The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB13-0377 � Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado USA 81657 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Title 10, Section 10-1-2, ADOPTED CODES of the Vail Town Code certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was found to be substantially in compliance with the various ordinances of the town regulating building construction or use for the following: New Single Family House Name and description of project 1000 Spraddle Creek Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Address of vroiect: Michael M. Noell Revocable Truct 1000 Spraddle Creek Road Vail Colorado 81658 Owner name and address: 2012 I RC R3/U VB IBC Edition: Occupancy Group(s): Type(s)of Construction: B13-0377 Permit Number(s): Occupant Load: Martin Haeberle,Chief Building Official Yes Sprinkler System Y/N Type:_ 09/04/2015 Date ._ --�- I / \ 09-03-2015 Inspection Request Reporting Page 1 3.58 qm VSiI, CQ - Citv Of Requested Inspect Date: Friday,September 04 2015 Site Address: 1000 SPRADDLE CRE�EK RD VAIL AKA 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK ROAD A/P/D Information Activity: B13-0377 Type: COMBO Sub Type: NSFR Status: ISSUED Const Type: Occup ancy: Use: R-3 Insp Area: Owner: MICHAEL M.NOELL REVOCA6LE TRUST Contractor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970-949-1800 Applicant: MICHAEL M.NOELL REVOCABLE TRUST Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Comment: E-SUBMITTAL structural revisions-CGODFREY Comment: E-CR1 RECEIVED.-DRHOADES Comment: I forgot to assess the rec fee. Contacted Mike Foster and he is to obtain a check for the balance-MHAEBERLE Comment: E-REV1 RECEIVED-FOUNDATIONS SECTIONS.-SBELLM Comment: Contacted Mike Foster to get Rev 1 plans stamp ed-MHAEBERLE Comment: E-REV1 CR1 RECEIVED.STAMPED STRUCTURAL PLANS. EMAIL SENT TO MARTIN ADVISING RECEIVED.-DRHOADES Comment: Blower door report routed to laserfiche and MH-CGODFREY Comment: e-submittal REV2 Updated Structural Sheets-scanned to laserfiche-CGODFREY Comment: CUODFREYd Nail Wall Testing,Opne hole test x 3 received.scanned to laserfiche and routed to JRM- Comment: e-submmital REV3 structural sheets.routed to laserfiche-CGODFREY Comment: Released DIA-New World-6/17/14 to Michael Noell(B13-0268)-SBELLM Comment: ILC'S ROUTED TO WARREN-JMONDRAGON Comment: emailed Triumph REV1 ready for pickup-MHAEBERLE Requested Inspection(s) Item: 534 PLAN-FINAL C/O Requested Time: 08:15 AM Requestor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY Phone: 970-949-1800 Comments: 904-1283 Assigned To: GRUTHER Entered By: JMONDRAG Action: Time Exp: i Item: 540 BLDG-Final C/O Requested Time: 01:00 PM � Requestor: BECK BUILDING COMPANY �' �� Phone: 970-949-1800 Comments: 904-1283 Assigned To: JMONDRAGON � Entered By: JMON O Action: Time Exp �� v Inspection Historv Item: 502 PW-Rough Driveway Grade "Approved" 06/10715 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 503 PW-Final Driveway Grade *'Approved" 07/30/15 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 532 PW-TEMP.C/O *'Approved`* 07/30/15 Inspector: Is Action: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 539 PW-FINAL C/O "Approved"' 07/30/15 Inspector: Is Action: DN DENIED Comment: Not Ready,W ill stop by on Monday,August 3,2015 08/25/15 Inspector: Is Acfion: AP APPROVED Comment: Item: 10 BLDG-FOOTING '*Approved" 11/14/13 Inspector: mdenney Action: AP APPROVED Comment: North mam house, master wing-keywa y,footings. 12/19/13 Inspector: sgremmer Acfion: PT PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: qrid line 6 between E and A and connection wall footin 02/19/14 fnspector: sgremmer Action: PI PAR�AL INSPECTION Comment: swimming pool and crawl space footings 03/26/14 Inspector: , sgremmer , Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: interior footing at mstr wing 04/14/14 inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: slab insulation at grid-line 17-19,Q.5 to R.5 04/16/14 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: radon barrier in rotunda area. 04/16/14 Inspector: mdenney Action: PI PARTIAL INSPECTION Comment: Footings and pads at grid lines M to H and 10 to 20 REPT131 Run Id: 15013 4) 1\-3 - tr?D7-7" 1 is Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. Vail • Denver October 15,2014 Triumph Custom Homes 12 Vail Road Suite 700 Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Mike Foster Re: Noell Residence at 1000 Spraddle Creek Road Vail, Colorado (M&N#9156.00) Gentlemen; Monroe&Newell Engineers, Inc. observed the framing during construction. To the best of our knowledge and belief, based on our visual observations, and the information provided to us,theframing appears to be constructed in compliance with the intent of the construction documents prepared by our office and approved by the Building Department. If you have any questions or comments,please call. Very truly yours, MONROE &NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. 641"1L .rrr►rrrr.Rr.+ ' 0 REG/.... ,' Q:',C, g A'Q . •�% Craig oll, P.E. r 0 fr,T 4`' Princi 1 . v;o 260 I -.........•••' 1\IA I \t\ www.monroe-newell.com 1400 Glenarm • Suite 101 • Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 623-4927 • FAX (303) 623-6602 • email: denver @monroe-newell.com Monroe&Newell Engineers,Inc. Structural Engineers veil•lknver.Frisco Denver Office 1400 Glenarm Place,Suite 101,Denver,CO 80202 (303)623-4927 Phone(303)623-6602 Fax denver @monroe-newell.com DATE: July 24th,2014 JOB NUMBER: 9156.00 PROJECT: Noel!Residence LOCATION:Vail, CO To: Triumph Custom Homes ATTN: Mike Foster REPORT BY: Craig Carroll&Jacob Fehler THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE VISIT WAS: The purpose of this site visit was to observe framing on the roof and main floor. THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: 1. Continuous columns at the main stairway need to have bracing to wood floor members as discussed. 2. All Versa-Lam valleys and ladder framing girders need to be packed out at top plate to allow for full bearing. 3. The valleys over the exercise room require(2)3/4"thru-bolts on each side at transfer beam.Currently only(1)bolt on each side is installed. 4. Where valleys terminate at steel beams over the kitchen area,this requires(2)3/4" thru-bolts to the beam(match the current east side connection). 5. At the Rotunda floor framing,connect 8x8's to double VL by lagging through VL with(2)5/8"diameter x 8"long lags at each 8x8. 6. At the Rotunda floor framing on the north side,the installed Simpson HHUS5.50/10 hanger is acceptable. 7. Maximum 5"round holes may be drilled into W14 steel beams at the crawlspace south of rotunda.Keep homes in middle 1/3 of beam and as close to middle 1/3 of flange as possible.Keep holes a minimum 3'-0"from edge of pizza oven above. Reduce hole size where applicable.Contact FOR if criteria cannot be met. i° NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS NOTED Jacob Fehler, E.I.T. Project Engineer AIA Colorado A Component of The American Institute 01 Architects Platinum Sponsor 16 Consecutive Years 037- Th West Slope Testing& Inspection LLC Report #3 3 177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Page 1 of 1 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Final Inspection Report Date: 8-16-14 Client: HP Geotech (Job #HP 113 048C) Project: Noell Residence Address: 1000 Spraddle Creek Rd. Vail, CO Building Permit No: B 13-0377 General Contractor: Beck Building Company Contractor that Performed Work: Christensen Welding Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report: Received/reviewed some photos of the A325 high strength bolting at the two connections for the steel beam that was installed after my last site visit on 7-8- 14 roof level framing grids M/18.6 & P/18.6. The A325 high strength bolting reviewed above appeared to be in substantial conformance with the plans, and the requirements of the AISC/RCSC Specification for A325/A490 bolting. To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspections of the structural steel onsite welding & A325 high strength bolting, as outlined in reports #1 thru #3 on the project. Note no ultrasonic testing was performed, as there were no complete joint penetration moment welds performed onsite. ' uglas F.Young wrgo Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young ` Cert natio 51022 ctur Weld' g Spec'. r c I teel liolting S "ia Inspector Spray-applied Fireproofing 'l ecial Inspector I I G( H otech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK ULUILCHNICAL April 17, 2014 Triumph Development Attn: Mike Foster 12 Vail Road Hepworth- Pawkik Oentechmc ;dl Inc. i.j20 rmod 154 C�len�euc�l `prin;�. Colorado S1 (,01 Pk inr: 1170-94i -79�ti Fax: 970 -945 -6354 rm.lil: hI)g"e' "11pueotech.con) 7e-7 Vail, Colorado 81657 (r�iil;ef(r�triunlplidev com) Job No. 113 048C Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Southern and Eastern Portion of Main House and Northern Portion of Garage, Proposed Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical observed the partial excavation at the subject site on April 11 and 15, 2014 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April 15, 2013, Job No. 113 048A. We have observed the footing area excavations for other portions of the residence and garage and reported our findings under the above job number. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our subsoil study report. The locations for the residence we observed were for the south and east walls along Line 12 between N.5 and H, and along H line between 12 and 20, as well as the interior crawlspace footing pads in this area. The locations for the garage we observed were the north wall along Line 4 from E to about B.5 Lines. Spread footings bearing on the natural coarse granular soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf were recommended for foundation support in our previous report. On April 11, we observed the above residence excavation areas for the continuous walls to be cut at two levels from about 6 to 15 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of relatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel with cobbles and boulders. In the crawlspace area, the footing pad areas were at grade on a few feet of compacted structural fill previously tested to be about 100% standard Proctor compaction. On April 15, we observed the north garage wall foundation excavation to be cut at one level about 5 feet below the adjacent ground surface with relatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel with cobbles and boulders exposed in the bottom. No free water was encountered in the excavations and the soils were generally to moist. Parker 303 - 541 -7110 • Colorado Springs 719 -633 -556? • Silwerthorne 970 -468 -1989 Triumph Development April 17, 2014 Page 2 The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. The structural fill should be adequate to support the footing pads in the crawlspace area. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas and the subgrade compacted as needed. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK G' O4 NICAL, INC. RlC David A. Young, P.E. ? 2i8 DAY /ksw iir�*S'`� 'RIVAL cc: Triumph Development — Travis Coggin (travis triumnhdev cam) Beck Building Company — Tom Solawetz UM@beckbuilds.com ) Beck Building Company — Kevin Fifield (kevinfnbeckbuilds com) Beck Building Company — Kevin Fifield (al(beckbuilds com) RMT Architects — Paul Miller (p aul inntarchiteets cam) Monroe & Newell - Craig Carroll (ccanall rr monroe-newell com) Job No. H 3 048C G(~Stech NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBS/TE AT ALL TIMES ,. �a�vo�v�; . Town of Vail, Community Development, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 p. 970.479.2139, f. 970.479.2452, inpsections 970.479.2149 COMBINATION BLDG PERMIT Permit #: B13-0377 Project #: PRJ13-0081 Job Address: 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK RD VAIL Applied.....: 09/09/2013 Location......: AKA 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK ROAD Issued. . . : 03/2512014 Parcel No....: 210105301006 OWNER MICHAEL M. NOELL REVOCABLE T 09/09/2013 971 SPRADLE CREEK RD VAI L CO 81657 CONTRACTOR BECK BUILDING COMPANY 09/09/2013 Phone: 970-949-1800 780 NOTTINGHAM ROAD, AVON PO BOX 4030 VAI L CO 81658 License: C000003131 APPLICANT MICHAEL M. NOELL REVOCABLE T 09/09/2013 971 SPRADLE CREEK RD VAI L CO 81657 Description: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Occupancy: R-3 Type Construction: VB Valuation: $9,138,234.00 ..............,.,....,...«...,.........,.......,,,.>...,.�...,.,,..,.,............. FEE SUMMARY ,.,.,..�...,...,.......,..............,........,,,...........,..«......,....... Building Permit-----------> $35,316.10 Bldg Plan Check----------> $22,955.47 Use Tax Fee-----------------------> 182,564.68 Electrical Permit---------> $1,575.50 Elec Plan Check-----------> $1,024.08 Restuarant Plan Review--------> $0.00 Mechanical Permit------> $4,900.00 Mech Plan Check---------> $1,225.00 Additional Fees--------------------> $0.00 Plumbing Permit--------> $5,595.00 Plmb Plan Check---------> $1,398.75 Recreation Fee--------------------> $1,250.00 I nvestigation-----------------------> $0.00 Will Call------------------------------> $20.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES--------------> 258,154.58 Payments-------------------------------> 258,154.58 BALANCE DUE------------------------> $0.00 ....................,....,..,......��......,.....................................,.......>__.....................x.......,.....x.................x..,........,.....,.x..,................ DECLARATIONS I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 970.479.2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM -4:00 PM. combination permit_012811 � _ , � i�Y�4fi �� j . .w.�+++.w+.�+.x++rw..+.xxx�+.r.«+.+.xx+x.x...+w�x�s..re:rr.»��xw.+n.+.+.x�x.wx..+.:�wwx.w..�<x,r..wxw�+�..wxxxxx�+.w.:..��s.+�.»xxs.,r:r:rv..+.+.,r.�.....:r:.x...x�x�....��s....wr�ww++rf��..+wx�xx,r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL SIGN OFF � Permit#: 613-0377 Address: 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK RD VAIL Owner: MICHAEL M. NOELL REVOCABLE TRUST Location: AKA 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK ROAD ........................................................>...........,.....,,...........,....................�..............,......x,...,..............,.......,....................,. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 34 (BLDG.): A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A FOOTING INSPECTION WILL BE CALLED FOR. Cond: CON0013437 combination permit_012811 a � �� i� � ***.*�««***.*****«**«*.,*********,,.+,*�**.******x*�******«**«*****«.***«****««*********************.*�«**„**«*******„**************«««********„******** REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND STATUSES Permit#: 613-0377 Address: 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK RD VAIL Owner: MICHAEL M. NOELL REVOCABLE TRUST Location: AKA 1000 SPRADDLE CREEK ROAD ***.******�******..****«„***�******�*«*******************««***********.*********,�*************„**********««.�*******«„*„�****,.***«„*�*«********,,.,**«* Item: 00501 PW-Access/Staging/Erosion Item: 00502 PW-Rough Driveway Grade Item: 00503 PW-Final Driveway Grade Item: 00532 PW-TEMP. C/O Item: 00539 PW-FINAL C/O Item: 00010 BLDG-FOOTING 11/14/2013 By: mdenney Action: AP Comments: North main house, master wing -keyway footings. 12/19/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: grid line 6 between E and A and connection wall footing 02/19/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: swimming pool and crawl space footings Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel 12/02/2013 By: shane Action: PI Comments: grid line 2 tp Q.5 01/02/2014 By: sgremmerAction: PI Comments: grid line 6 between E and A plus connection wall 01/09/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: damp proofing Grid M to SW mstr 01/23/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: North East portion of perimeter drain 03/05/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Grid lines T to O all at SW corner 03/12/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: west stair case and crawl space walls Item: 00210 PLMB-Underground 01/15/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: perimeter drain grid line M to South corner of mstr bed 03/25/2014 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: Lower Mstr wing Item: 00021 PLAN-ILC Foundation Plan Item: 00120 ELEC-Rough Item: 00200 MECH-Rough Item: 00220 PLMB-Rough/D.W.V. Item: 00230 PLMB-Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB-Gas Piping 12/19/2013 By: sgremmer Action: PI Comments: temp gas line inspection Item: 00315 PLMB-Gas Piping Item: 00022 PLAN-ILC FRAMING Item: 00410 Special Inspect-progress rept 02/19/2014 By: JRM Action: AP Comments: SOILS REPORT AND PERMANENT GROUND NAIL WALL SCANNED TO FILE Item: 00420 Special Inspect-final rept Item: 00290 PLMB-Final combination permit_012811 Item: 00190 ELEC-Final Item: 00390 MECH-Final Item: 00533 PLAN-TEMP. C/O Item: 00534 PLAN - FINAL C/O Item: 00090 BLDG-Final Item: 00540 BLDG-Final C/O Item: 00110 ELEC-Service 10/21/2013 By: sgremmerAction: PI Comments: Temp service combination permit_012811 °'�� "�� Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road T�'�� F ��:�;,.'; va�i, co s�ss7 Te l: 970.479.2128 www.vailgov.com Development Review Coordinator TRANSM ITTAL FORM Use this form when submitting additional information for planning applications or building permits. This form is also used for requesting a revision to building permits. A two hour minimum building review fee of$110 will be charged upon reissuance of the permit. _. ..._........_......................... ............ __........................................_.......__.............................._.......................................................................................... Application/Permit#(s)information applies to: Attention: �Revisions � /.� ��-� �Response to Correction Letter aftached copy of correction letter P6 ��Deferred Submittai �� `'Q �� Other ....................................................................................................................................................................................: Project Street Address: ' Ci .l"i�� 1`J�G��C/C`� �� (Number) (Street) (Suite#j ; BuildinglComplex Name: < Description of TransmittaU List of Changes, Items Attached: 'f"' ��' �� fi _.. ... ....... ��r-�..:�- -' ;!Applicant information :(architect,contractor,owner/owner's rep} �� Contact Name: �e 1�I� ��b' Address �%��' �'City State: Zip: Contact Name: ��V �✓L �j��G ' ! (use additional sheet if necessary) � <. .._ ,.::. _..:.::< >::::: !Contact Phone: ��" �C�t�"" � Building Perm�ts: `Revised ADDITIONAL Valuations (Labor&Materials) !:Contact E-MaiL �i�lr" I+'�� -�✓�c'�'� k7��S•C�s�O NOT include original valuation} .�.... s I hereby acknow(edge that I have read this application,filled out ;Building: $ ' in fuA the information required,completed an accurafe plot plan, and state fhat all the information as required is correct. I agree to : Plumbing: $ ; comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ': : ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according !;Electrical: $ ' to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- ; proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other MechanicaL $ 6G ordinances of the Town ap f e ereto. ;X ` ` "'_� Total: $� : ;:Owne Owner's epresentative Signature(Required) .......................................................................................................................................................................................: Date Received: n � � � LI � � V For Office Use Onic: �� A Fee Paid: `f 2015 Received From: c�sr, Check# TOWN OF VAIL CC: Visa/MC Last 4 CC# exp.date: Authorization# � � � � M � � D - ; �c��.�T�-� JUL 2 4 2015 � � � �:�TER(�IE.�',x�. TOWN OF VAIL � N i ence ina ower poor Report Test Date: July 21, 2015 Builder: Beck Building Company Contact: Kevin Fitfield Address: 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail Site Visit By: Kristen Hartel Report By: Kristen Hartel Active Energies conducted a blower door test and thermal infrared imaging on Tuesday, July 21, 2015 from 6:30 am to 7 am. The Town of Vail requires that all new homes must meet or exceed the requirements of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code(IECC), which requires that air leakage within the home does not exceed 3 ACH50. Air leakage The home was depressurized to the standard -50 Pa of pressure, and a leakage of 5,675 CFM@50 was projected. The ACH50 the rating used by the Town of Vail building code and requirements, was calculated to be 2.65. Please call with any questions or concerns. Thank you. K,risten �arte� ACTIVE ENERGIES, INC. 970-306-4248 Kristen(a�ActiveEnergies.com www.activeenergi e s.com Page 1 of 1 7/23I2015 P.O.Box 7627,Avon,CO 81620 � P: 970.306.4233 � F: 866.403.3485 ( www.activeenergies.com � � J �lJ�� - � � C��M�R D ,!; AC'�i�I�'E ,JUi� 2 4 2015 i I�� i�ERtxIESr�. ,� ; 7 Noe °akage Report Test Date: July 21,2015 Builder: Beck Building Company Contact: Kevin Fitfield Address: 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail Site Visit By: Kristen Hartel Report By: Kristen Hartel Active Energies conducted final Duct Leakage Testing for the residence at 201 West Hallam on Monday, December 16, 2013. Only FC-7 was tested, which is the only system with ductwork in unconditioned space. Construction was completed with only finishing interior touches remaining. The Town of Vail requires that all new homes must meet or exceed the requirements of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code(IECC), which requires that losses within the duct system do not exceed 4 cubic feet per minute(cfm) for every 100 square feet of conditioned space served by each duct system. Only duct systems with portions in unconditianed space are required to meet the IECC requirement. Duct Leakate FC-7 was tested for duct leakage, and a leakage of 3.6 cfm per 100 square feet of conditioned floor area served was projected. Kristen �arte� ACTIVE ENERGIES, INC. 970-306-4248 Kristen(a�ActiveEnergies.com www.activeenergies.com Page 1 of 1 7/23/2015 P.O.Box 7627,Avon,CO 81620 � P: 970.306.4233 ( F: 866.403.3485 � www.activeenergies.com a � TOWNOF VAIL ' FINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Projecf: !`��C-�� (<.�''S 1 (� eVt L,�,,.,. Permit Number. � ► � "�� Project Location: t t�7 �,p('u�,('� '�„ �e'�r� �� Owner Y'' `� ��L' �� `L' � � !_ - Address jn0� `7�f��lG t..�'CG�C J�.�City: � Zi � �bJ`�� --�� p: Design Professional In Charge: � �/1��__��-�-�� Address: ��.'� h �, -T�y' C�ry��L`��p 7 << State: t.-fJ Zip: �Phone:��5�� Fax: Q"'�� f� E-rnail: `t�'-- ��--�'`• GC�m.. To the best of my information, knowledge, and belief, the special inspections and/or festing required for this projecf, have been completed in accordance with the contract documenfs. Interim reports submifted prior to this Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for,and are to be considered an integral part of this final report, Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim reports have been corrected. r--'-- Prepared by; ��'"'�" ' " --�"n � � �:v ; , r .�'�• ` s � l.t.YI. �'J`" <��y ' ,� tlJ� p!w* b T e or rint Name �,,, ? +�*� +=' �,ry w iti7�^sY�»�� " '�:r < e ��A/i��ti �'~9�'f��'t Signature �j0'ia�'r' �°�rnsf�o��M1!„�'�,.z;� 7- 30 -r °r,��`�'s��N�:a��'� Date Preparer's Seal and Signature Required ��'°C. !a�, t tr+.�� ` rg,.�t,5 �' /`� .�0 t�t.yti Q�q,�`',p y�„ '`�e+� � � ,�j�G.✓' t ✓� � .�+.�,k �'� l,l. �'£�rn, t�G,,,-��P r�t. � C� �G�`� �,. • �c�, ( V1 A ; I � /� � (1 �(.�C" �I�l D`f"C,..,T�,,. }�? j C�C�.- `"J�Y G(C..`{Zt. f Gt � �� D �l V lC� G� � R�j' G�v�.� �o u l (�,,,,2_c'" �G -� � vt t r. 1.�19 a �� ( � �.(�`�.S'�7�.c- �� c� v� , tJn � f '"��° � �37� West Slope Testing& Inspection LLC � Report#3 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Page 1 of 1 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Final Inspection Report Date: 8-16-14 Client: HP Geotech(Job #HP 113 048C) Project: Noell Residence Address: 1000 Spraddle Creek Rd. Vail, CO Building Permit No: B13-0377 General Contractor: Beck Building Company Contractor that Performed Work: Christensen Welding Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report: Received/reviewed some photos of the A325 high strength boltmg at the two connections for the steel beam that was insta.11ed after my last site visit on 7-8- 14 roof level framing grids M/18.6 & P/18.6. The A325 high strength bolting reviewed above appeared to be in substantial conformance with the plans, and the requirements of the AISC/RCSC Specification for A325/A490 bolting. To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspections of the structural steel onsite welding& A325 high strength bolting, as outlined in reports #1 thru#3 on the proj ect.Note no ultrasonic testing was performed, as there were no complete joint penetration moment welds performed onsite. ugiss�.Yauag Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young Ce �catio 51022 tr ctur Weld" g Spec' 1 r c 1 teel $olting S ia lnspector Spray-appiied Fireproofing ecial Inspector � Boulder ' Denver Winter Park STRUCTURAL �ldG1NEERtNG 10/3/14 Brent Flot Hydro-Dynamic Services Brent Flot ' 890 N 9th Ave ,�' Brighton, CO 80603 Reference: 2013-0328: Noell Pool 1000 Spraddle Creek Road Vail, CO Dear Mr. Flot, At your request, a representative from our firm visited the above referenced project on 10/3i14, for the purpose of observing the reinforcing steel for the pool and spa. We found the reinforcement was i� general conformance to the construction documents prepared by our firm. It is a pieasure to work with you on this project and we look forward to its successful completion. Please feel free to contact our office if you haver�r��!,f�r.ther questions or concerns regarding these matters. ��\\�'�",.'_�' :,1fjf;. 41\• ,`� ��^j l{;< Sincerely, :� ��.,9,.x.r, ��'�`r%� � Y° . •i � 4� �s-`�%f:\i!p '� �' i ��*' �jy-� _ �_��°S�tj� �y"` � � .G%� �" / �'�(� :l� �4: [3{ � Matthew K. Berry PE = .� '� 3; �� ' `` ti` Principal �;'��'�-� ��s�'��`'� � . ., ��C�\�`�. . ,:�.l, �--,:. -z��,ONF�.�.. ;�� -i:'.%i/!!!!llitEll1111E,��: ASCENT GROUP, i NC. • 4909 Pearl East Circle, Suite 201 • Boulder,CO 80301 • 303.499.3022 • fax 303.499.3032 i � � i�_r—a l� � r., d � � Monroe&Newell � Enginrers,lac. � Srrucrural Engincers O �•�a•�h��.rs•r�cx�, �y /�' Denver Office �] 1400 Glenarm Place,Suite 101,Denver,CO 80202 (303)623-4927 Phone(303)623-6602 Faac denver@monroe-newell.com DATE: July 24�",2014 JOB NUMBER: 9156.00 PROJECT: Noell Residence LOCATION:Vail, CO To: Triumph Custom Homes ATT1v: Mike Foster REPOxT BY: Craig Carroll&Jacob Fehler THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE VISIT WAS: The purpose of this site visit was to observe framing on the roof and main floor. THE F LLOWING WAS NOTED: / (,/f9 Continuous columns at the main stairway need to have bracing to wood floor i/ members as discussed. 2. All Versa-Lam valleys and ladder framing girders need to be packed out at top plate to allow for full bearing. 3. The valleys over the exercise room require(2)'/"thru-bolts on each side at transfer �' beam.Currently only(1)bolt on each side is installed. �/ 4. Where valleys terminate at steel beams over the kitchen area,this requires(2)'/d" thru-bolts to the beam(match the current east side connection). � At the Rotunda floor framing,connect 8x8's to double VL by lagging through VL with(2)5/8"diameter x 8"long lags at each 8x8. 6. At the Rotunda floor framing on the north side,the installed Simpson HHUS5.50/10 hanger is acceptable. �1.' Maximum 5"round holes may be drilled into W14 steel beams at the crawlspace south of rotunda.Keep homes in middle 1/3 of beam and as close to middle 1/3 of tlange as possible.Keep holes a minimum 3'-0"from edge of pizza oven above. Reduce hole size where applicable.Contact EOR if criteria cannot be met. NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS NOTED Jacob Fehler, E.I.T. Project Engineer �.��- � � �o[orado A Component oi The Amerlcan InstiWta o1 Arcn�dacis Platinum Sponsor 16 Consecutive Years g 5 �o �. s ;� ,§ �,? i + Monroe 8� Newell Engineers, Inc. Vail • Denver October 15, 2014 Triumph Custom Homes 12 Vail Road Suite 700 Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Mike Foster Re: Noell Residence at 1000 Spraddle Creek Road Vail, Colorado (M&N#9156.00) Gentlemen; Monroe&Newell Engineers,Inc. observed the framing during construction. To the best of our knowledge and belief, based on our visual observations, and the information provided to us,theframing appears to be constructed in compliance with the intent of the construction documents prepared by our office and approved by the Building Department. If you have any questions or comments,please call. Very truly yours, MONROE&NEWELL ENGINEERS,INC. :�'y�r��r�� {'�f`.7�4•�� ,�' Craig C oll,P.E. r� �� Princi 1 ` �`U 2�'a `�' "ti�j: .�U �� ' �ti� � °� ,�� www.monroe-newell.com 1400 Glenarm ♦ Suite 101 • Denver, Colorado R0202 (303) 623-4927 • FAX (303) 623-6602 • email: denver�monroe-newell.com . � � � �� ;` � a1�.—r--+— 4�1 �' l � ' ' � Monroe&Newell � F.ngineen.Inc � $tructural I:nginrers O Vufl•tkn.�r,�•Fiix.. Denver Office y 1400 Glenarm Place,Suite 101,Denver,CO 80202 (303)623-4927 Phone(303)623-6602 Fax denver@mon roe-newell.com DATE: September 23rd,2014 JoB Nu�Ex: 9156.00 PRO.1ECr: Noell Residence LOCATION:Vail, CO TO: Triumph Custom Homes AT'r1v: Mike Foster REPORT BY: Jacob Fehler THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE VISIT WAS: The purpose of this site visit was to observe framing on the roof and main floor. Previous framing observations have been addressed and/or completed. (3)2x12 headers supported by(2)2x6 trim studs will be used to support stone arches that are to be constructed in the openings above the main stairway.The trim studs will either be continuous to the floor or will be braced at the l St floor framing with a CS 16 strap. The south deck has an acceptable substitution of(3)Versa-Lams instead of the Glu-Lams that are on the construction documents. All other framing appeared to be in general conformance with construction documents. NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS NOTED Jacob Fehler, E.I.T. Project Engineer �- � � � Co[orado A Component oi The American Institute oi Architects Platinum Sponsor 16 Consecutive Years �� d� �� d�� ` �� , .�;: � �� - .�� 3� � , ��t=.�� . r1..-. 7f: - t ':i+,�... (.��'r`'' l�.��t°t`:_� �;�:tV:.l��; ii��i�t.,�#°{��I� �`-.i. January 9, 2014 Triuinph Development Attn: Mike Faster 12 Vail Road Vaii, Colorado 81657 � ' ;;�:"� ':.ii��rci,:� .�~i,;;,) Job No. 113 048C Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Garage Area, Noell Residcnce, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Mike: As z�equested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the partial excavation at the subject site on December 17, 2013 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recotrui�endations for the foundation design are presented in tlus report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April I5, 2013, Job No. 1 l 3 048A. We obse�ved the footing area excavation for the Master Bedroom area at the residence and presented our observations in a Ietter dated Noveniber 12, 2013. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our subsoil study report. The cut to the north side of the building area has been retained with a soil nail wall_ The north Garage footings excavation adjacent to the bottom of the soil nail wall a��d eonnecting footings excavation from the west side of the Garage to the residence had been dug at this time and were located along Grid Lines A - E, 4- 6 and Grid Lines E-H on Line#20, respectively. Spread footings bearing on the natural coarse granular soils designed for an allowable Uearina pressure of 3,000 psf were recoinmended for foundation support in our previous report. At the time of our visit to the site, tl�e foundatian excavation for the above area had been cut in generally two levels from about 4 to 6 feet below the adjacent ground surfaee. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavations consisted of relatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel with cobbles and boulders. Nv free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to�noist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those�reviously encountered on tlie site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Loose and disturbecl soils should b�removed in the footing areas to eYpose the undisturbed natural coarse granulat-soils � � - I'��r:rt� ��t3-t��##-i l l'�1 � l'ui�>rsi�i�� i, � ��,, -` ,� --: , � r�n,�> r l�-Cj>�-��t>y . ;�il�•c�rtl�z:�rt�� i�ti�-�}tit`�-It);tit) _ .. , Triumph Development January 9, 2014 Page 2 and the subgrade compacted. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Other recommendations presented in out• previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recominendations sut�mitted in this letter ar�based on our�bservatiar, af the sails exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface explaration at the site. Vat�iations in the subsurface conditions below the excavatian could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recoinmendations contained in this Ietter. If you ha�=e any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPV�ORTH—PAWLAK GEOT HNICAL, ING �,c�n_t�eF ��,,�5 a. P�,, � �, James A. Parker, P.E., 1'.G. � 4'��$� � . ��., ' ,o ,y�,� . Rev. by: DAY ., ,- .c�;- �a �S��AtAI tiNU JAP/ksw cc: Triumph Development—Travzs Coggins( ,;jti j,fti�.t�-��},j��ir v.�crru) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(r��,�i�zt'�(��;��_�,ti�l�yi,� t��i) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(:��ti it�,;��,(54, �;t�ui_Ic[w.��.�ti7) RMT Architects—Paul Miller(. .:,��d #;;_�.,,�,�) iob rro_ i i�oasc GecPtech . � ��-�� [_1 11�,,,�,< <�,�.('�,,� 4� i �:�.: . .. �.. �.... � 50'��C ntiuts t�n i 1 1 iy �\r�I�11�/►� C,le�n��,�1 w�,ri�i�s C:r,loe.ad��c�lE�t�l Pl�iaire:�71�-�)4S-19�+� HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHN{CAL ��.q��,g{;_��y:� ;�n,iil:l ��'.�,%ci�� ,��_�ch.c:�,n: November 12, 2013 Triumph Development Attn: Mike Foster 12 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81 b57 (tuikef'c��triu��hdev.coiti) Job No. 113 048C Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Master Bedrooin Area, Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Ine. observed the partial excavation at the subject site on November 6, 2013 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recorrunendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April 15, 2013, Job No. 113 048A. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our subsoil study report. The cut to the north side of the building area has been retained with a soil nail wall. Only the Master Bedroom Suite area in the extre�ne western portion of the residence had been dug at this time. This area and the area reported as observed below are the wall footings along 20 Line from V to Z, and along Y and Z Lines, as well as the keyway footing are to the south-southeast of these wall lines. Spread footings bearing on the natural coarse granular soils designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf were recoinmended for foundation support in our previous report. At the tiine of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation for the above area had been cut in generally two levels froin about 4 to 4%z feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavations consisted of relatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel with cobbles and boulders. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the reco�rvnended allo�vable bearing pressure of 3,Q00 psf. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils and the subgrade compacted. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and Park�r 3�3-�41-i1 l� • Cc�l,��r�-�do Sprin�s 719-63�i-5562 * Sit�=erthorne 97�-4�i�-l�?h9 Triumph Development November 12, 2013 Page 2 concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Other recominendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recammendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. S incerely, HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEO�T�F��I�NICAL, INC. ��°� ,�p�d �.�� ,,� '��n�!�o� O r�,s1 . �°��0 `�� e°�� , o David A. Young, P.E. � r�" �- ", p �3 '° � , � ��y'; ��-��6 t°�: DAY/Ijg s U ,� .��e�l-�Z-i�p��'o '�o ,��Z�,,a,a�Q��`�,`�`40q �Aa�j`�'4��9A�0 cc: Triumph Development��s�gCoggins (travis�.triumphdev.cain) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tom��beckbuilds.com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield (kevinf(rvbeckbuiIds.com) RMT Architects— Paul Miller(�aul��rmtarchiteets.com) Job No. 113 048C C�c�tGC}'1 � . � �� "-�-�� H� 5020 County Road 154 � Gienwood Springs,CO 81601 Phone:970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-5454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpgeo@hpgeotech.com _ _ _ _ _ __ CONSTRUCTI4N ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Triumph Development Job No.: 113 048C Day: Monday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 3(24/14 72 Vail Road Page: 1 of 2 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project� Noeil Residc�naA, Lot 6, Spraddt� Cr�ek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Raad, Vail, Calorado � . __ _ _ _ . __ _ _ Weather: Partly cloudy, windy, dry Temperature: q.4°F at 12:45 pm _ _ _ . _ __ _. Contractor's Construction Activities: Spiegel Construction had prepped future footing areas at lines P-V, 3' North of 18 line. The contractvr was also perfvrming backfill operations at tha crawlspace under pads for piers. Equipment in Use: trackhoe, mini trackhoe,jumping ja�k, vibratvey double drum walk behind HP Geotech's Site Activities: � We observed the above area to be undisturbed natural granular soil where not adjacnet to previously poured footing. We performed compaction testing under the footing next to previously poured footing as well as at the east end of the footing where the contractor had removed approximately 1' of wet material and replaced with suitable on-site soils. We also performed compaction testing at crawlspace subgrade. _.___ _ _ _ __ __ ___ Verbal Communication: Kevin with Beck Building and Dave Youttg with HP GeoteCh. _ __ _ , _ . _. _ . . .� . ___ ____ __ distribution: Triumph Development-Mike Foster(mikefCt�triumohd�v.cem) Beck Building Company—Tvm SQlawetz(tom(�becKbuildS.GOm) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(kevinf(a�beckbuilds.com) Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By �••�� 5020 County Road 154 �� Gienwood Springs,Colorado 81601 Phone:970-945-7988 �'�rl Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEQTECHNICAL hpqeoPa.hpqeotech.com Earthwork Gompaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Development Job No.: 113 048C Day: Monday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 3/24/14 12 Vail Road Page: 2 of 2 Vail, Cotarado 81657 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Partly cloudy, windy, dry Temperature: 44° at 12:45 pm Earthwork Contractor: Sp{iegei Construction Equipment Used: trackhoe, mini trackhoe,jumping jack, vibratory doubte drum walk behind Description of Earthwork We pertormed compaction testing at subgrade an fill under footings, lines P-V, Tested: 3' N of 18 line and at under pier pads of crawlspace. Verbal Communication: Kevin with Beck Building and Dave Young with HP Geotech were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Densi Test Resu(ts Location Field Dry Field Field Min_ Test Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. Elev. Density Content Comp. Req. Lab No. Structural Fill Below Footings (p�fl o�o �o�o� (%) 1 crawlspace, East pier 2� be�°W 130.1 7.5 100 900 211-13 rade 2 crawlspace,West pier 2� b aew 133.2 6.9 100 100 211-13 3 footing, near V fine Footing �33.9 6.6 100 100 211-13 rade 4 footing, near P line Footing 132.0 8.0 100 100 211-13 rade Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. Dens. % Moist. % 211-13 ASTM D 698 silt clayey sand with ravel 129.0 8.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIqNSOF FILL PLACEMENT,WE HAVE REEIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCIEAR DENSOMETER METH00 OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCOR�ANCE WITH ASTM D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikef�triumphdev.com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tom(a�beckbuilds.com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(kevinf(a�beckbuilds.com j Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By H� 5020 County Road 154 ��;.�,� Gienwood Springs,Coloredo 81601 ;`„rj ( Phone:970-945-7988 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Fax:970-945-8454 h eo h �eotech.com Earthwork Compaction Tesfiing Report Ciient: Triumph Development Job No.: 113 048C Day: Tuesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 3/25/14 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddte Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Ciear, calm, dry Temperature: 44° at 10:30 am Earthwork Contractor: Spiegel Construction Equipment Used: trackhoe, mini trackhoe,jumping jack, vibratory double drum walk behind Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing on structural fill placed below footing pier Tested: pads in crawlspace. Sample{s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spiegel Construction personnel were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Location Field Dr Field Min. Test Depth or y Moisture Field Comp. Proctor No. 9 Elev. ��p��ty Content Com Structural Fill Below Footin Pads o p� Req. Lab No. % (/o) (%� 1 crawlspace,east pier grade 132.2 7.9 100 100 211-13 2 crawlspace,west pier grade 131.9 8.2 100 100 217-13 Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. Dens_ (%) Moist. (%) 211-13 ASTM D 698 sil cla e sand with ravel 129.0 8,g THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPIP110NS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILI PLACEMENT,WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CO�TINUE APPIYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPAC7IVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO fILL DURING THE TUNES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR OENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBS7ANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 693H. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikeffa�triumphdev.com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tom(a'�beckbullds,com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(kevinf a(�.beckbuilds,com) Justin Orgill David A. Youn , P E Field Technician Reviewed By ��H 5d20 County Road 154 l;:+� Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 � Phone:970-945-7988 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Fax:970-945-8454 hpqep(a?hpqeOteCh C0111 Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Development Job No.: 113 b48C Day: Friday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 4/11/14 12 Vail Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Partly cloudy, light wind, dry Temperature: 63° at 1:00 pm Earthwork Contractor: Spiegei Construction Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing on fill placed at pier pad areas within Tested: crawlspace. Based on our test results compaction was judged to be adequate. Verbal Communication: Kevin with Beck Building Company was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. �ift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Moisture/Densit Test Results Test Location Field Dry Field Field Min. Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. Elev. �ensity Content Camp. Below Footing Structural Fill �p�fl Req. Lab No. % �%� (%) � east pier pad, crawlspace Footing 132 � 7 7 rade 100 100 211-13 2 West pier pad,crawlspace Footing 133.2 7,6 rade 100 100 217-93 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. D ry Opt. 211-13 ASTM D 698 Dens. % Moist. °/a THIS REPORr pRESENrS OPwioNS nS n ReSULT OF OUR OBSERVATION50 SFILt P ACEMeN7,WanA�V�'E h gpaVe�CONTiznCrOR TO CONTINU A?P�LY4ING THE REGOMME DED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOiSTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN pUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATfONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikef('�a triumphdov com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tom(u�beckbuilds.com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(kevinf(o�beckbuilds com) Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By j..�� 5020 County Road 154 ��:;� Gtenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 Phone�970-9A5-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpqeo ,hpqeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Development Job No.: 113 048C Day: Monday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 612114 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vaii, Coiorado Weather: Clear, light breeze, dry Temperature: 68° at 11:00 am Earthwork Contractor: Spiege! Construction Equipment Used: trackhoe,jumping jack, vibratory double drum walk behind Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing on wall backfili between lines O-N, 7-12. Tested: Based on our test results compaction was judged to be suitable. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spiegel Construction was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture conditioned at stockpile Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: vibratory double drum walk behind Number of Passes_ Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Location Field Dry Field Field Min. Test Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. yvall Backfill Lines O-N and 7-12 Elev. Density Content Comp. Req. Lab No. ' �pCfl % (%) (%} 1 S end 4' below 124.8 9.6 97 95 211-13 2 N end 2' betow 123.9 9.1 96 95 211-13 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. Dens. % Moist. (%) 211-13 ASTM D 698 silt cla e sand with ravel 129.0 8.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF Fill PLACEMENT,WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECQMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE 70 FIIL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. 7tiE NUC�EAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 693B. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikef(n�triumphdev.com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetr(tom(a1l�eckbuilds.com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield kevinf(a�beckbuilds.com) Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By H� 5020 County Road 154 �� Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81607 �� r � Phone:97Q-945-7988 ��j � Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpQeo:`a'lhpqeotech.corn Earthwork Compaction Testing Repor� Ciient: Triumph Development Job No.: 113 048G Day: Monday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 6/16/14 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road, Vaii, Cotorado Weather: Clear, cafm, dry Temperature: 56° at 9:15 am Earthwork Contractor: Spiegei Construction Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing on backfill at South wall of Auto Court. Tested: Based on our test results compaction was judged to be adequate. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Kevin with Beck was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge MoisturelDensi Test Results Location Field D Field Field Min. Test Depth or ry Moisture Comp. Proctor Elev. Densi No. Auto Court South Wall Backfill �p�� Content C��p� Req. Lab No. o�o ro �o�o� 1 8'W of E end of wall 6'betow 126.4 6.9 98 95 211-13 grade 2 10'E of W end of wall 9'below 128 7 6.6 100 95 211-13 grade Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt_ Dens. (% Moist_ % 211-13 ASTM D 698 silt cla e sand with ravel 129.0 8.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FIIL PLACEMENT,WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING 7HE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6538. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikefar triumphdev.comj Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tomCa'�beckbuilds.com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(kevinf(a�beckbuilds.com) Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E Field Techrnaan Reviewed By H� ,� �� 5020 County Road 154 t��i��'1 Glenwaod Springs,Coloredo 81601 ��V1 � Phone:970-945-7988 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Fax:970-945-8454 hpqeo�a7hpqeo_ te�h�pm Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Development Job No.: Attn: Mike Foster 113 048C Day: Tuesday 12 Vail Road Date: 6/17114 Vail, Colorado 81657 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Partly cloudy, light wind, dry Temperature: 70° at 1:15 pm Earthwork Contractor: Spiegel Construction Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork We pertormed compaction testing on backfill placed at South wali of Auto Tested: Court. Based on our test resuits compaction was judged to be adequate. Sampie(s) Obtained_ Verbal Communication: Kevin with Beck was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Moisture/Densi Test Results Test Location Field Depth or F�eld Dry Field Min. NO• Density Moisture Com Comp. Proctor Auto Court, South Wa11 Backfill Elev. Content p� �p�fl % (%) Ro p• Lab No. � 4'W of E end of wall 3'below �O rade 128•6 10.1 100 95 211-13 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry O t. P 211-13 ASTM D 698 silt cla e sand with ravel Dens. (% Moist. %) THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FiLL Pt,qCEMENT,WE HAVE RELIEO ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONi1NUE AppLy�NG THE REGOMME DED cOMPaCTIVE EFFOR7 qND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER I5 NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. �29.0 THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITN pSTM D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikeffa�tri��.�,�h Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tomC�beckbu ds om) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifiefd (kevinf(a�beckbuilds com� Justin Orgi11 David A Young, P E Field Techrnc�an Reviewed By i H�1 502Q County Road 154 T�;::� Glenwood Springs,Cotorado 81601 �► Phone:970-945-7988 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Fax:970-945-$454 Earthwork Compaction Testing Repo�4eotechcom Clien : riumph Development Job No.: 113 048C Day: Tuesday Attn: Mike Foster 12 Vail Road Date: 6/18/14 Vaii, Colorado 81657 Page: 1 of 1 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Partly cioudy, light wind, dry Temperature: 58° at 10:30 am Earthwork Contractor: Spiegel Construction Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing on backfill placed at South wall of Auto Tested: Court. Based on our test results compaction was judged to be adequate. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spieget Construction was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock SiZe: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s� Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Moisture/Densi Test Results Location Field Test De th or Field Dry Field Min. No. Elev. Density Moisture Comp. Comp. Procfor Auto Court, South Wall Backfitl �p�fl Content �o�a� Req. Lab No. '� 5'E of W end of wall 2' below % % rade 131.8 8.9 100 95 211-13 2 1 p'W of E end of wall 1' below rade '31'2 7•4 100 95 211-13 Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. 211-13 ASTM D 698 silty cla e sand with ravel Dens. %) Moist. (%) THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVaTiONSOF FfLL PLqCEMENT,WE HAVE RELIEO ON THE CONTRACTOR TO COYTNUE APP�LY0ING THE RECOM M NDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING TNE TIMES WHEN OUR 085ERVER IS NqT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD QF TESTfNG WAS USED IN SUBSTANT�q�qCCORDANCE WITH pSTM D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikefla�triumqhdev com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tom(a�beckbuilds com) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield(kevinftu�6eckbuilds com) Justin Qrgill David A. Youn , P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By t- � � i�� s�� _ , �,:. . �: � -�;r��„ t:,::. ..� �_.! � � 3.� � � �� . - - � t7i 2 F z'�. �1 I� i i ..,. ..c Eq. �t � " 3�€ �,. )�:F;�� , !-f�.t'v�'�1 F�3�-;_rs��1!_.��,: i�g�C3 f i:€.:,�I P�1 f C::��. ,> F#r'-. �. ._.:E F S .�� . ..�..,5_....., : April 17,201� Tr�umph Develogment Attn:Mike Foster 12 Vail Raad Vai1, Colorada S 1657 i7,ik�i;fi'st��iui�_...�i�ii�- ccz��7) Job No. I I3 048C Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Southern and Easterz�Portian of Main House and Northern Portion of Garage, Propased Noell Re�sidence, Lat 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorada Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical observeci the partial excavatian at the subject site on Aprit 11 and I5, ?014 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report, We previously conducted a subsoil study .for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April 15, 2013, Job No. I 13 048A. We have observed the faotil3g area excavations for other portions of the residence and garage and reported our findings under the above job number. The praposed construction is similar ta ti�at discussed in our subsail study report. The locations for the residence we observed were for the south and east walls along Line 12 between N.S and H, and along H line between 12 and 20, as well as the interior crawlspace footing pads In this area. The locations for the garage we observed were the ziorth wall aIong Line 4 from E to about B.5 Lines. Spread footings bearing on the natural coarse grariutar soils designed for an alrowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf were recommended for foundation support in our previous re�ort. On April 1 i, we observed the above residence excavation areas for the continuous walls to be cut at two ievels from about 6 to 15 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soiis exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted ofrelatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel with cabbles and boulders. In the crawlspace area, the footing pad areas were at grade on a few feet of compacted structural fill previously tested to i�e about 100% standard Proctor compaction. On April I5, we observed the north garage wal� foundation excavation to be cut at one level abaut 5 feet below the adjacent�•ound surface with relatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel wzth cobbles and boulders exposed in the bottom. 1'tiTo free water was encountered in tlie eYCavations and the�oi]s were generally to moist. 1'<3I"�t'I' .3��.>-F=�i-lii�} s �..ti�;tt'tti�t.i ,`s��lillf?S (�'.�-�)�} `77i7'; � ;�i��'€I�[ilf.�3'[lt�• t71�"� ~�t•;�a�t}`7�� ... .� _ Triumph Development • April 17, 2p14 Page 2 The soii conditions exposed in th�excavation are consistent with those previausIy encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footin�s desi�ned for the recommended allowable bearing pressure af 3,000 psf. The st�uctural �lI shc�ulci be adequate to support the foating pads in the craw(space area. Laose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas aud the subgrade compacted as needed. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and eanerete should not be placed on frozen soits. 4ther recommendations presented irt our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observati�n of the soils exposed within the fourtdation excavatiomand the�revious Iimited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions betow the excavation cfluld inc.�rease the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised�f any variations encotuitered in the excavation conditians for possible changes to reLamm�ndations containecl in this letter. if you have any questions Qr need fur#her assistance,please call aur office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEO� NICAL, INC. ,�--~� �tt� R.�E G" .. � David A. Young, P.E. �-a � r�s 2-2�� DAY/ksw +f�* `f�?"f *: ,,��j��`�,,.. r��irr��o�� Tri�mph Development—Travis Coggin L•��;55�L;�j�j��?�� Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz L��;;��;�t7��Cs�cvsn Beck Building Compa�ly—Kevin Fifield �;�yi��lt�� ,�jt�� Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield ��ri� RMT Architects—Paul l�tillei• r-; �'� �'��'��s,c� ��t�1��r_rt��tarclxitects.e�m) iVlonz'oe&Newell -Craig Canoll {�;��t-��,��ilrc��_ne�,e1�_cc�� Job No. I I3 Q48C ----._ C'�'CeCF� � _ '_ � �_�..��7�7 f;(.i�i�3 3 . ,. t 1:'..,f �a...__�.i ..t_. ' f e € . � ��f` r. ! +. .. ...r . ^;:�E �}{°('��q—fi �w�y r . � � iteY)l � + �;5 3. . � t7Gf`4"§f0..�3T�f�°�;^SYR�'rL..�(; 5.3��.T�L�G i�lit.('..!'4L � ,.":tl �_' � . ...':![ �€;, � _ ..�..�E—-.:_, June 19,2014 Triumph Development Attn:Mike Foster l2 Vait R�acl Vail, Colarado 8I657 (rilz,��Ce�t�-iurnphd��.c��t�) Job No. 113 048C Subject: Observati�n of Partial Excavations,Auto Court and Garage,Praposed Noe11 Residence, Lot fi, Spraddle Creek, I400 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Calorado Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical observed the excavations at the subject site on May 5 uld June 2,2014 to evaivate the soiIs exposed for faundation support. The findings of our observations and recammendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study far design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April I5, 2Q13, Job No. l 13 048A. We have observed tl�e footing area excavations far other portions of the residence and garage and reported our firiciings under the above job nurnber. The proposed constructiou is siuiilar to that discussed in our subsoil study report. The locations for the garage and auto caurt areas we observed were along Grid 7 to 1 Q on Lines F to Grid 18.5 on Line F, and Grid 1 to 4 on A.5 Line and about D.8 Grid on 1 ta 4 Lines. Spread footings bearing on the nah�ral coarse granular soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf were recoxnrnended for foundation support in our previous subsoil study repart. On May S, we observed the western portian of the abo��e noted excavation area. Qn June 2, we observed the eastern portion of the above noted excavation.area. The excavations were cut at multiple levels from about 6 to IO feet below the adjacent grouric� surfaee. The soils exposed in the bottom af the excavations consisted of retatively dense, clayey �ilty sand and gravel with cobbles anti bflulders. The footing suba ade arsas hati been compacted. �1a free water was eneountered in the excavations and the soils were generally moist. The soil eonditions exposed in the excava�ion are consistent��ith those previously encountered an the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allawable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Loose and disturbed soils shouid ��>t3��tif'I` ?�s��-��<-f.� �� . �l�'i;l't�flt�;,`n i'1i3�> j�`)_��3 J-?si��'�"� � ;?IPL C'1•1'�'T[i?"S1t: '��'t ° � s t; ,f,;��(;J.� . . � Triumph I}evelapment June 19, 2014 Page 2 be removed in the faofiing areas and the subgrade re-comgacted as needed. Other reeornmendations presented in our previous report which are�pplicable should also be observed. The recammendati�ns su�mitt�d in this letter are based on aur observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavations and the previous limited subsurface exploratian at the site. V�ridtions in the sub�urface conditians below the excavation cauld increase the risk of foundation movement. Vt7e shouid be advised af any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance,please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTE�HNICAL,ING. r`er�aa �a�r f � � ,�r��i ♦�+ .Q ,�� , „i� C}�. :� +� �'� ^Sl r � � d" • ie David A. Young, P.E. � -�,�� q DAY/ksw '�� '��-� ��"`� >j!� Nl�.��i� ��aaa��ts�� cc: Beck Building Company—Tom Salawetz(tc,n��c beckbuild�c�m} Beck Building Campany—Kevin Fifield k�t=ii�f;cr�beLk�uild�cc�m,� Monroe&Newell -Craig Carroll L��YZ•�(I�t;:illc,��rt,e-z�z,�..�i�,c�� Job No. 1 t3 Q48C t�� l� U�� i ��, � � - � I3 --� � ? 4�� ,Fis.? ,�. :; : • _,, [ � •.,:; :, '�`� i i .'E<:%t i�....._, . . . ..r��. s .:��.`.F r 7 t,. 3 3`.;[�.�t� ., ;: . . �..`:" �i liy�.. �Z S';f; �-#�'�'��'�^Ts—t—�'.�;':d�.��z< �;�C��'F�` � r~:�• �, � �:J€.,�s1L ...,.';;i''.`:?s_,�i:2^=<3. _ .;,3 .. ......�t.i:.�.11 January 30, 2pI� Tiittmph Deveiapment Attn: Mike Foster 12 Vait Raad Vail, Colorado 81657 lili��(lG?tI`i C23I3�.)�lCj�t'.C:C?Ill� Job Na. 113 048C Subject: abservat�on of Parrial Excavation,Propased Pool.Ared,Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1400 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Ct�lorado Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-I'awlak Geotechnical observed the pa�rti� excavation at the subject site on Januar � foundation su Y--7, 2014 to evaluafe the soiIs exposed foi• pport. The findings of our observations and recon�nendations far the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our fndings in a report dated April 1�, 2013, 7ob No, l 13 048A, We observed the footing area excavations for the Master Bedroorn area and I�,�orth Garage area at the residence and presented our observations in Ietters dated November 12, 2013 and January g� Zplq ��er our Job N. 113 Q4gC. TIZe proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our subsoit study report. The pool will be alang the soutIi side of the residence and at ttie main IeveI adjacent crawlspace area of thc residence, approximately between Grid Lines T—O and 7— 13. The pool wilI be supported on relativel y tall fa u n da tion wa l ls and connecting��rad� bea�ns. Spread footings bearing on tl2e naturai coarse gcannla�-soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf were recommended for foundation support in our previous report. At the time of our site visit, the foundation excavation for the above area l�ad beet�cut iii generally three levels from about 10 to 20 feet belo�v t12e adjacent ground surface_ The soils exposed in the bottorn of the excavation consisted ofrelatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravei with cobbles and boulders. We understand t}le south waI1 line and an area of the northern portion of#he excavation had been overdug about 1 to 2 feet due to unsuitable soils. No free water was encountered ii� the excavation and the,aijs were s1igI�tly rnoist to moist. The soil c�nditior�s exposed in the excavation are consistent with those prez�i�usly encountered on fhe site and suitable far suppol-�flf Spxea� footings desi��ed for[I1e recom�iended allowable bearing pressure of 3,ppp ps f: LQU$e atid clist�u-bed soils shouId be remo��ed in the footing areas to expose the u��dl$�rb��.a� cc�ar�e��ul�.sail s ��:ltt;�t' 3��?�-i�s��-f� �;} � � �Ei�t11�<1f�t1 °�7t j�7�,� r 1 C� (),��i�.-j�fj? s �±1ii'�7','�'ft;F�it� ��(�--�(}''�-�ti}_�ti . , i Triuniph Deveiopment January 30, 2014 Page 2 and the subgrade compactec�. 'TFte beat.ing soils should be�rotected from frost an cancrete should not be ptaced an frazen soiis. Ofher recommendations presented ir�o � previous report which are applicable should a.lso be abserved. uz �lang the narth wall line�f t�1E exeavation, at a rtaximate ^ �baut an 8 feet diameter boulder was encountered that was very hard and extr P�' urid Lines Q to R and 13, diffic�alk to remove, and is desired to be left in piace. The boulder wiil exteil emely up into the bottoyll of the f�undation wa13. It should be feasible to leave tt�e boulder ' place and construct the«aI1 Qyer the boulder provided tEle wall d about 3 feet into the baulder as reco Ijl mmended by the structural engineer and th�bouldernsu�a e�S�led relatively flat where in contact with the bottam of the wa11. The recom.mendatians submitteci in this letter are based on our observ�tzon of the e'�pos�cf within the founc�ation excavation and�he previous limitec�sub- Sails at the site. Variations in the subsurface condit�ons belo�l the excavatlon coujd increa the risk of foundation movement. We Sn��Id be aduised of s�rface exploration the excavation conditions for possible cI�anges to recomnlendations contained in � �� any variations encountered in letter. th�s If you have any questions or need fiu-ther assistance,please call aur office. SincereIy, HEPW�RTH—p A+;��'�tr�CA L, INC. `� ' �°�'o .. � :�� ; : g4 �s David A. Young, P.E�'�: 3�•��Q ? : syr',��.�"i�� DAYi�sw �, �_��e sj�d,,l�� `��`o� �� Triumph Development—Travis Co Beck Building Com an �— �m ti�c i,trz tz�;a�t�E�� ,��,,�� P 5 Tom Sotawetz fc�r�z��h�-.��€��s.�,€��F�) Beck Builcli�ig Company—Ke�rin Fi�eld� RMT Arcllitects—Faul Mi11er(��!�{;.T-��a��t:�'c?�}��.�£��J IVIo�u-ae&Newell- Craig Carroll cL�rz•c�I1 ti`��aca��-��s�,��_�_��} �, � ----.--_-________ ., . 1ob No. t 13�4�c -- ---------__ �t�ch � � � _ 0 �7� 'West Slope Testing& Inspection LLC . Report#1 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Page 1 of 1 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Ins ection Re ort Date: 6-13-14 Client: HP Geotech(Job#HP 113 048C) Project: Noell Residence Address: I OQQ Spraddle Creek Rd. Vail, CO Building Permit No: B 13-0377 General Contractor: Beck Building Company Contractor that Performed Work: Christensen Welding Ins ection of sho fabrication or field work at 'ob site: Field Report: Received& reviewed copies of the welders qualifications,welding procedure specifications, and welder continuity log. Visually inspected field welding at steel beam to embed connections main floor Ievel framing. The field welding inspected above appeared to be in substantial c�nformance with the contract documents, and the quality requirements of the AWS D 1.i Stsuctural We�ding Code except as nated below. 1) Welds d'zd not appeared to be 5/16" in size, as per the typ, details at the bottomlaverhead side of the steel beaxn angle clip to embed connections. Additionai weld metal would need to be deposited to increase weld size to 5/16" or structural engineers appxoval for weld size as is. Also welds at top sides of angle clips were not visibie & conixactor was going to cut back part of sub flooring, so that they could be inspected. 2)Appeared to be some undercut ta fx at vertical weld connecting 1/4"plate to embed on the East side of revised steel beam connection SSK2 grid V/24.5. Above weids wi11 need to be reinspected aIong with remainder of the field welding& bolting on the project at a later date. Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young g s E You w! o�o� . �1 P. 7l l2 i West Slope Testing&Inspection LLC Report#2 3177 Glendam Dr. Crrand Junction, CO 81504 Page 1 of 1 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Inspection Report Date: 7-8-14 Client: HP Geotech(Job#HP 113 048C) Project: Noell Residence Address: 1400 Spraddle Creek Rd. Vail, CO Building Permit No: B 13-0377 General Contractor: Beck Building Company Contractor that Performed Work: Christensen Welding Ins ection of sho fabrica4ion or field work at 'ob site: Field Report: Reinspected field welding at steel beam to embed connections ma�in floor Ievel framing, as noted in report#1. Visuaily inspected field welding at tube steel connections main floor level Rotunda framing. Inspected A325 high strength bolting at steel beam& column connections main floor level framing thru roof level framing except for two connections at steel beam that was not yet installed roof level framing grids M/18.6 &P/18.b. The field welding&A325 high strength bolting inspecfiecUreinspected above appeared to be in substantial conformance with the contract documents, and the quality requirements of the AWS D 1.1 Structural Welding Code&the AISC/RCSC Specification for A325/A490 boiting. Ins ector/Technician: Dou las E Youn ' ugias .Yau P g $ I Ce 'fic� ' n#51 tr ctu Wel i�ng Specia ector 5tructur�l Steel&13oltin peciaf lnspector Spray-ap{�l'sed Fireproofing Special lnspector ��3 �� 7 � y� ;; 'r:.;,i '1J � . M�I � I a � � � � � Monroe&Newell � Engincers.Ini. �„d S[ructural F..ngineers O va�i•[x�.�•t�„�� y /� Denver Office �"'� 1400 Glenarm Place,Suite ]01,Denver,CO 80202 (303)623-4927 Phone(303)623-6602 Fax de nver@mon roe-newell.com DnTE: July 24t'',2014 JOB NUMBER: 9156.00 PROJECT: Noell Residence LOCATION:Vail, CO To: Triumph Custom Homes ATTN: Mike Foster REPORT BY: Craig Carroll&Jacob Fehler THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE VISIT WAS: The purpose of this site visit was to observe framing on the roof and main floor. THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: 1. Continuous columns at the main stairway need to have bracing to wood floor members as discussed. 2. All Versa-Lam valleys and ladder framing girders need to be packed out at top plate to allow for full bearing. 3. The valleys over the exercise room require(2)'/4"thru-bolts on each side at transfer beam.Currently only(1)bolt on each side is installed. 4. Where valleys terminate at steel beams over the kitchen area,this requires(2)'/4" thru-bolts to the beam(match the current east side connection). 5. At the Rotunda floor framing,connect 8x8's to double VL by lagging through VL with(2)5/8"diameter x 8"long lags at each 8x8. 6. At the Rotunda floor framing on the north side,the installed Simpson HHUS5.50/10 hanger is acceptable. 7. Maximum 5"round holes may be drilled into W14 steel beams at the crawlspace south of rotunda.Keep homes in middle 1/3 of beam and as close to middle l/3 of flange as possible.Keep holes a minimum 3'-0"from edge of pizza oven above. Reduce hole size where applicable.Contact EOR if criteria cannot be met. NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS NOTED Jacob Fehler, E.I.T. Project Engineer - � � � �a[orado A Gomponent ot The Amerlcan Instituta oi Arch�tects Platinum Sponsor 16 Consec�tiveYears � �, - ,. ��ii.3-�3`7� 502fl County Roatl 154 ``.ri\.r►�,.��i.ry\.►1 1 Glenwood Springs.Calorado 81801 Rhone:970-945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNiCRI. hoaeofa'?hAqeotech.com Earthwork Compactiort Testing Repart Client: Triumph Developmer�t Job No.: 113 048C Day: Friday Attn: Mike Foster Da#e: 1117I14 92 Vaii Road Page: 1 of 9 Vaii, Colorado 81657 Project: Noel! Residence, Lat&, Spraddie Creek, 1 Q00 Spraddle Creek Road,Vail, Colorado Weather: Partly claudy, ligh#wind, dry Temperature: 30°at 10:00 am Earthwork Contractor. Speigei Consicruction Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing an the exterior foundation walt backfiii along Tested: the narth wai{. Based on our test results, compaction was judged to be adequate. Sample(s} Obtained: Verbal Cammunication: Kevin with Beck Building Company&Spiegel Const�uction were informed of our test res�lts. Rlaeement and Compactian Procedure: Reported by�he Contractor. Lift Thickness: 12" Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactar{s) Used: waik-behind Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e MoisturelDensi Test Results Location Field Min. Field Dry Field Test Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. North Foundation Wall Elev. Density Content CO��' Req. Lab No. Exterior Backfill t�� o/Q �l0� �%� 1 West end 2fl'below .��4 g 8,4 97 95 219-13 sub rade 2 30'east of west end �2'below 123.6 7.3 96 95 211-13 sub rade Proctor Sam ie Reference: Lab No. Method Descriptian Max. Dry Opt. _ Dens. % Moist. % 211-13 ASTM D 698 Silt Cta e Sand with Gravel 129.0 $,6 THfS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS RS A RESUL7 OF OUR 08SERVATIONSQF FILL PLACEMENT,W[hWVE REUED ON THE CONTRRCTOR TO CONTfNUE APPLYING TF?E RECO�RPAENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT ANU MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIlfES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR pENSQtAETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTlAI ACCQRDANCE WITH ASTM�7 6�38. �ISt(I�JUtfO€l: Triumph Devetopment—Mike Foster{r�ikefta�triumphdev.com} Triumph Development—Travis Coggins(travis(a2triumahdev.com} 8eck Building Company—7om Solawetz(tom�a beckbuilds.cam) RMT Architects—Pau#Millsr{paui a�rmtarchitects.aom} /h9 Justin Orgiil David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By � 5020 Caunty Road 154 `/^►��.�y�� Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 r�' � Phone:97p-945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWORTt-t-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpgepCa?hoaeotech.com Earthwt�rk Compactian Testing Report Gient: Triumph �ev�Iapment Jab Na.: 113 04$C Day: Monday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1120/14 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vaii, Coiorado 81657 Project: Noelt Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Greek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road,Vait, Colorado Weather. Partly cloudy, caim, dry Temperature: 28° at 10:30 am Earthwork Contractor. Spiegei Construction Equiprnent Used: Trackhoe, Jumping Jack,Vibratary double drum walk-behind Description of Earthwork We performed campaction testing on the continuing north exterior foundation Tested: wali backfill. Based on our#est resu(ts compaction was judged to be suitabie. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Cammunication: Spiegel Construction & Kevin with Beck Building Company avere informed of our results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Lift Thickness: 12" Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Cornpactor(s} Used: Jumping jack walk-behind Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Mr�isture/Densi Test Results Location Field D �� Field Min. Test Depth or Densit� Moisture Com Comp. Proctor No. North Foundat'ron Walt E(ev. y Content o p' Req. Lab No. Eacterior Backfili �� % ��O� olo� 1 LineZ 6'below �31.8 S.3 100 95 211-13 sub rade 2 Line W �$'below ��3.5 7.2 96 95 219-93 sub rade 3 Line R.5 1S'below 127 8 �,� 99 95 211-13 subgrade Practor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt_ Dens. % Moist. %) 211-13 ASTM D 698 Silty Cla e Sand with Gravei �I29.p g,g TNIS REPDRT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OP OUR OBSERVATIQNSOF Fllt PLACEMENT;WE HAVE REIIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TQ GONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPAC7IVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO PII.I DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR QBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCIERR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USEO IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0 6438. Distribution: Triumph Devefopment—Mike Foster(mikeP(a�triumphdev.corr►) Triumph Deve(opment—Travis Coggins(travisCaafriumphdev.com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetr(tom(a�beckbuilds.com) RMT Architects—Paul Miiler(paul(a�rmtarchitects.com} !!jg Justin tJrgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By H 5U20 County Road 154 �I'�'�V�r��r�..r►1 1 Gienwood Springs,Colorado 81501 Phone:97Q-945-T98& HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Fax:570-945-8454 hoqeofiD hoqeotech.cam Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Clien#: Triumph Develapment Job No.: 113 048C Day; Tuesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1l21/14 12 Yaii Road Page: 1 ofi 1 Vail, Calorado 81657 Project: Noe11 Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1040 Spraddle Creek Raad,Vail, Colorada Weather: Ctea�r,calm,dry Temperature: 30° at 10:30 am Earthwark Contractor: Spiegal Construction Equipment Used: Link Belt Excavator-2 Wacker walk behinds-Jumping jack tamper Description af Earthwork Compaction tests were performed an exteriar faundation wall backfil! bet�rveen Tes#ed: Grid Lines V to Z of the north wall Main House. The test resul#s indicated satisfactory compaction and adequate moisture. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Kevin wi#h Beck Builders was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geatech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditianing: Compactor(s} Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Maisture/Densi Test Resul#s Test Lacatian Field Dry Field Field Min. �epth or Moisture Comp. Proctor Na. North Foundation Wati Elev. Density Content Comp. R�q. Lab No. Exterior Backfili �p� % �°��) o�� 1 Grid line V North Walf $�b�1°w 122.4 7.3 95 95 211-13 rade 2 Grid line Q.5 North Wall $�betow 127� �g 99 95 211-13 rade 3 Grid line Y.5 North Wall ��elow �23.1 9.9 95 95 211-13 rade Proctor Sam !e Reference: Lab No. Method Descrip#ion Max. Dry Opt. Dens. (%) Maist. % 2'E1-13 ASTM D 698 SiI C!a e Sand with Gravef 929.0 8.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS 4PINIONS AS A RESUET OF QUR OBSERYATIONSOP flLl PIACEMENT,WE HAVE REIiED ON THE CONTRACTQR TO CONTINUE APPtY1NG THE RECOMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MO�STURE T6 F{LL DURING THE TI.NES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT pBSERVING OPER4TIONS. THE Nt3CLEAR QENSOtvtETER ME7HOD OF TESTlNG VJAS USED tN SiJBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTPd D&938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikef(aZtriumphdev.com} Triumph Development—Travis Coggins(travisfa?triumphdev.COt�'1} Beck Buiiding Company—Tam Solawetz(tomCaZbeckbuilds.cam) RMT Architects—Paut Miller(pauiCa?rmtarchitects.com) Chris Newberry David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By 5020 County Road 154 �� Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81501 !��`��y� Phone:970-9A5-7988 Fa7c;970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpgeo .hpqeoiech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Devetapment Job No.: 113 O�t8C Day: Wednesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1l22/14 12 Vail Road Page: 9 of 1 Vail, Catorada 81657 Project: Noeit Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1QU0 Spraddle Creetc Road,V�ail, Colarado Weather: Ciear, tight wincE, dry 7emperature: 22° at 9:30 arn Earthwork Contractor: Speigel Construction Equipment Used: Trackhae, Vibratory double drum walk-behind, Jumping jack Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing as backfil! cantinued for the exterior north Tested: wa11 backfili in#he morning and afternoon. Based on our test results, compaction was judged to be ade�uate. Sample(s) �btained: Verbal Cammunication: Kevin with Beck Bailding Company&Spiegel Construction were informed ofi aur test results, Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HF Geotech. Lift Thickn�ss: 12" Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor{s) Used: walk-behind, Jumping jack Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e MoisturelDensi Test Results Location Field Dry F�e�� Field Min. Test Depth or Densi Moisture �om Camp. Practor No. Exterior North Foundation Wail Elev. � Content o p' Req. Lab No. Backflli {p� % �%) (%) 1 Line Z 3'befiow 129.0 9.2 140 95 211-13 subgrade 2 Line V.5 3' helow 130.3 6.S 100 95 211-13 sub rade 3 ��e� 1'below �29 g 7.3 100 95 211-13 sub rade 4 Line X ��6e1�w 129.6 7.0 95 211-13 sub rade Practor Sam le Reference: Lab Na. Methorl Descrip#ion Max. Dry Opt. Dens. % Moist. % 21'i-13 ASTM D 698 Sitt Cla e Sand with Gravel 12g.p g,g THIS REAORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR 085EftVAT10N50F FILL PIACEMENT,WE HAVE REUED ON THE CONTRr1CTQR TO CONTMUE APPLYING THE RECOfiflMENDEO COfApACT1VE EFfORTAND MOISTURE TO FIiL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER�5 NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOO OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANGE WITH qSTM D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development-Mike Foster{�ikef(c�triumnhdev.cam) 'friumph Qevelopment-Travis Coggins(travisCa�triumQhdev.com) Beck Bui(ding Company-Tom Solawetr(tom(a7taeckbuilds.com) RMT Architects-Raul Miller{paul�rm#architects.com) lfjg Justin targil! David A. Young, P.E. Fiefd Technician Reviewed By 5020 County Road'154 `�r „ ��,:+y�/_ Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 V�rs �r►'i l Phone:970-945-T988 Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAW11�K GEOTECHNICAI hpgeo(82hpqeotech.com Earthwork Compacfiion Testing R�port Ciient: Triumph Deveiopment Job No.: 113 048C Day: Thursday Attn: Mike Faster Date: 1l23/14 12 Vaii Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Noeli Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 10�0 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: ZO° at 9:00 am Earthwork Contractor: Spieget Construction Equipment Used: Trackhoe �Jumping Jack Description of Earthwork As scheduled, we visited the site and performed compaction testing on the Tested: exterior north foundation wall backf�ll of the Main Residence. No tests were performed during our morning visit since no additiona! back€il{ had been placed since 01-22-14. We were abie to take a test du�ing our afternoon visi�. Test resuits met minumum compaction requirements, SampVe(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spiegel Canstruction was informed of our test resuits. Pfacement and Compaction Procedurs: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuc{ear Gau e Moisture/Densi Test Resul�,s Location Field Dry �ie1d Fi�� Min. Test Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. Exterior Narth wafl Elev. Densiry Content C°m�" Req. Lab No. (P��? fl�o (/o) (6/0} 9 Line P.5 �$�b��W 125.6 8,9 97 95 211-13 sub rade Proctar Sam ie Reference: � Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. Dens. °lo Moist. °lo 211-13 ASTM D 698 Sil Cla e Sand with Gravel 129,0 g,6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESl1LT QF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF fILL PLACEMENT.WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CON7RACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYtNG 7HE RECOpnt�fENneo COMPACTfVE EFFDRT AND MQ(STURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES YVHEN OUR OBSEftVER kS NOT OBSERVING OPER.4TIONS. THE NUCLEAR OENSQME7ER PdETt10D OF TESTING WAS USE�IN SUBSTANTIRL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6�38. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikef(�z?triumohdev.com) Triumph Development—Travis Coggins(travis(cil�triumahdev.com) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tam(a2beckbuilds.com} RMT Architects—Paul Miller{p�� rchitects.com) /119 Justin Orgili David A. Yaung, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed Sy H 5020 County Road 154 ��,� �i_ Glenwood Springs,Cotorado 816�1 �[" 'r"7 Phone:970-945-7988 �+ "��"�< < Fax:97Q-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpqeo v�.hpvaotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Develapment Job No.: 113 048G Day: Friday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1124f'14 92 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Project: Noeil Residence, Lat 6,Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road,Vail, Cotorado Weather. Clear, caim, dry Temperature: 15°at 9:Q0 am Earthwo�k Gontractor: Spiege! Construction Equipment Used: Mini Trackhoe,Trackhoe, Jumping Jack,Vibratory double drum walk-behind Descripti4n of Earthwork We per#ormed compaction testing o#the continuing exterior norkh faunda#ion Tested: wai! backfilL Based on our test resul#s, compaction was judged ta be adequate. Sampie(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spieget Construction was informer! of our test resutts. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not a6served by HP Geptech. Lift Thickness: 12" Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s} Used: Jumping Jack, Walk-t�ehind Number of Passes: Nuctear Gau e MoisturelDensit Test Results Location Field Dry �1e�� Fieid Min. Test Depth or Densif Moisture Com G°mp. Practor No. Exterior North Foundation Wali Elev. �pC�Y Content �o�p}�' Req. Lab No. Ba�kfill % % 1 Line Q.5 ��beiow �ZZ 5 8.3 95 95 211-13 sub rade 2 Line P.5 6' below 123.2 7.9 96 95 211-13 sub rade 3 Line Y subgrade 129.3 8.6 100 95 291-13 4 Line P.5 4' beiow �22.7 8.5 95 95 211-13 sub rade Proctoc Sam le Reference: �.ab No. Method Descriptian � Max. Dry Opt. ' Dens. {°10 Moist. % 211-13 ASTM D 688 Silt Cla e Sand with Gravel 12S.Q g.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVA710NSCF FlLL PLACEMEN7,WE HAVE REIIED QN THE CON3RACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLVING THE RECOanMENDEO COMPACTIVE EFFORT AN�tAOISTURE TQ FlLL DURMG THE TIME51nlHEN OUR OBSERVcR tS NOT OBSERVMG OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OP TESTiNG NiAS USEO IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORQANCE WITH ASTh4 D 6�38. Distributian: Triumph Devetopment—Mike Foster(mikef triumphdev,com) Triumph Deveiopment—Travis Coggins(travistc�triumphdev.cam} Beck Building Company—Tom Sotawetz(tom cnr beckbu€Ids.com) RMT Architects—Pau(Mil(er{p�ul(�rmtarchitects.com} /119 Justin Orc�iil David A. Young, P.E. Field 7echnician Reviewed By H 5020 County Road 154 ��,r►� Glenwood Springs,Colorado&1601 1l Phone:970-945-7988 ■� Fax:97U 945-$454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNiCAL h�.aeofclhoneotach.com Earthwork Compactian Testing Report Client: Triumph Devetopment Job No.: 113 �48C Day: Monday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1/27/14 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 7 Vaii, Colorado 81657 Project: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Creek, 10�}0 Spraddle Creek Road,Vail, Colorado Weathsr: Cloudy, windy, dry Temperature: 3a°at 9:45 atn Ear#hwork Con#ractor: Spiegel Construction Equipment Used: Trackhoe, Vibratory doubie drum waik-behind, 2 Jumping jacks Description of Earthwork We continued AM and PM daiiy uisits to perform compaction testing on the Tested: exterior north foundation wall backfill. Based on aur test resuits compaction was judged ta be adeguate. Sample(s} Qbtained: Verbai Gommunication: Spiegel Construction personel were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech, Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor{s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuciear Gau e MoisturelDensi Test Results Locatian Field Dry Field �ield Min. Test Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. North Foundatian Wal! Elev. �{pc�y Conten# CEQ�o�� Req. Lab No. ExEerior Backfill °10 � (% 1 i.ine R subgrade 129.5 6.7 900 95 211-13 2 Line P.5 2'beiow q�7.9 8.8 99 95 211-13 sub rade 3 Line F 22' below ��9.9 6.8 100 95 291-13 sub rade 4 Line H 14'befow 128.3 8.1 99 95 211-13 sub rade Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method � Description � Max. Dry Opt. Dens. (°!o) Moisf. % 211-93 ASTM D 698 Silt Cla e Sand wifh Gravei 129.0 8.6 TH1S REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A ftESUL7 OF OUR flBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEPdENT,YJE HAVE REl1ED ON THE CONTRACTOR TQ CONTINUE APPCYING THE RECOMhfEN�EO COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTUR[TO Ftll DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERYER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER MeTHOD OP TESTING WqS USED IN SUBSTANTIRL RCCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikeKa?triumQhdev.cam) Triumph Development—Travis Coggins(travisCa�triumphdev.cam) Beck Buiiding Company—Tom Solawetr(tom(c�beckbuilds.com) RMT Architects—Pau!Milier(pau!(a?rm#architects.com) /h9 Justin Orgiil David A.Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By 5020 Caunty Road 154 C HP��:%� Glenwood Springs,ColQrado 81&01 �;�1'�1 Phone:97U-945-7588 Fax:97Q 945-8454 HEPWORTN-PAWLAK 6EOTECHNICAt hpae hpaeoTech.com Earthwork Campaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Devefopment Jab No,: 113 448C Day: Tuesday Attn. Mike Foster Date: 1/28/14 12 Vaii Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colarado 81657 Project: Noefl Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Roatt, Vail, Coiorado Weather: Ciear, catm, snow overnight Temperature: 9° at 9:30 am Earthwork Contractor: Spieget Construction Equipment Used: Babcat MT50 rubber track loader,Yanmar rubber track excavator,Wacke� RT remote doubie drum roiler, 2 -jumping jack tampers Description of Earthwork Exterior wall backfill an north side of building between soil nail wall and Tested: buitding was#ested with acceptable results. Backfiil area had been covered with a loose cover a#soil and blanketed overnight, then uncovered and compacted in the morning. Soii temperature of lift#ested measured 31 degrees and soil visually was observed to be not frozen. Rocks aver about 6"were being hand picked from the backfill. Verbal Communication: Kevin with Beck Building Company artd Spiegel crew were informed of our test re�ults. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: 12"max. loose Max. Rock Size: 6" Moisture none Conditioning: Wacker RT remote double drum rolfer, Compactor(s} Used: 2_�umping jack tampers Number of Passes: 4 min. Nuclear Gau e Moisture/Qensi Test Resufts Location Field Dry Fiefd Field Min. Test Depth or Densi Moisture C�m Comp. Proc#or No. North Exterior Foundation Elev. �p��' Conten# t��o�p� Req. Lab N�. Wat!BackfiU °Io (% 9 4'east of L.ine K, 3" north of wail �1�be!°vu 126.2 7.7 98 95 211-13 rade 2 Line H,7' north of wali 11`k�elow 128$ 8.0 10Q 95 211-13 rade Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. i Derts. % Moist. (% 211-13 ; ASTM D 698 Sil Cla e Sand with Gravel 129.0 8.8 Trt�S REPORT PRESENTS OP�NiONS AS n RESUIT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLAGEMENT,WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENCEQ COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL OURING THE TIME6 WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT G�BSERVING OPERATIDNS. THE NUGLEAR DENSOMETER METHOG OF TESTtNG WAS USED fN SUBSTAN7IAL ACCOR�ANCE WITH kSTrA 0 6939 Distribution: Triumph Development—Allike Faster(mtkefta'7triumphdev.com} Triumph Devetopment—Travis Caggins(lravisantriumphdev,com) Beck Building Compat�y—Tom Solawetz(tomCu?beckbuilds.cotn} RMT Architects—Pau!Miiler(paui{a?rmtarchiteats.com) Thomas J.Westhoff, CET �avid A. Young, P.E, Field Technician Reviewed By 5020 County Road 154 ^�_ _ ��+_ �i_, Glenwood Springs,Golorado$1601 [ ,..■ �( 1 i��r'1 Phone:970-945-7988 \.i V1rr �V� I Fax:970-945-8454 HEPb4QRTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpqeoCa).hpqeoiech.cam Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Developmen# Job No.: 113 048G Day: Tuesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1/28114 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Projec#: Noell Residence, Lat 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Raad,Vail, Colarado Weather: Gfea�,windy, dry Temperature: 34° at 1:00 pm Earthwork Gontractor: Spiege! Construction Equipment Used: Trackhoe, Mini Trackhae, Vibratory double drum walk-behind, Jumping jack Description of Earthwork We made an afternoon visit for further exterior north faundation walt backfill Tested: compaction testing. Based on our test results compaction was judged to be adequate. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spiegel Construction personel were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: ��sture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Jumping jack,walk-behind Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Moisture/Densi Test Resuits Locafion Field Min. Field Qry Field Test Depth or Densit Moisture Com �°mp, Proctor No. North Foundation Wall Elev. y Content o �' Req. Lab No. Exterior Backfili {p�� % ��°� �a�o 1 Line H $�b��°� 124.1 7.4 96 9S 27'I-13 su rade 2 Line E.5 11'below 123.3 6.9 96 95 211-13 sub rade Proctor Sam te Reference: Lab No. Methad Descriptian Max_ Dry Opf. Dens. (°to) Moist. %) 211-13 AS7M D 698 Sil Cla e Sand with Gravel 129.0 8.6 THIS REPOPT PRESEN'S OPMtONS AS A RESUIT OF OUR pBSERVATIONSOF PILL PIACEMENT.WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUB APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED C6MPACTIVE EFFORT AtdD tv101STURE TO FIIL DURING THE TIMES LN7-IEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVWG OPERl+,TIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHO�OF TES7MG WAS USED IN SLiBSTANTIAL ACCOROANCE WITN ASTld D 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(mikefta�trium,�hdev.com} Triumph Deveiopment—Travis Coggins(travis(a7triumphdev,com} Seck Building Campa�►y—Tom Solawetz(tam(c�beckbuilds.comj RMT Architects—Paui Miller(paulf�rmtarchitects.com) /!)� Justin Orgilt David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By �..� 5020 County Road 154 ��,�,,� Glenwood Springs,Cqloratio$1601 r iIl Phone:970-945-7988 Fax:9T0-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GE�TECHNtCAL hpaeofi�hoqeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph Devetopment Job No.: 113 448C Day: Wednesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1/29!'t4 12 Vail Raad Page: 1 of 1 Vait, Colorado 81657 Project: Noet( Residence, Lot 6, Spraddte Creek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road,Vail, Coiarado Weather: Partfy cloudy, windy, dry Temperature: 22° at 9:15 arn Earthwork Contractor: Spiegel Construction Equipment Used: Trackhoe, Mini Trackhoe, Jumping jack,Walk-behind � Descriptian of Earthwork AM compaction testing performed on north foundation wall exterior backfill. Tested: Based on our test results compaction was judged to be suitabie. Samp[e(s)Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spiegei Construction personel v�ras informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: No#observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e MoisturelDensi Test Resul#s Test Location F�� pry Field F�� Min. Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No_ North Foundation Watl Elev. Density Confent CQ��' Req. Lab No. Exterior Back#iil �p�� % �%) (%) 1 Line N 4'beiow �z4.3 6.6 96 95 211-13 sub rade 2 Line Q.75 �6'below 126.4 6.9 98 95 211-13 sub rade Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. Dens. °lo Moist. % 211-13 ASTM D 698 Sil Cla e Sand with Gravei 929.0 8.6 TMS REP4RT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF PILL PLACEMENT,wE FutvE REL�ED ON 7NF C4NTRACTOR T6 CONTINUE APPLYiNG TFIE RECOtr1MENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AN�MOISTURE TO FILL DURiNG TNE 71hfES wtiEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER M£THOD OF TESTING WnS uSED�N SUBSTaNT1Al ACCORDANCE v�nTH aSrM o 693&. Distribution: Triumph Development-Mike Foster(mikef(c�tn,`,'um._phdeY.COn'1) Triumph Development-Travis Coggins{�ravisCa�triumqhdev.camj 8eck Building Company-Tom Solawefz ttamla�beckhuitds.com) RMT Architects—Paul MiHer(paul(a�rmtarchitects.com) /Ijg Justin Orgil! David A. Young, P.E. Field Technic�an Reviewed 8y � 5020 County Road 154 ��!��►� i Glenwood Springs,Colorado St601 Phone:970-945-7988 Fax:97Q-945-8454 HEPWOR7H-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL haqeatc3�hpqeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Triumph �evelopment Job No.: 113 048C Day: Wednesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 1129i'f4 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vai1, Colorado 89657 Project: Noeli Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddie Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Weattter. Cloudy, calm, dry Temperature: 32° at 1:00 pm Earthwork Contractor: Spiegef Construction Equipment Used: Bobcat MT50 rubber track loader, Yanmar rubber track excavator,Wacker RT remote doubte drum roller, 2 -jumping jack tampers Descriptian of Earthwork Exterior foundation wall backfill on north side of building be#ween soil nail wa11 Tested: and building was tested with acceptable results. Soii visvaily was observed to be not frozen. Verbal Communication: Spiegel crew was informed of our test results. Placement and Campactian Procedure: Observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: 92" max, ioose Max. Rock Size: g" Maisture none Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Wacker RT remote double drum roller, Number of Passes: 4 min. 2 -jumping jack tampers Nuclear Gauge MoistureJDensi Test Resuits Location Fie1d Dry F��a Field Min. Test Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. North Exterior Foundation Elev. Density Content Comp. Req. Lab No. Wali Backfili �p�� % ��0� % 1 10'west af Line E, 3'north o#watl $�below 128,� 7.9 99 95 211-13 rade 2 3'west of Line E,70'north of wall d'below �Z4 � 6 7 g6 g5 211-13 rade 3 7'east of Line E, 3'north of wall $��OW 123.8 7.9 96 95 211-13 rade Proctor Sam !e Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. De�ls. (°!o} MOist. °lo 211-13 ASTM D 698 Silt Cla e Sand with Gravel 129.0 8.6 TFBS REPOR7 PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT.WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TQ CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOM67ENDED COMPACTIVE EFFpRT AN�MOISTURE TO FIIL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERR7lON5. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHQD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTL4�ACCORpANCE WfTH ASTM 6 6938. aistribution: Triumph Development—Mike Foster(m�kef(�triumphdev.com} Triumph Developrnent—Travis Coggins ttravisCa3triumphdev.com� Beck Buiiding Company—Tom Solawetr[tomta�beckbuilds.com) RMT Architects—Paul Miller{pautCaarmtarchitects.cam) Thomas J. Wes#hoff, CET David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By � �� 5020 County Road�154 �`/�I�V 4�wr►Vi 1 Gfenwoad Springs�Colorado 816p1 Phone:970-945-79$8 Fax:970-945-8454 HEPWOR7H-PAWLAK GEOTECHNtCAL hAaeoCa�.hoaeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report CGent: Triumph �evelopment Job Na.: 1'�3 048C Day: Tuesday Attn: Mike Faster Date: 2118114 12 Vail Road Page: 1 of 1 Vaii, Colorado 8�i 657 Projeef: Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddl�Creek Road,Vai1, Caiorado Weather: Clear, windy, dry Temperature: 44° at 12:30 pm Earthwark Contrac#or: Spiegel Construction Equipment Used: trackhoe, mini trackhae, vibratory doubie drum waik behind,jumping jack Description of Earthwork We performed compaction testing on north exterior foundation wall backfill. Tested: Based on our test results compaction was judged to be adequate. Sample(s) Obtained: Verbal Communication: Spiegei Construction was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Prflcedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Com actor s Used: vibratary double drum walk behind, P ( ) �ump��g�� Number of Passes: Nuclear Gau e Moisture/Densit Tesfi Results Location Field D Field Field Min. Test Depth or � Moistute Comp. Proctor No. North Foundation Walt Elev. Density Content Comp. Req. Lab No. Exterior Backfill �p�'fl % t�°� (%) 1 L.ine D 41'bsg 124.1 9.$ 96 95 211-13 2 35'west of�ine D 4'bsg 126.6 9.1 98 95 211-93 Proctor Sam !e Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Opt. Dens. % Moist. °!o) 211-13 ASTM D 698 ; Sil# Cla e Sand with Gravel 129.0 " 8.6 THlS REPORT PRESENTS OPtNIONS AS A RESULT OF 0{1R OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT,4VE HAVE REl1E6 ON FHE CONTRACTOR 70 CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOn�MENDED COMPAC71Vt EFFORT AND MOtSTURE TO FILL DURING THE TiMES WHEN Ot1R OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR OENSOMETER METH6D OF TESTMG WAS USEO fN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTRJ O 6938. Distribution: Triumph Development-Mike Foster(mikef(�triumphdev.com) Triumph�evelopment—Travis Coggins(travisCaCa�triums�hdev.comy Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetr{tom(a�beckbuilds.com} RMT Architects—Paul MilleT{pauE(�pr��ChiteCts.com} Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed 8y S02Q County Road 154 ��`�r►V[ i Glenwaad Springs,Golorado 81601 Phone:970-845-7988 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GE07�CHNtCAI Fax:970-945•8454 h eo _hoqeatech.com Earthwork Compaction Testir�g Repor# Client: Triumph Deveiopment Job No.: 113 048C Day: Wednesday Attn: Mike Foster Date: 2J19114 12 Vail Raad Page: 9 of 1 Vail, Caiorado 81657 Project: NaeN Residence, Lat 6, Spraddie Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Cc�lorado iNeather: Cloudy, calm, dry Temperature: 34° at 9:34 am Earthwork Gontractor: Spiegei Construction Equipment Used: trackhoe, mini trackhoe, vibratory double drum walk behind,jumping jack Description of Ear#hwork We performed compaction testing on north founda#ion wail exterior backfili. Tested: Based on our test results compaction was judged to be adequate. Sample{s) Obtained: Verbal Gommunicatian: Spiegel Construction was informed of our test resutts. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Nat observed by HP Geatech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditianing: Com actor s Used: vibra#ory double drum walk behind, p � � Number of Passes: jumpinq iack Nuclear Gau e Ma�sture/Densit Test Results Location Fiefd Min. Test Field Dry Field Depth or Moisture Comp. Proctor No. North Foundation Wall E(ev. Density Cantenf C��' Req. Lab No. Exterior Backfil[ �� % ��D� {%) 1 Line� 4'betow �25,3 9.7 97 95 219-13 sub rade Z Line G 10'below .f2�0 g.3 1Q0 95 211-13 sub rade 3 Line A 6'betow 12�,& 9.0 99 95 211-13 sub rade Proctor Sam le Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry ppt, Dens. {%) Moist. °10) 211-13 ASTM D 698 Silt Cla e Sand with Gravel �2g,p g.g TNIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINI4NS AS A RESUL7 OP OUR OBSEftVAT10NSOF FtLL PLACEMENT,WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CON7RACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECpMMENDED COMPACTNE EFPORT AND MOIS"FtIRE TO FILL DURING THE TItdES WHEN OUR OBSERVcR IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THF NUCLEAR OENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING wAS USEO tN SUBSTANTIfu.accoaDaricE wrcH nsrnn o ssss DiStfl6Uti0f1: Triumph Qevelopment-Mike Foster(mikef(a�triumphdev.com) Triumph Devetopme�t-Travis Gaggins(trevisfa�trium�hdev.com) Beck Buiiding Company-Tam Solawetz(tom(c�beckbuilds.com) RMT Architects-Paul Miller(paul anrmtarchitects com} Justin Orgil! David A. Young, P E Field Techrncian Reviewed By . - i �� s. � �P� ,�-�3 ---c��7 Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers&Scientists November 12, 2013 D � � � � v � Project No. 213-134 F�B � � zo�4 Mr. Shaun Brainard � B&Y Drilling, Inc. P.O. Box 1878 TOWN OF VAIL Rifle, Colorado 81650 Subject: Review of Permanent Ground Nail Wall Testing, Noell Residence, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road in Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Brainard, A representative of Yeh and Associates conducted verification and proof testing for the permanent ground nail wall for the Noell Residence located at 1000 Spraddle Creek Road in Vail, Colorado. The wall was constructed by B&Y Drilling, Inc. We conducted two soil nail verification tests and three soil nail proof test on sacrificial nails. The verification tests were loaded to 2.0 times the design load, and the proof tests were loaded to 1.5 times design load (see attached). Test results indicated the test nails attained the required loads. The tests were conducted in general conformance with FHWA guidelines and the test results are attached. Based on our observations and test data, it appeared the permanent ground nail wall constructed by B&Y Drilling, Inc. was in general conformance with plans provided by Yeh and Associates, Inc., dated August 21, 2013. If you have questions or need additional information, please call us at 970-384-1500. YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Richard D. Johnson, P.E. Project Manager �700 East Evans Avenue, Denver, CO 80222, (303) 781-9590, Fax (303) 781 -9583 1525 Blake Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 , (970) 384-I500, Fax (970) 384-1501 570 Turner Drive, Suite D, Durango, CO 81303, (970) 382-9590, Fax (970) 382-9583 Soil Nail Verification Testing Wall Designation: Noell Residence, 2+30 Main Wall Design Test Load: 16,625 Ib 16625 Job Number: 213-134 Bond Length: 7 feet Testers: KA Free Length: 8 feet Date: September 3,2013 Stress Length: 2.7 feet Load Hold Time Load Pressure Total Movement Residual Elastic (Ibs psi inches inches (inches AL(.10 DTL) until stable 4070 400 0.000 0.25DTL until stable 4156 409 0.003 0.50DTL until stable 8313 745 0.063 0.75DTL until stable 12469 1082 0.164 1.00DTL until stable 16625 1419 0.217 1.25DTL until stable 20781 1755 0.267 1.50DTL 1 min 24938 2092 0.305 (Creep Test) 2 min 0.307 (Hold 10 3 min 0.309 min-minimum) 5 min 0.309 6 min 0.309 10 min 0.309 20 min 30 min 50 min 60 min 1.75DTL until stable 29094 2429 0.344 2.00DTL until stable 33250 2765 0.390 0.206 AL(.10 DTL) until stab�e 4070 400 0.184 Preliminary Acceptance: 0.004 Must be less than 0.04 inches- If necessary hold to 60 min (6 to 60 less than 0.08 inches) Comments: � �� v � � � � � � � o � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � o -------- -------- -------' ----� � � -------- � �- �r- r--° r--------r---------r-----°- - . � i � i � � i p � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � i i i � i i i i i i 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M --------i---------f-- -- -F---------I---------t---------F---------I--------- . � � � � � � o � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � o � � � -----� � � --------�---------1---------�-- ---- -- �---------�--------�--------- M � � � � � � � o � � � � � � � � � � ' � � � m � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �n c � � � � ----� � � --------a---------•---------�--------a-- - •--- ----�--------a--------- N �. r � � � � � � f ° c � � � � � � � d � � � � � � � E � � � � ' � � > � � � � � � ° � ��___y_________*_________t____��y�� f�� y��__ N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 I I I 1 1 1 `� 1 I I 1 1 1 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 � ___"'__�_____"__*__"'____r'___'___�"____.__T______ "r_____.__�_________ i i i i i i i O � i i � � i � � i i i � � � � i i i � � � � i i i � i � i i i i i i � i i i i i � i O •V --------� � -----i � � --------� -------� � � �---------r--- r--------�---------r- r �--------- . y.. � � � � � i � p �L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I�^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v+ 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O ��i��.��.��+�� _��__�� I I 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 I � 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •� 1 1 1 1 1 1 I � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 I i 1 1 1 I � M p + � � � � O N O �S) O t!) O ln O � O � M M N N � �- (isd) puo8 � � Y � � rn rn O> oo I� 1� c0 t0 � rn o 0 O � C Um M M 1� `- � � N N M M O O d � � � � O M M � I� I� � 'ct O �f �C � O O CO t� � CO O � � CO L � = O O O � N N M M M � � N � � � V Q O O O O O O O O O O N � w w � C Y � � •� N W � I� 00 I� �Y lC) O (O tn O N r � O� �ti � a0 d' O � � � ~ � M N (� 0 � 0 � M � Cfl t� � O N p �M O M r � O V M O J � � � � � N N N M � = r � � � � II II u t a U (� Z � � p� �� _I J J J _I J J J II II � d �Of � � II � E-- f- � H I- H F-- F- -p f0 LL � •r+ C � N � J 0 � � 0 � � � � -1 N N m V J N -� � N O Q � O K'> O � O � O Q O Q ,,�r � � d J y p �� J N � 1� O N � I� O J � W Q� •� C � N � J � O O O � � r a- N X C .� > z° a` m° � in = om � m° � Soil Nail Verification Testing Wall Designation: Noell Residence, 1+00 Main Wall Design Test Load: 23,750 Ib 23750 Job Number:213-134 Bond Length: 10 feet Testers: KA Free Length: 10 feet Date:August 29, 2013 Stress Length:2.6 feet Load Hold Time Load Pressure Total Movement Residual Elastic (Ibs) (psi) (inches (inches (inches AL(.10 DT�) until stable 4070 400 0.000 0.25DTL until stable 5938 553 0.052 0.50DTL until stable 11875 1034 0.150 0.75DTL until stable 17813 1515 0.211 1.00DTL until stable 23750 1996 0.249 1.25DTL until stable 29688 2477 0.301 1.50DTL 1 min 35625 2958 0.343 (Creep Test) 2 min 0.346 (Hold 10 3 min 0.350 min-minimum) 5 min 0.350 6 min 0.350 10 min 0.350 20 min 30 min 50 min 60 min 1.75DTL until stable 41563 3439 0.397 2.00DTL until stable 47500 3920 0.435 0.296 AL(.10 DTL) until stable 4070 400 0.139 Preliminary Acceptance: 0.007 Must be less than 0.04 inches-If necessary hold to 60 min (6 to 60 less than 0.08 inches) Comments: 0 � � � � 1 � � � o � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ; � --------;---------�---------�--------;---------;---------;--------;--------- � � � � � � , o � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � p --------�---------*-- ---�--------�--°°-°*--------�-------'�--------- � i i i i i i i O � � � � � � � � � � � � i i � i i � � � � � i i � � � i � i � i � i i i � � � � � � � i i i i l� ---------�---------}---------� -----i---------t---------F--------�i--------- M � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � y --------y---------f-------- � � � � o m �-------- -----F°-°----�-'--"--+--------- M t i i i i i i i O V � i i � � � i = � i i � � � i � i � � i � i � i i i i � i i = 1 I 1 I 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � --'°---�----°-°�-------°�--------�------- �-- -----f""----'{-----°-- N � i i i i i i i O > � i � � � i � � i i i � � � � � i i � i � � i � � � i � � � � � � � O tC � i i � � � i � --------�---------�°-------�°------�-'------'�------ -�- -----�--------- N O i i i i i ' i � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � i � i � i � � i � � � i � i i i � � i i i � i � i i i � � � i lA _��_____7___�_____T_____�__r________.�______��7��___r_� ___l_ �� r 1 1 1 1 1 1 j � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 (a 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I •� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 L __��J�______��1_______��L________J__��_____1________�L____�� J�________ r (,� 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 Q � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � � � � � i i i i i i � i i � � i i � � i i i � � i � """"i--""---*------'�r°------i---"'---*-----'-'�_""--'i' ------ � � i i i i i i i O i i � � i � � '� � i � � � � � � � � � i � � i i � � � � i i � � i � � i i � i i � i i i p i i i i i i i OO + � � � � O � M �M N N � O � O (isd) puo8 -a � � d � � ti � � � L c •N r� rnrn � �nairir� � �` oo U m° N M f� � � � N N M N O O � � � � � O N O � O) e- M f� � � � E O � � � � O � � M M Q N .� O O � N N M M M � � � N � � � U � p O O O O O O O O O O N (� w w � .C .:L � � C N W O O O CO � tn O 00 � � � � N � � � M O 00 � M O � � � ~ r M N �p � y � M f�. � � CO N CO O � � � M Z � r /) � Q � � 00 CO f� CO CO � � 0 ,� � � !� M � tn � f� O C� M O J � � � � N N M 'ct d' � F- � N �* Q ,a � u u u n � a U (A Z '� � p� �� J J J J J _I J J 11 11 � d �� C II -p � H F- I- f- H- F- E- -p � � LL � w"' � C � � fC J � � � � � � � � _l f6 N m � � d J J tA � N J ¢ N � f� O N � I� O a J Q � y '� 'a tn II � . . ca W 0 C � � N J L O O O c- � � � (y X � � � Z d m° �ici� = om � m° � � Soil Nail Proof Testing Wail Designation: Noell Residence, 3+00 Main Wall Design Test Load: 16,625 Ib 16625 Job Number: 213-134 Bond Length: 7 feet Testers: KA Free Length:8 feet Date: September 3,2013 Stress Length:2.7 feet Load Hold Time Load Pressure Total Movement Residuai Elastic Ibs) psi) inches) inches inches AL(.10 DTL) until stable 4070 400 0.000 0.25DTL until stable 4156 409 0.002 0.50DTL until stable 8313 745 0.037 0.75DTL until stable 12469 1082 0.086 1.00DTL until stable 16625 1419 0.140 1.25DTL until stable 20781 1755 0.175 1.50DTL 1 min 24938 2092 0.237 (Creep Test) 2 min 0.237 (Hold 10 3 min 0.240 min-minimum) 5 min 0.246 6 min 0.248 10 min 0.252 20 min 30 min 50 min 60 min AL(.10 DTL) until stable 4070 400 Preliminary Acceptance: 0.015 Must be less than 0.04 inches- If necessary hold to 60 min (6 to 60 less than 0.08 inches) Comments: � N i � � � i i � Q i i � � i i � � � i i � � � i � � i i � i i � i i i i i i i i i i i i i � � � i � � i � � � � � � i � � � � i � i � � � � � � i � � � � � � i � i i � � i i i i i i � � i i � i � � � � i i � � i � i i � � � � � � i i i i � � i i i i i i i --"-----i i i i i i i � �'---'-'--a----'-'--'}-----' "r--""---*--------'�---_"'---►_"'----_ N i � i i � � � p i � � i � � i � � � i � � � t i � � � � � � � � � i i � i i i i i i i i i i � i i i � i � � i i i i i � i i � � � � i i � i � � i i � � i � i � i i i i i i i � i � i � � � i � � i � � i i � i i � � � � i � � � � i i i i i i i i .-. '-"""'� � � � � � i c�- d Y��______�a��__i��4�� __i__��___��.i��F�� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I 1 I 1 I 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �� I 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I C 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 _��______1____��__J____�____1____��__L��_�_____1___ __��J�__��__L�_��____� O r 1 1 1 1 1 1 � `O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 •V 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 � � ��_____L��j___��____1��_j___��___j��__��j� ��1��_�� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � — � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � c � � � � � � � •� i � i � i � i i � � i i � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � � � � i � � i � � i p � i � � � i i i p + O M O � O � O � O t� O � M M N N � � (isd)puo8 -� � Y � 'N � � � � ti � � 0 � � .- � � M U m ririr� �- � � cv ° � 'a c � � O N f� CO O � 1� L � O O M OD � 1� M � ,� O O O O � •- N � +� +� t � 0000000 N N w w � .� Y � .Q C �(n O p � o0 1� v �n o� co co 1� "a M � CYj !� M ' (D N 00 M � O r M N N � c�6 N � � � �t tfl f� � � � N '„� C� � p J � �I' �t � N � N N N N � N „ � n � '� O � � � (1 J J J J J J �� O LL � Z �� C � II 'O � F- f- H I- H -a f0 m � � w+ c a� to � 0 � � � 0 � ca N C� � N -� � N O Q � Q u� O tn O O Q N O � G� -� J U� � �� J N tL') I� O N � J `.. f0 �y G� •C C � N N _l � O O O .- �- � X C .E LL Q L, p � � O H t6 � O d z a mu. cn = om � m � Soil Nail Proof Testing Wall Designation: Noell Residence, 0+90 Main Wall Design Test Load:23750 Ib 23750 Job Number: 213-134 Bond Length: 10 feet Testers: KA Free Length:9 feet Date: October 7,2013 Stress Length: 1.12 feet Load Hold Time Load Pressure Total Movement Residual Elastic Ibs) psi inches) (inches) (inches AL(.10 DTL) until stable 4070 400 0.000 0.25DTL until stable 5938 553 0.174 0.50DTL until stable 11875 1034 0.309 0.75DTL until stable 17813 1515 0.419 1.00DTL until stab�e 23750 1996 0.684 1.25DTL until stable 29688 2477 0.963 1.50DTL 1 min 35625 2958 1.266 0.626 (Creep Test) 2 min 1.271 (Hold�0 3 min 1.272 min-minimum) 5 min 1.272 6 min 1.272 10 min 1.274 20 min 30 min 50 min 60 min AL(.10 DTL) until stab�e 4070 400 0.640 Preliminary Acceptance: 0.008 Must be less than 0.04 inches- If necessary hold to 60 min (6 to 60 less than 0.08 inches) Comments: ram pulling into drill hole O '� � � ' i i i i � i � � i � i i � � i i � � � i i � i � � i i i i � � � � � i � i � i i � � � � � i � i � � � � i i i � � � i i � � N "_"""}--'---"'�'_""'_'�.._'- ' --f--"--"'�""'_"�.�"�""'__�-"'--"- . i i i � i � � � t � � � i i i i � � i i i � � � � � i � � � � � � i i i i � � � i i i i � � � i i � � i i i i i � � O � i ��_��r_��__��y��t��__��__ �_�� __��y__�___��rt�__�� 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 � � � I 1 � � � � j 1 1 � � � j 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 � 1 y 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 d � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � t I 1 0 � ---------L---------i---------�----------h---- ----t---------i--- ----�--------- CO c � � � � � ; ; ° - � , , � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � c ; � � � � � °' � � � � � � � E � � , � � � � � � � > � � ' � � � ii i i � ______'_y__________�_________ "-"'--_�--'---"';'_"'--'_t"--"--'i--"""'� � ; . � � � � i i � O ��-' � � i � i i i i i i i O i i i i ~ i i i � � � � � i i � � � � i i i i � � � � � i i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � p i � --------� � ' � �'--"--�' V ---------�---------i- �----°--°�---------t------- -1----°----� , � � � � � � o � � � � � � � � � � � R � � � � � � , � � � � � � � w � � � � � � � '� � � ; � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � (� i � � � � � N t--'-"-'-r-"'--"-*-"'---'-y-------'-' '--°--- ��_��__*��y��'��_�� 1 1 1 . � 1 1 1 1 I 1 � � � 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 � 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � ; ; 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I 1 I � � 1 1 � � � 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 � O Q� � i + � p � m � N p � O tn O (ISd)pU08 'a � Y � � �y r� a� rn ao t� r� t� � � �rirnni Um N M I� � c- � N N d � C 'a � O �' 6� O� � M Cfl O � O f� O � a0 (O CO d' i N .� O e- M rt CD 6> N CO � L p O O O O O O � O .N N N N N U � `�' N N N C Y � � � v- � r- • � O 6� N � � N p � � � 1� "D t[> M O a0 � (p �n M � � � M 'p O a0 � �[> 00 N � � � N r M N f� p S o � 00 OO I� CU CO Q . c'7 � � I� Mrn �n � � Q� � p J d' tn �- c- N N M y = e- � N I I �' � Q �� I� � � �� w 11 J .JJJJJ �� p �L G1 Z �p� � II 'a I- F-- I-- F- I-- H "� � m ++ C N � �p J � � � � � � J I6 L7 � � O � O �A O Q 0 � O � � J J y � N J a N �C'7 t� O N � J Q lC X � � •O C � N � -I � O O O � � � � � a z a m° � v� = om � m° � Soil Nail Proof Testing Wall Designation: Noell Residence, 0+?? Main Wail Design Test Load: 23750 Ib 23750 Job Number: 213-134 Bond length: 10 feet Testers: KA Free Length:9 feet Date: October 7, 2013 Stress Length: 1.12 feet Load Hold Time Load Pressure Totai Movement Residual Elastic (Ibs si) (inches inches) (inches) AL(.10 DTL) unti�stable 4070 400 0.000 0.25DTL until stable 5938 553 0.156 0.50DTL until stable 11875 1034 0.402 0.75DTL until stable 17813 1515 0.594 1.00DTL until stable 23750 1996 0.901 1.25DTL until stable 29688 2477 1.171 1.50DTL 1 min 35625 2958 1.478 1.004 (Creep Test) 2 min 1.488 (Hold 10 3 min 1.504 min-minimum) 5 min 1.506 6 min 1.511 10 min 1.513 20 min 30 min 50 min 60 min AL(.10 DT�) until stable 4070 400 0.474 Preliminary Acceptance: 0.035 Must be less than 0.04 inches- If necessary hold to 60 min (6 to 60 less than 0.08 inches) Comments: ram pulling into rebar face . . � � c ao � � o = cn -no � Z '� � o 3 x � � � 000 r (n � � vN, r °� ``p' �D Q � D o DocNn °oc~s, ocNnD � m v � � � � � O � � Q � � � � � � � � -i -i � --i � --i n. II 3 � �� Z y �11 � i� ii rrrrrr ii � i� � O � °- �� " N � m n � � � N w rv t� � � cn A r o c;'� � _I � <3'� V N O�o CJ3� � � W J m a1 p N � GJ .� W U7 � � CT 00 O W CT � � � Q..� � � � O � 00 V7 . C7� J� N CO O O N N s �' �' n fD fD (D N - O � � O O O O O � � � •-' �" 'a � A � CO U7 .P -• O � � � �J �I �I O CO O CT O � � 00 � � A N � O �p Q 7 Q � N N � � � �1 W N p n W GO U1 � '� p� �1 �I OD Cfl CO �I � Q �D � IV Q. Bond (psi) � N N W W � O Vt O Cfi O CJ� O Ut O p O + � � � ' ' i i i •J O � � � i � � � � i i i � � � � � � � ' � i i i � � i � i � � � � i i 3 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i i i � � � � � � N --"'-'- � '--""'� 1 � i ' f"'-"-"a----""'�-""-"'±'----_"'�'_"-----i""_"" � p � � � � � � � � i � � i N � � � i i � i d � � � � � � i i i 1 � � i 1 � j j 1 1 1 � � � � ; 1 � 1 � � � � - 1 I � � 1 1 O 1 1 � � � 1 � � ' �� .��+�� 1 A ---------�---- - F---------�---------i- �- , � o ; ; � � � ; � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � � ' � � � � ; ; � � � � � , � � � � ' ' � � � � � o � ; � � � � � -1 b� --------- ---------�-- -----�---------�---------±---------�---------�--------- 0 0 � � � ; ; ; � � � ' � � � ; � _ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ; p � � � � � 3 0 � � � ' � � �_'_____�J__��__� L�'_'��_ 1��_��J��'_'1�_��'_'��L____�__�_1_'�"'___ � 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ � � 1 I � � K � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � j 1 � 1 1 1 1 I I 1 � 1 I 1 � � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 I � 1 1 1 I � j j I I 1 1 1 y __--_--_� � � 1 1 1 1 � . _ _ ____�_________T_____�__��________�T__�______ pr--"---°�-"-_' *'-- � � � � O i i i � � i i � � � i i � � � � i i � i � � i j i 1 � � � i 1 � � � j 1 1 � , 1 1 1 � � � � 1 1 I � 1 1 I � � � � ��__'1��L__'��_�1��__�� N �_'��___�l____��_j_��__��j�_'� �� 1 0 � � � � � ' ' 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 � � 1 1 1 � � � � j j I � � 1 1 � � � � 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 � 1 1 1 1 � I � 1 1 1 � � � 1 1 � � j 1 � Y ��'__f_�__��__�.__��____.��_ _��7______�__i_�'__'___�..____��__ ��"�� ' O 1 1 1 1 � � � � 1 1 � � � 1 � 1 1 � � 1 1 1 � � 1 � � 1 1 1 1 � � 1 � � � j 1 � � 1 1 ' 1 ' � I � � 1 1 1 1 � � j � 1 � � � � Q � � �� s� . , . . �- � �r �.- l �� l� �1 �- � i �� EicPc+��ith P�3�11 il.C�cot��nnical,Inc. �—j � SC��?Q C c�titti4�i�t� �5�} t;len<<r�xl�i�nn C,ulc�raclu S]6'�1 1'l�uni:97l)�-9�i�-7`3��s HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL p.,,� ��,�;,g:��_�;,{,�} etn<1i1:I�I�;;eu.�'h��e,eotec 1�.c�,i r� November 12, 2013 �� i�^ ��? 7 Triumph Development � � � � `V/ !� Attn: Mike Foster D 12 Vail Road �� j� Vail, Colorado 81657 � (mikef(�7triuinphdev.cam) TOWN C�F VAIL Job No. 1 l 3 048C Subject: Observation of Partial Excavation, Proposed Master Bedroom Area,Noell Residence, Lot 6, Spraddle Creek, 1000 Spraddle Creek Road, Vail, Colorado Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the partial excavation at the subject site on November 6, 2013 to evaluate the soils expased for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recormnendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our fmdings in a report dated April 15, 2013, Job No. 113 048A. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in our subsoil study report. The cut to the north side of the building area has been retained with a soil nail wall. Only the Master Bedroom Suite area in the extreme western portion of the residence had been dug at this tiine. This area and the area reported as observed below are the wall footings along 20 Line from V to Z, and along Y and Z Lines, as well as the keyway footing are to the south-southeast of these wall lines. Spread footings bearing on the natural coarse granular soils designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf were recommended for foundation support in our previous report. At the tinle of our visit to the site,the foundation excavation for the above area had been cut in generally two levels from about 4 to 4%2 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavations consisted of relatively dense, clayey silty sand and gravel with cobbles and boulders. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils and the subgrade compacted. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and Parkcr 30.3-�41-711� • C`,alc�rr�c�t� Sprrn�;s 719-633-5562 • �il��ertht�n�e 97Q-�}C�-19�9 . - Triumph Development Navember 12, 2413 Page 2 concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Other recommendations presented in aur previous report which are applicable should also be observed. . The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation ofthe soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation c;ould increase the risk offoundation movement. We should be advised ofany variations encountered in the excavation conditians for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. � If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTF��INICAL, INC. �,e��e e eo�o e �y4. �� .�.��'�/!�e � �.j p,� p��iD �✓� b'a V.,�'��, � ��.f' a� s a a David A. Young, P.E. � �'��' ��e � o � DAY/ljg ��t� �' �-�c ti�,, o� , � ��p'?�t.k°ee��rZ"�/�`�ty,��e° p,�s�.�Mac1WeO r1t`�q ��d�A��'�'�4.��m� cc: Triumph Development—��s�Coggins (travisCcr�triumnhdev.c�m) Beck Building Company—Tom Solawetz(tom�i;beckbuilc�s.ca�n) Beck Building Company—Kevin Fifield (kevin�beckhuilds.can�) RMT Architects—Paul Miller(��aul u.rmtarchitects cam) Job No. 113 0�$C Get�t@C�'1 ' ' �Z o�eK �a�e @ _ �- �,� , � �� ,�, R� £ g � . . ,. . �' �'�'�.�a�°G�tm ay 1 t 1GC� �CA`�4dWF ��,,��/�}�� .•l'�,k� ,. •?"t i.a, . £,� �'�.�,,-351�'"�.i✓fw'"� v;2�A ��.. '6,�" �y,;,�:...wt.1;, �",�,4 , .. , ,. .. . S-?i � �r „=[":(,4 .�f!�.' '& l.d�-. "�7�. .5<; l. (. ?`;.e... . .., . .,` 'i�. . . <. , z . ri ... , ,. Janua7•y�}, 2f_}14 D � � � � M � � (� �� _ O�� 7 Triu�nph Develc��tn�nf �} At�il: �i�C��"05��1' ��€:• � �v �� 12 Vail Raaci ��t, col��t7 st�s� TOVI/N c�� /,q�� ( �i��; � I.�i� rz�,�itfr��v.��,��) Je�i�No. �13 0�8C Sut�jeet: 46servatiQn ofPartiai Excavatior�,Froposed Gara�e Arca, �c��11 R�sidence,Lat f�, Spraddle Creek, 1 C}00 S�racicll�Cre,�� 1�.oad, Va.il, CalcsA•ado Dear Mike: As reques#ed, a re�resenCative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. abserved tile partial excavation at the subject site c►n December 17, ?U13 #o evaluate tl�e soils ex�osed f�rr Foundation support, The findii�gs ofotu-observatians and x•ecamrnenciatic�ns fbr the founciation desigz are peesented in this�•eport. We previcsusly canductec� a subso�I study fc�r design of foundations at the site and presented c�ur findin�s in a report dated psprii 15, 2013, J�b Nc�. 113 04$E1. We observed the foatirrg area excavatian for Che Master Bed�oorn area at the residence and presented our observati�ns i:ra a Ietter diztec��c�vefnber 72, 2Q13. � The pi'oposed eons�ruction is silnilar to thaf discussed in our subsoil study rep€�rt. The cut ta the n�rth side c�£the buziding area has been retained��ith a s�il nail wa11. The narth Garage faatin�s exca�:•atian adjacent t�the botto�l�of th�soil nail ��all and connecting fo�stings excavation fr�m the wes�side of the Garage ta the r�sid�lce had be�t� du�;at this tiin��nd were Iocated alang�Gric�Line�A-E, 4- fi and Grid Lines E-H oz� Line##2U, respectively. Spread fc�otii�gs bearing on the natural coarse gr�lular sc�ils desi�n�d for ar� altowable bearin�pressu.re of 3,000 p�f werc recommez}tied for f:c�unci�tinn sup�oa�t it,our previous report. At the tin�e c�f aur visit to the site, tl�e foundatic�t�excavation tc�r the abc�ve area h�3ei been cut in benerally t�,vo l�vels fr�tn abnut�t tcr G f�et b�law rhe a�3j�cent ground surtace. The soil�exp�sed in the botton�c�f the exc;avations car�sisted of relatively dcn�e, c;la��ey silty sand and gravr;l with cobiales�nc�baulders. Na fre�rvatez•r�fas encc�iinte��ed in the excavation and the sails were sli�htly�moist to mc�ist, Thc soil cc�n�itions ex�oscd in the exeavatioii are c�r�si�tei�t��i.th thos��re�ic�usly eucc��.iz7ter�d on the site and st�itable fo�-support i�f s�r�acl�`+�otin�s de�i�r�ed tt��-tl�e recr�m�nctnd�d allar��able bearing��ressuB•e af 3,Ot7€7 psf: Loose;,arz� disturbecl st�ils s}�c�u1d be rernc�veci in the ft�oti.�i�;a��eas tcr exp�se tl�e ur�disturb�d n�tuz-a( cc►ars��;r�.�nul�ar soils €'�� " ' H '�"•" Sa_ -;;?�(^Zi �`� � i ,;�i'tI"i�,a�fo- `r�:€li�tt� f4�J-Esj� � z � 7 t �. ,,��, 7" �;;�. ."'136f.'3"s°�-<€stt">�' .}�s ��is;�� .f;-�.) Trium�h I7evetopment Jan�ary 9, 2t31� Page 2 az�d thc�ub�-adc compacted. `�he bearing soils shaulci be pr�tccteci f�om �`rast�nd conc�•ete shauld not b�placet� an#i-r�zen st�ils. Otl�er recc�ll�mcndatic�ns pres�ntec�in aur previt�us rep�rf�vhich are applicabte shc�uld also be c�bser�ec�. 'Fh�recamrr�end�tic��s sub�nitted in this letter ar�l��sed cir c�u�ut�s�rvatia�z��'�he sc�ils exposed within the foundation�xcavatian and t1�e previous Izmited subsurface�plt�ratic�n at the site. Variations in the subsurface canditic��is l�elc��=tl�e ex�:�v�fiic�iz �c��zld incre�s�. th�risk of foundatic�n znoi�em�;z�f. We shauld�e acivised c��`a�1}fi vai-iatians encaunt�.r€:d in the excavaticrn canditinns for pc�ssible chan,�es to recflinrnendation�ca��tained in this let�er. If you have any questions�r tieed further assistance,please call au�°�ffice. Sinc�rely, HEPWQRTH—PAWI,AI�GEUT HNICAL, INC .��_�t�`F �`+`v,�c� A, t��.� `x ,�. .Ta�nes A. Parker, P.E.; P.G. ; �'�� ; �;�� r ��i�� .�, . Rev. by: DAY ''�`�:-. '� '�`�l�NA4��`�� JAP(ksvv - cc; Triumph Deveiopment��--Travis CQggins{t�°<�,��,,�a�tr�,��f�s:1�� r��) BeckBuildingConipany—Tom Solawetz ��,��{,�,��,��;��J �.��s��) �_.__ Beck Building C�'ornpany—I�ev�n Flfelci (�ti�:��t��,��i��.��P��,i�� >��j RMT Architects—Paul Miller{�� g�';� �_��t��t�� _�.v.�#,,��) � .__.. - -- .__ 3ob�to_ I 23(3�1�G -°---- � t�ti:.h : .�. � � ,� 1,�G�. -�',� P�! � � �r��( s� ��,� �S t'�C 3 ;.3�3- �',f . � � `' t q . .... "� �� . - , € _ . . �, ., u ,.,. i"i�„�3akF�.3'. §'.i e"t,�`§ 4�&£�5'„ E.t�..�XflA.,..�Z' ��r�� " .. #t ..�i.- ! .„=, .... .. ..-... � � .r,..�.>..i.l January 30, 201� ._.,...._.._ �� # � 1�- ��"�� Triurnph Developrrsent D � � � � � � Attn; Mike Foste�• IZ v��xa�� 1 � �t114 Vail, Coloraclo 8165? ��1��>>��,��,�>�,��.�:�„ > TOWN C)F VA�L � Jc�b�l�o. 113 �I�SC �al�ject: C?bset-e3ation of Pa�-tial Excavatic�n, P��oposed Poal A.rea,Noe11 Residence, Lc�t 6, Spraddl�Cr�ek, �OQQ Spraddle�'reek Road,�tail, �olaradc� Dear Mike: As requested, a representative of He�wc�rtiz-1'awlak Geotechnical ctbserved the pas-kial excavdtian at the subject site an January 27, 2414 tc� evaluate the sails exposeci for fou��datian support. The�ndings of our c�bservatic�ns anc�recom��er�dations t�r the foundat`ro�a design are presented in this report. 'Ut�e previausly�o��ductecf a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our tinclangs in a re�cr�-t dated April 15, 2013, Job Na. ]13 048A. We abserved the fac�ting area excavations for the Master �ed�'oom area and hrorth Garage area at the residence and presented our c�bservatians in tetters dated 1�1nvelnber 1�, 2013 and January 9, 20 t 4 under our.Tc��N. 11� 04�C. The proposed canstruction is srrnilar to that discussed in our subsail study re�c�rt. Tt�e paol will be aIon�the sc�utl�side of the reszdence anc� at tha main 1evel adj�cent crawls��ace area af the residence, approxim�tely 6etwee�7 Griri Lines T-Q��,d 7- 13. Tlie poai will be supparted on relatively tall faUncia#ian wall�and cot�necting�,�rade 6eaans. Spread foatings bearixag on tlie naturai cc�arse�ran�iar soils ciesi�ned far ars alir�wable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf�tere reconimencied for foundatiQn support iz�aur previc�us report. At fl�e time of our site visit, fhe foundation excavatic�n for the abave atea Ixad bcen cut iu �;enerally three lec>els fram about 10 to 20 feet belcsw t��e adjacent�,�-ound su�-face. The sails e�pos�d in the bi�ttnm of the excavat�on cc�n�isted ofr�ia�ively dense, clay�y siity sand and gr�vel with cobbtas ancI baulders. We und�rstand the sou�h u°�11 iine�nc�an area af the nc�rthern portie�n c�f the excavation lxad been �rverclu�ab�ut 1 tp ? feet citze ta unsuitable sails. No free water was encvuntered i�l th.e excav�tior�4ar�d the sails ti�ere sligl�tly moist ta mois2. The sc�il conditions expc�se�1 in the exc�vation are c�nsistent with thc��e�revi«usly c:ncountered on fhe site az�tl suitahle far support of spreacl toc�tin�s ciesi��necP for tlae rec�mineg�r�ed aliowable bea�•in�;pressure c�f 3,000 psf. Ltia�e anc3 clfsturt�ed sc�ii5�hc�uld be remo��ed in the fac�ting areas to ex�c�se the undisturl�ed�iatt�t°al cc�ar�;e�ranu7ai°sozls �?.�!`��.taC )c�)-s�ti*��°(1 ��} �' �,c3€a:t€ lt�.; `�j(�C1F1+,.'.4 d �;°�.�j�i �-'7�"�(-�,? � °�I�t.�,�p.�.Yt�€E"?�` '�r�� —��3,"5 �`,?�<) YTritmtph Developinent January 30, 2014 Page 2 and tl�e subgrade�:ornpacted. The bearing sc�r�s should t��prc�tectccl frotn frnst and concrete should nQt be placed on froren sc�ils, Other recomm�ndrtti€��s preser�ted in au�• previous report which are applicat�le shQUld also be c>bserved. Along Ghe north wail Iine�,f tl�e excavation, at apprc�ximate Urid Lines�tc� R ana I 3, abouf an 8 feet diame;ter 6�ulder was encoun#erec� th�at�vas very hard and extremely �iif�cult to�-�m�ve, and is desired to he left in piace. T�e bc�ulder wiil exte�7r1 abc�ut� teet �p�in�to the bo�tc�nl ot th�founc�ation wail. It shoulc�l�e feasible tn lea�•e tl�e boulder in �alace and constnict the��aIl ove�•the�a�uldc:r�rc�vid�d ti��v��ail r�,inf�rc��nent is dc�welled into the boulder as recommended by tl�e structural en�in�er�1d the boulder surface is relatively flat wvhere in contact with the bottoin af the e.�all. The recomrnendatic�n�sui�initted in this letter are based c�n our abse�-�,ation of the soils expos�d within the foundati�n exca��ation and tl�e previc�tts liXnit�el suhsurface explorati�n at the site. Variations in the subsurface canditzc�ns below the excavation cc�ulc�increase the risk of foundation movement. We shoulc3 be aduised of any variatians encountered in tlze excavation condition��or possible chan�es fo reco�nmenciafians contai�led in#his letter. If yau have any questions ar need further assistance, please call our office. SincerelY> HEPWORTH--P AK ��C�Qj�iZCAL, INC. �`�� •� ��tj'�'� r " ••�'� i : i�. ,�9* .. = �� r .. .. David A. Young, P.E��: 32:2f� ,� .° - '��-�-� .. DAYiksw ��,,��w�«�«,.��+► t'��lt�tr��►+�� cc: 7'riumph D�v�;lopmenfi–Travis Cc�g�i�j{��;a�z;�:��;� ��,��} Beck Buildin�Cc�z�lpany–To�n Sota�uetz i�� ,.��, ��;��} Beck Buittii��g Carn��uy–Kevirz Fifield(�,�,,i,�£��,,µ�£��.�.�,��) RMT Archftects–Faul iVliller(��u�r��r�za��t��;��it��t�.��a��) - iVlc�nrae&Neweli- Crai�;Carroll �`��r��,��$��i€�:_��_�.�:,��4,��} - _,.—..� . Job Ivc>_ 113 f��A�; — —_ _. ��-.��t.�7��f't _ . ..-- Kevin Fifield From: Dave Young [dave@hpgeotech.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:59 AM To: Kevin Fifield Cc: ccarroll@monroe-newell.com;jfehler@monroe-newell.com; Tom Solawetz; 'Mike Foster' Subject: RE: Emailing: Boulder at pool wall Grid 13- R-Q I'm ok with this, Kevin. Will cover in the ex ob letter regarding the soils. We need relatively flat on top of the boulder for the wall to site on. Also, I would think 12" to 16" penetration into the boulder with the vertical rebars. David A. Young, P.E. Senior Project Engineer HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Fifield [mailto:kevinf@beckbuilds.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 9:38 AM To: Dave Young Cc: ccarroll@monroe-newell.com; jfehler@monroe-newell.com; Tom Solawetz; Mike Foster; Kevin Fifield Subject: Emailing: Boulder at pool wall Grid 13 - R - Q Dave, The pictures show the rock we talked about yesterday. It is on Grid 13 between R and Q to the right side of the grade beam below the pool. There will be about 8' of rock in the wall form and three feet above the footer. The steel design that is on S1.2 # 6 shows 3 #5 rebar in the footer and # 5 at 1'4" running vertical and horizontal in the wall that we plan to drill into the rock and hope this will be ok. I will need to get letters of approval from you and also Monroe & Newell for inspections. Thanks, Kevin Fifield Beck Building Co. 970-904-1283 Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Boulder at pool wall Grid 13 - R - Q 001 Boulder at pool wall Grid 13 - R - Q 002 Boulder at pool wall Grid 13 - R - Q 003 Boulder at pool wall Grid 13 - R - Q 004 Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 1