Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB14-0040 REV2 plan APPROVED EXIST.BAT MITIGATION SHOWN FOR CLARITY STA NED 2X6 CEDAR HAND RAIL _ 5 1 EXISTING SUSPENDED CEILING � � A9.4 ARMATURE TO REMAIN AS IS (2) 2X WOOD FRAMING TO � RAISE RAILING AS � — PREFINISHED METAL �. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT 24" O.C. 6X6 TIMBER COLUMNS I � M SUSPENDED EXTERIOR � � ��,-���_ � � ' �, �� STAINED CEDAR CAP/ RE: STRUCTURAL � � GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT; RE - EXISTING WOOD FRAMING � �� � SPECIFICATIONS � � _� �� V I � STAINED CEMENTITIOUS � � REPAIR AS NEEDED � � �� �' � 4° X 4" STAINED WOOD TRIM i � � � � BOARD ABOVE FLOOR 2 � � �� 00 � � PREFINISHED METAL STRAP � , � STAINED CEDAR SIDING/ � � � � _ � c� STAINED CEMENTITIOUS `�, - � PAINTED METAL CROSS RODS � PRIMARY RE-USE EXISTING SILICONE FILL � BOARD ABOVE FLOOR 2; �� � RE: STRUCTURAL �� � � � @ CMU FLUTES; ALTERNATE: GROUT � OVER 1/2" PLYWOOD \ 4 � 4B d��, � FLUTES (1 COURSE) FOR BAT � � 6X12 TIMBER BEAM � � U PREVENTATIVE CLOSURE TO SOFFIT � SHEATHING OVER A9.4 I A9.4 ., EXISTING T111 � RE: STRUCTURAL � �%' � �-� �� w 4B CORRIDOR SOFFIT DETAIL \���� �' 3X12 TRELLIS PURLINS RIPPED DOWN � � ' � � A9.4 1-1/2" = 1'-0" � TO 3X10 AS METAL ROOF SLOPES / ° W � PREFINISHED METAL RE: STRUCTURAL �_� 0 , FLASHING CORRUGATED CORTEN METAL / I X � FASTENERS � SET FLASHING IN A BED OF � � � RE: STRUCTURAL � �/ SEALANT ROOF PANEL / � � o \ -- � J � / GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT 3 � � _� � O � �� � �� A9.� U 1/4 PLATE � FLOOR FINISH; CAST CONCRETE WALL WITH CONCRETE � � � � EXISTING STRUCTURAL � � RE SPECIFICATIONS STAIR, WITH 4" PRECAST CAP, CLAD IN r� � DECK ASSEMBLY � STONE; RE: STRUCTURAL I � � �� �� � � CONCRETE PIER CLAD IN STONE WITH 4" \ � 0 PRECAST CAP; RE: STRUCTURAL �. I � � �,� EXISTING ATTACHMENT . � ' '� � � � � „ � � � , ��-�/� CONCRETE PAVING � � � � � w �� � 3/4" BAR STOCK —� � EXISTING T111 FINISH `� '�-� �" � � FASTENERS ° \\ ` a � MOVE FIRE ALARM CONDUIT � SNOWMELT SYSTEM; � RE: STRUCTURAL EXISTING SUSPENDED � � o � CEILING ARMATURE TO INTO SOFFIT CAVITY RE: MECHANICAL � Q � REMAIN AS IS � -- � ; 1/4" PLATE 4» - POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIRS j� PREFINISHED METAL ; � .. � - RE: STRUCTURAL �� _. e F LAS H W G _ � � �C���'�"�/'`�'��-'`����.ey``/'.cy/�/.t�'i'.ey r'rv- r.�. � :. 4 � > _:-� _ � _ �, � , z: � :. ����/ _; � SUSPENDED EXTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT; RE � \ - STAINED CEDAR CAP/ � � � SPECIFICATIONS STAINED CEMENTITIOUS �� 3/4" x 3/4" WOOD TRIM BOARD ABOVE FLOOR 2 �, PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING 5 CORRIDOR RAILING DETAIL 4 CORRIDOR RAILING DETAIL � � SECTION DETAIL AT NORTH ENTRY A9.4, 3�� : 1�-��� A9.4, 1-1/2�� : ��-��� A9.4 �/2° : ��-��� �� �� ,� STAINED CEDAR CAP/ PLEASE NOTE STAINED CEMENTITIOUS 1 W � BOARD ABOVE FLOOR 2 ��A9.4 IN DECEMBER OF 2011 BRUCE ZIVIC MET WITH MARTIN ,J HAEBERLE TO DISCUSS MAKING MODIFICATIONS TO THE U STAINED CEDAR i STAINED CEDAR (NOM. 1X6) UNIT BALCONY RAILINGS. OUR MAIN THRUST OF THE � � � MODIFICATION WAS TO IMPROVE THE SPACING BETWEEN (NOM. 1X8) STAINED CEDAR (NOM. 1X8) 4x4 TS RAIL � THE VERTICAL RAILING FROM 6" CLEAR TO SOMETHING U � � � THAT MET OR EXCEEDED CODE REQUIREMENTS. DURING 0 � � THIS MEETING IT WAS ALSO DISCUSSED THAT THE w � SEE NOTE 'A'/A9.4 \� EXISTING RAILINGS WERE 39" AFF. I WANTED TO VERIFY / 2X2 TS BALUSTRADE O THAT RAISING THE GUARDRAIL WAS NOT REQUIRED = O RE: STRUCTURAL � SINCE WE WERE NOT REMOVING THE EXISTING RAILINGS � � \ SYSTEM AND REPLACEMENT OF THE RAIL SYSTEM WAS � z � � - -- MORE THAN OUR CURRENT BUDGET WOULD WITHSTAND. O 1-1/2" PIPE RAILING � (� O \ MARTIN AGREED THAT WE DID NOT NEED TO RAISE THE J O 6 UNIT RAILING DETAIL RAILING SYSTEM (3") SINCE IT WAS NOT BEING REMOVED � w U A9.4, NTS \ TO MAKE THE SPACING OF VERTICAL RAILS � � �, MODIFICATION. IN ADDITION HE THOUGHT THE CLOSER Q � •— STEEL PLATE BOLTED TO PRECAST SPACING OF THE RAILS WOULD BE A WELCOMED SAFETY � � � � � � FEATURE. HOWEVER HE CAUTIONED THAT IT NEEDED TO REPLACE WITH NEW CONCRETE CAP; RE: STRUCTURAL WOOD CAP � �� � BE KEPT IN MIND THAT IF DURING CONSTRUCTION THE RE: 6/A9.4 � EXISTING RAILING SYSTEM WAS INDEED REMOVED FOR / PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CAP I i I I ANY REASON THAT VAIL 21 WOULD NEED TO REPLACE IT CONSTRUCTION � R E P A I N T M E T A L R A I L S � � TO MEET CURRENT CODES INCLUDING THE 42" HEIGHT. � DRAWINGS � � `° AS A RESULT THE PROJECT PROCEEDED WITH THE { ��� ` � � ��� �' STRICT INSTRUCTION TO THE IRON FABRICATOR THAT TITLE _ �� ' . "` STONE VENEER CLADDING ON ,, ; THE RAILING SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE REMOVED FOR THE ���� "�� SEE NOTE 'A'/A9.4 CONCRETE WALL � EXTERIOR DETAILS � � WORK. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS ��; ,�:-« ; � --�� ,�,_ �;�— — –�: i �' � - . � � � � � � � � � WSTRUCTION WAS CARRIED OUT FAITHFULLY. -- � '� ` � �� �� � ���r o =� o , � �;� / � o 'u' IF ANY FURTHER CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED ON THIS SCALE ��� . c ] MATTER I CAN BE REACHED AT: MARK DATE �SSUE `� *� `,, o �(�° o� o �/' ..�:y� � � ��"-'� o ���` �"�� 04/22/14 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS � `` � � . �, � �--;-�-- �-�—� 703-395-2777 4'a- ? ie� :. � � � BRUCE S ZIVIC 06/04/14 REVISIONS TO PERMIT SET ;°`= - ,� l� o 0 0 =-- –� � jy :;�� — I O�. }- -, � �; � - .�r a HANDRAIL NOTE � � . �-� � 4� . A9.4 RELATES TO EXISTING HANDRAILS ONLY . - (4) EQ TREADS = 4'-0" 11" . ' �:. `� ' .'� �,3. �� ��..�. DRAWN JMS&TEAM �.f'� '�^` _ � � CHECKED WH ��R� � � � �{ i /� i � ` �r� � � PROJECT N0. I `t O Z I :��_ � � � �� � �'� t � � ' � 7 UNIT RAILING DETAIL 3 SITE RAILING DETAIL z� SITE STAIR AND RAILING DETAIL A9.4 NTS A9.4, 1-1/2�� : ��-��� A9.4 �-��2�� : ��-��� � �