HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB020401?0l4,l\Im
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Crlorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 f ax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Spriggs residence DRB Number: DR8020401
Project Descriptionl
Change to rear patio area
Participants:
OWNER l. Michael & Mary K. Spriggsl1/11/2002 Phone: 303-843-9911
1505 Cottonwood Lane
Greenwood Villagg CO
80121
License:
APPUCANT BraunAssociates, Inc. llllIl2002 Phone: 926-7575
D.H. Ruggles And Associates (Architect)
POB 2658
Edwards, CO
Dominic@braunassociates.com 81632
License:
Project Address= L477 ASPEN GROVE LN VAIL Location:
Legal Description: Lot: 3 Block: 2 Subdivision: LIONS RIDGE SUB. FIUNG
ParcelNumber: 210301415003
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: Date of Approval: 01120/2003
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: Bill Gibson DRB Fee Paid: $20.00
374-926-757 6oI1/67/2862 65:.AB BRA-r.r ASSrtrrAtrL PAGE 61
,r-m
Application for Design ReYiew
Depaftment of communty Lrevelogtnent
75 Sout?l Frwttaoe Road, vail colo6do 81657
tef : 970.479-.2139 la<'. 970.4''9'2452
ureb: t/,M\rr.ci.vail.co.us
Gsrcral Infonnatlon:
Ait gmjeds requ rg desig rwicw mlrst rcceive apPfovat p.ror.to suhnitthg a brdlding pefmlt apgftcat'on' Pleas€
refer b the sllw Eal r€4rre|nents br the particllar +pto"tr Urati-teqr*steC' t adttattT fu Desiln Revieil'
cannot be accepd unfl a[ Equrrcd inbfrnatton s gcerv{ Ui tti C"ttj"ry Dq,ebpment D€pattn€nl Th€
proJect may also n€ed to ua rJi""eO UV G T*rt Co,ncif .a#lor tne Plannl'E 'nd
Environm€ntal Commisdon'
Dc.ign revicu app'ovrt b,oo1;p} i lui6rtg p""t*t;Li* end construction commGn6es wittrln
onc ya.. of ttc rPPnDtEl'
Utg
,UI
Location of tlrc Pfropocal: tot: 3 Block':, 2 Subdivbion:
ewl Ad&c$: 1477 Asoen Grove Lane
lfrcc No': 21030r415u)3 (cor*act E€h @' Ass€ssor * 97G328-8640 for parcd no')
Zonil|gr SFR
il.mqs) dOwncr(s): Mike Soriogs
l,laiilng Addru3s! 5675 [IfC Bhd.- Suhe 17O'
[ , Z phon€: (303) 843-991L___________
Ormrr(s) Slgneure(s):
tlarm of
tleillng Addr€fs
f-rnanradress: 6mir$c@brLunasoLerruFax: e25-7576
fyp€ of Rsuaeu end Fec:
D Sign3
tr con€eoolal Retti('Y'l
O New Condructigl
D Additlon
B Mirlor Alt€ratim
(mtiti-hmdy/commercial)
l.tf, l'lirnr frlteraton- - [srngl€-ftmly/duplex)
,\ O"tg.onppoved f'tms
$650
$300
t250
$50 aus $1-00 per
'qua.e
foot of total sqn atea'
ilo Fee
$20
$20
No Fee
6y:
DRB No.:
For con*ruction of a nevr txsdrrg ot &mo/reunld'
il;;ffil"; ;tg" sqG" t<i*aq" rs added to. any resftJental or
.*"ilJJ6iiro.slincr,iao zso "dtnnns
& Itrterior conve(sldu)'
fil it inl"it-o uu*Jrrgs aru sia impro'enents' such as'
reno.fi"s,
-p"itiuttS,
wndour addidons. tardscatng' rences and
retarning walls, etc.
;;;t.#g"t to hrildinqs arld srte impmv€menB' sudt a5'-
;;#"s, p",it'tto, wrndow additbns, lard{aptng' f€nces and
retainrng walb, etg.i- roi-rlont'to ptam alr€adv eero'e.t bv Plantrhs suq.'g fE tV E I.lG's, r[tir""gdc. tr L
r'i l! .
At'! ''/ (r'7 '
lf Sepdatlon Requ€st
Proi?ct !b.:
\\r il.'
| ,4 ll, ltrt
,/ t' -)
ab"' ,lt ?, \"*
Request:
Mr. Spriggs on behalf of the current owners Mr. And Mrs Karle is requesting the Town
remove a deed restriction on 1477 Aspen Grove Lane.
The background on this property is confusing and sometimes conflicting at best:
However there are three key points which staff agrees on with the applicant
These are:
1.
the house without an exit to the exterior of the home. However, in the building plan
Town'placed a Type ll deed restriction on 1477 Aspen Grove Lane. The reason this
request is infront of you is that Will Miller asked the Town to place this deed
restriction on the property and we are the entity that can lift that deed restriction.
4. In placing this deed restriction on the property, theiouse, did not, let.me egnphasize
-did not-rJceive a 500 square foot GRFA credit -t / ." l€+ l./
a type ll EHU requires a conditional use permit which can be granted by
ey and a planner that is no longer with us made an
ha{ all EHU '\Me_re-a- use by right in
clear that a Type ll EHU does
reouire a conditional use.
After reviewing these sequence of events with Matt Mire and he has reviewed these
application with Tom Moorhead and Allen Christianson we believe that because the
On May 4rh 1gg4 Mr. Miller received DRB approval which did not include an EHU. .4 (
The property owner was approved with 3,830 square feet. The mpxirlum allowable L { \
square footaSe;pvrthout an EHU) is 4099 square t.ftrfuf t4,r4 ac, f I ' .,1,lr'rctu/L ( att tr il/ trr,/r{ ' . r\ t
On April26, 1995 the owner applied for a buildinj TJrnittora single family \ \ \ I
residence with a caretaker unit. These plans showed a kitenette on the first floor of \ \
U
z.
review process it appears that the plaqs changed and the kit-chenpttqcame gut.
1
3'3" o{n:,"G,^ rcHt# "*l{{,frtfi,(*:a "iffir(,r,, *h{"{.i' i(^#r,{^,# /z n a t'
44#-
t?lu
1)
2)
unit did not receive a GRFA credit and
There are several options available to you as outlined in the memo:
fr Take no action : this means you would deny this application and we would take not
further action and this question on the EHU would continue to linger untill the next
owner or oersoective buver tries to resolve the issue.
ffl oiru"t staif to iake enforiement action. Your legal counsel believes that they would
extremely difficult given the specific circumstances with this property.
5. In addition,
the PEC.
tnter
yr"t 17p.fl Ft/c,
becausewefee|thattherearep;ocpd9ra|f|awswiththeryn
the-site.that-thedeeffirrs $lOtrfd 6e problematic at best to enforce and we would
not be successful in forcing the current owner to create a type ll EHU on the
propeny.
4} Lift the deed restriction.
t
" ^l
Our recommendation, however unattractive it is to make, is to lift th"e deed restriction.
Another option we discussed was lifting the deed restriction with the condition that the
owner provide the Town with a deed restric{ed unjt ln a separate dwelling unit. This.was
ageeable to the applicant with the condition that he receives the 500 Fquare foqt-qredit - ..
for the residence on 1477 Aspen Grove Lan'e. Although aftractive we could find a way
with our current regulations to apply that 500 square feet to something other than an
EHU. However this may be an idea for future discussion when we next review the EHU
policies.
r I.':-r';.; .-'; . t:.'iJ,-
.,.', ., -, . .,. ..1. .::lt:
' ij i. 11.''. t o
r. .,.'.., r 11,
oo
6fi Fk
L,/ An, 17, 7 7 O
'/"
ltr lz,Sb fi = QlzsV (zsua\
, 6qi* (to'r"\ r \+ lzs creeir t:: fi (ce)
u;.!J,'E )3,yA o!fu-r**
lzg
I
1,o19 fr hh-