HomeMy WebLinkAboutGLEN LYON LOT 17 LEGAL (2)CASH
on: Lot
DEPOSIT FORMAT
Receiot funds to:
Name: 7,h,,, & L.rt- Purt:A.,s<
Legal
Subdivi
Mai I i n g Add res s]jtOGteallLQztf Add
Develo
Project
lm
DEVELOPER I
THIS AG
among
"Town").
WHER
ncy for
and project number
and
, the s obligated to p
of own to provrs
in the atta ES s) in accordance
in the office of
WHER
Agreement, incl
7 ,Btocf,
jr
n
fi
: fAic'l 'oot3
pletion Dale: dut e, / {, Mr-
GREEMENT
Certificate of
Developer lmprovement
rity or collateral sufficient in the
completion of certain improvements set
the approved plans and specifications
of the f
Dev;lopment Department of the Town of Vail; and
ishes
of the all
to provide collateral to guarantee performance of this
improvements referred to in this Agreement, by means
ent, in th
for the completion of all improvements referred to
default under this Agreement by the Developer.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and agreements,
the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to furnish all equipment and
materials necessary to perform and complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement. The .,
Developer agrees to complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement on or-before the lf; 6
dayof ' It^ne-- 15 ' ,2006. The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlile
manne@inthisAgreement,inaccordancewith;||approvedp|ans
and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of
Vail, and to do all work incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and to
the satisfaction of, the Town Planner, the Town Engineer, the Town Building
Official, or other official from the Town of Vail, as affecled by special districts or
service districts, as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed
complete until approved and accepted as completed by the Community
Development Department and Public Works Department of the Town of Vail.
Flcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash draft_1?1202.doc Page 1 of 5
rees to establish a cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as
e amount ot $ t9,3'7{.0o (125% ot the total costs of the
btta
in tt
. as a condition of a'll a r'rl-
estimated bid(s)) as collateral
Agreement, in the event there is a
2. To secure and guarantee performance of the obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide collateral as follows:
A cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow agent, in the amount of$ 14,JTS;co (125% of the total costs of the attached estimated
bid(s)) as collateral for the completion of all improvements referred to in this
Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth abovel
for another form of security or collateral acceptable to the Jown to .guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein in this Agreement and the performance of
the terms of this Agreement. Such acceptance bV the Tqwn of alternative security or collateral
shall be at the Town's sole discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee tf,ereof, Qe liable or
responsible for any accident, loss."or d*nage happening or occurring to the frork specified in this
Agreement prior to the completidn and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor any
officer or employee thereof, be liable for any perbons or property injured by reason of the nature
of said work, butall of said liabilities shall be and are herebyassumed bythe Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon
any performance by the Developer hereunder, and the Developer shall reimburse the Town for
any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in connection with
investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action. This indemnity
provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer my have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply for and the Tdwn may
authorize a partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category of
improvement after the subject improvement is constructed in compliance with all plans and
specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no condition shall the
dollar amount of the collateral that is being held by the Town be reduced below the dollar amount
necessary to complete all uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement.
6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements
referred to in this Agreement are not constructed in compliance with the approved plans and
specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail or
not accepted by the Town as complete on or before the date set forth in Paragraph '1 of this
Agreement, the Town may, but shall not be required to, draw upon the security referred to in this
Agreement and complete the uncompleted improvements refered to in this Agreement. Pursuant
to Section 12-11-8, Vail Town Code, the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy referred to in this
Agreement may be revoked until all improvements referred to herein are completed by the
Developer or the Town in accordance with this Agreement.
F lcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtafl_1212o2.doc Page 2 of 5
lf the costs of completing the uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement
exceed the dollar amount of the deposit, the excess, together with interest at twelve percent
(12o/o) per annum, shall be a lien againsl the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be
certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be collected in the same manner as delinquent ad
valorem taxes levied against such property. lf the Developer fails or refuses to complete the
improvements refened to in this Agreement, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation
of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations), of the Vail Town Code, and the Developer shall be subject to
penalties pursuant to Section 12-3-10 (Violations: Penalties) and Chapter 1-4 (General Penalty),
of the Vail Town Code.
7. The Developer shall warranty the work and materials of all improvements refened
to in this Agreement located on Town property or within a Town right-of-way, pursuant to Chapter
8-3, of the Vail Town Code, for a period of two years after the Town's acceptance of said
improvements.
8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from time
to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto.
F lcdev\Bif l\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtaft_121202.doc Page 3 of 5
Dated the day and year first above written.
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
SS.
Thp foregoing peveloper lmprovement Agreemcnt vyas ackr;pwledged before me this
dl Day ef !'-\ Ovrc.r'-b.,- , ZOO) by . )$1 4 f LLv'pL dL, 4-
Witness my hand and official seal.
^(
My commission expires A r/Y-'i 2,s(iT
oreement was acknowledoed before me this
bS dy (h-<,a12\-a^^lt? ee'.n, r-ff .
Notary
Planner
Flcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash draft_121202.doc Page 4 of 5
ATTACHED COPIES OF THE ESTIMATED BID(S)
F:\cdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtaft_121202.doc Page 5 of 5
Purchase Development, LLC
PO Box 1391
Vail, CO 81657
John & Lara Purchase
l3l0 Greenhill Ct.
Vail, CO 81657
November2l,2005
RE: Estimate to complete 13l0 Greenhill Ct.
The following is the itemized estimate to complete your house:
Exterior Stone on Stairs $3,500
Exterior Steel Railings $4,000
Re-Vegetation & Tree Planting $2,000
Install Lighting Fixtures $1,000
Install Plumbing Fixhues $1,000
Total $lf ,500
Completion date for all of the above items, allowing for spring snow thaw is Mayl5th,
2006.
Regards,
Owner, PurchaseDevelopment, LLC
General Contractor for l3l0 Gre€nhill Ct. Vail, CO 81657
John & Lara Purchase
1310 Greenhill Ct.
Vail, CO 81657
Mr. Matt Gennett, AICP
TOV Community Development
Vail, CO
November 21,2005
RE: Construction Deoosit/Bond to complete 13l0 Greenhill Ct'
Matl
Enclosed please find the estimate from our General Contractor (Purchase Development,
LLC ) to complete r€maining few items at our house. Also attached is a check payable to
TOV for 125% of this Estimate.
Please call me at 390-9943 if you have any questions and/or when you need to me to sign
any paperwork. Thanks Youk
. D€partmont of Community D€velopment
?5 S. Frontage Road
Vall' CO 81657
R.niptNo.-5ru3
ffiletotheTowNoFvAlL
oor oooo 314111
oor ooDo 3141110
oor oooo 314 1112
oor oooo 3141211
oot oooo 314111'l
3141111
3141111
6or oloo 312 3ooo
oor ooo0 gtz I
-ot\\ \3Lo
.._ /
check# [t f> RecelvedbY:
^ n^^+ Ct^.,
001 000
1 000
115
0511212005
da
zaitQor frli)o a
-O tr
EI
IrT EQA Od Irl FrDCI vl
NO
J
Fo
|'rAFFdE.r, D30dE
d,
o
Fi{o>o
,1
D
tsrv
U
UF
ql
ci
tsr
O
UF
,t
I
i-7
FUoFF,
QO10
vz
BrOriE
F
FI FIzz
EOFE
p
a
c)7
'oFE
q
FFBZ
ooAE
F
a
FI
A
FT
zo
F
:U
zt4
EETo (,rdF trA
D EU()U
A
FI
td
D
FI
o
2
o
i
;
.
ND
E>aI,r E ,{"r, 40
Fro 3
rd
\)
-)
..'r)
<t)
c6
IJ
'.i(,)
o,
(6|-rl
qJ b0'aE.*9
.2->;1^=
:1 v
EFd3
h?
iB .:
oo-q.tr(,)
I c!
P.T G-.il=tBXFr-.i;:ixtr
>tre9- o,
ooEE E:gxi
(,t >.
> F.i
:Y,^
lt,|,X
.9oh,l!r;
C:= .J
.r.r ': !
'! .,
=
', t, 2'J)Z?
F h!
2,6
E.
Fz
'l
?,'i
cri
E
J
U
o
I
=l?l$l
'l
A
z
t,!
?
U
a
F
I
I!-rlF-l1/l
;1-l
::.l,
U-
I
NIO.lo'l-l
E
'r-
€
U
lnl\Cl
El
^l
r'i I
(gl
>l
9l
sl
9l
0l
-l
i)
b.
o
3
€E
C,]l
7l
UI
(,ll
0Jl
UIol(gl
IJI
"l
,ii
cl
o
b.
a
'F!
'i
E
z
65>.9:rc>0J
Fi
Cl -Ji:3
'rl cXrsx=
=u-'aE
lEY
x_b
tl!
"o6Lb
EQ'rt
tc x=
.:v-.
trY-
!reEElx
-s :.9
69X
i(,):.-roO
0., +'' bO
E Y:
:3oo
i:>
(,)t6cJ3ol !'!! lg \+-
;: +r v,Y - ,r,
e
=(JU.>.8.eFi
FUO
>tUz
'{ftp
U
Uo
frlo
FI
H4UHhH
F{
H
Fl
U
ntv{(: Y--)-+ J'/q(
\5
\
\LO
OFra< oo
qJ <.
RP !d+:\
,f\t.t-rS.sR
NS
L
qJ
LJ
t-
o
5
r-(
o
(
q.)U
P
q)v)
u
.h
c!'(/)
oo
\
r5
o
I.or-3t#oo lnspec$:,rl,FeduFs,l n:Forting ge zz
Requested Inspect Date: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Inspeclion Area: GCD
Site Address: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL
1310 Greenhill Court. Vail. CO
A/P/D Information
Activitv:
ConslTyp6:
uwner:
Contractor:
Description:
Cominent:
Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
Tvoe: B-BUILD
Occupahby:
Status: ISSUED
lnso Area: GCD
IC WORKS - LSANDOVAL
AND ROUTED TO GREG DENCKLA - JSUTHER
R-Jr)UlIrLI\
O MATT GENNETT - JSUTHER
chase Develooment is the new contractor. Letter is in file
Requested Time: 08:30 AM' Phone: 390-9943
Entered Bv: DGOLDEN K
Sub Tvoe: NSFRUse: V N
Phone: 390-9943
)NS SUBMITTED"AND ROUTED TO GREG DENCKLA. JSUTHER
GRFA AND ENLARGING DECK OFF MASTER BEDROOM SUBMITTED AND
NCKLA AND MATT GENNETT. ( ADDED $25.OOO VALUATION). JSUTHER
stamped by the architect and thd engineer as ihe property is in 6 High Hazard Debris
MENT LLC
OUT
Time Exp:
TT GENNETT
11
Comment: RE\
Comment: ADI
Comment: Cha
Comment: El
Comment: W
Comment: Rr
Comment: lL
Comment: N
Comment: M
Inspection Historv
Item: 20
ONALrtoao
Comment: MJL has been lerminated as the contractor. Purchase Develooment is the new contractor. Letter i
confirmino this action 8/15/05 - JSUTHER
Comment: DIA and cleck for $14.375 recieved. - LCAMPBELL
Comment: per Matt Gennett's C/O inspection condition. the contractor has removed the dumpster - BGIBSON
Requested Inspection(s)
Item: 540 BLDG-Final C/ORequestor: John Purchase
AssionedTo: JMONDRAGON- Action:
I
Item: 502 PW-Rouqh oradeItem: 503 PW-FinaTdri'vewav oradeItem: 10 BlDG-Footinqs/Ste'e[ ** Aporoved "*
07121104- Insoector: Art Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: APPROVED PARTIAL FOOTING - PORTIONS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS INSPECTION HAVE
BEEN CIRCLED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET 5209/03/04 Insoector: GCD Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: 3 PADS AT NORTH SIDE. BUTTRESS WALL FOOTINGS PER REVISED PLANS.
-09/29105 Inspector: shahn Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Comment: i't0t27t05 |
wall footing.
PARTIAL INSPECTION
{ER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY AND HILITED ON
'lD APPROX 20FT ON NE TO EXISTING
Comment: INSPECTED (2) PARTIAL F.ISPECTED (2) PARTIAL FOOTINGS ON EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY
IELD DRAWINGS. APPROX 25FT ON SW AND APPROX 2OFT ON NE
REPT131 Run Id. 5932
10-24-200O Inspection Request Reporting Page 44
4:30 om Vail- CO'- Citt Of -
Requested lnspect Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Inspeclion Area: GCD
Site Address: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL
1310 Greenhill Court. Vail. CO
A/P/D Information
ActiviW: P05-0010 Tvoe: B-PLMB
Const Tvp6: Occuoahbv:
Ounier: Purchase. John & Lara
Applicant: BEAVER CREEK PLUMBING & HEAT
PIPING
i FROM BEAVER CREEK PLUMBING AND HEATING STATING THEY
O OUTWEST MECHANICAL. LETTER IN FILE. - LCAMPBELL
Sub Tvoe: NSFR Status: ISSUEDU'se: Inso Area: GCD
Phone: 970-471-4850
Phone: 827-5702
Reouested Insoection(sl
Requestedrim:: ilaggily
Entered By: DGOLDEN K
Time Exo:
rk A]d. ba!!t_jlam@] qLlor TCO. 1.) Set all other fixtures or cap dwv.
.L FIXTURES INSTALLED
BATH SHOWER AT WIRE.
IN MASTER ABHT AND POWDER RM.
lnsoection Historv
Item: 210 PLMB-Underqround ** Aooroved **
05/26/05 lnspector: JRM ' Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: 2 TESTS 10 # AIR TESTS APPROVED ' iItem: 220 PLMB-Rouqh/D.W.V. "* Aooroved **
06/01i05 Insoector: cdavis ' Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: 3 qauqes 2 @ 10# airtest 1 (O 8# airtest
Ve'ht slack m-ust be upsized I-o 3" within one foot of roof sheathing ' ,Item: 230 PLMB-RouqhMater ** Aboroved **
06/01/05 Inspector: cdavis ' Action: AP APPROVED
Comment: Twb Tests @ 100#Item: 240 PLMB-Gas Pioino - '* Aooroved **
06/01/05|nEFector:cdaVis..Action:APAPPRoVED
Comment: 2 Gauqes both at 15# airtestItem: 250 PLMB-Pool/Hot Tub"Item: 260 PLMB-Misc.Item: 290 PLMB-Final
11l17lOS Insoector: GCD Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED
Comment: NO HOT WATER NOT ALL FIXTURES INSTALLED
1112'1t05 Insoector: MROYER Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVALComment Foi TCO onlv! Kitchen sink and bath number 1 ok for TCO. 1.) Set all other fixtures or cap dwv.
09/25106 Insoector: GCD Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED
Comment: NOACCESS SEE MO5-0082
09127106 Inspector: GCD Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED
Comment: l.PATCH HOLE lN MASTER BATH SHOWER AT WIRE.
2.CAULK WATER CLOSETS IN MASTER ABHT AND POWDER RM.
REPT].31 Run Ids 5845
1%-31#ou In"p""$:,'l,8?$'a"ltP"ning t" "
Requested lnspect Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006' Inspection Area: GCD
Site Address: 1 310 GREENHILL CT VAIL
'1310 Greenhill Court. Vail. CO
A/P/D lnformation
Activitv: M05-0082 Tvoe: B-MEChConstTvpb: Occuoairbv:Oryrier: Purchase. John & Lara
Applicant: BEAVER CREEK PLUMBING & HEATING
Contractor: OUT WEST
Descriotion: PURCHASE
Cominent: REVISIONS
INC Phone: 827-5702
I, RADIANT HEAT AND SNOW MELT
5 BATH EXHAUST FANS AND 1 DRYER EXHAUST. ADDED VALUATION OF
SubTgoe: NSFR
Phone: 471-4850
Status:
Insp Area:
ISSUED
GCD
Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
EXCHANGE 1 BOILER FOR A LARGER UNIT FOR EXTRA SNOWMELT.
.OO. ROUTED TO JR - JSUTHER
&H releasing the permit to Outwest Mechanical received on &17-06. lt is in the
ANSWER
THAT W 8 FEET.
06/10/05 lnsDector: GCD Action: Pl P
Comment: INSLAB HYDRONICS MAIN ENTRY AND GARA
ON
o6t21to5 Action:
ICS 11 GAGES 100psi
Action: NR NOT READY FOR INSPECTION
INSTRUCTIONS
RANGE
11/18/05
Comment:
09/25l06
Comment:
o9l27to6
Comment:
)RNER.
{TED OUTSIDE.
T WALL WITHIN 8 FEET.
Requested lnspection{s)
Item: 390 MECH-Final
Reouestor: John Purchase
Coniments: will call 389-3342
Assioned To: JMONDMGON- Action:
Mechanical.
DGOLDEN
-lnstall
) has sent a letter relievino Beaver Creek P & H fron the iob and tuminq it over to Outwest
etter is in the file. We are-waiting for the lefter ftom BeaVer Creek P & Fl relinquising the job. -
Requested rim:: lgbllJly
Time Exp: Entered BY: DGOLDEN K
ion only.'OtheFbbileTGnowmelt) not installed at this time.Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
lnsoection Historv
Ve
cei
En
Item: 200 MECH-Rouqh ** Aooroved "
06117109 Insoector: cdavis ' Action: AP APPROVED
_ . .qo_mment: All iluct work complete bath exhaust,dryer vents comb air ducts and flue ventItem: 310 ME^C!-| p^aling ^ -* Approved -"
DTOBE2
REPT131 Run Id: 5845
OI
I0l/'4V
Project Name: PURCHASE CHANGE
Project Description:
Pafticipants:
oo
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel | 970.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
OWNER PURCHASE, JOHN
754 POTATO PATCH DRIVE E.
VAIL
co 81657
License:
APPUCANT LAUTERBACH, MICHAEL
PO BOX 5026
EDWARDS
co 81532
License:
1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL
LoE 17 Block: Subdivision:
210312403015
see conditions
DRB Number: DRB040350
07 /2612004 Phone: 970-926-4007
Location: 1310 GREENHILL CT
GLEN LYON SUB,
Change to approved plans, roof forms (does not impact ridge heights)
07 12612004 Phone: 390-9943
Project Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
ACtiON: STAFFAPR
Date of Approvalz 08/O4|2004.
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities,
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
. and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid:$20.OO
' t,-,i.zp.eaao 9346flr4 OI oo t'..l0.lBE F.1/1
M inor Exterior Alterations
TOI4'NM
Application for Design Review
oepErtment of Communlty oEvelopment
75 Souh FronEge Roa4 Vail, Colorado 8165/
teh 970.479.2139 ftx: 970.479.24s2
Web; Wl'ff.vailgov,cDm
General Infornation:
All proJccts cquirlng @gn r€rleu, must r$lve lpprovlt pdor trt submiturlg a bulfdhg permn appltcaHon. please
refrr t0 S1c submlttdl requlremenE frr fic paficular appfoval that G rEquesEd. An apptlcaton tur Deslgn Revtew
canrlot bc acc0ptcd un0l 8ll required inbfmauon i6 rucelved by the community D6veloprnent Department, The
pncject may also need to be |tsrleild by thc Town Coundt and/o the Planning and Environmentsl Cammi$lon.
DsEign rBvlsw Epprowl lapccs unlcss I buildlng perrnit'rs issued and construction aommcnces within
one year of tfie appruval,
Description of tfre
Locatfon of thePrcporalt t-ott 4 dock:-Subd1,irlon, -6/"a L7 t^
PhysicalAddress: /3lo 6r.-^R,'f C(, *-C+
Prrcef No.: 2/o? l>4 o3 o t {(Contact Eagl€ Co. Assessof at 970-3zB-E640 for parcel no,)
Zoningr
Name(s) of Owne(s):v 6-4-, (- rr, J G-
7fi l\\|*e,-k Pe(*L De
Phone: ( t6- l-!3-
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:tl7,' ec <-,-/ f.c-*.-.6,-.-L
Mailins Addressr PoB go re fu,*-
E-mail Addrees:rax: .-.. i>C =f o IJ-,-R.E4€ IVE D
jijt 13 ,,i,:
Plus $1,00 per square foot of btal 5l9n area,
Fgr construction of a new bulldlng ot demo/rebuild,
For an addltion whem squar€ footage Il added to anY r€sidential or
comm$cirl butlding (includ€s 250 addttions & imerioi converslons).
For mlnor changes b buildings end site lmprovcmentsf sudl as,
rcrconng, painting, wlndgw additions' lEndEcaplng' ftnses and
retaining walls, etc,
For minor dunges to bultdhgE and slte lmprovementi, st ch asl
rerooflng, pahhng, wirido,v addltions, tandscaplnE, fences and
retainlnq walls, ek.
For ruvFions to plans already approvcd by Plannlng shff of the
Deshn Revlei'Board,
A:J,.<( {s/<rb<(
Type of Review and Feel
tr Sions
I Conceptual Revlew
tr Neirv Con*rudonE Addltion
E Hinor AlteraUon
(nulH4amtly/commcrd.t)
! Minor Altarflon
(slnglG-f.mllyi dudex)
-ay' Changos h Apprcved FlarF
tr Separafibn Request.{-- t- z-o
$s0
No Fee
$650
s300
$2s0
$20
$20
No Fce
b7 tl
fl&Jo.t - o(53
of oo
MJL DEVELoPMENT INC.
PO BOX 5026
EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632
OFFICE (970)926-4007
FAX (970) 926-4011
MOBTLE (970) 471-1670
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MAT-[ GENNETT
TOWN OF VArL COMMUNTTY OrthsOprtrsXr
MICHAEL J. LAUTERBACH W
/
JULY 2I.2fiH
LOT I7, GLEN LYON
Enclosed are three sets of revised elevations for the Purchase Residence which is being constructed
on the above referenced lot. The building originally was designed with hipped roofs and the Purchase
family has decided that they would rather haw an alpine look to the roofs. Consequently, the architect has
redesigned these roofs and we are seeking Design Review Board or staffapproval for the roof changes.
Please let me know what is required to obtain approval for the roof modifications. Once they are
approved, I will submit revised structural drawings to the building department. Thank you in advance for
vour assistance with this matter.
PLEASE INITIAL AJ'ID DATf, HERE AND FAX TO SENDER TO CONFIRJU RECEIPT
DELMRY ADDRESS: 854 BEARD CREEK TRAIL, EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632
ot oo
l. * i * * {i * +***'} lr*'r** t'rrt'}l t'}*** * * * I * * * ** * * * *'t*** * * ** *,r. | * * * {. * * ** * * * * *'}** i * * * * ** * r*r,} ** 'l * * * * * * * t* *
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement
* * *:l * * t**** +'l'|** *'|*** r't'lf * t* * * * * * *** * * * r.r.** ** * * * * * ** * * ** t* * i. *'] *r.'r:r. * +'l * 'r'| * *'l*,|* *.1{. * * t* * {. * *'} **
Statsement Nuriber: R040005275 Amount: $20.00 07/26/2OO4O9:55 AIII
Palments Method: Check Init: iIS
Notation: #5?11lMrcHAEr,
IJAUTERBACH
Permit No: DRB040350 !4re: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans
Parcel No3 2103124 03 015
Site Addregg: 1310 GRBENHIIJJ CT VAII,
Location: 1310 GRBENHILL ef
Total Fees: $20.00
Ttrie Payment.: 920.00 Total Ar,r, Pmts: $20.00
Balance: $0.00
** *'t l. t * * *** atl,r** +t|*t|* * * ** * * 'r
rt * * !t * '| * * * * * * t** * * *,* * * * **,1* * * *'a 'l {. ** * * tl ** * ** * * * rr * * * | {.'1.'l 'l * * *,1. 'f * *'r*,t
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descriotion Cunnent Prnts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00
t'
Planning Administrative
Action Form
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.vailqov,com
Project Name: PURCHASE GRFA APPEAL TO PEC
Project Description:
Participants:
OWNER Purchase, John & Lara
754 Potato Patch Drive
Vail
co 81657
License:
APPUCANT CUNNINGHAM. BARRY
Project Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
ADM Number: ADM0.IO001
APPEAL TO THE PEC-THE STAFF DECISION ON GRFA REI-ATED TO THE PURCHASE RESIDENCE.
SPECIFICAI.IY REI-ATING TO TOWN STAFF APPUCATION AND INTERPRETATION OF SEfiON
12-1s-3 (A) (1) (D) RELATTNG TO AREAS EXCLUDED FROM GRFA.
0412712004 Phone:
04127 12004 Phone: 303-947-2749
271 ANEMONE DRIVE
BOULDER
co 80302
License:
1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL Location: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO
Loh 17 Block: SuMivision: GLEN LYON SUB.
210312.t03015
withdrawn by Barry Cunningham
TfWN|/Fl/AN
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Action: WITHDRWN
Date ofApproval:
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the
written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the
appropriate review committee(s).
Planner: Matt Gennett ADM Fee Paid: $100.00
. 94/14/2444 22i29
-a-- -- nPR 2a
44 49549
zoo.t rl,"f"to 9?O?1E03o p.l -t{ur ST
I0l1/N0
APPeals Form
fi€ISnmett of Commurlq Aadop.rait
7t Sor^h tfonL!. R!{O, vrlt. Cobndo 816t
r!1 trc.{79.21Jt br: 970.'rtc !492
wab: rr./v!t-vJhov.c(rn
Geno|al lnlbnrtdton:
ThE brm E cq{ird lbr nll09 sA apFrl ol s slltt, htlgn Aeri<rr 6oard, r Plannlng 'rd.Ewltgn|IcntrlCornmb*rn acifon/Cdsion.
- f onrplcte ftrr'l ond 556r6t;{ |Qtlllemtlts m|It be submmed io n|o
cdnmirnlty DctelsFnart oepcnmenr wltnm t\|rcmY (20) h,vin6s d.yt ot ti€ dliplb{ lcdoryd'cirbn'
A(ton/D.dtbn tdne rDFrl.d: TIE sff dlclsldn on GRIA te{'trd to t}E Pq'{i$lg
so.diollv rebtiolLloTo{|lr $rf?r DDlLttiorr end l|rtrrDr(lllh al scdol\ r 2't5'3(AXt )fdl leli$tab
srlr qduddtmGBFA
orborlcrtn/D.c rlo^, hA\ 2D r ?'ON '
tcato o. $,t tr garron ,witcdr, rctlo,r.ldciion: c^mmuoivl)9ylbp@ll!3lgltsl9Dlr-
Do6lhlr r9Dcal lnvaavo a iFdtlc !E|!GI ot bird? vts
t' F, r|r you rn lt Ert Pm9-1t oHnf' Y€r ndl v{tdrdtndn! f|id c
Its|G qf Atp.i.nt(.): otrY L o'nnhohtm
'tlllln! lddrfr: ln
^dflione
Dth€, Sould€t, CO-!0fq? '.-----
thcoc: l0.l4llzzllL-
Phyrlcal Addtc l.l Vdlt 1119 Grcnhid coud
tqJ Docqlpdoa of A99.n.n(!) praFrtv ln Vrlll,teF2!D-8'o<t:-StDcrvldon:-6led'x00-
regdrrnqt, StlnrruElrlr i ' rzr''-- ----
(Atrch ? lst oa siqnstlrc! lf rEG toace is tquN)'
r.|bml&rl RqulrE|nml3i
1. on e laoata€ stleet ot rPp6ntte strocts of oap'r' pmvlde a dcnail€d cxplansllon ot how lou ete dn
"iggrtercd ot advtG.ly lfffid pe|^sqil''
2. on . !.D6rate rhod of r.prftr@ ,i,-Jo or puott, specfy tlt pT* 1"lt'* of se !Dt'al' Pl"s'
cite spesfir mde l€rlbrE hding |elevancc torhe adlon D€lng apfEiec
3. prdvlde a hst of narnet ond add-*iitotrt t"rts ara pnFtal aooresrcs io vril) of alt oine's c'-' ;;;;r-;;;" iri-;brrd sf tu ;'-pEar ona itt aolain p.ott ** (ihcrud60 o"na*
wtra€ Drm.dl6 rrc regJt4rd t *"-[it i"qo pt"pttty by a t19H'of-v{'y' st'€qfi' ol dh€t
Interv!n1ng barriet)'
n. pr"149 5pm@, tdd.6ro envcDF b 'r'n p''oPe'ty orryner llgEd in (l')'
rrE!6t gJBMtr .I}lls FoRH Atro Au StD ITTA TEQJIREML,j I S rq''i&i'of Jl. ornnmirr ot coxt'lur'nv Der'EltPMcNT''-'ii sann-riot'^6E RoAD' v^IL, @loilooor6sz
t*r.,
l.ulv oodrrtttu/tlurl.rb Plriiltc|o4 orot6 Fol&r\o{s qht{ioltm\Ptc
'o0'!l ' AD^J 2}or^nY!n!tn 'gtrtlr
lt'' do'
Adjacent Property Owners List
Appeal of Town Decision
Glen Lyon Subdivision
Lot l7:
PURCHASE, JOHN LAYTON & LARA JUNE
-JT
754 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL, CO 81657
I-ot 24:.
CUNNINGHAM, BARRY E.
271 ANEMONE DR
BOULDER, CO 80302
Lot24:
HARLAN, HAL P., HUGH P., & DOUG H.
PO BOX 29176
INDIANAPOLIS. IN 46229
Lot l6:
GERSTENBERGER, ALLEN & JANET
5255 BOW MARDR
LITTLETON, CO 80123
Lot 16:
HORN, JEFFREY M. & SALLYHELMS -JT
18 AVONRD
BRONXVILLE. NY IO7O8
Lot23:
HOVEY,NANCYM.
I WOODHOLM LN
MANCHESTER, MA 01944-1057
Int25:
LOHRE. JOHN O. & MARY B.
333 LOGAN ST STE 203
DENIVER, CO 80203
Lot26:
LAZIER, ROBERT BUDDY
386 HANSON RD
VAIL, CO 81657
Tract C and D:
TOWN OF VAIL
C/O FINANCE DEPT
75 S FRONTAGE RD
VAIL. CO 81657
Appeal of a Decision on Gross Residential Floor Area
Related to the Purchase Residence (DRB04-0016)
Supplemental Information - As required by appeal form
Subject Property: Lot17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, 1310 Greenhill Court
Appellant: Barry Cunningham is the appellant. Mr. Cunningham owns the adjoining lot (Lot
248, Glen Lyon Subdivision) to the subject property (Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision). The
appellant is an aggrieved and adversely affected person as his home is located adjacent to the
subject property and relies upon Gross Residential Floor Area regulations to ensure the proper
control of the bulk and mass of residential structures. The Purchase residence as approved will
have an adverse effect on Mr. Cunningham's property, the immediate environment, and the quiet
enjol'rnent of his home to a degree that exceeds the general interest in community good shared by
all persons. Mr. Cunningham has standing to file this appeal and is an aggrieved or adversely
affected person as defined by Section l2-3-3 ofthe Town Code.
Below is the specific decision being appealed:
GRFA/Bulk and Mass
Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) and the Town's Design Guidelines were developed
by the Town to help control bulk and mass of structures along with other tools such as
limitations on site coverage, landscape area, and building height. One element of this
project that Mr. Cunningham noticed when reviewing the applicant's plans was the
extensive area being created under the home. In addition to an enclosed two-car garage
buried under the building, there is approximately another 1,270 sq. ft. of partially
enclosed floor area under the proposed residence. This area of approximately 1 ,270 sq. ft.
was excluded by staff in the calculation of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) for the
Purchase project. This area should have been included in the calculation of GRFA for the
property as the space does not comply with Section 12- I 5-3 .A. I .d. of the Town Code.
The Town has determined that the Purchase property is entitled to approximately 5,470
square feet in GRFA, and (based upon a total of GRFA calculations for individual floors)
that the proposed residence contains 5,034 square feet, exclusive of the partially enclosed
area on the lower level outside of the garage. Specifically, Section 12-15-3.A.1.d. states
that the followine can be excluded from GRFA:
"roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or similar features with no more
than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than twenty-five
percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio,
or similar feature or space, provided the opening is contisuous and.fullv open
from floor to ceiling with an allowance for a railing of up to forty-four inches (44')
in height." (Emphasis added)
The perimeter ofthe open space, measured under the outer border ofthe upper story and
the roof covering the entry area, measures 774 feet, as a result of which there must be a
contiguous opening of 43.5 feet, being 25o/o of the 174 foot perimeter. At no point under
the upper story or the entry roofis there a contiguous opening of 43.5 feet. The longest
opening, under the entry roof and the upper story, is approximately 2l feet. The lower
Ievel of this building with walls on each side (of varying lengths and with intervening
openings) is more characteristic ofa basement than it is a deck, porch, terrace, or patio.
Because of the failure of this partially enclosed area to comply with the standard for
exclusion established by 12-3-3.A.1.d., the partially enclosed area is to be considered
GRFA. When this partially enclosed area is considered as GRFA, as required by the
Code, the proposed structure contains in excess of 6,300 sq. ft., well in excess of the
5,470 square feet of GRFA allowed on this lot.
The area under the building does not satisfy the requirement for exclusion from GRFA
because (a) none of the four openings ts 25o/o of the perimeter of the space and (b) no two
of the openings comprising 25oh of the perimeter are contiguous (even under the more
liberal test applied for multiple family dwellings in l2-3-3.A.2.9.) and fully open from
floor to ceiling. Each non-contiguous opening is separate from another by at least 4.5 feet
of structure. The Town has interpreted that a "series" ofopenings canbe considered to
meet the requirement for a25o/o opening, however, the regulation does not recognize
multiple openings as a single opening and, on the contrary, requires the opening to be
"contiguous." The Purchase residence plans violate this code provision, as there is no
single contiguous opening meeting the 25o/o provision.
Any calculation of GRFA which excludes from GRFA an area partially enclosed on all sides and
not satisfying the test for exclusion from GRFA calculations violates the purpose and intent of
Title 12, Chapter 15, Sections l2-15-l and 12-15-3.
Action Requested of the Planning and Environmental Commission: The appellant requests:
That Planning and Environmental Commission overturn the decision and calculation of the
GRFA for the Purchase Residence, thereby nullifying the Town's approval of the project.
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Gommission of the Town of Vail
will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on May 24,2004,at
2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:
A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, to
allow for the conversion of an existing commercial unit to a residential dwelling unit, located at 500
South Frontage Road West, Unit B-1 11 (The Wren)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.Applicant Michael D. KrohnPlanner: Bill Gibson
An appeal of an administrative interpretation of Section 12-1 5-3(A)(1 Xd), Definition, Calculation, and
Exclusions Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-3(8),
Administrative Action, Vail Town Code, determining that a proposed unenclosed area shall not be
considered (GRFA) in the GRFA calculation forthe Purchase Residence, located at 1310 Greenhill
Court/Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.Appellant Barry E. CunninghamPlanner: Matt Gennett
A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-
7H-7,Yail Town Code, and a request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to
Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of the Lionshead Gore Site Hotel
and the operation on a new private skier club, new lodge dwelling units and conference facilities
and meeting rooms on the first floor or street level floor of a structure, located at 675 Lionshead
Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department upon request).
Applicant: Vail CorporationPlanner: George Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is
invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail
Community Development Department. Please call (970\ 479-2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published May 07, 2OO4,in the Vail Daily.
-G. o
F.\gtI(PE Engineerlng; Irc"..s ql gr{rErtfl}ncDd[al.
SOIL Ar{D FOI'IIDATION II{IE.SIIGAIION
roR
PROPOSEDBESIDET{(E
L{II
':t,
Gr,uY LYON SLEDIVSIIOT{
TOWNOFVAIL
EAGT,E COI'NIY, COI,ORADO
PROJECTNO. OSI'D4
aricrrs[ 22,zoo3
PREFAR@FOR:
MR" JOENLOENE
393 lrleAlrl sT, surrB 26
DEtsltR,, COE{rzlt3
P.O Eox 2t37, sdnrccs, CO 81 53\ (97 0) 926-90l$ Tc[ (90) 9269089 Frx
TABI.EOFCOTTTEtrTIS
E'(FIUTII'EIIUMMARY . ... Z
SC0PEoFSTIJDY .--.---..2
SrrEDESCnIFTTOT{ ........ 2
PROPOSED@NSIRUCnON ...... 3
FIELDINVESTIGATIOI\T ,...3
ST,BSURFACESW,ETCDORqADS'AIES.CONDTNON .... I
FOT'}IDATIONRE@MME}IDAIIONS ...... 4
E(CAVATIONDIFfiq'LIIES . ... . .. J|
SI,AB CONSTRIJSNON .. .. 4
RErArNrNowAr"Is .,...... 5
UNDERDRAII{SYSIEM ... . 5
SIIB@ADINGAiIDDRAITiIATOB ......... . 6
IAWNRRICATION .-...-,.6
LIMTTATIO.I -......7
FIq'RETI
IPCATTONSKETCH .... ..DRAWINGNO.I
STJBSURPACEHTT.ORf.TIONT'GS. ....FIG{'RENO. I
PERIMEf,ERDRAIN. ....,.FIGil'RENO. 2
LKp Fqgin?trrn& Ing.
EXD|CUTII4ESI'DTMARY
Ths proposcd todfule $ould bc luppond eith
cilead@rl $pe erlrd ftotn$ dccigcd ftr a
aUcwable soil bcningpcesuc of3000 psf Tley rhould
costruot tta fronhgs qrtc uofirmte4 sardftoo3
bouldcrs. 8c follddm Rccolnclalrtkn*
scotDoFstruDY
Tlis r€Dat prcaGds thp rcsulb of a 3ubsdce Sbil and Foudmion hrcstig4iqn for a
proposed residocc o be cmsinrctcd oD IJt 17, Glco Lyo Subdivisim' Torro of VaiL Easlc
Coury, C.ol6edo. Thcpurporc of frs subsr&cc soil od foudrim invcttisldm wus b
ttrtcmirc thp cogheriqg chre.Hriic! ofthe fwdaion rcil od io porvide rxornaaaios
for tc foun&fiondesip, gndirgn ed dninap.
SIIEDES'CRIPUON
I.or l7 i! s 0.5448{c$s lot, m Grca Ifll Corg d thc rod df tbe c,ul{o"saq b lbe
*orm ofvail, Erglc Corntyl Colqdo. Th! tpogngFy is noaerrc. Vegadio on tte lot
oonskcd of aspco fqcst, gcattcrcal phcr,, ud ruodrrce undertrusb. Otainage b to &s notth and
nor&nrcst The lot is rataqt
ItrgtEndlna!fiin& IDc.
gor 24.rtr,J Lct-10 atv;'/:oa
3
PROPOSED(:ONSTRUCIION
We rmdrrrteul th* {te pr,oposea reidacc will consi$ d a rno+tory, v*ooil fraoc
cmstrocdon, witl a possitfe ralhoa Uawi, m s mere fr'mdstion l-ocds ue dicipatod
!o h ligbq typical of rqiahtiat constsdim"
If fte finrlkcd phns difrcr sigeifm!ilV &orr tbe abov€ undcrstauding, lhcy slmltl no@
us tortcrnbatc rhe rtcmaddsDc of thfu rqort
EITIJ} II{VESTIGATIOIII
Ttc ficld irvegigation, cod*ed on Augusr l+ Z0fJ3, cosised of, loggitg @d
sampliry ooe t€st pit The tcst pit locaim is $osra on Dewing No. I - Excaatim of tle tcst pit
*rs donrudng alobDeerc 35Zf$, uinitackhoc. Wc $ortbe soilproflc oftbctcstpil oo
thc ffiffroc Bgloraio Log Fi$rcNo f . Soil rrryles fqrlsbcagry soil orb/sis asd
observation rrrs '*ar af sclcctd inewrls.
SIJESI'NFACE SOIL AIiID GNOUNDWATER, (]ONDrIION
Ilc soil erpqeed b the tcst pit cdlistcal of 2 &ct of topsoil orrur 3 feet of ligtr brovm
sandy gmrcl with mgqlc mok frEgn€G .td some ro* orrr oae to 2 feet of houn sady
gr$El rritbsrnd$oocborilalcc. R!6rsal *ar ooeed at7 fecr hrtptcst pit Grouldqnter
ws noteocorl'.odin either te$pit
Rwiew of6e hdcncs to Chological MryDitg; Eagle Comy, Colcrado, prqaccd by
Chssles S. Robirrolad A$ocidcs,IDe., in 1975, shows &dtc soils are sososiva Thpsc soils
osy costain Eiotsts in vtiablc uors$ fu produpc secious &tb€nhl dO * **,
roctrl orqlba stbtbcostat rc inoodfctwihftedoit. T]"ctr ccocctshouklbcuscdiDtF
coocnete iu codrst ri6 q *oil. ekq $ese nrpo strn tl'Er rh€e soils cc susceptible to
sr$sideucc atu. to eolrdoD Tle ur@yiqgb?dlock is ldaroon Fomatim,
LPbeirecrb&Inc"
rOI'NDATION RECOMMEI{DAIIONS
The poposrd rridm smld bc srrypuod wih conrdoal t
"c
spr€ad frodngs,
desigrcd &'r a naxinnn aUqerablc soil beoriag prcssuo of 3000 pd, fhe ftoriqgs, fu tbe cotile
fr@dqdq should be phood mftc udislsbc4 b.drodi
Wc rcoommad nrirnlrnrqr yiffi of 16 fuctcs fot thc coniauous frodngs and 2 ftet fos
lbc isoled foodng paas- conduuous ftrnddm unlls shoulit bo refofurccd bp ud bot@ to
rpm n unsryuted lcogrh d* least l0 ft*
Arnintntru 9;4t inc.hcs otrbocldll covtt ic rccoEncndod &r &ogtfrotcctio of tbc
footirg sub$ils. ne nMg,En agiuer slmdd ob*te tle fouilatiott ffibn to vcr,Ty
tfu thc mil cott&iorlrs ot ug*et tb@nn flrfwdaion llrrrrlatio
Tbe f@ddioncxcsvdia Sould be tcs ft@ qcardimqloils, nost, orgmics od
stadiug wr- Tts m-sib soil alcfioo tpsoil, orgaic* rodmc&ftagnruts sallerth$ dx
hchss' issltiltble bar$Ilnauisl. Void6 kftb&cercsndioo, duebrockrcnovat" shoutitbc
fill.df,,ithlce cqmrec. Ihe frstitrgs shodd bo cormcncrloa alevd surfroe.
ErcavaTloN DITFICTULTES
' Iloo thc coditiu ofris srodop bouldas obscrrcd ia rte tostpit, re ossone that the
edffivztim c8 be dole witL hge excardrn naAigy. kpatrdion of nrrow urility tcnpbcs
'nighbsmorrdifirdf
S"AECOITSTRUCTION
The rffiEl oc€itc sofu, eroftsive of bpgoil otgeotca ce gdiable o grrypoqt lighty
loadedsllbE-gradccognrlion Tbpnrtgredcfctheslab.on-gradccosrustionshouldbe
pmof conpactcil t dctcgt ed r€norrc sofi spot* Ihcy should baold[ o\r€rcxcsyated soft spots
and odprudershD fru with oe on.sib soit tee fion torpsoil ad org[ics, or ofter sritabla
rnahial cmpacterlto 4mir'irnrrrr ef g5 pcrccotoffbcnoriurqsmdqdprroctddilsity
LKP lFngr.eering,Inc.
5
(AsrMD-699). suitable matcrial shouldbe fiecaoa ftpsoil, or8sics anil rock &agneoa
gl€atcrrhn3 iDsh.
The consrcrG d.b Soutd be cocmed ovcr a ,l-iooh layer of clcao grgr GI cocsirfing of -
3/a hch gravel wtlh d lca$ 50% rstabcd q tho No. 4 sian ad tcs tto s pcrccat passiug 6c
No.2(X) gievc.
lloysbubninforoetbooocrao dab-oaradc grd scq? ao&ol joints aaoq'diugo tte
Amcricqn Concet? Iastitre reCdrro[tr aad per tte reonmdciolg ofthc dcstgFer to rc&roe
rl.n'ge due to $ialogc Tbo cmcr,ac slab shsuld be qarucrl fr,on te ftmduio uralls rail
colws with cscpesiou johf O allow ftn indacndcc moveoot wi{hout oaudqg dssEgs
RETAININGWALIS
TLct sboutd dcsignforndationwrlls rctdning cse adretaioing smrcEses tbat rre
laattysuporuAbresi* ocquhnleottrrl dcmill of 60 pcf forn'b-r€st" condition-
I"cralty unrcsrrlncd sfu$frrcgftilEiniagrfu on-sie eatbshotr&lbe deyigd to rcsist an
cqulvalent fluiil ;cosity of 40 prf St tp 'f'rctirrc" casa
The above dcoig rcumnmdalids asslrrc &ained baolfiIl conditiols aad a horiadrl
baffll sutfice. Wge bumns duc toi{hcd $mcftuts, wtidrt ofmpcry slocd
cons&ucdon uatsids and aqfpneC, fuoliaed bar.lfll d by&rostdic prcssrre rhrc to
useained b€o*ffll shouldbeincoaoracdin fto dcsien" lbsysbouldtry!o prEv€dtebdl@
of fudrosulic pessw,e bdind the nninirg walt
'UNDERDRAIIY SYSTEIIT
?eccH\iltE( conditions rro very conoo in fouddirns aonrmred oa bedrock To
rc&rce tp ris} of sdace uloq idludagthe ftundatio ssbaoil (d tbc derdopou of a
pemhcd vanr coaihim) hsallation of a fonnddon pcdretr &ain is recommcodod (see
FiguscNo 2). Tbe fquddionpqtmdrrinshould cfiEist of atl-iu&di;metereoOmedFfuB
sloped o a suitablo gravig oulct, or o e aq prop locarion The drsi! sbotild slope * 1/4 inch
lJUf Fngin€ain&Inc.
o
5
Pcr foot if floriblc * t IE of - t''ot ifrigftt pipc is u!cd, The botbm of the trcor:h a{accot to
&oboting $odd bclioBdwirhapotycfrytonc noisurc buicrgtuod o tc frundstios qrall.
Tho ds"ispiF sbotld bepbedoverlfoimoigrs bcricrqd covrrrcd eiftl rniqirnq ef f,
infrss of -3l4 hch a*ful,rine gsm}o'atcrfut fucx.ilc Gvgn6 l4orl or equirralcc)
shoEld be usd to corm rba tee-draining grEvel to Dse'ut siftdion md dqggiag of thc drsb.
Tbs beldll eborcrhe drahstouldbcerutcmacrialu widrb 2 fterof{h3 gmrudsdccto
gcveot a hril&p of hyeromic ptsuc. Tho rop orc foot of fu ' -d.fill -rr'drl shodd corist
of a rclaively irycndous flL ThB bsrslt *luld slopc crey t@ the bdtdag,
SIIT GRAI'INC AITD DRAINA@
A siu phwrs mt Evailslo fs rwiew clhls tiroc" Tbe folbrriqg reomnpod*ions e
8eo€ral in anre" rhc eib mrotoding rtF building smctue rboukl slqe away a,orn the
builditrS iu dl direaions. A ufufmm ofl2 incler h the fir* l0 fccr it roco@€nitcd ia
uryaEd &as, d the incies in trc 6r$ l0 frst in pcrcd aeas ItE bp of rbc gnrulff
foudAion bectfllSouldtecorEredd&ararqinurrreflfootofrelaivr&irycrvionsAlto
n&cc the poadal of sdaca uabr Atilbltilrg U fguddio s$soik.
Sufice una n*ually &rbing qmil fu gopo*d tuildiry sie c ps,nancm ots,
&orild be dtyruncd round od arr5r fmo ir !y rnr+q of ilnin4o srnles o ortr qprwed
ndbod' Thc $cf,drriDs oi dowospoq should
',rreod
ad disoargc betlDd tte lidts ofte
bockfi[' &iqbrcmtt should tc comparctcrl at crclrr&c optim moisttre oonhtt to at
hast 95% of te macimu staudard pr@r dariv uder pavcolat, sidema* ud prtio ueas
and to at lcart 9015 offre nodnm sryld{d lhooh it"'rci?y tud., t nal*ryed r€as.
Mecboical mrnhods ofcoupactiqrhoulil bc uscd. Do not puddlc thc found*iu ex,cavuion
I.AV/I{IRMGATION
It is notrocommodcd to iddrciqccst c,Ebrro ihe fouDdrtio[ soilsty tsraffing
griukler sFcms noco thc brdilbg; Tlcinsrtraiu ofte spialltcr hcads stould iDcure rbd
fKREngiuesiag; I!p,
&c sprry irom ttE bds rill lor fan ui& I 0 feet of ftuddim wa[s, pq.hps c poio slabs.
Iann n'IiSnrim rnrst bc c@otled.
TIMNATION
This rcpqt hrs Ueco prqceU aceoreing to lelly aaeperf prrftsdonrl Gooechaicat
EngiBeEdag $aDdads ft6 cirrrit'.'rl6ftp{s of tcsi4g aDd tdt aonditims at rtris tima rhse is ao
otbcr w@y dther aryrcssoC oi t-Ftied
. lbfudfugsadrmrhiobofrrrisrqnrtarebaseilofic{rlqlondm,
labcatory tcsdng of s'rn$,tes 66ya"6 aSl$e spocifc locationg Scra o ttc Locaio Sbt.fi,
DrawingNo-l ad m asrynion sHed hfu &"cr soil condriqs a drrlocrions may
rtry' vhi&nayaot bccmc widcd uoil the fuDddion cxcavetion is corylecd. fsoil qr
utstcr coslitiotrssceu di&reatfiom thore dsscribcrlin fri. rqortw shold be coe@d
inned[ate]y to rcctnlude the rrlcomnEoddior of tLic laport
Tbis !*ct hss ba pcpceit ftr [bc csclusinc EsG of rft- roh Loke, forrhe specific
rpplic*ion to ihc poposod rcsidcoce on rot l% Glcn Lpn subdivieio, Tou cf vai! Eagle
Co6y,Colcdo-
\Euwry2002[IfPlGrXpg3 12aru6"r**
Simerely,
Pofiovdn,PE
fl(fnrrgtnccrbg, tnc.
f
(,
#
GREEN
HIIJ.
COURT
NOIE rENHIL06A\O OVPA6'6
6E/@rL
hgineering, Ine.Lfr rr. at ltd l'r'tmrtrn6n
at E a''tr,. aw
N
'aN
Eutmil-
ATO S,4f,,.€ Ltr,,frO,T UEURIUYtEs?Er/trs
-t!
Ugttt bom, eqrdy gnyot n'il,qngtlc smffionc ful€8 od
Btom, gedy g vC ,ith
sdrdatorre boulfus i
Itr@ID:
ll -&aaffiabttr5a4fiI - A*.Snnb
9?_ -,$hrd OqOrt wCpqrc - hbd rhfrtrt Contrrra E)-ZW - AiE r? drt ft. ffi'Siil.tL - LntU tJnnP, - furEUt *rbeU - Ao..n'frV
sttEsqFACG EIPIORArIOIV foe
cow Wr(nL un oE
Fmr oF EAma,ruEntmB g.
tt@ FAxtc(&tn,,nn G'NNNflD
H.*rrE tr$n, dtEDlo lr€ FuruIDt nu,roruEHtstEt & nE
GfiqNO U'A E PffiANT)
&EE EAVA- V1 tcn uAU.
U'H .ES NilN 8 FE
(Do
.r-r{CH UreEn AEffiAID
F}E AEED
'O
A STTAHE %NZET
Ar Lt4- Pn fwr Fn nD&,E ArP
AT uf pn FoorF& nEo rpE
ctllt /ctbsEdlqcAr
Engineering, Ine.lma aE Lfrt g3t'fi,.
lptr F stadt oqr,rt c*etn
Tract C and D:
TOWN OF VAIL
C/O FINANCE DEPT
75 S FRONTAGE RD
VAIL, CO 81657
Attachment: Go)rtt9Fkroa ^P!-.r: a'i:..11 Fr-il.-i!!:--_-{ i!ii;itt: --''!!_:ili:-:r.',i:- _-, ! :::':i-{td rllillt\; -j;[l:i it:':l[;ffi;;;"-*t ;!;| ::;:rtri;;.i ;ii;
ii;::itiaiiq
iiiiiii:i;
:i+:!:ii
$iiiiu:i'ii:i;
;!iiiiili;i!t::i
:l:i
ii;l;li
fii!
i10llr
>o-qFF5!-.E
nf.!!
E 'O 'E
alu o:Fg -.EEF<<
zvJ<ez
.\i
:ii!!it;
Attachment: H
MJL DEvELoPMENT lNc.
PO BOX s026
EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632
oFFICE (970\9264007
FAX (e70) e2640rr
MOBTLE (9701471-1670
MF'MORANIIIIM
VAIL TOWN COUNCU,
IyIICHAEL J. I,AU'I'$RBAC,H
APRIL 15,2OO4
APPDAL OF DESTGN RI'IVIEW BOARD APPROVAL
LOT'I?, GLEN LYON SUBDIVISION
My client, Mr. John Purclrasq who is also the owner of Lot I? at Glen Lyon, has s-sk€d me to
provide ,
-t
riuf ,u*ponsc to Mr, Barry Cunningham's appeal to a Town of Vail Design Rwiew Board
llnnn;* oppror"ifor a siugle family residencc to bc located on the above reftrenced lot. Duriqg the
mccting in wnicn approval was obtaincd, Mr. Cunningtrati'rrequested tbdtthe DRB reqgi-'e tha'u*e iauuse
thc noilr building setUact from fiftecn fcet to thirty-five fbet to altow him a grcater buftr !et111-his
e.xistirrg homc anl Mr, Purchase's proposed single-fsmily rcsidence. After conte'nrplating the DRB's input
as wellas Mr. Cunningham's, we whole heartcdly agreed to provide a side setback of twemry-tlree.fect in
ordcr to partially accommodate Mr. Cunningham as well as loosen the driveway and access circulation on
the lot. tn addition to our twcnty-three foot setback and Mr. Cunningham's fffteen foot building sctbaok,
an aclditional fifteen foot pedestrian easement continues lo separate the two structurcs.
tlnfortunately, Mr. Cunningham is not satisfied. He is rcquesting that you ove,rride the DRB
approval and require Mr. PurcbasJto relocate the residence whicb would allow Mr. Cunningham an
addhional trnelvi feet of setback and btrffcr betwccn rcsidences. On somc lots this r€quc$t miglrt prove
practlcal. Howcver, Mr, Purchase's tot is sloped within thc building envelope at no lesr !tt4 50%'
,
bonsequently, Mr. O:aninghan is requesting that you requirc us to move the resdence further up thc
Sillsidc into - o.uu in whiJh the stopes approaoh 60%, The Town's potential liability ifthe residence were
rCquired tobemovcd onto slope$gr€atefthan 50% seesrs staggering. Needlcontinue?
L havc read Mr. Cunningham"s appeal letter and it oontains little more than support based on flawed
argumenls, a paradox, and perilnal speculation. As to issues one and two, the survey w8s prcparcd by
Attachment: I
TO:
FROM:
DA'l'ltl:
R.E:
Dan Coroorur'r Eagle Vallcy Survey office which mncludsd that the majority if not di of thc tspcru on
rlrc prop".ty *ur.
"Trh*
Jr"as"t, biighted, or dead. Ifis conclusion is confirmcd within a letter addressed
to Mr. purshase from a certified arboiist and tbrester of which a oopy has beear forwarded to the Town's
dwelopment staff. Mr. Cunningham additionatly wants to retain thc trEes located on the wost lot
bounda.y adjar,ent ro lhe only
"uiit"Ut.
cul-du-sac access. If onc assumes that the driveway will be
approximatcly twelve to thuiteen feet wide including shoulders urd the side hill slope is 507o or six to
siven feet which mrst be retained both above and below the asphalt, Evrcn En optimist would 19t e,Q€ct
any of those trecs to be savcd. The forester's later which is refcrenoed above atso confirms this,
Within iszucs three and tbur, Mr. Cunningham paradoxically finds fault with our driveway layout.
On the one lnnd, hc oomplains that our driveway is too long and that we are unneeessarily destroying trees
with a covered parking, arca. He then seerningly concludes that he would be better senrcd if tlrc garage
were locatsd oloscr to the cul-du-sac anA pariO-oxically oloser to his home. Looating thc gange adjacent
to the cul-du-sac would obviously destroythe same stand of trees as well as confine our required guest
parking to the cul-du-sac. Despite Mr. iunningham's skepticism contained in issue fivg the GRFA has
ileen c,ilculatcd and fully compl'ies with the lot allowances while all crawl spaces will bc oonstruct€d to
oomply with Town requirements, Further, we resent the implioation that we are intending to dwiate either
no*oi in the future fiom the approved plans, Lastly, our DRB submittal was oomplcte per the DRB
submittal guidelincs,
Currently, Mr. Purchase has agrecd to incur the sizable cost of additional and elwated retaining
walts which will now be required atong each perimeter of the residence. He has furthcr agreed to an
overatl driveway slopc which has bccn substantially increased fiom the original submittal wlrich rneasured
f ess than 2o/olo a+/o slope for thc first twenty f""i o*oy from the culdu-sac and t}e last thirty ficet in front
of thc garage cloors and a middle portion of 8%. Mr. Cunningham has proposed a ten to_twelve pcrce'nt
treateO-arivcumy slope from the cul-du-sac to the garage doors to support his request, Ho further proposes
that we could lissen that driveway slope ifwe expanded the distance betwecn the anival and cntry floor
levels from the current ten feet belwccn floors to twelve to fourteen feet. He oveilooks thc requirement
thaf additionat floor to floor distance would impaA the conformance of our roof ridge elwations and our
interior floor plan stalr layouts. I must conour that trtt, Cunningham has accurately interpretcd in his first
paragraph that neither thi lot owner nor I am interested in assuming the perhaps substantial additional rtsk
"nd
tsi of moving the residenae further up the increasingty steeper hillsidc in ordcr to allow a further
buffer bctween the two ttsidences.
In summary, aftcr rclocating the residenqe at a substantial etcPeose, Mr. Purchase hrs more than
sati$lied rhe Townis setback requircments and has providcd an ample addilional buffer' Furthet, Mr.
purchasc's construstion financing is in place and he is ready to proceed. A requirement to mow th€
residence further up the hillsidc witl prove unduly expcnsive and will create additional risk for him and thc
Town, I urge you ro reject the appeal. Thank you in advanse for oonsidering my response to Mr-
Cunningham's issucs and plcasc fccl free to cortEct mc if you have any questions or desiro fiirthcr
information.
"",(*rrGennett,
Town of Vail Community f)welopment Deperffirent
John Purchase
Wendell B. Porterfteld. Jr.
Rpr l5 d4 OBTOBT " f; Ftbsvr Fonrrtrrr rho o9?o -.tEg - 4a I I p.1
A Cut Above Forestry, Inc.
aFchilzfng on llr,r s.rvffi ,nd Gilrtuntng
April 1,20Or
*. JohnPr|d|| o75.MPebhI,r.Vt,@ 8r€ft
RE: Ttrc d l3'to Glcailn Cqlrt
Dcailr. Ptrifiac,
ns* yril, Fr conffi? A O|t Affil Fffi F df€lr totlt |n. cf| tG- A yotl
raCud h ourljilldr z0,z(Il.j Ftst di,rtildr, I trpacFd thc8Eil atyour PlopG{Ulsffi i t31O Glurhll Corrt h ttlc Cd Oub atH h \rfl. CdqE b.
IXrir1g orrdn triln you aqrrnd aaso ff UE eS gd rndnt lfigily of thc -Crlm.trc*q||F b|hf qtJdcof lhccrofffirtterE. YGU h|dtpcdJ@ttantbl
tlialr-c|hrs0t-*bdF Erf. Aardl[bqtftlbntt tEtNtlcblt tl
b conoffi ||Dout frtt.r i*re- nrnoifoi enC UorfO re nr lEt. tdo*d nrUr |? lr
O.r kdr gl. 2m{ tqr stltlEltAqr^bF frl*t b prfora r rb hf.ohr b.u|lrb
lE hE|U rtt ot t|E €.ilfE rH !|d lttc poffil fnCU or*udat -flE lt dl^ O|. tfc
t* cr fr milr * ot6 lritt! .itf,ltF You -t|f n nry trub br prr-l| b
youhlffrbrm.
I DgH, dhrct r radrd hrlfE cdiunrfi qorld rt 4,5 frct 6src t !'sttd'
Ot A9|I l. Aa I r* rar lhl5| L.lh.hh, FU diirrlb, b bdl {|] iE tl, rt l tt dlrt|l
fr Uir. tlc prsvftrr, ffirrrilorr prirtrlr6 b l't| lotld fho pb'|rd c.rffirrdn.
ffr plqrru f I dd * hdd Et U.S.FA H b rE lailr r|d dlt dopd Fe.4G.
tre rioni ani r*. th pgp{U tE rdfilt e+.dt16 - u6y lb.prdt|1 dof4 tL6...ftg
4ot3. TIE hb lqbd di! ild of a oosld rc.
trrc drrrotrdofnrrrtilr|n cg|!iludtE. tfixft.l nrt lstr sil rci'ny rld o''
nccdrdy rfiffiG rlt r*. '[', ddls trt tFlEt -fl!'u&f, b rul
irt-ffoina run utnr crru6l rr rE ffi To r3lirrun5drb lt3 *.p rlop.. .n E fuc
lrrinnt d rl b f,ilud ar tr dornlil di din dfvmy.
Lodgf* ts (Pfl|sffi) fl.l Aan (]igd.| trilrburl eir Ftr tn.qh
gru*t qr'sr ita scvre of-l: 4*r rrdid a dyhgt ndy fiun Erg lEr d
emr -th!t -t Dr€ ilEFFA f Uf Fr b.E lEdlt. Erlglr FL ffi .4pg, n titod 66rnfta 1rt-ett1 a iGtti.i Ocrl tsrU liojg ilbcldrd0t mqmrln pite
bede.
So|ilG of t'|3 Sn tuua rldd iopa rrcl a gr,Grd il irtff ffir ofeaporE €nk€r. Of f|€ 14
s'.rrx| D|ET. Art|dglC[r Ftgtil Ct'! rE ItE' rli S{Er- G in|:E.r
lDSi{) :, E atG cd. f nel gn lu tnt | q'lrrt * ra H. 2 il ortupF|rt !5 |rYt F
ird*fft', t E a lH ffirl hr r rt*t *aa bP fi.l 3 (utE tHt ftcftd) ||l
tffidddrE bfrcnh. O|rf hgpodqrton.
PO. tox 213!
Ellckmildgil
970-,f59{1t4
Oounty
Fpr lE Oil O8: Olr , n Fbsvr FoF.ltFU, Ino 9?O-+63-a818 p.E
Gillrry. irr totn* phr tn hc*t noilr C ltn md dF !Ir-h !!r!o-edcpmtg-. iln arLrregt lrr c aprsnnrlt- ai I ncn n tilr, SG# r|' tr . qw!:
rpilll c lO'ii r1d i grga;r J;. eeg*" h drg' rrd+ 6r 1a ffi hdry, fftt
gfoull ldglFb FE tls ln ftt Vbi ele.
Acpor*re b tt .b p54 tr gr* rr br rsd bt s-{bcr.n tE no.t| r&F of ll| .ilt try-
rtri iOer-t sy1;fu ril f-r;e tqrr 3{!t D iO -ftct Elil ot !E groFrq 11.
| flt cfliond rilll l Gba ![ Eldoo ul GqF b ||a lr} E |!|l f OC rlt|l f ilOtH|
uoia fi-[! afie cu'eto'r { .g'6 b ';trr 3 Hotr. g.... Ldg+ob PIf fE
"r-t;E
- blit*E srgmrt dr dl- h ltr wrtd- RrrE'-g 'r tt'y uE x'il .il;;51lr-n*;g16-ffi-tmi tr6n 1tr.pqr gqrilH q 1rgr flmil3 rilrrcrtg EE
Crlil-R.d-zorfi-irina nrr rur ffi rnd-trnn ittl t#riril tr* tdl bm E !!!€t ai
t||tr of rst 6 lol fit|rr h ltgh wlr$-
Thr ffirly tffid L b tlplrl mvgbn tilth A 0F fttlff an an drb d fi. tlr' For
;lirrdr: rfu mrmon r|Eg er trtttttn 5 H ot tF tuttk riD e 12' drnsEr hte Thb E
""|y;-;;d,tr- T ccid.m : flr flEr tn o! *b fr trr. trc orb d-E € rqr b
Incrgased-
stuctrry *rrrg iE ttrs i r Ffftt h ilb ru Hr d llr m'gl* d "ilrsw:rrtlvb thc naoftofa mu*. Si dilrfihe $f ld iUd.|r\ fittullo ttq|j,r0b lry9l' lhr
ffi;fiL-;iltr'Ib gjj 1!| c6.lir n j11c pa r inc r !r Fr gtoFrtt fia ule
n*nEoftho€c.
I n rrv d#.bg offin lhc lxr FlFw fit (l|tf td frl ls rtr||n rtmE fil|lf+- of
i#;fiffi;ffi,dcfiffi;id-Jii snc Jsar*ucrm b ilduc tr *1 dpctsd-hlrr
itaffi Crnra t ro rdr3g5 d;*- rry OrO ryt q' F1 ffi trt 11 s5
;t*a,tg'frtHdlr Inr qr lhcuCrllrG of lb fut|'l-r.E!ttt'
Pbsa sE m rt r|y qrbr t gto{€odt€a-WaLFE*llcffiC.rillrdAtbrBtlRt{196
Effi Fhct0ardbilT
Rrmovc if,excavetioa is cl'os€cb tsGE
Tbrn 5x.
t Gitiort Roct Zf,t! Ttp rrn utdc r lr.. ikl [rry @uffi rs lla
Appeele Form
Dsp tnent of Conmufi Dcvarernant
75 Scrh mrf Rord, tti, Cdorrdo !1657|.l: 970,t79,2ue fu: 970.1t9.2a52
rED: wwrr.vtigov.qr
Grr.|rl lrfr|'|t.ddr!
Itt', 9T b quecd b lllrrp m rppcar or ! st fi, Dcrr$ Rfirew brd, a prannrE and arvnmm.ntrlcomrlsdon aftlory'Hshn, A oomphb fqm and mdat€d r€qlrEmnts musl be e rrmltd b thcorimunity Dardopmert DepNnryicrrt ldsrln tventy (20) budne$ &yr of tnr dlcplJtEd acdalvdeislon
&||o|t/Dccblcn tohg 4prrledl Th€ fEbn Rwiew Eqrrd ffiyd orf DRE0+lDl6. fic furEt'rse
Ecddilce rt 3 adiar urls a llntl do.ovrt of I rfr sird*,frmlly r:dd?nce O rgs: Jotn rrd t ufr
A"6eF. O6.clolrr: Mldrad t tsrbci- Ardrttd: S&ryar ruCgl. _.
Dror ot Acilotr/Dcidol: rrh i rflH
lord or l9ttt D.|an ,tndarlng ecfoo/doddur:O6ion Rei/lerv goJd
Ooo thlr rpgcrl InvolUt. .pccinc Frrd ot bnd? ycr
lf yrr, rrc yo|| l| dFat rroD.rtv orrcr? yg
il||ttgqtAlFlmqo: - Barfl E. o.h4rmham
tlrJq|ddrrr y'\Jlncmore Dd!B, 6ol{td-. CO flI3(n .
FEGd Ad&r- I|t VaI: r3rq Gresnl|lt Ourt
Ptuan 3u3-iA7-DQ -- - -..-
ttil mEbdo|| of AtP|lbrq.) tppiry tn vr_I:fuMMslon: Ghn L'/fll -
AppGl.'|qr) 3i gnrtrr{r)r
(tftad a fin of Cgrrai.rct lf ncr spscr
S|lrdlDlR4rft||nbrl. Or a r€Fr.t! lhEct or segrra0e $eais c, p8prr, F vlde a detitld a@nrtion d luv you .r! .n
'aggriet/rd or ldvtrsly aftcd pcrnn'.
2. On a r.prr!! *rcct or eeparato 4tEb of p!p.r, sFdfy the pr*jsc nrture of th. afcal. PlaDse
cltl lpodAc oodo cdtons havlrE r€ldare bo the rctofl bring appted.
3. Pron& r llst d namca End dre6E€s (bdr miiling lrd phyeril 0ddr€ss6 In vall) of tll otrn€t! of
gtqerty who ,7e t,re subEt of ttre rppcil and al e4ecrfit fDperty Ol.'l€ts (lndudlrB o|rnats
rvhcBe pmp€iler arc sqratcd film fie eubl5 proprty by t rlghtt'*ty, 5tttm, r odrer
httftinlng b!nl6).
4. Prui,lde sbmpcd, rddrssrd ovrbpe for ach goporty *lrs lishd in (3.).
REASE StFiin ftE mRvl AlO NI SIJBi'IFrAL RFQIIREI,E{TS Ttl:
lot ril 0F vA\ DcHf,rItlGt{T oF coMtluNlTv DEVELOPi4R{T,
75 SOUTH FnO rA6E ROAD, vrtr, @LoR^DO 8r6s7.
st5ilLYoitlort? ,rrtt I v
AoDmoMLsErsA{oLopEA}rALysrB
l: fuv- O B rtpffi- R Fytsia
.*gr E,-Elrrfldr -rrrrno *ttfot*t"
FADDlrlot{AL GETBAGK o a, tA, r's ,trolllAsTERwito\rEriEnT o r-0, i6, fr,tllWEF IYAST OOLUilN USa' tr6.t.g ' rrdZ,S , 1-6.s ,
u?qER wEsr coRNER arn . c1rlo, aiai:o. ait!:t ,
ItfET RFE U, 1f.3, '25',- -;S;
DtsrAt{cE BETIvEEN polNTc 60, Jo, 50 , ai.A\TERAGE SLOPE 1215 is% j0% s0.6RfEE lN FLgoR HEtGt{T aO , AO, tO; 6;
fNlTtAr DEFtct? AT UPFER rroor r.EvEl (l) . (O) ' e,6, ,
1O.S;
,
ADg: DRIVEWAYGAIN O' i.g. 'S,Ai b.i'NE?DEFtclT .. (1)' (r.r), e.a, re.el,sLoPeAT UFpER LEIleL so* ao*.'sr*
flqEllorry.oou *tr**tf*t*i cADDInOfiA! 9ETBACK 0 t-. l1t rS,NoRtHEAsrERLyrrrovEtrENT o rb, 16, x,,
9!N!F! oF LOWER COt UUNS S15C' !150. !t@.6, 8111.5'cEilTER oF uppeR LEvEt sroT' !1s1, 819i1.5. srC_s.NEIRIEE 31, gil' gil, ge;
DfSTAI{CE BETWEETi| potHtt er ' 01 , el , ai ,A\GRAOESI€PE t1.c79f 5496 0t* xrRfsE rN Ft.ooRlfErcr.rr 2E-tt, a,at, zsiii. a5t ,
n'rmAl oeHotr^r upp€F rlooR lErEr 6.!S) , (l.g!) , p.Sg) , (10.67) ,
AOO: DRtlrEwAYcAtN o" 'ai, .6.3; . aiiNFr oEFGfr F_.i-1 , F,ar), 6,COl , (5.t .
8IOFEAT UPFER LEVE! '5{)'6 5{f,. Si
AL?ERIA?IVEtErtrrtiltr A E0 6', 12'0 t0, 10.
8158 ' 9155.3, E167.6'8170,5' 9170.5 , !t!.|.5 .
2N.3' 4' 21'.59' 60' Eg I
ag?[ .o,t7% .0.a?*20', a, 20't,t' .5' (1.O'0' {.9, 5.9'e.5' 5.a' 3.!'57t6 57t6 TO 601r
EiarrEt.ErrA?tot
ADDMOilALSETEACK
I{OR|TT{EA9TERLY ilOIGr'ENT
Lc'rlrEn EASTCOLITilN
UPPETT EAET CORIICR
I{ETR|8E
DIST t{CE Emi/EEttl pONTe
AI'ERACESI.OFE
RlsE lttlflInRHHOIrf
NM^t OEFICI' AT UPP€i FLOON LEVET
'ADD:
ORI\TEWAY€AtN
I{E?DEFICIT
SLOPEATI'PFER TEVEL
DBII,EWAYA]IIALYSI8
D|ATA'{CE TO CANA(IE
FlRgf l0FEETAT'l*
TASTOO FEETAT''3
REIAINERATfr
iAICE OAiAOTILMR
t tAll GIME-1TL!
K tt f C v ,v tv t.v6t*,
cAtcvLhf2oal
c
15,
20'
Elgg'
8r&t'zl'
tg'
40.6? 16n'
(3)'
6.0.
2.4'.
to'
0.4
1,2
L
6,C
18' Q'
0.'l 0.41,2 1,2!.t_ tL
'f.9 5.4
n'
td udlsizr vaaz sl 'reLJ gVAL gLV Ae6 : '0N fNOHd 0(Iutnl0f,-"lur I du3 -13fT9=S : l^l08l
FAXTO: MksLafierbaoh
FA)( NIIMBER: 970'925-401 1
FAX FROM: BarrY Crmningham
FA)( NIJMBER: 970'223-5010
I am attaohing a layout with markingS where I thinh you are measuring *West Elev'diOn'"
;MiA-poiot ni*trioa- *a f".t ei"tation" Did I iocate them conectly? Yoru trble
oyr-ttio a.*ti* betwea thc gErago and the living roorr floorjs 20 feet, but thc plans
have elelations at tl60 and tl8l, i.e. 2l f€ct. Which ig corast?
Rclative to your ErstElevation table you show a "deficit at upper floo1lwel" of (3.5) ft',
(4) ft., (4) fi., and (4) ft. DgE:tg neanepggitivc em.ourt instead o:f g deficit? For
exampli i'Existing" has a floorheigtn of 8181 with grormd at 8176.5, i.e' pontive. Per
our telcphone cowprsation if pu really want yoru east deck as close to Erad€ as possible
you could achieve that by mating t}c house as wc discusse4 rryhich would hclp both the
owner and mo. It wordd also tsrd to sbaightm out yorn drivcway/gaagp entran€€.
Rslativc to yow Mid-point Elevation tablg I cannot undcrstaad your dofioits. I ttthk
your'Eristingi' doficit is 2 feet ard column C is a "deficit" of 4,33 fe$. It I am inconect,
plcaec tellnewhy.
Since you are naking d€,sigo ohangss based on your table, pleasc get back to me as $on
as poscible. It is very unfortrmate you could not meet with me yesterday at the propr;rfi,
It really thinls the final site location should bc bascd on bryth pnvacy qnd saving th€ most
na,urc trees not just arbitrarily picking a number lilcc 8 fr. to 9 ft, Having thc house sibd
back in the woods rathcr than crammed in bcsido my bor:se should greatly earhance its
value, 8s r,vas so eloqucndy staFd by the lady on the Design Rcview Board.
rS/g\A^ "3ocutffio}lullduS l3no3s : l^loulEd t^fdgs:zr ,^az sl 'Jevl gral gLV Al5 : 'Ch't fNoHd
GLENLYONLOTl? O
ADOITIONAL SETAACX t SLOPE AMLYSIS
MARCH Z.zO04
ITEIB.EUATIQT
ADDfNONAL SETBAgK
NORTI{EAATERLY MOVEMENT
Lol/TEB WE€T COLUTTIN
IJFFER YVESTCORilER
NETRISE
OISTANCE EETWEEN POINTS
AT/ERAGE 6IOPE
RISE IN FLOORTIEIGHT
DEfICITA? UPFER FUNR tEtGL
$T'PE AT UPPER I€VEL
rqPo${TELEyarErl
ADDITIO}{AL OETAIOK
NORTHEA8TERLY ITOVEIIENT
LqYYER WES' @IUTIN
UFFER YI'EET CORNER
I{ET RI6G
D|Ef TAi{CE EETWEEITI FO I NT8
AV'ER^CEELOPE
RTBE IN FI.OCN HEGI.IT
T'EFICIT AT UPPER FLOOi LEI'€L
SLOPEAT UPFERLET/EL
E$IJELA\rArtOt
ADDIROT{AL EETEAOK
NORNEAgTERLY iTOVET'EfW
LOIIERlirEsT colum{
IJPPER WEST CORNER
T{ETFI6C
DISTANoE EETWEEN POINTS
A\GRAGE 6LOPE
FISE II{ FLOOR IGTGIIT
OEFICfTAY UFFEi FTOOR IIVET
SI.OPEAT IJPPER TEVEL'
ALIERI{ATN|E3
EE$UE A E0 9' 12'0 0' 16'El59' 0t!0' B10i!.t'meo' 8184' ElE7.5'
21 ', 21', 8'60' 50', S0'1nt #% 50t6m' 20' 20'(1)' (4)' (s)'5016 50%- s3%
afErtilATn EsEilaflfro a E0' 12'g' l0'fi50' 0100-5'sleo' 81eS.A'
se'
6t'
52.5 r4,A7' n.m'
(8.33)' , (C.gs)'
54% -5e$
AL'ER'TA?IYE3
0
0
E166'ua?''01 '
61 '
5r-6? *
4.6it'
o.g3)'
50i6
39',6l'
il%
e
15',
e0'
Elfits',
0t86.5'
25'
50'
SOYa
20'
(5)',
It5'
20'
tt61.t '
ale4.5'
33'
Gl'
5at6
8,A7',
(e.33)'
c
15'A''
t16e'
81E3'u'
59',
a0.67 %u'(.)'
EXrsfl|l(r A E0 6' 12'
0 8r lE'E153' 8154-5', 8157.5'
Et7g.5' 9176,6', ElE1.5'23.S' 21' A'50' 5e' 59'40!6 {p,E??i .0.67 %20' N', ?0'(es)' (4)' (0'5?j6 5?t6 TO0sl6
i
o(uulr0f,-"lulldu3 -]Tlofs : t^loulzd Hd8s:zr v@ae sl 'JeA 9V8L gLV Aa6 : 'ON 3NOHd
TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST
(Request form must be given to the Secretary to the Town Manager by 4:00 p.m. Wednesdavs.)
MEETING DATE: April 20. 2004
(Prepare a separate Agenda Request for each agenda item. lf the agenda item will
be discussed at both a Work Session and an Evening Meeting, be certain to check
both boxes in this section and indicate time needed during each meeting.)
WorK Session TIME NEEDED :
Evening Meeting TIME NEEDED: 30 minutes
Site Visit TIME NEEDED : 5 minutes
WILL THERE BE A PRESENTATION ON THIS AGENDA ITEM BY NON-TOV STAFF?
NO.X YES. Specifics:
WILL THE PRESENTATION OF THIS AGENDA ITEM REQUIRE ANY SPECIAL EQUIPMENT, i.e. overhead
projector, etc.?_x_ No.
YES. Specifics:
WILL THERE BE MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET FOR THIS ITEM?
NO.
_x_ YES. lf yes, is the material also for public distribution?x Yes.
No.
ITEM/TOPIG:
Appeal of the March 17, 2004 Design Review Board (DRB) approval with conditions of a proposal to build a
new single family residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon, by the owner of lot 24B, Glen
Lyon, Mr. Barry Cunningham.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Uphold, uphold with conditions, or modify the DRB's approval with conditions of a new single family residence
located at 1310 Greenhill CourVLot 17, Glen Lyon
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
On March 17,2004, the DRB approved with conditions an application, by Mr. John Purchase, to build a new
single family residence on his property, Lot 17 of the Glen Lyon Subdivision. The DRB's condition of approval
was formulated based on the testimony provided by the appellant, Mr. Barry Cunningham, who stated during
the public hearing held on the aforementioned date that the proposed structure would have negative impacts
on the enjoyment of his property due to its proximity to the property line shared by lots 17 and 248. Despite
the fact that Mr. Purchase's original plan had the structure within the required building envelope, the DRB
imposed a condition that calls for the structure to be located 8'-9' back from the original location on-site. The
DRB created and imposed the condition upon the applicant to address the issues raised by the appellant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the DRB's approval with conditions of the proposed new
residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourVlot 17. Glen Lvon.
Matthew R Gennett, Community Development Department
Attachment AtlI|ltllrrF6n\aiAFv.j e\4f!iIiH{}!rIfitI
F
6
di\J:'/
8.t,t=
!- r-r
art
-
lftz
'j
'z
II
6i
aI
!
Ii
.:..K #tttt
('q
o.
fr
R
5
I
i
I
I
i
\:Wl,'ii'3t\i,
'."11l^
) . /("\,i
Ki:
; .-]-ri'--,t-'i.' i..'.' ..,*\.:r' $.,''
S: : :'''\l' -:..,1': 1$:.: *\; .,S :." ;,'"\i.'.\:..;.\ _"i :i: j:5,,,' . . .' .._)
/-=l- .i.::\ i :i : l:.' {.\iiji . .[f *\..^ t[ r ii
., :i.r. ... : :.+'t i\::,li t[
..r. I :, ; :
t lri::1.\i:Nfi\t.i\i iiiitr.Ns\NN
-'.'. '..1).-1.'--'>1') ),rt r.''-
litliiiii i:iE PURC}IASE RESIDENCEliiiiiiti
o Attachment Bo
Jarl
t5I
t-
E\"it;|r'
(.
mt.
ntr
z
!r:l
II
{g
I}
:$
rh
nI
PURCHASE RESIDENCE
LOl' T7. GLSN LYON SUBDTVISION
IFrt+glEFlriiiii\(\iT cIt
6Z
rIit
trtvl
t.
I
z
U)
c
5vl
s
R.l
z
1/
,lt!
I
tl
I
I
I
E
F
tgli
It
I
J
I
I
I
I
il
til
l8
l{
I
o
I
I
\,
I
\
I
ti
lklHlu
I
:l
I
I
I
I
I.l
I'I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
Il,
I
I
I
.l
I
I lrl
IF IFh
HFHJ lJ
i
hhFlspl2FIFFtflc lc
I
lr
li
I
Fl5F lilFt$FldtFtrltt
ilrl
t!It
I
,il,
ilitc!l
rli;
I
l5tfi
F
tf
t{
ia
(.ll
II
rl
c'g
ill
cl:l iliillililillil|fit
PURC}TASE RESIDENCE
LOT 1', OI.EN LYON SUBDIVISTON
vNr. coLoRADO
o
Ittr lst9 ti|;trFlilq lFtir toti ts
lloll
?.,x
r
i
IOI4'NT)
Appeals Form
Attachment: C
RECEIVED
:' t.1l\/!ilt'd
Depaftment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
teli 970.479.7739 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
This form is required for filing an appeal of a Staff, Design Review Board, or Planning and Environmental
Commission action/decision. A complete form and associated requirements must be submitted to the
Community Development Department within twenty (20) business days of the disputed action/decision.
Action/Decision being appealed: The Desiqn Review Board aooroval of DRB04-0016. the Purchase
Residence. This action was a final approval of a new sinole-familv residence. Owners: John and Laura
Purchase, Developer: Michael Lauterbach. Architect: Steven Riden
Date of Action/Decision: March 3. 2004
Board or Staff person rendering action/decision: Desion Review Board
Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land? yes
If yes, are you an adjacent property owner? Yes not withstanding Tract C
Name of Appellant(s): Barrv E. Cunninqham
Mailing Address: 271 Anemone Drive. Boulder. CO 80302
Phonet 3O3-947-2749
Physical Address in Vail:1319 Greenhill Court
Legal DescripUon of Appellant(s) Propefi in Vail: Lot: 248 Block:- Subdivision: Glen Lyon
Appellant(s) Signature(s): Serp .F-.
"... *+.+ocla.( .
(Attach a list of signatures if more space is required).
Submittal Requirements:
1. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, provide a detailed explanation of how you are an
"aggrieved or adversely affected person".
2. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, specifo the precise nature of the appeal. Please
cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appealed.
3. Provide a list of names and addresses (both mailing and physical addresses in Vail) of all owners of
property who are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including owners
whose properties are separated from the subject property by a right-of-way, stream, or other
intervening barrier).
4. Provide stamped, addressed envelopes for each property owner listed in (3.).
PLEASE SUBI4IT THIS FORN4 AND ALL SUBM||TAL REQUIREMENTS TO:
TOWN OF VAIL, DEPARTIYENT OF COMN4UN]TY DEVELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLOMDO 81657.
For Offrce Use Only:
*." *"."r*, j'zz-o\
ptanner: AG Project No.: ?RJ O{' oOt:
oo
,'kcrnA I rrfroIrq^ff-.
Tl"*e'?R- 2-
otffe^/s r"t/ [L,r
Qnit* - )tt'- t/Pl',lihJr"-" - /)Plft'tDnZ-,ffi
Attachment D
Appeal of a Design Review Board Approval
for the Purchase Residence (DRB04-00f 6)
Supplemental Information - As required by appeal form
Subject Property: Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, 1310 Greenhill Court
Appellant: Barry Cunningham is the appellant. Mr. Cunningham owns the adjoining
lot (Lot 24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision) to the subject property (Lot 17, Glen Lyon
Subdivision). The appellant is an aggrieved and adversely affected person as his home is
located adjacent to the subject property and relies upon existing trees (which would be
destroyed by the proposed project) for protection from development on Lot 17. The
Purchase residence as approved will have an adverse effect on Mr. Cunningham's
property, the immediate environment, and the quiet enjoyment of his home to a degree
that exceeds the general interest in community good shared by all persons. Mr.
Cunningham has standing to file this appeal and is an aggrieved or adversely affected
person as defined by Section 12-3-3 ofthe Town Code.
Nature of Appeal: Mr. Purchase, working with Michael Lauterbach and Steven
Riden, has received approval from the Design Review Board for a new single-family
home located at the end of Greenhill Court, in the Glen Lyon Subdivision. This approval
was granted on March 3, 2004. The appellant, Barry Cunningham, owns the home next
door to the Purchase property, at 1310 Greenhill Court. Mr. Cunningham only became
aware of the proposed development of this site a week prior to the March 3,2004
hearing. Mr. Cunningham reviewed the proposed plans and had several conversations
with Michael Lauterbach, the applicant's representative, about making some changes to
the plan that would improve the buffer between the two homes and save a significant
number of trees on the property. Mr. Cunningham also discussed with Michael
Lauterbach about the impacts of the circular driveway on the mature trees on the west
end of the lot. There were some assurances made by Mr. Lauterbach that have not been
reflected in the proposed development plans.
Mr. Cunningham tried to resolve his issues with the Purchase's representative, Michael
Lauterbach, prior to the Design Review Board approval of the project and subsequent to
that approval to avoid filing this appeal. The owner's representatlve was
uncommunicative and could not provide any assurances that the issues raised would be
addressed by the owner. Therefore, this appeal was necessary due to certain deficiencies
in required documentation and errors made by the Design Review Board and/or Town
staff in their approval of the project.
Below is a list ofspecific issues that should have been addressed that were not:
Issue 1: Survey
Section l2-ll-4 Material to be Submitted; Procedure; subsection C, 1, requires a
survey to be submitted, The survey is required to show existing trees or groups of
trees having trunks with diameters of four inches or more at one foot above
natural grade. The survey submitted by the applicant only includes "coniferous"
trees (i.e., Evergreens). There are numerous large Aspen trees on the properlry
with diameters exceeding 4". The Town Code makes no exclusion for Aspen
trees. Therefore the applicant did not provide the required submittal materials and
the Design Review Board should therefore not have taken action on the proposal
until such required information was provided. This insufficiency was brought to
the attention of staff and the Design Review Board (DRB) prior to the approval of
the project on March 3,2004 by Mr. Cunningham to no avail. Without the
identification of the Aspens, it is impossible to evaluate the proposed impacts, or
after construction, the actual impact of the development activity on this important
neighborhood asset.
Issue 2: Trees
There is a cluster of large Aspens located along the lower portion (west side) of
the subject property that were not depicted on the fiee survey. Had those trees
been properly depicted we believe the DRB would have considered these valuable
frees that form a natural buffer between Mr. Cunningham's home and the
proposed home. Section 10 of the Development Standards Handbook states that
the location of structures should be such that it limits the removal of trees and is
responsive to the topography. Additionally, the intent ofthe landscape plan is to
"preserve and enhance the natural landscape character of the area in which it is
located." This section also states "the Design Review Board may designate
allowable limits of construction activity and require physical barriers in order to
preserve significant natural features and vegetation upon a site." The DRB placed
a condition on the approval of this project requiring the applicant to move the
proposed home an additional 8' - 9' away from the west property line. This
number was arrived at arbitrarily and instead should have been based upon the
location of mature trees. Had the DRB based the condition upon the natural
vegetation located on the site it should have required the home be setback an
additional 15' based on the location of mature vegetation instead of 8' -9'.
Setting the home back a total of 30' fiom the west lot line would not have resulted
in significant impacts to the design of the home, retaining walls, or driveway
grade.
Therefore, the DRB erred when approving the project due to the lack of
consideration of the impacts to mafure tre€s on the property that form a natural
buffer to adjacent properties.
Issue 3:Drivewav Lavout
Section 10 of the Development Standards Handbook states that access ways shall
be responsive to the existing topography ofa site. The proposed plan includes an
open-air covered parking area for four cars and an expansive driveway and auto-
court, which creates the need for retaining walls and impacts large stands of
mature trees. The width of the drivervay is inconsistent with the design
guidelines, which require that impacts to topography and trees should be
minimized. A review of other driveways along Greenhill Court reveals that this rs
only home that contains an expansive auto-court and an open-air covered parking
area. Therefore, the proposed driveway, auto-court, and covered parking area are
out ofcharacter for the neighborhood. An adequate driveway can be designed to
reduce impacts to both topography and trees. The DRB erred rvhen approving
this project due to the impacts of the driveway to trees, the impacts to natural
topography, and the necessity for tall retaining walls almost on the lot line to
retain the auto-court.
Issue 4:Driveway Functionality
The owner has designed a home that is elevated on piers and contains a Earuge
buried deep beneath the home. Access to the garage and designated parking
spaces make it nearly impossible for a car to back dorvn the driveway or
turnaround on site and exit the driveway. The Development Standards Handbook
requires that driveways be designed as to allow free and unobstructed access to
and from the site. The plan approved by the DRB does not allow for adequate
vehicular maneuverability. The access to the site can be greatly improved by
rotating the home clock-wise (to the east) to line-up more closely with existing
grades. This rotation would also allow more trees to be preserved on the west
side of the lot, improve access to the garage, and reduce impacts to topography
and the need for extensive retaining walls. The DRB ened in its approval of the
plans as it did not adequately evaluate the garageiparking accessibility.
Issue 5:GRFAiBulk and Mass
Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) and the Town's Design Guidelines were
developed by the Town to help control bulk and mass of structures along with
other tools such as limitations on site coverage, landscape area, and building
height. The first element noticed when reviewing the applicant's plans was the
extensive area being created under the home. In addition to an enclosed two-car
garage buried under the building, there is approximately another 2,000 sq. ft of
open area and areas labeled crawlspace. The other issue noticed was the
additional driveway that approaches the home on the west side. The bulk and
mass of the home had been purposely raised an entire story in order to convert the
lower-level of the home to livable area either illegally or subsequent to the
Town's approval of changes to the GRFA regulations being championed by the
applicant's architect, Steven Riden. Ifone reviews the plans closely, it becomes
apparent that the applicant intends to move the garage to the front of the home in
the future and access that garage from the driveway entering the building from the
west. This would seem to be the most logical place to locate the garage rather
than driving below an elevated building to an enclosed garage space in the rear.
Once the garage is relocated, it then becomes very easy to convert the remaining
2,000 sq. ft. "void space" to livable area.
The DRB and/or the Town staff erred when approving these plans as the plans
violate the purpose and intent of Title 12, Chapter 15, Sections 12-15-l and 12-
15-3. Section 12-15-3,1, d. states that the following can be excluded from
GRFA: "roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or similar features with
no more than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than
twenty-five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch,
terrace, patio, or similar feature or space..." The lower level of this building is
more characteristic ofa basement then it is a deck, porch, terrace, or patio. This
area should have been considered GRFA and, once considered as GRFA, the
proposed structure is approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in excess of the allowable GRFA
for this lot.
Issue 6: Excessive Slopes
Section 12-21-14, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excessive Slopes, Title 12,
Chapter 2l , of the Town Code requires that when a house and driveway are
proposed with average grades in excess of30%0, a soils and foundation
investigation be submitted with a DRB application. This lot has grades in excess
of 30% yet no soils and foundation report were provided to the Town prior to
March 3,2004. Therefore, Town staff and/or the DRB erred in its approval of the
project as no such report was provided by the applicant.
Action Requested of the Town Council: The appellant requests:
l. That Town Council overtum the DRB approval of DRB04-0016 (Purchase
Residence);
2. That the application not be heard by the DRB again until such time as all of the
submittal requirements are complete and accurate and until such time as the
home has been redesigned to meet Town Code with respect to GRFA;
3. That the Town Council find that the lower level of the home is not an area that
can be excluded from the GRFA calculation and therefore the applicant must
redesign the home to comply rvith the definition of GRFA; and
4. That the Town Council direct the DRB to evaluate the impacts to trees on the
west end of the site adjacent toLot24 and that the DRB minimize the impacts to
the stand of mature trees in this area by providing at least a 30'construction fiee
zone (i.e., no buildings or driveways).
Attachment: E
THIS ITEM MAY EFFEGT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing
in accordance with Section 12-3-3, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 6:00 PM in
the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:
ITEM/TOPIG:
An appeal of the Town of Vail Design Review Board approval, with one condition, of a new single
family residence, located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
Appellant: Barry CunninghamPlanner: Matt Gennett
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection
during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request
with 24 hour notification. Please call479-2114
voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
Community Development Department
Published April 5, 2OO4,in the Vail Dai[.
Attachmenh F
Adjacent Property Owners List
Appeal of DRB04-0016
Glen Lyon Subdivision
Lot 17:
PURCHASE, JOHN LAYTON & LARA JTINE
-JT
754 POTATO PATCH DR
VAIL, CO 81657
Lot24:
CUNNINGHAM, BARRY E.
271 ANEMONE DR
BOULDER, CO 80302
Lot24'.
HARLAN, HAL P., HUGH P., & DOUG H.
PO BOX 29176
INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46229
Lot 16:
GERSTENBERGER, ALLEN & JANET
5255 BOW MAR DR
LITTLETON, CO 80123
Lot l6:
HORN, JEFFREY M. & SALLY HELMS -JT
18 AVON RD
BRONXVILLE, NY 10708
Lot23:
HOVEY, NANCY M.
l WOODHOLMLN
MANCHESTER, MA 0I944-1057
Lot25
LOHRE, JOHN O. & MARY B.
333 LOGAN ST STE 203
DENVER, CO 80203
Lot26:
LAZIER, ROBERTBUDDY
386 HANSON RD
VAIL, CO 81657
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Vail Town Council
Department of Community Development
Apnl20,2O04
An Appeal of the March 3,2004 Design Review Board (DRB) approval with
conditions of a proposal to build a new single family residence located at 1310
Greenhill CourVLot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, by the owner of lot 24B, Glen Lyon,
Mr. Barry Cunningham.
Appellant BarryCunningham, representedbyArtAbplanalpPlanner: Matt Gennett
il.
il1.
SUBJECT PROPERW
The subject property is part of Special Development District No. 4 with the underlying zone
district being Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS), the standards of which prevail
in this case, and is located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision. The
appellant owns one-half of a duplex lot and structure located at 1319 Greenhill CourULot
24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision (Attachment H, Vicinity Map).
STANDING OF APPELLANT
The appellant, Barry Cunningham, has standing to file an appeal as the property owner of
Lot24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
BACKGROUND
In 1978, the Glen Lyon Subdivision was platted, thereby creating lots 17 and 24.
In 1996, Mr. Cunningham received a building permit to construct a duplex on Lot 24, Glen
Lyon Subdivision. Subsequent to the original construction, the duplex structure has since
been maxed out on the allowable GRFA.
In March of 2004, Mr. Purchase received Design Review Board (DRB) approval with
conditions to construct a single-fami[ home on lot 17, with the following (one) condition of
approval:
That the applicant revises the design review board plans to depict the relocation of
the house I - 9 feet further back (south) on the lot, prior to application for a building
permit.
The DRB created and imposed this condition of approval to reach a compromise and take
the concems of the appellant into consideration with the conditional approval granted to Mr.
Purchase, and ensure compliance with the Design Guidelines.
REQUIRED ACTION
The Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Design Review Board's approval
tv.
V.
with conditions of Mr. Purchase's design review application to construct a new single-family
residence located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Pursuant to Sub-section 1 2-3-3-C.5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make
findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code:
The Town Council shall on all appeals make speciftc findings of fact based directly
on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support
conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this
title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12) have or have not been met.
NATURE OF THE APPEAL
The appellant, Mr. Barry Cunningham, represented by Art Abplanalp, of Abplanalp Law
Office, PC, is appealing the Design Review Board's decision to unanimously approve with
conditions the proposed Purchase Residence. The appellant has provided written
justification for the appeal. A copy of the appellant's letter (Attachment D) is attached for
reference. Staff began working with the appellant during the last week of February, 2004
approximately one week and a half prior to the March 3,2004, DRB meeting to help him
understand the plans for the proposed Purchase Residence. The following are the
appellant's stated issues of concem, verbatim, and staffs response to each of the
allegations written below each issue:
lssue 7.' Survey
Section 1 2-1 1-4: Mateial to be Submitted; Procedure; subsection C, 1 , requires a suruey to
be submitted. The survey is required to show existing trees or groups of trees having trunks
with diameters of four inches or more at one foot above natural grade. The suruey submifted
by the applicant only includes "coniferous" trees (i.e., Evergreens). There are numerous
large Aspen trees on the propefty with diameters exceeding 4". The Town Code makes no
exclusion for Aspen trees. Therefore the applicant did not provide the required submiftal
materials and the Design Review Board should therefore not have taken action on the
proposal until suchrequiredinformationwasprovided. Thisinsufficiencywasbroughttothe
aftention of staff and the Design Review Board (DRB) prior to the approval of the project on
March 3, 2004 by Mr. Cunningham to no avail. Withoutthe identification of the Aspens, it is
impossible to evaluate the proposed impacts, or after construction, the actual impact of the
development activity on this important neighborhood asseL (Attachment G)
Staffs Response:
The survey submitted with Mr. Purchase's application is dated June 25, 2001 , is stamped
and signed by a licensed Surveyor, and meets the requirements of section 12-114,Yail
Town Code (Attachment G). Staff performed a site visit to the subject property in early
February, 2004, shortly after the application was submitted, and did not notice any
discrepancies between whatwas shown on the survey and the existing vegetation visible on
the site. Further inspection revealed that 6-8 aspen trees are located in and around the
building envelope which do not appear on the survey. Staff did make the concerns of the
appellant clear to the DRB at the pre-meeting for the final review on March 3, 2004, and
made a point to indicate, during the scheduled site visit, the trees not illustrated on the
survey. The DRB acknowledged the aspen trees at issue, and tookthem into consideration
with the condition of approval imposed on the applicant. The DRB also listened to the
testimony of the appellant during the public hearing and made their decision afteruard.
Issue2: Irees
There is a cluster of large Aspens /ocated along the lower portion (west side) of the subject
property that were not depicted on the tree suNey. Had those trees been properly depicted
we believe the DRB would have considered these valuable trees that form a natural buffer
between Mr. Cunningham's home and the proposed home. Secfion 10 of the Development
Standards Handbook states fhat the location of structures should be such that it limits the
removal of trees and is responsive to the topography. Additionally, the intent of the
landscape plan is to "preserue and enhance the natural landscape character of the area in
which it is located." This section a/so sfafes 'the Design Review Board may designate
allowable limits of construction activity and require physical baniers in order to preserve
significant natural features and vegetation upon a site." The DRB placed a condition on the
approval of this project requiring the applicant to move the proposed home an additional 8' -
9' away from the west propefty line. This number was anived at arbitraily and instead
should have been based upon the location of mature trees. Had the DRB based the
condition upon the natural vegetation located on the site it should have required the home
be setback an additional 15' based on the location of mature vegetation instead of 8' -9'.
Seffihg the home back a total of 30' from the west lot line would not have resulted in
significant impacts lo the design of the home, retaining walls, or diveway grade.
Therefore, the DRB erred when approving the project due to the lack of consideration of the
impacts to mature trees on the propefty that form a natural buffer to adjacent properties.
Staffs Response:
The appellant is correct in his assertion that there are approximately 6-8 live aspen trees of a
4" caliper or greater which are not depicted on the survey that are within the proposed
building envelope. As stated in the response to lssue 1, staff did point outthe aspen trees in
question to the DRB during the scheduled site visit and there was some discussion over
whether those trees were more aesthetically valuable than any of the numerous other
mature trees on Lot 17. The subject site covers over half an acre of land (23,731 square
feet) and contains a substantial number of mature trees throughout the property. There are
many more larger trees on the subject property that are being preserved under the current
approval with conditions than if the proposed structure was to be located further up the
hillside. Under Mr. Purchase's current proposal, pursuant to the DRB's condition of
approval, 37 mature trees are being removed. lf Mr. Purchase were to move the house an
additional ten feet up the hillside, to the northwest, approximately the same number of trees
would have to be removed.
lssue 3.' Driveway Layout
Section 10 of the Development Standards Handbook sfates fhaf access ways shall be
responsive to the existing topography of a site. The proposed plan includes an open-air
covered parking area forfourcars and an expansive diveway and auto-court, vvhich creates
the need for retaining walls and impacts large stands of mature trees. The width of the
diveway is inconsistent with the design guidelines, which require that impacts to topography
and trees should be minimized. A review of other driveways along Greenhill Couft reveals
that this is only home that contains an expansive auto-court and an open-air covered
parking area. Therefore, the proposed diveway, auto-court, and covered parking area are
out of character for the neighborhood. An adequate driveway can be designed to reduce
impacts to both topography and trees. The DRB erred when approving this project due to
the impacts of the diveway to trees, the impacts to natural topography, and the necessrty for
tall retaining walls almost on the lot line to retain the auto-court.
Staffs Response:
Upon review by staff and the DRB, the proposed location of the Purchase Residence
seemed to present the least amount of negative impacts, visual and otherwise, to the whole
of Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision. lf the applicant chose to locate his new residence further
up the hillside, the required road cut would create a negative visual impact, in the form of a
scar on the landscape, visible from a substantial distance away. Likewise, a longer driveway
would necessitate the removal of a large number of mature trees on the site and a
considerable amount of natural landscape to be disturlced. Therefore, locating the residence
in as close proximity to Greenhill Court as possible without encroaching into the setbacks
minimizes the impacts on existing topography and trees.
lssue 4: Driveway Functionality
The owner has designed a home that is elevated on piers and contains a garage buried
deep beneath the home. Access to the garage and designated parking spaces make it
nearly impossible for a car to back down the driveway or tumaround on sife and exit the
diveway. The Development Standards Handbook requires that diveways be designed as
to allow free and unobstrucfed access to and from the site. The plan approved by the DRB
doeS not allow for adequate vehicular maneuverability. Ihe access fo the site can be greatly
improved by rotating the home clock-wise (to the east) to line-up more closely with existing
grades. This rotation would also allow more trees to be preserved on the west side of the
lot, improve access to the garage, and reduce impacts to topography and the need for
extensive retaining walls. The DRB ened in its approval of the plans as it did not adequately
ev al u ate th e g arag e/pa rki ng accessib il ity.
Staffs Response:
The DRB reviewed Mr. Purchase's proposal conceptually oh February 18,2004, and again
for a final approval on March 3,2004. During the course of those meetings, the DRB asked
the applicant about the driveway and the maneuverability related to accessing the garage
and were satisfied with the response of the applicant. Also, staff refened both the original
and updated plans to the Town of Vail Public Works Department and did not receive
comments or concerns related to turning radii or maneuverability. When one carefully
scrutinizes the site plan and lower level floor plan (Attachments A & B), it can be discemed
that there is indeed enough room to maneuver vehicles in and out of the garage, parking
area, and driveway. Staff has no reason to question the desirability of the design to the
applicant as it does allow adequate, unobstructed access to and from the site.
lssue 5.' GRFNBUIk and Mass
Gross Resrde ntial Floor Area (GRFA) and the Town's Design Guidelines were developed by
the Town to help control bulk and mass of structures along with other tools sucfi as
limitations on site coverage, landscape area, and building height. The first element noticed
when reviewing the applicant's plans was the extensive area being created underthe home.
ln addition to an enclosed two-cargarage buried underthe building, there is approximately
another 2,000 sq. ft. of open area and areas labeled crawlspace. The other issue noticed
was the additional diveway that approaches the home on the west side. The bulk and mass
of the home had been purposely raised an entire story in order to convert the lower4evd of
the home to livable area either illegally or subsequent to the Town's approval of changes to
the GRFA regulations being championed by the applicant's architect, Steven Riden. lf one
reviewsthe plans closely, it becomes apparentthatthe applicant intendsto movethe garage
to the front of the home in the future and access that garage from the driveway entering the
building from the west Ihls would seem to be the most logical place to locate the garage
rather than driving below an elevated building to an enclosed garage space in the rear.
4
Once the garage is relocated, it then becomes vety easy to conveft the remaining 2,000 sq.
ft. "void space" to livable area.
The DRB and/or the Town staff ened when approving lhese p/ans as the plans violate the
purpose and intent of Title 12, Chapter 1 5, Secflons 1 2-1 5-1 and 1 2-1 5-3. Section 1 2-1 F3,
1, d. sfales that the following can be excluded from GRFA: "roofed or covered deck,
porches, terraces, patios or similarfeatures with no more than three (3) exteriorwalls and a
minimum opening of nof /ess than twenty-five percent (25%) of the lineal peimeter of the
area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space -.." The lower level of this
building is more characteristic of a basement then it is a deck, porch, tenace, or patio. This
area should have been considered GRFA and, once considered as GRFA, the proposed
structure is approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in excess of the allowable GRFA for this lot.
Staffs Response:
Section 12-15-3.1 .d reads as follows:
Roofed or covered deck, porches, tenaces, patios or similarfeatures or spaces with no more
than three (3) exteior walls and a minimum opening of nof /ess than twenty five percent
(25To) of the lineal perimeterof the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, orsimilarfeature
or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully open from floor to ceiling with an
allowance for a railing of up to fofi four inches (44") in height.
The covered area in question is a contiguous space that is fully open from floor to ceiling,
and is open on the perimeterto an extent greaterlhan25o/o, as can be discerned from the
attached site plan, lower level floor plan, and elevations (Attachments A & B). The concerns
of the appellant related to the potential future conversion of the spaces at issue are
understandable but not grounded in fact. Neither staff, nor the DRB, can make claims
based on the possible intentions of an applicant or what may or may not occur in the future.
The crawlspaces in question meet the standards for a crawlspace in that they are drawn,
dimensioned, and labeled as meeting the standards for such spaces.
lssue 6.' Excessiye Slopes
Secfion 1 2-21-1 4, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excesslve S/opes, Title 12, Chapter 21 ,
of the Town Code requires that when a house and diveway are proposed with average
grades rn excess of 30%, a sorTs and foundation investigation be submifted with a DRB
application. This lot has grades rn excess of 30% yet no soils and foundation report were
provided to the Town prior to March 3, 2004. Therefore, Town staff and/orthe DRB erred in
its approval of the project as no such repoft was provided by the applicant.
Staffs Response:
The subject property does have average slopes in excess of 30o/o and the applicant has
provided a site specific geologic investigation stamped by a certified professional geobgrt*.
The requirements sited by the appellant are correct, but these requirements must be met
prior to the submission of a building permit to the Community Development Department.
Additionally, staff has not ascertained that the applicant has met the DRB's condition of
approval, and the final set of plans that is approved must be stamped by a licensed architect
on every sheet. Also, at the time of building permit submittal, the applicant will provide the
soils and foundation investigation, along with the foundation plans, all stamped by a licensed
Professional Engineer.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN CODE
Section 12-3-3: APPEALS :
vt.
C. Appeal Of Planning And Environmental Commission Decisions And Design Review
Board Decisions:
1. Authority: The town council shall have the authorig to hear and decide appeals from any
decision, determination or interpretation by the planning and environmental commission or
the design review board with respect to the provisions of this title and the standards and
procedures hereinafter set forth.
2. Initiation: An appeal may be initiated by an applicant, adjacent property owner, or any
aggrieved or adversely affected person from any order, decision, determination or
interpretation by the planning and environmental commission or the design review board
with respect to this title. 'Aggrieved or adversely affected person" means any person who
will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or furthered by this title. The alleged
adverse interest may be shared in common with other members of the community at
large, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all
persons. The administrator shall determine the standing of an appellant. lf the appellant
objects to the administrator's determination of standing, the town council shall, at a
meeting prior to hearing evidence on the appeal, make a determination as to the standing
of the appellant. lf the town council determines that the appellant does not have standing to
bring an appeal, the appeal shall not be heard and the original action or determination
stands. The town council may also call up a decision of the planning and environmental
commission or the design review board by a majority vote of those council members present.
3. Procedures: A written notice of appeal must be filed with the administrator within
twenty (20) calendar days of the planning and environmental commission's decision or the
design review board's decision becoming final. lf the last day for filing an appeal falls on a
Saturday, Sunday, or a town observed holiday, the last day for filing an appeal shall be
extended to the next business day. Such notice shall be accompanied by the name
and addresses (person's mailing and property's physical) of the appellant, applicant,
property owner, and adjacent property owners (the list of property owners within a
condominium project shall be satisfied by listing the addresses for the managing agent or
the board of directors of the condominium association) as well as specific and articulate
reasons for the appeal on forms provided by the town. The flling of such notice of appeal
requires the planning and environmental commission or the design review board to
forward to the town council at the next regularly scheduled meeting a summary of all
records concerning the subject matter of the appeal and to send written notice to the
appellant, applicant, property owner, and adjacent property owners (notification within a
condominium project shall be satisfied by notifying the managing agent or the board of
directors of the condominium association) at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the
hearing. A hearing shall be scheduled to be heard before the town council on the appeal
within forty (40) calendar days of the appeal being filed. The town council may grant a
continuance to allow the parties additional time to obtain information. The continuance
shall be allowed for a period not to exceed an additional thirty (30) calendar days. Failure
interpretation or determination made by the planning and environmental commission or the
design review board.
4. Effect Of Filing An Appeal: The filing of a notice of appeal shall stay all permit activity
and any proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed unless the administrative
official rendering such decision, determination or interpretation certifies in writing to the
town council and the appellant that a stay poses an imminent peril to life or property, in
which case the appeal shall not stay further permit activity and any proceedings. The
town council shall review such certification and grant or deny a stay of the proceedings.
vn.
Such determination shall be made at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the town
council.
5. Findings: The town council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based
directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support
conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title
have or have not been met.
6. Fee: The town council may set a reasonable fee for filing an appeal to a planning and
environmental commission or design review board decision. The fee will be adopted in a fee
schedule which shall be maintained in the department of community development.
The fee shall be paid at the time the appeal is filed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council upholds the
Design Review Board's approval with conditions of the design review application for the
Purchase residence, located at 1310 Greenhill CourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, in
accordance with Sub-section 12-3-3C.5, VailTown Code, and the following finding:
'That the Design Review Board (DRB) diligently followed the appropriate
regulations and procedures for a design review application in the case of the
proposed Purchase Residence and their findings of fact support conclusions that
the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning
Regulations, have been met as presented in each of staffs responses to the
appellant's stated issues, as listed in Section V, pages 2-5 of this memorandum.'
ATTACHMENTS
A. Reduced Site Plan of Mr. Purchase's proposed residence (revised per condition)
B. Reduced Architectural Floor Plan of the lower level & elevations
C. Appellant's appealform
D. Letter from the Appellant
E. Public Notice
F. List of Notified Properties
G. Reduced Survey
H. Vicinity Mapl. Mr. Purchase's response to Appellant's stated issues (includes arloorist's report)
.l
I,
T BnucuA. Cou.rxs, pH.D.
N^nnlr RBorIG Cri6llT^nrr
P.O. Box23 . 1 1 16 MtMorA DRrvE
SrLr, CoroRADo 81652
PHoNdF^x (970) 87Gs400
bacol@rof.net
John L. Purchase
753 E. Potato patch Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
ENUR0NMENTAL
ExPr.oR noN.
AND MINNG
GEoLocY
March 25,2fiX
*'
#L:Hi:Hrrr
courr, trn rz, cr.EN LyoN
Dear Mr. Purchase:
I have completed my geologic investigation of the above referenced property, located on thelower slopes of vail Mountain east ol west Vail, Eagle county cotoraao. This investigationconsisted of a phpical examination of the site conducied in Auglrst,2(x)3, reviewgrf applicablereference materials, and incorporation of the site developmen't ptan provideflfte extremewestern edge of the sire is included in the moderate debrii flow irazardzo;6; T;#;;]geologrc hazard maps, arthough based on both aeriar photographs and r*";;;;;il;\;;U's' Geo-logical survey (Scott' et al.,2oo2J it appears ajttroujtr tire aebris flow hazard bounilaryessentially corresponds to the west boundary of the properi.
Topographically the building site is located on the lower slopes of vail Mountain below andnorthwest of Eagles Nest, at an average elerration of 8,t20 feet, with existing dwellingsimmediatelywest tr-up! northeast. A mapped intermittentstream has formed an allwial fanwith its apex at 8'200 ft immediately south-southwest of tot 17. According to airphotos thecurrent drainage over the fan has been channeled well west ofthe site.
B*t9"k beleath approximately the eastern two-thirds of l.ot 17 is Minturn Formation (pm),which consists ofmostlygrayto reddish arkosic conglomerate and sandstone, with interlayeredsiltstone and mudstone as well as occasional limestone and dolomite, in beds that dipnortheasterly at 9"just soltheast ofthe property. Surficial deposits which are mapped by Scott,et al', as overlying the Minurn on the *ruri"*ihita, including most if not all of tlre buildingenvelope, consist ofunit Qfy, younger fan allwium and debris-fliw deposits (Holocene and latestPaleocene). These materials are deicribed as '. . . poorly sorted, bouliery to cobbly sand and silt
I Fr,tchas" Re"idence site Dercropment pran Sheet sDr, steven James R.iden, March t5.2004.
2 stott, RB.' Udke DJ., and Grumrald, DJ., 2002, Geologic map of the vail west quadrangle, Eagle county,Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous fieid Studies Map MF_2369, lg p.
PAGE 2
that includes minor lenses of sandy to cobbly gravel and debris-flow deposits'' Most boulders
are less than 3 feet in diameter bui in some in debrisflow deposits are as large as 6 feet'
The moderate debris flow zone boundary is dravrn along a low but distinct ridge at the extreme
east edge of the mapped allwiat fan. this ridge will keep any debris flow-material running over
the fan-to the west of the property, in the cul-desac of and on Greenhill Court itself; as noted
prerriously the current primarychannel of the drainage is well to the west' There is no erridence
ofrecent flow on the eastem edge ofthe fan, where undisturbed vegetation appears to be in the
2* to7*year age range; existi-ng stfuctures in the area vary up to at least 30 years in age'
tlitigatjon of ruih d"bri, flort haiard as may exist can be accomplished by (a) lewing the ridgg
menioned above in place or by incorporating equivalent structures in final drainage design (such
,a*.tur", can range from siriple restoratio-n ojf di.t ttb"n"es to construction of berms or rock
walls, orto construction of foundations sufficienttowittstand and direct potential debris flow);
anO 1Q prerrenting redirection of existing drainage on the eastern part ofthe cul-de-sac by
construction of a driveway either at the eiisting grade of the road or on a sliglrt upgrade into
the lot for that portion that may lie within the mipped hazard. Final grading and landscaping
should be desiened and constructed in such a mannet as to conveywater, including snowmelt,
awry from struchtres, and all new or modified drainage must be coordinated with existing
drainage frcilities.
Alluvial fan deposits such as those that appear to underlie the western third ofthe site can be
subject to hydto.ott paction, and may conAin voids due to differential compaction around
boulders, piping, or both. Considering source rocks forthe debris found in the area oflr,t17'
trydrocompiction is less likely than differential compaction and piping, but in any case soil
testing and excarration examination should be sufficient to identiry and mitigate such hazards
"t *{ be present within foundation design limits. Boulders loosened during excavation for
foundationi and utilities should be stabilized or removed and the resulting voids filled with
compacted material before bacldtling. These materials are generally not conducive to corrosion
o,lrydro"*p"nsion, although routine soil tests can easity establish the absence ofthese hazards,
and are not known to .ont"in significant radioactive minerals in the region, but nevertheless all
inhabited spaces should be designed and constructed to prevent the accumulation ofradon or
other noxious or toxic gases.
To summarize, the site has been mapped at the edge of a moderate debris flow hazard zone, and
in fact the west boundary of the property may be equivalent to the east boundary of the zone-
Available aerial photography and geotogic maps suggest that the western third of the property
is underlain byti e "."i"* eage of the allwial fan associatedwidrthe drainage that presenq 9"
debris flow hazard. Such harardt ". may exist can be mitigated by maintaining the existing ridge
that forms the east edge of the fan, or replacing itwith equivalent stnrctures; final grading and
landscaping designed to conduct site drainage away from structures and into existing drainage
systems; ana soii testing adequate to detect voids resulting from differential compaction or
prping. The debris flow hazard to which the site is exposed is minimal, and excavation,
iolnaiton, grading, and landscaping design and constnrction techniques for such locations are
well-established. With the mitigiting measured recommended the proposed construction will
P^GE 3
not increase the hazard to other property or strucrtures, or to public righa-ofrway, buildings,
roads, streets, easements, utilities, or facilities or other properties of any kind. This report is
intendedto complywithappropriate portions ofTown ofVail Regulations Chapter 12-21-15, and
nothing contained herein should be interpreted as suggesting that the subject property is not
exposed to the mapped hazard, or that other geologic hazards do not exist. tfyou have any
questions, or if I can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Itr,iPoRTAtrNor'rce This report concerns natural processe that are rmpredictable and ln large measure poorly rmderstood. ft
is intended to identift potenthl obsenable hazards within ttrc scope ofwork to which dre subje'ct property is exposed and
to swgest mitigatiDg mea$rcs in compliance with applicable regulations. l,lothing in this report should be construed or
interyrcted as $Egesthg tlrc abeerce of the described hazards, or that tte recornmended mitigations wil pmtect fte sarhiect
proDcty from dE describ€d h,uads rnder all cirsmstances, forcseen or uforeseen. ltothing ilr thb rtport $ould be
co{rsE|nd ot int€tprcted as $rygEsting tlutadditinal uoilentified hazards ere not pr€senc ft must aho be undestood thet
'mitigation" does nG arean eitlrer the elimination of tlre hazard(s) or prerrmtion of tfie consequences ofa hazard errent or
evEnts, only the r€dudion to drc €xtent reasonably pmible of the latter. By accepting thb report all present and s[bseqrnrt
pafties thereto agl€e to indemni& and hold harmless the preparer for any and all damage, dirccg indhect or consequcrtial,
indding personal injury or lc of life, aboe and belond the original cct of thb strdy, caused by or reulting trom any
occunene oftlrc described or other hezld(s[ wftedrer or notsuch damrges may result from faltrre to identi&satd haeard(s)
or ftom failrne on indequacy of pmp€rly engineerd, aonshrcted, and meintained reonrmorded mitigatiorc. The prtparer
of this report cannot and will not be responsible in any wEr or manner whatsoever for the proper engineerftrg, cors,,E:ucti<rn,
andtor rmintenance of recomrnended mitfations, or the inadequacyor failure o'f improperlyengineercd, colrstnrcted, andlo'
maintained recommended mitigations, or mitigations that have been altered in anyraywlntsoorcr ftom thoee recommmded
by the preparcr. This report may be amended or withdrawn wittrout notice at any time prior to receipt of payment ther€for.
ZONE CHECK
Datc:
Ad drcss
Osncr
Architcrt
Lot sirc
Sitc Covcragc
Hcigbt
Sctbacks
,ffi{&rnainils,
_5!t
c<2
'. r-ur 5las _ra rt , > Y I
'lsi@*l6,xas- j>to
'q,1*oy*x!o z i'qii ).
roralG*A lfr.ggfkd . Proposcd Total.i,Ta!=Tztt
Prinrary CRFA _ l q+ZS1 1eZS"1=--.-+
Scrondary GRFA _ + (.125) (675+) =.- - + _
; * 675=425 crcdirplus250addition
Docs rlris rcqucst involvc a250 Addtton? lLb,
-
Horv much of thc allorvcd 250 Addition is uscd Mth Ns rcqucst?o
Existingr
cofi:l
Fron t
Sidcs
Rcar
7)'
a
, ,/r'r, O'Minimum (flzo lo0o( -" ft%
l't 6' :
n.quircA !b b
v"s-Jl No_--
Ycsj- No--
7fz
6'
3
/32
Encloscd
(300) (600)@ (l2oo)
\l
PcrmittcdSlopc 'Q % proposcd Stopc I y,
l) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >30%)
2) Floodptain
3) \v
4) Watcr Coursc Scrback (30) (
5) Gcologic Hazards
a) Snorv Avalanchc
b) Roclfatl _ /- i
,j o.urir ot gk_
Pro'ious conditions of rpprovdl (cbcck propcrty filc);
Is thc propcrty non-conformingi Dacribc:
O o
-t
. t:.,..-(
,t1]r::i';1
,nrp"u toro.rt-t 7-1 .
sJptr18u1urz;r1 u-
(,p)sfueq.rcagp "*, *
.-'i..f alucao3*,t_rt
qrEs,*-ya
n*rolrn-*.s,7
lqsragsurnppt-
?-
Uuoqeogua,rAttqn Vnt(gTV)uodcrcnrr t''./
p,rorddyopuo3
V.7/
,:'j:.j.:#.i
"/NVtdgJI?
.suopcaclclodg T /
,uor.rolltt{ -T-
,_/
::*l s tps?Jr?pH la ururubrraug /;-
,/'
:I.eqlrs csmoJ ," r,*.27y
ueldpoog.:,(961 :Ife uvr Y/A/
fqdafodog F/nutwsa,/7y_
**r,o*tad---
1ilx.
coedg cqlqlarut
,n:.
vfrre puoppp"os{ $ry ,
JJ.rt f
'*/;
,Kuooory,
JSITXJSHJ ATsIAftI NOISSC
'lilcphotrt:
970,47ti.1):10()
970.476.ii50()
1i'lecopirr:
lt t'11.47h.47tt\
l.)mail: planalpGt'vaii.net
Larv Office of
Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr.
L.L.C.
Post Office Box 2800
Vail, Colorado
81658-2800
28 April2004
Phvsical Address:
Suite 30I
!'ail 21 Building
4?2 East Lionshead Circle
\,hil, Colorado
81657
Mr. George Ruther
Mr. Matt Gennett
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
111 South Frontage Road West
Vail CO 81657
Re: Purchase Residence Application,Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Dear George and Matt:
As you are aware, our Firm represents Mr. Barry Cunningham, the owner of Lot
24, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
During the Town Council meeting last Tuesday night, it was our understanding
that Matt indicated that the Town had received a revised landscape plan, based upon
the relocation of the Purchase residence following the conditional approval granted
by the Design Review Board, and that you were in the process of reviewing that
proposal. Since that time, I have been told that no landscaping plan had been
submitted, but that one was anticipated.
Whichever the case, whether a revised landscape plan was or was not submitted
prior to the Council meeting, please advise me (a) whether, at the time of your receipt
of this letter, a revised landscape plan has been submitted, and, if not, whether it has
been or is being required, (b) of the timing of an opporrrrnity to review that plan and
(c) of the Town's action on the proposal.
Additionallg we now understand that a new calculation has been made relating
to the GFRA permitted on the Purchase property. If that is, in fact, the case, we would
appreciate learning of that calculation, including the manner in which it was made and
the total GRIA which the Town has now determined is permitted on the Purchase lot.
Thankyou, once again, again for
Mr. Barry Cunningham
Mr. Matt Mire
xc:
Te lep h ttne:
970.476.0300
970.476.6500
Te Ie cop ie r:
970.476.4765
llmail: planalp@lvail.net
Law Office of
Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr.
L,L.C.
Post Office Box 2800
Vail, Colorado
81658-2800
19 May 2004
Physical Address:
Suite ll01
!'ail 2l Building
472 East Lionshead Circle
lhil, Colorado
81657
Mr. Matt Gennett
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
111 South Frontage Road West
Vail CO 81657
Re: Purchase Residence Application, Lot L7, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Dear Matt:
As you are aware, this Office represents Mr. Barry Cunningham, the owner of
Lot24, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Confirming our recent conversations, you will find under cover of this letter
fully executed counterparts of the Settlement Agreement by which Mr. Cunningham,
Mr. and Mrs. Purchase, and the Town of Vail have resolved the issues related to the
Purchase project in Glen Lyon.
Based upon the terms of this Settlement Agreement, Mr. Cunningham has
authorized me to advise you that he withdraws his appeal of the decisions related to
the Purchase project, and that the hearing scheduled for the 24th of. May, 2004, can
be cancelled.
Thank you, once again, again for your assistance and for your efforts. If you
have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me.
Enclosuresxc: Mr. Barry Cunningham
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement (the "settlement Agreement") is made tne l( day of May,
2OO4,by and between John Lapon Purchase and Laura June Purchase, (collectively,
"Purchase"), Barry Cunningham ("Cunningham") and the Town of Vail, Colorado (the
"Town"):
RECITALS
Whereas, Purchase desires to construct improvements on certain real
properry owned by them and described as Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision,
Town of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado (the "Purchase
Project");
Whereas, Cunningham is the owner of Lot 24B, Glen Lyon Subdivision,
Town of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, which is properry which
will be affected by the Purchase Project, and has filed an appeal with the
Town of Vail related to certain aspects of the Purchase Project; and
Whereas, the Town is responsible for the administration of the land use
regulations of the Town of Vail and has authority, through its staff
approval process, to consent to and approve the clarifications and
comrnitrnents contained in this Settlement Agreement:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom,
the parties agree as follows:
1. Modifications of Purchase Project. Purchase shall take the following
actions in association with the development of the Purchase Project.
Ten (10) spruce trees each having a height of eight (8) feet or greater
and four (4) aspen trees each having a caliper of two (2) to three (3)
inches (measured in conformity Town standards) shall be installed, at
the expense of Purchase, at the location specified by Cunningham within
the area identified as "Forestation Area" on the plat attached as Exhibit
A, which action shall occur before the application by Purchase for a
temporary or permanent Ceftificate of Occupancy forthe residence which
is to be constructed as part of the Purchase Project. Cunningham shall
be notified of the point in time when his identification of the planting
1.
2.
3.
locations is required. The three (3) spruce trees identified on Exhibit A
as "Originally Planned Spruce" shall be installed aPart from the ten
spruce trees referred to'in this sub-section. This allocation of trees
within the Forestation Area shall result in an adjustment in the total
number of trees required for the entire Purchase Project by which there
shall be required a total of thirry (30) spruce trees having a height of
eight feet or greater (a change from twenty (20) such trees) and a total
of thirty (30) aspen trees having a caliper of two (2) to three (3) inches
(a change from forry (40) such trees).
b. There shall be constructed at the location identified as a "New Partial
WaIl" on Exhibits A and B a wall on the north boundary of the parking
area identified on Exhibit A, which wall shall be not more than 44 inches
nor less than 40 inches high and constructed of rock material identical
to other rockwalls on the Purchase residence which is to be constructed
as part of the Purchase Project.
c. The exterior material of the retaining walls identified as "Rock-Faced
Retaining Walls" on Exhibit A shall be constructed of rock material
identical to other rock walls on the Purchase residence which is to be
constructed as part of the Purchase Project.
d. Purchase shall take all action necessary or appropriate with the Town of
Vail Department of Community Development in order to effect the terms
of this Settlement Agreement.
2. Withdrawal of Cunningham Appeal. In association with this Settlement
Agreement, and upon the approval of this Settlement Agreement by all parties and the
Town of Vail, Cunningham shall withdraw his appeal currently pending before the
Town of Vail associated with the Purchase Project.
3. Time. Time is the essence of this Agreement.
4. The Parties acknowled.ge and agree that they
have been represented and advised by independent legal counsel of their own
choosing throughout all negotiations which preceded the execution of this Agreement,
and in connection with their execution of this Agteement.
5. Counterpans: Telecopier Transmittal. This Agreement may be signed in
counterparts. When a counterpart is signed by each party, this Agreement shall be
fully binding upon all parties. Copies of this Agreement, whether produced by
telecopier or otherwise, shall be ofequal evidence as originals.
6. Governing Law. Jurisdiction. Venue. This Agreement shall be construed
and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and each of the
parties hereto hereby agree that proper venue for any action between the parties shall
be in the District Court of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
7 . Notice. Any notice required or desired to be given by any Party to any
other parry shatl be given to all parties by telecopier and by mailing the same to such
parfy to the telecopier number and to the address noted below, and notice so
iransmiaed by telecopier and so mailed shall for all purposes hereof be as effectual
as though served upon such party in person at the time of depositing such notice in
the mail.
If to Purchase:7{+ 6,ft1r* ?,"u*tt '
\/a/J. co 8lG (a
Via Telecopier to:ot+ q
If to Cunningham: Barry Cunningham
271 Anemone Drive
Boulder CO 80302
Via Telecopier to: 303./+40.9509
If to the Town: Town of Vail Department of Community Development
11.1, South Frontage Road West
Vail CO 81.657
Via Telecopier to:
or at such other address as the parry shall specify by notice in writing to the other.
9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes
all prior written oral or implied understandings among them on that subject matter
and the parties acknowledge and agree that there are no representations and
warranties with respect to the transaction contemplated hereby other than as
expressly set fofth herein.
10. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, modified or
supplemented only in writing executed on behalf of all pardes hereto.
11. Binding Effect and Benefits. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit ofthe parties and their respective legal representatives, successors
and assigns, provided that nothing heiein is intended to confer on any Person other
than the parties hereto or, their respective successors and assigns, any rights or
obligations.
12. Section and Other Headings. The sections and other headings contained
in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not effect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
13. No Assignment. No party hereto shall assigp in whole or, in part, this
Agreement or its respective right and obligations, without the expressed prior written
consent of the other party.
74. Waiver. Remedies. No waiver of any breach of any provision of this
Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any or subsequent breach and the failure of
a parry to enforce at any time any provisions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of
any right of any such party to subsequently enforce such provision or any other
provision hereof.
15. Severabiliqv. IntheeventErnyprovision oranyportion ofthisAgteement
shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable under applicable law the remainder of
this Agreement shall remain valid and enforceable, if the purpose and intent of the
parties can be preserved in the absence of such provision.
16. Authority to Execute Agreement. The persons executing this Agreement
on behalf of the parties hereto represent that they have full and lawful authority to do
so.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands as of the first day above
Barry Cunningham
Town of Vail:#v'
Lara June pu"cn.s"
-
John Lavton Purchase
Tirle:
ooll
O(r.rl ra56
a?
trd
ootl
f rll99oo
a\ a\trd
ootlr-I|orD\aa \,t
f)o \Fro \
Jr|o
6lrlE
F
.{c
..n
(
o
I
Irt
6
3oF
o\
-o
rO
6
3I
oo
oiE\Too
6..5FEI
b-'
\-is
6
I
gttt-tr
E
ootl-ot\t g)65
66FO "ed.o
I-o
$a
t'lo
1',
t/J/-t<
-o
Io
6F
,"o;
o
Ic
rO6
?
F
oI
s
rO
il
^..4
,,tq
6C7?(r-Clfi
U
F
U
v_
li-:? /99oo
56FOCicf ru6rrrF
,*r. lN\;*"\.')X)^)c
NS,:>e';)i--Jr' < -+'4rr.\
\ -r\ \\ ,-V.
rY. t \\ '*t'\'r\ '\ Y
trN$
$\\
\Y'-'t)
s
A (t CCn
FROI4 :
l{'Irv-200{ ll r17
o
r^t oFF
FAX NO.
"91A2235ALA
ICE PH0llE t70-178'0100 0701r!17!l
O"r. L4 26a4 a1:1sPM P1
T.0?7 P.009/000 F-0E7
lrqr-AIPLNALP
. SETIISMEIVTAGREEIIMNT
ltls Agreeuert (tltc "settlemert AgneeDGBt') ts made the lLtil dfiJ of l{ay,
2A04'W and benrcq JohB layor Purclrese and lrura June Pruclure (co[ecdy€ly,
'{Purdraset, Barry Ctnnlagbam ("Cunntn8han") and thc Town of vat[ Golorado (the
'efotu["):
NECITAIS
l. VllXcfcta, Purthase derires to coratnrct lmprovements on certaln real
prqPcfty ottaGd byttreo and descrlbed as Lot l7,GIm Llon SubdMrtono
Town of vall, Corrnty of Eagle, State of Colorado (the "Purdlase
Project");
2, Vllhereas, Cuntrtngham ls tlre owner of lpt 248, Glen Lyon $ubdivlshn,
Towrr ofVail, Counvof Eagle, State of Colorado, whteh is prupertywhlch
will be affectad bythe Purchase Prqfect, md has ffled an appeal wlrlr the
Tovm of Vrll related to certaln aspec$ of tLe Purchase hoJecq and
3. lllhetrar, the Toum is recponslble for the adEiniotration of the hnd use
reguladoas of the Town of Vatl and har authorlty, tbrough lte staff
approval prECetS, to conseBt to aadiapprove the clariffcadons aud
cc6blhe$ts connlned |n this Settlerneqt Agreeuent:
TBRMS AND CONDTIIONS
Now, ttrcrcfore, to conefieradou of the ruutual benefle to be dedrnd herefron,
the pardec Bgrtee as follorre:
1. Modlficattqff gf ltrqhase Proiect. Purcbgse Bhall tal@ the fullowfng
actlonn lu asrodadon wlth tbe derdopment of the purc:hase pmJect.
a. Ten (10) gPilce treeg each havlng a helght of eight (8) feet or gnat&r
and four (4) acpen treed .a'h baving a calipcr dr arvo (a) to three (s)
lnchec (measured ll conbrmity town erandards) shall ue tnstanc,-ai
tlr. .rpuryu of Purchare, at the locatioa rpecified by cunntnslutn wftfutn
thp areaidentlf,ed re cForcetadonArea" onrhe ptitattactJO as ExhlffiA, uthich ecdon elrrll occur beforc the app[earlon by purchare for ateilPoraly or perruanmt Cerdff cetc of Ocflpancy for tte tnsldence whlchir to be conetructed 8s pan ofthe purchari nroJect. Cqnnrnghanr ehall
be notlied of the ltnr tn time wheu hts ideatlficadon ordie prand$g
1
N L,L'
Q).
FROI :
tt{ry-2001 1l r{7
O"r. 1.4 2aa4 a1 :lsPM Pz
trq.AlPllllllP T-U17 P.00f/000 F'9W
locadonr te reEdrcd. the tlree (3) spruce bees ideffified on E*hlbh e
ar "Orlglnnlly Planned Spnrce' ehall be lnstaUcd apart ftoo th€ teu
spruce tt?€o tcfctled to in thts sub'secdoa. Thts allocadon of treee
withln the Forectadon Area rhall reault ln an adfualment la the rotal
aunbcr of trees requircd for the eadre Purchare Pmject by wflch there
ehall be fGquired a tobl of thirty (go) spruce trcee having a henglt of
etg[t feet or $e$er (a ciange ftom numty (20) such trees) and a total
of thlrty (30) aopenrrees having a caliper of two (2) to three (3) lnctres
(a du.oge from 6orry (40) cucb tsces).
b. rherc rlrall be cou$ructed at the locarioo identlfied aa a ,,Ngw pafiat
Wdl" on Exhlbltr A oDd E a wall on the uorth boundary of the psrldng
alcaldendfied on E:rhibitA whlchwall slrell be notuorethan4f inches
nor.less ftnn 4o lnchee b$h and consruced of rock uratettal tdentical
to otlrer rock rualle oa the Purchsfe recldcnce whtdr is to be constructed
as psft of ttre Purclaec hoJect.
c, The ffirioE Eatcrtal of tlre roaining walls ldentlfled as "Rock Faced
Retafning Watls' on Exhlbtt A shell De constnrcted of rock naterial
tdendcal to otbar rodc wallr on tlre Purchase reeldeoce whlch le to be
constnrced as pan of the Pure.hase koJect.
d. Pulchase chall talce dl acdon necessary or appropriate rvirh the Town of
Vatl DePatbeut of Gommulrtty Develo;ment ln order to effect tbe terms
of thin Senlcment Agrc€nent.
2. Wtthdrqwal of Cunullluham Auocat ln assodation with this Se'ttlement
A$eeuetr! en4 upon the appmval of thle Settlenent Atrcemenr by dl partlcs and the
Tontn of vatl' Ctnnlnghan shall wlttdraw hls appeal omemly pendtng beforc tbe
Toum of Vatl astodiled wtth tbe purcb$e project.
3, fine. TlmelctheesscuceofthisAgrceureut.
4. Representatiorrby Counsel The Pardes adrnotrdedge and agee that they
hrw becu reprcsented and advlred hy indepmdent legsl counsel of rlreir own
choorlngrhroughoutallnegodadonswhle.hprecedeetheercecutionofthtrAgreemgg
and in connoctloawith their exceuti,oa of this Agre€ncnr.
5. Counternarts: rdscopter Ttaqtmlttql. fhis Agteement may be slgned In
couDterparts. Wtrefl s counreqran ls dgned by each prury, rhl! Agreegrent shall be
o
IAI OFF
FAX NO. t97A2235ALA
rcE PHollE 170-178-0100 l70al01r8E
i
{r,t't'
FROM :
l1'hY'3001 I I r17
o
tAt ofF
FAX NO. |9?A235ALA
ICE PHotlE l?0'1IE El00 170110176!
O"r. 1.4 2aa4 a1:1sPM P3
1-0r? P.00!/!08 F-c57
firlty blndto,g uPoa 8ll pafilet. Coptes of rhir Agrcemeot -
wbether produced bv
telecoplcr oiorhemttsg sbsllbe of eqpal etidence ar orlgiuale.
6. Golerntqt law. Judrdlction. V6uc. Thit Ag8cemeBt shall be conttt'ued
and eoforced tn accordance wlth the lerue of 6e Sti[e of Colorado and each of the
pantee hereto hereby agree 6at proper venue for any action between tbe par$ee slull
be in the Dlsttlct Gourt of the Gounty of Eagle $rate of Colorado.
7. Notlce. Any nodce requlrred or desfued to be gilrcn by any pafiy to ooy
onher pany shall be 3ivea to alt pardee by telecopier and by mailittg tbe same to such
pa$y to tlre telecoplec number aad to tbe addregs noted below, md nodce so
randntttcd brytcleco'ptcr and *o matled ghall fur all purposes hereof be as cffequal
rr tbough eeryed upor euch patty h pemon at the tlme of deporithg suclr notlcp ln
the nall.
Fru-AlPLlllA!P
If to Purclure:
Via Tclacopler to:
Iftocunatnghau' l;flff:]ffm
Bqulder CO 80302
Vla Tdecopler to: S03.44O.9SO9
If to tbe Tovm: Town of VaiI Depesgneil of cfinnuntty Derelopnenr
111 South Frourge Road Wesl
Vril co 8l6sz
Vlr Telempier to:
or at nrch o'tbcr addr.o
"s
t .ffiGiiii@by nodee ln rvrlriug to the ose1.
_ L Entlre AgreenGTt. ltris Apeeuelt consritut€r ttc antlre sgFe€msrfi
between rbe parrteo h€rsto wtdr rcrpect m the su\fecr manel bercof and eu}ereeries
all pdor written oral or laptled undcretandtngc aioog them on rtrat ouDleit ,od*
and firc pardcs aclnor{edgE- and agree tuat rhcre-are no reprerendHoru aoawrrtrndce wlth rcspect to the urniag{on comcuplatcd h6iby other &an aselprcocly sct forth hetdn,
- 10. 4m€ndm€nq, Itrls egeeolent nay be amende4 modified orsupplcncoted only la roriting execwed ou belralf o! alr partrcs hereto.
$ .,'
t'
FROM :
lt
'5'.1001
llr17 trrABPLrttALP
o
TAfl OTF
FAX N0. |9?A2235ALA
/
lG Pl0llE e70-17s's100 e701l6r70!
O.r. 1.4 2aa4 a1 :16P14 P4
T-0?? P.000/000 F-067
11. Blndlnc Effectand Benefltc, thte Agreuneat ehall be blndlry upon'and
tnuremtbebenelltofthepardecandtbdrreapecfvelegnkepreeeatativerr rucceetors
ard acdgE , Ptroelded that nothtng hcreh le inhded ro confer otr .tty percon other
tbar tle padec her€@ or, thelr rnrpecdve successot and acsiSog, any rEhts or
obllgadms.
12. Secdon and otherHeadln$. lteeecdonr and otherhcadlnge contalned
iu rhts Agreemcnt are for rcfefence purpoles only anrl ehall not effect thc meaoing or
lruetpretadon of thl" Ags€emmt.
13. No Anslgnrnent No party hereto sball asrlgn in whole or, In part, ghir
Agreement ortE rcapec$lerigLtand obllgadoas, wldrouttlre erpreered priorutittcq
consettt of the,othcr parry.
14. Watrrcr. Rcnedies. No r,rnirrcr of any brcach of aly provlclon of thic
Aglrs€rncut shall be hdd to be a wairur of any or subcequent breach aad the failurc of
apartyto cnforce ataDytirle anyprorddong hereof shall not be deemcd awaivef of
aily rlgbt of a4r cuch psrty m rubaequeotly enforce s.ch provicloo or any orber
ptwlrlon bsrcd,
15. Seltlrabtlt, gy. Iu tlre evelt any provlslon or anyrpordon oftlric AgreemEnt
s!'41be hdd ltrvalld, lllcgal or urrecrforcea6le rrnder appllcable law tJre rernsitder of
thls Agrrenenr shalt rendn valld ud enftrceable, r ihe purpocc and tntenl of tlre
parrtee cao be prreeerrcd tn fbe abs€stc€ of aucb provEtoa.
. _ 16,, 4uthorlf,rlo E'<ecurcArreenent Tlrepersons exeordngtlrie A$osmeu
61lahalf 6rf thepardee hcreto reprereottnatAeyhive fult andlawfiil authfrtyto do
ro.
IN Vl/tINEllS $EIEREOF the patdca barrc set thcir haqds fls of rtrc flrcr day above
Boted.
Tswa of VaiI:
Iltle:
tflErruGn
FROM :
l1thFl00{ ll :{0
YT
t$
il$
FFX N0. '|97@2235ALA
tffi|ltPLAiALP Lli 0fFlCE PlilflE t70-4f8-8500 370{7!4708
a\!. 74 2A64 ?J,.1,6PY P5
T-l?l P.00Il008 t-t57q$
tr
IBaa
Ff;
t?
$lr
FI r
*
Ii
\
t
T
F
l'\
ET
p\f;
t\
B
r -
\$+;r\
,;\ /
$
E
t
E
t ,q
f
\
tt
Its
g$
I
T
$
F*,hBrq *
A
t
F
Of,Gfrtt
N\)r)tfv+..t {;\r,t\#,..'x
$rf ,Y'3'>'\i;\;iz-{iq,,.r
r\ -\-vk-N
N3q^,)
\Lt'J i
K),.tr,\-V
q)*){..
s
l'A\t
-t;,-\
E; :(
3te
eTF E!
t(,,
oLAf ottll{lry-?00{ llr4lFRON :Il ,'',,.,,'Frsm-lBPllltlLP FRX N0. t97A2235AtAlc PltillE ll0-4r0-5t00 9I04t0(76!av. 1,4 2AA4 AL:I?PM P6T-0a7 F.000/000 F-cl7
t
A
*r IIr.r
fru - q C.
l-
*+*:|'***:r**l'l't*****'t*,t******,t'a***********td.*,r*i********'i******,t***t ********:it ,t't ******{r*r}***tr*
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
* * +***'|r. * *l *****r * * * t**'r * ** 'r'r * t* * * ** a** * * ** 'r {. * * ** * r.*,} it rt **:} t*r' ** f:t * ** *,t 't 'rr
* ** * * *** * *'* ** ******
Statement. Nurnber: R0400053?? Anount: $550.00 Ot/26/2OO4O4247 PM
Palment Method: Check Init: dIS
Notation:
Permit No: DR8040015 I:G)e: DRB - New Construction
Parcel No: 2103124 03 015
Sit.e Addresg: 1310 GREENI{ILL CT \rAIL
Locatsion: 1310 creenhill Court, VaiI, CO
Total Fees: S650. OO
This Payment I $550.00 ToEal ALL Pmts: $650.00
Balance: $0. OO
* *:t'r. f* rt*** * * *'|i * * ** ***** ***'t* *'t*** * * * * ** * f *tr.* * * *** * * * * * ** * * {( * * * {( i.,f * i +i.rrrr* *'* * ** *:l:} ** 't:l'l '|
* t 'i {. +
ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI,{ FEES 6s0.00
Buildino Materials
PROPOSED MATERIALS
TYpe of Material
C'rt Q,rc-l 5(.-r
C..1-. 36--k-s
/r8 1.1*- l4o
Sfortu
Color
A " S+"-4
N a-*u r*l
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
EKerior Lighting
Other
fl.,r,J
2l t!t A..A
b.,rtr..4rr---f f/<,.-
S/.,'*-'(
.b--k 4r.--n
2f C C-- 1,-r JcrAc-r hct-+ i(-is
).fik^-,L.-.- c /.-,(lnrk G.--c
J.4.. fucv-+ {l.ir,
6 -lnr^r\--.P !r-,t*J Ft.-+ Bf.rk
4a, l,'-.--! l( lu.-q----8..*^
3f,^ -/htrt R,tk
t{ rt
6(4tr"hT:j AT-r
(t-rl 1a*.t) 1 P-l-t4-l>5.- (-* { Leafs
Notes:
Please specify the manufacturels name, the color name and number and attach a color chip.
Page 6 of L2lO2lO7l02
LrC C - !.-.
'r.tft ^, 1-, I {r,'zara.
.-7 g C to c.-{* c.'/ Stl..'a;
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
EXISTING TREES
TO 8E REMOVED
Botanical Name Common Name
4.- 5/.--,-
Size
6'
,.t"Asf-^ . f.o
OuantiW
7o
l.4t-p.b 4l--
.*ftllel*t
?7 f\,j c
Minimum Requirements for Landscaping :
GROUND COVER
soD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL
Deciduous Trees - 2" C-aliper
Coniferous Trees - 6' tn height
Shrubs - 5 Gal.
Square Footaoe
(. rf7
Tvpe
ft-ft-- Cret,to..t
-O-(-f rc
1:{k
_/0k
Please specifo other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.)
Page 7 of t2/o4A7/02
ooLo f 17, GLCy L?o*r 5ue b , w,.r ,.
C^ S. u.( - V" r l*7c- , V L.
UTILIW LOCATION VERIFICATION
'l
This form is to verifo service availability and location for new cdnstruction and should be used in
conjunstion with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations, The location and availability of
utilities, whether they are main trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the
following utilities for the accompanying site plan.
Authorized Siqnature Date
QWESr
970,384.0238 (tel)
970.384.0257 (fax)
Contact: Jason Sharp
EXCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS
970.262.4077 (tel)
Contact: Brian Sulzer
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC,
970.949.5892 (tel)
970.949.4s66 (fax)
Contact: Ted Husky
EXCEL ENERGY
970.262.4024 (tel)
970.262.4038 (fax)
Contact: Kit Bogart
EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANTTATIONDISTRICT* | .
97O.476.748O (tel)
970.476.4089 (fax)
Contact: Fred Haslee
AT&T BROADBAND
970.949.t224 x 112 (tel)
970.949.9138 (fax)
Contact: Floyd Salazar
//zo/*b./
tKo(
l-zz-n4
I lrb o4
l+..,"-
*Please provide a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when obtaining approval from the Eagle River Water
& Sanitation District, Fire flow needs must be addressed.
NOTES;
1. If the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments
are made directly on the form, the Town will presume that there are no problems and the
development can proceed.
2. If a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative shall
note directly on the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved.
The issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep
in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve identified
oroblems.
3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way Permit
from the Department of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utilifu locations must be obtained before
diqging in any public right-of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A building permit is not a
Public Way oermit and must be obtained separately.
Page B of LZl02l07l02
-. ') ).-/ Ll
r'ii
/u.L--> d^l' t4v,o<..t ffcl'a
a /-4t'27-at
Buildino Materials
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
I ri ..... -.,1 , i'rr ,
FIues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting
Other
PROPOSED MATERIALS
Tvoe of Material Color
Notes:
Please specify the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip,
Page 6 of I2/O2|O7/02
,r-,T\
Aq*&;, "\ Suruey/Site ptan Reqiew ghecktist
ffi, :) Department or community Deveropment
I0l4nr \FvTIny ^'i.Tii;Tr,5,13"dtj,?i"f10*#u"
web: www.ci.vail,co.us
:::,;:,::::::::w:::::-fr :::;:*_::-'"*'deve'|'pmenL
Project Address:
Applicant:
Submittalo Stamped survey of propertyo Civil/Site plans
Survev Reouirements:
o Surveyor's wet stamp and signatureO Date of SurveyO North anowo Proper scale (1"=10'or 1"=20')a Legal description \
Phone Number;4tr.rc7o
o' Landscape planq 'ntle Report (Section B)
o Environmental Hazards (ie. rockfall, debris
flow, avalanche, wetlands, floodplain, soils)o Watercourse setback (if applicable)cl Trees
o Labeled easements (i.e. drainage, utility,\- pedestrian. etc...)o Topography, a Utility locationso Adjacent roadways labeled and edge of
asphalt for both sides of the roadway shown
for a minimum of 250' in either dire<tion
from property.
tr
0
o
Basis of bearings / Benchmark
Spot Elevations '
tabeled right of way and property lines;
including bearings, distances and curye
information.a Lot Sizeo Buildable Area (excludes red hazard
avalanche, slopes greater than 40olo, and
floodplain)
Site Plan Reouirements:
L Access (check all)
ar Driveway type and finished surface are shown on the site plan.o Unheated { neated (portion in ROW in a separate zone)ci Snow storage areas are shown on the site plan within property boundaries (30yo of driveway area ii
unheated; 10o/o of driveway area if heated)s/ All driveway grades, dirnensions, radii are clearly noted on the site plan and conform to Development
. Standards, p. 11. Steepest Section Driveway Grade (not the average grade: 3 '/.
o1 Parking spaces and turning radii are noted on site plin and confornibbevelopment Standards,
pp.12&14
I1. Construction Site (check all)e/ Location of all utilities and meter pits are shown on the site plan,n/ Limits of disturbance construction fencing is shown on the site plan,f I am aware that approved Staging and Construction Traffic Control Plans, as per the Manual of
, Uniform Traffic Control Devices, will be necessary prior to construction,d I am aware that a Revocable Right of Way Permit will be required prior to construction.
Page 11 of I2l02lO7{OZ
6
{
UL Drainage (check all that apply)P The required Valley Pan is shown on the site plan as per Develgpment standards, p. 12.a, (Note: Valley pan must not be heated)t/ 4 Foot Concrete Panl't -o B Foot Concrete Panr Positive and adequate drainage is maintained at all times within the proposed site.a culverts have been provided and are labeled and dimensioned on the site plan. .,o A Hydraulic report has been provided. (As requested by Town Engineer)
IV. Erosion Control (Check all that apply)a Disturbance area is greater than one half acre.o _ A separate Erosion control Plan has been professionally engineered and pE stamped.a/ Less than one half acre has been disturbed, and proper erosion control devices are shown on the sitepbn.
V. Floodplain (check all that apply)o The project lies wlthin or adjacent to a 100 year Floodplain.o 100 year Floodplain is shown on the site plan.e A Fioodplain study has been provided. (Required if floodplain is within construction limits or as
requested by Town Engineer)d The project does not lie within or a_djacent to a 100 year Floodplain
Geologica/Environmental Hazards (check all that apply)
The project lies within a Geologic/Environmental Hazard area. (See Development Standards, p. 20)
AHazard Report has been provided
o The project does not lie within a Geologic/Environmenbl Hazard area.
VIL Grading (check all that appty) ' *
tr Existing and proposed gradet/contours are providqd on the site plan.
crz All disturbed areas have been returned to a 2:1 grade.d All disturbed areas not returned to 2:1 grade have been Professionally Engineered with slope
protection and/or stable soils. PE stamped details are provided within plans.o Only existing contours are shown on the site plan, there is no proposed grading.
VIII. Parking (check all)o' All residential and commercial parking spaces conform to the Development Standards, pp. 12&1.5,
H, Retaining Walls (check all that apply)
o/ All retaining walls conform to the standards in the Development Standards, p. 19.d All retaining walls and combination walls over 4 feet have been Professionally Engineered and a PE
stamped detail has been provided within the plans.
d All retaining walls are shown on the site plan, with labeled top and bottom of wall elevations and type
of wall construction.o No retaining walls are required for this project.
X, Sight Distance (check all that apply) tf 4o Proper sight distance has been attained and shown on site plan as per Development Standards, p,12.oPropersightdistancehasnotbeenattained.Exp|anationwhy:-
Additional Comments
Please provide any additional commenE that pertain to public Works Review,
Page 12 of l2l02l07lD2.
Applicants
Jan OB OrS Ol:51p
John Purchase
eun$ase s7576-o14s p.2
Page 1 of2
From: dnockstbacol@rof.neg
Sent: Thurcday, August 21, 2003 1 :57 pM
To: johnlpurchase@hoUTail.com
Subjece Site Visit
Re: l3l0 Glen Lyon Road
John L. Purchase
754 E. Potato Patch Dr
Vail, CO 81657
DEarMr. Purchase:
At your request I visited th3 can{oned-pro- p9ry today with you for the purpose of providing my generalopinion of the debris flow hazard to wfi* tnei"J lr.fp*..drArt;;;"*uy, Toum of Vait geotogrcI-*{ maps suggest that the e)(treme westem edge of the lot is included in the moderate debris flowhazard category.
The lot is located at the easJem-edge of a smatl alluvial fan developed at the mouth of a modestdrainage. The moderate debris floi zone O"*O-^ i: dr; alo;;'a low but distina ridge that will keepany debris flow material over the fan to the west df tdpnrperryfr tlt! *ta"-*"" of aoflon ct* LyonRoad itself; the current Pdmuty chanuel of the drainagJi, i'"rr r'iitrr" *""t. rt i, in fact not completelyclear if the t'azardzoneincludis any.o.f thg p;n"rt" oi irthe zone and property boundaries are ictrattycoincidenq lEin anv case tle hazaia is miiimla. iiail;i.,jilioJ*io"orpot" rhe exfieme west endof theparcel, Town of Vail rqulations can be sarisfied q,.".ril6th;itlr. pru*ot drain4ge regime isnot significantly altered, w.tricfr oan be accomplis4ea uy ftfreavi"E trt" riag" mentioned above in place
3l"ltj1iy^":dtc equivalent structures in fi;ar draids;a;st-(A ;;" n rn ,i-pi"-*Jor"u!. ordrsh[banoes, to constnrctionof berms or rock walls, o.Io .onii."tion oiTounaatioo.'ru*,.i*ilowithstand and^dfect potential,dcbris flow); -a 1u1it"*ti;t r"did;; of oristing drainage on theeastern part ofthe cul-de-sac-by consruclion orl ldi""way
"itrr* "itrt" "-isting
grade ofthe road or ona slight up-grade into the lotJbn that portion that may lie#fl,i;A;;60"d hazard zong which Iestimate at no more than 15 feet.
In t}*Ttty,."lthough the debris flow hazard to which the property is exposed is not nonodstent it isminimal, and there is nothing to indicate ttrat
"ortr.ruq"ire,i t"
""ripfy-o,itn fo*n of Vail requirementsregarding the mapped hazard category will be significant q,t;:;G; ;';diog of rhe wesrem part of
ne*[|:r#T*rfvou have anv quistions or'""quit*y tunh;;-itiforlrr"irioo"Itni, m"!i;fi"
Siacerely,
BruceA. Collinq ph.D.
Consulting Geologist
cPG7016
Bruce A. Collins, Ph.D., C.p.G.
dba Collins & Associues
Geological & Natural Resource Consultants
r/8t2004
Punchssco
P.O. Box 23
Silt, Colorado 81652 USA
bacol@rof.net
Phone/Fax (97 0>87 6-5 4OO
97o:476-Olif9 P.3
O ?zseZoil
Jen O8 Oz+ Ol:Slp
u812004
a ,), ,,- )-'(t"r'
HUt 6.ta
854131
P.g.: I ot Itart1rm L
D ra.sa
. .-,...., .i;.ir"/n...., ).
. iftp offq,, *"oC.qp ihis d.y or
rretrlrn . JoHN o. lrHlB
of the _ Cq'|tt of
WARRANTYDEED
JOHI{ I,AYTON ruTCHASEAND LTRA JUNE PURCHASE a'- /-l| ': '?>z
t-0)
dlo!! t.!.t *e' i"-- Mldd(&lrlrlltbl6l t All ffilMl 751 p0TATO PATCH DRIIE- UAIL- CO At6s7
ot thc _ cd'|ty of _E q!E_ sd st!t. of of th€ G.flrtcc(s):
WITNASS. Ih.t th. Gr.ntor(i). for .fd ih co.Ei&mtiofl ot th. .ur ot ( $625.1m.m )
's sii Hrrdrld Talnly Fiv. Tln -r.r|d rd |Ivl(D ... IX)LI,ARS
tne ..c.ipt -rd ruttici.rEy ol dricl 13 hcf.bt .ctndt.dg.d. hs. g.Irt.d. b..CbirEd, sotd rd cdwly€d, td by th6e
p.esant3 6e3 grdrt, b.sEin, sett. co.$/€y ..d cdrfir. urto the Gr.ntce(s). th.ir hcirs sd a8sisns loreFr,
not in te.i..Ey in ccn hlt in joint tcidlct, .tl th..!€t p.operty, togeth!. rith i4'rolr*nts. if J|y. situatc,
tyir€ ild b.in9 in thc _ co.nty ot EaCLE and st.tG ot cotordo, .lc.c.ib.d.c fottc:
Lin17. AMENTED ptar.mE6N3uED-rvrslo - AC@-RDING To rfle plrr *rcoloeo tr{]arE i]^ct-E couNTY
RECDRDS. COUI{TY oF EACLE, STATE OF COI,ORAD0.
.lso lrpt.r as rtr.ct I[-e. I3IOGREENHILL COURT. VAIL Caal6Jt
TOCETHER rith .tt .nd slrEirla. .td h.rcditGrti .rd atFft.rwtces th.r.to bctslgin9, or in cnyrise +ertainingdd the rcversiar Jd revefsia|s, r.cinder dd rcPi.d.rs. rents, issrEs rd p.ofits thcrc{f; fld all th! estate, rilhttitl. irt.r6t. cl.i. rd dsn d|ltsocttr ot thc Grdltor(!), eith.r in lar or .qrity, of, in ed to thc.borc ba.g€itEdp...is.3, r.ith th! h€fcdi tGrt! rd Tprrt€ndEes;m IIAVE AllD TO HOLD th.s.id pr.rii.s &v! b.rrEined rd describcd yith rffu.tloancesr rnto the Gr t€c(s),thlir hlirs -d 63i9'lr forever. lh. Gr$to.(s), for hir.!tf. his h.ir3 lrd Frrarlt rcprB.nt.tiver, docs covcrxnt,
barg.in. .rd ag.ee to atd |.ith the Gr.nte?(.r, thlir h.irs ..d aErig.E, that .t the tiE ol th! "nseat
irE rd d.tivery
of th6G Prca€nt., he is |€lt 3lizcd ot th. F!.i!€s .bov. cqw€yld, ha. go.d, 3r|.., Frfcct. abotute fld iri.l.s.ib{e
.st.t. ot inhcrit.r€e, in tar. in f6 si?tG, rd hs sood risht, tutt F... ..d llrtul ruthori ty to g..nt, bd.sf,in.!.lt dd cdrvty th. 3- in EEr and fo.. G .tr.s.id. rd tft.t t|i. s.- ..G fra dd ct.ar f....tt fo.*r ard oth€.grrrt3, b.rieirE, s.16, ti€tr., taxas. 6E6.Dnts, .iElra.rEe. ..d ..stridioft3 of rhat€vcr kind or rratt|.c socvar,
EXCEPT GET{ER,AL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS F()R TflE YEAR lxB AND SUESEQUENT YEARS. TAX2
Ih. Gtmto.(s) shatt rd vitt ll tl IT rlo f(nEv€t D€ttD th. lbov€ b.rgaiEd tr!.i!e3 in thc $i.t rd Fscobl.posiB5im ot tie Grfitc€(sr, hir h.i.6 :fd arig[|s. {air|.t rtt {td lvcry F..!.r or F.sdE Lsfutly ctriainr thc aiotco. dry F t throt. Ih. iin{ullr n-.. G$.ll Inctd. rhe ptur.l, srd th! Flu.rt thc iirEul.r, rd ihc (|3. of iry g.rjcr
shatt be a99tic.bt. to.lt gsr&f8.
lN Wm{ESS WfiARPOF .hG Grdrtor(i) h.. Grecutcd this decd cr ttc d.t. 3!t forrh &vc-
instfl-nt r.s ack Frlc4€d bcforc E .n this d.y o(
ard statc o{ Cd(rrdo , of the Gr-tor(s), tE
e!r.$.d5.-:P;l 3 JzaS ,
ffiIH,USIHHilru
rittct vlo0e2z50
Forr ro. 92lA l€e 4-94.
sr^rE of r L '-e-172{4 >04ri J^,, * Qn*.*t-i*
'."i, e*d;-'*ril* ? - /4 -Jo o/
: li trl.ca-{y t |ld id officiat scrl-
-:... .-"-..'J.it]t.-'.. _'
.1
-l
land Title Guarantee Conpany
DaB: JawryE,,?fra
,OHN I.AYTON PURCIIASE AI..ID IARA ruNE PIJR,CI{ASE
13TO GREENHILL @I'RT
v^tr- o|El6J7
h.loscd Dlc$q 6nd the rirle inware policy for yourpropa.ty
loettd il l3l0 GREENHIIJ- COtIpr vllr rrr nrrie
Thc followi4g cndo,rscmcrrs irc irrcJrdcd ir fiis policy;
Dclaion of Bn:rprions l-3
Delaion of Gmal Exccpriol l
Plerse rcvicw rhis policy il is emkety. h tbe weu thar you find ray rliscrcpary, or if yoo lave aly quesriols
rcgrrdilg your trnal drh policy, yol ltlay coftrct Tirlc Dcprrhar
tuo*:90-476-?251 Fu:nU,'64732
Pleasc rcftr to oorOdcrNo. V50q8250
Sbould you dcidc n sclf rlc propcny dcrcribtrl io &is policy, or if yol ele rcgsird ro pulritns r res rirte
cottr'ltrmcot ftr trongagc purposcs, you Eley b? cniirled o a credit o*ild frtltr€ tide insoraw;c pwrniums-
r 'rxr Tialc Guenlltce Coryany will rcain r copy of rhis policy so wc sill bc able to providc foiurE producrs
rt|.r scrvices & you qnckly and cfiffciortly.
Tbmk you for gvitrg ns rbc opporoniry ro sctre you.
$lccrely,
laud Tide Guararce Coryuy
.'v J3e vccr o f-!tt T.vuttv$a t-vt 3
LTGFolicyI{0. CrAtj(XXEl50
OurOrdcrNo. V50002250 Sch.dulc A Amoln3 t625,0@.00
topcrty Addrcss: l3l0 GREENHILL COURT VAIL CO 816j7
l. folictDile Ocober l?, 2fi1[f at 5:00 p,M,
2, Nerue of Imrcd:
JOHN I,AYTON PTJRCXTASB AND LARA JUNE PUR,CIIASE
3. Itc GstaE tr inttttst in tt: lard dcscribcd or rrfared to in ttris Schcduh aod which is covercd by tbis poticy is:
A Fcc Sinplc
4. Titts to &e csrate or hlcrest covcrcd by &is polity et tbe drte hcrcof, is vesrcd ir:
JOHN I.AYTON PURCHASEAND I.ARA JI'I{E PURQIASE
5. I[e hnd rcfcrrcd fo in tbb dict ir dcrcribd as fdtors:
LoT 17, AMENDED PLA,T GISN LYON SUBDlvrSlON, AC@RD|NGTO THE pLAr R€CoRDED tN
TI{E EAGLE @UNTY RE@RDS, @UNTY OF EACT.E, STATE OF COI.oRADO.
Tbis Folicy valid ooly if Sclcrluh B lr rftaclcd.
Iad Tith Gleralnc Compcny
R.grecmtirg Cbicego ftdr lnsurarce Comlery
Our Ondcr No. V5000250
I.
Schcdulg B
Ttris policy does mt insure sgrilsr loss or druge (o,rd rhe Conpany will mt pr,y costs, r.rrrncys, fecs or erp311sc{)wlict arise by reasoa of:
Gcrtr.rl Ercqrriols:
RiShrS or cl:tlns of prnics in possessioa aot shown by rhc prblic ecorrds.
ft5grrpnr<, g; nhinrc of alscrqots, oor sbo*u by &c pubtic records.
Discrqpuirs. contlicts in bouudrry liro, shoregc iu uEe, c[ctor.hm.nr<, rrd eny frcts which r corrEc! survey rrr,ioseccdoo of Sc premias w,oulO disctosc ra *i* arc noi stown uy ruc prbtic rccords.
Auy tico, or dght @ r tia, br services, labc, or matcriel lpctofore or hcreafier fumishcd, iraposcd by taw urdmt showl by 6c public rccords.
2OO3 TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS NOT YET DI,'E OR PAYABI-E.
R,IGHT OF WAY FOR DTTG{ES OR CANALS MNSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORTTY OF THEUNTTED STATESAS RESERVED IN T'NITED STATES PATENT RE@RDED DECEMBBR29,
1920, lN x)ox 93 AT PAOE 42-
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITTJRE OR R,EVERTER dAUSE,
BUT OMTTINGANY COVENANT oR, RESTRICI(oN BASED oN RA@, @LoR. RELIGIoN,sE'(, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS oR NATIONAL oRrcIN t NLEss AND oNLy ro TIIEEX1TNT TIIAT SAID @\'ENANT (A) TS E(EMPT T'NDER C}IAPIER,42, SEENON 3607 OPTIIE UNITED STATES 6DE OR (B) REI-ATES TO HANDICA,P BUT DOES NOT
DISCRTMINATE AGAINST HANDICAP PERSONS, AS CDNTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDEDAPRIL ()4, I97E, IN BOOK 268 AT PAGE 698 AND AS AMENDED IN TNSTRI'MENT
RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1987, rN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 447 TI{R,OUGT| 47J AND ASAMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RE@RDED SEFTEMBER 15, DT', IN BOOK 469 AT PA6E 8OIAND AS RE@RDED SEPTEMBER,3, 1987 IN BOOK {69 AT fAGE 38 AND 39 AND
AMENDMENT THERETO REORDED N(AY 2, 1990 lN soOK 52E AT pAC€ t54.
EASEMENT AND RIOHT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTEIT{ANCE OF AN ELECTRJC
STSTEM, A5 GRANTED TO }IOLY CROSS ELECTRJC ASg)CIATTON BY GORE CREEK
ASSOCIATES, IN TI{S INSTRUMENT RECORDED APR,IL 2{, T978 IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE277.
EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICfIONS AS SHOWN AND RESERVED ON TT{E
RECORDED AMENDED PI.AT OF CLE}I LYON SUBDTVISION.
ITEMS T T}fiOUG}I 3 OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS UNDERSCHEDULE BI ARE IIEREBY
l.
4.
5.
7.
6.
9.
LnGhticrrfr. Cr@d
Ou0rdcrNo. V50O022S0
Scfcdulc E
DEI..ETED,
ITEIU NO. 4 OF lI{E GENEN,AL E(CEPTIONS t5 DELEre E(CEPT AS TO ANY LIENSRESI'LTINGFROM woRr( oR MATERIAL or.rlinctro FoR oR FuRI.[sirED Ar rHE ReuEsrOF'OHN I.AYTON PT'RCII^SE AND I.EN.C.]U-I.IE PUNCTASE.
MSNHotnail -Page I of I
msr#. Hotmail*
lo hn I pu rchase ad hotmai l. com
Frcm : dnocks <bacol@rof.net>
SGnt: Thursday. August 21,2003 1:57 PM
To:iJhnlpurchase@hotrnail.com
$bj€ct : Site Visit
Re: 1310 Glen Lyon Road
John L. Purchase
754 E. Potato Patch Dr.
Vail, CO 815s7
Dear Mr. Purdrase:
At your request I visited the captioned property today with )ou for the purpce of providing my general opinion of the debris
floi hazard to which the lot is expo6ed. As you are away, Towrl of vail geologic hazard map6 suggest that the extreme l^|estem
edge of the lot is included in the moderate debris flow hazard category.
The lot is locded at the eastem edge of a small alluvial fan developed at the mouth of a modest drainage. The moderate debris
f,ow zone boundary is drawn alongi low but distinct ridge that will keep any debris flow material over tfie fan to the west of the
pmperty, in the culde-sac of and on Glen Lyon Road itself; the current Fimary channel of the drainage is t\tell to the west. It is
in fact not completely clear if the hazard zone includes any of the property or if the zone and property boundaries are actually
coincjdent, but in any c6e tf|e hazard is minirnal. If the boundary does incorporate the extrerne r,vest end of the parcel, Town of
Vail regulations can be satisfied by assuring that the present drainage regirne is not significandy altered, whici can be
accornplished by (a) leaving the ridge mentioned above in place or by incorpording equivalent structlres in final drainage deson
(can range from simple nesbration of distufiances, to construction of berms or rock walls, or to construction of foundations
jufficiernto wihstand and direct potential debris flow); and (b) preventir€ redirection of existing drainage on the eastern part of
the cul-de-sac by constructjon of a dri\reway either at the existing grade of the road or on a slight up-grade into the lot for that
portion that may lie within the mapp€d hazard zone, which I estimate at no more than 15 feet.
In summary, allfiough the debris flow hazard to which the prop€rty is expo,sed is not nonodstent it is minimalr and there is
nothing to indicate tnat costs required to comply with Town of Vait requirements regarding the mapped hazard category will be
significart unless major regrading of the western part of $e lot is desired. If you have any questions or require any furthet
information at this time olease do hesitate to contact me.
Sincerdy,
Bruce A. Collins, Ph.D.
Consulting Geologbt
cPG 7016
Bruce A. Collins, Ph.D., C.P.G,
dba Collins & Associat€s
Geological & Naturd Resour@ Consultants
P.O. Box 23
Slt, Colorado 81652 USA
bacol@rof.net
Phone/Fax (9rc)-876-5400
http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/gefinsg?curmbox:F 151629646&a:d56cc7c87 ... l/2212004
Status:
I Approved
Gorvrruumry DEVELopMENT Rounnc Fonur
-[ npproved with conditions I Denied
Routed To:Mike VafEllfir FIRE
Date Routed:02t02t04
Routed By:Planner
Date Due:ozt09t04
Description of work:New Construction, Single-family residence
Address:1310 GreenhillCourt
Legal:Lot:117 lBlock:Subdivision:Glen Lyon
Gomments:Date Reviewed:
Need additional review bv Fire Department.
(C.L1*.
Status:
I Approved
corvtnufiry DevelopmENr Rourilc Fonn
I Approved with conditions 8 Denied
Routed To:Leonard Sandoval, PW
Date Routed:
Routed By:Planner
Date Due:
Description of work:New Construction . SFR
Address:1310 Green HillCt.
Lesal:Lot:17 Block:Subdivision:Glen Lyon
Gomments:Date Reviewed:
Fire lssues.Need additional review by Fire
Provide Title
Heated portion of driveway in TOV Right of way must be on a separate zone, marked at control
box. Per TOV standards. Show on site plan.
Show on site - Limits of disturbance fence.
Show on site olan - Erosion control olan per TOV standards.
Swale on north side of lot is show flowinq up hill. Adiust and revise
Norht side of lot, existing grade exceeds 2:1, when disturbed, grade must return to 2:1. or must
be approved bv staff and DRB. Adiust and revise.
Provide stamped approved drawing from a license PE for retaining wall exceeding 4 - 6 ft. in
Drawino to be submitted when aoolvino for buildinq permit.
Fire Sprinkler svstem is required. Home exceeds the Fire department hose requirements.
Proposed tree on north side of driveway on landscaping plan must be moved back 10 ft from
of asphalt. adiust and revise.
Revcable of is
lsandoval
-tf p
-..l
r r,,.!
Department of C ommunity Deve lopment
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-21 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
February 23,2004
Michael Lauterbach
POB 3451
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Michael,
Pursuant to our conversation on February 18,2004, the following are comments from the
Design Review Board (DRB), Planning, Public Works, and the Fire Department:
DRB:
- It is essential that the Northwest elevation of the house be done with extreme
care and sensitivity for the neighbor on that (downhill) side. Details in key
areas, such as underneath the deck, will be extremely important.- Does the deck (NW elevation, mid level) really need to be that large? It
seems that it could overwhelm the neighbors. Perhaps if you could clip back
one or both comers of that deck, some trees might be saved.- The knee (elbow) braces used throughout the design are not in character with
the rest ofthe architecture ofthe house (i.e. the braces are arched and notched,
whereas there is nothing else in the architecture indicative ofthat shape).
- ' The windows, especially on the NW elevation, are incongruous and have no
relationship or harmony with one another in terms of placement. They appear
to be a hodgepodge ofdiffelent shapes and sizes.- The retaining wall for the drivewhy on the NW side of the property should not
be just a sheer cement wall with stucco, but perhaps a sloped boulder wall
would be better and soften the effect upon the adjacentneighbor.
Planning:
- As a portion of this property is identified as being in the ModerateHazard
Debris Flow Area, properly engineered mitigation measures must be taken
during any grading on the extreme westem portion of the property.
- Please provide a topographical map with the proposed structure drawn on it
with all roof ridge elevations shown in relation to the contour line below so
that the maximum roof height can be properly verified.
{g *r"ouo rnru*
- After digitizing the proposed floor plans, the calculated GRFA on the mid and
upper levels is much higher than what you have shown. Please confirm.- AII crawlspaces must be less than five feet (5') in head height and have an
access opening no greater than twelve ( 12) square feet. Please show on plans.- The Plant Schedule shown on sheet Ll indicates that the only trees to be
planted on the site are Colorado Blue Spruce and Quaking Aspen. Please
veriff.
- The limits of disturbance fence cannot be on the actual property line,
especially on the north/northwest side of the site.
Public Works:
- The heated portion of the driveway situated in the Town of Vail (TOV) right-
of-way must be on a separate zone and marked at the control box. Per the
TOV standards, show this on the site plan.- Show on the site plan: a Limits of Disturbance Fence.- Show on the site plan: an Erosion Control Plan per the TOV standards.- The swale on the north side of the lot is shou.n as flowing uphill. Please
adjust and revise.
- Existing grade on the north side of the lot exceeds 2: 1 . When disturbed, the
grade must retum to 2: l, or must otherwise be approved by the Design. Review Board and staff. Please adjust and revise.- Provide an approved, stamped drawing from a licensed P.E. for retaining
walls that exceed 4-6 feet in height. The drawings are to be submitted when
applying for the building permit.- A fire sprinkler system is required since the proposed residence exceeds the
hose length standards of the Fire Department.- The tree proposed to be planted on the north side of the driveway must be
moved ten feet (10') back from the edge ofasphalt. Please adjust and revise.- A Revocable Right-of-Way Permit is required in association with this
proposal.
Fire Department:
- The Fire Department requires 360 degree circumferential travel around the
structure, which cannot be achieved with this proposal.
- The highestridge beam is 95' from approved staging.- There is a second ridge beam that appears to be approximately 44' above
approved staging.- With the 6' rock wall in back of the house, there is no rear access.- There are combustible materials 30' above the approved staging.- An automatic fire sprinkler system is required, as is a monitored fire alarm
system, given the information provided in your submittal.
If you have any questions conceming the comments listed above, please contact me
directly. In order to proceed with this application for final review on the March 3,2004,
DRB agenda, the aforementioned issues must be addressed, and new materials received,
no later than 12:00 noon, Monday, March 1,2004.
Sincerely,, r, ,,%44M
Mafthew R. Gennett, AICP
Town Planner
The Town of Vail
(970) 479-2140
February 26,2004
Matt Gennett, AICP
Town Planner
Town of Vail Community Development
Vail, CO E1657
Dear Matt:
I took a "rough cut" at placing the Purchase residence 30 ft from the northwest lot
line instead of 15 ft. I am enclosing a layout of it. Because the lot widens, I think the
home now fits on the lot much better, gives them a nice buffer of mature trees rather than
new landscaping and gives me much better privacy. I think it is "win-win". I also think
there are many more trees saved than show on the topo. I estimate the driveway will be
lengthened about 20 ft. at about an 87o slope. This slope should not be a problem
because the driveway was already going to be heated.
Please call me on my cell (303 - 947-2749) with yourthoughts. I also want to
thank you for your very prompt faxing of the DRB preliminary review.
Yours sincerelv.
{>. t. gi-t..-=-->
Barry Cunningham
Status:
I Approved
co"tut y DEVELopMENT nourilc Fonrrl
I Approved with conditions E Denied
Routed To:Leonard Sandoval. PW
Date Routed:
Routed By:Matt Gennett
Date Due:
Description of work:Revisions
Address:1310 GreenHillCt.
Legal:Lotr 117 Block:I Subdivision:Glen Lyon
Comments:Date Reviewed:
Fire rtment lssues. Need additional review by Fire
Provide title
Provide oradinq plan
is proposed drainage swale to flow when it
Revocable riqht of it - Buildinq permit staqe
Stamoed PE d for retainino wall- buildinq Dermit stage.
lsandoval
March2,2004
Town of Vail
Desigr Review Board
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Design Review Board Members and Town of Vail Staff;
As the neighbor immediately below the proposed Purchase home, I am extremely
concerned about its impact on my property. Because it is elevated on piers to provide covered
parkinq, it has far more bulk and mass than is necessary, thus creating a structure that is out of
scale with the neighborhood. Its very large deck also has a very negative affect on my privacy,
particularly since the building site is presently at the minimum 15 ft. setback
As you are aware, the covered parking and the deck are not counted in the GRFA but
they certainly affect the mass of the house and I believe make this design closer to a commercial
building than a private home. Because of this, I think the house should be treated differently and
moved to the south approximately 35 ft. from the lot line to take advantage of the existing buffer
of mature pine and aspen trees. The present topo map submitted to the DRB is very misleading
because it does not show all the existing trees. The additional setback would provide a buffer of
over 20 mature trees and the building site placement would actually be more compatible with the
neighboring homes, as required by 10A in the Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook.
The house imrnediately to the west of lot 17 was constructed right on Greenhill Court, with no
landscaping between it and the cul de sac. However, the next 3 homes to the west are all set
back from the road, as I am proposing, with their garages E ft. to 12 ft. above Greenhill Court.
My proposal would cause the driveway to be about the same tength as at the other homes and the
revised building site would provide more privacy for Mr. Purchase and me. Overall the house
would be much more compatible with the neighborhood.
I believe this project should be suspended until the privacy and neighborhood
compatibitity problems can be further studied. In addition. I would like to see the Town Staff
further address the following:
Tree Survey - Section l2-Ll-4 of the Town Code outlines the submittal requirements
for a DRB application. A survey is required which indicates all trees with trunks of 4" or greater
measured l' above grade. The survey that was submitted only indicates a select few large
conifers. When reviewing the plans, the tree survey gives a very inaccurate perceptionlhat there
are few trees being impacted by the driveway and building footprint. In order to meet the code
requirement and to provide an accurate depiction of the impacts of the project we request that no
further review by the DRB be conducted on this project until such time as an accurate tree survey
has been provided. Additionally, the Code also required that the landscape plan depict all trees
being removed. This requirement has also not been met and therefore further review by the DRB
should be suspended.
Design Review Board
March 2,2003
Page2
SlopeiSite Coverage - Section 12-21-14 of the Town Code requires that where
proposed buildings and driveways are located on slopes in excess of 30o/o, the site coverag€
allowed is reduced to l5o/o of the site area. The site is 23,371 sq. ft. in area and thus the
resulting allowable site coverage is 3,559.6 sq. ft. Has a detailed measurement been provided to
substantiate this requirement? Additionally, there are other requirements of section 12-21-14
such as providing a soils and foundation report from a professional engineer. The DRB should
discontinue its review of the project if these requirements have not been submitted.
Geology Report - The geologic hazardreport provided by the applicant seems
somewhat inadequate to allow proper review and evaluation by staffor the DRB. The report
does not provide clear direction, as there are no maps or graphics depicting the areas ofconcern
or depicting mitigation measures. It is clear from the report that the geologist has not reviewed
the proposed development plan to offer whether or not the proposed project complies with the
Haz.afi Regulations. Further, the report does not contain the proper findings as required by
section 12-21-15 of the Town Code. The report is not stamped or signed by a "professional
geologist." The DRB should discontinue review ofthis project until an adequate site-specific,
geologic investigation/report has been prepared and submitted to the Town.
In summary, this proposed home is located on the far north boundary of a large
development site. There is ample space with adequate access to move the proposed structure
further to the south. Moving the home to the south and modifying the driveway location will
allow the applicant to maintain a natural landscape buffer to the homes to the north. The site is
heavily forested and it makes sense to preserve mature trees and vegetation where it creates
compatibility and provides physical and visual buffers to adjoining properties. Having the home
moved to the south will help make the project consistent with the design guidelines, thus
furthering the goals of the Town.
Yours sincerely,
$.r. &>-
Barry Cunningham )
BEC:ka
6"n (lovt
Lzf rz
TOI4'NM
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: PURCHASE CHANGE DRB Number: DR8040430
Project DescripUon:
CHANGES FOR A New single family residence
Participants:
OWNER Purchase, John & Lara 08/20/2004 Phone:
754 Potato Patch Drive
Vail
co 816s7.
License:
APPUCANT STEVEN JAMES RIDEN, AIA 08/20/2004 Phoner
PO BOX 3238
VAIL
co 81658
License:
Project Address: 1310 GREENHITI CT VAIL LocaUon: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO
Legal Descriptionr Lot: 17 Block Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB.
Parcel Number: 210312403015
Commentsr see condiUons
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:
Vote: Date ofApproval: 09/15/2004
Conditions:
Cond: I
(PUN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PI-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Gond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $20.00
otilons-Residentia I o, at terciat
Application for Design Review R *.
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to
the submittal requiremen$ for the particular approval that is requested. An applicaton for Design Review cannot be
accepted until all required information is received
'by
the Community Development Department. The project may also need
to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses
unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval.
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
teli 97 0.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479'2452
web: www.vailgov.com
Description of the Request:
LocationoftheProposal: r-ot /? alock:- 5u66iuir1on kL(/ LfiCN
physicarAddress: 11/ a (nCfflVllttt CT ' VA tu , co 816 S I
parcef No.: 2 | O ? | |-Y a'2 ol { (contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):-'n,tn/ E *za Puzclrn{Purt
Mailing Addressr OF (A *-c2 &tUs7
- 36
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicane SSTUvat dnwa; clOry 4tA
Mailing Address:o.Y JZ3 X Lo YlLf [''
E-mail Address:
Type of Review and Fee:
D Signs
E Conceptual Review
E New Construction
tr Addition
El Minor Alteration
(multi-fam ily/commercial )
O Minor Alterauon
.1gingl+familY/duPlex)
d Changes to Approved Plans
- Separation Request
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild'
$fOO For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions)'
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing,painting,windowadditions,landscaping,fencesandretaining
walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining
/.-' . walls, etc.
6Zo) For ievisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or $e Design\--'z Review Board.
No Fee
Page 1 of t2104/28104
t
ZOND CI{ECKJt
Lcgal dcscription: Lot
A d drcss
Osncr
Architcct
Zonc disrrict Q
Lot sizc
Allorvcd Existin s:z!35: o
*=lrl toP
+ 675 = 425 crcdir plus 250 addition ' Ll6x tot@ = 1'fu4.38> fioao z l,rroo(Docs tlris rcqucst involvc a 250 Addition?
L.rndscaping
Rcaining Wall Hci
ParUng
Caragc Crcdit
Drivcrvay
Conrplics rrirb TOV Liglting
Arc finishcd gradcs lcss tlan 2:l
Enr.ironmcntal4lazards
Prcr,ious cbndirions of approval (cbcck propcrty filc);
ls rhc propcrty non-conforming? Dcscribc:
Irllo
Horv much.of tlc allo\vcd 250 Addition is uscd rvirh fiis rcqucst?
Sitc Covcralc
Hcigbt
Sctbacks
.13{1?31 = ),ls(6
r. .!,U
.l5'
I <l
(i00) (500) (e00) (t200)
Pcrmittcd Slopc Proposcd Slopc 9zn
Ycs_=_ No
Ycs-- No
I ) Pcrccnt Slopc (< >302.
2) Floodptain
3) Wcrl
4) Wdtcr Coursc Sctback (50)
5) Ocologic Hazards
a) SnorvA
b) Rocldall
c) Dcbris Fl
"t":ry-rius €rle^ LV on S, L"/;a=,2.L
Pbonc
Total GRFA
Prinrary ORFA
-+
1+ZS1 1et5ry =
srcondary GRFA + (125) (67j+)
. Proposcd Tota! . - Rcmaining
* 6.ott0 = 6rogiQ Jjttj -r^al6{.,. = '- --;46lxr-
o
tt
rsrr)rJilrc
^on*J"rr"o
I
, czls to,I
uondFrscp te3if
:lJEunllut g
cp)s
;
I
ilr^uns D
4cc lo:4
LTr 0
J,g1\
2iw{
v,& 0
+ * + * + * * ** * * * * * * * * {. + * * * ** * * {. * + *,t 'i * * * * r. * * * * ir * * * * * * * * * * * **t r. *:} r.1. * * ** * * * * * * * + * + {. * + + + *:} t + * * * *'l '} * *
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 09-15-2004 atl7z45:27 09/15/2004
Statement
* * * * * * * * * * + * + + * * * * * *'l +:t + + * * * * ****+**** * ********** ******* ** * * * * * *,1. * * ** * * lr * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *
Statsemenu Number: R040006470 Amount: $20.00 08/20/2OO4O2:52 P|II
Paltment Method: Check Init: JS
Notation: #1266,/STEVE
RIDETiI
Permit No: DR8040430 1)4>e: DRB-Chg t.o Appr Plans
Parcel No: 210312403 015
Site Addrese: 1310 GREEIIHILL CT VAIL
IJocation: 1310 creenhill Court, Vail, CO
Total Fee.s : $20 . 00
This Pa)ment: $20.00 Total AI.,L Etnts: 920.00
Balance: $0.00
* +'i t * * 'f * * *** * * * ** + * * *** * * * * + t * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * + * +:i ** * + {. * * *:1.:t:} * * +
'1.
* * t + ** * * * + * + * * * * * * * * * * *
ACCOI]NT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Descriptjon Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.00
o *#n
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
telt 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
DRB Number: DR8040481
Location: 1310 GREENHILL CT
Project Name:
Project Description:
PURCHASE CHANGE
NEW SFR
Lot: 17 Block Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB.
210312403015
see condiuons
Participants:
OWNER PURCHASE, JOHN 0911012004 Phone:390-9943
754 POTATO PATCH DRIVE E.
VAIL
co 81557
License:
APPUCANT STEVEN JAMES RIDEN, AIA ARCH09/10/2004 Phone : 949-4I2I
PO BOX 3238
VAIL
co 816s8
License: C000001738
1310 GREENHILL CT VAILProiect Address:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Action: STAFFAPR
Date of Approval: 09/15/2004
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $20.00Plannen
I RECEIVEB
- r':. r tt_ r'u. ,. v
=.
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.mm
General lnformation:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Description of the Request:
Application for Design Review-
Ctl*^lcrc To U:7,a^1
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Address:b,
Owner(s) Signaturr
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
Type of Review and Fee:
. Signs
. Conceptual Review
. New Construction. Addition
. Minor Alteration
(multi-family/commercial)
. Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
. Changes to Approved Plans
. Separation Request
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$6s0
$300
$2so
$20
/lizu,
No Fee
For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
re(s):
For Office Use Only:
FeePaid: n O - ct*rno.,lZbb
Meeting Date- €-tg<J3 DRB No.:Planner: JIA ; Proiec
lattlllatt*+t*lrtl*al*f ltt*tlf t*l'|**t******a**a'|la'l***l*ttl***r*l+l**la*
TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statcmeot
*all***+a+a***ri*'itat*l'|at*l+tll**l*tr,|*'|*at'ittaat*t*a***t*r***llaa*'l*t*+a';*attl*l*iala****l*
gtatenent l$rnt er: R0r10005623 Amount: $20.00 09/lO/2OO4O3:17 Pll
Palment Method: Caeh
PT'RCHASB
Init: dIS
Notation: S/JOHN
Perml.t l{o: DRB040tl81 Tt4re: DRB -Mlnor A1t, SFR/DUP
Parcel No: 210312{03015
Site Addreaa: 1310 GREEBIHIIJJ CT I,AIIJ
Location: 131.0 OREEIIHIIJIJ CT
Total Feee: $20.00
This Palmeat: 920.00 Total ALIJ Pmta: S20.00Balance: $0.00*aa*'Slaaaatfaalattttta*t*t*a**t+a*:|*taat'i*a*****t*a**ata******aar**'ta+ataatrt*r*a*l+taalllal
ACCOI,JNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current ffis
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIE|'J FEES 20.00
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of C-ommunity Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail. Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Purchase Residence DRB Number: DRB040016
Project Description:
Final review of a new single family residence
Participants:
OWNER Purchase, John & Lara OLl26l2O04 Phone'.
754 Potato Patch Drive
Vail
co 81657
License:
APPLICANTMichaelLauterbach 01/2612004Phone:
PO Box 3451
Vail
co 81658
License:
ProjectAddress: 1310 GREENHILL CTVAIL Location: 1310 Greenhill Couft, Vail, CO
Legal Description: Lot: 17 Block3 Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB.
Parcel Number: 210312403015
Comments: see conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Viele
Second By: Woldrich
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approval: 03/03/2004Vote: 5-0
.,";;;", i. '4'1'*-'o^'{ ;-P"l<
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: CON0006326
That the applicant revises the design review board plans to depict the relocation of
the house 8 - 9 feet further back (to the southeast) on the lot to provide more of a
buffer for the neighbor to the NE, prior to application for a building permit.
Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paidr $650.00
Application for Design Review
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Fronbge Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 fax: 970.479'2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
t,r(,'ol.^.-
t---
T014,[,m
General Information:
one year of the approval,
Description of the Request:
All prclects requiring design review must receive approval prior to s:bmitting a building permit applicabon. ?lease
refer to the submittal requirements for the particulai approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted untii all required information is received by the Community Development Departrnent.- The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
beiign review approval lapses unless a bulldlng permlt ls issued and construction coynences wit'lrin
Location of the Proposa l: tot: 17 dock:- Subdivision: 6 l e n LY ' n
Ptrysical Address:
parcel No.: 2 | o j t > | d 3. I S (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Name of Applicant:
E-mail Address:Fax:
-1r'oAttp-reAt{iQ e.n ct31-.h-{ *rypeitRevidwandFee: /tr-51^rnef .afo17(-1 . n'f
E y'rgns $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area'
d Conceotual Revierrv No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild'
tr Addition is00 :nilXTli"J,r[i"hn:.Jfr'S;".ffi:"1olT.l?,:fl"ff:l:,tl:].*
tr Minor Alterataon $250 For minor changeslo buildings and site improvements, such as,
(multi-family/commercial) reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
tr Minor Alteration $20 For minor dranges to buildings and site improvements' such as'
(single-family/duptex) reroofing, pairiting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
D Changes to Approved Plans
tr Separation Request
retaining walls. etc.
$20 For revisions to Plans
Design Review Board.
No F€e
already approved by Planning Staff or the
}r, r!,
F$8ff?'Fgt't' checr Ho.: 6 3c { s'
January 27,2004
Michael Lauterbach
PO Box 3451
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Purchase Residence - Proposed New Single Family Residence
1310 GreenhitlCourULot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Dear Michael,
Town Staff has preliminarily reviewed the application for a new single family residence at 1310
Greenhill Court. Based upon this initial examination, the Department of Community
Development has determined that the application is incomplete and can not be reviewed by the
Town of Vail until all required items have been submitted. The following additional items and
information listed on the accompanying checklist must be submitted.
lf you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me directly al (970) 479-
2128.
uther
nt Review Coordinator
of Vail
Cbn Ly'on
lofrZ
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 faxi 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: PURCHASE - CHG TO APPROVED
Project Description:
Pafticipants:
OWNER Purchase, John & Lara
754 Potato Patch Drive
Vail
co 81657
APPLICANT Michael Lauterbach
Project Address:
Legal DescripUon:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
PO Box 3451
Vail
co 81658
1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL
DRB Number: DR8050315
RELOCATE SOUTH FACING WINDoW; ADD 30 SQ FT GRFA FOR STOMGE OVER GAMGE
07l0r/2005
0710112005
Lot: 17 Block: Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUB.
2103-124-0301-5
see conditions
Location: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Votei
Conditions:
ActionT STAFFAPR
Date of Approvah O7 I 15/2005
Cond: 8
(PI-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $20.00
,r*ffi
Ouino, Exterior Alteratils
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 97O.479.2128 fax: 970.479.2452
ureb: www.vailgov.com
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submifting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
beiign review approval tapses unless a building pegnit is issued and conslrudion commences within
one year of the approval.p.-.--:7 B o4 - orrl
of tlre Request:R-/n..-
Lc-tt l Vo
Q.'q-!.-: :l: . 11-?-le^:Locafion of the Proposah 'Lot:- 4-Block:
PhysicafAddress: (3 /o G
Parcel No.:2t o3 ' t "4 - t or- (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:)
Name(s) of owner(s):\L- f----F._LLJ-
Mailing Address:7{€. >.ulo )./--L J-
Phone;
owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:-q-
(-
Mailing Address:(,9r/z*
Type of Review and Fee:
tr Signs
n Conceptual Review
tr New Constructiontr Addition
tr Minor Alterafon
(mulU-family/commercial)
tr Minor Alteration
(single-fam ily/duplex)
tr/ Changes to Approved Plans
D Separation Request
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild'
$300 tur an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 addiuons & interior conversions)'
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting. window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as'
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
No Fee
For Office Use Only:
Fee Paid: 2A -o O
o*r*"., D/2,406 oi\(
Jun ?9 o5,1 1:25a l"{ichael Lauterbaoh 9"o "z|*ot: , fi ,
,.,
,,iur1"4,,&*^
. \ ,, q[-ee'(laPt'da- )
(..-)'aD- "
MJL DEVELOPMENT INC.
PO BOX 5026
EDWARDS, COLOMDO 81632
oFFlcE (9701 926-4007
FAX (970) 926-4011
MOBILE (97O) 471 -1670
M FMORANDI IM
TO: MATT CENNETT
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNtTy DE)ELOqMENT
MICHAEL J. LAUTERBACH ,KFROM:
DATE: JUNE 28, 2005
RE: PURCHASE RESIDENCE
I3I O GREENHILL COURT, PERMIT # BO4-OI I 1
PACES: -:S--INCLUDING COVER
Pursuant to our recent framing inspection, the inspector has identified several
matters which require attention prior to proceeding with construction on the above
referenced residence. To proceed, we need either Design Review Board approval, staff
approval, or staff confirmation that additional GRFA is available.
First, above the entryway, a storage closet was enclosed below the roofline. The
area has a ceiling height of 5' 4" and a floor dimension of 5' x 5' which results in our
request for approval of this space and of thirty square feet of additional GRFA.
Second, the window on the south side of the kitchen nook which is located above
the desk was moved approximately four feet to the east as shown on southeast
elevation attachment. We are seeking approvaf for this change.
Third, at the lower garage level and with the approval of the additional north
garage bay, we have added a window opening on the north elevation as shown on
northwest elevation attachment and which is located immediately below the north
window in the second floor study. Additionally, we have located a window opening on
the east elevation wall as shown on noftheast elevation attachment and immediately
(t f- -q"-
Jun 29 O5 .1 I : 25a l'lichael Lauterbacho 9?O 926-+011 p."
below the east window located in the second floor study. We are seeking approval to
install windows of the same size and mullion pattern as the overtread windows in both
of these framed openings.
As we have been issued a Stop Construction order by the frarning inspector untll
these items are approved, I am requesting your assistance with the timely approval or
denlal of these items. Please af so let me know if you require further information
regarding these items prior to staff or Design Review Board consideration. Thank you
in advance for your asslstance with these items.
PLEASE INITTAL AND DATE HERE -_---------- AND FAX TO SENDER TO CONFIRM RECEIPT
DELIVERY ADDRESS: 854 BEARD CREEK TRAIL, EDWARDS, COLORADO 8I632
P.3Jun 29 O5 11:26a Hichael Lauterbacha 9?O 926_-40I 1
)
fs/l
/*/$
lrl(to
u
(
/Et/
,/
/
/rT
,/ s$
/ , rowru oF vAtl' / oElldr.r neVrew/ stnrr APPRovAL \7lr/r , \\
STAFF:
Jun 29 O5'1 l:26a H i chae Lauterbach 9?O 926-.+O11
o11 P.5;l
I
I
I
I
I
ts
\.-
s
\
\N
h-
\t
\
h
os
\
7 /rt
ElEl
I
I
I
6 -.+o9?O 92Jun 29 OS ,11:27a M i cha Lauterbachelo
I
I
l
I
I
*t*t*****++tat*****lt++******++******++++tt*t++t++attf**aaa++*f++**++++*+++++++t+++fa+++++f,+
TOWN OF VAIL, COIORADOCopy Reprinted on 07-01-2005 at ll:46:53 O'l/Ol/2005
Statement
* * t + | + + * * * * + + + + + t * * * * * * * +t+'t****++{'+**+*t*tt+|!*+***********t* ******** *+i* * * * * t * t + * * t t + + + + + ++
SCaeemenc Nudber: R050000994 Anount.: $20.00 07/OL/zoosI1 :45 AIvl
Payment Metshod: Check Init: L,C
Notation: *7620/MIC]HAE,I'
I,AIITERBACH/MiIL DEV ' IJ
Permit No: DR8050315 Type: DRB-Chg to Appr Plans
Parcel No: 2103 - 124 - 0301- 5Site Addrees: 1310 GREENHILL SMILLocation: 1310 Greenhill Court, VaiI, CO
Total Feea: 520.00This Palment: $20.00 Total ALL Pmta: $20.00Balance: 50.00***+****lt*+*+f***t****+++*****+++++t*ati*t++***atttt***it***+++*+*+***t*****t**l+*f*++++*+*
ACCOI,]NT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Currene Pmt.E
DR OO1OOOO3TL22OO DESIGN RE\,ITEW FEES 20.00
I0l,[Nm
5*ffi7*),.,si&
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970'479'2139 fax: 97O.479'2452
web: www.ci,vail.co'us
ProjectName: PURCHASECHANGE DRBNumber: DR8050226
Project Description:- RNAL APPROVAL FOR A CHANGE TO THE APPROVED PI-ANS. MINOR ADJUSTMENTSTO GRFA.
Participants:
OWNER Purchase, John & Lara 05125/2005
754 Potato Patch Drive
Vail
co 81657
APPLICANT Michael Lauterbach 0512512005
PO Box 3451
Vail
co 81658
proiect Address: 1310 GREENHILL CT VAIL Locationl 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO
Legal Description: Lot: 17 Block Subdivision: GLEN LYoN SUB'
Parcel Number: 2103-124-0301-5
Comments: seeconditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action; STAFFAPR
Second By;Vote: DateofAPProval:0512612005
Conditionsr
Cond: 8
(pLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
C.ond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued toward completion'
Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paidl $20.00
,*m#'''*,***Hfu,#-
web: www.vailgtov.com
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted unul all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the apprcval.
Description of the Request:
Location of the Proposalz Lot: 17 ebck:- SuMivision:
Physical Address:/g r o (7.-=---, /,;rf Cf . rl.-t
parcef No.r 2lo3 t>la3ot{(@ntact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:7u
Name(s) of Owner(s):d,t ,-- {- l-2."- bu--Lu-
Mailing Address:).*c br U.'l
Phone:t6-3cle
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicanh , 'c-l -.--/e-c- L
Mailing Address:)oB "1r- -.--1.
E-mail Addrcss:
a
6vlo
N
r\loType of Review and Fee:
D Signs
n Conceptual Review
O New Constructiontr Addition
tr Minor Alteration
(multFfamily/commercial)
$s0
No Fee
$6s0
$300
Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
Consbuction of a new building or demo/rebuild,
An addition where square footage is added to any residental or
commercaal building (includes 250 addltions & interior conversions).
Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining wallt €tc.
Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
Revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design
Review Board.
D Minor Alteration
(singfe-famfly/duph{
I
E/cfra4ges to Approved Plans
tr separiiion Request
$2s0
$'0
.E2o
No Fee
For Office Use Only:i# rI,ii-jZE -r" ct ".r *Zl€By:
y't,/,-&.1
Meeting Date:
Planner:
DRBNo.: DR-BOSOZ,z6L- r{- o 5-
no.r?o q- oo(3
TO: MATT CENNETT
TOWN OF VAIL
MTCHAEL J. LAUTERBACH
PO BOX 5026
EDWARDS. COLORADO 8I632
oFFfcE (970) 926-4007
FAX (970) 926-401r
MOBf LE (970) 471-1670
MEMORANDUM RHGffiiVED
APR Z b 21]05
TCV-C0M.DEV.
7gy6 g oot 3
FROM: MICHAELJ. LAUTERB A,,
7(DATE: APRIL 25, 2005
RE: PURCHASE RESIDENCE
I3I O GREENHILL COURT
BUILDINC PERMIT # BO4-OI I I
John and Lara Purchase have asked me to seek approval for the addition of GRFA
for the following items on the above referenced residence. Per the enclosed reduced
drawings, on page A-1, they would like to separate the elevator foyer from the garage
area, on page A-2, they would like to finish the storage space and use it for storage,
and, on page A-4, they would like to create and finish some attic space.
Thank you in advance for considering their request and please let me know if
you require additional information to process their request.
oo
\>'
TOWN OF liA'I
DESIGN R[\,/IE\A'
STAFF. APi.;-,.jVAL
F.\l-3a\ ,
ris fi
_------------.-_
o
d
I
\
Eo
o
I
F
E
z
FI
F]lr'l
7'r Q
oh
>fi
=----/-\yl
,-,$ r€*q+\l or ,ir, llDi:l r ;. .,[!1/
3I'$*$$. \fIHI
dt
{
\-
v I.s ba@ iB'igIlq,\I \i"I\
-t-
L't
Jr
I
I
..,,|
I
I
t9
tl
T
I
OF VAIL
IGN REVIEW
F APPROVAL '\
DE
s14
rni\'l_ ,e<- tf, --+lfr_ --J IIIF ii3 2Er-+11l\lz
},_r_re|
' -'-
<-- i --'->'F-i
o
|II
x
STog
I
ti
I
I
I
ri"l-
I
I
I
I
I
l\
I
I
i
I I
I
I
I
<-t -t
e'fl5@ Ir\X
*3
_ __-_r 6<- I? -->
-"r
tE-ih
i
I
-F
****lfl*t**+ttalataaaaa**fafaaa*****+++ftt**t+tt*t+tla+++*+rat++++++++*ttirtfrrrr+a*+++++++*
TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Statco€Nrt
+ta+ft'}'}aflltltltlat*++**latttaa*****flfffffllaalltafa*'}'l*l*t+*l|ri*l}**ftl**a*al'*itttl+{'+l+++t
Statenent Nunber: R0500006?9 Amount: 920.00 OS/25/2OOSOT:32 AIr{
Payment Method: Check InLt: iIS
Notsation3 7500/MICIiAEIJ
LAUTERBACH
Permit No: DR8050225 Type: DRB -Chg to Appr Plan8
Parcel No: 2103 -124 -0301-5SiIe Addreee: 1310 GREENHIIJIJ ET VAILIJocation: 1310 Greenhill Court, Vail, CO
Total Feeg: $20.00Thie Palment: $20.OO Total ALIJ EmtE: $20.00Balance: $0.00
'ia'}'}fl**aa**l+**+*+ttataa**a**+*+**++tft'tllal*a*tll't'at'}tff'.'3'lt+r+lltt+a*+**+*********+l'l*lli
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Degcription Current Pmts
DR 001000031t2200 DEsreN REutstf FEES 20.00