The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutB13-0013 Special Inspection Report (2) corrections required West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC Report # 1 3177 Glendam Dr . Grand Junction , CO 815 Q4 Page 1 of 1 Phone : 970 - 43 4 - 698 8 Cell : 970 - 260 - 2844 Ins ect� on Re rt 0 Date : 10 - 1 - 13 Client : HP Geotech �Job ##HP 112 111B ) Project : Mill Creek Properties Address : � 03 Mill Creek Circle Vail , CO Building Permit No : B 13 - OQ 13 �eneral Contractor ; George Shaeffer Construction Company Contractor that Performed Work : Myers & Company Ins ection of sho fabrication or field work at ' ob site : Field Report : Visually inspected the field vvelding at steel beam to wall embed connections & ledger angle to embed connections a most locations { some of ledger angle welds at top sides were covered with steel decking 8� could not be inspected) basement level framing . �lisually inspected the field welding at steel beam to wall embed connections & perimeter channel steel to wall embed connections grids 5 to 6 ground level framing . Note high strength bolting at areas inspected above was not �et completed & will need to be inspected at a later date . The field welding inspected above appeared to be in substantial conformance with the plans , and the quality requirements of the AWS D 1 . 1 Structural Welding Code e�cept as note below . 1 ) Noticed angle clips at one side of steel beam to wall embed connections were not welded , as there did not appe �.r to be enough room between the steel beam 8� concrete �vall to perform the welding . Noticed this condition a basement/garage elevator framing level grids 1 to 2 . 5 , and ground level framing grid E/ 5 . 2 ) Typ . weld detail on Myers & � ompany plan E21 for steel beam to wall embeds just showed the angle clips welded on the vertical sides . I guess this was revi �wed by the stru.ctural engineer 8� that welding was not required on the top or bottom sides of the clips unless note �. . 3 ) Noticed embed plate appeared to be too low to weld top side of perimeter channel steel ground level framing at approximately grid D . 7/6 . 1 . 4 ) Noticed a weld ne � ded completed at perimeter channel steel to wall embed ground level framing at approximately grid C . 2 / 5 . 7 . Mitch Sturde the j ab site supervisor with George Shaeffer Const . was made aware of t�ese items c4� corrections should be reinspe ted at a later date . � Inspector/Technician : Douglas E Youn ; `�'��" �OU g � j 70 � � � � �r �2 �tTest Slope Testing & Inspection L,LC Report #2 3177 Glendam Dr . Grand Junction, CC� 815 � 4 Page 1 of 2 Phone : 970 �- 43 4 - 69 8 8 Cell : 970 - 26 � - 2844 , . Ins ectlon R e � r�t Date : 11 - d - 13 Client : HP Geotech (Job #HP 11 Z 111 B ) Pro j ect : Mill Creek Properties Address : 3 � 3 Mill Creek Circle Vail , C � Building Permit I�To : B 13 - 0013 General Contractor : George Shaeffer � anstruction Campan� � ontractor that Performed Work: M�ers & � ompany Ins e+ction of sbo fabrication or field work at ' ob site : Fie1d J Report : Visually inspected the field welding at steel beam to wall embed connections & perimeter channel steel to wall embed cannections bottom side only {top side was covered with wood sub floaring) grids 1 to 5 ground level framing , and inspected high strength l�olting at steel beam , column , and ' oist J connections ground level �raming . Visuall ins ected the field weldin at steel beam to wall emb � d connections Y p � � steel truss connections completed to date , 16 " x8 " x318 " tube steel connections grid line 5 , and erimeter channel steel to wall embed connections . Also ins ected hi h p p g strength balting at steel beam , colunln, and ' aist conneetions main level framin . J g The field welding 8� high stren�th bolting inspect� d above appeared to be in general conformance with the plans , and the uali re uirements of the AWS D 1 . 1 �l tY q Structural Welding Code � the AISC/RCSC Specification for A325 /A490 bolting except as note belov� . 1 ) Noticed angle clips at one side of steel beam to wall embed connections were not welded , as there did not appear to be enou roam betv�een the steel beam & � concrete wall to perfor�n the �velding . Noticed this condition as noted in re art # l � at basement/ ara e elevator framin level rids 1 to 2 . 5 & ound level framin g g g g �' g grid EIS . Also observed this condition on this �isit at grou�.d level framing grid C13 , Steel erectors had welded top flange of steel beams ta embed lates with multi p pass vvelds at side were angle clips could not be welded basement/ ara e elevator g g framing conr�ections , Top flanges of beams ground level �raming were not welded. Before a final report could be issued som� documentation would need to be provided regarding this condition as being acceptable or not to the structural . engineer . 2 ) Noticed angle connection clips were not installed./weld.ed at one side of the tube page 2 of 2 steel truss main level framing grid A . 8 /4 . It appeared that the wall embed plates were misaligned with the tube steel truss conneetions . 3 ) Noticed onl one an le cli was installed/welded at steel beam to wall face late �' g p p conriection main level framing grid C/5 . 4 , Appeared ta be a wall pocket too close to beam to weld Znd an le cli . � p 4 ) Some of the steel beam & joists cannections had been field welded in lieu of bolting varies locations where bolt holes did not align . Connections had generally been welded three side with 1 /4 " fillet vvelds , Have structural engineer . revlew/approve . � S ) �T elding & bolting �vas being completed were steel n�.embers had been cut loose ground floor framing grid C to D bet�een 1 c� 2 , and a fevv bolts needed tightened varies areas . Also beam connection clips needed welded main floor framing grid C , 2 at 5 . 8 & 6 . This work will need to be inspected an a fu.ture visit along with the remainder of the ro ' eet that was not et com leted . p J Y p Dou s E Y Ins ector/Technici n • D � cw � �so7 p a . ouglas E Young Q � � P . 111 West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC Report #3 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Page 1 of 2 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Inspection Report Date: 2-5- 14 Client: HP Geotech (Job #HP 112 111B) Project: Mill Creek Properties Address: 303 Mill Creek Circle Vail, CO Building Permit No: B 13-0013 General Contractor: George Shaeffer Construction Company Contractor that Performed Work: Myers & Company Inspection of shop fabrication or fietd work at 'ob site: Field Report: Met with the structural engineer Mark Mueller & Mitch Sturde the job site supervisor with George Shaeffer Construction Company discussed items noted in the previous special inspection reports # 1 & #2. Per our conversations it appeared that Mark was satisfied with the items note in the previous reports as is or as per his instructions to correct them, and would provide some written documentation. Visually inspected the field welding at steel beam to wall embed connections & field welded channel steel joist connections ground floor level framing grids C.5 to D.8 from 1 to 2 that was not completed and inspected on the previous visit, and high strength bolting that needed reinspected as noted in report #2 item #5. Visually inspected field welding at tube steel connections & high strength A325 bolting at steel beam/column connections as best as possible with wood framing & sheathing in place top of main floor level framing to roof level framing. The field welding & high strength bolting inspected/reinspected above appeared to be in general conformance with the plans, and the quality requirements of the AWS D1 . 1 Structural Welding Code & the AISC/RCSC Specification for A325/A490 bolting except as note below. 1 ) There appeared to be some welds that needed completed at steel beam connection beam 3B 19 main floor framing grid C.2/5.8, bottom of tube steel column SF4 upper level framing grid C.5/3 .7, and plate to steel beam connection top of sloped tube steel member upper level/lower roof framing grid D.8/5 .5 . Also a weld needed repaired (slag inclusions/incomplete fusion) at steel plate to sloped tube steel member upper leveUlower roof framing grid D.8/5 .5. 2) There appeared to be some A325 bolts/nuts that needed tightened to a minimum of snug tight at bottom of steel frame 4F 1 & 4F3 top of main level framing grid page 2 of 2 line 1 & grid C.2/3; and at steel beams 4B4 & 4B 17 upper level/lower roof framing grid 1 .9 & D.2/5.5. Note to the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspections of the structural onsite welding & high' strength A325 bolting on the project as outlined in reports # 1 thru #3 except for the items noted in this report. These items will need to be reinspected or some documentation/photos provided showing that welds have been completed/repaired & bolts tightened along with some written documentation from Mark Mueller the structural engineer in regards to items noted in reports # 1 & #2. Then a final report can be issued. Doug1�s E Yo Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young �'N� �6o�oi � QC16?SP. 7 /201 West Slope Testing 8� Inspection LL � Report #4 3177 Glendam Dr . Grand Junction , CCJ 815 04 Page 1 of 1 Pho�e : 970 - 434 - b988 Cell : 970 - 26U - 2844 Fi � al Ins ectlon Re ort � p Dates : 2 - 19 - 14 & 3 - 1 - 14 Clie �. t : �IP Geotech (Job #HP 112 111 B ) Pra j ect : Mill Creek Properties Address : 303 Mill Creek Circle Vail , CO Building Permit No : B 13 - 0 � 13 General Contractor : George Shaeffer Construction Company Contractor that Performed Work: Myers & Company Ins ection of sho fabrication or �eld work at ' ob site : Field Report : Reinspected field welding & A325 high strength bolting note in the previous report # 3 it�ms � 1 & ## 2 . The field welding c4L high strength bolting reinspected above now appeared to be in general conformance with the plans , and the quality requirements of the AWS Dl . l Structural Welding Code & the AISC /RCSC Specification for A325 /A49 � bolting . Also received & reviewed letters from the structural engineer in regards to items # 1 tl�ru # 3 noted in re ort # 1 , items # 1 th.ru # 4 noted in re art # 2 and one final p p � issue of concern in regards to connection of steel beam 3B 19 to embed plate at end of wall . It appeared that per his letters he was satisfied with these items as built . To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspections of the structural steel onsite welding & A3 25 high strength bolting on the proj ect , as outlined in reports � 1 thru # 4 . Ins e r ' ' Doug s E Young p cto 1Technician : Douglas E Young � wr o�o � 3 � C1 X,F' . ?/ 1l 14