HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC130012 Ford Park Memo and Attachments 0826130) TOWN OF VAIL ¢
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 26, 2013
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan, an assemblage of the 1985 Ford Park
Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park
Management Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage
Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130012)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
SUMMARY
The purpose of this work session is to allow the applicant, Town of Vail, to
• Review the list of comments we heard at the last hearing;
• Review the proposed Sub -area plan chapter;
• Review the Illustrative Plan chapter; and
• Discuss next steps.
II. RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department requests the Planning and Environmental
Commission listens to the applicant's presentation, asks questions, provide feedback,
and then table this application to the September 9, 2013, public hearing.
rt
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
IN,
TOWN 8/26 PEC Work Session OF ,�Ai)
TODAY'S DISCUSSION
• Follow -up on Goals /Objectives Discussion
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
• Sub -area Plans
• Illustrative Plan
•Next Steps
TOWN OF ffl
_RAU
Follow -up on Goals /Objectives from Aug 12tH
•Encourage /mandate cooperation between park lease holders,
work to eliminate "boundaries"
*Pursue joint -use of buildings /facilities as alternative to new
buildings
•Winter use of park, i.e. Amphitheater
•Use of parking lot for concerts /alternative locations
•Design guidelines — diversity vs. compatibility
•Nature center building and site conditions, programs, operator
•Keep door open for alternative operators /lease holders
*Tennis Center building
•BFAG building
*Master Plan — "visionary" or tied to existing leases?
*Gore Creek Cooridor
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
BRAUN
Follow -up on Goals /Objectives from Aug 12t"
•Need VRD input
•Potential uses at east end of Soccer Field site
*Pool —don't preclude this idea
•Fishing access, experience
*Action steps —more "teeth ", timeframes, mandates
•Encourage "under - development" of park
*Compatibility of various park uses
*Use of environmentally friendly materials, design, construction
•Re -order Goals #3 and #4
•Move Goal #1 Objectives 1.4 and 1.5 to Goal #2
•Make decisions based on beneficial outcomes for community, not
just leaseholder
*Incorporate into Goals /Objectives - opportunity for joint -use of
buildings, avoid duplication of facilities
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
BRAUN
Im
za
2013 Plan -Sub -areas
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
4,N
8/26 PEC Work Session TOWN OF IN,
2013 Plan -Sub -areas
Gore Greek
Preservation
--
�'��• Gore Creek ''\ iAdive Rematian Pdrking.J Trdrtsif
... Preservation ,
Alpine
1. Lower Gardett�
Commons Preservation
Creek
Preservation .r'Commons �
Arnphitheater r_ •-' �_
s.-
Soccer Feld
2013 Gerald R. Ford Pork Master Plan
• 7 Sub -areas
• "Role" of each in context of Park
• Relationship to previous master plan goals
• Relationship to surrounding uses and facilities
• Future potential improvements
• Other considerations
J*. 2013
rFrb N Molt
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
.oW134R� ;Ll ;N
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OFar5
W
Parking /Transit Sub -area
y
�R ftmmw a i M
j Transit: �-
Considerations /Potential I mgrovements
•Sub -area plays key role in how the Park "works ",
• "No net loss" of parking,
*Continue special events /concerts in parking lot,
•Monument -type entry features at the two pedestrian portals from the parking lot into the
Park,
•Traffic control devices (gates or other means) at the east and west ends of Betty Ford
Way, and
•Acknowledge idea of structured parking
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
3 FZA[_I N
Active Recreation Sub -area
Considerations /Potential Improvements
•Recent improvements address active recreation needs for foreseeable future,
•Monument -type entry features at west end and at two pedestrian portals from the
parking lot into the Park,
•Enhanced landscape buffer around the perimeter of the sub area,
•2009 Transportation Plan idea — round -about at west end of Ford Park,
•Potential to improve pedestrian flow through Tennis Center,
•Potential replacement /renovation of Tennis Center Building,
•Alternative location for BFAG Education Center
*Acknowledge idea of structured parking below Tennis Center
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session ''o' i3411'N
TOWN OF VA15
Cr
Lower
Commons
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAI
Lower Commons Sub -area
Considerations /Potential Improvements
*No new buildings within Sub -Area,
•Maintain basic "footprint" of playground
area,
•Replace restroom facilities at the
children's playground,
•Continue "un- programmed" use of open
turf area,
*Limit use of open turf area for special
events, better manage these events,
*Maintain AIPP use along Creek, and
Upgrade Betty Ford Way.
V B_F?�;LI;N
!�ar
R2
Amphitheater Sub -area
Considerations /Potential Improvements
•Town /VVF to continue efforts to
minimize vehicle trips to Amphitheater
and manage delivery vehicles,
*Limit new uses /expansions that would
appreciably increase vehicle trips into
Lower Bench,
*Development of a "Public Plaza" at the
entry to the Amphitheater,
*Stream bank restoration south of
Amphitheater, east of bridge, and
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session 3_tu'N
TOWN OF Vary
N
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAI
__4.0
Alpine Garden Sub -area
Considerations /Potential
Improvements
*Development of an alpine garden
educational center.
. ,N
ft
Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area
Considerations /Potential Improvements
•No new buildings within sub -area,
• "Low- impact" uses /improvements (soft surface trails, stream bank stabilization) may be
permitted,
•Utilities, drainage, creek crossings only if no practical alternative is available,
•Restore character of Nature Center building, enhance use of facility,
•Enhancement /restoration of vegetation along corridor,
*Seating, art installations along "western" creek corridor /Vail Village connector, and
•Removal /reduction of parking at Nature Center.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
�_F?�;LI;N
Soccer Field Sub -area
e
Soccer
Feld
Considerations
•Maintain active recreation uses,
*Expansion of sand volleyball courts, and
•Alternative location for BFAG Education Center.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
_RAU
2013 Plan — Illustrative Plan
d:i3 LK- 14.1 (I n F-)r7 V11 5 P, ;70 : - - A -0 P.-,n
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
rw u�
3
• General description of improvements
• Design and operational parameters /considerations
• Improvements not depicted may be proposed
No assurance of if /when improvements will be initiated
TOWN OF VAI
�r wa
2013 Plan — Illustrative Plan
4, 3;
20 ] Crurolrl II Ford Park Pdaatiier Plan - IlluirraiFrte PRm
rte- d& `
•- 110 .
1` ,-
Potential Improvements
#1 — Gore Creek Corridor Restoration
#2 — Gore Creek Village Connector
#3 - Entry Monumentation at Park's pedestrian entries
#4 — Betty Ford Alpine Garden Educational Center
#5 — Nature Center
#6 - Ford Amphitheater Entry Upgrade and Public Plaza
#7 — Children's Playground Restrooms
#8 — Betty Ford Way
#9 — Betty Ford Way Traffic Control
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
�, -134R� ;LI ;N
8/26 PEC Work Session TOWN OF ,�Ai5
9--Iln
21013 G-erocd k Fora tcpk Mailer flan ? MuOrgRa.,
#1 Gore Creek Corridor Restoration
w,,�
PR
• Complete detailed assessment of creek corridor to determine nature, extent of
restoration
• Prepare restoration plan
• Implement
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
.�.. ;
W B_F?�;LI;N
W.- f'
�f �1
&I*- i
#2 Gore Creek Village Connector
• Enhance walking experience along creek corridor,
• Enhancements may include art installations, seating areas, overlooks
• Improvements to avoid 100 -year flood plain, wetlands, riparian areas.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session iOwru OFai)
i. B_F?�;LI;N
#3 Entry Monumentation at Park's Pedestrian Entries
1
24 F3 Gcmald R Fo d Pr-k 1— HVro -4-0- i -
� .�
IMP ow
ran �'rie
• Announce "arrival" to park at pedestrian entries
• Design alternatives for "arrivals" include landscaping, signage, bollards, monuments,
archways and other design features
• Design of improvements may vary, but should share common design vocabulary.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session i3F?�;l .IN,
TOWN OF VAI
alba -
#4 Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center
• Building of not more than 3,000 square feet,
• Design that is "low- scale" in appearance, does not visually dominate the surrounding area / "loom" over WBFW.
• Provide appropriate horizontal separation from West Betty Ford Way to not diminish the quality of the
walkway.
• Provide adequate clearances from existing utility lines and drainage improvements, when necessary relocate,
• Ability to construct the project in a manner that does not adversely impact other facilities or uses in the Park.
• Establish viable management plan to prevent vehicular access to the building (employees, service vehicles,
deliveries, etc.),
• Demonstrate how emergency vehicles will access the building, and
• Identify the anticipated parking demand from the building and demonstrate how that will be addressed.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session i3F?�;l .IN,
TOWN OF VAIL
0
#5 Nature Center
awl/ i
,_mss ��•�_
Assess building to determine how to restore architectural integrity
Reclaim informal parking areas, take steps to limit vehicular access
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
r
1
Ar4wB U,N
#6 Ford Amphitheater Entry /Public Plaza
t
Parameters and criteria to be considered:
-Design that facilitates truck turning movements to provide loading /delivery to Amphitheater,
*Re- locate mature trees proximate to amphitheater
-Plaza available to for public gatherings /events and open and accessible to the public when not
being used for functions
*Any structures /roof elements should harmonize with the Amphitheater, not dominate surrounding
area, conform to the Ford Park Design Criteria,
-Any fencing to be subtle and visually unobtrusive,
Viable plan for managing vehicles, deliveries, etc. to minimize vehicle trips to Lower Bench.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
oqp-
8/26 PEC Work Session I °N
ir�w�u OF �ar�
#7 Children's Playground Restrooms
-, �, ,� _ ,
.�y
\ `'r "+*
Design and Operational Considerations
Building to be one -level and sized no larger than necessary to meet the needs of park
users,
•No other uses should be incorporated into this building.
*The location of the bathroom may be changed, but should remain within the general
"footprint" of the playground area.
•The building should not encroach on the adjacent open turf area.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session N
iOw�u OF �VAI ) ,,
#8 Betty Ford Way
Design and Operational Considerations
*Create a "feature pedestrian corridor" between Covered Bridge and Amphitheater,
Widened to between 11 and 13 feet,
•Replace path surface with finer textured, higher quality pavements such as colored
concrete, or stone or concrete pavers,
*Add seating and lighting along the path,
•Enhance landscaping to provide more interest and color along the route, and
*New way- finding signage.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
V B_F?�;LI;N
#9 Betty Ford Way Traffic Control
Design and Operational Considerations
Install gates, bollards or other improvements at either end of Betty Ford Way as a
means to regulate traffic,
*Establish a system for managing truck use on East Betty Ford Way to prevent two
trucks from utilizing East Betty Ford Way at the same time.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan RAUN
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
Next Steps
TOWN OF ffl
_RAU
July 22 Follow -up
General Comments
Are the planning recommendations for Ford Park consistent with
the Vail Transportation Master Plan?
How does the plan address year round use of Ford Park?
Leaseholders
seem
to
view Park with "turf protection" mentality,
need
to
foster
spirit
of
cooperation.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session �'N
TOWN OF Var)
July 22 Follow -up
General Comments
The proposed design guidelines should address an architectural
style for buildings in Ford Park.
-.
13b1
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
,oW134R� ;LI ;N
8/26 PEC Work Session K�
TOWN OF VAi)
July 22 Follow -up
Existing Uses and Facilities
The physical condition
of the
Nature Center is
far short of Vail's
standards.
How
is this
being
addressed
in
the
master
plan?
Future considerations for restrooms at the Nature Center?
What other uses should be considered for the Nature Center? Is
the VRD the right operator?
,
- ,,_,ki I-
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session N
TOWN OF Vary
July 22 Follow -up
Existing Uses and Facilities
How are concerts and special events managed in Ford Park?
Is the surface parking lot an appropriate venue for special
events?
Can Donovan Park be used for special events, to relieve some of
the pressures placed on Ford Park?
Vi
�7 r
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session u,N
TOWN OF Vary
July 22 Follow -up
Existing Uses and Facilities
Tennis Center Building needs to be updated.
Is the VRD operating their administrative offices consistent with
the conditional use permit approval?
=I
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session N
TOWN OF Vary
July 22 Follow -up
Proposed improvements
Any new buildings belong on the upper bench, close to parking,
accessible by service vehicles, etc.
Fewer buildings in the park is better. Multiple purpose buildings
should be considered rather than individual buildings for individual
users.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session OF Var)
July 22 Follow -up
Proposed improvements
Any new buildings belong on the upper bench, close to parking,
accessible by service vehicles, etc.
Fewer buildings in the park is better. Multiple purpose buildings
should be considered rather than individual buildings for individual
users.
�. i• D€ain
U
�I
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
Y `MA
w
AV
AdWB .,;u,N
July 22 Follow -up
Future improvements and uses
How is the planning addressing other uses and other sporting
activities?
Master Plan should not preclude future uses (like aquatics center,
structured parking, etc).
Think long term — i.e. parking under ball fields, parking under
tennis or tennis over parking.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
3 FZA[_I N
July 22 Follow -up
Future improvements and uses
AIPP programs and installations need further consideration. A
map should be created which illustrated possible and acceptable
locations for future art installations.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl�
Ap4wB .,;u,N
July 22 Follow -up
Future improvements and uses
Great potential for soft surface trail (on both sides of Gore Creek,
below parking lot).
Should a skate park be included in the future planning for Ford
Park?
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
Ar4wB N
Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps
2013 Ford Park Master Plan APWil
8/26 PEC Work Session ~
TOWN OF Vary
Goals and Objectives
Goal #1:
Protect the natural environment along the Gore Creek
corridor and establish appropriate controls and review
procedures to ensure that any new or expanded use or
building within the Park does not adversely affect the
character and quality of the Park or the overall experience of
park users.
•Protect the creek and protect the park from "over- development"
*Existing uses in the park are to remain
*Changes to existing uses will only be considered if there is compelling public
interest or alternative facilities can be provided
*Any changes shall provide recreational, educational, cultural or social benefit
•Uses in Park to be limited
*Master Plan to provide standards /criteria for decision - making
*No new buildings in Gore Creek Corridor
•Preserve /enhance use of School House
•Enhance Nature Center /promote use
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
3 FZA[_I N
Goals and Objectives
Goal #2:
Provide open space, facilities, and programs within Ford Park
to meet the passive and active recreational, educational and
cultural needs of residents and guests of Vail.
*Maintain Gore Creek corridor for "quiet enjoyment" of the Park,
limit uses
*Open Turf area to be predominantly un- programmed space
*Provide for active rec /team sports, concentrate these uses in
Active Rec and Soccer Field Sub Areas
*Conti nue /enhance Park's role in arts, music, dance and
education (support AIPP, BFAG, Nature Center, GRFA)
*Support BFAG efforts to development education center,
Foundations efforts to create Public Plaza
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
BRAUN
Goals and Objectives
Goal #3:
Reduce vehicular intrusions into the interior of the Park and
minimize to the greatest extent feasible the impact of
vehicular activity on users of the Park, particularly on the
passive use areas of the Lower Bench and along pedestrian
walkways.
*No new uses in Lower Bench that would generate increase in
traffic
*Lower Bench uses to limit vehicular traffic, mange truck traffic
*Reduce visitor car traffic to Lower Bench
•Maintain /manage existing on -site parking
•Maintain /enhance transit
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
3 FZA[_I N
Goals and Objectives
Goal #4:
Ensure compatible relationships are maintained between all
venues and all uses within Ford Park
*Coordinate leaseholders scheduling of events to prevent overlap,
over use of Park
•Maintain /enhance buffers between uses
2013 Ford Park Master Plan ozrB
8/26 PEC Work Session 'N
TOWN OF VAI
Goal #5:
Provide a safe, enjoyable
system both within Ford
Village.
Goals and Objectives
and efficient pedestrian circulation
Park and between Ford Park and Vail
*Town-wide directional /informational signage
•Improve pedestrian routes to Park, establish "portals or
gateways"
*Improve internal circulation
•Encourage leaseholders to promote their patrons waking, biking,
busing to Park
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
3 FZA[_I N
Goals and Objectives
Goal #6:
Delineate financial responsibilities among Ford Park
leaseholders and the Town of Vail for both on -going
maintenance /operation and capital improvements.
*Formalize leaseholders cost - sharing of Park
management/operational costs
*Funding of capital improvements
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF VAIL4
3 FZA[_I N
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
Next Steps
Sub -areas
Illustrative Plan
TOWN OF VAI
_RAU
rt
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
IN,
TOWN 8/26 PEC Work Session OF ,�Ai)
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
End of Presentation
TOWN OF ffl
_RAU
Potential Sites
r � �
a � .
1 a�r
a
aka
i
1
013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan
H „
IaKA mF.1
1
iifti4l 05.+21.13
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
vM►-13 4FLI,N
8/26 PEC Work Session K�
TOWN OF VAi)
i- I - h I
0 - (A 0 ,,f--
'c
aR
T a
0
4 n
C
7
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
Part 5 — Ford Park Sub -areas
Am&wB .,;u,N
�4
rt f
_ AL ,.
2013 Ford Park Master Plan
8/26 PEC Work Session
TOWN OF ffl
1997 Management Plan
4 ?,N
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park
Master Plan
An Element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan
' - X
r
i
Planning and Environmental Commission Draft #1
August 12, 2013
ff S$°=•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 1
2. Site Assessment /Existing Conditions 5
3. History of the Park and Previous Planning Efforts 9
4. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps 18
5. Ford Park Sub -Areas 34
6. Illustrative Plan 52
7. Design Criteria 58
8. Park Management 59
9. Appendix 61
Due to the volume of material, the information listed below is provided in a
separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix.
• Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, authorizing the purchase (by condemnation)
of the property known as the Antholz Ranch.
• The Vail Plan, 1974
• Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, naming the property commonly known as the
Antholz Ranch to Gerald R. Ford Park.
• The Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final
Report, 1985
• Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, designating the seven acres around the
Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's
natural history.
• Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988, amending the 1985 Master Plan to add
four tennis courts and to change the location of the aquatics center.
• Ford Park Management Plan, 1997
• Ford Park Management Plan Update, 2012
DRAFT
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Update
August 2013
"Whereas, President Gerald R. Ford has brought to the Town of Vail his
interest and encouragement; has shown through his private life and public
life a commitment to recreation, the environment and places set aside
therefor; and believes that a statement of the community's appreciation
and respect for Gerald R. Ford is appropriate and called for; that the
property commonly referred to as the Anholtz Ranch is hereby named the
Gerald R. Ford Park. "
Resolution approved by Vail Town Council, January 18, 1977
Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION
The Town of Vail acquired the 39 acre Anholtz Ranch in 1973 for the stated purpose of
"improving the quality of life in the community ". Since that time the property has
evolved into one of Vail's most widely used and highly cherished assets. The evolution
of the Anholtz Ranch to what has become Ford Park was originally contemplated by
one of Vail's earliest planning efforts:
"The intended use program is a comprehensive one and eventually the
park will include an impressive number of facilities in addition to extensive
open turf space and the delight of the natural earth forms and mature tree
growth adjacent to Gore Creek ".
The Vail Plan, 1974
The goal of the planning effort is to create a plan that will maintain the essence of what
Ford Park is today and what was envisioned for the Park in 1974 — a combination of
natural open space along the Gore Creek corridor coupled with recreational, social and
cultural uses and facilities that serve the needs of residents and guests of Vail. It is
anticipated that the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan will provide the town and
community with a "guiding document" for the Park for the next ten years. The primary
purpose of this Plan is to define expectations for the use of and future improvements to
the Park and as a resource to assist the Town in decision - making regarding capital
improvements and or any proposed change to the Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 1
Over the past forty years the Town has completed four planning efforts for the Park. To
varying degrees these plans have directly influenced the development of Ford Park and
each has contributed to the role of the Park in how it serves the community. These
previous planning efforts were:
1974 Vail Plan — While the primary purpose of this plan was to address a
broader discussion of Vail's growth and development, it did include a
chapter on recreation and defined at a very broad level the role Ford Park
could play in providing recreational, cultural and community- oriented uses.
1985 Gerald R. Ford Park /Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final
Report — At the time this plan was prepared; ballfields, tennis courts, and
parking had already been developed and construction of an amphitheater
had commenced. The purpose of this plan was to "guide the future
development of the park and establish guidelines for the implementation of
improvements ".
1997 Ford Park Management Plan — This plan was initiated in response to
several development proposals for the Park. The plan was a product of
extensive focus group and public input sessions and in essence served as
an amendment to the 1985 plan.
2012 Update to the Final Report Ford Park Management Plan — This plan
was done to acknowledge new ideas for improvements to the Park that
were initiated when Vail voters approved funding by re- allocating a portion
of the Convention Center Funds to Ford Park.
More detailed summaries of these previous planning efforts are found in Chapter 3 of
this Plan.
While the impetus for these planning efforts was prompted by different factors, each
involved extensive community input, debate, and at times, controversy. These
planning processes revealed the community's intense passion for the Park as town
staff, elected officials and the public worked to find the appropriate level of development
and activity for the Park. The intended outcome of these planning efforts was to
implement the original vision for the Park as outlined in the statement above from the
1974 Vail Plan.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 2
The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan presents a compilation of these previous
planning efforts along with new direction and ideas that have evolved from this latest
planning effort. The primary objectives of this planning effort are to:
• Incorporate key elements of previously completed plans for Ford Park into one
document, specifically those guiding principles that have successfully shaped the
development of the Park from its inception,
• Establish clear expectations for the future land uses, development and
management of the Park,
• Define effective tools for decision - making regarding the future of the Park, and
• Provide a single, comprehensive document to serve as the master plan for Ford
Park.
With the adoption of this 2013 Plan previous plans for Ford Park will be archived and no
longer used as guides for future decision - making or planning for the Park. The 2013
Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan will serve as the Town's sole master plan for the Park.
Elements of this Plan
This Plan includes the following chapters:
1. Introduction
The section provides an introduction to the plan, the purpose of this planning
effort and outlines the major elements of the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan
2. Site Assessment and Existing Conditions
The Ford Park site assessment and summary of existing conditions is based
largely on the site assessment from the 1985 Plan and current observations of
INNU IN
3. History of the Park and Previous Planning Efforts
The 1997 Plan has provided the basis for this history and background of the Park
and the summaries of the four previous planning efforts that have taken place.
Site plans of the Park produced during these planning efforts are to provide a
history and context for how the Park has evolved over the years.
4. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 3
While the 1997 Plan provided a framework for this section, the goals, objectives,
policies and actions steps have been re- organized and refined to better express
the current direction for the future of the Park.
5. Ford Park Sub -Areas
Seven sub -areas of the Park have been defined and are used as a forum for
discussion of how specific areas of the Park will be managed and to establish
expectations on potential future improvements within the Park.
6. Illustrative Plan
The 2013 Illustrative Plan is a refinement of the illustrative plan from the 2012
Plan, it depicts existing improvements and at a diagrammatic level improvements
that may occur in the future.
7. Design Criteria
The 1985 Plan included design criteria to be used to evaluate building, site and
landscape improvements proposed for the Park. The 2013 Plan expands and
refines these design criteria.
8. Park Management
Park management is provided in this section, along with discussion of how the
Town will review proposals for new uses or buildings within the Park.
9. Appendix
An extensive number of documents relative to the history of the Park and
previous park planning efforts have been assembled. These documents are
provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental
Appendix.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 4
Chapter 2 - SITE ASSESSMENT /EXISTING CONDITIONS
Located immediately east of Vail Village, the proximity of Ford Park to Vail Village and
the convenient access it affords residents and guests is one of the Park's most
significant attributes. This is no coincidence as the 1974 Vail Plan documented how the
location of Ford Park was a key factor in it being purchased for a community park and in
defining the initial vision for the Park to be a major center of cultural and recreational
activity for the community.
"all properties of significant size within the Town limits were researched
and the recommendation made that the Anholtz property, adjacent to
development at the east end of the Village, was the only site satisfying the
recreational uses anticipated. Selection criteria included such factors as
ease of walking distance from the Village, adequate space within a single
parcel for large, meadow -like turf areas, proximity to the Frontage Road
for simple and direct access by autos or buses, natural beauty such as the
Gore Creek provides, and directness of connection to major bicycle and
pedestrian trails. "
The Vail Plan, 1974
When purchased, the original Anholtz property was +/ -36 acres. Today, Ford Park is
comprised of approximately 47.1 acres. The four areas of the Park and their acreages
are depicted below:
+1 -a.6 Acres
Ford Park, 2013
Main Na k
+1 -20.3 Acres
Core CreekJlJature Center
S— ri6d
ss A—
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 5
In January of 1977, Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, was passed re- naming the Anholtz Ranch
to the Gerald R. Ford Park. A copy of this resolution is included in the 2013 Ford Park
Master Plan Supplemental Appendix.
Existing Conditions
Over the past forty years many improvements have been made to Ford Park. Foremost
among these are athletic fields, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, the Betty Ford Alpine
Garden, a children's playground, the Vail Nature Center, the Vail Tennis Center and
parking and transit facilities. With the exception of the Gore Creek Corridor, the majority
of the Park has been improved with buildings, facilities or other related site
improvements.
As a function of past improvement projects infrastructure necessary to serve the Park is
currently in place. Vehicle and pedestrian access to the Park and internal park
circulation has been established, a comprehensive utility system is in place to serve
Park facilities and drainage /storm water management improvements have been
completed.
Access and circulation is a key element of how the Park functions. On -site parking is
provided, but in keeping with the original concept for the Park the amount of parking is
limited. Parking for major Park events is provided in the Town's parking structures.
Access from these structures to the Park is provided by pedestrian corridors and the
Town's transit system. Pedestrian access is provided via the Gore Creek Trail and a
sidewalk along the South Frontage Road. Pedestrian access is also provided by two
bridges in the Golden Peak neighborhood. The Town's main transit stop is located on
the South Frontage Road with additional stops on Vail Valley Drive. These stops are
served by the in -town shuttle and by dedicated express bus service during special
events.
Site Characteristics and Park Design
Physical characteristics of the land and the relationship of the Park to surrounding uses
and facilities influenced the earliest design concepts for the Park. Some of the more
significant site influences in this early design process were the South Frontage Road
(that establishes the north boundary of the Park), Gore Creek and adjoining wetland
and riparian habitat (that runs the entire length of the Park), site topography, vegetation,
views and other site considerations.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 6
Topography of the "main" park area includes a prominent and well- defined grade
change that creates an "upper bench" and "lower bench ". This grade change, created
in large part by grading from the construction of Interstate 70, defined the land area
available for various uses and over the years this became a demarcation for the Upper
Bench being used primarily for active recreation and the Lower Bench being used
primarily for cultural and passive recreational uses.
Much of Ford Park was initially developed without the benefit of a detailed
design /development plan. The 1974 Vail Plan did, however, set the stage for the future
design of the Park by defining a number of broad design objectives. There are many
examples of how these early objectives; along with site characteristics directly
influenced the design and development of the Park.
Parking and Transit
These facilities were located on flat terrain immediately adjacent to the South
Frontage Road. This location provides cars and buses direct access to the Park,
but in a location that keeps vehicles on the perimeter of the Park that minimizes
their impacts of on other areas of the Park.
Athletic Fields
Fields were located on the Park's broadest expanse of relatively flat terrain. Not
only did the fields "fit" on this portion of the Park, the flat terrain minimizes site
grading and associated site disturbance. To a degree, this location also isolates
field noise and activity from other park users.
The Amphitheater
The Amphitheater essentially "straddles" the grade transition between the Upper
and Lower Bench. This location allowed the Amphitheater to utilize the sloping
terrain to accommodate the terraced seating areas within the Amphitheater. This
location also affords stunning views to the Gore Range.
Nature Center
The Nature Center is located within the relatively undeveloped Gore Creek
Corridor. The natural features of the creek corridor provide a very suitable
location for a "nature center"
The 1985 Ford Park Master Plan spoke eloquently about the philosophy of good park
design and the role site conditions and characteristics should play in the design
process.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 7
"Compatibility of the park development within the environment is the most
significant aspect of the master plan. The existing landscape is an integral part of
each plan and not merely a backdrop against which the plans are staged. This is
essentially necessary with parklands, for there we expect the landscape to be
stable, pleasant and above all, functional. Accordingly, the planning and design
process was founded on a sound understanding of the features and dynamics of
the park site environment.
Just as a tapestry is woven from many threads of different colors, textures and
strengths, so the landscape is composed of a variety of components such as
slopes, soils, plant communities and aquatic features. Each of these must be
identified and described, but more than that, the role of each must be understood
as a dynamic entity so that limitations and opportunities can be property
understood. This involves the translation of forms, such as slopes and soil type,
into processes, such as runoff and soil leeching, and the definition of critical inter-
relationships among them ".
1985 Ford Park Master Plan
Integrating improvements with the landscape in order to create a pleasant and
functional park should be the goal of any park design. While developed over time and
without the benefit of a comprehensive, detailed design plan, the major elements of the
Park have been located and designed in a manner that is very responsive to site
conditions and other influences. In addition, Ford Park today reflects many elements of
the original vision for the Park as outlined in the 1974 Vail Plan and further defined by
the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 8
Chapter 3 - HISTORY OF FORD PARK and PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS
Over the past forty years the Town of Vail has completed four major planning efforts for
Ford Park. This chapter summarizes the purpose, the process and the outcome for
each of these planning efforts and in doing so provides relevant information on the
history and development of Ford Park.
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973 (a copy of which is included in the 2013 Ford Park
Master Plan Supplemental Appendix), authorized the purchase (by condemnation) of
the property known as the Antholz Ranch. At that time the 36 -acre park site
represented the last remaining parcel of land central to use by all residents and visitors
of the Vail community. The ordinance listed a variety of possible uses for the property
including the following:
• for park and greenbelt purposes,
• to preserve the natural and physical character of the area to be condemned,
• for bicycle, equestrian and hiking trails,
• for children's playground,
• for performing arts and civic center,
• for a ski lift and related facilities,
• for picnic areas,
• for recreational facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, gymnasium, ice
skating rink,
• for theater and assembly halls, convention center, public schools,
• for possible exchange or trade of condemned land, or a portion thereof, with
other property which may exactly meet the needs of the town, and
• to construct and maintain water works, transportation systems, and other public
utilities relating to public health, safety, and welfare.
The four major planning efforts for Ford Park include the following:
The Vail Plan, 1974
The Vail Plan was completed in August of 1973 and adopted in 1974 (a copy of this
plan is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix). While the
primary purpose of this plan was to address growth control and community
development, the plan included a chapter on the town recreation system. The Antholz
Ranch property was mentioned as "the only site capable of satisfying the anticipated
recreational needs of the community ".
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 9
The Vail Plan identified a wide range of potential uses for Ford Park. The uses included
a place for showing and creating art, crafts, etc.; an indoor theater as well as an 800
seat outdoor amphitheater; meeting rooms and community workshops; wide outdoor
terraces and natural landscapes; indoor ice arena, tennis and handball courts; children's
play facilities and space for family activities; headquarters for the Annual Vail
Symposium and local television; a possible location for an ecologium (nature center)
and a grammar school. As a balance to this extensive program of uses and facilities for
the Park, the Vail Plan contemplated the preservation of the Gore Creek corridor as a
passive, "quiet place" to enjoy the natural beauty of the site.
The overall vision described the park as a "major community park - cultural center ". The
plan called for 200 surface parking spaces for the daily parking needs of the park.
Parking for major events was planned to be provided in the Vail Transportation Center
with town transit and various trails and bikeways providing alternative means to access
the Park. The Vail Plan also depicted a potential road connection at the east end of the
park that would link the Frontage Road with Vail Valley Drive.
While the Vail Plan did not include a detailed design plan for the Park, the conceptual
site plan below began to define how the Park could be developed. A number of existing
park improvements reflect some of the basic concepts depicted below.
ors
-
Conceptual Plan for Ford Park, Vail Plan, 1974
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 10
Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan. 1985
In August of 1985 the Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan
Development Final Report was adopted by the Town Council (a copy of this plan and
Resolution No. 19, Series of 1985 is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan
Supplemental Appendix).
When the 1985 planning process was initiated improvements in the Park were limited to
athletic fields and tennis courts. A foundation for an amphitheater was in place but this
project was not yet completed. At that time the very eastern end of the Park along the
Frontage Road was utilized as a snow -dump.
The purpose of the master plan was to prepare a more detailed plan for the future
development of the park and to establish guidelines for the implementation of park
improvements. The master planning process included a Recreation Needs Analysis
Survey and extensive community input via workshops and community meetings. The
outcome of these efforts was an indication of the type and extent of improvements the
community wanted to see in the Park. Alternative site plans were considered and a
final, preferred plan was selected. This final plan included a swimming pool complex,
"neighborhood park improvements" (on the Lower Bench), a skating rink (on the Lower
Bench), and the realignment of the eastern softball field. Development of the
neighborhood park improvements on the lower bench of Ford Park included restrooms,
playground area, open turf area, picnic facilities, and the west access road. These
improvements were completed in November of 1988.
The first major structure to be constructed in the Park, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater,
was completed in July of 1987. A Parking and Transit Study for the Amphitheater was
completed in April of 1979 and this study made five recommendations: The Village
Structure should be considered the major parking facility for Ford Park, with
improvements to the signs, sidewalks, and bus service being necessary; extend shuttle
bus service to the soccer field; disallow Frontage Road parking; construct a vehicle turn-
around and passenger unloading area at Ford Park; and do not schedule concurrent
events in the Park. These recommendations were in line with recommendations for
parking and transit plan for the Park as outlined in the 1974 Vail Plan.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 11
r _�Fti� ry
w.,
GERALD R.
MASTER PLAN
- DEV WPMENT
A\
MASTER PLAN'
Ford Park Master Plan, 1985
The 1985 Plan identified a location for an alpine garden. In 1989 the first phase of the
Betty Ford Alpine Garden was completed. Since that time a number of expansions to
the gardens have been completed, including the Perennial Garden, the Meditation
Garden, and the Alpine Rock Garden.
Following approval of the 1985 Master Plan the following steps were taken regarding
the planning of Ford Park:
Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, was passed on November 3, 1987. This
resolution designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be
preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history. Vehicular traffic
was to be restricted and certain policies and procedures for preservation and
maintenance of the grounds and facilities were established by the resolution. A
copy of resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, is included in the 2013 Ford Park
Master Plan Supplemental Appendix.
In December of 1988, the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District (Now the Vail
Recreation District) and the Town of Vail, requested an amendment to the 1985
Ford Park Master Plan. The two phase amendment was adopted by Council as
Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988. A copy of the resolution is included in the
2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. Phase one of the
amendment was to allow the construction of four additional courts. Phase two of
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 12
the amendment changed the proposed location of an aquatic facility to the
eastern softball field. Funding of the aquatic facility was rejected by voters in a
special election on February 6, 1989. Vail Town Council was presented with a
petition to delete all reference to an aquatics center from the Ford Park Master
Plan in April of 1990. No record of Council action on the petition was found.
While the tennis center building is not mentioned in the Master plan amendment,
the VRD did receive a Conditional Use Permit for the project on May 8, 1990.
The Vail Village Master Plan, adopted in 1990, addresses Ford Park as a specific
study area. This plan acknowledged the use of the Park to accommodate
overflow skier and local parking needs. It recommended that the Park be studied
further as a site for additional skier parking to serve expansion of the eastern
side of Vail Mountain. Action Step #5 under Goal #5 states: Study the feasibility
of an underground (recreation fields would remain) parking structure in Ford
Park. The Parking and Circulation Plan (an element of the Vail Village Master
Plan), identified the western portion of the upper bench for potential parking
beneath the Park, and called for separated bike /pedestrian ways along the South
Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive.
The Vail Transportation Master Plan, completed in 1993, states that the existing
Ford Park Parking area (at the east end of the Park) should be considered for a
possible 2 -level parking facility with the second level below existing grade. Ford
Park and the athletic field parking area are also listed as two possible sites for
oversized vehicles if the lot east of the Lionshead Structure becomes developed.
Ford Park Manaaement Plan, 1997
The planning process that resulted in the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan process
was initiated in June of 1995 in response to several development proposals which had
been formally and informally discussed for the Park. These development proposals
included an Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, a cultural /performing
arts center, expansion of the tennis facility, athletic field fencing, and a community
parking structure. This planning process was also seen as a means to solve existing
park management issues. Park management issues included parking shortage,
Frontage Road access, pedestrian access and circulation, access for the elderly and
disabled, utilization of the lower bench, conflicts between uses within the Park, conflicts
with adjacent property owners, and delineation of financial responsibilities.
At the time the project was authorized, Town Council expressed concern that a new
master plan for Ford Park could result in an excessive amount of new development. In
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 13
response, staff noted the intention of the project was to create a management plan as a
means to adequately and consistently evaluate development proposals, with the goal of
limiting development and protecting the character of the Park.
Park leaseholders along with two neighborhood representatives and town staff served
as the Stakeholder Group for the planning process and a third party facilitator was
retained to coordinate this effort. The Stakeholder Group developed alternative design
solutions addressing among other things parking, vehicular access, Frontage Road
improvements, additional sports facilities and management policies. These plans were
presented to the public in an open house at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater in June of
1996.
The open house presentation was a turning point in the process of developing the
Management Plan. Several residents were alarmed by the alternatives included in the
presentation and initiated a grass -roots movement to place a referendum on any future
expansion /development within the Park. This strong public reaction, combined with a
lack of closure within the Stakeholders Group, prompted the Town to revise the process
to include more community involvement. Three Focus Group meetings and public input
sessions were held throughout the fall of 1996.
The results of the focus groups and public input sessions and a preliminary master plan
framework were presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission and the
Town Council in late -1996. The PEC and Town Council directed staff to proceed with
drafting the management plan as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan
based on the input received and presented. The management plan was adopted in April
of 1997. Major elements of the plan were six goal statements along with objectives,
policies and actions steps intended to define the future direction for the Park. The 1997
Plan also included an Illustrative Plan that identified a number of future improvements
for the Park. Foremost among these was identifying the Soccer Field a location for an
Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden.
Following approval of the 1997 Management Plan the following related actions were
taken regarding the planning of Ford Park:
Goal #4 of the Vail Village Plan Master Plan (as amended in 1998) addressed
the preservation of "existing open space areas and expansion of green space
opportunities ". An action step associated with this goal is to "explore the
feasibility of expanding Ford Park to the west to Vail Valley Drive and /or Slifer
Plaza along the Gore Creek stream tract to provide improved pedestrian and
handicapped access to the Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 14
The 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan identified a wide range of roadway
improvements designed to accommodate traffic levels anticipated to meet 2025
demands. One of these improvements contemplates a roundabout at the west
end of Ford Park to "serve as a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound)
and to potentially serve a future parking structure ".
2012 Management Plan Update
In 2012 the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan was updated to reflect new ideas for
improvements planned for the Park. Plans to make improvements to the Park were
initiated when Vail voters approved funding by re- allocating a portion of the +/-
$9,000,000 Convention Center Funds to Ford Park. The other stakeholders in the Park
also participated in the funding of these improvements.
rte•• s
wu.na�we pia N - -- AECOM o,.�,_.
2012 Ford Park Management Plan Update
The 2012 Update maintained the overall direction for the Park as established by the
1997 Management Plan and in doing so furthers the role the Park has played in the
community for the past 30 years. With only a few exceptions the 2012 Update suggests
no significant changes to the uses, facilities and activities that currently take place in the
Park. One exception is the development of an Education Center for the Betty Ford
Alpine Garden along Gore Creek adjacent to the main entry to the Gardens. All of the
existing major uses in the Park — athletic fields, passive recreation, the Gerald R. Ford
Amphitheater, the Alpine Gardens and Tennis Center remain in place. The Update did
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 15
not change any of the six major goal statements (or related objectives, policy
statements and action steps) as outlined in the 1997 Management Plan.
The most significant changes reflected in the 2012 Update are found in the Illustrative
Plan Component of the Plan. The Illustrative Plan provides conceptual site plan
diagrams and narrative explanations of improvements suggested for the Park. Many of
these park improvements were first identified in the 1997 Plan, others evolved out of
discussions with the Town, stakeholders and the community. Many of these
improvements were initiated in 2012 and 2013. Foremost among them were major re-
modeling of the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, re- construction of East Betty Ford Way,
improvements to the parking and transit area, expansion and re- configuration of the
athletic fields and new concession and storage buildings associated with the fields.
A copy of the 2012 Management Plan Update is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master
Plan Supplemental Appendix
Time Line of Ford Park Activities:
April 1973 Condemnation of Antholz Ranch, Ordinance 6, 1973
August 1973 Completion of Vail Plan
January 1977 Antholtz Ranch named Gerald R. Ford Park, Resolution 1, 1977
August 1985 Completion of Ford /Donovan Park Master Plan,
July 1987 Amphitheater construction completed
August 1987 Alpine Demonstration Garden completed
November 1987
December 1987
November 1988
December 1988
December 1988
May 1989
July 1989
January 1990
February 1990
April 1990
May 1990
June 1991
April 1993
December 1993
June 1994
June 1995
Preservation of Nature Center, Resolution 27, 1987
Vail Valley Foundation lease signed
Lower Bench improvements completed
Ford Park Master Plan amendment by VRD, Resolution 44, 1988
Service agreement with VRD, Resolution 46, 1988
Tennis Center receives Conditional Use Permit
Alpine Perennial Garden completed
Completion of Vail Village Master Plan
Aquatic Center rejected by voters in special election
Council petitioned to delete Aquatic Center from Master Plan
Tennis Center construction completed
Alpine Meditation Garden completed
Completion of Vail Transportation Master Plan
Vail Recreation District agreement renewed
Vail Alpine Garden Foundation license agreement signed.
Town begins Ford Park Management Plan
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 16
October 1996
April 1997
1999
2008
2009
November 2011
May 2012
Council allows Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to proceed through
process with Educational Center plans at Soccer Field parking lot
Ford Park Management Plan adopted
Lease with Vail Valley Foundation renewed
Lease with Vail Recreation District renewed
Vail Transportation Plan Update completed
Voters approve use of Conference Center Funding for Ford Park
Improvements
Completion of 2012 Update to Ford Park Management Plan
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 17
Chapter 4 - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS
The community's goals for Ford Park are summarized in six major goal statements and
within each goal statement are objectives, policies and action steps. Each goal
statement focuses on a particular aspect of Ford Park. The 1997 Management Plan
provided a starting point for the goals, objectives and policies outlined below and many
of these new statements include elements from the 1974 Vail Plan and the 1985 Ford
Park Master Plan. The new goals, objectives and policies also reflect the outcome of
Town Council and community input from the 2013 master plan process.
The goal statements were written to be consistent with and complementary to each
other. They are to be used to provide a framework, or direction, for decision - making
regarding the management and future uses of Ford Park. A series of objectives
following each goal statement outline specific steps that should be taken toward
achieving each stated goal. Policy statements are intended to guide decision - making in
achieving each of the stated objectives. Action steps involve specific actions to be
taken in implementing the goal and objective statements. The goals, objectives and
policies of this Plan will be considered during the review process for any new
development or improvements proposed to the Park and further that only those
proposals deemed to be in compliance with these statements will gain approvals.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 18
Goal #1:
Protect the natural environment along the Gore Creek corridor and establish
appropriate controls and review procedures to ensure that any new use or
building within the Park does not adversely affect the character and quality of the
Park or the overall experience of park users.
Objective 1.1: Limit uses and future development to that which is consistent with these
goals, objectives and policies and consistent with the Ford Park Sub -Areas and
Illustrative Plans.
Policy Statement 1: Proposals for new or changes to existing facilities or uses
that curtail existing public uses within the Park will not be permitted unless there
is either a compelling public interest or adequate alternative facilities can be
provided.
Policy Statement 2: The existing variety of uses and facilities in the Park will be
maintained.
Objective 1.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.1.1: Draft a new ordinance to exclude those uses listed in
Ordinance No.6, Series of 1973, now considered to be inappropriate, and
to redefine the allowable uses within Ford Park. The following uses that
are allowed and prohibited for Ford Park shall take precedence over
Section 12 -9C -2 of the Vail Town Code concerning the General Use Zone
District:
Allowed Uses
Park and greenbelt
Bicycle and hiking trails
Children's playground
Active recreation
Passive recreation
Outdoor amphitheater
Botanical gardens
Environmental, educational, and historical centers
Picnic areas
Recreation and athletic facilities
Public utility easements
Parking (surface parking /structured parking)
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 19
Administrative offices for the operation of uses occurring within the Park
Public Art Display
Concerts and Special Events Venues
Prohibited uses
Ski lift and related facilities
Civic center, convention /conference center, public schools, gymnasium,
and assembly hall
Swimming pools
Equestrian trails
Type III and IV employee housing
Action Step 1.1.2: Review legal descriptions of existing lease areas for the
Vail Recreation District, the Vail Valley Foundation and the Betty Ford
Alpine Garden and modify, as deemed necessary, so legal descriptions
correspond with existing and proposed improvements and uses.
Objective 1.2: All existing facilities and uses in the Park are maintained at a high level
of quality and that appropriate review procedures, review criteria and design standards
for evaluating any new development proposals or other proposed changes to Park are
clearing established.
Policy Statement 1: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall be deemed to conform to the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan, including
but not limited to:
• Goals, Objectives and Policy Statements,
• Sub -Area Plans, and
• Illustrative Plans.
Policy Statement 2: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall be reviewed for compliance with Ford Park Design Criteria, as well as
other applicable Town regulations.
Policy Statement 3: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall be determined to provide a needed recreational, educational, cultural
or social benefit to the community.
Policy Statement 4: Existing facilities, uses and functions within the Park will be
maintained and operated at a high standard of quality reflective of the Vail Brand.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 20
Objective 1.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.2.1: With participation of all Park stakeholders, Town staff to
prepare standards which outlines expectations regarding the appearance,
maintenance, and operation of facilities within the Park.
Objective 1.3: Preserve and protect the 100 -year floodplain, riparian and wetland
habitat along the Gore Creek Corridor and scenic viewsheds from the Park.
Policy Statement 1: Uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor
shall be limited to only those prescribed in the Gore Creek Preservation Sub-
area.
Policy Statement 2: No new buildings should be permitted within the Gore
Creek Preservation Sub -area.
Objective 1.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.3.1: Evaluate the need for and feasibility of strengthening
preservation controls within the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area by
establishing a conservation easement or by establishing the "Open Space"
designation via the Natural Area Preservation Zone District.
Action Step 1.3.2: Inventory existing conditions of the creek bank and
vegetation within the Gore Creek corridor and initiate restoration programs
as may be necessary.
Objective 1.4: Enhance the use and ensure the preservation of the Historic School
House.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain public access to the School House and continue
the utilization of the building in accordance with the terms of the lease with the
Betty Ford Alpine Gardens.
Objective 1.4 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.4.1: Evaluate future alternative uses for the School House
that will maintain public access and potentially involve the display of
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 21
historic photos and artifacts or other activities in keeping with the historic
nature of the building.
Action Step 1.4.2: Complete a historic architectural assessment of the
School House and establish a plan to protect and enhance the historic
character of the building.
Objective 1.5: Enhance the Nature Center building and the natural character of the
surrounding area and promote the use of this asset for environmental and other
educational programs.
Policy Statement 1: Vehicular access to the Nature Center will be minimized
and the landscape surrounding the building will be restored and enhanced.
Policy Statement 2: New uses proximate to the Nature Center should be limited
and shall be consistent with the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -Area.
Policy Statement 3: The architectural integrity of the Nature Center building
should be restored.
Objective 1.5 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.5.1: Work with the Vail Recreation District to evaluate
potential expansion of uses and programs for the Nature Center.
Action Step 1.5.2: Complete an architectural inventory of the Nature
Center building and initiate a plan to restore the historic character of the
building.
Action Step 1.5.3: Define a list of appropriate uses for the Nature Center
that are consistent with the goals for the preservation of the Gore Creek
Preservation Sub -Area.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 22
Goal #2:
Provide open space, facilities, and programs within Ford Park to meet the passive
and active recreational, educational, social and cultural needs of residents and
guests of Vail.
Objective 2.1: Maintain areas within the Park for the passive enjoyment of nature and
open space and preserve significant view corridors to the Gore Range, Gore Creek, and
Vail Mountain in order to reinforce the Park's connection to the natural environment.
Policy Statement 1: The Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area of the Park shall be
maintained for the "quiet enjoyment of nature ", uses and activities within this area
shall be limited.
Policy Statement 2: The primary use of the open turf area within the Lower
Commons Sub -Area should be to provide a place for un- programed and informal
passive recreation. The use of this area for special events should be limited in
frequency and scope in order to minimize impacts on the primary use of this
area.
Objective 2.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 2.1.1: Replace the Children's Playground restrooms with
expanded and improved facilities.
Action Step 2.1.2: Establish management and operations policies for
special events within the open turf area of the Lower Commons Sub -area.
Action Step 2.1.2: Identify key viewsheds from strategic locations within
the Park and as may be necessary establish designated view corridors to
ensure the protection of these viewsheds.
Objective 2.2: Utilize Ford Park to meet the community's needs for active recreation
and formal team sport activities.
Policy Statement 1: Active recreation and team sport activities shall be
concentrated within the Active Recreation and Soccer Field Sub -Areas and
limited in other sub -areas of the Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 23
Policy Statement 2: Landscape berms and buffers should be maintained and
enhanced to mitigate potential impacts of noise and activity on other sub areas of
the Park.
Objective 2.3: Maintain, and enhance where appropriate, the role of the Park in
providing facilities for the enjoyment and exploration of the arts, music, dance,
education and other cultural pursuits.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain the Ford Amphitheater as the primary summer-
time performing arts facility in the Town of Vail.
Policy Statement 2: Support Art in Public Places in their efforts to continue
public art programs (i.e. interactive events, projects, installations, educational
activities, etc.) within the Creekside area of the Lower Commons Sub -area (and
other areas of the Park as may be deemed appropriate).
Policy Statement 3: Support the educational programs provided by the Nature
Center and the Betty Ford Alpine Garden.
Objective 2.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 2.3.1: Work with the Vail Valley Foundation on their proposal
to create a new "public plaza" at the entry to the Gerald R. Ford
Amphitheater.
Action Step 2.3.2: Work with the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation on
their proposal to create an educational and visitor center within the Park.
Action Step 2.3.3: Coordinate with the Vail Recreation District on an
evaluation of the Nature Center Building and grounds to identify
opportunities to restore the integrity of the building and improve the
appearance of the surrounding area.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 24
Goal #3:
Reduce vehicular intrusions into the interior of the Park and minimize to the
greatest extent feasible the impact of vehicular activity on users of the Park,
particularly on the passive use areas of the Lower Bench and along pedestrian
walkways.
Objective 3.1: Reduce the frequency of vehicular trips into the Lower Bench (the Lower
Commons, Gardens, Amphitheater and the Gore Creek Preservation Sub - Areas) of the
Park.
Policy Statement 1: Prior to approving any new facility or use or the expansion
of any existing facility or use in the Lower Bench it shall be demonstrated that the
proposal will not generate an unnecessary increase in vehicular activity in the
Lower Bench area of the Park.
Policy Statement 2: Uses in the Lower Bench shall operate in a manner that
limits vehicular traffic to the greatest extent possible. Vehicular access to the
Lower Bench of the Park should be limited to: maintenance; delivery of goods or
materials too large or too heavy to be carried by non - motorized means; access
for people with limited mobility; special transportation; and emergency services.
Policy Statement 3: Require all delivery vehicles to utilize East Betty Ford Way
to enter and exit the Lower Bench. Due to difficulties in maneuvering, large
(semi's) trucks shall access the Lower Bench via East Betty Ford Way and may
exit via West Betty Ford Way.
Objective 3.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 3.1.1: Establish a system for managing truck movements
proximate to the Amphitheater loading dock and for coordinating truck use
of East Betty Ford Way.
Objective 3.2: Reduce the presence of passenger vehicles in all areas of the Park, with
the exception of the Parking /Transit Sub -Area, and minimize conflicts between
service /delivery vehicles and park users throughout the Park.
Policy Statement 1: Passenger vehicle access to the Alpine Gardens, the
Amphitheater or other uses in the Lower Bench shall not be permitted other than
those used to provide access for people with limited mobility or to deliver goods
or materials too heavy to be carried by non - motorized means.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 25
Objective 3.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 3.2.1: Coordinate delivery schedules to reduce the frequency
of delivery and service vehicles into the Lower Bench during peak use
time periods.
Action Step 3.2.2: Require stakeholders to utilize on -site storage facilities
to reduce and control the frequency of delivery and service vehicles into
the Park.
Action Step 3.2.3: Improve traffic gate operations and restrictions on both
the east and west ends of Betty Ford Way to eliminate unnecessary and
unauthorized vehicular intrusions into the Park. Consider closing the
western access point of Betty Ford Way.
Objective 3.3: Concentrate vehicular activity within the Parking /Transit Sub -Areas by
improving vehicular access from the South Frontage Road and improving parking lot
design to maximize the number of parking spaces, aesthetics, and safety while
mitigating environmental impacts.
Policy Statement 1: All stakeholders are required to adhere to the Parking and
Transit Management Plan.
Policy Statement 2: A "no -net loss" of the +/ -200 parking spaces within the
Parking /Transit Sub -Area and the +/ -65 spaces at the Soccer Field Sub -area
shall be maintained. Any net loss of parking spaces shall only be considered
when off -set by a demonstrated improvement or enhancement of public transit
use or alternate means of transportation to the Park.
Policy Statement 3: Provide parking for Park users within the Parking /Transit
Sub -Area and facilitate the use of the Vail Village Parking Structure to satisfy
peak parking demands of the Park.
Objective 3.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 3.4.1: Town Staff, with coordination from Park stakeholders
shall prepare a Parking and Transit Management Plan, to include, but not
be limited to the use and access of parking lots, fee structures, transit
operations, etc.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 26
Action Step 3.4.2: Evaluate the feasibility of expanding the In -Town bus
route beyond Golden Peak to provide service along Vail Valley Drive.
Action Step 3.4.3: Implement an improved wayfinding sign program
directing pedestrians from the Village Parking Structure and Slifer Square
in Vail Village.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 27
Goal #4:
Ensure compatible relationships are maintained between all venues and all uses
within Ford Park
Objective 4.1: Coordinate with leaseholders on their scheduling of events in order to
prevent overlapping or simultaneous events that exceed the availability of community
parking or other park infrastructure.
Policy Statement 1: The Town of Vail through its designee shall coordinate an
overall annual schedule for events and uses at all Ford Park venues.
Policy Statement 2: No one event or type of use will be allowed to dominate the
usage of the Park.
Policy Statement 3: The Park is a Town of Vail community facility and in the
case of conflicting uses, functions that best serve the interests of the community
will have the highest priority. In all cases, final decisions regarding the use of the
Park shall rest with the Town of Vail.
Policy Statement 4: The day -to -day management and coordination of activities
in the Park will be assigned to the Town of Vail. The Town of Vail, through its
designee, will coordinate as necessary with a representative of the Vail Valley
Foundation, the Betty Ford Alpine Garden and the Vail Recreation District.
Objective 4.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 4.1.1: Expand the master schedule kept by the Town Clerk to
include all venues within the Park.
Action Step 4.1.2: Hold preseason event /activity coordination meetings
with all affected stakeholders.
Action Step 4.1.3: Hold semiannual (or as deemed necessary)
coordination and input meetings with the Town of Vail, leaseholder
representatives, and neighborhood and adjacent property owner
representatives.
Objective 4.2: Maintain and where necessary improve existing berms and landscape
buffers between facilities and uses.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 28
Policy Statement 1: The adequacy of berms and landscape buffers between
different facilities and uses shall be considered when evaluating proposed
changes to the Park. The type and extent of buffers to be provided shall be
determined based on the nature of the use and site design of the proposed
facilities or uses, and the design parameters outlined in the Ford Park Sub -Areas
and the Illustrative Plan.
Objective 4.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 4.2.2: Enhance existing landscape buffers between tennis
courts adjacent to the Active Recreation Sub -area and the Parking /Transit
Sub -area and evaluate the need to enhance landscape buffers between
other uses throughout the Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 29
Goal #5:
Provide a safe, enjoyable and efficient pedestrian circulation system both within
Ford Park and between Ford Park and Vail Village.
Objective 5.1: Provide clear and effective directional and informational signs to and
within Ford Park.
Objective 5.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 5.1.1: Develop a comprehensive sign plan to direct Ford Park visitors
from central sites in Vail Village and from each level of the Village Parking
Structure to destinations within Ford Park.
Objective 5.2: Improve pedestrian routes to Ford Park.
Policy Statement 1: The five existing pedestrian access points to the Park from
Vail Village and Golden Peak should be maintained and be managed to
maximize their effectiveness in providing access to the Park.
Objective 5.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 5.2.1: Implement improvements to the Gore Creek Trail that
will improve safety, grading, surfacing, and lighting.
Action Step 5.2.2: Evaluate opportunities for additional seating areas,
public art and other features to enhance the walking experience along the
Vail Village Connector (within the Gore Creek Sub -area) and where
appropriate provide rest /sitting areas along all pedestrian routes to the
Park.
Action Step 5.2.3: Establish gateways or portals (signage, monuments,
landscape elements, etc.) at the main entries to the Park (Frontage Road,
Gore Creek Trail, Manor Vail, Slifer Plaza, Vail Valley Drive and the
Parking /Transit Sub - area).
Objective 5.3: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park.
Policy Statement 1: New developments or other improvements in the Park shall
not be permitted to diminish the quality of the pedestrian circulation system and
when appropriate shall include provisions to improve pedestrian circulation.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 30
Objective 5.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 5.3.1: Improve the portion of Betty Ford Way within the Lower
Commons Sub -area to create a "feature pedestrian corridor" with
improved surface materials, lighting, seating and landscaping.
Objective 5.4: Encourage leaseholders in Ford Park, through their marketing efforts, to
promote walking or riding the bus as an alternative to driving to the Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 31
Goal #6:
Delineate financial responsibilities among Ford Park leaseholders and the Town
of Vail for both on -going maintenance /operation and capital improvements.
Objective 6.1: Formalize cost sharing arrangements with lease- holders for costs
associated with the Park's management and operation costs.
Policy Statement 1: All Ford Park leaseholders shall participate in cost sharing
with the Town of Vail for common operating costs at a level proportionate to the
leaseholders benefit from or relationship to said operation or management cost.
(or as may be outlined in current lease or license agreement). Management and
operations cost may include but are not limited to, electrical for pedestrian path
and parking lot lighting, trash removal, and parking lot and pedestrian path
maintenance costs.
Objective 6.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 6.1.1: Research current lease, license and use agreements to
determine existing financial responsibilities of each lease holder.
Action Step 6.1.2: As may be necessary, modify existing leases to correct
any inequities in utility billing procedures and distribution systems, current
utility use, and cost sharing relationships.
Objective 6.2: Create a cost - sharing agreement for Capital Improvement costs.
Policy Statement 1: Ford Park leaseholders desiring to make capital
improvements within their respective lease areas shall be required to provide
funding for those improvements and for any modifications outside of the lease
area necessitate by such improvements.
Policy Statement 2: Services, functions, and programs provided by Ford Park
leaseholders, bring visitors to the community who generate sales tax revenues
which in turn contribute to the General Fund. Residents of the community which
participate in those programs contribute to the Real Estate Transfer Tax through
real estate transactions. Both of these funding sources can be utilized by the
Town of Vail to pay for capital projects and improvements within Ford Park,
reducing the need for contributions from the leaseholders.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 32
Objective 6.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 6.2.1: Create and maintain a five year capital improvements
program for Ford Park.
Action Step 6.2.2: Establish the benefit/cost relationship for capital
projects to determine appropriate cost sharing agreements.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 33
Chapter 5 - FORD PARK SUB -AREAS
The topography of the old Anholtz Ranch is typical of a western Colorado riverfront
ranch — a broad expanse of flat land adjacent the river corridor and an upper terrace
elevated above the river. In the early years of Ford Park these two distinct areas came
to be referred to as the "Upper Bench" and "Lower Bench ".
"The basic structure of Ford Park is comprised of two broad terraces, or benches as
locally referred to, which step down the north side of the Gore Creek and is typical of
mountain, valley and stream physiography"
1985 Ford Park Master Plan
Ford Park topography /1985
Early plans for Ford Park (the Vail Plan) anticipated recreation - oriented uses (and a
number of buildings) on the Upper Bench with passive open space areas and an
amphitheater on the Lower Bench. Initial development of the Park included athletic
fields, tennis courts and parking facilities on the Upper Bench. Decisions on locating
these uses on the Upper Bench were made based on the terrain (availability of flat land)
and accessibility to the Frontage Road. Passive open space and the development of an
amphitheater were initiated on the Lower Bench. These plans and the early
development of the Park reinforced this Upper Bench /Lower Bench distinction. Over
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 34
time the Upper Bench came to be regarded as "recreation- oriented" while the Lower
Bench was regarded as being more oriented to cultural uses and passive open space.
The characterization of athletic use on the Upper Bench and passive and cultural uses
on the Lower Bench remains valid today, and the terms Upper Bench and Lower Bench
provide a good, albeit generalized description of the Park. However, to discuss the
future of Ford Park in terms of just the Upper and Lower Bench does not acknowledge
the many subtleties and distinctions throughout the Park that need to be considered in
this master planning process. It is for this reason that sub -areas are used to more
clearly articulate the goals and objectives for specific areas of the Park. Sub -areas are
intended to provide a forum for defining the unique areas of the Park, where
improvements or changes may be acceptable and where improvements and changes
may not be acceptable.
The seven sub -areas described below were defined based primarily on the existing
uses and site characteristics within the Park. In some cases sub -areas define one
single use. Examples of these include the Amphitheater and Alpine Gardens Sub - areas.
In other cases sub -areas include a number of related uses. Examples of these are the
Gore Creek Preservation and Lower Commons Sub - areas. In many cases the
pedestrian corridors that link the sub -areas and facilitate the movement of people
throughout the Park are used as boundaries between sub - areas.
The sub -areas were drawn with thought and attention to a variety of considerations.
That said, they should not be considered hard, inflexible "parcel" lines. It is reasonable
to anticipate that when considering future improvements for the Park that some latitude
with the location of a sub -area boundary may be appropriate. Any consideration to
modify a sub -area boundary shall be made in the context of the overall goals for the
Park and the vision for that particular sub -area.
The use of sub -areas to better understand how the Park functions and to express how
the Park may change in the future is not an attempt to "divide" the Park into parts.
Rather, the sub -areas provide an effective means for discussing the unique areas of the
Park in the context of the goals and objectives for the entire Park. With Ford Park the
adage "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" clearly applies.
The diagram below depicts the seven sub -areas defined for the Park. The narrative that
follows addresses the following considerations for each sub -area:
• Existing uses and facilities,
• The role the sub -area plays in the overall context of the Park,
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 35
• The relationship of the sub -area to adjoining sub - areas,
• Improvements or changes that may be appropriate at some point in the future,
• Any parameters or other limitations relevant to the future uses and activities
within the sub -area, and
• Any other considerations.
Sub -area discussions address the Park at a fairly broad, "master plan" level. More
specific discussion of potential future improvements that may be appropriate for the
Park are found in the Illustrative Plan Chapter of this Plan.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 36
�
� \ �
` \ �
$[ \3 !
oz
! \\
\ \\
9 �
�/ f /
/^ /$} ,
\ \- f�u/ / ®-
\0 Lp
} /
�
/ |
{�6
/f{
} 2
! 33/
Draft # DPEC Review
2013 Gerald m +e Park Master man Page 37
Parking /Transit Sub -area
The Parking /Transit Sub -area provides on -site parking for the "main" portion of Ford
Park and includes a transit stop, a passenger car drop -off area and a central
trash /storage facility. Strategically located along the South Frontage Road and on the
periphery of other park facilities and uses, this sub -area plays a vital role in how the
Park "works" by separating parking and vehicles from other areas of the Park. The
transit facility is a key component of the Park by facilitating direct bus service to the
Town's parking structures (which provide parking for "peak" demand days at the Park).
This parking /transit concept had its origins in the original planning of the Park.
"This major community park - cultural center will contain parking for over
200 cars and will also be served directly by the Town bus system. Major
parking will be accommodated in the transportation center ".
Vail Plan, 1974
Since the mid -70's the parking plan for Ford Park has been to provide "daily use"
parking at the Park with parking for special events provided at the Town's parking
structures. This parking plan was validated by a parking and transportation study in
1979 and this parking plan remains valid today. Functional transit facilities along with
pleasant, safe pedestrian corridors between the Park and the Village Parking Structure
are key elements to ensure the on -going effectiveness of this parking plan.
Prior to the improvements to the athletic fields in 2013 the Park had approximately 200
parking spaces. The athletic field expansion will require the removal of approximately
50 parking spaces at the west end of the parking lot. The re- design of remaining
portions of the parking lot will allow for the approximately 200 parking spaces to be
maintained.
A "no net loss" policy is in effect for the +/ -200 on -site parking at Ford Park. Any
proposed reduction to existing on -site parking spaces will only be considered in
conjunction with concurrent improvements to alternative means of transportation to the
Park. An example of this would be reducing the number of parking spaces in order to
improve transit facilities at the Park.
The parking lot was designed such that it can continue to be used for concerts and
other special events. It is anticipated that this use will continue.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 38
Future Improvements
With parking lot and transit improvements scheduled to be completed in the fall of 2013
and spring of 2014, it is anticipated that the Parking /Transit Sub -area will adequately
address the needs of the Park for the foreseeable future. Improvements that may be
considered in the future include:
• Design and installation of monument -type entry features at the two pedestrian
portals from the parking lot into the Park.
• Installation of traffic control devices (gates or other means) at the east and west
ends of Betty Ford Way.
The potential improvements listed above are also described in the Illustrative Plan
section of this Plan.
The idea of constructing structured parking below the existing surface parking lot has
been discussed in the past. This could accomplish two objectives — increase the supply
of on -site parking (parking that could also address other town needs) and allow for
some alternative use on top of what is now surface parking. On a related note is the
idea of developing parking below the tennis center and re- constructing the tennis center
on the surface of the structure. While either of these ideas could create new
opportunities for this area of the park, costs to do so would be significant. It is expected
that if and when this idea is pursued, an initial step would be to evaluate implications on
the overall goals for the Park and potentially initiate an amendment to the Park Master
Plan.
Active Recreation Sub -area
This sub -area is the focal point of active recreation, team sports, tournaments and on
occasion other events at Ford Park. The location of these uses (proximity to the
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 39
Frontage Road and parking, removed from the Gore Creek Corridor) is consistent with
some of the earliest design direction established for the Park. It is expected that these
uses within the sub -area will continue in order to meet the community's needs for active
recreation facilities.
Over the years significant plantings have created a landscape buffer between these
active recreation uses and other surrounding uses. These buffers should be maintained
and continually enhanced where necessary. Noise and other compatibility issues with
use of the athletic fields and adjacent uses will need to continually be managed (refer to
Goal 4 in Chapter 4 of this Plan).
- - - - - --
! -_----------------
Active Recreation
Future Improvements
Improvements to Active Recreation Sub -area (initiated in 2012 and expected to be
completed in 2014) were extensive and included expansion and re- organization of the
athletic fields, construction of a new restroom /storage building (at the west end of fields)
and a new concession /restroom building (at the east end of the fields). It is anticipated
that these improvements will address the active recreation needs of the community for
the foreseeable future. The only immediate improvements contemplated for this sub-
area are:
• Design and installation of monument -type entry features at the west end of the Park
along the Frontage Road and the two pedestrian portals from the parking lot.
• Ongoing enhancement of the landscape buffer around the perimeter of the Sub-
area.
• The 2009 Town of Vail Transportation Plan contemplates a roundabout at the west
end of Ford Park to "serve as a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound) and
to potentially serve a future parking structure ". No detailed design work on this
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 40
improvement has been done, but conceptually this roundabout could be located just
west of the athletic fields.
The existing Tennis Center is located between the Parking /Transit Sub -area and other
portions of the Park. East Betty Ford Way provides convenient and pleasant pedestrian
access to the Lower Bench of the Park along the southern end of the Tennis Center.
However, the tennis center presents constraints to establishing a convenient and
graceful pedestrian corridor between the parking /transit area and the Upper Bench. If
or when the relocation of one or more tennis courts is considered, study should be given
to how improved pedestrian flow could be established in this area.
The Tennis Center building has been in existence for over 25 years and the design of
the building is inconsistent with the architectural character of buildings recently
constructed in the Park. Consideration should be given to replacing or renovating this
building with a structure more consistent with the building design objectives for the Park.
The possibility of locating an education center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens within
Ford Park is discussed in the Alpine Garden Sub -area. The preferred location for this
building is along West Betty Ford Way. If the West Betty Ford Way site is determined to
not be a viable location for the building the Tennis Center site could be a "back up"
alternative. The potential site for this building is proximate to the Tennis Center
building. Coordination and cooperation from the VRD will be necessary if this site is to
be pursued.
The idea of constructing structured parking below the athletic fields has been discussed
in the past. This could increase the supply of on -site parking and also provide an
increase in parking to address other town needs. On a related note is the idea of
locating developing parking below the tennis center and re- constructing the tennis
center on the surface of the structure. While either of these ideas could create new
opportunities for this area of the Park, costs to do so would be very significant. It is
expected that if and when this idea is pursued that an initial step would be to evaluate
implications to the overall goals for the Park and potentially initiate an amendment to the
Park Master Plan.
Lower Commons Sub -area
The Lower Commons Sub -area plays an important role in the Park by providing
"structure ", or organization to the Park's overall site design. The area serves as a
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 41
"transition zone" between other uses and Betty Ford Way, which runs through the sub-
area, and provides a delightful arrival experience for pedestrians entering the Park from
the West. The Lower Commons Sub -area also provides some of the Park's most
important and popular facilities that collectively address a number of goals and
objectives for the Park. Specifically, the Lower Commons Area provides places for
recreational use, public art, the passive use and the quiet enjoyment of the Park. The
sub -area also provides buffers between Park uses, a transition to the Gore Creek
corridor and creates an important sense of "openness" within the Lower Bench.
This sub -area should continue to be managed to provide the uses and park features
listed above. There are no major changes contemplated to the three distinct, yet related
uses that occur in this sub -area. These three uses are:
Children's Playground
The playground is an immensely popular area of the Park. This use should continue.
While refinements and /or upgrading of play structures and facilities within the
playground may be made in the future, the basic size or "footprint" of the playground
should remain unchanged. The restrooms at the playground provide facilities for the
entire Lower Bench and there is a need to upgrade these facilities in the near future in
order to meet the demands of park users. Restrooms should be sized to be no larger
than necessary to meet the needs of park users. No other buildings are contemplated
in the playground area.
Open Turf Area
Aside from natural open space areas along Gore Creek, the open turf area is the only
area of the Park that is not "programmed" with organized uses and activities. It is
important that this area remains open and available for informal use by patrons of the
Park in the future. The area provides space for picnics, rest, informal "games" and
other passive recreation use. The turf area also provides an important buffer, or
transition from the more actively developed areas of the Park and the Gore Creek
Corridor. Given this areas adjacency to Betty Ford Way, it is critical to limit vehicles in
this area of the Park in order to prevent conflicts between park users and vehicles.
With the exception of landscape improvements, lighting, seating and other similar
features, the open turf area should not be reduced in size and no buildings or structures
should be permitted in this area. In the past the southern end of the open turf area has
been used for events (weddings, parties, etc.) that have involved the placement of
temporary tents and other features within the turf area. While these events may
continue, the number and extent of such events should be limited and events that would
monopolize the open turf area and prevent its use by other users of the Park should not
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 42
be permitted. Any events in the open turf area should be managed in accordance with
Park procedures, specifically to minimize the time temporary facilities are in place,
minimize the number and extent of vehicles necessary to service the event, etc.
Cr
Lower
Commons
Creekside Area
The Creekside area is a narrow strip of land located south of Betty Ford Way and north
of Gore Creek at the natural "grade break" where terrain drops down to Gore Creek. A
few small structures (i.e. open air picnic shelter) are located in this area and the Arts in
Public Places (AIPP) have placed permanent art along Betty Ford Way. AIPP also runs
summer art programs in this area. Art programs may include activities such as
interactive events, educational and participatory activities. Permanent art installations
have also been located in this area. The passive use and the limited number of
permanent improvements within this area make it an excellent transition to the more
natural, undisturbed Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area.
The use and character of this area should remain unchanged. No new buildings should
be permitted. New art installations may be appropriate, however, if pursued, they
should be done in a way that minimizes impacts to other surrounding uses and facilities
and is sensitive to the landscape.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 43
Future Improvements
The only improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include:
• Upgrading restroom facilities at the children's playground.
• Further enhance the buffer between the athletic fields and the children's playground.
• Additional art installations within the Gore Creek Corridor.
• Upgrade to Betty Ford Way to include a slight widening of the walkway, decorative
pavers, seating areas, lighting and other streetscape improvements.
The potential improvements listed above are described in greater detail in the Illustrative
Plan section of this Plan.
Amphitheater Sub -area
An outdoor amphitheater was contemplated in original plans for Ford Park dating back
to 1974. Completed in 1987, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater has evolved into Vail's
most prominent venue for music, dance and other cultural events. The facility is
managed by the Vail Valley Foundation and is host to approximately 60 events each
summer. The amphitheater is considered one of the community's most important
cultural assets.
In 2012 the Foundation completed an initial phase of improvements to the amphitheater.
Improvements included re- contouring the lawn seating, new restrooms, expansion of
concession areas, and other improvements. While not a project of the Foundation, in
2012 the Town of Vail made major improvements (decorative pavers, widening, and
reduction to grade of walkway) to East Betty Ford Way.
The Foundation has plans for a second phase of improvements to the Amphitheater that
would create a new "public plaza" at the entry to the Amphitheater. The purpose of the
plaza is to provide a multi -use space that serves as the primary arrival for the
Amphitheater and as a pre- convene and post- function space during scheduled events.
The plaza could also serve as a new programmable space for smaller gatherings,
weddings or other events and could also be open for public access when not being
used for scheduled events.
Plans for the public plaza envision a hardscape area of approximately 4,000 square feet
to include a tensile roof element to provide shade and protection from rain.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 44
The relationship between the Amphitheater and the neighboring athletic fields will need
to be continually monitored to ensure compatibility between these (and all) park users is
maintained. It is important to protect and enhance areas of existing vegetation in and
around the Amphitheater and where appropriate improve the physical buffers between
these uses. The implementation of noise mitigation at the north end of the amphitheater
to minimizing noise impacts from the athletic fields and Interstate 70 has also been
discussed. Any measures to mitigation noise from the athletic fields and Interstate 70, if
pursued, would also need to consider adverse impacts to the sound quality of
performances within the Amphitheater.
The Amphitheater is a significant generator of people and also generates a significant
amount of vehicular traffic into the Lower Bench. Vehicular traffic into the Lower Bench
conflicts with a number of goals and objectives for the Park. It is important for the Town
and the Vail Valley Foundation to continue to work together to minimize vehicular traffic
to the Amphitheater. No new uses or expansion of existing uses at the Amphitheater
that would generate appreciably more vehicular traffic into this area of the Park should
be permitted. Managing and limiting vehicle traffic that may result from the operation
and use of the proposed public plaza will be an important consideration in the
evaluation of this proposal.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 45
Future Improvements
Potential improvements contemplated for the Amphitheater Sub -area include:
• Development of a "public plaza" at the entry to the Amphitheater.
• Restoration of the stream bank adjacent to the Amphitheater south of Betty Ford
Way and east of the pedestrian bridge,
• Upgrading of the fence /screening of the utility installation along Gore Creek west of
the pedestrian bridge.
There are a number of important parameters to be considered in the design and
development of the public plaza. These parameters are described in greater detail in
the Illustrative Plan chapter of this Plan.
Alpine Gardens Sub -area
What began with completion of a "demonstration garden" in 1987 has evolved into a +/-
1.5 acre network of perennials, rock gardens and waterfalls hosting an array of high
alpine plants. The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens (BFAG) provides an important
educational and experiential element of the Park. The gardens and the mission of the
organization is in keeping with one of the original goals for Ford Park to provide
environmental and educational facilities for the community. The Alpine Gardens have
become one of Vail's most popular summer attractions.
The Alpine Gardens has pursued the development of an "alpine education center" in the
Park for a number of years. The 1997 Ford Park Management Plan identified the
location for this facility to be within the Soccer Field Sub -area. During the 2012 Ford
Park Management Plan Update the BFAG proposed a location adjacent to Gore Creek
for the education building and the 2012 Plan identified this site (along with a number of
design parameters such as a square footage limitation of 3,000 square feet). The Town
Council subsequently revisited this recommendation from the 2012 Update, and while
expressing support for the BFAG to develop an educational building within the Park, re-
opened an evaluation of site alternatives for the building.
The Town Council's parameter for selecting a site for the educational building was that it
not be located on the Lower Bench. Five alternative sites were evaluated, two of which
were selected for further study. These two sites were at the Soccer Field and within the
Tennis Center. A sixth site adjacent to Betty Ford Way and just west of the Children's
Playground was also evaluated. Ultimately the Betty Ford Way site was selected as the
"preferred alternative ". The Soccer Field and Tennis Center sites could still be
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 46
considered if following further study it is determined that the Betty Ford Way site is not
viable.
The primary purpose of the building is to provide educational programs for the
community and accordingly the uses within the building are expected to include rooms
for interpretive displays, meeting /class rooms, a greenhouse and a limited amount of
administrative space. The total building size is expected to not to exceed 3,000 square
feet. Other design parameters and considerations to be addressed in the design of the
building are outlined in Chapter 6 - Illustrative Plan.
Future Improvements
Potential future improvements within the Alpine Garden Sub -area include:
�f
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 47
• Development of an alpine garden educational center.
There are a number of important parameters to be considered in the design,
development and operation of the educational center. Foremost among these is how
the BFAG can be managed to prevent vehicular traffic to the new building and the
design of the building relates to Betty Ford Way and the children's playground. These
parameters are described in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter of this Plan.
Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area
The Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area includes the entire length of the Gore Creek
Corridor that passes through the Park. The sub -area is over 21 acres in size and is
generally defined by the park boundary on the south and by one or more of the 100 -
year flood plain, the 50 -foot Gore Creek setback and /or topographic features on the
north. Gore Creek, associated wetland and riparian habitat and stands of specimen
trees are the primary features of the creek corridor. Existing improvements within this
sub -area are limited to bridges, trails, utility improvements and the Nature Center.
The Gore Creek corridor is the Park's most significant natural feature and provides the
Park with delightful natural open space for the quiet enjoyment of nature and a critical
link to Vail Village. The designation of this corridor as a "preservation zone" is in direct
response to a number of goals and objectives from previous park planning efforts and
the preservation of this area is also suggested by Goal #1 of this Plan. It is essential
that adjacent uses respect the natural environment of this sub -area and that effective
buffers be maintained between other more intensive uses within the Park.
It is intended that existing uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Preservation
Sub -Area be maintained, however in keeping with the goals of preserving this area no
new buildings are to be constructed within the sub -area. Any other new uses or
improvements should be limited to those that will complement the natural character of
the creek corridor.
Resolution No. 27 of 1987 designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an
area "to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history". While it is
acknowledged that the Nature Center will host a higher level of use and activity than
other portions of this sub -area, such uses should be concentrated on the "upland"
portions of the Nature Center in order to minimize impacts the creek corridor. The
resolution stipulated that "vehicular traffic is to be restricted and certain policies and
procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and facilities" should be
enacted.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 48
Improvements within the sub -area should be limited to low- impact improvements such
as soft surface walking paths, fishing access, and creek /stream bank restoration
projects. In all cases such improvements should be designed and constructed in a
manner that minimizes environmental impacts (i.e. avoidance of wetland habitat,
maintain existing natural vegetation, use of "best management practices ", etc.). The
underlying goal of any new trail development and /or bridge crossing should be to
improve access in order to enhance awareness of this important natural environment.
Utilities, drainage improvements should not be located within this sub -area unless no
other practical alternative is available.
The Gore Creek corridor between the main portion of Ford Park and Slifer Square
provides important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail
Village Parking Structure). This corridor is heavily travelled and provides access to the
Park for many park users. Enhancing the walking experience along the corridor will
ensure its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park. Installation of
seating areas, overlooks and public art are examples of improvements that could
animate this walkway. Any such improvements shall be outside of wetland areas and
the 100 -year flood plain.
y
Fishing access to Gore Creek, while currently not an issue (i.e. excessive use from foot
traffic resulting in damage to riparian areas and vegetation), could become an issue in
the future. A creek access point was considered at the east end of the Nature Center
(using the bus turnaround on Vail Valley Drive as an unloading area) but was rejected
as contradictory to the intended use of the Nature Center. A defined creek access point
is considered for a location east of Ford Park in the vicinity of the Pulis Bridge.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 49
An Action Step suggested for this area (refer to Chapter 3 of this Plan) is to evaluate the
feasibility of establishing a conservation easement for this area or to apply the "Open
Space" designation via the Natural Area Preservation Zone District. The protection
afforded by either of these steps would define more permanent limitations on the use of
this area and in doing so establish a degree of permanence in preserving this creek
corridor.
Future Improvements
Future improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include:
• Enhancement and restoration of vegetation along the creek corridor.
Enhancements to the walkway between Vail Village and the Park to include
improvements such as seating, art installations, etc.
Initiate steps to remove or reduce the use of existing parking located at the
Nature Center.
Soccer Field Sub -area
The Soccer Field Sub -area, while often overlooked as an element of Ford Park,
provides a valuable community asset. The full -sized athletic field serves the soccer and
lacrosse communities, the sand volleyball courts are heavily used and the 65 -space
parking lot is used year- around. A cul -de -sac at the east end of the sub -area allows in-
town buses to turn around when providing express service to Ford Park. These uses
should continue as they directly address the broad goals for the Park of "providing the
recreational needs of the community" (1985 Plan) and is consistent with the objective of
locating active recreation areas "away from the meadow and creek" (1985 Plan).
Separated from the rest of Ford Park by Vail Valley Drive and physically removed from
the more developed portions of the Park, the Soccer Field Sub -area does not have
compatibility or relationship issues with surrounding uses or facilities. The sub -area is
somewhat of an "island onto itself ". No major changes are contemplated to the existing
recreational facilities in this sub -area.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 50
-•�0%
1
Future Improvements
Potential future improvements within the Soccer Field Sub -Area include:
• Expansion of the existing sand volleyball courts.
• Expansion of landscape buffers.
The possibility of locating an education center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens within
Ford Park is discussed in the Alpine Garden Sub -area. The preferred location for this
building is along Betty Ford Way. If the Betty Ford Way site is determined to not be a
viable location for the building the Soccer Field site could be a "back up" alternative.
The potential site for this building is at the northwest corner of the parking lot. Covenant
restrictions currently do not allow for this building and would need to be addressed if this
location is pursued.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 51
Chapter 6 - FORD PARK ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN
The Ford Park Illustrative Plan provides a general description of future improvements
contemplated for Ford Park. The Plan indicates the general location of the
improvement, a summary of the proposed improvements and parameters or criteria to
be considered in the design, development and operation of the improvements. The
parameters and criteria are of particular importance as they establish specific
expectations for the proposed improvement. Conformance with these parameters and
criteria is a requisite to the Town approving any improvements in the Park.
The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan discusses a wide range of potential
improvements for the Park. Some of these improvements are only general "ideas ", an
example being the installation of art along the Gore Creek Corridor connection to Vail
Village to enhance the walking experience. Other improvements are considered
solutions that might be viable but not in the near term, an example being structured
parking under the athletic fields or a Frontage Road roundabout at the west end of the
Park. These types of potential improvements are not highlighted in this chapter.
Rather, this chapter highlights potential improvements that are further along in
discussion and more likely to be proposed in the near future.
It is not the intention of this Plan that only those improvements depicted on the
Illustrative Plan may be proposed for the Park. Improvements not depicted on the
Illustrative Plan may be proposed and will be reviewed relative to their conformance
with the goals, objectives and policies for the Park and the applicable Ford Park Sub-
areas. It should also be noted that the improvements being depicted on the Illustrative
Plan does not ensure if or when they will be implemented.
The 2013 Ford Park Illustrative Plan replaces the Illustrative Plan from the 2012
Management Plan Update. Some improvements contemplated by the 2012 plan have
been included in the 2013 Plan. Any improvement proposed for the Park is subject to
approval by the Town Council and further review by the Town's review boards prior to
being implemented. This review may involve the Planning and Environmental
Commission (Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan review) and the Design
Review Board prior to being implemented.
On the following page is the Ford Park Illustrative Plan.
symbols" which identify future improvements to the Park
these improvements follow.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan
This Plan includes "numbered
. Narrative descriptions of
Page 52
, MIA
,
-
.4
00
Draft #1.Pc[Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 53
Improvement #1 — Gore Creek Corridor Restoration
There are a number of areas within the Gore Creek corridor where erosion, use or other
factors have disturbed or otherwise adversely impacted existing vegetation. A
restoration program should be implemented to improve vegetation where necessary
along the creek corridor. Restoration will improve the visual quality of this area and
improve water quality by preventing erosion.
There are a number of areas along the corridor where enhancements could occur. A
detailed assessment of the creek corridor is necessary in order to determine precisely
where and to what extent restoration is needed. Following completion of this
assessment a detailed landscape plan for the restoration of the corridor should be
prepared and implemented.
A parallel effort should be to evaluate the condition of the creek bank in order to identify
the potential need for stream bank stabilization improvements.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #1, Objective 1.3, Action Step 1.3.2.
Improvements #2 — Gore Creek Village Connector
The Gore Creek corridor between the main portion of Ford Park and Slifer Square
provides important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail
Village Parking Structure). Enhance the walking experience along this this "Village
Connector" will ensure its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park.
The installation of seating areas, creek overlooks and public art are examples of
improvements that could be made to animate this walkway.
All improvements shall be outside of wetland areas, the 100 -year flood plain or other
environmentally sensitive areas. An inventory of the creek corridor to identify such
areas should be completed prior to initiating any improvements.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #5, Objective 5.2, Action Step 5.2.2.
Improvement #3 — Entry Monumentation at Park's pedestrian entries
Pedestrians arrive to Ford Park from one of seven existing entries. Refer to the
Illustrative Plan for these seven locations. Currently there is inadequate signage or
other features identifying these locations as entry points to the Park. The goal of this
improvement is to formally identify these portals and announce them as gateways, or
"arrival points" to Ford Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 54
Landscape features, signage, bollards, monuments, archways or other design features,
or some combination thereof, could be used to identify these locations. A design
process is necessary to evaluate alternative design solutions for these improvements.
While specific solutions for these park entry improvements could vary between
locations, all should share a common design vocabulary. It will also be important to
locate these improvements in a way that compliments the adjacent pedestrian corridor
and does not compromise pedestrian circulation.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #5, Objective 15.2, Action Step 5.2.3.
Improvement #4 — Betty Ford Alpine Garden Educational Center
The education center is envisioned to include multi -use space for year- around
educational programs and other activities, a greenhouse and limited administrative
space. Below are design, development and operational parameters and /or criteria to be
considered in the detailed design of this facility.
• Building and site improvements provide adequate clearances from
existing utility lines and drainage improvements and when necessary
such lines or improvements are relocated to provide adequate
clearances.
• A building of not more than 3,000 square feet that is "low- scale" in
appearance, does not visually dominate the surrounding area and
does not visually "loom" over West Betty Ford Way.
• Provide appropriate horizontal separation from West Betty Ford Way in
order to not diminish the quality of this walkway.
• Ability to construct the project in a manner that does not adversely
impact other facilities or uses in the Park.
• A viable management plan to prevent vehicular access to the building
(employees, service vehicles, deliveries, etc.), in order to maintain the
pedestrian nature of West Betty Ford Way.
• Demonstrate how emergency vehicles will access the building and
identify any site improvements necessary to accommodate such
access.
• Identify the anticipated parking demand from the building and
demonstrate how that will be addressed.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.2.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 55
Improvement #5 — Nature Center
Over the years a number of additions and modifications have been made to the nature
center building. Many of these changes have altered the historic character of this
building. An assessment of the building should be completed in order to understand
steps that could be taken to restore the integrity of this building.
Other improvements to the Nature Center include re- claiming the informal parking areas
proximate to the building and taking steps to limit vehicular access to the site.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.1.
Improvement #6 — Ford Amphitheater Entry Upgrade /Public Plaza
The Vail Valley Foundation has proposed plans for transforming the existing
Amphitheater entry into a re- designed and re- purposed "public plaza ". The plaza is
intended to provide a more gracious and more functional entry to the amphitheater. The
design intent and objective of this improvement is to create a multi -use outdoor space
that serves as the primary arrival for the Amphitheater as well as a pre- convene and
post- function space during scheduled events. The Public Plaza could also provide a
venue for smaller gatherings and events and also be open for public use when not
being used for scheduled events. The ability to utilize this space for gatherings and
other events could provide an alternative to the use of the open turf area for special
events.
Other elements of the Public Plaza include an "iconic" tribute to the Ford Family, a small
stage within the courtyard, a new "donor wall ", enhancements to the concession
building and ticket windows, and new entry gates to the Amphitheater.
Parameters and criteria to be considered:
• Plaza design should be done to facilitate /not encumber truck turning movements
necessary to provide loading /delivery to the Amphitheater.
• Trees removed to accommodate the Public Plaza should be re- located within the
Park and to the extent feasible be relocated proximate to the amphitheater.
• The space should be available for the public for gatherings and events and the
space should be open and accessible to the public when not being used for
private functions.
• Any structures /roof elements associated with the public plaza should harmonize
with the Amphitheater, not dominate the surrounding area, and also conform to
the Ford Park Design Criteria.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 56
• Any fencing that may be required to define the courtyard space or for liquor
license or other purposes should be subtle and visually unobtrusive. Landscape
materials should be used to soften the appearance of the fence.
A viable management plan for minimizing vehicular access to the social
courtyard (employees, service vehicles, deliveries, etc.), and for servicing
the facility in a manner that minimizes impacts on pedestrian use of Betty
Ford Way.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.1.
Improvement #7 — Children's Playground Restrooms
The playground restrooms provide facilities for the entire Lower Bench. These facilities
are under -sized and in need of upgrade and expansion to meet current demand. When
designed, the new bathroom building should be one level and be sized no larger than
necessary to meet the needs of park users. The location currently considered for the
new restrooms is west of the existing facility where play apparatus are currently located.
New play apparatus will be provided with the removal of the existing restroom building.
The building should not encroach on the adjacent open turf area.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2. 1, Action Step 2.1.1.
Improvement #8 — Betty Ford Way
The central portion of Betty Ford Way between the Covered Bridge and the
Amphitheater is envisioned to be a "feature pedestrian corridor ". This pedestrian way
will be treated with a higher level of design, surface materials, lighting, seating, etc.
Enhancements to Betty Ford Way will improve a park visitor's experience to and
through the lower bench of the park.
It is anticipated that the existing path will be widened from approximately 10 feet to
between 11 and 13 feet to accommodate the multiple user types that visit the park at
peak use times and to reduce conflicts when Amphitheater /golf cart shuttles share the
path with pedestrians. The path surface will be replaced with finer textured, higher
quality pavements such as colored concrete, or stone or concrete pavers. Seating
areas with benches at select locations along the path, landscape enhancements,
lighting and wayfinding may also be incorporated into this design.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #5, Objective 5.3, Action Step 5.3.1.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 57
Improvement #9 — Betty Ford Way Traffic Control
While it is acknowledged that the Alpine Gardens, the Amphitheater and other uses in
the Lower Bench require vehicular access, an underlying goal for the Park is to
minimize vehicular traffic in this area. Betty Ford Way provides car and truck access to
this area. As a means for better regulating traffic into the Lower Bench, the installation
of gates, bollards or other improvements will be necessary at either end of Betty Ford
Way. In addition to improvements designed to limit car and truck access to the lower
bench, a system for managing large truck use on East Betty Ford Way should also be
explored. This section of Betty Ford Way is essentially a one -lane road. The purpose
of this effort is to prevent two trucks from utilizing East Betty Ford Way at the same
time.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #3, Objective 3.2, Action Step 3.2.3.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 58
Chapter 7 - DESIGN CRITERIA
Note — this chapter is still under development. Below is an initial list of potential design
criteria for Ford Park. The notion of including design guidelines in the master plan
evolved from the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan which included design guidelines. It
should be noted that the Town's Zoning Code includes design guidelines, a chapter of
which is devoted to "park design guidelines ". As an alternative to incorporating design
guidelines into the master plan, an alternative would be to embellish as deemed
necessary the park design guidelines found in the zoning code. This topic will be
discussed with the PEC.
Architectural Design
Architectural Character
Scale /Integration with Site
Building Materials /colors
Roofs
Lighting
Landscape and Site Design
Grading
Hardscape /pavers
Plantings — screening /buffering /soften "edges" /frame views /preservation of existing
vegetation
Transitions between manicured /native
Lighting
Play Structures
Construction Practices
BMP's
Erosion Control
Construction Management Plan
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 59
Chapter 8 - PARK MANAGEMENT
Note — this chapter is still under development.
Four organizations play a role in the management and operation of Gerald R. Ford
Park. The Town of Vail is the owner of the Park and manages the community park on
the Lower Bench, the stream tract, parking lot areas and pedestrian corridors. In
addition, the Town provides overall park management and coordination with the Park's
three leaseholders. The leaseholders manage and operate their respective facilities:
The Vail Recreation District lease includes the Tennis Center, athletic fields and
Nature Center. The Tennis Center Building is on land owned by the Town but
was developed and funded by the VRD. VRD offers environmental education
and research opportunities at the Nature Center.
The Vail Valley Foundation, manages and maintains the Ford Amphitheater and
immediate surrounding grounds. The amphitheater seats up to 2,500 people and
is scheduled an average of 60 days during the summer months.
The Vail Alpine Garden Foundation manages the Betty Ford Alpine. The
Gardens have developed in four phases that began in 1987.
In its role as the overall park manager the Town addresses on an on -going basis a
variety of management and operational considerations. Often times this requires the
involvement of different town departments and town commissions and boards.
Ultimately the Town Council is asked to review and approve management practices. In
virtually every case the Town involves one or more of the Park leaseholders when
addressing these management topics and in some cases the lease agreements with the
Recreation District, Vail Valley Foundation and Alpine Garden Foundation address
these topics. Below is a list of park management topics the Town is responsible for:
• Parking — manage use of parking spaces, allocation of spaces to leaseholders,
rates at times pay - parking is implemented, etc.
• Special events on parking lot, athletic fields and Open Turf Area — coordination
with promoters of events, scheduling, pre and post -event operations, etc.
• Overall Park Calendar — While not responsible for scheduling events within
leaseholder facilities, the Town coordinates (with leaseholders) an overall events
schedule for the Park.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 60
• Transportation — management of transit operations between the Park and the
Vail Transportation Center, including periodic implementation of a Golden Peak
bus route.
• AIPP projects - overview of review process.
• Proposed new use or new building - overview of review process.
• Cost sharing of park expensive, funding of capital improvements.
• Appearance standards.
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 61
Chapter 9 - APPENDIX
An extensive number of documents relative to the history of the Park and previous park
planning efforts have been assembled. Due to the volume of this material, these
documents are provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan
Supplemental Appendix. Material found in the Supplemental Appendix includes:
1. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, authorizing the purchase (by condemnation) of
the property known as the Antholz Ranch.
2. The Vail Plan, 1974
3. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, naming the property commonly known as the Antholz
Ranch to Gerald R. Ford Park.
4. The Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final
Report, 1985
5. Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, this resolution designated the seven acres
around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore
Valley's natural history.
6. Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988, amending the 1985 Master Plan to add four
tennis courts and to change the location of the aquatics center.
7. Ford Park Management Plan, 1997
7. Ford Park Management Plan Update, 2012
Draft #1 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 62