room space to the west (Bridge Street)side of the Ore House. This brings the west wall to the property
l ine.
Reinodel the entry to the Ore House orientingBridge.
Add a north side dining deck proposed to beof Vail property.
Rernove existing rock w.all on Bridge Street.
benches recessed from fron the street by new
5. rnstall 'lror'r'n of-vail" pavers on entire area fron entTy tothe ore liouse all the way across Bridge street and no"r-ih to theCovered Bridgc.
it toward the Covered
cantilevered over Torm
Replace with two public
rock wal 1 planters .
c]'y1,
Remove existing east (rear)
Town property. Rernodel into
feet including new fire exit
area of 84 squarc feet,
"-^
Second Floor
Bldg -2- 2/17/82
side encroachment of storage area onto
snal ler storage area of 254 square
and -service entry and additional bar
d.
I t. Add 865 square feet of office space to north and east sides.
v2.Construct outdoor deck overl ooking
feet of office space on r+est side.
Third Floor
Bridge Street and add 35 square
t-
Y 1. Construct new floor containing approximately 1938 square feet condominium.
A, COMPLIANCE TITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF THE COMMERCIAT CORE I ZONE DISTRICT
18.24.010 Purpose
.The connercial core 1 district is intended to provide sites and to naintain
the unique character of the Vail Vil lage conmercial area, with its mixture
of lodges and conmercial establishnents in a predominantly pedestrian
environnent. The dj-strict is intended to ensure adequate light, air,
open space, and other amenities appTopriate to the permitted types of
buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail
Village urban design guide plan and design considerations prescribe site
development standards that are intended to ensure the naintenance and
preservation of the tightly clustered arangements of bui.ldings fronting
on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuatlon of
the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the vil1age.
The Department of Comnuni ty Devel opment considers that this psoposal is
in keepi"ng with the purpose of the Cornmercial Core I District. The proposalwill not only accomplish two objectives of the Urban Design Guide Plan,
but will serve to drastical ly inprove the aesthetics of the entire building.
B. . COMPLIANCE WIT}I TTIE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
1. Sub-Area *Colcepls
' The proposal dj.rectly addresses two sub-area concepts of the U.D.G.P.
a, Sub-area Concept lB: ,'Facade ilnprovements. Increased gound floor
tTansparency.tr This is directed toward the western elevation to
inprove the attractiveness and visibility into the restaurant for. nore pedestrian interest.
Proposed are threc large windows broken up into smaller pines to
accomplish the objective of increased transparency. The buildingwill also cone out to the property line--closer to the pedestrian--
so that the desired effect is achieved.
eurr"lsrag . j- 2/Lt/82
b. Sub-area Concept 19: "Feature area pavingently to core area. rr One
of thc goals oi the Urban Design Guide Plan was to identify the areas
of entry into vail Village with special Paving tleatments. The covered
Bridge is the main entry into the Vil lage and the plan calls for pavers
to be introduced in this area. The proposal includes these pavers.
2." Pedestrian i zation
The proposat should substantial ly imPlove pedestrianization by providing
sitting benches off Bridge Street in an attractive atmospirere of stone planters
as well as allowing u"""ir to an inproved open space area to the nolth of
the builCing. The area between the Creek and the building has a long, complex
history of itternpts to improve it with landscaping, etc. This proposal
would accomplish such impiovement by a private sector initiative and be
beneficial to the Town as well as to the apPlicant.
Pedestrianization is improved by the installation of the "Town of Vaj-l Pavers"
on the south side of the Covered Bridge. This gives a special identity
to entering the Core area,
Streetscape Franework
The streetscape framework will be improved r+ith the rernoval of the existing
stone wa11 and replacing it wi-th pedestrian benches recessed from the street.
The new stone planters should be attractive and add additional color to
the streetscape, Also irnproving the streetscape framework is the restaurant
expansion and ne" decks on the Bridge Street side, This adds visual interest
and increases the total street 1ife.
Street Encl osure
The street enclosure frorn a pedestrian on Bridge Stteet point of view will
not be significantly changetl. The condomini.um j.s set back to the east so
that it is not visible frorn Bridge StTeet. However, adding interest and
a small anount of enclosure and interest r+i1l be the deck and planter for
the condominiurn which fronts on Bridge Street.
Street- Edge
The street edge should be improved with the pedestrian benches and flower
planters.
Bui_1ding Height
The proposal comes very close to but does not exceed the Urban Design Guide
Ptan height restrictions. 62% of the footprint of the building remains
below 30 feet, while 60% is the requirernent.
i
J.
4.
5.
6.
I
Gallcry BIdg -4- ?/17/82
7. Views
'ltre proposal does not affect anyglr:ting" view corridors. But a cornplcte
view analysis has been completed and will be presented to the Planning
and Environnental Cornrnission at the public heari.ng for the impacts created
by the new condoninium on the top floor. The rnain vlew corridor which
could be :rffected is fronr the transportation structrlre to the Clock
Tower. The st.aff is convinced that the design of the third level has
been accompli,shed so that this very important view will be totally unaffected.
Deliveries and service will remain via the alley on the rear.
9. Vchicle Penetrati on
a
Vehicle penetration will be substantial ly improved with theof a trash compactor on the east side of the buildJ.ng. This
the necessary trips to remove trash and, thus, accomplishes
objectives of the Urban Design 6uide PIan.
10. Srur/shade
instal lat ion
will reduce
one of the
The only sun/shade issue here concerns the proposed northern deck. Thestaff feels this is an impractical request in that north-facing decks
simply do not work in Vai.l. The deck will receive very little sun andis proposed to be cantilevered over Town ouined property, The north
side of the building has already been enclosed once to acconnodate thebar, and now the applicant wishes another addition over Town property
which rve consider unnecessary and inpractical . The Town council hasa policy not to pexnit encroachnent ;f this nature.
ZONING CONSIDEMTIONS
1. Uses
c,
All uses existing and proposed are pernitted on their respective levelsin Conrnerci"al Core I.
2. Density Contro.l
The site is 3160 square feet which allows 2528 square feet of GRFA bya 80eo rule. Proposed is 19i8 sguare feet of gross residential floorarea.
Coverage
The urban Design Guide plan alrows addit,ional coverage to accomplishbuilding additi.ons conforming to the plan.
Landscap ing
No reduction in landscaped areas is proposed.
3.
4.
3l
tl
Ga11 Brde -5- 2/t7/82
the additional restautant seats,
final deterrnination will be
issued according to the aPProved
ery
o
D. RECOMMENDATION
The Departnent of Corununity Development recommends approval of the nodifications
to the Gallery Building and the surrounding area. We are pleased that
the building will be inproved both aestheti.cally and functionally and
should rnake some dramat ic improvenents on lower Bridge Street.
Pedestrianization will be irnproved by.the new streetscape and the inproved
pocket park area next to Gore Creek. The pavers should also inprove this
nost important entrance to the Village. The conditions of approval are
as follows:
1. The appl icant agrees to parti.cipate in and not remonstrate against
a spelial improvenent diitrict for Vait Village if and when adopted.
2, The north side deck proposal be excluded from the proposal.
3. The applicant agrees to install at his own expense the landscaping
for the park area near the creek, his share of the trash cornpactor
and enclosure, the pavers proposed,. the stone planters and benches
and a street light long Bridge Street and the stairs from Bridge
Street entering the park area as well as the benches in the park.
4, The appl icant agrees to particiPate in and not renonstrate against
a nini- i-mprovenent district if one is formed to inprove Bridge Street
fron the Covered Brldge to Gore Crdek Drive with pavers and landscaping,
Parking and Loading
A parking fee will. be assessed for
office space and condornin ium. The
assessed before a building Permit
plans.
.\rr'1 1(:l; l:; lll .iil:liY t;1il ttt,t tltc l'lrtttrtttt,' ;rtr(l lillvi,',,,,0,t', I
'Iown of Vail wili lroltl a pul;l ic hcarirrg .iir accord:rnce wittr
of the Zoning Codc o1: the'l'or,rn of Vail on l;cbrttary 22, 1982
the council chlmbo's in thc Vail Municip;rl lluildi-ng.
Public heari"ng and considcration of:
(lirriri[i -ssion 01] I rir'
55'ction 18.66. 0(ri)
at 2:00 p.fll. in
1. Request to amend the Tor+n of Vail Zoning Code in accordance with Sections
18.66.100 through i8.66,160 to add a new zone district called Arterial l3usiness
for an area west of Vail Lionshead including Vail Associatcsr wcst day parking
lot, Vail Associates' shop and yard area, Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation
district si.te, the old Town of Vail shop site, the Chevron service station
site, lloly Cross Electrlcrs yard site, the Texaco service station site, Voliter
Nursery site and the Glen Lyon Office Building site. The new district would
allow a limited and specified amount of connercial , office, heavy service,
gencral service, lodge and employee residential uses along with public utility
and yard uses. Applicants: Chevron USA Inc, Alfred Wi-lliams, Holy Cross Electric
Associ-ation, Inc,, Bob Boliter, Vail Associates, Inc., Eagle Valley Water and
Sanitation District, Town of Vai1, and Andy Norris.
2. .Request to arnend Section 18.54 Design Review Guideli-nes of the .zoning code
in accordance r*ith Sections 18.66.100 through 18.66,160 specifying information
whj.ch must be subnj-tted with the applicatj-on for design review board, setting
forth design revi-ew board procedures and provi.<ling details thereto.
Applicantl Torm of Vai1.
3. Request to amend the zoning code in accordance with Sections 18.66.100
through 18.66.160 so that it includes definitions of "major arcade," "minor
arcade and tranusernent device.'r The request is to amend the following zone
districts: Conrnerc ial Cores I, II, and III, cornrnercial service center, public
use, parking district, public accorunodation distrj.ct, Special Development Districts:
2 - Northwoods, 3-Pitki-n Creek Park, 4-Cascade Village, 5- Vail Run, Sirnba
Run, 6-Vai1 Village Inn, 7-The lvtarriott Mark, 8-Fal lridge, 10-Val1i-Hi, 11-
Highland Park. "Major arcadcst' will be subject to conditional use review.
In Conmercial Cores I and II, najor arcades will be restricted to basenent
or garden 1eve1s. Applicant: Town of Vai1.
4. Request for exterior alteration and modification in Comrnercial Core I Zone
District in accordance with Section 18.24.065 of the Vail Munj-cipal Code to
remodel the Gallery Building (Ore House Building) located on Parcel A, Block
5, Vail Village lst Filing. The request j.s to add a condonriniun on a new third
level above grade as well as redesigning the entrance to the Ore House, expandj.ng
the restaurant toward the ivcst and adding and remodeling second floor office
space, Applicant: Ron ll. RiIey.
5. Requcst for cxtcrior alteration
District in accordirnce with Sc:ction
renodcl the Slifcr: Iluildi.ng located
Iril ing in orcler to add storirllc space
r:ear of thc 2nd f ioor.an<l ir dcck and
ApPl icant: Rod Il . sl ifcr.
and rnodification in Cornmercial Core I Zone
18.24.0(rS of the Vail trlunicipnl Codc to
on Plrcel ll, Block 5, Vail Village First
on the lst floor, office space at thc
windols on the 2nd {iloor.
:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I!fr1!0RANDtlM
Planning and Envi-ronnental Coruni.s sion
Departnent of C orunun ity Devel opnent/Peter Patten
February 17, 1982
Request for exterior alteration under the Vai.l Vitlage Urban Design
Guide Plan for the Gallery Building. Applicant: Ron H. Riley
THE REQIJEST
The Gallery Building currently houses Runours night club on the basenentlevel., the Ore House Restaurant on the first or street leve1 .and office rr
and storage space on the second and top levels. The proposalfor remodeling the building incl,udes a totally new exierior appearance of.
stucco and redwood, a new thj.rd level luxury condoninir-un, addition of restaurant,offrce and storage areas and revisj.ons to the entTances and exists of thebuilding. The proposal is simultaneous and harrnon ious with the exterj.ornodification reguest for the neighboring Slifer Building (considered a separateapplication) and includes several improvements on public property whichare stipulated in the vail village urban Design Guide Plan. The inprovenents(via landscaping and several sitting benches) of the Town-ouined propertyto the north of the building i.s being proposed as well.
The following is a floor by floor detailed account of the changes proposed:
a. 'Basernent Level
1. Add 338 square feet of storage area to the east side.
1. Add 130 square feet of dining roon space to the west (Bridge Street)
side of the Ore House. This brings the west wa11 to the property
2. Remodel the entry to the Ore House orienting it toward the Covered
Bridge.
3.
cf.
Add a north side dining deck proposed to beof Vail property.
Rernove existing rock wa1l on Bridge Street,
benches recessed fron from the street by new
cantilevered over Town
Replace with two public
rock wall planters.
5. Install tTown of Vail" paver5 on .entire area from entry tothe Ore House all the way across Bridge StTeet and norih. to the
Covered Bridge.
6.Remove existing east (rear)
Town property. Renodel intofeet including new fire exit
area of 84 square feet.
Second Floor
Gal lery Btdg -Z- 2/t7/82
side encroachrnent of storage area onto
snaller storage area of 254 square
and service entry and additional bar
1 Add 863 square feet of office space to north and east sides.
Construct outdoor deck overlooking Bridge Street and add J3 squarefeet of office space on west side.
Third Floor
1. Construct new floor containing approxinately 1958 square feet condoniniun.
!
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF THE COMMERCIAT CORE i ZONE DISTRICT''
I8.24.010 Purpose
The connercial core 1 district is intended to provide sites and to maintainthe unique character of the Vail Village conmercial area, with its nixtureof lodges and conrnerc ia1 establishments in a predoninantly pedestrian
environment. The district is intended to ensure adequate light, air,
open space, and other amenities appropriate to the pellnitted tfpes ofbuildings and uses. The district regulations in aclordance with the VailVillage urban design guide plan and design considerations prescribe site
developrnent standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance andpreservation of the tightly clustered arangenents of buildings fronting
on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation ofthe building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the village.
The Departnent of conmunity Devel opnent considers that this psoposal isin keeping with the purpose of the Comnercial Core I District. The proposalwill not only accomplish two objectives of the urban Design Guide ptan,-
but will serve to drastically iurprove the aesthetics of the entire bui.lding.
B, COMPTIANCE WIIH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAI{ DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
1. Sub-Area Concepts
The proposal direct.ly addresses two sub-area concepts of the U.D,G,P.
a. Sub-area Concept 18: rrFacade inprovenents, Increased gound floor
transparency. " This is directed toward the western elevation to
inprove the attractiveness and visibility into the restaurant for
nore pedestrian i.nterest.
Proposed are three large windows broken up into srnaller panes to
accomplish the ob jecti.ve of increased transparency, The buildingwill also cone out to the property line--closer to the pedestrian--
so that the desired effect is achi.eved.
2.
i
Gallery Bldg *5- 2/L7/82
b. Sub-area concept 19: "Feature area paving€ntry to core alcea.rr Oneof the goals of the Urban Design Guide Plan was to identify the areasof entry into vail village with special paving treatnents. The coveredBridge is the nain entry into the Village and the plan calls for paversto be intToduced in this area. The proposal includes these pavers.
Pedestrianization
The proposal should substantially improve pedestrianization by providingsitting benches off Bridge Street in an attractive atrnosphere of stone planters
as well as allowing access to an irnproved open space area to the north of
the building. The area between the Creek and the building has a long, conplexhistory of attenpts to inprove it with landscaping, etc, This proposal
would accouplish such improvenent by a private sector initiative and bebeneficial to the Town as well as to the applicant.
Pedestrianization is inproved by the installation of the "Tori'n.of Vail Paversil
on the south side of the Covered Bridge. This gives a special identityto entering the Core area.
Streetscape Framework
The streetscape framework will be improved with the renoval of the existing
stone l.val1 and replacing it with pedestrian benches recessed fron the street.
The new stone planters should be attractive and add additional color tothe streetscape. Also irnproving the stxeetscape framework is the restaurant
expansion and new decks on the Bridge Street side. This adds visual intexest
and increases the total staeet life.
Street Encl osure
The street enclosure fron a pedestrian on Bridge street point of view willnot be significantly changed, The condoniniun is set back to the east sothat it is not visible fron Bridge Street. However, adding interest and
a snall anount of enclosure and interest wi1l be the deck and planter for
the condominiuur which fronts on Bridge Street,
Street Edge
The street edge should be irnproved with the pedestrian benches and flowerplanters.
Building Height
The proposal cones very close to but does not exceed the urban Design Guide
Plan height restrictions. 62% of the footprint of the building renains
below 30 feet, while 60% is the requirenent.
3.
)l
6.
Gallery Bldg -4- 2/I7/82
7. Views
The proposal does not affect any existing view cdrridors. But a cornplete
view analysis has been conpleted and will be presented to the Planning
and Environmental Corrunission at the public hearing for the impacts created
by the new condoninium on the top floor. The nain vj.ew corridor which
could be affected is from the transportation structure to the Clock
Tower, The staff is convinced that the design of the third level has
been acconplished so that this very important view will be totally unaffected.
Service a.Ld Pelivery
Deliveries and service will remain via the a1 1ey on the rear.
Vehicle Penetration
R
o
Vehicle penetration will be substantially improved with theof a trash conpactor on the east side of the building. This
the necessary trips to remove trash and, thus, acconpl islt-es
objectives of the Urban Design Guide Plan.
Stm,/ shade
installationwill reduce
one of the
10.
c.
The only sun/shade issue here concerns the proposed northern deck. The
staff feels this is an impractical request i-n that north-facing decks
sinply do not work in Vail. The deck will receive very 1itt1e sun and
is proposed to be cantilevered over Town owned property. The north
side of the building has already been enclosed once to acconrnodate the
bar, and now the applicant wishes another addition over Town property
which we consider unnecessary and irnpractical , The Town Council hasa policy not to permit encroachrnent of this nature.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
1. Uses
All uses existing and proposed are pernitted on their respective levels
in Cornnercial Core I.
2. Density Control
The site is 3160 square feet which allows 2528 square f,eet of GRFA by
a 80% rule. Proposed is 1938 square feet of gross residential floor
3, Coverage
The Urban Design Guide Plan al1ows addit,ional coverage to accomplish
building additions conforning to the P1an.
4. Landscaping
No reduction in landscaped areas is proposed.
Gallery Bldg -5- 2/r7/82
5. Parking and Loading
A parki.ng fee will be assessed for the additional restaurant seats,
offi.ce space and condorninium. The final deternination will be
assessed before a building pernrit issued according to the approved
plans.
D. RECOMMENDATION
The Departnent of Corunrn ity Developnent recommends approval of the nodifications
to the Gallery Building and the surrounding area. We are pleased that
the building will be inproved both aesthetically and furctionally and
should nake sorne dramati.c inprovements on lower Bridge Street.
Pedestriani zation will be irnproved by the new streetscape and the inproved
Pocket park area next to Gore Creek, The pavers shoutd also improve this
nost imPortant entrance to the Village. The conditions of approval are r.as fol lows :
1, The appl icant agrees to participate in and not renonstrate against
a special in4rroveurent district for Vail Village if and when adopted.
2. The north side deck proposal be excluded fron the proposal.
3. The applicant agTees to install at his own expense the landscaping
for the park area near the creek, his share of the trash coinpactor
and enclosure, the pavers proposed,, the stone planters and benches
and a street light long Bridge Street and the staj-rs fron BridgeStreet entering the park area as well as the benches in the park,
4, The appl icant agrees to participate in and not renonstrate agaiast
a nini- irnprovement district if one is forured to irnprove Bridge streetfrom the covered Bridge to Gore cr6ek Drive with pavers and landscaping.
PEC -3- 2/8/82
5. $eguest tg lmend lhg zoning co4e to include definitions of "nnjor arcade,""mrnor arcaoe and "amusement device,, etc.
J'im Sayre explained that this was bhe third time this subject had come before theboard. The first time there was no audience participation, the second time Lhere
was objection to the f icens'ing, so now the licensjng part had been dropped. Hefurther exP]9jnea that the Special Development Oistiicus had been added'Lo thedistricts a'l'lowing arcades. Rick Sackbaubr asked about whether or not a ipaceunder the Gondola steps would be excluded from having an arcade jn it and wastold that it would not be allowed in that location.
The Planning Conlnission felt that it was not necessary to include any wordingthat related to establishments thai-served liquor, iii,.e ttl.se were ieguiateiunder liquor licensing. Scott moved and Jim M seionded to approve lhe reconmendedamendments to the code per the staff memo of 2/17/gZ with thb'definit'ionsaa -'
fol I ows:
l.b. 18.A4.252 Major Arcade
"Major arcade" shall mean a place of business where an iridjvidual , association,partnership or corporation maintains more than three amusement devicei.
I . c. 18.04. 254 Minor Arcade
"Minor arcade" shall bean a place of business where an indivjdual , association,partnersh'ip or corporation maintains less than four amusement devices.
In Commercial Cores I and II, add to paragraphs 19.24-020 C, .lg.24.0g0 E andl8-26.050 E, "Amusement devices shail not-be visible rrom iriy public way,street, waikway or mall area.',
The vote was 6-0 unanimously in favor of the amendments.
6. Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCI to remodel Gallery
Peter Pattei.exptainea the memo and added that the neighboring buiiding, theslifer building, would be treated as a separate issue, but wai related-is toexterior desiqn- He explained the reasons for recommending the eliminationof the north deck.
John,Perkins represent'i ng Ron Riley showed elevatfons and explained why he hadhoped t0 have the north deck to help the design of the north elevation. He addedthat the applicant was no! strong on retaining the Oeck. He showed slides andphotographs indicat'ing the vjew iorridors ana-how-the-views-wouia ue arieitel.
Ron Riley, the owner, expiained that jn actuality he was almost rebuilding, andthe costs were so high he could not conrnit $20,0b0 to rebuild'ing the pocki! park,but was willing to do some work on the park. jjm v. wai conceried thai in-tm'-'construction process. there would be enforcement of the building codes. He wasassured there would be. Jim M questioned timing. Bob Ruder, ihe person who wouldbe,doing the_construction explained his projecied method-- Ron adied thaL henao to clo all of the construction within 6 months, and was pushing for 3 or 4months, l,lill wished to require facade plans if all the wor(wqs *t Aon. qn time.Ron stated that if he couid nbi ao-ii-iir i teitaih atioint"iii r.rme, ne s.rmprywould not remodel at all.
PEC -4- 2/8/82
More discussion of the deck followed, with Peter explaining that the deck
was an encroachment over town property, plus the fact that decks on the
north sjde in general djd not work wel 1 and that was part of the reason for
excluding it from the reconmendation. l^/ill suggested Ehat it be a pianter,
John stated that that would be acceptable.
Diane expressed concern over lack of an open feeling in the front of the building,
and the fact that the front elevation djd not read open. John explained that
one could see the sky through the openings and this accomplished an open feeling.
Scott added an amendment--that alternate plans be
Bridge Street in the eventuality that the build'ing
the end of the buildinq season.
The vote on the amendment was 5-0 in favor with Dan absta'ining.
The vote on the motion with the amendment was 5-0 in favor with Dan abstaining.
Jim V moved and t^Jill secqrd-ed to-ip-Frove the modifications to the Gallery building
as per the staff memo q'6ted 2/17/82. \
\,-
shown for the facade on
coul d not'-be f ini shed bef ore r
7. Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCI to remodel the
Peter Patten expla'ined the memo. Diane questioned whether or not the Urban
Design Guide Pian encouraged the blending of buildings. l,lill Trout questioned
the iire code with regard to the cqverind of the serv-ice al1ey. The buiid'ing
department was to monitqr the construction and the DRB would monitor the destlgn.
l,lill moved to approve the request per the staff memo dated 2/17182 with the
addjtion that it be confirmed and assured that the.proposed design and con-
struction does not in any way a1 ter the adjacent bui'l ding's current conformanceto building code, fire ordinances and classifications or insurance rating.
ScotL seconded this. Dan added an amendment that there not be access to
the-storage room from the real estate office. The vote was 4-l with Djane votingagainst, and Dan abstaining. Diane felt that other buildings had been criticizedfor being too- larg_e, and she c-ould not vote in favor or tak'ing two buildings and
making them 'look ljke one building. Some felt the scale'in ihis case was-smaller.
8. Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCI to remodel the
Lodge at Vail to construct Harry"s Bar.
Appficant requested to table to the March B meeting. Jim V moved and lJill
seconded to table this item as requested. The vote was 6-0 in favor of tabling.
Dan moved and Scott seconded to have Jim Morgan the menber to be on DRB for the
months of March, April and May wjth Dan, chaj rman, as alternate.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
1.
2
3.
A
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
February 22, L982
Electi.on of chairrnan and vice-chairnan.
Approval of minutes of rneeting of February g, 1gg2.
Request to anend the Town of vail zoning code to add a new zone distri.ctcalLed Arterial Business for an area west of vail Lionshead including vailAssociatest west day parking 1ot, VaiI Associatesr shop and yard area, Eaglevalley water and sanitation site, old rown shop site, chevron site, Holycross Efectric's yard site, Texaco site, Voliter Nursery site and the GlLn Lyonoffice bui,ldi-ng site.
Request to anend section 18.54 Design Review Gui.derines of the zoning codespecifying information which rnust be subrnitted with the application ior designreview board, setting forth desigr review board procedurei- and details
Request to anend the zoning code to include definitions of ,,najor arcade,r, "'rninor arcade" and "annusenent device. " The request is to arnend the followingzone districts: cornmercial cores r, II, and rII, corunercial service center,public use, parking district, public acconrnodation district, special- Develop-nent Distri.cts 2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10 and 11. Major arcades will be subject toconditional use review. In ccl and Ir, major arcades wirl be restrictedto baseinent or garden leve1s,
Request for exterior alterati"on and nodification in CCI to remodel the GalleryBuilding (Ore House Building) to add a condoniniun on a new third levelabove grade as well as redesigning the entrance to the ore House, expandingthe restaurant toward the wesi and adding and renodeling second floor officespace. Applicant: Ron H- Riley,
Request for exterior alteration and rnodification i.n ccr to renodel theslifer Buildi-ng in order to add storage space on the lst floor, office spaceat the rear of the 2nd froor and a deck and windows on the 2nd. floor. Airpri-cant: Rod Slifer.
Request for exterior alteration and rnodification in ccr to a1low theLodge at vail to construct. Harry's Bar. Applicant has requested thatthis item be tabled'unti1 the rdarch Sth neeting. Appricant: LodgeProperties, Inc.
6.
7
B.
VAIL VILLAGEURBAN DESIGN CONSTDERATIONS
VIEW CORRIDORS
I'AJOB VIEW CORRIDORS
i' By Lodge At vail and rhe sweet gasir rooking east. Exi.sting najor.
2. Fron l.lillow Bridge east to mountain cliffs. Existing major.
3' At north end of covered bridge between Kiosk and west entrance to lit. Haus. New
4' 0n Bridge St. near Plaza Lodge entrance looking south Riva Ridge. Existing najor
5. From center of vil'l age plaza to Gold peak over Hill Building.Existing najor
5' 0n Gore Creek Drive at Mill Creek Court Building looking southwest.Existing ninor
7' Between Pepi's and Clock Tower Inn on Bridge St. - south to sk.i mountain.Ex. rnajor.
8.FromChildren'sFountainareasouthupl,lallStreet.Existingrra3or
9' Gateway to mountain on Seibert Circle toward Iifts between Gold peak House andHill Buiiding. Exj-sting rnajor
2 steps up from photographic point on Village Transportation center lookingsouth over the village. New
From mjddle of 4-r,ray stop - southeast to Gold peak. Exi.sting major
Red sandstone Peak from sitzmark and Gore creek plaza Building on GoreCreek Drive. Existi.ng najor
Red Sandstone Peak from Village plaza. New
0n Vail Rd., east of Holiday House looking southeast to Gold peak. Existing najor
MINOR VIEW CORRTDORS
1' Gore creek Drive looking east on Gore cr. Drive from children,s Fountain Ex. major
2. (l of series of 3) Hill A'l ley looking east. Existing ninor
2- (2 ot series of 3) Hanson Ranch Road looking east to the Gore Range- New
2. (l or series of 3) Hanson Ranch Road looking east to the Gore Ranqe. New
3. Seibert Circle looking east over Cyranos. New
4' Base of steps to Children's Fountain, looking southeast New view corridor, ex.
5- Gore creek Drive at Mill creek Bridge southeast to ski mountaip. New
5' South up the alley between l Vail Place and the Hill Building. Existing ninor
7. Alley between The Lodge and Lazier Arcade south to ski mountain. New
8' Top of Village Plaza steps looking southvrest to ski mountajn. Exi.sting minor
( cont i nued )
4 November 1981
1nLrJ.
. 11.
1?
13.
14.
focal
point
\
'7 ' 'iail Vj'llage - page 2 0f 2Urban Design Considerations 4 ilovember l9B1
" viEH CoRRIDoRs
_ _. a!;r-l, -
irrnor View Corridors (cont'd)
9. south of Crossroads Circle looking southeast on l,li'l low Bridge Rd. to skimountain over The Lodge. Existing minor
10- E. Meadow Drive and Vai'l Rd. from bus stop panorama view to southeast. Existing mi-nor
11. From four-way siop looking south. Existing ninor
L2. E- Meadow Drive/Vail F.oad intersection looking west over fire house. Existing minor
13. south crossroads circle looking northwest to Red g6nd5lens. New
14. To Red Sandstone Peak from Children,s Fountain. Existing ninor
!15' At south end of l'lillow (pedestrian) Bridge looking northwest to Red Sandstone. Ex. rftinor
16- South of Vail Village Inn tower looking east on E. l4eadow Drive. Ex. ninor
17. Steps at TRC southwest over Sonnenalp. New
18. Southeast from Vil'l age Center Circle Road over Sonnenalp. Exisding rnajor
1-9. From child*o*]s Fcuntain - northeast corner'looking north between pepi's
.-
'''---,.i.d. 1ne ,,r ee!.sir.* Bui lding. New
20. North on Bridge Street between Pepi's and Clock lstvgp.Existing rnajor
21. Hanson Ranch Road at Mill Creek Bridge looking northwest.Existing major
FOCAL POINTS
1- Rucksack Tower fron Pepi's deck and clock rower deck.Existinc
2. ciock rower from Hanson Ranch Road bridge over Mill creek. New
3. Rucksack Tower from steps to chirdren's Fountain, Existing
4. Clock Tower from llillow Bridge. Existing
5. vail village Inn tower frorn south of crossroads circle. Existing
6. Rucksack rower from Mill creek Bridge over Gore creek Drive. Existi.ng
7. Clock Tower from Gore Creek Drive west. Existing
B. Ambrosia Tower from bus stop on East Meadow Drive & vail Rd. Existing
'' Reno\.gg: -Intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive to WI Sports corner.
at
GALLERY BUILDING
ADDITION AND REM$DEN.
Porcel A, Voil Villoge First Filing
John M. Perk!ns, AIA
November 23, l98t
pate }Ap1: 1 i, :a'L J.on_?-3_-Sg.y.-f9€L_
o
!
APPl,rCATroN FORM FOR ExTnRIqR ALTEIiAtloNs
OR }"1OD;}'ICATIOT{S IN COMMNRCIAL CORB 1 iCCI}
This procedure i-s required for alteratj-on cf arl exrsci.ntj iluitrr:rnll
vrhich adcts or t"*ou-"6 apy enclosed floor area Qr oubiloor ;r.e--ic or
i"pir"or"u.t of an existiirq buildjng sha11 be subject to revie\f by
the plan;ring and Environmental Conunission.
The applicaLion v.'i.l-l not be accepted until all inforncttiorr is subi:tj-f.Lei-
llAi/.,x oF APPLrcil\NT'_- koa*l!r__lilell-_
.tl Ur, '.-ir!) D 4494 Stresolside Drive Vail , Colorado Pliol{ E, - .&?q:ll" g 9..----
B. Iisi'lE CF .hPPr,IC,\liT's RIIPRISE1{TATIVil'lo}q-!{:--t-gfEi+.ej--{14-*-_---
ADDRIJSS_ Box-355---,Yailr--Colorado - -------pLC"i:147tr=f,$45-
.liUllliCRi Z/tT I
S iGl'!..\T'Ji{11
ollliER
LIi'--"' t, L.t.:lSCl . -IPT -r
r)N
F1lj'l ii10C. C0 i-.,!-ps 18+ fcr ea-cli 1-:-r-'r'1;e::i-'y' o:'rer !o ;,:, -crtiiit':i1 -
y'O.a ,,/zSll,r /e1-or\ 4 ,-o{Y
j-i':I,li1vl,,l4lii,:r. 5Utsr.rli;Y 0;i PitOPEIr.'i')l :[IS]^JlNil ltllli-riil:llr.TY I,Ill;,;li i-i1l-; i,tfrilTf'3i'i
O.r IILI:L)IliG AN.] AtlY fi'lP]}'OVEIJLI'rTS ON TIi''-:l '1"'''-lii].
ojr TIIiI iliri.lr'l oir OI';l.I!jlts *F Al,r-, I'j;iflij:ii1.Y ;\ilJii!{-:l.l:jl: TO Tiji'
P F.LlPlili).il']/ ;r.)i D Ti iii I ]t Ai'ilrlLil;i:']iS "
..;cpj.r;5; cf a sil-e p1 I1r conta:;-nji::iJ l lrr: jlt''1 ls';':i-", i":i-r:::nal j-r''n:
.,.i.',c :.:l-an slr;:r,l.L be clr:niun on;l r;l;':llt-- si:e cf 2'I" x Ji" at a scale
* .ti'; a V.r:r j.atir:tr of the SheCt $j.:13 ialr" gC;;1,: riii-ly bC api)l O !.'(-':(i
:murri {t;' lr,':v{11.opmen{; Dlp;:r:tn'.rl:'t- if jul l''i I j''"d ;
I.
,o
C.
D.
F.
G. F. t,t,:t:l
',i, il..l.i,Ca
John M, Perkins/Architect, Al,A/r'qil Run Resort. 1000 Lions Ridge Loop/PO.B,266/Voit, Coto. 51ffi71fi3-4763b1$
November 23, 198I
Mr. Dick RyanDirector of Cornrnunity Developnent
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road WestVai1, Colorado 81657
RE: Gallery Building Addition and ReinodelParcel "A", Block 5, Vail Village First Filing
Dear Mr. Ryan:
Our firrn is pleased to present the following proposalin representation of Mr. Ron Ri1ey. We have foundthe re-design of the Gallery Building to be a verychallenging process, a process that we feel has yieldeda successful solution which will be a vital improvernentto lower Bridge Street.
This letter shall serve as request on behalf of Mr.Riley for you and your staff to lnitiate formal reviewof the attached proposal .
Please do not hesitate to call should you or anv ofyour staff have any questions or require any additionalinforrnation involvlng this proposal.
S ince re 1y ,Ill--*-*
ohn M. Perkins
JMP: fb
PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO THE
GALLERY BUILDING
Covered Bridge Building
John DobsonP. 0. Box 70Vai.l, Colorado 81658 476-1_1,67
Gasthof Gramsharnrner
Pepi Gramshanmer
23L E. Gore CreekVail , Colorado 81657 47 6 - 5626
Clocktower/Gorsuchts
John McBride
105 Pacific AvenueAspen, Colorado 81611 9ZS-ZI0Z
Town of Vail
Rich Caplan, Town Manager75 S. Frontage Road WestVail, Colorado 81657 476-7000
Slifer Q Company Building
Rod Sl ifer
230 Bridge StreetVai1, Colorado 81658 476-2421_
ADDITION AND REMODEL OF
THE GALLERY BUILDING
This proposal primarily involves an exterior redesign
of the building featuring facade and entry improvements as
suggested by the Urban Design Guide plan. It also ipcludes_ ..
the addition of a partial third floor housing orr" #-0" d-ft"
roorn condominiurn unit .
The proposal specifically includes the following:
Basement Floor
- A widening of the Bridge Street entry/exit to
the basenent, such that this entry/exit will conforn
with building and fire codes.
- The elimination of the back exit
the Ore House storage area and is
First Fr"t{'/ttdk v'rb ,F
that comes up in
i11ega1.
1-Ar. A4d+r'na,l ,7.3A S.F. oF Sfop.
fual2t*", e trr,.-)
ng 'an addit i onal .rH€- seuare f eet
of dining room space
is gained by moving r
r ine . 4qf" &*at
Restaurant and the
frorn the North side
eew,.\ {: or tz.
of lease-
Second Floor - p_tir,_iru+ii5 1' ;-"rur;;;f
- Enclosing'an ailditi
able office space.
- Irnproving the efficiency of the second floor for
office use. Presently this floor is being used
for offices and storage and was originally de-
signed for residential use.
4.b
8qa
s&/',',/-
- An additional_15!square feet
to the Ore House. This space
the West wa11 to the property
- A new entry for the Ore House
offices on the second f1oor.
- An exterior deck cantilevered
of the building 7L feet.
Addition and Renodel ofthe Gallery Bui.lding
Page Two
Proposed Third Floor I tqlb
- The addition of approxinatelyfi;6€€-square feet
in the forn of " %U"aroom condominiun unit
and stair access sDace,
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
FOR THE
ADDITION AND REMODEL OF THE GALLERY BUILDING
Street Edge
The street edge will be irnproved with the elimination
of the old Ore House porch and its rough stone wa1ls. Trans-
parency will be increased with the addition of the three large
dining room windows and the glass double-doored entry to the
restaurant and offices. New planters and public bench are
designed to be an integral part of the building and Bridge
Street.
Brick pavers are suggested to run frorn the South portal
of the covered bridge to the South side of the building
entlance.
Views
The third floor addition will not significantly alter
any vi.ews of the Clock Tower or Vail Mountain. The proposed
third floor will start 22' -6" back from Bridge street and will
be only 4?-Ott higher than the Slifer buildingrs North fascia
1i-ne' The only views altered will be fron the gravel walking
path on the South side of the Mountain Haus building where
rnutual tree cover does not exist between that buildlng and.
Gore creek. The units in that building are high enough above
grade that the face of the clock Tower will always be visible.
Please see Photo #14 for the projected ridge line over this
view.
Building Hei.ght
38% of the building footprint is over j0,-0' in height
but will not exceed 34t -0", based on an average footprint
elevation of 8,159r-0''. 62% of the building footprint remains
below 30 '- 0" .
Design Considerations for theAddition and Remodel of theGallery Building
Page Two
Pede s tr iani zat ion
The proposal suggests the creation of a forrnal pocket
park between the Gallery Building and Gore Creek. This would
be a sumner space only and would be a "dead end" relief space
fron Bridge Street traffic. Increased landscaping, benches,
hard and soft edges and possibly sculpture exhibits could happen
in this space. The cantilevered deck would create a nice
visual connection between people on the deck and people using
the park. Thi-s deck would be for sumner use only and would be
elevated above the park with private views to the creek.
Vehicle Penetration
Will not be affected by this proposal.
Streetscape Franework
Streetscape will be greatly enhanced with the new trans-
parency of the building and the added interest of the exterior
decks and planters stepping up in a relief pattern. The pro-
posed third floor will not be visible frorn Bridse Street.
Street Enclosure
street enclosure will be improved with the new lowering
of the south half of the existing building across and the step-
ping back of the decks in that area.
|.i{
8.{ If,i
ul
i t:,1 t..i.'rll
ittj
*,.:' .1h
_t-.4.
,tr.
:
.!
.q
't I
L
;-
-r'-- =11
12
. :,.,.
j
ll+
r,t
- i.,
' l:'Ni
a..,i.-s.I!
F
,51
!I6
5t
lJd
tnwn\l-liilD
-C:lt ( ( .t' / ;.s1, ),- ;te6"'l-
5.rtTs z /, z/tz
&lry
/.-.,r 5tz€ -
(-,'a t't r .t +i-
)
{
{frtr;r,*gg --
K tdoS
,7r,/o / {640/u,.
o
/ ''
/'<'t*'-''/Q'(
,-l /u * "y*37 ?o .Jr-.nt&
tt
lr(, . I/-K h/
q qL'/
+*-1fr",^0"7% /
2. //'7a/- - zuz-d?4t
,/)U4r4^ 47u't;&;r.drrrz
l/dA;L- foa,-fwi?nLTr"A'*ry
ft'"f^;y b,J^ ,2 - a Fz-r6taa^tu-try ry,*'1
b.
2: /u<i/b lt;rouzt.
a t-*7 tt* dp-
ot
D
e. qfqerttfrc rurnryw-,r+-
fk?^rt/\? 1r'rt4 Lr-4^;4 q?av" ur^t/- ?
..1nn *Vird-Otut ft^ fnaZ.aztu.-f aa b//
U:tAf'ua-fllo;^lu tlryv4 -
,75 'l nft,t w-ar\jth 4-l- l^rl aF. +&t-/hlrfii^1 '
@ erre
Iu/,frrr,ttvai AZ -^/bt^r,4iz" a7 d,h a^+ a/1/4,_
Araaru pA h,;rtl, ewa,?t€r^^' t"X Ul*iot-
tlAa,+-t
Stcf ktlr- )+ Z"d/ ,@di?^/vc &tazta.
Vlails
dhd ?ae{
(1,t"^"eflntun 6nv_ t7.r"r,f r-n frzr,n^ f/L{W7_
{. c*,t' Lr< W ,fi^}aL ,-d Ua,ft_ Vtw_rila,q._
&1""A"l-J""'*^t, ++*)
2 7{ ftj,t4dl<- arrfiry
J" fffi f{,,tu/t/L' ,r-W p"4,4
V. UylloL WJ,rn/t^1 ftt amnu+ +r-d
*rtrear glJqntilw t r-
e? M p,vnnzca:;;;*
t- ,+t I fuvt F"t;f b Vetuiw
E.
o
l^/14ir1-. %
f
fr
-d4at ta .M-Z
L.?J- t /fir*aW<a nr.as( 4C-
- t?44;l.0.t ,14.n'.-r^
PI,ANN ING A\ID EN VI RONNI] JNTAI, COI,IM I SS 1 ON
Dccember 14, l981
PRi]SENI'
Scott Edwards
lVil l Trout
Gerry l{hite
Dan Corcolarr
Duane Pi per
Jim l{organ
ABSENT
Ro5ler Tilkerneier
The meetlng was cal 1ed to
fol lowing a work scssion
STAFF
lJi.ck Ryan
Peter Patten
Petcr Jamar
Jin Sayre
Betsy Rosolack
order at 3 : 00 p . n. by chal-rnran , Gerry lVhite ,on CC4 zoning and revised .Red Lion plans.
l. Approval of thc Erireles of the Noveml.rcrJj, 19g1 jl]_eetJrg. ljill niovedand DuaricFncc?fffis. The vote irai 5-0, unanimous.
Peter Patten showed site plans showing ner,i lines rvith thc olcl property linesirl red' He explailred why the staff rJconrcendecl app::oval and Ken iuitron ""1rr*="ntingthc p1'operty owners explained that a clriveivay encroachnent on lot ll ivas tobe efiminated with the resubdivision,
Dan explained that no a.11owablc GRFA changes would occr-rr. Duane voiced conc-ern abouilot lines regarding the distance betwccn ih" buitalngs. leter assuaged theirconcerns ' Scott moved and lVi11 secon<led to approved tl-ie request for a nrinorsubdivision. The vot-e r\ras 5-0 in favor r^ritrr ban abstai'ing.'
2.R st for a n:inor srrbclivision of lots I0 and i.2 Block 1 Potat irPatch.Applicant:CDS Entcrprises, Inc.
3. Request for a rezoning of lots 1 thlou CIif fsi dc Subdivi.sion f rornResidentiai Ciuster District RichardBrorrn, Daryl R. Burn-s, David
to Single Family Oistrict. AitrlicandL. Cole, ancl Challcs I[. Roscnquist.
Pet'er: Patten explainecl the nleno showi,ng the site plan ancl discusscc tire grirphsin the ncno. Phil or:dr'ray explained t-hat hc ancl Dive Sncntana each had a contr-acito b t'ty a lot if the zoning tu'ir s changc,cl , and tirat they lverc instrunental inrequesting^the -rczoning. Jirn recal.ied that whcn this subdivision rr,as anncxedano zorted Kcsldelltial clustcr it was thc intentioll to r.cconsj-cler the zoni_1gat a later date. Ile rvas itr f4vol of thc cha:rge. Dan stated tha.t hc felttlrat 1ot 6 shoulcl bc includcci. 0rdrvay c-xplainccl t}rat llosenquist (ovmcr oflot 6) ivzrs in favor of chengirrg hj.s 1ot to cluplex (prest-.rrtly he c,ourcl blrirda possiblc 3) or l)/S. Orclway stated tlurt hc rlicln't- havc t.imc to study thcaltcrn-tives in frrl I ancl so icciclcci trot to j.nclutie lot (r.ilt rho t.!_i ,ri,,,,i . ...J !RoscDqtrist told hjrn lhrrt itc (ltoscnqrrist) voulcl n.t i.n-s.i.sa o,,"trJiijtt,i*"'j",ti,l li*':tut",0rdrvly wcnt on to srirtc tlrrrt'irc<.tij"noi',t *.,1 that t.h.i:; ri,i,;-.spot zoning to_r iot (rl;.incc it rr'lrs ldjlrcr.nt 1.o I{C zoning.
| -r- r2/14/sr
scott agreed with 0rdr.ray addi"ng that 1ot 6 was so clif fcrcnt, there lqas noneed to considcr it wi.th thc otlicr lols. Scott addcd that he was conccrncclthat thc houscs rtot. bc built high on the ridge ancl woncicrecl if a tra<ie-offcould be nadc in this resl:cct, Ordway assurcd scott that thc houscs woulclbe dorun tlrc hil l fa.r cnough so. that tbcy woul dn , t i-ntelf. err-. with others r vicws.Ordrvay addcd that sitjng was the maln i'caion-i,jt-tfri'i"i1""it. Jin voicerlcollccrn over the visual impact, also, then said he was sure DRB r+ould taketh 31 inlo consitlcrrtion,
wili moved and Lluane secondecl to rezone l.ots 1thru 5 to sirrgle Family.vote was 6-0, unaninrous.tne
Dan voiced his conccrn that the home orr,ners shor+ concern irs to how high theybuild, because the owners of the Riclge ircre purposely not building on thehigh point. Gerry felt th j,s was the correct . ro,-ri,'rg Lecaur" otherwise theowners ir'ottld be couting in rqith a series of requesti for variances since theRC zone in this developmcnt made it virtually unbuiL<.labie,
Prel im Rer,,iew Session fol Exterior: Alterations and l{otlif ications .
'Ihis sbssiorl was to decicle whcther or not thebe considered rra jor- - reqr.riring a 90 clay study,
studY.
subnr.it.ted pro j ects wouid
or minor- -requiring a 60 day
Al 1 of the follouiing were considered to be nrajor revisions:
Gallery Builcling
Sl ifer Buil rlilg
Lodge at Vail - Ilarr;,rs Bar (new location)
Red Lion Inn -Deck Enclosure
Thc mecting was adjourned at 5:J0 p.nr.
./
rrv#noN
TOWN OF
REOUEST
VAIL
JOB NAMEDATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES ,-s_--\rHUR iFBt \ f nu pvl
\-/ '" --_-*---LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
-tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr_n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
C HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
n
FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORBECTIONS:
E1,..
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
-
department of community development
July 17, 1981
John Perk ins
Box 2597
Vai1, Colorado 81658
Dear John,
Just a note to summari ze our rneeting with you, Rod Slifer, RonRiley, Mike and Dick and I concerning the Ore House Building
on Wednesday, July 1.
.It was generally agreed that the building could use sorne work
on the Bridge Street side to bring the building out to the streetfarther and increase the facade transparency in thj.s area.
Discussion about adding a story over the exisitng bar area and
adding an area over the northeast corner of the building also
took p1ace. It was agreed that no interference with the viewof the Clock Tower fron the parking structure area should occur,
John Perkins agrebd to conduct sone view analyses with photographsof the existing situation.
We also concurred that a trash conpactor should be looked atas a neans to reduce trash truck visits. Also discussed was
the fact that the zoning code does not peflnit offices on thefirst (or street) level as it relates tL the ,'triangle" in therear of the building, However, the Ore House could expand intothis area allowing a second level office use,
Please contact me or Di-ck if there are questions or comnents
Rod Slifer
Ron Riley
Michael S
$D\
DATE
CTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL :.'
se
CALLER
READY FOR
LOGATION:
INSPECTION:uror.r4*@)weo THUR FRI AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
B ROUGH / D.W.V.E FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FBAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr tr
(:^'tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr_
tr SUPPLY AIB
tr
vtN^L N FINAL
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
rv.Y. +- a T-
DATE
READY FOF
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES wED @ FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
E ROUGH / D.W.V.
g ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION E GAS PIPING
tr SHEETBOCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
fl rrr'rnr-tr FINAL
|,:.
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DISAPPROVED EINSPECTION REQUIRED
..'.
INSPECTOR
!
j
;.
?
J
a
c
?
:: '-1 ;: ..
- /3 t
='qr,
:r F ..i ,{
x^:!-
:::.(::
!Fr;
.li]=:; -
:<,ri: ,r
1F,".
x<'
i
i
i
1,,
l;i
I
I
I
I
I
F
c{
z
c)
z.
2o
I
I
I
I
i
I
t1r
fi
I
I
I
I
,;
F.)
(i,
z
t_,
rai
IE
tot(l
tztii
r5
=h.=
(:]-rui
1,Il,tl
I
I
I
I
II
C)z
F
LU-_to
0c
zz
ho. 0Xf;,oci
oroz>-O(l<Jz
o6-a" ?'
;o
: (\l
utF
o
.Jz
z
tr
o
-2.
u-
Lt L,,i
E
(u
(u
E
E
o
lT
&r,2
L!-
IJ"I
o-a
O
F(J
nrt-azo()
t:n
t
NLlIL'JNlVA
p+.,--. 3r:.-< tr
f<
lsE
+q6
ie
L4LuQdBr 39a41 z 6qg: #;f
xY<h9X:O|rJ!u<O<roclcoz
rr
3;
z.
;g
t
o
-t
I
I
I
I
I
J
z
J
LL
F
.J
v
a4
Y
ui
z
-1 |
l.-/a
tcel4Iri{)x;
*:
.-1 ,l4-ttLn
| -+-L) ',^1t ::
{ uj.1 E.nR
". ,| =>t=
zl =
r*Il:r
t-6 t
| :-, r1
ld/tJlql't.:ll1/4
I'.l)l';.t.1t?lat*ll=lo
5
H
J
I
6
ol
l-
u
tA
q
f.l
.l
.Y
-.1
ll,l&ao
a
6'qc4:\oI
ldl'
tl!j
(J
j
-{)I
fl
1
1
q
=i
4
7
I
N
('"1
a
fg
(
i
4i
....1
t.v,
')
4
sg
s-
Ic
r
.+
t
t-9
;n
z
cq
:.>-
5o
Ylt
I \.'"
Il'.rl
Tui
t;
1
;..1
,-sr:r
I
o
r)
!g:
n
I
l
I
I
I
Il-latr!laloI o]
I
o"
ic G;
tz.oo
.i
I
F
i
I
r!
F
UJbI...(r
fi'
dPcd(J rnuJ < .":
6z-8r(
<o(, F-
t'<
Lu=dil I\
E
Zt-
2t
-JZ6- ,-.
<;
YF
;<
d.*--.-€Y
J<(JoaLrl llJ
JO
."i5v!-,=zE/--+<
-YO
o\$ >
\tnil
lJ-
IU
a-
S a-3 e/
a-e 35/
zZ/
7
t ): >-)./(,"------
-....-.-..--':_t _f I
,/L/
-.2-'\ f- , Z?\c-) >z L <a
I
oz
t--
=
uJ
Ooo
(\l (\l
o
uJ
LUILt
=
UJ(r r
=Y
2z:5
z
z
I
I
I
I
Ilt
dr
-!x
wt-l(l'
3r
6z
Qzz
I
+
\-
$s: i:;
$*j il i
s$i l::azz='r > ? < As :3!;NaiEi{ r;;.
S =rli
rq<:r
\$
N
SJ.\
oro
LO
oo
(.r,
O.{
o
LO
cf,
o
O (o
F
=E
IJJ
o-
z
o
--)5
I(J
z
o-
tF
J
oz
d!
=:
Iz
I(J
uJ
=
UJ
uJu-z
tr
uJE()
uJ
3llJtuJEz
6ul
tr
oo-lto
z
uJ
(J
u)
Lu
uJ
r.L
FI
ul
o-
F
t--
z
o::
(D
aF
LU
J
UJ
oz
E3
J
9z
I
UJ
=
NOrlVntVA
"(
ES
;+ZztL-9 I oc!s96:F9oE-6 6 &'o66 3To z XiL!<3i 3do- !.? ;--x 2
dNA
+
=>c(
1Lr ,.
_ >v
z
tr
l-t!
.D
c
(5
t!c
F
(y)(\J
e
ad
UJ
z
E
o
x
zIF
!!
J
=LIJz
tltttl-ltllll? z- zF EH F6-zE-F
=F:ia:SBSEo?<rDE162=rllrtl||ltlE 9, ,?9 fr E: E].E iEH
HEEHgB
z
EJ
6z
IU
F
UJ-
t!
Lll
=
CE
;
F
F
6
z
cr
[l
=a
Lll
F
z
=
o-t,
L!zI
-
F
C\,I
I o-
f-
fi38ilP
sr{
z
tJ-
TN
F
J
c,Eo
(u
d.
o
a/,
o..|-
(u
!o
ii
=z.
E
I
u]
oo
=z
I
F =G
tr
Lrltoo
=
F
!+t
(u
!.rjct
=oa
E
&.
G
t,
!,1
o
1
o
E =I!
qt
ule.
=
tr
UJ(r
o
E
u-
G
o
t
oa
o
-
F
UJz
=
F
CJ
LIJF-()
<
<F
lrJ <zEt!F(rz
*9
|*<
t!=t
(,ozr-
>E
!z
<x\IFz()
=#Y,z>Y
E
t-E i'r
t,, z.o
J< (.)a?.3o
oz
F
C)
uJ-)
E
J
TIol
Y-l
IIJ
F
o
Jz
z
zzmo>z
JOo- lL
."i6
=EiaHg
c,
E
o
o
IDE
E
o
lj\. O
l6E ol-Ef=E
-:+-=i
E
=E,lrl
o-
=ot-ofEFozo
C)
E1!trL
=
UJ
o-
lJ-
L!
trtrtr
t
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
', This Easement Agreeurnt is entered into bv and between
the Town of Vail, a Colorado municipal corporaEion hereinafter
ca11ed "Grantor" and Rodney E. Slifer, John McBride, and
Ronald Ri1ey, hereinafter referred to as "Grantees."
WIIEREAS, the Grantees wish to obtain an Easement from the
Grantor in certain property owned by the Grantor for the purPose
of ingress and egress to and from the Grantees parking area and
garbage receptacle, and
W{EREAS, the Grantor is willing to grant such Easement under
the terms and conditions hereinaftei set forth.
It is therefore agreed as follows:
(1) In consideration of the sum of $1.00 Per year
Grantor hereby grants to the Grantee for a period of five
(5) years from the date hereof, and Easement for the purpose
of ingress and egress to and from Grantees parking area and
garbage receptacle, in the following described real property
located in Eagle County, Colorado:
A driveway approximately 80 feet
in length and 15 feet in width
located behind the Slifer and Company
Building, the McBride - Building, and the
Gallery Building and situated in part
of Tract G, Vail Village Fifth Filing'
North of Gore Creek Drive, East of the
McBride Building.and West of Mill Creek.
(2) The Grantee sha1l , at their sole expense, maintain
said Easement and keep it in good condition and repair and
at the end of the Easement term return said property to the
Grantor in the same condition it was in on the date hereof.
(3) The Grantees agree to fu1ly indeurrify, save and
keep the City harmless from any and all claims for damage to
real and personal property and injuries or deaths suffered
by person on said property during the term of this Easement.
--
In witness whereof parties have
Town of Vail
i'."72By
Rodney E.
id
McBride
Ga11er Building
By
Rona d Riley
ASEMENT AGREE}MNT
Page Two
Agreement
lifer
this 266 day
the
of
ed this
,g8A
Attest r
Bu
Richard Caplan,
Town Clerk
rng
r''nf/
,l I I nil 4,t','i!.L' ff
i {- '' \'''' -t'"
,^i..TOWN OFTVAIL
rrv#cnoN REouEbr
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES ED THUR
JOB NAM
MON
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION D GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER E HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,"t"roN neoue'sr
1
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON TUES @ THUR FRI
CALLER
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr FRAMING E ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION N GAS PIPING
SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWEB tr HEATING
D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED
RBECTIONS:
O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
-i'/-' ,''-;;3
, / /-DATE / / ./ (' JOB NAME
PMAM
CTION REQUEST
VAIL ,
j
SALLER ();t- o i)^.,:',,'. f
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON iTUES ) WED THUR FRI
LOCATION: i .r i, {}"
APPROVED tr DISAPPBOVED
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.E FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
D tr
tr FINAL N FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
N HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
E CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
,"rf"roN REeuESr
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
/-/- @
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES
TOW
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL .
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
[r*or'*ntr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
O FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED DISAPPROVED REINSPECTION BEQUIRED
(o
oz
F-
=E
uJ
ri::i
,!O|.e
=9 ;J
5o9!:u.! z'. <z;<azA
i zl aE r=lgo 'El>Z t.-1,-
NOrlVntvA
Y5o3oz z tL'-Fo o o!-
- ; -rFq g ;00EP dE;
6 B gE: ? 66oqtE
LrlJ:
IR 2ul
z
tr
z
l
F
qJtr
I
I
I
F
==
z_)
tr
c,'('o
(tlco
{J'
.tt(u
U'
sF
Iarf,
o
o!o
ui
=z
(D
__)
I
I
Il+lo
I
I
-lttl
LUI
ol
<lj>
<tF5-
IIIllill"tl
IJI Lr.rlIftItoll<l>t -J
r-l gE
tlIItl.-jl I(,t Ict Iot I"l Ixl(I,t
I.vt I(ut
I-ll
a^t Ivtl 9l(|Jt iil
tollolt<l>l JlEl <ltrt >l
I
o-
L
oo
=
F.
uJ
trI
&.
<F
lJ.l <zE(\zo()
;
LUJ
LIJ
>Y;c)
=<ZM3F:z
z
L]J
E
!-u ;\
=o2 o
z
F
tr.l-l
dq
N]
C\I
d1
LUF
o
Jz
z
.n=
. =<oo>z
O- LL
)."i6
==idd=
(D
o
o
!,
.=
rg
=zox
ot!+,Q
o=5>
(!
ott
ts
=uulo-zo
F(Jf
&,FU'zo(J
i]tJtr
-!!t:EEt-t
''i '
,
I
I
I
I
ji'l
rii
I
I
I
I
I
(.\
(-a
t-(':
(-
\-.
I
6
)J
o
o
u.t.rL dt .?
ir
()
;
(_,
()z
:<
ua
Go
((
I:)
:_-o
(:)
al
.{(J
(J
\t
::
ri)
)
()
JJ
t-.,{
!il
-J-
i.l( ) i |,rt]tl,,\
r_ri_rfl
z
tLt
.fia
(L
I
I
uJ
,--
c]
i.{)
J
. t-
vlO
.(
C{
ol
$rl
-l!xl
I
I
u,
:r.
()
aa
C)t-..)
.l-j
(r',
Z
(.)
(,)
(l:
Lt I
'14
()
iK
.l
el$l
I-ulFI
Il
YI
'{l
ql
dl-!i\JI
'r:l
(!lr{.I.al,l
.11
E
t,f
J
VIU
t-
Q,
-v
--1-
t-1
)
o
v'l
.)
Jzoz,^o
..-.<
crO
:) :)
J;{.{ 1!() () :- -
(,1 >-' 'r-
i,t: i,(3 tu l:
l'tr-Ir-;t-,.rt-; i- i
i::
"l!-{ia.
LU
fi
x
CI
t*
)
[H
l"-"(n7
i!
{
r
f
c
;
CJ
E -:-.' - |tl r'''
(, :1,LI
., .. \/r:-- l'-llr :: lrr
I i:-'-: .t r l/i.,. s ?' lr'r r. t'
a .: a.i --i ,:r
- -.- -u
(2
c(-to.i. l-c (-)
() t-()
a
LU
(:J
It-
l-:
,
!,.1(L
F
O
l--
.(
]l
I,i
)
al(a
.a
,:)
a--
iit
iii,
(,
ri
o-
C'()
oz!
*
ra(-,
(_)
ati'
I
7cl
:j
cl
:
l:
t\lo
a!.(t
(t
n-:)o()o
!l
:)
<--
:)()
al()
'r
,1. ,;l :::.
(.) tt) | 0)'li lljl {,1
Bullding Departnent
Torn of, Vall
Vail , Colo
0eatlenent
0ctober al ' 1980
The foLLorlng 1e an eetlnated butldlng echedu3.e for tbe reeodel of a portion
of the upeteirE of the Qre House bulldtug, 288 Brldge Streetr Vallr CoJ.o.:
l. Work to begln Novenber 1r lgEO2. Rough earpentry to be conpletod l{ovenber 6r l9BO.
3. Eleitrleal inetallation to be conpleted ilovenber 61 1980.
4. Dryrall and palntlag to be conpleted Novenber 10, 1t80.
5. Cl-eau up and work conpletlou date to be I'lovenber l5r 1980.
Thank you.
Stnc6rel.yrr-
- -{l I ;{{, \ ^V24a\/)- )Jpee Sekey Conbtructlon
PO Box 847
VaLl , CoLo.teI. th9-9088 or 476-6Oe5
Bulldlng Departuelt
Towll of Vall
Vall, golo.
Qentlenent
October al , 1980
Coacernlng the propooed renodel of a portlon of, the eupstaire of tbe Ore Houee
bulldlng, ?88 Brldge Street, Vall-, Colo.s al-l exterlor painting rllL be con-
eletent rlth the exletLng textures and colora. $o changea ln exlstlug colors
rll-L be nade. No exterlor etructural cbangee wiLt be nade. The lntent ls
to epruce up the exteting bulldlng by repalnttag tlth the exlstlng color6r
Thank you.
Slncf,tely r/^1)twlt;H:"Hil con'tiuction
Vai1, Colo.
Tel. 949-5o88 or 476-5023
'l
J
Project Application //'D^t" /o/t /go'-'- --------------- ---1
Project Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
.-1r.r, i/h 2, r'1 ,' '-
Legal Description: Lot
/
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
outu /o - /{-{uu
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVALAPPROVAL
Summary:
Date:
Zoning Administrator
Date:
Chief Building Official
TNSPSToN REeuEsr
]OWN OF VAIL
DATE
BEADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON trUES -,,WED THUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr FRAMING O ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
q.RETNSPECT|ON REQUT RED
INSPECTORDATE
8",4 ;t^-,- a, ufd{n 1o'fr"ffi u esr
TOWN OF VAIL
\TE
READY FOB
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr
tr
tr
GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIC,AL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
O ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR -
tr\c Frrunr D FINAL
APPROVED D, REINSPECTION REQUI RED
CORRECTIONS:
,t- ,'DATE INSPECTOR . --
,i.
'4)rfi
cb
T
I
=
E
uJ
-ar=<!1<
_<9r
il'<
rr"-"f
i^9y4Z"i,<a7.azzTz.=-r
>a,:!:-::
;!r:..i
<oa
e<v
z
I
I
I
I
I
Irft
t<t
IFtq)z
l=to
lotz
N0[vn'rvA
Ritr6<F6r'rl2Os>6 g
=9oOu)c) u,J t!<CDlr
(9z
ii.]:<
=E6f
!^ao
diur(r
i=>+YOE.(J<oz@22
xg
1-
=Z Zu-
i o- 4=Y:f>Yi9 oI
U>AEz>oobq.ezXrJ- <oq iu.r t:
:* -=
dN(J
+tc,(l,ccoo
(u
#
!
(U
v\
=cjz.
?,1;l
ol
:l
=l
II
t
O
uJtoo
Eoo
J
fl
olol
1l
<l>l
tltltltl|lql
rtl{-l I(rl(,,1
Itrltal!91(u;Iz^l1ol<l
=l JlEl <ltrt =l
z)
u-
+t()(ugcoc)
(u
(,,
t-(Uv)
(u
lr,
oT
(l,
!O
ui
E
z
IL
l"
I
nl
5tol<l
<t =>l (J
I
Il-
l"
I
sl
HI
xl
al--{ >-
>l (J
d
tri\?<
b2 o
z
I
Lr.l
-)
I&F
L!
J
x.
>Y
=#]FJZo-O
<F
lrJ <zg.t! F-(nZ
F
t|-lt'r
L)d.
z
F
C)
lJ.J--1oE.L
o@t
(f,
FI
Io
u.l
o
ts
=E,lrlo.
Jz
z
.n9
=<mo>z
O- L!-
)dfl
\J\J=
=Ee
dd=
L]Tf
qr
E
o
o
o,
)lE=
ctY
ou-r,O
OFtr>rFqt
(l)
\
zIF(J
f
E.
6zo(J
.
t
DAn
*
I
Project Application
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
o^r" "5- /7'ry
, .."ti}'
)'l ]l
DISAPPROVAL
seconded by: y'Ll;I,(/dL
APPROVAL
Sum mary:
Chief Building Official
a INSP#T.ION REQ.U
TOWN OF VAIL*r,3-//o fr .,(/t*ry*t &r-^'t,
nenoyupoR tNSpECTIoN:
LOCATION:
NAME
CALLER
WED THUR FRI PM
-&ierrrrspecroN REeuTRED
'o€-
BUILD!NGT
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr BOUGH / WATEHtr FRAMING
tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL N POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT N SUPPLY AIR
-tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
oerc z --- z--a ---? rNSpECroR 4/E----
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
February 19, 1979
department of community development
Holmes Underground
Judy l^li I I bu rn
Box 3.I23
Vail, C0 8.l657
Dear Judy:
I am sorry for the mix-up in the requirements for the exit doorat the northeast exit of Holmes Under"ground. The misunderstanding
had come about in the calculation in your occupancy 1oad.
The Vail Fire Protection District had calculated your occupant load
using a different occupancy'l oad per square foot than I had and bytheir calculation the exit wou'ld require panic hardware, The Fire
Protection District f ist your occupancy load at 150 persons wh'ich'is almost twice what I had calculated and any occupant load over
100 requires panic hardware on the exit door.
This misunderstanding has made the Fire Department and the Building0fficial aware of the overcap in our code enforcement and safetyregulation. Due to th'i s incident, we will now be working in close
coordination to eliminate a conflict like this from happening again.
I hope this will clear things up for you and if you have any questions,
p1 ease do not hesitate to contact me-
Mark l,.l. Marchus
Chief Build'ing Official
cc : M j ke ltlcGee, Va i l Fi re Departnrent
Colecn Kline, Town Clerk
MWM: caj
YliIltg-P9Pgl!r-er'!lnrn
P. O. Box 100
vArL, coLoRADO81657
476-2200
476-5613
Ext.223
228 Bridqe Street
a-/ 's c
4V /, /777
Date served:Jan g' 1979 Date ot originat inspection:Januarv L9. 1979
Holmes Udnerground
CORRECTION NOTICE
Building address:
Time served:
Building name:
Building owner:
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVEHS THE FOLLOWING:
It uNtFoRM F|RE CODE (U.F.C.) VIOLATTONS tr
tr NATTONAL ELECTRTC CODE (N.E.C.) VTOLATTONS tr
tr NATIONAL FIRE CODES (NFPA) VIOLATIONS tr
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PRACTICES
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:
Uniform Fire Code lq.lgq (b) All doors in or leading to exits shall be maintained
openable from the inside without special knowledqe or
effort or a ke.y, at all times the buildinq or area served
ereb
Manual I rated ed or flush mounted bolts are rohibited.
ACTION REQUIBED TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS:
Instal I nani duia he No ast exi d remove r turn door
ati f
rdware sha and aDDro b.y the Fire Department.
ctrED ooRRECTIONS SHALL BE COMpLETEo, sy. $: 00 )iffvt. / p.M. 931s. Feb . 16 . 1g7g
FAILURE TO COMPTY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U.F.C. 1973 EDITION
COPY TO: tr VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
tr WATER & SAN.
BUILDING OWNER,/MANAGER:
FIRE DEPAHTMENT OFFICER:
D VAIL POLICE DEPT.
tr PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC WOHKS tr HEALTH INSP.
EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING DEPT.
,zz7r2F 7VAA.| /a,tL--
n
tr
(Tifle)
Vail Fire Department
lurn
P. O. Box 100
vArL, coLoRADO81657
476-22@
476-5613
Ext.223
Dateserved: f;t4 ,/ /; ,7o
-
Buildins name: /16trz'f-s' Zre&aCz-a'*t/
Buif ding owner: l-i- -f,''zo'--
Dateof originalinspection: y't-l I 2' l2 Z ?
Buildinsaddres, Z ="f'Bn'/L- -Y-
CORRECTION NOTICE
Time served://.,30
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:,/ ,/tr UNIFORM FIRE CODE (U.F C.) VTOLATTONS U/Snrerv VTOLATTONS
ET UNSAFE PRACTICES
tr OTHER
tr NATTONAL ELECTRTC CODE (N.E.C.) vtOLAIONS
tr NATIONAL FIRE CODES (NFPA) VIOLATIONS
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:
?/'C-/o3 4 a/o oBJ72//€27c^LS anL 2J 2r1, Z-6tt/1 |'-{ "
ACTION HEQUIRED TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS:
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U.F.C. 1973 EDITION
COPY TO:tr
tr
VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
WATEH & SAN. DEPT.
VAIL POLICE DEPT.
PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC WORKS tr HEALTH INSP.
EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING DEPT.
.l4ttz €,arz/ R J/1,4 L <-
tr
n
tr
tr
BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER:
) c1{7}/? ,r-fl"- J:.,"/;Ztzrf c-xt;- / 4zZ c?g-v-fr,e/<,/7eil: S:ro/Zdddf
,6t/ a/ z,ttz rvao--7^,
(.rr,r.lp.rr,r. o^r", 'z:-'e8 / ti7
(fit16)
DATE JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
READY roL]U***,s r'fril) ,nr* FRI
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERT] FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
ELECTRlCAL:
E TEMP, POWER tr HEATING
E ROUGH EI EXHAUST HOODS *
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
/./ar7rr9
tr DISAPPROV REINSPECTION REQUIRED
{
Rca ttt Dt cbfaL
Project Application
Date
Project Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Dbsign Review Board
DISAPPROVALAPPROVAL
Summary:
Zoning Administrator
Date: li /' l-/ f -7 F: Darcl
Chief Building Off icial
Project Appliealion
''"'rrNr:i1..
,// *-t'.??
'
Project Name:
Project Description: ..-.-.r-
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Zoning Administrator Chief Building Off icial
al
Project Application
i
l-Y -T?r--EF4r- l *n
'
(
Proioct Name:
Proiecl Description:
:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot , Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Motion by:
Design Review Board
tDate ' I
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Zoning Administrator Chief Building Of{icial
Date:Date:
o INsiPECTIil| FlEEUEsiT
TOW OF VAIL
JOB NAME tfj-t-cJ
D orxen
CALLEB
n pnnrrnl LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR ffi,*
COMMENTS:
E npp RovE D
D uporu rur
CORRECTIONS
fl or snre RovE D fl nerNSPEcr
D uponr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
INSPECTOR
INSiPECTIT'
',/./
t
n pnnrrnl LOCATION
TOWN OF
FIEOUEsiT
VAIL..t i, /- ..'-'t .,,.': | ,',1OATE . '" , I'' JOB NAMEz-_ _t /
TIME REcEtvEo ;,., -'' aru.ptvt CALLER
I :':
n orxen
MON
COMMENTS:
FEADY FOR INSPECTION
THUR]
' ' i, "i
FRITUEWED AM PM
.l-
F^PP ROV E D fl or snee RovE D
D uponr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
D nerNsPEcr
/i', /'\ .---
,. y'.1 i.-'t -.u
11 ..'. I'ur/-c'24DATE
SPECTOF
FIEGIUEsiT
OF
i,
n orxen LJ PARTIAL LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
g*mfi6iio I otsappRovED I nerNsPEcr
E uporv rHE FoLLowrNG coHRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DArE 8- 3 ,' -7 f-
INsiPECTIfi
TQWN gF
FrEoHeqr
VAIL
JOB NAME 'I. :,q"
!,\-PM CALLER
E orHen fJpnnrrnl LOCATION
READY FOR INSP€CTION
WED THURr MON
COMMENTS:
FRITUE AM PM
f,J'aeeRovED fl orssppRovED
LJ UPON THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS
n nerNsPEcr
DATE
tJ)
I.IJ
UJ
lJ-
b
=
UJ
UJt-
z
zz
LUF
o
E
E.
az
o
zz
I
I
I
I
I
I
F
F
z
(j
z
z
,l:
U
F
a
!,1
z
()
l
e
B
F
F
F
F
F
z
z
a
(.)
F
J
B
zv
O
lrlt
=g
L/J
oz
oJ
3
co
LL
=E
uJ
F
F
z6
=
NOtlVn'rVA
dN
,<t-lEI
=r390 |qzl
=FdE,{
tsc{
5$
il$
A
\!,
af
(Jz
:)()
<\i
z
tr
E.
P-az
TL
[!
F
.1
t
o-
LU
J
z
Eoo
z
tr
t
UJFJ
=UJz
z
Y
o-
9lu) tY.J tl-t;>'. ()ozz)
F(99zaA.!.lJ IY< E ?F3z-.';{5 rUH
:>(JE;o6=>U
z
z
E
It\
I
ol-z
f
z
=J
UJ3
z
tr
.J
=az
UJ
LIJ
IL
i
2
z
a
oat
IJJF
3
UJF
z
S
UJ
aaL!z
iF
a
-=H;bilP
IJJ
aO\to
oz
ts
=E
UJo-
oz
Fo
uJ-toE(L
u.lF
o
Jz
z.^9z2d]o
=z
\o- rL
NnnFl
=l
Fl "dgbt
=Eit|'{s g
' NNn
Eo
EctoE
oT'
!c:
E
Eo(,
o
F
=E
lrJ
o-z
eF
C)fu,Fazo(J
oz
Jtr
F
$
N
$
=z
E
dd$
$q-
)l.$ l=\t t*
NI
Jdt
Fl d=
taat
u.lEsf
=
Ittllrlldtl
IJI u.tI UJItEllolt<lEJd<t Ftrl >l -
frl
3l
1t
al
=l
ttr
al
uJl
:l
al
>l=tr =E
uJtoo
)a
Io-
F
(J
e.
lt.lz
=
r
UJ
I
E,
a#8
$HE\o=NU
<o(JF
t<_btr]2UrO
2?
=#d6
<F
YF7()e<
t,z
-O
t
t-E i.
=-r- rY
rJz
<Qqfl
oz
F
ttuo-
oE-.\FQq
\ -cS
z l,q6 l>-.2
9!3t=<t a- -rr-EiI
-<9i"!
<'?z-
F!r,r -l
orr.r9!ciadi!eio9io\z'<z,-<oz6
=zz^)>?<a=
lFF.Ooo<o<'Jra7,:
'li2iri6!;;<e <q1o-l!l
- i -. < d
t> -r/,<o*-ara X<c.<3,1
NOIIVN']VA
E
=ZztL
i o. q=
Y-->v;odi
aorrz.>oo()n(JzH
LL<oq dr.rJ ;i+5 si- /-r
'-rNO
z
LL
6
F
LU
zlm
-\
UJ
z
a
frtl
3l
1l
al
>l
Io-
I tr
LU
1
>l
IL
F Etr
flE
3l
1l
=I
fll
5l
fl
=l<l>l
o
fr
1
=
T
o-
F (rl
tLj
I
I
t_lE
I
I
-lal
uJlEIol
<lJl<t i>l (J tr
Ul
oo
I
o-
F
O
t
uJz
3
UJ
=I
<F
ur<zE
tJ.t F
<oOF
:<l; Ei,
-=r*6
z
cn
=
d
Y
.'
,
<^
:IF7()3#
fiz
_O
E.
=Oz
C)
<()(') ua:f,
z
-C)
IJJ-)
UJF
o
)z
z
zemo>z
OL
.^i5
===coil>
c
E
o
c'
0'E
.ts
E<
t=
ott+.OC rrro-E>iF
F
=E,lrl
o-zIF()fEFazo(J
r,rtrI
rtrtr
l,r.:
:
INsiPECTI FTEOUEqT
V'EtIL
i-t i-:.;..
TOWN O
JOB NAME )i
CALLER
l ii : i
f]ornen
MON
COMMENTS:
f] pnnrrnl LOCATTON r'l '
, _.,i{- !.d, \1 ';I r 'i, , (.,. ,f "'.
RlApY ESE lllqPEcr-r_QN
[*e+R.ovto I orsnppRovED [] nerNsPEcr
I upoN THE FoLLowrNG coRHECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
Project Application
Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
legal Description: Lot Block , Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by: B Ce ,, J-'^e84
seconded ,r, 3-r^ *J--t*rn
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Zoning Administrator Chief Building Off icial
T'USIGN }I.E;VIEW tsOARD
DATE O}'MEETING:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
oMarch 16., L978 a
BILL RUOFF ,/'
BILL BISHOP ,/
SUBJECT:Gallery Bldg. (Ore House)
5,BLOCK - ,TILING w 5thLO(I
A TION TAKEN
MOTION
VOTE:
We,lnv
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
ABSTENTION:sHqPr{?r - FnsN'I W{{ 1I
APPROVED:
DISAPPROVED:
SUMMARY:Dg)
a tF
T**
4h
is,3[i:#.s*:ff.Sff.1i:ffil. Itlt ta ro.r ril .! Dt lao.
n|llfil. lb oa.Bto3, to3 'd in- -ooo't'Lrrllco ct t!'r d n"5iffi-iiro.ooi-iJ-tra sr.rsos 9.ltr_ bil rb. er.nt..' tD.
#iffi"#s;lfl sii{#,#Eh'H-';fr fr il
tltoal 2r Lror 9.lI lorth' or ror! -!9.!ltlc'lly tb'
fcrdirtrv'34 t..t ot tot A, uocl l, v.ll vlllq' "e'ilitlllrN. -lo.?t tt. l..t.rlt t l..t th.r'ot '
LDtact to Gba follorlng G'ooalltlon.. coranantr, a"trlF-iiiJrt-tom -rgleoo to-uy ttrr Gr.ng.. by 'cc'Pirnc' of
aft tc Dsctr3tt d..crlb.d h.r.ln .b.ll br -ured or oc'
irb ttr -t-oi -iii prrolrr -ot!.r tb.a D.d..!rt.al ^
bl.otcl:
lhltrc-iocc--rrltlrr ifirr-rr .nd .gr... !o. -c-r.nt ''| bol'I 'r'EEell. -.ai:;;! iaiiiiiv, rnc - tor utll ltv.'nd l'-!d'c'tt'il
tat ;1{9!!.; t! f9q r tiirr .!clo.ur. "1:1bt-l-"::! :*.::f-r Eirii# 'd- rt16 rrr reeto'ra bt th. D"lgn l'rt'r
d tb Ur cf vrtt oo lo$r.t 14, lt?6.
(tl fo Drotarly ltarctlbad h.r'ln '-b'l I b' u"d ot Gon-
.L.tra fa'6trnf r-Gi th: ;;; i.rrdonllrr tloor rr'r or d'D'lty
ffrf- g-Criti rcfi r r'ntf tr.e to und.r 10'6 ol v'll l"' dul
lttatlc..
tll 13 tla raat.rlt antr.nc. !o tb. .bot' "tcal!'C'rli l-a;rrrriitortce .n r.lnt.ln -r .1t!!- !3.,{t!::
ffiltctftr& lrrsl TD .l|Itt IJFt
','lr,rll.l.t.ll|rlltr rE-alil
-aaara a
ra.tslst!octt ocaIttct .hr:
a.ass lbadtia Olaat.!a ,lthtrln al r.
Daacaablaagalnat Iclrlr th.
Or|ntor.
trtt! ol
corrl ot
-Q- ".,#.ffir
Efit:;ii rt.; fJ-c-9." io thr urc ot thd gobllc tot
H ial.
l. .h -..rlLa FtFstt i.tl r.
-allf, lr|t hrr4.
tal lr aaaaaalt 20 l..t ln :ldth l''r'1n9 gtn'r'-llt
rt iiilr -ii-|rrcrf|rc tsot rtt tra tb. Publlc thorothf'r'
.;*;fr-.rl-oc'tr rrciuio PioFrty to Grnlil l' ?ord l'rl
=-ifit;ra
ci tli lrierti6 -progrrtv tr r"'rt'd roto
; ror-iChitiha ral rcrrr ot lllty Pur9o"' lor th' ut"
-a -tatrrt oa ti. D.bll3.
ooltltrStr tfltrlctl , ad
t.r rltl tt l.- ra -aff b
lot,
F
-lo
!ab
6.lr
aa
Jt
i.It|
.G-ot
)tala
iatrrll
trrtlldatto! of anl og th.aa coni!lttooa, corlllntlrtartstcl loaa. of talarrrtlona, or lny garl lbaraol by ,udlDnSt os€q.t! ortar .Lll ta F rlr. .tt.ct rrw ol ti. oti.E 9rorl.lc.r,rDtch lhall t.irln ln lul,l lorc. .nd .ll.ct.
$0 l Yt lf,D !O IOLD th. r.rl prop.rty .bov. b.rg.lrod .|ra{$clbrdr snto iha ora[!aa, lta auccarrolr and artltnr lorrrrrl r!.ttL €raltor, tor ltr|ll and lta rucc...oEr covrn.nlr .nd agraaa toard fltl tha Orantaa, ltr ruccororr rtid aralgnr, tha rlrota ltar-i.lr.d r..1 9ro?.rtt to lAttlnt Af,D tolwlt DltlID tn th. qul.t .tral
ttaacrabla goaaaaalon ol tia Crrntaa, ltr auccaaaorr lnd raalgna,rNalnrt all ar|d avary prsron or parronr lrrfullt' clrlrlng os toclalr lha rhol. o? rny prrt th.rrol , by, through, or undar lha
Ora|ttor.
If lllfltg n!tlo!, th. Grrntor hrr hrr.unto ftt lta handdry rnd yaar llrrt rbova vrittrn.
ta-rt.
rra
Fa
ociar
llttrarrtrtoler
!aala.lor
L
,
) Bi.
)
atlTl ot coLRADo
cltttt'lf or ucLE
t-t!t|!a
th. forrgglng lnrtru!.nt rlr .cknorkdgad baforc r thr'!/(J 6tv oC f i'r',cdt.t l9?7, by John A. Dobaon .r rryor rnd
-tt-r-r-.,
xt. ^r--eF6Ti- clerk of tn€ Torn of vair, r color.do
Iltn!.t ry hand rnd officill sell
r. . Fr_,-i.,.^. -. -._-- c^iy corlaalon erPtre6r r' ' r-. " r" i ! ' . '-' D'i tgfi
ffi
rldta
loill OF VAIL, . Color.dotunlctprl Corpor.t lon
-t-
I
Lffiffifr
E l t {inF r-qtiitru trrrtell|fartr*rft.d:aftr
ocT r5 gn
4ry -/E'-4
It-lrq
t{r-s
r'H ! *i<Fgky::ib!
'$;Pit
-:3s;Fta,,q-va:?:;5<oz6
^zz7);9<45lF!.Otro<b<aqz=>;:z:nH6!;;<a- <dgrrq
- i .. < c
Q> -!a<c:q-t-tt0!<tr<B,t
r€
|-t-Tdf
ll
F
E
IJJ
tclu
z
Fzqt
UJ
UJ
tr
uJc
u
IJJ
J
F
F
ul
<(
o
J
t!
aF
F
F
O
Fz
O
o
z
o
F
z
uJF
o
u,
z
str
!
Er
lll
o
o
z
-ao
Jf
o
cH
q5*)
=
rre
=,
=€F
I
nrr
Vloot
\ t! .\l
=-zo=_44
zA
?
tr
ccoFE9g=>:z:<
urf
>(JFO
-oi
..t
\-
+
zo=_ln
z^
z
troq
9o
^>o;i*a
> (.)
-(\i
r' hJ
rrt
8ss
3
z
F
tr
IJJ
Fo
Fiz
Q
o
zv
o
F{z
z
F,
U
F
z
o
z
!
z
B
a
aF
F
FI
FT
F
z
z
F
o
F
I!
uJ
z
IJJ
z
sc
Fz
uJ
E
llJ
aD
LIJ
tr
L!
cco
J
ut
J
J
F
F
ul
J
II
a
F
F
I
E
tr
ul
o
-l
6.
l*oo
=,2
=ql----f
o
--l
a:
DESIGN REVIEif EOARD
DATE OT T{EETING:
MEI{BERS PRESENT:
SUBJECT:
ACTION TAKEN BY BO
}IOTION
VOTE:
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
ABSTINTION:
APPROVED , , --/
DISAPPIIOVI:D;
SU[ItrlAIiY:
+
DESIGN REVIEI'I BOARD
DATE OIJ IIEETING:
I'IET{BERS PRESENT:
SUBJECT:
ACTION TAKEN BY BOA
MOTION: r
VOTE: FOR:
APPROVIID: I
DI SAPI'ITO\'ID :
ABSTNNTION:
sEcoNDED ev, i )l;/t
AGAINST:
SUlh\IARY:
/
Y qqb
')
V
.|
DATE OT IIEETING:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
SUBJECT:
ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD:
APPROVUD I L---"'-'-
DESIGN REVTE1Y BOAED
ABSTENTION:
/7au^t {) fl 7t" rt/t
i t/. r
MorIoN | /Ul.;fu SECoNDED BY:
AGAINST:VOTE: FOR:
DISAPPIIOYID:
a
DESIGN REVIElY BOARD
DATB OF IIIiETING:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
//Le/,td,!
IIOTION;
VOTE:FOR:
APPROVEDT -1
DISAPPROVIlD:
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
ABSTDNTION:
SUIIIII{ARY:
gH
S"r V-.\*\j
$$a
re Bs
Nw
*96.;*
+
-l
\"D
^J\
clQr- t ti+\l{ .\
dF
C./)
, 1\-
\V>J )t
.Cz\(' if 't
-\_
t
\.\,
)-J
Aw
iR
?r*.*Jt\rSgF
p...\lti-r
g,
oca
:Ed
Ir't\1
,u
l!(+
'J
tJl
tAVI
')
0
-y-lr
f,|/
tY
f\w
n\
^\,t\E
r(r$
a
I
S,n
A
,f
(
-i'r-jn-
o
,
I
F
Y
c,1
.--lri\ltl
F---:
A., Q.i.-r-
.'C. t,,s\!,/ r
L\
Y' {_,
7..---
'-l i
--7'..-->
. /ltl
u, ll
'-rJ \T.\
t) --r-
ii n.i- - '+{
U
r0
)i
t
11,u_
Li$F
\t,
il
Iut;iV
YW!'/
4't1tJt!
Ju
t
h="
lnrn
P. O. Box 1 00
VAIL, COLORADO81657
Date served:
Building
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:
tr uNrFoRM F|RE CODE (U.F.C.) VTOLATTONS tr
tr NATTONAL ELECTRTC CODE (N.E.C.) VTOLATTONS B
tr OTHEB
Vail Fire Department
CORRECTION NOTICE
Date of original inspection:
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PRACTICES
476-2200
476-5613
Ext.223
Building address:
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:
ACTION REOUIRED TO CORBECT VIOLATIONS:
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY:A.M. / P.M. Date:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U.F.C, 1973 EDITION
COPY TO: tr VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
tr WATER & SAN. DEPT.
VAIL POLICE DEPT.
PUBLIC SERVICE
tr PUBLIC WORKSE
tr
BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER:
(Si9natu(e)
(6ignatute)
ol o), .l:/x-t/path
Town of Vail
ELECITRICAL PERIVTIT
f1,
Job Name--.... .........9.,.1...y...(.
Erectricar contractor......B-..-r-.r r :Tt" r r/9& r-.:.:. ... kl:
APPROVALS
N9
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permit Fee
Inspection Fee
Total Fee
Date Paid..--...
Received By--.-.-......--..--.-.
I32
$.............-,-.......... .
$....-......,-......... ...-.
$....-.......................
/i/.-/
a*n:7{-
THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ('1{
JOB SITE DURITG COI{STRUCTIOI{
24 HOURII ADVANCE NOTICE
REQUTRED FOR INSPECTIONS
tra !. r. 80rct(a! !0.. laxvtt latrtl
DATE
.-.fur,t&',.,,-, t
(,/rNsPEcrrdfr
TOWN OF
FIEBUEST
VAIL
TIME RECEIVED
flornen
MON
COMMENTS:
n pnnrrnl. LocATroN
TI IE
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM
I orsneeRovED ! nerNSPEcrD nppRovED
fl uponr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DATE
oo o lou JuN 4 re71
Town of Vail
ELECIRICAL PERMIT O/-!E fu*=
Building Valuation
Ele+trical Valuation
Permit Fee
Inspection Fee
Total Fee
15
$.............-."."..-.. .-
E Za.oo--R
s. -?e-K.
s.... -8-E
* -4€\
N9
DateorApprication.... . G :. 4- :.. 7, 4.........".1e........"
APPROVALS
-Qp*4- J**. 7,*......lllcl&l Date
FORM IS TO EE POSTED ON
SITE DURII{G COI{STRUCTIOT{
24 HOURS ADVAIICE NOIICE
REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
Received ,r.....fl.&.L fu-!.a.ate
Aoo rt Jeil C.*<u7z
tl{l 3. l. lroacrlr ao., !rxYrt r!titr
THIS
JOB
J an ua ry 29 , 1974
Des i gn Rev i ew Boa rd
Town of Vail
Box 100
Vai I, Colorado
Genf lemen:
Th is is to. gua rantee that the emergency roof repa i r and
extension at the 0re Housq will be architecturally
compatible with fh;ming building. lf the Design
Review Board finds that the repairs are not acceptable,
the roof area will be redone after review by the Board
when weather permits.
You rs tru ly,
UCT ION COMPANY
Ruder
KE
dt
obe rt
Recordcd at-.....?.k.2..,..........6'1!r",ck.......... .-i,i,, ..........7..fu....2..r. "1.12.. ..
Reeeption N
Trrts Dnnn, Marle this l"l dny of June , re
bctrveen John P. McBride
of thc
County of Eagle anrl Statc of Cclolarlo, of the first prrt, andRodney E. Slifer and Heather E. Slifer
of the County of Eag le antl State of
Colorado, of the sccond part:
- - -IVITNDSSDTII, That the said part! of the first part, for and in consideration of lhe sunr of TenDollar.s and other good and valuabie consideration - +loLrAB$
to the said part/ of the fir.rt part in hand paid by said parties of t)re second part, the receipt s,hereof is
hcrcby confcsscd and achnorvlcdged, haS grantcd, bargained, sold and conveyed, andby tl'cse prcscnts do€S
grant, b:,r'gain, sell, convcy antl confirm, unto the said palti€S of the second part,theilrirs anrl assigns for-
evcr, all the follo.rvilrg dcscribed lot or lrarcel of lald, situatc, iying and being in the
County of Eag I e and State of Colorado, towit:
TOGIITIIER rvith ail and singular thc heleditarrents and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise
appcrtaining, and the reversion and revcrsions,'remaindel and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all'
'the cstate, right, title, interest, claim and dema-nd rvhatsoever of the said part )/ of the first part, either in law
or equity, of, in and to the above brrgaincd plemiscs, with the here{itamcnts anri nppurr,enances.
TO IIAVI'I
^liD
TO TIOLD the said plcmises above bargaincd and described $-ith the appurtenances, unto the
said parti€s of the second part,Lhe i fireirs anil assigns forever, And the said part/ of the first part,
tbr himsel f, hishei"", executors, anrl administrators, do es covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and
rvith the sai<l pardBS of the secoud partlheihclrs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealin6l and delivery
oi these prcsents, he i s rvell seized o{ the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and
indefeasiblc estate of inhcritance, in larv, in fec simlrle, and haS good right, full power and lawful authority
A portion of Lot c-, Block 5, Vail Village, First. Filing,a subdj-vision in the Town of Vail, CounLy of Eagle, Stiteof colorado described as: Beeinning at -rne mo.Errwest corneof said Lot c which is a poinE of cingenl on the Easterlyline of Bridge Srreeb; thi:nce S 82o23i00'r E 55.06 feet aiont.he Nor:ther:ly line of saicl Lot c: thence S 4oZ2'00" tri I.0gfeet.; thence N 85038'00n W 56.59 feet to a point on a 92.30foot radius curve ruhich is the Easterlv rinb of BridEe strethence 4.50 feet along the arc of said-curve to Ehe iighryhg:S-ggllla_l ?ngle _ia 2047,34,r and rvhose long chord bEarsN 25'17r13'' E 4.50 feet. to the point of beginiing containin148.55 square fee! or 0.0034 acres more or less.
I
;'1
I
J t
to grant, bargain, sell and convey the samc in manncr and lorm as aforesaid, and that the same are lree and clear
from all former and othcr grants, bar.qains, sales, lions, taxes, assessmenl.s and cncumbrances of lqhatever kind ot
noturesocver., excepL for generaL real esbate Laxes for L973, due andpayable in 1974,
and the abovs bargained prcmises in the quitrt and peaceablb possession of the said prr'rtie SLnelf heirs and assigrrs against all and evcrypcrson or persons la*-fully claiming
or any part thereof, the said partf of thc first part shall :urd will WARRANT AND
IN IVITNESS WIIERtrOF, thc said parry of the first part ha S heicunto set
and scal the day and ycar first abovc ryriltcn.
STATE OF COLORADO,
County of Eag 1. e
Tho foregoing instrlmcnt rvas acknorvlcrlrcd73 ,uy John p. McBride
Illy commission explres
of the second part,
or to claim the whole
FONEVOR, DNFEND.his hana
, f! 7 5 . Witncss my hand and official scol.
/') ..- )
/ ), /-/ ,n"7 ./) /1
X . ....-.i.: ,:. .i..................'.....-..',-. :.. : -.t-:, ....(SEAL)
........J.... .-.......... .............(SEAL)
/"t doy of June
l"
bcforc mc this
November 30
No.,1}lt2.rvAltR^N.fY|}ttt|t},_rlrlrl|ltotottr[|'|'iL|l+.o'l|..ttIl|'|fl,r
a--., !r
DEED
THIS DEED made this day of June, 1973, by and
between RODNEY E. SLIFER and HEATHER E. SLIFER of r,he County
of Eagle and State of Colorado, parlies of the first parL,
and JOHN P. McBRIDE of the County of Eagle and State of Colo-
rado, party of the second part;
WITNESSETH, ThaL the said parLies of the firsL part,
for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($f0.00)
and other good and valuable consideration to the said part.ies
of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second
part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged,
do hereby remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM unto
the said party of
assigns forever,
cularly described
A porLion
a
o
5
f Lot b, Block
fol lows :
A porLion of Lot b, Block 5, Vail Village, FirsLFiling, a subdivision in Lhe Town of Vail, Countyof Eagle, State of Colorado, described as:
at the Southwest. Corner of said LoE bpoint of tangent. on the Easterly lineStreet; thence S 82"23t00rr E 55.06 feetSoutherly line of said Lot b to Ehetrue point of beginnirg;_thence conLinuing alongsaid Sourherly line S 82023'00,' E 43.10 fEer ro-
t,he SouEheast Corner of said Lot b; thenceN l3ol5'00tt W 5.35 feet alons the Easterlv lineof said Lor b; Ehence N 82025'00" w 4L.48' feet;
bhenc.e S |o.2ziggrr p 5.01 feet to the true poiniof beginning
TO HAVE AND T0 HOLD the same so long as the party of the
second part, his heirs and assigns own, and so long as said ease-
ment of ingress and egress j-s necessary for Ehe use and enjoy-
ment. of the following described real property:
Lots c, d, €, Block 5, Vail Village, First Filing,a subdivision in the Town of vai1, County of Eagie,State of Colorado;
the second
an easemenL
part, his heirs, suceessors and
for ingress and egress more parti-
Cornrnencing
which is aof Bridge
along the
b1
Logether with all and singular the appurtenances and privi-
leges thereunto belonging or in anywise thereunto appertaining,
and all the estate, right, t.itle, interesL and claim whaEsoever
of the said parties of the firsl parL, either in law or equity,
to the proper use and benefit of the said party of the secorid
parL, his heirs and assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parLies of the first part
have hereunto set Eheir hands and seals the day and year first
above wriLten.
RODNEY E. SLIFER
HEATHER E. SLIFER
Signed, Sealed and Deliveredin Ehe Presence of:
STATE 0F COLORADo )) ss.
COUMY OF EAGLE )
Sworn to and subscribed before me, a Notary Public, by
R0DNEY E. SLIFER and HEATHER E. SLIFER, this _ day of June,
L97 3.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
SEAL
-2-
NOTARY PUBLIC
alcnnnDs ENcrnrrt tNc.,u*url ur-ru u ur-u,
P. O. Bor 6il3
Voil, Colondo 81657
Phcnr {76-5072
Donvc Unr - 244.152t
Sheet 2 of 2
A portlon of Lot b, Brock 5, vall village, First Firing, a subdlvlsionin the Town of vail, county of Eagle, state of colorado, descrlbed as:
Corrmenclng at the Southwest Corner of said Lot, b vhich is a point of tangenton the Eaaterly Line of Brldge streer; thence s 92"23'00" E 55.06 feet aiongthe Southerly line of said LoL b to the t.rue point of beglnning; thence i
continulng along said southerly ltne S 92"23f00" E 43.10 feet to thesoutheast corner of said Lot b; thence N L3"15r00" l{ 5.35 feet aLong theEasterly llne of said Lot b; thence N 82"23100" W 41 .4g feer; thence
S 4o22r00" W 5.01 feet to the true point of beginni.ag.
gap l'lay 22, 1973
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the above
lC ls accurat.e to the best of
legal descriptlon eraa prepared by rne and that
ny knowledge.
Mfu
Regis tered
and Land
Professional
Surveyor No.
-Y / [
,/ ,. A{#;i'i
.v+.'tii r/ { r{ :.,*;,h=xT' \r*,',,,*
-l ; r ---l
| |
:"";r*
|
LEGAL DdSCRIPTJON:Ocna/es fifoa/ Spike
'l
. BCHARDS ENGINEERO|TC. I sunveQ v?-36,
"##3;;' il oo." 4Pri/ z1 tazj
D'nv." Lin''244'r52r
fl gheal / o{ z.\ / tl| '.-'----"--
VI/ / I\. / A A*l i*r'#
A portton of Lot c, Block 5, Vai.1 Vi1lage, First Filing, a srrbdivlsion in the Townof Vall, County of Eag1e, State of Colorado ilescribed as: Beginning at the i.JorthuestCorner of said Lot c rqhi.ch is a point of tangent on the Easterly line of Brldge Street;thence s 82"23'00" E 55.06 feet along the Northerly line of said, Lot c; thencls 4"22'00" trf t.OB feet; thence ll as"5a'00" l'I 55.58 feet ro a poinr on a g2.30 foot radluscurve t'rhLch is the Easterly line of tsridge Street; Ehence 4.50 feeL along the arc of ialdcurve !o the right whose central- angle is 2"47 r34t' and whose long chord lears N 25o17t13"4'50 feet to the point of beglnning ccntaining l-48.55 square feet or 0.0C34 acres riroreor less.
CERTIFICATIO}i:
I eertify ttra t. on
under my supervision,
that bo L.h are aecuraEe
the above date a survey of the properEy as shorrn hereon wag donethat the above plat and legal description were prepared by ne andto the best of my knowledge.
REGISTTRED PROFESSIONAL
AND LAND suRvEyon No.zl
I
,A PPLICATION r.OR BUILDING PE
THE TOWN OF VAIL
licant fill in this section onl
e
RMIT
Building address
Date of A pplication
arrle
.A ddre s s
BUILDING INFORMI TION
New A ddition rz-
-A rea of
Total floor area (sq ttlfu.p*@
No. of stories , Ht.t(l'+?Io
Nc. of rooms
No. of water
Z No. baths -clos ets
No. of FamiliesTeI. No.
co rrect cla ssif ication)
construction I, l[, UI, IV, V
City Tel. No.
I
fi,k
A
Narne
A ddres scity-'sltktr
Name
Address
City
ESTIMATED COST
OF CONSTRUCTION <77{Y
(Mat"ri"Gffif,E,
(Circle
l. Type of
Alteration Repairs
Type of occupancy
.r Lot A$fi BlrD .0 l ^ --n! il+ o; buDclrvlsron l,ta,r,
>.(J
.d
j
oo
0,
tllo
tt
0)o
;{
I
tr
tn
tU
(.1
tro
o
tt
!t
tr
u
l*
s)
o.oc
d
.E
14
{.1q
).{t{
<;
'IJ
d
o
q)
o,
rrtr
o
vl
+,
.!
l{
{)p.
!)
fil
Q
I
a)
u
@
q)
.du
d
F:
\
s\\
.\
&
o
o)
+r
F
k
{)
g
d
o
Eq
Z. Occupancy group A,C, D, E, r., G,
J
INSPECTION RECORD
(f or Departrnental use only)
d
l{o
gl
F
o+,l-l
COMMENTS DATE & SICNATURE
Q
"l(t
lll
d
lr{
tt
d
>.trd
F(),=(D
k
n.
.1
(/)
k
ho
,xo
oo
"a(!
a)
1t
aSli
'x;
6. .9o+JU)d.o>tr@.6?
tt)
g
q)
d
o
tt)
d
C)
Fld
tr
tr(t
o
th
I
J.F..{ lUfiLOto6
d+'
d()
bo +.1c'i.'.. |!dFcdt$ o+r
6. "'E
hO t{Jot{O
Itr ri F^
ts ".i":rgat'443tr
z
C-r
U
hl
|J{('lz
z
Ha
"11-l
ru
t{FI
clg
bo
q
0)+r
(na
.0
F.''
?
l.r
F.rf
rd
Pl
(u
(J
d
.d
INSPECTION APPROV! L
FOUNDATIONS
,.1 '
{9g$
Fr -ru$
H5HF,,i F;E.4 o)
.dQ!
F67#.zu<ie,lop,9
FI,It
Fl
FRAMING
FIN^ L
ROUGH
FINA L
ROUGH
rINAL
ROUCH
FINA L
.J"o
APPLICATION TCIR BUILDING PERMIT
THE TOWN OF VAIL
fill in this scction onl
BUILDING INFCRMA
New Addttioa
O g.A-a L*tt-
hr.t&r,, ,J{4d4
trt
E
Do
&(,
L
aAltcration_f, Re
Type of occupetcy
ctoeete
No, of Families
ESTIMATED COST
OF CONSTRUCTION
BUILDIryC DIMENSICNS , -rTffiffi,*;{"c.W46A#
No of stories I rft.
-rNo. of root,{frx".Tiliil-
*aaa
(t!0o,tl'
(Materirla & Labor)
(Circle
Type of
Occupaaey group A. B. c. D. ii$ c. H. I. J.
igne4
Approval by planning and architectural control committee to obtala building
permit,
Date Stguature
Receipt of Plans Approval of Plane2 sets requiredl Date
mount of Permit }.ee Gheck $Amount of Clean up Fee
Date permit isaued
Check $
Tap fee paid AmountFinal inepection
qo r rect clae eification)
conatructio n \n 6i;LW
Patd: Caah
Patd: Gash
$_
$
Buildiils addrecs
Date of Applic
City lfu[ Tel. No.
City _ILhu^_ Tel. No,
Addrescitylffi
{All parte ^of building)
r.t&a ^ 6 4
Certificate of o
Conatruction clean-up
BUILDING PERMIT
Vail, Colorado
Permit
Permission is hereby granted c/6n
stoTy
A(ldress
In accordance with the provisions set forth by the Vail -s rchitectural Control
COrnrnittee, subject to the rules and regulations as set forth in the Vail Village
Protective Covenants, and in compliance with the 1964 Uniiorm Building Code.
'd'Gt.tt^ L
C ontra ctc r
l pproved
Vail Building InspecEr
INSPECTION RECORD
(for Departrnental use only)
D"t. ,42. ut* ?* tg{L
z
Type of Construction -E t / 16r.
DATE & SIGNATUP-E
.<'
r5
90h
f.'.
(d
o
ti-l
OUND.A.TIONS
RAMING
FINAL
ROUGH
FINAL
ROUGH
AL
ROUGH
g)
FINAL
&n/.y&j,
APPLICATION FCR BUILDING PERIvIIT
THE TOWN OF VAIL
(Applicant fill in this section only)
Building address
Date of Application
Address
City Tel. No.
Address E. E_x lLFjClty 4ll,eqt , Tet. No.C2,f
^3gL-
BUILDINC INFORMATION
k
t
B
U
l.r{
ud
u
"l
Alteration Repairs
Type of occupancy
eui-PiNc ou\aqNslq5s
fotaf ifJ"" area ( sq ft)---_---
Narne 4le u-No. of wate r clos ets
Addre s s
Tel. No. f- .- t Pt ///4\ u, F No, of Families
.lLot
g6[Btocti
tgl Subdivision
:H I
(Circle
l. Type of
Signed
(Pe
Apptoval by planning and architectural control committee to obtain building
permit.
Date Signature
No of stories--Ht'._
No. of rooms No' baths.,*.
ESTIMATED cosr .., 42-
cF CONSTF.UCTTON,.F clto
-
(Materiale & Labor)
_Egil.,p$r_q4lsgF*cIIqNReceipt of plans * - App"orral of plans
(2 sets reouired).*-*--t o";;
-Drt.f,
- a6'Amount of Permit Fee $ / Paid: Caah $€ttect $:,5'-
Amount of Clean up Fee $
-
Paid: Cash fChect S-
Date perrnit issued
Final inspection
Tap fee paidl Amount
Certificate of o"iif,iiEf U coipliar"e
(All parts of building)
Construction clean- uP
,
BUILDING PERMIT
Vail, Coiorado (
Perrnit tat" ,Iz+& 4 19 tz
11 q
Perrnission is hereby grunt"d 9.&t V-q-*
as /&bt*u to &afurzf u sto ry
/ ddre s s
In accordance with the provisions set forth by the Vail
Comrnittee, subject to the rules and regulations as set
Protective Covenants, and in cornpliance with the 1964
Type oI Construction -E Group
1. rchitectural C ontrol
forth in the Vail Village
Uniform Building Code.
f aa,4
c o,,t'ucto,-24q4( f 72&--
.ir pproved
Vail Building Inspecto
INSPECTICN RECORD
(For Departrnental use Only)
INSPECTION ,\ PPROV} L COMMENTS DATtr & SIGNr'TURE
FOUNDATIONS
FRIMINC
bt)
,
g.l FINAL
ROUGHUo
I'l
FIN,^ L
ROUGH
bo
b
E
-.{
o FIN3 L
ROUGH--
o()
o
FIN.^ L
i{ r ' ,-,i
i{!'.'- [-.- il
,.L'i,"l.-I'''"'V" /, /,'l b
t'
THE
February 24, L969
/inr\.7flJJ!taJ(I,
VAIL
INC.
COLORADO 81657
q
I
ti
Mr. F. Blake Lynch
Town of VailVail, Colorado 91657
Dear Blake:
The Gallery is considering revamping the frontar faceof the Gallery Building lhis summer. As you know,our front steps are made of redwood and haire depreciatedconsiderable over the last three years. we would riketo pour an attractive concrete stair and deck. we wouldalso like to. examine the possibilities of extending ourexisting deck out on to the easement approximately 24"_36". we wourd r-ike to also extend the ieck approiimately36" on the north side of the exi-sting deck frbm the Kiva.
our plan now is to carry a simirar theme as the McBrideclock Tower extension with landscapting and natural rock.We will submit drawings of the extensi5n in the nearfuture for counsel consideration..
Sincerely yours,
tL/
{, '.-t ( t[ fcl^ .r| ,rt":7'L-t'\"-.
Deane L. Knox
DLK:mec
t-4.r'1, (cf.'et fi.tr*:NQi1i rt*tI
elr I af ,fa't f'$ c
BUILDING PERMIT
Vail, Colorado
Date Septernber 9,19 68
Permit
Perrnis sion is
as Owner
hereby g rante d
addto a one sto ry
Addition on The Gallery. Inc.
f ddr"ss Lot A, Block 5, Vail V olorado
In accordance with the provisions set forth by the Vail /'rchitectural Control
Cornrnittee, subject to the rules and regulations as set forth in the Vail Village
Protective Covenants, and in compliance with the 1964 Unif o rrn Building Code.
Tvpe of C onst ruction Group
Contractor
l,pproved
Vail Buildins Ins
INSPECTION RECORD
(For Departrnental use Only)
INSPECTION
FOUNDATIONS
.\ PPROVS L COMMENTS DATE & SIGNATURE
FRA MING
bo
il FINA L
ROUGHUo
14 FINT L
ROUGH
bt;
J
l-r,FINT\ L
ROUGH
u0
d
tn
FIN.^ L
BUILDING PERMIT
Vail, Colorado
Date Scptcmber 9,.^ 68tv
Pe rrnit
Pe rrnis sion is
as Owncr
hereby granted Gallcry, Iac.
add anGto story
Additton The Gallery, Inc.
f ddress Lot A. Block 5, Vatl Villagc Firet Filtng, Bridgc Stroct, Vall, Colorado
on
In accordance with the
C ornrnittee, subject to
Prote ctive Covenants.
T'ype of C onstruction
C ont ra cto r D. L. Knox
provisions set forth by the Vail
the rules and regulations as set
and in cornpliance with the 1954
Group
I rchitectural Control
forth in the Vail Village
Uniforrn Building Code.
A pproved
Vail Building Inspector
INSPECTION RECORD
(For Departmental use Only)
INSPECTION .\ PPROV,A L COMMENTS DATE & SIGNI^TURE
FOUND.\TIONS
FRl MING
h0
A
E
F-{FINAL
ROUGH
FIN.^ L
ROUGH
€)
14
;
a'1
FINA L
ROUGH
bo
+,
(d
qJ
(r)
:
FIN/\ L
THE GALLERY, INC.
vAIL, C0LORAD0
8L657
September 8, 1968
Mr. Blake Lynch
Town Coordinator
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado
Dear Blake:
Enclosed you will find the plans and a check for a buildlngpermit for the Gallery addition and Gallery storage.
These plans have been basically approved by the Vail Archi-tectural Control Comnission.
S incerely ,fu4-/
Deane L. Knox
DLK:mec
Enclosures
u,oi
1
n
{,
e
2
ri
{,
a,
v,
I
7,'-
Lflr\L{
{
V
'YA
it
LJ
-J_J
<t
$j,l
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
1.
(',i :
',lr i!lu iilL r
ihI
.jr
i
illlj|l
rlll
;lilit illit
lfi il
t8 il
l', ll
tjiltil
r.llstl
-ilo llf,l
J
'l0il
-tl
;ilvrl
rl
fil
sll'il
qll
rj, ll7tl
iilbIl
r,), il I
ji
i;
J
jir
i{j
l1l
ii
J
J
$
]u
{r
vr
I
\-'
:.
';il
;i rit
',.
!tlj
lr'It!llii
Ii
li
j1
l!'
l;t.
;
:,
Cr
z
ri
ii
0
P
,
1
0
T
fr
i
u_
0
Url
3
t-.
w
I
:
i
I
s
$[tf
rgg(I_
fluiY'l
frnrb?
sgl;;
, tiJ
r/f
{;
nff
'J
t-
ttI
v
"i &,s*: "9
e^Ai
;4*
.i: i /
"do7-7
"il;iy? ull5i9l
fi,|, ;;"l
$1l
.C
$t d'rn,{SI -lU:E!,
qf
tr-
v)z*
{tur',1t'^
\s
d
f.j
T>v lllll. t!
0Jo-
!l
i .l!iI.il
',
1
t'l
1 trJir
t-u
:f))otZ
Jr
i
.
r4il
oQr0(
u
l:
t-
V
u.l
{
tt
!J
4
( ir'
(r-
7
j.a,q!
f,vt.:T
Au.
4
u
<l
q
r.l]
4l
i/t
fl
i
d
v
It
r)L),
I
f
1
a-hIg,
iF
yr
E-.
#l?lr*tlFr! ;-'{l
;T
'Y5o' ti'rl --.,.1.
:oj':
!ou' t5-
ta
'\ L-\(n
\9{a
!, :,u. lJd li-i
)(rx
'J tr _.
li ur i;
S r.1 0.r
Ir
fiIl-
r)-\l
u
s\lN
S or\ rl
- ol
u
6a
l:t>y0x
fr6
*cv,-.Y <I
-,?
FP
o- 00ct \)9'a'.
a(
t
,'!,t
z,
.ul
0/
4
0.
0ao
,{
fl
U
7
v
Jqq
fr
$.t- I$;{ nuiIri* i
llil ii'ilil
llrlt{j
It
Fts
o
Itl
-2.
aFyl
fr1l
htrl
tll l
It
7.9,
t- lf
$g{tIOx,J
ulp
F
dt
A
U
0
t
rFe
4Fl
d'.,,,ri:"."'/ /r"'r ./ /'
IF
'f
4,"Jrt
"f
-,v
or'A ii
{-.
\Jt 71- ?:
,:,; l'{ i
u .,+qN741
::
Lt
ij']
I
I
jn4
i.t' gi
-{. tJ
l
l. rfl'L- i,iLi "'l
' lrir\ 1'/- iiiO r'iI!Ir-n^()#rA--{
,rt i tt
p
t!'t F
.:i -t-
r.l
l'1
vl,
*;*|
{\Il\trrrl
11,<j
*-^i
U\rr.-4l'lr
{J,
tl
.r $
:li:l/t
tll,-*lr'/,1*F*it t]
e
i-ilr * |
u*i-r r\ ;"iLt I"J di
p (lr rilrJ!*
L n *;;. '={
U tt /'Ll u, dl-r > i.t]
'J-z F"z: rr. -:;f{;rtUI- ., U /!{.1 ttj I7 2 >n4
LlVnl
- J F{* ,\n ,kulQ * "lrV 4IJo,"gon l- J^L] N N\J<:dr
:
:
{Fr
l
f t;
LR-}
r.f\
t
"a'{1.
'-iri
{'\',
1-.
{\r.-ia
pt/
t' l:/ tili4lw
"hOJA
ru-iU'! <1
q ry,Ul ,l \.tr-|I'r
ait
n
,'' vlrr l[e!.
{:t t1. -t-
,.'>
Fg
X 1.1.iir. Jt:[1"
,\ '-Lil {r.
It-ul
. tlr rw;i.h- : -
d xL
t, "L
tr' l. !.^ ril ;-tt 1, i
_iI-'
\I-e 1
-\-
\j'
$
!4'F-
a
AGREEMENT
THrs AGREEMENT is made *is / / /, aay
1965r by and between RODNEY E. SLIFER (Sf,ffnR)
a Colorado corporation {GALLERY).
/,4 t; o, /;t ,r-of iAugr*€tr(Z\
and CTALLXRY, INC.,
WITNESSETH:
Whereas, GALLERY is the owner of a certain parcel of
land situate in Eagle County, Colorado, described as follows:
Lot a Block 5 and a part of Tract B,
VaiI Village, First Filing.
upon which it will construct a building; and
Whereas, SLIFER is the Lessee of a certain parcel of
land sit,uate in Eagl-e County, Colorado, described as follows:
I-rot b Block 5. Vail Village, First Filing
upon which he wilL const.ruct a buildi_ng; and
Whereas the said buildings shall be constructed adjacent
to each other in such a manner that the said buildings shall have
a common roof line;
NOW, TIIEREFORE, in consideration of the sun of One
Dollar ($f-.00) and other good and val-uable consideration paid by
each to the other, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
acknowled.ged, and of the mutual covenants and conditions herein-
after set forth, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. GALLERY and SLIFER working through their respective
architects shall coordinate with each other in the design and
construction of the buildings so that the roofs of said buildings
may be readily and easily connected one to the other during
construction.
2. GAITLERY and SLIFER shal1 each have the right, at its
or his o\^tn expense, to connect the roof of their building to the
roof of the otherrs building and in furtherance of such right to:
a. attach to the other building such roof joists
and other structural or non-structural members of his or its
building as may be necessary, desirable or convenient in the
opinion of the architects of the respective buildings to permit
the construction of the roof of his or its own buildinq.
b. to drill such holes and drive such nails,
spikes, scre\^rs and bolts in the otherts building as may be neces-
sary to attach the roof of his or its building to the roof of the
other's building or to use such other methods as may seem appro-
priate for such purpose; and
c. to attach to the roof of the other's building
such gut,t,ers, drains, electric heat tapes, equipment and other 'l
devices as may be required by the design of his or its building.
3. Each agrees to indemnify the other from, and to
hold hin or it harmless ag'ainst, any and all damage which he or
it or his or its agents or independent contractors retained by
him or it may do to the other's building in the course of the
attachment of the roofs of the buitdings.
4. Each shall not impair the structure of the otherrs
building by the attachment of the roof of his or its building
to the roof of the other's building.
5. This Agreement shall not be deemed to require
either party to maintain the building to be located on his or
its property.
-2-
o
6. Each party shall be solely responsible for the
maintenance and repair of the portion of the roof on his or its
property- In the event of damage or need of repairs to Che portion
of the roof covering the portion of the building where the properties
of the parties join, then the cost of such necessary repairs or
replacement shall be shared equally by the parties.
7. SLIFER shalt protect GALLERY against any damage
which it may sustain by reason of snow or rain or other d.rainage
problems created by the attachment of the Slifer building roof to
the Gallery building roof -
8. GALLffi.Y hereby grants to SLIFER the right to alter
at a later date Sl"ifer's building by the construction of an
addition thereto which will extend southerly and will connect with
and become a part of Sliferts building and will connect with and
become a part of the roof of slifer's buildinq which is attached to
the roof of Ga}lery's building, and agrees to enter into such agf,e€-,.r
ment as may be required to effect the intent of the parties that
SLIFER be entitled to construct an addition to Slifer's building.
9- This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and
be binding upon the heirs. personal representatives, successors
and assigns of the parties hereto.
GA.LT,ERYT INC.
-3-
b'.ici iJ'-rnr,/i,-t-