HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5 LOT C D E GORSUCH BUILDING AKA CLOCK TOWER MCBRIDE DRB LEGAL7
/*//r//r7o
t'&-ha -Z'
fne,aC4eGt?///UA",zqo,Je(l*toooo
b.P,E Ht&'/u'
1t
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
DepartTent of Crmmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Prctect Name; Ore House DRB Number: DRB030110
Project Description:
Plastic awning
Participants:
OWNER GORSUCH LTD-MCBRIDE,JOHN04lL4l2003 Phone:
263 E GORE CREEK DR
VAIL CO
81657
License:
APPLICANT Larry Anderson 04.lt4l2003 Phone: 476-5100
232 Bridge Street
Vail, CO
81657
License:
Project Address: 253 E GORE CREEK DR VAIL Loca6on:
Ore House 232 Bridge Street
Legal Description: LoH C, D Block 5 Subdlvlsion: VAIL ULLAGE FILING 1
Parcel Number: 210108229003
Comments: overturned DRB decision
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Moffet Action: APPROVED
Second By: Jewitt
Vote: 6-1 DateofApprovalt 0710712003
Conditions:
Cond: CON0005983
The plastic awnings cannot be used during ski season
Planner: Allison Ochs DRB Fee Paid: S25O.OO
V+. b-\
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Dnn
MEMORANDUM
Town Gouncil
Community Development Department
July 1, 2003
ilt.
An appealof the Design Review Board decision to deny DRB03-0110, a
final review ol proposed awnings at the Ore House, located at 232 Bridge
StreeVLot D, Block 5, Vail Village lstFiling
Appellent: Larry AndersonPlanner: Allison Ochs
SUBJECT PROPERW
The subject property the Ore House Restauranl and Bar, located at 232 Bridge Street /
Lot D, Block 5, Vail Village 1st Filing. The property is zoned Commercial Core l.
STANDING OF APPELLANT
The appellanl has standing 1o file an appeal as the owner of the Ore House.
REOUIRED ACTION
The Town Council shall uphold, ovenurn, or modify the Design Review Board's denial
of DRB03-0110, a |inal review of proposed awnings at the Ore House, located a|232
Bridge SlreeUlot D, Block 5, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to
make findings of tact in accordance with the Vail Town Code:
The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based
directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must
support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the
requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12) have or have not been
met.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The applicant, Larry Anderson, submitted an application to erect clear plastic awnings
which roll up into the existing deck awning at the Ore House Bar and Reslaurant.
Pictures of the awnings have been attached for reference (Attachment A). The
application was in response to an enforcemenl letter sent by the Community
Development Department for erecting the clear plastic awnings without design approval.
This letter has been attached for reference (Attachment B).
tv.
v,BACKGROUND
On May 21, 2003, the Design Review Board denied the proposed awnings at the Ore
House. The denial was due to a 2:2 tie of the Design Review Board which, according to
procedure, constitutes a denial of a proposal. The applicant, Larry Anderson,
representing the Ore House, submitted an appeal of the Design Review Board's May 21,
2003, decision. The appeal has been attached for reference (Attachment C). The
applicant stated that his appeal is based on the benefit the clear plastic awnings provide
during bad weather.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Guidelines:
1. Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with
Vail's environment. lt is not to be infened that buildings must look alike to be
compatible. Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of scale,
proportions, site planning, landscaping, mateials and colors, and compliance with
the guidelines herein contained.
Staff Response: Staff believes that the proposed materials are incompatible with the
existing structure and the environment. Specifically, staff does not believe that the
clear plastic awnings meet the intent of this guideline. Previous applicalions for clear
plastic awnings have been denied, based on non-compliance with the Town of Vail
Design Guidelines. Staff believes that approving them in this situation, regardless of
lrequency of use, will set a precedence for these types of proposals. The
proliferation of the clear plastic material will have a negalive impact on the Town of
Vail.
Urban Design Guide Plan:
1. Pedestrianization - A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian
circulation through an interconnected network of safe, pleasant, pedestrian ways.
Staff Response: Staff believes that the proposed clear plastic awnings create too
much of a streel enclosure and intrudes into the openness of the streetscape, making
the pedestrian circulation less pleasant.
2. Decks and Patios - Dining decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bing
people to the streets, opportunities to look and be looked at, and generally contribute
to the liveliness of a busy street - making a richer pedestrian experience than if those
slreefs were empty.
A review of successful decks/patios in Vail reveals several common characteristics:t Direct sunlight from 11:00 - 3:00 increases use by many days/year and protects
from windo Elevated 3 to 5 feet to give views into the pedestrian walk (and not the reverse). Physical separation trom pedestrian walk of 10 to 1 2 ft. (planter befter than a wall). Overhang gives pedestrian scale/shelter
Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to: sun, wind,
views, and pedestrian activities.
vt.
Staff Resoonse: Staff believes that the intent of outdoor dining decks is to provide
interest to the street. By enclosing this space with clear plaslic awnings, the interest
to the street is lost. Some outdoor dining decks or portions of dining decks have been
permanently enclosed, i.e. Pepi's, Red Lion, and a deck on the creekside at Sweet
Basil. All of these permanent structures have been subject to site coverage,
setbacks, elc. The Design Review Board stated that some of these deck enclosures
have negatively impacted the pedestrian experience in Vail.
3. Accent Elements - The life, and festive quality of the Village is given by judicious use
of accent elements which give color, movement, and contrast to the Village.
Colortd arcent elements consistent with existing character arc encouraged, such as:
. Awnings and canopies -canvas, bight color or stripes of two colors.. Flags, banners - hanging from buildings, poles, and even across sfreets
for special occasions.. Umbrellas -over tables on outdoor dining decks.c Annual color flowers - in beds or in planters.. Accent lighting - buildings, plazas, windows, trees (even Christmas lights
ail winte\.o Painted wall graphics -coats of arms, symbols. Accent compositions, etc.o Fountains - sculptural, with both winter and summer characteristies.
Staff Response: The Vail Village Design Considerations encourages the use of
awnings, canopies, and umbrellas over tables on ouldoor patios. The use of plastic is
discouraged.
Vall Village Master Plan
Goal 1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural
scale of the village in order to sustain ifs sense of community and identity.
Staff Resoonse: The Design Review Board and staff believe that the proposed awning
is of character within the architectural scale of the Village. The proposal does not meet
the intent of Goal 1 of the Vail Village Master Plan.
Goal 3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking expeience
throughout the Village
3.3 Encourage a wide variety of activities, events, and street life along pedestrian
ways and plazas.
3.3.2 Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and shall be enmuraged in
commercial infill or redevelopment projects.
Staff Resoonse: Staff feels that the currenl proposal does not meet the intent of Goal 3
of the Vail Village Master Plan. As proposed, the outdoor deck simply becomes
"enclosed" soace.
VII. STAFFRECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Departmenl recommends that the Town Council upholds
the Design Review Board's denial of the proposed clear plastic awnings at the Ore
House Bar and Restaurant, located at 232 Bridge StreeUlot D, Block 5, Vail Village 1st
Filing subject to the following findings:
1. That the proposal does not meet the intent of the guidelines as established by
Section 12-11-5 (Design Guidelines) of the Town Code and outlined in Section V
of this memorandum.
2. That the proposal does not meet the intent of the guidelines as established by
the VailVillage Urban Design Guide Plan and as outlined in Section V of this
memorandum.
Should the Town Council choose to overturn the Design Review Board's denial of the
request, the Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council
also direct staff to amend the Design Guidelines to allow for this malerial,
VIII. AfiACHMENTS
A. Photos ol proposed awningsB. Enforcement Letter, dated March 6, 2003C. Appeals Form, received May 30, 2003D. Final Agenda of Design Review Board meeting of May 21,2003
7a
l't
-o
E
()
(u
P
g:x*-"
-- --\-
Ar'
?4"'k ",-
S&*
-",", ;i
- .t f'
.l'!l.it|i,?\;lf r'r,? i
o
o
o
o
FlL E 00Py
March 6,2003
Ore House
John Beaupre
232 Bridge Street
Vail CO 81657
CERTIFIED MAILRETURN RECEIPT REQTJESTEI)
Re: Unapproved exterior alteration, illegal sign displayed
Dear Mr. Beaupre:
One of the many functions of Code Enforcement is to provide for the enforcement of the Town of
Vail Municipal Codes.
It has come to our attention that the above-described property may be in violation ofthe Town of
Vail Municipal Codes as follows:
Reported Violation(s): You have placed plastic cwtains arotmd your dining deck You
also have a daily special bomd being placed out in violation of the Sign Code.
Section I2-l l-3 (DESIGN APPROYAL) of the Town Code states, in part, that:
1 2- 1 I -3 : DESIGN APP ROYAL:
A. Scope: No person shall commence removal of vegetation, site
preparation, building cowtruction or demolition, dumping of material
upon a site, sign erection, aderinr alteration or enlargement of an
existing structure, pning, fencing or other improvements of open space
within the corporate limits of the Town unless design approval has been
gTanted as prescribed in this Chapter. The addition of plmt materials to
existing landscaping, gardening and landscape maintenance shall be
exempt from thk provision.
We are asking that you remove these curtains and no longer display the unapproved daily special
board, Failare to do so will result in a summons being_ksued.
Attachment: B
Your prompt attention regarding this matter will be geatly appreciated and will help assure that
Vail continues to be the desirable and pleasant resort community for which we all strive. Please
feel free to call me with any questions, comments or concgms you may have. My office phone
number is 97 0-477 -3417 .
Very Truly Yours,
David Rhoades, Code Enforcement Officer
Community Development Department
Appeals Form
__ Depaftment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vaii, Colorado 81G57
tel: 970.479.2t39 faxi 970.479.2452
web: www.ci,vail:co.us
General fnformation:
This form is required for filing an appeal of a staff, Design Review Board, or planning and Environmentalcommission action/decision' A complete rorm ano associated requirements must be submitted to thecommunity Development Department within ten (10) business days of the disputeo action/decision.
Action/Decisiol being appealed:
Date of Action/Decision:
Board or Staff person rendering actidn/decision:
Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land? (yes)
Phone!
Physical Address in Vail:
Legal Description of Appellant(s)
If yes, are you an adjacent propefi o,wnerf (yes[no)
Nameof Appellant(s): ( /r-.' \*J-ut ? t )*,
Maiting Address: 1}a; ?,..;A.r-,, {.-,r-
{ *,-'.
Submittal Requirements:1' On a separate sheet or TParate sheets of paper, provide a detailed explanation of how you are an"aggrieved or adversely affected person,,.2' on a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, speciff the precise nature of the appeal. please
cite specific code sections having rerevance to the action being appealed.3' Provide a list of names and addresses (both mailing and phftic;i addresses in vail) of all owners ofproperty who are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including ownerswhose propefties are separated from the subject property by a'right-oFway, stream, or otherintervening barrier).4' Provide stamped, addressed envelopes for each property owner risted in (3.).
Appellant(s) Signature(
For Office Use
Date
Lot:_Block:
t*tt*t' iu itt or if more space is required).
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM AND ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS TO:
TOWN OF VAIL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAil., COLOMDO 81557.
\,EB
2003Planner:
Attachment: C
RECE
Ore {House
232 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
(97O) 476-s1OO
J=h< e\J\--+*-',i s h^^'.- t-*^. i n p'\o"a o,""\ .;
\^s€- {o"- a- \.\u-\'^"!t4-- -*Q 7eA-'rs. .-"\L \ atso\..^\tt7 *:
cct-"'p\o..-'.\: -[\^. €-'r'-\*';J o-'nq i^f,'*?-;^*t:'Aqc'c\tJ$"i:?' .7^ o-.*'1*:; l:'.,'^:i :*-- -:z-;*' -
-€-r- c-\,.rs i o-e-\.f i ^ {L.- Ji!r'vr'\t4' €n , :$na--t i s- v-' c)
W t-.\<,'- \-\ s € .
-TL,. G-rr.-\"".l-,c .)€*y .^.*tf,.. t.''.{'+ dr'r'v^
g,r,r.*.n-'e.- \.^.',-.-,0*- ^-\ A rJ-r- Lt* * ' ''.c ss . ,\t/ 4c e
a.3ceaf b",*-o-{;+ {a lr\^. tJ'i\ 3:'t *'t-a:i-,-.
h a-l s\. *.- ,i.9 +\^* su'Y'\v1-e' r {o <-r3d 7 *l " o'.tc\dcrr{
ar.-a\ ti^. Af,.a g'ue''\ t4 trct''"' Ao=t /^o{ L'--"* \a
9c.rrr'- y &o'- cc) ':e'r '
h *f" "^^' t JJ [" o$ \^ ts o '
;;:
-Zt^.*,
6t"" '\ Lcv-t -s '-"o."^" <n .,$"- L.-L ' t'
o--*ri-\r^*i a*{5..,o-- *..$.':5. Tb.-l t-^*:'+ +LTc^^"^
o.q U':\ f,.-.^^^ c\ soLs {^*- 'p;"Pu^'; - -fl"n v^"\c/ra
b-..ine.ss it". - O'" S*t. cc'}'^ A\ t Jo': 1)t-
,=['"-ro '
*L. h^ ar e- +L. L*^^*'t{t \" \L'* {c\"' r s' q\q g -}c*<'
\) o\\ <ux.'-) ?/ -g-V *\ ' '-'ll c '..\et \t" Ft t v\\t{ \ F- e'"}'
i s *)^e vlTtl\:fr "{ 4I.." t-,-*.)i *r cdl"^r'*"^: \) ", \f "
€,wa\cr.*r. -^\)'*L-o^^* "!\^^\ ...i''ti\i! a"'o\ c-\ea-\y
l^ €U€^n.-r.eL,
-TLu. .r-qr*\\< t$ fL.e n^.art v-<-<-+'^-\ --Fa'^^ 4
I ( , \. I -- '.--,o -,.-,b ! rr-',--a t'* €.(ryr ggr r'-
\5-,.^." fi\ QvQra <tv'r_
'. il
il
,ii
..i*
r,s:.:.8't
".,{,l
:ir.
'4
,i;
,,-ffi
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Communlty Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
te/: 970.479.2139 fax| 970.479.2452
web: wwwci.vail,co. us
Project Name: Ore House DRB Number: DR8030110
Project Descriptionr
Plastic awning
Participants:
OWNER GORSUCH LTD - MCBRIDE, JOHN04|L4|ZO03 phone:
263 E GORE CREEK DR
VAIL CO
81657
Licnse:
APPUCANT LarryAnderson 04/t412003 Phone:476-5100
232 Bridge Street
Vail, CO
81657
License:
Projed Address: 263 E GORE CREEK DR VAIL l-ocation!
Ore House 232 Bridge Street
tegal Descriptionr Lot! C, D Block 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE RUNG 1
ParcelNumber: 210108229003
Comments: AppllcaUon failed due to 2:2 tie
BOARD/STAFF ACTTON
Motion By! Action: DENIED
Second By:vote: Date ofApprovalt
Conditions:
Cond: CON0005887
The awnings must be removed by no later than July 1, 2003, if no appeal of this
decision is filed.
Planner: Allison Ochs DRB Fee Paid: $250.00
T-{61 P.002 F-S69' Apr-08j03 0l:57Pnr From-T0lll{
;'..TfiHtr1#f'",..:{;r !1ng*:xx'"i::fJ:1#if#,t'ffigf'lx1l3jfll5'"FjJ'E!friffi,: Ar pro]ects requrnns ,i=-.y:|tfr;ti;.-.fr;frr*,j['r.aner*bl mat is.
Fftt: PF..*tFll?'ir *;,,i;..r inr.im;riorr r$-recerved bv tne
tr
P
tr
:Phone:;
Apr-08j03 0l:57pr From-T0[l'l 0F VA|I|IUNITY DEVEtOPlEtlT
,r*m
L Orint name
descriPtion)
provide this letter as written aPproval of the plans dated
beensubmittedtotheTownofVaitcornmunityDevehpmentDeparunentfortheproposedimprovements
tobecomp|etedattheaddressnotedabove'IunderstandthattheproposedimprovemenLsinc|ude:. I n ,\^. ;r-. -riit uQ-t.;
IfurtherUnderstandthatminormodificationsmaybemadetothep|ansoverthecouGeofthereview
process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations'
a joint owner of proPerty located at (address/legal
k -i);
which have
9701792452 T-484 P.003/013 F'868
JOINT PROPERTYOWNER'
WRITTEI{ APPROVAL LETTER
Page 2 of 7zl02lo7lo7
Apr-08:!3 0l :58rm Fron'T0lll{ 0F VA!l'lul||lTY DEVEL0PI'II|T
Roof
Siding
O$rer Wall Matenlals
Fascia
5offits
Wndows
Window Trim
Doors
DoorTrim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
ChimneYs
Tmsh Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Lighting
s70179?45?T-181 P.007/013 F-969
ColoI
C \..*-- .
Exterior
@
Notes:
Please specify the manufachJrer's name' the color name and number and attach a color chip'
PROPOSEO MATERIAI-5
Page 6 of ].2l12lo7loz
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Design Review Board
Community Development Department
May 7, 2003
Ore House request for review of the clear plastic curtains to enclose the
out door dinino deck
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Design Review Board
deny DRB03-0010, a minor alteration at 232 Bridge Street, to allow for the addition of
clear plastic curtains at the Ore House subject to the following findings:
1. That the proposal does not meet the inlent of the guidelines as established by
Section 12-11-5, Design Guidelines, and Title 14, Vail Town Code.
2- That the proposal does not meel the intent of the guidelines as established by
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
ln addition, the Design Review Board has denied similar applications which involved this
plastic window material, including proposals at Haagen Daz, Sweet Basil, Campo di
Fiori, stating in all cases that "clear plastic" is not an acceptable building material in the
Town of Vail.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUTDELINES
Design Guidelines:
1. Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with
Vail's environment. lt is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be
compatible. Conpatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of scale,
proportions, site planning, landscaping, mateilals and colors, and compliance with
the guidelines herein contained.
Urban Design Guide Plan:
1. Pedestrianization - A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian
circulation through an interconnected network of safe, pleasant, pedestrian ways.
2. Decks and Patios - Dining decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bring
people to lhe streefs, opportunities to look and be looked at, and generally contribute
to the liveliness o/ a busy street - making a richer pedestrian experience than if those
slreels were empty.
A review of successlul decks/patios in Vail reveals several common characteristics:. Direct sunlight from 11:00 - 3:00 increases use by many days/year and protects
from wind
. Elevated 3 to 5 feet to give views into the pedestrian walk (and not the reverse). Physical separation from pedestrian walk of 10 to 12 ft. (planter better than a wall). Overhang gives pedestrian scale/shelter
Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to: sun, wind,
vi ews, ped e stri an activities.
3. Accent Elements - The life, and festive quality of the Village is given by judicious use
of accent elements which give color, movement, and contrast to the Village.
Colorful accent elements consistent with existing character are encouraged, such as;
. Awnings and canopies - canvas, bright color or stripes of two colors.. Flags, banners - hanging from buildings, poles, and even across sfreels
for special occasions.. Umbrellas - over tables on outdoor dining decks.. Annual color flowers - in beds or in planters.. Accent lighting - buildings, plazas, windows, trees (even Christmas lights
allwinter).t Painted wall graphics -coats of arms, symbols. Accent compositions, etc.. Fountains - sculptural, with both winter and summer characteristics.
Vail Village Master Plan
Goal 1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural
scale of the village in order to sustarn ifs sense of community and identity. .
Goal 3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience
throughout the Village
3.3 Encourage a wide variety of activities, events, and street life along pedestrian
ways and plazas.
3.3.2 Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and shall be encouraged in
commercial infill or redevelopment projects.
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: Gorsuch Remodel
Project Description:M inor exterior alteration
Owner, Address and Phone: David & Renie Gorsuch
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Tom Frye, Resort Design Collaborative lnternational, 1000
South Frontage Road, Vail, Co. 81657
Project Street Address: 263 Gore Creek Drive
Legal Description. Lots c, d, e & f, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing
Parcel Number: Building Name:
Comments: Amended Approval (lUA2/98) of cedar shake rooling shingles
Motion by: Pierce
Seconded by: Woldrich
Vote: 5-0
Conditions:
See PEC conditions
Board / Staff Action
Action: approved
Town Planner:
Date:
F:\tlvliRYONE\DRB\APPROVT\l li98\GORSt.rCIJ.7 I7
DRB Fee Pre-Paid:
oo
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: Gorsuch Remodel
ProjectDescription: Minorexterioralteration
Owner, Address and Phone:David & Renie Gorsuch
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Tom Frye, Resort Design Collaborative International, 1000
South Frontage Road, Vail, Co. 81557
Project Street Address: 263 Gore Creek Drive
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Lots c, d, e & f, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing
BuildingName:
TownPlanne r, fL..-3 -Q.uJr,rDate: lln nA
F:\EVERYONE\DR3\APPROVAL9t\ I DRBAPPR.FRM
Motion by: Pierce
Seconded by: Woldrcih
Vote: 5-0
Conditions:
See PEC conditions
Board / Staff Action
Action: approved
DRB FeePre-Paid: FS-D. --
TOTyN OFVAIL
CENERAI.INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring approval by thc Pl:urning and Environmcntal Comnrission. For spccific
information. scc thc subnrittal rcquircmcnts for thc particular approval that is rcqucstcd. Thc application can not bc
Itcccptcd until all rcquircd infornration is subnrittcd. Thc projcct nray also nccd to bc rcvicwcd by thc Torvn Council
nd./or thc Dcsign Rcvicw Board.
A.. TYPEOFAPPLICATION:,,
. tr Additional GRFA (2s0) , itl Bcd and Brlakfasttr Conditional Usc Pcrmittl Major or El Minor Subdivisiontr Rczoning
tr Sign Variancc
D Variancctr ZoningCodcAmcndmcnt
B.DESCRTPTTON OF THE REQUEST:*t\tO AL
o
Pl'1,
Qucsrions? | rtrc Planning Suff at 479-?.118
I CATI O N I.'OII PI,ANNI i\ic A i\i D Ii NVI RONN' Ii N]'A I.
COMMISSION APPROVAL
PPsIB-ol'{)
tr
D
tr
Anrcndmcnt to an Approvcd Dcvclopnrcnt Plan
Employcc 4ousing Unit Cfypc: )
Major o5,2{Minor CCI Extcrior Altcration
(VailVillage)
Major or N Minor CCII ExtcriorAltcration
(Lionshcad)
Spccial Dcvclopmcnt District
Major or E Minor Anrcndmcnt to an SDD
o
B
tr
tlLu)
Lr.
[.
ci.
olvNER(s) STGNATURE(S):
LOCAil ON O F p RO pOS A L: yOr de&r{BLoc K_<t_ Ft LrN c Vnt-'4or*or,z Ftesr
ADDRES* 2&3 GopeQiE-Etav,F BUTLDTNCNAME: i frere ,Satutatg
zoNtNG: &/&ntuaz lbZE- 7
NAMEoFowNER(sl' ,*up *atA fule 4aesa6,/J
MAILINC ADDRESS:
NAME OF REPRESENTA
MAILINGADDRESS:
Cert:rW: TpFFrE 4H. FEE . SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
I
STJBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT oF coMM{JNITv DEVELOPMENT, 7s SOUTH FR0NTAGE ROAD,
For Oflice tfsc Only:
.Fccpatd: Loo. oo ck#: I lllt By: 2r,d
Application Datc:PEC Mccting Datc:
PHoNE: 47b- 22?4
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
Rcvircd &96
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
5,'
Tolu
MEMORANDUM Fnew
Planning and Environmenlal Commission
Community Development D€partment
July 13, 1998
A request for a minor exlerior alteration in CC1, to allow for an exterior renovation
of Gorsuch Ltd., located in the Clock Tower Building, 263 Gore Creek Drive/Lots
c,d,e & f, Block 5, Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Gorsuch Ltd, represented by Resort Design Collaborative
IntemationalPlanner: George Ruther
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
Resoil Design Collaborative Intemational, on behalf of Gorsuch Ltd, has requested a minor
exterior alteration in the Commercial Core 1 (CC1) Zone District, to allow for an exterior
renovation and addiiion to the Gorsuch Ltd. store, located within the Clock Tower Building at 263
Gore Creek Drive.
ln anticipation of the upcoming World Alpine Ski Championships, David and Renie Gorsuch,
owners of Gorsuch Ltd, are proposing to renovate the exlerior porlion of the Clock Tower
Building. Proposed improvements include:
. The removal and replacement of the soffit and fascia. The addition of flower boxes at various locations around the building. The removal and replacement of the balcony railings. The addition of copper gutters and downspoutso I complete repainting of the building. The addition of two copper awnings on the Gore Creek Drive side of the building. The construqtion of a permanent arched entry on the Bridge Street side of the building. The addition of a new 46 square foot bay display window and dormer. The replacement of the existing exterior lighting with new recessed can lights. The removal and replacemeni of the awning over the Ore House dining deck. The replacement of the hour markers on the clock
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
TPPROI.,ED Sf TI{E
The following summarizes the relevant zoning statistics forthis request: IfiIil OF VAIL
nfflnnAilD
Bfirn$ffinloolltrF8|oil
nfir*
Zoning:CommercialCore 1 (CC1)
qrlrc*4
oo
tslfr 141OiltOrFHfr
Jf v|]ultffiafirffiJqr4figailnsfil.slffiyttl
ffirr'r'f,llg
!.ryftt*n
Setbacks:
Site Coverage:
Parking:
Loading:
no changes proposed
no changes proposed
Gorsuch Ltd. addition with 46 sq. ft. / 300 sq. ft. = 0.153 spaoes.
Total additional parking fee required = $2,677.65.
No change
III. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town of Vail Municipal
Code. The emphasis of lhis review is on the proposal's compatibility with the Zoning
Regulations, the Town of Vail Streetscape Masler Plan, the Vail Mllage Urban Design Guide
Plan, the Vail Village Design Considerations and the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
A. Gompliance with the Town of Vail Zoning Code
As stated in the Zoning Code, lhe purpose of the CC1 Zone District is as follows:
"The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide siles and to
maintain ihe unique charac{er of ihe Vail Village commercial area, with its
mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly
pedestrian environmenl. The Commercial Core 1 Distrist is intended to
ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to
the permitted types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in
accordence with the Vail Mllage Urban Design Guide Plan and Design
Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to
ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered
anangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public
greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and
architestural qualities that distinguish the Village. (Ord. 21(1980) $ 1)'
Additionally, the Zoning Regulations define an Exterior Alteration as, in parl,
"the alteration of an existing building which adds or removes any enclosed
floor area (and/or) the alteration of an efsting building which modifies the
existing roof."
An exterior alteration is consider a 'mino/' exterior alteration if the addition is less
than 100 square feet in size.
STAFF RESPONSE:
Upon review of the proposed minor exterior alteration, staff believes that the
proposed 46 square foot addition complies with the purpose statement of the CCI
Zone District and that the addilion is a minor elilerior alteration since the proposal
adds 46 square feet of new floor area to the existing building.
'1.
Compliance with the Vail Mllage Urban Design Guide Plan
According to the Vail Village Urban Design Guide plan, the Clock Tower Building
is located within the Gore Creek Drive/Bridge Street sub-area. A review of the
Gore Creek Drive/Bridge Street sub-area revealed thet no specific improvements
are identified for the Clock Tower Building. The only sub-area element relevant to
this proposal is the focal point importance of the clock tower. The applicant is
proposing to replace the hour markenr on the clock. The new hour markers will
be patinaed copper.
STAFF RESPONSE:
Staff believes that the changes to the hour markers will be a positive change
without departing significantly from the historic nalure and appearance of the
clock lower.
Compliance with the urban desion considerations for Vail Village and the
exterior alteEtion criteria.
Urban Design Considerations.
a. Pedeslrianizalion
A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian circulalion through an
interconnected network of safe, pleasant pedestrian ways. Staff believes the
pedestrian ways (Gore Creek Drive & Bridge Street) are already a pleasanl
pedestrian environment with the street benches end the landscaping. The plans
proposed by the applicant further enhance the pedestrian environment. lt is
staffs opinion that the proposed addition and renovations will positively impact the
pedestrian environment adjacent to the Clock Tower Building.
b. Traffic penetration
The minor exterior alteration to the Clock Tower Building will have no effect upon
vehicular penetration into the Village. The proposed addition will generate an
increase in the total parking requirement for the Village Center Building by 0.153
parking spaces. The increase in the parking requirement will be met by the
applicant through a payment into the Town of Vail Parking Fund. Therefore, staff
believes there will be no impacts to vehicular penetration into the Village as a
result of this request.
c. Streetscaoeframework
According to the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations, the quality of the
walking experience should be improved when necessary, and the pedestrian ways
should be maintained. One means of accomplishing this goal is to infill
commercial store fronts. Staff believes that lhe proposed addition and renovation
will generate commercial activity and add to the visual interest of the building
without jeopardizing the walking experience or pedestrian way in the area.
d. Street enclosure
Street enclosure becomes an issue when each side of a street has buildings on it.
ln the case of Gore Creek Drive and Bridge Street, both streels are bordered by
buildings. lt is the staffs opinion that the addition to the Gorsuch Ltd. store will
have a positive effecl on the perception of street enclosure. Staff feels the
proposed arched entry addition will bring the building closer to the main
pedestrian walkway, thus helping to divert the attention of a pedestrian back to the
building and back to the new display window. Staff further believes that the new
awning and the addition of the new balcony rails and flower boxes will increase
and enhance the visual interest of the building.
e. Street edoe
According to the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations, buildings in the Village
should form a strong but irregular edge to the street. ThE resulling 'jogs" in the
buildings should be used as activity areas for pedestrian use (ie. gathering,
resting, orienting, etc.). In staffs opinion the proposed addition meets the goals of
the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations as it relates to street edge.
f. Building height
The building height proposed by the applicant is in keeping with lhe intent of the
Vail Village Urban Design Consideralions. The height of the proposed arched
entry addilion will be significantly less than the overall height of the existing
building. Staff believes that the applicant has done an excellent job of matching
the scale of the addition and the improvements with ihe scale of the existing
building.
g. Views
The Vail Village Urban Design Consideraiions stress the importance of views in
the Village area. As proposed, ihe addition will not encroach upon any of the
established view conidors.
2. Architectural/Landscape Considerations.
a. Roofs
The existing roof surface material on the Clock Tower Building is gravel. The roof
surface material on the clock tower is cedar shakes. When the addition to the
Gorsuch Ltd. store is completed, the new roof over the arched entry addition will
blend and match the existing roof and roof materials. Slaff finds that the roof
forms and roof materials proposed by the applicant are in compliance with the
architec{ural/landscape considerations of the Vail Village Urban Design
Considerations.
b. Facades
The facade of the building is where the majority of the improvements are
proposed. The improvements to the facade are listed on page 1 of this
memorendum. According to the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations, bay,
D.
bow and box windows are common window details, which add further variety and
massing to facades. Such window types are encouraged. lt is the opinion of the
staff that the new building facade will result in an improved and enhanced
appearance of Vail Village.
c. Balconies
The applicant has proposed lo remove and replace the balcony rails around the
building. The new rails and accompanying flower boxes help to further the goals
of the Vail Village Master Plan.
d. Decks and Patios
The existing dining deck at the Ore House will not be impacted by this proposal as
there will be no net loss of dining area. The existing green canvas canopy over
the dining deck is to be replaced with a new canvas canopy. The new canopy will
be blue & white striped. The new €nopy is intended lo improve the visual
inierest of the building at street level.
e. Accent elements
Colorful accent elements, consistent with existing character are encouraged in lhe
Village. The applicant is proposing changes to the building that will incorporate
new accenl elements. Overall, staff believes the addition and renovations will be
a positive element on the building.
f. Landscape elements
Upon review of the site, staff finds the landscape elements around the building
are more than adequete.
o. Service
No additional loading and delivery services arc required as a result of this request.
Compliance with the Town of Vail Strcetscaoe Master Plan.
The Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan ettempts to improve the functioning
character of the area by adding sidewalks where none presently exist, screening
parking areas, and to enhance the visual appearance ofthe Town. Each ofthe
slreetscape elements prescribed for lhe area around the Clock Tower Building
have been implemented to the extent possible.
STAFF RESPONSE:
Upon review of the site by staff, the improvements suggested in the Town of Vail
Master Streetscape Plan have already been completed. Therefore, no new
streetscape plan improvements are proposed to be made with this application.
E. Gompliance with the Vail Gomprehensive Plan
Several elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan indirectly address lhe proposed
minor exterior alteration to the Clock Tower Building. The relevant elements and
sestions are lisled below:
1. Land Use Plan -
4.3: "The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail
and should be preserved. Scale, alpine character, small town
feeling, mountains, natural setting, intimate size, cosmopolitan
feeling and environmental quality shall be maintained or
enhanced."
2. Vail Village Master Plan -
2.4 Objective: "Encourage the development of a variety of
commercial activities that are compatible with existing land uses."
2.4.1 Policy: "Commercial infill development consistent with
established horizontal zoning regulations shall be encouraged to
provide activity generators, accessible green spaces, public
plazas, and slreetscape improvements to the pedestrian network
throughout the Village."
STAFF RESPONSE;
Staff believes lhe applicant's proposal seeks to achieve each of the objectives
and policies listed above.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommendations approval of the proposed
minor exterior alteration to the Clock Tower Building to allow for an addition and
renovations to Gorsuch Ltd. The recommendation for lhe approval of the minor exterior
alteration is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in section lll of this
memorandum. Staff finds the applicant's request complies with the criteria outlined for a
request of this neture in the Zoning Code, the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, the
Vail Village Design Considerations, and the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, staff
believes the minor exlerior alteration proposed by the applicant is supported by the
Town's goals and objectives.
Should the PEC choose to approve the applicant's requesi for a minor exterior alteration,
the staff would recommend the following findings be made:
'1. That the minor enerior alteration is in compliance and is compatible with the
Town of Vail Zoning Code, the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, the Vail
Village Urban Design Guide Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations
and the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
Should the PEC choose to approve the applicant's request for a minor exterior alteration
to allow for an addition and renovations to Gorsuch Ltd., the staff would recommend that
the approval carry with it the following conditions:
1. That the applicant submit detailed civil engineering drawings indicating how ihe
gutters and downspouts will be tied into the Town of Vail stormwater system. The
drawings shall be submitted for review and approval of the Town Engineer prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
2. That the applicant submit an application and receive a revocable right-of-way
permit to allow for work to be completed in the Town of Vail right-of-way prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
3. That the applicant pay $2,677.65 into the Town of Vail parking fund prior to the
issuance of a Tempomry CertificEte of Occupancy.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
CLOCKTOWER BUILDING/GORSUCH LIMITED
EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
The Clock Tower Building/Gorsuch Limited Store have been a landmark in Vail
practically from the inception. The two buildings that comprise what is now known as
the Clock Tower Building were constructed in 1965 and 1966. Various renovations to
the exterior and interior have been completed to date to improve the building's
appearance. The Gorsuchs would now like to bring the whole building together
aesthetically and update the details to change the 1960's character ofthe building.
The proposed improvements are focused on the west elevation as this is perceived to be
the weakest elevation by the Gorsuchs. The scope of the proposed revisions is cosmetic
in nature with the exception of an entry feature and bay windoddormer on the Bridge
Street side. These revisions include:r The removal and replacement of the existing fascia and soffit on the entire
building.r The removal and replacement of the all existing balcony railings and the
addition of flower boxes at most balconies.o A change in the stucco color from white to an off white.o A change in the trim color from black to medium brown.r Removing the roof drainage crickets on the south side and replacing them
with copper collector head and downspouts.r Replacement of various door and window trim elements to be more in line
with the details on the east end of the building on the Gore Creek Drive side.r Addition of two copper awnings on the Gore Creek Drive side entries.r Extension of the roof overhangs 12"on the two west gables of the Gore Creek
Drive side.r Remove the existing arched canvas canopy at the entrance to the Ore House
restaurant, replace with an entry feature as shown on the attached drawings.r Remove the south balcony on the Bridge Street elevation and replace it with a
bay window and dormer roof as shown on the attached drawings.r Change the material and color of the over the two outdoor dining areas to a
traditional Gorsuch awning material used on other Gorsuch Ltd. Stores.r Modernize and improve the exterior lighting of the building: remove existing
downlights and replace with recessed can lights in soffits and other accent
lighting fixtures.
r Replace the hour marks of the clock on the tower.
We believe these renovations improve the somewhat dated appearance of the Clocktower
Building while improving the "building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish
the village." The Clocklower Building as it exists complies with the all the issues of the
Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. The proposed renovations only serve to enhance
the existing building scale and improve the overall appearance.
\WAIL_SVR_01\clients\PR Gorsuch Rem Vail\docs\PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION.d0C
/
a
I
-'r- *
frK:.
_.",9
w *-.-**-*-
# *-.*^-*-
IUPRO\oIEHT LOCATIot,I CERNNCATE AND
TOFOGRAPHIC SUR\EY
LOTS d & s, BLoCK 5. VAIL VILLAGE, FIRSI FlLrflc
LorS c & t, SUFER ,/ McBRloE SU80l\1Sl0N
TOr$'r 0F vArL. EAG|E Co('NTY. C0L@A00
lol d
4N
ExrsrlNc sourH 2ND LEVEL PLAN flttonrnlciLE' v.' .1'-0' ll
EXISTING SOUTII STREET LEVEL PLAN
fi.-t" coRE cREEK DRrvE
trl
9::l -
--<h A
uge{H{
J*.*56U
OFJAaR'
jiiii:iirili!r!i ''r#r"J"Joll"l,.*,
3UOIS 3CV11|A HSnSUO9
aqi
3F3,2
=
e
-
l!an9X
;t'oith
c-t
rItt
xz
GORSUCH VILIAGE STORE -i
:i;r ;ii: ;:i iiiiF
S.t..brr3 &
GORSTJCH LTD,
oFFICE SPACI OORSUCH LTD.
BEIA|L APACE
I
NEW FI..IOWER EOX
PROPOSED WEST 3RD LEVEL PLAN
PROPOSED WEST STREETLlt.l: Vt' - l'-c
ITVEL PLAN
I
\ NORTH
BRIDGE STREET
PROPOSED WEST 2ND LEVEL PLAN
sCA|.e Va'- !-f
UJ
:.,
o
l!
J
-J
(J
o
J
B1
E
lr,lFxlrl
. J"o.-,,on-I3QOh{3U UOIU:|IX3
:ruors 30v1-Iln Hlnsuoc
6
ul
(.)
lq
/z
z
J
|rJ
!J
Etrlc
lh
F
o
2,:-
E;lqt
=l9F
F
,z
z
J|rl
IIJJ
z
F
at
E4 ttAd
B
*azi
]
azfl\
jl
Et>
fii
AEEvl
iH
=-li
-le
_-_*_e i
*;ii: !:: ;ilr ii;!:SUOrS 39\f-r'ilA HCnSUOO
E
e
z
k
JgJ
F
36
Qr,
!1 >
4d
Ee.
gE
g
qE
E2
2
3
sEIF
EF
6i
ax
'gg
5t
et
r:l
fiF{F']i:8
F;
ai sEig :;:i :9t! E9
T:
3E
I
t:
{l
i.i:i uiiu i:i: 4;;;
ocvuo-toc "ltvn .-rSqohl:Iu uoluSJxa
SUOJS 3OVTiln H)OSUO9
7I
r: ii Yt: I' rr
i! !l i
I 18 r,| ;;gI i!8| :1 .!| !:zI l: a| :J I| :t 5I i! oli ii Elb :r 3i: o
6I
r: li:
$9EEa
,5,ol 5il -dr*u
iIFgEEg
coooo
t;::l
l&:_Jt
ll-,r-lLJI
dh
sli
L
il
;.o
A-r_equest for minor exlerior alterations at the Vail Village Clock Tower Building (CCl) located at263 Gore Creek Drive/ Lots C, D, E & F, Block 5, Vail Viilage First
Applicant: S. David Gorsuch, represented by Resort Design CollaborativePlanner: George Ruther
A r9_g_uesl for an additional 250 square feet of GRFA for a primary/secondary residence localed
at 493 Beaver Dam Road/ Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Village 6th.
Applicant:
Planner:
Ron Byrne represented by William Reslock
George Ruther
A request for a rezoning from previously unzoned property owned by the United States ForEst
Service and lransfened to the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment
Agreement to Primary / Secondary Residential District for property located at Ptarmigan Road
/Govemmenl Lots 2 (1 .66 acres) and 3 (4.252 acres) crealed by a survey done in 1995 under
the authority of the Bureau of Land Management Cadastral Survey.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
The applications and informalion about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planne/s office located at lhe Town of Vail Community
Development Deparlment, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interprelation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 26, 1998 in the Vail Trail.
l l" l,ll',, ,,, 11, ,1' l ll, ,,l,l, ,l
James M, Todd
5728 S. Gallup Street
Littleton, CO 80120
Richard K. Parker
3329E. Bayaud 1514
Denver, CO 80209
ll"l''"ll'll,,,l,l,l,r,l,,ll'l
Slifer Buildin& LLC
230 Bridge Street
Vail. CO 81657
l
286 Bridge Street, Inc.
701S.E.6th Ave.
Del Ray Beach, FL 33483
Plaza Lodge Condominium Association
291 Bridge Street
Vail. CO 81657
Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc.
231 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
c/o East West Partners; Attn: Chris Wright
Drawer 2770
Avory CO 81620
o
Gorsuch Ltd.
Clock Tower Building Alteration to Exterior
List of Adjacent Property Owners
Subject Property Address:
Clock Tower Building,263 Gore Creek Drive
Gosuch Ltd - John P McBride
263 E. Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
Adjacent Properfy Owners:
A&D Building,286 Bridge Street
286 Bridge Sheet, Inc.
701 S.E. 6'Ave.
Del Ray Beach, FL 33483
Casino Building,281 Bridge Street
Plaza Lodge Condominium Association
291 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Gasthof Gramshammer,23l Gore Creek Drive
Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc.
231 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building,227 Bridge Street
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
o%East West Partners; Attn: Chris Wright
Drawer 2770
Avon, CO 81620
Slifer Building,230 Bridge Street
Slifer Building,LLC
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Townhouses, 303 Gore Creek Drive
Unit 2A:
Richard K. Parker
3329E.Bayaud 1514
Denver, CO 80209
Unit 2B:
James M. Todd
5728 S. Gallup Street
Littleton, CO 80120
WAIL,SVR_O1\clients\PRl\Gorsuch Rem_VaiMocs\Adj Prop Owners List.doc
v ,rJtcE coRl
. att omtr r{ cLlI&Illlo allr!|tr!|D{o Eq^FlD
- u!leDr rdtrlD^'ttllt d lltltlttll|4<rat rror n.I,|l tarvla arDDIlVlrr raolxirD^tnr
- r E c$Ea totlal od8 loiltttsttvl
. |Dal|nat otio|'r,||{nua ma ADolLotrl|Df{fa focErl
. udl.ro|.| rrvlr! ^rl o{rDaqjllt ll{ lxilllttlt
. rcra 8^flr.o lra^a ^rt flloall
- omrr af't n llaBrru*;a 1r|| at llgl rct('.tr r|r| rDcrrflra-l.llatc- rn r|r xrl|rarr
- xfrlt rar Yla.orro lrclJraa l||ot,lD aacoa-ua.tEo trato t|raot.. aEtt,|ta
Gorsuch Ltd.
Subject Property
!!l! !t!!t!
,r#-tn"-
d.
. loooa t^a.L€') r,F# t.tcuro
[] <*-.rrnt^v"rc
n ct.l(ra s|{tt t^vus
lpjil rrrcx t^v{s
Ii;l cullfrr t^vtf€
f] urucrlo las
Figure 14
9!!!4-!gt!ra!!-
-
nrsrrirr.r.|lorrtlarr
dcdtt'
1
\?*'
INVENTORY/ANALYSIS
VILLAGE CORE
rat vlt-.cE stf,€€tsc^t€
Town ofVall Strtetocape Marlcr Plan Page 69
co*orf;ity Development rhn noutg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimeq Public Works
Mike McGee, Fire
RetumTo:George Ruther
Date Routed:6lt7l98
RetumBy:ASAP
Project Nane:Gorsuch Exterior Modifi cations
Project Address:263 Gore Creek Drive
Project Legal:d,e,c, & { Block 5, Vail Village First
Project Description:Exterior Modifications
{pproved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditrons
1) On south side of your building, you are showing two new copper down spouts. All down spouts need to be
rmder grounded and not spilled onto the surface. Please show us and tell us how you plan to do this work. The
old avming nwer had grtters and down spouts and that makes for lots of ice in the winter on Bridge Street. Please
add gutters and down spouts for the new awning and show how you will underground the down spouts.
2) Please place propertry right of way line on slreet A-5 for the new arched entry. The survey and your drawing
do not match iftlre new arched entry is in the TOV R-O-W you will need to get a revooable right of way permit.
l€t Lsrry Pardee from Public Works know who your contractor is and when they would like to staxt this
project. We will need a staging plan. 479-2198
LarryPardee 6123/98
oo
Design Review Action Form
rowN oF YAIL
ProjectName: Gorsuch Ltd. Remodel
Project Description: Connect east and west retail sales areas
Owner, Address and Phone: Gorsuch, Ltd. - Colorrdo S Corp.
263 Eest Gore Creek Drfue, Vall, Co 81657
(9701476-2294
Architect/Contact. Address and Phone:Rav Storv. Architect
SziO xat'sirs Ranch Road, Vail
(970) 476-563e
263 East Gore Creek Drlve
Lot C-E, Block 5, Vall Villege lst
BuildingName: Gorsuch
Project Street Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comrnents:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
nlt
Board / Staff Action
Action: Staff ApProval
l. Parking pay in lleu fee of $6,112.02 ls required to be paid before building permit is
issued.
Town Planner: Christie Berton
Date: 416t98 DRB Fee Pre-Paid: $20.00
TOWI,IOFVAIL
Department of Community Developnen
75 South Fronnge Road
VarL Cobrado 81657
97G479-2138
FAX97M79-2452
April 6, 1998
Gorsuch Ltd.
Colorado S Corp.
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail. CO 81657
Re: Parting Pay in Lieu Fees
Dear Gorsuch Ltd.:
I have reviewed your application for connecting the east and west retail sales arca. Any increase
in squarc footage for properties in the Commercial Core 1 area requires a contribution to the
Town Parking Fund. This parking pay in lieu fee is established to meet fuhue dcmands for
parking, and is currently $17,462.92 perparking space, The proposed increase of 105 square feet
istheequivalentto0.35ofaparkingspace, Thcrefore,yourcontributionis$6112.02, The feeis
required before a building permit can be issued.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me at (970) 479-2454,
Very truly yours,
AA
Mtne{* br/trJ
Christie Barton
Town Planner
tp *ouo'uo
286 Bridge Street, Inc.
701S.E.6th Ave.
Del Ray Beach, FL 33483
Plaza Lodge Condominium Association
291 Bridge Street
Vail. CO 81657
Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc.
231 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
c/o East West Partners; Attn: Chris Wright
Drawer 2770
Avory CO 81620
o
Gorsuch Ltd.
Clock Tower Building Alteration to Exterior
List of Adjacent Property Owners
Subject Property Address:
Clock Tower Building,263 Gore Creek Drive
Gosuch Ltd - John P McBride
263 E. Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
Adjacent Properfy Owners:
A&D Building,286 Bridge Street
286 Bridge Sheet, Inc.
701 S.E. 6'Ave.
Del Ray Beach, FL 33483
Casino Building,281 Bridge Street
Plaza Lodge Condominium Association
291 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Gasthof Gramshammer,23l Gore Creek Drive
Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc.
231 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building,227 Bridge Street
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
o%East West Partners; Attn: Chris Wright
Drawer 2770
Avon, CO 81620
Slifer Building,230 Bridge Street
Slifer Building,LLC
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Townhouses, 303 Gore Creek Drive
Unit 2A:
Richard K. Parker
3329E.Bayaud 1514
Denver, CO 80209
Unit 2B:
James M. Todd
5728 S. Gallup Street
Littleton, CO 80120
WAIL,SVR_O1\clients\PRl\Gorsuch Rem_VaiMocs\Adj Prop Owners List.doc
v ,rJtcE coRl
. att omtr r{ cLlI&Illlo allr!|tr!|D{o Eq^FlD
- u!leDr rdtrlD^'ttllt d lltltlttll|4<rat rror n.I,|l tarvla arDDIlVlrr raolxirD^tnr
- r E c$Ea totlal od8 loiltttsttvl
. |Dal|nat otio|'r,||{nua ma ADolLotrl|Df{fa focErl
. udl.ro|.| rrvlr! ^rl o{rDaqjllt ll{ lxilllttlt
. rcra 8^flr.o lra^a ^rt flloall
- omrr af't n llaBrru*;a 1r|| at llgl rct('.tr r|r| rDcrrflra-l.llatc- rn r|r xrl|rarr
- xfrlt rar Yla.orro lrclJraa l||ot,lD aacoa-ua.tEo trato t|raot.. aEtt,|ta
Gorsuch Ltd.
Subject Property
!!l! !t!!t!
,r#-tn"-
d.
. loooa t^a.L€') r,F# t.tcuro
[] <*-.rrnt^v"rc
n ct.l(ra s|{tt t^vus
lpjil rrrcx t^v{s
Ii;l cullfrr t^vtf€
f] urucrlo las
Figure 14
9!!!4-!gt!ra!!-
-
nrsrrirr.r.|lorrtlarr
dcdtt'
1
\?*'
INVENTORY/ANALYSIS
VILLAGE CORE
rat vlt-.cE stf,€€tsc^t€
Town ofVall Strtetocape Marlcr Plan Page 69
co*orf;ity Development rhn noutg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimeq Public Works
Mike McGee, Fire
RetumTo:George Ruther
Date Routed:6lt7l98
RetumBy:ASAP
Project Nane:Gorsuch Exterior Modifi cations
Project Address:263 Gore Creek Drive
Project Legal:d,e,c, & { Block 5, Vail Village First
Project Description:Exterior Modifications
{pproved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditrons
1) On south side of your building, you are showing two new copper down spouts. All down spouts need to be
rmder grounded and not spilled onto the surface. Please show us and tell us how you plan to do this work. The
old avming nwer had grtters and down spouts and that makes for lots of ice in the winter on Bridge Street. Please
add gutters and down spouts for the new awning and show how you will underground the down spouts.
2) Please place propertry right of way line on slreet A-5 for the new arched entry. The survey and your drawing
do not match iftlre new arched entry is in the TOV R-O-W you will need to get a revooable right of way permit.
l€t Lsrry Pardee from Public Works know who your contractor is and when they would like to staxt this
project. We will need a staging plan. 479-2198
LarryPardee 6123/98
oo
Design Review Action Form
rowN oF YAIL
ProjectName: Gorsuch Ltd. Remodel
Project Description: Connect east and west retail sales areas
Owner, Address and Phone: Gorsuch, Ltd. - Colorrdo S Corp.
263 Eest Gore Creek Drfue, Vall, Co 81657
(9701476-2294
Architect/Contact. Address and Phone:Rav Storv. Architect
SziO xat'sirs Ranch Road, Vail
(970) 476-563e
263 East Gore Creek Drlve
Lot C-E, Block 5, Vall Villege lst
BuildingName: Gorsuch
Project Street Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comrnents:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
nlt
Board / Staff Action
Action: Staff ApProval
l. Parking pay in lleu fee of $6,112.02 ls required to be paid before building permit is
issued.
Town Planner: Christie Berton
Date: 416t98 DRB Fee Pre-Paid: $20.00
TOWI,IOFVAIL
Department of Community Developnen
75 South Fronnge Road
VarL Cobrado 81657
97G479-2138
FAX97M79-2452
April 6, 1998
Gorsuch Ltd.
Colorado S Corp.
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail. CO 81657
Re: Parting Pay in Lieu Fees
Dear Gorsuch Ltd.:
I have reviewed your application for connecting the east and west retail sales arca. Any increase
in squarc footage for properties in the Commercial Core 1 area requires a contribution to the
Town Parking Fund. This parking pay in lieu fee is established to meet fuhue dcmands for
parking, and is currently $17,462.92 perparking space, The proposed increase of 105 square feet
istheequivalentto0.35ofaparkingspace, Thcrefore,yourcontributionis$6112.02, The feeis
required before a building permit can be issued.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me at (970) 479-2454,
Very truly yours,
AA
Mtne{* br/trJ
Christie Barton
Town Planner
tp *ouo'uo
286 Bridge Street, Inc.
701S.E.6th Ave.
Del Ray Beach, FL 33483
Plaza Lodge Condominium Association
291 Bridge Street
Vail. CO 81657
Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc.
231 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
c/o East West Partners; Attn: Chris Wright
Drawer 2770
Avory CO 81620
o
Gorsuch Ltd.
Clock Tower Building Alteration to Exterior
List of Adjacent Property Owners
Subject Property Address:
Clock Tower Building,263 Gore Creek Drive
Gosuch Ltd - John P McBride
263 E. Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
Adjacent Properfy Owners:
A&D Building,286 Bridge Street
286 Bridge Sheet, Inc.
701 S.E. 6'Ave.
Del Ray Beach, FL 33483
Casino Building,281 Bridge Street
Plaza Lodge Condominium Association
291 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Gasthof Gramshammer,23l Gore Creek Drive
Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc.
231 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Covered Bridge Building,227 Bridge Street
Covered Bridge Building, Ltd.
o%East West Partners; Attn: Chris Wright
Drawer 2770
Avon, CO 81620
Slifer Building,230 Bridge Street
Slifer Building,LLC
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Townhouses, 303 Gore Creek Drive
Unit 2A:
Richard K. Parker
3329E.Bayaud 1514
Denver, CO 80209
Unit 2B:
James M. Todd
5728 S. Gallup Street
Littleton, CO 80120
WAIL,SVR_O1\clients\PRl\Gorsuch Rem_VaiMocs\Adj Prop Owners List.doc
v ,rJtcE coRl
. att omtr r{ cLlI&Illlo allr!|tr!|D{o Eq^FlD
- u!leDr rdtrlD^'ttllt d lltltlttll|4<rat rror n.I,|l tarvla arDDIlVlrr raolxirD^tnr
- r E c$Ea totlal od8 loiltttsttvl
. |Dal|nat otio|'r,||{nua ma ADolLotrl|Df{fa focErl
. udl.ro|.| rrvlr! ^rl o{rDaqjllt ll{ lxilllttlt
. rcra 8^flr.o lra^a ^rt flloall
- omrr af't n llaBrru*;a 1r|| at llgl rct('.tr r|r| rDcrrflra-l.llatc- rn r|r xrl|rarr
- xfrlt rar Yla.orro lrclJraa l||ot,lD aacoa-ua.tEo trato t|raot.. aEtt,|ta
Gorsuch Ltd.
Subject Property
!!l! !t!!t!
,r#-tn"-
d.
. loooa t^a.L€') r,F# t.tcuro
[] <*-.rrnt^v"rc
n ct.l(ra s|{tt t^vus
lpjil rrrcx t^v{s
Ii;l cullfrr t^vtf€
f] urucrlo las
Figure 14
9!!!4-!gt!ra!!-
-
nrsrrirr.r.|lorrtlarr
dcdtt'
1
\?*'
INVENTORY/ANALYSIS
VILLAGE CORE
rat vlt-.cE stf,€€tsc^t€
Town ofVall Strtetocape Marlcr Plan Page 69
co*orf;ity Development rhn noutg Form
Routed To:Greg Hall, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimeq Public Works
Mike McGee, Fire
RetumTo:George Ruther
Date Routed:6lt7l98
RetumBy:ASAP
Project Nane:Gorsuch Exterior Modifi cations
Project Address:263 Gore Creek Drive
Project Legal:d,e,c, & { Block 5, Vail Village First
Project Description:Exterior Modifications
{pproved _x_Denied (cite detailed reasons)Approved with conditrons
1) On south side of your building, you are showing two new copper down spouts. All down spouts need to be
rmder grounded and not spilled onto the surface. Please show us and tell us how you plan to do this work. The
old avming nwer had grtters and down spouts and that makes for lots of ice in the winter on Bridge Street. Please
add gutters and down spouts for the new awning and show how you will underground the down spouts.
2) Please place propertry right of way line on slreet A-5 for the new arched entry. The survey and your drawing
do not match iftlre new arched entry is in the TOV R-O-W you will need to get a revooable right of way permit.
l€t Lsrry Pardee from Public Works know who your contractor is and when they would like to staxt this
project. We will need a staging plan. 479-2198
LarryPardee 6123/98
oo
Design Review Action Form
rowN oF YAIL
ProjectName: Gorsuch Ltd. Remodel
Project Description: Connect east and west retail sales areas
Owner, Address and Phone: Gorsuch, Ltd. - Colorrdo S Corp.
263 Eest Gore Creek Drfue, Vall, Co 81657
(9701476-2294
Architect/Contact. Address and Phone:Rav Storv. Architect
SziO xat'sirs Ranch Road, Vail
(970) 476-563e
263 East Gore Creek Drlve
Lot C-E, Block 5, Vall Villege lst
BuildingName: Gorsuch
Project Street Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comrnents:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:
nlt
Board / Staff Action
Action: Staff ApProval
l. Parking pay in lleu fee of $6,112.02 ls required to be paid before building permit is
issued.
Town Planner: Christie Berton
Date: 416t98 DRB Fee Pre-Paid: $20.00
TOWI,IOFVAIL
Department of Community Developnen
75 South Fronnge Road
VarL Cobrado 81657
97G479-2138
FAX97M79-2452
April 6, 1998
Gorsuch Ltd.
Colorado S Corp.
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail. CO 81657
Re: Parting Pay in Lieu Fees
Dear Gorsuch Ltd.:
I have reviewed your application for connecting the east and west retail sales arca. Any increase
in squarc footage for properties in the Commercial Core 1 area requires a contribution to the
Town Parking Fund. This parking pay in lieu fee is established to meet fuhue dcmands for
parking, and is currently $17,462.92 perparking space, The proposed increase of 105 square feet
istheequivalentto0.35ofaparkingspace, Thcrefore,yourcontributionis$6112.02, The feeis
required before a building permit can be issued.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me at (970) 479-2454,
Very truly yours,
AA
Mtne{* br/trJ
Christie Barton
Town Planner
tp *ouo'uo
RECEIPT - The Tovn of Yail
,n" *-l'[ ,t#
ADDRESS
tnTt PAID-Odr _-CrrccY l0(7fi
N9 48559
t,
Z5
MEMO
To: Planning Staff
From: George Ruther, Town Planner
Date: March 12, 1998
Re: Parking Pay In Lieu Fees for 1998
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1994, established the Parking Pay in Lieu Fee of $15,000 per parking
space. The fee is automatically updated each year based on the percent increase in the consumer
price index for the Denver-goulder area. Below is a historical analysis of the pay in lieu fees for
the Town of Vail:
Date
12131192 - 07119194 N/A
07119194 - 12l3rle4 N/A
01101/95 - l2l3ll9s 4.4%
01101196 - 12131196 43%
0ll0rl97 - 12131197 3.5%
01/01/98 - L2131198 3,30/o
Source: Colorado Municipal League
C\overyone\george\ nlieu,wpd
CPI (increase) Fee Per Space
$8,594.40
$15,000.00
$15,660.00
$ I 6,333,3 8
$16,905.05
$17,462.92
ryL 2,?6 x rl?,4{?'?z *{b{l'o*
'vn
- -q.2,rQAa _
:9'71vt42tan1 ;9ll
,$*HJ
o
e
aO
,.hr v
,d (ln ,ta"
J ,,1!"n
&vJ'd'<i+'V,2"- Lt*t-+enJfr'
ileu d atxlc.2t&*Jca
F-xzxv^1€ -To -@P,oF f1a
W +. caxv, d*p at-lae*ag
t-,lgxl GZFA co'rllLz'r'= be$ -.1dE LJ G. Ufr-y"o n N @z f xr-r
A?t6? 6x2.\\/fr1/,4.J.cr\ H2LE til eKHl;1^!\lrVNEt LUfrfeLf*.4ge' :i '4-$xUxe/on -
"-b-16
Irt
N
g
$
uj
$
1
-f
o'
_bta
ul
0r
og
g
z
Ft
E
N
I
Fzz
$j
bI0
0
00
I
I
INFN s'4n.Jz.atl@r^14-- . .j,
_ h.6rL-4PA{ Fa'fI4#t4bu+4 ry-
-deu 4) aqc,ilantslcl i.t4rl-e-#z'qr.'+v'*TQ, Te -{aP oF F1a
llF.l 4" caxv, *.1*u 2 sL4vao]€
"-?'16
H
.fi
L'J
\T
I
4f
$ta
'0sr
o
E
Itl
E
IAI
fr
F7z
Bj
ilo
t
trign Review lcttn Form
TOWN OFVAIL
Project Name: Gorsuch
Project Descriptiou Window color change from white to green
Owncr, Address and Phone: Gorsuch LTD.,263 E. Gore Creek Drive, Vail
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Roy Johnston
Project Street Address: 263 Gore Creek Drive
Legal Description: Lot E' Blk. 5' Vail Village lst
Parcel Number:
Comments:
BuildingNamc:
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote:
Conditions:Staff approved
Town Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Date: 9-25-97
Board / Staff Action
Action:
F:\EVERYONE\DRB\APPRovAL\97\C,OR sUCH.92 5
DRB Fee Pre-Paid:$20.00
Qucstiorrs? at Planning Staff at 479-21 28
APPT,ICATION I.'OR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAI,
CENEI{AI- INFORMATION
1'his application is for any projcot rcquiring l)csign Rcvicrv approval. Any pro.icct rcquidng dcsign rcvicw must
rcccivc Dcsign Rcvicw approval pnor to subntitting for a builtling pcrtnit. Iror spccific infomtatiotl, scc the subrnittal
rcquircnrcnts for thc pnrticLrlru'approval that is rcqucstcil. Thc application catrnot bc acccptcd until all thc rcquircd
infornration is strbnrittc{. 't'hc piojcct nray also nccd to bc rcvicrvcd by thc T'orvtr Couticil anrl,/or thc Plarrning and
E,nvironnrcntal Cotltnissiol.t. flesign ltcvicw Board approval cxpircs onc year aftCr final approval unlcss a
builrling permil is issrrcd and construction is started'
(1< l{lva=+-DESCRIPTION OF 1'FtII REQUI]ST:$rut #s6 t-^*' 4r
t].
D.
1,.
Pt{YStCiAt. ADDRESS: 6[-Lc
(Contact Eaglc Co. Asscssors Ollicc at 970-32|i-8640 for parccl fl)PARCEL tI:
ZONING:
TOlf/N CFVAIL
t,l{oNE:
OWN ER(S) SIGNATUI{I'(S):
NAME OF OWNER(S):
li.
(i
MAII-ING ADDRF]SS:
NAME OF APPI,ICAN'I':\)o
H.
MAILINC ADDRESS:
PIIONE,:
C.lonstmction of a nov building.
Includcs any adtlition rvhcrc sqttnrc lboiagc is addcd to any rcsidcntial or
conrnrcrcial buildin,I.
lltinor Altcration -$20 Includos nrinor chatrgcs to buildings and sitc inrprovcnlcuts. such as'
rcrooling. painting, rvindow additions, lardscaping' fcnccs and rctaining
rvalls, ctc.
DI{B fces arc to bc paid at thc tirnc of submittal. Latcr, rvhcn applying for a building perrit, plcase identily
thc acctratc valuatiol of thc projcct. Thc Town of Vail will adjust thc fcc according to thc projcct valuatiotr.
PI.,EASE SUBMIT THtS APPLICATION, ALL STJBMITTAL REQUIRBMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVIILOPMENT' T5 SOUTI{ FRONTAGE ROAD'
vAIL. COLORADO ti1657.
TYPI] OF REVIIJW AND FEt-T,:
E Ncw Construction - $200
D Addition - $50
MEMBERS PRESENT
Bob Armour
Henry Pratt
Jeff Bowen
Greg Moffett
Kevin Deighan
Greg Amsden
MEMBERS ABSENT
Dalton Williams
TOWN COUNCIL
Peggy Oslerfoss
Merv Lapin
SybilNavas
Jan Strauch
B,"b q /"7E
STAFF PRESENT:
Susan Connelly
Mike Mollica
Jim Curnutte
Lauren Waterton
George Ruther
Judy Rodriguez
\/" L /; /h4e- /sl-
FtL r c0pv6o""n gl/1 'PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June'12, 1995
MINUTES
Publlc Hearinq 2:00 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Bob Armour at 2:1Opm
1.. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an automatic teller machine to be located
at 263 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot E, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: David Gorsuch and Beth Golde, representing Vail Bank
Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave the following overview:
Weststar Bank, formerly doing business as Vail Bank, has requested a Conditional Use Permit
approval to allow for the installation and operation of an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) to be
located at the Gorsuch Building, 263 East Gore Creek Drive, Lot E, Block 5, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Staff has determined that an Automatic Teller Machine falls under the category of "Banks and
Financial Institutions" (as described in the Town of Vail Municipal Code). This type of use is
subject to Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) Conditional Use Permit review and
approval prior to being located on the "first floor or street level'within the Commercial Core | (CCl)
Zone District. Therelore, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to install and
operate an automatic teller machine in the CCI zone district. Banks and Financial Institutions
are permined uses on all of the levels ol buildings within the CGI Zone District.
The ATM would be located on the south side of the Gorsuch Building, immediately adjacent to East
Gore Creek Drive, The teller machine would be placed on an existing blank wall between two retail
display windows. The machine will be mounted llush with lhe existing exterior wall and, therefore,
would not add any new commercial square footage to the building. A 12-inch countertop is
proposed with the ATM on top of a trash receptacte partially installed into the exterior of the
Gorsuch Building. The stainless steel housing of the machine would be faced with wood and
stained to match the existing trim colors on the Gorsuch Building.
To provide adequate customer access to the ATM machine, the applicant is proposing to cover a
portion of the existing exterior staiMell with a reinlorced concrete slab, to be covered with pavers.
The brick pavers proposed by the applicant would be malched to the existing pavers along East
Gore Creek Drive. The brick paver construction proposed would be installed to insure positive
drainage away from the building. The area would drain into the existing drain pan along East Gore
Creek Drive, thus eliminating any potential icing problems during the winter monlhs.
The applicant has indicated that additional stone veneer would be added to the building in the area
of the'riew ATM. The additional stone added to the building would match the stone cunently on the
building. Additionally, lo provide shelter from the weather ior the customers u$ng. !!tq AJlr' tlte
,
applica-nt is proposinj to bxtend an existing, second floor deck located above the ATM. The deck
would be exienbeO approximatety six feet io the east to accomplish this goa!. Besides providing-
protection from the de'atner, the beck extension would also serve as a location to install a 3 sq. ft.
'hanqino sion directly above the machine. The sign would be suspended from the deck by short
tengitrjot 6nain. me sign and the associated lighting would be subject to review by the Design
Review Board.
Statf recommendation for this request is approval. Staff finds that the applicant's request complies
w1h all of the above criteria and findings n'ebessary for granting a Conditional Use Permit approval
in the CCI Zone District, as well as thdrelevant eldments of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Should
the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to grant an approval of the,applicant's request
for the ATMI the statf would recommend that tfre approval carry with it the following conditions:
1. That the applicant monitor the ATM area daily to insure the area remains
free of trash and debris.2. That the applicant complete and submit a Design Review Board sign
application for the proposed WestTeller sign.
3. fhat att areas of the siainless steel housing be either painted or covered in
wood to reduce the possibility ol reflection and glare of the machine.
Henry Pratt stated that he doesn't like the architectural enclosure and feels the trash is still an
issue.
Greg Moffet asked if a receipt could be optional.
Beth Golde said there is 4yes/no receipt option and would investigate this turther.
Greg Moflet is in favor of i yes/no receipt option and alsQ stated that the balcony area is dingy.
Kevin Deighan mirrored Greg's comments.
Jetf Bowen questioned the proposed location.
Beth Golde said the location was requested by the community.
Jetf Bowen stated that the location had no proximity to the bank.
Jetf Bowen and Beth Golde agreed that debris will be cleaned jointly by building owners and the
bank employees.
Bob Armour assured all that the ATM would be under close scrutiny by the Design Review Board.
Jeff Bowgn made a motion to approve the request subject lo the following conditions:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of
the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes ol
the district in which the site is located.2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.3. Th'at the proposed use would comply wilh each of the applicable provisions
of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
4. That staff would monitor the use and it a trash problem occurs, the item
woutd be.called-up".
George Ruther made it clear that Statf would monitor the area to make sure trash was not a
problem.
Jeff Bowen suggested that be a condition for granting the request and made a motion to grant the
request.
Greg Motfet seconded the motion.
All voted unanimously in favor, with a vote ol 6-0.
2. A request for a joint worksession with the Town Council and the Planning and
Environmental Commission to discuss a proposed amendment to Chapter 18.39 ol the Vail
Municipal Code ( Ski Base Recreation) and an amendment to the previously approved
development plan to allow lor the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base, located at
485 Vail Valley Drive / Tract F, VailVillage Sth filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th filing.
Applicantr Vail Associates,lnc., represented by David Corbin
Planner: Jim Curnune and Lauren Waterton
Bob Armour gave an overview and said that he would like to see the discussion follow lhe
memorandum which include:
A,Transportation/Circulation and Parking
1. Privatized Parking Structure
2. Employee Parking
3. Skier Drop-off/Pick-up Areas
4. Roadway/Pedestrian lmprovements
B.Neighborhood lssues
C.Employee Housing
D.Review Schedule
Bob Armour stated that Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton would make the initial presentation.
Bob Armour again stated he wanted to follow the discussion items listed in the memorandum and
reiterated that he wanted to narrow down the discussion today to the major policy issues identitied
in the statf memo and stated the applicants would be back foi future discussions.
Before beginning the presentation, Jim Curnutte stated that Larry Grafel, Greg Hall and Mike
McGee were present and available for questions.
Jim Curnutte reminded everyone that we were discussing an amendment to a plan that had
preMously been approved in the early 80's. Jim pointed out that the text amendments were located
in attachment No. 1 of the memorandum and the second element of the application, revisions to the
previously approved plan, were really the focus ol todays discussion.
Jim Curnutte stated that page 2 of the memo had the most substantial changes. They include:
- The proposed program for the Golden Peak Ski Base facility calls for a building ol
approximately 73,000 sq. ft., located virtually in the same location as lhe previously
approved building site. The residential portion of the building (6 condominiums) is
considerably larger than the original plan, expanded lrom approximately 13,000 sq. ft. of
GRFA to approximately 24,500 sq. ft. of GRFA in the new plan. The residential units are
Ft Yafyone\pec\riinuies\061 295
reviewed using the Conditional Use Permit findings. Additionally, the amount of retail and
conference/meeting room space has been expanded as compared to the previously
approved plans.
- Both ski lifts 6 and 12 are proposed for replacement as a part of this redevelopment plan.
Chair 6 is currently a double chair with a hourly capacity of 1 ,1 30 skiers per hour. lt_is_ _ _
proposed for replacement with a detachable quad chair lift with a hourly capacity ol2,250
bt<t6rs per hour. Chair 6 will be designed to allow skiers to unload at a midpoint on the top
of Goden Peak, or to continue on to the top terminal located near the base of Chai|I 1. In
the future, Chair t0 will be realigned and extended, ultimately enabling skiers to ride a 6 to
10 connection to the Two Elk Restaurant and China Bowl. The existing Chair 12 is also a
double chair with a hourly capacity of 960 skiers per hour. The proposed replacement chair
willbe either a triple or a quad chiir, with a slow loading speed to assist in the instruction of
... children and first time skiers. This lift is proposed to have a hourly capacity of 1,000 to.
., 1,400 skiers per hour. In addition to the'replacement of Chairs 6 and 12, the applicant is
. pioposing to ielocate the "poma" lift from its current location on the west side ol Chair 12 to
,. the Children's Center area.
"- The tSg-space surface parking lot, which is open to the public for a fee, is proposed to.
be replaced with a 1sO-space piivatized parking structure. This structure is proposed to be
apprdximatety 64,800 sq. ft. in size (32,400 sq. ft. on each of the two levels) and is partially
buried and surrounded on three sides with landscaping'
- The skier drop-off zone, shown on the 1984 plan, has been expanded and relocated to
the north side of the new building and parking structure. This skier drop-ott area has been
designed to accommodate approximatbly 30 vehicles. Some ol the spaces are depicted,on
tne dite plan as angled spaces and otheis are depicted as "active" drop-otf-spaces, which
are designed as an "airport style" drop-otf, maintaining a continuous flow of vehicles
through the area. -
- The four existing'tennis courts at the Golden Peak area are proposed to be removed in
conjunction with this redevelopment proposal. An agreement has been reached between
. the Vail Recreation District (VRD) and Vail Associates that calls for a cash payment to be
provided in order to cover the cost of relocation, resurfacing and construction of new
bourt(s) elsewhere in the Town of Vail. The number and location of the courts will be
deteririned by the VRD, with Ford Park being considered as the possible new location. The' 1984 approved development plan contemplated the possible relocation of one tennis court
to lhe Cilalet Road right-of-way. lt is the intenlion of the VRD to leave the exi{ing lennis
courts nexl to Chalet Road, but not to expand the tennis program at that site. Therefore, no
additionalcourts have been proposed in the chalet Road right-of-way.
- The Children's Center parking area has been expanded from 21 spaces to 28 spaces and
relocated to an area on the inside loop of the new dedicated bus lane'
- Vail Valley Drive is proposed to be relocated and realigned to allow for a new'Tour-way
intersection' at the existing Manor Vail entrance.
- Pedestrian and bicycle conneclions leading to the Golden Peak Ski Base are proposed for
improvement.
Jim Curnutte turned it over lo Lauren Waterton for a discussion of the background information
related to this property.
Bob Armour clarified fhat the zoning code lext revisions would not be a part of today's discussion.
Jim Curnutte agreed with Bob Armour.
F lpveryone\oecvninues\06 | 295
Lauren Waterton stated that in 1984 this plan was approved and the amendment to that proposal is
what we are discussing. Lauren waterton stated that in 1988 an amendment was approved to
make lhe Children's center a separate building. That this application is to further amend the
previous application.
Jim Curnutte stated that on page 6 of the memorandum, items A-D were the major criteria which
would be used in the luture to review the application.
Jlm Curnutte said we would not be getting into a detailed review of the criteria at this time and to
keep the discussion centered on the major policy issues. Jim stated that the purpose of this
dlscussion was to provide some direction to the staff and the applicant. Jim stated that
transportation, circulation and parking were the major issues today for discussion. Jim turned the
discussion over to the applicant, Vail Associates,lnc., represented by David Corbin.
Dave Corbin introduced members of Vail Associates, Inc. that were in the audience and also
members of Pierce, Segerberg Associates and Design Workshop that were present. Dave Corbin
explained that TDA and RRC were used by thern to provide base data and research but
representatives from those firms were not here today. Dave Corbin agreed with the scope of the
meeting and that there was an enormous amount of detail in the memorandum. Dave Corbin
stated that by using the printed information in front of you, general issues could be identified.
Dave Corbin, at this time, only took issue with the following 3 items:
1. That the parking should not be viewed as condominiumized, but a reserved parking product.
That there were a variety of ways to think about this parking, rather than condominiumized.
2. That the sidewalk to the soccer field not be considered lo be included as a part of their
application.
3. That the GRFA figtrre mentioned by statf in the memorandum was nol the same figure in
their application. -
Jim Curnune explained that the GRFA figure did not count common circulation area. However, he
poinled out that the GRFA discrepancy will be addressed at a later meeting.
Dave Corbin reiterated that this was clearly an amendment to the previously approved plan. The
design creativity of the project is restrained by restricted covenants. An amendment changed the
1984 zoning to allow for the Children's Center. He suggested not to consider changes in the uses
of the property now. A series of constraints were developed when the process began in light of
existing covenants. He asked what were the development goals? The basic premise was primarily
related to skiing operations first and foremost and not real estate. The goal is to buiH within the
1984 plan without increasing the building's mass, but only to revise the interior and add
underground parking. Beginning in February, 1994, these goals were articulated and are as
follows:
1. To balance the uses of ski portals (heavy use at Vista Bahn, peak loading periods).2. lmprove the guest, neighborhood and community experience to use this area and enjoy it
in the future.
3. ' Find a way to pay for these improvements such as sharing of expenses for ofl site
improvements.
Since February, 1994, VA undertook a series of studies to determine the public process and set up
meetings with property owners, and the Town Staff. VAs traffic studies were made available to the
Town. This is lhe first significant project to go before the town since the adoption of the Townlr'.A.
growth managemenl agreement and VA fully anticipated a detailed review of the application would
be a part of this application process. Dave Corbin stated that VA was proposing a four story
FLvoryonotsocvninuss\C6r i€5
building similar in size to the previously approved building that would house ski lockers, ski school,
food aid beverage and all other serviies'dssociated with-a ski portal. Six condominiums would be
added to generale revenue to pay for the project. The largest changes that would require time t0
review in ihis proposat dealt with various tian-sportation components involving lhe bus drop otf'
Children's Ceirtei and the parking structure. The need to balance this impact in a confined area
was important. There werb a vaiiety of solutions to be discussed. Also to be discussed were the
pedestiian conneclions between Gotden Peak and the surrounding Leighborhoods. Dave Corbin
'also mentioned that VA reached an agreement with the Recreation District regarding the Golden
Peak tennis courts. Dave Corbin then turned it over to Bill Kane ol Design Workshop.
Bill Kane gave an overview of the site planning. The eight transit modes needing to be ?^d9ressed
were the fhildren's Genter, general skier drop ofl, the Town ol Vail shuttle having over 40% of the
arrival mode for Golden Peak, the parking stiucture, VA employees, charter busses and taxis and
limos that needed to arrive in the site area. VR ownership is over 40 acres, however, VA really .
has onty 3.3 acres of base area to work with. Bill explain'ed thal the surrounding area would need,.
to accoinmodate the increase from 'l 100 persons per hour lo 2250 per hour with the upgrade of Lift
6, with primacy given to the Town of Vail shuttle and pedestrian qcc-e!s. 1500 people would. be
airivinij in the'peak hour and human activity that now processes 3000 people per day, would
.
procesi 5000 beople per day with the new portal. This is the only one of three majorportals.that
iits on a publii street. the iite plan addresses the demand for skier drop off. The TDA study
observed demand activities. This plan incorporates expected transit needs into the new plan.
Grading has determined the loading area. The load platform for chair.6 is at 8213 ft. That means
theie would be 18 ft. of grade chan-ge from the transit arrival area, which is at 8195 ft. Wide tread
itiirs
"re
planned. the'Cnitdren C6nter drop off would be highly managed. Much like an airport is
managed,'an attendant would be present to encourage all vehicles to move on . Because of this
aggreisiv'e management, tvyenty 6ight spaces on the loop (including some double parked spaces) .
wTtiOe proviOeO. inis would be'a v-ery etficient anangenienl. He mentioned a security booth would
be located at the entrance to the structure. Conceptually the top deck of the structure would be at
8207 leeland could be skiable terrain when covered. He pointed out the positive ideas of this plan
such as: plazas would aff6rd space for display tents during special evenls, Golden Peak would
finally be'clarified with a gleat entrance, sidewalk widening, which would enhance pedestrian
acceis, the 8'wide walkway system would keep skiers otl the streel, improved signage, relieve
pressure on the Vista Bann, F6rd Park and Manor Vail could be alternate trail locations to pick up
butlying parking and pedestrian circulation to the soccer field would finally be clarified. This
wrapped up Bill Kane's summary of the site plan which included skiing, response to covenants'
building, public transit and pedestrian access to the base area.
Bob Armour said the plan was nicely explained by Bill Kane and asked that Stafl and Council try
give the applicant an idea where we stood.
Merv Lapin understood that the plan was being given to the Council in August.
Dave Corbin said that was correcl.
Merv stated he had to leave and wished to express his comments now.
Merv summarized his thoughts. He said skier retail operations and skier food operations should be
limited to accessory, not destination services. Merv said VA should pay for the whole project.
lmprovements should mirror the streetscape plan. Merv was concerned about traffic impacts and
saiJ that it warrants more serious considentidn. The project seemed to be creating too much. in
too small ol an area, especially during key pick up times and drop off times. Merv is not a believer
of skier drop off at the base of the lifts. He doesn't want to encourage this convenience, since
everyone will Oe dropping otf there. Merv wants VA to provide parking for its employees. The
number of employees far exceeds the fee in lieu lo solve VAs parking problems. Merv is not
excited about'a cbndominiumized parking situation. He also stated that it was not a good example
for VA to fill up the soccer field parking lot with VA ski instructors and lift operators arriving at 7am
F:\errervone\Dacvni ndes\06 t 295
and then make a profit by selling the on-site parking spaces.
Dave Corbin asked Merv if the employee parking was resolved, would condominiumized parking be
acceptable?
Merv stated by having designated parking, bringing cars in will be encouraged, not discouraged.
Merv was reasonably pleased with how VA addressed its employee housing.
{ generat overview of the architecture was presented by Gordon Pierce.
There were four criteria that related a building to an environment:
1. neighborhood scale
2. easily understood by skiers
3. windows
4. interior
Gordon then explained the interior of the building, including the condominiums and their layout.
The drawings showed landscaping, balconies, pitched roofs with dormers and some flat roofs. The
roofs would be slate colored tile and the building would be mustard colored stucco. The stonework
would be similar to that at Mill Creek Circle.
Jim Lamont spoke representing the East Village Homeowners Association. He gave a brief
overview of his Associations involvement over the past two years. lt consisted of a volunteer group
of property owners. This group communicated with all the condominium associations in the area.
They lobbied to place Golden Peak on a high priority list for redevelopment and asked that it be
ahead of the Lionshead area. Each property owner communicated with VA during the last two
years before it came to Council. The neighborhood desires redevelopment, There are three
entities involved with redevelopment. They are Vail Associates, Town ol Vail and the Homeowners
Association. An investment is being made from Vail Associales and must also be made by the
individual property owners and the Town of Vail because this investment increases useability and
also the sales tax. The piincipal concerns of the Homeowners Association were the traffic
congestion. Jim pointed oi,ut that the HOA wished to install gate posls to identify individual
residential neighborhoods, not gated neighborhoods. The question ol the Homeowners Association
was whether or not lo be a part of the Vail Village pedestrian precinct.
Bob Armour slarled the discussion with the lirst question, should there be any parking on the site at
all?
Jeff Bowen said it didn't make sense to talk about one item at a time.
Sybil Navas agreed.
Bob Armour agreed with Sybil, but also said the discussion needed to start somewhere.
Jim Curnutte stated what was being proposed was 150 privatized spaces in a subslantially
underground structure.
Henry Pran said parking was a necessary evil and didnt see how you could increase a portal
without increasing the parking. The Children's Center continues to drive the activity at Golden
Peak and was the only portal where children could be dropped otf close in. Henry believed the
Children's Genter needed parking but what was shown didn't seem to work.
Kevin Deighan agreed with the necessity of parking.
Jefl Bowen had no further comments.
Greg Mollet agreed with parking.
Flderyonovecvninu€s\o6 1 295
Jan Strauch said there was a growing need for the.Ford Park and Ski Club Vail areas t0 have
parking. Jan said that we need to look at the bigger picture.
' Sybil agreed with the proposed privitized parking but pointed out that VA needed to address the
loss of 130 public sPaces.
'Peggy Osterfoss sald it was evident we needed parking, but to what extent.
Jim Lamont stated that cars in an underground structule were fine, but he doesn't want to see cars
visible.
- Dianne Milligan, the manager of Ramshorn Lodge agreed with Jim regarding the underground
.' structure that is landscaped. Her greatest concern was the drop otf issue.
All Seasons president, Al Southfield, agreed with Dianne and Jim.
All agreed that underground parking, not surface parking, was important.
- Chris Ryman wanted to have people call the parking structure^ "managedparking'instead of
i .ondom'iniumized or privitized'and said thal this would maximize usage.. Chris Ryman's vision of
managed parking would collectively lay out a definilion for summer or winter usage-
The iisue'deseries a better descri'ptioh, before defining uses, all of which can be determined later'
Susan Connelly stated that we need to distinguish between public and private or managed parking.
Dave Corbin views the structure as available to all the public, but with a fee.
Members of the public would pay a higher fee to have a reserved space.
Greg Amsden asked if thd need for parking is monetarily based. He suggested using the east side
of thl Children's Cenler fgr the parking location. He stated that we need to look a minimum 5-10
years down the road when it comes to addressing the parking situation. The 1999 Championships
ind the Ford Park Amphitheater would need futuie parking expansion. Greg thinks a lot of empty
parking spaces would exist with privatized parking.
Chris Ryman stated that only one time this year was lhe existing structure full and 25 times last
season per Larry Grafel's statistics'
Jeff Bowen wanted to address lhe major need at Golden Peak for parking and that is a main
consideration.
Kevin Deighan questioned the number of VA employees.
Dave Corbin said 314 employees are at Golden Peak on an average day, but the total is
anticipated 10 go over 400, He stated that all of these ligures were included in his letter to the
Town. He then-said it was critical for the success of the project to have parking at the Children's
Center.
Kevin Deighan said a drop-off and pick up situation causes twice the traffic of a fixed parking area.
Kevin has-a problem with'parking not beiirg available to the public; only available to the wealthy.
Greg Mofiet said that making parking exctusivitized would give the wrong impression to the public.
Greg also agrees with Kevin. He felt that the structure should be open to the public.
Henry Pratt agreed with Kevin and wanted summer usage to be totally public. He said that the
privitized parking is just displacing public parking without mitigating the loss. He thinks that the
Fleve4onc\pec\rninue3061 295
Children's Center parking should be moved to the east side of the building.
Bob Armour pointed out that when a condominium owner wasn't there, a parking space would sit
empty.
Jan Strauch was in favor of prlvate parking. He was not In favor of parking for the day or weekend
skier. He wanted to know how much parking would actually be needed. He suggested that the
name of the structured parking include the words "adequate and supplemental'.
Sybil Navas thought private pArking was fine, but not taking away the existing 130 spaces lhat are
now currently available to public. They need to be replaced somewhere else, perhaps at the
soccer field. She said no double parking at the Children's Center, consider re-designing.
Peggy Osterfoss said that she isn't convinced that private parking will decrease traftic. Peggy is
also concerned with the loss of the 130 spaces that are now available to the public. She also
wants to know what would happen to reserved spaces unused when an owner is not present- Who
is responsible for replacing the 130 spaces?
Jan Strauch suggested a better connection from the project to the vista Bahn.
Chris Ryman said that 75% of Vail's guests are repeat visitors and therefore, are easy to educate
regarding the project. lt is easy to educate people with children who use only Golden Peak. User
groups for Golden Peak are those with children. The Vista Bahn has different user groups. The
project is not to encourage people to use Golden Peak; but to improve upon what's already there.
It's not meant to be an access to the Vista Bahn.
Greg Amsden lhinks the new project will increase user numbers of all user groups.
Chris Ryman stated that dwelling on the loss of the existing 130 parking spaces is making t00 big
of an issue and won't mdke any difference with the overall parking. He reminded everyone not t0
get hung up on this. A paiking lot will not make or break the ski area. Busses will always fill and
pedeslrians will continue to walk.
Bob Armour asked if the displaced '130 cars would fill the parking slructure in the winter?
Lany Grafel said he didn't have those figures with him.
Chris Ryman stated that the Lionshead structure would then be maximized because the 130
displaced cars would have a domino etfect. This shift of parked cars to Lionshead would bring
increased Town revenue to Lionshead.
Jim Lamont stated a zero nel increase in tralfic, no visual cars and managed parklng are slated
with this project. ll lhe Town of Vail is unwilling to break with traditions, we cant move forward. He
suggested the Council and Staff review the material that Vail Associates, with much research, had
prepared.
Dianne Milligan agreed that a parking overflow into Lionshead would show increased revenue.
However, she couldn't help believing there would be increased usage in Golden Peak with the new
attractive Portal.
Peggy suggested a park and ride situation.
Dave Corbin suggested that,in the future, it would all balance out with the Lionshead
redevelopment.
Diana Donovan thinks this project should be held accountable for lhe 130 lost parking spaces.
Flovsryone\Fcvlf ntnes\06 | 295
,!:.
:
;,4
she said that our parking structures really do not have excess capacity. Reserved spaces will
promote constantbrivinj'in and out of thd structure more trequently,.sinc_e drivers know their space
is reserved. This wouldie very attractive to realtors. Diana thinks the structure should be public.
She also feels there should be'better communication between all parking structures. She would
like to see a staffed two level open parking slruclure at the soccer field, She feels it would be an
inexpensive alternative and atf6rd d great'iocation for visitors to Ford Park in summer and skiers in
winter.
Bob Armour asked if there was any other public input regarding the managed parking?
Jim Lamont noted that there could be many interpretations of managed parking.
Jim Curnutte said it would be lough for Staff to do a technical review, since we don't know what
minig"d parking is. He asked V-A to provide a very detailed explanation of how managed parking
works..
Bob Armour suggested that Dave Corbin come up with a plan explaining what exactly managed
parking is.
Dave Corbin said that since they wished to fast track this project, VA will provide specifics.
Mike Mollica pointed out that we can't be on a fast track until we know what the animal is'
Chris Ryman apologized for VA being short, since they have been working on this for t\/o years'
He wanis staff io understand VA's position. 25h ot guests staying in Lionshead are driving over t0
Colden peak to drop their children otf. The origination of Devo in Golden peqtgF poor planning
in Lionshead have iontributed to Golden Peak-being so congested. Moving DEVO west to Beaver
Creek and out of the area would help.
Sybit Navas was concernid about the projects projected 2 minute drop-off at the Children's Center.
She said small children neied a rninimuh i5 minut6s to get them into and organized for the day at
the center. She is very uncomfortable with the Children's Center drop-off Part ol the proposal.
Jim Curnutte suggested discussing the three drop off issues. Staff suggested a parking structure
be considered between the Children's Center and Ski Club Vail.
Jan Strauch said a drop off is opening up new uses and maybe there shouldn't be one.
Jim Gurnutte said the overall management system of the drop-off areas needs to be better defined.
Peggy Osterfoss said the adult skier drop-otf should be located elsewhere.
Greg Amsden is not opposed lo an adult drop-off. His concern is congestion at the Children's
Center area.
Jetf Bowen stated lhat we need to make it convenient to get to the ski slopes, not easier to get to
Golden Peak. Jetf has a problem with the children needing to cross the bus lane.
Kevin Deighan agrees with Jeft regarding children walking in the bus area.
Greg Moffet wants long term parking at the Children's Center and not a drop-off situation.
Henry Pratt suggested parking for the adult dropotf be located on other side ol the Children's
Center.
Henry Pratt thinks with lhe Far Easl development, the Golden Peak portal will become more
o
lmportant in the years lo come.
Jim Lamont thought management solutions should be addressed, ie: four persons lo a car. He also
pointed out that whatever ultimately gets approved will need on-going monitoring.
Diana Donovan thought the east end of Vailwould become elitist and the east end willget busier.
We keep forgetting that skiers come from a lower altitude and don't want to walk too far, since they
are not acclimated_
Peggy Osterfoss thinks that converting Vail Valley Drive to one-way might work.
Greg Moffet suggested burying the bus tane.
Chris Ryman said typically there are four weeks, of very heavy use and Saturday and Sunday and
that makes up the busy usage of Golden Peak. A tiered management, ie: to have children
slaggered for race arrivals, devo etc. is an option. Destination guests, children and specialty
prOgram children having drop offs in separate areas would be an example of tiered management.
Jim Curnutte asked if the bus drop off is appropriate at lhis location.
Bob Armour said he is concerned with children intermingling with bus traffic.
Jim Curnutte asked if buses should have their own lanes on Vail Valley Drive. lf there is a
dedicated bus lane, is it property sited?
Henry Pratt thinks it is a good location and does not feel a dedicated bus lane is necessary until a
problem arises.
Greg Motfet suggested bqses underground.
Kevin Deighan suggestedihe bus lane on the inside lane and children being dropped off on the
outside lane or the opposite of what's shown.
Dave Corbin said it physically doesn't work with buses on the inside lane, because of the lack of
turning radius.
Bob Armour reminded everyone that this meeting is to bring up concerns even if Dave Corlrin has
already addressed lhese concerns.
Kevin Deighan said we needed to address the safety issue.
Jetf Bowen stated the prospect of a child running in tront of a bus is an issue.
Greg Amsden is OK with the bus location.
SybilNavas agrees that bus safety needs to be addressed and is concerned that parking is
insufficient foi the Children's Center.
Jan Strauch said it is necessary to separate these two uses. He was led to believe Chair 6 was
moving west.
Chris Ryman said Chair 6 found its way naturally back lo this location.
Peggy Osterfoss said it would be desirable to separate the bus and Children's Genter uses.
Busses going around the curve al Manor Vail is not deshable. Perhaps the busses should move
east.
Fi€rrarygne$ec\fi lnd€\06 | 295 t1
Bob Armour said the turning radius of the new buses is a significant lactor. He doesn't like it as it
now stands.
Jim Lamont said convenience and efficiency is the main reason for the location.
Dave Schnegelberger (from the Seasons) felt that the board members are being to.o biased
regarding thd Child-ren''s Center issues and said that they need to look more globally at all of the
issues associated with the project.
Jim Curnutte Said that since there are numerous off-site improvements and impacts associated with
the proposed Golden Peak redevelopmenl, staff will definitely be looking at the project from a
global perspective.
Jan Strauch noted that one of the weakest parts of the plan is the four way ht Manor Vail. He
. asked the applicant to lake a harder look at resolving traffic conflicts al this area.
Sybil Navas said the impact to Vail Valley Drive is important and vehicular and pedestrian needs
must be addressed.
Peggy Osterfoss reminded everyone that the project presents a great opportunity for.the Town, VA
andine neighborhood. Howevei, she pointed oui tnat tne private covenants aPpear to be stitfeling
design creaiivity, She said that this expanded dialog of impacts and opPortunities is in the
community's interest.
Mike Mollica said covenants keep it within boundaries . Arbitrary lines may need modilications to
covenants before going any further.
Dave Corbin said we need to design alternatives. All owners need to approve ol any final decision.
Larry Lichliter, Nola Dyal gnd Chrii Ryman had modifications to the covenants done in 1984.
Dissent would be formidaQle, if it was to be done again'
Jim Lamont said he is not in favor of going back to square one. Jim said that to go back and start
over would be a major effort.
Bob Armour, nol to be a devils advocale, said people may say to live with your 1984 decision.
Jim Curnutte brought up employee housing. Staff is interested in requiring this redevelopment lo
provide emPloYee housing'
Jan Strauch agreed and asked VA to find a way to provide some employee housing. He pointed
out that we always have to look at employee housing.
Sybil Navas agreed with Jan and said that VA should try to provide housing where you can walk to
lown. To keep people in town would cut down on car usage.
Peggy Osterfoss wants to require housing on al least a bus line, not necessarily on site.
Greg Amsden echoes Peggy's point of view.
Jefl Bowen said that VA has done a great job regarding employee housing in the lower valley and
suggested not puning this stipulation on the approval.
Kevin Deighan and Greg Moffet agree with Jeff.
Henry Pratt agrees with PeggY.
E{aEtu h6\MAhitun..\66! ?qq
Chris Ryman said a lot of the space in the redevelopment plan is dead space and is nol belng used
by employees. Chris reminded everyone that 150 VA employees were recently relocated down to
the Seasons in Avon.
Bob Armour mentioned that Category lllwill bring in more tratfic to Golden Peak.
Peggy Osterfoss said a real issue surrounding housing is lo expect developers to mitigate the
impacts on housing associated with their particular proposal. This is not a low budget operation in
relation to associated impacts.
Jim Lamont said it would make sense lo rezone immediate neighborhoods for employee housing.
Jim Curnutte noted that a very aggressive meeting schedule would lollow depending on the results
trom this meeting. Prior to the DRB meeting, it will be necessary lo come back to the PEC tor
several additional worksessions.
Susan Connelly thanked Council for joining the PEC at todays worksession.
Jan Strauch mentioned that the bike path to Northwoods goes nowhere and wants VA to work on
addressing this in the project.
Mike Mollica suggested another joint worksession between Council and the Planning and
Environmental Commission
Dave Corbin said that he doesn't want to wait until next month for a meeting. lf this is a realistic
project for 1996, we need 1o lake less than three week intervals between meetings.
Bob Armour said the constraints of publishing a meeting would prohibit weekly meetings from
occurring.
Bob Arrnour asked the applicant if anything was left out.
Dave Corbin said no, but ilants to move forward as expeditiously as possible.
Jan Strauch asked about the architectural design.
Jim Lamont said this was more mature than the l g84 architectural plan.
Bob Armour thanked the public for their input.
Jetf Bowen moved that ltems 3 & 4 be tabted.
Greg Moffet seconded the motion.
The motion was unanimous, with a vote of 6-0.
3. A request for a selback variance to allow for an addition to a residence located at 1390
Greenhill CourUlot 12, Glen Lyon.
Applicant Summit Vacation Properties
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
TABLED TO JUNE 26TH
Ftpvoryonetsec\minu€sD6 I 295 13
4. A request for a floodplain modification to allow for the development of a residence and
. rebchtion of a drainage ditch located a|3797 Lupine Drive / Lots 4 & 5 Bighorn
Subdivision/Second Addition.
Applicant Chloe Moran
Planner: RandY Stouder
TABLED INDEFINTTELY
Bob Armour asked if there were any changes to the PEC minutes of May 22' 1995.
Bob Armour changed the May'8, 1995 PEC minutes to read Vice chairman in section 12.
5. Approval of May 8, 1995 and May 22, 1995 PEC minutes.
Bob Armour made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
Greg Moffet seconded the motion.
The motion was unanimous, with a vote of S-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30p.m.
Ftsvetyonelectinulssv)6 t 295 14
+I
THIS ]TEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on June 12, 1995, at 2:00 P.M. in tlre Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
1. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an automatic teller machine to be
located at 263 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot E, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: David Gorsuch and Beth Golde, representing Vail Bank
Planner: George Ruther
2 A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition to a residence located at 1390
Greenhill CourULot'12, G.len Lyon.
Applicant Summit Vacation Properties
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a floodplain modification to allow for the development of a residence
located at3797 Lupine Drive / Lots 4 & 5 Bighorn Subdivision/Second Addition.
Applicant: Chloe Moran, Planner: Randy Stouder
4. A request for a joint worksession with the Town Council and the Planning and
Environmental Commission to discuss a proposed amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the
Vail Municipal Code ( Ski BaseRecreation) and an amendment to the previously approved
development plan to allow for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base, located at
485 Vail Valley Drive / Tract F, Vail Village Sth filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th filing,
Applicant: Vail Associates Inc., represented by David Corbin
Planner: Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton
MwrFl6r6ryone\pednotic€s\061 295
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
286 Bridge Street, Inc.
A Colorado Corporation
6th Ave,nue
Deiray Beaclq Florida 33483
Pepi And Sheika Gramshammer
231 E. Core Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
P& R Enterprises
Ath: RonRiley
228 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
SlifqBuilding LLC
Ath: Rodney Slifer
230 Bridge Sheet
Vail, CO 81657
Charles and Elizabeth Koch
P.O. Box2256
Witchita, KS 67201
Riohard & Jean Dulude
507 WelohRoad
Coming,N.Y. 14830
Oume,rs ofduplexon:
Lot 19 A&B Glenlyon Subdivision
(1462 Greenhill Court)
Douglas & Joan Kirkpatick
39955 Colorado Blvd.
Englewood, CO 801l0
Mr. Jack S. Flowers
214 N. Ilawaiian Ave
Wilnington, CA 90748
Owneroflot l1
Gle,nlyon Subdivision
(1469 Greenhill Coud)
I
F. D. Wilkins
2655 Briarwood
Boulder, CO 80303
Onner of W. Side of duplex on:
Iot 12 Glenlyon Subdivision
(1390 Gre€nhill Court)
DiammdHomes
P.O. Box 1716
Engtewoo{ CO 80150
Oqmeroflot 13
Glealyon Subdivisim
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June 12, 1995
AGENDA
Prolect Orientation Lunch
Site Vislts
Gorsuch ATM
Golden Peak Ski Base
Drivers: Jim & Mike
Publlc Hearing
11:30p.m.
12:30 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an automatic teller machine to be located
at 263 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot E, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: David Gorsuch and Beth Golde, represenling Vail Bank
Planner: George Ruther
2. A request for a joint worksession with the Town Council and the Planning andEnvironmental
Commission to discuss a proposed amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code
( Ski BaseRecreation) and an amendment to the previously approved development plan to
allow for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base, located at 485 Vail Valley Drive /
Tract F, VailVillage 5th filing and Tract B, VailVillage 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Associales Inc., represented by David Corbin
Planner: Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton
3. A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition to a residence located at 1390
GreenhillCourULot 12, Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Summit Vacation Properties
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
TABLED TO JUNE 26TH
4. A request for a floodplain modification to allow for the development of a residence and
relocation of a drainage ditch located at 3797 Lupine Drive / Lots 4 & 5 Bighorn
Subdivision/Second Addition.
Applicant:Chloe Moran
Planner: Randy Stouder
. TABLED INDEFINMLY
5. Approval of May 8, 1995 and May 22, '1995 PEC minutes.
F:\ovsryoneb€c\ag€n&s\061 295
t
TO;
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
IIEIIORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
June 12, 1995
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the installation and operation of
an Automatic Teller Machine located at the Gorsuch Building, 263 East Gore
Creek Drive, Lot E, Block 5, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicanl: WestStarBanuBethGoldePlanner: George Ruther
t.
W
DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
business as Vail a Conditional Use Permit
263 East Gore Creek Drive. Lot lock 5, vail
Filing.
Statf has determined that an Automatic Teller Machine falls under the cateqory of "Banks and
. Financial hstitutions" (as described in the Town of Vail Municipal Code). Ihistwe_ol_lJEe_tg
subiectto Planning and EnvironmentalCommission (PEC) Conditional Use Permit review and
3DpfgElglgl-tg.Eging located on the "first floor or street level" within the Commercial Core I
(CCl) Zone Disricl Therefore. the appllcant is requestinq a Conditional Use Permit to
Install and operate an automatic teller machine in the CCI zone district. Banks and
Financial Institutions are permitted uses on all of the levels of buildings within the CCI Zone
District.
.As shown on the attached drawings. thq ATM urould be located on the south side of the Gorsuch
Building. immediately adjacent to East Gore Creek Drive. The teller machine would be glaced on
an p'isting blank wall between two retail displav windows. The machine will be mounted flush
.with the existino exterior wall and. therefore, would not add any new cornmercial souare footaoe
to the building. A 12-inch countertop is prooosed with the ATM on top of a trash receptacle
of the Gorsuch
would be with wood
To orovide adeouate customer access to the ATM machine. the apolicant is proposino to cover a
portion of the existino exterior stairwell with a reinforced concrete slab, t!_bg_CevglCdlgilh
pavers.would be matched to the
alono East Gore Creek Drive. The bric-k paver construction proposed would be installed to
@hebuilding.Theareawou|ddrainintotheexistingdrainpana|ong
East Gore Creek Drive, thus eliminating any potential icing problems during the winter months.
o
The applicant has indicateel-thalt_additional stone veneer would be added to the building io-the
@3!Ldjt!9!al stone added to the buildino would match the stone
currently on the building. Additionally, to provide shelter fiom he weather for the customers
using the ATM, the applicant is proposing to extend an existing, second floor deck located above
the ATM. The deck would be extended approxirnately six feet to the east to accomplish this goal.
Besides providing protection from the weather, the deck extension would also serve as a location
to install a 3 sq. ft. hanging sign directly above the machine. The sign would be suspended lrom
the deck by short lengths of chain. The sign and the associated lighting would be subject to
review by the Design Review Board.
II. RELATED REVIEW CR]TERIA FOR TI{IS REOUEST
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town of Vail Municipal
Code. ln addition to the conditional use criteria, staff has included criteria from the zoning code
and the Vail Comprehensive Plan, as we believe this will help the PEC in the evaluation of the
Conditional Use Permit request.
A. THE TOWN OF VAIL MUNIGIPAL CODE
The Gorsuch Building is located in the CCI zone district. According to Section 18.24.010
of the zoning code, the purpose of the CCI district is:
"to provide sites and to maintain the unique character ol the Vail Village
commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a
predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Gore ldistrict is intended
to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the
permitted types of buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe
site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and
preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on
pedestrian ways and public green ways, and to ensure continuation of the building
scale and architectural gualities that distinguish the village.'
Banks and Financial Institutions on the "first floor" or "street level'shall be oermitted in
the ccl zone district subject to the issuance of a conditional use Permit in accordance
with provisions ol Chapter 18.60. For the PEC's referen@, the Conditional Use Permit
pupose statement indicates that :
"in order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the obiectives ol this title,
specified uses are permifted in certain districts subject to the granting of a
Conditional Use Permit. Beca'use of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect
to the purposes of this title and with respect to their atfects on surrounding
properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure
compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and
surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the
various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the
Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional
uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will
not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be
devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permit shall
be denied."
(
o
B. VAIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Several elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan indirectly address Banks and Financial
lnstihJtions . The relevant elements and sections are listed below :
1. Vail Land Use Plan
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled
environment, maintaining a balance between
residential, commercial and recreational
uses to serve both the visitor and the
permanent resident.
The cornmunity should emphasize its role as
a destination resort while accommodating
day visitors.
The ski area owner, the business community
and the town leaders should work together
closely to make existing facilities and the
town function more efficiently.
The ski area owner, the business community
and the town leaders should work together
to improve facilities for day skiers.
Services should keep pace with increased
growlh.
SeMces should be adjusted to keep pace
with the needs ol peaked periods.
6.3
Vail Village Master Plan
2.4 Objective:Encourage the development of a variety of
new commercial activities that are
compatible with existing land uses.
Encourage the continued upgrading,
renovation and maintenance of existing
lodging and commercial facilities to better
serve the needs of our guests.
2.5 Objective:
III, CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60 of the Municipal Code, the Community Development Department
Statf recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit request to allow for the installation
and operation of an Automatic Teller Machine to be located on the south side of the Gorsudr
Building, 263 East Gore Creek Drive, Lot E, Block 5, VailVillage 'lst Filing, based upon the
following factors:
2.1
2.2
2.3
6.1
2.
Gonsideration of Factorc:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development obiectives of
the Town.
Staff believes the proposed Automatic Teller Machine, in the location
proposed by the applicant, will have a positive impact on the development
objectives of the Town. At this time, tre nearest location of an Automatic
Teller Machine to the Village Core is in the lobby of the FirstBank of Vail
Building, located on vail Road (directly west of the sonnenalp Hotel). The
proposed ATM is not only convenient in its relation to the Village Core, it is
also located near one of the busiest pedestrian intersections in the Town
of Vail (Gore Creek Drive and Bridge Street). lt is Staff's beliel that this
ATM will not only be used by visitors and tourists, but it will be
convenienfly located for use by employees working in the Village Core.
Staff believes that the proposed location of the ATM, approximately 13-112'
from the edge of asphalt of Gore Creek Drive, will allow for the convenient
use of the ATM by numerous customers without creating
a congestion problem on East Gore Creek Drive. The area immediately in
front of the ATM is sufficient enough in size to accommodate numerous
customers without forcing waiting ATM customers to stand in the way of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic flows.
The effect of the use on light and air, distrlbution ol populaUon,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facalities, and other public fdcilities needs.
The proposed Automatic Teller Machine would have little or no negative
impact on the items listed above.
Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffac flow and control,
access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the strcet and
parking areas.
The proposed Automatic Teller Machine would have little or no negative
impact on the items listed above.
2.
3.
o
Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relatlon to surroundlng uses.
As mentioned previously, Statf believes that the proposed ATM would
have a positive impact on the area. Statf does not believe that the
installation and operation of an ATM in the location proposed by the
applicant would have any negative effects upon the character of the area.
The area is commercial in nature and it is not uncommon to see ATM'S
located in commercial areas. In fact, staff believes that the installation
and operation of the ATM in this location would provide for a convenient,
and much needed, service to both visitors and locals alike.
B. Findings
The Planning and Environmental Commisslon shall make the followlng findings
before grantlng a conditional use permit:
1. That fte proposed location of he use is in accordance wifr the purposes
of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, salety, or welfare or malerially injurious to properties or
impro\remenF in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
a
4.
Nc( -,'\\'t%'D
IV. STAFF RECOIIMENDATION
Staff reconimendation for this request is approval. Statf finds that the applicant's request
complies with all of the above criteria and findings necessary for granting a Conditional Use
Permit approval in the CCI Zone Distict, as well as the relevant elements of the Vail
Comprehensive Plan. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to grant an
approval of the applicanfs request for the ATM, the staff would recommend that the approval
carry with it fie following conditions:
1. That the applicant monitor the ATM area daily to insure the area remains
free of trash and debris.
2. That the applicant complete and submit a Design Review Board sign
application for the proposed WestTeller sign.
3. That all areas of the stainless steel housing be either painted or covered in
wood to reduce the possibility of reflection and glare of the machine.
Fry - Tru$6h .i).zobrc,; r
, ^-67.] a^e, De-g- i*T>,x;.,.rrr,,c€.t \. I
P. \everyon€\pec\res\atn. 612
o
t"'
T\..'\
' ;;.\
ii.'l I
9F$ tgrxE tt )Lrorlr?! 39YtL AooM
1,
J.
?t4-
2/
7u
^1 <
td=o1tJ
3u
*F
d1
t7
26
r4n
>Ht-4
F\Ja
I
!
7
J
A
i
a..i
Irr\t2
a-
Ii
ag
2,i
J
i4
U
tt
?
.J'
F:'..t ii
--*-
t..i
i
^on)av.'>
u,*
<t)
o::
UIJFui
o :?'Ri;:r'+brevised LOl5l92 Date of Application:
Date of PEC Meetings
APPLICATIO FOR COIIDITIONAL USE PERI.IIT Hltf 1 :
OF PROPoSAL: LEGALT Lot E, Block 5, Vail Villaqe First
A.
l|
F.
. t:."_'1ff
::i:rEfi::i"::"t:.;;!iired ror anv project required t"mVttt,ii,ii' ;i" v' v[f I'
The application wilL not be accepted untll all information ig submitted.
NAME OF APPLICANT: Vail Bank (a6 of June 1. 1995 Weststar Bankl
ADDRESS! log South Frontage Road West. Suite 100, VaiL CO 81657
PHONE: 9?0-476-4500
B. NAME OF APPLICANT,S REPRESENIATIVE: Beth Golde
ADDRESS: 108 South Frontage Roed West, Suite 100, VaiL CO 81657
PHoNE! 970-476-4600
Gorsuch Ltd. by
NAltlE OF OWNER(S) I David corsuch
oWnER(S) SIGNATURE (s) s
ADDRESS :
PHoNE! 970-476-2294
LOCATION
Filing
ADDRESS:
A descrlptlonits operatingthe use
I
FEE 92oo.oo PAID: s20o.0o cx #_1ft!${ nt
The fee nust be paid before the Department of Community
Development will accept your proposal.
Stamped, addreesed envelopes of the names of owners of allproperty adJacent to the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY
BEHfND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a liet of names and mailing
AddTegses. THE APPLICANT 9IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT OWNERS
AND CORRECT ADDRESSES.
TT PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE :
A pre-application conference with a planning staff member is strongly
suggested t.o determine if any additional information is needed. Noapplication will be accepted unlegs it is completed (must include aII
iteme required by the zoning administrator). It ie the applicant'ssibllity to make an appointment wtlL!!e staff to f-i.a!
III. PLEASE NO?E THAT A COUPIJEIE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL
PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NU},IBER OF CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) MAY
STTPULATE. AI.,L CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I{UST BE CO},IPLIED !{ITH BAFORE A
BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED.
Four (4) copies of the following information must be submitted:
of the precise
characterietics
tible with other
nature of the
and measures
l.es rn
impact of the use on devel
Torrtn .
proposed use and
proposed to make
the vicinitv.
The description must also address:
Relationship and
obJectiveE of the
Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of
population, transportatlon facilities, utilities,
schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other
publlc i.irittti." and public facilities needs. 'E5gt
tr
needs.
Effect upon traffic, with particular reference tocongestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and
convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverabil ity, and fqllgyal of snow from the st
and. Pq:5
Effect upon
proposed usebulk of the
uses.
the character of the area in
ig to be located, including
propoged use in relation to
which the
the scale and
surround ing
A site plan at a ecale of at least 1" = 2O' showing proposed
development of the site, including topography, buildinglocations, parking, traffic cLrculatLon, useable open space,
,h*,ft$-9.f;ffinffffifi.and ut i I it ies and drainase f eature s . E'SE?
plans. ?ffif
verify ownership and eagements.tLrLSf
If the building is condominiumized, a l-etter from thethe proposal must becondominium association in support of
submitted to staf f.
6. Any additlonal material necessary for the review of theapplication as determined by the zoning administrator.
** For interior modifications, an improvement survey
and site plan may be waived by the zonJ-ngadministrator.
TIME RAQUIREMENTS
A.'. The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th
Mondays of each month. A complete application form and all
accompanying material (as described above) must be submitted a
minimum of four (4) weeks prior to the date of the PEC public
hearlng. No incomplete applications (as determined by the zoningadministrator) will be accepted by the planning etaff before orafter the designated eubmittal dat.e.
B. AII PEC approved conditional uae permits shall lapse ifconstruction is not commenced within one year of the date of
approval and diligently pursued to completion, or lf the use for
which the approval is granted is not commenced within one year.
A. If this application requires a separate review by any local, Stateor Federal agency other than the Town of VaiI, the application feeshall be increased by $200.00. Examples of such review, mayinclude, but are not limited to: colorado Department of Highway
AcceEE Permits, Army corps of Engineers 404, etc.
B, The applicant shall be responeible for paying any publishing fees
which are in excess of 50* of the application fee. If, at the
applicant's request, any matter is postponed for hearing, causingthe matter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shalI be paid by the applicant.
C. Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to
have significant design, land u6e or other issues which may have aeignificant impact on the community may require review by
consultants other than town staff. Should a determination be made
by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any appllcation, Community Development may hire an outsidecongultant; it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay
hlm or heri and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by theapplicant at the tlme he/she files his/her application with the
Coflnunity Development Department. Upon completion of the review
of the appllcat!-on by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded
by the applicant for payment of the consultant which have not beenpaid to the consultant shall be returned to the applicant-
ExpenEeE Lncurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded bythe applicant shall be pald to the Town by the applicant within 30
days of notification by the Town.
4.
5.
elevations
DESIGII REVIEW BOARI'
o
APPLI
o
COLORAIX'CATIOII - TOIIII OF VAIL,
-ir,Y lF'f' ts
o*rrr."r, *rr..an ro*" ,n *n- o" "o"ootr, "o* *-n@
I. PROi'ECT I FORMATIOII:
ADDRESS: 263 East Gore Creek Drl-ve, Vai1. CO 81557
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot E, Block 5: VaiI Village First Filing
ZONING3 Commercial Core 1 Dietrict
NAME OF APPLICANT: Vail Bank fag of June 1, 1995 Vleststar Bank)
ADDRESS: 108 South Frontage Road West, Suite 100, VaiI. CO 81657
PHoNE: 970-476-4500
NAl,lE OF APPLICANT's REPRESENTATM: Beth colde
ADDRESS! 108 south Frontage Road West. suite 1O0. Vail, co 81557
PHoNE: 970-476-4500
NAIIE OF oWNER(S): Gorsuch, Ltd. byDavid Gors uch
DATE RECEIWD!
DATE OF DR8 I{EETING:
A.
TYPE OF REVIEW:
W
B.
c.
D.
!|
H.
ov{!rER(s) srcNATnRE:
ADDRESS :
PHONE: 970-47 6-2002
APPI.ICAIIO}IS WIIJJ NOT BE PROCESSED IIITEOI''T O9IltER' S SIGNATURE
I. CondominLum Approval if appllcable.
II. PRE-APPLICATION ltEEfI Gs A Pre-appllcation meeting with a member of theplanning staff l-s encouraged to determl-ne if any additional applicationinformation is needed. It is the appll-cant's responsibility to make an
appolntment with the staff to detelmine if there are additionaleubmittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE application willetreamline the review process for your project. A pre-apglication
meetino vraB done on April 1.9, 1995 with Jim Cufnutte.
I I I . II'PORTAIII I{O ICE REGARDING AIIIJ STIBI'IISSIONS TO TNE DRB I
Not apolicable.
Not applicable.
Not appl icable.
A.
B.
c.
rv.
D. The followlng items may, at the digcretion of the zoningadministrator, be approved by the CommunLty Development Departmentstaff (i.e., a formal hearing before the DRB may not be required):
a. llindows, skylights and similar exterior changes which do not
al.ter the existing plane of the building; and
b. Building additione not vigible from any other lot or public
space. At the tLme such a proposal ie submitted. applicants
must include letterE from adjacent property ownerEi and/or
from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condomLnium
aesociation stating the aesociatl-on approvee of the
addit ion .
E. Not appl icable.
F- Not appl icable,
Not apol icable.
UII'IOR AIJTERAIIONS TO TEE EXTERIOR OF BUII;DINSS .
AIrgI lcable--need sketches which clearlv convey the redevelopment
pt:oposal and t.he Locati.on.
Gign Review Action Fth
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone'. \cL-',-zt f --".to-.'l F.r..., t/
er"nit""Vg#"t)ad ress and P hon e :
..ta+ I u-t .* ,5* - /fD '-/ o.-l t , 4" 8/6$:7 "
LegalDescrlption:nt E Block 5 gubdivisionV+',-tx.,l itL-ctf*/4oneDistrict (12
Prqect Street Address:
Comments:
*ooonrrr B-. *--'r- @til"
Seconded by:
flnonrovar
! Disapproval
fl Staff Approval
Corditions:
on ' 4/Z t/ qs DRB Fee p,"-p ia Z3 . 6--zr"J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
RECEIPT- lTI
DATE
RECEIVBD FROM
{0s?s
-a=t+f-i i:tF ii{? I t
1'!i :-r+ : i=:-:Eaf : ri 3':t
rlri,_,r ,r. r r'r-;
'-lt--JL:
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
department ol community development
TO BE FILLEO OUT COMPLETELY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
I autorr'rc I pluuerNc
Ei ElEcrRtcll ! FouNDAnoNn "F66|T'Ff&NroB *
LEGAL
]esc.
t oT --Pkl.--l-f
FILING E.J!sx.--
JoBNAME: VAIL BANK REMODEL EP
OWNER r'rrue VAIL NATL BANK
SAME
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY VAIL 81657 PH.XXXX
ARCHITECT FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
ctw PH.
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.
l.r.r*,"0.
CONTRACTOR
F1RM NEI.I ELECTRIC
TowN oF vArL REG. No. 1Io-E
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
TELE.
NOTE - COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
DATE JANUARY 23. T995
71 95PERMIT.NO.
LTYPE OF CONSTRUCTTON lll lll lV V
2, OCCUPANCY GROUP ABEH IRM
DIVISfON 122a34
GENERAL OESCRIPTION OF WORK :
REMODEL
TYPE GROUP G-R.F.A. VALUATION PERMIT FEES
<r-\)ss
EWO ALTERATION ( )O( AODITIONAL() REPAIR(
DWELLING UNITS
--
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
HEIGHT IN FT
-
NO. FIREPLACES
INSULATION:THICKNESS R-VALLUE
ADDITIONAL PEBMITS NEEDED:
RECREATION FEE
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
_EBI{S!_GLALZLS _ 1-e3-js_ __
,ILOING OFFICIAL DATE
ING ADMINISTRATOR
& AUILDING NOTES:
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other.ftdinances of own applicable thereto.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the intormation required,
completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as reguired is correct. I
agree to comply with the informalion and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state
laws, and to build this structure according to the Tgwn's zoning and subdivision codes, design
,aCTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
TH
"eppaoveo ../i:''tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
tr FOUNDATION i STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
..l BOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H, TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
DATE INSPECTOR
t! -ub -,\b.,-"8 - a?p" tA\
I i i56 N0 .007 P.0l
Lagal Descrlptloni tqt
JOb AddT€BE:
Blo€k-*- niltns@
Ptr./-fsl$c56
Ph,
t,-i plumblng contrflohor!
-fi 8;oo-
./ vv.rrdYr. Y
owners Namei ftf,!'zl#^' ftrr+ - -rddreeor
Arohlteot r
Geherdl D€scrlptlonr , R, r^^"111-.t-
?fork class! [ ]-uew I J-AlterAtton td-eddttlonal I J-Repalr [ ]-other
i' Nurnber of, DwElllng Unltet *- Number of Accamnrodqtlon unlts:
-
l.
I gmuer and T1rya ar FlrdplaeeEs Gas Ap,pllancee . - cas t,ogs- wood,/Pallet-
I ,T*****ttf***********l**r*******r*r VIDUAIIONS r*t*f***r*r*rtrr***********rr*lt*
!i !,ullllMgt l*-- p!4qTrrcA!t*s@- orir!!, t--
.tr, ,f.. -. " rrFr Fr'x t'Tx ' ttt tt|r rrrrl;t?;lrt VAITUATIONS ttti 'r*t*l!trt tttrr**********il t tll *
l; ^IHIHINSI h_ fls#tilr8it:l+4o3 s$Rtt F_tr',r',,it**r*rt**r**{r***rrr*t**l*ft-* CONfnACTtR INFOB}IAfION *******r*tf ******i**.*rt**
I:7Y9loral conf,r_ag,lgtt_Q,4V(ltt ,(n-,* =. Town of valt Reg. No,_t Addrgget faJ, tfuv z . ihonE lluntueir
t'
a; Eleotrlcal Contractorrr Addresg: fr-O- hy 8ti iiill; !t"!'p7+i'Ali'bi*W $f,[|"'fi*Xi* :"fu&&
{.n plumblng Contraohor! ,, . _. - rown of vstl Reg. No,_r Addreesi *-., ._ __ phone uunr[eir
h.
tMeotrantaaLContragtor:%TownofVallReg.N0._-*-i Addreser ffi Fhone Hurnberl
'1.I **********att*t***********tr**** F6R oFBIcE UsE *r*********ri**********ir***rl**i;! EUXLDINC PERUIT fEE; BUILDINO pr,iAN CIIECK FEE:
I PLUMBINc PERIIIT FEe: :- P}uMBiNO pLAN cHEcK FEEI't UECETNICAIT PbnHIT lEEt *,t4---- I'IECHANICAT, PLAN CHECK FEEI,. ELECTRICAIT fEEt lVY.fS+ .RECREAUoN FEEI' MECIIINICAL PEBHIT lEEr *,r4_--- l'IECHANtrCAr' PLAN CHECK FEEI. ELECTRICAIT fEEt llT.W .RECREAUoN FEEI'SlE$r[Y,taoE;,lEE*2:r.,.'4 g3f;1l-gl-flffiuffifti - W
fl l ifii-l eurr,orwc, .-dn//6/r{-L-it^-2-rl, l_l_t_l_f ErcNAru.hBt ___ 1 / -,I l-- l-.::l- i-' --l 3?EilXfi,i-E': comnents:,_
A{l-f{WU'l"nUf roHN os vArL coNsr4vcrroN pnnlrir I.:IA{
9t6t E z llvt ,.rs? t"*linlii-TqA?TN roRrt 8tr 7rtrtt4 9SB[ t c nvt '],ft , nerrrl-;*-9'
^l !flbtl1..#,rqi]ffi irr.,rro our col'rprrEr'r'v oR rr r,rAv No? BE AccEprED
f,*****'i*Id*fin**H***iiil*i***n*
pERMrr rNFoRl,{Aq'JoN ***r*r*r*******************r
'['l-Buf.tdtng t l-ptunblns g{rrectrro"t I l-U€ahanlcat I l-orher
$o$t$od
oo
****************************************************************
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO statemnt* * * * * * * * * * * lr * * * * * rr * * * * * * * !k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Statemnt Number: REC-0004 Amount: 147.00 0I/23/95 ILz32Permit No: 895-0010 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMITParcel No: 2101-064-07-010Site Address: 108 S FRONTAGE RD WEST. Location: EP FOR OFFICE REMODEL
Payment Method: Notation: TT ENTERED Init:
*******************************************L********************
Account Code Description paid
01 OOOO 41313 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 144.0001 OOOO 4T336 WILL CALL TNSPECTTON FEE 3.OOTotal (This Payment): I47.O0
Total Fees: l4'l .00Total A11 Payments: 147.00Balance: .00
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION
NOTE * COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE
DATEJANUARY 13. 1995
1 18?
department of community darelopment
TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY PRIOR TO ISSUANCEOF PERMIT
TYPE OF PERMIT
Ek autt-otttcI elecrRtcRlI |\4EQHANIIUd 5 I TACI
LEGAL
)e sc.
LOT BLK-
FILING V3I!-MIL-EAXK-EIDC
JoBNAME: VAIL BANK REMODEL
OWNER NAME VAIL BAN{
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
ARCHITECT FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
rrnu SHAEFFER C0NST
,o** o, uo,t
^rn. "o.
129-B
845-5656
lrr.r*,.o..
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
OTHER
CONTRACTOR
FIRM
TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO
TELE,
I
D
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP
tI t tvv
ABEHIRM
122a34DtvtstoN
GENERAL OESCRIPTION OF WORK :
-
REMODEI. TNTERTOR NT'T'TCF'. PARTTTTNNC
PERMIT NO.
z
tr
J
BUITDING 8000.00
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
MECHANICAL
TYPE GROUP G.R.F,A, VALUATION PERMIT FEES
II 1 fiR B-2 BUILDING PERMIT 125 . 00
ta
s
$$
PLAN CHECK 8l .00
ELECTRICAL
NEW ALTERATION OO{ AODITIONAL O REPAIR PLUMBING
DWELLING UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
-
HEIGHT IN FT,
-
NO. FIREPLACES
MECHANICAL
RECREATION FEE
INSULATION: I YPE THICKNESS R-VALLUE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FLOOR CLEAN.UP DEPOSIT r00.00
EXT. WALLS USE TAX
ROOF WILL CALL 3.00
TYPE ELEC.
OF
SOLAR
HEAT
GAS
wooo
TOTAL PERMIT FEES 309 .00
DAN STANEK I-I2-95
ADDITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED:
N INITIAL
sr cur I I I
UTLDING OFFICIAL DATE I
)NING ADMINISTRATOR DATE
BLASTING ONING & BUILDING NOTES:
I her€by acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required,
completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I
agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state
laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design
review approved, Uniform Building Code and other oldinances of the Town applicable thereto.
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT TO:
AND IHE OWNER.
HIMSELF
I
INSPECTION REQUEST ;i1 tg7
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
oor, 3' Ib' 75 JoB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
AM-@
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
E UNDERGROUND
E ROUGH / D.W,V.
tr ROUGH / WATERO FRAMING
N ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATTON'D POOL / H. TUB
tr SFIEETROCK NAIL tr
(r'"l' -tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
r] HEATING
tr FOUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr_
T] SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr-FTNAL tr FINAL
,tfbrffirro
ORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr RETNSPECTTON REQUTREq
4- t 4- 9 <DATE ' t'r /'t INSPECTOR
\ \tr -a.rt,, I
rNJPcroN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
INSPECTION:WEDREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
I] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
I] ROIJ'GH / D.W,V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
! rno"uuc tr ROUGH / WATER
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING trFAS PIPING -
,d poor- / H. TUBINSULATION
EETROCK NAIL u
trtr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMR POWER
MECHANICA[:
tr
|EATNG
. tr EXHAUSTtr ROUGH HOODS
tr CONDUIT E,SUPPLY AIR
u E
g/rrunr D FINAL
lTTNTZYr;IJ
RRECTIONS:
tr 9TSAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
t
at
PErNs CTION REQUEST"
TOWN OF VAIL?txq
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
r ll lr,,-
DATE :/ I LC I Ll ':) JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
479-2138
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W,V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION C] POOL / H. TUB
q SHEETROCK NA|L tr
s Frrual O FINAL
-ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANlCAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
q IryAL tr FINAL
'fhnoveo
ORRECTIONS:
C] DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
PEBMIT NUMBER OF P JECT
rNsilLroN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
479-2138
'e
DATE JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR FRI "
READY FOR
LOCATION:
CALLER
r!ES AM PM
BUILDING:
tr.FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr RoucH / D.w.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEr-
D ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION N POOL / H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL
D FINAL
MECHANICAL:
EMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
|Aeeeoveo $,)''tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR la
It rV ,;/ INSPECTION REQUEST/ TOWN OF VA|L/_
la
PERMIT NUM OF PBOJECT
,or, '2]
,"'j* i
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
FRI
JOB NAME
CALL
TUES WED
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDEBGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
O ROUGH / WATERg FRAMING
n ROOF &.SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr.INSULATION
tr SHEETFOCK
D POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
D
tr
tr
p rrrunl FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
O FINALrH4L
ED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
ONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
3-fu'q
PERIIIT /I
PERMIT APPLICATTON FORM
DATE:
APPLICATTON MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPI.ETELY OR IT I{AY NOT BE ACCEPTED
******************** ********* PER!1rT INFORI{ATTON *** *************!r ************
fl"#:,"1J::#,:s ;6,'1'eel
"Dofl
Wt")
Ph.
Ph.
[]-Bui1dingt]-P1u]nbing[]-E1ectrical[]-Mechanica1tx/-otherfu
Job Nane!b Address:
Legal Oescription: Lot Block_ Filinq suBDrvrsroN:
Owners Nane:
Architect, /U 4
Address:
Address:
ceneral Description:
I{ork Class: [ ]-l{ew f-aft"".tion [ ]-Additional
'/€f
[ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Nu:nber of Acconnodation Units z ,l/9
Address:
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
Plunbing Contractor:
Address:
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:
********************************
BUTLDTNG PERMIT rBE: -IV(T-PLI'MBING PERMIT FEE:
MECITANICAL FERMIT FEE:
E1ECTRICAII FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEEs
DRB FEE!
conments:
BUTLDING PI,AN CHECK FEE:
PLWBING PIAN CHECK FEE:
}IECIIA}IICEI, PI,AI{ CHECK FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
g-
-;ICLEAN-UP DEPOSfT:
Ut u-{ (l.,crt/ 3,u" TotAL pERt{rplFEES:
VALI'ATION BUILDING:
SIGNATURE:
ZONING:
STCNATURE:
Nunber of Dlrelling Units:. 4
r lPtrber and Tlpe of Fireplaces: Gas AppJ.iancesPd eas Logs A)O Woodr/pellet- ptv
||t********************************* VALUATIONS *** **** ****** ** **** ***** *** ******
BUILDTNG: $,aoo9 EI,ECTRICAL: S OTHER:
TOTAL:
*** ***** * * * ********** ******'.1contl.-jFor 1 f-.-f-ezef sa*rpf a< fi*q.Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Number: *+.<-d
Town of Vail Reg. No.
Phone Number:
Town of VaiL Reg. NO.
Phone Nunber:
Town of Vail Regr. NO.
Phone Nunber:
AOR OFFfCE USE ******** ************** ** *******
CI.EAT IIP I'EOSrf REFI'f,D IO3 Gt-f/*"oX
Plan Review Based on
the 1991 Uniform Codes
NAME: VAIL BANK OFFICE REM DATE: l-12-95
ADDRESS: 106 S. FRONTAGE CONTRACTOR: GEORGE SHAEFFER
VAIL, COLORADO ARCHITECT: NONE
OCCTJPANCY: B-2 ENGINEER: NONE
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 11-1HR PLANS EXAMINER: DAN STANEK
CoRRECTIONS REQUTRED
The items listed below are not intended to be a complete listing of all possibte code
requirements in the adopted codes. It is a guide to selected sections of the codes.
The following is not to be construed to be an approval of any violation of any of
the provisions of the adopted codes or any ordinance of the Town of Vait.
1. THIS PERMIT IS GOOD FOR AN INTERIOR REMODEL ONLY.
2. FIELD INSPECTTONS ARE REQUIRED TO CI{ECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.
3. A STRUCTUAL ENGINEER MAYBE REQUIRED TO APPROVE ANY STRUCTUAL
CI{ANGES BEFORE A FRAMING INSPECTION IS APPROVED BY TOV.
4. VENTTLATTON rS REQUTRED AS pER SEC 705 OF T[rE 1991 UBC.
5. ALL PENTETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED
WTTH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL.
Town of Vcii
0FFifril i -jfY
/"'A"z /-/z€{
luttn
75 roulh trontage roed
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138 ot 479-2L39 olllcc of communlty devolopmcnt
BUILDING PERTiIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAI.IE
If this peryit lequi.res a Town of Vai.l Fire Department Approval,Eng'ineer ''s (.publ ic works ) review ana approvail'i' ii'iruii n["b.p."t .ntreview or Hea'l th Departnrent_revi'ew, ani'a_review by the BuildingDepartment, the estirnated time for a total "eui"n-iluv"iulE'us t6ngas three weel(s .
f]] cgmmgrgial (Iarge or smat't) anO ajt mutti-family permits wi.llhave to foilow the above mentioned maximum requiremlnii, Res.ident.ialand.sma'l i projects,shourd tar(e a resser amount of time. However, ifresidenti'al or smalier projects impact the various above mentioneddepartments with reoard to necessary review,-il"i" i""j".ii'ruyalso take the three-week period.
Every attempt wl'll be nnde by this department to expedite thispermi't as soon as possrDte.
I, the
frame.,
undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time
lc /5,
ProjEET-Nanre
Corrnuni ty Devel opment Department.
u\s
:
=..?
F
e
E=""!n'
ffi)YFpi
il"rrl'S
$i:N
&s
.,j
at,-,
fll7
*$u
,[
+lrF
29,*68 i'
,l '\ r"?
{,*r"[.rji\;r)]
I.l-
--latr '
$
IU
ti ---\ rq
#ff-*"'t&r
EIFc,T-
F€I!CAfE
o
T;4ftI*
cro$ER
qrev)
trttt
\
\s
N$
\
\
.$
\
\
\
\
\
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 81557
970-479-2L38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMI]NITY DEVELOPMENT
*"J t
ALLNOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST
PROJECT TITLE:
NEW (SFR,P/S,DTJP)
BE POSTED ON ,JOBSITE AT
PERMIT PermiI #.tt.
TIMES
895 - 002 0
Job Address: 108 S FROI{TAGE RD WEST Status. .Locat,ion...: 106 S FROIiITAGE RD, VAIL, BApplied.
Parcel No. -: 2LOL-064-07-010 Issued..
Proj ect. No. : Erqrires .
Phone: 3038275656
Phone: 3038275656
co 80222
.: FINAL
. : 01,/1,L/1,995
. : 0L/1,2/L99s
. : 07 /1,L/L995
Units: 001
valuation
.00
.00
8, 000 . 00
8, 000 . 00
8, 000 . 000
APPLICAIiIT
CONTRACTOR
OUINER
Description:
Occupancy Type
Table DaLe: 04/0L/L992
Fireplace llrfo-Eation: Restricted:
SIIAEFFER CONSTRUETION
P O BOX 373, VArL CO 81658
SIIAEFFER CONSTRUCTION
P O BOX 373, VArL CO 81558
VIiTB BUILDING CORP t HANOVER REAI
coRP, 500 s cI{ERRy sT sTE 1115, DENVER
Number of DwellingFactsor Sq. Feet
Subt.oE.al:MulEiplier 1.00:
Addl Fixed Amountr:Total Valuatsion:
Town of vail Adjustsed Valuation:
*Of ea6 Applianccg:
ReBtsualeDts Plan Revi,an-- >
nDE Faa--------
Recreation fee- ------- -->
elean-Up Depoai!-------->
TOTAL FEES- - - -.
#Of eaa
',ogs:
+of liood/Pallet:
FEE SI'I'MARY *** !',*t lrtt** ** **
309-25
. oo
309-2s
309.2s
- oo
Building----->
Plan check- -- >
Inwestigation>
wilI call-- -- >
ToCal Calculaled FeeB--->
Addilional Fees--------->
Tolal PermiE Fee-------->
Palments-------
BAI.ANCE DUB.-. -
125.00
g1 .25
.00
3.00
.00
.00
.00
100 .00
309.25
II,EM: O51OO BUILDING DEPARTI'{BI{T
0a/12/L995 TRYNIS AcEion: APPR TT
IEEM; O54OO PLANNING DEPARTMEI T
O2/L4/L995 GARY Act,ion: APPR
ITCM: 05600 FIRE DEPART'IVIEIiIT
02/L4/L995 GARY Action: APPR
IECM: O55OO PI]BLIC WORKS
02/t4/L995 GARY Action: APPR
ITEM: 05550 ENGINEERING
BUILDING Division:
PI.ANNING Division:
FIRE Division:
PIJB WORK Division:
ENGINEER Division:
Dept:
APPROVED
Depts:
Dept:
Dept:
Dept:
* ** ******:r***1*** * *t*r** ****rrt** * * ** * * *** * * * ** * * *****t **** * * * ** **l, +r** * * *** *
See Page 2 of this Document for any conditions EhaE may apply to this permit -
DECLARATIONS
I here\F acknowledge tshaE I have r6ad thle appllcation, filled out in full thr lnf,gn0aLion required, conpleted an accurate ploc
p1an, arrd stabe tslrat all the infornation provided ae required i6 corlect. I rgr.c t,o conPly wi€h ehe information and plot plan,
to comPly with all Tolrn ordinanc€s ."o t tanr, and ro bulld chiB Etsrucrure ".."tdt" lhe Totrn'6 zoning and subdiwieion
codee, deeign reviel aFproved, uniform Buildj.ng cgds and otsher ordinanceg of lhe Town applicable tsh€r€to.
REQUBSTS FOR INSPECTIONS SIIALL BE MADE TWEMY- FOI'R HOURS IN AD\IANCE BY TEIJEPHONE Af 479'213g OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM E:OO AI'{ 5:OO PM
Send Clean-Up Depoeit To: SHAEFFER CONST SIO\N,TORE OF OVINER OR CONTR,AC'IOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWI{ER
PAGE 2********************************************************************************
COI{DITIONS OF APPROVALPermit #: 895-0020 as of OL/L3/99 Status: FINAL********************************************************************************
Permit Tlpe: NEW (SFR,p/S,Dup) PERMIT Applied: oL/1,1/L995Applicant: SIIAEFFER CONSTRUCrION Issued: o1,/L2/]-995
iIOb AddrCSS: 108 S FROI{TAGE RD WEST
LOCAIiON: 106 S FROIiITAGE RD, VAIL BANK BLDG
Parcel No : 2l-01--064-07-010
********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS********************************************************************************
Printed bv ,foan Nolen 9/99 0 6pn
E'rom: f-ynne Campbe].lTo: Judy Popeck
Suh)i ect: fwd: He110
- NoTE :t /25 / 99::5 : O3pm::
How do we refund clean up deposits on
lha ^l.l narmi lq? Dr-r wa irlsr- srn.l -\/er.t,r f .inance a check requ.esC? Wbat backup besides the permit do we use?
Thanks
Fwd =by 3 :Judy:Pope ck-::L / 2 6 / 9 9:l- o : 03am::
F\^/d to: L\,'nne Campbell
I serlt al-l tlrat 1nformation over to
Joan about one or one and a half weeks
aqo. I apo1oqizet I've been swamped
with priorj-ty stuff and tbten I was out
sick untiL now so I've got ].ots of
stuff to do stil1 before I can work on
and respond to Joan's question so long
ago. Paease be patient and I'la do it
as soon as I can. T HANKS MUCH!
Fwd:]ry::Lynne:campbe I:1, / 26 / 99:1O : OTam::
Fwd to: Judy Popeck
Thanks, I asked Joan if she had heard
from you and she said no.
Fwd:b\r::.fudt :Popeck:::a / 26 / 9 9:1O : l Oam:-
Fwd to: Joan Nolen, I-yrrrre Campbe]-l-
()ka\r, orl January 13th I asked for the
receipt nulnber, cLreck date, cfreck
amount. and check nurnber. .foan
responded \^rittrin a few minutes with the
information she did trave. This was in
:regafds to Permit #B95-oO2O. I have a
coplr of tLris correspondence if eittrer
of you need it. Thanks.
Page:
Printed by Llmne Campbell 6 /2e /99 10:21am
From : Judy PopeckTo: Joan NoLen, Lynne Campbel lSubject: Permit SB95-0020
===NOTE==== 6 /29 /99=IO:20am==Itrs been one week since my last E-nail
and I have not receiwed a response onthis permit. Lynne, you took care ofCity Market but I still need an answerfor Shaeffer Construction. r'll repeatwhat I did need in case neither of voukept a copy.
1) There definitely is no such beastas B95 - 0020. Community Development
sh'itched over to a different numbering
system at that time. The very first
new permit number I have is 895-0028.
There is, however, a Shaeffer
Construction permit #7187 durins that
same t.ime period and Chris and Ibelieve that it could be the same one.Permil #7187 was paid. The job
description on it was 105 S. FrontageRoad. Before a final decision is madeas to how to treat this one, pl-easeverify, if you can, whether or not thatis the same job site or not.
Both of you please reply so we can
complete the work on this permit.
Thanks much!
Page: 1
-,
o"!gn Review Action
, TOWN OF VAIL
rorl
Category Number /z oae /A /4 /4€
Prolect Name:
Building Name:
Proiest Description:
Owner. Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptionr Lot € Bbck 5
/ " , , -J
Subdivision ik,.-*-/ f/ ,' (-L.:r f-- /-Zone Dislrict tLI-
ProjecrstreetAdaress, 713 d-t )-dn,..--, ii-f .
,/
Board / Staff Action
Motionby: 8a.a-l.r - , Vote: ri-O
Seconded by: -.{! t"-,' I
(AnRrovat
3 Disapproval
fl StafiApproval
Conditions:
,,1 +'z al "
f ' '" ' r4
Town Planner
o"t", /Of sf< DRB Fee ere-vaia lO-@ r?.zJ
dt::
c-t3
a-
eta
"'#ar*'
r<' s" E
.r-
I
I
I
-t-
:..
::
...
::
:i h:: 'l
.'t N
;\
t,\k
,:. u,A
\p.:n:i p:iA
:'j R':: N
'n:r
I'i
':.: t-r!
.-.4i:l ,
:.c
i't
ii;'j
i:l
*:
.r
'.':
t'.;
i.i
.,:+ . r
;1:k .,
,i{
illi .' :
ii.t:'
:i!r .
ii'j( \
ii{ '
).!
.-Yi l. .T: ,
. GEORGE SHAEFFER
CONSTRUCTION COMPA
P.O. Box 373
vAtL, coLoRADo 81658
(303) 845.5656
ro €,-* - .-,-=r--*
LETTEfuF TRANSNflITTAL
oArE ?/z f/Zs- fiiE"srp- ,/rn
ATrENTtott
RE:
E Plans tr Samples
the following items:
tr Specifications
> WE ARE SENDING YOU tl Attached ! Under seParate cover via
D Shop drawings
fl Copy of letter
tr Prints
D Change order tr
coPrEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
./ ---t,1t E.q-z- jz2<c.t'
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
E For approval
E For your use
E As requested
tr Approved as submitted
E Approved as noted
D Returned for corrections
tr Resubmit-copies for approval
n Submit
-copies
for distribution
D Return-corrccted prints
E For review and comment tr
tr FOR BIDS DUE 19- tr PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
,O% Prs€onluncr Conn€ . 1096 Po6tOoiluner Cont€r SIGNED:
PBo[tf,Izo l@tnc,qtur k ol,u].,t encroct ra! aaa nol !6 notad, kilrdllt no,il! ia tl oaca.
i \ I Lumiire Design & Manutacturing, Inc.
\\ 11Sq0_V q Cotinas #101, Westiake Vrllage, CA 91362L.- TELEPHONE (B1s) 991.221 1 Ll FAX (s181 991-700s
rYPEI--__l
H'ghly v"rsarrle -O" rin0 Seated.nachrn?d minrature |ow voltage lan!966pg 3cc661tigtrr. UtiliZaJ.tzvoil. oouble contact (DC; bayoner base natogen tarnp
Murtr'use.rlghl soUr.e ' cer'verl,'g a cofittonaDre 3000 to 34og K?rv.n coror temgefaurg vanedrarnpavalabhly a(ows s901. rnedium. aod flood r|ghrng rnvanous wanaoes (r a.20. and35waG.)
Unobkusrve d?Sign. die torned and/Or rnaEimcd tor Crrtrcal lit and tuncdon ot all €mpgnenls. At3slclul ano qualry o/es?ntatoo rhal ders with tho envrronrpnt.
Eecause or ns inconsprcuous torrn thrs tixture is padial ra.ry s uilgd tor uprighr ng or trees s hruba. and
::::::1,.11-":_. oorrnhghr,ng tom rrees. bu,rdiog, garros. ano gardenireas Accrnrtigntrng ro(
Plants. ',vatkweys. vnder eav€S. SqnS erc
All pans Are lirst chromAle gonv8rston Coated a^d lhen ints,|gd w|th a Oah€d the.mooBslspolyesre/ powder tor me/ res*l"nc! ano sp€oric wcarherlbliq/ rn mairne (9a[ sp]ay]. rand"cap€taqlteus Chomicalr) and oth9. rornaity cotor inprious envircnmens Cqbrs - ArchrteCtslije'orue. &ack vcde. and whrte a'u sranaad orrry coro.s and pl"lod finr;h* avaitaue - ctnsun taaory.
Cambr;a ,?r I I /2' NPS swMei ngvnts ro mosi stardard outgog, J bores, ctsv"r paatgs. treernounB,0r gfound splgs (sas acc€Ssones) canonatzr2 ha3 a hanging,ing.nou*n t,nuo""lo sl3rlda4t cable or can hang trgrn liffe leads-
Ssbmlttll Apprord by: Name:
NoLa:
Cornpany;
Lumicre Design & Manu?acluring, Inc. reserves the r'gh1lo marc design changes wilhout notice, tor produci improvement
I I U)taZ t -=() |
^
\ \l Lumiere Desrgn & Manutacnrnng. trrc.
\\ 31 360 Via Colinas #101 , \rYesttake Viltage, CA 91362L- TELEPHONE (818) 9s1-2211 f F$( (818) 991_7005
rYPEI-l
f'. 5
1
lf{agittt, bard, ar|{' mouriino gxiwl arc dc ce{, tdnrd. .nd/o, r.tr*hinad m6t-Tg
lllTtjl; l1tq? n*{!!|q *trq
'.rsrs bradc ryls corlrp.c.s.oo d.dgn rs,ic'diy an€ alqryTplt"di-. !O' ring !.at ai lrrt. bld.nd batf tsdr.rrneuce farrrc Crr*iry enCndretr6iifmr-
f 2 v,ot stsnt l{ti.ing llFt I a phfl.rf r acb?, 35 war! lmerifium) haloofi tarrF - DC bGGs*r 'ith srrii-s rbar €rnrc!.nd 200 d.gr€e tEfor €€tad t - wtrlt, u.Lii"t"6 brrvcrbc.lirn. R'|tct Eansto|ttlcr ir rrqri[d. (tarq rnd mlsbrrrr not liddad,)
Hytfaulc arivC nEunt wlth t /lr NFS fhrd alon! unaysrlsl aiming ar!6 tesrgri|l' b dJrncrourol*|tictl ffiirlg!.
Ery-_Trt T1. !111!! st rpry rnrowc - qhce br'? - re thrlad r.ofq o€.cr ..s.'r,uy b*t
orno ftrn. t{o scREIrs oF 8ot_Ttt rolos€.
Ibs: F (ry, 4b (SBR. (}E (BGF|, yilou (SrF), Dinmd {DrR. Urt !r trrst (LSL),o'r.I SFd (OcLl. ild touw' (rvR)- uouwr$ 6twid SFr..s tOSe CSr. cdrzo, i*itdirtdch.,rtarJr,r€r'| stpb('|gtlrlftrfitrhrfinpntr$1, idra,totrnun6rq.Sro{l n ..a (a r-t} dltrrr $a5 (Fl(ltr).
R s Phitlr 'tttctof , D.C. Es . 35 Wd Ituintrrr (bt Cf.'.rD).
1
TAfiFIOW ECAiISPFAND FOflJTSEAilSPFErD IVIDE SETX SPREAD
lVilJ
ttnp
Cod.
sttfilS!.rd ht
CP
FIU
fbuft lvnrs
Lrnpce €a|B
Sqid
i,g
cp
Fru
lhnt lvrns
t ttp
Co.le
laant
A6rt'd
iaar
CP
a6d
LftrtItE7..sa00 emo ?o FSt '17.1tt00 m n FSv g 600 2000aF]SS r0.a000 s0 35 aAr af 2&m 3it AAY'94.1r0 2q00gta iKFx .tq (m0 so ai GT'Y 13 lso -m 90 6F :NF 350 3(xlonG3f6P7U$00 a0 GBA r8't.lO0 soo
?tiftF t?|log|.r.!hor 1.rry3 1
O
TOWN OFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
VaiI, Colorado 81657
97 0-479-2 I 3 8/479 -2 I 3 9
FAX970-479-24s2
october 10, 1995
D epartment of Community D evelopmen
fttt
coPr
Beth Golde
Weststar Bank
108 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: The changes to the previously plans for the WestStar ATM at the Gorsuch
Building.
Dear Beth:
As I am sure you are already aware, the DeSign Review Board consent approved yOur requeSt of
the changes O the previously approved planJfor the Automatic Teller Machine to be located in
the Gorsilch Buitdirig. The appidval grahted by the Design Review Board carried with it no
conditions ot approv-al. merbiore, yoi, are now able to pioceed forward with applying for and ,. .
receiving a Ouiiding permit for the cbnstuction of the Ritvt. Rn application for a building permit is
available from the Town of Vail Office of Community Development.
Again, the proposed changes to the ATM to be located at the Gorsuch Building has been
aipioieA dy tne Design Rlview Board. Should you have any questions or concerns with regard
td ine intorriration addressed in this letter, as always, please do not hesitate in giving me a call. I
can mosl easily be reached during regular office hours at (303) 479'2138'
Sincerely,
George Ruther
Town Planner
GR{r
{j *""nurru",
t DOign Review Action FCn
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
ProjeaName: r':{,1'
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone:
ArchitecvContact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot r"-- Block ".t Subdivision
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Staff Action )
Motion by:Vote:
! Approval
! Disapproval
\.f, Statf Approval
Seconded by:
Conditions:1-l ", .
,i
DRB Fee Pre-paid '1. .-- , a;
l';
tavl..a 7 /14/91
DESIGN RSVIEW
o
BOARD
APPLICAT 'S TT,AY
o
F VArIJAPPI.,ICATTON . TOWN O
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETTNG:
rrrrtlt******
*rt*t*****!tI.
{ A.DESCRIPTION:
ET TYPE OF REVIEW:
New ConstructionAddirion ($s0.00)
ADDRESS:
($200.00) * X lainor Arherarion ($20.00)
ConcepLual Review (90)
c.
D.IrO tLEGAL DESCRIPTTON:
Subdiwision Block
If property is described bydescription, please provideto Lhis application.
a meels and boundson a separate sheet
legal
and aLtach
E. ZONTNG:
F. l NAME OF APPLICANT:
Mai-1i Address:
G.
^APPLTCANT'S REPRESENTATTVE:NAME OF
Mailing Address:
l{. l
I
NAME OF OWNER(S)
ohrNER (S SIGNATURE:
Mailing Address:
APPIJTCATT0N9 wrLL Nor BE pRocEssED wrrilour otrrilER,s s.rcJvA?uRE
I. Condominium Approval if applicable.
,J. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,l are t.o be paid at therime of submirLal of .he DRB applib;iiorrl --lut.er, whenapplying fo1 a-building permic,-prLase iaencity the accuratevaluarion of Ehe proposal. The bown of vair wiri .al""l-crr"fee according to the table below, to ensure the correct feeis paid.
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION$ 0 $ i0.000$ 10, 001 - $ s0, 000$ 50, 001 - $ 150, 000
$150, 00L - $ 500, 000
$500, 00L - 91, 000, 000$ Over gL,000,000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPIRES ONE YF,AR AFTER FINALAPPROVAL IJNTJESS A BUTTJDING pERltrr rs rssUED AriID coNsrRucrroNIS STAR?ED.
FEE
i so. oo
$100.00
s200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
I
rr.
III
A pre-appl-ication meet.ing wit.h a member of the planningstaff is encouraged t,o deE,ermine if any addiLionatapplicaEion information is needed. It is the applicant,sresponsibiliey Eo make an appointment with the sLaff todetermine if hhere are addit.ional submittaL requiremenLs.Please not.e thab. a COMPLETE applicaLion will streamline thereview process for your project.
In addition to meet.ing'.submittal requiremenls, theapplicant must stake and t.ape Lhe projecE site toindicaEe property Iines, building lines and buildingcorners. All lrees to be removed must be taped. AllsiEe Lapings and staking must. be completed prior to Lhe
DRB sit.e visit. The applicant must ensure ChaL stakingdone during Lhe winter is noL buried by snow.
The review process for NEW BUfLDINGS normally requires
Ewo separate meetings of Lhe Design Review Board:-aconceptual review and a finat review.
Applicants who faiL Eo appear before the Design Revj.ewBoard on their scheduled meeLing dat.e and who have noLasked in advance that discussion on their item bepostponed, wi. lt have E,heir iEems removed from t.he DRBagenda until such time as t.he j.Eem has beenrepublished.
The followi-ng iLems may, aE Lhe discretion of thezoning adminisLraLor, be approved by the CommunityDevelopment Departmerit st.af f (i.e. a formal hearingbefore the DRB may not be required.) :
a. Windows, skylights and sirnilar exterioJ changeswhich do not. alLer the exiseing plane of Lhebuilding; and
b. Building addirions not. visible frorn any other lotor public space. AL the time such a proposal is' submitted., applicant.s musE. include letters fromadjacenL property owners and/or from the agent foror manager of any adjacent. condominium associationstating the association approves of E.he addition.
ff a property is locaLed in a mapped hazard area (i.e.
snow avalanche, rockfall, flood p1ain, debris fIow,wetland, eEc_), a hazard st.udy must be submitted andt.he o\nner musr sign an af f idavit recognizing the hazardreporL prior Lo Ehe issuance of a building permit.Applicants are encouraged t,o check with a-Town plannerprior [o DRB application to determine the relaLionshipof E,he property Lo aII mapped hazards.
For alI residential construction:
a. Clearly indicat.e on Lhe ftoor plans lhe insideface of Lhe exterior sLruct.ural walls of t,hebuilding; and
b, Indicate with a dashed line on che site Dlan afour foot distance from Lhe exLerior facl of Lhebuilding wal1s or supporting columns.
If DRB approves the application with condiE.ions ormodificaLions, aII conditions of approval must. beaddressed prior ro Lhe application- ior a buildingpermi L.
A.
R
D.
E.
F.
c
t
-LrsT or MATERIATS
NAME OF PRO.TECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTfON: LOT BLOCK
STREET ADDRESS:
SUBDTVISION
The following information is
Review Board before a final
A. BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffi ts
1 windows
I, Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
I{and or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
. Ret.aining Walls
Exterior Liqhtinq
OLher
reguired
approval
TYPE OF
for submiEtal
can be eiven:
MATERIAJJ
to the Design
COLOR
6@ ttt4&/, la.e rv/L.- z2aT
LANDSCAPfNG: Name of Designer:
phone:
B.
PL,ANT *t"*lr: Bor.anical Name cor*llqq*. ouanLirv si""*
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
*Indlcate caliper for deciduous trees.iduous SI nches. IndicaEet,rees. Minimum h**rndicate size of proposed5 oal.lon.
Minimum'caliper f or
hei.ght. for coniferousonifs6f
shrubs.Mininum size of shrubs is
Type Souare Footaqe
GROT'ND, COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF TRRIGATTON
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CO}ITROL
c- IANDSCAPE LTGHTTNG: rf ext.erior lighting is proposed, pleaseshow the number of fixtures and locations on a separat.elighting plan. rdenrify each fixLure from the ri;hting planil the space below and provide Lhe height above grade, type ofliqhr proposed, lumen out.puL, luminous area and a cut sheLt ofthe light. fixrure. (Secrion 19.54.050 J)
OTHER IJANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining vralls, fences, swimmingpools, etc.) please specify. rndiiate heights of retaininiwarrs. Maximum heighc of warrs within the front seEback ii3'. Maximum hei.ghL of walls elsewhere on Lhe proferuy i_s 6,
D.
't(w utlw e&oFotno Eaur
Nor- \lqq