The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDEV09-0008 PRJ09-0648�� `vd.4'.%1tiIT'f Le�"�EU' ei_`,, P�anning an�d En�rirc�n�rtent�l ��mr�i��n A�TI��1i �(��i�f ��pat�t��nt t�f Corr,snunity D��a�lap�ri��t 75 Sa�th Franta�� Ro�d, '�ail� �o[a��da 81657 ��[: 97Q.479.2139 f�x; 970.�479.2��2 vre�b. �gr�tw.a�ifgau.c�rr� Project Name: Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project Description: Participants: PEC Number: PEC090038 REDEVELOPMENT OF A PORTION OF TIMBER RIDGE APARTMENTS (EMPLOYEE HOUSING) OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/19/2009 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT VAIL TIMBER RIDGE LLC 11/19/2009 Phone: 214-349-7900 C/O LEE THOMAS 9639 GREENVILLE AVE DALLAS TX 75243 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: Kjesbo, Paladino, Pierce opposed Motion By: Kurz Second By: Cartin Vote: 4-3-0 Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 03/22/2010 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:300 (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: CON0012363 Any approvals granted by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) shall only be effective upon the approval date of each of the three development application requests. Should one or more of the development applications be denied or fail to be approved, then none of the applications are approved and the proposal is denied in its entirety. Cond: CON0012364 The Developer shall submit a revised set of drawings to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval depicting the rockfall mitigation fence along the south side of Lions Ridge Loop within the property boundaries of Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. The mitigation fence shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the regulations prescribed in Chapter 12-21, Hazard Regulations, of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. The revised set of drawings must fully comply with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012365 The Developer shall submit a detailed waste removal management and operations plan specifically describing how waste and recycling will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012366 The Developer shall submit an executed deed restriction for Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision, approved by the Town of Vail, demonstrating compliance with Chapter 12-6I, Housing District, and Chapter 12-13, Employee Housing, Zoning Regulations of the Town Vail, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. The deed restriction shall be noted on the Final Plat prior to recording the Final Plat with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office. The deed restriction shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy on Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. Cond: CON0012367 The Developer shall submit a revised architectural site plan and landscape plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval depicting a reconfigured fire lane/pedestrian path alignment which relocates trees from above the location of the water and sewer lines, narrows the width of the fire lane/pedestrian path to 14 feet maximum in the spaces between the fire staging areas, delineates the pedestrian portion of the path from the bicycle portion and provide physical improvements that discourages vehicles from entering onto the fire lane/pedestrian path. The revised plans shall fully comply with applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the application for a building permit. Cond: CON0012368 The Developer shall submit a construction staging plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval which addresses such matters as materials staging, construction parking plan, construction and occupancy phasing, temporary access, construction schedule, temporary utilities, traffic control, emergency access, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012369 The Developer shall record a revocable right of way permit for any and all private property improvements located with the Town of Vail right of way. Said permit shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012370 The Developer shall submit a Shoring and Excavation Plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, which addresses such matters as excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans, detailed profiles and cross-sections, existing utilities, materials storage, permanent and temporary easements, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012371 The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with the list of issues identified in the memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, dated March 16, 2010 and attached for reference (Attachment E). Said plans shall be submitted for review and approval and fully comply with all applicable regulations of the Town of Vail, pursuant to the date specified with the memorandum. Planner: George Ruther PEC Fee Paid: $0.00 u u 0 rMa-�,�;, : ��r2 Se�a�d� �r-� �, Uofe : �l— 3-D ( ��St� Pi�,�.,o ��e��.) , � . '� � � Department of Community Development,;' � �., �� _ ° '�� - 75 South Frvr�tage Road �`'.` ' ' K � : � �a �� , �� ;� Vail, Calor�da = 81657 �, � _� F � � � � , � � � ° � ��_- � ��Tel": 970�479-2128,_ �� ,�, :�� ° <'° � '�' � . � y � `; F�x: 970-479-2452 � § -,; � �� .., fi ,rc�;iNeb: www.vailgov.cc�r�: � � _ - D� � .�..�, . . , e�.,,_�� Development Plan Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commi i- ��''::: `.' 19 �009 4 ��C.)ilV�! �� `��'�,� i�� General Information: This application is required for the establishment or the amen roved devel ment plan. The establishment or an amendment of a development plan may be required for new construction, change in use or redevelopment on parcels that are within the following Zoning Districts or as determined by the Administrator: General Use (GU) District (Section 12-9C, Vail Town Code), Ski Base/ Recreation (SBR) District (Section 12-8D, Vail Town Code) and Ski Base/ Recreation 2(SBR2) District (Section 12-8E, Vail Town Code). Sections of the Vail Town Code may be found on the Town website at www.vailgov.com. The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Review Board and/or the Town Council. Fee: _$1500—Establishment of a development plan _$250—Amendment to an approved development plan � Description of the Request: K��'��'� �� '�� a;x�� ; h✓�� Ti �� I�� I�i cl�ic� �� ►��'� Physical Address: Parcel Number: _ Property Owner: Mailing Address: Owner's Signature: U��1 � � � o N. - i0��12i �� D� �iw�1�.� �i �� Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: ` Mailing Address: �� '�� e� ��I �/��,� l �a � I �, ��- Contact Eagle Co. ssessor at 970-328-8640 for arcel no.) ��i�/� �p. ��1 Ul.U1 ��V b�(�1�C�;� [1V► vG'1/� �/� �'% � �? �i "'r _ Phone: e� � � � � � �' � �` � 2 � � Phone: 1"C ''✓ � t � � � v G7 E-Mail: �� V l i ��,�'��% �'�i �� r��d'1 � Fax: �� . �� • � l ld For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: Received From: Meeting Date: � �i' � PEC No.: ��( _��i�l d�� Planner: � 1` Project No: i�'"1� �P � a Zoning: Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: �� Block:�� Subdivision: �.i�in Cf, �(04C� �� —O �� Ol-Sep-09 �� -. c� ��5r.1J`t{ �: r C�' . EC� �d?" `�-_ ... ��nnir�g ar�d Er�uironmen�a� ��►rnrnis�r�n �►+C�I��1 �� Depart�ent of Core�m�nat}� 1}�v�lop�ri�nt 7� Scr�tF� Fr��ntag� Raa�1, Vai[r Ct��or�do S1f�57 te(: 97�f.473.2139 faac: �7(1,479.2�5� v�eta: wrv�rw.vail�cav.c�srrt Project Name: Timber Ridge Redevelopment PEC Number: PEC100019 Project Description: REQUEST FOR AMENDEMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW FOR REVISIONS TO REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND GEOLOGIC HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF TIMBER RIDGE Participants: OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 04/01/2010 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT GEORGE RUTHER, VP, TRAHC 04/01/2010 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL CO 81657 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LiON'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: WITHDRWN Date of Approval: Cond: 8 (PIAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:300 (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Planner: George Ruther � PEC Fee Paid: $0.00 �� _ �:.�� 3 �r � �et� .. ��.+_�� t�nni�g and Er��rir�nmental ��mmi�s�an A��'I��i ��"3Ft�1 L�epa�t�tlent o� C��rams�nsty I;�ir�laprra�n� 75 S�uth F�antac�� toad, Vailr Cot�rado �1657 t�i: '�7€}.�79.�139 fax: 97�,474.2452 w�}�: �!ww.vaif�av.c�rn Project Name: Timber Ridge Redevelopment PEC Number: PEC100018 Project Description: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM VAIL TOWN CODE SECTION 14-5-1, MINIMUM STANDARDS, PARKING LOT/STRUCfURE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ALL USES TO ALLOW FOR A CROSSOVER AISLE WIDTH OF LESS THAN 30 FEET WITHIN REQUIRED PARKING STRUCTURE. THIS APPLICATION WAS Participants: OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 04/01/2010 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT GEORGE RUTHER, VP, TRAHC 04/O1/2010 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL CO 81657 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: Motion By: Second By: Vote: Cortditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: WITHDRWN Date of Approval: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond : 300 (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. .,� Planner: George Ruther PEC Fee Paid: $0.00 � ��II � �t�nr�ing anc� Er��riranr�ent�l �+�mr�� i+��'It��l FC��NI D�pa�-t��nt oi Corr�rrtunity �eryE�lcsprt'��r�t 75 South F�c�nta4� F�o�d, 'Ja[lr Cator�da 81657 tei: J7{�.473.2139! fax: �!7(i.�F79.��5� t��6: +��v$.vailg�u.cc�m Project Name: Timber Ridge Redevelopment PEC Number: PEC100001 Project Description: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 14-6-7: RETAINING WALLS, TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINTING WALL IN EXCESS OF SIX FEET IN HEIGHT Participants: OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 01/12/2010 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT PYLMAN & ASSOCIATES 01/12/2010 RICK PYLMAN 137 MAIN ST, SUITE 170 EDWARDS CO 81632 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-iZ1-0500-8 Comments: See conditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Kurz Action: APPROVED Second By: Viele Vote: 6-1-0 (Kjesbo opposed) Date of Approval: 03/22/2010 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): f�a changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:300 (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: CON0012372 Any approvals granted by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) shall only be effective upon the approval date of each of the three development application requests. Should one or more of the development applications be denied or fail to be approved, then none of the applications are approved and the proposal is denied in its entirety. Cond: CON0012373 memorandum. Planner: George Ruther PEC Fee Paid: $0.00 . ,-, ❑ � .� .:�� :� �z� - � <��, &g , ; ;�'� �� .'R ,:n .�... ' ° f8 � ,�✓� � , �: t � � -� � ,� � . :.� � � . � ,� , ..�.�;i: . "��:t . Department of.Communi#y Q�velopment"e�' 75 South Frontage Ro�d #, Va�l, Ca.lorac�o d 8�657 �s `� r�.� -w � `'��TeI �.97� 479 2'! �8 :�` � � �`�� F�i��9TD=4T9 245� °' :� ~;� � � . � � ,°, �� ,��;P_ � , �-�� ilVeb: tivrriw �atlgov com� . Development ��vie� Coordfn,�tor,; �-� . .��. '� : � �-� ��; � �� °--��-�.� . _ . °�� ,... �. , x��.�_. .,�� .,� w � ;;� Variance Request �� ,� 2�� lication for Review by the Pianni r and Environr�ental Commission Gene .F �� be granted in order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and un- necessary physical hardships as would result from the strict interpretation and/or enforcement of the zoning regulations inconsistent with the development objectives of the Town of Vail. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or con- ditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. The Vail Town Code can be found on the Town's website at www.vailgov.com The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Re- view Board and/or Town Council. Fee: $500 Description of the Request: �� %��'�� '�� v��1.�1� �� cZ � l � W u 1� Gi 1%�� vl i VLG7 �r'�f�. �,-� �— . , �n l i� ��<c� �� i x � �i �� " i � � U � �� n�- — Physical Address: �� '" ►'Y ��T�-�i� � v��'��. �� I�� Parcel Number: Property Owner: Mailing Address: '�.j j; Zj. � y� �� j> V U� (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) ivV►�Gii `Q'��'�.G (�i � '�G'��c'�IC �rityil � L�r �iv��;T��1 ' � j�vvv�, l �i� 1 (iU � I � �i�- �'Li 1 �1 � � , Phone: � ' � �� ` �� s Owner's Signature: P� a Contact/ Owner Representative: P� �� P�i �+nn.�- in ' P� 1 w+.c. �, � P��. nm ry , , Mailing Address: ! � ��°�'� � ��'` � � � �� '� � � �,��v�l�'��9 �� ' ��i�i� Phone• G��"1/ �`� 2'Ir (�C�'�%� E-MaiL• �� iMLtV1 L(-�OW1 C.a.�at: �L"�" Fax: ► For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: 4..1W�vi 'D Received From: Meeting Date: ZI SI 1O PEC No.: � ��e�0 �� Planner: l��'1 1� Project No: r4�3�� • Q� Zoning: �l,.� � Land use: r.��i�cs-�.T►tAL— Location of the Proposal: Lot: ^ S Block: Subdivision: Lio�-15'Rt�i^� . O1-Jan-1U � �� l��i�gr� R�v��ur �c�ar�d �►��It�� Ft�R� ��p�artment c�f co�ram�tnit� ��r��c�prrT�nt 7� S��th Fron:iac�� Fta�d, Vail� �a�n��ad�r $16�7 te�: 9�t�,�13�.213� fax: +�70.�79.z45� vreta: w�,r�!.�ailgcav.c�r�t Project Name: Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project Description: Participants: NEW EMPLOYEE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT DRB Number: DR6100079 OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 03/25/2010 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT VAIL TIMBER RIDGE LLC 03/25/2010 Phone: 214-349-7900 C/0 LEE THOMAS 9639 GREENVILLE AVE DALLAS TX 75243 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: See conditions Motion By: Gillette Second By: Plante Vote: 3-0-0 Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 08/04/2010 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond:201 (PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3: APPEALS. Cond:202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0011763 �� `� ��, �, �� ` �, � I�� i�'� '�� : 1�. . a?k � ,.:� & � (,f � �� p . � � � � � 0�� .:, � � � ., � Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorac�c� $'1657 ' � � §�� . °�•�Tel: . 97Q»479��'��8 `': < Fax: 970-479-24��. ;; '': „Web. www:vailgav c� � _ _ . .,. , .. _. _ _.. � .a Application for Design Review New Construction General Information: This application is for new construction of a residential or commercial structure. Applicable Vail Town Code sections can be found at v�awv�.�r�il�.cxrr.�c�� under Vail Information - Town Code Online. All projects re- quiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, as outlined in the submittal requirements. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Plan- ning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction commences. Fee: $650 Single Family Duplex � Multi-Family Commercial Description of the Request: Redevelopment of a portion of the existing Timber Ridge Apartments with a new employee housing development Physical Address: 1280 North Frontage Road, Vail, CO Parcel Number: 210312105008 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation Mailing Address: 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 Phone: Owner's Signature: / J . 0 Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC, c/o Lee Thomas Mailing Address: 9639 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75243 Phone: 214-349-7900 E-Mail: Ithomas@cfjordan.com Fax: 214-349-7910 For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: �i4r+V�r..� Received From: � V�� I IH�� t�� lL Meeting Date: �"1 DRB No.: �Q..� ID�O"lq Planner: �..-i�. Project No: �V.�l7G - OIA�IFf I J��(7Ct - bl�.�' Zoning: � 1-�� Land Use: I�c�1rJE,�-LT1 ✓t�-- Location of the Proposal: Lot: �-5 Block:_� Subdivision: �,i � `c.t �oL -�i I�nv 1. Ol-Jan-10 i��i�gn �t��r�+��v �3�ar�d ,�,�TIt�� F�R�I �`'^�.��` ��p�rt��nt �f C�rr�rr�un�t}� [}��r�laprra�r�t ��,� �� 75 SQUth Fronta,g� Raa�i, liail� �c�torado �1657 �� te�: 97�.47�.2139 fax. �7�.�79.Z�5� s�:�'.1'.tJ�i'vC?-`v£L�:•��,i=x,° YJ��}: W�I+!W.4'�[�Cj[)Y.C�1(31 Project Name: Timber Ridge Redevelopment DRB Number: DRB090593 Project Description: REDEVELOPMENT OF A PORTION OF TIMBER RIDGE APARTMENTS (EMPLOYEE HOUSING) Participants: OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/19/2009 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT VAIL TIMBER RIDGE LLC 11/19/2009 Phone: 214-349-7900 C/0 LEE THOMAS 9639 GREENVILLE AVE DALLAS TX 75243 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-1Z1-0500-8 Comments: Conceptual review BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: CONCEPT Conditions: Cond: 200 (PLAN): A conceptual review is NOT a Design Review Board approval. Plarmer: George Ruther �J I 3�� , .. r� Department,of:Community Development-` �' � k ,� ° �, ' ; ' � ; South Frontage Road �.y � � � � 75 . � � ,,,� �'-, �j � . _. . ��. �� , , � �� Va�l, C�lorado=.81657 �� m � �� , > �� TeL ,� 970 479-�1�$ �. ',� `� � � ��.. � . �' � , � , ` � F��C 970-479 2�52 �� ; , x v .� � F �� z ��.� e�rvw � .. . �� Web; vwita�r v��igo�cp�tn � �� , � �� ' � �� De'velap�nent E�evie�v �taard�n�tai' e F lz rc.� � t & i. �'�,` < b i i jj �iy (qy, � j('�i � g�yjg�jjj �� Y;.�F �y � �g, ..3� . �: E�i��j"¢l�fl� � �1 ��'!3 �� ;� ��:�� a � . .d,�^`� .. . ro�%.n w z,..� . J.'��.,+.ari,.mi � . ,__" ._ N._..�.?.�_ $S._ >_ ,... �.. � �„ ,�.,..... ��tr a,Ke�, �_w . Application for Design Review � L� �'' � l Conceptual Review �;�,�� , � �� i f t' A conce tual review may be requested by an applicant w new construction or ma General In orma ion. p changes are to occur on a property. A conceptual review does not serve as a final ap rovalT��`, tion is required for final review. The conceptual review is intended to allow the applicant to introduce Design Review Board and receive comments. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews. Fee: $0 Single Family Description of the Request: _ Q�C 1 C�1 `�IG� � i vvl � P,�nn 1�1 � i n� (�, �n a i11��1 i � i�� h Physical Address: V ��a�cel Number: Property Owner: �I Mailing Address: Owner's Signature: Duplex '� l � J Multi-Family Contact Eagle Co. Commercial � or at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) �1 V1 C1 � � �� l�Vl �� c�� I . ��M I , L� ��l ��`�- Phone: � � " " 1 �� `�? � Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: M�ilinn A�i�irPCC• - 1 lf/ ��1 1� L/( .l i V 1 v� � �J �. �7 r Phone: 2-� �� 7 � � � �C� E-Mail: �/��/ �,H� �� V �C�� Fax: � � � � �� d Cti� For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: Waived Received From: Meeting Date: DRB No.: ��__��?J Planner: ____�✓�� Project No: �a�J�� — �� Zoning: Land Use: �ocation of the Proposal: Lot: �� Block:�� Subdivision:��t('��i � � C�k r _ � ��IOa-4 OG 09/O1/09 � � , .. PRE-DF.�'FLOYiV1ENT AGREENIENT "T`HIS PRE-DEVELC)PM�NT AGREEMENT ("Agreeinei�t") is made this __��'` day of �}��,,,�,,,�� , 2049 (the "Effective Date"), by and betti��ecn the 'Town of Vai�l, Golorada, a Calorado home rule municipality, (thc "Town"}, Timber �idge Affordable Nousing Corporation, a Colorado non-profit corporation (thc "Gorporatian") and Vail °I'imber ilid�e LLC, a Nevada liniited liability corporation ("Develop�x"}, (individu�lly a"Party" ai�d callectively t}le "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Corporation is tlae owner of certain rehl praperty, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and ince�rporated llerein by t11is referenc,e (the "I'roperty"}; �HEREAS, on December 18, 2408, the To��z� issued a request fvr propo��ls ("RFP") seeking qualified individuals or organizations ta develap the Property I'c�r emplcryee housing; WHEIZEAS, D�veloper submitted a res�onse io ihe RFP, and the Tow�n selected Develaper's response ta the RFP as the best option for development of the Property for eniployee hc�using; WHERE�S, to accomplish the development of the Property for employee housing, the Corpc�ratican ��ould retain fee o��jnership �f'the Property, but «rauld pra�jide Developer with a long- term ground lease of the Property; and WHT:REAS, the Parties wish to establish terms af tihe �re-development process ancd paralneters �f the everilual develc�pment af'th� I'r�perty tar enlployee hc�using. I`10W, THFREFORF, for and in consideration of the mutual prc�mises and covenants cont��ined herein, the sufficiency of ��hich is muit�ially acknati�rledgeci, the }�arties tzereto agree as f«lla«�s: 1. rxclusive Optian tc� Develot�. During the terni of this A�:reement and subject to all ol� its tcrms, Develc�per shall have the exclusive aption to c�evelop the Prc�periy far emplc�yee housing. 2. Parameters of L7evelopment. The eventual development of the Property tar emptov�e housing ("Development"} shall be subject to the execution of a mutually acceptable developrnent improvement agreement ("DIA"). The Development shall meet the fotlo��ing parametcrs, which n1a}� be fiirther detailed in the DIA: a. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this 1lgreetnent and the DI�, the IJevelopment shall at all times be subject 1c� the Vail "1'oti�vn Cade. b. The Town shall provide the Developer with a long-ter�n ground lease of ihe Property, with an initial term of si�:ty (b0) years, �Slus three (3} options t� rene�v for a period af ten (1 Q) years each, for nc� additional c<�m�ensation, with each renewal apt�ion contin�ent �ipon the conditicm that all impro��ernents an the Site �xre in gaUd conc�ition and the buildings on the Site arc habitable ("Ground Lease"). All rentals due under the Graund Lease �will be reflected by a one-rime up-fron�t pa}°ment of �leve�n nullic�n dol lars ($11,t�U0,000) du� at the Groiind Leas� Clc�sin�. All improvernei7ts constructed on th� 4'rt��ertv sh��ll be owtled by Developer; pravided chat, to the extent necessary for taa purp�ases and mutually a�reed by the :'* �T� K��'I�9l��`��II'I Illl l!2(�1J9 f':'�L)OC'MIi�1l�YfMIRfil1,C3C`ALS—I fTEA4YL�PGRFid'/SB�T/M13ER RIC>GE PR�-DIA 6.UC7C Parties, Developer may grant to the: Tawn or its housing authority� a ane-percent (1 %) interest in sueh ir��provements. c. Developer shall conduct at least one pre-application confercnce v��it}a the "I�own Council, the Developmcnt Revie�� [ic��rd ("QRB") and t}ie Planning annd Environmental Commission ("PEC") prior ta subir�itting its initial �pplication for the Ueveloptnent. Such pre-a�plication conf:erence is an opportunity fc�r De��eloper to I�ear comments fram the Tativn Cauncil, the DRB and the PF.;C cat�cerning the Dev�loprnent, but the '1'own shall not bc bound by any such cotnments, and any reliance on such cam�nents shall be at Developer's otim risk. d. Developer shall subrnit to the Tcawn the initial application for the Development on or before April 1, ?010. T�he application rziust he signed by the Town and the Gorporation, because the Corporation will remain the f�e c�wr��r of the Froperty and t�he 'I'own and the Corporation must consent to the De4�elapment applicatic�n. f111 applications for the Praperty sI1a11 be pracessed in accardance with the Vail Town Code. eO. T"he I3evelopment shall include three hundrecl #ifty-nine (359) Ernployee Iiousing tlr�its capable of hc�using tive hundred seventy (570} beds far emplayees, as the term "�m�loyee" is defined in Section 12-2-2 of the Vail Tow=n C�de. It is acknowledged by the Parties that I)eveloper has relied on this numbr,r of Empic�yee Hausing Units and beds in caiculating its tinancing for t�ie Devel�pment, and there�fore, the n�.�mber of Empioyee Hc�using Units and beds shall not be increased or reduced by I�e��eloper �r the "l�awn C.ouncil at any time, e�cept by mutual w�'itten agreement of Developer and the "I'a��m. �f. Parking f�r the De��elaprnent shall be determined �ursua»�t t� tl�e Vail 't`c�wn Cc7de. g. At no tizne shall the Development eliminate acc�ss ta ar t1�c ability to sately occupy ar aperate the Timber Ridge housing units currently existin� on the real pro�rerty adjacent to the Property, as more particularly described on Exhibit B, attached hereto and ineor��rated herein by this reference (the "Adjacent Property">. h. The Towt� shall refund all amaunts paid by Developer for the Tc>�vn's cons�truction and buildin� materials use tax applicable ta the Property within ten (1(}) days �f the T�wn's receipt thereof. i. The To��n agrees to waive all demolition and building perniit fees for pertnits issued by the Tawn in connection with the Development. j. The Town sl7all iinpose typical and customary plan revi�;w ie�s for revietiv �f all plans for the Property, and Devcloper shall be responsible for payment of such fees as required by "I�own regulatians. k. The Town shall use its best effarts to help De��cloper obtain an exetnption from pr��erty taxes far the Development fiam all taxing authorities. Ta the e�tent the ! 1 �! 1 �'f70y (:`.II)OC'l,r,i1F.--1 �A4.�/17F,;l,OCAlS�-1?TF,4fY?h7'Gf�'/'ti7S'E'-77,NB6R RIDGE 1'RF.'-1�1�1 6.UUC' �' � Praperty is not tax-exempt, the 1'own shall refutld aily pr��erty taxes, net of the F.agle County 'I'reasurer's fee, collected b� the To�r�n on tl�e Praperty vr improvements tllereon. l. If Developer wishes to use federal funds for the Uevelopcnent, it shall be Developer's sole responsibility to prc�cure such funds. m. Dcveloper sitall be responsible for canstruction �f anv public improvements necessary for the Develapmet�i, including streets, side�.�alks and utilities (including relocating itle �as line currently located in the Front��e Road); �ro�rided, however, ttie Tati�n shall reitnburse Developer for the costs of the improvements to the I�rontage Road required for the Developmeczt, incluc�ing a deceleration lane. The timing of sucll reim�ursement shall be addressed in the DIA. 3. Ground Lease C:losin�. The Gr�aund Lease Glc�sing shall accur ��ithin thirty (30) days of final a�proval of all of Developer's applications for the I)evel�pnlent and satisfaction �f all canditions for Deve;lopment financitig. If the "1'awn ar the C.orporatian fails to execute the Ground I.,ease at the CUround LeGise Closirlg, the Deti-elcrper shall be entitled ta thc remedies specified in Section 6 hereof. At the Ground Lease Closit�g, t}le "1'own, the Corporation �.nd the I)eveloper shall execute a deed restrictian stating th��t (ij the I'roperty shall include three hundred fifty-nine (359) Emplayee 1Iousing I1nit5 capablc af h�using tive hundred seventy (S70) employee beds in per��etuity, unless tlle number of beds or �:mployee Housing Units is m�ditied by muival agreement of Ch� parties pursuailt to Section 2.e. hereof; and (ii) such beds may be leased to non-eznployees in the event nat leased hy employees, pursuant ta the terms of the Ground Lease. 4. Town and Corporation (�bli at� ions. a. During the tenn of�this Agr�;ement, the "I'awn and the Corporation shall work with Developer and the Calorado I�epartment of "I'ranspartation ("CL)OT") tcr resolve road��ay issues related to the Dcvclapxnent. b. The To��n and the Corp�ration w�ill cause an updated tiC1e cammitment for the �'roperty and the Adjacent Property to be deliverec� to Develaper ��ithin thirty (30) day5 ofthe date of this Agreement. 'I'he Town and the Gotporation shall a�nend the deed restriction currently existing un the Pra�crty tc� allo�v lor the Development, and the Town shall issue a corrective decd to the Coz�oration rernoving the res�rietive covenants existing on the Property. c. Thc Tawn and thc Corporation shal l graizt tc� Developer, for the benefit �f the Property, easements acrr�ss the Adjacent Pro�erty that are �nutually determined to be necessary fpr the Development; including ��vithUUt limitation, utility, drainage, and access easements; provided, hc�we�rcr, na such easements will IZa��e a�naterial adverse effect an the c�peration of�the Adjacent Property. d. Except as otherwise pravided in this �lgre�ment, the Town and the Corporation sl�all cause any existing liens and cncumbrances an the Propert}� to be released in order to facilitate Develc�per's financing. 3 t i� r t�zo��v C.': iDC)C.'Lt,i1E-lLi9tG//REtLpC;9LS--lI7'6r�fPL�f (iRf"i►'ISF,'4TIri98�R RIC>GEPRE-DIfI b.DOC � .. e. "I'he Tow�n and the Corporatian shall o�tain the release of any ��aster lease c�n the Property atld deliver the 1'roperty free of any leases or par�ies in possession on the date c,f the Ground Lease Closin�. t.. �I fle I U��'i1, Corporation and I�evelaper will negatiate and execute a co►�Imercially reasanable fc�rm of Graund Le��e which will reflect necessar�� provisians i��r l?evelvper's tinancing. g. "T'he "I'ati��n and the Corporation shall cc�ntribute to Developer for purpases of th� I7e��lopment any tap fae credits att.ribtiteci t� che Property as of the Effective I)ate of this Agreement. h. Within thirty (30) days af the Effective Date, the Tawn s11a11 cnrnznission a study to determin� the tatal cost of the rock fall mitigation r►cccssary far the I)evelc�pment, as�cl De��cloper shall reimburse the To�vn for fiftv percent (50°la) af the cc�st of such study �uithin ten (10) days oireceipt of an invoice fi•om the To��n. The details regardii�g pa5�nent for rock fall mitigation costs shall bc� set fort�h in the DIA. i. "I'he 'I"o��rn shall waive traftic impact fees associated ��itl� tl�e Development. j. If necessary, the Towt1 shall 5ubcardinate its existing indebtednes� an the I'rc��aerty ro tlie Grotmd L,ease and cc�nstructic�r� fiilat�cing �tot• ttae F�eveloprnent. g� k. Th�; Tc�wn and Che Corpe�ratian shall negotiG�te in gaod failh with Developer for an exclusive o�tion to develop the Adjacent Praperty on terrns similar tc� the f nal � strt�icture af this l)evelopmei�t, tc� be more partici�ilarly set forth in a ec�mrnercially reasonable form c�f c�ptic�n agreement. The term of Siich option shall be tive {S) years fr�m the issuance of'the first certificate oI`occupancy for the Development. � l. Thc Tawn shall not amend applicable development �tanc�nrds, 5ubdivision regulations ar zoning rcgtilations in any manner that has a mat<,rial adverse effect an the secrpe or parameters ol the Develapment. 5, Due Dili�ncc. During thc term of this Agrcement, Develc�per shall eonduet all due dili�ence necessary° to ��etermine wl�ethcr the Property is suitable for 1he Develc�pment, at Developer's sale cost. 6. "I�erm "1'ertninativrl and tireac}�. a. `I�his A�recrnent sl�all commence upon thc Etfective Date and teiminate two (2) ycars thereafter, pro��ided that either Party may terminate this Agreement caa�lier than such daie u�ac�n thirty (3�) daVS w�-itten n��tice to the tatller Parties. b. In the event of a breach by a Party ta this A�r�ement, thc, nc�n-breachinb Party ��vill prc�vide written notie� c�f each breaeh to the breaching Party, and th� breaehing Party will have a perioc� caf thirty (3Q) days frc�m reccipt of such natice in which to cure such breaeh, �rovided that if such breach r��c�uld re3sonably be cYpected to take long�r than thirty ( i0) t 1�'11'2(t09 (,': ID(')C(iA1.f.-1 iMA�lttF.'iGOt'A1.S-1 �TF �i�Pt,tE'GRY6i LYF`;T1dfBER RIL>GE P'R�'-1�IA d.f.�CJC rr days io cure, the breachin� party may have an additie�nal perioc� to cure as rna}r be re��sonalaly necessary, provided such cure is promptly commenced and diligently prosecuted to completion. � J c. ln the event of an unetzred t�reach by I�evelc�per and a tcrmizlation of this AgrEement by the '�I'ou��n or the Corporatioiz as a result of such br�ach, �Lievela��er shall lose the c�ption s�t fc�rth in Sectio►i 1 hereof, and the To�vn and the Gorporation shall hati�e na further c�bligatian tc� De��eloper. d. In tlie event c�f� a terminaiion of this A�recment d�ie ta any at the follawing four �vents: (i) an uncured breach by the 'I'own or the C�rp�ratic�n; {ii) a termin�tio�ll�y the Town or the Gor�or�ation �vitllout cause; (iii} the inability af the '�I'o��n to close on the Ground Lease; or (iv) a unilateral e}aange by the T�wn in the nun��ber c�f E�nploye� I-�ousii�� Units ox beds that is not agreed ta by Developer; the T'awn sha11 reimburse C7evelaper for its actual out-of-pocket eYpenses incurred far third-party consultants for arcllitectural and engineering services in conneetion with the Development, incurred from the E�Ffectiwe Date through the date of terminatian, uncured breach or the Ground Lease Cic�sing, whichever occurs tirst, up t� a ma�imum amc�unt c�f ane millic�n dollars {$1,000,000), subject tcs the s�ibmission to the Town of actut�l invc�ices provin�; sueh costs. Sueh out-af=pocket costs shall not include any fees for legal servic�es or salaries far any employees of I)evelUper. 7. Costs. Except as othe�•�vise seC farth herein, �ach Party :>hal( be res�onsible fa�r its own costs under tl�is �gr�;ern�nt. 8. Modification. This Agreement may only be modified l�}r subsequent written agreetnent of the Parties. 9. Integrati�n. This Agreement ru�d any at�tached e�hibits constitute the �ntir� Agreetnent between Dc��elaper and the Ta��m, superseding all prior oral or ��ritten con�muz�icatic�ns. l0. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall he hinding upon and inure to the benefit of�the parties hereto and thc:ir re,spective heirs, suceessors azad assigns. 11. Severabil�ity. If any provision of this Agre:ement is de:terrrained to be void by a eour� of competent jucisdic,tion, such determination shall t�ot affect any other provisi�ra l�ereof, v�d all �f the oCher provisions shall remain in full force and effect. If any prc�vision of this Agreement is capat�le af two canstructions, ane c�r which would render th�: pravisic�n vaid, and the other �uhieh �vould render the provision valid, then the provision shall have thc rneaning which r�nders it valid. 12. Governing„Law= azZC� Vcnue. This Agreement shall be �;overneci by� the laws of the State of Golorado, and �ny legal aetion concerning thc provisioi�s her��f sh�ll t�e brought in Eagle Caunty�, Colorada. 13. Assignment. There shall be no transicr or assignment of any vf the rights or cat�li�,ations c�f I?eveloper under this Agreement without the pri��r ��ritten apprc��al of the "I'own. i t>> rnnov <":'�llf)CtiMF.-llh1,�IR�iLt7C',-iLS�I'�TE4f/'bt7'GI2F11�ISGI'1'IMBF.f� KIIIGE PRE-D1.A 6.�OC � 14. Rccordation. This Agreement shall be recc�rded in the real estate recards of Eagle County and shall be a covenant running ��itl-► ihe Yrc�perty. 15. 1�itle anc� Authc�ritv. D� veloper expressly ��arran�ts and r�presents to the Town ttaat the und�rsi�ned individuals havc full po��r and authorit�� to ei�ter into this Agreernei�t. D�vel��aer and the undersi�ned individuals understancl that the "�I'c�wn is relying c�n suct� rcpresentatic�n ai�d warranty in entering into this Agreement. 16. �I"hird P�rties. 'T'her� are no intended third-p�rty �ieneficiaries to this Agr�ement. l 7. C`��ntiri�encv� Na DebC. Pursuant to �rticle X, � 20 c�i��ilse Cc�loradc� Cc�nstitution, any tin�i7ci�1 obli�atians af the Town und�r this A�„reernent are speci�tically c��ntingept upon annual ap}�rc�p�-iation of funds suf�icient to p�rforn� sueh obligatic�ns. This A�reeit�ent shall never constitute �� deht or obli�atio3l of the "I�o��n witkiin any st.atutory ar e�t�nstitutiUi�al prc�visi{�n. 18, No .Ic�int Venture. Nc�twith5tandin� atly provision her�of, the To��n shall never be a joint ��enture in any private e�Itity or �etivity ti��hich participates in this Agrcement, and the �1'o��n shall ne�rer be liable or responsible for any debt or obligation of any pG3rticipant in this Agreement. Vv`H1�:REF'(�RE, the parties heret« l�ave execuTed this Agreement on the day and year f�irst a�ovc ��ritten. AT°TES : f rr tf �: L k'�`4�.-' ��``` �. L r ei onaldson, Tc7wn Clc:rk APPRnVrn A O l� RM: � ,r �`� ��, � ._..�._�_._._.__.._...__..___.. ..._ Ma�i Mire, "I�o�r�n fltt�rney TO tJI' VAIL, C-OI,ORADC) / _ GII� Jf.---..-----''�_ 1j St� I.em(er, �("owrn l�'(anaber �.,�%�;.aF,c�� •' •. .� : ��A� : . [L. +/'i �f*M� �i�'�•wl l � rr rt�?��v C: IC1<�CCJMF_� / Al:l�l/f{6'IGC�t`ALJ—ii7'EA4P'tPEiRP43lSF=77:t�BLfR RL1�GF, t'RE-1�l.A b UOC" �; ':� �� STATI: OI' CC7I.C?RADO COt.?NTY (�F �' c�...' � } } ss. ) TIIVIBER RIT)C'rF AI'FC?RD11�3LE H(7USINCi CORI'Q `I�ItaN �y: 1 � �--- Name: �5 % Le�.�. Its: c r�- The foregoing inst�rument vvas su�bscril�ed, swc�rn tt>, arad ackncn��lec�ged before me this 1�� day of �„}ev�k�-e.r'" , 2009, by ��'�� G e.�2p�'"` _._. as the ��, �,; ��r,�,.,,--{- af Timber Ridge Aftorc�abic Hc�usit�g C'c�rpor�tion. � ,f��:�� My c�rnrnission expires �� , � �. ,.�,a°�'�. ��;�� .��.A I:) " +":, � F.. � p, R Y �"• �-. _ � � � ,�,,,,.,- � � � � � �y' P U � �"' � ; �,�i"�°: : s,, ,�}.�, � ^, �. f,, , � . ' �✓ r,r�g-Q�r• • �.'� , . '�'"�,r�� .� _.--- /�� `' STAT'�: 01� C°'� L„'zm�r�- COtINTY OF � /r�i,��. C,��.�-z..�t � 2c>� � . �..,..,.- � I�cSfary Pu ' ) � SS. ) VAII, "I'IM13t�:R R:IUUE_.L�C> __---�- ,_`�`---�--- � .__ �y; ___-�. ._ Name: t�� ,,.., L-...,��-�c;� �� , t ...� Its: ^ �r�.��=��<�-- + �- "I`he fc�r Toing instrument w�as subscribed, swori� to, and acknowled�cd be;fore mc this ��f��r'1.r.�--n�c+ �-�r' � of Va�l "I'imber I�id�� LLCy �� — ��% as the ��.----- " ___ _.. _.. _._ � (S F A L) My comtnission e�pires: .+.�..r SC3FlA CEREGERE� NOTAfl"r PU$C� i� ��j i0t It1C Jtil@ Ot �fW � �r C,��bgi/t �@%�Pj'tY9l � V1"�V'GiI�J 7 t i,'r �,�zo{}g C': IUOC"1 'A�IF.'-l'hf;WIRF i1,C)C'.A1.5� �t �iF.�4lP;,�'P<,RPt�'I,SE`.TI,tAl1Ei21t/PGE l'R&UlA 6.L)t3C' . _ __ . _ . . .. � , ��,. . ,,... . . � �. � � � � � i � "The Enfire ParceY' LOTS 1 THKOtiGH 5, A RESUBDIVISIUN OFLION`S K[t�GN StiBDlE'ISlt)N BLC)CK C A PAK 1' OF SFCT1(?N t�, TUWN5XIP 5 SOCTTN, RANCiE 81 WEST OF f HE 6rh P.M. TQt1'N OF� VAIL, EAGLE COUN7'Y, COLORAUO � �o�l l �� ..�>> -..,. � "The Adjacent Property" ��.,,5 \' Also known as Exhibit B � � � d .s �,� . � M°.�?. .��,� �o �� ;;a � ,w / w �` R� � \1 : �: ,,�� ' K -a .s w, p O M� LO�T t \ a ��\\ \\'{j' �'`�� % �% � ��yy�/ �j �� 4� � ✓ Lss" .�� . �' � i�;Mi ¢, � ,,.� , rw� PARC£t Q �� a IJpI$ RID(.� 9JWIM19i1H = 4i FkNIG Nn 2 "� � (REC. No. t27219) � ty ra�.� �.w. �.. / ,� �; RAMn��1ri.II5 �`nj��4" R1TA � /fy4'fY Y � ,xc - .�en.�s '�`- mi:s` ,,,�, _ ,�,.M• �. _ ��,. RIdiD r J6T.�6' ' 8kG � NS.I'S`5'OO�E ! i wS' \ � �i YXlY' 1 x ♦M�t4u�r - � y uam . :a.�'t 1. ; i wSeYJ'ro'[ `� �j< a � �' -'�, ' �, � � � � ;x F. �y � � �\ % . � �� w. � A i { �� ` ..=0T. . / � � c�Y`;� ,,,�� . i� �. w .., . T �,�� b,t,\ , m �. �� . �� r ` �K. r� � *1 �, �i�� . S�' �d �� ,�.s, :%1 \1 �� CRLPRFS: Sf,:U,L^ � . : . .. .. i�i- ...___.i� � __... '�_ .. . .........-� ,�'.�^-�:�<...�. � _.�.s.,...�.�.�.;Y:.a�,=�.: . ,.. >«.�,+: .,�*.�,tt«,.�x.. .�.».,Mxw k.,P.�...�.:..-,«�,,...,, w«.��:. ...:-.. � ;° . " �` 5 snwr Huws cauooui�uus SST09�1,'E - g.u.Ze' ; ..�w. ' 'S ,J �<�� yM! J /� � �`"'�---� "The Property" Also known as Exhibit A The {�art�es to this Agrcemrnt hereb� acknowledgc ihat this Fixh9tnt sho4vs fih� approximate bcatit�n af tHe pn�perty lme to be drxuTi betw•eca the Property and thc Ad,�ucent Pmperty, and that th�s HxAibrt wdi t�e �LpiacerJ u�n ihe `Cown's approval of the sut�� ision of the entire parce! depioted on tlus 1 xhibii "f hc replaceme��l exh�brt shall sho�' the esnct locatiau of the property line bet�veen the F'roperty and the Adjacenl Propertg, and �hall pariiculariv d:scritw eaeh separ�te parcei. � �� w�voi�'�� THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on December 14, 2009, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a final review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61- 11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, to allow for the redevelopment .�. of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/ Lots C1- �,.. ^ _.. • C5, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. � (PEC090038) �� \� The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published November 23, 2009, in the Vail Daily. C� � � � � s i i , uoNS wocE �oor s 5 Fc� i ` � b I � �� 4 3 ��PROPERTYIME//-`/� � PROPERNLME � Z 2 LIOMS RI�GE LOOP � �� i HIGFNJAV 70 � SECTION DIAGRAM 2 � i SECTION DIAGRAM 1 HIGHWAV 70 I / LION5 RIOGE LOOP / � �- � � . �' �`�° ' � �o ' HIGMNAV 70 2 / � SECTION DIAGRAM 3 � /� / LIOMS RIDGE LOOP �DOe / / � �1 . � / � --- ��\�G� � � � J \ \ � i � ? roe oF aeraNir+c wu �.�� ri�'i ' \ \ HIGHWAY70 � � / / . SECTION �IAGRRM 4 �'FC / � �. % // � � O / � / I%�/ .,� � . uor��sRiocEi -- s y � i �/� �.'` f�.��oo� .� 3` —� tcC�j, / / ♦ %/ 0 fwsxe�n. C> � � i /^ /�%� ( �GV o `� � `@ � /� % y/% % 1� � � a i � � �i. i��i � i� � � � � � ��7 wcHwnr�o i\ ��ii�i�i y ot` p'�EQ'� SECTION DIAGRHM 5 � � � �� . �i � j / � � F'� _ / _.�0, i� , i , , � ,� / i �// / / � i� ii�/ � i �i i . /� � i//i ,� Gi �i iii/i � i� �i i jii � ��j /i� j �j � /� i � ` � ��i �i�i � ii � i / ii �i�i � ii i ��i ii�i i ii i\ /�i �i��i/ i� �iij�ii ��ii �� i i�ii iiiii � i i�i, iiii i� i i � �i iiii�i �; �." / i ii ii�i i i e4' � i iii�i� i i / �j/ iii�i �.w , �� / �///J/�/�: ii � ii� / � �i*'i� �/ //� i� / j/� � � :�� )` � �� , / � � - / f ./ . , /� � / d` � r i ; /r/ / � \� ' I�1` � G�i ..�� y /+�/ / � �� / J / � .�.�\ � �� / ( �( \ \\ I % � / .'iii ii �i i ii/i� ; ,,,, ,. ii% /./.!% / /� r ♦ ��/ � `. ;-� / ♦ � ,i s — �� / ,� � , �,.f.� :,) � v,�� i�`. �P �'�� . ' �{�� .t _.� �`` �� . /, � �% .% • �� ''' �� .�� / �`�� r�►�. 4 �� '� � � � !� ' 6 � i/jAl� ;� '�� w� �i:�/�� ,.f w• �I� ,�' /° / *� � � r � . ��' ':.r.� . ��--�/ �.� �►��'� , . .. .._ � O• / Py� �� G ♦ � �� ' � � � �' 45.SYe PAEOROOM 54.5� pVEMGENETSF: 779 WFA 6 CO�FUi� iON0.�.0E SQUPAE FOOiTGE GPOM EXIEIIIIX! FA(£ OF ILL EXIERpR FFME WkL5T1UT �SE �,C SaFCE. R DOES N�TIN2WE VPipS. &4CUNES. PAmiBRLLONV5i00.4GE PROPERN UNE LOT AREA: 524 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: H (HOUSING) TOTAL UNITS: 352 DENSITY: fi7 UNITS PER ACRE BUILDING HEIGHT: SSTORY CLUBHOUSE:5356 SP. BUILDING GROSS AREA: 305,400 SF. GARAGE GROSS AREA:164250 SF. SIDEWALKS: 10,600 Sf. PARKING & DRIVEWAYS:35,675 SF. BUILDING COVERAGE: 94 100 SF. ( 41 q) SNOW STORAGE AREA:13,800 SF. ( 30% PAVED AREA) LANDSCAPE AREA: 68,736 SF.1.58 ACRES ( 305o SITE AREA ) PARKING RE�UIRED:1.5 SPACES FOR UNRS LESS THAN SOO SF. 2 SPACES FOR UNITS MORE THAN 500 SF. TOTAL 693 SPACES REQUIRED WITHOUT REDUCTION TOTAL 520 SPACES REQUIRED WITH 25% REDUCTION ( 25% COMPACT CAR SPACES ALLOWED ) PARKING PROVIDED: GARAGE: 5235PACES SURFACE: 36SPACES TOTAL: 559 SPACES INCLUDING 106 COMPACT SPACES (19%), 12 HANDICAP SPACES (1.6 SPACES PER UNIT ) NP. PARKING STALL: 9' X 19' (SURFACE); 9' x 24' ( PARALLEL) 9' X 18' ( GARAGE ) B' X i6' ( COMPACT) ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN /N\ SCALE: 1'=40'-0' u�I 0 40 BO 16n � � 17'-0' A1 391SF.(AC) 17'-0' ,1.�� 4 4 _ � 4 � � 37'-0' �� I � �� p (��) � � � - �. � U � Ir � : ,.,, I � � � : u �-� A3 647 SF. ( AC � 34'-0" � 61-1ST 61-2ND-5TH 782SF.(AC) 806SF.�AC� 4 4 � UNIT PLANS A-301 o � • 32'-0" ------ � W.I.C. DINING BATH2 a•xs BEDROOM2 � 10' x N'E' � � AT -_ � —� 1 ��k'. �� '�,O '�, I � I KffCHEN 893S.�AC) - ,�� Y.:� � ■ : �•�� W.I.C. 4 �..�,�. -- — � W.I.C. � aan� s � _ 11'd' X 12'-10' 0 62-TOP 990 SF. ( AC ) LIVING 12' x 14'�" � � ❑�❑ 0 BEDROOMI ❑ 17 x 14'-7 KIiCHEN ; 4 � BATH 1 � W.�.�. , UNIT PLANS A-302 • Zs�-� r B3-1 ST 926 Sf. ( AC � �J 2s�-„• 63 960 SF. ( AC � u UNIT PLANS A-303 VAIL TIMBER RIDGE a'�°�°"""""""`a'""'""�" 'E�s ` TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO � r. . ya�,Emsaep�iaan n n�e �. i- p i N v� - r i Mryo�mcs� aretnes�leproFerlioiHumpney5 � only. Revsansmayocw tl- 1 (vn�ermvzstl�abonfrom . . � - � - g`"° � ' `� '° °°°� " °' '° ` 's � "` HPA# 2009024 �-� � ��ru� �a�, a �, � � - ��,�� 19/21I2009 - HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS L,P, 6339 �,Ip�.o R000. Sul�e 3J0 Dollas 7X 75J�.C� i; 7„ �0�.-9e36 19721 701-9639 � � � or e�s com � p�. p is.com ��IIl.� C�:.. C.IVF I2.I.F I's�.FG-S 1.. _�-IFa' r l,[:� y; OI?L4".:10 PNOH:IX VAIL TIMBER RIDGE ""�"`�"""'"""`&'""T"`"� `" ' TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS L.P, Tlu g � EeD� I tl F 'n A G� � I . �t I N DI f f hil �YL �D � ar ihe d 0 PQ�YdH p� ys o I R ,, y tl rol M h hg f. , 9639 8Pr1 ��ArcA! Is.LG �C av �eg�a ry h dEUlltl q E ly D, Ions 5399AIp^.oROOO SJ e.S�G D I 5lX /�7�f � 1 70 -96 5�'972�701. �o�� a��a�,�, s, a 9�� Y.��, ,�a�� 11/21/2009 - HPA#2009024 , �rph«,. <��„ ,ph��s� ,, � �wilnoulXSwOUenpermsswn draxingsW�ecnneelif -.auonanameasuemems. � _ . . � . � � - D.>LLF,S CyA2017E IR.If.F LAS\'EC> S `JF�1.02LE?,.� hC11 FO�-k Of?tHNrJO PhOfI:IX �� ]0[19 t>y NUMPNREYS & PARTNERS �. I Ci' LP iY�ear. ,ge�. h0 p ieJheren Archt W I awalsrt pl� are(orkasW"yp�ryose aret�esdep�operl�o�HUm�M1reys oniy.Re�AsronsmayorwE�-bluMerinvesh�au�nfmm 8P3: � Ach'.e�s.LPa�dmay eoul larye�'�o sa.�db 1..:�4�oEea.alyss. D�� , _ � z�.yf��^ l� I R f_..�_ � ri^il � VAIL TIMBER RIDGE TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 11/21/2009 - HPA# 2009024 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS L.P, 5339 �lo^a I?ooa, S�i�e 300 UoB�_ ix /57'G [�1 �; �0--4636 (972� 701-9639 - .: �' • t pl E"/S.cC iiCJ �,S.COm ,au�.- �+ ��.,iE u< u r �-,�.F�... . .. -�F, r � F� -�: o�i�.�:-,n proFwix ?� 2009 try XUMPNREYS & PARiNERS A� M C 5 LP � � �1Ma�angemen;sdepic�e��ere�� Nchi I' I p 1 eD�^saretalzasbi'vypu�jcse aremesdepmPenydH�.v�wh�eys only Revkwnsmayoccu EuxbfurtherinvesAgamnfmm � � BPa� A 1 �,LP dcar rea�l ry F .tl� le 9 a' ly' D� �C�.�. �t� . i,s.. .ri. �tio�. . ��a -., � _i_ . i .i ., �. . � � VAIL TIMBER RIDGE � TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 11121/2009 - HPA# 2009024 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS L.P, 5339 AIp`�p Rood. 5ui 2 3�0 I�oIbS. IX 75JGp ��i7; 70��-9636 '97?J 70'-9639 .. /N I /S,CC . lg. �I 'sC� IaLLG_ .�. {—? GIIF IL.I 4 �S h,—1 I�, 021F,1 . f) rJ.K ifl� �9 PF-04'tT. � �� 2M cbyM11MYMNEYS&PARTNERS . "I-CS L. ' 'sCcpwte�hINe' PrcM1 t I � pW I pl � � f baSlxTyp eeetM1 d D De'�volHwnp�rcys only Revl'os ayocru.tluebfuM1 � vesOga�niron 8Pa AcYec=.lP �=ol ry sa:l�I M aly� D N��s � �_i�� ra. _ i �.I=..: .ci.l � VAIL TIMBER RIDGE TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE:COUNTY, COLORADO 11I21/2009 - HPA# 2009024 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS L.P, 53�9 �Ip^� R�oc, wi�e 370 Dallas. ix 75?�0 1> i'; �� -4636 (972� 761-9639 � �r cis.co . �<e i-g t I is.com .:IIF_ :�=: ��if'r,l I.F . C�.FC� C�dF. n-lF,a f_�F'; V: ORL4`.l0 PHOH:IX � L�J � a 3 � � � m � 0 0 z z � y 3S � a 3 0 � �$ �a z� F5 U �0 3's u � !; 2IX V trv NUMPMREYS & PARiNERS F. C I.EC lP lnear g.. . e�o an A¢n � � ..I v� r � �tycu�o�e areVasolep�Ge�Y°�H�mDh. ys cri�y. ft s mayocw tl elo(url.�e i e_figawnf�om dPa± 0. h .LPar,t y regul y d I .c' ah _ 5 .:r r� , -rw� . .. ia.. ..r .,. ..c,o ... _ . .. i. , i � i . , . , �,. . � VAIL TIMBER RIDGE � TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 11/21I2009 - HPA# 2009024 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS L.P, 5339'Vpho Rootl, Sul'e 3�0 Dollos iX /t?�0 (/�� 70 96 rF 19� �I �0 �-9639 � mohreVS.com �e'��g �PI � .c •� �> ` ).%.11!-= C�i.t� On� II<,I.F -/+Sl'�-G S 1F�: C�?IF� r��F�.1: )I�I�':�O PI-OH'f� C TOV * News Release * 10/28/2009 T<>tiv n of Va ii News Reiease Timber Ridge Conceptual Plans Shown � o,� � �>,,� ;� oc�� Page 1 of 1 � To4vn af Uaii r�view tic�c�rc3s had their first look at r�roposeci pians for recievelopment oF Tirnber Ridye during a joint rn a€7 C�ct 27. Di.i��irrc� the pre-applic�tion conference, repre�sentatives fr�m Vaii Timber Ridge, LLC presented ir7ilial �rchitecturai reriderings shawing a Pive�-story builcling extending H00 feet alor�g the 5-acre tlevelopment site, wtiich represents hal'f the property. The conceptuai dcvelc�pment (�lan includes the foilowing coit7ponents: •;56 units, ranging fram 390 sq. ft. for � studio i3p to a 96ti sq. ft. 2�-bedroom, 2- batti. Includes 23 stuclio iiniis, i� bc�droam units �ticl 1.9£, 7-bedroam units. «!i-Icuei �.7arking garar3e, represef7ting 1.7 parking spaces per unit. • bV�sher �nd dryer in each unit. • Fitness cet�ter and clublioi.ase. ;, Mem[�er��s t�f the Vai! Town Council, Pl�nriing anci Gi�vir�anrr�ei�ita3 Gomrriission, D�sigri Review B<7r�rd, Va+i Lacai Housin A��thority and [tie Timt�er Riclye Afford�bie Hausir�c� f.;arporation attencied the rr2eetir�g, The �resenYatic�r3 faHowed apK>rqvai af a pre-t�eveloprnenT �c��,eemenY by the V�i! °fvwr� coiancii khat �ravid2s for khe i'ollowir�ta: •,A !onc7 terrri c�ra��nd lease of 6U ycars 4��ilh rer7cwals wtrc�re�tt�c_� Towr7 of Vaii retains awnership �f khe pzjrcei. m R �ne tirt�e u�� front paymc�nt of �l.l million to tl7e Tc�ivr� �t V�ii. . A t:omrY�itrr�F_,nt tc�'sut�mit �� complefie cleveloprr�er�t ap��lic�tion to the iown Vail by Aprii 1, 2O10. + iiie i�evel<�prn�r�t sh�il incii�cie ;59 �itiploy�e tieus+ng Units (EHtJs), c��i�le oP ho��siz�g 570 ejnpioyeFS, with the w 1�alf c�F tt�e sit� r�_maining o�erational rJUr�'ing th� re�f�rvelopment. • Tt�e T�'>vvn <'�f V�;i tivili refund the [e»�ri�'s consk�ri.iction use t�x and waive a!! c�tt�er builciir�g and +nspection fer s. . i t�ie Town uf Vaii will share irr cosC r�f rac.k fail i7iitigativn if any is required. . The Tov�Jn of Vail ar�rees to reimburse tt�e poteni:iai cleveloper � m�xirrrurr� arnount of �1 rr�illion if ihe T�wri oF� Vail I �1cliver tl�c prt�pert�y. • E:3ott� the Toti^�n �f Vaii anc} Vail Timber Ricige, Ll_C �yree to conduct at I�ast ane pre-app{ication c.onferer�ce with thc C'oiaE��ii, the Drsign Keview Board ;DREi} ancl the Pianr�inr� �nci Fnviroi�r��ntt31 Commission {PEC} {zri�r ko subrr�itting � i��i+.iai devefo{�ment applicatioi�s. None of thE: above c�roups tivili i�e boi�nd by disc�zssions in Yhe predevelopment confer Next st�ns includc aclditionai meetings tivith the Colorado Departnient af 1"rans;�ort�tion, utilities anci the fire departrr prlor to s�l��nitta! of the clevelo�ament. appiication. Cornmunity Development Director George �utl�er I�as ir�dic.ated thE developrne.nt� review process wiil Cake arr estiit�ated six months. C:c�nstrucked in 1981, Timbcr Ridge is Vail's largesl c�mployee hdusing complex, Cansistiny vf 19E3 renta) units an just ten ar.res. The toL+:n acc�uired the property in 2003 for �;20 millic�n to pres��eve the pro{aerty's cJced rr:.�tricted emplc�ye he�usinc� dc�st�nation. (:o��yrlrht '<;' ?{)Q9 j Towi7 ct Jai1 75 `. P'r�ontac�c �io2�r1, VaV4, CU 6l6�7 ;'oli P��z�: �'r3&6; 65D-902�f�' !;��7(?i 47�?-21t)0 ., .- � ,�. �. . http://www.vailgov.com/releaseprint.asp?release_id=5134 11/23/2009 � � � Vail Timber Ridge Design and Development Schedule Vlay � � TOWN OF VAI� ; Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road [jail, Colorado 81 G57 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www. vailgov. com November 25, 2009 Mr. Lee Thomas Jordan Construction Services 9639 Greenville Avenue Dallas, Texas 75243 Dear Lee, The purpose of my letter is to provide you with written confirmation of the zoning designation of the Timber Ridge redevelopment site. According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, the Timber Ridge redevelopment site, located at 1280 North Frontage Road, is zoned Housing (H) District. The development standards for the Housing District are prescribed in Chapter 6, Article I, of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. In summary, the purpose of the Housing District is to provide sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other residential zone districts. A more detail description of the Housing District can be found on the Town's website at www.vailqov.com. Should you have any questions with regard to the information outlined in this letter please do not hesitate to call. You can reach me most easily by telephone at (970) 376- 2675. Sincerely, � �� George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail � �� RECYCLED PAPER TO: FROM: DATE MEMORANDUM Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Communify Development Department December 14, 2009 SUBJECT: A request for a work session for review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code to allow for the redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 359 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) f� � � Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation Planner: George Ruther SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman, of Pylman & Associates, are requesting a work session with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to present the proposed redevelopment plans and to discuss the development review applications for the redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, located at 1280 North Frontage Road. Presentation and discussion topics include: • A presentation of the preliminary plans (site plan, landscape plan, grading plan, building elevations, etc.) • A presentation of the preliminary development statistics (density controls, parking requirement, building height, setbacks, GRFA, site coverage, etc.) • A discussion of the Housing (H) zone district development standards and development review process • A discussion of the proposed land uses and the development standard/criteria for evaluation • Summary of the proposed schedule and next steps in the development review process DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicants are proposing to redevelop the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Apartments development site and construct a five-story tall building extending 800 feet along the Nor�h Frontage Road (Attachment A— Vicinity Map). The new building will contain up to 359 new employee housing units capable of housing 570 employees with the existing uvestern half of the site remaining operational throughoutthe redevelopment process. A new 1 five-level enclosed, parking garage will be constructed on the site along with improved public transit facilities to meet the minimum parking and transportation needs of the development. A reduced copy of the preliminary plans are attached for reference (Attachment B). As this is a work session, the applicants and staff are not requesting a final review at this time. Instead, the Commission is being asked to actively engage in a presentation and discussion about the project. As such, the staff recommends that the Commission provides direction on the following questions: The applicants shall be required to submit a complete application to the Town of Vail Community Development for review. According to the Zoning Regulations, the Administrator may require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samples, and other materials if deemed necessary to properly evaluate a proposal. Are there any additional submittal materials that the Commission requires of the applicants to ensure that the proposal can be properly evaluated? A letter to the applicants dated December 1, 2009, has been attached to the memorandum. The purpose of this letter was to provide the applicants with a summary of input and comments shared by the Town staff and the Design Review Board during a series of organizational meetings held the week of November 16, 2009. The applicants have not fully incorporated the comments into the current preliminary plans. Instead, the applicants have indicated that the plan sets will be revised once input and comments from the Planning and Environmental Commission is provided. Based upon the Commission's understanding of the preliminary plans, what additional input or comment does the Commission have at this time for the applicants? III. BACKGROUND The Town of Vail acquired the Timber Ridge Apartments property in 2003 for $20 million to preserve the property's deed restricted employee housing designation. Constructed in 1981, Timber Ridge is Vail's largest employee housing complex, currently consisting of 198 rental apartment units on ten acres. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Town Code Housing (H) Zone District 12-6/-1: PURPOSE: The housing district is intended to provide adequate sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for otherresidential zoning districts. It is necessary in this district to provide development standards specifically prescribed for each development proposal or project to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as conditional uses, which are intended to be incidental and secondary to the residential uses � 2 � of the district. The housing district is intended to ensure that employee housing permitted in the district is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the allowed types of uses. 12-61-2: PERMITTED USES: The following uses shail be permitted in the H district: Deed restricted employee housing units, as further described in chapter 13 of this title. Passive outdoor recreation areas, and open space. Pedestrian and bike paths. 12-61-3: CONDITIONAL USES: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the H district, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title: Commercial uses which are secondary and incidental (as determined by the planning and environmental commission) to the use of employee housing and specifically serving the needs of the residents of the development, and developed in conjunction with employee housing, in which case the following uses may be allowed subject to a conditional use permit: Banks and financial institutions. Eating and drinking establishments. Funiculars, and other similar conveyances. Health clubs. Personal services, including, but not limited to, laundromats, beauty and barbershops, tailor shops, and similar services. Retail stores and establishments. Dwelling units (not employee housing units) subject to the following criteria to be evaluated by the planning and environmental commission: A. Dwelling units are created solely for the purpose of subsidizing employee housing on the property, and 8. Dwelling units are not the primary use of the property. The GRFA for dwelling units shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total GRFA constructed on the property, and C. Dwelling units are only created in conjunction with employee housing, and D. Dwelling units are compatible with the proposed uses and buildings on the site and are compatible with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. Outdoor patios. Public and private schoo/s and educational institutions, including daycare facilities. Public buildings and grounds. Public parks. Public utilities installations including transmission lines and appurtenant equipment. Type VI employee housing units, as further regulated by chapter 13 of this title. 12-61-4: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the H district: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of section 12-14-12 of this title. Minor arcades. 3 Private greenhouses, tool sheds, playhouses, attached garages or carports, swimming pools, or recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditronal uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12-6/-5: SETBACKS: The setbacks in this district shall be twenty feet (20) from the perimeter of the zone district. At the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, variations to the setback standards may be approved during the review of a development plan subject to the applicant demonstrating compliance with the following criteria: A. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. 8. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. C. Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. D. Proposed building setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. Variations to the twenty foot (20) setback shall not be allowed on property lines adjacent to HR, SFR, R, PS, and RC zoned properties, un/ess a variance is approved by the planning and environmental commission pursuant to chapter 17 of this title. 12-6/-6: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed fifty five percent (55%) of the total site area. At the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, site coverage may be increased if seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking spaces are underground or enclosed, thus reducing the impacts of surface paving provided within a development, and that the minimum landscape area requirement is met. 12-61-7: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT.� At least thirty percent (30%) of the total site area shall be landscaped. The minimum width and length of any area qualifying as landscaping shall be fifteen feet (15) with a minimum area not less than three hundred (300) square feet. 12-6/-8: PARKING AND LOADING: Off street parking shal! be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. No parking or loading area shall be located within any required setback area. At the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, variations to the parking standards outlined in chapter 10 of this title may be approved during the review of a development plan subject to a parking management plan. The parking management plan shall be approved by the planning and environmental commission and shall provide for a reduction in the parking requirements based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than chapter 10 of this titfe would require. For example, a demonstrated need for a reduction in the required parking could include: A. Proximity or availability of alternative modes of transportation including, but not limited to, public transit or shuttle services. 4 � B. A limitation placed in the deed restrictions limiting the number of cars for each unit. C. A demonstrated permanent program including, but not limited to, rideshare programs, carshare programs, shuttle service, or staggered work shifts. 12-61-9: LOCATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: A. Limitation; Exception: All conditionai uses by section 12-61-3 of this article shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted loading areas and such activities as may be specifically authorized to be unenclosed by a conditional use permit and the outdoor display of goods. B. Outdoor Display Areas: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. 12-61-10: OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the H district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as proposed by the applicant, as prescribed by the planning and environmental commission, and as adopted on the approved development plan: 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Building heighf. 3. Density control (including gross residential floor area). 12-61-11: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRED: A. Compatibility With Intent: To ensure the unified development, the protection of the natural environment, the compatibility with the surrounding area and to assure that development in the housing district will meet the intent of the district, a development plan shall be required. 8. Plan Process And Procedures: The proposed development plan shall be in accordance with section 12-61-12 of this article and shall be submitted by the developer to the administrator, who shall refer it to the planning and environmental commission, which shall consider the plan at a regularly scheduled meefing. C. Hearing: The public hearing before the planning and environmental commission shali be held in accordance with section 12-3-6 of this title. The planning and environmental commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with conditions or modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the planning and environmental commission may be appealed to the town council in accordance with section 12-3-3 of this title. D. Plan As Guide: The approved development plan shall be used as the principal guide for all development within the housing district. E. Amendment Process: Amendments to the approved development plan will be considered in accordance with the provisions of section 12-9A-10 of this title. F. Design Review Board Approval Required: The development plan and any subsequent amendments thereto shall require the approval of the design review board in accordance with fhe applicable provisions of chapter 11 of this title prior to the commencement of site preparation. 12-61-12: DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTENTS: 5 The administrator shall establish the submittal requirements for a development plan �" application. A complete list of the submittal requirements shall be maintained by the administrator and filed in the department of community development. Certain submittal requirements may be waived and/ormodified by the administratorand/orthe reviewing body if it is demonstrated by the applicant that the information and materials required are not relevant to the proposed development or applicable to the planning documents that comprise the Vail comprehensive plan. The administrator and/or the reviewing body may require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samp/es and other materials if deemed necessary to properly evaluate the proposal. 12-6/-13: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, sca/e, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesfhetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environrr�ental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other applicable plans. Section 12-17 Variances 12-17-1: PURPOSE: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: ln order to prevent or to /essen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives ofthis title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic orphysical conditions on the site orin the immediate vicinity; or from other ph ysical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. 8. Development Standards Excepted: Variances may be granted only with respect to the deve%pment standards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site dimensions, setbacks, distances between buildings, height, density control, 6 � building bulk control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site development, and parking and loading requirements; or with respect to the provisions of chapter 19 of this fitle, governing physica! development on a site. V. VI C. Use Regulations NotAffected: The powerto grant variances does not extend to the use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is provided by chapter 16, "Conditional Use Permits", and by section 12-3-7, "Amendment" of this title. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 1280 North Frontage Road Legal Description: Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Filing No. 1 Zoning: Housing District Land Use Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Current Land Use: Medium Density Residential Dwellings Lot Size: 5.24 acres/ 228,254 square feet Geologically Sensitive Areas: High Severity Rockfall Development Standard Min. Lot Area: Min. Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Max. Building Height: Max. GRFA: Max. Site Coverage: Min. Landscape Area: Required determined by PEC 20' (north) 20' (east) 20' (west) 20' (south) determined by PEC determined by PEC 55% unless at least 75% of parking is covered and approved by the PEC 30% Min. Parking: Per Chapter 10 (693 spaces), or a max. 25% reduction (520 spaces) approved by the PEC based upon the Parking Management Plan provided SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Current Land Use Zonin 7 Proposed 228,254 sq. ft(5.24 acres) 25' (north) 20' (east) 50' (west) 54' (south) 95' (tower element) 71' (building) 252,994 sq. ft. 91,100 sq. ft. (41 %) 68,736 sq. ft. (30°/a) 548 spaces Land Use Desiqnation VII North: Residential South: Interstate 70 ROW East: Residential West: US Postal Service CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Two-Family Primary/Secondary Not Zoned High Density Multiple Family Residential High Density Multiple Family Residential Low Density Residential Not Designated High Density Residential High Density Residential The review criteria and findings for evaluation for thE review and consideration of an Approved Development Plan are prescribed in Section 12-61-13 of the Zoning Regulations. According to Section 12-61-13, the following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria. A list of the appficable design criteria are outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. As this is a work session, neither the staff nor applicant will be responding directly to the review criteria at this time. Instead, the list of the criteria is provided to educate the applicants of their obligation to demonstrate compliance and to inform the Commission of the standards by which the proposal shall be reviewed. 12-61-13: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the pr�ed development plan complies with all appticable design criteria. A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation s compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and, when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system is designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. E�3 � F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other applicable plans. (Ord. 29(2005) § 23: Ord. 19(2001) § 2: Ord. 3(2001) § 2) VI11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As this is a work session, staff will not be making a recommendation at this time. Staff will provide a formal recommendation prior to the final review of the development review applications. IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Preliminary Plan Set C. Letter to the applicant dated December 1, 2009 � ' � � � _ � O Tirn�ber Ridgr� Aparfiner�� t� Lnts '/-5, B/aek C, Lions Ridge Filing 1 (t280 /Vorth Front�ge Raaci West� � -�� .��: '�:4"^"4' n;X�. '� � .:N""� Subject Rruperty � u 15o ireet , ��.�,�, . , u, � , � -� , , � �r ,. ,�,. ,. . ...s .> � ;. �, 306 G00 � �� ,..iti,or, � ee erma� ._�r� �r,Nx�+�v � � � � � sF . �« � . cd ,�� ` LIONSRIDGELOOP � ' Oy /� � 1 � i -- - ��PROPEF(YIINE l 4 3 � -- � e p �'� .pa_ � � i �//: p LIOMSR�OliEl00P _ __ � � .� �I / �� : I� 'm..__-1_ L HIOHWAYlO � � lj' /' r�Y�% / y_..i�..Y. ,�1�__._`�_..._._ � '�` HIGHWAY)0 f Y 6ELTIONOIAG9M13 � �. ; � � �� SEGIroN DNCA�M 1 j �� y EI i/ � 1�P( LIOASRiWEL00P e K y`� � � � . __ `n ` F � i / y\ , ' �va ' - . __..... ' �c ; � � .— lj / �, v � " O `��:�_a. -` y�' / � '� �� `�, �i NI�HWAYiO � ' sccnoriouowws i � . ` q 1. �6p� - nQ ' � �— �//� LIONS PIOGE LOOP 4 � �y �,v_�i � / ,"� < \ `� / � �� . � ��Q�JF' � ` / ,'�f' �, � �e�¢+. ��i �s � _J /'i' <<� 0"= I 'r _+• +� i0E0FREfNNiNGWILV/ �.�0• / /� /r � 1 HI6NWAYiO � \` fi ;✓�/':��. \ � �_\�_�— i- � -- secriori owow+M a Z— N't2 , x �/r' ,� r°°a i ` ` Sj � ` � %u dt j � � � '� s °�'� � � �; /��5 � '� � �—,i � uwrseioce� Jk i , � ` ,� �', � �o oe �,.:�' �r�� _— �-,' �T� / ��f ` l / �`�o �.�, , . � �,'"��r��g'�? �' � f �,m � /, � �.r.:� r;;` �� .�" � .ti. q� SECTIQY �NORW 6 � 1�i ifd-'F -'l'/ ,��.�i; i� � j / : � ��i ..✓, j % .. � ��`��. r � � J " /v/ � � � � �� / \ � %� . . �� %/ . �' � _ i / " " � ��%/ � •�� ; . � '� � � �� f �,�% / / � � ,� � :: i / Wn+° / , / �� f� .. � / � �� r � / /��1 � / �� h � t ��/�� ";,` r � ' \ � ��i � �� d`� y \� /I ,��c� ,�' i; II �S // , . � / / � ,,� L�� Y / �� /�f:� / , � : t � �/K� �� _ / � � � / � �� r � �i '� \ /�°r `/ ,, �a�� '>� „��_ �� rr ��^� � ✓ f � �,, � .�'� , , ,�� .. ., �\ � FASEMENi PROPEpttLINE I �\ I ��' �, ?_�C l � % � . LOT AREA 52d ACRCS CURREM 20NING: H (HOUSING) TOTAL UNITS: 352 DENSITY: 67 UNRS PER ACRE BUILOING HEIGHT: SSTORY ClU9H0U5E'.53565F. BUIIDING GROSS ARFA 305,400 SF. GARAGE GRO55 AREA: 164,250 SF. �SIOEN'ALKS: 70,fi00 6F_ PAfiKING 8 DRIVEWAYS:35,675 SF. BUR�ING COVERAGE� 94 700 SF. (41%) SNOW STORAGE ARFA:13,800 SF. ( 30%PAVED AREA) LANDSCAPE AREA: 68,736 SF.1.58 ACRES ( 30 k SRE AREA � PARKING REOUIRED'.1.5 SPACES FOR UNITS LE55 THAN 500 SF, 2 SPACES FOft UNITS MORE THAN 50a SF. TOTAL 693 SPACES RE�UIREO WITHOUT REDUCTION TOTAL 5205PACES REOUIftE� WRH 25 % ftEDUCTION ( 25%COMPACT CAR SPACES ALIOWED ) PARKING PROVIOE�: GARAGE. 5203PACE5 SURFACE: 28SPACES TOTPL 5485PACE5 INCLUDING 106 COMPACT SPACES ( 79%),12 HANDICAP SPACES (1.8 SPACES PER IINIT ) NP. PARKING STALL. 9 X 19 (SUftFACE); 9' z 44' ( PARALLEL) 6 X 18 ( GARAGE 1 8 % 76 ( COMPACT) ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN �� s�n�E ,•-,�.a• �, � .� ao �,� iT-0' ' 31'-0" �� __ - -- -----_ .fi ,__ -- — ------ __.__ „—.,- "'e'q" "" � NIiGHEN_ - T'gM 9 i f. � NI ❑ � ILIVNG ,rx,r � I � I._. ,� �� I ❑ I�—'I _ �k— '_" ' _" 79 SF.(qC) _.._ _ ,TO• • — ---__ .-- --- � �— k_ ��'o� A2 --�,�.-�A�; .._ �;�3�i I iI ;�._—_ ___ __—. — . � - :.._._'r_' — tn.k=—: ___-_ __ .—_ —_ I � ._ � O ... — .._._— '—E-._�._.___..... C ' , INC,�DI ING I � . .� ' 1'. .1� � La_ ; _. � BE�ROOM 7 .... . . ... BE�IiWM 1 4'; iam•,fr-r � � -�, taia�xfrr �; I "" "" i { __ - T "" � i � � - � i � � �� I a+n�z iI�,�J Krtrx�n ,�'✓ aatn� i� '1 �' �� iJ1MH�,,�� .- �...a_e.... �� I � — � � B1•1ST Bt•2ND•5TH 7�SF.�AC) ___ .._. 67fiSF.�AC� __._. � � W��' I /��I. DhYIN6. I � BA1H2 /�J ��-A �BfDR00M2 '� iIPx11� '—_y — C i y�i _. �.,=.y J : ❑ LM�c _.... li'x7P ........._ � _._ __. �._ � � � — �o� ��' _ 27-11' KITCHENI � � W.I.C. � �' - ze�-,r ----- --- ---- -- ----- '� _..� — I� '_—" __' "_ � i A1 >'� '�, f, BEDROOM� ;�' F� &1iNP � • J ,. U � /^� < <� �� J ._ --..m... � � � � a .p . — • . .. ii e. . � . _. . ��r`r. �'� ��.7 ��l I� wi.c. / '��'I�' � KRCHEN � � � LIVBIGIDINWG �' �{�+--�,� tGA'X1J'S .'f � � I �L�J'" I I � 71'J� � �— I B� �! ' X1/' I,.___j' �� •� �\� —I ''��--_. _ � ........_ _.__._.. _..._'___'_' 83 .—�.9�SF.�,1C�__._ 63-1ST �SF�A�; UNIT Pl.ANS A-300 o � � e � �' BUILDING FLOOR PLAN • SECOND LEVEL BUILDING FLOOR PLAN - FIRST LEVEL 5°^�E ,'`�'-0' BLDG, PLANS °' '--°� A-401 BUILDING FLOOR PLAN - 5TH BUILDING FLOOR PLAN - 3RD-4TH S�A`E ,•-3°�-°� — �--- o� � �� ,za BLDG. PLANS A-402 � � � o � �' BUILDING FLOOR PLAN - TOP LEVEL SCALE i"=30'-0" o. �� ,zo BLDG.PLANS A-403 =; `. . . . . i .. � . . . FRONT ELEVATION ELEVATION � � � � 0 � LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION ELEVATION A-502 � � � 0 � g � �.. sa � Q � � 0 �, , � � E�L� �aa , �.��,� � i� - �i � � �.�� usnro�ar � � � � � CLUBHOUSE SECOND FLOOR PIAN r __ � � �,�.� � � x�a . � a �� --�- � . �� o - �� v� - � � �� , �� f O � ,1.— ; � � � � KK' ,,°� � � �� ,y,s � � � �,p. �� " M,� ��, � � L :: � � J � � �J �_� �'' v, � � � � �v� U �� CLUBHOUSE FIRST FLOOR PLAN ""E--'�'"'° -- — — — — -- o : —'s „ . _,�,AL5S�5wETAC.SF CLUBHOUSE FLOOR PLANS A-801 � °�� 9 �� p x � � '�� 3 ,',.� �...v.a*��' 1 �r��+ WOOD BALCONY DETAIL VENEER � � �� y � � ARTISAN HARDIE BOARD SHINGLE ROOF � �� •s� � ��€ �,� � raq� E � �� "� � f &�� R�! �. :£ � � . �� i "• :�'•1 1' �7 � �; � �I� �� II � ° �� 1.. H:.;:„ . .. . .. "��At��.�a�'� �, i�'. .� � r 1 � � �VY�V�� ` �� WOOD BRACKETAND PASCIA DETAIL �_ I ^I c' r r �_.�. DECORATNE WOOD HEADER-- WOOD RAFTER TAIL iruri _ �� Furav n�rnu � 20 �.7 � � I Attachment C: December 1, 2009 Mr. Lee Thomas Jordan Construction Services 9639 Greenville Avenue Dallas, Texas 75243 Dear Lee, Thank you for taking the time to come to Vail to meet and discuss your plans for the redevelopment of a Timber Ridge. The purpose of my letter is to provide you with a written summary of the comments and input that was shared with you and your design team with regards to your pending development application for the Timber Ridge redevelopment site. Our comments are based upon the preliminary review of your conceptual site p�an and conceptual front elevation drawing. Conceptual Plans According to the conceptual plans, I understand the proposed project to include the following: • 356 units, ranging from 390 sq. ft. for a studio up to 960 sq. ft. for a 2— bedroom/2 — bathroom unit • 5-level parking garage containing 1.7 parking spaces per unit plus surface parking • On-site fitness center and resident's clubhouse Zoninq Designation According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, the Timber Ridge redevelopment site, located at 1280 North Frontage Road, is zoned Housing (H) District. The development standards for the Housing District are prescribed in Chapter 6, Article I, of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. In summary, the purpose of the Housing District is to provide sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other residential zone districts. A more detail description of the Housing District can be found on the Town's website at www.vailqov.com. Desiqn Review Board Initial Comments On November 18, 2009, the Town of Vail Design Review Board (DRB) held a public hearing were a conceptual review of the proposed plans was completed. Based upon the information provided to the Board, the following input was provided: 21 � Please provide a complete design review application pursuant to the submittai requirements prescribed by the Vail Town Code, prior to a request for final review. • Please indicate the depth of the proposed exterior balconies • Please provide elevation drawings which illustrate the proposed building drawing in context with the adjacent existing structures (ie, western %2 of Timber Ridge and Savoy Villas) • The Vail Town Code requires visual screening and buffering of surface parking lots and prescribes a minimum interior parking lot area landscape requirement. Please demonstrate compliance with these provisions on the site and landscape plan sets. • The architecture and design scheme proposed shall be applied seamlessly around all exterior elevations of the building. • The varying color scheme proposed aids in break down the overall mass of the building. Additional consideration should be given to the proposed palette of colors to deepen the colors and focus on slightly darker color tones. • The reduction in mass (stepping down) and changes in architecture on the west end of the building are positive changes. Additional stepping down of the mass and architectural improvements should be considered for the east end of the building to ensure a more gradual transition at the property line. • The articulation added to the roof ridge line is significant and a very positive improvement to the overall design of the building. • The use of plywood siding is prohibited by the Town's adopted design guidelines. Please amend the plan and proposed an approvable exterior siding material. • The architecture and design scheme whereby the exterior begins to illustrate a series of building is a positive change. Additional consideration should be given to the number of different building materials used and how they are arranged and ordered on the building. The One Willow Bridge building in Vail Village is an excellent example of the number of materials that should be used and how to arrange the materials on the building. � Please consider ways to further vary the window fenestration on the building. Additional variation will significantly aid in breaking down the mass of the building. • Please prepare a snow shedding plan which illustrates areas of snow shedding from the roof. The purpose of the plan shall be to demonstrate that snow is not allowed to shed down on building entrances and exits, walkways, parking areas, etc. • The front (south) elevation of the building needs additional landscape buffering. Please consider opportunities to add more landscaping in this area (ie, eliminate/relocate parallel parking spaces, reduce the amount of asphalt/drive aisle width, shift the western portion of the building to the north, combine the bike/ped path with the drive aisle, etc) • Please carefully consider the proposed site grading and the negative visual impacts it may create. As proposed opportunities exist to improve the site plan and grading plan which may result in more useable outdoor space. • A digital 3-D model will be required to aid in the review of the application. Town of Vail Fire Department Initial Comments • The Fire Department understands that the residential portion of the building will be Type 3A construction and the multi-level parking structure will be Type 1A construction. • Please submit a complete Life/Safety Report, prepared in accordance with the 2009 IBC requirements, for review and approval 22 .,,,,� �� . Please submit a complete Emergency Management Report for review and approval. . Type 1A fire protection (sprinkler system) shall be required in the construction of the garage. • Please indicate the location of the fire/emergency vehicle staging areas on the proposed site plan. • Please indicate the location of the Fire Department Control Room on the site plan and architectural floor plans. . Please submit the conclusions of a fire hydrant flow test. It will need to be demonstrated that adequate flows can be provided to protect the structure in the event of a fire. A Single Family Equivalent (SFE) shall be used to determine adequacy of flows. • Please plan to submit a set of construction drawings to the Northwest Cotorado Council of Governments (NWCOG) for plan review and elevator inspection requirements. • The use of wood trim materials is permissible on the exterior of the building. The wooden elements should be considered for accent and detail only and chains of combustible fuels shall be avoided. • A Public Safety Radio Amplification System shall be required in the building to ensure adequate radio receiving and transmitting capabilities. • Please consult with Excel Energy and Holy Cross Public Utility to verify acceptable locations for the gas meters and electric transformers. . The recently adopted 2009 IBC shall be applied to the plan review and construction of the building. Town of Vail Public Works and Transportation Department Initial Comments • In order to improve site grading and vehicle access to the site, please explore options for combining the pedestrian/bike path with the vehicle drive aisle/fire lane. . Transit stop improvements are required to permit reductions in the minimum parking requirement. The transit improvements shall accommodate a minimum of 4 ToV/ECO buses. The transit improvements should be centrally located on the site to provide the greatest accessibility to all guest and residents of the building. . Deep, underground utilities should be placed along the south side of the project and underneath the drive aisle/fire lane improvements to provide easy of access to the utility companies in the future. • Please indicate the accurate grading of the retaining wall proposed along the south and north property lines. • A meeting should be scheduled between Tom Kassmel and Glenn Palmer to discuss and review options for the various on-site and off-site transit improvements. . Please refer to the attached memorandum for additional comments. Town of Vail Communitv Development Department Initial Comments Please submit complete development review and design review applications pursuant to the submittal requirements described in detail on the application forms and as previously discussed. To remain on schedule, the complete applications shall be submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development by no later than January 4, 2010. Please submit an Environmental Impact Report as required by Chapter 12-12 of the Vail Town Code. Please submit a complete Geologic Hazard Report as required by Chapter 12-21 of the Vail Town Code. 23 • Please explore options to eliminate or significantly reduce the amount of surface parking along the south side of the building. In doing so, additional landscape and snow storage areas will be created. • Please explore options of the stepping the west end of the building back (15' to 20') to accommodate additionaf landscape areas and further break up the 800-foot long linear fa�ade of the building. • Please explore options for retaining the slope on the north side of the property to maximize the use and efficiency of the site. This may include creating two, 10-foot tall retaining walls. Should you have any questions with regard to the information out�ined in this letter please do not hesitate to call. You can reach me most easily by telephone at (970) 376-2675. Sincerely, George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail I� U 24 � . � �� }� i�;�► . Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Eikhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 970-479-2158 Fax: 970-479-2166 www.vailgov.com MEMO To: George Ruther, Community Development Department From: Public Works Re: Conceptual Review of Timber Ridge Redevelopment Date: 12/04/09 The Town of Vail Public Works Department received a conceptual Timber Ridge Redevelopment plan this past summer. Based on our review of these very preliminary plans and discussions that have occurred over the past several months the following are our comments. Additional comments will be provided when more detailed plans are provided. We have not yet been provided with updated plans since the plan submitted this past summer. Comments: 1. The plan provided was inadequate for a thorough review due to scale, limited grading, limited information. These comments reflect an overview and in no way are an engineering review of the development Plan. 2. CDOT and the Town will require a traffic study for the entire site looked at as a whole, not just phase I. The site will need to be analyzed for the interim and ultimate configuration. A pedestrian/ transit study is recommended this winter during peak season to determine existing transit usage. This will be helpful when taking any type of transit reduction for the site. 3. The project will have to meet the requirements of the CDOT access code. Based on a preliminary review this will require left turn lanes at the entry points, and possibly a right turn lane, specifically to accommodate transit. The Town will require at a minimum that the road improvements are constructed the entire length of the development site, including 12' thru lanes, 16' left turn lane, and 6' paved shoulders. If this widening is required to push to the north, due to concerns of encroachment into I-70, this will require an additional leveling course to shift the crown of the road north. If there can be a minimal widening to the south, this may be avoided. In either case the widening will require an asphalt overlay. 4. The existing bike path straddles the property line and is impacted by this development. The bike path will need to be reconstructed as a 6" thick 10' wide concrete bike path. Adequate snow storage and buffers from the proposed parking area will be required. � 5. There may be an opportunity soften the frontage by eliminating the linear drive lane and parking on the site and replacing it with a combined �20' walk/bike path/fire lane, leaving 20'-30' of landscape area on both sides of it. 6. A secondary access should be looked at for this large of a parking garage. A secondary access could be made to the north along Lions Ridge Loop. This could also function as a pedestrian connection to Lions Ridge Loop which could also access the Town's transit system with a bus stop along Lions Ridge Loop. 7. With the widening of the road to the north and the shifting of the bike path to the south, the existing ditch will be impacted and will most likely have to be piped to accommodate the widening and mitigate potential safety issues. This also may cause the bike path to be required to be attached to the road, therefore requiring curb and gutter the length of the improvements. 8. The density increase at this site will cause an increase in transit usage. A new improved bus stop that easily accommodates 4 buses at a time will be necessary. The opportunity to make use of the existing bus stop area, the office building and the south western portion of the proposed site, could create a well functioning transit stop close to the proposed office/community center. 9. We would like to see the ultimate master plan, this will allow the town and the developer to better understand the relationship of cross access requirements, grading issues, site circulation during construction, during an interim phase and the ultimate development for pedestrians, vehicles, deliveries and trash, fire access, landscaping and usable open spaces, lighting, snow removal and storage and their impacts on landscape areas, utility connections and transit service. The master plan also allows all to better predict future traffic projections to determine the CDOT requirements. As well as the impacts to all town services as well as to the community as a whole. 10. The improvements within the 30 foot utility easement may cause relocation or reburying utility lines to maintain adequate cover requirements. No trees may be planted over utilities included storm sewer. 11. All access, parking , driveways, loading zones, building setbacks to drive aisles etc. will need to meet the Town of Vail Development standards. 12. Snow storage for all surface lots will be required on-site (30% of impervious area) 13. The development will require a pubic art component. 14. The development must adequately treat all run off from the site. Parking garage and surface lots will require treatment thru a water quality facility/structure. 15. A hazard report will be required to be completed. 16. The development would require compliance with the town's most current impact fees in place. 17. The development must meet all construction staging and construction parking requirements. 18. The plans should be reviewed by a Code consultant and the Fire and Building Department to ensure all assumptions regarding Code and Life Safety will be accepted by the Fire Marshall and Chief Building Official. 26 � � i 1 i Attachment D: Public Notice THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning �nd Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail wiii hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on December 14, 2009, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a final review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, to allow for the redevetopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published November 23, 2009, in the Vail Daily. ��. 27 � � � ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE S UR VEY LOTS 1 THROUGH S, A RESUBDIVISION OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION BLOCK C A PART OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. TOWN OF VAIL., EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO wmhwas cEannca� o� SiEwnai irtlEpcWRnN;r co u.rc 5 TMnRi i�nE o vu4 us. &wX w.nOwl 0.SSOGrnnau, M PCrt AuD aS 1RU5iEE, E TO Oi vNL iIMBER iDGE .LL'FORMB�F HOVSINC CARGOFAPOIJ� iHiS 5 i0 CFRLIFY TINT T15 M AND T�E SUHKY Orv YMiCH R �5 eiSm WERE wDE iN COR�N�CE WItM '4iNIMVU Siu�On 0 pEIN� REO�IREMFMS NR eLTq/nCSU I.W� lli JOiMLV ESfnBt15HE0 oei� nDOPRA BY e�TA. ACSU 0.VD NSM IN i999. PND INLWD6 IiFN5�1,Y2, a, OF Tn&E A F�QEEOF. WRSUnNT i0 iNE PCCUWFV SinN�RDS n5 eDO� � 9T� � Nh�N5C5.�NN�PLSU arvD iN E iHE OAiE O iNiS CERiiMnTIOHo UNOERSiMED f�CfAE f1F5 iw�i ROPEF F �aROCEDUaFS, COMV�FEANTnTION MI ADEOUAiE SUTEV PERSONNEL E MPLOY D iN OROEa lO Cn�E�E ftE5uL15 PA BLE i0 iHOSE OUit1Nm CONiRJLMUNO BOIMOhRI ��CEE a��MSUftEDRnOiInEVE��GOR SVRVEY ✓FAS�FEUENIS WniCH ��a�� `QJ t V� �QW J�'S y �r � �5 , \ i ,7� . ♦ SaN�EL H. ECKEH COtDRODO P.LS. No. 3009i avo oN BfiwF oG J CARE Me�GE SUfNEYING Llt ��j LOT 2 � o �oMm.> �\� � u u �32911'-W rza N p �\ (v[c w ra�sril � n \� nE(TMUr) K �.��i aw�:"� � ❑ LOT i ty�xm n) / �o \ �� / �� ~J� \ M / d / k� a.t ��i"°N � i ��e� e . � j2.Se� w � PARCEL 8 �+sy`'', \ � 5 UON'S RIOGE SUBDINSION �i' � FluNC No. z •+ a_ (REC. Na. 12/219) � o0 � / RADN15 � 1]71.95' DELTA � 11'S4'12' MC = 368.1]' T/J!(�NT = IB�.72' d10RD = J67.K' BRG � N5J75'00'E '• �, � _.a `� / ]1.95' c cw DEL�ins- 9R � r °.�- ss3.eo59 � SAVOY VILLAS �, _ ,.�.z< cH D= Rs1�s' od CONDOMINIUMS BRG = 5]R2'55'E 1 � 537V9'31'E - 233�ZB�i A \;as��p,�ei�.,,) I L T 5 \ aJ •'�� co .,) ._ zi/ ,,�°° �`� e \� �r� �/�. 10 � F vom / / r LO 3 \ E �*ES� �° ^) - �(j 1�G tt D6CRIPIION: O / �9}� LO1S��R ♦ ANO s A'ESUNOrvSiON oF tION'S RIOCE S�UBWOMYSON, BIDCN C. aGCOftDiNG To iHE g� i NO R�OFDE� �UNE 8. 19 I BOO��]]9 n� G�GE 458. Of fAGIE. STniE Of COLO�+AOo 1 �G Sgti� �R� GHi� iIR£ PNO INiERESi TOF��EMEM IN TIE fOLLAx1NG DESLRIBF� PItOPEHiI'. u� � ROPFRIY DESCRiBFD M aN MEM USEMEM AGREEMENL Gil£� FOR RECORO .wH . N BOOK �9 ORE PMTCUTARtY p6CRIBE➢ AS GOLLOWS: e R6UBOrviSpN OI BLOCK C, UON'S RIOGE SUBDIVISqN. EeLIE LOUNIT, COLOR.�00. A /�C � SuB DE� iHEUOf'i10E OF iHE FwCLE COVNIY. COLOM00 C�E2K eN0 RECOPOER: 1� sao v� �aac �vn c urs�r oesc ws rou.ows� $ A�PqM ON lHE W6iERLT ll YJ� LOT 6 wHENCE iHF SOl1iHW6i COftHEw OG Sa LOi 6�BUft5 5 3� �EGREES 09']1' E aO.SeEFEET; 1MfNCE N 3> DEGREES OB W Ou SNO w 01 �£Ef: iNEt�CE OEPNlIiNG SW WESRRLY LiNE rv ].25 RtT: iHEt�CET u�48 DEGPEES 36']9' E 53.16 fEEt: iHENCE 5 al OECREES 2}'��CµEFi9p'fFFTETHENCE S�e �EGRfES 36 9 E 4]BO FEEf' THFNCE S 41 DEGftEES 1]'3t' W 2380 RE( TO iHE POINi OF ��'o. eECixNiHC. � ' � ,�� p'�l �ica�cooRwo L� z) on.E a urn/�csa �wo rmc swrvf.: s/s/zco�. e i��, /\� .10 a0� }� BFwRiNGS 4.� UPON LNE UNE COf1NEC11NG 1HE Aro IHIENTS AS �fSCRIBED NEREON MM iHE � CJ o' y�('. lR�x�ESIERIY At�O NOFMWFSiERLT CORNfltS OF SNO LO 1 5�10 BGRMG BEING N]T09'31'wG a��` �) NOiiCE aLCORWNG TO fAtDRP00 IAW TOU 4US7 COM4ENCF Nf� LEGLL ACTiON BISED UPOrv MT /s°.a w� y� o�sc �iN TMrs sumEr wnwx TMa� vcws errtR rou vi oiscv.Ea suen oErECr. w uo rvcNr, �,�P�S �ROU,�TMC onrz � cmnncsrroHrsoc�ccrXC�acoxs wmrt RaE cwr.a+cm uaaE rww *cr� rEUs S�P�M�4� \ 5) 1HE BOUNDARr DiuEN5qN5. EASEMENIS PN� RIGHR 0� waT SHOxN NEREON NtE PEA lHE RECORO PIAi GIXt TME SU&IECi P oPERN INO mLE SEWCM GER�ORNEO Bl SfEWPRi TiIE 0� FAG�£ G NiY � OROER No. O.SOJ3t]3. M BftIMItY 25, 2003. 6) THE SUa ELT PROPFAtt IMY BE ENCUUeERED ev AN IIN�ERGROUNO RICHT-0E-WAT ElSEMENT �� GRan'1£U i ROSS E1£CIRIC n550CL4ilON, INC. PECOROE� SEPIFMBER 12, u9>e. IH BWK 390 aT oao ooc e+r rs wiccra� nr�o ww� * uanir�r oErosrtco *� _ onr ov _ __ zo_, nr _ �ma _ or ME FP4l£ CO SUH+£Y PIA15/RiGHS-Oi-wnY SUft �AGE _, RECFP110N NUMBER__ c%�ssi as RccEVnoN Ho. iensi. TMHEnEON uu .. oe TMc inrarror+ r TMc ru[ueur . )J T1E SUB.�ECi PROPEFT' ENCUMBEF R 0�' ul U��FGit0UN0 RIGM-O�-wAT EASENTNp G2wiED 10 HO�Y CRO55 El£C1FiC /SSOCNiroN. MC. �ECIXNEO ER t980, IN B�OK ]11 ♦ nGE 3i� AS RiCEPiiON Na�Z0�598. E OESIXtiFliOU F THE EM1SfMFNT IS R� lEN NOi IoE SIRIP � MG TNE U E��INFS BUrziED MID 5 i SUFFICIFMLT pIME Ip1ED TO sGCURAiELx OEPYT 1HE L ON Oi iH E NI HEREON. e) rxc crrtiac nuern Riocc vu+cri (iors i niaoucH s) - io.oaz acRCs 9) FACH BUILDiNG WS ME MOR65 OF 1280 M. FROMNGE RWD xti5f. t �0) THERE ME n 10iAL OF 251 PMNiNG P4L6 IXI THE EMIRE 91E. F 11�W PND SEWQt 11N6 SNOwx HEFEOH WEFE NOT I�OCAIED B} CORE RANGF SUflvEYINGOLLC. � O%�M41E LOG110u5 SNOWN wERE PfVONOm HY THE t£ RrvER WAIER PNO SnNiiaiiql IS1ItICi. tB2�Ew5 H qi IRE GQt 1NE VIAT OF A R6UBOMSiON OG llONS FIOGE SqWMSroN N T�is ��vNl. COUVtt OF UG N STMETE� � o HPDO. FER TNE PtAi 1HQtE0� E�CORO[� GRAPHiC SCALE � B �9>3 Ai RECCVPOU xo. zvos i ME cec� couNtt C�Rx u,D ECOROCR. uN�css'mauico aTMCRwisE- sN/�� "w i'aT 1 x SE _ i i% . /�%/G�o9 �;�,b�u �d�� m ! � G� - �_ ! I C..� �` `�i � c1C , `m �j �• visc u� t�i�viE.v �cF.SS � Z ; ; }�l4�..�5 ��'R 'DR 8 3 ' �' �Rtitsv � �%�S� cx� 8 : oo"=' K. Z: �pp-� l �� oq w� Fi� �Zl�l � 325 - Zl8Z �l. '•�� E..t u�-ri o�,�, w, ��'�� -�. i cra-� �=.-rvk+ 1 -- ' S i�:. C � RCu l v�ri o�J _ • Si �. c�Rr�r�� t� � I I ___-- - -- ._ __ —:_ _ _.-- -_- --- - .---�-�-- _ - -- - - --- - - -___ _ _ _ _ � _�_� _ �___ __w ��_=-__ _ __ _ __ _ _ ----_= �, - --- ---- _ � � 3� � --�. I•I,oucw��, � ZO/� %CO. —b.. �ipc�;! ! , ZOtO 3i�q. ��:R�-nI�- --v `yYl�ech l, ZD�D SId�. ��R�v �- ,��1. _� .. 1� Z�� Z i�t o9 ` Z '� � Id �IZ�lb�o� �Cc. � orzu.� :x; 0�1 �CC �lou�.s��`a1 11 �/S� �� v.loa.ILsE�'o�! .. Sc,�:�n ��-� 0�1 ✓�.t U� �(� � .. �"C.C. ��t✓� Zl `�l /C� . . -�$ � �►�._. �� le�r �o � �l � a105 z: 30�'''' -r_.� 0 0 �, -�S2 1--�outsi Z o•.+�. � t�.�'�2i�.T' � ._�.�.Y� 10` zb �° �'f� �2.3' (�a�� L� �� li�i O Z � i fZC u � �-�-E. ��--1 �-�,�. sj �C � : II --�;'', �� y ��S ' �f t: �'�5 ��4a.��Do�.tT"� � � • .�. • ' 'DR�, a • . 'i'' Rr�! t�-}c. M -- `_ �- . � �l:l..�� . . . • 'To�u 5rv�-�' � 0 ��:�__._Y.��..� �.J.._ �__ _- �- - ' —� �-�.�� . __ C ' co�.�;,,��..� ��.�1 R,�d�� ;��. - -�.�. �-� . . ��w��:.�� . .;� . II • . �'��..«,•� ��,p. • L�'�� s. �, 1 „ .. . . � . � � � � . a � � �� ;, . . ��.�.�. --m � �, .�-� � � � .t � ; :� . . , --�:��.,t5�2�: C�ow� I;.� .� �'o.��,! Coo�s ;r -� P l �� ,o1Z--� . _ __�_W. --� �'o z u�-r M�ri . C � � = , �.t�.1 , �o `� • — --�� .._�F_ --. ;. . . . _ . � . . �.� �. _ ; , 1 �.�2�` , . �.� u �2 5�-►eucJu R� . . . �'� • - 3`�� L..�u� � , ts.-��►�-�� - � '' �R1�� ,..�►rz�,-►��T' (, 1 •71 u�� -��5�� —� T'ur�.s�O�z.r✓��-; o J i��s �� ,� � --�: , �rl�I�� • �b►Gy,e,l,� � c�rc.� --� S�+o.cJ `�Y�GL �.- " 5%t �. c��.i•�s 3a�s S�s ., � �.�� --� s� �. cm��.. �� -�. , � .u. � ��u��-► oL.t . . �,� � C� ubl-��. , . � t-� `�i _ �� _ � � � �. ,, � ❑.. �. l:7 ; 9 �� --mop�-. S S� ---mo�-- , 3--v v� � �.t�t i Roui�ri ��:c ��-- Zr►�1,�4c�' ��oat C-�.�o�� r`L l-� r+z.v�r� ��.�z-r s�.,�1 ��, = �� s� s �. . . 5 r%}�. I.v�t�.4 �� j rl�-o � r� c�r- i�u � t+c1►' �ce� 0 _ _. � �. . . . . • . . . ' . • . . .-. ... . . �. . . . cou�xr ` .._ _....._ . : �( �i� x �l. = 3�b �� 5-!0 . 1 2. 5 �..ldu1. 5 Ylc'G�T,� i� ..- . Co �..►.i�i � uv c.t5 l��f l�`ot:� ` c= r4�s.�- �. ►'c.� �"�� .Cou�s�-�e u.c.ri oLl � ; ; ��i+�2 �.� C-t v+�z.v�.�� `��,E.�oPr�n.�a._.�r � o t-t�. �.�.ri �. �,� 1�1c�.�.�.. u� IC �+G1� o�-�-1�� oti.�.rv�ct � i Zc�v}o. y-�1�� .o� C..-,,�zv�` �.lv�_ ( �R�e� ' ' '�nr+rL� c�c�`�s . i/1� �t �1 .,�.� : 1.,%: , .n..a �.� ��'a. '��t � �� - 4 -1 - - - ; �i CZ� I�C.,C. �� kta �� -�i �► Z`� C�t c..�5'6' I�u4�+2iGi u� 3�c�S . � � O �e �..� � � .�"� I�GLYY1 i �GZy �J�►so►.a.v�►-�.. , j 5 �Z � q`� � � �j � � = �'�--C u.�!'c..s- l I� � � i� � /l i8�� -- L� Tl-�, o �r`v�s . � .' �f-? '�=�C,T �16�2uic�► 1� �o�s t��.�s�.rsi �l � �� Jr.Y1E��=t � = ~ "DC..Sic`J. G�ui'bc'�.�L1t;.S. F�t:�b 11 �� B i-��v�-� _ ��.i� �}" �r�e. 4��'u✓k�. � t�, +-"'�� . �o-r-tic� �� `R�t. �b�'' `GRS Co�.c.��n,�vt� �� 6� �' TC. u �o✓a-�t'. iv+-�.1. �6rn t �+� / �i �� . . /�,�-�, � � ��.c �..�or�Ks�.-�5� o�l '%x�. 3O, �S'• � � . T.�= �C 3a�° I�r �.i�sE,n 1-'.v1-�1 �1..�la�-n 1 i�ra-�. '' �'Rc� �'i r4�S��-� (,r��rrC t� —r� (�,�'�c.JS i� —�7i ; __ 5 ��t. �a-o� t��-r-�-,`u �u. �.t►�. 1 oa �'1�,.l.l�� _ `� `-`'� `� �C� � i�� l,c�. � vrtra '-R� u�l� f` � i � l.�.It7�Sc..�4-��Ls� � �G'RG�U.I��..l� t � � FaRvY,.✓�-�; o�...l Z � �J ' � �Di �'� � �'�-- ��'lol.�c.=�-- ; l��::TV� ► �-.l i u.c� �.�.l.V�,_.`., Vi'1 t� �= tz � ` �k�-- z � l Z� 1'� i��" � v.lot�I�Lsc.�s►'o�.l �-� �Z<<s �s t2%�b o� {��. �zl �o Co �� l�--�-c. �6,�-�j � �.v�ICs`.s�sio�.l ��ZS �i 32�t�► -� . 1��.'ila►-i u i w. �l 6l� z � � ( �.��. 1-�Ray � 3�U� ��oo �,c �6 � l Sz.� � �r �iu� �c��E� Z O `T]i✓-�u�. C-�o1�.1 — --� s�,c�..l� 51�r+r��. ��..cv-�l�st 5 � -� 5�; � oF (_�cx�5 1� �`dc��: C�e� -� l��..�� uu� �rekr� c�,�� Z � � z � � � ac= -l-�►E �; ld � �. . Lr.�osc��"c� ; S��tti:. �IiSv� � i�� .►�s� �� l �� . . �1��iu� �rnc�� .a.-i�S o� L.�+c.�.��iu.cl : hc-.►�h-r ,��.,.►-r l_��us ►��d.�� P. ; � ou,n�� oE � l�u � I� � � � , ; �� L��m � : -� L.o� • �z �r, ✓-�-��E � 0�..�5t � �s �C7`c,.t�l 'S ! � �R14S�uGIZ.t�t% . ii /A' � �Z1��/I, .. _- f ; ` OLi'� � _..11.. .. � . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 0 � i �� iL.RGE. . � -bu i I� � `�'�'l�� 4t�. . : --�.-� . � u�.b�-�t `iJ�sic��..� �'o�5c� I �r�-uT' -- /1G�' 1�1. --� � � rn�.:+ �-r� `RE.�,c�` �i�a.1 m✓�y b� � � wnucan . (_.10+�1-��r_a C�u ► r.x �v�..«s . -� Fi�4�� r�Ro►�,r-5. �"'� �-�1 �l�.u��-►'0�.1. - 1�4v.�t� �1t�=1.� � --� bo, � � � y�S� COuS � ��'O - �o i5 -N�,v+�- � Co�t�uc�- c�ov�- . --� 51 � S�.�a,2 ✓�-�-�. � . �Yl tcl��. �;uRZ --� �� is �"rRic�hi-�i r�. � V�cca�:►-,� ��sh �a�= c�' hou5�� z�u� ��S{'�.L Gt' � � i ��`.. �orr, �,�..,.�.�,-t-. �JIA-�eV-�h --� � �� .�u`� I'�C.1 i :-�' oF' -i�'k..: ��t' � V+►2.t� . -�► � �su✓-�41� -�=.w�a�-5� = l�i-ic�,c��4Tio� . -�• __ � "(i'Y11��1 ` Lli .�1 mc= vr�l�c�e5. , � \ J � r v � ('i '. , lZ��'� f O9 `y1'Iv�2Y � � l-�►'cJL i�. , W v� � i�6¢ �-i ��-� r� � �-z..�R�u� -�, _ �� : � 1 7��b�e ��.. fitS -_ _- 35Z u �; !� . .� ', s7o �i ��ow.s . i� ►s �ubl��c. �o�uc. r��s �I-� � r4►2c �4r�Tieul��. y �; --��'o.�.�,� c�u��, � . _ ____ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ ___ _ _ __ � GEOLOGIC SiTE ASSESSMENT , : AND � PRELIMINARY ROCKFALL RISK AND M�TYG�TION STUDY VAIL TIMBER RIDGE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1280 NORTH FRONTAG�ROAD�WEST <''` VATL, COLO , ,R�iDO �' �� ;., � 31UB 'ARED FOR: AIL TIMBER RIDGE, LLC TTN: ARTHUR MORTON T BAYAUD AVENUE, SUITE 1016 :NVER, COLORAD� 80209 � .� TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY -- ........................................................................ 1'ROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. - 1 - SITECONDITTONS ................................................................................................... - 2 - REGTONALGE�LOGIC SETTING ......................................... .1::- ...................... - 3 - �� 3 PROJECTSITE GEOLOGY ......................................... ............................ - FORMATION ROCK .............................................. !':�!.�....:- �'� ....................... - 4 - SURFICIAL SOILS DEPOSITS ........................ :- . ` .......: ' :.. ................... - 4 - Glacial Moraines and Tills .........................�� .: �......... .. ` ...::........ - 4 - Colluvium.......................................... ...... ...... � . ��,; . 5 '^ '' ` �� ` � � ''� t �! ..... - 5 GEOLOGrC SITE ASSESSMENT ...................... . .... , .............. ..... - ROCKFALL........................................................�:� ��'� ....................................... - 5 - �''� ti CONSTRUCTION RELATED SL`(OPE INSTABILIT�'' �;., .................:................... - 6- t EARTHQUAKE CONSiDER.ATION� � �: � ............................ - 6 - � ,� 4 . . � � ; � YF �7 � � ............................... � / ' ROCKFALL MITIGATION OPTIONS :', � �� -; ,� ROCKFALL SIMUL��',�ON MODELII�G,�..✓'� �� Rockfall Block Size . ............ � 1 . ............ �''� ....................................... - 7 - �:; �� j t� ..................................-8 Model CalibratYOn� ... .............. ; . ............... - , 5 Conceptual D'esigr��,ockfa11ZDynamics � `�� `� DISSCUSSZON OF MIT�G�'�IONrO�TIO,NS� ...................................................... - 8 - Opti� `i '�SE�Bame`r ;� � � . ... ....': ..� ............................................................ - 9 - Optlon 1: W�re:Ro�e Net�Bar�rxer ................................................................... - 9- ,O�p�� v .� ,> on 2: W�re Rope� Net Barriex `� - 9- `� Option..3: Wire Rope �Tet Barrier ..................................................................... - 10 Option.4: ,�utcrop Staliilization ......................................................................... - 10 - LIMITATIONS` . � � ......................................................................:............. 10 - •J;;. REFERENCES..... ,� .............................................................................................. - 12 FIGURE 1— PROJECT SITE LOCATION FTGURE 2— GEOLOGICALLY YOUNG FAULTS AND HISTORIC EARTHQUADES FIGURE 3— REGIOAL GEOLOGY MAP FIGURE 4— PROJECT AREA GEOLOGY MAP � � FIGURE 5- GEOL�GY SECTION 1 FIGURE 6- GEOLOGY SECTION 2 FIGURE 7- GEOLOGY SECTION 3 FIGURE 8- GEOLOGY SECTI4N 4 FIGURE 9- CONCEPTUAL ROCKFALL MITTGATION OPTIONS �^��> FIGURE 10 - CRSP CALIBRATION PROFILE 3 �� "�" 1 �l,� ti, �., FIGURE I 1- CRSP CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PROFILE:r1 `�� °�.,� �:;, ; �;;�.. �•a; FIGURE 12 - CRSP CONCEPTUAL DESIGN P� FILfi 2 � e.. FIGURE 13 - CRSP CONCEPTUAL DESIC�N PROFILE 3 `� �, �'>... TABLE 1-- SUMMARY OF CRSP ANALYSIS AT`9Q;P�RCENT PROBABILITY LEVEL��,'°>.>_ ✓°�<;`''..�,, TABLE 2- SUMMARY OF CRSP AN PROBABILIT�I'�LEVEL TABLE 3- CONCEPTUAL 1v1I'��GTION DESIGN INFORMATION AT 90 PERCENT PROBrABTL��Y LE;VEL �,,''� TA: ]ob No.109 310B GN INFORMATION AT 98 PERCENT GecPtech �f✓ C� Z` ti/ � l� PTJRPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report pzesents the findings of geologic si#e assessment and preliminary rockfall risk and mitigation study for the Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project at 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado. The project site location is shown on Figure 1. The propose of our study y�r�SS to assess the geologic conditions that could impact t�c proposed redevelopmenC.'..and to assess the . . � �.; .:;;: � rockfall risk and possible mitigation methods for the proposed redevelopment area only. Our study was performed according to our revised N Timber Ridge, LLC. � ,,. - A field reconnaissance of the project site was�nade on N geologic conditions and to callect field informatiori`o�i''th `�;;;':... conditions. In addition, we have reviewed published g o aerial photographs and reviewed inforriiatiori;-in;,our p 4 �� ti� '•, ` study for the redevelopment project {Hep�!arth Eaw�� this information, an assess�.ueiit ;of the pote �t�a�g olo �-ecrxl propo�ed r� G �t : mitigations were evaluat± were restncied;_�o the zed �,.+ � ':ay buildmgs �to the west``fhat , �� ti : ..� Program (.CRSP Version summarizes f�ie;�informat presents our findiiigs._. proposal to Vail ber 11, 2009`tb:observe the logy and rock�f 1 information, looked at ical engmeermg 2009). Based on to the ' �;:>: was made. Also, the rockfall risk and possible �,,:., .� osed red'evelo�ment area. The rockfall evaluations pment area-an,d�do not include the existing apartment notbe,redeveloped. The Colorado Rockfall Simulation was use�to assist in our rockfall evaluations. This repart by this study, describes our evaluations and PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed redevelopment project covers about 5.2 acres in the eastern part of the existing 10.1 acre apartment complex as shown on Figure 4. The existing apartment complex includes seventeen, two and three story, wood frame apartment buildings. Eight of the existing buildings in the proposed redevelopment area will be razed and a five story apartment building will be constructed in their place. The proposed five story Job No.109 310B Gec��bech _z_ building will cover about 2.2 acres and the central part of the building will be a parking garage with apartment buildings to the west and east. Ground floor elevations in the western part ofthe proposed building will be at 8,100 and �10 feet with the building stepping down to the south. Ground floor elevations in the central garage area will be at 8,100 feet and ground floor elevations in the eastern part of the building will be at 8,105 and 8,115 feet with the building stepping down io the south. Relatively deep cuts and zetaining walls will be needed for the proposed five story building'a�ong its north side as shown on Figures 5, 6 and 7. SITE The existing 10.1 acre apartment complex is Gore Creek valley as shown on Figure 1. In frontage roads border the property on,t `�;.; property on the northwest. The grouni the southeastern part of the property is transition to a very steep ,�';: through 8. Slopes oz��e ��' ��: outcrops that are potentii hillside, see,Figure,�4. L: �,, ,`,:;_ �';�,:, northwes,'f/of the propert� abouf ':':7�'='(horizontal to in the for southeast I�c 4 r ;- t::� in Vail,o*n the nort] ff:\'\ �,ighwa�` 70 and its of the and south 's Ridge Loop borders the Pace slope on tiie Goxe Creek valley floor in ,>; _ �`` � ;r� ly level These nearly level slopes abruptly � � ��`� V,�j�� h�,��m p�rt, f�he property, see Figures 5 f' ;, ��:�:� �� eri;60 and 80 percent. Prominent sandstone �ckfall, "'re located near the upper part of the � f,�'' ►as;been cut into the steep hillside just to the cut slopes along the northwest side ofthe road are x�an� �e from about 6 to 40 feet high. The road err�bankment�fills along the southeast side of the Lion's Ridge Loop on the property are a;; ° � � �� f ; ;;� typically abouf�l 75,:1(hor �ontal to vertical) and 20 to 30 feet high. Retaining walls from `�, i 3 to 17 feet high have lie n constructed along the toe of the road embankment fill to make �:� room for the existing'apartment buildings. Several existing residential buildings are located along the ridge line that forrns the top of the hill to the northwest of the existing apartment complex. The Vail Post Office is located on the adjacent property to the southwest and the Savoy Villas Condominiums are located on the adjacent property to the northeast. � Job No.109 310B C�tECh -3- REGIONALGEOLOGIC SETTING Vail and the project site are located in the Southern Rocky Mountains about 10 miles to the wes� of the Rio Grande rift, see Figure 2. The regional geology is shown on Figure 3. The Rio Grande rift is a relatively young extensional geologic and geomorphic structure that started to develop about 29 million years ago. The rift generally coincides with the north-trending Blue River valley which is a half-graben on the east side ofthe Gore Range. Vail is underlain by a thick section of Paleozoic-age sed'unentary rocks (Pz) that lie between the Gore Range to the east and the Sawatch Precambrian-age crystalline rocks (YXr) are present in � �. The Sawatch Range is a north plunging, anticlinal up:l�fl �% Laramide orogeny about 40 to 80 million years�ago. � The geologically young Rio Grande rift is have been active in post-glacial time,`�abo,� closest post-glacial fault to the project si�f ;. Mountains fault, fault Q50 on Figure 2. I1 project site. At this dista'nce; a<l,arge eartL �> .,::,:-;., � the past 15, section of the Williariis�Fork 1Vlountain fault the project site that is Survey 20�2rl�ationa in the the southwest. d.,Sawatch Ranges. �nei1''durine the young fauits some ofwhich ;years, see Figure 2. The ction of the Williams Fork to the northeast of the of M6.5 on the northern not produce strong ground shaking at ig shown on the U. S. Geological {Frankel and Others, 2002). SITE GEOLOGY The main geo`logic features`iri the project vicinity are shown on Figure 4 and the inferred � �/ subsurface geologic'cond,i�ions are shown on the geologic sections, Figures 5 through S. Our geology nnap an� ections are based on the regional geology map by Scott and Others (20d2} with modifications based on our field observations and subsurface information in our exploratory borings and a seismic surveys by Zange Geosciences. The exploratory boring locations and locations of the seismic lin.es are shown on Figures 4 and 9. Our geotechnical engineering xeport may be referred to far boring logs and other details of these two studies (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2009). Job No.109 3I OB ��h � -4- FORMATION ROCK The near surface formation rock at the project site is the middle Pennsylvanian—age Minturn Formation (Pm). The Minturn is an interbedded arkosic grit, sandstone, conglomerate, siltstone, shale and minor limestone and dolomite (Scott and Ofhers, 2002). The beds range from cemented an�d hard to non-cemented but firm. The bedding strikes to the northeasi and dips about 30 to 40 degrees to the northwest. On the hillside to ,r`�,. the northwest of the project site the rock is usually covered by thin-col,luvium but a s prominent outcrop band is present near the ridge crest that ,�i`ms the top of the hill, see Figure 4. This outcrop band has produced rockfall in the�-past and�roekfall blocks are ,� ; � �Y� ��.'.. common on the hillside down slope ofthe outcrop�!�' �µ � , Our field and aerial photograph measurements show:t�i, ��, :, hillside upslope of the proposed redevelopment have�`a�. h �- �. and 5.5 feet and an estimated weight between 0.1 and 1 blocks are present on the hillside above the rede,' elopn , =�� , ,. a maximum dimension between 4.8 and 7�`�/;xfeet�d'�aii 17.3 tons. Very large ri �:`� formed by a massive°sai apartment complex, see ' ,,.. � ..� < rnaximum�,;;dimensiozi:;�f y � . 1 �8� O,i1S. � � A„ . ``�'• /� ,��b. .,�',' SURFICIA��-S"bILS D3 cks are present down blocks"� n the dirnension between 1.3 A few larger rockfall larger blocks have ated weight between 2.8 and of a 70 foot high cliff upslope of theFsouthwestern part of the existing ti: id;$.:--�Th�se�ry large rockfall blocks have a 29 feet and an estimated weight between 24 and Glacial Moraines'arid;< :iIls ,� The Gore Creek valley in the project area was the site of valley glaciers during the Pleistacene. Remnants of a middle Pleistocene-age, Bull Lake lateral moraine (Qm2} is present on the lower valley side just to the southwest of the project site. The project site is underlain by a late Pleistocene-age, Pinedale terminal and ground moraine (Qml). The Pinedale glaciations occurred between about 15,000 to 35,000 years ago and Bull Lake glaciations occurred between about 132,000 to 302,000 years ago. The Pinedale till encountered in our borings was a dense to very dense deposit of gravel- to large boulder- Job No.109 310B ~Ptech -5- sized rock in a silty sand rnatrix. The rocks in the till include a variety of lithologies present in the Gore Creek drainage up stream of the project site. Collnvium Thin colluvium covers the Minturn Formation on the hillside to the northwest of the project site. Soil exposures in the Lion's Ridge Loop road cut indicated that the colluvium is a matrix supported deposit of angular rock blocks from gravel- to large �,,�;:: `.�., boulder-size in a mixed silt, sand and clay matrix. The rocks,in:-the colluviunn are exclusively from the Minturn Formation. GEOLOGIC SITE AS This study has shown that future rockfall is present a signi�cant risk to the proposed re� Other geologic conditions that should be;;co t..�W'>:: potential construction related slope instabil: These conditions, their potential risks and�d ROCKFALL Numerous rockfall which i ��, ;,:4 ',. / -..`��.. �`., l �,�' ESSMENT `t� ;':'�,, ;. : ..,� >, _ � �_.. ifrequenx but has the pot�tial to ., ,,�"�. " `'�� rrieri�;_., �� i in the red,evelopment design are �otential e � uake ground shaking. insiderat, ons are discussed below. �`;,;;::.� � e upslope of Lion's Ridge Loop 'start at the outcrop band near the ridge line have oceuzred in the past,'see Figuie'4.'�Exceptional, very large rockfall blocks are � '' !/ present on the hillside to the west of the proposed redevelopment area. It is likely that ,.. F '- past rockfalls`have extendedrdown slope of Lion's Ridge Loop and have reached �he area ,; , _�rfl of tl� ' ,' . Evzdence of past rockfall in this area has been ��v� — � �p��oved by constructio� To our kziowledge the existing apartments have not been hit by Y rockfalls Re ional rockfall studies performed in 1984 after the existing apartments were I i� � i � � , ,% � . g �onstructed show that the ap�v�ee�� is in a high severity rockfall hazard area �S ju�c5�i�ssac� 19$4 and Town of Vail, 2000). Without long-term observations it is not possible to assess the statis�ical probability of future rockfalls at the proposed redevelopment with a high level of confidence. Tt seems reasonable to infer that future rockfalls wi111ikely be infrequent. It is possible Job No.109 310B G�ecitech � that future rockfalls may not occur durinrg a reasonable exposure time for the facilities. ' 4.` However, if a rock�all were to hit the facilities it has the potential for severe building �rr'�'� damage and could harm the building occupants. If this xisk is not acceptable then rockfall Q�` � • n•`y mitigation shouId be considered. An evaluation of rockfall mitigation options for the r� f� redevelopment is presented in the Rockfall Mitigation Options section of this report. Evaluations of rockfall mitigation in the existing apartment complex not in the proposed redevelopment area is not in the scope ofthis study. ,f'';��:., CONSTRUCTION RELATED SLOPE INSTABILITY We do not expect wnusual problenns with constructio with the grading likely needed for the proposed xecl` e engineered. Geotechnical engi ..�-- — walls are presented in aur geot� Geotechnical, 2009). EARTHQUAKE CONSIDERATIONS Historic earthquakes of the;'�iroject strong with magm�ud'es,:of M 5 t5;�and less VI and less, see Figure 2 Tj?e,�ar`gest;hist 1882 about abo t to the 0.3 and a slope'iristability associated .t if the gr`a�is _...,; �roject grad�and retainin ..>,, �rt (Hepworth-Pawlak ►ave typically been rnoderately Modified Mercalli Intensities of in the project region occurred in located in the northern Front Range site and had an estimated magnitude of of VII. Historic ground shaking at the project site associated with;fhe 1882 and ihe ofher larger historic earthquakes in the ,.\ i '/ region does not appear t� ave exceeded Modifed Mercalli Intensity VI (Kirkham and Rogers, 1985). Moc�� ed Mercalli Intensity VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable exposure time for the proposed redevelopment buildings, but the probability of stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. The proposed five st�rv a�artment buildin�s should be desiened to withstand moder�,ly Gtrnng around shakin� with little or no damaee and not to collapse under stronger ground �_ - - � Job No.109 3108 C�t� � -�- sh� For firm rock sites with shear wave velocities of 2,500 fps in the upper 100 feet the U. S. Geological Survey 2002 National Seismic Hazard Map indicates that a peak ground acceleration of O.OSg has a 10% exceedence probability for a 50 year exposure time and a peak ground acceleratian of 0.15 g has a 2% exceedence probability for a 50 year exposure time at the project site (Frankel and Others, 2002). This corresponds to a statistical recurrence time of about 540 years and 2,500 years, respectively. The seismic surveys by Zonge Geosciences and reported in Hepworth-Pawla/k�G,eotechnical(2009} shaws that the upper 100 feet of the soil profile in the proposed�redevelopment area has a � �,,, � shear wave velocity of 2,300 fps and is in Class C, very d,nse soal'and soft rock sztes as described in the 2006 International Building Code �: � �'`� �. ROCKFALL We have reviewed possible options for rockfall mzt redevelopment and have identified fou.r.conceptual The four options are shown on Figure 9k�a �: stabilized earth {MSE) barrier and outcro Simulation Program (CRS�''�'version 4.0) barrier options. ;:::�:: ROCKFALL,S,INIUL. �� ='= % � CRSP V,e�sion 4 0 is � �- °, slone anc�`;:nr.edicts the kinetic ener`gy; �;>The pro �, ,�. �. ,:'��,, characteristics of.�Y�e.sla �;, . :;:� commonlyused in a�� , Rockfall Block Size �N OPTIONS ` '`�' ` ,� �ry � ;atior�for the proposedj ��`, �ptions,that can be further evaluated. � ; : *>. wire rope n� arriers, a mechanically ion., The -�olorado Rockfall to evaltiiate rockfall dynamics for the 11 cornput� program that simulates rocks tum6ling down a �al proba ility distribution of velocity, bounce height and ,�takes into account slope profile, rebound and frictional �d rotational energy of the rocks. The program is a tool and mitigation of rockfall hazards. Field measurement ofihe larger rockfall blocks upslope ofthe proposed redeveloprnent area have a maximum dimension between 4.8 and 7.7 feet and an estimated weight between 2.8 and 17.3 tons. The CRSP models developed for this study considered a Job No.l 09 310B Gec�itech : spherical rock with a diameter of 6.6 feet and a weight of 12.4 tons. These are the average values for the field measurements plus one standard deviation. Model Calibrations The surface roughness, tangential and normal coefficients used in the CRSP models were adjusted to produce rockfall stopping distances in the model that are comparable to �.,,. stopping distances observed and inferred from our field observations::; These observations � indicate that past rockfalls have stopped over the entire hillsi�up slope of Lion's Ridge ��;, . Loop and probably reached the existing apartment complex. CRSP�Profile 3 for the pre- development topography was used as a calibration p ofil�;, see Figure I O' ,Rockfall simulation analysis for this profcle indicate that�th� ax�znum runout is 4'70,:',feet� easured lr � ..,, t,:, � from the top ofthe start area. The runout extends tQ the south`o�existing Building P. ,. i� �;:;�s C Conceptual Design Rockfall DynamYCS'�:;..�Y _ Three CRSP profiles were modeled to ac ��ss ro �all dynamics�for the �ption 1, 2 and 3 rockfall barriers. The three=profiles are sho�v� F gure's;X%1, 12 and 13. Location of the profiles are shown on'P"igure 9 A summary o�the rockf la 1 dynamics from the three j s 4' models are presenfed�'on Table lY for the 90 percent�°`probability level and on Table 2 for � ' f� the 98 percer�t-probability le�'eJ�Th� 90:per�t probability level means that there is a 10 �.+,:,:_ (' percent,chance that'the'inodel values will be exceeded and the 98 percent probability that there is``a?2'-pereeri't"!'ehance that the model values will be exceeded. The CRSP modes'show that at tlie locations of the two Option 1 barriers, rockfall bounce heights are greater than bourice heights for the Options 2 and 3 barriers. The kinetic energies for the two ��0`p� n 1 barriers are lower than the kinetic energy at the Option 2 �, and 3 barriers. The kinetic energy at the Option 3 barrier is lower than the kinetic energy at the Option 2 barrier. DISSCUSSION OF MITIGATION OPTI�NS Mitigation Option 1 is either a wire rope net barrier or mechanically stabilized earth {MSE) barrier located an the property just to the south of Lion's Ridge Loop. Option 2 is a wire rope net barrier located off of the property near the top of the Lion's Ridge Loop Job No.109 31UB C�tech �!2! road cut. Option 3 is a wire rope net bamer located offofthe property near the base of the outcrop start zone. Option 4 is rock outcrop stabilization with an anchored steel mesh net. Conceptual mitigation design information that is sui#able for feasibility evaluations and preliminary cost estimates at the 90 percent probability Ievel are presented on Table 3 and for the 98 percent probability level are presented on Table 4. The barrier heights shown on the two tables are the CRSP bound height plus the rockfall block radius o f 3.3 feet. The level will owner and governmental xegula#ory a�encies. Option 1: MSE Barrier It should be possible to build the 900 MSE barrier will require a nearly level, retained barrier. Construction access could be_from the t Rockfall kinetic energy and barrier he: within the capacity of an MSE barrier. Option 1: Wire It should be possi property. Lion`-s Ridge Loop. Ro� ,:.; ;:�.. probability�Teyels are wit systems. `�,"�� .� , ..�� ; Option 2: Wire Rope'N :SE barrie,z, entirely on the;;pzoperty. The 111 bench�v'i'd'e�enough to cbnstruct the ;:� operty'oi�>from Lion's Ridge Loop. 90 and 98�pexcen,� probably levels are :�900 foot-long;;�ire rope net barrier entirely on the � - ��. ier`wxll xeq�e''a nearly level, retained fiIl bench wide `.:'C�,o.nstruction access could be from the property or from aetic`en rgy and barrier heights at the 90 and 98 percent .� capacity of commercially available wire rope net barrier et Sarrier The 990 foot-long Option 2 wire rope net barrier will require an easement on the hillside to the north of Lion's Ridge Loop. Little permanent hillside disturbance will be required for this barrier. Most construction access can probably be with a crane located on Lion's Ridge Loop. Rockfall kinetic energy and barrier heights at the 94 and 98 percent probability leveis are within the capacity of commercially available wire rope net barrier systems. Job Ho.109 310B C�c�tECh -10- Option 3: Wire Rope Net Barrier The 1,060 foot-long Option 3 wire rope net barrier will require an easement on the hillside to the north of Lion's Ridge Loop. Little permanent hillside disturbance will be required for this barrier. Construction access will be difficult requiring an access trail, highline, helicopter or a combination oithese. Rockfall kinetic energy and barrier heights /�,. at the 90 and 98 percent probability levels are within the capacit�,ofcommercially available wire rope net barrier systems. � , ;�� . .. . Option 4: Outcrop Stabilization The anchored, steel mesh ot�tcrop stabiliza hillside to the north of Lion's Ridge Loop. flexible steel mesh netting on the oL hillside disturbance will be required tion,system will �require an easem � n the � ._:. � � . Stabilizat�on w�11�1ie achieved by�pinnmg a ,: with groute��rock bolts. Little permanent '�tabilization Co��i'struction access will be difficult requiring an access trail, highline� hehcop�er�or a comtiination of these. It should � h 4' be possible to provide effective outcrop sta�ill��n wifh commercially available � '.. Y .C� t� R � � . anchored, flexible, stee mesh`�ne�fting systemsti` � t� , y'"``. 1 r i .,.. �� \ ''� � , � - , ;' � L � LI1V,I`IT� TONS � �a /��" ; � /..,��. '� �` a ��ti This study was conducEed a�ccord�ng,to�generally accepted engineering geology and � '� ;.... t, 4 ::'. A. . .. �.Y" geotecluazcal' engineermg pxiiaciples`and practices in this area, at this time. We make no warranty either,:e�Cpress or unplied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based on,,o��field observations, aerial photograph interpretations, published regional geo'logy information, numerical modeling, the proposed redevelopment described ua this report and our experience in the area. If the redevelopment differs substantially from that described in this report then revision of our information may be needed. This report has been prepared exclusively for our client to evaluate the impact ofthe geology on the proposed rcdeveloprnent. Information pertaining to rockfall mitigation is conceptual and applies only to the redevelopment and not for the existing apartment buildings outside of the Job No.109 3] OB C�tGCh -11- redevelopment area. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. Additional rockfall analvsis will be needed if rockfall mitig rnns ar . considered and after the snecific miti�ation nlan has been determined. If there are questions or if we may be of further service, please call our office. Re. ,. .. .. . . - i Ral En� An� Ste RG cc: Job No.109 310B G�r�U�t�Ch � -12- REFERENCES Frankel, A. D. and Others, 2002, Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps: U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 02-420. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2009, Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Timber Ridge Redevelopment, .1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail Colorado: Prepared for Vail Timber Ridge LLC, Denver, Colorado (Job No. 109 310A, October 27, 2009). Kirkham, R M. and Rogers, W. P., 1985, Colorado 1867 to 1985: Colorado Geological Survey ] Scott R. B. and OEhers, 2002, GeoCogy Map of the Yail Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey, Miscell n�i Version 1.0. ,��/ Interpretations Eagle County, Vlap 2369, �� Schmueser and Associates, 1984, Rocicfall Study `Toi%v� of Yd%il; Prepared fo`r t° he Town of Vail (November, 29, 1984}. ' � t Town of Vail, 2000, Official Rockfall Hazqrd Map, Town of Yailµ�repared by the Town of Vail, Vail, Colorado (Adoptec�by the Town Counei� October 17, 2000). ,'�. � <� `'. Tweto, O., 1979, Geology Map of Colorado,,�:'S. Geologi al Survey. ' , :� , Widmann B. L. andFOt�ers, 1998;;Preliminary`Quaternary Fault and Fold Map and Data Base of Colorado ;�Colorado`Geological;Survey Open File Report 98-8. Job No. ] 09 310B C-�c�tGCh m� o� �o M N m � O � d .E o v � U N O� � U Z J U Z _ U w E- O W � Y � d a � O � a. LL.! T T d � N r- d > d J � vW a� � •O 0 a� � Q d C � � a� o w �, a �o � � N � � y a ?' � c L Q °' a .o � H V 'cit o � �, R � 7 � A � tA (n tD (n fA U1 tA U1 Vl tA fA N CI C C C C C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O W i�� i � �� i� V � � � � � � � � � � � � � C7 00 000 000 00 O C e�- �-�^ � r s�- � M M lf') ln N�t Nd'M CV MC7 Y t tn .� _ �� 0 m .��' tn tA fn (n tn Vi y (� (n C� VJ fn V�-- 4--� r- r-. �-- v-. w 4.- .� 4-. w w � M M it7 t- a0 O C7 C'� 00 N f1 00 ; N N N N.- N c7 cf t+� c+') th ch a � �-NM .-NC� •-CV M t-NC� � N tv N fU N � N N N N� w 4=. "w 4= t� i� 4=. � 4= t� t� t�. iC V Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. ria`a`. aa`a a�a aa`a` Y V � N N N N Ltii i C C C C 0 0 0 0 � �G� �7 � d' 'a' �G 3. N N N CV f.� e- �- � t- � � N w � � � � � V Y (D CO CD CD � o co csi c� cD � C N m +-: L � � L`. V , W Q' m m � Cfl 0 � G � � � N � m � ° w° Z° Zo za�i � � � O � O p p.a � m ..�-. �' � Q..' � r�. W 7 � 7 � tSS � c0 in N �-" N � C `� w �i� �� i I ag'i t' a �" a N c. �''� a. o °°' �a °°- °�o U. � V OO OO OO OO'o N > N a � � � � O d � C � U � a �" 0 d rn C � L U `� r � c�o � � O � v`� llS Q �, O �1 C `' O N c � N � U - � �E c Y � C "O N C N (6 � L O m 'N �. t � U � � U � O �'�d O �U N +'3 o � � � N J � � N O z mo � N o� �� U Z y �p 0 � U z Q U Z T U w O LU � g ¢ a 2 F 0 K � � W � N � .L7 � � d > d J � .� = d� � � �O � 0. � Y � y C � � c. � o� > ao d� � � N � •� �a °' a �� E F= U 'eo O > � � � 7 � � � tA fA fp fA (A !A tA tA fA N fn N C C C C C C C C G C C C = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Y W� �� W Y� rt; � y.. Y� Y� Y+ Y� `M Y.. Y� W Y� Y� Y+ �+ O QQ QQC? OQO 000 C! Q�oOO �N'� Ocflu� N�M � r�N r-�-�- Mll7'� Md'�' X � rn � �� G� �hN � �CA M�� r-O� C~ NN r'c�c- �--rr �-c-''' 7 O m � tA N lA fD fA fA (� �!A fn (n Ul Vr-. 4-- y- �.�-. w- 4--� ti-- v-. 4-. w- �-- � OOaO� �Nd' t�-NCO � d'ln ; NNN NNN M�d' M�� NM �NM �--NM �NM � N N N N N N N� N � N N �ii F�+ cti, 4=. t«.. +:- 4= ti.- Ia- �� tF=. +�= 4- V�o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w V V V V �„ L, L L L L L L �- aaa ci.ao. o..aa ao..a sc u � �,, v� N � c �t o 0 0 0 � w w Ta �a� � v; d; �; Y � N (V N N V � � � � O � d y�.. � � � � � v Y t0 CO CD CO � C� �p � cfl CO � m � C � � � �� p � � U � Q. m m � Ofl O .ri �-o mo mo C � p Z p Z r- Z C �'- N` � � m N � t a ao °.o °.� � �y �/ �o/ ,o y m y LL� LL L-. LL. L. � � � �o �o `�c �C w �� a�i � a�i Q. r. Q �- p, N p. M p_ Q v C O C � C 0 �� O C O Q O Q � Q. � Q' U U � � � � � � � � O m � 3 N � > N N N � � Y Q� U C (0 L U .-� C N v � a� a N c4 .� N d � � C (0 N E N L F- m N � :� c� A O � � d � � L � a� � a � 00 0 rn � � o � N U � a� � � � � C O � O A � O N �, C �p � � N � C � Y C 'a (0 G N (0 � L '�_ � � '� a s � U � �' � U .°n o � � � �o�ro U U � N J � � N O � 00 �o M N � � O � � � O �1 Z � O � � � C O � O CD s� J � � a � O � 01 � > m d J � .Q � (6 r:a � � ` 3 � a a d `° � � v � �� m� ro J .O V m Q �w � c � Z � d W p � .�C � � a� � � � m � s � d C9 � � p � o � N F a' � '` �� m Q ',o� O d � c � � � a► s O � � 'd N � �" ° � o c W � o � �r = N � � �- � � � � d "'� N U � C � U � � .�L cp 47 C a7 �� C �`p O m � 11] � �U � I c ^ � O � �O � O w O � y, O G � W � � o' � O N W _ t�.1 � V � V O �(L e�- � � O � M lti � � �tp � � � � � � ~ � � �O � � y "'' ++ C � � � � J � J � J O y v � � L � q1 O m� N � L � � �� `+ N LQ m m da 7 � N C O � � w a�+ +�+ U � 'p "O v_ 'C3 p � Q � � 3 � 3 � �'a � L V � L r a.. O O� �i �C L L � � � C m m m � p N zm w � 0 U .0 L *' C s _ .� •� .� o � — � x � z � _ � m ._ � � �� u� � � � o �e ro" ch a m •�- a> .-� e� Q � � c`a .i`o � � y ~ m m m m � 0 ro � � _ .�• = ►. > 3 � �� o °r' m c °� o �y o :a [o a� o ,� d � ,� � � N � �; R �: � o u b :n v- N �r- CV � '-' O"-' �- r' N tY„1 � l7 � � � � � � � � � t� N N T 0 N O � 'Q f� � C u� �3 N a�'i 'Q N y � � � — y� �,,, ,C N .L] l0 (O � � v�- d � � N 0� �-�- � Y CO t0 v.N (D a��+ �" `' 7 m •L � m � � O � N � cn � � L � � � a> cu '� ro �`' y � (6 � •� � � � � N 7 r.+ �+ � � Y m d � .y � � >+ d w �' m+�' �' +��' d � C tn z C U1 Z C V% (A G � O � � � Q7 � C � � � � U c�a �� N �� m O£ •N C m � � � m � � � � � � p � i O � � _ (w,0 t�6 Z �S V Z � V Z Q p � E N I p N I p Q �� N �� d N i:r p M'� p d' Q � C Q � p O � O 0 � O � d� � O � O � O � Zla�i mrn _ � o T O N d ° � � o c o � ° � ° p � o � "i u,l � W ' � � O N � � V �.r � +r � ++ � +' � 0 �= p� o Q � Q � O � � Q �O y 4' � �fn � £ � � � � � � � � � � O w a N � +.C,' �„� ++ � G�l C � � � � � � � J � J O r v � � -a J o tfl G. O — d � C� O C� � 61 O m� N 3 ,L Q% ` � 'L, •` +i� Y � V1 d m W W � O � � � � d J � +�+ O :,_. (� `t' Y Y � :i � �U � � � � � � � Q � 4 3 � � � 3 � � � �� o V �, a d c� .` cN" .� � d � � H cs� a��i N ,` �y L � t0 z d � � !�0 l�0 �0 .a � � •o U m m m m � o a�i ¢ a c Z m •. Z �� v ar U � °- �' � p � = t c � � c � �d �+ 'y •� . 0 �._ � � a�i � _ � � � 2 � _ � m = v � m � � L (� � •ct .�C V ••• cO a � � � y Q1 M ,d N C1 c- � r O a� c- � f-- 1a .� ` ` �- � N co � �� m m m m v� Q = r�- o � C :-. Z G1 C ,N �+ �•+ � � .� C� t � � ,r+ � r. > � �� •� N d � d � r o�; ea c � ,� h p � C y p `1j' p � N m N f� ' w O i �„ ^ ++ �y Y " tn 0. t0 � — � R � � � � p e.1 � . N .n _ > !�0 �G � x r � � ja � p � � ~ � � � � � � V � � � � � O _ � � � T � � � � N � N y a N N U � �- � — � '� �' 'C ,p C �p (�p !ti CD y,�„ � � Gf � � � 61 � � V �G �p '!C CU C� N � �' '� � N � ��° L� � �aN � � � �, d m °' '� �L d E io ` °}.' � � � c`a � � E � m � m N m y C! +.y+ T N G1 �, d C (n (J �' C Z� N � C � z� � N C 0 c� d y d G� � y C� �. G1 � '� O � '� C � � C � C � � Q � y p�°p � � � m � � c`a � � �`a `o p N o �E � m a�� C� m �U « i�. � .N L � m ir � y"/ � ((i :n V V Z �j (� Z `�•r C� Z � p (n € �o _ 30 �, i o a� i a � ► a, N �� '�+ � a� ++ � N++ p M+. p V' O N C O Q — a. 00 � op � o� � °O � ° � �' a O � O � O � O � O ti� zI ai r ��' t! lr `\r �<_t c" 'Y``\ _.. 1 .', I � \ . . .Es ' �' . � � j jjj� i r � �. � � � ,,�'`� �) ,9:.��', �` "� �� , . - _ . - � 1 � i . � �� , A �� y �� ,�� i � 't �4 1 .r�} e�:� ;� � :' _ � � i, i � .,�, •. � f; � 1 j 4 ��. .�r ��fJ ' � t � ,+� \ : ,, l. ��'�:, � ,�.: `� . �� r ' `'. f d � i \ � �� 2. �'�• � 1 � . ; `i ' , '� �,A�` `:�� '� {/ •� � ' �''�� i �� <� ' � ','� �.; .�'� f�.� -._ � � . •" > . _ � �!. i ) j � �� i l. G: t '�f ,� �� n � ,� \ �� 1 � .. � - �.� �� ..�� f-� , 1 ! r � " � - t y � � � - � �.? � � � x �� '^".�, ' � .� � .. 1 �, �� f ' / " -.� 1 ' \ . � s • f s . / *.,, . ` `I � f. ._'l`. , ''s> �� ~^ .-.: 4 `` 1 � . . `�/`� ` i ' } � '� y i � !i' .� � t .: F 5�. `�_ � � \ /,%^ ''' '�` ) . f �r µ_ ' ' �, ' � ."'*`" . � \ . tY .' �� ' •� , , _�...�.,�,..� '�� _ ��,i-.�, � ,-�t ` `\i, � � � �. / � � .. . � � � ' � — � ��,"'r�� .- - ' � r �' s � �' - � .� � � r j� r � , � � �� '�} ',' � .. � ,- i \ `'; ` y`� � �:•�.� � . _ ,�;�'� — �' i` I . ��. �" .. _ / � `r . �� . _ � � j � I � �� - �. � � 1 . �' �.. - ��.. `1 i I . t — 1 . � � f � i i � � � 4 \> t ��, � ,Z ' � 1 � �+- '7 �' f /� /e� y.. � �'.-�"'� . � i `. � \ � ,.'� 3 � ^ , .- j � .,_�`i.`�, � � �� • ''.^t J ' /� !�1 {.3 �. 1�.�� \ \\ `� � � �� G i,�� '� _ �`� W.. r . � �'�, .� ' � �E � � .• �,�� i '=� ��..�� . . �., .' _ R � J ( r i f t � �_t , '�`�-.'� � �� .� �� ^ C � � '� 1� A ' � _ � �� i. � . .• � � / f98Ri . � , � 4 _ i � ,�� L � � , "�e_�� . � � . � � , ,` r � � , � � , , � r �, , \� �� , ��i _ yt�� ,��1 � ti �t � .{ r �1. _ � \; t�: ��\�- + .a-• �'— - -�.' � � t �,\� �,.}..� v y � � � �., �`+^ • ` '� � \ <c'�. A� '�^ �� --..�% - � �� '� �l• i ; � ' •, 't � ��i � ,�`:. �� A� �; S �'--� ` �� , _ , :r � � � '� , � � . � v '. .. �\ -' t "` i ,�, ".� - ' �''�.� - , �� ' �'�� , , � \.. � � . �� j� - �� 'I7 �r, w -�7 Y� �_ ' -- �a�:na�lJ� _\ 1 y ':� \ f ` � �' Cr, L t - �/ 'J'" `' •' 7ri R G�- � � - _ � ` �; � � � �� ,;, ``—...-�'' ` . �� ,�d �� - .+� - - �,' �`'� .' �` -y� \ � �,� ^f r' � � r�. ':� �; ��,, •''' - � �s c �/ , ��`� . '` � � �, • � • • 1 l� �' ! .� V`\}}'.��l' _ t. ,/'�. . .�� 4. �.�� • �� :�� . ' � �� i� � �17z ' �. ..- � '` � ' r�► � j i �� al I . . • . � � �+ '' ,,, ti.::. -�-�- .' 1 —t � . t . ��r""�--� f � •,� � ,� . �' �� i t� - .. . ,�±�r�i, . • � `� � '- __ �� . t �i, 1 y 1 :� - f'• �� : � �� .�� .'..- � .� . �' •'1 � 'ti � \ � � �'� ��. . `r Fi - � �.-.1 * .3 �� ,, . ,% fJf t� � ' � 1 . - ,r / ` r SJ�• �I _ �� ' � _-._ , ,� f t� , - _ - _ , •� � -�.� _ ., �— _ _ _ �,, t •-'. . � r. J�'. �! ' � � - . `4 . , � � y • ` � . . . � : i�, �.�,%- __-- 1%aiI Timber j ,', . .. � > � :-. , � , -'-::`'.,-.! � L:., - � -� � _ _ -_ _! � , '�.. t _ = � / r �t:,l . !� Ridge�Property.(` - : . . `"� t` � �' ��;k �.� � -� � ��, e: I �' � ' ^`` i� ' A i (�\ r, /��`� �! 1( � .' .� Z� • � J � '�,1_ � y� ��` � ��, / � i � � �� 7it ' � � - � `-' � _ ' _ '� � � � � � = � � � � \� . -7 � � + ��L`- ��1 � J • r . � �,/p �, j% � �. . � ""^^�_.-�''...` a93y2 �- � � ' _ __... -�,_�. � �'"'.± � ° E ' . - � � � � � � �� I � ! � . � %, " . � . Q � . � '� ' ��1��f�, , `♦ t ' '� ` / �' `l �/�; %� " r>> _ �z � `'� �_ - r. � •C ' " � � _ `� E ,. J ' � -�,._ , _ � " �� '�J �' Wes��'a►t .< • � : �r �,,-�-��. �� , �. _ - - . : � . ��, , , �,' � _� , , .�� . r . s�. r � _ _ � ��. ' � }� A.� , � �'I ,_-, . � - - ,r ` , _ _ . /��f�� • y et , � i�� - . r �."� i' � , r r Y . " , �o _ 1 . • u. r� t r r � � . � 5 . � :- �� i.�X �'i' / �� l �t . �� 1 � ~ ' � � �.,. . _ 7 �,�' J / % ' � I 1 r�"�--. - �� • - f � i �,.1" . � �� '� -"� � �� _�-'' 1 / - ..�� _ � _ �'�� .. �7-r--:•� �%i "� � f '�k`' ' �" / ,, � , i (�;' � � >= � s ! .. r � — . � ;,,' ' . . � r� i / �. , � �� ' - ^ •. .• '-� . .. . . . `, S�" � l / �% i�:: � /' .; �►id . . s � 1 y ' ' / Z�� f -�J ,�! _ ' - .. i " 4,i / '. j ! 'J -.. .... ., ` � . ^ s (+� � / � l / _ �� ... _ ._ �»- -i ' �� ` � ( t t r ` � 1 �'��^+.� � � � _° '.' • _ ,� � -"�. � "� ' �i � � , / T ' p � �� . � � . _.-''" - `\ . i, /' i ._ . .� - �.. '�1>r�t,l ,►� /� o�- ' % ``,f �>;��e�� , � �' �� i ,,' � /% '_ — r,� ,, n - �`1 �`.l �I! �j-`� �� i� � � �t H ��= � � ',]L � . . . . _ . � ._ . . .. . � 3^`- _ Hp � Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project 109 3106 C�0'L Project Site Location HEPWORTHPAWLAK GEOTEGHNICAL p 2000 ft. � I I Scale: 1 in. = 2000 ft. Contour Interval = 40 ft. Figure 1 Explanation: �Post-Glaclal Faults: Fauk younger than about 15,000 years. Larger Historic Earthquakes: OEarthquakes with maximum intensity greater than VI • or magnitude greater than M 5.0 irom 1867 to presenL � Nuclear Explosioo: Large underground nudear explosion for natural gas reservoir enhancement. �Historic Seismic Zones: Areas with historicalty high seismic adNity. M local, surface wave or body wave magnitude VI Modified Mercalli intensity References: Widmann and Others (1998) U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Catalogs 0 50 mi. l 1 I Scale: 1 in. = 50 mi. ^ �-tpt�h Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project I Figure 2 109 310B «►'o Geologically Young Faults and Larger Historic Earthquakes HEPWORiH�PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL � � MZ .. � p � � ,,,�� c�ranoy � � Y r Mz � M YXr Mz d� Kremmling YXr TKi \ y �, � YXr YXr �p � a Ti co � wu�a �O MZ �� R� TS YX TKS X� Tabemash YXr h��'8� A Ts o�� dr� Pz �G YXr �� Z Fraser Tv Ts 7v � °'c z � Mz � Ti ��a � Tv � �S �. ,�� '�i,e Ste Bridge MZ R�. �S � Tv v �� a�9e Ts �i� � � Mz � T� ��rqy Ts � T e4�S G ?2N� � T� b � C�� ^ � Mz �o � � TKi olcott C�' �C� \ o� � � � �y pZ �' � I �-�— G eta �� Edwa�ds �c��m Project YXr ��' 1 ' ('li � __ � Avan Site�,f� .�-�—�,, Silve m .�.. ` 1� Tv Pze _��`'� � va�i � N7 b v ��r� � c�� rs �s Tf YXr nz Ts Pz � I "'p'�G�, Mz PZ Mintum � 1 PZ r �r r : Frisco G� TKi � � � � ` Red CIiH 7 Mz P YXr y'y ` YXr / G�pe � � TKi q � ! tn. � �W ke ' T\K� / Pando T�� " � p� Pz �,, i` T TKi TKi TKi C , � Pz � ` � Ti �C� � � �1 ; T • Pz .. � �m YXr � TKi �eNersan,; Mz Tv Ti C�imax PZ � � TKi '/ TKi i` � � Z �T� � . �J �J � r T y y .. � '� . Como.. �U l � �� , TK �� ` TK_ ^ � �p '!1 N � MZ �o� � TKi Tu oRes � � ��f TKi . �a �� p� � TKi �, 1� �. S Explanation: Ts P�st-Laramide Sediments MZ Pre-Laramide Mesozoic Sediments Contact Post-Laramide VolcaNcs Paleozoic Sediments High-Angle Faults Post-Laramide Intrusives - Pennsvlvanlan Evaporites ''' Thrust Faults 0 7 mi Laramide Basin Sediments �� Precambrian CNStalline Rocks � S1lnclines � � � Scale 1 in. = 7 mi. � Laramide Intrusives HiAhwavs Modified from: Tweto (1979; H Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project 109 3106 t@Cil Figure 3 HEPWOFIfHi'NWLAKGEOTECHNICAL Regional Geology Map � � L� .� � � � _ . . ! j J - �./ . . � � l 1 � � � O � mc,� . � 1�'c 1..�, �rl""_ � 5+�, . : ' _�� -3'� � . , J i ,; ,' w y �! l, � �- 2 � QGO�m � � • � r a � � �` , � , , o � _ ,n',� r / _ _�� j , � � � � )if �� W , , � � , � �s.e.'� �� .; l ��` � � �'38�%�' �..,...e .._. _._. .'" � .. � x �' ;,¢, � �� --_.�� Qm � QC/�m � ' � �' '� , �/ � ! , __. , 'I � � ; �'` � . , : >,f ` ,. , � - ;. ��µ ;; ;. %� � l -�` l � o - � ,, . �; � _ . . �� ' , �� , � � � � � � ��a"� � � ��7f i7 ' ,t ` %�'"f � � `� s � } \ s -�° � "� "�� ' �� , .� s ,' � .._ ,- „ = � �rfi�0 `-�d . ' �-��%j'� ei�,{ ,�� _ � �" — _ m � � J�� g � ij .� � � "� % % � BS 8 �psPen r� '( �- ! I � . /{� a \ ` / � ,� � ,. Z�. . --�"� � , �Jli � �� =QC/�fTl , � - '� �6 � B �/ � � Eu� ��" �, � �� 7 � BB � �� 9 / �.� .. , �� f � � � � �� l /� , ,' . , af � � r �, �� ! � �, � ' � i . 5 ��. - 1� a , _ � � , -� � -�. ;�, � � j . .._ . , f . � �i i �� ' � �� `�j, � d � ' ' e , " i � ag0�' �'- f �>„ �� rr r ;ir„=..11rr � �,� ,�� % ,'�� s��, ; l � � . �� r,� � s � e -o ��t°� r � ��.i .� �} � 81 � �� ,, _. , , , /o� , o = r — . ,, , � � , �� li - � . �o ;,� , � /j;�,�°-' �r / - / � ,,..,:;, Q / � C ' � cr y o . p - ��,,, . / �!� Qm1 � � N 32 _. o � _ �� . � �� (D � � ° �� g��+1 � � �'-"�� pR0 ti � Ct I � � rt a Qcl�m � �'��j ` N � U � ni � � ;t-+� ' 1,.� -' �°� �''� � � Qm1 � � Qm1 ', � G� � % % '" = , fh: ¢ ' / aF ��o �� v, r . ` af i -% � � � �'/ �� i r � Qmt ��1 ,''M � � �� Qa ta o p � �� \`�.� Q� �! � -� � Qm2 ' ,�� /ilml � � ��, ;� � �� . � � �'� � y ` ef �'��;_'' � ( g v �. � / 1 $'�` �', /'� / / g j'' `A�c.+ J `°L ,y� "-'D / ) ! /�,. ✓ /� � � + � qS 0 � r 1 � Explanation: � af Man-Placed Fili: Colluvium over Mirrturn Formatfon • ExPloratory Bo�ings Mostly road fills B1 � Rock Outcrops Qa Post-Glacial 8tream Alluvium ssc. � Cross Sections: Contact: Une of cross sections shown on Qm� Younper Moralnes: Approximate boundary of map units. Figures 5 through 8 and 10 through Pinedale-age till in tertninal and ground � 3_ � moraines. + Verv Lame Rcekfali Biocks � 2� �" 30 StNke and Dip: � � � � Qm2 Oider Moraines: �� Seismlc Lines � Strike and dip of bedding in degrees. Scale: 1 in. = 250 R. � Bull Lake-age till in lateral moraine. Contour Intenral: 10 ft. � December 2009 � e e , 0 � w � 0 _ � my z O � T � �� 0 n x z n a r < v -i � � m c�D � o fl- �� m s � � a m �. < o � � o � 3 m � � -� O n .m 1'I � C � N CJt (Northwest) 8500 8400 � 8300 c � m > w $200 8100 8000 7900 0 ($OUtFI@BSt� 8500 8400 8300 � c 0 .� > 8200 w 8100 8000 7900 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Horizontal Distance (ft.) Scale 1 in. = 200 ft. Horizontal = Vertical Explanation: af Man-Placed Fill: Inciudes existlng road fllls and flll needed for redevebpment projed. � Colluvlum � Post-(ilaclal Stream Alluvium �� Youngor Moraine: Pinedale-age till in tertninal and ground morelnes. � Mintum Formadon contact: Approximate boundary of map units. NOt@S: 1. See Figure 4 for cross section location. � � 0 � w � 0 W x � 0 � T � rF n� 0 � z � � c 0 .� > m w < � � � � N � m � 0 0- O � Q � < � � � cD �- � < o � � o N � � m � "D a m � � � C � N � (Northwest) (Southeast) 8600 6500 8400 8300 8200 8100 8000 0 7900 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 S00 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Horizontal Distance (ft.) Scale 1 in. = 200 ft. Horizontal = Vertical Explanation: �Man-Placed Fill: Includes exisGng road fills and flll needed fw redevebpment pro�d. Q� Colluvlum Qa Post-Glaclal Stream Alluvium Qm� Younger Morafna: Pinedale-age till in tertninal and ground moraines. MinWm FortnaUon — Contact: Approximate boundary of map units. I Exaloratorv Borino B3 NOt@S: 1. See Figure 4 for cross section location. • � 0 , 0 � w , � cNo�hWest, m 8600 � 0 � I 8500 � �� 8400 n x z � +� 8300 c 0 � m > W 8200 < N � 3 � m (�D 'Z—�- 0 0- o `Q n fD < � � � N °- n« < O � � o w � 3 m � � O cu' � 'n � c � m V 8100 8000 7900 0 cso�tneest� 8600 8500 8400 8300 8200 8100 8000 7900 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 S00 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Horizontai Distance (ft.) Scale 1 in. = 200 ft. Horizontal = VeAical Explanation: af Man-Placed Fill: InGudes existlng road fills and flll needed for redevelopment projed. Q� Colluvlum �� Younger Moraine: Pinedale-sge tlll in tertninal and grour� moraines. - Mintum Formatlon — Contact: Approuimate boundary of map units. IE�wbratorv Borina B1 NOt@S: 1. See Figure 4 for cross sectan bcation. � � � � 0 co w i 0 W x � 0 � a I � �� O n I 2n t' < N � � Q N m � 0 0- o � a � � � � � n � � o � � o A � � m � � 1 0 cD � �'I � C � N � (No�thwest) (Southeast) asoo � Geology Section 4 86� �' a 8500 Qc � ra� d�8� �+�� 8500 � �—�PPer OutuioP ... ,,. Top of PofeMial RodctaN Start Lowe� Oulcrop �� QC QC c��m 8300 � v 8300 �o n. H�gn � � �m Q� S/�pess� � o m o m W 8200 � af �aeuoy °z 8200 W Buildirg P � a LL 8100 8100 �m Qc af Z ./ Qm1 8000 $�� 6'm 7900 �� 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Hor¢ontal Distence (fl.) Scale 1 in. = 200 ft. Horizontal = Verticai Explanation: af Man-Placed Fill: indudes exisfing road 8As and fi8 needed for redevelopment projecL Qc Colluvlum Qm� Younaer Moreine: Pfnedalaage till in tertn�al and ground moraines. Mintum Formetlon Contact: Approximate boundary of map units. NOt@S: 1. See Figure 4 for cross section location. � C3 � � 0 co w � 0 � _ my 2 O � � � �� 0 n z � < m � C� v � � � � n � 01 �p Q � °��, a 3 < � fD °� � m m w � "p 0 tD � � co c 1 � � 0 8500 �� 8300 � c �° 8200 m > m w 8100 8000 /11'1f�f1 I1_I.L__1!_.� f1��l.1� /f 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Horizontal Distance (ft.) CRSP Profile 0 ft. = 512.0 ft. on Geology Section 3 Explanation: AP - Malysis PaM Pm/Qc - Limit of rodc outcrop staA zone Scale 1 in. = 100 ft. Horizontal = VeRical Notes: 1. See Figure 9 for profile locapon. • � � a m W ...1 0 � x � � a � � ��i � < n � � '� '0 3 � � � `-° 3 Q � ro � o a � < � � � �o m 3 _ W � � � � cc o, .� co � � � c� i � �� 8300 � 4 szoo � m W 8900 8000 �.r�r�e� �_�--°`---� r�__e—_ r�__r.�_ • 0 100 200 ° 300 400 500 600 CRSP Profile 0 ft. =152.fi ft. on Geology Section 1 v Nortzontat Otstance (Sk) Scale 1 in. =100 ft. Hortzontal= Verttcal Explanation: AP - Analysis Potnt AL - Noith property line PrtJQc - Lirni! of rock outcxop start zone Notes: 1. See Figure 9 for profile locatbn. � � � � � 0 co w � 0 W z � � _ � ��x �Q F < � � �; c�n 3 � a n m � � �O � v m � c � m � Q c y m tG O � t7 'fJ � m a� � -� N p �D � T �O c m ...i N 8400 8300 � c x° 8200 i � W 8100 8000 CRSP Conceptual Design Profile 2 0 100 � Hori ontal Dlstance {ft.) 400 500 690 700 CRSP Proflle 0 ft. = 355.4 ft. � Geology Section 1 Scale 9 in. =10Q ft_ Horizontal = Vertical Explanation: AP -Anaiysis Point PL - Norih property line PmlQc - Llmtt of rock outcxop start zone Notes: 1. See Figure 9 for proflle tocation. � • 4 , 0 � w � 4 W x � � � � � 0 � � < a� � � � � n � o � � � w v co � c � m � m < N �p � o � ti � � � M m � W o cti T � � c cu � w 8500 8400 8300 a,-,�: C O 8•Z00 .' m w 8100 8000 Explanation: AP - Analysis Pofnt PL - North Property Line PrtJQc - Limit of rock outcrop start zone �+�nr�r.-----�---� �--=-- r�__r.�_ n o �o0 2oa soo aoo sao sao HorizonffiI Distance (ft.) CRSP Proflle 0 ft. = 512.0(t. on Geology Section 3 Scale 1 in. = 900 ft. Horizontal = VerUcal Notes: 1. See Figure 9 for profile bcatlan. Page 1 of 6 Lee Thomas . .�m: Arthur Morton (morton.arthur@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 4:22 PM To: Darren Woody; Mark Lear; Kim Swetich; Lee Thomas Subject: Fwd: Cost Estimate - EIR for Vail Timber Ridge FYI! Here is another proposal from Western Ecological Resources for an EIR required as part of the entitlement process in Vail. Arthur 303/475.8016 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: WesternEco <mail@westerneco.com> Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:13 PM Subject: Cost Estimate - EIR for Vail Timber Ridge To: morton.arthur@gmaiL_com Arthur: f our request, we are providing a proposal to complete an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the redevelopment of the east half of the Timber Ridge Apartment Complex in Vail, Colorado. We will prepare an EIR in accordance with Chapter 12 of the Town of Vail Code, Environmental Impact Report Guidelines. 1.0 Existing Environment We will describe the Existing Environment of the 5.2 acre project site per the required disciplines of the guidelines. They include the following conditions: 1.1 Hydrology • Surface water features and drainage • Ground water levels from geotechnical borings or other data 12 Atmosphere • We will use the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment data to describe the ambient air � condition of the project site. 8/6/2009 � Page 2 of 6 1.3 Geology and Hazards . Description of the landform, slope, and soil conditions of the project site . Document that there are no 100 year floodplains or other geologic hazards on the project site . Document the geomorphology and subsurface condition from existing data 1.4 Biology . Brief description of man-created landscape vegetation . Brief description of urban adapted wildlife use of site . Document that there are no federally listed species on the project site 1.5 Noise & Odors . Document noise generating features of the existing development . Document that there are no features onsite that generate odors 1.6 Visual • Brief analysis of the aesthetics of existing structures and how they blend or do not blend with adjacent structures and the general architectural theme of the town. 1.7 Land Use . Identify existing zoning . Document the existing land use, ie. residential land use; number of units, parking, landscaping, open space, snow storage, etc. . Compatibility with officially approved use 1.8 Circulation and Transportation 8/6/2009 . Existing access and traffic flow patterns . Volume of traffic generated by current land use Page 3 of 6 • Access to alternative transportation 1.9 Population . Number of residential units . Estimate of population 2.0 Proposed Development We will describe the proposed development, including: • Number of residential units and amenities . Architectural style of buildings • Roads, access, and traffic circulation • Parking structure • Snow storage � • Landscaping • Open space • Utilities • Stormwater management 3.0 Impacts and Mitigation 3.1 Hydrology • Discuss any changes to management of surface water • Discuss any need to pump ground water from foundation drains of buildings and parking structure 3.2 Atmosphere . Use data from the State to document that redevelopment has no measureable impact on ambient air quality �= 8/6/2009 Page 4 of 6 3.3 Geology and Hazards . Document that there are no geologic hazards or soil issues or impacts . Document lack of impacts to 100 year floodplains . Document engineering method to develop on steep slopes 3.4 Biology • Document that the project would replace urban landscaping with urban landscaping and have no impact on the urban-adapted wildlife 3.5 Noise & Odors • Document noise leveis for the construction period • Document that noise levels of the development when completed would not measurably rise above the levels of the existing buildings • Document that the project would not produce odors 3.6 Visual • Describe how the development would blend with the existing architectural style of the Town and be a visuai amenity . Describe benefits of proposed landscaping 3.7 Land Use . Describe how the project would conform to the existing land use and be compatible 3.8 Circulation and Transportation • Document that the development would create a traffic volume somewhat higher than the existing condition . Document that the traffic flow pattern would not disrupt normal traffic patterns in the Town and create congestion • Describe use of alternative transportation that would reduce the need for automobiles l� 8/6/2009 Page 5 of 6 3.9 Population . Discuss potential increase in population • Document benefits of increased population; ie. space to house the local work force, increased consumer spending, etc. 4.0 Cumulative and Long-term Effects and Irreversible Environmentat Changes Discuss the cumulative and long-term effects and irreversible environmental changes to the inventoried resources. 5.0 Cost Estimate Table 1 provides a cost estimate for the project based on our current understanding of the project. Please note, we typically work only on a time and materials basis. 6.0 Qua�ifications Western Ecological Resource is an ecology consulting firm serving Colorado and the western United States. We offer a full range of ecological services from an interdisciplinary team of specialists. We have provided ecological services to clients in the Vail area for more than 30 years. Please refer to our website at www.westerneco.com for further details. Examples of long-term existing c � in the Vail area include Vail Resorts Development Company and East West Partners. We have been producing Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) for developments in Eagle County for 10 years. Examples of recent EIRs include: • East West Partners — Riverfront Project in Avon . Knight Planning Services - Hook Spur Ranch . Eagle Rock & Stone — Pando Quarry • Schmidt Ranch — Gypsum Ranch Sand and Gravel Pit Amendment for Employee Housing Please call if you need further information or have questions. Da��id � 8/6/2009 Professional Categor� Sr. Plant Ecologist D.Johnson GraphicslAutoCAD Operator K.Inouye Clerical S. Cornett TABLE 1 Cost Estimate Timber Ridge Apartment Complex Environmental Impact Report Hours/Rates 60 hrs @ $125 6 hrs @ $50 8 hrs @ $48 Total Time Expenses Auto Mileage 220 miles @ $0.50 Telephone/Fax/Postage/Courier Copies/Blueprints/Color PrintslPlotting Photography Total Expenses TOTAL Task ��,s�: ;�� .<r ,: 4'I�STEP��t ��''+yt��i, t�?j.�G`�i�A��}..�r ��s��1'�I3L.�y �OYI.s�. D 5 � �f�a�4Y?3� �w'�r�S �ik��. S�'.�C9� `�ri.«Q� ;::J��. dL� `a?,�7�P �3P u:� :� •1-0� „�F�'}� � 8/6/2009 Total $ 7,500 $ 300 $ 384 $ 8,184 $ 110 $ 100 $ 200 $ 100 $ 510 $ 8,694 Page 6 of 6 Timber Rid�e The town issued a Request for Qualifications and Proposals for the eastern half of the 10- acre Timber Ridge parcel in December 2008. The Vail Local Housing Authority (VLHA) and staff interviewed six of the ten teams who responded. On April 21, 2009, Town Council and the VLHA interviewed four finalists and selected Vail Timber Ridge, LLC for exclusive negotiations on May 5, 2009. On October 20, 2009, Town Council authorized the Town Manager to enter into a pre-development agreement with Vail Timber Ridge, LLC, which establishes the terms for the predevelopment process and parameters for the eventual development of the property for employee housing. As a first step in meeting the requirements of the pre-development agreement, a pre-application meeting was held among Vail Timber Ridge, LLC, the Town Council, the Vail Local Housing Authority, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board on October 27, 2009. The following key items need to be completed and or addressed over the next two years for this project to be successful: —« Need some words re: the submission and application process» George? — Determine extent of and methods of rockfall mitigation needed and negotiate cost sharing — Negotiate land lease as outlined in the pre-development agreement — Obtain release from US Bank letter of credit agreement, which requires entire 10 acres as collateral; if unsuccessful, identify and execute alternative financing for remaining five acres — Design, bid, and construct frontage road improvements — Assist Vail Timber Ridge in discussions with other agencies such as Eagle River Water and Sanitation District re: taps and fees; Eagle County re: property tax exemptions; « need some others» Until demolition of the buildings on the eastern half takes place, Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation (TRAHC) will continue to direct the operations of the entire complex. Following demolition, TRAHC will continue operations of 96 remaining units. TRAHC incurred over $22 million of debt for the purchase and remediation of the property. In December 2009, TRAHC prepaid $740,000 of Series 2003B bonds and made the first scheduled principal payment on the 2003A bonds, reducing the outstanding debt to $18,920,000 of bonded debt plus $1.9 million owed the Town of Vail. Over the next two years, TRAHC needs to manage the operations of the project (either in its current configuration or on the western half only) to meet all debt service requirements while providing affordable rental housing to the community. � � � ` \-�LZ.�� ,Yj�f�Q . l��i �4,` v , �.`��5� � �i u -E-_ MEMORANDUM i,L�'�I J� TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: December 16, 2009 SUBJECT: Deed Restricted Employee Housing Existing Deed Restricted EHUs 655 Units 1,081 Beds (average 1.65 emps/unit) Existing Jobs (average emp has 1.3 9,100 Jobs 6,100 Emps jobs) 30% of Vail's Emps � 4-Icx-ibluc� 90��-� Existing Deficit Opportunities Timber Ridge 1/2 Redevelopment Arosa Duplex Chamonix (58 Units) First Chair (North Day Lot) Red Sandstone Tot Lot Gore Range Condos II - Redevelopment ITotal Net New Employee Beds � Remaining Deficit 1,830 Emps 749 Beds Net New Emp Beds 178 3.3 95.7 24 .��'r -�-�- 317.5 �• per the development plan I on average on average per the development plan on average on average '�� '�-`t�� The average employee occupied unit (deed restricted and free market) in the Town of Vail has 1.65 employees living in it. At Timber Ridge there are four employees living in each unit. � ,, . � . FRE-DEVEL(}PMENT AGREERZENT "�HTS PRE-DEVELt�T'MENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement"} is made this _��' day of ��,�`f�.;.,,��" , 200) (the "Effective Date"), by and bet��een the Town �f Vail, Golorado, a Colorado he�me rule municipality, (the "Town"), Timber Rid�e Affc�rdable Housing Carporation, a Colorado non-profit corporation (the "Carporatioai") and Vail 'I i�nber ltidge LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporatian (°Develop�:r"}, (individually a"Party" and callectively ttle "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Corporation is the owner of certain re�l ��ropertv, more particularly des�ribed in �xhibit A attached hereto and it�cor��orated }�erein by t11is ref-erence (the "Property"); W�iEREAS, on December 18, 2408, the Totivn issued a rec�uesi far prt�posals ("RFP") seeking qualitied individuals or organizatians to devela� the Property fc�r em�lc�yee housing; WHEREAS, Dr;veloper subrnitted a respons�; to thE RFP, �uid The T+awn selected Developer's respanse ta the RFP as the best optian f or develo�rnent of the Praperty for empl�yee housing; WHEREAS, to acc�mpiish the development af the Property for en�ployee hausing, the Corporation woutd retain fee o�.�rnership of the f'roperty, but wauld pravide Develaper with a Iong- ternl ground lease �f the Yroperty; and WHF.,REAS, the Parties wish ta establislt terms of the pre-development process and parameters of the eventual developmeni af the }'rc�perty tor employee l;ousing. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideratio�� of the mutual promises and covenanis contai�ied herein, the sufficiency af ��hich is mutually acknativledged, the parties hereta agree as follows: 1. Exclusive t3�tion to D�velo�. During the term ofthis A�re�mel�t and subject to all ot� its terms, Develc�per sh�ill have the exclusive optian to develop the Property for employee honsin�. 2. Parameters of Development. The eventual development of the Froperty far employee l�ousin� ("Develc�pmei�t") shal( be subject to the execution of a mutually acceptable development improvement agre�ment ("DIA'"}. Tl�e Dev�lopment shall meet the following parameters, which may be further detailed in the DIA: a. Except as otherwise e�pressly> provided in this Agreement and the DIA, the Development shall at all times be subject t� the Vail �r�� c�ae. b. The Town shall provide the I3evelc�per with a long-term ground lease of the Property, with an initial term of sirty (60} years, plus three (3} opiions ta renew for a period of ten (] 0) years each, fi�r no additional compensatian, with each renewal option contingent upan the condition that all iinprov�ments on 2he Site are in good eonditia�� and the b�uildings on the Site are habitabl� ("Ground Lease"). All re�ntals due under the Ground Lease wilt bs reflected by a one-time up-front pa}�rnent o�feleven rnillion dallars ($11,C104,000) due at the Grc�und Lease Closing. All iinpr�vements constructed an the Property shall be o�vned by Developer; provided that> to the extent necessary for ta� pur��oses anci mutually agreed hy the i � i��l ,41Ni��) ��'i��l ��11 * 7[ �c 0 0 O D D 2 3 9 2• I Ul L"200A C: iUC>CtIA1F-/IA4M/Rl;t( OC:-21.5-1 i7'fi",t4f''��"FGftFtG'/SF`:T1�1£fER R/LK'iE PRE-D/A 6.DOC , .. � 1 E � � � Parties, Dcveloper may grant to the Toivn ar its housing authority� a one-percent { 1%} interest in such improvemenfis. c. Developer shall canduct at least t�ne pre-appl'zcatian conference witli the "I'own Council, the Developn�ent Re��ie�v I3oard ("DRB"} and the Planning and Environm�ntal Commission ("PEC") �rior tc� subrtaittin�; its initial application for �the Development. Such pre-application conf:erence is an opportunity for Deti�cl�per to hear comments from the Tawn Council, ttze DRB and the PEC cvi�cerning the Developrnent, but the "Town shall not be bound by any such comments, �nd any� reliance on such conl�nents shall be at Dci,velaper's o��vn risk. d. Developer shall submit to the Town the initial application for the I7evelapment on or before April 1, 2010. The application ntust be si�ned by the Toum and the Gc�rporati�n, because the Corporation will remain the fee owner of the Property and the "I'own and the C;orporation must consent to the Develop�nent applicatian. tlll applications for the Property shall be processed in accordance with the Vail Town Code. e. The Develapment shall include three hundred fifty-nine (359) Employee Iiausing Iltzits capahle of housin� five hundred seventy (S7Cl} beds fc�r employees, as the term "employee" is deiined in Sectic�n 12-2-2 of the Vail Town Gc�de. It is aeknati�rledged by the Parties that Developer has relied on this number ofEmployee Housing Units and beds in calculating its tinancing for the Development, and therefore, the number of Employee Hausing Units azid beds shall nc�t be increased ar reduced by I3eveloper or the 1'awn Cvuncil at any time, except bv mutual written agreement of I�e��eloper and the Tawn. f. Parking fc�r tl�e Develapment shall be deternlined �ursuant ta the Vail Totivt� Cc�de. g. At no time shall the Development eliminate access to ar thc ability to safely occupy or operate the Timber Ridge housing units currently existing on the real pmperty adjacent to the Propertv, as mare particularly described on Exhibit B, attached hereto and inc�rporated herein by this reference (the "Adjacent Property"}. h. The Town shall refund all amounts paid by Developer for the Tawn's construetion and building materials use tax applicable ta the Property within ten (1 Q) days af the Tawn's receipt thereal: i. The To��rn agrees to waive all demalition and huilding pernzit fees f:or permits issued by the Town in connection �vith the Development. j. The Towrz sl�all impose typical and custornary pl�n review fees for review� of all plans for the Property, and Developer shall be responsible for payment of such fees as required by Tawn regulations. k. The Town shall use its best effarts to help Developer obtain an exem�atic�n from pro�erty taxes far the Development from all taxing authorities. Ta the extent ihe r � �� iraot�� C.':ICX)(:'1:?�i1�'-l1tLt�ll2FILC}CAGS-1iTE�i9PL:1'GRPt�'IS'E''.�Ir4fl�EX RtL){iF'PRk'-DI.�I h.DOC �R + ¢ ~ � � Property is not tax-exempt, ihe Town shall retund any pr�perty taxes, net of the Eagle � County Treasurer's fee, cQllected by the To�r�n on the Fraperty vr improvements thereon. l. If' Developer wishes to use federal funds for th� Development, it shall be Developer's sole respousibitity to pracure such funds. m. Develo�er shall be responsible for canstructian af any public improvements necessary for the Development, including streets, sidewalks and utilities (including relacating the ga.s line cunenYly Ic�cated in the Fronta�e Road); provided, however, the To�vn shall reimburse Developer far the costs of the inapro�ernents to the Frontage Road required for the Development, including a deceleration Iane. The timing af such reiinbursement shail be addressed in the DIA. 3. Ground Lease Closin�. The Grouna Lease Closing shall occur within tliirty (30) days of tinal appraval of all of Devcloper's applications far the I�evelapment and satisfacti�n of all canditians for Development financing. If the "I'�wn c�r the Gorporation fails ta execute the Ground I,ease at the Graund Le�se Closing, the Developer shall be entitied to the remedies specifieci in Section 6 hereof. At the Ground Lease Closin�, tlle 'I�own, the Gorporation and the Deuel�per shall execute a deed restriction stating that {i) the Praperty shall include three hundred fif:ty-nine {359) Emplo�ee Ilousing Units capable of housing fiti�e hundred seventy (570) emplc�yee beds in perpetuity, unless the number of beds or E�nplUyee Hausing Units is modified by muCual agreement af the parties pursuant to Section 2.e. hereof; and (ii) such beds may be leased to nc�n-employees in the et3ent not leased hy em�loyees, pursuant t� the terms of the Graund Lease. 4. Town and Corporation (�bli atg ions. a. During the tenn of�this Agreement, the Ta��rn and the Corporation shall work with Develaper and tl�►e Colarado I)epartment of i�ransportati�n ("GDOT"} to resolve roadway issues related ta thc Develapment. b. The Town and th� Corporation will cause an updated title cammitm�nt 1'or the Pr�perty and the Adjacent Property to be delitirered to llevelaper wiihin thirty (30) days ofthe date of this A�reement. Tl�e Town and the Corporati�n shall amend the deed restrictic�n currently existing on the Property to allow i-or the Devei�pmenl, and the Town shall issue a corrective deed to th�; Cozpora2ion removing the restrictive covenants existing on the Property. c. The Town and the Corporation shall grant to Devel�per, for the benefit o#�the Property, easements acrass the Adjacent Property t�hat are mutu�lly dzterrnined to be necessary for the Development; inciuding withaut limitation, utility, drainage, and access easements; provided, however, no sucll easements will have a material adverse effect an the aperatian of�th� Adjacent Prop�rty. d. Except as otherwise pxovided in this �lgreert�ent, the Town and the Corporation shall cause any existing liens and encun�brances Un the Property to be released in arder to facilitate Ueveloper's tinancing. '� 1 L`11JZ004 t':1DGC'GME-{:M�911tE�LC)C'AGS--I;T�'�ttP:,YPURI'WISE?TlA�BER RIGGE PRE-DIA 6:1)OC r� 1'he Town and the Corporation shall abtain tlle rel�ase of any mastcr lea�e an the I'roperty and deliver the I'roperty� free ofany ieases or parties in possession on the date oi� the Ground Lease Closing. f: "1'he T'o��Tn, Corporation and Deti��laper will negotiate and execute a cominereially reasanable form of Ground Lease which will reflect necessary provisions for IJeveloper's tinancing. g. "I'he Tati��n and ihe Corporation shali contribute t� Developer for purposes af the Develo��nent any tap fee credits attz•ibuted to tlie Prc�perty as of the Effectiv� Date af this Agreement. h. Within thirty (30) days ofthc Effective Date, the Town shall commission a study to determinc the total cost of the rock fall miti�ation necessary for the Development, and Devcloper shall reimburse the To�vn for fifty percent (50°fo) of the cost af such study c�rithin tcn (10) days af receipt of an invoice from the Totvn. The details regarding pa�nnent tor rock fall mitigation costs shall bc set forth in the DIA. . i, "I�he 'I'a�vn shall wai��e tr�if-fic impact fees associ�ted with the Development. j. If necessary, the Town shall subc�rdinate its exisiing indebtedness an the Property to the Ground I.�ease and constructi<7n fin�uicing foc the Develapment. k. The T�wn anel the Corporation shall negotiate in good f�iith urith Develc�per tar an exclusive o�tion to develop the Adjacent Property on terms similar to fhe final structure �f tliis Developrnent, to be more particu(arly set farth in a eoinmercially re�s�nable form of option agreement. The term of�such optian shall be five {;) years fram the issuance c�f�the frst certificate of �ecupancy far the Develc��znent. 1. The Town shall not amend applicable development stanciards, subdivision regulatians or zoning reguiatians in any ma�iner that has a material adverse ef%ct otz the scope or paramcters of the Development. 5. Due Dili e� nce. During thc term of this Agrcement, Developer shall conduct all du� diligence necessary to detcnnine �vhether the Property is suitable f'or the Development, at Develc�per's sole east. b. "Tcrm "1�ermination and Breach. a. "I'his Agreement shall corrimence upon th� Effectivc Date �nd terminate two (2} years thereaftcr, provided that eiiher Party may terminate this Agreement earlier than such date upan thirty (30) days �vritten notice to the c�tlier Yarties. b. In the ev�nt of a breach by a Party to this A�re�r�ient, the nan-breaching Party �vill provide tivxitten n�tice �f each breach to t}le breaching Party, and t}le breaching Party will have a period of thirty (30) c��ys from reccipt of suc11 natice in wl�ich tc� cure such br•each, provided that if such breach would reasoi�ably be e�pected to take langer than tlurty ( i0) a �n r, zr�o,v C:1pOCU�Y7�'-I iNIR /RE1GlX"f2LS�l17'!i'1k1P4XPGRFWLSF.'3TIMB�'R RIG�GE PRF.-DIA 6.�C)C . x + :� days ta cure, the breaching party rriay� hav� an additional period to cure as may be reasonably necessary, provided such cure is prarnptly comznenced and diligently prosecuted to campletic�n. c. In the event of an uncured breach by I7eveloper and a termina�tion of this Agreem�nt by t}ie `I'own or the Carporation as a result af such breach, Develaper shall I<�se the <�ption set f<7rth in Section 1 hereof, and the Ta��z and the Gorporation shall hati�e no further obligatian ta Developer. d. In the event o1' a termination of tt�is Agrcemc�nt due t� any of the following four events: (i) an uncured breach by the "I'own or the Car��aration; {ii) a termination by the Town ar the Corporatian witliout cause, (iii} the inability of �the TUwn to close on the Ground Lease; or (iv) a unilateral chanbe by the Town in the number of Fmployee I-iousing Units or beds tliat is nat agreed to by Develaper; the "I'own shatl reimburse Devzloper for its actual out-c�f-pocket exper�ses incurred for third-party consultants for arc:hitectural and engineering services in cannecti�n with the Development, incurred fram the Fffective Date thraugh the datr: of terniin�tion, uncured breach or the Ground Lease Closing, whichever occurs first, up to a maximum amcaunt of c�ne million dollars ($1,000,000), subject to the submission to the Tawn af'actual invoices provin� such costs. Such out-of-pack�t costs shall not include any fees for legal services ar salaries far any employees of Developer. 7. Costs. F.xcept as otherti�ise set forth llerein, each Party shall be responsible for its own ccrsts under this A�reecnent. $. Modifi4ation. This Agreement tnay only be modified by subsequent written a�reemerrt of the Parties. .9. Integr�tiori. T�iis Agreemeni c�nd �ny attached exhibits constitute �he entire Agreement between Devel�per and the Towrt, Superseding all prior oral ar vvritten c�n�n�uz�icatior�s. 10. Bindin�, Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upan and inurc to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respec:tive heirs, sueeessars and assigns. 11. Severabilitv. If any provisian of this Agrecment is deiernlined ta be void by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not altect any other provision hereof, and all of the other provisic�ns shall remain in full force and effect. If any provision of this Agreement is capat�le of two canstructions, one af which uf•ould render the pravision vaid, and the c�t}ier which woutd render the provision valid, then the pravision shall have the meaning which renders it valid. 12. Governin,� Law at�d Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State af Cc�lorado, and any legai action concernin� the provisions hereaf sha11 be brc��i�;ht in Eagle Caunty, Calaradc�. 13. ,�1ssi nment. There shall bc no tr�nsfer �r assig�lment of" ar�y of the rights or obligations of' Developer under this A�reernerlt with�ut the prior �4•ritten approval of the "I'own. l Ul ll70i19 C': �l?UC'Ul�/E� l iA�f.�/REiLOCALS—P�TEAxf''ut PGt2PPr I SG`�T/MBF_'R Rll?GE PRE-D!4 6.IaOC _ ___. . .... �_ � __._._._. ._ .� _.._. _ .. ..,. . _ _ �._ „,mee__ _�. . _ , _.. _.._. � __.�,._ . _. .,._ _ _... ..,_. __ _�� _ _ � � 14. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recarded in the real �state recards of Eagle County and shall be � eovenant runiling v�rith the 1'roperty. 15. Tit1e and Authoritu. Developer expres5ly wazTants and represents to tlle T�awn that tlle undersigned individuals have full p�wrer and authority to enter into this Agrcement. Developer and the undersi�ned individuals understan�i that the 1'c�wn is relying an such representation aiad warranty in entering into this A�reemcnt, 16. "I'hird Parties. There are na intended third-party benef:iciaries to this Agreement. l 7. Contin�ency; No I)ebt. f'ursuant to Article �, � 20 ofthe C�lorada Constitutian, an}� tinancial obligations of the 1�awn under this Agreement are specifically� contix�gent upon annual apprapriati�n af fuzids suflicient to perform such obligations. This Agreement shall never canstitute a debt ar obli�ation of the °I'own within any statutory or c�nstitutic�nal provisic�n. 18. No Joint Venture. Notwithstandin� atly pravision hereof, the To1��n shall neve�• be a joint venture in any private e�ltity or activity which �partici�p�tes �in this Agreement, and the Tc�wn shall never be liable c�r respansible for any debt or obligation of any participant in this Agreement. WHEREFORE, the parties hereta I�ave exec;uted this A�reement on the day and year first above �vritten. AT�'ES" : �,�, ��%""'-- ., _ L r ei onaldson, Tc�wm Clerk APPROVED A O F RM: `�' Ma Mire, "I'awn Aitc�rney � ~ TO OP VAIL, COI,ORf�DO t G�' St• .emler, T'own Manager r ifr �;?o�v C:4DQCUML•-1i,��h�IRF,�LQCALS-1i1E:iff�:�t'FC,RP3��15`F;7�7A18F.'X Rll)GL:' f'RG-PlA G.�OC , . � � � �," `` TIM$ER R.IDC'rE AI'FCJRTat��3LE H4USING cox��a �i�l�� y: �r �—�-- Name: �5 / L�. Its: c c� STATI: OF COI.ORADO ) � SS. COIINTY OT' ��,��€? ? The faregoing instrument was subscribed, swc�rn to, ar�d acknc��vledged b�fvre me this i i� day af �c�u�.ra•-�1r��..�' , 2Q09, by �,3"�.r-y G�'.�.tp-,�-" as the :.}�°�. �..; r,�j,�,,,,..,--�- of Timber Ridge Affordable Housing C�rporation. ,�� %ty corninis�ion expire�: p�,�2+-� � 2�+► t� ��.m'�„� t,,. �J�iC;;;�� `'�� ,,,•�A,� � � • . � � a} F � ) �' y�%* A�+(`•, 'i : ta�.�,,,,.�-- : �� }' Pu :;, : �G c��- :t.t�•,. P U�� ,'�"�' VAIL "I'IMk�EK kIDGi� L.�C=--- :. .� . frrf�'"��r��aOF �a��b�� BV: `°� . Name: �� t� � � � �-v.�r�sc� �� r Its: /?'J �,�� ,� �2-- � 1�"�� STAT� OF C�Hi,-@�2-�r�&- ) � SS. COUNTY OF' �~ ff�p.�� ) ('� The f'ot� oing instrument w�as subscribed, sw�orn tc�, and ackn�wled ed before me this 1�� day of r j� Q.�?'" , 2009, by ��Gv�' �f �.-r'� ��c�?c as thc �'1 C,�-n c� a�" ___ of Vail "I'imber Rid�e LLC. (S F A I,) My con�missic�n expires: �w,+�r. SOFIA CERECER£$ NOTAAY PUBCi� ! �(1 attd tpr if� Sidi@ ot T6%i5 ryw ►sAy COmmMaSl4ft 8ltpif+�f « c3a-i8-2Q13 t Ul UlfJ4A C: IUO(,"1!,1tE-11AlAflR�'tt.Ot;r11,S,. t 1TF��lF'1,4'i�GRP4Y'ISF=T1A4B6K RIUG� F'RF.`-UI>7 6.DC)�"' � � � �� t� ... .. b .,� �,. - �� b . . s � a e.�.. �..,.,� � .� , ��„ � � . � . . ... n tz. ti e., �� .�. � ��a�� ,,��fir ...�� . � � :� � � � « ' s "The Entire Parcet" LOTS t THROUGH 5, �1 RESUBDTVISION t1F�'LLON'S RII7GE Si7BI�NIS.IfJN BLOCK C A PART OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WES7' Ol� "17iE frth A.M, TO WN Of VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORAC?O "The Adjacent Property" Also knawn as Exhibit B � � � ¢Qy�l ti V�T' � �5 � h �� = •:� � d �4a�T Z � Q A� � �w � �� ». � � � �..� " ° 0 � F N� lAT t � Prm y � .�, �° s� � �--� Yy�� 8 ' �,� \ i.. �M"�""..w`i °w` � /' , �G',.� �v v�c e �'� � o uorw's � a�unrHSiar+ rxmc aa 2 � g (�c. No. i2�rc) � � . ,d,.. .... . � �� °� v ,.�.:. ,> nJiqlkT - �'rn.s6• ��.r, . a'nw arr� _ ,isv7r - n .� r�sc � aee.�r "'"."`_ i�i.��, TFNfXliT - iM7Y rsYYYxt Q1019 � J6].�6' 6' 6RU � M537S'00'E � � YI W'" \ 6Rif. .YY�lY � - ) _Y an�M+., l4�TY 8F4 � tlY]!iW � S % y n l f\ � �fi'iY. E.�.. a`t'^� s $/r� y• LOT � ✓ �,. �„ � � ��. 4- � f '� w' o�} �� ! �' ��. � � r� �`'.�s'��-�, �•�'•�•A' � �eP J � J' � �� CltMti[C SCn1,L^ . . . . .. « � �a � ,.... � ..... � .. . . �.. m�a . _.... . n�*...�„o-�»»�,w.,�.�.w.�* .. a.++az,.�.b..�3 ......o. . .. _-..�.m.....�.-m�„�, . . - ....,�...� / f,� � /`� 4 SAVOY NLLAS CONDONINWMS 53�9Y'31i - 433.4B' ( .. � �r� �Ne�R 1 l� •,�,A .� x ' aiY+4 � 5. (✓, •�- .. ar.M(' i� `�'"�---_ "The Property" Also known as Exhibit A '1°he pariies ta lhis Agrecmani hareby acknotvledge that this Erhibit shaws thc appmximare location of ti�e properry ime to be draum t�tween the Yroperty� anci the Adjucent Propert��, and Ihat ttus Exhibit wall he r�pluczd upun the `Pnwn'c �pproval af tlie sutuii� isi�n uf the entire parcel depictect aa tYus Nstribit The replaaemern exhibft shalt shnw the exnet lot ation of the pro�erty line hetween the Property aud the Adjacent Praperty, and shall particularly descritx aa[h separate parcel. � Eagle River Water & Sanitation District Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority Draft December 30, 2009 Developer Approval Process The following steps must be completed by a developer in order for the proposed development to receive service from the District's or Authority's water and wastewater systems. Work required in each step may (and likely will) occur concurrently with work in other steps. Pc-�ints where the District/�utht�rity'� ap�?roval procE�ss int��rFaces with the �ar�ci Use Autliority's appr�val proc�ss ��rc highlightecl in blue. Connection to the water and wastewater systems for service is accomplished through a separate business process which starts when a New Account Application is submitted by a Customer. First Contact • Staff works closely with Land Use Authorities (LUAs) so that the District is aware of new development proposals early in the developer's land use approval process. �Ut�s sencl a fic�rmal notification to the C�istri�tJA�rthc�rity that a r�ew proposed clevel��mei�t has s��I�mitt�ci a SI<Ftc_li Plan applicatiar�. Staff collects information about the developer and property, creates a file and tracking process. * Staff ineets with �UA ko cliscus�; i5sues/scl�eciul��%��pproval ��rt7cess interface points. • Linn reports project to Board along with developer's intent for conveyance of water rights (cash- in-lieu, water rights dedication, already covered under existing augmentation plan, combination of above) • Construction Review generates an Initial Letter to the developer outlining the District/Authority developer approval process Inclusion • District/Authority requires that new areas requesting service be included in the appropriate water and sewer service boundaries • The Construction Review Team (CRT) investigates status of inclusion into applicable service boundaries • Inclusion into the Authority service area is accomplished through the member metropolitan district (Marchetti's office is the contact) or the Town of Avon • Inclusion into the District requires application, a$1000 fee and Board approval • Once a property is included into the District boundary, an Inclusion Letter is generated and copied to tl�e LUt�, An inclusion letter states only that the property is now located within the boundary and does not commit the District to serve or address water rights issues Water Rights Dedication • Water rights dedication sufficient to serve the water uses of the proposed development or a cash payment in lieu of a water rights dedication (at Board discretion) must be made by the developer to obtain service. In some cases the water uses related to a proposed development or redevelopment may be covered by a dedication or augmentation plan already in place. . To determine whether a dedication is required, a proposed dedication is adequate, or a cash-in- lieu payment is acceptable, the developer submits required information which includes: 1) a water demand worksheet, 2) a request for cash-in-lieu payment or information describing the � water rights to be conveyed, and 3) $2000 deposit against the review fee. For complex reviews, 24053 a „ additional review fees may be required. District/Authority consultants review the submitted information, confirm the proposed water demand and evaluate whether the proposed water rights dedication is sufficient to serve the proposed development, or calculate the cash-in-lieu payment, and make a recommendation to the Board . Staff assembles information for a Board Action Request • Board approves/denies the application for water rights dedication or cash in lieu payment • If approved, staff and consultants will prepare a Water Rights Dedication Agreement between the District/Authority and the developer which will provide the terms of the dedication and the agreement to serve, and conditions under which a refund may be made and an expiration date of the agreement if water rights are not conveyed or payment made per the agreement. . The District/Authority will not sign e�ff on ��ny �rc�cF>ss of the I_UA neeelerl fot� the cleveloper ko obtain �levelc��r77eni rights (Prelirnir�ary Pla�� Ap�roval} prior to havinp w�ter� ri�hts issues resolvc>d. Resolution is defined as either: o A determination that no dedication is required; or o An executed Water Rights Dedication Agreement is in place. Infrastructure Approval • The developer and District staff ineet to discuss the project and Construction Plan Approval review process • The developer provides construction drawings, per the District's requirements. The drawings are reviewed by CRT. If deemed necessary, the CRT may require third party review by the District's system modeling and engineering consultants to determine the effect of the proposed connection and demand on the District's/Authority's existing infrastructure and plant capacity. The developer may be required to up-grade/modify existing infrastructure to accommodate the development and its impact on the system, at the developer's cost. • Staff will make a determination of whether the developer must dedicate treated water storage sufficient to serve the proposed development, or pay a Treated Water Storage fee in lieu of storage dedication • Once the construction plans are approved, including any upgrades/modifications to the existing system, and storage dedication is determined, CRT will provide a Construction Plan Approval Letter. This letter allows the developer to commence construction of the system. A Construction Plan Approval Letter will not be granted until all property to be served by the District/Authority is included and all water rights dedication issues have been resolved. • Once the system has been constructed per the construction plans and Construction Acceptance has been granted by the CRT, Customers wanting to tap into the District/Authority systems may submit a New Account Application to receive service. • Final Acceptance of the system is granted after a two-year warrantee period and completion of all Final Acceptance requirements. A Final Acceptance Letter is generated. • Staff Uvill work with LU�1s to ensure thf�t the d�vc�loper's Sul�ciivisioi7 Improverr�ent Agreement bond is not released until a Final Acceptance Letter is abtainerl by the developer. Conditional Capacity to Serve Letter • The LUA or a lending entity may request that the developer obtain an Ability to Serve Letter or otherwise commit to serve the development before the conditions to obtain an Ability to Serve � Letter can be met. In this case the District/Authority will issue a Conditional Capacity to Serve Letter 24053 r , ' ,� to the developer that states that the District/Authority is willing to serve the development if all conditions for an Ability to Serve Letter can be met. This letter does not commit the District/Authority to serve the development if the conditions cannot be met. Ability to Serve Letter . The �.Ut� may require the developer to obtain an Ak�ility to Serve �etter fram the District�Authori#y as a�.ondition �f obtaininp development ��i�hts for tfi� prc��osec! cfevelopment. Ability to Serve is not a District/Authority process or requirement for service, however the developer must meet the following conditions before an Ability to Serve Letter will be issued: o The property to be served must be included in the District/Authority o Water rights dedication issues must be resolved o The proposed water and wastewater infrastructure needed to serve the proposed development must obtain District/Authority Construction Plan Approval, which includes an analysis of the impacts the proposed development, water uses and wastewater demands will have on existing or future District/Authority infrastructure, treatment and system capacity, regulatory compliance, rates and water supplies. If the conditions for granting an Ability to Serve Letter are met, staff generates an Ability to Serve Letter, which 1) complies with new state legislation, 2) may contain conditions, and 3) states an expiration period. • Staff will wark with LUAs to ensure that the Ability to Serv� Letter, �s clefined herein, is � �wr+ condition for the LUA's granting of Preliminary Plan Approval or development rights • Staff will work with LUAs to ensure that compliance by the developer with all the canditions and requirements in the Water Rights Dedication Agreement and the Ability to Serve Letter are met as a condition of the �UAs Final Plat Appraval. • 24053 �� TAB-12-29-09.x1s NIT TABULATION NIT NAME UNIT TYPE NET ARE, 1 STUDIO 391 2 1 br/1 ba 527 3 1 br/1 ba 647 1-1ST 2br/2ba 782 1 2br/2ba 812 2 2br/2ba 893 2-TOP 2br/2ba 990 3-1 ST 2br/2ba 926 USE THIS SHEET UNIT COUNT 22 100 38 17 72 46 4 10 % 6.25% 28.41 °/ 10.80°/ 13.0 i 1.14 2.84 100.0% 12/2910' TOTAL NET % 8,602 1-BEDROOM 52.700 45.5% 24,586 13,294 2-BEDROOM 58,464 54.5% 41,078 3,960 9,260 41,667 UNIT AVERAGE NET SF : 720 ' NET AREA IS COMPUTED TO INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF ALL EXTERIOR FRAME WALLS THAT ENCLOSE A/C SPACE. IT DOES NOT INCLUDE PATIOS, BALCONIES, PATIOIBAICONY STORAGE. 'ROJEGT DATA NIT AVERAGE HUD SF : REQUIRED PROVIDED 720 S.F. 5.24 ACRES 67 UNITSIACRE 526 SPACES 540 SPACES ( 522 GARAGE; 18 SURFACE ) 1.53 SPACESIUNIT Page 1 � SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CALCULATIONS LOT AREA: 5.24 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: H (HOUSING) TOTAL UNITS: 352 DENSITY: 67 UNITS PER ACRE BUILDING HEIGHT: 5-STORY CLUBHOUSE: 4689 SF. BUILDING GROSS AREA: 305,400 SF. GARAGE GROSS AREA: 164,250 SF. PAVED AREA: 3,000 SF. PARKING & DRIVEWAYS: 31,308 SF. BUILDING COVERAGE: 94,100 SF. 41°/� SNOW STORAGE AREA: 10,600 SF. ( 30% PAVED AREA) LANDSCAPE AREA: 72,372 SF.1.66 ACRES ( 31% SITE AREA ) PARKING REQUIRED: 1.5 SPACES FOR UNITS LESS THAN 500 SF. 2 SPACES FOR UNITS MORE THAN 500 SF. TOTAL 693 SPACES REQUIRED WITHOUT REDUCTION TOTAL 520 SPACES REQUIRED WITH 25% REDUCTION ( 25% COMPACT CAR SPACES ALLOWED ) PARKING PROVIDED: GARAGE: 522 SPACES SURFACE: 18 SPACES TOTAL: 540 SPACES INCLUDING 106 COMPACT SPACES ( 19%), 12 HANDICAP SPACES ( 1.53 SPACES PER UNIT ) TYP. PARKING STALL: 9' X 19' (SURFACE); 9' x 24' ( PARALLEL) 9' X 18' ( GARAGE ) 8' X 16' ( COMPACT) TIMBER RIDGE VILLAGE APARTMENTS The Property • 10.08 acres • 16 two- and three-story buildings • 308 surface parking spaces • 198 two-bedroom, one bath apartments • Each apartment is 744 square feet • In August, 2007, the site was rezoned Housing from Special Development District # 10 which was previously 5 lots each zoned Residential Cluster The History • In 1979, Timber Ridge (previously Vally Hi) was approved as SDD #10 • The 198 units were required to be restricted as long-term employee rentals • The deed restriction was for a period of twenty years from the date of completion • The previous deed restriction expired in 2001 • In 2001, the Town entered into a"stand still" agreement with the then owner • The Town reviewed numerous options to ensure Timber Ridge perpetually remained affordable rental units o The Town established the Housing District for the purpose of applying it to this property • Ultimately, it was determined the most effective way to ensure the current use remained on the property was to purchase the property • In July, 2003, the Town paid $20,000,000 in a"friendly condemnation" • Taxable bonds were issued so the bonds could be called at any time to facilitate redevelopment • The Town deed restricted the property and immediately "re-sold" it to the Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation (a Colorado not-for-profit) o The deed restriction requires 600 affordable rental beds be maintained o Originally Town Council sat as the Board The Operation • Directed by the Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation Board o The Board is made up of: Town Manager, Community Development Director, Finance Director, Public Works Director, Facilities Manager • Managed by Corum Real Estate Group for $87,000 per year • All of the units now have one-year lease terms • Average monthly lease payment of $1350 per unit — will be $1,375 as of 10/01/08 • 188 of the units are master leased by local businesses o Vail Associates master leases 169 Units • Borne Engineering was hired to provide an overview of required capital maintenance of Timber Ridge o The report was presented to Town Council on August 21, 2007 ➢ The report identified $2,594,000 worth of repairs and replacement over seven years ■ This includes a complete replacement of all roofs and siding l�J i � �� . 0 A first phase of work, which included replacing deck railings, decking, posts and fences, was budgeted and completed in late 2007 and early 2008 ➢$240,000 was funded from cash flow to cover the cost The second phase of work which includes partial window replacement, painting, asphalt repair and re-sealing has been budgeted and will be completed in early summer, 2008 ➢$144,000 is budgeted to be spent from the replacement reserves Existing Debt • $19,025,000 variable rate senior revenue bonds o Current rate cap protection at 5.5% until May, 2008 ➢$45,000 is escrowed annually to purchase new rate cap protection o Letter of credit fee at 1.25% and remarketing fee at .125% annually o The payments are interest only until 2009 o The bonds have thirty-year term with a 23-year amortization of the debt o The Town has a moral obligation to back stop any debt service short fall ➢ The Town annually appropriates $925,000 from the Capital Projects Fund for this moral obligation o The bonds are "callable" at any time o Currently there are unfunded debt service reserves of $576,516 • $1,185,000 fixed rate revenue bonds o Originally borrowed $1,560,000 0 6.5% interest with a 10-year term •$1,900,000 note payable to the Town of Vail 0 1.5% interest rate with a 30-year term o The interest is accrued and no payments have been made to the Town o The Town originally loaned $1,000,000 at closing o An additional $900,000 has been loaned for mold remediation Current Budget • For 2008, the Board approved a budget that anticipates $347,181 in positive cash flow Net Income $ 18,368 Cash Flow Adjustments 328 813 Net Cash Flow $347,181 • Principal payments begin in 2009 with an initial annual payment of $405,000 Financial Overview .' �'OWNOFVAIL . 0 Timber Ridge Redevelopment _ From Strat work plann Staff: Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation (TRAHC) Summary: The TRAHC Board and the Town Council will establish goals, objectives and policies to guide the present operations and the potential redevelopment of Timber Ridge. Status: Negotiations with Lincoln Properties Southwest terminated in March 2008. At Council's direction, Timber Ridge Redevelopment Advisory Committee (TRRAC) was formed to develop guidelines for redevelopment and draft a Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFQ/P), which was issued on December 18, 2008. Ten responses were received and evaluated by a team consisting of the Vail Local Housing Authority, staff, and outside consultants. Vail Timber Ridge, LLC was recommended by the group and accepted by Council for further discussion and negotiation. Discussions are currently ongoing. Key Milestones: Q4 2008 Committee recommends request for Council — Completed. Q4 2008 RFQ issued — Completed. Q12009 Responses evaluated and developer negotiations — Completed Q2 2009. Q2 2010 Groundbreaking. qualifications (RFQ) to chosen for exclusive � �--�.-. --- -- - -- _- -- - --- — _ _ _ . -- __ ._ _ Pa e 1 (12/30/2009) George Ruther - Fwd: RE Timber Ridge existing water and sewer profiles � 9_ J � ... � _._ _.__ - -- - �_ __. .---- -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _� From: Tom Kassmel To: George Ruther; Greg Hall Date: 12/29/2009 5:07 PM Subject: Fwd: RE: Timber Ridge - existing water and sewer profiles FYI Thomas Kassmel, PE Town of Vail Department of Public Works Town Engineer 1309 Elkhorn D�ive �ail, CO 81632 Phone 970-479-2235 »> "Andy Strehler" <astrehlerC�erwsd.orq> 12/29/2009 5:04 PM »> Hi Tom, Generally we would be okay with the 30' easement so long as our utilities are within that easement plus additional space within the easement per District standards to allow access to excavate. Before we sign off on reducing size of easement we wili need to see the future layout for: structures, encroachments, drainage, and buildings. Andy Andy Strehler, P.E, CIP Division Manager Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (970)477-5446 From:Tom Kassmel [mailto:TKassmelCa�vailgov.coml Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:18 AM To: Andy Strehler Subject: Fwd: Timber Ridge - existing water and sewer profiles Andy Attached is the preliminary layout for Timber Ridge Utilities and the Fire Lane/pedestrian path. We would like to use these in a discussion about reducing the 40' easement to 30'. Can we still go on the Construction Review agenda tomorrow? I have Alpine revising the cross sections to show the proposed easement and other utilities and their clearances to the Water and sewer. Thomas Kassmel, PE Town of Vail Department of Public Works Town Engineer �, 1309 Elkhorn Drive - --- — -- __ __ -- _.. -- �_ _ '(12/30/2009) George Ruther - Fwd RE: Timber Ridge existing water and sewer profiles Page 2l �"'' ud�r, CO 81632 � u Phone 970-479-2235 »> "Gary Almgren" <almgren@alpinecivil.com> 12/29/2009 8:44 AM »> HiTom— Attached are PDF's showing profiles of the existing water and sewer. Please note that the sewer and water profiles are on different stationing. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Gary Almgren almc]ren@alpinecivil.com Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 PH: 970-926-3373 ext 225 FAX:970-926-3390 �� ,s� s� � n . �'` � . . _ _ .�J . _ /,. � , . _ ,_ ay..e� V �" v aK�- J` io.� �. o�t �_ 1V..�! �— �6 �Cn? oc�ti !.�- �� 6`�� << � rZ � f. � _ � L,� s. � � �� u�. � `�a.-�a,� • cou't � �`� �•J.�� S�'e.��.�'� Q�so�. V'�z�'lllet� ZZO � ao% co� �I �G�t � � � D � a�" �, o� � . � � y'I �%�/ 1/G f �/Yl S I'I • CG�/'I � �� J r �oRnAn CONSTRUCTION SERVKES December 22, 2009 George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail — Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Dear George, We are in receipt of your letter dated December l, 2009 containing the written summary of comments from the various departments, boards and councils regarding the Vail Timber Ridge redevelopment. Thank-you, for providing this summary of comments for our review. Our team will utilize and expand upon these comments in our design to better meet the needs and visions of the Town for their community. I look forward to more successful meetings and wark sessions soon. If you need anything further please let me know. Thank-you G�' ary "Lee" Thomas Jardan Construction Services 9639 Greenville Avenue Dallas Texas 75243 214.349.7900 9639 Greenville Avenue • Dallas, Texas 75243 • Z 14/349-7900 • Fax 21 4/349-791 0 w�nniv.cfjordan.com � _ k a, ." � ; , .� , �. .� ��>�� , ��, �. .:� , � , : Departrnent, o�.Cominunity Developmenfi:, ; =�' J �'�� ' � , ` � � ;75 Sauth Frontage Road � � ,� z �� ,, _�.. �$;�,� . °- Vail, Co.toraclo:�81�657• , ° , �� . ; _�; � � ' �:` �Tel 970-479 2'! 28r `, ,a . .. � : � � '`'� � `� ��',� �� : ` a �;. .� , _ 97U-4fi9 2452 _ �+� , � �♦��,� � =� ,�;;,�� , com , _ �s�;�ti�� , � p��o`. �n�tor .. _ � �� , . -- . r �. ��;wE - � r"-� �� -,� t .,...,,.,. w ,n.4-. +r r a »�r . f � �� . '4� , . .. + , .�, . . ..� a . �, . . . . . . � � * .. . _.,,. � _ ...x.._s..� �m:, . <, � � . .. . „ � } ;:� �` :�ax� , �; ��1►eb , :www:va�lgov °�ix�ent Review;Coord � '�� t -: .f .. Development Plan D Application for Review by the � Planning and Environmental Commi � �:/ � I� V 1.� ;nJAN 1 1 2010 Generai Information: This appiication is required for the establishment or the amen o��re+�+��N" ment plan. The establishment or an amendment of a development plan may be required for new mnstruction, c ange in use or redevelopment on parcels that are within the following Zoning Districts or as determined by the Administrator: General Use (GU) District (Section 12-9C, Vail Town Code), Ski Base/ Recreation (SBR) District (Section 12-8D, Vail Town Code) and Ski Base/ Recreation 2(SBR2) District (Section 1Z-8E, Vail Town Code). Sections of the Vail Town Code may be found on the Town website at www.vail oq v.com. The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Review Board and/or the Town Council. Fee: �$1500—Establishment of a development plan _$250—Amendment to an approved development plan Description of the Request' Development Plan approval in the Housing District for Timber Ridge Physica) Address' 1280 North Fronta e Parcel Number• 210312105008 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parce) no.) , Property Owner: Timber Rid e Afforable Mailing Address: 75 South Fronta e R Phone: 479-2144 Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: Vail Timber Rid�e LLC' Mailina Address: 7700 C.F. Jordan Dr. El P Phone: 915 877-3333 . ; ... For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth � Check # Fee Paid: �� 41_�: v� � Received From: �n Meeting Date: Z � a ��o PEC No.: . t' t��.�q dQ�� Planner: Zoning • • ' • �� Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Na�" a ,�.v �I° � c�,�� U„- i'f"l�A'� Ot � 1/l � T v r eX�lS'�'i��1.�') O1-5ep-09 J TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Apnlicant Vail Timber Ridge LLC 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive El Paso, Texas Architects Humphreys and Partners Architects 5339 Alpha Road Suite 300 Dallas, Texas Victor Mark Donaldson Architects 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard # 207 Avon, Colorado Civil En i�neer Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, Colorado Land Plannin� Pylman & Associates, Inc. 137 Main Street, C107W Edwards, Colorado u � 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Summary of Request 2,p Existing Conditions 2.1 Timber Ridge History 1 1 1 1 3.0 Proposed Plan 2 3.1 Project Description 2 3.2 Utilities 3 3.3 Detailed Zoning Analysis 3 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation 7 5.0 Summary 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 11 3 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Summary of Request The purpose of this application is to provide information relative to a request for Development Plan approval for the proposed re-development of 5.24 acres of the existing Timber Ridge apartments. Timber Ridge is located at 1280 North Frontage Road. The legal description for the property is Lots 1 thorough 5, a resubdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C, Town of Vail, C0. The Town of Vail Zoning map designates Timber Ridge as Housing District (H). Development within the Housing District must receive Development Plan approval in accordance with the parameters and review criteria described in Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code. This application contains the information required by Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code to review and approve this application. 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 The history of Timber Ridge Timber Ridge was constructed in 1981 and remains the largest employee housing complex in the Town of Vail. The ten-acre site includes 198 two bedroom, one bath rental units in 16 buildings. Each unit is 745 square feet in size. The Town of Vail purchased Timber Ridge for $20 million in July of 2003. In 2005 the town issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a redevelopment of the property. Corum Real Estate Group was selected through this RFP process but mutually acceptable terms were not successfully negotiated. In July of 2007, anticipating a redevelopment of the property, the Town rezoned Timber Ridge to the Housing (H) District. In 2007 the town received an unsolicited redevelopment proposal from Open/Hillwood that was related to ongoing negotiations regarding redevelopment of the Lionshead Parking Structure. The discussions regarding Timber Ridge were terminated in March 2008. In December of 2008 the Town issued a new Request for Proposals seeking interested and qualified development teams to redevelop approximately one half of the property. This process led to the selection of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � team. A development agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Timber Ridge LLC was entered into in October of 2009. The development agreement stipulates a redevelopment of the eastern half of the ten acre site and requires Vail Timber Ridge LLC to deliver 359 EHU's capable of housing a total of 570 beds. 3.0 Proposed Plan 3.1 Project Description The Vail Timber Ridge LLC team has a tremendous amount of residential housing construction experience. The members of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC team have been involved in the construction of over 70,000 units of residential, student and military family housing across the country. The VTR LLC team has taken the town's goals of creating a significant employee housing project on the Timber Ridge site to heart and have worked diligently to meet the town's density goals while designing a very livable and attractive building. The proposed design for Timber Ridge includes 352 apartments, a 522 car parking garage and a 4,689 square foot resident's clubhouse. The building form is defined by the long rectangular shape of the site and is centered on the iive story 522 space-parking garage. The garage entrance is approximately mid-point of the proposed building and the garage footprint is a relatively efficient 120' x 267' layout. The ground level of the garage will include trash facilities, bike storage, a mailroom and a large area of individual storage units. Each successive level of the garage will include trash disposal facilities and bicycle storage. The ground level and next three levels of parking are fully enclosed. The garage ramps up to an open air Sth level of parking. The 352 apartments are arranged in three separate but connected buildings. The separation of the buildings allows a complete wrap of three sides of the parking garage and also allows the buildings to step with the vertical grade changes of the site. The east building is a double loaded corridor courtyard design. The building ranges from three to five story elements as it wraps around the courtyards and extends on an east-west axis to abut the parking garage. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �,n The center building consists of a five story element of apartments running along the 270 feet of the front fa�ade of the garage. The rooflines and roof pitch of these units varies to create a townhouse type of appearance to this front elevation. An enclosed hallway between the parking garage and the units provides access to each apartment on each level. � The west building is a similar courtyard double loaded design as the east building. Extending from the garage the building continues on an east west axis with two prominent courtyards in a five story form. While the site constraints and building program shape the overall building form, great care has been to introduce horizontal and vertical design elements that break down the building mass and scale and provide visual interest. A variety of rooflines and roof pitches, varied window placements and a variety of materials all add to the overall design concept. 3.2 Utilities Water and sanitary sewer mains are located adjacent to or on the site and appear to be adequate to serve the proposed buildings. Alpine Engineering, Inc. is the project civil engineer and will work closely with town staff and the utility service providers to ensure appropriate utility connections are designed and implemented. Natural gas, television and telephone services are all available at the site. 3.3 Detailed Zoning Analysis The Housing District is intended primarily to provide for employee housing development opportunities. Due to the nature and characteristics of employee housing a housing oriented zone district was specifically developed and adopted into the Vail Land Use Code. The stated intent of the Housing District is to ensure that employee housing is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air and open spaces. A. Permitted Uses The only use proposed by the application is Employee Housing Units, which is a Permitted Use in this zone district. The other uses on site, parking and a 4,689 square foot clubhouse are support uses to the primary permitted use. The clubhouse will serve residents of the Timber Ridge complex and will not be open to outside memberships. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � B. Conditional Uses There are no conditional uses proposed by this application. C. Setbacks The required setback is the Housing District is twenty feet (20') from the perimeter of the zone district. The proposed plan meets and exceeds this setback requirement. D. Site Coverage The Housing District allows for maximum site coverage of fifty-five percent (55°/o) of the total site area. At the discretion of the Planning Commission this site coverage maximum may be increased if seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking spaces are underground or enclosed. Although the proposed Timber Ridge development plan meets this parking goal, there is no request to increase the maximum allowable site coverage. The site coverage of the proposed plan is 94,100 square feet, which measures to forty one percent (41 %) of the 5.24-acre site. E. Landscaping and Site Development The Housing District requires at least thirty percent (30%) of the total site area to be landscaped. The proposed plan includes a landscape area measured at 72,372 square feet, which equals thirty one percent (31 %) of the site area. F. Parking and Loading The Housing District, in recognition of the unique nature and characteristics of employee housing, allows for, at the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, a reduction in the parking requirements outlined in Chapter 10 of the Vail Land Use Code. This reduction is based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than required by Town Code. The applicant fully understands that Timber Ridge must be a fully functional project and that the parking must work for the residents. The design of the project includes a parking count that the applicant believes will more than adequately � meet the needs of the residents. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � The design of the parking at Timber Ridge, with 522 parking spaces provided in the parking garage, allows for efiicient management of access control. All cars will be registered with the management company and provided with an authorization sticker. Garage access will be controlled by a key card or similar control system. This will ensure that parking is made available for residents and will eliminate "poaching" of parking by outside users. The parking standards of the Town Code are, by nature, a generalist set of standards. Within the Village and LionsHead core areas parking is set at 1.4 spaces per residential unit. All areas of town outside of these core areas fall under Parking Schedule B. The parking requirement under Parking Schedule B for multiple family units is 1.5 spaces per each unit under 500 square feet and 2 spaces per unit for units between 500 and 2000 square feet. This standard is applied across the board, regardless of whether the units are in a triplex or in a 150 unit complex, is irrespective of location, proximity to transit or walkability to community services, and applies to units that may be seasonally occupied, used as full-time residences, used as vacation rentals or as second homes. The Housing Zone District was written in a manner that understands that these generalist standards may not be particularly applicable and allows for variations in these standards. As this is a site that is designed for local worker rental housing we can assume that most tenants will work within the Town of Vail geographic footprint. And it should be fair to assume that some tenants will be seasonal, some annual and some may live there for several years. But we can also assume that it is unlikely that a tenant will live there for the long term. It is unlikely that a child will enter pre-school and graduate from high school while living at Timber Ridge. Tenants on a short term basis (even a few years) may have little need for multiple car ownership. Timber Ridge is located within 9/10 of a mile from a grocery store, a hardware store, a sporting goods stare, other retail shops, restaurants and bars. Timber Ridge is also located within 8/10 of a mile from the Lions Head I-70 Overpass, which provides access to all of Lions Head. These distances are well within comfortable walking distance for a fit and active population. Timber Ridge is a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). There is an existing bus stop at Timber Ridge and the proposed design includes an improved bus stop area that will allow for additional buses to serve Timber Ridge. The Town of Vail and ECO Transit bus systems both serve Timber Ridge. Timber Ridge residents can easily access any and all services within the Town of Vail, (social, medical, educational, government, employment, shopping, recreation) and via the ECO Transit system may utilize transit to visit down valley locations. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � A key tenet of Transit Oriented Development is high density and a reduction in parking demand. Walkability and TOD are considered key factors to sustainable development. A speaker at a recent Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute land use/sustainability conference stated " In Europe land use and transportation planning strives to house and transport people. In America we strive to house people and their cars and strive to transport their cars." Timber Ridge is an example of a project that by virtue of its location, its target resident demographic and the high quality Town of Vail transit system, can fully function with a reduced parking standard. If we are to create sustainable, transit oriented development we must, as a society, discourage automobile use and encourage and enable walkability and transit opportunities. This is not inconsistent with recent Town of Vail policies to encourage local residents to use alternatives to peak season parking use of the Village and LionsHead Parking Structures. Town of Vail bus ridership has been experiencing significant growth, perhaps as a result of these parking policies. The parking requirement for Timber Ridge is detailed in Parking Schedule B of the Vail Town Code. Parking Schedule B requires 1.5 parking spaces for residential units of less than 500 square feet and 2 parking spaces for units between 500 and 2,000 square feet in size. The parking requirements for the 352 units are as follows: 22 units (less than 500 square feet) x 1.5 spaces per unit = 33 spaces. 330 units (between 500 — 2,000 square feet) x 2 spaces per unit = 660 spaces This totals a parking requirement of 693 spaces. The proposed plan includes 522 parking spaces in the garage and 18 surface spaces for a total of 540 spaces. This equates to an average of 1.53 parking spaces per unit. The applicant is requesting a reduction in the parking standards of approximately 22%. G. Other Development Standards In the Housing District the development standards of lot area and site dimensions, building height and density control shall be as proposed by the applicant, as prescribed by the planning environmental commission. A. Lot area and site dimensions This application proposes redevelopment of a part of Lot 2 and all of Lot 3, 4 and 5, a subdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C. This �` entails 5.24 acres of the approximately 10-acre Timber Ridge site. �w 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � The site is 885 feet in length along the North Frontage Road and is 233 feet deep at its east end and approximately 300 feet deep at the western boundary. A lot line adjustment to Lot 2 will be completed prior to construction on the site. B. Building Height The proposed building includes 3,4 and 5 story elements and steps vertically with the side grade on both the east-west and north-south axes. The highest ridgeline measures at 76 feet, 9.5 inches above grade with several architectural projections extending above this height. The rear five story element measures at 70 feet, 10.5 inches above grade. C. Density Control In October of 2009 Timber Ridge LLC and the Town of Vail entered into a development agreement that outlines the parameters of the proposed redevelopment of the 5.24-acre portion of Timber Ridge. This agreement stipulates a density of 359 Employee Housing Units capable of housing 570 beds. Minor changes in building massing and height have resulted in a minor density reduction to this number. The density proposed by this application is 352 Employee Housing Units. 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation The Housing District describes six criteria that shall be used by the staff and planning and environmental commission as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. Those criteria and the applicant's response to each follows below: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. Applicant's response: The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is located between the North Frontage Road and Lion's Ridge Loop in West Vail, with all site access via North � Frontage Road. This general stretch of the North Frontage Road is, in 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �. general, home to the largest concentration of large buildings in the West Vail region. � East of Timber Ridge is the relatively large Vail Run and Simba Run buildings. Immediately west of these buildings, adjacent to the east boundary of the proposed redevelopment parcel is the smaller scale Savoy Villas. West of Timber Ridge is the US Post Office facility, the site of the recently approved Roost Lodge redevelopment and the large scale Vail Commons, City Market, Safeway and West Vail Mall Buildings. Timber Ridge has several attributes that make the site appropriate for high-density housing. Direct access off the North Frontage Road removes any traffic impact from secondary streets and smaller scale residential neighbarhoods. This same attribute allows for extremely efficient and high intensity transit service. The site is centrally located to allow reasonable walking distance to both Lionshead and the West Vail commercial district. The hillside behind Lions Ridge Loop is too steep to allow development so there are no immediate neighbors to the north and no view impacts to any other residential properties. Savoy Villas, located just east of Timber Ridge is oriented toward views to the south, over I-70 and to the southeast towards Vail Mountain. Timber Ridge is one of the very few sites in town available for high- density employee housing that can take advantage of these attributes. The building architecture has been carefully designed to reflect the characteristics of the general historic and current trends of mountain design. In addition the building incorporates multiple design elements that mitigate the mass and length of the building. The courtyard design allows for significant interplay of the horizontal elevation of the street frontage while completely eliminating the visual impact of a 529 car parking garage. The varied building heights of the courtyard elements and the varied aspect, pitch and style of roof elements create the appearance of smaller building forms. Timber Ridge LLC believes the proposed design is an appropriate and positive expression of the desired density is fully compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �, B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. The proposed Timber Ridge plan proposes buildings and improvements that have been specifically designed to produce a functional development plan. The significant amount of required parking has been hidden from public view yet is an extremely functional and convenient facility for the residents. Unit access and pedestrian circulation is primarily within the enclosed building. Unit floor plans are efficient and extremely livable. A nearly 5,000 square foot clubhouse provides an amenity for the residents. The site itself, as discussed elsewhere in this application, may be the best available high density residential employee housing opportunity in the Town of Vail. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is currently home to 198 two-bedroom apartment units in 16 buildings, with extensive surface parking and site retaining walls. The proposed redevelopment site of 5.24 acres includes 106 of those existing units. The existing development has already impacted the original natural features of this site. The proposed plan does maximize opportunities for access and use by the resident public by the design of the courtyard spaces. The courtyard design performs the dual function of providing a significant break in the front fa�ade of the building and also, in response to this criterion, provides a location for functional and aesthetic public spaces. The courtyards have varied landscape design themes that include a plaza for intimate public gathering spots, barbecue and fire pit areas and hot tubs. The work session format with the planning and environmental commission, along with staff input, has resulted in revisions to the project that are extremely beneficial to the landscape design. Previous plans included a 24-foot wide driveway with parallel parking spaces all along the front of the building. This resulted in a significant � width of asphalt and a difiicult landscape design problem. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � The current plans have reduced this large expanse of asphalt to a 20 foot wide combined bike path and emergency vehicle access lane. This change in vehicular circulation had opened up more area available for landscape planting and results in a much improved landscape design. The grading at the north elevation of the building has also been revised. The back wall of the parking garage will now serve as part of the retaining wall system. This allows the entire back wall of the parking garage to be filled to the road grade. A level landscape area now exists between the garage and Lion's Ridge Loop and significant landscape planting has been incorporated into the plans. This eliminates the unsightly rear wall of the garage and creates a 270 foot long landscape island that will serve to visually separate the east and west wings of the building. Overall the landscape design represents a tremendous improvement over existing conditions and provides a very functional and meaningful open space and landscape design. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efiicient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. Timber Ridge is located along the North Frontage Road and the town bicycle and pedestrian path has been designed to pass through the site on Timber Ridge property. The bike path through the site is designed as a 20-foot wide path that will also serve as an emergency vehicle access. Sidewalks along the building provide access to all entryways and connect to the bike path and to the adjacent bus stop. Vehicular access and circulation is direct and efficient. The North Frontage Road will be improved with acceleration and deceleration turn lanes at the primary vehicular access to the parking garage. Cars will enter the site and directly access the centrally located parking garage. A second vehicular access is shared with the bus stop and provides access to the remainder of the existing Timber Ridge units and to 18 surface parking spaces that will serve short term, business office and drop off needs. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan io � A full environmental impact report has been completed for the proposed project and evaluated as a part of the design process. The recommend mitigation measures include improvements to the North Frontage Road to allow for appropriate turning movements and several alternative rockfall mitigation options. The applicant and the Town of Vail will work together towards the iinal design and implementation of these mitigation measures. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other application plans. The Timber Ridge site has been the largest employee-housing complex in Vail since its construction in 198L The Vail Comprehensive Plan and all of the other applicable long range planning documents and guiding documents recognize this land use as appropriate in this location. A necessary criterion for the 2007 re-zoning of the property to the Housing District was compliance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan and all other applicable plans. This positive re-zoning action serves as affirmation of the proposed land use. This application for redevelopment of approximately half of the existing Timber Ridge complex does not represent a change in land use, but is a change in the physical arrangement and intensity of that existing land use. As such, this application remains in full compliance with all applicable Town of Vail comprehensive planning documents. 5.0 Summary The Town of Vail has determined, through the 2008 Employee Housing Strategic Plan, that the policy of the Town of Vail will be "To ensure there is deed restricted housing for at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of Vail. This goal will be met by policies and actions that (1) ensure new development keeps up with this goal , and (2) development projects sponsored by or in partnership with the Town to "catch up" to meet this 30% goal. The Town has initiated several actions. The buy down program has added five units and the Arosa Drive duplex will provide a great ownership opportunity to two local families. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan m � But to really make progress in the "catch up" arena a development of significant density is necessary. The Timber Ridge site has the physical and locational attributes to allow for this site to be the best opportunity for the Town of Vail to create a significant increase in deed restricted beds within the community. Vail Timber Ridge LLC believes that we have addressed the program request of the Vail Town Council with a building and site design that is appropriate to the location and the neighbarhood and meets all of the criteria required for Housing District Development Plan approval. This proposed redevelopment of a portion of Timber Ridge will provide a tremendous community beneiit. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 12 . TIMBER RIDGE ADiACENT OWNERS LIST SAVOY VILLAS CONDOMINIUMS -see attached list Overlook at Vail Homeowners Association c/o Slifer management 143 East meadow Drive Suite 360 Vail CO 81657 Briar Patch LLC c/o Brice A. Tondre 228 Columbine Lane Evergreen CO 80439 Town of Vail 75 S Frontage Road Vail CO 81657 '' United States Postal Service Joal Hormann Real Estate Division WE 330 San Bruno, CA 94099 Don and Mary Elliman 5545 S Madison Way Greenwood Village CO 80121 Michael Sylvester & Sarah Nash 898 Park Avenue NY NY 10021 Thomas & Kay Pitcher PO Box 2051 Vail CO 81658 � U �` ��-�, .,�.....�.___.,Y,,,� ��f-��- .� ..____-____--__ � � � II �� c'. D JAN 1 1 201(1 �'�!i\l� .�'`i� i/AlI.. Sarah J Kumagai Revocable Trust Sarah J Kumagai, Trustee 6327 Timber Trail Edina MN 55436 Gregory & Christine Moffet 1655 Aspen Ridge Road Vail CO 81657 Nancy Kazarian 3154 Shoreline Drive Clearwater FL 34620-1736 Alexandra Mastriana-Solal Revocable Trust 1500 N Federal Highway Ft. Lauderdale FL 33304 L-0 Vail Holding 555 17th Street Suite 3600 Denver CO 80202 Cascade Club LTD 555 17th Street Suite 3600 Denver CO 80202 Vail Parking LLC 2990 Booth Creek Drive Vail CO 81657 Westhaven Condominiums c/o Don MacLachlan Vail Cascade 1300 Westhaven Drive Vail CO 81657 Liftside Condominiums c/o Don MacLachlan Vail Cascade � 1300 Westhaven Drive Vail CO 81657 Overlook at Vail Homeowners Town of Vail .Briar Patch LLC Association c o Brice A. Tondre 75 S Frontage Road / c/o Slifer management Vail CO 81657 ��3 Columbine Lane 143 East meadow Drive Suite 360 . �rgreen CO 80439 Vail CO 81657 United States Postal Service Thomas & Kay Pitcher Don and Mary Elliman Joal Hormann 5545 S Madison Way PO Box 2051 Real Estate Division WE 330 Vail CO 81658 Greenwood Village CO 80121 San Bruno, CA 94099 Sarah J Kumagai Revocable Trust Michael Sylvester & Sarah Nash L-0 Vail Holding Sarah J Kumagai, Trustee 555 17th Street Suite 3600 898 Park Avenue 6327 Timber Trail Ny, NY 10021 Denver CO 80202 Edina MN 55436 Alexandra Mastriana-Solal Revocable Trust 1500 N Federal Highway Ft. Lauderdale FL 33304 Cascade Club LTD 555 17�' Street Suite 3600 Denver CO 80202 L._�side Condominiums c/o Don MacLachlan Vail Cascade 1300 Westhaven Drive Vail CO 81657 � Nancy Kazarian 3154 Shoreline Drive Clearwater FL 34620-1736 Vail Parking LLC 2990 Booth Creek Drive Vail CO 81657 Gregory & Christine Moffet 1655 Aspen Ridge Road Vail CO 81657 Westhaven Condominiums c/o Don MacLachlan Vail Cascade 1300 Westhaven Drive Vail CO 81657 SAVOY VILLAS OWNER LIST MOHANNAD & RANA MALAS FAMILY TRUST MOHANNAD & RANA MALAS TRUSTEES 31591 BLUFF DR LAGUNA BEACH, CA 9265 CONKLIN, JOHN J., JR 63 WARDELL AVE RUMSON, NJ 07760-1036 LOYD-LAWTON FAMILY LP LLLP 660 LINDEN AVE BOULDER, CO 80304 AVANTI REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC 274 W WESLEY RD NW ATLANTA, GA 30305 MARTINO, JOHN 1564 W OGDEN AVE NAPERVILLE, IL 60540 DESPORTES, WILLIAM A. & KATHRYN A. PO BOX 4826 EDWARDS, CO 81632 VILLA 4-4 LLC 11786 W 53RD PL ARVADA, CO 80002 ROMANO, MARIA 1230 LIONSRIDGE LP 2B VAIL, CO 81657 HARTMANN, PETRA N. PO BOX 5091 � VAIL, CO 81658 SILFEN, FREDERICK R. & STEFANIE F. 6647 BRISTOL LAKE S DELRAY BEACH, FL 33446 SAUSSY, BRENDA JOYCE 2 E 50TH SAVANNAH, GA 31405 BOONE, CHERYL A. & CHARLES F. 73 MCCANN DR OTTSVILLE, PA 19942 MIRANDA, GREGORY Q. 1200 LIONS RIDGE LP 5D VAIL, CO 81657 MARTOS, FERNANDO HUMBERTO TORRE - HERAS DE TORRE, MA DEL ROCIO JUSTINA 2077 N FRONTAGE RD STE D VAIL, CO 81657 � J � �U COX, ROBERT D., JR 1200 LIONS RIDGE LP 5B VAIL, CO 81657 }" ...-.." MARTOS, FERNANDO HUMBERTO TORRE - HERAS DE TORRE, MA DEL ROCIO JUSTINA 2077 N FRONTAGE RD STE D VAIL, CO 81657 ROSALIE & PETER NEMETH REVOCABLE TRUST 91 BLUE HERON DR GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80121 EDWARDS, WILLIAM H., JR & LISA NEAL 1220 LIONS RIDGE LOOP UNIT B VAIL, CO 81657 LLEWELLYN, LINDA D. 1220 LIONS RIDGE LOOP 3C � VAIL, CO 81657 ALLISON, ROBERT H. 3200 CHERRY CREEK DR S DENVER, CO 80209 YURGLICH, ROBERT & LISA 6035 S CHESTER WAY GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 BUSCH, YEVETTE - BLAUROCK-BUSCH, ELEONORE 4323 APPLE WAY BOULDER,C080301 MULHOLLAND, TODD & MARY 1210 LIONS RIDGE LP 4C VAIL, CO 81657 PATTERSON, MATTHEW R. 547 BROADWAY 3 NEW YORK, NY 10012 u CONKLIN, JoxN J., JR 63 WARDELL AVE RUMSON, NJ 07760-1036 AVANTI REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC 274 W WESLEY RD NW ATLANTA, GA 30305 VILLA 4-4 LLC 11786 W 53RD PL ARVADA, CO 80002 COX, ROBERT D., JR 1200 LIONS RIDGE LP 5B VAIL, CO 81657 EDWARDS, WILLIAM H. JR & LISA NEAL 1220 LION'S RIDGE LOOP UNIT B VAIL, CO 81657 YURGLISH, ROBERT & LISA 6035 S CHESTER WAY GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 PATTERSON, MATTHEW R 547 BROADWAY 3 NEW YORK, NY 10012 BOONE, CHERL A. & CHARLES F. 73 MCCANN DR OTTSVILLE, PA 19942 � MOHANNAD & RANA MALAS FAMILY TRUST MOHANNAD & RANA MALAS TRUSTEES 31591 BLUFF DR LAGUNA BEACH, CA 9265 MARTINO, JOHN 1564 W OGDEN AVE NAPERVILLE, IL 60540 ROMANO, MARIA 1230 LIONSRIDGE LP 2B VAIL, CO 81657 MARTOS, FERNANDO HUMBERTO TORRE-HERAS DE TORRE, MA DEL ROCIO JUSTINA 2077 N FRONTAGE RD STE D VAIL, CO 81657 LLEWELLYN, LINDA D 1220 LION'S RIDGE LOOP UNIT 3C VAIL, CO 81657 BUSCH, YEVETTE-BLAUROCK-BUSCH, ELEONORE 4323 APPLE WAY BOULDER,C080301 SILFEN, FREDERICK R. & STEFANIE F 6647 BRISTOL LAKE S DELRAY BEACH, FL 33446 MIRANDA, GREGORY Q 1200 LION'S RIDGE LOOP 5 D VAIL, CO 81657 LOYD-LAWTON FAMILY LP LLLP 660 LINDEN AVE BOULDER, CO 80304 DESPORTES, WILLIAM A. & KATHRYN A. PO BOX 4826 EDWARDS, CO 81632 HARTMANN, PETRA N. PO BOX 5091 VAIL, CO 81658 ROSALIE & PETER NEMETH REVOCABLE TRUST 91 BLUE HERON DR GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80121 ALLISON, ROBERT H 3200 CHERRY CREEK DR S DENVER, CO 80209 MULHOLLAND, TODD & MARY 1210 LION'S RIDGE LP 4C VAIL, CO 81657 SAUSSY, BRENDA JOYCE 2 E 50T" SAVANNAH, GA 31405 ' ' .� H � 4 � ' E nvi ron mental I m act Report p Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project Eagle County, Colorado prepared for.• Vail Timber Ridge, LLC c/o Jordan Construction Services, 9639 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75243 prepared by.• Western Ecological Resource, Inc. 711 Walnut Street, Boulder, CO 80302 )anuary 2010 � , � Table of Contents Section / Title P� 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Environment ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Hydrology ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.1 Surface Water ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.2 Ground Water ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Atmosphere ..................................................... 1 ............................................................................. 2.3 Geology & Hazards ....................................................... 1 ............................................................... 2.3.1 Geology ................................................... 1 .............................................................................. 2.3.2 Hazards .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.5 Vegetation Resources .................................................................................................................... 4 2.6 Wildlife Resources ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.7 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2.8 Visual Resources ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.9 Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.10 Circulation & Transportation ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 1 Population .................................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Proposed Project .......................................................... 5 .................................................................... 3.1 Apartment Buildings ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Parking Garage ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.3 Clubhouse .................................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Impacts & Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 5 4.1 Hydrology ..................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1.1 Surface Water ......................................................................................................................... 5 4.1.2 Groundwater .......................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Atmosphere .................................................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Geology & Hazards ...................................................................................................................... 6 4.3.1 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 6 4.3.2 Hazards .................................................................................................................................. 6 4.4 Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 8 4.5 Vegetation Resources .................................................................................................................... 8 4.6 Wildlife Resources ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.7 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 8 4.8 Visual Resources ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.9 Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 8 4.10 Circulation & Transportation ....................................................................................................... 8 4.1 1 Population .................................................................................................................................. 9 5.0 Cumulative & Long-term Effects & Irreversible Environmental Changes ............................................ 9 5.1 Hydrology .....................................................................................................................................9 5.1.1 Surface Water ......................................................................................................................... 9 5.1.2 Ground Water ................................................. 9 ....................................................................... 5.2 Atmosphere .................................................................................................................................. 9 5.3 Geology & Hazards ...................................................................................................................... 9 5.4 Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 9 5.5 Vegetation Resources .................................................................................................................... 9 5.6 Wildlife Resources ........................................................................................................................ 9 5.7 Noise .......................................................................................................................................... 10 5.8 Visual Resources ......................................................................................................................... 10 5.9 Land Use .................................................................................................................................... 10 I ' 5.10 Circulation & Transportation ..................................................................................................... 10 5.11 Population .............................................. 10 .................................................................................. 6.0 Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 11 7.0 Photos ............................................................................................................................................ 24 8.0 References ...................................................................................................................................... 27 Appendix A. Correspondence from Nancy Chick, CDPHE .................................................................. 28 � . � � , , List of Figures Number / Title Figure 1. Project Location Map ......................................... Figure 2. Aerial Photograph of Existing Development....... Figure 3. Regional Geology Map ...................................... Figure 4. Project Area Geology Map ................................. Figure 5. Avalanche Hazard Map . ................................... Figure 6. Debris Flow Hazard Map .................................. Figure 7. Rockfall Hazard Map ........................................ Figure 8. Floodplains and Floodways Map . ..................... Figure9. Soil Map . .......................................................... Figure 10. Architectural Site Plan ..................................... Figure 11. Front Elevation ................................................ Figure 12. Conceptual Rockfall Mitigation Options......... .............. .............. ............. � List of Tables ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... . ........................ . ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... Number / Title Table 1. Ambient Air Concentration Estimates, Timber Ridge Project.... List of Photos Page .................. 12 .................. 13 .................. 14 ................... 15 ................... 16 ................... 17 ................... 18 ................... 19 ................... 20 ................... 21 ................... 22 ................... 23 Page ...... 2 Number / Title Page Photo 1. The steep slope presents a severe rockfall hazard. (11/25/09) ............................................... 25 Photo 2. A portion of the site is mapped as a High Severity Rockfall Hazard Zone. (11/25/09). ......... 25 Photo 3. Ornamental landscaping surrounds the existing Timber Ridge buildings. (11/25/09). .......... 26 Photo 4. Slope between the existing buildings and Lion's Ridge Loop Road. (11/25/09) .................... 26 � 1.0 Introduction Vail Timber Ridge, LLC has plans to redevelop the eastern 5.24 acres of the existing Timber Ridge affordable housing development located at 1280 N. Frontage Road West in Vail, Colorado. Specifically, the project site is located in Section 12 of Township 5 South and Range 81 West in Eagle County (Figures 1& 2). The project would remove nine existing apartment buildings containing 106 units, and replace those with three new apartment buildings containing 352 housing units, a 5-story parking garage, and a clubhouse. Thus, there would be a net increase of 246 affordable housing units, a positive impact for the Town of Vail. This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) describes the existing environment of the project site, � presents the proposed development plan, evaluates potential impacts and mitigation, and assesses cumulative and long-term effects and irreversible environmental changes associated with the proposed project. Please note, Tables are included with the text, Figures are in Section 6.0, and Photos are in Section 7.0. � 2.0 Existing Environment 2.1 Hydrology 2.1.1 Surface Water There are no surface water features on the Vail Timber Ridge project site. However, there is a drainage swale located just outside the property boundary that conveys water to the southwest between the North Frontage Road of Interstate 70 and the existing bike path (Figure 2). 2.1.2 Ground Water Hepwork-Pawlak Geotechnical (HP Geotech) conducted a geotechnical investigation of the project site in October, 2009 that included eight geotechnical borings with variable depths of up to 30 feet. No free water was encountered during the study. The borings were re-examined one or more days after the initial drilling but remained dry, however the upper soil layers were typically moist. Although no water was encountered, HP Geotech's report states that in similar mountainous areas with shallow bedrock, local perched water tables can develop during times of heavy precipitation or during seasonal runoff. In addition, frozen ground during spring runoff could potentially create a perched water table. 2.2 Atmosphere The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment provided data on the estimated ambient air concentrations of six air pollutants for the Town of Vail (Chick 2009, Table 1). Local air monitoring data do not exist for Vail, therefore Ms. Chick developed best estimates for the general geographic area using available CDPHE data. Ms. Chick's analysis concludes that the estimated levels of particulate matter, lead, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxicle, sulfur dioxide, and ozone are below state and federal standards for these pollutants. For further details, please refer to Ms. Chick's correspondence in Appendix A. The residential land use of the project site generates an insignificant and unmeasureable volume of particulate and gaseous pollutants. 2.3 Geology & Hazards 2.3.1 Geology HP Geotech's 2009 Geologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Rockfall Risk and Mitigation Study describes the regional geology and onsite features of the Timber Ridge redevelopment site, as illustrated by Figures 3 and 4 from their report. The near surface formation rock on the project site is the middle Pennsylvanian-age Minturn Formation (Pm). The Minturn Formation is an interbedded arkosic grit, sandstone, conglomerate, � � TABLE 1 Ambient Air Concentration Estimates � Timber Ridge Project "" Vail, Colorado ■ . ' Pollutant Averaging Time Particulate Matter Less Annual Arithmetic than 10 Microns (PM10) Mean 24 Hour Second Maximum Particulate Matter Less Annual Arithmetic than 2.5 Microns (PM2.5) Mean 98`n Percentile of 24 Hour Averages Lead Running 3-month Average Standard 50 ug/m3 Estimate Data Source 15 ug/m3 Vail, 1996, 1999, 2000 150 ug/m3 35 ug/m3 15 ug/m3 9 ug/m3 Grand Junction, 2003-2006 35 ug/m3 24 ug/m3 15 ug/m3 .0092 ug/m3 Denver Municipal Animal Shelter, 2007-2008 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Annual Arithmetic 0.053 ppm 0.016 ppm Woodmen Exit in Colorado Mean Springs, 2003, 2005-2006 M 'd (CO) 1 Hour Second 35 ppm 4 ppm Grand Junction, 2004-2006 Carbon onoxi e Maximum 8 Hour Second 9 ppm 2 ppm Maximum Sulfur Dioxide (S02) Annual Mean 0.030 ppm 0.002 ppm Woodmen Exit in Colorado Springs, 2003, 2005-2006 3 Hour Second 0.500 ppm 0.025 ppm Maximum 24 Hour Second 0.140 ppm 0.013 ppm Maximum O ne (03) Old Standard: 1 0.12 ppm 0.081 ppm Rifle, 2008 zo Hour 2"d Maximum New Standard: 8-hr 0.075 ppm 0.066 ppm Fourth Maximum * Data Provided by Nancy Chick, Environmental Protection Specialist, Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health and Environment. For additional detail, please refer to her correspondence in Appendix A. 2 r siltstone, shale and minor limestone and dolomite. The beds in this formation range from cemented and hard to non-cemented but firm. The bedding strikes to the northeast and dips � about 30 to 40 degrees to the northwest. On the hillside to the northwest of the project site the rock is usually covered by thin colluvium but a prominent outcrop band is present near the ridge �° crest that forms the top of the hill, as illustrated by Figure 4. This outcrop band has produced rockfall in the past and rockfall blocks are common on the hillside below the outcrop. The Gore Creek Valley in the project area was the site of valley glaciers during the Pleistocene. Remnants of a middle Pleistocene-age, Bull Lake lateral moraine (Qm2) are present on the lower � valley side just to the southwest of the project site. The project site is underlain by a late Pleistocene-age, Pinedale terminal and ground moraine (Qm1). The Pinedale till encountered in � geotechnical borings was a dense to very dense deposit of gravel- to large boulder-sized rock in a silty sand matrix. � Thin colluvium covers the Minturn Formation on the hillside to the northwest of the project site. Soil exposures in the Lion's Ridge Loop road cut indicated that the colluvium is a matrix supported deposit of angular rock blocks from gravel- to large boulder-size in a mixed silt, sand, and clay matrix. The rocks in the colluvium are exclusively from the Minturn Formation. HP Geotech also completed a Geotechnical Engineering Study for the Timber Ridge project site in October, 2009. Eight exploratory borings were conducted to evaluate subsurface conditions. The borings revealed a variable depth of fill materials underlain by subsoils characterized by dense, silty gravel, cobbles, and boulders. In Borings 5 and 7, about 1'/z - 3 feet of mainly sandy silt and clay was encountered between the fill and the coarse granular soils. Below depths of 7-29 feet in Borings 1, 3, and 5, hard to very hard siltstone/sandstone bedrock was encountered. Fill material was characterized by a mixture of sandy clay and gravel. HP Geotech's report concludes that the relatively dense, coarse granular soils and bedrock are suitable to support the apartment buildings and parking structure. 2.3.2 Hazards Avalanche. The project site is outside the hazard zones for avalanche, as illustrated by Figure 5, which was adapted from the Official Avalanche Hazard Map for the Town of Vail. Debris Flow. The project site is outside the hazard areas identified for debris flow on the Official Debris Flow Hazard Map for the Town of Vail (Figure 6). Rockfall. The northwest edge of the Timber Ridge project site is within an area identified as a High Severity Rockfall Hazard Zone on the Town of Vail's Official Rockfall Hazard Map (Figure 7; Photos 1& 2). In addition, HP Geotech completed a Geologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Rockfall Risk and Mitigation Study (2009) that identified specific rockfall risks. Their report states that "exceptional, very large rockfall blocks are present on the hillside to the west of the proposed redevelopment area." Their field measurements indicate the blocks have a maximum dimension between 4.8 and 7.7 feet, and an estimated weight between 2.8 and 17.3 tons. Although they conclude that future rockfalls would likely be infrequent, if a rockfall were to hit the building facilities it has the potential for severe building damage and could harm building occupants. Floodplains and Floodways. The Timber Ridge project site is outside the FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain and the floodway for Gore Creek, as illustrated by Figure 8. 2.4 Soils The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has mapped soils on the Vail Timber Ridge project site as part of a regional mapping effort (NRCS, 2008). As illustrated by Figure 9, the project site contains two soil map units: #46, Forsey Cobbly Loam, 12 to 25 % slopes, and #104, Torriorthents-Camborthids-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 65% slopes. � 3 ' � Forsey Cobbly Loam is a deep, well-drained soil found on alluvial fans, mountainsides, and ridges. About 25-30% of the surface is covered with cobbles. This map unit is characterized by a surface layer of dark grayish brown cobbly loam about ten inches thick. The underlying subsoil is very cobbly clay loam about 12 inches thick. About 5% of the acreage is covered by small sandstone � outcrops. The Torriorthents-Camborthids-Rock outcrop complex is on moderately sloping to steep, mainly � south-facing mountainsides, hilis, ridges, and foot slopes, including canyonsides above major drainageways. The unit is composed of about 45% Torriorthents, 20% Camborthids, and 15% Rock outcrop. The Torriorthents are shallow or moderately deep and are well drained. The �' surface layer is generally covered with stones, and ranges from reddish brown to brown. The soils range from sandy loam to clay loam and have a variable content of gravel, cobbles, and stones. The depth to shale or sandstone is four to 30 inches. The Camborthids are shallow to deep and are well drained. These soils typically have a light colored surface layer and are clay loam or r loam. The soils are generally free of stones throughout the profile but scattered basalt stones, Icobbles, and sandstone rock fragments are on the surface. The Rock outcrop consists primarily of „ barren sandstone, shale, and basalt. 2.5 Vegetation Resources The Timber Ridge project site is an existing development with no native plant communities (Figure 2). Ornamental landscaping surrounding the existing buildings generally consists of bluegrass and fescue lawns with tree and shrub plantings including blue spruce (Picea pungens), aspen (Populus tremuloides), poplar (Populus sp.), silver sagebrush (Artemsia cana), serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), spirea (Spiraea sp.), and privet (Ligustrum vulgare) (Photo 3). A steep slope between the condominium buildings and Lions Ridge Loop Road is dominated by the introduced grasses smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) growing with numerous weedy forbs including the noxious weed plumeless thistle (Carduus acanthoides), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), tumble mustard (Sysimbrium altissimum), and salsify (Tragopogon dubius) (Photo 4). A small stand of serviceberry shrubs is also present on the hillside. 2.6 Wildlife Resources The existing Timber Ridge project site provides limited wildlife habitat due to the lack of native vegetation, the density of existing buildings, and proximiry of the Interstate-70 corridor. Urban adapted species present include songbirds and small mammals. 2 J N oise The existing Timber Ridge development generates some noise from the current residents and their vehicles, however any noise generated onsite is negligible given the proximity of the Interstate-70 corridor and the noise generated by vehicular traffic on the highway and frontage road. 2.8 Visual Resources The existing Timber Ridge development was constructed in 1981. The appearance and condition of the nine buildings has deteriorated and now requires many costly repairs. The condition of the existing Timber Ridge apartments and the high cost of required maintenance and repairs were important factors in the decision to redevelop the site. 2.9 Land Use The Town of Vail's official zoning for the Timber Ridge Project site is Housing (H). The Current Land Use Map indicates a High Density Residential Development. The proposed redevelopment area contains nine apartment buildings with 106 residential units. 4 � , � 2.10 Circulation & Transportation The Timber Ridge project site is located along the Interstate-70 North Frontage Road between the Lionshead and West Vail Exits. Specifically, it can be accessed by traveling approximately 1.17 miles east of the West Vail exit or 1.42 miles west of the Lionshead exit along the North Frontage Road. Two driveways from the frontage road provide access into the development (Figure 2). � A Traffic Impact Study completed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2010) evaluated vehicle trips generated by the existing Timber Ridge development, as well as person trips using the Town of Vail's public transportation system. The traffic study was conducted on December 30, 2009, a 1 peak day during the peak of the winter ski season. Of the 198 units in Timber Ridge, 171 were occupied at the time of the study. These units generated 25 morning peak hour and 46 afternoon peak hour vehicle trips. For residents using the public transportation system, the development � generated 106 morning peak hour and 137 afternoon peak hour person trips. Thus, the majority of the residents in Timber Ridge use the public transportation system for their mode of travel. 2.11 Population The proposed Timber Ridge redevelopment project encompasses the eastern portion of the existing residential development (Figure 2). Within the redevelopment area, there are nine buildings that contain a total of 106 units, with an estimated total population of 424 residents. 3.0 Proposed Project 3.1 Apartment Buildings The proposed Timber Ridge project will consist of three 5-story apartment buildings that adjoin a 5-story parking garage. These are referred to as the East, West, and Center apartment buildings. The three buildings will have a combined total of 352 units. The East and West buildings would be on the sides of the parking garage, while the Center building would be constructed across the front of the garage such that it would obscure the garage from the Frontage Road. The proposed development plan is illustrated by Figure 10. Figure 11 presents a front elevation view. 3.2 Parking Garage A five-story parking garage will adjoin the three apartment buildings. The garage would be accessed from an entryway on the North Frontage Road, and would contain 522 parking spaces. Please note, 18 additional surface parking spaces would be located within the redevelopment area, for a grand total of 540 spaces. Twelve of these spaces would provide handicap parking. 3.3 Clubhouse A 4,689 square foot clubhouse would be constructed within the first and second floors of the West Building. The clubhouse would include exercise areas, offices, a cyber cafe, a club room, and a business/conference space. 4.0 Impacts & Mitigation 4.1 Hydrology 4.1.1 Surface Water There are no surface water features within the proposed redevelopment area of Timber Ridge. Storm water runoff will be managed in accordance with state law. Best management practices � ■ including sediment traps and silt fencing wiil be used during construction to limit potential surface water impacts. The proposed redevelopment area will have onsite storm water detention. Storm water runoff *' from drain inlets will be conveyed via buried culverts to a belowground detention area constructed of a 72-inch pipe. Three vortex sand and oil separators will be used to filter runoff before it enters the buried detention pipe. In addition, the detention pipe acts as a water quality feature because fines that pass through the sand and oil separators will settle out within the pipe. The release structure of the buried detention pipe will convey water to a buried 24-inch culvert �" which will tie-in to an existing culvert that conveys runoff south under the Interstate 70 Frontage Road to the CDOT Right-of-Way. Thus, storm water runoff will be released in the location of the i�' historic discharge. 4.1.2 Groundwater " HP Geotech's 2009 report provides recommendations for mitigating the potential effects of groundwater on the proposed development. Specifically, it recommends that below-grade construction such as retaining walls, crawlspace, and basement areas be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. In addition, it recommends placing a minimum 4-inch layer of free-draining gravel beneath basement slabs to facilitate drainage. The ` under slab gravel should be connected with the perimeter underdrain system by interior lateral �, subdrains. � , , �.• � 4.2 Atmosphere The proposed redevelopment of Timber Ridge will have a small and unmeasureable impact on air quality. There will be a short-term increase in hydrocarbon pollutants and dust generated during the construction process. There would also be small releases of hydrocarbon pollutants generated by activities such as heating the new development. The traffic study prepared by Kimley Horne (2009) estimated traffic volumes for the development in 2015 following redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge. During the peak winter ski season, their analysis indicates the completed project is expected to generate 42 and 78 new vehicle trips during weekday morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. These additional vehicle trips would slightly increase the levels of hydrocarbon pollutants over the existing condition. Overall, however the project is expected to reduce traffic within the Town of Vail by providing employee housing in close proximity to work. Employees that now commute from greater distances outside of Vail would have a reduced commute distance or would be more likely to use public transportation, which would have a positive impact on air quality. The magnitude of this impact on air quality has not been estimated, but it would likely be small and unmeasureable. 4.3 Geology & Hazards 4.3.1 Geology HP Geotech's Geotechnical Engineering Study (2009) provides specific recommendations based on their subsurface investigations of the Timber Ridge project site. It states that the native soil and bedrock are suitable for supporting the apartment buildings and parking garage, but that all fill material and debris from the existing development should be completely removed from below the proposed building areas. 4.3.2 Hazards Avalanche, Debris Flow, and Floodplains & Floodways. The project site is outside the hazard zones for avalanche and debris flow, as illustrated by Figures 5 and 6, therefore no mitigation is required for these hazards. Likewise, it is outside the FEMA mapped floodplain and floodway for Gore Creek (Figure 8). � � Rockfall Hazard. A portion of the Timber Ridge project site is within an area identified as a High Severity Rockfall Hazard Zone on the Town of Vail's Official Rockfall Hazard Map (Figure 7). � Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical's Draft Geologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Rockfall Risk +�° and Mitigation Study (HP Geotech, 2009) presents four conceptual options for mitigating rockfall hazards on the project site. The four mitigation options vary in the placement and type of barrier used, as illustrated by Figure 12. The first mitigation option is the placement of either a wire rope net barrier or MSE barrier located � on the property just south of Lion's Ridge Loop Road. The second option is a wire rope net barrier located off of the project site near the top of the Lion's Ridge Loop road cut. The third � option is to install a wire rope barrier off of the property near the base of the outcrop start zone. Finally, option four is to stabilize the rock outcrop with and anchored steel mesh net. A The Colorado Rockfall Simulation Program (CRSP 4.0) was used to evaluate the four different barrier options by simulating rockfall events. The program predicts the velocity, bounce height, and kinetic energy of rocks taking into account the slope profile, rebound and frictional characteristics of the slope, and rotational energy of the rocks. Using this program, HP Geotech developed conceptual design information for each of the barrier options including the height, �' width, length, and impact energy they should withstand, to be used for feasibility evaluations and preliminary cost estimates. The conceptual design characteristics were developed for barriers that * provide two levels of protection: 90% probability (10% chance it would be exceeded) and 98% e� probability (2% chance it would be exceeded) assuming a spherical rock with a diameter of 6.6 feet and a weight of 12.4 tons. The level of protection to be used will depend on the degree of � risk acceptable to the owner and governmental regulatory agencies. HP Geotech states that y, additional studies would be needed for specific design evaluations. In addition, the report briefly summarizes the equipment and access needed for installation of barriers under the four options. For Option 1, there are two alternatives: placement of a 900-foot-long MSE barrier or wire rope barrier entirely on the Timber Ridge property. Both barrier options would require a nearly level, retained fill bench wide enough to construct the barrier. Construction access could be from the property or from Lion's Ridge Loop Road. For both alternatives, rockfall kinetic energy and barrier heights at the 90 and 98 percent probability levels are within the capacity of commercially available MSE and wire rope net barriers. Option 2, the 990-foot-long wire rope net barrier would require an easement on the hillside north of Lion's Ridge Loop Road. Littie permanent hillside disturbance would be required, and most construction access could likely be accomplished using a crane Iocated on Lion's Ridge Loop Road. For this option, the rockfall kinetic energy and barrier heights at the 90 and 98 percent probability levels are within the capacity of commercially available wire rope net barriers. Option 3, a 1,060-foot-long wire rope net barrier would also require an easement above Lion's Ridge Loop Road. Although there would be little permanent disturbance to the hiliside, construction access would be difficult and would require an access trail, highline, helicopter, or a combination of these. For this option, the rockfall kinetic energy and barrier heights at the 90 and 98 percent probability levels are within the capaciry of commercially available wire rope net barriers. Option 4, stabilization of the rock outcrop using an anchored steel mesh net, would require an easement on the hillside above Lion's Ridge Loop Road. Grouted rock bolts would be used to pin the flexible steel mesh netting to the outcrops. There would be little permanent hillside disturbance with this option. Construction access would be difficult, and would require an access trail, highline, helicopter, or a combination of these. It should be possible to provide effective outcrop stabilization with commercially available anchored, flexible steel mesh netting systems. L t� 4.4 Soils The native soils of the site were disturbed when the existing Timber Ridge development was `` constructed. Fill material of variable depths was used to create a level development area and �, topsoil was applied to the fill to create habitats for ornamental vegetation. The existing fill material and topsoil would be removed and additional topsoil would be brought to the site for the proposed landscaping. 4.5 Vegetation Resources The project site does not support any native plant communities, but contains ornamental landscaping surrounding the existing buildings. These landscaped areas will be impacted when the site is redeveloped and will be replaced with similar areas of ornamental landscaping in proposed courtyards and in areas surrounding the new buildings (Figure 10). 4.6 Wildlife Resources The existing Timber Ridge project site provides only limited wildlife habitat for urban adapted species. During the construction process, these urban-adapted species may be temporarily displaced. When the redevelopment is complete, the urban-adapted wildlife would return to the project site. � 4.7 Noise The proposed project would create a short-term increase in noise levels due to heavy equipment use during the construction process. By 2015, redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber � Ridge is expected to generate approximately 42 peak morning and 78 peak afternoon new vehicle trips per day, which would create a slight, but permanent increase in the ambient noise environment of the area. However, given the background noise generated by the proximity of the Fl Interstate-70 corridor, the added impact would be negligible. 4.8 Visual Resources The existing Timber Ridge project was constructed in 1981. The buildings have aged and they now require significant repairs and maintenance. Replacing these deteriorating buildings with attractive, modern apartment buildings would improve the visual character of the area. The existing three-story buildings would be replaced with taller five-story buildings. However the parking garage would be constructed behind the Center apartment building, thus producing an attractive fa�ade that will be visible from the Interstate-70 corridor (Figure 11). Due to the steep, undeveloped slope above Lion's Ridge Loop Road, the taller buildings would not obscure views from the hillside behind the development. 4.9 Land Use The proposed land use is consistent with the Town of Vail's zoning for the project site (H- Housing) and would replace one high-density residential development with another similar project. 4.10 Circulation & Transportation The traffic study prepared by Kimley Horne (2009) estimated traffic volumes for the development in 2015 following redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge. During the peak winter ski season, their analysis indicates the completed project is expected to generate 42 and 78 new vehicle trips during weekday morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. In addition, it would generate 184 new peak morning and 232 new peak afternoon person trips on the public transit system. Overall, however the project is expected to reduce traffic within the Town of Vail by providing employee housing in close proximity to work. Employees that now commute from E:l � greater distances outside of Vail would have a reduced commute distance or would be more likely � to use public transportation. 4.11 Population � The proposed apartment buildings will provide year-round affordable housing to 552-570 individuals, compared with approximately 424 individuals in the existing buildings. Thus, there would be an increase of approximately 128-146 people residing in the project area when the re- �` development is complete. � 5.0 Cumulative & Long-term Effects & Irreversible Environmental Changes 5.1 Hydrology 5.1.1 Surface Water The proposed redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge would have no cumulative, long-term effect or irreversible environmental change on the surface water hydrology of the project site. 5.1.2 Ground Water The proposed development would have a slight, cumulative long-term effect or irreversible environmental change on the ground water hydrology of the project site due to dewatering of building foundations via underdrains. 5.2 Atmosphere The slight increase in hydrocarbon pollutants generated by the development and associated vehicular traffic represents a cumulative and long term effect. However, Kimley-Horn's traffic analysis concludes that redevelopment of Timber Ridge would have an overall effect of reducing traffic within Vail because employees would reside closer to their workplace. The majority of residents in Timber Ridge utilize public transportation. 5.3 Geology & Hazards The long-term risks presented by the rockfall hazard could be mitigated by any of the four conceptual options presented in HP Geotech's 2009 Geologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Rockfall Risk and Mitigation Study. After the feasibility analysis and preliminary cost estimates are completed, an option can be selected and further studies would be needed to develop more precise design specifications. 5.4 Soils Because this is a redevelopment project, it would not result in any new cumulative or long-term impacts to the native soil. As described in the Geotechnical Study completed by HP Geotech, the site is overlain by fill material from the initial development. 5.5 Vegetation Resources The proposed project would create only a negligible long-term change in the plant community as areas of ornamental vegetation are impacted and replaced with similar ornamental vegetation. 5.6 Wildlife Resources The proposed redevelopment would not have any significant long-term impacts or irreversible environmental changes on wildlife resources. The site is already a high-density residential development, and there will be no change in land use or vegetation resources. 0 � � 5.7 Noise � Noise generated by the proposed development and associated vehicular traffic would create a slight cumulative and long-term environmental change, however given the proximity of the � Interstate-70 corridor, this change will be negligible. 5.8 Visual Resources Redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge would create an irreversible change on the visual resources of the area. However, this would be a positive impact because the aging �` buildings would be replaced with newer, updated buildings with an aesthetically pleasing architectural style that compliments other developments within the Town of Vail (Figure 11). 5.9 Land Use The proposed project would not result in changes to the land use as one high-density residential development will be replaced with a similar high-density residential development. 5.10 Circulation & Transportation Long-term traffic estimates included in Kimley-Horn's Traffic Impact Study (2010) assume the `" entire Timber Ridge site is re-developed to include 700 units by 2025. Their analysis estimates r the development would generate 77 new vehicle trips during the peak morning hour and 142 new vehicle trips during the peak afternoon hour of the peak winter ski season. Likewise there '� would be 337 new person trips during the peak morning hour and 424 new person trips during the peak afternoon hour on the public transportation system. Kimley-Horn reports that the full � build-out may have a significant impact on the Town of Vail's public transit system and states that w additional busses may be needed to accommodate this use. 5.11 Population The redeveloped apartment buildings will support a larger population, an increase estimated between 128-146 people. This represents a cumulative and long-term increase in the population of the Town. � �J � � , 10 � � � r � � ` t �� t � � � 11 6.0 Figures �w � r� Ir P �- R R81 W � R80W � ?` QnOrc� E, ly uui�rc� t. BASE:�USGS 7.5 Minute Vail West, Colorado Quadrangle Photorevised: 1987 WESTERN � ECOLOGICAL �� RESOURCE, IN< MaP ,,,�g�.�..�� Location COLORADO 12 ; , � 7� � c � � � � 7 7 v/ �i�i � G nj rn 7 z c L O O O � � v z o�U.��..,��C, v..�...� � �.,.... _..,3 � FIGURE 1. Project Location Map Timber Ridge Project N Scale 1" = 2000' Contour Interval = 40' ; IA �.�.. k,_�3 . l.,.� .,.. .. ., .. .. �sU °�,at�e3�r�� .S','A '__ ; Jr.ik � _ � �L�� _ � J .�.J }- ,'�F ��u�t �-i'+.� rµ + ,�,y} {' � •� � ' �� , �.��ff� �.� . „ *: / ,� , . 6c ��,�! � %Vf •ti � � a'`� ""'z �; � �y7 a� �� K ;� :;: � ,. : 1!? �.f � � �' �' E�'F` �� , , . . , � 3�� - , , rr� � �' x •. � f ,� `�� . x: ,., 3 , �. . t ; - � _ '° v. r' :� .:Y� ... � "w3 ��5 ¢ , `�:,. ,� „�•rr� y � � � i dgd. _ �;''. �`"tiv �, � � <,y�` ��' �� pk`g � v� t, ¢ ;� � �, �„ K'��,r�°; ��}'[.� «�p;1t� $ '<E� '.�.yi:(�.,�,,. i� �cf `�.„r.P�4•� �i:k r�:t.. � �,, \ �� a,,,. R.:k, yL�n��.�'�dy'��' � ��.�� N �.. ,� ,,�r� �:, �,9;3+' �' ,�t ��r� .,f �,Q r°' ��F,'��p �� , r � •'�'�t, �u`� ve�.�� •� � _ ,i� . „r :'!F ° �u ` * r { �rr ��` } .:. �t .:. '� ,.«, � � \ . "; r, a:�� ` xy: � , ` :: "„k ,� � ,, ��r f , �� ` r '�� .;�' F Y � s"�;� ( +` �'�e: f �K � r� . � f�.. �„ , �x . �, �` � � 4 �, �. .� ° y 4 . � +�.'�rF - ,a :�, ` � S . �: .�, '� r � t . ' t ,�' 'r, r�,' � ,i� v:. `S�, - , � �'� a ��l '�' r,.t �, i� f� `� rE '`;P � „ . ' yw�" . r � . .� ''� � i *, '� a,� �>, :'i� �, ��' ` �'p`s/ ?`�6" n '� � r�l° �•r , . 'a �'*�. . f �• �. N�': ��. ro .e.R E,,�i , s , � a � € 9 + ; F. ; ; � F�' . �i y,� �:' ra p; � �r�F;' V �4� `y ,, '�• ` Y°,�" .,l�. _> : � ;'�.a w#� � �,�$*� ,�.,��` � j�.�,t,� t"r��t + ,,:+>f� ,,�', '+ *�r ��r* �r,� ' �5 . 4r"IR �r ,� ,,�t�'�i'e's� �i�� iXy; A '}?�` T' '' " y�, d � e n� �� \.. o° 3 ��!°` ¢ �b' �F�.gr%5 ��. � i �,�'�'jr }��.�f ��;1� �.y* -.,�`4s,, •: A+t7 '�`xt�``dF � �� '+� '�y�°� ' '��,�,��r - � �� ?*"�,�'.K(P`�.ar' `s i � t.. �.yl, _ _ r�.'. y �, .. � �,� x .!" . `�?�� 1 .� �°`� "�' ,�.b'". ( �r 1�PF 1t� �li A � ,r �''',� �. y� G, f� . i �. � � � � ��y�' if %`• 1 f $ �i�( d'. �r� � �e 4 � n 4 '+ � �s e � t;� e y .� \{� �$ .: x` t t ��` k* M .� Y��, � i'� '�,° `�yi f-v",��r� � 'A ,� t;l r °":�,� 'y� .{ .r,r, y � a �-�'l�^ �' .�,(yR �Y , �' � � � 'Rj' m<i' y4E� �: r,,�t+�' ;�F�. � . � �'� ,� L �+.'�'Y ��'� I� Y �� }T� ♦ d .�•� . �y�y j � �, ✓.ml '.F"" ��'�, ^"> %'� # 3 e� � . �j � . b . /t P � w ; n r` '�• ` .� . '� � r Rb, �' .. X �' .. � �1 �G F . ... . ., xY., � ... -�,,.;., . �,� . .. �< .a- : .� �. �. �y ° .. ! . ;♦ _� w 5 � i r d�.,�i� � i i. . t �, �. e �e ',r� g . yt . `r � : • ae•;. N" � � "�'�� .:� c".. ::. .. ....io �� r_ C�S t ".�-- _. rr *� 'j£�rd��r.. �' �.. .b�, �.,;.... Y �. , � � � � , r� �.�•',� � � r . r }""rt , . ^ . � Y •� �$4 � t�.F''�' °' . s a � "''� ' s, . � �X : ls � � e � � \ � �*" ".�r-�'.-�*�+�' x '* '� � ':;c � , t,� # � ! g� •. e• : „' � � � f �, f t� , ,r ., p ✓, s, . , . r �_ � ' + y �" � . �-� +r� .s' /�t ` f �' _-�,'t .: A�'*., . � .sG '�r �:.- `K�+ �'�i�.�° � _ . �t \ . � � �. F"' en�,. � gs y . r„� �+�r .;r ''7a . rr �G' f t .r A°�. �„ �., �. �+ m '►? � :'SfM' .�� ,� � `R r : . :., � , " � �. � y ' �_ e.. ia " `. f . � g. , _. . . . . , ` �XY ' Y� r;�^�T �I 'J / ��a« t.^' �"�li� � �"�^r^„F}tx'..� j� �" � <�t4�.. t r 1 •.fi.ry YRF '`�."'Ra f�� k� ♦ f t ��s' 4F . � '� 7F , '. "F 'w�'` Y } y 'G � � .'' . r, x# - �..� . \ !A M1i. '` i�3 .. � � • � � �'P- .�..� � � , , � �/ ,. � x�i�''. �n � `'.�. '. 't�. r krs n.i�:.. d.! { � f '' _5�., i. . � � �,. �, . � � . . . s-/x� �,. r a� � rt a .✓ ,� F �S� �.y �. � , .� . . � : � �. � !, ' .,y , ._ f � � ,f /„ 1^' . . h :. � k �„ ;�. �y� /' �.: ai � � �,�L 4 _ �: °"f.,o.y r �,� 1 DY', /''. � � � •� �•'' .? ' v. ..L.. '� . �Y' r", , , ,�^ . �� yr h °.r + -I" p T. .h A"� '�.f " .. . ,. . , ,� , ' � °' ,.,y�s � �� i� X Y." �� ?% � #� �?.,,�': � *yK €�.° " ,;''� .+. � �rrit � � jr � 'a°'r'.;. J.,�;y ..ld �. '�� ` - , - � Figure 2. Aerial Photograph Timber Ridge V.. � �egend. _�� , , � � �•��;� Existing Timber � ' Ridge Buildings �I �� Timber Ridge Boundary Area to be Redeveloped W�% ' � � � : . � �'11 ',hr• ��e „S�. �, . �,�!�(?Sa,-��'- . g.. �� d vr:� �.. ^'t,Y s" a'� i ��w '��✓ n v` �= „�,.�J� � . �iF � ... . - � , �. .� ,,,� .- . . . . - • . _ �,� .,„ � '�., s�f'"''' +�►' .�'i_.!° ° � ,��Y''�r ".� .": :. � „� � .F w.e1"'ir .� y" '�.'i r . ..�^ ,+:�` -t °'r i `'i" %',i... . . �C �� /l� ei.�w.r✓ ,�, � .v � � •��;��s"j..•' T,•' •'� i �:.;."�� ' iia.. A�+ �4:_' '�' .., �a�= ..d n 4!. t�' ,S,j..��f . . f.i. . , ,r.. . i�. '� 7;.+'. ��. � u ' `�'�* '� a; i a f..r�?. !r �✓ " �' � � ,r'': . . . �.. '' ��. . �- .. -,, x ¢" .. � . �4. � .� ,� ,, � -. `: ,,,, . i3 � �4� r '�'fi ;t� t w �� '< s :s" . �.,-r r ,. . , .r • . . . . :' . , �y�a - � � .;" x r�'�� F-''*'��.r .a� -N }M ho"x°� �+sr � �r;: ��,,.,, n .',�rk*.dys� .� y •,� tF ../� ,. �/� 'rr}�'�� .=3;.�. � t� ' . . y ��;,, .: ' „. . . . "� .:f•� ��qp, m* yyf�-t�� r�^'r. £ ... _ u ""t: v ,; . e ,� §� ' "'� ,•a � r t -,y� � � �'w 'a k :� � �, c � ..�+d` v�A` . �r: . . .,�. � �i � ��.,_,. �-' � , . �_wL t � � ... ,:�� ,,«r-nt'#.t'��..�sA' .yd%.. •�z� , . _OS -y,r�'aw "'�__ �' f r�..�s"�' � ..Fi .,�'.�`.�._'' .. . ,A'"' . ♦ . .�� fi', .;, � A , ... , t .. �. 6.4ar�'r �. ,,. -s , f'` x . i?'#' �".. fi d�, �:,r �: ,f` ....- `" n ;�„ h �n �: � ' a #. � ..�R�+rr •' .,�% � . . `�.�p . ...._ �•'. �.:., �} � ;f �' � y�i � 2 e' �Z' � a ��t�''� '.�..Jr,r v► jt�>"�'�r ��C'��.v�A.� , r�'Gb g4�� '`4fr �°.,�'+'DA,x•+ra �,� ,%Ft �- � ijq�. �^ �6 `y�` y�. , "i� . . � . ,�,F�a �/ ) x,: s+s�` `�'�'r�a, :'...�.N !! ... .`C • f , #"=w � 't t"F " ` �,/._ "' _J' "-+%i" .. i � r 'r�' . y . . ;:f :� . „. . < , rN%., r,. ., : � �° , y �,q� ,. ,,�f �. I •�� Y-� �r�e a 4�/;.°.:� �7��. - �'' � � {`=�'f �+s"' ` .�w .i, � �' r� Y" .�,.�; ri.�'. : s" "' ;',A rt'',�,nF'" .. . �� Q �.., �� y.- . ,,f E :� � /, � + t- '�: . � y �r . : .r' �` � ,'fki {� .. � �� . a .�a+� �S. t -�, :� t� � ,iA,. �' r, �t '� M1r. � .�r, \�; ,/:,.. /y � ..'„� ."� s.�: dyf � -.�� .��, .V��J a �}r�..'/�� i� ��'a•�;h .? -.�,•. . �F�e -,s . �i:� . .�r' � � � . !� ?' ' !i . , . ;w �* ...r ' '}� r w d , J�' ',.i��.= �6 f �' Y,d�; � � * .� b��.�ri +}' ih.,: �'S�:-1 .i . �:'. ° �� :�� t� s 'fr �"' R:hh �� s: , ..j JY ,d:.�J'�:7� . . F. .;�r �'� .. .. , , ..,w„j'rt` .• AX�� f �, �r .lX t y (�' ��' ' . �.I s:,�+a �"'�� ,". " � a �� .r i. s" .t+ h��^�.% �,m. . , . . • � ;a �V+?r'.•'r� . .� �+s. . � ',.- � 1x ' Y,. �' � .c+rtr `' � . . , � � �. -d l, 5 . . . . ..+ , ..� �#..tr iP; � � �_�. r , wr..'. +'P k .b�;! �,�4�„�4, , y''�'•'� y. �T K �.,,� "� :� ,s . i s �.,`�,,.. F�is4��"��ia" .a - ' � �,� � � -'x''.g%f4..-�a � � t...v,�:�f.. �T .,. y.!� � " ' -�11�� "r .,r-�' .,€�r-....� �,.,,,d6' �$',.R:� . ?k.i,lp� . � � � � ��".,'\ . ' `.� - � ... R" . d" �N". � `.... �„r. � ,st,v.�, �Y�J ..F ,; ,n�v" y � .:es . 'a. . c ,�r - -. .. � a+' , �j, "..., 9 :,s ,,,,a ,�� {„t .^ ,i ,� m:i' a�, . f. �^ . . . .�� . ./^ r . .r!', :. . _ � �. ,, , .�� r . . ... � ,rF � �'Y� ;9'� '�t"v�?;.Y�4vy.; e . r - ; i. ,, � � Y. ' +c�jc 1`'�.� Y�•�:� y''{7 i'�� ,G"S. � ,y�'} \ ,`�> /. . � ,� 4 . : _.� a ".:� .;r.�,. 'V �F ..: � .�*..r•� .. �s�� ... � .. ,r'(,!'� ir.•. .:i ��'�'�`'�"R ,r. ��.r,�l�ry� . .f �-'�� / S- � . - r�,,. Y .'.`..y�� :..��rr„�4c�,� ry....�.. . _� .,..�5',r�'�c� :it r t��•ni�m. .r `�y.. � .� *nw�-" . . . 6, . � . ., ,.� •� �.�; � � ..�„ . � .� .y�� . .� .. . . . � . -� ,t �� '^,3+". .�p,.,� t". •wr ..8. � - .' �� s�°� ��. .�y s'. �,i�� . � v-. � ;r' _ .� � �,: . � ,� � r �S ,^z ti-: I ' ' �� x p�..F "' % d5 -..J'rw 6✓ � , i�.� , , , �� . � ..n,... �. � � rtC",`.> ,.r . � �...s;:� ��.; ..,�, r.�„+c.a.a �..--.,� . . �. '�� t� , '� ,� �. . , , _ , ; > -a. . .;r.,-�. � : .� .s�. � , .� `��w .r t, � � _ • ' .^ .� :,St� i�r �T�'-. �F,.d'� ,,� ,r �, �f X Y:.�;. a•�u; a'f';•{l,x'{F-,Y" , �� .i' . [L - �;�`� . r'��„'� y 1'�r � � �' � r�+�{csd,r,�'`'y'"�.-Ci r i�.r�'=`., N � ,'�. , � s� ` : . _ .: , x. . .� ; ,� ,, � : � < <. , : t' � }� �"' .. i �.� �.�'TQc�.a" .L E l�•�- �^.`a�� ,s t �,� t�.x.; °�r,�.SA'. • �s c +� i�. .f'y�' .. �•�� .. ..:�.r ,'�':�: n*,,,y:�fL,.s�t,r_�. �.��,..if !r�!:f��.i�:,...b`�'r '�`.., r . . ,a� �:a� � + , l ••� . �'1 �t c• ; t .� F,., r �c.�. r��•-r�..�,�rF" q,��,. .• '�-. ` . Sk`�- _ � .� y r� „��,A. `' ? u .: '� A ,*E _ 2'!Y� `�- +.rr � jy!� � ' f`� ,.� � � ,. ,r.�.� ,J .,, < :M � ,r .. � � �.r;� r , �;., �'.'.k,� . �,/, ��'af `�� . . ,.: „ ,'_,� � � ....�. ' a,.;.`'� ,' / m . "�` ,y� �..� `�.-.$ � �' � � . y� �� ,y� � �..$ 1F 7:� . 3 .x � 's�� "„� �c 4,7y,�,�eT.•.�yLy,;� ��_. {!�t . • �„ � .. r = � . ' . .�, f.. , �L ,. • • p , ,�-v t � �. �,. 4 �h..'� Cr d� '. . �� F`i`' � � � « 1<f.C, ` ' ° � � ' � (/ � � �� ; t: f s :��. ':'r 'f: � . �,,�,,,Fm�! � `+',: �pr ;�ei,r3+_ �. ` � ^'i�l� J.. - r �.; ��y� , '�` . � '�►.' , . ��. . . ..� : a jyr l�` ,�'.: xM� »�, � q� •• ��a+�,��f� , - � ,- , r: • t � �Lx f � • � p� w� l� ♦ jk -� }µ� „�''e� Y` 5y�^i'�� r� ` .f �4 a�L \ . . ,ti. ! � �. . w _ ,. �A.. . ,� � .. Y : . r,A�ws..,. �+i..�� -.,. .��,'��is:t+t+�• � T � "M. �'� e �� . ,'II � . � � � a "f' .� ♦ �� r:', h ,. . � �� iM r � �;,,_ � o '',�+.R� , ` I f T� e,,.t'�� g� j' y:.»a -s'; ,.,r��--�1!a' I'R',y,,� ; ..� � _ T�� F�f x wew',.y� x`,e�r� nf�° �,��.F �, r�� . Y�s � ,`+-'�p• '� .,.� J�.° 42+�}'�.l��p � P,� �..� ` !� ��► �+ J � � . . � xa ��r, ;ts.,�...� r > '�� f � .�. �A` .> _ . .� : F�.��",�" r�' �r'� .' . '�� .. „ . . �+ � .,-�6',�c��}�c,,'�'��:� .�.� •�" � ,. �.t�' . . �a� S� � � '� � ,�+�.� ; � x'' � � � � � . , ., _ �. � , .� , . , � : , � -^,d- +P,.�.,.. .r . �•+ _ .. � . . � � t : ` `� , ,i �;fx .i: " /� '' � � `�.;. 3'�� j'�1�f+. �r�, F ' .✓'� � _:`' , � ,,;• c �S1 :.,:. �� : �'?�' � ,.., � .:. ' ... ,�. ,z . � . . �.. �. ±� _ .. .�[ Y�.,� � A1',:f1_. . . �' �, � ,: ��'" �� f r . *�`p "'° ....- . �' fi��.. �1 , s'C�'� r� �,.t%. " ��. ��. � r . "s� . ..� •� ' , �'',_� ^�,m X _ . '��, � � . �� ::"` ��* : �s � ;, � � �; .�. ' , .� �y # M' � � �� F « � . . . �� f . � \ : �'/ . . ._� �„�+'� � . � � ��. �r . l: �"'' .�� ,��' � ` ` ' ' '� ✓ ` S� 3� r� ' / T {^ Y Ft ��,Rf,... qf. Cy ',VK'� .. • ...- ,�� "�S' .. . E'^�:� �Or , �. �. ' .__ `,.. . .:. �M,"+ �. ,:. . , { �. 4' ._ �•�. ''.. . i�- ' � �. +t � ,� ��,F..>,�. �. � ` .r`' . rr � .f'� i. . . �. I ` �'�`�'�r '� `k' � .�,' .Y � � � � �'.. ,;� , . .� � ; . � �. . . . • . . � ,� .. 4 r'c , • . , �.� ��'' Y � •;;�` �'�► , � r ; . } 'r � k ..� ,,,. � ,�,-�' M\,'�''� ♦ i z , �' �, ��';, , �' : �,. � , �\ � / /� ' � . ' �_��' -"� , �` ` ,� ^ t � - • - � / \ r � ,�s'-� "7 , ` � '��.� . ;�� , ` - . 4'-. _ �`� e, � �� S r . ,, ,. . y ,r= � . .- . " .... . . . P.,,� °° �' . � ,+ �� a ��. ,�, � � � ��:: � � . . . r � `F" .. " � � t {,. �'� . .� y�; � � < . . , : - N,.. �. : : • : � � :,� ,;� .,� . . .<_. �_ R� k Date: January 2010 Scale: 1 in = 150 ft N pnpand by: W�st�rn Ecoloytcal R�sourc�, Inc. � 711 Walnut Stn�t Bould�r, CO 80302 13 (303) 449-8008 FA% (303) 448-9038 Official Avalanche Hazard Map Town of Vail, Colorado . � i�: � � . . - � . �e. 3 . . '\ %�.".�z", .. _ � �� > - � �� 1L �; �?;�' .� u� , ,� �-�J��. %�/� :.i:. � . � .......0 �-,.. `�`. '. � . ;r � ,:,_: _� �; / C � . �� ` FIGURE 5. Avalanche Hazard Map Timber Ridge Project HT T TK5 7s T' Hpure TKS Granby . � YXr � � � _ !� BAz � _ _YXr Y � MZ , M MZ �,.., Kremmling : � YXr TKi \ �� , C� YX,' � YXr � � _ Ti ��D� / � wFonc �`X t� `•` \1,�, TKS X� Tabemash� Mz Wiir,a,�R�s Ts � YXr � o� �r Ts � � Z Fraser Tv � YXr 5� T Pz Ts T� Gcp d� z rY T� `,,. � �L,��. Tv Tv Mz � �' a�is � YXr ? (J ��a,� � � + GreQ % Mz Mu,. , S J Sta Bridge Res. \, � � Tv r� �L�`� a�9e Ts ~ � Mz 0 Tv �5,� TS � � F' _, B��ns C L ��,� � T' b r` .� p�, �i y TKi� MZ � �G ..' �.�i � oi�it o �` �� _, '� yGr --,�� -e__. �cao�9et s Pz � y `� �% Project �� `�' `, ` i . F..dwards � 51�8� - � Silvertha� �.. ` TV� �b � .AVOn a1 � 0 Tv � �- vai� � d7 Pze � �� Ts /{ , � ' . .. _ _.. YXr Ti ' � G � Mz z TS PZ �� '' .. .) � �• PZ MiMUm � i . ,`. ` TI � �� f � F � \� ��,� TKi ` v' ' Red a�tt �, �, �� ` P / _ 1 � 3 YXr Mz YXr � 1 �'� co TKi � . Coppe � �� ¢� e . Ml �K; Z Pando TKF�p � � � �,, ' r ` TKi TKi � 7Ki � � �� Pz � !� Ti `II �+ Tv T i PZ � Pz ,: � �o JeHeison ,� MZ k YXr TKi �, Ti Crmax PZ � � )' TKi P TKi i � '�. TK' � J � � ^ Z TRi t � P p� � ' `Co�mo -.. . � ° o Q \, � TKs �� T!�(�(� TKs . � � � ��C � � � T\�� MZ � R � Tur oise Pz TKi ��-- " �-� O � S� TKi Res ..%1 Nfqe'1. � �' �Q TKi Explanatfon: �Post-Laramide Sediments MZ Pre-Laramide Mesozoic Sediments ContacY Ts Tv Post-laramide Volcanics PZ Paleozoic Sediments Hiah-Angle Faults Post-Laramide Intrusives -_; Pennsvlvanlan Evaporites ''' Thrust Faults p 7 mi Ti •Y�f4 � I 1 TKs Laramide Basin Sedimeats ,YXr Precambrian Crystaliine Rocks � S ncr�li,nes gple 1 in. = 7 mi. �= Laramide Intrusives ------ H��Way$ Modified from: Tweto (1979) , Hp1� Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project Figure 3 109 3106 G�C7L Re ional Geolo Ma HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHN�CAL � FIGURE 3. Regional Geology Map � Timber Ridge Pro�ect � 14 � _�.n..�._— � � � � � �■■� � � �■ � �°* � ��`i �--� �—� � � �",� - ■""'1 �"� � ^ � _ -.-.,---=_:z�z�_:_.. s� ' : s�c � �'` ' o �,> m� `�g, � , C'� W ' `' QcIIPm ,�, r' � 1 , . .� . � ; , . , � , . ; � .� , : � , � � � � � �� -� t� � , � ✓ O� �_ .' o�. 'J se/ �'/ � 1J Qm1 ji � _ Qcl�m ,,. x � �' �� %� �� - ; : m — �v- � �, , � � � Y�ey , 1. _ _ . : � . �z o _ __ . . : : ., ; ,-;� ,,. , ,� � , ,` ,-�� , � "�`e� S ;../ , e �-, s � / D ��' � ; � I _ , e ; f ¢� . . '' � �� . �. � ; s� �`\ , . { u xr+- _. ; '�� \ ee� a/ / m � � R�dOe � " '� � � � ��1 <� `� . ' � x: s� . �� . . AsP°^ ' . � f . %.. �.. . QC/�11'1 � . !' . •1.86 n � D \�^ / � �` �,'.- _ � ,� . , - , z , , • � n � � � g � �e3 , / /` / j ;> ea " � � � j/ af ,, g�,F�„� $ ��,r � �,�.. �, , • � �, Q' � ' � ,✓j^`-- � ��,,, ��,��` % ' ,� ' � � � fi'� 11'/ /' , m+ �a9°� , . ti� `"B2 �-��0 ' f ,. 0 0 �JIocS .-"' /� , `�' Bt ^ / ' � _ .... ._.. o� �� . j ��j � � �y �„ \ � ~ �,.� / [; I U --i � � ' �% Y� �;�m1 �,`�� ;d ,� � . ... � - � ..6�� ••i%' "�/ �. • a ` c�.,..�:� � Qa�� %� . _ .. .r. �. / �` '/ " � �. � � ' % t. � D, � 32 . . .... .. ° <' p �$,r fi . ' J'±�N �� .y/�P�e� � � ��' l'�� l `� !'� � �Q s�'� p _ �� / �l,.,, ' � � \ .�� a. � � /� m1 .. Q Qci6'm . . , �,�p,' � � Qm1 / / D �p � '�' �' : �. 1 w:. „ � � @ � �`.^ j i ; � /r r' 1.� FT _�' . � r . �? i � � �� . r' � � C�D � �� i� � � � �� '� ' � ! � � - � �. G� Q !� .!� s af -T� � ,, .� , , � 4 M" -=``✓ �,p \ <� \ \� 1 � f m m �� e �./ r,., � / . � � � r'Qa _ � , �i o { � ; i � Qm11 _ '� � � � C m t' rS.% ,�°� � ^' `` �� ; � � � � QRIZ �� ''� �� J� � "��.t�Tl� a � � � `� � , , �\ ,� 1 1 R1 � �" F / � �1 s � `�, � � � .�� , s&.7t'�� N� 5�� '� i �i , ? � � .....�.,� . ;, ,-' � .' � .- `•.� � • . / � i � � � /f �. � � � � 1 � p � �. � Explanation: Explo�atory Bo�ings af Man-Placed Fill: Q��,m Colluvium over Minturn Famation B� • '� r* Mostiy road fills � D ; ;; r,�; ; Rock Outcrops 1 � s,c. � Cross Sections: Qa Post-Glacial Stream Alluvium Line of cross sections shown on � � Contact: Younger Moraines: Approximate boundary of map units. Figures 5 through 8 and 10 through 'p � Qm� Pinedale-age till in tertninal and ground � 3' � 250 ft. 0 O moraines. Very Large Rockfall Blocks 1 � � + 30 Strike and Dip: �' O � y Strike and dip of bedding in degrees. Scale: 1 in. = 250 ft. <D cQ �� Seismlc Lines Contour Interval: 10 ft. n � c Older Moraines: '�`� m Qm2 Bull Lake-age till in lateral moraine. December 2009 3 � � -o � � �: w i 4 � � � O fficial Debris Flow Hazard Map Town of Vail, Colorado �� '�, � � '�� " � 'r �;,�� - { ��` j_ ��.:. � ��`- � �. �� y \ �'� .�� Project Site ; �t. .,� , � �,_ . i ,.. �� i � / 1 � � '. ,. .. � — � . , `` � This is to cerCrfy that this is the Official Debris Fbw Hazard Map of the Town of Vail, Colorado as adopted by Council on October 17, 2000 in accordance with Resolution No. 13, Series of 2000. Source: Town of Vail Website: www.vailgov.com Adapted from official Town of Vail Map Hazard Zones � High Hazard Debris Flow Moderate Hazard Debris Flow � High Hazard Debris Avalanche `� �� ` � ��^� �. V "' _ " . ��~��".< Mayor, Towrlbt Vail `t; $8AL ` G�'�'t�Q�. ��Co.-- � Attest: Town Clertc, Town of Vail �; c�� .. ., a;.� �f'e�., t; �.. .L4. i��u. N 17 FIGURE 6. Debris Flow Hazard Map Timber Ridge Project '�� WESTERN � ECOLOGICAL �a�P RESOURCE, INC. ,,,,��«.��.,.�o�� Official Rockfall Hazard Map � Town of Vail Colorado � � P W `, $ ��r _ f _ :, .. ,',; �J, �ly _ ' i , , ,, ,. �`� � ��'r �� .-��_ � �,� ��_�. , � ;� � � � _��. ;� � " � �ti�� ' � � . � `•��`>� �' ._ .. - � ��.: � .. _ ' / �\ /T Y . . �. . .' , j .� , - This is to certify that this is the Official Rockfall Hazard Map of the Town of Vail, Colorado as adopted by Council on October 17, 2000 in accordance with Resolution No. 13, Series of 2000. Source: Town of Vail Website: www.vailgov.com Adapted from o�cial Town of Vail Map Hazard Zones � Rockfall Hazard with Approved Mitigation High Severity Rockfall Medium Severity Rockfall Project Site �, . . ,�r,��:� ��.. � �.��,� Mayor. Towrf+bf Vail SEAL `` GJ�' ` d Attest: Town Clerk, Town of Vail �;�cr, �,� �;� .,� L...M:,�.� . N , 18 FIGURE 7. Rockfall Hazard Map Timber Ridge Project % � WESTERN I ' ECOLOGICAL 1� a'� j RESOURCE, INC. �„ ��5�,�. ��,, �o ��Z � rJ � c� �_ , v � �t_� 's' � � j J �� 5� � � . ° 0� C� � ,r�� C� Y � �` � t�.. !. ` `�/'� �" �; � � I / � i' ��' � / �� , '* � VQ� �� i '' � • :o�a�' �*, �� ,� � Q � i / `, r � >'l ,�� '� � m ' i `� j . ,/ �� J� �� i� - �'� � 1 Q� , /� � — j ��FF R i � � .�o ��,�P� �� ,-- � j , �i � � CJ >`� � � _ NRtio��° � � / '.�%' G % � � `� �' +� �� " �- = -��;� � � ; ,: __ Project Site �� , � � �i�/ � �� '� ap � .� �� e � �. o��,�a�d � � , , a�� ' o�. � �� / �� Q ��or'S�`� � ` , / /�%! ss-z � ," nt 150 39-1 / / � � i ,' -i ��/� �� /l �/ i'/%/ � j/ p—� `,\ � . �. 2 'L:]' \� j � �+a$ � Pt � '� � � __ o �,�� %/ /"� - �' �2�s � ��'/'/� � � � � , -, % � r-- - �a� <_ , � , �, � , `�.,,� � �� ,� ��/ 1325�(�5� �2 � �✓ � t ,% � � ,�� , ,�' 0 �� O � �. � � 1 � �� ; � �: .�,�,- ,,��.� � � __ � �� ,, � �. �� _ - __ _ � m , � �., � � �,� � �� ,5Q0 � � � � i M�4T7'Ei�HORN C,T _ 3� � � ��', � � � �� 1�r��'�'; , _ _ o = �`\ r��+` � � Y ._-- � �Ij I... � �j �� O � _ _ 1552-1554 La LJ � �� ,� 1� �C�� 500 Feet � ° 1872 ^`� 250 0 250 �� °}� This maP is far flood irm�uance P��e °�y: il does nd nacessarily Q U � Q � ahow all ereas �ubject to ibod�n6 in ihe cartmixYH or aN d�metric ��D. teaWres oulside ot tlie mdicaled flood haxard aeas. i pp Q �� 2� NI�B�@fS I� Z 0 �?� i> R!ry � This meP was created bY the Town d Vaii �IS Depart�r�n��d Vail ----. �, o ty /��i QQ�c or mis nma �,wa ee f« s�� a�� N -, C7 ,,:'3 '✓ J does not warrent the ecwrecY d Mie intamation aontained I�erein. _■__�_e� O C1�....1..•w�i ��1 Source: Town of Vail Website: www.vaugov.corr� Adapted from official Town of Vail Map Legend: FEMA Flood Hazard • Gae Creek � Building Footprints Flood Hazard Extent Parcels (approxlmate) l� Floodway O 1% Mnual Chance of Flood Hazard Vail Town Boundery N 19 r'1l7UKC �. rlVVUN�a�� an � ...v....�� •-•--r Timber Ridge Project � � WESTERN �� ECOLOGICAL oQo� RESOURCE, INC. �a�f rn wvnuc sr.�x • ewieer, co eowz �� . � � . � . , , . t ' .. ,. a,y.. �� .. i ' �Y/r � *A„� "" q� _. ' � .�� . .: . ' +� � . y!r � �i� �1 � �I!' t� ``� a� " +�"ilj'�t�? �� _ . . ,,� ;�„ � i e . i . ��T # �� } � Y � # • { � ��,�fE�X� ��'' r ' .!7 Y �. i �+x� � • �� y�"" *' E _r � / � � � li,. �' � ' > � �r ' � � � i`� : `� �..� `! " "� � �.z � � Y ��i M�i� �� . . !� � w, a.�� , � � ;.. �' s, ��" � �`. ��` � � � �� , � i, « , �, ,�, � � ,a� �� , .;,�.� ,� � . �' � ., ,,, ,� :� � �,� � � � . �� • �,�, *" �'" �,'� ,• �k � �r , � � ,,�" , �;`� � � {+� ��- � � �#� . '��g � °. ' "" � � �+�, �y ' �� r'6� �'�` ,� '` � �' � � t� � �F �, 1E �"►K' �j r� � :ir-� t �*; �f i �� ' y'� � • � yas.. �i yr.. «�. � w�� . �.#A' ° . � t y . ' . .. 4 � , .. � �: , � . pF.. ��r . y � ��'�h � ....��"'�� `., a v�.i Pffi� �� `.�' .. � � ��,.�x�.� * �.` . . i . d `'^� � ` , , g v x , , ` � � ♦ �« ' , � �: � .� � - �d' . ,� , . ,��r'� ,� . * �, �AIr; ,� . . � . > �,� R� ,� . z,�q .- ,k . . � � . ' �i . .Y. - �� ` � ' �' *. _ ' . .. r "�,� . 't s..v � • � �!, � � f # � w� a s '�F :§,�.� ^ 4 ° '� � � \ s , � ° . .. � '� ,�, ,..* a ' .„ r .. A ..>� � * . a, i . �. : -�� yy ��z .�. 4 .� � , '• � . . e * �y� � , �a • k . �-.. '� ��F6 k ..� Q � .ir� , i. � � �� S "kt � es� ' i. �� ' . . �*.� � � � � � �! • .� X a �p ��. t, ! „ „, � � . �. . " , �!. '� . �� r�'�,.. . a `v, ��+ r �, s . a ` ,� , � .a� 8 � �* • «� .# .�• _� . . � ._ , '+! .y � .. . � � .:.�r � � � k� � �� R b ' .. !, t�.. �. 'r ::>- ,. .� , kr �, -�" -s'r� s�k+.. ,<�. .,. .._ . � F' �� ' �; ,�' �« .. r - � �� . � � �� . - � � � �''�.. � � . � � E ,� � ,+�"' � .,� �"► ,� � � � . �' �"'t, : � �� , ��.' •. I+' - � �� • � J�, � ` +�r "� �a�� . � �,.. � o � �' �" ; " ' .'�'�•� . �� ' ' , . ,..• � ,� . //''� � '� �;�� A : I F� �� -., � � � � M `� ��'� �� r, �� *� * �`� 4 1,�`.#i � ^ M� �'".^ r* i'�4 � �f .� � �� "4 �. � "�! ��s ` � �j��a ,,� � • �'�=��x �� s . x � � ! 1� � � �„" � �.w�� <'>�,� �: q�' ��. . µ, !t "' �•.,,� '� '' , �, � ,� 0. � „: ` � +� "° � � '�,� �, ;'� q � ,� ,1i' � �/` . .� . � � * ,�� "m�f -�� ;�. '�» �s.: '`�"' .'°"�,' ° * �'rf �' � � . ��4# � � � "'� �, ,�"„��'��r'�,'�� s �:� � �i`�t . �°� '� � p �� 1�": � �'� �� "� �`# �� . � *t�{ "�,� � .' ' ^ F p �y � �� i +` .p#� r e..� .�' �,.� _�x'� *a ,�- i �}� ' � '! i„ ' ;�� {' 1�� i1p�_� �' b- '�� r �e �, . �,,i. � � a �C , ° t � � � � ,_�%' y �� <,.��_ Y � _� . %t,.�� : � �p� �A �,B�E .y, "*""�'ti ��` .'�� +a � �� P � `� ,.'�$ '� � .� w �"� � * ,a� l..; aR.a , �y��' y � Ra ..� �� 1�.. ` � � ; � �� .. � ��i+.++�". �� '�b �x.�w�A' � � �,., t9� � �,-� � � � y , A� £� � �p �. �� '� �#'�' �tl � �R*�` �,. � `;�'� � ��wF � � � . ` � . a�` ' � e' � j Figure 9. Soil Map Legend o 50,0o Zoo 300 40Feet Timber Ridge Project Project Boundary Soil Map Units: 46: Forsey Cobbly Loam, 12-25% Siopes 104: Torriorthents-Camborthids-Rock Outcrop Complex, 6-65% slopes Source: NRCS Web Soil Survey, Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties NrePore by: Weslern E<ologka� Resourtt, Ina � A 7� 1 wa�nw sn..f Bouidar, CO 80303 !� 303 ♦a9-9009 Fnx 303 aa9�9038 � , � � � ■��-.__-- �� ,( _ _ __ _ Zae�-0' _ � __ _ -- _ I _ _ _ _ _ �r� ---- � LION'S RIDGE LOOP r. _ , :� . . ��' ' "`... � ` .�..� � ,� �ar E7GSTING � � � . 9LDC'. J ! , �''w r � Exl7 � " . . �. / t�`, „r.. " �\ . m r. - �. . � �, �: ' .-.. .. ,., t^s s:. ' . K• > � � "� � r _a x .?n, i ,�,� € .� ,,...., � '�. . �, � , ��`\ . .. .�� . �. _ . � ,. _ � � ��,� y . ,, � �� ., � 3. _ .�f �� . ,. EXISTING OFfICE ■ � ��4{ ��:��7 � � � �� i ��I� 1 % wi i� '� � �— �� /� �� .; � � _ .. . � w,�v,�� F _ _� F �sl �'sy��c}� 5-STORY APT. �o ( WEST ) " a �. , � �� .�s. . . � _ vd � 1 i �._x-_\:e� �_� 20' PAVEO FIRE LqNE % SIOEWLK ! BIKE PA1H �_ ----.-...� 5-STORY PARKING GARAGE ! i - � � � � � II '� � i � 5-STORY APT. CENTER , , — � t�/ F ��-�---�^� � . k (.ARAGEENTRY ...i--�a \. '�'�� c � ,� � -� i .- � - � NORTH FRONTAGE WEST —► � INTERSTATE HIGHWAY O. 70 -.,,�„�,� --- - � SITE PLAN .{ � D � �� I � `�I��.� s . ��:�.s wws-f s"�I�rR'irl�-wrt�'�-w�� ....�� .- ,�",..,_.,..._._ _ . . ^S � ��q FiN,�l F� `+P e,� 5-STORY APT. (EAST) _ _ • , . i .� .-._ i . .-�.. � -� .� � �. �. ... . ,. _ ... �1 . - _ _ _ —~ � � �`�. 'c� ._.,�--- .. � .._�--;-- . ��, \�''d.,��„ 21 � � � � SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CALCULATIONS LOT AREA: 524 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: H (HOUSING) TOTAL UNITS: 352 DENSITY: 87 UNITS PER ACRE BUILOING HEIGHT: 5-STORY I CLUBHOUSE: 4889 SF. BUILDING GROSS AREA: 3p5,qpp SF. GARAGE GROSS AREA: 184,25p SF. PAVED AREA: 3,000 SF. PARKING 8 DRIVEWAYS: 31,308 SF. BUILDING COVERAGE: 94,100 SF. ( 47%) SNOW STORAGf AREq; 10,600 SF. ( 30% pqyEp qREq) LANDSCAPE AREA: 72,372 SF.1.86 pCRES ( 3196 SITE AREA ) PARKING REQUIRED: 1.5 SPACES FOR UNITS LESS 7HAN 500 SF. TOTA� 893 SPACES RE�UIR DEWITHOUT'RE UCTiON�N � SF. TOTAL 520 SPACES REQUIRED WITH 25% REDUCTION ( 25% COMPACT CAR SPACES ALLOWED ) PARKING PROV�DED: GARAGE: 522SPACES SURFACE: 18 SPACES TOTAL: 540 SPACES INCIUDING 108 COMPACT SPACES ( 19%), 12 F{qNDICAP SPACES ( 1.53 SPACES PER UNIT ) TYP. PARKING STALL: 9' X 19' (SURFACE); 9' x 24' ( PARqLLEL) 9' X 18' ( GARAGE ) 8' X 16' ( COMPACn FIGURE 10. Architectural Site Plan Timber Ridge Project � I �„ � i;� � , .r , �_�. - � x _ , . . ,�. . >, - �,�:�� t ;: , � � : _,. �m <.7 ..., _ �, �.�,�� , h � �. � . '. � . � . _ N.:: ,._ � .: . �x...�.. . . �. �:�.�,,.� . .��". .�w�' ....:..�. tr.. � e \ . , ,I iii: �� , li�s . ■��. #��u! � 95 1� ss R � � �. ... �rt ,.. �: .�y�p'," pt.�r. � �� ' ]Ei4 �.. ts'� • c�� 2iN19 by MUMPNREYS & PAR7NER5 ARCHIiEC75. LP The arrangemenls depicled herein Nchilectural conceptual site plans are forieasibifty purpose are the sole property ui Humphreys only. Revisions may oaur due to iuMer invesGgation from 8 Partners Architec�s lP and may !egulato!y authorities and 6uilding cotle analysis. Dimensior�s not be r?p�oauceU io any (orm shown are ot a svategic ir.!ent �nry. Refar to surveys and r,i�nl withoW cs �.vrJien permis?in� tlrawnigs fo� techr�a! informa:�or, antl measuremen�s. � � .,..,. , .. , �� ,� ��. ra��a r", r �� .; � �� i� ` �. ■ s-: a■ � � <.� i� ■ ■ ■ ■ � ■ i. , (a ��e �� - u i�l��f�(� � � ■ I!I ! I r � . � ��: � � :� �.�� •I � � ■� �t � i �� , �i i . ■e • ■�1 �� I 3: � �l �� lM1�aa �1�� + 54 � s� ;.� �6 W�fb� ;a� / i,: �E _ — •�� w �� aw �i��l� ��x irr �r � r.' n �� - � n � � . $ ,Y . . _ , �.. � �� Q y� � .� Y �- � � � � :� - , � � Rk �r�� = � - � L/ ��. �' p (�'* �� .c'�,,..��i�C��' . _': �K�� .�8"i1 4 �1 ��r. . �� "� "7 _ _ ��"_ � /. �i�'�; � �_ # We p{� " x��1��} n 6 ��1Yt M�; � _ f . ., _ ., �! �; ,�;; , .. .. �.. �� ■�■ I�� =� �.� ' ��_ � �� -�' ��.' �_. ��I �. ., -�,� �Ii; ; ti , ■• VAILTIMBER RIDGE VAIL TIMBER RIDGE, LLC HUMPHREYS �y� PARTNERS ,`��NITEC�TS, (_ .. v E,i,� . �� . ,�i, t � �. �, :, � > > ,. ,,, � • ,� � � ,��, �,� ;_ � l'1�#1'Q9�24 � � .� , • ._,. , i:; . . ,, F . ��,! I � . �� ,! �,'�,G 12-30-2009 TOWN OF Vpl�., EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO HP �: . �. � � ,�:� � — � � � �� °°� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � c N � w m � N � C) 'o �� a su cc — �� .o 0 �� ' � �_ �� rt �Q� � � O� 3 � '� � O� � N w � � r � � � ' ' � � �'�`�- �.- «'' � .�. , �r .� `�-- ' � �4 �� ..... ' -- `� �� M,, �,,,� * � "2 h.k"=V' r .' -W4 n �,�` 1 ,�. �� . �"� 4 _ .. � , ' 3 � �s . !Y � . "A� f1'"' . , .� � y .. � �.a� N!�'� � �a"� � . ' � � 3 A 4 r:�r' > .. � `4" ✓+'...a : �+.,. ' .� � .. ...,� . :'�.�,,. � .iftt i��t•�`� � �i � ��r' . � ' ��'�` +�, i ! .,1j'- 4 4 .,,e{�' ,� a�.'�� .. � y�� '� �� y. .`q'a'}�' 4�+� �� + y= e• iNt� .y� f F � .. .• "-��.�� . � s � �t �'a� � � �t� y� . � . - ' h-:..1w� '-7 � �, t � x . 'p, 4 * _. �°.� �_' .�A 4 W�y .. T , . ��!.�� ` / �JY W� �6M �l ' w lt � � � ,� u.: � i/, �� . . . r � ♦ � �iw, � � � � "A{' �./'��t .Sa �' ,� • _�r� ' �� y�"� � � T� ;��' �kw, � i'!F j�� 4 ��'� z�s��re,�' — - �p�- 16: i-��:�� .�� r5� � +A7�',.''.f 3# .A � = .� .V �1t "�� ' � � e�s +� s"� � .� � + g� . *+�.. r�i. �. � X"7fjM•.t , -� , fi.Fl , t+� . � -. +.s'aa �.�„ ...�,�.: � . � *��:�.. . ;R'yy`� -'� . -� '� �� } ,,,��i. M.: � /� � � _3— k }wtF,� %r , '� :e.� �Y"� T q �y",�. ,.�M=w��+l�y�� 'j.� � �i � % lK+7�P" p . k. '� Ms',.p . .. .z^�. �'f'w ' il�� ,� 1,_� �;� �si� � .-,'��t� '' ,y. �'b . �:., �� ... � . ' ,. � , Y .�� ..� � ' ' y " .. � " •P _ . r. . .. �y T � . . � � r -. i " �tli � _ -�4 � �,.� : , , -, --� � ' _ - �:�'r � �4 ,� '� � y �'� s � � � � � ,,y�—� . F ' "�;1 f ` .�t �� ' ' ,.V �.. ; ' . . ;c`�.. � - „ �{< ; . ,�, � � .i i,'' �..g �'.� ..o-a�,•_�, �i.. .. . -. . � � � � � v .. �, �i. _ . : # . _ _. — .;o.,. -� _ ... .. ` � . � . _ �, , � ,. � � , - �.. , r.��K -..., 4.ti:�: � � � .. . :a ,R,« . � � .. ,�s,.=� .�r•� - . '�� °`�i � . ~�r ""; �, � �� ; , �.. � � .�'ti:. ��.;, �.,,q�.. ,'�-''SrCti�=`n`-�r„',�7`e�wrc . � \ Photo 1. The steep slope behind the proposed Timber Ridge redevelopment site presents a severe rockfall hazard. (11/25/09). ^ �---- �, � f � '� -'"p . v- �i� r ;t�;r ' � �. r"' ' ` , , ,- . `� ;� 1 :� ��,�4 � . �� Y.� � �, Y� f � �f t #�• •-i��' ` Y .. {"' ; t v� 0 . % �,.� .�s �� { � .. �� .. �,�.:� .....,;+i:..._. . . ' G :�',A E' � °.i " � '' :,r�° .. :.�`�.,, � ,_ -. y , . - :� � � '� f �rl�` �..:, ',tap+' �,• ��. . 2 �... ' S � .Ji,d•�• � �� - _ � � � F "�S: � ;�.r � ��:.-. �� - � � s -:%'�!'+wy.. �� `� Y �S � �': v �h . :� � � . �' .: ._._. - _+ ^�' ° r � ��,—.�,�y� _ _ .� .. ; _ �+ . k ,� , _v a ... . � ' . . ,I--._ .. \.� N �i /�:5�'F V } �r+^�°�� ♦ \ ..; ��, _ �4 ,� _ � �n' 4, � � x �: �� .. ,� r ,�,�'.� ? . � .�-�. � ` _ _ --- �. r . � � . , _ , .� � , _ T �_ j i M , s �� k - > ^>, � ... � r. ' - � ., ��..._.. " 9 n:J�.- F ', � ... -,. , � :..'+s � Photo 2. i ne northwest edge ot the l�imber Ridge project site is mapped as a High Severity Rockfall Hazard Zone by the Town of Vail. (11/25/09). 25 � ` � b � � A � � a � x�s �. �� .�u��.o .. . , , "'..`�' �� (� � �` �r � _ . a , q �' +'�` . _ �� # .. � ' . . � � �:4 � . ,t �`��. t .. �. a�, .. �: ' fi' •.�,. � �� :�� s:. �+ � � � �' ` � 1§ #y{ t .x+: iA��1• ��"�. . , , . , ';:n� � i . �a � ti � � �� -�°� ; ;� ��, . ,y. � , .. . . . . , �� {�. � r� � .- ... ,. ��% _ � ak .. -r �., «, -�-. � � �,,: � ��. '�, :�;,,,� s. A c►i`; 'Y ��::,' . .3.._e_.._. ,....�..,. � _..�..s. ..f.. :� �o.....�,.u.� . � . � . _� _: �..- — �-: � _ . - . . ;. -... .� . ..+<.ti�. _� .�`_ . . .. = ��' _ _ - - � - X - � - . ' _ � � - ' ;s-,. ' � � . , " � _ - _:.` � � �� ~ �� -.c�. � ' , ^ .-c°-�._ � . �:� .-. < � .- �� °_ �r9l� .�. �,� "�i.. _ _ ..'� �._ � . � :�.a '�. _.;� �_ - _... _ _ �- _-e= � .. k '=� �. .. k . ^. . -. " -. • , _ �. ' ';. r.._,,.,. ,.,:g:y �.:,. �_ .. ` _. . .. - �a r .i+- � { -__ _ _ _ � -- ' ' � —_ — .,._ — � Photo 3. Ornamental landscaping surrounds the existing Timber Ridge apartment buildings. � (11/25/09). � , � �e � � � � s ■ �� _ � �` �.. ��`;. . . �_' . ` 'n} ' . - � , �� :.�� . ' . . � _�� t_...' >>s• � a+� � : -. �� . � , :�P�aS�• , . �,_ k,. ,�� . �. � a � d � ' � �» t,�' '� . '� ,.i. � t '+ � Ni� �� .'aar�� t"s f k , �` �# rr�i S3� `�w� ' %� �. ; �� ` : ar ��wi '4 ,, ,, _ . .�, : - . . � � } `� „;� .. ' ... � .. _, ,,t .�µ � : :,° � i�i�. y,� a '�;� i � r�` 9` �: ��' � +°2�i; �` � ' � ��'�$��4;� ,y8� � �� . i. a. - . . �n+��. q ' `a°'+a4 ��, "h A�.. ��` 'y " }'`� ..v ;, , $� . � ��'��1:: ~i' .'?�`` �' .� ,�+...�. �c��.,'( :k .. � . ��.d �1 f�l� n, `. • � . _ �� ;�.• � Photo 4. The slope between the existing buildings and Lion's Ridge Loop Road is dominated by introduced grasses and weedy forbs. (11/25/09). 26 f� 8.0 References Chick, Nancy. 2009. December 1, 2009 correspondence to Heather Houston of Western Ecological Resource. HP Geotech. 2009. Ceologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Rockfall Risk and Mitigation Study, Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project, 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail Colorado. Prepared for: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC. Prepared by: Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, October 27, 2009. HP Geotech. 2009. Ceotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Timber Ridge Redevelopment, 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado. Prepared for: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC, October 27, 2009. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2010. Traffic Impact Study, Timber Ridge. Prepared for: Town of Vail. Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Dever Colorado, )anuary 2010. ' ' � � ' ' ' ' , 27 W� LJ � , ' � ' ' ' � ' ' ' � ' � � Appendix A. Correspondence from Nancy Chick, CDPHE 28 , I.,;� � ' sTAT� oF coLor��a Bill Ritter, Jr., Governor - Ned Calonge, M.D., Interim Executive Director �;pF•�o10 � .�,Ry� Dedicatod to protecting and improving the health and onvirqnment of the people of Cobrado y� "� .' o a300 Gherry Creek Or. S. Laboratory Senrices Division •``'� ' �' . +t,::; .:.>� . Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 5700 Lowry Bivd. � -%, �R76 . Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 8023o-6928 _ - - ___ _ ._ .__. TDD Line (303) 691-7700 (303) 692-3090 Colorado Deparcmcnt Located in Glendale, Coinrado of Public t �ealth http://www.cdphe.state.co.us anci F.nvironment Fieatherliouston Western Ecolo�;ical Resource Via �:mail: hcather rx,wcstcrncco.com December 1, 2009 Uear Ms. I-iouston, You requested background pollutant concentratian estimates for an Enviranmental Impact Assessment f�r the Vail Timber Ridge project at 1280 North Fro�tage Road, West Vail. 1:xcept for PM��, local air monitoring data does not e�cist for Vail. Therefore, I havc devcloped best estimatcs bascd on �fher data our agcncy has. ��he estimates and the basis for each are given in the "I'able belnw. Pollutant Averaging Time 5tandard Estimate Data Source PMIO Annual Mcan SO ug/m3 I S uglm3 Vail, 1996, 1999, 2�00. 24 Hour Second Maximum PMZ.s Annual Aritlunetic Mean 98`n percentile Of 24 Hour Averages Lead Running 3-month Average NOZ Annua] Mcan CO 1 Hvur Sec�nd Maximum 8 Hour Second Maximum 150 ug/m3 I S ug/m3 35 ug/m3 0.15 ug/m3 .053 ppm 35 ppm 9 ppm 3S ug/m3 9 ug/m3 Grand Junction, 2003- 2006. 24 ug/m3 .0092 ug/m3 Denvcr Municipal Aninnal Shelter, 2007-204R. 016 ppm Woodmen F,xit in Calarada Sprin�s, 2003, 2405 — 2006. 4 ppm Grand Juncti�n, 2004-2046. 2 ppm , � � Pollutant Averaging Time SOZ Annual Mean 3 Hour Second Maximum 24 Hour Second Maximum Qzoac Old Standard 1 hour 2nd Maximum New Standard 8 Hour �ourth Maximum Standard .430 ppm .500 ppm ] 4U ppm 12 ppm 075 ppm Estimatc Data Source 002 ppm Woodmen Exit in Coiorado Sprin�s, 2003, 2005 — 2006. .025 ppm 013 ppm .081 ppm .066 ppm Rifle, 2008. , Please note that these values are conservative indicators of ambient concentrations developed f'or internal use by the Division in initial screening models for permit applications. They are not suitable for applications beyand that scope of use. `I�he Ambient Background Concen[ration summary values werc generatcd through an arialysis of the ambient monitored data thai are available to the llivision. The quantity af data is sometimes limited and may be of' uncertain quality. Therefore, the ambient concentration background values do not necessarily represent quantitative indicators of ambient air quality and should not be used in instances where such information is necessary. The Ambient Background Concenirations - ]. Do not necessarily substitute for on-site monitoring data. 2. Indicate the ambient pollution leve(s in general gEOgraphic areas, not a specific lacation. `I'his is particulazly true for particulate concentration values. 3. Are subject to change without notice as new information is acquired. � When the Ambient Back�,nound Concentrations are to be quotcd outside of Division use, they should be accompanied by an appropriate citation indicating their source and their limitations. " Refcrencing this l�tter would be adeguate, but an expanded explanation is suggcsted. I hope this information is useful. If you have further questions, I can be reached at 303-692- �� 3226. Sincerely, i�ty;�~.c,., � ��<° ��.. Nancy �D. Chick Environmental Protection Specialist Air Pollution Control Division (::1Background ConclVailabe.duc �� ' r � MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: January 11, 2010 SUBJECT: A request for a work session for review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code to allow for the redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 359 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation Planner: George Ruther I. SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman, of Pylman & Associates, are requesting a work session with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to present the proposed redevelopment plans for the redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, located at 1280 North Frontage Road. Presentation and discussion topics include: • A presentation of the revised preliminary plan set (site plan, landscape plan, grading plan, building elevations, etc.) • A summary of the next steps in the development review process II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicants are proposing to redevelop the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Apartments development site and construct a five-story tall building extending 800 feet along the North Frontage Road (Attachment A— Vicinity Map). The new building will contain up to 359 new employee housing units capable of housing 570 employees with the existing western half of the site remaining operational throughout the redevelopment process. A new five-level enclosed parking garage will be constructed on the site along with improved public transit facilities to meet the minimum parking and transportation needs of the development. As this is a work session, the applicants and staff are not requesting a final review at this time. Instead, the Commission is being asked to actively engage in a presentation and discussion about the proposed project. As such, the staff recommends that the Commission provides direction on the following questions: . The applicants shall be required to submit a complete application to the Town of Vail Community Development for review. According to the Zoning Regulations, the Administrator may require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samples, and other materials if deemed necessary to properly evaluate a proposaf. Are there any additional submittal materials that the Commission requires of the applicants to ensure that the proposal can be properly evaluated? III. DISCUSSION TOPICS Open House Summary On December 30, 2009, the Town of Vail Community Development Department hosted an open house to share the proposed redevelopment plans with the community. Approximately 25-30 people attended the one hour long meeting. The following is a summary of the public input received: • What impacts will the proposed level of density have on the Town's bus service? • What impacts will the proposed level of density have on the demand for existing deed-restricted rental units already existing in town? • Do the future residents of Timber Ridge need to live or work in the Town of Vail? • The 5,000 square foot clubhouse amenities only add to the bulk and mass of the building. Should the Town of Vail be subsidizing a"health club" for residents of affordable housing projects? • What is the impact of the pre-development agreement executed between the Vail Town Council and Vail Timber Ridge, LLC? • The north elevation as presently proposed and designed looks more like a prison than a residential apartment building. • The proposed building is too large as a result of a very aggressive program. • The public transit stop improvements are much needed. • Will the existing encroachment on the Savoy Villas property be remedied as a result of the redevelopment project? � Are the new residential units for sale or for rent? What is proposed for the western one-half of the Timber Ridge site. • Moving the bulk and mass from the east to the west appears to be a great solution for matching the character and scale of the neighborhood. • What level of vacancy presently exists at the Timber Ridge and Middle Creek? Revised Plans The applicant has been before the Town of Vail Design Review Board and the Planning and Environmental Commission for several conceptual review and worksession discussions. An open house was hosted to share the project with the community to gain public comment on the project. Additionally, the staff and the applicant have spent a significant amount of time working through many of the technical aspects of the projects. As a result, the applicant has revised the proposed plans to respond to the input and feedback received. The following bullets highlight the revisions made to the plans to date: • The two-way drive aisle with parallel parking along the south edge of the building has 2 � been eliminated and replaced with a twenty-foot wide, combined fire lane an pedestrian/bike path. As a result, the amount of asphalt and other impervious area has been reduced and the amount of landscape area has been increased. • The existing public transit stop has been reconfigured to improved increased bus transit capabilities and capacity to the entire Timber Ridge site. • The retaining wall configuration and design has been modified to reduce the steepness of the slope on the north side of the parking garage, reduce the amount of exposed building fa�ade and increase opportunities for landscaping to break down the visible mass of the buildinc� and screen the top deck of the parking garage from public view. • The bulk and mass of the proposed building has been reduced on the east end of the project and displaced to the west end of the project to improve the compatibility of � the new building with the existing buildings located at Savoy Villas. • The outdoor courtyard located next to the clubhouse has been enclosed on the ground level of the building. • The retaining wall heights have been increased along the north side of the building. As a result, a variance application for wall heights in excess of six feet tall will be submitted for review and consideration. Geologic Hazard and Rockfall Mitigation Report According to the Official Town of Vail Hazard Maps, the proposed development site is located with a high severity rockfall hazard zone. Pursuant to Chapter 12-21, Hazard Regulations, Vail Town Code, "If the finding of the engineer or geologist performing the site specific geologic investigation is that the site is a geologically sensitive area, but that corrective engineering or engineered construction or other mitigation or alterations can be accomplished so that there is no increased hazard to other property or structures, or to public buildings, roads, streets, rights of way, easements, utilities or facilities, the issuance of a building or grading permit shall be conditional and contingent upon approval of plans for corrective engineering or engineered construction or ofher mitigation or alterations as set forth in this Section. " The applicant has submitted a preliminary geologic site assessment and preliminary rockfall risk and mitigation study to the Community Development Department. The site assessment concludes that the proposed development site is in fact located within a geologically sensitive rockfall hazard area, and as such, corrective engineering or engineered construction or other mitigation or alterations are required. In the preliminary mitigation study, the geologic engineer recommends four options for mitigating the rockfall hazard. Of the four corrective engineering options, one option is onsite and three options are off-site on town owned open space land. At this time, a preferred method and location has not yet been selected. Regardless, none of the options recommended by the geologic engineer require changes or alterations to the proposed building. A final option will be selected and proposed prior to final review of the redevelopment application. � 3 IV Next Steps The applicant has submitted a development review appiication to the Town of Vail Community Development for review. The final review of the application by the Planning and Environmental Commission is currently scheduled for Monday, February 8, 2010 and by the Design Review Board on February 17, 2010. As an immediate next step in the review process, the town staff will review the application for completeness and compliance with the applicable Town Codes. Further, the Vail Town Council will be provided a progress update at their regularly schedule public hearings on both January 19 and March 2, 2010. SITE ANALYSIS Address: Legal Description: Zoning: Land Use Plan Designation: Current Land Use: Lot Size: Geologically Sensitive Areas Develoqment Standard Min. Lot Area: Min. Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Max. Building Height: Max. GRFA: Max. Site Coverage: Min. Landscape Area: 1280 North Frontage Road Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Filing No. 1 Housing District Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Dwellings 5.24 acres/ 228,254 square feet High Severity Rockfall Required determined by PEC 20' (north) 20' (east) 20' (west) 20' (south) determined by PEC determined by PEC 55% unless at least 75% of parking is covered and approved by the PEC 30% Proposed 228,254 sq. ft(5.24 acres) 25' (north) 20' (east) 50' (west) 54' (south) TBD 252,994 sq. ft. 91,100 sq. ft. (41 %) 68,736 sq. ft. (30%) Min. Parking: Per Chapter 10 (693 spaces), 547 spaces or a max. 25% reduction (520 spaces) approved by the PEC based upon the Parking Management Plan provided 4 r ! � � l �'' V. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Current Land Use Zoninq Land Use Desiqnation North: Residential Two-Family Primary/Secondary Low Density Residential South: Interstate 70 ROW Not Zoned Not Designated East: Residential High Density Multiple Family High Density Residential Residential West: US Postal Service High Density Multiple Family High Density Residential Residential VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As this is a work session, staff will not be making a recommendation at this time. Staff will provide a formal recommendation prior to the final review of the development review applications. VII. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map 5 0 u T�rr�b�r Ric�g� Apartm+�r�ts Lots 9-5, Blaek G, Lians Ridge Filing 1 (928p Narth Frr,nfage Road West) �',;��` L;�:.. ,h �� Subj�ctProp�rty �: � FFet � ,...r,�, _, ,.,..� „„ ...,. a,, .,.� . .e... .„ ... ..�. � ..,. ll 1S0 300 6U0 L� trru�lr � C�.erncar 1�i'2� �� ❑ � TIMBER RIDGE TAP FEE CALCULATION 1 /13/2010 WATER TAP FEES 2010 RATES SEWEH TAP FEE52o10 RATES ERWSD TFEADTED WATER �. LEVEL 1 S3.7a PER S�F7 52.97 PER SOFT STORAGE FEE St,225 PER SFE UNIT UNIT TYPE AREA/ UNIT (SF) SFE/UNITS PER FLH SF / FLOOR �i q58.a3 $1,16i.v $1,225.00 A1 EU 391 1 391 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 � RU 527 0 0 A2 3,879 $14,468.67 $11,520.63 $7,350.00 A3 RU 647 6 RU 806 5 4,028 $15,022.58 $11,961.68 $6,125.00 81 1,785 $3,330.89 $2,65221 $1,225.00 82 RU 893 2 B2-TOP RU 990 � O GRANDFATHERED 9 SFE'S/UNITS RU 926 8 7,410 83-1 ST � 83 RU 960 � GRANDFATHEREOONISFE/UNIT 17493 �4+28�.57 $27,295•�9 $�5�925.�� TOTAL SF-UNITS FOR 92 UNIT TYPE 13,206 Circulation Space 30,699 TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 22 LEVEL2 WATEi7TAPFEES2o1oRATES SEWEFTAPFEES401oRATES ERWSOTflEADTEDWATER $3.73 PER SaFT S2.B7 PEH SOFT STORAGE FEE 51,225 PEP SFE UNIT UNIT TYPE AREA / UNIT (SF) SFE/UNITS PER FLR SF / FLOOR A1 EU 391 4 1,564 $5,833.72 $4,645.08 $4,900.00 A2 RU 527 20 10,540 $39,314.20 $31,303.80 $24,500.0 A3 RU 647 8 5,172 $19,291.56 $15,360.84 $9,800.0 61 RU 806 16 14,499 $54,081.27 $43,062.03 $22,050.00 82 RU 893 10 8,926 B2-TOP RU 99� � � GRANDFATHERED 20 SFE'S/UNITS RU 926 2 1,853 B3-1 ST 7, 681 B3 RU 960 g 50,234 $118,520.75 $94,371.75 $61,250.00 TOTAL SF-UNITS Circulation Space 9,078 TOTAL 2ND FLOOR 70 59,313 LEVEL3 WATERTAPFEE52o10RATES SEWERTAPFEE52010RATE5 ERWSDTREADTEDWATER $3.73 PER SOFT 52.97 PER SOFT STORAGE FEE 51.Y25 PER SFE UNIT UNIT TYPE AREA / UNIT (SF) SFE/UNI75 PER FLR SF / FLOOR A1 EU 391 5 1955 $7,292.15 $5,806.35 $6,125.00 A2 R� 52� 2p 10 540 $39,31420 $31,303.80 $24,500.00 A3 RU 647 8 5,172 $19,291.56 $15,360.84 $9,800.00 B1 RU 806 18 14,499 $54,08127 $43,062.03 $22.050.00 82 RU 893 10 8,926 82-TOP RU 99� � � GRANDFATHERED 22 SFE'S/UNITS RU 926 0 0 B3-1ST 1 � 52� B3 RU 960 12 52,613 $119,979.18 $95,533.02 $62,475.00 TOTAL SF-UNITS COMMON AREA 9'182 TOTAL 3RD FLOOR 73 61,795 LEVEL4 WATERTAPFEE52010RATES SEWEflTAPFEE52o70FATE5 ERWSDTREADTEDWATER ;3.73 PER SOFT 52.97 PEH SOFT STORAGE FEE 51,225 PER SFE UNIT UNIT TYPE AREA / UNIT (SF) SFE/UNITS PER FLR SF / FLOOR A1 EU 391 5 1,955 $7,292.15 $5,806.35 $6,125.00 A2 RU 527 20 10,540 $39,314.20 $31,303.60 $24,500.00 A3 RU 647 8 5,172 $19,291.56 $15,360.84 $9,800.00 B1 RU 806 18 14,499 $54,081.27 $43,062.03 $22,050.00 82 RU 893 10 8,926 82-TOP RU 990 � � GRANDFATHERED 22 SFE'S/UNITS RU 926 0 0 83-iST �� 52� 83 RU 960 12 52,613 $119,979.18 $95,533.02 $62,475.00 TOTAL SF-UNITS COMMON AREA 9'�SZ TOTAL 4TH FLOOR 73 6Y,795 LEVEL5 WATERTAPFEES2010RATES SEWERTAPFEE52070RATES ERWSOTREADTEDWATER 53.73 PER SOFT 52.97 PEN SOFT STOMGE FEE E1,225 PEfl SFE UNIT UNIT TYPE AREA / UNIT (SF) SFE/UNITS PER FLR SF / FLOOR A1 EU 391 4 1,564 $5,833.72 $4,645.08 $4,900.00 A2 RU 527 20 10,540 $39,314.20 $31,303.80 $24,500.0 A3 RU 647 8 5,172 $19,291.56 $15,360.84 $9,800. g� RU 806 18 14,499 $54,081.27 $43,062.03 $22,050.00 B2 RU 893 10 8,926 82-TOP RU 99� � � GRANDFATHERED 19 SFE'S/UNITS 63-1 ST RU 926 0 0 B3 RU 960 9 8,641 49,342 $118,520.75 $94,371.75 $61,250.00 TOTAL SF-UNITS COMMON AREA 9�109 TOTAL 5TH FLOOR 69 58,450 LEVEL6 WATERTAPFEE52010RATES SEWERTAPFEES201aRATES EHWSDTREADTEDWATER ;3.73 PEH SOFT E2.97 PER S�FT STORAGE FEE 51,425 PER SFE UNIT UNIT TYPE AREA / UNIT (SF) SFE/UNITS PER FLR SF / FLOOR A1 EU 391 3 1,173 �4,37529 $3,483.81 $3,675.00 RU 527 20 10,540 $39,314.20 $31,303.80 $24,500. A2 $0.00 $0.00 A3 RU 647 0 0 $0.00 B1 RU 806 12 9,666 $36,054.18 $28,708.02 $14,700.0 82 RU 893 4 3 570 RU 99� 4 3,96� GRANDFATHERED 10 SFE/UNITS B2-TOP 0 B3 1 ST RU 926 0 R�/ 960 2 1,920 B3 30,830 $79,743.67 $63,495.63 $42,875.00 TOTAL SF-UNITS 5 S74 COMMON AREA TOTAL 6TH FLOOR 45 36,703 F'\15W50\3cus„GSR AcctWak�2010ACCIMahi�iTIM9ERRI�GETapFeaGalctls � A1 � Residential TIMBER RIDGE TAP FEE CALCULATION 1/13/2010 PROJECT TOTALS WATERTAPFEE52otORATES SEWERTAPFEE52o10qATES ERWSDTFEADTEDWATER TYPE AREA / UNIT (SF) SFE�S SF / UNIT TYPE $3.73 PEq S�Ff $p.97 PER S�FT STORAGE FEE $1,225 PER SFE U 391 22 'U 8,602 $sz,oes.as 527 100 Szs.sazea szs.9so aa 'U 52,700 Siss,s�i.ao 647 38 $156,519.00 $izz,soo.00 24�567 $91,fi36.91 iU 806 g9 $72.963.99 $46,550.00 71,690 $zs�.aoi.ea $ziz,sn.ez 'V 893 Sioe,ozs.00 46 41.059 ...,..,...__ RU DV 43 41,285 352 253,726 55,631 2.6 354.6 308,756 TOTAL GRANDFATHERED f02 SFE'S/UNITS $591,024.10 $470,600.96 $306,250.0 $20,783.00 $17,645.00 $3,185.00 $611,807.10 �48a_�as oa c.,,,.. ..,� .. ��1 �'� . . �..._ �. .�. . + � � �'R tr�.►M.�..�'t: ` l • �V� "�� -�o��-►oJ T�.�� yuu� HELTON 8� WILLIAMSEN P C 'S��G"'� �� t�� ONSULTING ENGINEERS IN WATER.RESOURCES �, 384 Inverness Parkway, Suite 144 Englewood, Colorado 80112-5822 Phone (303) 792-2161 Fax (303) 792-2165 ` ��,�,nq.i./ 5�.�-��,�-L E-mail: twilliamsen@helton-williamsen.com � Date: January 12, 2010 To: Andy Strehler From: Tom Williamsen Subject: Timber Ridge Apartments MEMORANDUM 5��o Z - ;�-��w� ��`a 5 �,cs��..�� t - S�u�►'o r--...�-.a2v� � ,� As requested, I have calculated the cash-in-lieu of water rights dedication amount for the Timber Ridge Apartments project based on the information provided in the water demand worksheet that was submitted by Arthur Morton dated December 9, 2009, and discussions with Glen Palmer of Alpine Engineers, representing the developer. The project is a re-development of the existing apartment complex. There will be 352 apartments, 0.40 acre of irrigated landscape, and 5,525 square feet clubhouse which includes office space, lobby, fitness area, and club area. The fitness area will include an 8,500 gallon spa tub. The existing facility includes 102 apartments. I calculated the incremental water demands for the 250 apartments (352 - 102 = 250) and for 0.28 acre of landscape (prorated based on the number of additional apartment units), and the clubhouse as additional water demands on the system and based the water rights dedication requirements on the incremental increase. I increased the water demands for the clubhouse from the value shown on the water demand worksheet to account for multiple fillings of the spa tub based on my discussion with Mr. Palmer. Following are the incremental water demand and consumptive use amounts: �Q� l.lt.�i� Ot'�'L.�. ( c�o CZ �+�� ot�►� = ? 1 �� - Use �GZ''� ��u�j Apartments Irrigation Clubhouse Total Demand (af/vr) 84.0 o.� 1_1 85.8 Consumptive Use af/ r 4.20 0.56 0.08 4.84 If cash-in-lieu of water rights dedication is accepted by ERWSD the cash-in-lieu amount would be $80,852. The water demand worksheet and cash-in-lieu calculator are attached. Enclosure �� f'-� Z�� C� uri I �-� ��ur�e cc: Glenn Porzak w/enclosure �,�� T'~�i t�}`►D�.J �O �- vYl c:\2010-01-12 Memo to AStrehler re Timber Ridge Apartments.doc C'►�,� C,�,�r.� z � IS� w�vk�2 �� c�hms �� c+R rzv►�1C-�-rf' w � �1 0� • � �{o ,�� . l.l l,.bDi� � i%{`l,.tq { � s� � WATER RIGHTS DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS OR CASH IN LIEU �r Eagle River Water 8 Sanitation District (values in acre-feet} Note to Applicant: This worksheet to be completed by ERW&SD personnel. Project Name: Timber Rid e A rtments Wastewater treated at Vail VWVTP? (Yes or No): Yes � Com nent Jan Feb Mar A r Ma ' Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Total Residential Indoor Usage 7.13425 I 6.44384 I�' 7.13425 6.90411 7.13425 I 6.90411 7.13425 7.13425 �I 6.90411 �I 7.13425 6.9d411 I 7.13425 84.00000 Other Indoor Usage 0.09342 0.08438 0.09342 0.09041 ' 0.09342 0.09041 0.09342 O.d9342 0.0�41 0.09342 0.09041 O.Q9342 1.10000 Irrigation Usage 0.00000 0.00000 ' 0.00000 0.00000 0.10063 ' 0.15750 0.17938 0.14438 0.10063 0.01750 0.00000 0.00000 0.70000 Other Outdoor Usage Total Demand 7.22767 ' 6.52822 7.22767 6.99452 7.32830 ' 7.15202 7.40705 7.37205 , 7.09515 , 7.24517 6.99452 ' 7.22767 85.80001 Total Consumptive Use 0.36138 I'' 0.32641 I 0.36138 0.34973 0.44189 0.47573 0.50489 0.47689 I 0.43023 I! 0.37538 0.34973 I 0.36138 4.81502 Dedication R uirement 120% 0.43366 0.39169 0.43366 0.41968 II 0.53027 I 0.57088 I 0.60587 0.57227 ' 0.51628 I' 0.45046 0.41968 0.43366 5.77806 e9 @ Cash in Lieu of Water Rights Payment: $80,852 Row description: Residential indoor use: The annual total comes from cell "C49" in the "AnnualWorksheeY'. The annual amount is distributed monthly based on number of days in month. Other Indoor Usage: The annual total comes from cell "E101" in the AnnualWorksheet. The annual amount is distributed monthly based on number of days in month. Irrigation usaye: The annual total comes from cell "C69" in the "Annual/WorksheeY'. The annual amount is distributed monthly based on the ratio of estimated monthly consumptive otner outdoor usage: The annual total comes from section 3 of the "AnnualWorksheeY'. The annual amount is distributed monthly depending on the type of other use and must be 7otal Demand: Sum of the 4 use types. Total consumptive use: Monthly Indoor use x 5% + Irrigation Use x 80% + Outdoor Use (dependent on specific use). Dedication Requirement: 120% x Total consumptive use. Cash in Lieu of Water Rights Payment DedlCatlOn Requifement X$6,000 in May, June, July and August and x$19,200 in January, February, March, April, September, October, November and December. Notes: The values used in the Cash in Lieu calculation are taken from the most recent ERWSD Resolution on Water Dedication Policy amended January 24, 2008. Preceding descriptians and notes added February 7, 2008 by TAW. 1/12/2010 WaterDemWksht CashinLieu Calculator 2010 TimberRidge taw 3 a � �r� WATER DEMAIVt1 WORKSHEE7 Eagle fiiver Water & Sanitation Dlstrlct Llpper Eagle Regiona! NlaYer Autharity Nole ta Applipnt: Please rAmplate all (ntormafion hiphllghted In blue. Addttional cAmmenis ta be entered an the Comments vdorksheet. � � Pro)ect Nama: rmber Ri a A ar;ments Contact Persan: I.ee ThomaslArthur MoRon (Va11 Tlmber Ridq@ 41,C), George Rufher_Sl'own of Vail Telephane: �21A) 349•79D0 1303) 475-BL118 (970) A79-2138 Date: '�� pescripGon of Proposed Prq)ec[: �edevelopment of ihe Eastem Half of ihe Timber RldgeAp9riment Compiex (Bufldings A-q, a2rso Nor1h Frontaga Road, Vall. CO 80209 L.ocatlon of Proposed Pm)ett (qtr qtr section, tovrnship, range, Ipt�ling) (Attach tegal descriplion): LpTB 1 THRDUGH 6, A R�SUBDMSION OF LION'S RIDOE SUBOiVtSION BLbCK C- TOVIrN OF VAII, �A(3LE COUNTY, COLORADO Total Area (square feet or B24 Acres Has Yhla area been annexed to a metropolitan �strlCt ar town4 Yes X No If yes, identlfy: Town of Vail IS this proj�et a redevelopment of exlsttng lots artd structures? Yes X No If yss, identlfy 6y wateNaewer billing address: 1280 North Frontage Road, Vall, CA 81657 w1..R�31�EN�lA1_ENb00R'VIiA`f�1��bEMANp .� � � �;_ �:.. �. ":? ., r,,:, .. .. -., .. �,.:,.;_., �ir.'r".� .. , ,,. , . . . `I ` 4 i A. Dateched �i�gie famlly lots (number): Aaerapelotsize: squareFeet 8. Average Tltsorarea of house: �, square fset (inclusive of garage and unfinished basernent� C. Oreater vf A or a x s! 3,D00: 0.0 s�ngle famity squivalents (8 FEs) fl. In�ouse demand [A x 0.3921 j: 0 acre-feet per year E.. MuIH-famlly units (numlxxrj: % � 2"�-'i� f� i; "y �` Z� 0 w,�a.'�5 hR'i� (inclusive of ck�plPx, condomirdum, and aparimenl units) F. Average floor area of unit: QnClu�tve ot garage and unfinlshed basement) G. Greatar af E or E x F 7 3,000: F{. (n.heuse dantand {E x 0.3360�: I. Total In-houee demand i0 + H): 352 719 SqUare feet 352.0 9�gfBi8111ity eqUiV�[ente (5FE5) ' 116.27 aae•teet per year ++�yy �` �,,,T,/,� �.p� .Mu'�� .� - 4i 116,27 ecre-feet per year �'�� FA75WSO18(�gslAbiUSrvlNbW��➢h1a�77nberNidpoaolwdertrM12.9-09.vlmirqnnuoMbik+Mad} P�ge 7 of4 FoimOoro: Mny2064 � E�roject Name: Timber Rid A rtments �2: I�2RIGAT19N,wAT�R�DF_R9ANn ";'f , , .'r` --,': ", ::: ,�;' - , .. . . _ A. Averape irrigafed area per detached sin�lfe iumily ]ot: B. IMgated aroa (1A x 2A J 43,660): G, Average irrigated area per muiti-famlly uolt: p, IrrlgateQ area (tE x 2C ! 43,560}; E. Othertrrlgated areas: i. irrigatcd park§ 2. Errigated entry featureg 1. Irrigatad atreet ROW 4. Common epace 5. Total other F. Total trrigated areas j2B + 2D + 2E5}: d. Tota� irrigation demand (2F x 2.5): Destri6a irrlgatlon methoda �sprinkler, d�ip, etc.�: squ8refeet D.DO acres 5o aquere teet � D.40 acres K��-� -.- P.7. �� fr* �'1i`'"°` �� acres '"""`°- acres acres aeres O.OU aGtes o.aa acres 1A� acre-feel �' ,�, �i��`� � ,. -.: .�-.. '.:;� �.��, .1JA'.6� F '..;;:i, :: rR' �` � :�� /� �" :.:. . .. . . ..�7� % �� _ .� .. _.. _ . : .-. ; ._, . . , i3 07HBt�0U1;�4ORWATER;lJ5E.5 ,':' .,,. ;" � � - . ,.,- i� _ ,' , 3 �/L s"�2„ -- l �l $ L e�f �� ✓� �' s� . � � �1 �°� A. Porrd water suKace erea: squere feet ��, B. Fauntaln water sarTace area: square feet C. Swimming poo1: 1. Sorface area 342 �square (eet 2, Volume s 8,6ti0 gallons �y � .- A ( r .l��0' � tJ'�-C'�!!;3 �.�', ,�' � ' �. �' �"'G,.1 �' � p�/ � g�'`' •�'� (r'' o � 9 ,�i a.'aa,�+✓�a, .. ,._.. . :.... . . . ... .. . . . . ;;,> , , �, t;� � �. :�:��,°° .�,._ a ?OTHER`II�oUR�WATER,.U.sES � , , : . , 1 , , �,. �..a,, . „ . . , Annua! Rsquirement ' Type (acre-feet) A. P,oWi[ �5quare feet x 0.0�0112) square fest 0.00 0,10 gpd/sqlt B. ORlce (squ�*e #eeY x a.000179) 5,525 square ieet 0.9fl ✓ 0,15 gpd/sqft C. Warehouse or storage (square ieet x O.00OD672) ___ eQuer�+ ieet �.OD 0.08 gpd/sqR D. Motetlhotei withouE kttehens {raome x 0.1720} ��___, ______�, �esS raoms O.aD 100 gpolroom E, rybte!lhotel wiih kitehcns trooms x D.1860► guest �ooms 0,00 1 b� gpdrroom F. Restaura�t (seats x Q.0392► seafa 0.00 35 gptlJSeat G. 7avrem _ _�seats 0.0� 7.4g�xllsest H. Other (dasaribe) -------"�"^'"""""" The Clubhouse (wltich contalns o�ce, tobby, Gtrisss and cluh areas has been assumed to faA und�r OfFicB fa' calculatlon " % f t] Z. !. Tota! other indoor usage U.99 t' U, 18 2" � Oeseribe below Ihe expected number of employeaelguestsldeily haurs and enyfhing thai impacts the numher oi qeopla us�ng the facilities or special fPeture such as swlmmfng pools, h� �bs, or ott�er Indoor water featares (use the Comments workeheet if more space fs n�ded): F115YV�Y8Ra0�dM5iriM�taiNo�d�nLr�EetRWqewolarrm�riaMt7�0�o8.xoa{P.rnnia�Wn+k+hoeq Page2ofA FamOato� Mey 2005 � projccf Name: Timper R�e Apartmants ;G ,AVERAGEANNUALCpNSUMPTlVEaU$AOE:(FOR ER�l11&5D STqFF�USF) r `' ' . , , ,. . . .. u A. lr�door usage B. lrriaation usaae C_ TOTAL pernarx9 Consumpilve Use (acra-feet) (acre-feet) 119.26 5.96 1.00 U.60 72D.26 6.76 , � .. . �_:, .. .w.._ . , . . .::�.. ' ...'��-�� ..... , ..:.,. ..a �, ..... . •,.: ��. rAPPLICAt+tT ' ' : -.,.�;.�r .,,. .,. ... .'��-� ProjeCt Name: Tjmb�f Ritl9C F�qBrfmBntS ey: pBte• / ��/ /O �' -- , . .. _ �D15TRlCT`ir " ' , - Yerified By: (ERW&SD Employee) Dete: �1lselafiner: EagSe River Waler & SanitaNOn oisprict and Upper �a�le Reginnal WaterAuthor�ry retaia the hght to revlse the faclors and cash-in-fieu payrnenis. F;175VJ.'tdRRapsUb�ISMYl4lmrfiiphlelTmRorRldpewatordemundl2•P-0O.M�fAnnueMkrlohualy F'age3of4 Fa.moqx:n+oyzaos �I �Ui , � t�yuu�. 6 i ( �.Z Eagle River Water & Sanitation District Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority Draft January 13, 2009 Developer Approval Process Developers of property proposing to receive service for new water uses (not previously approved by the District or Authority), must complete the District/Authority Developer Approval Process in order to receive service from the District's water and wastewater systems or the Authority's water system. The process is described below and includes: 1) Inclusion into service area boundaries; 2) water rights dedication; and 3) infrastructure approvaL Points where the District/Auth�rity`s appr�val �rc�cess ir�t�rfaces with the �ariri Use AuthQrity`s approval process arE highli�ht�d in blue. Connection to the water and wastewater systems for service is accomplished through a separate business process which starts when a New Account Application is submitted by a Customer. First Contact • Staff works closely with Land Use Authorities (LUAs) so that the District is aware of new development proposals early in the developer's land use approval process. �l�As s�nd a fc�r r��71 notific_atior� ta the District/Autl�ority that a new proposed development i�as submittecl a SI<eTch Pl�rn application. Staff collects information about the developer and property, creates a file to track progress through the process . 4taff rneeks with �UA to disct�s� issuPSJscheclul�/approval {�r��eess ii�te��fi�ace pc�ints. . Linn reports project to Board along with developer's intent for conveyance of water rights (cash- in-lieu, water rights dedication, already covered under existing augmentation plan, combination of above) . Construction Review Team (CRT) generates an Initial Letter to the developer outlining the District/Authority developer approval process Inclusion . District/Authority requires that new areas requesting service be included in the appropriate water and sewer service boundaries . The CRT investigates status of inclusion into applicable service boundaries . Inclusion into the Authority service area is accomplished through the member metropolitan district (Marchetti's office is the contact) or the Town of Avon . Inclusion into the District requires application, a$1000 fee and Board approval . Once a property is included into the District boundary, an Inclusion Letter is generated and copied ta the �UR. An inclusion letter states only that the property is now located within the boundary and does not commit the District to serve or address water rights issues Water Rights Dedication 24053 Water rights dedication sufficient to serve the water uses of the proposed development or a cash payment in lieu of a water rights dedication (at Board discretion) must be made by the developer to obtain service. In some cases the water uses related to a proposed development or redevelopment may be covered by a dedication or augmentation plan already in place To determine whether a dedication is required, a proposed dedication is adequate, or a cash-in- lieu payment is acceptable to the Board, the developer submits required information which � r' C� includes: 1) a water demand worksheet, 2) a request for cash-in-lieu payment or information describing the water rights to be conveyed, and 3) $2500 deposit against the review fee. For complex reviews, additional review fees may be required. District/Authority consultants review the submitted information, confirm the proposed water demand and evaluate whether the proposed water rights dedication is sufficient to serve the proposed development, or calculate the cash-in-lieu payment, and make a recommendation to the Board . Staff assembles information for a Board Action Request • Board approves/denies the application for water rights dedication or cash in lieu payment . If approved, staff and consultants will prepare a Water Rights Dedication Agreement between the District/Authority and the developer which will provide the terms of the dedication and the agreement to serve, and conditions under which a refund may be made and an expiration date of the agreement if water rights are not conveyed or payment made per the agreement • The District/Ruthority will ��ot sign off oi� a��y process of the LUA neecled for the deuele�per to ok�tain devel«pment n�;hts (Preliminary Plan �pproval) prior to having water rights issues resalved. Resolution is defined as either: o A determination that no dedication is required; or o An executed Water Rights Dedication Agreement is in place o Board accepts a cash-in-lieu of water rights dedication and developer pays the fee in full. Infrastructure Approval . The developer and District staff meet to discuss the project and Construction Plan Approval review process • The developer provides construction drawings, per the District's requirements. The drawings are reviewed by CRT. If deemed necessary, the CRT may require third party review by the District's system modeling and engineering consultants to determine the effect of the proposed connection and demand on the District's/Authority's existing infrastructure and plant capacity. The developer may be required to up-grade/modify existing infrastructure to accommodate the development and its impact on the system, at the developer's cost . Staff will make a determination of whether the developer must dedicate treated water storage (ie build and dedicate a water storage tank) sufficient to serve the proposed development, or pay a Treated Water Storage fee in lieu of storage dedication � Once the construction plans are approved, including any upgrades/modifications to the existing system, and storage dedication is determined, CRT will provide a Construction Plan Approval Letter. This letter allows the developer to commence construction of the system. A Construction Plan Approval Letter will not be granted until all property to be served by the District/Authority is included and all water rights dedication issues have been resolved . Once the system has been constructed per the construction plans and Construction Acceptance has been granted by the CRT, Customers wanting to tap into the District/Authority systems may submit a New Account Application to receive service . Final Acceptance of the system is granted after a two-year warrantee period and completion of all Final Acceptance requirements. A Final Acceptance Letter is generated . Staff will work with LUAs to ensure that th� dev��loper's S�ibdivision Impraveri�c�r�t f��reernent bond is not released until a Final Acceptance Letter is obtained by the developer 24053 ! u Conditional Capacity to Serve Letter The LUA or a lending entity may request that the developer obtain an Ability to Serve Letter or otherwise commit to serve the development before the conditions to obtain an Ability to Serve Letter can be met. In this case the District/Authority will issue a Conditional Capacity to Serve Letter to the developer that states that the District/Authority is willing to serve the development if all conditions for an Ability to Serve Letter can be met. This letter does not commit the District/Authority to serve the development if the conditions cannot be met. Ability to Serve Letter 24053 The LUA may require the develaper to obtain ari Ability to Serve Letter from the District/Authority as a condition af obtaining developrnent rights for the propased developmer�t. Ability to Serve is not a District/Authority process or requirement for service, however the developer must meet the following conditions before an Ability to Serve Letter will be issued: o The property to be served must be included in the District/Authority o Water rights dedication issues must be resolved o The proposed water and wastewater infrastructure needed to serve the proposed development must obtain District/Authority Construction Plan Approval, which includes an analysis of the impacts the proposed development, water uses and wastewater demands will have on existing or future District/Authority infrastructure, treatment and system capacity, regulatory compliance, rates and water supplies. If the conditions for granting an Ability to Serve Letter are met, staff generates an Ability to Serve Letter, which 1) complies with new state legislation, 2) may contain conditions, and 3) states an expiration period. Staff will work with LUAs to ensure that the Ability to Serve Letter, �s definecl herein, is a candition for the LUA's granting of Preliminary Plan Approval or development rights Staff will work with LUAs to ensure that compliance by the developer with all the conditions and requirements in the Water Rights Dedication Agreement and the Ability to Serve �etter are met as a condition of the LUAs Final Plat Approval and release of the developer's Subdivision lmprovements Agreement bond. Timber Ridge SFE Grandfather Residential Buldings-Exisitng Acct# Building UNITS 651650 A 12 651700 B,C,D 42 651850 E,F,I 36 651950 G,H 12 652100 1 12 652150 K 18 652200 L. 18 652250 M 18 652300 N,P 18 652350 � 12 Total 198 Commercial Buildin 652010 Office Grand Totals SFE'S 12 42 36 12 12 18 18 18 18 12 198 2.6 200.6 Grandfathered 12 42 36 12 12 18 18 18 18 12 198 2.6 200.6 East half-Redevelopment 12 42 36 12 102 102 I 9� v �..►.� �s I�6 ��s �,�<<�� ,�ou�h 1��y zo�o. � � , �td K � ��. b� ��=-p. � �� -� _ ,� � .� . ,� i i:�i� � �c=L� °�'�'1:� _ _.: __ � . ,_ . . _ � _ 2fi4�ct�u!_=��'- --�, . �-rYl t�'►2 K ��i. .r,� . ✓�-i.l . _ -�_�dsc� . h� - ��'�t��= � _ ,� .� _� . �._ _ —...._ - - __ _ _ . _ _ _ -I-I�� , . _ . ___ �_ �-��. _.�. _ . .. _ --� _ _..�_:�--.��..��'.w ��'�1C.R i--�T � ��, � a. �a��. V.... . . ... ..... ._ . . . ... . . . .. . � ._. ....._.___ ..._....._ �.��.�__.__ �"')7�i'�. � __ _ . � . .��c..��._ _� _ ___ _ _ � u�s:�,R_. _ _.__.._ . ____ � _.-_ __ _._ _ _ __ _— � __. .____ r�- �, � - U� "��9y� - - __ _ _ � , __. � • !�u! ✓�.� _. _ __... . _ 2 . v..�hac�� .1��-. ��ld -!-l��s . � ��►rrt��l�i.:� i� To��l ? , �Y)✓a�5 ��= __� ...._.__ ._ .__.� ,._ _: __ ' ; .3 . � �4;, � � ►%�-�.��c.�► � � - �`'�u-,.. .�_.._._ . ` �r�� , �.^r .. iav ��. � � �� o�- � - . __.. _ _ . ___ � , � T; �� ► � _ kh,� �-In� � � �h�r � �� . f . . _._.. .. . � , �:.�.�.�-�2,) y4�„j � �j�4� -�1•4�,.=T'`� _ -�"""_— _... __. � .. . ' �mra� C--��"t�t = Z5Z , �g �C � . ___ _ . , , _.:_. � � - ��.� . o� �� y _ � - .. ��:..�� . �--- _ _ �. � � Y�s �� = .. . r �� .��._w__ . � . ._ � ._ _�.u�_ � _ . _� ___ _ ;.. _ - , _-_-:__�.,�_�___w�.._._..�...--__ _ __ __ __ ,._ .__.__.�....t�._._��___.�.�_._.��_ _ �i I i _ . . _ ....... .,. .. i t ........ ..... .. . . _._..... . .. . ....._ _ ..._ . .. . . .. ...... _.. --� Tow��.l �`COS.�ti-cC f �� -�' _ � _� t�1 � _ � �.� �• 5 ► mh✓a u � � .-FZ� � - � .�,.US �p�,p• l�G•.T-: _ : ..:�.. _ Co��.�l',� u�c--r�� .r - � l . `---� _ _ _� . . �G"c��t�. ..`��=T 5�--' � ►�v.�►l��-. �R ��c. ��v��. 1... _ _ ., - � �1 � � ---�, � C�� __ ' � I ____-___�._-1 O �__��.=-�-- �--= � - - - � t�_� --- - G, �6 Cin�r-��%�---- -___ � � 1 IST /' �,✓.��n --- _w�- -----� ._. _�3C�o ' �� „ �n- � � : -� r. r �..,,a, v �,c��LT1 �.�.r�-.��_ _ _, __ �_�� -� - :�� . _ � L e Z ,. _.. �.-.�-�,..,--�----- � • � ,,,��,,,�� ,,,��JJJ��1��a . ` � , ...��.J...,:_' --._._......,.. ___...._.:...:._.. . . _ ._.._:_.,._ .__,e.,..,...._.._. - -�,�,��..: _ _ , ....: .. _.. _._ _.. � =. R�!-ri tU��? �.��_C...�-R-� _ _��_l%�' �1��►.1.t..= �-, T' �:��'-•- . . . . __ _... . _ _ _. . �.� .�.� �.1.,,_...: (�CC c..c Y�'�.�. � Y-!�i �� Tl � � : _ _ _ - � , -� `Z � l l h��._ �_ --•_ _ ____ __�_—____ I ' � �S �'R��-iGr� ' ��LC _ . T�.w__W'_`�:.k�- • — ► � . .:.ob.t.__.�.4 _� �- _ , ..�_,��_� _ ._ _ _ .. _ __.Y�,_ .- ,: _ _� __,__, _ _._ : , .. _ ti �..s.1___L�,��r.�s.,.�%��► � �..., -- . . , .�o �.t�, •.. _ �.G_� '�.�_ __., ._ __ -�u �__ _ _ � � � _ i i ___ .��R.�.�� -1�= �b�.,�ll�._'`• _ Vv►�s� . . �_u . � _ � � Luo 5 i-w � � -:� �..�,t��21�5 • .., -- � ��T�,��Sh; u ,/�_ `�S�c,�� -r�..l�✓�zn_ . :_� �. _.� _ _ `� �.. .�, �ar � � r�'-E�s __ �'�a ►�r> �-I�, � - �- �sr �F' .,..___ �� ,�'_' �4r, " " ` ' U�-.J�Rc��-.�� _ _�.n�--__ , __. —� _ _.._W:.__ r...,._.�..�... _ _ . _ _. _� _ n _. - __T. _.. • • — • �'C�01�'1 c:�`uc1 C�o�..��1Gi . _ __ �� I,�c__ _. �i��:�.�n��.., .__ _ _ �d� `� �, r. , ; __ � � �_ __ _ _ _ �"�— . _ _ . . _ _ _ __ � ��r►� � _ :, i �L� -1� I � �.� __. _�. - ... i � 1 V'ii7 1/� TLLL « THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on February 8, 2010, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a final review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, to allow for the �redevelopment of an approximate five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village � Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 �a North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) �/� Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC �1 Planner: George Ruther A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, to allow for the construction of retaining walls in excess of six (6') feet in height, located at 1280 �.�'"' North Frontage Road/Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1,and setting forth �� details in regard thereto (PEC100001) �8 Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC • J Planner: George Ruther �' The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The publicin thelTowtn of Va�Community Developmetnt Departmenthat precede the public hearing Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published January 22, 2010, in the Vail Daily. C� � � _ . � . � �.: � __ . .s�.._ �, . ��r �� 4 '�' � � � ��m �� i d � _- � .:� .: � ��, °;� ' Department, of Community Developmenf; '' ��, - ;.� 75 South Frontage Road ; �� , � �. ,� Vail, �Co�orac�o,� �1��57'�`� ;�� "; � �, � � a,: � ,, "��,� ��@� 97Q-47� 2'��',' � �` �r' � � 'F��C�97(l 479�24��.' rv� �' ., 3�' P�� 3 . � � .� �� IVeb}" WWW �ta��i`IY��CS(11 ; � � f1......1.�'�i�imnnf FadatlPW'�f7ii�'i#fii�lOi�.^;: . �� t.�cr.c.� f.%a, . ,.,,..,, .�...,...a, . � �;� ��,��a,.,��„�,�`� �' Major Subdivision Review Appiication for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commissi � �v�u1�i � JAN 2 F 2�10 � TOWN OF VAIL General Information: This application is for a request to subdivide more than four (4) lots, or a su ivisio i'prvTmstr4- without all lots having frontage on a public, approved street, or with a request to extend Municipal facilities in a signifi- cant manner, or a proposal which would negatively affect the natural environment as determined under Section 12-12-2 of the Town Code or if the proposal would adversely affect the development of the remainder of the parcel or the adja- cent property. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall conduct a public hearing on an application for Major Subdivision and give recommendation to the Town Council on said Subdivision. Please see Section 13-3, Major Subdivi- sions, Vail Town Code for more detailed information. Vail Town Code can be found on the Town's website at www.vailgov.com. The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Review Board and/or Town Council. Fee: $1500 + $20 per plated lot Description of the Request: � —�, �J� ��-- i . �.�.- ��/l � �-- Physical Address: a �'� � Parcel Number: c� I �� 1�� b 0� (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property owner: � f � Mailing Address: "�J S � � Phone: � �'i7 � � �" `� Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: '�-�:•� Mailing Address: �0�11� � �% ��"� � .� t � �.., .�ru...� � Phone: � iO ' � � � � � � ,�� - . E-Mail: Fax: For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: _�_1Q�i ___ Received From: Meeting Date: �� PEC No.: C �� Planner: l� � Project No: � � � � Zoning: �C��-� � Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot:_� Block:___�f___ Subdivision: ��i (��/lSl' l � pE�� a�� O 1-Jan-10 i i TOWN OF VAI� ` Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 970-479-2158 Fax: 970-479-2166 www. vailgov. com MEMO To: George Ruther From: Public Works Re: Conceptual Review of Timber Ridge Redevelopment Date: 1 /27/ 10 The Town of Vail Public Works Department received the PEC Timber Ridge Redevelopment plan received 1/15/09. Based on our review of these preliminary plans the following are our comments. Additional comments will be provided when more detailed plans are provided. Comments• 1. The Town of Vail General Notes shall be updated to reflect the most current notes. There are a few missing from this set shown on the Title Sheet. 2. Please provide a stamped survey of the site within the Building Permit set. Additional spot elevations will be needed in the office surrounding area and buildings J and K in the areas that may be affected. 3. Show the newly installed sidewalk at the west end of the project as existing, not proposed, this should be included in the existing survey conditions. 4. Transit Area; a. Show all bus turning movements confirming 4 buses work independently and 6 buses can be stacked end to end. b. Show Bus entry turning movements, does the main entrance curb return have to be so large. c. Show shelters for both WB and EB directions d. Bike path should be separate from transit walk to minimize conflicts. e. Show grading/walls (as necessary) on the west end of the transit loop and up to the "new parking" area west of the office. £ Show a connection along the north side of the transit loop (w/ stairs as needed) to a crosswalk across the drive entrance to just south of the club entrance. 5. West entrance area/parking; a. Show crosswalks across drive entrance �� b. Extend a walk north from Fire lane/ped path along the east N-S curb line of the � entrance. This walk should lead to the crosswalk/parking/stairwell to club entrance level. c. Where does the inlet at the SE corner of the Office connect to. d. There should be a stair access to the parking at the entrance to the club. e. The minimum clearance between the wall and the club columns should be at least 5', and even that is tight for this public space. f. The drive lane should be shifted south after the curve as it enters the east existing housing to eliminate the loss of parking on the north side. g. The "new parking" area should be maximized at this time. Looks like we may be able to add 2-3 more spaces. h. The 8 spaces and trash area seems to be a very expensive excavation with 18'-36' walls. Can the spaces be eliminated/moved elsewhere and the trash moved well forward as well to save the cost of all the retaining and leave this area alone? The construction shoring of these walls are sure to impact the eastern project, so how will these walks be built. i. The Town will need to understand how this redeveloped access point will/may effect development potential of the western portion of the site. 6. Fire Lane/Ped Path Areas; a. The Fire lane/ped path connection to the entrance drive should feel pedestrianized. Do not provide curb returns. Provide a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp. And discuss with fire if this can be necked down to 10'-12' for a very short section b. I would envision both access points on the E and W side to be exit onlys for emergency vehicles and that EV access the lane by the main garage access point. � Show Fire truck turning movements. c. Seems like the lane on the west half could be sloped to toward the road easily and sheet flow across the grass slope down to the Frontage Rd curb. The east side could also be raised more quickly from the west entrance at a�4% slope to help eliminate grade difference between the lane and the buildings. d. The very west end should have an ADA connection to the Fire Lane/Ped Path to provide access to the Lane and across to the Transit area. e. The east half of the lane could also sheet flow to the south and into the proposed storm sewer between the S. Frontage Rd and the Lane. £ The east half could also be brought up quicker to match building FF elevations rather than have stairs. g. The east connection to the Frontage Road cannot occur as drawn, this will be easily considered as an access point. The connection should be made with the existing bike path and with a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp. Keeping it 10' 12' for a short section will also be helpful. h. The Frontage Rd. curb should be wrapped around into the Savoy Villas entrance tio the new Lane/path connection. 7. All of the retaining walls in the back of the project do not meet Town Code and will require a variance or to be benched at a 6'V to 4'H ratio. 8. Engineered analysis on the existing condition of the gabion walls to remain will be required, details on how to connect to existing gabion walls and how to build walls beneath the existing gabion walls will be required, as well as construction shoring plans showing no impact to the adjacent properties. 9. The walls at the back of the building should be designed with larger benches to provide room for larger landscape/trees. �. 10. Frontage Road; a. A CDOT access permit approval will be required prior to approval. b. Full CDOT frontage Rd design plans will be required as a part of this project c. A full width overlay will be required as a part of this project for the limits of the Frontage Rd improvements. d. Tapers and Decel lengths shall match Traffic study recommendations, 190' left turn lane with 10:1 taper and 20:1 lane shift tapers. e. Can any widening be done to the south, maybe part or all of the south shoulder? 11. Accommodations for a bus stop on LRL should be made the grade meets the road with fill against the parking structure. This could alleviate some congestion at the Transit area and function for the eastern half of the building. 12. Drainage; a. Provide a Drainage Report b. The Town does not require detention for developed sites, unless there is a significant increase in water run-off and existing storm sewer cannot handle the anticipated flow, in which case the existing system should be upsized or detention can be considered. c. We do require all surface and structured parking drainage to run thru Water Quality (which is shown) d. Identify which storm sewers take public water run-off and provide adequate easements thru the site. e. Does the 18" pipe on the NE corner of the parking structure flow over a 10+' retaining wall? This will need to be piped. f. In the same area as above an existing storm sewer crosses Lions Ridge Loop, where is that water proposed to go. g. Provide storm sewer profiles. 13. Utilities; a. Utility sign offs will be required on the title sheet. b. The option to minimize the utility easement to 30' is shown, is this going to be considered? The current plan does not seem to need that additional room. This idea was brought up to help the building move forward (south) 10' to help the retaining wall grading issue in the back and/or for additional landscaping in the back. c. The idea of `meandering' the fire lane/ped path is great, however locating significant landscaping (trees) will not be allowed over utilities. If it is determined to `meander' the lane, show how the utilities will be protected. d. The depth of the existing water line is needed. e. All necessary additional easements for utilities will be required. f. How will existing services be maintained thru construction g. Show the existing sewer/water services to the buildings to remain. Will any utility services be required to be relocated? 14. Please provide a Landscape plan. Sight distance and Utility conflicts will be a key issue. And any landscape in CDOT ROW will require a CDOT landscape permit. 15. Show lighting plan. How will the project, transit area, Frontage Rd, Fire Lane/ped path be lit. 16. Building; a. The Environmental report indicates that the population of this new development will be �552-570 individuals housed in 352 units as compared to �424 in 106 individuals housed in 106 units today. The existing calculation is based on 106 2 bedroom units with 4 persons per unit. What is the developed population based on? The current 352 unit count contains 544 bedrooms, at 2 persons per bedroom, the resulting population would be 1088 individuals. Please clarify the � proposed population and please clarify whether there are 102 vs 106 units being removed. b. The circulation for the storage/trash/mail room seems to be inadequate. At a minimum short term parking spaces need to be assigned in this area. The Traffic study indicates approximately 30 vehicles will be entering and 50 vehicles will be exiting during a peak hour. Some percentage of those trips will want to stop in this area, and need accommodations to do so. Moving the access west may help with circulation. This may be done by swapping unit location. c. The trash circulation and locations seem inadequate for this large of a development. Having only one point to dump trash and only accessible from inside the parking structure is inadequate. Having a trash chute on both sides of the parking structure (E&W) and accessible from inside the building along with one on the very far west and east side of the building seems more accessible. d. The trash chute should also be coupled with a recycle area/chute. e. How will the Bike storage areas be secure/controlled/accessed? How many bikes will it hold? f. Is the storage area secured by a gate/door? g. An emergency/service access from the top deck would be very functional far service and an emergency/secondary access to this large of a structure. h. Show typical dimensions for parking spaces/drive lanes etc... These will have to meet Town code. All exposed surface spaces are 9x19 and garaged/covered are 9x18. Cross-over aisles are supposed to be 30'. i. Show elevations for parking garage. j. There are walks shown at the entrance at the parking garage, are these raised or at grade. k. Show drainage for the parking structure. Where will it tie into the sanitary sewer(this will require ERWSD approval) l. Show Snow storage calculations. Where will the top deck snow storage go? m. Where do the roof drains daylight or connect to the storm sewer? n. Generic grading is provided in the courtyards. Provide specific design, hardscape, ped paths, landscape etc... o. How does Unit 2A function, is the bedroom surrounded by four walls, is there no typical door entry to the bedroom, the closet looks very narrow will hangers fit in it, the kitchen island seems oddly placed and in the way of living space. p. Does the dumpster meet Town Animal proof enclosure requirements. Shouldn't its footer be below frost line. q. Some of the units on the ground floor are only accessible from the outside not the garage without going up one floor to then go down. Should there be an interior corridor to access these units and also the Elevator tower. r. The upper levels do not match with the garage floor plate so there is ramping and stairs to each level. The direct route, the stairs seems narrow for a main entry way, can this be widened. s. Multiple garage levels show stairwell exits that go no where, what is the intent? t. The 4`" and 5`h floar garage level plans show a different entrance into the buildings on the east side, why is there a difference. And the 5`h floor does not show an access door for the east side of the garage to the building. u. The plans reference Garage Plans by others, when will they be provided. 17. Easements shall be provided for Drainage, the Fire/Ped Path, Access to the west existing property, Transit area. 18. Who is responsible for plowing the fire lane? 19. Traffic Study; a. The Traffic study will need to be updated, once the final program in the development is determined. b. Note on the Traffic generation summary that the 171 units is based on occupancy not capacity. c. The traffic engineer should comment on the circulation issue as stated above regarding the mailroom/storage/trash area. 20. Transit projections; a. A more specific Town bus impact analysis should be made. As indicated in the Traffic study the Town's bus headways will probably not change as much as suggested, although shadow buses will increase and this will impact number of buses, operations, maintenance of buses. This will also provide a bigger incentive to construct Simba Run underpass and the need for a line haul route at faster headways at peak times. b. The project removes 106 units roughly equivalent to a maximum of 424 people. The new development provides 352 units roughly equivalent to 1088 people(This assumes 2 per bedroom). The increase of people on this site is �260%. The existing peak ped. counts using transit (based on counts on 12/30/09) was 112, which was based on �86% occupancy rate. So at full occupancy this could have been 130 people. An increase of 260% would then result in a transit ped need of 338 at full occupancy, 2 per bedroom. If the LRL bus stop was installed and 10% of the transit use went there, then the Frontage Rd. Transit Area would need to carry 305 people in an hour. The existing bus at peak times currently arrives 2/3rds full with a total capacity of about 50. A shadow bus typically follows this bus once it arrives at Timber Ridge to allow for an additional capacity of 50. Additional analysis will be required to understand the true impact to the Town bus system, regarding operations, maintenance, new buses, new positions, etc... c. This additional need would have to be covered by the Red and Green routes today, but could be supplemented by a new Line Haul route in the future if the Simba Run underpass were built. d. In addition, there is currently a safety hazard with pedestrians crossing the interstate at this location in order to short cut travel to the Cascade employment center/lift access. This is likely to increase due to almost 3x the pedestrian population as there is now. A Simba Run underpass would help alleviate this concern, although probably not eliminate the problem. To eliminate the problem adequate pedestrian barriers would need to be installed to divert all people away from crossing the interstate. 21. Hazard Study; a. The hazard study needs to provide language compatible with the Town Code. Basically stating that mitigation of the High severity Rockfall was required. b. Figures 1-13 were not included in the pdf report we received. c. A rockfall mitigation plan will be required based on the study and Town Code. d. Assuming a rockfall mitigation fence is provided on site, a larger bench south of LRL will be required to install the fence and provide landscape screening. 22. The development will require a pubic art component. Town of Vail Public Works General Conditions of Approval 1. Please add the Town of Vail General Notes to construction plans. (Notes can be e-mailed upon request) 2. Please add Utility Signature block and have all utilities sign acknowledging acceptance of utility design. 3. All construction staging issues shall be resolved prior to construction including staging, construction parking plan, phasing, access, schedules, traffic control, emergency access, etc... 4. A ROW/Utility permit shall be obtained and approved by the Town of Vail prior to commencing any construction within public Right of Way. 5. A Town of Vail Revocable ROW permit shall be recorded for all private property improvements located within public ways. 6. A CDOT access permit shall be approved prior to Civil Plan and Building Permit submittal, and a CDOT Notice to Proceed set of plans shall be approved prior to approval of Building Permit. 7. Prior to approval of a Building permit all necessary permanent and temporary easements are recorded with Eagle County. 8. Prior to approval of a Building permit a shoring and excavation plan shall be submitted including; excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans with plan, profile and cross sections. Cross Sections and plans shall include all existing conflicts (i.e. utilities). 9. Any excavation shoring methods used that encroach upon adjacent public or private property shall have approval by the appropriate owner and have a recorded easement prior to construction. This includes CDOT and the Town of Vail Right of Ways. 10. A CDPHE Permit and all applicable ACOE permits (i.e. Dewatering) shall be submitted prior to construction. 11. If temporary and/or permanent dewatering is anticipated during construction, a dewatering soils analysis will be required by a qualified licensed engineer analyzing the impact to adjacent properties(i.e. settlement) 12. Provide full civil construction drawings meeting Town of Vail standards prior to building permit submittal. � L. � � � ��V�� KEV MAP � . .. . .. .. .. Esmw V Niaw •. n � � � .. ..... ....... Z � � 5. . ._ ........ � _ _ �a�L 1 MN} � � _ ..�.,�� .: . .._... ._ .. %. . � ... .. ?�J. — ..�n , �,o.. ..,. �. , «a _ - �� LION'S RIDGE - � . _ ... � °s� .o�.n �rc m�m..� ... .. � . .. __"' - � .. � r.. . . . .... 100P (PUBLIC � � .. __.. �uZ �� a,,.,� „�., �, , JI�� e�mw . ---- '° � .._'"" - -'-.-,... _ _ _-_ ._. , R 0 W.) CO3.5 N^� � .o. �.� . ._. _. _ , _ _ __ � . ._ - _. .. .. � �. • _ _ ; - _�_ .__ ��Z - .�� :,o.� � - _ --,._ ..... 0 0 .� sm� murn.E j - -_._ _ _ - - _ o � �� ..� 'j -`=-- - - ----- a � _. _ : ;_ � _ _ _ �: . � _ _, _ ` _. _. � ,�,� � � . ..� _N ,>- .. ..: _ _ __ a ��w € � �.,� �.� � , .t..�� l �.� � �.�..� „_ �. :a..�"'�. .�w...� _ „ _ _ _.: �1 ��M rwa� wW rvr . . � ! . Fjia .. �..�.� ._.. �> ��M... . . . . . .... . �[�-OW '�"�� V' ♦ rwsa.in w �mi a' . �, b ^ :� .. � . . !f 'Ylny-0 � �� iwm� P�oE w 1� . � .. . � � .. t� �armi a VGm w1t .. j � . �a " � iw �v>w. � .... ,z .�.� . � � � �uu �� . � a.,.w,F,�.�.K a� .. : ,u�,,, _.._ - - ��,,.� �m '�,_«m�---- _ � E...In a��, ---__ a� �...�� '"°�'°'a � i q __ -.- - -- Q�, __ -m'F'# � s�i Z ; ��..��K , _.. • � _. �.-.�., � O Q ��i � , � "° aM ...�.. ...e,.. < T,.. 3 . i ..,_��...r� � ,�...�.,. �... «. o.�.. ,�._ _. . . �.�� , � . . J r..nxu r�� ( o a , .�; Q '.�w � .:�_:�,�.y _ ,,, - ,_ ' W � .�.� �.,� �.�._ ;.�.. °�°°�� , _ � , � , o� ..�...� �...�.�w.. _... � � � y N urn. GViw� wc .. 6. n.� wr.r...i m.r. w�..r ��.. ww. . . rm� wxm� / . .. �..d u. wer.. w u. � .,.�..... M .k� .. � � �..., .. O 8110 M, � m« �. m....�.,.. �.«,..... ,,.�....�. , �... , a -�— r , �; ` J � Q �, � . lu �a w��Y w ae� ryi rw p . � � � . . . �J � nwl�l �s r �. ' � . . � � � � O L minns :� �Y• . �v.V uanv w�n , y . +�w w+�e� r saae� we = . , _,. _. �� .� .ie� i.��•.u� wi . 6 ��. . �� .. . . . . _ _' � � ..�` � . � y , � n M AMf �e � �o..n��.wu s�rul w . . � ... .._. MN � � . � M . . � � �..�.: " ...�. � w 1� V r�w � ..�°:��.��....�.... E -�:� �r � �� a,�.. �..� . � ��,....... - - � �r.ao .o ,a c^ e::.�,. �ti .. _. ti .. ...�. - — � � � � � � � � � p A� . � e, �, , - (PARCEL A) � �+aun� � a '° / �''Oa '`� a=�} I � Z . . . ..._ ` : ❑ �� 8099 �nm �°S� � �.et �' .Tg I '�. Z � � � y � _�� ' _ _ mp°Q �,:� -�� ,.�. � �' �� 8094� � � _ .< , ` ___ _ .° � 5 ( ... . OFFICE �� t � .. w� �- � '�� f. � �yJ C� _ ' ,Y I �� — �' , � �=e 928' ' � J Z m.� y � . � � � ` �, '' ' ... ... �. , � � 8096 � Q Q . .. I _ . ,,.., .. . , . .._._� r=== - '° � -,. � > � ; .� � . >. """ � � i_.� . ..`. � aussro� �� ,I � � � . �J f ;}a. �« �; ;� .. - i �n�� .. W� .r� " . � ' - ._ . . r a . x � . .. �uk � _ .. : , i� c � � � ,»i� €F> _. , , _� - " _ �� 1y� , �� ,� . _ ' � � � .. _ . ,� -� . � h .. ,� ^. p . %, . Ay_ re� .. 4{.. �m��rx , - � . .. �. � I �.��u e � h( aw f�w�a , � ' � . pwK nott� � ... , �1� P t 4 �%.. I :�. ., �. .. _ . ., : . .. . -..ao� n �� `� __ . .. _ . ' ' y " ,� . f ". - .� .: ll�i '°° _�- - —` ?' �— . .,« . . . � . an ' v. �.00 � � � - , . . " i . � � �� .. 1 ' -. — - ... '. . .... ' ., "_ . ussioP . ... . .-, . .. .. - i s � w � ... , . � � . , __' _-�--__ . .. � a. ' _ .atu. _ ' .�_ ' .k�.. ' __ _ �.-c- ,....... ,. � R ��q .. . _ _ -. _ _ " `t�� y. � M _ " _ ,,,� _ n , 'ril . — . lM . p .._ ,.. . . __ � � � .. .. . .. . . . . . ... .. .. . .. . . .. - _ ' . _y ..'� �,�- —yr ; ., �. 3'. " - N � r . .; .: �.,. ...� ... .. Nv. Wi. WNn' F � � . ... . "r.�.. . . . .. -ai ..e . ,.....,.. -. _.. . _ . _ . _ �. _�� s ` ., . . .. _.,. ... i^ . ... ... _ . -...,n--A*�_ .�� e:. . 1 ... . .. . ... . W � 5 u u^"'�' »t . . ... � . � .-Miv .. . . - . �.+ mu v°h �"' pR a „ss ;.� .�a cr� M]p4N.�0. m/+lo ,� _ . .' _ . 1 a .... ��.: � .,. _... , . y � : .,. � . .. � . ... . �r�m�Cr T.E� M'°10�0 rl .. �' .. . .. . .. ... _ _ _ ` w WW � - . ...... ._.. N - �-. � 3. ;,, ' - _ _. _. . _ _ . _ _. _.._ " .. � .. . . ; �... . .. .., _. ' �. _ � � n' . �, . .. _ . , _._._ _..,... {_ _ . . o 0 o •:n;.. __. _. .�., _ _ ,.. : , _,.., ' .,, ..., ,..` .: -. .. .. . _ -- . _' . ; s� '' - �. w � - , .. - - — - — - -- - — - -- 'Y INTERSTATE HIGHWAY No. 70 (R O.W.) — � _. . .. : •, -- - � — - -- - �-- - -- - -- - � . 1 (NOR1H FRONTAGE ROAD WEST - PUBLIC R.0 WJ........... _.. _ . CO3.5 r�i —,— _ _'_ _- --- z., - . ..,� _ _ _ _ � _. o _ � _, z 8 U � v� .:.,R . � ... . ...i . . ... _. ... . . .. .. .... _.. F � ... ..._... . - ... .. ... ., W . .... . . ...... ^ � .. �.. . . . . ... _... .. ~ ° :,:,. .. .. _... .. . „� .. .. .. . .. .. � Qu � "�u o _ ^i o �' ��'' lRf lU1N al06 R{ e h � U " � � N � • SHEET � ` PRELIMINARY GRAPH15CA1E � CO3.2 � � FOR Af�NCY RENEW ONLY - NOT FOR PPopNG � � � a - .. m,,.� r �m. ., a,�.� ,p �,�.� Z - -., ,.� _ ��,. _ � �, . I i f _w .; �.; .; �4 . . . _ — _ W�dpZ . � ,� � � � _ _ �.�_� ; . � ., ,,�� . � �_ - �� _a ��ry �� .� > m,�� Q�I�II� � a ` I z _ ` , � �� a , ; _ — o � „� M,..,�.� �p� _ Co3.s � " � �� _ ` ;. _.. _ ,. _ __- _"- �- '"��w A � �� _ _ �� 0 «� �� UON'S RIDGE LOOP PUBLIC R.O.W,) . - �.� �'�� ^�T� _ _ --� ' . :.._ .... , iwuc _ _ � � ... . _ _ ._,_,- - - ---_ _. � . .... _.ana .... _ .. . - _ _ ^ . . ��r� _ _ , « - . _ - _ _ _ _,_...._ _ __ _.._ _ _ - ----' ' � _. � � �'� � .�a.orv w�nc a� aac �: .--- AE..� _ , '°�b� � °�"`�. �%' � ,� � � �.'� �,.W� ° � =\ � � ,- � �.:,m° ,.,� �_ ,�.. � _ _ ..«6' �»--`� 3 I '� _ , .�� s � .� ° �.�°'� - � � „� �.. . �_��., -. _ � ,� � - ,� ,�a.,� . � � . . . . ".1ni__�— �1r�• „_._..- .m . a,� , . _ �_ - na. '� � - � m,�.�.,..� .. � nJ nV..� nY �. � , .. .. ; osmC fi3Maw �fR/t 1 { �J -� • T . . �� .. � 11� E1�5 r '. N31Na 6FCiw[ vM4T ` a { ' atrta SMfT YMMaE �( . . � i etf w � y � � . � � _ � _ � i: � '-.! mSRW nm� wLK Q �� . � � :.-e,° � p � � "°'R _..... v ,.._. J I - � . __ . . � . �.. .. _ _.. .. . .. - � s : °.w."'� �:�"� .�..,� �...� ... o....e. 0 � � . � � �� ; n.�.�� W Q : �.� �.�..�._�.� � �w _ � ;- .�:...� � �. ��.�:, �.-�.. � ° Q I � > �..�...w .,.� �m...,.... �., «. -J J ... i l e!Y s� n� M�v m�e w eetlw a tln .c� w1 �n Mtb. w Mt� s awala, a Q _ O� M' tie b N�MYa MAr ww sxwM ��Y �` OO �� 9 I� M we. � 6 ' >. n .a. �� .tl.t ��n m� H ' i `. .... - � " � . . ■a raYSl� M �Y W�M�v� � � —�( . .: . ....e.,y .el --,.' .. . . � 'i4 1 ��v�wa�wMwx N .. . w w.p� /r �l ? a. ,� �, 1 � LL I � ��., � � : • :."", �. ..«a. �.,.. ..�'..'. �"',.... L� . ...�..w,.a,......,..... }0 I �a �� v n � .,.°'�.,.. ,�..� ....p. e,�w. � 0 F- u,�,vo�� ♦ , � � d. � ,o �:'.,:.:,.. �e � M.� n ._ ....,,..,....d Z 899926' . ... . 'V `� ... .. _. ��,:. ok..�� u� Z � I . ,. .. . � . , °1 '�;•.. . � i � m � � �__.— ,m, � r� � � O Z � . E, � , , ; �2s� � Y ,..�, mOUQ -- � ; �� .m. ,• + I � . .$-8�9928' � � �g � �o�n�, �e � �� ~ J Z �e ' ,� n: .; lL m, +— � � , �� —' � o � F^�` � � ' � CONDOM NIUMS � .. a 1 , . m. �. 'i'°' -,' ..0 _, .� � .� � - , _ ..��" w � „ _ � , „o,,,� ��,� �,,;�,� �,,,, , �.,,�,a � ,- ��,.: � - � .,e.� � : .:= r . � � � �� _,a,< � q � . � � , °'�. �, � � ,� .. ,� .. �. � r, �. � .: �, . ��;, . � � � � ; �� _ _ _ � _ � � � � a� _ z. s.� � _ � _ � � — �'i�,� — �s�.K. ,.� -- -�— , � � F , _ _ � _ ��.� . � y ?�. �. ` _:��-_ � _ :i° .. ,.�.,— -... --'� C "f_ :. . ..4'EF .... . _ .. . � � , .�i� "'.u'"°° .�. _. . �a .. -. �__ _- -- - _ . .. °n"" "'x�. . � . ... . ,_.___ . - _�—_ �rc.. �, �.,. �-.�.b.-r. �.�. ,r. . �. �� s . TMm � � n � �s u�� *r5�. �. � � � ' sa.�.�YOww � roa� _ ;K.4 = �«,�._ .... _ , n' . ."° ;.:4 �.. . ... . ,_ _ . � iw.a°°}n° a. � i . �t � ,. � cw9r....o..a+�rwo � -� � � - " ... .. .mcrawn � � . <wsb _ ' . ' _ , .� . � _- ._ _ . mm* e.p � e, . 1 � � �. ....... ___..._ � � n.n _:`°' : -.. . �� .... ._. _..___ ....._. :- � ,� .- ___, - .'.- �� ."«."_"�r '+ � �� _ ._... ,l . . _ _ e " � .,.. a. _ Q v..< �w.� � W r _ _ -- _ � __ - - ___ _ � _ _ . . _ _ � 1 _ - J- , � . � . _ - _ =.��- -- - INTERSTATE HIGHWAY No 70 �(R 0 W . �. €' . � - -�- ' -- �- "� ° (NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD N'EST - PUBUC R O.W ) _ . ... _ _ __- _ --- � . c _ . .. < .__..__. _._.. ri Z __.. .'__ .. . .......... .. . ... c _ z ' _•__ _. ~... - ..-�. � . UI ' � ...... _ „..._-. ....._..._ ._ _... ...., h . � _ yV YII�lO� �IfG1 r�L i1�l��_+�i[f,l PRELIMINARY FOR AGENCY RENEW ONLY - NOT FOR PRIqNG $ 8 9� 8 m _ 3 € � SHEET CO3.3 � C�� VAILTIM 6ER�.RIDGE MARCH 16, 2010 U PDATE AN D DISCUSSION Of � , �� ,��._ � CF Jordan & Place Properties Date: March 16, 2009 8:OOAM to 10:OOAM �� 2 � ■ 2ND-5TH FLOOR PLAN a+oPeRnuNe srnw STOMGE r' / �� ,� � , �I /, ...�. A �, /, +5� � ti �pP E� �\QG 9 � / �.��N �4�F Ni ��/ 1 / .�` l��H /� � i v - (�-\� � .� E+OG .� f 0 ' s �' �., � �� - ORFGF � � / . �� ,/�� % ii� � '< �`',� ,�ii '� �i � � �� ' /' ,� , i �, /' ,� �, ��, � � ^ C7 t , � � ` � "� . <�.r► �ltia� ]ii� �\� s� 'aTOPAGE � �CPEPttuIIE � ��. �� 1' y� i �, ♦ i' / � ' j , /" , PpOPEfRYLWE ��_._..... FJSFMENT C�� t��yyE ''' O ,, IOTRREA:SACRES ' �� : . TOTAL UNITS:J72 y�1�� pEN51TY.74.8UNITSPERACRE y �P.. BUILOINGHEIGMT:SSTORY e' CLUBHOIISE�.5000 $F. � � � �� / ��'Z'��`� . ' PRRKING REOUWEQ 2 SPACES FOF LBEDROOM e 5ND10 �✓� j � �9�P 4SSPACESFOR2�BEDROOM /� \�'CF' .. I�GOMPACTCMAILONE01 / PRRKING PROVI�EO'. 340 SFACES � ( INCLVOING fia COMPPCTSPACES E HANDICAP SPACES ) .'�,, � I 0865PACE5 PER UNIT � ,` .. , , ,-�- ��ULnTqNe: EJ�UX tBUILONO86�b 7yP,PFRqNG$TALL:M%70' CANPACT PAR1cIN6 STKLL 16' %8' ecA'on. �pSCAPE ISLANO RE�UIRE�: 6' PER EVERY 15 PPRKING SPACES . o � i% �. ; � q2 , 6 "`+ SNOWSTORRGE'2.5%OFSACRE=56CSSF.REOUIRE� �� a' - —� � - - — - az e;� ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN E�uoMt.iEWn�,FO�to<«� N sca�E�. � ,ao-a� ,... �� , ..�.�oH..,.or�,��r ' c w eo �eo PROFORMA PLAN 3 � � �� ° d M � ��` ^I Wi V M � � �� dµp.�., � r � ;G M�'rs �� . ,.„ i,hr� ii � , � �N " � i, �� ' � d "" �.i �� w u� , �,� � + �� 9��; �, al �r ; �, � a i n-V � �.��...,� �.Sr o'r+7. -•_ �'�.�.a — � AITFP,NATE PLAPJ �,, , � .� � �;` � i �. :. `.. z r� � .� .��4 � ��m�. �, a,, � �, �' � .,�, �,�� {°r�st : { S ��7'� `� .� � � ��' � �� 1� �� /•'� �� . .. , � ,�.. �:a �,: _ ��: . ,�..a,.,� . - � ' u, �, ,,�` ��x> z enrxa ii.;_ �,Qr � . s �cxrn`+ . . <"C t4 � 3 F @ ' 1 �.Ii�.si�Mw[aVf �3 1 ,.,, � w� � u ( ... n_.�.�ar._..s4.._a.w_�w�.0 �... — I ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ,. ,, . �, —, V71I Th1108f ft'qgE, LLL QI�01i(�La60n5 & Prt7po5al SuCmtle6 Jin �, 2�7a9 aage 5a � ■ Desi n Conti n ued g .�,��.�. �, ,� �� . .4r'� �,:....�... . , r� 5 , � � � • Meetin s ched u e � • 7 Town Council meetings from selection date to re-develo ment agreement date (May-October) p p • 1'oint DRB, PEC, Town Council meeting (Oct. 27) J • 1 Community Open House (Dec. 30) �� 1 Vail Economic Advisory Council (Jan. 12) 3 PEC hearings • 2 DRB meetings • Final PEC March 22 • Final DRB April 7 presentation 0 . ` 7 � � ' ' m lishments Fi na nci n acco � p � � Co m p l ete d A LTA S u rvey • Com leted Noise Assessment Study p • Com leted Phase 1 Environmental & Asbestos p • Com leted A praisal Rent and Expense Study p p • Completed Market Study • Submitted application to HUD on January 25, 2010 ` � � � Current Desi n � FRONT ELEVATION 352 apartments with 544 bedrooms (loss of 20 units from original design) 7,900 sq. ft. clubhouse 524 structured parking spaces On site storage lockers — bicycle parking Courtyard amenities — outdoor spa, fire ring, barbecue grills, patio areas Gas water heater in each apartment Washing machine and dryer in each apartment Fire lane/bike path on site Upgrades to exterior materials and landscaping from original plan _ � :.� .a, � ,_��1 / �� .� �. �• . �� . � � �� , �i�� 1� _,�� C� 0 i e Pla n St � � .� ;� �p�� .. � ��.�- � � -�q��r; �M;� �, � l.IIA1 �' �'�-`� ''' � ' ,�' - � � p,,_� r e�� c��,�,� d � � . , .. , : . . . ,.. , .. . : . . ,__ .. _ -- a � - - . �� : ,,. . .. ' � ..,�ir�:. � � - _ . : _ , _ _ � . .: � � _ -- — — . ' o- , � _ , �_._. . _ � �� a. , ,�. �: � -----' _ _ �--- � I .� - ,��i=� ��-� ��:' �� .� I �� * a �i.A��'+�riJ �, _ �: ��v,�� '_�';. � �� `��d �'�� r, -C-��'�c'mt1 ., ..� o� . . �° . �� - � • ; ...`,�,j��1 '• a \ - , —��.°!!"''1� ��, �,+�* �m/ `� � �— � --- 'i F•` ; / � ` . � t, � ''� r � � � . _-- -- - e , � _ �. ,� �� i ; � �� I� -- T��sA��. r�y ,� �� '�` ��i �6:� �■ �� :i•• jh.11i9 � ` �' ��,�,`J� �r'�% i�J � t ( ' � �a;3 y�'�,'�� ,��' %�:' �" � ��. a i �i �?� �' � i � n> I I�' -- -t" t�F�,y � `��I �� -- — Y , ��' sx - - � sa":;#�� . �,a� ; ��a ��: . , - :. ti+ � :: :, � � ' a' �'�ii� i I :,.. � � � � :,... ,� • � « :1 � i "; �� , i �! �A!�.s+ �I q�� . ,� ' �P� ` 'i,�' ��`�' � I i � �� — . ��, � �y�i �� • =a - � �' �y �� ,.,,j �:�r� � � � •1ap��„��k { � � . R��r�'�%r� � �..n'�� r�il� �e7��, � ��oY.�E - >i--+r��3��, . _t .._ .. I �_��w,*11�i fFh �:.� ��d�l"�� :t �j� �� "� �.�'� .,� . - �� . � �� I�ti- 'Y�- r�.��a ��e�� - � _ _ : ^._ �, �'"" .!_ __. ---- -- -1 _. . ° - _. _. .. ._.. ..-- � ° .;° — _ z±oo. _._ �_ � ,_ �+so ^— — — � �� - �-r" � _ .._. _..... ..._. .—.-r--,-�---- ; . ... .._. ..._. ,�.. __ . � ,;,,�'" '� .. � �� r t ._.... -y�° �__ __ �!'..� � ,_ � 0 ' e Pia n Sit .� �� , � - - - - a .'`�_r, -°. — � �11 �'� '.� ___ � -�� : _ a.�-,; . �.� . . ,.. , „ , .. t:�.- . _,. , , � . _ . _ _:� _ — ._ ..._.. , .. y._�.. �=�i'J�.. '� : : � - ...♦ ...:�.....�,,.. ..�....�.�:""�� I '� , . � ,E�,Y�.� �_�_.__ � � �+ a ► 1 � ,. .�--- � � � ;. .� �� . �� ;, ��► �, � � � �� , .� v�,6 aa � ��s�; �----- �_ �,��, �� — ��,,�.� ��,�. � ��°�yq,��y.l �u rs +�'r �� _.,,� �' .• �-„ �`_.�� '�4•.� y' �t . —_ .�� i ' i � ' ;� �3 �"� �`� I_ : �r � �� ' �� ,;: -� '�,� �. . � �� 4v ir "�� i; � t�� / t'+ �„ •' � � �' !,�� , '�� :��i�= '�"` � � � F,� , :� '`',«� , •: �� p .� j � r, ,.�a �I �v �� ,,,�,, _,i�' -- ---'��.. �.�� V�j �►�a.� �-.�. �" � _ �I ��• '�tr r "�rC�� , �ar�,w .� ,a', :.. � � =i=��-� �� : i �� , ��., � �� , - ��,_ �� , � : � � � _ �. �'v i � � ��a '.r. '��'1L�� .. �J��II; ��'�r,��. ��p�pv•`' �t� �j��',�,S ,.� •, ��f ri�-'�. •ru%d.1 �.�,� , n o . " �: � _ ...r.•. r, � �� : . , ,.=—�� `.�� J�'�as= � IY_� NS f � � $��,�5 �ilT'a •5.. �• � � �� ' � ..��rk '� � ... . GL �76�1. /�iR '�� ; �� . _ � �7�� Y. ,�r � ��_ �, ,,`�, -..:Y;!��.:;"-a.�,..�.�!1id�;�5i�"'J_°�.�su�l�f.�. cs�'��4�YiG��IR4„��,,�� . . =.�.v,''%n'�"`iC��., 3"�.o:.r �. �'17"�� ' cr' _ di � . :_ .;�:..�:..: �� .' ' � ,'. a � . �� `� ��6��r.�.. �_ � _. �- ,,�� 1 �� _ �'i� �"�'��T� �� _' ,.g{� 6450 , � � _ �y�..— � �� ._ ,._ _ _- o r- �--o � _..- , . � . I �' �—o t i i ,. �a q _ ..L . � ��''eJF+i' 3'S �� :'.�� i��,�,,, �!! ' ,, -.. � � ,� 0 n .S � � ��: ;:. � ,:,. ,� � , ��r � _ -� �- - _' .� / � � �J � ` '° @`i��"��`� �� ; � i��' ' . � �-!'� '' �,��, � ,,. ■ �� .� , • _,�,. �� , . � - ��i-� 1n`�- �� .. -��' ■�� i��;��M, _�� -' � -. i ' ��-�" s� /�� i� �� i` :. - � I.. ��r - � • �-� - .�� ;�� , '-' ' _ � .. � �AV � .ir �, t •■ i � . , : ��1 � - _ ; ,yW y ��■ � �� — .- � � �''�� i, I � r � 1� _ .A � : ; �� ' �1n � �� n��l i �� E,.;,�,_ "r"' ii� • �� . i� ll, �. �'�r . � �1 %�• �'i ;- . n��. .� .�„ �� .. �.�.�� , r : _. - -= �;� : �1��,.� '_� _ � .i; ��M I:•• ��:'�;.� . - ,,. ,. ___ •. — _ _.�.�±i:i �� — —�� °._„�� i� �r'� ,,,J�rsi � � - � �; . ._:,;,,,u � -r� _ , i `�, ; ; � : � .. !�_,:u!;,��a i � J . � Cu rre nt Des i n � FRONT ELEVATION Significantly more expensive building that we originally proposed and discussed. Significant design changes from original proposal Lower number of units — therefore less rental income � � �� ' ' ia l issues Outstan in � financ • Bus Sto & Frontage Road Improvements p • Rockfall Barrier Improvements and Implications • Water rights dedication requirement � . � � � . nsit Center Fronta e Roa Tra g I m rove m e nts p • Not included in original pro-forma • Transit Center has driven significant changes to overall project — Grading — Building design/configuration — Access — Trash removal • Located off of the re-development parcel to the west • Significant improvement to existing condition Allows busses to fully depart Frontage Road Accommodates 6 busses at one time • Approximately $1,200,000 . �� Ro ck fa I I Ba rri e r • Property in high hazard rockfall zone. • Geotech consultant recommended 4 alternative m itigation measu res. • Mitigation between Lionsridge Loop and Timber Ridge selected by TOV. • Implications on project design and cost include grading, retainingwalls,drainage,snowstorage removal from parking garage and landscaping. L� . . �Y� � Ro ck fa I I Ba rri e r • Grading and retaining walls necessary to create platform width for barrier — Approx. $1,280,000 • Barrier materials & installation - $210,000 n • Snow melt system on top level of parking garage due to loss of snow removal access from Lionsridge Loop $400,000 � Total rockfall cost to project -$1,890,000 � , i � � � U n reso Iv ed Cost I ss u es • Fronta e Road/l�ransit Sto � p • Rockfall Barrier • Water Rights payment • Tota I u n resolved cost issues $1, 2 00, 000 $1,890,000 $89,000 $3,179,000 � y � � •• � � • Unreso ved P ro ect Issues J • Ground �ease • Option Agreement • Development Agreement • Tax Status • Deed Restriction — Fa i r Housi n Act g • Final title commitment • Final approval for bifurcation of existin bonds g • Ti m i ng Concerns � � �WN �F VAI� . THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on March 22, 2010, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: �J A re uest for the review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61- �\\ q 11, Development P�an Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the ;� redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge site, with up to 359 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road (Timber Ridge Village Apartments)/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for the review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls '�� ,R'� \� exceeding six feet (6') in exposed wall face height, located at 1280 North Frontage Road �'� r� Timber Rid e Village Apartments)/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, � � g and setting forth details in regard thereto (PEC100001) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for the review of a preliminary plan and a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Ma'or Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the creation of Lots 1& 2, Timber Ridge � 1 Subdivision, a re-subdivision of Lots 1-5, Block C, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, located at 1280 North Frontage Road (Timber Ridge Village Apartments)/Lots 1-5, Block �� C, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. �� (PEC 100005) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of public buildings and grounds (fire station), and a request for the review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls exceeding six feet (6') in exposed wall face height, located at 2399 North Frontage Road West/Parcel A, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and 2310 Chamonix Road/Parcel B, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100007, PEC100008) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Belford Watkins Group and VAg, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson � A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for an amendment to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, pursuant to Section 2.8, Adoption and Amendment of the Master Plan, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, to amend the recommendations for transportation improvements in Lionshead (generally located at the Lionshead Parking Structure and the Concert Hall Plaza bus stop) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100009) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates Planner: Warren Campbell The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published March 5, 2010, in the Vail Daily. �J � � TOWN OF VAIL ` Dtpartmtnt of Community Developm�nt 75 South Frontage Road 1/ail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 www. vailgov. com March 2, 2010 Mr. Rick Pylman Pylman & Associates, Inc. 137 Main Street, C107W Edwards, Colorado 81632 Re: Timber Ridge Redevelopment Final Comments Dear Rick, Thank you for submitting the revised plan sets for the review of the Timber Ridge redevelopment project proposed by Vail Timber Ridge, LLC. The purpose of my letter is to provide you with a list of the written comments generated by the Town Staff upon completing our review of the development review application for the redevelopment of Timber Ridge. Once you have had an oppor#unity to review the list of comments please contact me so that we may set up a mutually convenient time to meet and discussion the information contained within the letter. Please address the following comments: Community Development Department Topographic Survey containing the following information: a. Wet stamp and signature of a licensed surveyor b. Date of survey C. North arrow and graphic bar scale d. Scale of 1"=10' or 1"=20') e. Legal description and physical address f. Lot size and buildable area (buildable area excludes red hazard avalanche, slopes greater than 40%, and floodplain) g. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information must be clearly stated on the survey h. Property boundaries to the nearest hundredth (.01) of a foot accuracy. Distances and bearings and a basis of bearing must be shown. Show existing pins or monuments found and their relationship to the established corner. i�� RECYCLED YAPiR i. Show right of way and property lines; including bearings, distances and curve information. j. Indicate all easements identified on the subdivision plat and recorded against the property as indicated in the title report. List any easement restrictions. k. Spot Elevations at the edge of asphalt, atong the street frontage of the property at twenty-five foot intervals (25'), and a minimum of one spot elevations on either side of the lot. I. Topographic conditions at two foot contour intervals m. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a point one foot above grade. n. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittent streams, etc.). o. Alt existing improvements (including foundation walls, roof overhangs, building overhangs, etc.). p. Environmental Hazards (ie. rockfall, debris flow, avalanche, wetlands, floodplain, soils) q. Watercourse setbacks, if applicable (show centerline and edge of stream or creek in addition to the required stream or creak setback) r. Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals on site or in the right-of-way adjacent to the site. Exact location of existing utility sources and proposed service lines from their source to the structure. Utilities to include: Cable TV Sewer Gas Telephone Water Electric s. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales, etc. t. Adjacent roadways labeled and edge of asphatt for both sides of the roadway shown for a minimum of 250' in either direction from property. 2. Architectural Site Plan a. Please provide proposed roof ridge elevations. Indicate existing and proposed grades underneath all roof lines. This information will be used to calculate building height b. Please provide a PE stamped Erosion Control Plan 3. Landscape Plan a. Please provide a detailed legend, listing the type and size (caliper for deciduous trees, height for coniferous trees and gallon size for shrubs) of all the proposed plant materials. A variation in tree heights and sizes is recommended. The tree heights and sizes should be proportionate to the scale, bulk and mass of the proposed buildings. b. Some species of plant materials (Honey locust) shown may conflict with Vail's climate/environment. See recommended plant list for more information. c. Please note temporary and permanent landscape irrigation systems d. Show all existing and proposed retaining walls with top of wall and bottom of watl elevations. e. Minimum size of coniferous trees is 6 feet in height- please note height of proposed coniferous trees. Variation in height is recommended. f. The trees proposed on north side of parking structure appear to be planted in 2 feet of topsoil above structural foam. Please revise the plan set accordingly. g. Please provide more detail on the plant material proposed on the top deck of the parking structure. Please include information on how the trees are planted ie, planter boxes, depth of soil, etc.) 4. Lighting Plan a. Please indicate the type, location and number of all exterior lighting fixtures.' b. Please provide cut sheets for cylinder (wall sconces) and coach lights c. Please provide more detail from the manufacturer's spec sheets regarding whether the proposed e�erior lights are fully cut off fixtures. � �o ✓�r, �� v� � rva � �J �4 uG.�. l �4-S � tM � :�'i � � C�.�� t... (`�� k � U li_v tA-� C.� U'�S��nni �T d. Please demonstrate compliance with the town's adopted outdoor tighting regulations 5. Color and Material Board a. Please submit an exterior color and materials sample board for review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review Board 6. Model a. Please provide a three dimensional computer generated model which includes a sun/shade analysis � `— �� `�" �5�� b. Please depict all deciduous and coniferous trees after ten years of growth 7. Please provide a fully executed utility providers approval and verification form L!��5� 8. Hazard Study; a. A rockfall mitigation improvements plan will be required based on the study and Town ,� Code �; OR �D �! �.i� �,�.�� ,,., ; -�',. �� La��osc�A-�� Fire Department 1. Please provide dimensions of the turning radius of the proposed bus lanes and fire J apparatus. 2. Please identify the "gate or bollards" at the entrance/exit to the proposed 20 foot wide fire �� lane. l�ucz�aF��tl� bu��. �a�v�a.I �,Ilv�-✓z�. 3. Please clearly delineate the common path of egress td the public way on the proposed site plan. 4. Please provide a Life Safety Report and the Code Analysis. �� 3 C 8 �� j C�,a�5 G. Public Works Department ��L � -D�� r,,,1�=, �""-Dt� ��v�c�',�--�� • The comments written in bold text are additions added to the previous list prior to the applicant. 1. The Town of Vail General Notes shall be updated to reflect the most current notes. There are a few missing from this set shown on the Title Sheet. Complete, other than fitling out the Survey benchmark data. 2. Please provide a stamped survey of the site within the Building Permit set. Additional spot elevations will be needed in the office surrounding area and buildings J and K in the areas that may be affected. See community Development Department comments above. 3. Show the newly installed sidewalk at the west end of the project as existing, not proposed, this shall be included in the existing survey conditions. 4. Transit Area; a. Show atl bus turning movements confirming four buses can effectively operate ��independently and six buses can be stacked end to end. Exiting turning movements 5�� are shown. However, please show entering movements as well to confirm four of �� h��.l�, the bus stalls work completely independently. ;�L b. Show bus entry turning movements. Can the main entrance curb return be reduced in `Q `� size? � Z ,,�s�b"�'�� c. Show shelters for both WB and EB directions C`�� W�- • � d. The bike path shall be separate from the transit walk to minimize conflicts. e. Show grading/walls, as necessary, on the west end of the transit loop and up to the "new parking" area west of the clubhouse. f. Show a connection along the north side of the transit loop (w/ stairs as needed) to a crosswalk across the drive entrance to just south of the club entrance. 5. West entrance area/parking; �Q� a. Please show crosswalks at drive entrance ��Q�I ��' � �� 3 b. Extend a walk north from the fire lane/bike path along the east N-S curb line of the entrance. This walk shall lead to the crosswalk/parking/stairwell to club entrance level. c. Where does the iniet at the SE corner of the clubhouse connect to/ Complete. d. There should be a stair access to the parking at the entrance to the club. Complete. e. The minimum clearance between the wall and the club columns should be at least 5', and even that is tight for this public space. Complete. �\�� fUt. The drive lane should be shifted south after the curve as it enters the east existing housing to eliminate the loss of parking on the north side. OFF� �-�- ?�d� �• Z g. The "new parking" area s hou l d be max i m ized at this time. Looks like we may be able to add 2-3 more spaces. Complete. h. The 8 spaces and trash area seems to be a very expensive excavation with 18'-36' walls. Can the spaces be re�ocated elsewhere and the trash moved well forward as well to save the cost of all the retaining and leave this area alone? Complete. i. The Town will need to understand how this redeveloped access point will/may effect development potential of the western portion of the site. I�O The relocated ADA parking space is in a poor location. It conflicts with the Transit 3I Area and is too close to the Frontage Rd. intersection. No Parki� sha��u � within the Transit Area and Transit intersections. m� � e �� ; v�• 6. Fire Lane/Bike Path Areas; a. The fire lane/bike path connection to the entrance drive should feel pe estrianized. Do ,R�� , not provide curb returns. Provide a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp. And discuss �� with fire if this can be necked down to 10'-12' for a very short section to prevent cars �� from entering upon the bike path. �1��r�.t� � b. Both access points on the E and W ends are to be exit only for emergency vehicles and that emergency vehicles access the lane by the main garage access point. Please show fire truck turning movements. �} �a �� `DR�� c. The lane on the west half could be sloped to toward the road easily and sheet flow across the grass slope down to the Frontage Rd curb. The east side could also be raised more quickly from the west entrance at a�4% slope to help eliminate grade difference between the lane and the buildings. Complete. d. The very westLa e and'achoss to theDTrans t a ea. Complete, t ough tlaneed ADA e access to the cross walk to both EB and WB Transit Area. e. The east half of the lane could also sheet flow to the south and into the proposed storm sewer between the S. Frontage Rd and the Lane. Complete. f. The east half could also be brought up quicker to match building FF elevations rather than have stairs. Complete. g�. The east connection to the Frontage Road cannot occur as drawn, this will be easily considered as an access point. The connection should be made with the existing bike 3I ��j path and with a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp. Keeping it 10' 12' for a short � section wilt also be helpful. The entrance has been improved, but now it crosses the Savoy Villas property and can it be narrowed and a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp be added. h. The Frontage Rd. curb shall be wrapped around into the Savoy Villas entrance to the new fire lane/bike path connection. This has been modified, but still needs mountable curb. Does the Savoy Villas driveway need to be widened? i. Fire staging areas have been added. Do these widened areas have to be paved or just flat? And if they need to be hard surface can this be a different material/texture from the bike lane. OA widened area has also been shown for trash. Can trash share the fire/bike lane. This area is getting very wide. How can we control private vehictes from driving �1' � 4 0 7. Engineered analysis on the existing condition of the gabion walts to remain will be required, details on how to connect to existing gabion walls and how to build walls beneath the existing gabion walls will be required�a,s well as construction shoring plans showing no impact to the adjacent properties. �-otiz.T1� GowY�� :c� �° �~�'�� w "'"� �`��• '��-R�'''` ir 8. Frontage Road; a. A CDOT access permit approval shall be required. � b. Full CDOT frontage Rd design plans will be required as a part of this project /� 1p`��.,(' c. A full width overlay will be required as a part of this project for the limits of the Frontage �� ¢V�'` Rd improvements. d. Tapers and decel lengths shall match traffic study recommendations. 190' left turn lane with 10:1 taper and 20:1 lane shift tapers. e. Can any widening be done to the south, maybe part or all of the south shoulder? 9. Accommodations for a bus stop on LRL should be made where the grade meets the road with fill against the parking structure. This could alleviate congestion at the Transit area and function for the eastern half of the project. 3� /5' � 10. Drainage; a. Provide a Drainage Report b. The Town does not require detention for developed sites, unless there is a significant `� � increase in water run-off and existing storm sewer cannot handle the anticipated flow, in C'1 which case the existing system shou�d be upsized or detention can be considered. 1� c. We do require all surface and structured parking drainage to run thru Water Quality (which is shown) '�,,� d. Identify which storm sewers take public water run-off and provide adequate easements Q.,o�� thru the site. A preliminary easement plan has been provided. •�,� •� e. Does the 18" pipe on the NE corner of the parking structure flow over a 10+' retaining � wall? This will need to be piped. Complete. `1, f. In the same area as above an existing storm sewer crosses Lions Ridge Loop, where is �� that water proposed to go. -pa�^ �r �,� . g. Provide storm sewer profiles. 11. Utilities; �� a. Utitity sign offs will be required on the title sheet. b. The option to minimize the utility easement to 30' is shown, is this going to be �� considered? The current plan does not seem to need that additional room. This idea �J� was brought up to hela k a d/or'for add tional aandscaphng 0 the bac k. Comple e Nolt �¢ grading issue in the b requesting a change to existing easement. c. The idea of `meandering' the fire lane/ped path is great, however locating significant landscaping (trees) will not be allowed over utilities. �f it is determined to `meander' the lane, show how the utilities will be protected. t" �-�' �- u`� �°� ��`- L�� d. The depth of the existing water line is needed. �c�l��lc ��.� ��^�- ��' `x( e. All necessary additional easements for utitities will be required. A prelim�nary easement plan has been provided f. How will existing utility services be maintained thru construction? L��' �.�I`�►J �0 'DO�!�� g. Show the existing sewer/water services to the buildings to remain. Will any util�ty�`� ��f r\��R�< services be required to be retocated? ��, �--= �SRu�nb�l t�-a� ��= 12. Please provide a Landscape plan. Sight distance and Utility conflicts will be a key issue. And any landscape in CDOT ROW wi{I require a CDOT landscape permit. Provide a more detailed plan and show sight distance and avoidance of utility conflicts. 5 13. Please provide a lighting plan. How will the project, transit area, Frontage Rdgfire tg �/�bike path be tit?. A preliminary tighting plan layout has been provided show li htin e, fixtures, power source, dimension spacing. The Frontage Road lighting should match the pending Frontage Rd. Lighting Master Plan. �� .A, , �.�,�, ..�.� �ti,ti �� ;?r7! f 14. Building; h. The Environmental Impact Report indicates that the popu�ation of this new development �,o Z will be �552-570 individuals housed in 352 units as compared to �424 in 106 individuats �U�r �, housed in 106 units today. The existing calculation is based on 106 2 bedroom units 'l� o� with 4 persons per unit. What is the developed population based on? The current 352 o/p .`N �� 5��unit count co 8an�iv duals.d Ple se cla ify the pr po ed populathonrand tpleasepclaaifyn f would be 108 whether there are 102 vs 106 units being removed. ��. The circulation for the storage/trash/mail room seems to be inadequate. At a minimum ��p� short term parking spaces need to be assigned in this area. The Traffic study indicates approximately 30 vehicles will be entering and 50 vehicles will be exiting during a peak hour. Some percentage of those trips will want to stop in this area, and need accommodations to do so. Moving the access west may help with circulation. This may be done by swapping unit location. j. The trash circulation and locations seem inadequate for this large of a devetopment. Having only one point to dump trash and only accessible from inside the parking structure is inadequate. Having a trash chute on both sides of the parking structure (E&V1� and accessible from inside the building along with one on the very far west and east side of theddress the bo e�commentb�Please prov de'written narrat ve ofed but does not a trash plan. � k. The trash chute should also be coupled with a recycle area/chute. I. How will the Bike storage areas be secure/controlled/accessed? How many bikes will it hold? 76 bikes are being proposed, with no storage on the 4�' and 5�' floor. That is approximately 1 bike pe� 7 bedrooms, is this reasonable? Why no storage on 4�' and 5t`' floors? �oG v�-rt=c� o� '�L 5+�' Flc� � I� +� - m. Is the storage area secured by a gate/door{? A door is shown. n. An emergency/service access from the top deck would be very functional for service and � an emergency/secondary access to this large of a structure. ►�o�� v� c��=o •c� ��j o. Show typical dimensions for parkin a�S eSe 9x19'and garaged/covered Iare gx1 gmeet �� Town code. All exposed surface sp �' Cross-over aistes are supposed to be 30'. 3)15 p. Show elevations for parking garage. Complete. q. There are walks shown at the entrance at the parking garage, are these raised or at grade. Complete. r. Please show drainage for the parking structure. Where witl it tie into the sanitary sewer(this wifl require ERWSD approval) 5`-k�"-�` �'�'� 3�i5 � s. Show Snow storage calculations. Complete. Where will the top deck snow storage go�� ` t. Where do the roof drains daylight or connect to the storm sewer 5v��-�►� { D►l 5' u. Generic grading is provided in the courtyards. Provide specifc design, hardscape, ped paths, landscape etc... v. Does the dumpster meet Town bear proof enclosure requirements? Complete. w. Some of the units on the ground floor are only accessible from the outside and not the garage without going up one floor to then back down. Should there be an interior �,�^� corridor to access these units and also the elevator tower'? I�,a � U�� R ��' x. The upper levels do not match with the garage floor plate so there is ramping and stairs to each level. �K � y. Multiple garage leveis show stairweli exits that go no where, what is the intent? Complete. z. The 4�' and 5�' floor garage level plans show a different entrance into the buiidings on the east side? Why the difference? Tthe 5"' floor does not show an access door for the east side of the garage to the building. Elevations that are now snown provide the answer. aa. The ptans reference Garage Rlans by others. When will they be provided? 12�=vhov� i.tan�� 15. Easements shall be provided for drainage, the fire/bike path, access to the west existing property, transit area and rockfall mitigation fence 16. The Developer shall be responsible for �ing the fire lane. 17. Traffic Study; �4�'"'�'"��`� bb. The Traffic study will need to be updated, once the final program in the development is � � determined. �j; �� cc. Note on the Traffic generation summary that the 171 units is based on occupancy not capacity. dd. The tra�c engineer should comment on the circulation issue as stated above regarding the maitroom/storage/trash area. 18. Transit projections; �e.'A more specific Town bus impact analysis should be made. As indicated in the Tra�c �" study the Town's bus headways will probably not change as much as suggested, although shadow buses will increase and this will impact number of buses, operations, maintenance of buses. This wilt also provide a bigger incentive to construct Simba Run underpass and the need for a line haul route at faster headways at peak times. �. j#!' The project removes 106 units roughly equivalent to a maximum of 424 people. The new development provides 352 units roughly equivalent to 1088 people(This assumes 2 per bedroom). The increase of people on this site is �260%. The existing peak ped. counts using transit (based on counts on 12/30/09) was 112, which was based on �86% O� occupancy rate. So at full occupancy this could have been 130 people. An increase of 260% would then result in a transit ped need of 338 at full occupancy, 2 per bedroom. If the LRL bus stop was installed and 10% of the transit use went there, then the Frontage Rd. Transit Area would need to carry 305 people in an hour. The existing bus at peak times currently arrives 2/3rds full with a total capacity of about 50. A shadow bus typically follows this bus once it arrives at Timber Ridge to allow for an additional capacity of 50. Additional analysis will be required to understand the true impact to the Town bus system, regarding operations, maintenance, new buses, new positions, etc... �,�. This additional need would have to be covered by the Red and Green routes today, but could be supplemented by a new Line Haul route in the future if the Simba Run underpass were built. �� t�f. In addition, there is currently a safety hazard with pedestrians crossing the interstate at this location in order to sho►t cut travel to the Cascade employment center/lift access. This is likely to increase due to almost 3x the pedestrian population as there is now. A I II ' te this concern although probably not eliminate �� ,��( Simba Run underpass would he p a evia , �J J��, the problem. To eliminate the problem adequate pedestrian barriers would need to be "��installed to divert all people away from crossing the interstate. �,� �� 19. The development will require a public art component. � C:o��y �-r2c� Again, once you have had an opportunity to review the list of comments please contact me so that we may set up a mutually convenient time to meet and discussion the information contained within the letter. You can reach me most easily by telephone at (970) 376-2675 or by e-mail at qruther(a�vailaov.com 7 � Sincerely, George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail xc: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer Mike McGee, Fire Marshall Greg Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation 3�� ' ��D�.Sn2i �Mz.l � r Rc �.,t ( �-ri a a.l '�'o �Rcx�cr �RS . '�J Yj v[�(•Z IA-z1T'�.> �� ,t i R�=� - i ' Exn=�� ot� 5t�a � �eoRs . ' Wlo�tc. • L�c��c. .. i�l,�,_( ✓�-PPt�c'v �o GC��.v,5v 5 i c� u• or-f' . �� Co�h��.rtoy 1N� . g February 2b, 2010 Tawn of Vail Attn: George Ruther 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colozado 81657 (�-uther@vailgov. com) Job No. 109 310C Subject: Rockfall Mitigation Alternative Selection Inforrnation, Proposed Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment, 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorada Dear Mr. �Zuther: As requested, we are providing preliminary cost and other information that may be considered in your selection of rockfall mitigation alternatives at the subject site in accordance with our proposal to Town of Vail dated �January 28, 2010. Hepworth-Pawlak ��;,. �� Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a geologxc��'itetassessment and preliminary `�`�6,�",,� � rockfall risk and mitigation study and present�d>o �findings in a report dated December 17, 2009, Job No. 109 3108. ^ i�''\ r*�� Four opt�ons to mitigate the rockfall risk �t�the project were presented in our previous report. Option 1 is a wire rope net b`� e`t'°located to the south of Lions Ridge Laop at the back of the buildings. Option 2 is a wire rope net barrier just to the north of Lions Ridge Loop. Option 3 is a wire rope net harrier at the base ofthe outcrop start zone, and Optzon 4 is an anchored steel mesh at the outcrop start zone. The MSE wall for Option 1, next to the buildings, has been eliminated by the Town of Vail and has not been considered. A material supplier (Geobrugg) and an installation contractor (Yenter) have been consulted to obtairr preliminary cost estimates and installation methods for the CRSP 9d% probability level, as summarized on Table 3 of our December 17, 2009 report. The selection matrix for geotechnical factors is presented in the attached Table 1. If a CRSP 98% probability level (Table 4 of our December 17, 2009 report) is selected, the cost for Option 1 would increase by about 25% and the cost for Options 2 and 3 would � Town �f Vail February 26, 2010 Page 2 increase by about 15%. Option 4 does not have a probability component. The AXI fence is self supported (essentially without horizontal restraints) and the RXI fence is restrained with tie-backs anchored in the hillside. There should be negligible maintenance costs until a rockfall occurs, at that tinne the rockfall wili need to be removed and the fence repaircd. The mitigation effectiveness of Options 1, 2 and 3 are considered the sarne for the selected CRSP probability level with Option 4 being the rnost effective. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. S incerely, HEPW�RTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Rev. by: RGM � �� -�`✓�� ".. SLP/ : �`� � . /�` Attachment: Geotechnical Selection Matrix� �� `��: : � :;� � � `\ ��` �� } ��`:: Job No. 109 310C C'�teCh 7ob No: 109 310C Geotechnical Selection Matrix Vail Timber Ridge Rockfall Mitigation Optian Barrier Height Length Installation MaEerial Installation Total T e Method Cost Cost Cost 1 AXI 15 ft 900' Automated' $130/ft $100/ft $214k 2 RXI 11 ft 940' Part $180/ft $200/ft $380k Autamated 3 RXI 10 ft 1Q60' Airlift/ $165/ft $400/ft $600k Hand . 4 TECCO N/A 113,220 Airlift/ $2.25/sf $3.50%sf $650k Nettin sf Hand No�es: 1) Based on CRSP 90% probability level 2)- Costs are for feasibility relative comparisons only 3} Maintenance costs not included 4) No access trails are assumed for all options 5) All barriers and netting are colored 0 � � � Bid Submitted: 02/19/2010 Bid Honored for: 45 Days Project: Timber Ridge Frontage Road Improvments General Contractor: CF Jordan Construction Services Scope: Earthwork, Utilities, Demolition, C.I.P. Concrete, EXCAVATIIVC'i WITH EXPERTIB�! � � �'; . �' � � � . "'�'.�,., `W. � . � '=�. 77 Metcalf Road Suite 304 � P O Bo� 2058 �von CO 81620 � (970) 748-8804 office � (970) 748-8803 fax � � C � tiE�Ch HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL February 26, 2010 Town of Vail Hepworth-Pawlak GeotechnicaL, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone:970-945-7988 Fax:970-945-R454 cnniiL 1��,�,ar:r��1�F��r��trrl�.c�,m Attn: George Ruther 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 (gruther@ vai lgo v. co m) Job No. 109 310C Subject: Rockfall Mitigation Alternative Selection Information, Proposed Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment, 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Ruther: As requested, we are providing preliminary cost and other information that may be considered in your selection of rockfall mitigation alternatives at the subject site in accordance with our proposal to Town of Vail dated January 28, 2010. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a geologic site assessment and preliminary rockfall risk and mitigation study and presented our findings in a report dated December 17, 2009, Job No. 109 310B. Four options to mitigate the rockfall risk to the project were presented in our previous report. Option 1 is a wire rope net barrier located to the south of Lions Ridge Loop at the back of the buildings. Option 2 is a wire rope net barrier just to the north of Lions Ridge Loop. Option 3 is a wire rope net barrier at the base of the outcrop start zone, and Option 4 is an anchored steel mesh at the outcrop start zone. The MSE wall for Option 1, next to the buildings, has been eliminated by the Town of Vail and has not been considered. A material supplier (Geobrugg) and an installation contractor (Yenter) have been consulted to obtain preliminary cost estimates and installation methods for the CRSP 90% probability level, as summarized on Table 3 of our December 17, 2009 report. The selection matrix for geotechnical factors is presented in the attached Table 1. If a CRSP 98% probability level (Table 4 of our December 17, 2009 report) is selected, the cost for Option 1 would increase by about 25% and the cost for Options 2 and 3 would increase by about 15%. Option 4 does not have a probability component. The AXI fence is self supported (essentially without horizontal restraints) and the RXI fence is restrained with tie-backs anchored in the hillside. There should be negligible maintenance costs until a rockfall occurs, at that time the rockfall will need to be removed and the fence repaired. The mitigation effectiveness of Options 1, 2 and 3 are considered the same for the selected CRSP probability level with Option 4 being the most effective. Parker 303-841-7ll9 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 � Town of Vail February 26, 2010 Page 2 If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PA Steven L. Paw Rev. by: RGM SLP/kac CAL, INC. Attachment: Geotechnical Selection Matrix Job No. 109 310C _lc�!±7LR�s�] ��"►, Job No: 109 310C Table 1 Geotechnical Selection Matrix Vail Timber Ridge Rockfall Mitigation Option Barrier Height Length Installation Material Installation Total Ty e Method Cost Cost Cost 1 AXI 15 ft 900' Automated $130/ft $100/ft $210k 2 RXI 11 ft 990' Part $180/ft $200/ft $380k Automated 3 RXI 10 ft 1060' Airlift/ $165/ft $400/ft $600k Hand 4 TECCO N/A 113,220 Airlift/ $2.25/sf $3.50/sf $650k Nettin sf Hand Notes: 1) Based on CRSP 90% probability level 2) Costs are for feasibility relative comparisons only 3) Maintenance costs not included 4) No access trails are assumed for all options 5) All barriers and netting are colored U , �w � � tE�h HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL_ February 26, 2010 Town of Vail Hepworth-Pawlak Geoeechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Gle»wood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone:970-945-7988 1-�aX:970-945-8454 ,�mail: I��,��e�o�irh�,e�_� �r��._h �: ��m Attn: George Ruther 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 (gruther@vailgov. com) Job No. 109 310C Subject: Rockfall Mitigation Alternative Selection Information, Proposed Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopment, 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Ruther: As requested, we are providing preliminary cost and other information that may be considered in your selection of rockfall mitigation alternatives at the subject site in accordance with our proposal to Town of Vail dated January 28, 2010. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a geologic site assessment and preliminary rockfall risk and mitigation study and presented our fmdings in a report dated December 17, 2009, Job No. 109 310B. Four options to mitigate the rockfall risk to the project were presented in our previous report. Option 1 is a wire rope net barrier located to the south of Lions Ridge Loop at the back of the buildings. Option 2 is a wire rope net barrier just to the north of Lions Ridge Loop. Option 3 is a wire rope net barrier at the base of the outcrop start zone, and Option 4 is an anchored steel mesh at the outcrop start zone. The MSE wall for Option 1, next to the buildings, has been eliminated by the Town of Vail and has not been considered. A material supplier (Geobrugg) and an installation contractor (Yenter) have been consulted to obtain preliminary cost estimates and installation methods for the CRSP 90% probability level, as summarized on Table 3 of our December 17, 2009 report. The selection matrix for geotechnical factors is presented in the attached Table 1. If a CRSP 98% probability level (Table 4 of our December 17, 2009 report) is selected, the cost for Option 1 would increase by about 25% and the cost for Options 2 and 3 would increase by about 15%. Option 4 does not have a probability component. The AXI fence is self supported (essentially without horizontal restraints) and the RXI fence is restrained with tie-backs anchored in the hillside. There should be negligible maintenance costs until a rockfall occurs, at that time the rockfall will need to be removed and the fence repaired. The mitigation effectiveness of Options 1, 2 and 3 are considered the same for the selected CRSP probability level with Option 4 being the most effective. Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 . r � Town of Vail February 26, 2010 Page 2 If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PA Steven L. Pawlak, Rev. by: RGM SLP/kac 0 � 9 522� : . . : � ,3� �'/ ��;� �o,�, 3 00 0 J'J °: ��N�,L E�''� °Cj°� �l� �OF C�1-�'�� CAL, INC. Attachment: Geotechnical Selection Matrix Job No. 109 310C GeCPt@Ch �,, Job No: 109 310C Table 1 Geotechnical Selection Matrix Vail Timber Ridge Rockfall Mitigation Option Barrier Height Length Installation Material Installation Total T e Method Cost Cost Cost 1 AXI 15 ft 900' Automated $130/ft $100/ft $210k 2 RXI 11 ft 990' Part $180/ft $200/ft $380k Automated 3 RXI 10 ft 1060' Airlift/ $165/ft $400/ft $600k Hand 4 TECCO N/A 113,220 Airlift/ $2.25/sf $3.50/sf $650k Nettin sf Hand Notes: 1) Based on CRSP 90% probability level 2) Costs are for feasibility relative comparisons only 3) Maintenance costs not included 4) No access trails are assumed for all options 5) All barriers and netting are colored � FINAL PLAT TIMBER RIDGE SUBDIVISION A RESUBDIVISION OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION BLOCK G, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS I, 2, 3, 4� 5 TOWN OF VAIL, GOUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO LAND USE SUAMMY pqpGFl AREP 20NING ADDRE55 LOT 1 O.B10 AC. HOUSING DISTRICT 1280 NORTH FAOFlTAGE ROA� WEST LOT2 52/2AG. HOUSING DISTRICT 1260NORiHFRONTAGEflO�D'NEST 10.082 AC. GENEHALNOTES: 1) DATEOFSUflVEV:�ECEM16ER,21109. 2) PROPERTY DESCRIPTON: LOT51, 2. 3, s a 5. A RESUBDIVISION OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION, BLOCNC, ACCORDING TO THE %AT THEFiC-0F PECOflDED JUNE 8,1913 W BOOK 229 AT PAGE 458, UNPER REGEPTION No.125309. IN THE OFFlCE OF THE EAGIE CAUNTY CLERK AND qECORDEP. 3) BEAFINGS BASED UPON THE LINE COhNECTING THE MONUMENTS AS DESCRIBED HEREON MMKING TME SOIRHWE5TERLY AND NORTNWESTERLV GORNERS OF SAIO LOT 1. BEING NJT0931'W (SEE SNEET 2�. 6� MONUMENTATION AS WDICATED HEREON. 5) THESOLEPURPOSEOFTHISPL4TISTOSUBDIVIDESAIDLOTS1,2.3,Id5TOGREATElAT5132.RNDTOCREAiEPND VqGATE CERTAIN EASEMENTS PS INDICATED HEREON. g) THEBOUNORRVDIMENSIOHS,EASEMENTSMlORIGHTSOFWAYSHOMMMEREONAREPERTHEFECORpPLATFORTHE SUBJECT PROPEflTY FND TITLE SEARCH PEFFORMED BV STEWFRT TITLE GUPFMlTV COMPAN�.ORDER No.909653, DATEU APRIL 30. 2009. ATl'30 A.M ]) NOTICE: PCGORDING TO COIOPADO LAW YOU MUST GOMMENGE ANY LEfiAL ACTION BPSED UPON PNY DEFECT IN THIS SIIflVEV WIiHIN THREE YEAR3 AFfEP VOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCM DEFECT. W NO EVENT, M/YN�Y RGTION BpSED UPON MIY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEV BE COMMENCED MOflE THAN TEN YEARS FflOM?HE �ATE OFCEfi11FlGRT10N SHOVJfJ HEREON. 8� THEPRRCELSSHOWNHEFEONARESU&IEGTTOPROTEGTIVECOVENMITSRECARDEDJULY25,19691N800K215ATPRGE 6G9, M!� AMENOED IN THE INSTflUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 219 AT PAGE 235, PNU ADDRIONPL DECLMATION OF PROTEGTIVE COVENPNTS FOfl BLOGI( C, LIONS RIDGE SUBDIVISION RECOROED JUNE 8.1913 IN BOOK 229 AT PAGE 0.5/. 9) THE SU&IEGT PROPEflTY IS ENCUMBERED BY AN UNDER6ROlIND RIGHT-0E-WAV EASEMENTGRANTEPTO NOLY CR0.CS ELEGipIC /SSOCIATION, INC. PECOR�ED OCTOBER 15, 1980, IN BOOK 311 PT PA6E 210.15 RECEPTION No.20]588. THE OESCRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT IS A TEN FOOt WIDE STRIP FOLLOWINCa THE UTILfiY L1NE5 0.S BIIRIED MID IS INSUFFlGIENiLY DIMENSIONED TO RCCURATELY OEGICT THE LOCATION OF TME EASEMEM HEflEON. 10) ALLREFERENCESTOREGOPDDOCUMENTSARETOTHEREALESTATEftECARD50FTHEOFFICEOFTHEEAGLECAUMY. GOLOflADO, CLEflK MID RECOPDER. Gore Range Surveying, ��c __ ..... — _ oe�: �s Arae, �6 3i52C �' �� e74�'cc59 • r� (4':Oi 479-0Ci5 Certificate ot DedicaUon and Ownershfp Know all men by lhese presenls that Timber Ritlge Aflortlable Housing Coiporation, a Cobratlo rwnprofit coiporaGOn being wle owne� �� ee simple an0 U.S. Bank National AssoGation as mortgagee of all that real pmperry situated in the Town ot Vail, Eagle County, Colorado tlesa�bed as folbws: A Resubdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C. Lols 1, 2, 3, 4 8 5 per the pla� ihereM recorded June 8, 1973 in Book 229 at Page 458 under Receptian No. 125309 in the oHice ot lhe Eagle County CIeAc a�d Rewrder, wniaining i u.uo2 acres more or iess; nave by ihese piesei�ts iaid oui, piaiied and subdivide�i ine same inio iois ard blocks as shown on ihis final plat untler the name antl s�yle of Timber Ridge Subdivision, a subdivision in llie Town of Vail, County ot Eagle; antl does hereby accep[ the responsibility for the completion of requiretl improvements; and tloes hereby detlicate and set aparl all ot the public roads and other public improvements and places as sYrown on the accompanying plat to the use of the public forever; antl does hereby tledicate those porHOns of saitl real property which are indicated as ea5ement on the aaompanying plat as easaments for the purpose shovm hereon; and tloes hereby g2nt �he n9ht to install and maintain necessary siructures to the entity responsible tor p�oviding Me services tor which [he easemenis are estalNishetl. EXECUTED Mis daY o� A'�" �--- Owner. Timber Ridge AHOrdab�e Housing Corporation Adtlress:75 S. FronNage Rtl. West a Colo2do nonprofit wrporation Vail, CO 81657 STATE OF 1 )SS COUNTYOF. ) The foregoing Certificate oi Detlication and Ownership was acknowledged bekre me Mis _tlay of A.D.. 20_, bY � of Timber Ridge AHordable Housing Corpora[ioq a Colorado nonprofil corpora�ion. My Commission expires: Witness my hantl and oHicial seal. Notary PuUlic Mortgagee: U.S. Bank National Association By: Title: STATE OF 1 1� COUNTYOF 1 Atltlress: The foregoing CeAificate of Dedication antl Ownership was acknowled9ed betore me Mis_tlay oi . A.D., 20� by az � U.S. Bank Natlonal AssociaHon. My Commiwion expires: Witness my hand and oHicial seal. Notary Title CertHicate Stewart Tlle Gueranty Company tloe5 hareby certity that MB Title to all lands 5hown upon ihi5 plaz have been examined antl is vested in Timber Ridge Atiordable Housing Corporation, a Colorado nonprofii corporetion, ihat tlUe to such lands �s free antl clear of all liens and encumbrar�ces, except as folbws: Deed ot Trust to U.S. Bank National Association, recorUed July 17, 2003, uMer Recep6on No. 840810. DateE this _ tlay of AD., 20_ Agent signature Addiess: 97 Main StreeR Suite VJ201 Edxaids, CO 81 fi32 Agent name Surveyor's CertNicffie I, do hereby certify ihat I am a Professional Land Surveyor licensetl under ihe laws of ihe State oi Colorado, ihat ihis pla[ is true, cortect a�tl complete as laitl out, platted, detlica[etl and shown hereon, Ihat wch plat wa5 made hom an accurate survey of saitl p�operty by me and under my supervision and cortectly shows Me localbn antl dimensions ot ihe lots, easements and sireets oi said subdivision as ihe same are sfaketl upon Me grouiM in compliance with applicable regulations go�ernin9 the subdNision of land. In Witness Whereot, I have set my hand antl seal this _ day of AD., 20_ Samuel H. Ecker Colorado P.L.S. No.30091 Town Council Cert'rficate This plat approvetl by the Town Council of the Town of Vail Ihis _day of . atl. 20� for filing with the Clerk and FecoMer of Eagle County, Colo2tlo antl for ihe conveyance to Me Town oi Vail ot Me public dedications shown hereon; subject to the provision ihat approvel in no way obligates Me Town of Vail tor maintenance of roads Cedicated to ihe public un[il construction of improvemenis thereon shall have been completetl in accordance wi[h Town of Vail speciiications, and the Town Council ot ihe Town of Vail has by subsequeM recoWtion agreetl lo undertake maintenance ot the same. This approval tloes not guarantee ihal sol� co�tlitions, subsurface geology, ground water wn0itions, or flooding conditions of any lat shown hereon are such that a building permit or any other requiretl permit will be issuetl. This approval is wi[h ihe understanding tha[ all expenses inwlving all improvemenis requiretl shall be [he responsibiliry ot the subdivider arM not Me Town of Vail. ATTEST: Ma r Town ot' ail, Coloratlo Town Council, Town of Vail. Cob2tlo Planning and Environmental Commission Certiflpte This final plat was approvetl by the Town of Vail Planning antl Environmental Commission this_day of a.d. 20_ ATTEST: Town Clerk Chairman Town oi Vail, Coloretlo Town of Vail Plannirg arb Environmental Commission Certificate of 7axes Paid I, the untlersigne4 tlo hereby certiy that the entire amount of ta�ces antl assessments due antl payable upon all parcels of real estate tlescribed on this plat are paitl in full. Dated this _ day of A.D.. ZO_. Treasurer of Eagle Counry Clerk and Recorder's Certificate 7his Plat was iiletl tor recortl in the OHice of the Clerk antl Recortler at _o'cbckJ on this_ day of 20� antl is duly recortletl at Fiecepibn No. Clerk antl Recortler gY; � DePuIY � � <'� �� SE 2/9/2010 � � , ,��„w �„�- r`: � � .:a < . ��l .� � ororm en '� m..vc mn: 03-092PLA. � �: 03-092 .wen 1 v 1 FINAL PLAT TIMBER RIDGE SUBDIVISION A RESUBDIVISION OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION BLOCK C, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS I, 2, 3, 4� 5, TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO INOILA7E5 SET N0. 5 REBAR W/ A 1}� ALUMINUM CAP P.LS. NO. 30091 / M1OCA / OOQ � �\QGE \ � v° d ^�'�� e 1� t / 15.16' _G.� ` / 10.00' RADIUS = 1771.95' DELTA = 11'54'12" FWND a �� P�T�C CAP ON A N0. 5 REBAR P.LS. N0. 2183 15' DRNNAGE AND U11UT' EASEMENT � CREATEO BY 7H15 PLAT RADIUS � 1781.95' / SAVOY �LLAS / CONDOMINIUMS (REC. No. 642105) / / v� A1ED BY THISPLATSEMENT �537'09'31"E — 233.28' � N41K3�21'E wCROACNMENT EASEMENT . 7.25' (REC. No. 194473) ARC = 368.13, DELTA � 1132'26' \ /� 548'36'39'E I ARC � 369.29' / � � 53.76' TANGENT = 184J2� r^r+cE"T `,es.3,• /�`'' \ A \ sa,7s•z,-w , CHORD = 368.63' CHORD = 367.46, BEARING = 553'35�53�'M / / �/\ �J� 4.90' � "0� BRG = N53'35'00°E 54836'39'E �� ° • � i .�.�o• ` pPPPROXIAIATE � ` � � LOCAl10N OF Q o BURIED ELECTRIC � � � �[ _ �$. �� L1NE5 � , . �� V / (SEE NOTE B)/ ..'.. N1028�13�W' �9,9��_ � -KV r � \ / 70' DRAINAGE EASEMENT , - ,` r • `= � �✓ % �e.. y �, . ♦ �c,J► °,^ ��:� `r`� ('� • ' S � ,�� , �� ,� . ��, [� y / ,o°° -�� ,a � �� a��0� ,� • TIUTY 8 DR/E EASEMENT � / / � VACATED � THIS PLAT \ �/ \ \ O� 10' DRAINAGE AND 11nLITY EASEMENT � D >\ \\ � >��,5p°+1 CREATED BY THIS P41T � � � � �A .� � ��,tia +fi /� � \/ / J,�{ e�° Sti�� / � \ O \ \ \ / � �FJR�� n\ i � � �`�°", �� \ \ / � LOT L �/ VACATEDPB�VPTHIS PLnT \ 5.212 pCRES / � \ � ��' $" � A \ � /✓ / � 1260 � / . \6O I� / %� F N O / � N17'IS'24'E / � > � � �5y PRaa�n ur+e _/ � � �en�o er n+is Pur / � � /V / / s � ,� o <� S/� -'�/ �'O / \ � �TILITY EASEMENT � C \ � / 69p�,6 VACATED BY THIS PLAT / < �� / BUS 5T \ D ACCE55 EASEMENT /� C \ O � � CREATED BY THIS \PUT N \ \ � �/ \ ` / � � / i � N �V � V PROPERTY IJNE J ' \ N� � ( VACA7ED BY 7X15 PLAT � � / \an � J O \ � � �/�� i �� K/ 0�� / C � � 537b9'71'E S P N O /�/ / 19.06' \ � � s �O �.�T R 5 � —� � �� . � /O izeo � Q \ � � ` � � � � � � / . y�j \ � INDICAlES THE OUTIJNE \� M � ov �w exisnNC eunnir+c � � �. � O �i �e9s�� \ � i'�> /Uty E 425j091 � 3�9 53 p� � � L20VT�N� �W a�„� \ � � o �i �a�'S7,L583 PARCEL B 9"�ti•'� \ � � / NO LION�S RIDGE SUBDIVISION `'�`��p � ^ ; g FlUNG No. 2 � �.A� �/. (REC. No. 121219) � • �� 1��- Gore Range FWND 1}' ALUMINUM CAF SET IN CONCREIE Surveying, LLC P.LS. NO. 2568 __ ...— � ........ ..:`� ,^.,G Ccz 15 .. Av�:, GQ 8;52� ..,.. / I � i , , __._ .__. . I � 1" j INDICATES SET NO. 5 REBAR W/ A 1�' ALUMINUM CAP P.LS. N0. 30091 3Z�� / . ��— Z 67V4'43'E N m/ UTILJTY 8 URAINAGE EASEMENT O/ � 59.71' v°� VACATED BY � PLAT \ ,S • S / ° 'Q �� ^ V� y (y 56� 63?1 ^/ � \ O \ , \ �P` \ /"( U1ILJTY EFSEMENT i � � \ �� ,� �� 95\ VACAhD BY THIS PLAT � PROPERN LINE I ^/ �O I VACATED BY 7H15\ AT \\ 19�' �Q � / �O / � � � \ / 1 O `�• � \ � PROPFRTY LINE � / OJ� `�• � � VACATEU BY THIS PLAT 'Ci O ` � SET A PK NAIL VATM � ( /�� G (// / A JO Q_�y � A P.L.S Nso. 30 9 � \ �\ / \ / 5�Y � �" \ N52'42'30'E y 28.66' �/ / ��• S \ � � �� °'�• ,, ��\�� -� �. ��.� ��m�, s >y � ��P� yti � aa s�.l �^ H � �G 5 � �_ I 1< . � $. '� �oFFicE� /� / \ 7 \ , BUS SHELTER EASEAIENT (REC. No. 795694) Ay.�P�' C \�� ACCE55, DRAINAGE ANO UTILITI' EASEMENT CREATED BY 7HI5 PUi GRAPHIC SCALE ,m ='° �IN��> 1 ,o�n a so rc �-. .. � . _ � ' ,' . �,� ,�.,,� s� a,� 2/9�zo,o ��eY S£ ��.�,��:03-092PLi 03-092 scrT Z o` 2 e � S-rv�r� C� I � 25` lo MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: January 25, 2010 SUBJECT: A request for a work session for review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 359 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation Planner: George Ruther I. SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman, of Pylman & Associates, are requesting a work session with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to present the proposed redevelopment plans for the redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge w Village Apartments, located at 1280 North Frontage Road. Presentation and discussion topics include: • A presentation of the revised preliminary plan set (site plan, landscape plan, grading plan, building elevations, etc.) • A presentation of the 3-D sketch up model • A power point presentation of initial staff technical comments and input DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicants are proposing to redevelop the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Apartments development site and construct a five-story tall building extending 800 feet along the North Frontage Road (Attachment A— Vicinity Map). The new building will contain up to 359 new employee housing units capable of housing 570 employees with the existing western half of the site remaining operational throughout the redevelopment process. A new five-level enclosed parking garage will be constructed on the site along with improved public transit facilities to meet the minimum parking and transportation needs of the development. As this is a work session, the applicants and staff are not requesting a final review at this time. Instead, the Commission is being asked to actively engage in a presentation and discussion about the proposed project. As such, the staff recommends that the Commission provides direction on the following question: "Are there any additional submittal materials that the Commission requires of the applicants to ensure that the proposal can be properly evaluated?" III. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Town Code Housing (H) Zone District 12-61-1: PURPOSE: The housing district is intended to provide adequate sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other residential zoning districts. It is necessary in this district to provide development standards specifically prescribed for each development proposal orproject to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 ofthis title and to provide for the public welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as conditional uses, which are intended to be incidental and secondary to the residential uses of the district. The housing district is intended to ensure that employee housing permitted in the district is appropriately /ocafed and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the allowed types of uses. 12-6/-13: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located fo produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are infegrated with existing open space and recreation areas. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other applicable plans. Section 12-17 Variances 12-17-1: PURPOSE: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical 2 � difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict orliteral interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulafions may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic orphysical conditions on the site orin the immediate vicinity; orfrom ofherphysicallimitations, streetlocations orconditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. 8. Development Standards Excepted: Variances may be granted only with respect to the developmenf standards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site dimensions, setbacks, distances between buildings, height, density control, building bulk control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site development, and parking and loading requirements; or with respect to the provisions of chapter 11 of this title, governing physical development on a site. C. Use Regulations Not Affected.� The power to grant variances does not extend to the use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is provided by chapter 16, "Conditional Use Permits'; and by section 12-3-7, "Amendment" of this title. IV. DISCUSSION TOPICS Completeness of the application submittal • Subdivision application • Variance application Site Circulation • Pedestrian/bicycle path alignment • Internal parking garage circulation • Public transit stop circulation • Emergency vehicle turning radii and pathways of travel • Pedestrian overpass • ADA accessibility • Site access relocation Scale, Bulk and Mass and Compatibility with the Surrounding Structures and Development • Adjacent uses and surrounding structures • 3-D sketch up model • Building elevations and articulation • Landscape plan Site Plan Design • Grading at the Clubhouse entrance Location of the electrical transformers • Access to exterior courtyards • Pedestrian/Bicycle path configuration • Snow shedding plan • Sun/Shade analysis Development Standards • Building height 3 C t� u f�Ty rh2'p �r�; IS • Setbacks • Parking/Parking Management Plan • Deed restriction • Site grading and retaining wall design Geologic Hazard and Rockfall Mitigation Report • Four mitigation alternatives for consideration Next Steps • The final review of the application by the Planning and Environmental Commission is currently scheduled for Monday, February 8, 2010. • What, if any, additional information does the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission need from the town staff and/or the applicant to aid in final review of the proposed project? V. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 1280 North Frontage Road Legal Description: Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Filing No. 1 Zoning: Housing District Land Use Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Current Land Use: Medium Density Residential Dwellings Lot Size: 5.24 acres/ 228,254 square feet Geologically Sensitive Areas: High Severity Rockfall Development Standard Min. Lot Area: Min. Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Max. Building Height: Max. GRFA: Max. Site Coverage: Min. Landscape Area: Required determined by PEC 20' (north) 20' (east) 20' (west) 20' (south) determined by PEC determined by PEC 55% unless at least 75% of parking is covered and approved by the PEC 30% Min. Parking: Per Chapter 10 (693 spaces), or a max. 25% reduction (520 spaces) approved by the PEC based upon the Parking Management Plan provided 4 Proposed 228,254 sq. ft(5.24 acres) 25' (north) 20' (east) 50' (west) 54' (south) TBD 252,994 sq. ft. 91,100 sq. ft. (41 %) 68,736 sq. ft. (30%) 547 spaces VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Current Land Use Zoninq Land Use Desiqnation North: Residential Two-Family Primary/Secondary Low Density Residential South: Interstate 70 ROW Not Zoned Not Designated East: Residential High Density Multiple Family High Density Residential Residential West: US Postal Service High Density Multiple Family High Density Residential Residential VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As this is a work session, staff will not be making a recommendation at this time. Staff will provide a formal recommendation prior to the final review of the development review applications. VIII. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map 5 � � � Timber F�idge Apartments Lots 1•5, B/OCI( C, Lians Ridge Filing 9 (12&0 Morth Fro�7tage Road West) � , _� r ,, p Subject Propeity � Feet �h. _..,� . ,�..�,. „�_�,., .,. , .., �_..�r, �a �.� ��._..M., a.r;o �w-;�s�o�m�;, .r�rw; �' 0 150 300 600 �a� Mco�r�ya cec�nm�?, zoos !mau;a�.� � ! f ' �" Timber Ridge Redevelopment Project Description � Vail Timber Ridge, LLC, is proposing to redevelop the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Apartments development site and construct a new, five-story tall building extending approximately 800 feet in length along the North Frontage Road. I ,== -- - „ f r � i E ` T� �� : � � € " �� ` ; _�� B ! `�� I ' � R b } [ �� _ a .; � � 3'-� ,.�. � � , � � � �, -� � �}. � � �' �� 4 � , � �_ ..__ _. _ �_ , _.__ _ . , _ �� ,�� i : '' � � ��, �t� �� , ""� i� i: t s,; �. ��'L�f M I 1. `^ � :1^_ i f � � I' :9 „�'r €� ; ~ , K. � .�� , " �, , �.._�. ..�� -. * `�` � �_ �� , � B, , � � y� q` � � I � : . . � a�. � ` � � � ii �� . . � ; � .:; , .:� ; ,� , 3,'' � j�"`'� '' �� a � �"� , <} � �� ,w�� f�- .�- y � Y �� "�I . . _ �, � Z �J . I 'L� � 4 ��: 4�� . ��, �� 1,� �� —�.I �'� { {I� ��-'_�` I�-J� � � f ,'�. •I� .a� '' . �--- ' -- .- .�— . ` B1�15T B1-2fN)51H � . .. � ._.��?. � B}15T p1 asie� ..z,<; .'! __.. o:�a� UNIT PLANS A-300 The new building will contain 352 new affordable employee housing units capable of housing a minimum 570 employees. A combination of studio, one- bedroom, two- bedroom and three-bedroom units make up the mix of units on the site. Town of Vail Community Development December 30, 2009 �� , �.. -�------- � �� ; �� , �q'��r�� _ '- , ��, ��: � � �� ,�. �• � �, �- ? ��ef�',�(� �}�^�. ,� t�=� ,�1�'-U� 1,.��°1^ri'��i��;i,; �Lf-l.L' '.L�'Ll'.'� . __.._ _ � _ __ __� BUILDING FLOOR PLAN • SECOND LEUEL r- t _ _ , _____— - � ,-_.r,_r �� ! r : : �_,_. ,� j y � 't 7 ��, ;�"� a-. .�� ... �� .;r, �,.,. ,.y+�,.'� -_ �� ..,�� , ` �t�i''w� ��-�°�r L3 - � �xTk��'�iw9] `°i ��i.°`�'�� - �-�� a BUILDING FLOOR PLAN � FIRST LEVEL '° gLDG. PLANS =�— ' " A-401 ,� ;� - , v �^ 4�� r`�('i'� !�� i � * i ; ... � � f , i C ,_ �.� CIUBHOUSE SECOND ROOR PtAN _3,r € ...., f , S .n � r 3' -� - � � � r � 4 �. 2 f � �� "- zA .l �7 � � C o t I ��, ,� � {t� _' � � S� , I� � i �€ rl ,� _ -� �. �1 ,°� � � � � ,� ., , , : � , � � � .. � .. , �._� _�- , : � __. . �-- �-..;;,,._ CLUBHOUSE FlRST FLOOA P�M' -^—.• CLUBHOt1SE FLOOR PLANS A-801 A new five- level enclosed, parking garage containing 540 parking spaces will be constructed on the site along with improved and expanded public transit facilities to meet the transportation needs of the new residents. The proposed project also includes on- amenities such as a health and exercise room, clubhouse, outdoor public courtyards, in- unit laundry facilities, personal storage units and secure bicycle 5t01"ag8 rooms. Town of Vail Cammunity Development December 30, 2009 \ J � � . . � � The new building will have sloping roof forms with pitches of up to 7:12 and a mix of stone, stucco and cementious wood siding on the exterior. Additional design accents such as wooden shutters, exterior decks and exposed wood beams and bracing are included on the proposed building. � `� w--�" ��;� �Y� ...# a.�»ARTISANHARDIEBOARD „ y�•:� ;, SHINGlER00F � p'�� / WOOOBALLOM'OETAIL ��aTMa i ;� � � r�� 8 �, 1 �s `: y. ..t,� .,��'�} 3 ,.a .� � � . . �� , � :° , - ��i , � ;� m � � . " _1 _�-- ��-� '�� ,� �,�: �EO�� E�E�EEa �� .�� rr . . ` �� `''' �`�� W00� BRACNET AND FASQA DETAIL � �ECOrariv�w000H�noEa— w000aaFrEarna—J l�� VERTICPl HARDIE BOARD �! Town of Vail Community Development December 30, 2009 TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Applicant Vail Timber Ridge LLC 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive El Paso, Texas Project Architect Humphreys and Partners Architects 5339 Alpha Road Suite 300 Dallas, Texas Consulting Architect Victor Mark Donaldson Architects 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard # 207 Avon, Colorado Civil En i�neer Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, Colorado Land Plannin� Pylman & Associates, Inc. 137 Main Street, C107W Edwards, Colorado �J u � TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Summary of Request 1 2.0 Existing Conditions 1 2.1 Timber Ridge Histary 1 3.0 Proposed Plan 2 3.1 Project Description 2 3.2 Utilities 3 3.3 Detailed Zoning Analysis 3 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation 7 5.0 Summary 11 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 3 � 1.0 Introduction l.l Summary of Request The purpose of this application is to provide information relative to a request for Development Plan approval for the proposed re-development of 5.24 acres of the existing Timber Ridge apartments. Timber Ridge is located at 1280 North Frontage Road. The legal description for the property is Lots 1 thorough 5, a resubdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C, Town of Vail, C0. The Town of Vail Zoning map designates Timber Ridge as Housing District (H). Development within the Housing District must receive Development Plan approval in accordance with the parameters and review criteria described in Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code. This application contains the infarmation required by Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code to review and approve this application. 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 The history of Timber Ridge Timber Ridge was constructed in 1981 and remains the largest employee housing complex in the Town of Vail. The ten-acre site includes 198 two bedroom, one bath rental units in 16 buildings. Each unit is 745 square feet in size. The Town of Vail purchased Timber Ridge for $20 million in July of 2003. In 2005 the town issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a redevelopment of the property. Corum Real Estate Group was selected through this RFP process but mutually acceptable terms were not successfully negotiated. In July of 2007, anticipating a redevelopment of the property, the Town rezoned Timber Ridge to the Housing (H) District. In 2007 the town received an unsolicited redevelopment proposal from Open/Hillwood that was related to ongoing negotiations regarding redevelopment of the Lionshead Parking Structure. The discussions regarding Timber Ridge were terminated in March 2008. In December of 2008 the Town issued a new Request for Proposals seeking interested and qualified development teams to redevelop approximately one half of the property. This process led to the selection of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � team. A development agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Timber Ridge LLC was entered into in October of 2009. The development agreement stipulates a redevelopment of the eastern half of the ten acre site and requires Vail Timber Ridge LLC to deliver 359 EHU's capable of housing a total of 570 beds. 3.0 Proposed Plan 3.1 Project Description The Vail Timber Ridge LLC team has a tremendous amount of residential housing construction experience. The members of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC team have been involved in the construction of over 70,000 units of residential, student and military family housing across the country. The VTR LLC team has taken the town's goals of creating a significant employee housing project on the Timber Ridge site to heart and have worked diligently to meet the town's density goals while designing a very livable and attractive building. The proposed design for Timber Ridge includes 352 apartments, 540 parking spaces and a 4,689 square foot resident's clubhouse. The building form is defined by the long rectangular shape of the site and is centered on the five story 522 space-parking garage. The garage entrance is approximately mid-point of the proposed building and the garage footprint is a relatively efficient 120' x 267' layout. The ground level of the garage will include trash facilities, bike storage, a mailroom and a large area of individual storage units. Each successive level of the garage will include trash disposal facilities and bicycle starage. The ground level and next three levels of parking are fully enclosed. The garage ramps up to an open air Sth level of parking. The 352 apartments are arranged in three separate but connected buildings. The separation of the buildings allows a complete wrap of three sides of the parking garage and also allows the buildings to step with the vertical grade changes of the site. The east building is a double loaded corridor courtyard design. The building ranges from three to five story elements as it wraps around the courtyards and extends on an east-west axis to abut the parking garage. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan ,� The center building consists of a five story element of apartments running along the 270 feet of the front fa�ade of the garage. The rooflines and roof pitch of these units varies to create a townhouse type of appearance to this front elevation. An enclosed hallway between the parking garage and the units provides access to each apartment on each level. u The west building is a similar courtyard double loaded design as the east building. Extending from the garage the building continues on an east west axis with two prominent courtyards in a five story form. While the site constraints and building program shape the overall building form, great care has been to introduce horizontal and vertical design elements that break down the building mass and scale and provide visual interest. A variety of rooflines and roof pitches, varied window placements and a variety of materials all add to the overall design concept. 3.2 Utilities Water and sanitary sewer mains are located adjacent to or on the site and appear to be adequate to serve the proposed buildings. Alpine Engineering, Inc. is the project civil engineer and will work closely with town staff and the utility service providers to ensure appropriate utility connections are designed and implemented. Natural gas, electric, television and telephone services are all available at the site. 3.3 Detailed Zoning Analysis The Housing District is intended primarily to provide for employee housing development opportunities. Due to the nature and varying characteristics of employee housing a housing oriented zone district was specifically developed and adopted into the Vail Land Use Code. The stated intent of the Housing District is to ensure that employee housing is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air and open spaces. A. Permitted Uses The only use proposed by the application is Employee Housing Units, which is a Permitted Use in this zone district. The other uses on site, parking and a 4,689 square foot clubhouse are support uses to the primary permitted use. The clubhouse will serve residents of the Timber Ridge complex and will not be open to outside memberships. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan B. Conditional Uses There are no conditional uses proposed by this application. C. Setbacks The required setback is the Housing District is twenty feet (20') from the perimeter of the zone district. The proposed plan meets and exceeds this setback requirement. D. Site Coverage The Housing District allows for maximum site coverage of fifty-five percent (55%) of the total site area. At the discretion of the Planning Commission this site coverage maximum may be increased if seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking spaces are underground or enclosed. Although the proposed Timber Ridge development plan meets this parking goa1, there is no request to increase the maximum allowable site coverage. The site coverage of the proposed plan is 94,100 square feet, which measures to forty one percent (41 %) of the 5.24-acre site. E. Landscaping and Site Development The Housing District requires at least thirty percent (30%) of the total site area to be landscaped. The proposed plan includes a landscape area measured at 72,372 square feet, which equals thirty one percent (31 %) of the site area. F. Parking and Loading The Housing District, in recognition of the unique nature and characteristics of employee housing, allows for, at the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, a reduction in the parking requirements outlined in Chapter 10 of the Vail Land Use Code. This reduction is based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than required by Town Code. The applicant fully understands that Timber Ridge must be a fully functional project and that the parking must work for the residents. The design of the project includes a parking count that the applicant believes will more than adequately � meet the needs of the residents. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan The design of the parking at Timber Ridge, with 540 total parking spaces provided, 522 of these within the parking garage, allows for efficient management of access control. All cars will be registered with the management company and provided with an authorization sticker. Garage access will be controlled by a key card or similar control system. This will ensure that parking is made available for residents and will eliminate "poaching" of parking by outside users. The parking standards of the Town Code are, by nature, a generalist set of standards. Within the Village and LionsHead core areas parking is set at 1.4 spaces per residential unit. All areas of town outside of these core areas fall under Parking Schedule B. The parking requirement under Parking Schedule B for multiple family units is 1.5 spaces per each unit under 500 square feet and 2 spaces per unit for units between 500 and 2000 square feet. This standard is applied across the board, regardless of whether the units are in a triplex or in a 150 unit complex, is irrespective of location, proximity to transit or walkability to community services, and applies to units that may be seasonally occupied, used as full-time residences, used as vacation rentals or as second homes. The Housing Zone District was written in a manner that understands that these generalist standards may not be particularly applicable and allows for variations in these standards. As this is a site that is designed for local warker rental housing we can assume that most tenants will work within the Town of Vail geographic footprint. And it should be fair to assume that some tenants will be seasonal, some annual and some may live there for longer. But we can also assume that it is unlikely that a tenant will live there for the long term. It is unlikely that a child will enter pre- school and graduate from high school while living at Timber Ridge. Tenants on a short term basis (even a few years) may have little need for multiple car ownership. Timber Ridge is located within 9/10 of a mile from a grocery store, a hardware store, a sporting goods store, other retail shops, restaurants and bars. Timber Ridge is also located within 8/10 of a mile from the Lions Head I-70 Overpass, which provides access to all of Lions Head. These distances are well within comfortable walking distance for a fit and active population. Timber Ridge is a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). There is an existing bus stop at Timber Ridge and the proposed design includes an improved bus stop area that will allow for additional buses to serve Timber Ridge. The Town of Vail and ECO Transit bus systems both serve Timber Ridge. Timber Ridge residents can easily access any and all services within the Town of Vail, (social, medical, educational, government, employment, shopping, recreation) and via the ECO Transit system may utilize transit to visit down valley locations. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan , A key tenet of Transit Oriented Development is high density and a reduction in parking demand. Walkability and TOD are considered key factors to sustainable development. A speaker at a recent Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute land use/sustainability conference stated " In Europe land use and transportation planning strives to house and transport people. In America we strive to house people and their cars and strive to transport their cars." Timber Ridge is an example of a project that by virtue of its location, its target resident demographic and the high quality Town of Vail transit system, can fully function with a reduced parking standard. If we are to create sustainable, transit oriented development we must, as a society, discourage automobile use and encourage and enable walkability and transit opportunities. This is not inconsistent with recent Town of Vail policies to encourage local residents to use alternatives to peak season parking use of the Village and LionsHead Parking Structures. Town of Vail bus ridership has been experiencing significant growth, perhaps as a result of these parking policies. The parking requirement for Timber Ridge is detailed in Parking Schedule B of the Vail Town Code. Parking Schedule B requires 1.5 parking spaces for residential units of less than 500 square feet and 2 parking spaces for units between 500 and 2,000 square feet in size. The parking requirements for the 352 units are as follows: 22 units (less than 500 square feet) x 1.5 spaces per unit = 33 spaces. 330 units (between 500 — 2,000 square feet) x 2 spaces per unit = 660 spaces This totals a parking requirement of 693 spaces. The proposed plan includes 522 parking spaces in the garage and 18 surface spaces for a total of 540 spaces. . This equates to an average of 1.53 parking spaces per unit. The applicant is requesting a reduction in the parking standards of approximately 22%. G. Other Development Standards In the Housing District the development standards of lot area and site dimensions, building height and density control shall be as proposed by the applicant, as prescribed by the planning environmental commission. A. Lot area and site dimensions This application proposes redevelopment of a part of Lot 2 and all of Lot 3, 4 and 5, a subdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C. This entails 5.24 acres of the approximately 10-acre Timber Ridge site. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan The site is 885 feet in length along the North Frontage Road and is 233 feet deep at its east end and approximately 300 feet deep at the western boundary. A lot line adjustment to Lot 2 will be completed prior to construction on the site. B. Building Height The proposed building includes 3,4 and 5 story elements and steps vertically with the side grade on both the east-west and north-south axes. The highest ridgeline measures at 76 feet, 9.5 inches above grade with several architectural projections extending above this height. The rear five story element measures at 70 feet, 10.5 inches above grade. C. Density Control In October of 2009 Timber Ridge LLC and the Town of Vail entered into a development agreement that outlines the parameters of the proposed redevelopment of the 5.24-acre portion of Timber Ridge. This agreement stipulates a density of 359 Employee Housing Units capable of housing 570 beds. Minor changes in building massing and height have resulted in a minor density reduction to this number. The density proposed by this application is 352 Employee Housing Units. 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation The Housing District describes six criteria that shall be used by the staff and planning and environmental commission as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. Those criteria and the applicant's response to each follows below: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. Applicant's response: The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is located between the North Frontage Road and Lion's Ridge Loop in West Vail, with all site access via North Frontage Road. This stretch of the North Frontage Road is, in general, 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan � home to the largest concentration of large buildings in the West Vail region. East of Timber Ridge is the relatively large Vail Run and Simba Run buildings. Immediately west of these buildings, adjacent to the east boundary of the proposed redevelopment parcel is the smaller scale Savoy Villas. West of Timber Ridge is the US Post Office facility, the site of the recently approved Roost Lodge redevelopment and the large scale Vail Commons, City Market, Safeway and West Vail Mall Buildings. Timber Ridge has several attributes that make the site appropriate for high-density housing. Direct access off the North Frontage Road removes any traffic impact from secondary streets and smaller scale residential neighborhoods. This same attribute allows for extremely efficient and high intensity transit service. The site is centrally located to allow reasonable walking distance to both Lionshead and the West Vail commercial district. The hillside behind Lions Ridge Loop is too steep to allow development so there are no immediate neighbors to the north and no view impacts to any other residential properties. Savoy Villas, located just east of Timber Ridge is oriented toward views to the south, over I-70 and to the southeast towards Vail Mountain. Timber Ridge is one of the very few sites in town available for high- density employee housing that can take advantage of these attributes. The building architecture has been carefully designed to reflect the characteristics of the general historic and current trends of mountain design. In addition the building incorporates multiple design elements that mitigate the mass and length of the building. The courtyard design allows for significant interplay of the horizontal elevation of the street frontage while completely eliminating the visual impact of a 522 car parking garage. The varied building heights of the courtyard elements and the varied aspect, pitch and style of roof elements create the appearance of smaller building forms. Timber Ridge LLC believes the proposed design is an appropriate and positive expression of the desired density is fully compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighbarhood. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �: B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. .. The proposed Timber Ridge plan provides buildings and improvements that have been specifically designed to produce a functional development plan. The significant amount of required parking has been hidden from public view yet is a functional and convenient facility for the residents. Unit access and pedestrian circulation is primarily within the enclosed building. Unit floar plans are efficient and livable. Laundry facilities are included within each unit. A nearly 5,000 square foot clubhouse provides a very functional and attractive amenity for the residents. The site itself, as discussed elsewhere in this application, may be the best available high density residential employee housing opportunity in the Town of Vail. Frontage Road and transit stop improvements are responsive to the site and the neighborhood. The building massing on the east end is meant to be responsive to the only residential neighbor. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is currently home to 198 two-bedroom apartment units in 16 buildings, with extensive surface parking and site retaining walls. The proposed redevelopment site of 5.24 acres includes 106 of those existing units. The existing development has already impacted the original natural features of this site. The proposed plan does maximize opportunities for access and use by the resident public by the design of the courtyard spaces. The courtyard design performs the dual function of providing a significant break in the front fa�ade of the building and also, in response to this criterion, provides a location for functional and aesthetic public spaces. The courtyards have varied landscape design themes that include a plaza for intimate public gathering spots, barbecue and fire pit areas and outdoor spas. The work session format with the planning and environmental commission, along with staff input, has resulted in revisions to the project that are extremely beneficial to the landscape design. 20] 0 Timber Ridge Development Plan �, Previous plans included a 24-foot wide driveway with parallel parking spaces all along the front of the building. This resulted in a significant width of asphalt and a difficult landscape design problem. The current plans have reduced this large expanse of asphalt to a 20 foot wide combined bike path and emergency vehicle access lane. This change in vehicular circulation had opened up more area available for landscape planting and results in a much improved landscape design. The grading at the north elevation of the building has also been revised. The back wall of the parking garage will now serve as part of the retaining wall system. This allows the entire back wall of the parking garage to be filled to the road grade. A level landscape area now exists between the garage and Lion's Ridge Loop and significant landscape planting has been incorporated into the plans. This eliminates the unsightly rear wall of the garage and creates a 270 foot long landscape island that will serve to visually separate the east and west wings of the building. Overall the landscape design represents a tremendous improvement over existing conditions and provides a very functional and meaningful open space and landscape design. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. Timber Ridge is located along the North Frontage Road and the town bicycle and pedestrian path has been designed to pass through the site on Timber Ridge property. The bike path through the site is designed as a 20-foot wide path that will also serve as an emergency vehicle access. Sidewalks along the building provide access to all entryways and connect to the bike path and to the adjacent bus stop. Vehicular access and circulation is direct and efficient. The North Frontage Road will be improved with acceleration and deceleration turn lanes at the primary vehicular access to the parking garage. Cars will enter the site and directly access the centrally located parking garage. A second vehicular access is shared with the bus stop and provides access to the remainder of the existing Timber Ridge units and to 18 surface parking spaces that will serve short term, business office and drop off needs. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been � identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 10 �,,, waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. A full environmental impact report has been completed for the proposed project and evaluated as a part of the design process. The recommend mitigation measures include improvements to the North Frontage Road to allow for appropriate turning movements and several alternative rockfall mitigation options. The applicant and the Town of Vail will work together towards the final design and implementation of these mitigation measures. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other application plans. The Timber Ridge site has been the largest employee-housing complex in Vail since its construction in 1981. The Vail Comprehensive Plan and all of the other applicable long range planning documents and guiding documents recognize this land use as appropriate in this location. A necessary criterion for the 2007 re-zoning of the property to the Housing District was compliance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan and all other applicable plans. This positive re-zoning action serves as affirmation that the proposed land use is in compliance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan. This application for redevelopment of approximately half of the existing Timber Ridge complex does not represent a change in land use, but is a change in the physical arrangement and intensity of that existing land use. As such, this application remains in full compliance with all applicable Town of Vail comprehensive planning documents. 5.0 Summary The Town of Vail has determined, through the 2008 Employee Housing Strategic Plan, that the policy of the Town of Vail will be "To ensure there is deed restricted housing for at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of VaiL This goal will be met by policies and actions that (1) ensure new development keeps up with this goal , and (2) development projects sponsored by or in partnership with the Town to "catch up" to meet this 30% goal. The Town has initiated several actions. The buy down program has added five units and the Arosa Drive duplex will provide a great ownership opportunity to two local families. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 11 . But to really make progress in the "catch up" arena a development of significant density is necessary. The Timber Ridge site has the physical and locational attributes to allow for this site to be the best opportunity for the Town of Vail to create a significant increase in deed restricted beds within the community. Vail Timber Ridge LLC believes that we have addressed the program request of the Vail Town Council with a building and site design that is appropriate to the location and the neighborhood and meets all of the criteria required for Housing District Development Plan approval. This proposed redevelopment of a portion of Timber Ridge will provide a tremendous community benefit. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 12 � � � ,� ��i'�%��..�.l-�-�.�''�.t{..,�a�t c��r��.�l�� Ja�ivary 28, 2010 � �a �t+..7rt''ri I a . i;}k E �z ,�t=:t'°1°_r��d•:al: ��'- ' �� si: f� it< <� I,�}. ; � i !1 �-i � 1 E �. l ,. ;t it;d:� > ;' � �SL� � [t��.u...')�x ��.. :`-.5�,�., i�,.t\. �J��iv..'.1 il ,`;-`t�'-t C;i � ?�' �}�-•.:.c +f EZt,,t:',±.'tji�'1.E7.,C:�.5E21 Town af Vail �� , C��,�� . CON,.� Attn: George Ruther 7S South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 ( Truthex- �i�vail�;o�r.co�11) Job Na. 109 310G Subject: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineeri:ng Sei•vices for Selection c>f Rockfall Mitigatian Fence Alternative, Proposed Vail Timber Ridge Redevelopinent, 1280 North Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Ruther: We are pleased to submit this pi•oposal to provide geotechnical engineerinb services foi- seleetion ofthe rockfall mitigation alternative at th� subject site. The proposal is based o7a meeting with you and Rick Pylman at the project sit� on January 2fi, 2010 and out• geologic site assessment report dated December 17, 2009, Job No. 109 310B. Project Data and Scope of Services: I'our alternatives were presented. in general, they will provide equivaleut protection at the respective probability 1eve1(90% or 98%) as presented in Tables 1 through 4. We understand that you are requesting assistance in determining the preferred mitigation alternative. The MSE wall alternative has been eliminated. We will assist with techizieal and cost estimate issues in the selection matrix. Meeting with staff and Town Cauncil will probabty be needed. We understand that our• previous �eologic study has bcen provided to you by Vail Timber .Ridge, LLC and will be used in our services for you. ?.iw� ,��n` Z Cost: The cost to perfoc-m our serviccs will depend on the required effbrt and will be based �n the unit costs and ather costs presenteci in the attaehed Fee Schedule. For budgcting purposes, the following units are assumed: Project Manager: 14 hours � $1301hr $1,820 Sr. Geologist: G hours @$130/}u- 780 Meetings: 8 haurs @ $130/hr I,Q40 Administrative: 2 hours �� $ 55/hr 110 Total: $3,750 Additional scope of ser��ices witl be perfonned based on the unit chaz•ges and Terms and Canditions of the attached Fee Scheduie. � �11'��"t."F` . �'�}_i � �� ..,c)��1"tle.la,1 �t>T"1,1?',„ti j"��r�)"�.1'_�?�?.:' � °`?9�\"i:I"i�li'['':lt. t)r't'.;.��lt`S.•�t)�"?�i � >�� ' Tawn of Vail January 28, 2010 Page 2 Terms and Conditions: On the reverse side ofthe Fee Schedule are our normal terms and coYiditions for perfonning professional services. Please note there is a limitation of liabilit�' clausc included. Aceeptance: If this proposal mects with your approval, please sign a copy and retui7� it to us. If you have any questions, please c�ntact the undersigned. Additional Services: We are available to provided additional geotechnical, geologic hazard, construction observation mater�i�I testing (CMT) and environmental services such as Phase I and II ESA, on-site waste treatment system, wetlands delineation and segmental retaining wall design. Please contact us for additianal details. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal. We are looking forward to working with you. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. � C��, ,,� ",�. `_"�� Steven L. Pawlak P.E. .,. S LPlks�v cc: Pylman and Associates — Attn: Rick Pylman (rick ci%�lyn�an.cc�n�) Accepted this date: rt?��tl�/ 3 ZO�C� bY� �'fc_=ORG��: �c1i'%1��2_�__�1�TbR ot' �� S igned { � �� Job No. la9 31oc ---- c.�ec�t@Cf"1 u H� � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNiCAL 201.0 FEE SCHEDULE GLENWOOD SPRINGS PROFESSI�NAL SERVICES FIELD EXPLORATION Tzuck-monnted drill rig Langyear BK-51HD ox CME-45B .... CME-55 ............................................. H�PWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Coforado 89609 Phone: 974-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 e-mail: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com ...................................... ...................................... Mobilization.................................................................................. ...........................$150/hour ...........................$ I 65/hour .......................... $4.00/mile AIl-terrain drill rig .......................................................................................................... Cost + 20% Crewtravel ...................................................................................................................$75/man/hour Special equipment (backhoe, drill bits, well supplies, etc.) ............................................ Cost + 20% Field Engineer or Technician .............................................................................................. $75/hour Overtime {over $ hours/day, Saturday, Sunday and Holidays) .........................1.5 x houzly rate LA.BORATORY TESTING Fee schedule available on request. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION ANl) MATERIALS TESTING Fee schedule available on request. ENGTNEERING (Includes projec# planning, administration, analysis, consultatian, report prepazation, field and travel time. Expert witness servitce has a 50% premium hourly rate.) Principai............................................................................................................................ $180/hour ProjectManager ................................................................................................................ $130/hour SeniorProjectEngineer/Geologist .................................................................................... $110/hour ProjectEngineer/Geologist ............................................................................................... $100/hour StaffEngineer/Geologist ..................................................................................................... $90/hour CAD/Drafting ..................................................................................................................... $75/hour WordProcessing ................................................................................................................. $55/hour OTHER DIRECT CHARGES Auto or pickup mileage .............................................................. Out of tavcm living expenses, equipment rental, supplies, etc. .... ........................... � ..... $.70/mile .. Cost + 20% REMARKS Late fee of $30.00 or 1,S% per month (whichever is #he greater) charged 30 days from invoice date plus colIection costs, bank charges and reasonable attorney's fees. Up to 3 copies of report provided foz each project. Minimum 2 hour trip charge per day for field engineer or technician. Termv and Conditioas on Back Effectivc January 1, 2010 TERMS AND CONDITTONS STANDART7 OF CARE: Services performed by HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTEGHNICAL, INC. (also referred to as I�P GEOTECI-n under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing ander similar conditions in the same locale. No wamanty, express or implied, is made or intended by the proposal for consulting services or by furnishing oral or written reports of the findings made. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the location where borings, tests or explorations are made by I3P GEOTECH and that the data, interpretations and recommendations of HP GEOTECH are based solely upon the data available to HP GEOTECH. HP GEOTECH will be responsible for those daEa, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretations by others of the informarion developed. LTMITAT'ION OF LIABTT.ITY: The client agrees to limit the liability of HP GBOTECTi and its employees, directors, officers and subconsultants (collectively "HP GEOTECH") to the client, arising from or in any way related to the Project, theAgreement or the services performed, such that the total aggregate liability ofHP GEOTECH to the client shall not exceed the greater of $50,000 or HP GEOTECH's total fee received for the services rendered on this Projec� Client hereby releases HP GEOTECH from any IiabiIity above such amount. This limitation of iiability shall apply to any and all claims for relief made or which could be made. CORPORATE PitOT'ECTION: Client agees its sole and exclusive remedy, i£ any, for any claim arising out of the services of HP GEOTECH shall be against HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. and not against any individual employees, officets, awners or directors of HEPWORTH-PAWT.AK GEOTBCHIVICAL, INC. SITE ACCESS: Unless ottierwise agreed, the client will furnish HP GEOTECH with right-of-access to the site in order to conduct the planned exploration. While HP GEOTBCH wiIl take reasonable precautions to limit damage to the properly, it is understood by the client that in the normal course of services some damage may occur, the restoration of which is not part of this Agreement and shall not be the obligation of HP GEOTECH. Unless otherwise agreed, the client will secure all necessary approvals, permits, lieenses and consents necessary Yo the perfonnance of the services hereunder. UTILITTES: In the performance of its services, HP GEOTECH will take reasonable precautions to avoid damage or injury to subterraneaa stcuctures or utiliries. The client agrees to hold IiP GEOT'ECH har►riless and indemnify HP GEOTECH for any claims, payments or other liability, including attorney's fees and costs, incurred by HP GEOTECH for any damages to subterranean struchues or utilities which are not called to HP GEOTECH's attention and correctly shown on the plans fumished to I-IP GEOTECH. [JNAI�ITTCIPATED HAZARDOUS MATERIAI.S: Tt shall be the duty of the owner, the client, or their representative to advise HP GEOTECI�T of any known or suspected hazardous substances which may exist on or near any premises upon which services are to be pedormed by HP GEOTECH's employees, agents or subcontractors. IfHP GEOTECH observes or suspects the existence of ananticigated hazardous materials during tha course of providing services, HP GEO'FECH may at its option terminate further services on the project and notify client of the condition. Services will be resumed only after a renegotiation of scope of services and fees. In the event that such renegotiation cannot occur to the sadsfaction of HP GEOTECA, HI' G80TECFI may at its option terminate this contract MOLD or OTHER $IOLOGICAL CONTqMIATANTS (MOBG7: FIP GBOT�CH's services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of MOBC developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professionai in this special field of practice should be consulted. INVOICES: HP GBOTECH will submit invoices to the client monthly and a final bill upon completion of services. Unless otherwise noted, fees will be based on the prevailing Fee Schedule in efY'ect when the services aze perfornted. Payment is due upon presentation of invoice and is past due thirty (30) days from the invoice date. Client agrees io pay a late fee of $30.00 or one and one half percent (1 �/z%} per month (whichever is the greater} on past due accounts including all costs of a collection agency. Client also agrees to pay, in addition to judgement or settlement sums due, all costs and expenses including court costs, reasonable attomey`s Fees aad staff time computed according to HP GEOTECH's prevailing Fee Schedole incurred by HP GEOT'ECH relating to collection procedures on overdue accounts. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All reports, plans, specifications, computer files, field data, notes and other documents and instruments prepared by i�P GEOTECH as instruments of service shall remain tlie property of T�P GEOTECH. HP GEOTECH shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, inctuding ihe copyright thereto. SAMPLES; HP GEOTECH will retain all soil and rock samples that are transported to HP GBOTECH's laboratories until submission of the project report. Further storage or transfer of samples can be made at client's expense upon written request DISPUTE RESOLUTION: All claims and disputes between HP GEOTECH and alient arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement will be submitted to mediadon before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law VENUB: If a dispute at law arises related to the services provided under this Agreement then the claim will be brought and tried in a Court of competent jurisdiction in the county where HP GEOTECH's principal place of business is located. ND THIRD PARTY BENEFICTARIES: Nothing contained in this agreement shall create a eontractual relationship with or a cause ofaction in favor of any third party against either NP GEOTECH or client. TERMINATION: In the event of terminarion of the Agreement by either party, the client shall within fifteen (15) calendar days of ternunation pay HP GBOTECH for all services rendered and all reimbursable costs incurred by HP GEOTECH up to date of terniination, in accordance with the payment provisions of this Agreement. HP GEOTECH shall have uo liability to the client and the client agrees to make no ciaiin for any delay or damage as a result of such terminarion caused by any breach of this Agreement by the client. Effective January 1, 2010 2009 \ 1 � ' ment mber Rid e redevelo Ti , p . . op en house tomorro w in �/ail Town preparing for rework of $20 mi l l ion property Preliminary redevelopment plans for Vail's Timber Ridge employee housing complex will be presented during an open house from 5 to 6:30 pm. tomorrow, Dec. 30 in the Vail Town Council Chambers. Full and part-time residents, business owners and potential tenants are encouraged to attend the session. The town has been working with a development team to build 352 employee housing units on the eastern half of the town-owned property. The town paid about $20 million far the property in 2007. The developer, Vail Timber Ridge, LLC, of El Paso, Texas, was selected earlier in the year by the Town Council from among 10 submissions following a re- quest for proposal/qualification process. Since then, preliminary designs have been developed and are being shown to the town's development review boards and the public prior to submission of a complete develop- ment application for the five-acre site. The open house, sponsored by the town's Community Development Department, wili be used to collect pub- lic comments on topics ranging from bulk, mass and scale of the project to archifectural design and charae- ter. Participants will include Community Development Director George Ruther and Rick Pylman of Pylman & Associates, Inc., who is serving as the land planning consultant to the developer. Input gained from the open house wili be used by the developer's design team to aid in preparing the development review application submittal to the town. The developer is known in the construction industry for building more than 70,000 residential units across the country, including off-campus student housing near Texas A&M in College Station, Texas. A pre- development agreement between the developer and the Vail Town Council calls for a one-time payment of $11 million to the town. A long-term ground lease would be used to enable the town to retain ownership � The town of Vail is preparing to redevelop the Tim- ber Ridge employee housing complex. An open house on the redevelopment effort is scheduled for tomorrow. Avery Cunliffe phota of the property. In addition to the open house, upcoming develop- ment review meetings will include opportunities for public comment with sessions held in the Town Coun- cil Chambers as follows: Jan. 11, 1 p.m., work session with the Planning & Environmental Commission - Jan. 19, TBD, update to the Vail Town Council Feb. 8, 1 pm., final review with the Planning & En- vironmental Commission Feb. 17, 3 pm., final review with the Design Review Board March 2, TBD, update to the Vail Town Council Constructed in 1981, Timber Ridge is Vail's largest employee �iousing complex, consisting of 198 rental units on just over ten acres. The town acquired the property in 2003 for $20 million to preserve the prop- e�ty's deed restricted employee housing designation. For more information, contact Community Develop- ment Director George Ruther at 479-2145. � Vail Timber Ridge Life Safety Report LIFE SAFETY REPORT FOR VAIL TIMBER RIDGE HPA Project Number 2009024 Town of Vail, Colorado March 3, 2010 Page 1 � r�c��oM� MAR 112010 - ��Wi� ��' VAIL Prepared by: Deborah Shaner, P.E., Fire Protection Engineer, Shaner Life Safety Introduction: This report outlines the fire and life safety strategy for the Timber Ridge Apartment Complex in Vail, Colorado. It is intended to be read along with the code analysis provided by Humphreys and Partners, the project Architect. The primary objective of this report is to outline the fire protection, fire alarm and life safety systems and features to be provided at the Timber Ridge complex. The overall goal is to provide a high level of life safety for Timber Ridge residents, facilitate an effective fire fighter operation, meet applicable codes and standards and provide an economical, effective approach to life safety. � In addition to this report, fire protection plans have been prepared by the project Fire Protection Engineer, Deborah Shaner PE of Shaner Life Safety. These plans are included in the Construction Documents and are intended to represent the design intent for the fire protection and fire alarm systems. Additional fire protection features are represented in the drawing packages prepared by other disciplines, specifically civil and architectural. Brief Description of the Building: The project consists of a 5 story wood framed apartment building and a 5 level enclosed parking garage. Refer to the code analysis for construction types and occupancy ratings. For construction purposes, the building is divided into four sections, three residential and one parking. These sections are separated by a three hour fire barrier wall and will serve to define the fire alarm and fire protection zones, to be discussed later in this report. The Parking Garage is not heated. The project includes 352 dwelling units, a clubhouse and leasing facility, resident storage and general support areas (such as mechanical, electrical, trash and telephone rooms). The building will be provided with a dedicated Fire Alarm Panel room and will also have a Riser room for both Fire Protection and Domestic water entries. � 0 Vail Timber Ridge Life Safety Report Appticable Codes and Standards: March 3, 2010 Page 2 The Timber Ridge project will be designed and construction in accordance with the code and standards adopted in the Town of Vail. These documents include: • 2009 International Building Code, including Appendix Chapters B, C, E, G, J, K. • 2009 International Fire Code, including Appendix Chapters B, C, D, E, G, H, I and J. • 2009 International Mechanical Code, including Appendix A. • 2009 International Plumbing Code • 2009 International Fuel Gas Code • 2009 International Energy Conservation Code • 2008 National Electrical Code • 2007 NFPA 13, Installation of Sprinkler Systems 2007 NFPA 14, Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems • 2007 NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code • 2008 NEC, National Electrical Code • Vail Fire & Emergency Services Standards Building Access: Vail Timber Ridge has limited access due to its mountainside location. There will be fire truck access on the south side of the project, adjacent to the I-70 Frontage Road. Refer to the Civil Drawings site plan for the configuration of the fire lane. To facilitate Fire Department response, various annunciators and fire department connections will be provided. The Fire Protection plans show these locations. In addition, there will be one main Fire Panel room which will contain the Fire Alarm Control panel and associated equipment, as well as a graphic map outlining the building, its zones and all fire alarm devices. Refer to the Fire Alarm section of this report for additional annunciation information. Fire hydrants will be provided as shown on the Civil Drawings. There are six stairwells on the South side of the building available for fire fighter access into the building. Summary of Provide Fire Protection System and Life Safety Features: The following features and systems will be provided. Refer to specific report sections for more detailed information. • Fire protection sprinkler system throughout • Fire protection standpipes � Vail Timber Ridge Life Safety Report March 3, 2010 Page 3 • Fire alarm and detection system throughout • Compliant occupant egress — Refer to Code Analysis and Architectural Drawings for Egress information • Emergency lighting/egress illumination • Exit signs • Fire extinguishers Fire Protection System: The building will be protected throughout with a fire protection system installed in accordance with NFPA 13. The three residential building sections will have a standard, wet pipe sprinkler system. Each of the 3 sections will represent a zone and will be provided with a zone valve per floor (3 per floor total). The sprinkler zone limitations set forth by NFPA 13 will not be exceeded in any single zone, thus requiring a single riser per building section. Refer to the Fire Protection drawings for locations of risers and a diagram of the system zoning. The garage will be provided with a standard dry pipe system, in accordance with NFPA 13. A single garage riser will be provided with a control valve per floor. These valves will be located in the Riser Room located near the Main Entrance of the building. The Riser Room, located near the Main Entrance, will house both the fire protection and domestic fire entries. A fire pump is not necessary based on an analysis of the available water supply. The Riser Room will house a backflow preventer, a Main Waterflow and Tamper switch and a separate control valve for each building section (total of 4). Three wet pipe risers will initiate here and will be run separately to each of the three residential building sections. A fourth riser will serve the garage and will be outfitted with a dry pipe valve, air compressor and other accessories as required for a dry pipe system by NFPA 13. The residential sections of the building (3 zones total) will each have a dedicated sprinkler riser, located in a pipe chase, with a marked cabinet on each floor housing the floor control valves, complete with water flow and tamper switch. This will allow for floor control per building section. The fire protection system will be annunciated as both floor level and building section (precise nomenclature to be determined —1,2,3 or East, West Center are possibilities). Refer to the Fire Protection Drawings for precise locations of these control valves. The fire protection system will be monitored by the fire alarm system and will annunciate the sprinkler alarms and tamper switches by floor and zone. Fire sprinklers will be provided throughout the building and will likely be standard, recessed type. �J Vail Timber Ridge Life Safety Report March 3, 2010 Page 4 Fire department connections to the fire protection sprinkler systems will be provided on the South side of the building as shown on the Civil and Fire Protection drawings. The FDCs will be clearly labeled. The Fire Protection Contractor will provide shop drawings and equipment data submittals as part of the application for a Fire Protection permit. The interstitial spaces between the floor and ceiling will likely be filled with insulation and are not planned to provide with fire sprinklers. The Construction Documents are requesting an alternate for sprinkler coverage; however, this option is the least desirable. The fire protection system will be supplied by city water, which is adequate for this project. A flow test was conducted on November 20, 2009. The results of the flow test, plus an analysis of required fire flow is attached. Standpipes: Class I, manual, wet standpipes will be provided in all stairwells of the building's residential areas. Refer to the Fire Protection drawings for locations. Of course, all travel distance requirements will be accommodated. The standpipes will provide 2-1/2" hose valves in each stairwell for Fire Department use only. The Garage will be outfitted with a dry standpipe, to be activated by a key switch located in the FACP room near the main entry. This key switch, to be operated by the Fire Department only, will fill the Garage standpipes with water by releasing a solenoid valve. Fire department connections for the standpipes will be provided on the South side of the building as shown on the Civil and Fire Protection drawings. These will be adjacent to the sprinkler system FDCs and will be clearly labeled. Temporary standpipes will be provided. The Fire Protection Contractor will submit required documentation when available. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A complete fire alarm and detection system will be provided throughout. The system features and functions include: • Addressable fire alarm control panel • Manual pull stations at all exits • Addressable smoke and heat detectors throughout • Smoke detectors at FACP, in Elevator Lobbies, in the Elevator Equipment Room and in the Elevator Shaft �■r Vail Timber Ridge Life Safety Report March 3, 2010 Page 5 • Heat detectors in the Elevator Equipment Room and Elevator Pit • Supervision of the building fire protection sprinkler system through waterflow and tamper switches • Occupant notification through horns and strobes • Duct detectors on fans over 2000 cfm • Elevator primary and secondary recall • Elevator shunt trip • Outside horn/strobe above fire department connections The building fire alarm system will be a single system and each point will be addressable. That said, the complex will be divided into four alarm zones, which will match the sprinkler zones. In addition, these zones align with the three hour fire barrier separations. There are three residential sections and one garage. An alarm in the Parking garage will activate a general alarm condition throughout the complex, alerting all building occupants. An alarm in a residential unit will activate a zoned evacuation, alerting occupants in that building section only, all floors. Refer to the Fire Protection Drawings for a fire alarm sequence of operations. All fire alarm wiring will be in conduit. There will be fire alarm annunciators placed at all stairwell entrances on the south side of the building. Fire Extinguishers: Fire extinguishers will be provided, commercial grade, type 10-BC. The fire extinguishers shall be mounted in cabinets, located so that the travel distance to a cabinet does not exceed 75'. Fire extinguishers shall be readily accessible. Summary: In conclusion, the Timber Ridge project will be constructed in accordance with all applicable codes and standards enforced by the Town of Vail. The design and construction team are committed to ensuring that adequate life safety is provided on this site and will work with Vail Fire & Emergency Services to develop effective fire fighting strategies and a compliant system design. � � ��111C}��lClt�l�t�l1 ��ir�� En�;. inc;. ��: ti�,k� ��4� �� t7 CC; �eb Shaner-L �l.F: StuaR Thompson, G�stte Fsre Sprinkl�rs; t�ee Thc�n�as. C� .torcian; Chad Paulson. SGM Eng; Andy Strehler, ERWSC� From: til�nsi ('<ilrt�cr t\EI, �I7t)-�??fi-3�373p1t.'�?U-�'fs-?��?t){fz�x} date: N�>� ?3. 2(I(?�? Re: I'in3t��r Fticlge l ire 1=Iti�� Ce,t (:)r� f ri�iav �:�,4�r�ibzr ?(), �t)t?i), ! l:i)t)az��, a l�'ire f=lou� te.yt c�a4 �.i�r�c3u�t<.�i at tla<r i istal?c�� Kii��;e �itr. 12esalt�: __ 1 E c�r �rist�? �priElkler 1lc�tic�, 1��4 thtt7� 250 �pn�, it iti tc�;�,irxti�c�nci��i tl�at the rr�idu.�l prc�tiurl° ��,c�ci ti�r a3csit n k>�� ai 1c.�5i .?f) p,i b�:lstw tli�: re�tciu<tl �re>,urc Ji<�Itl rr:�•ctsttt��c1(.i °� ��i -?{) 1,3f� ��i resitluai), unl�.4, �Ci'�1 �>ro+�ide, updaied n�c�ci�l i:2fi3m�ation .((1at�i fitr !'1� :#!)l?, ei4x<tti��ia �0+)�i..t�idc �jre4:,ur� - lfi3 psi� 2. 1-4?r tla� 3U(![l �pni lirl( rx�tctcd fire ili��, fi�r tltc I�ittther- (2.i�1�� KGn1��.�tic�r� {�xr�lit7ti�tary �stirt�<tic hy �;I�aner [.rfc �af"�t�� t, it is rcGC�ttlmcr�d�ci that tl�e i�ciici�tecf fi�ld tcst rz,i�z��l ��rc,�ur� cat f iI {)1' (rl«��ticsn `�f)�3t�, xi<iti� prc.�urG lb i E�;i} t>�� l(7?.� Et*,i 1>�� rs�s.1. ]e44 1`? ��,r (�+t�'�t rnc�c�e�1 for ta3�k #�<�li�#izll. puzY�p. c�fl: etr} - 92.5 �si residual. Flo�r 'I�e�k Sec�u_encc: 1 C?be.�inec3 ;t<�ti: pr��;�;urr,. _'. f'l��t�ctl snti�ll rt�t� {��p�>rc�x ??(� gPttt) to �>bt<�in c3�ita l;�r tlte `nkaller ,iut�>�t�.3tit �pra�ti,l�r:�,tctt3 (��ric7r ttr YR�..:; �>peaiin� uE��r4 pre�+:+ut`e m��y tncrc<�s�), 3. t��>eni�cj <�nc^ i�yc��-��t :��c� tn�a5t�rc;d tf�e fIc�� wiih a pitc�t t�uc�� (,.t1t�u� rntrr�,ter" ��r �iFt�il.u� f�i<y�a� riies�4tirin� de� icc�i. ��ci tnct�sureci resiilztal ��re4,u��. �3t tu�f, z�e�sr1�� t7,y�ciz•astt� (F�� tl lf� � t}7tl). -�. ()}�c�t�c:i i�c,th fi}dr.rntti, i�7�a:,carcci tl��.�� ctn�i ritiiduK�li: in a cix�iil,�i° n��t7rzer. '�. fic�w��rr�d rt�:iii�xzrl r>r��;�;ur�::uerec:c�t��crteit trc}n� t2�e Fi# 4�i�ere n�e��:xzrcd, zr� ( ilf)1'_>. t fc:a a��,t:�ttFtt f�7r th� ��i�re, Ic„srs t�etE��ee.i� thc� �alenstsceci a��l fltf��c�{i 1�vd�at7ts�. '1"e�( lla1:►: t�irc t�G>ur E��t c�zat� is �?r<��•�d�ei c�x� tlze �rtt<t�.�hrti s�r��cl:iic�c.t. L�rel Cxtrf3e:ratecl <;ra�}r� ;��ici t�as�d cira�4i� _�r,t��}t*: �tr�: attt��;hz�i. �.)i?St',Cti'FI[:Ii�i11S'. 1. SC;�;1 m��dc�lec9 tt�i� f�rcit. ttnc� ,ugc��,ic°�1 t1�:�€ ta l7c7�� r��te c>t -4€)tltl ��ixi �� Ici f c�z�it ita t� ��rsiciusil �rt�e.,ure i�t ?? ��;s. I`his <��e.rra t�� 1-�e i��;i t�t�,- I�Yti, c°:tit�-a��crl�riccl y4ra�>}�} t�> 3tl t�,i die�� tii ��; s;�� s<�p}�) #c>«�� r tt1z��1 rxtr.o�{�Iz�t�d c.ur�e ciqit� ti�>r�t t1�� :7c��.ii fl��ti� tc;�t. I°��r 7ric>c�clt��. tazsks ��r� titi�u��e��3 tt� bc htilf'fuli tti��k�i�}t c:i,xulc� rG�t'c_si�rtt I{) l;� fcc't C:tf�k �itip�E[� -..5��,i `}. <�il �r��r�� .,ff�. a�i�i i�uture baek*rc��t�i ��1Gr c3esr�an�3 �w �r��I�rcl��ci (_t�t�rr� xc�,sl�c�E �i�.e� n�a��t:� n1t>r� �v�k�t t�tM��t�iat� � Nc�vember ?4, 2C?09 thru }�ipcs <�r�� rt�,7r� tri�ti��2t i�>4�c� k>�ver ��rc�s4;ur�,}. i)��t�t �i iI] l�e t:tdbt�wrtk+:.ti tv .`?Ci%1 ti>r }>c�,:,ikslti tnc+dr[ c�tlitarztti{+�1 ��ur��se,. I"hc es�ci t��iitirateti (��,i ��, �,*�?n�} �r;�pi�. tt�: Gve;ll <t� ih� 1a.�nx� cir�tt�ri {��i �:. ��>rn) �s�il {1<�� 7�i �ti ��7E�r> �h«ti�� t� �li�h[ "taii�s" at ti�e 1��•° tlt�u, (tl�> Yt2�r' .�uE7}�lti:i�7c:ntec3 Y7e��.v) ,�r�2t, i l�ik �.�>ulti b� tlle rt�:u(t crf I'1�t", si��1��ta�utit�� Ilc�«=�:.�i hi�=Ir�r Ilcx��« r�rl�4, ar ��aa�ia�r ir�zt�c�ur��c i<�, cr� .� r�k�ali �r( i3�eatstarirz� �tac:►7 Icn�� flve�f�., c�r ht,th, �>r c>t1�cr. `i'Irc c�it�f�eecttti�rl (cti,rr��aai�Gv°? a�>��t��, ti> b� �t�it�<»• , �rcjb;rl�Iv le5ti tl�,ttt ? p,i. Iftiou I��t any c�uc5ticzn:?, plea,c ��rll. tale�m E'�llr�itrs E'E l',�il"('ianbtrf2r`dtz'()()�ii�"ire(�law I�etit.�c�<: 2 � � � � ' . fiimber Ridge �H Flow Test, Nov 20, 2Q09: Data represents How and Pressures at 1=H#012 � Re:erwsd map5j S � �tT(� Fir� riydrant El�v �ydr�nt Static F"SI Eiev adjust to FM016 1N�sfi lvieasure� #��l�i} $108 155 155 32�}kf �"�s� 1Ne5; Flcav� (#pl�j . 8092 lf5 16{.A33}=..7, p�i= 158 ��C,�t �...,,�E� E a5t 'riow t#i112� 8096 163 78�1f 8" �If� EasCMeasure (#07Q) 8116*J- iSCi 8(.433}-3,4psi= 151.5 POINT WHERE RE51DJFlt�W converted*** Flow �H#012 5�si pifiot ��nd siciz,tpr�ssure at FH#012}= 250gpm Fire Nycirant El�v Hydr�nt Static PSI Residual Adjusted Resid�FN�t012* 1�i�st Me��sure( #016} A108 155 150 psi �5 drop) {5+0.2A*)=psi �5.2A droP) (8001f [in.03psiJlJfl�c`�125gpm} West Flout (#f�14) 8092 165 East Flowed t#Oi2} *** �096 1b3 25d �pm 1�3-[i.:.�A drtrp= 258 Residu�l EastMeasure (#079) �i11�+1- 150 lA6psi(=l drop) *�ssume 1%2 c�f 25t7 flcawed gpm ccames from each direction {S psi c�rop to east hydrant at 320+S8t7-�001f, ��ti drop to east meas�ar�d FH t��7801f, �boul equal drnp,about equal distancesj Flaw FN�t�I� 1�5�si pit�t ant� 1�� id�,;pr�ssure at FH#�?121= 195(} gprtt 'F�r� Nydr��r�t El�v Hydrant SCatic PSI Residuaf Adjusteci 12esidC�.�FN#p12* 't;vest M�as,ur�( #Cizti) �S1o� 15� 14t� psi (lsdrop} ,1s-20.5*j= ('?5.5 drap} .�� 8001f iw.p3psi/1�0�1�5�pr�t} lh!�st �.I�w �?#t}�.A� 8?92 1�i5 East Flowed �#Oi2j *** 8�36 i ib3 1950 gpm 553-�25.5+24,Sj12drop= 138.2 Residual Ekjstti�ltasura {#{J7G� �11�+%- 15Q 136�asi {2�dr�R} * assurr�e �g,7U�� i�f flaw com�sfrc�m west 17�1��an�}, 51.3`�°� fram �astl2if��pm} �50 gpm �a7 9Qt}I; fi°C�fP =1U,5 psi,' 1i�UC��prri ,z� 7£3UIf 8,�DIP- 1ii.Uf� psi '��r ;. 1� dro�a + 1t�.� to FN-24.5psi dre�p � � � Flow FH�I{1�.2 117p�i �itot and 13tJ side/pressure at FH#012)= 1815 gpm Also Flow FH#014 �3Q psi piTot; 11� side pr�s�ure= 1592gpm Pitot, 181Sgpm side pressure guage {us� 1592gpm) T�tal flow = 1825+ 1542= 340i gpm �usin�; pitot� or 353t1 using pr�ssure �uage Fire Hydrant Elav Hydrant Statit PSI R��iduaC Adjusted Resid��N#012' G4'�st Me�sure( #C�ifi} 8108 155 115 p�i {4QdrUp} (40+1�.5�`i= {55.5 drop) (8{}UIF �.Cl3psi/1{?4C�?125gpm} West Flat�v (#C�14j 8D92 16S 1592gpm pitat-1815gprt� East Flawed (#012j""* �3096 163 1815 gpm 1C3-(55.5+56}JZdrop= 107.5 Residual (Total=3407gpm} EastMeasure �#Q70) 8114+1- 150 1?4psi �2�idropj 2a dro� + 3tl t� FH=56psi dre�� * assume A8.7%af flt�w comesfrom west (1673gprn}, 51.3l� from east {1753gPmi iG73 gpm �«� 32t�if �3"'DIP = a0.5 psi: 1763gpm �a 78q1f S"DIP= 3t} psi FiC}W,gpm Pressure,psi Lo� �P��i G� 163 2.2121876d� �5t� 15� 2.1986570$7 1�5Ci 138.2 �.14n50£i043 �407 107.5 2.031408464 �,,. ,d� � ""'^� !.i) 3 � 1 �{; 1 �Ci 1�Q 12G 100 `� ii0 t�Q d0 2d � �l � PSI vs GP�1 ' Seriesl _. I 5(}p 100G 1500 2000 250Q 3400 3500 400G' GPM 2S _ _ _ ._. . _ .,. _ . G ' � 1 � ; . ,_ _ _ 3 S _.. _ . _. , _ _ '� 1.5 i.ta� P5i Vs t�P�,�l _. �. 0 ,-, o � � � _. � .. I _. � �.� — _ _� —. __ �_ _ , _._,..� __..__. �...,..__ � ._�_...,._ _,..._ ._..: i , , �, _ ,. _ G SOCi 1Q(lt� 1�G�� Zt�G� 250C1 30C}C 3500 �OQO GPM � $eriesl � � � � �p; t �` � �SL ;� t.,� � �_w� � �C''�t 3,/ � � � C`� �...�. � �``i � � 1 ; $� �: � �. i�%� A+°"`�;t�'` �,"°' �L.�l'�-.'. �:�.;`�`�? i , .., __ � _. _ �:m; ; � a�: � _. _ _ �3 + _, � � . . �� (: _ �� ;: � � ;�. �� "�� a` ��" mm�+ ,;„ "i' �`� t �`,� x'�� ' � €� - �� ;� r ,..� U��^ . �. . �, � � , :?, € �� . a;,, . , ..- \ r-' c ,�.k ,�� ' > �= h��, : .� � � � ,: - „��;� �� : �� - f '.c�• . �� ,�:;�. � � . .. �"�y ��.`. . r � ,- _ �. ; ,� . . , ,... . .. �' . i. p� � d � , f C C,:.v�,C� "�r' ' � .�� x�� .`.. -�, ,, � _ ,,.. � ._,,� ��.,.�„'"..^.--.,..-,._._._._u.._, ;` �: " . .'� ; �d�? �`° G'�,� �s � ., .�"�a . . . � . ..,.'"' . _--.� .. . " ' � . . .. ,.. , . . .... . +!�--., . ' _ ' . E � . . . . . , . ,--::.., _ .. . ;. "--,. . �... �... .�,...,...,.�.,.. � o.:� -.. --�...�.;� .� ��.�..:.�....... .�. �. -...... . �. ' .. � "_.„. � . . �--�,�. . . � � � � �� . j , > � � � , � � I ` . _ w � � � � �'`��"+�"�.z.°: � =f�°.�"r�'; :=��T�-t�''�` � ��,; *��: = , . c�"'�%��,: � �*'..,1.��i"�� r , _ /* � a�� ir� d��`;�:; ; -t,+�C' k �1�= ` .� �.$�.�.�, .�iL.� �j,,;N".�`"„� ��'�' _� �`. �� _. � �_.� f : , 4 ' � �� `� �_ ,. � �} � � ^, ;� � � t *+. "�_. � �. � � �*, a� � �; � �.> t� ��, � �� t . ; , sc��_ �� -�� ;� "„"" �. W f .. , _ ... .�" _ .^� , . �" ` �_ �i i"!� y �.z �� •.,_..! ,�, � � � I; � `.� r� � , r � �:' ,�, } ,�-� �� ` � �M '� `�--T' 1 � : �.�"�" i� � Y` .� t� { �' Ps� � `d'ri l �.. . iL� � 4°3 �k'� �... l. c� c. � '�"` J c��1 � � �-� �/ $ � �3 � `t � ��"; F�. � � �1 �J�`�t "; ; 1� � �'°� t� :`", � � �::�,t� �� ,�' � � r > i � A ry�� } �a ;t �,��" ��y� � �.�, ��' � �� , r' �� _. �"^^� �„ w... '�.'--°^--.�..,.„��'� �ttt � p,� ; ..�...�_Po_4 .�,.. � � ,� �� r �� , i: � . ��. � � � � _ . ik. a . , . �. _ _ ,� _.a. , � _~� ; 4 ' � -� ; � �.... � � � � � , . a �; ,� ;�� , �,�ti, ,�' �.: � �'i �' �� ,� , �' �� 4 � ,4 +,.�„ �� j t� �,�, �� ,,�E � �� ._�� ro; +� ,�t� � ,� �� . ,�� . _a�—_..�_ �c. �.� . �� .� °�� .. .�� _ �� . � ��r� � �°a ` ` � --��;? �.�.. � i� � � � � � � � � �� "��'��'�``� � � • • ��I C�IE:11Ci P1�1Ttt'1" Frvcn: Debarah Sh�n�r-Lueck [shaneris�comcast.n�i] �ent: Thursday, November 19, 20(}3 3:08 PM To; Gle�n Paimer Cc: 'Lee ihc�mas' '-..-, s�. `. � f , Subject: RE: What is the fiire fiow for Timber Ridge? '+' _. �c,.. �cccardln�; t�? Va€I �;re E�e�artrr�er�t's iire flc�w ir��vrn��akiur� c�� tht��r �nr�ta�ilka twhich tiiffe�r� � E�it fror�� ;=N tsr� c c�c�,=; tiE-.r�,`;, �.^.��7�t ! cc�rne �� wNil�: ; c�r th� IiIA Ra��C1�r�ti�) a� '�7(J,Ut7�i �t;��re feet, tttP taE;[� �;iv�4 �,,{�t�C? ��ax�r. � or tt��> 9A C;�r��e at lfa4,Z5C) sc�uar� feet, ti7e talal� �ives �SC�Ci ��rr�. ,� �;{3`/„ recl�3itic�rr i� ��ilowFj�.f f€�r sprinkl�rs. I�.vouit� ar�u:� tt�at the �trcas of IiIA �r�c! IA �rc� s��arat� hy #ir� se�a�x-�tir�r�s, sc� crr�ly T�t� rtt�st r�=st:r��t��e :�a�» a{�}�IieS _ til�y cl�a r7�t t��ve tt� k�e �dc1��c1 tc��;ether. Ttef� �rc7u{c� g�ve � fire fNc�w crF a�30(') �,�>�rt, l�ss ��"�1 �vhfrl� :�=y��al� ��3(X) ��rrr. Sh��rt �r�:,w�r: �tJ(Jt� ��art7 ��t� fir� fii�?w fc�r tt�e Tin�k��r R�d�,� ,�t�. t�r�7 tryir�� tcr �,et feeec.� u� f�r fit�e tloGV kest tc�rr�t�rrc�w, ncrt ��3re if i car� �t� th��. I ix;�<� a�r��ric��: �:esrt�r°r�it$ti�2t�t tt��t 1 an� tryir��; tc� re�rrar��. (iek�bie C)et��ar�t� L. Shar��r ��ck, P.E. S��r�er L�f� 5t�f�ty t�}7!.)) 4C)�3 �C��? Fram: Glenn Palmer [mailta:palmerci?aipinecivil.cam] Sent. Thursday, Nov�mber 19, 2009 2:54 PM Tt�: C�eborah Shaner Subjes:t: What is the fire flaw for Timber Ridge? W� need to know what the fire flow is, scs we know nurnber of hydrants fia fiow. The test is tome�rro�r n�orr�ing. Gienr� :� "�a_� � 5339 Alpha Road T 972.701.9636 Suite 300 F 972.701.9639 Dallas, Texas 75240 W humphreys.com HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L,P. Dallas • Irvine • New Orleans • Orlando CODE ANALYSIS FOR VAIL TIMBER RIDGE HPA Project Number 2009024 Town of Vail, Colorado Adopted Codes: 2009 International Building Code, including Appendix Chapters B, C, E, G, J, i � Architedure � Planning Interiors . `;.,,.,... � � � � � � MAR 111010 TOWN OF VAIL 2009 International Fire Code, including Appendix Chapters B, C, D, E, G, H, I and J. 2009 International Mechanical Code, including Appendix A. 2009 International Plumbing Code 2009 International Fuel Gas Code 2009 International Energy Conservation Code 2008 National Electrical Code Scope of Work: The project is comprised of a 5-story wood-framed apartment building of Type III-A Construction wrapped around a 5 level enclosed parking garage of Type I-A Construction. The Ground Level is a basement. The project includes 352 dwelling units, a clubhouse/leasing facility, and resident storage facilities. The project has three elevators and all dwelling units will be covered dwelling units complying with the Fair Housing Act and the adopted building code. 2% of the total number of dwelling units (8 units) will be defined as Type A dwelling units and will dispersed among the unit classes. Occupancies Classified: Principal Occupancv: Wood-framed apartments — R-2 Separated Occupancies: Storage Facilities inside garage — S-1; 1-hour fire barrier per Table 508.4. Separated Occupanices: Wood-framed clubhouse — A-3; 1-hour fire barrier per Table 508.4. Actual A-3 + Allowable A-3 7.911 SF + 42,000 SF Actual R-2 < 1 Allowable R-2 3.066 SF = .26 43,200 SF Enclosed parking garage — S-2; 1-hour fire barrier per Table 508.4 Actual S-2 + Allowable S-2 32,841 SF + � Actual R-2 < 1 Allowable R-2 11,552 SF = .27 43,200 SF Incidential Uses: Waste Collection Rooms over 100 square feet/Trash Chute Termination Rooms — 1-hour fire barrier. OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 � Page 2 of 15 Buildinq Attributes The building is equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The allowable areas are: R-2 = 24,000 SF/floor + 200% increase for NFPA 13 sprinkler = 72,000 SF/floor 72,000 SF x 3 for multi-story building = 216,000 SF divided by 5 stories = 43,200 SF/floor A-3 = 14,000 SF/floor + 200% increase for NFPA 13 sprinkler = 42,000 SF/floor S-2 = Unlimited area No increase for frontage has been considered. Fire Area 1 Actual Area Fire Area 2 Actual Area Fire Area 3 Actual Area Basement Basement Basement R-2 3,066 R-2 11,552 R-2 8,298 A-3 7,911 S-2 25,155 First Floor First Floor First Floor R-2 25,135 R-2 11,363 R-2 25,004 S-2 32,841 Second Floor Second Floor Second Floor R-2 25,463 R-2 11,363 R-2 25,319 S-2 32,841 Third Floor Third Floor Third Floor R-2 25,377 R-2 11,278 R-2 22,880 S-2 32,841 Fourth Floor Fourth Floor Fourth Floor R-2 25,504 R-2 11,419 R-2 21,907 S-2 32,841 Fifth Floor Fifth Floor Fifth Floor R-2 18,980 R-2 0 R-2 18,825 S-2 19,693 Buildinq Heiqht in Feet Allowable Heights: R-2 = 85 feet with NFPA 13 increase of 20 feet A-3 = 85 feet with NFPA 13 increase of 20 feet S-2 = Unlimited Actual Heights: This is still under review but confident that the height will be approximately 20 feet below the maximum allowable height. *Towers and other roof structures, not used for storage or habitation and constructed of combustible materials, can extend 20 feet above the allowable building height of 85 feet. Buildinq Heiqht in Stories Allowable Heights: R-2 = 5 stories with NFPA 13 increase of 1 story A-3 = 4 stories with NFPA 13 increase of 1 story S-2 = Unlimited O Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 3 of 15 Actual Heights: R-2 = 5 stories with a basement A-3 = 2 stories S-2 = 4 stories with roof level parking (5 levels) Storv Above Grade Plane. Any story having its finished floor surface entirely above grade plane, or in which the finished surface of the floor next above is: 1. More than 6 feet above grade plane; or 2. More than 12 feet above the finished ground level at any point. This is a terraced building. Per Figure 502-6 of the 200618C Handbook, a terraced building can be evaluated in segments to determine the number of stories. W`herc t.�ie h�il�3in� is ,i�P�r'� ;�r tc,rr�ccd. is is lu�i:a� th.�t thc ��ight i� thr mazimu�sr hs-i��he c�i uny scgmCnt c,f ti€r bui�di��. It may hc uppt�a�ri�te un�3rr crrt�in c�reumst�m-� th�t tiar numhrr crf �t�aric� 'rn n EsuiE,lin� k� detcrnci�r�c3 in the samc mann�cr. Bea:�sc nf thr v:tryinC requimments caE thr c�fr that arr r�iatrr��33 t� nc� numtrer c�f st�ties, such u_: me�ns c�f egm��, t�•pr �f cunstructic}n. �re resistarscr c�f shatit rnclUSUr�s, ctc., cach e�.s+e 'Iri 1�e jur��ci! indivi�n�ltu kaas� can thc chsr�Cerisaics c�f ihr sit� �nd c�tru�ti�rn. In ��tt3it�cxi tn tha�se facicars �rtit€s rclatrc3 t� ihr numbrr ��F siczrics, ntiucr itrms co ionsidrr ssrc Irre �3r�s�rnt ac:acrss, ]c�ation c}1' extcricrr exit drx4�. rckutrs €�f exit tr�vc� �r;� t; F�� f *��.ar:rti� 9�eetve°acn ��men�.s. F�i� urL _'±f_i'-�, iliet�eeatcs cxtc ex�m�+lr irt �r�hi4it ih,: i�iglat crf tk,t buiidin� and num�r crf �t,�rics arr �ctcrnainctl fcir a steppec� c-+r terracc�t buil,�in�. [n the casc nf a ste�3 c,r c�rrat.:exi k�uil�tin�;. thr 1�rtgu��r Pirt�rl �eretn�ter is usc� to �Icfinc the si4saatirs�s srp�ratin� thc iir:�t :;t�>ry fr:�m a basEmrnt and is intest3td ic� incl�C the entirc perirnct�t �}E th� sr�mcnt ;,t t1-ar hu��lin�. T3r�rct��a. in thc ta�ns-srcti�m c,f F=ir:ur� 3E�_ ?, �hr k��al �rim�:tcr �;C thc "�:ik4t.�U•,� r':ey�#�..• u} U:. i]N1:3 i� t� R�; Ye�if'Aalt2s �:3xw': 1 ida�x�nurt� r�m3lar p( aLe�9a� iis 3� �� s � t re.�sd 2 H �"°; xt ` .: ��.�? 't. "htz-:3 4".":.-.nr, $�'t#4'f � .. si��h'..��". '"1�.=ra a1.nr�;c•: ��£ yy 4....^...' t�{�P?r.�E:�;. l. .'�,..k'� ^ �2 ` 4?°- s!:.-rr.;. �, E � i'. �4 (.�— L"t\'z/ Cr"adn �Iar,�r 5e�}r=er+t 3 ,.1a� .. ... .,� _. _ �, . s f ra;�s�• '.3 ; '" . , � Ta�al.�tt'd w( , - ,.smY° i'r�rilrlltzr � SV� � C=foty.± �dr..:« , *�sr ;'r,± .. , c°��qe �inc. 5��, r ,• ? Sprinkler Svstem The buildings will be sprinkled throughout with an NFPA 13 fully-automatic sprinkler system. Construction Tvpe R-2 = Type I II-A A-3 = Type III-A S-2 = Type I-A Table 601 Buildin Element T e I-A T e III-A OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 4 of 15 Prima Structural Frame 3 hours 1 hour Bearing walls Exterior 3 hours 2 hours Interior 3 hours 1 hour Nonbearing walls Exterior See Table 602 Nonbearing walls and partitions 0 hours 0 hours Interior Floor construction and 2 hours 1 hour secondar members Roof construction and 1'/2 hours 1 hour seconda members Fire Separation Distance The distance measured from the building face to one of the following: 1. The closest interior lot line; 2. To the centerline of a street, an alley or public way; or 3. To an imaginary line between two buildings on the property. The distance shall be measured at right angles from the face of the wall. Table 602 Fire Se aration Distance = x feet T e of Construction Occu anc Grou A, R, S-2 X<5 All 1 5<X<10 IA 1 IIIA 1 105X<30 IA 1 IIIA 1 X ? 30 All 0 The northeast side of the building is 20 feet from the property line, which has the smallest fire separation distance. Per Table 705.8, there is no limit to unprotected openings with a building equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system per NFPA 13. Chapter 4 Motor-Vehicle Related Occupancies 406.2.2 The clear height of each floor level in vehicle and pedestrian traffic areas shall not be less than 7 feet. Vehicle and pedestrian areas accommodating van-accessible parking required by Section 1106.5 shail conform to ICC A117.1 (8'-2" clear height). There is one van parking space located on Level 1. 406.2.4 Vehicle barrier systems not less than 2'-9" high shall be placed at the end of drive lanes, and at the end of parking spaces where the vertical distance to the ground or surface directly below is greater than 1 foot. 406.2.5 Vehicle ramps shall not be considered as required exits unless pedestrian facilities are provided. Vehicle ramps that are utilized for vertical circulation as well as for parking shall not exceed a slope of 1:15 (6.67%). Zoning requires 6°/o maximum slope. 406.2.7 Parking garages shall be separated from other occupancies in accordance with Section 508.1. The parking garage will be separated from Fire Area 1 and Fire Area 2 by a 3-hour fire wall. The parking garage wil/ be separated from Fire 2 by a 1-hour fire barrier per Table 508.4. 406.4.2 A mechanical ventilation system shall be provided in accordance with the International Mechanical Code. Two vertical shafts are provided in the southern corners. OO Humphreys 8 Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 5 of 15 Chapter 10 Eqress Quantity of exits: Minimum of two per floor per fire area. A maximum of 50% may be horizontal exits. One exit from each dwelling unit. Capacity of exits: All occupant loads will be noted on the exiting plan provided at Plan Check. OccupantLoad Per Table 1004.1.1 Residential = 200 gross Assembly: unconcentrated (tables and chairs) = 15 net Parking Garage = 200 gross Exercise Room = 50 gross Business Areas = 100 gross Accessory Storage, Mechanical equipment Room = 300 gross Dead Ends 1018.4 Dead ends. Where more than one exit or exit access doorway is required, the exit access shall be arranged such that there are no dead ends in corridors more than 50 feet in length (Occ. R-2, S with NFPA 13 sprinkler system); 20 feet in length otherwise. Exit Access Travel Distance 1016.1 Travel distance limitations. Exits shall be so located on each story such that the maximum length of exit access travel, measured from the most remote point within a story along the natural and unobstructed path of egress travel to an exterior door at the level of exit discharge, an entrance to a vertical exit enclosure, an exit passageway, a horizontal exit, an exterior exit stairway or an exterior exit ramp, shall not exceed the distances given in Table 1016.1. Table 1601.1 Occu anc With S rinkler S stem feet A, R, S-1 250 S-2 400 Exit Access 1014.3 Common path of egress travel. In occupancies other than Groups H-1, H-2 and H-3, the common path of egress travel shall not exceed 75 feet. Exceptions: 1. The length of a common path of egress travel in Group B, F and S occupancies shall not be more than 100 feet, provided that the building is equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1(NFPA 13). 4. The length of a common path of egress travel in Group R-2 occupancy shall not be more than 125 feet, provided that the building is protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 (NFPA 13). The common path of travel will not exceed 125 feet in R-2; 100 feet in S-1/S-2; 75 feet in A-3. Exit and Exit Access Doorwavs 1015.1 Exit or exit access doorways required. Two exits or exit access doorways from any space shall be provided where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The occupant load of the space exceeds the values in Table 1015.1. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, one means of egress is permitted within and from individual dwelling units with a maximum occupant load of 20 where the dwelling unit is equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 (NFPA 13). 2. The common path of egress travel exceeds the limitations of Section 1014.3. 3. Where required by Sections 1015.3, 1015.4 and 1015.5, 1015.6 or 1015.6.1. OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 6 of 15 Where a building contains mixed occupancies, each individual occupancy shall comply with the applicable requirements for that occupancy. Where applicable, cumulative occupant loads from adjacent occupancies shall be considered in accordance with the provisions of Section 1004.1. Table 1015.1 Occu anc Maximum Occu ant Load A 49 S 29 R 20 er exce tion 1 1015.2.1 Two exits or exit access doorways. Where two exits or exit access doorways are required from any portion of the exit access, the exit doors or exit access doorways shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area to be served measured in a straight line befinreen exit doors or exit access doorways. Interlocking or scissor stairs shall be counted as one exit stairway. Exceptions: 1. Where exit enclosures are provided as a portion of the required exit and are interconnected by a 1-hour fire-resistance-rated corridor conforming to the requirements of Section 1017, the required exit separation shall be measured along the shortest direct line of travel within the corridor. 2. Where a building is equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the separation distance of the exit doors or exit access doorways shall not be less than one-third of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the area served. 1021.2 Single exits. Only one exit shall be required from other buildings as indicated in Table 1021.2. Occupancies shall be permitted to have a single exit in buildings otherwise required to have more than one exit if the areas served by the single exit do not exceed the limitations of Table 1021.2. Mixed occupancies shall be permitted to be served by single exits provided each individual occupancy complied with the applicable requirements of Table 1021.2 for that occupancy. Where applicable, cumulative occupant loads from adjacent occupancies shall be considered in accordance with provisions of Section 1004.1. Basements with a single exit shall not be located more than one story below grade plane. Table 1021.2 Maximum Occupants (or Story Occupancy Dwelling Units) per Floor and Travel Distance A 49 occupants and 75 feet travel distance First story or basement S w/NFPA 13 49 occu ants and 100 feet R 10 occupants and 75 feet travel distance S 29 occupants and 75 feet Second story travel distance R-2 4 dwelling units and 50 feet travel distance Third story R-2 w/ NFPA 13 or 13R and 4 dwelling units and 50 feet e ress windows travel distance Some of the Ground Floor units (classified as a basement) will have exterior unit entries to satisfy the maximum occupants requirements of Table 1021.2. The interior corridor and stair will not serve as an exit for the units with access directly to the exterior. OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 7 of 15 Eqress Illumination 1006.1 Illumination required. The means of egress, including the exit discharge, shall be illuminated at all times the building space served by the means of egress is occupied. Exception: 3. Dwelling units in Group R-2. 1006.2 Illumination level. The means of egress illumination level shall not be less than 1 foot- candle at the walking surface. 1006.3. Illumination emergency power. The power supply for means of egress illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' electrical supply. In the event of power failure, an emergency electrical system shall automatically illuminate all of the following areas: 1. Aisles and unenclosed egress stairways in rooms and spaces that require two or more means of egress. 2. Corridors, exit enclosures and exit passageways in buildings required to have two or more exits. 3. Exterior egress components at other than their levels of exit discharge is accomplished for buildings required to have two or more exits. 4. Interior exit discharge elements, as permitted in Section 1027.1, in buildings required to have two or more exits. 5. Exterior landings as required by Section 1008.1.6 for exit discharge doorways in buildings required to have two or more exits. The emergency power system shall provide power for duration of not less than 90 minutes and shall consist of storage batteries, unit equipment or an on-site-generator. The installation of the emergency power system shall be in accordance with Chapter 27. Exit Sipns 1011.1 Where required. Exits and exit access doors shall be marked by an approved exit sign readily visible from any direction of egress travel. The path of egress travel to exits and within exits shall be marked by readily visible exit signs to clearly indicate the direction of egress travel in cases where the exit or the path of egress travel is not immediately visible to the occupants. Intervening means of egress doors within exits shall be marked by exit signs. Exit sign placement shall be such that no point in an exit access corridors or exit passageway is more than 100 feet or the listed viewing distance for the sign, whichever is less, from the nearest visible exit sign. Exceptions 1. Exit signs are not required in rooms or areas that required only one exit or exit access. 2. Main exterior exit doors or gates that area obviously and clearly identifiable as exits need not have exit signs where approved by the building official. 3. Exit signs are not required in dwelling units in Group R-2. 1011.2 Illumination. Exit signs shall be internally or externally illuminated. Exception: Tactile signs required by Section 1011.3 need not be provided with illumination. 1011.3 Tactile exit signs. A tactile sign stating EXIT and complying with ICC A117.1 shall be provided adjacent to each door to an area of refuge, an exterior area for assisted rescue, an exit stairway, an exit ramp, an exit passageway and the exit discharge. Eqress Width 1005.1 Minimum required egress width. The means of egress width shall not be less than required by this section. The total width of ineans of egress in inches shall not be less than the total occupant load served by the means of egress multiplied by 0.3 inches per occupant for stairways and by 0.2 inches per occupant for other egress components. The width shall not be less than specified elsewhere in this code. Multiple means of egress shall be sized such that OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 8 of 15 the loss of any one means of egress shall not reduce the available capacity to less than 50 percent of the required capacity. The maximum capacity required from any story of a building shall be maintained to the termination of the means of egress. Exception: Means of egress complying with Section 1028. 1005.2 Door encroachment. Doors, when fully opened, and handrails shall not reduce the required means of egress width by more than 7 inches. Doors in any position shall not reduce the required width by more than one-half. Other nonstructural projections such as trim and similar decorative features shall be permitted to project into the required width a maximum opening into the path of egress travel shall not reduce the required width to less than one-half during the course of the swing. When fully open, the door shall not project more than 7 inches into the required width. Exception: The restrictions on a door swing shall not apply to doors within individual dwelling units of Group R-2. Exit Enclosures 1022.1 Enclosures required. Interior exit stairways and interior exit ramps shall be enclosed with fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 712, or both. Exit enclosures shall have a fire-resistance rating of not less than 2 hours where connecting four stories or more and not less than 1 hour where connecting less than four stories. The number of stories connected by the exit enclosure shall include any basements but not any mezzanines. Exit enclosures shall have a fire-resistance rating not less than the floor assembly penetrated, but need not exceed 2 hours. Exit enclosures shall lead directly to the exterior of the building or shall be extended to the exterior of the building with an exit passageway conforming to the requi�ements of Section 1023, except as permitted in Section 1027.1. An exit enclosure shall not be used for any purpose other than means of egress. 1022.3 Openings and penetrations. Exit enc�osure opening protectives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Section 715. Openings in exit enclosures other than unprotected exterior openings shall be limited to those necessary for exit access to the enclosure from normally occupied spaces and for egress from the enclosure. Elevators shall not open into an exit enclosure. 1022.6 Exit enclosure exterior walls. Exterior walls of an exit enclosure shall comply with the requirements of Section 705 for exterior walls. Where nonrated walls or unprotected openings enc�ose the exterior of the stairway and the walls or openings are exposed by other parts of the building at an angle of less than 180 degrees, the building exterior walls within 10 feet horizontally of a nonrated wall or unprotected opening shall have a fire-resistance rating of not less than 1 hour. Openings within such exterior walls shall be protected by opening protectives having a fire protection rating of not less than 3/4 hour. This construction shall extend vertically from the ground to a point 10 feet above the topmost landing of the stairway or to the roof line, whichever is lower. All exterior walls will be one-hour rated but openings will be rated only if within the mandated distance. 1022.7 Discharge identification. A stairway in an exit enclosure shall not continue below its level of exit discharge unless an approved barrier is provided at the level of exit discharge to prevent persons from unintentionally continuing into levels below. Directional exit signs shall be provided as specified in Section 1011. The garage exit stairs discharge at the 4t'' level. Approved barriers will be in place to keep occupants from the 4�`' and 5th level from continuing downward. OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 � Page 9 of 15 1022.8 Floor identification signs. A sign shall be provided at each floor landing in exit enclosures connecting more than three stories designating the floor level, the terminus of the top and bottom of the exit enclosure and the identification of the stair or ramp. The signage shall also state the story of, and the direction to, the exit discharge and the availability of roof access from the enclosure for the fire department. The sign shall be located 5 feet above the floor landing in a position that is readily visible when the doors are in the open and closed positions. Floor level identification signs in tactile characters complying with ICC A117.1 shall be located at each floor level landing adjacent to the door leading from the enclosure into the corridor to identify the floor level. Horizontal Exits 1025.1 Horizontal exits. Horizontal exits serving as an exit in a means of egress system shall comply with the requirements of this section. A horizontal exit shall not serve as the only exit from a portion of a building, and where two or more exits are required, not more than one-half of the total number of exits or total exit width shall be horizontal exits. From the IBC Handbook, `A horizontal exit consists essentially of separating a floor into parts by dividing it with construction having a fire-resistance rating. The construction of one or more horizontal exit walls divides the floor into fire compartments. A horizontal exit may also be located between two buildings where travel occurs from one building to an area in another building at approximately the same level. This would include trave/ through a fire wall...Although horizontal exits are most frequently used only where the more traditional forms of egress design are not satisfactory, they can often be used quite effectively in many situations. In fact, in those instances where fire wa/ls having a fire-resistance rating of not less than 2 hours are provided, the resulting arrangement is often tailor-made for use as a horizontal exit. "When properly constructed and installed, a horizontal exit may serve as a required exit. It may, in fact, be substituted on a one-for-one basis for other types of exits. Fire Area 1& 2 have access to two vertical exit stair enclosures and a horizontal exit leading to the garage. 1025.2 Separation. The separation befinreen buildings or refuge areas connected by a horizontal exit shall be provided by a fire wall complying with Section 706; or it shall be provided by a fire barrier complying with Section 707 or a horizontal assembly complying with Section 712, or both. The minimum fire-resistance rating of the separation shall be 2 hours. Opening protectives in horizontal exits shall also comply with Section 715. Duct and air transfer openings in a fire wall or fire barrier that serves as a horizontal exit shall also comply with Section 716. The horizontal exit separation shall extend vertically through all levels of the building unless floor assemblies have a fire-resistance rating of not less than 2 hours with no unprotected openings. Horizontal exit walls constructed as fire barriers shall be continuous from exterior wall to exterior wall so as to divide completely the floor served by the horizontal exit. 1025.3 Opening protectives. Fire doors in horizontal exits shall be self-closing or automatic- cfosing when activated by a smoke detector in accordance with Section 715.4.8.3. Doors, where located in a cross-corridor condition, shall be automatic-closing by activation of a smoke detector installed in accordance with Section 715.4.8.3. 1025.4 Capacity of refuge area. The refuge area of a horizontal exit shall be a space occupied by the same tenant or a public area and each such refuge area shall be adequate to accommodate the original occupant load of the refuge area plus the occupant load anticipated from the adjoining compartment. The anticipated occupant load from the adjoining compartment O Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 10 of 15 shall be based on the capacity of the horizontal exit doors entering the refuge area. The capacity of the refuge area shall be computed based on a net floor area allowance of 3 square feet for each occupant to be accommodated therein. The area into which a horizontal exit leads shall be provided with exits adequate to meet the occupant requirements of this chapter, but not including the added occupant capacity imposed by persons entering it through horizontal exits from another area. At least one refuge area exit shall lead directly to the exterior or to an exit enclosure. Accessible Means of Eqress 1007.1 Accessible means of egress required. Accessible means of egress shall comply with this section. Accessible spaces shall be provided with not less than one accessible means of egress. Where more than one means of egress is required by Section 1015.1 or 1019.1 from any accessible space, each accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two accessible means of egress. 1007.2 Continuity and components. Each required accessible means of egress shall be continuous to a public way and shall consist of one or more of the following components: 1. Accessible routes complying with Section 1104. 2. Stairways within vertical exit enclosures complying with Sections 1007.3 and 1022. 3. Exterior exit stairways complying with Sections 1007.3 and 1026. 4. Elevators complying with Section 1007.4. 6. Horizontal exits complying with Section 1025. 7. Ramps complying with Section 1010. 8. Areas of refuge complying with Section 1007.6. Exceptions: 1. Where the exit discharge is not accessible, an exterior area for assisted rescue must be provided in accordance with Section 1007.7. 1007.2.1 Elevators required. In buildings where a required accessible floor is four or more stories above or below a level of exit discharge, at least one required accessible means of egress shall be an elevator complying with Section 1007.4. Exceptions: 1. In buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the elevator shall not be required on floors provided with a horizontal exit and located at or above the level of exit discharge. With the horizontal exits present in the building, the elevator will not be a required means of egress. 1007.3 Stairways. In order to be considered part of an accessible means of egress, an exit access stairway as permitted by Section 1016.1 or exit stairway shall have a clear width of 48 inches minimum befinreen handrails and shall either incorporate an area of refuge within an enlarged floor-level landing or shall be accessed from either an area of refuge complying with Section 1007.6 or a horizontal exit. Exceptions: 2. The clear width of 48 inches between handrails is not required at exit access stairway as permitted by Section 1016.1 or exit stairways in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 (NFPA 13). 3. Areas of refuge are not required at exit stairways in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 (NFPA 13). 4. The clear width of 48 inches between handrails is not required for exit stairways accessed from a horizontal exit. 7. The areas of refuge are not required in Group R-2 occupancies. No areas of refuge wi/l be required in the project. O Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 1 �J Page 11 of 15 Accessible Route 1104.1 Site arrival points. Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops; accessible parking; accessible passenger loading zones; and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance served. 1104.2 Within a site. At least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, accessible facilities, accessible spaces that have, as the only means of access between them, a vehicular way not providing pedestrian access. 1104.3 Connected spaces. When a building or portion of a building is required to be accessible, an accessible route shall be provided to each portion of the building, to accessible building entrances connecting accessible pedestrian walkways and the public way. 1104.3.1 Employee work areas. Common use circulation paths within employee work areas shall be accessible routes. 1104.4 Multilevel buildings and facilities. At one accessible route shall connect each accessible level, including mezzanines, in multilevel buildings and facilities. 1104.5 Location. Accessible routes shall coincide with or be located in the same area as a general circulation path. Where the circulation path is interior, the accessible route shall also be interior. Accessible Entrances 1105.1 Public entrances. In addition to accessible entrances required by Section 1105.1.1 through 1105.1.6, at least 60 percent of all public entrances shall be accessible. 1105.1.1 Parking garage entrances. Where provided, direct access for pedestrians from parking structures to buildings or facility entrances shall be accessible. 1105.1.3 Restricted entrances. Where restricted entrances are provided to a building or facility, at least one restricted entrance to the building or facility shall be accessible. Accessible Parkinct 1106.1 Required. Where parking is provided, accessible parking spaces shall be provided in compliance with Table 1106.1, except as required by Section 1106.2 through 1106.4. Table 1106.1 Total Parkin S aces Provided Re uired Minimum Number of Accessible S aces 1 to 25 1 26 to 50 2 51 to 75 3 76 to 100 4 101 to 150 5 151 to 200 6 201 to 300 7 301 to 400 8 401 to 500 9 501 to 1,000 2% of total OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 12 of 15 1106.2 Group R-2. At least 2 percent, but not less than one, of each type of parking space provided for occupancy R-2, which are required to have Type A or Type B dwelling units, shall be accessible. Where parking is provided within or beneath a building, accessible parking spaces shall also be provided within or beneath the building. 1106.5 Van Spaces. For every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one shall be a van-accessible parking space. 1106.6 Location. Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible building entrance. Where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located near the accessible entrances. Exceptions: 1. In multilevel parking structures, van-accessible parking spaces are permitted on one level. Dwellinq Units 1107.4 Accessible route. At least one accessible route shall connect accessible building or facility entrances with the primary entrance of each Type A unit and Type B unit within the building or facility and with those exterior and interior spaces and facilities that serve the units.] 1107.6.2.1 Group R-2 Apartment Houses. Type A units and Type B units shall be provided. 1107.6.2.1.1 Type A units. In Group R-2 occupancies containing more than 20 dwelling units, at least 2 percent but not less than one of the units shall be a Type A unit. All R-2 units on a site shall be considered to determine the total number of units and the required number of Type A units. Type A units shall be dispersed among the various classes of units. 1107.6.2.1.2 Type B units. Where there are four or more dwelling units intended to be occupied as a residence in a single structure, every dwelling unit intended to be occupied as a residence shall be a Type B unit. 1017.2 Corridor width. The minimum corridor width shall be as determined in Section 1005.1, but not less than 44 inches. Exceptions: 2. Thirty-six inches (914 mm)—With a required occupant capacity of less than 50. 3. Thirty-six inches (914 mm)—Within a dwelling unit. The Ground Level is classified as a basement. Some areas do not have e/evator service but are provided with an exterior accessible route to the pedestrian entry of the parking garage and the main entry to the clubhouse/leasing area. Fire-resistance of Buildinq Elements Buildin Element Fire-resistance Ratin hours Exterior Walls 1 Fire Walls 3 Fire Barriers – Exit Enclosures 2 Fire Barriers – Trash Rooms 1 Fire Barriers – Occu anc Se arations 1 Fire Partitions – Part Walls 1 Fire Partitions – Corridor Walls 1 Horizontal Assemblies 1 Shafts – More than 3 stories 2 OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 13 of 15 Elevators 708.14 Elevator, dumbwaiter and other hoistways. Elevator, dumbwaiter and other hoistway enclosures shall be constructed in accordance with Section 708 and Chapter 30. 708.14.1 Elevator lobby. An enclosed elevator lobby shall be provided at each floor where an elevator shaft enclosure connects more than three stories. The lobby enclosure shall separate the elevator shaft enclosure doors from each floor by fire partitions. In addition to the requirements in Section 709 for fire partitions, doors protecting openings in the elevator lobby enclosure walls shall also comply with Section 715.4.3 as required for corridor walls and penetrations of the elevator lobby enclosure by ducts and air transfer openings shall be protected as required for corridors in accordance with Section 716.5.4.1. Elevator lobbies shall have at least one means of egress complying with Chapter 10 and other provisions within this code. Exceptions: 4. Enclosed elevator lobbies are not required where the building is protected by an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2. Stairwavs 1009.1 Stairway width. The width of stairways shall be determined as specified in Section 1005.1, but such width shall not be less than 44 inches. See Section 1007.3 for accessible means of egress stairways. Exceptions: 1. Stairways serving an occupant load of less than 50 shall have a width of not less than 36 inches. 1009.2 Headroom. Stairways shall have a minimum headroom clearance of 80 inches measured vertically from a line connecting the edge of the nosings. Such headroom shall be continuous above the stairway to the point where the line intersects the landing below, one tread depth beyond the bottom riser. The minimum clearance shall be maintained the full width of the stairway and landing. 1009.4 Stair treads and risers. Stair riser heights shall comply with Sections 1009.4.1 through 1009.4.5. 1009.4.2 Stair riser heights shall be 7 inches maximum and 4 inches minimum. Stair tread depths shall be 11 inches minimum. The riser height shall be measured vertically between the leading edges of adjacent treads. Rectangular tread depths shall be 11 inches minimum measured horizontally between the vertical planes of the foremost projection of adjacent treads and at a right angle to the tread's leading edge. Winder treads shall have a minimum tread depth of 11 inches measured between the vertical planes of the foremost projection of adjacent treads at the intersections with the walkline and a minimum tread depth of 10 inches within the clear width of the stair. Exceptions: 4. Within dwelling units in Group R-2 occupancies; the maximum riser height shall be 7.75 inches; the minimum tread depth shall be 10 inches; the minimum winder tread depth at the walk line shall be 10 inches; and the minimum winder tread depth shall be 6 inches. A nosing not less than 0.75 inch but not more than 1.25 inches shall be provided on stairways with solid risers where the tread depth is less than 11 inches. 1009.5 Stairway landings. There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. The width of landings shall not be less than the width of stairways they serve. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension measured in the direction of travel equal to the width of the stairway. Such dimension need not exceed 48 inches where the stairway has a straight run. Doors opening onto a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one-half the required width. When fully open, the door shall not project more than 7 inches into a fanding. O Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 Page 14 of 15 1009.7 Vertical rise. A flight of stairs shall not have a vertical rise greater than 12 feet between floor levels or landings. 1009.12 Handrails. Stairways shall have handrails on each side and shall comply with Section 1012. Exceptions: 2. Stairways within dwelling units are permitted to have a handrail on one side only. 3. Decks, patios and walkways that have a single change in elevation where the landing depth on each side of the change of elevation is greater than what is required for a landing do not require handrails. 5. Changes in room elevations of only one riser within dwelting units in Group R-2 occupancies do not require handrails. Concealed Spaces 717.3.2 Groups R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4. Draftstopping shall be provided in floor/ceiling spaces in Group R-2 buildings with three or more dwelling units. Draftstopping shall be located above and in line with the dwelling unit separations. Exceptions: 1. Draftstopping is not required in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 (NFPA 13). There will be no draftstopping in the floor/ceiling spaces. 717.4.2 Groups R-1 and R-2. Draftstopping shall be provided in attics, mansards, overhangs or other concealed roof spaces of Group R-2 buildings with three or more dwelling units. Draftstopping shall be installed above, and in line with, dwelling unit separation walls that do not extend to the underside of the roof sheathing above. Exceptions: 2. Draftstopping is not required in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 (NFPA 13). There will be no draftstopping in the attics. LOCAL AMENDMENTS SECTION 1503.7 — SNOWGUARDS / RETENTION: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: The design of snow retention devices / snow guards shall be designed by a licensed structural engineer or as determined by the Building Official. Roof overhangs will be snow-melted. Is this still required? SECTION 1510.7 - SNOW RETENTION. This section is hereby amended to add the following language: Roofs shall be designed to prevent accumulation of snow from shedding onto exterior balconies, decks, pedestrian and vehicular exits from buildings, stairways, sidewalks, streets, alleys, areas directly above or in front of gas and electrical utility meters, or adjacent properties. The design of snow retention devices shall be provided by a licensed structural engineer or as determined by the Building Official. Exception: Roof areas with a horizontal dimension of no more than 48 inches that will not receive snow shedding from a higher roof are exempt from the requirement of design by a licensed structural engineer. The horizontal projection shall be measured perpendicular to the exterior wall line from the edge of the roof or eave to any intersecting vertical surface. SECTION 1603.2 - BOULDER WALLS: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: Boulder walls (rock walls) four feet and taller shall be designed by an engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. O Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 � Page 15 of 15 SECTION 1604.1.1 - HAZARD AREA REQUIREMENTS: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: All new structures and additions to existing structures located in mapped debris flow, rock fall, avalanche and flood hazards shall be designed in compliance with Hazard Regulations within Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code. SECTION 1607.7.1 - HANDRAILS AND GUARDS: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: Maximum guardrail deflection shall be L/ 180 between supports. SECTION 1608.2 - GROUND SNOW LOADS: This section shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the foliowing language: Designs for roof snow loads shall be as follows: Roof pitches of less than 4:12 shall be designed to carry a 100 pound per square foot snow load and roof pitches of 4:12 and greater shall be designed to carry an 80 pound per square foot snow load. There is no allowance for pitch reduction nor is there a requirement to increase loading due to wind, valleys, snow drifting or type of roof covering. Any modification for snow load design shall be accomplished using section 1604.1. SECTION 1608.2.1 - ALTERNATIVE ROOFS: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: Alternative roofs shall be designed to carry a roof snow load resulting from a ground snow load of 143 pounds per square foot. All provisions of section 1608 shall apply to the analysis of the roof structure except for reductions for unobstructed slippery surfaces. The Engineer of Record is responsible for determining increased localized snow loading due to architectural building features. SECTION 1803.2.1 - SOILS REPORT: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: Site specific soils and foundation investigation reports shall be prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer for the completion of construction documents. Assumption and "open hole" investigations are allowed for additions to an existing building of less than 2,000 square feet of floor area. SECTION 2301.2 - GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: This section is hereby amended to add the following language: Item # 5: Stress increases shall not be permitted for snow load duration. TABLE 2902.1 - MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES: This Table is hereby amended as follows: 1. Footnote f is amended as follows: Drinking fountains are not required for an occupant load of 100 or less, or in A-2, B, or M occupancies, regardless of occupant load. 2. Footnote g is hereby added to read: Service Sinks are recommended, but not required in B or M occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or less if a lavatory is provided. OO Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. 2/17/2010 SEGMENT 2 HFIGHT =< R5 FFFT AS AI LOWED BY CODE TERRACED BUILDING SECTION GRADE PLANE � �r SEGMENT 2 HEIGHT =< 85 FEET AS ALLOWED BY CODE FIVE STORIES TERRACED BUILDING SECTION � � � . . ¢ w : \ `�, us E"�'`��'"" 4 :�, . t� � � � \ U \ m � � 2 OR� . � � � � I Z � � E � YYY. \ v � :'. } i E ( • �� i �� 10 ,\-- ; _ ; ; ; i � u � 1 +' � ; � o , � � i ��, �� K. * � i , � za r: �' : . d' . � *n � m '�. 6 : .12' ' 4 b � � 1 �' z q,m a 1 _`I_� .} � . 1, , � .� ^ ' + .__.�. �� i'� ... _EA ENT �o ° ir ��. � � ..'�� ' � c� � � � . � ° + p 2* : �o:it'�'o . . et � t+ J � O�r �f'1 �� — � ` � _ `2 > > � .. t lp,� ,.q� � rn � i cn�c'e?? _ j ? '� � � � � � � -°{ I�- i � a < �_ ;; �-� � � 1 �� ' � rn �8,; `;"r ; '��a i . '( �q w �t . «. '� < � � <y 3 I �. i . � m � —R�.t : ,�,.. � � �+ . 5 I 4 L� W � t A � ( ;�s .k � ' _.� ., s ., i �� 4 , E � ."�" �� i_.v. � .:.� c, ~` : . 'c'Q>°�! i 1 �� s � � . .. ` 3 j��p,i �. j f ' , k'd=�o '°�` ! , � � � w � ,, 'j ' °mva�a; � , 1 � ; � � �[�' � t i �n � �,� w- ° ., . ? f = t ' t U p�j ��.. � (L+ �Ary � ��L . F t C . , ? � u�+�caa i i 20% - # � k��W ` 0. � � , � t , ` \ � c� 3 S � ' " ` � --�-� sz� , r ° Z r f . _ � p .. � t > -_ i i r5 �, �` �,*-=� ` t. �, . ��c� � € ,�q ' 1 ` . � t 't � � , . � �. _ � . ��; � .:, � :: ' . _ � ` 1 . ; : . i � ' . ' ..�. ,� . p : ��. _ i '�. r F _ # M Y - •".,.�j.x,� ' 3 ! 3 � ; . . : ; .- e w.,,.y. . �,"`�,,,.,,ti ;. . .. _. _.._.. � ._._. 1 _ ,�_...._ ..._ � .e< � ... '. � � . .. � � � . � .... :� .. ,.. . t . { � ��,._-......��__. _ . . �, . .,,, . � ,..... , .... _ . ..._ , ',. } � -. � . .,�� . _x ... ....".._.. ., _ . 4 , ... � . _! ..,. . � `' a � y ,�:� .... ._ ._ _._.... W ,. _., ��.. . .,. � .. - . .. �� " . . . , . »�� -.'� !(� "°` f : ,�. , ncr�+. _ ` ' �� .: . . � y� �� , .., � ( , � � _ _ . ' , ' . _ .xa . k .Y* _.. ' _.. , � �: . M ' f �_.. _. . .. ..._:- .: -+ . -- a . _"" ;. e � * L ,. { � .. . � : , �:. § ,�. ..ro.. :. �� ,.w,q1 .._.. � � . ` . { ---'!-- .. ...� � . ....., . i : � . �: i . � � . x },_'*� `.r v +v:..,.. '� a�. �, _ . . � 4Y t � ,7' , t t . ; . � �g a� '� Q o :� . € ..__ . ,.,.'"" _ , � 6 sc 1'�` [[`' � � � t t i �� . � � �,'� < ! � "' s � � + � . �� '�� I , ,: � ° . M O ' � � �.. "k ; f . � ' . ... ` �-- . , . ! f . , ( �p ry�^ oDm ,/ ° � . .. . � � MSC�`! �m.a_n �4 (—' .f �' .. ..� � .:. , 4 . W ��.: i .. � ��i , F t { � . � _ „r. �- � �, �' ,�. �q � 3 w 03 4 1 ,� �o�'. r �a.� �: c.. �, ..F, ,� c '. �\ � . . , . . � i o � � � . 3 3 O m . � ,. 'r: 1 � � .. `� ...� �` � �... �. 4,� � �2.5 �' � o, '. �m � o .^' _`. .. ` -d�yy�'_'_ ::___ � �c. `T _.. -...--. ' _ ___ - ...._ , _ '�` i` . "' . n. � �N� � z�Y p ' ��. L--�-�- � °; �� °, � m � �,h J o � �\ m M � � �F, � � �� , p� -- �� ' . � ' a � � ' 3 � � � i � . � , .. � ` � , � i : . '� 1� � i . � y � r � :..) _C.. _ _.. �. ._ • '�' PROPOSED � � � ,� 11 . _ _ `� � � ; ' .. � *� � : � - : � . �. I�a ��.. : ' ,�. � , t � �� PR�ERTY LINE c23 ° \ i � j . � � � ( � � '� ,� � � `� � � ( - , ,j i � � m % �' , ° �, , � t. . ` \ �. � . /'� /a. „ �, ; � , — , .n ' � a _ . � ' 1 ;�^�`.. . �.. , ., � _ � �. � � Q. � '. � ., . � 1 � � . 3 � �.� �I "' ar r''� "' o , `,� . - 1 ._ � ` ."„$B : = ° � � O � i :� ' mco mm �� '�.. � � �� ... - It it U � .- '��- � �`5. � . � k ` � j � � �l�. i . :ERTY �t{M� � o w p � ;;. . �°- . . _ ��..: , �, � ( cy ..L'%:::.. . i _. �m ��ow ". t � � i � " _ ,. --� -�.�..._� m, , ,.� ; � i m r,. .W.._ , ,. — ,��---�"-,--,. .�.__ k .� � ; ,{ { ,.� � ... . �u ` * �r�n �o � -.. J �) . � �,.> - . . � o; � m � _ _..) � � � o �t : �ro �� ' � z�� ` � ------ I i . j . . �°v A� ow Y ` t . � LL "'�'mu �i � � '�. . � am ~m DCJ78 a �w�= �� 4 , +i � . � z � � c' � 1 ., 809? � { ;�� 's +�ry U : WUp� � ' . � ry S o .Oa �y � . �I � �;��p � . . nc*v . �4 �� QQ� �{ i i , � � � a� { bW , � . .. .... .. .. . ... 'I��, .� : 3��.�, �l ; .. "`�,.� .... a " ��` � � � ':'�f � '��. . .._ . . �� ..`_._ ��..._ .... ' - � � � � � � D P�A� 1 1 ��i� � T(�1111�' (� �= \!,A [ March 8, 2010 Mr. George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail Re: Timber Ridge Redevelopment Response to Final Comments Dear George, We have the following responses to the final comments. Communitv Development Department Topographic Survey containing the following information: �ey, wt�orr nave indicated that info ;tem (r) is still in progress. Based upon conversations with utility companies, I would suggest having the services and meters located for JUST the clubhouse and buildings J&K, which are 1) the buildings to remain that we nee�' t^ ��rn+^-�} the utilitv services 2) are on the border of construction where they are at ri��; a. Wet stamp and signature of a licensed surveyor b. Date of survey c. North arrow and graphic bar scale d. Scale of 1"=10' or 1"=20') e. Legal description and physical address f. Lot size and buildable area (buildable area excludes red hazard avalanche, slopes greater than 40%, and floodplain) g. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information must be clearly stated on the survey h. Property boundaries to the nearest hundredth (.01) of a foot accuracy. Distances and bearings and a basis of bearing must be shown. Show existing pins or monuments found and their relationship to the established corner. i. Show right of way and property lines; including bearings, distances and curve information. j. Indicate all easements identified on the subdivision plat and recorded against the property as indicated in the title report. List any easement restrictions. � 2 3. k. Spot Elevations at the edge of asphalt, along the street frontage of the property at twenty-five foot intervals (25'), and a minimum of one spot elevations on either side of the lot. I. Topographic conditions at two foot contour intervals m. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a point one foot above grade. n. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittent streams, etc.). o. All existing improvements (including foundation walls, roof overhangs, building overhangs, etc.). p. Environmental Hazards (ie. rockfall, debris flow, avalanche, wetlands, floodplain, soils) q. Watercourse setbacks, if applicable (show centerline and edge of stream or creek in addition to the required stream or creak setback) r. Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals on site or in the right-of-way adjacent to the site. Exact location of existing utility sources and proposed service lines from their source to the structure. Utilities to include: Cable TV Sewer Gas Telephone Water Electric s. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales, etc. t. Adjacent roadways labeled and edge of asphalt for both sides of the roadway shown for a minimum of 250' in either direction from property. Architectural Site Plan a. Please provide proposed roof ridge elevations. Indicate existing and proposed grades underneath all roof lines. This information will be used to calculate building height. _ � . _ _ W,.. ,. „U..� :�� '�,._� .�. � �.,� r��L _ . b. Please provide a PE stamped Erosion Control Plan. : _.. ;��i� 4t.,�: be ... _ � u.sr... _._„ Landscape Plan a. Please provide a detailed legend, listing the type and size (caliper for deciduous trees, height for coniferous trees and gallon size for shrubs) of all the proposed plant materials. A variation in tree heights and sizes is recommended. The tree heights and sizes should be proportionate to the scale, bulk and mass of the proposed buildings. b. Some species of plant materials (Honey locust) shown may conflict with Vail's climate/environment. See recommended plant list for more information. c. Please note temporary and permanent landscape irrigation systems d. Show all existing and proposed retaining walls with top of wall and bottom of wall elevations. _ ,.vv,�.u�.�. _. � � ... . �� ., � �. � ��ans C�.. ., :�r�u �nd BEW ��,.��. , �: .;v��, ,v<;� 3 �.�� i�v�� :.�:�: �v'e are � �� _� remain. e. Minimum size of coniferous trees is 6 feet in height- please note height of proposed coniferous trees. Variation in height is recommended. f. The trees proposed on north side of parking structure appear to be planted in 2 feet of topsoil above structural foam. Please revise the plan set accordingly. �< <� �,��c � u°�a;�� :�e .. .,.. � ..... :.......... �.. . � ..,.� , .. . , -,., ��.. .....u�G�ic. _ _..... -.5: i�LV �Ci< <iZ�. .�.>`r� g. Please provide more detail on the plant material proposed on the top deck of the parking structure. Please include information on how the trees are planted ie, planter boxes, depth of soil, etc.). , N �,_< .�. . „� ,.� .w�, _. ; �,,,� y_ � 3...�. ; �.. ��i iii, 1 :, v ��—' v c.ic�rt .1, .i sC ci� a Z:. 4. Lighting Plan ,. �.�.;� r.. � design process the exact type, location, and number of ,. _. ,. rm. The type, location and number of fixtures will be provided prior to Final �.►� Design review hearing. Cut sheets and manufacturer information will be provided that 2 �... ,__., ,-. ,� f;�! �,;t_�� -��si�� A�4 � r"+�nn �^!i!I c�r�plv with Section 14-10-7 of the �... �� T��, a. Please indicate the type, location and number of all exterior lighting fixtures.' b. Please provide cut sheets for cylinder (wall sconces) and coach lights c. Please provide more detail from the manufacturer's spec sheets regarding whether the proposed exterior lights are fully cut off fi�ures. d. Please demonstrate compliance with the town's adopted outdoor lighting regulations 5. Color and Material Board a. Please submit an exterior color and materials sample board for review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review Board. �_ "�esign review 6. Model v_, ¢. . _ �. � .�� _ , .� ,, _. _ . ,. w;� U ,r;, �, r�,rE �u.�� ., a. Please provide a three dimensional computer generated model which includes a sun/shade analysis. b. Please depict all deciduous and coniferous trees after ten years of growth 7. Please provide a fully executed utility providers approval and verification form. 8. Hazard Study; a. A rockfall mitigation improvements plan will be required based on the study and Town Code. , _ �: , � .. � �, , . � Fire Department 1. Please provide dimensions of the turning radius of the proposed bus lanes and fire apparatus. � 3 4 vve used auioturn to check bus movements: 40 foot bus, 45.6 outside swept path, 38' centerline radius, 24'inside swept path. Width, tracking, steering angle, etc. is shown on the autoturn diagram on CO.A1 Fire Trucks: Fire truck movements are shown on COA.2 for the main/garage entry fire lane. The Eastern and Western exits are ALMOST straight (almost no turning) so we dint think we needed to show the radii. As discussed with Mike McGee (week of March 1-5), he is ok with one exiting truck movement (EB fire lane to WB frontage) encroaching slightly into the opposing left turn �reed to narrc- . east and west exits et minimum). Mike ag�-eec; ' E ,a,.. Firn �C:C rrlt��t�C: � .!"U�� j+�C�1';lC� �!"G.'� . _ � . v . ,., . . .. < <-,.. : . - 1 t^ _ , . Please identify the "gate or bollards" at the entrance/exit to the proposed 20 foot wide fire lane. ,v .�:U;,�.,..��. ., ,,.., .as.,.:��, ��u �. ; ,c;��,s �,� �.,., %=,�ra:�r;��; .��L �,,� :�c.a.::�y �.;�;ar��. Please clearly delineate the common path of egress to the public way on the proposed site plan. . ., , _ � � . .. � _ . ..a� w �,. . .�. . v.. : �t �, �a r�t_. �.� Please provide a Life Safety Report and the Code Analysis. �equested information is Public Works Department The comments written in bold text are additions added to the previous list prior to the applicant. 2. The Town of Vail General Notes shall be updated to reflect the most current notes. There � are a few missing from this set shown on the Title Sheet. Complete, other than filling out � the Survey benchmark data. �vcn�: �e� �er�+ �ot� �31 per �, t= ��v�; � 0 4::� rr�,m Go�-e 3. Please provide a stamped survey of the site within the Building Permit set. Additional spot elevations will be needed in the office surrounding area and buildings J and K in the areas that may be affected. See community Development Department comments above. 4. Show the newly installed sidewalk at the west end of the project as existing, not proposed, this shall be included in the existing survey conditions. 5. Transit Area; a. Show all bus turning movements confirming four buses can effectively operate independently and six buses can be stacked end to end. Exiting turning movements are shown. However, please show entering movements as well to confirm four of the bus stalls work completely independently. ., �.. _, � � �. _ _ , ....�. �,. �� , ,� ,,�� .,� �� , arkeu �us, an� then parking. 4 buses can operate Semi independently: they will need to SHARE the center passing lane. If each bus direction needs it's own passing lane, the office will have to go, but still might NOT be possible due to GRADING requirements. I haven't - �i° 1' fi ��i� �"`t �y six ��,s�s � ' " �:.` �,. end. _ ......_.�.,,. _ �. ... .�N. _�, , . ��..,.,a'SU :-a� . r .,+i Ici 4� �cds's i�'.�i�.,.� �i V b. Show bus entry turning movements. Can the main entrance curb return be reduced in size? �,;�,�; .,,.;�w=�r; �us ��,�ird� ar�� ;�r� :: uv� �.�t:�vements, which does not allow the entry to u� �e�uc;�u uvithout buses encrcachir,g E��t� �pposing traffic. c. Show shelters for both WB and EB directions ,., t. ..z�,_ _ � `�� . . _�,__. d. The bike path shall be separate from the transit walk to minimize conflicts. �one. e. Show grading/walls, as necessary, on the west end of the transit loop and up to the "new parking" area west of the clubhouse. �?��,r� f. Show a connection along the north side of the transit loop (w/ stairs as needed) to a crosswalk across the drive entrance to just south of the club entrance. �� , _ �, . . _. _.. ... .� �.,., . .�� , ,u v.,,,,,��c� �a�x c�..,, .., _. . - � . � � �, �.�� c��v� .� ,� _� ��otings). 6. West entrance area/parking; a. Please show crosswalks at drive entrance. �� =�e. b. Extend a walk north from the fire lane/bike path along the east N-S curb line of the entrance. This walk shall lead to the crosswalk/parking/stairwell to club entrance level. c. Where does the inlet at the SE corner of the clubhouse connect to/ Complete. d. There should be a stair access to the parking at the entrance to the club. Complete. e. The minimum clearance between the wall and the club columns should be at least 5', and even that is tight for this public space. Complete. f. The drive lane should be shifted south after the curve as it enters the east existing housing to eliminate the loss of parking on the north side. .: -- u��° �v ��a� „;�� r _ _ ... .. . ., ., , __ .. .. . ..., . � ,_,..,�. ,. , � ��,.,j , _....,.. ._, ..�, �.,., ..�;u'v,�f�l- g. The "new parking" area should be maximized at this time. Looks like we may be able to add 2-3 more spaces. Complete. h. The 8 spaces and trash area seems to be a very expensive excavation with 18'-36' walls. Can the spaces be relocated elsewhere and the trash moved well forward as well to save the cost of all the retaining and leave this area alone? Complete. i. The Town will need to understand how this redeveloped access point will/may effect development potential of the western portion of the site. '�u �N�:��c _��. , vspons�� j. The relocated ADA parking space is in a poor location. It conflicts with the Transit Area and is too close to the Frontage Rd. intersection. No Parking shall occur within the Transit Area and Transit intersections. . . . v �. � _ _. .., y .,,- �� , ..�. 7. Fire Lane/Bike Path Areas; a. The fire lane/bike path connection to the entrance drive should feel pedestrianized. Do not provide curb returns. Provide a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp. And discuss with fire if this can be necked down to 10'-12' for a very short section to prevent cars from entering upon the bike path. _., �..�. ,.:�s� �, t; ...,�� .� :�e �3; ��;r� 1 ..., _ . ,_. . ,. �� _ �. � ��..,;�;.- _�. b. Both access points on the E and W ends are to be exit only for emergency vehicles and that emergency vehicles access the lane by the main garage access point. Please show fire truck turning movements. �hese ar� ,u=.�rrently : ,�w F ,., � � . ..,, �... �v .:i.l.+ l. ,.,�. ....�.�.?'+.i�i. `.,_�.... .::�.... c. The lane on the west half could be sloped to toward the road easily and sheet flow across the grass slope down to the Frontage Rd curb. The east side could also be raised more quickly from the west entrance at a�4% slope to help eliminate grade difference between the lane and the buildings. Complete. d. The very west end should have an ADA connection to the Fire Lane/Ped Path to provide access to the Lane and across to the Transit area. Complete, though still need ADA cross walk to both EB and WB Transit Area. .. _ e. The east half of the lane could also sheet flow to the south and into the proposed storm sewer between the S. Frontage Rd and the Lane. Complete. f. The east half could also be brought up quicker to match building FF elevations rather than have stairs. Complete. g. The east connection to the Frontage Road cannot occur as drawn, this will be easily considered as an access point. The connection should be made with the existing bike path and with a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp. Keeping it 10' 12' for a short section will also be helpful. The entrance has been improved, but now it crosses the Savoy Villas property and can it be narrowed and a mountable curb/ADA compliant ramp be added. .i it out _ c&g, h. The Frontage Rd. curb shall be wrapped around into the Savoy Villas entrance to the new fire lane/bike path connection. This has been modified, but still needs mountable curb. Does the Savoy Villas driveway need to be widened? �-` F� U��.��y � �. ,�,�s. i. Fire staging areas have been added. Do these widened areas have to be paved or just flat? And if they need to be hard surface can this be a different material/texture from the bike lane. =rR� ;� -j ��! �b��€u j. A widened area has also been shown for trash. Can trash share the fire/bike lane. This area is getting very wide. How can we control private vehicles from driving down this way? At a minimum, a mountable curb should be included as a deterrant. _,, �__ , .,. . , . _,.. . ;��. 8. Engineered analysis on the existing condition of the gabion walls to remain will be required, details on how to connect to existing gabion walls and how to build walls beneath the existing gabion walls will be required, as well as construction shoring plans showing no impact to the adjacent properties. T Ert� . eas� �r ,�.,, to obtain this information, which is still pending. It is unclear how rockfall mitigation will ... . ` _ :ssue. 9. Frontage Road; L� �« a preliminary A/D lane layout plan. Per the traffic consultant, the south white edge iine should be continuous. A variance for a narrower paved shoulder (to be consistent with the REST of the south frontage road, or widening the shoulder thru TR may be required. I submitted your comments to Curtis Rowe (K-H) re: transition criteria, etc. It doe� �o b� �'' �T access Code Requirements for a 35 mph r�� 3- two just on this? a. A CDOT access permit approval shall be required. b. Full CDOT frontage Rd design plans will be required as a part of this project c. A full width overlay will be required as a part of this project for the limits of the Frontage Rd improvements. d. Tapers and decel lengths shall match traffic study recommendations. 190' left turn lane with 10:1 taper and 20:1 lane shift tapers. �� . ��s.._3 ��.� �,:��rr �, . . � .. :��,�.� ,:�. ��;,�.�.:. e. Can any widening be done to the south, maybe part or all of the south shoulder? 10. Accommodations for a bus stop on LRL should be made where the grade meets the road with fill against the parking structure. This could alleviate congestion at the Transit area and function for the eastern half of the project. 11. Drainage; , :<�!"�:i,: a. Provide a Drainage Report b. The Town does not require detention for developed sites, unless there is a significant increase in water run-off and existing storm sewer cannot handle the anticipated flow, in which case the existing system should be upsized or detention can be considered. c. We do require all surface and structured parking drainage to run thru Water Quality (which is shown) d. Identify which storm sewers take public water run-off and provide adequate easements thru the site. A preliminary easement plan has been provided. e. Does the 18" pipe on the NE corner of the parking structure flow over a 10+' retaining wall? This will need to be piped. Complete. f. In the same area as above an existing storm sewer crosses Lions Ridge Loop, where is that water proposed to go. �.;e � e-_. � _ _. _, e.r .. N E .� �, , .� _, � �.. vs�ns�-;�� . .., �� eas:. t �=�:r� t; �Es ��c��; � �:� �v e�ier� �ir��. g. Provide storm sewer profiles. ,... „ . 12. Utilities; a. Utility sign offs will be required on the title sheet. ,� �. . ,._ � >v.�ti'�, , ��. ,�� ..3 � . .�. .w _:�� -;� ,. b. The option to minimize the utility easement to 30' is shown, is this going to be considered? The current plan does not seem to need that additional room. This idea was brought up to help the building move forward (south) 10' to help the retaining wall grading issue in the back and/or for additional landscaping in the back. Complete. Not requesting a change to existing easement. c. The idea of `meandering' the fire lane/ped path is great, however locating significant landscaping (trees) will not be allowed over utilities. If it is determined to 'meander' the lane, show how the utilities will be protected. 0 � We moved the Proposed Electric to be under the new fire lane. Other than that, there �� e a few � : utilities : in an area not under hardscape. We ��,; �,r-� ;tilities to be aware of. d. The depth of the existing water line is needed. ,:� �,, � c� �w. I expect that we might need to �� deepen the water line in the same �.�.,�. r w_. ;w= _. .. _ e. All necessary additional easements for utilities will be required. A preliminary easement plan has been provided f. How will existing utility services be maintained thru construction?" �d be a - .;� with no down times for C�nivt tiUii'u�� rvJJ ��:v � Gi I IGii �j (Jeffi �s �� ., VC; �..j-� j v. vJ::l Qwest (Sam Tooley) thinks the existing office should be reviewed (have bldg services located prior to const) but that other existing buildings to remain are on a different loop, and it should also be " clean", not a problem. Water and Sewer: It is expected that the existing OFFICE building water and sewer service will be disrupted when the transit station is constructed. Gas: Not currently provided on site. g. Show the existing sewer/water services to the buildings to remain. Will any utility services be required to be relocated? _,. � _� th� ofr�ce. 13. Please provide a Landscape plan. Sight distance and Utility conflicts will be a key issue. And any landscape in CDOT ROW will require a CDOT landscape permit. Provide a more detailed plan and show sight distance and avoidance of utility conflicts. 14. Please provide a lighting plan. How will the project, transit area, Frontage Rd, fire lane/bike path be lit?. A preliminary lighting plan layout has been provided show lighting type, fixtures, power source, dimension spacing. The Frontage Road lighting should match the pending Frontage Rd. Lighting Master Plan. =��.�: 15. Building; a. The Environmental Impact Report indicates that the population of this new development will be �552-570 individuals housed in 352 units as compared to �424 in 106 individuals housed in 106 units today. The existing calculation is based on 106 2 bedroom units with 4 persons per unit. What is the developed population based on? The current 352- unit count contains 544 bedrooms, at 2 persons per bedroom, the resulting population would be 1088 individuals. Please clarify the proposed population and please clarify whether there are 102 vs 106 units being removed. b. The circulation for the storage/trash/mail room seems to be inadequate. At a minimum short term parking spaces need to be assigned in this area. The Traffic study indicates approximately 30 vehicles will be entering and 50 vehicles will be exiting during a peak hour. Some percentage of those trips will want to stop in this area, and need accommodations to do so. Moving the access west may help with circulation. This may be done by swapping unit location. .. t_.�, _.�:�t i�� .�. �� ;�= .�:��"�: �v �h� =t.� �:r�n. c. The trash circulation and locations seem inadequate for this large of a development. Having only one point to dump trash and only accessible from inside the parking structure is inadequate. Having a trash chute on both sides of the parking structure (E&W) and accessible from inside the building along with one on the very far west and � east side of the building seems more accessible. The Trash plan has been modified 7 but does not address the above comment. Please provide written narrative of trash plan. � � . . . . _ d. The trash chute should also be coupled with a recycle area/chute. w. .. e. How will the Bike storage areas be secure/controlled/accessed? How many bikes will it hold? 76 bikes are being proposed, with no storage on the 4t'' and 5t'' floor. That is approximately 1 bike per 7 bedrooms, is this reasonable? Why no storage on 4tn and 5th floors? w,� .. � _ v.,. F._ �� :;f f. Is the storage area secured by a gate/door? A door is shown. g. An emergency/service access from the top deck would be very functional for service and an emergency/secondary access to this large of a structure. w_, v�. �, ;wUs v� �:; �°� .. , _._ _ . ., _ . � �. .. � ,. h. Show typical dimensions for parking spaces/drive lanes etc... These will have to meet Town code. All exposed surface spaces are 9x19 and garaged/covered are 9x18. Cross-over aisles are supposed to be 30'. �`ros �irrently 24 feet. Tne �:�� :odate a 30-foot aisle i. Show elevations for parking garage. Complete. j. There are walks shown at the entrance at the parking garage, are these raised or at grade. Complete. K Please show drainage for the parking structure. Where will it tie into the sanitary sewer (this will require ERWSD approval). G : tre �rfcove will tie in"to t� �e �� - -: �e=. �� will tie in�o tf � .y sewer after �;� s; �, : .� �.` � . .. . �... �` ,,:��v`i r� �u�u�.. t:J . .v'ofS A�.? n�. I. Show Snow storage calculations. Complete. Where will the top deck snow storage go? V ,� :;ver ±hv the _ ��,�n.,� . i, �:.� _ �: �,�. m. Where do the roof drains daylight or connect to the storm sewer? i he roof drains will tie �.Y.. � _.,� �� A�� 6P, .�� Fg _ _. _ : � u. � _ _ � ... , , . _, _. ,. _ ... .� . .� .v , . n. Generic grading is provided in the courtyards. Provide specific design, hardscape, ped paths, landscape etc... � � .,�. �;�� . o. Does the dumpster meet Town bear proof enclosure requirements? Complete. p. Some of the units on the ground floor are only accessible from the outside and not the garage without going up one floor to then back down. Should there be an interior corridor to access these units and also the elevator tower? - .� ,._ _.. , l �:T q. The upper levels do not match with the garage floor plate so there is ramping and stairs to each IeveL _ r. Multiple garage levels show stairwell exits that go no where, what is the intent? Complete. s. The 4th and 5th floor garage level plans show a different entrance into the buildings on the east side? Why the difference? Tthe 5th floor does not show an access door for the east side of the garage to the building. Elevations that are now shown provide the answer. t. The plans reference Garage Plans by others. When will they be provided? �t �rtv :ir��e 16. Easements shall be provided for drainage, the fire/bike path, access to the west existing property, transit area and rockfall mitigation fence 17. The Developer shall be responsible for plowing the fire lane. : 18. Traffic Study; - .� ,,�, w ._ v� .... , v .� �,��vL. �, ..,�� ,.�� . �� ;.�, ��: �_ .��-E �:�,�, , a. The Traffic study will need to be updated, once the final program in the development is determined. b. Note on the Traffic generation summary that the 171 units is based on occupancy not capacity. c. The traffic engineer should comment on the circulation issue as stated above regarding the mailroom/storage/trash area. 19. Transit projections; a. A more specific Town bus impact analysis should be made. As indicated in the Traffic study the Town's bus headways will probably not change as much as suggested, although shadow buses will increase and this will impact number of buses, operations, maintenance of buses. This will also provide a bigger incentive to construct Simba Run underpass and the need for a line haul route at faster headways at peak times. b. The project removes 106 units roughly equivalent to a maximum of 424 people. The new development provides 352 units roughly equivalent to 1088 people(This assumes 2 per bedroom). The increase of people on this site is �260%. The existing peak ped. counts using transit (based on counts on 12/30/09) was 112, which was based on �86% occupancy rate. So at full occupancy this could have been 130 people. An increase of 260% would then result in a transit ped need of 338 at full occupancy, 2 per bedroom. If the LRL bus stop was installed and 10% of the transit use went there, then the Frontage Rd. Transit Area would need to carry 305 people in an hour. The existing bus at peak times currently arrives 2/3rds full with a total capacity of about 50. A shadow bus typically follows this bus once it arrives at Timber Ridge to allow for an additional capacity of 50. Additional analysis will be required to understand the true impact to the Town bus system, regarding operations, maintenance, new buses, new positions, etc... c. This additional need would have to be covered by the Red and Green routes today, but could be supplemented by a new Line Haul route in the future if the Simba Run underpass were built. d. In addition, there is currently a safety hazard with pedestrians crossing the interstate at this location in order to short cut travel to the Cascade employment center/lift access. This is likely to increase due to almost 3x the pedestrian population as there is now. A Simba Run underpass would help alleviate this concern, although probably not eliminate the problem. To eliminate the problem adequate pedestrian barriers would need to be installed to divert all people away from crossing the interstate. 20. The development will require a public art component. Again, once you have had an opportunity to review the list of comments please contact me so that we may set up a mutually convenient time to meet and discussion the information contained within the letter. You can reach me most easily by telephone at (970) 376-2675 or by e-mail at qruther(a�vailqov.com Sincerely, George Ruther, AICP Director of Community Development Town of Vail � xc: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer 0 . Mike McGee, Fire Marshall Greg Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation � l.J H/Glenn/VailTimberRidgeTOVcommentsMarch2010.doc (Alpine) 10 � � � 0 � . ,..� � � T . .. ...._� �� !, r� � +� 1 `�� V' j.... � � � '�-- (� 4 � � i i i 1 Q.1 ^ i I � � z � , 4 r � . . ._ _ � j � � : �`, j . —_� � ��.: :.� •, � ' � . � t � . . r ��. ___�. , __. � �. � �� _ ;, � � � � �� ,_ s - � j � , � � , � o �_�_,�-� � � � , "` � i � � � � ,� � -� � �. -- ; Q � � - s Q f � � ., �' , 2.0�% 1___ "T b ' o- , 7 cb t I t�i+ � .__-- � � c�v♦..--�-.__---� - rn , . - rn ' '�, , ,� , , � �� , � °� � � � , � � � � �- aa �. _ _ .�� ,� � � , � � �. . � � � +� � � m � � �' j , j,' � � � ,� t � ,,,, b� , i # c� "''+ � ; / M � M , o � ..4 I �F � � i i O ' - � � , �- �, i_� �,.. �� .�- � p �, � , � � uj # M � � . (D + `,,,�,� , � � �� ' � � � �� `��.� N� � p'�, � � �� M . . k _ _ � �� p� '"� E y i� 3 , ; � � i ,�.; �z � p, �� ' � � � ,.?� a�}� � � � � L Z o � � ( a�, �`3^ � � � � � +�� h � � � j� �-•ti I i ' � �i"" "rw � � � '`� ��t �� i 47- � � ,� ' � I � . .L� � � ` � � '•c ' � ° � . ; �. �� `��,,, .� � � ��ya� �. h ( �. � r€ r. Y r � -'�'_` '... I� _ . , E � � O � i { �Sa rL 1 Q � � � . s . ' . ,.... { .. .. � �� ii j�� a ' ��o � �� "�- � I �i�i� �(I� l � � � � ,�' � *� �, i ' � � , , ' : i 1 � � 4 ! � /! ! � '�d�, � � _ ..., "^'{ � � �- `' _. _�_� , ! �.- _. , � � i - � _ _ ._� �.� . L V � � � i � S G. � i _ � �� i i � �� ' � � i t' ' \ ,. ��'�� .� r i . "... .. '. " 4L.-----^� �' &*,�� 1 ' � ( .. i �, !�� i.� � (� �}' � �:�;; � �! � � `�� I ; � � I �'� � �,; ,.� � �� . r. -�- � � �� .�, � � i� `�' D�. ; , � i � � � j � � � �' ' � � { � � � � � � .�.. o � � � � � I� / � . = � � , � - � --- �� ° . � � ��. �� ° � � � � �,' � ' z � � � � � � , � . �� _ �� . � ��- . � , ., M 1 y � a � � � . � � , , ,�. � � _ � , ,„. . , . . .� . � c� �, a a�� rb«:} a t � � . . �, '� � . f� - .. � � � , ,' ., : " ' „ ; i � r o �y, i n . ' 1 � �. � , o � , � � � � � � . �� . � � .,.� �ry... .. ... ' "°f � ? ,- � � � A� . .. � _ , . t � C� . � .. ' � - �� `j . � �^z 'i .. . � �c— � "�� a �n .+s,, � �� L�±-�?� i � � � � �� 4 �� s_r iI � � � � 3 - �' � � � � o � ,�,�, .' ; - _ � . �-.�� 1 � . � .� 2 , ._._..� � � �� 20' FlR� �LANE. ' � �� _ �` ; 4� `1. �( R�C PA�H � AND � "> , ,,; , � --� �;�, EDESTRIANJ WA `jI' cD � ' � � il It I. �+ I � "v, a�o � � , 7�'t cV � � �� i O � 0 .• � � � ' • � Q% � . ' _ _� �� °� t� r '� �� ' � , � � � �� I� � OQ ~ `at' �' � �o - �____ � � ! t-.. ; f i ? j , �, . _ __ __. _ _ -- t � ; � � -- � >� � � � ��' .. � i � � f,� i � a �' � . � � � � �' � � � � -- c o - ``' �� ... ._.._ _._. .. : : .� ��a_ ��._�.�, � • � . � � � q i '; i'`d, + � � (� � � � ; � � '�4k J � � , 11 � ° C, �', � � � � .� ;, Z.�i - _ � , �; � � � � Q �__----- � � �. � r � � � � �.---�- � j -�•. _ . . ' =� � � �, � . .� � ,j �� rn i � � �• �' � � � � ' � p�°�a `� ��r. � � � � - � , U � . � � .9 ° k o �f ,, �: q� � � '� _ � � � O �� O r. � � ? � � � � � ►'7 � c0 '� � N� I � � i rn �t rn j "� \ u-i y ' ` k.} �� ., �� M _ .. �� '`�:,Y e � , a � ° � � � t() C7 z M ;� . � tn � j � �� '� _ y � Z r� � �a .�"' i j�, k,.� � tj � , � � � Q�j ! . .L.. � � � � � t r '+'"� ¢ `'' ; � O I �^,'`� � � `� � �`" l ,,. x ,.� �a O � � �► O . �. T o `�� , , �- , ; . . � � ao, , � " ``^�`' '" ' �'� �- , � , + � ` ; `� O � � j �s, . ._ . _.,. , . � . . _. � � , T-- t �� , , . � � � i � � � E , ``ti, � -�_ � d- i ; �, � �,_p � � i , � � , � � � � J 3 ' t , . � � � � j 4 � Y i , . .E ' � . , � : . � I .L, i I �_._ _ _ _ , __ !_ ,�/ � i � ` � ' 7 ! �'+ +I i-, ±- +t• _ � o,'= 1 � � "; . ' I I � �� x � � � �� i � �r , , , �„ ' � ' j. � . � �. � ' � � °,� �� ; , Y � . �" � ? � ,_ i � � ' � •,;: r�- 'i I - �e ; . � ` � � � �� o , � � � � ° � � � �� , �� - . i 1 � � � � �� o �, 4 � � i � L a— ; ' �; '� 1 .+�� o �$ � � � �' � � � �� i � O ~ Z ' � � � � � � � � � � � - ' � ��_ *"�e � t� t'i, � � � � � , i � � � �� r� � � 1 U) � � � � � i1 .-, . �� " ¢*� _'I � . � , � y� .�� :T . � � _ � � , �z� � ��' r_� � ! n � w � � ii , ;� �� D� E�. _ �� , o � , � �o � � � .ti; , �i= ; ' � � °' � " 3 � �1•, �� ( o ° ` � �� `�� -�-'- 2 � �—` : v - < I 20' FlR� LANE. ' �, � - __� � ;; . . .. AND � `� , � R�C PA�N �, � � � .- ' EDESTRIA�I WA �t °0 0 _. -, (��j ' � ��..� + � a' o °o t �,-� `'. I I 1 I � i �. � ?1 N t70 �, , I .._��.. .�;_.��:.:�. a � _. eEw=aii4 �"' ; . , /," , � � / � � 1 � , � � I � �� j 1 � �.;�. — — -- a � E �� lo� � ' ; �, i i i o5. o , _ ` _ � ��. '� ,� '' 5-STORY PARKING GARAGE - . _ , � ..,� �� , �� _ -- �' � ,, � -,.. � 1 ' 99.1 9_ � - � � � � 103.6 6j�� .. � , � 87 ; _._ �g=-28 Y '� 103.6 '� � . ,.� � ,_ __1 �. _ 98. 7 �� ' � { � � ° (d� 1 ,�� _ �-�._ , . .___� , � � _ _ __._ __ s .o + ---- ,.,,_` _ � ; _ _ � ; _ � ,; . _ .� _-- . --i-f-- _,� '~+ =- , f j t:' 9 7. 4 1�0_ `�1_� _ _ __. . �� z � i= - # ; � ': � �� , 8. 9 �!' ' � � , . � i 98. ,\ 4 � 4 � ; > � u YaRD ,o., , ._ � , � �� w � ~ � � � � � I ; ` � J I � ..�� ;' 1 • , 103.6 99.2 � � ,. �1 . � � � � � 10 . 6 1 Q j o f . � �o �=2$ \ � �o� 7� � `�� I � � �� , __ o ; ,r� � , o ; a , - � �, � � � 8o9s-28 , f a, oa �~ � � � � y �- 8104.28 E A r �� i _ - � � � o � Ft�c S =� _ �--____ , � Ni Y ,. z I E ! , � � , � 99�4 ,�� 98J � � 24: ' t � 4:2¢ � i o _ 98: �' , `� �- -� i � 98.7 �. 1 - LD ' '-, � 103. � 98_6 �� ° � � � � �� i � N , � 9�� . _� �� ; � � . i - , . �C,O � .. � �� . � ?ia 1 . ., . + I r_. -..._._..._.-_._._.._.,---..__- , , � . . i 4 � 4.�?� o,� _,_ _ ,,,,� ` � 2.8 . (i . , � . . � , 3�1 � 1 i ` --"a— _._ — .,..--- _ _ ._.� _ _ _ .__ . ' __—_ _ _ _ _._ _ - , �_. � ,, i ....-- --- - - _ • , � _ . 4-� _ _ _ � � �, .56 +�- ,,.J� �-�� `� �.� �S -�--�--�„ , . -- � ._ _ � — � - _ __ • - - � , >— �_t�, ��.�' � ! �; � - _ � � � - _ � � b ,q� , .� � oa __ --� �aa� . _. � �! � `c�v � � r 4 sa--$ � ; - ��'i'�s 3cN � _--__ �Ba _ �� .:p - ` �_� , � �� .' - , ;a � � �r . ' I / � u �._ �� u,_ � � -- � , v � 814 9 + ' , - r� ii �. _ �.- ! � _ � _ __ 8.0 � `�`�,� -� � � , . , : �. __ ir"'-__�_ �o'�s---�--�- ___ _ .� • _ �!v � � II;. � � ��;o � _ , ,t _�._. - _; _ ... �, _ _ _ �o _ _ - . Sw� � �tR�OIP. n�r"� ," _! _ -� � ; U, - .., � - " . �__.� _____. 5 ___ o0 � � �� i �� A �_ _ ,� -- -- � �'�_,.,; . _ . ��' Q _ F 8_ +5U _ _ _ _- --- -�:+QO _. �'� �, ,....�--_ _ . m ( � 5 �t� � %+0 � 9 � fi�, _ N �� 4. . � '4� r.,; �v � p �2 _ ,�, ` � -- ; � � /<<; __ _ ._._. __ � - - - -- — __ __ _ _ _ 4_ _ . - --- -- , -_ . � _ - � r*r-p - - -+-- , ' 9 ,+ r � � , "-'- - - -___, d__ - -- ----�-- 0� -_ . _ . _. _ ; � _ _ _ _ _. , . . � . � _.._ . .�_ 4 �i . I - _ _ F - �_. -. � i� � � ... . ... �-�� _ .. � vr � . t- � ' . _... . .... � � "� � . _ � i � �-_ _ _.. ...... . , .. __ _ .. .._- __ - -.. . . . __ _ - __ , EXISTiNG BIKE PATH � � , ' TO 8E REMOVED # ', ' - SEWER MANHOLE " _ , 3: EX ST1N PA I G BIKE TH TO BE REM( �i s� ARF�A_BELtf�-STYI�� - �i ,'�I_ �_.__� �� _� _ i�:_. � � -f� :�� s..� ;::�� z�= � fh�-,_ , . '" � �m; " ;; � � � BREAKAWAY 80U.ARDS MH 0140 `� � ' : '� ' __ . _ _ _ . RIM = 8101.3' � ' ` -___ .. �� IN V. IN = 8090J' _ , , p" --___ ____. —� �- + INV. OUT = $0 _- . _ _- _ _. �- _ � - ,- - , __ _ _. ,. �. _ _ � ----, _ _ . __. - - _ _ _ -- �_._ � � � — ---- _.._ --- -- _ _ _ � ` _ _ __ ; _ ' ~ � _ _ _-- -_ _ _._ __-- —_ __ - _ __., -- _ ----`- _ �$� p0� . _ , � _. - - - -__ _--- , ___ . - = -� �-_ _ - ___ ---- ---=- -- _.__ �' ---- _..__ ` �^ --------_ _ — --�, _�._ __ _ ---- - _ _ -, , _____- __'_ ,,,, ` _____ __.� _..._. _ _ _._ _.__ __ __.. __- - _.. _ , ; , .__._ __-- ..._ .. - _-- � - __ , \ __ _ __.^. �.�0 ep�' � ____ ___, _ _ _ _ `_ .. �� .. . . . . . .. ._ . . .... . .. . .. . _.: +r+, .�._.,.�..,,�...,,,..�.r� � �.._,_..-. . . . �- �'�� , .... ' . , , r�, , � , , , , � r- 7� r � , � (� � . � � 8 ,� .� . . . , ,. ; �,,,,... � � � 1 � �� .- �'�'� {! � - .�' �� ' F � S . . � �� .Y ' (-� t. j P �� v � �-........ ` < "� � ) � x . ' . � , , . r r: # . .....� ,., ,.,.�., -._ , � c.�"�' `�s �° �^l'.- __ �� } t�'C_ �- _� }. J'�,'�. �y f�, ..:-�,.,.� - G' E-_ l�: ";"Z ."l� 1'`'� f r r.d ��' � �� , � 1�' ( � i r.. �..�� e' t .` /.. . ...,, 3 _ ,�� T � J � t , �v.. � �� : � f �� l� ,, �, _ ��_.��.... � -�a�s.a� _ . ' 19 � Z� - ___.. . . ; � ��.� � . � � � ��^,.. `" z% °h �. - � � � `� b �.. � s - ... a � `; � f ��.,. I _`�� 4� x' ' ta ` � /} 5��r�1¢t* to�.oB�v �,v a cit e;� � -- -- -.. _ � � ,� _ EXITING CODE SUMMARY �� LEGEND - EGRESS PLRN s�ee�.em�+ '; .: ' � I __.. �e�.�o,•,;.rc:- , ... - _.— � � � �.xev�ertar.r....k,u.�.roorxx, �� 4ERIICXf.V' ....—"—" j r , I i . �� - � � ,,' �_a_,.., �.� x ; i , �.<<,. �� .,. , ��,� � � � _.��., w.:fl�,.��.�..��..�aa„ .,, �,.�..W — - ��k_�„ �,...�t ,u �. e ..�,. � � � � .��„�..,,..�a�.�...�..»»..,'.... . � occuv,wri �v. r.>..� _�...,,..,. .,, .�.�,w i , ae �. .. _.. Y.MdEft I)F CCC� A„ _ �,,...��y,e .� .� , . �� ,. . �r. . � ` _fSC+�MwOF'ECAESSr�Y.e*X:EV� ""'° �x. . un � i . .,..w�n.«..a�.e«xrn�.�.¢nr+c�.r.eu�ue .._ .._.� � ..^.�R...+. el'�Cr�R .,�RESS;:.mA NFNi � . ,'. )� 5 991 �� k- — RE01,4RL� MI �' . . ,�•,. ,°��. -� . � . a . -. .. . , :. ut MG.a �' - c:11hYtM1a rr.n � , •.. ..,._, , _.. , .. . '. . �«a>i �GC.M - O+Y:FRATpY � - �� +.T,'Ip[ x IT5`NkG�"MPO'1EM1 . , mc�u ,..+ � . „ . � .... a6tYVM9r§ �r-•;�i� rl Aiil:qLS.L A1+ �:..f a ;�.� NLtRtEFfI a !. � : I ., .t 5„i1.41J1>PEE � � . ,r ; „�. ..._ . _.... _...._.. _ ' ........ ........ .. .F,/"� � .. ✓�� ' �. m-zwr�u .:.. . .�.� . . . . . .:.... . ......�. ....... .. . . ... ..... ,...... .i =. q�� . _.. .. . " � �� . � ' ;� i ". .._. ._., . . . . .. . .., . ..... . . . . . . . .. �� j .._ . ..� . � . ', �1 i ��...�L� t t . . .. .. , �_ ._ __ _ . . __ _ � � _, , -- _ --- � - _ _, • —_ _. . � � �. �; , . � � u. � 7 `�_�__ ,�,o -- � -� � � � �. � ''_.; ` � 1 '{ . " , �, , _ , _t _ __ � � , �- -_ : r- , � �� .� , , , :�� ; ,l �, ��_ � � i � � 6• ��..� - , e .._, , _ ` -� • t - = f • : t _ _ . -- �(� 1f a� 1j . _'' , - � ' i �;-- - - _ . , , � � -- ;� — _ , ; � C � �,�- � � �_. � ;_ � ...,r.,- ., - 7 � ' � � � ,, i . I i ��°� �'%� ',. , � � •y� � I , vTy_ > � _ - � Cta4 y _ � � . __ � �rS° � �� k '., �� , _ �,'� -�3 . d . - .. . ��. µ� ._"_""""""' ... .... .. .. . ...... .. .. . , . .. � .. , - � : . -� .' � , � . >:' . ^� . , � , fi1�' . ...... ...... .��--"' � r� ��` . . �^- � � �`- 4 � � �C � ^� � _ � C-`� �'� f^� g'7 ) i� � � . , . �— ` Ne �i . _ � ' ,,,. .. ' dJo ! �` �� G � �� r o "• ;Ea �n " ; � „x ; ..��1 ;� ', , � '' _ � ....� -�, ._ ,, ., �� i��"� � — � N �� , � - _ r= ' a � �� ,�� i' � � . - � � �� - � �' �d,�,� � � � + , �, � , . � , �� . _ � . .. _ , : , ,.�. , . t : �� I � 4�r � � � �� . � � � t ,, °� - �� =�> > ,� � ,, . , � � � -�-� • � � � �� - ��—o— , , � , i :,,. . ;,, ;` � � �� --� : , � �� o , ' -� . _. � r, _ . � . � <:.�...�: ;..; � _ �� . �, � � �-�'�..r ... �. � C._I f0 � � � ° y � �'� 1 � � —'_ ^ • ., q i �-,. ' �h �.. ,� ,�„ �r°m•� . �a-iL+� t`Tf �11�'P'.,p-a'.. '" �' .'Q'°o nn '!II's.�. �n eln .-,� .._m� t--"' � �� ,.r,. ., w_ � _ � � � � �-; " • ,� .y1. .�. .. � � , r4.. � : . . .r. ..^ ,_, . � � :_. .. ' � , I r' a • ' ' s �- . . . . .. , w: . � r . � � i - . . ,� � - _ � ' > , .. � .,� � f,i. � i .; „ _ , .� , . ` ` 4 �. � t _ -� i 7. � -- - �� r`l - � � ` � - _ ` I _.� ; � i *, ' �- s— � +�` .� "�-�.a� ° � � � � _ � � , � ��q� ,,� .,:� �. � � ._._�.. . � �>� 1�_ : �� l`I fYl � . _ � .. . �.-�� .. � � � -`, � � . v# ---�--'� - �1 _ 5. _ .. ^ . t � , P �..+! ' ' �': « :� > ' -_. . �. .. � � �� X 9 �. n J , �.� -�. ° " "< , ;�;; _ - ? _ _ ' `. . , �+ ' .-�-- � : �� , � .. �� . � -�� . � ( , -�; ..�_..,__ , - ; : : .,.F = . �� - ,.� .0 � � � .... . �.,, � . . � - _ , ,j h _.�- . ��P----'�' . . ` j � . � . .. �. � � L / , ' :� ,.. , LL: t '� . , y _i (.. . . . . ` �, , . . > -1 � __� ....__.n,..., � . . , � � . „ ' _,__ �. .. ..._- � .�. . . .. � /t^ "� >.. ��-. . , J , e � 1i� ° ` � .�. , # .. ,. _ � , .. �-,�,� . g., s� a .. � ..._..__� ___�___..._ .� � _ ,... . . �� •' . • � - : � x ��• , ... . . — .�..�..w _ . . . � .. .. -}�,, . � . : . , �� =, l�iJ �'0� `��-��ti'��-- , Cx►r . ,._-�` - � ._ _ , �� _GROUND FLOOR EGRESS PIAN _ � _— ---. m m �� 0 � k :�� , ��.' Q ' J � J LL. `' W :.� � �1 (7 � .: :� � � , � W � � m L � � � J • � > > ., �� y �ew, �,arm o x rsea , �. . rt°. K W Z a : ��g.� � ¢�1 �?t a ~ ��e � � � w�� w=°� �� >�_ _ _�, aQ:. 1 � _ � TOWN OF VAtI, t. MEMBERS PRESENT Luke Cartin Rollie Kjesbo Micheal Kurz Sarah Paladino Bill Pierce Tyler Scheidman David Viele PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION March 22, 2010 1:OOpm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits: 1. Timber Ridge Village Apartments — 1280 North Frontage Road �/ � � �0 � � 180 minutes A request for a final review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, to allow for the redevelopment of an approximate five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Approved with conditions (see the nine conditions of approval in the staff memorandum dated March 22, 2010) MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 4-3-0 (Kjesbo, Paladino, Pierce opposed) George Ruther gave a detailed presentation on the number and types of units being proposed and the elements of the site plan. He further discussed the associated variance and subdivision ap�lications. He discussed the height of the structure, the requested parking requirement reduction, landscape area, site coverage, etc. Commissioner Paladino asked for a comparable structure which has elements at 100 feet in height. Solaris was identified as being 99.9 feet in height above the plaza and the Ritz-Carlton tower which is approximately 104 feet in height. Commissioner Pierce inquired as to the number of parking spaces present at Timber Ridge currently. George Ruther stated that there are approximately 300 parking spaces at Timber Ridge today. Commissioner Pierce asked for an explanation of the table found on page 12 of the memorandum which highlights the employee housing problem as identified by the Town. George Ruther and Nina Timm explained the difference and the origin of the information found in the tables on pages 2 and 12 of the staff memorandum. It was highlighted that the table on page 2 was representing the entirety of Timber Ridge and the table on page 12 was highlighting the portion of the project which was being redeveloped which amounted to 102 units. Page 1 Commissioner Viele inquired with regard to the 30% goal and how many employees we are attempting to house. George Ruther explained that the goal was to house 30% of the work force in the deed restricted employee housing. It was understood that more than 30% would be in Town as there are employees who will be living in free market housing. Commissioner Kjesbo summarized that the proposal roughly doubled the employees housed on the site. Nina Timm confirmed that the project was indeed doubling the density of employees housed on the site. Rick Pylman, representing the applicant, gave a presentation highlighting the multiple public hearings and meetings held with regard to the Timber Ridge redevelopment. Mr. Pylman made himself available for questions. Jeff Winston gave a presentation utilizing a 3-D digital model to depict the proposed project. He highlighted the articulation of the structure, height, retaining walls, and the rockfall mitigation fence along Lions Ridge Loop. Commisioner Pierce inquired as to the definition of "cross-over aisle" width. Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, utilized the digital model to clarify the cross-over aisle width as depicted on the top deck of the proposed parking structure. Steve Lindstrom, representing the Vail Local Housing Authority, reiterated that the Authority has consistently advocated the proposed type of housing. He cautioned against stating during the current economic climate that we should allow the free market to take care of the problem, or to say that we do not need the number of seasonal workers we have had in the past. He believes this location is ideal for a bold solution to the identified housing need. Kaye Ferry, resident, believes the proposal is exciting for the community and what is currently on the site is embarrassing. She cautioned against falling into a lull due to the current state of the economy. She highlighted the cuts in Eagle County Transit that have affected service this year. She stated that Council has told us the program and the location for the solution to the employee housing problem so she believes the time for debating bulk, mass, and height, do not need to be debated. She encouraged the Commission to approve the project. Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowner's Association, wanted to bring attention to the elephant in the room. He stated that the elephant was the policy direction given by Council which did not have a basis for zoning, bulk, and mass, which are the purview of the Commission and Design Review Board. He requested Greg Hall, Public Works Director, show him where the pedestrian bridge would be located for this project. Greg Hall spoke to the question regarding a pedestrian bridge and the challenges of landing the bridge on the south side of the interstate. Jim Lamont continued by inquiring as to the possible engineering solutions such as landing the pedestrian bridge on the Cascade parking structure. � Greg Hall answered the questions. Page 2 Jim Lamont inquired with a technical question regarding why the rock fall mitigation fence was extend along the extent of the proposed parking structure. George Ruther responded that the regulations are intended to protect persons and property from dangers related to geologic hazards. Jim Lamont believed there may be an approach which better addresses the aesthetics. He suggested that Lions Ridge Loop be abandoned and a trench put in its place. He inquired as to what services/neighborhoods would be affected. Greg Hall highlighted the Lions Ridge Loop bus route and emergency access. Jim Lamont inquired as to the availability of ridership data for that bus route should it be affected or abandoned. He continued by highlighting concerns over the arrival of the leadership at a goal of 30% to address employee housing and the lack of review to determine where the density should go to address the concern. He highlighted a concern about the visual impact of the fire lane running the length of the project and other methods to allow for fire fighting opportunities. He called for a third party independent body to review the proposed plans for compliance with the fire code. Why can't a fire be fought from the Frontage Road? We cannot continue to warehouse our most valuable resource which are the employees which come to work here to provide the serves and lifestyles we are accustom too. Commissioner Pierce stated that the cross-over aisle width and the rock fall mitigation are significant issues that we do not have certainty that as to how they will function. How tall is the clear plate of the parking structure? Rick Pylman stated that the clear was 7'6". Commissioner Kjesbo stated that 7'6" was fairly standard if not on the high end for garage clearance. Commissioner Pierce stated another concern regarding the snow removal from the top deck of the parking structure. He continued by asking if the project was ready for a final action at today's hearing with all the conditions given that some of the conditions are potentially deal breakers if the applicant can address them. George Ruther stated that in conversations between staff and the applicant that the conditions will allow for proper functioning of the project. He highlighted rock fall mitigation, snow removal, and landscaping as issues which have been and will be continued to be addressed. Commissioner Viele stated that he believes the rock fall mitigation needs to occur on site and he believes that he is comfortable with the project so long as additional review is provided for elements such as the rockfall mitigation. He feels that the policy has been set and he does not believe it is possible to put the program identified on the site. He will be supporting the project. Commissioner Cartin was concerned with regard to the representation of landscaping on the plans as half of what is shown will not be installed. He agreed with Commissioner Viele statements. Commissioner Kjesbo stated the densities of the North Trail Townhomes, Middle Creek, and this proposal. He felt that instead of placing multiple properties into open space designation that some should have been set aside for employee housing of lower densities. He will not be able to support the proposaL Page 3 Commissioner Kurz stated his desire to have a vibrant community and address the needs of the Town's Master Plans. He will be supporting the application. Commissioner Paladino agreed with Commissioner Kjesbo and did not feel the project was appropriately designed. Commissioner Schneidman stated he believes that given the need for employee housing and the responses of the applicant that he will be supporting the project. Commissioner Pierce identified that the need exists and that this is an appropriate site, however, the lack of availability to plant landscaping between the project and the Frontage Road of any significant. He believes the need to provide employee housing should be spread across the entirety of the 10 acre site. 10 minutes 2. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, to allow for the construction of retaining walls in excess of six (6') feet in height, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1,and setting forth details in regard thereto (PEC100001) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-1-0 (Kjesbo opposed) 10 minutes 3. A request for final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re-subdivision of the Timber Ridge site, located 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100005) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Viele VOTE: 7-0-0 30 minutes 4. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of public buildings and grounds (fire station), and a request for the review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls exceeding six feet (6') in exposed wall face height, located at 2399 North Frontage Road WesUParcel A, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and 2310 Chamonix Road/Parcel B, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100007, PEC100008) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Belford Watkins Group and VAg, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson Conditional Use Permit ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 7-0-0 1. Variance ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Paladino VOTE: 7-0-0 � 1. The retaining walls shall not exceed 7 feet in wall face height. Page 4 l�.. � � TOWN OF VAI� ` THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on February 8, 2010, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a final review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, to allow for the redevelopment of an approximate five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village ��Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 �a North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) � Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, to allow for the construction of retaining walls in excess of six (6') feet in height, located at 1280 �'� North Frontage Road/Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1,and setting forth �� details in regard thereto (PEC100001) J�� Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC � Planner: George Ruther The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please cail 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published January 22, 2010, in the Vail Daily. � ■ TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 United States Postal Service Joal Hormann Real Estate Division WE 330 San Bruno, CA 94099 � � �� t� �Yt;� � r rtti� ��*� � �. " ht X;C i� `.=s� �i �. C}C: i i��'PLJV�2N '7� �ht�l3F°f`x��N`1 l.lN�,t��._�: i� �c:: �:�,�.�y�as��s�� l,>1,?x1li,llat�i,l.l,��i,l��i1 TOWN �F VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 United States Postal Service Joal Hormann Real Estate Division WE 330 San Bi-uno, CA 94U99 � � �� ^ �� .t� P�' `<�` � T��,1;.� ,.� Z ;� � � ;�. � ' V� PITNEY BON7E5 - # 0 2 ,M $ aa.44° ' 0004259575 JAN21 20' MAILEDFROMZIPCODE 816- hl.t:.iE: ��i TJt: i t�t� c��I'.:€y.I3.L7 F��'PL.1F2N 'T�J ��h1t�E=R �1d;5k�i°f`�:�7��'i'Y At��F?�� LIT^l�-1%te�: it? F�.73�1JA}�i] 13C: ti:'L�_5y�t�5�6�� ;1*#7i"i—t�4�1�7—.dZ1-3� , , i��c tt �„tt �t ,) �� c �� i�7�{7:i:_.�_ xi:SlSs�ei�lel�4ti4��e.,4� „lSi�.tii�.�,e)? ;.� � � � Tirr�ber Rid e Af f ordable Housing Process Roadrr►ap 9 Aprii 25, 2007 Lnnd Use Plnn Amendment Initial Meeti ngs with Town Staff Rezone to HDMF or Housing District Initiate CDOT Approval Process Town Council Cnll-Up Development Plnn Approval esign Review Application Approval Town Council Call-Up Civil Drawing Review & Approvnl E i Ap I CDOT Approva Start Construction � • �`� �,,; � /�/C> __ __� _ ,.... _ __ _ _ , l -__ _ � -- � __- - _ . ' �i� �s��__��ru�; �t � � , � � ---- •�- __ _ _ . . � � ' _ %`� _ _ _ _� ___ . __ --- _ __ _----------- _,.� . _ _ 3 ' _ _ _ _ . - - -_ . _ .. -. ,� • ,, z ,��., . . ,a.� -��'° _ �. -- _ _ . . -___.. _ . , _ _ _. �� S. ---�..� _ ___ _ _ ; l f � � —�; { ---;:. _�3 : � _ _ _ _ .__ _ _ --- — � _ _ _ _ __ ,�_ _ _ � . __ _ , _ ___ _ _. _ _ _ -_ _ ___ --- _ _ ___ _ �� . � 2�-�'-v1__ . .._ _� _� _ _--�-°�-`� _ _ _— � `� __ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ �" _- -- _ _ _ {� - � _ ' _ . . . __----�-__ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ __ . . �_ _ -__ _, __ _. _ Z . /C�_��,y.,� ' _ _ ___ ^_ _ _______ , _ - r __ . --- _____ _ , , , / _ __ _ _ __. ' � .��' _ _ ____---._ _ _._._ _ __ _ _- -- ---. - --- - ___ - ..� __,__ ____ --_ _!Z ,.__�l.,o-u�-._.,,��o..�-a�� _ __.__ _. -- . 13 ' . _ • ___— ..r��-� - -- - _ . _. ___-- . _ -- _ _ � . - _ _._ _ �� . --_� --_� ____ - -.-� - • _ _ — i�,�j,Q ��.�.� _____�-� __ . _ z �5. " _ _ ____._ . _ _. --- .__ - _ _- - � _ _____ _____.___ __.�___-- - . �_ - _ _ -�- • _ __� _ ..__.____.___ _ _ __. __ __ _______ __ _.___ _______ __. - - ___ _. __ _ _ a • � � . y �,�� __ ,� � _ f _. ___ _ ..�� , � , _ . , _._ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _- 1�3 ;. �%D� .�c� _c.�d-�--- �..,�`�,c-�c-d .��__ __�� __ _ .._ __ . __ -___ .. , _ _ __.-- �— _ . _ _ ___ !� �,, _. ___ � ; _ � ___._._ . _ __. -- -- _._ _ __ _. _ �_ _ � � � �..� _ _ �N � _ __.� ', _ � __ _. _ _ _ r-._._, _ _ .. ' _ �u. .-��.- � �_ z�,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ � . ____ _ __ __ . _ .__. Zr '` � __ _ _ ___ __ _ �� : --- . . ___ _ __ . ___ _ ___ _ _ �,_ _ __ _ ---. �� . ..�... , , �, . _ . . ; __ _ _ _ _ __ ______��_____ � _�- . ; ��Z z . � � . __ _ _ _ _ �' _�z____�__ �1 _ __ . __ ;. _ - Z� - _ � �� _ __ __� __ _. _ .�� w ___ __._._ _. _ . _ . . z� . ��_�.�� _ _ _ _ � �, __ ____ �__. . �� • �____ . _ _ __ _ __ _� . _ __�. . . __ _ ___ �. . j . .�-,. __ __ . . . , _ __ _ _ .�_ --- - _ . _ _ --- . . . � �� _ �LG � . ____. _ _ _ _ �-__ , �J��__ _ . • _... _ _ � 6 � �__.._ _ --------- -- --- - --- __-� ___ _�� . _ - - _ ___. ___.__- __ _ _ _____ . _ __ _____ --- __ ---- _ _ _ ___ --- ____ � , ___ _ _ , __ _ , � � ___ ___ ___ � _ --- - ---_ — _ _ _ `? .-nL��-�-,.�<c�.,� _ ___ . _`�'? _ 2 __ � __ _ . . _ _ _ __ _ . �. ' • v.,f,,,i�,/�,r�.... • __ _ . � _._.... � � __ _ _ __ . _ -- „_ __ _ . _ _. ._-- _ _ _.... - - - __.. . _ - ' ' �% � � � �°� ____ _ �_-�-�� -- - -- _ _ _ . • , _ � _ __ . ________ ,* _ _ __ __ --- - -- _ _ _ . ........ ... ._. i.� � j .�.--._ � __ __ . 30 , _ TIMBER RIDGE DISCUSSION ITEMS L Due Dili�ence a. Review bond documents and meet with U.S. Bancorp 1. Determine if bonds can be bifurcated, is there a defeasance and what is the viability of doing a land lease with bonds remaining in place. b. Discuss the entitlement process, meetings, public notiiications, etc. c. Review "as-built" drawings and start dialogue about utility d. e. f. g• h. i. separation. Discuss Water District tap fees and in-lieu fees Geotech reports Title Reports Discuss conducting Market Study and Focus Group meetings as soon as possible even while negotiating the Pre-development Agreement. Go through the land acquisition list of items that must be checked off (Darren you have the list) Get all current operating information on the Timber Ridge Apartments, including rent roll and all expenses. II. Town of Vail's Obligation: a. Ground Lease the Timber Ridge 5.04 acres to Vail Timber Ridge, LLC for 75 years. Since Town retains ownership, it is assumed that property taxes will continue to be exempt as our pro forma reflected. b. Introduce VTR to U.S. Bancorp to discuss options c. Timely set up public hearings for processing the entitlements to develop the 372 units and 380 space garage. Determine appropriate approval procedure. d. Issue "will serve" letters for municipal services e. Facilitate Vail Timber Ridge's ability to obtain "Vested Rights" to develop the property. f. Help identify citizen groups for VTR to meet with. g, Participate in open dialogue regarding the design, schedule and potential hurdles so that the team can meet the Town's and VTR's goals for the project. h. Obtain easement grants and vacations and other grants, approvals or dispositions from the holders of affected property interests that are necessary with the construction of the project (property line to North needs to be reviewed for adjustment). � � � Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Meeting Vail, Colorado May 12 —13, 2009 Monday, May 12 4:30 PM - Meet at Town of Vait offices 5:00 PM — Tour of Timber Ridge Vail Town Staff 6:00 PM - Dinner at Atwater Restaurant on Gore Creek, Vail Cascade Resort and Spa Vail Town Council, Vail Local Housing Authority, Vail Town Staff Tuesday, May 13 Sonnenalp Resort of Vail Garmisch, Munich meeting room Opens at 9:00 AM 9:30 —10:30 AM - Entitlements and Infrastructure George Ruther, Community Development Director Matt Mire, Town Attorney Greg Hall, Public Works Director Nina Timm, Housing Coordinator 10:30 —11:30 AM - Financials Stan Zemler, Town Manager Judy Camp, Finance Director (by phone) Kelli McDonald, Economic Development Manager Calvin Hansen, Sherman and Howard (by phone) Jonathan Heroux, Piper Jaffray (by phone) 11:30 AM —12:30 PM - Brainstorming and Working Lunch All Above Vail Local Housing Authority members Suzanne Silverthorn, Communify Information Officer 12:30 —12:45 PM - Next Steps 12:45 —1:00 PM - Schedule 1:00 PM - Adjournment 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 p. (866) 650-9020 (970) 479-2100 www. vailgov. com � � � ��NOF��`' THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on February 22, 2010, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A joint work session with the Vail Town Council to discuss environmental stewardship and sustainability policies and employee housing goals and strategies. An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Administrator's determination that Section 14-5-2-K, Valet Parking, Vail Town Code, does not require that at least 50% of the required parking spaces provided on site must operate as self-parking, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Appellant: Donald Zelkind Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, and Section 12- 14-17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition within the side, rear, and stream setbacks, located at 433 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 16B (Vail Trails East)/Lot 15, Block 4, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100002) Applicant: Bruecker Wood Real Estate Trust, represented by Steven James Riden Architect Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re-subdivision of the Timber Ridge site, located 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100005) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6G-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition within the side and rear setbacks, located at 1817 Meadow Ridge Road, Unit 6/Lot 21, Buffehr Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100003) Applicant: Robert Boymer Planner: Rachel Friede A report to the Planning and Environmental Commission on a staff approval of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to 12-16-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to a conditional use permit for a public school and active outdoor recreation facilities, located at 551 N Frontage Rd W/ Part of Lot 8, .�" � _� � �� , . THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on February 8, 2010, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a final review of an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, to allow for the ,,, redevelopment of an approximate five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village ��Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units, located at 1280 ��' North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038) � Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, to allow for the construction of retaining walls in excess of six (6') feet in height, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1,and setting forth . �� details in regard thereto (PEC100001) �a Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC �J Planner: George Ruther The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published January 22, 2010, in the Vail Daily. � � �. � � � � T��V OF VAIL . THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on February 22, 2010, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A joint work session with the Vail Town Council to discuss environmental stewardship and sustainabili±y policies and employee heusing goals and strategies. An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Administrator's determination that Section 14-5-2-K, Valet Parking, Vail Town Code, does not require that at least 50% of the required parking spaces provided on site must operate as self-parking, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Appellant: Donald Zelkind Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, and Section 12- 14-17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition within the side, rear, and stream setbacks, located at 433 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 16B (Vail Trails East)/Lot 15, Block 4, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100002) Applicant: Bruecker Wood Real Estate Trust, represented by Steven James Riden Architect Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to aliow for a re-subdivision of the Timber Ridge site, located 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots C1-05, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100005) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC Planner: George Ruther A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6G-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition within the side and rear setbacks, located at 1817 Meadow Ridge Road, Unit 6/Lot 21, Buffehr Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100003) Applicant: Robert Boymer Planner: Rachel Friede A report to the Planning and Environmental Commission on a staff approval of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to 12-16-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to a conditional use permit for a public school and active outdoor recreation facilities, located at 551 N Frontage Rd W/ Part of Lot 8, _�� , � � Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. � (PEC100004) Applicant: Eagle County School District, represented by Ray Scott Planner: Rachel Friede The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The pub�ic is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970- 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published February 5, 2010, in the Vail Daily. � � � � �'PROVED E�Y THE MEMORANDUM ��'N� �'� V'�'��' `,fVr,lli`!G ,�NC� TO: Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission "�"j�',�. ('"� `��'��j[� FROM DATE Community Development Department March 22, 2010 �� 3 ZZ�/� ..�. �j�i•R. SUBJECT: A request for a review of a Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vaii Town Code to allow forthe redevelopment of a five (5) acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 359 new deed-restricted employee housing units; and a request for a review of a preliminary plan and final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for a resubdivision of Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, Block C, A resubdivision of Lots C1, 2, 3, 4& 5; and a review of a variance from Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of retaining walls in excess of six (6') feet in height, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/ Lots C1-05, Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No.1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090038)(PEC100005)(PEC100001) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation Planner: George Ruther SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman, of Pylman & Associates, are requesting a review of three development applications intended to facilitate the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. The proposal would remove nine existing apartment buildings containing 102 apartment units, and replaces them with three new attached apartment buildings containing 352 deed restricted housing units, a five-story tall, 520 space parking garage and a resident's clubhouse According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, Lots C1-5 of the Lions Ridge Subdivision are zoned Housing (H) District. As such, all future development on the site shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Housing District development standards and processes. A complete zoning analysis for the project is outlined in Section V of this memorandum. Based upon staff's analysis of the criteria for review for the proposed project, as outlined in Sections VII - IX of this memorandum, the staff is recommending that the Planning & Environmental Commission: tA � ��.0 Yv approves, with conditions, the applicant's request to establish a Development Plan for the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments site, approves the request for the retaining wall height variance, and; forwards a recommendation of approval, with modifications, of the request for a preliminary plan and final plat of the Lions Ridge Subdivision. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS Development Plan The applicants are proposing to redevelop the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Vill�ge Ap'ar�men�levelopment site and construct a new five-story tall building extending approxirnatel�i'$q,Q f�et along the North Frontage Road (Attachment A- Vicinity Map). The n�v� bufiding will contain up to 352 new employee housing units capable of housing between �5�9�0 �mployees. According to the proposed development plan, the 352 new residential units will be a mix of 6% or 22 studio units, 39% or 138 one bedroom units and 55% or 192 two bedroom units. The western haif of the site (96 apartments) will remain operational throughout the redevelopment construction process. A new five-level enciosed, parking garage will be constructed on the site along with improved public transit facilities to meet the minimum parking and transportation needs of the residents of the development. A 5,760 square foot clubhouse will be constructed within the West building. The clubhouse includes exercise areas, offices, a cyber cafe, a club room and business/conference room space. A written narrative from the applicants, entitled "Timber Ridqe Development Plan Application", date stamped March 11, 2010, describing the development application requests is attached for reference (Attachment B). A reduced copy of the proposed plan is attached for reference (Attachment C). Proposed Eastern Portion Redevelopment Total Range of Average # of % of Square Feet Number of Number of Employees Employees Units Unit Mix of Units Bedrooms Bedrooms / Unit Housed 22 6% 393 sq. ft. Studio 22 1.15 - 1.35 25 - 30 530 - 650 138 39% sq. ft. One 138 1.5 - 2.0 207 - 276 786 - 931 192 55% sq. ft. Two 384 2.75 - 3.2.5 528 - 624 _—. _— _--- — - - __-- ;-1-_ --- 3a2 ` 'i fl0% �44 _ 7�a - �30 � source - Vail Town Code and the Town of Vail Employee Housing Strategic Plan Retaininq Wall Heiqht Variance The applicants are requesting a retaining wall height variance to facilitate redevelopment on the Timber Ridge Village Apartments site (the "Development Site"). Presently, more than fifty feet (50') of grade change occurs north/south across the site. Given the topography of the site and the residential uses permitted, a significant amount of the slope retention is required to accommodate development on the site. As proposed, the retaining walls will be up to 12 feet in height behind the buildings and along the northerly edge of the development site. Pursuant to Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, the maximum height of retaining walls shall not exceed six feet (6') in height. �� Fin al Plat The applicants are requesting review of a major subdivision application to create a new final plat of the Development Site. The purpose of the final plat is to facilitate redevelopment of the property by creating two new lots, the necessary easemerris and allow for the future transfer of ownership of the property. As proposed, Lots C1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1 would be resubdivided to create Lots 1& 2 of the new Timber Ridge Subdivision. Upon creation Lot 1 would be approximately 4.840 acres (210, 830 sq. ft.) in size and Lot 2 would be approximately 5.242 acres (228,342 sq. ft.) square feet in size. According to the land use summary noted on the proposed final plat, the total size of the major subdivision shall be approximately 10.082 acres. A reduced copy of the proposed final plat is attached for reference (Attachment D). III. BACKGROUND The Town of Vail acquired Timber Ridge Village Apartments in 2003 for $20 million to preserve the deed restricted employee housing designation on the property. Constructed in 1981, Timber Ridge is Vail's largest deed-restricted employee housing complex, currently consisting of 198 rental apartment units on ten acres. Each of the existing units is 745 sq. ft. in size with two bedrooms and one bathroom. Presently, the eastern portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments provides housing to more than 408 persons (four occupants per � unit X 102 units). Existin Timber Rid e Villa e Apartments Total Number Number Average # of % of Square Feet of of Employees Employees Units Unit Mix of Units Bedrooms Bedrooms / Unit Housed 198 100% 745 sq. ft. 2 396 4.0 792 IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Town Code Housing (H) Zone District 12-61-1: PURPOSE: The housing district is intended to provide adequate sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed forotherresidential zoning districts. Itis necessary in this district to provide development standards specifically prescribed for each development proposal orproject to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 ofthis title and to provide for the public welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as conditional uses, which are intended to be incidental and secondary to the residential uses of the district. The housing district is intended to ensure that employee housing permitted in the districf is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the allowed types of uses. 3 12-6/-8: PARK/NG AND LOADING: Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. No parking or loading area shall be located within any required setback area. At the discretion of the planninq and environmental commission variations fo the parkinq standards outlined in chapter 10 of this title mav be approved durrnq the review of a development plan subiect to a parkinq manapement plan. The parkinq manaqement plan shall be approved bV the planninq and environmental commission and shall provide for a reduction in the parkinq repuirements based on a demonstrated need for fewer parkinq spaces than chapter 10 of this title would require. For example, a demonstrated need for a reduction in the repuired parkinq could include: A. Proximity or availabilitv of alternative modes of transportation includinq but not limited to, public transit or shuttle services. 8. A limitation placed in the deed restrictions limitinq the number of cars for each unit. C. A demonstrated permanent propram including but not limited to rideshare proqrams, carshare proprams shuttle service or staqqered work shifts 12-61-10: OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the H district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as proposed by the applicant, as prescribed by the planning and environmental commission, and as adopted on the approved development plan: 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Building height. 3. Density control (including gross residential floor area). 12-17-1: PURPOSE, VARIANCES: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to /essen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, ordimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. V. ZONING ANALYSIS Address: 1280 North Frontage Road Legal Description: Lots C1-05, Lions Ridge Filing No. 1 Zoning: Housing District Land Use Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Current Land Use: Medium Density Residential Dwellings Lot Size: 5.24 acres/ 228,254 square feet Geologically Sensitive Areas: High Severity Rockfall Development Standard Required Proposed Min. Lot Area: determined by PEC 228,254sq.ft.(5.24acres) � VI 1�If� Density Control: Min. Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Max. Building Height: Max. GRFA: Max. Site Coverage: Min. Landscape Area determined by PEC 20' (north) 20' (east) 20' (west) 20' (south) determined by PEC determined by PEC 55°/o unless at least 75% of parking is covered and approved by the PEC 68,476 sq. ft. (30%) Min. Parking: Per Chapter 10 (693 spaces), or a max. 25% reduction (520 spaces) approved by the PEC based upon the Parking Management Plan provided SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Current Land Use North: Residential South: Interstate 70 ROW East: Residential West: US Postal Service Zonin Two-Family Primary/Secondary Not Zoned High Density Multiple Family Residential High Density Multiple Family Residential CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, DEVELOPMENT PLAN 67.17 d.u./ac. (352 d.u.) 25' (north) 20' (east) 50' (west) 54' (south) 100' (tower element) 79' (building) 252,628 sq. ft. 97,448 sq. ft. (43%) 68,736 sq. ft. (30%) 520 spaces min. Land Use Desiqnation Low Density Residential Not Designated High Density Residential High Density Residential The review criteria and findings for evaluation for the review and consideration of a development plan are prescribed in Section 12-61-13 of the Zoning Regulations. According to Section 12-61-13, the following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable desiqn criteria. A list of the applicable design criteria are outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. 12-61-13: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria. � A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. Architecture The proposed redevelopment project is intended to be an assemblage of four new residential buildings wrapping three sides of a new above-grade parking garage. As designed, there are an East, West, Center and Parking Garage buildings. The four buildings are physically connected to one another in an east to west alignment extending approximately 800 feet along the length of the building envelope. The residential buildings will have sloping roof gable and hip roof forms with pitches of up to 7:12 and a mix of stone, stucco and cementious wood siding on the exterior. Additional design accents such as wooden shutters, south facing exterior decks and balconies and exposed wood beams and structural bracing are included on the proposed buildings. The applicants are scheduled for a public hearing before the Town of Vail Design Review Board on Wednesday, April 7, 2010. Staff believes the architecture of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. Character The buildings have been designed as an assemblage of four individual buildings connected to one another. The east and west buildings are similar in design and form. Each building is designed with double-loaded corridors for internal circulation and contains south facing exterior courtyards for access to the buildings and passive outdoor recreation. These two buildings have been designed to be up to five stories in height. The third, or "center", building utilizes a single-loaded corridor for internal access and is also five stories tall. The "center" building provides the front fa�ade intended to screen the view of the parking garage. As designed, the "center" building creates a townhouse appearance along the North Frontage Road. The fourth and final building is the enclosed parking garage. The parking garage contains the required off-street parking spaces for the development, a resident's storage area, and access to trash and recycling facilities. The parking garage is accessed directly from the North Frontage Road. The style of the three residential buildings can be characterized as maintaining an alpine form of design. Sloping roof forms, hip and gable roof ends, steeply pitching tower elements and a mixture of stone, stucco and wood make up the exterior building materials. The color palette selected for the building is an assortment of light and dark earth-tone colors. Architectural elements such as wooden decks, exposed beam ends, decorative bracing and covered main entrances have been incorporated to accentuate the character of the buildings. Scale and Massinq The scale of the proposed buildings is large when compared in context with surrounding uses and structures. There is little doubt that the proposed building will be one of the larger buildings constructed in the Town of Vail. The applicants have attempted to mask the scale and mass of the building by providing vertical articulation to the roof line and building mass. For example, the easternmost portions of the building have been lowered in height to more 6 directly relate to the existing scale and massing of the Savoy Villas Condominiums residential units on the neighboring property. Additionally, the visual scale and massing of the parking garage was reduced by filling in and flattening out the grades on the north side of the parking garage. This change in grading substantiaily reduces the long, extensive linear mass of the parking garage and buries nearly 80% of the parking garage below grade. Staff believes the scate and massing of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. Orientation The four new buildings are sited predominately on an east to west orientation and generally parallel with the North Frontage Road and Lions Ridge Loop. The orientation of the buildings is driven primarily by the shape and configuration of the platted development site. Four south facing exterior courtyards have been proposed along the south edge of the buildings. The four courtyards are designed to provide useable outdoor passive recreation areas for the residents of the buildings. According to the sun/shade analysis, the courtyards will receive varying amounts of direct sunlight throughout the year. A five story tall enclosed parking garage has been oriented in the center portion of the site and screened on three sides by proposed buildings. The north side of the garage has been substantially buried below grade to screen the structure from the view of the public. Staff believes the orientation of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. Responsiveness to the site The buildings and improvements have been designed to be responsive to the site. Nearly all of the activity associated with the site occurs along the south-facing edge of the development site. Both pedestrian and vehicle access to the buildings is taken from the south side. The buildings have been as far as practical to the south so as to minimize the amount of encroachment into the steeply sloping north hillside. To that end, however, the applicants are also seeking approval of a retaining wall height variance in order to facilitate development on the site. Responsiveness to the surroundinq neiqhborhood and uses Several revisions were made to the original proposal in order to increase the responsiveness of the building and uses to the surrounding neighborhood. For instance, the mass of the easternmost portion of the buildings was reduced to better relate to the mass and orientation of the existing Savoy Villas Condominiums. In addition, the westernmost end of the building was redesigned to lower the finish floor elevation to more closely match that of the existing North Frontage Road and pedestrian path. As a result, a significant amount of retaining walls were eliminated and substantial number of pedestrian stairs were removed. One important opportunity for improving compatibility with adjacent uses was not pursued however. The proposed building continues to maintain an entrance/exit on the east end building. This entrance/exit, while convenient, has the potential to negatively irnpact the use and enjoyment of the residential property to the east. Given the high volume of traffic this � entrance will likely see, it might be better suited for another location. If this entrance/exit 7 were simply relocated to the other side of the hallway, the potential for any negative impacts would be significantly reduced and the resident's use of the courtyard likely enhanced. Staff recommends the applicants reconsider the location of the entrance/exit. Responsiveness to the Community The Timber Ridge Village Apartments redevelopment is in direct response to an identified community need. Through the adoption of the Town of Vail Employee Housing Strategic Plan the need for employee housing was quantified and a goal for the community was set. In response to this need, the Town has actively pursued the redevelopment of the site. Given the central location of the site to the identified job centers, its proximity to public transit facilities, and its ability to accommodate a significant amount of infill development, this redevelopment site is well-suited for a project of this scope and size. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and, when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. Functionality and Aesthetics The landscape plan needs further revision and attention. A well-designed and implemented landscape plan has the opportunity to bring numerous improvements and enhancements to the overall project, both functionally and aestheticafly. First, the sizes of trees should be increased to be more reflective of the scale and mass of the buildings. Five story tall buildings and a predominance of 6' — 8' tall spruce trees are not compatible. A greater variety of tree sizes should be incorporated to better integrate the buildings into the context of the neighborhood. A significant landscape screen is needed along Lions Ridge Loop to again mask the scale of the building and provide greater visual interest to both persons passing by the site as well as the residents living in the units on north side of the buildings. By and large, there is effectively no landscape on the north side of the building. Greater consideration should be given to the planting plan. In many areas native aspen trees are used in a very linear, street tree form which is foreign to their more natural appearance. Instead, a more random and organic planting plan should be pursued to ensure the development fits into the mountain environment that is Vail. Attention should be given to where trees and planting are placed to optimize their aesthetic and environmental value to the overall development. All of the trees proposed along the south side of the fire lane/pedestrian path should be relocated on the site to avoid conflicts with the buried water and sewer lines. The area is more conducive to shrubs, perennial beds and turf. As such, the area could also be better utilized for much needed snow storage areas. Special attention needs to be directed towards maintaining safe sight distance triangles at driveway entrances. Staff recommends that the applicants readdress the proposed landscape plan to ensure it complies with the above-described criteria. As presently proposed, the plan fails to comply with these criteria. The applicant should be required to submit a revised landscape plan for review. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system is designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughoutthe development. Safe Efficient and Aesthetically Pleasinq Circulation System Timber Ridge Village Apartments are located along the North Frontage Road. The North Frontage Road provides direct vehicular and pedestrian access to the site. A secondary form of pedestrian access is available to the site from Lions Ridge Loop. A series of pedestrian sidewalks and a shared fire lane/pedestrian path provides pedestrian circulation on the site. Vehicles will access the site in two locations; one at the main entrance to the parking garage and a second, at the west end of the building nearest the public transit stop. An enhanced public transit stop is proposed to be constructed to accommodate the anticipated significant increase in bus ridership. The public transit stop is designed to accommodate up to four buses at any given time (two east bound/two west bound). Special consideration should be given to the impact that this development may have on the Town's ability to provide convenient and efficient public transit services. More than 100 riders have been witnessed waiting at the transit stop during peak periods of the day and year. It should be reasonably assumed that these types of number will continue or increase. I-70 imposes a significant barrier to pedestrian movements north/south across the valley. To date, the Town has studied opportunities for constructing a pedestrian bridge over I-70 linking the development site to the south side of I-70. In studying the opportunities the Town has concluded that finding a location to land the south end of the bridge remains one of the greatest barriers to constructing the improvements as there is little to no area of public right of way. The improvements would have to be located on private property. Snow Storage „OU Four levels of the parking garage are enclosed and protected from the weather. The top �� deck of the garage, however, is exposed to the elements. As such, snow will accumulate on , the top during the winter months. As presently designed, no accommodations for snow� G�� / s t o r a g e o r s n o w r e m o v a l i s p r o v i d e d. S t a ff r e c o m m e n d s t h e a p p l i c a n t s r e v i s e t h e p r o p o s e � C � j� plans ensurin g that ade quate snow stora ge and snow removal is addressed. The current �� proposal does not comply with the Town's adopted regulations. n• Il� Cross Over Aisle Width ''C� Title 14, Development Standards, of the Vail Town Code, in part, prescribe minimum design standards for parking garages. According to Title 14, the minimum width of a cross over iJ,C.� aisle in a parking structure is thirty feet (30'). The purpose of this standard is to ensure ,�� adequate clearances for the flow and circulation of traffic. An inadequate flow and ��`� circulation of traffic results in decreased levels of service and functionality. As presently �L ��, designed, the parking garage has twenty-four foot (24') wide cross over aisles. Staff `�j� recommends the applicants submit written documentation from a qualified traffic consultant �v documenting the difference in level of service and functionality between the designed aisle width and the required width. This informatian will be used to evaluate whether the designed aisle width is acceptable. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. Environmental Impact Report An environmental impact report was prepared for the Timber Ridge redevelopment project in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail and submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and consideration. Chapter 5, Cumulative & Long-term Effects & Irreversible Environmental Changes, of the report entitled, "ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Timber Ridqe Redevelopment Proiect" dated January, 2010, prepared by Western Ecological Resources, Inc, of Boulder, Colorado, concludes the following: 5.1 Hydrology 5.1.1 Surface Water The proposed redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge would have no cumulative, long-term effect or irreversible environmental change on the surface water hydrology of the project site. 5.1.2 Ground Water The proposed development would have a slight, cumulative long-term effect or irreversible environmental change on the ground water hydrology of the project site due to dewatering of building foundations via underdrains. 5.2 Atmosphere The slight increase in hydrocarbon pollutants generated by the development and associated vehicular traffic represents a cumulative and long term effect. However, Kimley-Horn's traffic analysis conciudes that redevelopment of Timber Ridge would have an overall effect of reducing traffic within Vaii because employees would reside closer to their workplace. The majority of residents in Timber Ridge utilize public transportation. 5.3 Geo/ogy & Hazards The long-term risks presented by the rockfall hazard could be mitigated by any of the four conceptual options presented in HP Geotech's 2009 Geologic Site Assessment and Preliminary Rockfall Risk and Mitigation Study. After the feasibility analysis and preliminary cost estimates are completed, an option can be selected and further studies would be needed to develop more precise design specifications. 5.4 Soi/s Because this is a redevelopment project, it would not result in any new cumulative or long- term impacts to the native soil. As described in the Geotechnical Study completed by HP Geotech, the site is overlain by fill material from the initial development. � 5.5 Vegetation Resources The proposed project would create only a negligible long-term change in the plant community as areas of ornamental vegetation are impacted and replaced with similar ornamental vegetation. 5.6 Wildlife Resources The proposed redevelopment would not have any significant long-term impacts or irreversible environmental changes on wildlife resources. The site is already a high-density residential development, and there will be no change in land use or vegetation resources. 10 5.7 Noise Noise generated by the proposed development and associated vehicular traffic would create a slight cumulative and long-term environmental change, however given the proximity of the Interstate-70 corridor, this change will be negligible. 5.8 Visual Resources Redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge would create an irreversible change on the visua� resources of the area. However, this would be a positive impact because the aging buildings would be replaced with newer, updated buildings with an aesthetically pleasing architectural style that compliments other developments within the Town of Vail (Figure 11). 5.9 Land Use The proposed project would not result in changes to the land use as one high-density residential development will be replaced with a similar high-density residential development. 5.10 Circulation & Transporfation Long-term traffic estimates included in Kimley-Horn's Traffic Impact Study (2010) assume the entire Timber Ridge site is re-developed to include 700 units by 2025. Their analysis estimates the development would generate 77 new vehicle trips during the peak morning hour and 142 new vehicle trips during the peak afternoon hour of the peak winter ski season. Likewise there would be 337 new person trips during the peak morning hour and 424 new person trips during the peak afternoon hour on the public transportation system. Kimley- Horn reports that the full build-out may have a significant impact on the Town of Vail's public transit system and states that additional busses may be needed to accommodate this use. 5.11 Population �� The red , elo�ed apa \ r�t buildings will support a larger population, an increase estimated be e 352 and 522 e loyees. This represents a cumulative and permanent increase in th ulation_�f own. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other applicable plans. A component of the Vail Comprehensive Plan is the Employee Housing Strategic Plan that was adopted in September, 2008. The Plan outlines action steps forthe Town to achieve its deed restricted employee housing goal: "To ensure there is deed restricted housing for at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of Vail." Two objectives the Plan identifies is Vail's need to "keep up" with new deed restricted employee housing demand as it is created and the need to "catch up" with existing deed restricted employee housing deficiencies. The Town adopted Commercial Linkage and Inclusionary Zoning requirements for new development to ensure the amount of deed restricted employee housing keeps up with increasing employee demand. The Plan recognizes the Town has the unique obligation of catching up with existing deficiencies. The proposed redevelopment of the easternmost portion of Timber Ridge is the most significant opportunity the Town has to address existing deed restricted employee housing deficits. The following figures illustrate the challenge Vail faces in meeting its goal: 11 Vail's Deed Restricted Housinq Gap Existing Jobs 9,100 30% of Vail's Employees EHUS 663 Units Existing Deed Restricted Gap 6,100 Employees 1,830 Employees -1,094 Beds 736 Beds (emp. = more than 1 job) (avg. 1.65 emps/unit) New Employee Beds Arosa Drive Duplex 3.3 New Beds on average '/2 Timber Ridge Redevelopment 439 New Beds on average First Chair 42 New Beds Chamonix Neighborhood 92.4 New Beds on averaqe Remaining Deed Restricted Gap To Achieve the Goal 159.3 New Deed Restricted Beds VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS. VARIANCE Before acting on a variance application, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff Response - The proposed variance request allowing for retaining wall heights to exceed the maximum six feet of exposed wall face will h�ve little to no negative impact on the existing or potential uses in the vicinity. The site is bordered by public road rights-of-way on the north and south, the United States Post Office to the west, and a large-scale, multi- family development to the east. The visual impact of the proposed retaining wall will be largely shielded by the proposed buildings. The retaining wall will be most visible on the west end of the development site, adjacent to the remaining portion of the Timber Ridge development. The proposed wall is designed as to minimize any negative impact it may have on the future redevelopment of the western portion of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. As designed, the exterior surface of the retaining walls is intended to be colored shot-crete. A shot-crete surface is prohibited by the Town's adopted design standards and guidelines. An alternate exterior surface material shall be required prior to final design approval. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Staff Response - Staff believes there is a need to grant relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the retaining wall exposed face height regulation. The site was previously developed in a manner which has currently resulted in retaining wall heights 12 � that are in excess of the current Zoning Regulation requirements. With the physical configuration of the site being narrowest from north to south and the location of a 40-foot utility easement running east-west across the street frontage of the property, the development is confined to an even more limited building envelope by which to comply with the retaining wall exposed face height requirements. There has only been a small number of exposed wall face height variances granted within the Town of Vail. To date, they have been granted to mostly residential zoned properties on steep slopes. As the Code requirements regulating the exposed wall face height are an outcome of a more recent desired aesthetic preference of the community, previous developments did not have to comply with this regulation. One positive outcome of granting a variance will be the ability to create a more suitable surface for landscaping to be planted along Lions Ridge Loop on the north side of the building. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff Response - Staff believes that the requested retaining wall exposed face height variance will have minimal, if any, negative effects on the elements identified in the above criterion. The space between the proposed structure and the retaining wall will be properly illuminated to address any public safety issues or concerns. The request for a variance from the maximum retaining wall height standards prescribed in Section 14-6-7 of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail has minimal, if any, impacts on the above-described criteria. IX. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, FINAL PLAT Chapter 3, Major Subdivision, Title 13 Subdivision Regulations, of the Vail Town Code prescribes the review criteria for a request for a major subdivision. Pursuant to Section 13- 3-6, Final Plat, Vail Town Code, the criteria for reviewing the final plat shall be as contained in Section 13-4-2 of the Subdivision Regulations. According to Section 13-4-2C, Review and Action on Plat, "The Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the plat and associated materials and shall approve, approve with modifications or disapprove the plat within twenty one (21) days of the first public hearing on the major subdivision or the major subdivision will be deemed approved. A longer time period for rendering a decision may be granted subject to mutual agreement between the Planning and Environmental Commission and subdivider". The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to demonstrate that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of this Chapter, the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations made by public agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-3C above. The purpose of the final plat is to facilitate redevelopment of the site by creating two new lots and the necessary easements and allow for the future transfer of ownership of the property. As praposed, Lots C1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1 would be resubdivided to create Lots 1& 2 of the new Timber Ridge Subdivision. Upon creation Lot 1 � would be approximately 4.840 acres (210,830 sq. ft.) in size and Lot 2 would be 13 approximately 5.242 acres (228,342 sq. ft.) square feet in size. A reduced copy of the proposed final plat has been attached for reference (Attachment D). According to Section 13-3-4, Commission Review of Application; Criteria, Vail Town Code, "The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of the Chapter, Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations made by public agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-3C above. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the application and considerits appropriateness in regard to Town policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, environmental integrity and compatibility with surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, effects on the aesthetics of the Town." One of the basic premises of subdivision regulations is that minimum standards for the creation of a new lot must be met. This project will be reviewed under the Major Subdivision Criteria, pursuant to Section 13-3-4, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code. 1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistent with all the applicable elements of the adopfed goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the fown; and Staff Response - The Vail Land Use Plan identifies the property proposed for subdivision with this application as High Density Residential and states, in part, the following: "The housing in this category would typically consist of multi-floored structures with densities exceeding 15 dwelling units perbuildable acre." Further, the site was acquired by the Town of Vail in 2003 with the expressed purpose of preserving deed-restricted employee housing within the Town of Vail. The sole purpose of this subdivision request is to facilitate the redevelopment of a portion of the site for future deed restricted employee housing. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 2. The extent to which fhe proposed subdivision complies with alI of the standards of this title, as well as, but not limited to, title 12, "Zoning Regulations", of this code, and ofher pertinent regulations that the planning and environmental commission deems applicable; and Staff Response - The land included in this major subdivision proposal is zoned Housing District. The purpose of the Housing District is: "The housing district is intended to provide adequate sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other residential zoning districts. It is necessary in this district 14 to provide development standards specifically prescribed for each development proposa! or project to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as conditional uses, which are intended to be incidental and secondary to the residential uses of the district. The housing district is intended to ensure that employee housing permitted in the district is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the allowed types of uses. " Further, the proposed final plat has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable provisions of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations. Upon review, it has been determined that the proposed plat, with minor administrative corrections, complies with the requirements of the Vail Town Code. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion 3. The extent to which fhe proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient, workable relafionship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives; and Staff Response — The expressed purpose of the major subdivision application is to facilitate the redevelopment of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. Once subdivided, the easternmost 5.24 acres of the development site shall be redeveloped in keeping with the municipal development objectives of providing deed-restricted employee housing within the Town of Vail. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding area; and Staff Response — As the proposed subdivision is in compliance with the applicable provisions of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, future development in the areas surrounding the Timber Ridge Village Apartments will have little, if any, negative effects. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is /ocafed and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a"leapfrog" pattern of development; and Staff Response — The proposed subdivision is a resubdivision of five existing platted lots. As such, no extension to public utilities is required. While extensions are not required, upgrades and expansion of the existing services are required. Pursuant to the proposed development plan, the applicants are required to obtain roughly $90,000 worth of additional water rights for the property. The applicants are currently working with representatives from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (the "District") to execute a written agreement guaranteeing the District's ability to serve the Development Site. All other public utility companies have provided written sign-offs to the Town of Vail verifying their ability to serve the Development Site. 15 Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in comp�iance with this criterion. 6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve the planned ultimate population of fhe service area to avoid fufure land disruption to upgrade undersized lines; and Staff Response — All of the public utility providers supplying services to the subdivision and the Development Site were consulted and signed off on the ability to serve the Development Site. Final confirmation from the District is pending. Residential and fire flow calculations were analyzed and the appropriate upgrades to the water supply system have been identified on the proposed development plans. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 7. The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growfh of an orderly viable community and serves the besf interests of the community as a whole; and Staff Response — Timber Ridge Village Apartments were acquired by the Town of Vail for the expressed purpose maintaining deed restricted employee housing. To that end, the development site was recently rezoned to the Housing District. The sole purpose of the Housing District is to provide development standards to facilitate the development of deed restricted employee housing. The proposed major subdivision application is intended to facilitate the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. If approved, the future redevelopment provides deed-restricted housing for up to 930 employees. Pursuant to the Town of Vail Employee Housinq Strateqic Plan, "The Town of Vail (community) recognizes the need for housing as infrastructure the promotes community, reduces transit needs and keeps more employees living in town and will provide enough deed-restricted housing for at least 30 % of the workforce through policies, regulations, and publicly initiated development." Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, butnotlimited to, waterquality, air quality, noise, vegefation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features; and Staff Response - The proposed major subdivision will have minimal, if any, adverse impacts on the natural environment. This area has already been legally platted and subsequently developed. If approved, the subdivision merely re-subdivides five existing lots into two new lots. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 9. Such otherfactors and criteria as the commission and/orcouncil deem applicable to the proposed subdivision. X. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Development Plan 16 The Community Development Department recommends the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission, approves with conditions and modifications, the applicants' request to establish a Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, allowing for the redevelopment of an approximate five (5) acre portion of Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 352 new deed-restricted employee housing units. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria and findings outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented before the Commission. Further, staff recommends the approval of the Development Plan carries with it the conditions of approval described in Section X of this orandum. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section � VI f this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented before the Commission. Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the development plan with conditions and modifications, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings, "Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. 2. Proposed building setbacks provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. 3. Proposed building setbacks provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. 4. Proposed building setbacks result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. 5. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compafible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. 6. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. 7. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. 8. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system is designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. 17 9. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. 10. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other applicable plans. " Retaininq Wall Heiqht Variance The Community Development Department recommends the Town of Vail Planning & Environmentai Commission approves the applicants' request for a retaining wall height variance allowing for retaining walls to be constructed on the site which exceed six feet (6') in height. Staff's recommendation is based upon the evaluation of the criteria and findings outlined in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented before the Commission. Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the retaining wall height variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 1. "That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title." Final Plat The Community Development Department recommends the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission forwards a recommend of approval with conditions and modifications of the applicants' request of a major subdivision creating Lots 1& 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. Staff's recommendation of approval is based upon the review of the criteria and findings outlined in section IX of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented before the Commission. Further, staff recommends the approval of the Final Plat carries with it the conditions of approval described in Section X of this memorandum. Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommend of approval with conditions and modifications of the major subdivision request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings, "Upon review of the request for a major subdivision creating Lots 1& 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 18 1. That the su6division is consistent with the adopted goa/s, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town. 2. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas. 3. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. " Conditions of Approval For purposes of the following conditions of approval, the term "Developer" shall mean Vail Timber Ridge, LLC or its successors, the term "Town" shali mean Town of Vail and the term "Project" shall mean the development pian for the redevelopment of the easternmost portion of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. 1. Any approvals granted by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) shall only be effective upon the approval date of each of the three development application requests. Should one or more of the development applications be denied or fail to be approved, then none of the applications are approved and the proposal is denied in its entirety. 2. The Developer shail submit a revised set of drawings to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval depicting the rockfail mitigation fence along the south side of Lions Ridge Loop within the property boundaries of Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. The mitigation fence shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the regulations prescribed in Chapter 12-21, Hazard Regulations, of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. The revised set of drawings must fully complywith the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project. 3. The Developer shall submit a detailed waste removal management and operations plan specifically describing how waste and recycling will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 4. The Developer shall submit an executed deed restriction for Lot 2, Timber Ridge - Subdivision, approved by the Town of Vail, demonstrating compliance with Chapter 12- 61, Housing District, and Chapter 12-13, Employee Housing, Zoning Regulations of the Town Vail, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. The deed restriction shall be noted on the Final Plat prior to recording the Final PPat with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office. The deed restriction shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy on Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. 5. The Developer shall submit a revised architectural site plan and landscape plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval depicting a reconfigured fire lane/pedestrian pat,f�alignment which relocates trees from above the 19 location of the water and sewer lines, narrows the width of the fire lane/pedestrian path to 14 feet maximum in the spaces between the fire staging areas, delineates the pedestrian portion of the path from the bicycle portion and provide physical improvements that discourages vehicles from entering onto the fire lane/pedestrian path. The revised plans shall fully comply with applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the application for a building permit. 6. Thz Developer shall submit a construction staging plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval which addresses such matters as materials staging, construction parking plan, construction and occupancy phasing, temporary access, construction schedule, temporary utilities, traffic control, emergency access, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 7. The Developer shall record a revocable right of way permit for any and all private property improvements located with the Town of Vail right of way. Said permit shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 8. The Developer shall submit a Shoring and Excavation Plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, which addresses such matters as excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans, detailed profiles and cross- sections, existing utilities, materials storage, permanent and temporary easements, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 9. The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with the list of issues identified in the memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, dated March 16, 2010 and attached for reference (Attachment E). Said plans shall be submitted for review and approval and fully comply with all applicable regulations of the Town of Vail, pursuant to the date specified with the memorandum. IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Timber Ridqe Development Plan Application, date stamped March 11, 2010 C. Development Plan Set, date stamped March 11, 2010 D. Proposed Final Plat (Timber Ridge Subdivision), date stamped February 11, 2010 E. Memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, dated March 16, 2010. 20 � r� l:�J N � �'"'J i e� �i� � p��r�rr�en�.� Lc�t� 9-5., Sto�tc C, Li+a��rs Rrcfc�e� Fi�Fing� 9 (7280 lVarth Franfage Road West) ��°�� PL ��SuC,ject Property �J � Feet ,��F d.,�,.� w ,.a ,, e, .,�, ,. , � �. , a� ,�v ... ,ti m... ,,�.,�,,.rm „ : `L",;, Q 1S0 3Q4 G00 i� LcdM�dfi^��.Cccm_d�i.zV�3 7Rb�2�+_s. � TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan JANUARY 2010 Attachment B 1 EC IVE MAR 11 2010 TOWN OF VAIL r� C�J TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A licant Vail Timber Ridge LLC 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive El Paso, Texas Project Architect Humphreys and Partners Architects 5339 Alpha Road Suite 300 Dallas, Texas Consulting Architect Victar Mark Donaldson Architects 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard # 207 Avon, Colorado Civil En ineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, Colorado Land Plannin� Pylman & Associates, Inc. 137 Main Street, C107W Edwards, Colorado 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan C�� u TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Summary of Request 1 2.0 Existing Conditions 1 2.1 Timber Ridge History 1 3.0 Proposed Plan 2 3.1 Project Description 2 3.2 Utilities 3 3.3 Detailed Zoning Analysis 3 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation 7 5.0 Summary 11 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 3 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Summary of Request The purpose of this application is to provide information relative to a request for Development Plan approval for the proposed re-development of 5.24 acres of the existing Timber Ridge apartments. Timber Ridge is located at 1280 North Frontage Road. The legal description for the property is Lots 1 thorough 5, a resubdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C, Town of Vail, C0. The Town of Vail Zoning map designates Timber Ridge as Housing District (H). Development within the Housing District must receive Development Plan approval in accordance with the parameters and review criteria described in Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code. This application contains the information required by Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code to review and approve this application. 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 The history of Timber Ridge Timber Ridge was constructed in 1981 and remains the largest employee housing complex in the Town of Vail. The ten-acre site includes 198 two bedroom, one bath rental units in 16 buildings. Each unit is 745 square feet in size. The Town of Vail purchased Timber Ridge for $20 million in July of 2003. In 2005 the town issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a redevelopment of the property. Corum Real Estate Group was selected through this RFP process but mutually acceptable terms were not successfully negotiated. In July of 2007, anticipating a redevelopment of the property, the Town rezoned Timber Ridge to the Housing (H) District. In 2007 the town received an unsolicited redevelopment proposal from Open/Hillwood that was related to ongoing negotiations regarding redevelopment of the Lionshead Parking Structure. The discussions regarding Timber Ridge were terminated in March 2008. In December of 2008 the Town issued a new Request for Proposals seeking interested and qualified development teams to redevelop approximately one half of the property. This process led to the selection of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �' team. A development agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Timber Ridge LLC was entered into in October of 2009. The development agreement stipulates a redevelopment of the eastern half of the ten acre site and requires Vail Timber Ridge LLC to deliver 359 EHU's capable of housing a total of 570 beds. 3.0 Proposed Plan 3.1 Project Description The Vail Timber Ridge LLC team has a tremendous amount of residential housing construction experience. The members of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC team have been involved in the construction of over 70,000 units of residential, student and military family housing across the country. The VTR LLC team has taken the town's goals of creating a significant employee housing project on the Timber Ridge site to heart and have worked diligently to meet the town's density goals while designing a very livable and attractive building. The proposed design for Timber Ridge includes 352 apartments, 540 parking spaces and a 4,689 square foot resident's clubhouse. The building form is defined by the long rectangular shape of the site and is centered on the five story 522 space-parking garage. The garage entrance is approximately mid-point of the proposed building and the garage footprint is a relatively efficient 120' x 267' layout. The ground level of the garage will include trash facilities, bike storage, a mailroom and a large area of individual storage units. Each successive level of the garage will include trash disposal facilities and bicycle storage. The ground level and next three levels of parking are fully enclosed. The garage ramps up to an open air Sth level of parking. The 352 apartments are arranged in three separate but connected buildings. The separation of the buildings allows a complete wrap of three sides of the parking garage and also allows the buildings to step with the vertical grade changes of the site. The east building is a double loaded corridor courtyard design. The building ranges from three to five story elements as it wraps around the courtyards and extends on an east-west axis to abut the parking garage. The center building consists of a five story element of apariments running along 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �' the 270 feet of the front fa�ade of the garage. The rooflines and roof pitch of these units varies to create a townhouse type of appearance to this front elevation. An enclosed hallway between the parking garage and the units provides access to each apartment on each level. The west building is a similar courtyard double loaded design as the east building. Extending from the garage the building continues on an east west axis with two prominent courtyards in a five story form. While the site constraints and building program shape the overall building form, great care has been to introduce horizontal and vertical design elements that break down the building mass and scale and provide visual interest. A variety of rooflines and roof pitches, varied window placements and a variety of materials all add to the overall design concept. 3.2 Utilities Water and sanitary sewer mains are located adjacent to or on the site and appear to be adequate to serve the proposed buildings. Alpine Engineering, Inc. is the project civil engineer and will work closely with town staff and the utility service providers to ensure appropriate utility connections are designed and implemented. Natural gas, electric, television and telephone services are all available at the site. 3.3 Detailed Zoning Analysis The Housing District is intended primarily to provide for employee housing development opportunities. Due to the nature and varying characteristics of employee housing a housing oriented zone district was specifically developed and adopted into the Vail Land Use Code. The stated intent of the Housing District is to ensure that employee housing is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air and open spaces. A. Permitted Uses The only use proposed by the application is Employee Housing Units, which is a Permitted Use in this zone district. The other uses on site, parking and a 4,689 square foot clubhouse are support uses to the primary permitted use. The clubhouse will serve residents of the Timber Ridge complex and will not be open to outside memberships. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan L� B. Conditional Uses There are no conditional uses proposed by this application. C. Setbacks The required setback is the Housing District is twenty feet (20') from the perimeter of the zone district. The proposed plan meets and exceeds this setback requirement. D. Site Coverage The Housing District allows for maximum site coverage of fifty-five percent (55%) of the total site area. At the discretion of the Planning Commission this site coverage maximum may be increased if seventy five percent (75%) of the required parking spaces are underground or enclosed. Although the proposed Timber Ridge development plan meets this parking goal, there is no request to increase the maximum allowable site coverage. The site coverage of the proposed plan is 94,100 square feet, which measures to forty one percent (41 %) of the 5.24-acre site. E. Landscaping and Site Development The Housing District requires at least thirty percent (30%) of the total site area to be landscaped. The proposed plan includes a landscape area measured at 72,372 square feet, which equals thirty one percent (31 %) of the site area. F. Parking and Loading The Housing District, in recognition of the unique nature and characteristics of employee housing, allows for, at the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, a reduction in the parking requirements outlined in Chapter 10 of the Vail Land Use Code. This reduction is based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than required by Town Code. The applicant fully understands that Timber Ridge must be a fully functional project and that the parking must work for the residents. The design of the project includes a parking count that the applicant believes will more than adequately meet the needs of the residents. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 4 �"'"' The design of the parking at Timber Ridge, with 540 total parking spaces provided, 522 of these within the parking garage, allows for efficient management of access control. All cars will be registered with the management company and provided with an authorization sticker. Garage access will be controlled by a key card or similar control system. This will ensure that parking is made available for residents and will eliminate "poaching" of parking by outside users. The parking standards of the Town Code are, by nature, a generalist set of standards. Within the Village and LionsHead core areas parking is set at 1.4 spaces per residential unit. All areas of town outside of these core areas fall under Parking Schedule B. The parking requirement under Parking Schedule B for multiple family units is 1.5 spaces per each unit under 500 square feet and 2 spaces per unit for units between 500 and 2000 square feet. This standard is applied across the board, regardless of whether the units are in a triplex or in a 150 unit complex, is irrespective of location, proximity to transit or walkability to community services, and applies to units that may be seasonally occupied, used as full-time residences, used as vacation rentals or as second homes. The Housing Zone District was written in a manner that understands that these generalist standards may not be particularly applicable and allows for variations in these standards. As this is a site that is designed for local worker rental housing we can assume that most tenants will work within the Town of Vail geographic footprint. And it should be fair to assume that some tenants will be seasonal, some annual and some may live there for longer. But we can also assume that it is unlikely that a tenant will live there for the long term. It is unlikely that a child will enter pre- school and graduate from high school while living at Timber Ridge. Tenants on a short term basis (even a few years) may have little need for multiple car ownership. Timber Ridge is located within 9/10 of a mile from a grocery store, a hardware store, a sporting goods store, other retail shops, restaurants and bars. Timber Ridge is also located within 8/10 of a mile from the Lions Head I-70 Overpass, which provides access to all of Lions Head. These distances are well within comfortable walking distance for a fit and active population. Timber Ridge is a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). There is an existing bus stop at Timber Ridge and the proposed design includes an improved bus stop area that will allow for additional buses to serve Timber Ridge. The Town of Vail and ECO Transit bus systems both serve Timber Ridge. Timber Ridge residents can easily access any and all services within the Town of Vail, (social, medical, educational, government, employment, shopping, recreation) and via the ECO Transit system may utilize transit to visit down valley locations. A key tenet of Transit Oriented Development is high density and a reduction in 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �"" parking demand. Walkability and TOD are considered key factors to sustainable development. A speaker at a recent Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute land use/sustainability conference stated " In Europe land use and transportation planning strives to house and transport people. In America we strive to house people and their cars and strive to transport their cars." Timber Ridge is an example of a project that by virtue of its location, its target resident demographic and the high quality Town of Vail transit system, can fully function with a reduced parking standard. If we are to create sustainable, transit oriented development we must, as a society, discourage automobile use and encourage and enable walkability and transit opportunities. This is not inconsistent with recent Town of Vail policies to encourage local residents to use alternatives to peak season parking use of the Village and LionsHead Parking Structures. Town of Vail bus ridership has been experiencing significant growth, perhaps as a result of these parking policies. The parking requirement for Timber Ridge is detailed in Parking Schedule B of the Vail Town Code. Parking Schedule B requires 1.5 parking spaces for residential units of less than 500 square feet and 2 parking spaces for units between 500 and 2,000 square feet in size. The parking requirements for the 352 units are as follows: 22 units (less than 500 square feet) x 1.5 spaces per unit = 33 spaces. 330 units (between 500 — 2,000 square feet) x 2 spaces per unit = 660 spaces This totals a parking requirement of 693 spaces. The proposed plan includes 522 parking spaces in the garage and 18 surface spaces for a total of 540 spaces. This equates to an average of 1.53 parking spaces per unit. The applicant is requesting a reduction in the parking standards of approximately 22%. G. Other Development Standards In the Housing District the development standards of lot area and site dimensions, building height and density control shall be as proposed by the applicant, as prescribed by the planning environmental commission. A. Lot area and site dimensions This application proposes redevelopment of a part of Lot 2 and all of Lot 3, 4 and 5, a subdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C. This entails 5.24 acres of the approximately 10-acre Timber Ridge site. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan �"' The site is 885 feet in length along the North Frontage Road and is 233 feet deep at its east end and approximately 300 feet deep at the western boundary. A lot line adjustment to Lot 2 will be completed prior to construction on the site. B. Building Height The proposed building includes 3,4 and 5 story elements and steps vertically with the side grade on both the east-west and north-south axes. The highest ridgeline measures at 76 feet, 9.5 inches above grade with several architectural projections extending above this height. The rear five story element measures at 70 feet, 10.5 inches above grade. C. Density Control In October of 2009 Timber Ridge LLC and the Town of Vail entered into a development agreement that outlines the parameters of the proposed redevelopment of the 5.24-acre portion of Timber Ridge. This agreement stipulates a density of 359 Employee Housing Units capable of housing 570 beds. Minor changes in building massing and height have resulted in a minor density reduction to this number. The density proposed by this application is 352 Employee Housing Units. 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation The Housing District describes six criteria that shall be used by the staff and planning and environmental commission as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. Those criteria and the applicant's response to each follows below: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. Applicant's response: The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is located between the North Frontage Road and Lion's Ridge Loop in West Vail, with all site access via North Frontage Road. This stretch of the North Frontage Road is, in general, home to the largest concentration of large buildings in the West Vail 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan region. East of Timber Ridge is the relatively large Vail Run and Simba Run buildings. Immediately west of these buildings, adjacent to the east boundary of the proposed redevelopment parcel is the smaller scale Savoy Villas. West of Timber Ridge is the US Post Office facility, the site of the recently approved Roost Lodge redevelopment and the large scale Vail Commons, City Market, Safeway and West Vail Mall Buildings. Timber Ridge has several attributes that make the site appropriate for high-density housing. Direct access off the North Frontage Road removes any traffic impact from secondary streets and smaller scale residential neighborhoods. This same attribute allows for extremely efficient and high intensity transit service. The site is centrally located to allow reasonable walking distance to both Lionshead and the West Vail commercial district. The hillside behind Lions Ridge Loop is too steep to allow development so there are no immediate neighbors to the north and no view impacts to any other residential properties. Savoy Villas, located just east of Timber Ridge is oriented toward views to the south, over I-70 and to the southeast towards Vail Mountain. Timber Ridge is one of the very few sites in town available for high- density employee housing that can take advantage of these attributes. The building architecture has been carefully designed to reflect the characteristics of the general historic and current trends of mountain design. In addition the building incorporates multiple design elements that mitigate the mass and length of the building. The courtyard design allows for significant interplay of the horizontal elevation of the street frontage while completely eliminating the visual impact of a 522 car parking garage. The varied building heights of the courtyard elements and the varied aspect, pitch and style of roof elements create the appearance of smaller building forms. Timber Ridge LLC believes the proposed design is an appropriate and positive expression of the desired density is fully compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. The proposed Timber Ridge plan provides buildings and improvements that have been specifically designed to produce a functional development plan. The significant amount of required parking has been hidden from public view yet is a functional and convenient facility for the residents. Unit access and pedestrian circulation is primarily within the enclosed building. Unit floor plans are efficient and livable. Laundry facilities are included within each unit. A nearly 5,000 square foot clubhouse provides a very functional and attractive amenity for the residents. The site itself, as discussed elsewhere in this application, may be the best available high density residential employee housing opportunity in the Town of Vail. Frontage Road and transit stop improvements are responsive to the site and the neighborhood. The building massing on the east end is meant to be responsive to the only residential neighbor. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is currently home to 198 two-bedroom apartment units in 16 buildings, with extensive surface parking and site retaining walls. The proposed redevelopment site of 5.24 acres includes 106 of those existing units. The existing development has already impacted the original natural features of this site. The proposed plan does maximize opportunities for access and use by the resident public by the design of the courtyard spaces. The courtyard design performs the dual function of providing a significant break in the front fa�ade of the building and also, in response to this criterion, provides a location for functional and aesthetic public spaces. The courtyards have varied landscape design themes that include a plaza for intimate public gathering spots, barbecue and fire pit areas and outdoor spas. The work session format with the planning and environmental commission, along with staff input, has resulted in revisions to the project that are extremely beneficial to the landscape design. Previous plans included a 24-foot wide driveway with parallel parking 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan spaces all along the front of the building. This resulted in a significant width of asphalt and a difiicult landscape design problem. The current plans have reduced this large expanse of asphalt to a 20 foot wide combined bike path and emergency vehicle access lane. This change in vehicular circulation had opened up more area available for landscape planting and results in a much improved landscape design. The grading at the north elevation of the building has also been revised. The back wall of the parking garage will now serve as part of the retaining wall system. This allows the entire back wall of the parking garage to be filled to the road grade. A level landscape area now exists between the garage and Lion's Ridge Loop and significant landscape planting has been incorporated into the plans. This eliminates the unsightly rear wall of the garage and creates a 270 foot long landscape island that will serve to visually separate the east and west wings of the building. Overall the landscape design represents a tremendous improvement over existing conditions and provides a very functional and meaningful open space and landscape design. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. Timber Ridge is located along the North Frontage Road and the town bicycle and pedestrian path has been designed to pass through the site on Timber Ridge property. The bike path through the site is designed as a 20-foot wide path that will also serve as an emergency vehicle access. Sidewalks along the building provide access to all entryways and connect to the bike path and to the adjacent bus stop. Vehicular access and circulation is direct and efficient. The North Frontage Road will be improved with acceleration and deceleration turn lanes at the primary vehicular access to the parking garage. Cars will enter the site and directly access the centrally located parking garage. A second vehicular access is shared with the bus stop and provides access to the remainder of the existing Timber Ridge units and to 18 surface parking spaces that will serve short term, business office and drop off needs. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 10 �"' implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. A full environmental impact report has been completed for the proposed proj ect and evaluated as a part of the design process. The recommend mitigation measures include improvements to the North Frontage Road to allow for appropriate turning movements and several alternative rockfall mitigation options. The applicant and the Town of Vail will work together towards the final design and implementation of these mitigation measures. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other application plans. The Timber Ridge site has been the largest employee-housing complex in Vail since its construction in 1981. The Vail Comprehensive Plan and all of the other applicable long range planning documents and guiding documents recognize this land use as appropriate in this location. A necessary criterion for the 2007 re-zoning of the property to the Housing District was compliance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan and all other applicable plans. This positive re-zoning action serves as affirmation that the proposed land use is in compliance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan. This application for redevelopment of approximately half of the existing Timber Ridge complex does not represent a change in land use, but is a change in the physical arrangement and intensity of that existing land use. As such, this application remains in full compliance with all applicable Town of Vail comprehensive planning documents. 5.0 Summary The Town of Vail has determined, through the 2008 Employee Housing Strategic Plan, that the policy of the Town of Vail will be "To ensure there is deed restricted housing far at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of Vail. This goal will be met by policies and actions that (1) ensure new development keeps up with this goal , and (2) development projects sponsored by or in partnership with the Town to "catch up" to meet this 30% goal. The Town has initiated several actions. The buy down program has added five units and the Arosa Drive duplex will provide a great ownership � opportunity to two local families. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 11 � _ �' � But to really make progress in the "catch up" arena a development of significant density is necessary. The Timber Ridge site has the physical and locational attributes to allow for this site to be the best opportunity for the Town of Vail to create a significant increase in deed restricted beds within the community. Vail Timber Ridge LLC believes that we have addressed the program request of the Vail Town Council with a building and site design that is appropriate to the location and the neighborhood and meets all of the criteria required for Housing District Development Plan approval. This proposed redevelopment of a portion of Timber Ridge will provide a tremendous community benefit. 2010 Timber Ridge Development Plan 12 I V � �� g i� �� a� �3 L �� r F � � � � �- VAIL TIMBER RIDGE 1280 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL COLORADO, 81657 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 3 THROUGH 5 AND A PART OF LOT Z, A RESUBDNISION OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION BLOCK C, SITUATED IN A PART OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO. ', .., � ' ; ��17 � ��. ��}�u� � w�. � �:..�' � a �� _...�. iir� �I,p�°a.;� —�. OWNER: VAIL TIMBER RIDGE, LLC. �r �Y ,I, '�"I I I ��il l �� S /�� } " �rI IV h �r.... : / � & x a.. � I �\ ' � /� ' _'I� � uu .� . �.... . �� . �/ i � ; - - ,. � � �: � @ � .:: ... �� , �� . �# ,� ep . . . " � �r�� ■�r � .. �� ,e, I i.= � : n � � � �..- � ; _ �, �,.. �:� �_ �•� �o-_,_� � I.t�� -� ..��. �- � ��' .T ? � , , W K. , � � " ,_ ;�«.a�.�. �. _, _ _�g�.� CHARACTER ELEVATION ARCHITECT: HUMPHREYS & PARTNERSARCHITECTS, L,P. 5339PLPHAROADSTE300 ' DP1IAS.TEXAS752A0 (9T21701-9Gi6 " (9721 701-9 6 3 9 FAX �PLVS • IRVINE - NEWORLEAKS • ORLAN00 � ARCHITECTURAL � ��- ROOIi HiL� RON ]q1E!#�RAN__ _ ... .. ILEWN-GROIRlUROOR ...._ __. GXd.M-ROORPLW'R' Gli(IUID-RDOIiRNl4 GNOIM-ROORRANC sccom-noonww•�• scaro-vwoRVw1s sEOao-nnoarinnc �ww.nx�snoaa mw.amxnµ•�• nno.noanwwa Rw-ROqiPLW'C ICERIN-faURfNFL00R .__ — fdNIH-ROdt4lAN•A' . FWXIH-ROOIiRAHB' FWIITI-ROqi RAN t' ILENAM-FiPIFl.00F.. _—_.. ____. ._. ...... . _-._ . FIFlX-ROORRAN'R' FIFlH-0.0pN RNi 4 FIF1N-RN' RRAN'C ICEftN1-NOCf —.... ROOFPLW A' ROOFRN!'B' .... _. __- �� CIVIL ER SIIFET ,x,ccaoncNSA.n__ _ . . . ... . . cooE �norrm�narl �+• —w•,�� cm� wcuaowvw�c� �A &4o.EUNIMOI �� pR��p W15 SELt1016 ��..,�a�� m _._ __. � cros i.a,e�cwuLmau r�.rou.mw�c�wcua..F s azi arwcwutA+au PRO.IECI9LOPE: WLt YNMYSIpA15F wxmex�s.npqww�xoM�su`9ant�vuwo CM2 YNMYS�OPYSF °`""� caa n�avsa�ase zar1mcas�wcr cos� _wwrNUnw �1°°'� au ..-wwvunmw occur�xcraisssrwnox mxm�crionirac casa wmuntrrw ou6.t eui�c!nr'c�a au cano�+co+osron srar�rinmsn a�w�r,�una�.rrEw, L063 RVLCFMHGEROSIC ,unauncrra�umivaswaana�srs�a cm.� m.ic�nor1cwosp �x6tx[lnxoaarsmiW¢t�tru�Ea�xaei96rp.nH[ (Di.t WVtYmOTIAY( �assm�s�.n.,�m�wu�an�emEm�eruc arz �wvrvCOOruvt NLOVI�&F&IrtMIGNEA COE FAbBB/�P CYA1 111N11HG I � WK TLL4TIq1lIIGI C0.S LOrHME euno� .ma°fi.n"n ' �u� � s` n.°'i0'moss � �,�..amv • � : � sssu .� _. _ _.. __ _ `� � — — -- �� . �; � �� i ._...._._ _-... _______ avn�m _ _ avn�m avnna � a _ awma_ a . _. _-- ovnno R oynno ._ _._. .. . _--- mnim. oanvio aunno x+manx+ avnno �i+aaav _. .aini�io �rnaww avnno :oHrnaww avnno ww----- av_nno �ww ___- _ a✓+mo 1 IX411H0 �EMB115 IX4f1110 — —__._._. ... �uais av�ino oyitnv -- -- � _ . _ ___ - - --� - LANDSCAPE w e P � s .� i ia e . a . u � . � . u ul . u� - u� �, u� . u� . u� L1 YNWYWaSfiWEflN1 — -- .._._. _ �.z o�w�mw�aenai ia e`w,m�wosarEnw+ LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP .. ,*,`�'�L�P �� '"�� .. P.I.C.: GREG PAULKNER � � "� . " ARCHITECT OF RECORD: ROBIN BELLERBY, AIA ^r � �� II' ��I � � � , �� ;� ��: ,��.� � � ��,; � - �` r ;� � , �_� �: ��' . ��, ,� �r�� CONSULTNGARCHRECT LIFESAFETY CML STRUCTURAL MEP UNDSCAPE CONTRACTOR CITYGOVERNMENT VICTOR MARK DONALDSON SFUWER LIFE SAFETY ALPINE ENGINEERING, INC. INTEGRITY STRUCNRAL CORP. BURY r pqRTNERS, INC. hpla JORDAN CONSTRUCTION TOWN OF VAIL ARCHITECTS SQtVICES muceu�snc�aw..su��en noxaRnisirnaw..surrtnm v.aaacn imrwrFSnao.surrt.� mwesraxmsm¢r.eurteao �unuxdn.su�.m eesamnue�� ssm�ru�aow nva+.coe�am �co.meowa mxwros.wei� xousrox.n�nom i+.s�m.nc�eroi auusrnisa ,e.,s,ao vu.coeiur Ya�eaE�4�J0� � �'��9oet wfE:�BAI�n 'AICEf�I�� aKE �� t 'AI�:�;�� :RNIlq191� WLE:I�ISSO�soN FucM%�BSfO F.K'F1�1t4Aa �� CONTACT: MARK WNALDSON CONTMT: UEBORAN SFiANER WNTACT: GLENN PALMER CONTACT: JOHN CAULSON CONTACT: DORAN MCMAHON CONfACT: DAN ERLAN0.50N CONTAC7: LEE i}i01MS CANTACT: MARTIN HAEBERt.E uw��w�a..� ar�+..,�e�w oua:or,.o�a�mm �w+.-id.�anutir+w.r� oui�ps�w.� ava:�� oau�.�.py�m. ou�.+..n.e9.�..� a4�M GRMFL� � usM rrraxoc ROBNBflIERBt R� � � i � " € °��a �� i � �_� �� o � O � J � N � am Q 0 z9 � �o � � O pwp U Z Q � $> J Q � � � � ., i' �� i_S �: �� M��bOeuetl epYahYeVpaYn mmNrim. � � 1 �� 9�o J ? y �� g� _ �� Y �� a�@� � �� :ro��ens Ea s�Er � � � O � = • � � '"'�. � �+e� i t� '`s z.aa� ��g-:� �k i � a..x..A !� � c�� -�� ;:.-� �� F� � . c.ls.i F^�� e� �`�-�� T 4� �, � � � � ��q� � � V� � Attachment C r L � i� �� a� �R � ° i o ° O - � ._e � � o �p I � . p �p� � � � � o ii p � n == I =_ �� G I . � � - � •.. �'�.. - - UNR A3' TYPE A' 650 S.F. (GRFA) UNIT B}ALT11 I 647 S.F. (NETJ 931 S.F. (GRFl� UNR Bt-ALTi 926 SF. (NEn �NR �'�n 785 S.F. (GRFA) UNR Bt UNR A3-ALTB �' --- 931 S.F. (GRFA) 876 S.F. (GRF/Q 650 S.F. (GRFA) � " _-.'. - - �'_._... 782 S.F. (NEn 812 S.F. (NE� 641 S.F. (NEn 926 S.F. (NE� e � - p - Q � p � O � -- � � o 0 -- � t o i� � • � � _ i � � C, _ . . . ..... � — UNRA3ALT5 650 S.F. (GRFA) UNIT A3 UNR 83ALT9 UNR B7-ALTS � J -� 647 S.F. (NET] 650 S.F. (GRFA) 973 S.F. (GRFA) 816 S.F. (GRFA) � 647 S.F. (NE'� 969 S.F. (NEn UNR B3ALT7 812 S.F. (NET) I UNR A3QTN � 650 S.F. (GRFA) � 931 S.F. (GRFA) i 647 S.F. (NE� _ _.__ __._. __----- ---- - _ 92fiS.F..(NE�---__.. � ._ . .. _...-------- � � ----_.._---- � ------ - - -- -.. ___—_ . ._.____ . ._.._.__. � I - a , 6 � 8 I � O - � _ 6 � � � • � ` � _ -- ° � � r- i — � • ,' . _. '�. L. ..l � � � 1 _ _ � . ,�. ,i � I il �. UNITAIALT4 UNR A3-ALT10 650 S.F. (GRFA) � 973 S.F. (GRFA � 9�3 S.F. GRFA 872 S.F. N � 650 S.F. (GRFA) B47 S.F. (NE� _ B3 -- ( � UNRB1-ALTI UNITA2 UNIT 63-ALTB 876 S.F. GRFA 647 S.F. (NETJ � 969 S.F. (NET) (� � I' 530 S.F. (GRFA) 969 S.F. (NEn !, 527 S.F. (NE� '' V � " �p a e o ° - o � ° ', i�T' ° � o , � -- , � � a�f l ; � o � « I ; - ' UNR A3-ALT3 m �I, - 650 S.F. (GRFA) 647 S.F. (NEn UNIT BY•ALTt I UNR A3-ALT9 � UNR B3-ALP � S.F. (GRfA) I 650 S.F. (GRFA) 973 S.F. (GRFA � S.F. (NEn UNIT 87-ALT7 '�, 647 S.F. (NEIj UNRM-ALT7 969 S.F. (NEn 816 S.F. ((iRFA) ' 393 S.F. (GRFA) 812 S.F. (1� . 397 S.F. (NEf) � \ O ^ O .# 8 0 G��i �o �� i 8 - . � . __. � � � �.� , � � � ❑ u 0 O ! ' I _ � . �...... r . _i - . UNITBIALT6 - �� UNRA3ALi8 � 931 S.F. (GRFA) UNIT B2-TYPE A ' 650 S.F. (GRFA) UNR A3-ALT2 � -- 926 S.F. (NE� 895 S.f. (GRfA) UNR Bt-AL72 '��, 647 S.F. N 650 S.F. (GRFA) UNR A1-TYPE A' 893 S.F. (NE� 785 S.F. (GRFA) I (� 647 S.F. (NEn 393 S.F. (GRFA) _. ------- ---_ ._. __.._ _._. __ _. 782S.F.(NE� ', 391S.F.1� i i � � a �� , �. � o - r.�, '� o � ct o � r ° b' � � I � ,� _ ' r , - - __ � � c' � � � i , m - - ] i ' - i m ` � - UNR B3-ALT5 UNR B2 UNR B7-AL71 UNR 0.}ALT7 UNR A3-ALTt U_NR A7 931 S.F. (GRFA) 895 S.F. (GRFA) 785 S.F. (GRFA) 650 S.F. (GRFA) 650 S.F. (GRFA) 393 S.F. GRFA 926 S.F. (NE� 893 S.F. (NEn 782 S.F. (NEn 64T S.F. (NEn 647 S.F. (NEn 397 S.F. (NEn ) i , r r � � - � ;s % �- - . ��'x, � � � � � �� ,.� 0 �o � � / SCALE 1'=/V-0' o � � �� j� � ARCHI�ECTURAL SITE PLAN // � � / . ��' �� i � � I L � WrrM �� . _ r.,.,� �� I � �: �� ;� ;� i� :� �, U J J W C:i 0 � � w m � f= a > -�'i ie�sb d�� Mmtl �IOI� R � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5' � )1 a�J �. ':� � ..a... r � � � r i � i IL__—_________—__—__J �- 71�� ,. � !�� - �r;� � � � ■�!�!� ��'� � � �� u4�M � � EXITING CODE SUMMAR� LEGEND - EGRESS PLAN �::... �a�. ow�o :�,.,.� � , -- oe�cmwa�ssmnva .....r,r, roµE.p,..�,�..,,�,.»e��=,m�.,�a CI �rsncxoar .m...� M • " ' ��I NtlU20f/fllO�f ar�m wmr�wEwwwarara. �� CI NOF%R NuMa+naww�� w��uimmreumuaaa�oauuffrnno�wna OE&APIqNOFP0011 no++nvnmea�euwic.. � HUEOFROOAI � �w�i�++��wv��e OCGWIMLMDFKROR �•++°nan.ea.w NHB920FOC4VPNlIS p��ro�swm��.w , aaw apw.rarvvur.� ti�em�� aauw r� � or�vr�n ion a vuw w�oaw wria mwi z �eewmn OE3RFfIp10FE(YIESSCp.P11ENf m,ti�y�rmaer.�sur wa�aroonovw�mwFwm�r�v�wueE wriw�a�ruwre� fAID00f1 Ef#SSWIPQENf �.'wawn..xa�v..4nr. rn�urtoow.v�e.�roE�n..rvnwexm�nxro�omswnsrc e80LC%015=689 REqIfi�WfWDTH waw.�w�s�.mwr. �..�..�,�..M6�,��a,�,.,E..,�, e.m<sraEwwmn� —casw,u�oFVmvroix .w......�..��.�.. ,�«a�„�a.�.�.�.a�,.�.�.�,�,�.�.�.w.. Honru�nooan ,--...00rnran�c o.�r.. �ow��.�. �°.°.."`lo'�: �� .�"' .- .. ..._ w, �. a. d,� �,�.�.o,� ..�TM �. �..«u .,.G .,� ..-:. o�sa�axaovrsruemwa�a o�.�,,..�.�.�..c,w�.,w�w.�amo.�.a.o. sruaz ��( srursru�BBt qiAIRC4PACM) . ...{—ICIWLSTM1YlU1H — M116EF OF OCCUPMli9 NLdAID cruuusE: —�nukran,emocoaw,wrs �� .� 4 �; �� n�� e�� w � O � J ' � � m W �y (�j m (7 LY a O � Z � �' _.wr�� _. '. � __ �__ .._.... _. ___ ________� �O � _ "'_ - t , _ I �,.� `____________ ________ __ _________ _� - F O - ------- - '. `- . ._ . :_� , - � > � � �" '. " _ ' .�;� � �"� � �-- zJ H . � � � �� r � � � � � , .. ' �--' � — y J ' ." __.. ,._--~- . � . - . � iwv�eat p , � � � j � ,,- ., -T__� � • -t-+}- "_—. �� `G- -___-_ ___ - . _,= �',r � � 'a .� � r , � -- _ - _— r � � �. � r� , h > � �.. { ' , ; , � M d � . , . •. - � � � ' '- - - { {� . _ r "_ V � �i., ��. �. . +�6jj� ... " - :::� ��- � � � . i \, r� �1 -,_-7_ L „e� _ �_ _ 6�� v � "-�I l ---- --- --- -+�°'s"C'°o-"O� ----Y� ---- m"-"-" -`"-'�"-`""----- -' I ,. _ `��:� I ,.��-� Q, � . j _ �'• ` -- � � ��s"' � ' �i - I � - . �., � , , - � ; � � `� : w.n � a ..-- 'B I �J . � - � i �q�'.:I�i � �m-� i - � /; __ �✓.. � � . 4 - � �� , . J�/ .c f n� , `LJ a .,. , •• � b� � C " � P��4'� � �T,� �,� y' ,e x.m..�o " � : . '. , ` ,r '- - --, " �j� f�\�` �c � - , . i � '�' li � _ - � • - � � ' � . � a 1 i -- , . " , � ..�.-- �i 3 ' i ' — r -----' ' ! �_ • �, - --- ¢� � ; ��. � �. - - u,.,� w:;. o �-- ��_ N , � _ A! � � If a.,,, � a� o � e � a � - u � .� —.._ ' . � ; ', m.,,,; o �- _ �- =o..,,, —_ _ _I � F Y , 0 ' � -� � : ,. � � � °� : � � ' _ _ _ - . , _ �_,., - -- --- __ :� �; � - _ .-- ' � -- =-=— —�-- --- �,�, � _- ., �— �;,,,, � _— . � � �.......� .�. . � _ -- a,� ..,. � . � o� o... .� _ _ �,..�.� . _ , . , � —, ��.� � _ - �- �� : . > � . �� ..---= " � --� °.� a _ �, F � ; � � �a< _ � . ,.__ _ - � _.-. � _ �..�._._. - --- - � _� �,. _, _ .. -_-. . _,_ _ r� `°-_ . - � �� 4� }8 ag� f5y . ..._ �sl .,__ � � � x <-... � _� _ _... ...._. . -. _.__ __ � ° _ .... .._.e� w -- �� . S- _ � -,.� _ a N - � �_.._ � U �� J _". ..� ,.,@ � .�- .�. ._. '. - ' -_ ,.,._ _.. _ �W� �� _. _.. _ - .s._c __ -�_ �. _ _ _ W=�� - - -_ --- • -- _.__ . -- -- � _ _ -- -- ' " ' � __ _ -- __ �¢�� _ _ _._ _ � °� SCALE: 1'=71f-0' p � � � .� ��LOUND FLOOR EGRESS PLAN _ __ _ �,•_�d cna,No FLOOREGRESSPLAN — A2.10 _._ :.. :. 0� ._' � i g� R� e9 �B �� : W� i �� EXITING CODE SUMMARY LEGEND - EGRESS PLAN �:.-. �+�+ e.�.. owv,u «�.�.�.R .:'-- w�craaoFECaessrn��a .�.+«.�. rn roµE...w�,��.,�w.,o��MTMa � vamnuoor .o...�.. • � H� xa¢mruoar 1=J �a�' ��E�� o �� .�... �..��.��,�.�.,�..._�m� �„�� .�: �,� �� r�..�.s�..�.�.. 0 ��, :w. �,�.;� . OCGIPANfLQdDfACfQt et` sorw��.mr�m MRBENOFOCq1PANiS �p°�io+"+�1ti+oe�� nwe� wr�em�nm ��maon OE9tlmfI0N0iEGf1ESSCpPJNEM ro�qr�m.a.nur x�iqw��i�ina ��a�a F%ffWOrt - E(AESSCOAPOH�R .r,�en aacc.xo.n,e.0 ...aEOUwmewrrmn� ••, am szaEwvnom --cam�una+aoarwom �� •"••^ �u��••��'v^,�� Noniu�noarn ti . . ooannn� g�.,...«o�,..,�.�.o�.m.,��,m�,o.�,. oesavnaaoorsruemuva+ert �� p�' '�� FIRST FLOOR EGRESS PLAN � scuF:,•=xo� i: �� i€ i� :� �� €� �� €� 6� U J J W U � K � W m � H J Q i �L�' i �.Ra � e�w.e �� aa �S �$ �� x N 11 — a i €`g �� 3s �� I� �� I �, 1° i. � u 0 � �... �� EXITING CODE SUMMARY LEGEND - EGRESS PLAN �.;,... �a� oswyo .. owecnoxaF�ssm��va .„,,,,�, m ro...pr,.o.o„cw.n�.....owo.a.�nw.,a � vortiatwr •�a• »� ••,� � 'ron¢a+ru oar s� ..�.��u�ms..rt.. �o � aoour M�� .�.... . . oesrnvriaacaow a..:e.,,,��,,,°pY°.,, e,;:.. ,Em.,�..,�m,�� no�.�a ..�.,.. � rwnEaaaow �... a'..�w�e accuvurt�a�ov�craa �°'�'°••�'°iyY"i°•'•• b°L:�e.: �: mn�+aFOCarwns ::�d....,..w>�...+ ' ..m"°a...� ..°M:"�m,� uewmn OES4AWfI0HOFEfAES3WIF01ENf s.,p��.�Mm,m.ewrur awunasuv..ciw.a.�m+�wrv�rmu.f EOTOOOR --EGRESSWIIPONBif /60CC%O15 Bbt PEqIF�WTWD7H wr� n 6A9 9'ClF/JiWD1N �-CONFNMNTIONOfW�VlIOTH ��+r NOILMlEO Wdi �v WOf1MT4lG A"` OESCRIPIIONOFE%IfSfARC011PxlF)iT om.�s.x¢�eemmx'orc�vwrziaoasswuoxErFmora SfRIFYADTH M.� -ILIWLMSi�YIDTM sraacwic�r: ::. -- raueei a oauvwrtsr�uoxm 1L'fUALl5E - IiCiWLM1NBEROFOCCUPNRS � � � ' 4 � � � " � . �� s w ' � O � -J �� W � m C7 � a O � W o� � m �o � ��om _ � U � � Z Q ~ f ` � u u � u u �� .,' , I _::_ _ . �� _ _ � ... � � > �_ � , ., �.�c c N K N - — ° ' ' : _ -< . . - •�. "' N �- u u .� � R �� ..a .�. ,.s. .s ..� - . ; - ._�_ `- .k__� _, .. �....— - -- :. _ b w..o�n �. � r.oe . �`+ ..�. .: . _ �� _ � _ � l �ll� , man�:y _'._..__..._._.. ., , - r ._ _. . —'- - — � -- -- - - --- "-- "' .�� . � � , ; . � i . �. : � • �.' _ � ... , .. �.�:e::.� .. .. � I� .� - . .,. �. �, - - ._ .. , � �, , . .. , „ ��f�oM.ibs ' �y __-' : _. ,.. '_... _ .___ ... R � R I . .... .. �'- C�_ � M ,-� � . _ � .4 � . . I .��g�"" �m ' ,�R,�,,��, �� "° 'ai �"�'; � �� .�_ �_ � _ � � ,.�,,,� ' I (4 _� � �� / � __ � : � � �° a f ,�«�, � � � � � � � � �` � � � � �" �,„„ Z'= � ,� ' / � � <<. � � .a � : ,- , �. - .� , "'��,�� ; �� :� , . . ,�..�..,� -:- ..�...---- �--- - - _ ___ '_. -....---� �r... ..�- -- - �� ma� B e� a e a e �__e � �> � s '- � u� , : � .� _� �a , , , � � - � � � "° � ., � � � ___ O � ir�Wi .._.�.°."_. �...= � � vy� � � � W � � �X � � �� S; ��o� °+S U � e'. - . �E �'°�'�' SECOND FLOOR EGRESS PLAN } � � � � � � I� 1 scue r=pa w x � g o m �a ar � e �# � � a �° �� _ � � �� sECOrvo noon EGRESS PI.W - A2.12 - � �� s a� �� I:. I. IXITING CODE SUMMARY �.�7"R,�.!1 ort�e4 GPI�WO ...._ rt �M LEGEND - EGRESS PLAN °"°` m�m�o�� ....,.e.a — DIRECTpNOFEIilESSIiUVEl �rwM.s. �I VJ VEIiIIC�LEJOf I� HOFIZONfK F)Ot f 1 �� awnw I� pESrnPfIaNOFRaaM i� — N�1IEOFH0011 �O°'��^~�'� s nasyrwr.a.sm.na.� OCCUPANfLd10FILTpt +a�.e�aawoedww --MIpBQ10FOCClFNlIS �O"m°1�"�°P�"�re�+svure s.y n�s�n weMaMtin�wem�us� �ES�ifICf10FEGRE55C0AP1HBR Mar.�a�ra�+v r �Nw�v.v..u�a�r.w�n IOPIDOpt -Ef#SSGOWdIHIt s..nn.�a�•e�.m.n ��aoccxois-asr , nea�oorwoni ••••"•"••""°'°•`"�• 8.9<i!'CIEFRNWIH , COl6NM1N1IlOFEAfWOIH •�p° 'N011AR1FDOOOR ---- WdiMiNG - �ESCRp110N OF Wf STIR CO�P�HFIff �STARNIQIH(Nl._ .s ..—,1CTYYST�IRWDIH ISrMGPACf1Y —MABEROiOCCUPMrtSHLONHI '�ICIIkLlISE —,1CiWLME1B9i0FOCQRNRS I" $CALE: 1'=2P-0' �THIRD FLOOR EGRESS PLAN 7 2(Y 40' BU �� SGUF:P=1od s� wrnne,rs� nnao �ooa EGRESS PLW — A2.13 - r � € �� ie �� t� L �� i � � � T Y EXITING CODE SUMMARY �� LEGEND - EGRESS PLAN �-••- orc�cinxorcc�ss.w�va ro.��..no,�,,,ww.w�.��FO..,�a � veanrxoor " ' � xaevnrrt,uoor a� .mm...,��»,�A�,�.�,� � r�000r - oFSCwvian aF aaau �..,�m.�a ..o,�.ww�. �.�.�., ��I w�armw OCCUPNRLONDFR4Tpt NUIBHi0FOR11PPl/f$ .+ �w OESGRIPIpNOFEfiESSCdIVIB1f rraw��mw�`mm�rcwmaa.�inc OQfW01i-.._— —EIiiFS4C01P01EM MOGC.X0.15=85f —MEWf�WfWO1N &m.azaF.wwon� --Wrftwuna/aFmrworx nann�rtn000n —000na�m+c • h�m*^°TM. o�scrovrioNOFOarsr��ncor.soxo+r �,.�.��..�.,�..�� sr�v�vn� k�: �uw uasr � s�naarnciiv: wuua�aaoaurunsuLwrt-n ncruause: —nciuuru.ee�aaccwKrts �.. �� 4 .,.,...� ��,� C_ 4 �- o: �� ---- . - � --------- s�� ---------- -------------- -- - ------------- -- --------- - -- �� ------------ ---------------- ------- --------- ----- ---------- �� i -------- _ ----- ° --------------------------- ----------- ----- "`� ---- ----------- 3"r $�s '_" ' " ' e5 a . _'_"' _' _""'_"' W """"'_" ""__"_'_ _'"" � U _""""_ _' _ _ _"_'_""_ __'____________'____"_'____"__ Q O r -, _'_____'____________'_"______"_'___ � �" _- ______'_"__ • "' ; j= '_""' � �W'! � W i ,. - - LIONS RIDGE LOOP (PUBLIC R.O.W.) """"'_'__"- C7 - -��---------'-------- � -- ��o -�' -------------------------------------------- _ � , i � -- ; -- �; � m � o � �i' �� g=om �.� � o� � � ,� , � z� ,%.� - -- --- ---.__. .._-: �--_._- . ---- ___..... ___ J o � i .-.s t - �� ,�- i , , � , �. »� _ _ — � � ] � „ W ., u �� - ..0 � K W u N �� ` � c '_ . '. '.._. _____ _.... --- --- � - .v � - - - � � �� u_ � ..s � .� . ,.� � ,.a ..., �..,� na � ..a �.a. ..a �� -� - � , i � � � � � � , . .. �.� ��__ `, a a,�..a.. � � ...w..u.. a � , , � _ , � �.�Q a, � _ . � , .. � . r_ . ... .. . ..._ , , .. . . - � - �. ; , . „ I_ _ , `� % � L � � � �— _� � �� b `�,4 ' ' ,_ , , , � ----------p �`��°" — �� \_(�_._ �l�..v..��7_ "____' """ nvem�___'_ J � �-- - — ' I� `�6�I--�_� _ � d4 __ _ a � i c C 3? � .�.- �..""" _' � � 0 � u�� i . � " `� ° ��.�,'",'� � Scxe: r=zo'-0' �1 FOURTH FLOOR EGRESS PLAN n m ea ev Ij� � scue r=zva � � � � Z � � � � � ¢ � � � � � � °� W �e �s N�.�• � � w=°� �� _� �o ��, � ¢ �� _ � � �� A2.14 —1 � J � r § � �� k� la �� L �� r �� I � �� IL � : ° ' �' i?� � � =s �� ii J �� I�II Ili� I I I�I {�i i � `��% (I�I I I I �� I(I €III�I�II ��I� � r�Ni, r,:;�c II��I� �u��. r. ``�ii�l �� ,�i��9. �� `� � �,. EXITING CODE SUMMARY LEGEND - EGRESS PLAN ""` �o°`°�" ..,.,... �--- oe�ccnoaoF�a.nava •"•,•° row�.�,�,.n.,..��..,�� vexnrxour ' � xonvnxrKOar a� �»..Ew.a.,..s,a. .a..�,� L_ I �� ..�.... _ ��ti o�armioFaoau ••°,,,°"�'ss"�"m..��°�eo.°i �...,mw,��,� �� ,�..o.o..,,� � ..��:...�+ �. �«� . wn.�aFaoou :��+.....wti�.m. oca,vwrtiaovr,crors .,�...�....vw.+ rxxmeaFOawuna i �e-.°R"�^-+..� �.h....r�.�..�� ,,,,�,�., o�aavmxaECaESSCCwaae+r �+••••�,�••sM1°•• .wT+.......... ..��....�.�,�..,�,,,�� oo"roow —�sscwsaErrt � ...�..,�..�,.� socc.xo.+s=eea —r�ar�ooarwom �... e.ea«aEwwioni -mrsi%urwxaovrwmn� r.. now+uh0000n —000aamNc � o�scwmoxaoarsr,wcowor�rrr �,w..a»��µ�.....�sm�,�.� �� —H�o��oauv�vu� � I . rl � F.,._ i-`L� ._3.� r= Q. ! �p T� " ��. Er ' I� ... -� R � _ I _ _ m � � .. _� -.. �: . �_� m m � � � � m m � �•• IIl•• !I � ' � • !I• !IIl•• !IIl•�� @�II�r ��■ IIl�•• !IIl•! . �1111� . ��T.-: �I � 1� . �IA1� , A1 �� . .ry'llll�. .,:,= 11�` !�AI►.F. 'TII � � '. � , i��:"lli��. • ,... ` + ^� i�nr,';: '��i �� ;y�*i�� i �w� Il��i i ivir . � �, ... �� ... f �i'� II _ _'_��, J "n � y�� :��` �� I''� � � � �� .� : , l i i i_, i � ��d E o�_. � �J�''��r�� !I 1 t 'u i� � �� f � _ � �� 4 �. 1� € � �� : w 0N O � J 1�1.. � N W fW7 w (7 � � O 0 Wo�� m�g� � =o m � � U � '"' Z Q � i J °m> -� Q � > � ��. ,�«�, e � ., 0 , a �� 0 � -- - � , . � � , , C �� Ia GS�, S� .. _ i '___ �'MP91 I i ; � . I'—� , I � I ! � h „ } � � , , I . � , � � J� ', j ; � �� I I i I i ' ` � n,m, � Y - � ---- -- , � ' , , , _. .- � --- �-i------- - ---- -,-----�---�--- ----- - -- ----;--J �., � = a...o..a __ ___ _ ` __ p°�Y b�� i � . � � ��- - i - � - . .. b�YWw'�Iw _.. . . � . r � � � � � i i i � __ A , ____ � � � � „_ - , � �`___ ._.�. __i___�� ___ ,. ..., .___^� _. �. .{._ -,,,� i,,,A 9� �� . L____�.t,''� _...__ ___ ._.L____J . .�, ^ „ . .� �1 _� � � y � � ?a�? 3� Q g a � �s �g� scuE: r=ma ,a U � � _ ' tl � � � � � FIFTH FLOOR EGRESS PLAN � � � �•t � � � � scue�r=ma W 2 ffi � � _ � o o � m � � ¢ �e �� o� 2 � snr�rcar�s FlFTHFLOOR EGRES$ RAN sxFar— A2.15 � � � � osoza J � �, P� ia �� a� �� '_ �� i >- dO�M GPIfELL1� ., SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ,,.., �, � asad,o � mamiaEwnoxn� � vurmv�rw�i�c �.r...�.�. i � wu�.+n�.w — — _ woman� .m..r _�---� � �wrraa� � '_'f raoe.m�.�svm � ��'��•— s°�a�wu�.a � � �w�... � aq ax t� ti � i � �i ;; � � � � SGV.E: 1' = 2(1'-0' o �, � � ��REFERENCE PLAN - GROUND FLOOR PLAN Ij� � �:,•=�o- : � '� i? �; �= �� 5� �� +t'y S� -� U J W (7 � K � w m � � ¢ > �7S�a �� :uea .o.sQ � � � � �� E �� 0 � � �3 k� �9 �� : �� i I T ' W.1P _ r � � � , � I � I � i i i i � � i._. _.. _.. pqr4 GFIlELL10 . SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS •-- "°�°'�'" awa7o �. �w�etw,o�.K � wn��...,.� ......w. � w�.�sc,�a,k — ---- xwone�.F .m.d. �-----•� mK�.,o,.b — — — ��nw�w..� '------- — ... � ��.�.,m ., a�w.,-.�.�. �'�.�':.'��'�:.:'�,X s°�a�Y.�.�a � .� � �«h»�� 'nv` '""'sm� .'�".�:r�.�°°... ��:. a �1 :� ## 1 � ...�_ � r@ � �� 1. f � r � vM,, o , ,s a , : I � :� �� ic �� !� � �� t'y S� _: U J J W C:� 0 � � W m � F J Q � � c I art b divYm weC m9a xb � ° �� tt � Fo � � � � � � � � UND � oA - � � � �€ s� 3s b� �i= L �� r � i� �� L t � �wm � � �... �� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ^-^°� N0B1N� mmno �r...��ws � mamaEV�rolrs � w�v�wru.ec r�+r.. � wursm�nc _"—" iwmanm� u'.' �___'__' — —'— ��.�w.ea �'""'_ ra'��wm � .. �.w.r..n....� a�arw�u.a ' ec �+r• V"�`• —� �Ew�� m.�a �rowe� . rawo .rw.`e..��n.� �. � 11_ � �: ��,� �� PARTIAL GROUND FLOOR PLAN- "B" o e ,e � � �:,�_,•� a � i� � � � � � � � i- �; �° i� �� Ik i� U � J W C.'� 0 � � W m � H Q � � C` ertb Diulm a WBO ]Iwela � � 3g �ge � �� m 7� o� � � uNo .= OB � � i � � �� 3e �� a� �� r �� li � � I� T sa ?Y i� i t t vMio t o�4Wts GHN'ELLb � SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS -- � ��' mamia r.w:.iw. � rs�avetwm�n� � nwmowum ..r�er� � wu�n.AC �wmmre� wm..m —�_"'__"' s+urw — — — ��er�wwe� � _____ ru�x�.uvm n��.a�w.�n.�.. o �..�� '� 'w�..e' ` '°`°°rd�:...m::� � �: ve=ra """' � P1 ARTIAL GROUND FLOOR PLAN- "C' a [ 16 3 1 SCµEfIC•1'd 1 1 1 _ J I � � � i' S` ;' �" €$ a� �� €� By �� U J J W C.7 0 � � W m � H J � tmtr dmim EeiseE powla � � � � � ��y�x � g 3 � � a� � � UtA � oc � I � i � � �� j3 E� �L �� F �� } � h k Z F I� IL . T t t _ t 4Y+4. GWLELLIO � SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ;,,,, �„�,�,. �o °' d,�.,�.. � ��.,�,.� � ��,� .a.,... � ,.��„� � � �,� .m..,. � �,,.�.,� _---- ��«�� "� � — - ..,� �« s+ M �MM� Mn� sBlvaY�ulla - BC iaql`I��a o �re.�.�. '""` 'w'°�' ,'�'.�.�+a�.:..ti : : � �� 's 1° € { e�� _� ��:�� -n�� w �� J � Q � —J N 2' N � LL � m C7 ��oo _° � m �o � �=om _ � U � � Z G I--� J m> � Q ^ > � �' � � � � � �2�� I ��..�,�tr �� m�� s �. � � � �� - � F �� '��ZP� REFERENCE PLAN - FIRST FLOOR PLAN � F � � � � a zo� aa m �� s�"E''='°a w="� �� _�� a ¢ �� _ �� FRST FLOOR PLAN aacr- A4.11 � � � o�J i � � �� e� e� �8 �� a� �: �� r � � IF I� F � � �' � � 11Mfp � � �...,, �� u�nM SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS �^— �+a��+' osva�n rw.c�ws � memazwnw.n � wm�o�wum .w..w.� � wua�n�.K _' _"_ wrenmR rr..� —�______ — — — �xira�nma '_____� _" — � im��wn s�wuvaa ' � n�w�.n�o..�.. _._ _._ __.._. ._. ._ m�r ='m scKe +�r. ra pqRTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN- "A" o e is a�� scr��rt�=ro� � � � I � I � I � 1 � � � � : 1" €$ n� �� U J J W C� � � � w m � � a > � =R , �a � K� .o,.o � �� E �� z � e• IA �J � � � � �� 3s �� a� �3 L 43 � � � I� �� i� L r t 11M]0 Y t o...., c�w.o'� �M SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS �+�'' �a � ��,,,�,.a �_ .,�,a.�..w .w....... � .,.,�.,� ------- �� .� �------ ,.�.� ,.�.,�, � --- �"� „� ,.� o �hwa� �w` "w�' � �:ua=ra �PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN- "B' o a is a � sa�:i,a=ra � � � � � � � � i� � li �� C� S� �� £ �a fa U J J W C:� � d' d' W m � 1--� Q � � inb a.ea� m� �s � �� g3 �°� $�� = 16 �J � � k�6 3g �� e: L �� r � � �� L � t �� Y t � ,,,,.. crtnc��o � Y �M SYMBOL LEGEND - BLD� PLANS °°^• ROBN�Y awc�o r..M..,.e.. � are�e�„a+..c � .,w�,�w..,b .....•... �_ wu�r,�c _ — — .emen.wE .m�,.. �------ ----- ,�«�w.� �---- ��.mwm � � n�....�. � .',�.w `�°'.8'M.� �^ � »�w. "�... �� rew�a�a. "u" ,�°n� °°"� �""°�.""`�b. . ..�w , "=..o..a��. 11Mti � C� A1 E 4 �y �� n�� 9��e w � J � O � J � � � W CW7 m U' � ro O w o� � m �o � �=om � U � H z� H � J S� Q Q � > � . i.,. . `�� . ��, � c � nwr mwro.e b � a��mwa�.um dV�eMnalbEeweL brtpYby Wwala mnehxlon N � � Z � � � � � �J�� s oe U �� fi w=�� aQ$e�A _ �m �� Pr1RTLLL FIRST FLOOR RAN'C � A4.11 C o ��L� � T,� PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN- "C" �� a � o� J �J � i � � �� k� je �� t� �L W� r F � I� II � r I� i� � � � _ �� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS �,;.,, �,� � e�,.,m. � ��.�.� O_ �.�.b .a..,�.. � .�.�r,� � .�.� >� —b �,..�.w _ _ �"�� ""� � o �»�,�. "w" '�°"� °` ;.,:.,�,:..,.� ;:s � C� 4 �; 1� €� � n�� _ �€:�� n�� e� �� (� o U � o,_ -' � � � ui � � C� ��oo z � m�� =om _ � U � F Z Q � J °m> � Q � > � ... :,:'��''. � � � � F � _ �� C _ TlMSdanV n b P��Y mad�tlm pf/Nq1MbEe�mM ��bYNP�V mnWllirn. � � K Z } ( � � � F- a F Rt � g �F�ffi�g� SCALE: 1'=2(I'{I' � LLJ � � � � REFERENCE PLAN - SECOND FLOOR PLAN W=�� o m a ar Ij� 1 scuel'=ma �" — m i 2�°� aa�m � _ �� _ �� REFERENCFJPDDRE55 SECONO iL00R PLAN - A4.12 � � � �� I � � z� �� s �� a� �: �� r I� F � � � � �' T t 1IM.1B t t o...., r,�rc�wo � oa�p SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ••— �" ��'' rcwc7o �:�.�� a�w��w,,�,� ^. .�,aw�.,� .....aw.� \'� �_ w..�,o�,.� M��.E .4..r —�-""-- .gem,.w — — — �.r.Ew.� ------- w.. � �� .�� - .� „� u�.. .�.. 0 �re.,�� '""8 '"�"� :w°.�w+,.:..�:':ar � � � � i�•ra �PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN- "A" o a ia a � ��,r=ra � � � I � � � � � � � ■ : i a 7i 1� €� � �� .: U J J W � � � � W m � H 9 -1' �`5 �Rw� � a� wo�+Q n �� x�o .� � �J � � � k� 18 �� a� j3 E� L �� r � � I� I� �� .— T o...,. �� —� - �M SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS •-- "�"a� maayo .�.�.... .� ��.m,nc � .,w��o�..w.,� .�.... �_ r.�.�,o�rw ------- Monen� .°.°' �----- �.r� — --- ,.�w.� �'--- ru��+:m wu o moner�m� '� '"� � �s �.��:a . rdxo � wr.� s' r'�e vMa� a■ _ u Yt i s� s� � . r ""_ _-_-__ "- a a �a az �J sa�:vc=ra � � � � � � � � � � � �� " ra Sg �� p[ 5• U J J W U 0 � � W m � F-- Q J � i � iscb a�.em o. ura �m.au Y� �� - • � � �� m �� z � OND � 26 �� i � � �� w.� ge 4a �� a� *3 �s �� r � � � � � � m � � � M I3 � YMA 1 _ � �... �� -� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS �a^� 10BM' �1D1B1' �o :.�.,... � ��.,� a_ �,�,.b .�.,... � �.�.� ------- .�� e� �------ .�,.b — _ _ ,�� ---- ��,m �` .a... �— �. �,� � � � = �d �,��.� � �µ,, � �"'F"�"''d �LARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN- "C" � SGALE V6=id' o a +e �r � � � � � � '� � I � � � ;: i; �" C§ e9 !� 3e �� _: U J J W C:� 0 � � W m � H � �Yebr diubn �1� P�V y x Sy � J $ a� �a �� o� � � oNo .� 2C � � i � � �4 6� i� �� tg � �� r �F i� � � r' � � � � � � � � o...,< �� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ,,,� �.,�,. �a ':.�.,W. � a,�,�,.�„� a_ �.�„� .A..,.� �_ .,�.�.a .�„ m,� .� � �...�.ro =_-_- �� ,.�.� » �.� o m.�nen�nv 'w.n nw°ae� .�.'°`°°,.a�.r+n:..�.+�r^s + I � � � � scuF: r=m�a REFERENCE PLAN - THIRD FLOOR PLAN o zo� a en Ij� �1 �_,•=pp � � �t 3 I � iE �� e� �� a; �� U J J W (:� 0 � � W m � H J Q � '� '�� Yeb aneYVi MwN amM v x i� �g � �p� �� ss � 3 �� i � � �� 3s �� 3 �� r Ir �� F � F � ?' t t llM.tY t t u4�4 GfWFllb � �M SYMBOLLEGEND-BLDG PLANS � �e� �+o ':.a.�...: � ��,�w,�.a � awmo��w.,� ....swd �__ .��.,a..w — — -- :w��.e .o..... —�------ — — — �M�w.� � ----' �� „� w.. s+ M�Nw�✓w�� m�'fElEn[aflw TM� �� FP�s�MY+niMw.4fvt . solMO �bl��s � � � scvs:ve-ra � PARTIAL THIRD FLOOR PLAN- "A" o e is az sc�et�a�ra � � i� � I � I -+ I � � : �; 1" €� � �� : U J J W U � � � w m � � ¢ > � C �' �tr � .,� ,o..o x �� 3 �� A� � �� 3A � J � e � k� $� �� a� �3 L �� r IT �� Ii I� � � �� i= � 3� � ,�� a �� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS •� �� mawo ...�n,r.� � aiemnaewnwr�c � a�awum .,...�.... �_ ruee�oin� mreiws�a •o"� �"""'" _ _'— .wer�s.� � ____� wi��iwm — wu aw h��rrn.� TBInW.wLn � B[ wW+�Vl�w� O caue�[r�av � �� rmnsw.o�+iv. wwua . rdxo �e�w�n+�w�wa++*n � � rn1l11/LL I f71RU rLVVR rU11W D Q e 16 3T � scue: us= ra � � C� 4 �: �� { n�� =� �s.�� _ W �� p � J �� w c9 m C7 � r o � 2 � m LL � � c W s O m G � V � � Z � � f J $» Q � > � .� � L]�L1�iiL� ��"' ' T 11weMnryRi.f Oiebiiiay onOreEm w�/atl nol bb �oeE brtp4pyrypwgv m�. N � x � W�� Y z p� 3 � J g a��Q ��g� � W �� -' � u' � �' �°� wx � �� ¢ �^ �� ' � i � °� anrsrva �+iao FLOIXt RAN'8' - A4.13B � �J i � � �� 3g �� a� �3 �L �� r � F � I� I� � T t t x �F �� m rm. � � 44�M �E� � SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ^-��^� R0B1"1B°'�' m,m7a d�vwa � oimmnem�a.n � wxmawum r..+�u.. � .wia�n.m �� woaream� °G°' —�____ � _ � ��w�e.me� � "__ �� a�m — wu r. n��w+...e.. r monewmev 1RM° 'w'°�°°� � �.�+n:.w`�...�e:� . rewwo __ ":: `v.��..•w:. � � „� � 5G"`f' „`=Yd n pqRTIAL THIRD fL00R PLAN- "C" 0 S 16 3T � Sf11E12'=Pd � � � I � I I? � i I � :% :E 7- €� � �� U J J W c:i 0 � � w m � � a > .��, � �� s � �� g �� ;�� m � 3C -J I 1 � €€ 3 e� l� �� i �� ' � �F � t t T � t ure4 GFPCEIVO � SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ,°:,:,,� Aoewea�emv aanv�a �.M..�.... � a��.,o�.n ^ �.w.,w .A.....- \'� � w..��a,..� .,.��m ��o... .�.... � oE*u�.,� ----- ��«�� .ro.,m ? �. ... � �. �' � � `sE,�.,w,.� � � ...... o mvErzx.�srar '""a 1R4°f°"" .e.er�me+i.+...s mwsww�.n....,w.� L � � � � scn�: r=mo� � REFERENCE PLAN - FOURTH FLOOR PLAN y,•�, o m a ea Ijj 1 sc„�,•.ma � � il �= (: �" 5� �� 5� U J J W � � � � W m � F Q � �' ' � �—� �m� � a� �� g �� eooaESs xt niw 14 �� k� 3xg a� S3 i• L "�� II I� I� �� I} �� ' T t 11M.iB t tia+M GFICE Wp � t �M SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS � ��+��' �,a °`.�,....� � ��.,�.K �_ .,�„�,.b e...,... � �„�,..� �.�� .� �------ — — — ,.�� ----' ��.,.,m �..�� .� ,."�.�,-� .� �.,�,� TMw` '�'e' :°,",�°.,..» :� � � .9.'4E L!'•1'L' �PARTIAL FOURTH FLOOR PLAN-'A" o e is a �' s�ire•=ra � � � � � 4 � = � e � � ;�� -� ��: w C� v � O r� J �/ w � W c� m C) � Fo � wo�� m�o� �� J o» Q � > � .� � � � 2 � ,�..�.�„��, �� .��ma� ��v �. � � �w �� Z a 3 aF��e � w �e � i � �' �_ �V s��g� � _ � &= y� � a ym 3 _ � � s� cax�rs PMML FWRTH ROOR PIPN'A' - A4.14A � �J � � �I ig �� 3g �� e� �5 L �� r � � � � � � IL L � ss �I� � IM21 _ r � a..�: a�wn � SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS �-^a� � �o ....�.,.e.a � ��.,a.,� �_ .,�»�,� .......� � .�� E„� .m... �---� �,..,�„� _ _ _ ,.�� --- �"� � -�. �,�:d''"`. g :w.."^�....,.. o w�,�.�s�v ,�w` nw.°°� °.�.w'.��..,d.' �."'°°.. � � "�-'� � PARTIAL FOURTH FLOOR PLAN- "B" � sau.e �-ra a � ,s � � � � � � � � I � �5 �� f� fff E� �k£ �a S? U J J W � 0 2' K W m � H Q 7 ��] aab EnaEOn Ue Veed PaMa II � � � 4`�5 �v �. � � � � � � � � � RTH � 46 �� @ � �� R� 3g �� 3 L �� IT �� L m t � T Y 2I _� 3 = T 'i4rM ��"`�i�i1 � SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS ��--• �!+�� ,o :...,..� � �,�.,�,.� �_ �..,.� .�.,..� � �..�.� � � �� .d.... �_ — - _ �.,�,a (----� �..,�..� ,.�� — �� Mwe�+�avww BIB�wILUlla - � uW+Vw��r f M1MElEM�61ar �a� � �T4+�+� wr 1 1 v� � �"`E "'"� � 1 PARTIAL FOURTH FLOOR PLAN- "C" Z_ � o e is az scut:ire•=rQ � � � � � L 1 � C' ■ _ 7� �� €� � �� U J J W C� � � � W m � F— J Q � rsb t�m s ue0 mia y � 5 � �g F�� TM � FC �J � i � $� �� 38 �� L �� ' � 1� L T Y t � Y �., �� SYMBOLLEGEND-BLDG PLANS � �� aoexeainmr oamio ....a+.,.... � u�.e.ww,o..k � ww��o��,w d...a�.... � w.�r�.b � � m�aua.� .� � �,..�nn _ �� ,a.wwm .»a�..�..,.....� �� s`,a....w.a � x cao.,E.m� '""` '""°°w`. ""..�^°.�.r"'��.�.` �""..,,° . ..�w � �o.�. �«�tl . -.a�e........�ati�a. s.,...o...�e o.e.. M.. � °°'�:.+�:...�em,." �.° �� SfNE: 1'=T0'-0' �LEFERENCE PLAN - FIFTH FLOOR PLAN P m ea ev Ij� � so+F:r,ma� � � 1� � i' I �: �� r�, i� �� ?e S� U J J W U 0 � � W m � F Q J �; Z,` � �seb WiaYm �� pwYv 3 � � � � � � � � � � �� a� � � woaFSs � 15 � � r� � � H � �4"� 9S 3g �� s � �� I� a/ �� L Y � 11M.19 � � d.... �� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS � a^— ��'�' rm.Vir.� � meaweav�mxrw � nwmoiwunc r.rM... � ria�nxT w 11N�w� ro..r "___"_ � � rmo��u� w�im aw nw.i..r.rr... �:.�� s°mwuuxa -� ec �- � mu�Ex�smr 'wa 'nYraw'e� .sr�.w� ��^"° � . reu�um _ �"�°"""°'�.r • � suie ns=ra o � te �.�1 PARTIAL FIFTH FLOOR PLAN- "A" � ,�=,•a � � ! I � � � � f � �% i'e C�S �� 'g �� U J J W � 0 � � W m � 1--- Q � �� ob NioOOn M mE F� a � � � E�� = '�'fi E �� : �� Y� � � M I'A' 5A �J � t' f � � � I y� $� �6 �� a5 �3 L �� r IF �F � � � � �� L T � � � �� o�y SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS •^—• ��+' � ��,,.�„� �_ �,�.rw .._...� � .�,�.a � . �� .�.... �--� �,�.��.� _ _ _ ,.�.,� .0 �� "� � . �..� �..��.a � w�;�� .�..,.. o �»�,� ,� ,�..� ,�m �so � oy i ili I i � � wu m � SCAIf 1r8 = 1'P � PARTIAL FIFTH FLOOR PLAN- "B" ��_ � o : ,e u � � � I � � � � i I � �_ 1= 1� €� � � �� n �� U J J W � O � � W m � H Q � � ameh �.um ea wtl �� ! �8 �� , �� o� � � s H � 56 � J � �� r � � rE �� as ¢8 �� s L �� r � � 12 � LMA /_ . 33 � � —r—_..___--.---_.____.—_-- � �,,. �� SYMBOL LEGEND - BLDG PLANS �.;,., �„��, �,o ,� ��,�„� a_ .�'.. , ��.a � ��.� � ,.�,� .� � �� --�------- --- �-----= �K�..� � ,M�� , �� ;��....�.. � �aaM� ��r�, �.� — �..a�. �. ,� . �,� v� ,��.:��, � ,�=,a � � s ,e �� PARTIAL FIFTH FLOOR PLAN- •C• 1 � SG4E:1A'=1'd 1 � i � � � : � � z � a � I _1 � � � � � � 1 ° °�� 9� ��n �� e w � Q J � � � J I..L V, � � � ro � Wo�� mLLoW �o�� F=ZQ� J om> .� > � > � T, � ,�...��..b �� wIl aq ml b be uetl �'�' aVpaal R �. � � xb J � � � S ' a � � � � �� > � �� q� ��i : < �� EFrWII�grtS M7NL FlFlH '_OORPfIJI'C FEr- A4.15C 09024 �� ot � � �g �� i8� �� Ir '� � � Y � # � ; �°. ��°- - - W�° �; :,°,"_o �� -�` �1� I __ - I ��o.�o�.rs`�o.� .A.mair..�n� I �RTTT� � I` i ' I' F I � I I I r I r � 11" iY..a �.;91tl��+a��uxli� ��.!tIIP 0 �,�;I!�f, � �� 1 �— � t t � � b (iFhCElLHI � SYMBOL LEGEND - ROOF PLANS � %� ��+8� mm�o e...,,..d � �` � aoEO� .v... z�acwc � - - - _ � � �-�,.. ------� ------ .��.�.� ° --------- � i� a.s.*m.� � i i —. �� .��...... e ,�..�e-....ti..+.. �..._..._.,,_,,,_,,,_ ..��w<�.w� : �. =�.`� w: a'. ."°�a'�,..�..: °.:a �� .. -{ °�.°...°w"'o.� °� : a..a=a� m.°>' u.. Mai+��a..`a. NOTES _.,,�,,.., Y � � 4 � �� _ �� C' �: 4 �� n� � n�� n �� n��z ��s� �°��. s�m�, W (7 U J Q � � J � w � m (7 � F O 0 Wo�� m�o� g=om U � J ? � � Q � � � � � .. ��-�-�� i.. . � .. � .e- ,�I � �I �a 1J�II It �,� rI� _' _ � I ' �_ N � � ��II� . IIII N "..'`'_J F i� .. � ��i..�� _.. .,�-.��L I. _. i'� , / �i' �. I JI � * Ll — � • � ', _' 1 � I � � II �' � a' I - 1 II I, I - -I . I -� � .�. ��,� -' � 1 - _ --- �� I� f� I D�m�'m[Ni¢Pln _ � II � � � ��b� I� II II— - � I i�l I� I �� mmbi�on. _ - 'I �I �- - 1� � � . . i I . � � ...,— J_. :� � .. __ . ._ .._� w u �.. . _.. . I `. _- _ _..... I _ - ' ;�--- — l _�� ,�v�.�� _! �o..�� _ �.e.�� --- �„ m � _�.�.�� mo.�.�� a��e�� .� � � -�� , REFERENCE - ROOF PLAN y � � �$ � � P 21Y IV BV �� 1 SNE:1'=1➢'d �= y$ '� z� � � a � � � � � � � � � � _ S�EFrcaNlBns REFERENCE RODFPLPN S�EEr— A4.16 � � � o- � 1 I � �� a� a� �3 L �� r A ' � L T t ,�.,o t t �y.�4 GROCEl1N/ � SYMBOL LEGEND - ROOF PLANS - �>-- �"��' mmho rrwur.s � � � �:�uw rr.�... wNOOC [---7 � �—oEna�wnn � '_____ �aurxwm 9° � `,� l s,a�rmi� , �i a�v�+nas.r t �i — aarto�s+n r.ww+r.....�. r �a�..a.n.r..�.da u..a... �. sm..,�e.rwr �,,,�,,.�...�,,,��,�� wr+Ea...m.�w. �.e�.�.e..�we.�eo.+.�. .. t� �� _� _� � �,a � � � �� j � ; ;I . =- i �- - ! il�x 4L� ��', I' �' ,jl -� if °� ,� �� 'I �_�_---- ',' � " ', _'�I . � � � , =b , � � � ��! � � �` I T d �a n _ _ �,; :'� ' �, 8 i _ _ i � ; I --- ---- � �_�aila ___?� � . . ... ._ 1 ,'�r II � II'1 I ° I I. � I I �1 I 1 I xx¢ N � 1�FI`_ . I I J f j I T_"__ -__ � � JI s_� � ( T p '., �� r._�__ . — — l I I T � T________._ � � II � 4' � ..� J ', � � �` �, �.�I4 � O � r �- p �.�,, iy ii �. -j______.._. � `, � I�+� I 1 ''q (M a ?' 06 __ J I I � ..._. �I � •i II .._ ` r- ___�_________' � II � � '� fl �i.i � -. .n. I I 1'i • � ' F ' _ ��_`° ti ; � �' N� _ m,, �„� r�l " R ; ' � � �� ' _ �'� I ; �-- — � �' � � � , � �I, � ii �� ' � — — — — — —' � � el a�� I � _i i %I � — I •�' L��—� I , « �'� ------ --- ' � � � -�I --� � _- � � , � � i I � ! �� I I '� I °''. � I , i , ' ' I � , �� .�,�.. � . ,�...�. �r r *, � I �, i �. .� .b I .m.. ...4 . . ..�.. - _g � � �',, �` — — — y . i — ----- z� u�m q ��; ~ I: - I , , P� ` a ,�_ � � "�"'° � PARTIAL ROOF PLAN- "A" o a ,s 3z `J scxe,�r=,•a � � i� i� �; �� i€ �� J J W C7 0 K � w m � r < > �� wtr rSV .C� M weE p� i� 3g § �g� �� `.3� o� � � i � 6A �J (— I � �� S� �_ L �� i � � �� r L Y S, � �� t r i1M31 T �.. �� SYMBOL LEGEND - ROOF PLANS ^�^—�^— fOBNB°'� muwo rr.�.a�w� � ma.weawnum o r:�eo..mn ..�..w. � � � �axow rr.�.. zraxlu [_---7 0 ��.F..� �_�,,.�w ------ �uu.� '° 1 �'°"±ii�''. ______�___� � � s.s�mw� M�yu,.�,+....� i _. __ saeo�u .".r' w°%r°e.nir�`�..i<+a � �_�_'_�_� i«v�.�.x..n.0 !+'�we'��e'� e �a ti.sa.�.� �... � m...m a suo�.s�e:�weww w;'e...r..+•w�+o��. � m..ls�a.+s n.r.em.a .....va.w+....�m..�.� wa�...�rmr.+v..u.. wro+n�i......a'r v`.a. n NOTES _md..r.o. �� -� � =_ � � � I I 1IM 1p 1 I ( � "�-'d �PARTIAL ROOF PLAN- "B" o e ,e n U �,�_,•� 1 1 � ' � � � � � I � ��i �K5� d� �� U J J W � � d' � W m � F Q � �^� �S eseb NneEOn b uM pwela � � � W � � � � � � � � � , %� y d � � z � � 6B � J � � � �� ig �� a� �3 L �� 1 T IL �� I� L t Y 3 � h_ _ I I �-� _ tT i�}� I �i L� � I�I :_- r .�' -�-- I�., 1 � -�.I� II I III � f' II - �i i'---- - � ii ii- i if I —�i. — J G�� __ (i N � {i'. J L L II1 'j � �.r il:l''. i� . i � ii i� ___ I i i il � _ _ � I/ � I �I i — 1 I jl � I I — - �� 1 --I � i� _ i -_J,� � .� i � � p,�.. � --�--, ' } ia � � � _ -- -- I � t t ,� 1 LMZI � t o-.... cvuc�w�o � SYMBOL LEGEND - ROOF PLANS ^°-°°� 1OB1N� awvio ...�w.,.�.. � a��w.,�..� e �.�oo.wart .......... .� � � aoES�un .m� wnznc �---_7 �.� � �� ------� ,' �, r.a.*nc.�� ...... ./i �.a�.-r... � y :PoO.�.. � ��.,,q :`»°r.� ..."�'� .",.. w..�.°ww. _ _ _ _ _ — �«��w.�.�.. �°o�,.e�>...�,. w�..�......�..m,.�m wd......�e>.o.dw r+r�w.rs+a��+ m....r+s w.ra.� e.+°°+v�.:��m: u.a NOTES �r ':'��." �� 7I �I su��. ia•ra � PARTIAL ROOF PLAN- "C" � �_ ,a 0 B 16 3t 1 v�s �o � YA5.10 '� � � ii � {° I: �; �" t� i� 3� �� J J W � � � w � � J � n`or areem e. ueea v� i� 3� �g�� 6C � � � a � �€ H� �8y �A s� �3 L 9� �� ELEVATIONS-MATERIALLEGEND O� w U� �,..,��w., B � ��. n«�.�,Q O� �� ,..,,�. p� Pµ�.�.,,�.�A 0� �..W„�.ma� p.� ,.u„�.�R p�KA ��.�� K� �e p � ,� �n � � ��.�� p��.�� R F 0� p., �.k�.�� p � � .�, �., p �� .�a�n p «,'�� p �, a O� �� O��rt �R p `�� Q � �„� p.��.�a �� I� I� � t t T :i r dbra. GR�CElMO � � ' �tl� SI JL AW aoew e�Aer 2 �SOUTH ELEVATION SGLLE:IR'•t'R L � � � + o e ,s � ��OUTH ELEVATION SCKE�. L9"=1'-0' C� � �- �� _� �� -�� :� � ��s�> W � p � J �� N W � m CJ � �O O Z G � m � � � �=�m —�� o� i J �> J Q � > � � � �� m..a�..+�w..r� paimnrymaaiwm ! myeMrotbMUea E m.�v+arwwor� mowwea� � � e w �� s ¢ i �� c~.��'� ~ �� W �� _�� ¢�� y �� _ � �� EXiERIOR ELEVATIONS SWTH ELEVATICIN s�� A4.18 � �J � a � �g e' � °5 �� L �� I� aBB�. �88� ----- I[ac�n. IF i� �� i' L I 1 ELEVATIONS-MATERIALLEGEND O� p � ,� ,.�� R� � � �� Q o� e �,.�.�w„� �,� � ��.�.,��.�,a � ��..,,�.,�„� �a g..��,..,.,,t,. �� e� �R p�� « Q ��K��,� �a e �,�. � � �� o �',�� a � nnsaemaiwwElwr.mma o ��,w�.�n o� � o � �.µ �a.� e��.�� .�� a o ��..., �,a., � wu�r nwmw� caac 0 cuv.urrum�xwn man � �oni..wv wwn 0 r�carnra� monu 1 Y t t � I � o o - o .. ,Q o P - . �, � !ee, i��a .� � � B � � ee � _� 1�I � — _ •v =�.:+ .� �- � - - - � -�� "_� - ,:� a` � �� -�� i ., ; _ r -- -- -- --- — a �� aE`� �! �iF � �� B�� 8� 88 88� aEE � - - - -_ t ��F �8,_ �� 8�.....3�8� ....,BB� ....,,.,�E � ;88t a8� g� E8' 88t = BPE; ,' :.— '..-�. _ _ ..__ __ ..._ — ____ __s- - � __ _ — _.. � ,, ` __ ��_� _ . _ - •.�z. �-- � - _ ._ _ _ _ ,_ . . , _ — — .� ,.� �.��: _ _ _ ___ 2 NORTH ELEVATION � _�� { ,_ ,� ._ �r ._.� " .t, �._.t;,i'':�y �.i �'�..i..�._� �� I i ii'., �': ' „'1 �i -. - i ' - r ..carov�u�vunEwar 1 __ _ ". __ _ _ _ _'_ ___ _ _ _..... il I i :!_h; • i � .I� i I � Ii '� i � I ' i . � ��.:. i . .. - ---- _ . -- ---- ' -�- � -- - � �.,z..�. J � � � � i � � -� .� ,� . J� , ; � � � �� ,�,.�.�, � � ;; � � � �� ' �� ;��. ti �,�, 1 . � �",� w.�� J� - 6� �. � �,�1 z.,F..�„ � � ,,I , , _rn��u. � I. � . , �� ----- ] �' I , , �.w�. _ � J �� I � ��M�, � , , � �i _ ' C - _ § = . - i - - � - -z --- �,�� ] ❑ � ❑ �� ❑ �,�� _ 21 �,,.�� ,�.� _ , _ � 77 t � i I I _ ��- -« -'�— -*� — I I �r I � �� ❑ --- : - --,�� — -- ss- a � � — _ �-- �❑ _:�❑❑ -- o..�m��.��.�. — — �,µ�� - -- _: �.,,a r _� �, � `= n - n � n : -_- - �,�,�,�� Y PARTIAL ELEVATION � PARTIAL ELEVATION SGLE:IN' =1'-0' SGlE:1N' a 1'fr �: �A•. ra NORTH ELEVATION � o s ,s v scuE:,re�=ra �� SI AW ROBIN BHLEI�Y C� �: �_ �� ;�� n � ;�:�� 'b��Y ;��e� ��d J r J � W m f.) OQ � K � O � U m � �� > J > � ir�iprefa �ry mor6nalon IndbbueC Mryappaelw v4utldi. � �� 3g �� W �� nt etEVnnons ELEVATION � 4.19 �so2� J � � � �� L �� 1 � �� T � �� `w"�"vn . � � � i� �I �I � � � �I ��. ■ E, i O t ��'. �. -- � � --- .. �1 1 � �� I'i 11 �� , �I ��. _ - ■ :::: .. ., .... :: �.. ,_::, � � iil� - �I �ilii �■� — 4� � ATM��r.00-naaar 'µ 4 _ � �$,,. - _ � ,_,.� - ��,.,m,, I� � L � I�� r � _ 1N I �� I�� r� � � I rsixrw.nra�waae � �-- � .. . . . __ _. _.... . .. . � - t �rrmwwn t I °� �me�ie �w.v t �tnic[nWn � i �� . - . o �� •� ■ I o �� • �� N . .. �� ii �_�� o o I � � �� __ I �� • � � � � � �� ■ � � � �� ii � � ii ii � � ii �� Y, :� �� , ___ p . �� 1� w�� iiii iiii ■ ■ � ■ � � � :.I q � � Ip w , . .. , � � � � � � � � � � � .. a �.. .. � .. ..�� , .. ��'-- i�C: � � � � ■■ : �� ■ �� u �� _ � �� . ., .. �� N `•�� n� I � NY' __ � �� h �� q��. �` r� _ _ip � � �p� fNN ! � w� I �I �, �� _,,.,:: .. .._ . s,,, w a�� ,,.5 � � ��. � = = i\ ' up.aq� CAACE WO � � �p SI.AW NO&N BF11EX9Y i �� _ _ „ �.� _ �� E �. . . , :_ _ . _ _ .. _ . - - .. . qmfMrnc+n�raA % . �� a� � �,.�� ,,,. � �I � � � e � NORTH ELEVATION � SGLLE:,R'=,•-0' � � �.,��. �,�� ae �� . . e �'�i'�`�w-L'�'� �' q6�� - : b�g�Y ��5�g� _ ___ _ -- xwmeaneF �^L�Ea msanowa[wrc/ ..._ ' ._ ., ' ....... - .._ ....______ _ -- ____- — oEmumEinusr �' --- . - - : -:_ . -- .-::-_ __ _ � __ _.�:. ELEVATIONS-MATERIAL LEGEND W ��".`m�m - - '�, -- _"" "" . "" - __ " . .. .... __ . .= n�+?,on�ns*�vril - -__ �.._ '�,,' _-_ _ .. ... __ J _ __ . __ _ "' _" — " ' "_"""_ _ _ _. _ _ .. . � - ' 4 . . ... Om[+maamwwiswmmFxm�.mwcn Q _ _ __ ' ._ _ .- O� .. rn�omuon Da.amaww.wrenmxr.axmma — a' - - - � w - - - �' -- -- - B�.'�°`nwem�,�«w�.cav�.� �i c�m' C9 - - - -- ...: � _ ��.�., fl 0 fl = � - - � o � ,�� R w � � - - - ,� o -- _ � � � - -- - --- _ . ,�� . --- - � ��,�,� �n m � - - �.� --- - - - o ��.��...,,,�.�A � = o m � � U ... . . _ .... --- �reEame�rorH[uwru*eas.mwc � p � � 1 _ ._ �. ..__ _- - �r.uoox�e�our - . . ._�. -- esworHr�mortrunawu*�ee woan Z > ixwrwronaixaar - �'� ... _ _ � _... __ i _ _ _ _ - _ J _ - � -..__ - - �exovrHrffnurnw�israunee oiwa , . . _ _ ___ _..... ._ .. .. . _ _ .__... .. . _ _ _ — __ __ __- -_ .' ',. ...._ Qwnmrtrviea�miarwma-mann Q � � -- �� rnwawrt _ _ __ __ __ .. _ .... Q xw�m�.ar�ea� ��wmw-mda > riemalamm ' .. .__ I .. Q r� marmi ma+n � e m xoff : ��,_� � -- , �� ,�,,,�� _ _ — � _ - -' ��.ro„��a _ - __ _ _ 0 �� __ - ��..��4 , , -- : �,K� �� _ _ __ om,��.�, : . _ - —� _ ,� - _ ��„� .�. �� -- - _ __ __ , _ o , �;,.,.� - - -- _ - - . -- - - - _ , _ o�,�...., �� - - - - , - - - - .��, �� - i o.��..� �Q - - - _� C' f -- �f ,. .,�� - ��FF�a - . ,��...� �n ��..�� - �..� , �� _ _ - ��.��.�o � COURTYARD �4-SOUTH ELEVATION = -- - � o ��°° �'�� ,re•=,� ��,� _ „ � � � - � i � - ' a��.,�. 0 � I _ O.�* �' � - - � I� ---- �--- - -_ - mme ai..np�rerw ^I � . _ . - _ peFmirerYmatiMOn ... .� �...L�l ___ ""_.__ _____ __. _ .F.. .. ...i . ____ ____ __. _._ _t_ anNwnabbu.a ��Maopu+iv wmnmrnarew ... _.._ ` � ��rwmwamrEUx� y��. � -- - - .. n - n n _ , _ _ ' ' � 4 ENLARGED PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION nENLARGED PARTIAL NORTH�EE NEVATION �� '�"°°"'°" �� ,«,M.��,�.� � _ _ � -, SG1E1M'et'-0' - ,,: _ _ � � .... . .. .. UN , �, . � �mart a�.crm�aa cn�un�inxr mone sca�uen mc�[ cn��.nwrt mcarz eca�u[a g wa u ,:' �. .� ursaa� �urmxoe�e mic�crt 9} t N p rn�owwrt riacxia�oare _ , ' . � � erv�m�oew ' e . _- __._ . Fur.oneina A _ � " � �y � r x wrtxorf Y W LL d , ~—'�. � — -- _ _ — — _ _ --- ¢ -. _ _ _ _- - _ — — — — ---- - _ „ , -; � r �, i a � � � . ° II �_ � as c� ,- �� 0 �� il - i a � ' � ," :- � �� W - „- �� '`` �w� � � �' � q _ ] ;�',� ��—��', � �-- i J�._��_-`-�- � -��--n �:�-r� ,r� �:�rJ�� ..�� I � � g . _ _ mxrw*oAnsrwA ' � �; ..., : ._ _ .� _:.._� I � . ,,, """ 1,. i _,I � � I —" , r�r � � d' �.: 4 O � � _-_=.. _ . � � i, ° I � F l O ' I__ I � � I I = s Y � _ . . . � V 1 : � � — I �, . � � ; rI . _. _ � . — �' —'�,'�.. I � I� .�M Ir , � � a ° _ __ i ` .. _____.. aineruc�..nnm.. ...__ ._... .._ ... _. . ...... ._. .. ..... .. __ .... . ...�.. .._.�.._ .. _.�...... .. ....... -_-_� � av� ..-_ � � . na.nx 3{ � � � __ -,,.. ... _ _... < � ' ��.�� .r� ... ._ - - � � � � � .. �� .. . . .. ..... ... . - _ cruimmwr t= � � � � � � � � � � . .. _ - . _ . . . . � - � �� .. ._ . _.. �ru�owrua __ _ . __ - _ _. . _ _ '____ __._ ____ . _ I I 2 - _____. __. � z _ - _ _ -- ---- ----- - - _ _ __ _ -- -- - ---- _ . __ _ - - -- --- - _ _ _- - -- -- - - --- - - _... . .-- - _ .... _ _- _. _- __ - - � �,�,�,.,,� - - _ - -- --- - __ _ - -- -- -- -- - - __ --- --- _ _ _ _ -- - - - --- -- -- - - - - , .�,�,-0��m,,' - -- - - - -- - - ��,� - ------�°---_` _ _ _ ----, _ _ -- _ _-- - --- . _-- � w¢n��t , _""____""_.'__"'__.__'_'_- I I E%iERIORELEVAT70N5 _"'_"" _. _ " "" "" __ _ _ _. - NORTM ELEVATION _ . ' '__ -- '� . .... __ _ _._ __' _ — _ —."_ _ &�rxo __ . _ _ _ . .__ _ . __ .. _ _ - _" '-" . _ _ _ . _.... .... . _ __ _ . _ ' ___ ___ _ ' __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . .. ._..._ ._ .. - . _ _ ._.__ _ __.... _ _ '__ .____ _' _' . __ __ . __ _ '_ -_— ' '_ _ .. _ -:'_ - "_"_ . -.- rr. .... _. � — �,� A4.20 . . I _ -- __-- __ __ -- --- ��,� _ - - - ;1 NORTH ELEVATION I ......._..� ..... ......... ......... ...... .._. � .... ..... ..._. _....... ...._. �_... ... .......__.. ...... ...... . .._.....�. ...... .O. ..�. 'S.._.._.. ...�.. . ._I�_ ..._.._ ........... Sf11E11B'.1'd � 0—J � � b� !� �� _ L �� i i� � � � � L T t ELEVATIONS-MATERIALLEGEND �) �a,.�.�s � w. ewo,�.rs. cuw�, t t t � Z COURTYARD #2-SOUTH EL�AT�ION � EAST ELEVATION � o e ,� � � � �:,�.,.� I � y� fAACElMO � � s xaeri aEU�rer i �i � I T � E: �� i€ �� n �� U J J W C) � � � W m � F J Q � � �nbr N�on b�sE qiowl v �N � ] ' �W � C F � � � 'g� � � � y � d � � � 5. EVATN7NS ELEVATION ?1 �� L �COURTYARD #2 EAST ELEVATION �:,�_,� � �. y � �� ` �'�i�in��i 7 i��xu�^i� w�„w��+ .�� x�am�wmn��u�`� _I�]I�,.I� � ,■ �� ■ � �� i�i� . � � . �� m �_� � � � �� ; '��i �� i� o ;�� ..�e� - - � jii�� ■ I �'9�■ ■i. �■ ' '�7��'- ■ !�$��': ��3� �i."�-- �ei�a � �`-�:�,� �aa�_. • -.� • � LLE: 1H'�1'1r s is ar � � w�._„� — J�^a!n".?n<'^wo... .. � � � � •`� .uui � � � // �--r. . . � � � I �� II � � � � ��/" .", .:: .. ��. �� o �I � '�i�� _ `' f�� . . � ■ .. .. . .. in� �� . i. �� I.. 0�. u.. � m;i� :!� i �i' i i i i i�� i`' ':. '� ��IiL I !� ■ _ � - �.�7 � � � I`-�■ �� m �� 0 . ;:....- ., . . � � � � �� ! � - f ■ �1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■' j i� = I �� ■ � a�� - _ — _ -�= =°e�-°e�=.er-°= - �; _ � m �� • •� • •• • �a�caenv,vus ,� rianmausiacew �� --<� -- _ � ��rt �--� � �� --m �� COURTYARD#1 SOUTH ELEVATION J SCAIF'.12'=1'V � vr�mw'�7' ' _ __ _ . _ _ . � WNiWM�ItlMIMMIN�IMMI�IIWN i n�11YI1NIbN r NIyI�III��WI�HYMIIN�N141��b��M4� T I�IIIWW� W ��IHIIC tll�� '� 1�.°'�.a� x.. �.�.�:�� '° � �°"��:d� � • o .'�_ _ . �, � il■��■ i.■ i � �� o� . .. _- �II � - ■ �:_C� : :: : m I�■ '�:�ii i I i � i o ��,� � e� �.� �• �--�� ', �� \� �� ,� �a� �-� .� �� a��.■■,..■.■:.��■ ��.��:..�oo¢o��..z � �� ..��r ��;r�''� a�r� = �i��'�,r�� S.r_e g`°� !�..�g� � � � � ... � _ ��:; �o - �w�.. » �o � �I �'I��.., o��a � �smE��r�.a mwn ��u �erarEmiwxammn �� :µ :::� �R o��Pµ��M� �a e�.�,��,.�.M„� �� .�,��,..�.M„� �a o �.�Fl� ��.,� �, o �,�� a e0 � �n� maxn � couiosno.a«u�a.ior wevR ��m oR��k�� o� � �� o o�� ,�� o ��„� �� o �� e � �,,,..� �m� � � �� a �. o��,K�� o � � �.�n o.�,Y.�.�,a � � � � _____... ... -O � � i -0 -� u4�4 GRACElNO � S�. AW w„.aeirv NOBINBFIIEFBY a �� `s 1° �€� "�� €�� Aa � p � J ��mw �� oo Z � m�� =am � U � � Z Q 1-- J $ > -' a' `> > � � ,b..e,.�w..� P�InYnery mdne4on my W nol b h ueA MiBpu4bryeppo�im mmN �. N q q F a � � d � � � � �8 avi�= ��S asc~.��'� y � �' �� w x s� � � � _ � &� � �aj��g _ � � sxn.ca„�vrs�. EXiERIOR ELEVATIONS Cq1RNAR�S t7 6 tl2 sn�r� A4.22 � � r e � �� 8 a� �3 L �� , 1� 1� � (g ) GUUKTYARD 1i4 EAST ELEVATION �� ,I� � � � nCOURTYARD #4 WEST ELEVATI01 �,�_ sc� ��=ra 0 C 1C y � hMmM*on � _ ..... _ ___ _ � vmo�r.oana.rnr.. . _ ----� - __ _' ^�*_� _ � ._wumx � �.o�.n.,, - �— ; A —� - . � - �'_'.�'_� _ moiwnnvwnpa,� � � ELEVATIONSMATERIAL LEGENI O� p �,�.�.,�,�..�.�a � � p � ,��w�, ar«a O� 0 ��.�»,.,,,�.�., p��„P ,��, �,a p �, . .,� ., p.� ,..� A p �. � ., �� q p � ,�� e�� .E� � p ��.��.�R p �. p..� �,k� �., p ��.F.�,.�.� p� ��,�� p ��.,,� p .� A O� wW �„ � a..,� p �°°=K�,r � R O� � pO ��" �a,,,�.m�o �, t' _ � o-� °�,. i � I u4.aM� GINCE WO � � y 51. AW ROBMJBf11EXBV �.e.,�..�� :--_$ _ :_-�� _ = �*.o-$ _ � ,��.om,�.a�• ��.a�..,�,,. _ _____ "°"`"_� - C � __ � , _ � � �` € � e��g �� N�� sa��: �� °' �M.—� _ w � O J � ¢ � W _.. rm�r_n"a a� - Cw7 m C.7 ` � Fo � z � i� �� m�� : �..-$ _ �� ,� � � � m ��,�;,� � � � � � J z ; � ��.,�n FN t- a � � N �t � � ,,,��•_�—� �� `i� j ' �—�;�,,,�„ � � � - cnan�.� '��. �� F.��.F _—_±� - , f�„�a,�,�.,� I � unMnrurFnua , _ _ _. . - �COURTYARD #4 NORTH ELEVATION . �J �� i�= ra �� = �: � � : :: �� .. �� ! .� � � H ,'�� IN i�� . ►J' � ��., 1� � � � �� iii ° ii iio i� u� �� r �� tn�n.n��u�v.l �� I �� -y �� N \� d �� xn��omsnv� � ¢uwrw urreie�ui��aq � COURTYARD #3 EAST ELEVATION � J � Sf?lE:1IB' • 1'd' �� ln10lEMYf '� � --�'��T _ �YrouxmFw..awnerav. �,�,R � � � �.�:� �� 4.��.��,,,;�°�' . � � 0- -0 �ro ��,�J b � �� —�roomaan � - � vwee .. nrvnm�wn�� "�'°x� o-� � �rEC�ertiw �wi*ome�mrrr �+ iw _ �_-__ � �MiEM.�NN�D'.AY '�. CY .._ .. ..... �tW _.._.. . ��„�„�,�,� .,�.,�� 2 COURTYARD #3 NORTH ELEVATION �:,m•=,•� � N�N�IJi111MI�H� � F/ nnN111 NMyWY NIp� a� IpMIMMN �MpNN 41wN�NN�11�p O�M11 �1 �� NIYIe�� t°e�ww�°iwwnaw��mq uu��n - � ' i � s � s i � �'' , ■ ' i �' ■ I I I .', 1 I e — � 9 : 11 � � �� —■—. � �� — �-� � a.M„�.� a��..�,w. � m�.�a.„�..sa peYnrery mwdretlan �NYtlMbOCUeE � � eVp�V ^:,:� . mW�ution. +-•-' � . � _ �- N � � za�? �� - _--'�- a � �� as c> � � ,� 3 �`�� }Fr• �� ,��,ea,��• w = � � � � E — _ � _�$� �3 � Q � � �l - � � � � -_ vrAU_.omeiaarwA = � m z � � SIIE£�LCYIIBIIS. E%TERIOR ELEVATIONS Cq1RTYMOS q 8 Y9 — �.onn. � °� — A4.23 .TI�ON � � J Y �'i � � � �4 9a 3g �� a� �3 L �� ' � � I� �� I� � L i t Y � t � t � to> ... . . . �c _. .. . ... ...�. _. : x�- an,� __ .__--i�arr.rY — me Y — —� — .DING SECTION ,I `vr+�. GNACE WO � � xoaweaiEnev �= �.? � �. 1� € � e�� €:�� °��Y �� w � p � J �� W Cw9 m C7 � Fp O z � m�� g=om U � 2 ¢ � � J $> � Q � > � � � i mm. a�w;�w.a m peMminry mpbretion �N � �w b ee uee Mnp.leYxyapqo�arc Nnrtutllu�. � � � z a �� J � � Vi �pQ ?�g � °'6 U �L � � � N H �' �� W = �� gE � aQ� � � �� 6 _ � � sMUrmx*e�rs�. BUILDING SECTION BMEEr- A5.01 J a�J I � � �`g f� 4�� a� �A L "�� __ I L.OP � ' — e15faY1' .-.-..-. I k � q rnD �w��. } — Jb— . — I k I I � li 9 I�A m W aoon4?a �• } I..._....... _ ___ .- z IT I} _� S �NWtttM R6N�AE�../��1 �\ _..___ _... _._� s �— Yora L t '� t Y ie_9.a�M.Yi . .... .i � hi,o am¢i[�R_/._ _ .R,nm�,r _._.__.._ �� ra� __ 4 EXT. WALL SECTION � R� � EXT. WALL SECTION �� t Iu0r1Pi�� FU�s�a� �.w�ie��/utvs.�R�l� IIOaEUMtB. � cvxm�e_ais[ arnm�c � — �ins. mM�LQL9lE�a..___'�__........ � n,Y aC�1lNaufXY�.s]VN k UNIT W��M�,� N,. ��"�.«�;°�.�� .-0n ��. .an�m ` _ � .. ` T 4 � .. ..� . ..-,.� YY "a' �.'� ., �rY� � . �^TY . . . . I�IU�1HFx4w.D. ow�enOtzoc Y uruT Nn��Po�ios c�wa�B�a�i�l — I�+:on_.__ro� W _.. un.wm 4 n,.F�.narnc cn rx -�x: �i nnu*r�eunai 9 muvmss.rr�xvm.eo. a�a�row.e.+s+:oo . UNIT u,.,�.��.«�"�.� —4*nn.��wu�--- un.a.n - � s ' n"lJ T I�lurmsrrm¢xmv.ro. w�aw.e,a�zo< UNR � Nn�wxwaw[ ��2�1 �7 1Fi.mulcf.fMf6 — �i.oL �yfy__ inn.M'�l elg�j�� . ' � l.. � .t�.. rrr '_".IX ). .t.-�- �.,.�:m..�. aiu�,�a'�,.�o.c I g UNR 1IM�B.61elE A`s � v.n I .. _ . wcraaw _..... Vmv '. .' . ' , .. . : . . . - . : Z EXT. WALL SECTION �?_ � �ZEXT. WALL SECTION � � � t o.yeM GfiICEIYD � � �M af�a 9�{�dY � i` I' � I: 1� C� i� �� { �d U J W � 0 � � m � F-- J � C" Inb rsmtim �� a �g� ?g � � � i � � � i � N .3� a� � � 6 LLL SECTIONS � lo �J � � k= �� 18 �� s� �� r �� I r �� L � � T � �1 ENLARGED RAILING ELEVATION � � 9G4£W.1'J 5 ENLARGED RAILMG ELEVATION �� a d4�w. CAIGE WO � m.W AW . 94BMBEdd�@Y aw9�m w �.�.�..,�. � �1 ENLARGED RAILING ELEVATION � � sc�:sr=ra � J , I , :° :� ie :� �: �� €$ ig 6� �� f� �� U J J W � � Q_' � W m � H J Q i � �� a� �� o�� E �� i3 �J � � �� e� 3g �� a� �3 L �� I � L t � t � t � �, ��. J3�'� � �,�,�, � ,S��a.: � ..i �.�»�� , . . � � ! O �. e��w.o�.m y' �,�,.�.. (il,' ��- ��•�� nwn xr�xioa �� `-"°-' � � WINDOWHEADATPIBERCEMENTSIDING 6 �r.ra STEP 2 `i.f. � _-� d.� � ��; '� �'� � �,h-�` _ , � .�.�� B s� lr . �� {� ( � °• ST�P 4 � �' STEP 5 ��'~ SEP 3 '��^� �.�� Vr;j ' EXiERIOR INTERIOR 5 WINDOW JAMB AT FIBER CEMENT SIDING wu s. ru % �`� (A) .�_� ��(A) (B) (�) STEP"6: t .., ��,�� XT�.,_ raxmerrtwEXIERIOR INTEPoOR WINDOW FLASHING SE�UENCE RECTANGULAR WINDOWS) WINDOW SILL AT FIBER CEMEM SIDING 'O aVAw�sNEer.wra+WC� .�unwo.We g�.pE�.....�.�. .':I 4 9CHEJ,ra EXiERIOR INTERIOR 3 WINDOW HEAD AT STONE �E.= � EXfERIOR INTERIOR 2 WINDOWJAMB ATSTONE scue�.a-ro •••�•N•••., � w.>�.w�er�rwv.na �rok i�rok ro ro � WINDOWSILLATSTONE 9CMES•1'd aa+a cauce u�o � a�4 AW •eraatiea ROBNBFIIEPBY C� �: � � : 1 " ��Fb� ��°�� ; ��$� � J O n —� � � W t11'a w C:i � O 0 Z � �' � � W s O m U H $> J Q � � � �� arew�..ea wmmenmo�a�um y.ne m�t ee ue.a iqaM ewmw a m�on. a �� J � � � � � � E ��x � �' �� S�� U Q a � � � S � °� er axierrs�. ioow oEra�s �. A7.30 �� J 3.._.�_.,.,,.�.. �._m_.�.__....��,..._..�__�..d. � .,__�.,,._..�...,.,.�.._ww..w_ � ,..�,_.d,.....,..�.._�.,. �..�,�. i � f � 1 B a � Fj E 5@ 2 � � � Plen LepeM ��, Snow Sheddin� and Retention Plan �i 1 Nd �"+ ` � w= cJ F� H % .- #�� €�� E �� f� �r:'�.uwr�a� ��.rF.rmm �d�ao�.�+ � � O O <.1 � C 7 O <i m ao 0 � o ` Q � �~ .s ~3 � a �� C � � Z 0 � N � m 0 c m � m � m � 0 c � vp xw m.onaw S10-1 �w - --- --- "�-- .. _-- --- --- __ _ -- - -s-so- - - _ � - - _ �.�� ' �'� � � �. � � �� _- LION'S RIDGE LOOP �-------- _ i -� €�-1�= EE- -t�-E� - - - - - . -• -- LIC R.O.W.) i ( ' IRRIGATION LEGEND __ =`� z.��.--_�_ --- � � _ - - -- -- - N,._.._._`aS_._.`5.`= .€4�� v� _ -- - �� " � �` � � � EMRiERSCH�ULE << __. -_ _ _ - - - '_ ._ __ __ _ c "'. : r�*'v'.�:..�•c,�--tc - - " � � - - _' - - - - _ - - - - '-_ � �._.� . � - _ _ � � o°P"ime�r an� �n°�va - - -- - - -- -siso- � -- - -- - __ -" -'- - _. s�,--� �_..� _ _ " �� n c.5 - .- _. '_ _ - _. ' -. .. -i " - - _. _ { -_ °�`+`..^��- __ _ __'_ `. f- .. . _ . . . ... . .. .. . . � �� .. . .. 71� I6GAL 7(iRl 7 6(iPH - _' .-_ '_ _ _' _ _ __ � .... ..... ..._ ._ __.et`A- - ._ - _ _ - _ _. '_ - u��.+.,a - _- ' . .. .. ... .... ,. _ ._.. _ . . . __.. . . . � � � 11� 'XlOi( RGPN 1 lORI _ "_ .- _ - .' . ... --_' "._ - -_ � � --. _ .. . _._._ ._ __. ' ' .. _ '_ _ _'_ ___ _ _. _._ ._ _' _'_ E%ISf TOW-Bt�02 ... -_. _ _ _ � - _ .. . . . .. �. -._ �.:. _.. - Et50_._- -" . _'-_ . .... . .. � ._' _ _ ._ .' "_ _ _ _._ _ ' _" _'EXIST BEW=B720t _"__ � _ -'" _ _ " ._. .. , _.. _ -_ �`.t��C \�4'� � _ ' _ .-� __ _ _ . . . .. . . _ __ _ I � � tr$E'_. 11� �!p( YGHI S 12OR7 ___ '_ " '__ --' - _ _ -.._. ..__ I _ - - ._. y ..... . . ... _. ' .._. _.. .. -. M L'r__` _ - _ _.. __ "_. - -„ _ -" - - ... . . .. .. . .....1LLLSfiE WALL FAdNG TO . � . . . .... .. . � . - ... f ....... .. .. . .. . �- '� 5 � 1 GHI 2 2 _- _. _ ' ..' �-- _ '- -8:40--- _._ ,_ - '-' �_. ..._. "' -..__ _ ' . .AE MTA E7QS71NG . -- � '-- "- V ..�- e�•�� --_ " .-'_ _ .__. ..__ "' _ _ ". _" BE ]B(NRED. STAINED SINIRS 1(ihL 1 GHI 1 1 GPX ' - -- _. . . .. . _... ._ � -T - -- - - - -�_� ceeia+ w�u .. -�_ . �. . -� - . �� - '�'�`"�� ... ..__. _ _- - - -- - � - -- . _. ..___ �omaE�. itr. - � . .. �roc.c. - -�aa- - ._ -- - �' - ' � - rowaetso � i.--_--________________-- 7- - - - - �ow=e»a . il! xocrrt x wul - _- _ __ _TOw-aize.o _ eew-e�szs PIPELEGEND awssaorvc - - ecw-ma � � " '_'"-'_' 77 iow-elao � ' -_. �BEVr8i33.6 '_"'_'_-_ . _" ._ -_' . _.... . `_'_i Y0.1� BE1WB172 � ... �:. .. .... �TOw�91YO.5 . � • ,._,� dAW.lAISlALS .. .... . ........ 1 J/! LIO dM - (- �f -- - FJ�STINC CA&ON . 4�. .�M-8�129 TOW=81200 BEw-8109.5 ., ,'. 1' II-IS OPM �.�� . --� �-" . ....: it . . .. . i-1/* IF25 pM . ..._ .__. in�pcu ,._.. -gEW-lfOB7� .. _. '.. . � .._ I-1? 26J6 GPM 1'MN.WWlE TOW=EtiC . _ � ��...,. _"_ � � .. ._ . . bMGtlVbE�� atl . ..... ..:'.':.....'. .. ' � �M�N,•p ^E 9Ew-el0a __.,. . zo.t+ I ..._ .. �� ..� ��a�.�.�ma _ . � �.. _ . . . . . . . . . T'n�Vo-o�iyius x �.. � _... TOW-8115 .. . �.: .. . ..-t.- .. BEW=8106 812 TOW=8120 � - µ . _ _ BEW=8112 � � . �j-�. ._..._..._ _ _ . � -' � �..._ 9i07" �..._ _...__ _ _ .-.. - 8107 -.._ _ _.__.. _.. OB.O -� -_-_-___.-_"' (___ _..___"_"'.._._'.'__'__.'_' � .- 26 . --` J _ �oe s`" r DRIP EQUIPMBdT -___._ i6. _ � 105 .. 2.W� �. li 8109.5 �� . . � � � TOW�BIIB � u� � � .� . . C 10B . -.'_ HEW 33'. �IREIQGMICIR � 1d0A1BlQ � � /' --"' ' �. ._. �� BEW=eltl . _ �� f ; ��, � -- . .. - � . ....�. �� . . VALOVE nCNt5011�ORMPROVEEQNL OB o � �--' �``' '^- 8120 � -~, � , l� MTO E%ISTINC / . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . .. . . 81�� - 8109 .�. � - . . .. TOWxB071. M-FOVI?flIANVALVE � �' ; / . . �.�. . . . . . '. .�. . . . . . . . . .. . . - � .". . . - . . . ; . ..�. . .. . . . . . �BEwaB72Y. ' , GABION WALL . . . . . . - � _ --- - . . . . . I' - � APrlOV� �.CONIRACIORiC�6iN1 � i' � ^ ✓ � ~ EXIST TOW- � � � . . .. . . ' . . � '� ' . . . ' ' '.�. � � BEW�B10B.5 PVCDRPSY57FM-7�CBALT69�f 4 �._ _. � . B117t � �� . . . \ . . . � �� . / 1 c.. � -"' `--. ___ .,... _EXIST BEW-B1023 � . ' �' } .'�'� . . . . . . . . . , . FlMf19KP9tw/1R�bOWl1'/ L _ - "_ '_. .� . .�. /'� ' . ' ..... �.': ' ' . .' . . . � j� \ � . . . . . � . . �. . . . . . .-.-.� . .'.�. . .� -.",.� .- sr� / ..: ... . `-.. n. �_ _. _ PROPOSEDBWIDER �.. �_./ ... ......... �...(--- .... . ...- � . .. / ��_ .... . ..... �---r-, CAPORIENIOE77�IINGWA19111E ` ..�� ... ...... � . ... . . .... � � ..... �� I • rseTaNiNC wnu r .'.' . . . � � . . . . . / � . . . ' ...� g 1 - /� � � ( � .', �. f � -- � SPRAY HEADS , I �- I I 4' HICH MAX MIFlAOBIGN.�CYMiQFACHVUVEAMX �,,', � �� I � I � I - �_�� - - . - Ji _ � `��.� � � • ' 08 ` . - _ - � ao��aec,AC�uv� � _ � i ; � % � � �t �..._ ,. __., - - _ � - r.vc. worme crM .si � . ., . .i . ...�. - _ ... a t � `�;" pwr �o eoor �ne� io�s� � � .. 97 . . . . . . . 101 ......^^"": " ,. . , ,. N. .�... I ..•. ;. .�. ��.�. � 10sA�:; . �..� . ' AMIWOROUlORR11 � ]0 • 101 _ 1 . t� . ..� . � . ' . . . , : t� o _ � � _ �. � _ /. • '' � � - "�' f � �. . � . .. i1 - 6.7 � L•� � .� . ' . _�.•�•. - - _ � � t`.,--� .6 . MPJ000 ROfATOR RI! 19 �0 0 � .t � e e � / ❑ 8,4 •-�--' _..._. / u i /J . . .�,.: B �" .. . .50 ,�/47 . . . � . / i . " ' �� _ \ • � . . 70: 7 . - � 1 :1 � � . . _. .•.... � � �� r-.�•- �, ...�. ' � � NO1E USE RADIUSS AS �6fNUilON dCfA76 � � � ,� . . . . . . . l .o. � . . . . . . . . . . . _ `--- _=�'_�, ------- �� , . . :.. EQUIPMBdT - / ' � • ...- -� . .�. . . . ' . ' . . . '.� (II?WA79ME19fdffCIVIBIQ�lS%NLS. "_ . ._.__ .. _. . � .n - - ' .• � f-_ -. � -�. f ' � � . ' _ ' � .._ . --� � � � ❑ . . . _ . _ ' _ . ,. �,. � �� ,� 9B �� . . ' \-.r'� �. � 1 . . . S 3 .33 � - ' . . (tPRBSUlEMdVLOW Fl�VBA�t � 9B .__ - , �- _ __ � ; = .--;�' - '� � . \ \ . _' {845 • ,,. ' 915 9.51 �, � � . 9 � '� . GqRR1iROLONL2li�5fAl10N - � � , ; � . . . . QFF�CE �., - I ; '_' . . . . . . . m 9Z . .. . . . 85.3 . OA7E • .. _ ,.: .. . WAI9lp155Bt6800� \ ' ... .. .. . ' �II ' ' . ... . . � � .._., .. VALVEORAPPYOV� ~ ,..,` .,. , . . � . � . . . . �_ RMYD fi111C1[ COUPl6! i--�__ i . . . . . ... . .. . . ... .. .. _ . . � I � '�., . _.: .. . ' ' . � . " � ... . � � / O ti � __ , , _� MOOa NUMl9t 7�1iC O �\ I . ... . . :_�+I�, .. ' . -`l . X . '. . . . . . . _ , - APPROVEKiUNVNVElO1B t......! . , ... J , � .. . . � . . . II � .v�; . . . ,; GRSONaR i �.. . . I • � .. ... . �.. � : II a s � e ' . �� . . . . . . . . 95.3 -� .6 � �. 71E IFlll9DE�OF SflANf ANI9EAL IXE - �"'� ' , �: . � • : �.•� , sas�=ss __ -.:t- � � ' ' C .: ' . . :: ��...� 3.96 . ' _ -. � . 6. • � %AMWLWIRI71EAOpIp1NLPOMS � � � . -� _ -"- � _ � .i- � .. _....__ .. � �.�. -:. ro �.' ... � 2� � -� S . � I , 90� :'.�� i+ . .g♦ �"' � �,.� � � . . .. ,. b �fy . � fi .9... ~95 95.6607X 95.77 4,9683e : . �f'��%� ' i� . .24 �„y 2 SCI�/B1CIA6lRETOBEGIIAR�6IMC[/S I . ' 's ... � � � 93� .�, • � • • . • � T� �� .. 1 46 � � AY)IUFK.iUIlH)!YlACIQAOW PIiVB7110N , . s .:. � .. . . . . . BU�i�iTOP I y ' •. • � � • 9!4 OkVCEBICLO5IABNC.ORMPROV�EGUAL I �. .' . .��- • • • � .b'•' d� . R61tPOW�9tCOAT • . '/� 40C1• .�� ... . . . 1 .... 9.50 i ._. . � !:� "... - _ •._ � .. �CONCRETE � �. . � `•� a :. -.� a.], � 7.i BIClO6UREFOUI'OAlq11 OONC.9N i j RAMP ' ,... . � ...:: .;:, �� 93. '• � • . I, ' � 9]T3 � �� 1 _ � � ' � . COLdt TAN. FlIOVOEfT�CR fOR '_._ � � . � � ..., � � - '- � � l�l$�IAX . � -' � �, � I �,. 1 5 . , ' •• 1 . - . . . %.00 - .• � �j � b I .� ''{I � . .�_X _ ,. • 1 / • ,f i - � _ . - _ . . . . , _ _; _ o = '] - . � ,. , � : _. . .. � - . - - .� �� . ,..�. „ � _ - - ... .... ,. .- � � Eo. ,� �.�, .. . �.. F--'� . . . . . � , ..a�- . .. ... �• � . : � � _ � . �,�• « R �. ' ' �.,.�. � . . � - . �,r �- , A- „. , .. � -..,,..r.� % � � �.. ",w� � 90 7 , . ..' l ��.:we"r" .'� .'_4 . ... - _ .� - "'" g6 .t� � . �.� .... _ , r . _. ( � i� � ' ' , -^ e e �... • \ , � `� � � j::' _. .. .. e , � � 1 l : . . .. �' -•, ....� .. .._.. .� r v-.... .,_ n. �.. .: a. O V 1 t �,,.s. �. • . � .. _, � . . � • - . .. ,'. �-.` . , „� - .. " . ... � ' * ........., : .' • ' ._.:., '-, _� , • c . , .. . ., ... .� . , .�, ,.. �. ..::.� . �,.� �.�: '��• .:..... . ....- . . . :,:_ , .:...� .:�.. . ,, ,. .��` ." ... . .-i: ..�� . � - �� " . . Y� . - - _ _ �1 � J, JJ . „ . , : � . a � �, '., _ _ _ _ - _, ,. ,,% � r� � '� _ - .... , � W , . .. . .. . . ._. � ' � `- " �,� � �% 1r77ERSTATE HIf3HWAY No. O (R.0.1K,) _ Y . y, � ' ' _ __ T , . ' : . � -. ___', - . . . - W � h. � . . �- --�_ � �= - -' .. ` . . - . =-� -' � . � er� ea� - > - PUBLIC R.O J v - _ � � , � ' � � � :.:. ...._. ... ..�- _ .�-_ _....._ . . _ .. �...._ �_.u,,. �.... , �. _ ... _.. ... . . _ _ _ . .._..._ ...._..... ,. _ _ .._ ..�..,._ _ . . � � � � w � . � . - : . _..._.. c �. �._ . ., _.___ . - . , .;�: �_v..,. _.. _-_ . _ -�- -- - � - , . .�- - � _.._- . . . _ . Z .:_ _._._ ,... _� . - . - ... _� ...; -.-- .. �».- . . , , . . ... .. . - o........,_.�, ,,:. __._,s:�. ___-- _.__.. �. ____ : . .., ._ .. � . J ..., �'. " ., - . � ..._.__.,'_'-'� ,-'� ... ...__.. .... . .... _.0 .... _. . ____.. . ....... �� . v �' Q VAILTIMBER LODGE LANDSCAPE LEGEND relimina landsca e lan svr� �rr SHRUBS � saeqn GROUNDCOVER sv� �aa�u�nroe rcun� ;. �` ��^' scale: 1" = 20' • p�c.m+c wsver a�ua ca�Nw�os� s r,�w s�wxuvs uw�oe�ss s crw � �� 1 wt/ a�ow�ir �e r WB �, O amg ur� s cnU O smi� sv� s wv �� s��errs n��'w�earm� i c�wa �y o PUlKiB6 GWK'A &IC/14 O COTOUN�EA57ER L�I�IDUS 5 GN4 �O POTE� FltUTICOSA 5 � MLSC WIIDR.OW9t5 1 G�1L/ OOLORA00 SPRIICE 6'-8'/20 �� HEDGE CO70NEASiE0. SHRUBBY CINQU60IL e�� u� sa�n � �.oM�u n+w�wrn�� s cnU O M�scwrmus wsoawwn.ows s c�U SURFACE MATERIALS suavrv WS X ACIMRNTE TWINlERRY IWIEYSUCME AMUR SIWHt GNI►SS SHR�D� HM�WOOD MUIW- a SVIREA�M�Pa01�Q�G 5 WU O PBIMSENM ALOPCQIROID6 5 Cdl/ � Y DBTH MO@IUM. U1IiC8EAF CO►70NWOOD � �:4 GINWLLA MMIE 2' Glju COTONEASTER APiCt1lATU5 5 GAU � VIDURNUM TR608UM 5 GILL/ � 7URF <,YNODON WCIYIpI - M AfFR GLABRUM O p�N � M�� Y� 5 WU AM9tICA1J 1/�URNUN MYBNID BBIMUDA'l�DiON' ROCKY MWMAIN MAPLE 3� CAU4 X SPIRFA VANlqUI7E[ ° a`�auT�us s�xcviarr� MUGNO PDIE OO v�wHamesr�w 1� IRRIGATION l r�srn w�wrnonN r uuu �wa�wa� uHUtt� is r,rw 0��lEMA OCCIDHliALiS � CORN'''�US SE� 5 GAU IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PERMANENT AND 3' GN/Il O R� lWIG D041N00D SHALL BE DRIP EMfTTEHS ON TIMER- �n� R� �� TURF TO BE SPRAY HEADS ON TINER o.d.,w « u.,,y� r �arar� � W � � � � � Q � O � � L�� O I Z Wz� � O �OU `� W � V W F#�PFfiEYB i PARIlQiB AF�VIIlEC1S, LP. o�m+o �so urwieunao Pr9ni•wr Iv;ia.�ra cvw orwm�e � wYw �eva�cw iu�atK awoo nmsc wWU�yln�mw ..11 � � • hump a landscape arcNtecMe, lc mvobbm .�.am ms a�mn p111w,'M1N.61B0 NlLA1.9tl1 . 1pbI11�Wln �. 81ffTCOHIBR& �' P��/Yr�4P� � s�r►a. L-1 - � � ■ � . � .� .� � '� •�' ' • : �� .��'�I`a�a.'i�'.�`�� : � �`,�t �r �.� �� .� �,. , . '0� .,e„�' �� ,.l. , �� r/ �r` � .�� _ ! f . . . ;� ��.1�� .i� -- - - - , '� - - - - - - _ ,�. _ -,� `-�-`=� _ _ _ �w- - � �� ;,,� �i 1 �1 . -- -- --- � .. _ .. ..: �� ' �_ .. -� ___ -_- — �� '�� . f� � ��+ � �� . �- �� , � ---� � � ��=�9� � � � ��i t��i � �� °��`�'�`!"� f �al ■_ ,-- � ti� � ��` � , . . < < . < . .�� . w ��*; �,�1 y� �� : ' , � � � "� 1�%l�� ' � '# �� 1�1 �r i �+„` ��,� �,,..� �� ; a',;.�G_'��' \ �° . 'p '� ', � � �a M �� , . ��. 1 �� , I �� .r:; _ - - � � � �� I' - . .. ._ �. . �,_� �� ,.=1:1 `i�� '� � �I ��1 i �° ,i� � '. �, - � _'��.1�� e � �►�� ------ �j�� s�, _ 'l � �� ;�� ; , — ' i �!, ��P � �� . � : I � �� I �� . !� , .• � � �; y . ` � L .�• '� � ��JJ�,L� �iL�� J�1 L� �J�:.� � �`' < < I � � .� ,, .. _ _ _ M _ ;� . � - ', -.. .. _ - _ ' _ L r _ r . . ! Y L'p • - � � . O� 'o - . _ _ i � - L - ��'��i�'� . ` -�- ,�1� �i ' �w.7 s��..��. +�r�. � ' v _ �� - - ��': -J� .. i�_ � r�' .- IS�_,-��\ G� � +� 1\�r��.}��"�'�� s.� � •o� �i �� i► �' �"��- � /�re ' �� ; �,�� r � i +■s'� � �-'�l,� . �� j� .,��. �Y" �` �'� � °?�- '� .. . , ,, �� : ��.' . . �,� .� � � ,. ... ��";� .�. � ` � _— j �:��, .--. a I�. il " - . � , . .� � � ; ��` : � � : — -- .. . .:� - , ,; _ � ,.: . :� , � . � _, _ � � �� _- _ I.�_—_ �• •••- � � - � �'�'— ��!� , " ° . r _ -• ;��, ,`! e . ' �u _ ��#,� �:�� / �� ' ---' "C�� ' ^ �� '�"�k �-��'' " � j��"�' �M� a�+r`► ��p,, i�� i� � �• �; � �,� _.__�-�- � :�-� --_ - _.� .� -.. • ' — ' — • I,�I�IIi.�� . �: J � � I �—� ��;��i�dt� � I VAIL TIMBER LODGE LANDSCAPE LEGEND sn�s �an SHRUBS sae�s � � �� s cu/n � % eeruu cuwu�os+� a�owm Z. � %� ��' eoc sma n�ouurr aue�vvlF O RIDrs aPU�u� PUNCaB�LSGWKJI &IQ/LI O ALPINELURRANf � COLORADO SPRl1(P 6'-8'/20 � ��Ep��E CpTONE0.STE0. e�eluw�n smucF �-an � �oHi�u u+w�wau� o S X AWMDURE ��Y �E u�� 9. W4 � SPIRFA NIDPOIQU Gll11MlA � SNOWMOIMD GDIW�U MAPLE 2` CAIJ7z COTONEASTER APILVlA7U5 � ^ ACERGU9RUM 4iMIB6tRYCOTOPEASIHI p� "ROCKV MOUMAIN MAPLE 3' ULLJ4 OX �NUS MUGHO � p {,rwTAEGU55UCCVl81�A MUGHOPOIE rwa�na� uraFO�u �(a�o a�n wavr��onN 3' ut/s3 seiw�ar � pE7��p�Qpg�� O CORNUSSERICEA �71yE yyg� ypp� 3' GN/11 R� 7WIG DOGWOOD .� . �Ji ,.,_ , _ • ., yt � - ��j _,sp�r. _ � - _, f . ��. , � �g•r"�� ,� - w�,._— �� ',�— � .� ♦ �_ �i ,�° �� °�' � ► ii , . - . .� .�.11li�ll�l��n� �;�,�'I;'jj!In�, � � � � � ____----..___.. .. .-- � - -- saeqn s cav siweixla c�►woeass s cu/ + O svan�sv c� LllA1C5 5 GNU � POTENTILLA FRUi[COSA SHRUBBY CINQUffOIL s c,w O nrsc�vmus wsccw�a�rtioxus AMUR ALV9t GRASS 5 GAV O PBilQSETUM ALOPEQIROIDB 5 WV FOUNfARIf�iA55 � VIBURNUM TRIIABUM 5 GAU O AM9lICJW VmURt11N4 jj SVINEA VANHOUR9 iscw v�wHO�mesv� 5 GI1U ---� —_ _ _ _ . . G� NDCOVER sr�s �rr s c,�u/ �tuc,� n�rus i cW � � � a�m�ars �ena i c��p 5 �/ � s�acerrs �u�ei M�C WD.DFLON19tS 1 GI1l/ SGNJ 5 � SURFACE MATERL4LS � 5 GIUJ � SMR�D� HARDWOOD MU101- Y D�IH MU04UM. 5 GW � TURF -CYNODON CJ1CIYlDN - HYBRID BBIMI�A'MIDLiOM 1� IRRIGATION IRRIGATION SVSTEM SHALL BE PERMANENT AND SHALL BE DRIV EMLrfERS ON TIMER- TURF TO BE SPRAY HFADS ON TIMER relimina landsca e lan scale: 1" = 20' � u.�.��r �' �y w aarsan.e .._a._. s+au � � � . -. . �� .. . . . . . . . jjj / ' ' ' ' . . 1 __--r_� _ . . ..-.-"�. _ . . ,_� , . . ' . . . . . . : --__ . —.-�. . . . . . . . . . L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _y .- :-�- � 1 �4A o aa.aa� �a� � eooe . � �� 8.50 � � owars) �5. � � ' $� � ' 1 b: l � � _�� • �c�e� ' � M I � 3 i,x +N�) w ��r_�/� �� ' "____ X n.�,° yw. ° ` 93 5 f(93.5) � , � � ,_ , ; 93. " o � . . o.. � . . . . . _ . . . � � . . . . ..,. �.... . . . . . . . . . . .�_. .. ... . .. . ... . . : .. . . . . . !i . . . . . . . . �� . . . . '. . . . . . . . . � . .__ _.��. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . , . . . ��.:.._ : . . . . . . . . ---.---j. . . � . '� � il . . . � ; i. . . . . . . � f � ' �. � courtvard #1 enlar4ement �T courtyard #3 enlargement � scale: 1" = 10' � courtyard #2 enlargement � scale: 1" = l0' /�l cou ard #4 enlar ement scale: 1' = 10' � py�ah �' mmy. � weWUShm�� ....__._ s»m � FI NAL PLAT TIMBER RIDGE SUBDIVISION A RESUBDfVISION OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION BLOCK C, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS I, 2, 3, 4� 5 TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLOI�ADO Gore Range Surveying,��c j_�-,. P.OBoxti - Avon, CO 81620 (9�0) 479-8698 . fan (9701479�0055 ��y� in � ��{kt�. VJJD LSE SUEVAPHY VPRC1 nHFJ� ZONI':G nJLWE�S I LO'i <.8:0�(:. NIAAi1N(i Glb-IAIf�( 1:kJ11pRTMfR�JtliFG�ROA�t'JC5f . I.OT4 5.^a=pC. �WUS�NG qSiA�CT �FROfJTnGEaOMtYEST 10 cF.� AC. 1�RJ GENERAL NOTES: 11 MTLGr5l1FVFY:GECEIAffCR.200B. 2) PROPf-RT'�[SGPI?'IOFI: LOT51.2.3, 3 6 5, A Pf:SUOCNISiM` 0-11p�15 R�CG[ SUC�NISI(N!. FIOCK C. PCGGF�Y.G TO P IC PI �TTI If.RfOf �I:COF]EO JLHF. B, i9)] IN �OJK i:5 �T P�Gi a56. UNDEa R[CfPTiON Ho. ti5305, I�J TY.E �==�CF. OF Tllr EnGLE C;ALJ'N CLE!IK AN� RECORO'cP. � 3) UtAHItiGS6A5tDIY�IX11HtLL"ItG.^.WItClIfICTH=MONUNENi5F5UtSGfiltllUHEHFJNM0.HY:IIJ�'IHESGt1ThVkSTEIiLY ar�u n�rMUdesi era�•r cc�wens or ec�o �oi �, etiNC n��a ��w �ste ail r z1. <) MONU.IUITAINMRSI:�UICAiEUHEHEON. �� *resa.evur,��eo=�rrnsrun5locuew�noesnioirnsi.2,o.<ssrcen�re�orsiaa.ar:olocrenrEU+o VRCPTE CE(iTN:N E55UACF'-5 AS Ii�OM.NTED MEf:EIXl. E) TN[BtHF:p�flYD�MEt151'Y!l.EA�EMEMSPNDRIGHrS(1FWAYiH(TNIIHGIicC:Vh11='GH�HlI��!;(ifIJV�ATHi1i1NE SUIUFLT PROPfflTV All� TITL' SF..�pGli GfFlOFM=-� 11� STf. W Aiti TTI f. fURF�4ITY �,qAPAIJV, nRJ�fi Nn. 9p8i5], f RTf.fI l.Fqll. ]O.:IMiS. AT>:'i(1 AG. n N'JTICC:ACCG?DINGTOLOIO:Rli�UWVOUMUS'fAA!M�NCCAlIYI.fGaI.ACTiJNPTS_�I:PG1�f•iYf]CiEGTVdT1113 S WVEV \YfIHCV THR�E YEFPS �REa YW FIPST GIY'AVEH S�J:A1 G�fEGT. II! NO cVE\'.-. M�Y �NY nCT1C/J PASEC JF JI RtlY OEF�CT IN THIS SUi1VEY NF. CbE11A%!lCCII l.'OFF T-iqN Ti�N YF�qS fRG}.1 iHf- OATF Ci� CEP.P., ��C�TKK! SIIbNN N[RFGII. ej THEPRRCRSS/M�WNNERF.GMnaE5U5lECTTOGRO'F.TivECOVEIlAYTSRcCORJEDJJlv15.t95911l�1�2�6�T�AGF. fi<y, RN� A'.1t;iutU iN I IIM1 i�5 i HUMlNT nECG4UfL Ik BGOK 21Y A� I'RG_ 235. Iu�IU NLC�I iO�:n'_ �EG WIt4'.IU� Gt i+HOIlC �iVc WVENM:TS INl tlLU(:X (:. IIUI� S I�i�Jf:t SUtlU1V510N AECOHJ[� JU1l� 8, t9)J I�I Y�p( 2N xl PAGt .5]. 9) ': HE tiI1BJECT FP7P:qT/ IS E�'CIiN]FRED "iY AN UI1DFflG11WN� R�GNT�OF�Wq� FA .EnIEtlT ��RPtRFD Tll11GLY C1i0ti5 lLCCTRI^ A�SCX:IFT:lJI11Nf,. fiFCOPLIFG OCT(YIER 15, t.f0. Ii: tl'J02111 �T TA(.F 210. Ni HE(:EV'f{IN ��. PO`5M8. � I+E 6CSCHI�Tp.`! Gf TIIE FASCAI�M IS h T[N `CO2 WIDC iTeiR fOLI OtYING Tl lf. �fiA.l �1I I IN[5 A� CU91f.fi �NO IS INiU: f1�1[NTI Y �I:f.fWS�ONEU TO A.^.LVF�T_LV GFSIGT THF LOCATtON OF � f1E FJ SFIpE`iT HcPEOI�. iM nLL HGGEREfA;ES TO HECCHU OCCUA1E11T:: aNE TO TNE NEnL ESTA�G riFLOiiDS OF i �:E O'rF:LE OF' TMi En4LE CCUN i I. COLCflRLO.GI.FRK�nOR�CUPOER. 11.'p�.E'D •'}�E:yTR� L'if0�1 � Ei�la1�� IZ y�°rir� CR�are� �.tD V� E�4�i�.rrs Certificate ot Dedication and Ownership Know nll men hy fhese presenis that Timber flitlpe Albrtlabla Ho�ing Corporafion, a Cotora�lo na�prolit corporation bcing sulc ovmer in fee simple and U.S. Bank Nzlional Association as mongagec ol all Nat rcal property siwaled in ihe Tov+n ol Vail. Eaglc Coun�y. CcloraAo des:sibed as follows: A Hesubtlivision ol Lion's Fidyc Subdivisian Block C, Lols 1, 2, 3, 4 8 5 per the plat thereof recordotl June 8, f 573 m Boo: 229 at P�ge 458 under Flaxption No. i25309 in �he ollice ol;he Eay1e County Clerk and RecoNer, conla�nin9 �0.082 acres more or less; have by these presents litl oul, platted artl subdivideA �Iw_ same i:,to bls and bbcks as shown on Ihis linal plai urber Il�e nan�e and ctyle ol Timbbr Ridge Subtlivision, a subdvisan in Ihe Tor�n o1 Vail, Coun�y of Eaple: antl tices hereby eu:epllhe mspunsibility lor Ihe completion ol �equ�retl improvemenis; aM Goes hereby dvd;ca�e antl v:t aparl ail of the Dublic roads ontl oiher puNC improvemams aritl placec u sl�omn an the accmnpanyinp plat to the use o( �he public iorever; antl does hx�nby dedicate rtiose portions of soid real propeAy nich ara indica�ed as easeriwnt cn the accompanying plat as easemenis �a Ihe purpose stwwn hereon; an0 dce; hereby gram the righ� �o install and mantain necessary s;ruUUres lo Ihe entiy mspansible for pro�iding �he services fw which Nc easemeMS are esiablisAed. EXECUTEOIhis_.________ dayol______.______ ,A.D..20_ Owner. Tinber Rid7e Afiordable Housing Corporalion AdUrzsr. 75 S. Frontage Rd. West a Cobrado innprolit corporal�on Val, CO 07657 By: S'fATEOF__ ) I� CAUNTY OF _ ) The �oreganp Cen�cate of Dedicalion arA Ownership was aciawwietl9ed be(ae me IM� .___ tlay oI , AD., 20_. , by _______ es ol Timber qiGA° A��ord�Ok Housin9 Corpo�a�ia . a Coloredo nonprotit c�oration. . MyCOmmiesionexpres:_ _________ 'Nitne=_s my haM and ollicial seal. Notary Public Mortgagee: U.S. Bank Natlonal Assccialion AOdress: ___ BY _. r�a: STAI'F OF � )� GGUNTY OF ) 1"he foiegdng Gertilicatc ol Dedication aritl Ormership was ackirowledpetl belae me Iltis _day of ____'.'_—___"—_. A.0..20_. bY as ___ _'____'__of U.S. Bank Nafion�l A6.Afialion. MyCommis,ionexpms:,, ___..________ UJimess my hard antl uHicial xeal. Nolary Publi: Tille Certilfcate S�e.vart Ti�rv Guaranry Company tloes!�ereby cenity Ihat thc'fitle to ail IarMS slrown �yon ihis plat have been oxamir.ed ar�tl is vestetl in Timber Ritl9e Aflordable Housing Corpoiation, a Coloratlo nc�rofii coryoralion, Nal litle �o s!icii lanus is iree:.nd Gear of all lians and encumbra�xes, �zccy.t as tollows: Deetl ol Trust to U.S. Bunk Natiunal Assttia�ion, recerdetl July 17, 2f703, under R�ceplion No. 840Et0. D�led I�is __ �aY ot.__""'__.'' A.D.. 20. ___ Agent siqnatum � _ .__ / tldress:97 Main Street. Suite W201 Ed�vards, CO et632 n4em namc._._._.__..__-_ Attachmertt D Covn I�u61�c. v1�alc� Co� . Surveyor's Certificale I, do hereby cenify Nat 1 am a Protessional LaM Surveyor licensetl untler the laws of 7he State of Cobrndo, Ihat tliis plat is frue, wrrect ard complele as laid oul. platted, dedlcated and shown hereon, thal such plat was matle irom an accurale survey of said propeny by mo and untlor my aupervisjon and cwrectly shows tne localion a�M 6mE�nions ol the lots, easements and sireels ol uid subtliNSlon as Ihe same are 5takeE upon Ne 9rountl in cortpliance wnh appliWblo regulalions governing It1e suD6vi5ion ol IeM. In Witness Whereol, I have set my hentl and seal Ihis _ tlay ol A.D.; 20__. Samuel H. Eckcv Cobrado P.L.S. No. 3009� Town Council Certilicate This plat apOroved by Ihe Town Council of lhe Town ot Vail this day of a.d 20_, lor � tling wilh the Clerk and Recortler of Eagle Couny, Coloretlo and for IM cwrveyance 10 tl�e Town ol Vail o� the public tledicatlons shown hereorr, subjeq to �he provision Ihat approval in no way obligates ihe Town ol Vail lor mairnenance ol roads tletlicaletl to Ihe Wblic unid conshuc�ion ol imprwemems Ihereon shall have been compkte0 in acmrdance w'�Ih Town o� Vail specilicalbns, nnd Ihe Town Counc4 0l Ihe Town of Val has by subsequent soluiion aryeed to underlake maimenance of the same. This approval does not guarantee Ihat sdl coMNions, s�twrface B�bgy, ground water cond'Rions, a Hooding contlilions of any bt shown hereon are wc� Iha[ a builtling permit a any olher require0 permit will be issued. This approval is wim the understan6rg ihat all n*penses imoMnr�, all improvemenls requlred shall be the responsibitlty ol Iho subdvider antl not fhe Tavn of Vail. ATTEST: Tovm Gerk �yy� 7own ot V�il, Colorado 7nxn Council, Town o� Vail, Colorado Planning and Environmental Commission Certificate This linal pla� was approved by Ihe Town of Vail PlanMrg anA Errvironrnenfat Commission tlns _ day ol ,a.d 20_ ATTEST: Town CIeM Chairtnan ' Town ot Vail, Colwado Town ol Vail Plannirig arie Envrtonmental Commission Certiifeate of Taxes Paid I, Ihe undersiQ�red, do hereby certiiy 5hat Ihe enf re amaurrt of taxes antl assessrt�ents due aM payabie upan all parcels ot real est te described on ttus d� are paid in IWI. Dafed ihi5 _ day of , pA., 20_ Treasurer of Eagle County FEB ' Clerk and Recortler's Certificate This Plat was li�etl lor recor� in No Olfice of t�e Clerk and Recortler at _ o clock _� on pris_ day of , 20� and is duly recorded a� Recep�ion No. �sEM�'r'S • Clerk and Recorder Depuy r y � �" z/s/aom �� .. SE ,�.a. 03-092PCAT 03-092 � 7 2 f"� Z •" Z t� Z60-£0 °V � 1V7dZ60-£'O """""'"''O 3S ''a ��i° / 5500-6Lt (OLfiI *el • 2698�6@ IOC6) � GZ9 L9 OJ'�np OlOZ/6/Z yYO 35 '"a N°�d° / St �e 0tl � . . 313t �OJNNISI�S �� u��(an�ns � ',k� .. . �v� nnr;rrirttv „�i cHnoi� a�ue� aao� � . �Q�'(�� __-- I og o�• . � (s�a�a� ��N ��3a> 61'� � � n Z 'oN JNlll� o�� ` � \ � � NOISIA108f1S 3�4Ri S,NOI� Z�5 j r, � �c'?d�b 8 l3�aNd � C>CL SS' , d3�3k1 ' /i '� i \ �B H NG.• �Z \ '!1 OB � 4au! , 6L� ' lF,yiSt35J-� �y�i ' 1'�. lJ G i Y33.i NI ) . ��j N3n i ' � ,; � \ ' l f j. �� _ - -1 .:. \ � e � � � ` � � ��, 'JNI�'ll!10 JNL51X3 NY JO . ' \ �� J . '' � , :NIl1l10 3H1 S1b]I�NI '�'� � ��d�S JIHdd�� a o oa / , _, 7 ' \ � Ot / � � / , oaz� �/. . c° / . . � ,`6,` �- ,� ' � /� � 53}fJY1 O4B�f � � � �� .9061 �'..� .� . , - ., " � 1�� . � J � � / � t600f 'ON'S"l'd (469S6L 'ON '�3' '0 = lf 6Q/f �' q - ' l� /�7 � l Atl� wni+inmv ,{i v/M 1N3W3SY 1+ �4., � . H3L13H5 Sf1B g` �/ � � . J U'>83N S'CN 135 531H�IOId1 AO'OS� ✓� �'' � / \��. ..� � � ..M1{ 1L60.L� � m :/ ��`• �. �//lbld SINl ..8 03lV�YA � � "� \ Yll /,LiPdONd � � �'L p � �N � �' � � � i_ ��.,� _` + lY id S'.! AF. 031y3i7� . � .. ., , . , / .. /�,i�4 \ � rJCB� 7 1H3%135Y3 Alllllfl aMY � IYUIYL(1 �Si3J�tl \ fp� � \ � 7 i�' '6/ocr 1 OP3` /b�' � ltll� SINi AB 0:1Y3tJ '� 4�� n �'� ��( ! IJ3�Y3S!3 SS3��Y CHt� JO15 Sf1H �� . C�� f I �, • I ' � �� \ � � .. � O`-�,, � � � \\ G S' ` `'� . / . . / � � �]�v�] ��'jy � S�y �.\.. Lb J �/j_ \� ' \, 1V�d SIN1 AB 031tl�d� g'f,q69 / ydy ��`s s, ' , -n .. �. �i�iaw�sra einan . � � �"s,�\ I� �+ _ �% � � - �� 'OU. .� \ ��°.�' " a s " � � � / ... i � e�l `j,� `' � 4i 'ti .. ,�s��t � 6°`e�'� �Prdt� � ,,o�� 2 o�,ti � � dy�o � / .� i � � �• / �,9 � r �i � 99RZ_��.1I—� � � \� O� � . - 9 or a 7sw �✓ J /� / `��,�l��. pr ��, ,�e� /% ` , �moc �v s�a � ivd si� Ae a�r3a�� • �.• •� 'i� � � � " / a�tisvn� ssrae i y ,� , 3�:n uva aad ��'� u., �,LO � / /.. / `, fLV� litlN NJ Y 135 Q f ,. 2 fpLi� lbld SI111 A9 �31YJYA J S-•� � � � �J � V ' ` JNII A:tl3d0ild ' \ . � CO"0! . � � / 9�` � •.f.O / /`. / l �Z ..Bl'Sl / �J ^ -� ,bt. � �� , i 4a � .,�V l� �,0� ,��i.rO / lna siNi xe a�v�vn_ `,. ._. i �`..'r y<� cL'71' C� � aNn ur�dovd ; tv�e siru aa a� �vn� !� a�a OS' . � � % / � � _ � uurnsv� unu` 56 .�(�.. � (� 'd � ' ? � � O \ i L�y �fi '/'as,, c�. 6� � � �' � ` �0g ;' - y m ta. � S,� �" � � ; . � n, � y , i � � Zi � / ' � � �`� -�'ld SIHl .:H (13lY�tlA ,.L 65 ��O\ . `` �'�., % N3 i3'>tl3 �'d�AYY.d >t J,lt"!LLfl y.f`,`0.C9`� f F � / '� � ' ' ' .DO'!.E Q� / . / / j 'i„bT..GLL�`I D� � � aq�: `�% � ' 6,�5� ' 091 � �. ��\\ \ / ; ' s3a�� ze� � ' . �' • _ ` j / '�° 'O6 O i� . . � �' lYld Slfl AA 03iYJtlA i. % �.�\ �.. t. . �l �� 31111 A!H3d0iJd , .� `+ �O� \ �}�� . � �� \� �� / ,/ �l � � �. � i', i L"P O � \ � � .\ 46'�� .oe��y� � �\ ' � / `.� ' �AO•(' � .� yti3� /' } ! / < ,., : _ ,,, � ny4 /' ti y f � `6cFy�,N l/ � ' i` ( � 7 '' � �� i�nd ��v� x a3ina� �rY'� /�,, ` / �, ` ur��r7sv� w n ouv a�rwroaa .ot �� . . \/ \ , .. . . 1:'ld SIHL AO 0_lY]HA � l� �� / I�� ' / : I.N3v135Y3 30NILtlLd A UNl� / ,,�_�..� �,,- ;�� ,. ` dvo rvrnnw�n-ivt .{i v %M ob�r < \ . e/ � / l � \`' , � / /r �� aveaa s �oN ias saiv�in�n po o� / \ \� � l / ` �' ,. . ; �,� � p0'/ ' � / '� /v' � ._%. � � __ yy�t . �`�5.. lYld SIHL AB 03Itl3tlJ �/ \ :��.��.�� 1/•1� I �W `` � . ^,n. r•\ 1N31Y35tl3 3�nNIYtlO pl ^� - � � �6 ,D6'ES - M.f>,BZAlN (6 310N 335) / � � /� � "� 53NI1 � M.tZ.fZ165 /]kLL�313 03Mt19�� ' / y i � I JO NOLLtl�O� / I � ��f � . / .Oe'Lb /� /�`. /�'• 31VY11%OildddV 3,6S,9C.BiS �' �v �� I ofi.,� � `o, � � � % , . �„ 3„oo,S£.£SN = �21 M.ii.cz.�>s \� ` . , � i �1.fS.5f.f4S ° 9ilILtl3E ,94'L9£ = OLIOH� � . .sres�\ �. ,y �� `'� / / .c�'eoc � atro�r � oR ,If'S81 = 1N_7Nb1 ,ZL'ti9 L = 1N39Nd1 3.6f,9C.9f5 ' � \ % .GL'69i - JMY / \✓' / ..9Z.ZS.LL = Y113C £L'89£ _ �21V . I 1N34'13SY3 `1N371HJtl0 �N3 .SZ'G �y ; `y J .S6':H/.�. = SMOrH �� C,`.l t = bll3a � 3.tZ.ft.l4N \ ;/� . ' . ina snu ee u�v�a� ,S6'LLLL = Sf114V21 ,8Z'�£Z — 3„L£.60.L£S 1N3�r�sr3unun � aNV 3�vNnao s� � �� fBIZ 'ON 'STd NtlQ3L' S 'ON V NO ltl'd SUIL AO d]lYJtlA / - dy� �LLStlld „['t o pNnod 1N3�Y]S/3 3,1tlNiVN(1 i A1�T,(fl �v' (SOlZb9 'oN '�321) / swnwiwoaNO� � Shcll� A0�0'S / � Oa`d?O�O� �O �1b1S `��d� �O J�LN(10� `�idn �O NMOl `� � � `� `z ` i slo� �o Noisinia9ns�� d `� ��o�g Noisiniagns ��ai� S�NOn �o Noisinia9ns�� e �IO IS I� IQg�1S ��Q I�I �I�SI�I IZ lt�l� �dNl� � 4 � fi4�N OF VAI� ' Department ofPublic Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 970-479-2158 Faz: 970-479-2166 www. vailgov. com T� T � To: George Ruther, Director of Community Development From: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer Re: PEC Review of Timber Ridge Redevelopment Date: 3/16/10 The Town of Vail Public Works Department received the revised PEC Timber Ridge Redevelopment plans and response letter on 3/11/10. Based on these revised plans and responses, the following list of issues shall be conditions of approval. Each of these issues shall be resolved by the Developer. The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit or as further noted within. Conditions of Approval: Transit Area; a. Show a pedestrian connection along the north side of the transit loop (w/ stairs as needed) to a crosswalk across the west drive entrance to south of the club entrance. West Entrance ArealParking; a. The drive lane shall be shifted south after the curve as it enters the east existing housing to maintain the eacisting parking on the north side of the drive aisle b. Relocate the ADA paxldng as discussed on 3/15/10. No parking shall occur within the Transit Area and Transit intersections. 3. Fire Lane/Ped Path Areas; a. The Fire lane/ped path connection to the entrance drive shall feel pedestrianized, yet accommo�a#e cmergency vehicles and maintenance vehicles. The fire lane shall be modified as per the discussion on 3/15/10 and the conceptual sketch as provided on 3/17/10. Final approval may require additional changes when a more detail plan is provided. 4. Engineered analysis on the existing condition of the gabion walls to remain will be required, details on how to eonnect to existing gabion walls and how to build walls beneath the existing gabion walls will be required, as welI as construction shoring plans showing no impact to the adjacent properties. 5. Frontage Road; Attachment: E "�t �r , ,T r.. :-- � R r , ,.--. r' r-� ., � ,.-• _.. � - , _. _ . M G. �i & 'u .. �.,.:, : ::.= � _ _ �. - -�::74Z G T;vy! : �Z��%��.. ; - ' --- ��3 �= [--E c.,t T�c.� ��sT�2c'G t�t=D �. 1 cGg G� !' vY! �= f� !- ('�c� c= 1 1�� —� ��o -� �,�� ;�. _ -� . -----� . , _..,._.�._.... . ._� , �� ► _ .._._ _ 6. � ��-. Z l �c __�.s� k��d � � l v�. � 1. t� � � s�-�o ��(,,�-� _ � �o��-- ? _ s �c. -----_ - -_ _ . . .�. _ _ _2.2.�, Zs�f � _ 1. l ___ _Z �Z, s� � C-�� -- �J[L�t � --� ��.1�..�R �' K� �� --a � u�or.z �' ;✓k�R �-. �.s .�.c` r�-z.,.�... 5 r�--�.c �= __T.. __..._. _.__ �V'�1� a �� "1 r ►�5 I 11J�./��J� �C{ �� 1 _ �fl��l� . l= �..1 �l i t.ZO �l wl� U iY-�-�.. ISS�.! �=5. ,/l i w1 L. --� l� �l �� l..'�l i c�,! �n v-�s T� i c�✓k r�� _ -i-I/��5 0 �c-r'c. o w�<- • �5��. _ _ C�t_1�C_�� ti-1 --'� ��.t�`�ST�GZ i vkz� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ��.� . .."C�. u m� u n�t�-i o�1 pf �'' -7b .� � - � 'g v►� � 1 l i o �.1 = nc=sr�'�1 ;� {�`- ��sst�� . -�z� oc-�` ..(��'-c�L.r o �.1 �R v-k i...l5 � R rv-�- �-,• o�...l s�s t�� ' �., i o t15 }� i � � ' � � � � //V� �C :� . � � p r' }�d-}�'�cy.�3, �.GZ S �'1�Y �-�--�L.D Z t � -- �C..i �� l.,t�+�-- ` �t�.-.� Ct�/l�or� �cx�r� • � 6 { _' � E.R vYl . c � U5� �� • � r��=. L�c. . �� nc� . n�.4-�-.� �t-- i �c..= �! i G �1 ' L � vv� r � -�-�n�= �✓+�� s�,rt-Z �v-�c� . ' 'D�=�. Sr�s FoR ��.,�s � �1. - �Ru�- �l .�c-�b ' �l In � c v-� u ' �- ��...c �. � c�l�r �'�� '�o vr� �our�ct� }�c�.. • � �. - t� �f� ��...� � ��-lSt c.-c� �D < i (�.! Z l � '�� n� i-� L.�� o u�r' ��.c�'C"' Cd� r� i�-ious m� ��.X�o�t�-. . -- ___ _ __ _ _ _ . . . � �U�._ , .. ��zl�.; ,� . � c�v� ov.�u �51� . � 5 �.ow l=Z�.vv�o.�w-�. . �Z.o 5 -� . [1 � .: "�4�i D __ _.._ _ , ' ��cx'aGC'�_ oc.�5i � : ' °'1/V1 ��:T' c� ��ic.�v�ri v�,� . '!- ol�. -� �= t-.��t��= -E-l��. Tc�u�..! �.o� . -�oi 4 c...� �-5�r-i�t� <is 1�� c� � 7`'c . _ ___ _._. � `12 C--�t� �. . L�urJ�c.�.4-P�. ,�l�l �o��ii __ _ _ _..___ _ __ - ---_ ___--- ' � �C,. �= U S�JJ�-G.�= t.�D�, l �� ' � i� Lt �..1 i �S ��e �c.GZ�= ---�p ' 'Dis v-�c.��zcs � v�.� l S ��c� I/�t� �-t2 lG i�-t� Si'►QU.G.1?a f�c . , �o� l �� i C�Di L, tJc =. t-iC-LI � � `� � . � l �.10 u� � �--5 �i i C.� E. �, ' _ Cc�ur�i �'ou5 0�' t��Rov.�, '� l�2Vk►-a,T r"�.b�t� U 1 v�R oc...l . l � ` -aa�.� �Q��- S�� 'DiSV�R�,� ' t.lo'. �l Cow��i�;�i �� uO�c1 5 f bGZ� cs � �� -p�ao�c �� . - �c��G..�4t.. �.. o �l • S i '' - 0 _ __._ _ _._._� . ��1 !'��.� i �,c }�-{n�. Si Zc'- o� `l-� � rz- C� �-a c..i � �--✓-►�-t �S c.... ; �. �.T�u� f-�r� S�_Gc-- -- T� �1 uCGi � � � ' CvuSI-�c�c..r-i ou • T.� � Gtz��--r�s +-� ��.� . - 5-Ptz�.�� . ��.p � -� ��.s� �lz f ' C O u,S �-�21.,[ C�-1 b�.! ��. �= '�DTZG� � Sv � �[ 77 O� - , � �_�►.c.�0� vV1 G �-.�.T i� v�-� ��.i L.In�.v�-, � (.-�-{ = - .__. '�-� - � ��2�-�.-1, l�o�l � �, � � L( . � ��. �l� �l - o - . _- �r.r.�..�.�. .�,,,�.�. �(03/25/2010) George Ruther - Rockfall mitigation meeting confirmation -Timber Ridge� Page 1! �,. From: Rick Pylman <rick@pylman.com> To: Steve Pawlak <steve@hpgeotech.com>, Glenn Palmer <palmer@alpinecivil.com Date: 3/25/2010 10:38 AM Subject: Rockfall mitigation meeting confirmation -Timber Ridge Gentlemen: We will meet at 1:30 Tuesday March 30 at the Town of Vail Community Development office. As I said earlier. I think some of the details we need to discuss include: height of fence vs. distance from pavement edge, use of berming under/adjacent to fence, design elements such as curves or angles to break the "straight line" appearance, landscape integration for screening/visual aesthetic purposes, pedestrian breaks for building fire exiting (overlap design?) and a snow removal access gate for a front end loader, fence platform width requirements, grading and retaining wall issues. With some direction on these issues hopefully we can proceed to a final design fairly quickly. Thanks for the quick response on the meeting request. Rick Pylman Pylman & Associates, Inc. www.pylman.com 970-926-6065 �L I Tues � \ ► � � � �m r � e e a es ano er s e orwar 4-3 decision sends project to Vail towr� council By Randy Wyrick Mountaineer Staff Writer Vail's Timber Ridge developers took another step forward yesterday when the town's planning commis- sion gave the plan two thumbs up. OK, a thumb and a half. On a 4-3 vote, Vail's Planning and Environmental Commission approved the Timber Ridge development plan. The town council is sort of like � major league baseball team, and if they want to take a look at the project, they'll call it up. Maybe next month, Vail of- ficials said. "We will work to continue to refine the design," s.aid Rick Pylman, a local planner who's part of the develop- ment team. "The approval allows us to stay on schedule to begin construction as soon this summer as possible, and deliver units in November 20ll :' Even with the approvals, some PEC members had con- tinued reservations regarding the project's size and scope. "I didn't think I'd ever be in a position when I'd vote against employee housing," said Sarah Palamo, PEC member. It'll be the volume of the Ritz Carlton Bachelor Gulch, said Bill Pierce, who voted against it, saying it was too dense. The tail of the Timber Ridge tape Right now, Timber Ridge is 198 apartments on 10 acres. Each apartment is 745 square feet. The whole thing was built in 1981. The 5.2 acres on Timber Ridge's eastern end are to be demolished and developed, possibly beginning this summer. The plan is for units to open in November 2011. On those 5.2 acres, the developers will build 352 apartments in three buildings, between three and five stories high. That's 570' workforce housing beds. It'll have 522 parking spaces in a five-story parking structure, and a 4,689 square foot residents clubhouse. Timber Ridge has just over 300 parking spaces now. It'll be somewhere in the neighborhood of 100 feet tall. The highest part of the Solaris, the tower, is 99 feet. The buildings and parking garage in the plan now will cover 94,100 square feet, 41 percent of those 5.24 acres. Under Vail's current regulations, a project can cover up to 55 percent of the land on which it's built. Vail bought it for $20 million in July 2003. The town started down redevelopment road in 2005. After a swing and a miss with a couple other devel- opers, they connected with Vail Timber Ridge LLC. It's based in El Paso, Texas, but like Pylman, most of the people working the project are local. The group has built more than 70,000 aparhnents for colleges and military family housing. Developer's deal As part of the deal, Vail gets $11 million up front from the development company, even before a shovel of dirt is turned. The town retains ownership of the land. The developer is responsible for leasing enough apartments to make it cash flow. "The developer has done a market study and the de- mand is there," Pylman said. They'll have to do it without Vail Resorts. 1'he ski company has master leased much of Timber Ridge. But Vail Resorts is building First Cliair, beginning next month, and isn't part of the Timber Ridge equa- tion, at least for now. The ski company is scheduled to break ground on what it's calling an employee housing project around the middle of next month. If it doesn't, the town can collect a$12 million per-,.. formance bond, for VR failing to perform. - Jobs and jotrfillers During the ski season, the town of Vail is home to 9,000 jobs, or 6,000 employees, said George Ruther, Vail's community development director. Vail wants 30 percent of the people who work in Vail to live in Vail, ar 1,800 people. "The goal is to provide deed restricted beds for 1,800 employees," said Nina Timm, Vail's housing director. Even after Timber Ridge's eastern end is redeveloped, the town will still be 160 beds short, Ruther said. "There are those people who see employee housing as a big problem," Ruther said. "With big problems come big solutions, and a large part of that solution is redevelopment of Timber Ridge." "I think there are people being lulled into thinking we don't have an employee housing [problem] because of the economy," said Vail's Kaye Ferry. "Some say it's too big, that discussion was taken away from us when they issued the RFP, outlining the numbet of beds it should have." VaiPs Jim Lamont disagreed. ' "It's a question of asking the private sector to meet criteria that the public sector does not," Lamont said. "We cannot continue to warehouse our most valuable asset, those who come here to work so we can retain our lifestyle." . � n � ... °�� ° � ��`' ";, � r � � �°� � . ��, � � � � r � a� � ��'�a �y �. �� .. > � , . �:�, �� °�� "� � _ � �„�� s" . �� ' ` � .� � � . . . . . « . . °5 . Department of Community Development' 75 South Frontage Road � � Va,il, C�lorac�o 81��7�� _ :�TTeI: � 970-479-212$r°, �. �� ``Fa�c.97Q-479-24�� ::�� :� �� . , � ° �� iVeb: www.uai(gov co� e�e�opment Review:�p�rd�n,�tt��3�� .�� ffl , _ ° � �c°° r,.�,a..w .�d�� Variance Request Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commission General Information: Variances may be granted in order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and un- necessary physical hardships as would result from the strict interpretation and/or enforcement of the zoning regulations inconsistent with the development objectives of the Town of Vail. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate viciniry; or from other physical limitations, street locations or con- ditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. The Vail Town Code can be found on the Town's website at www.vailgov.com The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Re- view Board and/or Town Council. Fee: $500 Description of the Request: A request for the review of a variance from Section 14-5-1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure design Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a cross-over aisle width of less than 30 feet in width within the required parking structure. Physical Address: 1280 North Frontage Road Parcel Number: 210312105008 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation Atten: George Ruther Mailing Address: 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 Phone: 970 376 2675 Owner's Signature: 1 J. Kc�� j"✓ "t �+ T T— Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: George Ruther Mailing Address: Same E-Mail: 9ruther@vailgov, com Phone: Same Fax: 970 479-2452 �'{ A� ,�(�� .J �" r%%/a d � For Office Use Only: Cash CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: Received From: Meeting Date: D 1 PEC No.: � Planner: _��„ Project No; ��% " �/� Zoning: � Land Use: Location of the Proposal; Lot:��"� B ocTc�� Subdivision: �.�'Ovl�( .d a�.. f j�i✓�c ( �`�vo��o�o� O1-Jan-10 . , � � . �� .,. �°� � � �� ' f� , � Department of Communi#y Development°�� k '° g.- . � � �� . � .� � �� , 7 South Frontage Road � a � `° . �: •. �` �'�� , �'x, �� , �� Va41,.Calorado � 8165'7� �� q��`�� °� .��' , _ ,� � � ., � � � ,�,� � .QTel�: . 970-479 2 ��; � R. , �� : . �� .�� .- � 'Fa�C�: 970-479 24��' �� , � � ;';� � -�, � s?�»z � e _ �. �� ,_� �� , � eb. www.vai gov cv � �� Qe�elopment Review Coardinat�► ; � � , _ _. ��,�� ! � � � ° ' , ��~ �� ..� �� ,E� �;, � �� t, � �. ' � �� , �� Development Plan Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commission General Information: This application is required for the establishment or the amendment to an approved develop- ment plan. The establishment or an amendment of a development plan may be required for new construction, change in use or redevelopment on parcels that are within the following Zoning Districts or as determined by the Administrator: General Use (GU) District (Section 12-9C, Vail Town Code), Ski Base/ Recreation (SBR) District (Section 12-8D, Vail Town Code) and Ski Base/ Recreation 2(SBR2) District (Section 12-8E, Vail Town Code). Sections of the Vail Town Code may be found on the Town website at www.vailgov.com. The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Review Board and/or the Town Council. Fee: _$1500—Establishment of a development plan _$250—Amendment to an approved development plan Description of the Request: A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the required landscape plan and geologic hazard mitigation plan for the redevelopment of Timber Ridge Village Apartments Physical Address: 1280 North Frontage Road Parcel Number: 210312105008 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation Atten: George Ruther Mailing Address: �5 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 Phone: 970 479-2145 Owner's Signature: / ��c.t,al`�h�ai/ 1_�� Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: George Ruther Mailing Address: Same Same E-Mail: 9ruther@vailgov.com Phone: Same Fax: 970 479-2452 ��C�S l��` '�'1�,4�. For O�ce Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: �i Received From: Meeting Date: � 1 �/0 PEC No.: pE�-I O C7G p[ Planner: 1..�! � Project No: ��.-<.1� � �(O �7 � Zoning: �Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot:�� Block:� Subdivision:� ,i Gvl S rP�. '�► �� U�— ona g 01-Jan-10 4 � �� OF VAI� ' Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Yail, CO 81657 970-479-2158 Fax: 970-479-2166 www. vailgov. com MEMO To: George Ruther, Director of Community Development From: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer Re: PEC Review of Timber Ridge Redevelopment Date: 3/16/10 The Town of Vail Public Works Department received the revised PEC Timber Ridge Redevelopment plans and response letter on 3/11/10. Based on these revised plans and responses, the following list of issues shall be conditions of approval. Each of these issues shall be resolved by the Developer. The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit or as further noted within. Conditions of Anproval: Transit Area; a. Show a pedestrian connection along the north side of the transit loop (w/ stairs as needed) to a crosswalk across the west drive entrance to south of the club entrance_ 2. West Entrance Area/Parlang; a. The drive lane shall be shifted south after the curve as it enters the east existing housing to maintain the existing parking on the north side of the drive aisle b. Relocate the ADA parking as discussed on 3/15/10. No parking shall occur within the Transit Area and Transit intersections. 3. Fire Lane/Ped Path Areas; a. The Fire lane/ped path connection to the entrance drive shall feel pedestrianized, yet accommodate cmergency vehicles and maintenance vehicles. The fire lane shall be modified as per the discussion on 3/15/10 and the conceptual sketch as provided on 3/17/10. Final approval may require additional changes when a more detail plan is provided. 4. Engineered analysis on tne existing condition of the gabion walls to remain will be required, details on how to conncct to existing gabion walls and how to build walls beneath the existing gabion walls will be required, as well as construction shoring plans showing no impact to the adj acent properties. 5. Frontage Road; Attachment: E a. A CDOT access permit approval will be required prior to approval. b. Full CDOT frontage Rd design plans will be required as a part of this project c. A full width overlay will be required as a part of this proj ect for the limits of the Frontage Rd improvements. d. Tapers and Decel lengths shall match Traffic study recommendations. e. Frontage Rd. shoulder widening shall occur to the south to the extent possible. 6. A bus stop shall be designed and constructed on Lions Ridge Loop in a location determined by the Town. 7. Drainage; a. Provide a Drainage Report for review and approval. 8. A preliminary lighting plan layout has been provided show lighting type, fixtures, power source, dimension spacing. The lighting shall match the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. 9. Building; a. The Environmental report indicates that the population of this new development will be �552-570 individuals housed in 352 units as compared to �424 in 106 individuals housed in 106 units today. The existing calculation is based on 106 2 bedroom units with 4 persons per unit. What is the developed population based on? The current 352 unit count contains 544 bedrooms, at 2 persons per bedroom, the resulting population would be 1088 individuals. Please provide a substantiated clearer analysis of anticipated housed people on site. b. Show typical dimensions for parking spaces/drive lanes etc... These will have to meet Town code. All exposed surface spaces are 9x19 and garaged/covered are 9x18. Cross-over aisles shall be 30' unless a variance is approved. c. Show snow storage areas for the top deck of the parking structure. d. The proposed short-term parking spaces on the first floor of the garage shall be managed and signed as such. 10. Traffic Study; a. The Traffic study will need to be updated, once the final program in the development is determined. b. Note on the Traffic Generation Summary that the 171 units is based on occupancy not capacity. c. The t�-affic engineer will need to include in the traffic report a section on the adequacy of the short-term parking spaces. 11. The development will require a public art component. 12. Please add Utility Signature block and have all utilities providers sign aclrnowledging their acceptance of the utility design. 13. A CDOT access permit shall be approved prior to Civil Plan and Building Permit submittal, and a CDOT Notice to Proceed set of plans shall be approved prior to approval of Building Permit. 14. A CDPHE Permit and all applicable ACOE permits (i.e. Dewatering) shall be submitted prior to construction. 15. If temporary and/or permanent dewatering is anticipated during construction, a dewatering soils analysis will be required by a qualified licensed engineer analyzing the impact to adjacent properties(i.e. settlement) 16. Provide full civil construction drawings complying to Town of Vail standards prior to building permit submittal. I�e�i�n ��i��+v Bc�ar�! A�TI��1 F�?RM �;�„ '!� t i?�partm�r�t c�f Corr��nun�ty D�v�lop€rie�t ��j�� T� ' 75 Sc��th F�ont�c�� Raad, '�fa�l� �c�€c��ad�r 81657 �,f t:�€: 97f�.479.213� fax: '97�,�74.2�� :�•.�.,��€�7 � �,.��_��,a�- � vr�b: �rr�v�r.vailgar�,c€��t Project Name: TINFBER RIDGE AMENDMENT DRB Number: DRB110565 Project Description: AMENDMENT TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Participants: OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/14/2011 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/14/2011 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL �1BER RIDGE APARTMENTS l �J Location: Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: See conditions Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: Planner: George Ruther BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: WITHDRWN Date of Approval: DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 TOWN OF VAIL � �'��!��!�\��i� ( �r � �� NOV 14 ��i1 � �'�_.i .l� v Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator �_...._......_.�_�a_^. _..__ . Application for Design Review Changes to Approved Plans General Information: This application is for all changes to approved plans prior to Certificate of Occupancy. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Commu- nity development Department. Design Review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction commences. Submittal Requirements: 1. Three (3) copies of all pertinent approved plans with illustrated, labeled changes 2. Joint Property Owner Written Approval Letter, if applicable. Fee: $20 Single Family Duplex ✓ Multi-Family Description of the Request: Amendment to Timber Ridge approved plans Please see attached information for more detail Commercial hysical Address: 1280 North frontage Road Parcel Number: 210312105008 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: Timber Ridge Affordable Housing Corporation Mailing Address: 75 South Frontage Road, Vail CO 81657 Phone: 9�0-479-2144 Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Representative: Vail Timber Ridge LLC Mailing Address: 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive EI Paso, TX 79912 Phone: 915-877-3333 E-Mail: Todd fereday - TFereday@cfjordan. Fax: 915-877-3999 For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Exp. Date Fee Paid: �A�v6�n Meeting Date: Planner: �ning: Location of the Proposal: Lot: /- cJ Block: C 0 Auth # Check # Received From: DRB No.: �_l D� �nS � � Project No: Q�S � i- O�D.� � �� Land Use: �� Subdivision: 1-\OiJ��r� F.l41�(C� � ,� `..a � � � ,� C>:hi4'.iJHITY� C�kELU'`�•#.tE.ie.- Rt�nn�ng �n�l En�rir+�nmenta! Corr�missan ACTI��V F+t�RM Depar�tment a� Cammunity �?evelapment 75 Sr��th Franta4e Raad, Vail� Coforado $1657 te1:970.4i9.2139 fax:970.479.2452 aueb: www.vaitgav.cam Project Name: PEC MAJOR SUBDIVISION Project Description: Participants: PEC Number: PEC110060 RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1-5, BLOCK C, LIONS RIDGE FILING 1 INTO TWO LOTS. THIS PROJECT WAS WITHDRAWN ON DECEMBER 15, 2011 AFTER APPROVAL. OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/23/2011 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAI L CO 81657 APPLICANT VAIL TIMBER RIDGE LLC C/0 LEE THOMAS 9639 GREENVILLE AVE DALLAS TX 75243 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL 11/23/Z011 Phone: 214-349-7900 Location: TIMBER RIDGE Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: See conditions Motion By: Kurz Second By: Cartin Vote: 7-0-0 Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 12/12/2011 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:300 (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: CON0012355 Any approvals granted by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) shall only be effective upon the approval date of each of the two amendment application requests. Should one of the development applications be denied or fail to be approved, then none of the applications are approved and the proposal is denied in its entirety. Cond: CON0012356 The Developer shall submit a detailed snow removal management and operations plan pursuant to Section 12-10-5, Construction and Maintenance, Vail Town Code, specifically describing how snow will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012357 The Developer shall submit a detailed waste removal management and operations plan specifically describing how waste and recycling will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012358 The Developer shall submit an executed deed restriction for Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision, approved by the Town of Vail, demonstrating compliance with Chapter 12-6I, Housing District, and Chapter 12-13, Employee Housing, Zoning Regulations of the Town Vail, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. The deed restriction shall be noted on the Final Plat prior to recording the Final Plat with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office. The deed restriction shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy on Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. Cond: CON0012359 The Developer shall submit a construction staging plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval which addresses such matters as materials staging, construction parking plan, construction and occupancy phasing, temporary access, construction schedule, temporary utilities, trafFic control, emergency access, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012360 The Developer shall record a revocable right of way permit for any and all private property improvements located with the Town of Vail right of way. Said permit shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's OfFice prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012361 The Developer shall submit a Shoring and Excavation Plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, which addresses such matters as excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans, detailed profiles and cross-sections, existing utilities, materials storage, permanent and temporary easements, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012362 The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with the list of issues identified in the memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Public Works, dated November 30, 2011 and attached for reference (Attachment E). Said plans shall be submitted for review and approval and fully comply with all applicable regulations of the Town of Vail, in conjunction with the submittal of a building permit. Planner: George Ruther 0 PEC Fee Paid: $0.00 � . _ r,��;�-��r �_ ��r��.,,��t- Pt�nn�rtg ancf En�r�xc�nrnen�� +��rr�mis�t�n A�C�IC�� C3R�+�1 i��pa�t��nt of Coanmr�nity �?��laprr��r�t. 75 St��th �r�ania�� tt�aad, °JaFla Co€o��do 816�7 t�(: '97Q.�l79.213'� fax; 97i1,�#79.Z45� v�eb: wwvr.+�aifg�v,c�rrt Project Name: TIMBER RIDGE AMENDMENT Project Description: Participants: PEC Number: PEC110059 AMENDMENT TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A REDUCTION IN THE CROSSOVER DRIVE AISLE WIDTH. THIS PROJECT WAS WITHDRAWN ON DECEMBER 15, 2011 AFfER APPROVAL. OWNER TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/14/2011 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT TIMBER RIDGE AFFORDABLE HOUS 11/14/2011 IN CARE OF NAME FINANCE DIRECTOR 75 S FRONTAGE RD W VAIL CO 81657 Project Address: 1280 N FRONTAGE RD W VAIL Location: TIMBER RIDGE APARTMENTS Legal Description: Lot: C-1, Block: A TO Subdivision: LION'S RIDGE FIL. 1 Parcel Number: 2103-121-0500-8 Comments: See conditions Motion By: Kurz Second By: Cartin Vote: 7-0-0 Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 12/12/2011 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:300 (PLAN): PEC approval shail not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: CON0012347 Any approvals granted by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) shall only be effective upon the approval date of each of the two amendment application requests. Should one of the development applications be denied or fail to be approved, then none of the applications are approved and the proposal is denied in its entirety. Cond: CON0012348 The Developer shall submit a detailed snow removal management and operations plan pursuant to Section 12-10-5, Construction and Maintenance, Vail Town Code, specifically describing how snow will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012349 The Developer shall submit a detailed waste removal management and operations plan specifically describing how waste and recycling will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012350 The Developer shall submit an executed deed restriction for Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision, approved by the Town of Vail, demonstrating compliance with Chapter 12-6I, Housing District, and Chapter 12-13, Employee Housing, Zoning Regulations of the Town Vail, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. The deed restriction shall be noted on the Final Plat prior to recording the Final Plat with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office. The deed restriction shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy on Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. Cond: CON0012351 The Developer shall submit a construction staging plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval which addresses such matters as materials staging, construction parking plan, construction and occupancy phasing, temporary access, construction schedule, temporary utilities, traffic control, emergency access, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012352 The Developer shall record a revocable right of way permit for any and all private property improvements located with the Town of Vail right of way. Said permit shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012353 The Developer shall submit a Shoring and Excavation Plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, which addresses such matters as excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans, detailed profiles and cross-sections, existing utilities, materials storage, permanent and temporary easements, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. Cond: CON0012354 The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with the list of issues identified in the memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Public Works, dated November 30, 2011 and attached for reference (Attachment E). Said plans shall be submitted for review and approval and fully comply with all applicable regulations of the Town of Vail, in conjunction with the submittal of a building permit. PLacu3er: George Ruther PEC Fee Paid: $250.00 � �� =..a C�..�r��•��.rs K�-,t R,'Z � 5�: C�.ttZN1�u Zu� � �� (�uuZ. , � 2 0 -� _ � „�, -- �� . - -- ---��---Cu�z --�- -- --- rz �(-�- -- Ku2z. ��' �t�m�r�naum Cua.r�`a.Zu� .� _� TO: Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission FROM DATE Community Development Department December 12, 2011 SUBJECT: A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61-11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of an approximate 5.24 acre portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 279 new deed-restricted employee , housing units; a request for the review of a variance, from Section 14-5-1, � Minimum Standards, "Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design Standards for All t0 �lJses, Vail Town.Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, '� to allow for � crossaver drive aisle width of less than thirty-feet (30') within the �b required,parking, structure, and request for final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re-subdivision of the Timber Ridge site, located at 1280 North Frontage Road West/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110059 and PEC110060) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation Planner: George Ruther SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Timber Ridge, LLC and the Town of Vail Municipal Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman, of Pyfman & Associates, are requesting a review of amendments to an Approved Development Plan for the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. The proposal would remove nine existing apartment buildings containing 102 apartment units and replace them with three new, attached apartment buildings containing 279 deed restricted housing units, in four-story tall buildings, 424 space parking garage and a resident's clubhouse According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, Lots C1 - 5 of the Lions Ridge Subdivision are zoned Housing (H) District. As such, all future development on the site shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Housing District development standards and processes. A complete zoning analysis for the project is outlined in Section V of this memorandum. Based upon staff's analysis of the criteria for review of the proposed project, as outlined in Sections VII - IX of this memorandum, staff is recommending that the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission: � • �}�proves, wi�th conditions, and modifications, the applicant's request to amend an Approved Development Plan for the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments site, • Approves, with conditions; and modifications, the applicant's request for a crossover drive aisle width reduction from 30 feet to 26 feet 10 inches, and � Forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, and modificati�ns, the applicant's request for a final plat to allow for a re- subdivision of the Timber Ridge site, located at 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS On November 14, 2011, the applicant submitted a development review application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for amendments to their Approved Development Plan. The PEC approved the current Development Plan at the March 22, 2010 hearing. Below is a summary of the proposed amendments to the Approved Development Plan. Summarv of the Proposed Amendments J�i� y��, ��ti` �� December 12, 2011 March 22, 2010 ` . Proposed Amendment Approved Plan 3`� `�j�, % Chanc7e 279 Units 359 Units 22% Reduction 431''�`� "'� "�'��"'� �'""° � 544`'Bedrooms , � {n � ,-� ,�,�_.18%o Reduction ,Beclr�ooms �' r,_�ri.;;°;._y� �,y �...y _. ,� �_._.._._ .. _. �� _ �.�. . 602 — 737 Employees Housed 760 — 930 Employees Housed 20% Reduction s17 `Studio Units s_��;,�,F �?`�..,�� 'r_ 22rStudio U,nits. _ _ �',.. �_.r_ �� .�23%�Retluctiori 110 One-Bedroom Units 138 One-Bedroom Units 20% Reduction 152 Two Bed�oom Units � 192:-Two Bedroo,'r�i Urnts �� ,�F� ,� 20/ Redu tion � � � - �,,,..,w�_�_�.��..,.�.�,.a�� .4-� .__ �.>�. �_ ..�:�a 1. Y.. ��. .., ._ ,�,.,_,. . . �... ,_. _v .- 199,693 Maximum GRFA 252,628 Maximum GRFA 21% Reduction � -,.� ,..,�,�--�-,� ; � t � -� �--, � 18 R .�-�, �424`�� arkin��Spaces,��_�� y ��;` �; �,� .520; P,arking,Spaces y��_ °�t $�.�_ �� _,�%_ eduction 68' Maximum Building Height 79' Maximum Building Height 14% Reduction 73 _Maxim,umx�Tower' Height` y„ ,� ,..,100' Maxi'iimum Tower Height �� k„r27%o.Reduction Amended Landscape Plan Landscape Plan Condition Proposed . .�...e.. , _,-, _... .. ,. _,. :...: __.,._ ._n.,.., ,; � _. __,,,, 68 736'sq ft.`�Landscape Area 68;736 sq. ft Landscape ^Area; `�._No Change The applicants are proposing to redevelop the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments development site and construct a new four-story tall building extending approximately 800 feet along the North Frontage Road (Attachment A— Town of Vail Page 2 Vicinity Map). The new building will contain up to 279 new employee housing units capable of housing between 602 - 737 employees. According to the amended development plan, the 279 units wiil be a mix of studio units (6% or 17), one bedroom units (39% or 110) and two bedroom units (55% or 152). The western half of the site (96 apartments) wili remain operational throughout the redevelopment construction process. A new four-level enclosed, parking garage wi►I be constructed on the site along with improved public transit facilities to meet the minimum parking and transportation needs of the residents of the development. A 7,911 square foot clubhouse will be constructed within the redevelopment. The clubhouse includes an exercise area, offices, a cyber cafe, a club room and business/conference room space. A written narrative from the applicants, entitled "Timber Ridqe Amendment to an Approved Development Plan Application", date stamped November 14, 2011, describing the amendment application requests is attached for reference (Attachment B). A reduced copy of the proposed plan is attached for reference (Attachment C). Proposed Eastern Portion Redevelopment Total Range of Average # of % of Square Feet Number of Number of Employees Empfoyees Units Unit Mix of Units Bedrooms Bedrooms / Unit Housed 17 6% 393 s. ft. Studio 17 1.15 - 1.35 19 - 23 530 - 650 110 39% sq. ft. One 110 1.5 - 2.0 165 - 220 786 - 931 152 55% s. ft. Two 304 2.75 - 3.25 418 - 494 279 100% 431 6oz - 737 * source - Vail Town Code and the Town of Vail Employee Housing Strategic Plan Crossover Drive Aisle Width Variance The applicants are requesting a reduction in the minimum required width for a crossover drive aisle width within the proposed parking structure. Section 14-5-1, Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code, requires a minimum of 30 feet of drive aisle width for two- way traffic flow within a parking structure. Crossover drive aisle width is the measurement used to ensure necessary distance for a vehicle to make a 90 deg�ee or greater turn to change drive aisles. Within the proposed parking structure the applicants are proposing to reduce the crossovEr drive aisle width to 26 feet 10 inches (3 feet 2 inch variance). A letter from Parking Consultants, LLC, dated April 19, 2010, detailing the request has been submitted for review (Attachment F). Final Plat The applicants are requesting review of a major subdivision application to create a new final plat of the Development Site. The purpose of the final plat is to facilitate redevelopment of the property by creating two new lots, the necessary easements and allow for the future transfer of ownership of the property. As proposed, Lots C1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1 would be resubdivided to create Lots 1& 2 of the new Timber Ridge Subdivision. Upon creation Lot 1 would be approximately 4.840 Town of Vail Page 3 acres (210, 830 sq. ft.) in size and Lot 2 would be approximately 5.242 acres (228,342 � sq. ft.) square feet in size. According to the land use summary noted on the proposed final plat, the total size of the major subdivision shall be approximately 10.0H2 acres. A reduced copy of the proposed final plat is attached for reference (Attachment D). II1. BACKGROUND The Town of Vail acquired Timber Ridge Village Apartments in 2003 for $20 million to preserve the deed restricted employee housing designation on the property. Constructed in 1981, Timber Ridge is Vail's largest deed-restricted employee housing complex, currently consisting of 198 rental apartment units on ten acres. Each of the existing units is 745 sq. ft. in size with two bedrooms and one bathroom. Presently, the eastern portion of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments provides housing to more than 306 persons (three occupants per unit X 102 units). Existing Timber Ridge Village Apartments Total Average Number Number Employees # of % of Square Feet of of Employees Housed Units Unit Mix of Units Bedrooms Bedrooms / Unit Toda 198 100% 745 sq. ft. 2 396 3.0 594 IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Town Code Article 12-61, Housinq (H) Zone District 92-6/-1: PURPOSE: The housing district is intended to provide adequate sites for employee housing whrch, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other residential zoning districts. lt is necessary in this district to provide development standards specifically prescribed for each development proposa! or project to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as conditional uses, which are intended to be incidental and secondary to the residential uses of the district. The housing district is intended to ensure that employee housing permitted in the district is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the allowed types of uses. 12-61-8: PARKING AND LOADING: Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. No parking or loading area shall be locafed within any required setback area. At the discretion of the planninq and environmental commission, variations to the parkinq standards out(ined in chapter 10 of this title may be approved durinq the review of a development plan sublect to a parkinq mana9ement plan. The parkinq manaqement plan shall be approved by the planninq and environmental commission and shall provide for a reduction in the parkinq requirements based on a demonstrated need for fewer parkinq spaces than chapter 10 of this title would repuire. For example a demonstrated need for a reduction in the required parkinq could include: Town of Vail Page 4 � A. Proximity or availabilitV of alternative modes of transportation includinq, but not limited to, public transit or shuttle services. B. A limitation placed in the deed restrictions limitinq the number of cars for each unit. C. A demonstrated permanent proqram includinq but not limited to, rideshare proqrams carshare proqrams shuttle service, or staqqered work shifts. 12-61-10: OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission; !n the H district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as proposed by the applicant, as prescribed by the planning and environmental commission, and as adopted on fhe approved development plan: 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2, Building height. 3. Density control (including gross residential floor area). Chapter 12-17, Variances 12-17-1: PURPOSE, VARIANCES: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physica! hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practica! difficu/ty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity,� or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or litera! compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. Chapter 145 Parkinq Lot and Parkinq Structure Desiqn Standards 14-2-9, DEFlN1TfONS CROSSOVER (SWITCHBACK OR 90 DEGREE TURN): The area on a driveway where the turning angle of the centerline of the driveway curvature is nin�ty degrees (90°) or greater. CROSSOVER AISLE: The drive ais/e where a ninety degree (90°) or greater turn is required by a vehicle to change drive aisles. 14-5-1: MINIMUM STANDARDS: This section (table 5) specifies the parking lot standards for a!1 uses excluding residential uses under three (3) units and including, but not limited to, commercial, retail, office, restaurant, institutional, hotel, accommodation, and multiple-family development. These standards are subject to all conditions and exceptions described herein. These standards shall be considered the minimum standards. When two (2) or more standards conflict the more restrictive standard shal! apply. Town of Vail Page 5 TABLE 5 PARKING LOT DESIGN STANDARDS , Angle Of Minimum Parking One-Way ; Space Drive Aisle ; Crossover � 17' � drive aisle V. ZONING ANALYSIS Address: Legal Description: Zoning: Land Use Plan Designation: Current Land Use: Lot Size: Geologically Sensitive Areas: Development Standard Min. Lot Area: Density Control Min. Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Max. Building Height: I ��!� : � Max. Site Coverage: Min. Landscape Area Min. Parking: Minimum Two-Way Drive Aisle 30' Minimum Parking Stall Slze And Clearance n/a 1280 North Frontage Road Lots C1-05, Lions Ridge Filing No. 1 Housing District Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Dwellings 5.24 acres/ 228,254 square feet High Severity Rockfall Required Proposed determined by PEC 228,254 sq.ft.(5.24 acres) determined by PEC 53.24 d.u./ac. (279 d.u.) 20' (north) 20' (east) 20' (west) 20' (south) determined by PEC determined by PEC 55% unless at least 75% of parking is covered and approved by the PEC 68,476 sq. ft. (30%) Per Chapter 10 (550 spaces), or a max. 25% reduction (413 spaces) approved by the PEC based upon the Parking Management Plan provided 25' (north) 20' (east) 50' (west) 54' (south) 73' (tower element) 68' (building) 199,693 sq. ft. 97,448 sq. ft. (43%) 68,736 sq. ft. (30%) 424 spaces min. Town of Vail Page 6 � ►r/J VII. SURROU�lDING LAtVD USES A�1D ZONING Current Land Use North: Residential South: Interstate 70 ROW East: Residential West: US Postal Service Zoninq Two-Family Primary/Secondary Not Zoned High Density Multiple Family Residential High Density Mu�tiple Family Residential CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, DEVELOPMENT PLAN Land Use Desiqnation Low Density Residential Not Designated High Density Residential High Density Residential The review criteria and findings for evaluation for the review and consideration of an amended development plan are prescribed in Section 12-61-13 of the Zoning Regulations. According to Section 12-61-13, the following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable desiqn criteria. A list of the applicable design criteria are outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. 12-61-13: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS/CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria. A. Building design with respec orientation is compatible surrounding neighborhood. Architecture t to architecture, character, scale, massing and with the site, adjacent properties and the The proposed redevelopment project is intended to be an assemblage of four new residential buildings wrapping three sides of a new above-grade parking garage. As designed, there are an East, West, Center and Parking Garage buildings. The four buildings are physically connected to one another in an east to west alignment extending approximately 800 feet along the length of the building envelope. The residential buildings will have sloping roof gable and hip roof forms with pitches of up to 7:12 and a mix of stone, stucco and cementitious wood siding on the exterior. Additional design accents such as wooden shutters, south facing exterior decks and balconies and exposed wood beams and structural bracing are included on the proposed buildings. The applicants were scheduled for a public hearing before the Town of Vail Design Review Board on Wednesday, December 7, 2011. The applicant will return to the Design Review Board on December 21, 2011 for a final review. StafF believes the architecture of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. Town of Vail Page 7 Character The buildings have been designed as an assemblage of three residential buildinys connected to one another. The east and west buildings are similar in design and form. These buildings are designed with double-loaded corridors for internal circulation and contain south facing exterior courtyards for access to the buildings and passive outdoor recreation. These two buildings have been designed to be up to four stories in height. The third, or "center", building utilizes a single-loaded corridor for internal access and is also four stories tall. The "center" building provides the front fa�ade intended to screen the view of the parking garage. As designed, the "center" building creates a townhouse appearance along the North Frontage Road. The final building is the wrapped parking garage. The parking garage contains the required off-street parking spaces for the development, a resident's storage area, and access to trash and recycling facilities. The parking garage is accessed directly from the North Frontage Road. The style of the residential buildings can be characterized as maintaining an alpine form of design. Sloping roof forms, hip and gable roof ends, steeply pitching tower elements and a mixture of stone, stucco and wood make up the exterior building materials. The color palette selected for the buildings is an assortment of light and dark earth-tone colors. Architectural elements such as wooden decks, exposed beam ends, decorative bracing and covered main entrances have been incorporated to accentuate the character of the buildings. Scale and Massinq The scale of the proposed buildings is large when compared in context with surrounding uses and structures. There is little doubt that the proposed building will be one of the larger buildings constructed in the Town of Vail. The applicants have attempted to mask the scale and mass of the building by providing vertical articulation to the roof line and building mass. For example, the easternmost portions of the building have been lowered in height to more directly relate to the existing scale and massing of the Savoy Villas Condominiums residential units on the neighboring property. Additionally, the visual scale and massing of the parking garage was reduced by filling in and flattening out the grades on the north side of the parking garage. This change in grading substantially reduces the long, extensive linear mass of the parking garage and buries nearly 100% of the parking garage below grade. Staff believes the scale and massing of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. Orientation The buildings are sited predominately on an east to west orientation and generally parallel with the North Frontage Road and Lions Ridge Loop. The orientation of the buildings is driven primarily by the shape and configuration of the platted development site. Four south facing e�erior courtyards have been proposed along the south edge of the buildings. The four courtyards are designed to provide useable outdoor passive recreation areas for the residents of the buildings. According to the sun/shade analysis, the courtyards will receive varying amounts of direct sunlight throughout the year. A four Town of Vail Page 8 story tall enclosed parking garage has been oriented in the center portion of the site and screened on three sides by the proposed residential buildings. The north side ofi the garage has been substantially buried below grade to screen the structure from the view of the public. Staff believes the orientation of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. Responsiveness to the site The buildings and improvements have been designed to be responsive to the site. Nearly all of the activity associated with the site occurs along the south-facing edge of the development site. Both pedestrian and vehicle access to the buildings is taken from the south side. The buildings have been located as far as practical to the south so as to minimize the amount of encroachment into the steeply sloping north hillside. To that end, however, the applicants are also seeking approval of a retaining wall height variance in order to facilitate development on the site. Responsiveness to the surroundinq neiqhborhood and uses Several revisions have been made to the original proposal in order to increase the responsiveness of the building and uses to the surrounding neighborhood. For instance, the mass of the easternmost portion of the buildings was reduced to better relate to the mass and orientation of the existing Savoy Villas Condominiums. In addition, the westernmost end of the building was redesigned to lower the finish floor elevation to more closely match that of the existing North Frontage Road and pedestrian path. As a result, a significant amount of retaining walls were eliminated and substantial numbers of pedestrian stairs were removed. One important opportunity for improving compatibility with adjacent uses was not pursued however. The proposed building continues to maintain an entrance/exit on the east end building. This entrance/exit, while convenient, has the potential to negatively impact the use and enjoyment of the residential property to the east. Given the high volume of traffic this entrance will likely see, it might be better suited for another location. If this entrance/exit were simply relocated to the other side of the hallway, the potential for any negative impacts would be significantly reduced and the resident's use of the courtyard likely enhanced. Responsiveness to the Community The Timber Ridge Village Apartments redevelopment is in direct response to an identified community need. Through the adoption of the Town of Vail Employee Housing Strategic Plan the need for employee housing was quantified and a goal for the community was set. In response to this need, the Town has actively pursued the redevelopment of the site. Given the central location of the site to the identified job cores, its proximity to public transit facilities and its ability to accommodate a significant amount af infill development, this redevelopment site is wetl-suited for a project of this scope and size. Town of Vail Page 9 C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by t�e public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and, when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. Functionality and Aes#hetics The landscape plan needs further revision and attention. A well-designed and implemented landscape plan has the opportunity to bring numerous improvements and enhancements to the overall project, both functionally and aesthetically. First, the sizes of trees should be increased to be more reflective of the scale and mass of the buildings. Four story tall buildings and a predominance of 6' — 8' tall spruce trees are not compatible. A greater variety of tree sizes should be incorporated to better integrate the buildings into the context of the neighborhood. A significant landscape screen is needed along Lions Ridge Loop to again mask the scale of the building and provide greater visual interest to both persons passing by the site as well as the residents living in the units on north side of the buildings. By and large, there is effectively no landscape on the north side of the building. Greater consideration should be given to the planting plan. In many areas native aspen trees are used in a very linear, street tree form which is foreign to their more natural appearance. Instead, a more random and organic planting plan should be pursued to ensure the development fits into the mountain environment that is Vail. Attention should be given to where trees and planting are placed to optimize their aesthetic and environmental value to the overall development. All of the trees proposed along the south side of the fire lane/pedestrian path should be relocated on the site to avoid conflicts with the buried water and sewer lines. The area is more conducive to shrubs, perennial beds and turf. As such, the area could also be better utilized for much needed snow storage areas. Special attention needs to be directed towards maintaining safe sight distance triangles at driveway entrances. The landscape plan has been amended to reflect the conditions of the August 4, 2010 Design Review Board approval. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system is designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. Safe, Efficient and Aesthetically Pleasinq Circulation System Timber Ridge Village Apartments are located along the North Frontage Road. The North Frontage Road provides direct vehicular and pedestrian access to the site. A secondary pedestrian access is available to the site from Lions Ridge Loop. A series of pedestrian sidewalks and a shared fire lane/pedestrian path provides pedestrian circulation on the site. Vehicles will access the site in two locations; one at the main entrance to the parking garage and a second entrance at the west end of the building nearest the public transit stop. An enhanced public transit stop is proposed to be constructed to accommodate the anticipated significant increase in bus ridership. The public transit � Town of Vail Page 10 stop is designed to accommodate up to four buses at any given time (two east bound/two west bound). Special consideration should be given to the impact that this development may have on the Town's ability to provide convenient and efficient public transit services. More than 100 riders have been witnessed waiting at the transit stop during peak periods of the day and year. It should be reasonably assumed that these types of number will continue or increase. I-70 imposes a significant barrier to pedestrian movements north/south across the valley. To date, the Town has studied opportunities for constructing a pedestrian bridge over I- 70 linking the development site to the south side of I-70. In studying the opportunities the Town has concluded that finding a location to land the south end of the bridge remains one of the greatest barriers to constructing the improvements as there is little to no area of public right of way. The improvements would have to be located on private property. Snow Storaqe Three levels of the parking garage are enclosed and protected from the weather. The top deck of the garage, however, is exposed to the elements. As such, snow will accumulate on the top during the winter months. As presently designed, no accommodations for snow storage or snow removal is provided. Staff recommends the applicants revise the proposed plans ensuring that adequate snow storage and snow removal is addressed. The current proposal does not comply with the Town's adopted regulations. � � Cross Over Drive Aisle Width 2,6• `D � Title 14, Development Standards, of the Vail Town Code, in p�tit, prescribe minimum design standards for parking garages. According to Title 14, fhe minimum width of a cross over aisle in a parking structure is thirty feet (30'). The purpose of this standard is to ensure adequate clearances for the flow and circulation of traffic. Inadequate flow and circulation area for traffic results in decreased levels of s ice and functionality. As presently designed, the parking garage has twenry-four foot f�4') wide cross over aisles. Staff recommends the applicants submit written documentation from a qualified traffic consultant documenting the difference in level of service and functionality between the designed aisle width and the minimum required width. This information will be used to evaluate whether the designed aisle width is acceptable. D. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. Environmental Impact Report An environmental impact report was prepared for the Timber Ridge redevelopment project in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail and submitted to the Town of Vaif Community Development Department for review and consideration. Chapter 5, Cumulative & Long-term Effects & Irreversible Environmental Changes, of the report entitled, "ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, 7own of Vail Page 11 Timber Ridqe Redevelopment ProiecY' dated January, 2010, prepared by Western Ecological Resaurces, Inc, of Boulder, Colorado, concludes the following: 5.1 Hydrology 5.1.1 Surface Water The proposed redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge would have no cumulative, long-term effect or irreversible environmental change on the surFace water hydrology of the project site. 5.1.2 Ground Water The proposed development would have a slight, cumulative long-term effect or irreversible environmental change on the ground water hydrology of the project site due to dewatering of building foundations via underdrains. 5.2 Atmosphere The slight increase in hydrocarbon pollutants generated by the development and associated vehicular traffic represents a cumulative and long term effect. However, Kimley-Horn's traffic analysis concludes that redevelopment of Timber Ridge would have an overall effect of reducing traffic within Vail because employees would reside closer to their workplace. The majority of residents in Timber Ridge utilize public transportation. 5.3 Geology 8� Hazards At the March 22, 2010, public hearing the applicant presented a report from HP Geotech discussing the long-term risks presented by the rockfall hazard and four conceptual mitigation methods which could be implemented. At the time of the March approval of the Timber Ridge Development Plan a condition was included requiring the applicant to return io the Commission subsequent to a feasibilify ana�ysis and preliminary cosf estimates were completed, and an option selected. The Commission would then evaluate the selected option for its compliance with the Vail Town Code. Since March 22, 2010, the Town has purchased the land upon which the rock fall hazard is located, above the Timber Ridge development site. The applicant is proposing to mitigate the identified rockfall hazards through the use of multiple strategies: • Dislodge and remove all rocks which are of a size that can be manipulated; • Anchor all rocks which are of a size which cannot be manipulated by drilling into the rocks and the slope and using steel cable and grout/epoxies to affix them in place; and • Place a steel net over larger areas of hazard which is anchored to the slope. 5.4 Soils Because this is a redevelopment project, it would not result in any new cumulative or long-term impacts to the native soil. As described in the Geotechnical Study completed by HP Geotech, the site is overlain by fill material from the initial development. 5.5 Vegetation Resources The proposed project would create only a negligible long-term change in the plant community as areas of ornamental vegetation are impacted and replaced with similar ornamental vegetation. 5.6 Wildlife Resources The proposed redevelopment would not have any significant long-term impacts or irreversible environmental changes on wildlife resources. The site is already a high- Town of Vail Page 12 density residential development, and there will be no change in land use or vegetation resources. 5.7 Noise Noise generated by the proposed development and associated vehicular traffic would create a slight cumulative and long-term environmental change, however given the proximity of the Interstate-70 corridor, this change will be negligible. 5.8 Visual Resources Redevelopment of the eastern portion of Timber Ridge would create an irreversible change on the visual resources of the area. However, this would be a positive impact because the aging buildings would be replaced with newer, updated buildings with an aesthetically pleasing architectural style that compliments other developments within the Town of Vail (Figure 11). 5.9 Land Use The proposed project would not result in changes to the land use as one high-density residential development will be replaced with a similar high-density residential development. 5.10 Circulation & Transportation Long-term traffic estimates included in Kimley-Horn's TrafFic Impact Study (2010) assume the entire Timber Ridge site is re-developed to include 700 units by 2025. Their analysis estimates the development would generate 77 new vehicle trips during the peak morning hour and 142 new vehicle trips during the peak afternoon hour of the peak winter ski season. Likewise there would be 337 new person trips during the peak morning hour and 424 new person trips during the peak afternoon hour on the public transportation system. Kimley-Horn reports that the full build-out may have a significant impact on the Town of Vail's public transit system and states that additional busses may be needed to accommodate this use. The Traffic Impact Study will need to be updated once the final development plan has been determined. 5.11 Population The redeveloped apartment buildings will support a larger population, an increase estimated between 8 and 143 employees. This represents a cumulative and permanent increase in the population of the Town. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other applicable plans. A component of the Vail Comprehensive Plan is the Employee Housing Strategic Plan that was adopted in September, 2008. The Plan outlines action steps for the Town to achieve its deed restricted employee housing goal: 'To ensure there is deed restricted housing for at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of Vail." Two objectives the Plan identifies is Vail's need to "keep up" with new deed restricted employee housing demand as it is created and the need to "catch up" with existing deed restricted employee housing deficiencies. The Town adopted Commercial Linkage and Inclusionary Zoning requirements for new development to ensure the amount of deed restricted employee housing keeps up with increasing employee demand. The Plan recognizes the Town has the unique obligation of catching up with existing deficiencies. Town of Vail Page 13 l�lll� 7he proposed redevelopment of the easternmost portion of Timber Ridge is the most significant opportunity the Town has to address existing deed restricted empioyee housing deficits. The following figures illustrate the challenge Vail faces in meeting its goal: Vail's Deed Restricted Housinq Gap Existing Jobs 9,100 30% of Vail's Employees EHUS 725 Units Existing Deed Restricted Gap New Employee Beds '/z Timber Ridge Redevelopment Chamonix Neighborhood 6,100 Employees 1,830 Employees (emp. = more than 1 job) -1,196 Beds (avg. 1.65 emps/unit) 634 Beds 292 New Beds on average 73 New Beds on averaqe Remaining Deed Restricted Gap To Achieve the Goal 269 New Deed Restricted Beds CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, VARINACE Before acting on a variance application, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested crossover drive aisle width variance: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff Response - The requested variance to reduce the crossover drive aisle width from 30 feet to 26 feet 10 inches will have no impact to existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The reduction in width by 3 feet 2 inches is internal to the proposed parking structure and will only affect those utilizing the structure. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Staff Response — In response to the request the Town of Vail Public Works Department required a letter from a parking specialist discussing the request and potential impacts which may result from a reduction in crossover drive aisle width. The applicant submitted a letter from Parking Consultants, LLC, dated April 19, 2010, which speaks to the Town's requirement and the industry standards. The Town of Vail's minimum requirement of 30' for a cross over aisle is designed to achieve a minimum Level of Service (LOS) of C. The letter from the parking consultant identifies that the proposed reduction to 26'10" maintains this LOS due to the expected conditions. The letter highlights two conditions that allow for the reduction; that the parking structure is Town of Vail Page 14 � expected to maintain a low volume of traffic and that only residents of the project will be utilizing the structure and will gain familiarity of the circulation. Per industry standard and per the basis of the Town requirement these two conditions allow for a reduction in cross over aisle width. The Town's minimum standard is established to provide the minimum acceptable width for the numerous differing parking structures within the Town. In many cases parking structures are used by visitors and short-term occupants with less familiarity with a particular parking structure. The Town of Vail Public Works Department believes that the proposed reduction will maintain the desired LOS and will not compromise the function of the parking structure for the intended users. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff Response — The proposed reduction in crossover drive aisle width will have no negative effect on the above listed elements as they are internal to the proposed structure. IX. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, FINAL PLAT Chapter 3, Major Subdivision, Title 13 Subdivision Regulations, of the Vail Town Code prescribes the review criteria for a request for a major subdivision. Pursuant to Section 13-3-6, Final Plat, Vail Town Code, the criteria for reviewing the final plat shall be as contained in Section 13-4-2 of the Subdivision Regulations. According to Section 13-4- 2C, Review and Action on Plat, "The Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the plat and associated materials and shall approve, approve with modifications or disapprove the plat within iwenty one (29) days of the first public hearing on the major subdivision or the major subdivision will be deemed approved. A longer time period for rendering a decision may be granted subject to mutual agreement between the Planning and Environmental Commission and subdivider" The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to demonstrate that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of this Chapter, the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations made by public agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-3C above. The purpose of the final plat is to facilitate redevelopment of the site by creating two new lots and the necessary easements and allow for the future transfer of ownership of the property. As proposed, Lots C1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1 would be resubdivided to create Lots 1& 2 of the new Timber Ridge Subdivision. Upon creation Lot 1 would be approximately 4.840 acres (210,830 sq. ft.) in size and Lot 2 woufd be approximately 5.242 acres (228,342 sq. ft.) square feet in size. A reduced copy of the proposed final plat has been attached for reference (Attachment D). Town of Vail Page 15 According to Section 13-3-4, Commission Review of Application; Criteria, Vail Town Code, "The burden of proof shal! rest with tfie applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of the Chapter, Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems applicable. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations made by public agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-3C above. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the application and consider its appropriateness in regard to Town policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, environmental integrrty and compatibility with surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, effects on the aesthetics of the Town." One of the basic premises of subdivision regulations is that minimum standards for the creation of a new lot must be met. This project will be reviewed under the Major Subdivision Criteria, pursuant to Section 13-3-4, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code. 1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistenf with all the applicable elements of the adopted goa/s, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and Staff Response - The Vail Land Use Plan identifies the property proposed for subdivision with this application as High Density Residential and states, in part, the following: "The housing in this category would typically consist of multi-floored structures with densities exceeding 15 dwelling units per buildable acre." Further, the site was acquired by the Town of Vail in 2003 with the expressed purpose of preserving deed-restricted employee housing within the Town of Vail. The sole purpose of this subdivision request is to facilitate the redevelopment of a portion of the site for future deed restricted employee housing. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 2. The e�ent fo which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this title, as well as, but not /imited to, title 12, "Zoning Regulations'; of this code, and other pertinent regulations that the planning and environmental commission deems applicable; and Staff Response - The land included in this major subdivision proposal is zoned Housing District. The purpose of the Housing District is: "The housing district is intended to provide adequate sites for employee housing which, because of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately regulated by the development standards Town of Vail Page 16 prescribed for other residential zoning districts. It is necessary ir� this district fo provide development standards specifically prescribed for each development proposal or project to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 of this title and to provide for the publrc welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as condrtional uses, which are intended to be incidental and secondary to the residential uses of the district. The housing district is intended to ensure that employee housing permitted in the district is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the allowed types of uses." Further, the proposed final plat has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable provisions of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations. Upon review, it has been determined that the proposed plat, with minor administrative corrections, complies with the requirements of the Vail Town Code. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion 3. The extent to which the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient, workable relafionship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives; and Staff Response — The expressed purpose of the major subdivision application is to facilitate the redevelopment of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. Once subdivided, the easternmost 5.24 acres of the development site shall be redeveloped in keeping with the municipal developrnent objectives of providing deed-restricted employee housing within the Town of Vail. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding area; and Staff Response — As the proposed subdivision is in compliance with the applicable provisions of Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, future development in the areas surrounding the Timber Ridge Village Apartments will have little, if any, negative effects. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed io avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or resu/t in a"leapfrog" pattern of development; and Staff Response — The proposed subdivision is a resubdivision of five existing platted lots. As such, no extension to public utilities is required. While extensions are not required, upgrades and expansion of the existing services are required. Pursuant to the proposed development plan, the applicants are required to obtain roughly $90,000 worth of additional water rights for the property. The applicants are currently working with Town of Vail Page 17 representatives from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (the "District") to execute a written agreement guaranteeing the District's ability to serve the Development Site. All other public utility companies have provided written sign-offs to the Town of Vail verifying their ability to serve the Development Site. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve fhe planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade undersized lines; and Staff Response — All of the public utility providers supplying services to the subdivision and the Development Site were consulted and signed ofF on the ability to serve the Development Site. Final confirmation from the District is pending. Residential and fire flow calculations were analyzed and the appropriate upgrades to the water supply system have been identified on the proposed development plans. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 7. The extent to which fhe proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an orderly viable community and serves the best interests of the community as a whole; and Staff Response — Timber Ridge Village Apartments were acquired by the Town of Vail for the expressed purpose maintaining deed restricted employee housing. To that end, the development site was recently rezoned to the Housing District. The sole purpose of the Housing District is to provide development standards to facilitate the development of deed restricted employee housing. The proposed major subdivision application is intended to facilitate the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. If approved, the future redevelopment provides deed-restricted housing for up to 737 employees. Pursuant to the Town of Vail Emplovee Housinq Strateqic Plan, "The Town of Vail (community) recognizes the need for housing as infrastructure the promotes community, reduces transit needs and keeps more employees living in town and will provide enough deed-restricted housing for at least 30% of the workforce through policies, regulations, and pub/icly initiated development." Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water quality, air qualify, noise, vegetafion, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features; and Staff Response - The proposed major subdivision will have minimal, if any, adverse impacts on the natural environment. This area has already been legally platted and subsequently developed. If approved, the subdivision merely re-subdivides five existing lots into two new lots. Town of Vail Page 18 X. Staff believes the proposed major subdivision is in compliance with this criterion. 9. Such other factors and criteria as the commission and/or council deem applicable to fhe proposed subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Development Plan The Community Development Department recommends the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commissibn, approves with conditions and modifications, the applicants' request to amend the approved Development Plan, pursuant to section 12-61- 11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, allowing for the redevelopment of an approximate 5.24 acre portion of Timber Ridge Village Apartments, with up to 279 new deed-restricted employee housing units. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria and findings outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented before the Commission. Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve with conditions, and modifications, the amended development plan, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings, Town of Vail 1. "Proposed building set6acks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. 2. Proposed building setbacks provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. 3. Proposed building setbacks provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. 4. Proposed building setbacks result in creafive design solutions or ofher public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. 5. Building design with respect to architecture, character, sca/e, massing and orientation is compatible with fhe site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. 6. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functiona( development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. 7. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance fhe natura! features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. Page 19 8. A pedest�ian and vehicular circulation system is designed to provide safe, efficient and aestheiically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. 9. Environmental impacts resultrng from the proposal have been identified in the project's environrrzental impact report, if not waived, and al! necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. 90. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and oth� ical�(e plans." Variance �� `O � � The Community Development Department recommends t e Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission approves the request for th review of a variance, from Section 14-5-1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Cha 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a crossover drive aisle width of les n thirty-feet (30') within the required parking structure, located 1280 North Frontage Road/Lots 1-5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1. Staff's recommendation is based upon the response to the review criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum. Further, staff recommends the approval of the Final Plat carries with it the conditions of approval described in Section X of this memorandum. Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve with conditions and modifications, the variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings, "Upon review of the request for a variance to the crossover drive aisle width, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of specia! privilege inconsisfent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Housing District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistenf with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vai! Town Code. b. There are exceptrons or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that does not apply generally to other properties in the Housing District. Town of Vail Page 20 c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the ap,olicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Housing Drstrict. " Final Plat The Community Development Department recommends the Town of Vail P�anning and � Environmental Commission forwards a recommend of approval with conditions and modifications of the applicants' request of a major subdivision creating Lots 1& 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. Staff's recommendation of approval is based upon the review of the criteria and findings outlined in section IX of this memorandurra. and the evidence and testimony presented before the Commission. Further, staff recornmends the approval of the Final Plat carries with it the conditions of approval described in Section X of this memorandum. Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommend of approval with conditions and modifications of the major subdivision request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings, "Upon review of the request for a major subdivision creating Lots 1& 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goa/s, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town. 2. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas. 3. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. " Conditions Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve with conditions and modifications, the amended development plan the Community Development Department recommends the Commission includes the following conditions, For purposes of the following conditions of approval, the term "Developer" shall mean Vail Timber Ridge, LLC or its successors, the term "Town" shall mean Town of Vail and the term "ProjecY' shall mean the development plan for the redevelopment of the easternmost portion of Timber Ridge Village Apartments. � s�„ 1. Any approvals granted by the Town of Vail Planning & Environment Commission (PEC) shall only be effective upon the approval date of each of the�b �n# application requests. Should one of the development applications be denied or fail Town of Vail Page 21 V 2 .`L� �/ ' � ��3 � to be approved, then none of the applications are approved and the proposal is denied in its entirety. The Developer shall submit a revised set of drawings to the Town of Vail unity Development Department for review and approval depic�tin --� ockfall mitigation fence along the south side of Lions Ridge Loop w� �� property boundaries of Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. The mitiga � nce shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the regul � rescribed in Chapter 12-21, Hazard Regulations, of the Town of V� ing Regulations. The revised set of drawings must fully comply ' e applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of uilding permit for the Project. 3. The Developer shali submit a detailed waste removal management and operations plan specifically describing how waste and recycling will be accommodated and managed on the site. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 4. The Developer shall submit an executed deed restriction for Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision, approved by the Town of Vail, demonstrating compliance with Chapter 12-61, Housing District, and Chapter 12-13, Employee Housing, Zoning Regulations of the Town Vail, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. The deed restriction shall be noted on the Final Plat prior to recording the Final Plat with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office. The deed restriction shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy on Lot 2, Timber Ridge Subdivision. 5. The Developer shall submit a construction staging plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval which addresses such matters as materials staging, construction parking plan, construction and occupancy phasing, temporary access, construction schedule, temporary utilities, traffic control, emergency access, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 6. The Developer shall record a revocable right of way permit for any and all private property improvements located with the Town of Vail right of way. Said permit shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 7. The Developer shall submit a Shoring and Excavation Plan to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, which addresses such matters as excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans, detailed profiles and cross-sections, existing utilities, materials storage, permanent and temporary easements, etc. The Developer shall demonstrate full compliance with the applicable regulations of the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project. 8. The Developer shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with the list of issues identified in the memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Town of Vail Page 22 �J C � Public �Norks, dated November 30, 2011 and attached for reference (Attachment E). Said plans shail be submitted for review and approval and fully comply with all applicable regulations of the Town of Vail, in conjunction with the submittal of a building permit. IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Timber Ridqe Amendment to an Approved Development Plan Application, date stamped November 14, 2011 C. Development Plan Set, date stamped November 14, 2011 D. Proposed Final Plat (Timber Ridge Subdivision), date stamped February 11, 2010 E. Memorandum to George Ruther, Director of Community Development, from Public Works, dated November 30, 2011 F. Letter from Parking Consultants, LLC April 19, 2010 Town of Vail Page 23 � 0 � � �, v � � � CD N � � �i��'�d +�� i ��,�� ,��$'x�� Lots i-5, �locFc �, Lfnt�s Ricfa� Filir7� 1 (12�50 Narth Fr�or�tar�e R'a�d bYesF) �'' � �- �. r.� .� ;.:��,��. ..�,�s. i,�°`"°.-- �?"�, ��: ' �_�.,. r ;, ,r�%Y.7 � auk.�..;�Fr„�pW ty :� : � _ ._ _ ... .. .. . .. .. K00k �.: <•� �.� .�.�.. ...��.� . .;.. -� .,. , :,,..,:,. ., . ,,-^: : . ..�.,. . ,., . . , .� 1`�0 3�3� G04 � � � ❑ � ..�.. ;ti,L .. TIMBER RII)GE � �IMENDMENT TU �N APPRO�TED DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION 0 NOVEMBER 14 2011 u TIM�ER RITJGE DEVEI.OPMEI�T PLAI�i AI�IENDMENT NOVEMBER 14, 2011 Applicant Vail Timber Ridge LLC 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive El Paso, Texas Project Architect Humphreys and Partners Architects 5339 Alpha Road Suite 300 Dallas, Texas Consultin� Architect Victor Mark Donaldson Architects 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard # 207 Avon, Colorado Civil En ineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, Colorado Land Plannin� Pylman & Associates, Inc. 137 Main Street, C107W Edwards, Colorado Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 2 November 1, 2011 CJ 0 ' � 1.0 1.1 2.0 3.0 3.1 4.0 5.0 6.0 TABLE OF CONT�NTS Introduction Summary of Request Existing Development Plan Approval Proposed Amendment to Approved Plan Detailed Zoning Analysis Housing District Criteria for Evaluation Current Conditions of Approval Summary Tables Unit Tabulation Chart Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 1 1 2 3 3 7 11 12 6 3 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Summary of Request The purpose of this application is to provide information relative to a request for an amendment to an existing Development Plan approval for the proposed re-development of 5.24 acres of the existing Timber Ridge apartments. Timber Ridge is located at 1280 North Frontage Road. The legal description for the property is Lots 1 thorough 5, a resubdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C, Town of Vail, C0. The Town of Vail Zoning map designates Timber Ridge as Housing District (H). Development within the Housing District must receive Development Plan approval in accordance with the parameters and review criteria described in Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code. This application contains the information required by Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code to review and approve this application. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 � \ ", � 2.0 Existing Development Plan approval Timber Ridge was constructed in 1981 and remains the largest employee housing complex in the Town of Vail. The ten-acre site includes 198 two bedroom, one bath rental units in sixteen buildings. Each unit is 745 square feet in size. The Town of Vail purchased Timber Ridge for $20 million in July of 2003. In July of 2007, anticipating a redevelopment of the property, the Town rezoned Timber Ridge to the Housing (H) District. In December of 2008 the Town issued a Request for Proposals seeking interested and qualified development teams to redevelop approximately one half of the property. This process led to the selection of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC team. A development agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Timber Ridge LLC was entered into in October of 2009. The development agreement stipulates a redevelopment of the eastern half of the ten acre site and stipulated that Vail Timber Ridge LLC deliver 359 EHU's capable of housing a total of 570 beds. A Timber Ridge Development Plan application was submitted to the Town of Vail in January of Z010 and after a public open house process and several Planning Commission hearings the application was approved by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission on March 22, 2010. The PEC review process resulted in changes to the building design that improved the ground level site plan, site circulation and pedestrian scale design elements. Slightly rearranging the upper level building mass also resulted in revised rooflines that allowed for a greater variation in the building height. These revisions all resulted in an approval of a slightly reduced density of 352 Employee Housing Units and 520 parking spaces. The PEC action included approval of the proposed development plan and approval of a retaining wall height variance, and also included nine conditions of approval, which will be outlined later in this document. Upon PEC approval the project proceeded to the Design Review Board and on August 4 of 2010 the DRB granted final design review approval, with associated conditions. .�.. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 3.0 Proposed Amendments to Approved Plan � The proposed Timber Ridge project financing involves a very detailed and involved US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) review process. The outcome of that intensive review process has been a requirement to lower the densiry of the proposed development. The Town of Vail approved Development Plan is currently for 352 units totaling 544 bedrooms. The HUD financing approval limits the proposed plan to 279 units. This has necessitated a fairly straightforward re-design of the approved development plan. The lower density has been achieved by, in simple terms, eliminating one entire floor from the mid level of the approved five-story building. This includes removing one level from the approved five level parking garage. This re-design strategy allows the project to meet the HUD financing requirements while maintaining the integrity and spirit of the Town of Vail PEC and DRB approvals. No site revisions are required or proposed, other than some minor re-grading on the north side of the building along the lowered parking structure. The overall appearance and form of the PEC and DRB approvals is maintained. Building materials and colors have been slightly rearranged to match the reduced bulk and mass of the building scale and to coordinate with direction previously received from the DRB pertaining to the appropriate assemblage and proportion of the range of building materials and colors. The site plan, including vehicle circulation, surface parking, bike and pedestrian paths, fire lane design, courtyard designs, the enhanced bus stop and the landscape plan for the front of the building remain intact and unchanged. The ground level and first floor plans remain as approved, with a 7,900 foot athletic clubhouse, and the building entries, lobby and mail box area remain unchanged. The entire roofline has been lowered by one full story. This includes lowering the five level parking structure to a four level structure. All roof forms remain exactly as approved. There is no change to the utility service plans or to site drainage plans. 3.1 Detailed Zoning Analysis The stated intent of the Housing District is to ensure that employee housing is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 3 November 1, 2011 to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air and open spaces. 'rhere are no changes proposed to the existing approval for Permitted Uses, Conditional Uses, Setbacks, Site Coverage, Landscaping and Site Development Standards, or Lot Area and Site Dimensions. There are re�risions to the following standards: Parking, Building Height and Density Control. Parkin� The Housing District, in recognition of the unique nature and characteristics of employee housing, allows for, at the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, a reduction of up to a maximum of 25% of the parking requirements outlined in Chapter 10 of the Vail Land Use Code. This reductton may be is based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than required by Town Code. The current Timber Ridge Development Plan approval is for 352 units and 520 parking spaces, which represents a reduction of approximately 22% from the standard town requirements. The basis for allowing this reduction in the development plan approval was the significant improvements proposed to the bus stop located on the Timber Ridge site and the high level of transit service planned for this location. The current bus stop is little more than a wide spot at the edge of the Frontage Road. The proposed improved bus stop is physically separated from the roadway and has room to accommodate several buses at once. The amended plan proposes 279 units. There are 17 units less than 500 square feet in size and 262 units greater than 500 square feet. This equates to a parking requirement of 550 parking spaces. The amended plan includes a total of 424 parking spaces. Of these spaces 419 are located within the parking garage and 5 are exterior surface parking spaces. There are 77 compact spaces and 9 handicap designated spaces. This total of 424 spaces represents a 22% reduction from the Town of Vail standards. While the overall unit and parking numbers have both decreased the requested reduction from the Town of Vail standards remains at 22%, less than the 25% allowable and consistent with the current approval. Buildin� Height The approved building includes 3, 4 and 5 story elements and steps vertically with the site grade on both the east-west and north-south axes. The highest ridgeline measures at 76 feet, 9.5 inches above grade with several __ Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 4 November 1, 2011 architectural projections extending above this height. The rear five story element measures at 70 feet, 10.5 inches above grade. The proposed amendments drop the entire building down by one floor. The proposed building now consists primarily of three and four-story elements with a small area of two-story massing located at the eastern end of the building. Densit,y Control In October of 2009 Timber Ridge LLC and the Town of Vail entered into a development agreement that outlines the parameters of the proposed redevelopment of the 5.24-acre portion of Timber Ridge. This agreement stipulates a density of 359 Employee Housing Units capable of housing 570 beds. Minor changes in building massing and height through the initial development plan review process resulted in a minor density reduction to this number. The density approved by the PEC currently stands at 352 Employee Housing Units. The proposed density of the amended plan is 279 Employees Housing Units and a total of 431 beds. A urrit tabulation chart detailing unit type, size and count follows this page. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 5 � November 1, 2011 _.,,_ . �. �. .. __ _ e�.,,,, . �.... m�__ .._ e �..... _��._�_ _��_.,. . �.._�. ._�. �_. j v�a�� r��taE� �r�� _ .. _. _. ._.._. ._„_.. ._. � .. .�. . _ ..,,.� � .,,, �.. _.. ,__ _� . v ,..,..,. _.. _. _ . ......... ...... . , _ ..�,, ..._.. __�... ��. . _,_.. „ ._,� E iU,'�1Ci TAE3�.+LATlC71't °'' _�. ,._. _ �_......___ � ___ _ __� _.�- �.....�. ____ �_ _ � ...... . ��-.__� ._ _._. � _._ ... : U?�,T �7�'��E � �N1T T'Y�� . NEi� iV�EAia�) f7cc�r� Lct��;�*0� � G€iFA (S�} �#fNfT ��C�}�1� : �t Tf��`�Ai t��T '� # �ELI�.. _�� a m.� � "' 4T:�'�f�T � ��'t � � : �,; �. � � �1`l a � U+t t j.,� �. � < ; . .. . . ._ . . . y�„ �' y, 1 {y g}�� p �+ ( �".t. � �a'%Yj6LS� ��a �� ......{ .X�� i C� �i�kdf��'. ..�E �J'�.F P��T i # � .. -, ..�.� ...,� ...� ... „ . �a._ .. . . . ..�. .�.�» . . �� +,��t+�� .. t ��,� �` .�� ,ri�J�i1:� �. �-' �i� �`� � � ..�..,: ±a ��r. °f t�;'� � ,b"� � � . . i �_._ � Ai� _ ; _ �� f � �� ,,... 'q� �'S�' 1 i: �' .. . . _,. .�..�..��. .,L . �., u�..,,�.......�_�.__�.�..;f._._�. q � � I n� t�.�+ .� �s, 1 7 ) �e��iS.S7�� 'A�� "i �. i � li9 :�� f �11�1£c � J! l� F� :� . ,�'� � p��'''fi � )� ... ._ t�fh�i�lr'7. ... ��J � ......�....,,, ��. , "t �'°��......�� `it� n ._. ��7e, � . .... r...,. ...,.. .. . .. 7 ......... ... �5 h' �J_ � �7 _.. . "� � '�`Lc ��1v.i,� G�J''G�r� i G � �i � ( :17u �.� .. �� ...d� 1tI1 ��:�-- r �`� ` k.�' � .� � a.. ,��s�� E „ �t�� , � � - ,� ��1 . � .��1�� 1� 1�� '`� �..� ��. �'� _. _. < �.. ,.� ' ' " �1,� N' i � � �.'�'�''= � �?��.. ,.; �� j �,F � F �` ..{'. �} 1 ! �'J:1 e?��:"I `< � �s� ... { f 1� 1 ; ��"4'tALS �.�� : 1�b,Q".fa : 196,75(} 4�1 ; v � � a � � � a 0 � 7 � Q � a� > O L. f], a � O �..i N c v � 'b C a� � Q � � �o � �. � � E F � � � � ,-, 0 N `--i i, N � � > 0 z � 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation The Housing District describes six criteria that shall be used by the staff and planning and environmental commission as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. For the purposes of this application for amendment to an approved development plan the applicant response below compares the amended plan to the current approved plan. Those criteria and the applicant's response to each follows below: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. Applicant's response: The amendment to the approved development plan reduces the proposed density from 352 EHU's to 279 EHU's. This represents a reduction of 20% of the unit count and is a substantial reduction in the bulk and mass of the building. The strategy of revising the building by lowering the height by one full story reduces the scale of the building while maintaining the site design elements that were so carefully crafted through the previous review and approval process. As the previous plan was found to be compatible with this finding the proposed amendment should further the compatibiliry of the building design with the adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. The elements of the original design that were important to this finding all remain intact. The proposed Timber Ridge plan provides improvements that have been specifically designed to produce a functional development plan. A tremendous amount of parking is hidden from public view by a four level parking garage. Unit access and pedestrian circulation occurs primarily within the enclosed building. llnit floor plans remain unchanged, and remain functional and livable. Laundry facilities remain in each individual unit. The clubhouse plan remains unchanged. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan '7 November 1, 2011 � The site itself remains be the best available high density residential employee housing opportunity in the Town of Vail. Frontage Road and transit stop improvements are responsive to the site and the neighborhood. The building massing on the east end is meant to be responsive to the only residential neighbor. The lowering of the building improves this relationship. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is currently home to 198 two-bedroom apartment units in 16 buildings, with extensive surface parking and site retaining walls. The proposed redevelopment site of 5.24 acres includes 106 of those existing units. The existing development has already impacted the original natural features of this site. The proposed plan does maximize opportunities for access and use by the resident public by the design of the courtyard spaces. The courtyard design performs the dual function of providing a signif cant break in the front fa�ade of the building and also, in response to this criterion, provides a location for functional and aesthetic public spaces. The courtyards have varied landscape design themes that include a plaza for intimate public gathering spots, barbecue and fire pit areas and outdoor spas. The work session format with the planning and environmental commission, along with staff input, has resulted in revisions to the project that are extremely beneficial to the landscape design. Previous plans included a 24-foot wide driveway with parallel parking spaces all along the front of the building. This resulted in a significant width of asphalt and a difficult landscape design problem. The current approved plans have reduced this large expanse of asphalt to a combined bike path and emergency vehicle access lane. This change in vehicular circulation had opened up more area available for landscape planting and results in a much improved landscape design. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 8 November l, 2011 Overall the landscape design represents a tremendous improvement over existing conditions and provides a very functional and meaningful open space and landscape design. The proposed amendments to the plan were carefully designed to eliminate any affect on the approved site and landscape plan. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. Timber Ridge is located along the North Frontage Road and the town bicycle and pedestrian path has been designed to pass through the site on Timber Ridge property. The bike path through the site will also serve as an emergency vehicle access. Sidewalks along the building provide access to all entryways and connect to the bike path and to the adjacent bus stop. Vehicular access and circulation is direct and efficient. The North Frontage Road will be improved with acceleration and deceleration turn lanes at the primary vehicular access to the parking garage. Cars will enter the site and directly access the centrally located parking � garage. A second vehicular access is shared with the bus stop and provides access to the remainder of the existing Timber Ridge units and to surface parking spaces that will serve short term, business office and drop off needs. Again, the proposed amendment to the approved development plan does not affect in any way the approved pedestrian and circulation plan. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the projecYs environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. A full environmental impact report has been completed for the proposed project and evaluated as a part of the design process. The recommend mitigation measures include improvements to the North Frontage Road to allow for appropriate turning movements and Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 9 November 1, 2011 � � several alternative rockfali mitigation options. The applicant and the Town of Vail will work together towards the final design and implementation of these mitigation ineasures. The 20% reduction in unit count lessens any impacts and improves the already approved mitigation measures. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other application plans. The proposed amendment to the project density does not have any effect upon the previous consideration of compliance with the comprehensive plan. ..�=::: __. . . �� K . . .��.}'i�..:�. . � � Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 10 November 1, 2011 • 5.0 Current Conditions of Approval The March 22, 2010 PEC Development Plan approval included nine conditions of approval. A few of those conditions have been addressed through the DRB process or through further rockfall analysis and a decision to pursue an alternative mitigation strategy. The remainder of those conditions may and should be carried forward with this amended application. For the purpose of this application narrative the assumption is that Town of Vail Communiry Development Department staff will revise and carry forward conditions as appropriate in their staff report to the Planning Commission. Therefore the previous individual conditions have not been repeated or specifically addressed in this narrative. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 11 November 1, 2011 l�I 6.0 Summary The Town of Vail has determined, through the 2008 Employee Housing Strategic Plan, that the policy of the Town of Vail will be "To ensure there is deed restricted housing for at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of Vail. This goal will be met by policies and actions that (1) ensure new development keeps up with this goal, and (2) development projects sponsored by or in partnership with the Town to "catch up" to meet this 30% goal. The Town has initiated several actions. The buy down program and the Town actions to construct low density deed restricted ownership units will continue to provide great ownership opportunities to local families. In order to really make progress in the "catch up" arena a project of significant density is necessary. The Timber Ridge site has the physical and locational attributes to allow for this site to be the best opportunity for the Town of Vail to create a significant increase in deed restricted beds within the community. Vail Timber Ridge LLC believes that we have addressed the program request of the Vail Town Council with a building and site design that is appropnate to the location and the neighborhood and meets all of the criteria required for Housing District Development Plan approval. This proposed redevelopment of a portion of Timber Ridge will provide a tremendous community benefit. The proposed density reduction that is the subject of this amended development plan application is a direct requirement of the lending program. Although this application reduces the number of units and beds available on site the overall project still provides a tremendous benefit to the community. � Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 12 November 1, 2011 SOUTH ELEVATION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ,�„ � i�p�t � � � � � �'p� !-.°A � P f } d ' � '� kt. �� y� � { �� ..: f ( � . � . � � � t ��r �� .r, �-� '�' � r..�. P� � s, tv �^}, � �A}� � h.A .�._��# ��'� �� , «- ,, ,� € �. � ' (x� i '�.�a I �,�i � � _ ;-��k+ � � � !, �' � �� ;_ .v _,._._ �, VIOTOH MAPK DONAL080N AHCMITECTB SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED VAIL TIMBER RIDGE 1280 North Frontage Road, Vail CO 11.28.2011 � HUMPNn .....xsP3�nC..��T..w.�� • • � � � ��s�`�.'M.i�. �° � .� � ��m ��.p�� '�r#'2�r� �-- � 6 � ' I f � �.I � � �` � �a+. , T�j� r�� L 1(1� �(�i1 �1 17 � ` u �� t l Q � 4 a l�! t`i I� �7 ��,�`.,��.�, �I:f ;�1'��1�I�I:t.fI,IL� :1� _ l.i; L.�� ----------� .� I_. �� , � , _��J�. - WEST ELEVATION ��` � �;ti' "':, °k`�1 � � � � "�`t � "°�i ,: L� ��, „ r � ._ � �_ � �� nCl CI �" t] ��;�� ' L�' �' �(1' �� j � l `1 _�l �� - _� — _ — _ EAST ELEVATION � YI�TON M4PK CONALOSON AFCMITECT4 VAIL TIMBER RIDGE 1280 North Frontage Road, Vail CO ,,.28.2�„ NUMPHPCYS L PAPTN[PS�A�CHIT[�sq 11.28.2011 EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTLIRE: BV: SEAGULL LIGHTING CORPOtYATION SINGLE-LIGHT WALL PAOUNTEO FI%TURE, B3JB�1� WI BRONZE FINISH q10 BALCONYLOCATIONS � � � ( �� r „� � � � _' � 3 �"� � R4 a_�S ' EXTERIORLIGHT�FIXTURE: �� BV. SEAGULLLIGHTING CORPORA710N SINGIEUGHT CHA0.LESTON OUT�OOF WALL MOUNTED FIXiURE, 08430-BS w/ DARK SKV LENSE W/ GOL� PATINA FINISHp85, GROUNOLEVEL �� i � ��c � - {� i � cl t; L__.. - � << �,,,,, �,.., s�on=,r�.�_a. ..�.,.,_ � .c.;r� aion=_c � J CONSULTING ARCHITECT VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS 0�48 BEAVER CHEEK BWD. AVON� COLORAOO 87620 � VAIL TIMBEI� RIDGE 1280 North Frontage Road, Vail CO SIDING 1: FASCIA: CEftTAINTEED CORPORATION CERTAINTEEO CORPORATION FIBERCEMENTVERTICALSIDING ROOFMG FIBERCEMENT90ARD BENJAMIN MORE. CERTAINTEEO CORPORATION BENJAMIN MORE, JACKSON TAN HG-06 SHINGLE ROOfING AU�UBEN RUSSET HG51 —+ � , •. �� 4 r � � - � [_ i � �� li'�i � � ( v31� 1 �'�" � t4t d...^'# --_e .. IH.. {) �9 � ' �":�. I_i�:.—L-y I :.�i�...�__I �- r � i � _. P��. : � � ,� � �`:k� � C , �� ..-�rti i �� , -� METAL ROOFING: BERRIGE MANUFAGTU0.ING C0. STANOMG SEAM, OARK BROZE S � E i � 3I� � e� F[ . � F"""7 L.3 � i `i `' rf -� �� I �-�� srucco t BENJAMIN MOORE. HOT SPRINC STONES AC�31 BUILDING - C • STUCCO 2: BENJAMIN MOORE, PISMO OUNES AC-]4 SIDING 1' CERTAINTECO CORPORATION FIOER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING BENJAMIN MORE, JACKSON TAN HGd6 E � �'- : �'. '� WINDOW d DOOR TRIM: CERTAINTEE� CORPORATION FIBER CEMEh'T TRIAI BENJAAiIN MOORE. ALLIGATOR GREEN 21aJ-20 AjiCHITECT � ,....,.�_ �._. .„ HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P. 5]�9 ALPHA HOAO • SUITE �00. CGLLA6, TE%AS 75340 ❑ � � � 11.28.2019 E%TERIOR LIGHT FIkTUftE: BV: SEAGt1lL LIGHTING CORP00.ATION SINGLE-LIGHT WALL MOUNTED F�XTURE. 83J8-10 W/BRON2E FINISHNIO DALGONYLOGATIONS EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE'. BY�. SEFGULI�IGHTINGCORPORATION SINGLE-LIG4T CHARLESTON OUTOOOR WALL MOUNTED FI%TURE, 88430-85 WI OARK SK1' LENSE Wl GOLO PATINA FINISHq05, GROUN�LEVEI \/AIL TIM�ER RIDGE 1280 North Frontage Road, Vail CO SIDING 1: FPSCIA: SIDING 7: CERTAINTEED CORPORATION CERTAINTEED CORPORATION CERTAINTEED CORPORATION FIBERCEMENTVERTICALSIDIN6 ROOFING: FIBERCEMENT90AR� FIBERCEMENTSHFKESIOING 9EJAMIN MOORE, CERTHINTEED GORPORATION BENJAMIN MOORE, BEJAMIN MOORE, WETHERSFIEL� MO55 HC-110 SHINGLE ROOFING GRANOFATHER CLOLH BROWN 2096J0 WETHEFSFIEL� MOSS HC�110 ! y " : •, o .�, :�,. wiHOOw s 000arairo��. CERTnINTEEO GORGORATION FI9ER CEMENT fHlhf 9ENJAMIN MIOORE, NEN' CHESTN�TAL-6 METAL ROOFING: BERFIGE MANUFACTURING CO. STANDING SEAM, �ARK BftONZE C�NSULTING ARCHITECT VICTOR YVIARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS B U I LD I N G' B 0048 �EAVER CREEK BLVD. AVON, COLORAUO 81620 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCIiITECTS, L.P. SJJ9 ALPMA ROAO. SUITE J00 • �ALLAS� TEXdS 75440 11.28.2011 E%iEFIOR LIGHT FIATUR[: BY: SEAGULL LIGHTING CORPORATION SINGLE-LIGHT WALI AIOVNTED FIXTURE, e]�8-10 W/ BRONZE FINISH #10 BAICONV LOCATIONS £ ' � �� t��✓r �� f� � r� i.yj. 1 y E%TERIOF LIGHT FI%TURE: � BV� SEAGULL LIGHTING CORPORATIG,V SINGLE-LIGHT CHARLESTON OUTOOOR WALL MOUNTED FIkTURE, 98430-55 W! OARK SKY LENSE WI GOlO PATIN 4 FINISH#85, GROUN�IEVEL ""'� - " --v.w� �� ' f:: r�. �.,.....J.� �_.�-��-- � >�qi �_ �� .�: ., ..�,-.A.,�-��+m:�.+r-%��. 5 i ONE'✓��E'cR: CO�OftA00 B�FF 5?RIP J CONSULTING ARCHITECT VICTOR MAR!( DONALDSON ARCHITECTS 0048 BEAVEP CREEK BLV�, pVON� COLORADO 87620 ` � VAIL TIM�ER RIDC�E 1280 North Frontage Road, 1/ail CO SIDING 1: FASCIA: GERTAINTEED CORPORATION CERTAINTEED CORPORATION FIBERCEMENTVERTICALSIOING ROOFING�. FIBEftCEMENTBOARD BENJAMIN MORE, BENJAMIN MOORE, RICH CLAY BROWN 2164-30 CERT,41�'TE_D COi2PORATIO^1 LATE OLIVE HC112 � ��h�_ri��.. � ��w..� „ .� .. /. � , . �� .'.. � - ' ... �.,,,,,,_, .,,,, , �� ' �-_w-n, ��..�,��.,�,.».,»»»„�� r,tE;ALf3ooFlM1C�. ... siuCCOi�... .. ...... .. . ..... BERRI�GE MANUFACTURING C0. BEJAMIN MOORE,ApOBE BEIGE,AC-] STANDING SEAM, �ARK BRONZE Bui�oiNG - A • 1 I„ i �v� m.u�..�„�w . �.. ��..'�.- . . STUCCO2 �ENJAMIN MOOftE, BU7E ROCK, AC-B CuLO� �o�� SIDING 2: CERTAINTEED CORPOR4TION FI6ER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING BENJAMIN MORE, RICH CLAV BROWN 216C-JO WiNDOW TRII��. MFTERIAL VARIES EENJAAIIN MOORE, FOCKI[5 �3ROl'/N 210',JO ARCHITECT HUMPHREYS 8� PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, L.P, 5979 ALPMA ROAD • SUITE J00 • OALLAS, TEXAS 75Y40 • � r�- �' -_ --'-- �' �°� LION�S RIDGE LOOP (PU�UC R.O.W.) -____-- �--___ � ' �-"_I`' ._ -- ------- ----------- -.-� _--__---___'__-'____- ___'__'______ '___"_ _' �so ------- - --- ..---- ----- --- `--- - ---- "___________ ____'_______ __— _ _ __— - --_—_ __ --___� _'_- � __.'_ _f'M_'-____" _ � � '�- I I ... — $- �_ _ _��- } _ I _ ___ � _ � _ _ _ _ _ _ -- tli9a_ _ _ _ _ _ _' _ _ _ — __ _ _—IB— — — _ _. _ _ — -� = _ _ _ , _ �� i _. _ — - _ '_ _ — _ -- �—� ' � ._ _ _ _ — _- _ _. _ _ _— __ _ _ _ 7 _ — ��t _� — _ _ _ 8�50� — --� � _ — — _ �L �_ — � � _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ __ __. _ _ _ _ — _ _�' _ — � — _ _ � � �� _ � � � — — _'_ _ — _. — � i �-p — -�. ______ —__' __— .�_— ____ j_ _ _. � _� _.: �______. -- _ ..aa _ —__'___ __ _ _ _' _—__ "' __ ' � _ —___ . — _' _ _—_ — �—_— —_. // _ � _— _ i _. _ _ -- _'_ — —=i - - o '_a _ _ _ _ _. _ _ ___ _ _ ` _ v . J �---��— � �- � _— _ � _ " " . _. T � ----- _� � ' _�� :�_— ' . — !t � '_ - ' —' ' _ . "` — - — — _ — — <vM �>,�,.,, ' — � � - � _, _ — _`` _ - �; __ -_ ____ rnarosccrt.a� j I\ � �. _ O A .__.._.' _ -._ _'- .�._ '_ _— . ___t-�o HE [ 1 _ ___.y._. I " I r I � / . � - _. ' _ _ _ _ _ � � ' � I� � - - � \ ��e�zc- -_' � I - � / i \ � _ J�. � � - � `�=' _ __ _ _ If�ll � �` - - � �-� \% rv, I I _ -�/� �—_ _ ___ � � �-—� VAIL TIMBER LODGE LANDSCAPE LEGEND FR�S s,caa savcn SHRU85 s.eors � Q�s� � es r uusso ,,I„ e e�oc e�uxuinsn � rewe �`(� es.�swu � ,�,��c o�"u�osva e'� 'a-'•�nv O` cor„EOCicon-�"'�i'�ewsrFns Ei fRONi�GE SLIPUUTIOX: <OtDMW BLIIE S0.UCF t]' AVfMLE OG smen norrr�ce: eoo � pEQU1PF0 SVRU�- 66 PROVt0E0 SVRUCE-l0 (MA%OUE TO F15EM[Nf5 GUfIlIItES) R oU1RED SISPEN �� 11' AVEMGF OG P V1�E0 ASGEN� 9B OilllR TPEES [N iROMAGF: 3] s cu/ u �„�� w 5 c.wit O�J � r ��mccv �ocs • � ooun no SGWIi Hny� S uV O 5 msw Hunioimo tz4n4» v'W s cwsr cNc cauce fuons �oo> aono vaottr�we� snwun o�oc�oo awE sau� ir •veanee x s er marrtnce: as� � 0.0.0V1'O D SMttICE-11 0 EO SVRUCE-ll 1� QulqNC ,�SP[X TPEFS i]' �V6UGE OG P0.0N�EDKffN�ll� TpiAL REQUIR� TREES: M tOTK iPEE51ROV[DEC 01 S1PEF! i0.01R�GE: M GROUNDCOVERsrcna ma�' � � tiuw.urt�ns ��wvas sa�u�� e� ur.x vos. sn.c.c ��c �� swvta ��'umv�e�`uswi.erars�s.wamr icw�s s�neercrsiuwru iewui SfJl/M MLSGWRDfLOWEAS s�wSURFACEMATERIALS suvvn 1%6 s crLw � x osvm mw�MOOO nui[x- ... ros fc.Wa> Q Nnf-c�m000nwcttinr+� xe,s1asF a mauo aanw� •n�omaM• ' icwx'�RRIWTION �� . . ... �PA1cAnon sSiEn sMUl eE PEMMU'6rt Nro cnw[ � n� N� sw,u ee our enmens w nrez� �. LOW VOLT UaHi1N� LEOENO o„ aw. ax mrc- ooc w�m css riacr �ENERALNOTES: �� o�'transformer screen fence � IRRIGATION LEGEND EMfITER SGMEDULE PIPE LEGEND ,.��,� .�. � DRIP EOUIPMENi r� �/�InM�en� " Ca�own '� 1retmFFCWUiYY�Cw� / w�Pmtwwn�HC OI `SPRAY HEA0.5 O rmlpi�atie : r.VrAt � �roA �le I a � EQUIPMENil� lil f Nnrta.u[�a aa ann6�o �vw � I�I�w 0 �ua w.s.� n.�ncN � O transformer scree .�.,� F�°y'i � ;.�i?�' � � � ` � � ��F,: �', , c;fst� = Q � L, �`(.�� 7 � � cansfarme� ' )' WOOC (BlIC! W� flowenng shrvbs anG '^y grounticovers- ane �-� evergreen shru6 � 48' o.<. �-- n detail I � � ■ t - -- �" � — — �n� i I �� , � i � I ,� _�' ; � � 5-STORY PARKING GARAGE --i ----%�- _ " '— � � � � I \ \�- \ ` '_ ' _ ` _ _ — 1 � � \ __� \__ _ /' owlw ,__�_\\, �� \\ , � N � rn_1 -= ' ^ I ii u K � �;\�9i �C �"�. ' \`\\ �`` �" 1 \��' � �� \ 1 t/�B � �V�� j�i � �_� ��i,�� i'i I'1�� '�I�i ��I�� " 1� � '� i I � 1 �. I ' ' �` I 1 � `1_ � � 1 � r1 \� � \b�\`�k ,', ' '_ % I�� \� � � -�\c. I`� .� ,y�;, ,;, � � �, ��,� � . � � II, � :, � i� �i�� 1 \` I i'i, � '� !` �, °��, 1, . ,\ , �� , �-, , � , �I' '� J / i� � / ��4� i � _ ��'�y �� J �� ,,>, �_�. '�--�- VAIL 7IMBER LODGE LANDSCAPE LEGEND fT 5 seevvMNU�ar rsvarc SHRU05 ercax s�xvon GROUND�OWER�sxaei s '� mivarvc nsrvi �• c.vsio ,�I„ e ea ema s�"v�� O � xvan ucus wuoerasu � c�un� ""s i wuxa 1'� r 1 56WSf GO�� ]UNI�VEW9�Nl�ib'SMGMI�I' 1GM/]S W�N�CO. ��E SYMINGASrtOf9 f G4/]! N BISVG^U� Il'.l�•/l9 ORIl1VlMECIUIPA.Wi O LIL�G � M14CwIlOFtAWEM1Sp 1G�1/1Vt N1MDOS O <OTWEASiE0.L�to�i� 5W41] �WiEM1WFltVtic95� �Wt/16 wypHyypuh ��s ��s��p��r URFACEMATERIHLS sayQrr ��s`xa'"wx srxu� arn �'�ONiw�iu�ee'� avEVSwae ' uu v ey, e e.w�e EWgx�C��o� `J AMU0.5�LVFAGPA59 SNREOUEOHAR�WOOOMUIOI� Myppp T Gt/1 � nSNOwnWNOU S GAy11 O P�XNIS[NN NOV[CUROIDPS f 41LM �]' DEPfX MINIMUM. FWMNN GPASS ^\ y�,y�p v/��CU�PV m�� 5GN/II /�NBµUnm11DB�M lGW6� � NV. - `a'q G�wr V///II�� "�°Ne �c�un O sr�v�,Wno��me� un i� mmwoeEw�uxoncman :e,wsF Jl �/ M�TV[M'EaBIRW I G4U �/C �o CEBEnN ��u 5� W•n01Mf1' �' W9 1 I 1 is cwn '�RRIGATION \J �� wcnnarvsrsrzns�uuxrwu.vevr�no S Gu/59 SNALL BE ONP EMrtR0.5 ON liMpt� STV1�GWGWWO ipe P TMER lOW VOLT L10Hi1NO LEGQJO � LOW VOLT LIOFrtINa LEOEND � �m� ��,,...w.A.�,.. ..a o , GENERALNOTESn ;�:�� a ��n�. � u 6' OFH POC[R CUf M� S�PL'CIYRALf4M1 ro.w wrm wma+cl �oevmrumuauww planting i GRAPXIC SCALE prelimi�ary �an�{scape p�a�� lJ swle: 1' = 2p� 1 arewouoer.ww¢,w '�ni' `mw`w:c°e imai ww� wan.»Lw FE kWE INMALLCNS MM nEF �RBYNG. i3 GA fn/.�A Wlv. SiFd w�nxornAnwau. FNCAfFIOOPWP6NF. �Iµ�.iRFF�SiIS6.lUNM9l�'drnW.M� RYee HOSF.—, s �IOOHmn,vfnuo.ra�earn>u4 � r�c_X iw'uov�ESSronooia�ww P� uoNSC�oeeomve �OSdLMD1UFE@[rtvro�tt a � - I �WI IE FBN� w11MUIMCONP'IqNS �90ME M1M0N0. MT � I foam detail Q C � � LY � i dro�M !' _M�M. �.�� , FPNRfl'SBPMIM1E0.5 �,. A((�IlECiS. V. i 0 ...,,�n..� � � Pa � I i��ID . �li � � � _�`__.�� —� � AP ,----- court ard #1 enlargement� T�. �o �,a � coTurt�yard #3 enlargement� � sw e: 1 — SO' �T � courtyard #2 enlargement� s� �: � _ io „� � courtyard #4 enlargement�� swle: 1'�� 10' � � T � �, �x ,� � Q� �r �_ _� _� 3 �� ,� , � Gore Range �Su rv—eying, uc ""-��' i,mi a+�s,�. � � PINAL PLAT Covn 'DE.J/ TIMBER RIDGE SUBDIVISION ��,��.� A RESUBDIVISIQN OF LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION.BLOCK C, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS I, 2, 3, 4� 5 eo� . TOWN OF VAIL, COU:NTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO �.o�,..�...,. �� 'rn �£ite �a{w'� T6—rmel��[� ior� y',.`�r.y . irouvwdmin iimnnafn . l�i'v4J urtqnu�u�ao wi m� � ll,'DEE'� �'i�E9iRi c.T� oJ FOR EHU'� I2.�-'ri� Cs��tED �D Vr4cu.nE Er4gF�n�uw'� Certl11ca1a olO�Elnllon anE Ownera�lp ' n �<ow�YVmryrom wqwua+ X�no..�.o.n.�un�i..PUmp.unducma.n rv,ibM�in��.m�wnu�m.npwn.i.uxa�seipiq�nraiwmaN m v � BIOdC,lms1,2�,�a50��I�epbtlMrze�iem�JOJJUmalfNln BeoYiYYnIPap+�seundnll�apYenne.�ssw9innrtelheM wEiql�cwni�<Im�WR�uN.�, n.i"d.�� 'amr°�e�r.°,in�°;a�°w::�.,;wM1.�u�',.:annNe�nq :Me.zacm",eroe,bf.,,evu.,�w��no,nno��mnnm,iM...a.a�.i �.a d•Pw Oan�p nap.Rtlelom�iwi,�Mee�Fer�paAbbY�.mrNOnxMUl�w�np�rf� MP Wlat �n uy na�ems.nilpmp.�bbipoHm�iMam•�ue Oni •Ceb��Leronl+aBwrWOA �COR�nYOn bnw:VW.COlt6f>R6W�r.i TA�:, STn1FOF ��69 LOYNrvOf ) ��4 �o� w�.eay.e ai.n �n nk _ a�r b NnmenPb��.luoeaei�HOnNpceipuiawuaconmae ry nwporimn. . i.ry G.mmwbn np�e��_ wun�urryn enaMntl.i.ea . � pry � UsO�NNaMnelu.emtlen ._. 6T�IE 0 � �'� couNttO� 1 . cn raxb�•��a�Mevbai.nm.N��Jaya �%�p e� � rM ��.an uqm._ __ na. cenum.i. � ��ncomo�roa..n.��er..nmmmu.nw.mx�a..i�wa+ix.rv.�..w.. � eimro.a+ xao�o c.m�ia.., um�m A�wo�� w�.m., un w. i.ww ��+.o x...ma..i en a�..w.��mm..�.., nwu., na.,.,: o.edNiiuulou.s.em�rvaYenaNVe�leYOn.i � Mluh��•��•� 0 Mo.e�oe�o. Apem�yn�i e % _--•__ nbN 01 CJ surv.ya.: c.ninui. Aeo�vebyre P'a11 Y�w n Ae�ec�. iM �W pt��.� mooa Inom�x rvrv%Wn �peMhm M�p^�n m�remyni ol opp el ep roiwpx��uuS.lYuneil�n6 'mer�n �pe py�lln�eiry �er��n ToWnCevn�4Cnn111<ale � , . . suO�nloNeoA.+��v�I��a�vualNnoxamy'e't+cic �'sq°" �Wt�Tw n.town eIMNm� uYI�.N �°,ryk�n oon�u��v�arrreW��W�A��.wevi�n.'6m �OCeni�wpnneuuon�nan�0�s�wipopi�l'v� �( .n em+ma�o-1.wn.e.n.ne.�.mrv��mmr=iib��nm�meroiv�eio..mvw. ' .nem t � Tnne vM,falram rv.neere;ie.neiv�,[aoneo Plannlnp cnd Fnvlronm�nl.l Comml¢alon Cer1111ce10 .Mmpnm�yonrwbyin�Temoivanrwwq�nee,.wm.n��iwmmwwru+. i TmmelNn,plonJO TmmNVmlelavxqeNemlranmonultamrn:��An Ce�Yllcol� e� Texaa P�IE ' tm e�.ki.�d.pi,a,.a�,�.�m.a.,w�roi.�wei e.�.a.e.��ua,.��ao,�, . Tnuv.n ei eap. oo � . � c�en.naqo�o�ar,cmm�.ie . � — ru. rui..� nee ar�.w mma amemn�. con,�e n��a., n_ame�.� e, ��a_ ry � �ntlltOSY��eoOdP�iryuenNe. . , oK�� dRqFT ' C.Yw�'�� . Attachment D ' u ` � � FINAL PLAT TIMBER RIDGE SUBDIVISION A RESUBDIV1510N OF LION'S RfDGE SUBDIVIS�ON BLOGK C, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS I, 2, 3, 4� 5, TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OP GOLORADO. N�C.�� yy�"1 ��4 lbo �QVi� ope . ,:,. � � v. � R�°� '[ 5 SL" y,�^+` . �°`' .,. ..?iJ�.� v� �5ip�°.. �m�/J.S� ' '�./ �� f . i ' / ! ��i'.. � y'� �9 ) l I,, Sti��. . /\ vr/�\ i/ � ' ' "` � �� ✓ �% �(+ �' :�F�ICl� ' ' 'tb G�utm ar mrt u " �•� •. \ �l�'� � � �U ' . 6q�. ' � � �y � rQ� � ` �� / w�m .�,- / �j,i,.: ��V' � " ';�� j � � �\ �ws:rn e au�� ;.f�.�s9 , ' .., -� `� O �' j '� �,,�?�°•: e _� t � � .� � '' � /�.'-_ � - � . f 4;- ..u�.. �...u.� , r:�" , M�,\r �,�>,�,p=,. ; y c,, , , " ��,��'° / . / .� .. •'\� � n/ cJLl`� � � � .. ,' . . % "`\; � �.,��,� ..., �n/nsil�r.�s�v�i � � l .F i (�)aeoi.rno i�i� . ...c7�.�n _y,� � J./ l (.' . � � . / ��`; p " � � j � �" / �� \ IL,mK..�✓ , ', �� ' '�� . `c �e ,°� . / y�� '�.\ � v µ ursmm00a:nu�c �^ 1� i�/�M1N�, ' 3,9 5� ' . '�a5- C:�.,i :��Q�„w�u. 5W . . . ' �,� � C' ��' �!i i^e5�1563 . PARCEL 8 *�J.� � � � . . LION'S RIOGE SUBOIVi510N �`+'?y \',� / , ,� '�. _ FIIJNC No. 2 . /•�1.9. ' � . . (REC. No. ta1219)' , �,�: sg� ' . . 7� �w�oxu�ssm cnr � ' . . . . / � / - . / / SAVOY NLLAS coaooMiNiu�{5 / (REC. No. 6427D5) / °" � �w� `" . , 0 61!'�Mm"': � io �RO ,r ��, .,.. � , 537'09'31"E - 273.28' I RA�IUS a 1771.95' . �"`^1f° °• ""s °�" �n�r DELTA m 11'S4'12" r � h /x,, "��'� i.ic.. :��j� ARC � 368.13' i \ (� _ .�v�zo � TANGENT m 194.72' '"N0 eeii �� CHOR� � 367.46' °�m '� �+ / �f/ `� �..� ' o�iio RG e NS}ry5'DO"E u`�� o �\as' � /�o.unrz /V' O\ � \i �i..a ` � ' . � . V� i � uocmm�� eu� . ..� �u u?n/ � . ��_ .l�ytY�`� \ . � ..� �� ., x �@euR"o,�"o � �u . �f p n �Y .✓/ ' L N .o, y ^C �,ur o °'_ 'h >. .�. < � fo ' y 'n � .,.� �:"';°� �� ,*) �,1;� ' , /^ /B �� cw � � �/. Ja�oe.,� �r,u vn d" � °�\��e.,i' C ' \pi' w:� �s.u,� +4 �' u�j', •,%i;". �,:- ;� i �. �� , ( ^`!^ ,�v j<.:.;.,\ .i�� . a��U�� . , .\ �..�� or 2'. b i�\\ .✓ ,:..\, U -,�.�a.�.du:�. �.�,� . a , '�j! /. . � .� /Y�� v�1. / � � ��.;k\ -' ' . i � / �, �' c,y"'/i ��., ..�.�m �`� y •'�� ,,.; �. "' M' ,".'�,\ ` , - � �Y, ° i ��. � \�/ :! e <% � �PQ-�F.SI � . _ �o r �> . fl uno.r �iJ �l'� ,y�S°'y ,1�0� L�I G� S' ��.,%' ,\ , � Fj0.�. `' ' � �� '�IK�.'R��'a' Z ..�im;�mn.� Cj}'~ ) / y0ry`� �y+l �j_1'� \� / / `, ir ; ,;j' yy'L � � Po ` . C ,w5�"� c�� .. � '. � -� . . � t �. �\,\\.. �':` / � { �°,o+. � . � >i P � �;'r.�..�\ H � !%gm. � ��6�� & � , . J�' �� / \ SSA ��,P .. ,�. �,,, a u,�,��, F.lF.�4;etu�.. C�°�{ Cao�,) �n�s+i . , CRAPHIC SCALE i m.�> - o � i. . . t ° � �� Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 970-479-2158 Fax: 970-479-2166 www. vailgov. com MEMO To: George Ruther From: Public Works Re: DRB Review of Timber Ridge Redevelopment Date: 11 /30/11 1. Transit Area; a. Show a connection along the north side of the transit loop (w/ stairs as needed) to a crosswalk across the drive entrance to just south of the club entrance. 2. Engineered analysis on the existing condition of the gabion walls to remain will be required, details on how to connect to existing gabion walls and how to build walls beneath the existing gabion walls will be required, as well as construction shoring plans showing no impact to the adjacent properties. 3. Frontage Road; a. A CDOT access permit approval will be required prior to approval. b. Full CDOT frontage Rd design plans will be required as a part of this project c. A full width overlay will be required as a part of this proj ect for the limits of the Frontage Rd improvements. 4. Accommodations for a bus stop on LRL shall be made. 5. Drainage; a. Provide a Drainage Report 6. A preliminary lighting plan layout has been provided show lighting type, fuctures, power source, dimension spacing. The Frontage Road lighting should match the pending Frontage Rd. Lighting Master Plan. 7. Building; a. Cross-over aisles shall be 30' unless a variance is approved. 8. Traffic Study; a. The Traffic study will need to be updated, once the final prograin in the development is determined. b. The traffic engineer will need to include in the the traffic report a section on the adequateness of the short term parking spaces. 9. 4' min clearance required behind fire hydrants. Boulder wall behind proposed hydrant at the transit area will need to moved back. � � l0. The development will require a public art component. 11. Please add Utility Signature block and have all utilities sign acknowledging acceptance of utility design. 12. All construction staging issues shall be resolved prior to construction including staging, construction parking plan, phasing, access, schedules, traffic control, emergency access, etc... 13. A ROW/Utility permit shall be obtained and approved by the Town of Vail prior to commencing any construction within public Right of Way. 14. A Town of Vail Revocable ROW permit shall be recorded for all private property improvements located within public ways. 15. A CDOT access permit shall be approved prior to Civil Plan and Building Permit submittal, and a CDOT Notice to Proceed set of plans shall be approved prior to approval of Building Permit. 16. Prior to approval of a Building permit all necessary permanent and temporary easements are recorded with Eagle County. 17. Prior to approval of a Building permit a shoring and excavation plan shall be submitted including; excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans with plan, profile and cross sections. Cross Sections and plans shall include all existing conflicts (i.e. utilities). 18. Any excavation shoring methods used that encroach upon adjacent public or private property shall have approval by the appropriate owner and have a recorded easement prior to construction. This includes CDOT and the Town of Vail Right of Ways. 19. A CDPHE Permit and all applicable ACOE permits (i.e. Dewatenng) shall be submitted pnor to construction. 20. If temporary and/or permanent dewatering is anticipated during construction, a dewatering soils analysis will be required by a qualified licensed engineer analyzing the impact to adjacent properties(i.e. settlement) � Parkittg C�n3uiiants L1C April 19, 2010 Mr. Tom Kassmel, PE Town of Vail 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81632 Re: Vail Timber Ridge Project Dear Mr. Kassmel, • Functional Design � Parking Studies • Investi�ations � Structural Design � We understand from Table 5: Parking Lot Standards in Section 14-5-1 of the Town of Vail Standards, that the referenced project is not in compliance with crossover drive aisle dimensions. The Town's minimum standard is 30' for two-way traffic flow and the center wall-to-column climension shown on the plans developed by Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. is less than 30'. Rick Pylman provided us project drawings and forwarded to me an email dated April 14, 2010 in which you disclosed the basis for the Town's minimum standard which is Parleing Structures, Third Edirion, by Chrest, Smith, Bhuyan, Monahan and Iqbal, 2001. In that email you indicated that you would consider a lesser dimension if you were convinced that the narrower width would not compromise the funcrion of the facility. We, of course, are very familiar with the source of the data the Town used in establishing the standard. It is a very good reference document. There are two other sources used throughout the parking industry: The Dimensions of Parking, published by the Urban Land Institute, and Guideline.r for Parking Geometrics, published by the Parking Consultants Council of the National Parking Association. It is surprising that neither of these basic publications address the turning radius and aisle dimensions at an end bay in a parking facility. Thus the cited document is the accepted standard because it is written down and can be referred to. You stated the Town is looking at Table 3-4 and Figure 3-5 with LOS C criteria in Parking Structure.r. LOS is an acronym for Level of Service and C is a classification within a range of A to D, with A being the highest rating. The LOS system was developed by traffic engineers years ago to use when designing streets and intersecuons. The authors of Parking Structures adapted the classification system to parking structures where it focuses on geometry. LOS A provides very generous parking stall sizes, aisle widths, turning radii, hear-room clearances, and so forth. LOS D is used more for urban and congested settings or garages where the user is more familiar and more tolerant. Here are a few comments on the Vail Tunber Ridge �roject 1. The width between the end of the center wall and the inside face of the column along the center grid is 26'-10". �I'he basis for the Town standard, Parking Str��ctarre.c (2001), acknowledges that there are actually three conditions at cross over aisles that warrant different appropriate minimum dimensions. One-Way circulation requires a width of 15'-9", 3400 E Bayaud Avenue, Suite 300 • Denver CO 80209 • 303355.1069 • www.parkingconsultantsllacom � V ail Tunber Riclge Parl:in7 Facility Pa�e 2 "I'wo-�Y1ay concentric requires 28'-0", and Two-way non-concentric requires 31'-6". This garage is designed for concentric operations. For simplicity the Town selected a ininunum width requirement of 30'. Parking St�zsctaa�e.r (2001) also acknowledges that the recommended cross-over aisle width dimension can be reduced 3 feet if traffic flow is low for concentric conditions, lo�vering the t�vo-way concentric standard for a LOS of C to 25'-0". 2. A foomote associated with Table 3-4 in Par,�ing Str�ctures (200�), footnote 3, states "Clear between face of columns: add 3 ft (1 m) from face of column to back of first stall per Figure 3-4. A typogYaphical error was made in the Figure number - it should be Figure 3-5. That „ note is not clear. The 3 ft referred to is between the face of the column and the inboard spaces by the ramps, not the face of the column and the cars parked in the end bay. Looking at Figure 3-5, Two Way with 90° parkuig, the 3 ft is toward the (SCO) stalls. Another typographical error is dimensioned by the (SCO) stalls as 3'-6", not 3'-0". 3. The garage is for residential patrons who will becoine familiar with its size and shape very quickly and we do not perceive that there will be a large numbers of visitors at the garage. 4. The facitity uses the very familiar single thxead helix design with a standard 90 degree parking module for two-way traffic flow. It should be familiar to parkers. 5. For this use, it is not uncommon to see a LOS D design even though the LOS C is more comfortable. For LOS D, the dimensions being considered drop to 26'-6" for centric patterns and to 29'-0" for non-concentric.. Based on our review, we feel that the parking structure will serve its patrons well as designed. The 26'-10" lane provided is 1'-10" wider than the 25'-0" LOS C calculated in Bullet 1 above. For this particular facility, we feel it appropriate to grant a variance from the Town minimum width requirement of 30'. In support of this position, we feel that user characteristics may mandate some flexibility in the geometry to maximize efficiencies of the parking facility. The resident owners or renters do not require much more than a parking stall. If its geometry is smaller than some they have seen and used in shopping centers or office buildings, they will adapt and accept the exisring conditions. Finally, we applied turning templates to the end-bay and show that vehicles will have acceptable maneuverability with the facility as currently designed. We have enclosed the turning radius document for your informarion. It is significant to know we used a 19'-0" long vehicle, not the usual 17'-1" vehicle cited in the Parking Structures (2001) book. If you would like clarification on any issues, please call (303355.1069) or send an email: pmack@p arkingconsultantsllc. com. Very truly yours, Pa.w(. i�. M a.c.k, Paul D. Mack, PE President Enclosure: Drawing of the garage end-bay with a turning-radius template applied. 3400 E Bayaud Avenue, Suite 300 • Denver CO 80209 • 303355.1069 • www.parkingconsultantsllc.com � - �. TOWN 0� VAIl� � D [�C�C �MC �ov 1 � Zo» ��i Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator Major Subdivision Review Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commission General Information: This application is for a request to subdivide more than four (4) lots, or a subdivision proposal without all lots having frontage on a public, approved street, or with a request to extend Municipal facilities in a signifi- cant manner, or a proposal which would negatively affect the natural environment as determined under Section 12-12-2 of the Town Code or if the proposal would adversely affect the development of the remainder of the parcel or the adja- cent property. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall conduct a public hearing on an application for Major Subdivision and give recommendation to the Town Council on said Subdivision. Please see Section 13-3, Major Subdi- visions, Vail Town Code for more detailed information. Vail Town Code can be found on the Town's website at www.vailgov.com. The proposed project may also require other permits or applications and/or review by the Design Review Board and/or Town Council. Fee: $1500 + $20 per plated lot on of the Request: �U�A; Physical Address: � _..cel Number: Property Owner: I � � .� � `Tra�- Ic�3 i � 1 oS� ';_� i17r1 '� v I (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) ,� Mailing Address: .� .�� " �-��'�-� �`� �"` VC4'r I � �C� [��b � 7 Phone: l ! � ` � 7 ��f � � Owner's Signature: Primary Contactl Owner Representative: �i "In �~`^ � �' � � � ^-7 p Mailing Address: � / � � � � C < < `� � / " ! �� Phone: � �.S— g�� 33 33 E-MaiL• C�AA �'�e Fax: t IS "�� 7' �� 1! � �'e�a.� � C.t�or�� : Cc�,�►� � v � q- �� For OfFce Use Only: Cash CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Exp. Date: Auth # Check # Fee Paid: � Meeting Date: � �• � �- � ( Planner: " �oning: T�ouS��`W .,cation of the Proposal: Lot: Block: Received From: PEC No.: ��C �JQ�� Project No: Land Use: Subdivision: J 9 � �xr..�. �� TaWN OF VAIl. � JOINT PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER The applicant must submit written joint property owner approval for applications affecting shared ownership properties such as duplex, condominium, and multi-tenant buildings. This form, or similar written correspondence, must be com- pleted by the adjoining duplex unit owner or the authorized agent of the home owner's association in the case of a con- dominium or multi-tenant building. All completed forms must be submitted with the applicants completed application. i, (print name) of property located at a joint owner, or authority of the association, provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvements to be compieted at the address not- ed above. I understand that the proposed improvements include: (Signature) Additionally, please check the statement below which is most applicable to you: (Date) I understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review process to ensure compli- ance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations. (lnitial here) 1 understand that all modifications, minor or ofherwise, which are made to the plans over the course of the review pro- cess, be brought to my attention by the applicant for additional approval before undergoing further review by the Town. � � (Initial here) �� `� �� x. �� I � �� ; �;1 � � � � � F �� I �� TOWN OF VAIL � �i;; NOV 14 2011 ��I�.�� ''' �� _� _ ..�?WN OF �HIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970-479-2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator Development Plan Application for Review by the Planning and Environmental Commission General Information: This application is required for the establishment or the amendment to an approved development plan. The establishment or an amendment of a development plan may be required for new construction, change in use or redevelopment on parcels that are within the following Zoning Districts or as determined by the Administrator: Gen- eral Use (GU) District (Section 12-9C, VaiV Town Code), Ski Base/ Recreation (SBR) District (Section 12-8D, Vail Town Code) and Ski Base/ Recreation 2(SBR2) District (Section 12-8E, Vail Town Code). Sections of the Vail Town Code may be found on the Town website at www.vailqov.com. The proposed project may also require other permits or applica- tions and/or review by the Design Review Board and/or the Town Council. Fee: $1500—Establishment of a development plan _$250—Amendment to an approved development plan Description of the Request: Amendment to previously approved Timber Ridqe Development Plan C,T�(1� CcO.�S�Vc'�" �'��1��= C�l �S (�, �c; �� C�►{�'� �� f i a� ccr, Physical Address: 1280 North Frontaqe Road .�rcel Number: 210312105008 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Property Owner: Timber Ridqe Affordable Housinq Corporation Mailing Address: 75 South Frontaqe Road Vail CO 81657 Phone: 970-479-2144 Owner's Signature: Primary ContacU Owner Representative: Vail Timber Ridqe LLC Mailing Address: 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive EI Paso TX 79912 Phone: 915-877-333 E-Mail: Todd Fereday <TFeredavC�cfiordan.com> Fax: 915-877-3999 For Office Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Fee Paid: Wta�VE� Received From: �UO4-DOo� Auth # Check # Meeting Date: PEC No.: Y� C L 1�, a1L ��°I Planner: '� Project No: i"�� ' ��D -L Zoning: Land Use: .ocation of the Proposal: Lot: �'S Block: � Subdivision: o �1l-1 �T� � O1-Aug-11 �II C) � �� v Buildinq Materials Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting Other PROPOSED MATERIALS Tvpe of Material see attached drawinas for specific material and color leqends. Color Notes: Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. � �v$ �,� �� PROPOSED LANDSCAPING Botanical Name Common Name Quantit Size PROPOSED TREES Piease see attached drawings for material information AND SHRUBS EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED �1linimum Requirements for Landscaping: Deciduous Trees — 2" Caliper Coniferous Trees — 6' in height Shrubs — 5 Gal. Tvqe Sauare Footaae GROUND COVER SOD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL Please specify other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) �- � � J TIMBER RIDGE AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION NOVEMBER 14 2011 �r� � • ��5 �� W-�� 1�uG1� • d0'sg �8t1• os65 . .._I ]-�^-I. I� �J f -.:� S ..�_�C�, I� �� , ,�:. ;I _ tl��`' NOV 14 �011 � % � a �foVV�i oF i%A�L. ,� � �. a � � � � i r� + ' � . ,� ti TIMBER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NOVEMBER 14, 2011 Anplicant Vail Timber Ridge LLC 7700 C.F. Jordan Drive EI Paso, Texas Project Architect Humphreys and Partners Architects 5339 Alpha Road Suite 300 Dallas, Texas Consulting Architect Victor Mark Donaldson Architects 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard # 207 Avon, Colorado Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, Colorado Land Plannin� . Pylman & Associates, Inc. 137 Main Street, C107W Edwards, Colorado � � r�e . s R + Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 2 S ., d � ,� ,,,.�� s' ,� � ►�J 1.0 1.1 2.0 3.0 3.1 4.0 5.0 6.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Summary of Request Existing Development Plan Approval Proposed Amendment to Approved Plan Detailed Zoning Analysis Housing District Criteria far Evaluation Current Conditions of Approval Summary �_ Tables Unit Tabulation Chart Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 1 1 2 3 3 7 11 12 6 3 � �� ,,<�� `'�� I � 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Summary of Request The purpose of this application is to provide information relative to a request for an amendment to an existing Development Plan approval for the proposed re-development of 5.24 acres of the existing Timber Ridge apartments. Timber Ridge is located at 1280 North Frontage Road. The legal description for the property is Lots 1 thorough 5, a resubdivision of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Block C, Town of Vail, C0. The Town of Vail Zoning map designates Timber Ridge as Housing District (H). Development within the Housing District must receive Development Plan approval in accordance with the parameters and review criteria described in Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code. This application contains the information required by Chapter 12.61 of the Vail Municipal Code to review and approve this application. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 1 �� ;� � ,�<� 6°�. � ,,� 4� ;:� `�� 2.0 Existing Development Plan approval Timber Ridge was constructed in 1981 and remains the largest employee housing complex in the Town of Vail. The ten-acre site includes 198 two bedroom, one bath rental units in sixteen buildings. Each unit is 745 square feet in size. The Town of Vail purchased Timber Ridge for $20 million in July of 2003. In July of 2007, anticipating a redevelopment of the properry, the Town rezoned Timber Ridge to the Housing (H) District. In December of 2008 the Town issued a Request for Proposals seeking interested and qualified development teams to redevelop approximately one half of the property. This process led to the selection of the Vail Timber Ridge LLC team. A development agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Timber Ridge LLC was entered into in October of 2009. The development agreement stipulates a redevelopment of the eastern half of the ten acre site and stipulated that Vail Timber Ridge LLC deliver 359 EHU's capable of housing a total of 570 beds. A Timber Ridge Development Plan application was submitted to the Town of Vail in January of 2010 and after a public open house process and several Planning Commission hearings the application was approved by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission on March 22, 2010. The PEC review process resulted in changes to the building design that improved the ground level site plan, site circulation and pedestrian scale design elements. Slightly rearranging the upper level building mass also resulted in revised rooflines that allowed for a greater variation in the building height. These revisions all resulted in an approval of a slightly reduced density of 352 Employee Housing Units and 520 parking spaces. The PEC action included approval of the proposed development plan and approval of a retaining wall height variance, and also included nine conditions of approval, which will be outlined later in this document. Upon PEC approval the project proceeded to the Design Review Board and on August 4 of 2010 the DRB granted final design review approval, with associated conditions. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 2 November 1, 2011 � �°� ''t�d r::+,� 3.0 Proposed Amendments to Approved Plan The proposed Timber Ridge project financing involves a very detailed and involved US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) review process. The outcome of that intensive review process has been a requirement to lower the density of the proposed development. The Town of Vail approved Development Plan is currently for 352 units totaling 544 bedrooms. The HUD financing approval limits the proposed plan to 279 units. This has necessitated a fairly straightforward re-design of the approved development plan. The lower density has been achieved by, in simple terms, eliminating one entire floor from the mid level of the approved five-story building. This includes removing one level from the approved five level parking garage. This re-design strate,gy allows the project to meet the HUD financing requirements while maintaining the integrity and spirit of the Town of Vail PEC and DRB approvals. No site revisions are required or proposed, other than some minor re-grading on the north side of the building along the lowered parking structure. The overall appearance and form of the PEC and DRB approvals is maintained. Building materials and colors have been slightly rearranged to match the reduced bulk and mass of the building scale and to coordinate with direction previously received from the DRB pertaining to the appropriate assemblage and proportion of the range of building materials and colors. The site plan, including vehicle circulation, surface parking, bike and pedestrian paths, fire lane design, courtyard designs, the enhanced bus stop and the landscape plan for the front of the building remain intact and unchanged. The ground level and first floor plans remain as approved, with a 7,900 foot athletic clubhouse, and the building entries, lobby and mail box area remain unchanged. The entire roofline has been lowered by one full story. This includes lowering the five level parking structure to a four level structure. All roof forms remain exactly as approved. There is no change to the utility service plans or to site drainage plans. 3.1 Detailed Zoning Analysis The stated intent of the Housing District is to ensure that employee housing , is appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents of Vail, � .$ Y. � Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 3 November 1, 2011 �� to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate light, air and open spaces. There are no changes proposed to the existing approval for Permitted Uses, Conditional Uses, Setbacks, Site Coverage, Landscaping and Site Development Standards, or Lot Area and Site Dimensions. There are revisions to the following standards: Parking, Building Height and Density Control. Parkin The Housing District, in recognition of the unique nature and characteristics of employee housing, allows for, at the discretion of the planning and environmental commission, a reduction of up to a maximum of 25% of the parking requirements outlined in Chapter 10 of the Vail Land Use Code. This reduction may be is based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than required by Town Code. The current Timber Ridge Development Plan approval is for 352 units and 520 parking spaces, which represents a reduction of approximately 22% from the standard town requirements. The basis for allowing this reduction in the development plan approval was the significant improvements proposed to the bus stop located on the Timber Ridge site and the high level of transit service planned for this location. The current bus stop is little more than a wide spot at the edge of the Frontage Road. The proposed improved bus stop is physically separated from the roadway and has room to accommodate several buses at once. The amended plan proposes 279 units. There are 17 units less than 500 square feet in size and 262 units greater than 500 square feet. This equates to a parking requirement of 550 parking spaces. The amended plan includes a total of 424 parking spaces. Of these spaces 419 are located within the parking garage and 5 are exterior surface parking spaces. There are 77 compact spaces and 9 handicap designated spaces. This total of 424 spaces represents a 22% reduction from the Town of Vail standards. While the overall unit and parking numbers have both decreased the requested reduction from the Town of Vail standards remains at 22%, less than the 25% allowable and consistent with the current approval. Building Height The approved building includes 3, 4 and 5 story elements and steps vertically with the site grade on both the east-west and north-south axes. The highest � ridgeline measures at 76 feet, 9.5 inches above grade with several '� Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 4 � November 1, 2011 � � architectural projections extending above this height. The rear five story element measures at 70 feet,10.5 inches above grade. The proposed amendments drop the entire building down by one floor. The proposed building now consists primarily of three and four-story elements with a small area of two-story massing located at the eastern end of the building. Density Control In October of 2009 Timber Ridge LLC and the Town of Vail entered into a development agreement that outlines the parameters of the proposed redevelopment of the 5.24-acre portion of Timber Ridge. This agreement stipulates a density of 359 Employee Housing Units capable of housing 570 beds. Minor changes in building massing and height through the initial development plan review process resulted in a minor density reduction to this number. The density approved by the PEC currently stands at 352 Employee Housing Units. The proposed density of the amended plan is 279 Employees Housing Units and a total of 431 beds. A unit tabulation chart detailing unit type, size and count follows this page. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 5 �� ;n� � ;� �� `� s �i fi/ �J � VAIL TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TABULATION UNIT NAME UNIT TYPE NET AREA(SF) Occup. Load1200 GRFA (SF� UNIT COUNT % TOTAL NET # BEDS A1 STUDIO 391 2.0 393 17 6.09% 6,647 17 A2 1 brl1 ba 527 2.6 530 80 28.67% 42,160 g� A3 1 brl1 ba 647 3.2 650 30 10.75% 19,410 3d B1 (AND ALT 1,2,5,6) 2br/2ba 782 3.9 786 51 18.28% 39,882 102 B1 (AND ALT3,4,7) 2brl2ba 812 4.1 816 21 7.53% 17,052 42 62 (AND ALT. 2) 2brl2ba 893 4.5 895 32 11.47% 28,576 64 B3 (AND ALT 8,10,) 2brl2ba 969 4.8 973 29 10.39% 28,101 63 ALT 1,2,3,7,9 2brl2ba 926 4.6 931 11 3.94% 10,186 58 B4 (AND ALT.1) 2brl2ba 842 4.2 849 8 2.87% 6,736 22 16 TOTALS 279 100.0% 198,750 431 � � � � c � a � v � �. 0 a� > � A � a� > O i. � a. d 0 c � �c � � � ¢ a� on b oG c. � .a � F � � 0 N e--i �. a� � � � 0 z 4.0 Housing District Criteria for Evaluation The Housing District describes six criteria that shall be used by the staff and planning and environmental commission as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. For the purposes of this application for amendment to an approved development plan the applicant response below compares the amended plan to the current approved plan. Those criteria and the applicant's response to each follows below: A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. Applicant's response: The amendment to the approved development plan reduces the proposed density from 352 EHU's to 279 EHU's. This represents a reduction of 20% of the unit count and is a substantial reduction in the bulk and mass of the building. The strategy of revising the building by lowering the height by one full story reduces the scale of the building while maintaining the site design elements that were so carefully crafted through the previous review and approval process. As the previous plan was found to be compatible with this finding the proposed amendment should further the compatibility of the building design with the adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. The elements of the original design that were important to this finding all remain intact. The proposed Timber Ridge plan provides improvements that have been specifically designed to produce a functional development plan. A tremendous amount of parking is hidden from public view by a four level parking garage. Unit access and pedestrian circulation occurs primarily within the enclosed building. Unit floor plans remain unchanged, and remain functional and livable. Laundry facilities remain in each individual unit. The clubhouse plan remains unchanged. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 7 � � .:. � �� ,� � �� };� � � The site itself remains be the best available high density residential employee housing opportunity in the Town of Vail. Frontage Road and transit stop improvements are responsive to the site and the neighborhood. The building massing on the east end is meant to be responsive to the only residential neighbor. The lowering of the building improves this relationship. C. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. The 10-acre Timber Ridge site is currently home to 198 two-bedroom apartment units in 16 buildings, with extensive surface parking and site retaining walls. The proposed redevelopment site of 5.24 acres includes 106 of those existing units. The existing development has already impacted the original natural features of this site. The proposed plan does maximize opportunities for access and use by the resident public by the design of the courryard spaces. The courtyard design performs the dual function of providing a significant break in the front fa�ade of the building and also, in response to this criterion, provides a location for functional and aesthetic public spaces. The courtyards have varied landscape design themes that include a plaza for intimate public gathering spots, barbecue and fire pit areas and outdoor spas. The work session format with the planning and environmental commission, along with staff input, has resulted in revisions to the project that are extremely beneficial to the landscape design. Previous plans included a 24-foot wide driveway with parallel parking spaces all along the front of the building. This resulted in a significant width of asphalt and a difficult landscape design problem. The current approved plans have reduced this large expanse of asphalt to a combined bike path and emergency vehicle access lane. This change in vehicular circulation had opened up more area available for landscape planting and results in a much improved landscape design. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan $ November 1, 2011 �, ��,�� Overall the landscape design represents a tremendous improvement over existing conditions and provides a very functional and meaningful open space and landscape design. The proposed amendments to the plan were carefully designed to eliminate any affect on the approved site and landscape plan. D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. Timber Ridge is located along the North Frontage Road and the town bicycle and pedestrian path has been designed to pass through the site on Timber Ridge property. The bike path through the site will also serve as an emergency vehicle access. Sidewalks along the building provide access to all entryways and connect to the bike path and to the adjacent bus stop. Vehicular access and circulation is direct and efficient. The North Frontage Road will be improved with acceleration and deceleration turn lanes at the primary vehicular access to the parking garage. Cars will enter the site and directly access the centrally located parking garage. A second vehicular access is shared with the bus stop and provides access to the remainder of the existing Timber Ridge units and to surface parking spaces that will serve short term, business office and drop off needs. Again, the proposed amendment to the approved development plan does not affect in any way the approved pedestrian and circulation plan. E. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identi�ed in the project's environmental impact report, if not waived, and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. A full environmental impact report has been completed for the proposed project and evaluated as a part of the design process. The recommend mitigation measures include improvements to the = North Frontage Road to allow for appropriate turning movements and � ,,� Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 9 November 1, 2011 C � � - several alternative rockfall mitigation options. The applicant and the Town of Vail will work together towards the final design and implementation of these mitigation measures. The 20% reduction in unit count lessens any impacts and improves the already approved mitigation measures. F. Compliance with the Vail comprehensive plan and other application plans. The proposed amendment to the project density does not have any effect upon the previous consideration of compliance with the comprehensive plan. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 10 w�� w. .L kli. :^4 A" ri'7Li/ �� z� &� '� � � 1� 5.0 Current Conditions of Approval The March 22, 2010 PEC Development Plan approval included nine conditions of approval. A few of those conditions have been addressed through the DRB process or through further rockfall analysis and a decision to pursue an alternative mitigation strategy. The remainder of those conditions may and should be carried forward with this amended application. For the purpose of this application narrative the assumption is that Town of Vail Communiry Development Department staff will revise and carry forward conditions as appropriate in their staff report to the Planning Commission. Therefore the previous individual conditions have not been repeated or specifically addressed in this narrative. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan November 1, 2011 11 � �_�� ! � r ��;� �� •. � � � 0 6.0 Summary The Town of Vail has determined, through the 2008 Employee Housing Strategic Plan, that the policy of the Town of Vail will be "To ensure there is deed restricted housing for at least 30% of Vail's workforce within the Town of Vail. This goal will be met by policies and actions that (1) ensure new development keeps up with this goal, and (2) development projects sponsored by or in partnership with the Town to "catch up" to meet this 30% goal. The Town has initiated several actions. The buy down program and the Town actions to construct low density deed restricted ownership units will continue to provide great ownership opportunities to local families. In order to really make progress in the "catch up" arena a project of significant density is necessary. The Timber Ridge site has the physical and locational attributes to allow for this site to be the best opportunity for the Town of Vail to create a significant increase in deed restricted beds within the community. Vail Timber Ridge LLC believes that we ha�e addressed the program request of the Vail Town Council with a building and site design that is appropriate to the location and the neighborhood and meets all of the criteria required for Housing District Development Plan approval. This proposed redevelopment of a portion of Timber Ridge will provide a tremendous community benefit. The proposed density reduction that is the subject of this amended development plan application is a direct requirement of the lending program. Although this application reduces the number of units and beds available on site the overall project still provides a tremendous benefit to the community. Timber Ridge Amendment to Approved Development Plan 12 November 1, 2011 � �� FX I LUMINAIRE° PX-300, PX-600, PX-900 .+.,�;�. �.'� � �� .; -- .= � �- = � °'.�-.."� � � ..�. : � � �_ � � r.r� �+s+•..�"' . � � .� �'? 4'�v Y � . .__ .,_ . _ :ix'.....,.. .. ... . � L H � �Y 1 ,r y f � Z �:'c. � '�� ^� �; °_ ?j +�.r � ��' S t �_� .,�. . _ �_ M POWER Hc D j� � � � �%% � CONTROL LCi �l � NOV 14 2011 � �R TOWN OF VAIL 0 _., � , POWER Hc � CONTROL � SAFE, COMPLIANT AND INNOVATIVE This is the high tech heart of the FX Luminaire� low voltage lighting system. The patented PX is available in 300, 600 and 900 watt capacities with a variety of control options. The endosure is fabricated from heavy gauge stainless steel for long life in corrosive esterior locations. A critical function of a transformer is to supply the halogen lamps with a constant non-fluctuating voltage current to prevent premature lamp bumout. Any well designed lighting system starts with a solid power supply that will provide safe, dean power to energy-efficient components — the FX PotenzaX� is engineered for the task. �� An important consideration in designing a lighting system is how � it will be actuated. FX offers open switching control architecture. Use any standard timer, photocell, manual switch or "smart home" device to control the transformer. INSTALLATION FLEXIBILITY Over I b years ago, FX introduced the industry's frst multi-tap landscape lighting transformer. The mulu-tap (eature allows the field installer co compensate for voltage bss from different cable run lengths, diereby balanang the system for high performance and maximum lamp life. The longer the run, the higher the initial voltage co compensote for voltage loss. FX continues to be the industry innovator by introducing the SuperBloX� terminal. This patented component allows the installer to safely connect the field wires to the ¢ower supply and provides I 20 volt switching control oplions that are unmatched. Speci�y the cutring edge r�,pcWver supplies — the FX PotenzaX�! U.S. Patents No. 6,443,783; 6,497,592 Other patents pending. 7.50" �� °o .o otI o a� 0 o X m � � o � o � �., — 02009 FX LUMINAIRE� 800-688-1269 www.FXL.com� O The PX comes in Stainless Steel (SS), and your choice of Cord and/or Timer and/or Photocell. �.., ••. _ • . • • .•. Kr= _' � andlor `-. 1 andlor � + 300 {� +Q = PX-300-T Cord Timer Photocell Stainless Steel ..................................................................................................................................................................................... STANDARD OPTIONS: I+ 2+ 3 ORDERED TOGETHER ON SAME LINE AVAILABLE CONFIGURATIONS: FIXTURE/CODE WATTAGE/CODE DESCRIPTION pX 300-C 300•T � 0 300-PC 300-TPC 600-C 600-T 600-PC 600-TPC 900-C 900-T 900-PC 900-TPC With 3' power cord With 3' power cord and internal Timer With 3' power cord and PhotoCell With 3' power cord and PhotoCell and internal Timer With 3' power cord With 33' power cord and internal Timer With 33' power cord and PhotoCell With 33' power cord and PhotoCell and internal Timer With 33' power cord With 3' power cord and internal Timer With 3' power cord and PhotoCell With 3' power cord and PhotoCell and internal Timer ..•. •• • Stainless Steel is standard. All other choices must be specified. •. . • Switching control is one of the most important tasks the lighling designer must �' �r "'! � address in order to have the system �'t 'b'4«; ' the owner's li(esryle and ualiry needs. To � � allow jor the widest creative control, FX '-- �' has designed the PotenmX�� with an open �� architecture jor switching controls. This allows the specifer to irKOrporate o wide vanery o( electro-mxhanical or digital controls that con even tie in the landxape lighting to a full home automation system. � Products such as the Leviton�> Decora � Home Controls or X-10 will woric well � with the PotenzoXv Transformer. These `�.. S : components can be eosily installed into � : new or remodeled projects as they use � the existing house winng to transmit signals. If you have a shorp job site electncion, he/she can utilize the PotenmXt� �' SuperBloX terminal to create man- ual overrides or three-woy switching. �_ For lorger projects, such as resorts, the PX con be in-line mounted and wired in-senes with o central timer and/or phomcell. I gs Stainless Steel I: No other trons(ormer manufocturer of�ers the professional ; lighting designer this wide range o(switching options. 70 leam : more about this important topic, and to pnnt ou[ a dient : switching questionnaire jorm in order to help you discover their t needs, visit our website at www.FXLcom • • .• • Allow extra time for the following finish options: _ //i \' I _ BZ DG BF VF SB WF WI Bronze Meullic Deserc Granite Black Wrinkle Verde Speckle Sedona Brown White Wrinkle Weathered Iron Pool & Spa '"� , ,..� 379 ETL Listed to UL Srandards For Safeq: ��dscape ugnc�og Power Supply ETL 1838 LANDSCAPE � 838 % ETL 379 POOL & SPA �y,, � : For high performance and predictable lamp life use FX : LUMINAIRE� Transformers only. The FX PX is specifi- : cally designed for the high tech lamps used in our fixtures —the use of inferior power supplies can cause premature � lamp failure and other problems including the risk of fire. ; For more information on this very important subject ; please conuct us at 800-688- I 269 or on the web, for the � booklet entitled "Undersunding UL Listing Standards for : Low Voltage Landscape Lighting." � �02009 FX LUMINAIRE� 800-688-1269 www.FXL.com� � FX I LUMINAIRE° RS-20, RS-3 5 UPLIGHTING ARCHITECTURAL ENTRY TREES ACCENTS MONUMENTS \\ � J �� , � UPLIGHTING MULTIPLE LIGHTING POSSIBILITIES The ReflectoreStellato� is a rugged micro luminaire that provides the power and control of the halo- gen MR-16 lamp family. This pat- ent pending, precision lighting instrument is a fine example of engineering for simplicity and reliability. Through the use of an O-ring hydraulic compression cap seal, the potentially troublesome threads and screws found in other spodights are eliminated. The ReflectoreStellato� is con- structed without compromise using aerospace grade alloys and silicone seals. Because of its high efficiency, beam control, color rendition and availability, the MR-1 G lamp family was chosen to power this luminaire. With this broad range of illuminating possibilities the lighting designer can find an FX solution to most e�cterior lighting tasks. Note: This fixture is designed for upl3ghting only. J 1A/ 0 � �n �02009 FX LUMINAIRE� 800-688-1269 www.FXL.com� � RS comes sundard with a 20 watt MR-16 Halogen lamp, Clear or Frosted Lens (specify F after wattage, EX: RS-20-F-BZ.), Super Slot Spike�', and any finish. .••.• •'• 1 . . . . .•. or � � * .;� + � = RS-20-BZ '� � : � m = HB ,�*' Halogen MR-16 Clear Lens Frosted Lens Super Slot = CDS s ecif F Spike� ..................................................................................................................................................................................... STANDARD OPTIONS: NON-STANDARD OPTIONS: �+ 2+ 3 ORDERED TOGETHER ON SAME LINE A, B AND C MUST BE ORDERED ON SEPARATE LINE! ..-. . . •.. . . •. .• . Choose from any watt Halogen (H). : Does not come pre-assembled with glare control, they will arrive in separate box. .. . . •• •. • , � . � • � � HB HexBaffle� RS 20 watt Halogen, wide, 20H 36° beam, Avg. life 5000 hours; now available in 10000 hours (�) 20V-H z0 watt Halogen, very narrow. 10° beam, Avg. life 4000 hours ••� • •' • 35 watt Halogen, wide, � Comes pre-assembled with a clear lens. All others will arrive in separate box. 35H 36° beam, Avg. life 5000 hours: now available in 10000 hours (�ew) •. . • . Some lamps are by special order. Please check with our factory for availability. ... • . .• • .• • : Comes pre-assembled with Super Slot Spike�. : All other mounting options will arrive in separate box. Allow extra time for the following finish options: •• � • �� S SO CF- I CF-2 CF-3 CF-4 �� :�� '� � BZ DG BF VF SB WF WI Bronze Meullic Desert Granite Black Wrinkle Verde Speckle Sedona Brown White Wrinkle Weathered Iron �4 CDS SJ PM Spread Lens Solite Lens Peach Lens Blue Lens Green Lens Red Lens CapannaDiNoce� 2.00" x 10.00" SuperJ-boX� 2.50" x I 2.00" PostMount`e' 2.50" x 13.00 � �02009 FX LUMINAIRE� 800-688-1269 www.FXL.com� d FX I LUMINAIRE° � LM-20 , ��;s;� �' � �� r �: � � i� .. � ,: y , � � �,s �. � PERFECTION EVERY TIME The Patent Pending LevelX� system allows � � ° � � the composite sleeve to be up to 3/ 8" out of LEVEL ¢ level, in either direction, while still allowing the foceplate to be laser level.� The secret The trim attaches ro the adjustable reflector assembly — no[ the composite sleeve or body. Heavy joam gasket keeps light spill to 0 � o � � o minimum. LEVEL `�' STAIRWAY LIGHTING PERIMETER LIGHTING \ WALL LIGHTING COMMERCIAL QUALITY, RESIDENTIAL PRICE POINT The patent pending LM is engi- neered to bring light to areas such as walkways, stairways and decks as well as to other foot uaffic hazards that don't have an adjacent planter area for pathlighting or trees and uellis from which to downlight. Incorporated into the design is the LevelX� feature. The LevelX� assures the lighting installer that the faceplates of these permanent- ly mounted fixtures will remain perfectly level upon completion of the installation. Many step and wall lights on the market today are designed so that if the mounting box is installed out-of-level, the face- plate, once installed, will also be noticeably out-of-level. Some of the features of the LM indude: Sleeve is permanendy mounted in concrete or wood wall combined with multiple threaded knockouts, easy-to-remove box for unforeseen future problems prevents having to chip away at the wall for repairs, and corrosion-free stainless steel inserts. �� , � 3� S � �I � 0 � a 3)sry v � SLEEVE FACEPLATE �02009 FX LUMINAIRE� 800-688-1269 www.FXL.com� � The LM comes standard with two 10 watt Xenon G4 and a Copper faceplate. -- . . . • • • . � _:�' + ,;r' + � = LM-20-CU Xenon G4 Copper .................................................................... STANDARD OPTIONS: �+ Z+ 3 ORDERED TOGETHER ON SAME LINE • • Your choice of lamp will come pre-installed. _ L . _ � �� ._--z.�--'": . • �: 10,000 Copper is sundard. All other choices must be specified. .. . . CU Copper (will naturalfy pa[ina) . . .• . . . Allow extra time for the following finish options: ��. , ,�:^r `'�� . �� BZ DG BF VF 5B WP WI NP Bronze Meullic Deserc Granite Black Wrinkle Verde Speckle Sedona Brown White Wrinkle Weathered Iron Nickel Plate i : wall ¢ _.�.__ � � Distance from Center LM-20 I' 4.3 2' 1.3 3' .50 4' .25 5' .18 6' .12 For conversion to lumens: Multiply fooccandles x 10. See FX glossary for a full description of fc and lumens. m' �02009 FX LUMINAIRE� 800-688-1269 www.FXL.com� � , ., . ''`•, _ >�,x,; � "``��. � } -. - , . _. ��•� :,;;;� I ��„�.`� ��,'`"� � SteeLog Artistic Metals Vt��t ��M�� .� � �" � �'�:�� ;` �� s� �� : �:. .r�; "��' ;�� ,•ta. � , � . � :� � . � �� '"�.�'e .i�� ° ° �i . �° > Copper Mountain Ski Resort, Colorado. Copyright 2005 SteeLOg Artistic Metals - All rights reserved. http://www. steelog. com/popups/p480_032.htm1 Page 1 of 1 11/13/2011 � 6„ � II III 4z° BRA6 [75 WATT MAX.] � 8�� r— (�� 4 z" BRA8 [100 WATT MAX.] �; � _.�......�,.. . r. �_�.._. �_,a,~�~ �.�� ,_,�_ �. . ....,.,... �.._.. . " �.�.,....e. �,._.._. . . . W,«�....�. .�..�-.� °......�,....,��. �...�---.,. �.�.—.�.. . �..,� .�..�..—_ . ,...w., �..--,-,_... , �� „,„.�, �, _ SPECIFICATIDNS HOU5ING: HEAVY WALL EXTRUOE❑ ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. TOP CAP: OURABLE. CORROSION RESISTANT CAST ALUMINUM CONSTRLJCTION. OPTICAL TRAIN: [TR) INJECTION MOL❑EO ACRYLIC LENS. 1/4" WALL THICKNESS. LENS SURROUNOS CLEAR ANO�IZE❑ TWIN REFLECTOR SYSTEM. OPTIONS: (IL ] CLEAR ACRYLIC LENS SURROUNOS ANOOIZE❑ ALUMINUM LOLJVER TRAIN. (CL] OURABLE. CORROSI❑N RESISTANT CAST ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM PR❑VIOES 30° CUT-OFF FOR BRIGHTNESS CONTROL. INTERNAL CLEAR GLASS CYLIN�ER SLJRROUNOS LAMP. (PG] CLEAR ACRYLIC LENS SURROUNOS PRISMATIC GLASS REFRACTOR. (WA) OPAL ACRYLIC LENS. GASKETING: CL❑SEO CELL SILICONE. LAMP HOLOER: ME❑IUM BASE PORCELAIN. LAMP: [BY OTHERS] BALLA5T: H.P.F./C.W.A. AUTOTRANSFORMER, -2❑° STARTING TEMPERATLJRE. ELECTRICAL C�MPONENTS ARE MOUNTED TO REM❑VABLE BALLAST TRAY FOR MAINTENANCE EASE. BALLAST EqUIPPED WITH FACTORY INSTALLE❑ qUICK OISCONNECT PLlJ6. BASE PLATE: PRECISE ❑NE PIECE CAST ALLJMINUM CONSTRUCTION. ANCHOR PLATE IS MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO HOUSING. ANCHORA6E: [4J 3/B"XIO" FULLY GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS EACH SUPPLIE❑ WITH TWO NUTS AND TWO WASHERS. FIN15H: POLYESTER POWOER COAT-STATE OF THE ART 2O PSI PRESSURE POWER WASH AT 140° TEMPERATLJRE INCORPORATES F❑LJR STEP IRDN PHDSPHATE PROCESS TO CLEANSE AN� PRETREAT THE METAL SURFACE FOR MAXIMUM PAINT AOHESION. ELECTROSTATICALLY APPLIE� TEXTURE� POLYESTER POWOER TOPCOAT IS BAKEO AT 400° TEMPERATURE F❑R MAXIMUM HAR�NESS UL U.L. Listedfor AN❑ EXTERIOR �URABILITY. � wetlocaGon OPTICS STANDARD: ❑ �TR� TWIN REFLECTOR Sl1PPLIEO WITH CLEAR ACRYLIC LENS OPTIONS: BRA � MODEL NO. : � � � � [��l INTERNAL LOLIVER SLIPPLIEO WITH CLEAR ACRYLIC LENS � ([L) CAST LOUVER H.i.o. uwrs SLIPPLIEO WITH INTERNAL 6LA55 OIFFUSER FWORESCENT t1NIT5 SUPPLIEO WITH INTERNAL POLYCARBONATE OIFFLISER � [PG] PRISMATIC GLA55 SIJPPLIEO WITH CLEAR ACRVLIC LENS , � tWAI OPAL ACRYLIC WALL MOUNT STYLE BRA6-9"i 'F BRA8-1�" 17" z4° EXTRUDEO ALUMINUM ARM AND CAST ALLJMINLJM WALL BRACKET ASSEMBLY PROVIOEO WITH BUILT IN GASKETEO WIRE ACCESS FOR FIXTURE/SUPPLY WIRE C❑NNECTI�N. WALL PLATE � ,� T 7' S0. —f;t— 5l'/z" � I 1 �5 ��z�� (4] HOILES OPTICS ■ WATTAGE TYPE VOLTAGE ■ MOUNTING OPTICS LAMP MOUNTING STANDAAD: WATTAGE TYPE VOLTAGE GROUNDINSTALLATION TWIN REFLECTOR 6�� p�A TR ❑100* ❑HPS ❑120 OPTIONS: ��5 ❑ MH ❑277 INTERNAL LOUVER � 70 ❑ MV ❑ MT IL ❑50 � PL CASTALUMINUMLOUVER �42 ❑ INC CL ❑ 35 PRISMATIC GLASS TYPE V PG-V ❑ 26 PRISMATIC GLASS TYPE III � � 8 PG-Iil ❑ 13 OPAL ACRYLIC WA *AVAILABLE WITH 8" BOLLARD ONLY BULLARO 4' DIA. BOLT CIRCLE ( x �I 6" f�- DIA. 9" DIA. BOLLARD 6" DIA. BOLT CIRCLE � O � 8" oia. ANCHOR BOLT (4) 3/8' X 10' � LAMP 51ZE: 13 - 100 WATT 42" en 4z" BRA6 BRAB [75 W. MAX.] [l�❑ W. MAX.] EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. CAST ALUMINUM TOP. CAST ALUMINUM BALLAST HOU5ING. FINISH ■ OPTIONS FINISH OPTIONS �� S7ANDARD ❑ HOUSE SIDE SHIELD TEXTUHED FINISH 90° . . . . . . . . . . HS 90° 135° . . . . . . . . . .HS 135° ❑ BI.ACK 180°. . . . . . . . . . HS 180° RAL-9005-T ❑ DUPLEX RECEPTACLE. . . . .DUP ❑ WHITE RAL-9003•T � GROUND FAULT ❑ GREY RECEPTACLE. . . . . . . . . . . .GFI RAL-7004T ❑ SINGLE FUSE ❑ DRKBRONZE ��20V. , 277V) . . . . . . . . . . .SF RAL-8013T � DOUBLE FUSE ❑ GREEN (208V. , 240V) . . . . . . . . . . .DF RAL-6005-T ❑ WALL MOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . .WM FORSMOOTH FINISH REMOVE SuFFix°r OPTIONAL HEIGHTS: (EXAMPLE: RAL-9500) ❑ 30�� SEEWEBSITEFOR ❑ ',�(j°