The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIMBER FALLS CONDOMINIUMS UNIT 1002"a I i -ntb'-6/b finl-as Design Review Board ACTION FOR],I Department of Community Development 75 south Frontage Road. vail, colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 taxi 970.479.2452 web: $rww.vailgov,comco{ftt $ttY Gl€t.oFIEXT Project Name: Project Description r Participants: OWNER KUSIK DECK DRB Number: DR8070381 FINAL APPROVAL FOR AMINOR ALTEMTION FOR A DECK E(PANSION AT TIMBER FALS CONDOS UNIT #1002 KUSTK, GLENN A. & CHRISTINE 0810612007 2239 N 62ND ST MILWAUKEE wI 53213 APPLICANT KUSI( GLENN A. &CHRISTINE 08106/7007 2239 N 62ND ST MILWAUKEE wr 53213 Project Address: 4575 MEADOW DR VAIL Location3 TIMBER FALLS CONDOS 1OO2 Legal Description: Lot: Block: Subdivision: TIMBER FALLS CONDO Parcel Number: 2101-123-0200-2 Comments: Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Approval: 08/08/2007 Cond: 8 (pLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s)' Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Nimle Peterson DRB Fee Paid: $250.00Planner: cot0ru.{w oEr/EloFlrENT 75 South Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado El657 97 0-47 9 -2r3 8 / 47 9 -2r 39 FAX970-479-2452 August 8,2007 Glenn and Christine Kusik 2239 North 62od Street Wauwatdsa. WI 53213 gdusidevisa.com Re: DRB07-0381 4514 Meadow Drive #1002 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kusik, Nicole Peterson Planner, Town of Vail 970.477.3452 noeterson@vaileov.com At|achment: DRB Action Form Department of Community Development Thank you for your design review application for minor exteriol alterations to 4514 Meadow Drive #i 002. Ytur application to rebuild and expand the existing deck is staff approved' A DRB Action Form is attached for your records. Please inquire with the Building Department iegarding necessary building permits: If you have any questions or concems, please feel free to contact me. Best Regards, Minor Exterior Alterations Application for Design Review Department of C.ommunity Development 75 Sou$ Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2t28 Jax: 970.479.2452 web: www.nailgor.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission' D6ign review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Requese DEa(r t'J tr,urlf p6trTBD (a,RCCrt t Location of the Propolryl:-45t -PPhysical Address: .z Parcel no., A 01173 b7292 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.) oN cf,okd rl of M Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address: ut' @ \ Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant:s<^rtnr <r> -lc,r< Mailing Address: Phone: Fax:E-mail Address: Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs E Conceptual Review tr New Constructiontr Addition $s0 No Fee $650 $300 (qLL rr*Fl Approlre>,. 11,9)e6?4 Eal Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 addiuons & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window addiUons, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee xffi+::r#:lmmerciarv ffi Minor Alterdton (single family/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request tr tr +zu +******+*l*+++{"}*******++l+*****'}****++f*+'t**a*****++*'}tl***+++++**{'t*****+*+++**f******++** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement*+++l**+f******+*****+***t++++**********+++t*ftt**t*+i++f**tt***+++++***ttt***t*++t**t*t***a Stsatsement Nurdber: R0?0001444 Anount: $50.00 08/06/2OO703:32 pM Pa)ment Method: CaEh Init: iIS Notation: $/GLENN KUsrK Permit, No: DRBO7O38L Tlpe: DRB-Minor alt, Conun/l'lutti Parcel- No: 2r..Of-t23-O2OO-2 site Address: 4575 MEADOW DR \tArL IJOCAIiON: TIMBER FAIJIJS COIIDOS 1OO2 Total Fees: S50.00Thia Pa)ment: $50.00 Total AlIr Pmta: $50.00Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Deecription DR OO1OOOO3LL?2OO DESIGN REVIEW FEES Current Pmta s0.00 PROPOSED MATERIALS Tvoe of Material ColorBuildino Materials Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Sotrits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Ughting )f, other Notes: Please speciry the manufachrre/s namg the olor name and number and attach a color chip. F:\cdev\FORMS\PERJtlm\Planning\drb_minor-all1 1-23-2005.doc Lrl23l2OOs Page 6 of 13 PROPOSED TANDSCAPING Botanical Name Common Name OuantiW Size PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS DCSTING TREES TO BE REMOVED Minimum Requirements for Landscaping: Deciduous Trees - 2" Caliper Coniferous Trees - 6'in height Shrubs - 5 Gal. Type Souare Footaoe GROUND COVER SOD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL Please speciff other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) F:\cdev\FoRj"Is\PERMm\Pbnning\drb-minor-alt-11-23-2005.doc Page 7 of 13 LLl23l2005 On 31 Jul 2007, Hanson, Marc wrote: I agree so that makes 3 of 3 officers. Please make sure any underground sprinkling hoses are not going to be an issue. And in order for us to represent the best j.nterests of the other owners you should inform HOA officers if you want to change anything from the described design (other than a size reduction) before you start building. To answer the protocol question - my take on the bylaws is the officers are charged to run the day to day business of the HOA and so may make decisions Lj-ke this on beha-Lf of the HOA (or may decide in some cases that the entire HOA needs to be involved) , Note we can do stuff Like this, as weff as approve maintenance items, and use our judgment on discretionary items. Large projects that commit the HOA to assessrirents or building modifications, etc. need HOA vote and often, as j.n the case of our el-ectrical project or hot tub, need a 75ts vote. To answer the maintenance question - bylaws make owners responsible for all deck maintenance on their personal decks - whether it's the original deck or an expanded one, ALso - my position on deck expansj-on is to support it if it doesn't reduce someone e.Ise's view or use. Regards, Marc Hanson President, Timberfal]-s - Phase IV HOA On 31 Juf 2007, Kusik, Glenn wrote: > Marc/Ron/Barb, > Chris and I would like to gain your approval to move forwar:d with a > deck expansion project sjmilar to one thdt Fritz ori gLnally recej ved > approvaf on just prior to selJ-ing his unit to us. We have some > tairly Light timeframesf due to Contactor availabilit y, and so we're > hoping to gain final approval fairly quickly to proceed with this > proj ect . > We'd like to expand our back deck, in a fashion consistent with what > Marc and Leslie currentfy have in pl-ace. We're planning to expand > our deck from its current size to a 10'x 22' footprint, which is > slightly smaller Lhan the 10.5'x 23.5' fooLprint currenEfy in place > at Marc and LesLie's unit, Werre planning to use a Trex composite, > or another comparable material, as the decking surface afong with > traditional > building materj-a.ls for the foundation itseff. Although the Town of > Vail does not require the use of cement footers for a deck of this > size, we do plan to use them to improve structural integrity and > durability. > I spent some time at the Vail Community Development office yesterday > verifying that our pLans are consistent wj.th their design review > standards and that the proposed size woufd not viol-ate any property > Iine restrictions, > We'd Like to begin moving forward with this project sometime in the > next few weeks, as we have the unique opportunity to leverage the > services of the Contractor (Stubby) that's currently doing the > remodel of 1005. Her l-l- be finishing up with 1005 sometime in the > next week, but has a window in which to address our deck expansion > project before heading back to Afbuquerque, NM. > Let us know if you have quest ions or require addit ional c-Lari fication > on any of this. > q.\rr\/ f^r th6 eh.\rl n^fil-a rn^ l- hrnlze in :r'lrranno Fnr rrnrrr ^r.1mnf- vvt ' J> response. > cfenn and Chris Kusik 2.71..,p ' 'i'r.. i; ;l "i. t gA ii rii " L'i --i f IJi ltu 11, trrlrrllliiri ,n !!Jshrc N gg"&'@" A' 99.57 r-r.,\/\/'\.i r)[ uAtl D[:', "]lJ Iii:v-iEW ST'-.i-,- /rppROVAL t//r/o7 R ai Kb" ii .. ..t t, {i ii : ri; :91 ..,,ti $. :Y .:.. 'i1r,I S).- % t55.72 32.O4 SE Cu NE tA SW l/4 9rc. tZ T5S, RgOW, nrfi1g ,tS -lvni ):irl,j\",' j I ..LS A/.rr' llI ;lO li V.,i .ti ., i!/v\,.! SIIE PLAN Scote , t trcn =W Ut o/onn4c50DC Euilding dimenslons ore to ottlr/dc wni/c ,; i 'th a(rtt\ o 7,A,* __offig*, 1t'r.'\h€-(/; .aacr\ ;/:?e=