HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB060216Vt*v:!'7."z-4 t tE
l6f,lh'b/b Gts
ooaafittw Et€r,oFtE {t
Decign Review Board
ACTIOil FORI4
Departmeilt of Community Deyelsprnent
75 South Frontage Road, 1/ail, Colarado 8tr657
tel:970.479.2139 far:970.479.2452
web: www.vailgo%corn
Project Namer HILUROGERS RES ELEVATOR
Proiect Descrlption:
DRB Number: DR8060216
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW FOR AN ELEVATOR ADDMON TO EXISTING DUPLEX
Participants:
owNER HrLL,IAMES R. &ALEXANDM N06/05/2006
47OO S DOWNING ST
CHERRY HILLS WLI.AGE
co 80110
APPUCANT WILLIAM G. HEIN
3035 EAST ALMEDA AVENUE
0610512006 Phone: 303-722-8,101
DENVER
co 80209
ProjectAddress: 2605 BALD MOUNTAIN RDVAIL
2605 BALD MOUNTAIN RD
Location:
Legal DescripUon: Lot: 12 Block 2 SuMlvision: VAIL VILLAGE FIUNG 13
Parcel Number: 2101-034-0102-9
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Actionr CONCEPT
Conditions:
Cond: 200
A conceptual review is NOT a Design Review Board approval.
Planner: Warren Campbell
Minor Exterior Alterations
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2128 tax: 97Q.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
All projects reguiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An applicauon for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval,
MailingAddress:
ffi I Irv
E-mail Address:
/-\ rl I ipescription of the Requesr b /errd(+i'- a/Ji+;o^ fi) €x
^-tVp
Physical oooi"Eir it l
Parcef No.: -')rJ,-rtr ii,t,o:z'o (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no,) W
w0
owner(s) Signature(s): {1.:Y.,|Y4L^. 7. fU{t4\ /"/}[4irW A,
NameorAppliu"l, ltsilfram ,/-- thn - i\naff lbrat>W'6 lJ
,.nnnOOilr."rr
N
. tPE rrr crr[r I rE;r:
D Signs $50 Plus 91.00 per square foot of total sign area.
ft CJnceptual Review No Fee V
D New Construction $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.tr Addition $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions),E Minor Alteration $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,(multi-family/commercial) re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.D Minor Alteration $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,(single-family/duplex) re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.tr Changes to Approved Plans $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.tr Separation Request No Fee
Location of the Proposat: t-oh i 3 gtock:
Parcef No.: ;ro it-' <,t tJto'.4o (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no,)
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Department of Community Development
75 South Frcntage Road
Yail, Colorado E1657
970-479-2 t38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov,com
June 8, 2006
William Hein
3035 East Alameda Ave.
Denver, CO 80209
Re: DRB and staff comments regarding the conceptual proposal to add an elevator to
2605 Bald Mountain/Lot 12, Blk 2, Vail Village Filing 13
Mr. Hein,
This letter is to serve as a record of the comments made by the DRB at there June 7,
2006, public hearing at which they discussed your conceptual proposal to add an
elevator to the above address. lt also meant to serve as a documentation of staff
comments regarding the proposalwith the information provided. The following is a list of
the pertinent comments regarding the proposal.
. The DRB would like to see as much landscaping as can be accommodated in
front of the structure between the two garage driveways.
r The DRB was concerned with the feasibility of doing two stain /ays regarding
walls and drainage. lf two stainra)rs are proposed the locations of existing fire
hydrant and utility enclosure will need to be addressed.. One member of the DRB stated that that one stairway would be preferable for
helping to reduce the mirror image design of the structure and another member
stated that tvvo would be preferable for privacy reasons.
r With the cunent information available the only issue staff would bring attention to
is the maximum height of 33 feet in.this district and the elevator tower which will
need to comply.
Please review these comments and if you have any questions regarding this letter
pfease contact me at 970-475-2148.
With regards, , I
#m,hTo^CI
Senior Planner
Cc: File
$ """".r"o *"""
ti ,\ti:
rt
t,rl,
,ffi.ffii
EE+--=---< 1
I
It-ttldt' I
Itee qfjP-*Yqrylily qv .- Itat .l?,-, Wf- y'-, :yri,rutlA.,/igF-, I
?rFdE$'ffil Ptut ffi , wntil ffi v,ilL I
AL /-t G ,..At tLl& 44L.]G ,8 ,!, t At -A..?\A Iwle &uFtt'(, atrtt d blhq*va I
I
,
I
,
I
I
II
a
i
I
,
I
I
!
:b*"? . tyk?uHTAlH ratp
-/
mm
-./
t-Lv?U E^NMAIN
&\T+AL tA/rt, trAN
ti J< I+b\ wt:/
M?.
rbvbf t-EVrL fl/\l-{
A Ufif+ WyEL.=fttl elt-n"'l
h utrt+'r a-w.
lN tjvEt-
-abi, tzLil4'
Lfl.4raN4
tuLE4'
l-^.,t.]plda
1l*b4',1
- 'l'. lD't'l}* 1E1A-
-a:1
tttLtri
,4y'\WL Afi.Y
At-ld;y'?A %-r1a*
!$:h.
'tr,
t\l
rrr.,i
l,