HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEISIssues
PEIS Issues
PEIS Issues
Excerpted from
VAIL TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Prepared for:
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Prepared by:
Washington Infrastructure Services, Inc.
402 7TH Street, Atrium Suite 111
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
WGI Project Number 2284.02
July 2002
Table of Contents 1 Town of Vail
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Vail Village Deliveries
Introduction...................................................................................................................................1-1
Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 1-4
Operations .................................................................................................................................1-10
Chapter 2: In-Town Shuttle Bus System
Introduction...................................................................................................................................2-1
Town Bus System Overview .........................................................................................................2-2
Objectives.....................................................................................................................................2-3
Options for the Vail In-Town Shuttle System.................................................................................2-3
Analysis of Remaining Technologies ............................................................................................2-4
Recommendations........................................................................................................................2-9
Chapter 3: Outlying Bus System
West Vail Bus Route Overview .....................................................................................................3-1
Downvalley Bus System ...............................................................................................................3-7
Chapter 4: Trail System Interface
Recreation Trails Constructed since 1990.....................................................................................4-1
Pedestrian I-70 Undercrossings Constructed Since 1990 .............................................................4-2
Recommendations........................................................................................................................4-3
Chapter 5: Level of Service Analysis
Introduction...................................................................................................................................5-1
Intersection Level of Service.........................................................................................................5-1
Possible Solutions.........................................................................................................................5-4
Parking Structure Level of Service................................................................................................5-5
Chapter 6: Connecting Fixed Guideways Draft Report
Introduction...................................................................................................................................6-1
I-70 Mountain Corridor Major Investment Study ............................................................................6-2
Recommendations........................................................................................................................6-4
Table of Contents 2 Town of Vail
Chapter 7: Noise
Noise Terminology........................................................................................................................7-2
CDOT's Noise Policy.....................................................................................................................7-4
Noise Analysis ..............................................................................................................................7-5
Modeling Results ..........................................................................................................................7-7
Sensitivity Analysis .....................................................................................................................7-11
Noise Abatement ........................................................................................................................7-15
Summary ....................................................................................................................................7-32
Chapter 8: I-70 Capping
Introduction...................................................................................................................................8-1
Opportunities ................................................................................................................................8-2
General I-70 Capping Issues ........................................................................................................8-4
Environmental Impact Considerations...........................................................................................8-6
General Capping Considerations ..................................................................................................8-7
Capping Construction Issues ........................................................................................................8-8
Comparative Capping Projects....................................................................................................8-11
Chapter 9: Traffic Model
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................9-1
Model Development......................................................................................................................9-1
Existing Network ...........................................................................................................................9-6
Future Network..............................................................................................................................9-7
Summary.....................................................................................................................................9-10
Chapter 10: PEIS Issues
Issues ........................................................................................................................................10-1
Other Issues ...............................................................................................................................10-6
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................10-9
Appendices
A1: Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, March 2000 and July 2000
A2: FHU Vail Village Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, September 2000
B1: Project Objectives and Criteria
B2: Technology Screening Process
C1: Portions of the Eagle County Trails Master Plan
C2: Trail Maps from Original Transportation Master Plan
D1: Intersection Level of Service
D2: Roundabout Level of Service
E: I-70 Capping and Fixed Guideway Mapping
F1: CDOT Noise Analysis and Abatement Guidelines
F2: Noise Contour Mapping
G: FHWA Joint Development Study
H1: Population and Employment Data
Table of Contents 3 Town of Vail
H2: Traffic Volume Data
H3: Model Calibration
H4: Growth Model
H5: Trip Reassignment Work Table
List of Figures
1-1: Potential Delivery Quadrants for the Commercial Core......................................................1-8
2-1: Comparative Screening Matrix...........................................................................................2-7
4-1: New Trails Completed Since 1990.....................................................................................4-4
7-1: Receiver Locations ............................................................................................................7-8
7-2: Approximate Noise Wall Locations ..................................................................................7-25
8-1: Total Costs for Each Tunnel ............................................................................................8-18
9-1: Schematic Representation of the Vail Transportation Model Network................................9-2
9-2: Schematic Representation of the Vail Transportation Model Network.................................9-4
List of Tables
3-1: Low-Floor Vehicle Specifications.......................................................................................3-5
5-1: Level of Service for a Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection ............................................5-2
5-2: Town of Vail Existing LOS Analysis ...................................................................................5-3
5-3: Town of Vail Existing Parking Structure LOS Analysis.......................................................5-5
7-1: Typical Noise Levels..........................................................................................................7-3
7-2: CDOT Noise Abatement Criteria........................................................................................7-4
7-3: I-70 Segment Characteristics.............................................................................................7-7
7-4: Noise Model Results..........................................................................................................7-9
7-5: Noise Level Ranges Based on Distance from I-70...........................................................7-11
7-6: Relative Noise Level Increases Based on Traffic Volumes ..............................................7-13
7-7: Decibel Increases Based on “Jake” Brake Noise .............................................................7-14
7-8: Decibel Increases Based on Rumble Strip Noise.............................................................7-14
7-9: Noise Wall Descriptions...................................................................................................7-23
7-10: Noise Model Results with Mitigation Measures in Place ..................................................7-26
7-11: Masonry (Concrete Block) Noise Wall Cost .....................................................................7-28
7-12: Concrete Pre-Cast Panel Noise Wall Cost.......................................................................7-28
7-13: Concrete Cast in Place Noise Wall Cost ..........................................................................7-28
7-14: Noise Model Results with Mitigation Measures in Place ..................................................7-29
7-15: Relative Noise Level Increases Based on Traffic Volumes ..............................................7-34
9-1: Nodes in the Vail Transportation Model.............................................................................9-2
9-2: Links in the Vail Transportation Model...............................................................................9-4
9-3: Origins and Destinations Matrix (Existing).........................................................................9-5
9-4: Estimated Growth for Nodes in the Vail Model...................................................................9-7
9-5: 2020 Adjusted Volumes for the Vail Model ........................................................................9-9
10-1: PEIS Issues for the Town of Vail and Possible Solutions................................................10-11
Executive Summary i Town of Vail
Executive Summary
Vail, Colorado attracts a large number of visitors each year because of its world-class ski
area, wide array of recreational opportunities, and thriving economy with numerous
restaurants, retail businesses, and services to choose from. With a high volume of visitors
comes a need for an efficient transportation system to get visitors to and from Vail and to
transport them within the Town as well. In 1990, the Town of Vail undertook a Transportation
Master Plan to address all transportation systems and future needs for the area (see Vail
Transportation Master Plan, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig, 1993). That document addressed the
current transportation system within Vail and also provided recommendations for
improvements to the system.
Purpose of the Update to the Transportation Master Plan
The Town of Vail makes great efforts to keep its transportation system as efficient and
updated as possible. This is evidenced by the many improvements and additions to the
system over the years to accommodate the high volumes of visitors and traffic each year.
Because ten years have passed since the production of the original Transportation Master
Plan, the Town has deemed it necessary to provide an update for the continued efficiency of
the transportation system. The purpose of this Transportation Master Plan Update is to
review the existing conditions of the transportation system and to address and/or resolve
transportation issues that have arisen since 1990. The following issues were included in the
original Transportation Master Plan and will be addressed and updated in this document:
· Vail Village Deliveries
· Town Bus System (specifically, the In-Town Shuttle)
Executive Summary ii Town of Vail
· Outlying Bus System
· Trail System Interface
· Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
· Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis
· Implementation Process
· Plan Monitoring and Updating
One issue addressed in the original document has been resolved since 1990 and is no
longer applicable to this update, and that is the Interstate 70 (I-70) Access.
In the original document, parking issues for the Town of Vail were also addressed. The
parking issues are also being addressed at the time of publication of this update; however,
the study is still underway and will be published as a separate document at a later date.
In addition to the updates in this document, new issues for the Town of Vail transportation
system have come to light. These will be addressed in this document and include the
following:
· Connecting fixed guideway transit systems
· Noise contour map for I-70 traffic
· I-70 capping review
· Traffic forecasting
· Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) issues resolution
Each of these issues will represent a different chapter in this document. In general, these
issues were studied and completed individually but are brought together in this document so
that all affected parties and agencies may view them as a whole system. This ensures better
coordination by all agencies in making the transportation system efficient for the present as
well as for the future.
Summary of Updates, Additions, and Resolved Issues
To provide ease of reference, each update and addition is summarized below with
recommendations, if applicable. The issues from the original Transportation Master Plan that
are either resolved or no longer applicable are also summarized below.
Updates:
Vail Village Deliveries
The Vail Village Loading and Delivery Study was researched and prepared for the purpose of
analyzing and understanding all the factors surrounding people and goods movement in and
out of the Vail Village Commercial Core One. The study and this summary provide options
and supporting background to help minimize or eliminate motorized vehicles (primarily
Executive Summary iii Town of Vail
delivery trucks) from the Commercial Core for the purpose of enhancing visitor enjoyment
and safety. Based on analysis of the present loading and delivery system and the available
options for the Commercial Core, short-term and long-term recommendations include the
following:
· Short-term
1. Use of Variable Message Signs (VMS) at key locations could direct skiers to the
parking structures and inform them of appropriate skier drop-off locations. The VMS
could also be used to direct loading and delivery traffic to available access routes,
loading bays, and dispersed terminals.
2. Consideration should be given to a ticketing structure that penalizes the repeat
offender of the loading zones in Vail while not affecting Village guests. First-time
offenders pay the maximum hourly rate, and the rate for each subsequent offense is
increased significantly.
3. There are several access points into the Village at the present time, only one of which
(Checkpoint Charlie) is able to control the entry of delivery traffic. Most delivery
vehicles enter the Commercial Core through Checkpoint Charlie, and many other
vehicles enter from the other three access points to the Village, frequently against
traffic. In reviewing traffic patterns, traffic flow, and entry access points to the Village,
it was discovered there might be some opportunity to further limit access to the
Village for all types of vehicles. By guiding vehicle entry to enforceable access points
throughout the Commercial Core, the overall traffic volume is dispersed over several
access routes. Further, the use of on-street loading bays can be better regulated.
4. The following planning and design function should be accomplished.
· An operational and technology plan should be drawn up to implement a traffic
management system based upon an electronic communication system that
integrates real time VMS, GPS tracking, smart card, internet computer
camera, and dispatch technology with operational and enforcement services.
· A long-range plan should be developed that when implemented in phases will
interconnect buildings with terminal facilities via back-of-house access routes
accommodating hand or motorized carts. The plan should be implemented in
conjunction with redevelopment of private property and streetscape
improvements.
· Amend loading standard in the zoning code to require enclosed (terminal)
loading and delivery bays for a variety of truck types and sizes as part of large
development and redevelopment projects. The excess capacity of each
terminal should be integrated through developer agreements into the
dispersed terminal system.
5. One issue that is a significant contributor to the problem of truck numbers and dwell
time in the Commercial Core is the time some deliveries are made. Earlier delivery of
goods could remove the majority of larger delivery vehicles from the Commercial
Core before “guest hours.” This approach would be most effective if instituted in
conjunction with improved signage and some changes in access and traffic flow in the
Executive Summary iv Town of Vail
Village. Stricter limitations could be put on Village access if delivery personnel could
complete deliveries to all establishments before 7:00 a.m.
· Long-term
1. Addition of several delivery bays as part of a dispersed terminal on the Land
Exchange site (the Vail Front Door project at the base of Vista Bahn/the Lodge at
Vail). To effectively service at least one-third to one-half of the Commercial Core, six
to ten bays for large trucks would be required.
2. Include enclosed dispersed delivery terminals in large development and
redevelopment projects. The Town should also seek opportunities to require or
acquire additional delivery bays in these facilities.
3. Provide strategically located, heated pedestrian walkways in the Village and adjacent
commercial areas, so that push hand carts, pallet jack size pull carts, and small
motorized carts can better function in the winter.
4. Where practical, construction or provision for future construction of underground
delivery tunnels with street level freight elevators to facilitate loading and deliveries
between buildings and dispersed delivery terminals should be done in conjunction
with large development and redevelopment projects.
5. Construction of a dispersed delivery terminal with one bay for large trucks or four to
eight bays for small cargo vans within an automobile parking structure on the P3&J
site on Hanson Ranch Road.
6. Change current zoning code requiring additional on or off-site storage requirements
per retail square foot for businesses in the Village.
7. Change current zoning code concerning required delivery space. The current zoning
code requires delivery space to be ten feet by 25 feet, which is not adequate. Bars,
restaurants, and hotels which require delivery of food and beverages should have
one to two or more spaces, twelve feet wide and 35 to 50 feet long. This would
accommodate most delivery vehicles. The code should allow for required loading
bays to be located in a nearby dispersed delivery tunnel.
8. Design dispersed delivery terminals in appropriate locations so that cargo from a
large truck can be transferred to a small cargo van. These would access a dispersed
cargo van delivery terminal or bay located closer to the delivery destination.
9. Increase the availability of close-in restricted parking spaces within controlled access
private parking structures. These would accommodate the delivery needs of
residents, maintenance and construction personnel, business owners, and parcel
carriers using small cargo vans and pick-ups. This will contribute to the reduced use
of on-street loading bays. Restricted parking spaces could be located in existing and
future parking structures built for automobiles.
Parking (summary to be provided by FHU)
To be completed as a separate document at a later date.
Executive Summary v Town of Vail
In-Town Shuttle Bus System
As a response to space limitations, driver shortages, and higher costs, the Town of Vail is
evaluating replacing the In-Town Shuttle buses with an alternative transit system. Such a
system would have to be capable of carrying 5,000 people per hour (the current peak
demand is approximately 4,000 people per hour) and effectively serve a route approximately
1.5 miles in length. The route would have to be similar to the current bus system route while
effectively maximizing both ridership and system operations. This update is to determine the
best options, from a range of opportunities, for providing mass transit for the Town of Vail In-
Town Shuttle bus route. These options are being presented to address the increased
demand and other issues discussed below on the In-Town Shuttle. The bus route is roughly
a three-mile loop from Vail Village to Lionshead.
The analysis of all potential options for the In-Town Shuttle system resulted in the following
technologies for final consideration:
· Power Unit/Trailer Combination Units
· Low-floor Buses
· Articulated Transit Buses
· Low-floor, Articulated Buses
· Guided Busway
· Automated Guideway Transit (AGT):
· SK
· Cableliner DCC
· Aeromovel
Based on analysis of the remaining technologies and input from two focus group meetings
attended by residents and businesses within the Town of Vail, a set of short-term and long-
term recommendations for the In-Town Shuttle bus route have been developed and include
the following:
· Short-term
1. Develop an Express Bus Route from Vail Village to Lionshead – Vail Transit should
consider an In-Town Express Bus route between Vail Village and Lionshead. This
route would run along the Frontage Road to provide for a quicker, more direct route
between the two areas. The express route could also make use of a low-floor,
articulated bus. In keeping with the character and space available in the Village Core
area, the In-Town Shuttle is better suited for the use of 40-foot buses. However, an
express route on the Frontage Road could utilize a low-floor, articulated bus to
increase the capacity.
2. Purchase Low-Emissions Vehicles - To address the problem related to smell/air
quality, Vail Transit should consider selecting buses that run on compressed natural
gas (CNG) and produce lower emissions.
Executive Summary vi Town of Vail
3. Improved Information Technology and Information Displays – Electronic message
boards which provide real time information should be placed at the Transportation
Center, as well as other key stops along the route. Real time information along the
route is extremely valuable to transit riders. Such information requires the
deployment of an automatic vehicle location system (AVL) to track buses (Vail Transit
already has such a system through NEXTbus). The AVL data can be converted into
bus arrival times, which can be transmitted to bus stops.
4. Extend In-Town Shuttle Route to Cascade Village – If demand warrants, the In-Town
Shuttle route should be extended west to serve Cascade Village. While discussion at
the two focus groups held on September 21st, 2001 indicated that the existing In-
Town Shuttle route should be extended to serve Cascade Village, Vail Transit should
conduct an on/off survey on its West Vail Green and Red routes to determine the
number of riders who currently board and/or deboard at the Cascade Village stop and
where they are coming from and going to, to better determine the level of demand for
a service extension.
Extending the In-Town Shuttle route to Cascade Village will add approximately one-
half of a mile to each run. This additional mileage would allow vehicles to complete
their loops in 50 minutes as opposed to the current 40 minutes, and would not add
any substantial cost to the service.
· Long-term
1. Develop Guided Busway – If the Town of Vail continues to grow as expected, and
capacity on the shuttle needs to be increased to 5,000 pph, Vail Transit should
consider the development of a guided busway to run between Lionshead and Main
Vail/Cascade Village. The use of a guided busway would allow vehicles to run on
shorter headways and therefore carry additional passengers during peak hours.
2. Install Transit-Activated Signal at High Volume Intersections along Frontage Road –
At intersections such as East Lionshead Circle and Frontage Road, buses have
difficulty making left-hand turns from the minor street (East Lionshead) onto the major
street (Frontage). The Town of Vail could look to install a transit-activated signal
system that involves detecting the presence of a bus and, depending on the system
logic and the traffic situation, then give the transit vehicle special treatment. The
system could give a green signal during peak periods for buses waiting to enter onto
the Frontage Road. In addition, real time control technologies can consider not only
the presence of a bus, but the bus adherence to schedule and the volume of other
traffic.
Outlying Bus System
This update includes a West Vail route structure review based on the West Vail Red Loop
and the West Vail Green Loop. Ridership, schedules, and route information are provided as
Executive Summary vii Town of Vail
well as short-term and long-term recommendations to streamline the existing route. Also
included in this analysis is discussion of a potential undercrossing of I-70 to be constructed in
the Simba Run area. In particular, the effects to the West Vail bus route from this
undercrossing are determined.
Recommendations for the West Vail bus route include the following:
· Short-term
1. Streamline Current West Vail Schedules – Vail Transit should change the current
schedules, so that buses operating on the West Vail Green and West Vail Red routes
depart at the same time. This would provide more balanced east-west service along
the North and South Frontage roads and alleviate safety issues generated by transit
users having to cross I-70 at-grade to access bus stops along the opposite frontage
road. In the winter, this would mean that buses on each route make their first
departure from the Transportation Center at 5:45 a.m. Streamlining these schedules
would also make the system easier to understand and utilize, which could generate
additional ridership.
2. Improved Route Identification – While each of Vail Transit’s routes have names and
are color-coded, a number, letter, or number and letter designation should also be
used to help lead passengers through a trip. The number, letter, or number and letter
designation, along with the route name should be displayed on each bus and any
printed maps. In addition, vehicles should have some indication of the direction they
are going (e.g. West Vail Green Red – North Frontage) so that the new riders can
better understand the system.
3. Elimination of Red Sandstone School Stop on West Vail Green and Lionsridge Loop
Routes – To make the routes in the West Vail area run more efficiently, two of the
routes, West Vail Green and Lionsridge Loop, should eliminate stopping at Red
Sandstone School. This route would continue to be served by the West Vail Red and
Sandstone routes. The elimination of this stop would reduce the running time of the
West Vail Green route and allow vehicles serving the Lionsridge Loop to reach their
primary service area faster.
4. Installation of Trailblazer Signs – Trailblazer signs that direct riders to the nearest
stop or stops should be installed on major streets and other key strategic stops
throughout West and East Vail. These signs would satisfy the need for approach
information, and thus should be compatible with route guidance information with
regard to location labels, directions, and route designations.
Metal trailblazer signs with the appropriate route guidance information can cost
anywhere between $500 and $1,000.
Executive Summary viii Town of Vail
· Long-term
1. Purchase of Additional Low-floor, Articulated Buses – If West Vail continues to grow
over the next few years as expected, Vail Transit should consider purchasing two
additional low-floor, articulated buses to handle the expected increase in demand.
These vehicles should be used on the West Vail Green and Red routes. Low-floor,
articulated buses have a 33 percent greater capacity than regular low-floor vehicles.
2. Incorporation of Bus Stops at Simba Run Underpass – While the use of the Simba
Run underpass to restructure the West Vail Red and/or West Vail Green routes will
not provide any service enhancement or increase in ridership, additional bus stops
should be located at each end of the proposed Simba Run underpass along North
and South Frontage Roads to improve passenger access to the system and increase
safety. These additional stops would serve the West Vail Red and West Vail Green
routes, as well as the Lionsridge Loop in the winter.
3. Incorporation of Stops at Lionshead Intermodal Facility – Following completion of the
Lionshead Intermodal Facility, Vail Transit should add this location as a stop on the
West Vail Green, West Vail Red, and In-Town Shuttle routes. The facility will include
significant parking and should become a key transfer point for transit service, which
will increase system ridership.
In addition to the West Vail bus route, a discussion of the Downvalley bus system (the ECO
system) is included. A bus service review is provided and includes information on routing,
schedules, and ridership as well as short-term and long-term recommendations to provide
more efficient routes.
Recommendations for the Downvalley bus system include the following:
· Short-term
1. Variable Lane System and GPS at Transportation Center – The transit plaza could be
changed to a variable lane system rather than the current assigned lanes for each
route. This would include a variable message system to direct buses into certain
decks when they arrive. This would allow for staggered bus arrivals, and therefore
add more capacity. The variable message system could be incorporated with a
Global Positioning System (GPS), a system that allows a central control system to
track the location of all buses at all times. This type of system would allow for greater
capacities of buses from downvalley routes rather than the current single lane that is
assigned for ECO routes.
Executive Summary ix Town of Vail
2. Express Service on Vail to Edwards Route – To reduce the travel time for commuters
and other passengers traveling from downvalley locations to Vail and generate
additional ridership, express service should be provided on the Vail to Edwards route.
This can be done by making some of the existing runs into an express run with limited
stops, or by adding an express run, which may require additional vehicles.
· Long-term
1. Impact of the IMC on the Eagle Valley Transportation System – If the IMC rail line is
constructed between Vail and the Eagle County Airport, two of the existing Eagle
Valley Transportation routes – the Vail to Edwards and Vail to Dotsero routes – would
essentially be providing redundant service. To eliminate this service redundancy and
make the system function better, these routes should be converted into a feeder
service, which would serve new rail stations in Edwards and Dotsero. Feeder routes
would be designed to serve residential areas in each town, with runs scheduled to
meet arriving and departing trains.
Trail System Interface
In the original Transportation Master Plan, the 1990 trail system is described and mapped.
Recommendations are also included for new trails to be constructed that would tie in with the
existing trail system and create a better-rounded system. This update provides information
on trails that have been built in the Town of Vail since 1990 (from the recommendations
made). Each new trail is described in terms of location and physical characteristics, and a
map is included to illustrate the locations of the new trails. In addition, the recommendations
made in 1990 have been re-prioritized to make a high priority of trail improvements that have
not yet been implemented.
In addition to the re-prioritization of the 1990 trail recommendations, the Town has also
identified additional trail links that it considers to be of high priority. These include the
following:
1. Lionshead Bypass – from the skier bridge in Lionshead, bypassing Lionshead, and
connecting to the existing trail system behind Tree Tops Condominiums
2. Vail Village Bypass – from Vail Road near Checkpoint Charlie, to Vista Bahn
3. Sunburst Road Bypass – from the golf course clubhouse to the west end of Katsos
Ranch Path
Appendix C1 is a portion of the Eagle County Trails Master Plan. This appendix is included
to illustrate how the trail system in the Town of Vail ties in with the Eagle County Trails
Master Plan.
Executive Summary x Town of Vail
For reference, Appendix C2 includes the trail maps from the original Transportation Master
Plan.
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
In 1990, peak hour traffic volumes were collected at 26 intersections along the Frontage
Roads in Vail. These counts were taken in March and July during peak weekends. This
update includes counts in 2000 at the same intersections in March and July during peak
weekends. The counts in 2000 differ because eight of the intersections from the 1990 counts
have been reconstructed as four roundabouts; two in West Vail and two in Vail Village, all
providing access to and from I-70. The results of the traffic counts are provided as Appendix
A1.
Appendix A2 also provides peak hour traffic counts completed by Felzburg Holt & Ullevig in
September 2000 for the Vail Village area. These counts were not conducted for the 1990
Transportation Plan but are included here for reference.
Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis
The LOS Analysis update provides LOS for the intersections studied in the original
Transportation Master Plan. This update also includes LOS for the newly constructed
roundabouts in West Vail and Vail Village.
All intersections along the Frontage Road were found to maintain a LOS of C or better, a
standard for the Town of Vail, with the exceptions of Vail Valley Drive West (LOS D),
Matterhorn Circle (LOS E), and Westhaven Drive (LOS F). Recommendations for these
intersections include the following:
1. Traffic signals. Although the Town of Vail has not used traffic signals in the past to
maintain the character of the Town, they are still a feasible solution and could be
considered.
2. Traffic directors during peak periods of travel.
3. Roundabouts at these intersections. Although the space requirements at the
intersections with poor LOS would indicate that roundabouts are not a feasible
solution, this possibility should be further examined, as roundabouts are effective
tools in creating adequate flow conditions at an intersection.
4. An all-way stop installed at the intersection (this would bring the LOS to C).
Implementation Process
The implementation process includes a scheduled plan of action for certain elements within
the Transportation Master Plan Update. Transportation system elements within the Update
should be prioritized as short-term (one to five years), mid-term (six to ten years), and long-
term (eleven to 20 years). Recommendations have not been made concerning priorities for
Executive Summary xi Town of Vail
the Town as priorities usually change, depending on what is most appropriate at that time.
The Town of Vail should develop a flexible plan for prioritizing the recommendations included
in this Update. This prioritization plan should remain open and flexible as any changes in
priorities may affect other plan elements. An individual chapter is not included to address
this element.
Plan Monitoring and Updating
The original Plan included continuous monitoring and periodic updates of the Transportation
Plan to include actions such as periodic traffic counts and a formal plan update every five
years. This update to the Transportation Master Plan serves the purpose of updating
changes that have taken place in the transportation system for the Town of Vail since 1990.
An individual chapter is not included to address this element.
Issue that is resolved and no longer applicable:
I-70 Access
In the original Transportation Master Plan, I-70 access was addressed because of the poor
traffic flow at two of the three interchanges (West Vail and Main Vail interchanges). The
report outlines the physical and operational characteristics of the interchanges, goals
regarding access to I-70, additional crossing capacity of I-70 at these locations, and
alternatives to solve the congestion problems at these interchanges. The issue has since
been resolved with the construction of roundabouts at these interchanges – two roundabouts
to replace the four intersections at West Vail, and two roundabouts to replace the four
intersections at Main Vail.
Additions:
Connecting Fixed Guideway Transit Systems
Two rail systems that have been proposed are the Inter-Mountain Connection (IMC) and the
Colorado Intermountain Fixed Guideway Authority (CIFGA). The IMC is a commuter rail that
would primarily use existing tracks and run from Vail to the Eagle County Airport. The
CIFGA system is a fixed guideway system that would run from Denver International Airport
(DIA) to Vail and eventually the Eagle County Airport. This addition to the Transportation
Master Plan addresses these two systems and how they would affect the transportation
system in Vail.
This chapter also includes recommendations for alignments and station locations in the Vail
area based on topography and proximity to activity centers. Mapping is provided in Appendix
E to show potential alignments for the fixed guideway system. Potential alignments for the
CIFGA system include the following:
Executive Summary xii Town of Vail
· Dowd Junction
The CIFGA alignment could enter Vail by way of Dowd Canyon on the existing Union Pacific
(U.P.) Railroad tracks. Just before the crossing of I-70 over Highway 6 (Dowd Junction), the
alignment would curve to the east, paralleling the existing bike path. At the point where the
bike path crosses under I-70, the alignment could follow one of two options. Option 1 would
be a tunnel cut through the slope of the mountain north of I-70. This option would parallel I-
70 until the entrance to West Vail, at which point the median opens up and the alignment
would cross over to the median. This option would be most beneficial if I-70 was not capped.
Option 2 would bring the alignment into the median under the proposed capping of I-70
through Dowd Canyon, in between the eastbound and westbound lanes.
Two other options exist for the alignment in the Dowd Canyon area. Option 3 through this
area involves the diversion of the alignment before Dowd Canyon. As I-70 curves to the east
and back before Dowd Canyon, the alignment could continue south (instead of curving back
west and into Dowd Canyon) and tunnel through into Dowd Canyon just west of West Vail.
At this point the alignment could cross into the median and continue into West Vail.
Option 4 for the Dowd Junction area includes following the existing rail line into Minturn and
then tunneling north back to I-70. This option would be considered because of potential
grade problems at Dowd Junction. Options 1 and 2 might face difficulties in creating a rail
line that could negotiate the steep grade at the intersection of I-70 and Highway 6.
· West Vail
For either option discussed above, the alignment would be in the median as CIFGA enters
West Vail. The CIFGA alignment would remain in the median, whether or not the capping
was to be constructed. A station location could also be constructed in the median for West
Vail access at a location determined to be the most practical. This station would include
pedestrian crossings to access areas north and/or south of I-70 and the Frontage Roads in
West Vail.
· Main Vail
The CIFGA alignment would remain in the median through Main Vail as well, with potential
station locations at the proposed North Day Lot Transportation Center in Lionshead and the
Vail Transportation Center for pick-up and drop-off of riders. These stations could be
constructed in the median of I-70 with pedestrian crossings to access areas north and/or
south of I-70 and the Frontage Roads.
· East Vail
The CIFGA alignment could also remain in the median through East Vail and continue east
outside of the Vail city limits.
As the IMC is proposed as an interim solution until completion of the CIFGA project, all
alignment recommendations might be temporary. These sections could be removed as
Executive Summary xiii Town of Vail
sections of the CIFGA project are completed. However, the IMC could also remain useful as
a local service, providing more frequent stops in Vail for downvalley commuters. Any
decisions regarding the temporary or permanent use of the IMC would be decided by the
Town of Vail upon further studies and public involvement. Recommendations for potential
IMC alignments include the following:
· Dowd Junction and West Vail
The IMC alignment would parallel the CIFGA alignment entering Dowd Canyon and traveling
through West Vail (using Option 1 or 2). Shortly after passing by the West Vail Roundabouts
and the potential station location in West Vail, the IMC alignment would leave the median,
crossing over to the area between I-70 eastbound and South Frontage Road. The alignment
would continue to parallel the CIFGA alignment.
· Main Vail
The alignment would continue to use the space between I-70 eastbound and South Frontage
Road, while sharing the potential station locations at Lionshead and the Vail Transportation
Center with the CIFGA for pick-up and drop-off. The IMC is proposed to end at the Vail
Transportation Center, at which point the line would go back downvalley along the same
route.
Noise Contour Map
This addition includes the creation of a noise contour map based on existing and future traffic
volumes in the I-70 corridor. Noise measurements were taken at 50 locations throughout the
Town of Vail to determine current noise levels produced primarily by I-70. These existing
measurements were used for the development of a noise model. The noise model accounts
for terrain features and traffic conditions. A future noise model was then developed based on
known development plans and traffic forecasts. The noise model includes planning level
noise abatement options.
A map of the noise contours with explanatory text will be included as a part of this section in
Appendix F2.
I-70 Capping Review
The Town of Vail has expressed the desire to explore other options to reduce noise levels
and bring a greater sense of community cohesion to the Town of Vail. Under consideration
is the “capping” of I-70. This would involve the tunneling of I-70 under the existing alignment,
using the land above for development or open space purposes. This addition to the
Transportation Master Plan provides an analysis of other capping projects completed
throughout the country, critical issues that the Town of Vail would face in considering such a
project, and recommendations for locations and land use in constructing a cap. Appendix E
provides mapping for potential capping areas along I-70 through Vail.
Executive Summary xiv Town of Vail
Traffic Model
From existing traffic counts, peak hour link volumes were documented and compared with
previous 1990 link volumes. Using this information as a base, a spreadsheet-based travel
demand model has been prepared for the Frontage Roads and major intersections in the
Town of Vail. The model forecasts future traffic based on socio-economic data (housing,
population, and employment). Eight traffic analysis zones have been used for the model and
these include the following: I-70 East, I-70 West, East Vail, Vail Village, Lionshead, West
Vail south of I-70, West Vail north of I-70, and Other Vail north of I-70. The model has been
set up for multiple forecast years, and ten and twenty-year forecasts have been conducted.
Appendices H1-H5 document the model structure and assumptions made.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) Issues Resolution
A PEIS was recently initiated by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for I-70
between Denver and Glenwood Springs (see I-70 Mountain Corridor PEIS, Summary of
Issues, J.F. Sato & Associates, June 2000). To prepare for this PEIS planning effort, issues
that could potentially affect transportation in Vail were identified and discussed during a focus
group attended by residents representing a wide array of interests and backgrounds. This
addition to the Transportation Master Plan identifies these issues and potential solutions to
the issues that have been recommended by the Town of Vail. The issues and solutions are
also presented in the form of a matrix to indicate how different solutions can potentially
address more than one issue.
Recent or Ongoing Studies
In addition to the studies described in this update, other recent or ongoing studies are taking
place in the Town of Vail. Some of these are summarized below.
Transportation Center Work in Lionshead
The North Day Lot Transportation Center is proposed in the Lionshead Redevelopment
Master Plan (Design Workshop, Inc., December 15, 1998). The Transportation Center would
serve to create a major new point of entry into the pedestrian and retail core of Lionshead. It
would also play a role in providing for a central transit stop in Lionshead.
The Transportation Center would consist of:
· Local/regional shuttles
· Local/regional transit and charter buses
· Short-term skier drop-off area
· Pedestrian portal
· Combination of large central service and delivery facility
· Construction under a structured parking deck
· Access to central Lionshead by freight elevators and a service tunnel
· Accommodation for a peak volume of 15-20 delivery vehicles and storage space
Executive Summary xv Town of Vail
The Redevelopment Master Plan views the Transportation Center as a priority project as it is
a prerequisite for other critical projects discussed in the Plan.
Roadway Functional Planning along South Frontage Road for Simba Run Crossing
The scope of work for this project involved conceptual design development for three
elements:
1. Improvements to the South Frontage Road between Ford Park and just west of
Cascade Village
2. A two-lane I-70 underpass at Simba Run
3. Related North Frontage Road improvements at the intersection of the new Simba
Run Underpass
Other elements of this project:
1. Feasibility of the improvements identified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master
Plan
2. Improvements to drainage at Town Hall and access control
3. Feasibility of the South Frontage Road realignment near the VA shops
4. Space and height constraints at the pedestrian overpass
PEIS Issues 10-1 Town of Vail
Chapter 10: PEIS Issues
The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) recently initiated a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Interstate 70 (I-70) between Denver and
Glenwood Springs. Several I-70 issues have been identified that affect the Town of Vail
and are relevant to the PEIS process. These issues were developed by the Town of Vail
from a citizen focus group. The purpose of this chapter is to document the issues
identified, discuss real and potential problems caused by these issues, make
recommendations for these issues, and provide input into the PEIS process.
Issues
Issues relevant to the Town of Vail that were raised from staff involvement and from the
focus group held September 28, 2000 included the following: noise, air quality, water
quality, fixed guideway opportunities, accessibility, congestion, safety, the East Vail
Interchange design, and transportation options. For each of these issues, comments
were raised to address the associated causes and/or problems. Potential threats to the
Town of Vail were then identified for each issue. Finally, solutions were proposed to
address these issues. Table 10-1 at the end of this chapter also shows these issues in
the form of a matrix. The matrix includes each issue and the solutions that might address
that issue. Most of the solutions pertain to more than one issue.
PEIS Issues 10-2 Town of Vail
Noise
Noise has become a concern for many Vail residents, due primarily to increasing traffic on
I-70. Comments raised through the input process include the following:
· Speeding. Many vehicles on I-70 exceed the posted speed limit through the Town of
Vail, creating higher levels of noise.
· High traffic volumes – a high volume of vehicles creates overall noise levels that are
unacceptable to the residents of Vail.
· Type of pavement – rough pavement on I-70 and rumble strips along the sides of I-
70 create higher noise levels through this area.
· Topography – the steep valley slopes keep more noise in the valley and result in
increased noise levels from I-70.
· Compression brakes on large trucks – Commonly referred to as “Jake-brakes,”
these are used to reduce speed on downgrades. These brakes create high levels of
noise and are used by trucks traveling west on I-70 on the downgrade of Vail Pass.
These factors may result in potential threats to the Town of Vail and its residents.
Property values may begin to decline if noise levels continue to increase, especially near
I-70. This may also result in lower development potential of the area in general. Quality
of life for residents may decrease if high levels of noise become constant from I-70. The
visitor experience may be negatively altered as well if the area is perceived as too noisy
and congested. Finally, health risks such as loss of hearing and increased stress may
also be associated with high noise levels.
Ways were discussed to solve noise problems along I-70 through the Town of Vail. Some
methods met unanimous approval while others were discussed only briefly. The solutions
discussed that met unanimous approval are as follows:
· Better enforcement of speed limits using techniques such as an increase in
enforcement personnel or issuing speeding tickets using photo radar.
· Lower the speed limit for trucks through the Vail area.
· No passing for trucks through Vail.
· A smoother, low noise pavement could be used on I-70 through the Vail area. This
would reduce tire noise.
· Sound barriers to block I-70 noise from the Town of Vail, if they are feasible.
PEIS Issues 10-3 Town of Vail
· Enforce the noise ordinance that is currently in place for the Town of Vail. This
could involve better coordination between the Town of Vail and the local or state law
enforcement agencies.
Some other opportunities to address noise issues were also mentioned but not
unanimously supported including the following:
· Alternative transportation routes for trucks and freight through the area to diffuse
the noise.
· Bury or “cap” I-70 through Vail. This would involve tunneling I-70 underground and
using the land above for development, open space, or other uses.
· White noise is a low-level noise used to mask louder noises. Residents or
businesses could use white noise to muffle the noise from I-70.
· Noise cancellation creates opposite and equal noise waves to cancel the noise from
automobile engines, based on the characteristics of each individual engine.
Some solutions for noise that will be described in further detail below include the use of
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), better construction management, and providing
incentives for using alternative transportation use.
Air Quality
Air quality has also become an important issue for residents of the Town of Vail due to
increased traffic volumes through the area. The Town of Vail raised comments specific to
air quality including the following:
· Burning brakes cause greater emissions of particulates and odor into the air,
causing a decline in air quality in the Vail Valley.
· Dust in the form of PM10 results from gravel used on the road for snowy/icy conditions
on I-70.
Problems with air quality create potential threats to the Town of Vail and its residents.
The threats addressed were found to be the same as those listed resulting from noise,
with the addition of several issues specific to air quality. In addition to the health of
residents of the Town of Vail, wildlife in the area could be adversely affected. The threat
of hazardous material spills by trucks transporting these materials could also create
potential air quality problems. Other hidden threats could exist as well, which are not
PEIS Issues 10-4 Town of Vail
always apparent in the short term; rather, they have the potential to affect the long-term
health of the community.
Opportunities to address air quality issues were also unanimous in some cases, with only
a few comments on others. Opportunities to address air quality issues that met
unanimous approval include the following:
· Diligent carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring. By constantly monitoring CO levels,
the Town of Vail will be better informed as to when levels are unacceptable.
· Decreased sanding of I-70 in snowy or icy conditions. Sanding the roads to increase
traction for vehicles traveling I-70 in these conditions creates high amounts of dust.
Alternative types of traction could be considered such as hard aggregate that gets
swept away instead of creating dust. Other types of deicers could also be used that
are more environmentally sound to decrease sanding while still providing a safe
roadway in snowy or icy conditions.
· Alternative transportation modes for people such as a fixed guideway system
would decrease the amount of vehicles on the road and therefore could reduce the
amounts of pollutants in the air.
· Alternative transportation routes for freight could be used to disperse the
emissions in the air. Instead of all vehicles on I-70 traveling the same route, trucks and
other freight vehicles could take an alternative route to reduce concentrated levels of
emissions in the corridor.
Other ideas mentioned to address air quality issues include fans or mechanical devices to
diffuse vehicle emissions in the Vail Valley along I-70 and the installation of a heated
roadway to reduce the amount of sanding necessary.
In addition to these solutions, some others that would address air quality described under
solutions for noise include speed enforcement, lowering the speed limits for trucks and
other vehicles, and capping I-70.
Some solutions for air quality that will be described in further detail below include ITS and
providing incentives for alternative transportation use.
Water Quality
Water quality is another concern for the Town of Vail because of increased traffic
volumes. Comments were raised by the Town of Vail about I-70 and the effect that high
traffic volumes are having on water quality. These include the following:
PEIS Issues 10-5 Town of Vail
· The source of the pollution into the waterways. Point source pollution is easier to
diagnose and control; but non-point sources, which can originate from I-70 and travel
to distant waterways, can often be difficult to diagnose and treat.
· Sanding of I-70. Once the snow and ice melts, the sand is blown into ditches or runs
off into waterways near I-70, creating sediment problems.
· Polluted run-off is a problem resulting from storm drainage, animal carcasses or road
kill, magnesium chloride used for deicing, oil and other hazardous materials from
vehicles traveling I-70, and litter.
Threats caused by these issues are once again the same as those common to noise and
air quality, with the addition of some specific to water quality. Polluted waters adversely
affect fish and plant habitat. This can be seen in declining numbers of certain species of
fish and plant life. Another threat is that the water flows to downvalley communities,
putting the health of the residents, wildlife, and plant life in those areas at risk as well.
Some opportunities to address these issues were raised briefly during the process, and
these include the following:
· A water treatment program for local waterways.
· An Adopt a Highway program to clean up litter and spills before they have a chance
to enter the waterways.
· Better maintenance of the area to keep the corridor free of litter, hazardous
materials, and/or other obstacles that might lead to the polluting of the local waterways.
In addition to these solutions, other solutions already addressed that would apply to water
quality include capping I-70, less sanding, alternative routes for freight, and heating the
roadway.
Some solutions for water quality that will be described in further detail include ITS, better
construction management, and providing incentives for alternative transportation use.
Fixed Guideway
The PEIS also addresses the idea of a fixed guideway (monorail) that would eventually
run from Denver International Airport (DIA) to the Eagle County Airport, under the
authority of the Colorado Intermountain Fixed Guideway Authority (CIFGA). Because the
guideway would travel through parts or all of Vail, the Town of Vail addressed the issue.
The main comment raised was that the fixed guideway would provide for a greater
capacity of people to travel to and from the area. The higher volume of people using a
PEIS Issues 10-6 Town of Vail
monorail and therefore not driving in their vehicles could lessen the threats to the
community mentioned for the preceding issues.
Some opportunities to address this issue and encourage people to use the monorail were
discussed, and these include the following:
· Provide services in the median for travelers using the fixed guideway system (in
those areas where the system runs in the median).
· Provide incentives to use the monorail such as discounted rates for certain groups
or periods of travel or a frequent users card that offers special discounts or free miles
after a specified amount of use.
· Coordinate with parking strategies in Vail. This could be achieved by locating
stations near existing public parking garages or lots in Vail.
· Make compatible with the types of uses for the community. For example,
because skiing is a primary industry in the Vail Valley, ski racks and luggage
compartments should be installed on the cars of any rail system. All types of use for
the area should be considered to encourage riders to use this type of transportation.
· Find alternatives to the addition of traffic lanes on I-70 through Vail. The Town of
Vail feels that widening I-70 is not the answer to congestion problems, and alternative
transportation solutions such as a monorail are necessary. Additional lanes of traffic
on I-70 could potentially limit opportunities for other transportation solutions in the
corridor in the future.
In addition to these opportunities, other solutions already mentioned that would apply to
the fixed guideway include capping I-70, alternative transportation modes for people, and
alternative transportation routes for freight.
Some solutions that would apply to the use of a fixed guideway system that will be
described in further detail include better driver education and ITS.
Other Issues
Other issues were discussed by the Town of Vail in less detail, while still retaining the
same level of importance. These are discussed below.
PEIS Issues 10-7 Town of Vail
Access
Access is not always consistent on I-70 from Denver to Vail (and vice versa) because of
construction delays, weather, congestion, and other unforeseen conditions. The Town of
Vail raised some comments concerning access. One of these is the economy of Vail.
Inclement weather, closures, or other conditions may create poor or no accessibility for
the Town of Vail. This may prevent people from visiting the area, and therefore, reduce
benefits to the economy.
Poor accessibility may also result in a poor guest experience. High travel times can
create frustration and a feeling of dissatisfaction with the overall experience.
Consequently, some of these guests may not make repeat visits.
Another comment concerning access involves the dependability of travel times along I-70
in the corridor. Travel times are generally inconsistent, depending on the time of day and
other unforeseeable conditions on I-70.
The Town of Vail discussed opportunities to address access. One solution was
unanimous while others were mentioned briefly. The unanimous solution discussed is
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). ITS is a way of managing transportation from a
broader perspective, stressing the fact that transportation involves more than just
widening highways. For a growing population, alternative methods of improving
transportation should be considered such as rail systems, improved bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, better management of existing systems, better management of
vehicles, and better management of transportation users. Some of these systems such
as fixed guideway systems can be run in almost all weather conditions and would not be
hindered by delays such as road construction or road closures.
Another solution is better communication. This includes better communication with
residents of the Town of Vail, travelers on I-70, and within agencies such as the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT). Improved information for travelers such as road
closures and congestion delays may alert a driver to make the trip at another time or use
another route, if possible. The various regional branches of CDOT may also benefit by
keeping all information consistent and updated through constant communication,
electronically and/or verbally. This can be done with centrally managed message signs,
radio, websites, and phone systems.
Better construction management during construction activities can also minimize delays
for improved access. By practicing efficient construction management techniques such as
performing the majority of the work during off hours or days, traffic congestion can be
minimized.
Other solutions already mentioned that also apply to access include capping I-70,
alternative transportation modes for people, alternative transportation routes for freight,
PEIS Issues 10-8 Town of Vail
providing services in the median, providing incentives for alternative transportation use,
and coordination with parking strategies in Vail.
Congestion
Congestion along I-70 is another concern for the Town of Vail. Congestion occurs under
many circumstances including peak hour periods such as post-ski area closure, accidents,
inclement weather, and construction delays. Congestion and traffic delays can reduce the
quality of life for residents and quality of experience for guests.
One solution that met unanimous approval for the Town of Vail is an Incident
Management Plan, a subset of ITS, to be managed by CDOT. Incident management
involves the anticipation and prevention of problems by assigning jurisdictional
responsibility for problems or incidents that may occur on I-70. This would require
coordination between several different agencies such as fire, emergency services, and
CDOT; all of which may be under different jurisdictions. In the event of an accident, the
Plan would designate a responsible party for that type or location of accident. Specific
procedures would be laid out for that party to follow in order to respond quickly and clear
out the accident to maintain adequate traffic flow.
Other solutions that have been mentioned previously that would address congestion
include alternative transportation modes for people, alternative transportation routes for
freight, other ITS, traveler communication, construction management, better CDOT
communication, providing services in the median, providing incentives for using alternative
transportation, and coordinating alternative transportation with parking strategies in Vail.
Safety
Safety has also become a concern for the Town of Vail. As an increasing number of
vehicles are traveling I-70 at high speeds, more accidents are occurring. In addition to
some of the solutions discussed above, another solution to this problem includes installing
guard barriers on I-70. These would prevent vehicles from crossing over into the other
lanes or driving over a steep drop during an accident.
Better driver education is a unanimous solution to create safer driving conditions. Many
drivers are unaware of the potential hazards that may exist on a roadway such as I-70.
By educating drivers about these hazards and how to avoid them, many accidents could
be avoided.
Other solutions already mentioned that would also apply to safety include speed
enforcement, lower speed limits, no passing for trucks through Vail, capping I-70,
alternative transportation modes for people, alternative transportation routes for freight,
PEIS Issues 10-9 Town of Vail
heating the roadway, incident management, other ITS, and providing incentives for using
alternative transportation.
East Vail Interchange Design
The Town of Vail also discussed the East Vail Interchange design. They feel that the
design needs to be reviewed in relation to the traffic volumes at that interchange.
One solution that was discussed is a redesign of the intersection. A more efficient design
could alleviate traffic problems by creating a better flow for the high traffic volumes.
Another solution for this issue that has already been mentioned is better CDOT
communication. Intersections such as this one with poor functionality should be made a
priority for local and state agencies.
Transportation Options
Transportation options involve creating or providing other modes or options to I-70
travelers. Some specific options include finding sources of funding for the CIFGA. CIFGA
would provide an alternate mode to private vehicles. Funding for this agency has not yet
been established for the creation of a mass transit alternative to I-70. Another option
includes giving the CDOT responsibility for finding an alternative route for freight carriers.
One example is the use of I-80 as an alternative route to I-70.
Solutions suggested for this issue that have already been mentioned include other
alternative transportation modes for people, alternative transportation routes for freight,
driver education on the benefits of alternate modes, ITS, traveler communication, better
CDOT communication, services in the median, providing incentives for using alternative
transportation, coordination with parking strategies, catering to types of uses for those
using alternate modes such as the CIFGA, and prohibiting the addition of traffic lanes to I-
70.
Conclusion
While the Town of Vail is not a large community in terms of population and area, the
community is an important part of the economy of Colorado. The ski area, recreation, and
retail industries are substantial contributors to the state. The issues discussed by the
Town of Vail are not necessarily specific to their community. These are issues that affect
many towns along I-70. With rising local and visitor populations, I-70 has been a source
of conflict and debate over solutions to relieve environmental, safety, and congestion
concerns that will only become worse with time if no action is taken. Alternative
PEIS Issues 10-10 Town of Vail
transportation solutions seem to be the most promising remedies for many of the
problems on I-70. The Town of Vail presents these issues with the hopes of creating
lasting solutions for the future of the community and other communities along I-70.
Issues
**
S
p
e
e
d
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
**
L
o
w
e
r
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
f
o
r
t
r
u
c
k
s
Lo
w
e
r
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
f
o
r
a
l
l
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
**
N
o
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
r
u
c
k
s
Re
r
o
u
t
e
t
r
u
c
k
s
**
L
o
w
n
o
i
s
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Bu
r
y
/
c
a
p
I
-
7
0
Wh
i
t
e
n
o
i
s
e
No
i
s
e
c
a
n
c
e
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
**
S
o
u
n
d
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
En
f
o
r
c
e
N
o
i
s
e
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
**
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
C
O
**
L
e
s
s
s
a
n
d
i
n
g
**
A
l
t
.
t
r
a
n
s
p
.
M
o
d
e
s
f
o
r
p
e
o
p
l
e
**
A
l
t
.
t
r
a
n
s
p
.
r
o
u
t
e
s
f
o
r
f
r
e
i
g
h
t
Fa
n
s
/
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
a
i
r
He
a
t
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
Wa
t
e
r
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
Ad
o
p
t
a
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
**
D
r
i
v
e
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
**
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
**
O
t
h
e
r
I
T
S
Gu
a
r
d
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
Tr
a
v
e
l
e
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
(
d
u
r
i
n
g
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
Be
t
t
e
r
C
D
O
T
c
o
m
m
.
Re
d
e
s
i
g
n
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
i
n
m
e
d
i
a
n
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
u
s
i
n
g
a
l
t
.
tr
a
n
s
p
.
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
Ca
t
e
r
t
o
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
u
s
e
**
N
o
m
o
r
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
l
a
n
e
s
Noise X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Air Quality X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Water Quality X X X X X X X X X X
Fixed
Guideway X X X X X X X X X X X
Accessibility X X X X X X X X X X X
Congestion X X X X X X X X X X X
Safety X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
E. Vail
Interchange
Design X X
Transportation
Options X X X X X X X X X X X X
Solutions
* Indicates unanimous support for these solutions by the Town of Vail.
Table 10-1: PEIS Issues and Possible Solutions
PEIS Issues 10-11
APPENDICES
A1 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, March 2000 and July 2000
A2 FHU Vail Village Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, September 2000
B1 Project Objectives and Criteria
B2 Technology Screening Process
C1 Portions of the Eagle County Trails Master Plan
C2 Trail Maps from Original Transportation Master Plan
D1 Intersection Level of Service
D2 Roundabout Level of Service
D3 Parking Garage Level of Service
E I-70 Capping and Fixed Guideway Mapping
F1 CDOT Noise Analysis and Abatement Guidelines
F2 Noise Contour Mapping
G FHWA Joint Development Study
H1 Population and Employment Data
H2 Traffic Volume Data
H3 Model Calibration
H4 Growth Model
H5 Trip Reassignment Work Table