The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRe Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application (2) IPM.Note Re: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Re: Bill Gibson jackhunn@yahoo.com Bill Gibson jackhunn@yahoo.com SMTP jackhunn@yahoo.com Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application EX /O=TOV/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BILL GIBSON EX /O=TOV/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BILL GIBSON Received: from Edge.vailgov.local (192.168.100.120) by Exch02.vailgov.local (192.168.3.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:04:41 -0600 Received: from server45.appriver.com (69.20.58.226) by Edge.vailgov.com (192.168.100.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.218.12; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:04:40 -0600 Received: from [10.238.8.28] (HELO inbound.appriver.com) by server45.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTP id 1133076337 for bgibson@vailgov.com; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:05:51 -0400 X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 9/29/2010 9:06:04 PM X-Policy: vailgov.com X-Primary: bgibson@vailgov.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note-SnifferID: 0 X-Note: TCH-CT/SI:0-132/SG:6 9/29/2010 9:05:28 PM X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 98.136.86.55, Ugly c=0.327499 p=-0.166667 Source Normal X-Signature-Violations: 0-0-0-32767-c X-Note: SCH-CT/SI:1-1294/SG:1 9/29/2010 9:05:49 PM X-Warn: BASE64TEXT This message has base64 encoded text. X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: BASE64TEXT X-Country-Path: ->->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.136.86.55 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: smtp116-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com X-Note-WHTLIST: jackhunn@yahoo.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G201 G202 G203 G204 G208 G209 G253 G308 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: VALID X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.136.86.55] (HELO smtp116-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) by inbound.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.0) with SMTP id 71836232 for bgibson@vailgov.com; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:06:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 98212 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2010 01:06:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:Cc:Subject:From:Date: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=JMhvuUhRYC9IZSM33bzWvqCvciFzMPsJpp/I/BcDDs61503TccY3EFG8+xG1EmTL/ZJs4qB2Fn4icUlnflOmGzUe3JIc9vhh2PGc49rMZeYf7tylV3KEZVl+Dy5rcTJmT1O2sJDXakdJ/yLF5aqwx6kJ1y46xHWH/6DoVKf/kMk= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285808763; bh=fqO3675F8SlkP+Jucs9m75hT4AgSOSC6PWcltdzhHtA=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:Cc:Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=whjCw0b0EBSGep8zf9V3c01p7pyPbVevKITjR7yjrEK/bBMP wEQJwXWuwP9kKMl71o0zzHbzJ4rv8Vg+we/7NXL1HTg7YH8suh3fGXSW+v6YDlFloEHuKrDNgTMV05p31m0Gk2Ayjc2mFVjc8Bifw3ZBvB30mvn1W1Mp0YwPLSc= Received: from bda699.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (jackhunn@67.223.91.108 with xymcookie) by smtp116-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2010 18:06:02 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: NXtQcPWswBDwKUmiHkF6rnqO4RJZ X-YMail-OSG: cSdcqNIVM1kfP8V2D83.Qd15d.XHa09xZjTWIID4YbbqrVv v_C80pggOGDGHYdyOPKz4PfnJsgpWZpk0a1iG8WUrtCXPnXcXkuc_N42k68L VYuvGIXlrWmIVUWbgdrSpUmCnAZo5Jot5h_dcmQyWYWJwY7Rha3vSODeEims Mx0V7lweZWuUcxxK5ODk_SyHagbXX7Ebt312sh0EuUBIp5XnG_UQ1Cd5w1ar jbuDRqWsnC2R8tcurxESxfM_r5fweixCusZQQAZb6 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 742047539 Message-ID: <742047539-1285808761-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1949579238-@bda2238.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Reply-To: <jackhunn@yahoo.com> X-Priority: Normal References: <551903.46441.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com><CEEE45C2CF0DDC4B894236ED431DF8D5014A4F@Exch01.vailgov.local><337C3DF1E63B794E83942B032149F141017F9C@Exch01.vailgov.local> In-Reply-To: <337C3DF1E63B794E83942B032149F141017F9C@Exch01.vailgov.local> Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal To: Chad Salli <CSalli@vailgov.com> CC: <mary@Ann.Evans>, "Bill Gibson" <bgibson@vailgov.com> Subject: Re: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application From: <jackhunn@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:12:24 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part46142-boundary-215160332-799160198" MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: jackhunn@yahoo.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: Edge.vailgov.local X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous jackhunn@yahoo.com SMTP jackhunn@yahoo.com mary@Ann.Evans; Bill Gibson Chad Salli Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Chad, Thank you very much for your willingness to expedite the process for us. However, our consultant informs us that our existing permit with CDOT is limited to the 24 (21) residential units only and that we really need to update our permit to recognize the intended additional uses. Therefore, we will proceed with the permitting process and will keep you appraised of our progress. Because I believe that an approval is imminent, we request that we be allowed to market our spaces while we seek the amended permit. Respectfully, Jack hunn Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® ________________________________ From: Chad Salli <CSalli@vailgov.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:00:27 +0000 To: Bill Gibson<BGibson@vailgov.com>; 'jackhunn@yahoo.com'<jackhunn@yahoo.com> Cc: Tom Kassmel<TKassmel@vailgov.com> Subject: RE: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Jack If you can have Skip draft up a letter stating that the addition of the 40 leased spaces do not require a new CDOT access permit per the access code (section 2.6) and the back up to support his finding. I am fine with you moving forward. Thanks Chad From: Bill Gibson Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:15 AM To: Chad Salli Subject: FW: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application From: jack hunn [mailto:jackhunn@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:00 PM To: Bill Gibson Cc: Mary Anne Evans Subject: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Bill, As discussed on the phone today, here are the calculations from our consultant, Skip Hudson, regarding the limit of permitted parking before triggering the need for a decelleration lane on the Frontage Road. Skip has been in contact with CDOT to confirm their requirements. Skip is aware of our original permit application and the calculations that supported the existing permit. Ideally, we would like your concurrence to proceed to lease up to 40 seasonal spaces, staying within the limits that Skip has identified. We would like to avoid the time and expense of going through the process with CDOT to update our permit. The best time to promote the leasing of these spaces is between now and the end of October and we don't want to miss out on the opportunity. Please let me know your thoughts at your earliest convenience. Respectfully, Jack Hunn From: Skip Hudson <skiph@turnkeyllc.net> Subject: RE: CDOT response To: jackhunn@yahoo.com Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 6:06 AM Regarding 21 units, the trip generation would be 9 vph am & 11 vph pm, as shown below 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 1 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 8 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 9 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 7 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 4 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 11 I didn’t do the traffic study that the permit was based on so I don’t know why 24 condos = 10 trips. The ITE reference document has changed since then so it could be a different reference. In any case, the new traffic study supporting the permit for this effort will need to show 21 condos = 11 trips. However, we are dealing with the peak hour traffic volume that would make the eastbound right turn into the project driveway. In this case, the afternoon inbound volume is the highest case with 7 vph inbound. Assuming no employees, the new equation would be: 47 total allowed – 7 for condos = 40 parking spaces available (assuming no employee parking) Respectfully, Skip Hudson, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC O: 970-985-4001 F: 970-985-4002 C: 970-314-4888 skiph@turnkeyllc.net <http://us.mc448.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=skiph@turnkeyllc.net> 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 ü Please consider the environment before printing this email This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation of privacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to TurnKey Consulting, LLC. ________________________________ From: jackhunn@yahoo.com [mailto:jackhunn@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:31 AM To: Skip Hudson Subject: Re: CDOT response Skip, Thank you very much for your efforts and for your preliminary assessment of our situation and the opportunity to lease some of our surplus spaces. We had discussed the fact that some of the original 24 condos were joined together by buyers of multiple units. There are really only 21 residences now in the final configuration of ownership. How many spaces might we lease with these adjustments? Jack Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® ________________________________ From: "Skip Hudson" <skiph@turnkeyllc.net> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:00:11 -0600 To: <jackhunn@yahoo.com> Subject: CDOT response I talked to CDOT and found you current permit. Here are the main points: 1. Permit is for 24 condo units, which equals 10 trips per hour at the driveway (two way) 2. CDOT wont apply any credits for “second home” unless we do a week of traffic counts to verify what is happening now (this would cost $2,500 alone – I use a subconsultant out of Denver for counts and this would be their cost) 3. So your “base” demand would be 10 trips for condos 4. CDOT is not comfortable going right up to the allowed 50 trips per hour and they want a 5% buffer, so the max we could show in the study would be 47 trips. Is this worth your while, and should I still prepare the proposal? thanks Respectfully, Skip Hudson, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC O: 970-985-4001 F: 970-985-4002 C: 970-314-4888 skiph@turnkeyllc.net <http://us.mc448.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=skiph@turnkeyllc.net> 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 ü Please consider the environment before printing this email This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation of privacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to TurnKey Consulting, LLC. ________________________________ From: Skip Hudson Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 3:27 PM To: 'Jack Hunn (jackhunn@yahoo.com)' Subject: Skip Hudson contact info Here is my info. Thanks for contacting me about this work. Respectfully, Skip Hudson, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC O: 970-985-4001 F: 970-985-4002 C: 970-314-4888 skiph@turnkeyllc.net <http://us.mc448.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=skiph@turnkeyllc.net> 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 ü Please consider the environment before printing this email This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation of privacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to TurnKey Consulting, LLC. A052E395FD3AC64D876908D97063012A@vailgov.local <742047539-1285808761-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1949579238-@bda2238.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <551903.46441.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com><CEEE45C2CF0DDC4B894236ED431DF8D5014A4F@Exch01.vailgov.local><337C3DF1E63B794E83942B032149F141017F9C@Exch01.vailgov.local> <337C3DF1E63B794E83942B032149F141017F9C@Exch01.vailgov.local> Bill Gibson Bill Gibson jackhunn@yahoo.com jackhunn@yahoo.com Follow up Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application 14.0 Edge.vailgov.local Anonymous BT=4;II=<invalid>;SBMID=1;S1=<337C3DF1E63B794E83942B032149F141017F9C@Exch01.vailgov.local>;FIXUP=6.303;Version=Version 14.1 (Build 218.0), Stage=H2 5555555 BGibson@vailgov.com 00000003CAS/o=TOV/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=Bill Gibson Chad Salli EX /O=TOV/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Chad Salli CSalli@vailgov.com Chad Salli mary@Ann.Evans SMTP mary@Ann.Evans mary@Ann.Evans mary@Ann.Evans Bill Gibson EX /O=TOV/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bill Gibson BGibson@vailgov.com Bill Gibson