HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC040074/6T t ~btu ,/:-;:;
V~Dj(.6 '::;'h tJ>l..'--I
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Deve lopment
75SouthFrontageRoad,Vail,Colorado81657
tel :970.479.2139 fax:970.479.2452
web :www.o.veu.co.us
Project Name:STEP HANOFFRESIDENCE
Project Description:
sm COVERAGE VARIANCE
Participants:
PEe Number:PEC040074
OWNER SfEP HANOFF,ROBERT A.MICHA10/25/2004Phone :39 0-4529
POBOX 4573
VAll
CO8 1658
Ucense :
APPUCANT RKD ARCHITECTS10/25/2004Phone :970 -926-2622
POBOX5055
EDWARDS
CO81 632
license :
Project Address:2339 CHAMONIX LN VAIL Location:
Legal Description:Lot:11 Block:A Subdivision:VAlLDAS SCHONE FIL 1
Parcel Number:210311401010
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By :Kjesbo
Second By:Lamb
Vote :7·0
Conditions:
Action:APPROVED
Date of Approval:11/22/2004
Cond :8
(PLA N):Nochanges toth ese plans may be made without t he written consentof Townof
Vailstaff and/or t he appro priatereviewcomm ittee(s).
Cond:300
PEe app roval sha ll not be notbecome v alid for20daysfo llowing the date of
a pproval.
Cond:CON0006820
Thi sva riancereques t a pproval shallbecon ti ngent upon th eapplican t receiv ing Town
of Va il a pprova l of t herelateddesignrevi ew applica tion.
Planner:Bill Gi bson PEe Fee Paid :$500.00
•
T O:Pla nning andEnvironmental Com mission
FROM :Community Development Department
DATE :November 22,2004
S UBJE CT:A request fo r a fi nal reviewo f a va riance,f rom Sec tion 12-6 D-9,S ite
Cove ra ge,Vail T own Code.p urs uan tto Chapter 12-7,Varia nces .Va i l
T own Code,toa llow for a r es identia la ddition loca te d at 233 9Cham o nix
La ne/Lot 11,Blo ck A.Vai l Da s Schone F ilin g 1 ,an d s ett in g f orthde tai lsin
regardt h ereto .
Ap plicant:
Pl a n ner :
I.SUMMARY
R obertStep ha nafl',represent edby R KD Architects
B ill G ibson
Th e a pplican t,R obertStep hanoff,re prese nted by R KDAr c hitects,is reque stin g
a va r iance f romSectio n 12-6 D-9,Site Cove rage ,Va il T o w n Co de,to a llow f o r a
residential add ition ,locatedat 2339Chamo nix Lane .Based upon Staffs rev ie w
of thecriteriain Section V III ofthis memora nd um an d theevidence an d
testimony presented,theCommunity Development Department recommen ds
de nial of this v ariance requestsubj ect to t he findings noted in Section IXo fthis
memorandum.
II.DES CRIPTIONO FREQUEST
T he a pplica ntis proposing areno vation to an e xis tingsingle-family residence
w ith a one-carga rage,originally constructe d in 1979,locatedat 2339 Cha monix
Lane .A vicinity ma pha sbeen attachedfor reference (Attachmen tA).The
ex istinglotis non -conforming in rega rdtoth e Town'sminimum lot sizestand ards
an d thestructu re isnon-conformin qinregard tot heTow n'sengi neering
standa rds ford riveways .T his e xis ting househas 760sq .ft.of gross reside ntial
floo r area (4,159 sq .ft.allowed),4 90 sq .ft .of gar age(600 sq .It.allowed)w hich
create 1,290sq .ft.o f site cov erage(1 ,808 sq.ft..allowe d),and includesatwo-car
garage.
T heproposedre novation includes a new driveway ,two-car g arageaddition ,
enclosedentryway addition ,d ining/livingroom ad dition,a nda n upper level
expansion (maste rbedroom,bedroom2 ,bath 2,and office).Thisproposal will
invo lve lowerin g (hefront on e-thirdof the exis ting building byconverting the
existinggarage intocrawlspace a ndan enclosed e ntry .A newtwo-car garage
will then beattachedto the front of theex isting st ructure.Additions tot heupper
level of the struct ure arealso proposed .T hepropose d renovation w ill crea te a
total of3,0 1gsq.ft .ofGFRA (4 ,159 sq .ft .allow ed ),540sq .ft.of garag e area(600
sq.ft.allowed),and 2,071 sq .ft.ofsite coverage (1 ,808 sq.ft,allowe d).T he
applicant's request andproposed a rchitectural plans have been attac hedfor
reference (Attac hmentsB and C).
Theprovrstons ofSection 12-17,Varian ce.Vail TownCode.de termine t he
rev iewc riter ia a ndreviewp rocedures fo r ava riance request
III .BACKGROUND
The e xistingreside nce located at2339Chamo nix Lanewasoriginally
constructed i n1979 under EagleCountyj urisd iction andtodayislega lly non-
conforming inr egardtothe Town'smin im um lotsize standards an d t hestructure
isnon -confo rm ingi n regard to t he Town'seng inee ring standardsfo r d riveways.
The appl icants'proposal was conceptually reviewedbythe Design Review Bo ard
at itsNove mbe r 3,2004.pub lic h earing .Interms of a rchitecture and aesthetics ,
the Design ReviewBoa rd wasgenera lly support ive of applicant's proposa l.
Should the PlanningandEnvironmental Commissionch oose toapprove this
varia nce request.theassociat eddesign reviewapplicat ion wil l be te ntat ively
scheduledfo r final rev iew by the DesignReview Board atitsDecember 1,2004 ,
.publ ic hearing .
Staff hasresear ched other sitecove rage varia ncereq ue stsinordertoprov ide
the Planning a nd Envi ronmentalCom mission with additional backgrou nd
inform ation.Asummaryoftha tresearch isprovid ed below:
Forst!R esidence,(Octobe r 2004)
At theFo rstl Reside nce ,the applicantreque stedandwasgrantedasite
cove ragevarian ce of5.97%(341 sq.ft .)on a lotof only5,706 sq .ft.Theexisti ng
home hadnogarageand thepropo sedsite cove rage va riance facilitated the
construction o f a newone-s tory,two-c ar ga rage.
Houtsma Re sid en c:~,(July 2003 )
At the Hou tsmaRes idence,the a pplicant requested end was gran ted a site
cove rage vari anceof 1.5%(162 sq.ft.).The site had excess ive slopes a nd was
limited to 15%sitecover age per theTow n's Haza rdRegulations.T hisvaria nce
fa cilitated theco nstructionofa new on e-story.two-cargarage.
Ricci Reside nce,2576 Davos T rail (F e !l [u a ry ~~9 95 t AttheRicci Residence ,the
appl ica nt requ ested asitecove rage variance for 4 .7%(526.5 sq .ft .ofadditio nal
sitecov erage).The appli cantproposedtousethe additional sitecoverage to
create anenlarg ed two-car garage ,aswe ll a sadda small a mount ofadd itio nal
GRFAto theexisting reside nce.
Dea n/Rausch Res iQ ~Qf.e ._~9.42 _B_e!!.now e r (Ju ly 1993t At the DeanlRousch
reside nce,th e applicants request ed a 3.56%sitecoverage variance (287 sq .It.),
a setbackvaria nce (4 feet intoa20-foo t se tback),andawall heightvariance.
T he request for site coverageandwallheightvarianceswereapproved bythe
PEC,butthesetbackvariance for GRFAwa s denied .Itshou ld be noted tha l the
staffrecommended de nia l of thevariances,but thePECappr oved it.The i nterior
dimen sionsofthe garagewere 22.5 by22 .5 feet,andthe areaof thegarage
calc ulated forsite coveragewas 576 squarefeet.
2
•
•
,
Tay lor Residence .2409Chamoni x Road (May 1993 ):Atthe Taylorresidence,
the a pplica n t reques ted a nd wasgr anted asite coverage variancefo r1.3%(122
squarefee t)in o rder toco nstruct agarage and buildi ng co nnection onthe
p roperty.It sho uldbenoted that theall owedsite c overageonth islotis20 %(no t
15%).and theapp l icant wasalsogranted a variancetoconstru ct thegarage in
t he f ront set back (thes tope onth is lo t did notex ceed30%).The a pproved
i nterior dimensionsofthe two-car garagewere 21 feet by 20 feet ,foratotal
i nte rior areaof 420 sq.ft..T he garage co ntributed 462sq.ft .toward site
coverage .
MummaRes idence,1886West GoreCreek Drive (February 1993):Atthe
Mummaresidence ,theapplicantrequestedand w asg ranted a 1%sitecoverag e
varian ce in order toconstru cta garagead ditionon a lot tha i ex ceeds30%slop e.
The1%overage o n site cove rage amou ntedto approximate ly99 squa re fee t.
The interiordimensi ons oftheapprovedgaragemeasure 20fe et by20 feet,for a
totalinterior area of400 squarefeet.The garage co nt ributed 442 squarefe et
towa rd site coverage.
Or der of Rev iew :Gene rally ,a pplicationsw ill be reviewedfi rst bythe
Planning andEnvironm ental Com mission for acce ptabili ty ofuse andth en by the
Des ign Review Boa rd fo r c ompliance of proposed buildi ngsandsite planning.
Planning and Environmental Commiss ion:
Action:Th ePlan ning a ndEnvironmentalCommis sion is responsible for final
a p pro val/denia l/a pproval w ith c onditio ns ofavaria nce.
Th ePlanning and EnvironmentalCo mmiss ion is responsiblefor
evaluating aproposal fo r.
1.Relationsh ip and impac t of the useo n develo pmentobjectives ofthe
T own.
2 .Effectoftheuse o nlightandair,di stri but ion of population,
transportat ion faci l ities,utilities,schools,parksand recreationfacilit ies ,
andothe r publicfacil ities and public facilitiesneeds.
3.Effect upo n traffic,w ithpartic ular referen ce to congestion,a utomotive
a ndpedestrian safety and co nvenience,traffic nowand co ntrol,access,
maneuverability,and removal ofsnowf rom the streetsandpar king areas .
4 .Effectuponthe character of Ihe area in wh ich the proposeduse isto
be located,includ ingthescal e a ndbulkofthepr oposeduse inrelation to
surrou nding uses.
5 .Such ot herfactors and crite ria as theCommissio n deemsappl icable to
theproposeduse.
6.The env ironmentalimpac treport concern ing theproposeduse,if an
environ mental impact report isrequired by Cha pter 12 of this T itle.
3
Co nformance wit hde velopmentsta ndards of zo nedi strict
Lotarea
Setbacks
Building Height
Density
GRFA
Sitecove rage
Landscape are a
Parkin gan d loading
M itigation ofdevelopmentim pacts
Desig nRev iewB oard:
A ction:Th e Design Review Board has NOre viewauthority on ava riance,b ut
m ust rev iew anyacco mpanying Desig nReviewBoa rd a pplication.
Tow nC ounc il:
Actio ns ofDesignRev iew Boa rd or Pla nning a nd Environmenta l Co mmissio n
may beappe aled tothe Tow n Co unci lor bythe TownCounci l.T ownCo uncil
eval uates whether or n otthe P lanning a nd Environme ntalCommissiono rDesign
Review Boarderredwi th app rov als or denialsand canu phold,up hold wi th
m odifications,orover turn t he board's decisio n.
St aff:
T he sta ffis responsible for ensuring t hat allsubm ittal requirementsarep rovided
a nd p lan sconfo rm to thetech nica l r equirementsof t he ZoningReg ulation s.The
staff alsoadvises t he a pplicant astocom pliance wi th thedes ign guidelines.
Sta ffp rovides a staffmemorandumcontai ning bac kground onthe p roperty and
pro v ides a s ta ff evaluat ionoft he pro jectwit h respec t to ther equired c riteria and
find ings,a ndarecommendation o n ap prova l,approvalwi th co ndi tions ,ordenial.
Staff also f acilitates the review process.
V .AEEb!J<8_BL E PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff bel ieves t hat t he following prov isio ns of theVa ilTownCo de a re relevantto
the review ofthisproposal :
T ITLE12:Z ONING REGULATIONS
C hapter 12·60:Two-FamilyPrimary/Secon dary Residential (PIS)District
12-60-1 :Purpose :The two-family primary/secondary residentia l district is
intended to provide sitesfo r single-famify reside ntial usesor two-family
res idential usesinwhich one unit is a larger primary residence a nd theseco nd
unit is a smaller caretaker apartment,together withsuch public facilities as may
appropriatefy be located inthesame district.The two-family primary/secondary
residential district is intended toe nsure adequate lig ht,air,p rivacya nd open
spaceforeac h dwelling,commensurate withsingfe ·family and two-family
occupancy,andto maintain the desirable residentia l qualities of suchsites by
establishing appropriate site development standa rds.
Chapter 12-17 :Varia nces
12-17-1:Purpose :
4
A.Reasons For SeekingVariance:In ordertoprevent orto l essensuchp ractical
difficulties andunnece ssary physicalhardshipsinconsistent withtheobje ctivesof
this title as wouldres ult from strict or literalinterpre tation and enforcemen t,
variances from certain regulatio ns may be granted.A pra ctical diffic ulty or
unnecessary physical hardshipmayresultfrom thesize,shape,or dimensionsof
a siteorthe l ocationof existing structuresthereon;from topographi c or physical
conditionson the s ite or intheimmediate vicinity;or from other physical
limi tations,street locati onsor c onditionsinthei mmediatevi cinity.Cost or
inco nvenienceto theapplicant of strict or literal compliancewith a reg ulation
sh all notbe a rea sonfo rgranting a variance.
VI ,S IT E A NALYSI S
A dd ress:23 39ChamonixLa ne
Lega l Descripti on:Lot 11,Block A ,Va il dasSc hone 1 ~1 Filing
Zoning:Two -F amily Pr imary/Secondary Residentia l
Land UsePla n Designation :Medium Dens ity Re sidentia l
Current LandUse :Residentia l
LotA rea:9,042 sq.ft .(0.21a cres)
Hazards:Medi um Severity Rockfall
Development Standard Al lowed/Reg uired Pro.Q osed
Setbacks:
Fr ont:2 0'2 5'
W es t Side :15 '15 '
East Side:15'19'
Re ar:15'18'
De nsity :1 unit s +1 Type IEHU 1 u n it
GRFA :4,159 sq .ft.3 ,277s q.ft .
SiteCoverage:1,808sq .ft .(20%)2 ,071 s q .It.(23%)
Landscape A rea:5,42 5sq.ft.(60%)6,328sq.ft.(7 0%)
Parking:3sp aces 3s paces(2e nclosed)
VII.SURROUNDING LANDUSE S ANDZON ING
Nort h:
Sout h:
East:
Wes t:
C urrentLand Use
Re sidential
Res identia l
Res identia l
Residentia l
Zo ning
Tw o -Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Two-Fa milyPri mary/Seco n dary Reside ntial
Tw o-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
VIII.CR ITEBIA A ND FINDlNGl?
The rev iewc riteria fo ra r eque stofth is naturea re esta blishedbyC hapter 12 -1 6,
Va il Town Code.
5
A .Considerationof F a c!ors_~~ga rd in g the Set ba.ck V ariances:
1.Th e relationship of the requ ested v ariance to other exi sting or
potential u ses and structure s in the vicinity .
As pro posed ,the ce ntersectionof this structure (p roposed kitchen
area)does "step-down"in compariso n to the existing structure.
A lthough thecurren t proposal does utilize a ll of the sites availab le
GRFA o rbuilding heig ht;th is does notpreventa future renovation
from maximizin gthe se twodevelopmentstandards .'rh eretore..
Staff believes the granting of a site cover age variancewo uld a llow
for theco nstruction of buildingbulk a nd mass that ex ceeds wh at
w ouldotherwise beallowed bythe zon ing regu lations.
2.Thed egree to which r elief f rom the strict and literal
interpretation and enforcement of a s pecifiedregulation i s
neces sary to achieve c ompatibility and uniformity of
treatm ent among sites inthe vicinity or t o attain th e
o bjectivesof this ti tle w i thout a grant o f s pec ial privilege.
Thisvariance request isa ssociatedw itha remodelofanexisting
res idence o riginally co nstructed i n1979.T heexis ting residence is
anon-confonningst ructure i n regardto the provisionso fthe
Town'sdrivewaysta ndards.Theapp licant is proposing a
renovation thatwill bring thi sstr uct urei nto co mpl iancew iththe
Tow n'sdriveway standards;however,t hisproposal exceeds the
maximum allowable site coveragefor t hesite.A lthough the
applicantis pro posing to remedy an ex istingnon-conforming
situat ion,a newdeviationfrom the T own Code wi ll be created .
Alt ho ughthe Planning a nd Environmental Commiss ion has
previously held thatconstructiono f as tructureprior tothe
adoption ofthe current zo ning regu lat ions may beabasisfor
g ranting a var iancefromthe Town 'scurrent zo ning regulations,
Staffbelieves that designa ltern ativesareavai lab le to the
ap plicant toco nstruct add itions toth is structure wit houtexceeding
thesite coveragestandards.Staffbelieves theonlyelement of
this renovationthat is necessarytoaddr ess theexistingdriveway
non-conformityis thega rage addition.Today there is 5 18 sq.ft.of
unusedsite covera ge avai lab leforarenovationof thisproperty.
Staff believes5 18 sq.ft.isanadequa te amo unt ofsite cove rageto
const ruct anewtwo-carga rage i n compliancew iththe Town's
dr ivewaysta ndards (the TownCode requiresenclosed parking
spacestobe 9'x18 ',which is162sq .ft.,t hus theminimum sizeof
atwo-car gara ge must be324 sq.fl.).Staff doesnot be lieve the
additionalsite coverage sq uare footage crea tedbythe proposed
garagestairs,entry sta irs ,dining room,masterbedroom
expa nsio n,bedroom2ex pansio n,ba th 2expa nsion,and the
officeexpansion is necessaryto remedythe existin g dr iveway
non-conformity.
6
Staff beli eves theap plica nt's proposa l s hould bemod ified to
comply wit h t he site coverage requirementsby r educi ng (o r
eli minating)anyof t he fo llow ingp roposedaddi tions :ga rage ,
garage stai rway,en closed entryway st airs,mast er bedroom,
bedroom2 ,bath 2,office ,or d ining room.
T herefore ,Slaffdoes n ot belie ve the p roposedvaria ncerequest
isthe min imum degreeof relief necessary f romt he st ricta nd
lite ral i nterpretationand enfo rcement of thes ite coverage
r egulations necessa ry to achieve com patibility and u niformity
amo ng sitesinth e vic inityand wit hint he Two-Fami ly
Primary/Secondary Residential (PIS)District.
If theproposal ism odified 10 co mply w ith the Town 'ssitecove raqe
s tandards .nova riances arenecessaryfo r thisp roposed
renovatio n.
3.Theeffect ofth e requested va riance o nli ghta nd air,
distr ibut ion of popu lation,t ran sportation a nd t r affic f ac iliti es ,
pub licf acilities and ut ilities,and p ubl icsa fe ty,
Staff doesnotbelieve thep roposed sitecove rage v ariance will
haveas ignificant neg ativeimp act on t his criterion in compa r iso n
toexisting cond it ions.
4.Su c h other f ac tors and criteria ast he commission deems
applicab l e to th e proposed va ria nce.
B.T he Planning and_Env ironmental Commission sha llmake thefo llowing
fi ndingsJ';lefo re gra n ting .1iI--Y:~.lfia nce :
1.T hat the grantingof the variance w ill n otco nstitute a gran to f
special pr ivilegein consistent wi t h thelimitations on other
p roperties cl assifiedin the same dist rict.
2.T hatthegrantingof t he v ariance will not be detr im ental to t he
pub licheal th,s afetyor we lfa re ,ormaterially injurious t op roperties
o r imp rovementsin t hevic in ity .
3.Thatthevaria nce iswarr a nted for o neor more of thefollowing
reasons:
8 .T hestr ictl iteral i nterpretationore nforcement of the
speci fiedregulation w ould result i np ractical difficulty or
u nnecessaryphys icalhardship inconsistentwi ththe
objec tives ofthis title .
b.T here are except ions o r extraordinaryci rcumstancesor
c o ndit ions app lic able to thesamesiteofthevarianc e tha t
donot apply ge ner allyto other properties in thesame
zo ne.
c.Thest r ict interpretation ore nfo rcement of the spe cified
reg u latio n wo uld de prive t he applica nt of priv ileges
enjo yed bythe ow ners ofothe rp ropertiesin th esame
dis t rict.
7
IX.STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Th eCo mmunity Development Department re com me nds d enial of t h ev ariance
request fromSection 12-60 -9,Site Coverage,Vail TownCode,pursuant to
Chap ter 12-7,Variances,Va il Tow n Code,toallow fora residential addition
loca teda t 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 1 1,Block A,Va il DasSc honeF ili ng 1.Staffs
re co mm e ndationis ba sed upon t he review ofthe c riteria in Section V III o f t his
m emorandumandtheev idence a nd tes timo ny presented.Should t he P lanning
a ndEn vironmentalCo mmissio n choose to d enyt his req uest;t he Comm unity
Development Departmentreco mmends theCommission makethefollowing
f indings:
1.T hatt he g rantingo fthevaria nce w i ll consti tute ag ranting o f s pecial
privilege inco nsistent with thelimitations on otherproperties cl assified in
thesamedi strict.
2.T hat the grantingoft he va riancewill notbedet rimenta l to thepublic
health,safety,orwe lfare.or materially injuri oustoproperties or
improvementsin th evicini ty .
3.Thest rict literalinterpretationore nforcement of thespeci fiedregulation
wo uldnotresu lt in prac ticald ifficultyor unnecessa ry physicalhardship
inconsistent withtheobjectives of thistitle.
4 .Thestrictinterpretationo r en forcement ofthespecifiedregulatio n woul d
not depriveth e applicant ofpriv ilegesenjoyedby theow ners ofot her
properties in thesame distr ict.
Shouldthe Plan ning andEnvironmentalCommissio n choose to a pprovethis
request;theCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentrecommendsthe Commission
makethefotlowinq fin dings:
1.Thatthe gra nting of the va riance will notconstitutea granting of special
privilege i nco nsistentwith the limitations on ot her propertiesclassified in
the samedistrict.
2 .Thatthegranting of theva riance w illnot bedetrimental to th epublic
health,safety ,orwel fare,or materiallyinjurio us topropertiesor
improvements inthevicinity.
3.Thestrict literal in terpretation or enforcemento fthespecified regulation
wo uldresultinpractical difficulty orunnecessary physica l hardship
inconsis tent withthe objectives of this title.
4 .Thestrict inte rpretation o r enfo rcement ofthespecifiedregu lation would
dep rive theapplicant ofprivileges enjoyedbythe ownersofother
properties inthesamedist rict.
8
,
S ho uld the P lanningandEnvironmentalCo mmission choose toapprove this
co nditio nal usepe rmit request,the Community Development Department
recommendsthe followingco nditio ns:
1.Thisva riance request a pproval shall be co ntingent upo n the appl icant
receivingTownofVail approva l ofthe related design reviewapplication.
x.A,,~CHMENTS
A.Vicin ityMap
B.Applicant'sStatement
C.Architectural Plans
D.Architectural Planhig hlightedtoshow proposed site coverage
E.Public Hearing Notice
9
~
Q).o
E
CD>o
Z
111
Uc
CIl ";".'"CI et:-._nI
en""!.~E
...0 E
:::E 0O~()
C U
llll!:,eMa,N
111..
II)
Attachment:A
ba
"
o
I
Attachment:B
Description o fthe Variance r equested for the Stephanoff Residence
Therequest is foravariancefromthe20%site coverag e maximuminthe2
FamilyPrimary/Secondaryzonedist rict.This isa non-conforminglot.Thesquare
foolageis9,041,73 ,TheminimumSquare footagein t hezonedistrictis15,000
squarefeet.Thecurrentgraveldriveisinexcessof 16 %.Themostpracticalway
toresolvethedriveway issue istobuildagarageinfrontoftheexisting slructu re
atanelevationsetforanappropriate drivewayslope.Theresultantgarageslab
wouldbe10feetbelowtheexisting lower level.Wehaveproposedthisgarage
andaheatedentry t hatwill conn ect thehometolhenewgarage.Thenew
constructionwillresolve thedriveway issueandwillcomplywithallotherzon ing
restrictions but ,duetot he smalllotsize,will exceedthe1,808maximumsquare
foo tageby 262square f eet.Theexisting nonconformingdrive/garageandthe
no n-conforming sitecreate asignificantpracticai difficulty.Thestrict
interp retation ofthesitecoveragereguiation wouldpermit only 5 18 a ddiliona l
square feet ,whichisnot sufficient toprovidearequiredtwo-cargarageandan
entry .Th eproposedsitecove rage of2,071 issignificantlyunderthe3,000
squar e feetofsitecoverage ofaconformingminimallot inth is zonedistrict.
T hisvariance will haveno impactontheothere xisting orpotential usesand
structuresinthearea .
By granting thisvariance this homecanbe brought into greater compliance with
t heneighbor hood particularlyin regardstoitsstreet frontage.
T herewillbe noeffec t on t he light,air,d istributionof population,transportation,
t raffic facilities,utilities orpublic safety.
Thisrequestcomp lies withtheintentofthe TownofVailplanningpol icies and
development objectives byupgradingarundownhomeandb ringing a
nonconformingproject intomuchgreater(aithough notcomplete)comp liance.
RKD Architects,Inc.Design and Constr uction
1 ~]M cli n sueer SUI[t"G004 .P.O.8 0 ..S055 .fd wolld,.Co lorado 8 163 1.1(0170)Q16-16 2l .(970]926 9822 fa ..
www.rkdarch.com
~,
,
Attachment:C
..'
~~
I
::F!j
"Ill ~Ir'I"H,dr'Iii'I IIII,f,
,"I ',":i.j1III
~~.
-,
.'.
,
e
"•
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
"s
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~,
o
,'Hi!
"I',.r
i S TEP HANO FFR ES ID EN CE
2339 CHAMON IX LAN E
VAIL ,COLORADO
LO~"."Lo<':><~,..F"".."""",.....".V"''-"""$C"""'_'"'''0 ''''',
..--,,,
!
!
j
I
I !
I.
,,-
'0 c .,)
,
\I ~--]
,,,,,,,
""""""""""",,
,-----
,---,~-..---.---------------L 7)""",----L-,,0:
••!::,
I
~l5 D
---------------:o..t:-,,,,,,,,,,
\,,,,,,
\..-~-~-~_~,:lI~"j;::i'-'J,,,,'9
._--------
,'[::>f l,:/,c,.,~
>
"•
EB,
I
I
-":ll
I
I I !~r~-f'ill i I
./-
IX ""
rz )vi,.'.2--,-
"•2
STE P HI\NOFF RES IDENCE
2 339 C HA MONIX L A NE
V I\IL.C OLORADO
~....,".....oe><A ......-on.o....-0""_......__.........-.0 •
,-"~:J,.,0
~,
•z
:I,.
"1\
-p tl~~-,--"
-;;D!:P-
-"ZS _Ls....---,
--'-'-_.-~=-OR ~._-,
""",""",,-~
---,--,~•
•-~
~
---~-:.._.AlMW'__I _
~g"lm-_~-_.=-_-(-----.
,
",,
...!.h ·-~
S TEP H ANOFFR E SID ENC E
2339 C I I AMO N IX L AN E
V A IL .C O L O R A D O
.01",•.••00:',.,"'"""An...c ....
...,
I I ;•I,,;
:;C:::;-u:..=,
,.
1I !i
'"..'I•I
,-
i
STEPHANOFF RE SIDEN CE
2339 C HAMO N IXL AN E
VAIL ,COLO RADO
•"........0<:............--~....VA .__&<0__."_0.0 1
i,
\
i
(
I
\
\
I
I
\
I
"
I
.,\'
!
/
,,
\,,
!
hi!IillI,I
11
"II
S TEP HANOFF RES IDENCE
;.>339 C HA MO NIX LANE
VAIL ,C OLOR ADO
C,"".~..oe".,"C,>,,,."'¥'SOON"'-...",..C"'.SC''')H~"...,."."0 .'
•
",,,
,
.'
..-'-,
r,
••
:-------------
1fI't/1';~"';7'i:'~";"Ci",,.,...,,",-.-·-,-r-.-1•
••••••••·'••••••••,':',~---~:.·',',',\,
lj
I '11,
I',
Attachm ent:0
•r
3
,,
•~
~•-•~\
8~
T HIS IT EM MA YAF FECTYOURPRO PERTY
PUBLI C NOT ICE
*
Atta chment :E
roWN~
NOT ICE IS HEREBY GIVEN t hatt hePlanni ng andEnvironme ntal Co mmi ssio n of the T ow n o f
V ailo n No ....e m be r 22,2 004 ,at 2 :00 PM in t he Town of V a il M u nicipa l Building,in cons ide ration
of :
A r eq uestfo r f inal r eview o f a major e xterior alter ation ,pu rsu ant t oSectio n 1 2 ~7 A -2 ,Ext er io r
A lte ratio ns o rM odificat ions,Vai l Tow nCo de ,and a va ria nce fromSect io n 1 2 ~7 A ~7 ,Height,Vail
Town Code ,t o a llow for revisions t ot hep rev io usly approved develo pment p lan f orO ne Wi llow
Bridge Road(p rev iously Swiss Chale t),locate d at 100 Wi llowB ridgeRo adfT r acts K&L,Block
5E ,Va il V illag e Fi rst F iling ,a ndse tting fo rth d etails in rega rd t hereto .
Applicant:OneWi llow Brid ge Road,represented byReso rtDesign ,Inc.
Planner :George Ru t her
A request fo r areco mmendat io nt o t heVa il Tow n Co u ncilof pro pose d t ex t a mendmentst o
Sect ion 12-3-3(E),Ap pea l of Tow nCo u ncil Decisions ;a nd s etting fo rthde tailsin rega rd t h er eto .
App licant:TownofVai l,r ep r ese ntedb y M a tt M ire
Plan ner:G eorge Rut her
A req u estfo r afina lrev iewo f av ariance ,fr omSec tion 12-6 G~8 ,DensityCon t rol,V a il Tow n
C ode ,pu r s uant t oC hapte r 12 -7 ,Va riances,Vail TownCode,toa llowfor a ddit ional g ross
residential floo r a rea a nd dwellin g u nit ,locatedat46 90 Vail Racq u et C lub Driv eNa il Ra cque t
Clu b Co ndos ,and sett in gf orth d e t ail in regard t hereto.
A pp licant :RacquetC lubOw ners Associa tion,r epresentedbyTRD Architects
Planner :MattGen nett
Arequestfor fin a l r eviewofa Co ndition al Use Pe rmit ,pu rsuant t oSec tio n 12-6 0-3 ,C ondi tiona l
Uses,Va il Tow n Co de,toa llow for a Ty pe II Employee Hou s ing Unit,loca te dat4812Me adow
Lane/Lo t 8 ,Block7 ,Big h o r n F ifth A ddition,and sett ing forth d etails in re gar d the reto.
A pplica nt:Big ho rn LL Candt he Dua ne F.RogersRevo cab leTrust ,rep resentedby Larry
Be nw ay
Pla nn er :Bill Gi bson
Areq ue stforr evisiont ot h e fin al pl at,pu rsuant to Ch apte r 1 3 ~4 ,M inorSu bd ivision,Va il Tow n
Code ,t o all owfor add itio na l g ross residentia l fl oorarea,locat ed at 1094 Riva Gl en/Lo t4 ,
Spraddle C ree k Estates ,an d setting f o rt hdeta ils in r eg a rdt hereto .
Applica nt:W&8 Develo pment,LL C ,re pres e nte dby Tim L osa ,Ze hren a nd Associa tes ,In c.
Plan ner:M attGe nnett
Areques tf ora fin alrev iew of ava riance,f romSect ion 12-6 0 -9,Site Coverage,Vai l Town
Cod e ,purs ua ntt o Chapter 12-7 ,V a ria nces,V ailTow n C ode,t oa llow fo ra re s ide nt ialaddition
loca ted a t2339C hamonix La ne/Lot 11,Block A ,Vai l Da s Sc hone Filing 1,and setti ng fo rt h
details in rega rd the ret o .
Applicant:Robert Stepha noff,r epresented byJackS now ,RK D Archi tects
Planner:Bill G ibso n
Thea pplicatio n sand in fo rmationa bo ut t he proposals a re availab le for p ublic inspec t io nd uri ng regula r
offic eho ursat t h e Tow n o f Vai l Co mmunity Develo pment De p artment,7 5Sout h Front ageRo ad.The
pu blic is invited to attend project or ient ationa ndthes ite v isits that precede t he pu blic h earing int he
Townof Vai l Co mmunityDevelo p ment Depa rt ment.Please c a ll (970)4 79 ~2 1 38 foradd itio nal
informatio n.
Sign languageint erp retation isa vailable upo n req ue st w ith 24~hour n otificatio n.Ple aseca ll
(97 0)47 9 -2356 ,Teleph o ne f orthe Hearing Im paire d ,fo r info rmat ion.
Published ,November5 ,2004 ,in theVa il Daily.
PropertyOw ners ad jacent tothe sub ject propcr"':2339 Cha mo nix Lane,Vuil
1.\"'edel Enterpris es
P.O.Box388
Edwards,CO81632
2.David G.H ilb
1592Matte rhorn C i rcle
Va il,CO 81657
3 .Abby S.Sc hwartz
668F lagst aff Dr.
Cinci nnati ,011 45215
4.BertV.S.&Glenda L.Wong
40 Bertba C i r.
C olorado S prings,C O 80906
5.Townof Vail
75S.Fro ntage Hd .
Va il,C O81 657
Physical Address:23 78 Garmi seh Drive,Vail
Lega l Descr iption :Townhouse Site 3
Su b:VailDasScho ne Filing2
BLK:G
LOT:10
Physicu l Address :2358Garmise h Drive,Vai l
Legal Description.Sub:Va il Das Sc hone Filing 2
ULK :G
LOT:11
Physical Address :23-49 C hamonixRd.,Va il
Lega l Descripti on:S ub:Va il D~ls Sch one Filing 1
BLK:A
LOT:12
Physical Address:232 C hamonixRd .,Vail
Leg al Descripti on:S ub:Vail Das Schon eFiling 1
BLK:A
LOT:10
Physical Address:2310Cha munix Rd.,Va il
Legal Description:Sub:Va il DasSc hone Filin1=:1
P arcel n R esult Trac tD
Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission
Department o f Community Development
75 South Frontage Road,Vail,Colorado 8 1657
tel :970 .479.2139 fax:970.4792452
web:www.vailgov .com
General I nform ation :
All projects requiringPlanningand Environmental Commission review m ust receive a pproval prior 10sUbm itting a
bu ilding permit application .Please refer tothe subminal requirements for the particular approval thai is requested .
An application forPlanni ng and Environmental Commission review cannot b e accepted until eu requ ir edinformation
is received bytheCommunity Development Department.The proect may alsoneedto be reviewed bytheTown
Counciland /or the Design Review Board .
Type of Application a ndFee :
•Rezoning $1300 •Conditional Use Permit $650
•fo.1ajor SubdivisiorJ $1500 •Fk:lodplain Modification $400
•MinorSubdivis ion $650 •M inor Exterior Alte rat ion $650
•Exemption Plat $650 •Major Exterior Alteration $800
•Minor Amendment toan SOO $1000 •Development Plan $1500
•New Specia l Developme nt District $6000 •Amendment 10 a Development Plan $250
•Majo r Amendment 10 an Soo $6000 •ZOn ing Code AmElf"lCinent $1300
Major Amendmenttoan 800 $1250 •Variance a1&KD
(no exterior modificatiOnS)•Sign Variance $200
Desc ription of th e Req u est:"""·It<:.CDv~r:::-WiANG@'
o z
Loca tion of the Proposal:Lot :lL Block :_~_$Ltx:l ivision:~P:2 ,VD..c;,~I
Physical Address:Z.~~q1~·,l(W
010\0
Parcel No .:~'O_~_:.J !':1'~o-(ContactEagle Co .Assessor at970-328-8640 fo r parce l no .)
Zoning:z.'&''''''~~~
NameCs)of Owner(s)::iOlek %;=~_
Mailing Address:=:~~.~Io~~~~~;~
Own er(s)Si gnature(s}:""'1-""-=-"'-''-''''''s,,...!::::....---::::::...--'------------
Nam e o f Applicant:1Z.K.O A.1i?J;..~l1Ef.T':::t -~e.c..k.~N",~
"l .zc.,-7.C;7.t:
~~~
Mailing Add ress:----'f-'-"'-'''''-~--.:;===--''"'''=='''''"''_::_c_,__---,---=-----~
________________Phon e:'l«.z.::."z c:.
E-mail Address:~i?12A e.~H ,'"et'4Faxi ---'12.""-...::l-'L"-''''--_
Prolect No .:
Ie l lel By:Cl.a \(\"'-~:\Y -V(j ,6 -.Jv<c
PECNo.:f E.d 1-oC>¥{
For Office lJs..8 On)Y:
Fee Paid:'S CO .Check No,:
Meel ;ngDale:1\1p..\~
Planne r:
Page t of 6-04/01104
RECV OCT 2 5 2D D4
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
TOWN OF vx n ,COI.oRA.DO Stat ement
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Statement Number :
Payment Method :
CONSTRUCT ION,IN C.
R040006974
Check
Am o unt:$5 0 0.0 0 10 !2 5 !20 0403 :40 P M
I nit :LC
No t at i on :#1849 !COL
Perm it No:
Pa r ce l No:
Si te Add ress :
Loca tion :
PEC040 074 Type:PEe -Variance
2 10 3 11 40 10 10
233 9 CHAM ONIX LN VAIL
2 339 CHAMONIX LANE
This Payme nt :$500.00
Total Fee s:
T otal ALLP mts :
Balan ce:
$500 .00
$5 00 .0 0
$0 .0 0
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ACCOUNT ITE MLI ST :
Account Code
PV 00 1000031 1250 0
Descr ipti on
pre APP LICATI ON FEES
Cu rrent Pm ts
500 .00
Descript ion o f t he Va ri ance r equested f or th e Stepha nolf Res idence
Therequestis fora variance fromthe20%sitecoverage maximuminthe2
Fam ily Primary /Secondary zonedistrict.Th isisa non-conforming lot.Thesquar e
footageis 9,041.73 .The minimumSquarefootageinthezoned istrict is15 ,000
sq uaref eet.Th ecu rrent grave l driveis in exc essof16 %.Themostpract ical way
to resolve the d rivewayissueis to buildagaragein f rontof the existi ng structure
atane levation set fora n appropriate driveway slope .Th e resultantga rage sla b
wo uldbe 10 feetbe low the existi nglower level.W ehave proposed th is garage
a ndahea ted entrytha t will con ne ct thehometo th enewga rage.Th enew
co nstructionwillreso lve the driveway issuea nd will co mply witha ll otherzoning
restrictionsbut.duetot he small lotsize ,will exceedthe 1,808m aximum square
footage by262 s quarefee t.Th ee xisting nonco nform ing d rive/garage andthe
non-conforming sitecreateas ignificant practical d ifficulty.T he strict
interpretationofthesite cove rage regulationwou ld permit o nly518 a dditional
s quarefeet ,whi chis not suffi cientto provid e arequ iredtwo-ca r garageandan
e ntry.Th e proposedsite coverageof2,071 issignificantl y under the3,000
s quarefeet of s ite coverage of aconform ing min imal lotinthis zone district.
T hisvariancewillhaveno impactont he oth ere xistingorpot ential usesand
struct ure s inthearea .
Bygranti ngt hisvariance t hi shomeca n bebrought intogrea ter comp liance with
thene ig hborhood pa rtic ularlyinregards t oits streetfrontage.
Th erewi llbe noeffect o n t helight ,a ir,distributionofpop ulation,t ransportation ,
traffic f acilities,utilities orpublic safety.
T his requestcompliesw ith theintent oft heTownof Vailplanning policiesand
development objectives by upgradinga rundownhom e andbring ing a
nonconforming projectinto m uch greate r (a lthoughnotco mplete)comp liance .
RK D Arc futects ,IncDesign and Con structi on
I H Main \trN"r SUI{('G004 P,O.80 ..SO'iS l d w dl lh .C o l ol ~do R16~2 (970)9261(;22 (970)9 lb·9812 la .
www.rkdarch.com
,.
z
~I
o
ST EP HANOFF RESI DENCE
2 339 CHAMON IX LANE
VAIL,C OLO RADO
LO~1•.""-<>CO<.._..___••"..........~~............
I
I
->=--,--
i
-"
i
I
-r-r-'e~rr________________o,l__
<'•
-+--
,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I<
I
n
II
\1u
,'L-,,:
:H=--=,,,=
•0 '...~~'!"'~<1~~..If.\
~\MJ~\.,,,,,
"---..---------,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,f ---------..,
\,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
\\)0==,,,
L ,
,,-,
-'z
I"\j
••,
I
!
•'I
!
I
'\
~
I
I"
1
l
ffiz
I'i'
I
S T EP H A NO FFR ES IDEN CE
2339C HAM O N IX LANE
V A IL,CO LORADO
LOT .t ."'OC K".........n ""R""'"0""..",hA"~..C"...,RICO .......".,
/3 '
(-1
z
,••
S TE PH A NOFF RES IDE N CE
2339 C HAMON IX L ANE
VAI L,COLORADO
~OT ',••COOOK A.H ~"'--""'.'O "00'"''''0\-,......""'.00_.....'.....NO 1
S TE PHA NO FF R E SID E N CE
2 339 CH AMON I X LAN E
VA IL,C OLO R A D O................""..._.._..S'O"'l0"v ......-.....__~...-HO ,
I
);
r
/
\
\
(
I
I
I
/,,
\
I '
I
"
L,
/'.'Iil;'
J
,,..
J
~I...
'--
I '.""'I'I'
S TEPHA NOFF RES I DE NCE
2339 C H A MO N IX L AN E
VA IL,COLO RA DO
..Ot ",'"<>Co<A,..£S UOOO'VOS >CI .."'"VA",....,.SC_••,..'''''''0 ,
\~-
\
,
,,
,,
e -.••
"Ii ,
;
11m !
;.1 i
l
'"
,
:1.Ii 1 !.,,,,
I
"(•,
,,~I 1:1 ,
i !(~
.,~:1 i •,-
!l:
,I I '.
I ,"•-.
lltl iii "••,•--Q.--~-
!l It fi I .e,
liH
..•
",.",•!.
TOf'OClfIAf'Ioll MM"
'91 ".•""'''_..._-.or _or _"""_"'·
....."'....1.............,(0.,....;;.."""
_..._,..,,,
~~f~3~j£~~~~~
!!".--..-
",,
"I -.r~i I ~
",
,,
."'!'\'~H~n .
:I
"
I I \
~
,
j
r
'I
•
I,i
I'
,
,IiIr
.~.•".1
1 ,11In~
I I I ,
i I II ,!ll!!(I!!II I1111 iIll(!~..q ;~t;!
,!'I I lilli"!III
!
-;a,i-.
/6T t ~btu ,/:-;:;
V~Dj(.6 '::;'h tJ>l..'--I
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Deve lopment
75SouthFrontageRoad,Vail,Colorado81657
tel :970.479.2139 fax:970.479.2452
web :www.o.veu.co.us
Project Name:STEP HANOFFRESIDENCE
Project Description:
sm COVERAGE VARIANCE
Participants:
PEe Number:PEC040074
OWNER SfEP HANOFF,ROBERT A.MICHA10/25/2004Phone :39 0-4529
POBOX 4573
VAll
CO8 1658
Ucense :
APPUCANT RKD ARCHITECTS10/25/2004Phone :970 -926-2622
POBOX5055
EDWARDS
CO81 632
license :
Project Address:2339 CHAMONIX LN VAIL Location:
Legal Description:Lot:11 Block:A Subdivision:VAlLDAS SCHONE FIL 1
Parcel Number:210311401010
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By :Kjesbo
Second By:Lamb
Vote :7·0
Conditions:
Action:APPROVED
Date of Approval:11/22/2004
Cond :8
(PLA N):Nochanges toth ese plans may be made without t he written consentof Townof
Vailstaff and/or t he appro priatereviewcomm ittee(s).
Cond:300
PEe app roval sha ll not be notbecome v alid for20daysfo llowing the date of
a pproval.
Cond:CON0006820
Thi sva riancereques t a pproval shallbecon ti ngent upon th eapplican t receiv ing Town
of Va il a pprova l of t herelateddesignrevi ew applica tion.
Planner:Bill Gi bson PEe Fee Paid :$500.00
•
T O:Pla nning andEnvironmental Com mission
FROM :Community Development Department
DATE :November 22,2004
S UBJE CT:A request fo r a fi nal reviewo f a va riance,f rom Sec tion 12-6 D-9,S ite
Cove ra ge,Vail T own Code.p urs uan tto Chapter 12-7,Varia nces .Va i l
T own Code,toa llow for a r es identia la ddition loca te d at 233 9Cham o nix
La ne/Lot 11,Blo ck A.Vai l Da s Schone F ilin g 1 ,an d s ett in g f orthde tai lsin
regardt h ereto .
Ap plicant:
Pl a n ner :
I.SUMMARY
R obertStep ha nafl',represent edby R KD Architects
B ill G ibson
Th e a pplican t,R obertStep hanoff,re prese nted by R KDAr c hitects,is reque stin g
a va r iance f romSectio n 12-6 D-9,Site Cove rage ,Va il T o w n Co de,to a llow f o r a
residential add ition ,locatedat 2339Chamo nix Lane .Based upon Staffs rev ie w
of thecriteriain Section V III ofthis memora nd um an d theevidence an d
testimony presented,theCommunity Development Department recommen ds
de nial of this v ariance requestsubj ect to t he findings noted in Section IXo fthis
memorandum.
II.DES CRIPTIONO FREQUEST
T he a pplica ntis proposing areno vation to an e xis tingsingle-family residence
w ith a one-carga rage,originally constructe d in 1979,locatedat 2339 Cha monix
Lane .A vicinity ma pha sbeen attachedfor reference (Attachmen tA).The
ex istinglotis non -conforming in rega rdtoth e Town'sminimum lot sizestand ards
an d thestructu re isnon-conformin qinregard tot heTow n'sengi neering
standa rds ford riveways .T his e xis ting househas 760sq .ft.of gross reside ntial
floo r area (4,159 sq .ft.allowed),4 90 sq .ft .of gar age(600 sq .It.allowed)w hich
create 1,290sq .ft.o f site cov erage(1 ,808 sq.ft..allowe d),and includesatwo-car
garage.
T heproposedre novation includes a new driveway ,two-car g arageaddition ,
enclosedentryway addition ,d ining/livingroom ad dition,a nda n upper level
expansion (maste rbedroom,bedroom2 ,bath 2,and office).Thisproposal will
invo lve lowerin g (hefront on e-thirdof the exis ting building byconverting the
existinggarage intocrawlspace a ndan enclosed e ntry .A newtwo-car garage
will then beattachedto the front of theex isting st ructure.Additions tot heupper
level of the struct ure arealso proposed .T hepropose d renovation w ill crea te a
total of3,0 1gsq.ft .ofGFRA (4 ,159 sq .ft .allow ed ),540sq .ft.of garag e area(600
sq.ft.allowed),and 2,071 sq .ft.ofsite coverage (1 ,808 sq.ft,allowe d).T he
applicant's request andproposed a rchitectural plans have been attac hedfor
reference (Attac hmentsB and C).
Theprovrstons ofSection 12-17,Varian ce.Vail TownCode.de termine t he
rev iewc riter ia a ndreviewp rocedures fo r ava riance request
III .BACKGROUND
The e xistingreside nce located at2339Chamo nix Lanewasoriginally
constructed i n1979 under EagleCountyj urisd iction andtodayislega lly non-
conforming inr egardtothe Town'smin im um lotsize standards an d t hestructure
isnon -confo rm ingi n regard to t he Town'seng inee ring standardsfo r d riveways.
The appl icants'proposal was conceptually reviewedbythe Design Review Bo ard
at itsNove mbe r 3,2004.pub lic h earing .Interms of a rchitecture and aesthetics ,
the Design ReviewBoa rd wasgenera lly support ive of applicant's proposa l.
Should the PlanningandEnvironmental Commissionch oose toapprove this
varia nce request.theassociat eddesign reviewapplicat ion wil l be te ntat ively
scheduledfo r final rev iew by the DesignReview Board atitsDecember 1,2004 ,
.publ ic hearing .
Staff hasresear ched other sitecove rage varia ncereq ue stsinordertoprov ide
the Planning a nd Envi ronmentalCom mission with additional backgrou nd
inform ation.Asummaryoftha tresearch isprovid ed below:
Forst!R esidence,(Octobe r 2004)
At theFo rstl Reside nce ,the applicantreque stedandwasgrantedasite
cove ragevarian ce of5.97%(341 sq.ft .)on a lotof only5,706 sq .ft.Theexisti ng
home hadnogarageand thepropo sedsite cove rage va riance facilitated the
construction o f a newone-s tory,two-c ar ga rage.
Houtsma Re sid en c:~,(July 2003 )
At the Hou tsmaRes idence,the a pplicant requested end was gran ted a site
cove rage vari anceof 1.5%(162 sq.ft.).The site had excess ive slopes a nd was
limited to 15%sitecover age per theTow n's Haza rdRegulations.T hisvaria nce
fa cilitated theco nstructionofa new on e-story.two-cargarage.
Ricci Reside nce,2576 Davos T rail (F e !l [u a ry ~~9 95 t AttheRicci Residence ,the
appl ica nt requ ested asitecove rage variance for 4 .7%(526.5 sq .ft .ofadditio nal
sitecov erage).The appli cantproposedtousethe additional sitecoverage to
create anenlarg ed two-car garage ,aswe ll a sadda small a mount ofadd itio nal
GRFAto theexisting reside nce.
Dea n/Rausch Res iQ ~Qf.e ._~9.42 _B_e!!.now e r (Ju ly 1993t At the DeanlRousch
reside nce,th e applicants request ed a 3.56%sitecoverage variance (287 sq .It.),
a setbackvaria nce (4 feet intoa20-foo t se tback),andawall heightvariance.
T he request for site coverageandwallheightvarianceswereapproved bythe
PEC,butthesetbackvariance for GRFAwa s denied .Itshou ld be noted tha l the
staffrecommended de nia l of thevariances,but thePECappr oved it.The i nterior
dimen sionsofthe garagewere 22.5 by22 .5 feet,andthe areaof thegarage
calc ulated forsite coveragewas 576 squarefeet.
2
•
•
,
Tay lor Residence .2409Chamoni x Road (May 1993 ):Atthe Taylorresidence,
the a pplica n t reques ted a nd wasgr anted asite coverage variancefo r1.3%(122
squarefee t)in o rder toco nstruct agarage and buildi ng co nnection onthe
p roperty.It sho uldbenoted that theall owedsite c overageonth islotis20 %(no t
15%).and theapp l icant wasalsogranted a variancetoconstru ct thegarage in
t he f ront set back (thes tope onth is lo t did notex ceed30%).The a pproved
i nterior dimensionsofthe two-car garagewere 21 feet by 20 feet ,foratotal
i nte rior areaof 420 sq.ft..T he garage co ntributed 462sq.ft .toward site
coverage .
MummaRes idence,1886West GoreCreek Drive (February 1993):Atthe
Mummaresidence ,theapplicantrequestedand w asg ranted a 1%sitecoverag e
varian ce in order toconstru cta garagead ditionon a lot tha i ex ceeds30%slop e.
The1%overage o n site cove rage amou ntedto approximate ly99 squa re fee t.
The interiordimensi ons oftheapprovedgaragemeasure 20fe et by20 feet,for a
totalinterior area of400 squarefeet.The garage co nt ributed 442 squarefe et
towa rd site coverage.
Or der of Rev iew :Gene rally ,a pplicationsw ill be reviewedfi rst bythe
Planning andEnvironm ental Com mission for acce ptabili ty ofuse andth en by the
Des ign Review Boa rd fo r c ompliance of proposed buildi ngsandsite planning.
Planning and Environmental Commiss ion:
Action:Th ePlan ning a ndEnvironmentalCommis sion is responsible for final
a p pro val/denia l/a pproval w ith c onditio ns ofavaria nce.
Th ePlanning and EnvironmentalCo mmiss ion is responsiblefor
evaluating aproposal fo r.
1.Relationsh ip and impac t of the useo n develo pmentobjectives ofthe
T own.
2 .Effectoftheuse o nlightandair,di stri but ion of population,
transportat ion faci l ities,utilities,schools,parksand recreationfacilit ies ,
andothe r publicfacil ities and public facilitiesneeds.
3.Effect upo n traffic,w ithpartic ular referen ce to congestion,a utomotive
a ndpedestrian safety and co nvenience,traffic nowand co ntrol,access,
maneuverability,and removal ofsnowf rom the streetsandpar king areas .
4 .Effectuponthe character of Ihe area in wh ich the proposeduse isto
be located,includ ingthescal e a ndbulkofthepr oposeduse inrelation to
surrou nding uses.
5 .Such ot herfactors and crite ria as theCommissio n deemsappl icable to
theproposeduse.
6.The env ironmentalimpac treport concern ing theproposeduse,if an
environ mental impact report isrequired by Cha pter 12 of this T itle.
3
Co nformance wit hde velopmentsta ndards of zo nedi strict
Lotarea
Setbacks
Building Height
Density
GRFA
Sitecove rage
Landscape are a
Parkin gan d loading
M itigation ofdevelopmentim pacts
Desig nRev iewB oard:
A ction:Th e Design Review Board has NOre viewauthority on ava riance,b ut
m ust rev iew anyacco mpanying Desig nReviewBoa rd a pplication.
Tow nC ounc il:
Actio ns ofDesignRev iew Boa rd or Pla nning a nd Environmenta l Co mmissio n
may beappe aled tothe Tow n Co unci lor bythe TownCounci l.T ownCo uncil
eval uates whether or n otthe P lanning a nd Environme ntalCommissiono rDesign
Review Boarderredwi th app rov als or denialsand canu phold,up hold wi th
m odifications,orover turn t he board's decisio n.
St aff:
T he sta ffis responsible for ensuring t hat allsubm ittal requirementsarep rovided
a nd p lan sconfo rm to thetech nica l r equirementsof t he ZoningReg ulation s.The
staff alsoadvises t he a pplicant astocom pliance wi th thedes ign guidelines.
Sta ffp rovides a staffmemorandumcontai ning bac kground onthe p roperty and
pro v ides a s ta ff evaluat ionoft he pro jectwit h respec t to ther equired c riteria and
find ings,a ndarecommendation o n ap prova l,approvalwi th co ndi tions ,ordenial.
Staff also f acilitates the review process.
V .AEEb!J<8_BL E PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff bel ieves t hat t he following prov isio ns of theVa ilTownCo de a re relevantto
the review ofthisproposal :
T ITLE12:Z ONING REGULATIONS
C hapter 12·60:Two-FamilyPrimary/Secon dary Residential (PIS)District
12-60-1 :Purpose :The two-family primary/secondary residentia l district is
intended to provide sitesfo r single-famify reside ntial usesor two-family
res idential usesinwhich one unit is a larger primary residence a nd theseco nd
unit is a smaller caretaker apartment,together withsuch public facilities as may
appropriatefy be located inthesame district.The two-family primary/secondary
residential district is intended toe nsure adequate lig ht,air,p rivacya nd open
spaceforeac h dwelling,commensurate withsingfe ·family and two-family
occupancy,andto maintain the desirable residentia l qualities of suchsites by
establishing appropriate site development standa rds.
Chapter 12-17 :Varia nces
12-17-1:Purpose :
4
A.Reasons For SeekingVariance:In ordertoprevent orto l essensuchp ractical
difficulties andunnece ssary physicalhardshipsinconsistent withtheobje ctivesof
this title as wouldres ult from strict or literalinterpre tation and enforcemen t,
variances from certain regulatio ns may be granted.A pra ctical diffic ulty or
unnecessary physical hardshipmayresultfrom thesize,shape,or dimensionsof
a siteorthe l ocationof existing structuresthereon;from topographi c or physical
conditionson the s ite or intheimmediate vicinity;or from other physical
limi tations,street locati onsor c onditionsinthei mmediatevi cinity.Cost or
inco nvenienceto theapplicant of strict or literal compliancewith a reg ulation
sh all notbe a rea sonfo rgranting a variance.
VI ,S IT E A NALYSI S
A dd ress:23 39ChamonixLa ne
Lega l Descripti on:Lot 11,Block A ,Va il dasSc hone 1 ~1 Filing
Zoning:Two -F amily Pr imary/Secondary Residentia l
Land UsePla n Designation :Medium Dens ity Re sidentia l
Current LandUse :Residentia l
LotA rea:9,042 sq.ft .(0.21a cres)
Hazards:Medi um Severity Rockfall
Development Standard Al lowed/Reg uired Pro.Q osed
Setbacks:
Fr ont:2 0'2 5'
W es t Side :15 '15 '
East Side:15'19'
Re ar:15'18'
De nsity :1 unit s +1 Type IEHU 1 u n it
GRFA :4,159 sq .ft.3 ,277s q.ft .
SiteCoverage:1,808sq .ft .(20%)2 ,071 s q .It.(23%)
Landscape A rea:5,42 5sq.ft.(60%)6,328sq.ft.(7 0%)
Parking:3sp aces 3s paces(2e nclosed)
VII.SURROUNDING LANDUSE S ANDZON ING
Nort h:
Sout h:
East:
Wes t:
C urrentLand Use
Re sidential
Res identia l
Res identia l
Residentia l
Zo ning
Tw o -Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Two-Fa milyPri mary/Seco n dary Reside ntial
Tw o-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
VIII.CR ITEBIA A ND FINDlNGl?
The rev iewc riteria fo ra r eque stofth is naturea re esta blishedbyC hapter 12 -1 6,
Va il Town Code.
5
A .Considerationof F a c!ors_~~ga rd in g the Set ba.ck V ariances:
1.Th e relationship of the requ ested v ariance to other exi sting or
potential u ses and structure s in the vicinity .
As pro posed ,the ce ntersectionof this structure (p roposed kitchen
area)does "step-down"in compariso n to the existing structure.
A lthough thecurren t proposal does utilize a ll of the sites availab le
GRFA o rbuilding heig ht;th is does notpreventa future renovation
from maximizin gthe se twodevelopmentstandards .'rh eretore..
Staff believes the granting of a site cover age variancewo uld a llow
for theco nstruction of buildingbulk a nd mass that ex ceeds wh at
w ouldotherwise beallowed bythe zon ing regu lations.
2.Thed egree to which r elief f rom the strict and literal
interpretation and enforcement of a s pecifiedregulation i s
neces sary to achieve c ompatibility and uniformity of
treatm ent among sites inthe vicinity or t o attain th e
o bjectivesof this ti tle w i thout a grant o f s pec ial privilege.
Thisvariance request isa ssociatedw itha remodelofanexisting
res idence o riginally co nstructed i n1979.T heexis ting residence is
anon-confonningst ructure i n regardto the provisionso fthe
Town'sdrivewaysta ndards.Theapp licant is proposing a
renovation thatwill bring thi sstr uct urei nto co mpl iancew iththe
Tow n'sdriveway standards;however,t hisproposal exceeds the
maximum allowable site coveragefor t hesite.A lthough the
applicantis pro posing to remedy an ex istingnon-conforming
situat ion,a newdeviationfrom the T own Code wi ll be created .
Alt ho ughthe Planning a nd Environmental Commiss ion has
previously held thatconstructiono f as tructureprior tothe
adoption ofthe current zo ning regu lat ions may beabasisfor
g ranting a var iancefromthe Town 'scurrent zo ning regulations,
Staffbelieves that designa ltern ativesareavai lab le to the
ap plicant toco nstruct add itions toth is structure wit houtexceeding
thesite coveragestandards.Staffbelieves theonlyelement of
this renovationthat is necessarytoaddr ess theexistingdriveway
non-conformityis thega rage addition.Today there is 5 18 sq.ft.of
unusedsite covera ge avai lab leforarenovationof thisproperty.
Staff believes5 18 sq.ft.isanadequa te amo unt ofsite cove rageto
const ruct anewtwo-carga rage i n compliancew iththe Town's
dr ivewaysta ndards (the TownCode requiresenclosed parking
spacestobe 9'x18 ',which is162sq .ft.,t hus theminimum sizeof
atwo-car gara ge must be324 sq.fl.).Staff doesnot be lieve the
additionalsite coverage sq uare footage crea tedbythe proposed
garagestairs,entry sta irs ,dining room,masterbedroom
expa nsio n,bedroom2ex pansio n,ba th 2expa nsion,and the
officeexpansion is necessaryto remedythe existin g dr iveway
non-conformity.
6
Staff beli eves theap plica nt's proposa l s hould bemod ified to
comply wit h t he site coverage requirementsby r educi ng (o r
eli minating)anyof t he fo llow ingp roposedaddi tions :ga rage ,
garage stai rway,en closed entryway st airs,mast er bedroom,
bedroom2 ,bath 2,office ,or d ining room.
T herefore ,Slaffdoes n ot belie ve the p roposedvaria ncerequest
isthe min imum degreeof relief necessary f romt he st ricta nd
lite ral i nterpretationand enfo rcement of thes ite coverage
r egulations necessa ry to achieve com patibility and u niformity
amo ng sitesinth e vic inityand wit hint he Two-Fami ly
Primary/Secondary Residential (PIS)District.
If theproposal ism odified 10 co mply w ith the Town 'ssitecove raqe
s tandards .nova riances arenecessaryfo r thisp roposed
renovatio n.
3.Theeffect ofth e requested va riance o nli ghta nd air,
distr ibut ion of popu lation,t ran sportation a nd t r affic f ac iliti es ,
pub licf acilities and ut ilities,and p ubl icsa fe ty,
Staff doesnotbelieve thep roposed sitecove rage v ariance will
haveas ignificant neg ativeimp act on t his criterion in compa r iso n
toexisting cond it ions.
4.Su c h other f ac tors and criteria ast he commission deems
applicab l e to th e proposed va ria nce.
B.T he Planning and_Env ironmental Commission sha llmake thefo llowing
fi ndingsJ';lefo re gra n ting .1iI--Y:~.lfia nce :
1.T hat the grantingof the variance w ill n otco nstitute a gran to f
special pr ivilegein consistent wi t h thelimitations on other
p roperties cl assifiedin the same dist rict.
2.T hatthegrantingof t he v ariance will not be detr im ental to t he
pub licheal th,s afetyor we lfa re ,ormaterially injurious t op roperties
o r imp rovementsin t hevic in ity .
3.Thatthevaria nce iswarr a nted for o neor more of thefollowing
reasons:
8 .T hestr ictl iteral i nterpretationore nforcement of the
speci fiedregulation w ould result i np ractical difficulty or
u nnecessaryphys icalhardship inconsistentwi ththe
objec tives ofthis title .
b.T here are except ions o r extraordinaryci rcumstancesor
c o ndit ions app lic able to thesamesiteofthevarianc e tha t
donot apply ge ner allyto other properties in thesame
zo ne.
c.Thest r ict interpretation ore nfo rcement of the spe cified
reg u latio n wo uld de prive t he applica nt of priv ileges
enjo yed bythe ow ners ofothe rp ropertiesin th esame
dis t rict.
7
IX.STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Th eCo mmunity Development Department re com me nds d enial of t h ev ariance
request fromSection 12-60 -9,Site Coverage,Vail TownCode,pursuant to
Chap ter 12-7,Variances,Va il Tow n Code,toallow fora residential addition
loca teda t 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 1 1,Block A,Va il DasSc honeF ili ng 1.Staffs
re co mm e ndationis ba sed upon t he review ofthe c riteria in Section V III o f t his
m emorandumandtheev idence a nd tes timo ny presented.Should t he P lanning
a ndEn vironmentalCo mmissio n choose to d enyt his req uest;t he Comm unity
Development Departmentreco mmends theCommission makethefollowing
f indings:
1.T hatt he g rantingo fthevaria nce w i ll consti tute ag ranting o f s pecial
privilege inco nsistent with thelimitations on otherproperties cl assified in
thesamedi strict.
2.T hat the grantingoft he va riancewill notbedet rimenta l to thepublic
health,safety,orwe lfare.or materially injuri oustoproperties or
improvementsin th evicini ty .
3.Thest rict literalinterpretationore nforcement of thespeci fiedregulation
wo uldnotresu lt in prac ticald ifficultyor unnecessa ry physicalhardship
inconsistent withtheobjectives of thistitle.
4 .Thestrictinterpretationo r en forcement ofthespecifiedregulatio n woul d
not depriveth e applicant ofpriv ilegesenjoyedby theow ners ofot her
properties in thesame distr ict.
Shouldthe Plan ning andEnvironmentalCommissio n choose to a pprovethis
request;theCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentrecommendsthe Commission
makethefotlowinq fin dings:
1.Thatthe gra nting of the va riance will notconstitutea granting of special
privilege i nco nsistentwith the limitations on ot her propertiesclassified in
the samedistrict.
2 .Thatthegranting of theva riance w illnot bedetrimental to th epublic
health,safety ,orwel fare,or materiallyinjurio us topropertiesor
improvements inthevicinity.
3.Thestrict literal in terpretation or enforcemento fthespecified regulation
wo uldresultinpractical difficulty orunnecessary physica l hardship
inconsis tent withthe objectives of this title.
4 .Thestrict inte rpretation o r enfo rcement ofthespecifiedregu lation would
dep rive theapplicant ofprivileges enjoyedbythe ownersofother
properties inthesamedist rict.
8
,
S ho uld the P lanningandEnvironmentalCo mmission choose toapprove this
co nditio nal usepe rmit request,the Community Development Department
recommendsthe followingco nditio ns:
1.Thisva riance request a pproval shall be co ntingent upo n the appl icant
receivingTownofVail approva l ofthe related design reviewapplication.
x.A,,~CHMENTS
A.Vicin ityMap
B.Applicant'sStatement
C.Architectural Plans
D.Architectural Planhig hlightedtoshow proposed site coverage
E.Public Hearing Notice
9
~
Q).o
E
CD>o
Z
111
Uc
CIl ";".'"CI et:-._nI
en""!.~E
...0 E
:::E 0O~()
C U
llll!:,eMa,N
111..
II)
Attachment:A
ba
"
o
I
Attachment:B
Description o fthe Variance r equested for the Stephanoff Residence
Therequest is foravariancefromthe20%site coverag e maximuminthe2
FamilyPrimary/Secondaryzonedist rict.This isa non-conforminglot.Thesquare
foolageis9,041,73 ,TheminimumSquare footagein t hezonedistrictis15,000
squarefeet.Thecurrentgraveldriveisinexcessof 16 %.Themostpracticalway
toresolvethedriveway issue istobuildagarageinfrontoftheexisting slructu re
atanelevationsetforanappropriate drivewayslope.Theresultantgarageslab
wouldbe10feetbelowtheexisting lower level.Wehaveproposedthisgarage
andaheatedentry t hatwill conn ect thehometolhenewgarage.Thenew
constructionwillresolve thedriveway issueandwillcomplywithallotherzon ing
restrictions but ,duetot he smalllotsize,will exceedthe1,808maximumsquare
foo tageby 262square f eet.Theexisting nonconformingdrive/garageandthe
no n-conforming sitecreate asignificantpracticai difficulty.Thestrict
interp retation ofthesitecoveragereguiation wouldpermit only 5 18 a ddiliona l
square feet ,whichisnot sufficient toprovidearequiredtwo-cargarageandan
entry .Th eproposedsitecove rage of2,071 issignificantlyunderthe3,000
squar e feetofsitecoverage ofaconformingminimallot inth is zonedistrict.
T hisvariance will haveno impactontheothere xisting orpotential usesand
structuresinthearea .
By granting thisvariance this homecanbe brought into greater compliance with
t heneighbor hood particularlyin regardstoitsstreet frontage.
T herewillbe noeffec t on t he light,air,d istributionof population,transportation,
t raffic facilities,utilities orpublic safety.
Thisrequestcomp lies withtheintentofthe TownofVailplanningpol icies and
development objectives byupgradingarundownhomeandb ringing a
nonconformingproject intomuchgreater(aithough notcomplete)comp liance.
RKD Architects,Inc.Design and Constr uction
1 ~]M cli n sueer SUI[t"G004 .P.O.8 0 ..S055 .fd wolld,.Co lorado 8 163 1.1(0170)Q16-16 2l .(970]926 9822 fa ..
www.rkdarch.com
~,
,
Attachment:C
..'
~~
I
::F!j
"Ill ~Ir'I"H,dr'Iii'I IIII,f,
,"I ',":i.j1III
~~.
-,
.'.
,
e
"•
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
"s
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~,
o
,'Hi!
"I',.r
i S TEP HANO FFR ES ID EN CE
2339 CHAMON IX LAN E
VAIL ,COLORADO
LO~"."Lo<':><~,..F"".."""",.....".V"''-"""$C"""'_'"'''0 ''''',
..--,,,
!
!
j
I
I !
I.
,,-
'0 c .,)
,
\I ~--]
,,,,,,,
""""""""""",,
,-----
,---,~-..---.---------------L 7)""",----L-,,0:
••!::,
I
~l5 D
---------------:o..t:-,,,,,,,,,,
\,,,,,,
\..-~-~-~_~,:lI~"j;::i'-'J,,,,'9
._--------
,'[::'fl':l,c,.,~
>
"•
EB,
I
I
-..:ll
I
I I !~r~-f'ill i I
./-
IX ""
rz )vi,.'.2--,-
"•2
STE P HI\NOFF RES IDENCE
2 339 C HA MONIX L A NE
V I\IL.C OLORADO
~....,".....oe><A ......-on.o....-0""_......__.........-.0 •
,-"~:J,.,0
~,
•z
:I,.
,I
1\
-p tl~~-,--"
-;;D!:P-
-"ZS _Ls....---,
--'-'-_.-~=-OR ~._-,
""",""",,-~
---,--,~•
•-~
~
---~-:.._.AlMW'__I _
~g"lm-_~-_.=-_-(-----.
,
",,
...!.h ·-~
S TEP H ANOFFR E SID ENC E
2339 C I I AMO N IX L AN E
V A IL .C O L O R A D O
.01",•.••00:',.,"'"""An...c ....
...,
I I ;•I,,;
:;C:::;-u:..=,
,.
1I !i
'"..'I•I
,-
i
STEPHANOFF RE SIDEN CE
2339 C HAMO N IXL AN E
VAIL ,COLO RADO
•"........0<:............--~....VA .__&<0__'''_0.0 1
i,
\
i
(
I
\
\
I
I
\
I
"
I
.,\'
!
/
,,
\,,
!
hi!IillI,I
11
"II
S TEP HANOFF RES IDENCE
;.>339 C HA MO NIX LANE
VAIL ,C OLOR ADO
C,"".~..oe".,"C,>,,,."'¥'SOON"'-...",..C"'.SC''')H~"...,."."0 .'
•
",,,
,
.'
..-'-,
r,
••
:-------------
1fI't/1';~"';7'i:'~";"Ci",,.,...,,",-.-·-,-r-.-1•
••••••••·'••••••••,':',~---~:.·',',',\,
lj
I '11,
I',
Attachm ent:0
•r
3
,,
•~
~•-•~\
8~
T HIS IT EM MA YAF FECTYOURPRO PERTY
PUBLI C NOT ICE
*
Atta chment :E
roWN~
NOT ICE IS HEREBY GIVEN t hatt hePlanni ng andEnvironme ntal Co mmi ssio n of the T ow n o f
V ailo n No ....e m be r 22,2 004 ,at 2 :00 PM in t he Town of V a il M u nicipa l Building,in cons ide ration
of :
A r eq uestfo r f inal r eview o f a major e xterior alter ation ,pu rsu ant t oSectio n 1 2 ~7 A -2 ,Ext er io r
A lte ratio ns o rM odificat ions,Vai l Tow nCo de ,and a va ria nce fromSect io n 1 2 ~7 A ~7 ,Height,Vail
Town Code ,t o a llow for revisions t ot hep rev io usly approved develo pment p lan f orO ne Wi llow
Bridge Road(p rev iously Swiss Chale t),locate d at 100 Wi llowB ridgeRo adfT r acts K&L,Block
5E ,Va il V illag e Fi rst F iling ,a ndse tting fo rth d etails in rega rd t hereto .
Applicant:OneWi llow Brid ge Road,represented byReso rtDesign ,Inc.
Planner :George Ru t her
A request fo r areco mmendat io nt o t heVa il Tow n Co u ncilof pro pose d t ex t a mendmentst o
Sect ion 12-3-3(E),Ap pea l of Tow nCo u ncil Decisions ;a nd s etting fo rthde tailsin rega rd t h er eto .
App licant:TownofVai l,r ep r ese ntedb y M a tt M ire
Plan ner:G eorge Rut her
A req u estfo r afina lrev iewo f av ariance ,fr omSec tion 12-6 G~8 ,DensityCon t rol,V a il Tow n
C ode ,pu r s uant t oC hapte r 12 -7 ,Va riances,Vail TownCode,toa llowfor a ddit ional g ross
residential floo r a rea a nd dwellin g u nit ,locatedat46 90 Vail Racq u et C lub Driv eNa il Ra cque t
Clu b Co ndos ,and sett in gf orth d e t ail in regard t hereto.
A pp licant :RacquetC lubOw ners Associa tion,r epresentedbyTRD Architects
Planner :MattGen nett
Arequestfor fin a l r eviewofa Co ndition al Use Pe rmit ,pu rsuant t oSec tio n 12-6 0-3 ,C ondi tiona l
Uses,Va il Tow n Co de,toa llow for a Ty pe II Employee Hou s ing Unit,loca te dat4812Me adow
Lane/Lo t 8 ,Block7 ,Big h o r n F ifth A ddition,and sett ing forth d etails in re gar d the reto.
A pplica nt:Big ho rn LL Candt he Dua ne F.RogersRevo cab leTrust ,rep resentedby Larry
Be nw ay
Pla nn er :Bill Gi bson
Areq ue stforr evisiont ot h e fin al pl at,pu rsuant to Ch apte r 1 3 ~4 ,M inorSu bd ivision,Va il Tow n
Code ,t o all owfor add itio na l g ross residentia l fl oorarea,locat ed at 1094 Riva Gl en/Lo t4 ,
Spraddle C ree k Estates ,an d setting f o rt hdeta ils in r eg a rdt hereto .
Applica nt:W&8 Develo pment,LL C ,re pres e nte dby Tim L osa ,Ze hren a nd Associa tes ,In c.
Plan ner:M attGe nnett
Areques tf ora fin alrev iew of ava riance,f romSect ion 12-6 0 -9,Site Coverage,Vai l Town
Cod e ,purs ua ntt o Chapter 12-7 ,V a ria nces,V ailTow n C ode,t oa llow fo ra re s ide nt ialaddition
loca ted a t2339C hamonix La ne/Lot 11,Block A ,Vai l Da s Sc hone Filing 1,and setti ng fo rt h
details in rega rd the ret o .
Applicant:Robert Stepha noff,r epresented byJackS now ,RK D Archi tects
Planner:Bill G ibso n
Thea pplicatio n sand in fo rmationa bo ut t he proposals a re availab le for p ublic inspec t io nd uri ng regula r
offic eho ursat t h e Tow n o f Vai l Co mmunity Develo pment De p artment,7 5Sout h Front ageRo ad.The
pu blic is invited to attend project or ient ationa ndthes ite v isits that precede t he pu blic h earing int he
Townof Vai l Co mmunityDevelo p ment Depa rt ment.Please c a ll (970)4 79 ~2 1 38 foradd itio nal
informatio n.
Sign languageint erp retation isa vailable upo n req ue st w ith 24~hour n otificatio n.Ple aseca ll
(97 0)47 9 -2356 ,Teleph o ne f orthe Hearing Im paire d ,fo r info rmat ion.
Published ,November5 ,2004 ,in theVa il Daily.
PropertyOw ners ad jacent tothe sub ject propcr"':2339 Cha mo nix Lane,Vuil
1.\"'edel Enterpris es
P.O.Box388
Edwards,CO81632
2.David G.H ilb
1592Matte rhorn C i rcle
Va il,CO 81657
3 .Abby S.Sc hwartz
668F lagst aff Dr.
Cinci nnati ,011 45215
4.BertV.S.&Glenda L.Wong
40 Bertba C i r.
C olorado S prings,C O 80906
5.Townof Vail
75S.Fro ntage Hd .
Va il,C O81 657
Physical Address:23 78 Garmi seh Drive,Vail
Lega l Descr iption :Townhouse Site 3
Su b:VailDasScho ne Filing2
BLK:G
LOT:10
Physicu l Address :2358Garmise h Drive,Vai l
Legal Description.Sub:Va il Das Sc hone Filing 2
ULK :G
LOT:11
Physical Address :23-49 C hamonixRd.,Va il
Lega l Descripti on:S ub:Va il D~ls Sch one Filing 1
BLK:A
LOT:12
Physical Address:232 C hamonixRd .,Vail
Leg al Descripti on:S ub:Vail Das Schon eFiling 1
BLK:A
LOT:10
Physical Address:2310Cha munix Rd.,Va il
Legal Description:Sub:Va il DasSc hone Filin1=:1
P arcel n R esult Trac tD
Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission
Department o f Community Development
75 South Frontage Road,Vail,Colorado 8 1657
tel :970 .479.2139 fax:970.4792452
web:www.vailgov .com
General I nform ation :
All projects requiringPlanningand Environmental Commission review m ust receive a pproval prior 10sUbm itting a
bu ilding permit application .Please refer tothe subminal requirements for the particular approval thai is requested .
An application forPlanni ng and Environmental Commission review cannot b e accepted until eu requ ir edinformation
is received bytheCommunity Development Department.The proect may alsoneedto be reviewed bytheTown
Counciland /or the Design Review Board .
Type of Application a ndFee :
•Rezoning $1300 •Conditional Use Permit $650
•fo.1ajor SubdivisiorJ $1500 •Fk:lodplain Modification $400
•MinorSubdivis ion $650 •M inor Exterior Alte rat ion $650
•Exemption Plat $650 •Major Exterior Alteration $800
•Minor Amendment toan SOO $1000 •Development Plan $1500
•New Specia l Developme nt District $6000 •Amendment 10 a Development Plan $250
•Majo r Amendment 10 an Soo $6000 •ZOn ing Code AmElf"lCinent $1300
Major Amendmenttoan 800 $1250 •Variance a1&KD
(no exterior modificatiOnS)•Sign Variance $200
Desc ription of th e Req u est:"""·It<:.CDv~r:::-WiANG@'
o z
Loca tion of the Proposal:Lot :lL Block :_~_$Ltx:l ivision:~P:2 ,VD..c;,~I
Physical Address:Z.~~q1~·,l(W
010\0
Parcel No .:~'O_~_:.J !':1'~o-(ContactEagle Co .Assessor at970-328-8640 fo r parce l no .)
Zoning:z.'&''''''~~~
NameCs)of Owner(s)::iOlek %;=~_
Mailing Address:=:~~.~Io~~~~~;~
Own er(s)Si gnature(s}:""'1-""-=-"'-''-''''''s,,...!::=....---::::::...--'------------
Nam e o f Applicant:1Z.K.O A.1i?J;..~l1Ef.T':::t -~e.c..k.~N",~
"l .zc.,-7.C;7.t:
~~~
Mailing Add ress:----'f-'-"'-'''''-~--.:;===--''"'''=='''''"''_::_c_,__---,---=-----~
________________Phon e:'l«.z.::."z c:.
E-mail Address:~i?12A e.~H ,'"et'4Faxi ---'12.""-...::l-'L"-''''--_
Prolect No .:
Ie l lel By:Cl.a \(\"'-~:\Y -V(j ,6 -.Jv<c
PECNo.:f E.d 1-oC>¥{
For Office lJs..8 On)Y:
Fee Paid:'S CO .Check No,:
Meel ;ngDale:1\1p..\~
Planne r:
Page t of 6-04101104
RECV OCT 2 5 2D D4
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
TOWN OF vx n ,COI.oRA.DO Stat ement
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Statement Number :
Payment Method :
CONSTRUCT ION,IN C.
R040006974
Check
Am o unt:$5 0 0.0 0 10 !2 5 !20 0403 :40 P M
I nit :LC
No t at i on :#1849 !COL
Perm it No:
Pa r ce l No:
Si te Add ress :
Loca tion :
PEC040 074 Type:PEe -Variance
2 10 3 11 40 10 10
233 9 CHAM ONIX LN VAIL
2 339 CHAMONIX LANE
This Payme nt :$500.00
Total Fee s:
T otal ALLP mts :
Balan ce:
$500 .00
$5 00 .0 0
$0 .0 0
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ACCOUNT ITE MLI ST :
Account Code
PV 00 1000031 1250 0
Descr ipti on
pre APP LICATI ON FEES
Cu rrent Pm ts
500 .00
Descript ion o f t he Va ri ance r equested f or th e Stepha nolf Res idence
Therequestis fora variance fromthe20%sitecoverage maximuminthe2
Fam ily Primary /Secondary zonedistrict.Th isisa non-conforming lot.Thesquar e
footageis 9,041.73 .The minimumSquarefootageinthezoned istrict is15 ,000
sq uaref eet.Th ecu rrent grave l driveis in exc essof16 %.Themostpract ical way
to resolve the d rivewayissueis to buildagaragein f rontof the existi ng structure
atane levation set fora n appropriate driveway slope .Th e resultantga rage sla b
wo uldbe 10 feetbe low the existi nglower level.W ehave proposed th is garage
a ndahea ted entrytha t will con ne ct thehometo th enewga rage.Th enew
co nstructionwillreso lve the driveway issuea nd will co mply witha ll otherzoning
restrictionsbut.duetot he small lotsize ,will exceedthe 1,808m aximum square
footage by262 s quarefee t.Th ee xisting nonco nform ing d rive/garage andthe
non-conforming sitecreateas ignificant practical d ifficulty.T he strict
interpretationofthesite cove rage regulationwou ld permit o nly518 a dditional
s quarefeet ,whi chis not suffi cientto provid e arequ iredtwo-ca r garageandan
e ntry.Th e proposedsite coverageof2,071 issignificantl y under the3,000
s quarefeet of s ite coverage of aconform ing min imal lotinthis zone district.
T hisvariancewillhaveno impactont he oth ere xistingorpot ential usesand
struct ure s inthearea .
Bygranti ngt hisvariance t hi shomeca n bebrought intogrea ter comp liance with
thene ig hborhood pa rtic ularlyinregards t oits streetfrontage.
Th erewi llbe noeffect o n t helight ,a ir,distributionofpop ulation,t ransportation ,
traffic f acilities,utilities orpublic safety.
T his requestcompliesw ith theintent oft heTownof Vailplanning policiesand
development objectives by upgradinga rundownhom e andbring ing a
nonconforming projectinto m uch greate r (a lthoughnotco mplete)comp liance .
RK D Arc futects ,IncDesign and Con structi on
I H Main \trN"r SUI{('G004 P,O.80 ..SO'iS l d w dl lh .C o l ol ~do R16~2 (970)9261(;22 (970)9 lb·9812 la .
www.rkdarch.com
,.
z
~I
o
ST EP HANOFF RESI DENCE
2 339 CHAMON IX LANE
VAIL,C OLO RADO
LO~1•.""-<>CO<.._..___••"..........~~............
I
I
->=--,--
i
-"
i
I
-r-r-'e~rr________________o,l__
<'•
-+--
,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I<
I
n
II
\1u
,'L-,,:
:H=--=,,,=
•0 '...~~'!"'~<1~~..If.\
~\MJ~\.,,,,,
"---..---------,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,f ---------..,
\,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
\\)0==,,,
L ,
,,-,
-'z
I"\j
••,
I
!
•'I
!
I
'\
~
I
I"
1
l
ffiz
I'i'
I
S T EP H A NO FFR ES IDEN CE
2339C HAM O N IX LANE
V A IL,CO LORADO
LOT .t ."'OC K".........n ""R""'"0""..",hA"~..C"...,RICO .......".,
/3 '
(-1
z
,••
S TE PH A NOFF RES IDE N CE
2339 C HAMON IX L ANE
VAI L,COLORADO
~OT ',••COOOK A.H ~"'--""'.'O "00'"''''0\-,......""'.00_.....'.....NO 1
S TE PHA NO FF R E SID E N CE
2 339 CH AMON I X LAN E
VA IL,C OLO R A D O................""..._.._..S'O"'l0"v ......-.....__~...-HO ,
I
);
r
/
\
\
(
I
I
I
/,,
\
I '
I
"
L,
/'.'Iil;'
J
,,..
J
~I...
'--
I '.""'I'I'
S TEPHA NOFF RES I DE NCE
2339 C H A MO N IX L AN E
VA IL,COLO RA DO
..Ot ",'"<>Co<A,..£S UOOO'VOS >CI .."'"VA",....,.SC_••,..'''''''0 ,
\~-
\
,
,,
,,
e -.••
"Ii ,
;
11m !
;.1 i
l
'"
,
:1.Ii 1 !.,,,,
I
"(•,
,,~I 1:1 ,
i !(~
.,~:1 i •,-
!l:
,I I '.
I ,"•-.
lltl iii "••,•--Q.--~-
!l It fi I .e,
liH
..•
",.",•!.
TOf'OClfIAf'Ioll MM"
'91 ".•""'''_..._-.or _or _"""_"'·
....."'....1.............,(0.,....;;.."""
_..._,..,,,
~~f~3~j£~~~~~
!!".--..-
",,
"I -.r~i I ~
",
,,
."'!'\'~H~n .
:I
"
I I \
~
,
j
r
'I
•
I,i
I'
,
,IiIr
.~.•".1
1 ,11In~
I I I ,
i I II ,!ll!!(I!!II I1111 iIll(!~..q ;~t;!
,!'I I lilli"!III
!
-;a,i-.
~o
".
3..
~
,.'..'
.,-..'--~~
--
....¥''~O ""'~0I60,.:~~,..~.....~.....~....~....~.~_....~....__'~r-----------------,,
,,,,,,,,,,
',-----------------.,~_-------------JL.,,
'.~i:."'-...!.I..!;!:'~lL',,,,.,_''f'I iiI!~~~._.:Ir::"~"':_:~-J,'
c