HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-09-12 WS VAIL TOVNN COUNCIL
���� ���$I��
�fl9ES�t�V, $ept@P'�ab@� ��y �000
�,0� P.�. A�' �'O!! COlJR6C9L CHAiVIBERS
f�O�f�: Tuo�ue o� u�e�s us �ppu��xaanate, sub�ect�o change, arac➢ can�aot be
u�e9oedl aaQ�oov go ��te�u�uaa�e a4�rha� �iane Couo�coB wrall coa�sicle¢� �� u�es�.
1. Local Marketing District Board of Directors Quarterly
Ross Boyle Meeting. (30 mins.)
2. Town Council call-up of the Design Review Board's denial of
Allison Ochs a deck expansion, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road
(Vista Bahn Building)/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1St Filing.
(40 mins.)
ACT�O� REQ�.➢ESTED OF COl1NCel.: Uphold, overturn, or
overturn with conditions the Design Review Board's denial of
the deck expansion at the Tap Room.
1����GRO��� 9�A�90NA�E: Please refer to the staff
memorandum
STAFF RECOMNiENDATIOfV: The Community Development
Department recommends that the Town Council uphold the
Design Review Board's denial of the proposed deck
expansion subject to the following findings:
That the addition does not meet the intent of the guidelines
as established by Section 12-11-5 (Design Guidelines) of the
Town Code as outlined in the staff memorandum.
That the deck addition does not meet the intent of the
guidelines as established by the Vail Vilfage Urban Design
Guide Plan as outlined in the staff memorandum.
3. Parking Discussion. (1 hr.)
Greg Hall
Arnie Ullevig AC��O� (�EQfl.➢ES�ED OF COl9�UC6�: Continue to provide .
direction to the parking discussion items based on policies
� that the parking plan should meet.
��C�G9�OV9B�� RAT90BVA�E: Vail Resorts Inc. and the
merchants discussed long-term needs with regard to
parking. The town is currently short up to 1000 spaces. We
have identified policies that the overall parking plan should
meet. Enclosed is a parking plan to meet those policies as
prepared by the town's consultant.
S�A�f� IRECO�IMENDt4��0�9: Participate in discussions,
determine what additional information is needed, and what
further options are required to bring back for review of the
overall parking policies.
4. Executive Session - White Water Park Litigation. (30 mins.)
Tom Moorhead
5. Contribution Requests. (45 mins.)
Steve Thompson
BACKGROUND RATIONAL: In your packet are the actual
requests for Y2001 contributions plus a spreadsheet for you to
enter the amount you would like to grant the various groups.
Please turn these into Pam first thing Tuesday afternoon so that
averages of all the Councilmembers can be tabulated. Also
included on this spreadsheet is the Town Manager's
recommendation for funding.
In regard to the request for funding from the Vail Valley Tourist
and Convention Bureau (WTCB), please note there is not a
"manager's recommendation." Staff needs to further understand
items in this request before a recommendation can be made from
staff. Therefore, this item will be slated for later discussion.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Complete the contribution
funding spreadsheet and return to Pam at the beginning of
Tuesday's work session.
6. Appointment of 501(c)3 and 501(c)4 Committee Members
Russell Forrest for the White River Institute's Hub Site Efforts. (5 mins.)
BACKGROUND RATIONAL: At the special Council meeting
on Thursday, September 7th, Council members indicated
preferences to serve on either the 501(c)3 or 501(c)4
committee in regard to the White River Institute's efforts for
the Hub Site.
ACTION 12EQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Vote for two
members for EACH of these committees. Turn ballots into
Pam at the beginning of the work session this coming
Tuesday.
7. DRB Report/PEC Agenda and Report. (5 mins.)
Allison Ochs
Brent Wilson
8. Information Update. (10 mins.)
9. Council Reports. (10 mins.)
10. Other. (10 mins.)
11. Adjournment. (6:05 P.M.)
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOVII:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUfVCIL REGULAR 1IUORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/19/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL
CF9AMBERS.
T�iE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL RECULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/26/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL. BE ON TUESDAY, 9/19100, BEGINNIIdG AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
<
e
fi�EiViORANDUii�
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 12, 2000
SUBJECT: A Town Council call-up of the Design Review Board's denial of a deck
expansion, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road (Vista Bahn Building)/Lot
C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 St Filing.
' Applicant: Remonov and Company, represented by Knight Planning
Services
Planner: Allison Ochs
I. BAC6CGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
According to the Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook the Design Review
Board is:
The body responsible for reviewing development proposals in the Town of Vail.
The Design Review Board focuses on evaluating projects based on the Town
Code, Master Plans and the Design Standards as set forth in the Town Code,
including architectural design, site p�anning, landscaping, site disturbance, etc.
On May 15, 2000, an application was received for a conditional use permit to allow for •
the addition of a deck to the Tap Room, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Rd. An outdoor
dining deck is a conditional use in the CC1 Zone District. The deck extended beyond
the property. line of the Vista Bahn Building, onto Vail Associates property zoned
Agriculture and Open Space. Vail Associates allowed the encroachment through an
easement. The deck also extended onto the Town of Vail stream tract. On June 12, the
Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the Conditional Use Permit. The
Planning and Environmental Commission had concerns about the effect of the use on
adjacent residential uses and its proximity to an adjacent private deck. The request was
tabled, with direction from the Planning and Environmental Commission to investigate
providing more of a buffer to adjacent properties and to go to the Design Review Board
for a conceptual review on the design of the deck. On June 21, 2000, the Design
Review Board conceptually reviewed the deck expansion. The following were their
major concerns:
1. The deck will create a dark and uninviting space for the pedestrian flow
that was intended with the original building design.
2. The board generally felt that the angles of the deck were out of character
with the existing building. Instead, the board felt that they would be more
�,
1
TOWN OF VAIL �y
,
supportive of expanding the existing decks and opening up the restaurant
more to the outside.
_ 3. The board felt that the deck would create a dark, wet entrance to the ski
lockers. They also felt that the proposed head height created would not
be conducive to people carrying skis.
4. The board felt that using up all of the availabie space was not an elegant
solution. The proposed deck introduced a vocabulary unfamiliar to the
existing building.
5. The board also expressed concerns about the proximity of the deck to the
adjacent residential use.
These concerns were forwarded to the Planning and Environmental Commission at the
July 10, 2000 meeting. At the July 10, 2000, Planning and Environmental Commission
hearing, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved the Conditional Use
Permit for the outdoor dining deck with the condition that the deck would go no further
than the western portion of the stucco pilaster (see attached plan). The Planning and
Environmental Commission also noted tfiat the Design Review Board would reviEw the
architectural elements of the application, as the Planning and Environmental
Commission's role was to focus on the use. The staff inemorandum and minutes of the
Planning and Environmental Commission meeting have been attached for reference.
When the applicant returned to the Design Review Board meeting on August 2, 2000,
the applicant had not addressed any of the concerns of the Design Review Board that
had been discussed at the conceptual review. A motion was made to approve the deck
addition, and a tie vote resulted. A tie vote is equivalent to a denial.
The denial was then called-�p by the Town Council. Though the call-up was originatly
scheduled for September 5th, the item was tabled to the September 12th Town Council
meeting. Following the Town Council call-up, the applicant submitted an appeal of the
Design Review Board decision. Their statement of appeal is attached for reference.
II. STAFF RECOMiVIENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council uphold
the Design Review Board's denial of the proposed deck expansion subject to the
following findings:
1. That the addition does not meet the intent of the guidelines as established k�y
Section 12-11-5 (Design Guidelines) of the Town Code and outlined in Section III
of this memorandum.
2. That the deck addition does not meet the intent of the guidelines as established
by the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and as outlined in Section tll of this
memorandum.
2
191. APPLICABLE DESiG� GU9DELINES
Design Guidelines:
1. Structures shali be compatib/e with existing structures, their surroundings, and with
Vail's environment. It is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be
compatib/e. Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of sca/e,
proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and compliance with
the guidelines herein contained.
Staff Response: The Design Review Board and staff believe that the proposed deck
is out of context with the existing structure. The deck is out of scale with the existing
decks and balconies. The Design Review Board specifically felt that the angles of
the deck were out of character with the existing building. The proposal does not
meet the intent of the Design Guidelines.
Urban Design Guic�e Plan:
1. Pedestrianization - A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian
circu/ation through an interconnected network of safe, p/easant, pedestrian ways.
Staff Response: The Design Review Board and staff believe that the deck creates an
uninviting pedestrian space. The deck creates a very dark entrance to the ski lockers,
and fails to maintain the openness of the pedestrian path around the east side of the
building. The praposal does not meet the intent of the Urban Design Guide Plan with
regards to pedestrianization.
2. Decks and Patios - Dining decks and patios, when praperly designed and sited, bring
people fo the streets, opportunities to /ook and be laoked at, and generally contri6ute
to the live/iness of a busy street—making a richer pedestrian experience than if those
streets were empty. Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due
consideration to:sun, wind, views, pedestrian activities.
Staff Response: The Design Review Board and staff believe that while this is an
appropriate location for a deck, the deck must also be properly designed and sited.
The current proposal is out ofcontext with the architecture of the existing building,
creates an uninviting pedestrian experience, and severely darkens and spoils the
entrance to the ski lackers. The head height created by the deck makes it difficult for
pedestrians carrying skis to pass through. The proposal does not meet the intent of
the Urban Design Guide Plan with regards to decks and patios.
Vail Village IViaster P9an
Goal 1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural
scale of the village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity.
Staff Response: The Design Review Board and staff believe that the deck is out of
character with the existing architecture of the Vista Bahn Building. The proposal does
not meet the intent of Goal 1 of the Vail Village Master Plan.
Goal 2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around economic health
and viability for the Viltage and for the community as a who/e.
3
2.4 Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity where
compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Commercial infill development consistent with established horizontal zoning
regulations shall be encouraged to provide activity generators, accessible
greenspaces, public plazas, and streetscape improvements to the pedestrian
network throughout the village.
2.4.2 Activity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both the guest
and the community shall be encouraged.
Staff Response: While staff believes that the use of the deck meets the above
objectives and policies of Goal 2, staff does not believe that these over-ride the
importance of the architectural considerations of the Vail Village Master Plan as stated in
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan.
Goal 3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of fhe walking experience
throughout the Vil/age
3.3 Encourage a wide variety of activities, events, and street life along pedestrian
ways and plazas.
3.3.2 Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and shall be encouraged in
commercial infi/l or redeve/opment projects.
3.4 Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways, and accessible green
space areas, including pocket parks and stream access.
3.4.1 Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream tracts shall not further
restrict public access.
Staff Response: While staff believes that the above objectives and priorities are
applicable to the proposed deck addition, staff believes that proper siting and design are
integral to any development. The Design Review Board and staff feel that the currPnt
proposal does not meet the intent of Goal 3 of the Vail Village Master Plan.
Intent of original design (from the original application to the Town of Vail)
"The creation and enhancement of the Mill Creek area as an important connector link
will alleviate skier congestion at peak hours on the west side of the Golden Peak House.
The opportunities to direct pedestrians a/ong the Mill Creek improvements will assist in
improving the aesthetics in fhese strategic areas."
Staff Response: As part of the original design concept of the Vista Bahn Buildirig, the
architect described the importance of the pedestrian link from the ski yard, around the
eastern portion of the building along Mill Creek. The Design Review Board and staff
believe that the deck is in direct contrast to the original design concept as specified by
the original architects of the building. The proposal does not meet the intent of the
original design, as specified by the architects.
4
i ,.
�. �I �;;, - y � ��;, �.
I!7 6
::.� :Ii 4 , :: . . �
.�.y�' �'�i
�; ;'� -_'��E�J�i�r:������- ;, _— ..
7L.: ' _ _ , .. . �} -� ,
�r�* - �!��y'„ ' . ' . .
,i i. � Iv ���
;,_ z ,.
� � ,;�
q:F3, �Ti I�
ii?r`� � . . . . .?i i��„7... +�� .
u �
gj. , ., �.)`� f� i.I
I;.
c;� I , K � !�I
� �I�
� l : . _r :.,
� , �,
��; tY�W L�ECK.LIN� ._,:.__�
�5.. _._ �'. .. ..i;�
�.,
t . f��I�
i
�� R,,'i ,�_���?'.;STINC�L4%�C'ctr
�' � FK EY�f1GY1
�, � �il
�:�, � . � . � .: . _;�i..� ... . ..,.
. .. ... I��
i., Xf9Y, . ( I
!RACr E �dM� F
�. ,�.
,}
c�,._ � _
'_.. �$9 �
,,,_-- --- --- >
:
� `"�- .,� � °�� a ,
�,
� � � �^` _
:, *� _ F
" � _ ,
:. , . �'`YEa... .._ :.. ` !., � �i
/ � '�,, , , ,I .c�.
,/' / ; °.� . , . - �
�� �-� :_ ..a�_
,
`
(� f�
�
� '! �
r
, / il',t� � c 1 I II . � � �
I '1`� '' � _i__��;__.; , .��` I`�� _. .,
/ , . � �r� , . .... ���777, �1�1. _ i � . ...... �..:.
� � . �� ... . ,�. �I�. .k�,.` __.
�
� .� �`�.: �l ' t- � t-.' , �\ ._
� F � i S �
� �,� �+}i �� I s �` ?� � : o �
� ,
_. '
, �; r , , _ :,�, __.
,,- r � ,� -- :_. _ � ,`�
I �.��� I� l .- `� ��
� _, �:? . \�`.-,.
''`, /� ,
_ - . � �
/ _ � � :�- — -. :'
_. _... ,-. ......_ . ;. ... ... � . F-- . ,. .. __ -
- � �`.� � �� �� __� � �
� ' ( ��
C•Y. ` -1��-' � 1 . umvm�mao�e+�rwae�+ o�e�r� �ma.w
�\\ �_`l.J��,.i.
�!`!-1� t'� �C\ti--('�! � �.
� r�� C�� �'•r i 1(�_ `, ' .. � .
/
��> > _
_} �
��� . _
._
1 _
_ _---- �--y,
�--_-__ _____ _� ����
_ _____--___ 1
N�cn c�7yi�c�r;�.t�m;p�
. I ,°i°I'�xRt4TE Pi�r'+�dbay@.1:—....__.__.__.,._'--. .
(
' r '
� 1
MEMORANDUM -
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: June 12, 2000
SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the establishment of outdoor
patio dining and seating, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road (Vista Bahn
Building)/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 15` Filing.
Applicant: Remonov and Company
Planner: Allison Ochs
I. DES�RIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The Vistsa Bahn Building is proposing an outdoor dining deck to be located at 333
Hansan Ranch Rd. / Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 St. The establishment of outdoor patio
-� dining is a conditional use in the CCI Zone District. The deck addition will allow for '
outdoor seating for the Tap Room Restaurant. The deck addition will be reviewed by the
Design Review Board for compfiance with the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow for the
establishment of an outdoor patio dining deck, based on the following findings and the
criteria outlined in this memo:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district
in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or �
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
I
��
,„ ,
TOWN OF YAIL �i ;
' 1 �
Should the Planning and Environmentai Commission choose to approve this conditionai
use permit, staff recommends the following condition:
1. That the proposed deck encroachment is entirely removed from the Town of Vail
Stream Tract or resolved with the Town Attorney prior to Design Review Board
approval.
II1. ROLES OF THE REVIEI�/9NG BOARDS
Planninq and Environmental Commission: The Planning and Environmental
Commission is responsible for evaluating this conditional use permit application for.�
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities,
utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public
facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian
safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and
removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located,
including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental
impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title.
7. Conformance with development standards of zone district
Desiqn Review Board: The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating the
Design Review application for.�
1. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings
2. Fitting buildings into landscape
3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography
4. Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation
5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site
6. Acceptability of building materials and colors
7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms
8. Provision of landscape and drainage
9. Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures
10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances
11. Location and design of satellite dishes
12. Provision of outdoor lighting
13. The design of parks
IV. CRITERIA Ai�D FI�DINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERfiAIT
Upon review of Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulations, the Community Development
Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit request to ailow for the
establishment of the outdoor dining deck at the Vista Bahn Building based on the
following factors:
2
A. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of
the Town.
Staff believes the applicant's proposal is in concert with the Town's
development objectives and will have minimal impacts on existing or
potential uses in the surrounding area.
The following development objectives of the Town are listed in the Vail
Village Master Plan and staff believes are relevant to this proposal:
2.1 Recognize the variety of land uses found throughout the Village
and allow for development that is compatible with these
established land use patterns.
3.3 Encourage a wide variety of activities, events, and street/ife along
pedestrian ways and p/azas
3.3.2 Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and
shall be encouraged in commercial infill or redevelopment
� projects.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that the proposal will have minimal, if any, negative impacts
on the above-described criteria.
3. Effect upon traffiic with particular reference to congestion,
automotive and pedestrian safiety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the
street and parking areas.
Staff believes there will be minimal, if any, negative impacts on the
above-described criteria
�. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
Staff believes that the proposal has many positive aspects and that the
character of the area will be enhanced as a result of the proposed
improvements. Los Amigos has an outdoor dining deck similar to the
proposed Tap Room deck. As this site is adjacent to the ski yarci, staff
believes this will be an amenity to the public. However, staff recoc�nizes
that there are residential uses adjacent to the proposed outdoor dining
deck. All Town of Vail noise ordinances are applicable to this site. As a
conditional use permit, the Planning and Environmental Commissian has
the ability to revisit the conditions imposed upon it, should any cc�nflicts
arise between adjacent uses.
3
B. FII�DINGS
The Planninq and Environmentai Commission shall make the foliowinq findings before
qrantinq a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes
of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located.
2. That the, proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
4
r
Description& Compatibility
The proposed project consists of an exterior deck extension on the south side of the second floor
of the Vista Bahn Building. The purpose is to provide outside seating for the Tap Room
Restaurant.
This addition meets development objectives of the Town of Vail by providing outside restaurant
and bar area thereby increasing existing commercial use in properly zoned areas.
The design of the deck has been carefully done to be compatible with features of the existing
building. For example the deck rail will be identical to that which currently exists on the
building. Also the deck is designed to respect the existing stairways,walkways and first floor
patio. Landscape materials consisting of two trees and some small shrubs will be relocated on
site.
In addition to the physical compatibility efforts, the compatibility of the proposed use will b�
assured. There are some residential uses adjacent to and above the proposed deck. Our team is
r
contacting owners to resolve any issues.
Positive impacts are anticipated. An increase in food and beverage service at the base of the ski
mountain will be a public benefit. As this is limited to outside space, increase in the times of use .
will be limited.
No additional parking will be needed. Also pedestrian and vehicular traffic will not be imp�cted. '
�
i
,
,
I
�
�
�
��
� �y� �
� U e
Q � �
� �
ew�e s,�r�oor� � � � �s
���.�� a� � � 8 �
e.� , �y�{
m o.°�r z xv 7�r�
� � � - TdIR 9 �
L� erau.�
� �. m i
� ur w a �
m
^� o
� \�II
xu� � @
III�� LNtlE �.
�a-are ue I� arcwe�
t.rr roer �
�
o��er.
TR4CT E � ur�' \ w' D
d g�q,, , '�
n� �
� �c �o .
p� o
r�+xaenar eraw�r,a
. , �, z
� .�a ��.� � om� � � � 0-
� � � a aA r�ccw "� �
e O . O �W YW.L6 (1 �
\�
/ ` o W W
a� � � � � 0
1�313 w m �� � .e � m � � m m
�yro��me�b � �
�� MATERIALS: ""
� I tFrncr u O DEGG . � _I
BTAMr°ED CC�JCf'd.+TE
TOLLN OF YAIL TO MATGiI EXIBTItYs � Q
/ RAIL� Z
CEDAR t0 FWTCH
EXIOTMG
' �R > O
T�' NEW R.41LMC+i0 HATCH EXIBTNG W U
� w
. E—� `�
�
981m
��.�
exr.ee
OfiH ]4 A►RIL Op
A H{T meJ
' SECOND L�v�L EX7ERIOR DEGK GONS7RUCtION PLAN �1
a.4 • , `'_`�_'^' _�`�` rw! �
����_.� � . - .. •� . � I t� � `��':���
I I �� ^'� \ � `� _ , 1t' -i�.�~� '�'-�`�
. _-+ --}- i . t / �_ii!,�.u.j .�� �
� � � .' � j l . 1 � � ' G ` I ~ . .
/ i? �� I
E L t _4k!_ � ' � (1 � f � 3 , . : �
E..1 - .. � � :L�J � � I � t '�
R�: 18/,Aq,! � . . _ • i
!''S1l1�GCA �-- � i� ' � � 5 '. ~� , j �
�,,-.�. , . . � , ;J F�9.4 . 1 :
�
� �s'��,'., ree � r __. . ._,..--- -- - � ---�----; �
� ' � ' � � � \
J k t , i �_ . �
' .11�_ � - - . r � . � _ !' " �
��� � . , 1 \ • � / � � �^� �/^A p� � �' �l� \_} �
. � � � j -b 7�
• � � � � � � b � �� � `�
I . � � � ru � _ ! hq.4
� ;' � £ �f 31� i ."2t2 �j I � •
I � � 1 �� � � � S
'� .. \
1 � `
{ � `
� ��:��'�-�)d%AA I -
` ' ! ��1�'� '-� ��.'i r,.;:y�+�c«(
k�'l t .� Jr°7"��, �'-'� ���-„c= ,_ �.�"`T,r��--,-- - 1�i{$.YNC ., —� . .�'�q � � ��. �� T�"�—' .�i .
/ � "�1.�. t �s i-." \_'.',}1 �_�
_...._ ' �f ����������`� �.��
?. 1-.
T sri�r;F�i:4LL STQNt.w',�1LL BLCK TU I3E S[IPPORTrv
` B��sro�r_wncL
� 51GI�i FOK RE5TAURl�1�T (V.I.F.}iGIGEiT OF wALL)
�_.... "7AP R(1011"
Approved June 26, 2000 .
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June 12, 2000
Minutes
MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Galen Aasland John Schofield George
Ruther
Chas Bernhardt Diane Golden Brent Wilson
Brian Doyon Allison Ochs
Doug Cahiil Ann Kjerulf
Tom Weber Judy Rodriguez
Todd Oppenheimer
Public Fiearinc� 2:00 p.m.
Galen Aasland called ihe meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. �
1. Swearing in of PEC member Tom Weber - Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk.
Galen Aasland mentioned that item #5 had been withdrawn.
2. A request for a conditional use permit to construct a Type II Employee Housing
Unit, located at 2490 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 17, Block 2, Vail Village 13`h Filing.
Applicants: Mary & Sonny Caster, represented by Ben Aguilar
Planner: Ann Kjerulf
Ann Kjerulf gave an overview of the staff inemo.
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant had anything to add. The applicant had nothing to
add.
Galen Aasland asked if the public had any comments. There were no public comments.
Doug Cahill asked if there was an exit door from the garage to the EHU.
Ben Aguilar said you would have to exit the garage and go outside to get to the EHU.
Doug Cahill suggested an access door from the garage to the EHU.
Tom Weber had no comments.
Brian Doyon said he was concerned with Condition #2, reducing the curbcut.
Ben Aguilar explained that the cut was reduced by 20'.
Ann Kjerulf said the DRB made the condition part of their approval .
Chas Bernhardt had no further comments.
Galen Aasland asked if rents would be removed from the deed restriction.
Planning and Environmental Commission 1
Minutes
June 12, 2000
Approved June 26, 2000
Brent Wilson said the Town of Vail has no cap on rents.
Brian Doyon made a motion for approval, in accordance with the staff inemo.
Doug Cahill seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
3. A request for a conditional use permit, to aliow for the installation of wireless
telecommunications rooftop antennas & a public service use within the Brandess
Building, located at 2077 N. Frontage Road (Brandess Building)/Lot 39, Buffehr
Creek.
Applicant: Jayne Brandess Revocable Trust
Planner: Brent Wilson
Brent Wifson gave an overview of the staff inemo.
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant had anything to add. The applicant was not
present. He then asked if there were any public comments.
Charlie Clark, a resident of 29 Zermatt Lane, Unit H, stated that he didn't want the
antennas to be huge.
Brent Wilson explained the antennas and said they were 4' tall and quite small. He said
the Design Review Board would address the aesthetics.
Tom Weber said his only concern was that they should be concealed behind a louver
and it should be part of the PEC approvaf.
Galen Aasland asked how past applications were required to screen.
Brent Wilson said we would have to be consistent with the Design Guidelines and we
could forward that as a suggestion or condition.
Brian Doyon agreed with enclosing the dumpster and the cupola, but said he was not in
favor of bumping out and suggested re-angling with brackets painted to match.
Chas Bernhardt asked stafif who the applicant was.
Brent Wilson said the applicant was the Brandess Building.
Doug Cahill said he agreed on the screening and dumpster enclosure.
Galen Aasland said the application was appropriate and complies with Town Zoninc�.
Brian Doyon made a motion for approval, in accordance with the staff inema.
Doug Cahill seconded the motion.
' The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
Chas Bernhardt asked if we shouldn't recommend the.wingwall change to the DRB.
Brian Doyon said we don't need more bulk and mass.
Planning and Environmental Commission 2
Minutes
June 12, 2000
Approved June 26, 2000
Brent Wilson said the PEC should suggest the bulk and mass be minimal and we should
leave the screening to the DRB.
4. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the establishment of outdoor
patio dining and seating, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road (Vista Bahn
Building)/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 15� Filing.
Applicant: Remonov and Company
Planner: Allison Ochs
Galen Aasland mentioned receiving a letter from Mr. Hughes that had been fedexed to
the Town. He the disclosed, for the record, that while on a site visit, the applicant just
showed him directions without influencing him.
Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo.
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant had anything to add.
Tom Bonnie, from Knight Planning Services, said he became aware of the encroachment
of the deck on some land and wanted to work out with the Town Attorney on an
easement agreement. He then explained a rendering of the deck and the importance of
the deck expansion. He said he was pleased with the interaction with the Town of Vail
staff.
Galen Aasland asked if there was any public comment. There were no public comments.
Tom Moorhead said he was prepared to answer any questions about stream tract land.
He said that the land was given to the Town of Vail within the last 3-4 years and was very
restrictive. He said there was a provision for any improvements saying that Vail Resorts
had to be a party to those improvements or they would take back the land and so Vail
Resorts would decide the appropriateness . He said dining decks were an appropriate
amenity and there were dining decks adjacent to private residences, but there were
sound ordinances in place if it became disruptive. He then said anyone who owns
residential property in CC1 shoufd anticipate this activity.
George Ruther gave the list of planning documents that encouraged the mix of lodges,
commercial uses, etc. -
Tom Moorhead said various dining decks in the Town do have residential in the building
or adjacent to them.
Brian Doyon asked if a decision on the conditional use would af#ect the agreement with
Vail Resorts.
Tom Moorhead said the applicant was willing to work with Vail Resorts.
Doug Cahill said that there was an issue with a neighbor, having a private deck next to
this adjoining deck. He said he would like the deck to be pulled back and suggested a
solid screen.
Tom Bonnie said he would like to put up a screen between the decks.
Doug Cahill asked about the Tap Room bar activities_
Planning and Environmental Commission 3
Minutes
June 12, 2000
Approved June 26, 2000
Tom Bonnie said the Tap Room was moving into lunches everyday outside and hor's
deurves into the evening until it was too cold outside.
Doug Cahill said he could see the adjacent's concern with an overflow of a noisy bar, but
not with dining. He said the stairs could be moved to the door on the west end.
Tom Bonnie said they had tried to maximize the deck and still be within code and sc�id
ihey would love to move to the east closer to the residential unit on that side.
Doug Cahill said to move the stair to line up with the door to the west making the existing
deck come out to the property line.
Tom Bonnie said there were main gas lines coming through and mentioned that the rise
to run gets steeper and there would not be enough horizontal distance for the rise.
Tom Weber said it was an appropriate spot for a deck. He said he was concerned with
covering up the entrance and said, from an architectural standpoint, that he would rather
see that deck move over than have a screen there. He said if there could be an
agreement with the Town on Tract H, given that that tract was for recreational purposes,
there would be an argument that this was the best place for the deck. He then suggested
that the deck be pulled in a couple of feet from the neighboring deck.
Brian Doyon said this was an appropriate use. He would like the pine trees to the east
cut down for more sun.
Chas Bernhardt said it was appropriate for the zone district. He said the adjacents were
stuck with the use and he liked the idea of moving the deck away, but since it would cut
the size of the deck down, he liked the idea of moving the staircase, which would give
more usable space on the deck. He suggested set hours of 7a.m. to 7p.m., so there
would not be late-night drinking hours.
Tom Bonnie asked if it would be possible to extend the hours until 9:30 p.m.
Chas Bernhardt said the applicant would need something to appease the neighbors and
would like to see the deck moved with the stairway investigated.
Tom Bonnie said he would like to figure out how to be good neighbors:
Galen Aasland said this met the intent of the Town, but he recognized the conflict
between the adjacent neighbor. He said he would like to see a reasonable buffer and as
part of the condition of approval, there should be a reasonable separation. He stated
that residential properties in the CC1 should recognize that a conditional use deck might
go in.
Brian Doyon made a motion for approval, in accordance with the staff inemo.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Tom Weber said he would like to set a minimum distance between decks.
Discussion ensued between Brian Doyon and Tom Weber.
Galen Aasland said we needed to set some kind of reasonable separation and the F'EC
was entitled to ask for a reasonable buffer.
Planning and Environmental.Commission 4
Minutes
June 12, 2000
Approved June 26, 2000
Tom Bonnie asked if there were any guidelines for this separation, rather than being
arbitrary.
Galen Aasland said this was a conditional use permit, with conflicting interests.
Tom Moorhead said Galen correctly defined it.
Allison Ochs said the PEC could table this and propose a separation distance, or the
PEC could set a separation distance.
Brian Doyon said the DRB should take care of this and that the applicant should provide
this to the DRB.
Tom Weber said that one of the criteria for the PEC to address was light and air.
Chas Bernhardt said the width of the staircase might be an adequate buffer.
Doug Cahill agreed that if would be a substantial buffer.
Rick Mueller said tabling this would not be advantageous to the applicant, as they
wanted to catch some of the summer traffic.
Tom Weber said it was the responsibility of the applicant to come up with a buffer. He
said he would be more comfortable with tabling this, to let the applicant come up with a
separation suggestion.
George Ruther suggested tabling this and have the applicant propose some sound and
visual design alternatives. He said the applicant could then go to the DRB meeting for a
conceptual review and then come back to the PEC.
Galen Aasland suggested tabling this and coming back in two weeks.
Tom Bonnie explained the site with the gas lines, power lines, etc. He said he didn't
want a$30,000 deck to become a $100,OOOdeck.
Chas Bernhardt said tabling would only set the process back one week.
Galen Aasland said the use was appropriate, but the buffer was important.
_ George Ruther summarized the PEC's comments. He said the PEC was agreeable to
the use, but the PEC needed some alternatives to the buffering.
Tom Weber said there were other ways to do this with a screen, rather than pulling the
deck back.
Brian Doyon said he supported this the way it was.
Doug Cahill said he supported it with conditions of numbers and operating hours.
Tom Moorhead said it was within the PEC's authority to require operation times, when
considering adjacent properties and said this was not unusual for operational-type
issues.
Galen Aasland asked for this to be tabled, so staff could research other properties to
Planning and Environmental Commission 5
Minutes
June 12, 2000
Approved June 2�3, 2000
treat everyone fairiy.
Doug Cahill made a motion to iable this to the June 26, 2000 meeting.
Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-1, with Brian Doyon opposed.
5. A request for a building height variance from Section 12-6D-7 Vail Town Code,
located at 1755 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 6, Vail Village West 2�d Filing.
Applicant: Daniel and Karen B. Forey
Planner: Allison Ochs
WIT9iDRAWIV
6. A request for a conditional use permit, to add a Type II Employee Housing lJnit to
an existing primary unit, located at 375 Forest Road/Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village 3ra
Filing.
Applicant: Greg Vickers, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Planner: Allison Ochs
TABLED UN�'!L JUNE 26, 2000
7. A worksession to discuss a proposed zoning code amendment to Section 1'�-7B-
18 (Location of Business Activity), which would allow for mobile information
dissemination within the CCI Zone District on public property.
Applicant: VVTCB
Planner: Ailison Ochs
WITHDRAWN
8. SELECTIOFV OF PEC REPRESEiVTATIVE AT DRB FOR 2000-
Doug Cahill - Jan-Apr. 5, '00
Chas Bernhardt - Apr 19, `00
Galen Aasland - May 3, `00
Brian Doyon - May 17, '00
- Jun 7, '00
Tom Weber - June 21, 00
Diane Golden - Jul-Sep '00
John Schofield - Oct-Dec `00
George Ruther suggested reducing the impact by scheduling PEC reps for two months at
a time and that he had tried to get Council to do away with this altogether.
Brian Doyon said it was not up to the PEC to make quorum.
Tom Weber said he was in favor of 1 month intervals.
9. Information Update
Planning and Environmental Commission 6
Minutes
June 12, 2000
Approved June 26, 2000
Russ Forrest mentioned the Wednesday night ComFac meeting at Red Sandstone at
5p.m. He mentioned the next step would be reviewing the 4 alternative concepts and on
the 18`h they would be asking Council to narrow down the alternatives. He then gave a
Donovan Park update and said the VRD would operate, but not pay for recreational
updates.
Galen Aasland said he felt that PEC worksessions should be in a public forum and
thought the pre-meeting should be held in the Council Chambers.
10. Approval of May 8, 2000 minutes.
Chas Bernhardt made a motion to approve the amended minutes.
Doug Cahill seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0 with Tom Weber abstaining.
Chas Bernhardt made a motion to adjourn.
Doug Cahill seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m.
Planning and Environmental Commission 7
Minutes
June 12, 2000
H. After reviewing the goals of the Town of Vail and after discussions with the Community
Development staff an application was made to increase the size of the deck at the Vista
Bahn Building located at 333 Bridge Street. The purpose was to increase the size of the
exterior deck to provide outside seating space to compliment and expand the Tap Room _
Restaurant service area. It was made clear that this was a desirable addition for the Town.
Applications far a Conditional Use Permit and design approval were properly submitted
and processed. We met with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the
Design Review Board on two occasions each. While the PEC approved and highly
supported the deck use, its direction to us was counter to that of the Design Review
Board.
Plans were amended several times in order to accommodate conflicting direction givf,n by
the two Boards. We have attempted to resolve the stated desires of Board members i:n an
open manner. It is our goal to be cooperative in meeting public goals as well as provgding
a practical design.
Application was originally made to construct a deck to extend southward from the
existing restaurant in the configuration as described on Exhibit A. Subsequent to and in
response to suggestions by various Design Review Board members,the plan was
modified as shown on Exhibit B. Principally, the deck area was reduced above the
stairwell to improve headroom and to increase natural light to the area below.
Additionally, a planter was proposed at the northwest corner of the deck to increase noise
protection for the neighbor to the west and was stepped-down to assure maintenance uf
their existing views.
One of the suggestions of the Design Review Board was to reduce the deck to a parallel
line with the building, north of the bottom of the stairwell. This made the addition
impractical from a cost and use point of view. However, a revised design was submitted
for review by the Planning and Environmental Commission as shown on Exhibit C. This
was the minimum area for a useful deck. The Planning and Environmental Commiss:ion
approved the "use of the deck,but restricted it's westward extent to a specific point on �
the building in order to lessen potential impacts to adjacent properties. The Board fwrther
stated that greater extension eastward to make the addition practical was preferred. i
�
Upon revising the plan and again meeting with the Design Review Board,the plan was �
formally not approved. The plan as revised and review by the Design Review Board:is
included as Exhibit D. ;
i
�
�
i e `�'A
a� �'I � ,�
� ��:�. . � <''�,y_
TON�I OF UAIL -��, . `f�-�;P
Department of Communih�Development ����''�
75 South Frontage Road �
i�ail, Colorado 81657
970-479-?138
F�1X 970-479-2452
www ci.vail.co.us
June 22. 2000
Tecrill Knight
Knight Planning Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 974
Eagle, CO 81631
RE: Addition of the Vista Bahn Builcling deck for outdoor dining at the Taq Room ,
Gear Terrill,
The Design Review Board conc�ptually reviewed the deck addition at the Vista Bahn Buiiding at their
June 21, 2000 mesting. The faflowing were their comments and concerns:
1. The deck will create a�ark and uninviting space for the �edestrian ffaw that was intended with
the ariginal building design.
2. The board generaily felt ihat the angles of the decl<were out of character.with the existirg
building, Instead, the bo�rd felt that the�would oe more supportive of expanding the existing
decks and opening up the restaurant more to the outside.
3. The board felt that the deck°ruould create a dark, we± entranc� to the slci iockers. The also felt
that the �ead height created would not be conducive to people carrying skis.
�. The board felt that using up alf of the availabie saace was not an elegant solution. The proposed
dec� introduced a vocabulary unfamiliar to the existing building.
5. The board also expressed concarns about the proximity of ihe deck to the adjacent residential
use.
The Planning and Environmentai Commission hearing on the conditional use permit for the outdoor dining
deck has been tabled to the Ju(y 10, 2000, meeTing to allow you adequate time to integrate the Design
Review Board's comments into the proposal. Please submii new plans to me no later than July 3`d. Once
plans are submitted, I will schedule the deck for final design approval. Should you have additional
questions,.please do not hesitate to contact me at 479-2369.
Sincerely,
����� .
Allison Ochs
Planner II
Town of Vail
CC: Planning and Environmenta4 Commission
���RECYCLED P.4PER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 10, 2000
SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the establishment of outdoor
patio dining and seating, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road (Vista Bahn
Building)/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1St Filing.
Applicant: Remonov and Company
Planner: Allison Ochs
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The Vistsa Bahn Building is proposing an outdoor dining deck to be located at 333
Hanson Ranch Rd. / Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 St. The establishment of outdoor patio
dining is a conditional use in the CCI Zone District. The deck addition will allow for
outdoor seating for the Tap Room Restaurant. The deck addition will be reviewed by the
Design Review Board for compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations.
11. STAFF RECOfVIMEiVDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow for the
establishment of an outdoor patio dining deck, based on the following findings and the
criteria outlined in this memo:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district
in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code. -
�,
TOWN OF UAIL �°i
1
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional
use permit, staff recommends the following condition:
1. That the deck is shortened in compliance with the Design Review Board's
conceptual review of June 21, 2000 (see plan).
91�. ROLES OF 1'HE REV9E1NIii�G �OARDS
Planninp and Environmental Commission: The Planning and Environmental
Commission is responsible for evaluating this condifional use permit application for:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities,
utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public
facilities needs. �
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian
safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and
removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located,
including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed
use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental
impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title.
7. Conformance with development standards of zone district
Desiqn Review Board: The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating the
Design Review application for:
1. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings
2. Fitting buildings into landscape
3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography
4. Removal/Presenration of trees and native vegetation
5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site
6. Acceptability of building materials and colors
7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms
8. Provision of landscape and drainage
9. Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures
10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances
11. Location and design of satellite dishes
12. Provision of outdoor lighting
13. The design of parks
IV. CRITERIA Ai�D IFI�DI�GS FOR A COi�DITION.4L USE PERnAIT
Upon review of Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulations, the Community Development
Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit request to allow for the
establishment of the outdoor dining deck at the Vista Bahn Building based on the
following factors:
2
A. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objec�rives of
the Town.
Staff believes the applicant's proposal is in concert with the Town's
development objectives and will have minimal impacts on existing or
potential uses in the surrounding area.
The following development objectives of the Town are listed in the Vail
Village Master Plan and staff believes are relevant to this proposal:
2.1 Recognize the variety of land uses found throughout the Village
and allow for development that.is compatible with.these
established land use patterns.
3.3 Encourage a wide variety of activities, events, and street life along
pedestrian ways and plazas
� 3.3.2 Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and
shall be encouraged in commercial infill or redevelopment
projects.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreatior�
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that the proposal will have minimal, if any, negative impacts
on the above-described criteria.
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion,
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the
street and par6cing areas.
Staff believes there will be minimal, if any, negative impacts on the
above-described criteria
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
Staff believes that the proposal has many positive aspects and that the
character of the area will be enhanced as a result of the proposed
improvements. Los Amigos has an outdoor dining deck similar to the
proposed Tap Room deck. As this site is adjacent to the ski yard, staff
believes this will be an amenity to the public. However, staff recognizes
that there are residential uses adjacent to the proposed outdoor dining
deck. All Town of Vail noise ordinances are applicable to this site. As a
conditional use permit, the Planning and Environmental Commission has
the ability to revisit the conditions imposed upon it, should any conflicts
arise between adjacent uses.
3
�. Fi�DIi�GS
The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followina findinas before
qrantinq a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes
of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is �ocated.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of.the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
4
�..�..._.�_"__" NMAY.VG.AftOlE86NR^Fi
_ __ -..-���'IX!6 GRZCf 4fiFOH
� �� ' --¢rxanct-v:cr.urinim.a
___
.. ... a
+'`I enldeo�q R�at ;� � ;
ennarn� .�._ �j�f mnnrn a e ,.
----i.oc,m•-r�° - --. ._--�-- . . . :.., . .
�:=
—"'_..,V..._"__.._T�_R= ' �'
� r�f_�6-..E.IC9rL9`L1<��L1€�Gf_��Nq_�,..
\
dC
C
. �
� r�.�::; ---- 1-, __��
t=�iar.F,^�tr�E t'�c.�,arL �f ' �'�� � f L --�
--- �- -01 me w vcua_e't a rorca caasec¢rt �,�v.s+�'°`�'q�( 1 �
—_____ /F*'°"eams.rtrr'�ruoe� . .eR-m an^",-. }'�"'"r���;�G 0 �,�l;f .
f ��
1•"!^l1A•!9(AIP � ( I
. .. MLiGGC��a^0.� .._. J�— a���'1���I 'I �,1' ,' ��A� �- � J `_�.I �"} -1
BSOR 6"fl"C YIY]'O •�• .,��_� ,r .. __'1�_ . 11 _ � Y„�.� t`� _ ����
. 2 � .,rt•�'ee>' _— . . ' � �4 ... —1 .
r�
._ ���_ � ., �
r I _� I �. �{� 4�� �� i -� �` �' ( _,L_ � �-' "� ,� �� 1 "1�1
;� � —
_ _ �
� � -�N��I� ' I 1,< I L _ _ ,..�,
�, -l_.__ ----� -. ;.�r_ -'. � , � � � ..
S � :�_ }__-=�� - �
. . ):.���. f 111t�'�=�, : r--�� ���_._=� i __'.r'�1
• .__.I __._._ � � �}�i 1 t ,_ ' �. _.� '�\
, - ��. _.._ .�_.. _
,� ,: ; L_� �. -- _ �� __ --_=��� - _
_ . -�
�,, �___.� _�.. _�.. " .__— �;�=- -__ - 1�_ ,n
_,., _ .�. _:
� �
! ___-- _—� �, `,
;., _'___._�_.._.,� ..._ �_ -- , '� � «-... _ _ . C ,: ,
`.; � �� � i 1 ' �
� ?��� � I � , � '11 ,,. '1 i
� � `�I
v �I�
� . __ 11
�h remri ' � � I -�� ''� 1� �� r �`1 �g
� I �� . � .... �`� �' _�,����. i 1 I� �.�..__ �!' !
�'� •r� 1-- ` 1 F�4`. r ��
,�� 1 ���i � �
� % � � �`i��'4d9�+f'�°' �i� �
(�} , I a , ii 1
, �l
:,�,�.�-. �
�
'fR�f'.7 �ti�mNa � . . -_"_. _
_
- F �.v^rv^ai� / .
i 9
r"n. �
..._. „ � i ,t_, �i �
�,,...,.---. _......._,,,,���I n��.'4 _ _ __ ,-. .' ` �` �,,' ' 1�1'I
�
.. � � _,
,,.� 'n� �J_ _: �' �� � 11 �1�r � � 1-� �
e `
f . °
�, ti....� �, '9.L., ' ._ � ' �� � 11 �t• ,)�
.__ � :�
f . , " �.. ,o�zei __:_
� < <
� '�; � � I�- ��,:� � . . - __�::�=
4I �--" 1 i - i
� � � �
� �,a ��� ,. � �- I � � -
f' ,� {,��, ;��I � � �I _�J.__. `. _ -- -.
� , � � _�.� �j,
� � ' -- - �....:, �
�o .� ; "�P�� 1 �,.-^ - - ',1\` �.�'- - i %' �
� ( !? �'��R-�•J�- . - -- �-`�. I� _ _��� � � � � _,�».�_. e-+aza.:+..... .....
�e ...,-,. � �i 'I I �-
� `._. � ,. . _. . ��\`,
��'* � . � �,�+� ` •�' �p . �--_r—=_-, 1 `c_-��-r-:i.r.-�-_..i.=;.-__-_.L_i J -
A.. ��: — —. -— .-_—,:: _ - — L——
'' ��?�'1. L�j 7 _),_� .,�.v �..�.r—�-..- -.c*� � ,� �, ,�
� r�r I' J __J �, �p � �,,.
� i 1�------
,cai.ri��v.o,i� �� ` ' 1 ------- �j
� '�-''' a � �----...---_---------- i;°Ii>_I'��;'L�S: -- ��
�� �
� ,.------------------eecr: —
_._ - sririr�p ccmcr�rG r
__ --___— -
��"'""-"""'s'"�? 't0 hIATt:N�:f1811MG
r ""�_'�"„'-R'.nc,`°-'_�_� R,41L, ,._---. _- _.__
I Ii
E c�.r-,ar? : �
� ro rtnra��ac�rrw.; 1-----------------1
�ean�;N: �__
.
� I 'tfcf..__..... ._. �o�\niEVl cz.1.n wr_rn rimr�,��..�...��.�... r.:
• APPROVED 7/24/00
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
July 10; 2000
Minutes
MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Galen Aasland John Schofield George Ruther
Chas Bernhardt Tom Weber Brent Wilson
Diane Golden Doug Cahill Allison Ochs
Brian Doyon Judy Rodriguez
Public Hearinq 2:00 p.m.
� Galen Aasland called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a sign variance, from Section 11-4B-19 (B)(4), to allow for a third business
identification sign, located at 458 Vail Valley Drive (Larkspur Restaurant)/Tract F, Vail
Village 5th Filing.
Applicant: Larkspur Restaurant & Bar
Planner: Brent Wilson
Brian Doyon made a motion to table this item until the next meeting.
Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
2. A request for a major CC1 exterior alteration and a variance from Section 12-7B-12
(height), to allow for a dormer addition, located at 183 Gore Creek Drive (Sitzmark
Lodge)/Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1 S` Filing.
Applicant: Sitzmark Condominium Association
Planner: Brent Wilson
Brent Wilson gave an overview of the staff inemo.
Galen Aasland said that Slifers, Pepi's, Lodge at Vail, Vista Bahn Building and the Bridge Street
Lodge had requested height variances in the past. He said he wanted to know their outcomes,
in order to be fair to the applicant.
George Ruther explained the height variances that had been requested and granted in the past.
Galen Aasland asked if there was any applicant comment.
Bob Fritch said his proposal was consistent with the master plan and said that the dormer would
break up the roofline making it more interesting. He said that they were consistent with the
building next door with relation to height and that no view would be blocked.
Galen Aasland asked if there was any public comment.
Galen Aasland stated that the PEC would now take a minute to review the Slifer and Gasthof
Gramshammer prior variance requests.
1
Planning and Environmental Commission
vlinutes
APPROVED 7/24/00 '
Brian Doyon asked if the applicant had any GRFA left.
Brent Wilson said they had 1100 sq. ft. of GRFA left.
Brian Doyon stated ihat the existing building was the hardship. He said if the applicant wanted
to use up the allowable GRFA, he would have to go up, since he was surrounded by buildings. I
can see granting this using the existing building as the hardship.
Bob Fritch said there were 35 lodge rooms and 1 residential unit.
Brian Doyon explained since they couldn't go out the sides, he could see giving a height
variance.
Galen Aasland clarified the different uses in the building. He said the hotel units were seen
differently than the condo units.
Chas Bernhardt said the Sitzmark was built prior to the current zoning, and so it was not a grant
of special privilege.
Diane Golden agreed with Chas.
Galen Aasland said the Slifers were approved in 1989 and denied in 1998 because they were
asking for density. He said it appeared that the Slifers were given an approval in '89 because
they weren't asking for density. He said the building was built before zoning and the height
would not be affecting anyone. He said however, that if this was in the front row like Cyrano's,
he wouldn't vote for it.
Brent Wilson suggested making two separate motions with this request.
Brian Doyon said he would like the DRB or staff to make sure it did not exceed 8'.
Bob Fritch said the gable was up to 9' from the slab and less than a foot and a half on the sides.
Galen Aasland said they were comfortable with 52 1h `.
Brian Doyon made a motion to approve the major CC1 Alteration, subject to the finding on page
2.
Diane Golden seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
Brian Doyon made a motion to approve the variance with required findings on page 7 & 8.
Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
3. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the establishment of outdoor patio
dining and seating, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road (Vista Bahn Building)/Lot C,
Block 2, Vail Village 1 S` Filing.
Applicant: Remonov and Company
Planner: Allison Ochs
Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. ,
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant had anything to add.
2 ��
Planning and Environmental Commission �
Nlinutes
• APPROVED 7/24/00
Terrill Knight explained his rendering�to the PEC and said he still had to go back to the DRB and
address the access below.
Galen Aasland asked if there was any public comment. He said, for the record, that Tom
Moorhead said residents in the CC1 Zone District could expect a restaurant use. He said the
PEC would weigh the impacts of this proposal to protect the adjacent's property. He mentioned
that the neighbor was providing some of the 4' separation from the neighbor's deck.
Diane Golden said a server station in that location would be worse than a table there.
Galen Aasland asked if the planter was 1' wide.
Allison Ochs said it would come out 9 sq. ft. from the wall and there would be 707 sq. ft. of deck
area.
Diane Golden stated that they were close to the neighbor, but mentioned that nobody had heard
from the neighbor either way and also outdoor dining decks were encouraged.
Brian Doyon said he was in favor of this. He said he disagreed with the DRB and still thinks it
should go out from the eastern side and should pull back and said he encouraged an irregular
deck.
Chas Bernhardt agreed with Brian, specifically with regards to pulling away from the other deck
some more. He said if the deck started just east of the copper roof, then it would have adequate
separation from the unit next door and wouldn't infringe on the light and air below. He said he
also liked an irregular deck.
Terrill Knight said the DRB was thinking smaller.
Diane Golden said she read a letter of opposition from the Bridge Street Lodge.
Allison Ochs said staff would recommend approval if the deck was made smaller.
Brian Doyon said if the two squares were taken off that run perpendicular to the building than it
would provide the buffer that was needed.
Allison Ochs said the PEC needed to focus on the use and impacts and let the DRB review the
architectural details.
Galen Aasland said tables would look into the adjacent property owner's living room and so what
the PEC was asking for was a reasonable buffer. He said if more space was added to the east
he would be fine with that space, but a 1' landscape buffer was not sufficient. He said his choice
would be to have the juncture be stucco:
George Ruther clarified that the point east of the door was the approximate location where the
deck would terminate and summarized that the PEC wanted nothing further west of the stucco
pillar.
Brian Doyon made a motion for approval, in accordance with the staff inemo, with the condition
that the deck be shortened to the west end of the stucco pilaster.
Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
3
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
APPROVED 7/24/00 '
4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6F-6, to ailow for a garage addition, located at
4718 Meadow Drive/Tract B, Bighorn Townhomes Subdivision.
Applicant: Bill Bernardo, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Planner: Allison Ochs
TABLED UPVTIL JULY 24, 2000
Chas Bernhardt made a motion to table the above item.
Diane Golden seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
5. Information Update
Russ Forrest gave an update on the Community Facilities, in terms of the three developed uses
on the site and encouraged the PEC to participate.
Russ gave an update on an administrative change to DRB applications. He said effective May
1 st, both signatures wouid be required on an application for Parcel C lots. He said he would like
to discuss with the PEC having the same requirement for parcels just A and B lots.
Tom Moorhead said property rights would be a concern with A and B parcels, as far as GHFA
and it was not within our rights to determine property rights and available GRFA. ,
Brian Doyon said a lot of work won't get done since a lot of neighbors don't like each other. .He
said the PEC was not here to pass judgement and until they resolve their problems, he didn't
want to see them.
Tom Moorhead said since it was a tremendous time allocation on our resources, he would like to
come up with a procedure to bring the parties together.
Brent Wilson said, for the record, that he had received 144 emails from the Ferry/Repetti
situation.
Brian Doyon suggested getting the signature of the neighbor before coming in, as it was wasting
staff and the PEC's time.
Chas Bernhardt agreed that it had to be settled before coming in. - �
Galen Aasland summarized that it was very appropriate on an ABC property, however AB
properties may have individual property rights, so it may be overstepping the Town's right to do
this. However if it was to be adopted, it should be a fair due process with written notice.
6. SELECTION OF PEC REPRESENTATIVE AT DRB FOR 2000-
Doug Cahill - Jan-Apr. 5, '00
Chas Bernhardt - Apr 19, `00
Galen Aasland - May 3, `00
Brian Doyon - May 17, '00
No Rep - Jun 7, `00
Tom Weber - Jun 21, '00
John Schofield - Jul 5, '00
- Jul 19, `00
4
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
(
• APPROVED 7/24/00
- Aug 2, '00
- Aug 16, '00
- Sep 6, '00
- Sep 20, `00
John Schofieid - Oct-Dec '00
Chas Bernhardt volunteered to be the PEC rep for DRB for July 1 g`n
7. Approval of June 26, 2000 minutes.
Brian Doyon made a motion to approve the amended minutes.
Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
Diane Golden made a motion to adjourn.
Brian Doyon seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-0.
The meeting adjourned at 3:35 p.m.
5
Planning and Environmental Commission
ivlinutes
Vaey Pa�king Sfudy
�'O�Ei�'TIA�. PAFiKIR�G 6YSTEfil�l �'iIODOF6CATl�fl1S
��►�ES FOF3 DE�/ELOPIFi�� �a i�fl�D��IED COMPREHEIVSIVE PAFiK1iVC, PROGFde�ti/i FpF� \/e�IL
. . .... ... ..: . ,... _ _
�__. ._._, . :.:....:.� _ - - -
__„ _ ,,,- _.,.
_ :;,_.:-
� - .�ti,
- �.�-:�:c:;::;=;�:�����- "�
4:-��
- _ ' ' "':'Iz.r. ' _
��- :j,: _
:UC
'fi -
_Y�
"' ' ' •'X %:�..
" ��t '
�i,� ' '
:;�.. .�C�:� -
_•1•� _ '.y"y� _
.. ..,.� .M..... .::�..�-,r:'. s�... .._ .. . . .,� .. .y .
'+�:.w':-�.:..�.i�. v..�-�.'n.i.:�.i ��r...�>.-:v i �. � .�..�.�.�.. �.._. ..
:til: - .�, ,�,` �I.lris`w:n.�.:l�` ��r�_{./Ww.+.:•.�►i.M�+il�+wi•:.w
- f.v ' - ��1j'_t� .a.r:
�;.�a,�...ail;-�P'd9 �r' no+4�'`:,n,....�r;.';;:,...�.::'�:. ~S.vt� tg --
. y . ,.. ,
.� . _:.:...;.,.
. .� ;�
�:�. . .:. r;�!..._. �"�v'.A'�i.,e'�t4. �t_...P. ,-,:�,,;... _��s��,��;�,.,.
,_�.:._;..
- -��.-.-..._. ., . . . ..._M� ... r..::.._,.. . .. ...�
1. Provide a ..."Percep2ion of Develop a Revised Parking fee schedule vvhich
value for skiers." incorpora4es a �10 maximum daily charge.
2. "Encourage shopping and dining IVlaintain 90 minute free pa�king and free
from down valley." evening parking.
3. AdopY..."Yield management Deve)op a peak day parking free schedule
i.e., supply and d�mand, which incorpora2es a S12 to S15 maximum
optimiae use of parking daily charge and increments at $2/hour.
structure."
Consider summertime parking fees (e.g., Y2
fixed price, pay on enYry).
4. Provide...°Product variery for Provid� 1) premier valet parking; 2) covered
mul�iple custom�r needs_" structural parking; 3) reduced rat� frontage
road parking; 4) free remote parking at Ford
Park and along frontage road; and 5) provide
bus service accordingly.
5. � Provide..."�mployee opYions/ fVlaintain debiY card discount: focus upon
considerations." emqloyee useP group; price according 4o value
� � of parking and cost of transi� service. nllatch
6. "NAake transportaYion/parfcing transit service to employee schedules.
woPk for employees."
7. "What can we give away? Recognize competing objectives (e.�_, value
WhaY can w�s afford Yo give pricing based upon dem�nd ver�u� need for low
avNay?" cost parking for certain useP groups).
8. f�lain�ain..."Consisteney - no "Smooth" jumps in parking fee schedule.
surp�is�s."
Balance 1) peak demand managemenY; 2)
revenue generation; and 3) parking facility
utilization.
�lieninate pay in li�u program.
�stablish parking program for en4ire season
(year) with no changes mid-term.
� FELSDURG
�� �1 O L T �k
ULLEVIG
�
, . Contribution Request Spreadsheet
,�._ COUNCIL IVIEIVIBEit IVAIVI]E
..�,_ �._.....��...._.�.._....�,....._,....M..�,.�.�,.�,�._�_,_..._.,..�._.w,..�..�_..._...�.....�.._..�.��.....�...._.......w..,.,.�..,,.,.�........_.._..._..�.�...��.�..�.._.�.......�..�......�..„
�....� .�_..�.._,�_�.�,�.0..�.._._....,�.,.,�
2000 � ; 2,OOl 2,OOl 2001 I19anagers Council N➢embers �
° ��'�W�T�T�.,�:�JI�iIAIPd�R����T`�� � � ��=R��� F � ` (n-Kind 2000 2000 = ' Cash In-➢Cind In-➢Cind Recommendation d2ecommendation =
,r,.,a:.w�Y>-F.. ..s,..�,. ,..�.... , :, . .. t,a�,..>r:> �».;.»..w.��K<r.:�'..:; �
GEN�I2AIL�IJNID Contributions: �escription Request Contribution � ' Request Request Description Cash In-➢Cind Cash In-ICind
-,�.�...w:_...w..,_:,_...,._.�..�.....�.�..................._.,...M.,.�......�....�......_..._....:...m....__..:.,.._.....m. �...,...._..::::._._�._...M....:_..:,..m,.......:..:..�..........,......:...M,.....:::::::.:.�.....w:.......:::.,.._..:...._..�.,::.:..wM.._._..�.�....�.:,,�.....�:.�.:.�.:......::::::..:.u.......,,.._....�,.,:._.....:::::::,:::,....,._...::...:._..�._..........ww.µ�,µ_......M..._...�,,..,:._...._......::
. �COIVOIi'd�C: � � �
1 Bravo!Colorado/John Giovando ' 30,000 25,000 ; 30,000 25,000
I Bravo!Colorado/John Giovando ; Parking @ Ford Park ` Granted
2 The Chamber of Commerce/Jen Brown ' 6,000 4,000 i � 25,000 4,000 ; `•
2 The Chamber of Commerce/Jen Brown �1 Day of Ice Granted ; 1 Day of Ice Granted
3 Eagle Co Down Payment Assistance Committee-Christie Banowetz; j 15,000 0 ; �
4 VV Merchants-Block Parties/Kaye Ferry 20,000 15,000 � 20,000 10,000 ;
5 LH/VV Merchants Assoc-The Guide/Kaye Ferry 15,000 10,000 � 15,000 7,500 � ;
6 Vail Community Chamber-Josef Staufer ;(Note 1) ; 70,000 5,000
7 Vail Jazz Foundation/Howard Stone 15,000 7,000 ' ' 10,000 10,000
8 Vail Valley Foundation/Rick Beveridge or Ceil Folz: t � ;
8 American Ski Classic 30,000 17,000 j 30,000 20,000
8 World Mountain Bike Championships 50,000 50,000 = 50,000 20,000 Pub Wks&Police 50,000 20,000 ;
8 American Cycle Classic 20,000 0 ; 0 j
8 Winter Concert Series 10,000 0 ; 20,000 6,000 Pub Wks&Police 10,000 6,000 ; i
8 Parking :460 Parking Debits 2,300 2,300 ; 2,300 460 Parking Debits 2,300 -
8 Vail International Dance Festival 12,500 11,500 j 12,500 12,500
8 Gerald R. Ford Ampitheater(Hot Summer Nights) 5,000 5,000 i 10,000 ]0,000
Subtotal-VVF 129,800 85,800 j 122,500 28,300 ]02,500 28,300 ;
,
TO'd'AL IECON01�9➢C
€
: .... 2��,$t}#1 ;: ..;14�+,$(�Q,� �::�, 3(#7,St�U �
. _. ,. �8;3U0.:< ::..]64;0{)t3 :�$,3fltl. '� �.. ���,. ,�
Cont01 1 09/08/2000
a
. • Contribution Request Spreadshcet
COUiVCIL MENIBER iVAME
P� #....,.....,....��...............................�..,.......................,...............�.................. ...........,.w............,........... ...w.......... ....�...�.,.,
m...�... �.�...........................................,.....�...�,........�......................,................
2UDU � 2,U�1 2�Ul 20�1 .M...,,._�.....,...._...._�..__._........_...._�..........._�..,„_�v......_.................._._.......�....
:.
�
�� �
+ ; anagers C'ouncilIWembers
' :��'o�Q���������������' � � F �� ,�,a � Hn-DCind 2000 2000 Cash In-Kind In-Kind `' Recommen ation Rec mmen ation
..,.. 3.,�,.M. � ; d r o d '
CENERAL FU1VdD Contributions. Description Request Contribution ; Request Request Description ? Cash ln-1{md � Cash In-ICind >
_..,,..,._.,.�._h._...._,._...�... .__ _ ._ __ _ _.. ,.�..._..u._�_,_�.,��..�.:.�_..�..,.... ;...
_ .... _�
EIDU�ATIOIVAd.: ' ' ° - ;;
9 The Buddies of EagleCounry/Rhonda Atencio 10,000 p £
10 Environmental Educator-Eileen Connors p p _ € � �
11 Gore Range Natural Science School/Kim Langmaid = 10,000 0 � ; 3,000 p
12 Leaming Tree/Moe Mulrooney 650 0 � 4,500 � p
13 Meet the Wildemess/Thomas McCalden 5,000 0 ; 5,000 � p
14 Snowboard Outreach Sociery-Arn Menconi = 1,250 } 0
15 SOS Wildlife Rehabilitation-Rich Ranieri � f �
16 Vail-Eagle Valley Rotary Club-Susan Pollack 525 Parking Pass 525 �
17 T'he Vail Symposium/Ebby Pinson 2,000 0 = ; 500 500
24 Vail Valley Comm.TV/Ch5 10,000 p
TO'd'A�.�II9BlCATllOIVAg., ' x. �,.� �;'7,65t1 ..;� ..,.__' .�.; . <?!. �. 3�32�� �.,': . ....S�S,: '. �<:>.. . �QQ S2� ,;' < '
; .. ... .<: � .:� �.,.
I-IEALTH ANID IIUIVIAIV SEdtVICES:
.
18 The Heuga Cenier/Brian Hutchinson 1,500 0 ; 2,500 p
19 Vail Mountain Rescue Group/Bob Armour 2,000 2,000 ; 2,000 1,000
TOTAL I��A]LT➢-I A1VID II-➢�JMfAIV SERV9C�S - � � 3 5� ,�� .k.�, . 2,0� ; z;;; �?'� ,$;5(�„ `�„ ��, :, p.:, �,{}[� � ; � , ; `' �u � � �g ,
,. ...:�... � _� >� �
Cont01 2
09/08/2000
a
, _ Contribution dtequest Spreadsheet
, o COIJIVCYL I�9EMBEYt NA1V➢�
...........................«...................................,...�.�...,...�µ.....n.......................m.....,....«....:...��.. .M....«.........,............�.�«........�.....,....�...............,..............�.................................£................�.......................v..�..,........�..� �.....w.«............,..........................,.....................................,............,..;_
2000 : 2,OOl 2,001 2001 ; Nlanagers CouncillViembers ;
' �'�'OWl►I����YYE�tF�ITBI�d�;1��ii��',�.,;,;m�µ , ;����,��„ In-➢{ind 2000 2000 � Cash In-➢Cind In-Kind Itecommendation 62ecommendation :
...,. ._ � ,,..__ � € s
GENEg2A1L�'U1VIID Contributions: Description ]Request Contribution ` � Request Request Description ; Cash In-Kmd ; Cash In-Kind �
,..,,,.,,.,_.........,._M_,� .__�.w..._._.,.�._.._....._,�.......�.,.�.....,......w.. ............._.....u.� ,.�....m..�......_.,.,H,....�........_............w..._..�.��.....�..� ,. �.. ...... ..._,.,, ,w�,y.. �.
,::,....„ .., �,.... . .... ._ �.. .....,,�...�w.,w....,,�......... ,
R�CR�A'd'IO1V: ..w ;
20 The Resource Center of Eagle County-Bev Christiansan 15,000 5,000
21 Skating Club of Vail-Shawn Boris 8 Days of Ice Granted
22 Ski Club VaiVSusan Dooley <4 Days @ Dobson 0 4 Days ; 4 Days of Ice Granted
22 Ski Club Vail/Susan Dooley 525 Parking Pass 525 '
23 Snowshoe Shuffle-Sarah Ladd 3,500 �00 Debits 3,500
T�'d'A1,BtEC�A'I'HOIV O .',,', 0': `'� �I�,�fiA ; 4.'t?25. .::. , S,UOa . ..�'���..'' � .• . F..,;_, ;.�. ..;<:
,�. z� ,a
,
�
... ,.,,.,. : ,.
� _ , � . ,.:, ,, ,::
; . - :.< x . :•+.� :> p{7 ;_< , ,:< , .�,.
� :��' a f .�=. i �� ,�:: .y. >.q�. .,, .,'�.:. ..��::: ...:. . (�_ ..- .:: ............s.. .,., .:.: , < .,...:'.;.. ....'-:sc.�v
: ._-������.• ° ; . , : . .. �"
d....,..... , �
.� ������$��Q���n .:; ,. ,;� . ::.,: . � .:..
.., .... ..... . .......,...F���..,: .:-�.: '.�..� , i::;;s::: .. .�<3����..�:� „� P tt';-.: ....��.�•. �`:�: �, -.
� ........: .............. ....:...,. ,,. ..,..<. <.....,.:T£. �.. .:�.,., � a �,. J..1.���� ��i���.(s 1 �71i,ry�� �
�„s._.., ,. .ir�o ... .. .,,...e�9 ...<......,,s , :�.i:�:. , i��y. .. . . . �' x3
.,. .... . .., .:.
... ,,,.. . ,%: :::�:. ., .t.yf.. ... .::3„. ...,a ..?:
ARItANGE]r1�1V"H'S and AGp2E�1W�1V'0'S: < ; ; ;
24 Vail Vailey Comm.TV/Ch5(40%of franchise fee)/Terrie Perez ;(Note 3) 44,880 44,880 � 57,120 57,120
Vail Valley Exchange 6,300 6,300 < ]
Berry Creek Sth-operating expenses =(Note 2) 20,000 N/A
Vail Valley Athlete Commission 5,000 5,000 ; 5,000
25 Vail Valley Tourism&Convention Bureau/Frank Johnson:
25 Events&Information Staff �7 Blue Passes 3,675 3,675 ; 5,775 ]l Parking Passes Pending
Marketing 183,500
25 Information Booths 155,800 155,800 ; 208,300 Pending
25 Special Events 332,000 332,000 � 456,500 Pending
25 Vai150 £25 Parking Permits 10,625 10,625 ;? 13,125 25 Parking Passes 13,125
Lodging Quality Initiative 105,984
, , ,
Total VVTCB � 791,584 502,100 ; � 664,800 = 13,125 0 = 0 t
n: ,. ,,.< <.. . ,
, .
< ,; ° � _ ;: r .
;.. S B`.'�'. _ ..;, ,.... . . <.. �;
,. ,.
'�3_... C3T l�t�EM� ,: ;:. .,.G , , � , ;; >
, . . . .._. _�« �1'�'S and Ai. R� t4���.:�. ..�".. ��..8�7 ` 8 ..r..�.:: f «,.
��,� �...... . _� .. :�,;�..�� 7b4 ,:: a��a �f! <,. .. fi�i 2U .1� .: �; .. . ... ... _ : _ .::. .:.
� . . .._.,_. .._�. �..� z. .. � �.... ........ � ,.:, ..:� � .. ,, ,�<. � .....� �tf�. 'ta �15 Q
� u... . .........._,.... <E. . .............,......,..2. ......�.. _..,......�,.-. ..,. . 9 ..._ , ......, ,.........,.. .... ..�-:..� .,.:.:., .,.,.:.:}. .Y.,
...:,.;». . � �.. ' ..
x. .. :.; . . .
. , ,t...... ...::: ...........b .xr:..::£ .,....:h.;,. .....:.s,. :. :
:.,�.... .. :,-�. �..... >.... ..... , .. ..:.::�..T..... v .: .R�:,�:...,.F . ...., . . ...
... ..{.l .. .. ......... ... .. ...... . . ........., ,w.,D....�..... ... .
1.,�............ .... . . .. . ..... .. . , . ...._. 3. .�.,.... .. � :.s..,-..:. ,.. . . ,
. . :: . ..,.:.:.. ..: .
. :.... . :.. . :-; . ...-':.:,:: ':„,,.-...a V ... 3�::.. ..:.e„ � '. . . .:.. .::: .. . .f:::
S`............. ... . ... :.. . ... .. . �. . . .? 1 .. ..... - ''.':: •. :�!. :.
....... . ..... . . . . .. ,,..,:. . ....:........... .. . ...: . -::: .z...
....,,...17 . ,.. .. . ..n_.... . ..,......w, .u.i....: -':. •c...... . � . , .. '
��..����:,.�11LY���!`lifli� .. ,.. .. . � ; _- . . ; ,:;
. , ....-1104 7�4 7U7 K :.
_.. ..> . ;�.,: ...= 48U. >::, l 083 Y74. .S .. ;:: �. :.. �.�..
. . �._..�,. _...r. ._ ,... ��� .... �.. � .,. _ � .= i'T�U .. . .... 24�.?..45...._� _.:. . .0 �
>. ,, ... �. ,.. >,. .�.._. . .....� .... . :,.�._ ,.....,..�...a�. ,.... � ,. .�
�: ..�.,:..:s ._._..��,.�; . w...��...<�,..� _.;.� ,,,=�z..,._ .�M., :...z�. ..,�Al�;��k,a.z_;.:.:V,µ..._<..�:.:;«,�r,a=::.M:�sw . ..,;,: . � z. < ,..<az.__ r,.....
Cont01 3 09/08/2000
.�
. . Contribution Request Spreadsheet
� COUIYCIL IW]EN➢BEDi NANHE
,..,.....�.�,........M.._...._.........,M.m.....�.,_�,_,......�...�....�......_...�.�.�......_...m.�. _.....m..._.,..,.�_..___........
2000 2,001 2,001.������2001 .�..�� � �. � ���f��.������ �
N➢anagers Council IWembers
' ��8��;����I�-�'�.I�II��I���'�'�u, xw�r�,���'';� `;�' In-➢Cind 2000 2000 Cash In-Kind ln-Kind � Recommendation � 3tecommendation
� , _... ,. �.,. : x
GEIVEBtA]L F�J1VD Contributions. Description Request Contribut�on � ' ]Request Request IDescription ; Cash In-Kind ` Cash In-Kind ;
.�._....�,......__._.__.��,..........: , ,.._ _....._ _M:.._�........,.�..._.�.,._..._h.,.�.._. .. __ .. . . _...,w..�,w.,. ...�._.. __
.... . ��..„ _ ...�.,._ .._._w._...._....... ....,_., �..�;;
, _ �
Iteal�state Transfer Tax�und: _ ; >
26 Vail Alpine Garden Foundation/Ry Southard F20 Parking Passes 0 ; :
26 Vail Alpine Garden Foundation/Ry Southard 38,500 38,500 < 38,500 38,500 =
,
` ' .�..�.__.,.._�...... �_.M_w_...._..___.�,. __�H.w.�.,. _�._.._..�._�._���_...�._.,,. _.,____.....__w.._...._.._.:
IVOTES:
1. Funded out of Council Contingency in 2000,$20,000
2. No longer required entity disowned
3. Required based on franchise agreement 40%of Revenue
Cont01 q
09/08/2000
n
w
DESIGiV REVIEIIV BOARD AGEfVDA
VVednesday, Septernber 6, 2000
3:00 P.IVi.
MEETIiVG RESULTS �
PFdOJECT ORIEIVTATIOIV/ LUNCH -Communi4y Developmen4 Depar4men# 1'i:30 �pn
MEiVi�ERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce �
Hans Woldrich
Melissa Greenauer
Tom Weber (PEC)
SITE VISITS 1:30 prvi
1. Coldstream Condos— 1476 Westhaven Circle
2. Vestlandet Condos — 1746/1756 W. Gore Creek Drive
3. Axelrod residence— 1977 Circle Drive
4. Young residence— 1452 Lionsridge Loop
5. Sandstone 70— 903 Red Sandstone Road
6. Vail Mountain Adventure Center—254 Bridge Street
Driver: Ann
PU�LIC HEARIfVG -TOVVfV COUfVCIL CHAM�ERS 3:00 pm
1. Vestlandet Condos - Final review of changes to approved plans for remodel. Ann
1746/1756 W. Gore Creek Drive/Lots 1&2, Vail Village West Filing#1.
Applicant: Vestlandet Condominium Association, represented by Richard Stampp
, MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0
COfVSEfVT APPIROVED
2. Geneva 1 Project— Final review of proposed single-family residence. � Brent
4355 Bighorn Road/Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn 3`d Addition.
Applicant: Bill Bolden, represented by Robert Nikkel
COIVCEPTU�4L— IVO VOTE
3. Vail Mountain Adventure Center— Final review of proposed awning. Brent
254 Bridge Street/Lot L, Block 5C, Vail Village 1S� Filing.
Applicant: VMAC, represented by Teak Simonton
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITFi 4 COfVDITIOfVS:
�
�.
1 �
TO{4'N 0�YALL � �
:.
1. The awning shall have a shed roof form to match the existing awning roof. .
2. The top and bottom levels of the awning shail match the top and bottom members of the
wall railing pic�ets and the awning will conform to the surface of the wall where it is mounted
3. The awning may extend as far as legally possible but must remain cantilevered (no support
posts).
4. Any outstanding fire_code issues must be resolved.
4. Gerald R. Ford/Vilar Pavilion— Final review of a revised front entry feature. Brent
841 Vail Valley Drive/Unplatted, Vail Village 7'n
Applicant: Morter Aker Architects
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa GreenauerVOTE: 5-0
APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
5. Sandstone 70— Final review of proposed removal of 4 cottonwood trees. Biil
903 Red Sandstone Road/Lot 15, Tract C, Sandstone 70.
Applicant: Jim Cooper, Resident Manager
MOTION: Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 5-0
DENIED
6. Vail Junior Hockey Ice Rink— conceptual DRB review. Brent
1778 Vail Valley Drive / Lot 3, Sunburst Filing 3.
Applicant: Vail Junior Hockey Association, Vail Recreation District, Town of Vail
COIVCEPTUAL— NO VOTE
7. Coldstream Condos —final review of a proposed residential "250" addition. Brent
1476 Westhaven Circle, Unit 9 / Coldstream Condominiums, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Coldstream Condominium Association / Osoro Ltd.
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 4-0-1 (Pierce recused)
CONSENT APPROVED
8. Axelrod residence —final review of a revised landscape plan. Brent
1977 Circle Drive / Lot 25, Resubdivision of Buffehr Creek
Applicant: �Art & Judith Axelrod, represented by Peel/Langenwalter Architects
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0
TABLED
9. Young residence — Conceptual review of a proposed driveway alignment. Brent
1452 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 4, Ridge at Vail.
Applicant: Mike Young
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0
TABLED
10. Skaal Haus — Final review of proposed remodel. Bill
141 West Meadow Drive/Lot D2, Vail Village 2�d Filing.
Applicant: Skaal Haus Condominium Association, represented by Phillipe Courtois
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa Gr.eenauerVOTE: 5-0
TABLED INDEFINITELY AT REQUEST OF APPLICANT
2
:
a:
Staff Approvals
Huffard residence — Relocatian of window, window addition, interior conversion. Allison
2990 Booth Creek DrivelLof 3, Block 3, Vail Village 11'h Filing.
Applicant: Jay and Kirk Huffard
Chateau Tremonte— Repaint of Units B and C. Bill
1860 Lionsridge Loop/Loi 27, Block 2, Lionsridge 3�d Filing.
Applicant: Dan McNeil
Stern residence— Replace windows. Allison
1517 Vail Valley Drive Unit 1/Lot 12, Block 3, Vail Valley 3`d Filing.
Applicant: Ronald and Ann Stern
Vail Spa Condominiums — Replace sod and siding. Bill
710 W. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Bfock 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3.
Applicant: Vail Spa Condo Association
Arosa/Garmisch Employee Housing —Window change. Allison
2477, 2485, 2487, 2497 Garmisch/Lots 1-4, Block H, Vail das Schone 2"d Filing.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Creekside Building — Repaint. Allison
223 E. Gore Creek Drive/Creekside Building.
Applicant: Vail Management
Vail Golf Club — 15'h Tee Box retaining wall. Bill
Vail Golf Course/Unplatted parcel.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Vail Heights Condos — Deck addition and drainage pipe installation. Bill
2079 Chamonix Lane #7/Lot 15, Vail Heights Filing 1.
Applicant: Vail Heights Condo Association
Williamson residence —Window replacement. gi��
434 Gore Creek Drive/Lot B, Btock 3, Vail Village 5'h Filing.
Applicant: Cille Williamson
Gardiner residence— Replace bathroom window & vent. Bill
288 Bridge Street#R-1/Rucksack Building, Vail Village 15t Filing.
Applicant: Bill Gardiner
Kivland residence— New deck, cloor addition and window enlargement. Bill
1738 Golf Lane #61, Vail Golfcourse Townhomes/Sunburst Filing 3.
Applicant: Robert and Elizabeth Kivland
Klawiter residence— Deck addition. Bill
4768 Meadow Dnve/Kit 1, Blacic 7, Bighorn Subdivision 5th Addition.
Applicant: Wolfram Lkawiter
Johnson residence — Construction of sand volleyball court. Allison
5165 Main Gore Drive/Lot 19, Vail Meadows 1St
Applicant: Frank Johnson
3
�'�♦
�.
Illingworth residence — Change to secondary unit elevation and windaw trim color. Allison
5112 Grouse Lane/Lot 8, Vail Meadows 15} Filing.
Applicant: Don Illingworth
The Wren —Addition of two hot tubs. Bill.
� 500 S. Frontage Rd./Tract D, Vail Village 151 Filing.
Applicant: Clear Water Spa & Patio "
Town Manager's Residence — Exterior remodel. Ann
2507 Arosa Drive/Lot 5, Block D, Vail das Schone Filing #1.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Wren House — Re-roof, new gutters, skylights. Bill
5024 Main Gore Drive/Lot 7, Block 3, Vail Village 1S' Fifing.
Applicant: The Wren Home Owner Association
Dore residence — Change to approved plans. Ann
100 Vail Road/Lot 35, Block 7, Vail Village 15'.
Applicant: Bill Dore
Town of Vail —Weather station installed north of the Com-Dev Building. Bill
75 South Frontage Road/Unplatted, Lionshead 2"a
Applicant: Town of Vail
Hilliard/Chapman residence — Reroof and exterior painting. Bill
1801 Sunburst, Units A&B/Lot 2, Vail Village 3`a
Applicant: R. Glenn Hilliard and Lee S. Chapman
Shane / O'Connell residence — Deck modifications, window, siding, trim rep4acement. Bill
2945 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village 11'h Filing.
Applicant: John & Beverly Shane & Bonnie & Derek O'Connell
Oilily—Outdoor display. Judy
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Block 5C, Vail Village 1S` Filing.
Applicant: Ron Riley
Miller residence — Interior conversion. Brent
1415 Westhaven Drive/Lot 52 Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Gary Miller
The applications and information about the proposals are available far public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
4
PLAfVfVIIVG AfVD EIVVIRONiVIEiVTAL COf1�iViISSIOfV
PUBLIC MEETIfVG SCHEDULE
Monday, September 11, 2000
PROJECT OFdIEfVTATION/ - Community Development Dept. PUBLIC UVIELCOME 'i2:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits : 'i:00 pm
1. O'Brien residence —2992 A Bellflower Drive
2. Selby residence— 1467 Aspen Grove Lane
3. Hockey rink— 1778 Vail Valley Drive
Driver: George
��
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m.,the board may break for dinner from 6:00-6:30 p.m.
Public Hearinc� -Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A worksession for a major subdivision and variance from Section 12-66-5 (Minimum Lot
Frontage) of the Town Code, to allow fo�the subdivision of Lot 8 into Lots 8A & 8B,�located
at 1467 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 8, Block 2, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 4.
Applicant: Robert Selby, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Allison Ochs
2. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 of the Town Code, to allow for the addition of
a garage and GRFA in the side setback, located at 2992 A Bellflower Drive/Lot 10, Block 6,
Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: J.P. O'Brien
Planner: Ann Kjerulf
3. A request for a rezoning (from Outdoor Recreati.on to General Use), a minor subdivision and
a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of a seasonal ice hockey rink at the
Vail Golf Course, located at 1778 Vail Valley Drive / Lot 3, Sunburst Filing 3.
Applicant: Vail Junior Hockey Association, Vail Recreation District, Town of Vail
Planner: Brent Wilson
4. A request for a final review for a minor subdivision to allow for the reconfiguration and
replatting of two existing lots and the rezoning of Lot 16, Bighorn 2"d Addition, from
Agricultural � Open Space to Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential, and the rezoning
of Tract A to Natural Area Preservation District, located at 3886/3896 Lupine Drive/Lots 15 &
16, Bighom 2"d Addition.
Applicant: Wilson Family Trust, represented by Jay Tschirner, First Land Development,
� LLC
Planner: George Ruther
T�4BLED UfVTIL SEPTEMBER 23, 2000
.
�,
1 T0�'h'OF Y.4IL �`�
5. Information Update
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,Telephone for the
Hearing Impaired,for information.
Community Development Department
Published September 8, 2000 in the Vail Trail
2
������� ���������
�OPIC QUESTIO�S FOL�OlAlUP
2000
07/25/00 DOBSON ICE ARERIA PAfVI: Inc. 500 organizers have expressed negative Pam and Lorelei will be meeting with Kathy Fort Carty from
feedback re: the approval process for the use of Destination Services. Destination Services personnel are currently
Rod Slifer pobson Arena. preparing a written follow up summary.
08/08/00 NlOTORIZED SCOOTERS OiV Greg M: Are we at a point where we need to be more Prohibiting scooters will require a dismount zone. Bob will prepare a
BIKE PATHS AND IIV VILLAGE pro-active about educating users, enforcing guidelines, letter to the rental shops.
possibly revising our rules for use in pedestrian and bus
Kevin Foley lane areas? (See Ron Byrne letter)
Greg: Follow up with letter to rental shops.
Septe�nber 8,2000, Page 1
At the special Council meeting on Thursday, September 7th, the following
Councilmembers indicated preferences to serve on either the 501(c)3 or 501(c)4
committe in regard to the White River Institute's efforts for the Hub Site:
Rod 501(c)3
Chuck 501(c)3
Ludwig 501(c)3
Sybill 501(c)3
Greg EITHER
Kevin IVEITHER
Diana NEITHER
PLEASE VOTE FOR TWO FOR EACH OF THESE CONiMITTEES:
501(c)3
501(c)4
a �� ���� ��
` ''Q�� �
ae ` ,, "` :�:
d� A ��,
�'�i�l��' ���L �a�
j: � ° .D
Office of the Town Attorney . e "�
75 South Frontage Road ' �;�
Yail, Colorado 81657 �`
970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157 ° ' � � ' '
TM
I7���0■9�9 O9�UD�ESfI
�O: Vail Town Council
�R: Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney�f o'"�
RE: Vacation, October 2 - October 20, 2000
�T: September 8, 2000
I am planning to be away on a wonderful trip trekking in iVepal from October 2"d until
October 2ptn
For approximately the last three weeks we have had the assistance of Lynda Van
iVorman as a paralegal for approximately 20 hrs. per week. She will be available
during the period of time that I am gone to manage in coming mail, messages and
items that require immediate attention. I will also make arrangements to have an
attorney available to address that unexpected emergency.
Thankyou
t?��RECYCLED PAPER
C7
!li89a�e �eo��ea°Assocaatson v. The �o�vr� of Vaol, e� a9.
Case N(). 00 CV 322
UNACCEPTABLE
1. For a period of twenty-five (25) years from the date of this Agreement, the
Town, as owner of the property on which the whitewater park will be located, agrees
that no paved or unpaved public road, drive, trail, viewing area, bicycle path,
pedestrian walkway or "stream walk" will be constructed or otherwise permitted on
Town property on the north side of Gore Creek adjacent to the Association's
property.
2. .... The Town commits that such landscaping shall be designed, installed
and maintained consistent with the terms of the Agreement, in a manner which is
compatible with existing landscaping on the Association's property, and which does
not materially interfere with Association member's views of Gore Creek.
3. The Town agrees that the public property and stream edge along the north
side of Gore Creek adjacent to the Association's property shall be designed,
constructed, maintained and managed to prohibit public use or access during special
events. Use of Town property on the north side of Gore Creek adjacent to the
Association's property for ingress or egress by whitewater park stream users
(kayakers, tubers, etc.) shall be prohibited.
4. ....."in its sole discretion,"
6. ....."be permitted to ..."temporary"
7. ....."located between the Pedestrian Bridge and the International Bridge."
8. ....."or during any special event held at the facility"
10. Special events, including demonstrations, which utilize the whitewater
park facility shall be limited to three (3) events, no longer than two (2) days in
duration for each event, per calendar years, and no such events shall be scheduled
to occur after June 30th of each calendar year. Facilities to host such events will be
erected immediately before and removed immediately after each event.
11. ...."or temporarily"
12. ...."or temporary"
13. ....."temporary or"
14. Loud speakers for special events associated with the whitewater park
shall only be placed on the south side of Gore Creek and speaker sound shall be
directed away from the Association's property. Use of loud speakers for such events
is prohibited before 10:00 a.m. and after 6:00 p.m. daily. Music and event
commentator use of such speakers shall not be continuous during special events.
Such use shall be limited by permit to twenty (20) minutes per hour on average.
15. Temporary generators, refrigerator trucks and other similar mechanical
devices used for special events, and which emit noise and fumes shall not be
located on Willow Bridge Road, or on Town property on the north side of Gore Creek
adjacent to the Association's property.
16. The Town shall provide the Association with advance written notification of
all special event permit requests related to use of the whitewater park. The Town
shall give the Association an opportunity to comment on the issuance of such
permits, including conditions of approval, as well as the formulation of special event
management plans.
17. All permits and management plans approved by the Town of special
events related to the whitewater park facility shall include provision which place each
permittee on notice of all relevant terms and conditions of this Agreement.
18. ......"specifically including crowd management for special events
consistent with the provisions of the Agreement concerning public access."
19. ...."deemed to be proprietary in nature"
20. Any damage to the Association's property caused by flooding or ground
water saturation due to obstructions related to installation of the whitewater park
structures shall be the sole responsibility of the Town. The Town shall hereby waive
any claim of governmental immunity for such damages.
21. The Tovun shall pay to the Association the sum of thirty-five thousand
dollars ($35,000.00) to cover Association expenses incurred inconjunction with the
settlement of Case No. 00-CV-322.
dd
n4
�'��l OF �A�L
Office of the Mayor
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
www.ci.vail.co,us
September 8, 2000
Mr. rl'om Norton
C,xecutive Director
Colorado Department of Transportation
4201 L Arkansas Avenue
Denver CO 80222
RE: Dralt 2020 Statewide Transportation Plan
Uear Mr. Norton:
The 7�own of Vail has the following concerns and comments regarding the draft 2020
Statewide Transportation Plan. The comments relate to the fiscally constrained Yroject
Appendix. We believe these issues need to be addressed.
When the lnte►-mo�mtain Re�ional Plannin� Gommission (RPC) prepared the plan, certain
projects within the Intermountain RPC region, after being rated against all of the planning
region's projects (see enclosed ranking), were placed within either the Highway 82 or 1-
70 Major Investment Study (MIS) fund desi�nation. These projects were never brought
focward to rank in our planning region's olher regional priorities because they competed
for different pots of money. 'I�hey also were not taken to the Region 3 ranking meeting,
which encompasses four Transportation Planning Regions (TPRs), because the money in
these pols is not eligible to the other tliree TPRs. These pcojects subsequently have not
shown up in tl�e statewide plan. This ranking was done with CDOT personnel at the RPC
meetings. We had no direction from CDOT that lhese projects would not be eligible for
7th pot money when we ranked them. If we had known, we would have included them
into the overall ranking and these projects would have rated higher than some of the
approved statewide regional priorities which are shown in the plan.
Specifically with regard to Vail: we have had in the last Statewide Transportation Plan
and the 1'own of Vail's Master Transpoctation Plan, and at one time even stipped for
design, the Simba Run Underpass. This project is a vehicular underpass of I-70 between
��RECYCLEDPAPER
Mr. Tom Norton
September 8, 2000
Page 2
Main Vail and West Vail interchanges. This project is needed for the safety of
pedestrians and bicycles crossing 1-70 in this vicinity. lt provides for an alternative route
1or emergency vehicles to get frpm one side of the interstate to the other. lt also provides
additional capacity to both the Main Vail and West Vail interchanges due to the fact over
35% of the traffic througll these two intersections is making a trip fi•om one side of the
iuterstate to the other. Removing these tcips from these intersections provides additional
capacity to the interchanges and prevents cars from backing up onto the main line of I-70.
lt further fi-ees up movements along the most congested portions of our frontage roads
and discourages people from usinfi 1-70 between these two interchanges as a way to avoid
the congestion, thus reducing the demand on this stretch of the 1-70 mainline. The town
is currently using local funds to further tl�e design of this project through the Washington
lnfrastructure Group to provide an alternative analysis for this project.
The second project in the Town of Vail was the LionsHead intermodel site. This is
specifically mentioned in the 1-70 MIS as the Vail intennodel site. We have been
working with the private sector to secure a site which would work for this project. This
public private partnership is a project we are very interested in completing. The addition
of the regional transportation tax for the Eagle County Bus System in 1997, has put
tremendous pressure on our current bus terminal. With increased ridership of the regional
system projected to go from 600,000 riders per year in Vail to 1,800,000 riders, plus the
over l,000,000 riders in private shuttles and the over 3,000,000 riders on the Town of
Vail bus system, we must make these improvements. This project just came out of a 2
year master planning process of the Lions}-lead area with strong public support. This
project is in a prelimir�ary design phase. ,
The third project that see�lis to be mislabeled is the water quality improvements to I31ack
Gore Creek on the west side of Vail Pass. This project is showing up as Straight Creek
improvements in Clear Creek County. The addition of Straight Creek was not discussed
in the TPR, which does include Summit County. l�owever, if Straight Creek is to be
included, the dollar amount shown was the estimate for Black Gore Creek and should be
adjusted appropriately to include both projects.
The last project tliat was submitted was noise barriers in Vail. The previous statewide
plan states there is a noise barrier program for the next 20 years and the Intermountain
Transportation Plan had identified these in 1995. The Intermountain RPC did not identify
them specifically in 2000, because we were told not to break out CDOT programs such as
noise barrier projects, safety projects, resurfacing pro,jects etc. The current draft plan
states the Noise Barrier program is only funded through 2002. We strongly disagree with
this policy and believe it will need to be funded throughout the 20 years. High priority
projects such as those identified in Vail have never been dealt with. The Town of Vail is
Mr. Tom Norton
September 8, 2000
Page 3
preparing a complete noise contour map of the Town of Vail to identify the wo�st
of these problem areas and to determine what additional areas are impacted but not
previously identified. Dealing with the effects of I-70 noise is one of six major strategic
goals of our current council.
The final project is the need to acquire the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way from Sage
to Leadville, if not all the way to Canon City. The preservation of this right-of- way is
critical to the overall transportation solution within the twenty year plan.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely
,_ � � u��,Gl��
- ����
Ludwig Kurz
Mayor of Vail
xc: Owen Leonard, Region 3 Regional Transportation Director
Doug Aden,. Transportation Commissioner District 7
Mick Ireland, Ghairmai� of Intermountain Regional Planuing Commission
Vail Town Council
Bob McLaurin, Vail Town Manager
George Ventura, CDOT
� . Tobls D(•7
Intermountaln Re lon HI h Prlorl Pro ects
� Fu,m so��oe
Pro�eot 81ete ProJeol Tolal SM B2 Ccrtlda 1-70 Corttdx FTA CDOT Reglon Looel Typs ot
ID HI hwe Cw Daearl bn B trinl LxNbn Endln Looetlon Sowa Le� Coel Proxt
3T-001 82 Regioti Roednp Fork VeOey Commumr Trandt Olernrcod SpAnpi BuGemdlk BB 5158,000,000 5158,000,000 Tmnail
3)•002 qeplon Carpool MeECfi1n8�M� Be 5360.000 f3B0,000 TUM
37•003 70 QarGalO Commular RaY SeMCe Vell Olernvootl Spnnga B7 3213,000,000 3213,000.000 Trandt
37•001 70 Eegle New INe�Omnge Eopla Co�mty Alryort BB 325.000,000 $25,000,000 INe�cfenge
37-005 B2 PiWn Entrance lo Aspen Roe0lmp�ovemenm Buhemtllk Aapen BO 2 538,700,000 338,700,000 Oeo.
a Slmbo OroOo Supnmtlon - .. . �. Mdn Votl kro!ai°^B?:,.. Eoot�al trMert?�en$a...w���- .63 _ 0.1 b10.00D:000- _...�.�:'La:a., � ..,.SB•�.�...�. Y.:.e. ...:.',.M;.s�. ,���v.:i�r�.o��nwv.�a?�e��, �..,;,a„°dD,,,�i,�+
�`" �Ed:vertie Spur FoaA.�widerdrip.oigielo ond',,._. . . . . . ,._ .^. .�,.,,...e
37•007 7o Eegis PadaetAen Improvemente ��p US 0 81 52,380,000 � 52.580,000 Ca .
.00B�. .�iMa�,,`.Ea�o,.> VaOUanaho0tl4domiodalCtr�t .�.:.'_�:a,.. :._:,.-.:..��..a..:............ ..c ;,�_..::�.. ..;_.:_�.c � -- "-81 � a:._:�.S15.00O.WO �:� .:;y.i._ r........8.16.000.Op1!'.;.3..:�xa:::x.�.--� A.Y.:�.Cl'•�-xe�K�r.r"?a;:..+dDa:::►�`vir?::T�
37•006 Pltkln Snowmeea Vlllege Mell TrenA1 Conbr � T7 SB,150,000 V� � $9,150,000 Tranci!��
37•O70 82 Plucln Entrance W Aspen Trencit Bwemdlk Aepen 75 2 SS4,a00,000 354,400,000 Trenslt
37•Ol7 8 Eagb Cepedry Impmveman�e Artowheed SIJ Ane Squaw CreeK Road 74 f3.000,000 $3,000.000 Cep.
37-012 70 Eeple FronlageRoodlmprovamentn WoelVall EeatVdllnlertl�e
D npa 74 $18500,000 . 58,500,000 35,000,000 $5,000,000 Cep.
37•013 �� 21 leke OeOmettle ImproVemenb Bottan o1 TeMeaaee PeaB N LoaANlle dty Umil 74 6.B 33,507,015 5�.507.815 q Oeo.
77•01� B Eegla Raplece Rdtroad B�idge In Oyoun ovsr US0 74 N/A 53,110,000 53.116.000 q Cep.
J7-Ot5 4� 2a lako CI4nD'ng Larsa Eapb•Lako Couny Llru 90.eke ot Torn.Paas 7a 32 512eo,00o 512e0.00o 1� Oso.
37-018 � � 2�Eegle OeometAC Imp�ovamento Jct I-70•Dowd JC S MinWm Clry Umlt 74 2.1 53,080,000 S3,OB0,000 � �eo.
3T•O77 Z,p 82 Pllkln MICIentlEutenelonUnaerpaoo MltllendAvenuaExeonelon SoutliBudnssePoOC 74 56,000.000 55,000,000 .7 Cep.
�7-018 ��p 70 Eagle PeOeeMan Overpeee al Ceeeade Vllega 74 $3,000.000 $3,000,000 8ike/PeO
37-020 (�� 82�arGeltl IntereactlonatMP3.70 74 34,000,000 f�.000,000 Cap.
,_ 37•021 �?._6 Ee e Ca ed Irt�rovemenl��,mv, EDyCroekqoed � Ee eTownUmlta�«_...� � 74 4.� . 51000000 51,000,000 C .
37•022 �'�,24 Eagla O•anetAC Improvements S Rsd Cllf1 Gry limlt," Bottom ot Tem.Pasn 73 B.8 � ~ 34.BB0.160 ��' 54.880,760 `� Gso, �
37•023 20 24 Engla Geomet�lc Improvements Whlte RlVet NF Enitence S Red CIII1 Clry Llmlt 73 72 $3838,320 53,83B,320 �� �eo.
37-02< ��24 Eagle Clhnbing Lene Eegle-Lake Counry Llro No.alda ol Term.Pose 73 3.4 31.785.000 $t,785,000 j, Geo.
37•025 70 Eegle Hell�diamond Interdierge us e�eag�e•va�� r.� o.i sz,ioo.000 sz,ioo,000 inie�wn9e
37•027 Eagle Avon Traneit Traneler Centar 73 f2.250,000 - 52.250.000 Trensit
3T-02B Bl Surm�t �somatAelmprovements BottomofFremontPeee Jctl-70(CopperMt.) Tt 2.B 51.474215 57,474,215 Oeo.
37-029 S�mufdl S�nrtJt Co�mry Park end RICe Loln T1 $7,800,000 57,800,000 TRnelt
37•030 B Eagle Capedy Impmvementn EeaeNall Artowtwed Sk1 Aree 72 527.000,000 527,OOO,o00 Cep.
37•OCit 82�ar0altl Ca�DOntlda PaM-enO-Rltle 71 51,500,000 $1,500,000 IntafmoGel
37•IXi2 Gerlleld Glenwoad Sptings Perk•en0-Rltle
71 51,500,000 31,500,000 InlertnoCal
5�001 Eagye Eagle Cowry Park-anA•RIEe lols Yatlousloceuom 71 SB35,000 5835.000 Intermotlal
5-002 Enple EI JoDel PeAC antl Rltle 71 51.500,000 31,500,000 IntertmGel
45•003 GerM1ald RFTA WIIe seMce,capital BB 51,000,000 $1,000,000 Tianalt
5-ODa 8 Eagle Oak fllCge Drive Pedec��lnn ik�tloRaeo BB N/A 5270.000 S27o,000 Pad.
45•005 B Surtvnit Cepedry Improvamento Bredcendtlpe Fdew B2 331,000,000 . 531,000.000 Cep.
5-OOB E Eagle ReplecaBAdgeoverGypeumCreek 59 N!A $1,Y02,000 37.902,000 Cep.
5-007 2� Eapla PetleelAen Setary Improvemenlu NoM ot Oowntown MInNm USFS lot 55 2.4 5302,000 5302,000 Pad.
5�008 6 Eegle Slgiellze Ihree Inlarsectlorm In Oypman 55 NIA S1,B50,000 31,850,000 Slgnele
85-001 70 SumMt US 8 Eroelo�Control,Strnlghl Craek EieerYwwar Tumal 54 SB,6o7,000 36.80).000 ErMron.
85-002 131 Eagle S�aAder vAdering,redigmwnl Jq US 8 hVolcott) 5 rtJles N ol JG US B IB 5.0 32,786,250 S2,7B8,250 �eo.
95-003 133 Oerleltl Cepedry Improvemante Carbontlele,MP 66.6 MP E8.8 47 22 34,700,000 34,700,000 Oeo.
87•001 82 Oa�fiet0 RFTA Bua Stop Enhencemenb Ve�lout IocaEOrw 47 5250,000 S25o,o00 Tramlt
BI•002 ,;;� 2<Lake Oeomelnc Improvamente 5 Leedvllle Cly Urtdl Jct SH 300(Melta) <5 2.B 51.�7�.215 11,�74,415 O� Oao.
BledcQoreGoakEmelanConVdond Walar .
67-003 70 Eepb Quallry VaIlP000 EeolVell 45 370,000,000 310.000,000 Envlron.
B7•005 Eegb Eegte Tmm6 Salellla Mdnlerance FnWlly 42 S2.0o0,000 S2,OOO,ODO T�annit
117•001 6�e�M1eltl I-70AaooeatlnterchnngelOSTiafGcControl a0 S1B0,000 3180.000 Oeo.
117-002' Bt Ee�o Nsw TraMe Slpnal 0.5 Mleo wlo MP 21 0.6 rttlNn w/o MP 21 10 5700,000 S 700,000 Signela
t17•003 6 Eagla Cepadrylmp�ovementa TownotEcgla U70.Oypam 34 525,000.000 525,000.000 Cap.
..._ 177•OW � 70Eoplo Cnpntltylrr�rovemonm.EbyCmekRoud U70 USB -----.... .'--'�a.`-'--'-'---- 19200.000 '-' --...-.--_-._�3.�4��. ._�------ °-'� _—�,____C2P...---
"'—. ___'.'-_._ ._".'_____'__-___,._"_'_"..'..'_ __�'___'....._....�.'_`_'__
BB•001 Z4 Lcko Ooomol�c Improvemanm Jct 9H 300(Molla) Lnke-Chatloa Co�mry Lhw 25 12.8 50,50E,880 SB,506,880 Ooo.
Totel Coet 5720,447,Q55 538,T00,000 592,580,000 5395,885,000 $133,502,855 $81,760,000
� ��
)O7�
COLORADO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAIVS
�����
�'°����° /NTERMOUIVTA/N
.'�J."'=F::..��'..1•. ..t!...�i
Financially Constrained Plan
Representatives of the Intermountain TPR met with CDOT Regions 1 and 3 and representatives of other TPRs within
the CDOT Regions during May 1999 to estabiish region-wide priorities from the TPR preferred plans within the
framework of fiscal constraint. Revenue projections were provided by CDOT. The meeting resulted in the fiscally
constrained element of the long-range plan.
Projects in this element are eligible to move into the implementation phase. The financially constrained plan for the
Intermountain TPR totals$1,158,771 including Transit Scenario B. See the tabie below for the project listings for the
fiscally constrained pian.
,. . . . r . . - . .
i � . - . -
. . . i � i . .
Project# Description Cost
387 SH 82-Maroon Creek Roundabout I 4,800
26 Summit County Park and Ride Lots I 9'221
17 SH 82- Intersection at MP 3.70 2,108
35 SH 9- Breckenridge to Frisco 32,674
12 US 6- Eby Creek Road to Eagle 1,000
18 US 24-Bottom of Tennessee Pass to Leadville 6,324
20 SH 82- Midland Extension Grade Separation 2,108
39 I-70- US 6 Erosion Control, Straight Creek to Eisenhower Tunnel 6,964
15 US 24-Jct I-70- Dowd Jct to Minturn City Limit I 3,246
19 US 24 - Eagle/Lake County Line to Bottom of Tennessee P 6,324
14 I-70-West Vail Frontage Rd. to East Vail Interchange �2.�2�
16 Pedestrian Overpass at Cascade Village 3,162
23 US 24- EaglelLake County Line to Bottom of Tennessee P 6,324
`'� 0"'��a"'I�"Cbufi `�Ai'"ott�New lnterchan�`e �
- 0
61 US 6- I-70 to Keystone 27,404
;;.�
55 SH 9-Bottom of Hoosier Pass to Breckenridge 3,315
!�' 68 SH 9-Silverthome to Ute Pass ��»�
y�-' 751,538
��`` 392 Transit Scenario B-Operating
���`' 393 Transit Scenario B-Capital 272,028
� f $1,158,771
Total
NOTE: This table summarizes information confained in the regional transportation plan. For more specific project
,, y;: information,please reference the source plan or confact CDOT.
r,..
.�;
`.:.��:... Page 929
,�':' _
Feeac.:aR�� 199.i DRAFT
'g'�ble 19 (�ontin�eec9)
��O'�' 7Cranspos•tatioen lEtegion 3
lE�ig�� Pp•iority �-Iighrv�y lProjects
PROJECT
TpR PROJECT DESCRIPTION COST
TYPE (OOOs)
11 Geometrics US 6 - Dowd Junction to I-70 (EagleNail) 1,750
11 Intersection SH 82 - Independence Pass TSM 5gg
11 Ca acit SH 82 - Basalt to Tiehack Ski Area 105,000
�i�A'9"�• 4 i ,�.`1' l'"�::na�'t^7i.'�.y+�� ':_'..�hpr �,�.';,. .: :-:�.: ..,:.:_ �.....,�, 1 :�..�..�� ��:3L.w .�^..h....si =n.i;,:C
°11 • Grade�Sep �� 5..,;_ 1..70=�Grade Sep Betwn West Vail �Vail � 3,300
11 Geometrics SH 13-Rifle to Garteld/Rio Blanco Coun Line 10,500
11 Capacity SH 82 - Tiehack Ski Area to Aspen 30,000
12 Intersection US 40 - US 40 Intersections in Steamboat 200
12 Brid e SH 13-20.13 MI N/O Craig (A-06-B/A-06-C) 1,500
12 Geometrics US 40 - Steamboat Sprin s to Rabbit Ears Pass 2,200
12 Capacity US 40-S End Winter Pk to N End Winter Pk 5,200
12 Geometrics US 40- Hot Sulphur S rin s to Granb 7,400
12 Draina e US 40 - Ha den Draina e Im rovements 1,200
12 Geometrics SH 131 - US 40 South 1,900
12 Reconst. US 40 - West of Muddy Pass 2,500
12 Geometrics US 40 -West of Steamboat Springs 2,7gg
12 Geometrics SH 13-SH 64 to Rio Blanco/Garfield Coun Line 10,500
TOTAL $310,320
COLOR�IDO'S?O I'E-iR TR.-IIvSPORT�iTIO�VPz.-��� Page 83
i
d �l'i�_�,�.I"'{�, . .��{Y._". . . . . . . .. .. . . . t.�
��"L�1 d�a +� '�
r ���T 4..+'M1:i�,���'�i��r �� ;M r:
a. � '�.�'.�9r�'.�bj��t�. �` .
?'r �w
y� .'�rt� v��' t'
�, 4��-;� , . -.,
�fi . :. .
�'`�`�r-�r � � �
„,�
t y r — I /_ r
��f'�j S�r C��R's�4� I l �_� I � I � � ( , {l•i I I,. '� I— � ��. �� :� � r, f � � � `tf r.' .
��
. �1.�l�� �� — i A�— 1— i _ I. � __ � i � � .
;� �- �5, w a
.::�r,� e .y p �,��x:� �
'� � ::y
�l+ g a _ ,e+`�,t k v,-•,":
���;;� If J —I �- � � — i�l ��) � ; , �,� " ? —, •, ; ' � ,�, ;j - � . , � ��;
� � z�. — � � ����� � .�—� � r���I � , � ,� � � ,
,
4.k.
� b�"' �) ��i � � " � ° r-. � � _ '� '- y i �k� "� y '
s`�;y�. � � �_ ,� , i i �-� � � _ 2 � ,_ � ' i ��j �`,j �rt�„�'a1�.;;
, � ,�,. ,
r, �`'. c
�� ��:,r`.,..
;��^ !�j?: "
: ,
,�� t -
.. �y'�'� l Fi�.�t
�1y
I
��F��L���'�
� ���� ,r
� � � �'� , � . � Pe ; , � .
� r - � ., � �
; , ,
,
� �
� � , ,�
'� i � �
'� V I � I � � ri � i Q / ,[_ �� ' , -, �- �c.�t ,�
� ��,�'`,� LJ �- t l�� f' 6 � � r^ i� ;� ��' '= i_ F�rs,� �� . .
1 � r _ i �,
� _ � � i _ �_ 4�' , sx
4�Y{ .
_ ����,� A 14�.
�l bGx J�`�.�>.'1�, .
+j _ 1 ��� 1
_ �M'�y'f�f.n� ., . .
ry {
0 �
'_�i' .y y3L] �� �.
_���x��Wryti
'�•..� e`v.p . �
I 'y" �_,_ ���� � ' � :
�� j �i � ,� }k.4^s � 'S
, r
s ��rt t
v �i'� �l � I 1 W4�� �'e ��
� , i
�
_ -f.-.,� : \ '" � s }s�-� '� t
� . - o. !�r{?��,r,��M i �,s�
_ �. ' ,�`
_ ,�y°4`+
'�* r���
' � i� �ol�"F� �
� �'' ;{l��}r�J
_ N:, ' •�. i� +{�c�+�� ,..' .
h �r � �! �SZ 1}y�,�'
�z4� �
i
, �if�.���
f � �µ� a
�� I- I i '� ,'`\�_ P�l r_ ��S•l rt }-� :
� m � �._ s t _;t i �M �� � : '
�'� }. r�`. !�.�si�:r:,.
� � �
�
����'�4��` � f �
• � )
h `
��� r . �- �� ,'
�>
. �S ��'
, H i�r�yf:k#,: _ n .L._ .
� 1
R
� f1� t 'y.%7T .yhi Q`��
§i y���yix4l.�. .:�C �}'�1�.
_V {�evt}`t�;, . _ ,� _Ja, - ..�.: Y'.
�.:�u t })��'S��� � _ ' .. �'..r .{�'✓..r V
,i.� `l+ y .:a. : _ ��'`• '�-Y..`kSS.
u
�..N1� '
:��t
.r�t y . �` �.� r `'�lit
r 4
� , r , ,E� I� ;,
�
Y � }y�,�;. .
7
�'r�t �`1�����`r � � � � �I���� �i i `�� ��1 \�
�''�$n`;:S';,;�°��"•'� �
! .tS r� b1���'��
�� ��r��.n
c'�
:.$ ��+7 �
��F y v�y�� I � � � c_ �1 — S � �!) �_.,( r�.� j,�' � ; 1 Y` r_ '' ( l� � ` `., i
. . , .
• � �. . y . � 9 . ! � -
, � ���`�'�� � � � f��.1 f��J �� ���.9 ��' � : , e� �
,. 4 ��
� � /` � �_� ��� I i o 1 t �, I �_�J
i.• � ,� ,r�� � -
�� } . k y.3A.�{��
� t f t� 'S
..,'M `.N•jy ,
�; �L�
'ti x�:�^'��0 4�.
s
6._ �.,�r ,�� �; ;�
„ �,,�,� .
! 'iJ4f���t},;,.i. .t.
e
� ������ tl � � `r ; �..�-. 9_ � i _� - �-.�
r �I�' ! I � � � � � �' ��
. i,���^ y-j �'�' _ -
a_y,�y S }r f✓if,�, .
r lo-�,,� �1''y r,... ;
. . � � .:C3 ��fl^�.�s����,y� 8 L� �'"?'j
= r��� r :
� �P��gr�5���°f3.,�t+k: ..� ��x:
,fi'� a
i �
�' - -
� Inter-Mountain Transportation Planning Region
Table II-8
� Known Noise Barrier Locations
� �
State Estimate
� Highway Construction
Number City/County Description Costs
� I-70 Vail/Eagle Vail, E&W of $292,500
Buffehr Crk. Rd.
i=70 Vail/Eagle` Va�l Post Office $936,OOU<:
� East
.- I-70 Vail/Eagle Vail, at Bald $180,000
Townhomes
1-'70 Va1llEagle` East;of Goif > $30U,Q00>
� CourSe:South Side
> _. ,:
I-70 Glenwood Spgs./ Hatchery Rd. $300,000
� Garfield IVorth Side
f=70 Ff�sco/Summlt > Betwreen lnterciianges ffi562,5QU,
;
Souiheast Side
�
�
II-27
�
,
. ,. ,
a
�
;PR ROUTE DESCRIPTIORI PLAPd COST PROJECT TYPE YOTAL REG PRIOR
°NW Trensit Center Steamboat Springs °1,500 Transit 9,5QD °
GJ2 340A Add TUVLTL and addilional thru lanes as warranted 5,000 Capacity/Add Lanes 6,5� 1
GV2 135A Gunnison to East River-reconst.,shoulders,turn lanes 9,500 Geometrics Safety 16,Q00 2
°°IM 082A Maroon Crk.Roundabout 4,800 Capacity/Add Lanes aa,000 3
NW5 0138 AAP 111 to ColoradoNVyoming state Iine 11,000 Reconstruction 33,000 4
GV3 OSOA Monlrose to Sargents/reconst.various locations 11,000 Reconstruction 44,000 5
IAA17 082A Intersection at PAP 3.70 2,000 Capacity/Add Lanes 46,�0 g
NW6 1318 CR 14 to CR 18 . 5,876 Reconstruction 51,876 7
GJ3 0708 Reconstruction to add turn lanes and aux.lanes . 3,000 Geometrics Safety 54,876 8
IAA12 Q06E Eby Creek Road 1,000 Capacity/Add Lanes 55,876 9
NW7 1318 CR 14 to Oak Creek 11,000 Reconstruction 66,876 90
GJ4 340A Add TWLTL and additional thru lanes as warranted 5,000 Capacity/Add Lanes 71,876 yy
GV4 092A Austin to Hotchkiss shoulder widening/passing IanesJove 13,521 ReconsVuction 85,397 'a
NW8 040A Entrance to Snow PAountain Ranch,YMCA o/t Rockies 1,000 Improve Intersection 86,397 y3
GJ5 006 Intersection improvements within GJ AAetro Area Study 8,000 Geometrics Sa(ety 94,397 94
GV5 133A Hotchkiss to Paonia shlders/passing lanes/ove�lay 15,000 Reconstruction 109,397 95
IM1B 024A Botlom oP Tenngssee Pass 10,W0 Geomelrics Sa(ety 919,397 98
GJ6 OQfA Reconstructlon to add shoulders and lurn lanes 6,OQ0 Geometrics Satety 125,397 17
GV6 135A Reconstruct SH 135/6th and 6th/Elk 1,000 Improve Interseclion 126,397 18
IM20 082A AAidland Extension 2,000 Improve Interchange 128,397 99
NUV9 013A Rio 8lanco/G3rfield County line to SH 64 16,625 Geometrics Satety 945,022 20
GJ7 070A Upgrade existing I-70 interchanges in Grand JunctioNMesa 10,000 Improve Interchange 155,022 21
GV10 065A Center turn lane(or SH 65 at city Iimits 200 Geometrics Sa(ety 155,222 aa
IM15 024A Dowd Jct to AAinturn 3,080 Safety Improvements 158,302 23
NW10 040A Kremmling to AAuddy Pass 20,000 Geometrics Safety 178,302 2d
IM19 024A Eagle-Lake County Line 6,000 Passing�anes 184,302 25
NW11 Q09 Kremmling South lo Grand County Line 7,Q00 Realign and Pave Shl 191,302 26
GJ8 330A Reconstruction to add shoulders 14,000 Geomelrics Sa(ety 205,302 T7
GV11 050A Intersection w/63.00 Rd-Signalizalion 8 TSAA 200 Improve Intersection 205,502 28
NW12 040A Granby 6th and US 40 1,252 Improve Intersection 206,754 2g
GJ9 139A Reconstruction to add shoulders,Loma to Highline Canal 8,000 Geomelrics Safety 214,754 30
GV15 149A Center tu►n lane 1,000 Geometrics Sa(ety 215,754 31
IM14 070A West Vail Frontage Rd Improvement to East Vail 11,500 Improve Interchange 227,254 32
GJ10 141A Shoulders and safety imp�ovements north o(Cactus Park 7,000 Geometrics Safety 234,254 33
GV17 050A Truck bypasslRR Xing/emergency access 150 Corridor Study 234,404 34
IAA16 070A Pedestrian Overpass at Cascade Village 3,000 Bike Facilities/Program 237,404 35
NW13 040A Within Steamboat Springs 1,800 Improve Intersecfion 239,204 36
GV1B 050A Intersection Study 150 Improve Intersection 239,354 37
IAA23 024A Eagle-Lake County Line 6,OD0 Passing Lanes 245,354 38
NNV74 040A Fraser to Winter Park 5,000 GeomeVics Safety 250,354 39
GJ11 340A Reconsfruction to add shoulders and turn lanes as warranted 10,000 Geometrics Safety 260,354 40
NW15 040A Tabernash to Fraser 6,886 Geometrics Sa(ety 267,240 41
GJ13 OOSA Reconstruction to add shoulders and turn lanes(Scenic 6,0�Geometrics Safety 273,240 42
GJ12 070A Potential new interchanges tor Grand Junction metro area 6,000 New Interchange 279,240 43
IMZi 024A White River NF Entrance 3,838 Geometrics Sa/ety 283,Q78 44
i�naa 024A S Red Clit(City Limit 4,880 Geometrics Safety 287,958 d5
NUV16 040A Granby lo Tabernash 21,056 Reconstruction 309,014 46
IRA44 024A Leadville City Limit 1,474 Geometrics Safety 310,488 47
° This project was prioritiaed as number one in Region 3 by al�four of the TPRs,with the understanding,
this projecl does not qualify tor Other Region Priorities without the approval o(the Transpo�talion Commission.
°° This project was inserted and prioritized by the Intermountain TPR as their#1 p�iority.Only the Intermountain projects were adjusted
in this list to compensate for this project insertion.all the projects for the remaininq TPRs were retained as prioritized at the
May 13th meeling.This action is requested by the Intermountain because this proj s initially thought to a 7th pot projec4.
TPR Chairperson signature required tor concurrence �
��;3��-� � 6 CI���s���� v���
y
\
. �
e9
T��I OF UAIL
75 South Fronta;e Road
Vail. Colorcdo 816�7
970-479-2100
FAX 970-4;9-2157
FOR IRA�EDIATE RELEASE
�e,:iemb�r 11, 2000
Cor�act: Suzanne Silve�thorn, 479-2115
Community lnformation Officer
KE1lIRf FOLEY tSSUES RESIGNATION LETTER
TO VAlL COUNCIL�4ND COMI�UNITV
(Vai11—Vaii Town Councilman Kevin Foley has issued a resignation letter to the Vai!
Co�ncil and V2il community to prctest ttie manner in which his brot�er's family has been
sea�ed by officrrs frorr the Vail Po{ice Depa�tment and the Eagle County Sheriffs
0`fice. Fcley, who is out of town due to the death of his father, issued a three-page
�ar�i-writte� resignation letter to Mayor l.udwig Kurz on Satur�ay (9-9), saying that he
nas jlost faith ir town government" as a result of tha Sept. 8 incident in which a stolen
vehicle was re;rieved from Foiey's brother, who had purchased the vehicle unknowingly.
;The fetter is transcribed below.)
Fcley was first elected to the Vail Town Council in 1995, in which he won a four-year
;e�rn as the top vote-getter with 540 votes. His 510 votes in 1999 won him re-election to
a tv�o-year ierm, finishing fourth, which expires in November 2001.
�Nh:le conc�rned over Foley's actions, Mayor Ludwig Kurz says the town's first focus is
to cffer condolences to Foley and h�s family upon the death of his father. Kurz says the
Ccuncil remains hopeful that Foley will reconsider the resignation upon his return to Vail.
(The following is a transcription of a handwritten note delivered to Mayor Ludwig Kurz on
Sept. 9)
Sept. 10, 2000
Dear Council Members 8�Vail Neighbors--
As saddened as I was at the news of our father's death yesterday, I am
even more saddened by the actions of the Vail Police Department and the Eagle
County�heriffs last night. My brother Dennis and my sister-in-law Betsey
purchased a min-van fram Alpine Bank � Leo Lala, a gentleman currently in the
(more)
���RECYCLED PAPER
Add 1/Foley Resignation
Eagle Co. jail for allegedly selling vehicles fraudulently. My family was aware of
the investigation and co-operated with the Vail P.D. At 4:20 p.m. on Friday,
Officer John Ferguson of the Vail Police P.D. left a message asking Dennis and
Betsey to bring the vehicle to the Vail P.D. On the advice of their lawyer, they did
not return the call. At 7:30 p.m., Officer Ferguson and an Eagle Co. Sheriff
knocked on their door and asked for the van. My sister-in-law asked for a
warrant; when that was not available she was informed that she and my brother
could be charged with theft by receiving. They acknowledged that fact and
thanked Officer Ferguson for his diligence. At 10:30 p.m., nine uniformed Vail
and Eagle Co. Sheriff's personnel served a warrant on Dennis and Betsey. I was
surprised that this many officers were necessary. Being hardened criminals, -
I'm surprised the SWAT team wasn't there. The van was turned over.
While I sincerely appreciate the police have a tough job and the law is the law, I
can't help but wonder how important it was to have this vehicle sit on an impound
lot immediately and indefinitely. To have been notified and allowed to make
arrangements for alternative transportation would have been nice. Compassion
doesn't seem to be in the Vail P.D.'s dictionary.
As a council member in Vail, I serve my neighbors to the best of my ability.
Having my family treated this way has caused me to lose my faith in town
government. As I can no longer serve my friends in Vail with the desire they
deserve, I would ask that you accept this letter as my formal notice to resign from
the Vail Town Council effective today, Sept. 10�h in the year 2000.
It has been an educational experience serving on the council the last four plus
years. The good times and great people I have met far outweigh the negative
moments. The time spent working for busses and trails will be the happiest
memories. To all the wonderful people that are Vail –the bus drivers, the
bartenders, the child-care providers, the teachers, the firefighters, the waitresses,
the managers, all the folks at VRD and the golf course, the ski techs and the bike
techs, the shop owners, the clergy, the builders and realtors, the cooks—all the
working folks in general—my thanks to all of you for making my family welcome.
To all my friends in Vail and Eagle Co., please remember—the next door they
knock on could be yours.
Love,
Kevin Foley
# # #
FROM : MUELLER`S SERVICE`S PHONE N0. : 970 476+4539 Sep. 12 2000 09:43AM P1
� �2 vv
��� ; ��l� ?�v v Co���c ►�s �����
�
�l�v� ; l�o��= t�v����'
���vNc ��13� �-�� � '��3�
���✓�T�C�C��L.�~ �
��s� -�� �vco�r���c�� � ���c-�,�-�� r,��
� -�0 �vo�s�, �r��y �� vs w�� ����= ���
��.� �o� � � �`�l`�� ov�. �7 �r/��SS �D�o�l ��S i�
.S'�NC��7"�2�C� r�l��s`?��'i� � �i�I� �./��� �I~2�
��.�,��c�� �v ��' ��- h�ou�.S ,4 ��� a
���J'� a5'OL� '�7��S �l S% a �o� �i� �`l'�LC;�
���� � ��f�/�I�s �¢- �3���'l�2S , %'✓� S�/tJ
��,u��2��S {�� �l�'��e��v r ��S'I c��I S /� �v2o e��=
��J CL,u��N Ej ���'— 'T�fl'i v�� l-0 i�1i�L�S �c��2 %7��
I/!�'� ,
3C-�c'l4 � �v/�9�,�/� s �Dv�� ���o r �� c�SE.1� �=-0�'2 ..
�� �RQ�vs� ��v���'r���r" �.v ;-��� �o cv�r2
�G�tJC� o�' ��vo��',�I�J /�i�-f2/� , d�C2� G�� s'��C�v���
CLOS� �ovC M 7� `�� ��o�tJ�'� r E i�'� �7`v 6�N��
J�wsU '� �or S� ��� �'�� /ZO�� ;�. �. � .
� �
�� ��v�Lv��� ,�}il1� �/� ?'�� l��/��� �
S��VC���Ly �
_
� � �
.. ,,� �
TOWfV COUNCIL SUMiViIT, September 6-7, 2000
CRITICAL ACTIORI STEPS
14 MONTH GOALS - COMPLETE BY 11/01 (REFER TO VISIORI STATENiEiVT
IiV ALL FUTURE DISCUSSIONS)
1) Ruins
a. Appraisal and report to Council on condemnation by 9/19/00
2) Hub Site
a. Financing in place
b. Complete buy-in to architecture - ready for election 11/01
c. No perception of foot-dragging
3) Donovan Park
IN PROCESS
4) I-70 Naise
IfV PROCESS
5) In-tov►rn Transportation
a. Kevin to transportation conference September 24-28, 2000
b. Greg Hall to report out by 11/15/00 re: alternatives
c. Presentations by vendors between 11/15/00 and end of January 2001
d. Prepare 5 year capital budget
e. Explore possible "sugar daddies" in re: to demo-type project
6) South Side of VTRC
a. Add $15,000 to current supplemental appropriation to draft engineering
study (second reading 9/19/00)
- this feasibility study will take approximately 2 months
b. Council to determine prioritized uses and mix
c. Draft RFP �nr/Council approval
7) RSES Athletic Field
a. Bob will re-explore RE50J's financial commitment for this joint partnership
b. Kevin and Diana will get the ball rolling w/various partners
c. Staff will assess site access/viability/possible inclusion of old Carnie lot
8) Berry Creek 5th Filing Housing
a. Before Auerbach contract can be signed, and IGA between the TOV and
the County must be drafted/signed
9) Consolidated Information Booths
a. Bob to contact Morter/Aker Architects for site assessment
b. Review alternative sites
c. Undertake/complete political groundwork
10) Special Events
a. Educate Council (prior to January 2001) from a first-time promoter's
perspective
b. Solicit input from local event organizers:
- WTCB
- WF
- Commission on Special Events
- Destination Services
- Etc.
c. Appoint Councilmember to "shadow" Sybill at Commission on Special
Events meetings
11) Fire/Building/and "Other" Codes
a. Set work session to discuss what Council CAN and CANNOT legislate, to
include: Gary Goodell, John Gulick, Tom
Moorhead, Greg Morrison, Russell Forrest
- Clarify what is "black and white" vs. what is open to interpretation
- Discuss relative merit of adoption of each code and liability without
- Set work session prior to 12/19/00
12) Parking Pay-in-Lieu
a. Discussion scheduled 9/26/00
TOWN COURICIL SUMf�iIT, September 6-7, 2000
CRITICAL ACTION STEPS
6-MONTH GOALS - COMPLETE BY 4/15/01 (REFER TO VISIOiV STATEiVIEIVT IN
ALL FUTURE DISCUSSIOiVS!)
1) Community alignment and partnerships
a. Post banner in Council Chambers by Tuesday, 9/12/00
b. Define/clarify legal and political leverage w/VRI
c. iVotify VRI immediately o# Council's intent
d. Begin report out to community at "Peer Resort" meeting, 8:00 A.M., Friday,
9/8/00
e. Reinvent Community Task Force as a tool
f. Set Breckenridge-type Council/VRI retreat
g. Define desired outcome by creating a vivid visual description for 2005, 2010,
2015, 2020
2) Hubsite
a. Appoint two members each to the 501(c)3 and 501(c)4 Hubsite/White River
Institute effort
b. Staff to coordinate current calendar to neuv "marching orders"
c. Provide "marching orders" to design team in October/November
3) Donovan Park
a. Schedule RETT discussion (2 hours) for September- desired outcome: 7-0
unanimity
b. October 3 - provide clear direction/timetable/construction calendar so bid
process is completed and contract signed
by April 15, 2001
4) I-70 Noise
a. Complete contour noise map by October to identify degree of problem/sites
b. Identify options/study how and where to apply CONCURREIVTLY - due
10/3/00
c. Identify available funding sources
5) TimberRidge
a. Written report re: "partners" to Council by 11/7/00
b. Re-zoning action to commence immediately thereafter depending on report
6) Maintain environment, both natural and infrastructure
a. Discuss weekly Council "lunch" location under OTHER at 9/12/00 work
session
- create schedule and publish location
- combine w/walkabout
b. Obtain Disney standards - Russell
c. Turn It Up - incorporate stewardship theme
d. Reinstitute "Adopt-a-Path/Street"
e. Discuss budget to make it happen and allocate dollars
7) Wayfinding
a. Prepare schedule re: timing (within 8-12 weeks)
b. Approve shop drawings
c. Install upon arrival (before Christmas)
d. Trail identifiers installed by 4/15/01
8) Communicate w/County Commissioners
a. Employee Generation PROs and CONs memo to Council
b. Set evening meeting w/County Commissioner candidates prior to the start of
"early voting" (10/23/00)
c. Draft/discuss a model employee generation ordinance which would be valid
for both the town and county-wide that can then be discussed w/the County
Commissioners following the 11/7/00 general election
9) Public Improvements Financing
a. Define WHAT the public improvements are exactly and estimate COST
b. Draft memo re: all reasonable options for financing by 10/17/00
�,,
�
u
d�
TOb�I OF YAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
September 11, 2000
Ms. Cheryl Rondeau
1613 Matterhorn Circle
Vail, Colorado 8]657
Dear Ms. Rondeau,
Thank you for your letter dated August 29`t', 2000. The Vail Town Council received
copies of it as well as Russel] Forrest, Director of Community Develaprnent. .
When the lottery process for the Town of Vail housing program was created the Vail
Town Council felt that it was important to reward people who have lived and worked
within the Town of Vai] for the longest period of time. With that goal in mind the point
system rewarding longevity was created. In order to remove some af the tension from the
process the "lottery system"was also created. Council believed that this system rewards
individuals for longevity in the community, by placing them in the top tier, while still
placing an element of"lottery chance"in the process.
The Garmisch Lofts project is a unique situation for the Town of Vail. The Town is
neither the owner nor the developer of the project. As a condition of Town Council
approval of the project, the developer was required to work with the Town to line up
purchasers for the deed-restricted units, who qualify under the Employee Housing
Guidelines. This process is being used in order to ensure that qualified individuals and
businesses are purchasing the units. Finally, the owner/developer is also compensating
the Town for its time and effarts through a 2°% charge on the units that are sold.
The changes that have taken place in the design of the units have been based upon
feedback that the owner/developer has received from people expressing interest in the
project. To date, the largest change has been the inclusion of 14 two-bedroom units that
will be deed-restricted. Information from the Eagle County Housing Needs Assessment
shows that the need and demand for one-bedroom units is the most underserved. With
this information the owner/developer believed that this would be the strongest product to
sell. Input received after the iniiial building design was complete showed that the
inclusion of larger units would increase aemand for the units. If you have further
���RECYCLED PAPER
v
Gre,�ory I�1[. Amsd�n
2702 Lai-kspur Court
Vail, Colorado 81657
September 25, 2000
Open Lands Committee
C/o Town of Vail Community Development Dept.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO. 81657 -
RE: Proposal to Purchase Lots 1-4, Vail Meadows Filing 2
Dear Committee Members:
I am writing you as owner of Lot 4, Block l, Gore Creek Subdivision(5166 Black Gore
Drive) and as representative for Robert A. Rymer.
The above referenced lots (East Vail) were recently listed for sale by Mountain West Real
Estate. Lots 1 and 2 (21,763 sq.ft.) are listed for $135,000 and Lots 3 and 4 (26,560 sq.ft.) are
available for $110,000. All four lots are listed as priority acquisition sites in the Town of Vail
Open Lands Plan. The Town of Vail acquired Lots 5 through 12, Vail Meadows Filing 2 in
1992 and subsequently overlaid Natural Area Preservation zoning ("NAP") on these sites.
The purchase of Lots 1-4, Vail Meadows by the Town of Vail represents a very strategic and
beneficial opportunity.
1. These lots are surrounded by Town of Vail owned, NAP lands that abut
National Forest Lands on the east and south. The lots are located at the
confluence of Gore Creek and Black Gore Creek with impressive views of
Bald Mountain.
2. There is a roadway easement in place that would allow for a pedestrian bridge
(similar to the bridge in place at Stephen's Park in Intermountain) to be
constructed. This creek crossing would allow residents in East Vail(especially
children) to access the beautiful forests just beyond these lots. This "walk-to"
access point could be utilized year round by local residents as well as visitors.
3. The neighborhood residents have shown strong opposition to any residential
development on these sites in the past. The goodwill gained by a well publicized,
public purchase of these lots by the Town of Vail would be substantial.
Voice (970)-479-0337 Faac (970)-479-5278
My client, Rob Rymer, has recently contracted to purchase Lots 1 and 2, Vail Meadows Filing
2 for $130,000 cash with an Apri14, 2001 closing date. His intent is two-fold. First, he wants
give the Town of Vail the option to purchase these lots (by assigning his contract rights to the
Town of Vail with no price increase). Tlie Town of Vail would have to commit to the
following actions:
1. Purchase Lots 3 and 4, Vail Meadows Filing 2.
2. Change the current Agriculture/Open Space zoning to Natural Area Preservation.
3. Deed restrict all of Vail Meadows Filing 2 Subdivision to prevent anv residential
development or structural improvements from being constructed on said parcel.
Lots 1-4, Vail Meadows Filing 2 comprise l.11 acres. Given the contract price of$130,000 on
Lots 1 and 2, and the list price of$110,000 (which might be negotiated in the $80,000 to
$100,000 price point) on Lots 3 and 4,the value of the total acquisition is approximately -
$210,000 to $230,000. There are very few sites (especially properties which offer public use
benefits) available to purchase within the Town of Vail at this price.
In the event the Town of Vail does not initiate action on this purchase proposal within thirty
days of the date of this letter, Mr. Rymer shall pursue development opportunities on Lots 1
and 2. I will refer Mr. Rymer to a protessional planner and advise him to also contact legal
counsel to aid in determining appropriate zoning on these lots.
If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me at 476-8610. Thank you for your
time and consideration in this matter.
/� �
- f � ..___�-_.__
m��re Y f '
v �f � 1.
.*E ,'� �- _�1,,
U V �
�_�f , cSr'�y 1V�. Amsden
1 _ ,
, - I
_ __ - � .Y�':...�.: . / ..
� , ' �'�'�'�►•�'��e�V���
' �• . '�'���'�'�-��•��������
� ; ��`�'�-�-♦ ♦-��-�►-�..�.��.�L-�.�.�:
.�'������������ ..i►�:}�,�.r.�.�•.�►.�.�.��.,
i�����������t'♦ - ����1��� ��������i�'�
.i���-����-����-♦ � ►-�����;j�. �.���i�r' ,
- �.-������♦_���j� .�:�:���51� . �,1;-����� _A- ^, � ,� �, A,,,},
_ � �����������,,�����:�. ,`�:+;�� , m.. , r,..
���-����•�.������ �=� �1/���. - - - - � ,' .
1 ,' " Z, ' i'�!�1•�}�1,-��•�•�� �7'�'��-.►-i����� �������i-�
� . A; >. , �i������b�����������'���� > �i,,����������'���t�;��� `���-����,.
i . . 1�-�►-� ���-���•% ����� ♦��1����� ♦� ♦��� •�-���-♦ ,
' f�-������������m �.. ...`,i►;i�/,►�j�•�� .����1�1`�•�•t►�1� ; ����1'��- ;�;' �,�� , ,, � s , t £ �
►-� ♦ f=1 �.,t . .. � �- �� � � 1 l
� � r ,�•�'� ♦-���♦ ��
' : - �� - . �!-�.►y���.�J� �r� �.b��,����,�,.�,��,t..,���,V��•1��. �1`-�����. •������j_ � _ ' 1 1��'A4 � _ _ � ��;.
- ��•!�•�- ♦•�` . -1� �.�� ����.����: . •.�.�.,����� ���•�•
� � .� � �. . . �•;�`1!��,.�.�.��►.r �-♦ 1� ♦ ��
" • , . \ �� , �"�°�'�'��� . ♦V�4�� •��. � . �•���-�-�1��� .��:�� � . ,�.� �
- '��:�:��!�1' .'�`:���!�!�!.•�!�!!�s''i���i'i!i�i!�����%�;. `���%i� . . •., 1 P ; . , k� , , ,
. �_ .���.�.�•-���-�-�w�.�,�.���.►����.�� i�.��♦
:- :� � , ��, � � ; • � , � � � �� �
' �����v-.-. �-����►�����.►��r�0�►������:�► �'�����-�� ''1 �� A � ,�
��-�•��• ���-1 ����-��������� �°�����-�����: �, , < , i, -
� ►����-��� ��1► ♦����►�♦�•���������0 '►J�� ,;�������:�.�s�.�.�. � •��`
. i�-`►��, •�t.��!���♦ � ._�•�.�.�>,►�,�.��������� � - 4 ,
►����• ►-���-���►•�• � . �-��,..�-����,������1
����� ���� -1���. ' �. � , :. .� ,
��;l, � �.�:����� �•���������//��-�-��� • rr'-•� � ' , �' �'� �
` '►�1 �►<�♦�� ♦�������� :
• ♦'�'�'�'�'�,�'C:..•�.� A,�_���d� .. . ' ' • I
�pj'�� .� ,� ( � 1 . �_�"�''�t�!�1,�����/-�-�����'��`�"�.� -a :'�:.� 't i �
�' �'�'�'�'�'���''}�'�.�.
��� � " : l�� �� . ' ��'��� �'�'�:�.�. �..
�•,� ' . , ' � .. ���'�'�i�'�'�'��`�'�'�"�"
� � , � � �, • ' � ♦'�•�' = ♦��'•�'�•�'�'-�•�`�-:�•�Y�.�►-�•�.�.� . ' �+
�� lr' ; �r`f, , ,, . , . � . ', - -
_.i, �, � � , � ,� , , � ,� . ���1;.�-�. -� ����•►�_�-�►-�►-�°�������-�����.�,�) - . ' �
�,+,T♦ _ ♦r�!!-��0��-�{�����i►���������.�����,1� � • ��
tj. �'`' n. � `� ,�'.�`
. . ;� i <►������ - �������►�������1►�.�;�A�.�.�..,�+.� , �,v
"°�. w� , ►♦ ������ ;`�'���'�� � ' ? ' �' ; 1, ; l ;! �� ; �
• ,�' ' '. "►���J'�\�L�/��"w� ��1s.%��;�`_���� ' ' / �y "b `" �
• -.. s�' �::�"' `�r �-�=-=�►.. �.lil��� �
� �. >.�. �� ' • , � .'. �- . . � . - � -
• • � " ��� :
• • • ���� ' ,�,i • { � � ,� � � f i
� � � '� �:�iw,� i� • 1 E .
� � � ���,�"` V .
�� �:> •� Q�' � �� �,� •� � � • � ( ��.�. � � r .�. ,,.�.•�
•� � .� `'"�''� .� �s s �e � • � l -• ' ? � ' a
�� � � Ii � 0 � • •'� r � �8 • •� � i' �,� l � ►,.- �. � r R � � � � h�i
� � � � � • • • � �, � �'� � 1, � /'" �� '` e..�t �� A- 1
.,: • �
• � � � • �'� � • � � :� ` i � s�`�.��,. � �.�
.� il •� a�� � .i �.,� -0 :�\
'',j � /-; �. � � ' `.
•
• � �� �
� � � I• ' � �' � � • � • • � . � �II�� ,
� � � � � • • l� � � � � � � � �� •.• � • • � . ' ' �
i� • � � � � y � .� � • r � � � � �� � �� � �' I,
• .�., ,� �: �, � � �: � �, � • •
• �� � • � • • � � � � (Y� • n
�ti • � t, • � � • � �. • • � �:,
� `�. � - .� � � � . � � � � .
• � � � �, � • � � �
� � � '2,� �� � " � • ,� • � � � � � • �`�r
� • S � • � � � � � � � � � • �..• • • • •{� �,� �`� ,�' � � � - . { �°`
_ � � � ':` �� • � � I,, � �-'��s: -� � ��..
� • � " .,� � • - � �
�,,_ I., ' -,� � ri • ,t! � �' � � � - .� � � . _I, .• . 4 • if •
@,
� •-- � • • , � . `I •� � '� � � • �'�M� i �l e� f`. •
•
• t � E� �f� ' + �-- f• ��.� ?� � . '1
• . � � � � `� `� �� � � 1 � • • �� • � a�
• � " ,� • � • • 1.
� � � � � � � °� � � � � � � � � � � �,�� �. �����,
� �.!� • � � • � • �i • • 1 � • �"'` �'�� •
� � �
�� �.�. • + � � '' �. .�� � • � �.Y �^•,,.,e,. �s��
�� �. � '� � � • ��e��• -
1
� • � � - {�
� •�•. ,�.� � :�'�� '� � �� �_.- �
� • • • !i `• . _ S I •.,.� • •� •M • �;:.> � <.:� a . -
� �
�y � � .� � �.� a • • � � "'. - �g�
� I' t.1 h � ,�� �� � r ;�:a�,. ,4� `� ,„+�°
• � • • � � � • � ° ���.. :w . - � • ; ��.
• �, t . -:� �
� • � : t: • ,��,,< ; � .._ . � _ _ .� � �..
�_• • �• � • � • : � � � � , � � � ,
-•, �, � • �• � ,`�=r_ � �� �`f � '� .-� i�
� �
, , � , ' ; • '
� �:
,..�..,.-=.a..,...,�..�........_..�._. ._. .
�WN � 0/AOL. ZONIPVG �EGEND �
SII�GIE �AAAILY RESaDE�dTIAL DISTRICT
��= N T�IO FAAAILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
� TWO FAAAILY PRIMARY/SECOP�DARY RESPDENTIAL DISTRICI'
� �,':� RESIQENTIAL CLUSTER DISTR6CT
� lObEl �OVSITY IIAU�TOPLE FA�IAILY DISTFdOCT
. `
� �IEDIUON DENSITY AAULTIPLE F�AAILV .DIST�i1CT
� HIG�d �ENSIT'Y �I�LTIPL� FAINILV DISTRICT �
�� �LOC /1CCOI�IO��ION DISTROCT .
. � SPECOAL �VELOPA�EBVT DISTOtICT
(�ID GENERAL USE DlSTRt�CT
e°• m COAAAAERCIAL CORE I �ISTRICT
� CORAAAERCIAL CORE 2 DISTRICT .
�''� C�9MERCIAL COFiE 3 DISTRICT
�� CO�IAAAERCOAL SER!/ICE CENTER DISTRICT
"" AGRICt9LTURAL 8� OPEfd SPACE DISTFdICT
� � '` N��rua�, AR�i� PRESERVi�TIOr
� ���vv s��vecE nisrRicr �usT�iCT �
.
� P1�R@(ING DISTR/CT � _�
'- • ;_, . AO?T�RIAL �USINESS OISTRlCT
�' S6(6 �ASE RECREATION DI-STRICT
� HILLSIDE RESIDEIdTiA�. DISTRICT �
r.��t OUl°�R RECRE�►�'ION �OSl�.I��°
NOTE : AtdY LAND , LOT , OR SITE� �IIT.NIN TH� TOVNN OF VAIL
AAUNICIPA�. 80UNDARY WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL
ZONiNG AAAP ,DOES �OT 6iAVE A OESIGtVATEO ZOiVE DISTRICT ,
SHALL 8E DESIGIVAT�D GREER� �ELT AND 6VATURAL OPEN SPACE
ZONE DISTRICT � �
' �� 1/ ine Ta,a o ��� �! -' ._ __ '_ __', — 1
Y )ta \ �_
/ .. .. \ \�� :�_.. i'. ��_: __i�r i ;r� \\� -4y1��'�
. \ o }` . _.
� ,es� //////\�� �` - — �• °'��.��Town 8oundary
1 . / '\ r E` Sc 2 ' •\ �.w_ - �.aoe�+_-..u..,�csn-�-.
d)6: aBi6 � `0]5 50]'1 �0 'Al� \
�5 \ �� �\ ' S0]3 l ) 5
'\\� �tB) 18 ._....."___ `n!i`�'t�
' ' t981 \ � �—— <G 7010'S SOBl 500� 5101 311) E
`�S
e
��)6 19 �81G �9ai \ '__`, a 317i �
at99 � '•, 54]0 �
18 _.��J��: 5171
1
y .e�u � __. P w» sar GOaE ORNORIH r.
•i8] �9�0 5 ��'.\g '�. C� 5��1
� �917 �� St1NOW. �0 �
f3
�)�B �x0 ���, PM�vll ga�6 S��B � Sf5]
A 51]6
1)91 S � � '�.IJ �
1931 tA
�i ia as:c .. san 2 soes � s�e �E u
s �e2e N59 5 i� �R� o s+s�
.,az a .�, �_ , ,,,o
�a •°" 7 ��A� �36 HO S BDIVISI AD 5 5166 �
° q, +5� 6 �g>) ,- " CEDAR POII
+eoa 1 $ �eJi �oJC � 2 ('� su9 m sv1
p �8t0 Q ✓/.. �99] SOBt '[M_ e
O � ?� 1ie "N/p "'C�
� .ers FR� � 3 RC�� siso 5
siie
�Bf] 8 � �w6 �� � 5189 10
.eie � �. e � K M �D �
.ese •aes , �ses saos wte sue S sier
� 9 AM �
�B�S �VBS = Z� IO Sttt SIQe
n o � w e sza „ r 9 /CEDAR 1
sa
t �} ` �C99 " '0 � � 512i 3/75 Z j 5tl8 519]
11 H08 �9l9 �9 W Sula � a Stl7 13 TR�CTw E
NSi �1 D l000 Stle SI]9 S199
�OJ9 0 �] � ^ y li ' �
` B� H B01 SION AD ON� a J EMIOUSE `' B s�ss s+»
. ��
/ � S BDIVI ION �R 5,
us= �e wu s � LY u
� ; UJpI.wTTEO 3 il t5 �9)d �9B 5115 S�lt 5 G9 51�5 1515 51e' � / HEATHER'
' . � �!1] �BB9 5 3 E �� 5191 /
� �88] �� � SI1J 5107
l • l6 `� � mJ0 � 513] 57l5 e .
- �s�e ro 1�`
�" ' �T �� HER F VAI
� y� �x �O� � � 5 � / � I
� y� � s�as � s�ee s tc �
sas �� �O/ e�oe sue (
� G � .
. [; ��' ma 6 r e
511�
]3 512] st '-�� �
� /B 5 B
�. 50�7 �� ��a 51]p �� �
� � az e �
� sa�r sii�
� ° ' F
. ���� ������� � J��� a° � ., s�°s sis� stor
�� � s� so�s c�,P r s 1
� �' � �� s�a � 5i]e � 3109
� ��
mn �s+0 J9� rn� ,.A °
m�s G'�5- G�� s7�o
+o
' 1T 51�i W '1
. �= 11
n �s� V L M O S:,�e ,s'�„ s:„
tA�l.�j 'g - :� ���
o ,o„ FILfN 1 „
Z ,:
m : sis. e:
� SNUM1�SHOE lN
� ' � � �(.IG �jeC
a � �� is
` wo: s�ss s�s. sie. � ./ �+ w•o.
� „� zi � / " � `^' �
, ,.1 �, , i �� � � • i � � a, .
�� �
�� � ,
� M
,•
�: i
',�, � '
;
o.
�� ��
'.{
. � ' • � � � ,� �
!
'�
�
.;�
�
i . • • _� •
;..t,
, I I1
� � s;;:,
5�:` 11
�� ' �
��.t�� ' :l 1•
� �,�` ,f� -
� �� '-r �
• @ 3� 4
��, �I
�� 2�_� �1. _ FI
t �n 7 R
..k s,�� ���5'. .s,.
. Fr ¢-, f
.�"- 1
' :a'- i
� �Y,�� -
� : %
`� �
e
:�� �' C
Y 1
t� �
.- - �i � 'r�i'.�'�y'''�'�r'`"i"^�.�d
a r�"+L �ti
t £' C �� � �'i
} . S'+�i a �.�� � ,�ri.k , � -. y�,A
�z. g,,.� g'.r , .i � -.� '
{�"�� �- r� v�r � y���� � �su' li
:� ) r� p _' r.w�.j . S4*,�.
'�.!`� �'�,�}?.,f , � �. ��'S i` :+,� � , .
T� T � � }
w
a�4�+����� L�..� �t� 1� r"e a.,:
a e.�a�`2' ���t � .;A �yr �F,'� � L -'.
� 1.. � :(g�£S"�?,�x .=�� �f 5�: . �"'•
�. . i t Y�e+u" ,� �+`'.. .. � .�.
a.: ��Ly,. �� . .. ��Y � f c. I
�Z �� �` � ��� � �������pl�
�S' �+S�y } . +1���j ' �• S".A 1 .}'t:f
rts'°,a�.��+4 -.� � �s�.,i -�y � � � � ����
3��� � k� +�iF � , � -t r..
+��dy�.x,h��-rt� ����. � �
� �,�r-�����¢ -�' }'� �,� `` '
i zP €�? .�r.zi9�;�.'°� � � r' ` 1 , -�
' .,ir }k#"i.1 y�;��i'c�i.4.� M..� a �� + .rn 4t i.... }I . I .i+ 1)
. �r{��"1 e�`°'r"ti�`� �' �{ � "' " '�i,� � ��s .
r '9
� ��=`'A3 y}�KY�� � d 4 hi � �;
�.��� s! .�r ��,.'�'Y �5Y �.. 5 v ' !.
� r
;.� , � .s��t�- ._ � < <' ,
. ,�.kJf� .::���t`" flA�:r 4j��` a:.. '� Z-�� �
� �� ..�r17{i`� ��ry5�« � .
�n '�� �' ; r
c i
� ��.
,.�r._ � �ba
� { I i
w t
' +� a ��4� �.. =i � / I
i � �
tv s �,+rn
7.�&fi-.: � r�� r
r�:t"�,.�' ...�;
*�F�� ��i y.V��, � •
�S
tk ��.'"y`3 n
� �' T
�,� ,�, „��. .r� � � r ....
Y-� �'�� � �y`�
i;�. .,„`�_-' .:ti'�y�5t7 K
l'�t .. �� 3�G q
� �i � � �S 1
7 � �
t�'t 3� °�ra.�v'- � 1 , / �
�i 7 .� lf:.
f=S :�"
� �::�
c -j-.` (' -� �
,;�i, �" _ ,.r� 3 { � 1' 1 �►
• _
�- �
� �, t�
, �
r� ,�
, . 1`
�;�_:��- � - -
:_�f::
G�S 9. �d eo �,,�,�u,� �
X C:<�
" ll � � ll�l�Ln,� ll �O�� � ll ll"11 O� L1 ll ll
��� @NAU�$eo� 593,7�0
� _ S�auv�u�e� (es4.) �87,000 �,
`� ��� ���A� �,000,740 _
�
�
�
� fl��
�
�
� �
�
� 60
O
�
� � � �� �" � j 4 '�:
�v_
�1
� ��
�
� �
� � � � � � � � � � a �
� � � � � � � � � � � �
a FELSBURG
�Q �-[ OLT &
ULLEVIG
oh�Xl Vail Parking Study Update 00-062 9/8/00
� N�nl°u���� p���uu�� �a����u�� �m�� G°3�ec��a�� �a.flmn�mr���I
Q��o�l�uu���l ��� �o��l �u���6�0���1 ��o°a���a��°�sD
�a��°��u�m� f��� Q�D ��r�����tru�u�� f����u�a.��
Q�I�a�o°�D ��B�u��es �c��e�9 ������oa� (�)
0 - 0.5 0.00 135,730 0 0
0.5 - 1.0 0.00 80,254 0 0
1.0 - 1.5 0.00 85,631 0 0
1.5 - 2 2.00 34,139 60,708 68,278
2 - 3 6.00 33,106 158,192 198,636
3 - 4 7.00 15,340 94,623 107,380
4 - 5 8.00 23,732 167,948 189,856
5 - 6 9.00 40,804 306,769 367,236
6 - 7 10.00 29,583 245,658 295,830
7 - 8 11.00 11,899 93,950 130,889
8 - 9 12.00 11,002 89,582 132,024
9 - 10 13.00 2,987 26,926 38,831
10 - 11 13.00 2,986 26,926 38,818
11 - 12 14.00 371 3,793 5,194
12 - 13 14.00 371 3,793 5,194
13 - 14 14.00 370 3,792 5,180
14 - 15 14.00 370 3,792 5,180
15 - 24 15.00 1,832 23,686 27,480
24 - 48 14.94 2,556 38,181 38,181
48+ 45.35 677 30,705 30,705
���al 513,740 �,379,023 9,�8�,892
Acfual Revenue as Percent of Potential Revenue 81.8%
' ��L1�1� a t� ��� �L1V� ` �x �
`� �° ° ��aC�� oO�I� a�I �D :�' �d��1���
`��°�����t�Q���s ���D���
���� � �D��� �����
Pa�� ���D��� �4� %�
R�v�nue pe�° T�°�ns�����n $�o��
� $2,04�
�ion�head $300�
it�venue pe�° Pa�c� T�ansa�t�on $6050
d FELSBURG
�� I-I O L T cSi
ULLEVIG
oh#3 Vall Parking Study Update 00-062 9/8/00
_ �� .�: � s ���I�� �� �� C� �� -� � �� p� j�a �
���� � �
� �� �y� N �u h�� A��� �
� 14 D�y� L�onsheaci F�Iled
� 10 Day� �ronta�e �oad C���d
� FELSBURG
�� H O L T &
ULLEVIG
oq�4 Yafl Parking StudY Update 00-062 9/7/00
= ��O�I�aC�� � e �osa��= I�� I�I���� � �� �r ��
��� � ���� �������� �� ��5���
�� ��� ����� ��� ��
���o � ���o �� ��� ���1
��go / ��e�o �fl ��� ��°�1
�a�o / �e�a �� 3 2� 4th
���o / ���0 4 ��� �tf�
�uno / Feba ZO 213 �s�
`�ue�o / �[a�°o �� �9� �ftf�
�a�o / Ape��� fl ��� 41 s�
�reo / Febo �� �4f �2tt�
Sato / Mat�o 1� i06 i3th
Sato / Ma�°a 25 �� 27t�
FELSBURG
�� HOLT &
ULLEVIG
oh�5 Vatl Parking Sfudy Update 00•061 9/7/00
= C� 00�1 a�D ��M��I��
C�OI�1��D� ° ° �QOo �I�
� �n���fl ����°����� ���������� � �a� :
n��a���� ��v�s� �n� � s� �o �
Q��O� ��a��� �g �����0� p��n� ����� ���� �� g���� �aff�,
�� u������� ���a�����
`fy ���� M�n�mu Annua� R�venue Expe�tat�on $ a 5 M
aFELSBURG
� I-[OLT �
^^ ULLEVIG
oh#6 Vail Parking Study Update 00•061 9/7/00
Vai/Parking Study
POTE�lTIAL ��►R6C6f�G SYST�M iVIODVFIC�4T10filS
�,4SBS FOR D�V��.OPII�G A IVIODI�IE� COIVIPREHENSIVE PARY(ING PFiOG6iArVl �O�i V�4oL
�� �� y'� ���,�� ���� r �� ���e� �3 ��✓� �� � ���`` �„����'� ��`�` �'��`
� �Council`Po(�cyeTDirect�onlln,put�- :'; y <„ � ,�� Suggested Res onse _:� ��;. : �
> �
� P � �
1 . Provide a_ ..."Perception of Develop a Revised Parking fee schedule which
value for skiers." incorporates a S 10 maximum daily charge.
2. "Encourage shopping and dining Maintain 90 minute free parking and free
from down valley." evening parking.
3. Adopt..."Yield management Develop a peak day parking fee schedule which
i.e., supply and demand, incorporates a $12 to S 15 maximum daily
optimize use of parking charge and increments at 52/hour.
structure."
Consider summertime parking fees (e.g., $2
fixed price, pay on entry).
4. Provide..."Product variety for Provide 1) premier valet parking; 2) covered
multiple customer needs." structural parking; 3) reduced rate frontage
road parking; 4) free remote parking at Ford
Park and along frontage road; and 5) provide
bus service accordingly.
5. Provide..."Employee options/ Maintain debit card discount; focus upon
considerations." employee user group; price according to value
of parking and cost of transit service. Match
6. "Make transportation/parking transit service to employee schedules.
work for employees."
7. "What can we give away? Recognize competing objectives (e.g., value
What can we afford to give pricing based upon demand versus need for low
away?" cost parking for certain user groupsl.
8. Maintain..."Consistency - no "Smooth" jumps in parking fee schedule.
surprises."
Balance 1) peak demand management; 2)
revenue generation; and 3) parking facility
utilization.
Eliminate pay in lieu program.
Establish parking program for entire season
(year) with no changes mid-term.
� FELSBURG
�� HOLT d�
ULLEVIG
� = ���C�/�� ��C�� oO�I�
R/W R/W
I 63� I
I I
7' 2' 11' 4' 17' 11' 8' 2' 7'
Parking [rCr���tl9�� �I�[S �E7�� ° lt�l� 0'Cl��l���
I � � � I
R/W R/W
I 82� I
I I
7' 2' 18' 14' 11' 11' 8' 2' 7'
1Tf}l1���L��1� �lY�� ���ES ° u"fl��ti�IlC! I � 1 � ' � � Parking I
I ��l I
I , .,_. : .._ ., ,._ .._ �__ _ . ... .-. I
��1���% ������� ° k�T�Il@f aD'�1��
� �� � � � � � � � � � ��
�
�- J �-
a FELSBURG
�} Q H O L 1�" &
ULLEVIG
oh#8a Vail Parking Study Update 00-061 9/8/00
� �IOo D����D ��� ��3�IC��I�3� C�OI�IC����
�� ���� ������� ���������������� ������������
������� ��� Q�� �$�
� � �o� � � �
�o� � � � � �
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
� � � � ��
� � � 9 10 ��
� � � �0 fl� ��
� � �� �� ��
� � � �� � ��
9 � �1 �3 10 1�
�� � �� �4 �0 �5
�� � 24 1� 10 �5
a FELSBURG
�Q HOLT &
ULLEVIG --
oh#9 Vall Parking Study Update 00•061 9/8/00
� ���I�I��I� C�O��a ��� ��Oo �I�
��v�nu� p��°
��������� ���� ���� `��°������e��
� . � . ��� � �D 17 � ���Ll D � o
������ � ���
�����Ll ���� � �Dc���DL9 O� � �D���D� � ��oc��
`�V�Itt��° °��a� �7�D��� $6�4� 06 � a47
Sum ��° $ 74D $797D000 $ �0 4
T 7°AL 3D� 9g�57 $ �559�6�9 $2056
FELSBURG
�� HOLT &
ULLEVIG
oh#10 Vafl Parking Study Update 00-061 9/8/00
Vaey Pa�kinp SYUdy
POTEf�!'fIAL PARK1i�G SYS�'�fiA f1l�ODUFiCI�TlO�lS
��+.�95 �OF$ �E�l�L�Pli�� A flflO�BFIED CO�/IPREHEl11SEVE PAFZKIf�G PRO�°aRa�tV! �OF� ilo41L �
. ., ... . _ _ -
--- . ._,_, . . ..:....:...: -
- - �•r.; �.,, ";:.:
�..... ...._,.;--�•;, •
7--:�..tr-'-'-',.t..�'. ...;.':-L:•'.•�'•'�.."' ,,:7�
.. . , ..� . .� ....•,r'• ..:.�' ""'.'+�•'•"',. _
_...,.. ti
�..:..�.
" . : ,
_%.L'.
..:.. •. �.-......_...�_��..: .. _� .. .:�._......:.'.•.'...:'�'r h..�
- .,`.7:::
.r.�..,.,.. i._ _ :�:1:�
.:��c..x.
-_x�.:
... , .._. -._�..:..�.,.-..... ...,. ,
- '•.`x`:., �_�..
�.:�..,.� :.�r,:�;,—..o-— - - -
;,1..:�" -.1' ...�:..� .i.l-. - ��h'!MVG.q�. .J�, .r.�1.�_�'!:
_ ..f, 1 w ..:.�...o.��w:ti:,.'...'...�
- ' .v rpi'� ",t.r.'__
�...�..:-:.:;.�.: :.,-,., _
.,;.,G. a' rs'��iiot§;r�n'.iitf<� - �Si� ��'
.. . ..... .,.
.,.. . . _ ..,-,•
. ,.,:.� . -. ' -
, ., .
.
... .. , ,., .
::..�: .- a�1r;�...iI;�P�i4,c�Y'�A.�.�. .�. ...df.....p ,'.s: .c±�k�s�s.�i;���,::.:..�,�.�..:.
.::z�,:.:.:�, ,:;..:.
. . .:.
. ....:..: . ..,..NWS�i:':._. ...:. . .
1. Provide a ..."PercepYioe� of Oevelop a Revised Parking -Fee schedule which
value for skiers." incorpora�es a $10 maximum daily charge_
2. "Encourage shopping and dining Maintain 90 minute �ree parking and free
from down va(ley." evening parking.
3. Adap4..."Y+etd management Develop a peak daY parking free schedule
i.e., supply and demand, which incorporates a S 9 2 to $9 5 maximum
op�imiae use of parking daily charge and increments at $2/hour.
structure."
Consider summertime perking fees (e.g., Y2
fiixed price, pay on enYry).
�. �rov+de...°Product variery for Provide 1) premier valet parking; 2) covered
multiple custom�r needs." structural parking; 3) reduced rate frontage
road parking; 4) free remote parking at FoPd
Park and along frontage road; and 5y provide
bus service accordingly.
5. � �rovide..."Employee opYions/ Maintain debit card discount: focus upon
co�siderations." employee user group; price according to value
� � of parking and cosY of transit service. fVlatch
6. "Make transporeaYion/parfcing transi4 service ta employee schedules.
woPk for employees." ,
7. "Wha4 can we giv� away? Recognize competing objeC2ives (e.A_, value
WhaY can w►s afford Yo give pricing bas�d upon dem�nd ver�u� need for lowr
away?" cost parking for ceetain user groups).
8. fViainqain..."Consistency - no "Smooth" jumps in parking fee scheciule.
surprises."
Balance 1) peak demand managem�n$; 2)
revenue generation; and 3) parking facility
utilization.
�liminate pay in li�u prageaen.
�stablish parking program for en�ire seasen
(year) with no changes mid-term.
� FELSDURG
�I �1 O L T �k
ULL�ViG
_.,: �, �US 9•d(�•o� �l.�e,��'3
�a����IC� ���I Oo B�J�C�Dd��
� P� ��ct� it�n � f P� ��� Ty���
� Va�u� ���° �ke��°�
� ����a����� �h��p��� � ������
� ������ fo� \/alue Pr v� �
� ����c� Ma�a������
� In�r�ase Phys��a� Pa�k�n� Su��1y
� Pe°odu�� Ya�°��
� Empl��/ee pte���
� Simplifj/ Mana�e�nent Process
� ���s�st�n��
� /�ffordabiltty of D�scount�
� FELSBURG
�� HOLT &
ULLEVIG
Vafl Parking Study Update 00-061 4/12/00
. p
Ba��C� I�a����I C�
IMIL��I/�C��I���I� � �° ° �I��Oo ��
� ���I �� ��� ������ � �����Q�� ��� ���� �������
� M� ����� �� �� ���� � �k� ���� � �u me�° Pa�°Ic�n�
���� (N�w)
� Thr u�hout �k� ��ason Vll�n�er Park�n�
F��� (Ite��s�d)
FELSBURG
�� HOLT &
ULLEVIG
Vall Park(ng Study Update 00-062 9/21/00
. q
�����a r��� �c�a���a� �� �� ����
��� ���I�D�I���
������ r��� ��a���a�
���� ����
�� �o�� �������� Q��� ��e���
Q�����D Q�� Q��
� � �o� � �
�a� = fl � �
Il � flo� � �
�m3 � 2 � 4
� � � � f
� � 4 � �
� � � � �0
5 � 24 10 12
� 8 g s
7 19 4 30 4 10
14 16 20 11 17 il 17
� E1 Y7 18 19 24 IB 24
FELS�URG 28 27 28 2B SO 28 E6 EB Sl
�� U O E V I G sl ^��
Vail Parking Study Update 00-062 9/21/00
� b
V 1__l ��1__l�� L �0�� V �O� V
����� P��°�o�n� �o�g��° ������n � 1���� ���� � ���
�� ��� ������
C���¢� [���� ���°���u°➢Q�c�afl [���°I�u�� ff��° $�g��
��e��°�e�g���1 ���c�� Q��� ��9�� �n� P��{� ����D
���� I���s� d�m���� tt� ���fl ��������� ����
�e�tr�c�e�l �ae�k�a�� ff��° ���� �R�a�a����l ���c��
�.leminat� / Refund Debs� �a�°�
��°e� �ar�ken� �i'C ��� �Ex��p� �e�� D�y��
��onshe�c� �� ��xc��g �e�� �ay��
�ord Par°Ic 185 (Except �umnfl��° �iana�e� Days�
�occe�° ff�e�c� ��t f� (Excepg �umenee° M�na��� ��ys�
Fe°e� Al� �vening� A�t�e° 6o00p�
� FELSBURG
(!�a HOLT &
L� ULLEVIG
Valt Parklrrg Study Update 00-062 9/22/00
o �
1__1 1__1�O L1 U L1 L!L1�L�L��L� �J Ll!1�V
� �� Pa rl(��1
� �u���� ��� �� ��� ������
� ��°��QmQ� � � ������ ����� ��
� �v�n�n�� D�n���/�h�p ��
� f� P�ak ��� �� �Isnu���
� P�ak D�y� � Menute� �4�� �� �� ���o ���°k��s�
� ��`�lili��° ���`l(lil� 226 �p���� �� Vel����
� l�iaximurn itates iteciuced
� Of� Peak Day� � $5000 En�our��e D�nin�/Shoppin�
� Peak Days � $3000 �n��ue°a�� �°�°an�e� li��
FELSBURG
�a HOLT SL
ULLEVIG
Va71 Parking Study Update 00-061 9/12/00
, e (,�5 ���1tc•be �Q,�,�t
G�v�lo����o� p6�c� oc�c��Oc� o� ��c� M�oO M��Oc��y
MpD�.1�C�
Presentation to Vail Touun Council
September 26, 2000
by
��y ��s�, �eade� a�� Supe�aso� �ntoanologes�
Gunnison Service Center
USDA Forest Service
Roc6cy f�lountain Region
Forest Healfh nAanagement
l�ac�gr����t
f�lountain pine beetle (NiP6) populations have been expanding in the Vail Valley and
surrounding areas since 1996. In early 1997, the USDA Forest Service, Colorado State
Forest Senrice and the Tovvn of Vail initiated a cooperative effort to assess the mountain
pine beefle situation. In �iay of 1997, Gunnison Service Center completed an
assessment of the Vail Valley area that included two key components: 1) identification
of the areas ofi ongoing mountain pine beetle activify; and 2) the susceptibility of
lodgepole pine sfands fo mountain pine beetle infesta4ion.
Results of the assessment revealed abou4 200 acres of beetle activi4y as of 1996. �Aore
significant though, was the fact that approximately 98% of the lodgepole pine stands in
the assessment area were iden4ified as moderate or high in regard to potential for iV�PB
infestation. Once such stands become infes4ed, models predict substantial amounts of
4ree morfality.
Since 1997, management effor�s have included: annual aerial survey of the Valley to
document areas of beetle activity; annual on-the-ground assessments following the
aerial survey fio validate and refine impacted areas and to identify current year's beetle
activity; direct control effior�s (tarping and commercial and non-commercial removals of �,���,J�
infested trees); prevenfive spraying of individual trees; a bark beetle behavioral
cherriical (pheromone) trial; continual informa4ion sharing via the media; public meetings
and an informative field day.
�@�P��PE� �9$1�9��60W �
The year 2000 marks the fiifth consecutive year of significanf mountain pine beetle
activity in and around Vail. Federal, state, municipal and private lands are being
impacted. An aerial survey ofi fhe Vail Valley uvas completed during the summer of 2000
(see atfached map). The map documents areas of fiading trees that were infested in
1999. The Colorado Sta4e Forest Senrice (Granby office) is currently engaged in
assessing beetle activi4y from the summer of 2000.
The mountain pine beetle is part of Colorado's forested ecosystems, as are the people.
The challenge now and in the fufure is to meet the needs of the latter, given the
disturbance/change "nature" of the former. VVhen impacfs from mountain pine beetle
activity are deemed, "unacceptable" in certain settings, management options are
available to forest resource managers and private property owners.
Among the primary concerns at present, are the degrada4ion of aesthetics and property
values and the increased possibilities of wildland-urban interface disturbances such as
�rildfire and avalanche. As a resul4, several YVIPB-impacted sites around the valley are
currently being evaluated for possible treatment of mountain pine beetle and stand
condifions.
,
VVebsites for more informa4ion on i�P6...
USDA Fores4 Service, Rocky iVioun4ain Region, Forest Health Management
e�so�ecflea�s/��6��a
Colorado State Forest Service
.�o����a$eoedu/D�pts/CSFS/csfss�gnnt
��,.�
f�ti �
:??'"v
i�:r���
� ��.,�...a,�,r. .
r:':��::'.,
����r
�;:,
�"�
s��,
� � -
�•
�
USD,4 Forest Senrice
Gunnison Service Center
216 N. Colorado
Gunnison, CO 81230
Phone (970)641-0471
e-mail rmaskC�fs.fed.us
.
MPB Activity in Vail Valley
(data from annual aerial survey)
. .
,
� '
20000 � �. �
,
; �.
,� �� ` - - ,��_ ��
-- _. _.
18000 ' ' —
, ;�.��. �._.� _,. .�
. � .
j, '- .i ���7',', '' TM�r ' '"ti-!u`A'�.+,�.. !'� ,
_
' '
16000 ..�+ �` � t �--,�"�_;�r '
� �- .- rv�_ _
� _
, , - -
` - �� . .
� W���. ����.�~.�-
14000 � ; � ,� _ - ..:.��
� . .
;x � � �4����
� � �C� � ,�,�
.A�� �,,��� _,����� f �M .
1200�� �lr - _ �,-�-��' � ,z,� '�---_---,_..____,..,w1 ."� ..
��x. -_ -
.. . . ,�,.. . � . �
� _ �_,,,,_ �,. .,� . :.A � -►W-4, .T
' �M� *i�� ti ;, ' �__� !�� � w;.�`- . :
# of dying trees �0000 , - -
. ,.
.,
�
� , �,- ,.. �- "�.-._ �
� ��; � .
, .
� . ,. -,. , ^• ,�,Y ,,.. -�►,�,, .r-
8��� � ' �` •�-� _ �'
;
+�, -� �._.� �._ � ,M �
� ro '� .� , ,�jy �o�y. . I'.i. ~� � ..11�, -
� � ry ...
• �.. - � �'' _' �
'- � � ' . 4�"^ �
" ,� -..e i.� . `__..
f)000 ' -' �,. ,. � °� s -n. II
w`„� ''�., � "'��''LL-'�f:.�� �
, �. � j ,
!. _ .+ :,`k '�n . . ,,.� � � :�"'� ...
�_ I
4000 �� ����
- - --- ___ _
� , �
_ � �
2000 �
I
0 I
�
1996 1997 1998 1999
YEAR �i
�
��. \ 1 :` �J��'`. . , l .��. � + � "�=� ,��� __ S� - iT". .��/,("j' � ,ua, r I ' i - �I Y�,� ''' 9f i>�,:
_ . , _
. ..
. -,
. . �
•j;�a.� - ^ � ��'. . • , -'��,' _,,Yt � - � 'ss _ )J °�y - �?. :�`�.��y4 - �/ - Y'� �
- �
� �_ \ t , _'� '^wa�t+t!� r. '�t 1 �y r ��� y.n -. .. s�.�' � r. �1
:�.'! -C._%���,.� ' ,1. ,�' -- A'tr t_���._ "St J � f �,_.'f� 'S --� -�.:. '"^'��bY�" ` - � "�l'_. ��{�- / ��`� 4 r�
, i. 'r�;�=,,� i l A%5y - •rL '. .+.!.-+,;V� F_ 'i�
;,'� �� 'L� � .�'� t .-.�� - Y�'• '' j �, . I :'.f.! � � i�,..,� ,!'-��g � _ 1f �T'�,;:�� ._
7 .\i'..�./'�y ��-.� I ac.,�' � �JJ 1;'il� } �� r, :;: r _ �( � �
,� � ` 1(� `. - ♦ . _ �'.� rf .� - f ��,� , M t �� y r� '�f'. �-'�. ?h� .� '� �i�.;y'� ah:�'t -
c � ii� ;:` � /. !� '`���:".�/. � � +,-��L.,� .�_.�....�:.a -i �, tsf � "{t' \ `,��M�._ �`7 . �''� � �.Z..�.. ,"�': y� -
�
�.�j�i � S�r�� �+ _ � 9 '/ �rl � r - . t�- _ �^-_L._' �- '�,,` l��. .�+ ' 1 .���'r:. �i i"7 ��'•: �. •i���, � � �
! '' �I i ✓ l- ��-L� � �� _ Y I i . '.� �'.: ` - j. F
a J�';i� ! �: � yf,� �� ..�--J ,' �o'' "� '� } ..,,r ::"t;' .•f i �^� ;/ , �tir,tE` a }�} r� .';� J -
•�. a'i ,� - .- ;v ,`' ` ,,�t 1 �-...- I '�' . s ` ^�; r
'r,r v i�"'J f rrl`•' �' � �;_� " _ ti i� 'j ' ','�`- i ':y':���' P}�r l _ _�,f',r�: :/:; ( l` �� .�,..._ .i s�,�` � ,r',�^, y:. -
� ,g�f.' i'V � ...(' �`:• ( � �'i,5 ..r�. y�. �i i t ' ����..
� ('. .'►T'j'.i„� - 3 i ~ � .' t�'` ~i � �.. t�! ,T.0 - �t "� \,.,1 i �. ;'�� S ( i F� ,�;r �.,�j,
.3'1 L '(.,"k\.� ` y•'r,t- :t `'' �J��--- '` f \ �.. �7�f,. .a {�p � i 7 `'� 2 .i�_ i
�,�•� � � ��.^ :j— , 3 r� t�''.�. _ � � `� ' 'v� � u 1i� l,r'� 5 ��E
; � ' - ��
� ' , , ' t ,
.� . , _ � � , i ,; .� ,,. , ,:.
.. , , . � �. �
.-. _ , . ; ., .�.
r i� � � _ �^J�i' <: O Q � i 'r. ,, � � �k `
�`� �� r �-��'' � ,-f ��_ � \�'1 t` � �i � ��. �����` � ,���� ti 7 f� �i1 ,, �` .�, 4 .,�.,.? ...'
�` ''~�''� - '�s "'� �`` - C.E. ' �.,. . ��/(' �� � _�t i 1;
'y,�,. �`-;� � .', ,r �.�/ -1;. .r� �.-, . 7 , �i, y� _ �E,d�� � . 'l�=��y� � t.,1. � .. � y'L��::;.� � �.,.�.c.� L';.� I
.�, ,.f J�: �{s'._ y` �.."t~G �,i ., , {� _ ! r.�A; , �t ' rJ - �' ` ' �. .� r�i t• '�� r ��: �� '+' I
� l
..,, ���( � ,...,7� f '� ,��_..':- ��� _ ` r�� ,r �� .�� ;! . f �; .� 1 �
. J .. I
,.-7, i ':� i -: �/ �... ;i _ � . f���=\ � �.� �{,°S�'-:i-� �. ��� . r' - � .��� `�,.� fR-� �S, �
� � � ,� ���
. _. `_ ,� ,.� i Il'._` � ��-' _ �'T�i .' �.L' _ ........- ' " ' '_ J '- ,r
. •
,
. ��,
� � �' � ��* O� � I
. , �
' 1- � �F� V�� .� .�l^i""^` �'`..�. � � � � � ��,YtiL .e�-•,�
• ' r
_. " " . ;�^
.
� •
i 1/..�. �. �:� '�'�.� ♦ . . J' . jr.' I I� : . _ {", P�t"' `�C'd�4
� .1 1 r� `�,, , �+. , , � i��',?i � b': � � _ �' _ ,
; .
� � -� �G' ,�� �� �. qA. �. � � _� ',� ` . '- y, �"'' � � :
. �
; ;,
�
- 4.� .� �. r +�
.
.. _j t . �i c._. , o �.. i j '4�t+ _ r,� j - i V f� i ', .
. •
� - .
- ' ,._. , , ,�. , ; 't
, �
_ , ' ..
�- . .._ �,..�, � �o i ,--.: _ �w _
. .:. , � i
_ . _ ., - : ;, , . . _ .- -
� � ' � n �� � �
,�.
:,,y .'�� �. �: •. .: �.,_.- _" r,_�. • ..�`j..._._ ..r .,; t , ���.+%S 1�'.U.- �, ,�� �o ����
� �
�� ,� . • � .� - ,. .:� � .w;.� � '=" , . _ `..
, . , �i�r�.
� _
, „ .. �
+�
�1,.� , - . _ , .,.�.,'� •,; �, �; � �� � -t
,
.. '._-.. _' .. :.._.� .f� ' �" ' . � . .. . , �, , � � �; �
,
�-��!i� . . .. ..Wy. _"i '�..+/ � � l_,�1,. � ,.. �.�� � �.� _ 3t 1 a�, .
� .
_
'=1^ ��'1 - � :1�� �0��` ��`. .S- _` � ���'.I�' �"'�� f .�.:. ,,,� '.� �� `� � ��. ���d \�+,��'. � �.. ..�� .
..+ Avo�e .. . ,.
-- �. ..-�- ,:. .
. i��
b �'� `. �"Ja�: i'i ` .i, `�,:,� "1,'�.�,`"'j �t '�.�. �'�`'-'`� 3w _"�,'. __ - -� N �� �� •''� _ ��
,` ,^"�', ; � ^' ' ' `i,.�, ..,.ti.:, ,� .}.;r ��` �� i\ �� � . �., �� _ t sy t �, :
����1. �.J . � ' !^,. •� ' �::-1 ' �}- ..�����p - �r ,i. . '�' ' ?-.�. ,�"..-,.-� ��� r„� _��Y F t �� _.. �'a,i
� �.�r' , � _,�. . _
. r�.1�� lr,�'. .. •. .; ' k`'r�;�.'� .�.a���..._._. �..�. , . ._ ,�_• .'" } �� . {�:, � '
_ ?� �
. . ,
'
' '' ' L". , .. �. �, �`-`:..'..' --"I '� .,. -w.�. 1�'. �' - . . F�-4r-.-
_ �,, , `'�"�` � { °,� �'' _
5 :_- _ p�
t �`' i�s- l•/,'r t 3; r �1•.-� _ y „` � •�; 1 I r �� • I"' � ' .
j •1� t '_•4 . 4] �' ;r:. � i . ± ki �- ,'-4 '� i $..�e.1t, l �}�
�� ��p� �, 4�L }t �•`�P�� � •'•t, � � (. _ - � -� - t :io � a.;�� * 1Ll
�� ' "•.''1"� � — _ k'� _ E
I �•�_.. � ` - --� ti� +. � � � ?1 r t ---.-ct t. rr.. .� � _ _��
�� , \' . f� � + ��,� �+. i _ `"�� "� � � r ��_ � �E_�� .� I t c.��.' y ���rr 1 � 'i
�. . ,
��, � , . ; .� . .
_
r �� �/} ,. � .�` �a v�l s . ' 1Y " 7. �v x�. �
. _ _
: " J ': : _.
}(.� " , f ..1- �� . . ';...� . ,I• i ,'�s�t'1 . '.�- �:1 `!' .,� f' ( c."�� ,^j S , �: � .
!`. . � -
.� t A:, � f�• eir,,. ;� . .. .� _ _ . _ . ~ ..�+r'S �r�- �..�' ��: i '�^-:.__;( �� �� !< <°
Y
.
._ '� ., . .., T . �., _
,. • .: 1Q�,�
�
�
.y,--y.-�_," ."�T^/Y :. . � i��,_. ` � c,.r.� �'. _ . _......_. �i. . -�_"` ' .. _ '�tl�u C t" � e"�� ..r..,.r.:�} r --� � �
'� ��, i . .� . ._ � / . -.
. .._ . . . .�- . ..� , �:
.r
_
.. . _+�. �i . �.� �.,�s �- ::�r' . r T.�' _ i�" � '� �l.'"-�' �'•7. :y Sr'i ji`'"-^: -i "'�'1--�� '�
4
. :. .�� ,.. �. �� .�. �h..
. . . .; � -`. .
. _ -.- �- ""_ .. i`�..�- ,_.� _ �
, . ,�i:. :, ``,,� ,�� - .;, - . ,-,- ; �:�� ;r` Y. .t d
r . � .�
.t� .n� ' .��t�:f .l.'i-. .. . - ;� {.-. . � -. �1 �. - - . - _ ti,
. � F..!
I .� � � � ` _ ,. - � - .
� �� /��+. - - . . . � . �,. ,�. . .�.->� t �y ��' , ���r !�� � .�� , `.�n..� �, '
, . � .. ,. .. , �- , ,..
,' •
`�., (� .., , j�.. ,.- ..�:.. . ,.�.•' ,_ -'� I i�Y C ' �', � .3r'`S - { ^''� '
i.
. : �_.. -- 'i" ' " .
, . . �.:,. d . � •.' � ' � , y •.` . . - . �'
� R
°, „ �, . ;.. . . „ �. i� . ,I: __ ,,; , � �
Y : `, k
, �•. I � , .. ,�� , . • •. ,. ., .. , � r f
Y
,� x. . _ _ . .-. , ,��- s _ �---- _._ _._ .4 , . .. . . . . ,� _
� � +�
;�,� � , 'j � r , � r,- ... 4� � .� _ 4�'
� _L'� >_.,:� __. .. � 'ti; 'r� � � _ _ ��`'s ��t�.' �, i;' F ��' ��1.:�i , __p S V},
��__.i..�. . � ` - -- 1rt4y!i!� T•-..` t � �� � � �li �
� ��:. l --�- L «,�.,: i !
� ' i . - b ,.�,..' •� � M1,a ' .�s���'�' _ •� � t� �� �� �' �.E 4 -.'� ��Y •,.! .-.�. c�3..,{. 'S _„7��,� �'_ ,'1
i�.. -.y.� � ��, I.;- �..� � .
� '�` - s , ;., t�' i'� ,� �'.` '� t� - ' Y/.��� -.c,t `.s1 I� . '� -� 7;i �
K�.;� �,SRi :i `f.f '��.�� �-''�-� 4 ��, j �r"� . _�.�. '�*e .-"" . 1 ,�}� .':� �e:i �. � J ��� .
. �� .r w \ ��f �M1 � �i ,�'
,.�; � . f ;� - _ - �z '� j� ' � i 4'4 ` `'tig�fi �: �•.� 4 (' ,� � `� �
.�., :.:�; . � 1 � �y(�a�
,. - ,__r,.__ .
' + ' � �_} . i - 3 ') .t �\ y
��'�"'� �--r�-r�-�-�,sr• + .i.,7• �'1 � �1� - `�, i�� _� . \� /4�_�`'!.
I� •i , if ,e � � , _ 1�,, � :r fi. ���� .��`E �
y ;
, , ,
�� ��� � � �y`�' �
� , �i ., r _
, � , - .� ' ,�,, +.�...�'
r.�<,'� . (:�� ; .. . . .. f � Y , 6 .��pM'�' � � � i 3� r
t � !t' �� i � � �. � �; �F
�f`� ��. � � .x�c ..L.' 1 cyi� f-' ' `� , i f ,`� y '��Qj' ��'� ""7i/ � J�i c.�ti `._ spi.
r q ii' � ' _ J 4 �' ��� , � rs�' s �, - .� t ,,�� 1 � �3�;',� \i� � .,�,_ -^q� ,�
rti,;� p �� r t .� s7 :1'� � +I "s;� '�I�„ �� - 1 .,� � y�y. �I� ` _��� _�$a ,`�. .Sf o � I� �_ �.�r ti `�.
�.\::� .1� �r �l �'`�,�� � ,� Y . �' r - �• �� �'/; ? S '�r t .ja, -.%'.. .
. :
� i ... .I � -
rr . ��,, � t'. � \ �� S � i- ,� , -/ / ` _�,.{ �
�w,�til 1 t s � � "� r, `1 �,�`! r+ l . -
�ti�+ � i "�". . - . } Y
�.,'ri.� „{, t .--�� 1+-�Y,;tiir` `T��a,� �—; '�� •i'� ' ' y�. '_ ' �� ..,i� .. . - -'„fJ I i '�.. •��,// �1�,-� .�^ -�� ,. :
�;�i' �.i'N�. �.�� '� .\ � •�'1"�� � ��. �. � . . '�f c + �f - ��•�'-:-�'-__�-�-,.if��.�y�.. _,+---r--�-�'�f`�! :'-+----- r .i e'_
<�: � ..'.,� ,:� . ` -� . .t F . _ � �� i 1 , . > _ _',�,-Y� �� -- , l'' .; ��� . ,�. . � -'Q��.tnE
�.\��%1 'Yi � '.I'� '`f� i`� g�, � � i' /� � �� tI '� �'!�s{ , il�- r,�`f'/F `,'l�f� ��, � � 1 f � �
.�'�' S .;�t. � � ��,'� �� �'� ryi} ,.� � , .. � :� '� ll� '-�.. � , - f i t' �li�� 8� �I..f�����i'"'�" J 14 f f ,L, Z .�..�
F �\ } ;�i > i ��,.7� .j � f w'L. - k � �. ';k,4 �����, u �'�!�: t�� t �i �' -} I
_
�.��, 'f_� � -r- �4�:i"�I Z-�`� .._«'I� — -� -!- i %r,,� ;* � �„ ` � �.i, � ��{ t . '� /
;{) 1 `Y i'�'R O S''� t�fJ,I I.,b-��� N� ,S .c.� �' �' ,��,:, �: .-.Q� r' � r „ ;, � �' � �, --.
; l �\' + F �.�� ��. � �'. � �� 'i �� ��;__ �^ �d � rt r��r( •j` C�YO �CPIa� �y �
, � � � . � q �,a F , t � � i �� '.l�' '� �� ,� m�? z t-., �;r��
� �F' t � , ^ ' � � ��:, r; S : �l ! ,� �\ _ � t 1�� • WRMF,Yail Yall�y
x ` `` '� � ' �-•,�-� q�� - ..-.' '} - '� � � { r� ' �-s� •
- - • . , ,
�l__ r ',t ' ' ', r3 �';, ,�'�� •. !y y�-,� l,f"'� F_,'� � �+ — �4��--.-- �--_ y C�n���P���liq
�; I��� �,.,,, �� { �, Z� ,� � ,,F� r � �1, �� ;� ��,�; '� T'�-_-r�s 'r�=� � �� � ��. � ti, �,��.` .. �
� ,� '� . . � 1 ? �! .i �:i -i i'� 1 , � �'�� . , �
� � .. . . �.� I� . , `-�u:'���'��' - �