Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB13-0354NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES MWNOF ' Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B13 -0354 Project #: PRJ13 -0164 Job Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Applied.....: 08/26/2013 Location......: Issued...: 09/04/2013 Parcel No....: 210106301019 OWNER LARCH, S.A. 08/26/2013 C/O CERISOLA 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAI L CO 81657 APPLICANT BECK BUILDING COMPANY 780 NOTTINGHAM ROAD, AVON PO BOX 4030 VAI L CO 81658 License: C000003131 CONTRACTOR BECK BUILDING COMPANY 780 NOTTINGHAM ROAD, AVON PO BOX 4030 VAI L CO 81658 License: C000003131 08/26/2013 Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 ext 106 08/26/2013 Phone: 970-949-1800 Description: TEAR DOWN AND REBUILD EXISTING RETAINING WALL AT DRIVEWAY. WALL AND LANDSCAPE TO MATCH EXISTING. Occupancy: Type Construction: Valuation: $180,200.00 ...................«..,_,..........,......,,,.. ..,., >... »...............,x.... FEE SUMMARY .,....,..,...._._.,..,......................... ......,...,.................._. Building Permit ------ - - - - -> $1,447.35 Bldg Plan Check ----- - - - - -> $940.78 Use Tax Fee------------------ - - - - -> $3,404.00 Electrical Permit ---- - - - - -> $115.00 Elec Plan Check ------ - - - - -> $74.75 Restuarant Plan Review--- - - - - -> $0.00 Mechanical Permit - - - - - -> $0.00 Mech Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $0.00 Additional Fees--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Plumbing Permit --- - - - - -> $0.00 Plmb Plan Check ---- - - - - -> $0.00 Recreation Fee--------------- - - - - -> $0.00 Investigation------------------ - - - - -> $0.00 Will Call ------------------------------ > $10.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------- - - - - -> $5,991.88 Payments ------------------------------- > $5,991.88 BALANCE DUE ------------------------ > $0.00 DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 1 V OViAl CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF Permit #: B13 -0354 Owner: LARCH, S.A. combination permit-012811 Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Location: TOM OF VVE Permit #: B13 -0354 Owner: LARCH, S.A. REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Location: Item: 00010 BLDG - FOOTING Item: 00020 BLDG - Foundation /Steel Item: 00120 ELEC -Rough Item: 00190 ELEC -Final Item: 00542 PLAN -FINAL Item: 00090 BLDG -Final combination permit_012811 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOCopy Reprinted on 09 -04 -2013 at 16:11:02 09/04/2013 Statement Statement Number: R130001374 Amount: $4,979.99 09/04/201304:10 PM Payment Method: Check Init: CG Notation: ck 23018 beck building company ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B13 -0354 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101- 063 - 0101 -9 Site Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Location: Total Fees: $5,991.88 This Payment: $4,979.99 Total ALL Pmts: $5,991.88 Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description - - - - -- Current Pmts ------ - - - - -- -------------- BP - - - - -- 00100003111100 ------------------------ BUILDING PERMIT FEES 1,447.35 EP 00100003111100 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 115.00 PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 3.64 UT 11000003106000 USE TAX 40 3,404.00 WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 10.00 ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Statement Number: R130001294 Amount: $1,011.89 08/26/201304:39 PM Payment Method:Credit Crd Init: LC Notation: credit card from Frank Payne, Beck Building Cc Permit No: B13 -0354 Type: COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Parcel No: 2101- 063 - 0101 -9 Site Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Location: Total Fees: $5,991.88 This Payment: $1,011.89 Total ALL Pmts: $1,011.89 Balance: $4,979.99 ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 1,011.89 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- TOWN Of VA Project Street Address: Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Tel: 970 -479 -2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Separate applications are required for alarm & sprinkler) 805 Potato Patch Drive (Number) (Street) (Suite #) Building /Complex Name: Cerisola Residence Retaining Wall Contractor Information Business Name: Beck Building Company Business Address: PO Box 4030 City Vail State: CO Zip: 81658 Contact Name: Frank Payne Contact Phone: (970) 949 -1800 ext 106 Contact E -Mail: frank @beckbuilds.com hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- ational Building and Residential Codes and other or ' fan a Town applicable thereto. X A)� Owner /Owners Representative Signature (Required) Applicant Information Applicant Name: Frank Payne Applicant Phone: 949 -1800 ext 106 Applicant E -Mail: frank @beckbuilds.com Project Information Cerisola Residence Retaining Wall Owner Name: Parcel #: 2101- 063 -01076 (For Parcel #, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at (970- 328 -8640 or visit www.eaglecounty.uslpatie) For Office Use Only I 0' I 'Sol Fee Paid: _ Received From: Cash Check # CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # exp date: Auth # DRB #: o .I3© ) z? Building Permit #: Lot #: Block # Subdivision: Work Class: New 0 Addition 0 Alteration 0 Type of Buildin Single - Family Duplex 0 Multi - Family Commercial () Other Retaining Wall Work Type: Interior c) Exterior (F) Both O Valuation of Work Included Plans Included Work Electrical Yes O)No O)Yes Q)No 1200 Mechanical O)Yes &No O)Yes OjNo Plumbing O)Yes &No O)Yes O)No Building Q)Yes ONO (DYes ONo 178800 Value of all work being performed: $ 180000 (value based on IBC Section 109.3 & IRC Section 108.3) Electrical Square Footage /L)(p Detailed Scope and Location of Work: Tear down and re -build of existing retaining wall at drive Wall and landscaping to match existing (use additional sheet if necessary) D I} C IE � W IE Date Received: AUG 2 6 2U)J TOWN OF VAIL I ffai3-OI�`l -21 -2013 Inspection Request Reporting Page 11 - 2 Dm Vail, CID'- city Of Requested Inspect Date: Friday November 22, 2013 Site Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL A P D Information Activity: B13 -0354 Type: COMBO Sub Tpe: OTHER Type: Status: ISSUED Owner: LARCH, S.A. Occu p anc y Ue: Insp Area: Applicant: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 ext 106 Contractor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 Description: TEAR DOWN AND REBUILD EXISTING RETAINING WALL AT DRIVEWAY. WALL AND LANDSCAPE TO MATCH EXISTING. Comment: LFAMPBELLal received with 2 sets of sheet S -1. Routed to plan rack F2 and planner, Warren Campbell - Reau_ estedhs ion(s)- Rem: 542 PLAN -FINAL Requested Time: 08:00 AM equestor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY q As 'fined ATO, - Phone: 970-949-1800 fictTime x ntered By: JMONDRAGON K 1 169 <s Item: inal Requested Time: 09:30 AM Requestor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970 949 -1800 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Entered ne: JMONDRAGON K Action: Time Exp: Rem: 190 ELEC -Final Re Item: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Action: Time Exp: Inspection History Item: 10 BLDG - FOOTING hem: 20 BLDG - Foundation /Steel Item: 120 ELEC -Rough Rem: 190 ELEC -Finar Rem: 542 PLAN -FINAL Rem: 90 BLDG -Final REPT131 Requested Time: 10:30 AM Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Run Id: 14765 11-21_2U13 Inspection Request Reporting Page 11 4:12 Pm Vaal, CO -City Of Requested Inspect Date: Friday, November 22, 2013 Site Address: 805 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL A/P /D Information Activity: 1313 -0354 Type: COMBO Sub Type: OTHER Status: ISSUED Const Type: Occupancy: Use: Insp Area: Owner: LARCH, S.A. Applicant: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 ext 106 Contractor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 Description: TEAR DOWN AND REBUILD EXISTING RETAINING WALL AT DRIVEWAY. WALL AND LANDSCAPE TO MATCH EXISTING. Comment: LGPAMPBE�Lal received with 2 sets of sheet S -1. Routed to plan rack F2 and planner, Warren Campbell - Requested Insaection(s Item: 542 PLAN -FINAL Requested Time: 08:00 AM Requestor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Assigned To: GRUTHER Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 Action: Time Exp qr Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Item: 90 BLDG -Final Re Item: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Requested Time: Phone: 09:30 AM 970 - 949 -1800 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Action: Time Exp: a Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Item: Item: 190 ELEC -Final Requested Time: 10:30 AM Re BECK BUILDING COMPANY Assigned To: JMONDRAGON Phone: 970 - 949 -1800 Action: Time Exp: Entered By: JMONDRAGON K Inspection History Item: 10 BLDG - FOOTING Item: 20 BLDG-Foundation/Steel 190 ELEC- Finarh Item: Item: 542 PLAN -FINAL Item: 90 BLDG -Final REPT131 Run Id: 14765 � 1�� / DO November 7, 2013 J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 2000, Denver, CO 80203 303/860 -9021 Fax 303/860 -9537 Town of Vail Building Safety & Inspection Services Attention J. R. Mondragon Via email imondragonCa�vailgov.com Dear Mr. Mondragon: The construction of the repairs to the retaining wall at 805 Potato Patch Drive is complete. I made two observations of the construction, and inspectors from CTL/Thompson made eight inspections of the subgrade preparation and wall construction. There were a few alterations made to the design during the construction process, due to exposed existing conditions that differed somewhat from the condition assumed during design. Some construction product substitutions were also approved by me. At completion the construction, to the best of my knowledge, complies with the intent of the design. I have enclosed for your file the reports by CTL /Thompson and by me, a memo summarizing product approvals, and a copy of the drawing with the pertinent revisions marked in red. Sincerely yours, J. R. HARRIS & COMPANY RG S e 'Q'�.Q,Fi �`� u• *; 'ilia Jr Cb" James Robert Harris, P.E., Ph.D. Copy: Pedro Cerisola Frank Payne James Robert Harris, P.E., S.E., Ph.D., NAE Gene R. Stevens, P.E., S.E. G. Brent Norris, P.E. Frederick R. Rutz, P.E., Ph.D. Kenneth W. Cobb, P.E., S.E. Donald C. Carroll, P.E. J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 2000, Denver, CO 80203 303/860 -9021 Fax 303/860 -9537 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION REPORT Date, Time: October 7, 2013, 12:30 p.m. — 1:30 p.m. Project: Cerisola Retaining Wall Repair Job No: 2674 Client: Dealers Choice Denarius Contractor: Beck Building Co. Conditions: 65 deg F, clear, light breeze Report by: Jim Harris Present: Frank Payne, Beck Building Co. Distribution: All present plus Pedro Cerisola, Mark Mueller STATUS: The reconstruction of the existing Phase I wall veneer was complete in the structural sense. The remaining work includes control of surface water at the top of the Phase II wall, topsoil at the top of the entire wall, replacement of driveway pavers, and staining the face of the wall. OBSERVATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND DIRECTIONS: 1. The new grate had been placed at the top of one of the existing vertical drains above the Phase II wall. The drain grate configuration was satisfactory. ACTION: I recommended that Frank wrap the existing openings in the sidewall of the drains with a filter fabric (the fabric on site is satisfactory) prior to placing the final flow fill layer to direct the water to the drains. 2. Frank requested approval to make the west end of the flow fill a high point (effectively a dam) to limit the amount of water that would cascade down the steeply sloping backfill where the wall turns to the south. I concurred. 3. Frank has discussed the covering over the new flowfill with a waterproofing subcontractor, who may suggest a liquid applied membrane in lieu of the 60 mil plastic used at the subterranean drain. I requested that a product specification be sent for my review before making the change; I expect that a liquid applied product will be satisfactory. ACTION: Submit the proposed alternative membrane product above the Phase II wall. 4. The concrete backfill at the easternmost end of the wall has an irregular surface that traps water in some locations. ACTION: Remove the high spots in the concrete and then cover with flowfill that slopes downward to the west, so that excess surface water drains into the gravel backfill and then eventually to the buried drain line. James Robert Harris, P.E., S.E., Ph.D., NAE Gene R. Stevens, P.E., S.E. G. Brent Norris, P.E. Frederick R. Rutz, P.E., Ph.D. Kenneth W. Cobb, P.E., S.E. Donald C. Carroll. P.E. J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Cerisola Retaining Wall October 7, 2013 page 2 5. The gravel backfill over the portion of the new drain lines at the base of the Phase II wall had been placed and compacted. The tubes for the snow melt system were exposed, as was the edge of the welded wire fabric in the existing sand bed. ACTION: Cover the gravel along the drain with the filter fabric before placing the sand bed for the driveway pavers. It is not necessary to place new welded wire fabric in the sand bed for this portion of the driveway, except where it is desired to use the wire to maintain the position of the heating tubes. The sharp ends of the existing wires should be cut where they could rub on the heating tubes. 6. The preparation for staining the block was discussed. Frank will have a specialty subcontractor look at the condition to decide if pressure washing is necessary; it may take a long time for the wall to adequately dry if pressure washing is employed. 7. Frank inquired about a completion letter and an updated drawing. ACTION: Harris will prepare a completion letter to Pedro Cerisola with copies to Frank and to the Town of Vail. These reports and the CTL/Thompson reports will be attached, as will an as -built drawing. Compaction Test Report CLIENT J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC. 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 CTL I THOMPSON DATE. 0912511.3 PROJECT NUMBER: CT15655+R -QOn Phase: 4555 REPORT NUMBER. 8 SHEET: OF 1 SUBJECT! CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO RETAINING WALL RECONSTRUCTION TEST NO. LOCATION DEPTH TEST LABORATORY FIELD COM- SOIL TYPE MAX OMC°° DRY MCA° FEET TYPE DENSITY DENSITY PACTION PCF PCF NO TESTS PERFORMED SPECIFICATIONS %Or' MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN TO OF OPTIMUM 1 .'PE OF COMPACTION EOUIPMENT ANC NO OF UNITS MOISTURE ADDED BY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EOUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS; THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED, TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES PROGRESS REPORT THE CONTRACTOR WAS IN THE PROCESS OF COMPLETING THE WALL RECONSTRUCTION AND PLACING THE CAP STONES. IT WAS SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR TO PLACE A LAYER OF STRATA GRID AT APPROXIMATELY 75 TO 85 FEET WEST OF THE EAST END OF THE WALL BELOW THE SECOND BLOCK FROM THE TOP OF THE WALL AS PER DETAIL #2. STRATA GRID WAS 6 FOOT LONG. BLOCK WAS REMOVED AND STRATA GRID WAS INSTALLED. WALL CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETED TODAY. 11 IN O'JR OPINION, kILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICAI "ED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO -iS) 11 IN OJR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEFT SPECIFICATIONS AS -INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO {S} OBSERVATION ❑ TIME, M✓ PERIODIC, ON CAL: BASIS; � ADVISEAOCTOP�'S OR CLIENT'S REFRESENTATlVE FOREMAN WITH MILLER SANDON THIBAULT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CTLITHCMPSON. INC. I � CD APPROVED BY JOH BR CH MANAGER/ PR CIPAL 234 Center Dr. I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 Phone: 970-945-28091 Fax: 970 -945 -7411 Compaction Test Report CLIENT: J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC. 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 Mug .� • • ,, •� f ►1 n /1 n n 11 n w T r n DATE. 09/24113 PROJECT NUMBER: CT15658 O()Q Phase: 455 REPORT NUMBER: 7 SHEET: 1 OF i SUBJECT: CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO RETAINING WALL RECONSTRUCTION TEST NO. LOCATfON DEPTH TEST LABORATORY FIELD COM- SOIL TYPE MAX OMC °° DRY MC THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR FEET TYPE DENSITY THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES DENSITY PACTION PCF PCIF NO TESTS PERFORMED PROGRESS REPORT BLOCK PLACEMENT CONTINUES. THE CONTRACTOR ANTICIPATES COMPLETION TOMORROW, SEPTEMBER 25, 2013. ❑ IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MFETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR DSSEPVA —IONS AND TEST NO.(S) ❑ IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTICN DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY CUP OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO (S) OBSERVOATION ❑ TIME, ❑✓ PERIOD'C, ON CALL 9ASIS, AOOVIyR�CTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE HENRY WITH K DAN DOWNING CTLITHOMPSON, INC. -1ELD REPRESENTATIVE AP-ROVED BY JOHN ECHLING, P.E. BRANCH MANAGER! PRI CIPAL 234 Center Dr. I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 I Phone: 970- 945 -2809 1 Fax; 970. 945 -7411 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF SPECIFICATIONS: %of MAXIMUM OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS MOISTURE WITHIN TO °a OF OPTIMUM SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TYPE OF COMPACTION EOUIPMFNT AND NO. OF UNITS TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. MOISTURE ADDED BY THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS PROGRESS REPORT BLOCK PLACEMENT CONTINUES. THE CONTRACTOR ANTICIPATES COMPLETION TOMORROW, SEPTEMBER 25, 2013. ❑ IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MFETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR DSSEPVA —IONS AND TEST NO.(S) ❑ IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTICN DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY CUP OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO (S) OBSERVOATION ❑ TIME, ❑✓ PERIOD'C, ON CALL 9ASIS, AOOVIyR�CTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE HENRY WITH K DAN DOWNING CTLITHOMPSON, INC. -1ELD REPRESENTATIVE AP-ROVED BY JOHN ECHLING, P.E. BRANCH MANAGER! PRI CIPAL 234 Center Dr. I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 I Phone: 970- 945 -2809 1 Fax; 970. 945 -7411 Compaction Test Report CLIENT J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC. 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 CTL ( THOMPSON DATE: o4/ 411 PROJECT NUMBER CT1 S8,5,$ -OOO Phase: 4555 REPORT NUMBER. G SHEET._ OF �- SUBJECT` CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO BLOCK WALL REPAIR TEST NO. LOCATION DEPTH FEET TEST TYPE LABORATORY FIELD COM- PACTION „ SOIL TYPE MAX DENSITY PCF OMC *� DRY DENSITY PCF MC% NO TESTS PERFORMED SPECIFICATIONS °o OF MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN TO % OF OPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS' MOISTURE ADDED BY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED, TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS, THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES PROGRESS REPORT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL FOOTING EXCAVATION WAS RECOMPACTED FROM 5 TO 18 FEET WEST OF THE EAST END OF THE WALL PRIOR TO PLACING THE 3/4 INCH ROCK. THE CONTRACTOR WILL ALTERNATE BETWEEN COMPACT AND STANDARD BLOCK EAST OF THE TIE -BACK PANELS TO THE EAST END OF THE WALL FOR TWO REASONS; 1) NOT ENOUGH DISTANCE TO ACHIEVE THE 4 FOOT GRID LENGTH AND 2) TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF THE DRAIN BETWEEN THE BLOCK AND THE CONCRETE BACKFILL. WHERE CONCRETE IS USED AS BACKFILL THE CELLS OF THE BLOCK WILL ALSO BE FILLED WITH CONCRETE. A LAYER OF WASHED ROCK WILL BE PLACED ABOVE THE DRAIN PIPE TO KEEP THE DRAIN IN PLACE AND NOT BE CRUSHED BY THE CONCRETE BACKFILL. STANDARD BLOCKS WILL START TO BE PLACED AT ROWS 3 - 4, BETWEEN THE TIE -BACK PANELS AND THE CONCRETE BACKFILL. WASHED ROCK IS BEING COMPACTED. IN OUR OP.NION, FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPEC!FICATONS AS INDICATED BY Or,P OBBERVATIONS AND TEST NO IS; IN OUR OPINICt..N, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECI= ICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OUSERVATIUNS AND TEST N0.(S) SCOPE OF FULL b OR CLIENT'S nEPR._SENTAT'VE ODSERVAT.ON ❑TIME, J✓, PERIODIC, ON CALL OASIS. Q CONTRACTOR " ADVISE) HENRY WITH - SANDON THIBAULT B FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CTLITHOMPSON, INC. CD APPROVED eY JOHN HL G, P.E. BRA H MANAGER/ PRI IPAL 234 Center Dr. I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 Phone: 970 -946 -2809 I Fax: 970.945 -7411 Compaction Test Report CLIENT J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC. 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 Ir CTL ` THOMPSON IIIIIII-My DATE: 09/21/1.14 PROJECT NUMBER: CT15fiSS.DOn Phase: 455 REPORT NUMBER. 5 SHEET: I OF i_ SUBJECT: CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO BLOCK WALL REPAIR TEST NO, LOCATION , DEPTH TEST LABORATORY FIELD COM• SOIL TYPE MAX OMC °° DRY MC'° FEET TYPE DENSITY DENSITY FACTION PCF PCF g; NO TESTS PERFORMED SPECIFICATIONS: °; OF MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN TO 10 OF OPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS MOISTURE ADDED BY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO, OF UNITS: THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTWE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS, THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES PROGRESS REPORT THE LAST 25 FEET OF THE WALL EXCAVATION WAS COMPLETED TODAY (0 TO 25 FEET WEST OF DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE). NATIVE SOILS AND DRIVEWAY FILL WAS RE- DENSIFIED USING A JUMPING JACK COMPACTOR. ROCK WAS CROWED INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION TO STABILIZE THE SOILS AT FOOTING ELEVATION. WALL CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED. THE SECOND LAYER OF BLOCK WAS ATTACHED TO THE TIE -BACK PANELS, FROM 25 TO 45 FEET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. THE GEO MEMBRANE LINER BELOW THE DRAIN PIPE WAS INSTALLED. THE DRAIN PIPE WAS WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC, 1 INCH GALVANIZED STRAP WAS USED TO ATTACH STRATA GRID TO THE TIE -BACK PANELS. IT WAS SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR NOT TO MIX SOILS INTO THE RE -USED WASHED ROCK, WHEN EXCAVATING BACK TO ACHIEVE THE 4 FOOT LONG GRID LENGTH, BETWEEN THE END OF THE TIE -BACK PANELS TO THE START OF THE CONCRETE BACKFILL. IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR TO GET GUIDANCE FROM J. R. HARRIS ON HOW TO CONSTRUCT THE LAST 5 FEET OF BLOCK WALL AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE, DUE TO THE GUARD RAIL POST HAVING BEEN CAST INTO THE CONCRETE BACKFILL M IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY O'UR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO (S) IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OB5ERVATI0NS AND TEST NO (S) SCOPE OBSERVA 10N TIME a✓ PERIOn =C ON CALL BASIS, a CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATVE ADVSED FOREMAN WITH _ LER SANDON THIBAULT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CTLIThompson Inc. CD APPROVED BY JO MECHLING, P.E. BRANCH MANAGER 22 Lipan Street I Denver, Colorado 80223 1 Phone: 303. 825 -0777 1 Fax: 303 -893 -1568 Compaction Test Report CLIENT. J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC, 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 CTL ( THOMPSON DATE: _ 0917(111-111 PROJECT NUMBER: CT1565A.nnn Phase: 455 REPORT NUMBER: 4 SHEET: 1- OF SUBJECT: CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO BLOCK WALL REPAIR TEST NO. LOCATION DEPTH FEET TYPE LABORATORY COM- FACTION SOIL TYPE DENSTY NSI OMC11 7DENSITY 1 BELOW NO TESTS PERFORMED 5U5139ADE SPECIFICATIONS: °o OF MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN TO °o OF OPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS' 1) WACKER JUMPING JACK MOISTURE ADDED BY NATURAL TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES 1) BOBCAT PROGRESS REPORT THE CONTRACTOR WAS BUILDING THE NEW BLOCK WALL DURING THIS FIRST SITE VISIT. TWO TO SIX LAYERS OF BLOCK HAVE BEEN PLACED. A LAYER OF REUSED WASHED ROCK WAS PLACED BELOW AND BEHIND THE NEW BLOCK WALL. JIM HARRIS WITH J. R. HARRIS AND COMPANY WAS INFORMED THAT THE WASHED ROCK BEING REUSED WAS NOT AS CLEAN AS WHEN ORIGINALLY PLACED. THE CONTRACTOR USED 1 INCH GALVANIZED STRAP WRAPPED WITH STRATA GRID AND ATTACHED IT TO THE FIBERGLASS PINS OF THE BLOCK. THE BOTTOM AND SECOND LAYERS OF BLOCK WAS ATTACHED TO THE TIE -BACK PANELS WHERE ELEVATIONS PERMITTED. FILTER FABRIC WAS RE- EXPOSED AROUND THE DRAIN PIPE AND LAPPED FOR THE NEXT SECTION. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT TWO THREADS OF FABRIC BE PLACED IN FRONT OF STEEL PINES, IN CASE 1 THREAD BROKE, IF IT DOES NOT AFFECT VISUAL APPEARANCE. A NON PERMEABLE LINER WAS PLACED BELOW THE DRAIN PIPE AND WAS ATTACHED TO THE TIEBACK PANELS, LOOPED UNDER THE DRAIN PIPE AND EXTENDED UP TO THE HEIGHT OF THE TOP OF THE FIRST LAYER OF BLOCK. NATIVE SOILS WERE EXPOSED BETWEEN 25 TO 45 FEET WEST OF THE EAST END OF THE WALL, ROCK WAS CROWDED INTO THE NATIVE SOILS FOR STABILIZATION, BECAUSE THE NATIVE SOILS WERE MOIST. IN OUR OPINION, THE CROWDING OF ROCK APPEARED TO STABILIZE THE SOILS, THE USE OF ALL APPROVED WALL COMPONENTS WAS CONFIRMED (AS PER CONSTRUCTION MEMO DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 BY J. R. HARRIS AND COMPANY). IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION MFETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO (S) n IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S) SCOPE OF a FULL © pER10DiC. ON CALL. BASIS, Q CONTRACTOR'S OR C-!ENT'S REPRESENTATIVE OBSERVATION. TIME ADVISED HENRY WITH SANDON THIBAULT K FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CTLITHOMPSON, INC, e CD APPROVED av JOH ECHLING, P.E. BR CH MANAGER 234 Center Dr. I Glenwood Springs, CO 8 1601 1 Phone: 970 -945 -2809 1 Fax: 970.945 -7411 Compaction Test Report CLIENT J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC. 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 Opal NCORPORATED DATE: ngij gf1 i PROJECT NUMBER; CT156SS -nnn Phase: 455 REPORT NUMBER; 3 SHEET_ OF SUBJECT: CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO BLOCK WALL REPAIR TEST NO. LOCATION I DEPTH TEST LABORATORY FIELD COM- SOIL TYPE MAX OMC% DRY MC% FEET TYPE DENSITY DENSITY PACTION PCF PCF NO TESTS PERFORMED SPECIFICATIONS: °6 OF MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN TO % OF OPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: 1) JUMPING JACK MOISTURE ADDED BY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS: THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS. THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES FHUUHFSS REPORT THE CONTRACTOR HAD TO REMOVE AN ADDITIONAL 6 TO 8 INCHES OF WET SUBGRADE SOILS BELOW THE WALL BETWEEN 45 TO 90 FEET WEST OF THE EAST END OF THE WALL AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. NATIVE SOILS WERE EXPOSED THROUGHOUT THE EXCAVATION. ROCK WAS CROWDED INTO THE MOIST NATIVE SOILS TO STABILIZE THE SOILS IN THE AREA INDICATED ABOVE, IN OUR OPINION, THE SUBGRADE APPEARED TO BE STABLE AFTER CROWDING THE ROCK. M IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO IS? ID IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION GOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO (S) SCOPE OF a FULL Q PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS: CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE FRANK WITH BECK 3RYAN WITH MILLER OBSERVATION: TIME; ADVISED SANDON THIBAULT /F'� FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CTLIThompson Inc. CD APPROVED BY JO C ' BFVAANCH MANAGER 7 22 Lipan Street I Denver, Colorado 80223 1 Phone: 303 - 825 -0777 1 Fax: 303 -893 -1568 J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 2000, Denver, CO 80203 303/860 -9021 Fax 303/860 -9537 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION REPORT Date, Time: October 7, 2013, 12:30 p.m. — 1:30 p.m. Project: Cerisola Retaining Wall Repair Job No: 2674 Client: Dealers Choice Denarius Contractor: Beck Building Co. Conditions: 65 deg F, clear, light breeze Report by: Jim Harris Present: Frank Payne, Beck Building Co. Distribution: All present plus Pedro Cerisola, Mark Mueller STATUS: The reconstruction of the existing Phase I wall veneer was complete in the structural sense. The remaining work includes control of surface water at the top of the Phase II wall, topsoil at the top of the entire wall, replacement of driveway pavers, and staining the face of the wall. OBSERVATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND DIRECTIONS: 1. The new grate had been placed at the top of one of the existing vertical drains above the Phase II wall. The drain grate configuration was satisfactory. ACTION: I recommended that Frank wrap the existing openings in the sidewall of the drains with a filter fabric (the fabric on site is satisfactory) prior to placing the final flow fill layer to direct the water to the drains. 2. Frank requested approval to make the west end of the flow fill a high point (effectively a dam) to limit the amount of water that would cascade down the steeply sloping backfill where the wall turns to the south. I concurred. 3. Frank has discussed the covering over the new flowfill with a waterproofing subcontractor, who may suggest a liquid applied membrane in lieu of the 60 mil plastic used at the subterranean drain. I requested that a product specification be sent for my review before making the change; I expect that a liquid applied product will be satisfactory. ACTION: Submit the proposed alternative membrane product above the Phase II wall. 4. The concrete backfill at the easternmost end of the wall has an irregular surface that traps water in some locations. ACTION: Remove the high spots in the concrete and then cover with flowfill that slopes downward to the west, so that excess surface water drains into the gravel backfill and then eventually to the buried drain line. James Robert Harris, P.E., S.E., Ph.D., NAE Gene R. Stevens, P.E., S.E. G. Brent Norris, P.E. Frederick R. Rutz, P.E., Ph.D. Kenneth W. Cobb, P.E., S.E. Donald C. Carroll, P.E. J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Cerisola Retaining Wall October 7, 2013 page 2 5. The gravel backfill over the portion of the new drain lines at the base of the Phase II wall had been placed and compacted. The tubes for the snow melt system were exposed, as was the edge of the welded wire fabric in the existing sand bed. ACTION: Cover the gravel along the drain with the filter fabric before placing the sand bed for the driveway pavers. It is not necessary to place new welded wire fabric in the sand bed for this portion of the driveway, except where it is desired to use the wire to maintain the position of the heating tubes. The sharp ends of the existing wires should be cut where they could rub on the heating tubes. 6. The preparation for staining the block was discussed. Frank will have a specialty subcontractor look at the condition to decide if pressure washing is necessary; it may take a long time for the wall to adequately dry if pressure washing is employed. 7. Frank inquired about a completion letter and an updated drawing. ACTION: Harris will prepare a completion letter to Pedro Cerisola with copies to Frank and to the Town of Vail. These reports and the CTL/Thompson reports will be attached, as will an as -built drawing. J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 2000, Denver, CO 80203 303/860 -9021 Fax 303/860 -9537 CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM Date: September 20, 2013 Project: Cerisola Retaining Wall Job No: 2674 Client: Dealers Choice Denarius Contractor: Beck Building Co. Subject: Submittals and Questions by Miller Wall Co. Distribution: Beck, Miller, Pedro Cerisola, Mark Mueller, CTL /Thompson Geogrid submittals: StrataGrid SG150, SG200, SG350, SG500, SG550, SG600, SG700 are all APPROVED Miraf Miragrid 3XT, 8XT, l OXT are all APPROVED Note, StrataGrid SG200 is the product that will be used on the project. Geomembrane for the drain liner: Lange PVC30 is APPROVED. Request to Substitute 16 gage x F /a" coiled Simpson strap for the 1/4" x 1" steel bar at detail 4/S 1: APPROVED with the additional change that the fastener spacing be changed from 12" to 6". Request to Substitute power driven pins for the screws in detail 4/S 1: APPROVED Request to Substitute Keystone "Standard" units for the Keystone "Compac" units east of the east end of the precast wall panels: APPROVED These changes will be incorporated into the drawing and a revised edition will be issued. James Robert Harris, P.E., S.E., Ph.D., NAE Gene R. Stevens, P.E., S.E. G. Brent Norris, P.E. Frederick R. Rutz, P.E., Ph.D. Kenneth W. Cobb, P.E., S.E. Donald C. Carroll, P.E. Compaction Test Report CLIENT J.R. HARRIS AND COMPANY, INC. 1775 SHERMAN STREET SUITE 2000 DENVER CO 80203 Is MIN ORPORATED DATE 0A/2511 R PROJECT NUMBER: CT156F$.000 Phase: 455 REPORT NUMBER. 8 SHEET 1 OF SUBJECT: CERISOLA RESIDENCE - RETAINING WALL 805 POTATO PATCH VAIL, CO RETAINING WALL RECONSTRUCTION TEST NO. LOCATION DEPTH TEST TYPE LABORATORY FIELD COM- SOIL TYPE MAX pENSITY OMC °; DRY MCA° FEET DENSITY PACTION PCF PCF % NO TESTS PERFORMED SPECIFICATIONS' % MAXIMUM MOISTURE WITHIN TO °e OF OPTIMUM TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS MOISTURE ADDED BY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO. OF UNITS, THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE, WE HAVE RELIED UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED. TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS, THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES THE CONTRACTOR WAS IN THE PROCESS OF COMPLETING THE WALL RECONSTRUCTION AND PLACING THE CAP STONES. IT WAS SUGGESTED TO THE CONTRACTOR TO PLACE A LAYER OF STRATA GRID AT APPROXIMATELY 75 TO 85 FEET WEST OF THE EAST END OF THE WALL BELOW THE SECOND BLOCK FROM THE TOP OF THE WALL AS PER DETAIL #2. STRATA GRID WAS 6 FOOT LONG. BLOCK WAS REMOVED AND STRATA GRID WAS INSTALLED. WALL CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETED TODAY. ❑ IN OUR OPINION, =ILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AN[) TEST NO {S) IN OJR OPINION, =ILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS NDICATEC BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO f5} SCOPE OF FULL CONTRACTOR'S OBSERVATION ❑ TIME OR C�IEN "5 REFRESENTATIVE , ❑✓, PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS: ❑ ADVISED ,FOREMAN WITH _ SANDON THIBAULT HFLC REPRESENTATIVE CD MILLER CTLiTHCMPSON, INC. APPROVED E' JOH BR CH MANAGER/ PR CIPAL 234 Center Dr. I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 Phone: 970-945-28091 Fax: 970- 945 -7411 J.R. HARRIS & COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 2000, Denver, CO 80203 303/860 -9021 Fax 303/860 -9537 November 7, 2013 Town of Vail Building Safety & Inspection Services Attention J. R. Mondragon Via email lmondragonCW-vailgov.com Dear Mr. Mondragon: The construction of the repairs to the retaining wall at 805 Potato Patch Drive is complete. I made two observations of the construction, and inspectors from CTL/Thompson made eight inspections of the subgrade preparation and wall construction. There were a few alterations made to the design during the construction process, due to exposed existing conditions that differed somewhat from the condition assumed during design. Some construction product substitutions were also approved by me. At completion the construction, to the best of my knowledge, complies with the intent of the design. I have enclosed for your file the reports by CTL /Thompson and by me, a memo summarizing product approvals, and a copy of the drawing with the pertinent revisions marked in red. Sincerely yours, J. R. HARRIS & COMPANY ° Q F0 0. f 11f James Robert Harris, P.E., Ph.D. Copy: Pedro Cerisola Frank Payne James Robert Harris, P.E., S.E., Ph.D., NAE Gene R. Stevens, P.E., S.E. G. Brent Norris, P.E. Frederick R. Rutz, P.E., Ph.D. Kenneth W. Cobb, P.E., S.E. Donald C. Carroll, P.E.