HomeMy WebLinkAboutGSA Map Change Request - Buffehr Creek Lot 1 - Geotechnical Investigation 2012 � KOECHLE�N CONSIILTING ENGIN�ERS, YNC.
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS
(��//\+'�'�,��/j} Received
Tnl^l^I oC�f�ll/ ByLynneCampbellat11:49am,May03,2013
UVV�V if P IL
GEOTECHN�CAL INVESTIGATION I
PROPOSED WELTNER RESIDENCE
LOT 1
ELENI ZNEIMER SUBDIVISION
VAIL, COLORADO
O L/ /�
a�du•���`' !'
vo�f���q. �°.
.
� '� '�
, ,.
_,� �
1'�.,�7�23�IZ
�a�p�►
�
Prepared for:
Doug Weltner
CoIliers International
4520 Main Street, Suite 1000 �
Kansas City,MO 64111
Job No. 12-020 July 23, 2012
12364!1'est AlarlieAu Prlcwy.,st�,re rro,l.akert�ood, CO 80228(303)9�49-1223 �
i
1
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. I
7obNo.12-020 Co�asulting Geotechnicn7 Errgineers
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
SITE CONDITIONS 3
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 4
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS INVESTIGATION 5
IN VESTIGATION 5
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 6
RADON 7 �
MOLD 8
GROUND WATER 8
EXCAVATIONS 9
SHORING 9
FOLINDATIONS 10
FLOOR SLABS 12
FOUNDATION DRAINAGE 14
LATERAL WALL LOADS 14
RETAINING WALLS 15
SURFACE DRAINAGE 16
IRRIGATION 17
COMPACTED FILL 18
LIMITATIONS 19
VICINITY MAP Fig. 1
LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 3 �
LEGEND OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 4
GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figs. 5 and 6
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 7
TYPICAL WALL DRAIN DETAIL Fig. 8
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Table I �
i
i
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo.12-020 Cof:sirltirrg Geotechnical E�zgineers
SCOPE
This report is a revision of the report prepared for Job No. OS-166, dated October
5, 2005. The report was prepared for the previous owner of Lot 1. This report presents
the results of a geotechnical investigation for the proposed residence to be located on Lot
1 in the Eleni Zneimer Subdivision in Vail, Colorado. The approximate site location is
shown on the Vicinity Map, Fig. 1. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the
subsurface conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical recoinmendations for the �
proposed residence.
This repoi�t includes descriptions of subsurface soil, bedrocic, and ground water
conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and recommendations for foundation
systems, allowable bearing capacity, and design and construction criteria. This report was
prepared from data developed during our field and laboratory investigations and our
experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions in the area.
I
The recommendations presented in this report are based on the Scott S. �
Turnipseed, AIA Architectural Plans dated 5-17-12 and the Structural Plans dated 5-30- ���
12 prepared for the proposed residence. In addition, our recommendations are based on �
the residence being constructed on the lot at the location indicated on the Locations of
I
Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. A summary of our findings and conclusions is presented in
i
the following paragraphs. �
i
July 23,2012 ICOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Cor:sultirig Geolechnical Errgineers
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings varied
across the site. The subsurface conditions encountered in exploratory
boring TH-1 consisted of very dense, gravelly, clayey sand to a depth of
18.5 feet. Underlying the gravelly, clayey sand, to the maximum depth
explored of 23.0 feet, the subsurface conditions consisted of very hard �
sandstone bedrocic. Practical drill rig refusal in sandstone bedrocic was
encountered at a depth of 23.0 feet in boring TH-1. The subsurface
conditions encountered in exploratory borings TH-2 and TH-3 consisted of
approximately 1.0 foot of topsoil overlying stiff to hard, sandy, gravelly
clay to a depth of 22.0 feet in boring TH-2, and the maximum depth
explored of 14.0 feet in boring TH-3. Underlying the sandy, gravelly clay
in boring TH-2, to the maximum depth explored of 35.0 feet, the
subsurface conditions consisted of veiy dense, gravelly, clayey sand.
Practical drill rig refusal on sandstone bedrocic was encountered in
exploratory boring TH-3 at a depth of 14.0 feet. Laboratory test results
indicate that the natural, sandy, clay has low swell potential.
2. At the time of this investigation, no free ground water was encountered in
any of the exploratory borings to the maximum depth explored of 35.0
feet.
3. We anticipate that the subsurface conditions at the proposed foundation
elevation will consist of gravelly, clayey sand; sandy, gravelly clay; or
sandstone bedrock. In our opinion, the gravelly, clayey sand; sandy, �
gravelly clay; or sandstone bedrocic will support spread footings for the
proposed residence. However, if both soil and bedrocic are encountered
within the foundation excavations for the residence, special precautions
should be followed. Refer to the FOLJNDATIONS section of this report
for more details.
4. The subsurface conditions encountered at the proposed floor slab
elevations could consist of natural, gravelly, clayey sand; sandy, gravelly i
clay; or sandstone. In our opinion, slabs-on-grade may be constructed on
the natural, gravelly, clayey sand; sandy, gravelly clay; or sandstone with a
low rislc of movement. Refer to the FLOOR SLABS section of this report
for more details.
�
i
2 �
i
�
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 � Consultirtg Geotechnical Errgi�ieers
5. Open cuts and excavations require precautions as outlined in this report in
order to maintain the stability of slopes and sides of excavations. Refer to
the EXCAVATION section of this repoi�t for additional details.
6. Because cobbles and very hard sandstone were encountered at this site,
heavy-duty excavation equipment may be required to complete the
required excavations. If encountered, pockets of very hard sandstone may
require blasting or chiseling in order to complete the necessary
excavations. Refer to the EXCAVATIONS section of this report for
additional details.
7. Due to the anticipated depth of excavation along the north side of the
proposed residence, shoring of the excavation will be required. Refer to
the SHORING section of this report for additional details.
8. Drainage around the residence should be designed and constructed to
provide for rapid removal of surface runoff and avoid concentration of
water adjacent to foundation walls. Refer to the FOIJNDATION
DRAINAGE section of this report for additional details.
9. The potential for radon gas is a concern in the area. Building design
should include ventilation systems for below grade areas such as crawl
spaces and basements. Refer to the RADON section of this report for
additional details.
10. The potential for mold is a concern. We recommend that the contractor
and/or owner contact a professional Industrial Hygienist for specific �
recommendations on how to prevent and/or mitigate mold. Refer to the
MOLD section of this report for additional details.
SITE CONDITIONS
The proposed residence will be located on Lot 1 in the Eleni Zneimer Subdivision
in Vail, Colorado. Access to the lot will be from the east and a new driveway that will
branch off from Buffehr Creelc Road. At the time of the preparation of this repoi�t, the lot
3
i
�
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consulti�zg Geotecl�rrical Engirreers
was undeveloped. Vacant land borders the site to the north and east. Bordering the site
to the west is a residence on Lot 2, existing retaining walls, and the driveway used to
access Lots 2 through 6 of the same subdivision. Bordering the site to the south is
Buffehr Creelc Road. Topography of the lot slopes steeply down towards the south at an
approximate grade of 42 percent. Vegetation on the lot consists of grasses, weeds,
shrubs, and aspen trees.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Based on the plans prepared by Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA, a single family
residence with three levels will be constructed on the lot. The finished floor elevation for
the lower level will be 8282, main level will be 8295, and the upper level will be 8307. �
The proposed residence will be of wood frame construction with cast-in-place concrete
foundations and slab-on-grade floors. Portions of the residence will be constructed with
crawl spaces. The plans indicate that a two tiered boulder retaining wall will be
constructed on the north side of the proposed driveway and a single tiered boulder
retaining wall will be constructed on the south side of the proposed driveway. Boulder
retaining walls are also planned for the patio. In addition to the boulder retaining walls, a
soil nailed retaining wall, measuring approximately 130 feet in length, is planned north of
the proposed residence. The maximum height of the boulder retaining walls and soil
i
nailed retaining wall is 6 feet. We anticipate that excavations up to 30 feet may be (
4
July 23,2012 ICOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. ;
JobNo. 12-020 Consarlti�rg Geotechrtical Engi�reers �
required for construction of the proposed residence. In addition, cuts up to 6 feet and fills
up to 6 feet may be required for the construction of the driveway. Access to the proposed
residence will be from Buffehr Creek Road southeast of the proposed building site. A
proposed driveway is planned to extend from Buffehr Creelc Road to the proposed
residence. Maximum column and wall loads are assulned to be those normally associated
with residential structures.
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS INVESTIGATION
A geologic hazards investigation was outside the scope of this investigation.
Based on the plans Ai�t Mears,P.E., Inc evaluated geologic hazards for the Lot 1.
1NVESTIGATION
Subsurface conditions at this site were investigated on September 19, 2005 by
drilling three exploiatoiy borings with a four-inch diameter, continuous flight, solid stem �
power auger mounted on a traciced drill rig at the approximate locations shown on the
Locations of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. Initially, we planned to drill four exploratory
I
borings. However, due to the steep topography of the lot, and the presence of a large �
growth of Aspen trees, access to boring locations was extremely limited. This
investigation was conducted for the previous owner of Lot 1. ;
I
I
5 �
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consarlting Geotechnical Engineers
An engineer from our office was on the site to observe the drilling of the
exploratory borings and visually classify and document the subsurface soil, bedrocic and
ground water conditions. A description of the subsurface soils and bedrock observed in
the exploratory borings is shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 3; and on the
Legend of Exploratory Borings,Fig. 4.
Representative soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings were tested in
our laboratory in order to determine their natural moisture content, gradation propei�ties
and sweil-consolidation potential. The results of the laboratory tests are presented on the
Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 3; on the Gradation Test Results, Figs. 5 and 6; on the
Swell-Consolidation Test Results, Fig. 7; and on the Summary of Laboratory Test
Results, Table I.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings varied across �
the site. The subsurface conditions encountered in exploratory boring TH-1 consisted of
red-brown, dry to moist, very dense, gravelly, clayey sand with scattered cobbles to a
depth of 18.5 feet. Underlying the gravelly, clayey sand with scattered cobbles to the
maximum depth explored of 23A feet, the subsurface conditions consisted of red-brown,
dry, very hard sandstone bedrocic. Practical drill rig refusal in sandstone bedrock was
encountered at a depth of 23.0 feet in boring TH-1. The subsurface conditions (
6
i
I
i
I
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Coitsa�lti�zg Geotech�iical Errgineers �
(
encountered in exploratory borings TH-2 and TH-3 consisted of approximately 1.0 foot of
topsoil overlying red-brown, white, green, slightly moist to veiy moist, stiff to hard,
sandy, gravelly clay with scattered cobbles to a depth of 22.0 feet in boring TH-2 and the
maximum depth explored of 14.0 feet in boring TH-3. Practical drill rig refusal on
sandstone bedrocic was encountered at a depth of 14.0 feet in boring TH-3. Underlying
the sandy, gravelly clay with scattered cobbles in boring TH-2, to the maximum depth
explored of 35.0 feet, the subsurface conditions consisted of the red-brown, moist, very
dense gravelly, clayey sand with scattered cobbles. Laboratory test results indicated that
the sandy, gravelly clay has low swell potential.
I
At the time of this investigation, no free ground water was encountered in any of (
the exploratory borings to the maximum depth explored of 35.0 feet.
RADON �
In recent yeais, radon gas has become a concern. Radon gas is a colorless, I
odorless gas that is produced by the decay of minerals in soil and rock. The potential for �
radon gas in the subsurface strata of mountain terrain is likely. Since excavations for
lower levels in the residence are anticipated, we suggest that the building be designed
with ventilation for below grade areas.
� I
�
I
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consislting Ceotechnictrl Engirreers
MOLD
Mold tends to grow in areas that are darlc and damp, such as crawlspaces, below
grade areas, or bathrooms. Recommendations for mold prevention, mitigation, or
remediation are outside the scope of this investigation. We recommend that the
contractor and/or owner contact a professional Industrial Hygienist to provide specific
recommendations for the prevention and/or remediation of mold.
GROi1ND WATER
At the time of this investigation, no free ground water was encountered in any of
the exploratory borings to the maximum depth explored of 35.0 feet. Therefore, we do
not anticipate that ground water will affect construction of the proposed residence.
However, our investigation was performed during a dry time of the year. It is possible �
that ground water may be encountered during wetter times of the year. If ground water is
encountered within excavations for the proposed residence, the ground water can j
�
typically be controlled by shallow trenches on the outside of the foundation for the �
I
�
residence. The shallow trenches should be sloped down to a sump pit, where the water i
i
can be removed by pumping or to a gravity outlet. If ground water is encountered within i
the excavation for the residence, we must be contacted to provide speci�c
recommendations at that time.
I
s
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. l2-020 Coxsu/ti�ig Geotech�Jicnl Ertgineers
EXCAVATIONS
We anticipate that excavations up to 30 feet in depth may be required for
construction of the proposed residence. Because cobbles and very hard sandstone were
encountered in the exploratoiy borings, it is our opinion that heavy-duty construction
equipinent may be required to complete the necessary excavations at this site. The
sandstone bedrock may require chiseling or blasting to complete the necessary
excavations.
Care needs to be exercised during construction so that the excavation slopes
remain stable. The subsurface soils, which consisted of the gravelly, clayey sand and
sandy, gravelly clay, classify as Type B soils in accordance with OSHA regulations.
Weathered sandstone classifies as Type A soils in accordance with OSHA regulations.
Hard sandstone classifies as Stable Rock in accordance with OSHA regulations. OSHA
regiilations should be followed in all excavations and cuts.
SHORING
Due to the anticipated depth of excavation along the noi-th side of the proposed
residence, shoring of the excavation will be required. We recommend a contractor
specializing in shoring be contacted for design recommendations and construction of the
�
shoring.
9
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consirlting Geotechriicnl Er:gineers
FOUNDATIONS
The subsurface conditions at the proposed foundation elevations may consist of
the gravelly, clayey sand, sandy, gravelly clay, or sandstone bedrocic. We anticipate that
sandstone bedrocic could be encountered in the north side of the excavation for the
residence. Because the bedrocic is very hard and unyielding, spread footings consh�ucted
on a combination of soil and bedrocic could experience differential movement of
approximately 1 to 2 inches. In order to reduce the rislc of differential movement between
spread footing elements, special design and construction techniques could be used.
One technique that could be used to reduce the rislc of differential movement is to
design the foundation using varying maximum allowable bearing pressures. Another
alternative is to overexcavate the bedrocic and soils below the proposed foundation and
construct a geosynthetic-reinforced structural fill below the entire building footprint. The
�
foundation may then be designed using a uniform maximum allowable bearing pressure.
While this technique does not eliminate the risk of differential movement, it will reduce �
the amount of differential movement if it occurs.
If the owner is not willing to accept the rislc of differential movement between the
foundation elements, then the foundation system should be constructed entirely on the
sandstone bedrocic or on a deep foundation system. If the owner chooses to support the
proposed residence on a deep foundation system, we should be contacted for additional
recommendations.
10 I
�
I
i
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Cor:sirlting Geotecl7r:ical Er�gineers
�
If the owner is willing to accept the rislc of differential movement, then the '
foundation may be consttucted on a combination of natural soils and bedrock. We
recommend the following design and construction criteria for foundations bearing on a
combination of natural soils and bedrock.
1. Footings may be supported by the natural, gravelly, clayey sand; sandy,
gravelly clay; sandstone bedrocl<; or properly moisture conditioned and
compacted structural fill, as described below in Items 3, 4, 6, 9, and 10.
2. Spread footings constructed on the gravelly, clayey sand or sandy, gravelly
clay may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000
psf. Spread footings constructed on the sandstone bedrocic may be
designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 6,000 psf.
3. As an alternative to constructing the foundation directly on the natural
soils and bedrocic, if the owner chooses to fui�ther reduce the effect of I
differential movement on the foundation elements, the natural soils and
bedrocic may be overexcavated a minimum of 2.0 feet and replaced with a
properly moisture conditioned and compacted structural fill with a
geotextile reinforcement at the base over the entire excavation. The
geotextile reinforcement may consist of Tensar BX1100, Tensar BX1200
or equivalent. Spread footings may then be constructed on the reinforced
structural fill. Spread footings constructed on a uniform layer of structural
fill may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 �
psf.
4. If structural fill is placed below the proposed foundation, we recommend
that a uniform thickness of fill be placed beneath all foundation elements.
The structural fill should be moisture treated and compacted as
recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this report.
5. Wall footings and foundation walls should be designed to span a distance
of at least 10 feet in order to account for anomalies in the soil or fill.
6. Foundation wall backfill should not be considered for support of load
bearing footings. Footings should be stepped and supported by
undisturbed natural soils and should not be constructed on foundation wall
11
I
�
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consulti��g Geoteclr�:ical Eirgineers
backfill. Foundation walls or grade beams should be designed to span
across an excavation backfill zone and should not be constructed with
footings within this zone.
7. The base of the exterior footings should be established at a minimum
depth below the final exterior ground surface, as required by the local
building code. We believe that the depth for frost protection in the local
building code in this area is 4.0 feet.
8. Column footings should have a minimum dimension of 24 inches square
and continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches.
Footing widths may be greater to accommodate structural design loads.
9. We anticipate that cobbles could be encountered at the foundation
elevation. Removal of the cobbles may result in depressions and rough G
bottoms in the excavation. The resulting depressions can be backfilled
with compacted backfill or lean concrete.
10. Fill should be placed and compacted as outlined in the COMPACTED
FILL section of this report. We recominend that a representative of a
professional geotechnical engineer observe and test the placement and
compaction of structural fill used in foundation construction. It has been
our experience that without engineering quality control, poor construction
techniques can occur which result in poor foundation performance.
ll. A representative of our office must observe the completed foundation
excavation. Variations from the conditions described in this report, which (
were not indicated by our borings, can occur. The representative can
observe the excavation to evaluate the exposed subsurface conditions.
�
FLOOR SLABS
We anticipate that the residence will be constructed with slabs-on-grade. The �
subsurface materials at the floor slab elevations could consist of the natural, gravelly,
clayey sand; sandy, gravelly clay; or sandstone. In our opinion the natural, gravelly,
12
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Co�rsulting Geotec/rnicnl Engineers
clayey sand; sandy, gravelly clay; or sandstone will support slabs-on-grade with a low rislc
of movement. We recommend the following precautions for the construction of slab-on-
grade floors at this site:
1. Slabs may be placed on the natural, gravelly, clayey sand; sandy, gravelly
clay; sandstone; or properly moisture conditioned and compacted structural
fill. Control joints should be constructed at locations where support of
slabs change from soil to sandstone to reduce cracicing in the slabs due to
differential movement of the slabs.
2. We anticipate that cobbles could be encountered at the floor slab
elevations. The removal of cobbles or excavation of sandstone may result
in depressions and rough bottoms in the excavation. A crushed rocic �11
may be placed and compacted beneath the slabs-on-grade to fill in
depressions and act as a leveling course for the slabs.
3. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members. Vertical movement of the slab should not be restricted.
4. Exterior slabs should be separated from the building. These slabs should
be reinforced to function as independent units. Movement of these slabs
should not be transmitted directly to the foundations or walls of the
structures.
5. Frequent control joints should be provided in all slabs to reduce problems
associated with shrinlcage of concrete.
�
6. Fill beneath slabs-on-grade may consist of on-site soils free of deleterious '
material or approved fill. Crlished rocic fill should be used where slabs are
supported by sandstone. Fill should be placed and compacted as
recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this report. Placement
and compaction of fill beneath slabs should be observed and tested by a
representative of a professional geotechnical engineer. �
13 �
�
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSI7LTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consulting Geotechrtical Engineers
I
FOUNDATION DRAINAGE
Surface water, especially that originating from snowmelt, tends to flow through
relatively permeable backfill typically found adjacent to foundations. The water that
flows through the fill collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils or bedrocic
occurring at the foundation elevation. Both this surface water and possible ground water
can cause wet or moist below grade conditions after construction.
We recommend the installation of a drain along the below grade foundation walls.
The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe encased in free draining
gravel and a manufactured wall drain. The drain should be sloped so that water flows to a
sump where the water can be removed by pumping, or to a positive gravity outlet.
Recommended details for a typical foundation wall drain are presented in the Typical
Wall Drain Detail,Fig. 8.
LATERAL WALL LOADS
The proposed below grade walls will reguire lateral earth pressures for design. �
I
Lateral earth pressures depend on the type of bacicfill and the height and type of wall. '
Walls, which are free to rotate sufficiently to mobilize the strength of the bacicfill, should
be designed to resist the "active" eai�th pressure condition. Walls, which are restrained,
should be designed to resist the "at rest" earth pressure condition. Below grade walls are
typically restrained. The following table presents the lateral wall pressures that may be
�
14
�
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consulting Geolec/n:ica! Errgirreers
assumed for design.
Earth Pressure Condition Equivalent Fluid Pressurel
(pc�
Active 35
At-rest 50
Passive 300
Notes:
1. Equivalent fluid pressures are for a horizontal backfill condition with no hydrostatic
pressures or live loads.
2. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 may be used at the base of footings to resist lateral
loads.
Bacicfill placed behind or adjacent to foundation walls and retaining walis should
be placed and compacted as recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this
report. Placement and compaction of the fill must be observed and tested by a
representative of a professional geotechnical engineer.
I
�
RETAINING WALLS
Based on the site plan provided by Scott S. Turnipseed, AIA, boulder retaining
walls will be constructed on the north and south sides of the proposed driveway and on
the south side of the patio. Also a soil nail retaining wall will conshucted north of the �
i
proposed residence. The retaining walls will vary in height froin approximately 2 to 6
feet. The retaining walls shown on the plans have been designed by a professional
Engineer.
i
i
�
15
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. i
JobNo. 12-020 Corrsulting Geoteclinic�rl Erigineers
Foundations for retaining walls may be designed and constructed as outlined in
the FOUNDATIONS section of this report. Lateral earth loads for retaining wall designs
are presented in the LATERAL WALL LOADS section of this report. In order to reduce
the possibility of developing hydrostatic pressures behind retaining walls, a drain should
be constructed adjacent to the wall. The drain may consist of a manufactured drain i
system and gravel. The gravel should have a maximum size of 1.5 inches and have a
maximum of 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Washed concrete aggregate or
screened crushed rocic will be satisfactory for the drainage layer. The manufactured drain
should extend from the bottom of the retaining wall to within 2 feet of subgrade
elevation. The water can be drained by a perforated pipe with collection of the water at
the bottom of the wall leading to a positive gravity outlet.
�
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Reducing the wetting of structural soils and the potential of developing
hydrostatic pressure behind below grade walls can be achieved by carefully planned and
maintained surface drainage. We recommend the following precautions be observed
during construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed:
1. Wetting or drying of the open excavation should be minimized during
construction.
2. All surface water should be directed away from the top and sides of the
excavation during construction.
16
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Consultirtg Geotechnical Engirreers
3. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be
sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We recommend
a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet.
4. Hardscape (concrete and asphalt) should be sloped to drain away from the
residence. We recommend a slope of at least 2 percent for all hardscape
within 10 feet of the residence.
5. Roof drains should discharge at least 10 feet away from foundation walls
with drainage directed away from the residence.
6. Backfill, especially around foundation walls, should be placed and
compacted as recommended in the COMPACTED FILL section of this
report.
7. Surface drainage for this site should be designed by a Professional Civil
Engineer.
IRRIGATION
Irrigation systems installed next to foundation walls, retaining walls, or sidewallcs
could cause consolidation of bacicfill below and adjacent to these areas. This can result in
settling of exterior steps, patios and/or sidewallcs over bacicfilled areas. We recommend
the following precautions be followed:
1. Do not install an irrigation system next to foundation walls or above retaining
walls. The irrigation system should be at least 10 feet away from the residence or
face of retaining walls.
2. Irrigation heads should be pointed away from the structure or in a manner that
does not allow the spray to come within 5 feet of the residence or face of
retaining walls. �
3. The landscape around the irrigation system should be sloped so that no ponding
occurs at the irrigation heads.
17
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Corrsulting Geoteclr�rical Engineers
4. Install landscaping geotextile fabrics to inhibit growth of weeds and to allow
normal moisture evaporation. We do not recommend the use of a plastic
membrane to inhibit the growth of weeds.
5. Control valve boxes for automatic irrigation systems should be at least 10 feet
away from the structure and periodically checked for lealcs and flooding.
(
COMPACTED FII,L
Structural fill for this project may consist of the on-site gravelly, clayey sand;
sandy, gravelly clay; or approved imported granular fill. The imported fill may consist of
non-expansive silty or clayey sands or gravels with up to 30 percent passing the No. 200
sieve and a maximum plasticity index of 10 or crushed rock. No cobbles, boulders or
sandstone fragments larger than 6 inches should be placed in fill areas. Fill areas should
be stripped of all vegetation and topsoil, scarified, and then compacted. Topsoil may be
used in landscape areas. Fill should be placed in thin loose lifts then moisture treated and
compacted as shown in the following table. The recommended compaction varies for the
given use of the fill.
i
i
�
18 �
i
July 23,2012 KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
JobNo. 12-020 Cortstt/fing Geotecltrtical Eirgirteers
Recommended Compaction
Percentage of the Standard Percentage of the Modified
Use of Fill Proctor Maximum Dry Density Proctor Maximum Dry Density
(ASTM D-698) (ASTM D-1557)
Below Structure Foundations 98 95
Below Slabs-On-Grade 95 90
Retaining Wall Bacicfill 95 90
Utility Trench Bacicfill 95 90
Bacicfill (Non-Structural) 90 90
Notes:
1. For clay soils the moisture content should be 0 to+3 percent of the optimum moisture content.
2. For granular soils the moisture content should be—2 to+2 of the o timum moisture content.
We recommend that a representative from our office observe and test the
placeinent and compaction of each lift placed for structural fill. Fill placed below
foundations, behind retaining walls, or below slabs-on-grade is considered structuraL It
has been our experience that without engineering quality control, inappropriate
�
construction techniques can occur which result in poor foundation and slab performance.
LIMITATIONS
I
Although the exploratory borings were located to obtain a reasonably accurate �'
determination of subsurface conditions, variations in the subsurface conditions are always
possible. Any variations that exist beneath the site generally become evident during
excavation for the structure. Therefore, we must be contacted by the contractor and/or
owner so that a representative of our office can observe the completed excavations to
19
�
i
�
�
July23,2012 KOECNLEINCONSULTINGENCrNEEl2S,INC. �
JobNo. l2-020 Consrrlting Geotec/rrrrcaJ Engi►�eers
confirm that the exposed subsurface coz�ditions are as indicated by the exploratary
borings, and to verify our foundatian and floor slab reeommendations.
Tl�e placernent and compaction of fill, as well as installation o� foundations,
should also be observed and tested. The prelimiYiary design criteria and subsur�'ace data
presented zn this report are valid for 3 years froin the date of this repart provrded that a
representative fro� our office observes the s�te at that time and confirms that the site
conditions are similar to the conditions presented iiz the SITE CONDTTTONS sectzon of
this report and that the recommendations presented in this report are still applicable.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If we can be of further
assistanee in discussing the contents of this report or in analyses of the proposed structure
from a soils and foundation viewpoint,please contact our of£'iee.
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
�'4'•°•' r� „��-�---, i
o...• •�.
� ,,: . � �
, ��� � i
_�
-��23-12�
...
°«.......••
Willianl H. oechlein,P.E.
President
(1 eleeh�onic copy sent to architect)
(1 paper copy sent to architect and owner)
20
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, WC. �
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
A �
� ��..
�, `
,, ���`'
� �,�
�_ I ��
�� � �
�t {°
�i.. � ' � . -- �
''� A :°� �-
;s �,��' �� �-- °��,��
,,� ��{��� "�'--
� t-,
�� �. �1cAQ a�,,;�{J`' : r��
� � � � � „��� �
'' ��:o ,��� �:
��
�,,' .,.�" ;.'— —
ti"�-' ,r`
�; �¢��i
�' �,',�� ��
� F
���� :
�.�.r ,�go���'�-��
q ���, ��gr� ��
�� .
�� ��. �
�,�.� r �r�,a
.�� ���. `� ��s
� fI >y�:
'�'` ..
SITE
I
,
�
NOT TO SCALE
�,,
VICIfVITY MAP
JOB NO.12-020 FIG.1
N
/� �
�� LL
� i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i � � 'I i i°�' i ioi �o '� � .1
� j j I I I I 1 j I � I � j I I I j I I 1 � �� � / j � � � �j � I �'°� �� z Ii
� I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 � � I I I I I I
� j � I>�/ I I j I I �__Y �
� �I I � �f � � � �ol� � � ° I k�� � �m � p
I Cm §I I �
q � Gt �`'- S� `�o'i i � ? ( � i i 6 � � � 1 ui c
i
c 3n � , �, i: �� � i i� i � r i i I o
a � y f e � d � I I I I � I „I II � I I � I � O
4� �' a � t . ''�� 1. -.5� � j j I I'I I � �1 r I I I I � I � 1 V y
! s� g e ,' �t i � � i i �i i � � � i r � � � o
i i i
� ���i 1� ��r�r. � °�-� �� e r� ��� � � i i � i � � � i j � t`�i� � � i� � �� A
�'I �.� � ` ��� $��� � f,. � i i i i i� i ' �� i 'i � �� a
S � I I � � i � . 1 M� C
i � II � _ � x; � a� ' , � i i i �� i i �t r � ��.k � �� rn�n�+ �
i si :;y 7 P r � F°�y i s�i"'�' i i i i i o�i i i i; i �1 \ � 3� n �
i : L ,� � �� �� �e�s'� �t � i i i i i�6 i ''1�� '���' �a � \
i = �� � s �s �e 81a+ ayu� i i i i i �� i ' `;� r,r � a a m
I � M N
I I _I f �3 � � 5tIF• Y I I I I I � � i � "F .,4 1 I 1 z \ \ �d C a N �G
� �� � �� �� �l��q �i i i i i j� i i `, � z��i i � � �� \ .°o¢ � ,°o
�
_ � s�i �,i p� i i i i \� i � i � \ \ i � �
.� P nm I I I I I j � j ' �1�� 1 I � D � N�Y Z'
I w �
d__
� a�� {�O i i � i i i � i .e i i �" \ i \ A E x o
i ...s_,_ .,..,e,.a �., i"� i i i i ' j '� �� ��ee� i��` \ ' m a.x �«
i i i i i i i i i i � � � .i N i � � i�� i i � � i i i � � ' { � � �°_�� ,� ` '��' � ' � a a
i � � i � i i i i � i � i � � i i i � i i � i i i i ' i Jl i � i"i � \ yO10 x
� � �i i m i i i i � i � i � � i i i i i i i i i i �b i � i �, �. i � �� �� e,o,� � \ v u.�¢ � m
� i i i i i i i i i i � i i � i i i i i i i i i .€ i i� i si i i i v,; � o� N M
i � i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i � E:,y� i � i\ �\ ��s� � \ s z
� � � I � I I I 1 � I � 1 � � I I I � I I � � 1 I ��� � j: [ 1 \ \ \ 6 �
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i `s�3 i i f � � � ���, � \
i i � i i i i i i i i � i i i i i i i i � i , �
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i � i i i � i o� � , � \ �� �� " � �
i i i i � i i i i i � i � i i � � i � i i � i i i -i �i � � F i_ � � � � ���` \ �� �`��a 4 'n
i i i i i i i i i i i i i � i i i i i i �i i y � �� �� �� �� "�- � `�``� V
i i i i i i i i i i � i i i i i i i i i i i i \ �,v
i i i i � i i i �i �i i i � i � �i � i i i i i i i i i i i ' � i } \ �\ �` �` � \ \ �� �
i i i i i i i i i � i � i � i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i � s '�� . �� �� �� �� �� � � \ �\ �`'�'
� j j I j II I I I � IF 1 j�4'j I I � � � � � � � 1 I j j 1 1� \,�� �� �� \ � � ' �
; , , � , � � � � �, �g � Z�,�;� � i '� I { � � I I ' ' � � Y� � � ♦. \ \ 1 �\ `� M1� `\
� i j i �i i i �i i � ia � W���i � i i � i i i i � i� � s ti,. �,� � � � � .� � \
� � i � � s i.I � � \ o
� I I I I I � � �� I � �
i i � i i i i i i ii w a 3�� �i �i � � � �p� ��€1� �� ` \ \ ��t°� �, °�`\ �`` �\ �` `\ ` , \ \\ k.
i i i i i i i i o � go� i i i 1 i � s � � � � � � � . M
i i i i i i i i i � � � i�i i � i i � u '� � � � � i� � �� A � � � � e -�—��� � W
i i � i i �i i �i i i wii io i � i � � � �p � � � \ \ � V �� � i '�§ \ � � � ` � � � 1 \ �
i i � i i i i i i i � i �m� i � � � � ° �� �� ��. � �� � c t , � � � � � � o A � � �
i i i i i i i i i i i � i � � �` ` � \ � � � \ � � ` �i t�: �� � ` � � � � � � � \ I.L
i i i i i i i i i i � i � � � � & '� � ', i � ��\ \ � < � � � \ \ � � � \
i �i i i j �i i i i � �i �i �i ��� � �� � a ' � '� i� � �� �.� `� �� i�s �� �� �� � �` ��� � �
I i � i � i i i � i � �i i �i � i .` � � � ; �\ �� �'� � � �\ ���`� `� n \ \ \ �� O
� i � i i i i i i � i i i � o-� i � � J � � � ;�� �� `� � � � � � � �: L
'i i i �i i i i i w�ii � i � � ° o�� �� ' �� �� � ' �' `; �� �„`' � �1�` �� ��` � ��`� ���� ��.� \
i i i i i i i i �^<i i i �� � � '� .����,�I . V .` ` �i'y� � a i ��i � ��� � �`� � �� � � �'��� Q�/
i i � i i i i i s�i i �i f � '� >� �� i ; i� i �� .� � \ � � \ �� �� \ � \
i i i i � i i i i ��I I 1II �i �\ ; `� � a �� ; `� `� ` �� '� ` � " � I.I
i i i ' i i i � � � � � �
� II I I I ��' �I 1 1 '1 �' 1 � I I I I .I I ���I� Y 1` 'F �� �� \, � \I �, �`� 1, 1` O
� � � �I � I I II �g � � � } E,. i' �I��i ,� i.. < � i `i � �� \ �
i i i i i i �� �i �� i i � �i � � � i I ���� � � � c� � E�°� i i ���� i � � � i � , A �.�� '�� �
� � � I � I I 1 � � a � \ �t II � �<� S 1 .y 1 1 s� I \ 1 1 1 ��
i i � i i i i � i � � ; i � ��� ��� I � ��� � " f ' : � -� � ��� � � � � � � . � \ ��� a sJ
i i i � i i � i i i ` � � i � �� Q C t /5 � ^� i<s,i n � � � i i �� � U�S�� I
� � � I I 1 I I � I 1 I `� \1 I I�I�I I I � II I I � y� 3 1 id� �� ��pg;� �� �� 1 1 1 � \ �` ''�" ��
� � � I I 1 I 1 � I - 1 \ 1 � I I � 1 � $i't;a 1 A i � i i � i --�_�oq\ i
� i � i � i � � i � I � � �� ��j � ��, �� i i°8 i i i � � � � � '�a o� i �,/
i i � i � i i i � i i I � �f� � m ;i c � ��° i i i � � � � � \ i /\
i i � i i i i i i �� m � � I�I � � 'ii 1 , ,� s � , � i i i � i � � � � � 'N i W
i il il � i ii � i i1 i i � i III � I., , �� I . �� �. �� f I i `��.r� i.. � � i i i i �i i �1 � � �` \ i
� �� � �i � � ,� I I �� � 6 t � i V i i i \i � � t � � '� ��� ��
� �� �� 1 �� 1 �� 1 �� 1 1 � � I II.�. t,II. II � � I I�� �2 i �; 1. I � I ` 1 1 1 1 1 ♦
� � ' � � � � � � 11 , I 1 } t 1 1 I1 \ \ \♦
i � i i i o� � � ��,-� I i;� il� � , I� �I �: � 4 }. � � i � i i� i �i �� � �i i .� \ �� \ �
i i � i i i W� i � � � i� � i. � � F ,� � ., i i i i i � � i i i � \ �,.
� � � �� � , ����� , � �� � ,��,�� +� ���1 , ,�; , �� ' a � � �w � � , � � � �, �.� �
i 'i '� i �i i vg i �i � ! � i �1 i i= i i i i � i _-�-- \
I I I � I I' �� �illl a r � � a tt :.� � i
'� i i-� i (� � i.�� dll � ' � ' � l; , a� � i i i' i i i i i A
� � i i �i �i i i � � � � i � I , IIII� I i : �' � z � i i ��i i i � i i � � � //q
i � � i i � � � � � ��� � � � � � � i i '� I� i1, � A.i t ., j i i gi i � i i � � � V/
i �i �i �� � �i i � �� � � � �u � I' � i � �I , ��l } x�.{; � �,� i i i i i i i i A \
� � i i � � � � � ' I� �(; ��i ��i� �- I �;� \i i i 6� i i i i �i \ � �
i � i � i i � ��. a* o i i i i i i i \
,, � � , ,, � , � , � �a� � � .�4 ,1�� � � li:�� � �� � i ���� �,�� , :� � ,. �� � � ;� � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � ; � � � � � � , � � � � , � , �, ��, �
i i �i �i ,F, i i i i i i i ' � I ,'� q° ` � �� � � i i i i � � i i�� �� � A
� ' i i � �1 i i i i i i ��d i < 'sl�, II ,I II ��I I I � � i i i i i i i . �
� � i i F+ X i i i i i � ,� � F �i. � i i� i i i i i i i � -�—�' � I
� i T i i i � i � � � � �I � ' � �,, i i i i i I i i i i '� �
1 1 � I� j Q Q 1 I I 1 I , I I 1 I l) .'il � ' � � I � I I I � I 1 I i (.
i i � i i ..i .i i i i i i i s �� � �I N � . I I �ls� '` i i i i i � i i i i i � �� � I
� � � � a�S � � � � � .� , � �4 f � �� � , � � � � r1
�I I � I�� I�� I �{7� I I 1 � � I � I 1 I � � \I I I I ill� III I .�II I I I`'•� q} ,� 20 � 1 1 1 � j I I I �I � 1 � V
i i i � . i � I �.�i� e � � i i i � i � h �
�i i � �i i i i i i i �i � � � i i � � '�y � I ,I���� I �I� I � �� > � r i i � � �i i i i � i. e m
�i �i i � � �i � �i i i i � � �i i i ' � i i. � ' � � �,''^'��+ � i i i �i i i � i i i i ` � 1
i i i i i � � i � � � i i i i i i i o
'; '�, �, '� 1 I, { �, '�, ; �� { � p� I , { j I ; ' �' � ����� '�� �% � f I I � l f l; 1 ; I �, -�-�._!
i i i i i � � i i i i i , � , � i � i�' � ��=J i i i i i � i i i i i � � 1
i i i i i i i i i i i m °i , , I i I� i 9, i i i i i i � i 1i i i �
i i i 'i 'i i 'i i i i i i � �r` � ' ' �i �`r , �i( � ) �i �' i i i i 1 i i i i i � i � � l
�i �i �� i i �� � �i i i i i � ` i i i i � i I� i i ,J i i i i � i i � � i i �
� � , � � i � ��� L� Y � � � � � � � 1� � � � � � � � I
i i i i � � i i i i i � , , i i i i i , i i i i i i � � i � , , �
i i i i i i i �i , � i i i a io,'•• i i i i i i i 1� i i n i � � I
'i ��i �i i �� �� �i �� �i �i �i ��i �i � i ^ �' ! ' i i i ' �i� i¢ ' � �i � i i� � i i i � � ,
i i i � �i �i i �i i i i i i � i �� �i ', � i i 'i , f i �a ' � i i i i i� i i� i� m i m � �
i i i � i i i i i i i i � i i i i� � i i i � i i � I i i i3 i �> � i � I
�i �i �i �i { �i �i �i �i �i �i �� �� �i �i i i o ' ', � �i 'i '� �i `� i � � � i i i z='il i g;� � i ia �
i i i � i i i i i i i i � i i i � ' � � ' '��' '� i i ' i i ia�il i $w°' i� I �
� , � � � � � � m��� � � , �
I' .- � � �, � � � � ;� ,
� �i r :� .�, �s�'- � 2 &�c ��i ' $ �, �i . i ���� � i �� � i i i i $ ..� i � �
- ����� `,rc, ?. F 9� Q �� � s $ � � i � � � a � � i I i i i"&' � I �
_� � . � � � 3 ° 'i i � i i i i i '�h� �i�' � i 'i i ' ' '
. ,
� i �t� I I 1� �� �� � � j 70'� � I I ��m j � � �
-� � � �y a s ��� a � y Z� �i �i ��i � i �i � � � �i i �� ii � i �i � � � � �
- � f i �� i � i i i i � i � i i -
I � � I i � �i .� i i I s m i i i i � i i i / s�, ' I�
i i Wa � i i i i c .
i � ��, �i 3 Qi i i i i e i i i i i � � i i � � ° �
i i i i i i i i i i i
'�� 5�i�'��,> �,Y/ °� r�a ,f i i i I i o � i i i i i i i i i i i i / I
3. 4, � � � i i i i i � i � i i i � i i i .
�l� t'_'`�� (k � i�,i � i i � i ` � i � i i i i � � i i ; � � �` I
� j � "s� " �� i�;�E � i i ! i ,' i �i �i i i �i �i i �i � � �i m ' �, � � I
� . ` ,� �� > , I
��''�` � i i � i � � � � i � i t � � � �, � ; � , % i i° ,
� �.�� � „ � , � � � � , , , � � � � , � � � � i
�.x_�,n,,.»....��_..�,_..m=._., m , , �� � I '� I � � ' � 1 I '� � � ; � � �
� � ,L � i � i i i i � i i i i `' i i �i �i i i �i i i i � -r Jre�s�Ln�'T"', — 3 f N �
—'�'�'T'+ i +'r�-'r�-.r...l.�...r-++.+. i i i y i�r rb�' � i i O
I I I � I I I j I I I � � I I I I la-T'�.a�q�as._�s'�"' I �'?% � � `../ '� '� I j i i i i I
ny�u ,{�,
I I I � I I � I I I I � � j I I I I � � j � � I � I �/ � �L+' � � j � � � 3 � N
I I I � I I I I I I I I � j I I I I � � i � I � I � � 1 j I I � I � � � I
_+ i i i i � i i � � r' �- �
I �iTi'�1�_T�,_,i�l-y J—,._I�,�1.a_�.T_j.-j.—r� L�_1�{�LeJia�v<�� � ��� i I °� n�a Z
T�
� ! ! � i i i � i � � � Q' i i i i � i i a s—'���' �I �� � �l m� � s� s� m �I � I i �gu�o� �II
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Consuiting Geotechnical Engineers
�
TH-1 '
APP.EL. 8284
8285 8285
�o,a;
a°d�
��' TH-2
oaca
q�� APP.EL. 8279
8280 bq°�' TH-3 8280
0 0..
•o�� 30/12 APP.EL. 8277
0 0:
�:b: y,�:�':
�a� �.�.�.
i�t3: . . .
Q•Q Y:!:!:
��y� y.y.�.
1y S�: !:C:!: . . .
p.4. �;r;�; 'l:i':!:
8275 b�a �:;r:!: ��y��� 8275
�Y3:. �,r:�: 18/12 �;y.�.
• D;d; i,y.i: •l:,r;i.
�� 34/12 �.,,:,; r,.;,.
o Y3: WC=4 �;,r;i. �::r:i,.
o:a �:y::. �:r:<• 10/12
s�acz DD=115 �,y,,. �:r;;.
sys�: -200=17 �;r;i. �:.r:i�
ap• �,y,�. �:z:i'
ba� i:z:i• i
oC3_; �'y''� �:z:�• I
�:r:�� 8270
o•G• i:'r:L•
� 'o�a ��'�'' 18/12 �:�:�•
�C3�' �:.r:i• 'r:x:�•
a 38/12 �:�:'•
D:CCS� %:,'l:l.'
l:�:l.'
CS.�j %:,(:7.'
L�i3' W�i='4 I:�:l,' %:.(:!'
06� DD=126 ;:�:;: .:,�:,� 51/12
q�: i:x:�. •r.�:�•
-200=14 •r.x:�•
�, Pa. ,:�:�� >:.�:y� m
W b�"a .:�:�• �.>:3• r
.:x:z• �:>::� 8265 �
� 8265 �:�:j•
,:�:�• 16/12 >:.�:��
•r:,•r:�• WC=17 i:.�:�' D
ZO 50/3 %,�:�• �:�':�•
,;,:�• DD=113 %����' —�
%:>:%' -200=72 Q
�- r:,�:i.•
Q i:i:i.' �
� i:i:�' TI
%:l:�'t'
J '.':'`� m
W 8260 ;;;:F� 19/12 8260 �
�:�:;�:
�:�:;�:
;�:�:;�:
�,�:;�:
:��>�;��
Sy i`�:
bqsJ
8255 bb�• 8255 i
o• 19/12 r`
•oaz�
o C3:� WC=7
�a� DD=125
*�� -200=31
pd�
��:
bq4
8250 �� 8250
Q�:
�°a
y�:
I
�.p.
O�'S�j
GQ•
..p:p.
'O'`y�
8245 �Q� 8245
aa: 35/12
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
JOB N0.12-020 FIG.3
i
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
LEG�ND:
p Q:: SAND, Gravelly, Clayey, Scattered cobbles, Dry to
� a°� moist,Very dense, Red-brown.
SANDSTONE, Dry,Very Hard, Red-brown.
� TOPSOIL
'���'� CLAY, Sandy, Gravelly, Scattered cobbles, Slightly
r:z:�•
�����' moist to very moist, Stiff to hard, Red-brown, White,
Green.
T REFUSAL. indicates practical drill rig refusal in
sandstone bedrock.
a CALIFORNIA DRIVE SAMPLE. The symbol 30/12
indicates that 30 blows of a 140 pound hammer
falling 30 inches were required to drive a 2.5 inch
O.D. sampler 12 inches.
I
Notes:
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on September 19, 2005 using a 4-inch diameter auger mounted on a tracked drill rig.
2. No free ground water was encountered at the time of drilling in any of the exploratory borings to the maximum depth
explored of 35.0 feet.
3. The Boring Logs are subject to the explanations, limitations, and conclusions as contained in this report.
4. Laboratory Test Results:
WC- Indicates natural moisture (%)
DD- Indicates dry density(pcfl
-200- Indicates percent passing the No. 200 sieve (%)
5.Approximate elevations are based on the topographic site plan provided by the Architect.
LEGEND OF EXPLORATORY ORINGS
JOB N0.12-020 FIG.4
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
,� �
gp 10
gp 20
70 � -p
Z �1
c�n 60 40 m
¢ �
� � � �
z �
w
� 40 60 z
a � �o °
20 �
10 �
p 100
� �� �� DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MM o.� o.o� o.00i
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY
Sample of SAND,Gravelly,Clayey GRAVEL 28 % SAND 55 %
Source TH-1 Sample No. EIev./Depth 10.0 feet SILT&CLAY 17 % LIQUD LIMIT %
PLASTICITY INDEX %
100 �
gp 10
gp 20
70 '� -p
c7 m
Z �1
� � � z I
a --i
z � � m f
w --�
� 40 60 z
w m
a � �o °
zo �
10 �
p 100
200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
DIAMEfER OF PARTICLE IN MM
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY
Sample of SAND,Gravelly,Clayey GRAVEL 36 % SAND 50 °/a
Source TH-1 Sample No. Elev./Depth 15.0 feet SILT&CLAY 14 % LIQUID LIMIT %
PLASTICITY INDEX %
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
Job No. 12-020 FIG.5 '
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
100 �
gp 10
g� 20
70 '� '0
C7 m
z �
� � a° m
Q z
�
� � � �
z �
� 40 60 z
°- � �o °
20 �
to �
Q 100
200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
DIAMEfER OF PP,RTICLE IN MM
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY
Sample of CLAY,Sandy GRAVEL 1 °/a SAND 27 %
Source TH-2 Sample No. EIev./Depth 14A feet SILT&CLAY 72 °/a LIQUD LIMIT %
PLASTICITY INDEX %
�� o
y� 10
� 20
70 � -p
Z ,'Cm1
� � aom
Q Z I
a --i
F- 50 5° �
w �
� 40 60 z
w m
°' � �o °
� �
�o � �
i
o �� �
200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
DIAMEfER OF PARTICLE IN MM
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY
Sample of SAND,Clayey GRAVEL 9 % SAND 60 %
Source TH-2 Sample No. EIev.IDepth 24.0 feet SILT&CLAY 31 % LIQUID LIMIT % I
PLASTICIN INDEX % I
GRADATION TEST RESULTS ;
Job No. 12-020 FIG.6
i
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
-�
-3
_2
-1
0
c
.�
�
� 1
m
U
N
a �
WATER ADDED
2
3
f
�
(
4 i
5
6 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 I
Pressure,p,ksf
Sample of CLAY,Sandy Natural Dry Unit Weight= 123.0 (pcf)
Source TH-2 Sample No. EIev./Depth 9.0 feet Natural Moisture Content= 6 %a
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS ,
�
Job No. 12-020 FIG.7
I
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers �
i
CLAYEY BACKFILL �O - - _
� I - - -
- - - - �
- - - - '
' BELOW GRADE WALL
� COMPACTED BACKFILL '
EDGE OF EXCAVATION
(EXCAVATE AS PER
OSHA REGULATIONS)
MANUFACTURED
WALL DRAIN�'
'
I WATERPROOFING
' OR DAMPPROOFING
'
�
�
�
FILTER FABRIC '
GRAVEL
12"
`PLASTIC SHEETING
I�►�12"MIN.
PERFORATED PIPE
NOTES:
1. DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF FOOTING AT THE
HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR
TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING.
2. EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO FOOTINGS SHOULD BE CUT AT A 1 TO 1
(HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)OR FLATTER SLOPE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE (
FOOTINGS. EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO FOOTINGS SHOULD NOT BE CUT
VERTICALLY.
3. THE DRAIN SHOULD BE LAID ON A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND
1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN.
4. GRAVEL SPECIFICATIONS: WASHED 1.5 INCH TO NO.4 GRAVEL WITH LESS
THAN 3%PASSING THE NO.200 SIEVE.
5. THE BELOW GRADE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS SHOULD BE �
PROTECTED FROM MOISTURE INFILTRATION BY APPLYING A SPRAYED ON
MASTIC WATERPROOFING,DAMPPROOFING,OR AN EQUIVALENT PROTECTION
METHOD.
TYPICAL WALL DRAIN DETAIL
JOB NO.12-OZO FIG.8
I
�
U
Z
� � �
� � � W
U U ,�„� � Z
E-� �; �; � � � U
�l a� a� � � U
Z
� � � � � � W
C�
Q U U � z
� Z J
� �
�
Z
O
U
F, �' w z
z � cn w
waa ., N =
� � � � °+
o w
a � � �
�
� � o � �
� N o [� � N �
� � O � v �--� •--� l� M
� � z � I
�
� � �
� � Wo
o � � � � �
� � � a
O � �
� � �
W �
w � �
O � a o
� � � `�
a
�
a
� �
�� � � � � \O M M Vl
J �.y � N N r-+ N �..
� Q ¢.i ,� ,� �--� .-� ,-�
W
� Q
�'� � z
F" [W-� o �r �r �n � r
� � z �-
z � °
� � � o0 000
� o
a � o � � � � N
W .. ,-� .-� ,� cy o
� Q N
�
a H H � l� l� z
� m
� �
�