The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRB130191 Approved PlansDate: May 23, 2013Revised: June 13, 2013GOLFCOURSEDESIGN10655 W. 73rd PLACE, A R V A D A , C O 8 0 0 0 5 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FA X : ( 3 0 3 ) 6 7 0 - 3 5 1 8 WWW.PHELPSGOLFD E S I G N . C O M Vail Golf Clu b - V a i l , C o l o r a d o Hole #18 100% Sub m i t t a l SCHEDULE of DRAWIN G S : COVER SHEETSHEET 1: Erosion/Dem o P l a n - 1 SHEET 2: Erosion/Dem o P l a n - 2 SHEET 3: Grading Plan- 1 SHEET 4: Grading Plan- 2 SHEET 5: Planting Plan- 1 SHEET 6: Planting Plan- 2 SHEET 7: Golf Construc t i o n D e t a i l s IRRIGATION PLANS:See Larry Rodgers Desi g n P l a n s D E S I G N R E V I E W B O A R D A P P R O V A L D a t e : P l a n n e r : 0 6 - 1 9 - 2 0 1 3 G e o r g e R u t h e r MA T C H L I N E -H O L E 1 8 GR E E N A R E A MA T C H L I N E -H O L E 1 8 TE E A R E A D-102 ROTOTILL AND BURY EX. BLUEGRASS SOUTH OF NEW #18 GREEN AND BUNKERS. EXISTING BUNKER SAND SHOULD BE REMOVED AND USED WITH TOPSOIL AROUND TEES AND GREENS. REMOVE (6) SHRUBS INCLUDING STUMPS SOD CUT TURF, SAVE AND REPLANT AFTER DRAINAGE INSTALL D-102 D-102 ROTOTILL AND BURY EX. BLUEGRASS SOUTH OF NEW #18 GREEN AND BUNKERS. EXISTING BUNKER SAND SHOULD BE REMOVED AND USED WITH TOPSOIL AROUND TEES AND GREENS. REMOVE (3) SHRUBS INCLUDING STUMPS REMOVE (3) SHRUBS INCLUDING STUMPS LIMITS OF FLOOD PLAIN D-103 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SOD CUT TURF, SAVE AND REPLANT AFTER DRAINAGE INSTALL D-105 DEMOLITION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY Bluegrass Removal 69,044 sf Cart Path Removal 2,777 sf Limits of Disturbance 84,495 sf D-102 D-103 D-105 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE HOLE 18 GREEN AREA Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, ColoradoGOLFCOURSEDESIGN 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM NORTH 0 feet100 1" = 50' 50 150 Date: May 23, 2013 Erosion/Demo Plan-1 Hole 18-Green Area D-103 D-101 D-101 ROTOTILL AND BURY EX. BLUEGRASS SOUTH OF NEW #18 GREEN AND BUNKERS. D-102 D-101 D-101 D-101 D-101 D-103 D-102 D-102 D-101 ROTOTILL AND BURY EX. BLUEGRASS REMOVE (4) TREES INCLUDING STUMPS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE REPAIR EX. ASPHALT PATH DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACCESS D-105 D-105 DEMOLITION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY Silt Fence 786 lf Bluegrass Removal 23,639 sf Cart Path Removal 4,143 sf Limits of Disturbance 44,351 sf D-101 D-102 D-103 D-105 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE HOLE 18 TEE AREA G O L F C O U R S E D E S I G N 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM Hole 18-Tee Area Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, ColoradoNORTH 0 feet100 1" = 50' 50 150 Date: June 13, 2013 Erosion/Demo Plan-2 31 EARTHWORK SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY 4" SOLID DRAINAGE PIPE 629 lf AREA_DRAINS DI-NDS-12 1 4" PERFORATED DRAINAGE PIPE WITHIN BUNKER CAVITY, 751 lf CONTRACTOR TO FIELD DESIGN/LAYOUT BASED ON FINAL BUNKER DESIGN 31-01 31-02 31-03 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE HOLE 18 GREEN AREA SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR INTERIOR 4" PERFORATED GREEN AND BUNKER CAVITY DRAINAGE INFORMATION. GRADE OUT EX. BUNKER 31-02 31-01 DAYLIGHT DRAIN PIPE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE MA T C H L I N E -H O L E 1 8 GR E E N A R E A MA T C H L I N E -H O L E 1 8 TE E A R E A G O L F C O U R S E D E S I G N 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM Hole 18-Green Area Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, ColoradoNORTH 0 feet100 1" = 50' 50 150 Date: May 23, 2013 Grading Plan-1 82 4 5 TE L 82 4 6 . 5 TEL 824 6 . 5 TEL 8 2 4 6 . 5 T E L 31-05 8 2 5 2 T E L 31-05 8 2 5 1 T O W 82 4 7 BO W 31-08 82 5 1 TO W 824 7 BO W 31-05 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 31-07 31-07 31-07 31-07 31-07 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY NEW ASPHALT CART PATH, WIDTH VARIES 3,679 sf SAND/ORGANIC ROOT ZONE MIX FOR TEE SURFACES 144.62 cy ROSETTA STONE WALL 4` HT.40 lf 31-05 31-07 31-08 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE HOLE 18 TEE AREA G O L F C O U R S E D E S I G N 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM Hole 18-Tee Area Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, ColoradoNORTH 0 feet100 1" = 50' 50 150 Date: June 13, 2013 Grading Plan-2 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY BUNKER SAND, 6" ON BOTTOM, 4" ON FACES 178.91 cy NATIVE SEED/EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 6,302 sf 31 EARTHWORK SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY IMPORTED TOPSOIL, 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OVER ALL AREAS OF 891.16 cy DISTURBANCE 1 2 31-02 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE HOLE 18 GREEN AREA TREES QTY COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME CONT CAL SIZE POP TRE 38 Quaking Aspen / Populus tremuloides B & B 4"Cal PSE DOU 13 Douglas Fir / Pseudotsuga menziesii B & B 12-15` H GROUND COVERS QTY COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME CONT 5,861 sf Creeping Poa / Agrostis stolonifera transplant 54,400 sf Kentucky Bluegrass / Poa pratensis sod PLANT SCHEDULE HOLE 18 GREEN AREA MA T C H L I N E -H O L E 1 8 GR E E N A R E A MA T C H L I N E -H O L E 1 8 TE E A R E A 1 1 2 31-02 (9) Quaking Aspen Quaking Aspen (7) (9) Quaking Aspen Creeping Poa (5,861 sf) 1 31-02 Kentucky Bluegrass (6,112 sf)1 (38,552 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass (5) Douglas Fir Quaking Aspen (3) Douglas Fir (4) Douglas Fir (4) Quaking Aspen (4) Quaking Aspen (6) Kentucky Bluegrass (880 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass (1,847 sf) (2,788 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass 31-02 (4,221 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass G O L F C O U R S E D E S I G N 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM Hole 18-Green Area Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, ColoradoNORTH 0 feet100 1" = 50' 50 150 Date: June 13, 2013 Planting Plan-1 (8,927 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass (807 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass (16,768 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass (2,409 sf) 2 31-02 31-02 31-02 31-02 (3) Quaking Aspen(5) Douglas Fir (5) Quaking Aspen Douglas Fir (6) (5) Douglas Fir (192 sf) Kentucky Bluegrass Douglas Fir (6) Quaking Aspen (5) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY NATIVE SEED/EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1,019 sf 31 EARTHWORK SYMBOL DESCRIPTION QTY IMPORTED TOPSOIL, 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OVER ALL AREAS OF 523.06 cy DISTURBANCE 2 31-02 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE HOLE 18 TEE AREA TREES QTY COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME CONT CAL SIZE POP TRE 13 Quaking Aspen / Populus tremuloides B & B 4"Cal PSE DOU 22 Douglas Fir / Pseudotsuga menziesii B & B 12-15` H GROUND COVERS QTY COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME CONT 29,103 sf Kentucky Bluegrass / Poa pratensis sod PLANT SCHEDULE HOLE 18 TEE AREA G O L F C O U R S E D E S I G N 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM Hole 18-Tee Area Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, ColoradoNORTH 0 feet100 1" = 50' 50 150 Date: June 13, 2013 Planting Plan-2 G O L F C O U R S E D E S I G N 10655 W. 73rd PLACE, ARVADA, CO 80005 TEL: (303) 670-0478 FAX: (303) 670-3518 WWW.PHELPSGOLFDESIGN.COM WIDTH TO MATCH WITH OF EXISTING PATH TO BE OVERLAID ASPHALT CART PATH-OVERLAY 1/2" = 1'-0" EXISTING PATH 2" COMPACTED ASPHALT PATH OVERLAY COMPACTED SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION LONGITUDINAL SECTION EXISTING PATH 1 P-GO-ASP-01 WIDTH 8' OR 12' ACCORDING TO PLAN SLOPE TO DRAIN AS DIRECTED BY GCA ASPHALT CART PATH-NEW 1/2" = 1'-0" 6" Class 6 Or Approved Equal Road Base Compacted Subgrade 3" Compacted Asphalt Golf Cart Path TYPICAL SECTION LONGITUDINAL SECTION 2 P-GO-ASP-02 DRAIN LINE CLEAN OUT 1/2" = 1'-0" NDS 107BC 6" ROUND 'VALUE' VALVE BOX, GREEN ONLY 4" POLYETHYLENE END CAP HIGHEST QUALITY TOPSOIL AT 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 10" MINIMUM SECTION OF 4" CORRUGATED POLYETHLENE TUBING, SMOOTH INTERIOR AND NON-PERFORATED, ADS N-12, CONTECH A-2000 OR EQUAL. #14 ELECTRICAL WIRE TAPED TO TOP OF TILE-COIL INSIDE VALVE BOX 4" CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE DRAIN TUBE (//32/<(7+</(1( FITTING, ADS 490 OR EQUAL EXISTING SOIL OR COMPACTED BORROW SOIL 3 P-GO-DRA-01 DAYLIGHTED DRAIN LINE 1/2" = 1'-0" CUT PIPE END TO MATCH FINISH GRADE, (MINIMUM 2:1) SPOT WELD 12" OPENING EXPANDED METAL OVER OPENING 6'-0" LENGTH C.M.P. OR STEEL SECURELY ATTACHED TO DRAIN TILE OR TUBE #14 ELECTRICAL WIRE TAPED TO TOP OF TILE LINE, WIRE TO BE PLACED INSIDE CMP AND WRAPPED AROUND CENTER OF EXPANDED METAL 4" DRAIN TILE MUST BE LAID IN BACKFILL MATERIAL, (EXTEND PIPE TO END OF 6' LENGTH OF C.M.P.) MINIMUM SLOPE = 1% EXISTING SOIL OR COMPACTED BORROW SOIL 4 P-GO-DRA-02 BULLNOSE SAND BUNKER 1/2" = 1'-0" BUNKER FINAL BULLNOSE VERTICAL BUNKER EDGE AFTER FLAT SHOVEL SCULPTING. WRAP SOD OVER BULLNOSED EDGE TO CAVITY OF BUNKER. HIGHEST QUALITY TOPSOIL AT 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 4" CORRUGATED PLASTIC DRAIN LINE EXISTING SOIL OR COMPACTED BORROW SOIL GRAVEL BACKFILL MATERIAL, 2" MINIMUM DEPTH #14 INSULATED ELECTRICAL WIRE TAPED TO TOP OF TILE, SPLICED AT INTERSECTIONS BUNKER SAND, 6" DEPTH ON BOTTOMS AND 4" ON BUNKER FACES INDICATES MINI-TRACK HOE'S VARYING VERTICAL CUT PRIOR TO BULLNOSE SCULPTING. HEIGHT OF CUT WILL VARY FROM 6" TO 24" INDICATES MINI-TRACK HOE'S VARYING VERTICAL CUT PRIOR TO BULLNOSE SCULPTING. HEIGHT OF CUT WILL VARY FROM 6" TO 24" 5 P-GO-DRA-03 SILT FENCE 3/4" = 1'-0" WOOD POSTS EXISTING SOIL POSTS TO BE BURIED 6"-8" BELOW GRADE AT BOTTOM MIRAFI SILT FENCE, OR EQUAL GRADE/WATER FLOW 6 P-GO-DRA-04 TEE SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" 1% SLOPE 1% SLOPE EXISTING SOIL OR COMPACTED BORROW SOIL HIGHEST QUALITY TOPSOIL AT 6" MINIMUM DEPTH6" SAND/ORGANIC MIX, (90/10) FINISH GRADE OF TURF 7 P-GO-DRA-05 TREE PLANTING 3/4" = 1'-0" PLANTING MIX, SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING MIX AND COMPACTION COMPACTED SUBGRADE 12" MIN STAKE GUY WIRE COARSE WOOD MULCH, 3" MINIMUM DEPTH LOCATE VERTICAL STAKES OUTSIDE PIT AREA DO NOT PRUNE LEADER ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF STAKING WITH POSTS AND GROMMETED STRAPS (DASHED LINES) 2" SAUCER (USE ONLY IN NON-IRRIGATED AREAS) TURNBUCKLE ROLL BURLAP 12 WAY DOWN ROOT BALL (MIN.), COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXCESS BURLAP, WIRE AND INORGANIC MATERIALS TOP OF BALL SHOULD BE 2"-4" ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE PRUNE BACK HEAD 25%, REMOVE DAMAGED BRANCHES GROMMETED STRAPS, (DO NOT USE GARDEN HOSE) NOTES: 1. REMOVE ALL GUYING AND WRAPPING ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING. 2. PLANT ALL PINES AND CHERRIES SO THAT TOP OF BALL IS SET 3" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE AND COVERED WITH SOIL. 8 P-GO-PLA-01 Hole #18 Vail Golf Club - Vail, Colorado Date: May 23, 2013 Construction Details TANNER CONSULTING GROUP Engineering Services P.O. Box 1860—Valley Springs, CA 95252 Phone: (209) 772-2233 Fax: (209) 772-2230 March 2, 2012 To: Mr. Mike Ortiz Vail Golf Club 1778 Vail Valley Drive Vail, CO 81657 Re: Vail Golf Club Driving Range Golf Ball Trajectory Study Tanner Consulting Group was contacted by Mr. Todd, the golf course superintendent of Vail Golf Course, to create a Golf Ball Trajectory Study and recommended improvements for the driving range in an attempt to contain golf balls that have been exiting the driving range field property. Particular attention was to be paid to the right side of the driving range. In addition, I was instructed to minimize the visual impacts to the surrounding neighbor's homes wherever possible. In early January 2012, I spoke with Mr. Todd. During this conversation, we spent time discussing the driving range and outlying areas in order to determine the scope of work I would need to perform. Afterwards, I spoke with other staff to discuss the project. Mr. Todd and the staff provided data and information that was essential for the creation of my golf ball trajectory study and recommended improvement plans. The following is my basis for analysis and conclusions: Procedure for Computing the TraiectorV of a Golf Ball The procedure for calculating the trajectory of a golf ball in air is described. Trajectory of a Projectile with Air Resistance A golf ball flying through the air is acted upon by only two forces, namely the aerodynamic force and gravity. Because the ball is spherical and probably has little spin, the aerodynamic force is nearly all drag and acts opposite to the direction of velocity. We can write the equation of motion as: drag + gravity = mass x acceleration This is a vector equation and each vector has a horizontal and a vertical component. Because the drag is a non-linear function of velocity, we will not be able to find an analytic solution and a numerical solution will be necessary. Hence, we have two second order non-linear differential equations. If you want to be a skilled consultant, you need to 1 be able to solve equations of this sort with ease, because most of the real problems of the consulting world do not yield to simple linear analysis. The usual technique is to replace the two second order differential equations with four first order equations. The four variables are the x and Y components of position and the x and y components of velocity. Call them x, y, vx and vy. The four equations are dx/dt = vx dy/dt = vy d(vx)/dt = (1/mass) x (dragX + gravityX) d(vy)/dt = (1/mass) x (dragY + gravityY) and, of course, gravityX is zero. Aerodynamic Drag of a Sphere Everything is quite simple except for the calculation of the drag force. The traditional way to express the drag of an object such as a sphere is through a drag coefficient defined as the drag force divided by the product of the frontal area and the dynamic pressure. The dynamic pressure is defined as one-half the density times the square of the velocity. This gives a model of the varying atmospheric force on the sphere as the velocity and altitude change. The drag coefficient of a sphere traveling at speeds typical of golf ball is about 0.5 but I have used a procedure taken from Chow, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Mechanics this allows us to use this program to study other spheres such as BBs or ping-pong balls or cannon balls or even a 20-ton Soyuz entry capsule and observe their behavior as they fly through the atmosphere. To use this routine, one needs to know the Reynolds number of the flow which requires the density of the air as well as the viscosity of air. You can see the routines in the program that compute these quantities and eventually return the drag coefficient to the procedure that computes the acceleration. You have to know velocity, elevation, air density, drag coefficient, gravity and it all comes together in the calculation of acceleration. Solution of the Differential Equations Each of the four variables is a function of time. To perform the numerical integration, we take time steps of finite size and advance the solution. The best way to do this is to use a variable step-size differential equation solver that computes the step size as it develops the solution. However, for this simple problem, we felt it would be confusing to introduce variable step size. So the calculations are done with a simple fixed step size algorithm. Long fly balls stay in the air about five or six seconds, so a step size of 0.1 seconds gives something like 50 or 60 finite steps for the numerical equation solver. The most straightforward way to proceed is to use a fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm. 2 Correction of the final point At each step along the trajectory, we check to see that the altitude is greater than the initial altitude. Eventually, of course, we will arrive at a point where this is no longer true. This is our clue to terminate the calculation. The fixed step size in time will most likely step over the point where the altitude is exactly equal to the initial altitude and give a point with negative altitude as the final point. To make the solution look good, it is best to do an interpolation in the final interval and land right on zero altitude. Assumption of Zero Spin The analysis above assumes that there is negligible spin on the ball and the total aerodynamic force is exactly opposite in direction to the velocity. This is not the case for a faded or drawn ball. The craft of a fade or draw is largely a study in putting the proper amount of spin on the ball. Calculating the path of a hit ball is more complex. Actually, a golf ball can have quite a bit of spin but this is always associated with a glancing hit and the initial velocity will be low. The only way to get a long ball is to hit it squarely. Conclusion of Study We have completed a statistical study of golf ball trajectories to determine the maximum height and distance that the golf ball travels under the parameters indicated on the accompanying plans in an attempt to create a ball containment netting system. (SEE SHEETS N-1, N-2, N-3, N-4, N-5, N-6). N-1 Site Plan, N-2 Golf Ball Trajectory Study, N- 3 Plan view of netting recommendations, N-4 and N-5 are Isometric views of netting plans and N-6 is Construction Details. We found that the golf ball could easily escape the driving range property over the current netting and fencing system. The areas of concern were along the right range boundary line, around the clubhouse and the 18th green. The area beyond the left fence and back of the driving range was not of concern. AREA #1 THE CURRENT TEE The existing tee area of the current tee is approximately 33,000 square feet. 135' deep and 225' wide. The left and right sides of the tee run parallel with the range boundary. The surface area is slightly crowned but leans from the front to the back of the tee. AREA #2 THE RANGE AREA From the back of the tee to the very end of the range is nearly 300 yards in length. When you move to the front of the tee, the range is shortened to 250 yards in length. 3 AREA #3 HOLE 18 AND PROPOSED AREA OF IMPROVEMENT There are a number of proposed improvements that are being considered around and including the existing clubhouse and the 18th green. As is indicated on ball trajectory study, the current netting is not capable of containing all of the golf balls from the current driving range and by the current range fencing. Based on our findings there are a few recommendations we can make that will help contain nearly all the golf balls on the driving range area. SOLLUTIONS Area #1: The driving range tee. We would recommend that the golf tee be redesigned to be contoured around a radius point 180 yards from the center of the driving range. The tee should be re-graded to slope forward a minimum of 2% from back to front. A matted tee area should be constructed at the back edge of the turf in the same manor. Improvements would have to include drainage, irrigation, sand and grassing. The estimated cost for this would be: $61,000. Area #2: The driving range area. The size of the facility is probably adequate for the clubs needs. The only thing that can possibly assist with golf ball containment would be to enhance the target greens and promote golfers aiming to the center of the range but having the ability to use the vast majority of golf clubs in their bag. The estimated cost for this would be: $20,000. In addition, we would highly recommend that the golf course range use a limited flight golf ball. We have seen a quite a swing in this direction. Today golf ball manufacturers are making golf balls that reduce the height and distance a golf ball travels while still giving the golfer the great feel of a standard golf ball. Some of these new range balls actually last four times the time of a standard range ball. The estimated cost for this would be: $17,000. Although the flight of the golf ball will be restricted, the golf ball itself will still fly over the existing netting. By changing the golf ball you will reduce the height and length of the netting needed to contain the golf balls within the range are. Area #3: The areas for proposed improvements next to the driving range can really only be made safe by adding additional netting to the driving range facility. The proposed netting baffle system with the Srixon golf ball accomplishes this task very well while minimizing the visual impact. Because the nets are arranged in baffles, the poles are less obtrusive to the eye in all directions. The poles can also be stepped down in diameter to help minimize the visual impact. The estimated cost for this would be: 393,000 with the Srixon ball. The estimated cost would be $452,000 with a standard range ball. 4 Rosetta Stone Wall Proposal This is the #3 hole lightning shelter Rosetta Stone Wall. Based on feedback we received on the #7 hole retaining wall we added stone on the top avoid it being flat and level. The goal was to create a more natural look. We propose doing the same on the #18 wall This is the same wall one year later after the vegetation has grown in. Please note that the wall tapers up and undulates across the top and then tapers back down. We propose that the #18 wall be installed using a similar technique. This is a close up of the rock wall, please note that the front of the wall is not an even surface, there are rocks that protrude forward and others that are set back. The wall system was created to mimic the existing rock formations in Vail by color, texture and depth.