The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB13-0146 soils report - _ _ . _ � Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TQWN OF VAIl. � va�i, co s�ss� Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application/Permit#(s) information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions .�_` � �1' I / ��,��--�° \ ( ) Response to Correction letter `-C LO attached copy of correction letter ,��0� ( ) Deferred Submittal '�� Other��F�IAL �u-SP�,TiDU «h�/��'� Project Street Address: f3�`� J�i��FI-I-�(� C,R-CE-JL (Number) (Street) (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: Description of Transmittal/List of Changes, Items Attached: Applicant,lnformation S��C'�� rj�5,�� (architect,contractor,owner/owner's rep) � �� ^��`(�� (=Q.� r0 OTF,�S �-'�� LJ,b-L_L Contact Name: (�....P�R`; �-� 1 Lt �- - Address: �Q �� City �i,.1/�12��5 State:C--'� Zip:�� Contact Name: („-1��.�( �-1- ILL (use additional sheet if necessary) Contact Phone: �� .i� ��c �� Building Permits: � Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations(Labor&Materials) Contact E-Mail: ��(�)�l.- �.jj� L�{✓�,t`�I�. �I�,� �DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: $ in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to ;Plumbing: $ comply with the information and ptot plan,to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according ;Electrical: $ to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: $ ordinances of the T a plicable thereto. X �j Total: $ � , Own r/ wner's epresentative Signature(Required) Date Received: � (� _._ ��-J—_�� L� � � � V lS For Office Use Only: D Fee Paid: ��°� 1 � �o,J Received From: Cash Check# CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: TOWIV OF VAIL Authorization # September 25, 2013 Subject: Interim Materials Testing Summary, 1388 Buffehr Creek Road, Vail, Colorado ��q 138'8 32inR Pr►rc.N �U Job Number: 13-6575 Mr. Gary Hill Hill Construction, Inc. PO BOX 1735 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Dear Mr. Gary Hill, For the period ending September 21St, 2013, representatives of GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. were on site to provide materials testing services at times scheduled by the Contractor, Subcontractor and/or Owner. Our reports have been completed in the field as our testing and observations were performed. The Contractor and applicable Sub Contractors were notified of the testing results and/or observations prior to our departure from the project site. This summary report includes the observation reports as well as the materials test results. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions concerning these reports. Sincerely, GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. Digitally signed by Chris Hutto C��I S H U��O DN:tn=ChriS Hutto,o=Ground Engineering,ou=Area Manager, email=chrish@groundeng.com,c=US � Date:2013.09.25 14:09:33-06'00' Chris Hutto, CET Construction Services Manager RouH� ENGINEERING CdNSULTFIh1T5 INC. 101A Airpark Dr.,Unit 9,PO Box 464,Gypsum,CO 81637 Phone(970)524-0720 Fax(970)524-0721 www.groundeng.com O�ce Locations: Engtewood . Commerce City . Loveland . Granby . Gypsum . Grand Junction . Casper,WY . 1388 Buffehr Creek Road Vail,Colorado Concrete Compressive Strength and Field Test Results Job#13-6575 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Period Ending 9/21/2013 �� Client: Mr.Gary Hili Hiil Construction,Inc. PO Box 1735 EhlC�tNEERtN .�,� CCJI�tSULTRNT'� Edwards,C081632 1388 Buffehr Creek Rd Concrete Cover Report C)at8: August 13,2013 JAb NUf71b2f: 13-6575 General Contractar: H;n cor,str��t�or, Rep. Notified: �ary As scheduled, a representative visited the project site to perform periodic concrete testing. The locations of each sample are approximate. �r;��=��+.> ti5r � �oias� "gn � �"�� n , � �� , . a� �, � � s �-�-, r � +n ��a� � ��t�"� �,��; �� '��" +g ° � �•� �� a. � � ��& � „� a,ro ,�:.� `"„„y7 ,��kw '�.:� �- . '# � �..� ' ;.,a � � y � � � � � �� - • ��,:� �`.� r°�"�` a �'€.. �' �t�';, .�.._ � Y .x.,.,� .i�. ��,�za � � .. � ��'ra s, � �,.« �,�r" 's' � g , ..�.� �'�°"� : . '� �'� � � 4v � '��+�� '�:�,"°r ��-�.�. � ", .. � ��. � �'� ac:�-�'w�.'aa< .� a t;'.� ��'�,��.: -�� '°�.. �'p � r��,,� "'i t �,.c �#`�r"�` 'c:L� '1%.�� 3 v �' pR �y.�,:�5. §.� � �._ � z y �. �� r �� .�" �;, r�a-` � , W� � � # � � � ^ 4 ,xeS, �-.,�.�� ,ye ��-._.. »r = *"" 9 .� �� . I�� :��'' °,�'if>� � s� N .�}a' E �. � � '�� 'd�Y2` ��'1 2�.+^. '��.: . . . . i � . a�4 �JI��°� r "'s�'' °�x f;.' � : � � �w«�,:.�.. . �,'., �� . ��, �, �� " '� � . � � �'r�� v. � ��,riK°°� r. � �',�'.. "r►�`� ��':.�. � s ��. �...;� . . , , ° =�� , . � -''`-° � . �.� ` � �ii�l��_ a��;: ��-._-t� �, ��,< , . � . x_- ,�� ,�` '"a �� `<�,�° .vw�;" ��4z. � '�tgL.�� i �l ar � . A�r� • � � .. �:�� :t 1 77 ap 3�,a� ��`�. „�r,�.,�`w� _'�.�""'�, � 4 4 i �} � ��t�4z �' ,� �" �:��"" < ��a�"`'�.. � �� , �� _ �� x� k. + ,�, �-�.> ,,:� , „�. � �� .� p � y i 4� .�`+.��x. $E � � p��,y�a ��°',*'��",y'�'9 `��V'�� ,� . :.E . .,. '",.�". ,,,. '�', a'��. Yes No Rlot Applicable Results within Specifications? (�; �; (�; Reinforcing Steel Ghecked? � �' �t Subgrade Tested? {�;; �: �; Number of Cylinders Cast this Date: 4 Number of Pages Attached: � Field Representative: she�ton Adams www.groundeng.com Englewood, Commerce City, Loveland,Granby, Gypsum, Grand Junction, Casper �� Client: Mr.Gary Hill Hill Construction,Inc. PO Box 1735 E N .C�'.-�I N E E Fi 1 N C C�P�J'�-�"ULTR NT5 Edwards,C0 81632 1388 Buffehr Creek Rd Report Date: September 10,2013 Job Number: 13-6575 Placement Date: August 13,2013 General Contractor: Hill Construction Rep.Notified: Gary Placement Contractor: Rep.Notified: Cancrete Supplier. United Mix Identification: 35710401 Total Cubic Yards Placed: 20 WeatheriTernp.: Cloudyl70s Placement Methad: pump Finish Method: Hand item Number/Structure Type: Footers Place;ment Location: All footers 5pecifications Specified Strength{psi): 3,000 Air Cantent(%j: 3-6 Slump(in.}: 4 max Temperature(°F): 50-90 Concrete Field Properties Slump/ Air Conc. Unit Spread Content Tem� Wei ht Water Test Sample Location Truck Ticket Batch Test Time r� g Adcied No. Numbc�r Number Time C143 C231 C1064 C138 (inches) (°/tij ('F) {pcf) tgal.) Furthest SE footer 1 6390 165949 12:50 2:1 d 3 1/2 4.5 78 140.8 0 Ccrrripressive Strength Rc�sults{ASTM G39) Cylindcrs Casf on Ticket Number: 165949 Total N��mber of Cylind�;rs Cast:4 Labaratory ID:5182 Cylinder Diameter(in.) 4.00 4.00 4,00 4.00 Cross Sectional Area(sq.in.} 12.57 12.57 12.57 12.57 �7 �'� �� , Maximum Load(Ibs.) 37,000 52,410 50,950 ��.�� Compressive Strength(psi) 2,940 4,170 4,050 ; �� ''•.' � ',� �. Test Date 8l20/13 9/10/13 9110/13 �,�� Test Aye{days} 7 28 28 H �� ?� Fracture Type T5 T5 T5 Average 2fi-Day Compressive Strength(psi): 4,110 Field 7echnician: Shelton Adams Comments: www.groundeng.com Engiewood, Commerce City, Loveland,Granby,Gypsum, Grand Junction,Casper • �� Client: Mr.Gary Hill Hill Construction,Inc. PO Box 1735 ENCINEERINC C�NSIJLTANTS Edwards,C081632 1388 Buffher Creek Rd Concrete Cover Report Date: au9usc 2�,2013 Job Number: �s-s5�5 General Contractor: Hiu construction Rep. Notified: �ary As scheduled, a representative visited the project site to perform periodic concrete testing. The locations of each sample are approximate. Comments or Photos: �� „;,� ti � �� t� � �:M ��, � � �� W. � � ~ �� ,�,�;,�,�- � ,a ...a .r :� � � y �, '` ,,, "•�'�-,; g„. . -�.�^ ,�,�,,,°v�'�'� � ,�' z,��.�s , � � s r>, I� �.�a'�� '�.w:�"'„Y�„;� -x �� r.�°".�. ak.. � '�� .. y�� ..� * . 4 a "�' ��,�`��°"�`"' � °�.- ��+ '� e ""�.t_°? h�'�';s S� �`�R %�s �' ye y�'p e . , V ..�., . I r� 3��. ; - � � � 1 a 3�.� � e.��c"� � �, 4 ' "�� r�.�, �8 { "� ' � �a� � _ '� �: �as � i i� �^�'��'� �� ,r.�,r.- �y?. m . �:;; �. �c';.: ..,�.,,,;�°,_ .. � f � � �� '� �� tic� 3 �v;' � �� .� � �.�� , ti'�` >. � , e ,ti �. � ; ,� � . �� g ,�n �.. � . .-s `- .- - �� '� � � � ��°� ° �.� , �'' � "'r �+�. �'�: �r�_., �. ,a. � � � r+�+ ,�. � ' �� - ' �w'�"�+ `'� .-�?x ��.s �i� � � ��.�. =IF..«^'f" �Jr. "r'�' _ i� . � �e�'tt a,�; � '� ,a^.; � � ,�i, � ., <,�.sA� . .. . .........°W,��.: .w Mw�:.,_e� . � .,�..� . ... , ..�'>�:'� '�`:..., . ....,.�`��..r✓ �...n��.brt^r Yes No Not Applicable Results within Specifications? �; �'; � Reinforcing Steel Checked? � (� �_ Subgrade Tested? (�: �; � Number of Cylinders Gast this Date: 4 Number of Pages Attached: � Field Representative: �eeTai�evran www.groundeng.com Englewood, Commerce City, Loveland, Granby, Gypsum, Grand Junction, Casper �� Client: Mr.Gary Hill Hill Construction,Inc. PO Box 1735 E I�J�1 N E E R 1 N C C O t�J 51�LTA NT'S Edwards,co si ss2 1388 Buffher Creek Rd Report Date: September 18,2013 Job Number: �3-fi575 Placemant Date: August 21,2013 General Contractor: Hill Construction Rep.Notified: Gary Placement Contractor: DC Concrete Rep.Notified: David Conr.,rete Supplier: United Mix identification: 35710401 Total Cubic Yards Placed: 3g Weather?Temp.: Clear/80's Placement Mc�thad: Pump Finish h4ethod: Hand item Number i5tructure Type: Residential building Placement Lor..ation: All foundation walis Specifications Specified Strenyth(psi): 3,000 Air Cantc;nt(°io): 3-6 Slump(in.j: 4 max Temperature(°F): 50-90 Concrete Field Properties Siump? Air Conc. Unit Water 7est Truck 7icket Batch Spread Content 7emp. Weight Added Sample Locafion Test Time C143 C231 C1064 C138 No. Nurr�bc�r Nurr�ber Tim� (inches) (`.�n1 ('F} (Pcf) (gal.j NW wall of bldg 2 0000 332005Q1 11:12 12:20 31/2 6.3 75 140.0 D Cc�mpressive Strength Results(ASTtii C39) Cylinders Cast on Ticket Numk�rr: 33200501 Total Number of Cylinders Cast:4 Laboratory ID:5199 Cylinder Diameter(in.) 4.00 4.00 4.OQ 4.00 Cross Sectional Area(sq.in.) 12.57 12.57 12.57 12.57 �� ° �3 � Maximum�oad(Ibs.) 36,420 46,840 45,750 , ; ��O �� 5E ' R��x- Campressive Strength(psij 2,900 3,730 3,640 �� , �� ," °�'� �� . � � Test Date 8/28/13 9/18/13 9/18/13 �� Test Aye(days) 7 28 28 H °:��`w� Fracture Type , T5 T5 T5 Average 2t�-Day Compressive Strength(psi): 3,690 Field Technician: LeeTal Levran Comments: Dustin with united informed of air result,truck accepted and poured. www.groundeng.com Englewood, Commerce City, Laveland,Granby, Gypsum, Grand Junction, Casper ��I�� Client: Mr.Gary Hill Hil�Construction,Inc. PO Box 1735 Et�1�1NEERINt� C0�+151..IL'T'ANTS Edwards,coa�ss2 1388 Buffher Creek Rd Concrete Cover Report �at8: September 17,2013 Job Number: 13-6575 General Cantractor: H;ii construot�or, Rep. Notified: Gary As scheduled, a representative visited the project site to perform periodic concrete testing. The locations of each sample are approximate. Comments or Photas: , :�- � ,� �� , � � �� 5�� ag � �� ,� F� � . � � � "�v �4� � � E ��i��ly ��Y��i �\� �vNf ��' � 4 v. �.a � �� t ��., R� � +�i ipyj�� V .'. ��,�� °� re,�q '�'4°�;?. � �"� s� �pS-_ '� w�' s . �� .� �°� �, ,;,��" ,.�,,, � �' , q ^� a � � v� s�r i' _�. z � � � � �� ,�� ; � 8 �:,��r . ' � �a � :r:-� ��i - � `�`� �at p,�� .�'�:a� c � � �� :� �� ' e �" 2 :�,� �� ,,� � ;t�� . , µ � �� ' .. � . � r �a ' rb:� �. � ., v� u Y � �*-�.� �....r z f �n ' ��• � s_, ��' �, � - �� :;.>>�^ ;•Y��°Dd� . �=�'=s:m�.=� ,. , �a.; „� x'.��"�„ �," � a' `°-5,,;...., � �o'� � `;•+�� n $ . � �� t " �` a �� : � ` � �- '�.� �� r � � .�� °�« �'�. n �` .n H � �,.,�dl , N�'�#g� (; T �� 4, „ ... , �.. . � � ...�s.,w. s� 11 , �.. �. ., i,� � �. . �. �°A N � ��'4�. � � � �',�{ �`i, i �� „�d �� °��4�� u+s�f4';7 ,.� y„�`� „+�� !fi � s,� � 5 E �a � �. �y 1��i3L '�+. ';�. y�� N"� _ ,��v3a' �; 'Y�.� ma�. �, , � ,, ,. ;, � I�.I�' , ..;. s �,�. g i i � �6��I��IIIP�P",�� g �' �� = y. ��. � i7 w � � � r i �dlVll�� . 'r`�i�i �pPl�'llii��lil�il� � �� :n> � z � .�s.� A �. �.�� .y' Yes No Not App6cable Results within Specifications? �; �, (�: Reinforcing Steel Checked? �: �'? {�°� Subgrade 7ested? (� (�: {�: Number of Cylinders Cast this Date: 4 Number of Pages Attached: � Field Ftepresentative: �oei smart www.groundeng.cam Englewood, Commerce City, Loveland, Granby, Gypsum, Grand Junction, Casper . � Client: Mr.Gary Hill �� PIO Box 1735ion,Inc. ENCINEERINC C�t�{SULTANT'S Edwards,C081632 1388 Buffher Creek Rd Report Date: September 24,2013 Job Number: 13-6575 Placement Date: September 17,2013 General Contrackor. Hill Construction Rep.Notified: Gary F'lacement Contractor: DC Concrete Rep.Notified: David Concrrte Supplier: United Mix idenkifir..ation: 35710401 Total Cubic Yards Placed: 45 Weather.'Ternp.: Partly Cloudy 70's Placemrnt Method: Pump Finish Methad: Hand ftem Nun7berlStructure Type: Residential building PlacFment Lor..ation: Garage Foundation walls Specifications Specified Strength{psi): 3,000 Air Content(%): 3-6 Slump(in.}: 4 max Temperature(°F): 50-90 Concrete Field Properties Slump! Air Conc. Unit Water Test Truck Ticket Batch S�read Content Temp. Weight ��{�� N� Sarnple Location Number Number Time Test Time C143 C231 C10E;4 C138 (inches) {4%) ('Fj (pcf) (gal.j 3 SE corner of garage wall 6391 33200986 12:45 2:Q0 4 3.5 75 144.9 - Comprt.ssive Strer�gth R�sults{ASTh1 C39) CylincJc;rs Cast on Tieket Number: 33200986 Total Number c>f Cylinders Cast:4 Laboratory ID:5246 Cylinder Diameter(in.j 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Cross Sectional Area(sq.in.) 12.57 12.57 12,57 12.57 � �,a;;�; Maximum Load(ibs.) 48,53Q �� Compressive 5trength(psij 3,860 �� ` \ Tes#Datc� 9/24/13 10/15/13 10/15(13 � '� Test Aye(daysj 7 28 28 H Fracture Type T5 Average 2E3-Day Compressive Strength(psi): Field 7echnician: Joel Smart Comments: www.groundeng.cam Englewood, Commerce City, Loveland, Granby, Gypsum, Grand Junction,Casper = Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL � va�i, co s�ss� Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. Application/Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions ,� '� ` Q i I 1 � �- ` � . O Response to Correction Letter �l � attached copy of correction letter fJ�-J 1�°--�(.�(S ( ) Otherred Submittal Project Street Address: 1��8 ��?��2. ��r�L � (Number) (Street) (Suite#) BuildinglComplex Name: Description of Transmittal/List of Changes, Items Attached: �.�n ��.�i n �-��Jk�-- Applicant_Information OP r-�.�i �-K?l,i, �O)L� (�..�� (Z-LT , (architect,contractor,owner/owner's rep) Contact Name: (r,1�� t�c � �-1-. ; Address: �9 �OX 1 �3� City �.-t��n��.�� State: � Zip: � a. Contact Name: (use additional sheet if necessary) Contact Phone: .� l� - � -1� � Building Permits: _�^ n � �(� u�/'�p-,�n�-�.�� Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor&Materials) Contact E-Mail: —f�� 1"1 l.C>�"�uP (DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out Building: � in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, ' ' ' and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to ';p�umbing: $ comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town ` ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according ?Electrical: $ ' to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: $ ordinances of t e Town a 'ca hereto. X v Total: $ Owner/Owner's Representati ig ature (Required) Date Received: p � � � a � � For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: ��3 � 2 �ot� Received From: Cash Check# CG ��O CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp,date: TOWN QF VAIL Authorization# i l I��>c�.sztlt a .i4x-1E1�y�rc.>t4��I3�3�,;;�1,Cx�i�:, . . �.��}�_�.t I7£r�'�\i)..a3 � `� �I�rll+:s� 7``�4"1�! L .LCi,F�E�s.Tliii''�i 'l�,:t<.�`+,,. �i'? ,' E-�FF��4��t�'C-�-P1�INLAK GE��TEGH�IiCI�I, l,ES, t1�� r ",-.,,�?=1 anz.��i,ji�, ,,��'it:ii�, �n�r�_h, :r:t September �10, 2013 Hill Construction Att�n: Gary Hi11 I?. �. Box 1735 Edwards, Colorado S 1632 (��.}fllill d;cent�rrytel.ilct) Job No. 113 284A Subject: Observation ofNorthern Partian of Excavatinn, Proposed Ruttum Residence, Parcel C, Briar Patch, 1388 BuffeUr Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Ga�-y: As requested, a representative af Hepwortl�-Pawlak Ge�technical, Inc. �bserved the excavation at the subject site on September S, 2Q13 ta evaluate the sails exposed far faundation suppart. Tl�e findings of our observations and recoinlziendatiai�s fc�r the foundatian design are presented in this report. We previously observed tlze excavatian for ttle southens portion of the residence at the site and presented our findings in a re�ort dated August 12, 2013, Job No. 113 248A. The residence will be a single story wood frame structure ov�r a basement level. Circ�und floors will be slab-on-grade. The building has been designed to be suppo��ted c�n spread footings assutning an allawable soi]bearing pressure of 2,500 psf: The northen�portion of the builr�ing steps up from the southern portion previously abserved. At the tiine af our site visit, the foundation exc;avation for the northern portion nt tl�e residence was nearly complete and 11ad been cut ui�nuttiple levels fro�n about 3%ta 14 feet b�low �tl�e adjacent �•ound surface. The naitheastern portion ofthe excavation was not camplete. The soils exposed in the bottom of thc excavation cansisted af relaCively dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders. The results of a gradation analysis perfarmed on a sample of the coarse��ranular soils (mu�us 3 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented an Figure 1. No free��ater was encountered in the excavation and the sc�ils were slightiy moist ta moist. The southern portion af the excavation(basement) foundation walls were in-place at this time. Tlle sail conditions exposed in#he excavation are consistent with those previously e�lcountered on tl�e site and suitable for support c�f sprcad faotings designed for the recoinmended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Laose and disturbed soils shoulcl �'Glt'�:c'l' �l1�-�y`�l..<<� �k} � �,i t�E'}"�l��a.} `,'��"78'tli:.x; { ��)„(�3�i�.:t.�ft 7 � `,`?!�;'<"Ct�itFl`E1e, �)F l,��fg�..E t.d*j�) Hill Constructiot� 5eptember 1�, 2013 Page 2 be removed in the footing areas to expase the undisturbed natural coarse granular sails and the subgrade cornpacted. Voids 1'rUrn boulder remaval bela�v footing areas should t�e replaced witll compacted roacl base or conerete. Ottier recommendatians presented in our previous report wl�ich are applicable should also be observed. Ifyou liave any questions or need further assistance, �lease call our o#�ice. Sincerely, � HEPWORTH—PA K G�OTECHNIGAL, TNG. } $ �,,�� f� �� yy�, � r'��/"'� >��!� �6o�pC ��q y r4'ao � � y �♦` 4� David A, YouYig, P.E. � ;C3� .� �' . �, �,��, 32-2�� ;x�� (T '" ,� . j,- DAY/1' ` ' ,�,�• ��! �:��c°+J a JC ��. �i�� 'a�aee'`� t'4`e" '0 ✓��g.�� attachment Figure l, Gradat�on'l�est Results ___..__.. .�_ Jc�b No. 1 t3 284A c,�C?t@C�"1 �-.. �_,m..��_.._� .-. ,� �..� • •• , � .� �� .�-��....��..�...�.��--- ��.....��.��..r��,..��,.�..� ��.��,..��.��...� ��..��...�..��•�...r ��...�.�.�.��.��.�� w��a�� rr�� a�� ww�� •� � �� r��w�� .n..�� r1�11��i �� l�� r�� w�� r��rr��w�� r��rrra�� w��rr��rr�� :� ��w��rr��r�� r��r�� rr��I�� r�i�� rr��r�r�r�� r�r��s��rr�� r��.r�� r�rrr�w��rr��r�� r��11�� r/-��II�� r��.r�� I��/� �irr��w� ��r��rrr��r��w� ��i��1��II��1��A ��rt��r�r��wt � ��A��.��r�� -I��A�� '� ��r�� r�.n�r� ��rrs�� ii��r��r ��rr��.w��a�� w��'��r • ��a��.�� ir��r�l�� w��r�� iw��►��i��rrr ��rr��w��•�� `r��r�� r��r��I��rr�� w�� w�� a�� ' ��rrr��rww��wwr� �� I�w��rr� � ' .1 ��w��w��r�� r��^� ��Y�� r��r�� A��r��I��r�� r�� r�l�i�i��rr��r�� rr��r��r�� i��^ � ��r��.��.��r��^� �� w��rr��w��r�� r��r� ��ir��w��rr� ��w��rr� ��il�� -��/� ��.�� -� ��11II��1��IwR��r� ��r��.�� -i�� -��r�� -�� -��-��r�� -�� •� �-�� ' �-��I��i ��-�� -��r�� 5�� r�r� � �� / � �� •�� . ��0 , . � ' � � . • '� :• • � • �• • • • 1• � 1 �� V � � � � � � � Department of Community Development 0 75 South Frontage Road TOWN OF VAIL ' Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSMITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon eissuance of the permit. Application/Permit#(s) information applies to: Attention: ( ) Revisions 1 0 I //, ( ) Response to Correction Letter 6 `�62 _attached copy of correction letter ( ) Deferred Submittal (3 0 15 P40ther SOILS i ,Po/L�T Project Street Address: (Number) (Street) (Suite#) Building/Complex Name: Description of Transmittal/List of Changes, Items Attached: Applicant.Information (architect, contractor, owner/owner's rep) i Contact Name: (�69Y h AIL_ s Address: I>Q Wx, I� \\ City r-b J_,J J�s�S State: (:�:_Q_Zip: Contact Name: q, (use additional sheet if necessary) VSO 3°t0 `�� l3 Contact Phone: Building Permits: Contact E-Mail: G_A& �L,L p) )gym ur"evised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor& Materials) (DO NOT include original valuation) I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,filled out s Building: $ in full the information required,completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to Plumbing: $ comply with the information and plot plan,to comply with all Town r ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according Electrical: $ to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other Mechanical: $ ordinances oft Tow le thereto. X Total: $ Owner/Owner's epresentati a ignature (Required) Date Received: I For Office Use Only: Fee Paid: FAUG Received From: 1 9 1 01J Cash Check# CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: OF VAIL Authorization # 3 D1 q& 1 k-pwof l'aw1a1 tae:�textuu.. . 11 5U4i�1..fi)llnt4 Rz-'Wctd 154 t Glenwood Sptings Colorado 81601 Phone-970M5-7988 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Rm 9701-945-8454 email. August 12, 2013 Hill Construction Attn: Gary Hill P. O. Box 1735 Edwards, Colorado 81632 h i l l@centuryt el.net) Job No. 113 284A Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Ruttum Residence, Parcel C, Briar Patch, 1388 Buffehr Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Gary: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on August 8, 2013 to evaluate the materials exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Hill Construction, dated August 7, 2013. The residence will be a single story wood frame structure over a basement level. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. The building has been designed to be supported on spread footings assuming an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Only the southern portion of the residence is being constructed at this time. At the time of our site visit, the foundation excavation for the southern portion of the residence had been cut in multiple levels from about 3 to 15 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The materials exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted primarily of hard, fractured sandstone bedrock with relatively dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles(residual sandstone bedrock) in the shallow cut areas. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the coarse granular soils (minus 5 inch fraction)obtained from the site are presented on Figure 1. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils and bedrock were slightly moist to moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils and bedrock designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf can be used for support of the proposed residence. There is some risk of differential settlement due to the variable bearing conditions and especially at the transition from bedrock to soils bearing areas. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed materials in footing areas should be removed and the bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils or bedrock. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing Parker 303-841-7119 * Colorado Sprints 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 Hill Construction August 12, 2013 Page 2 elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pef for on-site soil and well broken bedrock, excluding oversized rocks, as backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the basement walls and prevent wetting of the lower level. The underdrain should include at least 4 inches of free draining gravel below the basement floor slab. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils and well broken bedrock, or a suitable granular import material such as road base, compacted to at least 95%of standard Proctor density(SPD) at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted to at least 90% SPD(95% in pavement areas) and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. Landscape that requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, and sprinkler heads should not be located within 3 feet of the foundation. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the materials exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that materials beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence,prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC)developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEO' &CYNICAL, INC. David A. Young, P.E. „ G� 32-2 3 ,rte v DAY/1'Jg '� � r��q..ar.�'�•��*,'1► �ONAL�N� attachment Figure 1, Gradation Test Results Job No. 113 284th GIPNEtech 6 /3 __..., 0, ,...(04 1 1.--1 , , , ,\., ,, , , , , „ , ‘ , , ,,, . , : 1. , , , ,, , ,. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL - _. ., } August 12, 2013. 1 i 1 Hill Construction P Attn: Gary Hill P. O. Box 1735 ilt Edwards, Colorado 81632 (osyhillcr,centur el.net) Job No. 113 284A Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Ruttum Residence, Parcel C Briar Patch, 1388 Buffehr Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Gary: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on August 8, 2013 to evaluate the materials exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Hill Construction, dated August 7, 2013. f The residence will be a single story wood frame structure over a basement level. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. The building has been designed to be supported on spread footings assuming an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf Only the southern portion of the residence is being constructed at this time. At the time of our site visit, the foundation excavation for the southern portion of the residence had been cut in multiple levels from about 3 to 15 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The materials exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted primarily of hard, fractured sandstone bedrock with relatively dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles (residual sandstone bedrock) in the shallow cut areas. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the coarse granular soils (minus 5 inch i fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 1. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils and bedrock were slightly moist to moist. I ir Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils and bedrock designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf can be used for support of the proposed residence. There is some risk of differential settlement due to the variable bearing conditions and especially at the transition from bedrock to soils bearing areas. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed materials in footing areas should be removed and the bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils or bedrock. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing 1 1 r 1 77 1 I ,,l,t,r 3,-,; c„.41 r 1 19 . ( , : ,r,„i, .-,;,.;,,,„ ,"1 )-t,-; ,,,, ' 1;. ; : -1()'. 0`,,a Hill Construction August 12, 2013 4 Page 2 elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site soil and well broken bedrock, excluding oversized rocks, as backfill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the basement walls and prevent wetting of the lower level. The underdrain should include at least 4 inches of free draining gravel below the basement floor slab. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils and well broken bedrock, or a suitable granular import material such as road base, compacted to at least 95%of standard Proctor density(SPD) at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted to at least 90% SPD (95% in pavement areas) and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. Landscape that requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, and sprinkler heads should not be located within 3 feet of the foundation. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the materials exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that materials beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface f conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface l conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data `` obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. 1 Sincerely, k it. HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEO EC -INICAL, INC. o t iri ti David A. Young, P.E. =: G3• e =31:. 32-216 DAY/ljg 1.90%��1.2-13.°`Qi*z .,e, TONAL EN0%`'A 1 attachment Figure 1, Gradation Test Results 1 Job No. 113 284A G&tech 4 i i t I