Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOTC13-0027 Grouse Glen at Vail Condominiums Design Review Administrative Appeal Memo and Attachements 110613TOWN OF 0) VAIL' Memorandum TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 6, 2013 SUBJECT: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of an administrative action approving an asphalt shingle roof material for the Grouse Glen at Vail Condominiums, located at 1470, 1472, 1474, 1476, 1478, and 1480 Buffehr Creek Road /Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 2, A part of Parcel A (Grouse Glen at Vail), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (OTC13 -0027) Appellants: Wendy St. Charles and Reven Wright Planner: Warren Campbell I. SUBJECT PROPERTY The Grouse Glen at Vail Condominiums, is located at 1470, 1472, 1474, 1476, 1478, and 1480 Buffehr Creek Road, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 2, A part of Parcel A (Grouse Glen at Vail), in Vail, Colorado. II. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JURISDICTION Pursuant to Section 12- 3 -313-1, Appeal of Administrative Actions; Authority, Vail Town Code, the design review board shall have the authority to hear and decide appeals from any decision, determination or interpretation by the administrator with respect to the provisions of the Title 11, Design Guidelines, Vail Town Code. III. PROCEDURAL CRITERIA FOR APPEALS Pursuant to Sections 12- 3 -313-2 and 12- 3 -313-3, Appeal of Adminisitrative Actions; Initiation and Procedures, Vail Town Code, there are three basic procedural criteria for an appeal: A) standing of the appellant; B) adequacy of the notice of appeal; and C) timeliness of the notice of appeal. A) Standing of the Appellant The Community Development Department has determined that the appellants, Wendy St. Charles and Reven Wright, have standing as an aggrieved or adversely affected person. Staff's determination is based upon the following considerations: 1. The appellants are aggrieved persons as they are the owners of two units within a four unit building. 2. The decision of the administrator directly affects the appellants and their property. B) Adequacy of the Notice of the Appeal An Appeals Form was filed by the appellants on October 7, 2013. The Appeals Form and the materials required for its submission have been determined to be complete by the Community Development Department. A copy of the Public Notice of the Design Review Board public hearing, November 6, 2013, was sent to adjacent property owners, pursuant to Section 12- 3 -3B -3, Procedures, Vail Town Code. C) Timeliness of the Notice of Appeal The Administrative Section of the Town's Zoning Code (12- 3 -3B -3, Procedures) states the following: 'A written notice of appeal must be filed with the administrator or with the department of community development rendering the decision, determination or interpretation within twenty (20) calendar days of the decision becoming final. If the last day for filing an appeal falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a town observed holiday, the last day for filing an appeal shall be extended to the next business day. The administrator's decision shall become final at the next planning and environmental commission meeting (or in the case of design related decision, the next design review board meeting) following the administrator's decision, unless the decision is called up and modified by the board or commission. Such notice shall be accompanied by the name and addresses (person's mailing and property's physical) of the appellant, applicant, property owner, and adjacent property owners (the list of property owners within a condominium project shall be satisfied by listing the addresses for the managing agent or the board of directors of the condominium association) as well as specific and articulate reasons for the appeal on forms provided by the town. The filing of such notice of appeal will require the administrative official whose decision is appealed, to forward to the planning and environmental commission (or the design review board in the case of design guidelines) at the next regularly scheduled meeting, a summary of all records concerning the subject matter of the appeal and to send written notice to the appellant, applicant, property owner, and adjacent property owners (notification within a condominium project Town of Vail Page 2 shall be satisfied by notifying the managing agent or the board of directors of the condominium association) at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the hearing. A hearing shall be scheduled to be heard before the planning and environmental commission (or the design review board in the case of design guidelines) on the appeal within thirty (30) calendar days of the appeal being filed. The planning and environmental commission (or the design review board in the case of design guidelines) may grant a continuance to allow the parties additional time to obtain information. The continuance shall be allowed for a period not to exceed an additional forty (40) calendar days. Failure to file such appeal shall constitute a waiver of any rights under this title to appeal any interpretation or determination made by an administrator." An Appeals Form was filed with the Community Development Department within the twenty (20) day requirement. A hearing was scheduled to be heard before the Design Review Board on the appeal within thirty (30) calendar days of the appeal being filed. IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL On October 7, 2013, an appeals form was submitted to the Community Development Department by the appellants. The appellants are appealing the final decision of the administrator of September 17, 2013, with respect to over the counter re -roof application OTC13 -0027. A complete copy of the appeals form, received October 7, 2013, has been attached for reference. In sum, the appellant is appealing the administrator's approval of the use of GAF's Grand Sequoia Cedar colored asphalt shingles to replace the existing wood shingle on their roofs. The appellants do not believe the asphalt shingle selected by the HOA is an appropriate roof material for their units and is aesthetically unacceptable. V. REQUIRED ACTION To Uphold /Overturn /Modify the Administrator's decision. Section 12 -313-5, Findings: "The planning and environmental commission (or the design review board in the case of design guidelines) shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title have or have not been met." Town of Vail Page 3 VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Design Review Board upholds the September 17, 2013, decision of the administrator approving an over the counter re -roof permit application to use GAF's Grand Sequoia Cedar colored asphalt shingles to replace the existing wood shingle on their roofs, located at 1470, 1472, 1474, 1476, 1478, and 1480 Buffehr Creek Road /Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 2, A part of Parcel A (Grouse Glen at Vail), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (OTC13 -0027) In accordance with the information presented in this memorandum, and the exhibits attached hereto, staff recommends the Design Review Board makes the following finding of facts based upon the evidence and testimony presented: • The Grouse Glen at Vail Condominiums are located at 1470, 1472, 1474, 1476, 1478, and 1480 Buffehr Creek Road in Vail, Colorado, and zoned High Density Multiple - Family (HDMF) according to the Official Zoning Map of the own of Vail. • When Phase 2 of Grouse Glen at Vail ( Buffehr Creek Townhomes) was reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board in 1991 all dwelling units shared a common roof material. • The Design Guidelines were duly adopted by the Vail Town Council, in the best interest of the community as a whole, and are the established criteria for which all design review applications shall be evaluated. • The Design Guidelines consider the overall architectural integrity of a structure and do not consider a lack of visibility to allow for a deviation to this policy. • Section 12- 11 -4C -3, Staff Approval, Vail Town Code, states the following with regard to administrative review. 3. Staff Approval: The administrator may approve any of the following applications: a. Any application to modify an existing building that does not significantly change the existing planes of the building and is generally consistent with the architectural design, including, but not limited to, exterior building finish materials (e.g., stonework, siding, roof materials, paint or stain), exterior lighting, canopies or awnings, fences, antennas, satellite dishes, windows, skylights, minor commercial facade improvements, and other similar modifications; b. Any application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent with the architectural design, materials and colors of the building, and approval has been received by an authorized member of a condominium association, if applicable; Town of Vail Page 4 c. Any application to remove or modify the existing vegetation or landscaping upon a site; and d. Any application for site improvements or modifications including, but not limited to, driveway modifications, site grading, site walls, installation of accessory structures or recreational facilities. In the above specified cases, the administrator may review and approve the application, approve the application with certain modifications, deny the application, or refer the application to the design review board for decision. All other applications shall be referred to the design review board. • Section 14- 10 -5F, Building Materials and Design, Vail Town Code, states, "All structures shall have class A roof assemblies or shall have class A roof covering materials, as defined by the adopted building code. The use of concrete tile, slate, metal, asphalt shingle, fiberglass shingle, and built up tar and gravel roofing may be permitted. Metal roofing, when permitted, shall not reflect direct sunlight onto an adjacent property and shall be surfaced with a low gloss finish or be capable of weathering to a dull finish. Metal roofing, when permitted, shall be of a heavy gauge and designed to provide visual relief to the roof surface (including, but not limited to, a standing seam). Asphalt and fiberglass shingles, when permitted, shall weigh no less than three hundred (300) pounds per roofing square. The use of wood shake, wood shingles and rolled roofing shall not be permitted. Two - family and multi - family dwellings shall be required to have uniform roof covering materials, except when the design review board determines that the materials are compatible, are integral to the architectural style of the structure and different materials do not share any ridges or planes, but may share a valley." • Section 14- 10- 5F -1(d) states; "1. Nonconforming Structures: All structures that do not have a class A roof assembly or class A roof covering material, or structures with wood shake or wood shingles shall come into compliance as follows: d. Developments With Multiple Structures: Upon reroofing a single structure that is part of a multistructure project with conforming roof covering materials that do not match existing materials, the conforming materials shall be deemed compatible with the existing nonconforming materials by the design review board. Upon reroofing of additional structures in the development, the materials shall match the approved Town of Vail Page 5 conforming materials. Should the matching material no longer be manufactured, a different material may be permitted, should the materials be deemed compatible by the design review board." • The applicable criteria for evaluation of a roof material application are contained in Section 14- 10 -5F -3, Roofing Materials, of the Vail Town Code. • Section 14- 10 -5F -3, Roofing Materials, of the Vail Town Code, states, "The use of any roofing material, including those not specifically identified by this section, shall only be permitted, unless otherwise prohibited by this code, where the design review board finds: a. That the proposed material is satisfactory in general appearance, quality overtime, architectural style, design, color, and texture; and b. That the use of the proposed material complies with the intent of the provisions of this code; and c. That the use of the proposed material is compatible with the structure, site, surrounding structures, and overall character of the town of Vail; and d. That the material is noncombustible or aids in the prevention of fires." • On September 13, 2013, the Grouse Glen at Vail Condominiums HOA submitted an over the counter application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department to re -roof the appellants structure. • Upon review of the submitted over the counter re -roof application (OTC13- 0027), the administrator found that the application was complete and submitted on behalf of the Grouse Glen at Vail HOA. • Upon evaluation of the over the counter re -roof application, the administrator found that the proposed roof material complied with the requisite criteria. • The finding of the material being compliant was based upon the following factors: 1. The GAF Grand Sequoia Cedar colored asphalt shingle is a class A roof covering. 2. The GAF Grand Sequoia Cedar colored asphalt shingle exceeds the 300 pound per roofing square requirement. Town of Vail Page 6 3. The GAF Grand Sequoia Cedar colored asphalt shingle is satisfactory in general appearance, quality over time, architectural style, design, color, and texture. 4. A site visit to the property was completed to visually confirm compliance of the proposed material with the architectural character of the structures. • Both TNT Contractors and Master Sealers are professionally licensed contractors which do not make a determination of the aesthetic appropriateness of a roof material in the Town of Vail codified design review process. • The • That the GAF Grand Sequoia Cedar colored asphalt shingle complies with all the requirements of Section 14- 10 -5F, Building Materials and Design, Vail Town Code. • The administrator appropriately and objectively evaluated the proposed over the counter re -roof application consistent with the purpose and intent of the Town's adopted Design Guidelines. VII. EXHIBITS The exhibits outlined below have been attached to the memorandum for the purposes of making a determination on the appeal. These exhibits help establish the public record of the development review process and the proceedings to date. The information provided within the exhibits may be used by staff and the appellant, as needed, during the course of the appeals proceedings. A. Appeals Form, stamped received October 7, 2013. B. Email from the Grouse Glen HOA President dated October 18, 2013 C. Copy of the over the counter application to re -roof stamped received on September 13, 2013 D. Copy of the Approved Roof and Elevations for Grouse Glen at Vail Condominiums (Buffehr Creek Townhomes) stamped approved on June 11, 1991 Town of Vail Page 7 TON OF VAIL" THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Design Review Board of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on November 6, 2013 at 3:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, 75 South Frontage Road West, Vail Colorado, in consideration of: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of an administrative action approving an asphalt shingle roof material for the Grouse Glen Condominiums, located at 1470, 1472, 1474, 1476, 1478, and 1480 Buffehr Creek Road /Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 2, A part e of Parcel A (Grouse Glen at Vail), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (OTC13 -0027) Appellants: Wendy St. Charles and Reven Wright Planner: George Ruther The applications and information about the final approval and appeal are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado. Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24 -hour notification. Please call 970- 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published in the Vail Daily October 19, 2013. rowN of va' ILJ Appeals Form Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Wail, Colorado 81657 Tel: 970 -479 -2128 www.vailqov.com Development Review Coordinator General Information: This form is required for filing an appeal of a Staff, Design review Board, or Planning and Environmental Commission action /decision. A complete form and associated requirements must be submitted to the Community Development Department within twenty (20) calendar days of the disputed actionldecision. ActionlDeciso b in a ealed: Issuance of �T B�uir ng Per - - Date of ActionlDecision: Appl Ica Ion Made 971 1720 13; Hepo e o have been approved 911972( (Board or Staff person rendering actionidecision: Warren Campbell Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land? -(�) - (yes) __a (no) If yes, are you an adjacent property owner? Q (yes) ,0 (no) Name of A pellant(s): Wendy S#Charles I Mailing Address: C/O 14/2 buff e r CreeR Hoad al Phone: Physical Address in Vail: ° U e r CreLsKi , Vai Legal Description of Appe Appellant(s) Signature(s): (Attach a list of signatures if SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, provide a detailed explanation of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person ". 2. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, specify the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appealed. 3. Provide a list of names and addresses (both mailing and physical addresses in Vail) of all owners of property who are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including owners whose properties are separated from the subject property by a right -of -way, strew 4. Provide stamped, addressed envelopes for each property owner listed i Submit this form and all submittal requirements to: Town of Vail OCT 0 ! 2013 Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VA�L For Office Use Only: Date Received: Activity No: Planner: Project No: 20113 -0305 .fir Wendy St. Charles 1472 BuEldir C:rcek Road, Vail CO 816 57 303 -947 -191 11�Ytil ['11x1 "�L`5L�i['�ryllll.riJm October 7, 2013 I. l` .,T1 M ITPIMI Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail Colorado 81657 Re: OTC Building Permit 13 -0027, PR1 13-0532 Dear Town Official/Design Review Board: now The owners of Units 8 and 10 within Phase 2 of Grouse Glen (originally developed as Buffehr Greek Townhomes) are aggrieved and adversely affected by the Town's action in issuing the above referenced permit for the following reasons: • The aggrieved persons are the owners of two townhome units within a four unit building. No roof on any unit in the four townhome building shares a plane or ridge or other intersection with any other roof. The roof of each unit is independent and separate from the other units, with two units ( #9 and #11) being three stories high and Units 8 and 10 being one and one -half to two stories high when viewed from the curb where the aesthetical appeal of the property is most critical. • The four townhome units are the only properties within the development affected by the issuance of the permit. The existing roofs are cedar shake shingle. • The purported association board signing the permit is comprised of owners in Phase 1, which buildings are much older, with different design and construction, with the only common design being the color of the stucco. The Phase 1 board seeks to alter and diminish the value of Units 8 and 10 as leverage in an unrelated dispute. • The roof line of the subject units do not have gables or other detail to add to the aesthetic appeal of the units and thus the compatibility of the roof material with the structures is critical to maintain aesthetic appeal and value. • Both TNT Specialty Contractors and Master Scalers recommended DaVinci, tile, metal (non - asphalt roofing product) to maintain the aesthetic appeal of Units 8 and 10. A copy of TNT's July proposal is attached. • Only after being regwred by the Phase 1 board to submit a proposal for asphalt roofing did TNT submit the proposal for asphalt replacement and submit for a permit, over the property owners' objections. • The four townhome units are of varying heights and design, with the subject units (8 and 10) having substantial visibility of the roofs from the approach to the units (curb), with up to 50% or more of the units' exposure being the roof as the unit is approached. Thus, the compatibility of the roof material is critical to the aesthetic appeal of Units 8 and 10. CI� • An architect and structural engineer consulted by the subject owners have booth agreed that the asphalt roofing will likely diminish the aesthetic appeal of Units 8 and 10. In contrast, the roofs on Units 9 and 11 are barely visible on approach to the property and the use of a different material on the two 3 story units may add desired character to the otherwise very plain design of the building generally. • Each unit is staggered (not aligned), such that the units share only a small portion of common wall. • Section 14 -10 -5 of the Town's code governs with respect to reroofing and provides that "[t]he use of any roofing material [] shall only be permitted [] where the design review board finds ... [t]hat the use of the proposed material is compatible with the structure...." The design review board has made no such finding. • A site visit and input from the design review board is critical to an appropriate determination of roof materials for Units 8 and 10. Both owners object to the use of asphalt because of the design of the units, so to protect against diminishing the aesthetical appeal and value of Units 8 and 10. • In issuing the subject permit, staff relies on its ability to issue an over - the - counter approval for reroofing generally, but staff is neither trained nor qualified to make design evaluations or determinations, particularly where (i) property owners object to a design change because the value of their property may be diminished, (ii) the Town has received no design input from the applicant, and (iii) the objecting owners are the most affected by the design change. The president of the Phase I board signing the subject permit has done so in contravention of any authority he may be deemed to have, given the ulterior motivation of using selection of roof materials as leverage in an unrelated dispute, which is in absolute contravention of the interests of the affected owners of Units 8 and 10. Unit 8 has been without covering on a portion of its roof since January of last winter, due to disputes as to other matters within the association. The owner of Unit 8 has requested that the Town approve immediate repair of Unit 8's roof (by that owner, at that owner's expense, with shake shingle, which is permitted by the Town's code for such limited purpose), so to protect the owner's property from further interior damage while the court has an opportunity to review the suit filed by the aggrieved property owners against the association. The Town's interests are most served by allowing owners to protect their property from damage and preserve values. The aggrieved owners request that the subject permit issued by staff be withdrawn or cancelled until the design review board reviews the matter, with a site visit, or until the dispute regarding the replacement roof materials is resolved in the court, so to preserve the aesthetic appeal of the subject properties and avoid the risk of diminishing their value. • Design review is also required for safety, as snow and large ice dams fall onto entries and walkways, and the proposed work by the Phase 1 board will not adequately address those concerns. PA Owner Name ST CHARLES, WENDY Owner Address 1472 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL, CO 81657 IF VAIL 7t of Community Development 7rontatge Road redo 81657 .E6 PAPER M p./`L,,..cj �wE 'Mtis%tr %55 -7t' 5-f 3 &I,Wer, CO 19030a. Property Owner- fi 1487 Bufl'ehr Creek Rand Vail, CO 81657 7Z V� Kenton M Krohlow 1040 Chambers Avenue #3 PO Box 2475 Edwards, CO 81632, United States GRACE SMITH 1460 Buffehr Creek RD Unit A, Vail, CO 81657 The Valley Condominiums c/o Amy L Gill PCB Box 3176 Vail, CO 81658 SCOUT I1 G WW S. G 0 U T I 1\1 61 1141G S G 0 U S C'Q U T I 1\1 G Owner Name — Unit 11 HURSH, DALE & PATRICIA 141 POORMAN RD BOULDER, CO 80302 Owner Name FOSTER, LINDA L. Owner Address 40 BRIARCREST PL COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 Owner Name WRIGHT, JOHN M. & REVEN S. Owner Address 21 RED FOX LN KEARNEY, NE 68845-7611 �iG�u�d �Y ►G n�nC� LA CO 61657 ,. SC0U i IIUG Owner List - Grouse Glen Phase 2 Townhornes Owner Name (Unit 8) WRIGHT, JOHN M. & REVEN Owner Address 21 RED FOX LN KEARNEY, NE 68845,7611 Owner Name (Unit 9) FOSTER, LINDA L. Owner Address 40 BRIARCREST PL COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 Owner Name (Unit 10) ST CHARLES, WENDY Owner Address 1472 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL, CO 81657 Owner Name (Unit 11) HURSH, DALE & PATRICIA Owner Address 141 POORMAN RD BOULDER, CO 80302 TNT ,Specialty Constructors, Inc. General Contractors - Master Roofing Contractors Mailing, P.a.Box 1508 Eagle, Co. 81631 -1508 www.tnts ep cialty.com trot- s- c @hotrnail.com (970)328 -1689 Torn Beck's (cell) 970- 337 -5081 Proposal &+Contract Agreement Date; 7 - 22 - 2413 Page 1 of 5 To� Dean Ericson, "Grouse Glenn" HOA Project Grouse Glenn, bldg. wlunits 8 -9 -10 & 11, Buffrehr Creek Rd., Vail, Co. All work performed per published, applicable building codes, (i.e., Uniform Building Code, International Building Code, International Residential Code), as per TNT Specialty Constructor's established, good workmanship and aesthetic practiceslstandards only. The fallowing is required contractual language, as per Colorado Senate Bill sB38, "The Consumer Pro tectionlRoafrng Bill':.... Effective 61612012,' 7) TNT specialty Con s tru c tars, Inc. shall hold in trust any payments received from you until TNT has delivered roofing materials at the site or has performed a majority of the roofing work on your property. 2) TNT Specialty Constructors, Inc., carries workers' compensation, automobile and commercial liability, (bodily and property damage) insurance. A certificate of insurance identifying our insurance carrier and the types & amounts of coverage and our insurance contact information is attached or will be provided to customer and is incorporated herein by reference and should be considered as part of this contract. 3) You have the right to rescind this contract and obtain a full refund of any deposit within 72 hours after entering the contract_ However, TNT specialty Constructors is entitled to compensation for custom or non- returnable items, as well as re- stocking fees, that have been ordered prior to any contract rescission. lfyou plan to use the proceeds of property and casualty insurance policy to pay for the roofing work, you may rescind this contract within 72 hours after you receive written notice from the property and casualty insurer that your claim has been denied in whole or in part. However, TNT Specialty Constructors. Inc., is entitled to retain payments or deposits to compensate TNT for roaring work actually performed in a workmanlike manner consistent with standard roofing industry practices. TNT specialty Constructors, Inc., cannot pay, waive, rebate, or promise to pay, waive, or rebate all or part ofany insurance deductible applicable to the insurance claim for payment for roofing work on your property. 4) Property owner is 1 is not intending to make payments from the proceeds of a property and casualty insurance policy. raye c ui o Scope of work; (Specifically and only as described below) - Roofing Procure applicable bldg._,pBrmits (atizrpays acrctal municipalities fees associated with permits) Demolifion, - - Remove & dispose of existing wood shakes Underla ment- - Provide over /on 4 00 % of existing solid wood roof sheathing, SIBS modified bitumen membrane, ice darn protection. DaVinci Shake system shall receive applicable additional underlayments to achieve UL Class A fire rating; a) Additional layer Vulca -seal G4Q b) ASTM D2626 18" shake inter -lace Sheet metal flashing; - Provide all applicable detail sheet metal components for a complete system, as follows; Da Vinci Shake system,` a) Custom 24 ga. pre - painted drip edge at rakes edges & eaves. b) Pre - painted `W' style valley metal c) Shop/field fabricated 24ga. pre - painted metal crickets at chimney chases. d) Custom 24 ga. "peak metal" at "shed roof' details. e) New plumbing vent pipe flashings, ("jacks") Concrete tiles stem a) 24 ga. drip edge at eaves b) `W' style, multi- ribbed, valley metal c) "J -pan" style side -wall (roof-to-wall) d) 24 ga. pre - painted counter - flashing at stucco -roof junctures e) 24 ga, pre- painted head -wall - hemmed leading edge. f) New mailable -type, ( "soft- aluminum "), flanged plumbing vent pipe fleshings, ( "jacks "). Elevated batten system for concrete the system application - Nominal 10 pre - manufactured /specific engineered elevated batten system. Continuous ridge v_e -nt system vageoaro Color TBD Jobsite kept "broom clean" at the end of each workday. All work performed in accordance with herein & above specifications/sequence/schedule, specifically and only, in a substantial workmanlike manner, for the sum of; DaVinci "Valore" shake system ...................................... $ 47,236 Westile concrete the system............ ..............................$ 44,886 (Owners shall pay engineer's structural report fees; $400 +I -} Additives; Manufacture designed /engineered, snow retention, as per prescribed per Town of Vail bldg. code amendments; - DaVinci Shake ...........................$ 1,876 - Concrete the .............................$ 3,542 Nate; Town of Vail also requires inspection /update of smoke £k CO2 detectors, along with all re- roof projects. TNT can provide such additional work at additional costs. If so required. Prices based on current market prices. Prices may vary dependent on material prices at time of actual work performed /materials ordered. Any and all work or materials performed /provided, not specifically identified above will be billed at the rate of $68.00 per man hour, plus materials, unless otherwise negotiatedlagreed to, in writing, as an addendum to this contract/ proposaI Exclusions per this contract agreement, but not limited to; Any existing structural conditions, Snow/ice removal, Snow/ice retention system design, Attic ventilation or design thereof, HOA approva'is, Mold issues, Consultants/advisors/third party opinions, unless so included in the above scope of work. Unpublished local building codes Wor amendments or particular building dept. inspectorlofficial's opinions. Payment schedule as follows; Owner shall pre -pay either material supplier directly or TNT Specialty Constructors for any portion of material utilized on the project in amounts specifically and only as approved by TNT Specialty Constructors, Inc. Notwithstanding any other agreement, herein or otherwise, in any event, payment shall be paid in full, net 30 days upon substantial completion of any work, or phase/portion thereof, in any 30 day period. rdyv, ;r u, v Retentions' (Limited to the following): Owne How ner's representative may, if ap;piicabie, retain a maximum of 10% of amount owed until such time as any particular phase or quantity of work completed in any 30 day time span, has been inspected by applicable building department, provided inspection has been performed in a reasonable time frame, (maximum of 10 days from date of notification of building department), regardless of time of year /weather conditions. Payment is due in accordance with schedule set forth above. The account must be paid in full in accordance with the payment schedule unless other arrangements are made, in writing. Late charges calculated at the rate of one and one half percent, (1 1/2 %), per month, eighteen percent, (18 %), annually will be charged on all past due balances and ownerlowner's representative agrees to also pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney fees. Should TNT be required to obtain an attorney to enforce this agreement, whether or not litigation is required, the non - breaching party shall be entitled to recover from the breaching party reasonable attorneys fees incurred as a result of such breach. In the event litigation occurs and a judgment is entered, the prevailing party, (as defined per this agreement; The party awarded any monetary value what -so -ever, shall be deemed the prevailing party), shall be entitled to any and all attorney costs from the non - prevailing party. Warranty(s); TNT Specialty Constructors, Inc. shall pass on the manufacture's warranties related to the materials installed. TNT warrants the workmanship of the materials installed for a period of SEVEN, (7), years after substantial completion of work, provided full, non - delinquent payment for work performed has been received. TNT expressly excludes all warranties expressed or implied including the warranties of merchantability and warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. TNT certifies that al labor and materials furnished, and work performed by them, are in accordance with the contract agreement, and authorized alterations, and additions thereto: And that, should any defect develop during the warranty period as hereinafter defined, due to improper workmanship, TNT, without expense to the owner, shall make the necessary repairs. This warranty does not apply to repairs required due to building settlement, defectivelimproper stucco, masonry, siding details, existing "grade"/ drainage, etc., or any other construction details related thereto. This warranty does not apply to repairs made by others and or lack of notice to TNT. The warrantee holder must contact TNT as soon as reasonably possible, At the sole discretion of TNT; Failure of timely notification or untimely payment for original work performed could result in TNT deemed not responsible for damages incurred. gage o oT o Owner /owner's agent assumes responsibility and liability for suitability of structure to accept materials/ system(s) proposedlinstalled, as well as possible framing member deflection during temporary weight transfer caused by ,+ demolitionlremoval of existing materials and the installation of the new material or systems), and results thereof. Owner realizes and assumes the risk of possible wall & ceiling finish damage to existing, due to construction operations. Owner assumes responsibility for all items /fixtures attached to walls /ceilings as they may fall from said surfaces &/or become damaged due to construction work performed. Owner/general/prime contractor should take reasonable precautionary measures so as to prevent possible damages- Owner/owner's agent assumes responsibility and liability for suitability of driveway to acceptlsupport contractor's as well as Vendors equipment required to perform the demolition and construction operations. TNT will not be responsible for any damage to driveways unless caused by negligence on the part of TNT. TNT will not be responsible for repairs required through damage(s) caused by building inspectors, consultants, or anyone else, other than TNT employees. TNT not to be held responsible for delays or damages caused by others, and not limited to; Product availability, material delivered by others, acts of god /nature„ (i.e., snow, rain, wind, etc...), or outside interference by ownerlowner's agent, consultants, building inspectors„ etc... Owner /owner's agent/general or prime contractor if applicable, agrees that the .r� work shall be completed specifically and only as per described above in "scope of work ", and that consultantsl advisor's of any kind, shall be involved at the "pre -bid" stage and /or "pre- construction" stage ONLY, if same chooses to utilize such a service, or include in this agreement, and in no circumstance shall, .: a consultant's opinion(s) be recognized unless such consultant and consultant's r' requirements /changes been included in this contract agreement, in writing, prior to any work beginning. Owner /owner's agent shall reimburse TNT reasonable monies for additional work, or work damaged through owner /owner's agenticonsultant(s), building inspectors inspection(s) and/or delays caused by 14V owner /owner's agent, generallprime contractor, consultants, building inspectors interfering with contractor's, (TNT), work. This proposal may be withdrawn &for modified by TNT Specialty Constructors, Inc. if not accepted within 30 days from hereon. Submitted this 22nd day of July, 2013 by, Thomas A. Beck Acceptance of proposal /contract: The above prices & conditions are acceptable & you are hereby authorized to proceed with the work described above. (sign) (print name) (date) Account Account: 8030445 Location Situs Address 001472 BUFFEHR CREEK RD # 10 Tax Area SC 103 - VAIL (TOWN) - SC 103 Parcel Number 2103 -122- 06-010 Legal Summary DESC: 1ST SUPP Subdivision: GROUSE GLEN AT VAIL Unit: 10 BK -0572 PG -0908 DEC 01 -28- 92 BK -0572 PG -0909 MAP 02 -1492 B K -0572 PG -0912 S W D 01 -30 -92 l.t e Owner Information Owner Name ST CHARLES, WENDY Owner Address 1472 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL, CO 81657 1017/13 1:41 PM Assessment History Actual (2013) $375,570 Primary Taxable $29,900 Tax Area: SC 103 Mill Levy: 46.9400 Type Actual Assessed Acres SQFT Units Improvements $375,570 $29,900 0.000 1470.000 0.000 Land 0.076 0.000 0.000 Sale Price Sale Date Reception Number 201305783 $660,(.)( 02/11/2008 20080321€3 '223 000 09/13/1996 $189,()()( 08/11/1993 Images • f1pto • Sketch Book Page B: 0705 P: 0627 B: 0616 P: 0698 http: // property. eaglecounty .us / assessor/ taxweb /account.jsw.accountNum— R030445 Page i of 1 Account Account: 8030446 Location Situs Address 001470 BUFFEHR CREEK RD #I l Tax Area SC 103 - VAIL (TOWN) - SC 103 Parcel Number 210.3-122-06-011 Legal Summary DESC: IST SUPP Subdivision: GROUSE GLEN AT VAIL Unit: 1 I BK -0572 PG -0619 DEC 01 -28- 92 BK -0572 PG -0908 DEC 01 -28 -92 BK -0572 PG -0909 MAP 02 -14-92 BK -0572 PG -0912 SWD 01 -30 -92 Transfers Owner Information Owner Name HURSH, DALE & PATRICIA Owner Address 141 POORMAN RD BOULDER, CO 80302 `7 Assessment Histo 1017113 1:42 FM Actual (2013) $412,330 Primary Taxable $32,820 Tax Area: SC103 Mill Levy: 46.9400 Type Actual Assessed Acres SQFT Units Improvements $412,330 $32,820 0.000 1501.000 0.000 Land 0.070 0.000 0.000 Sale Price Sale Date Reception Number 201305783 595 000 061241200,5 921127 $398-500 07/1012002 80315 $182,500 500 03120/1992 Images • Photo a Sketch Book Page B: 0576 P: 021 1 http l J property. eaglecount y. usl assessorltaxweb /account.jsp ?accoutitNurn= R030446 Page 1 of 1 "Wendy St. Charles" <+rustcharles @ieloud.cam>* charles9 cloud,com" <wstcharles@icloud.coma �( _ Unit 8 rouse Glen [� 47 October 7, 2013 3:03 PM 1 A1,tlatlhmnnf 7 dK l(R Sent from my Phone "Wendy St. Charles" cwstcharles @icloud.com>* Fwd: Unit- Grouse Glen 1� Begin forwarded message; Fro endy St. hales" "ws h ri �?�clo d cams Su sect: Unit 9 use Glen Dat o , 2013 3:00:49 i'M MBT To: "wstcharles @icio40 corn" tw ch rl icl u c ma .1r PL v V v October 7, 2013 4,02 PM 1 Attachment, 165 K13 "Wendy St. Charles" <wstcharles@icloud.com >(f "wstcharles @icloud.com" <wstcharles @icl0ud.coma Unit 10 Grouse Glen October 7, 2013 3:41 PM 1 Attachment, 164 KB Sent from my iPhone VP 1` �c �w It. .. - 1�, p 1 t,i 4 �9 a t Ilk W � 0 3 Warren Campbell From: Wyatt McCallie cwyatt.mccallie @gmail.eom> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 2:04 PM To: Warren Campbell; Carol Krueger, (113); Richard and Annie DeMarco, (46) Subject. Re: FW: Grouse Glen Roof Appeal Dear Mr. Campbell, Thank you for notifying Grouse Glen at Vail Condominium Association that Ms. St. Charles is apparently appealing a denial of a permit to replace roofing at Grouse Glen. Neither the Association nor its litigation counsel was notified by Ms. St. Charles or her counsel that she was applying for or appealing the denial of such a permit. As you may have surmised, she is extremely angry about the decision the Association Board of Directors has reached to re -roof our quadplex and one stand -alone unit with Grand Sequoia asphalt shingles. These five units constitute what we colloquially call our (newer) "Phase 2," and the Grand Sequoia closely matches the composite asphalt shingles used to replace cedar shakes on our six older "Phase 1 " units in 2004, though the Grand Sequoia is actually a higher "architectural" grade. At Grouse Glen's August 25 annual meeting of members (owners of our I 1 units), Ms. St. Charles chose not to be present in person, by phone or by proxy, and she did not submit any comments or wishes about what materials should be used for the re- roofing of Phase 2. The re- roofing project was the most important agenda item for the annual meeting, next to the mandatory election of directors. Prior to the annual meeting, starting in early July, a Grouse Glen member named Dean Ericson had conducted an exhaustive examination of many roofing materials and contractors, and had sent out several packages to all owners with brochures from several manufacturers and memos and spreadsheets detailing his findings and recommendations. Dean is a Dartmouth engineering graduate with an MBA from MIT, and spent most of his career in the cable TV business performing complex analyses and recommendations on major strategic marketing decisions. He is on the Board of Directors of the Colorado Ski and Snowboarding Museum headquartered in the Vail Transportation Center. Dean and his wife Judy and my wife and I are part owners of a unit in Phase 1, and I asked him to run the roofing project when no other owners, including Ms. St. Charles, expressed a willingness to do so. At the annual meeting, Dean led a discussion of the options available, including showing actual samples of composite asphalt, cement tile, and DaVinci polymer shingles. Following Dean's presentation and after questions and discussion, in two preference polls the ten unit members represented at the meeting unanimously supported the Board's recommended five -unit roofing plan 10 -0, and supported the choice of Grand Sequoia asphalt shingles 9 -1. The one dissenting owner of quadplex Unit 8 expressed a desire to have DaVinci polymer shingles, which would have resulted in significantly greater expense and been a significant departure in appearance and cost from the 2004 decision to replace Phase I's cedar shake roofs with asphalt shingles. The new Grouse Glen Board was elected by a vote of 9 -0 after the Unit 8 owner ended her teleconference. The unanimous vote included the other three of the five units in Phase 2, and all three have expressed a very strong preference for Grand Sequoia asphalt shingles. By mid - September, the new Board had:. 1. issued a special assessment sufficient to pay for the full five -unit roofing project, and specifically noted as part of that special assessment process that Unit 8 would be completed first and before snow season. 2. signed a contract with TNT Specialty Constructors to do all five roofs and requested that work start on Unit 8 first. 3. and as you are aware, working with TNT, signed all necessary permit forms and received all necessary permits. On September 18, Ms. St. Charles, and the owner from Unit 8 that preferred DaVinci polymer, served an injunction lawsuit on Grouse Glen. For the time being, the lawsuit is preventing our moving forward on the re- roofing of the quadplex, which includes Unit 8. However, the lawsuit does not affect stand -alone Unit 7, and the Board proceeded to have TNT reroof that unit, which was completed last week. In one of the messages you forwarded, Mr. R.uther stated, " But for the objection, this project may have already been completed." That statement is demonstrably true for Unit 8, which would have been started first instead of Unit 7, and the other four units would have been completed this fall, according to our contractor, who notified us TNT had capacity to do all five this roofing season. Much is being made of alleged continuing leaks into Unit 8. On September 30 while I was at a two -day conference, Unit 8's owner called me about using cedar shakes on her unit, and during that call made an oblique reference to a continuing leak. This was a complete surprise because the Unit 8 roof had been repaired this summer by the Turner Morris company and she has never reported that the repairs had failed. Therefore, on October 2, the morning after my conference, I emailed the Unit 8 owner and specifically requested urgent information on the location of any leak and whether the Association could gain access to her unit to investigate and repair any leak. I noted that TNT was readily available for investigation and repair. She immediately replied that her children were sick and she would get back to me. To date, the Unit 8 owner has not replied, all the while Ms. St. Charles has been writing numerous messages to the Town of Vail about alleged leaks into Unit 8 without once informing anyone on the Grouse Glen Board. Ms. St. Charles in one of the forwarded messages stated that our litigation counsel has been informed of the results of a structural engineer's inspection Monday, but our counsel has only received the comments of Ms. St. Charles and a May 2012 pre - purchase engineer's report on Unit 8 having nothing to do with roof leaks. Shortly after the 2012 purchase of Unit 8, its buyer, Ms. Reven Wright, told me that a contractor had easily fixed the structural deck support columns described in the May 2012 report. She has not reported any subsequent "hinging" or other structural issues. I also note that the alleged leaks are from 21 -year old chimney flashings that were to be replaced as part of the roofing project. No leaks have ever been reported through the temporary patch over Unit 8, and TNT informs us that the patch appears completely watertight and capable of remaining so for two or more years. Putting temporary cedar shakes on the patch would do nothing for the alleged flashing leaks. A primary purpose of the roofing project is to get a complete new roofing system, including flashings and "chimney crickets," over the five units, not piecemeal repairs. This appeal and message writing by Ms. St. Charles without notifying the Grouse Glen Board - -or its counsel- - brings me to a final point and request. Grouse Glen is certainly a party in interest in whatever is involved with the roofing of its units, and we really appreciate your advising us of it, which Ms. St. Charles has not. I draw inferences from her deliberate failure. I was hoping that the Town had the authority to require her to copy us on all communications with the Town affecting the interests of Grouse Glen. I will understand if the Town does not have that power. In any event, we would appreciate someone continuing to forward to us any of her communications affecting Grouse Glen. I was not sure who should be copied on this message. You are free to forward it to anyone that might benefit, including Ms. St. Charles. Thank you so much for the even - handedness, professionalism and restraint which you and the Town have shown. And I am sorry that our small 11 -unit Association can be the source of so much contention. As one President said, "I feel your pain!" Wyatt McCailie President & Director Grouse Glen at Vail Condominium Association Wyatt McCallie wyatt.mccallie@mail.com home: 303 759 2275 mobile: 303 882 3326 On Oct 16, 2013 6:02 PM, "Warren Campbell" <WCainpbell cc,vail ov.com> wrote: in order to keep you in the loop. An appeal was filed by Ms. St. Charles and the following conversation has been occurring. From: Wendy St. Charles [mailto:wstcharles@icloud.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:21 PM To: George Ruther Cc: Warren Campbell; Matt Mire Contact; Stan Zemler; Andy Daly; Greg Moffet; Kerry Donovan; Kevin Foley; Ludwig Kurz; Margaret Rogers; Pam Brandmeyer; Susie Tjossem Subject: Re: Grouse Glen Roof Appeal Dear George - I have no idea from where you are receiving your information, but it is inaccurate. The issue is the repair of the roof. The leaking is apparent even from a layman's observation. Please come look at it if you question that at any level. Had I known what you were thinking we could have resolved that impediment to pulling a repair permit very quickly. Best, Wendy Wendy St. Chari+es wstchari es(&.i clou d. com 303- 947 -4514 On Oct 16, 2013, at 12:05 PM, George Ruther <GRuther@vai1gov.com> wrote: Wendy- We both know that the issue is not the repair of the roof. In fact, the Community Development Department issued a building permit to the Association the same day in which it was applied for (9/17). The issue is the Association's permit proposes to replace wood shake shingles with asphalt shingles and you and /or your client object to the change in roofing material. But for the objection, this project may have already been completed. This issue remains a dispute by and between the private parties and should not involve the Town. As you are aware, the appeal you filed of the staff approval has been set for a public hearing with the Design Review Board on November 6th. The 6x" is the soonest the appeal can be heard given the public notification process required. As you are further aware, pending the decision of the DRB on the 6th , a subsequent appeal can then be filed of the DRB's decision, This review process, which started with a same day over the counter staff approval of a reroof application, has the potential to drag on for nearly two more months if it is allowed to do so. I am sorry you disagree with your Association's decision to change the roof material. The Town of Vail does not have a role in the decision making process of your Association. As you know, wood shake roof materials are prohibited in the Town as they contribute to an increased fire hazard in the urban /wildland interface, This fact is well documented. The material proposed by the Association fully complies with the adopted guidelines and standards. This issue has consumed an inordinate and excessive amount of staff time over the last five weeks. At this point, your appeal is being processed for a hearing with the DRB. We are moving forward as quickly as allowed given statutory notice requirements. We too want to see the reroof project completed. See you on the 6 1'. Regards, 4 George Ruther, AICP Director Community Development <image002.Jpg' 97n 479.2145 970.376.2675 cell www.vailgov.com www.twitter.com/vai Igov From: Wendy 5t. Charles [mailto:wstcharles @ icloud.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 11 :11 AM To: George Ruther Cc: Warren Campbell; Matt Mire Contact; Stan Zemler, Margaret Rogers; Council Dist List Subject: Re: Grouse Glen Roof Appeal George I believe the permit you refer to was issued to the association for replacement of roofs, which is not being undertaken. My request is for an immediate repair that is needed to protect an owner's property. The shingles were taken off of the Wrights` roof in January of last year, with the understanding that the repair would be completed. It is now the end of October. The town should be insisting on the roof repair being completed immediately, as well. The owner is trying to complete the repair at the owner's cost. The town has refused to issue a permit for the repair. The roof replacement is the matter on appeal. Repairs needed to protect property cannot be precluded while an appeal is pending. Best, Wendy Wendy St. Charles wstcharlesLd icloudxom 303- 947 -4514 On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:51 AM, George Ruther <GRuther@vailgov.com> wrote: Good Morning Wendy- As you are aware, an over the counter building permit application (same day permit) has been reviewed and approved for the proposed reroofing project at the Grouse Glen Condominiums. The permit is ready for pick up and has been for quite some time now. The roofing project work could have begun as soon as the permit was picked up. Of course, now that an appeal of the staff approval has been filed all work on the project must be stopped until a decision on the appeal is reached. Thanks, George Ruther, AICP Director Community Development <imageOOI.jpg> 970.479.2145 970.376.2675 cell www.vailgov.com www.twitter.com vail ov From: Wendy St.. Charles [mailto:wstcharles icloud.corml Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:34 AM To: George Ruther Cc: Warren Campbell; Matt Mire Contact; Stan Zemler; Margaret Rogers Subject: Re: Grouse Glen Roof Appeal Good Morning George, Thank you for yours below. I do not believe that the properties listed below (other than Grouse Glen HOA) received any form of notice of the action taken and thus question whether they would have a legal right to object to its appeal. Nonetheless, I will bring Warren the five additional stamped envelopes. Of more immediate concern, a structural engineer accompanied me to inspect the Grouse Glen town homes in brief on Monday. Grouse Glen HOA's counsel in the litigation was notified of the outcome. Three of the four town homes, including mine, evidence leaking around the chimney flashing, with the Wrights' unit being the worst, with bulging stucco on the westerly elevation. Moreover, a structural support for the Wrights' unit is hinging and has been in need of repair since June 2012, with the Grouse Glen HOA claiming no responsibility for the repair and also claiming no responsibility for remediating mold in the crawl space under the Wrights' unit. The town has refused to issue the Wrights a permit to complete the repair of their roof, because the HOA will not sign off without dismissal of the litigation. Property owners in Vail are thus being relegated to standby while their property deteriorates and is damaged. 1 do not believe the town or its residents are well served in denying an owner the right to protect their property. I believe, George, if you lived in Vail and were placed in a similar situation immediate action would be taken to issue you a permit to protect the roof over your property or the town council would tape immediate action, if needed, to change an obviously broken policy that harms residents and their property and gives rise to liability to the town for no sound reason. This email serves as a further request for the town to issue a building permit immediately for the Wrights (Unit 8) to reinstall shingles removed from the roof of their roof last January and to have whatever other roofs repairs are needed, at the owners' expense, to prevent damage to the interior of the owners' units until the litigation is resolved. i ask you and Matt to please get the town council involved if necessary to allow immediate repairs to proceed. Best, Wendy Wendy St. Charles wstc:harIes[IicIoud.c orn 303 - 9474514 On Oct 16, 2013, at 9.32 AM, George Ruther <GRutheravailgov.com3 wrote; Good Morning Wendy- I want to make certain there is no misunderstanding as to what is required and when it is needed. At this time we have determined that your application for the appeal is incomplete. It has been determined to be incomplete as you failed to provide proper adjacent property owner notice and self- addressed stamped envelopes as required. We are giving you until 4 :00 pm today to rectify the deficiencies in the application. If the deficiencies are not rectified the application will be returned to you as incomplete. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions as to what is required. Regards, George Ruther, AICP Director Community Development <image002.jpg> 970.479.2145 970.376.2675 cell www.vailgov.com www.twitter.com/vaiIgo e From: Warren Campbell Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:18 AM To: 'Wendy St. Charles' Cc: George Ruther Subject: Grouse Glen Roof Appeal Ms. St. Charles, I am preparing the notice for the appeal of an administrative action to be heard on November 6, 2013, by the Design Review Board, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -3A, Appeals, Vail Town Code. In preparing the notice it appears the adjacent property envelopes you have provided are not in compliance with Section 12- 3- 3B(3), Appeal of Administrative Action, Vail Town Code. It appears you have only provided envelopes for the 4 units in your building. It appears that you have not included an envelope for each of the following properties which includes the affect property and adjacent properties. The following are the properties I have found to be missing. 1) Grouse Glen HOA (property that is the subject of the appeal) 2) Crossview at Vail HOA to the east and south 3) 1483 Aspen Grove Lane to the north PJ 4) 1487 Ruffehr Creek Road to the north 5) The Valley Condos HOA to the west and south I need these properties included on the list of adjacent properties to be notified and a stamped addressed envelope for each submitted to the Community Development Department office by 4:00 pm today in order for your application to be complete. If these envelopes are not received by 4:00 pm today, October 16, 2013, your application with be found to be incomplete. Sincerely, Warren Campbell 10 NAE0 Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road West TOWN OF nVAIL eft_rvL- 1—% Hail, CO 81657 Community Development <S {� Tel: 970479-2128 Department AA r�C�L}' www.vailgov.com �C Development Review Coordinator RE -ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION (This permit is applicable to one and two family dwelling units, multifamily buildings) (Permit fee = standard building fees and de ign review fee) Project lnforma on C-o t-doo voil rt ti k-A 111* 5 3aC 11-rl d N Owner Name: a V 31c 'Lt =N A-r V tot%, Type of Building: Multifamily () One Family ( 1 Two Family (Duplex) { ) Parcel #: �`� (For Parcel 9, contact Eagle County Assessors Office at (970-321466W or visa wwrv.eaglecounty . usipatie) L v� y ITS RA w, I I Project Street Address- IM l - -� - - (Number) (Street) Contractor Information (Suite #) Business Name: N 1- 5 ! "_C [ rt L a Irv-5-rPVC rof2,5 Business Address: P X ( 15;O� City -f- A & [-C State: � Zip: e i Contact Name: - c Nt 01--_C44 Contact Phone: "7"'0 n-3 Z a- l Ca e 3 Contact E -Mail: °C-hl T- 5 - C ('� l4crr A t L. cczA Joint Property Owner Written Approval Letter (duplex or multi - family HOA) Two (2) plan sets indicating: • Site plan showing location of balconies, decks, stair- ways, sidewalks, pedestrian and vehicular exits from the building and utility meters • Roof plan showing pitch and slope • Snow retention method and location. Multi - family building snow retention is required to be designed, signed and seated by a licensed engineer 0 If heat tape is to be used as snow retention, load cal- culations must be provided • Material type (i.e, Composite Shingles Class A) and color • Full view roof photos of the entire building & Note: Roofs with a horizontal dimension less than 48" are exempted frorn snow retention Applicant Information (fill in if different from contractor) Detailed Scope and Location of Work:�� Applicant Name Applicant Phone. Applicant E -Mail: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. i agree to damply with the information and plot plan. to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review ap- proved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town pli ble thereto. , Owner /Owner's Representative Signa ure Required (typed or digital signature) ( Checking this box indicates you are electronically signing this application and agree to the above statement. For Office Use Only Fee. Paid' Received From: Cash Check CC: Visa f MC Last 4 CC # _ Auth #; (use additional sheet if necessary) Valuation of Work Included Plans included Work Electrical (.._)Yes )N,_., )No Building , )Yes �N4�) (.)No Va lue of all work being ormed. o �'ry (value based O.'1 IBC SeC:tiOn 109.3 & tRC Swion Tos.3) � I ©/ q G) Electrical Square Footage Date Received: IE C IE 0 V C SEP 13 209 TOWN OF VAIL Project #. Building Permit #: or C. 13 Lot #: ___,_ Black #- Subdivision vlli4eaAmfir 13 -Jan 16 rnwx of va' ii1 .JOINT PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER The applicant must submit written joint property owner approval for applications affecting shared ownership properties such as duplex, condominium, and multi- tenant buildings. This form, or similar written correspondence, must be com- pleted by the adjoining duplex unit owner or the authorized agent of the home owner's association in the case of a con- dominium or mutti- tenant C�building, All completed forms must be submitted with the applicants completed application. I. (print Homey !J' "fChi�! Ac =_ �' authority of the association of property located at i 51 (,1`1� 14o- `7 - 74- approval Of the plans dated provide this letter as written � 1 t �t h -� =sib. �' .J -w- rwhiclT have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvements to be completed at the address not- ed above. I understand that the proposed improvements include: +° "t .J ( - rv�tp+J]� I understand that modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations, and that it is the sole responsibility of the applicant to keep the joint property owner apprised of any changes and ensure that the changes are acceptable and appropriate. Submittal of an application results in the applicant agreeing to this statement. Signature Print Dame f Date "Quality You Can Trust Since 1886 ... From North America's Largest Roofing Manufacturer" September 18, 2013 Subject. Grand Sequoia@ To 'Whom It May Concern Technical Services 1361 Alps Road, Bldg. 11 -1 Wayne, NJ 074'70 Phone: 1 -800- 766 -3411, option I This is to confirm that the GAF Grand Sequoia@ shingles manufactured in Fontana, CA meet or exceed 300 Ibs per square. If you have any further questions, please contact us at 800 -766- 3411. Sincerely, FE, 1 Jamie Duvall GAF Contractor Services Shingle weights Grand Sequoia 091813 jdl Project; Grouse Glen Re -Roof Units 7,8,9,10 & 11 Re -roof specifications; • New shingles shall be "Grand Sequoia "; Manufacture; GAF, (color - "Cedar ") • Remove & dispose of existing cedar shakes • Provide self- adhering, sbs mod. Bit. , ( "ice & water shield "), membrane - Carlisle WIP300 from eave edge, to a point 72" up slope of roof - Carlisle WIP100 on balance of roof substrate, for 100% net coverage of goof substrate wI I &W membrane. • Provide for continuous ridge vent system • Pre - finished "large face: style `D' drip edge at all rake & eave edges Custom fabricated "peak" flashing where applicable (5) custom fabricated pre - finished metal crickets at chimney chases. • Valley metal where applicable • New plumbing vent pipe flashings, ( "jacks ") • Snow retention as per TOV /Manufacture specs. Rocky Mtn. Snow Guards - 9" SnowTrapper Snow Guards color; Dark Bronze m na. • r�r ,• Vii. i M OA N . �. . . m. � %+ COO .� �` ,„ '� >,:. � yy,,� � .N r 4 ^T <�r,;p ,�.. w "' { `� -�� �' :. -_ � �.� �1 S�r FP�T I# \P � .v, . ;� * \ ¥ \J-J. \ ` # . � r. r __ 611', 7.41 a� ;L!k. f-�- N. il6MM== � J • ' 4.1 i Y - • e: yl, f- n JL 11 ta" .�Aro .' *rr' �3 je .rs.. , 6 v s i (ft E � i f A t ♦ t� ♦ • �J i A i A k ♦ ♦ ♦ • A i 4 • ♦ < tj as designed /specused per ��p -- < ' '` ROCKY MOUNTAIN SNOW GUARDS, INC. 2055 S. RARITAN ST. DENVER, CO. 80223' PROJECT; GROUSE GLEN CONDOMINIUMS UNIT #'S 7,8,9,10 & 11 1470 -72- 7476 -78 BUFFEHR GREEK ROAD, VAIL, CO. DESIGN CRITERIA: • ASPHALT COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFS • 6 IN 12 COMMON PITCH • VAIL, COLORADO RECOMMENDED LAYOUT: - 3 ROW PATTERN AT ALL AFFECTED EAVES - .SNOW GUARDS STAGGERED 24" HORIZONTALLY X 12" VERTICALLY IN ALL 3 ROWS NEw SPECIALTY ARCHnECTURAL /D/ME'NSI ©NAL ASPHALT COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING GAF "GRAND SEQUOIA" COLOR; "CEDAR" RE -ROOF SPECIFICATIONS" • REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXISTING CEDAR SHAKES • PROVIDE SELF-ADHERING, SBS MOD. BIT. , ( "ICE & WATER SHIELD "), MEMBRANE ---- CARLISLE WIP300 FROM EAVE EDGE, TO A POINT 72" UP SLOPE OF ROOF •- CARLISLE WIP 100 ON BALANCE OF ROOF SUBSTRATE, FOR 10010 NET COVERAGE OF ROOF SUBSTRATE Wf I &W MEMBRANE. • PROVIDE FOR CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT SYSTEM •° PRE-FINISHED "LARGE FACE: STYLE `D' DRIP EDGE AT ALL RAKE & EAVE EDGES • CUSTOM FABRICATED "PEAK" FLASHING WHERE APPLICABLE • (5) CUSTOM FABRICATEDPREFINISHED METAL CRICKETS AT CHIMNEY CHASES. • VALLEY METAL WHERE APPLICABLE • NEW `PLUMBING VENT PIPE FLASHINGS, ( "JACKS ") • SNOW RETENTION AS PER TOWMANUFACTURE SPECS. i AP OWN t • t • •+ • 4 , • ii li r M f } 0 a` w • w rsu•i 0 • i SIN I I MIN l mow', Ming � MINN, 0�Y Mower ii oil Mimi mosm lip Son! M■ ter,, r■■ son IN son on 'knAl 0 10 i \ `�� � � � •�`�, � `,~ate —•• 7 The many layers of a GrandSequoie Slingre 4 GRANULES f ASPHALT 4 CORE 'rt ASPHALT # GRANULES 4 ASPHALT 4 CORE 4 ASPHALT 4 ADHESIVE Diamond GeGranules... Multi.- faceted design and light - reflective construction add dimension and depth to the shingle UV Blacker (Granules)... Protects against damaging sunlight which improves the durability and extends the life of the shingle Color Lock - Ceramic firing (Granules)... Maintains the true color of the shingle longer Dura Grip "A,dhesive... Locks the Shingles in place on the roof, gripping tight even in strong gale - force winds MGrading System Asphalt },., est quality asphalt improves weathering in harsh conditions AEcroWeave Core— Offers a superior strength foundation that resists cracking and splitting FiberTeW Components (Core).,. Incorporates fibers that are non - combustible, providing a UL Class A fire rating ��4w ice, -�,� *��``'�.,��`�'�_ �1 or `�_, `�, � "� .art . - -�.. � `• w 4 �.� \ �"., ,ter sir mow" - W, -.,�. ^. `�.? s �w�. ►. `, �" y ' ,Y--Wow -w ice"''., .., l ...... `-� .._:,�.. •���.. .ate .\� vw. awl The many layers of a GrandSequoie Slingre 4 GRANULES f ASPHALT 4 CORE 'rt ASPHALT # GRANULES 4 ASPHALT 4 CORE 4 ASPHALT 4 ADHESIVE Diamond GeGranules... Multi.- faceted design and light - reflective construction add dimension and depth to the shingle UV Blacker (Granules)... Protects against damaging sunlight which improves the durability and extends the life of the shingle Color Lock - Ceramic firing (Granules)... Maintains the true color of the shingle longer Dura Grip "A,dhesive... Locks the Shingles in place on the roof, gripping tight even in strong gale - force winds MGrading System Asphalt },., est quality asphalt improves weathering in harsh conditions AEcroWeave Core— Offers a superior strength foundation that resists cracking and splitting FiberTeW Components (Core).,. Incorporates fibers that are non - combustible, providing a UL Class A fire rating "The Perfect Investment For Fine Homes And Properties" for HOMEOWNERS Fanws6c.Appearana.. Patented, extra -large shingle with unique design helps create a dramatic visual impact for prestigious homes and properties Safes:,. Class A fire and wind ratings front. Underwriters Laboratories — the highest ratings possible Z P. Su er hweight design and extra strong Micro Weave' Core provide outstanding performance in all climates Pe am Oft ink. Lifeti me ltd. transferable warranty with Smart Choice' Protection for the first ten years (non- prorated material and installation coverage )** i' I for PROFESSIONALS Qual m imftwian... Large I7 "x 40" size saves labor, allowing you to offer superior value and greater homeowner satisfaction Mom RefernVs .. People will notice! Iez Chance Of GAU- Back.. Triple self -seal design reduces the chance of shingle blow -off (shingles warranted to withstand winds up to 110 mph*') 1 � i SPECIFICATIONS StaXIn Ply.. Dura Grip' Grand Sequoia" Shingles adhesive seals each shingle • Lifetime Ltd. Warranty tightly and reduces risk of • 10 Year Smart Choice' Protection + 110 mph Ltd. Wind Warranty, shingle blow -off + Fiberglass Asphalt Shingle PeiCt Finishing T� .. • Class A rating from UL For the best look, use • Passes UL 997110 mph Wind Test Timbertex® Distinctive + CSA A123.5 -98 Ridge Cap shingles. • ASTM D3018 Type 1 (In the West, use high • ASTM D3161 Type 1 ""* profile Ridglass'O * ASTM D3462 + ASTM D7158, Class H Ridge Cap shingles; + Dade County Approved Sequoia' /Canyon" Ridge * Approx. 72 Pieces/Sq. Cap shingles are also a • Approx, 5 BundlesrA. good choice.) • Approx. 360 Nails/Sq. * 5" Exposure * 6 Sgs./Pal let LA • 120 Sqs- fFruck S { 20 Pallets/Truck d`J 7 F ,fir Sequoia f Carryon" T rmhet'tee Ridge Cap Shingles Starter Strip Shingles (All regions except West) * Product Size 13'11" x 40" • StainGuarcr Protection * 18 Starter Sheets Per Bundle • Listed Class A Fire —UL 790 • 4 Nails Per Piece (Approx.) • Dade County Approved Sequoias /Canyon" + Passes UL 907 Wind Test Ridge Cap Shingles * ASTM D3462R`' 72 Pieces/Bundle * 20 Linear Ft. of Coverage Per Bundle • 33.75 Linear Feet/Bundle • 30 Pieces/Bundle + 2 Nails Per Piece (Approx.) * 2 Nails Per Piece {Approx.) + 5' /=" Exposure + 8" Exposure • Approx. l0" Width * 5 Bundles Per 100 Linear Ft. of Coverage Ridglass Ridge Cap Shingles 110 mph warranty requires special installation, (Western region only) see Itd. warranty for details. + 8" Exposure See IN. warranty for complete coverage and * 48 Pieces /Box restrictions. + Coverage: 31 Linear Feet/Box This product is manufactured to meet or exceed ASTM 43462: values from subsequent testing * Available In 8" and may vary depending on storage conditions 10" widths * 2 Nails /Piece (Approx.) f •� * Approx. 160 Pieces Per 100 Linear Ft. of Coverage f y ti r � f w 41fAJIM 1' 1 L Leak Barrier Weather Watch "' and StormGuardg provide exceptional protection against leaks caused by roof settling and extreme weather. Ideal upgrade at all vulnerable areas (including at the eaves in the ,North*). mart Choice``, 60F SYSTEM SOLUTION "Your Best And Safest Choice... Quality You Can Trust Since 1886►„ Roof Deck Protection "Breathable " Deck- Armor' allows moisture to escape from your attic while providing an exceptionally strong layer of protection against wind - driven rain. It also lays flatter for a better - looking roof. Shingle -Mate and Leatherback*- (available regionally) also provide great protection for your roof. Quality Shingles Choosing the right shingle can increase the value of your home. GAF -Elk offers you many great shingle choices, including Timberline the 91- selling architectural shingles in Worth America. Effective Attic Ventilation Cobra and Master Flow," vents help remove excess heat and moisture from your attic that can raise your energy bills, cause premature peeling of paint and wallpaper, and even affect your health. Distinctive 'Ridge Cap Shingles Similar to the way that a distinctive frame enhances a painting, Timbertex`- and Ridglassr can enhance the beauty and value of your home —while guarding against leaks at the hips and ridges. Reliable Low -Slope Membranes Liberty"and Freedom' commercial grade self adhering roofing systems are exceptionally dependable) l-hey're safer too, because no open torches or hot asphalt are used Pre -Cut Starter Roof Accessory Strip Shingles Paint WeatherBlocker" and Pro - Start" ShingleMatch" premium roof pre -cut starter strip shingles provide accessory paint is a great option an upgrade that can save time, to help you "hide" unsightly roof eliminate waste, and reduce the accessories by making them blend risk of blow -off by tightly locking in with the color of your shingles... your first course of shingles in place, for a better - looking finished roof. t )) �o -�, . GAF-Elk is a U.S. -Owned Corporation Premium Skylights HearrenScaW premium skylights add the beauty of natural light to the interior of your home... with quality construction and protection you can trust. Ay1Y'LO �WARR �ia CON3yyFgf f>nood Housekleeprng ?! � P,0 1. ct Ea'Ckl aW R €FIVMW 7€ 9f`'4 ihcGiaF#kSmartC Roof 5oh*hasnamedme prestip us ti!;o-ad NpaSekeepim� 5¢al winch Means 1181 GOO Npusefk Pij stands Gehm6 the preduds in this system (Refer sa Gpaa HauSEkeCpn4 Maga ne foe its consumer prdeON pOiq ) NORTHEAST Sales Office: CENTRAL. Sales Office: SOUTHEAST Sales Office: SOUTHWEST Sales Office: WESTERN Sales Office: international Sales: 717 -856 -8300 630 - 296 -1980 B13- 829 -8880 972- 851 -0500 951 - 360.4200 800- 555 - 1852 ©2007 GAF -Elk Corporation 113107 11361 Alps Road, Wayne, NJ 07470 www.gaf.com 277654 -1107 RESGS100 A 14 1 b­"] 1191 Its] MWI_ e y A fill M1____j1 L. w� f�l UNITS 2,3,4 &5 PROOF PLAN A P P ` YIi, L L) w Ll TOWN OF MAIL y A X-4 — — — ---- -- DATE.49.M 5 M1 • �5�7 A l� � a of c D qzc c j i 1 `'o cx uj V y O O • a w; i c cc r CC 3 i R .s F - _ Z , op , It CM r e + ii OI rIL rim ii { .� ��1 E I, fi1o3'•�t"� t: .. _ [O, Jill wJloc;vw — - - - ujr UNIT 1r, EAST NORTH WEST SOi'H_ - .. - __ .....- .. >._._ -.._ ..._ A _ -- • —.-. -: r � i � � ` t I 1 -__�.. _' --.-- - - -_ ,_- �— _......._- ,-- .. - -.. - .�.._ _ . � _ f ' l7 � i � • -- _ - ® - - ,w+-- _ w.w..-- ..., _.. .... .. , , • Y / f j I { I EJ_3 J . +��..•, w - _ _� - �h l'�Arlc. 7 1 i - 1 1 8/�. r I 0 - - 1 _ - w a ,- 1 ' j , f , > i I , I �! -r 3 !✓r 1-r rz-Y _ _ — r�' �., �fo�'- ' _ � Ir �, , - _ t o - uU - _ ; l }� , _ 23 1 - - :..� u,aC "U . > . _ j { I t i f I ! f I } I } ".7. ; - `�`T0�0I .. p I S 5� 1,-RE / O I ` E►.fTe-' i i !, ; j ;1 I ` j } I ' v , , . ���[e DvErz.MG `f I r' 2 Li T : EAST �,��'.� ►r - NORTH, s , p u � �# y y., rr � + - ✓,111 1��� • i f _ � -y1 A 5�!�� at 12 TrP I jig � /� �3P - - - - - ► '� I��� i i p rl 1 � � ! �"i w I f • � . ';�° ' G� ! �� l>-i�l �� tl y�� 1 \_.I Ir ' �A �• y t it ( z • � � ? � � � I , r , � � � � � - - v � I 1 2 _ � ! f , It ' P � If 1 I { I p• I 1 ( - 1(' f 7r rt I ' FL,�- OL grLIT z �-, ° '�tTE 1Jat".�1 -.�`' . , ' _►,L �►.s�ll.�, t? ' - ` - , r , f � � Q >, . �Y�"bf -•f f _- G L ' r ' _ ' ., , , r ( v _ ' 4, .. rn - - � ....-- ,._ - -.w_ , I • . � ` 7 � I 'iii E S T - 1�4�j/�,I�.�r,V G� j. s o,U T R rELEVATIONS` 1 0 < '' ' , , e - a ' ' ' f , ` _ �. • . l ' ' ` .Y ` � of t /�✓