Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
B13-0456 PROJECT MANUAL.pdf
Triumph Custom Homes www.triumphdev.com ld I '13_ - i - I i i.• - t 11 _ _ .r i. Resnick Residence 1027 Ptarmigan Road A ' Building permit submittal 10-10-2013 at C 0 NO. 77 F �d AR � P.970.479.9990 12 Vail Road,Suite 700,Vail,CO 81657 Triumph Custom Homes www.triumphdev.com October 10, 2013 Resnick Residence— Project Manual Table of Contents 1. Plat Correction Approval 2. DRB Approval Action Form 3. Design Changes Since DRB Approval 4. U Value Analysis, 2013 5. Special Inspection —Agreement with Ground Engineering 6. Special Inspection —Special Inspection &Testing Agreement 7. Special Inspection —Special Inspection &Testing Schedule 8. Asbestos—Testing Report 9. Asbestos— Final Air Clearance 10. ResCheck Report 11. Lightning Protection 12. Soils Report— Initial 2 Borings 13. Soils Report—3rd Boring & Dry Well Detail P.970.479.9990 12 Vail Road,Suite 700,Vail,CO 81657 ql� TOWN FWL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 tel: 970-479-2138 fax: 970-479-2452 web: www.vailgov.com Project Name: RESNICK PLAT CORRECTION Application Type: SFPlat ADM Number: ADM130012 Parcel: 2101-092-0900-6 Project Description: PLAT CORRECTION Participants: OWNER RESNICK, ERIC & SARA 08/09/2013 493 BEAVER DAM ROAD VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT RESNICK, ERIC & SARA 08/09/2013 493 BEAVER DAM ROAD VAIL CO 81657 Project Address: 1027 PTARMIGAN RD VAIL Location: Legal Description: Lot: 2 Block: 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE 7 Comments: SEE CONDITIONS BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: 08/28/2013 Meeting Date: Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Planner: Joe Batcheller DRB Fee Paid: $100.00 Design Review Beard ACTION FORM Department of Community Development TOR ' 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 OF tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452. 00WAITY web: www.vailgov.com Project Name: DRB NEW CONSTRUCTION DRB Number: DRB130380 Project Description: CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME. Participants: OWNER RESNICK, ERIC &SARA 08/26/2013 493 BEAVER DAM ROAD VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT TRIUMPH DEVELOPMENT 08/26/2013 Phone: 303-475-4413 12 VAIL ROAD STE 700 VAIL CO 81657 Project Address: 1027 PTARMIGAN RD VAIL Location: Legal Description: Lot: 2 Block: 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE 7 Parcel Number: 2101-092-0900-6 Comments: See Conditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Kjesbo Action: APPROVED Second By: Gillete Vote: 4-0-0 Date of Approval: 08/18/2013 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 (PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3: APPEALS. Cond: 202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Joe Batcheller DRB Fee Paid: $650.00 Triumph Custom Homes www.triumphdev.com Design Changes Since DRB Approval Overall Changes - Lower roof elevations over master wing, Eric's office, and Allie's room 4" - Added skylight above spiral stairs Sheet L-1 Landscape Plan - Revised grading at drive and around structure per building permit docs - Pool / Pool Fencing shown dashed pending on deferred approval - Pool length Reduced to 40' - Spa Enlarged to 10'x14' - Pool patio revised per new pool and spa sizes Sheet L-2 Planting Plan - Pool/Pool Fencing shown dashed pending on deferred approval Sheet A2.0 Site Plan - Pool / Pool Fencing shown dashed pending on deferred approval - New roof heights shown above master wing, Eric's office, and Allies room Sheet A3.1 Lower Level Floor Plan - Revised grading around structure per new building elevation - Pool / Pool Fencing shown dashed pending on deferred approval - Pool patio revised per new pool and spa sizes - Removed lower level BBQ Sheet A3.2 Main Level Floor Plan - Revised garage door design to remove the 3 lower glass panels and replace with copper panels - Replaced lift and slide doors at hearth room with pivot door at north elevation and a direct set widow with awning below at east elevation - Replaced lift and slide door at breakfast with (2) direct set windows - Removed trellis off of living room - Man door to garage revised to show solid copper panel below glazing to match garage doors Sheet A3.3 Upper Level Plan - Enlarged window at master bath water closet - Removed lower windows at master bath south east corner, replaced with copper panels - Moved window in master closet Sheet A3.4 Roof Plan - Roof heights revised to show new building elevation - Skylight added above spiral stair location Sheet A4.1 Elevations - Roof heights revised to show new building elevations - Removed trellis off of living room - Removed lower level BBQ - Man door to garage revised to show solid copper panel below glazing to match garage doors P.970.479.9990 12 Vail Road, Suite 400 F.970.479.0619 Vail, CO 81657 Sheet A4.2 Elevations - Roof heights revised to show new building elevations - -Removed trellis off of living room - -Enlarged window at master bath water closet - -Removed lower windows at master bath south east corner, replaced with copper panels - -Revised garage door design to remove the 3 lower glass panels and replace with copper panels Sheet A4.3 Elevations - Roof heights revised to show new building elevations - Replaced lift and slide doors at hearth room with pivot door at north elevation and a direct set widow with awning below at east elevation - Replaced lift and slide door at breakfast with (2) direct set windows www.triumphdev.com ALAN-BRADLEY WINDOWS & DOOR STm A Specialty Fenestration Company TM Window & Door U-Value Average Analysis Customer: Date: 10/9/2013 Project: 1027 Ptarmigan Road, Vail CO Glazing Type Product Type Location/Area Description Quantity Width Height U-Value Total sq Feet Sq feet X U - value 0001 awning 1 48.00 30.00 0.26 10.00 2.60 0011 awning 1 48.00 30.00 0.26 10.00 2.60 0022 awning 1 24.00 24.00 0.26 4.00 1.04 0032 awning 1 24.00 24.00 0.26 4.00 1.04 0043 lift and slide 1 168.00 108.00 0.39 126.00 49.14 0054 patio door 1 36.00 111.00 0.30 27.75 8.33 0065 awning 1 30.00 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 0076 casement 2 34.00 60.00 0.26 28.33 3.68 0087 casement 1 30.00 60.00 0.26 12.50 3.25 0097 casement 1 30.00 60.00 0.26 12.50 3.25 0098 direct set 1 73.00 60.00 0.23 30.42 7.00 0109 direct set corner 1 30.00 60.00 0.23 12.50 2.88 0109 direct set corner 1 36.00 60.00 0.23 15.00 3.45 011 72 lift and slide 1 42.00 74.00 0.39 21.58 8.42 10010 casement 2 36.00 42.00 0.26 21.00 5.46 10111 awning 2 36.00 24.00 0.26 12.00 3.12 10212 awning 1 48.00 24.00 0.26 8.00 2.08 10313 direct set 3 48.00 24.00 0.23 24.00 5.52 10414 casement 1 48.00 60.00 0.26 20.00 5.20 10515 direct set 1 78.00 84.00 0.23 45.50 10.47 10516 awning 1 78.00 36.00 0.26 19.50 5.07 10615 direct set 1 78.00 84.00 0.23 45.50 10.47 106A 17 direct set 1 78.00 84.00 0.23 45.50 10.47 10718 lift and slide 1 168.00 120.00 0.39 140.00 54.60 10820 lift and slide 1 262.00 120.00 0.39 218.33 85.15 10921 awning 1 70.00 30.00 0.26 14.58 3.79 10922 direct set 1 73.00 30.00 0.23 15.21 3.50 10923 awning 1 70.00 105.00 0.26 51.04 13.27 10924 direct set 1 73.00 105.00 0.23 53.23 12.24 110 9A direct set corner 1 37.00 30.00 0.23 7.71 1.77 110 9A direct set corner 1 36.00 30.00 0.23 7.50 1.73 110 913 direct set corner 1 37.00 105.00 0.23 26.98 6.21 110 913 direct set corner 1 36.00 105.00 0.23 26.25 6.04 11125 awning 1 36.00 30.00 0.26 7.50 1.95 11126 awning 1 75.00 30.00 0.26 15.63 4.06 11127 casement 1 44.00 93.00 0.26 28.42 7.39 111 28 direct set 1 75.00 93.00 0.23 48.44 11.14 11229 direct set trap 1 48.00 36.00 0.23 12.00 2.76 11230 direct set trap 1 75.00 36.00 0.23 18.75 4.31 11331 lift and slide 1 125.00 156.00 0.39 135.42 52.81 11432 direct set 2 78.00 36.00 0.23 39.00 8.97 11533 direct set 1 72.00 72.00 0.23 36.00 8.28 11534 casement 1 36.00 72.00 0.26 18.00 4.68 11636 direct set 1 25.00 38.00 0.23 6.60 1.52 11737 direct set trap 1 25.00 26.00 0.23 4.51 1.04 11738 direct set trap 1 56.00 31.00 0.23 12.06 2.77 11840 direct set 1 90.00 78.00 0.23 48.75 11.21 11841 direct set 1 48.00 36.00 0.23 12.00 2.76 11842 direct set 1 90.00 36.00 0.23 22.50 5.18 11851 direct set 1 48.00 78.00 0.23 26.00 5.98 11976 pivot door 1 72.00 120.00 0.39 60.00 23.40 20005 awning 1 30.00 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 20105 awning 1 30.00 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 20205 awning 1 30.00 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 20343 patio door 1 36.00 96.00 0.30 24.00 7.20 20344 awning 1 71.00 30.00 0.26 14.79 3.85 20345 direct set 1 71.00 66.00 0.23 32.54 7.48 204 9C direct set corner 1 34.00 24.00 0.23 5.67 1.30 204 9C direct set corner 1 36.00 24.00 0.23 6.00 1.38 20667 casement 1 30.00 54.00 0.26 11.25 2.93 207 9F direct set corner 1 42.00 30.00 0.23 8.75 2.01 207 9F direct set corner 1 51.00 30.00 0.23 10.63 2.44 207 9G direct set corner 1 42.00 78.00 0.23 22.75 5.23 207 9G direct set corner 1 51.00 78.00 0.23 27.63 6.35 20850 direct set 1 48.00 30.00 0.23 10.00 2.30 20867 direct set 1 48.00 72.00 0.23 24.00 5.52 20952 lift and slide 1 120.00 104.00 0.39 86.67 33.80 210 9D direct set corner 1 36.00 60.00 0.23 15.00 3.45 210 9D direct set corner 1 36.00 60.00 0.23 15.00 3.45 210 9E direct set corner 1 36.00 26.00 0.23 6.50 1.50 210 9E direct set corner 1 36.00 26.00 0.23 6.50 1.50 21153 casement 1 36.00 60.00 0.23 15.00 3.45 211 54 direct set 1 60.00 60.00 0.26 25.00 6.50 211 55 direct set 1 36.00 22.00 0.23 5.50 1.27 211 56 direct set 1 60.00 22.00 0.23 9.17 2.11 21243 patio door 1 36.00 99.00 0.30 24.75 7.43 21257 direct set 1 24.00 86.00 0.23 14.33 3.30 21278 direct set 1 24.00 19.00 0.23 3.17 0.73 21279 direct set 1 36.00 19.00 0.23 4.75 1.09 21358 direct set 1 90.00 54.00 0.23 33.75 7.76 21359 casement 1 48.00 54.00 0.26 18.00 4.68 21460 casement 1 54.00 60.00 0.26 22.50 5.85 21461 direct set trap 1 54.00 31.00 0.23 11.63 2.67 21562 direct set trap 1 72.00 20.00 0.23 10.00 2.30 21646 direct set 1 36.00 24.00 0.23 6.00 1.38 217 9K direct set corner 1 36.00 24.00 0.23 6.00 1.38 217 9K direct set corner 1 46.00 24.00 0.23 7.67 1.76 21843 patio door 1 36.00 96.00 0.30 24.00 7.20 21844 awning 1 71.00 30.00 0.26 14.79 3.85 21845 direct set 1 71.00 66.00 0.23 32.54 7.48 21863 direct set trap 1 71.00 18.00 0.23 8.88 2.04 21864 direct set trap 1 36.00 27.00 0.23 6.75 1.55 21965 direct set 1 56.00 24.00 0.23 9.33 2.15 21966 direct set 1 25.00 24.00 0.23 4.17 0.96 22040 direct set 1 90.00 78.00 0.23 48.75 11.21 22041 direct set 1 48.00 36.00 0.23 12.00 2.76 22042 direct set 1 90.00 36.00 0.23 22.50 5.18 22051 direct set 1 48.00 78.00 0.23 26.00 5.98 221 43 patio door 1 36.00 99.00 0.30 24.75 7.43 22144 awning 1 71.00 30.00 0.26 14.79 3.85 221 45 direct set 1 71.00 66.00 0.23 32.54 7.48 221 70 direct set 1 36.00 30.00 0.23 7.50 1.73 221 71 direct set 1 70.00 30.00 0.23 14.58 3.35 22250 awning 1 48.00 30.00 0.26 10.00 2.60 223 9H direct set corner 1 18.00 60.00 0.23 7.50 1.73 223 9H direct set corner 1 37.00 60.00 0.23 15.42 3.55 223 9i direct set corner 1 18.00 30.00 0.23 3.75 0.86 223 9i direct set corner 1 37.00 30.00 0.23 7.71 1.77 22314 direct set 1 48.00 60.00 0.23 20.00 4.60 22350 direct set 1 48.00 30.00 0.23 10.00 2.30 22368 casement 1 62.00 60.00 0.26 25.83 6.72 22369 direct set 1 42.00 30.00 0.23 8.75 2.01 22443 patio door 1 36.00 99.00 0.30 24.75 7.43 22470 direct set 1 36.00 30.00 0.23 7.50 1.73 225 9J direct set corner 1 24.00 30.00 0.23 5.00 1.15 225 9J direct set corner 1 63.00 30.00 0.23 13.13 3.02 22669 direct set 1 42.00 30.00 0.23 8.75 2.01 2275 awning 1 30.00 30.00 0.26 6.25 1.63 2282 awning 1 24.00 24.00 0.23 4.00 0.92 22977 skylight 1 46.00 46.00 0.49 14.69 7.20 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126 0.29 2734.76 780.27 October 7, 2013 Subject: Proposal for Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services, Resnick Residence, Vail, Colorado Proposal No. 1310-1747 Mr. Mike Foster I Triumph Custom Homes 12 Vail Road, Suite 700 Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mr. Foster, i Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. (GROUND) appreciates the opportunity to prepare a proposal to provide materials testing and special inspection services for the new construction of the Resnick Residence, located at 1027 Ptarmigan Road in Vail, Colorado. It is our understanding that our scope of work will include materials testing and special inspection services, specifically open hole evaluation, soils compaction testing, concrete testing, structural steel inspections and associated laboratory services. It is our understanding that reinforcing steel observations will be performed by the Town of Vail. Please note that the services will only be provided as scheduled by the Owner, Owner's Representative, Contractor, or applicable Subcontractors. Our rate for this work will be $55.00 per hour for an engineering technician for soils and concrete testing, $75.00 per hour for a Certified Weld Inspector (CWI), and a $10.00 trip charge for each trip to the site. An overtime rate of an additional $15.00 per hour above the hourly rate will be billed for hours over 8 per day and all hours on weekends and holidays. Review and supervision will be completed at a rate of $85.00 per hour. Lab testing if required will be completed at unit rates outlined on the attached Fee Schedule. Service Agreement/Proposal Conditions The scope addressed by this proposal does not include geotechnical engineering services, other than any specifically identified herein. Should geotechnical engineering services be requested, including but not necessarily limited to remedial earthwork/soil stabilization recommendations, groundwater evaluation, and assessment of soil suitability for specific uses, the Client/Owner/Contractor must realize additional time, exploration, evaluation/analysis, and costs likely will be incurred for such services. Such services would be provided under a separate scope and fee. Performing materials testing and observation services does not place the Consultant in the role of Geotechnical Engineer for the project, and the Consultant cannot assume that role unless specifically contracted to do so. You will be invoiced for the amount of work actually performed, so actual total cost may be more or less than the amount estimated above, The terms under which our work will be performed are outlined in the General Conditions that contain a limitation of GROUND's liability. This proposed estimate shall be valid for a period of 120 calendar days from the date of submittal. GROUND reserves the right to review and revise the proposed quantities and unit rates thereafter. The referenced "Fee Schedule" and "General Conditions" are included and are part of this proposal. We propose that our fees for any additional services be based on our hourly and unit costs in accordance with the "Fee Schedule". Also note that GROUND reserves the right to withhold data and reports until we have received a signed proposal. If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign one copy and return it to this office. ENGINEERING C©NSULTRNTS INC. 101A Airpark Drive Unit 9,Gypsum,CO 81637 Phone(970)524-0720 Fax(970)524-0721 Nvmtiv.groundeng.com Ofce Locations: Englewood Commerce City Loveland , Granby Gypsum Grand Junction Casper Resnick Residence Vail,Colorado Thank you for considering us for the materials testing and special inspection services on this project. Sincerely, GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. Chris Hutto, CET Agreed to this day of 2413 Triumph. Custom Homes, by: Print: G October 7, 2013 Proposal No. 1310-1747 Page 2 of 5 Resnick Residence Vail,Colorado GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. FEE SCHEDULE - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (2013)2013CIA MATERIAL TESTING AND SPECIAL INSPECTION Construction Materials Testing and Special inspections(Time is round trip from office to project site and return) a. Engineering Technician................................................................................................................................................................see proposal b. Senior Engineering Technician...........................................--................,....................................................................................see proposal c. Overtime(Over 8hrslday,weekends,nights after 6pm)...................................................................Personnel Hourly Rate+$15.00 per hour d. Vehicle Mileage....................................-....................................................................................................see proposal(not typically charged) e. Daily Rates(includes personnel,vehicle and equipment)............................................................................................................see proposal f. Weld Testing(MT,PT,UT),ASNT Qualified,Visual Weld Insp.,(AWS,API ON Qual,),Bolt Tension&Special Insp.................see proposal g. NDE-Weld Inspection Instrumentation-Ultra Sonic and Magnetic Particle..................................................................................$40.001day h. Trip Charge(covers vehicle and equipment)............................................................................................................. ...........see proposal LABORATORY TESTING Standard Proctor Compaction(ASTM D 698).................$90.00 Fireproofing:Thickness,Density,Adhesion...............Tech Time I Modified Proctor Compaction(ASTM D 1557).......... $100.00 Asphalt Extraction and Gradation Tests.........................$150.00 Check Point Proctor.........................................................$45.00 Special Tests/Sample P€epa€ation............--$40.00-$60.00/hour Natural Density and Moisture Content.............................$12.50 Marshall Properties: Specific Gravity(ASTM D 854)........................................$60.00 Field production sample..........................................$175.00 Aggregate Specific Gravity..............................................$60.00 Laboratory sample(3 specimenslpoint)..............$2001point Gradation Analysis(ASTM D 422) SHRP Mix Analysis SHRP Gyratory Compaction,3 points a. All Standard Sieve to#200 Sieve.........................$55.00 Field Production Sample.........................................$250.00 b. Percent Less Than#200 Sieve.............................$35.00 Laboratory Sample..................................................$300.00 c.Hydrometer Analysis,add......................................$55.00 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity(D 2041)..............$95.00 "R"-Value(ASTM D 2844)..............................................$300.00 Effect of Water on Cohesion of Compacted Atterberg Limit(ASTM D 4318)........................................$45.00 Bituminous Mixtures(D 1075)Field Production......$200.00 Sand Equivalent(ASTM D 24-19)-.--............................$95.00 Laboratory Specimens............................................$260.00 Relative Density(ASTM D 2049)...................................$200.00 Lottman Tests.............--..................................................$300.00 Clay Lumps and Friable Particles(C 142).......................$35.00 Ignition Oven Calibration.................... .........$200.00 Concrete Compression Test,Cylinders......................$14.001ea Neutron Oven Test(AC)...................................................$60.00 Flat or Elongated Particles(D 4791)................................$60.00 Coring--Asphalt......................................................$75.00/each Soil Stabilization Mixture Analysis....................................Quote Asphalt and Concrete Mixture Analysis.............................Quote Concrete Flexural Test,Beams.......................................$55.00 Soundness(ASTM C 88)...............................................$175.00 Mortar Cubes..............................................................$20.00/ea Fractured Faces Test...................................---..............$60.00 Masonry Prisms..........................................................$85.00/ea Los Angeles Abrasion Test............................................$150.00 GroutSpecimens........................................................$30.001ea pH Test.............................................................................535.00 Soil Stabilization Pucks...................--..............$250.001set of 3 Water Soluble Sulfates Test.............................................$45.00 Floor Flatness and Levelness FFIFL Testing....................Quote Uncompacted Voids Test...................... ..........$75.00 Maturity Meter...................................................................Quote Bulk Specific Gravity-Asphalt........................................ $50.00 Laboratory Technician ...................---.........$40.00-60.00/hour Permeability Moisture Coupons..............Sr.Tech Time+$35.00 per coupon a. Falling or Constant Head,2-4"Diameter...........$200.00 Relative Density(F2170)........................................$50-00/each b. Triaxial Permeability...........................................$350.00 Shotcrete Cores...................................................•......$60.00lea ENGINEERING (Covers planning and general supervision,field trips,analysis, consultation,preparation of reports,and travel time.) PrincipalEngineer...............................................................................................................................................................$125.00-$175.001hour ProjectManager....................................................................................................................................................................$85.00-$105.001hour Project Engineer,Weld Engineer or Geologist........................................................................................ ..............-..........$75.00-$95.00/hour Staff/Field Engineer.................................................................................................................................... ...........................$65.00-$75.001hour ICC Building Inspection(D.F.S.Approved).............................................................---......-.................................................$65.00-$80.001hour i CADTechnician...................................................................................................................................................................................$50.00/hour Special Consultation,Expert Testimony and Court Appearance ........................................................................................Negotiable Daily Rate MISCELLANEOUS Out-of-town living expenses,commercial travel costs,equipment rental,etc......................................................................................Cost+15% Interest charged after 30 days from invoice date.................................................................................................................................1.5%Imonth OutsideLaboratory Services.................................................................................................................................................................Cost+20% Pile Dynamic Analysis,Ground Penetrating Radar,Cross Hole Sonic Logging,Sonic Echo,Thermal Conductivity and Resistivity..........Quote MobileLaboratory.............................................................................................................................................................Quote(Project Specific) October 7, 2013 Proposal No. 1310-1747 Page 3 of 5 Resnick Residence Vail,Colorado GENERAL CONDITIONS INTENT OF SERVICES: The services and any subsequent analysis and reporting performed by the Consultant under this agreement are intended to assist the contractor, owner, and governing authorities in evaluating compliance with project specifications. It must be understood that the Consultant's tests, observations, or inspection results do not mean that Consultant is approving the work performed or materials used by the Contractor or any Subcontractors. Client acknowledges that Consultant is not responsible for the contractor's or subcontractor's compliance with regulating agencies, safety, materials, means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures of construction, nor for contractor's failure to follow recommendations or good construction practices, and that the services provided by the Consultant shall not relieve the contractor of its obligation to perform the Work in accordance with the project plans and specifications, as well as use materials that are in accordance with the plans and specifications. The observation and testing services outlined herein, or lack thereof, do not relieve the contractor, subcontractors or any other applicable trades of their responsibilities to perform their portion of this project in conformance to the project plans, specifications, and other applicable documents. Any exploration, testing, specific observations, inspection and/or analysis associated with the services will be performed by Consultant solely to fulfill the purpose of this Service Agreement and Consultant is not responsible for interpretation by others of the information developed. Client recognizes that conditions on the project site may vary from those encountered during testing and that information generated by Consultant is based solely on the information available to the Consultant at the time and location of such testing. Furthermore, the Client acknowledges that actual testing, observation, or inspection performed is likely on a very small percentage of the overall project and that as such, may not fully reflect the work performed or materials used by Project Contractors or Subcontractors. The proposed scope of services provided herein does not include engineering review of the project documents in regard to the geotechnical aspects of the project such as foundations, slabs, pavements, drains, walls, etc; nor does the proposed scope of work consist of construction management services relating to acceptance of materials, material types, or placement methodology. It is not the responsibility of the Consultant to accept or reject material placement or material types, nor to alter, amend, or revise project specifications. If required, these services can be provided under a separate scope of work. RIGHT-OF-ENTRY; Unless otherwise agreed, Client will furnish right-of-entry for Consultant to take the scheduled tests or observations. Consultant will take reasonable precautions to reduce damage to property. However, cost of restoration or damage that may result from field operations are not included in the fee unless otherwise stated, and Consultant cannot be held responsible. Any construction debris or waste generated as a result of the required testing is the responsibility of the Client and their respective Contractor or Subcontractors. SCHEDULING OF SERVICES: ALL observation and testing requests must be scheduled through our Main Office (970- 524-0720) at least 24 hours in advance of each required observation or test. Verbal test results can be provided to the Contractor/Subcontractor and/or any other entities or representatives as designated by the Client as tests are completed, and formal, typed reports can be forwarded once they have been processed and reviewed. Unless specifically scheduled through our main office for a specific testlobservation, date, and time, testing or observations may not occur. The required amount of work for materials testing depends on the Contractor's, Subcontractor's, or other Entity's scheduling of our services, as well as their production schedule. Having no control over these factors, our proposed scope of work is in general accordance to the attached Fee Schedule. The proposed scope of work is for periodic testing and observation. It is therefore important that the Client, Contractor, or Subcontractors schedule our field technicians such that: (1) Sufficient tests are conducted to comply with project specifications; and, (2) That such testing occurs at locations that are randomly distributed throughout the materials being tested. The quantity of tests provided for the various elements in the attached sheets are estimates; actual amounts of individual tests and locations are highly dependent on the Contractor's schedule and the scheduling of our field personnel (could be technicians, CWI, utility inspectors or building inspectors) by the Client, Contractor and/or Subcontractors. October 7, 2013 Proposal No. 1310-1747 Page 4 of 5 Resnick Residence Vail,Colorado INVOICES: Consultant will submit progress invoices to client monthly and a final bill upon completion of the services. Invoices will show charges for different personnel and expense classifications. Each invoice is due on presentation and is past-due thirty (30) days from invoice date. Client agrees to pay a finance charge of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, on past-due accounts. Should Consultant bring suit to recover past due payment for services rendered to Client, Consultant shall be entitled to recover all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees. REPORTS: Reports, plans and other work prepared by Consultant remain the property of Consultant until all fees for Consultant's services have been paid. Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client and his agents not paid for will be returned upon demand, and will not be used for licensing, permits, design and/or construction. FINAL LETTERS: Many governing agencies require that the Consultant provide some form of final letter at the completion of a project. Such letters are usually required to state that the project was constructed in compliance or general compliance to certain specifications, plans, or codes. As professional consulting engineers, it is not possible or reasonable to state with certainty that all work completed by others completely complied with any specification, plan, or code, and any interpretation as such is incorrect. The Consultant can only make such statements based on the best of their knowledge, their experience, as well as on the specific periodic testing and/or observations that were made and for the time they were made. Any use of the word "inspection" shall be assumed to mean "observation" in any document provided by our office that is in any way connected with this project. Such betters do not constitute any form of warranty, guarantee, or certification, expressed or implied, regardless of the wording used. It must also be understood that such testing and observation only occur when properly scheduled by the owner, owner's representatives, contractor, or subcontractors, and therefore, it is their responsibility to schedule accordingly and in a manner consistent with the project specifications and the scope of work provided herein. USE OF ELECTRONIC OR OTHER SUPPLIED DATA: Electronic documents, site plans, or other information provided to Consultant for the subject project may be used in compiling geotechnical, environmental, or construction-related reports for the subject project. It is the responsibility of the Owner or Supplier of such documents to ensure that our use does not violate any copyright or confidentiality that may be pertinent to the supplied information. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: Consultant agrees in connection with services performed under this Agreement that such services are performed with the care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time and in the same or a similar locality. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made or intended by rendition of consulting services or by furnishing oral or written reports of the findings made. Liability of Consultant or Subconsultant(s) for damages due to or arising from professional negligence, breach of contract, or any cause of action, shall be limited to the Consultant's fee. Any exploration, testing, specific observations and analysis associated with the services will be performed by Consultant solely to fulfill the purpose of this Service Agreement and Consultant is not responsible for interpretation by others of the information developed. The services we have been retained to provide consist of periodic material testing and/or observations to assist the owner, contractor, construction manager and design team members with evaluating compliance with project specifications. CORPORATE PROTECTION: It must be agreed to by all parties affiliated with this agreement that the services provided by the Consultant that are in any way connected to this project shall not connect Consultant's employees, owners, directors, or officers to any personal exposure for risks associated with any portion of this project. Therefore, and not withstanding anything to the contrary that may be contained herein or in any other document related to this project, the Client, future owners, future users, and/or any other trade or professional, agrees that as the sole and exclusive remedy for any claim, demand, or suit shall be directed and/or asserted against the Consultant, a Colorado Corporation, and not against any of GROUND's employees, owners, officers, or directors. October 7, 2013 Proposal No. 1310-1 747 Page 5 of 5 Job Name: Resnick Residence OVAO' Job Address: 1027 Ptarmigan Road Rg Permit No.; SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT (Tv applicants of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1704 of the IBC) The owner or his/her representative, on the advice of the design professional In responsible charge, shall complete, seal, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests Scheduled to the Town of Vail for review and approval. Signatures are required on both pages; photocopied or faxed signatures are acceptable, The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection Testing: 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items Ilsted.(Page 1) (IBC 1704) 2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and Inspections are to be sent directly to the Town of Vall by the Testing agency on a weekly basis. i 4. inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Town of Vail for review and approval.(Page 2) 5. The special Inspector is responsible to Immediately notify the Town of Vall Building Ofilclal In writing of any concerns and/or problems encountered, 6. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the Town of Vail approved plans for additional Inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site Is recommended to review special inspection procedures. 7. The special Inspector shall use only the Town of Vall approved drawings. 8. All special inspection field reports must be left on site for review by the Town of Vail staff prior to required inspections or re-lnspeolions. BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special Inspection agency shall submit a signed and sealed statement that all Items requiring testing and Inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those Items not tested and/or Inspected shall be noted in this statement, A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the job site for the Building Inspector's review prior to final Inspection, Acknowledge +1nt:, /1 Owner: Arta I S kSMt PVC Sign Prinl Name dale f Special Inspection GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. � Agency; Chris Hutto, Project Manager 10/07/2013 ig tore PrW Name Dale Project �,/ �, ArchlEng: ` � Si slur Print Name Data Contractor: SIgnat re Prirrl Name Dale OVAK *OF TOM SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE (IBC 1704) Project Name: Resnick Resid ce P NLI# Owner's Name: R2�r Testing Inspection ignature GROUND Engineering bonsultants, Inc. date Agency: 10/07/2013 Testing Inspection Signature Print Name Date Hereby certifies that the Testingllnspection Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and inspections during construction as checked below,to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code. Prior to final inspection, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work performed were reported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. 'Whenever any designated items on the list are ready for sampling, testing, or inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to give timely notice to the Inspection agency so that the required services may be performed. REINFORCING STEEL: UNDERPINNING: Tensile&Bend,one set per heat per tons Temporary/Permanent Inspection of Placement Inspection of Steel Fabrication Inspection of Welding Inspection of Reinforcing&Forms Epoxy Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Tiebacks MASONRY: Prelim.Acceptance Tests(Masonry Units,Wall Prisms) SOIL NAILS: Subsequent Tests(Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) Temporary Shoring Inspection of Placement and Grouting Permanent Wall CONCRETE,SHOTCRETE,GROUT AND MORTAR: STRUCTURAL STEEL: Concrete Shot Grout Mortar Sample&Test(List specific members below) Aggregate tests for design Shop Identification&Welding Inspection Suitability of aggregates Shop Ultrasonic Inspection Mix Designs Shop Radiography Test Panel X Field Welding Inspection Batch Plant Inspection X Field Bolting Inspection Cement Grab Sample X Field Ultrasonic Inspection Inspect Placing Field Radiography X Compression Tests X Metal Deck Welding Inspection X Cast Specimens FIREPROOFING. Pick-up Samples Inspection&Placement Shrinkage Bars Yield Check SOILS: X Air Check X Acceptance Tests Dry Unit weight X Moisture-Density Determination PRECAST CONCRETE: X Field Density Reinforcing Tests Drilled Piers Inspection of Reinforcing Placement Deep Foundation Tendon Tests Inspection of Tendon Placement STRUCTURAL WOOD: Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Fabrication Inspection of Concrete Batching Inspection of Truss Joint Fabrication Inspection of Panel Attachment&Inserts Sample&Test Components Compression Tests Inspection of Glu Lam Fabrication Inspection of StressirngFrransfer SMOKE CONTROL: PILING, CAISSONS, CAPS,TIES: Inspection of Reinforcing Placement SPECIAL CASES: Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching SPECIAL INSPECTION: Seismic Resistance Specify other tests, inspections or special instructions required. Wind Requirements Consulting Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report 1027 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, Colorado 81657 Presented To: Mr. Travis Coggin Triumph Development travis @triumphdev.com Performed &Prepared By: Mr. Steve Shurtliff DS Consulting, Inc. PO Box 6864 Avon, CO 81620 (303) 378-1544 4 Project Details: . 4 " °fi_Sw Project Number: 7855 Conducted: June 18, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Scope of Work 3.0 Site Description 4.0 Certifications 5.0 Inspection, Sampling&Analytical Procedures 5.1 Inspection Procedures 5.2 Sampling Procedures 5.3 Analytical Procedures 6.0 Homogeneous Areas 6.1 Material Friability 6.2 Material Classifications 6.3 Material Conditions 6.4 Sample Quantities 7.0 Overview of Findings 8.0 Conclusion &Recommendations 9.0 Asbestos Abatement&Demolition Requirements 10.0 Major&Minor Asbestos Spill Response Actions 11.0 Disclaimer&Limitations APPENDIX A Analytical Data 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction On June 18, 2013, Mr. Steve Shurtliff with DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) conducted a full-building asbestos inspection and collected asbestos bulk-samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) throughout the interior and exterior of the single-family residence located at 1027 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, Colorado. The purpose of the limited inspection was to identify and sample potentially hazardous friable and non- friable ACM that may be impacted by upcoming demolition activities. All suspect asbestos-containing materials in and on the residence were sampled and analyzed for asbestos. These materials included the exterior stucco and window caulking as well as interior drywall, sheet vinyl flooring, vinyl cove base, carpet, CMU block, and pipe wrap. Of the sampled materials, the following contain asbestos greater than 1% Chrysotile, or assumed to contain greater than 1% Chrysotile: The white, smooth textured drywall found in the exterior wood closet outside the main front door The white, slightly textured drywall found throughout the entire residence The faux brick sheet vinyl flooring found in the shared hallway bathroom and the bedroom bathroom The wallpapered drywall in the entry bedroom and the shared hallway bathroom The window caulk of the main front, south window under the "1027' moniker 2.0 Scope of Work The scope of the full-building inspection included all interior and exterior areas of the residence. No out- building on the property was not included in the scope of the inspection. The full-building asbestos inspection did constitute a full-building inspection and does fulfill the asbestos inspection requirements for structures that are to be demolished. 3.0 Site Description The residence is a multi-level, single-family residence without a garage. No out-buildings were noted during the inspection. 4.0 Certifications The asbestos inspection and bulk-sampling was conducted by Mr. Steve Shurtliff with DSC. DSC is a Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) certified Asbestos Consulting Firm, Registration No. 14912. Mr. Shurtliff is a CDPHE certified Building Inspector; having certification number 15413. 5.0 Inspection, Sampling & Analytical Procedures 5.1 Inspection Procedures The limited asbestos inspection was conducted by an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and CDPHE certified Building Inspector. The inspection procedures included identifying and sampling suspect ACM within the pre-defined areas, submitting samples to an accredited laboratory for analysis, 3 classifying the materials and assessing their condition, and compiling a final report detailing the inspection and the analytical results of the bulk-samples. 5.2 Sampling Procedures Statistically random bulk-samples representative of the suspect ACM of each homogeneous area were collected according to the guidelines published as EPA Final Rule: Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 USC, Sections 2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 763 and CDPHE Regulation Number 8, Part B -Asbestos (Reg. 8). DSC has collected the appropriate number of bulk-samples to meet all regulatory requirements for the classification and quantity of each homogeneous area. Some minor destructive sampling was conducted; however, walls, columns and perimeter pipe chases were not broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM. It should be noted that additional ACM might be located in these and other inaccessible areas. 5.3 Analytical Procedures All asbestos bulk-samples were analyzed by a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for asbestos content (see Appendix B for laboratory report). The percentage of asbestos within each individual bulk-sample can vary depending on sample location, homogeneity of the material, and the type of application. Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos must be considered positive for asbestos greater than 1% unless it is re-analyzed utilizing the point-count method and verified to be less than 1%. Materials containing less than 1% asbestos are not regulated by CDPHE Regulation 8, Part B -Asbestos. However, all demolition/abatement activities should be performed following the applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. This would include, but not limited to, the appropriate asbestos training for the type of material being removed/disturbed as well as having a properly trained supervisor onsite, using wet removal methods, wearing adequate personal protective equipment (HEPA-filtered particulate respirators), medical surveillance of workers, personal-exposure air monitoring, area air monitoring in occupied buildings, etc. There may also be landfill disposal requirements for these materials, depending on the facility. DSC recommends that all demolition/renovation areas involving any amount of asbestos be subjected to visual inspections and a final clearance air testing by a CDPHE-certified Air Monitoring Specialist (AMS) after the work has been completed, but before any containments are dismantled and the area is reoccupied. 6.0 Homogeneous Areas A Homogeneous Area (HA) includes materials that are uniform in appearance, color, texture and date of application. The asbestos content of the bulk-samples collected within a homogeneous area can be applied to the entire homogenous area if they conform to the above characteristics and the regulated minimum sample quantities of each type of material are collected and analyzed. 6.1 Material Friability A material can either be friable or non friable. A friable material is one that, when dry, can be pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, a non-friable material cannot. A non-friable material may become friable if its condition had deteriorated or has been impacted by forces that have rendered it friable. 4 6.2 Material Classifications Sampled materials are divided into one of the following three categories: • Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building members • Thermal System Insulation (TSI): any type of pipe, boiler, tank, or duct insulation • Miscellaneous Material: all other materials not classified in the above two categories 6.3 Material Conditions Sampled materials are placed into one of the three following categories of conditions: • Good: none to very little visible damage or deterioration • Damaged: the surface is crumbling, blistered, water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed, or one-quarter if the damage is localized • Significantly Damaged: the surface is crumbling, blistered, water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over greater than one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed, or one-quarter if the damage is localized 6.4 Sample Quantities DSC collected at least the minimum number of samples from each homogeneous area necessary to meet all regulatory requirements for the quantity of material to be disturbed. The quantities listed in this report are approximate and on-site verification of the exact quantity of each material is required. The following outlines the minimum sample quantities required per homogeneous area: • Surfacing Materials: up to 1,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of three (3) samples; between 1,000 ft2 and 5,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of five (5) samples; over 5,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of seven (7) samples; one (1) sample of each patch • Thermal System Insulation (TSI): each homogeneous area requires a minimum of three (3) samples; at least one (1) sample must be collected from each patch; and collect enough samples sufficient to adequately assess the material and determine the asbestos content for TSI fittings such as pipe elbows or T's. • Miscellaneous Materials: collect enough samples sufficient to determine the asbestos content 7.0 Overview of Findings All suspect asbestos-containing materials in and on the residence were sampled and analyzed for asbestos. These materials included the exterior stucco and window caulking as well as interior drywall, sheet vinyl flooring, vinyl cove base, carpet, CMU block, and pipe wrap. Of the sampled materials, the following contain asbestos greater than 1% Chrysotile, or assumed to contain greater than 1% Chrysotile: The white, smooth textured drywall found in the exterior wood closet outside the main front door The white, slightly textured drywall found throughout the entire residence The faux brick sheet vinyl flooring found in the shared hallway bathroom and the bedroom bathroom The wallpapered drywall in the entry bedroom and the shared hallway bathroom The window caulk of the main front, south window under the "1027" moniker 5 DSC collected a total of twenty-eight (28) asbestos bulk-samples of fourteen (14) homogeneous areas. Table 1 below describes the materials composing each homogeneous area as well as the locations of each bulk-sample collected. Also listed is the classification, condition, friability and estimated quantity of material to be removed and/or disturbed, as well as the asbestos content within each bulk-sample. Please see Appendix B:Analytical Data for the layer break-down of each bulk-sample. 6 TABLE 1 HA Sample Material Sample Material Material Estimated Material Asbestos # ID Description Location Classification Condition Quantity Friability Content STC1-1 Exterior, Beige Stucco Exterior W Wall SM G 4,500 ft2 Friable STC1-2 Exterior, Beige Stucco Exterior W Wall SM G 4,500 ft2 Friable 1 STC1-3 Exterior, Beige Stucco Exterior E Wall SM G 4,500 ft2 Friable ND STC1-4 Exterior, Beige Stucco Exterior N Wall SM G 4,500 ft2 Friable STC1-5 Exterior, Beige Stucco Exterior S Wall SM G 4,500 ft2 Friable DW1-1 White,Smooth Drywall Exterior Wood Closet SM G -100 ft2 Friable Texture (Front Door) 2 DW1-2 White,Smooth Drywall Exterior Wood Closet SM G -100 ft2 Friable 2%CHRY Texture (Front Door) DW1-3 White,Smooth Drywall Exterior Wood Closet SM G -100 ft2 Friable Texture (Front Door) DW2-1 White,Slightly Textured Dining Room NE Corner SM G >5,000 ft2 Friable Drywall Wall DW2-2 White,Slightly Textured Entry NW Corner Wall SM G >5,000 ft2 Friable Drywall DW2-3 White,Slightly Textured Main to Lower Stairwell SM G >5,000 ft2 Friable Drywall Ceiling 3 DW2-4 White,Slightly Textured Upper Level Study SW SM G >5,000 ft2 Friable 2% CHRY Drywall Corner Wall DW2-5 White,Slightly Textured Upper Level Family Room SM G >5,000 ft2 Friable Drywall NE Corner Wall DW2-6 White,Slightly Textured Kitchen Ceiling SM G >5,000 W Friable Drywall DW2 7 White,Slightly Textured Stairwell to Lowest Level SM G >5,000 ft2 Friable Drywall Ceiling SV1-1 Faux Brick Sheet Vinyl Hallway Shared Bathroom MM G —200 ft? Friable Floor 4 25% CHRY SV1-2 Faux Brick Sheet Vinyl Bedroom Bathroom Floor MM G —200 ftz Friable WP1-1 Wallpapered Drywall Entry Bedroom SW Wall MM G —500 ftz Friable 0 Hallway Shared Bathroom 2%CHRY WP1-2 Wallpapered Drywall Wall MM G 500 ft z Friable 6 CLK1-1 Window Caulk Exterior Rear E Bumpout Wall MM G —10 ft Friable ND Window Next to Exit Door 7 CLK2-1 Window Caulk Exterior E Wall Window MM G —10 ft Friable ND Front Window Under TRACE 8 CLK3-1 Window Caulk „1027„ MM G —10 ft Friable Assumed>1% 9 C131-1 Yellow Cove Base Hallway Shared Bathroom MM G —20 ft Non- ND Wall Friable 10 C132-1 Black Cove Base Kitchen Wall MM G —20 ft Non- ND Friable 11 CPMA1-1 Solid Green Carpet/Mastic Lowest Level Mechanical MM G —200 ftz Non- ND Room Floor Friable 12 CPMA2-1 Mixed Green Lowest Level Storage/Water MM G —400 ftz Non- ND Carpet/Mastic Heater Room Floor Friable 13 CMU1-1 Block Filler Lowest Level Mechanical MM G —300 ftz Non- ND Room Wall Friable 14 PW1-1 White Pipe Wrap Lowest Level Storage/Water TSI G < 2 ft Friable ND Heater Room Pipes HA- Homogeneous Area G- Good CHRY- Chrysotile SM - Surfacing Material ND - None-detect D - Damaged ACT-Actinolite MM - Miscellaneous Material TR-Trace, <1%Visual Estimate SD - Significantly Damaged TSI-Thermal System Insulation 8 8.0 Conclusion & Recommendations Asbestos was identified within the materials of the residence that were within the scope of the full- building inspection and bulk-sampling performed on June 18, 2013; therefore, professional abatement activities are required to remove the above-referenced asbestos-containing materials prior to the demolition of the building. 9.0 Asbestos Abatement & Demolition Requirements If ACM is to be removed or disturbed in a single-family residence, and the total quantity exceeds any of the regulatory trigger levels of 50 linear ft. on pipes, 32 ftz on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55-gallon drum, a CDPHE-certified General Abatement Contractor (GAC) is required to perform the work. The regulatory trigger levels within a commercial building are 260 linear ft. on pipes, 160 ftz on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55-gallon drum. In addition, formal notification to CDPHE prior to the abatement of ACM as well as air monitoring, visual inspections, and final air clearances by a CDPHE-certified Asbestos AMS is required. DSC can provide the client or building owner with a proposal for project design, abatement oversight and air monitoring upon request. CDPHE regulations allow for the demolition of a building that contains non-friable asbestos-containing materials, such as caulking, mastic or resilient floor tiles. However, demolition must be completed without causing the non-friable ACM to be rendered friable. Burning a building with any ACM is prohibited. Operations such as sanding, cutting, crushing, grinding, pneumatic jacking, etc. of ACM are not permitted. Recycling of building materials such as concrete, metal, or wood that are bonded or contaminated with ACM, e.g. glue, caulking, or mastic is also prohibited. If any of the non-friable asbestos containing materials are to be recycled and rendered friable after demolition (i.e. crushing mastic-coated concrete), these materials must be abated of all ACM prior to shipping offsite for recycling. OSHA regulations regarding occupational exposure during demolition activities is still mandatory. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires that workers performing construction-related activities be protected from asbestos fibers in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 0.1 f/cc of air. Contractors are must comply with applicable provisions of OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 during demolition and renovation activities. These OSHA provisions include, but are not limited to, PPE and respirators, personnel training, personal- exposure air monitoring, employee medical surveillance, wet removal methods, signage for regulated areas, etc. 10.0 Major & Minor Asbestos Spill Response Actions If ACM is significantly damaged and the total quantity exceeds the regulatory trigger levels, the area is deemed a "Major Asbestos Spill." The area is consequently subject to the requirements in Reg. 8, Section III.T.1. - Major Asbestos Spills, as outlined below. Additional asbestos air or dust sampling should also be conducted within the remaining areas not directly impacted by the Major Asbestos Spill to determine if asbestos-containing dust/debris has spread to adjacent areas. If asbestos fibers are found within any other areas or on building contents, they should be included in the scope of professional abatement and decontamination. The following response actions must be followed per Colorado Reg. 8 when a Major Asbestos Spill occurs: • Restrict access to the area and post warning signs to prevent entry to the area by persons other than those necessary to respond to the incident. • Shut off or temporarily modify the air handling system to prevent the distribution of asbestos fibers to other areas. • Immediately contact the Division by telephone, submit a notification in compliance with subsection III.E. (Notifications) and, if in an area of public access, apply for a permit in accordance with subsection III.G. (Permits). • Be exempted from the requirements to have a certified Supervisor on-site at all times, until such time as the immediate danger has passed. Any cleanup or asbestos abatement that must occur after the immediate danger has passed shall be supervised by a person certified by the Division. • Using certified Supervisors and certified Workers in accordance with section II. (Certification Requirements) of this Regulation, seal all openings between the contaminated and uncontaminated areas and establish none-detect air pressure within the contaminated area in accordance with paragraph III.J. (Air Cleaning and None-detect Pressure Requirements). This is to be accomplished using polyethylene sheeting to cover areas such as doorways, windows, elevator openings, corridor entrances, grills, drains, grates, diffusers and skylights. • HEPA vacuum or steam clean all carpets, drapes, upholstery, and other non-clothing fabrics in the contaminated area, or discard these materials. • Launder or discard contaminated clothing in accordance with subsection III.R. (Waste Handling). • HEPA vacuum or wet clean all surfaces in the contaminated area. • Discard all materials in accordance with subsection III.R. (Waste Handling). • Following completion of subparagraph III.T.1.a. through III.T.1.i. above, comply with air monitoring requirements as described in subsection III.P. (Clearing Abatement Projects); air samples shall be collected aggressively as described in 40 C.F.R. Part 763, Appendix A to Subpart E (EPA 1995), except that the air stream of the leaf blower shall not be directed at any friable ACM that remains in the area and • Comply with any other measures deemed necessary by the Division to protect public health. In the event of an asbestos spill involving less than or equal to the trigger levels, the building owner or contractor should take the following non-mandatory steps: • Restrict entry to the area and post warning signs to prevent entry to the area by persons other than those necessary to respond to the incident. • Shut off or temporarily modify the air handling system to prevent the distribution of fibers to other areas in the building. • Seal all openings between the contaminated and uncontaminated areas. This is to be accomplished by using polyethylene sheeting to cover all areas such as windows, doorways, elevator openings, corridor entrances, drains, grills, grates, diffusers and skylights. • HEPA vacuum or steam clean all carpets, draperies, upholstery and other non-clothing fabrics in the contaminated area, or discard all contaminated materials in accordance with subsection III.R. (Waste Handling). • Launder or discard contaminated clothing in accordance with subsection III.R. (Waste Handling). • HEPA vacuum or wet clean all non-fabric surfaces in the contaminated area. • Following completion of subparagraphs III.T.2.a. through III.T.21 of Regulation 8, conduct air monitoring as described in paragraph III.P.3 of Regulation 8. (Final Clearance Air Monitoring and Sample Analyses); air samples shall be collected aggressively as described in 40 C.F.R. Part 763, Appendix A to Subpart E (EPA 1995), except that the air stream of the leaf blower shall not be directed at any friable ACM that remains in the work area. 10 11.0 Disclaimer & Limitations The activities outlined in this report were conducted in a manner consistent with a level of care and expertise exercised by members of the environmental consulting and industrial hygiene profession. All activities were performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations as well as generally accepted standards and professional practice. No warranty is either expressed or implied. DSC assumes no responsibility or liability for error in public information utilized, statements from sources other than DSC, or developments resulting from situations outside the scope of this project. The details provided within this report outline the inspection activities on the date(s) indicated and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date, the limited number of bulk-samples collected, and the laboratory results of those bulk-samples. The laboratory results contained in this report apply specifically to the materials in which bulk-samples were collected. The results do not include or apply to any other materials within the structure that were not sampled, but may contain asbestos; including materials that may be hidden or inaccessible. Additional inspection and bulk- sampling activities would be required to determine if any other materials contain asbestos. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by the Client, with specific application to their project as discussed in the scope of work. The results of any surfacing material indicated in this report also includes any associated overspray of that material, e.g., under carpet, above suspended ceilings, etc. The information contained in this report is intended as supplementary material for abatement design and is not to be used as the scope of work for abatement activities, bidding or billing purposes. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. DSC can provide a full scope of work for abatement upon request. DSC does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. 11 APPENDIX A ANALYTICAL DATA 12 adLisi&L 780 Simms Street Suite 104 E R b i<: C>q t F;ZAT+ R' " Golden, CO, 80401 ASSOCIATES, 1NC RP" RATED 303.232.3746 Certificate of Analysis www.aerobiology.net Client Name DS Consulting Date Collected: 06/18/13 Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. Date Received: 06/19/13 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/26/13 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 06/26/13 Client Project Name: 1207 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, CO Project ID: 13007976 Job ID: Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA-600/R-93/116, July 1993. Homo- Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample/Layer geneous Layer Asbestos Detected Asbestos Percentage Fiber Material Material Client Lab Sample Number (Y/N) Percentage Percentage Percentage Com osition 13007976-IA White Paint N 1% ND 100 13007976-1B White Texture N 3% CHRY 2 98 C DWI-1 13007976-IC White Tape N 3% ND 98 2 13007976-1D White Joint Compound N 5% CHRY 2 98 C 13007976-IE White/Tan Drywall N 88% ND 15 85 G DWI-2 13007976-2 PROGRESSIVE DWI-3 13007976-3 PROGRESSIVE 13007976 4A White Paint N 2% ND 100 DW2-1 13007976-4B White Tape N 4% ND 98 2 13007976 4C White/Tan Drywall N 20% ND 15 85 G A = Amosite Q = Quartz P = Perlite AC = Actinolite C = Carbonates B = Binder AN = Anthophyllite G = Gypsum D=Diatoms CHRY=Ch ry sotile M = Mica CR = Crocidolite T = Tar TR = Tremolite NTR = Non-Asbestiform TR Paul Knappe Ron Weyand Trace=Less Than 1% NAC = Non-Asbestiform AC Laboratory Analyst Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor ND=None Detected Page 1 of 6 780 Simms Street, Suite 104, Golden, CO, 80401 adLisi&L 780 Simms Street Suite 104 A1E R b i A qY t F;ZAT+ R' " Golden, CO, 80401 ASSOCIATES, 1NC RP" RATED 303.232.3746 Certificate of Analysis www.aerobiology.net Client Name DS Consulting Date Collected: 06/18/13 Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. Date Received: 06/19/13 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/26/13 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 06/26/13 Client Project Name: 1207 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, CO Project ID: 13007976 Job ID: Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA-600/R-93/116, July 1993. Homo- Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample/Layer geneous Layer Asbestos Detected Asbestos Percentage Fiber Material Material Client Lab Sample Number (Y/N) Percentage Percentage Percentage Com osition 13007976 4D White Texture N 34% CHRY 2 98 C DW2-1 13007976-4E White Joint Compound N 40% CHRY 2 98 C DW2-2 13007976-5 PROGRESSIVE DW2-3 13007976-6 PROGRESSIVE DW24 13007976-7 PROGRESSIVE DW2-5 13007976-8 PROGRESSIVE DW2-6 13007976-9 PROGRESSIVE DW2-7 13007976-10 PROGRESSIVE STC 1-1 13007976-11 White/Gray Granular Plaster w/White Paint N 100% ND 100 Q STC 1-2 13007976-12 White/Gray Granular Plaster w/White Paint N 100% ND 100 Q A = Amosite Q = Quartz P = Perlite AC = Actinolite C = Carbonates B = Binder ' AN = Anthophyllite G = Gypsum D=Diatoms CHRY=Chrysotile M = Mica CR = Crocidolite T = Tar TR = Tremolite NTR = Non-Asbestiform TR Paul Knappe Ron Weyand Trace=Less Than 1% NAC = Non-Asbestiform AC Laboratory Analyst Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor ND=None Detected Page 2 of 6 780 Simms Street, Suite 104, Golden, CO, 80401 adLisi&L 780 Simms Street Suite 104 E R b i<: C>q t F;ZAT+ R' " Golden, CO, 80401 ASSOCIATES, 1NC RP" RATED 303.232.3746 Certificate of Analysis www.aerobiology.net Client Name DS Consulting Date Collected: 06/18/13 Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. Date Received: 06/19/13 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/26/13 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 06/26/13 Client Project Name: 1207 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, CO Project ID: 13007976 Job ID: Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA-600/R-93/116, July 1993. Homo- Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample/Layer geneous Layer Asbestos Detected Asbestos Percentage Fiber Material Material Client Lab Sample Number (Y/N) Percentage Percentage Percentage Com osition STC 1-3 13007976-13 White/Gray Granular Plaster w/White Paint N 100% ND 100 Q STC 1-4 13007976-14 White/Gray Granular Plaster w/White Paint N 100% ND 100 Q STC 1-5 13007976-15 White Granular Plaster w/White Paint N 100% ND 100 Q CLK1-1 13007976-16 Yellow Caulk w/Black Paint N 100% ND 100 B CLK1-2 13007976-17 Gray Caulk w/Black Paint N 100% ND 100 C 13007976-18A Brown Wood N 10% ND 100 CLK1-3 13007976-18B Tan & White Caulk w/Brown Paint N 90% CHRY Trace 100 SV 1-1 13007976-19 White Sheet Vinyl w/White Fibrous N 100% CHRY 25 5 70 B Backing & White Mastic SV1-2 13007976-20 PROGRESSIVE CB 1-1 13007976-21A Tan Mastic N 15% ND 100 B A = Amosite Q = Quartz P = Perlite AC = Actinolite C = Carbonates B = Binder ' AN = Anthophyllite G = Gypsum D=Diatoms CHRY=Chrysotile M = Mica c �- CR = Crocidolite T = Tar TR = Tremolite NTR = Non-Asbestiform TR Paul Knappe Ron Weyand Trace=Less Than 1% NAC = Non-Asbestiform AC Laboratory Analyst Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor ND=None Detected Page 3 of 6 780 Simms Street, Suite 104, Golden, CO, 80401 adLisi&L 780 Simms Street Suite 104 E R b i<: C>q t F;ZAT+ R' " Golden, CO, 80401 ASSOCIATES, 1NC RP" RATED 303.232.3746 Certificate of Analysis www.aerobiology.net Client Name DS Consulting Date Collected: 06/18/13 Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. Date Received: 06/19/13 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/26/13 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 06/26/13 Client Project Name: 1207 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, CO Project ID: 13007976 Job ID: Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA-600/R-93/116, July 1993. Homo- Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample/Layer geneous Layer Asbestos Detected Asbestos Percentage Fiber Material Material Client Lab Sample Number (Y/N) Percentage Percentage Percentage Com osition CB 1-1 13007976-21B White Cove Base N 85% ND 100 13007976-22A Yellow Mastic N 5% ND 100 B CB2-1 13007976-22B Black Cove Base N 95% ND 100 13007976-23A Yellow Mastic N 10% ND 100 B CPMA1-1 13007976-23B Green Carpet N 90% ND 98 2 13007976-24A Gray Foam N 5% ND 100 CPMA2-1 13007976-24B White Mastic N 5% ND 100 B 13007976-24C Green/Yellow Carpet N 90% ND 98 2 13007976-25A White Compound N 2% CHRY 2 98 C WP1-1 13007976-25B Yellow Wall Covering w/Yellow Mastic N 10% ND 30 70 B A = Amosite Q = Quartz P = Perlite AC = Actinolite C = Carbonates B = Binder ' AN = Anthophyllite G = Gypsum D=Diatoms CHRY=Chrysotile M = Mica c - CR = Crocidolite T = Tar TR = Tremolite NTR = Non-Asbestiform TR Paul Knappe Ron Weyand Trace=Less Than 1% NAC = Non-Asbestiform AC Laboratory Analyst Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor ND=None Detected Page 4 of 6 780 Simms Street, Suite 104, Golden, CO, 80401 adLisi&L 780 Simms Street Suite 104 E R b i<: C>q t F;ZAT+ R' " Golden, CO, 80401 ASSOCIATES, 1NC RP" RATED 303.232.3746 Certificate of Analysis www.aerobiology.net Client Name DS Consulting Date Collected: 06/18/13 Street address 5366 Flatrock Ct. Date Received: 06/19/13 City, State ZIP Morrison, CO 80465 Date Analyzed: 06/26/13 Attn: Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 06/26/13 Client Project Name: 1207 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, CO Project ID: 13007976 Job ID: Test Requested: 3002, Asbestos in Bulk Samples Method: Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM), Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. EPA-600/R-93/116, July 1993. Homo- Non-Asbestos Non-Fibrous Matrix Sample Identification Physical Description of Sample/Layer geneous Layer Asbestos Detected Asbestos Percentage Fiber Material Material Client Lab Sample Number (Y/N) Percentage Percentage Percentage Com osition WP 1-1 13007976-25C White/Tan Drywall N 88% ND 15 85 G WP1-2 13007976-26 PROGRESSIVE 13007976-27A White Block Filler N 3% ND 100 CMV1-1 13007976-27B Gray Granular Plaster N 97% ND 100 Q 13007976-28A Yellow Mastic N 10% ND 100 B PW1-1 13007976-28B Silver Wrap N 90% ND 50 50 B A = Amosite Q = Quartz P = Perlite AC = Actinolite C = Carbonates B = Binder ' AN = Anthophyllite G = Gypsum D=Diatoms CHRY=Chrysotile M = Mica CR = Crocidolite T = Tar TR = Tremolite NTR = Non-Asbestiform TR Paul Knappe Ron Weyand Trace=Less Than 1% NAC = Non-Asbestiform AC Laboratory Analyst Asbestos Laboratory Supervisor ND=None Detected Page 5 of 6 780 Simms Street, Suite 104, Golden, CO, 80401 780 Simms Street AA" Suite 104 ,r E rZ"b i u 4"qY Golden, CO, 80401 ASSOCIATES, INC€ RPO TED 303.232.3746 Certificate of Analysis www.aerobiology.net DS Consulting o Date Collected: 06/18/13 5366 Flatrock Ct. MW Date Received: 06/19/13 Morrison, CO 80465 Af Date Analyzed: 06/26/13 Steve Shurtliff NVLAP Lab Code 200860-0 Date Reported: 06/26/13 Client Project Name: 1207 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, CO Project ID: 13007976 Job ID: General Notes ♦ ND indicates no asbestos was detected; the method detection limit is I %. ♦ Trace or "<1" indicates asbestos was identified in the sample, but the concentration is less than 1%. ♦ All regulated asbestos minerals (i.e. chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite) were sought in every layer of each sample, but only those asbestos minerals detected are listed. Amosite is the common name for the asbestiform variety of the minerals cummingtonite and grunerite. Crocidolite is the common name used for the asbestiform variety of the mineral riebeckite. ♦ Tile, vinyl, foam, plastic, and fine powder samples may contain asbestos fibers of such small diameter (< 0.25 microns in diameter) that these fibers cannot be detected by PLM. For such samples, more sensitive analytical methods (e.g. TEM, SEM, and XRD) are recommended if greater certainty about asbestos content is required. Semi-quantitative bulk TEM floor the analysis is accepted under NESHAP regulations. ♦ These results are submitted pursuant to Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc.'s current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. No responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. ♦ Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, Aerobiology Laboratory Associates, Inc. will store the samples for a minimum period of thirty (30) days before discarding. A shipping and handling charge will be assessed for the return of any samples. ♦ Aerobiology does not guarantee the results of tape lifts, microvacs, wipe, and/or debris samples. Accurate analysis cannot be performed due to particle size, media used, and/or amount of material given. Analysis of these materials should be preformed by a TEM. A result of ND does not indicate that the sample area does not contain asbestos. It means the analyst could not identify asbestos in the specific sample for the reasons listed above. Notes Required by NVLAP ♦ This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. ♦ This test report relates only to the items tested or calibrated. ♦ This report is not valid unless it bears the name of a NVLAP-approved signatory. ♦ Any reproduction of this document must include the entire document in order for the report to be valid. Page 6 of 6 780 Simms Street, Suite 104, Golden, CO, 80401 oCnsulti ng Final Clearance Air Monitoring Report 1027 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, Colorado 81657 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Presented To: Ms. Linda Froemke EXCEL Environmental, Inc. 1852 Jasper St. Unit E Aurora CO 80017 Performed &Prepared By: Ms. Blake Bradley DS Consulting, Inc. 12477 W Cedar Dr, Ste 101 Lakewood, CO 80228 (970) 281-2566 Project Details: Project Number: 8261 Conducted: August 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Site Description 3.0 Scope of Work 4.0 Certifications 5.0 Final Visual &Final Clearance Procedures 6.0 Air Sample Analyzation 7.0 Air Sample Results 8.0 Copyright Notice APPENDIX A AMS/Analyst Certificates 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction On August 30, 2013, DS Consulting, Inc. (DSC) conducted a final visual inspection, performed aggressive clearance air monitoring, and analyzed clearance air quality samples via Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) for an asbestos abatement project within the residence located at 1027 Ptarmigan Rd, Vail, Colorado. Excel Environmental was the General Abatement Contractor (GAC) performing the asbestos abatement within the residence. Mr. Jose Madera was the GAC supervisor on-site during the final clearance. 2.0 Site Description The residence is a wood-framed, multi-level, single-family residence. 3.0 Scope of Work The asbestos abatement activities were conducted to remove approximately 1,800 ft2 of asbestos- containing surfacing texture and 20 ft2 of asbestos-containing sheet vinyl flooring from a single full containment encompassing the entire house. This asbestos abatement project was a fully permitted project with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) for the purpose of demolition. 4.0 Certifications The final visual inspection, the aggressive clearance air monitoring, and the PCM air sample analyzation were conducted by Ms. Blake Bradley with DSC. Ms. Bradley is a CDPHE certified Air Monitoring Specialist (AMS); having certification number 16862 and a NIOSH 582 certified analyst. DSC is a CDPHE certified Asbestos Consulting Firm, Registration No. 14912 and a participant in the Industrial Hygiene Proficiency Analytical Testing (IHPAT) program with laboratory ID No. 188987 maintaining a rating of Proficient. 5.0 Final Visual & Final Clearance Procedures Prior to the collection of final clearance air samples, a final visual inspection was conducted to ensure all of the visual requirements of CDPHE's Regulation 8, Part B - Asbestos, were met. Once the abatement area passed the final visual inspection, DSC collected final clearance air samples from multiple locations within the containment. Following the collection of the final clearance air samples, the samples were analyzed - along with sample blanks - to determine the airborne fiber concentrations. The air samples were collected at an average flow rate 15 liters per minute (L/m) using Thomas high- volume pumps with a minimum of 500 liters being collected. Flow rates were collected at the beginning and at the end of the sampling period utilizing an airflow rotameter calibrated against a primary-flow calibration instrument. Start times and stop times were recorded for all sampling periods. 3 6.0 Air Sample Analyzation The final clearance PCM samples were collected on 25-millimeter (mm) mixed-cellulose, ester-membrane filters with a 0.8-micron pore size and an effective collection area of 385 mm. All filters were pre- assembled by the manufacturer in three-stage, conductive sampling cassettes with extension cowls. A field blank and lab blank were also collected and analyzed along with the clearance samples. 7.0 Air Sampling Results The abatement project passed the final visual inspection and the analytical results of all final clearance samples collected were below CDPHE's clearance criteria of 0.01 fibers/cubic centimeter (f/cc). This amount, quantified as "fibers", is not specific to asbestos fibers; therefore, all fibers that meet the counting criteria are counted as asbestos fibers. If the total fiber count is less than 0.01 fibers/cubic centimeter (f/cc), it is known that the total asbestos fiber count is also less than 0.01 fibers/cubic centimeter (f/cc). Please see Table 1 for analytical data. 8.0 Copyright Notice © DS Consulting, Inc. 2013. All Rights Reserved. This document contains material protected under Federal Copyright Laws. No part of this document or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted,without the prior written consent of the author and DS Consulting, Inc. 4 TABLE 1 Sample Sample Collection Rate Collection Time Air Volume Fields Reporting Limit Fiber Fiber ID Location (Liter/Minute) (Minutes) (Liters) Analyzed (Fibers/cc) Count Concentration (Fibers/cc) CL1 Top Level Loft 15 36 540 100 0.005 1.0 BRL CL2 2nd Level Down, Living Room 15 35 525 100 0.005 0.5 BRL With Fire Place CL3 Main Level Bedroom By Front 15 35 525 100 0.005 1.0 BRL Door CL4 Bedroom With Two Large 15 34 510 100 0.005 1.5 BRL Closets CL5 Lower Landing By Bedroom 15 34 510 100 0.005 1.0 BRL and Basement LB Lab Blank N/A N/A N/A 100 0.000 0.0 0.000 FB Field Blank N/A N/A N/A 100 0.000 0.0 0.000 *Sample analysis has been blank corrected BRL= Below Reporting Limit CBR= Cannot Be Read APPENDIX A - AMS/ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS } pT. 1 Colorado Ikpartment Of Public Healdt and,Fnrironmem r ' ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION* � _ This certifies that - I Blake Bradley d � Certification No.:16862 _ i' has mct the requirements of25-7-507,C.R.S.and Air Quality Control s}` Commission Regulation No.8,Part IS,and is hereby certified by the state of Colorado in the following discipline: Air Monitoring Specialist* 1 �^ Issued: Judy 13,2013 ` Expires: July 13,2014 1 •lhly rr%1t.aah,dNONi.itll d.v.++®eon 1. �a� '` cxmmlAivrimrpvomJ,minq+8mumz ceNhmf+n ..' .a '.` In lbe rq'sdyl R 1 M.', WneG�+.M.Lief Y ri _ SELL 1 Environmental raining; & onsulting 2761 West Oxfurd Avenue k7 Englewood,Colorado go 10 303 78141422 CERTIFIES THAT BLAKE L.BRADLEY has successfully completed THE NIOSH 582 EQUIVALENT COURSE SAMPLING&EVALUATING AIRBORNE ASBESTOS DUST I Course Date: 05124-05?28110 No.of hours: 40 Exam Date: 05/28/10 Certificate No.: D0052810__-04 Authorized(Signature REScheck Software Version 4.4.4 Compliance Certificate iA I. ;Y�� Project Title: Resnick Residence ''�`°1 m� 10/9/13 Energy Code: 2012 IECC 39 Location: Vail, Colorado Construction Type: Single Family • u, Project Type: New construction 0 �. ,• Building Orientation: Bldg.orientation unspecified6` "• .•.•••'•�� Glazing Area Percentage: 30% '%N AL Heating Degree Days: 9248 Climate Zone: 6 Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 1027 Ptarmigan Road Mike Foster Hans Berglund Vail,CO 81657 Triumph Development Berglund Architects 12 Vail Road 210 Edwards Village Blvd Suite 700 Suite Al 03 Vail,CO 81657 Edwards,CO 81632 970-479-9990 970-926-4301 mikef @triumphdev.com hans @berglundarchitects.com Compliance: Compliance:16.2%Better Than Code Maximum UA:1738 Your UA:1457 The%Better or Worse Than Code index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum-code home. Gross Cavity Cont. Glazing UA Assembly Area or R-Value R-Value or Door Perimeter U-Factor Roof:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss 3862 41.0 25.0 65 Skylight:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 10 0.350 4 SHGC:0.00 AG Walls:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 9355 20.0 10.0 226 Orientation:Unspecified Windows:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 1792 0.300 538 SHGC:0.00 Orientation:Unspecified Glass Doors:Glass 974 0.300 292 SHGC:0.00 Orientation:Unspecified Solid Doors:Solid 304 0.300 91 Orientation:Unspecified BG Walls:Solid Concrete or Masonry 3814 13.0 25.0 84 Orientation:Unspecified Wall height:12.0' Depth below grade:10.3' Insulation depth: 12.0' Slab:Slab-On-Grade:Heated 240 15.0 157 Insulation depth:6.0' Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications,and other calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2012 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.4.4 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Jeff Herschel - EIT 10/9/13 Name Title Sig u Date Project Notes: Project Title: Resnick Residence Report date: 10/09/13 Data filename:J:\Jobs\2013-Jobs\13061.00-Resnick Residence\Mechanical\Calculations\Rescheck\13061-Rescheck.rck Page 1 of 6 Calcs by: Jeff Herschel-Rader Engineering 970-845-7910 x113 Project Title: Resnick Residence Report date: 10/09/13 Data filename:J:\Jobs\2013-Jobs\13061.00-Resnick Residence\Mechanical\Calculations\Rescheck\13061-Rescheck.rck Page 2 of 6 f: I REScheck Software Version 4.4.4 Inspection Checklist Energy Code: 2012 IECC Location: Vail, Colorado Construction Type: Single Family Project Type: New construction Building Orientation: Bldg.orientation unspecified Glazing Area Percentage: 30% Heating Degree Days: 9248 Climate Zone: 6 Ceilings: ❑ Roof:Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss, R-41.0 cavity+R-25.0 continuous insulation Comments: Where air permeable insulation exists in vented attics,a baffle(of solid material)is installed adjacent to soffit and eave vents. Baffles maintain an opening equal or greater than the size of the vent.The baffle extends over the top of the attic insulation. Above-Grade Walls: ❑ AG Walls:Wood Frame, 16"o.c., R-20.0 cavity+R-10.0 continuous insulation Continuous insulation specified for this above-grade wall has consistent R-value rating across full area of the wall. Comments: Basement Walls: ❑ BG Walls:Solid Concrete or Masonry, 12.0'ht/10.3'bg/12.0'insul, R-13.0 cavity+R-25.0 continuous insulation Comments: Windows: ❑ Windows:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U-factor:0.300 For windows without labeled U-factors,describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Skylights: ❑ Skylight:Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U-factor:0.350 For skylights without labeled U-factors,describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Doors: ❑ Glass Doors:Glass, U-factor:0.300 Comments: ❑ Solid Doors:Solid, U-factor:0.300 Comments: Floors: ❑ Slab:Slab-On-Grade:Heated,6.0'insulation depth, R-15.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 6.0 ft.OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 6.0 ft. Air Leakage: ❑ Building envelope air tightness complies by a post rough-in blower door test result of less than 3 ACH at 50 pascals. ❑ Automatic or gravity dampers are installed on all outdoor air intakes and exhausts. ❑ Wood-burning fireplaces shall have tight-fitting flue dampers and outdoor combustion air. Project Title: Resnick Residence Report date: 10/09/13 Data filename:J:\Jobs\2013-Jobs\13061.00-Resnick Residence\Mechanical\Calculations\Rescheck\13061-Rescheck.rck Page 3 of 6 Air Barrier, Sealing,and Insulation Installation Criteria: Li A continuous air barrier is installed in the building envelope including rim joists and exposed edges of insulation.Breaks or joints in the air barrier are sealed.Air permeable insulation is not used as a sealing material. Junction of foundation and wall sill plates,wall top plate and top of wall,sill plate and rim-band,and rim band and subfloor are sealed. Corners, headers,and rim joists making up the thermal envelope are insulated. Insulation in floors(including above garage and cantilevered floors)is installed to maintain permanent contact with underside of subfloor decking. Exterior insulation for framed walls is in substantial contact and continuous alignment with the air barrier.Crawl space wall insulation installed in lieu of floor insulation is permanently attached to crawlspace walls. Inspection of log walls is in accordance with the provisions of ICC-400. ❑ Spaces between fenestration jambs and framing and skylights and framing are sealed. Batts in narrow cavities are cut to fit;or narrow cavities are filled with insulation that readily fills the available cavity space. ❑ Exposed earth in unvented crawl spaces is covered with Class I vapor retarder with overlapping joints taped. Air sealing is installed between the garage and conditioned spaces. Exterior walls adjacent to showers and tubs are insulated and have air barrier separating the wall from the shower and tubs. ❑ Access openings,drop down stairs or knee wall doors to unconditioned attic spaces are insulated and sealed. F1 Recessed light fixtures installed in the building thermal envelope are IC rated,airtight labeled at air leakage rate<=2.0 cfm,and sealed to the drywall with gasket or caulk. Fi Duct shafts,utility penetrations,and flue shafts opening to exterior or unconditioned space are air sealed. ❑ Plumbing and Wiring: Insulation is placed between the exterior of the wall assembly and pipes.Batt insulation is cut and fitted around wiring and plumbing,or for insulation that on installation readily conforms to available space such insulation shall fill all space between wall and piping/wiring. F-i Air barrier extends behind electrical or communication boxes or,air sealed type boxes are installed. ❑ HVAC register boots that penetrate building thermal envelope are sealed to subfloor or drywall. ❑ Fireplace walls have air barrier and closure doors are gasketed. Sunrooms: ❑ Sunrooms that are NOT thermally isolated from the building envelope meet the requirements applicable to the building envelope. Materials Identification and Installation: FA Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. ❑ Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined. ❑ Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided. ❑ Insulation R-values and glazing U-factors are clearly marked on the building plans or specifications. Duct Insulation: Supply ducts in attics are insulated to a minimum of R-8.All other ducts in unconditioned spaces or outside the building envelope are insulated to at least R-6. Duct Construction and Testing: Building framing cavities are not used as ducts or plenums. ❑ All joints and seams of air ducts,air handlers,and filter boxes are substantially airtight by means of tapes,mastics, liquid sealants, gasketing or other approved closure systems.Tapes, mastics,and fasteners are rated UL 181A or UL 181B and are labeled according to the duct construction.Metal duct connections with equipment and/or fittings are mechanically fastened.Crimp joints for round metal ducts have a contact lap of at least 1 1/2 inches and are fastened with a minimum of three equally spaced sheet-metal screws. Exceptions: Joint and seams covered with air-impermeable spray foam. Where a partially inaccessible duct connection exists,mechanical fasteners can be equally spaced on the exposed portion of the joint so as to prevent a hinge effect. Continuously welded and locking-type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at less than 2 in.w.g. (500 Pa). ❑ All ducts and air handlers are located within conditioned space. Temperature Controls: ❑ Where the primary heating system is a forced air-furnace,at least one programmable thermostat is installed to control the primary heating system and has set-points initialized at 70 degree F for the heating cycle and 78 degree F for the cooling cycle. Heat pumps having supplementary electric-resistance heat have controls that prevent supplemental heat operation when the compressor can meet the heating load. Heating and Cooling Equipment Sizing: ❑ Equipment is sized in accordance with ACCA Manual S based on building loads calculated in accordance with ACCA Manual J or other approved heating and cooling calculation methodologies. Project Title: Resnick Residence Report date: 10/09/13 Data filename:J:\Jobs\2013-Jobs\13061.00-Resnick Residence\Mechanical\Calculations\Rescheck\13061-Rescheck.rck Page 4 of 6 For systems serving multiple dwelling units documentation has been submitted demonstrating compliance with 2012 IECC Commercial Building Mechanical and/or Service Water Heating(Sections C403 and C404). Circulating Service Hot Water Systems: Systems include an automatic or accessible manual switch to turn off the circulating pump when the system is not in use. Pipes are insulated to R-3 when any one of the following apply: (a)piping serves more than one dwelling unit, (b)piping between water heater and kitchen or water heater and distribution manifold, (c) piping outside conditioned space, buried,or located under a floor slab, (d)supply and return piping in recirculation systems other than demand recirculation systems, (e)piping is>3/4 inch nominal diameter, (f) piping runs>30 feet having 3/8 inch max diameter, (9)piping runs>20 feet having 1/2 inch max diameter, (h)piping runs>10 feet having 3/4 inch max diameter, (i) piping runs>5 feet having max diameter within the run>3/4 inch. Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation: ❑ HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to R-3. HVAC piping insulation exposed to outdoor elements is protected from damage and shielded from solar radiation. Ventilation: ❑ Ventilation fans satisfy the following efficacy criteria: (1)Range hoods and in-line fan:2.8 cfm/watt. (2)Bath-/utility room with rated cfm>=10>and<90: 1.4 cfm/watt. (3)Bath-/utility room with rated minimum cfm>=90:2.8 cfm/watt. Swimming Pools and In-ground Spas: ❑ Heaters have an readily accessible on-off switch. 71 Heaters operating on natural gas or LPG have an electronic pilot light. Schedule-capable automatic on-off timer switches are installed on heaters and pumps. Exceptions: Where public health standards require continuous pump operation. Where pumps operate within solar-and/or waste-heat-recovery systems. ❑ Heated pools and spas have a vapor retardant cover. Exceptions: Covers are not required when 70%of the heating energy is from site-recovered energy or solar energy source. Lighting Requirements: FA Within permanently installed fixtures,75 percent contain only lamps that can be categorized as one of the following.Or,a minimum of 75 percent of all lamps within permanent fixtures can be categorized as one of the following: (a)Compact fluorescent (b)T-8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent (c)40 lumens per watt for lamp wattage<=15 (d)50 lumens per watt for lamp wattage>15 and<=40 (e)60 lumens per watt for lamp wattage>40 Exceptions: Low voltage lighting systems. ❑ Fuel gas lighting systems have electronic pilot lights. Other Requirements: ❑ Snow-and ice-melting systems with energy supplied from the service to a building shall include automatic controls capable of shutting off the system when a)the pavement temperature is above 50 degrees F, b)no precipitation is falling,and c)the outdoor temperature is above 40 degrees F(a manual shutoff control is also permitted to satisfy requirement V). Certificate: ❑ A permanent certificate is provided on or in the electrical distribution panel listing the predominant insulation R-values;window U-factors;type and efficiency of space-conditioning and water heating equipment;and results from any required duct system and Project Title: Resnick Residence Report date: 10/09/13 Data filename:J:\Jobs\2013-Jobs\13061.00-Resnick Residence\Mechanical\Calculations\Rescheck\13061-Rescheck.rck Page 5 of 6 building envelope air leakage testing.The certificate#does not cover or obstruct the visibility of the circuit directory label,service disconnect label or other required labels. NOTES TO FIELD:(Building Department Use Only) Project Title: Resnick Residence Report date: 10/09/13 Data filename:J:\Jobs\2013-Jobs\13061.00-Resnick Residence\Mechanical\Calculations\Rescheck\13061-Rescheck.rck Page 6 of 6 �J( 2012 IECC Energy Efficiency Certificate Insulation . Ceiling/Roof 66.00 Wall 30.00 Floor/Foundation 38.00 Ductwork(unconditioned spaces): Glass & Door Rating U-Factor SHGC Window 0.30 Skylight 0.35 Door 0.30 NA Heating &Cooling Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater: Building Air Leakage and Duct Test Results Building Air Leakage Test Results Name of Air Leakage Tester Duct Tightness Test Results Name of Duct Tester Name: Date: Comments: SECTION 16601 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 DESCRIPTION A. Provide all labor, materials and items of service required for the completion of a functional and unobtrusive lightning protection system in accordance with the Contract Documents. B. Related work specified in Division 16000: 1.2 STANDARDS A. Except as modified by governing codes and by the Contract Documents, comply with the latest recommendations of the following: 1. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. Master Label Code 96A. 2. NFPA Code No. 780. B. Certificates: Provide Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. Master C Label for attachment to the building. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. The system to be provided shall be the standard product of a manufacturer regularly engaged in the production of lightning protection systems and shall be the manufacturer's latest approved design. The equipment manufacturer shall also be a UL-listed and approved manufacturer. 1.4 COORDINATION Lightning Protection System 16601-1 Master Specification Resnick Residence — Vail Colorado 4/00 A. Ensure that installation including air terminals does not conflict with the operation of other rooftop systems. Where required provide alternate components such as spring mounted air terminals to accomplish this coordination. B. Coordinate location of Master C label mounting with Architect/Engineer. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Submit shop drawings and manufacturer's data for the following items in accordance with the Contract Documents: 1. Provide detailed shop drawings showing the exact location of each item of lightning protection equipment, the routing of conductors, location of ground rods and items to be bonded into the system, etc. Lightning Protection System 16601-2 Master Specification Resnick Residence — Vail Colorado 4/00 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 MANUFACTURERS A. Westdodd Lightning Protection Company B. Mr. Lightning (Independent Protection Co.) C. Heary Brothers D. AC Lightning Security E. Thompson Lightning Protection PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 TYPE OF SYSTEM A. Install all conductors and complementary parts in a concealed manner so completed work is unobtrusive and does not detract from appearance of the structure. B. All areas of flat roofs are to be cross run with this same size conductor cable so that no area larger than 50 feet by 150 feet remains unprotected. Mount points on cast copper bronze point bases and cable clips to the finished roof to avoid any roof penetrations. 3.2 AIR TERMINALS A. Locate required number of solid copper 112 inch outside diameter nickel tipped air terminals not less than 10 inches above the area protected at intervals (20 feet maximum) about the periphery of the structure and not less than 50 feet on center on cross roof runs. 3.3 CONDUCTORS Lightning Protection System 16601-3 Master Specification Resnick Residence — Vail Colorado 4/00 A. Conductors shall weigh 375 pounds (copper) per 1000 feet. Provide interconnect conductors. Provide at least six (6) electric paths to ground. Avoid an upward direction for lateral conductors interconnecting air terminals. Turn conductors with a radius of at least 8 inches at an included angle not more acute than a right angle. Space down conductors around building's periphery (maximum 100 feet) as evenly as permitted by architectural features, locations of terminals and grounds. 3.4 CONNECTORS AND FASTENERS A. Use approved connectors of proper electric and mechanical characteristics. B. Rigidly and permanently attach conductors and air terminals to the building with fasteners of proper strength and design. C. Cement conductors on flat roofs to avoid roof penetrations. D. All below ground connections to be of the cadweld type. Lightning Protection System 16601-4 Master Specification Resnick Residence — Vail Colorado 4/00 3.5 GROUNDING SYSTEM A. Ground electrodes shall be installed as required and all driven rods shall penetrate earth at least 10'-0". B. Interconnect lightning protection ground to other building ground systems. 3.6 GROUNDING OF METAL ELEMENTS A. Interconnect and ground to the condenser system metal drain covers, ventilators, vent stacks, pipes, roofing or siding, observation lights, spandrels, railings, ridge rolls, valleys, crickets, eaves troughs, downspouts, ladders, ducts, cold water supply piping, and any other metallic object or surface of a size presenting a capacitance hazard, or within 6 feet of any portion of the lightning protection system, including grade mounted items. END OF SECTION Lightning Protection System 16601-5 Master Specification Resnick Residence — Vail Colorado 4/00 I u rill-f;ntl,il.: (ILIItCchilic.1 Got - } `I oFtec IS HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 2, BLOCK 5, VAIL VILLAGE 8TH FILING 1027 PTARMIGAN ROAD VAIL, COLORADO JOB NO. 113 222A JULY 26, 2013 PREPARED FOR: TRIUMPH DEVELOPMENT ATTN: TRAVIS COGGINS 12 VAIL ROAD, SUITE 200 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 travis(atrium hdev.com Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Sprin-s 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY........................ _ I _ .................................... PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION................................................................................. - 1 - SITECONDITIONS................................................................................................... - 2 - GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS....................................................................................... - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION........................ SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.............................................. - 3 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... - 3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS......................................... - 4 - FOUNDATIONS.................................................................................................... - 4 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS........................................ - FLOORSLABS................................................................. - 6 - UNDERDRAINSYSTEM...................................................................................... - SITEGRADING .................................................................................................... - 7 - SURFACEDRAINAGE......................................................................................... - 7 - LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 8 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 AND S- SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Village 8h Filing, 1027 Ptarmigan Road, Vail, Colorado. The' project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Triumph Development, dated June 12, 2013. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The existing residence on the lot will be razed for construction of the new residence. The proposed residence will be a 2-story structure above a walkout lower level located as shown on Figure 1 with a sub-basement below the uphill, garage area about 17 feet deep. A swimming pool will be located outside of the building at the walkout level. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be fairly extensive with cut depths between about 10 to 18 feet. We assume relatively light to moderate foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. 113 222A GeCPt�Ch - 2 - SITE CONDITIONS The lot is.occupied with a 2-story residence possibly above crawlspace or basement and slab-on-grade floor in the garage. The ground surface is moderately sloping down to the northwest with about 10 feet of elevation difference across the building footprint. Vegetation consists of lawn, bushes and mature evergreen trees. The Vail Golf Course adjoins the north side of the lot. Gore Creek is located about 500 feet north of the lot. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The lot is located on alluvial deposits formed from coalescing fans of drainages that flow out of the south valley side. The official Town of Vail geologic hazard maps adopted in 2000 show Lot 2 to be outside of potential debris flow, snow avalanche and rockfall. Based on our review of the site, we concur that the lot is outside of the mapped hazards. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on June 26, 2013. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-4513 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. Job No. 113 222A G(�OFtech - 3 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 5 feet of loose silty sand with gravel and cobble fill overlying medium dense, silty to clayey sand with gravel and scattered cobbles. A sandy clayey silt layer within the sand soils was encountered at 14 feet in Boring 2, and silty sandy gravel and cobbles with possible boulders was encountered below the sand soils at a depth of 18 feet in Boring 2. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on drive samples of the fill and natural granular soils, shown on Figures 4 and 5 indicate the fill soils are highly compressible and the natural sand soils have low to moderate compressibility potential under conditions of loading and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 17 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The natural soils encountered on the lot are relatively dense granular soils and suitable for support of spread. footings. The upper fill soils can be erratic and should be removed from below the proposed building. Based on the proposed basement excavation for the new structure, we expect the existing fill and debris from prior site development will be removed but the suitability of the exposed soils should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings made on the lot and groundwater level rise that could impact the foundation construction is not expected. Job No. 113 222A C�Pfech - 4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. There could be potential for post-construction settlement under wetted conditions on the order of%2 to 1 inch. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 48 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. S) The existing fill, debris, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. 'The exposed soils in footing area should'then be moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, we should be contacted for evaluation and mitigation methods. Job No. 113 222A GecPtech - 5 - 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils and retained heights up to about 12 feet. Walls taller than 12 feet should be designed for a uniform earth pressure loading of 25H in psf where H is the retained wall height in feet. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90%of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The settlement potential can be reduced by use of a select granular material and compaction to at least 98% of standard Proctor density. Job No. 113 222A C�GCPt�Ch - 6 - The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 375 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2%passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times Job No. 113 222A G86'rtech - 7 - of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. A drywell (or perforated interior sump pit) can be used for disposal of potential drain water at the sub-basement level. We expect the percolation rate to be on the order of 20 minutes per inch and should be verified at the time of excavation. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Meet deep. SITE GRADING The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site appears low for relatively shallow cuts and fills up to about 10 to 12 feet deep. Fills should be limited to about S to 10 feet deep. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into slopes that exceed 20% grade. SURFACE DRAINAGE. Care should be taken to keep the bearing soils dry and Iimit the potential for settlement induced by wetting below the building. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: Job No. 113 222A GLcGtech - S - 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95%of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping that requires regular heavy irrigation and sprinkler heads should be kept at least 10 feet from the building foundation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the fixture. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions Job No. 113 222A G rkech - 9 - encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. f Steven L. Pawlak, P. 115222 Reviewed by; �q •� Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/ksw Job No. 113 222A C(�'trtech APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 301 TRACT D r _ 8250 f PROPOSED POOL 828`' LOT 1 / • BORI 2 LOT 3 EXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED I �p I LOT 2 RESIDENCE i BORING 1 "260 / 026 EXISTING PARKING AREA - -- f PTARMIGAN ROAD 113 222A HEPWORTH•PAWLAK� GEOTECHNICAL Cw LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 I BORING 1 BORING 2 ELEV.= 8259' ELEV.= 8256' 8260 8260 7 X 8255 12/12 X 8255 WC=6,9 X DD=115 X -200=20 6/12 WC=13.3 8250 DD=111 28/12 8250 WC=6.8 (3) H DD=105 .2) 28/12 Wc=6.8 8245 DD=109 15112 8245 WC=7.8 DD=118 APPROXIMATE LOWEST LEVEL 7/12 WC=20.6 8240 DD=102 16/12 8240 - WG=10.6 200=64 DD=119 d . r 36112 L 8235 8235 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. r 113 222A LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I-Figure 2 _11 11— I He 97-P&..I.k eG--Ct..thn 11 1 1 LEGEND: FILL; man-placed silty clayey sand with scattered gravel and cobbles, loose, slightly moist to moist, dark brown. QJ SAND (SM-SC); silty, clayey, scattered gravel and cobbles, clay layer at 14'in Boring 2, medium dense, slightly moist to moist with depth, mixed brown. d . GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM); possible boulders, sandy, silty, clayey, dense, moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. 28/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 28 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. 12 Indicates 2"diameter slotted PVC pipe installed in boring to depth shown. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on June 26, 2013 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 17 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve H 113 222A @C]'"� LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 He worth—Pawlak Geotechnicci Moisture Content= 10.6 percent Dry Density = 119 pof Sample of: Silty Clayey Sand with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 19 Feet 0 1 Compression upon 2 wetting c 0 U 2 3 CL E 0 U 4 5 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-kst 113 222A ~ Bch SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 He worth—Pawlak Geotechnfcol Moisture Content 13.3 percent Dry Density= ill pcf Sample of: Silty Clayey Sand with Gravel (Fill) From: Boring 2 at 4 Feet 0 1 Compression upon 2 1 11 wetting L 3 Q O U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf 113 222A He worth-Pawlak Geotechnical SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 N r r w a. z° .c 0Y 3 3 5 o � � � 78 '8 b ,� cn v� rn co r i � rA ai ai a�i ai >0 > �, u V U U U U U V Wax E:mo paUl C3.2 N �� Z J ,a Q W w L) g O)m V a w UJ z i- m n U F 0 w W 0 a 9a ) (F YW9 f-0 Q J O Zzoo LU w Q Q 2N0 N ably a LL z O a 0 Q o o Q. a LU _ CO 0 > : 0 N Z a JLF Z L o 0� 00 00 M 00 4R a 00 'c tc N Zzo z = IL LU V � O Lu I IL Z a 2 0 I lopwonh-Pawlak Geotedinical,Inc. 7020 CoUnty Rnad 154 ech l hon:97 -945-g5,C c l� rode R1(it�l Phone: �)71�-t)-}�-7)88 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL October 8, 2013 Ri,�:971-x)47-x;454 email: hpke,)@hpge�Jteth.eo111 Triumph Development Attn: Mike Foster 12 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 mike r trium hdev.corn Job No. 113 222A Subject: Additional Subsurface Exploration for Drywell Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 2, Block 5, Vail village 8'Filing, 1027 Ptarmigan Road, Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. conducted additional subsurface exploration at the subject site on September 27, 2013 to evaluate the subsurface profile for drywell design and support of the proposed swimming pool. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated July 26, 2013, Job No. 113 222A. The additional exploration was conducted according to our letter for additional services to Triumph Development dated September 25, 2013. A drywell is proposed in the northeast corner of the lot for disposal of underdrain water from the pool and residence, and possibly limited surface water sources. The drywell is proposed to discharge into coarse granular soils encountered below the upper, finer grained alluvial fan soils. A second drywell is proposed near the northwest lot corner. The subsurface exploration consisted of drilling Boring 3 near the northeast lot corner as shown on Figure 1 and conducting a percolation test in the completed borehole. The log of the boring is shown on Figure 2 and consists of about 19 feet of alluvial fan soils overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles with possible boulders to the drilled depth of 21 feet and practical auger refusal. The results of laboratory testing conducted on the samples taken from the borings are presented on Figure 4 and summarized in Table 1. The percolation test results are summarized in Table 2 and indicate a rate of about 2 minutes per inch. The soil conditions encountered in the additional boring are similar to those previously encountered on the lot. The coarse granular soils encountered below the upper, finer grained alluvial fan soils are suitable for drywell construction. A typical drywell detail is Parker 303-841-7119 0 Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 Triumph Development October 8, 2013 Page 2 shown.on Figure 5. The drywell should have a minimum diameter of 3 feet and be embedded into the underlying coarse granular soils at least 4 feet. We understand that it is tentatively proposed to drill a borehole about 4'/z feet in diameter for the drywell construction. We estimate the capacity of the well to be 24 gpm outflow plus the storage volume of the well below the inlet pipe. We should review the drywell capacity when the total estimated flow to the drywells has been determined. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E 9 16222 SLP/ksw NAIL OF �4►.4 Attachments: Figure I —Locatio of xploratory Borings Figure 2--Logs of Exploratory Borings Figure 3 —Legend and Notes Figure 4— Swell-consolidation Test Results Figure 5—Typical Drywell Detail Table I — Summary of Laboratory Test Results Table 2—Percolation Test Results cc: Berglund Architects—Adam Gilmer {adam ber lundarchitects.com RA Nelson— Jason Morley 'morle ranelson cam) Job No. 113 222A APPROXIMATE SCALE 11' = 30' TRACT D 8250 82`0 BORING 3 0 PROPOSED POOL 8285 LOT 1 / • BORING 2 LOT 3 ! EXSTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED I LOT 2 ,RESIDENCE i BORING 1 — '?6p , ^1 � f a X26 EXISTING i PARKING AREA PTARMIGAN ROAD LEGEND: 0 Boring for Current Study. • Boring from Previous Study, Dated July 26, 2013. H 113 222A 2%ch LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATOR=BORINGS FI I�IEFWORTH-PAWLAKGEQCURE 1 BORING 1 BORING 2 ELEV.= 8259' -80RING3 ELEV.= 8258' ELEV.= 8252 8260 5260 F8255 12/12 8255 WC=6.9 DD=115 -200=20 6/12 WC-13.3 8250 28/12 DD=111 POOL DECK, WC=6.8 ELEV.=8249.5' 8250 DD=105 LL 28112 16/12 8245 WC=6.8 WC-7.9 0 15/12 DD=109 DD=109 8245 LL wC=7.8 -200=51 cu DD=118 a w APPROXIMATE LOWEST LEVEL 7112 19/12 w WC-20.6 8240 16/12 DD=102 BOTTOM OF POOL, We=10.6 -200=64 ELEV.=8239.5' 8240 DD=119 °9a 18/12 8235 0" 36/12 we-16.5 DD=103 8235 -200=47 4 . °o•a 50/2 5230 8230 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. f�l 113 222A Cie Ptech LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS HE�WJRTH-PAWLAKGEOTEr_MNICAL GS FIGURE 2 LEGEND: VN FILL; man-placed silty clayey sand with scattered gravel and cobbles, loose, slightly moist to moist, dark brown. TOPSOIL; organic sandy clay, soft, moist,dark brown. SAND (SM-SC); silty, clayey, scattered gravel and cobbles, clay layer at 14'in Boring 2, medium dense,slightly moist to moist with depth,mixed brown. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM); possible boulders, sandy, silty,clayey, dense, moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch i.D, split spoon sample,ASTM D-1 P � 586. 28/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 28 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. IVIndicates 2" diameter slotted PVC pipe installed in boring to depth shown. TPractical auger drilling refusal. NOTES: 1. Exploratory Borings 1 and 2 were drilled on June 26, 2013. Exploratory Boring 3 was drilled on September 27,2013. The borings were drilled with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by intorpoiation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions maybe gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when Borings 1 and 2 were checked 17 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pct -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Hp Ll 222A c)tec LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Moisture Content — 7.9 percent Dry Density � 109 pct Sample of: Silty Sand and Clay 0 From: Boring 3 at 5 Feet 0 1 o Compression Cn upon 2 2 wetting 0- E 0 3 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf 100 Moisture Content = 16.5 percent Dry Density — 103 pct Sample of: Very Clayey Silty Sand 0 From: Boring 3 at 15 Feet 1 a c No movement 2 upon wetting E 0 3 CJ 4 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf 100 Hp 13 222A Ge)tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS EFIGURE HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 4] �9JRFACE GRATE SEE NOTE 1 r i'i!'af�I-if_!:a GFi�I�F _RACKFILL INLET PIPE STANDPfFE _ —° SEE NOTE SEE NOTE 6--- SEE NOTE 4�`ti 1 \ F SOLID RISER SEE NOTE I a / DRAIN GRAVEL FLIER FABRIC SEE NOTE 2�\ `� SEE NOTE 3 PERFORATED RING �\ SEE NOTE 1 44' a o o a o 0 0 u o 0 0 0 0 0 - •�4'Inl'rn] a o 0 0 0 6 q - � a: f � (Ellin) - 1 TYPICAL DRYWELL DETAIL NOT TO S(�t,LE NOTES; 1. Specified by others. Drywell structure should be safely accessible for periodic cleaning and maintenance. Solid riser sections should extend through the alluvial fan soils and perforated section should extend at least 4 feet into gravel and cobble soils. 2. a-inch screened rock, inside and outside of perforated ring section. 3. Mirafi 140N, or equivalent, placed on top of drain gravel on interior side of perforated ring section. 4. 4-inch diameter PVC pipe with slotted portion below top of drain gravel and solid up to about 3 feet above top of drain gravel and covered with trash screen. 5. Consisting of on-site soils compacted to at least 95%of standard Proctor density at a moisture content within 2%of Optimum on top of cone section and flow fill or clean sand in straight solid section. 6. 4-inch diameter non-perforated PVC pipe sloped at a 1%minimum from foundation and area drains to drywell (invert elevation by others). Hpp 113 222A ,( IS� h TYPICAL DRYWELL DETAIL F HEPWORTH-PAwLGECHMCAL IGURE 5 a N Cc c�C e�C M O N ew r LU m 0 x 3 3 LRd 00 rl uj rn rr} v) rs) � v "; w Cj .� cd W Lu z a LLJ Z V' CL Z J D0 J W U) px Z U W�— w � F UJIm O w O z �7 F- r Q W w ~Oo VyN� p Q J LU N n IL 9 -- IT 2 O O Q o a o Lo � � a a g ❑ W -� = U) 9 o c� X}r to co CN ti N o� m noz a �' •-+ o o a o a o Z Qxz it L e C\ 00 00 M 00 V1 0 U �p [� �p N t�D Gt Qt Ln kn LU Q --a U � O UJ r O Q- z U) 0 1-4 N M 00 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 113 222A HOLE NO. HOLE LENGTH OF WATER WATER DROP IN AVERAGE DEPTH INTERVAL DEPTH AT DEPTH AT WATER PERCOLATION (FEET) (MIN) START OF END OF LEVEL RATE INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (MINANCH) (FT-IN) (FT-iN) B-3 21 5 5'-10" 5'-2" 8 0.6 5'-2" 4'-9" 5 1.0 41„9» 4'-671 3 1.7 K27-97) 4'-3" 3 1.7 3'-11" 4 1.3 3'-7" 4 1.3 3'-4" 3 1.7 3'-175 3 1.7 2'-9)) 4 1.3 2'-6" 3 1.7 Note: The percolation test was performed in the borehole through 1% inch diameter slotted PVC pipe following completion of drilling on September 27, 2013.