Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGLEN LYON LOT 17 LEGAL (2)CASH on: Lot DEPOSIT FORMAT Receiot funds to: Name: 7,h,,, & L.rt- Purt:A.,s< Legal Subdivi Mai I i n g Add res s]jtOGteallLQztf Add Develo Project lm DEVELOPER I THIS AG among "Town"). WHER ncy for and project number and , the s obligated to p of own to provrs in the atta ES s) in accordance in the office of WHER Agreement, incl 7 ,Btocf, jr n fi : fAic'l 'oot3 pletion Dale: dut e, / {, Mr- GREEMENT Certificate of Developer lmprovement rity or collateral sufficient in the completion of certain improvements set the approved plans and specifications of the f Dev;lopment Department of the Town of Vail; and ishes of the all to provide collateral to guarantee performance of this improvements referred to in this Agreement, by means ent, in th for the completion of all improvements referred to default under this Agreement by the Developer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows: 1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to furnish all equipment and materials necessary to perform and complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement. The ., Developer agrees to complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement on or-before the lf; 6 dayof ' It^ne-- 15 ' ,2006. The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlile manne@inthisAgreement,inaccordancewith;||approvedp|ans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail, and to do all work incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following: a. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and to the satisfaction of, the Town Planner, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other official from the Town of Vail, as affecled by special districts or service districts, as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as completed by the Community Development Department and Public Works Department of the Town of Vail. Flcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash draft_1?1202.doc Page 1 of 5 rees to establish a cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as e amount ot $ t9,3'7{.0o (125% ot the total costs of the btta in tt . as a condition of a'll a r'rl- estimated bid(s)) as collateral Agreement, in the event there is a 2. To secure and guarantee performance of the obligations as set forth herein, the Developer agrees to provide collateral as follows: A cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in the amount of$ 14,JTS;co (125% of the total costs of the attached estimated bid(s)) as collateral for the completion of all improvements referred to in this Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer. 3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth abovel for another form of security or collateral acceptable to the Jown to .guarantee the faithful completion of those improvements referred to herein in this Agreement and the performance of the terms of this Agreement. Such acceptance bV the Tqwn of alternative security or collateral shall be at the Town's sole discretion. 4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee tf,ereof, Qe liable or responsible for any accident, loss."or d*nage happening or occurring to the frork specified in this Agreement prior to the completidn and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any perbons or property injured by reason of the nature of said work, butall of said liabilities shall be and are herebyassumed bythe Developer. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder, and the Developer shall reimburse the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in connection with investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action. This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer my have. 5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply for and the Tdwn may authorize a partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category of improvement after the subject improvement is constructed in compliance with all plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no condition shall the dollar amount of the collateral that is being held by the Town be reduced below the dollar amount necessary to complete all uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement. 6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements referred to in this Agreement are not constructed in compliance with the approved plans and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail or not accepted by the Town as complete on or before the date set forth in Paragraph '1 of this Agreement, the Town may, but shall not be required to, draw upon the security referred to in this Agreement and complete the uncompleted improvements refered to in this Agreement. Pursuant to Section 12-11-8, Vail Town Code, the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy referred to in this Agreement may be revoked until all improvements referred to herein are completed by the Developer or the Town in accordance with this Agreement. F lcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtafl_1212o2.doc Page 2 of 5 lf the costs of completing the uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement exceed the dollar amount of the deposit, the excess, together with interest at twelve percent (12o/o) per annum, shall be a lien againsl the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf the Developer fails or refuses to complete the improvements refened to in this Agreement, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations), of the Vail Town Code, and the Developer shall be subject to penalties pursuant to Section 12-3-10 (Violations: Penalties) and Chapter 1-4 (General Penalty), of the Vail Town Code. 7. The Developer shall warranty the work and materials of all improvements refened to in this Agreement located on Town property or within a Town right-of-way, pursuant to Chapter 8-3, of the Vail Town Code, for a period of two years after the Town's acceptance of said improvements. 8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from time to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto. F lcdev\Bif l\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtaft_121202.doc Page 3 of 5 Dated the day and year first above written. STATE OF COLOMDO COUNTY OF EAGLE SS. Thp foregoing peveloper lmprovement Agreemcnt vyas ackr;pwledged before me this dl Day ef !'-\ Ovrc.r'-b.,- , ZOO) by . )$1 4 f LLv'pL dL, 4- Witness my hand and official seal. ^( My commission expires A r/Y-'i 2,s(iT oreement was acknowledoed before me this bS dy (h-<,a12\-a^^lt? ee'.n, r-ff . Notary Planner Flcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash draft_121202.doc Page 4 of 5 ATTACHED COPIES OF THE ESTIMATED BID(S) F:\cdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtaft_121202.doc Page 5 of 5 Purchase Development, LLC PO Box 1391 Vail, CO 81657 John & Lara Purchase l3l0 Greenhill Ct. Vail, CO 81657 November2l,2005 RE: Estimate to complete 13l0 Greenhill Ct. The following is the itemized estimate to complete your house: Exterior Stone on Stairs $3,500 Exterior Steel Railings $4,000 Re-Vegetation & Tree Planting $2,000 Install Lighting Fixtures $1,000 Install Plumbing Fixhues $1,000 Total $lf ,500 Completion date for all of the above items, allowing for spring snow thaw is Mayl5th, 2006. Regards, Owner, PurchaseDevelopment, LLC General Contractor for l3l0 Gre€nhill Ct. Vail, CO 81657 John & Lara Purchase 1310 Greenhill Ct. Vail, CO 81657 Mr. Matt Gennett, AICP TOV Community Development Vail, CO November 21,2005 RE: Construction Deoosit/Bond to complete 13l0 Greenhill Ct' Matl Enclosed please find the estimate from our General Contractor (Purchase Development, LLC ) to complete r€maining few items at our house. Also attached is a check payable to TOV for 125% of this Estimate. Please call me at 390-9943 if you have any questions and/or when you need to me to sign any paperwork. Thanks Youk . D€partmont of Community D€velopment ?5 S. Frontage Road Vall' CO 81657 R.niptNo.-5ru3 ffiletotheTowNoFvAlL oor oooo 314111 oor ooDo 3141110 oor oooo 314 1112 oor oooo 3141211 oot oooo 314111'l 3141111 3141111 6or oloo 312 3ooo oor ooo0 gtz I -ot\\ \3Lo .._ / check# [t f> RecelvedbY: ^ n^^+ Ct^., 001 000 1 000 115 0511212005 da zaitQor frli)o a -O tr EI IrT EQA Od Irl FrDCI vl NO J Fo |'rAFFdE.r, D30dE d, o Fi{o>o ,1 D tsrv U UF ql ci tsr O UF ,t I i-7 FUoFF, QO10 vz BrOriE F FI FIzz EOFE p a c)7 'oFE q FFBZ ooAE F a FI A FT zo F :U zt4 EETo (,rdF trA D EU()U A FI td D FI o 2 o i ; . ND E>aI,r E ,{"r, 40 Fro 3 rd \) -) ..'r) <t) c6 IJ '.i(,) o, (6|-rl qJ b0'aE.*9 .2->;1^= :1 v EFd3 h? iB .: oo-q.tr(,) I c! P.T G-.il=tBXFr-.i;:ixtr >tre9- o, ooEE E:gxi (,t >. > F.i :Y,^ lt,|,X .9oh,l!r; C:= .J .r.r ': ! '! ., = ', t, 2'J)Z? F h! 2,6 E. Fz 'l ?,'i cri E J U o I =l?l$l 'l A z t,! ? U a F I I!-rlF-l1/l ;1-l ::.l, U- I NIO.lo'l-l E 'r- € U lnl\Cl El ^l r'i I (gl >l 9l sl 9l 0l -l i) b. o 3 €E C,]l 7l UI (,ll 0Jl UIol(gl IJI "l ,ii cl o b. a 'F! 'i E z 65>.9:rc>0J Fi Cl -Ji:3 'rl cXrsx= =u-'aE lEY x_b tl! "o6Lb EQ'rt tc x= .:v-. trY- !reEElx -s :.9 69X i(,):.-roO 0., +'' bO E Y: :3oo i:> (,)t6cJ3ol !'!! lg \+- ;: +r v,Y - ,r, e =(JU.>.8.eFi FUO >tUz '{ftp U Uo frlo FI H4UHhH F{ H Fl U ntv{(: Y--)-+ J'/q( \5 \ \LO OFra< oo qJ <. RP !d+:\ ,f\t.t-rS.sR NS L qJ LJ t- o 5 r-( o ( q.)U P q)v) u .h c!'(/) oo \ r5 o I.or-3t#oo lnspec$:,rl,FeduFs,l n:Forting ge zz Requested Inspect Date: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 Inspeclion Area: GCD Site Address: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL 1310 Greenhill Court. Vail. CO A/P/D Information Activitv: ConslTyp6: uwner: Contractor: Description: Cominent: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Tvoe: B-BUILD Occupahby: Status: ISSUED lnso Area: GCD IC WORKS - LSANDOVAL AND ROUTED TO GREG DENCKLA - JSUTHER R-Jr)UlIrLI\ O MATT GENNETT - JSUTHER chase Develooment is the new contractor. Letter is in file Requested Time: 08:30 AM' Phone: 390-9943 Entered Bv: DGOLDEN K Sub Tvoe: NSFRUse: V N Phone: 390-9943 )NS SUBMITTED"AND ROUTED TO GREG DENCKLA. JSUTHER GRFA AND ENLARGING DECK OFF MASTER BEDROOM SUBMITTED AND NCKLA AND MATT GENNETT. ( ADDED $25.OOO VALUATION). JSUTHER stamped by the architect and thd engineer as ihe property is in 6 High Hazard Debris MENT LLC OUT Time Exp: TT GENNETT 11 Comment: RE\ Comment: ADI Comment: Cha Comment: El Comment: W Comment: Rr Comment: lL Comment: N Comment: M Inspection Historv Item: 20 ONALrtoao Comment: MJL has been lerminated as the contractor. Purchase Develooment is the new contractor. Letter i confirmino this action 8/15/05 - JSUTHER Comment: DIA and cleck for $14.375 recieved. - LCAMPBELL Comment: per Matt Gennett's C/O inspection condition. the contractor has removed the dumpster - BGIBSON Requested Inspection(s) Item: 540 BLDG-Final C/ORequestor: John Purchase AssionedTo: JMONDRAGON- Action: I Item: 502 PW-Rouqh oradeItem: 503 PW-FinaTdri'vewav oradeItem: 10 BlDG-Footinqs/Ste'e[ ** Aporoved "* 07121104- Insoector: Art Action: AP APPROVED Comment: APPROVED PARTIAL FOOTING - PORTIONS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS INSPECTION HAVE BEEN CIRCLED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET 5209/03/04 Insoector: GCD Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 3 PADS AT NORTH SIDE. BUTTRESS WALL FOOTINGS PER REVISED PLANS. -09/29105 Inspector: shahn Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL Comment: i't0t27t05 | wall footing. PARTIAL INSPECTION {ER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY AND HILITED ON 'lD APPROX 20FT ON NE TO EXISTING Comment: INSPECTED (2) PARTIAL F.ISPECTED (2) PARTIAL FOOTINGS ON EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY IELD DRAWINGS. APPROX 25FT ON SW AND APPROX 2OFT ON NE REPT131 Run Id. 5932 10-24-200O Inspection Request Reporting Page 44 4:30 om Vail- CO'- Citt Of - Requested lnspect Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 Inspeclion Area: GCD Site Address: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL 1310 Greenhill Court. Vail. CO A/P/D Information ActiviW: P05-0010 Tvoe: B-PLMB Const Tvp6: Occuoahbv: Ounier: Purchase. John & Lara Applicant: BEAVER CREEK PLUMBING & HEAT PIPING i FROM BEAVER CREEK PLUMBING AND HEATING STATING THEY O OUTWEST MECHANICAL. LETTER IN FILE. - LCAMPBELL Sub Tvoe: NSFR Status: ISSUEDU'se: Inso Area: GCD Phone: 970-471-4850 Phone: 827-5702 Reouested Insoection(sl Requestedrim:: ilaggily Entered By: DGOLDEN K Time Exo: rk A]d. ba!!t_jlam@] qLlor TCO. 1.) Set all other fixtures or cap dwv. .L FIXTURES INSTALLED BATH SHOWER AT WIRE. IN MASTER ABHT AND POWDER RM. lnsoection Historv Item: 210 PLMB-Underqround ** Aooroved ** 05/26/05 lnspector: JRM ' Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 2 TESTS 10 # AIR TESTS APPROVED ' iItem: 220 PLMB-Rouqh/D.W.V. "* Aooroved ** 06/01i05 Insoector: cdavis ' Action: AP APPROVED Comment: 3 qauqes 2 @ 10# airtest 1 (O 8# airtest Ve'ht slack m-ust be upsized I-o 3" within one foot of roof sheathing ' ,Item: 230 PLMB-RouqhMater ** Aboroved ** 06/01/05 Inspector: cdavis ' Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Twb Tests @ 100#Item: 240 PLMB-Gas Pioino - '* Aooroved ** 06/01/05|nEFector:cdaVis..Action:APAPPRoVED Comment: 2 Gauqes both at 15# airtestItem: 250 PLMB-Pool/Hot Tub"Item: 260 PLMB-Misc.Item: 290 PLMB-Final 11l17lOS Insoector: GCD Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED Comment: NO HOT WATER NOT ALL FIXTURES INSTALLED 1112'1t05 Insoector: MROYER Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVALComment Foi TCO onlv! Kitchen sink and bath number 1 ok for TCO. 1.) Set all other fixtures or cap dwv. 09/25106 Insoector: GCD Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED Comment: NOACCESS SEE MO5-0082 09127106 Inspector: GCD Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED Comment: l.PATCH HOLE lN MASTER BATH SHOWER AT WIRE. 2.CAULK WATER CLOSETS IN MASTER ABHT AND POWDER RM. REPT].31 Run Ids 5845 1%-31#ou In"p""$:,'l,8?$'a"ltP"ning t" " Requested lnspect Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006' Inspection Area: GCD Site Address: 1 310 GREENHILL CT VAIL '1310 Greenhill Court. Vail. CO A/P/D lnformation Activitv: M05-0082 Tvoe: B-MEChConstTvpb: Occuoairbv:Oryrier: Purchase. John & Lara Applicant: BEAVER CREEK PLUMBING & HEATING Contractor: OUT WEST Descriotion: PURCHASE Cominent: REVISIONS INC Phone: 827-5702 I, RADIANT HEAT AND SNOW MELT 5 BATH EXHAUST FANS AND 1 DRYER EXHAUST. ADDED VALUATION OF SubTgoe: NSFR Phone: 471-4850 Status: Insp Area: ISSUED GCD Comment: Comment: Comment: EXCHANGE 1 BOILER FOR A LARGER UNIT FOR EXTRA SNOWMELT. .OO. ROUTED TO JR - JSUTHER &H releasing the permit to Outwest Mechanical received on &17-06. lt is in the ANSWER THAT W 8 FEET. 06/10/05 lnsDector: GCD Action: Pl P Comment: INSLAB HYDRONICS MAIN ENTRY AND GARA ON o6t21to5 Action: ICS 11 GAGES 100psi Action: NR NOT READY FOR INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS RANGE 11/18/05 Comment: 09/25l06 Comment: o9l27to6 Comment: )RNER. {TED OUTSIDE. T WALL WITHIN 8 FEET. Requested lnspection{s) Item: 390 MECH-Final Reouestor: John Purchase Coniments: will call 389-3342 Assioned To: JMONDMGON- Action: Mechanical. DGOLDEN -lnstall ) has sent a letter relievino Beaver Creek P & H fron the iob and tuminq it over to Outwest etter is in the file. We are-waiting for the lefter ftom BeaVer Creek P & Fl relinquising the job. - Requested rim:: lgbllJly Time Exp: Entered BY: DGOLDEN K ion only.'OtheFbbileTGnowmelt) not installed at this time.Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: lnsoection Historv Ve cei En Item: 200 MECH-Rouqh ** Aooroved " 06117109 Insoector: cdavis ' Action: AP APPROVED _ . .qo_mment: All iluct work complete bath exhaust,dryer vents comb air ducts and flue ventItem: 310 ME^C!-| p^aling ^ -* Approved -" DTOBE2 REPT131 Run Id: 5845 OI I0l/'4V Project Name: PURCHASE CHANGE Project Description: Pafticipants: oo Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel | 970.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us OWNER PURCHASE, JOHN 754 POTATO PATCH DRIVE E. VAIL co 81657 License: APPUCANT LAUTERBACH, MICHAEL PO BOX 5026 EDWARDS co 81532 License: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL LoE 17 Block: Subdivision: 210312403015 see conditions DRB Number: DRB040350 07 /2612004 Phone: 970-926-4007 Location: 1310 GREENHILL CT GLEN LYON SUB, Change to approved plans, roof forms (does not impact ridge heights) 07 12612004 Phone: 390-9943 Project Address: Legal Description: Parcel Number: Comments: Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION ACtiON: STAFFAPR Date of Approvalz 08/O4|2004. Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities, Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced . and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid:$20.OO ' t,-,i.zp.eaao 9346flr4 OI oo t'..l0.lBE F.1/1 M inor Exterior Alterations TOI4'NM Application for Design Review oepErtment of Communlty oEvelopment 75 Souh FronEge Roa4 Vail, Colorado 8165/ teh 970.479.2139 ftx: 970.479.24s2 Web; Wl'ff.vailgov,cDm General Infornation: All proJccts cquirlng @gn r€rleu, must r$lve lpprovlt pdor trt submiturlg a bulfdhg permn appltcaHon. please refrr t0 S1c submlttdl requlremenE frr fic paficular appfoval that G rEquesEd. An apptlcaton tur Deslgn Revtew canrlot bc acc0ptcd un0l 8ll required inbfmauon i6 rucelved by the community D6veloprnent Department, The pncject may also need to be |tsrleild by thc Town Coundt and/o the Planning and Environmentsl Cammi$lon. DsEign rBvlsw Epprowl lapccs unlcss I buildlng perrnit'rs issued and construction aommcnces within one year of tfie appruval, Description of tfre Locatfon of thePrcporalt t-ott 4 dock:-Subd1,irlon, -6/"a L7 t^ PhysicalAddress: /3lo 6r.-^R,'f C(, *-C+ Prrcef No.: 2/o? l>4 o3 o t {(Contact Eagl€ Co. Assessof at 970-3zB-E640 for parcel no,) Zoningr Name(s) of Owne(s):v 6-4-, (- rr, J G- 7fi l\\|*e,-k Pe(*L De Phone: ( t6- l-!3- Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant:tl7,' ec <-,-/ f.c-*.-.6,-.-L Mailins Addressr PoB go re fu,*- E-mail Addrees:rax: .-.. i>C =f o IJ-,-R.E4€ IVE D jijt 13 ,,i,: Plus $1,00 per square foot of btal 5l9n area, Fgr construction of a new bulldlng ot demo/rebuild, For an addltion whem squar€ footage Il added to anY r€sidential or comm$cirl butlding (includ€s 250 addttions & imerioi converslons). For mlnor changes b buildings end site lmprovcmentsf sudl as, rcrconng, painting, wlndgw additions' lEndEcaplng' ftnses and retaining walls, etc, For minor dunges to bultdhgE and slte lmprovementi, st ch asl rerooflng, pahhng, wirido,v addltions, tandscaplnE, fences and retainlnq walls, ek. For ruvFions to plans already approvcd by Plannlng shff of the Deshn Revlei'Board, A:J,.<( {s/<rb<( Type of Review and Feel tr Sions I Conceptual Revlew tr Neirv Con*rudonE Addltion E Hinor AlteraUon (nulH4amtly/commcrd.t) ! Minor Altarflon (slnglG-f.mllyi dudex) -ay' Changos h Apprcved FlarF tr Separafibn Request.{-- t- z-o $s0 No Fee $650 s300 $2s0 $20 $20 No Fce b7 tl fl&Jo.t - o(53 of oo MJL DEVELoPMENT INC. PO BOX 5026 EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 OFFICE (970)926-4007 FAX (970) 926-4011 MOBTLE (970) 471-1670 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MAT-[ GENNETT TOWN OF VArL COMMUNTTY OrthsOprtrsXr MICHAEL J. LAUTERBACH W / JULY 2I.2fiH LOT I7, GLEN LYON Enclosed are three sets of revised elevations for the Purchase Residence which is being constructed on the above referenced lot. The building originally was designed with hipped roofs and the Purchase family has decided that they would rather haw an alpine look to the roofs. Consequently, the architect has redesigned these roofs and we are seeking Design Review Board or staffapproval for the roof changes. Please let me know what is required to obtain approval for the roof modifications. Once they are approved, I will submit revised structural drawings to the building department. Thank you in advance for vour assistance with this matter. PLEASE INITIAL AJ'ID DATf, HERE AND FAX TO SENDER TO CONFIRJU RECEIPT DELMRY ADDRESS: 854 BEARD CREEK TRAIL, EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 ot oo l. * i * * {i * +***'} lr*'r** t'rrt'}l t'}*** * * * I * * * ** * * * *'t*** * * ** *,r. | * * * {. * * ** * * * * *'}** i * * * * ** * r*r,} ** 'l * * * * * * * t* * TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement * * *:l * * t**** +'l'|** *'|*** r't'lf * t* * * * * * *** * * * r.r.** ** * * * * * ** * * ** t* * i. *'] *r.'r:r. * +'l * 'r'| * *'l*,|* *.1{. * * t* * {. * *'} ** Statsement Nuriber: R040005275 Amount: $20.00 07/26/2OO4O9:55 AIII Palments Method: Check Init: iIS Notation: #5?11lMrcHAEr, IJAUTERBACH Permit No: DRB040350 !4re: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans Parcel No3 2103124 03 015 Site Addregg: 1310 GRBENHIIJJ CT VAII, Location: 1310 GRBENHILL ef Total Fees: $20.00 Ttrie Payment.: 920.00 Total Ar,r, Pmts: $20.00 Balance: $0.00 ** *'t l. t * * *** atl,r** +t|*t|* * * ** * * 'r rt * * !t * '| * * * * * * t** * * *,* * * * **,1* * * *'a 'l {. ** * * tl ** * ** * * * rr * * * | {.'1.'l 'l * * *,1. 'f * *'r*,t ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Descriotion Cunnent Prnts DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00 t' Planning Administrative Action Form Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailqov,com Project Name: PURCHASE GRFA APPEAL TO PEC Project Description: Participants: OWNER Purchase, John & Lara 754 Potato Patch Drive Vail co 81657 License: APPUCANT CUNNINGHAM. BARRY Project Address: Legal Description: Parcel Number: Comments: ADM Number: ADM0.IO001 APPEAL TO THE PEC-THE STAFF DECISION ON GRFA REI-ATED TO THE PURCHASE RESIDENCE. SPECIFICAI.IY REI-ATING TO TOWN STAFF APPUCATION AND INTERPRETATION OF SEfiON 12-1s-3 (A) (1) (D) RELATTNG TO AREAS EXCLUDED FROM GRFA. 0412712004 Phone: 04127 12004 Phone: 303-947-2749 271 ANEMONE DRIVE BOULDER co 80302 License: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL Location: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO Loh 17 Block: SuMivision: GLEN LYON SUB. 210312.t03015 withdrawn by Barry Cunningham TfWN|/Fl/AN BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: WITHDRWN Date ofApproval: Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Planner: Matt Gennett ADM Fee Paid: $100.00 . 94/14/2444 22i29 -a-- -- nPR 2a 44 49549 zoo.t rl,"f"to 9?O?1E03o p.l -t{ur ST I0l1/N0 APPeals Form fi€ISnmett of Commurlq Aadop.rait 7t Sor^h tfonL!. R!{O, vrlt. Cobndo 816t r!1 trc.{79.21Jt br: 970.'rtc !492 wab: rr./v!t-vJhov.c(rn Geno|al lnlbnrtdton: ThE brm E cq{ird lbr nll09 sA apFrl ol s slltt, htlgn Aeri<rr 6oard, r Plannlng 'rd.Ewltgn|IcntrlCornmb*rn acifon/Cdsion. - f onrplcte ftrr'l ond 556r6t;{ |Qtlllemtlts m|It be submmed io n|o cdnmirnlty DctelsFnart oepcnmenr wltnm t\|rcmY (20) h,vin6s d.yt ot ti€ dliplb{ lcdoryd'cirbn' A(ton/D.dtbn tdne rDFrl.d: TIE sff dlclsldn on GRIA te{'trd to t}E Pq'{i$lg so.diollv rebtiolLloTo{|lr $rf?r DDlLttiorr end l|rtrrDr(lllh al scdol\ r 2't5'3(AXt )fdl leli$tab srlr qduddtmGBFA orborlcrtn/D.c rlo^, hA\ 2D r ?'ON ' tcato o. $,t tr garron ,witcdr, rctlo,r.ldciion: c^mmuoivl)9ylbp@ll!3lgltsl9Dlr- Do6lhlr r9Dcal lnvaavo a iFdtlc !E|!GI ot bird? vts t' F, r|r you rn lt Ert Pm9-1t oHnf' Y€r ndl v{tdrdtndn! f|id c Its|G qf Atp.i.nt(.): otrY L o'nnhohtm 'tlllln! lddrfr: ln ^dflione Dth€, Sould€t, CO-!0fq? '.----- thcoc: l0.l4llzzllL- Phyrlcal Addtc l.l Vdlt 1119 Grcnhid coud tqJ Docqlpdoa of A99.n.n(!) praFrtv ln Vrlll,teF2!D-8'o<t:-StDcrvldon:-6led'x00- regdrrnqt, StlnrruElrlr i ' rzr''-- ---- (Atrch ? lst oa siqnstlrc! lf rEG toace is tquN)' r.|bml&rl RqulrE|nml3i 1. on e laoata€ stleet ot rPp6ntte strocts of oap'r' pmvlde a dcnail€d cxplansllon ot how lou ete dn "iggrtercd ot advtG.ly lfffid pe|^sqil'' 2. on . !.D6rate rhod of r.prftr@ ,i,-Jo or puott, specfy tlt pT* 1"lt'* of se !Dt'al' Pl"s' cite spesfir mde l€rlbrE hding |elevancc torhe adlon D€lng apfEiec 3. prdvlde a hst of narnet ond add-*iitotrt t"rts ara pnFtal aooresrcs io vril) of alt oine's c'-' ;;;;r-;;;" iri-;brrd sf tu ;'-pEar ona itt aolain p.ott ** (ihcrud60 o"na* wtra€ Drm.dl6 rrc regJt4rd t *"-[it i"qo pt"pttty by a t19H'of-v{'y' st'€qfi' ol dh€t Interv!n1ng barriet)' n. pr"149 5pm@, tdd.6ro envcDF b 'r'n p''oPe'ty orryner llgEd in (l')' rrE!6t gJBMtr .I}lls FoRH Atro Au StD ITTA TEQJIREML,j I S rq''i&i'of Jl. ornnmirr ot coxt'lur'nv Der'EltPMcNT''-'ii sann-riot'^6E RoAD' v^IL, @loilooor6sz t*r., l.ulv oodrrtttu/tlurl.rb Plriiltc|o4 orot6 Fol&r\o{s qht{ioltm\Ptc 'o0'!l ' AD^J 2}or^nY!n!tn 'gtrtlr lt'' do' Adjacent Property Owners List Appeal of Town Decision Glen Lyon Subdivision Lot l7: PURCHASE, JOHN LAYTON & LARA JUNE -JT 754 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL, CO 81657 I-ot 24:. CUNNINGHAM, BARRY E. 271 ANEMONE DR BOULDER, CO 80302 Lot24: HARLAN, HAL P., HUGH P., & DOUG H. PO BOX 29176 INDIANAPOLIS. IN 46229 Lot l6: GERSTENBERGER, ALLEN & JANET 5255 BOW MARDR LITTLETON, CO 80123 Lot 16: HORN, JEFFREY M. & SALLYHELMS -JT 18 AVONRD BRONXVILLE. NY IO7O8 Lot23: HOVEY,NANCYM. I WOODHOLM LN MANCHESTER, MA 01944-1057 Int25: LOHRE. JOHN O. & MARY B. 333 LOGAN ST STE 203 DENIVER, CO 80203 Lot26: LAZIER, ROBERT BUDDY 386 HANSON RD VAIL, CO 81657 Tract C and D: TOWN OF VAIL C/O FINANCE DEPT 75 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL. CO 81657 Appeal of a Decision on Gross Residential Floor Area Related to the Purchase Residence (DRB04-0016) Supplemental Information - As required by appeal form Subject Property: Lot17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, 1310 Greenhill Court Appellant: Barry Cunningham is the appellant. Mr. Cunningham owns the adjoining lot (Lot 248, Glen Lyon Subdivision) to the subject property (Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision). The appellant is an aggrieved and adversely affected person as his home is located adjacent to the subject property and relies upon Gross Residential Floor Area regulations to ensure the proper control of the bulk and mass of residential structures. The Purchase residence as approved will have an adverse effect on Mr. Cunningham's property, the immediate environment, and the quiet enjol'rnent of his home to a degree that exceeds the general interest in community good shared by all persons. Mr. Cunningham has standing to file this appeal and is an aggrieved or adversely affected person as defined by Section l2-3-3 ofthe Town Code. Below is the specific decision being appealed: GRFA/Bulk and Mass Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) and the Town's Design Guidelines were developed by the Town to help control bulk and mass of structures along with other tools such as limitations on site coverage, landscape area, and building height. One element of this project that Mr. Cunningham noticed when reviewing the applicant's plans was the extensive area being created under the home. In addition to an enclosed two-car garage buried under the building, there is approximately another 1,270 sq. ft. of partially enclosed floor area under the proposed residence. This area of approximately 1 ,270 sq. ft. was excluded by staff in the calculation of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) for the Purchase project. This area should have been included in the calculation of GRFA for the property as the space does not comply with Section 12- I 5-3 .A. I .d. of the Town Code. The Town has determined that the Purchase property is entitled to approximately 5,470 square feet in GRFA, and (based upon a total of GRFA calculations for individual floors) that the proposed residence contains 5,034 square feet, exclusive of the partially enclosed area on the lower level outside of the garage. Specifically, Section 12-15-3.A.1.d. states that the followine can be excluded from GRFA: "roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or similar features with no more than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space, provided the opening is contisuous and.fullv open from floor to ceiling with an allowance for a railing of up to forty-four inches (44') in height." (Emphasis added) The perimeter ofthe open space, measured under the outer border ofthe upper story and the roof covering the entry area, measures 774 feet, as a result of which there must be a contiguous opening of 43.5 feet, being 25o/o of the 174 foot perimeter. At no point under the upper story or the entry roofis there a contiguous opening of 43.5 feet. The longest opening, under the entry roof and the upper story, is approximately 2l feet. The lower Ievel of this building with walls on each side (of varying lengths and with intervening openings) is more characteristic ofa basement than it is a deck, porch, terrace, or patio. Because of the failure of this partially enclosed area to comply with the standard for exclusion established by 12-3-3.A.1.d., the partially enclosed area is to be considered GRFA. When this partially enclosed area is considered as GRFA, as required by the Code, the proposed structure contains in excess of 6,300 sq. ft., well in excess of the 5,470 square feet of GRFA allowed on this lot. The area under the building does not satisfy the requirement for exclusion from GRFA because (a) none of the four openings ts 25o/o of the perimeter of the space and (b) no two of the openings comprising 25oh of the perimeter are contiguous (even under the more liberal test applied for multiple family dwellings in l2-3-3.A.2.9.) and fully open from floor to ceiling. Each non-contiguous opening is separate from another by at least 4.5 feet of structure. The Town has interpreted that a "series" ofopenings canbe considered to meet the requirement for a25o/o opening, however, the regulation does not recognize multiple openings as a single opening and, on the contrary, requires the opening to be "contiguous." The Purchase residence plans violate this code provision, as there is no single contiguous opening meeting the 25o/o provision. Any calculation of GRFA which excludes from GRFA an area partially enclosed on all sides and not satisfying the test for exclusion from GRFA calculations violates the purpose and intent of Title 12, Chapter 15, Sections l2-15-l and 12-15-3. Action Requested of the Planning and Environmental Commission: The appellant requests: That Planning and Environmental Commission overturn the decision and calculation of the GRFA for the Purchase Residence, thereby nullifying the Town's approval of the project. THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Gommission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on May 24,2004,at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, to allow for the conversion of an existing commercial unit to a residential dwelling unit, located at 500 South Frontage Road West, Unit B-1 11 (The Wren)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.Applicant Michael D. KrohnPlanner: Bill Gibson An appeal of an administrative interpretation of Section 12-1 5-3(A)(1 Xd), Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-3(8), Administrative Action, Vail Town Code, determining that a proposed unenclosed area shall not be considered (GRFA) in the GRFA calculation forthe Purchase Residence, located at 1310 Greenhill Court/Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.Appellant Barry E. CunninghamPlanner: Matt Gennett A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12- 7H-7,Yail Town Code, and a request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of the Lionshead Gore Site Hotel and the operation on a new private skier club, new lodge dwelling units and conference facilities and meeting rooms on the first floor or street level floor of a structure, located at 675 Lionshead Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request). Applicant: Vail CorporationPlanner: George Ruther The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970\ 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Published May 07, 2OO4,in the Vail Daily. -G. o F.\gtI(PE Engineerlng; Irc"..s ql gr{rErtfl}ncDd[al. SOIL Ar{D FOI'IIDATION II{IE.SIIGAIION roR PROPOSEDBESIDET{(E L{II ':t, Gr,uY LYON SLEDIVSIIOT{ TOWNOFVAIL EAGT,E COI'NIY, COI,ORADO PROJECTNO. OSI'D4 aricrrs[ 22,zoo3 PREFAR@FOR: MR" JOENLOENE 393 lrleAlrl sT, surrB 26 DEtsltR,, COE{rzlt3 P.O Eox 2t37, sdnrccs, CO 81 53\ (97 0) 926-90l$ Tc[ (90) 9269089 Frx TABI.EOFCOTTTEtrTIS E'(FIUTII'EIIUMMARY . ... Z SC0PEoFSTIJDY .--.---..2 SrrEDESCnIFTTOT{ ........ 2 PROPOSED@NSIRUCnON ...... 3 FIELDINVESTIGATIOI\T ,...3 ST,BSURFACESW,ETCDORqADS'AIES.CONDTNON .... I FOT'}IDATIONRE@MME}IDAIIONS ...... 4 E(CAVATIONDIFfiq'LIIES . ... . .. J| SI,AB CONSTRIJSNON .. .. 4 RErArNrNowAr"Is .,...... 5 UNDERDRAII{SYSIEM ... . 5 SIIB@ADINGAiIDDRAITiIATOB ......... . 6 IAWNRRICATION .-...-,.6 LIMTTATIO.I -......7 FIq'RETI IPCATTONSKETCH .... ..DRAWINGNO.I STJBSURPACEHTT.ORf.TIONT'GS. ....FIG{'RENO. I PERIMEf,ERDRAIN. ....,.FIGil'RENO. 2 LKp Fqgin?trrn& Ing. EXD|CUTII4ESI'DTMARY Ths proposcd todfule $ould bc luppond eith cilead@rl $pe erlrd ftotn$ dccigcd ftr a aUcwable soil bcningpcesuc of3000 psf Tley rhould costruot tta fronhgs qrtc uofirmte4 sardftoo3 bouldcrs. 8c follddm Rccolnclalrtkn* scotDoFstruDY Tlis r€Dat prcaGds thp rcsulb of a 3ubsdce Sbil and Foudmion hrcstig4iqn for a proposed residocc o be cmsinrctcd oD IJt 17, Glco Lyo Subdivisim' Torro of VaiL Easlc Coury, C.ol6edo. Thcpurporc of frs subsr&cc soil od foudrim invcttisldm wus b ttrtcmirc thp cogheriqg chre.Hriic! ofthe fwdaion rcil od io porvide rxornaaaios for tc foun&fiondesip, gndirgn ed dninap. SIIEDES'CRIPUON I.or l7 i! s 0.5448{c$s lot, m Grca Ifll Corg d thc rod df tbe c,ul{o"saq b lbe *orm ofvail, Erglc Corntyl Colqdo. Th! tpogngFy is noaerrc. Vegadio on tte lot oonskcd of aspco fqcst, gcattcrcal phcr,, ud ruodrrce undertrusb. Otainage b to &s notth and nor&nrcst The lot is rataqt ItrgtEndlna!fiin& IDc. gor 24.rtr,J Lct-10 atv;'/:oa 3 PROPOSED(:ONSTRUCIION We rmdrrrteul th* {te pr,oposea reidacc will consi$ d a rno+tory, v*ooil fraoc cmstrocdon, witl a possitfe ralhoa Uawi, m s mere fr'mdstion l-ocds ue dicipatod !o h ligbq typical of rqiahtiat constsdim" If fte finrlkcd phns difrcr sigeifm!ilV &orr tbe abov€ undcrstauding, lhcy slmltl no@ us tortcrnbatc rhe rtcmaddsDc of thfu rqort EITIJ} II{VESTIGATIOIII Ttc ficld irvegigation, cod*ed on Augusr l+ Z0fJ3, cosised of, loggitg @d sampliry ooe t€st pit The tcst pit locaim is $osra on Dewing No. I - Excaatim of tle tcst pit *rs donrudng alobDeerc 35Zf$, uinitackhoc. Wc $ortbe soilproflc oftbctcstpil oo thc ffiffroc Bgloraio Log Fi$rcNo f . Soil rrryles fqrlsbcagry soil orb/sis asd observation rrrs '*ar af sclcctd inewrls. SIJESI'NFACE SOIL AIiID GNOUNDWATER, (]ONDrIION Ilc soil erpqeed b the tcst pit cdlistcal of 2 &ct of topsoil orrur 3 feet of ligtr brovm sandy gmrcl with mgqlc mok frEgn€G .td some ro* orrr oae to 2 feet of houn sady gr$El rritbsrnd$oocborilalcc. R!6rsal *ar ooeed at7 fecr hrtptcst pit Grouldqnter ws noteocorl'.odin either te$pit Rwiew of6e hdcncs to Chological MryDitg; Eagle Comy, Colcrado, prqaccd by Chssles S. Robirrolad A$ocidcs,IDe., in 1975, shows &dtc soils are sososiva Thpsc soils osy costain Eiotsts in vtiablc uors$ fu produpc secious &tb€nhl dO * **, roctrl orqlba stbtbcostat rc inoodfctwihftedoit. T]"ctr ccocctshouklbcuscdiDtF coocnete iu codrst ri6 q *oil. ekq $ese nrpo strn tl'Er rh€e soils cc susceptible to sr$sideucc atu. to eolrdoD Tle ur@yiqgb?dlock is ldaroon Fomatim, LPbeirecrb&Inc" rOI'NDATION RECOMMEI{DAIIONS The poposrd rridm smld bc srrypuod wih conrdoal t "c spr€ad frodngs, desigrcd &'r a naxinnn aUqerablc soil beoriag prcssuo of 3000 pd, fhe ftoriqgs, fu tbe cotile fr@dqdq should be phood mftc udislsbc4 b.drodi Wc rcoommad nrirnlrnrqr yiffi of 16 fuctcs fot thc coniauous frodngs and 2 ftet fos lbc isoled foodng paas- conduuous ftrnddm unlls shoulit bo refofurccd bp ud bot@ to rpm n unsryuted lcogrh d* least l0 ft* Arnintntru 9;4t inc.hcs otrbocldll covtt ic rccoEncndod &r &ogtfrotcctio of tbc footirg sub$ils. ne nMg,En agiuer slmdd ob*te tle fouilatiott ffibn to vcr,Ty tfu thc mil cott&iorlrs ot ug*et tb@nn flrfwdaion llrrrrlatio Tbe f@ddioncxcsvdia Sould be tcs ft@ qcardimqloils, nost, orgmics od stadiug wr- Tts m-sib soil alcfioo tpsoil, orgaic* rodmc&ftagnruts sallerth$ dx hchss' issltiltble bar$Ilnauisl. Void6 kftb&cercsndioo, duebrockrcnovat" shoutitbc fill.df,,ithlce cqmrec. Ihe frstitrgs shodd bo cormcncrloa alevd surfroe. ErcavaTloN DITFICTULTES ' Iloo thc coditiu ofris srodop bouldas obscrrcd ia rte tostpit, re ossone that the edffivztim c8 be dole witL hge excardrn naAigy. kpatrdion of nrrow urility tcnpbcs 'nighbsmorrdifirdf S"AECOITSTRUCTION The rffiEl oc€itc sofu, eroftsive of bpgoil otgeotca ce gdiable o grrypoqt lighty loadedsllbE-gradccognrlion Tbpnrtgredcfctheslab.on-gradccosrustionshouldbe pmof conpactcil t dctcgt ed r€norrc sofi spot* Ihcy should baold[ o\r€rcxcsyated soft spots and odprudershD fru with oe on.sib soit tee fion torpsoil ad org[ics, or ofter sritabla rnahial cmpacterlto 4mir'irnrrrr ef g5 pcrccotoffbcnoriurqsmdqdprroctddilsity LKP lFngr.eering,Inc. 5 (AsrMD-699). suitable matcrial shouldbe fiecaoa ftpsoil, or8sics anil rock &agneoa gl€atcrrhn3 iDsh. The consrcrG d.b Soutd be cocmed ovcr a ,l-iooh layer of clcao grgr GI cocsirfing of - 3/a hch gravel wtlh d lca$ 50% rstabcd q tho No. 4 sian ad tcs tto s pcrccat passiug 6c No.2(X) gievc. lloysbubninforoetbooocrao dab-oaradc grd scq? ao&ol joints aaoq'diugo tte Amcricqn Concet? Iastitre reCdrro[tr aad per tte reonmdciolg ofthc dcstgFer to rc&roe rl.n'ge due to $ialogc Tbo cmcr,ac slab shsuld be qarucrl fr,on te ftmduio uralls rail colws with cscpesiou johf O allow ftn indacndcc moveoot wi{hout oaudqg dssEgs RETAININGWALIS TLct sboutd dcsignforndationwrlls rctdning cse adretaioing smrcEses tbat rre laattysuporuAbresi* ocquhnleottrrl dcmill of 60 pcf forn'b-r€st" condition- I"cralty unrcsrrlncd sfu$frrcgftilEiniagrfu on-sie eatbshotr&lbe deyigd to rcsist an cqulvalent fluiil ;cosity of 40 prf St tp 'f'rctirrc" casa The above dcoig rcumnmdalids asslrrc &ained baolfiIl conditiols aad a horiadrl baffll sutfice. Wge bumns duc toi{hcd $mcftuts, wtidrt ofmpcry slocd cons&ucdon uatsids and aqfpneC, fuoliaed bar.lfll d by&rostdic prcssrre rhrc to useained b€o*ffll shouldbeincoaoracdin fto dcsien" lbsysbouldtry!o prEv€dtebdl@ of fudrosulic pessw,e bdind the nninirg walt 'UNDERDRAIIY SYSTEIIT ?eccH\iltE( conditions rro very conoo in fouddirns aonrmred oa bedrock To rc&rce tp ris} of sdace uloq idludagthe ftundatio ssbaoil (d tbc derdopou of a pemhcd vanr coaihim) hsallation of a fonnddon pcdretr &ain is recommcodod (see FiguscNo 2). Tbe fquddionpqtmdrrinshould cfiEist of atl-iu&di;metereoOmedFfuB sloped o a suitablo gravig oulct, or o e aq prop locarion The drsi! sbotild slope * 1/4 inch lJUf Fngin€ain&Inc. o 5 Pcr foot if floriblc * t IE of - t''ot ifrigftt pipc is u!cd, The botbm of the trcor:h a{accot to &oboting $odd bclioBdwirhapotycfrytonc noisurc buicrgtuod o tc frundstios qrall. Tho ds"ispiF sbotld bepbedoverlfoimoigrs bcricrqd covrrrcd eiftl rniqirnq ef f, infrss of -3l4 hch a*ful,rine gsm}o'atcrfut fucx.ilc Gvgn6 l4orl or equirralcc) shoEld be usd to corm rba tee-draining grEvel to Dse'ut siftdion md dqggiag of thc drsb. Tbs beldll eborcrhe drahstouldbcerutcmacrialu widrb 2 fterof{h3 gmrudsdccto gcveot a hril&p of hyeromic ptsuc. Tho rop orc foot of fu ' -d.fill -rr'drl shodd corist of a rclaively irycndous flL ThB bsrslt *luld slopc crey t@ the bdtdag, SIIT GRAI'INC AITD DRAINA@ A siu phwrs mt Evailslo fs rwiew clhls tiroc" Tbe folbrriqg reomnpod*ions e 8eo€ral in anre" rhc eib mrotoding rtF building smctue rboukl slqe away a,orn the builditrS iu dl direaions. A ufufmm ofl2 incler h the fir* l0 fccr it roco@€nitcd ia uryaEd &as, d the incies in trc 6r$ l0 frst in pcrcd aeas ItE bp of rbc gnrulff foudAion bectfllSouldtecorEredd&ararqinurrreflfootofrelaivr&irycrvionsAlto n&cc the poadal of sdaca uabr Atilbltilrg U fguddio s$soik. Sufice una n*ually &rbing qmil fu gopo*d tuildiry sie c ps,nancm ots, &orild be dtyruncd round od arr5r fmo ir !y rnr+q of ilnin4o srnles o ortr qprwed ndbod' Thc $cf,drriDs oi dowospoq should ',rreod ad disoargc betlDd tte lidts ofte bockfi[' &iqbrcmtt should tc comparctcrl at crclrr&c optim moisttre oonhtt to at hast 95% of te macimu staudard pr@r dariv uder pavcolat, sidema* ud prtio ueas and to at lcart 9015 offre nodnm sryld{d lhooh it"'rci?y tud., t nal*ryed r€as. Mecboical mrnhods ofcoupactiqrhoulil bc uscd. Do not puddlc thc found*iu ex,cavuion I.AV/I{IRMGATION It is notrocommodcd to iddrciqccst c,Ebrro ihe fouDdrtio[ soilsty tsraffing griukler sFcms noco thc brdilbg; Tlcinsrtraiu ofte spialltcr hcads stould iDcure rbd fKREngiuesiag; I!p, &c sprry irom ttE bds rill lor fan ui& I 0 feet of ftuddim wa[s, pq.hps c poio slabs. Iann n'IiSnrim rnrst bc c@otled. TIMNATION This rcpqt hrs Ueco prqceU aceoreing to lelly aaeperf prrftsdonrl Gooechaicat EngiBeEdag $aDdads ft6 cirrrit'.'rl6ftp{s of tcsi4g aDd tdt aonditims at rtris tima rhse is ao otbcr w@y dther aryrcssoC oi t-Ftied . lbfudfugsadrmrhiobofrrrisrqnrtarebaseilofic{rlqlondm, labcatory tcsdng of s'rn$,tes 66ya"6 aSl$e spocifc locationg Scra o ttc Locaio Sbt.fi, DrawingNo-l ad m asrynion sHed hfu &"cr soil condriqs a drrlocrions may rtry' vhi&nayaot bccmc widcd uoil the fuDddion cxcavetion is corylecd. fsoil qr utstcr coslitiotrssceu di&reatfiom thore dsscribcrlin fri. rqortw shold be coe@d inned[ate]y to rcctnlude the rrlcomnEoddior of tLic laport Tbis !*ct hss ba pcpceit ftr [bc csclusinc EsG of rft- roh Loke, forrhe specific rpplic*ion to ihc poposod rcsidcoce on rot l% Glcn Lpn subdivieio, Tou cf vai! Eagle Co6y,Colcdo- \Euwry2002[IfPlGrXpg3 12aru6"r** Simerely, Pofiovdn,PE fl(fnrrgtnccrbg, tnc. f (, # GREEN HIIJ. COURT NOIE rENHIL06A\O OVPA6'6 6E/@rL hgineering, Ine.Lfr rr. at ltd l'r'tmrtrn6n at E a''tr,. aw N 'aN Eutmil- ATO S,4f,,.€ Ltr,,frO,T UEURIUYtEs?Er/trs -t! Ugttt bom, eqrdy gnyot n'il,qngtlc smffionc ful€8 od Btom, gedy g vC ,ith sdrdatorre boulfus i Itr@ID: ll -&aaffiabttr5a4fiI - A*.Snnb 9?_ -,$hrd OqOrt wCpqrc - hbd rhfrtrt Contrrra E)-ZW - AiE r? drt ft. ffi'Siil.tL - LntU tJnnP, - furEUt *rbeU - Ao..n'frV sttEsqFACG EIPIORArIOIV foe cow Wr(nL un oE Fmr oF EAma,ruEntmB g. tt@ FAxtc(&tn,,nn G'NNNflD H.*rrE tr$n, dtEDlo lr€ FuruIDt nu,roruEHtstEt & nE GfiqNO U'A E PffiANT) &EE EAVA- V1 tcn uAU. U'H .ES NilN 8 FE (Do .r-r{CH UreEn AEffiAID F}E AEED 'O A STTAHE %NZET Ar Lt4- Pn fwr Fn nD&,E ArP AT uf pn FoorF& nEo rpE ctllt /ctbsEdlqcAr Engineering, Ine.lma aE Lfrt g3t'fi,. lptr F stadt oqr,rt c*etn Tract C and D: TOWN OF VAIL C/O FINANCE DEPT 75 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL, CO 81657 Attachment: Go)rtt9Fkroa ^P!-.r: a'i:..11 Fr-il.-i!!:--_-{ i!ii;itt: --''!!_:ili:-:r.',i:- _-, ! :::':i-{td rllillt\; -j;[l:i it:':l[;ffi;;;"-*t ;!;| ::;:rtri;;.i ;ii; ii;::itiaiiq iiiiiii:i; :i+:!:ii $iiiiu:i'ii:i; ;!iiiiili;i!t::i :l:i ii;l;li fii! i10llr >o-qFF5!-.E nf.!! E 'O 'E alu o:Fg -.EEF<< zvJ<ez .\i :ii!!it; Attachment: H MJL DEvELoPMENT lNc. PO BOX s026 EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 oFFICE (970\9264007 FAX (e70) e2640rr MOBTLE (9701471-1670 MF'MORANIIIIM VAIL TOWN COUNCU, IyIICHAEL J. I,AU'I'$RBAC,H APRIL 15,2OO4 APPDAL OF DESTGN RI'IVIEW BOARD APPROVAL LOT'I?, GLEN LYON SUBDIVISION My client, Mr. John Purclrasq who is also the owner of Lot I? at Glen Lyon, has s-sk€d me to provide , -t riuf ,u*ponsc to Mr, Barry Cunningham's appeal to a Town of Vail Design Rwiew Board llnnn;* oppror"ifor a siugle family residencc to bc located on the above reftrenced lot. Duriqg the mccting in wnicn approval was obtaincd, Mr. Cunningtrati'rrequested tbdtthe DRB reqgi-'e tha'u*e iauuse thc noilr building setUact from fiftecn fcet to thirty-five fbet to altow him a grcater buftr !et111-his e.xistirrg homc anl Mr, Purchase's proposed single-fsmily rcsidence. After conte'nrplating the DRB's input as wellas Mr. Cunningham's, we whole heartcdly agreed to provide a side setback of twemry-tlree.fect in ordcr to partially accommodate Mr. Cunningham as well as loosen the driveway and access circulation on the lot. tn addition to our twcnty-three foot setback and Mr. Cunningham's fffteen foot building sctbaok, an aclditional fifteen foot pedestrian easement continues lo separate the two structurcs. tlnfortunately, Mr. Cunningham is not satisfied. He is rcquesting that you ove,rride the DRB approval and require Mr. PurcbasJto relocate the residence whicb would allow Mr. Cunningham an addhional trnelvi feet of setback and btrffcr betwccn rcsidences. On somc lots this r€quc$t miglrt prove practlcal. Howcver, Mr, Purchase's tot is sloped within thc building envelope at no lesr !tt4 50%' , bonsequently, Mr. O:aninghan is requesting that you requirc us to move the resdence further up thc Sillsidc into - o.uu in whiJh the stopes approaoh 60%, The Town's potential liability ifthe residence were rCquired tobemovcd onto slope$gr€atefthan 50% seesrs staggering. Needlcontinue? L havc read Mr. Cunningham"s appeal letter and it oontains little more than support based on flawed argumenls, a paradox, and perilnal speculation. As to issues one and two, the survey w8s prcparcd by Attachment: I TO: FROM: DA'l'ltl: R.E: Dan Coroorur'r Eagle Vallcy Survey office which mncludsd that the majority if not di of thc tspcru on rlrc prop".ty *ur. "Trh* Jr"as"t, biighted, or dead. Ifis conclusion is confirmcd within a letter addressed to Mr. purshase from a certified arboiist and tbrester of which a oopy has beear forwarded to the Town's dwelopment staff. Mr. Cunningham additionatly wants to retain thc trEes located on the wost lot bounda.y adjar,ent ro lhe only "uiit"Ut. cul-du-sac access. If onc assumes that the driveway will be approximatcly twelve to thuiteen feet wide including shoulders urd the side hill slope is 507o or six to siven feet which mrst be retained both above and below the asphalt, Evrcn En optimist would 19t e,Q€ct any of those trecs to be savcd. The forester's later which is refcrenoed above atso confirms this, Within iszucs three and tbur, Mr. Cunningham paradoxically finds fault with our driveway layout. On the one lnnd, hc oomplains that our driveway is too long and that we are unneeessarily destroying trees with a covered parking, arca. He then seerningly concludes that he would be better senrcd if tlrc garage were locatsd oloscr to the cul-du-sac anA pariO-oxically oloser to his home. Looating thc gange adjacent to the cul-du-sac would obviously destroythe same stand of trees as well as confine our required guest parking to the cul-du-sac. Despite Mr. iunningham's skepticism contained in issue fivg the GRFA has ileen c,ilculatcd and fully compl'ies with the lot allowances while all crawl spaces will bc oonstruct€d to oomply with Town requirements, Further, we resent the implioation that we are intending to dwiate either no*oi in the future fiom the approved plans, Lastly, our DRB submittal was oomplcte per the DRB submittal guidelincs, Currently, Mr. Purchase has agrecd to incur the sizable cost of additional and elwated retaining walts which will now be required atong each perimeter of the residence. He has furthcr agreed to an overatl driveway slopc which has bccn substantially increased fiom the original submittal wlrich rneasured f ess than 2o/olo a+/o slope for thc first twenty f""i o*oy from the culdu-sac and t}e last thirty ficet in front of thc garage cloors and a middle portion of 8%. Mr. Cunningham has proposed a ten to_twelve pcrce'nt treateO-arivcumy slope from the cul-du-sac to the garage doors to support his request, Ho further proposes that we could lissen that driveway slope ifwe expanded the distance betwecn the anival and cntry floor levels from the current ten feet belwccn floors to twelve to fourteen feet. He oveilooks thc requirement thaf additionat floor to floor distance would impaA the conformance of our roof ridge elwations and our interior floor plan stalr layouts. I must conour that trtt, Cunningham has accurately interpretcd in his first paragraph that neither thi lot owner nor I am interested in assuming the perhaps substantial additional rtsk "nd tsi of moving the residenae further up the increasingty steeper hillsidc in ordcr to allow a further buffer bctween the two ttsidences. In summary, aftcr rclocating the residenqe at a substantial etcPeose, Mr. Purchase hrs more than sati$lied rhe Townis setback requircments and has providcd an ample addilional buffer' Furthet, Mr. purchasc's construstion financing is in place and he is ready to proceed. A requirement to mow th€ residence further up the hillsidc witl prove unduly expcnsive and will create additional risk for him and thc Town, I urge you ro reject the appeal. Thank you in advanse for oonsidering my response to Mr- Cunningham's issucs and plcasc fccl free to cortEct mc if you have any questions or desiro fiirthcr information. "",(*rrGennett, Town of Vail Community f)welopment Deperffirent John Purchase Wendell B. Porterfteld. Jr. Rpr l5 d4 OBTOBT " f; Ftbsvr Fonrrtrrr rho o9?o -.tEg - 4a I I p.1 A Cut Above Forestry, Inc. aFchilzfng on llr,r s.rvffi ,nd Gilrtuntng April 1,20Or *. JohnPr|d|| o75.MPebhI,r.Vt,@ 8r€ft RE: Ttrc d l3'to Glcailn Cqlrt Dcailr. Ptrifiac, ns* yril, Fr conffi? A O|t Affil Fffi F df€lr totlt |n. cf| tG- A yotl raCud h ourljilldr z0,z(Il.j Ftst di,rtildr, I trpacFd thc8Eil atyour PlopG{Ulsffi i t31O Glurhll Corrt h ttlc Cd Oub atH h \rfl. CdqE b. IXrir1g orrdn triln you aqrrnd aaso ff UE eS gd rndnt lfigily of thc -Crlm.trc*q||F b|hf qtJdcof lhccrofffirtterE. YGU h|dtpcdJ@ttantbl tlialr-c|hrs0t-*bdF Erf. Aardl[bqtftlbntt tEtNtlcblt tl b conoffi ||Dout frtt.r i*re- nrnoifoi enC UorfO re nr lEt. tdo*d nrUr |? lr O.r kdr gl. 2m{ tqr stltlEltAqr^bF frl*t b prfora r rb hf.ohr b.u|lrb lE hE|U rtt ot t|E €.ilfE rH !|d lttc poffil fnCU or*udat -flE lt dl^ O|. tfc t* cr fr milr * ot6 lritt! .itf,ltF You -t|f n nry trub br prr-l| b youhlffrbrm. I DgH, dhrct r radrd hrlfE cdiunrfi qorld rt 4,5 frct 6src t !'sttd' Ot A9|I l. Aa I r* rar lhl5| L.lh.hh, FU diirrlb, b bdl {|] iE tl, rt l tt dlrt|l fr Uir. tlc prsvftrr, ffirrrilorr prirtrlr6 b l't| lotld fho pb'|rd c.rffirrdn. ffr plqrru f I dd * hdd Et U.S.FA H b rE lailr r|d dlt dopd Fe.4G. tre rioni ani r*. th pgp{U tE rdfilt e+.dt16 - u6y lb.prdt|1 dof4 tL6...ftg 4ot3. TIE hb lqbd di! ild of a oosld rc. trrc drrrotrdofnrrrtilr|n cg|!iludtE. tfixft.l nrt lstr sil rci'ny rld o'' nccdrdy rfiffiG rlt r*. '[', ddls trt tFlEt -fl!'u&f, b rul irt-ffoina run utnr crru6l rr rE ffi To r3lirrun5drb lt3 *.p rlop.. .n E fuc lrrinnt d rl b f,ilud ar tr dornlil di din dfvmy. Lodgf* ts (Pfl|sffi) fl.l Aan (]igd.| trilrburl eir Ftr tn.qh gru*t qr'sr ita scvre of-l: 4*r rrdid a dyhgt ndy fiun Erg lEr d emr -th!t -t Dr€ ilEFFA f Uf Fr b.E lEdlt. Erlglr FL ffi .4pg, n titod 66rnfta 1rt-ett1 a iGtti.i Ocrl tsrU liojg ilbcldrd0t mqmrln pite bede. So|ilG of t'|3 Sn tuua rldd iopa rrcl a gr,Grd il irtff ffir ofeaporE €nk€r. Of f|€ 14 s'.rrx| D|ET. Art|dglC[r Ftgtil Ct'! rE ItE' rli S{Er- G in|:E.r lDSi{) :, E atG cd. f nel gn lu tnt | q'lrrt * ra H. 2 il ortupF|rt !5 |rYt F ird*fft', t E a lH ffirl hr r rt*t *aa bP fi.l 3 (utE tHt ftcftd) ||l tffidddrE bfrcnh. O|rf hgpodqrton. PO. tox 213! Ellckmildgil 970-,f59{1t4 Oounty Fpr lE Oil O8: Olr , n Fbsvr FoF.ltFU, Ino 9?O-+63-a818 p.E Gillrry. irr totn* phr tn hc*t noilr C ltn md dF !Ir-h !!r!o-edcpmtg-. iln arLrregt lrr c aprsnnrlt- ai I ncn n tilr, SG# r|' tr . qw!: rpilll c lO'ii r1d i grga;r J;. eeg*" h drg' rrd+ 6r 1a ffi hdry, fftt gfoull ldglFb FE tls ln ftt Vbi ele. Acpor*re b tt .b p54 tr gr* rr br rsd bt s-{bcr.n tE no.t| r&F of ll| .ilt try- rtri iOer-t sy1;fu ril f-r;e tqrr 3{!t D iO -ftct Elil ot !E groFrq 11. | flt cfliond rilll l Gba ![ Eldoo ul GqF b ||a lr} E |!|l f OC rlt|l f ilOtH| uoia fi-[! afie cu'eto'r { .g'6 b ';trr 3 Hotr. g.... Ldg+ob PIf fE "r-t;E - blit*E srgmrt dr dl- h ltr wrtd- RrrE'-g 'r tt'y uE x'il .il;;51lr-n*;g16-ffi-tmi tr6n 1tr.pqr gqrilH q 1rgr flmil3 rilrrcrtg EE Crlil-R.d-zorfi-irina nrr rur ffi rnd-trnn ittl t#riril tr* tdl bm E !!!€t ai t||tr of rst 6 lol fit|rr h ltgh wlr$- Thr ffirly tffid L b tlplrl mvgbn tilth A 0F fttlff an an drb d fi. tlr' For ;lirrdr: rfu mrmon r|Eg er trtttttn 5 H ot tF tuttk riD e 12' drnsEr hte Thb E ""|y;-;;d,tr- T ccid.m : flr flEr tn o! *b fr trr. trc orb d-E € rqr b Incrgased- stuctrry *rrrg iE ttrs i r Ffftt h ilb ru Hr d llr m'gl* d "ilrsw:rrtlvb thc naoftofa mu*. Si dilrfihe $f ld iUd.|r\ fittullo ttq|j,r0b lry9l' lhr ffi;fiL-;iltr'Ib gjj 1!| c6.lir n j11c pa r inc r !r Fr gtoFrtt fia ule n*nEoftho€c. I n rrv d#.bg offin lhc lxr FlFw fit (l|tf td frl ls rtr||n rtmE fil|lf+- of i#;fiffi;ffi,dcfiffi;id-Jii snc Jsar*ucrm b ilduc tr *1 dpctsd-hlrr itaffi Crnra t ro rdr3g5 d;*- rry OrO ryt q' F1 ffi trt 11 s5 ;t*a,tg'frtHdlr Inr qr lhcuCrllrG of lb fut|'l-r.E!ttt' Pbsa sE m rt r|y qrbr t gto{€odt€a-WaLFE*llcffiC.rillrdAtbrBtlRt{196 Effi Fhct0ardbilT Rrmovc if,excavetioa is cl'os€cb tsGE Tbrn 5x. t Gitiort Roct Zf,t! Ttp rrn utdc r lr.. ikl [rry @uffi rs lla Appeele Form Dsp tnent of Conmufi Dcvarernant 75 Scrh mrf Rord, tti, Cdorrdo !1657|.l: 970,t79,2ue fu: 970.1t9.2a52 rED: wwrr.vtigov.qr Grr.|rl lrfr|'|t.ddr! Itt', 9T b quecd b lllrrp m rppcar or ! st fi, Dcrr$ Rfirew brd, a prannrE and arvnmm.ntrlcomrlsdon aftlory'Hshn, A oomphb fqm and mdat€d r€qlrEmnts musl be e rrmltd b thcorimunity Dardopmert DepNnryicrrt ldsrln tventy (20) budne$ &yr of tnr dlcplJtEd acdalvdeislon &||o|t/Dccblcn tohg 4prrledl Th€ fEbn Rwiew Eqrrd ffiyd orf DRE0+lDl6. fic furEt'rse Ecddilce rt 3 adiar urls a llntl do.ovrt of I rfr sird*,frmlly r:dd?nce O rgs: Jotn rrd t ufr A"6eF. O6.clolrr: Mldrad t tsrbci- Ardrttd: S&ryar ruCgl. _. Dror ot Acilotr/Dcidol: rrh i rflH lord or l9ttt D.|an ,tndarlng ecfoo/doddur:O6ion Rei/lerv goJd Ooo thlr rpgcrl InvolUt. .pccinc Frrd ot bnd? ycr lf yrr, rrc yo|| l| dFat rroD.rtv orrcr? yg il||ttgqtAlFlmqo: - Barfl E. o.h4rmham tlrJq|ddrrr y'\Jlncmore Dd!B, 6ol{td-. CO flI3(n . FEGd Ad&r- I|t VaI: r3rq Gresnl|lt Ourt Ptuan 3u3-iA7-DQ -- - -..- ttil mEbdo|| of AtP|lbrq.) tppiry tn vr_I:fuMMslon: Ghn L'/fll - AppGl.'|qr) 3i gnrtrr{r)r (tftad a fin of Cgrrai.rct lf ncr spscr S|lrdlDlR4rft||nbrl. Or a r€Fr.t! lhEct or segrra0e $eais c, p8prr, F vlde a detitld a@nrtion d luv you .r! .n 'aggriet/rd or ldvtrsly aftcd pcrnn'. 2. On a r.prr!! *rcct or eeparato 4tEb of p!p.r, sFdfy the pr*jsc nrture of th. afcal. PlaDse cltl lpodAc oodo cdtons havlrE r€ldare bo the rctofl bring appted. 3. Pron& r llst d namca End dre6E€s (bdr miiling lrd phyeril 0ddr€ss6 In vall) of tll otrn€t! of gtqerty who ,7e t,re subEt of ttre rppcil and al e4ecrfit fDperty Ol.'l€ts (lndudlrB o|rnats rvhcBe pmp€iler arc sqratcd film fie eubl5 proprty by t rlghtt'*ty, 5tttm, r odrer httftinlng b!nl6). 4. Prui,lde sbmpcd, rddrssrd ovrbpe for ach goporty *lrs lishd in (3.). REASE StFiin ftE mRvl AlO NI SIJBi'IFrAL RFQIIREI,E{TS Ttl: lot ril 0F vA\ DcHf,rItlGt{T oF coMtluNlTv DEVELOPi4R{T, 75 SOUTH FnO rA6E ROAD, vrtr, @LoR^DO 8r6s7. st5ilLYoitlort? ,rrtt I v AoDmoMLsErsA{oLopEA}rALysrB l: fuv- O B rtpffi- R Fytsia .*gr E,-Elrrfldr -rrrrno *ttfot*t" FADDlrlot{AL GETBAGK o a, tA, r's ,trolllAsTERwito\rEriEnT o r-0, i6, fr,tllWEF IYAST OOLUilN USa' tr6.t.g ' rrdZ,S , 1-6.s , u?qER wEsr coRNER arn . c1rlo, aiai:o. ait!:t , ItfET RFE U, 1f.3, '25',- -;S; DtsrAt{cE BETIvEEN polNTc 60, Jo, 50 , ai.A\TERAGE SLOPE 1215 is% j0% s0.6RfEE lN FLgoR HEtGt{T aO , AO, tO; 6; fNlTtAr DEFtct? AT UPFER rroor r.EvEl (l) . (O) ' e,6, , 1O.S; , ADg: DRIVEWAYGAIN O' i.g. 'S,Ai b.i'NE?DEFtclT .. (1)' (r.r), e.a, re.el,sLoPeAT UFpER LEIleL so* ao*.'sr* flqEllorry.oou *tr**tf*t*i cADDInOfiA! 9ETBACK 0 t-. l1t rS,NoRtHEAsrERLyrrrovEtrENT o rb, 16, x,, 9!N!F! oF LOWER COt UUNS S15C' !150. !t@.6, 8111.5'cEilTER oF uppeR LEvEt sroT' !1s1, 819i1.5. srC_s.NEIRIEE 31, gil' gil, ge; DfSTAI{CE BETWEETi| potHtt er ' 01 , el , ai ,A\GRAOESI€PE t1.c79f 5496 0t* xrRfsE rN Ft.ooRlfErcr.rr 2E-tt, a,at, zsiii. a5t , n'rmAl oeHotr^r upp€F rlooR lErEr 6.!S) , (l.g!) , p.Sg) , (10.67) , AOO: DRtlrEwAYcAtN o" 'ai, .6.3; . aiiNFr oEFGfr F_.i-1 , F,ar), 6,COl , (5.t . 8IOFEAT UPFER LEVE! '5{)'6 5{f,. Si AL?ERIA?IVEtErtrrtiltr A E0 6', 12'0 t0, 10. 8158 ' 9155.3, E167.6'8170,5' 9170.5 , !t!.|.5 . 2N.3' 4' 21'.59' 60' Eg I ag?[ .o,t7% .0.a?*20', a, 20't,t' .5' (1.O'0' {.9, 5.9'e.5' 5.a' 3.!'57t6 57t6 TO 601r EiarrEt.ErrA?tot ADDMOilALSETEACK I{OR|TT{EA9TERLY ilOIGr'ENT Lc'rlrEn EASTCOLITilN UPPETT EAET CORIICR I{ETR|8E DIST t{CE Emi/EEttl pONTe AI'ERACESI.OFE RlsE lttlflInRHHOIrf NM^t OEFICI' AT UPP€i FLOON LEVET 'ADD: ORI\TEWAY€AtN I{E?DEFICIT SLOPEATI'PFER TEVEL DBII,EWAYA]IIALYSI8 D|ATA'{CE TO CANA(IE FlRgf l0FEETAT'l* TASTOO FEETAT''3 REIAINERATfr iAICE OAiAOTILMR t tAll GIME-1TL! K tt f C v ,v tv t.v6t*, cAtcvLhf2oal c 15, 20' Elgg' 8r&t'zl' tg' 40.6? 16n' (3)' 6.0. 2.4'. to' 0.4 1,2 L 6,C 18' Q' 0.'l 0.41,2 1,2!.t_ tL 'f.9 5.4 n' td udlsizr vaaz sl 'reLJ gVAL gLV Ae6 : '0N fNOHd 0(Iutnl0f,-"lur I du3 -13fT9=S : l^l08l FAXTO: MksLafierbaoh FA)( NIIMBER: 970'925-401 1 FAX FROM: BarrY Crmningham FA)( NIJMBER: 970'223-5010 I am attaohing a layout with markingS where I thinh you are measuring *West Elev'diOn'" ;MiA-poiot ni*trioa- *a f".t ei"tation" Did I iocate them conectly? Yoru trble oyr-ttio a.*ti* betwea thc gErago and the living roorr floorjs 20 feet, but thc plans have elelations at tl60 and tl8l, i.e. 2l f€ct. Which ig corast? Rclative to your ErstElevation table you show a "deficit at upper floo1lwel" of (3.5) ft', (4) ft., (4) fi., and (4) ft. DgE:tg neanepggitivc em.ourt instead o:f g deficit? For exampli i'Existing" has a floorheigtn of 8181 with grormd at 8176.5, i.e' pontive. Per our telcphone cowprsation if pu really want yoru east deck as close to Erad€ as possible you could achieve that by mating t}c house as wc discusse4 rryhich would hclp both the owner and mo. It wordd also tsrd to sbaightm out yorn drivcway/gaagp entran€€. Rslativc to yow Mid-point Elevation tablg I cannot undcrstaad your dofioits. I ttthk your'Eristingi' doficit is 2 feet ard column C is a "deficit" of 4,33 fe$. It I am inconect, plcaec tellnewhy. Since you are naking d€,sigo ohangss based on your table, pleasc get back to me as $on as poscible. It is very unfortrmate you could not meet with me yesterday at the propr;rfi, It really thinls the final site location should bc bascd on bryth pnvacy qnd saving th€ most na,urc trees not just arbitrarily picking a number lilcc 8 fr. to 9 ft, Having thc house sibd back in the woods rathcr than crammed in bcsido my bor:se should greatly earhance its value, 8s r,vas so eloqucndy staFd by the lady on the Design Rcview Board. rS/g\A^ "3ocutffio}lullduS l3no3s : l^loulEd t^fdgs:zr ,^az sl 'Jevl gral gLV Al5 : 'Ch't fNoHd GLENLYONLOTl? O ADOITIONAL SETAACX t SLOPE AMLYSIS MARCH Z.zO04 ITEIB.EUATIQT ADDfNONAL SETBAgK NORTI{EAATERLY MOVEMENT Lol/TEB WE€T COLUTTIN IJFFER YVESTCORilER NETRISE OISTANCE EETWEEN POINTS AT/ERAGE 6IOPE RISE IN FLOORTIEIGHT DEfICITA? UPFER FUNR tEtGL $T'PE AT UPPER I€VEL rqPo${TELEyarErl ADDITIO}{AL OETAIOK NORTHEA8TERLY ITOVEIIENT LqYYER WES' @IUTIN UFFER YI'EET CORNER I{ET RI6G D|Ef TAi{CE EETWEEITI FO I NT8 AV'ER^CEELOPE RTBE IN FI.OCN HEGI.IT T'EFICIT AT UPPER FLOOi LEI'€L SLOPEAT UPFERLET/EL E$IJELA\rArtOt ADDIROT{AL EETEAOK NORNEAgTERLY iTOVET'EfW LOIIERlirEsT colum{ IJPPER WEST CORNER T{ETFI6C DISTANoE EETWEEN POINTS A\GRAGE 6LOPE FISE II{ FLOOR IGTGIIT OEFICfTAY UFFEi FTOOR IIVET SI.OPEAT IJPPER TEVEL' ALIERI{ATN|E3 EE$UE A E0 9' 12'0 0' 16'El59' 0t!0' B10i!.t'meo' 8184' ElE7.5' 21 ', 21', 8'60' 50', S0'1nt #% 50t6m' 20' 20'(1)' (4)' (s)'5016 50%- s3% afErtilATn EsEilaflfro a E0' 12'g' l0'fi50' 0100-5'sleo' 81eS.A' se' 6t' 52.5 r4,A7' n.m' (8.33)' , (C.gs)' 54% -5e$ AL'ER'TA?IYE3 0 0 E166'ua?''01 ' 61 ' 5r-6? * 4.6it' o.g3)' 50i6 39',6l' il% e 15', e0' Elfits', 0t86.5' 25' 50' SOYa 20' (5)', It5' 20' tt61.t ' ale4.5' 33' Gl' 5at6 8,A7', (e.33)' c 15'A'' t16e' 81E3'u' 59', a0.67 %u'(.)' EXrsfl|l(r A E0 6' 12' 0 8r lE'E153' 8154-5', 8157.5' Et7g.5' 9176,6', ElE1.5'23.S' 21' A'50' 5e' 59'40!6 {p,E??i .0.67 %20' N', ?0'(es)' (4)' (0'5?j6 5?t6 TO0sl6 i o(uulr0f,-"lulldu3 -]Tlofs : t^loulzd Hd8s:zr v@ae sl 'JeA 9V8L gLV Aa6 : 'ON 3NOHd TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST (Request form must be given to the Secretary to the Town Manager by 4:00 p.m. Wednesdavs.) MEETING DATE: April 20. 2004 (Prepare a separate Agenda Request for each agenda item. lf the agenda item will be discussed at both a Work Session and an Evening Meeting, be certain to check both boxes in this section and indicate time needed during each meeting.) WorK Session TIME NEEDED : Evening Meeting TIME NEEDED: 30 minutes Site Visit TIME NEEDED : 5 minutes WILL THERE BE A PRESENTATION ON THIS AGENDA ITEM BY NON-TOV STAFF? NO.X YES. Specifics: WILL THE PRESENTATION OF THIS AGENDA ITEM REQUIRE ANY SPECIAL EQUIPMENT, i.e. overhead projector, etc.?_x_ No. YES. Specifics: WILL THERE BE MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET FOR THIS ITEM? NO. _x_ YES. lf yes, is the material also for public distribution?x Yes. No. ITEM/TOPIG: Appeal of the March 17, 2004 Design Review Board (DRB) approval with conditions of a proposal to build a new single family residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon, by the owner of lot 24B, Glen Lyon, Mr. Barry Cunningham. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold, uphold with conditions, or modify the DRB's approval with conditions of a new single family residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourVLot 17, Glen Lyon BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On March 17,2004, the DRB approved with conditions an application, by Mr. John Purchase, to build a new single family residence on his property, Lot 17 of the Glen Lyon Subdivision. The DRB's condition of approval was formulated based on the testimony provided by the appellant, Mr. Barry Cunningham, who stated during the public hearing held on the aforementioned date that the proposed structure would have negative impacts on the enjoyment of his property due to its proximity to the property line shared by lots 17 and 248. Despite the fact that Mr. Purchase's original plan had the structure within the required building envelope, the DRB imposed a condition that calls for the structure to be located 8'-9' back from the original location on-site. The DRB created and imposed the condition upon the applicant to address the issues raised by the appellant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the DRB's approval with conditions of the proposed new residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourVlot 17. Glen Lvon. Matthew R Gennett, Community Development Department Attachment AtlI|ltllrrF6n\aiAFv.j e\4f!iIiH{}!rIfitI F 6 di\J:'/ 8.t,t= !- r-r art - lftz 'j 'z II 6i aI ! Ii .:..K #tttt ('q o. fr R 5 I i I I i \:Wl,'ii'3t\i, '."11l^ ) . /("\,i Ki: ; .-]-ri'--,t-'i.' i..'.' ..,*\.:r' $.,'' S: : :'''\l' -:..,1': 1$:.: *\; .,S :." ;,'"\i.'.\:..;.\ _"i :i: j:5,,,' . . .' .._) /-=l- .i.::\ i :i : l:.' {.\iiji . .[f *\..^ t[ r ii ., :i.r. ... : :.+'t i\::,li t[ ..r. I :, ; : t lri::1.\i:Nfi\t.i\i iiiitr.Ns\NN -'.'. '..1).-1.'--'>1') ),rt r.''- litliiiii i:iE PURC}IASE RESIDENCEliiiiiiti o Attachment Bo Jarl t5I t- E\"it;|r' (. mt. ntr z !r:l II {g I} :$ rh nI PURCHASE RESIDENCE LOl' T7. GLSN LYON SUBDTVISION IFrt+glEFlriiiii\(\iT cIt 6Z rIit trtvl t. I z U) c 5vl s R.l z 1/ ,lt! I tl I I I E F tgli It I J I I I I il til l8 l{ I o I I \, I \ I ti lklHlu I :l I I I I I.l I'I I I I I I l I I Il, I I I .l I I lrl IF IFh HFHJ lJ i hhFlspl2FIFFtflc lc I lr li I Fl5F lilFt$FldtFtrltt ilrl t!It I ,il, ilitc!l rli; I l5tfi F tf t{ ia (.ll II rl c'g ill cl:l iliillililillil|fit PURC}TASE RESIDENCE LOT 1', OI.EN LYON SUBDIVISTON vNr. coLoRADO o Ittr lst9 ti|;trFlilq lFtir toti ts lloll ?.,x r i IOI4'NT) Appeals Form Attachment: C RECEIVED :' t.1l\/!ilt'd Depaftment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teli 970.479.7739 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: This form is required for filing an appeal of a Staff, Design Review Board, or Planning and Environmental Commission action/decision. A complete form and associated requirements must be submitted to the Community Development Department within twenty (20) business days of the disputed action/decision. Action/Decision being appealed: The Desiqn Review Board aooroval of DRB04-0016. the Purchase Residence. This action was a final approval of a new sinole-familv residence. Owners: John and Laura Purchase, Developer: Michael Lauterbach. Architect: Steven Riden Date of Action/Decision: March 3. 2004 Board or Staff person rendering action/decision: Desion Review Board Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land? yes If yes, are you an adjacent property owner? Yes not withstanding Tract C Name of Appellant(s): Barrv E. Cunninqham Mailing Address: 271 Anemone Drive. Boulder. CO 80302 Phonet 3O3-947-2749 Physical Address in Vail:1319 Greenhill Court Legal DescripUon of Appellant(s) Propefi in Vail: Lot: 248 Block:- Subdivision: Glen Lyon Appellant(s) Signature(s): Serp .F-. "... *+.+ocla.( . (Attach a list of signatures if more space is required). Submittal Requirements: 1. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, provide a detailed explanation of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person". 2. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, specifo the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appealed. 3. Provide a list of names and addresses (both mailing and physical addresses in Vail) of all owners of property who are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including owners whose properties are separated from the subject property by a right-of-way, stream, or other intervening barrier). 4. Provide stamped, addressed envelopes for each property owner listed in (3.). PLEASE SUBI4IT THIS FORN4 AND ALL SUBM||TAL REQUIREMENTS TO: TOWN OF VAIL, DEPARTIYENT OF COMN4UN]TY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLOMDO 81657. For Offrce Use Only: *." *"."r*, j'zz-o\ ptanner: AG Project No.: ?RJ O{' oOt: oo ,'kcrnA I rrfroIrq^ff-. Tl"*e'?R- 2- otffe^/s r"t/ [L,r Qnit* - )tt'- t/Pl',lihJr"-" - /)Plft'tDnZ-,ffi Attachment D Appeal of a Design Review Board Approval for the Purchase Residence (DRB04-00f 6) Supplemental Information - As required by appeal form Subject Property: Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, 1310 Greenhill Court Appellant: Barry Cunningham is the appellant. Mr. Cunningham owns the adjoining lot (Lot 24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision) to the subject property (Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision). The appellant is an aggrieved and adversely affected person as his home is located adjacent to the subject property and relies upon existing trees (which would be destroyed by the proposed project) for protection from development on Lot 17. The Purchase residence as approved will have an adverse effect on Mr. Cunningham's property, the immediate environment, and the quiet enjoyment of his home to a degree that exceeds the general interest in community good shared by all persons. Mr. Cunningham has standing to file this appeal and is an aggrieved or adversely affected person as defined by Section 12-3-3 ofthe Town Code. Nature of Appeal: Mr. Purchase, working with Michael Lauterbach and Steven Riden, has received approval from the Design Review Board for a new single-family home located at the end of Greenhill Court, in the Glen Lyon Subdivision. This approval was granted on March 3, 2004. The appellant, Barry Cunningham, owns the home next door to the Purchase property, at 1310 Greenhill Court. Mr. Cunningham only became aware of the proposed development of this site a week prior to the March 3,2004 hearing. Mr. Cunningham reviewed the proposed plans and had several conversations with Michael Lauterbach, the applicant's representative, about making some changes to the plan that would improve the buffer between the two homes and save a significant number of trees on the property. Mr. Cunningham also discussed with Michael Lauterbach about the impacts of the circular driveway on the mature trees on the west end of the lot. There were some assurances made by Mr. Lauterbach that have not been reflected in the proposed development plans. Mr. Cunningham tried to resolve his issues with the Purchase's representative, Michael Lauterbach, prior to the Design Review Board approval of the project and subsequent to that approval to avoid filing this appeal. The owner's representatlve was uncommunicative and could not provide any assurances that the issues raised would be addressed by the owner. Therefore, this appeal was necessary due to certain deficiencies in required documentation and errors made by the Design Review Board and/or Town staff in their approval of the project. Below is a list ofspecific issues that should have been addressed that were not: Issue 1: Survey Section l2-ll-4 Material to be Submitted; Procedure; subsection C, 1, requires a survey to be submitted, The survey is required to show existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of four inches or more at one foot above natural grade. The survey submitted by the applicant only includes "coniferous" trees (i.e., Evergreens). There are numerous large Aspen trees on the properlry with diameters exceeding 4". The Town Code makes no exclusion for Aspen trees. Therefore the applicant did not provide the required submittal materials and the Design Review Board should therefore not have taken action on the proposal until such required information was provided. This insufficiency was brought to the attention of staff and the Design Review Board (DRB) prior to the approval of the project on March 3,2004 by Mr. Cunningham to no avail. Without the identification of the Aspens, it is impossible to evaluate the proposed impacts, or after construction, the actual impact of the development activity on this important neighborhood asset. Issue 2: Trees There is a cluster of large Aspens located along the lower portion (west side) of the subject property that were not depicted on the fiee survey. Had those trees been properly depicted we believe the DRB would have considered these valuable frees that form a natural buffer between Mr. Cunningham's home and the proposed home. Section 10 of the Development Standards Handbook states that the location of structures should be such that it limits the removal of trees and is responsive to the topography. Additionally, the intent ofthe landscape plan is to "preserve and enhance the natural landscape character of the area in which it is located." This section also states "the Design Review Board may designate allowable limits of construction activity and require physical barriers in order to preserve significant natural features and vegetation upon a site." The DRB placed a condition on the approval of this project requiring the applicant to move the proposed home an additional 8' - 9' away from the west property line. This number was arrived at arbitrarily and instead should have been based upon the location of mature trees. Had the DRB based the condition upon the natural vegetation located on the site it should have required the home be setback an additional 15' based on the location of mature vegetation instead of 8' -9'. Setting the home back a total of 30' fiom the west lot line would not have resulted in significant impacts to the design of the home, retaining walls, or driveway grade. Therefore, the DRB erred when approving the project due to the lack of consideration of the impacts to mafure tre€s on the property that form a natural buffer to adjacent properties. Issue 3:Drivewav Lavout Section 10 of the Development Standards Handbook states that access ways shall be responsive to the existing topography ofa site. The proposed plan includes an open-air covered parking area for four cars and an expansive driveway and auto- court, which creates the need for retaining walls and impacts large stands of mature trees. The width of the drivervay is inconsistent with the design guidelines, which require that impacts to topography and trees should be minimized. A review of other driveways along Greenhill Court reveals that this rs only home that contains an expansive auto-court and an open-air covered parking area. Therefore, the proposed driveway, auto-court, and covered parking area are out ofcharacter for the neighborhood. An adequate driveway can be designed to reduce impacts to both topography and trees. The DRB erred rvhen approving this project due to the impacts of the driveway to trees, the impacts to natural topography, and the necessity for tall retaining walls almost on the lot line to retain the auto-court. Issue 4:Driveway Functionality The owner has designed a home that is elevated on piers and contains a Earuge buried deep beneath the home. Access to the garage and designated parking spaces make it nearly impossible for a car to back dorvn the driveway or turnaround on site and exit the driveway. The Development Standards Handbook requires that driveways be designed as to allow free and unobstructed access to and from the site. The plan approved by the DRB does not allow for adequate vehicular maneuverability. The access to the site can be greatly improved by rotating the home clock-wise (to the east) to line-up more closely with existing grades. This rotation would also allow more trees to be preserved on the west side of the lot, improve access to the garage, and reduce impacts to topography and the need for extensive retaining walls. The DRB ened in its approval of the plans as it did not adequately evaluate the garageiparking accessibility. Issue 5:GRFAiBulk and Mass Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) and the Town's Design Guidelines were developed by the Town to help control bulk and mass of structures along with other tools such as limitations on site coverage, landscape area, and building height. The first element noticed when reviewing the applicant's plans was the extensive area being created under the home. In addition to an enclosed two-car garage buried under the building, there is approximately another 2,000 sq. ft of open area and areas labeled crawlspace. The other issue noticed was the additional driveway that approaches the home on the west side. The bulk and mass of the home had been purposely raised an entire story in order to convert the lower-level of the home to livable area either illegally or subsequent to the Town's approval of changes to the GRFA regulations being championed by the applicant's architect, Steven Riden. Ifone reviews the plans closely, it becomes apparent that the applicant intends to move the garage to the front of the home in the future and access that garage from the driveway entering the building from the west. This would seem to be the most logical place to locate the garage rather than driving below an elevated building to an enclosed garage space in the rear. Once the garage is relocated, it then becomes very easy to convert the remaining 2,000 sq. ft. "void space" to livable area. The DRB and/or the Town staff erred when approving these plans as the plans violate the purpose and intent of Title 12, Chapter 15, Sections 12-15-l and 12- 15-3. Section 12-15-3,1, d. states that the following can be excluded from GRFA: "roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or similar features with no more than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space..." The lower level of this building is more characteristic ofa basement then it is a deck, porch, terrace, or patio. This area should have been considered GRFA and, once considered as GRFA, the proposed structure is approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in excess of the allowable GRFA for this lot. Issue 6: Excessive Slopes Section 12-21-14, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excessive Slopes, Title 12, Chapter 2l , of the Town Code requires that when a house and driveway are proposed with average grades in excess of30%0, a soils and foundation investigation be submitted with a DRB application. This lot has grades in excess of 30% yet no soils and foundation report were provided to the Town prior to March 3,2004. Therefore, Town staff and/or the DRB erred in its approval of the project as no such report was provided by the applicant. Action Requested of the Town Council: The appellant requests: l. That Town Council overtum the DRB approval of DRB04-0016 (Purchase Residence); 2. That the application not be heard by the DRB again until such time as all of the submittal requirements are complete and accurate and until such time as the home has been redesigned to meet Town Code with respect to GRFA; 3. That the Town Council find that the lower level of the home is not an area that can be excluded from the GRFA calculation and therefore the applicant must redesign the home to comply rvith the definition of GRFA; and 4. That the Town Council direct the DRB to evaluate the impacts to trees on the west end of the site adjacent toLot24 and that the DRB minimize the impacts to the stand of mature trees in this area by providing at least a 30'construction fiee zone (i.e., no buildings or driveways). Attachment: E THIS ITEM MAY EFFEGT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-3, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 6:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: ITEM/TOPIG: An appeal of the Town of Vail Design Review Board approval, with one condition, of a new single family residence, located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Appellant: Barry CunninghamPlanner: Matt Gennett The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department Published April 5, 2OO4,in the Vail Dai[. Attachmenh F Adjacent Property Owners List Appeal of DRB04-0016 Glen Lyon Subdivision Lot 17: PURCHASE, JOHN LAYTON & LARA JTINE -JT 754 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL, CO 81657 Lot24: CUNNINGHAM, BARRY E. 271 ANEMONE DR BOULDER, CO 80302 Lot24'. HARLAN, HAL P., HUGH P., & DOUG H. PO BOX 29176 INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46229 Lot 16: GERSTENBERGER, ALLEN & JANET 5255 BOW MAR DR LITTLETON, CO 80123 Lot l6: HORN, JEFFREY M. & SALLY HELMS -JT 18 AVON RD BRONXVILLE, NY 10708 Lot23: HOVEY, NANCY M. l WOODHOLMLN MANCHESTER, MA 0I944-1057 Lot25 LOHRE, JOHN O. & MARY B. 333 LOGAN ST STE 203 DENVER, CO 80203 Lot26: LAZIER, ROBERTBUDDY 386 HANSON RD VAIL, CO 81657 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Vail Town Council Department of Community Development Apnl20,2O04 An Appeal of the March 3,2004 Design Review Board (DRB) approval with conditions of a proposal to build a new single family residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourVLot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, by the owner of lot 24B, Glen Lyon, Mr. Barry Cunningham. Appellant BarryCunningham, representedbyArtAbplanalpPlanner: Matt Gennett il. il1. SUBJECT PROPERW The subject property is part of Special Development District No. 4 with the underlying zone district being Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS), the standards of which prevail in this case, and is located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision. The appellant owns one-half of a duplex lot and structure located at 1319 Greenhill CourULot 24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision (Attachment H, Vicinity Map). STANDING OF APPELLANT The appellant, Barry Cunningham, has standing to file an appeal as the property owner of Lot24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision. BACKGROUND In 1978, the Glen Lyon Subdivision was platted, thereby creating lots 17 and 24. In 1996, Mr. Cunningham received a building permit to construct a duplex on Lot 24, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Subsequent to the original construction, the duplex structure has since been maxed out on the allowable GRFA. In March of 2004, Mr. Purchase received Design Review Board (DRB) approval with conditions to construct a single-fami[ home on lot 17, with the following (one) condition of approval: That the applicant revises the design review board plans to depict the relocation of the house I - 9 feet further back (south) on the lot, prior to application for a building permit. The DRB created and imposed this condition of approval to reach a compromise and take the concems of the appellant into consideration with the conditional approval granted to Mr. Purchase, and ensure compliance with the Design Guidelines. REQUIRED ACTION The Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Design Review Board's approval tv. V. with conditions of Mr. Purchase's design review application to construct a new single-family residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Pursuant to Sub-section 1 2-3-3-C.5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code: The Town Council shall on all appeals make speciftc findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12) have or have not been met. NATURE OF THE APPEAL The appellant, Mr. Barry Cunningham, represented by Art Abplanalp, of Abplanalp Law Office, PC, is appealing the Design Review Board's decision to unanimously approve with conditions the proposed Purchase Residence. The appellant has provided written justification for the appeal. A copy of the appellant's letter (Attachment D) is attached for reference. Staff began working with the appellant during the last week of February, 2004 approximately one week and a half prior to the March 3,2004, DRB meeting to help him understand the plans for the proposed Purchase Residence. The following are the appellant's stated issues of concem, verbatim, and staffs response to each of the allegations written below each issue: lssue 7.' Survey Section 1 2-1 1-4: Mateial to be Submitted; Procedure; subsection C, 1 , requires a suruey to be submitted. The survey is required to show existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of four inches or more at one foot above natural grade. The suruey submifted by the applicant only includes "coniferous" trees (i.e., Evergreens). There are numerous large Aspen trees on the propefty with diameters exceeding 4". The Town Code makes no exclusion for Aspen trees. Therefore the applicant did not provide the required submiftal materials and the Design Review Board should therefore not have taken action on the proposal until suchrequiredinformationwasprovided. Thisinsufficiencywasbroughttothe aftention of staff and the Design Review Board (DRB) prior to the approval of the project on March 3, 2004 by Mr. Cunningham to no avail. Withoutthe identification of the Aspens, it is impossible to evaluate the proposed impacts, or after construction, the actual impact of the development activity on this important neighborhood asseL (Attachment G) Staffs Response: The survey submitted with Mr. Purchase's application is dated June 25, 2001 , is stamped and signed by a licensed Surveyor, and meets the requirements of section 12-114,Yail Town Code (Attachment G). Staff performed a site visit to the subject property in early February, 2004, shortly after the application was submitted, and did not notice any discrepancies between whatwas shown on the survey and the existing vegetation visible on the site. Further inspection revealed that 6-8 aspen trees are located in and around the building envelope which do not appear on the survey. Staff did make the concerns of the appellant clear to the DRB at the pre-meeting for the final review on March 3, 2004, and made a point to indicate, during the scheduled site visit, the trees not illustrated on the survey. The DRB acknowledged the aspen trees at issue, and tookthem into consideration with the condition of approval imposed on the applicant. The DRB also listened to the testimony of the appellant during the public hearing and made their decision afteruard. Issue2: Irees There is a cluster of large Aspens /ocated along the lower portion (west side) of the subject property that were not depicted on the tree suNey. Had those trees been properly depicted we believe the DRB would have considered these valuable trees that form a natural buffer between Mr. Cunningham's home and the proposed home. Secfion 10 of the Development Standards Handbook states fhat the location of structures should be such that it limits the removal of trees and is responsive to the topography. Additionally, the intent of the landscape plan is to "preserue and enhance the natural landscape character of the area in which it is located." This section a/so sfafes 'the Design Review Board may designate allowable limits of construction activity and require physical baniers in order to preserve significant natural features and vegetation upon a site." The DRB placed a condition on the approval of this project requiring the applicant to move the proposed home an additional 8' - 9' away from the west propefty line. This number was anived at arbitraily and instead should have been based upon the location of mature trees. Had the DRB based the condition upon the natural vegetation located on the site it should have required the home be setback an additional 15' based on the location of mature vegetation instead of 8' -9'. Seffihg the home back a total of 30' from the west lot line would not have resulted in significant impacts lo the design of the home, retaining walls, or diveway grade. Therefore, the DRB erred when approving the project due to the lack of consideration of the impacts to mature trees on the propefty that form a natural buffer to adjacent properties. Staffs Response: The appellant is correct in his assertion that there are approximately 6-8 live aspen trees of a 4" caliper or greater which are not depicted on the survey that are within the proposed building envelope. As stated in the response to lssue 1, staff did point outthe aspen trees in question to the DRB during the scheduled site visit and there was some discussion over whether those trees were more aesthetically valuable than any of the numerous other mature trees on Lot 17. The subject site covers over half an acre of land (23,731 square feet) and contains a substantial number of mature trees throughout the property. There are many more larger trees on the subject property that are being preserved under the current approval with conditions than if the proposed structure was to be located further up the hillside. Under Mr. Purchase's current proposal, pursuant to the DRB's condition of approval, 37 mature trees are being removed. lf Mr. Purchase were to move the house an additional ten feet up the hillside, to the northwest, approximately the same number of trees would have to be removed. lssue 3.' Driveway Layout Section 10 of the Development Standards Handbook sfates fhaf access ways shall be responsive to the existing topography of a site. The proposed plan includes an open-air covered parking area forfourcars and an expansive diveway and auto-court, vvhich creates the need for retaining walls and impacts large stands of mature trees. The width of the diveway is inconsistent with the design guidelines, which require that impacts to topography and trees should be minimized. A review of other driveways along Greenhill Couft reveals that this is only home that contains an expansive auto-court and an open-air covered parking area. Therefore, the proposed diveway, auto-court, and covered parking area are out of character for the neighborhood. An adequate driveway can be designed to reduce impacts to both topography and trees. The DRB erred when approving this project due to the impacts of the diveway to trees, the impacts to natural topography, and the necessrty for tall retaining walls almost on the lot line to retain the auto-court. Staffs Response: Upon review by staff and the DRB, the proposed location of the Purchase Residence seemed to present the least amount of negative impacts, visual and otherwise, to the whole of Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision. lf the applicant chose to locate his new residence further up the hillside, the required road cut would create a negative visual impact, in the form of a scar on the landscape, visible from a substantial distance away. Likewise, a longer driveway would necessitate the removal of a large number of mature trees on the site and a considerable amount of natural landscape to be disturlced. Therefore, locating the residence in as close proximity to Greenhill Court as possible without encroaching into the setbacks minimizes the impacts on existing topography and trees. lssue 4: Driveway Functionality The owner has designed a home that is elevated on piers and contains a garage buried deep beneath the home. Access to the garage and designated parking spaces make it nearly impossible for a car to back down the driveway or tumaround on sife and exit the diveway. The Development Standards Handbook requires that diveways be designed as to allow free and unobstrucfed access to and from the site. The plan approved by the DRB doeS not allow for adequate vehicular maneuverability. Ihe access fo the site can be greatly improved by rotating the home clock-wise (to the east) to line-up more closely with existing grades. This rotation would also allow more trees to be preserved on the west side of the lot, improve access to the garage, and reduce impacts to topography and the need for extensive retaining walls. The DRB ened in its approval of the plans as it did not adequately ev al u ate th e g arag e/pa rki ng accessib il ity. Staffs Response: The DRB reviewed Mr. Purchase's proposal conceptually oh February 18,2004, and again for a final approval on March 3,2004. During the course of those meetings, the DRB asked the applicant about the driveway and the maneuverability related to accessing the garage and were satisfied with the response of the applicant. Also, staff refened both the original and updated plans to the Town of Vail Public Works Department and did not receive comments or concerns related to turning radii or maneuverability. When one carefully scrutinizes the site plan and lower level floor plan (Attachments A & B), it can be discemed that there is indeed enough room to maneuver vehicles in and out of the garage, parking area, and driveway. Staff has no reason to question the desirability of the design to the applicant as it does allow adequate, unobstructed access to and from the site. lssue 5.' GRFNBUIk and Mass Gross Resrde ntial Floor Area (GRFA) and the Town's Design Guidelines were developed by the Town to help control bulk and mass of structures along with other tools sucfi as limitations on site coverage, landscape area, and building height. The first element noticed when reviewing the applicant's plans was the extensive area being created underthe home. ln addition to an enclosed two-cargarage buried underthe building, there is approximately another 2,000 sq. ft. of open area and areas labeled crawlspace. The other issue noticed was the additional diveway that approaches the home on the west side. The bulk and mass of the home had been purposely raised an entire story in order to convert the lower4evd of the home to livable area either illegally or subsequent to the Town's approval of changes to the GRFA regulations being championed by the applicant's architect, Steven Riden. lf one reviewsthe plans closely, it becomes apparentthatthe applicant intendsto movethe garage to the front of the home in the future and access that garage from the driveway entering the building from the west Ihls would seem to be the most logical place to locate the garage rather than driving below an elevated building to an enclosed garage space in the rear. 4 Once the garage is relocated, it then becomes vety easy to conveft the remaining 2,000 sq. ft. "void space" to livable area. The DRB and/or the Town staff ened when approving lhese p/ans as the plans violate the purpose and intent of Title 12, Chapter 1 5, Secflons 1 2-1 5-1 and 1 2-1 5-3. Section 1 2-1 F3, 1, d. sfales that the following can be excluded from GRFA: "roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or similarfeatures with no more than three (3) exteriorwalls and a minimum opening of nof /ess than twenty-five percent (25%) of the lineal peimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space -.." The lower level of this building is more characteristic of a basement then it is a deck, porch, tenace, or patio. This area should have been considered GRFA and, once considered as GRFA, the proposed structure is approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in excess of the allowable GRFA for this lot. Staffs Response: Section 12-15-3.1 .d reads as follows: Roofed or covered deck, porches, tenaces, patios or similarfeatures or spaces with no more than three (3) exteior walls and a minimum opening of nof /ess than twenty five percent (25To) of the lineal perimeterof the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, orsimilarfeature or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully open from floor to ceiling with an allowance for a railing of up to fofi four inches (44") in height. The covered area in question is a contiguous space that is fully open from floor to ceiling, and is open on the perimeterto an extent greaterlhan25o/o, as can be discerned from the attached site plan, lower level floor plan, and elevations (Attachments A & B). The concerns of the appellant related to the potential future conversion of the spaces at issue are understandable but not grounded in fact. Neither staff, nor the DRB, can make claims based on the possible intentions of an applicant or what may or may not occur in the future. The crawlspaces in question meet the standards for a crawlspace in that they are drawn, dimensioned, and labeled as meeting the standards for such spaces. lssue 6.' Excessiye Slopes Secfion 1 2-21-1 4, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excesslve S/opes, Title 12, Chapter 21 , of the Town Code requires that when a house and diveway are proposed with average grades rn excess of 30%, a sorTs and foundation investigation be submifted with a DRB application. This lot has grades rn excess of 30% yet no soils and foundation report were provided to the Town prior to March 3, 2004. Therefore, Town staff and/orthe DRB erred in its approval of the project as no such repoft was provided by the applicant. Staffs Response: The subject property does have average slopes in excess of 30o/o and the applicant has provided a site specific geologic investigation stamped by a certified professional geobgrt*. The requirements sited by the appellant are correct, but these requirements must be met prior to the submission of a building permit to the Community Development Department. Additionally, staff has not ascertained that the applicant has met the DRB's condition of approval, and the final set of plans that is approved must be stamped by a licensed architect on every sheet. Also, at the time of building permit submittal, the applicant will provide the soils and foundation investigation, along with the foundation plans, all stamped by a licensed Professional Engineer. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN CODE Section 12-3-3: APPEALS : vt. C. Appeal Of Planning And Environmental Commission Decisions And Design Review Board Decisions: 1. Authority: The town council shall have the authorig to hear and decide appeals from any decision, determination or interpretation by the planning and environmental commission or the design review board with respect to the provisions of this title and the standards and procedures hereinafter set forth. 2. Initiation: An appeal may be initiated by an applicant, adjacent property owner, or any aggrieved or adversely affected person from any order, decision, determination or interpretation by the planning and environmental commission or the design review board with respect to this title. 'Aggrieved or adversely affected person" means any person who will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or furthered by this title. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with other members of the community at large, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons. The administrator shall determine the standing of an appellant. lf the appellant objects to the administrator's determination of standing, the town council shall, at a meeting prior to hearing evidence on the appeal, make a determination as to the standing of the appellant. lf the town council determines that the appellant does not have standing to bring an appeal, the appeal shall not be heard and the original action or determination stands. The town council may also call up a decision of the planning and environmental commission or the design review board by a majority vote of those council members present. 3. Procedures: A written notice of appeal must be filed with the administrator within twenty (20) calendar days of the planning and environmental commission's decision or the design review board's decision becoming final. lf the last day for filing an appeal falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a town observed holiday, the last day for filing an appeal shall be extended to the next business day. Such notice shall be accompanied by the name and addresses (person's mailing and property's physical) of the appellant, applicant, property owner, and adjacent property owners (the list of property owners within a condominium project shall be satisfied by listing the addresses for the managing agent or the board of directors of the condominium association) as well as specific and articulate reasons for the appeal on forms provided by the town. The flling of such notice of appeal requires the planning and environmental commission or the design review board to forward to the town council at the next regularly scheduled meeting a summary of all records concerning the subject matter of the appeal and to send written notice to the appellant, applicant, property owner, and adjacent property owners (notification within a condominium project shall be satisfied by notifying the managing agent or the board of directors of the condominium association) at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the hearing. A hearing shall be scheduled to be heard before the town council on the appeal within forty (40) calendar days of the appeal being filed. The town council may grant a continuance to allow the parties additional time to obtain information. The continuance shall be allowed for a period not to exceed an additional thirty (30) calendar days. Failure interpretation or determination made by the planning and environmental commission or the design review board. 4. Effect Of Filing An Appeal: The filing of a notice of appeal shall stay all permit activity and any proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed unless the administrative official rendering such decision, determination or interpretation certifies in writing to the town council and the appellant that a stay poses an imminent peril to life or property, in which case the appeal shall not stay further permit activity and any proceedings. The town council shall review such certification and grant or deny a stay of the proceedings. vn. Such determination shall be made at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the town council. 5. Findings: The town council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title have or have not been met. 6. Fee: The town council may set a reasonable fee for filing an appeal to a planning and environmental commission or design review board decision. The fee will be adopted in a fee schedule which shall be maintained in the department of community development. The fee shall be paid at the time the appeal is filed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council upholds the Design Review Board's approval with conditions of the design review application for the Purchase residence, located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, in accordance with Sub-section 12-3-3C.5, VailTown Code, and the following finding: 'That the Design Review Board (DRB) diligently followed the appropriate regulations and procedures for a design review application in the case of the proposed Purchase Residence and their findings of fact support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, have been met as presented in each of staffs responses to the appellant's stated issues, as listed in Section V, pages 2-5 of this memorandum.' ATTACHMENTS A. Reduced Site Plan of Mr. Purchase's proposed residence (revised per condition) B. Reduced Architectural Floor Plan of the lower level & elevations C. Appellant's appealform D. Letter from the Appellant E. Public Notice F. List of Notified Properties G. Reduced Survey H. Vicinity Mapl. Mr. Purchase's response to Appellant's stated issues (includes arloorist's report) .l I, T BnucuA. Cou.rxs, pH.D. N^nnlr RBorIG Cri6llT^nrr P.O. Box23 . 1 1 16 MtMorA DRrvE SrLr, CoroRADo 81652 PHoNdF^x (970) 87Gs400 bacol@rof.net John L. Purchase 753 E. Potato patch Dr. Vail, CO 81657 ENUR0NMENTAL ExPr.oR noN. AND MINNG GEoLocY March 25,2fiX *' #L:Hi:Hrrr courr, trn rz, cr.EN LyoN Dear Mr. Purchase: I have completed my geologic investigation of the above referenced property, located on thelower slopes of vail Mountain east ol west Vail, Eagle county cotoraao. This investigationconsisted of a phpical examination of the site conducied in Auglrst,2(x)3, reviewgrf applicablereference materials, and incorporation of the site developmen't ptan provideflfte extremewestern edge of the sire is included in the moderate debrii flow irazardzo;6; T;#;;]geologrc hazard maps, arthough based on both aeriar photographs and r*";;;;;il;\;;U's' Geo-logical survey (Scott' et al.,2oo2J it appears ajttroujtr tire aebris flow hazard bounilaryessentially corresponds to the west boundary of the properi. Topographically the building site is located on the lower slopes of vail Mountain below andnorthwest of Eagles Nest, at an average elerration of 8,t20 feet, with existing dwellingsimmediatelywest tr-up! northeast. A mapped intermittentstream has formed an allwial fanwith its apex at 8'200 ft immediately south-southwest of tot 17. According to airphotos thecurrent drainage over the fan has been channeled well west ofthe site. B*t9"k beleath approximately the eastern two-thirds of l.ot 17 is Minturn Formation (pm),which consists ofmostlygrayto reddish arkosic conglomerate and sandstone, with interlayeredsiltstone and mudstone as well as occasional limestone and dolomite, in beds that dipnortheasterly at 9"just soltheast ofthe property. Surficial deposits which are mapped by Scott,et al', as overlying the Minurn on the *ruri"*ihita, including most if not all of tlre buildingenvelope, consist ofunit Qfy, younger fan allwium and debris-fliw deposits (Holocene and latestPaleocene). These materials are deicribed as '. . . poorly sorted, bouliery to cobbly sand and silt I Fr,tchas" Re"idence site Dercropment pran Sheet sDr, steven James R.iden, March t5.2004. 2 stott, RB.' Udke DJ., and Grumrald, DJ., 2002, Geologic map of the vail west quadrangle, Eagle county,Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous fieid Studies Map MF_2369, lg p. PAGE 2 that includes minor lenses of sandy to cobbly gravel and debris-flow deposits'' Most boulders are less than 3 feet in diameter bui in some in debrisflow deposits are as large as 6 feet' The moderate debris flow zone boundary is dravrn along a low but distinct ridge at the extreme east edge of the mapped allwiat fan. this ridge will keep any debris flow-material running over the fan-to the west of the property, in the cul-desac of and on Greenhill Court itself; as noted prerriously the current primarychannel of the drainage is well to the west' There is no erridence ofrecent flow on the eastem edge ofthe fan, where undisturbed vegetation appears to be in the 2* to7*year age range; existi-ng stfuctures in the area vary up to at least 30 years in age' tlitigatjon of ruih d"bri, flort haiard as may exist can be accomplished by (a) lewing the ridgg menioned above in place or by incorporating equivalent structures in final drainage design (such ,a*.tur", can range from siriple restoratio-n ojf di.t ttb"n"es to construction of berms or rock walls, orto construction of foundations sufficienttowittstand and direct potential debris flow); anO 1Q prerrenting redirection of existing drainage on the eastern part ofthe cul-de-sac by construction of a driveway either at the eiisting grade of the road or on a sliglrt upgrade into the lot for that portion that may lie within the mipped hazard. Final grading and landscaping should be desiened and constructed in such a mannet as to conveywater, including snowmelt, awry from struchtres, and all new or modified drainage must be coordinated with existing drainage frcilities. Alluvial fan deposits such as those that appear to underlie the western third ofthe site can be subject to hydto.ott paction, and may conAin voids due to differential compaction around boulders, piping, or both. Considering source rocks forthe debris found in the area oflr,t17' trydrocompiction is less likely than differential compaction and piping, but in any case soil testing and excarration examination should be sufficient to identiry and mitigate such hazards "t *{ be present within foundation design limits. Boulders loosened during excavation for foundationi and utilities should be stabilized or removed and the resulting voids filled with compacted material before bacldtling. These materials are generally not conducive to corrosion o,lrydro"*p"nsion, although routine soil tests can easity establish the absence ofthese hazards, and are not known to .ont"in significant radioactive minerals in the region, but nevertheless all inhabited spaces should be designed and constructed to prevent the accumulation ofradon or other noxious or toxic gases. To summarize, the site has been mapped at the edge of a moderate debris flow hazard zone, and in fact the west boundary of the property may be equivalent to the east boundary of the zone- Available aerial photography and geotogic maps suggest that the western third of the property is underlain byti e "."i"* eage of the allwial fan associatedwidrthe drainage that presenq 9" debris flow hazard. Such harardt ". may exist can be mitigated by maintaining the existing ridge that forms the east edge of the fan, or replacing itwith equivalent stnrctures; final grading and landscaping designed to conduct site drainage away from structures and into existing drainage systems; ana soii testing adequate to detect voids resulting from differential compaction or prping. The debris flow hazard to which the site is exposed is minimal, and excavation, iolnaiton, grading, and landscaping design and constnrction techniques for such locations are well-established. With the mitigiting measured recommended the proposed construction will P^GE 3 not increase the hazard to other property or strucrtures, or to public righa-ofrway, buildings, roads, streets, easements, utilities, or facilities or other properties of any kind. This report is intendedto complywithappropriate portions ofTown ofVail Regulations Chapter 12-21-15, and nothing contained herein should be interpreted as suggesting that the subject property is not exposed to the mapped hazard, or that other geologic hazards do not exist. tfyou have any questions, or if I can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact me. Itr,iPoRTAtrNor'rce This report concerns natural processe that are rmpredictable and ln large measure poorly rmderstood. ft is intended to identift potenthl obsenable hazards within ttrc scope ofwork to which dre subje'ct property is exposed and to swgest mitigatiDg mea$rcs in compliance with applicable regulations. l,lothing in this report should be construed or interyrcted as $Egesthg tlrc abeerce of the described hazards, or that tte recornmended mitigations wil pmtect fte sarhiect proDcty from dE describ€d h,uads rnder all cirsmstances, forcseen or uforeseen. ltothing ilr thb rtport $ould be co{rsE|nd ot int€tprcted as $rygEsting tlutadditinal uoilentified hazards ere not pr€senc ft must aho be undestood thet 'mitigation" does nG arean eitlrer the elimination of tlre hazard(s) or prerrmtion of tfie consequences ofa hazard errent or evEnts, only the r€dudion to drc €xtent reasonably pmible of the latter. By accepting thb report all present and s[bseqrnrt pafties thereto agl€e to indemni& and hold harmless the preparer for any and all damage, dirccg indhect or consequcrtial, indding personal injury or lc of life, aboe and belond the original cct of thb strdy, caused by or reulting trom any occunene oftlrc described or other hezld(s[ wftedrer or notsuch damrges may result from faltrre to identi&satd haeard(s) or ftom failrne on indequacy of pmp€rly engineerd, aonshrcted, and meintained reonrmorded mitigatiorc. The prtparer of this report cannot and will not be responsible in any wEr or manner whatsoever for the proper engineerftrg, cors,,E:ucti<rn, andtor rmintenance of recomrnended mitfations, or the inadequacyor failure o'f improperlyengineercd, colrstnrcted, andlo' maintained recommended mitigations, or mitigations that have been altered in anyraywlntsoorcr ftom thoee recommmded by the preparcr. This report may be amended or withdrawn wittrout notice at any time prior to receipt of payment ther€for. ZONE CHECK Datc: Ad drcss Osncr Architcrt Lot sirc Sitc Covcragc Hcigbt Sctbacks ,ffi{&rnainils, _5!t c<2 '. r-ur 5las _ra rt , > Y I 'lsi@*l6,xas- j>to 'q,1*oy*x!o z i'qii ). roralG*A lfr.ggfkd . Proposcd Total.i,Ta!=Tztt Prinrary CRFA _ l q+ZS1 1eZS"1=--.-+ Scrondary GRFA _ + (.125) (675+) =.- - + _ ; * 675=425 crcdirplus250addition Docs rlris rcqucst involvc a250 Addtton? lLb, - Horv much of thc allorvcd 250 Addition is uscd Mth Ns rcqucst?o Existingr cofi:l Fron t Sidcs Rcar 7)' a , ,/r'r, O'Minimum (flzo lo0o( -" ft% l't 6' : n.quircA !b b v"s-Jl No_-- Ycsj- No-- 7fz 6' 3 /32 Encloscd (300) (600)@ (l2oo) \l PcrmittcdSlopc 'Q % proposcd Stopc I y, l) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >30%) 2) Floodptain 3) \v 4) Watcr Coursc Scrback (30) ( 5) Gcologic Hazards a) Snorv Avalanchc b) Roclfatl _ /- i ,j o.urir ot gk_ Pro'ious conditions of rpprovdl (cbcck propcrty filc); Is thc propcrty non-conformingi Dacribc: O o -t . t:.,..-( ,t1]r::i';1 ,nrp"u toro.rt-t 7-1 . sJptr18u1urz;r1 u- (,p)sfueq.rcagp "*, * .-'i..f alucao3*,t_rt qrEs,*-ya n*rolrn-*.s,7 lqsragsurnppt- ?- Uuoqeogua,rAttqn Vnt(gTV)uodcrcnrr t''./ p,rorddyopuo3 V.7/ ,:'j:.j.:#.i "/NVtdgJI? .suopcaclclodg T / ,uor.rolltt{ -T- ,_/ ::*l s tps?Jr?pH la ururubrraug /;- ,/' :I.eqlrs csmoJ ," r,*.27y ueldpoog.:,(961 :Ife uvr Y/A/ fqdafodog F/nutwsa,/7y_ **r,o*tad--- 1ilx. coedg cqlqlarut ,n:. vfrre puoppp"os{ $ry , JJ.rt f '*/; ,Kuooory, JSITXJSHJ ATsIAftI NOISSC 'lilcphotrt: 970,47ti.1):10() 970.476.ii50() 1i'lecopirr: lt t'11.47h.47tt\ l.)mail: planalpGt'vaii.net Larv Office of Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr. L.L.C. Post Office Box 2800 Vail, Colorado 81658-2800 28 April2004 Phvsical Address: Suite 30I !'ail 21 Building 4?2 East Lionshead Circle \,hil, Colorado 81657 Mr. George Ruther Mr. Matt Gennett Town of Vail Department of Community Development 111 South Frontage Road West Vail CO 81657 Re: Purchase Residence Application,Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision Dear George and Matt: As you are aware, our Firm represents Mr. Barry Cunningham, the owner of Lot 24, Glen Lyon Subdivision. During the Town Council meeting last Tuesday night, it was our understanding that Matt indicated that the Town had received a revised landscape plan, based upon the relocation of the Purchase residence following the conditional approval granted by the Design Review Board, and that you were in the process of reviewing that proposal. Since that time, I have been told that no landscaping plan had been submitted, but that one was anticipated. Whichever the case, whether a revised landscape plan was or was not submitted prior to the Council meeting, please advise me (a) whether, at the time of your receipt of this letter, a revised landscape plan has been submitted, and, if not, whether it has been or is being required, (b) of the timing of an opporrrrnity to review that plan and (c) of the Town's action on the proposal. Additionallg we now understand that a new calculation has been made relating to the GFRA permitted on the Purchase property. If that is, in fact, the case, we would appreciate learning of that calculation, including the manner in which it was made and the total GRIA which the Town has now determined is permitted on the Purchase lot. Thankyou, once again, again for Mr. Barry Cunningham Mr. Matt Mire xc: Te lep h ttne: 970.476.0300 970.476.6500 Te Ie cop ie r: 970.476.4765 llmail: planalp@lvail.net Law Office of Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr. L,L.C. Post Office Box 2800 Vail, Colorado 81658-2800 19 May 2004 Physical Address: Suite ll01 !'ail 2l Building 472 East Lionshead Circle lhil, Colorado 81657 Mr. Matt Gennett Town of Vail Department of Community Development 111 South Frontage Road West Vail CO 81657 Re: Purchase Residence Application, Lot L7, Glen Lyon Subdivision Dear Matt: As you are aware, this Office represents Mr. Barry Cunningham, the owner of Lot24, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Confirming our recent conversations, you will find under cover of this letter fully executed counterparts of the Settlement Agreement by which Mr. Cunningham, Mr. and Mrs. Purchase, and the Town of Vail have resolved the issues related to the Purchase project in Glen Lyon. Based upon the terms of this Settlement Agreement, Mr. Cunningham has authorized me to advise you that he withdraws his appeal of the decisions related to the Purchase project, and that the hearing scheduled for the 24th of. May, 2004, can be cancelled. Thank you, once again, again for your assistance and for your efforts. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me. Enclosuresxc: Mr. Barry Cunningham SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement (the "settlement Agreement") is made tne l( day of May, 2OO4,by and between John Lapon Purchase and Laura June Purchase, (collectively, "Purchase"), Barry Cunningham ("Cunningham") and the Town of Vail, Colorado (the "Town"): RECITALS Whereas, Purchase desires to construct improvements on certain real properry owned by them and described as Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, Town of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado (the "Purchase Project"); Whereas, Cunningham is the owner of Lot 24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision, Town of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, which is properry which will be affected by the Purchase Project, and has filed an appeal with the Town of Vail related to certain aspects of the Purchase Project; and Whereas, the Town is responsible for the administration of the land use regulations of the Town of Vail and has authority, through its staff approval process, to consent to and approve the clarifications and comrnitrnents contained in this Settlement Agreement: TERMS AND CONDITIONS Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom, the parties agree as follows: 1. Modifications of Purchase Project. Purchase shall take the following actions in association with the development of the Purchase Project. Ten (10) spruce trees each having a height of eight (8) feet or greater and four (4) aspen trees each having a caliper of two (2) to three (3) inches (measured in conformity Town standards) shall be installed, at the expense of Purchase, at the location specified by Cunningham within the area identified as "Forestation Area" on the plat attached as Exhibit A, which action shall occur before the application by Purchase for a temporary or permanent Ceftificate of Occupancy forthe residence which is to be constructed as part of the Purchase Project. Cunningham shall be notified of the point in time when his identification of the planting 1. 2. 3. locations is required. The three (3) spruce trees identified on Exhibit A as "Originally Planned Spruce" shall be installed aPart from the ten spruce trees referred to'in this sub-section. This allocation of trees within the Forestation Area shall result in an adjustment in the total number of trees required for the entire Purchase Project by which there shall be required a total of thirry (30) spruce trees having a height of eight feet or greater (a change from twenty (20) such trees) and a total of thirty (30) aspen trees having a caliper of two (2) to three (3) inches (a change from forry (40) such trees). b. There shall be constructed at the location identified as a "New Partial WaIl" on Exhibits A and B a wall on the north boundary of the parking area identified on Exhibit A, which wall shall be not more than 44 inches nor less than 40 inches high and constructed of rock material identical to other rockwalls on the Purchase residence which is to be constructed as part of the Purchase Project. c. The exterior material of the retaining walls identified as "Rock-Faced Retaining Walls" on Exhibit A shall be constructed of rock material identical to other rock walls on the Purchase residence which is to be constructed as part of the Purchase Project. d. Purchase shall take all action necessary or appropriate with the Town of Vail Department of Community Development in order to effect the terms of this Settlement Agreement. 2. Withdrawal of Cunningham Appeal. In association with this Settlement Agreement, and upon the approval of this Settlement Agreement by all parties and the Town of Vail, Cunningham shall withdraw his appeal currently pending before the Town of Vail associated with the Purchase Project. 3. Time. Time is the essence of this Agreement. 4. The Parties acknowled.ge and agree that they have been represented and advised by independent legal counsel of their own choosing throughout all negotiations which preceded the execution of this Agreement, and in connection with their execution of this Agteement. 5. Counterpans: Telecopier Transmittal. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts. When a counterpart is signed by each party, this Agreement shall be fully binding upon all parties. Copies of this Agreement, whether produced by telecopier or otherwise, shall be ofequal evidence as originals. 6. Governing Law. Jurisdiction. Venue. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and each of the parties hereto hereby agree that proper venue for any action between the parties shall be in the District Court of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. 7 . Notice. Any notice required or desired to be given by any Party to any other parry shatl be given to all parties by telecopier and by mailing the same to such parfy to the telecopier number and to the address noted below, and notice so iransmiaed by telecopier and so mailed shall for all purposes hereof be as effectual as though served upon such party in person at the time of depositing such notice in the mail. If to Purchase:7{+ 6,ft1r* ?,"u*tt ' \/a/J. co 8lG (a Via Telecopier to:ot+ q If to Cunningham: Barry Cunningham 271 Anemone Drive Boulder CO 80302 Via Telecopier to: 303./+40.9509 If to the Town: Town of Vail Department of Community Development 11.1, South Frontage Road West Vail CO 81.657 Via Telecopier to: or at such other address as the parry shall specify by notice in writing to the other. 9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior written oral or implied understandings among them on that subject matter and the parties acknowledge and agree that there are no representations and warranties with respect to the transaction contemplated hereby other than as expressly set fofth herein. 10. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only in writing executed on behalf of all pardes hereto. 11. Binding Effect and Benefits. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit ofthe parties and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns, provided that nothing heiein is intended to confer on any Person other than the parties hereto or, their respective successors and assigns, any rights or obligations. 12. Section and Other Headings. The sections and other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not effect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 13. No Assignment. No party hereto shall assigp in whole or, in part, this Agreement or its respective right and obligations, without the expressed prior written consent of the other party. 74. Waiver. Remedies. No waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any or subsequent breach and the failure of a parry to enforce at any time any provisions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of any right of any such party to subsequently enforce such provision or any other provision hereof. 15. Severabiliqv. IntheeventErnyprovision oranyportion ofthisAgteement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable under applicable law the remainder of this Agreement shall remain valid and enforceable, if the purpose and intent of the parties can be preserved in the absence of such provision. 16. Authority to Execute Agreement. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto represent that they have full and lawful authority to do so. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands as of the first day above Barry Cunningham Town of Vail:#v' Lara June pu"cn.s" - John Lavton Purchase Tirle: ooll O(r.rl ra56 a? trd ootl f rll99oo a\ a\trd ootlr-I|orD\aa \,t f)o \Fro \ Jr|o 6lrlE F .{c ..n ( o I Irt 6 3oF o\ -o rO 6 3I oo oiE\Too 6..5FEI b-' \-is 6 I gttt-tr E ootl-ot\t g)65 66FO "ed.o I-o $a t'lo 1', t/J/-t< -o Io 6F ,"o; o Ic rO6 ? F oI s rO il ^..4 ,,tq 6C7?(r-Clfi U F U v_ li-:? /99oo 56FOCicf ru6rrrF ,*r. lN\;*"\.')X)^)c NS,:>e';)i--Jr' < -+'4rr.\ \ -r\ \\ ,-V. rY. t \\ '*t'\'r\ '\ Y trN$ $\\ \Y'-'t) s A (t CCn FROI4 : l{'Irv-200{ ll r17 o r^t oFF FAX NO. "91A2235ALA ICE PH0llE t70-178'0100 0701r!17!l O"r. L4 26a4 a1:1sPM P1 T.0?7 P.009/000 F-0E7 lrqr-AIPLNALP . SETIISMEIVTAGREEIIMNT ltls Agreeuert (tltc "settlemert AgneeDGBt') ts made the lLtil dfiJ of l{ay, 2A04'W and benrcq JohB layor Purclrese and lrura June Pruclure (co[ecdy€ly, '{Purdraset, Barry Ctnnlagbam ("Cunntn8han") and thc Town of vat[ Golorado (the 'efotu["): NECITAIS l. VllXcfcta, Purthase derires to coratnrct lmprovements on certaln real prqPcfty ottaGd byttreo and descrlbed as Lot l7,GIm Llon SubdMrtono Town of vall, Corrnty of Eagle, State of Colorado (the "Purdlase Project"); 2, Vllhereas, Cuntrtngham ls tlre owner of lpt 248, Glen Lyon $ubdivlshn, Towrr ofVail, Counvof Eagle, State of Colorado, whteh is prupertywhlch will be affectad bythe Purchase Prqfect, md has ffled an appeal wlrlr the Tovm of Vrll related to certaln aspec$ of tLe Purchase hoJecq and 3. lllhetrar, the Toum is recponslble for the adEiniotration of the hnd use reguladoas of the Town of Vatl and har authorlty, tbrough lte staff approval prECetS, to conseBt to aadiapprove the clariffcadons aud cc6blhe$ts connlned |n this Settlerneqt Agreeuent: TBRMS AND CONDTIIONS Now, ttrcrcfore, to conefieradou of the ruutual benefle to be dedrnd herefron, the pardec Bgrtee as follorre: 1. Modlficattqff gf ltrqhase Proiect. Purcbgse Bhall tal@ the fullowfng actlonn lu asrodadon wlth tbe derdopment of the purc:hase pmJect. a. Ten (10) gPilce treeg each havlng a helght of eight (8) feet or gnat&r and four (4) acpen treed .a'h baving a calipcr dr arvo (a) to three (s) lnchec (measured ll conbrmity town erandards) shall ue tnstanc,-ai tlr. .rpuryu of Purchare, at the locatioa rpecified by cunntnslutn wftfutn thp areaidentlf,ed re cForcetadonArea" onrhe ptitattactJO as ExhlffiA, uthich ecdon elrrll occur beforc the app[earlon by purchare for ateilPoraly or perruanmt Cerdff cetc of Ocflpancy for tte tnsldence whlchir to be conetructed 8s pan ofthe purchari nroJect. Cqnnrnghanr ehall be notlied of the ltnr tn time wheu hts ideatlficadon ordie prand$g 1 N L,L' Q). FROI : tt{ry-2001 1l r{7 O"r. 1.4 2aa4 a1 :lsPM Pz trq.AlPllllllP T-U17 P.00f/000 F'9W locadonr te reEdrcd. the tlree (3) spruce bees ideffified on E*hlbh e ar "Orlglnnlly Planned Spnrce' ehall be lnstaUcd apart ftoo th€ teu spruce tt?€o tcfctled to in thts sub'secdoa. Thts allocadon of treee withln the Forectadon Area rhall reault ln an adfualment la the rotal aunbcr of trees requircd for the eadre Purchare Pmject by wflch there ehall be fGquired a tobl of thirty (go) spruce trcee having a henglt of etg[t feet or $e$er (a ciange ftom numty (20) such trees) and a total of thlrty (30) aopenrrees having a caliper of two (2) to three (3) lnctres (a du.oge from 6orry (40) cucb tsces). b. rherc rlrall be cou$ructed at the locarioo identlfied aa a ,,Ngw pafiat Wdl" on Exhlbltr A oDd E a wall on the uorth boundary of the psrldng alcaldendfied on E:rhibitA whlchwall slrell be notuorethan4f inches nor.less ftnn 4o lnchee b$h and consruced of rock uratettal tdentical to otlrer rock rualle oa the Purchsfe recldcnce whtdr is to be constructed as psft of ttre Purclaec hoJect. c, The ffirioE Eatcrtal of tlre roaining walls ldentlfled as "Rock Faced Retafning Watls' on Exhlbtt A shell De constnrcted of rock naterial tdendcal to otbar rodc wallr on tlre Purchase reeldeoce whlch le to be constnrced as pan of the Pure.hase koJect. d. Pulchase chall talce dl acdon necessary or appropriate rvirh the Town of Vatl DePatbeut of Gommulrtty Develo;ment ln order to effect tbe terms of thin Senlcment Agrc€nent. 2. Wtthdrqwal of Cunullluham Auocat ln assodation with this Se'ttlement A$eeuetr! en4 upon the appmval of thle Settlenent Atrcemenr by dl partlcs and the Tontn of vatl' Ctnnlnghan shall wlttdraw hls appeal omemly pendtng beforc tbe Toum of Vatl astodiled wtth tbe purcb$e project. 3, fine. TlmelctheesscuceofthisAgrceureut. 4. Representatiorrby Counsel The Pardes adrnotrdedge and agee that they hrw becu reprcsented and advlred hy indepmdent legsl counsel of rlreir own choorlngrhroughoutallnegodadonswhle.hprecedeetheercecutionofthtrAgreemgg and in connoctloawith their exceuti,oa of this Agre€ncnr. 5. Counternarts: rdscopter Ttaqtmlttql. fhis Agteement may be slgned In couDterparts. Wtrefl s counreqran ls dgned by each prury, rhl! Agreegrent shall be o IAI OFF FAX NO. t97A2235ALA rcE PHollE 170-178-0100 l70al01r8E i {r,t't' FROM : l1'hY'3001 I I r17 o tAt ofF FAX NO. |9?A235ALA ICE PHotlE l?0'1IE El00 170110176! O"r. 1.4 2aa4 a1:1sPM P3 1-0r? P.00!/!08 F-c57 firlty blndto,g uPoa 8ll pafilet. Coptes of rhir Agrcemeot - wbether produced bv telecoplcr oiorhemttsg sbsllbe of eqpal etidence ar orlgiuale. 6. Golerntqt law. Judrdlction. V6uc. Thit Ag8cemeBt shall be conttt'ued and eoforced tn accordance wlth the lerue of 6e Sti[e of Colorado and each of the pantee hereto hereby agree 6at proper venue for any action between tbe par$ee slull be in the Dlsttlct Gourt of the Gounty of Eagle $rate of Colorado. 7. Notlce. Any nodce requlrred or desfued to be gilrcn by any pafiy to ooy onher pany shall be 3ivea to alt pardee by telecopier and by mailittg tbe same to such pa$y to tlre telecoplec number aad to tbe addregs noted below, md nodce so randntttcd brytcleco'ptcr and *o matled ghall fur all purposes hereof be as cffequal rr tbough eeryed upor euch patty h pemon at the tlme of deporithg suclr notlcp ln the nall. Fru-AlPLlllA!P If to Purclure: Via Tclacopler to: Iftocunatnghau' l;flff:]ffm Bqulder CO 80302 Vla Tdecopler to: S03.44O.9SO9 If to tbe Tovm: Town of VaiI Depesgneil of cfinnuntty Derelopnenr 111 South Frourge Road Wesl Vril co 8l6sz Vlr Telempier to: or at nrch o'tbcr addr.o "s t .ffiGiiii@by nodee ln rvrlriug to the ose1. _ L Entlre AgreenGTt. ltris Apeeuelt consritut€r ttc antlre sgFe€msrfi between rbe parrteo h€rsto wtdr rcrpect m the su\fecr manel bercof and eu}ereeries all pdor written oral or laptled undcretandtngc aioog them on rtrat ouDleit ,od* and firc pardcs aclnor{edgE- and agree tuat rhcre-are no reprerendHoru aoawrrtrndce wlth rcspect to the urniag{on comcuplatcd h6iby other &an aselprcocly sct forth hetdn, - 10. 4m€ndm€nq, Itrls egeeolent nay be amende4 modified orsupplcncoted only la roriting execwed ou belralf o! alr partrcs hereto. $ .,' t' FROM : lt '5'.1001 llr17 trrABPLrttALP o TAfl OTF FAX N0. |9?A2235ALA / lG Pl0llE e70-17s's100 e701l6r70! O.r. 1.4 2aa4 a1 :16P14 P4 T-0?? P.000/000 F-067 11. Blndlnc Effectand Benefltc, thte Agreuneat ehall be blndlry upon'and tnuremtbebenelltofthepardecandtbdrreapecfvelegnkepreeeatativerr rucceetors ard acdgE , Ptroelded that nothtng hcreh le inhded ro confer otr .tty percon other tbar tle padec her€@ or, thelr rnrpecdve successot and acsiSog, any rEhts or obllgadms. 12. Secdon and otherHeadln$. lteeecdonr and otherhcadlnge contalned iu rhts Agreemcnt are for rcfefence purpoles only anrl ehall not effect thc meaoing or lruetpretadon of thl" Ags€emmt. 13. No Anslgnrnent No party hereto sball asrlgn in whole or, In part, ghir Agreement ortE rcapec$lerigLtand obllgadoas, wldrouttlre erpreered priorutittcq consettt of the,othcr parry. 14. Watrrcr. Rcnedies. No r,rnirrcr of any brcach of aly provlclon of thic Aglrs€rncut shall be hdd to be a wairur of any or subcequent breach aad the failurc of apartyto cnforce ataDytirle anyprorddong hereof shall not be deemcd awaivef of aily rlgbt of a4r cuch psrty m rubaequeotly enforce s.ch provicloo or any orber ptwlrlon bsrcd, 15. Seltlrabtlt, gy. Iu tlre evelt any provlslon or anyrpordon oftlric AgreemEnt s!'41be hdd ltrvalld, lllcgal or urrecrforcea6le rrnder appllcable law tJre rernsitder of thls Agrrenenr shalt rendn valld ud enftrceable, r ihe purpocc and tntenl of tlre parrtee cao be prreeerrcd tn fbe abs€stc€ of aucb provEtoa. . _ 16,, 4uthorlf,rlo E'<ecurcArreenent Tlrepersons exeordngtlrie A$osmeu 61lahalf 6rf thepardee hcreto reprereottnatAeyhive fult andlawfiil authfrtyto do ro. IN Vl/tINEllS $EIEREOF the patdca barrc set thcir haqds fls of rtrc flrcr day above Boted. Tswa of VaiI: Iltle: tflErruGn FROM : l1thFl00{ ll :{0 YT t$ il$ FFX N0. '|97@2235ALA tffi|ltPLAiALP Lli 0fFlCE PlilflE t70-4f8-8500 370{7!4708 a\!. 74 2A64 ?J,.1,6PY P5 T-l?l P.00Il008 t-t57q$ tr IBaa Ff; t? $lr FI r * Ii \ t T F l'\ ET p\f; t\ B r - \$+;r\ ,;\ / $ E t E t ,q f \ tt Its g$ I T $ F*,hBrq * A t F Of,Gfrtt N\)r)tfv+..t {;\r,t\#,..'x $rf ,Y'3'>'\i;\;iz-{iq,,.r r\ -\-vk-N N3q^,) \Lt'J i K),.tr,\-V q)*){.. s l'A\t -t;,-\ E; :( 3te eTF E! t(,, oLAf ottll{lry-?00{ llr4lFRON :Il ,'',,.,,'Frsm-lBPllltlLP FRX N0. t97A2235AtAlc PltillE ll0-4r0-5t00 9I04t0(76!av. 1,4 2AA4 AL:I?PM P6T-0a7 F.000/000 F-cl7 t A *r IIr.r fru - q C. l- *+*:|'***:r**l'l't*****'t*,t******,t'a***********td.*,r*i********'i******,t***t ********:it ,t't ******{r*r}***tr* TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement * * +***'|r. * *l *****r * * * t**'r * ** 'r'r * t* * * ** a** * * ** 'r {. * * ** * r.*,} it rt **:} t*r' ** f:t * ** *,t 't 'rr * ** * * *** * *'* ** ****** Statement. Nurnber: R0400053?? Anount: $550.00 Ot/26/2OO4O4247 PM Palment Method: Check Init: dIS Notation: Permit No: DR8040015 I:G)e: DRB - New Construction Parcel No: 2103124 03 015 Sit.e Addresg: 1310 GREENI{ILL CT \rAIL Locatsion: 1310 creenhill Court, VaiI, CO Total Fees: S650. OO This Payment I $550.00 ToEal ALL Pmts: $650.00 Balance: $0. OO * *:t'r. f* rt*** * * *'|i * * ** ***** ***'t* *'t*** * * * * ** * f *tr.* * * *** * * * * * ** * * {( * * * {( i.,f * i +i.rrrr* *'* * ** *:l:} ** 't:l'l '| * t 'i {. + ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI,{ FEES 6s0.00 Buildino Materials PROPOSED MATERIALS TYpe of Material C'rt Q,rc-l 5(.-r C..1-. 36--k-s /r8 1.1*- l4o Sfortu Color A " S+"-4 N a-*u r*l Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls EKerior Lighting Other fl.,r,J 2l t!t A..A b.,rtr..4rr---f f/<,.- S/.,'*-'( .b--k 4r.--n 2f C C-- 1,-r JcrAc-r hct-+ i(-is ).fik^-,L.-.- c /.-,(lnrk G.--c J.4.. fucv-+ {l.ir, 6 -lnr^r\--.P !r-,t*J Ft.-+ Bf.rk 4a, l,'-.--! l( lu.-q----8..*^ 3f,^ -/htrt R,tk t{ rt 6(4tr"hT:j AT-r (t-rl 1a*.t) 1 P-l-t4-l>5.- (-* { Leafs Notes: Please specify the manufacturels name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. Page 6 of L2lO2lO7l02 LrC C - !.-. 'r.tft ^, 1-, I {r,'zara. .-7 g C to c.-{* c.'/ Stl..'a; PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS EXISTING TREES TO 8E REMOVED Botanical Name Common Name 4.- 5/.--,- Size 6' ,.t"Asf-^ . f.o OuantiW 7o l.4t-p.b 4l-- .*ftllel*t ?7 f\,j c Minimum Requirements for Landscaping : GROUND COVER soD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL Deciduous Trees - 2" C-aliper Coniferous Trees - 6' tn height Shrubs - 5 Gal. Square Footaoe (. rf7 Tvpe ft-ft-- Cret,to..t -O-(-f rc 1:{k _/0k Please specifo other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Page 7 of t2/o4A7/02 ooLo f 17, GLCy L?o*r 5ue b , w,.r ,. C^ S. u.( - V" r l*7c- , V L. UTILIW LOCATION VERIFICATION 'l This form is to verifo service availability and location for new cdnstruction and should be used in conjunstion with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations, The location and availability of utilities, whether they are main trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following utilities for the accompanying site plan. Authorized Siqnature Date QWESr 970,384.0238 (tel) 970.384.0257 (fax) Contact: Jason Sharp EXCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4077 (tel) Contact: Brian Sulzer HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC, 970.949.5892 (tel) 970.949.4s66 (fax) Contact: Ted Husky EXCEL ENERGY 970.262.4024 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Contact: Kit Bogart EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANTTATIONDISTRICT* | . 97O.476.748O (tel) 970.476.4089 (fax) Contact: Fred Haslee AT&T BROADBAND 970.949.t224 x 112 (tel) 970.949.9138 (fax) Contact: Floyd Salazar //zo/*b./ tKo( l-zz-n4 I lrb o4 l+..,"- *Please provide a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when obtaining approval from the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, Fire flow needs must be addressed. NOTES; 1. If the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments are made directly on the form, the Town will presume that there are no problems and the development can proceed. 2. If a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative shall note directly on the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve identified oroblems. 3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way Permit from the Department of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utilifu locations must be obtained before diqging in any public right-of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A building permit is not a Public Way oermit and must be obtained separately. Page B of LZl02l07l02 -. ') ).-/ Ll r'ii /u.L--> d^l' t4v,o<..t ffcl'a a /-4t'27-at Buildino Materials Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails I ri ..... -.,1 , i'rr , FIues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting Other PROPOSED MATERIALS Tvoe of Material Color Notes: Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip, Page 6 of I2/O2|O7/02 ,r-,T\ Aq*&;, "\ Suruey/Site ptan Reqiew ghecktist ffi, :) Department or community Deveropment I0l4nr \FvTIny ^'i.Tii;Tr,5,13"dtj,?i"f10*#u" web: www.ci.vail,co.us :::,;:,::::::::w:::::-fr :::;:*_::-'"*'deve'|'pmenL Project Address: Applicant: Submittalo Stamped survey of propertyo Civil/Site plans Survev Reouirements: o Surveyor's wet stamp and signatureO Date of SurveyO North anowo Proper scale (1"=10'or 1"=20')a Legal description \ Phone Number;4tr.rc7o o' Landscape planq 'ntle Report (Section B) o Environmental Hazards (ie. rockfall, debris flow, avalanche, wetlands, floodplain, soils)o Watercourse setback (if applicable)cl Trees o Labeled easements (i.e. drainage, utility,\- pedestrian. etc...)o Topography, a Utility locationso Adjacent roadways labeled and edge of asphalt for both sides of the roadway shown for a minimum of 250' in either dire<tion from property. tr 0 o Basis of bearings / Benchmark Spot Elevations ' tabeled right of way and property lines; including bearings, distances and curye information.a Lot Sizeo Buildable Area (excludes red hazard avalanche, slopes greater than 40olo, and floodplain) Site Plan Reouirements: L Access (check all) ar Driveway type and finished surface are shown on the site plan.o Unheated { neated (portion in ROW in a separate zone)ci Snow storage areas are shown on the site plan within property boundaries (30yo of driveway area ii unheated; 10o/o of driveway area if heated)s/ All driveway grades, dirnensions, radii are clearly noted on the site plan and conform to Development . Standards, p. 11. Steepest Section Driveway Grade (not the average grade: 3 '/. o1 Parking spaces and turning radii are noted on site plin and confornibbevelopment Standards, pp.12&14 I1. Construction Site (check all)e/ Location of all utilities and meter pits are shown on the site plan,n/ Limits of disturbance construction fencing is shown on the site plan,f I am aware that approved Staging and Construction Traffic Control Plans, as per the Manual of , Uniform Traffic Control Devices, will be necessary prior to construction,d I am aware that a Revocable Right of Way Permit will be required prior to construction. Page 11 of I2l02lO7{OZ 6 { UL Drainage (check all that apply)P The required Valley Pan is shown on the site plan as per Develgpment standards, p. 12.a, (Note: Valley pan must not be heated)t/ 4 Foot Concrete Panl't -o B Foot Concrete Panr Positive and adequate drainage is maintained at all times within the proposed site.a culverts have been provided and are labeled and dimensioned on the site plan. .,o A Hydraulic report has been provided. (As requested by Town Engineer) IV. Erosion Control (Check all that apply)a Disturbance area is greater than one half acre.o _ A separate Erosion control Plan has been professionally engineered and pE stamped.a/ Less than one half acre has been disturbed, and proper erosion control devices are shown on the sitepbn. V. Floodplain (check all that apply)o The project lies wlthin or adjacent to a 100 year Floodplain.o 100 year Floodplain is shown on the site plan.e A Fioodplain study has been provided. (Required if floodplain is within construction limits or as requested by Town Engineer)d The project does not lie within or a_djacent to a 100 year Floodplain Geologica/Environmental Hazards (check all that apply) The project lies within a Geologic/Environmental Hazard area. (See Development Standards, p. 20) AHazard Report has been provided o The project does not lie within a Geologic/Environmenbl Hazard area. VIL Grading (check all that appty) ' * tr Existing and proposed gradet/contours are providqd on the site plan. crz All disturbed areas have been returned to a 2:1 grade.d All disturbed areas not returned to 2:1 grade have been Professionally Engineered with slope protection and/or stable soils. PE stamped details are provided within plans.o Only existing contours are shown on the site plan, there is no proposed grading. VIII. Parking (check all)o' All residential and commercial parking spaces conform to the Development Standards, pp. 12&1.5, H, Retaining Walls (check all that apply) o/ All retaining walls conform to the standards in the Development Standards, p. 19.d All retaining walls and combination walls over 4 feet have been Professionally Engineered and a PE stamped detail has been provided within the plans. d All retaining walls are shown on the site plan, with labeled top and bottom of wall elevations and type of wall construction.o No retaining walls are required for this project. X, Sight Distance (check all that apply) tf 4o Proper sight distance has been attained and shown on site plan as per Development Standards, p,12.oPropersightdistancehasnotbeenattained.Exp|anationwhy:- Additional Comments Please provide any additional commenE that pertain to public Works Review, Page 12 of l2l02l07lD2. Applicants Jan OB OrS Ol:51p John Purchase eun$ase s7576-o14s p.2 Page 1 of2 From: dnockstbacol@rof.neg Sent: Thurcday, August 21, 2003 1 :57 pM To: johnlpurchase@hoUTail.com Subjece Site Visit Re: l3l0 Glen Lyon Road John L. Purchase 754 E. Potato Patch Dr Vail, CO 81657 DEarMr. Purchase: At your request I visited th3 can{oned-pro- p9ry today with you for the purpose of providing my generalopinion of the debris flow hazard to wfi* tnei"J lr.fp*..drArt;;;"*uy, Toum of Vait geotogrcI-*{ maps suggest that the e)(treme westem edge of the lot is included in the moderate debris flowhazard category. The lot is located at the easJem-edge of a smatl alluvial fan developed at the mouth of a modestdrainage. The moderate debris floi zone O"*O-^ i: dr; alo;;'a low but distina ridge that will keepany debris flow material over the fan to the west df tdpnrperryfr tlt! *ta"-*"" of aoflon ct* LyonRoad itself; the current Pdmuty chanuel of the drainagJi, i'"rr r'iitrr" *""t. rt i, in fact not completelyclear if the t'azardzoneincludis any.o.f thg p;n"rt" oi irthe zone and property boundaries are ictrattycoincidenq lEin anv case tle hazaia is miiimla. iiail;i.,jilioJ*io"orpot" rhe exfieme west endof theparcel, Town of Vail rqulations can be sarisfied q,.".ril6th;itlr. pru*ot drain4ge regime isnot significantly altered, w.tricfr oan be accomplis4ea uy ftfreavi"E trt" riag" mentioned above in place 3l"ltj1iy^":dtc equivalent structures in fi;ar draids;a;st-(A ;;" n rn ,i-pi"-*Jor"u!. ordrsh[banoes, to constnrctionof berms or rock walls, o.Io .onii."tion oiTounaatioo.'ru*,.i*ilowithstand and^dfect potential,dcbris flow); -a 1u1it"*ti;t r"did;; of oristing drainage on theeastern part ofthe cul-de-sac-by consruclion orl ldi""way "itrr* "itrt" "-isting grade ofthe road or ona slight up-grade into the lotJbn that portion that may lie#fl,i;A;;60"d hazard zong which Iestimate at no more than 15 feet. In t}*Ttty,."lthough the debris flow hazard to which the property is exposed is not nonodstent it isminimal, and there is nothing to indicate ttrat "ortr.ruq"ire,i t" ""ripfy-o,itn fo*n of Vail requirementsregarding the mapped hazard category will be significant q,t;:;G; ;';diog of rhe wesrem part of ne*[|:r#T*rfvou have anv quistions or'""quit*y tunh;;-itiforlrr"irioo"Itni, m"!i;fi" Siacerely, BruceA. Collinq ph.D. Consulting Geologist cPG7016 Bruce A. Collins, Ph.D., C.p.G. dba Collins & Associues Geological & Natural Resource Consultants r/8t2004 Punchssco P.O. Box 23 Silt, Colorado 81652 USA bacol@rof.net Phone/Fax (97 0>87 6-5 4OO 97o:476-Olif9 P.3 O ?zseZoil Jen O8 Oz+ Ol:Slp u812004 a ,), ,,- )-'(t"r' HUt 6.ta 854131 P.g.: I ot Itart1rm L D ra.sa . .-,...., .i;.ir"/n...., ). . iftp offq,, *"oC.qp ihis d.y or rretrlrn . JoHN o. lrHlB of the _ Cq'|tt of WARRANTYDEED JOHI{ I,AYTON ruTCHASEAND LTRA JUNE PURCHASE a'- /-l| ': '?>z t-0) dlo!! t.!.t *e' i"-- Mldd(&lrlrlltbl6l t All ffilMl 751 p0TATO PATCH DRIIE- UAIL- CO At6s7 ot thc _ cd'|ty of _E q!E_ sd st!t. of of th€ G.flrtcc(s): WITNASS. Ih.t th. Gr.ntor(i). for .fd ih co.Ei&mtiofl ot th. .ur ot ( $625.1m.m ) 's sii Hrrdrld Talnly Fiv. Tln -r.r|d rd |Ivl(D ... IX)LI,ARS tne ..c.ipt -rd ruttici.rEy ol dricl 13 hcf.bt .ctndt.dg.d. hs. g.Irt.d. b..CbirEd, sotd rd cdwly€d, td by th6e p.esant3 6e3 grdrt, b.sEin, sett. co.$/€y ..d cdrfir. urto the Gr.ntce(s). th.ir hcirs sd a8sisns loreFr, not in te.i..Ey in ccn hlt in joint tcidlct, .tl th..!€t p.operty, togeth!. rith i4'rolr*nts. if J|y. situatc, tyir€ ild b.in9 in thc _ co.nty ot EaCLE and st.tG ot cotordo, .lc.c.ib.d.c fottc: Lin17. AMENTED ptar.mE6N3uED-rvrslo - AC@-RDING To rfle plrr *rcoloeo tr{]arE i]^ct-E couNTY RECDRDS. COUI{TY oF EACLE, STATE OF COI,ORAD0. .lso lrpt.r as rtr.ct I[-e. I3IOGREENHILL COURT. VAIL Caal6Jt TOCETHER rith .tt .nd slrEirla. .td h.rcditGrti .rd atFft.rwtces th.r.to bctslgin9, or in cnyrise +ertainingdd the rcversiar Jd revefsia|s, r.cinder dd rcPi.d.rs. rents, issrEs rd p.ofits thcrc{f; fld all th! estate, rilhttitl. irt.r6t. cl.i. rd dsn d|ltsocttr ot thc Grdltor(!), eith.r in lar or .qrity, of, in ed to thc.borc ba.g€itEdp...is.3, r.ith th! h€fcdi tGrt! rd Tprrt€ndEes;m IIAVE AllD TO HOLD th.s.id pr.rii.s &v! b.rrEined rd describcd yith rffu.tloancesr rnto the Gr t€c(s),thlir hlirs -d 63i9'lr forever. lh. Gr$to.(s), for hir.!tf. his h.ir3 lrd Frrarlt rcprB.nt.tiver, docs covcrxnt, barg.in. .rd ag.ee to atd |.ith the Gr.nte?(.r, thlir h.irs ..d aErig.E, that .t the tiE ol th! "nseat irE rd d.tivery of th6G Prca€nt., he is |€lt 3lizcd ot th. F!.i!€s .bov. cqw€yld, ha. go.d, 3r|.., Frfcct. abotute fld iri.l.s.ib{e .st.t. ot inhcrit.r€e, in tar. in f6 si?tG, rd hs sood risht, tutt F... ..d llrtul ruthori ty to g..nt, bd.sf,in.!.lt dd cdrvty th. 3- in EEr and fo.. G .tr.s.id. rd tft.t t|i. s.- ..G fra dd ct.ar f....tt fo.*r ard oth€.grrrt3, b.rieirE, s.16, ti€tr., taxas. 6E6.Dnts, .iElra.rEe. ..d ..stridioft3 of rhat€vcr kind or rratt|.c socvar, EXCEPT GET{ER,AL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS F()R TflE YEAR lxB AND SUESEQUENT YEARS. TAX2 Ih. Gtmto.(s) shatt rd vitt ll tl IT rlo f(nEv€t D€ttD th. lbov€ b.rgaiEd tr!.i!e3 in thc $i.t rd Fscobl.posiB5im ot tie Grfitc€(sr, hir h.i.6 :fd arig[|s. {air|.t rtt {td lvcry F..!.r or F.sdE Lsfutly ctriainr thc aiotco. dry F t throt. Ih. iin{ullr n-.. G$.ll Inctd. rhe ptur.l, srd th! Flu.rt thc iirEul.r, rd ihc (|3. of iry g.rjcr shatt be a99tic.bt. to.lt gsr&f8. lN Wm{ESS WfiARPOF .hG Grdrtor(i) h.. Grecutcd this decd cr ttc d.t. 3!t forrh &vc- instfl-nt r.s ack Frlc4€d bcforc E .n this d.y o( ard statc o{ Cd(rrdo , of the Gr-tor(s), tE e!r.$.d5.-:P;l 3 JzaS , ffiIH,USIHHilru rittct vlo0e2z50 Forr ro. 92lA l€e 4-94. sr^rE of r L '-e-172{4 >04ri J^,, * Qn*.*t-i* '."i, e*d;-'*ril* ? - /4 -Jo o/ : li trl.ca-{y t |ld id officiat scrl- -:... .-"-..'J.it]t.-'.. _' .1 -l land Title Guarantee Conpany DaB: JawryE,,?fra ,OHN I.AYTON PURCIIASE AI..ID IARA ruNE PIJR,CI{ASE 13TO GREENHILL @I'RT v^tr- o|El6J7 h.loscd Dlc$q 6nd the rirle inware policy for yourpropa.ty loettd il l3l0 GREENHIIJ- COtIpr vllr rrr nrrie Thc followi4g cndo,rscmcrrs irc irrcJrdcd ir fiis policy; Dclaion of Bn:rprions l-3 Delaion of Gmal Exccpriol l Plerse rcvicw rhis policy il is emkety. h tbe weu thar you find ray rliscrcpary, or if yoo lave aly quesriols rcgrrdilg your trnal drh policy, yol ltlay coftrct Tirlc Dcprrhar tuo*:90-476-?251 Fu:nU,'64732 Pleasc rcftr to oorOdcrNo. V50q8250 Sbould you dcidc n sclf rlc propcny dcrcribtrl io &is policy, or if yol ele rcgsird ro pulritns r res rirte cottr'ltrmcot ftr trongagc purposcs, you Eley b? cniirled o a credit o*ild frtltr€ tide insoraw;c pwrniums- r 'rxr Tialc Guenlltce Coryany will rcain r copy of rhis policy so wc sill bc able to providc foiurE producrs rt|.r scrvices & you qnckly and cfiffciortly. Tbmk you for gvitrg ns rbc opporoniry ro sctre you. $lccrely, laud Tide Guararce Coryuy .'v J3e vccr o f-!tt T.vuttv$a t-vt 3 LTGFolicyI{0. CrAtj(XXEl50 OurOrdcrNo. V50002250 Sch.dulc A Amoln3 t625,0@.00 topcrty Addrcss: l3l0 GREENHILL COURT VAIL CO 816j7 l. folictDile Ocober l?, 2fi1[f at 5:00 p,M, 2, Nerue of Imrcd: JOHN I,AYTON PTJRCXTASB AND LARA JUNE PUR,CIIASE 3. Itc GstaE tr inttttst in tt: lard dcscribcd or rrfared to in ttris Schcduh aod which is covercd by tbis poticy is: A Fcc Sinplc 4. Titts to &e csrate or hlcrest covcrcd by &is polity et tbe drte hcrcof, is vesrcd ir: JOHN I.AYTON PURCHASEAND I.ARA JI'I{E PURQIASE 5. I[e hnd rcfcrrcd fo in tbb dict ir dcrcribd as fdtors: LoT 17, AMENDED PLA,T GISN LYON SUBDlvrSlON, AC@RD|NGTO THE pLAr R€CoRDED tN TI{E EAGLE @UNTY RE@RDS, @UNTY OF EACT.E, STATE OF COI.oRADO. Tbis Folicy valid ooly if Sclcrluh B lr rftaclcd. Iad Tith Gleralnc Compcny R.grecmtirg Cbicego ftdr lnsurarce Comlery Our Ondcr No. V5000250 I. Schcdulg B Ttris policy does mt insure sgrilsr loss or druge (o,rd rhe Conpany will mt pr,y costs, r.rrrncys, fecs or erp311sc{)wlict arise by reasoa of: Gcrtr.rl Ercqrriols: RiShrS or cl:tlns of prnics in possessioa aot shown by rhc prblic ecorrds. ft5grrpnr<, g; nhinrc of alscrqots, oor sbo*u by &c pubtic records. Discrqpuirs. contlicts in bouudrry liro, shoregc iu uEe, c[ctor.hm.nr<, rrd eny frcts which r corrEc! survey rrr,ioseccdoo of Sc premias w,oulO disctosc ra *i* arc noi stown uy ruc prbtic rccords. Auy tico, or dght @ r tia, br services, labc, or matcriel lpctofore or hcreafier fumishcd, iraposcd by taw urdmt showl by 6c public rccords. 2OO3 TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS NOT YET DI,'E OR PAYABI-E. R,IGHT OF WAY FOR DTTG{ES OR CANALS MNSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORTTY OF THEUNTTED STATESAS RESERVED IN T'NITED STATES PATENT RE@RDED DECEMBBR29, 1920, lN x)ox 93 AT PAOE 42- RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITTJRE OR R,EVERTER dAUSE, BUT OMTTINGANY COVENANT oR, RESTRICI(oN BASED oN RA@, @LoR. RELIGIoN,sE'(, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS oR NATIONAL oRrcIN t NLEss AND oNLy ro TIIEEX1TNT TIIAT SAID @\'ENANT (A) TS E(EMPT T'NDER C}IAPIER,42, SEENON 3607 OPTIIE UNITED STATES 6DE OR (B) REI-ATES TO HANDICA,P BUT DOES NOT DISCRTMINATE AGAINST HANDICAP PERSONS, AS CDNTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDEDAPRIL ()4, I97E, IN BOOK 268 AT PAGE 698 AND AS AMENDED IN TNSTRI'MENT RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1987, rN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 447 TI{R,OUGT| 47J AND ASAMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RE@RDED SEFTEMBER 15, DT', IN BOOK 469 AT PA6E 8OIAND AS RE@RDED SEPTEMBER,3, 1987 IN BOOK {69 AT fAGE 38 AND 39 AND AMENDMENT THERETO REORDED N(AY 2, 1990 lN soOK 52E AT pAC€ t54. EASEMENT AND RIOHT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTEIT{ANCE OF AN ELECTRJC STSTEM, A5 GRANTED TO }IOLY CROSS ELECTRJC ASg)CIATTON BY GORE CREEK ASSOCIATES, IN TI{S INSTRUMENT RECORDED APR,IL 2{, T978 IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE277. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICfIONS AS SHOWN AND RESERVED ON TT{E RECORDED AMENDED PI.AT OF CLE}I LYON SUBDTVISION. ITEMS T T}fiOUG}I 3 OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS UNDERSCHEDULE BI ARE IIEREBY l. 4. 5. 7. 6. 9. LnGhticrrfr. Cr@d Ou0rdcrNo. V50O022S0 Scfcdulc E DEI..ETED, ITEIU NO. 4 OF lI{E GENEN,AL E(CEPTIONS t5 DELEre E(CEPT AS TO ANY LIENSRESI'LTINGFROM woRr( oR MATERIAL or.rlinctro FoR oR FuRI.[sirED Ar rHE ReuEsrOF'OHN I.AYTON PT'RCII^SE AND I.EN.C.]U-I.IE PUNCTASE. MSNHotnail -Page I of I msr#. Hotmail* lo hn I pu rchase ad hotmai l. com Frcm : dnocks <bacol@rof.net> SGnt: Thursday. August 21,2003 1:57 PM To:iJhnlpurchase@hotrnail.com $bj€ct : Site Visit Re: 1310 Glen Lyon Road John L. Purchase 754 E. Potato Patch Dr. Vail, CO 815s7 Dear Mr. Purdrase: At your request I visited the captioned property today with )ou for the purpce of providing my general opinion of the debris floi hazard to which the lot is expo6ed. As you are away, Towrl of vail geologic hazard map6 suggest that the extreme l^|estem edge of the lot is included in the moderate debris flow hazard category. The lot is locded at the eastem edge of a small alluvial fan developed at the mouth of a modest drainage. The moderate debris f,ow zone boundary is drawn alongi low but distinct ridge that will keep any debris flow material over tfie fan to the west of the pmperty, in the culde-sac of and on Glen Lyon Road itself; the current Fimary channel of the drainage is t\tell to the west. It is in fact not completely clear if the hazard zone includes any of the property or if the zone and property boundaries are actually coincjdent, but in any c6e tf|e hazard is minirnal. If the boundary does incorporate the extrerne r,vest end of the parcel, Town of Vail regulations can be satisfied by assuring that the present drainage regirne is not significandy altered, whici can be accornplished by (a) leaving the ridge mentioned above in place or by incorpording equivalent structlres in final drainage deson (can range from simple nesbration of distufiances, to construction of berms or rock walls, or to construction of foundations jufficiernto wihstand and direct potential debris flow); and (b) preventir€ redirection of existing drainage on the eastern part of the cul-de-sac by constructjon of a dri\reway either at the existing grade of the road or on a slight up-grade into the lot for that portion that may lie within the mapp€d hazard zone, which I estimate at no more than 15 feet. In summary, allfiough the debris flow hazard to which the prop€rty is expo,sed is not nonodstent it is minimalr and there is nothing to indicate tnat costs required to comply with Town of Vait requirements regarding the mapped hazard category will be significart unless major regrading of the western part of $e lot is desired. If you have any questions or require any furthet information at this time olease do hesitate to contact me. Sincerdy, Bruce A. Collins, Ph.D. Consulting Geologbt cPG 7016 Bruce A. Collins, Ph.D., C.P.G, dba Collins & Associat€s Geological & Naturd Resour@ Consultants P.O. Box 23 Slt, Colorado 81652 USA bacol@rof.net Phone/Fax (9rc)-876-5400 http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/gefinsg?curmbox:F 151629646&a:d56cc7c87 ... l/2212004 Status: I Approved Gorvrruumry DEVELopMENT Rounnc Fonur -[ npproved with conditions I Denied Routed To:Mike VafEllfir FIRE Date Routed:02t02t04 Routed By:Planner Date Due:ozt09t04 Description of work:New Construction, Single-family residence Address:1310 GreenhillCourt Legal:Lot:117 lBlock:Subdivision:Glen Lyon Gomments:Date Reviewed: Need additional review bv Fire Department. (C.L1*. Status: I Approved corvtnufiry DevelopmENr Rourilc Fonn I Approved with conditions 8 Denied Routed To:Leonard Sandoval, PW Date Routed: Routed By:Planner Date Due: Description of work:New Construction . SFR Address:1310 Green HillCt. Lesal:Lot:17 Block:Subdivision:Glen Lyon Gomments:Date Reviewed: Fire lssues.Need additional review by Fire Provide Title Heated portion of driveway in TOV Right of way must be on a separate zone, marked at control box. Per TOV standards. Show on site plan. Show on site - Limits of disturbance fence. Show on site olan - Erosion control olan per TOV standards. Swale on north side of lot is show flowinq up hill. Adiust and revise Norht side of lot, existing grade exceeds 2:1, when disturbed, grade must return to 2:1. or must be approved bv staff and DRB. Adiust and revise. Provide stamped approved drawing from a license PE for retaining wall exceeding 4 - 6 ft. in Drawino to be submitted when aoolvino for buildinq permit. Fire Sprinkler svstem is required. Home exceeds the Fire department hose requirements. Proposed tree on north side of driveway on landscaping plan must be moved back 10 ft from of asphalt. adiust and revise. Revcable of is lsandoval -tf p -..l r r,,.! Department of C ommunity Deve lopment 75 South Frontage Road Vail. Colorado 81657 970-479-21 38 FAX 970-479-2452 www.ci.vail.co.us February 23,2004 Michael Lauterbach POB 3451 Vail, CO 81658 Dear Michael, Pursuant to our conversation on February 18,2004, the following are comments from the Design Review Board (DRB), Planning, Public Works, and the Fire Department: DRB: - It is essential that the Northwest elevation of the house be done with extreme care and sensitivity for the neighbor on that (downhill) side. Details in key areas, such as underneath the deck, will be extremely important.- Does the deck (NW elevation, mid level) really need to be that large? It seems that it could overwhelm the neighbors. Perhaps if you could clip back one or both comers of that deck, some trees might be saved.- The knee (elbow) braces used throughout the design are not in character with the rest ofthe architecture ofthe house (i.e. the braces are arched and notched, whereas there is nothing else in the architecture indicative ofthat shape). - ' The windows, especially on the NW elevation, are incongruous and have no relationship or harmony with one another in terms of placement. They appear to be a hodgepodge ofdiffelent shapes and sizes.- The retaining wall for the drivewhy on the NW side of the property should not be just a sheer cement wall with stucco, but perhaps a sloped boulder wall would be better and soften the effect upon the adjacentneighbor. Planning: - As a portion of this property is identified as being in the ModerateHazard Debris Flow Area, properly engineered mitigation measures must be taken during any grading on the extreme westem portion of the property. - Please provide a topographical map with the proposed structure drawn on it with all roof ridge elevations shown in relation to the contour line below so that the maximum roof height can be properly verified. {g *r"ouo rnru* - After digitizing the proposed floor plans, the calculated GRFA on the mid and upper levels is much higher than what you have shown. Please confirm.- AII crawlspaces must be less than five feet (5') in head height and have an access opening no greater than twelve ( 12) square feet. Please show on plans.- The Plant Schedule shown on sheet Ll indicates that the only trees to be planted on the site are Colorado Blue Spruce and Quaking Aspen. Please veriff. - The limits of disturbance fence cannot be on the actual property line, especially on the north/northwest side of the site. Public Works: - The heated portion of the driveway situated in the Town of Vail (TOV) right- of-way must be on a separate zone and marked at the control box. Per the TOV standards, show this on the site plan.- Show on the site plan: a Limits of Disturbance Fence.- Show on the site plan: an Erosion Control Plan per the TOV standards.- The swale on the north side of the lot is shou.n as flowing uphill. Please adjust and revise. - Existing grade on the north side of the lot exceeds 2: 1 . When disturbed, the grade must retum to 2: l, or must otherwise be approved by the Design. Review Board and staff. Please adjust and revise.- Provide an approved, stamped drawing from a licensed P.E. for retaining walls that exceed 4-6 feet in height. The drawings are to be submitted when applying for the building permit.- A fire sprinkler system is required since the proposed residence exceeds the hose length standards of the Fire Department.- The tree proposed to be planted on the north side of the driveway must be moved ten feet (10') back from the edge ofasphalt. Please adjust and revise.- A Revocable Right-of-Way Permit is required in association with this proposal. Fire Department: - The Fire Department requires 360 degree circumferential travel around the structure, which cannot be achieved with this proposal. - The highestridge beam is 95' from approved staging.- There is a second ridge beam that appears to be approximately 44' above approved staging.- With the 6' rock wall in back of the house, there is no rear access.- There are combustible materials 30' above the approved staging.- An automatic fire sprinkler system is required, as is a monitored fire alarm system, given the information provided in your submittal. If you have any questions conceming the comments listed above, please contact me directly. In order to proceed with this application for final review on the March 3,2004, DRB agenda, the aforementioned issues must be addressed, and new materials received, no later than 12:00 noon, Monday, March 1,2004. Sincerely,, r, ,,%44M Mafthew R. Gennett, AICP Town Planner The Town of Vail (970) 479-2140 February 26,2004 Matt Gennett, AICP Town Planner Town of Vail Community Development Vail, CO E1657 Dear Matt: I took a "rough cut" at placing the Purchase residence 30 ft from the northwest lot line instead of 15 ft. I am enclosing a layout of it. Because the lot widens, I think the home now fits on the lot much better, gives them a nice buffer of mature trees rather than new landscaping and gives me much better privacy. I think it is "win-win". I also think there are many more trees saved than show on the topo. I estimate the driveway will be lengthened about 20 ft. at about an 87o slope. This slope should not be a problem because the driveway was already going to be heated. Please call me on my cell (303 - 947-2749) with yourthoughts. I also want to thank you for your very prompt faxing of the DRB preliminary review. Yours sincerelv. {>. t. gi-t..-=--> Barry Cunningham Status: I Approved co"tut y DEVELopMENT nourilc Fonrrl I Approved with conditions E Denied Routed To:Leonard Sandoval. PW Date Routed: Routed By:Matt Gennett Date Due: Description of work:Revisions Address:1310 GreenHillCt. Legal:Lotr 117 Block:I Subdivision:Glen Lyon Comments:Date Reviewed: Fire rtment lssues. Need additional review by Fire Provide title Provide oradinq plan is proposed drainage swale to flow when it Revocable riqht of it - Buildinq permit staqe Stamoed PE d for retainino wall- buildinq Dermit stage. lsandoval March2,2004 Town of Vail Desigr Review Board 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Design Review Board Members and Town of Vail Staff; As the neighbor immediately below the proposed Purchase home, I am extremely concerned about its impact on my property. Because it is elevated on piers to provide covered parkinq, it has far more bulk and mass than is necessary, thus creating a structure that is out of scale with the neighborhood. Its very large deck also has a very negative affect on my privacy, particularly since the building site is presently at the minimum 15 ft. setback As you are aware, the covered parking and the deck are not counted in the GRFA but they certainly affect the mass of the house and I believe make this design closer to a commercial building than a private home. Because of this, I think the house should be treated differently and moved to the south approximately 35 ft. from the lot line to take advantage of the existing buffer of mature pine and aspen trees. The present topo map submitted to the DRB is very misleading because it does not show all the existing trees. The additional setback would provide a buffer of over 20 mature trees and the building site placement would actually be more compatible with the neighboring homes, as required by 10A in the Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook. The house imrnediately to the west of lot 17 was constructed right on Greenhill Court, with no landscaping between it and the cul de sac. However, the next 3 homes to the west are all set back from the road, as I am proposing, with their garages E ft. to 12 ft. above Greenhill Court. My proposal would cause the driveway to be about the same tength as at the other homes and the revised building site would provide more privacy for Mr. Purchase and me. Overall the house would be much more compatible with the neighborhood. I believe this project should be suspended until the privacy and neighborhood compatibitity problems can be further studied. In addition. I would like to see the Town Staff further address the following: Tree Survey - Section l2-Ll-4 of the Town Code outlines the submittal requirements for a DRB application. A survey is required which indicates all trees with trunks of 4" or greater measured l' above grade. The survey that was submitted only indicates a select few large conifers. When reviewing the plans, the tree survey gives a very inaccurate perceptionlhat there are few trees being impacted by the driveway and building footprint. In order to meet the code requirement and to provide an accurate depiction of the impacts of the project we request that no further review by the DRB be conducted on this project until such time as an accurate tree survey has been provided. Additionally, the Code also required that the landscape plan depict all trees being removed. This requirement has also not been met and therefore further review by the DRB should be suspended. Design Review Board March 2,2003 Page2 SlopeiSite Coverage - Section 12-21-14 of the Town Code requires that where proposed buildings and driveways are located on slopes in excess of 30o/o, the site coverag€ allowed is reduced to l5o/o of the site area. The site is 23,371 sq. ft. in area and thus the resulting allowable site coverage is 3,559.6 sq. ft. Has a detailed measurement been provided to substantiate this requirement? Additionally, there are other requirements of section 12-21-14 such as providing a soils and foundation report from a professional engineer. The DRB should discontinue its review of the project if these requirements have not been submitted. Geology Report - The geologic hazardreport provided by the applicant seems somewhat inadequate to allow proper review and evaluation by staffor the DRB. The report does not provide clear direction, as there are no maps or graphics depicting the areas ofconcern or depicting mitigation measures. It is clear from the report that the geologist has not reviewed the proposed development plan to offer whether or not the proposed project complies with the Haz.afi Regulations. Further, the report does not contain the proper findings as required by section 12-21-15 of the Town Code. The report is not stamped or signed by a "professional geologist." The DRB should discontinue review ofthis project until an adequate site-specific, geologic investigation/report has been prepared and submitted to the Town. In summary, this proposed home is located on the far north boundary of a large development site. There is ample space with adequate access to move the proposed structure further to the south. Moving the home to the south and modifying the driveway location will allow the applicant to maintain a natural landscape buffer to the homes to the north. The site is heavily forested and it makes sense to preserve mature trees and vegetation where it creates compatibility and provides physical and visual buffers to adjoining properties. Having the home moved to the south will help make the project consistent with the design guidelines, thus furthering the goals of the Town. Yours sincerely, $.r. &>- Barry Cunningham ) BEC:ka 6"n (lovt Lzf rz TOI4'NM Design Review Board ACTION FORM Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us Project Name: PURCHASE CHANGE DRB Number: DR8040430 Project DescripUon: CHANGES FOR A New single family residence Participants: OWNER Purchase, John & Lara 08/20/2004 Phone: 754 Potato Patch Drive Vail co 816s7. License: APPUCANT STEVEN JAMES RIDEN, AIA 08/20/2004 Phoner PO BOX 3238 VAIL co 81658 License: Project Address: 1310 GREENHITI CT VAIL LocaUon: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO Legal Descriptionr Lot: 17 Block Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB. Parcel Number: 210312403015 Commentsr see condiUons BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date ofApproval: 09/15/2004 Conditions: Cond: I (PUN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (PI-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Gond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 otilons-Residentia I o, at terciat Application for Design Review R *. General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requiremen$ for the particular approval that is requested. An applicaton for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received 'by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teli 97 0.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479'2452 web: www.vailgov.com Description of the Request: LocationoftheProposal: r-ot /? alock:- 5u66iuir1on kL(/ LfiCN physicarAddress: 11/ a (nCfflVllttt CT ' VA tu , co 816 S I parcef No.: 2 | O ? | |-Y a'2 ol { (contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: Name(s) of Owner(s):-'n,tn/ E *za Puzclrn{Purt Mailing Addressr OF (A *-c2 &tUs7 - 36 Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicane SSTUvat dnwa; clOry 4tA Mailing Address:o.Y JZ3 X Lo YlLf ['' E-mail Address: Type of Review and Fee: D Signs E Conceptual Review E New Construction tr Addition El Minor Alteration (multi-fam ily/commercial ) O Minor Alterauon .1gingl+familY/duPlex) d Changes to Approved Plans - Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild' $fOO For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions)' $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing,painting,windowadditions,landscaping,fencesandretaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining /.-' . walls, etc. 6Zo) For ievisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or $e Design\--'z Review Board. No Fee Page 1 of t2104/28104 t ZOND CI{ECKJt Lcgal dcscription: Lot A d drcss Osncr Architcct Zonc disrrict Q Lot sizc Allorvcd Existin s:z!35: o *=lrl toP + 675 = 425 crcdir plus 250 addition ' Ll6x tot@ = 1'fu4.38> fioao z l,rroo(Docs tlris rcqucst involvc a 250 Addition? L.rndscaping Rcaining Wall Hci ParUng Caragc Crcdit Drivcrvay Conrplics rrirb TOV Liglting Arc finishcd gradcs lcss tlan 2:l Enr.ironmcntal4lazards Prcr,ious cbndirions of approval (cbcck propcrty filc); ls rhc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc: Irllo Horv much.of tlc allo\vcd 250 Addition is uscd rvirh fiis rcqucst? Sitc Covcralc Hcigbt Sctbacks .13{1?31 = ),ls(6 r. .!,U .l5' I <l (i00) (500) (e00) (t200) Pcrmittcd Slopc Proposcd Slopc 9zn Ycs_=_ No Ycs-- No I ) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >302. 2) Floodptain 3) Wcrl 4) Wdtcr Coursc Sctback (50) 5) Ocologic Hazards a) SnorvA b) Rocldall c) Dcbris Fl "t":ry-rius €rle^ LV on S, L"/;a=,2.L Pbonc Total GRFA Prinrary ORFA -+ 1+ZS1 1et5ry = srcondary GRFA + (125) (67j+) . Proposcd Tota! . - Rcmaining * 6.ott0 = 6rogiQ Jjttj -r^al6{.,. = '- --;46lxr- o tt rsrr)rJilrc ^on*J"rr"o I , czls to,I uondFrscp te3if :lJEunllut g cp)s ; I ilr^uns D 4cc lo:4 LTr 0 J,g1\ 2iw{ v,& 0 + * + * + * * ** * * * * * * * * {. + * * * ** * * {. * + *,t 'i * * * * r. * * * * ir * * * * * * * * * * * **t r. *:} r.1. * * ** * * * * * * * + * + {. * + + + *:} t + * * * *'l '} * * TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 09-15-2004 atl7z45:27 09/15/2004 Statement * * * * * * * * * * + * + + * * * * * *'l +:t + + * * * * ****+**** * ********** ******* ** * * * * * *,1. * * ** * * lr * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * Statsemenu Number: R040006470 Amount: $20.00 08/20/2OO4O2:52 P|II Paltment Method: Check Init: JS Notation: #1266,/STEVE RIDETiI Permit No: DR8040430 1)4>e: DRB-Chg t.o Appr Plans Parcel No: 210312403 015 Site Addrese: 1310 GREEIIHILL CT VAIL IJocation: 1310 creenhill Court, Vail, CO Total Fee.s : $20 . 00 This Pa)ment: $20.00 Total AI.,L Etnts: 920.00 Balance: $0.00 * +'i t * * 'f * * *** * * * ** + * * *** * * * * + t * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * + * +:i ** * + {. * * *:1.:t:} * * + '1. * * t + ** * * * + * + * * * * * * * * * * * ACCOI]NT ITEM LIST: Account Code Descriptjon Current Pmts DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00 o *#n Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 telt 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us DRB Number: DR8040481 Location: 1310 GREENHILL CT Project Name: Project Description: PURCHASE CHANGE NEW SFR Lot: 17 Block Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB. 210312403015 see condiuons Participants: OWNER PURCHASE, JOHN 0911012004 Phone:390-9943 754 POTATO PATCH DRIVE E. VAIL co 81557 License: APPUCANT STEVEN JAMES RIDEN, AIA ARCH09/10/2004 Phone : 949-4I2I PO BOX 3238 VAIL co 816s8 License: C000001738 1310 GREENHILL CT VAILProiect Address: Legal Description: Parcel Number: Comments: Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Approval: 09/15/2004 Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $20.00Plannen I RECEIVEB - r':. r tt_ r'u. ,. v =. Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.mm General lnformation: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request: Application for Design Review- Ctl*^lcrc To U:7,a^1 Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address:b, Owner(s) Signaturr Name of Applicant: Mailing Address: E-mail Address: Type of Review and Fee: . Signs . Conceptual Review . New Construction. Addition . Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) . Minor Alteration (single-family/duplex) . Changes to Approved Plans . Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $6s0 $300 $2so $20 /lizu, No Fee For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. re(s): For Office Use Only: FeePaid: n O - ct*rno.,lZbb Meeting Date- €-tg<J3 DRB No.:Planner: JIA ; Proiec lattlllatt*+t*lrtl*al*f ltt*tlf t*l'|**t******a**a'|la'l***l*ttl***r*l+l**la* TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statcmeot *all***+a+a***ri*'itat*l'|at*l+tll**l*tr,|*'|*at'ittaat*t*a***t*r***llaa*'l*t*+a';*attl*l*iala****l* gtatenent l$rnt er: R0r10005623 Amount: $20.00 09/lO/2OO4O3:17 Pll Palment Method: Caeh PT'RCHASB Init: dIS Notation: S/JOHN Perml.t l{o: DRB040tl81 Tt4re: DRB -Mlnor A1t, SFR/DUP Parcel No: 210312{03015 Site Addreaa: 1310 GREEBIHIIJJ CT I,AIIJ Location: 131.0 OREEIIHIIJIJ CT Total Feee: $20.00 This Palmeat: 920.00 Total ALIJ Pmta: S20.00Balance: $0.00*aa*'Slaaaatfaalattttta*t*t*a**t+a*:|*taat'i*a*****t*a**ata******aar**'ta+ataatrt*r*a*l+taalllal ACCOI,JNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current ffis DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIE|'J FEES 20.00 Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of C-ommunity Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail. Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us Project Name: Purchase Residence DRB Number: DRB040016 Project Description: Final review of a new single family residence Participants: OWNER Purchase, John & Lara OLl26l2O04 Phone'. 754 Potato Patch Drive Vail co 81657 License: APPLICANTMichaelLauterbach 01/2612004Phone: PO Box 3451 Vail co 81658 License: ProjectAddress: 1310 GREENHILL CTVAIL Location: 1310 Greenhill Couft, Vail, CO Legal Description: Lot: 17 Block3 Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB. Parcel Number: 210312403015 Comments: see conditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Viele Second By: Woldrich Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 03/03/2004Vote: 5-0 .,";;;", i. '4'1'*-'o^'{ ;-P"l< Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: CON0006326 That the applicant revises the design review board plans to depict the relocation of the house 8 - 9 feet further back (to the southeast) on the lot to provide more of a buffer for the neighbor to the NE, prior to application for a building permit. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paidr $650.00 Application for Design Review Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Fronbge Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479'2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us t,r(,'ol.^.- t--- T014,[,m General Information: one year of the approval, Description of the Request: All prclects requiring design review must receive approval prior to s:bmitting a building permit applicabon. ?lease refer to the submittal requirements for the particulai approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted untii all required information is received by the Community Development Departrnent.- The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. beiign review approval lapses unless a bulldlng permlt ls issued and construction coynences wit'lrin Location of the Proposa l: tot: 17 dock:- Subdivision: 6 l e n LY ' n Ptrysical Address: parcel No.: 2 | o j t > | d 3. I S (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Name of Applicant: E-mail Address:Fax: -1r'oAttp-reAt{iQ e.n ct31-.h-{ *rypeitRevidwandFee: /tr-51^rnef .afo17(-1 . n'f E y'rgns $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area' d Conceotual Revierrv No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild' tr Addition is00 :nilXTli"J,r[i"hn:.Jfr'S;".ffi:"1olT.l?,:fl"ff:l:,tl:].* tr Minor Alterataon $250 For minor changeslo buildings and site improvements, such as, (multi-family/commercial) reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. tr Minor Alteration $20 For minor dranges to buildings and site improvements' such as' (single-family/duptex) reroofing, pairiting, window additions, landscaping, fences and D Changes to Approved Plans tr Separation Request retaining walls. etc. $20 For revisions to Plans Design Review Board. No F€e already approved by Planning Staff or the }r, r!, F$8ff?'Fgt't' checr Ho.: 6 3c { s' January 27,2004 Michael Lauterbach PO Box 3451 Vail, CO 81658 RE: Purchase Residence - Proposed New Single Family Residence 1310 GreenhitlCourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision Dear Michael, Town Staff has preliminarily reviewed the application for a new single family residence at 1310 Greenhill Court. Based upon this initial examination, the Department of Community Development has determined that the application is incomplete and can not be reviewed by the Town of Vail until all required items have been submitted. The following additional items and information listed on the accompanying checklist must be submitted. lf you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me directly al (970) 479- 2128. uther nt Review Coordinator of Vail Cbn Ly'on lofrZ Design Review Board ACTION FORM Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2L39 faxi 97 0.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us Project Name: PURCHASE - CHG TO APPROVED Project Description: Pafticipants: OWNER Purchase, John & Lara 754 Potato Patch Drive Vail co 81657 APPLICANT Michael Lauterbach Project Address: Legal DescripUon: Parcel Number: Comments: PO Box 3451 Vail co 81658 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL DRB Number: DR8050315 RELOCATE SOUTH FACING WINDoW; ADD 30 SQ FT GRFA FOR STOMGE OVER GAMGE 07l0r/2005 0710112005 Lot: 17 Block: Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB. 2103-124-0301-5 see conditions Location: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Second By: Votei Conditions: ActionT STAFFAPR Date of Approvah O7 I 15/2005 Cond: 8 (PI-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $20.00 ,r*ffi Ouino, Exterior Alteratils Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 97O.479.2128 fax: 970.479.2452 ureb: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submifting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. beiign review approval tapses unless a building pegnit is issued and conslrudion commences within one year of the approval.p.-.--:7 B o4 - orrl of tlre Request:R-/n..- Lc-tt l Vo Q.'q-!.-: :l: . 11-?-le^:Locafion of the Proposah 'Lot:- 4-Block: PhysicafAddress: (3 /o G Parcel No.:2t o3 ' t "4 - t or- (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning:) Name(s) of owner(s):\L- f----F._LLJ- Mailing Address:7{€. >.ulo )./--L J- Phone; owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant:-q- (- Mailing Address:(,9r/z* Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs n Conceptual Review tr New Constructiontr Addition tr Minor Alterafon (mulU-family/commercial) tr Minor Alteration (single-fam ily/duplex) tr/ Changes to Approved Plans D Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild' $300 tur an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 addiuons & interior conversions)' $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting. window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as' re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: 2A -o O o*r*"., D/2,406 oi\( Jun ?9 o5,1 1:25a l"{ichael Lauterbaoh 9"o "z|*ot: , fi , ,., ,,iur1"4,,&*^ . \ ,, q[-ee'(laPt'da- ) (..-)'aD- " MJL DEVELOPMENT INC. PO BOX 5026 EDWARDS, COLOMDO 81632 oFFlcE (9701 926-4007 FAX (970) 926-4011 MOBILE (97O) 471 -1670 M FMORANDI IM TO: MATT CENNETT TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNtTy DE)ELOqMENT MICHAEL J. LAUTERBACH ,KFROM: DATE: JUNE 28, 2005 RE: PURCHASE RESIDENCE I3I O GREENHILL COURT, PERMIT # BO4-OI I 1 PACES: -:S--INCLUDING COVER Pursuant to our recent framing inspection, the inspector has identified several matters which require attention prior to proceeding with construction on the above referenced residence. To proceed, we need either Design Review Board approval, staff approval, or staff confirmation that additional GRFA is available. First, above the entryway, a storage closet was enclosed below the roofline. The area has a ceiling height of 5' 4" and a floor dimension of 5' x 5' which results in our request for approval of this space and of thirty square feet of additional GRFA. Second, the window on the south side of the kitchen nook which is located above the desk was moved approximately four feet to the east as shown on southeast elevation attachment. We are seeking approvaf for this change. Third, at the lower garage level and with the approval of the additional north garage bay, we have added a window opening on the north elevation as shown on northwest elevation attachment and which is located immediately below the north window in the second floor study. Additionally, we have located a window opening on the east elevation wall as shown on noftheast elevation attachment and immediately (t f- -q"- Jun 29 O5 .1 I : 25a l'lichael Lauterbacho 9?O 926-+011 p." below the east window located in the second floor study. We are seeking approval to install windows of the same size and mullion pattern as the overtread windows in both of these framed openings. As we have been issued a Stop Construction order by the frarning inspector untll these items are approved, I am requesting your assistance with the timely approval or denlal of these items. Please af so let me know if you require further information regarding these items prior to staff or Design Review Board consideration. Thank you in advance for your asslstance with these items. PLEASE INITTAL AND DATE HERE -_---------- AND FAX TO SENDER TO CONFIRM RECEIPT DELIVERY ADDRESS: 854 BEARD CREEK TRAIL, EDWARDS, COLORADO 8I632 P.3Jun 29 O5 11:26a Hichael Lauterbacha 9?O 926_-40I 1 ) fs/l /*/$ lrl(to u ( /Et/ ,/ / /rT ,/ s$ / , rowru oF vAtl' / oElldr.r neVrew/ stnrr APPRovAL \7lr/r , \\ STAFF: Jun 29 O5'1 l:26a H i chae Lauterbach 9?O 926-.+O11 o11 P.5;l I I I I I ts \.- s \ \N h- \t \ h os \ 7 /rt ElEl I I I 6 -.+o9?O 92Jun 29 OS ,11:27a M i cha Lauterbachelo I I l I I *t*t*****++tat*****lt++******++******++++tt*t++t++attf**aaa++*f++**++++*+++++++t+++fa+++++f,+ TOWN OF VAIL, COIORADOCopy Reprinted on 07-01-2005 at ll:46:53 O'l/Ol/2005 Statement * * t + | + + * * * * + + + + + t * * * * * * * +t+'t****++{'+**+*t*tt+|!*+***********t* ******** *+i* * * * * t * t + * * t t + + + + + ++ SCaeemenc Nudber: R050000994 Anount.: $20.00 07/OL/zoosI1 :45 AIvl Payment Metshod: Check Init: L,C Notation: *7620/MIC]HAE,I' I,AIITERBACH/MiIL DEV ' IJ Permit No: DR8050315 Type: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans Parcel No: 2103 - 124 - 0301- 5Site Addrees: 1310 GREENHILL SMILLocation: 1310 Greenhill Court, VaiI, CO Total Feea: 520.00This Palment: $20.00 Total ALL Pmta: $20.00Balance: 50.00***+****lt*+*+f***t****+++*****+++++t*ati*t++***atttt***it***+++*+*+***t*****t**l+*f*++++*+* ACCOI,]NT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Currene Pmt.E DR OO1OOOO3TL22OO DESIGN RE\,ITEW FEES 20.00 I0l,[Nm 5*ffi7*),.,si& Design Review Board ACTION FORM Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970'479'2139 fax: 97O.479'2452 web: www.ci,vail.co'us ProjectName: PURCHASECHANGE DRBNumber: DR8050226 Project Description:- RNAL APPROVAL FOR A CHANGE TO THE APPROVED PI-ANS. MINOR ADJUSTMENTSTO GRFA. Participants: OWNER Purchase, John & Lara 05125/2005 754 Potato Patch Drive Vail co 81657 APPLICANT Michael Lauterbach 0512512005 PO Box 3451 Vail co 81658 proiect Address: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL Locationl 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO Legal Description: Lot: 17 Block Subdivision: GLEN LYoN SUB' Parcel Number: 2103-124-0301-5 Comments: seeconditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action; STAFFAPR Second By;Vote: DateofAPProval:0512612005 Conditionsr Cond: 8 (pLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. C.ond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion' Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paidl $20.00 ,*m#'''*,***Hfu,#- web: www.vailgtov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted unul all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the apprcval. Description of the Request: Location of the Proposalz Lot: 17 ebck:- SuMivision: Physical Address:/g r o (7.-=---, /,;rf Cf . rl.-t parcef No.r 2lo3 t>la3ot{(@ntact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning:7u Name(s) of Owner(s):d,t ,-- {- l-2."- bu--Lu- Mailing Address:).*c br U.'l Phone:t6-3cle Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicanh , 'c-l -.--/e-c- L Mailing Address:)oB "1r- -.--1. E-mail Addrcss: a 6vlo N r\loType of Review and Fee: D Signs n Conceptual Review O New Constructiontr Addition tr Minor Alteration (multFfamily/commercial) $s0 No Fee $6s0 $300 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. Consbuction of a new building or demo/rebuild, An addition where square footage is added to any residental or commercaal building (includes 250 addltions & interior conversions). Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining wallt €tc. Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. Revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. D Minor Alteration (singfe-famfly/duph{ I E/cfra4ges to Approved Plans tr separiiion Request $2s0 $'0 .E2o No Fee For Office Use Only:i# rI,ii-jZE -r" ct ".r *Zl€By: y't,/,-&.1 Meeting Date: Planner: DRBNo.: DR-BOSOZ,z6L- r{- o 5- no.r?o q- oo(3 TO: MATT CENNETT TOWN OF VAIL MTCHAEL J. LAUTERBACH PO BOX 5026 EDWARDS. COLORADO 8I632 oFFfcE (970) 926-4007 FAX (970) 926-401r MOBf LE (970) 471-1670 MEMORANDUM RHGffiiVED APR Z b 21]05 TCV-C0M.DEV. 7gy6 g oot 3 FROM: MICHAELJ. LAUTERB A,, 7(DATE: APRIL 25, 2005 RE: PURCHASE RESIDENCE I3I O GREENHILL COURT BUILDINC PERMIT # BO4-OI I I John and Lara Purchase have asked me to seek approval for the addition of GRFA for the following items on the above referenced residence. Per the enclosed reduced drawings, on page A-1, they would like to separate the elevator foyer from the garage area, on page A-2, they would like to finish the storage space and use it for storage, and, on page A-4, they would like to create and finish some attic space. Thank you in advance for considering their request and please let me know if you require additional information to process their request. oo \>' TOWN OF liA'I DESIGN R[\,/IE\A' STAFF. APi.;-,.jVAL F.\l-3a\ , ris fi _------------.-_ o d I \ Eo o I F E z FI F]lr'l 7'r Q oh >fi =----/-\yl ,-,$ r€*q+\l or ,ir, llDi:l r ;. .,[!1/ 3I'$*$$. \fIHI dt { \- v I.s ba@ iB'igIlq,\I \i"I\ -t- L't Jr I I ..,,| I I t9 tl T I OF VAIL IGN REVIEW F APPROVAL '\ DE s14 rni\'l_ ,e<- tf, --+lfr_ --J IIIF ii3 2Er-+11l\lz },_r_re| ' -'- <-- i --'->'F-i o |II x STog I ti I I I ri"l- I I I I I l\ I I i I I I I I <-t -t e'fl5@ Ir\X *3 _ __-_r 6<- I? --> -"r tE-ih i I -F ****lfl*t**+ttalataaaaa**fafaaa*****+++ftt**t+tt*t+tla+++*+rat++++++++*ttirtfrrrr+a*+++++++* TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Statco€Nrt +ta+ft'}'}aflltltltlat*++**latttaa*****flfffffllaalltafa*'}'l*l*t+*l|ri*l}**ftl**a*al'*itttl+{'+l+++t Statenent Nunber: R0500006?9 Amount: 920.00 OS/25/2OOSOT:32 AIr{ Payment Method: Check InLt: iIS Notsation3 7500/MICIiAEIJ LAUTERBACH Permit No: DR8050225 Type: DRB -Chg to Appr Plan8 Parcel No: 2103 -124 -0301-5SiIe Addreee: 1310 GREENHIIJIJ ET VAILIJocation: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO Total Feeg: $20.00Thie Palment: $20.OO Total ALIJ EmtE: $20.00Balance: $0.00 'ia'}'}fl**aa**l+**+*+ttataa**a**+*+**++tft'tllal*a*tll't'at'}tff'.'3'lt+r+lltt+a*+**+*********+l'l*lli ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Degcription Current Pmts DR 001000031t2200 DEsreN REutstf FEES 20.00